7237 IFB-- 2019 Street Reconstruction - SPECIFICATIONS01 33 00 - 1
SUBMITTALS
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
SECTION 01 33 00 1
SUBMITTALS 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes: 5
1. General methods and requirements of submissions applicable to the following 6
Work-related submittals: 7
a. Shop Drawings 8
b. Product Data (including Project Material Submittal Checklist submittals)9
c. Samples 10
d. Mock Ups 11
B. Deviations from this City of Denton Standard Specification 12
1. None. 13
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 14
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 15
2. Division 1 – General Requirements 16
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 17
A. Measurement and Payment 18
1. Work associated with this Item is considered incidental to the various items bid. 19
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 20
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 21
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 22
A. Coordination 23
1. Notify the City in writing, at the time of submittal, of any deviations in the 24
submittals from the requirements of the Contract Documents. 25
2. Coordination of Submittal Times 26
a. Prepare, prioritize and transmit each submittal sufficiently in advance of 27
performing the related Work or other applicable activities, or within the time 28
specified in the individual Work Sections, of the Specifications. 29
b. Contractor is responsible such that the installation will not be delayed by 30
processing times including, but not limited to: 31
a) Disapproval and resubmittal (if required) 32
b) Coordination with other submittals 33
c) Testing 34
d) Purchasing 35
e) Fabrication 36
f) Delivery 37
g) Similar sequenced activities 38
c. No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to 39
transmit submittals sufficiently in advance of the Work. 40
01 33 00 - 2
SUBMITTALS
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
d. Make submittals promptly in accordance with approved schedule, and in such 1
sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the work of any other 2
contractor. 3
B. Submittal Numbering 4
1. When submitting shop drawings or samples, utilize a submittal cross-reference 5
identification numbering system in the following manner: 6
a. Use the applicable Specification Section Number. 7
b. For the next 2 digits number use numbers 01-99 to sequentially number each 8
initial separate item or drawing submitted under each specific Section number. 9
c. Last use a letter, A-Z, indicating the resubmission of the same drawing (i.e. 10
A=2nd submission, B=3rd submission, C=4th submission, etc.). A typical 11
submittal number would be as follows: 12
13
303-02-B14
15
1) 303 is the Specification Section for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement 16
2) 02 is the second initial submittal under this Specification Section 17
3) B is the third submission (second resubmission) of that particular shop 18
drawing 19
C. Contractor Certification 20
1. Review shop drawings, product data and samples, including those by 21
subcontractors, prior to submission to determine and verify the following: 22
a. Field measurements 23
b. Field construction criteria 24
c. Catalog numbers and similar data 25
d. Conformance with the Contract Documents 26
2. Provide each shop drawing, sample and product data submitted by the Contractor 27
with a Certification Statement affixed including: 28
a. The Contractor's Company name 29
b. Signature of submittal reviewer 30
c. Certification Statement 31
1) “By this submittal, I hereby represent that I have determined and verified 32
field measurements, field construction criteria, materials, dimensions, 33
catalog numbers and similar data and I have checked and coordinated each 34
item with other applicable approved shop drawings." 35
D. Submittal Format 36
1. Fold shop drawings larger than 8 ½ inches x 11 inches to 8 ½ inches x 11inches. 37
2. Bind shop drawings and product data sheets together. 38
3. Order 39
a. Cover Sheet 40
1) Description of Packet 41
2) Contractor Certification 42
b. List of items / Table of Contents 43
c. Product Data /Shop Drawings/Samples /Calculations 44
E. Submittal Content 45
1. The date of submission and the dates of any previous submissions 46
2. The Project title and number 47
01 33 00 - 3
SUBMITTALS
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
3. Contractor identification 1
4. The names of: 2
a. Contractor 3
b. Supplier 4
c. Manufacturer 5
5. Identification of the product, with the Specification Section number, page and 6
paragraph(s) 7
6. Field dimensions, clearly identified as such 8
7. Relation to adjacent or critical features of the Work or materials 9
8. Applicable standards, such as ASTM or Federal Specification numbers 10
9. Identification by highlighting of deviations from Contract Documents 11
10. Identification by highlighting of revisions on resubmittals 12
11. An 8-inch x 3-inch blank space for Contractor and City stamps 13
F. Shop Drawings 14
1. As specified in individual Work Sections includes, but is not necessarily limited to: 15
a. Custom-prepared data such as fabrication and erection/installation (working) 16
drawings 17
b. Scheduled information 18
c. Setting diagrams 19
d. Actual shopwork manufacturing instructions 20
e. Custom templates 21
f. Special wiring diagrams 22
g. Coordination drawings 23
h. Individual system or equipment inspection and test reports including: 24
1) Performance curves and certifications 25
i. As applicable to the Work 26
2. Details 27
a. Relation of the various parts to the main members and lines of the structure 28
b. Where correct fabrication of the Work depends upon field measurements 29
1) Provide such measurements and note on the drawings prior to submitting 30
for approval. 31
G. Product Data 32
1. For submittals of product data for products included on the City’s Product Material 33
Submittal Checklist, highlight each item selected for use on the Project. 34
2. For submittals of product data for products not included on the City’s Product 35
Material Submittal Checklist, submittal data may include, but is not necessarily 36
limited to: 37
a. Standard prepared data for manufactured products (sometimes referred to as 38
catalog data) 39
1) Such as the manufacturer's product specification and installation 40
instructions 41
2) Availability of colors and patterns 42
3) Manufacturer's printed statements of compliances and applicability 43
4) Roughing-in diagrams and templates 44
5) Catalog cuts 45
6) Product photographs 46
7) Standard wiring diagrams 47
01 33 00 - 4
SUBMITTALS
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
8) Printed performance curves and operational-range diagrams 1
9) Production or quality control inspection and test reports and certifications 2
10) Mill reports 3
11) Product operating and maintenance instructions and recommended 4
spare-parts listing and printed product warranties 5
12) As applicable to the Work 6
3. Submittals of product data for products not included on the City’s Product Material 7
Submittal Checklist may be considered a Substitution in accordance with Section 8
01 25 00. 9
4. All deviations from City’s Product Material Submittal Checklist shall require 10
approval by the Engineer of Record for the Project. 11
H. Samples 12
1. As specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily limited to:13
a. Physical examples of the Work such as: 14
1) Sections of manufactured or fabricated Work 15
2) Small cuts or containers of materials 16
3) Complete units of repetitively used products color/texture/pattern swatches 17
and range sets 18
4) Specimens for coordination of visual effect 19
5) Graphic symbols and units of Work to be used by the City for independent 20
inspection and testing, as applicable to the Work 21
I. Do not start Work requiring a shop drawing, sample or product data nor any material to 22
be fabricated or installed prior to the approval or qualified approval of such item. 23
1. Fabrication performed, materials purchased or on-site construction accomplished 24
which does not conform to approved shop drawings and data is at the Contractor's 25
risk. 26
2. The City will not be liable for any expense or delay due to corrections or remedies 27
required to accomplish conformity. 28
3. Complete project Work, materials, fabrication, and installations in conformance 29
