The URL can be used to link to this page

033018 Friday Staff Report ( I) City Manager's Office DENTON 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 • (940) 349-8307 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2018 TO: The Honorable Mayor Watts and Council Members FROM: Todd Hileman, City Manager SUBJECT: Friday Staff Report I. Council Schedule A. Meetings 1. Canceled- Council Luncheon Meeting, Monday, April 2, 2018. 2. Canceled - Committee on the Environment on Monday, April 2, 2018. 3. Traffic Safety Commission Meeting on Monday, April 2, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Work Session Room. 4. Committee on Citizen Engagement on Tuesday,April 3,2018 at 10:30 a.m. City Hall Conference Room. 5. Work Session of the City Council on Tuesday,April 3, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. in the City Council Work Session Room, followed by a Regular Meeting at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. 6. Agenda Committee Meeting on Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 3:30 p.m. in the City Manager's Conference Room. B. Upcoming Events 1. Serve Denton Banquet, Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 6:30 p.m. at Embassy Suites by Hilton Denton Convention Center. 2. Denton Chamber of Commerce Luncheon/Leadership Denton Graduation Friday, April 20, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. at Embassy Suites by Hilton Denton Convention Center. 3. Employee Service Awards Banquet, Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. at Embassy Suites by Hilton Denton Convention Center. OUR CORE VALUES Integrity • Fiscal Responsibility • Transparency 0 Outstanding Customer Service II. General Information & Status Update A. Easter Holiday Closing — Certain City of Denton facilities will be closed on Sunday, April 1, in observance of the Easter holiday. • Libraries -All libraries will be closed on Sunday, April 1 and will resume regular hours on Monday, April 2. • Parks and Recreation - Denton Natatorium and North Lakes Driving Range will be closed on Sunday, April 1 and will resume regular hours on Monday, April 2. • Solid Waste and Recycling - Solid Waste and Recycling service will not be impacted by the holiday. • Public Safety - Public safety personnel will be on duty during the holiday. The Denton Police Department can be reached at their non-emergency number which is (940) 349-8181, and in case of an emergency dial 911. • Utilities - Customer Service hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. To report a utility service emergency during a weekend or holiday, call utilities dispatch at(940) 349-7000. • Airport- Airport operations will not be impacted by the holiday. B. DDC Update — On Wednesday, staff held a series of meetings with stakeholders including the ad hoc Council Committee, Planning & Zoning Commission, developers and businesses, and a general public open house in the evening to present and review a draft of Module 2 of Administration & Procedures for the Denton Development Code update. Feedback and input received during these meetings has been tracked and will be compiled as staff and Clarion continue work on the DDC update. Staff will be working on setting dates and refining the review process for Module 3 Development Standards. More information will be forthcoming. Proposed Zoning Map Open House Events A proposed updated zoning map will be distributed and made available online at www.DentonCode203O.com by April 12. Staff is preparing to host a series of public open house events on the proposed zoning map. To get the word out, staff will be mailing a postcard to all property owners in the City (attached) and will also be using the City's multiple communications channels. The dates, times, and locations of the open houses are listed below: • Monday, April 23 from 6 to 8 p.m. at Fred Moore High School • Thursday, April 26 from 6 to 8 p.m. at LaGrone Advanced Technology Complex • Wednesday, May 2 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. at Development Services Center • Thursday, May 3 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. at Development Services Center • Monday, May 7 from 6 to 8 p.m. at Embassy Suites by Hilton Denton Convention Center • Thursday, May 10 from 6 to 8 p.m. at Sam Houston Elementary • Saturday, May 12 from 9 a.m. to noon at Denton Civic Center There will be many additional opportunities for public review and input as the Denton Development Code update continues to be reviewed through the spring and early summer. Staff contact: Scott McDonald C. Oak Gateway Area Plan Meeting Summga — On Thursday evening, the Oak Gateway Area Plan Steering Committee held their fifth meeting. The meeting began with an open discussion of the purpose and importance of the steering committee; committee members expressed concerns and offered ideas to shape the Committee's work going forward. The majority of the meeting was building on the success of the Community Workshop held last month, the Committee met to discuss the results of the input and feedback received. Prior to this meeting the Committee received all the input and feedback to review and be prepared to participate in table exercises to summarize the big ideas communicated and to begin drafting vision statement and guiding principles. The Committee communicated their concerns with the size of the Area Plan and decided to focus on the three subareas individually prior to developing the same for the overall Area Plan.The consensus is the Committee would be able to better formulate the overall vision and guiding principles after careful consideration of each subarea and finding common themes. Following the drafting of the vision statements, the Committee will finalize the Plan's guiding principles and will begin to draft initial recommendations with staff and the consultants. The next Committee meeting is scheduled for late April. After the draft vision, guiding principles, and initial recommendations are ready, the City will host a Public Open House in late May to share the drafts with the public and ask for their feedback. Additionally, at the request of the Committee,there was a discussion regarding the Bonnie Brae Widening Project, specifically near the intersection with Scripture Street. The Committee members that were in attendance expressed their opinion about the project. The general consensus was that the widening project would create a physical boundary, which would divide the Rayzor Ranch development from the neighborhoods to the east. They also felt that the preliminary design to straighten Bonnie Brae at the Scripture intersection should not be determined based on the standard speed for an arterial, and that the speed limit could be lowered in this area to maintain safety on the street. Lastly,the Committee felt that the existing homes on the east side of the street should not be demolished and the additional right-of-way needed should be from the west where there are existing parking lots or empty land. The Committee concluded that they would like to see a different solution. Staff contact: Ron Menguita D. I11-35E Phase 1 B Update—TxDOT continues work on the Phase 1 B proj ect of IH- 35E. The following actions are tentatively planned to occur next week and the following week; however dates are subject to change depending upon weather or construction activities. • Nightly lane closures, 10 p.m.to 6 a.m.,Monday April 2 to Thursday April 5, from Mayhill Road to Business 77. • Thursday night (April 5), northbound (NB) main lanes shift to previous nouhbound (SB) main lanes. • Should NB lane shift not be facilitated Thursday, lane shift will take place the following week. • NB main lanes and Brinker bridge construction activity is expected to begin the week of April 9. • Loop 288 Bridge Demolition to begin April 13-15,full weekend closure of Loop 288 intersection. City staff will continue to work with TxDOT as construction moves forward and closures are needed, to help distribute and push out information on closures and construction work through our communication channels. Staff contact: Mark Nelson E. IH-35W Public Meeting—TxDOT has provided notice that they will hold a public meeting for the purpose of soliciting public comments on the proposed reconstruction and widening of IH-35W from the Denton/Tarrant County Line to IH-35/IH-35E in Denton. The meeting will be held from 6 to 8 p.m., Thursday, April 19 at Argyle Middle School, 6601 Canyon Falls Dr., Argyle, Texas 76226. A copy of the notice received by the City is attached. In order to inform residents and encourage their attendance at this public meeting, the City is planning to highlight the meeting in social media posts during the week of April 9, notify neighborhood associations, and add the event to the City's event calendar on the website. Staff contact: Mark Nelson F. Bike/Ped Coordinator— The Bike/Ped coordinator position was transferred to the Capital Projects Department in mid-January this year. Subsequently, this position was advertised in February 2018 and since then the City has received 25 candidate applications. Staff is currently conducting phone interviews to screen some candidates. However, given the specialized nature of the position it has been difficult to find a good candidate pool for in person interviews. The recruitment will continue to be open in the hopes of finding more candidates to review. In the meantime, the City has engaged the services on Kimley Horn Associates to help staff fulfill the duties and responsibilities of the Bike/Ped Coordinator. Additionally, Kathryn Welch (Management Analyst) in the Capital Projects Department is helping the traffic division coordinate bike/ped related tasks and activities with other departments as well as external entities. Staff contact: Pritam Deshmukh G. Traffic Engineer—The Traffic Engineer position was advertised in February 2018 and since then the City has received 9 applications from candidates in the last eight weeks.As Traffic Engineering is a very specialized field within Civil Engineering, the available pool of candidates is very small. Given the growth in the state and the DFW region, the demand for traffic engineers is very high and very difficult recruit to fill this position. From the current list of applicants staff has shortlisted three candidates for phone interviews which will be conducted next week. Additionally, staff is working with Human Resources to understand certain nuances related to work visas. This will help us tap into a separate pool of candidates that typically would not apply for a position at the City. Staff intends to fill this position in the next four to six weeks. Staff contact: Pritam Deshmukh H. McKinney Street Widening Project Status — The City of Denton contracted with Huitt-Zollars in October of 2017 to prepare procurement documents for the hiring of a design-build team. The procurement documents will include 30%construction plans for the widening of McKinney Street from two lanes to four divided lanes from Woodrow Lane on the west end to Grissom Street on the east end. The procurement documents will also include Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Request for Proposal (RFP) packages for the design-build teams. Creation of the 30% plans is currently in progress with a draft package expected at the end of April. The RFQ is on track to be issued at the end of July 2018 and the RFP at the very beginning of 2019. Award of a contract to a design-build team is anticipated to happen in July 2019. The McKinney Street project is being paid for by funds provided as part of an Advance Funding Agreement with TxDOT using Regional Toll Revenue money. As part of the Advance Funding Agreement, the City of Denton is obligated to begin construction of the project by the end of September of 2018 or funding could be removed/cancelled. The City of Denton will meet the September 2018 deadline by starting the construction phase sidewalk(the sidewalk to allow safe passage for pedestrians during construction) east of Loop 288 to Ryan High School. This component of the construction will include construction zone safety measures including fences and signage. The construction phase sidewalk and safety measures will begin at the end of May 2018 in time to be completed by the beginning of the 2018-19 school year. Following completion of the construction phase sidewalk,the relocation of utilities will begin in anticipation of the July 2019 construction start date. Staff contact: Todd Estes I. DME Power Supply Resources —Please see attached memo from DME General Manager George Morrow with a summary of existing and planned DME power supply resources. Staff contact: George Morrow J. DEC Air Emissions Testing—The emission testing for the DEC will be overseen by the Black and Veatch Air Quality Group (B&V). B&V has contracted with Air Hygiene,Inc. of Broken Bow,Oklahoma to perform the stack testing.Air Hygiene is accredited by the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to perform the required tests. To validate compliance with the DEC's Standard Air Permit, stack testing must be performed on all 12 of the plant's engines. The TCEQ will be notified 30 days prior to the testing. The TCEQ will have the option to witness the tests. The tests must be performed with the engines running at 100% load. Plant staff will bring the engines up to full load and then maintain the level for the duration of the test. Air Hygiene will insert calibrated instruments into the sample ports (see image below) and collect exhaust gas samples. Air Hygiene's instruments will log the data gathered during the test runs for further analysis. The plant's emission rates must be equal to or less than the standard permit levels for the plant to go operational. A report will be compiled by Air Hygiene and B&V documenting the test results and submitted to the TCEQ on the City's behalf A full report of the results will also be provided to Council once testing has been completed. The DEC has the operation capability to operate at less than full load.To document the engine's emission's levels at various loads, the above process will be completed for 40%, 50% and 75% loads. All totaled the emission test plan will entail 144 individual sample events. The additional test data will provide DME with operational emission curves that will ensure the plant's compliance with TCEQ Standard Air Permit. A copy of the DEC air emissions testing protocol is attached. Staff contact: George Morrow Emissions Sampling Ports •, f K. Disposal of Surplus Property — At the City Council Work Session on August 8, 2017, staff presented information concerning prospective surplus city owned real property tracts. Council directed staff to move forward with the first group of tracts for disposal. An RFP was prepared and released on March 20, 2018. Below is an overview of the tracts included in the R-FP, with a more detailed summary attached. TRACT# DCAD STREET ADDRESS CURRENT DISPOSITION DEEDINFO ZONING ACREAGE SQFT Paved,flat lot.Subject to 1 76394 Maple ST-100 Block easements 2010-71488 DC-G 0.0494 2,152 Vacant,flat lot.Subject to reservation of new drainage 21 33416 702 S Locust St easement.In floodplain. 2010-71488 DC-G 0.376 16,405 Two(2)easements to be reserved at closing.Significant 35926 portions of the Tracts are in 3 &35928 2910 E University Dr floodplain or floodway 2012-130856 NRMU 1.9126 83,313 Subject to easements.Water tower has been demolished, 4 205224 N Bell Ave footings remain in place. VOL 335,PG 370 NRMU-12 0.2376 10,350 Subject to easements.Vacant, flat lot.The well has been 5 161512 2100 E.Sherman Dr plugged. VOL 386,PG 462 NR-3 0.8231 35,854 Bids are due on April 19, 2018. Purchasing will evaluate and rank initial results by April 30, 2018. It is anticipated that staff will bring an item for City Council consideration to award bids at the May 22,2018 at the City Council meeting. Staff contact: Paul Williamson L. Great American Cleanup—On Saturday,March 24,Keep Denton Beautiful hosted its 30th Annual Great American Cleanup (GAC). A press release summarizing the event is attached. Staff contact: Julie Anderson III. Community Events IV. Attachments A. Postcard- DDC Proposed Zoning Map Open House Events B. TxDOT IH-35W Public Meeting Notice C. Summary of Existing and Planned DME Power Supply Resources D. DEC Air Emissions Testing Protocol E. Great American Cleanup Press Release V. Informal Staff Reports A. 2018-035 Denco Area 9-1-1 Appointment to District Board of Managers B. 2018-036 Emergency Response Framework C. 2018-037 Cemetery Improvements D. 2018-038 Small Cell Update VI. Council Information A. Council Requests for Information B. Draft Agenda(April 10) C. Council Calendar D. Future Council Items E. Street Construction Report DENTON CODE 2030 - ZONING MAP Denton Code 2030 is the City's ongoing effort to update,revise,and rewrite the Denton Development Code(DDC).The DDC sets the requirements for what,where,and how much can be built in Denton.With the recent adoption of the City's comprehensive plan, Denton Plan 2030,now is the perfect time to work to align our development regulations with the vision,goals,and policies approved by the City Council.The update to the DDC will address a variety of issues raised in Denton Plan 2030,including updated design standards that address the layout,look,and feel of both new development and redevelopment. The primary objectives are: WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU! • Improve the efficiency of the development review process See the back of this card • Remove unnecessary barriers to infill and redevelopment for information about • Enhance the user experience by reorganizing and reformatting the DDC our DDC public • Protect historic and established neighborhoods open houses. • Create a more predictable code and processes for developers and stakeholders A new lineup of zoning districts is also being proposed,which consolidates, renames, eliminates, and creates new districts.An updated zoning map reflecting these districts will be proposed with the revised DDC.While you may find yourself in a new zoning district,the current policies affecting single-family neighborhoods will not substantially change. To learn more about the DDC update, including the proposed zoning districts, visit www.dentoncode203O.com. A Dentonguide CITY CODEDEVEL 2030 t NT he of TON future WEWANTTO HEAR FROM YOU1. We invite you to join us at one or more of our public open house j events where you can learn more about the DDC and proposed zoning map,speak with City staff,and provide invaluable feedback. DENTON i Development Services Center MONDAY,APRIL 23 THURSDAY,APRIL 26 215 W.Hickory St. 6 to 8 p.m. 6 to 8 p.m. Denton,Texas 76201 Fred Moore High School LaGrone Advanced Technology Complex 815 Cross Timber St. 1504 Long Rd. WEDNESDAY,MAY THURSDAY,MAY 8 a.m.to 5 p.m. 8 a.m.to 5 p.m. Development Services Center Development Services Center 215 W.Hickory St. 215 W.Hickory St. MONDAY,MAY 7 THURSDAY,MAY 10 6 to 8 p.m. 6 to 8 p.m. Embassy Suites by Hilton Sam Houston Elementary Denton Convention Center 3100 Teasley Ln. 3100 Town Center TH. Visit www.dentoncode203O.com SATURDAY,MAY 12 to get information about the 9 a.m.to noon different components of the DDC Denton Civic Center 321 E.McKinney St. and how they are changing. Produced by the City of Denton•ADA/EOE/ADEA•TDD(800)735-2989•www.cityofdenton.com RECEIVED Departmenf MAR 2 7 2018 Texas of T,r ,t_,. rtinn CITY 11HIV,-qo"! NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING uf ' IH 35W from the Denton/Tarrant County Line to IH 35II111 35E Tarrant and Denton Counties CSJ: 0081-13-050, 0081-13-058, 0081-13-065 The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) will conduct a Public Meeting for the purpose of soliciting public comments on the proposed reconstruction and widening of Interstate (IH) 35W from the Denton/Tarrant County Line to IH 35/IH 35E. The meeting will be held from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 19, 2018 at Argyle Middle School, located at 6601 Canyon Falls Drive, Argyle, Texas 76226. The Public Meeting will be an Open House format with no formal presentation. Representatives from TxDOT and project consultants will be available to answer questions about the proposed project improvements. The proposed project would consist of the reconstruction and widening of IH 35W from the Denton/Tarrant County line to the IH 35/IH35E interchange within the cities and towns of Denton, Argyle, Draper, Flower Mound, Northlake, Fort Worth, and Haslet in Denton and Tarrant Counties, Texas. The IH 35W mainlanes would be widened from four lanes to six lanes. Continuous four lane frontage roads with auxiliary lanes would be added from Dale Earnhardt Way to the IH 35/IH 35E interchange. Existing ramps would be reconfigured and/or relocated. Cross street intersections would be upgraded to an urban style intersection and may require grade separation. Additional right- of-way is anticipated to be needed for the addition of the new frontage roads. Construction is anticipated to take place in phases, with frontage road improvements occurring first. Maps showing the proposed project's location and geometric design will be available for viewing at the public meeting. The public meeting notice and venue map will also be available online at www.keei)itmovinadallas.com under Upcoming Public Hearing/Meeting. All interested persons are invited to attend this Public Meeting and express their views on the proposed project. Written comments from the public regarding this project are requested and will be accepted for a period of 15 calendar days following the meeting.Written comments may be submitted either in person, or by mail to: Nelson Underwood, P.E., TxDOT Project Manager, 4777 E. Highway 80, Mesquite, TX 75150-6643, or via email to Nelson.Underwood@txdot.gov. Written comments must be postmarked by Friday, May 4, 2018, to be included in the Public Meeting Summary. Persons interested in attending this meeting who have special communication or accommodation needs are encouraged to contact the TxDOT Dallas District Public Information Office at (214) 320- 4480 at least two working days prior to the meeting. Because the Public Meeting will be conducted in English, any requests for language interpreters or other special communication needs should also be made at least two days prior to the Public Meeting. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate these needs. The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by TxDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 16, 2014, and executed by FHWA and TxDOT. Public Meeting Location Map PUBLIC MEETING Thursday, April 19, 2018, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Argyle Middle School - Cafeteria 6601 Canyon Falls Drive, Argyle, Texas 76226 ® - DENTON Directions: Take IH 35W to Cross Timbers Denton Municipal Road/FM 1171. Travel east on Airport Cross Timbers Road/FM 1171 U� and turn north onto Canyon Falls Drive. Continue on Canyon - --- _Inta"'Blvd. Falls Drive and enter the school parking lot from Horsehoe Falls DENTON wlredRd. Drive or Prairie Ridge Road. LEGEND Robson Ranc Rd. � dFdJustinRd. — ARGYLE Project Limits Argyle Middle School Public Meeting Location DRAPER 6601 Canyon Falls Dr. ® JUSTIN Argyle,Texas 76226 i Parking F00 BARTONVILLE NORTHLAKE C J North•,.vest ,%nI►1b `1� Regional \_�!W�_I 2 Airport FLOWER T Texas Motor - - — Speedway MOUND O c ENTRANCE RDA KE �............................ ..... ................................ .................... 1 WESTLAKE VNs6 PkwY HASLET ';.�RT WORTH SOUTH KE 1 KELLER I Interstate Highway From nt County Line to DME Administration M U N I C I P A L 1659 Spencer Rd., Denton, TX 76205 • (940) 349-7105 E L E C T R I C MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 2017 TO: Todd Hileman, City Manager FROM: George Morrow, DME General Manager SUBJECT: Summary of Existing and Planned DME Power Supply Resources As we discussed, attached is a high level summary of DME's existing and planned power supply resources. Existing electric resources include Whitetail,the Denton Landfill and Gibbons Creek. These are presently supplemented by short term market purchases. New/planned electric resources include the Santa Rita wind project(projected April 2018 operation), the Denton Energy Center(project June 1, 2018 commercial operation), and the Bluebell solar project (expected November 2018 operation). A total of 300 MW of additional renewable resources are in the planning/RFP process. • The first 100 MW is expected to be acquired via a Denton RFP that is in contract development. • The second 100 MW acquisition is expected to be acquired via a New Braunfels RFP with an April 10, 2018 due date. • An additional 100 MW is expected to be obtained from a Denton RFP to be released in mid-May 2018. If I can provide anything further in this regard, please let me know. OUR CORE VALUES Integrity 9 Fiscal Responsibility • Transparency • Outstanding Customer Service DME Energy Portfolio Summary Existing Resources Annual Size Output Contract Resouce Name Type Fuel (MW) (MWH) Expiration Gibbons Creek Power Plant Coal 100 * 218,000 9/30/18 ** White Ta i I PPA Wind+RECs 30 262,000 12/31/23 Denton Landfill PPA Landfill Gas 1 10,000 12/31/24 Market Short Term N/A N/A 207,900 *** 8/31/18 Planned Resources Annual Size Output Expected Resouce Name Type Fuel (MW) (MWH) Start Denton Energy Center Power Plant Natural Gas 244 338,500 6/1/18 Blue Bell Solar PPA Solar 30 82,500 11/1/18 Santa Rita Wind PPA Wind 150 550,000 4/11/18 RFP 1 PPA Solar 100 275,000 12/31/20 RFP 2 PPA Solar 100 275,000 12/31/20 RFP 3 PPA Coastal Wind 100 438,000 6/1/20 Notes * Represents Denton's share of plant output; increases to 111 MW beginning 9/1/18 ** Operation beyond 2018 to be determined *** Net forward purchases and sales executed to date for delivery in 2018 3/30/18 �-� Testing Solutions for a Better World AIR HYfiIENE.INC. COMPLIANCE TESTING PROTOCOL FOR TWELVE WARTSILA 18V50SG RECIPROCATING ■ ■ • INTERNAL COMBUSTION PREPARED ■ ■ ■ , • CITY OF DENTON AND BLACK VEATCH AT THE ENERGYDENTON CENTER ■ ■ • JECT DENTONJEXAS Texas Commission on • Standard - - • • No: • March 21, 2018 _ Remote Testing Offices Las Vegas, NV 89156 - _ _- _- - AIR HYGIENE.INC. Ft. Worth, TX 76028 Humble, TX 77338 Corporate Headquarters Shreveport, LA 71115 1600 W Tacoma Street (918) 307-8865 or (888) 461-8778 Miami, FL 33101 Broken Arrow, OK 74012 www.airhygiene.com Pittsburgh, PA 15205 & 0 Testing Solutions 1 . Better W AIR HYGIENE,INC. COMPLIANCE TESTING PROTOCOL FOR TWELVE WARTSILA 18V50SG RECIPROCATING INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES PREPARED FOR CITY OF DENTON AND BLACK & VEATCH AT THE DENTON ENERGY CENTER PROJECT DENTON, TEXAS Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Standard Permit Registration No: 135651 March 21, 2018 Prepared By: rev - 0 Nathan Arthur, QSTI, Sr. Manager—Test Protocols Remote Testing Offices .r' Las Vegas, 89156 AIR HVIAENE.INC. Ft. Worth, TX 76028 Humble, Corporate . • • Shreveport, .00 W Tacoma • : ::. . ::: 461-8778 Miami, FL 33101 BrokenArrow, OK 74012www.airhygiene.com " 15205 (this page intentionally left blank) Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 General Facility Description .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Reason for Testing........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SUMMARY................