Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-017E \WPDOCS\ORD\FLOOD PRO ORDINANCE NO "O� 7 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS SECTION I That the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and the Texas Water Development Board for flood protection planning SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval PASSED AND APPROVED this the lvt� day of 1996 ATTEST JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY AP?VEDXAS TO LEGAL FORM HERBERT L PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY �� c STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS TWDB Contract No 96-483-157 Research and Planning Fund Flood Protection Planning THIS CONTRACT, (hereinafter "CONTRACT'), between the Texas Water Development Board (hereinafter "BOARD") and the City of Denton (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR(S)"), is composed of two parts, Section I Specific conditions and exceptions to the standard agreement and Section II Standard Agreement The terms and conditions set forth in Section I will take precedence over terms and conditions in Section II SECTION I SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Contract, the following terms or phrases shall have the meaning ascribed therewith A BOARD - The Texas Water Development Board, or its designated representative B CONTRACTOR(S) - City of Denton C EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR - The Executive Administrator of the Board or his designated representative D PARTICIPANT(S) - None E REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(S) - None F BOARD APPROVAL DATE - October 19, 1995 G PLANNING AREA - The City of Denton which contains the Cooper Creek watershed and the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed H DEADLINE FOR CONTRACT EXECUTION - January 18, 1996 1 CONTRACT INITIATION DATE - October 19, 1995 J STUDY COMPLETION DATE - September 30, 1996 K FINAL REPORT DEADLINE - November 30, 1996 L TOTAL STUDY COSTS - $97,980 M BOARD SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS - Not to exceed $48,990 or 50 percent of the total study costs or individual voucher submission N LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS - $48,990 in cash and $0 in in - kind services 0 VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE - Monthly P OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT OF THIS CONTRACT - ■ Coordination with Denton County and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) ■ Scope of work will not contain Phase III of Task I (preliminary design) of the original application with the exception of Item F IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Contract to be duly executed in multiple onginals THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD Tommy Kno s Deputy Ex utive Administrator of Planning Date THE CO CTOR(S) -- 1 9" Z� Rick Svehla City Manager City of Denton Date ( "/?-% ARTICLE II CORRESPONDENCE All correspondence between the parties shall be made to the following addresses For the BOARD For the CONTRACTOR(S) Mr Craig D Pedersen Mr Jerry A Clark Executive Administrator Director of Engineering and Transportation Texas Water Development Board 215 McKinney Street P O Box 13231, Capitol Station Denton, TX 76201 Austin, Texas 78711-3231 Attention Regional Planning and Protects Section SECTION II STANDARD AGREEMENT ARTICLE I RECITALS Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) applied to the BOARD, Austin, Texas for a planning grant to develop a Flood protection plan, Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) and PARTICIPANT(S) will commit cash and/or in -kind services to pay for the local share of this planning project, Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) Is the entity who will act as administrator of the BOARD's planning grant and will be responsible for the execution of this contract, Whereas, on the BOARD APPROVAL DATE, the BOARD approved the CONTRACTOR(S)'s application for financial assistance, Now, therefore, the BOARD and the CONTRACTOR(S), agree as follows ADTIrI F 11 DDn_IFr:T nrQrDIDTIn necessary by either the BOARD or the CONTRACTOR(S) to discuss the status of the flood protection plan The CONTRACTOR(S) will solicit input and comments from the affected public on the draft final report and consider such input and comments for incorporation in the final report ARTICLE III SCHEDULE, REPORTS, AND OTHER PRODUCTS The CONTRACTOR(S) has until the DEADLINE FOR CONTRACT EXECUTION to execute this Contract and to provide acceptable evidence of REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS and the CONTRACTOR(S) ability to provide the LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR or approval of the BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS will be rescinded The term of this Contract shall begin and the CONTRACTOR(S) shall begin performing its obligations hereunder on the BOARD APPROVAL DATE and shall expire on the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE Delivery of an acceptable final report pnor to the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE shall constitute completion of the terms of this Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) will complete the Scope of Work and will deliver seven (7) double -sided copies of a draft final report to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR no later than the STUDY COMPLETION DATE The draft final report will include the methodology and findings of the study, including alternatives considered, cost estimates, recommended alternatives, an implementation plan and schedule, recommended entities to implement the recommended alternatives, appropriate financing mechanisms, and other pertinent information After a 30-day review period, review comments will be returned by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR to the CONTRACTOR(S) 4 The CONTRACTOR(S) will consider incorporating comments from the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR and other commentors on the draft final report into a final report The CONTRACTOR(S) will include a copy of the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR's comments in the final report The CONTRACTOR(S) will submit one (1) unbound camera ready original and nine (9) bound double -sided copies of the final report to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR no later than the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE The CONTRACTOR(S) will submit one (1) electronic copy of any computer programs or models and an operations manual developed under the terms of this Contract 5 The CONTRACTOR(S) will submit progress reports with submittal of vouchers according to the VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE Progress reports shall be in written form and shall include a brief statement of the overall progress made since the last status report, a brief description of any problems that have been encountered during the previous reporting period that will affect the study, delay the timely completion of any portion of this Contract, inhibit the completion of or cause a change in any of the study's products or objectives, and a description of any action the CONTRACTOR(S) plans to take to correct any problems that have been encountered The COMPLETION DATE and the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE can be extended upon written approval by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR The CONTRACTOR(S) should