with approved shop drawings, applicable samples, and product data. 30
J. Submittal Distribution 31
1. Electronic Distribution 32
a. Provide all submittals in electronic form via email to Project Manager and their 33
duly appointed representative. 34
b. Shop Drawings 35
1) Email submittal to Project Manager and their duly appointed representative. 36
2) Hard Copies 37
a) Not required 38
c. Product Data 39
1) Email submittal to Project Manager and their duly appointed representative. 40
2) Hard Copies 41
a) Not required 42
d. Samples 43
1) Distributed to the Project Manager 44
K. Submittal Review 45
1. The review of shop drawings, data and samples will be for general conformance 46
with the design concept and Contract Documents. This is not to be construed as: 47
01 33 00 - 5
SUBMITTALS
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
a. Permitting any departure from the Contract requirements 1
b. Relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including details, 2
dimensions, and materials 3
c. Approving departures from details furnished by the City, except as otherwise 4
provided herein 5
2. The review and approval of shop drawings, samples or product data by the City 6
does not relieve the Contractor from his/her responsibility with regard to the 7
fulfillment of the terms of the Contract. 8
a. All risks of error and omission are assumed by the Contractor, and the City will 9
have no responsibility therefore. 10
3. The Contractor remains responsible for details and accuracy, for coordinating the 11
Work with all other associated work and trades, for selecting fabrication processes, 12
for techniques of assembly and for performing Work in a safe manner. 13
4. If the shop drawings, data or samples as submitted describe variations and show a 14
departure from the Contract requirements which City finds to be in the interest of 15
the City and to be so minor as not to involve a change in Contract Price or time for 16
performance, the City may return the reviewed drawings without noting an 17
exception. 18
5. Submittals will be returned to the Contractor under 1 of the following codes: 19
a. Code 1 20
1) "NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN" is assigned when there are no notations or 21
comments on the submittal. 22
a) When returned under this code the Contractor may release the 23
equipment and/or material for manufacture. 24
b. Code 2 25
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED". This code is assigned when a confirmation of 26
the notations and comments IS NOT required by the Contractor. 27
a) The Contractor may release the equipment or material for manufacture; 28
however, all notations and comments must be incorporated into the 29
final product. 30
c. Code 3 31
1) "EXCEPTIONS NOTED/RESUBMIT". This combination of codes is 32
assigned when notations and comments are extensive enough to require a 33
resubmittal of the package. 34
a) This resubmittal is to address all comments, omissions and 35
non-conforming items that were noted. 36
b) Resubmittal is to be received by the City within 15 Calendar Days of 37
the date of the City's transmittal requiring the resubmittal. 38
d. Code 4 39
1) "NOT APPROVED" is assigned when the submittal does not meet the 40
intent of the Contract Documents. 41
a) The Contractor must resubmit the entire package revised to bring the 42
submittal into conformance. 43
b) It may be necessary to resubmit using a different manufacturer/vendor 44
to meet the Contract Documents. 45
6. Resubmittals 46
a. Handled in the same manner as first submittals 47
1) Corrections other than requested by the City 48
2) Marked with revision triangle or other similar method 49
01 33 00 - 6
SUBMITTALS
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
a) At Contractor’s risk if not marked 1
b. Submittals for each item will be reviewed no more than twice at the City’s 2
expense. 3
1) All subsequent reviews will be performed at times convenient to the City 4
and at the Contractor's expense, based on the City's or City 5
Representative’s then prevailing rates. 6
2) Provide Contractor reimbursement to the City within 30 Calendar Days for 7
all such fees invoiced by the City. 8
c. The need for more than 1 resubmission or any other delay in obtaining City's 9
review of submittals, will not entitle the Contractor to an extension of Contract 10
Time.11
7. Partial Submittals 12
a. City reserves the right to not review submittals deemed partial, at the City’s 13
discretion. 14
b. Submittals deemed by the City to be not complete will be returned to the 15
Contractor, and will be considered "Not Approved" until resubmitted. 16
c. The City may at its option provide a list or mark the submittal directing the 17
Contractor to the areas that are incomplete. 18
8. If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the shop drawings to 19
constitute a change to the Contract Documents, then written notice must be 20
provided thereof to the City at least 7 Calendar Days prior to release for 21
manufacture. 22
9. When the shop drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the City, the 23
Contractor may carry out the construction in accordance therewith and no further 24
changes therein except upon written instructions from the City. 25
10. Each submittal, appropriately coded, will be returned within 30 Calendar Days 26
following receipt of submittal by the City. 27
L. Mock ups 28
1. Mock Up units as specified in individual Sections, include, but are not necessarily 29
limited to, complete units of the standard of acceptance for that type of Work to be 30
used on the Project. Remove at the completion of the Work or when directed. 31
M. Qualifications 32
1. If specifically required in other Sections of these Specifications, submit a P.E. 33
Certification for each item required. 34
N. Request for Information (RFI) 35
1. Contractor Request for additional information 36
a. Clarification or interpretation of the contract documents 37
b. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between Contract Documents 38
c. When the Contractor believes there is a conflict between the Drawings and 39
Specifications 40
1) Identify the conflict and request clarification 41
d. When the Contractor encounters an unknown condition in the field 42
2. Use the Request for Information (RFI) form provided by the City (attached). 43
3. Numbering of RFI 44
a. Prefix with “RFI” followed by series number, “-xxx”, beginning with “01” and 45
increasing sequentially with each additional transmittal. 46
01 33 00 - 7
SUBMITTALS
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
4. Sufficient information shall be attached to permit a written response without further 1
information. 2
5. The City will log each request and will review the request. 3
a. If review of the project information request indicates that a change to the 4
Contract Documents is required, the City will issue a Field Order or Change 5
Order, as appropriate. 6
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 7
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 8
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 9
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 10
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]11
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 12
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 13
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 14
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 15
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 16
END OF SECTION 17
18
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
19
20
01 33 00 - 8
SUBMITTALS
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 1
2
Project: RFI #:
Engineering Project No.: Date Sent:
Sender: Receiver:
Copies To:
3
Subject:
Request:
Sender’s Proposed Answer/Solution:
4
THE PROPOSED ANSWER/SOLUTION IS, IS NOT, INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT. 5
6
Receiver’s Response:
7
Response By: Company: Date:
8
DISTRIBUTION:
9
01 58 13 - 1
TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
SECTION 01 58 13 1
TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes: 5
1. Temporary Project Signage Requirements 6
B. Deviations from this City of Denton Standard Specification 7
1. None. 8
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:9
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 10