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Contractor Information....................................................................................................................................2 2.2 Site Information.................................................................................................................................................2 2.3 Test Contractor Information ..........................................................................................................................2 2.4 Expected Test Start Date................................................................................................................................2 2.5 Testing Schedule..............................................................................................................................................3 2.6 Test Report Content.........................................................................................................................................3 2.7 Equipment and Procedures ...........................................................................................................................4 2.8 Proposed Variations ........................................................................................................................................4 2.9 Compliance Sampling Strategy ....................................................................................................................5 Appendix A QA/QC PROGRAM Appendix B TEST EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION AND DESCRIPTION Figure 1 — Emissions Testing Setup Figure 2 — Method 5 and 202 Assembly Table 1 — Analytical Instrumentation Table 2 — Analytical Instrumentation Testing Configuration Appendix C STACK DRAWINGS Appendix D EXAMPLE TEMPLATES AND CALCULATIONS Appendix E STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS i 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Facility Description City of Denton (CD) owns and operates the Denton Energy Center Project located at 8499 Jim Christal Road in Denton, Texas. The plant consists of twelve natural gas-fired Wartsila 18V50SG engines, capable of producing a combined 255 MW of electricity. Each individual engine maximum rate horsepower(hp) is 25,761 hp. The engine stacks are vertical, circular and measure 5.3 feet (ft) (63.5 inches) in diameter at the test ports. The test ports are located approximately 32.69 ft (392.27 inches) downstream and approximately 7.42 ft(89 inches) upstream from the nearest disturbances. 1.2 Reason for Testing The units are subject to emission testing requirements set forth in the standards designated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations 40 CFR 60, Subpart JJJJ, and by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Standard Permit (Registration No: 135651); and to the limits specified in Table 1.2. As such, the units will be tested for nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), flow, moisture, volatile organic compounds (VOC), particulate matter (PMIO/2.5), ammonia (NH3), carbon dioxide (COA and oxygen (02) with the units operating at 100% Load. TABLE 1.2 Emission Limits Target Permit Limits NSPS Subpart JJJJ Limits NOx 1.3 3 lb/hr 1.0 g/hp-hr or 82 mvd 15%02 CO 4.96 lb/hr 2.0 g/hp-hr or 270 mvd 15%02 VOC 2.071b/hr 0.7 g/hp-hr or 60 mvd 15%02 PMlOi2.5 3.17 lb/hr N/A S02 0.091b/hr N/A NH3 3.17 lb/hr N/A 1. S02 emission rate will be calculated using fuel analysis by-18-denton.tx-start#2(TCEQ)-protocol-revOb 1 2.0 SUMMARY 2.1 Contractor Information Company: Black& Veatch(BV) Contact Person: Paul Lee, P.E. Mailing Address: 4600 S. Syracuse Street, Suite 800 Denver, Colorado 80237 Office: (720) 834-4303 Email: LeeP@BV.com 2.2 Site Information Site: Denton Energy Center Project Contact Person: Chris Lutrick City of Denton Site Address: 8499 Jim Christal Raod Denton, Texas 76207 Office: (940) 349-7152 Cell: (469) 203-9898 Email: chris.lutrick@cityofdenton.com Latitude, Longitude: 33.221282, -97.216508 2.3 Test Contractor Information Company: Air Hygiene International, Inc. Contact Person: Danny Parr, Director of Operations Mailing Address: 1600 W Tacoma Street Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 Office: (918) 307-8865 Cell: (918) 809-8947 Fax: (918) 307-9131 E-mail: danny@airhygiene.com Website: www.airhygiene.com AETB Certificate No: 3796.02 ISO/IEC Certificate No: 3796.01 NELAP Accreditation No: T104704523-14-1 2.4 Expected Test Start Date Testing is anticipated to begin on April 24, 2018. Notification of changes will be made by CD and BV, as necessary. by-18-denton.tx-start#2(TCEQ)-protocol-revOb 2 2.5 Testing Schedule The following schedule indicates specific activities required to be done each day; however, the schedule may require flexibility and will be compacted or extended as necessary. Specific unit test order will be determined by CD and BV. Pre-test Activities Due Date 1. Prepare draft test protocol (Air Hygiene) >30 days prior to testing 2. Submit final approved test plan to TCEQ/EPA (CD and BV) >30 days prior to testing On-site Activities Time Day 0—Initial site mobilization, setup • Arrive at site and attend safety training 08:00— 09:00 • Setup on Engines 1-4 09:00— 12:00 • Conduct preliminary testing of Air Hygiene equipment 12:00— 16:00 Compliance Testing Time Day I —Engines 1-4, 100%Load, natural gas • Daily setup and calibrations 07:00— 08:00 • Conduct preliminary testing and stratification test 08:00 09:00 • Flow traverse for cyclonic flow profile,stack velocity,and stack temperature • Stratification testing for NOx and 02 • Collect Fuel Samples (1 primary, I backup) 09:00— 09:30 • Conduct testing for NOx, CO, VOC,NH3, CO2, and 02 09:00— 14:00 • NOx,CO,VOC,NH3,CO2,and 02 testing:3,60-minute runs • Moisture testing:3,60-minute runs • Conduct testing for PMloi2i5 09:00— 19:00 • 3,approximately 3,approximately 2.5-hour tests collecting approximately 100 dscf will be conducted • COZ and 02 will be monitored periodically for molecular weight determinations • Teardown on Engines 1-4 and setup on Engines 5-8 19:00 21:00 Days 2-3 —Follow Day 1 schedule on Engines 5-12 Activities after Testing • Demobilization of Testing Crew(Air Hygiene) Day 1 • Preparation of draft test report(Air Hygiene) Days 2-9 • Submit for review to CD and BV (Air Hygiene) Day 10 • Review and comment on draft(CD and BV) Days 11 — 15 • Prepare final hard copy test reports (Air Hygiene) Days 16— 19 • Final reports delivered to CD and BV(Air Hygiene) Day 20 2.6 Test Report Content The Test Reports for the units will meet the requirements of the TCEQ and the EPA for compliance and certification testing. The reports will include discussion of the following: • Introduction • Plant and Sampling Location Description by-18-denton.tx-start#2(TCEQ)-protocol-revOb 3 • Summary and Discussion of Test Results Relative to Acceptance Criteria • Sampling and Analytical Procedures • QA/QC Activities • Test Results and Related Calculations • Stack and Testing Equipment Drawings • Raw Field Data and Calibration Data Sheets • Sampling Log and Chain-of-Custody Records • Audit Data Sheets 2.7 Equipment and Procedures Test methods and parameters to satisfy 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 60, Part 51, and Part 63 will include: • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 1 for sample location • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 2 for sample exhaust flow • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 3A for oxygen(02) and carbon dioxide (CO2) • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 4 for stack exhaust moisture • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 5 for particulate matter(PM) (front half filterables) • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 7E for nitrogen oxides (NOx) • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 10 for carbon monoxide (CO) • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 19 for stack exhaust FFactor including EPA's FAQ and derived stoichiometric stack exhaust flow calculation(see Appendix D) • 40 CFR 60, App A, EPA Method 18 and 25A for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) • 40 CFR 51, App M, EPA Method 202 for particulate matter(PM) (back half condensables) • 40 CFR 63, App A, EPA Method 320 for FTIR of ammonia(NH3) • ASTM 6667 for sulfur content of natural gas • ASTM 1945 for fuel analysis of natural gas Based on equipment availability and additional test needs, test methods in place of 4, 7E, 10 may also include: • 40 CFR 63, App A, EPA Method 320 for moisture, NOx, CO by FTIR Analyzer 2.8 Proposed Variations All moisture tests conducted utilizing Method 4, when it is not used per the Section 16.4 FFactor calculation technique, will be approximately 35-minutes in duration, rather than for the duration of the pollutant test run; which at a required flow rate near the maximum of 0.75 dry cubic feet per minute (e.g. OH@ of the console) will result in a minimum of 21 dry standard cubic feet of sample, as required by the method. The exception will be all moisture tests conducted utilizing Method 320, which will be approximately 60-minutes in duration, since the moisture and pollutant concentrations are measured by the same analyzer simultaneously. Regardless of method, all moisture tests will be conducted from a single point near the center of the stack, if accessible, or some other point as defined in the report, as moisture in this type of source tends to exist as a homogenous cloud, exhibiting no significant by-18-denton.tx-start#2(TCEQ)-protocol-revOb 4 stratification as researched and supported by USEPA ALT-008 and ALT-0060. As needed, an unheated stainless steel hook may be utilized over the top of the stack and back down into the flow to accommodate the availability of sample ports and will be connected to the impinger train with unheated Teflon tubing, assuming that the impinger train is forced to be located at grade level due to test port and/or stack configuration conditions. Condensation that occurs in the probe and tubing combination will drain, via gravity, to the impinger train and will be assisted by field personnel, who will purposely drain the assembly into the impinger train at the conclusion of each test run. All particulate matter (PM) will be assumed as PMloi2i5 and EPA Method 5 will be used for front half filterables rather than EPA Method 201a. As such, in lieu of borosilicate glass nozzles and probe liners, Method 5/202 may utilize stainless steel nozzles and inconel liners to prevent breakage, particularly during port changes. PM10i2.5 testing will meet the 40 CFR 60.50Da(b).2.i requirement that each run be a minimum of two hours and collect at least 60 dry standard cubic feet of sample and is anticipated to be approximately 2.5 hours in duration and collect approximately 100 dry standard cubic feet of sample. 2.9 Compliance Sampling Strategy Testing will be conducted on the units for nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), flow, moisture, volatile organic compounds (VOC), particulate matter (PMloi2.5), ammonia (NH3), carbon dioxide (CO2), and oxygen (OZ) with the units operating at 100% Load. Prior to testing a stratification test for NOx and 02 will be performed to determine the sample point(s) for the remainder of the gas tests. Also, a preliminary flow traverse will be conducted to confirm the absence of cyclonic flow and record profiles for stack velocity and stack temperature. After the stratification and preliminary tests, testing for each engine will include: • NOx—3 test runs at 1 hour per run • CO—3 test runs at 1 hour per run • VOCs—3 test runs at 1 hour per run • NH3—3 test runs at 1 hour per run • 02 and CO2—3 test runs at 1 hour per run • PMio—3 test runs at approximately 2.5 hours per run • PM2.5—3 test runs at approximately 2.5 hours per run • Moisture and flow testing in conjunction with the above tests • 02 and CO2 monitored periodically for molecular weight determination Information and data collected by CD and/or BV during the specific engine test period and required to be included in each of the engine reports shall include: engine speed (rpm), output power (hp), fuel flow (scfh), air manifold pressure (psi), air manifold temperature ff), suction pressure (psi), discharge pressure (psi), and engine timing (°BTDC). Air Hygiene personnel will monitor and record ambient temperature ff), relative humidity (%), and barometric pressure (in. Hg) at the start of each test run. Air Hygiene personnel will collect a fuel gas sample for each day of testing. by-18-denton.tx-start#2(TCEQ)-protocol-revob 5 Method 1, 2, and 4—Exhaust Flow and Moisture Testing Flow rates will be monitored with S-type Pitot tubes and oil filled manometers. Total sample volumes will be measured with dry gas meters. The resulting Method 2 velocity heads will be combined with Method 3A (molecular weight) and Method 4 (moisture content) data to determine the stack gas volumetric flow rate. Method 3A, 7E, 10, 18/25A — Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxide, Carbon Monoxide, and VOC Testing Refer to Appendix B for additional details. VOC emission concentrations will be quantified in accordance with principles set forth in EPA Method 18 and 25A. A VIG 210 will be used for this purpose. The VIG 210 includes both a conventional total hydrocarbon (THC) analyzer and an automated gas chromatograph (GC) for determining VOCs. Two FIDs (flame ionization detectors) are used for the measurements: one for the THC channel and the other for the automated GC which can measure methane, ethane, and residual (VOCs). The THC sample is injected directly to the FID. This detector responds to all hydrocarbons in the sample. For VOC sampling, a heated gas sampling valve is used for direct injection of the gas on the GC column per Method 18, Section 8.2.2. The GC column separates hydrocarbon components based on their molecular configurations, weights, and boiling points. In this application, the analyzer uses the gas chromatograph column to separate methane and ethane from the heavier residual hydrocarbons (i.e. VOCs). Methane elutes from the sample first, it is immediately detected by the FID; ethane elutes from the column second and is detected. The flow in the column is reversed (back-flushed) and the residual components are recombined and detected by the FID (Method 25A) as residual VOCs. The sample time of the VOC is approximately four minutes, so each 60 minute test run corresponds to approximately 14 sample injections. EPA Method 7E bias and drift check criterion will be used to validate data instead of EPA Method 18 recovery studies as it is has more stringent and comprehensive quality assurance procedures. National Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) traceable propane calibration gas will be used to calibrate the VOC and the calibration procedure following EPA Method 25A. In this application, the target analyte is VOC (non methane, non ethane hydrocarbon); therefore, the methane and ethane concentrations will not be formally calibrated. Method 5/202—Particulate Matter Testing The sample system used for the PM10i2.5 sampling will include a heated stainless steel probe sheath with a glass or inconel liner and glass or stainless steel nozzle. The nozzle and probe assembly will be inserted into a sample port of the stack to extract gas measurements from the emission stream through a filter and glass impinger train in an isokinetic fashion. Flow rates will be monitored with S-type Pitot tubes and oil filled manometers. Total sample volumes will be measured with dry gas meters. The resulting Method 2 velocity heads will be combined with Method 3A (molecular weight) and Method 4 (moisture content) data to determine the stack gas volumetric flow rate. These results will be combined with pollutant concentrations (i.e. parts per million) to determine emission rates (i.e. pounds per hour), as required. Per the requirements of the revised Method 202, the back half of the test train will include a condenser and dry impinger train configuration. Sample collection will include a nitrogen purge and by-18-denton.tx-start#2(TCEQ)-protocol-revOb 6 hexane rinse. All samples will be analyzed off-site, by Air Hygiene's lab, with summaries estimated one week after completion of testing. Method 320—FTIR Testing (Ammonia) A MKS Instruments - MultiGasTM Fourier transform infrared(FTIR) spectrometer, or equivalent, will be used for ammonia analysis per EPA Method 320. The FTIR spectrometer spectral resolution is 0.5 cm 1. The system employs a silicon carbide infrared source at 1200 °C, a helium neon reference laser, beam splitters, and potassium bromide (KBr) cell window, front-surface optical transfer mirrors, and multi- pass absorption cells. MCT detectors will be used and cooled with liquid nitrogen in order to maintain a constant temperature of 77 Kelvin. The approximately 5.11-meter multi-pass path cells incorporate aspheric, aberration-correcting mirrors to increase the optical throughput and the detection sensitivity. Transducers and thermocouples are connected directly to the insulated sample cells that provide the pressure and temperatures of the sample streams. During testing, the temperature of the absorption cells will be set at 191 'C. Elevated temperature prevents gas condensation within the cell and minimizes analyte adhesion to the cell walls and mirrors. The volume of the absorption cell is 0.5 liters, so at a sample gas flow rate of 4.0 liters per minute, the sample gas in the cell is refreshed approximately four times each minute. Interferograms consisting of 56 co-added scans will be recorded continuously during the test periods, and will provide approximately 60-second average concentrations. All test results will be available in real-time, on-site,with summaries at the end of each test day. by-18-denton.tx-start#2(TCEQ)-protocol-revOb 7 APPENDIX A QA/QC PROGRAM QA/QC PROGRAM AIR HYGIENE ensures the quality and validity of its emission measurement and reporting procedures through a rigorous quality assurance(QA)program. The program is developed and administered by an internal QA team and encompasses six major areas: 1. Field Qualifications 2. QA reviews of reports,laboratory work,and field testing; 3. Equipment calibration and maintenance; 4. Chain-of-custody; 5. Training;and 6. Knowledge of current test methods Field Qualifications Air Hygiene personnel are required to gain and maintain competence with testing methods and techniques according to their job titles and the roles they play during field testing events. Qualifications for each job description include: Staff Technician-An entry level position with responsibility to test on the stack by performing duties that include:keep trucks and trailers stocked and clean,travel to and from job site,be the"hands of the test"on the stack;stay on a stack during the sample test,set up and tear down equipment on-site,perform maintenance on equipment in the shop and on-site. Test Technician or Specialist-Acts as the"hands of the test"on the stack by performing duties that include: stay on a stack during the sample test,migrate to the testing trailer and learn the different analyzers and testing methods used on site,set up and tear down testing equipment on site,learn the system for testing from Testing Managers and Project Managers,travel to and from job site; including driving responsibilities under DOT requirements,follow directions of Testing Managers and Project Managers,learn the proper way to conduct on-site test of stationary stacks Test Manager or Engineer-Directs and coordinates all aspects of a successful test by performing the following duties personally or through subordinate supervisors including: operating analyzers and consoles during testing along with QA/QC procedures,supervise set up and tear down of equipment on site,writing,reviewing,and revising final test reports,working with the client or state personnel while on the job site,managing pre-test checklists and onsite testing procedures,diagnose and repair any problems that may arise with the equipment,safely operate a man life and drive a truck with or without a trailer,act as crew leader in the field,write protocols and reports,maintain project log of services performed on the job,verify all equipment needed for a job was loaded on the trailer. Test Managers must hold as least one QSTI certificate. Project Manager-Directs and coordinates all aspects of a successful test by performing the following duties personally or through subordinate supervisors including: operating analyzers and consoles during testing along with QA/QC procedures,supervise set up and tear down of equipment on site,writing,reviewing,and revising final test reports,working with the client or state personnel while on the job site,managing pre-test checklists and onsite testing procedures,diagnose and repair any problems that may arise with the equipment,safely operate a man life and drive a truck with or without a trailer,act as crew leader in the field,write protocols and reports,maintain project log of services performed on the job,verify all equipment needed for a job was loaded on the trailer. Project Managers typically hold QSTI certificates in Groups 1 through 4. QA Reviews AIR HYGIENE's review procedure includes a review of each source test report, along with laboratory and fieldwork by the QA Team. The most important review is the one that takes place before a test program begins. The QA Team works closely with technical division personnel to prepare and review test protocols. Test protocol review includes selection of appropriate test procedures, evaluation of interferences or other restrictions that might preclude use of standard test procedures,and evaluation and/or development of alternate procedures. Equipment Calibration and Maintenance The equipment used to conduct the emission measurements is maintained according to the manufacturer's instructions to ensure proper operation. In addition to the maintenance program, calibrations are carried out on each measurement device according to the schedule outlined by the Environmental Protection Agency. Quality control checks are also conducted in the field for each test program. Chain-of-Custody AIR HYGIENE maintains full chain-of-custody documentation on all samples and data sheets. In addition to normal documentation of changes between field sample custodians, laboratory personnel, and field test personnel, AIR HYGIENE documents every individual who handles any test component in the field(e.g.,probe wash, impinger loading and recovery, filter loading and recovery, etc.). Samples are stored in a locked area to which only AIR HYGIENE personnel have access. Field data sheets are secured at AIR HYGIENE's offices upon return from the field. Per standard Air Hygiene policy, laboratory samples will be discarded after 30 days of receipt of final report unless otherwise specified in writing. Training Personnel training is essential to ensure quality testing.AIR HYGIENE has formal and informal training programs,which include: l. Attendance at EPA-sponsored training courses; 2. Enrollment in EPA correspondence courses; 3. A requirement for all technicians to read and understand Air Hygiene Incorporated's QA manual; 4. In-house training and QA meetings on a regular basis;and 5. Maintenance of training records. Knowledge of Current Test Methods With the constant updating of standard test methods and the wide variety of emerging test procedures,it is essential that any qualified source tester keep abreast of new developments. AIR HYGIENE subscribes to services, which provide updates on EPA reference methods,rules,and regulations. Additionally, source test personnel regularly attend and present papers at testing and emission-related seminars and conferences. COMBUSTION TESTING QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES A number of quality assurance activities are undertaken before, during, and after each testing project. The following paragraphs detail the quality control techniques,which are rigorously followed during testing projects. Each instrument's response will be checked and adjusted in the field prior to the collection of data via multi-point calibration. The instrument's linearity will be checked by first adjusting its zero and span responses to zero nitrogen and an upscale calibration gas in the range of the expected concentrations. The instrument response will then be challenged with other calibration gases of known concentration and accepted as being linear if the response of the other calibration gases agrees within plus or minus 2 percent of range of the predicted values. After each test run, the analyzers will be checked for zero and span drift. This allowed each test run to be bracketed by calibrations and documents the precision of the data just collected. The criteria for acceptable data are that the instrument drift is no more than 3 percent of the full-scale response. Quality assurance worksheets will be prepared to document the multipoint calibration checks and zero to span checks performed during the tests. The sampling systems will be leak checked by demonstrating that a vacuum greater than 10 in Hg can be held for at least 1 minute with a decline of less than 1 in. Hg. A leak test will be conducted after the sample system is set up and before the system is dismantled. This test will be conducted to ensure that ambient air has not diluted the sample. Any leakage detected prior to the tests will be repaired and another leak check conducted before testing commences. The absence of leaks in the sampling system will also be verified by a sampling system bias check. The sampling system's integrity will be tested by comparing the responses of the analyzers to the calibration gases introduced via two paths. The first path will be directly into the analyzer and the second path will be via the sample system at the sample probe. Any difference in the instrument responses by these two methods will be attributed to sampling system bias or leakage. The criteria for acceptance will be agreement within 5 percent of the span of the analyzer. The control gases used to calibrate the instruments will be analyzed and certified by the compressed gas vendors to± 1% accuracy for all gases. EPA Protocol No. 1 will be used where applicable to assign the concentration values traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology(MIST), Standard Reference Materials. AIR HYGIENE maintains a large variety of calibration gases to allow the flexibility to accurately test emissions over a wide range of concentrations. APPENDIX B TEST EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION AND DESCRIPTION INSTRUMENT CONFIGURATION AND OPERATIONS FOR GAS ANALYSIS The sampling and analysis procedures to be used conform with the methods outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Methods 1, 2, 3A,4, 5, 7E, 10, 18, 19, and 25A; 40 CFR 51, Appendix M, 202; and 40 CFR 63,Appendix A,Method 320. The sample system to be used for the real-time gas analyzer tests is configured per the following description. A stainless steel probe will be inserted near the center of the stack. The gas sample will be continuously pulled through the probe and transported via 3/8-inch heat-traced Teflon® tubing to a stainless steel, minimum-contact condenser designed to dry the sample and then through Teflon®tubing via a stainless steel/Teflon®diaphragm pump and into the sample manifold within the mobile laboratory. From the manifold, the sample is partitioned to the real-time gas analyzer through rotameters that control the flow rate of the sample. Exhaust samples are routed to the wet based analyzer prior to gas conditioning. The schematic (Figure 1) shows that the sample system is also equipped with a separate path through which a calibration gas could be delivered to the probe and back through the entire sampling system. This allows for convenient performance of system bias checks as required by the testing methods. All instruments are housed in an air-conditioned, trailer-mounted mobile laboratory. Gaseous calibration standards are provided in aluminum cylinders with the concentrations certified by the vendor according to EPA Protocol No. 1. This general schematic also illustrates the analyzers to be used for the tests (i.e., 02, CO). All data from the Reference Method continuous monitoring instruments are recorded on a Logic Beach Hyperlogger. The Hyperlogger retrieves calibrated emissions data from each instrument every second. An average value is recorded every 30 seconds. The stack gas analysis for 02 and CO2 concentrations will be performed in accordance with procedures set forth in EPA Method 3A. The 02 analyzer uses a paramagnetic cell detector and the CO2 analyzer uses a continuous nondispersive infrared analyzer. EPA Method 7e will be used to determine concentrations of NOx. A chemiluminescence analyzer will be used to provide the analysis. A NO2 in nitrogen certified gas cylinder will be used to verify at least a 90 percent NO2 conversion on the day of the test. Method 320,utilizing an FTIR may also be used for the analysis. CO emission concentrations will be quantified in accordance with procedures set forth in EPA Method 10 or 320. A continuous nondispersive infrared(NDIR) analyzer will be used for this purpose. Method 320, utilizing an FTIR may also be used for the analysis. VOC emission concentrations will be quantified in accordance with principles set forth in EPA Method 18. A VIG 210 will be used for this purpose. The VIG 210 includes both a conventional total hydrocarbon(THC) analyzer and an automated gas chromatograph (GC) for determining VOCs. Two FID (flame ionization detectors) are used for the measurements: one for the THC channel and the other for the automated GC which can measure methane, ethane, and residual (VOCs). The THC sample is injected directly to the FID. This detector responds to all hydrocarbons in the sample. NH3 emission concentrations will be quantified in accordance with principles set forth in EPA Method 320. A FTIR will be used for the analysis. Figure 2 represents the sample system used for the PM10i2.5 tests. A heated probe will be inserted into the sample ports of the stack to extract gas measurements from the emission stream through a filter, condenser and dry glass impinger train. Flow rates will be monitored with oil filled manometers and total sample volumes were measured with dry gas meters. E:\SHARED\DRAWINGS\EMISSIONS TESTING LAB.PPT 04/18/08 DRAWING:08-001 TKG COPYRIGHT©2011 AIR HYGIENE INTERNATIONAL INC. w D ' Heated Teflon Tubing (pre-conditioned sample) m0 I :: I jtS Z Unheated Teflon Tubing (conditioned sample) -ryas _C L,L ri = r W 0- .