notify the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR in writing within ten (10) working days prior to the COMPLETION DATE or thirty (30) days prior to the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE that the CONTRACTOR(S) is requesting an extension to the respective dates 4 ARTICLE IV COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT The BOARD agrees to compensate and reimburse the CONTRACTOR(S) in a total amount not to exceed the BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS for costs incurred and paid by the CONTRACTOR(S) pursuant to performance of this Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) will contribute local matching funds in sources and amounts defined as the LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS The BOARD shall reimburse the CONTRACTOR(S) for ninety percent (90%) of the BOARD's share of each invoice pending the CONTRACTOR(S)'s performance, completion of a Final Report, and written acceptance of said Final Report by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR, at which time the BOARD shall pay the retained ten percent (10%) to the CONTRACTOR(S) The CONTRACTOR(S) shall submit vouchers and documentation for reimbursement billing according to the VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE and in accordance with the approved task and expense budgets contained in Exhibit C to this Contract At the discretion of the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR and upon written memorandum to the contract file, the CONTRACTOR(S) has budget flexibility within task and expense budget categories to the extent that the resulting change in amount in any one category does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total amount authorized by this Contract Larger deviations shall require a formal contract amendment For all reimbursement billings including any subcontractor's expenses, the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR must have provided written approval of REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(S) and contracts or agreements between the CONTRACTOR(S) and the subcontractor The CONTRACTOR(S) is fully responsible for paying all charges by subcontractors prior to reimbursement by the BOARD 3 The CONTRACTOR(S) and its subcontractors shall maintain satisfactory financial accounting documents and records, including copies of invoices and receipts, and shall make them available for examination and audit by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR Accounting by the CONTRACTOR(S) and its subcontractors shall be in a manner consistent with generally accepted accounting principles 4 A progress report and the following documentation which documents the TOTAL STUDY COSTS for reimbursement by the BOARD to the CONTRACTOR(S) for the BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS shall be submitted by the CONTRACTOR(S) to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR for reimbursement billing A Summary of total expenses incurred including the following information (1) Contractor's Vendor Identification Number, (2) TWDB Contract Number, (3) Total expenses for the billing period, beginning (date) to ending (date), (4) Total In -kind services, (5) Total Services for this period, (6) Less Local Share of the total study costs for the billing period, (7) Total BOARD's share of the total study costs for the billing penod, (8) Amount of retainage to be withheld for the billing period, (9) Total costs to be reimbursed by the BOARD for the billing period, and (10) Certification, signed by the CONTRACTOR(S) authorized representative, that the expenses submitted for the billing period are a true and correct representation of amounts paid for work performed directly related to this contract B ,Total payment due for a billing period shall be separated by State Fiscal Year (e g , through August 31, 1995 for State Fiscal Year 1995 and beginning September 1, 1995 for State Fiscal Year 1996) Supporting information shall also be separated by State Fiscal Year If a voucher is submitted that requests payment on services performed in more than one Fiscal Year, a breakdown per Fiscal Year shall be included, C For direct expenses incurred by the CONTRACTOR($) for outside consulting services -- copies of invoices to the CONTRACTOR(S) showing the tasks that were performed, the percent and cost of each task completed, a total cost figure for each direct expense category including labor, fringe, overhead, travel, communication and postage, technical and computer services, expendable supplies, printing and reproduction, and the total dollar amount due to the consultant, and D For travel and subsistence expenses, including such expenses for subcontractors -- (1) names, dates, work locations, time penods at work locations, itemization of subsistence expenses of each employee, limited, however, to travel expenses authorized for state employees by the General Appropriations Act, Tex Law Regular Session, 1995, Art IX, Sec 12 through 18, at IX43 or as amended or superseded, (2) other transportation costs -- copies of invoices covering tickers for transportation or, if not available, names, dates, and points of travel of individuals, and (3) all other reimbursable expenses -- invoices or purchase vouchers showing reason for expense with receipts to evidence the amount incurred ARTICLE V OWNERSHIP, PUBLICATION, AND SUBCONTRACTING The BOARD shall have unlimited rights to technical or other data resulting directly from the performance of services under this Contract It is agreed that all reports, drafts of reports, or other material, data, drawings, computer programs and codes associated with this Contract and developed by the CONTRACTOR(S) or its subcontractors pursuant to this Contract shall become the joint property of the CONTRACTOR(S) and the BOARD These materials shall not be copyrighted or patented by the CONTRACTOR(S) or by any consultants involved in this Contract unless the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR approves in writing the right to establish copyright or patent, provided, however, that copyrighting or patenting by the CONTRACTOR(S) or its subcontractors mall in no way limit the BOARD's access to or right to request and receive or distribute data and information obtained or developed pursuant to this Contract Any material subject to a BOARD copyright and produced by the CONTRACTOR(S) or BOARD pursuant to this Contract may be printed by the CONTRACTOR(S) or the BOARD at their own cost and distributed by either at their discretion The CONTRACTOR(S) may otherwise utilize such material provided under this Contract as it deems necessary and appropnete, including the right to publish and distribute the materials or any parts thereof under its own name, provided that any BOARD copyright is appropriately noted on the printed materials 2 The CONTRACTOR(S) agrees to acknowledge the BOARD in any news releases or other publications relating to the work performed under this Contract 3 No work herein called for by the CONTRACTOR(S) shall be reimbursed for expenses by the BOARD to the CONTRACTOR(S) without prior written approval by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR of the contract or agreement between the CONTRACTOR(S) and its subcontractor Each subcontract or agreement shall include a detailed budget estimate with specific cost details for each task or specific item of work to be performed by the subcontractor and for each category