Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Exhibit 2 - Evaluation Sheets
Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Nelson + Morgan Architects Inc.1 82 9 16 20 20 9 8 CaCo Architecture LLC 2 81.67 8 16 20 22 8 8 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.3 71 7 15 18 17 7 7 VAI Architects 4 65 7 15 18 13 6 6 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.5 52.33 7 13 12 10 5 5 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Airport Facilities Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Martinez Architects 1 92.33 8 17 23 25 10 9 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.2 83.33 8 16 20 23 8 8 VAI Architects 3 82.67 7 16 20 23 8 8 Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 4 81.67 8 16 20 22 8 8 Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 5 69 7 15 18 17 5 7 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.6 65 7 15 17 15 5 7 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Fire Stations Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Architexas 1 93.67 9 17 23 25 9 9 Bennett Benner Partners 2 74.00 7 15 18 18 9 7 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Historic Preservation Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.1 83.33 8 16 20 23 8 8 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.2 69.33 8 15 18 15 6 7 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Landscape Achitecture Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives 720 Design Inc.1 91.33 9 17 22 25 9 9 Steinberg Hart 2 84.67 8 16 20 23 9 9 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.3 80.00 8 16 18 22 8 8 Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 4 67.33 7 15 18 15 5 7 Architexas 5 51.67 7 11 13 12 4 5 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Libraries Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives CaCo Architecture LLC 1 83.33 9 16 20 20 7 8 Quorum Architects, inc.2 82.67 9 16 20 20 7 8 Nelson + Morgan Architects Inc.3 82.33 8 16 20 18 7 8 Bennett Benner Partners 4 82.00 7 16 20 18 7 7 VAI Architects 5 81.00 7 16 20 18 7 7 720 design Inc.6 80.00 7 16 20 18 7 7 Elements Of Architecture 7 80.00 7 16 20 18 7 7 Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 8 77.67 8 16 18 18 7 7 BVG4 Architecture LLC 9 76.33 6 15 17 18 7 8 GPF Architects, LLC 10 76.33 7 16 20 18 7 7 Grace Hebert Curtis Architects 11 76.33 7 16 20 18 7 7 Steinberg Hart 12 76.33 7 16 20 18 7 7 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.13 75.33 8 16 18 18 7 7 Amtech Solutions Inc 14 71.00 6 15 17 18 7 8 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Other Architectural Services Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.1 85.67 8 16 20 25 9 8 CaCo Architecture LLC 2 85.00 8 16 20 25 8 8 Elements Of Architecture 3 83.00 9 16 20 22 9 8 Bennett Benner Partners 4 81.67 8 16 20 22 8 8 Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 5 72.00 7 15 18 18 6 7 Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 6 70.00 7 15 18 15 7 7 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.7 67.67 7 15 15 17 7 7 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Parks and Recreation Facilities Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Grace Hebert Curtis Architects 1 89.33 8 17 22 25 9 9 BVG4 Architecture LLC 2 86.00 9 17 22 22 9 8 Elements Of Architecture 3 83.00 9 16 20 22 9 8 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.4 68.67 7 15 18 15 7 7 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.5 63.33 7 13 17 13 6 7 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Police Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 1 84.33 8 16 20 25 7 8 Elements Of Architecture 2 83.67 9 16 20 22 9 9 Nelson + Morgan Architects Inc.3 83.00 9 16 20 22 9 8 BWA Architects 4 82.67 7 16 20 23 8 8 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.5 81.67 8 16 20 22 8 8 Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 6 73.33 7 15 18 18 7 7 GPF Architects, LLC 7 64.67 6 15 18 15 5 6 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.8 63.33 7 15 15 15 5 7 BVG4 Architecture LLC 9 63.33 7 13 17 13 6 7 CaCo Architecture LLC 10 62.67 7 15 20 10 5 6 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 1 85.00 8 16 20 25 7 9 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.2 81.00 8 16 20 22 7 8 VAI Architects 3 81.00 7 16 20 22 7 9 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.4 67.33 7 15 18 15 6 6 Bennett Benner Partners 5 65.00 7 15 17 15 6 6 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Site Master Planning Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives VAI Architects 1 85.00 7 16 20 25 8 9 Nelson + Morgan Architects Inc.2 84.67 9 16 20 23 9 8 Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 3 84.33 8 16 20 25 7 8 Elements Of Architecture 4 83.00 9 16 20 22 9 8 Quorum Architects, inc.5 82.00 7 16 20 23 7 8 Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 6 71.67 7 15 18 17 7 7 CaCo Architecture LLC 7 70.00 7 15 18 15 7 7 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.8 65.33 7 15 17 13 7 7 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.9 61.67 7 13 17 12 6 7 BVG4 Architecture LLC 10 55.00 7 12 13 12 5 7 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Fleet Maintenance Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Elements Of Architecture 1 86.00 20 8 23 9 8 17 CaCo Architecture LLC 2 83.67 20 8 22 9 8 17 Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 3 83.33 20 8 23 8 8 16 Nelson + Morgan Architects Inc.4 83.00 20 9 22 9 8 16 VAI Architects 5 82.67 20 7 23 8 8 16 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.6 80.33 18 8 23 7 8 16 BWA Architects 7 80.33 20 7 22 8 8 16 Bennett Benner Partners 8 70.67 18 7 18 7 7 13 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.9 68.67 18 7 15 7 7 15 Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 10 68.33 18 7 17 6 7 13 Steinberg Hart 11 66.33 17 7 15 7 7 15 Grace Hebert Curtis Architects 12 64.33 17 7 15 6 7 13 GPF Architects, LLC 13 60.67 17 6 13 5 7 13 Architexas 14 57.67 15 8 10 6 7 12 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Offices Supplier Rank Score Firm Overview & Desired Project Types Proposed Team for this Project Type Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for this Project Type Example Projects Information Provided by the Firm in Appendix Overall Fit of this Team with City Goals & Objectives Elements Of Architecture 1 86.00 9 16 20 23 9 9 CaCo Architecture LLC 2 84.67 9 16 20 23 8 9 720 design inc 3 83.33 9 16 20 23 7 8 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper Inc.4 83.33 8 16 20 23 8 8 Nelson + Morgan Architects Inc.5 82.33 9 16 20 22 8 8 VAI Architects 6 81.00 7 16 20 22 8 8 Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 7 70.00 7 15 18 15 7 7 Steinberg Hart 8 67.33 7 15 18 15 6 7 Oxley Williams Tharp Architects 9 66.33 7 15 18 13 6 7 Brandstetter Carroll Inc.10 63.33 7 13 17 13 6 7 Architexas 11 56.67 7 13 15 8 6 7 Exhibit 2 RFQ 7818 - Evaluation Sheet for Architectural Pre-Qualified List - Facilities