__.� m -U 010 Diluted Calibration Gas Lu J m pop Q .J Calibration Gas Q "' °� 0Y m — 00 w 0- m ♦•■■■■■■■■■■■■■♦ Electronic Input/Output = TEST TRAILER EXTERIOR (n ZJ 0 � � ................TEST TRAILER INTERIOR.......................................... � z 0 m Z. m _ DATA w X � � v RECORDER D w ° W r ~ a CID y MOBILE s ; s 0 J5 E SECONDARY ANALYZERS : ■■■■■■�� ■.............. Q is MANIFOLD O ■ S c t!{ � � J _0 0`7 ■ ■ T................*....... THC, VOC 02, CO2, NOx, : GAS DILUTER _ _ Wh CO, SO2 ........ .....................» 0 ■ Al e HOT/WET ANALYZERS S COLD/DRY ANALYZERS s ' ° 0 COLD/DRY ............ .................. ...» � ANALYZERS HOT/WET _ z ®® z . ®� 0 ■ U) 02, CO2, NOx, CO, S02 • w ■ z J THC, VOC O � FTIR F_ O PRIMARY 0 Of co ANALYZERS Figure 1 z = CO Q J U EMISSIONS TESTING LAB �,c .• U Q o 1600 W Tacoma Street o _ z in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 m VENT; VENT 16•• � ••., www.airhygiene.com ••........................ ..................................................................... (888)461-8778 Shown full equipped. Some labs may not contain these features and others may contain additional features specific to certain scopes. A 1 R HYGIENE E:\SHARED\DRAWINGS\SAMPLINGTRAIN.PPT 01/05/18 DRAWING:18-001 TKG COPYRIGHT©2009 AIR HYGIENE INTERNATIONAL INC. Temperature Sensor _ 4 Probe Temperature ----- —, --h t P77 , Type S Pitot Tube (ere and �- '` - View of Probe End multiple CPM Wet Chemistry Assembly (from the bottom) locations) Filter (photo) Temperature Liner Vertical Holder Sensor Stack (glass) 4-1 Condenser Wa With Probe Dropout Sheath Nozzle (heated) I F Glass Filter Type S Pitot Holder Vacuum Tube - Line Heated Area Ice Oil-Filler Water Bath Manometer Recirc. Impingers Hot Box pump Vacuum Split Cold Box Gauge Orifice \ 7 By-pass Main Valve Valve Dry Gas7 Figure 2 Meter k RM5 / 202 ASSEMBLY OAir-Tight 1600 W Tacoma Street Oil-Filler Pump Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 Manometer www.airhygiene.com AIR HYGIENE (888) 461-8778 TABLE 1: ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTATION Parameter Model and Common Sensitivity Detection Principle Manufacturer Use Ranges 02 Servomex or 0-25% 0.1% Oxygen-Paramagnetic cell equivalent CO2 FUJI 3300 or 0-20% 0.1% Nondispersive infrared equivalent NOx TECO 42C or 0-5,000 ppm 0.1 ppm Thermal reduction of NO2 to equivalent NO. Chemiluminescence of reaction of NO with 03. Detection by PMT. Inherently linear for listed ranges. CO TECO 48C or 0-10,000 0.1 ppm Infrared absorption, gas filter equivalent ppm correlation detector, microprocessor based linearization. VOC VIG 210 or User may 0.1 ppm Gas Chromatography and equivalent select up to Flame Ionization Detector 3,000 ppm NH3 and MKS Multigas User may 0.04 ppm Fourier Transform Infrared Alternatives 2030 or select up to Spectroscopy equivalent 1,100 ppm TABLE 2: ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTATION TESTING CONFIGURATION Parameter Sample Example Calibration Gases(based Methodology Range on example range) 02 3A 0-21% Zero=0 ppm nitrogen Mid=8.4— 12.6% High=21% CO2 3A 0-20% Zero=0 ppm nitrogen Mid=8— 12% High=20% NOx 7E 0-1000 ppm Zero=0 ppm nitrogen Mid=400—600 ppm High= 1000 ppm CO 10 0-1000 ppm Zero=0 ppm nitrogen Mid=400—600 ppm High= 1000 ppm THCNOCs 18 and 25A 0-100 ppm Zero=0 ppm nitrogen (as propane) Low=25—35 ppm Mid=45—55 ppm High= 80—90 ppm APPENDIX C STACK DRAWINGS METHOD 1-ISOKINETIC TRAVERSE FOR A CIRCULAR SOURCE Company City of Denton Date 2018 Plant Name Denton Energy Center Project Project#bv-1 8-denton.tx-start#2 Equipment Wartsila 18V50SG #of Ports Available 2 Location Denton,Texas #of Ports Used 12 Circular Stack or Duct Diameter D Distance to Far Wall of Stack (Lfw) 71.50 in. N r h Distance to Near Wall of Stack (L°w) 8.00 in.* Diameter of Stack (D) 63.50 in. Lfw 71.5 in. Area of Stack (AS) 21.99 ft2 *assume 8 in.reference(must be measured and verified in field) C Distance from Disturbances to Port D= 63.5 in. Distance Upstream (A) 89.00 in. Diameters Upstream (AD) 1.40 diameters A Distance Downstream (B) 392.27 in. L°w 8.0 in. Diameters Downstream (BD) 6.18 diameters Number of Traverse Points Required Diameters to Minimum Number of Minimum Number of B Flow Disturbance Traverse Points Traverse Points Down(BD) Up(AD) Particulate Velocity Comp Stratification Stream Stream Points Points Criteria Points 2.00-4.99 0.50-1.24 24 16 U RM 7E 8.1.2 12 RM1 pts c o 5.00-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 16 nn TE 8.1.z 3 points f Tsi 6.00-6.99 1.50-1.74 16 12 A= 7.4 ft. 0 ° a 3 7.00-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12 AD= 1.4 dia. o >=8.00 1 —2.00 8 or 122 8 or 122 Minimum Number of ° Upstream Spec 20 16 Traverse Points R 0 Downstream Spec 16 12 RATA Stratification 0 Traverse Pts Required 20 16 E75abrv Points B= 32.7 ft. a 'Check Minimum Number of Points for the Upstream 12 RM1 pts BD= 6.2 dia. v m and Downstream conditions,then use the largest. 3 points328 for Circular Stacks 12 to 24 inches 6 points 12 for Circular Stacks over 24 inches Number of Traverse Points Used 2 Ports by 10 Pts/port Isokinetic Traverse(Wet 20 Pts Used 20 Required Chemistry Testing) Traverse Point Locations Traverse Percent of Distance Distance Point Stack from Including Number Diameter Inside Wall Reference Length • % in. in. 1 2.6% 1 5/8 9 5/8 • 2 8.2% 5 2/8 13 2/8 3 14.6% 9 2/8 17 2/8 49 8 • 4 22.6% 14 3/8 22 3/8 2 618 5 34.2% 21 6/8 29 6/8 2 318 • 6 65.8% 41 6/8 49 6/8 1721 7 77.4% 49 1/8 57 1/8 1132 • 8 85.4% 54 2/8 62 2/8 5/ 9 91.8% 58 2/8 66 2/8 571 8 1 10 97.4% 61 7/8 69 7/8 622 • 11 66 2/ 12 9 7/8 13 14 • 15 16 17 • 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 by-18-denton.tx-start#2-P MTrav METHOD 1-STRATIFICATION TEST FOR A CIRCULAR SOURCE Company City of Denton Date 2018 Plant Name Denton Energy Center Project Project#bv-1 8-denton.tx-start#2 Equipment Wartsila 18V50SG #of Ports Available 2 Location Denton,Texas #of Ports Used 12 Circular Stack or Duct Diameter D Distance to Far Wall of Stack (Lfw) 71.50 in. N r h Distance to Near Wall of Stack (L�w) 8.00 in.* Diameter of Stack (D) 63.50 in. Lfw 71.5 in. Area of Stack (AS) 21.99 ft2 *assume 8 in.reference(must be measured and verified in field) C Distance from Disturbances to Port D= 63.5 in. Distance Upstream (A) 89.00 in. Diameters Upstream (AD) 1.40 diameters A Distance Downstream (B) 392.27 in. L,w 8.0 in. Diameters Downstream (BD) 6.18 diameters Number of Traverse Points Required Diameters to Minimum Number of Minimum Number of B Flow Disturbance Traverse Points Traverse Points Down(BD) Up(AD) Particulate Velocity Comp Stratification Stream Stream Points Points Criteria Points 2.00-4.99 0.50-1.24 24 16 RM 7E 8.1.2 12 RM1 pts c o 5.00-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 16 nn TE 8.1.z 3 points f Tsi 6.00-6.99 1.50-1.74 16 12 12 points A 7.4 ft. ° a 3 7.00-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12 AD= 1.4 dia. o >=8.00 1 —2.00 8 or 122 8 or 122 Minimum Number of 0 Upstream Specl 20 1 16 Traverse Points Downstream Specl 16 1 12 RATA Stratification Traverse Pts Requiredl 20 1 16 Criteria Points B= 32.7 ft. a Check Minimum Number of Points for the Upstream 0 Part75/60 12 RM1 pts BD= 6.2 dia. v m and Downstream conditions,then use the largest. 075 abry(a) 3 points 3 g 2 8 for Circular Stacks 12 to 24 inches 0 75 abry(b) 6 points 12 for Circular Stacks over 24 inches Number of Traverse Points Used 2 Ports by 6 Pts/port Stratification Traverse 12 Pts Used 12 Required (Compliance Test) Traverse Point Locations Traverse Percent of Distance Distance Point Stack from Including Number Diameter Inside Wall Reference Length • % in. in. 1 4.4% 2 6/8 10 6/8 • 2 14.6% 9 2/8 17 2/8 3 29.6% 18 6/8 26 6/8 686 4 70.4% 44 6/8 52 6/8 62 /8 5 85.4% 54 2/8 62 2/8 618 6 95.6% 60 6/8 68 6/8 6 618 7 171/8 8 10 /8 9 10 11 12 13 • 14 15 16 • 17 18 • 19 20 21 22 23 24 by-18-denton.tx-start#2-Strat APPENDIX D EXAMPLE TEMPLATES AND CALCULATIONS ENGINE TEST - FIELD DATA SHEET AIR HVGIEIVIs Company: OZ NOx CO THC COZ SOZ Location: CYLINDER Low SERIAL Date: NUMBERS Mid Unit Make and Model: High Unit Number: Serial Number: NO2 CONVERSION Stack Dia._ Data Recorded By: NOZ Gas(ppm) Measured By: Tested With AHI Unit(s): Truck(s): Trailer(s): NO Reading(ppm) Measured With: LDEQ Warmup/Cal Req: On(Day/Time): Cal(Day/Time): NOx Reading(ppm) Cylinder Num RUN INFORMATION Run#1 Run#2 Run#3 Run#4 Average REPORT INFORMATION Time Start(hh:mm:ss) INSTRUMENT SERIAL# Time Stop(hh:mm:ss) OZ Barometric Pressure(in.Hg) NOx Ambient Temperature(°F) CO Relative Humidity(%) THC Suction Pressure(psig) CO2 Discharge Pressure(psig) SO2 Rated Horsepower(hp) Actual Horsepower(hp) RESPONSE TIME Fuel Flow(SCF/hr) TIME(hh:mm) RESP(min) Turbo Speed(npt)or(rpm) Gas Inject / / Engine Speed(npg)or(rpm) 1"Inst.@ 95% / / / Air Manifold Temperature(°F) 2nd Inst.@ 95% / / Air Manifold Pressure(psig or in.Hg) 3'd Inst.@ 95% / / / Engine Timing BTDC CALIBRATION 02 NOx CO THC COZ Conc. Actual Conc. Actual Conc. Actual Conc. Actual Conc. Actual Zero Gas Low Gas Mid Gas High Gas BIAS OZ NOx CO THC COZ Zero Mid Zero Mid Zero Mid Zero Mid Zero Mid Initial/Run#1 Run#1IRun#2 Run#2/Run#3 Run#3IRun#4 Run#4/Final Bias Gas Actual Conc. Air Permit#: Plant Name or Location: Date: Project Number: Manufacturer&Equipment: Model: Serial Number: Unit Number: Test Load: Tester(s)/Test Unit(s): RUN UNITS 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 Start Time hh:mm:ss End Time hh:mm:ss Bar. Pressure in.Hg Amb.Temp. °F Rel.Humidity Spec.Humidity lb water/lb air Comb.Inlet Pres. psig NOx Water Inj. gpm Total Fuel Flow SCFH Heat Input MMBtu/hr Power Output megawatts Steam Rate Ib/hr Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 Client: Location: Date: Project#: Natural Gas-Fuel Analysis Standardized to 68 deg F and 14.696 psia-EPA Standards Lbs ° Molecular' Component Wt.%of Ideal Gross''' Fuel Heat Ideal Net''' Fuel Heat Gas Component Mole(/°) Weight per Lb-Mole Component Heating Value Value[HHV] Heating Value Value[LHV] (lb/lb-mole) (Btu/ft') (Btu/SCF) (Btu/ft') (Btu/SCF) of Gas Methane CH4 Ethane CZHS Propane C31-18 iso-Butane C4H10 n-Butane nC41-110 Iso-Pentane C5H12 in-Pentane nC51-112 Hexanes C61-114 Heptanes C71-116 Octanes C81-118 Carbon Dioxide CO2 Nitrogen NZ Hydrogen Sulfide 1-12S Oxygen 02 Helium He Hydrogen HZ Totals I dryl I dry wet2'1 wet2,1 Characteristics of Fuel Gas Component Wt% Molecular Weight of gas= Ib/Ib-mole carbon Btu per lb.of gas4= gross(HHV) oxygen Btu per lb.of gas4= net(LHV) hydrogen Density of fuel gas2= lb/cu.ft nitrogen Wt%VOC in fuel gas= % helium Specific Gravity'= sulfur Total F-Factor(SCF dry exhaust per MMBtu[HHV])_ (Based on EPA RM-19)at 68 deg F and 14.696 psia F-Factor Calculation: F-Factor=1,000,000*((3.64*%H)+(1.53*%C)+(0.57*%S)+(0.14*%N)-(0.46*%O))/GCV GCV=Gross Btu per lb.of gas(HHV) %H,%C,%S,%N,&%O are percent weight values calculated from fuel analysis and have units of(scf/lb)/% Density of natural gas based on specific gravity multiplied by density of air at 68 deg F and 14.696 psia. References: 'ASTM D 3588 2 Civil Engineering Reference Manual,7th ed.-Michael R.Lindeburg 3 Mark's Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers,10th ed.-Eugene A.Avallone,Theodore Baumeister III 4 Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,3rd ed.-William S.Janna 5 GPA Reference Bulletin 181-86,revised 1986,reprinted 1995 Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 Calibration Date: Client: THERMO 42H(NOx Analyzer)Linearity Plot 1.20 d 1.00 NOx Span(ppm)_ °o. THERMO 42H(NOx Analyzer) E0.80 Certified Instrument Calibration Absolute Pass or no.60 d- Concentration Response Error Cone. Fall( 2%, E 0.40 (Ppm) (PP-) (%) (Ppm) 50.5ppm) N 0.20 c 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 Certified Concentrations(ppm) Linearity= API 300(CO Analyzer)Linearity Plot E 1.20 a 1.00 CO Span(ppm)_ API 300(CO Analyzer) o 0.80 Certified Instrument Calibration Absolute Pass or 0.60 Concentration Response Error Conc. Fail( 2%, w 0.40 (ppm) (Ppm) N (ppm) 50.5ppm) E 0.20 S m .S 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1,20 Certified Concentrations(ppm) Linearity= SERVOMEX 1400(02 Analyzer)Linearity Plot 1.20 4 1.00 02 Span(%)= c om 0.80 SERVOMEX 1400(02 Analyzer) N Certified Instrument Calibration Absolute Pass or fY 0.60 Concentration Response Error Conc. Fail( 2%, y 0.40 (ppm) (ppm) N (ppm) 150.5%) E 0.20 N 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 Certified Concentrations(%) Linearity= THERMO 51(THC Analyzer)Linearity Plot THC Range(ppm)= d 1.20 THERMO 51(THC Analyzer) a 1.00 Certified Instrument Calibration Estimated Pass or d„0.80 Concentration Response Error Point Fail n 0.60 (Ppm) (ppm) N (ppm) ( 2,5%)1 d�'0.40 E 0.20 5 0.00 0.00 0.20 OAO 0.60 0,80 1.00 1,20 Certified Concentrations(ppm) Linearity= 1-zero/high based on 2%of span,low/mid based on 5%of concentration FUJI 3300(CO2 Analyzer)Linearity Plot 1.20 d 1.00 CO2 Span(%)_ FUJI 3300(CO2 Analyzer) g 0.80 Certified Instrument Calibration Absolute Pass or rx 0.60 Concentration Response Error Cone. Fail( 2%, E 0 (Ppm) (Ppm) N (ppm) <_0.5%) 2 0 o.4 .40 c 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 Certified Concentrations(%) Linearity= Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 NOx Converter Efficiency Date: Analyzer: RM 7E, (08-15-06), 8.2.4.1 Introduce a concentration of 40 to 60 ppmv NO2 to the analyzer in direct calibration mode and record the NOx concentration displayed by the analyzer. ... Calculate the converter efficiency using Equation 7E-7 in Section 12.7. The specification for converter efficiency in Section 13.5 must be met. ... The NO 2 must be prepared according to the EPA Traceability Protocol and have an accuracy within 2.0 percent. Audit Gas: NO2 Concentration (Cv), ppmvd Converter Efficiency Calculations: Analyzer Reading, NO Channel, ppmvd Analyzer Reading, NOx Channel, ppmvd Analyzer Reading, NO2 Channel (CDir(NO2)), ppmvd Converter Efficiency, % RM 7E, (08-15-06), 13.5 NO2 to NO Conversion Efficiency Test (as applicable). The NO2 to NO conversion efficiency, calculated according to Equation 7E-7 or Equation 7E-9, must be greater than or equal to 90 percent. E ffNO2 = CD`, x 100 Eq. 7E-7 = ppmvd x 100 = CV ppmvd Date/Time Elapsed Time NOx NO mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss Seconds ppmvd ppmvd Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v2.1 Fuel Data Weather Data Fuel Fa factor SCF/MMBtu I I Barometric Pressure in.Hg Fuel Heating Value(HHV) Btu/SCF j Relative Humidity Ambient Temperature °F Specific Humidity Ib Hi0/Ib air Unit Data Unit Load megawatts Heat Input Ib/MMBtu Steam Rate Steam Ib/hr Combustor Inlet Pres. psig NOx Control Water Injection gpm Est.Stack Moisture Stack Exhaust Flow(M2) SCFH Stack Exhaust Flow(M19) SCFH Run-1 Date/Time Elapsed Time 02 NOx CO (mm/dd/yy hh:mm:ss) (seconds) M) (ppmvd) (ppmvd) RAW AVERAGE 02 NOx CO Serial Number: M (ppmvd) (ppmvd) Initial Zero Final Zero m Avg.Zero m m Initial Upscale Final UpScale Avg.UpScale Upscale Cal Gas EMISSIONS DATA 02 NOx CO Corrected Raw Average(ppm/%dry basis) Corrected Raw Average(ppm/%wet basis) Concentration(ppm@%Oi ) Concentration(ppm@%Oi &ISO) Emission Rate(lb/hr) Emission Rate(tons/day)at 24 hr/day Emission Rate(tons/year)at SO hrlyr Emission Rate(lb/MMBtu) Emission Rate(g/hp'hr) Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI 0.3 DRIFT AND BIAS CHECK Run - 1 02 NOx CO Raw Average Corrected Average Initial Zero Final Zero Avg.Zero Initial UpScale Final UpScale Avg. UpScale Sys Resp(Zero) Sys Resp(Upscale) Upscale Cal Gas Initial Zero Bias Final Zero Bias Zero Drift Initial Upscale Bias Final Upscale Bias Upscale Drift o Initial Zero >_ o Final Zero Y Initial Upscale Q U Q Final Upscale Calibration Span 3%of Range (drift) 5%of Range(bias) DRIFT AND BIAS CHECK Run -2 02 NOx CO Raw Average Corrected Average Initial Zero Final Zero Avg.Zero Initial UpScale Final UpScale Avg. UpScale Sys Resp(Zero) Sys Resp(Upscale) Upscale Cal Gas Initial Zero Bias Final Zero Bias Zero Drift Initial Upscale Bias Final Upscale Bias Upscale Drift Initial Zero .o Q E _U Final Zero y w Initial Upscale Q a Final Upscale Calibration Span 3%of Range (drift) 5%of Range(bias) Comp&RATA&Eng-AH 10.3 EMISSION CALCULATIONS SUMMARY TABLES Company: Date: Engine Tested: Location: Engine Serial #: Stack Gas Flow Rate: Method 19 Test# Brake OZ COnc.(%) Fuel Heating value F Factor-Dry Oxy. Fuel Flow Stack Flow Horsepower (Btu/SCF) (DSCFex/MMBtu) (SCF/hr) (SCF/hr) 1 2 3 Average NOx Mass Emission Rate Test# Brake NOx Conc. MW E /h *hr E Ib/hr E ton/ r Ib/MMBtu Horsepower (ppmvd) (g p ) ( ) ( Y ) E( ) 1 46.01 2 46.01 3 46.01 Average i i 46.01 CO Mass Emission Rate Test# Brake CO Conc. MW E /h *hr E Ib/hr E ton/ r Ib/MMBtu Horsepower (ppmvd) (g p ) ( ) ( Y ) E( ) 1 28.00 2 28.00 3 28.00 Average i i 28.00 Fuel Flow(Btu/hp•hr)is based upon the worst case assumption of 8,500 Btu/hp•hr fuel usage when site data for fuel flow is not available. Comp&RATA&Eng-AH 10.3 TABLE 2.1: ENGINE EMISSIONS REPORT Test Period: Air Permit Number: Location: Unit Number: Date: Suction Pressure(psi): Project Number: Discharge Pressure(psi): Engine Manufacturer: Stack Exhaust Temperature(°F): Engine Model: Rated Horsepower(hp): Engine Serial Number: Brake Horsepower(bhp): Analyzer Manufacturers: TECO(NOx),API(CO),TECO(THC) Engine Fuel Flow(SCFH): Analyzer Model Numbers: 42H,300,51 Specific Gravity: Date Analyzers Calibrated: Fuel Heating Value[HHV](Btu/SCF): Emission Test Results: Appendix A BSFC(Btu/hp'hr): Analyzer Data Plots: Appendix B Annual Hours Allowed to Operate: 8,760 Cal Gas Spec.Sheets: Appendix C Engine Speed(rpm): Quality Control Data Sheets: Appendix D Air Manifold Temp ff): Chromatograph Report: Appendix E Air Manifold Pressure(psi): Ambient Temperature(°F): Turbo Speed(rpm): Barometric Pressure(in.Hg): Engine Ignition Timing(°BTDC): Relative Humidity(%): Load Step: Emission Test Results Torque(%): Pollutant(units) Stack Test Results Permit Limits Passing_ Tested By:Air Hygiene International,Inc. NOx (avg. ppmvd) CO (avg. ppmvd) VOC (avg. ppmvd) NOx @15%02 02(avg. ppmvd) CO @15%02 02(avg. ppmvd) VOC @15%02 02(avg. ppmvd) NOx (avg. lb/hr) CO (avg. lb/hr) VOC (avg. lb/hr) NOx (avg. g/hp*hr) CO (avg. g/hp*hr) VOC (avg. g/hp*hr) All testing conducted according to United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), Methods: 7e, 10 and 25a. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v2.4 EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(FFACTOR) RM 19,(07-19-06), Mark's Std Hdbk,10th ed.,pg 4-26 2.0 Summary of Method, High Heat Value Dry(HHVdry),calc for Methane(single component for the fuel gas) 2.1 Emission Rates.Oxygen(02) or carbon dioxide(CO2) K o % Btu Btu concentrations and appropriate F HHVdry Btu/SCF _ J x GCM J HHVdry= x = factors(ratios of combustion gas 100 J 100.00 SCF SCF volumes to heat inputs)are used to calculate pollutant emission rates from pollutant cc Mark's Std Hdbk,10th ed.,pg 4-26 Low Heat Value Dry(LHVdry),calc for Methane(single component for the fuel gas) RM 19,(07-19-06), r(Mao % Btu Btu 12.2 Emission Rates of PM, LHV dry Btu/SCF =LI 1 x NCM J LHVdry= x - S02,and NOx. Select from the `100 l 100.00 SCF SCF following sections the applicable procedure to compute the PM, S02,or NOx emission rate(E)in Civil Eng.Ref.Man.,7th Ed.,pg 14-9/GPA Ref.Bulletin 181-86,App.C Ib/MMBtu.The pollutant High Heat Value Wet HHV concentration must be in Ib/scf g ( wec),calc for entire sample(all components of the fuel gas) and the F factor must be in scf/MMBtu.If the pollutant HHV.t(Btu/SCF)= HHVdry HHVw t= Btu/SCF = Btu/SCF concentration(C)is not in the W/D.factor appropriate units,use Table 19-1 in Section 17.0 to make the proper conversion.An F factor is Civil Eng.Ref.Man.,7th Ed.,pg 14-9/GPA Ref.Bulletin 181-86,App.C the ratio of the gas volume of the products of combustion to the Low Heat Value Wet(LHV,e1),calc for entire sample(all components of the fuel gas) heat content of the fuel.The dry F factor(Fd)includes all LHV e (Btu/SCF)= LHVdry LHVNe`_ Btu/SCF Btu/SCF - components of combustion less W/D.factor water,the wet F factor(F.) includes all components of combustion,and the carbon F Lbs Component per Lb-Mol of Gas(CM),calc for Methane(single component for the fuel gas) factor(F j includes only carbon dioxide. CM Qb/lb-mol�_ 100 x MW CM= % x lb = Ib/lb-mol 100.00 lb-mol ASTM D 3588 Btu per Lb of Gas Gross(GCV) Fuel Molecular Weight(MWFueI) GCV Btu/lb)= HHVdry x G1 MWFUe,(lb/lb•mol�= (CM MWF-1- lb/lb-mol L MWFueI J + Ib/lb-mol GCV- Btu/SCF x ft3/lbmol = Btu/lb +etc.= Ib/lb-mol Ib/lb-mol ASTM D 3588(SG) MW SG Ib/lb-mol Btu per Lb of Gas Net(NCV)FUe = - 1LHVdry xG1 Specific Gravity SG= 28.96 Ib/Ib-mol NCV Btu/lb�-L J MWA�R _ MWFueI NCV- Btu/SCF x ft3/Ibmol = Btu/lb Ib/lb-mol Weight Percent of Colmponen1t(C%),methane CM C%(%)=[(MWF.,l Ix100 RM 19,(07-19-06),Weight Percent of Volatile Organic Compounds(VOC%) J _ Ib/lb-mol [CaH'a C Ib/lb-mol x 100 = % VOC i(%)= Y,M i VOC%_ % + % + % + etc.= % C3H, RM 19,(07-19-06),12.3.2 Determined F Factors.If the fuel burned is not listed in Table 19-2 or if the owner or operator chooses to determine an F factor rather than use the values in Table 19-2,use the procedure below:12.3.2.1 Equations.Use the eq RM 19,(07-19-6), F - K(K,,d%H+Ke%C+KS%S+K %N-Ko%O) E 19-13 12.1 Nomenclature d GCV q K(scVlb)/% H 3.64 _ 106Btu �3.64 SCF 1.53 SCF 0.57 SCF x % + C 1.53 Fd Mi x x % + x % +lb'% lb'% lb % S 0.57 N2 0.14 0.14 SCF ° 0.46 SCF ° lb SCF 02 0.46 lb % x % lb % x % x Btu MMBtu Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(INFORMATION) Specific Humidity(RHgp) Note:RHsp(gr/lb)calculated using temperature,relative humidity,and barometric pressure with psychrometric chart,psychrometric calculator,or built in psychrometric algorithm. RH n(lb/lb) gr x lb( RH SP_ gr I lb _ lb H2O lb) 7000 gr lb x 7000 gr lb Air Fuel Flow Conversion(Of) Note:Qf(lb/min)is a value uptained from the source operator. xC,x MW 1 Fuel lb-mol Qf -[Qf Qr_ lb x 60 min min h x lb-mol ft 3 x lb = SCFH Combustor Inlet Pressure/Compressor Discharge Pressure(CIP/CDP) Note:CIP/CDP(psig)is a value obtained (corrected from gauge to atmospheric pres.and conv.to mm Hg.) from the source operator. CIP/CDP = (psig+P)x 51.71493 mmHg 51.71493 mmHg 1psi CIP/CDP= psig+ x =1 psia mmHg(abs) Heat Rate(MMBtu/hr) HHVDRY x Qt HR = Btu SCF MMBtu MMBtu 1,000,000 Heat Rate= SCF x hr x 10'Btu hr Estimated Stack Gas Moisture Content(Bws) 2XQ Bws(%) = j x 100 Bws= 2 x SCF x hr x 100= QS hr SCF Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(CALIBRATION) Analyzer Calibration Error RM 7E,(08-15-06),12.2 Analyzer Calibration Error. For non-dilution systems,use Equation 7E-1 to calculate the analyzer calibration error for the low-, mid-,and high-level calibration gases.(calc for analyzer mid gas,if applicable) ACE = C°' -Cv x 100 Eq.7E-1 ACE= ppm ppm x 100= CS ppm Calibration Error and Estimated Point,RM 25A,THC Analyzer RM 25A,(07-19-06),8.4 Calibration Error Test.Immediately prior to the test series(within 2 hours of the start of the test),introduce zero gas and high- level calibration gas at the calibration valve assembly.Adjust the analyzer output to the appropriate levels,if necessary.Calculate the predicted response for the low-level and mid-level gases based on a linear response line between the zero and high-level response.Then introduce low-level and mid-level calibration gases successively to the measurement system....These differences must be less than 5 percent of the respective calibration gas value.(calc for THC analyzer mid gas,if applicable) __ CDIr(H)-CDir(z) Eq.of a Tine _ ppm- ppm Er Cp(H _CY(z x CD�r(vt +CDir(Z) y=mx+b Ep ppm- ppm x ppm+ = ppm ACE = CA( S Cv x 100 E 7E-1 ACE THC ppm- ppm CS q' rHc- PP x 100= m Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(BIAS,DRIFT,AND CORRECTED RAW AVERAGE) System Bias RM 7E,(08-15-06),12.3 System Bias. For non-dilution systems,use Equation 7E-2 to calculate the system bias separately for the low-level and upscale calibration gases.(calc for analyzer upscale gas,Run 1 initial bias,if applicable) SB=r Cs CS D'r J x 100 Eq.7E-2 SB= ppm- ppmppm x 100= % Drift Assessment RM 7E,(08-15-06),12.5 Drift Assessment. Use Equation 7E-4 to separately calculate the low-level and upscale drift over each test run.(calc for analyzer upscale drift,Run 1,if applicable) D= SB fna[ —SB, Eq.7E-4 D= % - % _ % Alternative Drift and Bias RM 7E,(08-15-06),13.2/13.3 System Bias and Drift.Alternatively,the results are acceptable if JCs—Cdirl iss 0.5 ppmv or if JCs—CvJ is<—0.5 ppmv (as applicable).(calc for analyzer initial upscale,Run 1,if applicable) SB/DArr = Cs —CD,r I Eq.Section 13.2 and 13.3 SB/DAlt= ppm- ppm = ppm Bias Adjusted Average RM 7E,(08-15-06),12.6 Effluent Gas Concentration. For each test run,calculate Cavg,the arithmetic average of all valid concentration values(e.g.,1• minute averages). Then adjust the value of Cavg for bias,using Equation 7E-5.(calc for analyzer,Run 1,if applicable) Cc. =(CAvg —Co)x C CvAC J Eq.7E 5 CGas= ppm ppm]. ppm ppm Ppm 1 ppm l M O I` EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(BSFC) Using HHV with Qf(SCFH) Using LHV with Qf(Btu/hp*hr) HHV x Qr BSFC(Btu/hp•hr)=Q7 BSFC(Btu/hp hr)= bhp Btu Btu Btu SCF 1 Btu BSFC= hp*hr hp*hr BSFC= SCF x hr x hp hp*hr Using LHV with Qf(SCFH) Using HHV with Qf(Btu/hp*hr) BSFC(Btu/hp•hr)=LHV x Q f BSFC(Btu/hp•hr)=Qt x HHV bhp LHV BSFC= Btu X SCFX 1 — Btu BSFC= N/A Btu x Btu x scf — Btu SCF hr hp hp*hr hp*hr SCF Btu hp*hr EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(Emissions based on Table 29 values) Emission Rate(lb/hr) Ehp x bh Qf(Btu/hp*hr)) E(lb/hr)= gr 45 p 453.6 g lb lb E(lb/hr)= hp*hr x 453.6 g x hp hr Emission Rate(g/hp-hr) 1 1 453 .6 20.9% Qf(Btu/hp*hr)) E(g/hp -hr)=CRA x Q x FFactor x MW x x x x f 106 106 G 20.9% —CRAG Btu SCF lb 1 parts 1 MMBtu E(g/hp-hr)= ppm x x x x x hp*hr MMBtu lb-mol 106 ppm 10'Btu 453.6 g lb-mol 20.9% g x x x = lb SCF 20.9%- % hp*hr Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 App.A EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(RUNS) Stack Exhaust Flow(Qs)-RM19 SCF SCF Btu Qs =(FFactor x Qf x HHV)x 20.9% QSMMBtu x hr x SCF 1,000,000 Il 20.9%-Cc-(oz) JI Note:Equation presented in EPA Emission Measurement Center(EMC), x MMBtu x 20.90% = SCFH Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)for Method 19 106 Btu L 20.9%- NOz Conversion Efficiency Correction RM 7E,(02-27-14), 12.8 NOz-NO Conversion Efficiency Correction. If desired,calculate the total NOx concentration with a correction for converter efficiency using Equations 7E-8.