of reimbursable expenses The subcontracts shall conform to the terms of the Contract and include provisions which require subcontractor compliance with BOARD rules + The CONTRACTOR(S) must also adhere to all requirements in state law pertaining to the procurement of professional services ARTICLE IVI AMENDMENT, TERMINATION, AND STOP ORDERS This Contract may be altered or amended by mutual written consent or terminated by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR at any time by written notice to the CONTRACTOR(S) Upon receipt of such termination notice, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, immediately discontinue all work in connection with the performance of this Contract and shall proceed to cancel promptly all existing orders insofar as such orders are chargeable to this Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) shall submit a statement showing in detail the work performed under this Contract to the date of termination The BOARD shall then pay the CONTRACTOR(S) promptly that proportion of the prescribed fee which applies to the work actually performed under this Contract, less all payments that have been previously made Thereupon, copies of all work accomplished under this Contract shall be delivered to the BOARD The EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR may issue a Stop Work Order to the CONTRACTOR(S) at any time Upon receipt of such order, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall discontinue all work under this Contract and cancel all orders pursuant to this Contract, unless the order directs otherwise If the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR does not issue a Restart Order within 60 days after receipt by the CONTRACTOR(S) of the Stop Work Order, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall regard this Contract terminated in accordance with the foregoing provisions ARTICLE VII NO DEBT AGAINST THE STATE This Contract and Agreement shall not be construed as creating any debt by or on behalf of the State of Texas and the BOARD, and all obligations of the State of Texas are subject to the availability of funds To the extent the performance of this Contract transcends the biennium in which this Contract is entered into, this Contract is specifically contingent upon the continued authority of the BOARD and appropriations therefore ARTICLE VIII LICENSES, PERMIT, AND INSURANCE For the purpose of this Contract, the CONTRACTOR(S) will be considered an independent contractor and therefore solely responsible for liability resulting from negligent acts or omissions The CONTRACTOR(S) shall obtain all necessary insurance, in the judgement of the CONTRACTOR(S), to protect themselves, the BOARD, and employees and officials of the BOARD from liability arising out of this Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) shall indemnify and hold the BOARD and the State of Texas harmless, to the extent the CONTRACTOR(S) may do so in accordance with state law, from any and all loses, damages, liability, or claims therefore, on account of personal injury, death, or property damage of any nature whatsoever caused by the CONTRACTOR(S), arising out of the activities under this Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) shall be solely and entirely responsible for procuring all appropriate licenses and permits which may be required by any competent authority for the CONTRACTOR(S) to perform the subject work ARTICLE IX SEVERANCE PROVISION Should any one or more provisions of this Contract be held to be null, void, voidable, or for any reason whatsoever, of no force and effect, such provision(s) shall be construed as severable from the remainder of this Contract and shall not affect the validity of all other provisions of this Contract which shall remain of full force and effect EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK (Page B-1 to B-6 of Original Grant Application) 10 EXHIBIT C TASK BUDGET Cooper Creek Re tonal Detention Stud TASK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 Reconnaissance and data collection $3162 00 2 Conceptual Evaluation $20,07000 3 t Prepare information for CLOMR Request $1,706 00 4 Other Expenses $27,95600 Total $52 904 00 Pecan Creek Flow Diversion Mitigation Study TASK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 Reconnaissance and data oollectlon $3,242 00 2 Preliminary Design $23,49700 3 Other Expenses $18.337 00 Total 1 1 V16.076 00 EXPENSE BUDGET CATEGORY TOTAL AMOUNT Freese and Nichols, Inc Survey Subconsultant Geotechnical Subconsultant A Salaries & Wages' $15,199 $8 504 $6,729 B Fringe' $7,361 $1,486 $1316 C Travel $188 $300 $250 D Expendable Supplies $0 $150 $150 E Subcontract Services $100,825 $37,363 $0 $0 F Tech /Comp Svcs $3,823 $2 500 $3,000 G Communications $174 $100 $100 H Reproduction $343 $0 $0 1 Overhead $17,345 $3,508 $3,105 J Profit $,16,184 $3,270 $2,895 TOTAL $97,980 00 $19,818 00 $17 545 00 11 ' Salanes and Waaes is defined as the cost of salaries of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers, surveymen clerks, laborers etc for time directly chargeable to this contract Fnnae is defined as the cost of social security contributions, unemployment, excise, and payroll taxes, employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and holiday pay applicable thereto Overhead is defined as the costs incurred in maintaining a place of business and performing professional services similar to those specified in this contract These costs shall Include the follownng • Indirect salaries, including that portion of the salary of principals and executives that is allocable to general supervision, • Indirect salary fringe benefits, • Accounting and legal services related to normal management and business operations, • Travel costs incurred in the normal course of overall administration of the business, • Equipment rental, • Depreciation of furniture, fixtures, equipment, and vehicles, • Dues, subscriptions, and fees associated with trade, business, technical, and professional organizations, • Other insurance, • Rent and utilities, and • Repairs and maintenance of furniture, fixtures, and equipment 12 - z�iaii ;ass ` - [14;3 rR, i A r i , r i i I i a 1 # s` � 1 I r � 1 0 i � r I I Ir f 1 r APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT FOR COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND AND PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY Prepared for THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS by FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC AUGUST 1995 FREESE - NICHOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION II PLANNING INFORMATION III WRITTEN ASSURANCES IV PROOF OF NOTIFICATION EXHIBIT A - Planning Area Map EXHIBIT B - Detailed Scope of Work EXHIBIT C - Detailed Task and Budget EXHIBIT D - Proposed Time Schedule EXHIBIT E - Staff Qualifications EXHIBIT F - Written Assurances EXHIBIT G - Proof of Notification EXHIBIT H - 1996-2000 Capital Improvement Program 0 10 10 APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT FOR COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND AND PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS The following application is presented to the Texas Water Development Board for consideration in response to the request for proposals as advertised in the August 4, 1995 Texas Register for the funding of a regional detention study for the Cooper Creek watershed and a regional channel improvement study for