The URL can be used to link to this page

121418 Friday Staff Report `;;F City Manager's Office DENTON 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 • (940) 349-8307 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 14, 2018 TO: The Honorable Mayor Watts and Council Members FROM: Todd Hileman, City Manager SUBJECT: Friday Staff Report I. Council Schedule A. Meetings 1. Canceled - Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting on, Monday, December 17, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Work Session Room. 2. Work Session of the City Council on Tuesday,December 18,2018 at 12:00 p.m. in the City Council Work Session Room followed by a Regular Meeting in the Council Chambers at 6:30 p.m. 3. Agenda Committee Meeting on Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. in the City Manager's Conference Room. B. Upcoming Events 1. State of the City, January 17, 2019 from 6:00-8:30 p.m. at the Embassy Suites Denton Convention Center 2. US Conference of Mayors, January 23-25, 2019, Washington, D.C. 3. Denton County Days, February 18-20, 2019, Austin, TX II. General Information & Status Update A. Updates to Police Non-Emergency — The Police Department has made exciting progress improving the customer experience for non-emergency calls. On Dec. 11, Police migrated from the automated selection list to having live-voice responses available around the clock for non-emergency calls. The goal is to have a customer service representative answer all non-emergency Police calls; during peak hours there may be instances when calls are routed to the automated selection list due to volume. Police will continue to modify processes with the new live- OUR CORE VALUES Integrity • Fiscal Responsibility • Transparency • Outstanding Customer Service answer process to ensure residents are able to notify Police of concerns or issues as quickly as possible. Police is also exploring options for residents to report certain categories of non-emergency public safety concerns through the Engage Denton app. Staff will share additional information about reporting non- emergency issues through Engage Denton over the next few weeks. Staff contact: Bobby Smith, Police B. Crash Data on W.Oak Street—Recently,staff was asked to provide data on vehicle accident information for W. Oak Street. The Police Department pulled data for all accidents occurring on W. Oak Street between Carroll and Bonnie Brae for the period of Dec. 1, 2017, through Nov. 30, 2018. Attached is a detailed table outlining W. Oak Street vehicle accident data.Below is a summary of the findings: • 65 total automobile accidents • 9 crashes involving a vehicle striking a parked vehicle • 1 accident involving a vehicle striking a stationary object • 2 crashes on side streets off of W. Oak involving striking parked vehicles Of the non-intersection crashes, the majority were caused by unsafe lane changes or turning from the wrong lane.None of the accidents reported list speed as a factor. Staff contact: Daryn Briggs, Police C. Disabled Parking — During Concluding Items on Dec. 12, Council Member Hudspeth asked for information related to any special considerations made for parking enforcement of vehicles displaying a disabled parking placard or license plate. The Police Department rarely tows vehicles from private property. Towing on private property is typically authorized by the property owner and any special considerations would need to be determined by the property owner and the towing company. On public property, the Police Department does not typically give special consideration to vehicles displaying disabled placards or disabled license for traffic or parking enforcement. Staff contact: Frank Padgett, Police D. Community Market Banner — At the Dec. 4 Council Meeting, Council Member Briggs requested information on the coordination and pricing for community banners, such as those used to advertise the Denton Community Market. All banners are subject to the sign ordinance, and are printed and paid for by the organization making the request. All documents required are available on the Special Events page of the City's website (https://www.cityofdenton.com/en- us/residents/make-a-difference/plan-an-event). Three options for displaying banners are outlined below: 1) In-Ground o Permit Required(Wind Devices) ■ Permitting fee paid through Building Inspections ■ Valid for 30 days after issuance ■ May apply for three permits per year ■ Note: Wind Devices shall not be placed in the right-of-way or attached to fences, trees, shrubs,utility poles, or street signs 2) Light Pole o Roughly 52 available locations: Surrounding Denton County Courthouse on the Square, along Carroll Blvd., along McKinney St. near the Civic Center, on Oakland St., and on Bell St. near Mingo Rd. ■ The cost to display these are $15/banner for seasonal banners, and $27 per banner for event banners ■ Schedule and coordinate these to be displayed with Denton Municipal Electric (DME)by e-mailing Danielle Stanford at Danielle.Stanford(cr�,cityofdenton.com. 3) Across Locust Street o Permit Required(Wind Device Over Street Application) ■ Permitting fee paid through Building Inspections o Building Inspections checks the schedule to ensure that the dates are available o Banners are then scheduled with DME (Danielle Stanford) to be displayed In 2014, prior to becoming a 501 (c) (3), the Denton Community Market, in partnership with the City of Denton, applied for and received a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. As a part of that grant, the Community Market was able to purchase a number of signs and banners to use during market days. These include: Description Amount Three large feather banners (Farmers District, Pet District, and General Market) $735 Onesponsor banner to hang at gazebo $225 One Farmer's District banner $161.63 60 plastic yard signs and stands $1,830 Total $2,951.63 Staff contact: Stuart Birdseye, Public Affairs E. Challenge to End Veteran Homelessness — On Oct. 25, 2018, Mayor Watts announced that the City of Denton,jointly with the Denton County Homelessness Leadership Team(DCHLT), would be joining a national campaign to end veteran homelessness in our community. The DCHLT adopted the goal to end veteran homelessness by Dec. 31,2020 into its strategic plan. A first community planning meeting with a group of approximately 25 people representing various stakeholders and organizations met this last Monday morning from Sam to noon. The group reviewed community progress to date, reviewed what ending veteran homelessness means, and worked together on an actor mapping exercise to draft a system resource map and identify opportunities. The group plans to meet again in January. Further outreach will be performed in the coming months as we progress in planning and work towards this goal. Staff contact: Sarah Kuechler/Dani Shaw, Community Development F. Wells Fargo Parking Garage— City Council requested information on November 13, 2018 regarding the structural integrity of the previous Wells Fargo parking garage and whether similar concerns exist with the Park 7 parking garage. Staff spoke with architect Mark Martin regarding the Wells Fargo parking garage and Mr. Martin stated that, in speaking with the building's superintendent,the parking garage was torn down in approximately 2010. There was no issue with the structural integrity of the parking garage,but instead the problem was with parking deck surface of the garage being in disrepair. Rather than resurfacing the deck,the owner decided to remove the structure. Any construction of the Park 7 complex will be required to follow the City of Denton Building Code which Development Services staff will review through the permit application process. At this time, the only permit issued for the Park 7 project is for a temporary fence at the site. Staff contact: Scott McDonald, Development Services G. Lake Forest Park Update — The Parks and Recreation Department has continued to improve the condition of the Lake Forest Park pond. Over the past few weeks, staff has trimmed brush on the south side of the spillway to improve flow downstream. Parks Maintenance also contracted to have aquatic vegetation removed/trimmed to improve water flow and aesthetics. Staff contact: Drew Huffinan, Parks and Recreation H. American Legion Hall Senior Center—The permitting process is underway for the redesign of the American Legion Hall Senior Center (ALH) and construction drawings are currently at 95% completion. The project is anticipated to be advertised after the first of the year with a 3-4 week window for contractors to bid on the project. It is anticipated that staff will provide City Council with an update in mid to late March on the bids received along with an updated construction schedule. ALH will remain open for the public to utilize as a recreation center and a daytime warming center. Once the construction schedule is updated and confirmed, the public will be notified of the impending closure and eventual demolition. Facility patrons are and will be encouraged to attend programs at MLK, Jr. Recreation Center and the Denton Senior Center as well as other city recreational facilities during construction. Staff contact: Laura Behrens,Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation I. City Secretary Recruitment— Current City Secretary, Jennifer Walters is retiring after 34 years of service with the City on January 31, 2019. The City Manager's Office has partnered with Strategic Government Resources (SGR), an executive recruiting firm, to facilitate the recruitment and selection process for the new City Secretary. The position was posted on SGR's website on Dec. 14 at: https://www.govemmentresource.com/CurrentSearches. The posting will be shared with several industry listervs and professional organizations. Qualified applicants are encouraged to apply through SGR's website.The attached brochure includes additional details about the City Secretary position. Staff contact: Rachel Wood, CMO J. Developer Meeting Disclosure—On Nov. 13, the City Council adopted resolution 18-1929 (attached) endorsing a policy intended to inform City Council interactions with developers or persons/entities requesting any type of an incentive or special consideration while a matter is on the City Council agenda due to a tie- vote or where a request is subject to a motion for reconsideration.Part of the policy included the optional disclosure of conversations that elected officials have with developers or individuals, groups, or entities regarding pending development or economic development matters. Council Member Hudspeth disclosed a meeting he had on Dec. 11 regarding the proposed Kings Ridge Estates residential development. Meeting details are attached and will be included as exhibits to all future Council action related to the proposed development. Staff contact: Rachel Wood, CMO K. End of Semester Bikeshare Update - The City Council approved a one-year (academic year) bikeshare pilot program in August of 2018. VeoRide bikeshare began operating at UNT at the beginning of the fall semester. VeoRide received their permit in October to operate throughout the city. Currently, 250 bikes are assigned to the UNT campus and up to 100 are permitted throughout the rest of the city (though fewer are currently deployed). Since the pilot's inception, the bikeshare program has had 27,000 trips by more than 3,000 users covering 6,500 miles.The most popular off-campus destinations for bikeshare users are the square and the Walmart shopping center. VeoRide has one full-time and four part-time employees based in Denton. The bikeshare pilot program ordinance is currently set to expire on May 31, 2019. Staff contact: Marc Oliphant, Capital Projects L. File ID Numbers on Presentation Slides - Starting with the Dec. 18 City Council Meeting, all presentation slides will include the Legistar file ID number and the Council meeting date for ease of reference. Staff contact: Rachel Wood, CMO III. Attachments A. City Secretary Recruitment Brochure B. Resolution 18-1929 C. Dec. 11 Developer Meeting Details IV. Informal Staff Reports A. 2018-178 2018 Citizen Survey Results B. 2018-179 2018 Mosquito Season C. 2018-180 Horse-Drawn Carriage and Horseback Riding Permit Information D. 2018-181 Traffic and Roadway Project Technology E. 2018-182 Procedural Requirements for Impact Fee Public Hearing F. 2018-183 Tree Mitigation Fund Uses G. 2018-184 Fourth Quarter Financial Report H. 2018-185 Landfill Permit Expenses I. 2018-186 Fireside Park Development V. Council Information A. Council Meeting Requests for Information B. Other Council Requests for Information C. Council Calendar D. Future Work Session Items E. Street Construction Report 47, v ��nmo�q 2" yj •, '' eta � -��{ �• �{� � t�.a t�:s'�t� fi �1 ; ji 4 , ho LO �Ail. 44 114, • i •q'j��. :`�.. R MIS _ 4 ' j F r�'!,�T't. !S' • �� J... ar a�LOA .A.A- i_ - 2' �:`.'•�Ya� . ...�5!i.fl.,ybd"+�•). �c.,.i'., itil. _:�_ - - CITY SECRETARY IaENTON CITY OF DENTON EXECUTIVE SEARCH PROVIDED BY STRATEGIC GOVERNMENT RESOURCES a i f _ is� HEW— THE JOts UPPUK i UNi i Y The City of Denton is seeking applications for the position of City Secretary. The selected candidate will join an established team of professionals who are recognized as leaders in their fields. THE COMMUNITY Denton, Texas, is a vibrant and growing community with many opportunities, no matter what your interest or passion. It is located in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, one of the fastest growing regions in the nation, and offers ample quality-of-life amenities and professional opportunities. Denton is a unique cultural destination, where a small-city feel pairs with big-city amenities. A blend of history and culture creates a dynamic suburban environment, home to two thriving universities, a vibrant downtown, and a variety of choices in employment, lifestyle, and neighborhoods. Denton is strategically located at the convergence of 1-35E and 1-35W and is the northern tip of the "golden triangle." The current population (est. 136,268) is rapidly growing, which has led to a focused effort to ensure the City's infrastructure is adequate, now and in the future. Additionally, Denton is close to major airports, being only 25 miles from DFW International Airport, 35 miles from Dallas Love Field, and 20 miles north of Alliance Airport, and offers public transportation options (bus and rail) through the Denton Country Transportation Authority. Denton is home to two state universities, the University of North Texas and Texas Woman's University. With a combined enrollment of more than 50,000 students, the universities bring in a variety of cultural, sports, and entertainment amenities to the Denton community. just south of Denton is a campus for North Central Texas College, the oldest continuously operating two-year college in Texas. Denton Independent School District is the primary public education system and serves more than 27,000 students and 17 cities in a 180 square-mile district. Across Denton, there is a pulsating entertainment culture, featuring live performing arts venues, music and film festivals, museums, and historical sites. Additionally, Denton is home to 30 parks, featuring 300 acres of open space, three recreation centers, a water park and community swimming pools, and hike and bike trails throughout the City. Nearby lakes, hiking trails, and state parks also contribute to exciting outdoor recreation opportunities. -©- DENTON,TEXAS:CITY SECRETARY _ - • ., .. 1 NIP A � BSA GOVERNANCE AND ORGANIZATION The City of Denton is governed by the council-manager form of government. The mayor and six council members are the legislative body of the City and the community's decision makers. The Council focuses on community goals, major projects, and long-term considerations such as community growth, land use development, capital improvement plans, and strategic planning. The Council appoints a professional manager to oversee the delivery of public services. The City Manager serves as the Chief Executive Officer for the City, implements the Council policy directives, and ensures City services are provided to the entire community. The City operates under a fiscal year. For FY 2018-19, the City Council adopted an operating and capital budget of $1.18 billion, with funding for 1667.66 full-time equivalent positions. Denton is a full-service city, providing general government services along with multiple utility/enterprise operations such as water, wastewater, electric, solid waste and recycling, drainage, and airport services. The City has adopted a strategic plan and core values, which guide organizational priorities and ensure that the City fulfills its mission and vision. The FY 17-18 Strategic Plan was adopted by the City Council and is organized into five key focus areas: Organizational Excellence; Public Infrastructure; Economic Development; Safe, Livable, Family-Friendly Community; and Sustainable and Environmental Stewardship. The City Manager introduced the Core Values in FY 17-18 and they reflect the principles through which the City and staff operate. The Core Values are transparency, fiscal responsibility, integrity, and outstanding customer service. To learn more about the City of Denton, visit www.cityofdenton.com. 0 DENTON, 0 CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE The City Secretary's Office supports the City Council and City Manager by maintaining and enhancing the records management process, ensuring efficient access to municipal records, conducting elections from start to finish, and providing daily assistance to internal and external stakeholders. The office coordinates and processes all open records requests. The City Secretary serves as the Chief Election Official conducting municipal, special, and bond elections. IDEAL CANDIDATE The ideal candidate will be an approachable municipal professional with an outgoing personality and enthusiasm for municipal government. The candidate should operate with a high degree of integrity, honesty, trust, and openness, and foster an environment of transparency and accountability. The candidate should be an excellent communicator. The ideal candidate will be a good listener who is forward-thinking, broad-minded, and receptive to new ideas, and who encourages an inclusive and collaborative working environment.The candidate should be able to speak effectively in high-pressure situations. Understanding the multifaceted integration between technology and record-keeping systems will be crucial. As such, the candidate must have proficient knowledge of: Q Relevant City, state, and federal laws, Q Texas Open Meeting Act regulations, and policies Q Robert's Rules of Order and Q Rules, regulations, and laws governing Parliamentary Procedure city elections Q Texas Public Information Act Q Development and administration of Q Open Records procedures records retention systems Q Modern office practices and procedures Q State laws regarding records Q Computers and various Q Texas State Library and Archives software programs , c� Commission regulations for records Q Training and supervision of personnel -0- DENTON,TEXAS:CITY SECRETARY 0 t J av: f T s ill!!:iiii!!I IRfdll duN�mf �?.�ST The essential functions of this position include: Q Serves as Chief Election Official conducting Q Coordinates development and incorporation municipal general, special, and bond elections of Citywide document imaging system and in coordination with Denton County associated regulations Q Serves as Records Management Officer Q Establishes and administers indexing, as outlined by the Texas State Library to maintenance, and retrieval of the official include maintaining policies and procedures records of the City and for the City for creation, receipt, storage, retrieval, and Manager's Office/City Secretary's Office; disposition of records and ensuring that all coordinates the document imaging of City departments are in compliance records through the LaserFiche Imaging Q Serves as Public Information Officer System; and supervises the development coordinating and responding to Open and implementation of computer software Records requests in compliance with the databases as needed for LaserFiche Public Information Act, ensuring that all Q Coordinates the appointments and departments are in compliance membership records of all City boards Q Works closely with the City Attorney's and commissions, coordinates application Office to request Attorney General opinions and appointment procedures, and when necessary supervises and assists in the preparation Q Attends all City Council meetings, prepares of a Board and Commission notebook for official minutes of the proceedings, and annual appointments supervises setup of the meetings 0 Performs research work and prepares statistical and narrative reports Q Directs the preparation and development � Administers the City Secretary's Office, of the City Council agendas and compiles and organizes information and materials provides support and assistance to the Mayor necessary for the City Council agenda packets and City Council and City Manager's Office, and supervises support staff for the City Q Coordinates the preparation of legal Secretary's Office documents, executes required forms and notices, and directs the official publication of 0 Provides input on budget recommendations notices and legal documents —©— DENTON,TEXAS:CITY SECRETARY QUALIFYING EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE The position requires broad knowledge and experience in public records management, municipal elections, and relevant open meeting and public information laws, processes, and procedures. Successful candidates should have a bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework in public administration, business administration, political science, - law, or a closely related field. The candidate should also have a minimum of six years of experience in an administrative office position (with one-year of experience being in municipal public relations), which included frequent public contact, w making discretionary decisions, handling highly confidential matters, and completing complex secretarial duties. Any combination of related education, experience, certifications, or licenses that will result in a candidate successfully performing the essential functions of the job will also be considered. Preferences: Q Master's degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework in Public Administration or Business Administration, or a Doctorate of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctorate with local government experience Q Certification in the Texas Municipal Clerks Certification program 0 Significant familiarity with Granicus/Legistar agenda '. management system 0 Bilingual in Spanish and English COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS oeTA Attain Station The expected hiring range for the position is in the low $100K, depending on the experience and qualifications of the successful candidate. A superior benefits package is also offered, including relocation assistance; Texas Municipal Retirement System at the seven percent employee contribution level with a two-to-one match by the City upon retirement; medical, dental, vision, life, and disability insurance; vacation and sick leave; holidays; and other highly competitive benefits. -0- DENTON,TEXAS:CITY SECRETARY ti Fashioned '•r E I ill APPLICATION PROCESS Please apply online at: http://bit.ly/SGRCurrentSearches For more information on this position contact: Ron Holifield, CEO Strategic Government Resources Ron@GovernmentResource.com SGR 214-676-1691 Or: 410 Kristin Navarro, Director of Business Development and Recruitment Strategic Government Resources Kristinnavarro@governmentresource.com 817-637-3243 This position is open until filled. To view the status of this position, please visit: http://bit.ly/SGRCurrentSearches The City of Denton is an Equal Opportunity Employer and values diversity in its workforce. Applicants selected as finalists for this position will be subject to a comprehensive background check. RESOURCES City of • • Chamber of Commerce . • Convention &Visitors Bureau www.discoverdenton.com RESOLUTION NO. 18-1929 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY INFORMING CITY COUNCIL INTERACTIONS WITH DEVELOPERS OR PERSONS/ENTITIES REQUESTING ANY TYPE OF AN INCENTIVE OR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION WHILE A MATTER IS ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DUE TO A TIE-VOTE OR WHERE A REQUEST IS SUBJECT TO A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt a policy governing their individual interactions with members of the development community and/or individuals, groups, or entities requesting any type of incentive or special consideration to promote transparency in the decision making process; and WHEREAS, members of the City Council agree not to meet with developers or persons/entities requesting incentives or special consideration while a matter is on the City Council agenda due to a tie-vote or where a request is subject to a motion for reconsideration. WHEREAS, the City Council agrees that the requirements set forth in the City policy entitled "City Council Developer and Economic Development Engagement Policy," attached hereto;NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1. The City's policy entitled "City Council Developer and Economic Development Engagement Policy," attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of Denton. SECTION 3. The attached policy shall be filed in the official records with the City Secretary. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. The motion to approve this resolution was made by /v Al Al- m/i/ and seconded by the resolution was passed and approved by ......................the following vote -—0 Aye Nay Abstain Absent Mayor, Chris Watts: Gerard Hudspeth,District 1: ............ Keely G.Briggs, District 2: .............................................. Don Duff, District 3: John Ryan,District 4: Deb An-nintor,At Large Place 5: ...................V/ Paul Meltzer,At Large Place 6: ................................................ �. PASSED AND APPROVED this the JG day of r2018. cy ATTS, Y( ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: <'-Amwe APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: AARON LEAL, CITY ATTORNEY Page 2 CITY OF DENTON ijr �� CITY COUNCIL DEVELOPER AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENGAGEMENT POLICY DENTON Policy Statement: The City Council desires to ensure transparency related to pending or approved development and economic development matters. While a development or economic development matter is on the City Council agenda due to a tie-vote or is subject to a motion for reconsideration, members of the City Council will not communicate outside of a public meeting with developers or persons/entities regarding any type of incentive or special consideration related to the development or economic development matter. To further promote transparency, each City Council member has the option to disclose to the City Manager conversations they have had with developers or with individuals, groups or entities regarding any pending development or economic development case that will require formal Council action.The City Manager will ensure all disclosed conversations are filed accordingly and are attached to associated City Council agenda items. Approved: Resolution_ _ on 2018 Meeting Details Date: December 11, 2018 Time: 12:40 p.m.—1:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chamber Attendees: Council Member, Gerard Hudspeth Jack Dawson, Executive Vice President of Centurion America Roy Magno Subject: Proposed Kings Ridge Estates t — S02.4748"E �48.39' S 89.59'56"E 2715.31_ -- -- �G,/ tw 17 A._ v w =— µ� N86.32'27"E t! O w " " w ___. 39.87' t s1 . 33 .J2 ]7 .]0 .29 . 2e x7 2e .2s 24 2] xo 1° b1e f;n 1e '>j u t 13 I� 12 g 1It per• p a p e_ p 7 p e 5 ! 4 Q 3 + f E SO .40 .4e .47 .4e • 45 .44 .4J 42 41 •40 39 ,Je 37 ,3e 35 , ]4 22 21 S_ U b O wt _� 1'•l __ __ __ — __ __ __ __ ___ — __ __ __ ___ __ __ __ __ ___14t1 _ ,a w ...• - . 2 STREET N tes'R.ar.t 1 I( tas'a.o.w.t --•, ' • . . 1J . 14 • IS • IS 17 •is • 19 • 20 21 .22 •21 w 3 1 I A 7 R 32 10 29 1 1 M p n A A R � i I © ■ � 1�S °O j 10 , e n 1 ! 33 2e f-` t S g 7 • s ,`sJ I 1 N 9 'o� • A s 1x '. 34 ,©x7 �1 = 4 ] 2 8 'ey �� I L1A STREET E +�'w.ar.7 +D T 100 200 BI, A •x AO tyIn,�I � e A u— • A A — w eJ / IYfi: - 'orw •—w A!it�A— Y4 1—! SCALE: 1-1•100' J 25 to a 4 F w 7 Je STREET L 1BB'Ro.W.1 12S 17 N A 20 14 13 37 24 u A I ' e 1; 3e A 23 tF 21 R 1e ! A+p u AQ12 9 B OjB g a . 7 a s • x t w ! ! _ Is J! I22 4 `, u-- yl 39 22 21 1 i STREET 0 1as'a.°.w.t Q 4 s _ A 10 A Y STREET D (•aaw.)IF UP 20 If2 - 1{ xe A :P.L w —� I 44 .43 •42 •41 40► �\ % t I re 10 O upRANAo[[AST p O IR 27 I A 10 " v 13 +* is • w n 'te 0 ` OE"SPAM 4.B]AC. O t I i sA' mR O31 2 28 ne Me • .UiJJ N -�PUBUC ROAD - yy w w LIN e' *044• A 3.2 3 k R !A rw 7 — 4 3 2 21 w iN89.40'57"W 855.1P 11E STREET J Cos.R.O.W.1 24 v io STREET B talrmw.1 d 7 ! a 1 sA ^ 4 Al 34 0 23 iJ 'I A� 21 4 TR. 13 x G� 32.26'09" QH L— 566.11 , 4 A 1 It 112 u u n to is Cr 558.58' 2 ¢ 6� 3e 21 >z 8: N73.27'53.w 37 20 re 6 5 ' •3 1Dme R 39 �'L�• \ �1 S /1• 9 g D=41656D51 rya. STREET A tas•Ra w.t n `t 'A 1 15 14 u^•1z n D • 9 a Fi - (50'_R_O.1P.} A I 7• \ u QA w B R B 1 s \ 4 LOT 40 BLOCK A •4 \ OPDI SPACE • •1 L97 AC. 3 ' x ; p •2 p 4 ZONING REGULATIONS �� ' `�! I— 1 i j 42 410 W PAItC'6LA Single Fatnl R4wldential LEGEND L -- itN B.L.-etJLDtac LINE •Iv+. :l��- P nt R.O.W.-RIGHT OF WAY_ H.O.A.-HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION r • , — 1 ,.t•ti. nett.. — N89.1T8 RINEY ROAD l.Y4'qll�..•� iwini 1.ti •.•sr•PHASE LINNAME171.04' w..nr I t k ls.y 0 STREET NE CHANGE p- 32.03'03'R= 100049 E �t ormn Yud+.aw wl- +7 .asn1 L +t 8- N73.16'20'w 41ur,uftl. L M•W,.1 lal.a 4.w•n INr T•�J Y.Arf Inlet , , ,.p•y p.,y .RWI,•lip" NI. ;�•-,. NOTES DETAILED PLAN t ON THE COLLECTOR ROADS,ELECTRICAL FACILITIES St1ALL K uoERONOUw. TOTAL LOTS 287 OWNER OF 2.ALL Loft 11100m4o NIT1114100 STRIMS WILL BE Eour Tv V,N.,�(A s• TOTAL ACRES 77.685 MM WESTGATE,LLC. KINGS RIDGE ESTATES LOCATION MAP SIDEWALK WHICH SHALL eE CONSTINICTEO BY TW IIIAIEA Al TW IAE N.T.S. OT th a CMSTRUCTRAI ON FACH LOT TOTAL OPEN 1800 VALLEY VIEW LANE,SUITE 300 3.smALKs REOURLn ON ALL FrRFxT FRONTAOEs SPACE ACRES 13.38 FARMERS BRANCH,TEXAS 75234 OUT OF THE PROP DENSITY 3.6 PREPARED BY N. WADE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.1407 4.LANDscArwc ANDspnAOE sttN.L eE INAccoROANa WITH THE CITY o111XruNcis. CORWIN ENGINEERING,INC. �N THE S.NO VERTICAL STRUCTURESw1u.BE BOLT wntE,l THE OAS OATt@IaJC LINE EASEIazNTs� 200 W.BELMONT,SUITE E CITY OF DENTON QLEN,TExAs DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS OCTOBER 2018 SCALE:1"-100' WOOD FENCE BY BUILUM CREEK I DEcA vowD TRCE MASK &RANITC 1 TRAIL I y � ohm 1 I i- 1 ` � I WOOD PENCE ! BY BUILDER i I O I I I OPEN SPACE TO BE PLANTED W/ ! �- ORNAMENTAL 1•-4•TES — ORNAMENTAL METAL FENCC BY I BMETAL UILDER FENCE BY BUILDER ORNAMENTAL METAL PENCE BY I I I I - I _ 1 .�4 I NATIVE i DECOMPOSED f� •, &RANITE ! 1 - TRAIL I ` )NATIVE SEEDORNAME ! i 1 -- — — — 9.TY1. ERMS__ — C"NfiL PENGE BY STREET LANDSCAPE RY] BERMS 1 SECOND N \ ORNAMENTAL I 1 1 DERM/DA 6RA99 — \ ` METAL R."NGE BY BUILDER. I I I NATIVE B.T19. Loop_eL - BERMS j I I I 1 u 1 j SECONDARY ; ORNAMENTAL I p s. ... •-,LL y .M .. SION METAL FENCE BY lr BUILDL"R _ 1 1 LOCATION MAP I \ I Alai TOY A E \\ I EXHIBIT 'A' 1 \ ' KINGS RIDGE ESTATES BUMS I NCONCEPTUAL SITE AND lop LANDSCAPE PLANK I - BERMUDA&BASS �l l 1 � �(� xr B.TrI. I)i�J' _ I Srvdi.I]r.,1gn GI.p.Pt IX. •I -10 N'.SLin Vlmi I r4.M[,h—[NIII N, Wit NORTH - ".1.'� .�.r..s -�Ir 100 SO O 100 9�UAN, f ►'-- NOTE: I"• 100'-O" • • ALL Bar is one Inch on onylwl �'�. ryly THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL L I N drs mg II'nol one inch on lhis 7l r w - THIS PLAN ARE CUNCGPTl1AL.IN NATURE&SUBJECT TO CI IANGC sI-1,udjum salt n na ,3 POND EDGE WITH PLANTING DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL BERM WITH NATIVE PLANTS hlch 50(ptWtW I2,2018 Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-178 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Provide an overview of the results of the 2018 Citizen Survey results BACKGROUND: The City of Denton worked with The National Citizen Survey(NCS),administered by the National Research Center,Inc. (NRC),to survey and assess the opinions of Denton Residents.The questions are designed to measure eight facets of community livability: Safety, Mobility, Natural Environment,Built Environment,Economy,Recreation and Wellness,Education and Enrichment, and Community Engagement. The survey was mailed out to 1,600 randomly selected households in mid-August 2018 and the City made a web-based survey available during late September and early October 2018. The City Council Committee on Citizen Engagement received a presentation from the National Research Center at the December 4, 2018 meeting. This included an overview of the survey methodology, highlights of the survey results, and a brief question and answer session. For reference, the presentation has been included as Attachment 1. Survey Method The best survey research practices were used to ensure that the results from the survey respondents reflect the opinions of residents in the entire community. Surveys were administered in two ways: 1. Mailed Survey (Random, Scientific Sample) — All households within the City of Denton were eligible to participate in the survey. NRC applied a systematic sampling method to the list of households to select 1,600 survey recipients. NRC used the following best practices: • Using a mail-out/mail-back methodology, which typically gets a higher response rate than phone for the same dollars spent.A higher response rate lessens the worry that those who did not respond are different than those who did respond. • Selecting households at random within the community to receive the survey to ensure that the households selected to receive the survey are representative of the larger community. • Over-sampling multi-family housing units to improve response from hard-to-reach, lower income or younger apartment dwellers. • Selecting the respondent within the household using an unbiased sampling procedure; in this case, the "birthday method." The cover letter included an instruction requesting that the respondent in the household be the adult (18 years old or older)who most recently had a birthday, irrespective of year of birth. • Contacting potential respondents three times to encourage response from people who may have different opinions or habits than those who would respond with only a single prompt. • Inviting response in a compelling manner(using appropriate letterhead/logos and a signature of a visible leader)to appeal to recipients' sense of civic responsibility. Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-178 • Providing a pre-addressed,postage-paid return envelope. • Offering the survey in Spanish or other language when requested by a given community. • Weighting the results to reflect the demographics of the population. The results are weighted according to the demographics of survey respondents compared to the 2010 Census and American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Denton. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were housing tenure (rent or own), race, ethnicity, sex, age, and City Council District. • A full explanation of the survey methodology is included in the Technical Appendices that can be found on the Citizen Survey webp ge. 2. Online Survey (Opt-In Sample) — In addition to the scientific, random selection of households, a link to an online "opt-in" survey was publicized and posted to the City of Denton website and shared on social media. The opt-in survey was identical to the mailed survey and open to all Denton residents. Survey Results and Reporting In total, 1,177 survey responses were gathered. 216 people completed the mailed survey, giving a 7%margin of error,and another 961 surveys were received online. This compares to 1,329(mailed and online)total survey responses in 2018, and 268 (mailing only) responses in 2015. After the data from both the mailed and opt-in online survey were collected, NRC compared the data to determine whether it was appropriate to combine,or blend,both datasets together. Because the characteristics of respondents to the opt-in online survey were notably dissimilar in both respondent trait and opinion, the datasets were not blended for NRC analysis and reporting to maintain the representative sample. However,both datasets are useful and insightful. The random,scientific sample through the mailed survey is developed to reflect the perceptions of the overall community. The reports analyzed and compiled by NRC use this dataset as the primary data point. The opt-in online survey had a significant number of responses from our community and provides valuable data as well. The opt- in online survey conveys the perception for individuals that have high levels of community engagement based upon their responses. The best comparison of the two datasets can be viewed in the Trend Over Times report (Attachment 2). DISCUSSION The Community Livability Report (Attachment 3) provides a narrative of the results of the scientific survey. The NRC drew four primary conclusions from the survey results which are outlined on pg. 13 of the Community Livability report and shown below: • Denton residents continue to enjoy a high quality of life. About 8 in 10 residents gave positive ratings to the overall quality of life in Denton and the city as a place to live. At least three-quarters of residents also were pleased with the overall image and overall appearance of the city, their neighborhood as a place to live and the city as a place to raise Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-178 children, and 6 in 10 felt Denton as a place to retire was excellent or good. While most of these evaluations were stable from 2017 to 2018, the rating for overall appearance increased. Residents remain loyal to the community, with more than 7 in 10 residents planning to remain in Denton for the next five years and 9 in 10 recommending living in Denton to someone who asked. These ratings all were similar to those given in other communities across the nation. • Safety ratings are strong and safety is a priority for the community. Denton residents indicated that Safety was an important focus area for the City and ratings within this facet tended to be positive. Nine in 10 residents reported feeling safe in their neighborhood and in Denton's downtown and gave excellent or good ratings to fire and ambulance/EMS services. At least 7 in 10 residents gave favorable marks to police services, fire prevention, animal control and emergency preparedness; these ratings were all similar to the national average.However,only 22%of respondents had stocked supplies for an emergency,a level which decreased from 2015 to 2018 and was lower than levels reported in other communities. • Economy is an important area of focus for the City. Residents indicated that Economy would be an important area for the City to focus on in the next two years and ratings within this facet tended to be positive.Nearly 8 in 10 residents were pleased with Denton's vibrant downtown/commercial area and the overall quality of business and service establishments (both of which were higher than the benchmark), and other Economy-related items such as the overall economic health of the city, shopping and employment opportunities and Denton as a place to visit and to work received ratings similar to those given in other communities across the nation. Denton residents were more likely to work within the city than those who lived elsewhere. • Mobility is also a resident priority. Residents also indicated that they would like to see the City address aspects of Mobility in the coming years. When evaluating ratings within this facet,there were some bright spots: at least half of residents gave positive marks to the overall ease of travel,paths and walking trails, ease of walking and ease of travel by public transportation (which was higher than the national benchmark and an improvement since the previous survey iteration). Further, the ratings for bus or transit services was higher than average, and resident sentiment toward traffic flow, ease of travel by bicycle and by walking, and paths and walking trails improved from 2017 to 2018. However, ratings for the ease of travel by car,public parking,traffic flow, street repair, snow removal and traffic signal timing were lower than the national benchmark comparisons. Moving Forward City staff will use the results from this survey to understand the perception of Denton residents, and to find areas that need improvement whether through increased outreach and education, or through operational enhancements. Staff plans to review the survey results with all departments and develop next steps and an action plan to improve community ratings, as well as integrate into the City's annual strategic plan. The survey results have been posted on the City of Denton's website with previous survey results for citizens to view at https://www.ciiyofdenton.com/en-us/government/strategic- initiatives/planning-and-citizen-survey, and is featured on the Quick Links section of the Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-178 homepage. In addition to the attachments that are included in this report, the website also includes additional reports including: • The NCS Dashboard • The NCS Geographic Crosstabs • The NCS Demographic Crosstabs • The NCS Supplemental Online Results • The NCS Technical Appendices ATTACHMENTS 1. The NCS Presentation Denton 2. The NCS Trends over Time-Denton 2018 3. The NCS Community Livability Report Denton 2018 STAFF CONTACT: Sarah Kuechler Director of Public Affairs (940) 349-8356 sarah.kuechlergcityofdenton.c om Stuart Birdseye Management Analyst (940) 349-8009 stuart.birdseyekcityofdenton.com 11/26/2018 Denton,THENCS' The National Citizen Surve Y Key Findings 2018 NRC The NCS is presented by NRC in ICMA Collaboration With ICMA Leaders of the Core of Better Communities "Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody." Jane Jacobs,The Death and Life ofGreatAmerican Cities 1 11/26/2018 About The NCS • Community Livability Residents • Community Characteristics • GovernancePrivate '�i Communities community- partnerships based • Participationsector among... organizations ment Facets of Community Livability Safety Mobility Economy Recreation and Wellness Quality of Community Overall Natural Built Education Community Environment Environment and Engagement Enrichment 2 11/26/2018 The NCS & Denton - Participant in The NCS in 2015 and 2018 • Scientific sample of 1,60o households • 216 returned surveys; 18% response rate • f7% margin of error .. Spanish In-person - - translation presentation National Benchmark Comparisons ,tt .,. . b 06) 060 • • 0a ^ ed• J 3 11/26/2018 2018 National Benchmark Comparisons 102 9 received received ratings k... lower ratings 2018 Ratings Compared to 2017 All92receivedsimilar 1 received ratings lower ratings 4 11/26/2018 Legend� KeyFocus Areas Higher than national benchmark 0 Similar to national benchmark Lower than national benchmark Most important Built Education / Safe Environment and Enrichment Natural Recreation Environment and Wellness Isr Economy Community Engagement 7 Key Finding LZ �A Denton residents continue to enjoy a kGquah-ty of life 9 5 J� r ALiving in Denton Excellent or good image Overall appearance RemainAff 1 11/26/2018 iKy r"Finding Safetq ratings s are strong and Safety is a for the priorry community 9 in 10 Excellent or good ratings to fire and -ambulance/EMS services Feel safe in their neighborkood Feel safe in Denton's downtown 11/26/2018 Legend Safety Ratings 0 Similar to national benchmark Lower than national benchmark Police Animal control Fire prevention ® Top importance Stocked supplies for an 22% Percent excellent or good emergency 7 Key Finding L #3 2 ��' Economy is an important area of focus for the City 8 11/26/2018 �u Economy ratings Vibrant 4o w n vo wnl commercial area Overall quality of • j8in10 Wtd service establ iskments Rated excellent or good Higher than the national benchmark Economy ratings Denton as a place to work 4 overall economic health of the city ➢Denton as a place to visit 41P ➢Shopping opportunities Economic development excellent or good , r increase since previous survey 9 11/26/2018 7 Ke Key mobitity is also a resident priority Mobility ratings • Overall ease of Excellent or good 'ENTON travel • Ease of walking t toa • Traffic enforcement • Bus or transit fit- services Higher than benchmark It increase since previous survey 10 11/26/2018 Mobility Ratings Paths and walking trails 4 Snow removal (45%) fu (53%) Travel by car (44%) Street cleaning (48%) Traffic signal timing (33%) o Travel by bicycle (47%) 4 c(o o Public parking (32%) 1 +' Street lighting (45%) 3 a Traffic flow (26%) t D E Sidewalk maintenance 19%air Street re Cr in (40/o) p ( ) n a, t =increase since previous survey Special Topics 11 City Communications Relevance of topics in Resident Update IN 11 GO 65% Quality of City website Availability of information about City programs Quality of Cit}�s cable channel ® Usefulness of Citizen Connection Rated excellent or g••• 9/ 10 7/10 5/10 • Denton-Record • City email • City website Chronicle • City Facebook or • Word of • CodeRed Twitter mouth • Citizen • Other local news Connection source • Resident • City staff Update • Public meetings • Public buildings • City council 11/26/2018 Customer Service Preferred Interaction In person .' Telephone Email •' Internet app ' Mail Customer Service Performance j!!8ini0 '71ni0 "Ilk • Timely resolution of request • Courtesy and helpfulness of Ease of locating contact staff information • Knowledge of staff Availability of staff 13 11/26/2018 Voter Participation 0 Not aware of election Voted in last election C�) Not registered to vote ■Yes Voti ocation No n nient Conclusions Denton residents co to enjoy a high quality of life. l� Safety ratings are strong and Safety is a priority for the community. Economy is -.im = tant a cus for t II :. . �I �III I11 1 14 11/26/2018 Moving Forward The Decision making Decision making Envision, Engage, Educate, Earmark, Enact, Evaluate Questions? 