(calc for non-bias corrected(raw)NOx gas,Run 1,if applicable) NOxc°„=NO+NOx—NO x100 Eq.7E-8 NOxcorr= ppm+ ppm- o ppm x 100= ppm E.fNoz /° Moisture Correction RM 7E,(02-27-14), 12.10 Moisture Correction. Use Equation 7E-10 if your measurements need to be corrected to a dry basis.(calc for analyzer, Run 1,if applicable) Note:Calculations may not match as Run 1 results are typically also bias adjusted CW=CD x(1—B�s) CW ppmvw CD_ 1-B , Eq.7E-10 CID= 1 = ppmv or inversely, CW= ppmvd x 1 - = ppmvw ns Diluent-Corrected Pollutant Concentration,Oz Based RM 20,(11-26-02),7.3.1 Correction of Pollutant Concentration Using OZ Concentration.Calculate the OZ corrected pollutant concentration,as follows: (calc for gas,Run 1,if applicable)[now contained in applicable Subpart] r Ca4 =Cc=(T•s ar)x 20.9%-C 20.9%—AdjFactor Eq.20 4 Cadj= ppm x 20.9%- I 20.9%- %d_ c�r(oz) Diluent-Corrected Pollutant Concentration,COz Based Calculate the COZ corrected pollutant concentration,as follows:(calc for gas,Run 1,if applicable) C C AdjFactor 1 r011. mi = C�(T��) x JI Cady= ppmxl J= CGo(co z) 011 Diluent-Corrected Pollutant Concentration,Oz Based with COz Measurements RM 20,(11-26-02),7.3.2 Correction of Pollutant Concentration to Percent OZ Using COZ Concentration.Calculate the OZ corrected pollutant concer3fratiQn,as follows:(calc for gas,Run 1,if applicable)[now contained in applicable Subpart] % _ Caaj=CC.(T arger)x C X. Eq.20-5 Cadi= ppm x oancoz) 7.2 COz Correction Factor.If pollutant concentrations are to be corrected to percent Oz and COz concentration is measured in lieu of Oz concentration measurement,a COz correction factor is needed.Calculate the COz correction factor as follows:7.2.1 Calculate the fuel specific Fo,as follows: 7.2.2. Calculate the COz correction factor for correcting measurement data to percent oxygen,as follows: Eq.20-2 Eq.20� F.0 - 0.2Fc F0_ 0.209 x SCF/MMBtu _ Xcoz _?0.9%—AdjFactor coz-X 20.9%- % /o _ - - - F. ° SCF/MMBtu ° - Diluent-Corrected Pollutant Concentration Corrected to ISO Conditions 40CFR60.335(b)(1),Conversion for conc.at ISO Conditions(68°F, 1 atm).Calculate,as follows:(calc for @%with Run 1 data,if applicable) X PO, )1.53 C'0 =C� x , x 288 P. T psig+14.69232 psi 0.01933677 psi/mm Hg. (19x( Ib/lb-0.00633)) 1.53 Clso= x psig+ psi x 2.718 x 288 K ppm@%and ISO 0.01933677 psi/mm Hg. ( K Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v20171120 App.A EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(RUNS) Emissions Rate(lb/hr) Calculation for pound per hour emission rate.Calculate,as follows:(calc for gas Run 1,if applicable) Ccas QS x MW _ ppm SCFH x Ib/lb-mol lb Erblbr — 106 x G Eibmr_ 106ppm/part x SCF/lb-mol hr Emissions Rate(ton/year) Calculation for tons per year emission rate based on 8760 hours per year.Calculate,as follows:(calc for gas Run 1,if applicable) E o° _ Erb/b, x hryea, Et°°Y = lb x hr x ton _ ton y, — 2000 hr year 2000lb year Emissions Rate(lb/MMBtu) RM 19,(07-19-06),12.2 Emission Rates of PM,S02,and NOx.Select from the following sections the applicable procedure to compute the PM,S02,or NOx emission rate(E)in ng/J(lb/million Btu).(calc for gas Run 1,if applicable) Oxygen Based 12.2.1 Oxygen-Based F Factor,Dry Basis.When measurements are on a dry basis for both 02 MCA and pollutant(Cd)concentrations,use the following equation: Ccas x FdFactor x Conv c x 20.9% ErblMMsa — a Eq.19-1 20.9%—C G (02) ppm x SCF/MMBtu x Ib/ppm*fe x 20.9% _ lb Elb/MMBtu— 20.9%- °/o MMBtu Carbon Dioxide Based 12.2.4 Carbon Dioxide-Based F Factor,Dry Basis.When measurements are on a dry basis for both CQ(%CO2d)and pollutant(Cd)concentrations, use the following equation: Ccas x Fd Factor x Conv c x 100 ErblMMsa — Eq.19-6 C,_(co 2) Elb/MMBtu ppm x SCF/MMBtu x Ib/ppm*fe x 100% lb - _ MMBtu Conversion Constant Convc for MW lb lb-mole lb Conv,(Ib/ppm•fts)_ G Conv,= lb-mole x SCF = ppm-fe 106 106 Sulfur Dioxide Rate(lb/MMBtu),40CFR60,App.A,RM 19,Eq.19-25(11/20/03) SO lb/MMBtu =0.97 x K x S(wt%) a o lb 2( ) 2x10 Wt/o GCV SO2=0.97 x Btu x _ wt%•MMBtu Btu/Ib MMBtu Emissions Rate(g/hp-hr) Calculation for grams per horsepower-hour.Calculate,as follows:(calc for gas Run 1,if applicable) E Em/n,x 453.6 or Elb/b,,x 453.6 gl by hr = mw x 1341.022 hp _ Ib 453.6 g 1 mw _ g E9/np-nr— hr x lb x mw x 1341.022 hp hp*hr lb 453.6 g 1 g Ey/np-hr hr x x lb hp hp*hr Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI 0.3 EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS(FTIR SPIKE) Concentration to dilute by 90%(ppmvw) AVG, - AVG, 2 AVGd= 2 pmvw _ ppmvw Ideal matrix spike yield(ppmvw) AVG,,x�Qm +AVG,.x Cl—Q' �sys 1�sys 1 Y;deai= ppmvw x[ Ipm J+ ppmvw x I 1 Ipm J= ppmvw Ipm Ipm Minimum matrix spike yield(ppmvw) Maximum matrix spike yield(ppmvw) Y_ —1 x 0.7 Y,;,x —l a x 1.3 Y;deai= ppmvw x 0.7= ppmvw Y;deai= ppmvw x 1.3= ppmvw Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 RM 7E,(08-15-06),12.1 Nomenclature. The terms used in the equations are defined as follows: ACE=Analyzer calibration error,percent of calibration span. Bws=Moisture content of sample gas as measured by Method 4 or other approved method,percent/100. CA 9=Average unadjusted gas concentration indicated by data recorder for the test run. Co=Pollutant concentration adjusted to dry conditions. Cp;,=Measured concentration of a calibration gas(low,mid,or high)when introduced in direct calibration mode. Co_=Average effluent gas concentration adjusted for bias. CM=Average of initial and final system calibration bias(or 2-point system calibration error)check responses for the upscale calibration gas. CMA=Actual concentration of the upscale calibration gas,ppmv. Co=Average of the initial and final system calibration bias(or 2-point system calibration error)check responses from the low-level(or zero)calibration gas. Cs=Measured concentration of a calibration gas(low,mid,or high)when introduced in system calibration mode. Css=Concentration of NOx measured in the spiked sample. Cs,Ike=Concentration of NOx in the undiluted spike gas. Cc,c=Calculated concentration of NOx in the spike gas diluted in the sample. Cv=Manufacturer certified concentration of a calibration gas(low,mid,or high). Cw=Pollutant concentration measured under moist sample conditions,wet basis. CS=Calibration span. D=Drift assessment,percent of calibration span. Ep=The predicted response for the low-level and mid-level gases based on a linear response line between the zero and high-level response. EffNO2=NOZ to NO converter efficiency,percent. H=High calibration gas,designator. L=Low calibration gas,designator. M=Mid calibration gas,designator. NOFinal=The average NO concentration observed with the analyzer in the NO mode during the converter efficiency test in Section 16.2.2. NOxCorr=The NOx concentration corrected for the converter efficiency. NOxFinal=The final NOx concentration observed during the converter efficiency test in Section 16.2.2. NOxPeak=The highest NOx concentration observed during the converter efficiency test in Section 16.2.2. QSpW=Flow rate of spike gas introduced in system calibration mode,L/min. Qrm,=Total sample flow rate during the spike test,L/min. R=Spike recovery,percent. SB=System bias,percent of calibration span. SB;=Pre-run system bias,percent of calibration span. SBf=Post-run system bias,percent of calibration span. SB/DAif=Alternative absolute difference criteria to pass bias and/or drift checks. SCE=System calibration error,percent of calibration span. SCE;=Pre-run system calibration error,percent of calibration span. SCEf,ai=Post-run system calibration error,percent of calibration span. Z=Zero calibration gas,designator. 40CFR60.355(b)(1),(09-20-06),Nomenclature. The terms used in the equations are defined as follows: P,=reference combustor inlet absolute pressure at 101.3 kilopascals ambient pressure,mm Hg Po=observed combustor inlet absolute pressure at test,mm Hg Ho=observed humidity of ambient air,g HZO/g air e=transcendental constant,2.718 Te=ambient temperature,K Small Engine and FTIR Nomenclature. The terms used in the equations are defined as follows: bhp=brake horsepower hp=horsepower Q,=system flow(Ipm) Qm=matrix spike flow(Ipm) Comp&RATA&Eng-AHIv1.3 RM 19,(07-29-06),12.1 Nomenclature. The terms used in the equations are defined as follows: Adfactor=percent oxygen or carbon dioxide adjustment applied to a target polltant B_=Moisture fraction of ambient air,percent. Btu=British thermal unit %0=Concentration of carbon from an ultimate analysis of fuel,weight percent. %coed,%co2w=Concentration of carbon dioxide on a dry and wet basis,respectively,percent. CIP/CDP=Combustor inlet pressure/compressor discharge pressure(mm Hg);note,some manufactures reference as PCD. E=Pollutant emission rate,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Ea=Average pollutant rate for the specified performance test period,ng/J(lb/million Btu). E_E,i=Average pollutant rate of the control device,outlet and inlet,respectively,for the performance test period,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Eb;=Pollutant rate from the steam generating unit,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Ebo=Pollutant emission rate from the steam generating unit,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Ec;=Pollutant rate in combined effluent,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Er =Pollutant emission rate in combined effluent,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Ed=Average pollutant rate for each sampling period(e.g.,24-hr Method 6B sample or 24-hr fuel sample)or for each fuel lot(e.g.,amount of fuel bunkered),ng/J(lb/million Btu). Ed;=Average inlet S02 rate for each sampling period d,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Eg=Pollutant rate from gas turbine,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Eg8=Daily geometric average pollutant rate,ng/J(lbs/million Btu)or ppm corrected to 7 percent 0 2. Eio,Ep=Matched pair hourly arithmetic average pollutant rate,outlet and inlet,respectively,ng/J(lb/million Btu)or ppm corrected to 7 percent O 2. Eh=Hourly average pollutant,ng/J(lb/million Btu). Ehi=Hourly arithmetic average pollutant rate for hour"j,"ng/J(lb/million Btu)or ppm corrected to 7 percent 0 2. EXP=Natural logarithmic base(2.718)raised to the value enclosed by brackets. Fc=Ratio of the volume of carbon dioxide produced to the gross calorific value of the fuel from Method 19 Fd,Fw,F,=Volumes of combustion components per unit of heat content,scm/J(scf/million Btu). ft3=cubic feet G=ideal gas conversion factor (385.23 SCF/lb-mol at 68 deg F&14.696 psia) GCM=gross Btu per SCF(constant,compound based) GCV=Gross calorific value of the fuel consistent with the ultimate analysis,kJ/kg(Btu/Ib). GCVP,GCVr=Gross calorific value for the product and raw fuel lots,respectively,dry basis,kJ/kg(Btu/Ib). %H=Concentration of hydrogen from an ultimate analysis of fuel,weight percent. Hb=Heat input rate to the steam generating unit from fuels fired in the steam generating unit,J/hr(million Btu/hr). H9=Heat input rate to gas turbine from all fuels fired in the gas turbine,J/hr(million Btu/hr). %H2o=Concentration of water from an ultimate analysis of fuel,weight percent. Hr=Total numbers of hours in the performance test period(e.g.,720 hours for 30-day performance test period). K=volume of combustion component per pound of component(constant) K=Conversion factor,10-5(kJ/J)/(%)[106 Btu/million Btu]. K,_(9.57 scm/kg)/%[(1.53 scf/lb)/%]. Ka=(2.0 scm/kg)/%[(0.321 scf/lb)/%]. Khd=(22.7 scm/kg)/%[(3.64 scf/lb)/%]. Khw=(34.74 scm/kg)/%[(5.57 scf/lb)/%]. K =(0.86 scm/kg)/%[(0.14 scf/lb)/%]. Ko=(2.85 scm/kg)/%[(0.46 scf/lb)/%]. KS=(3.54 scm/kg)/%[(0.57 scf/lb)/%]. K I r=2x10°Btu/wt%-MMBtu Kw=(1.30 scm/kg)/%[(0.21 scf/lb)/%]. lb=pound In=Natural log of indicated value. Lp,Lr=Weight of the product and raw fuel lots,respectively,metric ton(ton). %N=Concentration of nitrogen from an ultimate analysis of fuel,weight percent. M.�=mole percent mol=mole MW=molecular weight(lb/lb-mol) MWAiR=molecular weight of air( 28.9625 Ib/lb-mole)' NCM=net Btu per SCF(constant based on compound) %o=Concentration of oxygen from an ultimate analysis of fuel,weight percent. %02d,%02w=Concentration of oxygen on a dry and wet basis,respectively,percent. Ps=barometirc pressure,in Hg Ps=Potential S02 emissions,percent. %s=Sulfur content of as-fired fuel lot,dry basis,weight percent. S.=Standard deviation of the hourly average pollutant rates for each performance test period,ng/J(lb/million Btu). %Sf=Concentration of sulfur from an ultimate analysis of fuel,weight percent. S(wt%) =weight percent of sulfur,per lab analysis by appropriate ASTM standard Si=Standard deviation of the hourly average inlet pollutant rates for each performance test period,ng/J(lb/million Btu). So=Standard deviation of the hourly average emission rates for each performance test period,ng/J(lb/million Btu). %Sp,%Sr=Sulfur content of the product and raw fuel lots respectively,dry basis,weight percent. SCF=standard cubic feet SH=specific humidity,pounds of water per pound of air to,=Values shown in Table 19-3 for the indicated number of data points n. T_b=ambient temperature,°F W/D Factor= 1.0236 =conv.at 14.696 psia and 68 deg F(ref.Civil Eng.Ref.Manual,7th Ed.) X0o2=CO2 Correction factor,percent. Xk=Fraction of total heat input from each type of fuel k. Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI v1.3 Calculations, Formulas, and Constants The following information supports the spreadsheets for this testing project. Given Data: Ideal Gas Conversion Factor=385.23 SCF/lb-mol at 68 deg F&14.696 psia Fuel Heating Value is based upon Air Hygiene's fuel gas calculation sheet. All calculations are based upon a correction to 68 deg F&14.696 psia High Heating Values(HHV)are used for the Fuel Heating Value,F-Factor,and Fuel Flow Data per EPA requirements. ASTM D 3588 40CFR60,App.A.,RM 19,Table 19-1 Molecular Weight of NOx(lb/lb-mole)= 46.01 Conversion Constant for NOx= 0. Molecular Weight of CO(lb/lb-mole)= 28.00 Conversion Constant for CO= 0. Molecular Weight of S02(lb/lb-mole)= 64.00 Conversion Constant for S02= 0. Molecular Weight of THC(propane)(lb/lb-mole)= 44.00 Conversion Constant for THC= 0. Molecular Weight of VOC(methane)(lb/lb-mole)= 16.00 Conversion Constant for VOC(methane)= 0. Molecular Weight of NH3(lb/lb-mole)= 17.03 Conversion Constant for NH3=0. Molecular Weight of HCHO(lb/lb-mole)= 30.03 Conversion Constant for HCHO= 0. NOTE:units are Ib/ppm*ft3 Formulas: 1.Corrected Raw Average(Cc85),40CFR60,App.A,RM 7E,Eq.7E-5(08/15/06) CGo _ (CAvg -CO)x C" 4.Emission Concentration in Ib/MMBtu(02 based) Ccm -co _ C x F Factor x Conv x 20.9% _ cns a c Elb/MMBta 20.9% 2.Correction to%02,40CFR60,App.A,RM 20,Eq.20-5(11/26/02) -CGas(02) Cadj = Ccas(Target) x 20.9%-AdjFactor 0 5.Emission Concentration in Ib/MMBtu(CO2 based) 20.9%-CG-(O2) _ CGas x Fa Factor x Conv c x 100 F'lblMMBtu - 3.Emission Rate in Ib/hr CGas(CO2) E - Ccas xQsxMW 16/hr 106 G RATA SHEET CALCULATIONS d=Reference Method Data-CEMS Data Sd=Standard Deviation In t In t In t CC=Confident Coefficient 2 12.706 7 2.447 12 2.201 n=number of runs 3 4.303 8 2.365 13 2.179 to.025=2.5 percent confidence coefficent T-values 4 3.182 9 2.306 14 2.160 RA=relative accuracy 5 2.776 10 2.262 15 2.145 ARA=alternative relative accuracy 6 2.571 11 2.228 16 2.131 BAF=Bias adjustment factor 1.Difference n d = y d t 4. Relative Accuracy -t I dAVG I+ICCI RA = x 100 2. Standard Deviation RM AVG n 2 di 5. Alternative Relative Accuracy Ed2 _ l=t ARA = IdAVG I+ICCI x 100 =t=1i n AS Sd = 5. Bias Adjustment Factor n-1 r BAF =1+I IdAVGI 3. Confident Coefficient l CEM Avc CC = to.025 x Sd Comp&RATA&Eng-AHI 0.3 METHOD 5(FRONT)AND 202 (BACK) SOURCE SAMPLING TITLE PAGE Source Information Plant Name Sampling Location Fuel Type Test Information Project# Operator Date for Preliminary Run (mm/dd/yy) Standard Temperature 68 °F Standard Pressure 29.92 in Hg Required Sample Vol. indust.spec. 100 scf Run Duration >2 min/point 180 minutes Unit Number Base Run Number Number of Ports Available Number of Ports Used Port Inside Diameter in Stack Shape Circular Test Equipment Information Run 1 2 3 4 5 6 Test Date (mm/dd/yy) Load %or w/DB Fuel F-Factor dscf/MMBtu Meter Box Number from ACS Meter Calibration Factor (Y) Orifice Meter Coefficient (AH@) in HZO Non-Console Manometer Used Pitot Identification from ACS Pitot Tube Coefficient (CI) Nozzle Number from ACS Nozzle Diameter (Dn) in Probe Number from ACS Probe Length in (SS, Glass .... ) Liner Material from list Sample Case/Oven Number from ACS Impinger Case Number from ACS Testing Company Information Company Name Air Hygiene International, Inc. (Tulsa, Oklahoma) Address 1600 W Tacoma Street City, State Zip Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 Project Manager Phone Number (918)307-8865 Fax Number (918)307-9131 Created with Isocalc-AHI v20170105 Isocalc-AHI v20170202 Title Page METHOD 1-SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR CIRCULAR SOURCES Plant Name Date Sampling Location Stack Type Circular Operator Ports Available Project# Ports Used Stack Size Small(<24 inch diameter) Port ID(inches) Circular Stack or Duct Diameter L,, Distance to Far Wall of Stack (Lrw) in L_ Distance to Near Wall of Stack (L_) in Diameter of Stack (D) in Area of Stack (As) ft� D Distance from Port to Disturbances Distance Upstream (A) in Diameters Upstream (Au) diameters Distance Downstream (B) in Diameters Downstream (Bp) diameters A Number of Traverse Points Required T Diameters to Minimum Number of ? Flow Disturbance Traverse Points B Down Up Particulate Velocity Stream Stream Points Points 2.00-4.99 0.50-1.24 24 16 5.00-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 16 6.00-6.99 1.50-1.74 16 12 7.00-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12 >=8.00 1 >=2.00 8 or 122 8 or 122 Upstream Spec Number of Traverse Points Used Downstream Spec • Method 1 Trav Ports by Across Traverse Pts Required Pts Used Required 12 Point PM Tray 'Check Minimum Number of Points for the Upstream (M201a ONLY) and Downstream conditions,then use the largest. Velocity 2 8 for Circular Stacks 12 to 24 inches Traverse Point Locations 12 for Circular Stacks over 24 inches Fraction Distance Distance Locdw of Tramp Points In Circular Stacks Traverse of from Including Traverse vracwIStKk0—mifimmo-oft WataTra Poo Point Stack Inside Reference Point Nwnber of Tramp Poll*Acrop Me Stack Number Diameter Wall Length Number n n 082 067 057 .049 044 1 3 099 085 075 2 4 .146 125 109 3 5 169 146 6 220 188 4 7 236 5 8 296 9 918 823 731 0 M2 6 10 7 11 12 979 901 831 .764 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Isocalc-AHI v20170202 M1-Circular METHOD 1-SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES FOR RECTANGULAR SOURCES Plant Name Date Sampling Location Stack Type Operator Ports Available Project# Ports Used Stack Size Port ID(inches) Rectangular Stacks or Ducts Ltw Length to Far Wall of Stack (Lt,,) in L w Length to Near Wall of Stack (L w) in Length of Stack (L) in Width of Stack (W) in Equivalent Stack Diam (Dj in W Area of Stack (As) ft� Distance from Port to Disturbances Distance Upstream (A) in Diameters Upstream (AD) diameters Distance Downstream (B) n A Diameters Downstream (Bp) diameters T Number of Traverse Points Required TB Diameters to Minimum Number of Flow Disturbance Traverse Points Down Up Particulate Velocity Stream Stream Points Points 2.00-4.99 0.50-1.24 25 16 5.00-5.99 1.25-1.49 20 16 6.00-6.99 1.50-1.74 16 12 7.00-7.99 1.75-1.99 12 12 Number of Traverse Points Used >=8.00 1 -2.00 9 or 122 9 or 122 Ports by I Across Upstream Spec I Pts Used I lRequired Downstream Spec • Method 1 Trav Traverse Pts Required T 12 Point PM Tray 'Check Minimum Number of Points for the Upstream (M201a ONLY) Traverse Point Locations and Downstream conditions,then use the largest. Velocity Fraction Distance Distance 2 9 for Rectangular Stacks 12 to 24 inches Traverse of from Including 12 for All Stacks over 24 inches Point Stack Inside Reference LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN RECTANGULAR STACKS Number Dimension Wall Length Traverse Percent of Stack Diameter from Inside Wall to Traverse Point in in Point Number of Traverse Pants on a Diameter Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 0.500 0.250 0.167 0,125 0A00 0.083 0,071 0.063 0,056 2 2 0,750 0.500 0.375 0.300 0.250 0.214 0.188 0,167 3 3 0.833 0.625 0.5W 0.417 0.357 0.313 0.278 4 4 0.875 0.700 0.583 0.500 0,438 0,389 5 5 0.900 0.750 0.643 0.563 0.500 6 0.917 0.786 0.688 0.611 6 7 0.929 0.813 0.722 7 8 0,938 0.833 8 9 1 10.944 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Isocalc-AHI v20170202 M1-Rectangular METHOD 2-DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE Plant Name Date Sampling Location Stack Type Circular Operator Ports Available Project# Pitot Identification Pitot Leak Check PreTest PostTest Pitot Coefficient Stack Dimensions Velocity Traverse Data Area of Stack I (AS) ft2 Run Number V1 Diameter of Stack (D) I I in Run Time Start End Traverse Velocity Null Zero Deg Stack Local Point Head Angle Pressure Temp Velocity Pressures (Op) (Na) (o°a) (ts) No) Barometric Pressure (Pb) in Hg in H2O deg in H2O °F ft/sec Static Pressure (Pstano) in H2O Absolute Stack Pressure (PS) in Hg Alarms Exist-Enter Static Pressure(see below)!!! Stack Gas Composition Composition Data: Estimated Composition Carbon Dioxide Concentration (%CO2) %vd Oxygen Concentration (%02) %vd Carbon Monoxide Concentration (ppmCO) ppmvd Nitrogen Concentration (%N2) %vd Stack Moisture Content (BWS) % Stack Dry Molecular Weight NJ lb/lb-mole Stack Wet Molecular Weight ft) lb/lb-mole Results Avg Stack Gas Velocity NO ft/sec Avg Stack Dry Std Flow Rate Ad) dscf/hr Avg Stack Dry Std Flow Rate Ad) dscf/min Avg Stack Wet Flow Rate A.) acf/min Avg Stack Wet Std Flow Rate (Q_) ascf/hr 40 CFR 60,Method 2G,Section 8.11.1(but applies to all Method 2 type static pressure measurements): If a Type S probe is used for this measurement,position the probe at or between any traverse point(s)and rotate the probe until a null differential pressure reading is obtained.Disconnect the tubing from one of the pressure ports;read and record the AP.For pressure devices with one-directional scales,if a deflection in the positive direction is noted with the negative side disconnected,then the static pressure is positive.Likewise,if a deflection in the positive direction is noted with the positive side disconnected,then the static pressure is negative. Stack Cross Section Schematic Average =Square roots of Ap Standard deviation of null angles= Isocalc-AHI v20170202 M2-Run(1) METHOD 3a-DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT BY ANALYZER Plant Name Preliminary Date Sampling Location Operator Project# #of Ports Used 1 (gas probe) Fuel Type Min. Fuel Factor Max. Fuel Factor j] Gas Analysis Data Run Number Date Run Start Time Run Stop Time Sample co, OZ CO NZ Dry Molecular Calculated Excess Fuel Analysis Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Weight Fuel Factor Air Factor in Time (%CO,) (%Oz) (ppmCO) (%NZ) (Md) (FO)avg (%EA)avg Range hh:mm % % ppm % lb/lb-mole % Gas Analysis Data Run Number Date Run Start.Time Run Stop Time Sample co, OZ CO NZ Dry Molecular Calculated Excess Fuel Analysis Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Weight Fuel Factor Air Factor in Time (%COz) (%Oz) (ppmCO) (%N2) (Md) (FO)avg (%EA)avg Range hh:mm % % ppm % lb/lb-mole % Gas Analysis Data Run Number Date Run Start Time Run Stop Time Sample co, OZ CO NZ Dry Molecular Calculated Excess Fuel Analysis Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Weight Fuel Factor Air Factor in Time (%COA (%Oz) (ppmCO) (%N2) (Md) (Fo)avg (%EA)avg Range hh:mm % % ppm % lb/lb-mole % Gas Analysis Data Run Number Date Run Start Time Run Stop Time Sample co, OZ CO NZ Dry Molecular Calculated Excess Fuel Analysis Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Weight Fuel Factor Air Factor in Time (%COA (%Oz) (ppmCO) (%N2) (Md) (Fo)avg (%EA)avg Range hh:mm % % ppm % lb/lb-mole % Gas Analysis Data Run Number Date Run Start Time Run Stop Time Sample co, OZ CO NZ Dry Molecular Calculated Excess Fuel Analysis Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Weight Fuel Factor Air Factor in Time (%COA (%Oz) (ppmCO) (%N2) (Md) (FO)avg (%EA)avg Range hh:mm % % ppm % lb/lb-mole % Gas Analysis Data Run Number Date Run Start Time Run Stop Time Sample co, OZ CO NZ Dry Molecular Calculated Excess Fuel Analysis Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Weight Fuel Factor Air Factor in Time (%COA (%Oz) (ppmCO) (%N2) (Md) (FO)avg (%EA)avg Range hh:mm % % ppm % lb/lb-mole % Isocalc-AHI v20170202 M3a-Mol Wt METHOD 4-DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES Plant Name Preliminary Date Sampling Location Operator Project# Ports Used Scale Daily Calibration Scale Number Standard Result Difference Pass/Fail Date (g) (g) (g) (+0.5 g) Preliminary Date 500 Test Day 1 500 Test Day 2 500 Test Day 3 500 Test Day 4 500 Test Day 51 500 Moisture Content Data Run Number Date Start Time Stop Time Meter Box Number Meter Cal Factor (Y) Total Meter Volume (Vm) dcf Barometric Pressure TO in Hg Average Stack Temp (Wav9 °F Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) in HZO Average Meter Temp (tm)av9 -F Avg Orifice Pressure (AH)av9 in HZO Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 Impinger 5 Impinger 6 Impinger 7 Impinger 8 (g) (g) (g) (g) Contents Dry Dry DI Water Sil Gel Final Value (Vf),(Wf) Initial Value (V;),(W;) Net Value (V),(W) Results Total Weight (WO g Water Vol Weighed (V—,(Std)) scf Std Meter Volume (Vm(std)) dscf Sat.Moisture Content (Bws(svp)) % Calc Moisture Content (Bws(caic)) % Final Moisture Content (Bws) % Moisture Content Data Run Number Date I Start Time Stop Time Meter Box Number Meter Cal Factor (Y) Total Meter Volume (Vm) dcf Barometric Pressure TO in Hg Average Stack Temp (to., -F Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) in HZO Average Meter Temp (tm)av9 -F Avg Orifice Pressure (AH)av9 in HZO Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 Impinger 5 Impinger 6 Impinger 7 Impinger 8 (g) (g) (g) (g) Contents Dry Dry DI Water Sil Gel Final Value (Vf),(Wf) Initial Value (V;),(W;) Net Value (V ),(W ) Results Total Weight (Wt) g Water Vol Weighed (V—&td)) scf Std Meter Volume (Vm(std)) dscf Sat.Moisture Content (Bws(svp)) % Calc Moisture Content (B_(_jc)) % Final Moisture Content (Bws) % Moisture Content Data Run Number Date I Start Time Stop Time Meter Box Number Meter Cal Factor (Y) Total Meter Volume (Vm) dcf Barometric Pressure TO in Hg Average Stack Temp (ts)av9 -F Stack Static Pressure (Pstatic) in HZO Average Meter Temp (tm)av9 -F Avg Orifice Pressure (AH)a 9 in HZO Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 Impinger 5 Impinger 6 Impinger 7 Impinger 8 (g) (g) (g) (g) Contentsi Dry Dry I DI Water I Sil Gel Final Value (Vf),(Wf) Isocalc-AHI v20170202 M4-Moisture METHOD 5(FRONT)AND 202(BACK)SOURCE SAMPLING TITLE PAGE ISOKINETIC SAMPLING DATA Plant Name Date Ideal Nozzle Diameter and IsoKinetic Factor Setup Sampling Location Operator Pitot Coefficient (Cp) Project# Run Number 1 Average Stack Temp N) °F Average Meter Temp (t,n) 85.0 Leak Checks Sampling Equipment Orifice Meter Coefficient (AH@) in H2O Train Pre fN/min@ in Hg Meter Box Number Square Root AP (Ap" ) in H2O Post fN/min@ in Hg Meter Cal Factor (Y) Stack Moisture Content (B_) Pilot Pre(+) in H2O for sec Nozzle Number Stack Dry Molecular Weight (Md) lb/lb-mole Pre(-) in H2O for sec Average Nozzle Diameter (De,) in Estimated Orifice Flow Rate (Qm) 0.75 acfm Post(+) in H2O for sec Suggested Nozzle Diameter (D„i) in AP to AH IsoKinetic Factor (K) Post(-) in H2O for sec Probe