The URL can be used to link to this page

060724 Friday Staff ReportCity Manager’s Office 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201  (940) 349-8307 OUR CORE VALUES Inclusion  Collaboration  Quality Service  Strategic Focus  Fiscal Responsibility MEMORANDUM DATE: June 7, 2024 TO: The Honorable Mayor Hudspeth and Council Members FROM: Sara Hensley, City Manager SUBJECT: Friday Staff Report Upcoming Meetings A.Public Utilities Board on Monday, Jun. 10, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. in the City Council WorkSession Room. B.Historic Landmark Commission on Monday, Jun. 10, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at theDevelopment Service Center. C.Cancelled - Library Board on Monday, Jun. 10, 2024, at 5:30 p.m. at the North Branch Library. D.Committee on the Environment on Tuesday, Jun. 11, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. in the CityCouncil Work Session Room. E.Economic Development Partnership Board on Wednesday, Jun. 12, 2024, at 11:00 a.m.at the Development Service Center. F.Airport Advisory Board on Wednesday, Jun. 12, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. in the AirportTerminal Meeting Room. G.Planning and Zoning Commission on Wednesday, Jun. 12, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. in the CityCouncil Work Session Room and Council Chambers. H.Health and Building Standards Commission on Thursday, Jun. 13, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. at the Development Service Center. I.Cancelled - Community Services Advisory Committee on Friday, Jun. 14, 2024, at 12:00p.m. at the Development Service Center. Please check the City of Denton website for final meeting days and times as information is subject to change after the Friday Report is published. Public Meetings & Agendas | Denton, TX (civicplus.com) General Information & Status Updates A.Solid Waste and Recycling Schedule Change for Yard Waste and Brush Collection – FromJun. 10 until Sep. 30, yard waste and brush collection services will begin one hour earlier,at 6 a.m., to help protect staff members from the heat. Residents should leave their bins onthe curb if their debris is not collected on the regular service day. Bins will be picked upby the end of the week. Staff contact: Adrian Hill, Solid Waste and Recycling B.Fitch and S&P Global Bond Credit Rating – The City recently received the bond reaffirmedcredit ratings for the upcoming General Obligation (GO) and Certificates of Obligation(CO) bond sales this month. On Jun. 4, City Council adopted bond ordinances authorizing the bond sales to improve water, wastewater, and electric utility infrastructure and refund debt. Fitch and S&P assigned a rating of ‘AA+’ to the city's summer bond sales, the second-highest rating offered by both Fitch and S&P. The attached Fitch and S&P Rating and Bond Rating Charts include both agency’s rating reports and bond rating charts. Staff contact: Randee Klingele, Finance. C.CoServ Recognizes Denton Municipal Electric (DME) for Mutual Aid – On Jun. 6, DMEwas recognized by CoServ, an electric cooperative and gas distribution company that serves the wider Denton County area, for assistance provided during the recent tornado response. CoServ estimated that with the help of DME staff, nearly 90 poles, 60transformers, and over 180,000 feet of wire were replaced in just a few days – a task thatwould have otherwise taken weeks. Staff contact: Tony Puente, DME D.Master Plan Public Workshop – On Jun. 26, the Denton Enterprise Airport will host an Airport Master Plan Public Information Workshop. Airport stakeholders and Dentonresidents are invited to hear from the planning consultants, ask questions, and learn moreabout this vital process and what it means for the airport's future. Additionally, a websitehas been launched to keep the community up to date on the status of the Master Plan and to provide access to draft documents for public review. The website can be accessed at https://dto.airportstudy.net/. The workshop will start at 5 p.m. at the Airport TerminalBuilding (5000 Airport Road). Staff contact: Ryan Adams, Airport E.IOOF Cemetery Paving – Parks Maintenance staff will pave a portion of the entryway and far western driveway of IOOF Cemetery off W. Highland Street. The project is expectedto begin Wednesday, Jun. 12, and conclude on Friday, Jun. 14. Staff contact: MarshallMcGee, Parks and Recreation F.Mosquito Season Update –West Nile Virus (WNV) mosquito season has begun, and monitoring began on May 27. The Mosquito Surveillance Response Plan (MSRP), https://www.cityofdenton.com/DocumentCenter/View/5531/Mosquito-Surveillance-Response-Plan-PDF, provides general information about WNV and outlines the steps to betaken if progressively greater human health risks from WNV are met. 2 The City is working with the University of North Texas for sample collection, and mosquito samples will be tested by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) for WNV and other mosquito-borne viruses. The City’s webpage, https://www.cityofdenton.com/471/Mosquito-Safety, contains the MSRP along with general information and monitoring data presented on Denton County’s mosquito interactive maphttps://apps.geocortex.com/webviewer/?app=6d1bdf017d764e2da1b5248eb019bb8d. Monitoring will be performed approximately weekly until late fall. Staff Contact: Deborah Viera, Environmental Services & Sustainability Responses to Council Member Requests for Information A.Pothole on Hobson Lane – On May 30, Council Member Holland shared informationregarding a pothole on Hobson Lane. Staff filled the pothole with a temporary cold asphaltmix and added it to the maintenance schedule for a permanent solution. Staff encourageresidents to report potholes and related issues using the Engage Denton application. Staffcontact: Ethan Cox, Streets B.Water Conservation and Smart Irrigation Systems – On May 31, Council Member Beckshared a question from a resident regarding concerns about smart irrigation systems andthe City’s new water conservation plan causing overwatering. Although the waterconservation plan may limit the full capabilities of some smart watering systems, most can accommodate watering on specific days. The restrictions in the conservation plan arenecessary to ensure that the City’s water resources are properly managed for the future.Staff contact: Haley Salazar, Water C.Classification of Windsor Road Extension – On Jun. 4, Council Member Beck provided a request from a resident on clarity regarding project update notification. The Windsor RoadExtension was incorrectly entered as a Secondary Arterial. Staff updated the projectplanning software to the accurate classification of Major Collector. Updates automaticallynotify residents enrolled in project modifications. Staff communicated with residents toexplain the mislabeling and correct classification. Staff contact: Julie Wyatt, Development Services Intergovernmental News State – On May 10, the City published a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to solicit the services of a state legislative consultant ahead of the 89th Legislative Session. The initial deadline to respond to the request was May 29, but it has been extended to Jun. 19 to allow for a larger applicant pool. The state legislative consultant will assist the City in advocating on behalf of Denton year-round, especially during the upcoming 89th Legislative Session that begins in the State Capitol in Jan. 2025. Staff contact: Kristi Fogle, City Manager’s Office Upcoming Community Events and Public Meetings Please visit the City of Denton website for upcoming community events and details. 3 Attachments A.Fitch and S&P Bond Credit Rating .......................................................................................5 Informal Staff Reports A.ISR 2024-19 Landfill Wait Times ......................................................................................33 B.ISR 2024-20 Update on Airport Financial Analysis ............................................................35 C.ISR 2024-21 Denton Central Appraisal District Proposed Budget ....................................59 Information A.Council Requests for Information ......................................................................................85 B.Public Meetings Calendar ..................................................................................................87 C.Future Work Session Items ................................................................................................90 D.Street Closure Report .........................................................................................................91 4 New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 1 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Denton (TX) [General Government] This is a text exhibit 'USPF Locals - NLG Analytical Conclusion Text'. See instructions in side pane. The 'AA+' IDR reflects the city's financial resilience assessment of 'aaa' based on high levels of revenue and expenditure control and an ample level of budgetary flexibility, with fiscal 2023 unrestricted general fund reserves of $44.6 million, or 26.7% of spending, well above the minimum 7.5% of spending requirement for the assessment. The IDR also incorporates mixed demographic and economic trend and level metrics, with population growth considered 'strongest', at 89th percentile of the Fitch local government rating portfolio. Denton's unemployment, educational attainment and median household income levels on a composite basis are considered 'midrange' by Fitch. Ratings Long-Term IDR AA+ Outlooks Long-Term IDR Stable New Issues Sale Date Wednesday, 12 June 2024 Outstanding Debt Applicable Criteria U.S. Public Finance Local Government Rating Criteria (April 2024) Related Research Fitch Affirms Denton, TX's IDR at 'AA+'; Outlook Stable (May 2024) Analysts Emmanuelle Lawrence +1 512 2153740 emmanuelle.lawrence@fitchratings.com Omid Rahmani +1 512 215 3734 omid.rahmani@fitchratings.com 5 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 2 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Rating Sensitivities Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade --A decline in available general fund reserve levels sustained below 7.5% of spending, which would lower Fitch's assessment of financial resilience to 'aa'; --Diminished population growth trends or deterioration in the city's economic level metrics to below the 'midrange' assessment; --A sustained approximate 40%-50% increase in long-term liabilities and carrying costs absent a commensurate increase in personal income or governmental resources. Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade --A sustained approximate 35% decreasein long-term liabilities and carrying costs absent a commensurate decrease in personal income or governmental resources. Security The GOs and COs are direct obligations of the city, payable from an ad valorem tax levied on all taxable property withinthe city, limited to $2.50 per $100 of taxable assessed valuation (TAV). The COs are further backed by a limited pledge of surplus net revenues (not to exceed $1,000) from the city's utility system. Rating Headroom & Positioning Denton Model Implied Rating: 9.37 ('AA+')• Metric Profile: 9.37 ('AA+') • Net Additional Analytical Factor Notching: 0.0 Denton's Model Implied Rating of 9.37 is in the middle of the 9.0 to 10.0 range for its current 'AA+' rating. The financial resilience metric of 'aaa' reflects the city's history of strong reserve levels, ample budgetary flexibility and high levels of revenue and expenditure control. Population growth has been strong while demographic and economic level metrics have been mixed, with educational attainment levels comfortably above the median of the Fitch local government rating portfolio (74th percentile) and median household income levels within the 37th percentile. The ratings are most sensitive to changes in the city's long-term liability burden, including carrying costs and improvement in the resource base. A strong university presence contributes to the somewhat depressed income levels. The long-term liability burden is weak (30th percentile) when compared to Fitch's local government rating portfolio. The Local Government Rating Model (LGRM) generates Model Implied Ratings (MIR) which communicate the issuer's credit quality relative to Fitch's local government rating portfolio (the MIR will be the IDR except in certain circumstances explained in the applicable criteria). The MIR is expressed via a numerical value calibrated to Fitch's long-term rating scale that ranges from 10.0 or higher ('AAA'), 9.0 ('AA+'), 8.0 ('AA'), and so forth down to 1.0 ('BBB-' and below). Model Implied Ratings reflect the combination of issuer-specific metrics and assessments to generate a Metric Profile (MP), and a structured framework to account for Additional Analytical Factors (AAFs) not captured in the Metric Profile that can either mitigate or exacerbate credit risks. AAFs are reflected in notching from the MP and are capped at +/-3 notches. Current Developments Denton closed fiscal 2023 (ending Sept. 30 FYE) with a net general fund operating deficit of $859,000, net of transfers. The city maintained a healthy unrestricted general fund balance at $44.6 million, which is equal to 27.6% of general fund spending. The unrestricted general fund balance has equaled no less than 26% of spending dating back at least a decade. 6 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 3 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Existing unrestricted reserve levels comfortably support the 'aaa' financial resilience assessment. The city's formal reserve policy includes a minimum reserve level at 20% of spending plus a 5% resiliency reserve (25% combined total). The adopted fiscal 2024 budget reflects structurally balanced operations. Profile Denton is located within the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area at the convergence of Interstates 35 East and West, and ready access to air and rail transportation have contributed to its strong warehousing and manufacturing base. The city is home to sizable distribution centers for several major retailers including but not limited to Target, Aldi and Lowe's Home Improvement. Its diverse manufacturers include Safran, Flowers Baking Company, TetraPak, Paccar Inc. and Peterbilt Motors among others. Denton is also known for its institutions of higher education including University of North Texas and Texas Woman's University and a regionally prominent medical sector. The city's growing health care facilities serve both north Texas and southern Oklahoma. These institutions include Columbia Medical Center Denton, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Medical City Dallas and The Heart Hospital Denton (a Baylor Scott & White facility). The city's tax base continues to experience strong growth. Fiscal 2024 TAV at $19.2 billion reflects a 33% increase over fiscal 2022 TAV. According to city representatives, as of May 2023, of the roughly 63,000 acres of land within the city limits, approximately 21,000 acres remain developable. Due to the ample availability of developable land coupled with the more than 103,000 acres of land within the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction, which could be annexed, the city is not expected to reach buildout for many decades. 7 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 4 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Key Drivers Financial Profile Financial Resilience -'aaa' Denton's financial resilience is driven by the combination of its 'High' revenue control assessment and 'High' expenditure control assessment, culminating in a 'Ample' budgetary flexibility assessment. • Revenue control assessment: High• Expenditure control assessment: High• Budgetary flexibility assessment: Ample • Minimum fund balance for current financial resilience assessment:>=7.5% • Current year fund balance to expenditure ratio: 27.6% (2023) • Five-year low fund balance to expenditure ratio: 26.3% (2023) Revenue Volatility -'Strongest' Denton's weakest historic three-year revenue performance is neutral to the Model Implied Rating. The revenue volatility metric is an estimate of potential revenue volatility based on the issuer's historical experience relative to the median for the Fitch-rated local government portfolio. The metric helps to differentiate issuers by the scale of revenue loss that would have to be addressed through revenue raising, cost controls or utilization of reserves through economic cycles. Issuer Position Within AA+ Model Implied Rating Issuer: Denton (TX)0.0 Type: City General Obligation 0.0Current: AA+, RO:Sta (2024/05/15)0.0 Strong AA+ Mid AA+ Low AA+ Fiscal Year 2023 AAF Notching Total d 0.0 Rating position post application of analytical overlay Metric Profile 9.37 9.37 Metric Profile Mapping AA+AA+ Analyst Input 2023 2023 Percentile Weight Percentile / Value Assessment Weight Financial Profile Financial Resilience Components Available Reserves (FB/Expenditures: 5-Year Low) (%)26.3%Revenue Control Assessment High High Expenditure Control Assessment High High Budgetary Flexibility Ample Ample Financial Resilience aaa aaa 100% Lowest Cumulative 3 Year Revenue Performance (+/-) since 2008 (%)5.2 Revenue Volatility(1)93%100% Demographic and Economic Strength Trend Population Trend (%)(2)2.3 89% 100% 89% Strongest 8% Unemployment Rate as Percentage of National Rate (%)(5) 97.2 51% 33% Population w/ Bachelor's Degree and Higher (%)(2) 40.0 74% 33% MHI as a % of the Portfolio Median (2)91.6 37% 33% Concentration & Size Population Size(2)(3) 150,435 100% 50% Economic Concentration (%)(2)(3)22.2 100% 50% Long-Term Liability Burden Liabilities/Personal Income (%)6.5 10.0 19%35% Liabilities/Governmental Revenues (%)(6)207.6 317.4 8%25% Carrying Costs/Governmental Expenditures (%)13.4 14.3 54%40% Source: Fitch Ratings (6) As a proxy for per capita personal income for sub-county levels of local government, Fitch calculates the ratio of money income to per capita income for the county in which the rated entity is located and applies that ratio to the entity's money income. The estimated per capita personal income figure is multiplied by population to estimate total personal income. (2) Population, Concentration, MHI and Educational Attainment data is lagged by one year e.g. 2021 data is used and displayed for fiscal year 2022. (1) Model directly uses revenue volatility. Percentiles are for information only: metric percentile represents the issuer; composite percentile represents the average of the issuer's class. The Revenue Volatility metric represents the issuer's revenue volatility relative to the median revenue volatility of the total issuer portfolio. Revenue Volatility is treated asymmetrically, where weight is marginal for issuers that exhibit low to moderate revenue volatility. For issuers with higher revenue volatility, this factor will moderately lower the metric profile, implying a somewhat reduced weighting for all other variables in these instances. 