15 11/26/2018 THENCS' Thank • The National Citizen Survey" National Research Center,Inc. 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 Boulder,CO 80301 303-444-7863•me@n-r-c.com www.n-r-c.com NRC 16 THE NCTM S The National Citizen SurveyTM Denton, TX Trends over Time 2018 NRC ICMA National Research Center Inc Leaders at the Core of Better Communities 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863 icma.org • 800-745-8780 Summary The National Citizen Survey"(The NCS")is a collaborative effort between National Research Center,Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association(ICMA).The survey and its administration are standardized to assure high quality research methods and directly comparable results across The NCS communities.The NCS captures residents'opinions within the three pillars of a community(Community Characteristics,Governance and Participation)across eight central facets of community(Safety,Mobility,Natural Environment,Built Environment,Economy,Recreation and Wellness,Education and Enrichment and Community Engagement).This report discusses trends over time,comparing the 2018 ratings for the City of Denton to its previous survey results in 2015 and 2017.Additional reports and technical appendices are available under separate cover. Trend data for Denton represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines.Deviations from stable trends over time,especially,represent opportunities for understanding how local policies,programs or public information may have affected residents'opinions. Meaningful differences between survey years have been noted within the following tables as being"higher"or "lower"if the differences are greater than nine percentage points between the 2017 and 2018 surveys,otherwise the comparisons between 2017 and 2018 are noted as being"similar."Additionally,benchmark comparisons for all survey years are presented for reference.Changes in the benchmark comparison over time can be impacted by various trends,including varying survey cycles for the individual communities that comprise the benchmarks, regional and national economic or other events,as well as emerging survey methodologies. It is important to note that in 2017,survey data were collected by a survey research firm other than NRC and data collection methods differed from those used in 2015 and 2018.In 2017,survey responses were collected online only and results were not weighted to population demographics;in 2015 and 2018,survey results were collected from a random sample of residents who received the survey in the mail and results were weighted to reflect the demographics of Denton as a whole.While all survey modes were self-administered,because the 2017 results were not weighted to reflect the entire adult(18 or older)population in Denton,any differences between the 2017 data and other survey years should be interpreted cautiously. In some cases,questions that were asked in 2015 and 2018 were not included on the 2017 survey.In these cases (denoted with an asterisk in the tables below),trend data have been provided by comparing Denton's 2018 data to its 2015 data.Results from the 2018 community-wide open-participation online survey have also been included in the tables below in a separate column.These results have not been weighted to the demographics of Denton. Overall,ratings in Denton for 2018 generally remained stable.Of the 134 items for which comparisons were available,92 items were rated similarly in 2018 and the previous year,17 items showed a decrease in ratings and 25 showed an increase in ratings.Notable trends over time included the following: • Ratings improved for several aspects of Mobility,including traffic flow on major streets,ease of walking and ease of travel by public transportation,among others. • Within Community Engagement,ratings for several measures of government performance increased, including the overall direction of the City,the job City government does at welcoming citizen involvement and overall confidence in City government.Residents in 2018 also gave more positive ratings to opportunities to participate in community matters and the openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds. • Residents were more pleased with aspects of Built Environment in 2018 than previously,including overall quality of new development;variety of housing options; and land use,planning and zoning. • Levels of Participation for many activities declined in 2018 when compared to 2017.Some of these activities included using Denton recreation centers or public libraries,visiting a City park,attending a City-sponsored event,attending or watching local public meetings and volunteering,among others.However,it is important to note that the change in survey methods from 2017 to 2018 has likely impacted some of these ratings changes;therefore,these declines should be interpreted with caution. 1 The National Citizen SurveyT'" Table 1: Community Characteristics General Percent rating positively(e.g.,excellent/good) Comparison to benchmark 2015 2017 2018 2018 opt-in rating** 2018 rating compared to previous year 2015 2017 2018 Overall quality of life 85% 80% 83% 78% Similar Similar Similar Similar Overall image 76% 76% 76% 73% Similar Similar Similar Similar Place to live 89% 86% 86% 83% Similar Similar Similar Similar Neighborhood 77% 82% 81% 80% Similar Similar Similar Similar Place to raise children 81% 80% 79% 77% Similar Similar Similar Similar Place to retire 69% 64% 58% 59% Similar Similar Similar Similar Overall appearance 67% 66% 75% 60% Higher Similar Similar Similar **results not weighted Table 2: Community Characteristics by Facet Percent rating positively(e.g.,excellent/good, very/somewhat safe) Comparison to benchmark 2018 opt-in 2018 rating compared to 2015 2017 2018 rating** previous year* 2015 2017 2018 _ Overall feeling of safety 80% 78% 77% 73% Similar Similar Similar Similar _ Safe in neighborhood 93% NA 94% 90% Similar* Similar NA Similar Safety Safe downtown/commercial area 92% NA 88% 89% Similar* Similar NA Similar Overall ease of travel 58% 53% 59% 44% Similar Lower Lower Similar Paths and walking trails 47% 40% 53% 35% Higher Similar Lower Similar Ease of walking 52% 41% 63% 39% Higher Similar Lower Similar Travel by bicycle 41% 32% 47% 26% Higher Similar Lower Similar Travel by public transportation 44% 26% 51% 21% Higher Similar Similar Higher Travel by car 45% 36% 44% 41% Similar Lower Lower Lower Public parking 34% 24% 32% 21% Similar Lower Lower Lower Much Mobility Traffic flow 27% 15% 26% 28% Higher Lower lower Lower Overall natural environment 71% 62% 62% 55% Similar Similar Lower Lower Cleanliness 67% 59% 64% 54% Similar Similar Lower Similar Much Natural Environment Air quality 56% 34% 71% 39% Higher Lower lower Similar Overall built environment 67% 53% 59% 41% Similar Similar Similar Similar New development in Denton 68% 58% 72% 60% Higher Similar Similar Higher Affordable quality housing 48% NA 43% 25% Similar* Similar NA Similar Housing options 69% 46% 61% 43% Higher Similar Similar Similar Built Environment Public places 72% 76% 73% 71% Similar Similar Similar Similar Overall economic health 73% 64% 68% 66% Similar Similar Similar Similar Much Much Much Economy Vibrant downtown/commercial area 78% 81% 78% 80% Similar higher higher higher 2 The National Citizen SurveyT'" Percent rating positively(e.g.,excellent/good, very/somewhat safe) Comparison to benchmark 2018 opt-in 2018 rating compared to rating** previous year* 2015 2017 2018 Business and services 74% 72% 78% 78% Similar Similar Similar Higher Cost of living 60% 49% 48% 51% Similar Similar Similar Similar Shopping opportunities 62% 59% 63% 63% Similar Similar Similar Similar Employment opportunities 48% 40% 55% 50% Higher Similar Similar Similar Place to visit 72% 73% 65% 71% Similar Similar Similar Similar Place to work 70% 62% 71% 61% Higher Similar Similar Similar Health and wellness 72% 67% 67% 65% Similar Similar Similar Similar Mental health care 58% 40% 64% 40% Higher Similar Similar Higher Preventive health services 72% 63% 70% 66% Similar Similar Similar Similar Health care 73% 62% 66% 61% Similar Similar Similar Similar Food 81% 78% 81% 76% Similar Higher Similar Higher Recreation and Recreational opportunities 74% 67% 75% 67% Similar Similar Similar Similar Wellness Fitness opportunities 76% 68% 72% 66% Similar Similar Similar Similar Education and enrichment opportunities 89% 83% 87% 83% Similar Higher Similar Higher Religious or spiritual events and activities 83% 85% 91% 90% Similar Similar Similar Higher Much Much Much Cultural/arts/music activities 87% 87% 86% 89% Similar higher higher higher Adult education 79% 76% 83% 79% Similar Higher Higher Higher Education and K-12 education 68% 65% 63% 69% Similar Similar Similar Similar Enrichment Child care/preschool 44% 47% 44% 45% Similar Similar Similar Similar Social events and activities 79% 81% 83% 81% Similar Higher Higher Higher Neighborliness 64% 66% 64% 63% Similar Similar Similar Similar Openness and acceptance 64% 67% 81% 68% Higher Similar Similar Higher Opportunities to participate in community Community matters 75% 73% 89% 80% Higher Similar Similar Higher Engagement Opportunities to volunteer 81% 83% 83% 87% Similar Similar Higher Higher *Where data is missing for 2017,2018 ratings have been compared to 2015 **results not weighted Table 3: Governance General Percent rating positively(e.g.,excellent/good) Comparison to benchmark opt-in rating** 2018 rating compared to previous year* 2015 2017 2018 Services provided by Denton 78% NA 83% 74% Similar* Similar NA Similar Customer service 73% 74% 73% 81% Similar Similar Similar Similar Value of services for taxes paid 53% 46% 50% 48% Similar Similar Similar Similar Overall direction 69% 48% 64% 51% Higher Similar Similar Similar Welcoming citizen involvement 58% 45% 62% 58% Higher Similar Similar Higher 3 The National Citizen SurveyT'" Percent rating positively(e.g.,excellent/good) Comparison to benchmark opt-in rating** 2018 rating compared to previous year* 2015 2017 2018 Confidence in City government 59% 37% 51% 46% Higher Similar Lower Similar Acting in the best interest of Denton 65% 39% 58% 47% Higher Similar Lower Similar Being honest 62% 42% 57% 45% Higher Similar Lower Similar Treating all residents fairly 55% 39% 59% 44% Higher Similar Lower Similar Services provided by the Federal Government 34% NA 42% 31% Similar* Similar NA Similar *Where data is missing for 2017,2018 ratings have been compared to 2015 **results not weighted Table 4: Governance by Facet Percent rating positively(e.g., excellent/good) 2018 rating compared to previous Comparison to benchmark opt-in rating** year* 2015 2017 2018 Police 72% 78% 75% 79% Similar Similar Similar Similar Fire 90% 93% 92% 96% Similar Similar Similar Similar Ambulance/EMS 86% 91% 96% 95% Similar Similar Similar Similar Crime prevention 69% 69% 61% 63% Similar Similar Similar Similar Fire prevention 73% 80% 72% 82% Similar Similar Similar Similar Animal control 67% 66% 75% 67% Similar Similar Similar Similar Safety Emergency preparedness 66% 69% 72% 72% Similar Similar Similar Similar Traffic enforcement 54% 55% 60% 52% Similar Similar Similar Similar 10% Much Much Much Street repair 21% 13% 19% Similar lower lower lower Street cleaning 52% 46% 48% 41% Similar Similar Lower Similar Street lighting 50% NA 45% 47% Similar* Similar NA Similar Snow removal 37% NA 45% 48% Similar* Lower NA Lower Sidewalk maintenance 44% 27% 40% 22% Higher Similar Lower Similar Traffic signal timing 39% 29% 33% 29% Similar Similar Lower Lower Mobility Bus or transit services 68% 41% 60% 41% Higher Similar Similar Higher Garbage collection 89% 86% 92% 88% Similar Similar Similar Similar Recycling 85% 86% 85% 87% Similar Similar Similar Similar Yard waste pick-up 81% 85% 83% 88% Similar Similar Similar Similar Drinking water 85% 74% 74% 75% Similar Similar Similar Similar Natural areas preservation 64% 62% 50% 45% Lower Similar Similar Similar Natural Environment Open space 58% 56% 51% 44% Similar Similar Similar Similar Storm drainage 61% 68% 65% 62% Similar Similar Similar Similar Sewer services 88% 81% 81% 85% Similar Similar Similar Similar Power utility 84% 75% 80% 78% Similar Similar Similar Similar Built Environment Utility billing 77% 67% 73% 66% Similar Similar Similar Similar 4 The National Citizen SurveyT'" Percent rating positively(e.g., excellent/good) 2018 rating compared to previous Comparison to benchmark opt-in rating** year* 2015 2017 2018 Land use, planning and 35% zoning 57% 34% 55% Higher Similar Similar Similar Code enforcement 51% 40% 47% 39% Similar Similar Similar Similar Cable television 64% NA 59% 44% Similar* Similar NA Similar Economy Economic development 62% 52% 63% 58% Higher Similar Similar Similar City parks 89% 83% 85% 88% Similar Similar Similar Similar Recreation programs 80% 78% 72% 85% Similar Similar Similar Similar Recreation centers 81% 76% 68% 81% Similar Similar Similar Similar Recreation and Wellness Health services 71% 65% 76% 69% Higher Similar Similar Similar Education and Special events 85% 80% 77% 79% Similar Higher Similar Similar Enrichment Public libraries 90% 92% 95% 93% Similar Similar Similar Similar Community Engagement Public information 729/ 73% 78% 72% Similar Similar Similar Similar *Where data is missing for 2017,2018 ratings have been compared to 2015 **results not weighted Table 5: Participation General Percent rating positively(e.g.,always/sometimes, more than once a month,yes) Comparison to benchmark 2015 2017 2018 2018 opt-in rating** 2018 rating compared to previous year* 2015 2017 2018 Sense of community 68% 73% 73% 69% Similar Similar Similar Similar Recommend Denton 89% 84% 89% 82% Similar Similar Similar Similar Remain in Denton 84% 82% 76% 85% Similar Similar Similar Similar Contacted Denton employees 52% NA 52% 62% Similar* Similar NA Similar *Where data is missing for 2017,2018 ratings have been compared to 2015 **results not weighted Table 6: Participation by Facet Percent rating positively(e.g.,always/sometimes, more than once a month,yes) 2018 rating compared to Comparison to benchmark 2015 2017 2018 2018 opt-in rating** previous year* 2015 2017 2018 Stocked supplies for an emergency 38% NA 22% 31% Lower* Similar NA Lower Did NOT report a crime 80% NA 86% 75% Similar* Similar NA Similar Safety Was NOT the victim of a crime 86% NA 89% 87% Similar* Similar NA Similar Used public transportation instead of driving 27% 31% 30% 29% Similar Similar Similar Similar Carpooled instead of driving alone 48% 52% 50% 52% Similar Similar Similar Similar Mobility Walked or biked instead of driving 55% 54% 55% 46% Similar Similar Similar Similar Conserved water 86% NA 88% 87% Similar* Similar NA Similar Natural Environment Made home more energy efficient 75% NA 66% 72% Similar* Similar NA Similar 5 The National Citizen SurveyT'" Percent rating positively(e.g.,always/sometimes, more than once a month,yes) 2018 rating compared to Comparison to benchmark 2015 2017 2018 2018 opt-in rating** previous year* 2015 2017 2018 Recycled at home 81% NA 82% 95% Similar* Similar NA Similar Did NOT observe a code violation 48% NA 41% 34% Similar* Similar NA Lower Built Environment NOT under housing cost stress 69% 73% 61% N/A Lower Similar Similar Similar Purchased goods or services in Denton 97% NA 99% 99% Similar* Similar NA Similar Economy will have positive impact on income 35% NA 36% 32% Similar* Similar NA Similar Economy Work in Denton 57% NA 59% 59% Similar* Higher NA Higher Used Denton recreation centers 59% 64% 41% 54% Lower Similar Similar Lower Visited a City park 87% 90% 79% 85% Lower Similar Similar Similar Ate 5 portions of fruits and vegetables 78% NA 70% 80% Similar* Similar NA Lower Participated in moderate or vigorous Recreation and physical activity 86% NA 72% 83% Lower* Similar NA Lower Wellness In very good to excellent health 55% NA 52% 58% Similar* Similar NA Similar Used Denton public libraries 68% 75% 53% 69% Lower Similar Higher Lower Participated in religious or spiritual activities 53% 54% 41% 47% Lower Similar Similar Similar Education and Much Enrichment Attended a City-sponsored event 62% 81% 52% 76% Lower Similar higher Similar Campaigned for an issue,cause or candidate 30% NA 20% 50% Lower* Similar NA Similar Contacted Denton elected officials 19% NA 13% 37% Similar* Similar NA Similar Much Volunteered 43% 63% 37% 59% Lower Similar higher Similar Participated in a club 32% 43% 31% 39% Lower Similar Higher Similar Talked to or visited with neighbors 91% 92% 89% 90% Similar Similar Similar Similar Done a favor for a neighbor 75% 85% 75% 78% Lower Similar Similar Similar Much Attended a local public meeting 21% 46% 20% 41% Lower Similar higher Similar Much Watched a local public meeting 22% 45% 16% 41% Lower Similar higher Similar Read or watched local news 82% NA 67% 90% Lower* Similar NA Lower Community Much Engagement Voted in local elections 76% NA 60% 89% Lower* Similar NA lower *Where data is missing for 2017,2018 ratings have been compared to 2015 **results not weighted 6 TM THE � NCS The National Citizen Survey TM Denton, TX Community Livability Report 2018 NRC 1CMA National Research Center Inc Leaders at the Core of Better Communities 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863 icma.org • 800-745-8780 0 Contents About.............................................................................................. 1 Quality of Life in Denton .................................................................. 2 Community Characteristics ...............................................................3 Governance ..................................................................................... 5 Participation ....................................................................................7 SpecialTopics..................................................................................9 Conclusions ................................................................................... 13 Charter Members The National Citizen SurveyTM AAI-' k © 2001-2018 National Research Center, Inc. TMnsparencv The NCSTM is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA. Initiative NRC is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing AIATION FOR PUBLICNASSO RESEARCH clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH Y About The National Citizen SurveyTM(The NCS)report is about the"livability"of Denton.The phrase"livable community"is used here to evoke a place that is not simply habitable,but that is desirable.It is not only where people do live,but where they want to live. Great communities are partnerships of the government,private sector,community-based organizations and residents,all geographically connected.The NCS captures residents'opinions Residents within the three pillars of a community (Community Characteristics,Governance and Participation)across eight central facets of community(Safety,Mobility,Natural — —4 r. I - Environment,Built Environment,Economy, Recreation and Wellness,Education and Communities Enrichment and Community Engagement). Private - • _ based _ partn The Community Livability Report provides the • rships organizations opinions of a representative sample of 216 residents of the City of Denton.The margin of error around any reported percentage is 7%for all respondents.The full description of methods used to garner these opinions can be found in the Technical Appendices provided under separate cover. Government 1 Quality of Life in Denton Overall Quality of Life Excellent About 8 in 10 residents rated the quality of life in Denton as excellent or 27% good.This was similar to ratings given in other communities across the nation(see Appendix B of the Technical Appendices provided under Poor -,\ANA separate cover). 3% Shown below are the eight facets of community.The color of each Fair Good community facet summarizes how residents rated it across the three 14% k 11% sections of the survey that represent the pillars of a community— Community Characteristics,Governance and Participation.When most ratings across the three pillars were higher than the benchmark,the color for that facet is the darkest shade;when most ratings were lower than the benchmark,the color is the lightest shade.A mix of ratings(higher and lower than the benchmark)results in a color between the extremes. In addition to a summary of ratings,the image below includes one or more stars to indicate which community facets were the most important focus areas for the community. Residents identified Safety,Mobility and Economy as priorities for the Denton community in the coming two years.These facets,as well as all other facets of community livability,received ratings that were positive and similar to the national benchmarks.This overview of the key aspects of community quality provides a quick summary of where residents see exceptionally strong performance and where performance offers the greatest opportunity for improvement. Linking quality to importance offers community members and leaders a view into the characteristics of the community that matter most and that seem to be working best. Details that support these findings are contained in the remainder of this Livability Report,starting with the ratings for Community Characteristics,Governance and Participation and ending with results for Denton's unique questions. Legend Higher than national benchmark Similar to national benchmark Lower than national benchmark Most important MobilityM'q 7' AN e Built Education and IF 1k, Environment Enrichment AF . . 2 Community Characteristics What makes a community livable, attractive and a place where people want to be? Overall quality of community life represents the natural ambience,services and amenities that make for an attractive community.How residents rate their overall quality of life is an indicator of the overall health of a community.In the case of Denton,86%rated the city as an excellent or good place to live.Respondents'ratings of Denton as a place to live were similar to ratings in other communities across the nation. In addition to rating the city as a place to live,respondents rated several aspects of community quality including Denton as a place to raise children and to retire,their neighborhood as a place to live,the overall image or reputation of Denton and its overall appearance.At least 7 in io residents gave positive reviews to the overall image and overall appearance of the city,their neighborhood as a place to live and Denton as a place to raise children,while 6 in io were pleased with the city as a place to retire.All of these ratings were similar to the national benchmarks. Delving deeper into Community Characteristics,survey respondents rated over 40 features of the community within the eight facets of Community Livability.Generally,most items were given positive ratings by a majority of respondents and these ratings were similar to or higher than those seen elsewhere.Resident evaluations of aspects of Education and Enrichment and Community Engagement were particularly strong;nearly all of these items received above-average ratings. Respondents were also pleased with aspects of Built Environment,Economy and Recreation and Wellness,and ratings for overall quality of new development,vibrant downtown/commercial area, overall quality of business and service establishments and availability of affordable quality mental health care and food were higher than those given in other communities across the nation. Ratings within the facet of Mobility were more mixed.About half of residents or more gave positive scores to the overall ease of travel,availability of paths and walking trails, Place to Live ease of walking and ease of travel by bicycle(which were Excellent similar to the national benchmarks)and ease of travel by 37% # public transportation(which was higher).However,about 4 in io residents or less gave favorable marks to ease of travel by car,public parking and traffic flow and these ratings were lower than those awarded in other communities across the nation.It is noteworthy that ratings for several Mobility- related items,including traffic flow,ease of walking and ease Poor of public transportation)increased over time.(Due to 7% Good differences in methodology,trends should be interpreted Fair) 50% cautiously;for more information see the Trends over Time 7% report under separate cover.) Percent rating positively(e.g., excellent/good) Comoarison to national benchmark ■Higher ■Similar ■Lower : • :•, __91 IV Overall image Neighborhood Place to raise children Place to retire Overall appearance 3 The National Citizen SurveyT'" Figure 1: Aspects of Community Characteristics Percent rating positively SAFETY (e.g., excellent/good, Overall feeling of safety very/somewhat safe) Safe in neighborhood Safe downtown/commercial area MOBILITY Comparison to national Overall ease of travel benchmark Paths and walking trails Ease of walking ■Higher Travel by bicycle Travel by public transportation Similar Travel by car 44% , Public parking 32% Lower Traffic flow 26% NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Overall natural environment 62% Cleanliness Air quality BUILT ENVIRONMENT Overall built environment New development in Denton Affordable quality housing Housing options Public places ECONOMY Overall economic health Vibrant downtown/commercial area Business and services Cost of living Shopping opportunities , Employment opportunities Place to visit Place to work RECREATION AND WELLNESS Health and wellness Mental health care Preventive health services •. Health care Food Recreational opportunities 757 Fitness opportunities EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT Education and enrichment opportunities : . Religious or spiritual events and activities Cultural/arts/music activities :. Adult education K-12 education Child care/preschool COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Social events and activities Neighborliness Openness and acceptance Opportunities to participate in community matters :•% Opportunities to volunteer 4 Governance How well does the government of Denton meet the needs and expectations of its residents? The overall quality of the services provided by Denton as well as the manner in which these services are provided is a key component of how residents rate their quality of life.In Denton,about 8 in 10 residents gave positive ratings to the overall quality of City services and 4 in 10 were pleased with the services provided by the Federal Government;both of these ratings were similar to those given elsewhere. Survey respondents also rated various aspects of Denton's leadership and governance.At least half of residents gave favorable marks to all aspects of government performance and all were similar to the national benchmarks except for the job Denton government does at welcoming citizen involvement,which was above average and improved over time.Further,ratings for several other aspects improved since 2017,including the overall direction of the City,overall confidence in City government,government acting in the best interest of Denton,being honest and treating all residents fairly. Respondents evaluated over 30 individual services and amenities available in Denton. Ratings for almost all items were positive and similar to the national benchmarks,with the exception of Mobility-related services:while the rating for bus or transit services was above average and improved since 2017,evaluations for street repair, snow removal and traffic signal timing were lower than the national benchmarks.Ratings improved over time for several other City services,including sidewalk maintenance;land use,planning and zoning; economic development; and health services. Overall Quality of City Services Excellent 22% A, Poor 5% IV —Good Fair-/ 61% 12% 4d Percent rating positively(e.g., excellent/good) Comparison to national benchmark ■Higher Similar Lower �• Value of Overall Welcoming Confidence Acting in the Being honest Treating all Customer Services services for direction citizen in City best interest residents service provided by taxes paid involvement government of Denton fairly the Federal Government 5 The National Citizen SurveyT1 Figure 2: Aspects of Governance Percent rating positively SAFETY (e.g., excellent/good) Police Fire Ambulance/EMS •.•, Comparison to national Crime prevention •, benchmark Fire prevention ■Higher Animal control Emergency preparedness ■Similar MOBILITY ■Lower Traffic enforcement .�•, Street repair Street cleaning •• Street lighting Snow removal 45% Sidewalk maintenance �•. Traffic signal timing 3% Bus or transit services .�•. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Garbage collection Recycling Yard waste pick-up 16 Drinking water Natural areas preservation �•, Open space BUILT ENVIRONMENT Storm drainage •. Sewer services Electric service :�•, Utility billing Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Cable television •• ECONOMY Economic development RECREATION AND WELLNESS City parks Recreation programs Recreation centers .:•. Health services EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT Public libraries Special events COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Public information 6 Participation Are the residents of Denton connected to the community and each other? An engaged community harnesses its most valuable resource,its residents.The connections and trust among residents,government,businesses and other organizations help to create a sense of community,a shared sense of membership,belonging and history.About three-quarters of Denton residents gave excellent or good ratings to the sense of community in the city and planned to remain in Denton for the next five years,while 9 in 10 would recommend living in the city to someone who asked.These ratings were similar to those given in other communities across the nation. The survey included over 3o activities and behaviors for which respondents indicated how often they participated in or performed each,if at all.Levels of Participation tended to vary widely across the different facets,making the benchmark comparisons useful for interpreting the results.Generally,participation rates tended to be similar to those observed in other communities.Denton residents were more likely than those who lived elsewhere to work in the city,but less likely to have stocked supplies for an emergency,not observed a code violation,used Denton recreation centers or public libraries,exhibited healthy behaviors,read or watched local news or voted in local elections. Compared to prior years,many rates of Participation declined in 2018,particularly within the facets of Recreation and Wellness,Education and Enrichment and Community Engagement.However,it is important to note that the changes in these ratings over time may be attributable to a change in Sense of Community survey methodology from 2017 to 2018(see the Trends over Time report Excellent for more information). 24% Poor 4 5% —Good 49% le Fair 22% Percent rating positively Comparison to national (e.g., very/somewhat likely, benchmark yes) ■Higher Similar Lower Recommend Denton Remain in Denton Contacted Denton employees 7 The National Citizen SurveyT1 Figure 3: Aspects of Participation Percent rating positively SAFETY (e.g.,yes, more than Stocked supplies for an emergency once a month, always/sometimes) Did NOT report a crime Was NOT the victim of a crime Comparison to national MOBILITY benchmark Used public transportation instead of driving �•, ■Higher Carpooled instead of driving alone �•, ■Similar Walked or biked instead of driving NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ■Lower Conserved water Made home more energy efficient ..•, Recycled at home BUILT ENVIRONMENT Did NOT observe a code violation 41% NOT under housing cost stress ECONOMY Purchased goods or services in Denton r ••• Economy will have positive impact on income .•. Work in Denton RECREATION AND WELLNESS Used Denton recreation centers 41% Visited a City park Ate 5 portions of fruits and vegetables 70% Participated in moderate or vigorous physical activity 72% In very good to excellent health EDUCATION AND ENRICHMENT Used Denton public libraries 53% Participated in religious or spiritual activities Attended a City-sponsored event COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Campaigned for an issue, cause or candidate �•, Contacted Denton elected officials Volunteered Participated in a club Talked to or visited with neighbors :•• Done a favor for a neighbor Attended a local public meeting �•, Watched a local public meeting .•. Read or watched local news 67% Voted in local elections 60% 8 Special Topics The City of Denton included four questions of special interest on The NCS.Topic areas included City information sources,customer service provided by the City and voter participation. Residents were asked to rate various aspects of City information sources.About two-thirds of residents or more gave favorable marks to the relevance of topics in the Resident Update newsletter,the quality of the City website, the availability of City information and the quality of the City's video production and cable TV channel.Residents were least likely to positively rate City efforts to engage residents on social media sites; about half gave this an excellent or good rating. Figure 4: City of Denton Communications Please rate the following aspects of City of Denton communications: ■Excellent ■Good ■Fair Poor The relevance of topics in the ,, 25% 4% Resident Update newsletter The quality of the City's website 26% 6% (www.cityofdenton.com) The availability of information about City programs and services 23°�° 9°�° The quality of the City's video production and cable television ° ° channel (Charter 194, Grande 12, 32 i°i° Frontier 38) The usefulness of information in the Citizen Connection (utility bill 30% 7% newsletter) City efforts to educate citizens about environmental and sustainable 26% 13% practices , City efforts to keep citizens informed ,. 16% about local issues City efforts to engage citizens on social media sites 18°�° 9 The National Citizen Survey"' Thinking about sources of information about the City,more than 8 in to residents indicated that they used the City website and word of mouth/friends as major or minor sources of information,while about 7 in 10 considered the Denton Record-Chronicle,CodeRed emergency notifications,the Citizen Connection,public buildings and the Resident Update newsletter to be information sources. Residents were least likely to utilize a City cable television channel,the City YouTube channel or their homeowner/neighborhood association as sources of City information. Figure 5: Sources of City Information Please indicate how much of a source, if at all, you consider each of the following to be for obtaining information about the City government and its activities, events and services: ■Major source ■Minor source Not a source City website (www.cityofdenton.com) 13% Word of mouth/friends i 14% Denton Record-Chronicle 29% CodeRed emergency notifications -.% 30% Citizen Connection (utility bill newsletter) 32% Public buildings(brochures, posters, 32% signage) Resident Update newsletter 32% City email news updates and alerts 38% City Facebook or Twitter feed 43% Other local news source 45% City staff 47% Public meetings 51% City Council 55% City cable television channel (Charter 194, Grande 12, Frontier 38) 65% City YouTube channel 66% Your homeowner/neighborhood 0,, 71% association 10 The National Citizen Survey"' About one-third of residents indicated that their most preferred method of customer service interaction with the City was in-person or face-to-face and 2 in to preferred telephone or email interaction.One in ten or fewer preferred an internet app,mail/fax,social media or a mobile phone app for City customer service interaction. Figure 6: Preferred Customer Service Interaction Please indicate which of the following is your preferred method of customer service interaction with the City of Denton Employees:(Please select only one.) In-person/face-to-face 36% Telephone 24% E-mail 20% Internet application 10% Mail/fax 5% Social media (i e, Facebook,Twitter, etc) 3% Mobile phone application 2% Other 0% When asked to rate their impression of their most recent customer service interaction with a Denton employee, residents were most likely to give positive ratings to the timely resolution of their request,the courtesy and helpfulness of City staff and the competence and knowledge of staff(8 in 10 excellent or good). Figure 7: Customer Service Performance Thinking about your most recent experience with the City of Denton,please rate your impression of the following categories of customer service performance. ■Excellent ■Good ■Fair Poor The timely resolution of your 11% 6% request The courtesy and helpfulness of 13% 5% City staff The competence and knowledge 14% 5% of City staff The ease of locating contact o ° information 19 i°i° The availability of City staff o 0 (hours of operation) 23/o 7�o The length of time you waited (waiting on hold,waiting in line, 23% 12% etc.)to submit a request 11 The National Citizen Survey"' Thinking about their participation in the previous election,about 7 in io residents indicated that they had not voted,while 3 in io had.Of those who had not voted,about one-third of residents indicated that they had not been aware of the election and 1 in io were not registered to vote.Very few residents had not voted because the voting location was inconvenient.About 6 in io residents had not voted for some other reason. Figure 8: Voter Participation Did you vote in the previous municipal election in Denton? Yes _31% No J 69% Figure 9: Reasons for Not Voting Did you vote in the previous municipal election in Denton? Why not?