Number in Probe Length in Pressures Nozzle Measurements Barometer ID Liner Material Barometric Pressure (Pb) in Hg Pre PASS Sample Case/Oven Number Stack Static Pressure (Pa ) in H2O Postj I I I PASS Scale ID Impinger Case Numberl Absolute Stack Pressure (Ps) in Hg Absolute Meter Pressure (Pm) in Hg Run Time Weights Imp 1 Imp 2 Imp 3 Imp 4 Imp 5 Imp 6 Imp 7 Imp 8 Startl I Endl Pre I Wash I I I Iml Alarms Exist-Enter Run Times!!! PO3t Volumes I I I I Imi Dry Gas Desired Actual Impinger CPM Meter Meter Square Local Cumul. Cumul. Est-Run Traverse Sampling Timer Meter Velocity Orifice Orifice Stack Probe Filter Exit Cond. Filter Inlet Outlet Pump Root Stack Meter Percent Meter Point# Time Time Reading Head AH AH Temp Temp Temp Temp Temp Temp Temp Temp Vacuum AP Velocity Volume IsoKinetic Volume (0) (Vm) (AP) (AHd) (AH.) (t,) (248±25°F)(248±25°F) (568-F) (585-F) (76.5±8.5°F) (tml) (t,,,p) (Aptn) (vJ1 (Vm),w (I) (Vm)ew min hh:mm:ss fN in H2O in H2O in H2O °F °F °F °F °F °F °F °F in Hg J(in H2O) ftlsec dscf % dscf 0.0 00:00:00 Final Val 0.0 00,0000 Max Vac Final Values Average Values PS 11,Port Changes Port A-B Port B-C Port C-D Port D-E Port E-F Port F-G Port G-H Out In Isocalc-AHI v20170202 Isocalc-Run(1) SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY DATA SHEET Plant Name Date Sampling Location Operator Project# Run History Data Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 Run Start Time (hh:mm) Run Stop Time (hh:mm) Train Prepared By Train Recovered By Recovery Date (mm/dd/yy) Relinquished By Received By Relinquished Date (mm/dd/yy) Relinquished Time (hh:mm) Equipment Identification Numbers Impinger Case Sample Blank Taken NO Sample Box PM Filter Alarms Exist-Collect Sample Blanks and complete Chain of CPM Filter Custod y...M Moisture Content Data Impingers 1,2,and 3-Liquid Weight Final Weight A) g Initial Weight (W) g Net Weight (WI) g Comments Impinger 4-Silica Gel Weight Final Weight A) g Initial Weight (W) g Net Weight (Wn) g Comments Total Water Collected Total Weight (Wig) I g Total Volume (VIC) I mI Isocalc-AHI v20170202 Recovery SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA SHEET Plant Name Date Sampling Location Operator Project# Analytical Data Run 1 Start Time Sample Leakage Evident YES Estimated Leak Volume (mg) Sample Type Sample Number Date Time Filter Probe Wash Inorganic Impinger Contents Organic Impinger Contents Weight Data Run 1 Start Time Filter and Beaker Weight Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) N °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 Probe Wash and Beaker Weight Date 1 Time Humidityl Temp Calibration Audit Weight (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) N °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 Inorganic Impinger Contents Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit and Beaker Weight (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) N °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 Organic Impinger Contents Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit and Beaker Weight (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) N °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 --and Beaker Weight Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) N °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 --and Beaker Weight Weight Date I Time Humidityl Temp Calibration Audit (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) (%) °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 --and Beaker Weight Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) (%) °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 and Beaker Weight Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit -- (g) (mm/ddtyy) (hh:mm) (%) °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 Blank and Titration Concentrations Blank Type Weight Volume Concentration Mass (g) (ml) (mg/ml) (mg) Acetone Blank Weight of Solids — DI Water Blank Weight of Solids — Hexane Blank Weight of Solids - -Blank Weight of Solids 0AN NH,OH Correction — -- Gravimetric Concentrations Run 1 Start Time Sample Portion Final Tare Gain Volume Blank Adjustment Adjusted Gain (g) (9) (m9) (mI) (m9) (mg) Filter -- -- Filter Beaker -- -- Probe Wash Inorganic Impinger Contents Organic Impinger Contents Isocalc-AHI v20170202 Analytical-Run(1) SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA SHEET Plant Name Date Sampling Location Operator Project# Analytical Data Run FB Start Time Sample Leakage Evident NO Estimated Leak Volume 0.00 (mg) Sample Type Sample Number Date Time Inorganic Impinger Contents Organic Impinger Contents Weight Data Run FB Start Time Inorganic Impinger Contents Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit and Beaker Weight (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) N °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 Organic Impinger Contents Weight Date Time Humidity Temp Calibration Audit and Beaker Weight (g) (mm/dd/yy) (hh:mm) N °F (g) Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 Measurement 4 Gravimetric Concentrations Actual Final Tare Gain Gain Sample Portion (g) (g) (mg) (mg) Inorganic Impinger Contents Organic Impinger Contents Isocalc-AHI v20170202 Analytical - FB METHOD 5 (FRONT)AND 202 (BACK)- RESULTS Plant Name Sampling Location Project# Historical Data Average Units Limits Run Start Time hh:mm Run Stop Time hh:mm Test Date mm/dd/yy Meter Calibration Factor Pitot Tube Coefficient Average Nozzle Diameter in Stack Test Data Average Units Limits Initial Meter Volume ft3 Final Meter Volume ft3 Total Meter Volume ft3 Total Sampling Time min Average Meter Temperature °F Average Stack Temperature °F Barometric Pressure in Hg Stack Static Pressure in H2O Absolute Stack Pressure in Hg Average Orifice Pressure Drop in H2O Absolute Meter Pressure in Hg Avg Square Root Pitot Pressure �(in H2O) Moisture Content Data Average Units Limits Impinger Water Weight Gain g Silica Gel Weight Gain g Total Water Volume Collected ml Standard Water Vapor Volume scf Standard Meter Volume dscf Standard Metric Meter Volume dscm Calculated Stack Moisture % Saturated Stack Moisture % Reported Stack Moisture Content % Gas Analysis Data Average Units Limits Carbon Dioxide Content % Oxygen Content % Carbon Monoxide Content ppm Nitrogen Content % Stack Dry Molecular Weight lb/lb-mole Stack Wet Molecular Weight lb/lb-mole Calculated Fuel Factor Fuel F-Factor dscf/MMBtu Percent Excess Air % Volumetric Flow Rate Data Average Units Limits Isocalc-AHI v20170202 Results METHOD 5 (FRONT)AND 202 (BACK)- RESULTS Plant Name Sampling Location Project# Average Stack Gas Velocity ft/sec Stack Cross-Sectional Area ft2 Actual Stack Flow Rate acfm Wet Standard Stack Flow Rate wkscfh Dry Standard Stack Flow Rate dscfh Percent of Isokinetic Rate % Gravimetric Analysis Average Units Limits NH4OH Correction ml NH4OH Correction mg Emission Rate Data Average Units Limits Total PM/PM10 Mass mg -- Total PM/PMlo Concentration g/dscf -- gr/dscf -- kg/hr -- Ib/hr -- Total PM/PM10 Emission Rate tpy -- Ib/MMBtu -- Isocalc-AHI v20170202 Results EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS (Reference Method 1 - Circular Stack) Diameter of Stack(in.) Area of Stack(ft) D(in.)=Lf„ —Lnw A,(ft 2)=)Tx D 2 (2x 12) D (in.)= in. - in. = in. 2 AS (ft) = 3.14 x( in. )2= ft2 Stack Diameters Downstream 2 x 12in./ft B BD(dia.) = — D Stack Diameters Upstream Bp (dia.) _ in. = diameters AD(dia.)- A in. D AD (dia.) _ in. = diameters in. EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS (Reference Method 1 - Rectangular Stack) Length of Stack(in.) Equivalent Diameter of Stack(in.) L(in.) = L fiv —Lnw De(in.) = 2 x L x W L + W L (in.)= in. - in. = in. De (in )_ 2 x in. x in. = in. in. + in. Area of Stack(ft) AS(ft 2) = w x l Stack Diameters Downstream B BD(dia.)=— AS(ft) = ft x ft = ft 2 D, 12 12 Bp (dia.) _ in. = diameters in. Stack Diameters Upstream AD(dia.) = A AD (dia.) _ in. = diameters in. Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Calculations EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS (Reference Method 3a) [Values from Run 1 test] Carbon Monoxide Concentration (%) %CO = ppmCO 10,000 %CO (%) = PPm = % 10,000 ppm/% Nitrogen Concentration (%) %N2 =100—%CO2 —%02 —%CO %N2 (%)= 100- %- %- / 10,000 % _ % Stack Dry Molecular Weight(lb/lb-mole) Md(lb/lb— mol)_ MW Co.p x %component Md (lb/lb-mol) _ ( 44 Ib/Ib-mol 100 x % )+ 100 32 Ib/lb-mol 28 Ib/lb-mol lb ( x %) +100 ( 100 x +10,000 � ) lb-mol Stack Wet Molecular Weight(lb/lb-mole) M (lb/lb— mol)=[Md x 1— BWS 1+ MW x BWS J s ( 100 ) [ H20 100IJ J MS (lb/lb-mol)_{ lb x 0 - % ))+{ }+{ 18 lb x % }_ lb lb-mol 100 lb-mol 100 lb-mol Average Calculated Fuel Factor(F°) L20.9—(%02)avg —(0.5 x(%CO),,,)� F°(a g� (%CO2),,, +(%CO),,g 20.9% - % -(0.5 x %) Fo(avg)_ _ Average Excess Air(%) °roEAQvg N 100 x L(%02)ag v —(0.5 x(%CO),, )� = 0.264 x(N2)avg — (%02)avg — 0.5 x(%CO),g 100 x{ %- (0.5x % )} (0.264 x %)-{ % - (0.5 x %)} Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Calculations EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS (Reference Method 2) [Values from Run 1 test] Absolute Stack Pressure (in. Hg) Ps(in.Hg)=Pb + Pstatic 13.6 PS(in. Hg)= in. Hg + in. H20 = in. Hg 13.6 in. H2O/in. Hg Average Stack Gas Velocity(ft/sec) is avg +Ta vs(ftl sec) = KpxCpx ( Op)avgx PSxMs vs, (ft/sec)_ ( 85.49 ft (lb/lb-mol)(in. Hg) )1v2 x 0.84 x in.H20112 x +460 OR _ ft sec (°R)(in. H2O) in. Hg x Ib/lb-mol sec Average Stack Dry Standard Flow Rate (dscfh) 60x60x 1—B001xvsxA,XTOXPS Qsd(ClfSCZ)_ (ts+T.)x Pstd 3600 sec % ft Qsa (dscf/hr) = hr x(1 100 )x sec x ft2 x 68.00 +460 OR in. Hg dscf x = +460 OR 29.92 in. Hg hr Average Stack Wet Flow Rate (acfm) QaW(acfm)=60 x vs x AS QaW 60 sec ft(acf/min) = x x ft2 acf = min sec min Average Stack Wet Standard Flow Rate (ascfh) QsW(ascfh)= 60 x QaW x Ts:d x Ps (ts +T.)x Pstd 60 min acf Qs ,(ascf/hr)= x x hr min 68.00 +460 OR in. Hg ascf x = +460 OR 29.92 in. Hg hr Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Calculations EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS (Reference Method 4) [Values from Run 1 test] Water Volume Weighed (scf) Vwsg(std)(scf = Wt x K5 Vwsg(std)— g x 0.04715 ft3/g = scf Standard Meter Volume (dscf) K1xYxvx Pb + A.Havg 13.6 Vm(std) dscf)_ \tm/avg +T 17.65 OR in. H2O x x dcf x( in. Hg + ) Vm(std)= in. Hg 13.6 in. H2O/in. Hg = dscf OF + 460 OR Calculated Moisture Content(%) Bws(carc) =100 x Vwsg(std) Vwsg(std) +Vm(std) dscf _ Bws(ca,c)= 100 x dscf+ dscf % Saturated Moisture Content(%) 6.691— 3144 ts(a�a)+390.86 Bws(svp)(°/a)=100 x 10 <_ 100 Pb + Pstatic 13.6 (6.691 - 3144 ) °F+390.86 Bws(s,ip)= 100 x 10 <_ 100 = % in. Hg + in. H2O 13.6 in. H2O/in. Hg Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Calculations EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS (Isokinetic Sampling) [Values from Run 1 test] Desired Orifice (in. H2O) (first point) Absolute Meter Pressure (in. Hg) AH@ AHd(in.H2O)=K x Ap 13.6 AHd (in. H2O) = x in. H2O in. H2O = in. H2O Pm (in. Hg)= in. Hg + 13.6 in. H2O/in. Hg in. Hg Recommended Nozzle Diameter(in.) B�. r _ Bws Bws CnxQmxPm 1- 100 T MdXl1 100 )+(18X D,(in.) X X (ts + 1 u)X 100 ) = (tm + Tu)XCp 1— Bws PsXApavg 100 J 0.03575 (lb-mole•°R•in. H20)'/2•m in-in.2 0.00 % �ni (In.) 3/4 t/2 x 0.75 acf x in. Hg 1 - acf•in. Hg -lb"2(_ OF +460°R,x 0.84 x( % )x 1 - 100 lb % 18 lb % X( 1 - )+( x ) lb-mole 100 lb-mol 100 ( F 460 R x in. Hg x in. H2O = in. 2 AP to AH Isokinetic Factor M x 1- B. + 18X B. _ Bws K= CkxCpxAH@xDax d �0 0 X 1 0 X tm +Tu X Ps M x 1— ws + 18 x B. 1— wm is+Ta Pm d 100 100 100 1 - 849.8 100 of +460°R K= x 0.84 2x in. H2O x 4x( )2x )x in. H20•in.4 1 0.00 % OF +460°R - 100 lb 0.00 % 18 lb 0.00 % X( 1 - )+( x ) lb/mole 100 lb-mol 100 in. Hg ( x = lb % 18 lb % in. Hg lb/mole X( 1 100 )+( lb-mol x 100 ) Cumulative Percent Isokinetic (%) (first point) I(%) - K4 x ((ts)avg + T)x Vm(std) , )z O x (vs�/>)av X P x x 2 Dna x 12 x Cl— 100g 0.0945 min-in. Hg I (%)= x( OF +460°R)x dscf sec-OR ° — % min x ft x in. Hg x 3.14 x( �n /o ft.x )2x( 1 ) - sec 2 12 in. 100 Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Calculations EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS (Gravimetric Analysis) [Values from Run 1 test] Blank Concentration [Acetone Blank Weight of Solids] (mg/ml) Cx(mg/ml) — 1000 x Wx vx CX(mg/ml)= 1000 mg x g _ mg g ml ml Blank Adjustment[Acetone Blank Weight of Solids and Nozzle Wash PM>10]] (mg) Wx(mg) — vxXCx Wx(mg)= ml x mg/ml = mg < Sample Gain Sample Gain [Nozzle Wash PM>10] (mg) Mx(mg) _ (m fx —m tx)X 1000 1000 mg mX(mg)= x( 9 - g ) = mg 9 Adjusted Sample Gain [Nozzle Wash PM>10] (mg) m xadf (mg) = Mx — Wx mxadj (mg) = mg - mg = mg 0.1 N NH4OH Correction (mg) m,(mg) = 17.03xV, xN m,,(mg) = 17.03 x ml x 0.1 N = mg Note:Lack of significant figures may cause rounding errors between actual calculations and example calculations. Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Calculations Nomenclature • %CO = carbon monoxide concentration (%) • %CO2 = carbon dioxide concentration (%) • %N2 = nitrogen concentration (%) • %02 = oxygen concentration (%) • %O2,V1et= Oxygen content of gas stream, % by volume of wet gas. (Note: The oxygen percentage used in Method 201A, Equation 3 is on a wet gas basis. That means that since oxygen is typically measured on a dry gas basis, the measured percent 02 must be multiplied by the quantity (1 - Bwj to convert to the actual volume fraction. Therefore, %O2,Wet = 0 - BWs) * %02,dry) • (%EA)a,9 = average excess air(%) • (Fo)av9 = average calculated fuel factor • RA00"lav9 =Average of square roots of the velocity pressures measured during the preliminary traverse, inches W.C. • p = Gas viscosity, micropoise • 12.0 = Constant calculated as 60 percent of 20.5 square inch cross-sectional area of combined cyclone head, square inches • 17.03 = mg/milliequivalents for ammonium ion • 22.4 = liters of ideal gas per mol of substance at 0°C and 1 atm (ref. Civil Engineering Reference Manual, 7th ed. - Michael R. Lindeburg) • 5.02 x 104 = constant derived from the molecular weight and correcting standard temperature and pressure (ref. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Source Test Procedure ST-1 B, Ammonia Integrated Sampling, Adopted January 20, 1982, Regulation 7-303) • A = distance upstream (in.) • AD = stack diameters upstream (dia.) • An =Area of nozzle, square feet • AS = area of stack(ft) • B = distance downstream (in.) • Bp = stack diameters downstream (dia.) • bf=Average blockage factor calculated in Equation 26, dimensionless • Bwm = meter moisture content (%) • BWS = stack moisture content (%) • C = Cunningham correction factor for particle diameter, Dp, and calculated using the actual stack gas temperature, dimensionless • C, _ -150.3162 (micropoise) • C2 = 18.0614 (micropoise/K0,5) = 13.4622 (micropoise/R0,5) • C3 = 1.19183 x 106 (micropoise/K2) = 3.86153 x 106 (micropoise/R2) • C4 = 0.591123 (micropoise) • C5 = 91.9723 (micropoise) • C6 = 4.91705 x 10-5 (micropoise/K2) = 1.51761 x 10-5 (micropoise/R2) • Ca = Acetone blank concentration, mg/mg • Cb = Concentration of NH3 ion in the back half of train (breakthrough) • Cf= Concentration of NH3 ion in the front half of train (main catch) • CfPMlo = Conc. of filterable PM,o, gr/dscf • C'fPM2.5 = Conc. of filterable PM2.5, gr/dscf • Ck= K Factor Constant, 849.8 Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Nomenclature Nomenclature • Cr, = nozzle diameter constant, 0.03575 • Cp, = Coefficient for the pitot used in the preliminary traverse, dimensionless • Cp = Pitot coefficient for the combined cyclone pitot, dimensionless • C'pm = Concentration of the condensable PM in the stack gas, dry basis, corrected to standard conditions, milligrams/dry standard cubic foot. • Cr= Re-estimated Cunningham correction factor for particle diameter equivalent to the actual cut size diameter and calculated using the actual stack gas temperature, dimensionless • D50 = Particle cut diameter, micrometers • D50(N+l)= D50 value for cyclone IV calculated during the N+1 iterative step, micrometers • D50.1 = Re-calculated particle cut diameters based on re-estimated Cr, micrometers • D50LL = Cut diameter for cyclone I corresponding to the 2.25 micrometer cut diameter for cyclone IV, micrometer • D50N = D50 value for cyclone IV calculated during the Nth iterative step, micrometers • D50T= Cyclone I cut diameter corresponding to the middle of the overlap zone shown in Method 201A, Figure 10 of Section 17, micrometers • De = equivalent stack diameter(in.) • AH@ = OH @ 0.75 scfm (in. H2O) • AHav9 = average orifice pressure (in. H2O) • Dr, = Inner diameter of sampling nozzle mounted on Cyclone I, inches • Dna = actual nozzle diameter(in.) • Dp = Physical particle size, micrometers • Ap =velocity head (in. H2O) • Ap, = velocity head at first current traverse point(in. H2O) • Ap 1 = velocity head at first preliminary traverse point(in. H2O) • Apav9 = average pitot tube differential pressure (in. H2O) • Apr, = velocity head at subsequent current traverse point(in. H2O) • ApRM2 = method 2 velocity head (in. H2O) • Ds = diameter of stack (in.) • Fd =fuel f-factor(dscf/MMBtu) • fO2 = stack gas fraction of 02, by volume, dry basis • I = Percent isokinetic sampling, dimensionless • K, = standard volume correction, 17.65°R/in. Hg • K4 = isokinetic conversion constant, 0.0945min•in.Hg/sec•°R • K5=water mass to std water vapor, 0.04715 ft3/g • Kp = 85.49, ((ft/sec)/(pounds/mole OR)) • L = length of stack (in.) • Lam,= distance to far wall of stack (in.) • Lnw= distance to near wall of stack (in.) [reference] • m#X=weight measurements (g) • M, = Milligrams of PM collected on the filter, less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers • M2 = Milligrams of PM recovered from Container#2 (acetone blank corrected), greater than 10 micrometers • M3 = Milligrams of PM recovered from Container#3 (acetone blank corrected), less than or equal to 10 and greater than 2.5 micrometers Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Nomenclature Nomenclature • M4 = Milligrams of PM recovered from Container#4 (acetone blank corrected), less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers • ma = Mass of residue of acetone after evaporation, mg • mo = Mass of the NH4+ added to sample to form ammonium sulfate, mg • mcpm = Mass of the total condensable PM, mg • Md = Molecular weight of dry gas, pounds/pound mole • mfb = Mass of total CPM in field train recovery blank, mg • mf,=final weight, avg of last two measurements (g) • mg = Milligram • mg/L = Milligram per liter • m; = Mass of inorganic CPM, mg • m;b = Mass of inorganic CPM in field train recovery blank, mg • Mn =total particulates (mg) • mo = Mass of organic CPM, mg • mob = Mass of organic CPM in field train blank, mg • mr = Mass of dried sample from inorganic fraction, mg • mt,, = tare weight (g) • MW = molecular weight(lb/lb-mole) • MW= Molecular weight of wet gas, pounds/pound mole • N = Normality of ammonium hydroxide titrant • Na = null angle (deg.) • Nre = Reynolds number, dimensionless • Ntp = Number of iterative steps or total traverse points • Pb = Pbar= barometric pressure (in. Hg) • Pbar= barometric pressure (in. Hg) • ppmCO = carbon monoxide concentration (ppm) • ppmv = Parts per million by volume • ppmw= Parts per million by weight • PS = absolute stack pressure (in. Hg) • Pstat;o= static pressure (in. H2O) • Pstd = standard pressure, 29.92 in. Hg • O = total sampling time (min) • Qaw= average stack wet flow rate (ascf/min) • Q, = Sampling rate for cyclone I to achieve specified D50 • Qm = estimated orifice flow rate, 0.750 acfm, else Vm/Q from previous run • QS = Sampling rate for cyclone I to achieve specified D50 • Qs(std) =total cyclone flow rate at standard conditions (dscf/min) • Qsd = dry standard stack flow rate (dscfm) • QSsT = Dry gas sampling rate through the sampling assembly, dscfm • Q,=wet standard stack flow rate (ascfm) • Rmax= Nozzle/stack velocity ratio parameter, dimensionless • Rm,n = Nozzle/stack velocity ratio parameter, dimensionless • tt = Sampling time at point 1, min • tm = average gas meter temperature (OF) Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Nomenclature Nomenclature • tm = average meter temperature (OF) • Tm = Meter box and orifice gas temperature, OR • to = Sampling time at point n, min • tr= Total projected run time, min • TS =Absolute stack gas temperature, OR • Tstd = standard temperature, 68°F, 528°R • T„ = absolute temperature offset, 460°R • Va =Volume of acetone blank, ml • Vaw=Volume of acetone used in sample recovery wash, ml • Vb =Volume of aliquot taken for IC analysis, ml • Vc = Quantity of water captured in impingers and silica gel, ml • Vf=final impinger volume (ml) • V; = initial impinger volume (ml) • Vic =Volume of impinger contents sample, ml • Vm = Dry gas meter volume sampled, acf • Vm(std)= standard meter volume (dscf) • vmax = Maximum gas velocity calculated from Equations 18 or 19, ft/sec • vmax= maximum nozzle velocity(ft/sec) • Vmf=final dry gas meter reading (dcf) • Vm; = initial dry gas meter reading (dcf) • vm;n = Minimum gas velocity calculated from Method 201A, Equations 16 or 17, ft/sec • Vms = Dry gas meter volume sampled, corrected to standard conditions, dscf • vn = Sample gas velocity in the nozzle, ft/sec • vor9 = organics wash volume (ml) • Vp =Volume of water added during train purge • vs = average stack gas velocity (ft/sec) • vsi = local velocity (ft/sec) • Vt= total impinger volume (ml) = E(Vf-V;) • Vt= Volume of NH4OH titrant, ml • VW(std) =volume of water vapor in gas sample at standard conditions (scf) • vx= blank volume (ml) • W=width of stack (in.) • W2,3,4 = Weight of PM recovered from Containers#2, #3, and #4, mg • Wa =Weight of blank residue in acetone used to recover samples, mg • Wf=final impinger weight(g) • W; = initial impinger weight(g) • Wt=total impinger weight (g) = E(Wf-W;) • wx= blank weight of solids (g) • Y = meter calibration factor(a.k.a gamma) • Z= Ratio between estimated cyclone IV D50 values, dimensionless • y = Dry gas meter gamma value, dimensionless • OH = Meter box orifice pressure drop, inches W.C. • OH@ = Pressure drop across orifice at flow rate of 0.75 scfm at standard conditions, inches W.C. (Note: Specific to each orifice and meter box.) Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Nomenclature Nomenclature • Op, = Velocity pressure measured at point 1, inches W.C. • Opa g =Average velocity pressure, inches W.C. • Opm = Observed velocity pressure using S-type pitot tube in preliminary traverse, inches W.C. • Apm,X= Maximum velocity pressure, inches W.C. • Opm;n = Minimum velocity pressure, inches W.C. • Opn = Velocity pressure measured at point n during the test run, inches W.C. • Ops =Velocity pressure calculated in Method 201 a, Equation 25, inches W.C. • Ops1 = Velocity pressure adjusted for combined cyclone pitot tube, inches W.C. • Ops2 = Velocity pressure corrected for blockage, inches W.C. • 0 = Total run time, min • pa = Density of acetone, mg/ml (see label on bottle) • Y-n =total number of sampling points Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Nomenclature Air Hygiene International, Inc. 5634 S. 122nd East Ave, Suite F SAMPLE DESCRIPTION AND 4 (888) Tulsa, Oklahoma 74146 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD www.airhygien461-8778e.com Project Number: Laboratory Analysis Requested: Person Taking Samples: Gravimetric Sample Number Location Date Volume Analysis Method RM 5 RM 202 -- -- -1-F Unit - Run 1 - Filter N/A X -1-PW Unit - Run 1 - Probe Wash X -1-I1C Unit - Run 1 - Inorganic Impinger Contents X -1-Hex Unit - Run 1 - Organic Impinger Contents X -2-F Unit - Run 2- Filter N/A X -2-PW Unit - Run 2 - Probe Wash X -2-IC Unit - Run 2- Inorganic Impinger Contents X -2-Hex Unit - Run 2 - Organic Impinger Contents X -3-F Unit - Run 3- Filter N/A X -3-PW Unit - Run 3 - Probe Wash X -3-IC Unit - Run 3- Inorganic Impinger Contents X -3-Hex Unit - Run 3 - Organic Impinger Contents X -B1-Acetone Unit - Blank-Acetone 200 X -B2-DI Water Unit - Blank- DI Water 200 X -B3-Hexane Unit - Blank- Hexane 200 X Signature Date Time Signature Date Time Signature Date Time Signature Date Time Isocalc-AHI v5.1 COC TABLE A.1: EMISSIONS TESTING SCHEDULE Unit Load Component Run Date Start Stop Time Sync Preliminaries v1 Particulates 1 Particulates 2 Particulates 3 Isocalc-AHI v5.1 Table A.1 APPENDIX E STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AIR HYGIENE EMISSION Statement: AIR HYGIENE's core philosophy of "Second-to-None (2-2-0)", demands extra mile customer ,I service anchored on dignified character and family-oriented principles to deliver unmatched quality stack testing, worth paying for every time. We utilize revolutionary technology and AIR HYGIENE UNIVERSITY to create the best educated work force to define the future of stack testing. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS AIR HYGIENE AIR EMISSION TESTING SERVICES January, 2018 INTRODUCTION AIR HYGIENE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (AIR HYGIENE) is a professional air emission testing services firm operating from corporate headquarters in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma for 20 years. Additional field offices with ready for field use testing labs are strategically located in Las Vegas, Nevada; Austin and Ft. Worth, Texas; Shreveport, Louisiana; Chicago, Illinois; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to serve all fifty(50) United States, Mexico, and Canada. AIR HYGIENE specializes in air emission testing services for combustion sources burning multiple fuels with multiple control devices and supporting equipment. AIR HYGIENE testing laboratories are equipped with the following capabilities: 1. State-of-the-Art air emission analyzers, computers, and data-logging software! 2. Dual racks for multiple source testing simultaneously or multiple points on a single source (in/out SCR, etc.)! 3. NIST traceable gases for the most accurate calibration. Ranges as low as five (5) ppm! 4. PM10, NH3, mercury(Hg), sulfuric acid mist(H2SO4), S03, and formaldehyde sampling equipment! 5. VOC testing with on-board gas chromatograph to remove methane and ethane! 