30%Weak 21% (3) Percentiles represent the class. Economic concentration is defined as the sum of the absolute deviation of the issuer from the national average proportion across major economic sectors. (4) Additional Analytical Factors (AAF) have a potential notching range of +2/-2 for each of the three categories and an overall IDR notching range of +3/-3. (5) County level data used for sub-county entities when the latest year's data is unavailable. If county data is unavailable, MSA data is used. MSA level data is used for cities that span multiple counties. aaa 35% Strongest 0% Midrange 26% Strongest 9% 54% MIR - Mapping Financial Profile Demographic & Economic Strength Long-Term Liability Burden MIR - Metric 100% Metric Metric Composite 8 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 5 Public Finance Tax Supported United States • Lowest three-year revenue performance (based on revenues dating back to 2005): 5.2% increase for the three- year period ending fiscal 2014 • Median issuer decline: -4.0% (2023) State-Specific Revenue/Expenditure Context & Budgetary Control Underpinning the Denton's ample budgetary flexibility is its high independent legal ability to raise operating revenues and high expenditure control. The city retains a significant margin below its statutory and city charter property tax limitations. Denton's fiscal 2024 tax rate of approximately $0.56068 per $100 of TAVprovides ample capacity below the $2.50 per $100 of TAV cap for operations and limited tax debt service. However, any increase in the operating tax rate which produces an annual operating levy increase of more than 3.5% (the voter approval tax rate for most local taxing units) requires a ratification election. The revenue cap does not apply to debt service tax levies. Moreover, the tax rate limitation excludes new additions to tax rolls and allows for banking of unused margin for up to three years. Denton's remaining control over property taxes and other local revenues such as fines, fees, licenses and permits is still sufficient to maintain a high level of revenue-raising flexibility. Expenditure flexibility is aided by the city's high-level of control over workforce costs. Police and fire salaries and benefits are determined via four-year meet and confer agreements, providing management with strong control over its largest expenditure. Moreover, there are no formal collective bargaining agreements with any of the city’s labor groups. Demographic and Economic Strength Population Trend -'Strongest' Based on the median of 10-year annual % change in population, Denton's population trend is assessed as 'Strongest'. Population trend: 2.3% 2022 median of 10-year annual % change in population (89th percentile) Unemployment, Educational Attainment and MHI Level -'Midrange' Theoverall strength of Denton's demographic and economic level indicators (unemployment rate, educational attainment, median household income [MHI]) in 2023 are assessed as 'Midrange' on a composite basis, performing at the 54th percentile of Fitch's local government rating portfolio. This is due to high education attainment levels and midrange unemployment rate offsetting low median-issuer indexed adjusted MHI. • Unemployment rate as percentage of national rate: 97.2% 2023 (51st percentile), relative to the national rate of 3.6% • Percent of population with a bachelor's degree or higher: 40.0% (2022) (74th percentile) • MHI as a percent of the portfolio median: 91.6% (2022) (37th percentile) Economic Concentration and Population Size - 'Strongest' Denton's population in 2022 was of sufficient size and the economy was sufficiently diversified to qualify for Fitch's highest overall size/diversification category. The composite metric acts asymmetrically, with most issuers (above the 15th percentile for each metric) sufficiently diversified to minimize risks associated with small population and economic concentration. Downward effects of the metric on the Metric Profile are most pronounced for the least economically diverse issuers (in the 5th percentile for the metric or lower). The economic concentration percentage shown below is defined as the sum of the absolute deviation of the percentage of personal income by major economic sectors relative to the U.S. distribution. • Population size: 150,435 (2022) (above the 15th percentile) • Economic concentration: 22.2% (2023) (above the 15th percentile) Long-Term Liability Burden Long-Term Liability Burden -'Weak' 9 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 6 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Denton's liabilities to personal income and liabilities to governmental revenue have deteriorated while carrying costs to governmental expenditures remain midrange. The long-term liability composite metric in 2023 is at the 30th percentile, indicating somewhat elevated liability burden relative to the Fitch local government rating portfolio. • Liabilities to personal income: 10.0% Analyst Input (19th percentile) (vs. 6.5% 2023 Actual) • Liabilities to governmental revenue: 317.4% Analyst Input (8th percentile) (vs. 207.6% 2023 Actual)• Carrying costs to governmental expenditures: 14.3% Analyst Input (54th percentile) (vs. 13.3% 2023 Actual) Pension Adjustments This is a text exhibit 'Locals-Fitchs Pension Adjustments-NLG'. See instructions in side pane. Additional Insight In November 2023, voters approved a $291.4 million GO finance roadway, public safety, affordable housing, facility upgrades and park-related projects. Following the issuance of the city's$135.2 million series 2024 GO bonds, the city will have roughly $260 million in authorized, but unissued debt remaining from its November 2023 and 2019 bond programs. Given its strong growth projections, the city has a robust capital improvement program, which will necessitate the issuance of debt over the next several years. The city's pensions are provided through the Texas Municipal Retirement System, an agent multiple-employer defined benefit plan, and the Denton Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, a single-employer plan. The city consistently meets its actuarially determined contribution for both plans. Under GASB Statement 68, the city reports a fiscal 2023 net pension liability (NPL) of $138 million for both plans combined, with fiduciary assets covering 83% of total pension liabilities at the plans' 6.75% investment return assumption. Using a more conservative Fitch-adjusted 6% investment return assumption, the ratio of assets to liability declines to 75%. Analyst Inputs to the Model Analyst inputs to the model reflect metric adjustments to account for historical data anomalies, forward-looking performance shifts, or non-recurring events that may otherwise skew the time series. Liabilities to personal income was adjusted to 10.0% from 6.5% when accounting for the projected par amounts of the city's series 2024 GO bonds and COs. Liabilities as a percentageof governmental revenues was also adjusted to reflect the city's forthcoming debt issuance, while netting out pension and OPEB costs covered by the enterprise funds. The fiscal 2023 carrying costs are net of estimated enterprise fund related contributions toward the city's pensions and OPEB. The carrying costs were adjusted to reflect fiscal 2024 scheduled debt service payments associated with the city's outstanding GO and CO debt, net of debt service for the self-supporting utility funds ESG Considerations The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' meansESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/topics/esg/products#esg-relevance-score. 10 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 7 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Financial Summary ($000,Audited Fiscal YearsEndingSep. 30)2021 2022 2023 General Fund Revenues Property Tax 49,500 49,307 57,224 Sales Tax 45,405 51,992 56,704 Income Tax -- - Other Tax 372 1,192 27 Total Taxes - Undifferentiated -- - Intergovernmental 4,167 2,508 2,962 Other Revenue 35,375 40,670 43,457 Total 134,818 145,669 160,374 General Fund Expenditures General Government 26,461 26,563 33,498 Public Safety 80,848 86,682 96,318 Educational -- - Debt Service -- - Capital Outlay 476 540 475 Other Expenditures 14,179 16,265 19,236 Total 121,964 130,051 149,528 Transfers In and Other Sources 361 571 224 Transfers Out and Other Sources 8,497 9,230 11,929 Net Transfers & Other (8,137) (8,659) (11,705) Adjustment for Bond Proceeds and ExtraordinaryOne-Time Uses --- Net Op. Surplus (Deficit) After Transfers 4,718 6,959 (859) Net Op. Surplus (Deficit)/ (Total Expenditures + Transfers Out and Other Uses)(%)3.62 5 -0.53 Total Fund Balance 38,500 45,459 44,600 Unrestricted Fund Balance 38,500 45,459 44,600 Other Available Fund Balances -- - Total Available Unrestricted Reserves (GF + Other)38,500 45,459 44,600 Available Reserves as % of Spending (Adj for Bond Proceeds and Other One-Time Uses)29.51 32.64 27.62 Source: audited financial reports 11 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 8 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Long-Term Liability Burden ($000) ($000,Audited Fiscal YearsEndingSep. 30)2023 Direct Debt 513,038 Less: Self-Supporting Debt 111,900 Net DirectDebt 401,138 Fitch Adjusted NPL 221,092 Net Direct Debt + Fitch-Adjusted net pension liabilities (NPL)622,230 Population 150,353 Per Capita Personal Income 52,529 Estimated Personal Income ($000)7,897,929 Net Debt + Fitch-Adjusted NPL /Personal Income (%)7.9 Total Governmental Revenues 261,711 Net Direct Debt + Fitch Adjusted NPL as Percentage of Governmental Revenue (%)237.75 Debt Service (Net of State Support)22,556 Actuarially Determined Pension Contributions 23,945 Actual OPEB Contributions 1,778 Total Governmental Expenditures 317,064 Carrying Costs/Governmental Expenditures (%)15.22 Source: auditedfinancial reports , US Census Bureau, US Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) Note: Figures above do not reflect any Analyst Input Adjustments. 12 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 9 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Summary Description Final Value Budgetary Flexibility Assessments Revenue Control Assessment High Expenditure Control Assessment High Collective Bargaining and Resolution Framework High Workforce Outcomes High Cost Drivers Midrange Metrics Assessments Financial Profile - Financial Resilience aaa Financial Profile - Revenue Volatility Strongest Demographic & Economic Strength - Trend Strongest Demographic & Economic Strength - Level Midrange Demographic & Economic Strength - Concentration & Size Strongest Long-Term Liability Burden Weak Metric Profile Mapping AA+ Metric Profile 9.37 Additional Analytical Factors Total Notching -capped Financial Profile Fiscal Oversight Revenue Capacity Contingent Risks Non-Recurring Support or Spending Deferrals Political Risks Management Practices Demographic & Economic Strength Economic and Institutional Strength RevenueConcentration Risks School District Resources Long-Term Liability Burden PensionFunding Assumptions Pension Contributions OPEB Debt Structure Capital Demands and Affordability Model Implied Rating -Mapping AA+ Model Implied Rating -Metric 9.37 Outliers and Developing Situations Considerations No Notching Rationale - 1 Notching Rationale - 2 13 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 10 Public Finance Tax Supported United States Issuer Default Rating/ Issuer Default Credit Opinion AA+ Source: Fitch Ratings 14 Denton (TX) [General Government]New Issue Ň May 30, 2024 fitchratings.com 11 Public Finance Tax Supported United States SOLICITATION & PARTICIPATION STATUS For information on the solicitation status of the ratings included within this report, please refer to the solicitation status shown in the relevant entity’s summary page of the Fitch Ratings website. For information on the participation status in the rating process of an issuer listed in this report, please refer to the most recent rating action commentary for the relevant issuer, available on the Fitch Ratings website. zxcvbnm729mnbvcxz481 DISCLAIMER & DISCLOSURES All Fitch Ratings (Fitch) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: https://www.fitchratings.com/understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following https://www.fitchratings.com/rating-definitions-document details Fitch's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders’ relevant interests are available at https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory. Fitch may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA-or FCA-registered Fitch Ratings company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the Fitch Ratings website. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. Fitch Ratings makes routine, commonly-accepted adjustments to reported financial data in accordance with the relevant criteria and/or industry standards to provide financial metric consistency for entities in the same sector or asset class. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001. Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory),other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO. Copyright © 2024by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved.z 15 Summary: Denton, Texas; CP; General Obligation Primary Credit Analyst: Calix Sholander, Englewood + 1 (303) 721 4255; calix.sholander@spglobal.com Secondary Contact: Adam Steele, Englewood; adam.steele@spglobal.com Table Of Contents Credit Highlights Outlook Related Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 23, 2024 116 Summary: Denton, Texas; CP; General Obligation Credit Profile US$240.61 mil certs of oblig ser 2024 dtd 06/01/2024 due 02/15/2054 Long Term Rating AA+/Stable New US$135.175 mil GO rfdg and imp bnds ser 2024 dtd 06/01/2024 due 02/15/2044 Long Term Rating AA+/Stable New Denton Extendable Comm Paper Nts ser A dtd 03/24/2020 due 03/01/2060 Short Term Rating A-1+ Affirmed Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Credit Highlights • S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'AA+' long-term rating to the City of Denton, Texas' proposed $240.6 million series 2024 certificates of obligation (COs) and $135.2 million series 2024 general obligation (GO) refunding and improvement bonds. • At the same time, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'AA+' long-term rating on the city's existing GO debt and COs outstanding, as well as its 'A-1+' short-term rating on the city's commercial paper (CP) notes. • The outlook, where applicable, is stable. Security The bonds and certificates constitute direct obligations of the city, payable from a direct annual ad valorem tax levied, within the limits prescribed by law, on all taxable property located within the city. The certificates are further secured by a limited pledge (not to exceed $1,000) of surplus net revenues of Denton's utility system. Given the limited nature of the additional pledged revenues, we base our ratings on these obligations on the city's ad valorem tax pledge. Despite state statutory tax-rate limitations, we do not differentiate between the city's limited-tax debt and its general creditworthiness because the ad valorem tax is not derived from a measurably narrower tax base and there are no limitations on the fungibility of resources, which support our view of the city's overall ability and willingness to pay debt service. Proceeds from the COs will fund various city infrastructure and facility improvements, and the GO bond proceeds will be used for various capital projects and to refund a portion of the city's existing debt for interest savings. The 'A-1+' short-term rating on the CP notes is based on the city's 'AA+' long-term rating and strong market access to take out the financing with GO bonds or sell rollover notes, if needed. For more information see, "Denton, Texas" published April 13, 2020, on RatingsDirect. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 23, 2024 217 Credit overview Denton benefits from its favorable location within the greater Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan statistical area. The city continues to experience rapid assessed value (AV) growth fueled by a mix of residential and commercial development. Its sales tax base has also benefitted from population growth, as well as retail development, most notably the buildout of the Rayzor Ranch mixed-use development. We expect the city's AV will continue to exhibit strong growth over the outlook period, given ongoing residential and commercial development, as well as plans for several industrial projects, warehouses, and distribution centers. Denton's revenue growth and very strong management have allowed the city to consistently maintain strong budgetary performance while managing its rising growth-related capital and service costs. In fiscal 2023, the city intentionally spent reserves for one-time capital expenditures and to bring its general fund balance closer to its formal policy level of 20%-25% of expenditures. For fiscal 2024, the city adopted a balanced budget, with year-to-date revenue figures trending above budgeted figures. We expect the city will continue to exhibit strong budgetary performance while using one-time spending to keep available reserves close to its policy range. After this issuance, the city will have approximately $260 million in authorized but unissued GO debt that the city anticipates issuing over the next several years. The city's capital improvement plan (CIP) also shows the city issuing about $103 million in COs over the next two years. Therefore, and given Denton's ongoing growth-related capital needs, we expect the city's debt profile will remain elevated and a limiting credit factor for the foreseeable future. The rating also reflects our view of the city's: • Very strong, expanding economy, with the University of North Texas and Texas Woman's University providing a stabilizing effect on the local economy; • Stable financial performance, with very strong reserves and liquidity, in line with its formal reserve policy; • Strong financial management policies and practices, highlighted by regular budget and investment monitoring, investment and debt management policies, and robust long-term financial and capital planning. The institutional framework score is strong; and • High debt profile, which is reflective of rapid growth in the city, with average amortization. We do not view pension and other postemployment benefits (OPEB) as a credit pressure given the adequate-funded status of the city's pension plans and limited OPEB liability. For more information, see "Pension Spotlight: Texas," published April 4, 2023. Environmental, social, and governance Compared with other locations nationally, data from S&P Global Sustainable1 shows Denton County, that contains the City of Denton, faces elevated exposure to water stress. However, the city has developed a Drought Contingency Plan that details steps to be taken to maintain water access in various levels of drought conditions. The city's social, and governance factors are neutral considerations in our credit rating analysis. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 23, 2024 3 Summary: Denton, Texas; CP; General Obligation 18 Outlook The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the city will continue to manage the capital and operating needs associated with its rapid growth, while maintaining strong budgetary performance and very strong available reserves. Downside scenario We could lower the rating if growth-related pressures negatively affect budgetary performance, resulting in sustained operating deficits, decreasing its reserve below the city's formal policy. Upside scenario We could raise the rating if the city maintains its very strong available reserves while managing its rapid growth and if its debt profile moderates to levels commensurate with those of higher-rated peers. Denton, Texas--Key credit metrics Most recent Historical information 2023 2022 2021 Very strong economy Projected per capita EBI % of U.S.92.3 Market value per capita ($)129,036 Population 148,950 143,837 County unemployment rate(%)3.2 Market value ($000)19,219,844 16,721,124 14,403,105 Ten largest taxpayers % of taxable value 4.0 Strong budgetary performance Operating fund result % of expenditures -0.7 4.6 3.6 Total governmental fund result % of expenditures 19.6 16.9 17.0 Very strong budgetary flexibility Available reserves % of operating expenditures 27.6 32.6 29.6 Total available reserves ($000)44,600 45,459 38,500 Very strong liquidity Total government cash % of governmental fund expenditures 123.1 152.5 154.4 Total government cash % of governmental fund debt service 765.2 926.6 963.2 Very strong management Financial Management Assessment Strong Very weak debt and long-term liabilities Debt service % of governmental fund expenditures 16.1 16.5 16.0 Net direct debt % of governmental fund revenue 355.2 Overall net debt % of market value 10.7 Direct debt 10-year amortization (%)50.6 Required pension contribution % of governmental fund expenditures 10.9 OPEB actual contribution % of governmental fund expenditures 0.8 WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 23, 2024 4 Summary: Denton, Texas; CP; General Obligation 19 Denton, Texas--Key credit metrics (cont.) Most recent Historical information 2023 2022 2021 Strong institutional framework Data points and ratios may reflect analytical adjustments. EBI--Effective buying income. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits. Related Research • Through The ESG Lens 3.0: The Intersection Of ESG Credit Factors And U.S. Public Finance Credit Factors, March 2, 2022 • 2023 Update Of Institutional Framework For U.S. Local Governments Ratings Detail (As Of May 23, 2024) Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Denton GO Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Denton GO rfdg bnds ser 2020A dtd 11/15/2020 due 02/15/2031 Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.spglobal.com/ratings for further information. Complete ratings information is available to RatingsDirect subscribers at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.spglobal.com/ratings. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 23, 2024 5 Summary: Denton, Texas; CP; General Obligation 20 WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 23, 2024 6 STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating- related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Copyright © 2024 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. 21 May 19, 2023 Ms. Cassandra Ogden Director of Finance Denton 215 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Ms. Ogden: Fitch Ratings has assigned one or more ratings and/or otherwise taken rating action(s), as detailed in the attached Notice of Rating Action. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed. Fitch seeks to continuously improve its ratings criteria and methodologies, and periodically updates the descriptions on its website of its criteria and methodologies for securities of a given type. The criteria and methodology used to determine a rating action are those in effect at the time the rating action is taken, which for public ratings is the date of the related rating action commentary. Each rating action commentary provides information about the criteria and methodology used to arrive at the stated rating, which may differ from the general criteria and methodology for the applicable security type posted on the website at a given time. For this reason, you should always consult the applicable rating action commentary for the most accurate information on the basis of any given public rating. 22 Ratings are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. Ratings are not a recommendation or suggestion, directly or indirectly, to you or any other person, to buy, sell, make or hold any investment, loan or security or to undertake any investment strategy with respect to any investment, loan or security or any issuer. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any investment, loan or security for a particular investor (including without limitation, any accounting and/or regulatory treatment), or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect of any investment, loan or security. Fitch is not your advisor, nor is Fitch providing to you or any other party any financial advice, or any legal, auditing, accounting, appraisal, valuation or actuarial services. A rating should not be viewed as a replacement for such advice or services. The assignment of a rating by Fitch does not constitute consent by Fitch to the use of its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement or other filings under US, UK or any other relevant securities laws. Fitch does not consent to the inclusion of its ratings in any offering document in any instance in which US, UK or any other relevant securities laws requires such consent. Fitch does not consent to the inclusion of any written letter communicating its rating action in any offering document. You understand that Fitch has not consented to, and will not consent to, being named as an "expert" in connection with any registration statement or other filings under US, UK or any other relevant securities laws, including but not limited to Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. Fitch is not an "underwriter" or "seller" as those terms are defined under applicable securities laws or other regulatory guidance, rules or recommendations, including without limitation Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, nor has Fitch performed the roles or tasks associated with an "underwriter" or "seller" under this engagement. Fitch will continue to monitor the credit quality of and maintain ratings on the Issuer/Securities. It is important that you promptly provide us with all information that may be material to the ratings so that our ratings continue to be appropriate. Ratings may be raised, lowered, withdrawn, or placed on Rating Watch due to changes in, additions to, accuracy of or the inadequacy of information or for any other reason Fitch deems sufficient. Nothing in this letter is intended to or should be construed as creating a fiduciary relationship between Fitch and you or between us and any user of the ratings. In this letter, "Fitch" means Fitch Ratings, Inc. and any successor in interest. Public ratings will be valid and effective only upon publication of the ratings on Fitch’s website. We are pleased to have had the opportunity to be of service to you. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us at any time. Laura Porter Managing Director - Global Group Head Public Finance LP/em Enc: Notice of Rating Action (Doc ID:257579 Rev 0) 23 Page 1 of 1 Notice of Rating Action Bond Description Rating Type Rating Action Rating Outlook/ Watch Eff Date Notes Denton (TX) certificates of oblig ser 2023 Unenhanced Long Term Rating New Rating AA+ RO:Sta 2023-05-19 00:00:37.0 Denton (TX) certificates of oblig ser 2023 Long Term Rating New Rating AA+RO:Sta 2023-05-19 00:00:37.0 Denton (TX) GO rfdg & improv bonds ser 2023 Unenhanced Long Term Rating New Rating AA+ RO:Sta 2023-05-19 00:00:37.0 Denton (TX) GO rfdg & improv bonds ser 2023 Long Term Rating New Rating AA+RO:Sta 2023-05-19 00:00:37.0 Key:RO: Rating Outlook, RW: Rating Watch, Pos: Positive, Neg: Negative, Sta: Stable, Evo: Evolving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lassification Moody's S&P Fitch Meaning Aaa AAA AAA Prime Grade Aa1 AA+ AA+ Aa2 AA AA High Grade Aa3 AA- AA- Investment Grade A1 A+ A+ A2 A A Upper Medium Grade A3 A-A- Baa1 BBB+ BBB+ Baa2 BBB BBB Lower Medium Grade Baa3 BBB- BBB- Ba1 BB+ BB+ Ba2 BB BB Non-Investment Grade Speculative Ba3 BB- BB- B1 B+B+ B2 B B Highly Speculative B3 B-B- Junk Caa1 CCC+ CCC+ Substantial Risks Caa2 CCC CCC Extremely Speculative Caa3 CCC- CCC-In Default with Little Ca CC CC+Prospect of Recovery CCC CC-In Default DDD BOND RATING CHART Note: City's current ratings for all general obligation debt are: AA+ from S&P and Fitch. Moody's has not rated the City's new bonds since 2011 but maintains a surveillance rating of Aa2 for any outstanding general obligation debt (2011 and prior). 32 June 7, 2024 Report No. 2024-19 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: An Evaluation of Wait Times at the City of Denton Landfill BACKGROUND: Since 1984, the Solid Waste and Recycling (SWR)Department has operated the City of Denton Landfill (the landfill), as a regional facility, to manage waste in a manner that complies with our State operational permit, is fiscally responsible, and is protective of the environment. The landfill processes approximately 650 transactions accounting for 1,500 tons of material received daily. On average, a landfill customer will spend approximately 41 minutes in the facility, from when they check in at the scale house until they depart the landfill. This report aims to evaluate wait times, provide an update on metrics management, and communicate planned updates to the facility intended to make the landfill experience safer and quicker. DISCUSSION: The Landfill operates as a regional facility, accepting Type I municipal solid waste, green waste, and construction and demolition debris from residents, regional haulers, and businesses. In FY 22-23, the landfill accepted 357,369 tons of material for disposal, and the green waste was acceptedas DynoDirt Feedstock. Given the volume of material and number of vehicles serviced daily, in addition to the requirements listed in our State Operational Permit (MSW1590B) extended waittimes may be encountered. The Landfill is open to accept waste Monday through Saturday, 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. Our busiest operational day is Monday. The landfill services mostly residential customers on Saturday. On average, the busiest times at the landfill are 7 to 9 a.m., through lunchtime, and 2:30 to 4 p.m. Other events that affect the volume of landfill traffic include, but are not limited to, time of year, rain, disaster debris management, disposal location within the permitted landfill cells, and how quickly individuals can unload their vehicles. Permit MSW1590B limits the size of the active working face/disposal area at the landfill. While landfill staff has bifurcated the queue, traffic volume has exacerbated disposal wait times. In February 2023, the landfill opened a Public Disposal Facility, which separated residential traffic from commercial traffic and sent them to a smaller, safer site to unload their material. This change has reduced residential customer wait times by approximately 13 minutes in the facility. The Landfill will upgrade onsite scales, technology, and traffic patterns to address potentially long queues for access to the facility. This project will involve constructing a temporary scale house facility, demolishing existing pit scales, refurbishing the existing scale house building, installing modern bridge scales, and upgrading onsite technology. In addition to making the facility safer for 33 June 7, 2024 Report No. 2024-19 customers, the improvements should allow staff to process customers into and out of the facility quicker and minimize the need to exit a vehicle to complete transactions. Construction is anticipated to begin in Q4 of 2024 and be complete within 6 months. While we anticipate increased traffic and wait times during the replacement of the scale house, SWR plans to complete outreach, which includes mailing collateral to existing customers, providing on-the-spot education and information to customers on-site, and coordinating with marketing and communications to share information on City social media channels, and the City’s website; 30-45 days in advance to inform potential customers of the inconvenience. Over the next few months, SWR will provide an update on internal wait times as well as develop monitoring for the queue to access the facility. Operational improvements and events that may have increased congestion at the facility will be highlighted. STAFF CONTACT: Brian Boerner, CPM, CHMM Solid Waste Director Brian.Boerner@cityofdenton.com (940) 349-8001 REQUESTOR: Staff Initiated STAFF TIME TO COMPLETE REPORT: 1 hour PARTICIPATING DEPARTMENTS: Solid Waste and Recycling 34 June 7, 2024 Report No. 2024-20 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Update on Airport Financial Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Denton Enterprise Airport (the Airport), a public airport that accepts federal grants, must comply with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Grant Assurances, including maintaining a self-sustaining fee and rental structure. The Airport generates revenue primarily through property lease rents and various fees. Despite record activity in recent years, the Airport's revenue has not covered operational costs, leading to a budget deficit. The City Council hired Airport Management Consulting Group (AMCG) to conduct a financial analysis to make rate recommendations and fees to achieve full cost recovery. BACKGROUND: As a public airport that accepts federal grant funding, the Airport must comply with the 39 FAA Grant Assurances. An essential requirement under these obligations is that the Airport “will maintain a fee and rental structure for the facilities and services at the airport which will make the airport as self-sustaining as possible.” This codifies a practice that dates to the beginning of the aviation industry – that airports are funded by those who use them. The Airport generates the vast majority of its revenue through two avenues: 1.Rent revenue from leased Airport property. This revenue is prescribed by long-term lease agreements that receive periodic Consumer Price Index adjustments and2.Rates and Fees on aeronautical or non-aeronautical activities. The airport currently chargesthe following fees:a.Fuel Flowage Fee b.Percentage of Gross Receipts Fee* c.Aeronautical Permit Fee**d.Airport Access Fee *Applies to certain charges of fixed-based operators only**Currently only utilized as a development application fee During the last five (5) years, the Airport has experienced record amounts of activity, driving its operational and infrastructure costs. During this same period, the Airport revenues were insufficient to recover operations costs. As a result, the fund balance of the Airport Fund has been steadily reduced due to the ongoing budget deficit. If not addressed, this ongoing deficit will, over time, utilize the remaining available fund balance. On Dec. 12, 2023, the City Council approved a contract for a consultant, AMCG, to perform a financial analysis to assess and make recommendations regarding Airport rates and fees with the goal of full Airport cost recovery. 35 June 7, 2024 Report No. 2024-20 Airport Financial Analysis The Financial Analysis involves three elements: 1. A General Aviation Fee Study to recommend aeronautical fees to help recover the operating expenses and non-operating sources of funds that have been and are anticipatedto be incurred by the City relating to the planning, development, operation, andmanagement of the Airport.2.An Airport Financial Allocation Analysis to allocate and analyze the Airport’s operating revenues, expenses, and non-operating sources and uses of funds by the Airport’s primaryfunctional areas and revenue streams.3.An Economic Impact Analysis to include an analysis of total direct airport employment(City and commercial operators) and tax revenue (e.g., property taxes, sales tax, etc.). The Financial Analysis will assist the Airport’s policymakers, management, and staff in the identification of the Airport’s operating revenues and sources of funds that need to be enhanced, and operating expenses and uses of funds need to be managed to fulfill the City’s FAA airport sponsor assurance obligation. Additionally, as the Airport grows, the information gained from the financial study will be critical to ensure that the Airport fund can support the operational and infrastructure enhancements required to sustain that growth. DISCUSSION: On May 24, the City received the results of AMCG’s General Aviation Fee Study (see attached report). The report summarizes various general aviation fees used by airports nationwide then identifies nine comparable airports (airports similar in size, condition, circumstance, and activities to Denton Enterprise Airport) and competitive airports (airports in proximity to Denton Enterprise Airport and serve a similar market). Based on an analysis of comparable and competitive airports, the consultants recommended the following assumptions be used in developing suggested rate and fee amounts in its Financial Allocation Analysis: 1. Continue to charge a fuel flowage fee. 2. Implement a landing fee.3.Continue to charge a percentage of gross receipts fee to fixed-based operators.4.Expand the development application fee by implementing a permit fee for classes ofaeronautical activities conducted at the airport.5.Expand the access fee to include an initial fee and annual renewal fee. Landing Fee Implementing a landing fee is justified as “the most equitable, cost-recovery mechanism for the City, and a general aviation fee program which includes a landing fee is consistent with the best practice approach. While a fuel flowage fee is only paid by those aircraft operators purchasing (or dispensing) fuel, at the Airport, the landing fee is paid by all aircraft.” A landing fee would help correct the inequity of Airport users not purchasing fuel having their costs of operations subsidized by those who do purchase fuel. 36 June 7, 2024 Report No. 2024-20 It is important to note that as the Airport intends to recover its costs fully, a new fee type will help ensure the proper allocation of that total cost recovery. Next Steps City staff provided direction to AMCG to develop a rates and fees structure, that included the above assumptions. Due to the planning and stakeholder communication required to implement a landing fee, staff also directed that any landing fee rate recommendations be recommended for implementation no earlier than FY 2025-26. Once AMCG’s recommended rates and fees for FY 2024-25 are developed and reviewed by staff, they may be recommended for inclusion in the FY 2024-25 budget. CONCLUSION: The AMCG's analysis recommends several current rate and fee structure changes. These changes aim to ensure equitable cost recovery and financial sustainability for the airport. As part of the budget process, staff will present new rates and fee structure to the City Council for consideration for FY 2024-25 so that the City can comply with its federal obligation to be as self-sustaining as possible. ATTACHMENTS: 1. AMCG General Aviation Fee Study Report STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Adams Airport Director Ryan.Adams@cityofdenton.com (940) 349-8565 REQUESTOR: Staff Initiated STAFF TIME TO COMPLETE REPORT: 3 hours PARTICIPATING DEPARTMENTS: Airport Finance 37 May 24, 2024 General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) City of Denton Denton Enterprise Airport 38 9085 East Mineral Circle | Suite 315 | Centennial, Colorado | 80112-3499 | 303.792.2700 | www.aviationmanagement.com May 24, 2024 Ryan Adams Director of Airport 5000 Airport Road Denton, Texas 76207 RE: General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) Dear Ryan: In accordance with your request and authorization, Aviation Management Consulting Group (AMCG) has prepared a Phase I of the General Aviation Fee Study for the Denton Enterprise Airport for your review and consideration. It is AMCG’s recommendation that the City of Denton establish general aviation fees utilizing a cost recovery-based approach or methodology, not a market-based approach. Based on the type of general aviation fees selected by Airport management for implementation, AMCG will provide a recommendation for the fee amounts and develop a General Aviation Fee Schedule in Phase II. AMCG is pleased to have been called on to conduct this General Aviation Fee Study. Please contact me if you have any questions pertaining to this analysis or the recommendations provided. Helping your aviation management excellence, David C. Benner, C.M. Managing Principal Aviation Management Consulting Group 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) i City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 1 II. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 2 A. Scope of Work ................................................................................................. 2 B. Project Approach ............................................................................................. 2 C. General Aviation Fee Summary ...................................................................... 2 D. Current Situation ............................................................................................. 3 1. Fuel Flowage Fee ................................................................................... 3 2. Percentage of Gross Receipts Fee ......................................................... 3 3. Aeronautical Permit Fee .......................................................................... 3 4. Airport Access Fee .................................................................................. 3 III. INDUSTRY PRACTICES ........................................................................................ 