(Mark all that apply.) Not aware of election 35% Not registered to vote 16% Voting location inconvenient 4% Other 58% Total may exceed 100%as respondents could select more than one option. 12 0 0 E Conclusions Denton residents continue to enjoy a high quality of life. About 8 in io residents gave positive ratings to the overall quality of life in Denton and the city as a place to live. At least three-quarters of residents also were pleased with the overall image and overall appearance of the city, their neighborhood as a place to live and the city as a place to raise children,and 6 in io felt Denton as a place to retire was excellent or good.While most of these evaluations were stable from 2017 to 2018,the rating for overall appearance increased.Residents remain loyal to the community,with more than 7 in io residents planning to remain in Denton for the next five years and 9 in io recommending living in Denton to someone who asked.These ratings all were similar to those given in other communities across the nation. Safety ratings are strong and Safety is a priority for the community. Denton residents indicated that Safety was an important focus area for the City and ratings within this facet tended to be positive.Nine in io residents reported feeling safe in their neighborhood and in Denton's downtown and gave excellent or good ratings to fire and ambulance/EMS services.At least 7 in io residents gave favorable marks to police services,fire prevention,animal control and emergency preparedness;these ratings were all similar to the national average.However,only 22%of respondents had stocked supplies for an emergency,a level which decreased from 2015 to 2018 and was lower than levels reported in other communities. Economy is an important area of focus for the City. Residents indicated that Economy would be an important area for the City to focus on in the next two years and ratings within this facet tended to be positive.Nearly 8 in io residents were pleased with Denton's vibrant downtown/commercial area and the overall quality of business and service establishments(both of which were higher than the benchmark),and other Economy-related items such as the overall economic health of the city, shopping and employment opportunities and Denton as a place to visit and to work received ratings similar to those given in other communities across the nation. Denton residents were more likely to work within the city than those who lived elsewhere. Mobility is also a resident priority. Residents also indicated that they would like to see the City address aspects of Mobility in the coming years.When evaluating ratings within this facet,there were some bright spots: at least half of residents gave positive marks to the overall ease of travel,paths and walking trails,ease of walking and ease of travel by public transportation (which was higher than the national benchmark and an improvement since the previous survey iteration). Further,the ratings for bus or transit services was higher than average,and resident sentiment toward traffic flow, ease of travel by bicycle and by walking,and paths and walking trails improved from 2017 to 2018.However, ratings for the ease of travel by car,public parking,traffic flow,street repair,snow removal and traffic signal timing were lower than the national benchmark comparisons. 13 December 14, 2018 2018-179 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Provide notification of the end of the 2018 mosquito season. DISCUSSION: Based on mosquito trap results from the last several weeks, low temperature ranges, and results of the West Nile virus (WNV) screening by the Texas Department of State Health Services and the University of North Texas (UNT),Denton staff members consider the 2018 mosquito season to be completed. In accordance with the City of Denton's Mosquito Surveillance and Response Plan (MSRP), the West Nile Virus risk level will be reset to Risk Level two, and will remain at that level until the start of the 2019 mosquito season. The following information is provided as a brief summary of the 2018 season: • Trapping began on May I and ended on November 25. • Approximately 532 traps deployed for routine monitoring(samples sent to the TDSHS for WNV testing and mosquito species identification) • Approximately 248 traps deployed for local testing for WNV (conducted by UNT) • Approximately 2,704 larvicide applications by the Drainage department • 92 larvicide treatments distributed to citizens • Two traps tested positive for WNV. The earliest detection was on September 24, and the latest detection was October 29. • No reported cases of human WNV within the City of Denton • No California Serogroup viruses were detected in the City of Denton • No reported cases of human Zika within the City of Denton The 2018 season was a second consecutive mild season with a late onset at the end of September. A very similar pattern observed in 2017. The sampling of mosquitoes occurred for a longer period of time due to the last WNV positive mosquito trapping occurring in late October. Mosquito trapping started at the beginning of May and was extended until late November. The first hard freeze,the typical weather indicator used as the ending of the WNV mosquito season,was recorded in mid-November. There are many staff members across the organization that are involved in the City of Denton's Mosquito Surveillance and Response activities. These staff members include the Drainage Department, Public Communication Office, Technology Services, the Water Department, and Watershed Protection. The Mosquito Surveillance and Response Program would not be possible without the dedication and hard work of these staff members. The University of North Texas researchers (Dr. Jim Kennedy, Taylor Gillum, Gillian Graham, Katie Vazquez, Katherine Cline, and Marti Sanders) and numerous other graduate students at the University of North Texas also worked diligently to ensure mosquito monitoring efforts and local WNV testing was completed efficiently. It is a great honor to work with this group of City of Denton staff members and UNT researchers. December 14, 2018 2018-179 I also would like to thank the City Council for their continuous support during the 2018 mosquito season. Please let me know if I can provided any additional information. STAFF CONTACT: Deborah Viera, Assistant Director of Environmental Services 940.349.7162 Deborah.Vierancityofdenton.com Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-180 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Provide an overview of the process used by area municipalities to permit horse riding and/or horse- drawn carriages on public roads and information on how a similar provision could be implemented in Denton. BACKGROUND: During Concluding Items on November 27, 2018, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan requested information about the City's current regulations regarding riding horses and the use of horse-drawn carriages within City limits. A brief write-up was included in the November 30 Friday Report that explained the Code of Ordinances currently prohibits horse riding and the use horse-drawn carriages on all public property, including the paved roadway (attached as item N. in Exhibit 1). Current code exceptions can be granted by the Chief of Police for special events including parades. Following that report,Mayor Pro Tern Ryan requested additional information on the practices used by other municipalities to permit horse riding and/or the use of horse-drawn carriages and what could be done to modify the City of Denton's current horse riding and horse-drawn carriage restrictions. Staff polled Arlington, Colleyville, Dallas, Flower Mound, Fort Worth, Highland Park, Highland Village, McKinney, Plano, and Ponder and summarized the practices used by these cities below: Horse-Drawn Carriages Several area municipalities currently permit the use of horse-drawn carriages on public roads through their vehicle for hire ordinances. Area horse-drawn carriage permits generally include the following: • Permit fee o Area permit fees for horse-drawn carriages average $100 annually; • An outline of health, safety, and sanitation requirements for the animal; • Safety requirements for the carriage; • Driver solicitation and conduct restrictions; and • An agreed upon route, pickup/drop off location, and hours of operation. o Most cities that allow horse-drawn carriages on City streets allow them in specific geographies such as downtown business districts or tourist areas. The City of Arlington has a comprehensive horse-drawn carriage ordinance including detailed requirements for health, safety, and sanitation requirements. This ordinance is attached as Exhibit 2. Horse Back Riding Staff also researched local municipalities that allow horseback riding on public streets. The majority of cities polled have restrictions similar to those in our Code of Ordinances prohibiting Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-180 horseback riding on public streets. The City of Fort Worth classifies horseback riders as "vulnerable road users"who must follow the same laws as bicyclists. DISCUSSION If the City Council provides staff direction to allow horse-drawn carriages or horseback riding on public roads in Denton, a number of steps will be required including: • Create and approve a new ordinance that either amends or repeals the existing ordinance. • Draft and approve a new ordinance that clearly defines requirements and enforcement mechanisms. Following the structure that many other cities follow, this ordinance could be placed within Chapter 27 of Denton's Code of Ordinances which regulates Vehicles for Hire. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 —Horse-Drawn Carriages and Horses on Public Streets Exhibit 2 - Section 8.06 Horse-drawn Carriage Service—City of Arlington STAFF CONTACT: Stuart Birdseye Management Analyst (940) 349-8009 stuart.birdseyekcityofdenton.com location and will provide student residents with a more direct connection to the UNT campus. Staff contact: Pritam Deshmukh, Capital Projects K. DME Locust Substation Connection Construction Update—DME is in the process of completing power line work needed to energize the new Locust Substation in February 2019. Chapman Construction has started to rebuild the transmission line that spans Collins,Carroll,and Ft.Worth Drive.New galvanized poles will replace the aging wood poles that are currently in place and provide an enhanced level of structural integrity. The project will result in the closure of Collins Street from the intersection of Carroll Blvd. to approximately two blocks west for various periods of time. Intermittent lane closures on Carroll Blvd. will also be required to insure the safety of motorists and contractors. This project segment should be completed by mid-December. Following completion of this work, the final work needed to energize the new Locust Substation will take place on Locust Street near the substation. Staff contact: Chris Lutrick, DME L. Way finding Si rgnage Project—Phases 2 and 3 of the Wayfinding Signage Project will be completed the week of Dec. 3. Color-Ad, the company manufacturing and installing the wayfinding signs, is in town through next week installing signs. Phase 2 and 3 includes several Downtown Gateway signs and over 100 vehicular directional signs. This is the last phase under contract with Color-Ad. Future project phases, including wayfinding signage along I-35, will be brought to the City Council for consideration and direction. Staff contact: Ron Menguita, Development Services M. Fireside Park Development—Staff and City Council has received several inquiries regarding the Fireside Park Development (with an attached Final Plat) that is going in the Northridge area. Representatives from the City Manager's Office, Capital Projects, and Development Services met on Friday, Nov. 30 to discuss a communication plan with residents. During that meeting, staff decided to broaden the scope of a previously planned public meeting on the Hinkle-Magnolia Drainage project to discuss the site plan, project layout, and review process that was involved with the approval of this project. The public meeting will take place on Wednesday, Dec. 12 from 6:30-8:00 p.m. at the North Lake Park Recreation Center. Staff will provide additional information about plans for the Dec. 12 meeting in the Dec. 7 Friday Report. Staff contact: Mario Canizares, CMO N. Horse Drawn Carriages and Horses on Public Streets - During the closing comments of the November 27,2018 City Council Meeting,Mayor Pro Tern Ryan requested information about riding horses and horse drawn carriages within City limits. Section 6-28 of the Code of Ordinances prohibits horses and horse-drawn carriages on any public property including the paved roadway. However, horses may be ridden on the unimproved or unpaved portion of the right-of-way, and the chief of police may authorize horses to be ridden on the road during a parade. Staff contact: Stuart Birdseye, Public Affairs O. Upcoming Construction Project Public Information Meetings-the City of Denton has scheduled five public information meetings throughout the month of Arlington Horse-drawn Carriage Ordinance Section 8.06 Horse-drawn Carriage Service A. Certificate holders, applicants and drivers operating a horse-drawn carriage service shall be governed by the provisions of this Article in addition to all other applicable Articles and fees as approved by City Council resolution. B. A proposed detailed route system of an equine-drawn vehicle for hire shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review, recommendation and approval.The Public Works Department shall designate streets,traffic lanes and hours of the day that equine-drawn vehicles will be permitted.A route system shall be submitted for each vehicle to be placed into operation. This detailed route system shall include the following information: 1.The hours of operation for the vehicle. 2.The days of the week the vehicle will be in operation. 3.The duration of the operation, i.e., summer only or year-round. 4. All locations for loading and unloading passengers. C. A horse-drawn carriage may operate only on the streets and designated traffic lanes and during the times proposed in the application for the certificate and approved by the Public Works Department. D. Holders and drivers are subject to the following regulations regarding fares: 1. A driver or holder shall not charge a fare for operating a horse drawn carriage service that is inconsistent with the rates authorized in the holder's certificate. 2. A holder desiring to change the authorized rates of fare must submit a written request to the Administrator. 3.The rates listed in the holder's certificate must be strictly adhered to and no change in rates may be implemented without review of the Administrator. 4.The holder shall provide each driver with rates of fares, which rates shall be available to passengers upon request. E. All horse drawn carriages shall comply with the following safety, condition, appearance, equipment, sign and marking regulations: 1. Holder shall keep its equipment in a neat, clean, operable and safe condition,and attractive to the general public. 2. Holder shall identify each carriage with the name of the entity holding the certificate and shall number each of the vehicles; such letters and numbers shall be at least one (1) inch in height. 3. Each carriage operating in the City pursuant to this article shall have the following lighting and reflector equipment: a. Vehicle rear shall have: (1) One (1) or two (2) lamps displaying red lights which shall be at least four(4) inches in diameter and use a bulb of at least thirty-two (32) candlepower. If only one (1) lamp is used, it shall be mounted as far to the left, towards the front, as possible. (2)Two (2) red reflectors which shall be at least three (3) inches in diameter or seven (7) square inches in diameter.The reflectors shall be mounted below the lamps, but not lower than two (2)feet from the ground. b. Vehicle front shall have: (1)At least one (1) lamp displaying a white light.The lamp shall be at least four(4) inches in diameter and use a bulb of at least thirty-two (32) candlepower. (2) If only one (1) lamp is used, it shall be mounted as far to the left, looking forward, as possible and shall not be obscured from view by the driver,the passenger or the horse pulling the vehicle. (3)The lamp shall be mounted no less than two (2)feet from the ground. c. Sides of vehicle shall have: (1)Two (2)white,yellow or amber reflectors that shall be mounted on each side of the vehicle. (2)The reflectors shall be at least three (3) inches in diameter or seven (7) square inches. (3) Such reflectors shall be mounted no less than two feet from the ground. d. Front legs of horse shall have: (1) A reflective wrap that shall be worn by a horse on each of its front legs. (2)The wraps must cover at least from the horse's ankle to the knee. 4.The lamps required by this section shall be in use and operational during nighttime hours beginning one-half(1/2) hour before sunset and at any other time when weather conditions cause reduction in visibility. 5. All horse-drawn carriages shall display a "slow moving vehicle" emblem on the center rear body of the vehicle.The emblem shall be a thirteen and three-fourths (13 3/4) inch fluorescent orange triangle with a one and five-eighths (15/8) inch red reflective border.The emblem shall meet the current standards adopted by the "American Society of Agricultural Engineers," shall be visible in daylight or at night when illuminated by the lower beams of headlamps for a distance of not less than five hundred (500) feet and shall be mounted not less than three (3) feet from the ground. No decorative trim or any part of the vehicle shall cover or obscure any part of the emblem at any time. 6. All horse-drawn carriage wheels shall be firmly attached to the hub and shall not wobble excessively. All spring axles and supporting structures shall be intact without any visible breaks or deflection greater than incurred by a normal load. 7. Each horse-drawn carriage shall be equipped with a suitable and efficient manually operated braking mechanism designed for such carriage. 8. The harness attachment to the horse and to the carriage shall have safety devices to ensure that the horse cannot break away from its harness or the carriage.The driver shall inspect the harness each day prior to placing the carriage into service. 9. No equine will be worked without a padded saddle or a bit that is approved by the Administrator. 10.The harness must be oiled and cleaned so as to be soft at all times. 11.All pads must be clean and kept soft at all times. 12.The harness will be properly fitted and maintained and kept free of makeshift material such as wire, sisal rope and hazardous rusty chain. 13.Vehicles for hire pulled by equine must be properly lubricated and wheels must spin freely. Such vehicles for hire must be inspected and approved for service by the Administrator annually, but are subject to removal of service pending repair and reinspection. 14. Vehicles shall conform to the following specifications: a.The wheel base shall be equal to or less than 14 feet. b.The total overall length of the vehicle shall be equal to or less than 28 feet. c. The maximum overall width of the vehicle shall be equal to or less than 78 inches. d.The tires shall be rubber or other resilient material. Metal tires shall be prohibited. e.The vehicle right turn radii shall not be greater than 12 feet for the right rear wheel and 24 feet for the left front wheel. f.The vehicle shall be drawn by no more than two equine, except at parades and at special events approved by the Administrator. 15. No equine shall pull a vehicle for hire unless such equine is wearing a diaper. Diapers must be properly fitting and constructed of a sturdy material to ensure comfort to the equine and complete waste disposal. G. Holders and drivers shall comply with the following provisions regarding condition and treatment of horses and routes: 1. Each year, before any horse is brought into service, a licensed veterinarian who specializes in equine medicine must examine the horse. 2. A holder shall annually submit a complete state certificate of veterinarian inspection to the Administrator. 3. Any horse brought into service must: a. Weigh at least one thousand (1,000) pounds; b. Be a gelding or a mare; and c. Be at least three (3)years old. 4. A holder shall be responsible for maintaining the following information for each horse brought into service: a. Current veterinarian examination record; b. Current picture of the horse; and c. Immunization record of rabies, tetanus, influenza and Eastern and Western equine, updated annually. d. Coggins test with negative results as required by state law. e. Fit for service in pulling vehicles for hire. 5. All holders shall provide horses with sufficient, wholesome and appropriate food and fresh potable drinking water. While working, each horse shall be permitted to eat at reasonable intervals and have access to drinking water when necessary. In addition, if the equine works more than ten hours in any 24-hour period,there shall be at least one 20-minute rest break or two ten-minute rest breaks per hour. 6. All holders shall keep all routes clean and free of horse excrement.The failure to keep all routes clean is grounds for suspension or revocation of the certificate. 7. A horse shall not be left unattended except when confined to a stable or other enclosure. 8. No driver of an equine-drawn vehicle for hire may whip an equine with more than a light touch by a whip approved by the Administrator. 9. No equine shall be used to pull a vehicle for hire without properly fitting shoes on each properly trimmed hoof. Should an equine throw a shoe during its shift,the time and location must be noted on the trip sheet, and the hoof must be examined by the driver and any nails removed.The equine may complete the fare, but must be shod prior to the next day's shift. 10.A holder may not work a horse when the temperature at any City site monitored by the National Weather Service is reported to be at or below thirty(30) degrees Fahrenheit. 11.A horse cannot work more than two (2) hours when the temperature is reported by the National Weather Service to exceed ninety-five (95) degrees Fahrenheit. 12.A horse cannot work more than two (2) hours when the combined temperature and humidity index for Arlington exceeds a numerical value of one hundred fifty(150), as measured by the National Weather Service. 13.The equine shall have no open sores or wounds, shall not be lame or have any other ailment. Any equine found to have an ailment shall not be used without the approval of an approved veterinarian. 14.The equine must be groomed daily and not have fungus, a dirty coat or exhibit symptoms of illness or irritation. 15.The equine must have adequate flesh and muscle tone. 16.The equine must be no more than six months pregnant. 17. No equine used as provided in this article shall be worked under any of the following conditions and any holder or driver permitting equine to be worked under any of the following conditions will be found in violation of this article: a. Pull any combined weight, including passengers and driver, in excess of two times the equine's body weight. No equine or combination of equine shall pull any vehicle which is occupied by a number of persons which exceeds such vehicle's normal safe seating capacity; b. Move at a speed faster than a slow trot.A slow trot means a speed of five to 15 miles per hour; c. Work more than 50 hours in any seven-day period or if the equine works more than five consecutive days; d. Work with equipment, other than normal blinders, which causes an impairment of vision; e. Subject to any condition or treatment which will impair the good health and physical condition of the equine; or f. Subject to any conditions that constitute a violation of Texas Penal Code Section 42.09 or Animals Chapter Section 9.07 referencing cruelty to animals or care and humane treatment of animals. 18. For purposes of this section,working hours of equine shall include time spent on rest breaks and all the time equine is available for hire. 19.The Administrator shall have the authority to implement programs to ensure public safety. H. Holders and drivers shall comply with the following provisions regarding operating regulations: 1. Vehicles shall travel in the curb lane except when passing parked vehicles or other obstructions which prevent use of the curb lane. 2. Vehicles shall not travel on streets with grades equal to or greater than ten percent without approval of the Administrator and Public Works Department. 3. Vehicles shall not stop within the roadway other than at designated loading and unloading areas except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control sign or signal. 4. Drivers shall observe all applicable rules of the road in accordance with the State of Texas Transportation Chapter and all applicable ordinances. 5.The driver of an equine drawn carriage shall: a. Possess and display at all times his or her license to operate an equine-drawn carriage in the front/passenger compartment of the carriage. b. A driver shall not drive a carriage when a passenger is standing in the carriage or not seated securely inside of the carriage. c. A driver shall provide humane care and treatment of the equine under his or her direct supervision and control. d. No person shall drive or operate an equine drawn carriage on any public street in the city at any hour other than those so designated by the Public Works Director or his designee. I. Each certificate holder for the operation of a horsedrawn carriage service shall comply with the following provisions regarding insurance. 1. Each certificate holder shall purchase and keep in full force and effect liability insurance. 2.The minimum insurance required under this section must: a. Be obtained from a carrier that is admitted and licensed to transact insurance in the State of Texas; b. Be written on an occurrence basis; c. Cover any and all carriages and drivers in the holder's fleet and all drivers of such vehicles; d. Be acceptable to the City's Risk Manager; e. Name the City of Arlington and its officers and employees as additional primary insured; f. Provide minimum coverage in an amount no less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) combined single limit liability per occurrence; g. Provide that all claims will be paid on a first dollar basis by the insurance provider; h. Not be obtained from an assigned risk pool; i. Not contain policy exclusions that would change or limit coverage for passengers entering or exiting vehicles; and j. Provide that all vehicles permitted to operate under the certificate are listed as scheduled vehicles covered under the policy. 3. All liability insurance coverage must include a rider that provides that at all levels of coverage, there must be notification to the City in writing not less than thirty(30) days before canceling or making a material change in the policy. 4.The holder shall not have operational control in any insurance company providing coverage to the vehicles operated under the certificate. Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-181 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Technology and innovative solutions to improve operational efficiency for traffic and roadway projects. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Dec. 7 Friday Report included a write-up on boring technology that referenced research that staff is conducting on new street paving machinery. Below is an overview of the research that the Capital Projects Department has conducted to-date on street paving technology intended to increase efficiency, reduce safety issues, reduce long term costs and improve roadway quality. BACKGROUND: One area that Capital Projects has researched is pothole patching. New purpose-built machines enable one crew member to complete the work that previously required a crew of two or three employees to complete. This specific machine that staff is currently considering,the Python 5000, not only reduces operational headcount,but also improves efficiency by at least 50%while greatly increasing safety for the operator. Capital Projects is working with the maker of the Python 5000, Superior Roads Solutions to gather additional information about the product and to schedule a demonstration to see the machine in action. Capital Projects will continue to research the longevity of the machine including maintenance costs, availability of parts, and customer feedback prior to determining if the equipment is worth the investment. Capital Projects is also sending a few staff to World of Asphalt Conference this February located in Indianapolis, IN. Staff will be able to talk to many vendors, educators, and fellow public works employees about their successes and failures. The seminars will allow us to sharpen our skills and improve our processes. The trade show will allow staff to see many of the new technologies firsthand while seeking feedback from organizations who have experience using the new equipment. Staff is also researching ways to better manage our inventory of street signs. Street signs placed around the community fade due to the sun and other weather conditions, our on-hand inventory is used to replace those signs when they are no longer visible. The on-hand sign inventory is stored in a warehouse; stored signs have an expiration date if left for an extended period in the warehouse. New printing technology could reduce the need for warehouse storage by increasing the speed and efficiency of printing signs on an as-needed basis.New technology could also allow staff to replace the faded ink, or skin, on the sign while reusing the sign plates. Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-181 Capital Projects will also send staff the American Traffic Safety Services Association Convention & Traffic Expo this February. During this conference, staff will learn about new technologies, meet vendors, and learn new ways to improve processes and efficiency. The seminars will allow us to sharpen our skills and improve our processes. CONCLUSION: Capital Projects will continue to research new technologies and best practices to ensure roadways are maintained and signalized as efficiently as possible. Staff will provide additional updates as new technology is implemented to improve the construction and maintenance of our street and traffic infrastructure. STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Kremer Deputy Director of Operations Capital Projects Department (940) 349-7193 Daniel.Kremer@cityofdenton.com Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-182 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Provide procedural information for the Impact Fee Public Hearing that will be held on December 18, 2018. DISCUSSION: On November 13, 2018, City of Denton staff and representatives from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. presented the 2018 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee update to the City Council. During the same meeting, the Council also approved an ordinance to hold a public hearing regarding impact fee adoption on December 18, 2018. The Agenda Information Sheet associated with the Public Hearing item stated that "based on guidance and direction from the City Council, Staff will present an agenda item with a Draft ordinance establishing amended impact fees on December 11, 2018." However, Council did not provide direction and a recommendation for adoption of the updated water and wastewater impact fees on November 13, 2018, and instead directed staff to hold the public hearing so the Council could receive public comments prior to providing this direction. Due to the Council's direction, the public hearing that will be held on December 18 is different from a typical public hearing because there is not an associated ordinance. As a part of the hearing, staff is seeking direction and a Council recommendation for adoption of the updated water and wastewater impact fees. Once this direction is provided, staff will add the resulting impact fees to the impact fee ordinance, and will provide this ordinance for consideration as a consent agenda item as soon as possible after the public hearing. However, due to the holidays, staff anticipates the impact fee ordinance will likely be provided at one of the first two Council meetings in January 2019. Staff will be glad to provide any additional information upon request. STAFF CONTACT(S): Kenneth Banks General Manager of Utilities (940) 349-7165 Kenneth.B anks(a,cityofdenton.com Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-183 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: During the Nov. 13, City Council Work Session, Council Member Keely Briggs asked if Tree Mitigation Funding was used to support staff salaries. BACKGROUND: The Denton Development Code(DDC)Sec. 13.13.7 states that tree funds shall be used to purchase, plant and maintain trees, to preserve wooded property that remains in a naturalistic state in perpetuity, to perform and maintain a city-wide tree inventory and to educate citizens and developers on the benefits and value of trees, all within the City of Denton. The Tree Fund may also be used to support programs for the public purpose of increasing the tree canopy within the City of Denton as approved by City Council. The Tree Mitigation Fund supports many tree-related initiatives for Parks and Recreation and Keep Denton Beautiful (KDB). The Tree Mitigation Fund is comprised of three separate accounting groups with specific functions including Tree Preservation,Tree Rebates, and KDB Tree Initiative Programs. The table below provides the fund balance of those separate accounting units dating back to FY 2016-2017. Beginning Fund Balance $ 2,448,487 $ 2,374,629 S 2,202,823 $ 2,227,260 Tree Preservation(Public Tree Planting) $ 302,510 $ 214,812 $ 231,746 5 825,000 KDB Denton Tree Initiatives Programs $ 153,016 $ 56,353 $ 31,100 5 30,000 KDB Tree Rebates $ 11,733 $ 23,420 S 16,692 5 23,100 Total Expense $ 467,260 $ 294,585 $ 279,537 $ 878,100 Total Revenue $ 393,402 $ 122,769 $ 303,984 $ 310,000 Ending Fund Balance $ 2,374,629 5 2,202,813 $ 2,227,260 $ 1,659,160 Tree Preservation - accounts for planting trees within the parks system and medians throughout the City. The Parks and Recreation Department focuses on tree planting efforts primarily in areas that can benefit the community. These areas include along trails, benches, gathering spaces to maximize shade opportunities. Medians are also a focus area for planting to improve city beautification, traffic calming measures, and the reduction of heat island impact. Expenses for these functions totaled $231,746 in FY2017-2018. Tree Rebates - refers to a program where residents purchasing trees are eligible for a $50 rebate for planting a qualifying tree of a minimum size. In FY2017-2018, $7,900 in tree rebates were Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-183 distributed. This accounting group also pays for an intern position to administer the program. Total expenses related to the Tree Rebates were $16,692 in FY2017-2018. Tree Rebates were approved as a qualified expenditure of Tree Mitigation Funds through Ordinance 2015-240. Denton Tree Initiative - The remaining accounting group relates to the Denton Tree Initiative (DTI). At the request of City Council,the City partnered with KDB,Inc.to use this funding source to create the Denton Tree Initiative (www.dentontreeinitiative.com). Ordinance 2015-241 approved the adoption of the programs. The DTI programs are administered by KDB, and include private property tree planting programs such as Trees Mean Business, a tree giveaway at the Denton Redbud Festival, and Tree Your Block neighborhood tree giveaways. The City makes an upfront payment to KDB based on the estimated budget approved by City Council and KDB remits any unused program funds to the City. In FY2017-2018 the actual cost of these DTI programs was $31,100. Prior to FY 2017-2018, interns were funded from the Tree Fund for implementation of these programs. The FY2018-2019 DTI budget does not include funding for an intern. DISCUSSION The Tree Code was specifically amended through Ordinance 2015-252 to accommodate the request by City Council for the uses outlined by KDB to increase the tree canopy (Tree Rebates and the DTI). Staff presented to City Council a three year budget that included cost estimates for each program, and costs for a part-time Tree Rebate Intern to process applications and a part-time Community Forestry Intern to assist with the new programs to ensure success. Legal, Planning, Finance, and CMO reviewed the Tree Code amendment, in addition to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, to ensure it would allow for the uses proposed by KDB. The Tree Mitigation Fund includes revenue primarily from tree mitigation fees,totaling$303,984 in FY2017-2018. Generally,fees are paid by developers or other applicants when tree preservation goals are not met. STAFF CONTACT: Gary Packan Director of Parks and Recreation 940-349-7460 garypackan(c�,cityo fdenton.com Julie Anderson KDB Program Manager 940-349-8739 Julie.andersonkcityofdenton.com Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-184 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Report for the period ending September 30, 2018. BACKGROUND: Attached for your review is the Quarterly Financial Report for the period ending September 30, 2018. If you have any questions or need additional information,please let me know. STAFF CONTACT: Antonio Puente, Jr., Chief Financial Officer (940) 349-7283 Antonio.Puente@cityofdenton.com 0RGAIM l i z EXCEL I r 'j 2017-18 FOURTH QUARTER -f FINANCIAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2018 , � I r� ECONOMI DEVEL PM , SASE, LI LE I b M1IL, -FRIENDLY MUNIj. - CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 01* SUS' IN_ABLE >7"E°NL NTAC T E VAR 11 P About This Quarterly Financial Report This report has been prepared by the City of Denton's Finance Department. The Quarterly Financial Report is intended to provide our users (internal and external) with information regarding the City's financial position and economic activity. This report includes information for the quarter ending September 30, 2018. This report is presented in six sections. 1 . The Executive Dashboard section contains a high level summary of the major operating funds using graphic illustrations and key economic indicators. Narrative disclosures are also included to highlight any significant changes or fluctuations. 2. The Financial Summary section reports the performance of the major operating funds of the City. In addition, the report provides an end of year projection and a comparison to the budget for major revenue sources and expenditure items. 3. The Revenue & Economic Analysis section provides additional analysis regarding key revenue sources and economic indicators. 4. The Quarterly Investment Report provides a summary of the City's investment portfolio, interest earnings and a brief market outlook. 5. The Performance Report provides Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for each of the goals identified in the City's strategic plan. In addition, the progress on Key Action Steps are highlighted. 2 The Quarterly Financial Report is intended to provide our users with timely and relevant information. Please provide us with any comments or suggestions you may have. If you would like additional information, feel free to contact me. Antonio Puente, Jr Chief Financial Officer 215 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 940-349-8260 3 r R �n 0 Be Joyful, Denton Festival Foundation at Quakertown Park 4 Section 1 City of Denton Quarterly Financial Report September 2018 Executive Dashboards 5 City of Denton, Texas Y General Fund Executive Dashboard ��`0F � DENTON FY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 ANNUAL PRELIMINARY FY 2017-18 Revenue & Expenses (in Millions) DES C RIPTIO N BUDGET' AC TUALS VARIANCE ■YTD Revenue ■YTD Expenses Beginning Fund Balance $140 as of 09/30/17 $ 28.17 $ 31.77 RESOURCES: $120 Ad Valorem Taxes 44.87 44.86 0% Sales Tax 39.45 38.27 -3% $100 Franchise Fees 4.98 4.98 0% Other Taxes 0.49 0.49 0% $80 Service Fees 7.96 7.52 -6% Fines and Fees 3.71 3.52 -5% $60 Licenses and Permits 3.75 3.74 0% Miscellaneous Revenue 2.10 2.02 4% Transfers In 16.04 16.31 2% $40 Total Revenues 123.35 121.71 -1% $20 Total Resources 151.52 153.48 EXPENDITURES: $- Personal Service 84.14 83.15 -1% l y by IN ti� N ti� ti00 ti% ti% ti% Material and Supplies 3.16 2.68 -15% �aa Maintenance and Repairs 3.10 2.72 -12% Insurance 1.21 1.21 0% Miscellaneous 1.16 1.10 -5% Sales Tax Monthly Average by Quarter Operations 14.84 15.46 4% $3.5 Transfers Out 15.86 16.31 3% Fixed Assets 0.56 0.62 11% $3.0 Total Expenditures 124.03 123.25 -1% Net Income (Loss) (0.68) (1.54) $2.5 Ending Fund Balance $ 27.49 $ 30.23 $2.0 KeV Trends $1.5 ➢Sales Tax revenues are$1.18M lower than expected. $1.0 ➢Service Fees revenues are$0.44M lower than expected mainly due to Ambulance Service Fees and Recreation Service Fees. $0.5 ➢Personal Service expenditures are$0.99M lower than expected due to position savings. ➢Operations expenditures are$0.62M higher than expected mainly due to Chapter 380 agreements. $_ i L� ti� tiU ti� ti� ti� ti� tit tit ti� ti1b Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget was p: p: 0= o= o= 0= O� O� o= Oo- O� $125,401,473 for expenditures.Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY a t 2017-18 budget process. Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. 6 IOCity of Denton, Texas CITY F Electric Fund Executive Dashboard • ' - - DE N T O N ANNUAL PRELI O17-18 MINARY ITY 2017-18 DESCRIPTION BUDGET' ACTUALS VARIANCE Revenue & Expenses(in Millions) Beginning Working Capital $250 and Reserves as of 9/30/17 $ 72.51 $ 76.94 RESOURCES: $200 Rate Revenues 142.25 156.49 10% Transmission Revenue 34.91 34.23 -2% $150 Other Revenues 6.01 7.06 17% Total Revenues 183.17 197.78 8% $100 Total Resources 255.68 274.72 EXPENDITURES: $50 Purchased Power 67.51 79.98 18% DEC Fuel 9.05 2.17 -76% $0 Transmission of Power 5.58 11.94 114% N� ti� NA Nlb NO. N'b NIb No. No. No. 110. Nw Personnel Service 19.15 16.25 -15% po` �o° oe� -1a11 yea, 40 PQ` 40 'o' '� Poi le Operation and Maintenance 25.04 21.58 -14% ■YTD Revenue ■YTD Expense Debt Service 34.36 34.36 0% Transfers Out 12.36 11.97 -3% 2013-2018 Historical Quarterly GWH Sales Capital Outlay 24.11 25.04 4% 600 Total Expenditures 197.16 203.29 3% Net Income (Loss) (13.99) (5.51) 500 Ending Working Capital and Reserves $ 58.52 $ 71.43 400 300 TrendsKey 200 ➢Revenues are 8%higher than budgeted. Rate Revenues are$14.2 million higher than budgeted. TCOS Revenue is$0.7 million less than budgeted. ➢Purchased Power and DEC Fuel expenditures combined is$5.6 million more than budgeted. 100 ➢Transmission of Power is$6.4 million higher than expected due to a TCOS adjustment. ➢Operations and Maintenance expenditures are 14%or$3.5 million less than budgeted as a result of licenses,consultants,. 0 attorney fees,travel and training,and advertising expenditures being lower than expected. A budget amendment was 1Q13 3Q13 1Q14 3Q14 1Q15 3Q15 1Q16 3Q16 1Q17 3g17 1Q18 3Q18 approved in the final fiscal year quarter in the amount of$24 million to cash fund the CIP and is included in Capital Outlay. ➢As of 9/30/18,preliminary working capital was$16.26 million,and the rate stabilization reserve was$55.17 million. ➢Additionally,Electric had an over collected Energy Cost Adjustment(ECA)of$4.1 million. 'Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to City Council.Approved year-end budget was$204,903,753 for Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. expenditures.Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 7 City of Denton, Texas gar Water Fund Executive Dashboard DENTONFY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 ANNUAL PRELIMINARY FY 2017-18 Revenue & Expenses(in Millions) DESCRIPTION BUDGET 1 AC TUALS VARIANCE $60 Beginning Working Capital $50 and Reserves as of 09/30/172 $ 20.85 $ 23.34 RES O URC ES: $40 Water Sales 36.89 40.59 10% $30 Other Water Revenues 0.96 1.77 84% Transfers In 5.81 5.47 -6% $20 Impact Fee Revenue 3.76 3.75 0% $10 Total Revenues 47.42 51.58 9% S- Total Resources 68.27 74.92 NA NA N% N% N% \N% ti� Oc'� �o� Qec lac le Ile QQs �aJ >�� >J PJ� �eQ EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 10.22 9.98 -2% ■YTD Revenue ■YTD Expenses Operations, Services 10.77 9.71 -10% Capital Outlay 9.17 11.75 28% 2013-2018 Historical Quarterly Gallons Sold(in Millions) Debt Service 12.64 12.64 0% 2,500 Transfers Out 4.23 3.48 -18% Total Expenditures 47.03 47.56 1% 2,000 Net Income (Loss) 0.39 4.02 Ending Working Capital and Reserves $ 21.24 $ 27.36Key Trends 1,soo - 1,000 ➢Water Sales include $2 million in resale of raw water to Upper Trinity Water District. ➢Personal Service expenses are below budget due to position vacancies. 500 ➢Operations,Services are below budget due to reduced materials &supplies and outside services expenses. ° ➢Capital Outlay expenditures include a transfer in September of$6,878,000. 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 16 17 17 18 18 'Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to City Council.Approved year-end budget was$47,809,321 for expenditures.Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 2The Beginning Working Capital balance excludes$6.71VI of Impact Fee Reserves and$0.25 million for Development Plan Line Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. Reserves. 8 City of Denton, Texas R � timmomWastewater Fund Executive Dashboard I ' _ D E 1 \ T o 1 \ FY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 ANNUAL ANNUAL FY 2017-18 DESCRIPTION BUDGET" PROJECTION VARIANCE Revenue & Expenses (in Millions) Beginning Working Capital and Reserves as of 09/30/172 $ 15.93 $ 17.86 $ao RESOURCES: $35 Wastewater Fees 24.23 25.25 4% $30 Other Wastewater Revenue 1.78 1.93 8% $25 Drainage Fees 4.65 4.79 3% $20 Transfer In 0.66 0.66 0% $15 Impact Fee Revenue 2.00 2.00 0% $10 Total Revenues 33.32 34.63 4% $s LE Total Resources 49.25 52.49 $_ EXPENDITURES: Oe ti^ tit ti� ti`b tis' ti� ti� ti� ti� \tip ti� tis'ti °, e� ac e`o a�, Q�, �aa oc �o �� eQ Personal Service 7.62 7.43 -2% o ' l `s P ' P h Operations, Services 8.24 7.17 -13% ■YTD Revenue ■YTD Expenses Capital Outlay 7.10 8.63 22% Debt Service 7.17 7.17 0% 2013 2018 Historical Quarterly Gallons Billed(in Millions) Transfer Out 3.20 3.18 -1% 1,400 Total Expenditures 33.33 33.58 1% 1,200 Net Income (Loss) (0.01) 1.05 1,000 Ending Working Capital 800 and Reserves $ 15.92 $ 18.91 600 Key 400 • 200 ➢Operations,Services are under budget due to lower materials&supplies and outside 0 services costs. 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q 1Q 3Q ➢Capital Outlay expenditures include a transfer in September of$4,238,650, of which 16 17 17 18 18 $925,000 was related to higher than anticipated drainage fees. 'Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to City Council.Approved year-end budget was$34,023,041 for expenditures.Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 2The Beginning Working Capital balance excludes$2.2 million of Impact Fee Reserves,$1.0 million for Drainage Reserves, Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. and$0.33 million for Development Plan Line Reserves. 9 --- City of Denton, Texas CITY OF Drainage Operations Executive Dashboard r`� DENTON FY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 Revenue & Expenses (in Millions) ANNUAL PRELIMINARY FY 2017-18 DESCRIPTION BUDGET' ACTUALS VARIANCE $6.0 REVENUES: Residential Drainage Fees $ 1.79 $ 1.82 2% Nonresidential Drainage Fees 2.86 2.97 4% $s.o Wastewater Resources 0.10 - -100% General Fund Transfer 0.42 0.42 0% $4.0 Total Revenues 5.17 5.21 1% $3.0 EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 1.55 1.52 -2% $2.0 Operations, Services 0.76 0.57 -25% Capital Outlay 1.56 1.86 19% Debt Service 0.68 0.68 0% $i.o Transfer Out 0.62 0.58 -6�% $_ m Total Expenditures 5.17 5.21 1 /o � � � � � � �;� cti cti �;� �;� �;� a'� o oy �ti ti Net Income (Loss) $ - $ - o` �o oe �a Fe �a PQ �,a �o Po qq ■YTD Revenue ■YTD Expenses Key Trends ➢Operations, Services are under budget due to lower materials & supplies and outside services costs. ➢Capital Outlay expenditures include a transfer in September of$925,000. 'Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to City Council.Approved year-end budget was$5,141,036 for expenditures. Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. 10 lUI)� City of Denton, Texas F l Solid Waste Fund Executive Dashboard DENTONFY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 ANNUAL PRELIMINARY FY 2017-18 Residential Curbside Collection Tonnage DESCRIPTION BUDGET' ACTUALS VARIANCE 7,000 Beginning Working Capital 6,000 and Reserves as of 09/30/17z $ 8.15 $ 9.47 5,000 RESOURCES: 4,000 10 Collection &Disposal 32.63 32.49 0% 3,000 Recycling 0.78 0.81 4% 2,000 Other Revenue 0.70 1.49 113% Total Revenues 34.11 34.79 2% 1,000 Total Resources 42.26 44.26 0 EXPENDITURES: Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Personal Service 10.51 10.31 -2% Operations, Services 9.18 9.31 1% ■Refuse Tonnage Recycling Tonnages Capital Outlay 1.97 2.15 9% Debt Service 9.54 9.54 0% Commercial Refuse& Recycling(Front&Side Load) Transfer Out 3.74 3.66 -2% Cubic Yards Serviced per Week Total Expenditures 34.94 34.97 0% 30,000 Net Income (Loss) (0.83) (0.18) 25,000 Ending Working Capital 20,000 and Reserves $ 7.32 $ 9.29 15,000 1111 Key Trends 10,000 ti ti ti ti ti 5,000 ➢Other Revenue is greater than expected due to auction sale of equipment. ➢Capital Outlay is higher than expected due to increased transfers to capital projects. 0 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 'Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget was$39,302,768 for ■Commercial Refuse ■Commercial Recycling expenditures.Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 2The Beginning Working Capital and Reserves excludes$8.65 million of Landfill Closure/Post Closure reserves. Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. 11 City of Denton, Texas CITY OF I Airport Fund Executive Dashboard • DENTON FY 2017-18 ANNUAL PRELUMINARY FY 2017-18 - DESCRIPTION BUDGET' ACTUALS VARIANCE Beginning Working Capital GAS WELL REVENUE and Reserves as of 09/30/17 $ 2.47 $ 2.75 (in millions of dollars by fiscal year) RESOURCES: Airport Ground Leases 0.71 0.78 10% $5.0 FBO Commissions 0.20 0.29 45% N Hscellaneous 0.09 0.10 11% $4.0 Total Operating Revenues 1.00 1.17 17% EXPENDITURES: $3.0 Personal Service 0.53 0.49 -8% Operations, Services 0.41 0.25 -39% Transfer Out 0.55 0.52 -5% $2.0 Total Operating Expenditures 1.49 1.26 -15% Net Operating Income (Loss) (0.49) (0.09) $1.0 NO N-O PERATING REVENUES: Investment Income 0.03 0.07 133% $0.0 Gas Well Royalties 0.47 0.41 -13% 2016 2017 2018 Total Non-Operating Revenues 0.50 0.48 4% NO N-O PERATING EXPENDITURES Transfer Out- Capital 0.22 0.22 0% AIRPORT OPERATIONS BY QUARTER Total Non-Operating Expenditures 0.22 0.22 0% (takeoff or landing) Net Non-Operating Income (Loss) 0.28 0.26 60,000 Net Income (Loss) (0.21) 0.17 Ending Working Capital and Reserves $ 2.26 $ 2.92 50,000 TrendsKey 40,000 ➢FBO Commissions include a one-time collection of$55,000 not originally included in budget. ➢Personnel Service Expense are less than budget due to vacant positions. 30,000 ➢Operations,Services expense is less than budget due to lower that expected expenditures on Maintenance and Repair,and utilities. ➢Gas Well Royalty revenues are less than budget due to lower gas production and declining 20,000 natural gas prices. tia �a �a �a tih tih tih 4; N N tib $11n'tin:,�p an �n tin �n an �n tin �n an 'Annual adopted budget as amended or modified.Beginning Working Capital and Reserves represents the amount Note:All financial amounts presented are in millions of dollars. which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 12 CITY City of Denton, Texas OF rovement Fund Executive Dashboard :� -. DENTONStreet Imp FY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 $1s.o ANNUAL PRELIMINARY FY 2017-18 Revenue&Expenses(in Minions) DESCRIPTION BUDGET 1 AC TUALS VARIANCE Beginning Working Capital and Reserves as of 09/30/2017 $ 1.25 $ 1.16 $12.0 RESOURCES: Franchise Fees 12.47 12.74 2% $9.0 Street Cuts 0.36 0.29 -19% Investment Income 0.01 - -100% $6.0 Transfers In 1.12 1.15 3% Total Revenues 13.96 14.18 2% $3.0 Total Resources 15.21 15.34 EXPENDITURES: Oct-17 Dec-17 Feb-18 Apr-18 Jun-18 Aug-18 Personal Service 3.44 3.24 -6% .YTDRevenue .YrDr perms Materials & Supplies 0.09 0.09 0% Maintenance &Repairs 6.61 6.73 2% Tons of Asphalt Uid(in Thousands) Operations, Services 0.89 0.79 -11% 12 Transfer Out 2.93 2.87 -2% 9 Total Expenditures 13.96 13.72 -2% 6 Net Income (Loss) - 0.46 Ending Fund Balance $ 1.25 $ 1.62 3 0 +it!4 FL Qtri Qt12 Qtr3 Qtr4 TrendsKey . mm- Lane Miles Surface Treatment ➢Street Cuts are under budget due to lower utility cut repairs. 52 ➢Surface treatments for the year were scheduled in the 4th quarter. 39 ■ 26 13 0 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 ■FY 16-17 ■FY 17-18 'Annual adopted budget as amended or modified. Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. 13 l(I I City of Denton, Texas F _ r Grants Dashboard DENTON FY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 FY 2017-18 Awards & Expenses (in Millions) GRANT PRELIMINARY FY 2017-18 $120.0 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AC C TUALS VARIANCE $100.0 2017-18 Budget 1 $80.0 Comm Development $ 2.94 $ 1.24 -58% $60.0 Public Safety 0.80 0.53 -34% Transportation 95.14 20.28 -79% $40.0 Other 0.03 0.03 0% $20.0 Total Budget 98.91 22.08 -78% $- L S2 > 'A 0 > cow z w New Awards w 1 0v d � ¢ o d Comm Development 0.60 0.50 -17% Public Safety 0.69 0.52 -25% ■Awards ■Expenses Transportation 3.40 0.28 -92% Parks & Recreation 0.21 0.21 0% FY 2017-18 Grants Awarded Other 0.21 0.13 -38% PARKS&REC COMM DEV PUBLIC Total New Awards 5.11 1.64 -68% OTHER 0.21% 3.40% SAFETY 0.24% 1.42% Totals $ 104.02 $ 23.72 -77% 0 Key Trends The following grants have been received in FY 2017-18: ➢2018 SHSP SWAT Equipment Enhancement:$24,000 ➢Emergency Solutions Grant:$600,000 ➢Domestic&Sexual Violence Initiative: $225,000 ➢Federal Equitable Sharing:$31,315 ➢Organized Crime Drug Enforcement: $9,037 ➢Chapter 59 Asset Forfeitures:$169,399 ),,Transportation Projects: $3,399,191 ➢U.S.Marshals Violent Offenders Task Force:$25,663 ➢NW Trail Extension Grant:$212,273 ➢Law Enforcement Officer Education:$17,151 ➢Interlibrary Loan Program:$32,149 TRANS ➢Sexual Assault Examiners Reimbursement:$47,872 ➢TIFMAS Training Grant:$11,275 94.73% ➢2017 SHSP Ballistic Blankets: $3,000 ➢Historic Preservation-CLG Grant:$1,939 ➢2017 SHSP Night Vision:$14,200 ➢Texas Parks&Wildlife-CCNHC:$199,613 ➢2017 UASI Command Data: $30,000 ➢Body Armor Grant Program:$91,692 This grant amount will be spent over several years and the fiscal year 2017-18 projections are estimated expenditures for one year. Note: All figures presented are in millions of dollars. Remaining grant amounts will be spent in future fiscal year. 14 Section 2 City of Denton Quarterly Financial Report September 2018 This report is designed for internal use and does not include all the funds and accounts included in the City of Denton's operations. The information provided is unaudited; for a complete audited report, please refer to the City of Denton Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, available through the City's Finance Department, City Secretary's Office, or Denton Public Libraries. FINANCIAL SUMMARY 15 City of Denton General Fund Schedule of Revenues-Budget vs Actuals(Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30,2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS REVENUE DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGET' ACTUALS ACTUALS Current Year-Ad Valorem $ 43,191,856 $ 44,460,191 $ 44,411,291 0% Delinquent-Ad Valorem 192,136 100,000 127,769 28% Miscellaneous Penalties&Fees 334,007 309,285 3189650 3% Ad Valorem Taxes 43,717,999 44,869,476 44,857,710 0% Sales Tax 36,841,138 39,452,935 38,270,025 -3% Franchise-Gas Utilities 485,262 342,739 342,739 0% Franchise-Private Electric Utilities 138,651 122,750 122,750 0% Franchise-Cable 546,133 480,873 480,873 0% Franchise-Telecom 248,970 233,956 233,956 0% Franchise-Denton Municipal Utilities 4,187,833 3,804,531 3,804,531 0% Franchise Fees 5,606,849 4,984,849 4,984,849 0% Other Taxes 481,295 491,400 493,461 0% Ambulance Service Fees 3,677,533 3,380,800 3,288,454 -3% Fire Department Fees 160,241 196,000 219,715 12% Building Inspections Fees 505,954 532,247 591,916 11% Park Department Fees 1,889,115 2,298,651 1,957,227 -15% Planning Department Fees 960,030 998,065 982,744 -2% Reprographics Fees 349,048 370,160 325,501 -12% Miscellaneous Service Fees 118,306 183,015 147,805 -19% Service Fees 7,660,227 7,958,938 7,513,362 -6% Denton Municipal Fines 1,511,112 1,482,000 1,432,420 -3% Parking Fines 254,705 260,000 227,670 -12% Miscellaneous Fines and Fees 903,383 889,000 846,873 -5% Court Administrative and Service Fees 977,287 1,080,000 1,016,104 -6% Fines and Fees 3,646,487 3,711,000 3,523,067 -5% Demolition Permits 5,890 7,670 5,320 -31% Building Permits 2,889,363 3,638,055 3,638,497 0% Certificate of Occupancy 74,290 72,829 71,575 -2% Miscellaneous Licenses and Permits 47,153 32,278 24,298 -25% Licenses and Permits 3,016,696 3,750,832 3,739,690 0% Investment Income 371,305 460,600 514,938 12% Miscellaneous Revenues 1,775,486 1,635,243 1,502,402 -8% Miscellaneous Resources 2,146,791 2,095,843 2,017,340 4% ROI-Denton Municipal Utilities 7,506,361 7,987,758 8,278,398 4% Transfers 8,140,385 8,050,688 8,036,527 0% Transfers 15,646,746 16,038,446 16,314,925 2% Total General Fund Revenues $ 118,764,228 $ 123,353,719 $ 121,714,429 -1% Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget is$119,720,372. 16 City of Denton General Fund Schedule of Expenditures-Budget vs Actuals(Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30,2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS Y-T-D BUDGET' ACTUALS ACTUALS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES Building Inspections $ 2,858,490 $ 3,071,315 $ 2,796,226 -9% Community Improvement Services 1,629,488 1,564,294 1,461,586 -7% Libraries 5,710,917 6,064,112 5,742,354 -5% Parks and Recreation 12,4769932 13,971,655 13,353,602 4% Planning 3,068,235 3,415,509 29977,515 -13% Gas Well Review 168,703 393,026 407,229 4% Social Services 567,064 6299738 639,312 2% 26,4799829 29,109,649 27,377,824 -6% PUBLIC SAFETY Animal Services 1,407,977 1,559,205 19531,051 -2% Fire 26,4929706 28,876,353 29,570,384 2% Municipal Court 1,290,483 1,381,702 19233,130 -11% Municipal Judge 381,877 436,124 403,188 -8% Police 29,253,126 32,297,806 319583,773 -2% 58,8269169 64,551,190 64,321,526 0% TRANSPORTATION Traffic Operations 1,931,432 4,0429028 39975,051 -2% Transportation Operations 478,853 796,658 626,389 -21% Street Lighting 787,441 755,000 801,318 6% 3,197,726 5,593,686 5,402,758 -3% ADMINISTRATIVE&COMMUNITY SERVICES Cable Television 301,806 3239271 315,519 -2% City Manager's Office 2,661,176 2,829,303 2,994,797 6% Economic Development 3,876,800 3,3539387 39435,777 2% Facilities Management 4,011,319 4,324,642 4,111,625 -5% Finance 2,811,695 3,0749420 29991,561 -3% Human Resources 1,580,740 1,755,865 1,755,565 0% Internal Audit 137,540 2639381 370,105 41% Legal Administration 2,115,591 29453,772 2,038,336 -17% Public Communications Office 457,378 4959021 410,946 -17% Reprographics 425,021 433,646 374,981 -14% Non-Departmental 8,280,513 5,472,186 79346,011 34% 26,6599579 24,778,894 26,145,223 6% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 115,163,303 $ 124,033,419 $ 123,247,331 -1% 'Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget is$125,401,473. 17 City of Denton Electric Fund Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures -Budget vs Actuals (Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30, 2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGETt ACTUALS ACTUALS Beginning Working Capital and Reserves as of 9/30/17 $ 72,510,304 $ 76,942,756 REVENUES: Rate Revenues $ 140,995,087 142,247,739 156,488,941 6% Transmission Revenues 18,152,139 34,909,157 34,231,935 70% Other Revenues 13,488,124 6,010,620 7,061,136 21% Total Revenues 172,635,350 183,167,516 197,782,012 14% EXPENDITURES: Purchased Power 88,843,097 67,509,516 79,982,427 4% DEC Fuel - 9,051,826 2,169,444 28% Transmission of Power 4,217,800 5,578,948 11,940,988 114% Personnel Services 15,830,362 19,151,317 16,253,725 -19% Materials and Supplies 825,429 1,268,680 992,390 -40% Maintenance and Repair 800,701 1,394,600 701,778 -49% Insurance 50,033 719,596 703,503 0% Return on Investment 5,405,518 5,767,985 5,991,680 4% Franchise Fee 7,717,675 8,239,978 8,554,188 4% Miscellaneous 446,459 674,305 491,054 -62% Operations 4,756,419 6,979,701 4,140,379 -52% Debt Service 29,141,890 34,360,369 34,364,908 0% Interfund Transfers 10,934,687 12,357,797 11,971,526 -5% Capital Outlay 1,147,964 24,105,000 25,036,734 0% Total Expenditures 170,118,034 197,159,618 203,294,724 -1% Net Income(Loss) $ 2,517,316 (13,992,102) (5,512,712) Ending Working Capital and Reserves $ 58,518,202 $ 71,430,044 1 Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget was$204,903,753 for expenditures. Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 18 City of Denton Water Fund Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures-Budget vs Actuals(Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30,2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGET ACTUALS ACTUALS Beginning Working Capital and Reserves as of 09/30/171 $ 20,851,375 $ 23,340,901 REVENUES: Water Sales Residential $ 17,504,928 18,585,215 20,300,407 9% Water Sales Commercial 15,707,766 16,575,408 17,483,857 5% Water for Resale 1,301,603 1,719,330 2,812,263 64% Other Water 1,433,508 800,099 1,448,887 81% Transfers In 5,476,269 5,808,155 5,466,087 -6% Investment Income 223,638 174,000 319,526 84% Impact Fee Revenue 4,000,000 3,755,404 3,755,404 0% Total Revenues 45,647,712 47,417,611 51,586,431 9% EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 9,587,107 10,217,907 9,975,274 -2% Purchased Power 1,221,663 1,561,851 1,340,181 -14% Purchase of Water - - 1,857 - Materials and Supplies 1,513,730 1,686,976 1,695,733 1% Maintenance and Repairs 1,448,707 1,373,808 1,224,639 -11% Insurance 80,817 219,101 222,481 2% Miscellaneous 319,007 338,969 254,174 -25% Operations,Services 1,865,774 2,413,496 1,634,402 -32% Capital Outlay 12,906,384 9,167,403 11,749,877 28% Return on Investment 1,213,302 1,316,982 1,376,185 4% Franchise Fee 1,733,289 1,859,180 1,965,981 6% Debt Service 11,195,411 12,638,094 12,638,093 0% Transfers Out 3,611,755 4,231,917 3,482,633 -18% Total Expenditures 46,696,946 47,025,684 47,561,510 1% Net Income(Loss) $ (1,049,234) 391,927 4,024,921 Ending Working Capital and Reserves $ 21,243,302 $ 27,365,822 1 The Beginning Working Capital balance excludes$6,650,271 of Impact Fee Reserves and$250,000 for Development Plan Line Reserves. 2 Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget was$47,809,321 for expenditures. Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 19 City of Denton Wastewater Fund Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures-Budget vs Actuals(Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30,2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGET' ACTUALS ACTUALS Beginning Worldng Capital and Reserves as of 09/30/17' $ 15,926,057 $ 17,861,887 REVENUES: Residential Fees $ 11,655,664 11,030,267 12,199,424 11% Commercial Fees 12,207,762 12,450,498 12,336,480 -1% Effluent Irrigation Fees 103,593 67,076 119,802 79% Wholesale Fees 631,996 686,659 590,985 -14% Other Wastewater Fees 1,894,464 1,659,542 1,688,037 2% Drainage Fees 4,645,817 4,649,762 4,782,259 3% Transfer In 920,819 659,030 659,030 0% Investment Income 170,898 117,500 254,222 116% Impact Fee Reserves 3,520,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 0% Total Revenues 35,751,013 33,320,334 34,630,239 4% EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 7,232,290 7,622,072 7,434,742 -2% Purchased Power 987,482 1,020,000 1,028,092 1% Materials and Supplies 1,077,202 1,235,111 1,010,518 -18% Maintenance and Repairs 1,180,377 1,433,129 1,132,435 -21% Insurance 28,312 180,492 180,492 0% Miscellaneous 49,129 53,551 42,141 -21% Operations,Services 1,917,683 2,124,260 1,567,762 -26% Capital Outlay 11,2079727 7,104,424 8,633,897 22% Return on Investment 887,541 9029791 9109533 1% Franchise Fee 1,267,915 19289,702 193009761 1% Debt Service 6,815,945 79167,280 791669884 0% Transfers Out 3,232,591 39196,398 391769251 -1% Total Expenditures 35, , 1% Net Income(Loss) $ (133,181) (8,876) 1,045,731 Ending Worldng Capital and Reserves $ 1599179181 $ 1899079618 1 The Beginning Worldng Capital balance excludes$2,194,686 of Impact Fee Reserves,$1,000,000 for Drainage Reserves, and$335,000 for Development Plan Line Reserves. 'Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget was$34,023,041 for expenditures. Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 20 City of Denton Drainage Operations Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures-Budget vs Actuals(Unaudited) For the Period Ended Sep 30,2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGET' ACTUALS ACTUALS REVENUES: Residential Drainage Fees $ 1,762,980 $ 1,788,253 $ 1,816,999 2% Nonresidential Drainage Fees 2,882,837 2,861,509 2,965,262 2% Wastewater Resources 13,913 100,000 - -100% General Fund Transfer 501,336 424,030 424,030 0% Total Revenues 5,161,066 5,173,792 5,206,291 1% EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 1,453,432 1,537,953 1,522,588 2% Materials and Supplies 45,991 82,120 51,318 -18% Maintenance and Repairs 82,066 122,200 85,974 -14% Insurance 2,992 25,461 25,461 0% Miscellaneous 16,158 16,000 9,221 -42% Operations,Services 341,028 531,509 392,818 0% Capital Outlay 1,989,444 1,555,786 1,863,499 5% Debt Service 636,372 677,790 676,769 0% Transfer Out 593,583 624,973 578,643 4% Total Expenditures 5,161,066 5,173,792 5,206,291 1% Net Income(Loss) $ - $ - $ - Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council. Approved year-end budget was$5,141,036 for expenditures. 21 City of Denton Solid Waste Fund Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures-Budget vs Actuals(Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30,2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGET ACTUALS ACTUALS Beginning Working Capital and Reserves as of 09/30/171 $ 8,151,875 $ 9,468,891 REVENUES: Garbage Fees-Residential $ 11,173,109 10,794,542 10,757,335 0% Garbage Fees-Commercial 14,884,430 15,365,434 15,550,202 1% Landfill Fees 6,249,179 6,330,540 6,057,188 4% Materials Processing 131,253 133,972 124,719 -7% Recycling and Public Outreach 872,049 778,450 814,110 5% Site Operations 208,259 206,729 127,636 -38% Other Revenue 529,852 444,749 1,297,383 192% Investment Income 29,830 53,000 63,308 19% Total Revenues 34,077,961 34,107,416 34,791,881 2% EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 10,423,461 10,507,490 10,317,660 -2% Materials and Supplies 401,553 301,495 224,887 -25% Maintenance and Repairs 409,889 364,877 212,333 -42% Insurance 94,952 233,631 233,631 0% Miscellaneous 62,659 67,859 60,163 -11% Operations,Services 6,123,163 5,363,512 5,695,984 6% Capital Outlay 1,914,843 1,970,000 2,146,941 9% Debt Service 8,059,706 9,542,116 9,543,240 0% Franchise Fee 1,687,618 1,702,293 1,737,792 2% Landfill Closure 1,198,301 1,143,059 1,143,059 0% Transfer Out 2,580,719 3,740,685 3,657,201 -2% Total Expenditures 32,956,864 34,937,017 34,972,891 0% Net Income(Loss) $ 1,121,097 (829,601) (181,010) Ending Working Capital and Reserves $ 7,322,274 $ 9,287,881 The Beginning Working Capital Reserve excludes$8,654,114 Landfill Closure/Post Closure Reserves. 2 Annual budget reflects year-end estimate presented to the City Council.Approved year-end budget was$39,302,768 for expenditures. Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-18 budget process. 22 City of Denton Airport Fund Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures -Budget vs Actuals (Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30,2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGETt ACTUALS ACTUALS Beginning Working Capital and Reserves as of 09/30/17 $ 2,471,421 $ 2,748,875 OPERATING REVENUES: Airport Ground Leases $ 584,700 713,154 778,054 9% FBO Commissions 208,931 199,808 291,467 46% Miscellaneous 95,524 92,619 114,802 24% Total Operating Revenues 889,155 1,005,581 1,184,323 18% OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 519,113 530,482 485,569 -8% Materials and Supplies 26,196 46,700 45,717 -2% Maintenance and Repairs 56,987 105,193 25,705 -76% Insurance 7,025 21,823 21,823 0% Miscellaneous 1,024 1,200 449 -63% Operations 190,267 238,160 161,653 -32% Transfers Out-Operating 470,222 547,070 519,841 -5% Total Operating Expenses 1,270,834 1,490,628 1,260,757 -15% Operating(Loss) (381,679) (485,047) (76,434) NON-OPERATING REVENUES: Investment Income 42,244 25,000 65,183 161% Gas Well Royalties 606,518 474,130 410,692 -13% Total Non-Operating Revenues 648,762 499,130 47.5,87.5 -5% NON-OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Transfers Out-Capital - 225,000 225,000 0% Total Non-Operating Expenses - 225,000 225,000 0% Non-Operating Income(Loss) 648,762 274,130 250,875 Net Income(Loss) $ 267,083 (210,917) 174,441 Ending Working Capital $ 2,260,504 $ 2,923,316 1 Annual adopted budget as amended or modified.Beginning Working Capital and Reserves represents the amount which was estimated i 2017-18 budget process. 23 City of Denton Street Improvement Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget vs Actuals (Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30, 2018 PRIOR ANNUAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET VS DESCRIPTION Y-T-D BUDGET' ACTUALS ACTUALS Beginning Working Capital and reserves as of 9/30/2017 $ 1,253,048 $ 1,158,667 REVENUES: Franchise Fees $ 11,097,869 12,476,060 12,743,755 2% Street Cuts 240,099 357,000 292,517 -18% Investment Income 14,294 10,000 933 -91% Transfers In 1,023,161 1,118,135 1,149,075 3% Miscellaneous 200,835 - 1,505 Total Revenues 12,576,258 13,961,195 14,187,785 2% EXPENDITURES: Personal Service 2,930,142 3,439,984 3,241,181 -6% Materials and Supplies 107,153 87,150 85,055 -2% Maintenance and Repairs 8,631,040 6,620,524 6,734,599 2% Insurance 8,649 51,693 51,693 0% Miscellaneous 3,609 5,000 4,320 -14% Operations,Services 742,117 830,302 736,304 -1 l% Transfer Out 727,176 2,926,542 2,869,873 -2% Fixed Assets 66,329 - - Total Expenditures 13,216,215 13,961,195 13,723,025 -2% Net Income(Loss) $ (639,957) - 464,760 Ending Fund Balance $ 1,253,048 $ 1,623,427 lAnnual adopted budget as amended or modified.Beginning Fund Balance represents the amount which was estimated in the FY 2017-11 24 City of Denton Grants Schedule of Expenses - Budget vs Preliminary Actuals (Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30, 2018 EXPENDITURE S AS OF ANNUAL PRELIMINIAR BUDGET VS GRANT DESCRIPTION 9/30/20172 BUDGET Y ACTUALS ACTUALS FY 2017-18 Budget US Dept of HUD - Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) $ 2,775,354 $ 1,893,649 $ 735,862 -61% US Dept of HUD - HOME Investment Partnership Program 2,816,384 1,046,759 503,978 -52% Community Development' 5,591,738 2,940,408 1,239,840 -58% TxDot STEP Comprehensive Grant - 91,464 74,805 -18% 2016 UASI - 130,000 130,000 0% 2017 UASI - 98,200 96,962 -1% Emergency Management Performance Grant - 46,825 - -100% 2016 Tobacco Enforcement Grant - 7,350 - -100% Staffing for Adequate Fire & Emergency Response - 419,971 225,381 -46% Public Safety - 793,810 527,148 -34% Airport Maintenance (RAMP) Grant - 50,000 49,995 0% TxDot-RTR-Mayhill Rd-I1135 E to US 380 14,203,683 33,197,821 14,315,161 -57% TxDot-RTR-Bonnie Brae Rd-I1135 E to US 377 9,189,164 39,579,553 4,527,476 -89% County-Traffic Signal-US 380-Cindy Lane - 53,865 - -100% TxDot-IH35E at Loop 288/Lillian Miller Pkwy - 37,000 - -100% TxDot-RTR-McKinney (Formerly FM426) 138 18,267,303 1,308,511 -93% TxDot-Hickory Creek FM2181-FM2499 2,294 2,397,706 75,279 -97% Project - 55,898 - -100% Bicycle & Pedestrian Projects Grant - 1,500,000 - -100% Transportation' 23,395,279 95,139,146 20,276,422 -79% Interlibrary Loan Program (ILL) - 25,000 25,000 0% TIFMAS Training Tuition Grant - 10,000 10,000 0% Other - 35,000 35,000 0% Total FY 2017-18 Budget 28,987,017 98,908,364 22,078,410 -78% New Awards Emergency Solutions Grant - 600,000 506,879 -16% Community Development - 600,000 506,879 -16% Federal Equitable Sharing - 31,315 31,315 0% Chapter 59 Asset Forfeitures - 169,399 169,399 0% U.S. Marshals Violent Offenders Task Force - 25,663 25,663 0% PD-Law Enforcement Officer Standards & Education - 17,151 17,151 0% Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANE) Reimbursement - 47,872 47,872 0% 2017 SHSP Ballistic Blankets - 3,000 3,000 0% 2017 SHSP Night Vision - 14,200 14,171 0% 2017 UASI - 30,000 - -100% Body Armor Grant Program - 91,692 - -100% 2018 SHSP SWAT Equipment Enhancement - 24,000 - -100% Domestic and Sexual Violence Initiative Grant - 225,000 204,202 -9% Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force - 9,037 9,037 0% Public Safety - 688,329 521,810 -24.19% 25 City of Denton Grants Schedule of Expenses - Budget vs Preliminary Actuals (Unaudited) For the Period Ended September 30, 2018 EXPENDITURE S AS OF ANNUAL PRELIMINIAR BUDGET VS GRANT DESCRIPTION 9/30/20172 BUDGET Y ACTUALS ACTUALS TxDot-N TX Blvd Roundabout 11,805 1,988,195 2,187 -100% TxDot-RTR-ITS COMM Trunk Line 253,372 1,318,228 185,010 -86% TxDot-US 77 At Nicosia Street - 49,533 49,533 0% TxDot-FM 2499 At State School Road - 21,597 21,597 0% TxDot-FM 2499 At Unicorn Lake - 21,638 21,491 -1% Transportation' 265,177 3,399,191 279,818 -92% TxDot NW Trail Extension Grant 1,086,685 212,273 212,273 0% Parks and Recreations 1,086,685 212,273 212,273 0% Interlibrary Loan Program (ILL) - 7,149 7,149 0% TIFMAS Training Tuition Grant - 1,275 1,275 0% Historic Preservation-Certified Local Government (CLG) Grant - 1,939 1,939 0% Texas Parks & Wildlife-CCNHC-Davis Trailhead & Trail - 199,613 113,670 -43.05% Others - 209,976 124,033 -41% Total New Awards 1,351,862 5,109,769 1,644,813 -68% TOTALS $ 30,338,879 $ 104,018,133 $ 23,723,223 -77% 'This grant amount will be spent over several years and the fiscal year 2017-18 projections are just estimated expenditure in the one year. Remaining grant amounts will be spent in future fiscal year. 2 A portion of the grants presented cover multiple years. 26 Section 3 City of Denton Quarterly Financial Report September 2018 REVENUE & ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 27 Revenue & Economic Analysis Summary The data included in this section provides information on local, state and national trends impacting the City's financial position. The following notes are provided to facilitate this section's readability. 1 . Positive Outlook — Represents favorable conditions for the local economy. Color code — Green. 2. Cautious Outlook — Represents changing conditions that require close monitoring. Color code — Yellow. 3. Negative Outlook — Represents unfavorable conditions for the local economy. Color code — Red. The data included in this section have been obtained from a variety of sources. Sales tax and construction related data have been obtained from internal city departments. Economic data for the State have been obtained from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and may be subject to availability. National economic data were compiled with assistance from the City's investment advisor, First Southwest Asset Management. 28 FirstSouthwest f� AssetManagement National Economic Trends A Hilltop Holdings Company. Period Ending September 30, 2018 Gross Domestic Product(GDP Gross Domestic Product The initial reading of third quarter GDP Quarterly Annualized Percentage Change showed that economic growth had slowed from +4.2% in the second quarter to +3.5%. The consumer spending component was solid 510 - - Historical Avq.3.296 --- — W-- - - --- - - -- - at+4.0%,but trade subtracted 1.8 percentage a.z points from the overall Q3 number as imports 3.o Z soared while exports fell. Obviously, this 3.0 •_. •-•_ _• -_••••••.•-._..._•_•_ • _- - _ 's __- •_ • --•.. reflects the trade war ...which has since •i:a Lo 2.3 2.2 escalated significantly in the fourth quarter. 1.0 1's Inventory accumulation added 2.1 percentage t.o �'-'-0:a -- "- -"' --' --' '-•... "'- ' points to the overall number. This is a volatile 0.0 component;it's quite possible that inventories will reduce fourth quarter growth.Again,this t.o W_....._._._........................................................._..................__.____.________.___.____._.____._._._.._.___ __ could be trade war related as U.S. businesses -z.o .---....---_._................._............._.______.__....._._..._______..............._.____........................_............._._._... boosted inventories ahead of tariff m 3 '9 ; a implementation. When inventories are P W m removed, third quarter "real final sales" rose Source,us census Bureau,Bwaneero by just +1.4%, compared to +5.4% in the second quarter. Nonfarm Payrolls The September employment report was an housand �ChangeinNon-FarmPayroNs —o—Unemplaym tRenate � e oddly mixed bag. The ADP private payroll aao ....................._........_.._..•.. W.......... ........_.W.........._- ------. ....... ._W.. - 8.0 324 report,released two days earlier,had hinted at 286 75 some upside risk to payrolls. But the official 7.0 Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) release i3o Zti ua 208 showed nonfarm payrolls missed the +185k 200 175 izs f5s.. 1` t' 6'5 median forecast with only +134k new jobs Q118 60 9 added in September. However, the previous Z lao ° two months were revised higher by a Zto 5's Z combined+87k. ...that's both a big miss and o s.o a big revision. Although some hurricane Q a.a T related distortion seems likely,the BLS said it as a.z a.l a.t a.l a i a.l a.i as is not possible to quantify the net effect on 4.0 payrolls. The last three months have seen payrolls grow by a healthy +190k per month a H o z o d a > average. In the separate household survey,the ,. unemployment rate fell from 3.9% to 3.7%, pushing the 49-year low just a little bit lower. Source:Bureau of Labor Statistics/Bloomberg 29 Inflation Inflation seems to have peaked. Both the Inflation Indicators(Year-Over-Year Percent Change) headline consumer price index (CPI) and 35 ............ �CPfAgRems tCPKore -4-PCE-Cae 35 core CPI rose by just +0.1% in September, below the median forecasts. On a year-over- year basis, headline CPI slipped from a 2.5 ..................-_..........._ ------------ _ ._ _ ... ....._.. 25 +2.7% pace to +2.3%, while the core was unchanged at +2.2%. Although a slight deceleration in the upward trend of housing is 1.5 costs and a drop in vehicle prices were major factors in the lukewarm September report, prices on many goods (including beef,pork, 0.5 _ _. ... ... _ 0.5 chicken, fruits and vegetables, major appliances, drugs, alcohol and medical o.0 0.0 services)were stagnant or falling. as -- _____ __•_-•_•_ ________•-_•W_• _________•-_.-_.-___ -0.5 The F however, more interested in the c A Rze m A 3a3c` c_ > A Q z 0 V 3s3c` c`_ c � Fed, er, 1S e W 9 < ? ' = < ' 9 personal consumption expenditures (PCE) P P P P Qi V V v V V V V V V J V V W 00 OD 4 W 4 rb core index which continues to hover just Source Bureau of Labor Stattw(Bureau of Economic Analysts Blomberg below the 2.0%mark. Retail Sales Consumer spending has been puzzlingly Retail Sales%Change sluggish given the elevated levels of Retail Sates Month-over-Month —Retail Sales Year-Over-Year consumer confidence. September retail &00 ._..._._---_._------------------___---_-__---___..______---._____---_-----------------_----------------_----_____.- sales, expected to climb+0.5%,instead rose Too -- -- ----------- --------------- by just+0.1%for the second straight month. 6.u0 ..........................................................................._..._......_..._..._..._._.-'-`_ ..._..._..._..._•'•---------_---_ _-... . ._---- The weakness was primarily attributed to a sharp drop in food services and drinking 5.OWO ._...________..._..._. .. _._._................_......... .................. ._.___..._.-. _ .__......................... .-. places, some of which may be hurricane 4.00 ._-------------__. ..----------__--------- ___._.__..._._... ._..._.__.__.__.__.__ __._..._.-._.-._.-.-.___..__--__. related. Sales ex autos and gas also fell short 3.00 .... ---------------------------------------- -- ------- ---- ----- -- --— of forecasts. However, the control group measure (which feeds into GDP) beat 2.00 ...................._.........................._..._...__._..._..._..._..._..._......................................._..._..._......__._.................................................. forecasts fora +0.4% gain by rising +0.5% 1.00 ...although August data was revised a tenth 0.00 t a '�. lower to 0.0%. Ignoring all the noise, the key takeaway is that after four straight o R g ° c F 9 ; t w a R q o ; P M months with headline retail sales growing at better than 6% on a year-over-year basis, Source US Census Bureau 6winberg sales slowed to+4.7%in September. 30 Texas Home Sales Texas home sales fell-5.4% in the TexasMeftnGty Home Sales(NSA) third quarter, but were still up +3.9% 400 2200 375 on a year-over-year basis. The 350 average Texas home price in 325 „,D September was $281k, a +4.2% 30.0 .� / increase over the previous year, but 27.5 below the record high of$298.2 set ns ! �1/ '� three months earlier. . 20.0 I '1 17.5 1. 4 ; In Denton County, unit home sales t5,0 ' fell by-7.5% during the summer 25 - quarter, and fell-7% over the same 00l _7X,,, SO, period a year ago. The average home 75 --O"ImChWneS" 2M 50 —L—(T S#"1 price in September was $348.2k, a 2.5 `° (0"bm eh how Srasl +5.8%year-over-year increase, but oo� •300 below the record high of$367.9 set two months earlier. County home N N N N W W W W C A p L qi N N N 0 � O� Ot V V J J W Of pp listings in September were 3,918, approximately +41% higher than two years earlier. The available inventory (in months) was 3.2 months at quarter end; a substantial increase from 2.2 six months earlier. The paper was prepared by FirstSouthwest Asset Management,is intended for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice,nor is it an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment or other specific product.Information provided in this paper was obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable;however,it is not guaranteed to be correct,complete,or current,and is not intended to imply or establish standards of care applicable to any attorney or advisor in any particular circumstances.The statements within constitute the views of FirstSouthwest Asset Management as of the date of the report and may differ from the views of other divisions/departments of Hilltop Securities.In addition,the views are subject to change without notice.This paper represents historical information only and is not an indication of future performance. 