2. Division 1 – General Requirements 11
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 12
A. Measurement and Payment 13
1. Temporary Project Sign 14
a. Measurement 15
1) Measurement for this Item will be per each project sign installed. 16
b. Payment 17
1) The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item 18
and measured as provided under “Measurement” shall be paid for at the 19
unit price bid per each “Temporary Project Sign.” 20
c. The price bid shall include: 21
1) Installation of Temporary Project Sign 22
2) Excavation 23
3) Hauling 24
4) Disposal of excess Materials 25
5) Maintenance and Repair of Signs During Construction 26
6) Removal and Disposal of Temporary Project Sign 27
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 28
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 29
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 30
1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS/INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 31
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 32
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 33
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED]34
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 35
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 36
01 58 13 - 2
TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 1
PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2
2.1 OWNER-FURNISHED [OR] OWNER-SUPPLIEDPRODUCTS [NOT USED] 3
2.2 EQUIPMENT, PRODUCT TYPES, AND MATERIALS 4
A. Design Criteria5
1. Provide free standing Project Designation Sign as indicated below: 6
7
The flag shall resemble the Texas Flag. The background of 8
the stars and the “City of Denton” lettering shall be blue. 9
The lower bar of the flag shall be red, and the upper bar 10
shall be white. The dimensions, from the farthest ends, shall 11
be 12-inches vertically and 23.5-inches horizontally. The 12
flag shall appear in the dimensions shown. The contractor 13
may request a digital copy in either .jpg or .tif format. 14
15
2. The Project Designation Sign shall be placed at strategic points with lettering as 16
needed to adequately describe the work. 17
3. Signs shall be painted white with blue letters and symbols. Letter size shall conform 18
to dimensions shown on sign drawing. Exceptions or variations from the sign 19
shown above shall not be allowed. 20
B. Materials 21
1. Sign 22
a. Constructed of ¾-inch fir plywood, grade A-C (exterior) or better 23
01 58 13 - 3
TEMPORARY PROJECT SIGNAGE
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
2.3 ACCESSORIES [NOT USED] 1
2.4 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL [NOT USED] 2
PART 3 - EXECUTION 3
3.1 INSTALLERS [NOT USED] 4
3.2 EXAMINATION [NOT USED] 5
3.3 PREPARATION [NOT USED]6
3.4 INSTALLATION 7
A. General 8
1. Provide vertical installation at extents of project. 9
2. Signs shall be placed prior to beginning the Work and maintained until the end of 10
the project. 11
3. Relocate sign as needed, upon request of the City. 12
B. Mounting options13
a. Skids 14
b. Posts 15
c. Barricade 16
3.5 -- 3.12 [NOT USED] 17
3.6 MAINTENANCE 18
A. General 19
1. Maintenance will include painting and repairs as needed or directed by the City. 20
3.7 ATTACHMENTS [NOT USED] 21
END OF SECTION 22
23
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
24
01 70 00 - 1
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 1 of 3
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
SECTION 01 70 00 1
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes: 5
1. Mobilization and Demobilization 6
a. Mobilization 7
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies 8
to the Site9
2) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation 10
at the Site 11
3) Premiums paid for performance and payment bonds 12
4) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies 13
to another location within the designated Site 14
5) Relocation of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s operation 15
from 1 location to another location on the Site. 16
b. Demobilization 17
1) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating supplies 18
away from the Site including disassembly 19
2) Site Clean-up 20
3) Removal of all buildings and/or other facilities assembled at the Site for this 21
Contract 22
c. Mobilization and Demobilization do not include activities for specific items of 23
work that are for which payment is provided elsewhere in the contract. 24
2. Remobilization 25
a. Remobilization for Suspension of Work specifically required in the Contract 26
Documents or as required by City includes: 27
1) Demobilization 28
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating 29
supplies from the Site including disassembly or temporarily securing 30
equipment, supplies, and other facilities as designated by the Contract 31
Documents necessary to suspend the Work. 32
b) Site Clean-up as designated in the Contract Documents 33
2) Remobilization 34
a) Transportation of Contractor’s personnel, equipment, and operating 35
supplies to the Site necessary to resume the Work. 36
b) Establishment of necessary general facilities for the Contractor’s 37
operation at the Site necessary to resume the Work. 38
3) No Payments will be made for: 39
a) Mobilization and Demobilization from one location to another on the 40
Site in the normal progress of performing the Work. 41
b) Stand-by or idle time 42
c) Lost profits 43
44
01 70 00 - 2
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
B. Deviations from this City of Denton Standard Specification 1
1. None. 2
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to: 3
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 4
2. Division 1 – General Requirements 5
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 6
A. Measurement and Payment 7
1. Mobilization and Demobilization 8
a. Measurement 9
1) This Item will be measured by the lump sum as the work progresses. 10
b. Payment 11
1) For this Item, the adjusted Contract amount will be calculated as the total 12
Contract amount less the lump sum for mobilization. Mobilization shall be 13
made in partial payments as follows: 14
a) When 1% of the adjusted Contract amount for construction Items is 15
earned, 50% of the mobilization lump sum bid will be paid. 16
b) When 5% of the adjusted Contract amount for construction Items is 17
earned, 75% of the mobilization lump sum bid will be paid. Previous 18
payments under the Item will be deducted from this amount. 19
c) When 10% of the adjusted Contract amount for construction Items is 20
earned, 100% of the mobilization lump sum bid will be paid. Previous 21
payments under the Item will be deducted from this amount. 22
d) A bid containing a total for “Mobilization” in excess of 10% of total 23
contract shall be considered unbalanced and a cause for consideration 24
of rejection. 25
c. The price bid shall include: 26
1) Mobilization of equipment to Site 27
2) Performance Bond 28
3) Payment Bond 29
4) Maintenance Bond 30
5) Remobilization as identified in the Contract Documents 31
6) Demobilization 32
d. No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated this 33
Item. 34
2. Remobilization for suspension of Work not identified in the Contract Documents, 35
as required by City 36
a. Measurement and Payment 37
1) This shall be submitted as a Contract Claim in accordance with Article 10 38
of Section 00 72 00. 39
2) No payments will be made for standby, idle time, or lost profits associated 40
with this Item. 41
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 42
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS [NOT USED] 43
1.5 SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 44
1.6 INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 45
01 70 00 - 3
MOBILIZATION AND REMOBILIZATION
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 1
1.8 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL SUBMITTALS [NOT USED] 2
1.9 QUALITY ASSURANCE [NOT USED] 3
1.10 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING [NOT USED] 4
1.11 FIELD [SITE] CONDITIONS [NOT USED] 5
1.12 WARRANTY [NOT USED] 6
PART 2 - PRODUCTS [NOT USED] 7
PART 3 - EXECUTION [NOT USED] 8
END OF SECTION 9
10
Revision Log
DATE NAME SUMMARY OF CHANGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
01 77 19 - 1
CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF DENTON .