6. On-board printers to provide hard copies of testing information on-site! 7. Networking capabilities to provide real-time emission data directly into the control room! AIR HYGIENE is known for providing professional services which include the following: • Superior cost effective services to our clients! • Educated work force trained to utilize the latest in revolutionary technology! • Meeting our client's needs whether it is 24 hour a day testing or short notice mobilization! • Using great equipment that is maintained and dependable! • Understanding the unique start-up and operational needs associated with combustion sources! • Experience working with state and federal regulations and agencies in all 50 states! OUR MISSION Our mission is to provide innovative, practical, top-quality services allowing our clients to increase operating efficiency, save money, and comply with federal and state requirements. We believe our first responsibility is to the client. In providing our unique services, the owners of AIR HYGIENE demand ethical conduct from each employee of the company. The character and integrity of AIR HYGIENE employees allows our clients to feel confident in the air testing services of AIR HYGIENE. Through a long-term commitment to this mission, AIR HYGIENE is known as a company committed to improving our clients' operations. TESTING EXPERIENCE AIR HYGIENE has twenty-six (26) QSTI certified personnel on staff and more than two hundred (200) years of combined testing experience. We have completed over 25,000 emission tests and our testing services history includes interaction with all 50 state agencies and EPA regional offices. AIR HYGIENE testing personnel are rigorously trained through our very own AIR HYGIENE UNIVERSITY on EPA reference test methods from 40 CFR Part 51, 60, 63, and 75 along with ASTM methods. All testing personnel are instructed and tested on test responsibilities and must complete a "Demonstration of Capability"test per the AIR HYGIENE Quality Assurance Manual and the AIR HYGIENE Emission Testing Standard OperatingProcedures Handbook. AIR HYGIENE has completed testing on over 500 power plants including in excess of 2,500 combustion turbines and 100 coal fired boilers 250,000 megawatts (MW). Let us add your project to our list of satisfied customers! TESTING SUCCESS STORIES AIR HYGIENE personnel have performed thousands of testing projects which have yielded significant benefits for our clients. The following project descriptions briefly discuss some of these emission testing projects. ➢ Conducted Mercury(Hg), PM, selected metals, HCl, Chlorine, and gas testing to verify status with the industrial boiler MACT on six coal fired units at three (3) locations. ➢ Conducted inlet/outlet baghouse emission testing for Mercury(Hg)to determine control efficiency using Ontario-Hyrdo testing methodology. ➢ Conducted numerous projects optimizing SCR performance by conducting inlet , &outlet SCR analysis for NH3, NO, flow, and Oxygen. Used information to assist with flow optimization and AIG tuning. _- ➢ Conducted federal and state required compliance testing for NO, CO, PM-10 (front& back-half), S02, VOC, Ammonia, Formaldehyde, Opacity, RATA a testing (NOx and CO)for new and updated power plants with both simple and combined cycle turbines firing natural gas and fuel oil. ➢ Conducted dry low NOx burner tuning and performance testing for various models of GE, Siemens Westinghouse, Mitsubishi, Pratt&Whitney, and ABB combustion turbines to verify manufacturer's emission guarantees for clients in preparation for compliance testing. ➢ Performed power plant emission testing for natural gas &fuel oil fired combustion turbines. Tests included federal required testing per 40 CFR Part 75, state air permit requirements, RATA testing, and emission testing to verify manufacturer's guarantees during electric/heat output performance testing. TESTING LOCATIONS SEVEN REGIONAL FIELD OFFICES IN TUIE US AIR HYGIENE bases mobilization charges on the distance from your site to the closest of seven (7) regional starting '' r'�� ri Na points covering all 50 United States. VT FIE NS These include Broken Arrow, Las Vegas, OR ID sa Austin, Ft. Worth, Shreveport, Chicago `'�-Y IA NY ____—NH Pittsburgh. NE IL off A \XIAA United Sta IN �\ Each start point is located such that the CA T co K KY wv VA RI AIR HYGIENE test teams can mobilize to TN NC DE NJ your site within 24 hours at affordable AZ Nra ►AD costs to ensure we are price competitive S AL SC to any U.S. location. T GA LA FL Mexico AOexreo -1 41 _ QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY AIR HYGIENE has received interim accreditation from the Source Testing Accreditation Council (STAC) per ASTM D7036 as an Air Emission Testing Body (AETB). Air Hygiene also maintains current accreditation from LDEQ, CARB, SCAQMD, and PADEP. AIR HYGIENE has twenty-six (26) Qualified Stack Testing Individuals (QSTI) on staff providing testing leadership for every testing project; including a PhD Chemical Engineer who is ACS Certified managing in house laboratory operations and specialty remote wet chemistry projects. AIR HYGIENE ensures the quality and validity of its emission measurement and reporting procedures through a rigorous quality assurance (QA) program. The program is developed and administered by an internal QA team and encompasses five major areas: 1. QA reviews of reports, laboratory work, and field testing; 2. Equipment calibration and maintenance; 3. Chain-of-custody; 4. Training; and 5. Knowledge of current test methods. QA Reviews AIR HYGIENE's review procedure includes review of each source test report, along with laboratory and fieldwork, by the QA Team. The most important review is the one that takes place before a test program begins. The QA Team works closely with technical division personnel to prepare and review test protocols. Test protocol review includes selection of appropriate test procedures, evaluation of interferences or other restrictions that might preclude use of standard test procedures, and evaluation and/or development of alternate procedures. Equipment Calibration and Maintenance The equipment used to conduct the emission measurements is maintained according to the manufacturer's instructions to ensure proper operation. In addition to the maintenance program, calibrations are carried out on each measurement device according to the schedule outlined by the Environmental Protection Agency. Quality control checks are also conducted in the field for each test program. Finally, AIR HYGIENE participates in a PT gas program by analyzing blind gases semi-annually to ensure continued quality. Chain-of-Custody AIR HYGIENE maintains full chain-of-custody documentation on all samples and data sheets. In addition to normal documentation of changes between field sample custodians, laboratory personnel, and field test personnel, AIR HYGIENE documents every individual who handles any test component in the field (e.g., probe wash, impinger loading and recovery, filter loading and recovery, etc.). Samples are stored in a locked area to which only AIR HYGIENE personnel have access. Field data sheets are secured at AIR HYGIENE'S offices upon return from the field. Training Training available to both employees and customers through our very own AIR HYGIENE UNIVERSITY is essential to ensure quality testing. Constantly striving to be recognized globally as the worldwide leader in Stack Testing Training, AIR HYGIENE UNIVERSITY has developed a baseline foundation and curriculum using a unique indoor training facility, practice stack, and over 16 years of real-world field testing experience. AIR HYGIENE UNIVERSITY'S classwork combines customized training modules focusing on presentation, testing, resource utilization, and hands-on experience and the knowledge from each module can be combined to provide a final capstone, a Demonstration of Competency in the subject matter of interest. Participants are prepared to pass the Qualified Individual examinations and obtain Federal certifications and have the ability to apply new and refreshed knowledge about each test method to everyday work practices. Knowledge of Current Test Methods With the constant updating of standard test methods and the wide variety of emerging test procedures, it is essential that any qualified source tester keep abreast of new developments. AIR HYGIENE subscribes to services, which provide updates on EPA reference methods, rules, and regulations. Additionally, source test personnel regularly attend and present papers at testing and emission-related seminars and conferences. TESTING QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES A number of quality assurance activities are undertaken before, during, and after turbine testing projects. This section describes each of those activities. Each instrument's response is checked and adjusted in the field prior to the collection of data via multi-point calibration. The instrument's linearity is checked by first adjusting its zero and span responses to zero nitrogen and an upscale calibration gas in the range of the expected concentrations. The instrument response is then challenged with other calibration gases of known concentration and accepted as being linear if the response of the other calibration gases agreed within ±two percent of range of the predicted values. NO2 to NO conversion is checked via direct connect with an EPA Protocol certified concentration of NO2 in a balance of nitrogen. Conversion is verified to be above 90 percent. Instruments are both factory-tested and periodically field challenged with interference gases to verify the instruments have less than a two percent interference from CO2, SO2, CO, NO, and 02. After each test run, the analyzers are checked for zero and span drift. This allows each test run to be bracketed by calibrations and documents the precision of the data collected. The criterion for acceptable data is that the instrument drift is no more than three percent of the full-scale response. Quality assurance worksheets summarize all multipoint calibration linearity checks and the zero to span checks performed during the tests are included in the test report. The sampling systems is leak checked by demonstrating that a vacuum greater than 10 in. Hg can be held for at least one minute with a decline of less than 1 in. Hg. A leak test is conducted after the sample system is set up and before the system is dismantled. This test is conducted to ensure that ambient air does not dilute the sample. Any leakage detected prior to the tests is repaired and another leak check conducted before testing will commence. The absence of leaks in the sampling system is also verified by a sampling system bias check. The sampling system's integrity is tested by comparing the responses of the analyzers to the responses of the calibration gases introduced via two paths. The first path is directly into the analyzers and the second path includes the complete sample system with injection at the sample probe. Any difference in the instrument responses by these two methods is attributed to sampling system bias or leakage. The criterion for acceptance is agreement within five percent of the span of the analyzer. The control gases used to calibrate the instruments are analyzed and certified by the compressed gas vendors to± one percent accuracy for all gases. EPA Protocol No.1 is used, where applicable, to assign the concentration values traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST), Standard Reference Materials (SRM). The gas calibration sheets as prepared by the vendor are included in the test report. 17 6 Testing Solutions for a Better World EMISSION TESTING TEAM Air Hygiene International, Inc. (AIR HYGIENE) intends to exceed your expectations on every project. From project management to field-testing teams, we're committed to working hard on your behalf. The job descriptions and flow chart below outline AIR HYGIENE's client management strategy for your testing services. From the initial request through receipt of the purchase order, the Inquisition to Order(ITO)team strives to inform every client of the benefits gained by using AIR HYGIENE for their emission testing project. The ITO team includes representatives from the sales, marketing, operations, and contracts divisions. In addition, several support staff assist to ensure the ITO team provides the support for client ITO Team needs as requested by a client or project manager. Project Managers are the primary contact for clients and Air Hygiene ultimately responsible for every emission testing project. Project Manager ......•• AIR HYGIENE's Project Managers include seventeen (17) QSTI certified testing experts with experience ranging from those with a masters level, to professional engineers to industry experts with over 25,000 testing projects completed. Each project is assigned Testing Test Test p p 1 g Managers Engineers Technicians a Project Manager based primarily upon geographic location, industry experience, contact history, and availability. start D The Project Manager prepares the testing Eng strategy and organization for the project. This includes preparation of testing protocol; coordination with state agencies, client representatives, and any interested third parties. The site testing and report preparation are executed under the direction of the Project Manager from start to finish. Testing Managers have completed Air Hygiene's rigorous demonstration of capability training program and are capable of operating all testing equipment and performing all test methods required for your testing project. Testing Managers assist Project Managers by leading the field testing when required, preparing draft reports, calibrating equipment, and overseeing the testing team on-site. AIR HYGIENE'S staff includes seven (7) QSTI certified testing managers. Test Engineers have significant background and understanding of emission testing or related services. Test Engineers prepare pre-test drawings for port location, ensure on-site logistics for electrical and mechanical/structural needs, and conduct on-site testing as directed by the Project Manager and/or Testing Manager. Test Engineers often have special understanding of process and/or regulations applicable to specific testing jobs, which provide great value to both the client and Project Manager in testing strategies.AIR HYGIENE'S staff includes two (2) QSTI certified testing managers. Test Technicians experience ranges from new hire with technical degree and experience to technicians who have performed 500 emission tests. All test technicians have a basic understanding of emission training and are involved in daily training and under supervision to continue to develop testing skills. Each has testing experience with AIR HYGIENE equipment along with a variety of industries and source equipment. Test Technicians may operate isokinetic sampling trains or gas analyzers on-site under the direction of the Project Manager and assist with preparation of field reports and quality assurance procedures. Staff Technicians are entry-level personnel who have performed fewer than 500 emission tests. Staff Technicians perform pre-test equipment preparation, on-site test preparation, and testing assistance under the direction of Project Manager and/or Testing Manager. Staff Technicians connect sampling probes to ports, raise and lower equipment to and from sampling platform, and other support activities under the direction of the Project Manager and/or Testing Manager. PhD Chemical Engineer/Lab Manager our in house, ACS Certified Lab Manager manages in house laboratory operations and is available for specialty remote wet chemistry projects on site to provide added expertise and accuracy. i o y 0 y bA o N N U �" •� O N cd ct •C U El m oN 0 O 4 o on a 0 p 0 Cl O '� � S•i O � ,� Q y Oc� cz O U U 4 M c w wJ m O .4 O •^ � Q ,O O � -C �, U �, Q' � 'C U U O 5c�•i O �r" � � Cd }Oj � Q Q� � O •� .� �1 w U U ;� w •O C -� " •r.� Al, .4 cn —1 —lu N 0 4.1 Cn 0 U • � U o o Z � � 3 � N � � N U U U W N � N U U cn vA p U Ca al A P. Y c ? o zt Ocz zt Q S �,• VIE�.1 t.� O 4*4 CIO ci N t t o � u a W Y V Q n 'O c ID 0 0' Q, N LO V N W aOc > ' U � OU m C Q- N c M O .Q` `'41 E vi � 0 a) E ' o � 0 O a) o O d O U O 'L N — a) K Y > p � M LLJ H _0O U c E L o o C O 4- O ul L C (0 E > 0 co Q U O O v Ct3 x �, �- o m cnUl i F� —', X N 0 Q � C � a� o o � E w E O O E L) 0 o a O U ~ ~ �' c '`1) -0 _0 O .� > E o O E Q W Q � M `° " Co J p to — cn W U X U c O _ (6 U Q) � O O — O c N �— cv �' (n a) O Q 0 O O L p c U) � o O L On � J r a) m a) w >. E _) U UQ0 � vi N c � U) cn U 0 cop O U .c o0 v .4--+ UN C L Z c _ rillN o m U o X U M Q co N W n, m U Q m 0 00 L W x M O) O N N 1 z c . ca O O U n M p O O Q Z c 0 — c a) (n 4.. "' o U MU) � Oc U > :r ;,_ C •— (ff O U cn a) a�iCL (0 : O U W W O o U) o U - c � - U m O 1- m — Q O a) Z) -0 C L m 0 c �0 ,r0 c °' .o CL 0 1 20 Lo . V N W Q i .0 > U m c 0' Q O U' c O � o EZ� n0E E � O O v , 0 0 O U � U) o •L Na + � 0) X c L ui W m c O N +- O co c U O « _ i '- c � O 6- > (V C L U N cn c U CD cn � w o CIO E W Q � U O �} Ln E �+ V .0 C ( K X Wn Cl) N Q Lu � m4""' O �_ Q 0 (n 7 U 4- O o E CL W Q U) U (� U N � 0 O C 0- Q o CD CO E .� Q � ~ o � L o '� a) � E E .U) (t3 O n l L W Q c <n N c 70 _r coo W E O m -0 o : 0 o O L O +. U N 0 00 U U m b L U L Z c U M a) am o �a tn U) � .Q � � o g � '-E o x U w N W U O_ C ~ N W _ . N z v- .�O L Qf N O O } fl M 0) � Q c O Q a? O o — Z rt 0 N ` O m m O C U) (II p U N C m Q L (o O U W W O -0 U C m U (o o L Q. O a) c L C L (LS This page intentionally left blank End of document F,* kdbkeep denton beautiful ��ep Dc�tov Bea�r�e 608 E.Hickory St.Suite 130,Denton,TX 76205 P:940.349.8737 F:940.349.8396 Contact:Autumn Natalie KDB Event &Outreach Coordinator Phone: (940) 349-8711 1 Fax: (940) 349-8396 Email: autumn@kdb.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Keep Denton Beautiful Announces Great American Cleanup Results Volunteers clean up thousands of pounds of litter from Denton community March 29, 2018 - Denton, TX—On Saturday, March 24, nonprofit organization Keep Denton Beautiful,Inc. (KDB) hosted its 30,, Annual Great American Cleanup (GAC), a community-wide litter cleanup effort. A total of 2,236 volunteers participated including local families, Boy and Girl Scout troops, school and university organizations, City leaders, and others. Nearly NINE AND A HALF TONS of litter(989.5 bags of trash and 274.5 bags of recycling) were cleaned from 100 linear miles of roadway around Denton, plus more than a dozen parks, trails, and school campuses.Volunteer participants contributed a collective 4,548 hours of volunteer time,worth an estimated $109,789. Volunteers were recognized for their work at the post-cleanup Volunteer Party at Quakertown Park from 11 a.m.to 1 p.m., which included live music from local bluegrass band,Tallgrass;free lunch for volunteers courtesy of Leila's Food Truck and Milpa Kitchen &Cantina;educational activities; bounce houses; and awards. The following groups received awards for their volunteer efforts: Most Bags Collected: Robson Ranch Softball Association with 78 bags of trash and recycling Largest Volunteer Group: Sonlight Enrichment Program with 48 total volunteers Oddest Item Found: Cosery Volunteer Crew for their"getaway bag" consisting of a wig, a fake beard, and glasses Denton Mayor Chris Watts attended the Volunteer Party to give a special thank you to volunteers. "This is the 30t"year of this event;what a tradition! It's important to keep our city clean," said Mayor Watts to a crowd of GAC volunteers. "A clean city means we are more vibrant and have a better quality of life." GAC is part of a nationwide effort with Keep America Beautiful, and Denton is one of more than 20,000 communities that participate each spring. Sites are selected citywide, and include roadways, streams and shorelines, and public areas such as parks. KDB tracks litter rates in the community throughout the year to help target areas that are most in need of cleanup.Community members can participate in these tracking efforts, or make recommendations for sites to be included in future cleanups, by emailing volunteer@kdb.org or by calling (940) 349-8737. This year's Great American Cleanup was made possible through community contributions and sponsorships, including generous support from the City of Denton (COD) Solid Waste & Recycling Department; COD Watershed Protection; Denton Municipal Electric; COD Parks & Recreation Department; Fulton Supply& Recycling; Rayzor Ranch Town Center, the Denton Record-Chronicle,- Pan Ector Industries; Leila's Food Truck; Milpa Kitchen &Cantina;with additional support from Beth Marie's Old Fashioned Ice Cream, Fuzzy's Taco Shop, Kroger, Recycled Books, Seven Mile Cafe, Sleeping Lizzards, Starbucks (Rayzor Ranch), Steve's Wine Bar, and Thai Square. Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc. is a nonprofit organization that offers community improvement opportunities and environmental education programs for the benefit of Denton neighborhoods, businesses, and residents of all ages.The mission of KDB is to engage our community in creating a clean and beautiful Denton. For more information,visit www.kdb.org. Keep Denton Beautiful,Inc.is an affiliate of Keep Texas Beautiful and Keep Americal Beautiful,Inc. Date: March 30,2018 No. 2018-035 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Denco Area 9-1-1 Appointment to District Board of Managers DISCUSSION: The City has received a request (attached) from Mark Payne, Executive Director for Denco Area 9-1-1 District, for nominations of individuals to serve on the Denco Board of Managers. The Denco Area 9-1-1 District was created in 1987, and is governed by a board of managers appointed by the County, participating cities, and the Denton County Fire Chief s Association. Board members serve staggered two-year terms and are eligible for reappointment. A list of the current Board Members is attached to the memorandum. Each year, the term of one of the two members appointed by participating municipalities expires. This year, Mr. Jim Carter's second term expires on September 30, 2018. Members are eligible for consecutive terms. Mr. Carter has expressed his desire to serve a third term. A copy of his resume is attached. Nominations must reach Denco on or before June 15, 2018. If you have a nominee for consideration by City Council, please contact me by May 19, 2018, and it will be considered at the June 5, 2018, Council Meeting. On June 16, 2018, Denco will send copies of nominations to each city for consideration, requesting the city to vote for one of the nominees. Requests for votes from Council will occur at an August 2018 Council meeting. If you have any questions,please contact me. ATTACHMENTS Memorandum from Denco Area 9-1-1 District List of current Board Members Mr. Jim Carter's Resume STAFF CONTACT: Antonio Puente, Jr. Director of Finance (940) 349-7283 Antonio.Puente(a,cityofdenton.com stiDenco Area 9-1 -1 District 1075 Princeton Street Lewisville,TX 75067 • Mailing:PO BOX 293058 . Lewisville,TX 75029-3058 DENCO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT Phone;972-221-0911 Fax:972-420-0709 TO: Denco Area 9-1-1 District Participating Municipal Jurisdictions FROM: Mark Payne, Executive Director A� DATE: March 15, 2018 RE: Appointment to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers Chapter 772,Texas Health and Safety Code, provides for the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers to have "two members appointed jointly by all the participating municipalities located in whole or part of the district." The enclosed resolution, approved by the district's board of managers on March 10, 2016, describes the appointment process of a municipal representative to the Denco Board of Managers. Each year on September 301h, the term of one of the two members appointed by participating municipalities expires. This year it is the term of Jim Carter. Members are eligible for consecutive terms and Mr. Carter has expressed his desire to serve another term. In order to coordinate the appointment among 33 participating municipalities, Denco requests the following actions by the governing bodies of each city/town: 1. Immediate Action (Nominate): If your city/town would like to nominate a candidate to represent the municipalities on the Denco Board of Managers, please send a letter of nomination, by way of council action, and resume of the candidate to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District office. For a nomination to be considered, written notification of council action must reach the Denco Area 9-1-1 District by 5:00 p.m.June 15,2018. No nominations shall be considered after that time. 2. Future Action (Vote): On June 16, 2018, Denco staff will send the slate of nominees to each city/town for consideration, requesting the city/town council vote by resolution for one of the nominees. Written notice of the council's selection must reach the Denco Area 9-1-1 District by 5:00 p.m.on September 15,2018. No votes will be accepted after that time. 3. Process Closure (Results): The Denco Board of Managers and all municipal jurisdictions will be informed of the votes from responding cities/towns.The candidate with the most votes will be the municipalities' representative to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers for the two-year term beginning October 1, 2018. Please send a copy of your council's official action and candidate resume to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District, 1075 Princeton Street, Lewisville, TX 75067 or to Andrea Zepeda at andrea.xepeda@denco.ore. Denco staff will acknowledge receipt and sufficiency of the submitted documents. If that acknowledgement is not received within one(1)business day,or you have any other questions, please contact Ms.Zepeda at 972-221-0911.As a courtesy, Denco will provide notification of your council's action to the nominee. A sample nomination resolution has been enclosed foryour convenience.Thank you for your support of the Denco Area 9-1-1 District. c: Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers Enclosures www.denco.org 2016.03.10.AI.08 DENCO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT RESOLUTION DEFINING PROCEDURE FOR APPOINTMENT OF PARTICIPATING MUNICIPALITIES'REPRESENTATIVE TO THE DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS WHEREAS,this resolution shall take the place of Resolution 1999.02.04.1101 by the same title;and WHEREAS, Chapter 772,Texas Health and Safety Code provides for the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers to have "two members appointed Jointly by all the participating municipalities located in whole or part of the district,";and WHEREAS,each member serves a term of two years beginning on October 13t of the year member is appointed; and WHEREAS, one member representing participating municipalities Is appointed each year. NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE DENCO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS: The procedure for participating municipalities to appoint a representative to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers shall be the following: 1. Nominate Candidate: Prior to March 15th of each year, the executive director shall send a written notice to the mayor of each participating municipality advising that nominations are being accepted until June 15th of that same year,for one of the municipal representatives to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers. The notice shall advise the mayors that for a nomination to be considered, written notification of council action must be received at the Denco office prior to 5:00 p.m. on June 15th of that year.No nominations shall be considered after that time. 2, Vote for Candidate:On June 16th of each year,the executive director shall send written notice to the mayor of each participating municipality,providing the slate of nominees to be considered for appointment to the Denco Area 9-1-1 District Board of Managers for the term beginning October 151.The notice shall advise the mayor that the city/town council shall vote, by resolution from such city/town,for one of the nominees.Written notice of the council's selection must be received at the district office by 5,00 p.m. on September 15th. No votes will be accepted after that time. 3. Tally Votes:The one nominee with the most votes received by the deadline will be the municipal representative appointed for the two-year term beginning October 111 4. Tie Breaker: If there Is a tie between two candidates with the most votes, a runoff election will be held Immediately with the candidate receiving the most votes serving the remainder of the term. The incumbent representative shall serve in that position until replaced. APPROVED and ADOPTED on this 101h day of March 2016. Ch r ian of the Board Secrets of the Board Council Resolution No. A RESOLUTION NOMINATING ONE CANDIDATE TO A SLATE OF NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE DENCO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Section 772, Health and Safety Code, provides that two voting members of the Board of Managers of an Emergency Communications District shall be appointed jointly by all cities and towns lying wholly or partly within the District; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY/TOWN OF TEXAS: Section 1 The City/ Town of _ hereby NOMINATES as a candidate for appointment to the Board of Managers of the Denco Area 9-1-1 District. Section 2 That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2018. Mayor City/ Town of ATTEST; APPROVED AS TO FORM: City/ Town Secretary City/Town Attorney Council Resolution No. A RESOLUTION NOMINATING ONE CANDIDATE TO A SLATE OF NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE DENCO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Section 772, Health and Safety Code, provides that two voting members of the Board of Managers of an Emergency Communications District shall