the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed within the City of Denton, Texas To, assist in the TWDB review process, the format of this application parallels the guidelines for funding applications procedures obtained from the TWDB I. GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Denton is a political subdivision of the State of Texas with the authority to plan for and implement flood protection measures and is a member of the National Flood Insurance Program (1) Legal name of applicant City of Denton (2) Participating political subdivisions City of Denton (3) Authority of law under which each political subdivision was created The City of Denton, Texas was chartered on February 24, 1959 as a General Law City, with the power to levy taxes (4) Name, title, address, phone number and facsimile number of applicant's official representative Mr Jerry Clark, P E Director of Engineering and Transportation 215 McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Ph (817)566-8358 Fax (817) 566-8236 (5) Citations of applicant's legal authority to plan for and implement flood protection measures The City of Denton has jurisdiction to implement drainage design criteria and general subdivision regulations as per its Subdivision Ordinances All drainage improvements must comply with the drainage design criteria and must be approved by the Director of Engineering and Transportation prior to implementation The City of Denton has adopted a flood control ordinance in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program requirements (6) Is this application in response to a published Request for Proposals list in the Texas Register? Yes (7) Document number of Request for Proposals and date published TRD #9509442 published in the Texas Register, August 4, 1995 (8) The total anticipated planning cost of the regional detention study The total planning cost is expected to be $120,000 (9) Total amount of grant funds requested from the TWDB The amount of funding requested is $60,000 (10) Applicant cash contribution to the study The City of Denton will match the $60,000 provided by the TWDB (11) Source of cash contribution, explanation of source of local cash contribution and list of sources (a) General Revenue (b) Bond Funds (c) (Exact amount from each source cannot be determined at this time Funding will be from either or both of these sources based on the availability of funds when the project is undertaken) (12) Applicant in -kind contributions, including a description of in -kind services to be provided None 2 (13) Detailed description of why proposed planning is needed Cooper Creek Regional Detention A significant portion of the Cooper Creek watershed is presently undeveloped The current development trend is to proceed from the south to the north Fortunately, the bulk of the undeveloped area in the watershed is in the upper one-third of the watershed (north) There are several segments of Cooper Creek that are currently experiencing erosion due to the increase in development in the watershed and two bridges have been washed out The lower portion of Cooper Creek is fully developed and channel improvements in this area are not economically feasible, since there is essentially no room for channel expansion Implementation of a regional detention system may provide adequate flood protection and allow the development in the watershed to continue as well as prevent further erosion damage downstream Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement The majority of the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed is presently developed There are significant areas along the tributary that are within the 100-year floodway, which are presently developed for commercial and residential use The primary cause of the inundation of these areas is the existing M K T Railroad crossing near the center of the stream length, which causes sufficient backwater that water is diverted from the main channel into Bell Avenue and in three directions, one of which is out of the PEC-4 watershed and into the Pecan Creek watershed The diverted flow diversion is of sufficient magnitude that the Corps of Engineers has delineated a floodway along the flow diversion path In addition to the backwater caused by the railroad, there is insufficient channel capacity downstream of the railroad crossing to convey the 100-year floodwaters The proposed planning is intended to eliminate the interbasin flow diversion by providing sufficient channel improvements for flood control within the entire Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed (approximately 15 stream miles) Flood control will be achieved by restricting the 100-year stormwater flow to the PEC-4 channel area Implementing the proposed planning measures will remove a large number of properties from the floodway, including some existing homes Also, there will be an additional benefit to the properties along the main Pecan Creek stream by eliminating the flow diversions from Tributary PEC-4 (14) Detailed description of why funding assistance is needed The flood protection planning process must be approached on a watershed -wide basis to provide an orderly system of unprovements Planning efforts that are watershed -wide are by nature more costly than isolated, or local improvements Unfortunately, the citizens of Denton are more willing to provide funding for the physical improvements associated with the local projects than they are for planning efforts (local or regional) Funding for the structural improvements to be developed by this proposed planning effort is currently available through the City's capital improvement program (see Item I 1 below) The current capital improvement program does not include funding for the planning effort needed to develop the required structrual improvements Obtaining funding assistance for these planning efforts could imtiate additional funding from other sources (15) Identification of potential sources and amounts of funding available for implementation of viable flood protection measures resulting from the proposed planning The proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1996-97 include (a) Cooper Creek Improvements (Phase I) $502,000 (b) Pecan Creek Trib PEC-4 Imprvmts (Near Robertson St) $734,000 The proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1998-99 include (c) Pecan Creek Tnb PEC-4 Imprvmts (Near Bradshaw St) $734,000 (d) Cooper Creek Improvements (Phases II and III) $1,162,000 and $712,000 H. PLANNING INFORMATION (16) Description of geographical planning area Cooper Creek, The City of Denton is located in Denton County at the junction of Interstate Highways 35E and 35W, approximately 41 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas and approximately 36 miles northeast of Fort Worth, Texas The Cooper Creek watershed contains approximately 4,500 acres and generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast toward the Lake Lewisville reservoir The Cooper Creek watershed hes almost entirely within the City of Denton proper or its extraterritorial jurisdiction There are also four tributaries to Cooper Creek that will be studied for detention possibilities in the proposed project Pecan Creek The Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed contains approximately 1,100 acres located entirely within the City of Denton and generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast toward the Lake Lewisville reservoir The headwaters of the tributary begin at the