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS
Revised September 20, 2018
SECTION 01 77 19 1
CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS 2
PART 1 - GENERAL 3
1.1 SUMMARY 4
A. Section Includes: 5
1. The procedure for closing out a contract 6
B. Deviations from this City of Denton Standard Specification 7
1. None. 8
C. Related Specification Sections include, but are not necessarily limited to:9
1. Division 0 – Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms and Conditions of the Contract 10
2. Division 1 – General Requirements 11
1.2 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 12
A. Measurement and Payment 13
1. Work associated with this Item is considered incidental to the various Items bid. 14
No separate payment will be allowed for this Item. 15
1.3 REFERENCES [NOT USED] 16
1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 17
A. Guarantees, Bonds and Affidavits 18
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until all guarantees, bonds, 19
certificates, licenses and affidavits required for Work or equipment as specified are 20
satisfactorily filed with the City. 21
B. Release of Liens or Claims22
1. No application for final payment will be accepted until satisfactory evidence of 23
release of liens has been submitted to the City. 24
1.5 SUBMITTALS 25
A. Submit all required documentation to Project Manager. 26
REPORT COVER PAGE
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements
Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018
Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Prepared for:
Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc.
Plano, TX 75024
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Dallas, Texas
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 8901 John W. Carpenter Freeway Dallas, Texas 75247 Registration No. F-3272
P (214) 630 1010 F (214) 630 7070 terracon.com
REPORT COVER LETTER TO SIGN
November 9, 2018
Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc.
5810 Tennyson Parkway, Suite 425
Plano, TX 75024
Attn: Ms. Nancy Cline
Phone: (214) 939 7137
Cell: (972)-898-4668
Email: ncline@pape-dawson.com
Re: Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements
Thomas Street, Scripture Street, Hercules Street, and Windsor Avenue
Denton, Texas
Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Dear Ms. Cline:
This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical
recommendations concerning earthwork and the design and construction of the pavement
reconstruction of the portions of the referenced streets in Denton, Texas. This study was performed
in general accordance with Terracon Proposal No. P94185267 dated August 2, 2018 and your
authorization on August 28, 2018. Comments received on our previous report have been
addressed in this report.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions
concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Nafiz Ahmed, P.E. Tim G. Abrams, P.E.
Senior Engineer Senior Principal
Responsive Resourceful Reliable
REPORT TOPICS
REPORT TOPICS
REPORT SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... I
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
SITE CONDITIONS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................... 1
GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION ...................................................................... 2
GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 3
EARTHWORK ................................................................................................................ 4
PAVEMENTS .................................................................................................................. 6
GENERAL COMMENTS ................................................................................................. 9
Note: This report was originally delivered in a web-based format. Orange Bold text in the report indicates a referenced
section heading. The PDF version also includes hyperlinks which direct the reader to that section and clicking on the
logo will bring you back to this page. For more interactive features, please view your project online at
client.terracon.com.
ATTACHMENTS
EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES
SITE LOCATION, EXPLORATION AND BORING LOCATION PLANS
EXPLORATION RESULTS (Boring Logs, Laboratory Data, and Subsurface Profiles)
SUPPORTING INFORMATION (General Notes and Unified Soil Classification System)
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
i
REPORT SUMMARY
Reconstruction of several streets are planned in Denton, Texas. These streets are Thomas Street,
Scripture Street, Hercules Street, and Windsor Avenue. Twenty-eight borings were drilled to
depths of 2 to 5 feet below existing grades. The purpose of this study is to provide pavement
subgrade preparation and pavement section recommendations.
The following geotechnical considerations were identified:
Generally, subsurface conditions encountered in the borings below the asphalt pavement
consisted of gray, tan, orange, brown and dark gray of fat clays (CH), sandy lean clays
(CH), clayey sand (SC), sand (SP) and gravel. The fat and lean clays have a moderate to
high shrink/swell behavior with moisture changes. Existing fills were encountered in
several borings to depths of 8 inches to 5 feet below existing grades.
Lime and/or cement stabilization can be used for pavement subgrades for this project as
recommended in this report. The areas where sulfate concentration is high, flexible base
materials can be utilized in lieu of lime stabilizations.
Asphalt pavement sections is planned for this project. Pavements will be constructed as
-
-
This summary should be used in conjunction with the entire report for design purposes. It should
be recognized that details were not included or fully developed in this section, and the report must
be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. The section
titled GENERAL COMMENTS should be read for an understanding of the limitations of the report.
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 1
INTRODUCTION
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements
Thomas Street, Scripture Street, Hercules Street, and Windsor Avenue
Denton, Texas
Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
November 9, 2018
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering
services performed for the reconstruction of the portions of the proposed streets, such as Thomas
Street, Scripture Street, Hercules Street, and Windsor Avenue in Denton, Texas. The purpose of
these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative
to:
subsurface soil conditions
groundwater conditions
earthwork
pavement subgrade preparation
pavement design considerations
The geotechnical engineering scope of services for this project included 28 test borings sampled
to depths ranging from approximately 2 to 5 feet below existing grades.
Maps showing the sites and boring locations are shown in the Site Location, Exploration Plan
and Boring Location Plan section of this report. The results of the laboratory testing performed
on soil samples obtained from the site during the field exploration are included in the Exploration
and Testing Procedures and boring logs in the Exploration Results sections of this report.
SITE CONDITIONS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following description of site conditions is derived from our site visit in association with the
field exploration and our review of publicly available geologic and topographic maps.
Item Description
Parcel Information
The following City of Denton streets are planned to be reconstructed. These
:
Thomas Street between Panhandle and Oak Streets
Scripture Street between Thomas and Jagoe Streets
Hercules Street between N. Locust and Sherman Streets
Windsor Drive between N. Locust and Old North Streets
See Site Location and Exploration Plans
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 2
Item Description
Existing Pavement Asphalt pavements
Planned Construction Full depth asphalt concrete pavements on lime or cement stabilized
subgrade in accordance with City of Denton pavement standards.
Finished grades Match with the existing pavement grades
Pavement Criteria As per the latest City of Denton, Transportation Design Criteria for the
design period of 20 years.
Geology
Geologic Atlas of Texas, published by the Bureau of Economic Geology at the
University of Texas, Austin, indicates that the subject streets are situated
within the outcrop of two geologic formations, the Woodbine Formation and
Grayson Marl and Main Street Limestone, undivided Formation.
The Woodbine is a series of ferruginous, argillaceous sands, laminated clays
some of which are bituminous, ironstone and some gravel. This formation is a
heterogeneous admixture of materials ranging from highly active clays,
through sandy clays and silts, to sand and gravel. Large masses of hard to
very hard sandstone and cemented sand occur within this formation.
Additionally, the type of material encountered may vary widely over very short
distances both laterally and vertically. Sand layers and lenses which are found
throughout the formation tend to serve as aquifers for subsurface runoff.
Grayson Marl and Main Street Limestone, undivided formation consists of
clays, sand and gravel. This formation may have thin interbedded limestone
or marl.
GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION
Subsurface Profile
The geotechnical characterization forms the basis of our geotechnical calculations and evaluation
of site preparation, foundation options and pavement options. As noted in General Comments,
the characterization is based upon widely spaced borings along the roadways and subsurface
conditions differing from what was observed in the borings may be present.
All borings were drilled through existing asphalt pavement. The thickness of the asphalt pavement
varied from 2.5 to 7 inches.
Generally, subsurface conditions encountered in the borings below the asphalt pavement
consisted of gray, tan, orange, brown and dark gray of fat clays (CH), sandy lean clays (CH),
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 3
clayey sand (SC), sand (SP) and gravel. The fat and lean clays have a moderate to high
shrink/swell behavior with moisture changes.
Fill materials consisted of clayey sand (SC), sandy lean clay (CL) and sand and gravel
(intermixed) were encountered in Borings H-10, H-11, S-1, S-4, S-5, T-1, T-3 and W-1 to depths
of 8 inches to the boring termination depths of 2 to 5 feet. The sandy fill materials were loose to
dense and clayey fills were stiff to very stiff in consistency.
Subsurface Profiles for the subject streets are presented separately in Exploration Results
section of this report to illustrate the variation of the subsurface materials encountered in the
borings. Laboratory and field test results are also shown on the subsurface profiles.
Conditions encountered at each boring location are indicated on the individual boring logs shown
in the Exploration Results section and are attached to this report. Stratification boundaries on
the boring logs represent the approximate location of changes in native soil types; in situ, the
transition between materials may be gradual.
Groundwater Conditions
The borings were advanced using dry auger drilling techniques, which allows short-term
groundwater observations to be made while drilling. Groundwater was not observed in the borings
while drilling, and for the short duration the borings could remain open. However, this does not
necessarily mean the borings terminated above groundwater. Due to the low permeability of the clay
soils encountered in the borings, a relatively long period may be necessary for a groundwater level
to develop and stabilize in a borehole. Long term observations in piezometers or observation wells
sealed from the influence of surface water are often required to define groundwater levels in materials
of this type.
Groundwater level fluctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff,
lawn irrigation and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore,
groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be different
than those indicated on the boring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should
be considered when developing the construction plans for the project.
GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW
Asphalt concrete pavement is planned for the proposed roadway reconstruction. The City of
Denton specifications require the pavement subgrade be stabilized with lime for subgrade with
clay soils. For sandy soils, cement stabilization should be used as recommended in this report.
Soluble sulfate test results indicated that the clayey soils are suitable for lime stabilization.
However, during construction phase, field testing using TxDOT Methods TEX-146-E (conductivity
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 4
test for field detection of sulfate in soils) should be used to confirm soluble sulfate concentrations.
TxDOT Method TEX-145-E should then be used to help determine if sulfate concentrations are
less than 3,000 ppm and suitable for lime stabilization. In lieu of lime stabilization, flexible base
materials can be used for subgrade preparation, if the sulfate concentration is higher than 3000
ppm. The flexible base should be the same depth as the lime stabilized depth of 12 inches.
Geotechnical recommendations are presented in the following report sections for earthwork,
pavement subgrade preparation, and pavement design considerations and pavement sections.
The General Comments section provides an understanding of the report limitations.
EARTHWORK
Earthwork will include removal of existing pavements and vegetation in new pavement sections.
The following sections provide recommendations for use in the preparation of specifications for
the work. Recommendations include critical quality criteria as necessary to render the site in the
state considered in our geotechnical engineering evaluation for the reconstruction of the subject
pavements.
Existing Fill Materials
Borings H-10, H-11, S-1, S-4, S-5, T-1, T-3 and W-1 encountered existing fill to depths ranging
from about 8 inches to boring termination depth of 5 feet below grade. The fills were loose to
dense and stiff to very stiff in consistency. The majority of these fills appeared to have been placed
in a controlled manner, but we have no records to indicate the degree of control. Support of
pavements on or above existing fill soils is discussed in this report.
Site Preparation
The pavement areas should be stripped of vegetation if present within the new pavement areas
and removal of existing pavement. The exposed subgrade should be proof rolled prior to placing
any new fill to raise pavement grades.
The proof rolling should be performed with a fully loaded, tandem-axle dump truck or other
equipment providing an equivalent subgrade loading. A minimum gross weight of 20 tons is
recommended for the proof-rolling equipment. The proof rolling should consist of several
overlapping passes in mutually perpendicular directions over a given area. Any soft or pumping
areas should be removed to firm ground. Fill should be uniformly compacted to the criteria
described in Fill Compaction Requirements. It should then be protected and maintained in a
moist condition until the pavement subgrade is stabilized with either lime or cement.
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 5
If the pavement subgrade is disturbed or allowed to desiccate prior to the placement of the
pavement, it should be reworked and properly compacted to the recommendations in this report
immediately prior to paving. The pavement subgrade should be graded to prevent ponding and
infiltration of excessive moisture on or adjacent to the subgrade surface.
Fill Material Types
Fill materials should meet the criteria given below.
Nomenclature Technical Description Appropriate Use
On-site soils
Free of vegetation, organic material, debris, and
rocks dimensions suitable for lime or cement
stabilization. General site grading
Pavement subgrade
Utility trench backfill Imported fill
Clean clay soil (free of deleterious material and
debris) with a liquid limit (LL) less than 50 percent
and no rock greater than 4 inches in maximum
dimension. The imported soils should have soluble
sulfate concentrations of less than 3,000 ppm.
Lime Stabilized
Subgrade TxDOT Item 260
Pavement subgrade Cement Stabilized
Subgrade TxDOT Item 275
Flexible Base TxDOT Item 247, Type D, Grade 1 or 2. Recycled
concrete meeting this gradation is acceptable.
Fill Compaction Requirements
Recommendations for compaction are presented in the following table. We recommend that
engineered fill be tested for moisture content and compaction during placement. Should the
results of the in-place density tests indicate the specified moisture or compaction limits have not
been met, the area represented by the test should be reworked and retested as required until the
specified moisture and compaction requirements are achieved.
Item Description1
Subgrade preparation for fills Surface scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches and
compacted to criteria below.
All fills; loose lift thickness 9 inches or less
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 6
Item Description1
General site fills and utility trench
backfill above pipe bedding
A minimum of 95% maximum standard Proctor dry density
(ASTM D 698) at a minimum of +2 percentage points above
optimum moisture content.
Pavement Subgrade
(lime treated)
A minimum of 95% maximum standard Proctor dry density
(ASTM D 698) in the range of 0 to +3 percentage points of
optimum moisture content.
Pavement Subgrade
(cement treated)
A minimum of 95% maximum standard Proctor dry density
(ASTM D 698) in the range of -2 to +2 percentage points of
optimum moisture content.
Flexible Base
A minimum of 98% maximum standard Proctor dry density
(ASTM D 698) in the range of -2 to +2 percentage points of
optimum moisture content.