be appointed jointly by all cities and towns lying wholly or partly within the District; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY/ TOWN OF TEXAS: Section 1 The City/Town of hereby NOMINATES as a candidate for appointment to the Board of Managers of the Denco Area 9-1-1 District. Section 2 That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2018. Mayor City/Town of ATTEST; City/Town Secretary About Us—Denco 9-1-1 Page 1 of 2 DENCO AREA HOME ABOUT US 9-1-1 TRAINING T U - J1 Governance About Us Mission & Goals History Who We Serve What We Deliver r I Governance Financial Staff Contact Jack Miller Bill Lawrence Assistant Chief Annual Representing Denton Representing Denton Terry McGrath Reports County County Representing Denton Commissioners Commissioners County Fire Chiefs • FY2017 Court, Board Court, Board Vice Association, Board • FY2016 Chairman Chairman Secretary • FY2015 • FY2014 http://www.denco.org/governance 3/28/2018 About Us—Denco 9-1-1 Page 2 of 2 Board Agenda 2018 DEN CO AREA 9-1-1 DISTRICT • January 2018 S • March 2018 T A 2017 CAREERSI Copper Canyon • January 2017 Jim Carter Mayor Sue Tejml Rob McGee • March 2017 Representing Representing Verizon Advisory • June 2017 Participating Cities Participating Cities • July 2017 • September 2017 • November 2017 2016 • January 2016 • March 2016 • June 2016 • September 2016 • November 2016 ©Copyright Denco Area 9-1-1 District. All rights reserved worldwide. Search http://www.denco.org/governance 3/28/2018 JIM CARTER 6101 Long Prairie Road, Suite 744-110 (817) 239-7791 Flower Mound,Texas 75028 jcarter@halff.com EDUCATION College Degree: University of Georgia, B.B.A. Finance Post Graduate: Georgia Tech, University of Tennessee, University of Michigan, Texas Women's University, American Management Association PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Department Head, Finance General Motors Corporation Senior Vice-President Frito-Lay, Inc., International and Domestic Development President, C.E.O Mercantile Corporation Responsible for 3 Banks, developed 2,000 prime commercial acres in Fort Worth adjacent to 1-35W Current: Principal James P. Carter&Associates—Consultant& Mediator To business and governmental entities Professional Licenses Texas Real Estate License, Certified Mediator PUBLIC SERVICE EXPERIENCE Mayor Trophy Club,Texas— 14 years Municipal Court Judge Trophy Club,Texas— 12 years County Commissioner Denton County, Texas—8 years Vice President Texas Association of Counties President Denton County Emergency Services District#1 Fire and Emergency Medical over 56 square miles Serving 5 municipalities: (Argyle, Bartonville, Copper Canyon, Corral City and Northlake); Lantana Freshwater Supply Districts #6 and #7 and rural areas of Denton County Texas State Board Member SAFE-D—Trains Emergency Services District Commissioners Board Member Denco 911 Emergency telecommunications system that assists its member jurisdictions in responding to police, fire and medical emergency calls. COMMUNITY AND CHARITY SERVICES Baylor Healthcare System Trustee— 10 Years University of North Texas President's Council Texas Student Housing Corp Chairman— 20 Years, providing Residential Scholarships at UNT, A&M, UT Austin Boy Scouts of America Longhorn Council, District Chairman First Baptist Church, Trophy Club Chairman, Stewardship Committee American Heart Association Board of Directors, Celebrity Waiter BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS North Texas Council of Governments Transportation Board Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce Chairman, North Area Chamber Annual Golf Tournament Economic Development Council Governmental Affairs Committee Texas Alliance for Growth Legislative Committee Greater Fort Worth Area Northeast Leadership Forum Board of Directors, Chairman Mayors Forum, Chairman Legislative Committee Metroport Partnership Founding Member and Chairman Northwest Community Partners Founding Member, Chairman Board of Directors Industrial Developer Association Developer Representative Honors: Who's Who in the South and Southwest, Who's Who in U.S. Executives Date: March 30, 2018 Report No.2018-036 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: City's Emergency Response Framework EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with details regarding the Emergency Response Framework. DISCUSSION: Emer eenncy Management Plan Framework The State Disaster Act requires jurisdictions to prepare Emergency Management Plans (EMPs) that follow the Texas Division of Emergency Management(TDEM)planning standards. The purpose of these plans is to reduce vulnerability of the communities' damage, injury, and loss resulting from natural or man-made catastrophes. There are basic, intermediate, and advanced level plans that cover mitigation,preparedness, response, and recovery. The City of Denton maintains an advanced level plan,which enables the City to be eligible for homeland security and other federal preparedness grants. The EMP is updated on a five year cycle. The current version is dated July 2014, and is undergoing revisions for renewal submission to TDEM late summer or early fall of 2018. Additionally, the EMP is supplemented by companion documents including the Technology Services' Business Continuity Plan, Local Mitigation Strategy, Emergency Operations Center Standard Operating Framework, and departmental response procedures. Emergency Operations Center The City's Emergency Operations Center(EOC) is located at Central Fire Station. The EOC is the physical location designed to support emergency response, business continuity, and crisis communications activities. The City's Executive Staff and/or the Incident Management Team meet at the EOC, as needed for table top planning exercises. During activation the EOC is used to manage preparations for an impending event, or an ongoing incident. By gathering the decision makers together in a central location and supplying them with the most current information,better decisions can be made. Activating the EOC The City has four emergency alert levels. The Emergency Management Coordinator will issue the alerts to the City's Emergency Response Teams: High Water Group, Swift Water Rescue Team, and/or Incident Management Team, as conditions warrant through the Hiplink messaging system. Level 4 is activated when the forecast is predicting possible severe storms threatening the City of Denton in the next 24 hours. Potential technological emergencies may necessitate the issuance of Date: March 30, 2018 Report No.2018-036 a Level 4 Alert as a precaution including a suspicious explosive device, planned civil protest/potential unrest, small-scale hazardous material incident, etc. Additional weather conditions include: tornado watch, flash flood watch, severe thunderstorm watch, and winter storm watch. Level 3 is activated when a situation has escalated to hazardous conditions such as active flash flooding, sustained high winds, tornado, large grass fires, major hazardous material incident, etc. Additionally, hurricane shelter operations are included in this level along with: tornado warning, flash flood warning, and severe thunderstorm warning. Level 2 occurs when a major disaster event with extensive damage to the city such as from a large tornado, wide-scale flash flooding, a significant hazardous materials incident, or other substantial natural or technological disasters. Shelter operations where City of Denton recreation center(s) are used as shelter sites following an evacuation,would typically be a Level 2 Alert requiring a significant amount of City resources and coordination of activities by Incident Management Team. Level 1 is activated when a catastrophic disaster is impacting or imminent for the City of Denton. This severe situation will necessitate use of all or a vast majority of available City personnel and resources over an extended period of time. Mutual-aid assistance may be needed from other communities, state, and federal agencies. Examples include a direct hit from an EF4 or EF5 tornado with mass casualties and numerous fatalities, hazardous materials release involving a substance immediately dangerous to life and health requiring mass evacuation and shelter operations, massive flash flooding impacting a significant portion of the city, domestic terrorism incident, and other large-scale events that will overwhelm local response capabilities. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Penaluna, Emergency Management Coordinator (940) 349-8836 Michael.Penaluna@cityofdenton.com Date: March 30,2018 Report No. 2018-037 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Update on repairs to fencing, headstones and a mausoleum at Oakwood and IOOF Cemeteries. BACKGROUND: Cemetery Fencing Project - Funding in the amount of$180,000 was approved in the 2005 CIP for the replacement of existing chain link fences at both IOOF and Oakwood Cemeteries. When fence permits were applied for, staff was notified that a historical Certificate of Appropriateness would be required to replace the fences. Staff was also informed that the chain link fences envisioned in the 2005 CIP would not be an acceptable replacement. Teague, Nall, and Perkins was hired to design the replacement fences. Their staff facilitated presentations with the Historical Landmark Commission and Denton County Historian, Peggy Riddle resulting in the design of a fence to meet the specifications noted by the Historic Landmark Commission. A Certificate of Appropriateness (COA13-0012) was applied for on May 31, 2013 and awarded on July 08, 2013 to Oakwood Cemetery stipulating that the existing chain link fence would need to be replaced with decorative iron fence with stone columns that matched the existing WPA era stone walls in the central business district. A decorative ornamental fence was not required for IOOF Cemetery, but since it is a gateway to the City, a similar decorative fence was planned to be installed. Chain link fence will remain in some non-focal areas of IOOF. On May 2, 2017, City Council requested funding from the General Fund balance be appropriated to allow an expansion of fencing at the cemeteries. On May 9, 2017, City Council approved ID 17-579 to amend the FY2017 Budget and Annual Program of Services adjusting the General Fund in the amount of$375,000 for the purpose of funding fencing improvements at City cemeteries. On December 12, 2017, City Council accepted competitive proposals and awarded a best value public works contract for the construction of IOOF and Oakwood Cemetery fences to Rockstar Welding, LLC in the not-to-exceed amount of$442,873.20. On December 21, 2017, a Notice to Proceed was provided to Rockstar Welding, LLC. to commence work on the IOOF (Exhibit A) and Oakwood Cemetery (Exhibit B) fencing on or before January 2, 2018. Work is being conducted under permit 1709-0336 for Oakwood and 1709-0338 for IOOF. The project is to be completed within 134 calendar days preceding a period of 15 days of mobilization upon issuance of the Notice to Proceed. The contract completion date is June 1, 2018. Additional alternatives selected in this bid call for the contractor to remove the existing chain link fence in the areas where the new fence is scheduled to be installed. As of March 21, 2018, Oakwood Cemetery is in the process receiving 2,560 linear feet of Date: March 30,2018 Report No. 2018-037 ornamental fencing (Exhibit C) with ball point finials and 14 stone columns as well as an arched entryway sign spanning the entry drive. The following portions of the project are complete: • Demolition of existing fence is complete. • Concrete mow strip with integral fence posts on is complete on Sycamore Street, Bradshaw Street, and Prairie Street. • Concrete mow strip for chain link fence between Oakwood Cemetery and Fred Moore Park is complete. • Ornamental Iron fence panels are 30% complete on the south side of Prairie Street. (Existing chain link to remain on the west perimeter between Trinity Industries and St. Emanuel Baptist Church. • Ornamental fence column piers, bases, and CMU supports are complete. Rock fagade is pending. • Arched entry structural support piers have been poured and certified by D&S Engineering. Pouring of the 14 foot concrete structural supports and erection of the ornamental entry are pending. Structural cages have been prefabricated on site for the concrete arched entry. Also, as of March 21, 2018, IOOF Cemetery is in the process of receiving 1,960 linear feet of ornamental fencing (Exhibit D) with ball point finials and 14 stone columns as well as an arched entryway sign spanning the entry drive. The following portions of the project are complete: • Removal of existing fence wire mesh is complete. Posts remain until work transitions to this property to minimize pedestrian hazards. • Demolition of unused asphalt paved area and steel guardrail is complete. Additional hauling demolition material is still required. • Arched entry structural support piers have been poured and certified by D&S Engineering. Pouring of the 14 foot concrete structural supports and erection of the ornamental entry are pending. Structural cages have been prefabricated on site for the concrete arched entry. • The contract calls for work to take place at IOOF for only the length of Carroll and Eagle Streets. The existing chain link fence will remain and additional repairs will be considered for future projects (Exhibit E). Monument Repairs Project—At City Council's request, staff presented a scope of work on April 4, 2017, that included an assessment of Oakwood and IOOF cemeteries, GIS mapping, and monument restoration. Staff was given direction to proceed with monument restoration, prioritizing those most in need of repair. Supplemental packages were approved as part of the budget process in FY2017 for a total of $152,596. This funding was used to complete both Phase I and II of the monument repairs. A total of 249 headstones at the cemeteries have been repaired. Repairs consist of remounting, resetting the foundations and reconstructing damaged headstones along with repairing one mausoleum. Below is a breakdown on total costs associated with the repairs. Examples of the repairs can be seen on Exhibits F and G. Date: March 30,2018 Report No. 2018-037 • Phase I- $48,113.50 (67 monuments repaired) • Phase II - $104,310.50 (182 monuments repaired) A Phase III of emergency monument repairs is estimated to cost $24,677. This would complete repairs to an additional 43 monuments at IOOF Cemetery. At the conclusion of Phase III, all emergency headstone repairs would be completed. Additional mausoleum, lawn crypt, and fencing repairs will still be needed. Due to the fact that bid received for the cemetery fence replacement was under initial estimates, a balance of $49,106.24 remains. With this remaining balance, Phase III of the monument repairs and any fencing improvement priorities will be completed to improve the overall safety and beautification of the properties. ATTACHMENT(S): Exhibit A - IOOF Cemetery Fence Repair Map Exhibit B—Oakwood Cemetery Fence Repair Map Exhibit C—Oakwood Cemetery Fence Project Update Exhibit D—IOOF Cemetery Fence Project Update Exhibit E—IOOF Cemetery Existing Chain Link Fence Exhibit F—Oakwood Cemetery Monument Repairs Update Exhibit G—IOOF Cemetery Monument Repairs Update STAFF CONTACT: Gary Packan Director of Parks and Recreation Gary.Packan&cityofdenton.com Piercing Denton ' r , ' `♦Lewis&Passons, .I Gazebo Apartments 0) °'� Maid In America t A m °0' �y Place TooBe Prop +� giil ncnc S Highland S HighI nd W Highla ExistingChain Link Fence M o w c * t - IOOF Cemetery A r- w Wells Far _ AW • 4 o Decorative Fence I J i 1II aylelDr_ agle Dr denton " Western pion s o Pro Super Lube ly„ + Sycamore St Decorative Fence �s. a = Ln S d Oakwor-� ietery :E •�- s Existing Chainr �• airie Street Irof Christ Link Fence raihFSt'-�='— E Prairie St n s v7 Replacing Chain Link Feme L Fred Moore" 0° Park OAKWOOD CEMETERY EXHIBIT C FENCE PROJECT UPDATE " 3AAA II d i s ■ IIIIIIIIU 1111111 � •II��1� I � �� _ a �� " IOOF CEMETERY FENCE PROJECT EXHIBIT D UPDATE � 1 J BEC'N el Ae y, >� is BE IN o.. _ - 1 n " Y- as vy` IOOF CEMETERY EXISTING EXHIBIT E CHAIN LINK FENCE TO REMAIN '..,r f'•"f` -�- 1 ,_ _ "�. 1' _�' _. 1 __ ,ter tt 'f ,Jf • ol 1 al,siR �t 111 n a7 lJ11l.1fmi!i1■15Ki1uA1t � vu■ � 1f�•�.�� 1.1{ +algUu�UlUlNsi+9lot �� y- II� ,. (i•I�Il�tll■�itl'.�tUl■/�� ul� ■ufuuo_..•. i✓. / OlOrtalllQ Cl q ld1Ul�li!! ■I(1lLAL�11!1A1',""'('• iF it jr4i U,, ko .b_._T id. il_ IIII �.I6IBIn W 10Afflim11V QA,O LJ,W, MON; N Mid T �.• IT tAA ti Not r Ali sip rry 1'}�■ ililil'�'l>i�� I- ■.� ilJa` j !�'1'�� "' •err 161ii Hit bodo",Ul110, 1 ,111 11 ill tal�lll ul. °��ihi'nn l I rl�'IIIC yl�llerl.. ►ti►� , _,�. IIlllIL�. •i:Y6��s r�ts,di[iL .�i ..�I tq N.� ,:�-mc�.^�.1111.fit. IOOF CEMETERY EXHIBIT G MONUMENT REPAIRS ChJ BEFORE 1 I _.L. �. AFTER Date: March 30, 2018 Report No. 2018-038 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Update on Small Cellular Antennas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council Member Briggs recently requested an update on the City of Denton's effort in the small cellular antenna(small cell) technology implementation. BACKGROUND: According to the cellular industry, small cellular antennas(small cell or small nodes)are necessary as consumers continue to migrate towards solely using cellular communications in their homes and businesses. The industry also claims that additional network coverage is necessary due to public demand. This is also the technology strategy the cellular industry is using at is begins deploying the new 5G technology. The cellular industry lobbied for small cell technology legislation during the 85th Legislative Session. As a result, the Texas Legislature passed and Governor Abbott signed into law, Senate Bill 1004 (codified as Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 284). The law was made effective statewide on September 1, 2017. The new law mandated that Texas cities follow certain requirements and methodologies to permit wireless companies to install small cellular nodes on new and existing utility poles within the City's right-of-way. The law has eroded the City's ability to manage its right-of-way by establishing the maximum fees cities can charge, the timing in which permits must be reviewed and approved, and prohibited the ability to deny requests or place moratoriums on additional device installations. In anticipation of the law going into effect, the City Council approved on August, 22, 2017, ordinance numbers 2017-042, 2017-043 (repealed by 2017-277), 2017-244, and 2017-245, that locally codified the implementation of Chapter 284 of the Texas Local Government Code. To this end, city staff within the CMO, City Attorney's Office, Public Works Inspection, and DME have established processes, procedures, and criteria manuals to properly and safely implement the requirements of the law. To date, AT&T, Verizon Wireless, and Mobilitie have inquired and met with City staff about the City's permitting processes. A few applications have been submitted for review but have been rejected because of missing elements required by state law or did not comply with the City's ordinances. As a result,no permits have been issued at this time. Staff continues to work with the cellular providers to assist them through the application process. As additional background material, the AIS, PowerPoint, and associated ordinances adopted on August 22, 2017, is included below. Date: March 30, 2018 Report No. 2018-038 ATTACHMENT(S): 1. AIS - Small Cellular Antenna/Node dated August 22, 2017 2. PowerPoint presentation— Small Cell dated August 22, 2017 STAFF CONTACT: Mario Canizares, City Manager's Office 940-349-8235 Mario.Canizares&cityofdenton.com City of Denton City Hall 4.vldibw� 215 E.McKinney Street DENTON Denton,Texas www.cityofdenton.com AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CM/DCM/ACM: Mario Canizares DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton adopting and approving a design manual in accordance with Chapter. 284, Deployment of Network Nodes in Public Right-of-Way, Tex. Local Gov't code; and providing an effective date. BACKGROUND In the 85th Legislative Session, the Texas Legislature passed and Governor Abbott signed into law, Senate Bill 1004 (small cellular antennas or nodes). The new lav goes into effect statewide on September 1, 2017. It is also a mandate for cities on the requirements and methodology to allow wireless telecommunication companies to install small cellular nodes on new and existing utility poles within the City's right-of-way. The new law erodes the City's ability to manage its right-of-way by establishing the maximum fees cities can charge, the timing in which permits must be reviewed and approved, and prohibits the ability to deny requests or place moratoriums on additional device installations. According to the cellular industry the nodes are necessary as consumers continue to migrate towards solely using cellular communications in their homes and businesses. To thatend, the need foradditional coverage is necessary due to public demand. This is also a strategy for the telecom industry as it begins to rollout the new 5G technology. Based on the impending timing of the new law, cities across the state are working to establish the requisite ordinances, design m anuals, application form s, and in ternal review processes to be in com pliance by September 1. The following are highlights of the new law: • Mandates that network nodes and their support poles to be installed in the City's right-of-way o Includes the use of existing utility poles, tra ffic signal poles, and the installation of new poles o Restricts the installation of nodes on existing decorative poles o Allows for some restrictions in historic and design districts (i.e. install decorative poles, reasonable design and concealment restrictions) o Sets height at a 55-foot maximum • Establishes permit requirements o Generally required for a node, support pole, and transfer facility o Up to 30 network nodes are allowed per permit o Prohibits cities from issuing permits for routine maintenance, replacing or upgrading the existing node • Establishes time line (shot clock) on City's permit approval process and Telecom's installation o Network node permit request: 30 days for the City to determine completeness; 60 days to approve or deny, and if not acted upon in this timeframe the permit is granted o Node support pole perm it: 30 days for the City to determ ine completeness; 150 days to approve or deny, and if not acted upon in this timeframe the permit is granted o Transfer facility: 10 days for the City to de termine completeness; 21 days to approve or deny, and if not acted upon in this timeframe the permit is granted o If a perm it is denied f or being incomplete the applicant m ay resubmit a com pleted application within 30 days; the City has 90 days to act on resubmitted applications • Establishes the fee structure: Network Nodes: o Application fee: $500 for up to five network nodes, $250 for each addition network node on a permit o Annual node site rental rate: $250 per node site, annual CPI adjustment is allowed Node Support Poles: o Application fee: $1,000 each pole o Annual pole rental rate: $250 per pole site • Defines the restriction of node and pole installations by zoning districts o Municipal parks that meet certain criteria o Residential areas that meet certain criteria o Historical districts that meet certain criteria o Design districts that meet certain criteria • Allows for cities to establish a design manual o The adopted design m anual would establish th e City's design guidelines regarding the aesthetics of the nodes, the support poles, the nodes enclosure, and the camouflaging of the electrical supply Several City departments have been working together over the last several weeks to determine the best course of action. Based on the recommendations of staff a series of ordinances have been drafted to guide the implementation of this new legislation. This includes the fee ordinance, design manual and its enabling ordinance, service pole license agreement, and municipality owned utility license agreement and its enabling ordinance. OPTIONS This new law is an unfunded m andate established by th e Texas Legislature and is set to go into effect September 1, 2017. Unfortunately, there are minimal options available to consider. RECOMMENDATION Consider approval of several ordinance related to SB 1004: • Fee ordinance, • Design manual and its enabling ordinance; • Service pole license agreement; • Municipality owned utility license agreement and its enabling ordinance ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT Not applicable for this item PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW(Council, Boards, Commissions) The information related to SB 1004 has been discussed and reviewed in work session for input with the following City Boards and Commissions: • Planning & Zoning Commission: August 9, 2017 • Public Utility Board: August 14, 2017 • Historical Landmark Committee: August 14, 2017 FISCAL INFORMATION At this early stage of the implementation for Senate Bill 1004 it is difficult to calculate the fiscal impact to the City. The fees are set by the new state law. The revenues generated and expenditures incurred are all contingent on the number of applications made by the cellular provider. BID INFORMATION Not applicable for this item. STRATEGIC PLAN RELATIONSHIP The City of Denton's Strategic Plan is an action-oriented road map that will help the City achieve its vision. The foundation for the plan is the five long-term Ke y Focus Areas (KFA): Organizational Excellence; Public Infrastructure; Econom is Development; Safe, Livable, and Fam ily-Friendly Community; and Sustainability and Environmental Stewardship. While individual items may support multiple KFAs, this specific City Council agenda item contributes most directly to the following KFA and goal: Related Key Focus Area: Public Infrastructure Related Goal: 1.1 Manage financial resources in a responsible manner EXHIBITS 1. Agenda Information Sheet 2. Ordinance & Design manual 3. SB 1004 legislation 4. PowerPoint presentation Respectf ully submitted: Mario Canizares Assistan t City Manager Presentation regarding the Implementation of Senate Bill 1004 (Small Cellular Antennas) Denton City Council August 22, 2017 WRO Topics for Discussion: • Purpose/Background of SB 1004 (small cell) • Highlights of SB 1004 • Key provisions of the law • Implementation Plan Purpose/Background — Senate Bill 1004 • Authored by Senator Hancock in the 851h Legislative Session • Signed by Governor Abbott in early June • Establishes Chapter 284 of the Local Gov't Code • Goes into effect on September 1 , 2017 • Allows the cellular industry to install small antennas/nodes within the City's rights-of-way Purpose/Background — Senate Bill 1004 • Its purpose was to: • Increase cellular network coverage across the state • Update state law regarding new technologies • Meet customer demand • Easier rollout of new SG technology and beyond • Requires compliance by all cities • One size fits all approach • Baseline approval processes, timelines, and fees • Including certain design elements Examples of Small Cell Equipment Radios Antenna HxWxD: 18.1" x 10.5" x 5.5" HxWxD: 7.87" x 7.87" x 3.94" H x Diam: 24.7" x 10" Weight: 22 Ibs Weight: 11 Ibs Weight: 19 Ibs Note:These ore typical examples of small cells. The actual equipment[hot will be installed by AT&T may vary from these. ®2(Il]AT&T Irt[e ectaal Property.All r.ghts rescrvM.ATWT,Glnbe Ingo;Monillz ag YOJr Wo•�d and DIPECTV are.regisM•eA trademarks and sett m marks of AT&T Inte''Muai ProoeM and(or AT&TaffiliMed comoanies.All aMe�•narks are the oronerly of[he•resaective owners.AT&T Prao�etary(Internal Ilse Only(. Purpose/Background — Senate Bill 1004 What does a small cell node look like? !.' ( iul hidr nAT&T f. "Woltz }' trl of T Purpose/Background — Senate Bill 1004 Examples of what a small cell node looks like: r 1 tf Purpose/Background — Senate Bill 1004 Examples of what a small cell node looks like: v. %%4 05"N z • Purpose/Background — Senate Bill 1004 Who - players in this field? AT&T Sprint] - ° elecommunications infrastructure DE T Highlights of SB 1004 Key Provisions of SB 1004; Chapter 284 LGC • Mandates that small cell nodes and poles to be installed in the City's rights-of-way • Includes use of existing utility and traffic poles • Establishes City permit requirements • Establishes time line (shot clock) for City approval • Establishes maximum fee structure the City can charge Highlights of SB 1004 Key Provisions of SB 1004; Chapter 284 LGC Permit shot clock requirements: W IMT mpany files City deadline to review If complete, City's Node (cell/antenna) Day 1 Maximum Of 3o days Maximum of 6o days application for completeness deadline to approve or ny ap Day 31 Day 61 TransportDay 1 Maximum of io days Maximum Of 21 days Day ii Day 22 New Pole Day 1 Maximum Of 3o days Maximum Of 1.5o days Day 31 D. Fee structure: • $500 for up to 5 network nodes; $250 for each additional node • Annual node site rental: $250 per node • $ 1 ,000 for a new pole; $250 annual pole rental 0 Monthly rental: $28 for each network transfer facility WRO Highlights of 1004 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIq -III IIpIIpIII1!I1I 11. 