University of North Texas campus The majority of the stream length extends through the older section of the city, including a downtown commercial district, a low income residential neighborhood and an existing cemetery 4 (17) Mlip of proposed planning area " ' ' See Exhibit A (18) Description of existing or potential flood hazard the planning is intended to address and the way in which the proposed planning will address the problem Cooper Creek Regional Detention i Existing developments along the lower segments of Cooper Creek are experiencing erosion along the channel banks The culvert crossings at Maylull and Mingo Roads are severely undersized and have washed out in the past Mayhdl road is an arterial with a daily traffic load of 2,000 to 3,000 vehicles per day Mingo Road is a heavily traveled route with approximately 4,000 vpd, which consists largely of people who commute to and from the City of Denton from the east Further development in the upstream portions of the Cooper Creek watershed can cause these problems to intensify, causing widespread erosion along the creek through the existing developments and continued damage to the Mingo Road culvert The damage from flooding is likely to vary widely, ranging from simple channel bank erosion, to potential damage to structures along the creek, to potential injury resulting from another Mingo Road culvert wash -out Development is such that there is no room for expanchng the existing channel for flood protection The proposed planning will determine the potential for detention sites upstream of the historically flooded areas to help maintain, or possibly reduce, existing peak discharges along Cooper Creek A system of detention ponds constructed within the watershed cannot be constructed at random without evaluating the cumulative effect of several detention ponds on the peak flow within Cooper Creek It is possible that a randomly constructed system of detention ponds can make conditions worse along Cooper Creek by causing peak flows from one or more tributaries to coincide with peaks on the main stem of Cooper Creek Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement Since the majority of the PEC-4 tributary flows through existing developments, there is a high potential for property damage as a result of the floodwaters leaving the channel banks Diverted flow that leaves the main channel flows along Bell Avenue, which has a daily traffic load of approximately 11,000 vehicles There is also a potential for citizen injury and/or death at some of the stream crossings In several locations, the existing tributary channel is several feet deep and is directly adjacent to the roadway or along a shopping center parking lot Filially, the downstream half of the tributary passes through a low income residential neighborhood, where there is a high potential for injury since many of the homes were constructed long ago and are located very close to the channel The proposed planning will determine the extent of channel improvements needed to Imut the 100-year floodplam to the channel area, thus removing a significant number of presently developed commercial properties and residences from the floodway (19) Description of historical flooding and flood damage in the proposed planning area Cooper Creek Regional Detention Flooding problems in the Cooper Creek watershed are relatively new due to the development that took place in the late 1970's and early 1980's Since this development occurred, the City of Denton has had at least two 10-year storms that produced sufficient runoff to overtop most of the bridges/culverts along Cooper Creek Most of the older bridges (20 to 30 years old) will convey runoff on the order of a 5-year frequency There have been instances where the bridges at Mayhdl and Mingo Roads have been completely washed out Temporary culverts have been installed at the Mayhill and Mmgo Road crossing until such time as the potential for wash -out is significantly reduced In addition, many areas along Cooper Creek, especially the older, established residential areas are experiencing bank erosion There have been instances where floodwaters have inundated homes in these areas Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 flows through some of the oldest neighborhoods within the City of Denton, beginning at the University of North Texas, continuing through the southern portion of downtown, and then through an older low income residential area Many buildings are located only a few feet from the channel bank In one case, a building was constructed over the channel The existing channel was constructed in many stages beginning in the late 1920's to the early 1960's There is no documentation of flooding prior to the early 1980's In the 1960's and 1970's the University of North Texas constructed many new buildings and parking lots Several of the older single family residential neighborhoods near the university have been converted to multi -family uses The amount of runoff from these areas has increased dramatically The City of Denton has experienced at least two 10-year storms since 1981 In those instances, there were severe street flooding along Tributary PEC-4, as well as bridge overtopping The worst flooding has been observed to occur on Bell Avenue just upstream of the MKT Railroad/Robertson Street crossing Stormwater has been observed as high as five feet, stranding several motorists and inundating nearby homes During the flood events, the residential area east of Bell Avenue, south of Hickory Street and north of Dallas Drive become inaccessible to emergency vehicles Current hydraulic models suggest that much of the downtown area and many of the older neighborhoods would be inundated by the 100-year stormwaters 0 (20) Description of how the planning Will address public safety and welfare Cooper Creek Regional Detention The objective of the proposed planning is to develop a system of regional detention ponds to reduce the peak discharges along Cooper Creek such that the erosion along the creek can be reduced or eliminated The regional ponds will maintain peak discharge at a level consistent with the capacity of the existing downstream channel to avoid channel improvements in an already confined space Also, reducing the peak discharges along Cooper Creek will reduce the size of a new culvert/bridge at Mayhill and Mingo Roads to prevent future wash -outs The reduction in peak discharges will reduce, or possibly eliminate the potential damage to structures along Cooper Creek, especially at Maylnll and Mingo Roads, thereby reducing the potential compromise of the public safety and welfare Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement Elunniating the flow diversion by confining the floodwaters to the channel area will remove a 4gmficant number of presently developed properties from the floodway, thereby reducing the potential for injury and/or death related to flooding along the tributary In addition, there will be a significant reduction in the property damage expected along the creek Implementation of the flood protection measures may have a high potential for economic benefit since the flood protection is likely to provide opportunities for the excising properties to expand and/or re -develop (21) Current unemployment rate in the proposed planning area Cooper Creek watershed 3 13% Pecan Creek watershed 6 9% (22) Current per -capita income in the proposed planning area Cooper Creek watershed $15,841 Pecan Creek watershed $10,294 (23) Current