1. The compaction criteria should meet or exceeds the requirements of City of Denton
PAVEMENTS
Pavement Subgrade Preparations
Generally, subgrade materials encountered in the borings are expected to consist of fat clays,
sandy lean clays and clayey sands, and sand and gravel (intermixed). These soils are subject to
loss of support with the moisture increases that can occur beneath paving. Lime stabilization is
recommended beneath the pavement sections where clayey soils are present. There are some
locations, such as in Borings H-10, H-11, S-1, S-3, S-4, T-1, T-3, W-1 and W-2, where sandy soils
consisting of clayey sand (SC) and intermixed sand and gravel were encountered within upper 8
inches to boring termination depths of 4 to 5 feet. Cement stabilization is recommended where
sandy soils are present.
Lime application rate should be determined after rough grading. Plasticity Index - Lime series
(PI-LIME Series) test results are performed on 8 clay soil samples obtained beneath the existing
pavement to the boring termination depth of 5 feet. The test results are provided in the
Exploration and Testing Procedures section of this report. The majority of the test results
indicated that the PI of the in-situ soils reduced to 14.5 for mixing of 3 to 9 percentage of lime.
The reduction in PI of one clay soil sample obtained at a depth of 4 to 5 feet in Boring H-9 exhibited
18 for mixing 9 percentage of lime and 16.5 for mixing 11 percentage of lime. Generally, PI of
less than 15 is preferable for lime treated materials for pavement subgrade consisting of clay
soils.
For estimating purposes, based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings and PI-
LIME Series test results, we recommend about 9 percent lime (TxDOT, Item 260) by dry weight
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 7
be used for lime stabilization. The lime should be thoroughly mixed and blended with the top 12
inches to meet city standards of the subgrade. We recommend to perform additional PI-LIME
series tests during construction phase of the project.
Cement stabilization for the pavement subgrade is recommended where clayey sand or sand and
is present along the project alignments. For estimating purposes, we recommend minimum 5
percent cement (TxDOT, Item 275) by dry weight be used. The cement should be thoroughly
mixed and blended with the top 12 inches to meet city standards.
We recommend that lime or cement stabilization be extended a minimum of one foot beyond the
edge of the pavement that will be widened and where curb and gutter is not present. Stabilization
beyond the edge of the streets where existing concrete curb and gutter is present is not required.
Care will be required not to undermine the existing curb and gutter during construction.
Soluble sulfate tests (TxDOT Method, TEX-145-E) were performed on the soils obtained from
depths range of about 4 inches to 5 feet in the borings to determine the concentration of soluble
sulfate. The results were presented in Exploration and Testing Procedures section of this
report. The results indicated that the sulfate concentrations in the range of 40 to 2,440 parts per
million (ppm) were present in the soil samples.
Generally, sulfate concentration less than 3,000 ppm have a low potential of sulfate-induced
heave if lime stabilization is used. Soluble sulfate test results indicated that lime stabilization is
suitable for this project with clayey soils. Additional sulfate tests should be performed during
subgrade preparation prior to mixing of lime for reconfirmation. Our office should be contacted if
sulfate concentration is higher than 3,000 ppm for further recommendations. Field conductivity
test for the detection of sulfates in soils (TxDOT method TEX-146-E) may be used during
construction phase to determine the extent of high sulfate zone. Flexible base materials can be
used for the pavement subgrade in lieu of lime stabilization where lime stabilization is not suitable.
Site grading is generally accomplished early in the construction phase. However, as construction
proceeds, the subgrade may be disturbed due to utility excavations, construction traffic,
desiccation, or rainfall. As a result, the pavement subgrade may not be suitable for pavement
construction and corrective action will be required. The subgrade should be carefully evaluated
at the time of pavement construction for signs of disturbance or excessive rutting. If disturbance
has occurred, pavement subgrade areas should be reworked, moisture conditioned, and properly
compacted to the recommendations in this report immediately prior to paving.
A critical aspect of pavement performance is site preparation. Pavement designs, noted in this
section, must be applied to the site, which has been prepared as recommended in the Earthwork
section.
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 8
Support characteristics of subgrade for pavement design do not account for shrink/swell
movements of an expansive clay subgrade, such as soils encountered on this project. Thus, the
pavement may be adequate from a structural standpoint, yet still experience cracking and
deformation due to shrink/swell related movement of the subgrade.
Microcracking of Cement Stabilized Subgrade
Shrinkage cracking is very common to occur in Cement Stabilized Subgrade (CSS) due to
desiccation and cement hydration. These cracks start to reflect through the asphalt pavement
surface. These cracks open the pavement to water infiltration and increase the likelihood of
accelerated pavement distress.
Microcracking concept can be used to reduce shrinkage cracking in CSS. The goal of
microcracking is to prevent severe, wide cracks from forming and thus reduce the risk of
problematic reflective cracking through the pavement surfacing. Microcracking application
basically helps reduce the amount of shrinkage cracking that typically propagates up through the
asphalt layer overlying CSS. Therefore, we recommend that microcracking be performed before
cement sets up within 24 to 48 hours after initial placement as specified in TxDOT
Specification Item 275.
Generally, microcracking involves making several passes over a newly constructed CSS with a
heavy roller to induce a network of cracks through the layers. Microcracking the CSS with a steel-
wheel smooth drum vibratory roller after 1 to 2 days cure, combined with a minimum 3-day moist
cure period could reduce the severity of cracking in the completed asphalt pavement, i.e. crack
width and total crack length. The roller used for microcracking should be similar or equivalent to the
vibratory steel roller used for compaction.
Pavement Design Parameters
At the time of this report preparation no traffic volume (traffic study) was available for pavement
analysis. Asphaltic concrete pavement is planned for this project.
We understand that the pavement section will be constructed to conform City of Denton pavement
Criteria Manual - March 20
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 9
Pavement Section Thicknesses
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION1
Pavement Section Residential
Collector, inches
All Other
Residential, inches
Commercial
Collector, inches
Asphaltic Surface
(TxDOT Item 340, Type C) 3 2 3
Asphalt Base Course
(TxDOT Item 340, Type B) 6 6 9
Lime or Cement Stabilized Subgrade
(TxDOT Item 260 or 275) 12 12 12
Note: 1. Pavement should be constructed to conform or exceeds the requirements of City of Denton
is available to us.
GENERAL COMMENTS
As the project progresses, we address assumptions by incorporating information provided by the
design team, if any. Revised project information that reflects actual conditions important to our
services is reflected in the final report. The design team should collaborate with Terracon to
confirm these assumptions and to prepare the final design plans and specifications. This facilitates
the incorporation of our opinions related to implementation of our geotechnical recommendations.
Any information conveyed prior to the final report is for informational purposes only and should
not be considered or used for decision-making purposes.
Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical
conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variations will occur
between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather.
The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction.
Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in the final report, to
provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations
appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are
noted in the absence of our observation and testing services on-site, we should be immediately
notified so that we can provide evaluation and supplemental recommendations.