31 Fuel Prices I Outlook I Cautious Description: Quarterly fuel trends for the United States and Texas. Analysis: Fuel prices are a major commodity source in the economy. Studies have shown a positive effect on disposable income levels when fuel prices decrease. It is estimated that for every penny decrease in the price of fuel, $1.3 billion is available to the consumer for disposable income. Therefore,the price of fuel is likely to be a key predictor of sales tax collections. Fuel prices showed a 0.2% decrease from the prior quarter at the national level and a 1.3%decrease at the state level. Staff has rated this outlook as Cautious. Fuel Prices uSales Tax —Texas Fuel Prices —US Fuel Prices $4.00 $12 $3.50 $10 $3.00 $8 $2.50 N L � c $2.00 $6 2 C � $1.50 $4 $1.00 $2 $0.50 $0.00 $0 4Q'14 2Q'15 4Q'15 2Q'16 4Q'16 2Q'17 4Q'17 2Q'18 4Q'18 Source: U.S. Department of Energy 32 Municipal Cost Index I Outlook Description: The Municipal Cost Index was developed to show the rate of inflation for the cost of goods purchased frequently by local governments. The MCI draws on the monthly statistical data collected by the U.S. Departments of Commerce and Labor as well as independently compiled data to project a composite cost picture for the municipal budget officer or operating department manager. Costs of labor, materials and contract services are all factored into the composite MCI. Major indicators of these items used for the MCI include the Consumer Price Index, the Wholesale Price Index for Industrial Commodities (now known as the Producer Price Index) and the construction cost indexes published by the U.S. Department of Commerce, respectively. Analysis: The Municipal Cost Index (MCI) pulls a variety of prices for frequently purchased commodities for local governments. The cost for labor, materials and contract services are factored for the MCI. An increase in MCI means the overall price mix for these types of commodities will cost local governments more to do routine business. The 4th Quarter of 2017-18 shows an increase of 2.3% over the prior quarter and an increase of 8.5% over the 4th Quarter of 2016-17. Staff has rated this indicator as Negative. Municipal Cost Index 255.00 250.00 245.00 240.00 235.00 230.00 225.00 4Q'16 1Q'17 2Q'17 3Q'17 4Q'17 1Q'18 2Q'18 3Q'18 4Q'18 Source:American City and County Magazine Note: The Municipal Cost Index is designed to show the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services. State and local government officials rely on American City&County's Municipal Cost Index to stay on top of price trends,help control price increases for commodities, make informed government contract decisions and intelligent budget planning. Since 1978, readers have loyally referred to the Municipal Cost Index to determine the cost of inflation and, hence,the rising cost of doing business as a local government. 33 Hotel Occupancy Tax Analysis I Outlook I Positive Description: Tax imposed on a person who, under a lease, concession, permit, right of access, license, contract, or agreement,pays for the use of a room that is in a hotel. A hotel includes: any building in which the public may obtain sleeping accomodations; motels; a tourist home, house or court; lodginghouse; inn; roominghouse; or bed and breakfast. The tax rate levied by the City is 7%of the price paid for a room. The State also levies a tax equal to 6%. Analysis: While the use of this revenue source is restricted by state law, it is an essential revenue source for various tourist related activities within the community and an important indicator of local economic activity. Hotel Occupancy tax revenue through the 4th Quarter of FY 2018 was 9.5% less than budget and 8.43% more than prior year's actual. Staff has rated the outlook for this economic indicator as Positive. 4th Quarter FY 2017-18 Actual Y-T-D Occupancy Tax Revenue: $ 713,496 $ 2,762,062 FY 2017-18 Budget $ 789,529 $ 3,052,174 Over(Under)Budget $ (76,033) $ (290,112) FISCAL YEAR FORECAST Hotel Occupancy Tax Budget: $ 3,052,174 End of Year Projection: $ 3,052,174 End of Year Actual: $ 2,762,062 Variance-Actual to Budget $ (290,112) Variance-Actual to Projection $ (290,112) Hotel Occupancy Tax Collections $900,000 $800,000 — $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr ■FY 2014-15 ■FY 2015-16 ■FY 2016-17 ■FY 2017-18 34 Sales and Use Tax Analysis Outlook Description: Tax imposed on all retail sales, leases, and rentals of most goods, as well as taxable services. The total tax rate levied within the City is 8.25%(State,6.25%;City, 1.5%; DCTA,0.5%). Analysis: As the second largest revenue source to the City's General Fund,sales and use taxes are essential to the delivery of services to the community.Sales tax revenues through the 4th Quarter of FY 2018 compared to revenues from the prior year 4th Quarter shows a -0.26% decrease, and compared to the budget shows a 1.62% increase. Staff has rated this indicator as Positive. Revenue:Gross Sales Tax Municipal Operations $ 631,423 $ 1,993,932 General Retail&Others 9,554,464 37,741,645 Comptroller Fees (187,369) (740,177) Amount Retained (183,622) (725,375) Total Revenue $ 9,814,896 $ 38,270,025 *Expenses:Economic Incentives Denton Crossing' $ 140,535 $ 684,313 Unicorn Lake 21,180 75,011 Rayzor Ranch 450,582 1,415,014 Golden Triangle 6,103 82,163 Total Expenses $ 618,400 $ 2,256,501 Net Total 9,196,496 36,013,524 FY 2017-18 Budget 9,024,868 33,807,566 Over(Under)Budget $ 171,628 $ 2,205,958 Sales Tax Budget: $ 36,181,385 Year End Projection: 39,452,935 Year End Actual: 38,270,025 Variance to Original Budget: $ 2,088,640 Variance to Year End Projection: $ (1,182,910) Economic Development Expenditure Budget: $ 2,373,819 Year End Projection: 2,373,819 Year End Actual: 2,256,501 Variance to Original Budget: $ 117,318 Variance to Year End Projection: $ 117,318 Gross Sales Tax Collections (Millions) $10.0 $9.0 $8.0 - $7.0 — - $6.0 $5.0 $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 - $0.0 - - 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr ■FY 2013-14 Actual -i FY 2014-15 Actual o FY 2015-16 Actual V FY 2016-17 Actual V FY 2017-18 Actual 'Incentive is 50%of general sales taxes.For 2017-18 sales tax equaled$2,052,939. 2Incentive is 50%of general sales taxes.For 2017-18 sales tax equaled$225,033. 3Incentive is 75%of general sales taxes.For 2017-18 sales tax equaled$2,691,150. °Incentive is 75%of general sales taxes.For 2017-18 sales tax equaled$164,326. 35 Certificates of Occupancy I Outlook I Cautious Description: Certificates of Occupancy (CO) are permits issued in compliance with the 2009 International Building Code (IBC) and applicable City ordinances. The IBC states, "that no building shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made, until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy." Certificates of Occupancy ensure that applicable building, fire and consumer health codes are met. Analysis: Certificates of Occupancy are an economic indicator that provides a framework for the overall condition of the local economy. Certificates of Occupancy increased 36.1%from the prior quarter and decreased 39.1%from the 4th Quarter of 2017. Staff has rated the outlook for this revenue indicator as Cautious. Certificates of Occupancy 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q '13 '14 '14 '14 '14 '15 '15 IS '15 '16 '16 '16 '16 '17 '17 '17 '17 '18 '18 '18 '18 ------------- Source:City of Denton's Development Services Department. 36 Residential Permits I Outlook I Cautious Description: Residential Permits are issued in compliance with the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC) and applicable City ordinances. The data presented in this analysis only include new permits issued and not remodels/alterations. Analysis: Residential Permits are an economic indicator that provides a framework for the overall condition of the local economy. In particular, residential permits have a direct correlation with building inspection fees and appraised values. Residential permits increased 74.6% from the prior quarter and increased 6.1% from the 4ch Quarter of 2017. Staff has rated the outlook for this revenue indicator as Cautious Residential Permits 350.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 iti 0.0 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q '13 '14 '14 '14 '14 '15 '15 '15 '15 '16 '16 '16 '16 '17 '17 '17 '17 '18 '18 '18 '18 Source:City of Denton's Development Services Department. 37 Texas Leading Indicators Index I Outlook I Cautious Description: The Texas Leading Indicators Index is a single weighted summary statistic that sheds light on the future of the state's economy. The index is designed to signal movements and changes in the state's rate of growth. The index includes the following leading indicators: Texas Value of the Dollar, U.S. Leading Index, Real Oil Prices, Well Permits, Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance, Texas Stock Index, Help-Wanted Advertising, and Average Weekly Hours Worked in Manufacturing. Analysis: Texas Leading Indicators provide a framework for the overall condition of the local economy. Data for this quarter shows an increase in the state's rate of growth. The index decreased 1.15% from the prior quarter and increased 2.06%from the 4th Quarter of 2016-17. Staff has rated this indicator as Cautious Texas Leading Indicators Index 140.0 135.0 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 110.0 105.0 100.0 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q 2Q 4Q '08 '09 '09 '10 '10 '11 '11 '12 '12 '13 '13 '14 '14 '15 '15 '16 '16 '17 '17 '18 '18 Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 38 Unemployment Rate Index I Outlook I Positive Description: Unemployment is defined as the number or proportion of people looking for work at the prevailing wage who are unable to find employment. Analysis: Unemployment is an economic indicator that provides a framework for the overall condition of the national, state and local economies. The unemployment rate for the City of Denton is at 3.2% for the 4`" Quarter. The unemployment rates for most of the other reported sectors were either down slightly or flat from the prior quarter. As a result of the downward trend since the high of the 2nd Quarter of 2012,staff has rated the outlook for this revenue indicator as Positive. Unemployment Rate Index 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 i 2.0 L L 4Q'12 2Q'13 4Q'13 2Q'14 4Q'14 2Q'15 4Q'15 2Q'16 4Q'16 2Q'17 4Q'17 2Q'18 4Q'18 `IDallas-Plano-Irving MD IDenton -Texas -U6 Unemployment -United States Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,and Texas Workforce Commission Note: U6 unemployment includes marginally attached workers who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part-time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. 39 A • I I Highway Medallion at North Texas Blvd 40 Section 4 City of Denton Quarterly Financial Report September 2018 INVESTMENT REPORT 41 c>t CITY OF DENTON : QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page.1 INVESTMENT POOL Policy Par Market Book Unrealized Max. Benchmark :Portfolio: Value Value Value Gain/(Loss)' WAM WAM YTM Yleld* :Investment Pool :$ 610,092,457 $ 606,716,884 $ 609,567,636 $ (2,850,752) 206 550 1.7-3 2.05% 1 *Twelve month moving average of a one year :U.S.T-bill yield %of Total Par Market Book Unrealized Portfolio Policy :Securities By Investment Type: Value Value Value Gainl(Loss)' WAM YTM (Book Value) Max. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :U.S.Treasuries 27,000,000 26,893,742 26,947,477 (53,735) 104 1.57% 4.42% 100.00% :U.S.Federal Agencies 257,756,000 254,844,355 257,563,816 (2,719,461) 373 1.53% 42.26% 100.00% :Municipal Bonds 11,000,000 10,930,770 11,000,000 (69,230) 153 1.07% 1.80% 15.00% :Certificates of Deposit 82,000,000 82,000,000 82,000,000 - 252 1.70% 13.45% 35.00% :Commercial Paper 36,000,000 35,711,560 35,719,886 (8,326) 116 2.50% 5.86% 15.00% :Local Government Investment Pools 194,701,747 194,701,747 194,701,747 - 1 1.94% 31.94% 50.00% :Demand Deposits 1,634,710 1,634,710 1,634,710 1 0.80% 0.27% :Total Portfolio j$ 610,092,457 $ 606,716,884 $ 609,567,636 $ (2,850,752) 206 1.73% 100.00% :'Unrealized gain/(loss)is the difference between the market and book value and does not represent an actual gain or loss. Gains and losses are: :realized only when a security is sold prior to maturity. Since it is the City's practice to hold investments until they mature,the temporary gains and: :losses are unlikely to be realized. Current 3 Months Ago 3 Month 1 Year Ago 1 Year Ago :Investment Pool Comparisons: 9/30/2018 6I30I2018 Difference 9I30I2017 Difference L----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Par Value :$ 610,092,457 $ 555,902,431 $ 54,190,026 $ 707,614,071 $ (97,521,614) :Market Value :$ 606,716,884 $ 552,367,304 $ 54,349,580 $ 706,581,905 $ (99,865,021) :Book Value :$ 609,567,636 $ 555,370,737 $ 54,196,899 $ 707,643,535 $ (98,075,899) :Unrealized Gain(Loss) :$ (2,850,752) $ (3,003,433) $ 152,681 $ (1,061,630) $ (1,789,122) :Weighted Average Maturity 206 291 (85) 382 (176) :Yield to Maturity 1.73% 1.58% 0.15% 1.25% 0.48% :Portfolio Composition: :U.S.Treasuries 4.42% 4.85% -0.42% 7.64% -3.21% :U.S.Federal Agencies 42.26% 54.11% -11.85% 49.86% -7.61% :Municipal Bonds 1.80% 1.98% -0.19% 3.23% -1.42% :Certificates of Deposit 13.45% 18.36% -4.90% 21.34% :Commercial Paper 5.86% 3.74% 2.12% 5.63% :Local Government Investment Pools 31.94% 11.92% 20.02% 8.47% 23.47% :Insured Cash Sweep Savings Deposits 0.00% 4.50% -4.50% 3.53% j Demand Deposits 0.27% 0.54% -0.27% 0.30% :Bank Collateral Review"*: : Institution Collateral Type Market Value Collected Balance Pledge Required Collateral Ratio :Wells Fargo Demand Deposits IBNY Mellon U.S.Agency MBS $ 35,757,895 $ 1,634,710 >102% 2187.42% :LegacyTexas Bank Certificates of Deposit- :Fed Home Loan Bank Standby LOC $ 26,360,000 $ 25,500,180 >102% 103.37% :Independent Bank Certificates of Deposit :Fed Home Loan Bank Standby LOC $ 16,950,000 $ 15,257,438 >100% 111.09% j**Does not include FDIC insurance -Formerly,ViewPoint Bank :Depository Ledger Balance Review: Institution Account Type Beginning Bal. Deposits Withdrawals Ending Bal. ------------------------------------------- !g:,!1nIng Bal. Wells Fargo Bank Checking $ 2,179,418 $ 108,660,592 $ (109,205,300) $ 1,634,710 :Compliance Statement&Review: :The Quarterly Investment Report is in full compliance with the objectives,restrictions,and strategies as set forth in the Cityof Denton's Investment; :Policy and the Public Funds Investment Act(Texas Government Code,Chapter 2256.023). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANTONIO PUENTE,JR. KEVIN ANN MULLEN Reviewer:Antonio Puente,Jr.,CGFO Preparer:Kevin Ann Mullen,CPA Chief Financial Officer Treasury Manager --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 42 CITY OF DENT. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT POOL Current 3 Months Ago 3 Month 1 Year Ago 1 Year 9/30/2018 6/30/2018 Difference 9/30/2017 Difference -------------------------------------------------------------------------------'------------------- ' :Par Value-U.S.Treasuries $ 27,000,000 $ 27,000,000 $ - $ 54,000,000 $ (27,000,000) :Par Value-U.S.Federal Agencies 257,756,000 300,756,000 (43,000,000) 352,756,000 (95,000,000) :Par Value-Municipal Bonds 11,000,000 11,000,000 - 22,800,000 (11,800,000) :Certificates of Deposit 82,000,000 102,000,000 (20,000,000) 151,000,000 (69,000,000) ;Par Value-Commercial Paper 36,000,000 21,000,000 15,000,000 40,000,000 (41000,000) Local Government Investment Pools 194,701,747 66,174,172 128,527,575 59,924,172 134,777,575 Insured Cash Sweep Savings Deposits - 25,000,000 (25,000,000) 25,000,000 (25,000,000) :Demand Deposits 1,634,710 2,972,259 (1,337,549) 2,133,899 (499,189) :Total Par Value $ 610,092,467 $ 555,902,431 $ 54,190,026 $ 707,614,071 $ (97,521,614) Market Value-U.S.Treasuries $ 26,893,742 $ 26,827,579 $ 66,163 $ 54,005,424 $ (27,111,682) ;Market Value-U.S.Federal Agencies 254,844,355 297,698,394 (42,854,039) 351,938,910 (97,094,555) (Market Value-Municipal Bonds 10,930,770 10,904,650 26,120 22,733,295 (11,802,525) Certificates of Deposit 82,000,000 102,000,000 (20,000,000) 151,000,000 (69,000,000) Market Value-Commercial Paper 35,711,560 20,790,250 14,921,310 39,846,205 (4,134,645) :Local Government Investment Pools 194,701,747 66,174,172 128,527,575 59,924,172 134,777,575 :Insured Cash Sweep Savings Deposits - 25,000,000 (25,000,000) 25,000,000 (25,000,000) Demand Deposits 1,634,710 2,972,259 (1,337,549) 2,133,899 (499,189) :Total Market Value $ 606,716,884 $ 552,367,304 $ 54,349,580 $ 706,581,905 $ (99,865,021) :Book Value-U.S.Treasuries $ 26,947,477 $ 26,910,229 $ 37,248 $ 54,062,054 $ (27,114,577) :Book Value-U.S.Federal Agencies 257,563,816 300,518,882 (42,955,066) 352,831,583 (95,267,767) :Book Value-Municipal Bonds 11,000,000 11,000,000 - 22,841,978 (11,841,978) :Certifcates of Deposit 82,000,000 102,000,000 (20,000,000) 151,000,000 (69,000,000) Book Value-Commercial Paper 35,719,886 20,795,195 14,924,691 39,849,849 (4,129,963) :Local Government Investment Pools 194,701,747 66,174,172 128,527,575 59,924,172 134,777,575 :Insured Cash Sweep Savings Deposits - 25,000,000 (25,000,000) 25,000,000 (25,000,000) :Demand Deposits 1,634,710 2,972,259 (1,337,549) 2,133,899 (499,189) Total Book Value $ 609,567,636 $ 555,370,737 $ 54,196,899 $ 707,643,535 $ (98,075,899) :Accrued Interest $ 2,671,966 $ 3,171,462 $ (499,496) $ 3,052,951 $ (380,985) :Cash Value- $ 609,388,850 $ 555,538,766 $ 53,850,084 $ 709,634,856 $ (100,246,006) :(Total Market Value Accrued Interest) Unrealized Gain/(Loss) $ (2,850,752) $ (3,003,433) $ 152,681 $ (1,061,630) $ (1,789,122) :Change in Fair Value since 9130/17- $ (1,356,603) $ (1,631,152) $ 274,549 $ (1,586,781) $ 230,178 :(GASB 31) ;Strategy Statement: :The investment pool is an aggregation of the majority of City funds which may include tax receipts,enterprise fund revenues,fine and fee: :income, as well as some, but not necessarily all bond proceeds,grants, gifts and endowments. This portfolio is maintained to meet: :anticipated daily cash needs for the City's operations,capital projects and debt service. In order to meet these obligations and to minimize: :potential liquidation losses,the dollar-weighted stated average maturity of the investment pool shall not exceed 1.5 years or 550 days. The: :objectives of this portfolio are to: (1)ensure safety of principal by investing in only high quality securities for which a strong secondary market: :exists;(2)ensure that anticipated cash flow needs are matched with adequate investment liquidity;(3)limit market and credit risk through: :diversification;and(4)attain the best feasible yield,commensurate with the objectives and restrictions set forth in the Investment Policy,by: :actively managing the portfolio to meet or exceed the twelve month moving average yield of a one year U.S.Treasury bill as derived from the: :Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 for constant maturities. : `----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------' 43 44 REPORTCITY OF DENTON:QUARTERLY INVESTMENT INVESTMENTPOOL Current 3 Months Ago 1 Year Ago ;Summary By Issuer: 8/SO/2016 6/30/2018 8/SO/2017 :CDARS CDs 42,000,000.00 42,000,000.00 59,000,000.00 :LEGACYTEXAS BANK CDs' 25,000,000 45,000,000 62,000,000 INDEPENDENT BANK CDs 15,000,000 15,000,000 30,000,000 :U.S.TREASURY 26,947,477 26,910,229 54,062,054 :FFCB 57,996,001 71,996,109 84,030,979 ;FHLB 105,978,215 115,963,972 130,125,419 ;FHLMC 25,932,308 42,928,630 52,934,154 ;FNMA 67,657,291 69,630,170 85,741,031 DALLAS,TX WTR&SWR REV BDS 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 ;TEXAS A&M UNIV REV BDS 1,000,000 10,000,000 4,500,000 ;LUBBOCK,TX GO REFUNDING BDS - 1,000,000 3,301,573 (UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON,TX REV BOB: - - 5,040,405 .JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC 10,923,670 10,854,083 24,870,611 :TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 19,820,178 - 4,990,263 :NESTLE FINANCE INTL LTD - - 9,988,975 :ING(U.S.)FUNDING LLC - 4,996,125 - ;NATIXIS NY BRANCH 4,976,038 4,944,988 - ;TEXSTAR 194,701,747 66,174,172 59,924,172 INSURED CASH SWEEP SAVINGS - 25,000,000 25,000,000 WELLS FARGO DEMAND DEPOSITS 1,634,710 2,972,258 2,133,899 :Total Book Value $ 609,567,636 $ 555,370.736 $ 707,643,535 Current 9/30/2018 • WF DEMAND DEPOSITS,0.27% Is CDARS CDs,6.89% Is LEGACYTEXAS BANK CDs,4.10% is I INDEPENDENT BANK CDs,2.46% is TEXSTAR,31.94% Is U.S.TREASURY,4.42% Is FFCB,9.51% is NATIXIS NY BRANCH,0.82% ■FHLB,17.39% ■ ING(U.S.)FUNDING LLC,.9% 44 ■ 1P MORGAN SECURITIES LLC,1.79% is DALLAS,TX WTR&SWR REV BDS,1.64% ■ TEXAS A&M UNIV REV BDS,0.16% ■FNMA,11.10% Is FHLMC,4.25% :Objective: It is the policy of the City to diversify its investment portfolio by restricting investments in a single issuer/institution to no more than 35 percent of the portfolio's total book value and to those offering repurchase agreements,collateralized CDs(including standby letters of credit),and local or state of Texas municipal securities to no greater than 15 percent.The purpose of this requirement is to limit market and credit risk.Commercial paper issuers are further restricted by a 5 percent total portfolio limitation.There are no issuer limitations on U.S.Treasuries or FDIC insured products except as they pertain to the overall 35%certificates of deposit and 15%savings deposit restrictions.Some Current 3Months Ago 1Year Ago ;Summary By Issuer: 9/30/2018 6/30/2018 9/30/2017 CDARS CDs 6.89% 7.56% 4.98% LEGACYTEXAS BANK CDs' 4.10% 8.10% 9.90 INDEPENDENT BANK CDs 2.46% 2.70% 3.86% :U.S.TREASURY 4.42% 4.85% 6.96% FFCB 9.51% 12.96% 10.03% ;FHLB 17.39% 20.88% 18.65% (FHLMC 4.25% 7.73% 5.53% :FNMA 11.10% 12.54% 10.40% :DALLAS,TX WTR&SWR REV BDS 1.64% 1.80% 1.29% ;TEXAS A&M UNIV REV BDS 0.16% 0.18% 1.22% :GE CAPITAL TREASURY LLC - - 2.31 :LUBBOCK,TX GO REFUNDING BDS - - 0.43% :UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON,TX REV BDS - - 0.65% :MCKINNEY,TX GENERAL OBG BONDS - - 0.15% :TEXAS SCHOOL DIST GEN DEG BONDS : - - 0.37% :JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC 1.79% 1.95% 1.92% �TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 3.25% - 2.18% :NESTLE FINANCE INTL LTD - - 1.92% ;ING(U.S.)FUNDING LLC - 0.90% - :AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE - - 0.64 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 0.82% 0.89% - :TEXSTAR 31.94% 11.92% 16.39% :INSURED CASH SWEEP SAVINGS - 4.50% - ;WELLS FARGO DEMAND DEPOSITS 0.27% 0.54% 0.22% Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% -Formerly,ViewPoint Bank ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 45 CITY OF DENTON : QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT 14th Fiscal Quarter 2018-September 30,20,18 Page 5 INVESTMENT POOL Current 3 Months Ago 1 Year Ago ;Maturity Time Frame: 9/30/2018 6/30/2018 9/30/2017 -------------------- :00-03 Months $ 235,336,457 $ 162,146,431 $ 136,058,071 :03-06 Months 116,000,000 39,000,000 115,300,000 :06-12 Months 96,000,000 147,000,000 137,500,000 :12-24 Months 162,756,000 192,000,000 200,000,000 :24 Months&Over 15,756,000 118,756,000 Total Par Value $ 610,092,457 $ 555,902,431 $ 707,614,071 $750,000,000 $700,000,000 $650,000,000 $600,000,000 $550,000,000 $500,000,000 $450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $0 Current 3 Months Ago 1 Year Ago 000-06 Months ■06-12 Months ■12-24 Months ■24 Months&Over ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i ;Objective: :The risk of market price volatility is minimized through maturity diversification. Investment maturities are staggered to provide cash flows: based on the anticipated needs of the City.Liquidity is achieved by matching investment maturities with forecasted cash disbursements: :and by investing in securities with active secondary markets. Short-term local government investment pools and government money: ;market mutual funds help to provide daily liquidity and may be utilized as a competitive alternative to other fixed income investments. ---------------------- ---------------------------- - Current 3 Months Ago 1 Year Ago (Maturity Time Frame: 9/30/2018---------- -6/30/2018--------------------------- 9/30/2017 ----------------------- I :00-03 Months 38.57% 29.17% 19.23% :03-06 Months 19.01% 7.02% 16.29 06-12 Months 15.74% 26.44% 19.43 12-24 Months 26.68% 34.54% 28.26 24 Months&Over 0.00% 2.83% 16.78 ;Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00 46 CITY OF DENTON : QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT ECONOMIC SUMMARY Interest Rate History :Source: U.S.Federal Reserve Statistical t---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :Release(H.15) Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Dec-12 Mar-13 Jun-13 Sep-13 Dec-13 Mar-14 Jun-14 Sep-14 Dec-14 Mar-15 Jun-15 Sep-15 ;Market Sector: Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg Avg ------------------------------------------------*-----------------------------------------------*----------------------------------------------- :Fed Funds(effective) 0.16% 0.14% 0.09% 0.08%: 0.09% 0.08% 0.10% 0.09%: 0.12% 0.11% 0.13% 0.14%: :3-Month U.S.T-Bill 0.07% 0.09% 0.05% 0.02%: 0.07% 0.05% 0.04% 0.02%: 0.03% 0.03% 0.02% 0.02%: :2-Year U.S.T-Note 0.26% 0.26% 0.33% 0.40%: 0.34% 0.40% 0.45% 0.57%: 0.64% 0.64% 0.69% 0.71%1 :Portfolio Benchmark* 0.18% 0.18% 0.16% 0.15%: 0.13% 0.13% 0.12% 0.12%: 0.12% 0.15% 0.18% 0.24%: Portfolio Yield 0.52% 0.50% 0.48% 0.49%: 0.50% 0.49% 0.49% 0.51%: 0.55% 0.57% 0.57% 0.65%: I-----------------------------------------------a-----------------------------------------------i-----------------------------------------------4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Dec-15 Mar-16 Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 Sep-17 Dec-17 Mar-18 Jun-18 Sep-18 Market Sector: Avg Avg-------Av9-------Avg --- Avg Avg-------Av9-------Av9--- Avg Avg-------Av9-------Avg --- I---------------- # ---------- # ---------- i :Fed Funds(effective) 0.24% 0.36% 0.38% 0.40% 0.54% 0.79% 1.04% t.15%: 1.30% 1.67% 1.90% 3-Month U.S.T-Bill 0.23% 0.30% 0.27% 0.29%: 0.51% 0.75% 1.00% 1.05%: 1.32% 1.71% 1.92% 2.20% :2-Year U.S.T-Note 0.98% 0.88% 0.73% 0.77%: 1.20% 1.31% 1.34% 1.38%: 1.84% 2.27% 2.53% 2.57% Portfolio Benchmark* 0.32% 0.41% 0.49% 0.54: 0.61% 0.69% 0.83% 1.00%: 1.20% 1.46% 1.75% 2.05%: Portfolio Yield 0.72% 0.79% 0.81% 0.90%: 0.95% 1.07% 1.16% 1.25%: 1.29% 1.42% 1.58% 1.73%: *Twelve month moving average of a one year :U.S.T-bill yield 3.00% FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 2.00% 1.00% - 0.00 Dec-Mar-Jun-Sep-Dec-Mar-Jun-Sep-Dec-Mar-Jun-Sep-Dec-Mar-Jun-Sep-Dec-Mar-Jun-Sep-Dec-Mar-Jun-Sep- 18 18 18 t Fed s - 'A-Month T-Bill - Yield lio Benchmark* Fiscal Year to Date Earnings tat Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter ' I-----------*-----------------------T-----------*-----------------------T-----------*-----------------------T---- :Fiscal Year: 3 Months 6 Months 9 Months 12 Months I-----------#-----------------------#-----------#-----------------------#-----------#--$-----------6- -----------#------------ :2017-2018 $ 2,138,420; $ 4,317,890; ,515,166; $ 8,955,045; :2016-2017 $ 1,175,753; ;$ 2,763,135; ;$ 4,734,315; ;$ 6,999,226 :2015-2016 $ 849,369 $ 1,771,206 $ 2,743,857 $ 3,961,973 :2014-2015 $ 613,877; $ 1,228,059; $ 1,874,846; $ 2,695,211 :2013-2014 $ 568,824 $ 1,121,491 $ 1,680,154 $ 2,298,785 QUARTERLY COMMENTARY September 30,2018 Source: First Southwest Asset :The second quarter GDP growth was+4.2%,the best performance in four years.The initial third quarter GDP numbers are Management Economic summary !approaching+4.0%.The economy continues to add jobs,averaging 190k per month in the third quarter as the unemployment :rate slipped to a 49-year low at 3.7%.Tentative signs of wage pressures are beginning to show up,although overall inflation :readings have actually moderated in recent months.The consumer price index retreated to+2.3%in September from+2.9%in :June.Capital spending plans are the highest in a decade and a record 25%of businesses expect to add workers in the coming :months.Market yields trended higher over the third quarter as the two-year Treasury note yield rose from 2.53%to 2.82%and :the ten-year from 2.86%to 3.06%.The Fed funds raised in September,boosting the overnight rate to a range of 2%-2.25%. , :Looking forward,a December rate hike is still widely expected and the Fed's dot plot indicates three more in 2019. 47 Monthly Reports Portfolio Management Page 1 Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2018 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 365 Maturity Date Treasury Securities-Coupon 912828M64 3915 U.S.TREASURY 01/27/2017 7,000,000.00 6,992,657.00 7,000,543.13 1.250 1.186 45 11/15/2018 912828P53 3948 U.S.TREASURY 06/07/2017 10,000,000.00 9,940,230.00 9,981,208.92 0.750 1.258 137 02/15/2019 912828P95 3978 U.S.TREASURY 04/23/2018 5,000,000.00 4,968,360.00 4,972,518.46 1.000 2.233 165 03/15/2019 912828A34 3980 U.S.TREASURY 05/07/2018 5,000,000.00 4,992,495.00 4,993,206.52 1.250 2.087 60 11/30/2018 Subtotal and Average 26,941,606.39 27,000,000.00 26,893,742.00 26,947,477.03 1.573 104 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133EFX69 3897 FFCB 06/27/2016 4,000,000.00 3,999,492.00 4,000,025.23 0.960 0.902 4 10/05/2018 3133EG6Z3 3931 FFCB 02/13/2017 25,000,000.00 24,883,675.00 24,996,929.17 1.200 1.234 135 02/13/2019 3133EG2D6 3932 FFCB 02/16/2017 8,000,000.00 7,914,624.00 8,001,549.60 1.550 1.530 361 09/27/2019 3133EDPK2 3937 FFCB 02/22/2017 5,000,000.00 4,975,330.00 5,012,943.40 1.750 1.352 241 05/30/2019 3133EHEZ2 3959 FFCB 07/25/2017 6,000,000.00 5,894,394.00 6,005,455.61 1.600 1.538 553 04/06/2020 3133EJCA5 3976 FFCB 03/23/2018 5,000,000.00 4,949,110.00 4,979,333.59 2.150 2.416 585 05/08/2020 3130AARE0 3918 FHLB 01/30/2017 7,000,000.00 6,994,323.00 6,999,916.22 1.150 1.165 29 10/30/2018 3130AA3R7 3933 FHLB 02/16/2017 7,000,000.00 6,899,564.00 6,987,418.40 1.375 1.539 410 11/15/2019 3130AOJR2 3934 FHLB 02/16/2017 5,000,000.00 4,980,010.00 5,045,833.63 2.375 1.590 438 12/13/2019 3130AAXU7 3939 FHLB 03/08/2017 20,000,000.00 19,697,200.00 19,998,968.49 1.650 1.654 505 02/18/2020 3130ABAA4 3945 FHLB 04/26/2017 15,000,000.00 14,722,470.00 14,994,106.72 1.400 1.429 505 02/18/2020 3130ABM29 3951 FHLB 06/29/2017 15,000,000.00 14,742,150.00 15,000,000.00 1.500 1.500 505 02/18/2020 313378,177 3958 FHLB 07/25/2017 8,000,000.00 7,893,752.00 8,039,293.16 1.875 1.528 529 03/13/2020 3130AC2Q6 3973 FHLB 01/25/2018 5,000,000.00 4,934,125.00 4,966,474.18 1.450 2.072 403 11/08/2019 3133782M2 3975 FHLB 03/23/2018 5,000,000.00 4,981,565.00 4,985,824.49 1.500 2.160 158 03/08/2019 3130ADN32 3979 FHLB 04/23/2018 10,000,000.00 9,916,370.00 9,950,289.20 2.125 2.500 498 02/11/2020 3130AEDY3 3984 FHLB 05/30/2018 4,000,000.00 3,982,612.00 3,999,406.29 2.375 2.387 438 12/13/2019 3130AECJ7 3985 FHLB 05/30/2018 5,000,000.00 4,985,890.00 5,010,684.47 2.625 2.492 605 05/28/2020 3137EADZ9 3935 FHLMC 02/22/2017 5,000,000.00 4,964,650.00 4,995,156.27 1.125 1.308 196 04/15/2019 3134GA61-12 3938 FHLMC 02/28/2017 5,000,000.00 4,979,575.00 5,000,000.00 1.375 1.375 150 02/28/2019 3137EADR7 3960 FHLMC 07/25/2017 5,000,000.00 4,891,100.00 4,987,152.11 1.375 1.541 578 05/01/2020 3136G3XJ9 3903 FNMA 07/26/2016 5,000,000.00 4,935,475.00 5,000,000.00 1.000 1.000 298 07/26/2019 3135GOJ53 3904 FNMA 07/07/2016 10,000,000.00 9,947,310.00 10,009,793.99 1.000 0.754 148 02/26/2019 3136FTS67 3909 FNMA 08/30/2016 3,000,000.00 2,992,578.00 3,008,452.37 1.700 0.995 149 02/27/2019 3135GOJ53 3910 FNMA 08/30/2016 10,000,000.00 9,947,310.00 10,000,987.17 1.000 0.975 148 02/26/2019 3135GON33 3930 FNMA 02/08/2017 10,000,000.00 9,859,670.00 9,961,146.09 0.875 1.349 305 08/02/2019 3136G4MA8 3936 FNMA 02/28/2017 5,000,000.00 4,927,815.00 5,000,000.00 1.700 1.700 515 02/28/2020 3135GOT29 3942 FNMA 03/29/2017 5,000,000.00 4,914,490.00 4,993,547.71 1.500 1.594 515 02/28/2020 Portfolio CITY Data Updated:SET-MO: 10/17/2018 09:18 NL!AP Run Date:10/17/2018-09:18 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 48 Report Ver.7.3.6.1 Monthly Reports Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2018 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3135GOP49 3950 FNMA 06/14/2017 5,000,000.00 4,927,935.00 4,980,643.58 1.000 1.434 331 08/28/2019 3135GOR39 3971 FNMA 01/08/2018 10,000,000.00 9,824,910.00 9,896,720.43 1.000 1.993 388 10/24/2019 Subtotal and Average 244,201,148.47 237,000,000.00 234,459,474.00 236,808,051.57 1.529 356 Federal Agency Issues-Callable 3133EGEF8 3895 FFCB 06/22/2016 5,000,000.00 4,953,810.00 4,999,764.71 1.180 1.187 255 06/13/2019 3134GBVD1 3953 FHLMC 06/29/2017 6,000,000.00 5,879,874.00 6,000,000.00 1.625 1.625 637 06/29/2020 3134GBD82 3965 FHLMC 08/29/2017 4,950,000.00 4,838,154.75 4,950,000.00 1.625 1.625 697 08/28/2020 3136G4NZ2 3964 FNMA 08/29/2017 4,806,000.00 4,713,042.35 4,806,000.00 1.700 1.682 679 08/10/2020 Subtotal and Average 20,755,751.17 20,756,000.00 20,384,881.10 20,755,764.71 1.533 569 Municipal Bonds-Coupon 23542JBE4 3899 DALLAS,TX WTR&SWR REV BDS 07/07/2016 4,000,000.00 3,940,160.00 4,000,000.00 1.217 1.217 365 10/01/2019 23542JBD6 3900 DALLAS,TX WTR&SWR REV BDS 07/07/2016 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 0.985 0.985 0 10/01/2018 88213AFU4 3902 TX A&M UNIV REV BD 07/20/2016 1,000,000.00 990,610.00 1,000,000.00 1.009 1.009 226 05/15/2019 Subtotal and Average 11,000,000.00 11,000,000.00 10,930,770.00 11,000,000.00 1.072 153 CDs-CDARS SYS3929 3929 CD-CDARS 02/09/2017 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 1.677 1.677 129 02/07/2019 SYS3940 3940 CD-CDARS 03/16/2017 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 1.626 1.626 164 03/14/2019 SYS3955 3955 CD-CDARS 07/20/2017 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 1.698 1.698 290 07/18/2019 SYS3961 3961 CD-CDARS 08/10/2017 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 1.698 1.698 311 08/08/2019 SYS3966 3966 CD-CDARS 09/14/2017 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 1.523 1.523 346 09/12/2019 Subtotal and Average 42,000,000.00 42,000,000.00 42,000,000.00 42,000,000.00 1.657 245 CDs-SLOG SYS3944 3944 CD-INDEPENDENT BANK 04/13/2017 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 1.623 1.623 192 04/11/2019 SYS3974 3974 CD-INDEPENDENT BANK 02/08/2018 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 2.295 2.295 493 02/06/2020 SYS3946 3946 CD-LEGACYTEXAS BANK 05/11/2017 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 1.677 1.677 220 05/09/2019 SYS3949 3949 CD-LEGACYTEXAS BANK 06/15/2017 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 1.676 1.676 255 06/13/2019 Subtotal and Average 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 1.740 260 Commercial Paper Disc.-Amortizing 46640QLK5 3977 JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC 04/23/2018 5,000,000.00 4,983,665.00 4,983,190.28 2.470 2.579 49 11/19/2018 46640QPN5 3983 JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC 05/30/2018 6,000,000.00 5,939,460.00 5,940,480.00 2.480 2.597 144 02/22/2019 Portfolio CITY Data Updated:SET-MO: 10/17/2018 09:18 NL!AP Run Date:10/17/2018-09:18 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 49 Monthly Reports Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2018 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 365 Maturity Date Commercial Paper Disc.-Amortizing 63873KMBO 3982 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 05/30/2018 5,000,000.00 4,976,475.00 4,976,037.50 2.430 2.549 71 12/11/2018 89233HPE8 3986 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT 09/11/2018 20,000,000.00 19,811,960.00 19,820,177.77 2.380 2.438 136 02/14/2019 Subtotal and Average 29,088,924.17 36,000,000.00 35,711,560.00 35,719,885.55 2.500 116 Local Govt Investment Pools SYS3641 3641 LOCAL GOVT INV POOL-TEXSTAR 194,701,746.74 194,701,746.74 194,701,746.74 1.940 1.940 1 Subtotal and Average 158,333,508.01 194,701,746.74 194,701,746.74 194,701,746.74 1.940 1 Insured Cash Sweep Savings Deposits SYS3962 3962 INSURED CASH SWEEP SAVINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.950 1.950 1 Subtotal and Average 10,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 Demand Deposits SYS3706 3706 DEMAND DEPOSITS- WELLS FARGO 1,634,710.30 1,634,710.30 1,634,710.30 0.800 0.800 1 Subtotal and Average 2,343,655.53 1,634,710.30 1,634,710.30 1,634,710.30 0.800 1 Total and Average 584,664,593.73 610,092,457.04 606,716,884.14 609,567,635.90 1.732 206 Portfolio CITY Data Updated:SET_MO: 10/17/2018 09:18 NL!AP Run Date:10/17/2018-09:18 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 50 Monthly Reports Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash September 30, 2018 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 365 Maturity Average Balance 0.00 0 Total Cash and Investments 584,664,593.73 610,092,457.04 606,716,884.14 609,567,635.90 1.732 206 Portfolio CITY Data Updated:SET_MO: 10/17/2018 09:18 NL!AP Run Date:10/17/2018-09:18 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 51 a.t•.jam � - _ -_ - - _. _ _ '- �_ Leap Frogs, Karmien Bowman -North Lakes Park 52 Section 5 City of Denton Quarterly Financial Report September 2018 PERFORMANCE REPORT 53 STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-18 The City of Denton uses a Strategic Plan as a roadmap to achieve long-term goals and objectives that capture the City's Vision, Mission, and Value statements. The first Strategic Plan was formally approved by the City Council in April 2011, and it has been updated periodically since that time.Over the past year, the City has partnered with the Bloomberg What Works Cities initiative to refine our strategic outcomes and identify measurable ways to mark our progress. The City Council approved the FY 2017-18 Strategic Plan and associated performance measures on September 19, 2017. The Strategic Plan serves as the basis for resource allocation decisions that are used in the development of the FY 2017-18 Budget. The Strategic Plan is organized into five Key Focus Areas (KFAs) and major goals associated with each KFA are also identified below. Goal 1.1 Manage financial resources in a responsible manner. Goal 1.2 Develop a high-performance work force. Goal 1.3 Promote effective internal and external communication. Goal 1.4 Achieve high level of customer satisfaction. Goal 1.5 Utilize technology to enhance efficiency and productivity. Goal 1.6 Collaborate with local,regional,state,and federal partners. Key Focus Area 2:Public Infrastructure Goal 2.1 Optimize resources to improve quality of City roadways. Goal 2.2 Seek solutions to mobility demands and enhance connectivity. Goal 2.3 Promote superior utility services and facilities. Goal 2.4 Manage drainage infrastructure. Goal 2.5 Develop Capital Improvement Program(CIP)based on community needs. 1 Goal Developtargeted policies and incentives to achieve desired economic growth. Goa] Make Denton a destination for visitors. Goa13.3 Promote a business-friendly environment. Goal 3.4 Encourage development,redevelopment,recruitment,and retention. Goal 4.1 Enhance public safety in the community. Goal 4.2 Seek clean and healthy neighborhoods in Denton. Goal 4.3 Provide quality,diverse,and accessible neighborhood services for the community. Goal 4.4 Provide and support outstanding leisure,cultural,and educational opportunities. Goal 4.5 Provide support to citizens in need through social service agencies and programs. Goal 5.1 Manage Denton's water resources. Goal 5.2 Improve air quality and greenhouse gas management. Goal 5.3 Improve energy efficiency and conservation. Goal 5.4 Manage land use and preserve open/natural s aces. Goal 5.5 Provide alternative modes of transportation. Goal 5.6 Promote sustainable materials resource management. Goal 5.7 Encourage local food production. 