4 A. Fuel Flowage Fees .......................................................................................... 4 B. Landing Fees .................................................................................................. 4 C. Aircraft Parking Fees ....................................................................................... 5 D. Percentage of Gross Receipts ........................................................................ 5 E. Aeronautical Permit Fees ................................................................................ 6 F. Based Aircraft Fee .......................................................................................... 6 G. Through-the-Fence Fee .................................................................................. 6 H. Airport Access Fees ........................................................................................ 7 IV. SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS ....................................................................................... 8 A. Comparable Airports ....................................................................................... 8 B. Competitive Airports ...................................................................................... 10 V. RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 12 A. Cost Center Approach ................................................................................... 12 B. Fees Recommended ..................................................................................... 12 1. Fuel Flowage Fee ................................................................................. 12 2. Landing Fee .......................................................................................... 13 3. Percentage of Gross Receipts Fees ..................................................... 14 4. Aeronautical Permit Fee ........................................................................ 14 5. Airport Access Fees .............................................................................. 14 C. Fees Not Recommended .............................................................................. 15 1. Aircraft Parking Fees ............................................................................. 15 2. Based Aircraft Fee ................................................................................ 15 3. Through-the-Fence Fee ........................................................................ 15 D. Adjustment of Fees ....................................................................................... 15 VI. FEES CALCULATION .......................................................................................... 17 A. Fees Selected ............................................................................................... 17 B. Financial Analysis ......................................................................................... 17 C. Establishment of Fees ................................................................................... 17 1. Fee Calculation Analysis....................................................................... 17 2. Projected General Aviation Fee Revenue ............................................. 17 VII. GENERAL AVIATION FEE SCHEDULE .............................................................. 18 40 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 1 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Airport:Denton Enterprise Airport 5000 Airport Road Denton, Texas 76207 Scope of Work: The City has engaged Aviation Management Consulting Group (AMCG) to prepare a General Aviation Fee Study for the Denton Enterprise Airport. Based on the type of general aviation fees selected by Airport management for implementation in Phase I, AMCG will provide a recommendation for the fee amounts and develop a General Aviation Fee Schedule in Phase II. Date of Report: May 24, 2024 Methodology: AMCG recommends that the City establish general aviation fees utilizing a cost recovery-based approach or methodology, not solely a market-based approach. Fee Recommendations: The following table identifies the recommended general aviation fees for the Airport. Type of Fee Fee Fuel Flowage Fee TBD in Phase II Landing Fee TBD in Phase II Percentage of Gross Receipts TBD in Phase II Aeronautical Permit Fees TBD in Phase II Airport Access Fee TBD in Phase II 41 INTRODUCTION General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 2 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) II. INTRODUCTION A. Scope of Work The City of Denton (City) has engaged Aviation Management Consulting Group (AMCG) to prepare a General Aviation Fee Study for the Denton Enterprise Airport (Airport). Based on the type of general aviation fees selected by Airport management for implementation, AMCG will provide a recommendation for the fee amounts and develop a Geneal Aviation Fee Schedule for the Airport in Phase II. To achieve this objective, AMCG identified current industry practices for establishing general aviation fees including identification of the types of fees that are generally charged and the measures that are generally utilized in the industry. The results of this analysis, AMCG’s recommendations for the structure of a general aviation fee program, and the methodology for determining the general aviation fees are outlined in this summary report. A General Aviation Fee Schedule for the Airport will be developed in Phase II. B. Project Approach To achieve the scope of work, AMCG completed the following work program: identified the elements of the existing general aviation fee program at the Airport, identified current industry practices, obtained and analyzed general aviation fees (and related information) from comparable airports and competitive airports identified, and provided recommendations to Airport management for the methodology and types of the general aviation fees. Based on the structure of the general aviation fees selected by Airport management, AMCG will provide recommendations for the fee amounts in Phase II. C. General Aviation Fee Summary Table 1 provides a brief overview of general aviation fees typically charged by airports, the current situation, industry practices, and recommendations for the City’s consideration. It is important to note that additional fees may be imposed by the City or commercial aeronautical operators at the Airport. However, this analysis is focused solely on general aviation fees charged by the City, as the airport sponsor, for the aeronautical use of the airport. Each of the below fees are addressed in detail in this report. 42 INTRODUCTION General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 3 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) Table 1 - General Aviation Fee Summary Type of General Aviation Fee Current Situation Industry Practices Recommendation Fuel Flowage Fee Yes Most common Yes Landing Fee No Moderately common Yes Aircraft Parking Fees No Moderately common No Percentage of Gross Receipts Yes Less common Yes Aeronautical Permit Fees Yes Moderately common Yes Based Aircraft Fee No Less common No Through-the-Fence Fee No Less common No Airport Access Fee Yes Moderately common Yes D. Current Situation It is AMCG’s understanding that the City currently charges the following general aviation fees at the Airport. 1. Fuel Flowage Fee The Airport charges a fuel flowage fee (i.e., aviation fuel delivery fee) for the Fixed Based Operator (FBO) of $0.17 per gallon and $0.29 per gallon for non-commercial self-fueling. The fuel flowage fee is charged based on the number of gallons delivered to the fuel storage facility. 2. Percentage of Gross Receipts Fee Based on discussions with Airport management, AMCG understands the FBO lease agreement includes a 12% fee for the gross receipts related to hangar and tiedown used on the FBO’s leased premises by transient customers. 3. Aeronautical Permit Fee The Airport charges an aeronautical permit fee (i.e., lease development application fee) of $1,000 for any development application, regardless of the type of activity. 4. Airport Access Fee The Airport charges an airport access fee (i.e., access card fee) of $20.00 for a new or replacement card without a renewal fee. 43 INDUSTRY PRACTICES General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 4 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) III. INDUSTRY PRACTICES Based on industry experience and supported by the information contained in AMCG’s proprietary industry database (which is utilized to track, monitor, and analyze general aviation fee data and trends), AMCG has identified current industry practices for establishing general aviation fees. A summary of these findings which, in AMCG’s opinion, are representative of current industry practices for establishing general aviation fees is outlined in this section. A. Fuel Flowage Fees Commonality – Fuel flowage fees are currently the most common general aviation fee implemented by airport sponsors. Methodology – When a fuel flowage fee is charged by an airport sponsor, fueling entities (both commercial and non-commercial) are typically required to collect and/or pay a fuel flowage fee for each gallon of fuel sold or dispensed at the airport through a lease agreement. Fuel flowage fees are typically paid on a “cents per gallon” basis and range from $0.05 per gallon to $0.40 per gallon. Typically, airports served by air carriers exempt these entities from fuel flowage fees since air carriers pay landing fees under agreement with the airport sponsor. Also, government aircraft may be exempt from fuel flowage fees. Collection – Fuel flowage fees are typically collected directly by the airport sponsor on a monthly or annual basis. B. Landing Fees Commonality – Historically, landing fees have not been charged by airport sponsors to general aviation aircraft operators. Due to advancements in technology, more airports are beginning to charge landing fees as an alternative to, or in addition to, fuel flowage fees. Methodology – When charged, landing/departure fees are commonly based on aircraft weight and a “cents per 1,000 pounds” approach using historic airport costs and the gross landed weight for all aircraft using the airport. In the alternative, landing/departure fees can be charged in accordance with an established schedule (i.e., aircraft within designated weight ranges pay the same fee) and a minimum fee may be specified. In some cases, based aircraft and/or aircraft under a specified weight (e.g., 5,000 pounds max gross landed weight) are exempt from landing/departure fees. Collection – Landing fees may be collected directly by the airport sponsor, or the airport sponsor may have an agreement with a commercial operator to collect and remit landing fees. The agreement may allow the commercial operator to retain a portion of the landing fees collected as compensation for services rendered by the commercial operator. The amount retained is often referred to as an administrative fee. 44 INDUSTRY PRACTICES General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 5 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) C. Aircraft Parking Fees Commonality – Aircraft parking fees are typically charged for the use of airport sponsor owned ramp areas for transient aircraft parking. While fees may be charged for day use, most common fees are charged for overnight use. Methodology – Typically, aircraft parking fees are charged in accordance with an established schedule (i.e., aircraft within designated weight and/or size ranges pay the same fee) and a minimum fee may be specified. In the alternative, aircraft parking fees may be charged on a “cents per 1,000 pounds” approach and a minimum fee may be specified. Collection – Aircraft parking fees may be collected directly by the airport sponsor, or the airport sponsor may have an agreement with a commercial operator to collect and remit aircraft parking fees. The agreement may allow the commercial operator to retain a portion of the aircraft parking fee collected as compensation for services rendered by the commercial operator. The amount retained is often referred to as an administrative fee. D. Percentage of Gross Receipts Commonality – Over the years, a percentage of gross receipts fee has become less common. In those instances where a percentage of gross receipts is charged, fuel sales are typically exempt from inclusion, especially when fuel flowage fees are charged by the airport sponsor. In addition, other general aviation sales (e.g., aircraft sales, parts, and accessories) may also be exempt due to the product (as opposed to service) nature and the high dollar amounts typically involved. According to the Airport Development Acceleration Act (Anti-Head Tax Act) of 1973, a percentage of gross receipts cannot be charged for aircraft charter activities since such activities are subject to a ticket or segment tax. Methodology – The amount of the fee and any exceptions or exemptions is typically stipulated in the lease agreement between the airport sponsor and the commercial operator. Collection – Percentage of gross receipts fees are typically collected directly by the airport sponsor on a monthly or annual basis. 45 INDUSTRY PRACTICES General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 6 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) E. Aeronautical Permit Fees Commonality – Historically, aeronautical permit fees have not been charged by airport sponsors. However, these types of fees are becoming more common. When charged, aeronautical permit fees are typically charged on a monthly or annual basis depending on the type of aeronautical activity being conducted. Methodology – Aeronautical permit fees are typically based on a flat amount that must be paid to obtain a permit to operate a commercial business at the airport. The operating permit typically expires on an annual basis, thus requiring aeronautical permit fees to be paid annually for renewal. Collection – Aeronautical permit fees are typically collected directly by the airport sponsor on a monthly or annual basis. F. Based Aircraft Fee Commonality – Historically, based aircraft fees have not been charged by airport sponsors to based aircraft. However, more airports are beginning to consider based aircraft fees to augment landing fees if based aircraft are exempt from the landing fee. Methodology – When charged, based aircraft fees are commonly charged on a “cents per 1,000 pounds” approach (similar to landing fees). In the alternative, based aircraft fees can be charged in accordance with an established schedule (i.e., aircraft within designated weight and/or size ranges pay the same fee). Collection – Based aircraft fees may be collected directly by the airport sponsor, or the airport sponsor may have an agreement with a commercial operator to collect and remit based aircraft fees. The agreement may allow the commercial operator to retain a portion of the based aircraft fees collected as compensation for services rendered by the commercial operator. The amount retained is often referred to as an administrative fee. G. Through-the-Fence Fee Commonality – Historically, there has been significant variability in the basis and implementation of through-the-fence fees charged by airport sponsors to aeronautical users directly accessing the Airport through adjacent properties. However, in conjunction with guidance from the FAA and Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Report 114 Guidebook for Through-the-Fence Operations, more airport sponsors are reconsidering the basis and implementation of a through-the-fence fee. Methodology – When charged, through-the-fence fees can be a monthly, annual, or a payment per event, with the fee based on an appropriate rental rate if such property was located on the airport. Collection – Through-the-fence fees are typically collected directly by the airport sponsor through a through-the-fence access agreement. 46 INDUSTRY PRACTICES General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 7 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) H. Airport Access Fees Commonality – Historically, airport access fees have not been charged by airport sponsors to general aviation users. However, more airports are implementing security measures and beginning to charge airport access fees. Methodology – Typically, airport access fees are charged in accordance with an established schedule on a monthly or annual basis. Depending on the approach and infrastructure, the airport access fee may be charged for individual access (for an airport badge, gate card, keys, or other instrument) or for vehicle access (vehicle permit or other instrument). Collection – Airport access fees are typically collected directly by the airport sponsor upon issuance of the badge, gate card, keys, permit, and/or other instrument. Additionally, airport access fees are typically collected on an annual basis. 47 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 8 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) IV. SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS Consistent with the project approach, general aviation fees at comparable and competitive airports were analyzed. A. Comparable Airports The first step in identifying comparable airports is developing an accurate profile of the Airport. The profile was developed based on data available from various sources, including the FAA. The Airport profile provided the basis for establishing the criteria and parameters for identifying comparable airports. The selection of comparable airports was based on aeronautical activity and infrastructure criteria including the following: The Airport is utilized solely by the general aviation segment of the market. As such, airports with significant air carrier operations were not considered comparable. The Airport has 2 runways, one of which is 7,002 feet long. Airports with at least one runway that is 5,000 feet or longer were considered comparable. The Airport consists of 929 acres of land. Airports having total acreage between 600 and 1,350 acres were considered comparable. The Airport is classified as a Reliver airport in the FAA NPIAS. As such, only Reliver airports were considered comparable. The Airport is classified as a National airport in the FAA General Aviation Airport Asset Study. As such, only National airports were considered comparable. The Airport does have a control tower and precision approach. As such, airports with a control tower and a precision approach were considered comparable. For the 12-month period ending December 31, 2023 (as reported by the FAA Master Record 5010), general aviation itinerant operations at the Airport totaled 83,653. As such, the range for general aviation itinerant operations was established at 40,000 to 120,000. For the 12-month period ending December 31, 2023 (as reported by the FAA Master Record 5010), total operations at the Airport totaled 196,034. As such, the range for total operations was established at 90,000 to 300,000. The number of based aircraft at the Airport as of December 31, 2023 (as reported by the FAA Master Record 5010) was 420. As such, the range for based aircraft was established at 200 to 600. While a total of 10 airports were considered comparable to the Airport, rental rates and usable information from 9 airports 1 were obtained and analyzed, as shown in Table 2. 1 Relevant and useable information was not available from Kissimmee Gateway Airport (ISM). 