Our scope of services does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or
biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable 10
pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for
such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken.
Our services and any correspondence or collaboration through this system are intended for the
sole benefit and exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and
are accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices with
no third party beneficiaries intended. Any third party access to services or correspondence is
solely for information purposes to support the services provided by Terracon to our client. Reliance
upon the services and any work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for third parties.
Any use or reliance of the provided information by third parties is done solely at their own risk. No
warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made.
Site characteristics as provided are for design purposes and not to estimate excavation cost. Any
use of our report in that regard is done at the sole risk of the excavating cost estimator as there
may be variations on the site that are not apparent in the data that could significantly impact
excavation cost. Any parties charged with estimating excavation costs should seek their own site
characterization for specific purposes to obtain the specific level of detail necessary for costing.
Site safety, and cost estimating including, excavation support, and dewatering
requirements/design are the responsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location
of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid
unless we review the changes and either verify or modify our conclusions in writing.
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENTS
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable
EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES
Field Exploration
The field exploration program consisted of the following:
Borings Boring Depth1 Planned Location
H-1 through H-12 5 feet Hercules Lane
(between N. Locust and Sherman Streets)
S-1 through S-6 4 to 5 feet Scripture Street
(between Thomas and Jagoe Streets)
T-1 through T-5 2 to 5 feet Thomas Street
(between Panhandle and Oak Streets
W-1 through W-5 5 feet Windsor Drive
(between N. Locust and Old North Street)
Note: 1. Due to presence of possible utilities near the borings, some of the borings terminated at depths
shallower than 5 feet
Boring Layout: Boring locations are provided on Site Location and Exploration Plan and
Boring Location Plan. Approximate latitudes and longitudes of the borings drilled were obtained
using GPS device. The boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the methods employed to determine them. The elevations were obtained from available
Google Earth map. If elevations and a more precise boring layout are desired, we recommend
borings be surveyed.
Subsurface Exploration Procedures: The borings were drilled on September 17, 18 and 19,
2018 using a truck-mounted drill rig. Continuous soil samples were obtained up to 2 to 5 feet in
the borings. Samples were obtained using push tube and split spoon samplers. Upon the
completion of drilling, the boreholes were backfilled with soil cuttings, and the surface of boreholes
were patched with asphalt. Observations for groundwater was made while drilling and at the
completion of drilling.
Laboratory Testing
The following laboratory tests were performed to better understand the engineering properties of
the various soil strata.
Moisture Content of Soil
Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
Percent passing No. 200 sieve on soils
Soluble Sulfate test on soils
Plasticity Index - Lime series (PI - LIME Series) tests (5 points) on soils
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable
Soil samples were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).
Our laboratory procedures will follow applicable ASTM/TxDOT standards.
Based
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The results of the laboratory tests
are presented on the boring logs presented in Exploration Results of this report. The Unified
Soil Classification System (USCS) is presented in Supporting Information.
Several soluble sulfate tests (TEX-145-E Method) were performed to measure the concentration of
sulfates. The results are presented in the following table:
Boring
No.
Depth
(feet)
Liquid
Limit,
(%)
Plasticity
Index
(%)
Material Description Concentration of
Sulfate, ppm
H-1 0.4-2 40 23 Gray sandy lean clay (CL) 126
H-2 2-4 52 35 Gray fat clay (CH) 106
H-3 1-3 57 38 Gray fat clay (CH) 72
H-4 0.5-2 79 44 Tan fat clay (CH) 200
H-5 2-4 68 43 Brown fat clay (CH) 432
H-6 0.3-2 55 35 Gray fat clay (CH) 80
H-7 2-4 78 49 Brown and orange fat clay (CH) 232
H-8 0.4-2 69 46 Gray and brown fat clay (CH) 86
H-9 4-5 61 45 Orange, tan and gray fat clay (CH) 192
H-10 0.3-2 57 37 Orange fat clay (CH) 120
H-11 1.5-3 56 39 Gray fat clay (CH) 2,440
H-12 2-4 70 48 Gray fat clay (CH) 106
S-1 0.2-2 30 16 Orange clayey sand (SC) 40
S-2 0.5-2 66 48 Orange and tan fat clay (CH) 320
S-3 2-4 36 23 Tan clayey sand (SC) 220
S-6 2-4 53 39 Orange fat clay (CH) 72
T-1 0.3-2 39 24 Tan clayey sand (SC) 306
T-2 0.3-2 43 28 Orange sandy lean clay (CL) 172
T-3 1-2 - - Tan sand and gravel (GP) 126
T-4 0.3-2 40 25 Tan and orange sandy lean clay (CL) 52
T-5 4-5 - - Gray sandy lean clay (CL)- 126
W-1 2-4 54 33 Gray and tan clayey sand (SC) 380
W-2 0.5-2 48 30 Gray clayey sand (SC) 106
W-3 2-4 53 38 Gray and orange fat clay (CH) 106
W-4 2-4 52 34 Tan and gray fat clay (CH) 592
W-5 0.5-2 59 42 Gray and tan fat clay (CH) 92
Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
Responsive Resourceful Reliable
Eight Plasticity Index-Lime series (PI - LIME Series) tests were performed to estimate the minimum
percentage of lime to be mixed to reduce the plasticity index of the soils during pavement subgrade
preparations. The test results are attached with this report.
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring H-1, 0 to 2 ft.0 to 2 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/17/18
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Gray Sandy Lean Clay (CL)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring H-3 1 to 3 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Gray Fat Clay (CH)
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/17/18
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring H-4 2 to 4 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/17/18
Tan Fat Clay (CH)
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring H-9 4 to 5 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Orange, tan and gray Fat Clay (CH)
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/17/18
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring S-2 0 to 2 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Orange and tan Fat Clay (CH) with clayey sand seams
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/18/18
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring S-5 0 to 2 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Fill, Brown Sandy Lean Clay (CL)
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/18/18
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
012345678910111213141516
17
1819
2021
22
23242526272829303132333435
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring T-2 0 to 2 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/18/18
Orange Sandy Lean Clay (CL)
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
PLASTICITY INDEX LIME SERIES TEST
Report No.:
Project No.:
Project:
SAMPLE LOCATION:Boring W-2 0 to 2 ft.
SOIL DESCRIPTION:
PREPARATION:
Gray Clayey Sand (SC)
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc.
Sample Depth:
ASTM D 4318
94185267
94185267
City of Denton Street Improvements
09/19/18
This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced in full without written approval of Terracon.