population residing in the proposed planning area Cooper Creek watershed 2100 Pecan Creek watershed 2750 (24) Current population residing in the 100-year floodplain Cooper Creek watershed 1700 Pecan Creek watershed 2200 (25) Value of property in the 100-year floodplain Cooper Creek watershed $48,809,200 Pecan Creek watershed $58,393,825 (26) Number of National Flood Insurance Program policies in effect in the proposed planning area There are currently 271 NFIP policies in effect Cooper and Pecan Creeks Detailed information of the number of policies in effect per watershed was not available from FEMA However, we estimate the estimate there to be 135 current policies in the Cooper Creek watershed and 40 in the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed (27) Method for determination of potential cost effectiveness of proposed flood protection solutions Cooper Creek Regional Detention The method for determining the potential cost effectiveness of the proposed regional detention system is to compare the cost of the proposed detention pond system to the value of property removed from the floodplain Additional consideration will be given to the reduction in the flood hazard potential, whether property damage or injury to the citizens in the planning area A level of protection of the proposed regional detention system will be determined on a recurrence interval basis (i a to determine the frequency of flooding with the regional detention system in place) Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement The method for determining the potential cost effectiveness of the proposed channel improvements is to compare the cost of the proposed improvements to the value of property removed from the floodplain Additional consideration will be given to the reduction in the flood hazard potential, whether property damage or injury to the citizens in the planning area (28) Date(s) and descnption(s) of most recent flood protection planning in the proposed planning area Cooper Creek Regional Detention None to date Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement During the period of June 1993 to February 1994, the City of Denton hired a consultant to investigate possible actions to reduce flooding along Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 between Bell Avenue and Lakey Street Several hydraulic stream modifications were reviewed , such as removing existing culverts, expansion of existing bridges, etc An abandoned railroad bridge crossing was removed at a cost of $20,000 in an attempt to improve the channel conveyance The result of the bridge removal was to only slightly reduce the floodplain elevation Other investigations made suggest that individual actions, such as culvert removal, would have little or no effect when implemented individually, but if done in combination the culvert improvements may have a significant impact on the floodplam elevation Therefore, a regional approach to flood planning along the Tributary PEC-4 is thought to provide an economical approach (29) Description of how the proposed planning will coordinate with other flood protection plans or facilities in the planning area, surrounding regions, and the state Both portions of the proposed study will be performed using the City of Denton Master Drainage Plan as a guide when determining the location of the proposed regional detention pond sites and the possible channel improvement scenarios In addition, the City of Denton Drainage Design Criteria Manual will be used to evaluate the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of the regional detention ponds and the proposed channel improvements The City's thorough fare master plan, master zoning plan and water and sewer master plans will belconsulted during the study (30) Detailed scope of work for the proposed planning See attached Exhibit B (31) Task and budget for detailed scope of work by task See attached Exhibit C (32) Time schedule for completing the detailed scope of work by task See attached Exhibit D (33) Expense budget for total proposed planning See attached Exhibit C (34) Qualifications and direct experience of proposed project staff See attached Exhibit E (35) Identify the watershed(s) for which flood protection needs will be addressed Cooper Creek and Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watersheds (36) Description of how flood protection needs of the entire watershed will be considered Refer to Item 20 above (37) Method of monitoring study progress Periodic (at least monthly) project coordination meetings between City staff and consultant III. WRITTEN ASSURANCES (38) Proposed planning does not duplicate exiting projects with the exception of updating existing flood protection plans See attached Exhibit F (39) Implementation of viable solutions identified through the proposed planning will be diligently pursued and local sources of funding for implementation of viable solutions will be provided See attached Exhibit F (40) Written evidence that local matching funds and m-kind services are available for the proposed planing See attached Exhibit F (41) Applicant is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program The City of Denton participates in the National Flood Insurance Program and is listed as Community Number 480194 See attached Exhibit F IV. PROOF OF NOTIFICATION Notification to all political subdivisions in the proposed planning area by certified mail that an application for planning grant assistance is being filed with the TWDB has been sent to the following Denton County and the Denton Independent School District (refer to Exhibits G and M 10 1 �u 9 _ y i I � , f t l 1 6 a y } f I n 1 EXHIBIT A e . _ { f PLANNING AREA MAP I � 1 1 ` y i E + 1 1 I p 1 - � �� � _ � — 1 I r � I �� ; 1 �� _< � r r � � rl� k � � i �) 1 � r s t{� — � � 4 � — � � N 1 �� @ s � I r I YI «� � r � ' — �i � � � 4 4 � � � �- - � 1� 1 ' r 1 - ji � - r � � jr� r + r � r t ��` - r `I j i ( � lj ( i� I r �' � F I I r � I� � � � 1 i i � � � I � �I x �p ti� ' f s { � � � i I 1 p �� r I a 1 3 � t � 1� r � ( �� i� I i � � fli � � � I 1 r � r � r i � r f� } �� k I n 1�n� � � s e i I 4 � j � 1 I � � Y � ' �1 } � 1 e s r _i I� � f 1 .� i l i � — r �r � 1 � i i C i S a .l rr � i — r i � � � _ � r r r � � � 1 C j' � j {�, � 4 ,` _ i � � �I I! r � � � i 1 I � " 1 � k I �� ' t _ F � r I� _ r I � '' r +IV � I �f f 4 r r I,n r � � j i � �! ( i ,� v � Lrn ] M � ` Nli _ � III 1 � 1 � 1 r'♦ E _� E � � � I �' F i 3� Y 1 r � � k I V a� F f 1 � I r �I I i L� i 1 � � � 1 I + ��, r 1 ' r U � ,r � �� ���� r I � E 4 r ,a 1 � - �� 49 � � _ 1 ' I — � � 4 � _ � I i ' �4 �' ; i '� � _ � i, E r I. i t I � � t r � z t I i � e �� ��� � I� I � 1 _ � i— M1� "; _ i F� I � i 1 1^ A ,4 I 1 � i t , _ yl 1 � t tl I I _ 1 ,e P EXHIBIT B p DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK I `% � I 3 l h 1 t Y 1 1 1 a 4 a I x - Fv 1 e � e 1 ' r r ! k h I t � i a - ff � e 4 F d — I P kl L ry , 1 I — tl I k 1 ' t , k - iF " r I� r I I tt 1 I r I I } ' Ir bti{k I { � I r 1 I , 1 r { i fl I { � r II f I - r r r I a i I r i 1 f I f ! f ' f t f' � f f 1 r � 1 i i k f � � r I f t i 1 V1 I r f r i DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK FOR TASK 1: COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY PHASE I - RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION A A coordination meeting will be held between the City and its consultant for the purpose of reviewing available data for use during the study, reviewing the scope of the work