48 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 9 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) Table 2 – Comparable Airports Summary Comparable Airports Fuel Flowage Fees Landing Fees Aircraft Parking Fees Percentage of Gross Receipts Aeronautical Permit Fees Based Aircraft Fees Through -the- Fence Airport Access Fees Denton Enterprise Airport Yes No No Yes2 Yes No No Yes Chino Airport Yes No Yes Yes Yes No N/A Yes Dallas Executive Airport3 Yes No No No No No No No Orlando Executive Airport No No No Yes Yes No No No McKinney National Airport* 3 No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes North Las Vegas Airport* Yes N/A Yes No Yes No No Yes Hillsboro Airport Yes Yes Yes No No No No No San Marcos Regional Airport Yes No Yes Yes No No No No Spirit of St. Louis Airport No No No No No No No No Tulsa Riverside Airport Yes No N/A N/A Yes No N/A N/A N/A indicates relevant and usable information was not available *Denotes sponsor operated FBO Significant findings follow (excluding the Airport): Fuel flowage fees o 6 airports charge fuel flowage fees o The fuel flowage fees range from $0.065 to $0.10 per gallon (a mean of $0.085 per gallon) Landing fees o 1 airport charges landing fees o The landing fee is $3.68 per 1,000 pounds maximum gross landed weight (MGLW) Aircraft parking fees o 5 airports charge aircraft parking fees o 1 of the 5 airports charge daily aircraft parking fees ranging from $5.00 to $10.00 per day (a mean of $7.50 per day) depending on type of aircraft Percentage of gross receipts fee o 4 airports charge percentage of gross receipts fees o The percentage of gross receipts fees rang from 1.0% to 5.5% Aeronautical permit fees o 5 airports charge aeronautical permit fees 2 Applies to FBO only 3 Identified as a competitive and comparable airport. Fees and related information will be included in the competitive and comparable airport data which is reflective of the relative proximity and aeronautical comparability. 49 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 10 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) o The aeronautical permit fees range from $50.00 to $750.00 (a mean of $325.00) Based Aircraft Fee o No pertinent information obtained Through-the-Fence Fee o No pertinent information obtained Airport access fees o 3 airports charge airport access fees o The airport access fees ranging from $25.00 to $50.00 (a mean of $38.00) B. Competitive Airports Typically, an airport is considered competitive if located in proximity to the Airport and serves a similar market. Each airport identified is then compared to the Airport based on (1) infrastructure and (2) available products, services, and facilities. For the purposes of this study, airports within 45 nautical miles of the Airport were identified as being potentially competitive airports. While a total of 9 airports were considered competitive to the Airport, general aviation fees and related information from 9 competitive airports were obtained and analyzed, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 – Competitive Airports Summary Competitive Airports Fuel Flowage Fees Landing Fees Aircraft Parking Fees Percentage of Gross Receipts Aeronautical Permit Fees Based Aircraft Fees Through -the- Fence Airport Access Fees Denton Enterprise Airport Yes No No Yes4 Yes No No Yes Addison Airport Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Arlington Municipal Airport*Yes No Yes N/A No No No No Dallas Executive Airport Yes No No No No No No No Fort Worth Meacham International Airport Yes No Yes No No No No Yes Fort Worth Spinks Airport Yes N/A Yes No No No No Yes Fort Worth Alliance Airport Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes McKinney National Airport* No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Mesquite Metro Airport* Yes No Yes No Yes No No No North Texas Regional Airport Yes N/A Yes No No No No No N/A indicates relevant and usable information was not available *Denotes sponsor operated FBO 4 Applies to FBO only 50 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 11 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) Significant findings follow (excluding the Airport): Fuel flowage fees o 8 airports charge fuel flowage fees o The fuel flowage fees rang from $0.07 to $0.35 per gallon (a mean of $0.21 per gallon) Landing fees o No pertinent information obtained Aircraft parking fees o 7 airports charge aircraft parking fees o The aircraft parking fees rang from $40.00 to $2,250 dependent upon aircraft weight Percentage of gross receipts fee o 1 airport charges a percentage of gross receipts fee. The amount is negotiated Aeronautical permit fee o 2 airports charge an aeronautical permit fee. o The aeronautical permit fees rang from $150 to $250.00 (a mean of $200.00) Based Aircraft Fee o No pertinent information obtained Through-the-Fence Fee o 2 airports charge through-the-fence fees o 1 airport charges a through-the-fence fees of $0.094 per square foot per year for commercial aviation use, $881.68 per year for recreational/incidental use and $352.00 per year for non-aeronautical use o 1 airport charges a through-the-fence fee of $650 per month for general aviation or small aircraft user Airport access fee o 5 airports charge airport access fees o The airport access fees rang from $20.00 to $40.00 (a mean of $26.50) It is important to note that airports must consider numerous factors when considering which fees to enact. These factors include but are not limited to: the financial ability of the users to pay such fees, the current political climate, the airport sponsor’s approach to business operations, as well as the goals and vision of the airport. Each airport’s unique circumstances also contribute to the amount and type of fee charged. For example, an airport that has a limited number of operations may not find it beneficial to charge landing fees. 51 RECOMMENDATIONS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 12 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) V. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Cost Center Approach Regardless of the type of general aviation fees the City ultimately decides to implement, AMCG suggests (consistent with a best practices approach) that the costs being incurred by the City relating to the planning, development, operation (including maintenance and repair), management, and marketing of the Airport that are not being covered by federal or state Airport Improvement Programs (AIP) be identified and quantified to the greatest extent possible. This would include, but would not necessarily be limited to, the capital and operating costs being incurred by the City (or portion thereof), as follows: Airport planning projects not funded through AIP, Airport development projects not funded through AIP, Airport vehicles and equipment not funded through AIP, Airport reserve accounts to provide funding for future planning and development projects and vehicles and equipment that would not be eligible for AIP funding, and all other operating costs (e.g., personnel, insurance, utilities, etc.). Once this is accomplished, general aviation revenues (including rents) should be quantified, and all capital and operating costs should be deducted which results in the cost recovery gap. Consistent with a best practices approach, the City should implement a general aviation fee program designed to close the gap between general aviation related revenues and the associated capital and operating costs. If the general aviation fees necessary to close the gap are unreasonable or not within the bounds of the market, AMCG recommends that an appropriate portion (or percentage) of the gap should be targeted (cost recovery target). B. Fees Recommended 1. Fuel Flowage Fee AMCG recommends the City continue to charge a fuel flowage fee (i.e., aviation fuel delivery fee) at the Airport and analyze existing agreements to ensure fuel flowage fee payments are correct. Generally, airport sponsors, aviation businesses, and aircraft operators believe a fuel flowage fee is an acceptable way of recovering airport costs. In comparison to other fees, fuel flowage fees are relatively easy to administer as fuel flowage fees are typically collected and remitted (or paid directly) by the fueling entity (commercial and non- commercial) to the airport sponsor. 52 RECOMMENDATIONS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 13 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) The most significant downfall with charging fuel flowage fees is that only those aircraft operators who purchase (or dispense) fuel at the airport pay the fuel flowage fee. Therefore, aircraft operators who use the airport, but do not purchase (or dispense) fuel, make no contribution to cover the airport costs through payment of fuel flowage fees. Further, fuel flowage fees are typically paid on the honor system. In most cases, fueling entities report fuel volumes without audit or there is no requirement to verify or reconcile the amount of fuel sold (or dispensed) by a fueling entity with the amount of fuel delivered. If the City continues charging a fuel flowage fee at the Airport, AMCG suggests fueling entities continue to be required to pay this fee for all gallons delivered to the fuel storage facility (as reported by the fuel supplier) as opposed to basing the fee based on gallons sold (or dispensed). AMCG recommends the City require fueling entities report all fuel purchased (by type), delivered to the fuel storage facility (by type), and sold (or dispensed) at the Airport (by type and category). This approach provides a mechanism for the City to reconcile the gallons delivered with the gallons dispensed at the Airport. Additionally, in the case of a discrepancy between the amount of fuel delivered to the fuel storage facility and the amount of fuel sold (or dispensed) at the Airport, the greater amount shall prevail and the fueling entities shall promptly pay all additional fees due the City, plus annual interest on the unpaid balance at the maximum rate allowable by law from the date originally due. 2. Landing Fee AMCG recommends the City implement a landing fee at the Airport. AMCG believes a landing fee provides the most equitable, cost-recovery, mechanism for the City and a general aviation fee program which includes a landing fee is consistent with a best practices approach. While a fuel flowage fee is only paid by those aircraft operators purchasing (or dispensing) fuel at the Airport, the landing fee is paid by all aircraft operators using the Airport. AMCG suggests the landing fee be applicable to all aircraft operators (based and transient) using the Airport. Additionally, AMCG suggests the landing fee apply to all aircraft operators based on a “cents per 1,000 pounds” of MGLW approach (with an established minimum fee) and paid on a per landing basis unless a different weight classification is agreed to in writing by the City. The City could collect landing fees directly from aircraft operators utilizing systems available to record aircraft registration numbers which, in turn, can be used to generate and send an invoice directly to the aircraft operator. 53 RECOMMENDATIONS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 14 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) 3. Percentage of Gross Receipts Fees AMCG recommends the City continue to charge a percentage of gross receipts fee in conjunction with the existing FBO lease agreement. While this fee has become less common in the industry, the advantage of charging a percentage of gross receipts fee is this provides the City with the opportunity to participate in the success of the FBO (i.e., obtain a percentage of the revenue generated) without taking any additional risk. As revenues increase, the payment to the City increases (i.e., the City participates in the upside). However, the inverse is also true in that as revenue decreases, the payment to the City decreases. This fee can also be viewed as punitive to successful business and could result in similarly situated aeronautical operators paying significantly different fees. However, the current operating environment of the Airport (i.e., one FBO) and the structure of the percentage of gross receipts fee (i.e., transient hangar and tiedown only) insulates the City and FBO from some of the downsides of the percentage of gross receipts fee. The City should conduct an annual audit of the FBO lease agreement to ensure the percentage of gross receipts fee paid by the FBO is reflective of the transient hangar and tiedown fees collected by the FBO. 4. Aeronautical Permit Fee AMCG recommends the City expand the lease development application fee by implementing an aeronautical permit fee. While the lease development application fee is applicable to any development proposal, the aeronautical permit fee is based on the type of aeronautical activity (commercial and non-commercial) being conducted at the Airport. FBOs and Specialized Aviation Service Operators (SASOs) and operators providing temporary or special activities at the Airport would be charged a commercial aeronautical permit fee for engaging in commercial aeronautical activities at the Airport. A self-fueling entity would be charged a non-commercial aeronautical permit fee for engaging in self- fueling activities at the Airport. 5. Airport Access Fees AMCG recommends the City expand the airport access fee at the Airport to include an initial fee for issuance as well as an annual renewal fee. Individuals approved for access to the Airport will be charged an airport access fee. The access fee is charged based on the issuance of a gate card or key permitting access to the airfield. 54 RECOMMENDATIONS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 15 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) C. Fees Not Recommended 1. Aircraft Parking Fees With regard to recovering the costs associated with the aircraft parking areas at the Airport, AMCG believes that the City has two primary options, as follows: The City could lease the aircraft parking areas to commercial operators and/or non-commercial tenants and charge market rent (Option 1). The City could allow transient aircraft to use aircraft parking areas and charge a transient parking fee for such use (Option 2). Based on a review of the current FBO lease agreement and historical lease practices, AMCG understands the City has implemented Option 1 for all available aircraft parking areas. As such, a separate aircraft parking fee is not necessary. 2. Based Aircraft Fee AMCG does not recommend the City implement a based aircraft fee in conjunction with the landing fee. If implemented, the based aircraft fee, applicable to all based aircraft at the Airport, would be paid on an annual basis, rather than on a per landing basis. However, given the significant variability in utilization of based aircraft, AMCG believes a landing fee program applicable to based and transient aircraft is most appropriate. 3. Through-the-Fence Fee AMCG understands through-the-fence activities are not occurring at the Airport. As such, a through-the-fence fee is not necessary. However, if the City does allow future through- the-fence access, AMCG recommends the through-the-fence access agreement and related fee are based on an appropriate rental basis for all adjacent off-Airport property with aeronautical-related access. D. Adjustment of Fees AMCG recommends the general aviation fees be reviewed annually based on the prior year’s financial statements and next year’s budget for the Airport. Any deficits should be carried forward and considered when updating the fees in the future and that any surplus be: (1) used for non-AIP funded Airport planning or development projects (including capital expenditures relating to non-AIP funded Airport improvements, vehicles, and equipment), (2) set aside in reserve accounts for future non-AIP funded planning or development projects, or (3) carried forward for consideration in establishing fees for the following period. 55 RECOMMENDATIONS General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 16 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) Also, and equally important, general aviation fees should not be imbedded in future lease agreements with commercial operators or non-commercial tenants. Conversely, general aviation fees should be established in a separate general aviation fee schedule. AMCG suggests a provision be included in all applicable lease agreements and lease amendments to the effect of: “To recover the costs being incurred by the City relating to the planning, development, operation (including maintenance and repair), management, and marketing of the Airport (that are not being covered by federal or state AIP funds), the lessee agrees to pay the aeronautical-related fees set forth in the Airport’s General Aviation Fee Schedule.” If it is necessary to include general aviation fees in a lease agreement, language should be included in the lease agreement stipulating that the City may, at the City’s discretion, adjust general aviation fees from time to time and the lessee agrees to pay such general aviation fees to help recover the costs incurred by the City relating to the planning, development, operation (including maintenance and repair), management, and marketing of the Airport (that are not being covered by federal or state AIP funds). 56 FEE CALCULATION General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 17 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) VI. FEES CALCULATION A. Fees Selected To be completed in Phase II. B. Financial Analysis To be completed in Phase II. C. Establishment of Fees To be completed in Phase II. 1. Fee Calculation Analysis To be completed in Phase II. 2. Projected General Aviation Fee Revenue To be completed in Phase II. 57 GENERAL AVIATION FEE SCHEDULE General Aviation Fee Study (Phase I) 18 City of Denton, Denton Enterprise Airport (05/24/2024) VII. GENERAL AVIATION FEE SCHEDULE To be completed in Phase II. 58 Date: June 7, 2024 Report No. 2024-21 INFORMAL STAFF REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Denton Central Appraisal District (DCAD) 2025 Proposed Budget BACKGROUND: The Finance Department has received notice of a public hearing on the 2025 Denton Central Appraisal District (DCAD) Proposed Budget. A copy of the notice is attached for your review. There will be a public hearing on the proposed budget on June 13, 2024, at 3 p.m. at 3901 Morse Street, Denton, TX. The public hearing notice will be published not later than 10 days before the date of the hearing in accordance with the TPTC Sec. 6.062(a). If any entity wishes to disapprove the budget, they must do so within 30 days of adoption by resolution filed with the secretary of the Denton CAD board of directors in accordance with TPTC Sec. 6.06(a). If Council would like to take action on the proposed DCAD budget, staff needs to be notified by Tuesday, June 11th to add to the City Council June 18th agenda. The total 2025 DCAD Proposed Budget is $23,821,641.63, an increase of $3,473,839.90 from last year’s budget of $20,347,801.73. STAFF CONTACT: Jessica Williams, Chief Financial Officer Jessica.JWilliams@cityofdenton.com REQUESTOR: Staff initiated. PARTICIPATING DEPARTMENTS: Finance Department STAFF TIME TO COMPLETE REPORT: 1 hour 59 Denton Central Appraisal District 2025 Proposed Budget 60 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 2025 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS PUBLIC NOTICES AND TRANSMITTAL LETTER TRANSMITTAL LETTER PAGE 1 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PAGE 2 2025 BUDGET SUMMARY 2024 & 2025 COMPARISON PAGE 3 GRAPH OF 2025 BUDGET PAGE 4 2025 REVENUE SUMMARY PAGE 5 2025 ESTIMATED BUDGET ALLOCATIONS PAGE 6 - 8 2025 BUDGET SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT PAGE 9 2025 BUDGET SUMMARY, TOP LEVEL PAGE 10 2025 BUDGET SUMMARY BY CATEGORY PAGE 11 - 18 2025 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART PAGE 19 2025 FTE POSITIONS AND COUNT PAGE 20 - 21 2025 CAPITAL EXPENSES PAGE 22 - 23 61 TO: Denton County Taxing Entities, Denton CAD Board of Directors FROM: Don Spencer, Chief Appraiser DATE: June 13, 2024 SUBJECT: Proposed 2025 Budget I am pleased to present the proposed budget for the Denton Central Appraisal District (DCAD) for the fiscal year 2025. Facing the same growth challenges in Denton County that you all are managing, DCAD seeks innovative solutions to keep pace with the demands and be as conservative as possible. The fiscal year 2025 proposed budget totals $23,821,641.63, funding operations and increasing staffing from 115 to 125. The preparation of this proposed budget could not have been accomplished without the dedication of the entire DCAD leadership team. I would like to express my appreciation for all of their diligence. As a matter of general practice, we have taken a close look at expenses in comparison to budget to ensure sufficient funds across all departments and for all services. The exponential growth in Denton County continues to create more challenges in providing the expected level of service to the citizens and entities. Also, with the population and parcel count continuing to rise, the need for personnel here at the district is critical for our organization to comply with the statutory requirements set forth by the property tax code. It is important to note, while this is a substantial increase, we are still considerably understaffed. We also still have not addressed the facility needs. These are two considerations that will be a recurring subject of discussion for the next several years until we are able to obtain the space and personnel to adequately support operations and the level of service that is expected from us as an organization. Should you have any questions prior to our public hearing, please let me know. I look forward to continuing to work with you all. We appreciate your continued partnership with Denton CAD and your support. Don Spencer Chief Appraiser Denton Central Appraisal District Page 1 Notice Of Public Hearing On Denton Central Appraisal District 2025 Budget The Denton Central Appraisal District will hold a public hearing on a proposed budget for the 2025 fiscal year. The public hearing will be held on June 13, 2024 at 3:00 P.M. at 3901 Morse Street, Denton, Texas. A summary of the appraisal district budget follows: The total amount of the proposed budget.