54 STRATEGIC PLAN 2017-18 The matrix below organizes the Key Focus Areas (KFAs) by select service areas in the organization. While every department has some level of responsibility for each KFA,the matrix is intended to only highlight the primary departments responsible for each KFA. UTILITIES Electric ✓ Water ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Wastewater ✓ ✓ Solid Waste ✓ INTERNAL SERVICES Technology Services ✓ Materials Management ✓ Fleet ✓ ✓ Risk ✓ 111 ' Building Inspection ✓ ✓ ✓ Community Improvement Services ✓ Libraries ✓ Parks and Recreation ✓ Plannin ✓ ✓ ✓ Gas Well Operations ✓ CommunitV Development ✓ PUBLIC SAFETY Animal Services ✓ Fire ✓ Police ✓ Municipal Court ✓ TRANSPORTATION Airport ✓ Streets ✓ Traffic Trans 9 ortation ✓ ✓ City Manager's Office ✓ Economic Development ✓ Facilities Management ✓ Finance ✓ ✓ Human Resources ✓ Internal Audit ✓ Legal ✓ Public Communications ✓ OrganizationalKey Focus Area 1: Key Focus Area 2:Public Infrastructure l'y Focus Area 3: Economic Development ey Focus Area 4:Safe,Liveable and Family-Friendly Community ,116LFocus Area 5:Sustainable&Environmental Stewardship 55 STRATEGIC PLAN PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD 2017-18 • 1 • • • PERCENTAGE OF FIRST CONTACT RESOLUTION FOR CUSTOMERS 85% 94.7% CUSTOMER SERVICE PERCENTAGE OF BILLING ACCURACY 99% 99.97% PERCENTAGE OF PAYMENTS PROCESSED VIA ONLINE SELF-SERVICE 55% 62.49% PUBLIC PERCENTAGE OF CITIZENS RATING THE CITY WEBSITE AS A MAJOR SOURCE OF COMMUNICATIONS INFORMATION 65% 60% •• • NUMBER OF FOLLOWERS ACROSS ALL CITY SOCIAL MEDIA SITES 165,000 214,411 PERCENTAGE OF ACTUAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE COMPARED TO BUDGETED REVENUE 100% 101.7% PERCENTAGE OF ACTUAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES AS COMPARED TO BUDGETED FINANCE EXPENDITURES <100%4 98.3% ANNUAL RATE OF INVESTMENT RETURN 1.25% 1.73% ENGINEERING PERCENTAGE OF BOND FUNDED PROJECTS COMPLETED 85% 84% LANE MILES OF ASPHALT ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTED 12 15.87 LANE MILES OF ASPHALT ROADWAY OVERLAID 15 16.14 INFRASTRUCTURE STREETS LANE MILES OF ASPHALT ROADWAY MICRO-SEALED 45 0 MILES OF SIDEWALK RECONSTRUCTED 2 t 4.61 AIRPORT NUMBER OF ACRES OF AIRPORT LAND NEWLY LEASED 7 0 NUMBER OF RFP'S RETURNED IN TARGET INDUSTRY SECTORS 20 15 NUMBER OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES OR GRANTS FACILITATED 12 34 ECONOMIC ECONOMIC NUMBER OF DOWNTOWN PROPERTIES REDEVELOPED 6 16 DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT NUMBER OF BUSINESS RETENTION VISITS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA 24 17 NUMBER OF BUSINESS RETENTION VISITS IN AREAS OTHER THAN DOWNTOWN 48 43 POLICE PERCENT OF RESOLVED NEIGHBORHOOD COMPLAINTS 75% 100% PERCENT OF ACTIVE STRUCTURE FIRES RESPONDED TO IN FIVE MINUTES OR LESS(NFPA 1710 STANDARD IS 90 PERCENT OR LESS THAN FOUR MINUTES) 90"% 51.2"% KFA 4:SAFE.LIVEABLE FIRE AVERAGE UNIT TURN-OUT TIME(TIME FROM WHEN A 911 DISPATCH IS RECEIVED TO WHEN UNITS ARE IN ROUTE) 1.20 1.14 COMMUNITYPARKS NUMBER OF SPECIAL EVENTS HOSTED BY THE PARKS&RECREATION DEPARTMENT 8 12 NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS REACHED BY THE DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY"DPL2GO"OUTREACH LIBRARY SERVICE 5,000 21,083 NUMBER OF"DPL2GO"OUTREACH EVENTS 60 156 SOLID WASTE POUNDS OF WASTE DISPOSED PER CAPITA 1,900 1,760 MILES OF ON-STREET BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE,SUCH AS BIKE LANES AND SHARROWS,ADDED ENGINEERING DURING FISCAL YEAR2017-18 7 8.8 AND ••NMENTAL NUMBER OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND EVENTS 11 12 STEWARDSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL NUMBER OF SUSTAINABILITY RELATED WORKSHOPS HOSTED BY THE CITY 35 54 SERVICES PERCENT OF GREENSENSE REBATE FUNDING EXPENDED 100% 67% 56 STRATEGIC PLAN WORK PLAN REPORT 2017 - 18 City of Denton, Texas STRATEGIC PLAN - WORK PLAN DASHBOARD 2017-18 • • • Implement online payment and citizen service request systems Dec 2017 The application launched June 18,2018 with a planned 90-day soft launch. The City has continued production of the bimonthly Resident Launch a bi-monthly newsletter for citizens and stakeholders Dec 2017 Update.Past issues can be found at https://www.cityofdenton.com/en-us/stay-updated under Important Documents. Expand open data initiatives and improve citizen access to information Sep 2018 There are currently 152 total datasets available at http://data.cityofdenton.com. Hold regular performance management meetings with departments and Developing an alternative strategy to identify performance •' • City Manager Office g p g g p Sep 2018 measures that will provide greater clarity into the City's various executive team operations and be a more effective tool for management staff. A dashboard of the City's performance related to strategic plan Offer key indicators of the City's performance through an online Dec 2017 measures is located at dashboard http://data.cityofdenton.com/base/strategic-performance- measures Staff is continue to test a new contract management software Evaluate purchasing and contract management policies and procedures Jun 2018 and developing related training materials.In preparation for implementation staff has developed updated contract templates. Complete 80%of construction on the new West Parallel Runway Sep 2018 TxDOT solicited construction contract,with construction to Airport begin FY2018/19 Q1. Complete the Airport Business Plan Update Sep 2018 Drafting documents for Council Airport Committee review, followed by formal public input process. Engage a consultant to assist with review of railroad crossings in the city, Diagnostic review has been completed and Union Pacific is Traffic as well as possible Quite Zones Sep 2018 currently working on the design of improvements for the Quiet Zones. Complete 85%of scheduled street improvement projects for Fiscal Year Sep 2018 Completed*84%of the planned projects.*Cumulative Total. 2017-18 Capital Projects During the fourth quarter the Street Department completed 18 Complete the 2012 and 2014 bond programs for street improvements Sep 2018 bond segments. The total for this fiscal year is 49 segments and 18 non-bond funded segments.The combined total for this fiscal year is 67 segments. Economic Development returned 1 RFP response in Q4,bringing Actively recruit prospects from target industries,as identified by the the total responses to 14,or 70%of the FY17-18 target.Note: Econ Development Economic Development Partnership Board Sep 2018 RFPs are issued by the Governor's Office of Economic • 3:ECONOMIC Development or the Dallas Regional Chamber.We can only DEVELOPMENT respond if Denton meets the site criteria in the RFPs. Development Implement recommendations to improve the development review and Development Services has implemented a majority of the Services building inspections processes Dec 2017 consultants recommendations.Staff expects all of the accepted recommendations to be completed by March 2019. 58 STRATEGIC PLAN - WORK PLAN DASHBOARD 2017-18 FOCUSTARGET KEY • DATE QTR Development Services staff has continued meeting with the Complete the Denton Code 2030 Update June 2018 Development Code Review Committee in crafting the Denton ECONOMIC a Development Development Code update.There were a total of 14 meetings DEVELOPMENT Services held in Fiscal Year 2017-2018. Complete updates to building standards and design policies under the June 2018 Staff has continued to receive public comments and will be City's Site Design Criteria Manual and related documents adopted in conjunction with the Denton Development Code. Waiting on Brinkley Sargent Wigintion Architect's concept plan. In the meantime,other minor improvements have been made Complete remodel of the Public Safety Communications Center Sep 2018 to facility to include,new paint,new refrigerator and microwave. Additionally,staff is moving towards replacing Public Safety dispatch consoles. Purchase and implement a new Computer Aided Dispatch(CAD)system Police,Fire and Technology Services are currently evaluating to upgrade technology and improve public safety response,data and June 2018 demos from other cities during the month of November. The records committee anticipates a decision to be made on CAD vendor by end of December. Station Alerting is a multi-year strategy with US Digital Designs. Equipment has been installed at Stations:1,4,5,6,and S.Funding Implement an Automatic Fire Station Alerting System Sep 2018 for Station 7 was approved as supplemental request for the FY 18-19 Budget. The Fire Department is currently working on obtaining updated quotes for installation. KFA 4-SAFE LIVEABLE Fire Add on Fire Medic unit in the Northeast Denton area June 2018 The Medic unit at Station 4 is in service. The training facility project had substantial completion at the • end of September 2018. A grand opening will be held in the fall Complete construction of Fire Station#4 March 2018 of 2018.Classes will begin the week of October 8,2018. Upcoming classes include a department wide Standpipe Class in the Tower and Live Fire Training the first full week of November 2018. Use GIS mapping to determine population distribution in relation to City Sep 2018 Staff is working with GIS to provide maps. recreational amenities Playgrounds delivered.Work in progress for Milam,Denia,and Implement recommendations from Denton Parks playground Sep 2018 Fred Moore playgrounds.Estimated completion is Dec.2018. replacement plan Delayed from original estimate due to weather. In partnership with the Denton County Homeless Leadership Team(HLT),the Mayor,Council Member K.Briggs,and CD staff Community y Continue partnership with the Denton County Homeless Leadership contributed a total of 17 hours at HLT meetings and planning team to collect and analyze data on housing and service needs Sep 2018 sessions.City Staff contributed a minimum of 91 additional Development Y g hours to support the HLT through the HILT Ad-Hoc,Housing,and Data Workgroups in meetings and in activities to collect and analyze data on housing and service needs. 59 STRATEGIC PLAN - WORK PLAN DASHBOARD 2017-18 FOCUSKEY • TARGET QTR DATE Development Services continues to receive feedback,educate stakeholders on the Denton Development Code Update,Public Develop a comprehensive public education program to educate Sep 2018 Draft and Draft Zoning Map,adoption of the 2018 building residents on code requirements construction&fire codes and updated food establishment Development rules.The Department continues to develop a comprehensive Services public education outreach program. COMMUNITY During the fourth quarter Development Services staff continue Engage homeowner's associations and neighborhood groups to improve to attend special events and neighborhood meetings,receiving neighborhoods through code compliance Sep 2018 feedback on the DDC update and Draft Zoning Map,and promoting the Neighborhood Project Matching Grant. ' The Denton Energy Center(DEC)construction is 100% complete. DME received notification from ERCOT on July 11, 2018 that the DEC had successfully passed the final step in the ERCOT Resource Commissioning Requirements and that it was officially approved for participation in ERCOT market Electric Complete construction of the Denton Energy Center Sep 2018 operations. Security wall fencing and overall site restoration activities were ongoing and are targeted to be complete in first Quarter of FY18/19. Approximately 94%of originally budgeted DEC project funds have been expended. Final new construction punch list items are being knocked out,and a few initial warranty services have commenced. The landfill cell construction was completed in Q2,and waste Solid Waste Complete construction of Cell 3 to expand capacity at the landfill Sep 2018 disposal activities have commenced in the new cell.The project is complete. STEWARDSHIPEnvironmental Staff has completed draft is working on design of document for Engage the community and update the City's 2012 Sustainability Plan March 2018 Services presentation to public DME's progress towards contracting 100%renewable energy by 2020 has continued through Q4 with additional renewable (resource readiness preparation for solar and participation in solicitations for additional renewable supply offers.DME anticipates that more supply contracts will be ready for Ele Review the City's renewable energy portfolio and present options to Dec 2017 approval by City Council and executed prior to calendar year increase renewable energy end,ensuring that the 2020 objective remains on track.DME continuously assesses the market place and technologies,for opportunities to secure renewable resources,that are operationally effective,at price levels and with terms that will be incrementally valuable to the rate payers and citizens of Denton. 60 r 1 y low- Sculpture by James Surls at the Civic Center 61 Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-185 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: On November 26, 2018, Council Member Armintor submitted an email requesting further details on the landfill permit expenses summarized in an informal staff report presented to City Council on October 26, 2018 (attached as Exhibit 1). Specifically, Council Member Armintor requested that staff provide the dates associated with each expense and an assessment of whether those expenses would have been incurred if the City of Denton were not pursuing the landfill expansion permit. BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION: The below table was provided in the October 26, 2018 Friday Report and summarizes the expenditures associated with the landfill expansion permitting process. Company Services Fee Engineering, Ground Water, Environmental, Chian, Patel &Yerby and Air Permitting $1,319,102.40 Parkhill, Smith& Cooper Engineering $328,510.00 Gosselink, Rochelle & Townsend Legal $377,277.95 Coleman&Associates Surveying $32,009.25 Applied Ecological Services Ecological Report $45,263.54 Weaver Consulting Group Air Permitting $5,000.00 Lee Engineering Traffic Study $22,890.00 Kleinfelder Geotechnical $1,800.00 Total $2,131,853.14 The dates associated with each expenditure have been provided with this report (attached as Exhibit 2). In response to Council Member Armintor's second question, staff reviewed sample invoices (highlighted in Exhibit 2) to determine whether the expenses were associated with the landfill permit application. Based on the samples reviewed, staff can confirm that those expenses were incurred as a result of the landfill permitting process. Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions or concerns. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1 —ISR 2018-155 Landfill Expansion Permitting Process Exhibit 2—Landfill Permit Expenses STAFF CONTACT: Ethan Cox Director of Solid Waste (940) 349-7421 Ethan.C oxkcityofdenton.com Date: October 26,2018 Report No. 2018-155 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: The City Council has requested an update on the landfill expansion permitting process. The information below provides a brief history of the City of Denton Landfill, an overview of the landfill permitting process and public notifications within that process, and where the City of Denton currently stands within the amendment process. DISCUSSION: The City of Denton Landfill is a Type 1 Municipal Solid Waste Facility, currently holding Permit #1590-A through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Based on current waste tonnage and future growth projects, staff estimates that the 207 acres allotted for disposal in Permit#1590-A will be depleted by 2028. To address the community's future waste disposal needs, the City filed for an amendment to the current permit in January 2017. This expansion will result in an increase of 173.64 acres within the permit boundary and 107.64 acres of waste footprint for total areas of 402.54 and 261.41 acres, respectively when added to the current footprint. Taking into consideration the historical and estimated future waste acceptance rates, including local and regional population growth, the landfill will have a remaining life of approximately 71.7 years (last year of operation is approximately the year 2088) if the permit is amended as requested. The permit amendment application proposes a vertical and lateral expansion of the waste limits, and a lateral expansion of the permit boundary. The majority of the expansion will occur to the north of the existing landfill,the planned expansion will all take place on property that is currently owned by the City. The boundaries were selected based on property lines, flood plain considerations, an Atmos gas line to the north of the site, and other geographic restrictions. Based on landfill records and an aerial survey, the remaining waste capacity after Permit Amendment approval is approximately 40,288,920 cubic yards. The expansion is filed under Permit#1590-B. Table 1 shows the current costs related to the permitting process. To-date, the City of Denton has expended over$2.1 million to permit this expansion for environmental services,engineering,legal, permitting, and other services. Date: October 26,2018 Report No. 2018-155 Company Services Fee Engineering, Ground Water, Environmental, Chian, Patel &Yerby and Air Permitting $1,319,102.40 Parkhill, Smith& Cooper Engineering $328,510.00 Gosselink, Rochelle & Townsend Legal $377,277.95 Coleman&Associates Surveying $32,009.25 Applied Ecological Services Ecological Report $45,263.54 Weaver Consulting Group Air Permitting $5,000.00 Lee Engineering Traffic Study $22,890.00 Kleinfelder Geotechnical $1,800.00 Total $2,131,853.14 Table 1. Breakdown of permitting costs The Permit is currently under technical review by the TCEQ. During this portion of the process, TCEQ issues requests for clarification on the application and asks for revisions to the permit submission. City staff then formulates responses to the agency's requests as the two parties fine- tune the specifics of the application. The most recent responses from the City were sent to TCEQ in August. Although circumstance may apply,the TCEQ follows the following basic process for public notice of a Type 1 MSW landfill permit application: 1)TCEQ will issue a Notice of Receipt of Application and Intent to Obtain Permit(NORI). When the administrative review of the application is complete, this notice is mailed to the City for publishing and to required mailing list of government officials and certain landowners. The NORI will give details of where you can look at a hard copy of the permit application, and also contains links to the MSW permit applications portion of the TCEQ website. This notice was posted in the Denton Record-Chronicle on April 3, 2017. 2) Once the NORI is mailed, the public may start submitting comments. Requests for a public meeting or a contested case hearing can also be made,as well as requests to be added to the mailing list for future notices. Public commenting is still available on the TCEQ website under permit number 1590B, and a hard copy is available to view through the City Secretary's office. 3) After the permit is deemed technically complete and the executive director has made a preliminary decision, TCEQ will issue notices requesting comments from members of the public. This is sent in the form of a Notice of Application and Preliminary Decision (NAPD). This notice is mailed to a list of government officials and certain landowners, anyone who submitted comments,requested a public meeting or contested case hearing, or requested to be on the mailing list for future notices. The public comment period typically ends 30 days from the publication date of the NAPD. The publication date is significant because TCEQ only considers timely filed comments. Date: October 26,2018 Report No. 2018-155 The TCEQ gathers all comments received at the end of the public comment period and responds as they are able. Once all of the comments have been responded to, the TCEQ will create a document called the "response to comments" and will send that document to everyone who submitted a comment or requested to be added to the mailing list. Additionally, someone may request a public meeting for the landfill expansion. If this meeting is held, the public may ask TCEQ staff and the City of Denton staff questions regarding the permit, and give comments. Anyone may ask for a public meeting any time between the date the NORI is mailed and the end of the comment period. As stated above, the City of Denton is currently in the technical review portion of the permitting process. Staff expects the permit to be approved in 2019. BACKGROUND: Originally, the City of Denton Landfill was permitted(#1590) in 1984 and began accepting waste on March 13, 1985. The original pre-subtitle D landfill design included approximately 2.4 million cubic yards of air space, and was estimated to have a life of 28 years. In 1996, the City of Denton amended the landfill's waste permit to include additional space for disposal of waste.The Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission approved MSW Permit #1590-A in 1997,which added 207 acres onto the permit limit,and expanded the permitted landfill to approximately 243 acres The Landfill has continues operations under this permit since that time. Two significant modifications to the Permit since 1997 allowed for 1) Enhanced Leachate Recirculation techniques in 2009, and 2)construction and operation of a grease and grit trap waste processing facility in October of 2013. Throughout the years, as the city continued to grow, Solid Waste &Recycling has seen increases in tonnage of waste that is handled and buried in the landfill. Table 2 shows the tonnage of waste accepted to be processed in the landfill over the past 10 years as broken down by the source. • "Commercial Collections" refers to the amount of waste (in tons) collected by the Solid Waste commercial division within city limits. • "Residential Collections" refers to the amount of waste (in tons) collected by the Solid Waste residential division within city limits. • "Landfill—City Department"refers to the amount of waste (in tons)brought to the landfill by internal City of Denton departments. • "Landfill —Denton Resident/Business" refers to the amount of waste (in tons) brought to the landfill by residents or businesses located within city limits. • "Landfill—Non-Denton Resident/Business"refers to the amount of waste(in tons)brought to the landfill by entities that are not located within Denton. • "Landfill—Wholesale"refers to the amount of waste (in tons)that is collected and brought to landfill by outside waste haulers. Date: October 26,2018 Report No. 2018-155 Waste Tonnage by Source FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Commercial Collections 70,845 62,796 67,979 63,294 67,015 Residential Collections 22,015 22,394 22,235 22,428 22,171 Landfill-City Department 2,945 3,206 2,443 1,346 1,268 Landfill-Denton Resident/Business 11,056 10,335 12,154 12,919 14,498 Landfill-Non-Denton Resident/Business 4,225 4,037 4,405 4,963 5,741 Landfill-Wholesale 50,563 40,364 38,620 58,805 63,455 Total Waste Tonnage 1 161,648 143,132 147,837 163,755 174,148 Waste Tonnage by Source FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Commercial Collections 70,936 76,553 81,991 83,928 85,349 Residential Collections 22,709 24,081 25,253 26,382 26,502 Landfill-City Department 4,374 7,640 7,895 1,609 5,376 Landfill-Denton Resident/Business 21,585 23,468 29,295 50,683 49,304 Landfill-Non-Denton Resident/Business 6,012 5,432 10,073 5,349 9,897 Landfill-Wholesale 70,079 100,152 99,416 101,698 103,574 Total Waste Tonnage 195,695 237,325 253,923 269,648 279,984 Table 2. Waste tonnage by source. The department also places an emphasis on recycling and waste diversion from the landfill through various programs, education, and public outreach. Table 3 shows the tons of materials that have been recycled over the past 10 years as a result of those efforts. Some programs have been created within the 10 year period, which is why that data is left blank. Recycling/Diversion by Source FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Residential Collections 7,211 7,001 7,207 7,225 7,482 Commercial Collections 1,577 2,047 2,518 2,295 2,846 Yard Waste for Dyno,Dirt 16,003 18,042 16,526 15,906 19,778 Diverted Sludge (for Dyno Dirt) 2,833 3,209 3,411 3,788 3,817 Commercial Organics - - - - - Home Chemical Collection - - - - - Drug Disposal Kiosk - - - - - Building Materials Recovery - - - 777 1,776 Rubble (Asphalt, Concrete, Brick)* 1,430 5,328 5,926 2,395 37,719 Total Recycled/Diverted Tonnage 29,054 35,627 35,588 32,416 73,418 *Staff estimates that only 10%of these volumes were diverted. The remainder of the material remains onsite and may require disposal. Date: October 26,2018 Report No. 2018-155 Recycling/Diversion by Source FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Residential Collections 7,704 7,625 8,153 7,986 5,979 Commercial Collections 3,110 3,843 3,789 3,646 2,930 Yard Waste for Dyno Dirt 18,255 24,620 24,884 27,044 23,469 Diverted Sludge (for Dyno 3,302 4,096 3,713 4,343 4,312 Dirt Commercial Organics 380 439 487 427 371 Home Chemical Collection 7 46 46 63 61 Drug Disposal Kiosk - 2 2 1 2 Building Materials Recovery 7,963 8,709 1,869 1,155 789 Rubble (Asphalt, Concrete, 46,934 38,542 70,800 77,979 67 580 Brick)* ' Total Recycled/Diverted 87,655 87,922 113,743 122,644 105,493 Tonnage *Staff estimates that only 10%of these volumes were diverted. The remainder of the material remains onsite and may require disposal. Table 3. Recycling and Diversion tonnage by source. In regard to future volume projections, staff anticipates residential and commercial growth to remain steady at approximately 2% per year. In terms of landfill and recycling tonnage, the recycling market will play a key role in Solid Waste's volumes. In January 2018, China banned the import of recyclable materials from foreign countries. Approximately 31% of domestic recyclable materials were being exported to China before the ban, and China's decision has resulted in significant changes in the recycling commodities market. While Denton's relationship with Pratt Industries, owner of Denton's onsite material recovery facility, has insulated the City from significant financial losses, the excess supply of recyclables in the commodities market means contaminated materials may be landfilled at a higher rate until the recycling market recovers. As a result, it is a priority for the City to decrease recycling contamination for both residential and commercial waste streams. STAFF CONTACT: Ethan Cox Director of Solid Waste 940-349-7421 Ethan.Cox(a,cityofdenton.com 1590-B Landfill Permit Invoices by Date Chiang Patel & Yerby (CP&Y) Engineering, Ground Water, Environmental, and Air Permitting Invoice Date Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Amount 6/9/2011 2,825.84 5/5/2014 40,872.20 7/7/2011 5,366.00 6/9/2014 16,732.24 8/4/2011 24,485.27 7/11/2014 14,668.00 9/9/2011 6,166.53 8/8/2014 44,149.50 10/5/2011 1,204.33 9/2/2014 8,089.96 11/2/2011 4,758.00 10/7/2014 9,258.65 12/5/2011 185,339.70 11/4/2014 7,980.00 1/5/2012 7,424.28 12/2/2014 4,600.20 2/6/2012 11,318.83 1/6/2015 526.00 3/9/2012 19,397.01 2/5/2015 4,286.50 4/4/2012 63,902.94 3/9/2015 4,399.00 5/7/2012 14,067.79 4/21/2015 3,887.50 6/4/2012 44,377.27 5/5/2015 3,832.50 7/9/2012 25,269.38 6/2/2015 31,121.25 8/7/2012 24,267.00 7/8/2015 14,627.50 9/10/2012 9,945.00 8/7/2015 9,352.50 10/8/2012 12,500.50 9/10/2015 10,437.50 11/7/2012 30,101.00 10/6/2015 23,912.50 12/7/2012 31,242.52 11/4/2015 21,247.14 1/3/2013 15,594.00 12/9/2015 5,493.90 2/8/2013 17,321.93 1/12/2016 8,218.34 3/4/2013 7,017.00 2/8/2016 16,856.00 4/4/2013 15,773.00 3/9/2016 11,162.04 5/3/2013 1,400.00 3/9/2016 -11,162.04 6/4/2013 18,357.05 3/22/2016 11,162.04 7/3/2013 29,989.00 5/13/2016 3,849.38 8/5/2013 28,762.50 9/11/2017 6,452.00 9/10/2013 36,833.17 9/11/2017 16,856.50 10/7/2013 4,201.00 9/11/2017 295.00 11/1/2013 26,238.50 10/10/2017 858.00 12/4/2013 56,406.60 12/6/2017 22,000.00 1/3/2014 73,474.90 12/11/2017 16,263.00 2/13/2014 35,540.50 1/9/2018 8,211.00 3/5/2014 23,251.26 3/8/2018 400.00 4/8/2014 11,637.00 5/10/2018 2,450.00 Gosselink Rochelle &Townsend Legal Services Invoice Date Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Amount 8/27/2011 6,281.67 1/21/2015 8,116.85 8/27/2011 0.01 1/21/2015 8,567.38 9/30/2011 3,799.80 2/21/2015 2,493.10 10/27/2011 1,084.59 3/20/2015 11,253.00 1/30/2012 176.00 3/20/2015 1,761.60 2/26/2012 368.58 4/26/2015 5,088.20 6/28/2012 167.50 4/26/2015 6,103.80 7/30/2012 678.50 6/25/2015 11,100.50 8/25/2012 335.00 6/25/2015 4,576.00 9/29/2012 2,632.10 7/17/2015 14,154.20 10/28/2012 955.00 7/17/2015 10,113.60 11/30/2012 1,752.02 8/22/2015 1,164.00 12/30/2012 201.00 8/22/2015 3,062.00 3/1/2013 67.00 9/19/2015 4,767.50 3/29/2013 670.00 9/19/2015 3,628.50 4/21/2013 33.50 10/18/2015 2,055.00 5/25/2013 1,239.50 10/18/2015 2,436.00 6/30/2013 804.00 5/26/2017 1,337.50 9/20/2013 3,172.00 6/14/2017 190.00 10/30/2013 5,125.50 7/23/2017 804.00 11/27/2013 560.00 7/23/2017 2,275.12 12/25/2013 8,337.72 7/23/2017 720.38 1/22/2014 11,262.89 9/20/2017 3,069.00 2/20/2014 9,607.03 8/30/2017 5,783.90 2/20/2014 35,395.16 11/25/2017 6,159.50 3/30/2014 20,689.10 1/28/2018 11,233.76 4/30/2014 17,560.40 2/23/2018 5,646.90 5/22/2014 604.84 3/30/2018 2,335.44 5/22/2014 7,680.76 3/30/2018 710.56 6/29/2014 16,658.56 4/20/2018 1,199.00 7/25/2014 4,377.00 5/25/2018 525.00 8/28/2014 1,882.30 6/15/2018 1,341.00 9/24/2014 12,776.43 7/14/2018 330.00 10/30/2014 14,643.40 8/16/2018 1,346.00 11/23/2014 9,792.30 9/20/2018 8,490.00 12/24/2014 6,512.00 Parkhill Smith & Cooper, Inc. (PSC) Engineering Services Invoice Date Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Amount 5/11/2016 5,938.80 8/11/2017 57,970.00 6/14/2016 47,227.20 9/13/2017 24,385.00 7/7/2016 11,135.25 10/5/2017 3,957.00 8/16/2016 20,501.75 11/7/2017 9,233.00 9/15/2016 7,423.50 12/8/2017 5,935.50 10/6/2016 2,227.05 1/18/2018 4,616.50 11/5/2016 3,340.58 2/17/2018 4,600.00 2/10/2017 1,855.87 3/13/2018 19,300.00 3/15/2017 19,785.00 4/19/2018 13,124.00 4/18/2017 7,914.00 5/10/2018 16,176.00 5/11/2017 5,276.00 6/18/2018 8,140.00 6/14/2017 2,638.00 7/20/2018 6,660.00 7/11/2017 3,190.00 9/24/2018 5,960.00 Coleman & Associates Surveying Services Invoice Date Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Amount 4/17/2014 3,135.00 11/30/2015 4,830.00 8/22/2014 6,198.75 3/24/2016 3,142.50 6/18/2015 952.50 3/27/2018 1,900.00 7/30/2015 8,008.00 6/6/2018 3,842.50 Applied Ecological Services Ecological Report Invoice Date Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Amount 10/30/2015 3,500.00 12/30/2015 1.00 10/30/2015 12,603.95 1/30/2016 1,402.50 10/30/2015 3,157.50 1/30/2016 7,683.75 11/29/2015 3,129.59 3/1/2016 2,285.54 12/30/2015 896.05 3/1/2016 3,097.50 12/30/2015 840.54 3/1/2016 1,659.46 12/30/2015 1,370.41 3/30/2016 1,213.96 12/30/2015 1.00 3/30/2016 2,419.79 12/30/2015 1.00 Weaver Consulting Group Air Permitting Invoice Date Invoice Amount 7/15/2016 5,000.00 Lee Engineering Traffic Stud Invoice Date Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Amount 12/27/2012 2,760.00 4/25/2014 1,380.00 3/29/2013 4,140.00 11/29/2014 2,590.00 5/30/2013 3,450.00 8/13/2015 5,850.00 6/29/2013 2,070.00 1/21/2016 650.00 Kleinfelder Geotechnical Engineering Services Invoice Date Invoice Amount Invoice Date Invoice Amount 4/25/2008 1,000.00 1/22/2009 800.00 Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-186 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Information regarding the Fireside Park development following a meeting held on December 12, 2018. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A public meeting to discuss upcoming capital improvements to Hinkle Drive was held on Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at Northlakes Park. Engineering and Planning staff attended the meeting to answer questions regarding the future improvements and a recently approved development for single-family dwellings on approximately 30.7 acres located on the southwest corner of West Windsor Drive and Hinkle Drive. At the meeting, residents expressed concerns regarding the development, particularly the proposed use and traffic impacts to the neighborhood to the east. The following is a brief outline of the approvals associated with the 30.7-acre tract. BACKGROUND: 2007 - On February 6, 2007, City Council approved a zoning change from NR-2 to NR-3 with overlay restrictions for approximately 30.7 acres located on the southwest corner of West Windsor Drive and Hinkle Drive. The rezoning increased the density from two dwelling units per acre to three and one-half dwelling units per acre. The overlay conditions did not affect density or permitted uses. The overlay conditions only dealt with "design" related elements, based upon a detailed site plan (Attachment 3), which included single-family detached and townhome dwellings: 1. The woods along the south and east boundary of the site will be preserved. 2. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a decorative finial at the comer of each lot will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the fence will be 50' minimum from the existing curb. Rows of shrubbery between the fence and sidewalk will be installed to obtain privacy. The distance from the fence and back of sidewalk will be a minimum of 12- feet. The developer, and later an H.O.A.,will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of the approximately 3-acre perimeter landscape area. 3. Except for glazing,doors,and trim,the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. 4. The following restrictions and conditions shall apply to single- family detached homes: a. Street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 56 feet. b. Parkway width shall be a minimum of 9 feet. c. Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of 5 feet. d. Front yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet. e. Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 6 feet. f. Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet, except for Rear Entry Garages. g. Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet if garages are accessed through the rear of the property. Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-186 h. Front Entry Garages shall be setback 12 feet from the front most wall of that unit. i. Three-car Garages shall not face the street. With NR-3 district townhomes are permitted with a SUP. The applicant submitted a SUP application for townhomes in 2009, which was City Council denied. While the townhome SUP was denied,the ability to build detached single-family at 3.5 dwelling units per acre was preserved. 2015-In 2015,a new property owner approached the City with a proposed development for single- family homes based upon the permitted density of 3.5 dwelling units from the 2007 rezoning. The owner determined that some of the overlay restrictions would limit the proposed development which was intended to be for adults aged 55 and older. As a result, they submitted a rezoning application to amend the 2007 overlay restrictions. The restrictions removed were design-related and the only new condition had to do with ensure the bike lanes on Hinkle remained. The applicant noticed and held one neighborhood meeting, which was attended by approximately 26 residents. Prior to the public hearing at the Planning and Zoning Commission and the public hearing at City Council, notification in accordance with the Texas Local Government Code was published in the Denton Record Chronicle and mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the request. In addition, courtesy notices were mailed to residents within 500 feet and signs were placed on the property informing the public of the application. As part of the application to amend the overlay conditions, the applicant requested to remove condition 1 and modify conditions 2 and 4 from the 2007 approval, resulting in the following overlay conditions: 1. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a cast stone column cap every 24 feet will be installed along the perimeter of the site. 2. The setback of the proposed homes will be 50 feet minimum from the existing curb. The developer, and later a homeowner's association, will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of all open spaces and site amenities. 3. Except for glazing,doors,and trim,the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. 4. Three-car Garages shall not face the public or private right-of-way where the entrance /address is located. 5. Any ingress or egress to the subject property shall not remove the on-street bike lane on Hinkle Drive The applicant's justification for the overlay modification and discussion of the item at the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council centered around the applicants intent to develop a single-family detached subdivision age-restricted to 55 and over (Attachment 1). While the majority of the discussion had to do with the age-restriction, no limitations were included in the approval (Attachment 2). As a result, staff is not able to enforce a limitation related to an age- restriction. Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-186 Both in 2007 and 2015,the zoning was consistent with the Future Land Use map. Typically,when a zoning request is determined to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, a traffic analysis is not required. Subsequent to the 2015 modification, the applicant obtained preliminary plat approval on November 18, 2015 (see Figure 1). The preliminary plat included 101 single-family lots and open space in a gated community. The typical lot size was 67 feet by 85 feet (5,695 square feet). The final plat was approved in January 2016, however it expired in January 2018 and the property was not developed. The Preliminary Plat and the Final Plat had no note relative to any age restriction. _ -- ! " Imo► - l 4 40 _ -- ' �_ ' :ram' t �• - AW - �*-.- re fitriI'_ - .raw ! tr W— = Figure 1. Preliminary Plat(PP14-0032)approved on November 18, Figure 2.Final Plat(FP15-0033)for Phase 1 approved January 13, 2016. 2016. 2017/2018 - By 2018, the ownership of the property changed again and a new Preliminary Plat/Final Plat was submitted to the City. This plat was based upon the zoning approved in 2007 and included 107 single-family lots with public streets and drainage improvements. Per the plat, the typical lot size is about 60 feet by 120 (7,200 square feet) and all the conditions from 2015 overlay approval were addressed. Additionally, the plat did not contain any notes related to age restriction for residents. The Final Plat(FP18-0019)was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 22, 2018 and filed of record on November 20, 2018. 1 iy i Figure 3. Current Preliminary Plat(PP17-0028)approved on Figure 4.Current Final Plat(FP18-0019)approved on August 22, March 21,2018. 2018. Date: December 14,2018 Report No. 2018-186 AGE-RESTRICTED HOUSING AS A USE: The City does not have "age-restricted housing" as a use in the residential use tables. Within the institutional use table, there is an"Elderly Housing"use. In order to qualify for this use a license from the State of Texas is required and on-site care must be provided to residents. This is in addition to the age limitation. The distinction between an "age-restricted" and an "elderly housing" primarily has to do with independent living. The City Attorney has indicated that if a separate use for age-restricted housing is desired, the use could be included in the Denton Development Code residential use table. Robson Ranch would be an example of an age-restricted housing use, as the residents' age is limited,but there is not an onsite care component. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2015 AIS and Staff Report 2. 2015 Zoning Ordinance 3. 2007 Zoning Ordinance and Staff Report STAFF CONTACT: Julie Wyatt Senior Planner, Development Services 940-349-8585 Julie.W attkcityofdenton.com AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: July 21, 2015 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development ACM: Jon Fortune SUBJECT— Z15-0005 (Fireside Park) Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance to the City of Denton, Texas, amending Ordinance No. 2007-032 which provided for a zoning change to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district classification and use designation along with an overlay district, in order to modify conditions related to design criteria in the overlay on approximately 31 acres of land generally located on the southwest corner of Hinkle Drive and Windsor Street in the City of Denton, Denton County; and providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of$2,000.00 for violations thereof; providing a severability clause and an effective date. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this request(6-1), subject to conditions. BACKGROUND In 2007, the subject property was rezoned from Neighborhood Residential 2 District (NR-2) to NR-3 District with overlay conditions to restrict the development of the site. The applicant would like to develop the subject property into 101 single-family dwellings as an age-restricted neighborhood for active adults. This proposed development is intended to be a gated community designed to address residents' safety concerns with open visibility and secure walking trails. However, the overlay conditions imposed during the 2007 rezoning would restrict the applicant's ability to create a secure development specifically geared to an age restricted active adult community. This request does not change the underlying zoning of NR-3 District, its permitted uses, or maximum density, but rather removes or amends the existing design conditions. Further analysis on the specific overlay conditions and the proposed modifications is detailed in the attached Staff Report. Staff has analyzed the proposal and has determined that it conforms to the conditions for approval set forth in Section 35.3.4 of the Denton Development Code (DDC), is compatible with the adjacent land uses, and meets the goals of the Denton Plan 2030. The Future Land Use designation of the subject property is Low Density Residential, which includes single-family neighborhoods with densities up to 4 dwelling units per acre. Since the request would not change the underlying zoning designation from NR-3, the purpose, permitted uses, and maximum density, would remain the same, resulting in a development pattern that is consistent with the Low Density Residential designation. Agenda Information Sheet July 21, 2015 Page 2 To comply with the public hearing notice requirements, 28 notices were sent to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property, 96 courtesy notices were sent to physical addresses within 500 feet of the subject property, a notice was published in the Denton Record Chronicle, and signs were placed on the property. As of the writing of this staff report, staff has received one response in opposition and one neutral response for the rezoning request. The applicant also hosted a neighborhood meeting on May 21, 2015, and Concerns included increased traffic, drainage, and improvements to Hinkle Drive. OPTIONS 1. Approve as submitted. 2. Approve subject to conditions. 3. Deny. 4. Postpone consideration. 5. Table item. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this request (6-1), subject to conditions: 1. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a cast stone column cap every 24 feet will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the proposed homes will be 50 feet minimum from the existing curb. The developer, and later a homeowner's association, will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of all open spaces and site amenities. 2. Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. 3. Three-car Garages shall not face the street. 4. Any ingress or egress to the subject property shall not remove or affect the on-street bike lane on Hinkle Drive. Staff recommends approval of this request with the following modifications to the conditions: 1. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a cast stone column cap every 24 feet will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the proposed homes will be 50 feet minimum from the existing curb. The developer, and later a homeowner's association, will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of all open spaces and site amenities. Agenda Information Sheet July 21, 2015 Page 3 2. Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. 3. Three-car Garages shall not face the street. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW A public hearing was held at the June 17, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. EXHIBITS I. Staff Report 2. Aerial Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Future Land Use Map 5. Ordinance No 2007-032 6. Public Notification Map and Community Responses 7. Planning and Zoning Meeting Minutes from June 17, 2015 8. Draft Ordinance Respectfully submitted: Aimee Bissett Interim Director, Planning and Development Prepared by: Julie Wyatt Associate Planner �1CiPlanning Report CITY, Z15-0005/Fireside Park `'I ty Council District 3 DENTONPlanning & Zoning Commission June 17, 2015 REQUEST: Consider making a recommendation to City Council amending Ordinance No. 2007-032 which provided for a zoning change to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district classification and use designation along with an overlay district, in order to modify conditions related to design criteria in the overlay. OWNER/APPLICANT: Bill Haney, Fireside Custom Homes, LLC BACKGROUND: The applicant would like to develop the subject property into 101 single-family dwellings as an age-restricted neighborhood for active adults. The proposed development is intended to be a gated community designed to address residents' safety concerns with open visibility and secure walking trails. In 2007, the subject property was rezoned from Neighborhood Residential 2 District (NR-2) to NR-3 District with overlay conditions to restrict the development of the site. SITE DATA: The subject property is approximately 31 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Hinkle Road and West Windsor Drive. The parcel is irregularly shaped and has approximately 1,250 feet of frontage on West Windsor Drive and 1,411 feet of frontage on Hinkle Road. There are no trees on the site and the property is undeveloped. USE OF PROPERTY UNDER CURRENT ZONING: The proposal will not change the permitted uses or density on the subject property. NR-3 District is intended for single-family uses with a maximum density of 3.5 dwelling units per acre. As the development is greater than two acres, there are no minimum lot sizes stipulated in the Denton Development Code (DDC). Attached single-family dwellings, Accessory Dwelling Units, Daycares and Elementary Schools are permitted with a Specific Use Permit (SUP). Parks, open space, and religious institutions are permitted by right. SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USES: North: Property to the north is zoned NR-2 District, Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 District (NRMU-12) and Neighborhood Residential 4 District (NR-4). The NR-2 District and a portion of the NRMU-12 District are developed with North Lakes Park. The NR-4 District and the balance of the NRMU-12 District are developed with residential uses. East: Property to the east is zoned NR-3 District and NRMU-12 District. The NR-3 District is developed with a single family use. The NRMU-12 District is developed with Elderly Housing. South: The property to the south is zoned NR-2 District and is developed with Elderly Housing. West: Property to the west is zoned NR-2 District and is developed as Bowling Green Park. COMPATIBILITY OF REQUEST WITH SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USES: The purpose of the current zoning is to preserve and protect existing neighborhoods and to ensure that any new development is compatible with existing land uses, patterns, and design standards. Since the request would not change the zoning designation from NR-3, the purpose, permitted uses, maximum density, and lot coverage would remain the same. The surrounding established neighborhoods are zoned for residential uses and have developed with a residential character, including single-family uses, parks, and elderly housing. The requested modification of the overlay conditions placed on the subject property in 2007 will not negatively impact the existing surrounding neighborhoods, and the proposed age-restricted single-family dwellings are compatible with the adjacent zoning and uses. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Per the Denton Plan 2030, the Future Land Use designation of the subject property is Low Density Residential. This designation includes single-family neighborhoods with densities up to 4 dwelling units per acre. The neighborhoods should be developed "as distinct subdivisions that are linked by internal circulations systems with limited access to local and connector roads." The proposed request conforms to the Future Land Use designation of the subject property. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. This request does not change the underlying zoning of NR-3 District, its permitted uses, or maximum density. 2. The applicant is proposing to develop the approximately 31-acre tract with a gated community for active adults (age restricted). The development would contain 101 single family lots and active recreation in the form a walking trail within the development. The intent is to provide a gated residential complex is to ensure the safety of the residents. 3. As indicated in the Background, the subject property is zoned NR3, but also has an overlay district with specific conditions as they relate to zoning and design criteria. It should be taken into consideration that the zoning criteria referenced in the conditions are in conflict with the DDC and are in fact more onerous and prevent the flexibility in creating a development specifically geared to an age restricted active adult community. 4. The conditions imposed by the overlay comprise; a. The woods along the south and east boundary of the site will be preserved. Planning Report Z15-0005 Page 2 of 7 It should be taken into consideration that the wooded area along the southern and eastern boundaries is not contained with the limits of the property. In addition, the property is not owned by the applicant. This condition should therefore be removed. Furthermore, the wooded area cited is in fact owned by the City of Denton and is parkland. b. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a decorative finial at the corner of each lot will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the fence will be 50 feet minimum from the existing curb. Rows of shrubbery between the fence and the sidewalk will be installed to obtain privacy. The distance from the fence and back of sidewalk will be a minimum of 12 feet. The developer, and later the H.O.A., will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of the approximately 3-acre perimeter landscape area. The condition to install the fence 50 feet from the curb is not a DDC requirement and prevents the applicant from locating a perimeter walking trail within the secured gated community. The applicant proposes to modify this condition to locate the perimeter fence closer to the property line while maintaining a 50-foot setback from the existing curb for the proposed homes. This modified condition permits the 50-foot setback to be used as a walking trail amenity secured between the homes and a perimeter fence. The proposed design criteria condition for the perimeter fence is as follows: a perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a cast stone column cap every 24 feet will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the proposed homes will be 50 feet minimum from the existing curb, although the DDC does not require this setback. The developer, and later a homeowner's association, will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of all open spaces and site amenities. c. Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. Although this condition is more stringent than the DDC requires, the applicant does not propose removing the masonry condition and intends to comply with the condition. d. The following restrictions and conditions shall apply to single-family detached homes: ■ Street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 56 feet. ■ Parkway width shall be a minimum of 9 feet. ■ Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of 5 feet. ■ Front yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet. ■ Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 6 feet. Planning Report Z15-0005 Page 3 of 7 ■ Rear yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet, except for Rear Entry Garages. ■ Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet if garages are accessed through the rear of the property. ■ Front Entry Garages shall be setback 12 feet from the front most wall of that unit. ■ Three-car Garages shall not face the street. These conditions for single-family homes are either redundant or in conflict with requirements outlined in the DDC for the NR-3 District and the Transportation Criteria Manual, and should be removed. The conditions also reduce the applicant's ability to develop the site as proposed. The conditions for street and parkway widths conflict with the City's transportation requirements. According to the Transportation Criteria Manual, Residential Neighborhood Streets require a 50-foot right-of-way and 11-foot parkway widths, as opposed to the overlay conditions for 56-foot right-of-way and 9-foot parkway widths. The 5-foot sidewalk condition is redundant, as a 5-foot sidewalk is required for Residential Neighborhood Streets. The conditions for front and back yard setbacks conflict with the General Regulations for the NR-3 District. Per Section 35.5.2.3 of the DDC front and back yard setbacks only apply for subdivisions under two acres, whereas the conditions require 15-foot front yard setbacks and 10-foot rear yard setbacks. The side yard setback condition is redundant, as a 6-foot side yard is required for non-attached buildings located in the NR-3 District. The overlay condition that three-car garages shall not face the street is neither required nor addressed by the DDC. The applicant intends to comply with this condition. Staff recommends that the overlay conditions should address design criteria only, and that restrictions and conditions which are redundant or conflict with zoning or transportation regulations be removed. The applicant requests that the condition to set back the front entry garage 12 feet from the front most wall be removed, as a 12-foot offset decreases the visibility for residents at individual homes and would be construed as a safety risk. The DDC requires that the front entry garages may not extend forward of the front building wall, and the applicant intends to comply with this regulation. 5. Per Section 35.3.4.B of the DDC, zoning changes may be approved if the proposed rezoning conforms to the Future Land Use element of the Denton Plan 2030, and that the proposed Planning Report Z15-0005 Page 4 of 7 rezoning facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewers, schools, parks, and other public requirements and public convenience. 6. A neighborhood meeting was held on May 21, 2015. Twenty-six people attended the meeting. Concerns included increased traffic, drainage, and improvements to Hinkle Drive. An attendee also suggested that the applicant replace the proposed plants with native plants in the landscaping to reduce water usage. All infrastructure requirements will be addressed during the platting process. 7. The request conforms to the Future Land Use designation of Low Density Residential and meets the goals of the Denton Plan 2030. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested modifications as they are compatible with the surrounding property and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Denton Plan 2030. Staff recommends the following modifications to the conditions; 1. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a cast stone column cap every 24 feet will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the proposed homes will be 50 feet minimum from the existing curb. The developer, and later a homeowner's association, will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of all open spaces and site amenities. 2. Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. 3. Three-car Garages shall not face the street. OPTIONS: 1. Recommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend approval subject to conditions. 3. Recommend denial. 4. Table the item to a date certain. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: To comply with the public hearing notice requirements, 28 notices were sent to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property, 96 courtesy notices were sent to physical addresses within 500 feet of the subject property, a notice was published in the Denton Record Chronicle, and signs were placed on the property. PROJECT TIMELINE: Business Days Business Subject Date under Days out DRC Review to Applicant Application Received April 2,2015 - - Planning Report Z15-0005 Page 5 of 7 1st Submittal sent to DRC Members April 7,2015 - - Comments Released to Applicant April 24,2015 13 - DRC Meeting with Staff Applicant Declined - - 2°d Submittal Sent to DRC Members April 29,2015 3 Comments Released to Applicant May 1,2015 2 Total Business Days 15 3 ATTACHMENTS: • Permitted Uses in Neighborhood Residential 3 • Aerial Map • Zoning Map • Future Land Use Map • Ordinance No 2007-032 • Public Notification Map Prepared By: Reviewed By: Ron Menguita, AICP Development Review Committee Julie Wyatt Administrator Assistant Planner Date: Reviewed By: Munal Mauladad Assistant Director of Planning and Development Date: Planning Report Z15-0005 Page 6 of 7 Permitted Uses in Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) Agriculture Livestock** Single-family Dwellings Accessory Dwelling Units* ** Attached Single-family Dwellings Community Homes for the Disabled Home Occupation Outdoor Recreation Gas Wells* ** Basic Utilities** Parks and Open Space Churches Semi-Public Halls Clubs and Lodges* Adult or Child Day Care* Kindergarten/Elementary School* WECS* *Requires approval of a Specific Use Permit through the public hearing process **Permitted with a Limitation Planning Report Z15-0005 Page 7 of 7 sAlegal\our documents\ordinances\15\715-0005.docx ORDINANCE NO. 01. -217 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2007-032 WHICH PROVIDED FOR A ZONING CHANGE TO A NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL 3 (NR-3) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION ALONG WITH AN OVERLAY DISTRICT, IN ORDER TO MODIFY CONDITIONS RELATED TO DESIGN CRITERIA IN THE OVERLAY ON APPROXIMATELY 31 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HINKLE DRIVE AND WINDSOR STREET IN THE CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S OFFICAL ZONING MAP; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Z15-0005) WHEREAS, Bill Haney, has applied for a zoning change on approximately 31 acres of land legally described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter, the "Property"), amending Ordinance No. 2007-032 which provided for a zoning change to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district classification and use designation along with an overlay district, in order to modify conditions related to design criteria in the overlay; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas, have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and have held due hearings and afforded full and fair hearings to all property owners interested in this regard, and have recommended approval (6-1) of the change in zoning district and use classification; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2015, the City Council likewise conducted a public hearing as required by law, and finds that the request meets and complies with all substantive and procedural standards set forth in Section 35.3.4 of the Denton Development Code, and is consistent with the Denton Plan and the Denton Development Code; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, in considering the application for a change in the zoning classification of the property , have determined that the proposed use is in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the City of Denton, and accordingly, the City Council of the City of Denton is of the opinion and finds that said zoning change is in the public interest and should be granted as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The findings and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are incorporated herein by reference and found to be true. SECTION m2. Ordinance No. 2007-032 which provided for a zoning change to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district classification and use designation along with an overlay district has been amended, subject to the following overlay conditions: 1. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a cast stone column cap every 24 feet will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the proposed homes will be 50 feet minimum from the existing curb. The developer, and later a homeowner's association, will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of all open spaces and site amenities. 2. Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. 3. Three-car Garages shall not face the public or private right-of-way where the entrance/address is located. 4. Any ingress or egress to the subject property shall not remove the on-street bike lane on Hinkle Drive. SECTION 3. The City's official zoning map is hereby amended to show the change in the zoning district and use classification. SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. SECTION 5. Any person, firm, partnership or corporation violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by fine in a sum not exceeding $2,000.00 for each offense. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION 6. That an offense committed before the effective date of this ordinance is governed byprior law and the provisions of the Denton Code of Ordinances, as amended, in effect when the offense was committed and the former law is continued in effect for this purpose. SECTION 7. In compliance with Section 2.09(c) of the Denton Charter, this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, a use newspaper published in the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the o21 day of rx-- ,... , 2015, pxfi7w—, MAY....__ l 9 f: OR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPIRi ( Fl) A, TO LEGAL FORM: ANITA BURGESS, CITY ATTORNEY EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED SITUATED in the city Denton, Denton County Texas, being a tract of land in the N. H. MEISENHEIMER SURVEY, Abstract No. 810 and the ROBERT BEAUMONT SURVEY, Abstract No. 31 and being a portion of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments Ltd., as Tract One in Section 5, in deed recorded in Volume 1796, Page 601 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, and said tract being more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Addition, as shown on plat thereof recorded in Cabinet K, Slide 238, of the Plat Records of Denton County for the southwest corner of a remainder of said Rayzor Investments Tract One in the east line of that certain Tract III conveyed to the City of Denton by deed recorded in Volume 695, Page 669, of said Real Property Records, said point being on a curve whose center bears North 82 degrees, 44 minutes, 43 seconds West, 2293.00 feet, and from said point a ''/2" iron rod found in place bears North 88 degrees, 36 minutes, 20 seconds West, 0.30 foot; THENCE northerly with said curve and said east line of City of Denton Tract III for the west line of said Rayzor tract remainder, passing the northeast corner of said City Tract III and the southeast corner of the certain Tract I conveyed to the City of Denton by said deed recorded in Volume 695, Page 669, and continuing with the east line of said Tract I and said curve, in all a distance of 948.72 feet to a"RPLS 1640" capped 5/8" iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rayzor tract remainder, in the southeasterly line of that certain tract conveyed to the City of Denton as Tract I by deed recorded in Volume 697, Page 207 of said Real Property Records; THENCE North 46 degrees, 19 minutes, 50 seconds East, with the northerly line of said Rayzor tract remainder and said southeasterly line of City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207, at 16.45 feet passing an"RPLS 1640" capped 5/8" iron rod set for reference, crossing the existing pavement of Windsor Drive, a publicly maintained roadway, continuing in all 104.66 feet; THENCE North 71 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East with the common line of said Rayzo-r tract remainder and said City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207, again crossing said Windsor Drive pavement, in all 737.20 feet to the west corner of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments by Correction instrument recorded in Volume 3441, Page 883, of said Real Property Records; THENCE with the northerly and east lines of said Rayzor Investments tract for southerly and west lines of a remainder of said City Tract I recorded in Volume 697, Page 207,the following courses and distances: North 60 degrees, 38 minutes, 10 seconds East, 177367 feet to the beginning of a curve whose center bears South 29 degrees, 21 minutes, 50 seconds East, 484.52 feet; Easterly with said curve 231.94 feet to an"RPLS 164" capped 5/8/" iron rod set for the end of said curve at the northeast corner of said Rayzor tract described in Volume 3441, Page 883; and, South 0 degrees, 53 minutes, 45 seconds West, 24.43 feet to the southeast corner of said Rayzor tract described in Volume 3441, Page 883, in the southerly line of said City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207; THENCE North 71 degrees, 38 minutes, 20 seconds East with said southerly line of City Tract I recorded in Volume 697, Page 207, 15.37 feet to a southeast corner of said City Tract I in the existing pavement of Hinkle Drive, a publicly-maintained roadway. THENCE North 0 degrees, 53 minutes, 45 seconds East with the east line of said City Tract I in said Hinkle Drive pavement, 29.97 feet to the southwest corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to the City of Denton as Tract I in deed recorded in Volume 1163, Page 216, of said Real Property Records; THENCE South 89 degrees, 00 minutes, 30 seconds East, 18.82 feet to the southeast corner of said City Tract I recorded in Volume 1163, Page 216, in the east line of said Rayzor Investments tract and in the occupied center of said Hinkle Drive; THENCE with the said east line of Rayzor Investments tract and said occupied center of Hinkle Drive, South 1 degree, 17 minutes, 30 seconds West, 1282.43 feet, and South 0 degrees, 55 minutes, 25 seconds West, 1464.72 fee to the southeast corner of said Rayzor Investments tract, from which point a"H&N" capped '/z" iron rod bears North 88 degrees, 36 minutes, 20 seconds West, 32.77 feet; THENCE North 88 degrees, 36 minutes, 20 seconds West with the south line of said Rayzor Investments tract remainder, at 30 feet passing the northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Addition and continuing with the north line of said Lot 1, 1078.45 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 30.7036 acres (1,337.448 square feet), of which 0.5298 acre (23.080 square feet) lies within the probable limits of Windsor Drive (base on Windsor Drive being an 80-feet wide right-of-way and the existing pavement being the eastbound (south) lanes of a divided roadway, and 0.9759 acre (42.510 square feet) lies within Hinkle Drive (based on one-half of 60-foot wide right-of-way), leaving a net area of 29.1978 acres (1,271.858 square feet). THIS DESCRIPTION PREPARED TO ACCOMPANY A SURVEY MAP FO THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. SAOur Documents\Ordinances107\Z06-0014.doc ORDINANCE NO. O77 6)2 r AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL 2 (NR-2) TO A NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL 3 (NR-3) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, WITH AN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HINKLE DRIVE AND WINDSOR STREET AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY TEXAS, BEING A TRACT OF LAND IN THE N. H. MEISENHEIMER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 810 AND THE ROBERT BEAUMONT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 31 AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO RAYZOR INVESTMENTS LTD., AS TRACT ONE OF SECTION 5, IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 1796, PAGE 601 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Z06-0014) WHEREAS, Rick Baria has applied for a change in zoning for approximately 30 acres from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR- 3) zoning district classification and use designation: and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2007, the Planning and Zoning Commission concluded a public hearing as required by law, and recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change is consistent with the Denton Plan and the Development Code; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The findings and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are incorporated herein by reference and found to be true. SECTION 2. The zoning district classification and use designation for 30 acres of land described in Exhibit "A", as tract of land situated in the city of Denton, Denton County Texas, being a tract of land in the N. H. Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract No. 810 and the Robert Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 31 and being a portion of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments Ltd., as Tract One in Section 5, in deed recorded in Volume 1796, Page 601 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, which is attached and incorporated for all purposes herein (the "Property"), is hereby changed from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district classification and use designation,with an overlay district containing the following restrictions and conditions: a. The woods along the south and east boundary of the site will be preserved. b. A perimeter fence with a "wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a decorative finial at the corner of each lot will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the fence will be 50' minimum from the existing curb. Rows of shrubbery between the fence and sidewalk will be installed to obtain privacy. The distance from the fence and back of sidewalk will be a minimum of 12-feet. The developer, and later an H.O.A., will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of the approximately 3- acre perimeter landscape area. c. Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. d. The following restrictions and conditions shall apply to single-family detached homes: o Street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 56 feet. o Parkway width shall be a minimum of 9 feet. o Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of 5 feet. o Front yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet. o Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 6 feet. o Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet,except for Rear Entry Garages. o Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet if garages are accessed through the rear of the property. o Front Entry Garages shall be setback 12 feet from the front most wall of that unit. o Three-car Garages shall not face the street. Notwithstanding the above real property description, the property being rezoned includes all property to the centerline of all adjacent street right-or-way. SECTION 3. The City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification and use designation. SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court, such invalidity shall affect the validity of the provisions or applications,and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. SECTION 5. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction,be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, a daily newspaper published in the City of Denton, Texas, within ten(10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the r' day of / , 2007. Pato..,�A CLj_ RR cNEILL,MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: EDWIN M. SNYDER, CITY ATT0 Y z Exhibit A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED SITUATED in the city of Denton, Denton County Texas, being a tract of land in the N. H. MEISENHEIMER SURVEY, Abstract No. 810 and the ROBERT BEAUMONT SURVEY, Abstract No. 31 and being a portion of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments Ltd., as Tract One in Section 5, in deed recorded in Volume 1796, Page 601 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, and said tract being more fully described as follows: BEGINNING a' the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Addition, as shown on plat thereof recorded in Cabinet K, Slide 238, of the Plat Records of Denton County for the southwest corner of a remainder of said Rayzor Investments Tract One in the east line of that certain Tract III conveyed to the City of Denton by deed recorded in Volume 695, Page 669, of said Real Property Records, said point being on a curve whose center Dears North 82 degrees, 44 minutes, 43 seconds West, 2293.00 feet, and from said point a 1/2" !ran rod found in place bears North 88 degrees, 36 minutes, 20 seconds West, 0.30 foot; THENCE northerly with said curve and with said east line of City of Denton Tract III for the west line of said Rayzor tract remainder, passing the northeast corner of said City Tract III and the southeast corner of that certain Tract I conveyed to the City of Denton by said deed recorded in Volume 695, Page 669, and continuing with the east line of said Tract I and said curve, in all a distance of 948.72 feet to a "RPLS 1640" capped 5/8"iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rayzor tract remainder, in the southeasterly line of that certain tract conveyed to the City of Denton as Tract I by deed recorded in Volume 697, Page 207 of said Real Property Records; THENCE North 46 degrees, 19 minutes, 50 seconds East, with the northerly line of said Rayzor tract remainder and said southeasterly line of City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207, at 16.45 feet passing an "RPLS 1640" capped 5/8" iron rod set for reference, crossing the existing pavement of Windsor Drive, a publicly maintained roadway, continuing in all 104.66 feet; THENCE North 71 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East with the common line of said Rayzor tract. remainder and said City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207, again crossing said Windsor Drive pavement,in all 737.20 feet to the west corner of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments by Correction instrument recorded in Volume 3441, Page 883, of,said Real Property Records; THENCE with the northerly and east lines of said Rayzor Investments tract for southerly and west lines of a remainder of said City Tract I recorded in Volume 697, Page 207, the following courses and distances: North 60 degrees, 38 minutes, 10 seconds East, 177.67 feet to the beginning of a curve whose center bears South 29 degrees, 21 minutes, 50 seconds East, 484.52 feet; easterly with said curve 231.94 feet to an "RPLS 1640" capped 5/8" iron rod set for the end of said curve at the northeast corner of said Rayzor tract described in Volume 3441, Page 883;and, South 0 degrees, 53 minutes, 45 seconds West, 24.43 feet to the southeast corner of said Rayzor tract described in Volume 3441, Page 883, in the southerly line of said City Tract in Volume 697, Page 207: THENCE North 71 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East with said southerly line of City Tract I recorded in Volume 697, Page 207, 15.37 feet to a southeast corner of said City Tract I in the existing pavement of Hinkle Drive, a publicly-maintained roadway; THENCE North 0 degrees, 53 minutes, 45 seconds Eost with the east line of said City Tract I in said Hinkle Drive pavement, 29.97 feet to the southwest corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to the City of Denton as Tract 1 in deed recorded in Volume 1163, Page 216, of said Real Property Records; THENCE South 89 degrees, 00 minutes, 30 seconds East, 18.82 feet to the southeast corner of said City Tract 1 recorded in Volume 1163, Page 216, in the east line of said Rayzor Investments tract and in the occupied center of said Hinkle Drive; THENCE with the said east line of Rayzor Investments troct and said occupied center of Hinkle Drive, South 1 degree, 17 minutes,30 seconds West, 1282.43 feet, and South 0 degrees, 55 minutes, 25 seconds West, 146.72 feet to the southeost corner of said Rayzor Investments tract, from which point a "H&N" capped 1/2" iron rod bears North 88 degrees, 36 minutes, 20 seconds West, 32.77 feet; THENCE North 88 degrees, 36 minutes, 20 seconds West with the south line of said Rayzor Investments tract remainder, at 30 feet passing the northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Addition and continuing with the north line of said Lot 1, 1078.45 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 30.7036 acres (1,337,448 square feet), of which 0.5298 acre (23,080 square feet) lies within the probable limits of Windsor Drive (based on Windsor Drive being an 80 foot wide right-of-way and the existing pavement being the eastbound (south) lanes of a divided roadway, and 0.9759 acre (42,510 square feet) lies within Hinkle Drive (based on one-half of a 60 foot wide right-of-way), leaving a net area of 29.1978 acres (1,271,858 square feet). THIS DESCRIPTION PREPARED TO ACCOMPANY A SURVEY MAP OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY mois779jo AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 23, 2007 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development Department ACM: Howard Martin, 349-8232 SUBJECT -Z06-0014 (Parkside Meadows) Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance regarding the rezoning of approximately 30 acres of land from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district. The subject property is generally located at the southwest corner of Hinkle Drive and Windsor Street. BACKGROUND Applicant: Rick Baria Denton, TX The applicant is proposing 89 lots (detached and attached single-family homes) with approximately 3.3-acres woods to be preserved. The proposed rezoning request includes an Overlay District to mitigate the comments from adjacent property owners who are concern about the potential visual impact the proposed project would create. The following are the Overlay District restrictions and conditions: ■ The woods along the south and east boundary of the site will be preserved. ■ A perimeter fence with a"wrought" iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a decorative finial at the corner of each lot will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the fence will be 50' minimum from the curb. Rows of shrubbery between the fence and sidewalk will be installed to obtain privacy. The developer, and later an H.O.A., will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of the approximately 3-acre perimeter landscape area. ■ Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. ■ The following restrictions and conditions shall apply to single-family detached homes: o Street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 56 feet. o Parkway width shall be a minimum of 9 feet. o Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of 5 feet. o Front yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet. o Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 6 feet. o Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet, except for Rear Entry Garages. o Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet if garages are accessed through the rear of the property. o Front Entry Garages shall be setback 12 feet from the front most wall of that unit. o Three-car Garages shall not face the street. In conjunction with the rezoning request the applicant will be applying for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) at a later date to develop attached single-family dwellings (see Exhibit 8). The NR-3 allows attached single-family dwellings with an SUP. The applicant has met with nearby property owners three times, in August, November and December of 2006. The applicant is including an overlay district with the proposed zoning change to address the concerns of the property owners. The majority of the property owners that attended the August and November public meetings are in general acceptance of the zoning change with the overlay district restrictions listed above. Public notification information is provided in Exhibit 6. As of this writing, staff has received four responses from property owners within 200 feet of the subject site. Two are in favor, one is neutral and one is opposed to the zoning change. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW January 10, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing OPTIONS 1. Approve as submitted. 2. Approve subject to conditions. 3. Deny. 4. Table item. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (6-0) of this rezoning request. EXHIBITS 1. Staff Analysis 2. Location Map 3. Existing Zoning Map 4. Proposed Zoning Map 5. Future Land Use Map 6. Notification Map 7. Site Photos 8. Proposed Site Plan 9. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 10, 2007 10. Ordinance Prepared by: X�� Ron Menguita Planner III Respectfully submitted: Brian Lockley, AICP Interim Director of Planning and Development EXHIBIT 1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT STAFF ANALYSIS CASE NO: Z06-0014 DATE TO BE CONSIDERED: January 23, 2007 LOCATION: The property is generally located at the southwest corner of Hinkle Drive and Windsor Street. APPLICANT: Rick Baria 5138 Edwards Road Denton, Texas 76208 OWNER: Rayzor Company 400 West Oak #200 Denton, Texas 76201 REQUEST: Rezone approximately 30 acres of land from N eighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district with an Overlay District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee recommends approval of the rezoning request. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject site is located within an Existing Land DESIGNATION: Use/Infill Compatibility future land use designation. SITE AND SURROUNDINGS: The property is currently undeveloped. North: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) — North Lakes Park South: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) - Alterra House Retirement Home West: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) —floodplain East: Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) — existing residential and Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use12 (NRMU12) —Good Samaritan Village BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The subject property is generally located at the southwest corner of Hinkle Drive and Windsor Street. The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 30 acre s of land from Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district with an Overlay District. ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan Analysis The site is located in the "Existing Residential/Infill Compatibility" future land use area of the Denton Plan. A description of Exis ting Residential/Infill Compatibility reads as follows: "Within established residential areas, new development should respond to existing development with compatible land uses, patterns, and design standards. The plan recommends that existing neighborhoods within the city be vigorously protected and preserved. Housing that is compatible with the existing density, neighborhood service, and commercial land uses is allowed." The proposed NR-3 zoning district is c onsistent with the comprehensive plan designation of Existing Land Use/Infill Compatibility. Development Code/Zoning Analysis The following table highlights the differenc es in uses between the NR-2 and NR-3 zoning districts. Residential Land Use Categories NR-2 NR-3 Agriculture P P Livestock L(7) L(7) Single Family Dwellings P P Accessory Dwelling Units SUP SUP L(1) L(1) Attached Single Family Dwellings N SUP Dwellings Above Businesses N N Live/Work Units N N Duplexes N N Community Homes For the Disabled P P Group Homes N N Multi-Family Dwellings N N Manufactured Housing Developments SUP N Commercial Land Use Categories NR-2 NR-3 Home Occupation P P Sale of Products Grown on Site N N Hotels N N Motels N N Bed and Breakfast N N Retail Sales and Service N N Movie Theaters N N Restaurant or Private Club N N Drive-through Facility N N Professional Services and Offices N N Quick Vehicle Servicing N N Vehicle Repair N N Auto and RV Sales N N Laundry Facilities N N Equestrian Facilities SUP N Outdoor Recreation P P Indoor Recreation N N Major Event Entertainment N N Commercial Parking Lots N N Administrative or Research Facilities N N Broadcasting of Production Studio N N Sexually Oriented Business N N Temporary Uses L(38) L(38) CategoriesIndustrial Land Use Printing/Publishing N N Bakeries N N Manufacture of Non-odoriferous Foods N N Feed Lots N N Food Processing N N Light Manufacturing N N Heavy Manufacturing N N Wholesale Sales N N Wholesale Nurseries N N Distribution Center N N Wholesale Storage and Distribution N N Self-service Storage N N Construction Materials Sales N N Junk Yards and Auto Wrecking N N Kennels L(37) N Veterinary Clinics L(14) N Sanitary Landfills,Commercial N N Incinerators,Transfer Stations Gas Wells L(27) SUP L(27) Institutional Land Use Categories NR-2 NR-3 Basic Utilities L(25) L(25) Community Service N N Parks and Open Space P P Churches P P Semi-public, Halls,Clubs,and Lodges SUP SUP Business/Trade School N N Adult or Child Day Care SUP SUP Kindergarten, Elementary School SUP SUP Middle School N N High School N N Colleges N N Hospital N N Elderly Housing N N Medical Centers N N Cemeteries N N Mortuaries N N The chart below illustrates the differences between the NR-2 and NR-3 zoning district development standards. The NR-3 zoning district permits higher density residential. The following limits apply to subdivisions of 2 acres or less: General Regulations NR-2 NR-3 Minimum lot area(square feet) 16,000 10,000 Minimum lot width 80 feet 60 feet Minimum lot depth 100 feet 80 feet Minimum front yard setback 20 feet 15 feet L(2) Minimum side yard 6 feet 6 feet Minimum side yard adjacent to a street 10 feet 10 feet Minimum rear yard 10 feet 10 feet The following limits apply to subdivisions of more than 2 acres in lieu of minimum lot size and dimension requirements: General Regulations NR-2 NR-3 Maximum density,dwelling units per acre 2 3.5 Minimum side yard for non-attached 10 feet 6 feet buildings The following limits apply to all buildings: General Regulations NR-2 NR-3 Maximum lot coverage 30% 50% Minimum landscaped area 70% 50% Maximum building height 40 feet 40 feet 10 feet 10 feet plus 1 plus 1 foot for foot for Minimum yard when abutting a single- each each family use or district foot of foot of building building height height above above 20 feet 20 feet The requested zoning change is consistent with the surrounding land us a and zoning districts. DEPARTMENT AND AGENCY REVIEW.' The Development Review Committee reviewed the rezoning request and no comments were submitted. FINDINGS: The proposed rezoning request includes an Over lay District containing restrictions and conditions that satisfy the concerns of near by property owners. The requested zoning change is consistent with the surrounding land use and zoning districts. Pursuant to subsection 35.3.4.B. a zoning amendment shall be issued only when the following standards are met: 1. The following rezoning conforms to t he Future Land Use element of The Denton Plan. The proposed NR-3 zoning district is consistent with the comprehensive plan designation of Existing Land Use/Infill Compatibility. 2. The proposed rezoning facilitates the adequate provisions of transportati on, water, sewers, schools, parks, other public requirements and public convenience. Provisions exist for the adequate servicing of this proposal relative to water, sewer, schools, parks, and other public infrastructure. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis and findings listed above, staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. EXHIBIT 2 LOCATION MAP Y W Z NORTHRIDGE _ R i MAGNOLIA- - SITE — MIMOSA l z w w J Y HEADL-EE— W (� S Z � -- J m /I r' +I MEADOW RIDGE— Imo, F«ei EXHIBIT 3 EXISTING ZONING MAP N-I U-12 NRMU-1 NORTHRIDGE N R-2 I J N -4 SITE MIMOSA w Y HEADL-EE z 2 Z w w " MU-12 Z J o NR-3 MEADOW- IDG m Feel G 100 20O 400 EXHIBIT 4 PROPOSED ZONING MAP NR U-12 NRMU-1 -NORTHRIDGE SITE N -4 ' MIMOSA ;w :z7Y HEADL-EE ;x N6 ----------------------------------------------- Z W W 14 Z MU-12 -0 -T m NR-3 MEADOWIDGE- pliq Fees C, IU0 20C 400 EXHIBIT 5 FUTURE LAND USE MAP W uW\ x� Neigh orhood enter ,bm Existing Land Use NN ui ON 0 "1 W 10\0 co \00 WONNOWWWWW\ 0 EXHIBIT 6 PUBLIC NOTIFICAITON MAP AGM 500 FOOT BUFFER z WIND R MIRTH ID E— A NOt=IA [S��ITE IM z J W w =E-AbL=EE � m — W Lj c� 0 m M=AD'-W" ID 200 FOOT BUFFER Nz J —BELA EN I p INLET L N O Public Notification Date: 12/29/06 200'Legal Notices* sent via Certified Mail: 23 Feet 500'Certified Notices sent via Regular Mail: 62 o ,sz 5 szs 610 Number of responses to 200'Legal Notice ■ In Opposition: 1 ■ In Favor: 2 ■ Neutral: 1 Percent of land within 200'in opposition: 1.4% EXHIBIT 7 PHOTOGRAPHS Subject site looking south. Subject site looking southwest. Subject site looking southwest. Subject site looking northwest. r Subject site looking southwest. Subject site looking southwest. Alterra House Retirement Home in the background. EXHIBIT 8 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PA IDE MORME s SA0ur Documents\Ordinances107\206-0014.doc EXHIBIT 10 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL 2 (NR-2) TO A NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL 3 (NR-3) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, WITH AN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HINKLE DRIVE AND WINDSOR STREET AND LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY TEXAS, BEING A TRACT OF LAND IN THE N. H. MEISENHEIMER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 810 AND THE ROBERT BEAUMONT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 31 AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO RAYZOR INVESTMENTS LTD., AS TRACT ONE OF SECTION 5, IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 1796, PAGE 601 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Z06-0014) WHEREAS, Rick Baria has applied for a change in zoning for approximately 30 acres from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR- 3)zoning district classification and use designation: and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2007, the PIanning and Zoning Commission concluded a public hearing as required by Iaw, and recommended approval of the requested change in zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change is consistent with the Denton Plan and the Development Code; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The findings and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are incorporated herein by reference and found to be true. SECTION 2. The zoning district classification and use designation for 30 acres of land described in Exhibit "A", as tract of land situated in the city of Denton, Denton County Texas, being a tract of land in the N. H. Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract No. 810 and the Robert Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 31 and being a portion of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments Ltd., as Tract One in Section 5, in deed recorded in Volume 1796, Page 601 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, which is attached and incorporated for all purposes herein (the "Property"), is hereby changed from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district classification and use designation, with an overlay district containing the following restrictions and conditions: a. The woods along the south and cast boundary of the site will be preserved. b. A perimeter fence with a `wrought iron appearance, with taller posts topped by a decorative finial at the corner of each lot will be installed along the perimeter of the site. The setback of the fence will be 50' minimum from the curb. Rows of shrubbery between the fence and sidewalk will be installed to obtain privacy. The developer, and later an H.O.A., will take responsibility for maintenance and irrigation of the approximately 3-acre perimeter landscape area. c. Except for glazing, doors, and trim, the exterior of the homes shall be of vitrified clay brick or stone for all vertical surfaces with a direct load path to the foundation. d. The following restrictions and conditions shall apply to single-family detached homes: o Street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 56 feet. o Parkway width shall be a minimum of 9 feet. o Sidewalk width shall be a minimum of 5 feet. o Front yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet. o Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 6 feet. o Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet, except for Rear Entry Garages. o Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet if garages are accessed through the rear of the property. o Front Entry Garages shall be setback 12 feet from the front most wall of that unit. o Three-car Garages shall not face the street. Notwithstanding the above real property description, the property being rezoned includes all property to the centerline of all adjacent street right-or-way. SECTION 3. The City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification and use designation. SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court, such invalidity shall affect the validity of the provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. SECTION 5. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, a daily newspaper published in the City of Denton, Texas,within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of . 2007. PERRY McNEILL,MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: EDWIN M. SNYDF R, CITY AT Y Exhibit A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED SITUATED in the city of Denton, Denton County Texas, being a tract of land in the N. H. MEISENHEIMER SURVEY, Abstract No. 810 and the ROBERT BEAUMONT SURVEY, Abstract No. 31 and being a portion of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments Ltd., as Tract One in Section 5, in deed recorded in Volume 1796, Page 601 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, and said tract being more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Addition, as shown on plat thereof recorded in Cabinet K, Slide 238, of the Plat Records of Denton County for the southwest corner of a remainder of said Rayzor Investments Tract One in the east line of that certain Tract III conveyed to the City of Denton by deed recorded in Volume 695, Page 669, of said Real Property Records, said point being on a curve whose center bears North 82 degrees, 44 minutes,43 seconds West,2293.00 feet,and from said point a 1/2" iron rod found in place bears North 88 degrees,36 minutes, 20 seconds West,0.30 foot; THENCE northerly with said curve and with said east line of City of Denton Tract III for the west line of said Rayzor tract remainder, passing the northeast corner of said City Tract III and the southeast corner of that certain Tract I conveyed to the City of Denton by said deed recorded in Volume 695, Page 669, and continuing with the east line of said Tract I and said curve, in all a distance of 948.72 feet to a "RPLS 1640" capped 5/8"iron rod set for the northwest corner of said Rayzor tract remainder, in the southeasterly line of that certain tract conveyed to the City of Denton as Tract I by deed recorded in Volume 697, Page 207 of said Real Property Records; THENCE North 46 degrees, 19 minutes, 50 seconds East, with the northerly line of said Rayzor tract remainder and said southeasterly line of City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207, at 16.45 feet passing an "RPLS 1640" capped 5/8" iron rod set for reference, crossing the existing pavement of Windsor Drive, a publicly maintained roadway, continuing in all 104.66 feet; THENCE North 71 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East with the common line of said Rayzor tract remainder and said City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207, again crossing said Windsor Drive pavement,in all 737.20 feet to the west corner of that certain tract conveyed to Rayzor Investments by Correction instrument recorded in Volume 3441, Page 883, of said Real Property Records; THENCE with the northerly and east lines of said Rayzor Investments tract for southerly and west lines of a remainder of said City Tract I recorded in Volume 697, Page 207,the following courses and distances: North 60 degrees, 38 minutes, 10 seconds East, 177.67 feet to the beginning of a curve whose center bears South 29 degrees, 21 minutes,50 seconds East,484.52 feet; easterly with said curve 231.94 feet to an "RPLS 1640" capped 5/8" iron rod set for the end of said curve at the northeast corner of said Rayzor tract described in Volume 3441, Page 883; and, South 0 degrees, 53 minutes,45 seconds West, 24.43 feet to the southeast corner of said Rayzor tract described in Volume 3441, Page 883, in the southerly line of said City Tract I in Volume 697, Page 207; THENCE North 71 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East with said southerly line of City Tract I recorded in Volume 697, Page 207, 15.37 feet to a southeast corner of said City Tract I in the existing pavement of Hinkle Drive,a publicly,-maintained roadway; THENCE North 0 degrees, 53 minutes, 45 seconds East with the east line of said City Tract I in said Hinkle Drive pavement,29.97 feet to the southwest corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to the City of Denton as Tract 1 in deed recorded in Volume 1163, Page 216, of said Real Property Records; THENCE South 89 degrees, 00 minutes, 30 seconds East, 18.82 feet to the southeast corner of said City Tract 1 recorded in Volume 1163, Page 216, in the east line of said Rayzor Investments tract and in the occupied center of said Hinkle Drive; THENCE with the said east line of Rayzor Investments tract and said occupied center of Hinkle Drive, South 1 degree, 17 minutes,30 seconds West, 1282.43 feet,and South 0 degrees, 55 minutes,25 seconds West, 146.72 feet to the southeast corner of said Rayzor Investments tract, from which point a "HS,N" capped 1/2" iron rod bears North 88 degrees,36 minutes,20 seconds West,32.77 feet; THENCE North 88 degrees, 36 minutes, 20 seconds West with the south line of said Raynor Investments tract remainder, at 30 feet passing the northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Addition and continuing with the north line of said Lot 1, 1078.45 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 30,7036 acres (1,337,448 square feet), of which 0.5298 acre (23,080 square feet) lies within the probable limits of Windsor Drive (based on Windsor Drive being an 80 foot wide right-of-way and the existing pavement being the eastbound (south) lanes of a divided roadway, and 0.9759 acre (42,510 square feet) lies within Hinkle Drive (based on one-half of a 60 foot wide right-of-way), leaving a net area of 29.1978 acres (1,271,858 square feet). THIS DESCRIPTION PREPARED TO ACCOMPANY A_SURVEY MAP OF THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY meis779ja Council Meeting Revision Date Requests for Information 12/14/2018 Request Request Date Staff Responsible Status Requested By Develop a strategic plan for homeless shelters in Denton (current environment,capacity,need,emergency 1 circumstances,best practices,family shelter options). 7/17/2018 Kuechler A work session is planned for December 18. Armintor/Briggs/Meltzer Update on marketing/advertising policy and naming 2 opportunities at City facilities. 8/2/2018 Langley/Packan A work session is planned for February 26. Hudspeth Information on providing additional options for 3 broadband service aside from current service providers. 9/25/2018 Birdseye/Collister ISR will be provided in the December 21 Friday report. Briggs Information and recommendations on Denton's Smart 4 City initiatives. 10/9/2018 Kraft/Wood ISR will be provided in the December 21 Friday report. Briggs/Meltzer Information was included in the November 21 staff report.A Strategy for addressing telecommunications and utility detailed ISR will be provided in a future Friday report.A 5 lines along Dallas Drive including pricing and timing. 10/16/2018 Canizares/Morrow/Estes work session is scheduled for February 5. Briggs Review of the City's agreement with the Denton Housing 6 Authority. 10/16/2018 Kuechler/Reinwand/Leal Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Briggs Information on if the tree mitigation fund is used to fund 7 employee salaries. 11/13/2018 Packan/Cannone ISR is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Briggs A status update was provided in the November 30 Friday Provide information on how quickly staff can proceed report.Staff will provide updates later in December once a 8 with installing windows at City Hall West. 11/13/2018 Canizares/Hartley project timeline has been established. Hudspeth Information on staffs ability use utility information to notify residents within 200'and 500'of a proposed Information will be provided in the December 21 Friday 9 development in addition to using DCAD data. 11/13/2018 McDonald/Leal report. Ryan Provide information on safety concerns with the Wells Fargo Parking Garage and confirm if there are similar 10 concerns with the proposed garage at Park 7. 11/13/2018 McDonald/Cannone Information is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Briggs Information on alternative strategies to promote high-tech 11 entrepreneurship. 11/13/2018 Booth Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Meltzer Staff report on establishing a sobering center in Denton similar to the ones recently opened in San Antonio, Information will be provided in the December 21 Friday 12 Houston,and Austin. 11/13/2018 Dixon/Kuechler/Wood report. Armintor Staff report on the potential establishment of a citizens' Information will be provided in the December 21 Friday 13 tenant committee to advocate for renter rights. 11/13/2018 Lahart/McDonald/Leal report. Armintor Information on a potential program to incentivize residents to use doorbell monitoring technology to assist 14 with public safety. 11/13/2018 Dixon/Padgett/Birdseye Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Hudspeth Council Meeting Revision Date Requests for Information 12/14/2018 Request Request Date Staff Responsible Status Requested By Information on the potential creation of a small business 15 or corridor reinvestment grant program. 11/27/2018 Booth Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Briggs Information on programs conducted by other municipalities to help persons experiencing homelessness 16 obtain photo IDs. 11/27/2018 Kuechler Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Armintor Staff report on the recent resolution passed by the City of Information will be provided in the December 21 Friday 17 Dallas to establish itself as a Welcoming City. 11/27/2018 Birdseye report. Armintor 18 Provide an update on the street failure issue. 11/27/2018 Estes Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Meltzer ISR on regional transit efforts that are being coordinated 19 by NCTCOG. 11/27/2018 Canizares Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Hudspeth Staff report on what it would take to design study requirements tailored specifically for Denton's geology to 12/3/2018 20 help establish a sound policy rationale. &12/4/2018 Banks ISR is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Meltzer Staff report on the feasibility of adopting and enforcing gas well notification disclosure requirements for new occupants of dwellings located within 1,000 feet of a gas 21 well pad site. 12/4/2018 McDonald/Banks Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Meltzer Information on funding and coordination of community banners,such as the one displayed by the Community 22 Market. 12/4/2018 Birdseye/Barnett Information is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Briggs Staff report on having a separate Townhome/Condominium designation in the Denton 23 Development Code. 12/4/2018 MCDonald/Cannone Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Armintor Staff report on on-street parking that was turned over to UNT,including a feasibility analysis of allowing 24 residents to use that parking. 12/4/2018 Deshmukh/Estes Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Hudspeth Create a unique identifier/number for each slide for Information will be provided in the December 14 Friday 25 easier reference. 12/4/2018 Wood report. Hudspeth Information on installing a natural/planted trash can 26 screen at the MLK Recreation Center. 12/4/2018 Packan/Cox Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Hudspeth Information on the total number of trucks coming through Denton,a map of the general geography of Denton's new industrial corridor indicating City vs.State roads,and quantify the infrastructure impact caused by 27 major industrial developments. 12/11/2018 Estes/Kremer Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Armintor/Briggs/Watts 28 Provide an update on options for a sign for City Hall. 12/11/2018 Canizares Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Briggs Provide a status update on the identification of projects 29 for the Opportunity Zone. 12/11/2018 Booth Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Briggs 30 Information on why Sunday bus service is not offered 12/11/2018 Canizares Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Hudspeth Council Meeting Revision Date Requests for Information 12/14/2018 Request Request Date Staff Responsible Status Requested By Information on illegal parking enforcement options for vehicles displaying a disabled parking placard or license 31 plate. 12/11/2018 Dixon Information is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Hudspeth Information on the best way for pedestrians to safely 32 cross University Drive to access TWU's soccer fields. 12/11/2018 Deshmukh/Estes Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Hudspeth Other Council Information Requests 12/14/2018 Request Request Date Staff Responsible Status Requested By Request Source 1 Staff Report on commercial food diversion programs. 6/4/2018 Cox Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Briggs Committee on the Environment Information on the potential benefits of air quality Information will be shared with the Committee on the 2 monitors in Denton. 9/17/2018 Barnett Environment during their January meeting. Meltzer Committee on the Environment Information on consultant recommendations for recycling 3 and bulk items. 11/5/2018 Cox Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Meltzer Committee on the Environment Staff report on rental property inspections including practices to address faulty roofs and mold and information on how other cities ensure compliance with Information will be provided in the December 21 Friday 4 the Tenant Bill of Rights. 11/6/2018 Lahart/McDonald report. Armintor Email from CM Armintor Coordinate with TxDOT on Teasley and Pennsylvania to Information was provided in the November 16 and reduce speed on portion of Teasley and put a traffic light November 30 Friday report. Staff will provide updates once 5 at the intersection. 11/12/2018 Deshmukh/Estes a signal warrant analysis is conducted by TxDOT. Armintor Email from CM Armintor Develop a comprehensive housing inventory of transitional and permanent supportive housing units in Staff is working on this project and will provide updates as 6 the city and perform a needs assessment. 11/13/2018 Kuechler it progresses. Armintor Email from CM Armintor Analysis of major projects that were approved under the current Denton Development Code (DDC)that would not be acceptable under the proposed DDC and major projects that were denied under the current DDC that Information will be provided in the December 21 Friday 7 would be permissible under the proposed DDC. 11/13/2018 McDonald report. Meltzer Email from CM Meltzer Provide the date for each landfill permit-related expense ISR is provided in the December 14 Friday report. highlighted in Table 1 of ISR 2018-155 (Landfill Additional information will be covered in the January 8 8 Expansion Permitting Process from Oct. 26) 11/26/2018 Cox Landfill Expansion Permitting Process work session. Armintor Email from CM Armintor Information on the ability to adjust prices on waste 9 coming to our landfill from other municipalities. 11/28/2018 Cox Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Meltzer Email from CM Meltzer Information on introducing a curbside organics/composting collection program, including to 10 what extent a market can be found for the product. 11/28/2018 Cox Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Meltzer Email from CM Meltzer Information on the feasibility and requirements to make multi-family recycling universal, including the needed 11 education and outreach to minimize contamination risk. 11/28/2018 Cox Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Meltzer Email from CM Meltzer A status update is provided in the December 7 Friday Information on Zoning concern for a proposed batch report. Staff will provide updates once additional 12 plant off of Roselawn Drive. 11/29/2018 Cannone/McDonald information is received from TxDOT. Briggs Email from CM Briggs Information on the addition of stop signs at Cabrillo and Sea Cove and Cabrillo and Wharfside in the Villages of 13 Carmel subdivision 12/2/2018 Deshmukh/Estes Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Armintor Email from CM Armintor Other Council Information Requests 12/14/2018 Request Request Date Staff Responsible Status Requested By Request Source Information on alternatives to calling the Police non- 14 emergency line to notify Police of non-emergency issues. 12/3/2018 Dixon Information is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Hudspeth Email from CM Hudspeth 15 Provide recent Crash data for W. Oak Street. 12/3/2018 Deshmukh/Dixon Information is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Meltzer Email from CM Meltzer Information will be provided in a future Friday and/or 16 Update on the Verizon pole attachment debt. 12/3/2018 Puente/Morrow Legal Status report. Meltzer Email from CM Meltzer Information on the practices used by other municipalities to permit horse riding and horse-drawn carriages and address associated sanitation concerns within the City 17 limits. 12/3/2018 Birdseye ISR is provided in the December 14 Friday report. Ryan Email from Mayor Pro Tem Ryan Information on what can be done to address dumpsters blocking sidewalks, of particular concern is a property 18 located at 1000 Gregg Street. 12/4/2018 Cox/McDonald/Birdseye Information will be provided in a future Friday report. Briggs Email from CM Briggs Update on all sidewalk projects that received Safe Routes Information was provided in the December 7 Friday report. to School funding, including Stuart to Ginnings and the Staff will provide additional information on project timing 19 area surrounding Woodrow Elementary. 12/5/2018 Deshmukh/Estes/Oliphant following feedback from TxDOT. Briggs Email from CM Briggs Staff report on the development history,proposed use, age restrictions, and traffic impact of the Fireside Park 20 residential development 12/13/2018 McDonald/Wyatt ISR will be provided in the December 21 Friday report. Briggs/Meltzer Emails from CM Meltzer and CM Briggs Information on the plans for the 7 acres between Information will be provided in the December 21 Friday 21 Southridge Estates and the Goodwill shopping center. 12/13/2018 Menguita/Cannone report. Armintor Email from CM Armintor Information on planned intersection enhancements at 77 22 and 1-35. 12/14/2018 Deshmukh/Estes Information will be provided in a future Friday Report. Briggs Email from CM Briggs and email from Mayor Watts wmm::�I December 2018 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday 'Iliursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11:30 am Council 10:30am Committee on 4 p.m. Public Art Luncheon Citizen Engagement 5:00pm Board of Committee 11:00 Development 1:30pm Committee on Ethics Code Review the Environment 2:00 pm CC Work 6pm Park Board Session 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 9:00am Public Utilities 11:00am Mobility 11:00am EDP Board- Board Committee-cancelled cancelled 5:30pm Traffic Safety 11:00 Development 5:30pm HLC 5:00pm P&ZWork Commission Code Review 1:00 pm 2nd Tuesday Session Session 6:30pm P&ZRegular Se ssio n 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 cancelled 4:00pm ZRA 12:00pm CC Work HaBSCo Meeting Session 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 23 24 25 26 27 29 29 Christmas Eve - No Council Meeting City Ho lid a y C h ris tm as Day - City Holiday 30 31 12/14/2018 11:33 AM January 2019 1 2 3 4 5 No C o un c it Me a tin g 4:OOpm Public At Coru nittee 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11:30 am Council �1:00am Mobility 11:00amEDP Luncheon Committee 1:30pm Committee on the 2:00pm CC Work Session 5:OOpmP&Z Work Session Environment 6:30 pm CC Regular 6:30pm P&Z Regular Sess ion Session 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 9:00am Public Utilities 2:00pm CC Work Session 4:00pmHaBSCoMV eting Board 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 5:3Opm HLC 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 No Council Meeting 11:OOamTIF Board(fIRZ#1) 5:00pm P&Z Work Session 6:30pm P&ZRegular Session 27 28 29 30 31 6:00pm Public Utilities No Council Meeting Bo a rd 4:OOpm ZBA Future Work Session Items 12/14/2018 Meeting Date Currently Slated Work Session Items Notes 18-Dec IOOF Cemetery North Lakes Dog Affordable housing Strategic Plan for Fence 1pm Start Time Park incentives Homeless Shelters Improvements 7-Jan Lunch gam start time for Municipal Judge Block for Municipal Library Annual Citywide Strategic Interviews Judge interviews Report Plan Update DME Risk SRO/Collegiate Landfill Expansion 8-Jan Management Policy Floodplain CRS Housing Permitting Process Cole/Hunter Construction Code Special Event Recycling Business 15-Jan Development Review Ordinance Update Case Analysis City Hall East Facility Develoment Service American Legion Location will be City 4-Feb Lunch Animal Shelter* Plan for PD Fees Hall Cultural District Hall East/Police HQ Cole/Hunter Solid Waste Mid- Housing Tax Credit Dallas/Teasley 1001 Mayhill Facility Development Follow- 5-Feb Year Budget Review Applications Telecom Poles Improvements Up Right-of-Way Downtown Design Denton 12-Feb Ordinance Standards Development Code Update on Work Session E-Cigarette Marketing/Naming 26-Feb Strategy Session Airport Governance Enforcement Policy Bell Avenue Employee Ethics Council Appointee 4-Mar Lunch Fire Diversity Policy Review Process Purchasing Manual DEC Noise Bonnie Brae and 5-Mar Update Mitigation Scripture Tract Mews Streets New Market Tax 19-Mar Credits Patrick Park Tennis Center Home Chemical Credit and Collection Business 26-Mar Collections Study Case Analysis Enhanced Leachate Recirculation Yard Waste South Lakes Park Business Case Collection Business Solid Waste Rate Date TBD Parking Lot Analysis Case Analysis Discussion Scheduled from 10/23 Work Session Top 5 from 11/27 Work Session *Will include overview of Fel-V and FIV testing Construction Projects Report 190VING .. CITY Week of December 17-23,2018 (1f' DENTONFor general inquiries and questions,please contact the Project Management Office at(940)349-7227 Proposed Date Proposed Date Other Department Updated Information/ Street/Intersection From To of Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Notes CURRENT PROJECTS See Yellow Highlighted for Ma'or Closures LINT 2018 Residence Hall Project Coordinate with Ave.A Maple Eagle 3/19/18 2/28/19 (Both SB Lanes Closed) Engineering N/A LINT (940)349 8910 Ave.C Hickory Mulberry 9/24/18 1/2/19 LINT Monument Wall Public Works LINTProject (940)349-8905 (Road Closure) Inspections Water Improvements Bowling Green St. Georgetown Auburn 11/29/18 1/22/18 (Daily Street Closure will re-open end Water 11/7/18 (940)349-7167 Expedited Completion from 2/25/19 of each day) Bonnie Brae St. Roselawn North of 7/1/2017 7/1/2019 (phase 1)Street Widening Engineering 6/14/18 (940)349-8910 Vintage Londonderry Street Improvements Camden Ct. Londonderry Dead End 10/1/18 1/18/19 Phase II of III Streets 9/24/18 (940)349-7160 (Street Closure) Transmission Distribution Collins St. Eagle Locust 11/26/18 12/21/18 Improvements DME N/A (940)349-8700 Street Closure Dallas Dr. Intersection of Teasley 11/12/18 2/22/19 Turn Lane Upgrade Streets 11/5/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closure) Eagle Dr. Elm Carroll 12/3/18 5/31/19 Drainage and Water Improvements Engineering (940)349-8910 (Street Closure) Box Culvert Installation Part of Eagle Elm St. Eagle Maple 10/22/18 1/31/19 Engineering 10/11/18 Communications,visited (940)349-8910 (Temporary Lane Closures) businesses on 10/11 City of FM 2181 Denton/Corinth Lillian Miller 7/11/17 2/1/20 Street Widening TxDOT TxDOT (940)-387-1414 City limits Fulton St. Oak Broadway 6/7/18 12/21/18 Water Main Construction Water 6/5/18 (940)349-7167 Extended Completion from (Street Closure) 12/14/18 Proposed Date Proposed Date Other Department Updated Information/ Street/Intersection From To of Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Notes Hickory St. Ave C Ave B 9/24/18 1/15/19 Phase III Street Reconstruction Streets 9/12/18 (940)349-7160 Extended Completion from (Street Closure) 1/2/19 John Paine Rd. Athens Gilmer 12/17/18 1/4/19 Street Panel Repair Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Temporary Lane Closure) Wastewater Improvements Nextdoor Kendoph Ln. Underwood Willowwood 11/26/18 2/7/19 (Daily Street Closure will re-open end Wastewater N/A Notification, (940)349-7300 of each day) Door Hanger Kings Row Yellowstone Sherman 12/17/18 4/26/19 Street Reconstruction Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Temporary Lane Closure) Londonderry Street Improvements Kingswood Ct. Londonderry Dead End 10/1/18 1/18/19 Phase II of III Streets 9/24/18 (940)349-7160 Street Closure Laguna Dr. Yellowstone Sherman 12/17/18 4/26/19 Street Reconstruction Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Temporary Lane Closure) Londonderry Street Improvements Londonderry Ln. Teasley Hollyhill 11/12/18 1/18/19 Phase III of III Streets 9/25/18 (940)349-7160 (Street Closure) Manhattan Dr. Yellowstone Sherman 11/26/18 3/29/19 Street Reconstruction Streets 11/14/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closure) Mayhill Rd. Intersection of Gayla 11/26/18 1/11/19 Part of Mayhill Street Widening Engineering (940)349-8910 (Road Closure with Detour) Mayhill Rd. US 380 Edwards 9/1/17 2/1/20 Street Widening Engineering 1/3/18, 1/24/18 Door Hangers (940)349-8910 (Temporary Lane Closures) McKinney St. Woodrow Jannie 12/10/18 1/11/19 Utility Improvements Engineering (940)349-8910 (Temporary Outside Lane Closure) Mistywood Ln. Woodhaven Jamestown 11/7/18 1/3/19 Wastewater Main ReconstructionWastewater 8/23/18 (940)349-7300 (Temporary Lane Closures) Myrtle St. Eagle Maple 9 4 18 5 31 19 Eagle Drainage Improvements Engineering 8 21 18 Contacted DCTA (940)349-8910 (Street Closure) Oak St. Fulton Mounts 12/17/18 12/21/18 Water Improvements Water (940)349-8910 Delayed Start from 12/10/18 (Street Closure) Paisley St. Frame Ruddell 10/15/18 1/25/19 Street Reconstruction Streets 10/3/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closures) Prominence Pkw Mayhill Atlanta 1 31 18 12 28 18 Water and Wastewater Crossing Engineering 1 24 18 Door Hangers 940 349-8910 y y / / / / (Road Closure) g g / / g ( ) Proposed Date Proposed Date Other Department Updated Information/ Street/Intersection From To of Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Notes Rine Rd. N.Elm Solana 9 29 17 1 31 19 Road Removal and Replacement Engineering Yes Electronic Signs Extended Completion from y / / / / g g g (940)349-8910 (Road Closure) 12/28/18 Rockwood Ln. Royal Mistywood 11/26/18 12/21/18 Rockwood Drainage Improvements Drainage 11/23/18 Door Hangers (940)349-8488 (Intermitten Street Closure) Royal Ln. Royal Rockwood 11/26/18 12/21/18 Rockwood Drainage ImprovementsDrainage 11/23/18 (940)349-8488 (Intermitten Street Closure) Rambling Street Panel Replacement/Sidewalk Seven Oaks Ln. Brook Glen Falls 12/7/18 12/21/18 Repair Streets 11/7/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closures) Shady Oaks Dr. Teasley Woodrow 12/3/18 12/28/18 Base Repairs Streets Electronic Signs Meet with business (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closure) owners Sierra Dr. Yellowstone Sherman 11/26/18 3/29/19 Street Reconstruction Streets 11/14/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closure) Mayhill Road Widening Contacted Spencer Rd. Mayhill Bridges 4/2/18 1/11/19 (Road Closure) Engineering 3/16/2018,9/14 departments (940)349-8910 affected Street Widening US 377(Ft.Worth Dr.) IH 35E 0.26 mi south of 12/3/18 TBD (Temporary Lane Closures during non- TxDOT 9/25/18 Public Meeting FM 1830 10/8 (940)387-1414 peak traffic) Walnut St. Locust Austin 10/29/18 12/30/18 Atmos Service Connection Engineering N/A (940)349-8914 (Street Closure) COMPLETED PROJECTS Fairway Dr. Ft.Worth Club View 11/12/18 11/21/18 Street Panel Repair Streets 11/5/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closure) Jim Christal Rd. Western Blvd Scripture 7/3/18 11/26/18 Utility Line Construction Water/WW N/A Contacted (940)349-8463 (Road Closure) Businesses affected Dead End Street Reconstruction Nextdoor Kendoph Ln. Willowwood 11/26/18 12/3/18 Streets N/A Notification, (940)349-7160 South (Street Closure) Door Haneer Lakeview Blvd. Draught Horse 801 Lakeview 11/26/18 12/21/18 Street Panel Repair Streets 11/14/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closure) Proposed Date Proposed Date Other Department Updated Information/ Street/Intersection From To of Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Notes Londonderry Ln. Westminster Hollyhill 11/5/18 12/13/18 Water/Wastewater Improvements Water 9/25/18 (940)349-7167 (Street Closure) Parking Garage Construction Building Mulberry St. Bell Industrial 10/15/18 12/14/18 Contractor N/A Outside Contractor (940)349-8360 New Completion (Street Closure) Inspections Oak St. North Texas Thomas 12/3/18 12/14/18 Sidewalk Improvements Engineering (940)349-8910 New Completion (Temporary Outside Lane Closure) Palmer Dr. Sherman Peach 11/12/18 11/16/18 Street Resurfacing Streets 11/5/18 (940)349-7160 (Road Closure) Pinehurst Ct. Wintercreek Cul d Sidewalk Repaire Sac 11/12/18 12/14/18 Streets 11/5/18 (940)349-7160 New Completion (Temporary Lane Closures) Swan Park Dr. Glen Falls Seven Oaks 11/14/18 12/21/18 Sidewalk Repair/Panel Replacement Streets 11/7/18 (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closures) UPCOMING PROJECTS Athens Dr. Tawakoni Eagle Mountain 1/2/19 1/25/19 Street Panel Repair Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Temporary Lane Closure) Atlas Dr. Redstone Hercules 1/4/19 3/4/19 Wastewater Main ReconstructionWastewater (940)349-7300 (Temporary Lane Closures) Bernard St. Fannin W Chestnut 1/4/19 4/5/19 Street Reconstruction Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Street Closure) Bonnie Brae St. Roselawn 135E 1/15/19 1/15/20 North South Water Main Phase 2Water (940)349-8910 (Temporary Lane Closures) Bowling Green St. Auburn Georgetown 1/14/19 3/29/19 Street Reconstruction Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Street Closure) Castle Ln. Wilsonwood Southern dead 1/3/19 2/22/19 Street Reconstruction Streets (940)349-7160 New Project end (Street Closure) Proposed Date Proposed Date Other Department Updated Information/ Street/Intersection From To of Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Notes Eagle Mountain Dr. Athens Gilmer 1/2/19 1/25/19 Street Panel Repair Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Temporary Lane Closure) Wastewater Main Reconstruction Fulton St. Congress Gregg 2/8/19 3/23/19 Pase I of II Wastewater (940)349-7300 (Temporary Lane Closures) Hickory Creek Rd. Teasley Riverpass 1/1/19 6/1/20 Street Widening Engineering (940)349-8910 (Temporary Lane Closures) Phase I-Storm Water Improvements Hinkle Dr. University Windsor 1/1/19 1/1/20 (Magnolia Drainage Ph 11 Engineering 11/13/18 (940)349-8910 Temporary Lane Closures) Water Improvements Kerley Duncan Shady Oaks 1/25/19 4/4/19 (Daily Street Closure will re-open end Water (940)349-8910 New Project of each day) Mistywood Ln. Rockwood Jamestown 1/3/19 3/5/19 Rockwood Drainage ImprovementsDrainage (940)349-8488 (Intermitten Street Closure) Curb and Gutter Panhandle St. Carroll Bolivar TBD TBD Street Resurfacing, Streets 4/9/18 Door Hangers (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closures) PEC 4-Engineering In Design Installing Underground Box Culvert Engineering 11/13/18 (940)349-8910 Drainage and Roadway Construction Roselawn Dr. Bonnie Brae Kansas City Southern RR TBD TBD (Bonnie Brae Phase 1 Engineering N/A (940)349-8910 One Lane traffic control) Atmos Utility Relocations Scripture St. Thomas Ector 1/2/19 1/31/19 (Westbound Lane Closure,Intersection Atmos (940)205-9821 New Project at Hillcrest Closed) Atmos Utility Relocations Scripture St. Ector Gober 2/4/19 2/28/19 (Westbound Lane Closure,Intersection Atmos (940)205-9821 New Project at Bradley Closed) Scripture St. Gober Normal 3/4/19 3/29/19 Atmos Utility Relocations Atmos (940)205-9821 New Project (Westbound Lane Closure) Proposed Date Proposed Date Other Department Updated Information/ Street/Intersection From To of Construction of Completion Brief Description of Construction Department Letters Communication Contact: Notes Spring Side Rd. Underwood Westcourt 1/2/19 1/25/19 Street Panel Repair Streets (940)349-7160 New Project (Temporary Lane Closure) Stuart Rd. Windsor Kings Row TBD TBD Concrete Curb and Gutter Repair Streets (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closures) Thomas St. Panhandle Oak 2/1/19 TBD Streets Construction Streets (940)349-7160 Vintage Blvd. US 377 135W 3/1/2019 2021 Street Widening Engineering (940)349-8910 (Bonnie Brae Phase 2) Yellowstone Kings Row Monterey 2/1/2019 Street Reconstruction Streets (940)349-7160 (Temporary Lane Closure)