17PIWO jijiipiiijpiiigiiij ��- Initial Vendor Submittal Vendor Obtains Initial Agreements and/or No Y" Vendor Files Other Missing Completeness Application Information Review Full Vendor Revises Completeness Application (90days max) Review (30-days) City Notifies Vendor of No Accept Applicatio Revisions Required (60 to 150-days) Y,' �n Issue Permit DENTON Highlights of SB 1004 Key Provisions of SB 1004; Chapter 284 LGC • Defines zoning restrictions of node and pole installations • Municipal parks • Residential areas • Historical and Design districts • Allows for certain design elements • Maximum size of node; pole height • Allows for enclosures and camouflaging of nodes and support infrastructure Highlights of SB 1004 Key Provisions of SB 1004; Chapter 284 LGC Design elements: Various . , l Ai • City's Implementation Plan • Meetings with cell providers to understand their plans • Drafting new ordinances • Drafting design standards • Drafting license and application forms • Staff attending information sessions at NCTCOG • Receiving/sharing information with other cities City's Implementation Plan • Sent Informal Staff Report to City Council on July 28, 2017 • Presented to: • Planning & Zoning Commission: August 9 • Public Utility Board: August 14 • Historic Landmark Commission: August 14 • Seeking approval of ordinance by City Council: August 22 • Post information on City website: August 23 • Begin receiving applications: September 1 Recommendation That the City Council approve the following ordinances to implement Senate Bill 1004 • Design Manual Ordinance • Fee Ordinance • Service Pole Agreement Ordinance • MOU Pole Attachment Ordinance In Conclusion • SB 1004 goes into effect September 1 , 2017 • Is very favorable to the cellular industry • Requires that cities approve small cell deployments in the city's right-of-way • All cities in Texas are affected • It's one size fits all • This is a work in progress • It directs the processes/methodology/pricing for cities • Provides very limited options for regulating W"I Thank you Any Questions ? Revision Date 3/30/18 Council Re uests for Information Request Request Date Staff Responsible Status 1. Information on cost determination for curb rate vs drop- 6/5/17 Cox An RFP for a cost of service study is off rate at landfill being prepared; the project is expected to last a few months into spring 2018. 2. Survey and report of how other municipalities and 7/25/17 Howell A consultant is working on an school districts fund their School Resource Officers, as efficiency analysis of the Aquatics well as analysis of calls to school and efficiency Center. An MOU for increased SRO funding from DISD is on April 3 agenda. 3. Work session on special events/parades and permitting 1/9/18 Howell/Kuechler A brief update was included in the processes required Friday Jan. 12 report, and a work session is planned for April 10. 4. Identify options for partnership with Parks Foundation 2/20/18 Langley Parks Foundation Board is considering options. 5. Work session on DCTA(discuss City Council goals for 2/20/18 Nelson A work session is tentatively scheduled DCTA) for April 10. 6. Work session on Tree Code 2/20/18 McDonald A work session is tentatively scheduled for April 10. 7. Change ordinances to show Council Member votes 2/20/18 Walters A minor ordinance amendment will be presented at the April 10 work session. The item will then appear on the April 17 consent agenda for consideration. 8. Work session on HOT funds and potential uses (historic 2/27/18 Puente HOT Funds Committee meeting on preservation, public art, cultural district, etc) April 26; scheduled a Council work session after. 9. Work session on small cell infrastructure 3/20/18 Canizares An ISR is provided in the Friday March 30 report. 10. Update on DEC air permit testing 3/20/18 Morrow/Banks An update is provided in the Friday March 30 report. 11. Staff report on gun sales near schools, any zoning 3/20/18 McDonald/Howell/ A report will be provided in the Friday requirements Leal Aril 6 report. 12. Staff report summarizing emergency response plan— 3/20/18 Paulsgrove/Howell An ISR is provided in the Friday how does it work? March 30 report. 13. Request for a city-wide speed limit analysis 3/20/18 Estes/Deshmukh 14. Work session on plan for downtown and homelessness 3/20/18 Kuechler Request Request Date Staff Responsible Status 15. Information on when splash park will open 3/20/18 Behrens An update was provided in the Friday March 23 report. Tentative opening and event date of May 12. 16. Work session on water plan 3/20/18 Banks A work session will be scheduled in later April or May. 17. Request for following items to be included in Joint 3/27/18 Hileman/Kuechler Staff will work with Denton ISD and DISD meeting and have broad postings: Legal to draft a broad agenda for joint 1) Policy discussion of programs with Denton PD luncheon meeting on May 7. 2) DISD's plans for future construction,bonds, land purchases, etc, 3) School safety and SRO program, and 4 DISD Recycling/wastepractices—styrofoam usage 18. ISR on percentage of recyclables sent to China and 3/27/18 Cox/Barnett An ISR is being prepared on this item information on buyers of our rec clables and next two items. 19. Update on recycling options being explored for multi- 3/27/18 Cox/Barnett family properties 20. Report on st rofoam disposal and volumes 3/27/18 Cox/Barnett 21. Inquiry for parking in downtown and potential DATCU 3/27/18 Booth property on Mulberry 22. Work session with a broad posting to discuss Red Light 3/27/18 Deshmukh/Fletcher A work session is tentatively scheduled Camera program, contract, traffic signal management, for April 24. and intersection safety 23. Update on McKinney St project and TxDOT fund 3/27/18 Estes/Nelson An update is provided in the Friday restrictions March 30 report. 24. Update on hiring a Bike & Pedestrian Coordinator 3/27/18 Deshmukh An update is provided in the Friday March 30 report. 25. Include a copy of wastewater/drainage fee ordinance in 3/27/18 Banks Friday report 26. Inquiry on intersection timing at Hickory and Carroll , 3/27/18 Deshmukh An update will be provided in the short for pedestrian crossing? Friday Aril 6 report. 27. Include a printed copy of the new proposed zoning map 3/27/18 McDonald in Friday report 28. DDC - Request for outreach& collaboration with 3/27/18 McDonald residents impacted, including neighborhood planning for a new historic register in CM Briggs' district Cityof Denton City Hall 215 E. McKinney St. Denton,Texas 76201 www.cityofdenton.com DENTON Meeting Agenda City Council Tuesday,April 10,2018 12:00 PM Work Session Room After determining that a quorum is present, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas will convene in a Work Session on Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney Street,Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 1. Citizen Comments on Consent Agenda Items This section of the agenda allows citizens to speak on Consent Agenda Items only. Each speaker will be given a total of three (3) minutes to address any items he/she wishes that are listed on the Consent Agenda. A Request to Speak Card should be completed and returned to the City Secretary before Council considers this item. 3. Work Session Reports A. ID 18-150 Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the City's guidelines for public improvement districts. B. ID 18-275 Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the City of Denton's special event processes, application requirements, common issues, and recommendations for potential solutions. C. ID 18-299 Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the potential sale of the Hwy 77 property and reviewing site options. D. ID 18-532 Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding a policy and application process to review housing tax credit requests. E. ID 18-552 Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the Tree Code policy. F. ID 18-554 Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding future direction for Denton County Transportation Authority. G. ID 18-561 Presentation from staff on consideration of an ordinance amending the Council Rules of Procedure with regards to future ordinances/resolutions (approved or denied) to contain Councilmembers names and how they voted. NOTE: The City Council reserves the right to adjourn into a Closed Meeting on any item on its Open Meeting agenda consistent with Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, or as otherwise allowed by law. Following the completion of the Work Session, the City Council will convene in a Special Called Meeting to consider the following items. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Page I Printed on 313012018 City Council Meeting Agenda April 10,2018 Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. The City Council has received background information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration. Listed below are bids, purchase orders, contracts, and other items to be approved under the Consent Agenda (Agenda Items A — B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. If no items are pulled, Consent Agenda Items A — B below will be approved with one motion. If items are pulled for separate discussion, they may be considered as the first items following approval of the Consent Agenda. A. A17-0006d Conduct the second of two readings and consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton for a voluntary annexation of approximately 0.30 acres of land generally located on the east side of Old Alton Road, south of the intersection of Old Alton Road and Teasley Lane by the City of Denton,Texas. B. ID 18-339 Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Denton and Denton County to construct and install a bike lane on Hercules from Sherman to Locust. 2. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION A. ID 18-559 Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas amending the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget and Annual Program of Services of the City of Denton to allow for increases to: (A) the General Fund of $951,800 for the purpose of funding police facility and park improvement projects, (B) the Park Development Trust Fund of $288,000 for the purpose of funding park property enhancements, and (C) the Capital Improvement Program of $8,263,619 for the purpose of funding drainage, police facility, streets and parks capital projects; declaring a municipal purpose; providing a severability clause; providing an open meetings clause; and providing for an effective date. 3. CONCLUDING ITEMS A. Under Section 551.042 of the Texas Open Meetings Act, respond to inquiries from the City Council or the public with specific factual information or recitation of policy, or accept a proposal to place the matter on the agenda for an upcoming meeting AND Under Section 551.0415 of the Texas Open Meetings Act, provide reports about items of community interest regarding which no action will be taken, to include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; a reminder about an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the municipality; or an announcement involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of the agenda. CERTIFICATE Page 2 Printed on 313012018 City Council Meeting Agenda April 10,2018 I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,on the day of ,2018 at o'clock(a.m.)(p.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 349-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. Page 3 Printed on 313012018 mmmw:� April 2018 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Mursday Friday Saturday 1 2 11:30 am Council 3 4 5 6 7 Luncheon—Cancelled 10:30am Committee on 4 p.m. Public Art 1:30pm Committee on Citizen Engagement Committee the Environment Cancelled 11:30 am CC Work 5:30pm Traffic Safety Session 6:30 pm CC Regular ParkBoard 6pm Session 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 9:00am Public Utilities 10:00 am Audit/Finance 11:00am EDP Board Board Committee 5:00pm P&ZWork Se ssio n 5:30pm HLC 12:00 pm 2nd Tuesday 6:30pm P&ZRegular Session Se ssio n 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2:00 pm CC Work 11:30am Mobility Session Committee 6:30 pm CC Regular HaBSCo Meeting Session 4:00pm Special Called P&ZWork Se ssion 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6:00pm Pub he Utilities 10:00 am Council 5:00pm P&ZWork HOTMeeting Board Airp o n C o mm itte e Session 10:00am 6:30pm P&ZRegular Se ssio n 2:00 pm 4th Tuesday Session 29 30 4:00 p m 7BA 3/30/2018 1:17 PM Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Mursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 2:00 pm CC Work 4 p.m. Public Art Session Committee 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 6 7 9:00a m Public Utilitie s 8 9 10 11 12 Board (revisit the time) 2:00 pm 2nd Tuesday 11:OOam EDP Board 11:30 am Joint Session Counc il/DISD Luncheon Meeting 5:00pm P&ZWork 1:30pm Committee on Session the Environment 6:30pm P&ZRegular 5:30pm Traffic Safety Session Park Board 'IOUR5 pm 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 5:30pm HLC Election Meeting HaBSCo Meeting 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 6:00pm Public Utilities 2:00 pm CC Work 5:00pm P&ZWork Bo a rd Se ssio n Se ssio n 6:30 pm CC Regular 6:30pm P&ZRegular 4:00 pm 7BA Session Session 27 28 29 30 31 Memorial Day - No Council Meeting City Ho lid a y 3/30/2018 1:17 PM 3/28/18 FUTURE CITY COUNCIL ITEMS Note: This is a working draft of pending Council items and is subject to Chan a without notice. Meeting Date Deadlines Item April 2—Luncheon - CANCELLED Captions—March 19 CM—City Council Appointee Reviews Backup—March 30 WS—Tree Fund Policy WS—City Hall Facilities Update April 3 —Work/Regular Session WS—Ethics Ordinance WS—Employee Ethics Policy WS—Continuation of Citizen Report pilot program IC—Vela Park Complex contract 2 items Captions—March 26 WS—Housing Tax Credit Policy and Application April 10 2nd Tuesday Session Backup—April 6 WS— Special Events WS—Amending Council rules -listing of votes on ordinances Captions—April 2 WS—Economic Development mid-year update (City& Chamber) Backup—April 13 WS—Update on DDC (Module 3 Development Standards) WS—Energy Risk Management Policy Update WS—Mayhill Substation Update April 17—Work/Regular Session CA—Ordinance relative to citizen reports CA—Ordinance relative to Council votes listed on ordinances IC—Ethics ordinance adoption IC—Employee Ethics Policy adoption IC—Notice of intent to sell bonds IC—Renewable PPA Captions—April 9 WS—Contract Admin. Audit Backup—April 20 WS—Overview of Compliance Program April 24—4th Tuesday Session WS—Drainage and floodplain discussion WS—Red light cameras WS— Street rehab program Captions—April 16 WS—Comm. Dev. Advisory Cmte. and Human Services Advisory Backup—April 27 Cmte. recommendations CA—RTC representative and alternate representative May 1 Work/Regular Session PH—Reinvestment Zone Fisher59 IC—TAA Fisher59 IC—Chapter 380 Fisher59 IC—Chapter 380 US Cold Storage CA-Consent Agenda IC-Individual Consideration WS-Work Session CM-Closed Meeting PH-Public Hearing Meeting Date Deadlines Item May 7—Luncheon Captions—April 23 Joint Meeting with DISD Backup—May 3 May 8 —2nd Tuesday Session Captions—April 23 Backup—May 4 May 15 —Election Meeting Captions—April 30 Backup—May 11 Installation of CC Members Only May 22—Work/Regular Session Captions—May 7 Backup—May 18 May 29—No Meeting Memorial Day holiday observed- City Offices closed 5/28 June 4—Luncheon Captions—May 21 WS—Department Budget Presentations Backup—May 31 WS—Teen Council update Captions—May 21 WS—Preliminary Budget Discussion June 5 —Work/Regular Session Backup—June 1 WS—Department Budget Presentations IC—Comm. Dev. 2018/19 Action Plan June 12—2nd Tuesday Session Captions—May 25 USCM, Boston, 6/8-6/11 Backup—June 8 WS—Department Budget Presentations June 19—Work/Regular Session Captions—June 4 TCMA, Galveston, 6/21-24 Backup—June 15 WS—Department Budget Presentations June 26—4th Tuesday Session Captions—June 11 WS—Department Budget Presentations Backup—June 22 Jul 2—No Luncheon Jul 3 —No Meeting July 4h holiday observed—City Offices closed July 10—No Meeting Captions—July 2 WS—2nd Preliminary Budget Discussion July 17—Work/Regular Session Backup—July 13 WS—Department Budget Presentations IC—EDP Board nominating committee July 24—4ch Tuesday Session Captions—July 9 WS—Department Budget Presentations Backup July 20 WS—Chamber ED contract July 31 —No Meeting August 2—Budget Workshop Captions—July 16 Backup—July 27 August 6—Luncheon Captions—July 23 WS—Department Budget Presentations Backup—August 2 August 7—Work/Regular Session Captions—July 23 WS—Department Budget Presentations Backup—August 3 WS—Budget Workshop August 14—2nd Tuesday Session Captions—July 30 WS—Budget Workshop Backup—Au ust 10 CA-Consent Agenda IC-Individual Consideration WS-Work Session CM-Closed Meeting PH-Public Hearing Meeting Date Deadlines Item August 21 —Work/Regular Session Captions—August 6 WS—Budget Workshop Backup—August 17 IC—Chamber ED contract August 28 —4th Tuesday Session Captions—August 13 WS—Budget Workshop Backup—August 24 PH— 1 st Public Hearing on the Tax Rate September 3 —No Luncheon Labor Day holiday September 4—No Meeting September I I—Special Called Work/Regular Captions—August 27 WS—Budget Workshop Session Backup— September 7 PH—2nd Public Hearing on the Tax Rate PH—Public Hearing on the Budget September 18 —Work/Regular Session Captions—August 31 WS—Budget Workshop Backup— September 14 IC—Adoption of Budget September 25 —4th Tuesday Session Captions— September 10 Backup— September 21 October 1 —Luncheon Captions— September 17 Backup— September 27 October 2—No Meeting National Night Out October 9—2nd Tuesday Meeting Captions— September 24 TML, Fort Worth, 10/9-10/12 Backup—October 5 October 16—Work/Regular Session Captions—October 1 Backup—October 12 October 23 —4th Tuesday Session Captions—October 8 WS— Stoke annual report Backup—October 19 October 30—No Meeting November 5 —Luncheon Captions—October 22 Backup—November 1 November 6—Work/Regular Session Captions—October 22 NLC, Los Angeles, 11/7-11/10 Backup—November 2 IC Stoke contract renewal November 13 —2nd Tuesday Session Captions—October 29 Backup—November 9 November 20—No Meeting Thanksgiving Holiday observed—City Offices Closed 11/22-23 November 27—4th Tuesday Session Captions—November 12 Backup—November 21 Tentative-Based on Need December 3 —Luncheon Captions—November 19 Backup—November 29 December 4—Work/Regular Session Captions—November 19 Backup—November 30 December 11 —2nd Tuesday Session Captions—November 26 Backup—December 7 CA-Consent Agenda IC-Individual Consideration WS-Work Session CM-Closed Meeting PH-Public Hearing Meeting Date Deadlines Item December 18—Work/Regular Session Captions—December 3 Backup—December 14 Tentative-Based on Need December 25 —No Meeting Christmas Holiday observed—City Offices Closed 12/24-25 CA-Consent Agenda IC-Individual Consideration WS-Work Session CM-Closed Meeting PH-Public Hearing Construction Projects Report IMPROVING CITY OFWeek of Apr 02-08, 2018 r((Co DEN DENTON Proposed Date of Proposed Date Other Department Street/Intersection From To Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: CURRENT PROJECTS See Yellow Highlighted for Major Closures Auburn Dr. Georgetown Bowling Green 2/19/18 4/30/18 Mill/Overlay(Temporary Road Streets 1/31/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Ave.A Maple Eagle 3/19/18 4/30/18 LINT 2018 Residence Hall Project Engineering 940-349-8910 Ave. C Eagle Ave C 2/20/18 3/29/18 Electric Construction Engineering (940)349-8910 Bell St. Bell Prairie 4/5/18 4/6/18 Manhole Installation Wastewater (940)349-7300 (Temporary Lane Closures) g g / / Mill/Overlay(Temporary Road / / g ( ) Belhaven St. Georgetown Bowling Green 2 19 18 4/30/18 Streets 1 31 18 Door Hangers 940 349-7160 Closures Possible) Bonnie Brae St. Multiple Multiple 7/1/17 7/31/19 Street Widening Engineering (940)349-8910 Bonnie Brae St. Hwy 380 Intersection 3/14/18 TBD Commercial Driveway Construction Building (940)349-8360 Inspections Brandywine Cir. Briarwood Dead End 2/20/18 4/9/18 Street Reconstruction (Temporary Streets 2/16/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Lane Closures) Brandywine St. Briarwood Brandywine Cr. 2/20/18 4/9/18 Street Reconstruction (Temporary Streets 2/16/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Lane Closures) Brinker Rd. Medpark Loop 288 2/12/18 4/27/18 Concrete Panel Repairs (Temporary Streets N/A (940)349-7160 Lane Closures Possible) Canterbury Ct. Hollyhill I-35 4/9/18 6/15/18 Drainage Improvements (TemporaryEngineering (940)349-8910 Lane Closures Possible) Proposed Date of Proposed Date Other Department Street/Intersection From To Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Country Home/Eagle Concrete Panel Repairs Clear River Cul V Sac 4/9/18 5/14/18 Streets (940)349-7160 Wing No Detours Egan St. Amarillo Malone 2/5/18 5/7/18 Mill/Overlay (Temporary Road Streets 1/24/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Fordham Ln. Amherst Bowling Green 2/19/18 4/30/18 Mill/Overlay (Temporary Road Streets 2/14/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Hickory St. Bonnie Brae N Texas 1/2/18 5/11/18 Street Reconstruction (Temporary Streets 2/7/18 Door Hangers, (940)349-7160 Lane Closures) Public Meetings Holiday Park Phase 2 Manhattan Kings Row 11/10/17 12/1/18 Wastewater Main Construction Wastewater 11/16/18 Door Hangers (940)349-8489 Holiday Park Phase 2 Yellowstone Sherman 3/6/18 TBD Water Main Construction Water 2/28/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7181 Linden Dr. Malone Ponder 3/19/18 4/27/18 Curb and Gutter Repairs Streets No Door Hangers (940)349-7160 McKinney St. Bolivar Cedar 11/14/17 4/29/18 Parking Lot Reconstruction Engineering 11/2/17 (940)349-8910 Mayhill Rd. US 380 Edwards 9/1/17 2/1/20 Street Reconstruction (Temporary Engineering 1/3/18, Door Hangers (940)349-8910 Road Closures Possible) 1/24/18 Mockingbird Ln. McKinney Paisley 10/23/17 4/6/18 Street Reconstruction (Temporary Streets 10/10/17 Public Meeting, (940)349-7160 Road Closures Possible) Door Hangers Potomac Pkw Shiloh Shenandoah 2 12 18 4 6 18 Street Panel Repair(Temporary Lane Streets 2 6 18 Door Han 940 349-7160 Y' / / / / Closures Possible) / / Hangers ( ) Prominence Pkwy. Ma hill Atlanta 1 31 18 8 31 18 Water and Wastewater Crossing Engineering 1/24/18 (940)349-8910 (Road Closure) Riney Rd. N Elm Solana 9/29/17 7/29/18 Road Removal and Replacement Engineering Yes (940)349-8910 (Road Closure) Proposed Date of Proposed Date Other Department Street/Intersection From To Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Roselawn Bonnie Brae Kansas City 3/26/18 TBD Drainage and Roadway Construction Engineering (940)349-8910 Southern RR (One Lane traffic control) Sagebrush Dr. Multiple Multiple 2/15/18 5/1/18 Wastewater Main Construction Wastewater 2/9/18 Door Hangers (940)349-8489 Sagebrush Dr. Multiple Multiple TBD TBD Streets Construction Streets (940)349-7160 Shady Oaks Dr. Shady Oaks S.Woodrow 3/19/18 4/19/18 Right Turn Lane Installation Streets 2/28/18 (940)349-7160 (Closed 8 P.M. to 6 A.M.) Shiloh Rd. Natchez Trace Shenandoah 3/19/18 4/30/18 Concrete Panel Repairs (Temporary Streets 3/7/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Lane Closures Possible) Spencer Rd. Mayhill Lowe's 4/2/18 9/29/18 Water Line Replacement Water (940)349-7181 Driveway (Road Closure) Spencer Rd. Mayhill Lowe's 4/2/18 9/29/18 Drainage Rebuild Drainage (940)349-8488 Driveway (Road Closure) Lowe's Road Reconstruction Spencer Rd. Mayhill 4/2/18 9/29/18 Streets (940)349-7160 Driveway (Road Closure) Unicorn Lake Blvd. Wind River State School 3/12/18 4/30/18 Concrete Panel Repairs (Temporary Streets 3/7/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Lane Closures Possible) COMPLETED PROJECTS Cornell St. Amherst Tulane 2/19/18 3/30/18 Mill/Overlay(Temporary Road Streets 2/14/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Dartmouth PI. Amherst Cornell 2/26/18 4/13/18 Mill/Overlay (Temporary Road Streets 1/31/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Gayla Dr. Mayhill Bridges 1/4/18 3/9/18 Water and Wastewater Crossing Engineering 1/3/18 Door Hangers (940)349-8910 (Road Closure) Proposed Date of Proposed Date Other Department Street/Intersection From To Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Gober St. Linden Cordell 1/24/18 3/30/18 Mill/Overlay (Temporary Road Streets 1/9/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Grace Temple Ave. Fulton Ponder 2/5/18 3/30/18 Mill/Overlay (Temporary Road Streets 1/31/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Hickory Creek Rd. Teasley Riverpass 3/12/18 3/30/18 Base Failure Repairs Streets N/A (940)349-7160 La Mirada/Zilda Way Manten Ponder 3/12/18 4/2/18 Sidewalk Repairs (Temporary Lane Streets No Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Londonderry Ln. Teasley Westminster 2/1/18 3/9/18 Drainage Improvements (TemporaryDrainage 10/16/17 (940)349-7116 Lane Closures Possible) Lookout Ln. Windsor Westward 1/29/18 3/26/18 Sidewalk Repairs (Temporary Lane Streets No Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Malone St. Auburn Dead End 2/14/18 3/30/18 Mill/Overlay (Temporary Road Streets 1/31/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) Paisley Ln. Frame Ruddell 12/20/17 3/16/18 Water Main Construction Water 11/15/17 Door Hangers (940)349-7181 Windriver Dr. Loon Lake Teasley 1/22/18 3/30/18 Sidewalk Repairs (Temporary Lane Streets HOA (940)349-7160 Closures Possible) 1/11/18 UPCOMING PROJECTS Cape Town Desert Willow Bishop Pine Summer 2018 TBD Street Panel Repair Streets (940)349-7160 (No detours) Fulton St. TBD TBD Water,Wastewater, and Streets Multiple Hettie St. TBD TBD Water,Wastewater, and Streets Multiple Hinkle Dr. TBD TBD Water,Wastewater, Drainage, and Multiple Streets Proposed Date of Proposed Date Other Department Street/Intersection From To Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Londonderry Ln. Teasley Westminster 9/1/18 TBD Street Improvements (Temporary Streets (940)349-7160 Lane Closures Possible) Malone St. Crescent Westminster Summer 2018 Water Main Construction Water (940)349-7181 PEC 4- Engineering In Design Installing Underground Box Culvert Engineering (940)349-8910 Water,Wastewater, Drainage, and Smith-Johnson Summer 2018 Engineering (940)349-8910 Streets Thomas St. TBD TBD Water,Wastewater, and Streets Multiple Welch St. Mulberry Chestnut TBD TBD LINT 2018 CVAD Project Engineering 3/19/18 3/30/2018 (940)349-8910 Wayne St. TBD TBD Water,Wastewater, and Streets Multiple Windsor Dr. TBD TBD Water,Wastewater, Drainage, and Engineering (940)349-8910 Streets