$23,821,641.63 The total amount of increase over the current year's budget.$3,473,839.90 The number of employees compensated under the proposed budget.125 The number of employees compensated under the current budget.115 The appraisal district is supported solely by payments from the local taxing units served by the appraisal district. If approved by the appraisal district board of directors at the public hearing, this proposed budget will take effect automatically unless disapproved by the governing bodies of the county, school districts, cities and towns served by the appraisal district. A copy of the proposed budget is available for public inspection in the office of each of those governing bodies. A copy is also available for public inspection at the appraisal district office. Ann Pomykal Secretary of the Board of Directors Denton Central Appraisal District 3911 Morse Street Denton, Texas 76208 (940) 349-3800 Page 2 2024 2025 AMOUNT PERCENT ACCT #ACCOUNT TITLE BUDGET BUDGET CHANGE CHANGE 5100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 5110 SALARIES $9,906,250.00 $11,224,450.00 $1,318,200.00 13.31% 5120 LONGEVITY PAY $78,870.00 $87,775.00 $8,905.00 11.29% 5130 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA)$815,659.84 $921,214.92 $105,555.08 12.94% 5140 RETIREMENT (TCDRS)$1,404,755.10 $1,587,724.15 $182,969.05 13.02% 5150 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE $72,559.78 $82,330.63 $9,770.85 13.47% 5160 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE $1,886,580.00 $2,188,000.00 $301,420.00 15.98% TOTAL 5100 - PERSONNEL SERVICES $14,164,674.72 $16,091,494.72 $1,926,819.98 13.60% 5200 EDUCATION & TRAINING 5210 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES $35,000.00 $38,130.00 $3,130.00 8.94% 5220 TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL $162,500.00 $223,000.00 $60,500.00 37.23% TOTAL 5200 - EDUCATION & TRAINING $197,500.00 $261,130.00 $63,630.00 32.22% 5300 SERVICES RECEIVED 5310 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD $451,290.00 $495,630.00 $44,340.00 9.83% 5315 OIL, GAS, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, AND UTILITY VALUATION $190,000.00 $200,000.00 $10,000.00 5.26% 5325 LEGAL SERVICES $500,000.00 $650,000.00 $150,000.00 30.00% 5330 AUDIT & PAYROLL PROCESSING $62,500.00 $55,000.00 ($7,500.00)-12.00% 5340 SUBSCRIPTIONS & CONTRACTS $1,026,500.00 $1,076,122.00 $49,622.00 4.83% 5345 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT $683,448.50 $765,293.50 $81,845.00 11.98% 5350 GENERAL INSURANCE $45,626.59 $55,785.26 $10,158.67 22.26% 5360 PRINTING SERVICE $229,400.00 $215,800.00 ($13,600.00)-5.93% 5370 POSTAGE & FREIGHT $452,800.00 $423,000.00 ($29,800.00)-6.58% 5380 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING $8,700.00 $10,500.00 $1,800.00 20.69% 5390 OFFICE SUPPLIES $79,300.00 $64,855.00 ($14,445.00)-18.22% TOTAL 5300 - SERVICES RECEIVED $3,729,565.09 $4,011,985.76 $238,080.67 7.57% 5400 UTILITIES & MAINTENANCE 5410 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $17,400.00 $17,700.00 $300.00 1.72% 5420 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MAINTENANCE $1,329,665.00 $2,182,995.00 $853,330.00 64.18% 5430 ELECTRICITY, WATER, SEWER, & SOLID WASTE $81,340.00 $85,407.00 $4,067.00 5.00% 5440 TELEPHONE $110,656.00 $113,580.00 $2,924.00 2.64% 5450 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE $163,465.00 $163,925.00 $460.00 0.28% TOTAL 5400 - UTILITIES & MAINTENANCE $1,702,526.00 $2,563,607.00 $861,081.00 50.58% 5500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 5510 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT $93,150.00 $84,850.00 ($8,300.00)-8.91% 5520 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 0.00% TOTAL 5500 - CAPITAL OUTLAY $93,150.00 $334,850.00 $241,700.00 259.47% 5600 MISCELLANEOUS 5610 CONTINGENCY $89,271.00 $101,739.00 $12,468.00 13.97% 5620 MISCELLANEOUS $64,760.00 $73,360.00 $8,600.00 5630 SEASONAL LABOR $245,000.00 $280,000.00 $35,000.00 14.29% TOTAL 5600 - MISCELLANEOUS $399,031.00 $455,099.00 $56,068.00 14.05% 5900 DEBT SERVICE 5920 EQUIPMENT PAYMENTS $61,354.92 $103,475.16 $42,120.24 68.65% TOTAL 5900 - DEBT SERVICE $61,354.92 $103,475.16 $42,120.24 68.65% TOTAL ALL DEPARTMENTS: $20,347,801.73 $23,821,641.63 $3,473,839.90 17.07% 2024 - 2025 BUDGET COMPARISON Page 3 2025 DCAD BUDGET Personnel Services $16,091,494.71 Education & Training $261,130.00 Services Received $4,011,985.76 Utilitites & Maintenance $2,563,607.00 Capital Outlay $334,850.00 Miscellaneous $455,099.00 Debt Service $103,475.16 Page 4 SUMMARY OF 2025 REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE 2024 REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET 2024 2025 CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET REVENUES:10 new FTE'S FUNDING FROM JURISDICTIONS $19,617,801.73 $22,055,514.09 12.43% DCAD DESIGNATED FUND $500,000.00 $1,561,127.54 INTEREST INCOME $180,000.00 $200,000.00 OTHER SERVICES $25,000.00 $1,000.00 MISCELLANOUS INCOME $25,000.00 $4,000.00 TOTAL REVENUES $20,347,801.73 $23,821,641.63 EXPENSES: TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENSES $20,347,801.73 $23,821,641.63 TOTAL BUDGET $20,347,801.73 $23,821,641.63 17.07% 2024 2025 +/-+/- YEAR YEAR CHANGE PERCENTAGE ACCOUNTS 486,980 501,589 14,609 3.00% BUDGET $20,347,801.73 $23,821,641.63 $3,473,839.90 17.07% COST PER PARCEL $41.78 $47.49 $5.71 13.66% Page 5 % OF 2025 EST. 2023 TOTAL BUDGET JURISDICTIONS TAX LEVY LEVIES ALLOCATIONS 22,055,514.09$ SCHOOL DISTRICTS: S01 ARGYLE ISD 60,114,589.31 2.0131%$444,006.03 S02 AUBREY ISD 34,321,369.54 1.1494%$253,497.45 S03 CARROLLTON-FB ISD 59,321,215.50 1.9866%$438,146.17 S04 CELINA ISD 3,146,365.81 0.1054%$23,239.04 S05 DENTON ISD 363,897,514.29 12.1863%$2,687,745.05 S06 FRISCO ISD 185,710,323.80 6.2191%$1,371,655.44 S07 KRUM ISD 22,973,409.13 0.7693%$169,681.47 S08 LAKE DALLAS ISD 38,574,582.69 1.2918%$284,911.66 S09 LEWISVILLE ISD 640,496,706.05 21.4491%$4,730,705.17 S10 LITTLE ELM ISD 99,672,541.66 3.3379%$736,180.85 S11 NORTHWEST ISD 211,182,352.68 7.0721%$1,559,791.70 S12 PILOT POINT ISD 12,242,011.09 0.4100%$90,419.43 S13 PONDER ISD 16,192,375.42 0.5423%$119,596.80 S14 SANGER ISD 25,430,897.51 0.8516%$187,832.47 S15 ERA ISD 1,316.27 0.0000%$9.72 S16 SLIDELL ISD 752,781.09 0.0252%$5,560.04 S17 PROSPER ISD 44,883,909.88 1.5031%$331,512.31 SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTALS 1,818,914,261.72 60.9122%$13,434,490.80 G01 DENTON COUNTY 332,669,895.73 11.1405%$2,457,098.03 DENTON CAD 2025 ESTIMATED BUDGET ALLOCATIONS The 2025 proposed budget allocations are estimated amounts. 2023 Certified levies are used for calculation purposes. Please be aware that allocations will change for each entity based on the increases/decreases to their 2024 actual levies upon certification. Based on 2023 Certified Levy. Uses $1,561,127.54 from Reserves. Page 6 % OF 2025 EST. 2023 TOTAL BUDGET JURISDICTIONS TAX LEVY LEVIES ALLOCATIONS 22,055,514.09$ CITIES: C26 TOWN OF ARGYLE 4,743,192.10 0.1588%$35,033.19 C01 CITY OF AUBREY 4,743,753.36 0.1589%$35,037.34 C31 TOWN OF BARTONVILLE 1,098,332.46 0.0368%$8,112.28 C02 CITY OF CARROLLTON 66,820,813.21 2.2377%$493,538.16 C49 CITY OF CELINA 5,780,996.55 0.1936%$42,698.41 C03 CITY OF THE COLONY 49,370,888.63 1.6533%$364,653.11 C21 TOWN OF COPPELL 1,189,865.11 0.0398%$8,788.34 C27 TOWN OF COPPER CANYON 1,486,063.82 0.0498%$10,976.06 C04 CITY OF CORINTH 17,538,879.40 0.5873%$129,542.07 C20 CITY OF DALLAS 17,277,441.44 0.5786%$127,611.09 C05 CITY OF DENTON 107,856,823.32 3.6119%$796,629.91 C42 TOWN OF DISH 214,089.77 0.0072%$1,581.27 C30 TOWN OF DOUBLE OAK 1,236,380.77 0.0414%$9,131.90 C47 TOWN OF CORRAL CITY 19,122.17 0.0006%$141.24 C07 TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND 59,647,226.67 1.9975%$440,554.09 C36 CITY OF FORT WORTH 43,511,254.84 1.4571%$321,373.89 C32 CITY OF FRISCO 77,125,010.53 2.5828%$569,644.91 C39 CITY OF GRAPEVINE 353.40 0.0000%$2.61 C22 TOWN OF HACKBERRY 215,931.00 0.0072%$1,594.87 C38 CITY OF HASLET 4,273.59 0.0001%$31.56 C19 TOWN OF HICKORY CREEK 2,513,775.76 0.0842%$18,566.73 C08 CITY OF HIGHLAND VILLAGE 16,016,996.76 0.5364%$118,301.45 C09 CITY OF JUSTIN 6,157,278.77 0.2062%$45,477.63 C18 CITY OF KRUGERVILLE 1,306,852.91 0.0438%$9,652.41 C10 CITY OF KRUM 4,569,621.33 0.1530%$33,751.20 C11 CITY OF LAKE DALLAS 4,221,993.88 0.1414%$31,183.62 C25 CITY OF LAKEWOOD VILLAGE 676,945.12 0.0227%$4,999.91 C12 CITY OF LEWISVILLE 87,690,250.13 2.9366%$647,679.71 C13 TOWN OF LITTLE ELM 45,921,404.02 1.5378%$339,175.24 C45 CITY OF NEW FAIRVIEW 57,369.53 0.0019%$423.73 C33 TOWN OF NORTHLAKE 8,206,500.28 0.2748%$60,613.17 C24 CITY OF OAK POINT 4,480,417.82 0.1500%$33,092.34 C14 CITY OF PILOT POINT 4,286,872.10 0.1436%$31,662.81 C29 CITY OF PLANO 7,098,097.71 0.2377%$52,426.51 C15 TOWN OF PONDER 2,180,652.92 0.0730%$16,106.29 C48 CITY OF PROSPER 12,225,453.38 0.4094%$90,297.13 C51 TOWN OF PROVIDENCE VILLAGE 5,459,672.92 0.1828%$40,325.11 C17 CITY OF ROANOKE 11,368,927.41 0.3807%$83,970.84 C16 CITY OF SANGER 8,914,071.23 0.2985%$65,839.28 C34 TOWN OF SHADY SHORES 1,555,153.67 0.0521%$11,486.36 C37 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 824,974.30 0.0276%$6,093.26 C28 CITY OF TROPHY CLUB 11,354,591.12 0.3802%$83,864.95 C44 CITY OF WESTLAKE 220,870.82 0.0074%$1,631.35 CITIES TOTALS 707,189,436.03 23.6825%$5,223,297.33 Page 7 % OF 2025 EST. 2023 TOTAL BUDGET JURISDICTIONS TAX LEVY LEVIES ALLOCATIONS 22,055,514.09$ SPECIAL DISTRICTS: ESD1 DENTON CO EMER SER DIST 6,683,988.44 0.2238%$49,367.90 ESD2 TROPHY CLUB PID #1 EM SER 535,309.66 0.0179%$3,953.79 W04 CLEARCREEK WATERSHED AUTH 411,579.51 0.0138%$3,039.92 L01 DEN CO LEVY IMPR DIST #1 1,456,855.16 0.0488%$10,760.32 MMD1 HIGHWAY 380 MUN MAN DIST 6,029,548.02 0.2019%$44,534.21 MMD3 NORTHLAKE MUN. MAN. DIST. #1 4,816,770.51 0.1613%$35,576.64 MMD4 NORTHLAKE MUN. MAN. DIST. #2 1,540,478.08 0.0516%$11,377.96 PID7 NORTHLAKE PID NO 1 0.00 0.0000%$0.00 W03 TROPHY CLUB MUD #1 1,198,144.43 0.0401%$8,849.49 W13 DCFWSD #6 7,934,854.48 0.2657%$58,606.79 W17 ELM RIDGE WCID OF DENTON CO 21,274,707.17 0.7125%$157,134.87 W18 DCFWSD #8A 2,952,960.57 0.0989%$21,810.55 W19 DCFWSD #8B 1,785,025.99 0.0598%$13,184.19 W20 DCFWSD #11A 5,447,931.44 0.1824%$40,238.39 W21 DCFWSD #7 8,525,503.08 0.2855%$62,969.32 W22 DENTON CO MUD #4 1,607,865.26 0.0538%$11,875.68 W23 DENTON CO MUD #5 1,513,241.48 0.0507%$11,176.79 W24 FRISCO WEST WCID 5,186,852.56 0.1737%$38,310.06 W25 DCFWSD #11B 3,786,858.75 0.1268%$27,969.72 W26 DCFWSD #4A 485,279.10 0.0163%$3,584.27 W27 OAK POINT WATER CONT. #1 786,035.91 0.0263%$5,805.66 W28 OAK POINT WATER CONT. #2 529,365.12 0.0177%$3,909.89 W29 OAK POINT WATER CONT. #3 713,192.62 0.0239%$5,267.64 W30 SMILEY RD WCID #1 1,842,309.56 0.0617%$13,607.29 W32 DCFWSD #11C 1,621,215.29 0.0543%$11,974.29 W33 NORTH FT WORTH WCID NO 1 87,724.84 0.0029%$647.94 W37 BROOKFIELD WCID 1,499,837.08 0.0502%$11,077.79 W38 ALPHA RANCH FWSD NO 1 1,008,757.35 0.0338%$7,450.68 W39 BELMONT FWSD NO 1 8,554,497.87 0.2865%$63,183.47 W41 THE LAKES FWSD 8,999,108.96 0.3014%$66,467.37 W42 CANYON FALLS WCID #2 3,293,353.44 0.1103%$24,324.69 W43 OAK POINT WATER CONT. #4 1,143,306.42 0.0383%$8,444.45 W44 CANYON FALLS MUD NO 1 1,595,136.71 0.0534%$11,781.67 W45 BELMONT FWSD NO 2 2,120,387.79 0.0710%$15,661.17 W47 DENTON CO MUD #6 5,704,079.07 0.1910%$42,130.30 W48 FAR NORTH FT WORTH MUD NO 1 0.00 0.0000%$0.00 W49 DENTON CO MUD #9 721,862.03 0.0242%$5,331.67 W54 DENTON CO MUD #10 0.00 0.0000%$0.00 W55 BIG SKY MUD 1,201,700.31 0.0402%$8,875.75 W57 DENTON CO MUD NO 8 900,590.70 0.0302%$6,651.76 W59 TRADITION MUD DENTON CO NO 2B 1,691,058.71 0.0566%$12,490.15 W66 TALLEY RANCH WCID NO 1 23,328.07 0.0008%$172.30 W67 PRAIRIE OAKS MUD OF DENTON CO 140,906.34 0.0047%$1,040.73 W68 DENTON CO MUD NO 16 1,407.00 0.0000%$10.39 SPECIAL DISTRICTS TOTALS 127,352,914.88 4.2648%$940,627.91 GRAND TOTALS 2,986,126,508.36 100.0000%$22,055,514.09 Page 8 2025 BUDGET SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT TOTAL DEPT #100 DEPT #101 DEPT #102 DEPT #103 DEPT #104 DEPT #105 DEPT #106 DEPT #201 DEPT #202 DEPT #203 DEPT #204 2025 ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE BUSINESS OPER ADMINISTRATION EXEMP & ASSIS MAPPING INFO TECHNOLOGY OVERHEAD TRAIN & DEVEL COMMERCIAL APPEALS PERSONAL PROP RESIDENTIAL BUDGET 5100 PERSONNEL SERVICES 5110 SALARIES $467,250.00 $738,500.00 $1,533,550.00 $902,000.00 $972,300.00 $234,500.00 $125,000.00 $1,163,000.00 $553,350.00 $1,052,000.00 $3,483,000.00 $11,224,450.00 5120 LONGEVITY PAY $6,620.00 $2,560.00 $4,520.00 $10,910.00 $8,670.00 $0.00 $120.00 $8,350.00 $6,700.00 $12,235.00 $27,090.00 $87,775.00 5130 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA)$37,524.78 $59,659.29 $118,086.93 $70,262.19 $75,468.78 $17,939.25 $7,663.01 $98,099.78 $43,268.40 $90,754.63 $302,487.89 $921,214.93 5140 RETIREMENT (TCDRS)$63,046.10 $101,381.80 $200,670.60 $119,399.80 $128,247.60 $53,467.40 $13,022.10 $166,705.50 $73,528.00 $154,223.55 $514,031.70 $1,587,724.15 5150 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE $5,683.42 $3,197.43 $6,328.84 $3,765.69 $4,044.73 $1,500.80 $410.49 $10,595.25 $2,344.49 $10,058.91 $34,400.58 $82,330.63 5160 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,188,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,188,000.00 TOTAL 5100 - PERSONNEL SERVICES $580,124.30 $905,298.52 $1,863,156.37 $1,106,337.68 $1,188,731.11 $2,495,407.45 $146,215.60 $1,446,750.53 $679,190.89 $1,319,272.09 $4,361,010.17 $16,091,494.71 5200 EDUCATION & TRAINING 5210 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $38,130.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $38,130.00 5220 TRAINING, SCHOOLS, CONF, AND TRAVEL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $223,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $223,000.00 TOTAL 5200 - EDUCATION & TRAINING $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $261,130.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $261,130.00 5300 SERVICES RECEIVED 5310 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $495,630.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $495,630.00 5315 OIL, GAS, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, AND UTILITY VALUATION $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200,000.00 5325 LEGAL SERVICES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $650,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $650,000.00 5330 AUDIT & PAYROLL PROCESSING $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $55,000.00 5340 SUBSCRIPTIONS & CONTRACTS $0.00 $0.00 $179,185.00 $115,500.00 $0.00 $483,100.00 $0.00 $223,691.00 $3,600.00 $8,480.00 $62,566.00 $1,076,122.00 5345 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT $16,650.00 $38,850.00 $8,914.00 $6,427.50 $5,550.00 $0.00 $5,550.00 $111,000.00 $5,550.00 $122,802.00 $444,000.00 $765,293.50 5350 GENERAL INSURANCE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $55,785.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $55,785.26 5360 PRINTING SERVICE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $215,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $215,800.00 5370 POSTAGE & FREIGHT $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $423,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $423,000.00 5380 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,500.00 5390 OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64,855.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64,855.00 TOTAL 5300 - SERVICES RECEIVED $16,650.00 $38,850.00 $188,099.00 $121,927.50 $5,550.00 $2,653,670.26 $5,550.00 $334,691.00 $9,150.00 $131,282.00 $506,566.00 $4,011,985.76 5400 UTILITIES & MAINTENANCE 5410 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,700.00 5420 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MAINTENANCE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,182,995.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,182,995.00 5430 ELECTRICITY, WATER, SEWER, & SOLID WASTE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $85,407.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $85,407.00 5440 TELEPHONE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $113,580.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $113,580.00 5450 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $163,925.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $163,925.00 TOTAL 5400 - UTILITIES & MAINTENANCE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,182,995.00 $380,612.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,563,607.00 5500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 5510 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $10,750.00 $8,300.00 $7,300.00 $14,000.00 $1,500.00 $7,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $18,000.00 $84,850.00 5520 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $250,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $250,000.00 TOTAL 5500 - CAPITAL OUTLAY $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $10,750.00 $8,300.00 $7,300.00 $264,000.00 $1,500.00 $7,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $18,000.00 $334,850.00 5600 MISCELLANEOUS 5610 CONTINGENCY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $101,739.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $101,739.00 5620 MISCELLANEOUS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $73,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $73,360.00 5630 SEASONAL LABOR $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $280,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $280,000.00 TOTAL 5600 - MISCELLANEOUS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $455,099.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $455,099.00 5910 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 5920 EQUIPMENT PAYMENTS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,475.16 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,475.16 TOTAL 5900 - DEBT SERVICE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,475.16 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,475.16 TOTALS:$598,274.30 $948,648.52 $2,062,005.37 $1,236,565.18 $3,384,576.11 $6,613,393.87 $153,265.60 $1,788,441.53 $694,340.89 $1,456,554.09 $4,885,576.17 $23,821,641.63 Page 9 2024 2025 INCREASE/ BUDGET % Total BUDGET % Total DECREASE % Total PERSONNEL SERVICES $14,164,674.72 70%$16,091,494.71 68%$1,926,819.99 55% OTHER $6,183,127.01 30%$7,730,146.92 32%$1,547,019.91 45% TOTAL BUDGET $20,347,801.73 $23,821,641.63 $3,473,839.90 GENERAL SUMMARY Page 10 2025 BUDGET 5100 - PERSONNEL SERVICES 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5110 - SALARIES $9,906,250.00 $11,224,450.00 $1,318,200.00 FULL-TIME SALARIES & SALARY ADJUSTMENTS $11,224,450.00 TOTAL ACCOUNT #5110 $11,224,450.00 ACCT #5120 - LONGEVITY PAY $78,870.00 $87,775.00 $8,905.00 DCAD RECOGNIZES CONTINUED SERVICE WITH LONGEVITY PAY. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5120 $87,775.00 ACCT #5130 - SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA)$815,659.84 $921,214.92 $105,555.08 SOCIAL SECURITY IS CALCULATED ON FULL TIME SALARIES AND LONGEVITY. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5130 $921,214.92 ACCT #5140 - RETIREMENT (TCDRS)$1,404,755.10 $1,587,724.15 $182,969.05 RETIREMENT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5140 $1,587,724.15 ACCT #5150 - WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE $72,559.79 $82,330.63 $9,770.84 THE DISTRICT PAYS WORKERS' COMPENSATION PREMIUMS ON ALL FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5150 $82,330.63 ACCT #5160 - GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE $1,886,580.00 $2,188,000.00 $301,420.00 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE IS PROVIDED TO ALL FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5160 $2,188,000.00 TOTAL 5100 - PERSONNEL SERVICES $14,164,674.73 $16,091,494.72 $1,926,819.97 Page 11 2025 BUDGET 5200 - EDUCATION & TRAINING 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5210 - MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSC & DUES $35,000.00 $38,130.00 $3,130.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL MEMBERSHIPS AND DUES, AND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO EDUCATIONAL MEDIA. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5210 $38,130.00 ACCT #5220 - TRAINING - SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES & TRAVEL $162,500.00 $223,000.00 $60,500.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL EDUCATIONAL RELATED TRAINING AND TRAVEL. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5220 $223,000.00 TOTAL 5200 - EDUCATION & TRAINING $197,500.00 $261,130.00 $63,630.00 Page 12 2025 BUDGET 5300 - SERVICES RECEIVED 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5310 - APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD $451,290.00 $495,630.00 $44,340.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR PAYMENTS TO THE 42 MEMBER ARB PANEL FOR WORK PERFORMED DURING THE MANDATED EQUALIZATION PROCESS. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5310 $495,630.00 ACCT #5315 - OIL, GAS, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, AND UTILITY VALUATION $190,000.00 $200,000.00 $10,000.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS FOR CONTRACTED SERVICES. IT IS A BID ITEM. THIS ACCOUNT WAS MOVED TO OVERHEAD IN 2023. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5315 $200,000.00 ACCT #5325 - LEGAL SERVICES $500,000.00 $650,000.00 $150,000.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR ALL LEGAL EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH DEFENDING VALUES. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5325 $650,000.00 ACCT #5330 - AUDIT & PAYROLL PROCESSING $62,500.00 $55,000.00 ($7,500.00) THIS BUDGET ITEM IS FOR THE ANNUAL AUDIT AND FOR PAYROLL PROCESSING.THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5330 $55,000.00 ACCT #5340 - SUBSCRIPTIONS & CONTRACTS $1,026,500.00 $1,076,122.00 $49,622.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS CHARGED FOR EXPENSES INCURRED TO OBTAIN OWNERSHIP, SALES AND VALUE INFORMATION. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5340 $1,076,122.00 ACCT #5345 - AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT $683,448.50 $765,293.50 $81,845.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR THE USE OF THEIR PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR JOB DUTIES. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5345 $765,293.50 Page 13 2025 BUDGET 5300 - SERVICES RECEIVED (continued) 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5350 - GENERAL INSURANCE $45,626.59 $55,785.26 $10,158.67 ALL INSURANCE EXCEPT GROUP HEALTH AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION IS CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5350 $55,785.26 ACCT #5360 - PRINTING SERVICES $229,400.00 $215,800.00 ($13,600.00) THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL ITEMS THAT ARE PRINTED AND MAILED. ITEMS THAT ARE PRINTED AND CONSUMED WITHIN THE BUILDING ARE CHARGED TO OFFICE SUPPLIES. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5360 $215,800.00 ACCT #5370 - POSTAGE AND FREIGHT $452,800.00 $423,000.00 ($29,800.00) THIS ITEM IS CHARGED FOR ALL ITEMS THAT ARE MAILED. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5370 $423,000.00 ACCT #5380 - LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING $8,700.00 $10,500.00 $1,800.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ADVERTISEMENTS IN NEWSPAPERS CONCERNING EXEMPTION MATTERS SUCH AS HOMESTEADS, OVER-65, DISABLED VETERANS, AND PRODUCTIVITY VALUATION MATTERS. OTHER ADVERTISEMENTS HAVE TO DO WITH APPRAISAL REVIEW NOTICES, MISCELLANEOUS, CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING, AND INVITATIONS TO BID. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. SB 622 requires a line item indicating expenditures for notices required by law to be published in a newspaper by the political subdivision. 2022 Actual Expenses for mandated notices is $5,998 2023 Budgeted Expenses for mandated notices is $7,500 TOTAL ACCOUNT #5380 $10,500.00 ACCT #5390 - OFFICE SUPPLIES $79,300.00 $64,855.00 ($14,445.00) THE OFFICE SUPPLY BUDGET IS COMPRISED OF EXPENSES INCURRED FOR TRADITIONAL OFFICE SUPPLY ITEMS. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5390 $64,855.00 TOTAL 5300 - SERVICES RECEIVED $3,729,565.09 $4,011,985.76 $282,420.67 Page 14 ` 2025 BUDGET 5400 - UTILITIES AND MAINTENANCE 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5410 - OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $17,400.00 $17,700.00 $300.00 MAINTENANCE OF ALL OFFICE EQUIPMENT EXCEPT THE PRIMARY COMPUTER, PERIPHERAL DEVICES, AND PERSONAL COMPUTERS IS CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5410 $17,700.00 ACCT #5420 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MAINTENANCE $1,329,665.00 $2,182,995.00 $853,330.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS COMPRISED OF BOTH COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE TO THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT. GIS RELATED EXPENSES ARE INCLUDED HERE. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5420 $2,182,995.00 ACCT #5430 - ELECTRICITY, WATER, SEWER AND SOLID WASTE $81,340.00 $85,407.00 $4,067.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS FOR THE DISTRICT'S UTILITIES. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5430 $85,407.00 ACCT #5440 - TELEPHONE $110,656.00 $113,580.00 $2,924.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM IS FOR THE DISTRICT'S TELEPHONE EXPENSE. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5440 $113,580.00 ACCT #5450 - BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE $163,465.00 $163,925.00 $460.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM COMPRISES ALL BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5450 $163,925.00 TOTAL 5400 - UTILITIES AND MAINTENANCE $1,702,526.00 $2,563,607.00 $861,081.00 Page 15 2025 BUDGET 5500 - CAPITAL OUTLAY 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5510 - FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT $93,150.00 $84,850.00 ($8,300.00) AN ASSET SCHEDULE APPEARS AT THE BACK OF THE BUDGET. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5510 $84,850.00 ACCT #5520 - BUILDING AND LAND IMPROVEMENTS $0.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 AN ASSET SCHEDULE APPEARS AT THE BACK OF THE BUDGET. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5520 $250,000.00 TOTAL 5500 - CAPITAL OUTLAY $93,150.00 $334,850.00 $241,700.00 Page 16 2025 BUDGET 5600 - MISCELLANEOUS 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5610 - CONTINGENCY $89,271.00 $101,739.00 $12,468.00 THE FUNDS IN THIS BUDGET ITEM ARE APPROPRIATED FOR UNANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES. ALL ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES ARE BUDGETED IN SPECIFIC ACCOUNTS. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. TOTAL ACCOUNT #5610 $101,739.00 ACCT #5620 - MISCELLANEOUS $64,760.00 $73,360.00 $8,600.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS FOR ITEMS THAT WILL NOT FIT WELL IN ANOTHER CATEGORY. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. $73,360.00 ACCT #5630 - SEASONAL LABOR $245,000.00 $280,000.00 $35,000.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS FOR SEASONAL LABOR COSTS. THE DISTRICT BEGAN USING CONTRACT EMPLOYEES IN 2020 WHEN THEY STOPPED USING PART TIME EMPLOYEES. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT. $280,000.00 TOTAL ACCOUNT #5630 TOTAL 5600 - MISCELLANEOUS $399,031.00 $455,099.00 $56,068.00 Page 17 2025 BUDGET 5900 - DEBT SERVICE 2024 2025 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT #5920 - EQUIPMENT PAYMENTS $61,354.92 $103,475.16 $42,120.24 THIS ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR EQUIPMENT LEASE PAYMENTS. EQUIPMENT LEASES WERE MOVED TO SUBSCRIPTIONS & CONTRACTS IN 2022. THIS ACCOUNT IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO THE OVERHEAD DEPARTMENT.$103,475.16 TOTAL ACCOUNT #5920 TOTAL 5900 - DEBT SERVICE $61,354.92 $103,475.16 $42,120.24 TOTAL BUDGET $20,347,801.74 $23,821,641.63 $3,473,839.89 Page 18 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Fiscal Year 2025 125 FTE's Denton County Taxpayers Denton County Taxing Entities Denton CAD Board of Directors Taxpayer Liaison Officer (2)Chief Appraiser Appraisal Review Board Appraisal Services (77)Support Services (47) Deputy Chief of Appraisal Deputy Chief of Administration Director of Business Personal Property Appraisal Director of Commercial Appraisal Director of Residential Appraisal Director of GIS/Mapping Director of Training and Development Director of Human Resources Director of Exemptions & Assistance Director of Information Technology Director of Appeals Director of Business Operations Supervisor (1) Supervisor (1) Supervisor (4) Supervisor (1)HR Assistant (1) Supervisor (1) Supervisor (2) ARB Coord. (1) Finance Asst. (1) Senior Appraiser (2) Senior Appraiser (2) Senior Appraiser (4) GIS Specialist (2)Senior Ex. Spec.(1) System Admin. (1) Legal Specialist (1) Exec. Asst. (1) Appraiser (8) Appraiser (7) Appraiser (30) Sr. Map Tech. (2)Ex. Specialist (8) Project Coor. (1) Supp Coord. (1) Maintenance (1) Support (2)Map Tech. (6)Sr. Asst. Spec. (1) DB Admin (2) Appeals Sup. (2) Asst. Specialist (11) IT. Specialist (1) Mail Clerk (1) IT Support (1) Page 19 Department Position Budgeted Salary Budgeted Benefits Budgeted Auto Administration #101 Chief Appraiser $230,000-$241,500 $16,100 $11,100 (4 Positions)(2)Deputy Chief Appraiser $170,000-$178,500 $16,100 $11,100 Director of Human Resources $120,000-$140,000 $16,100 $5,500 Business Operations #100 Director of Business Operations $136,500-$147,000 $16,100 $5,500 (5 Positions)Executive Assistant $80,000-$84,000 $16,100 $5,500 Building and Grounds Maintenance $65,000-$68,250 $16,100 $5,500 (2)Personnel & Finance Asst.$80,000-$84,000 $16,100 Training & Development #106 Director of Training & Development $95,000-$125,000 $16,100 $11,100 (1 Position) Exemptions & Assistance #102 Director of Exemptions & Assistance $136,500-$147,000 $16,100 $5,500 (24 Positions)Supervisor of Exemptions & Assistance $96,000-$114,450 $16,100 Sr. Taxpayer Assistance Specialist $61,000-$64,050 $16,100 (11) Taxpayer Assistance Specialist $41,600-$57,750 $16,100 Sr. Exemption Specialist $60,000-$64,050 $16,100 (8) Exemption Specialist $41,600-$57,750 $16,100 Mail Clerk $35,000-$55,000 $16,100 Mapping #103 Director of GIS/Mapping $135,750-$146,000 $16,100 $5,500 (12 Positions)Supervisor of GIS/Mapping $108,000-$115,000 $16,100 GIS Specialist $80,000-$95,000 $16,100 GIS Analyst $71,000-$75,000 $16,100 Sr. Mapping Tech $60,400-$65,000 $16,100 (7) Mapping Tech $49,000-$57,500 $16,100 Information Technology #104 Director of Information Technology $134,500-$147,000 $16,100 $5,500 (9 Positions)(2)Supervisor of Information Technology $115,000-$120,750 $16,100 System Administrator $95,000-$103,950 $16,100 IT Specialist $87,000-$91,350 $16,100 IT Support $65,000-$79,800 $16,100 (2) Database Administrator $70,000-$103,950 $16,100 Project Coordinator $96,000-$103,950 $16,100 Page 20 Commercial #201 Director of Commercial Appraisal $138,000-$146,000 $16,100 $11,100 (12 Positions)Supervisor of Commercial Appraisal $105,000-$115,000 $16,100 $11,100 (2)Sr. Commercial Appraiser $92,500-$105,000 $16,100 $11,100 (6) Commercial Appraiser $82,500-$95,000 $16,100 $11,100 (2) Appraisal Support $50,000-$61,000 $16,100 Appeals #202 Director of Appeals $126,500-$140,000 $16,100 $5,500 (6 Positions)TLO / ARB Coordinator $94,800-$103,950 $16,100 Supplement Coordinator $63,000-$70,350 $16,100 (2)Appeals Support $51,710-$70,350 $16,100 Legal Specialist $90,000-$103,950 Business Personal Property #203 Director of BPP Appraisal $135,750-$142,000 $16,100 $11,100 (12 Positions)BPP Supervisor $95,000-$110,000 $16,100 $11,100 (2)BPP Senior Appraiser $91,000-$95,000 $16,100 $11,100 (7) BPP Appraiser $58,000-$90,000 $16,100 $11,100 BPP Appraisal Support $53,200-$57,000 $16,100 Residential #204 Director of Residential Appraisal $139,000-$146,000 $16,100 $11,100 (40 Postitions)(4)Residential Supervisor $95,000-$110,000 $16,100 $11,100 (8) Sr. Residential Appraiser $85,000-$95,000 $16,100 $11,100 (25) Residential Appraiser $62,000-$85,000 $16,100 $11,100 (2)Agriculture Appraiser $58,000-$85,000 $16,100 $11,100 Page 21 2025 CAPITAL EXPENSES DEPT #100 - BUSINESS OPERATIONS (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $1,000.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$500.00 BUSINESS OPERATIONS TOTAL = $1,500.00 DEPT #101 - ADMINISTRATION (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $2,500.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$2,000.00 ADMINISTRATION TOTAL = $4,500.00 DEPT #102 - EXEMPTIONS & ASSISTANCE (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $8,250.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$2,500.00 EXEMPTIONS & ASSISTANCE TOTAL = $10,750.00 DEPT #103 - MAPPING (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $6,300.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$2,000.00 MAPPING TOTAL = $8,300.00 DEPT #104 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $5,300.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$2,000.00 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TOTAL = $7,300.00 DEPT #105 OVERHEAD (1) AUDIO/VIDEO EQUIPMENT $5,000.00 (2) ARB EQUIPMENT $4,000.00 (3) PROJECTORS/PC'S $3,000.00 (4) MISCELLANEOUS $2,000.00 OVERHEAD TOTAL = 14,000.00$ DEPT #106 - TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $1,300.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$200.00 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT TOTAL = $1,500.00 DEPT #201 - COMMERCIAL (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $5,000.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$2,000.00 COMMERCIAL TOTAL = 7,000.00$ Page 22 ACCT # 5510 - FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT DEPT #202 - APPEALS (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $4,000.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$2,000.00 APPEALS TOTAL = 6,000.00$ DEPT #203 - PERSONAL PROPERTY (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $4,000.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$2,000.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY TOTAL = $6,000.00 DEPT #204 - RESIDENTIAL (1) REPLACEMENT DESKS & CHAIRS $15,000.00 (2) MISCELLANEOUS (SCANNERS, STAPLERS, ETC.)$3,000.00 RESIDENTIAL TOTAL = 18,000.00$ Page 23 85 Policy and Worksession RequestsDate Received Council Member RequestorInitiated ByStatus ActionSummary of RequestStaff AssignedDepartmentComments05/17/24 Council Member McGeeResidentIn ProgressWindsor Drive extensionFarhan ButtPublic Works-TrafficRoad Safety Audit underway, expectedcompletion with recommended safetyaction plan initial draft available by end ofJune 2024. Final draft submittal mid-July2024.05/22/24 Council Member ByrdCouncil MemberIn ProgressCable boxesJerry FielderDMEReferred to staff, currently investigating05/28/24 Mayor HudspethResidentCompleteFry Street Fair request for HOT funds | Database ofevent organizers | Fencing for special eventsChristine Taylor, Daniel Jones Grants Administration ParksReferred to staff. Grants departmentproviding event organizer with thepaperwork. Staff provided additionalresponses relating to events andresources.05/30/24 Council Member HollandCouncil MemberCompletePothole on Hobson LnEthan CoxPublic Works -StreetsStaff provided temporary fix currentlyevaluating schedule to add this to themaintenance schedule.05/31/24 Council Member BeckResidentComplete2-day water conservation and smart irrigation systems Haley SalazarWaterStaff stated that most smart irrigationsystems can be set to two days and ifproper moisture is detected will skip to thenext programmed day.06/03/24 Council Member ByrdResidentCompleteHistorical designation for Opera HouseCameron RobersonDevelopment ServicesReferred to staff for additional informationregarding historical designation process.06/03/24 Mayor HudspethOtherCompleteDenco Area 911 District Vote for Board of ManagerpositionsLauren ThodenCity Secretary's OfficeDetermine how to submit the for the boardof managers positions.06/04/24 Council Member HollandCouncil MemberIn ProgressGraffiti on railroad trestle on Fort Worth Drive.ParksReferred to sftaff.06/04/24 Mayor HudspethCouncil MemberCompleteShort Term Rentals note and questionsScott McDonaldDevelopment ServicesStaff provided list of questions andresponses to the questions.06/04/24 Council Member BeckResidentCompleteClassification of Windsor Road extensionJulie WyattDevelopment ServicesThe classification was incorrectly enteredas Secondary Arterial. It has beenupdated to Major Collector. Residentswere notified of the change.06/05/24 Council Member HollandResidentCompleteOutdoor Warning System (OWS) sirens not available insome neighborhoods (newer developments)Bob MartinezFireEM is researching with a vendor onadding future OWS locations in areas thatare newly developed or in thedevelopment stage. EM has been incommunication with the resident.06/06/24 Council Member HollandResidentCompletePersonal Water WellsStephen GayWaterResident inquired about personal waterwells for local residents. Staff contactedthe resident. and provided the residentwith the resources.Page 1 of 1Exported on June 7, 2024 12:38:14 PM PDT86 Meeting Calendar City of Denton City Hall 215 E. McKinney St. Denton, Texas 76201 www.cityofdenton.com Criteria : Begin Date: 6/1/2024, End Date: 8/31/2024 Date Time Meeting LocationMeeting Body June 2024 6/3/2024 5:30 PM Board of Ethics Council Work Session Room 6/3/2024 6:00 PM Parks, Recreation and Beautification Board Civic Center Community Room 6/4/2024 2:00 PM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 6/6/2024 8:00 AM Agenda Committee Council Work Session Room 6/6/2024 8:30 AM Economic Development Partnership Board Development Service Center 6/6/2024 4:00 PM Public Art Committee Civic Center Community Room 6/7/2024 1:00 PM Sustainability Framework Advisory Committee Council Work Session Room 6/10/2024 9:00 AM Public Utilities Board Council Work Session Room 6/10/2024 5:30 PM Historic Landmark Commission Development Service Center 6/10/2024 5:30 PM Library Board Cancelled 6/11/2024 9:00 AM Committee on the Environment Council Work Session Room 6/12/2024 11:00 AM Economic Development Partnership Board Development Service Center 6/12/2024 3:00 PM Airport Advisory Board Airport Terminal Meeting Room 6/12/2024 5:00 PM Planning and Zoning Commission Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 6/13/2024 3:00 PM Health & Building Standards Commission Development Service Center 6/14/2024 12:00 PM Community Services Advisory Committee CANCELLED 6/18/2024 2:00 PM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 6/21/2024 9:00 AM Community Partnership Committee City Council Work Session Room 6/21/2024 5:00 PM City Council Development Service Center 6/22/2024 8:30 AM City Council Development Service Center Page 1City of Denton Printed on 6/7/2024 87 Date Time Meeting LocationMeeting Body Meeting Calendar continued... 