to be done and the objectives of the study, and to review the project personnel and their responsibilities for both the City and its consultant B Perform visit to the Cooper Creek watershed to evaluate possible sites for regional detention ponds The site visit will include the review of not more than six possible sites for acceptability as regional detention facilities, including the following The area north of Cooper Creek, east of Old North Road, west of Loop 288, and south of Windsor Street 2 The area north of Kings Row, east of Yorkshire, and southwest of Loop 288 The area north of Hercules, east of F M 2164, south of Loop 288, and west of Redstone 4 The area north of Evers Parkway, west of F M 2164, and south of Loop 288 Two other additional sites may be selected for evaluation in the study if conditions observed during the site visit suggest a favorable location C Coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the latest hydrologic and hydraulic computer models for the Cooper Creek watershed D Coordinate with local utility companies to determine the presence of existing utility lines within the possible regional detention facility site listed in Item B above E Coordinate with the City staff to obtain available base mapping The base map(s) will be prepared by the City from information currently available on its geographic information system (GIS) F Coordinate with survey subconsultant to obtain field data necessary for preliminary sizing of the proposed detention facilities at each location G Coordinate with geotechnical subconsultant to obtain soil boring data at each site One M1 boring will be made at each location selected as a possible detention site PHASE H - CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION A Perform hydrologic analysis on the sites identified in Item I B above, including the following Computation of contributing drainage area to the sites being evaluated Modify the existing hydrologic computer model from FEMA (if available) to include design computation points at the potential regional detention facility sites If an existing hydrologic computer model is not available, a new model will have to be created Determination of the 5-, 10-, 25-, 50- and 100-year peak discharges for existing and ultimate watershed conditions with the detention facilities in place at each potential regional detention facility site The typical SCS primary spillway will be used to estimate peak discharges with the proposed detention facilities in place 4 Determine the maximum storage available at each of the regional detention facility sites Future development adjacent to each site will be considered in the determination of the detention pond layout phase in addition to the existing development surrounding each site Evaluate the cumulative effect of the regional detention facilities on the peak discharges along Cooper Creek for the portion of the creek upstream of Loop 288 Prioritize the regional detention pond construction by cost/benefit analysis No more than twelve construction sequence scenarios will be evaluated to determine the effect of construction sequencing on the Cooper Creek peak discharges B Perform hydraulic analysis of impact of detention facilities on Cooper Creek floodplain 1 Modify existing HEC-2 hydraulic stream model of Cooper Creek to include the peak discharges computed in Item II A above 2 Compute expected floodplain profiles corresponding to 10-, 50- 100- and 500-year frequencies 3 Delineate the 100-year floodplams on available topographic maps for existing conditions and ultimate development conditions with the proposed detention facilities in place 4 Prepare summary table of results of hydraulic analysis 1W C Prepare a conceptual estimate of anticipated construction costs associated with the proposed regional detention system D Review the TNRCC regulahons'associated with detention facility construction and outline steps needed to obtain TNRCC approval of the proposed regional detention system Potential problem areas, if any, will be also identified E Summarize the results of the conceptual evaluation Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the conceptual evaluation The following items shall be included in the conceptual report Comparison of discharges for existing development, ultimate watershed development, and ultimate watershed development with the proposed regional detention system in place Map showing the entire watershed with the locations of the proposed regional detention facilities and their respective contributing drainage areas, the horizontal location of the existing utilities that could pose a potential conflict with the proposed detention facilities, and the 100-year floodplam limits for existing conditions and ultimate watershed conditions with the detention facilities in place The anticipated construction costs of the regional detention facilities on a per - site basis as well as for the entire regional detention system A recommendation will be made concerning the sequencing of constructing the regional detention facilities in accordance with Item H A above A recommendation for alternative dry weather uses for the regional detention facilities, as well as the possibility of retaining water in the ponds for aesthetic purposes, such as in a park Conduct a coordination meeting with the consultant to discuss the results of the conceptual evaluation and the consultant's recommendations for proceeding with the project PHASE I) I - PRELIMINARY DESIGN A One meeting will be held with affected property owners near each of the proposed regional detention facilities, up to a maximum of six meetings with the property owners Items to be discussed include the purpose of the proposed regional detention system, concerns the property owners may have regarding the detention facilities, and ideas for incorporating the detention facilities into multi -use facilities, such as soccer fields, etc VW B Develop a preliminary design of the proposed detention facilities at the sites identified in Task II Determine a suitable layout of each of the proposed regional detention facilities No more than three alternative layouts will be investigated at each site during the preliminary design phase The concerns of each neighborhood will be addressed and incorporated into the design, if applicable Develop a preliminary design of the dam structure and primary and emergency spillways for each site The design of the dam and spillways shall consider the existing conditions and expected future development at each site C Refine the hydrologic and hydraulic models to be consistent with the proposed detention facility layouts and spillways identified in Item III B above D Refine the conceptual construction cost estimate to consider items developed during the preliminary design phase E Assist the City with the preparation of the necessary documentation to be submitted to the TNRCC for approval of the regional detention facility design and to obtain the necessary permits for construction of the regional detention facilities F Prepare the necessary information needed for a submittal to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) G Prepare a report summanzing the results of the preliminary design task, including recommendations and identification of potential problem areas The report will be presented by the consultant to the City at a coordination meeting DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK FOR TASK 2: PECAN CREEK TRIB. PEC-4 