Sample Date:
Client:
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
0
1
23
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
12
1314
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
% LIME
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100Dallas, TX 75247(214) 630-1010 Reg No.: F-3272
SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS
SITE LOCATION, EXPLORATION AND
BORING LOCATION PLANS
STUART ROADREDSTONE ROADSTUART ROADBUCKINGHAM DR
BRADLEY STREETSTUART ROADMARIETTA STREET
BRADLEY STREET
STUART ROAD
T-1
T-2
T-3
T-4
T-5
DIAGRAM IF FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND ISNOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
BORING LOCATION PLAN - THOMAS STREET
City of Denton Street Improvements ••••Denton, Texas
October 8, 2018 ••••Terracon Project No. 94185267
EXPLORATION RESULTS
EXPLORATION RESULTS
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
3
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
City of Denton City Street Improvements Denton, Texas
November 9, 2018 Terracon Project No. 94185267.1
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A
Soil Classification
Group
Symbol Group Name B
Coarse-Grained Soils:
More than 50% retained
on No. 200 sieve
Gravels:
More than 50% of
coarse fraction
retained on No. 4 sieve
Clean Gravels:
Less than 5% fines C
Cu 4 and 1 Cc 3 E GW Well-graded gravel F
Cu 4 and/or 1 Cc 3 E GP Poorly graded gravel F
Gravels with Fines:
More than 12% fines C
Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F, G, H
Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel F, G, H
Sands:
50% or more of coarse
fraction passes No. 4
sieve
Clean Sands:
Less than 5% fines D
Cu 6 and 1 Cc 3 E SW Well-graded sand I
Cu 6 and/or 1 Cc 3 E SP Poorly graded sand I
Sands with Fines:
More than 12% fines D
Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G, H, I
Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G, H, I
Fine-Grained Soils:
50% or more passes the
No. 200 sieve
Silts and Clays:
Liquid limit less than 50
Inorganic: PI
J
CL Lean clay K, L, M
PI J ML Silt K, L, M
Organic: Liquid limit - oven dried 0.75 OL Organic clay K, L, M, N
Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K, L, M, O
Silts and Clays:
Liquid limit 50 or more
Inorganic: CH Fat clay K, L, M
MH Elastic Silt K, L, M
Organic: Liquid limit - oven dried 0.75 OH Organic clay K, L, M, P
Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K, L, M, Q
Highly organic soils: Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat
A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve
B
C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded
gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly
graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay.
D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded
sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded
sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
E Cu = D60/D10 Cc =
6010
2
30
DxD
)(D
F If soil contains
G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM.
H
I If soil contains
J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay.
K If soil
L If soil contains 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add
M If soil contains 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add
group name.
N PI
O PI
P
Q
Level A Test Holes
Pape Dawson Street
Reconstruction
Denton, Texas
March 14, 2019
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
5700 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 1000
Plano, TX 75093
(214) 440-3600
TBPE Registration No. F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:3625
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 01
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:E SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner DME Field Technicians:BL JK
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/20/2019 Weather:SUNNY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:3.5
B Surface Elevation:668.96
C Top of Utility Elevation:665.46
D Utility Material Type:PVC
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):4
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):6
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
01 81045 7143007.39 2387538.07 668.96
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:3625
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 02
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:UNK SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner UNK Field Technicians:BL JK
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/20/2019 Weather:SUNNY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:3.33
B Surface Elevation:659.5
C Top of Utility Elevation:656.17
D Utility Material Type:STL
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):UNK
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):6
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
02 81046 7142979.89 2389295.10 659.50
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:3625
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 04
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:FOC SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner ATT Field Technicians:BL JP
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/26/2019 Weather:SUNNY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:5.05
B Surface Elevation:693.96
C Top of Utility Elevation:688.91
D Utility Material Type:PE
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):UNK
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):- -
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
5/8"IR W/ CAP
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
04 81054 7130084.99 2380431.37 693.96
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:9991
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 06
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:FOC SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner FRONTIER Field Technicians:JP AJ
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/21/2019 Weather:CLOUDY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:2.92
B Surface Elevation:734.97
C Top of Utility Elevation:732.05
D Utility Material Type:PE
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):1.5
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):5
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
06 81053 7130062.18 2379043.44 734.97
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:9991
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 07
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:FOC SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner ATT Field Technicians:JP AJ
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/21/2019 Weather:RAIN
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:3.28
B Surface Elevation:736.62
C Top of Utility Elevation:733.34
D Utility Material Type:PVC
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):UNK
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):7
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
07 81052 7130114.96 2379011.53 736.62
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:3625
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 08
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:FOC SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner VERIZON Field Technicians:BL JK
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/21/2019 Weather:CLOUDY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:1.76
B Surface Elevation:641.88
C Top of Utility Elevation:640.12
D Utility Material Type:PE
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):1.5
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):12
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
08 81048 7139078.58 2391979.51 641.88
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:9991
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 10
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:FOC SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner DENTON FIBER Field Technicians:JK AJ
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/21/2019 Weather:CLOUDY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:3.56
B Surface Elevation:640.2
C Top of Utility Elevation:636.64
D Utility Material Type:PE
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):1.5
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):8
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
10 81047 7139568.64 2389955.09 640.20
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:3625
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 11
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:FOC SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner VERIZON Field Technicians:BL JK
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/21/2019 Weather:RAIN
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:1.43
B Surface Elevation:640.24
C Top of Utility Elevation:638.81
D Utility Material Type:PE
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):1.5
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):12
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
11 81049 7139119.32 2391998.28 640.24
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:9991
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 13
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:FOC SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner VERIZON Field Technicians:JP AJ
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/20/2019 Weather:SUNNY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:2.04
B Surface Elevation:615.22
C Top of Utility Elevation:613.18
D Utility Material Type:PE
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):1.5
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):8
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
PAINT
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
13 81050 7140250.34 2394946.87 615.22
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
LSE Project No.:B200505.10 Vacuum Truck No.:9991
TEST HOLE DATA FORM
TH 14
PROJECT NAME:2019 - Street Reconstruction
TEST HOLE DATA TEST HOLE SECTION (NTS)
Utility Type:E SUE Field Manager:Hendricks
Utility Owner DME Field Technicians:JP AJ
5700 W. Plano Pkwy, Suite 1000, Plano, TX 75093 Date Completed:02/20/2019 Weather:SUNNY
Approximate Station: N/A Offset: N/A
A Depth to Top of Utility:3.72
B Surface Elevation:613.27
C Top of Utility Elevation:609.55
D Utility Material Type:PVC
TEST HOLE
E Outside Diameter of Utility (Inches):2.5
F Existing Pavement Thickness (Inches):- -
SHOT POINT NORTHING EASTING SURFACE ELEV
5/8"IR W/ CAP
DESCRIPTION NUMBER (Y) (X) (Z) MARKER
14 81051 7140224.26 2395378.68 613.27
Checked By:DWSLSE Project Manager D. Smith Completed By: RFL
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
TBPE Firm No.: F-9073
20
Level A Test Holes
Pape Dawson-Street Reconstruction
Denton, Texas
March 20, 2019
Lamb-Star Engineering, LP
5700 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 1000
Plano, TX 75093
(214) 440-3600
TBPE Registration No. F-9073