6/24/2024 9:00 AM Public Utilities Board Council Work Session Room 6/24/2024 5:30 PM Zoning Board of Adjustment Development Service Center 6/26/2024 10:00 AM Mobility Committee Council Work Session Room 6/26/2024 5:00 PM Planning and Zoning Commission Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 6/28/2024 1:00 PM Sustainability Framework Advisory Committee Council Work Session Room 6/28/2024 7:00 PM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers July 2024 7/1/2024 6:00 PM Parks, Recreation and Beautification Board Civic Center Community Room 7/8/2024 9:00 AM Public Utilities Board Council Work Session Room 7/8/2024 5:30 PM Historic Landmark Commission Development Service Center 7/8/2024 5:30 PM Library Board South Branch Library 7/10/2024 10:00 AM Animal Shelter Advisory Committee Animal Services Training Room 7/10/2024 11:00 AM Economic Development Partnership Board Development Service Center 7/10/2024 3:00 PM Airport Advisory Board Airport Terminal Meeting Room 7/11/2024 3:00 PM Health & Building Standards Commission Development Service Center 7/12/2024 12:00 PM Community Services Advisory Committee Development Service Center 7/16/2024 2:00 PM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 7/18/2024 3:00 PM Committee on Persons with Disabilities Development Service Center 7/22/2024 9:00 AM Public Utilities Board Council Work Session Room 7/22/2024 5:30 PM Zoning Board of Adjustment Development Service Center 7/23/2024 2:00 PM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 7/24/2024 12:00 PM Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone Number One Board Development Service Center 7/24/2024 5:00 PM Planning and Zoning Commission Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 7/26/2024 1:00 PM Sustainability Framework Advisory Committee Council Work Session Room Page 2City of Denton Printed on 6/7/202488 Date Time Meeting LocationMeeting Body Meeting Calendar continued... 7/31/2024 10:00 AM Mobility Committee Council Work Session Room August 2024 8/1/2024 8:00 AM Agenda Committee Council Work Session Room 8/1/2024 8:30 AM Economic Development Partnership Board Development Service Center 8/6/2024 2:00 PM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 8/8/2024 3:00 PM Health & Building Standards Commission Development Service Center 8/9/2024 12:00 PM Community Services Advisory Committee Development Service Center 8/10/2024 9:00 AM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 8/12/2024 9:00 AM Public Utilities Board Council Work Session Room 8/12/2024 5:30 PM Historic Landmark Commission Development Service Center 8/12/2024 5:30 PM Library Board Emily Fowler Central Library 8/14/2024 3:00 PM Airport Advisory Board Airport Terminal Meeting Room 8/14/2024 5:00 PM Planning and Zoning Commission Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 8/20/2024 2:00 PM City Council Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers 8/23/2024 9:00 AM Community Partnership Committee City Hall Conference Room 8/23/2024 1:00 PM Sustainability Framework Advisory Committee Council Work Session Room 8/26/2024 5:30 PM Zoning Board of Adjustment Development Service Center 8/28/2024 10:00 AM Mobility Committee Council Work Session Room 8/28/2024 5:00 PM Planning and Zoning Commission Council Work Session Room & Council Chambers Page 3City of Denton Printed on 6/7/2024 89 Meeting Date Item Legistar ID Departments Involved Type Dry Run Date Estimated Time A. Electric Systems Operations: Phase 1 and Phase 2 Audit 23-2460 Internal Audit City Business 6/11/2024 0:30 B. Climate Action and Adaptation Plan 24-903 Environmental Svcs & Sustnblty City Business 6/4/2024 1:00 C. Ad Valorem Rates and General Fund Forecast 24-239 Finance City Business 6/4/2024 0:30 D. AC/HOA 24-1111 Community Services Council Request 6/4/2024 0:30 E. Two Minute Pitch: McGee 24-1004 City Manager's Office Council Request 0:30 Closed Meeting Item(s):Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 3:30 A. Ethics Training 24-1066 Internal Audit City Business 0:20 A. Fiscal Year 2024-25 preliminary Capital Improvement Program 24-225 Finance City Business 7/2/2024 0:30 B. Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update 24-020 Water Utilities City Business 7/9/2024 1:00 C. Rayzor Ranch Public Improvement District TBD City Manager's Office City Business 0:30 D. Convention and Visitor's Bureau Analysis TBD City Manager's Office City Business 1:00 E. Two Minute Pitch:24-1005 City Manager's Office Council Request 0:30 Closed Meeting Item(s):Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 4:00 A. Annual Audit Plan TBD Internal Audit City Business 0:15 B. Fiscal Year 2024-25 preliminary utility budgets and rates for Solid Waste, Water, Wastewater/Drainage, Electric and Customer Service 24-226 Finance City Business 7/9/2024 1:00 C. Value of Solar TBD Finance City Business 6/3/2024 0:30 D. Affordable Housing Bond Discussion 24-287 Community Development City Business 7/9/2024 0:45 E. City Council Committee Assignments 24-1193 City Secretary's Office City Business 7/2/2024 0:45 F. Two Minute Pitch:24-1006 City Manager's Office Council Request 0:30 Closed Meeting Item(s):Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 4:15 A. Follow-Up of Payroll Admin. Audit 24-250 Internal Audit City Business 0:15 B. Follow-Up of Fleet Services Audit 24-251 Internal Audit City Business 0:15 C. Audit of Vendor Management 24-249 Internal Audit City Business 0:30 D. Community Housing Initiatives Audit 23-2458 Internal Audit City Business 5/28/2024 0:30 E. Non-Annexation Agreements 24-1131 City Manager's Office City Business 0:45 F. Two Minute Pitch:24-1007 City Manager's Office Council Request 0:30 Closed Meeting Item(s): Council Appointed Position Performance Reviews: City Manager and City Attorney Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 3:15 A. Fiscal Year 2024-25 City Manager’s Proposed Budget, Capital Improvement Program, and Five-Year Financial Forecast 24-227 Finance City Business TBD Closed Meeting Item(s):Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 0:30 A. Audit of Development Planning 24-252 Internal Audit City Business 0:30 B. Affordable Housing Bond Discussion 24-287 Community Development City Business 0:45 C. Fiscal Year 2024-25 City Manager’s Proposed Budget, Capital Improvement Program, and Five-Year Financial Forecast 24-228 Finance City Business 1:00 D. Two Minute Pitch:TBD City Manager's Office Council Request 0:30 Closed Meeting Item(s): Council Appointed Position Performance Reviews: City Auditor and Municipal Judge Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 3:15 A. B. C. D. Closed Meeting Item(s): Council Appointed Position Performance Reviews: City Auditor and Municipal Judge Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 0:30 A. Business Inclusion Program TBD Procurement City Business 0:30 B. C. D. Closed Meeting Item(s): Council Appointed Position Performance Reviews: City Auditor and Municipal Judge Legal (if any)City Business 0:30 Total Est. Time: 1:00 Item Legistar ID Departments Type Estimated Work Session Date Parking Minimum TBD Development Services Council Request TBD Second Follow-Up of Police Property Room Audit (15 min.)24-253 Internal Audit City Business 09/17/2024 Follow-up of EMS: Ambulance Billing Audit (15 min.)24-254 Internal Audit City Business 09/17/2024 Audit of Park Management & Planning (30 min.)24-255 Internal Audit City Business 09/24/2024 Business Inclusion Program TBD City Manager's Office City Business 0:00 Mosely Road Landfill 24-1025 Solid Waste City Business TBD Item Dates Departments Type Estimated Work Item Date Approved Department Estimated Hours to Complete Requestor Vote Centers Resolution 10/17/2023 City Manager's Office TBD CM McGee September 10 (IF NEEDED FOR BUDGET) Work Session (@2:00 p.m.) Special Called Meeting (@6:30 p.m.) Other Major Items for Meeting: September 17 Work Session (@2:00 p.m.) Regular Called Meeting (@6:30 p.m.) Other Major Items for Meeting: Approved Council Pitches to be Scheduled Council Priorities and Significant Work Plan Items to be Scheduled City Council Retreat - Day 2 24-1067 City Manager's Office City Business 8:00 June 22 City Council Retreat - Day 2 Other Major Items for Meeting: August 10 (Saturday) Budget Workshop (@9:00 a.m.) At the Council Work Session Room Other Major Items for Meeting: July 23 Work Session (@2:00 p.m.) Special Called Meeting (@6:30 p.m.) August 6 Work Session (@2:00 p.m.) Regular Called Meeting (@6:30 p.m.) August 20 Work Session (@2:00 p.m.) Regular Called Meeting (@6:30 p.m.) Other Major Items for Meeting: Other Major Items for Meeting: Other Major Items for Meeting: July 16 Work Session (@2:00 p.m.) Regular Meeting (@6:30 p.m.) Work Session To Be Determined Other Major Items for Meeting: June 18 Work Session (@2:00 p.m.) Regular Meeting (@6:30 p.m.) June 21 City Council Retreat - Day 1 City Council Retreat - Day 1 24-1065 City Manager's Office City Business 2:00 Tentative Work Session Topics and Meeting Information Updated: June 7, 2024 *This is for planning purposes only. Dates are subject to change.90 1 Street Closure Report: Upcoming ClosuresSCR Jun 10th – 16thStreet/ IntersectionFromToClosure StartDateClosure EndDateDescriptionDepartmentDepartment Contact Closure Type1Amistad LnJohn Payne RdEagle Mountain Dr06/17/24 07/12/24 ADA and Sidewalk RepairStreetsRoy San MiguelFull ClosureExported on June 7, 2024 11:19:38 AM CDT91 2 Street Closure Report: Current ClosuresStreet/ IntersectionFromToClosure StartDateClosure EndDateDescriptionDepartmentDepartment Contact Closure Type1Allred RdOakleaf TrlJohn Paine Rd04/26/24 08/30/24 New road for Allred forSagebrook PH llPublic Works Inspections Kent Bull RiversFull Closure2Ave DChestnut StMulberry St06/03/24 07/31/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure3Azalea StParvin StLaurel St05/30/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure4Bell AveSycamore StPrairie St08/21/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigRolling Closure5Bernard StAcme StRoselawn Dr05/30/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure6Bonnie Brae St & Riney RdintersectionBonnie Brae St @ Riney Rd Riney Rd @ Bonnie Brae St 06/10/24 06/14/24 Floyd Smith going to install 5ftwide temp sidewalk atsoutheast corner of theintersectionOtherMuhamad MadhatLane Closure7Bradshaw StWilson StPrairie St01/30/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure8Bradshaw StPrairie StSycamore St03/13/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure9Brinker RdLoop 288Quail Creek Dr05/28/24 06/28/24 Basefailure Repairs and CrackSealStreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure10Broken Arrow RdDunes StOld Orchard Ln05/18/24 06/30/24 Pavement Reconstruction EngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure11Broken Arrow RdDunes StOld Orchard Ln04/22/24 07/29/24 Utility Replacement & StreetReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure12Broken Bow StWindsor DrDunes St04/22/24 07/29/24 Utility Replacement & StreetReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure13Camellia StParvin StLaurel St05/30/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure14Central AveMaple StHighland St06/03/24 07/31/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure15Chestnut StAve CAve D06/03/24 07/31/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure16Churchill DrChurchill CirWindsor Dr12/11/23 07/16/24 Utility installations andpavement replacementEngineeringTaylor Holt17College Park DrPeach StDead End10/02/23 06/21/24 Street reconstructStreetsRoy San MiguelFull Closure18Collins StJohnson StDead End West08/22/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure19Crawford StMulberry StSycamore St10/09/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure20Crescent StEctor StHillcrest St12/27/23 07/12/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure21Dunes StBroken Arrow RdBroken Bow St04/22/24 07/29/24 Utility Replacement & StreetReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure22Fowler DrCollege Park DrPeach St10/02/23 06/21/24 Street reconstructStreetsRoy San MiguelFull Closure23Hickory Creek RdRiverpass DrFM 183003/13/23 12/31/24 Bridge InstallationEngineeringDustin DraperFull Closure24Highland StLocust StWainwright St01/30/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure25Hillcrest StPanhandle StCrescent St12/27/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure26Jamestown LnMistywood LnLocksley Ln01/22/24 07/16/24 Utility Replacement & StreetReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure27Maid Marion PlJamestown LnLocksley Ln01/24/24 07/16/24 Utility Replacement & StreetReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure28Maple StElm StCarroll Blvd09/15/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.Scott FettigFull Closure29Maple StLocust StElm St04/19/24 06/30/24 Pavement replacement. EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure30Maple StCarroll BlvdElm St07/05/23 07/01/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure31Maple StAve DAve A01/22/24 08/01/24 Pavement replacement. EngineeringScott FettigRolling Closure32Masch Branch RdUniversity Dr (US 380)Hampton Rd02/26/24 06/27/24 Reconstruction of Center lane,adding turn lane.Private Development PublicWorks InspectionsEthan KeithLane Closure33Mayhill Rd@ Colorado BlvdIntersection01/31/24 06/30/24 This closure will encompass thereconstruction of the Coloradoand Mayhill Intersection.EngineeringTracy L. Beck, PE, PMP Lane Closure Exported on June 7, 2024 11:19:49 AM CDT92 Street/ IntersectionFromToClosure StartDateClosure EndDateDescriptionDepartmentDepartment Contact Closure Type34Mayhill Rd@ Colorado BlvdIntersection05/28/24 08/15/24 This closure will encompass thereconstruction of the Mayhill Rd/ Colorado Blvd Intersection.EngineeringJohn RhodaLane Closure35Mayhill Rd (SB)University Dr (US 380)Prominence Pkwy04/15/24 06/14/24 Installation of new drivewayapproachesPrivate Development PublicWorks InspectionsZabdiel MotaLane Closure36Montecito DrHickory Creek RdClear River Ln06/03/24 07/19/24 ADA and Sidewalk Repair StreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure37Montecito DrHickory Creek RdPalo Verde Dr05/28/24 08/30/24 Street ReconstructionStreetsRoy San MiguelFull Closure38Mulberry StLocust StElm St02/19/24 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure39Mulberry StWood StCrawford St10/09/23 07/01/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure40Mulberry StBell AveIndustrial St08/21/23 07/12/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure41Myrtle StFort Worth Dr (HW377)Eagle Dr06/05/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure42Myrtle StMaple StHighland St07/05/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.Scott FettigFull Closure43Myrtle StEagle DrMaple St07/05/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure44Old Orchard LnWindsor DrDead End03/13/24 07/16/24 Utility Replacement & StreetReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure45Peach StBell StLocust St10/02/23 06/21/24 Street reconstructStreetsRoy San MiguelFull Closure46Pembrooke Pl (2129)Chasewood LnLongridge Dr05/27/24 06/28/24 Curb Repair and Asphalt Patch StreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure47Pierce StMaple StHighland St07/05/23 06/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.Scott FettigFull Closure48Poinsettia BlvdSherman DrPicadilly Ln05/18/24 06/21/24 infrastructure installation onPoinsettaPublic Works Inspections Lee ThurmondFull Closure49Prairie StLocust StBradshaw St04/01/24 07/31/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.Scott FettigRolling Closure50Spencer RdLoop 288Mayhill Rd05/06/24 06/12/24 adding 300 feet of spencer road Public Works Inspections Ryan CubaFull Closure51Sycamore StExposition StCrawford St03/13/23 06/14/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure52Sycamore StWood StCrawford St10/09/23 06/14/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure53Sycamore StExposition StRailroad Tracks on Sycamore 08/17/23 06/28/24 Paving improvements fromExposition to RailroadPublic Works Inspections Stephany TrammellFull Closure54Walt ParkerBonnie BraeBonnie Brae06/10/24 06/14/24 Installation of Sanitary Sewerline crossing Walt Parker Drive,NO ACCESS TO WALTPARKER FROM BONNIEBRAE, Access Walt Parker fromNorth Texas BlvdEngineeringRobin DavisFull Closure55Waterside Pl (7700)Hickory Creek RdDawn Light Dr05/20/24 06/14/24 Sidewalk and ADA Repair StreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure56Welch St SEagle DrHighland St06/03/24 08/31/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure57Wellington DrNorth of Heather LnChurchill Dr12/11/23 07/16/24 Utility installations andpavement replacementEngineeringTaylor Holt Exported on June 7, 2024 11:19:49 AM CDT93 3 Street Closure Report: Completed ClosuresStreet/ IntersectionFromToClosure StartDateClosure EndDateDescriptionDepartmentDepartment Contact Closure Type1Ave HAve HStella St02/26/24 04/16/24 DME ConduitPrivate DevelopmentEthan KeithLane Closure2Beall St (1400)Nicosia StHermalinda Dr05/06/24 06/07/24 Curb and Gutter Repair StreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure3Bellaire DrMontclair PlMcKinney St (East)04/22/24 05/29/24 Valley Gutter RepairStreetsRoy San MiguelFull Closure4Edwards RdForrest Willow RdDesert Willow Dr03/18/24 05/24/24 Concrete Panel and SidewalkRepairStreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure5Fairfax RdSavannah TrailLongridge Dr05/20/24 05/24/24 Sewer line trench repair WastewaterGavin PetnerFull Closure6Mayhill Rd (NB)University Dr (US 380)Prominence Pkwy04/22/24 05/24/24 Tying new water line intoexisting water line on N. MayhillRoad for 380/Mayhill Industrial.Private DevelopmentZabdiel MotaLane Closure7Mill Pond RdEmerson LnOld North Rd09/11/23 05/15/24 Utility Installations & PavementReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure8Nora LnCentral Village DrMark Ln04/08/24 05/10/24 Sidewalk RepairStreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure9Oakwood DrMcCormick StDead End East10/02/23 05/31/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure10Pecan StElm StLocust St05/13/24 05/13/24 Crane set up to replace airconditioner on top of buildingPrivate DevelopmentPete LeptuchFull Closure11Pecan Tree DrNora LnDead End North04/08/24 05/10/24 Sidewalk RepairStreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure12Pembrooke PlChasewood LnLongridge Dr04/17/24 05/31/24 stormwater replacement DrainageStephen BonnerLane Closure13Pickwick LnOxford LnWindsor Dr08/21/23 05/08/24 Utility Replacement & StreetReconstructionEngineeringTaylor HoltFull Closure14Poinsettia BlvdSherman DrPicadilly Ln04/08/24 05/17/24 Infrastructure installation onPoinsettiaPublic Works Inspections Lee ThurmondFull Closure15Regency CtMark LnCountry Club Rd04/08/24 05/10/24 Sidewalk RepairStreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure16Roselawn DrRoselawn CirRailroad crossing02/05/24 06/01/24 Paving, TxDot guardrail, Installnew box culvert. 8x8, new roadfor Roselawn. Eagle Creek PH3A-4Private DevelopmentTaylor HardgraveFull Closure17Thomas StEmery StPanhandle St04/19/24 05/10/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigRolling Closure18Walnut StElm StLocust St05/24/24 05/24/24 Installing new air conditioningunit by cranePrivate DevelopmentJayson RaymerFull Closure19Westward DrNorthwaySouthway04/22/24 05/17/24 Concrete street paving. Private DevelopmentZabdiel MotaFull Closure20Willowwood StBernard StJacqueline Dr12/27/23 05/30/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigRolling Closure21Wind River Ln @ Shoreline Como Lake DrEnchanted Lake Dr05/06/24 06/07/24 Concrete Panel Repair StreetsRoy San MiguelLane Closure22Wisteria StParvin StLaurel St05/30/23 06/01/24 Utility installations andpavement replacement.EngineeringScott FettigFull Closure Exported on June 7, 2024 11:20:02 AM CDT94