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY PHASE I - RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION A A coordination meeting will be held between the City and its consultant for the purpose of reviewing available data for use during the study, reviewing the scope of the work to be done and the objectives of the study, and to review the project personnel and their responsibilities for both the City and its consultant B Perform visit to the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed to observe the existing conditions of the channel The site visit will also include the preparation of a photographic record of the conditions that presently exist along the channel, with particular attention focused on areas where potential design problems area anticipated C Coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the latest hydrologic and hydraulic computer models for Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 D Coordinate with survey subconsultant to obtain field data, including the location and finished floor elevation of structures adjacent to the creek, channel cross sections, and bridge/culvert data for the entire length of the stream E Coordinate with local utility companies to determine the presence of existing utility lines along Tributary PEC-4 PHASE H - PRELIMINARY DESIGN A Perform hydraulic analysis of impact of the proposed channel improvements to Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 Evaluate not more than three channel improvement scenarios to determine the type and extent of channel uprovements needed to eliminate the diversion of stormwater from the PEC-4 watershed to the Pecan Creek watershed The intent of the channel improvement evaluation will be to maintain the 100-year floodplain within the channel banks as required by the City of Denton drainage criteria 2 Evaluate the need for increasing bridge/culvert sizes for the crossings along Tributary PEC-4 Delineate on available topographic maps the 100-year floodplams for existing conditions and conditions with the proposed channel improvements in place IM 4 Prepare summary table of results of hydraulic analysis C Prepare a conceptual estimate of anticipated construction costs associated with the proposed channel improvement scenarios evaluated in the study A cost/benefit analysis will be made of each channel improvement scenario developed D Review the Corps of Engineers regulations associated with 404 Permits and outline steps needed to obtain 404 Permit approval of the proposed channel improvements Potential problem areas, if any, will be also identified E Prepare the necessary information required for a subnmttal to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) reflecting the proposed planning project F Summarize the results of the preliminary design Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the preliminary design The following items shall be included in the design report a Tabular comparison of floodplam elevations for existing channel conditions and conditions with the proposed channel improvements in place Map showing the entire watershed with the locations of the proposed channel improvements, the location and type of bridge/culvert improvements needed, the horizontal location of the existing utilities that could pose a potential conflict with the channel improvements, and the 100-year floodplam hunts for existing conditions and conditions with the channel improvements in place Cross sections of the channel unprovements in sufficient detail to illustrate the type of improvements proposed An estimate of the probable construction costs and total project costs of the channel improvements Conduct a coordination meeting to discuss the results of the preliminary design and the consultant's recommendations for proceeding with the project M t k t f yyy , �l 4 t � 1 y 3 , A ` 11 ( F r II I r 1 � r EXHIBIT C r1 t 1 DETAILED TASK AND BUDGET i ^' Y I ��1 1 � � •I 1 I 1 1 rs I , � 1 1 ; f 1, L j i ! I f 1 n I _..A P 5 L N � 1� � it f i�i Iq�I � i 4 +' � ' y `�j' � '- J` pf� � � ��J � l � � � � - � {i �� r i r _ � � � � � _ 1 r � i V{`>' Y e T� � i 1 t it � i� � r `� j � 3� 1 o� f 1 � '� � i3 'i � r � i �I i '+ I E � � e �I � � � � � ` r r n -1 F ( tE ' � h�i � �i N ° � 4 i i 9 �— � It t g F' � � i s j —i � � s ! i � �� f � �y e�E r_ �� , " � € � ! !� � r i� � � �a i � � � � i � � ,Y p�, - � � F A na — � _ i � 13 �"e r F � t � I � y��� Yi - �Ii (9 k � ^ y � ' i 1{ I I � ' 1 a Y u � 4 � � ` 4 A R 3 � � ~ j r � � r 3 ' _ .S1 � I�I `4'�Y � I � ` f a ,` i ' � ��, p 3 � � �' t '� .i 44 I Y� � r � I F 1 I; I ~ � � _ � 1 rr � _ i� ¢ d i[ , � , �r � �,� 1 r I r � I Ii'�� �{ � i 1 � f � ,i -. 5 � i i � _ � � � r � i yt 7 I x �! i � � I � L I I �� � � m ���� � � � j �� , §' � - � ,- � r � p ' � � ♦ � k c - �a� � A��-�-�-n-�-�-..-ti _ ... -. n._.._ +- ..l i.__ _.... 1� 1F -rt_ ._.�. ..... ..--...., .aC ..r.w.n._ ._....r { r { EXHffiTT C TASK 1 - COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS prepereA By: Frsess and N." Ise SENIOR PROJECT PROJECT ENGINEERING WORD TASK ENGINEER MANAGER ENGINEER TECHNICIAN PROC TOTAL cost movescen cs. con ease 1 RECONNAISSANCE B DATA COLL. A Cordinseon MaedW 4 0400 4 *an 4 $IN 1 $38 13 $998 8 Vint Possible Detention FealBy, Sees 4 0320 4 Al 30 1 038 9 $538 C Corderson with FEMA 1 $80 4 /180 d s2e0 D Coo,dins9on w0h Lwd U0110s 1 180 4 0180 5 $290 E Coordinate with City on ease Mapping 1 $80 2 IN 3 0170 F Coordinate with Survey WboorwMant 2 $180 a $300 1 $as 11 0556 G Co edinedon w/ GwtaohNad Subooneu8am 2 160 4 $180 1 03S J 370 4 $460 15 01 200 30 01 350 4 $152 53 $3 102 II CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION A Hydrdoglo Analyds of Wasted Sees 1 Wimate Orson. Ans 1 480 2 0do 3 $170 2 Mod0y Exletln9 FEMA NEC 1 Modaliel 1 080 32 81 440 33 01 520 3 DeteMm Design Oisphr9es 2 01e0 30 01 020 38 s1 780 4 Detemim Maximum &.We r Spree 1 $80 40 01 000 41 01 Sao S Evsluete ConeOuadon Samrba 2 $230 4 $320 12 $540 18 01 090 B Hydrry110 BOeam Andyds 1 Input Computed Olsohr9w We Model. 2 090 2 $90 2 Compute Corrspormi Floodpinn Dew. 2 0100 12 $540 14 0700 3 D.O.M. Competed Roodpidm 2 0150 12 $540 24 $912 38 $1012 4 prepare SUmmry T.W. of Result; 4 0180 2 $7e a 0256 C prepare Comeptud Coe Es0mm 1 080 12 $540 4 $152 17 $772 D Perform Covd8w fit Andyds S 0575 24 81 920 78 03 420 105 88 915 E Review TNRCC Perms Rpulremems 1 $115 2 Oleo 4 0180 7 0455 F Report PrepretioNPreeenladw 1 Report Aeprtllan 2 0230 4 $320 32 01440 32 01210 2 076 72 $3282 2 Review McMIN wl City 3 0240 1 s 270 1 1 038 10 848 10 01 150 47 03 700 282 $12 ON 00 $2 280 S 0190 404 $20 070 Is PRELIMNARY DESIGN A property Owmr Coordination Msetime 24 01 920 40 81 NO 24 $812 a $304 90 84 230 8 DeteMOn Ports Design (3 Sits) 1 War Structure Lsywb 4 0400 8 8540 24 01 ON 3a 02 180 2 primary Spillway 2 0160 24 it 080 20 $1 240 3 EmerBemy Spillway 2 01E0 is 67M is 8880 C RdimlHydrdopylHydrmHm 2 ste0 16 $720 19 $880 D Pmpra Nellminery Coat Estimre 1 $80 4 0180 4 $152 9 $412 E Asdet City w/ TNRCC petite Appiiostlon 1 slid 2 $100 a 0360 144 $5 472 Ise 08107 F Prepare IMormetion for CLOMR Rpueet 2 $230 4 $320 24 01 080 2 87e 32 01 708 G RemM prepeatioNpresematl0n 1 Report Preparation 2 $230 4 0320 is $720 is $000 2 Ole 40 01 954 2 Review M.UN w/ City 1 3 240 1 a $270 1 1 1 1 $381 10 1 $548 9 $1035 52 $410 178 88010 188 07144 13 s494 440 $20843 TOTAL SALARY 23 12 045 114 09 120 4" $22 050 248 09 424 22 #830 897 $44 075 EXPENSES Treed (4 Trips to City ONlow) $144 Travel 0 Trip to Site) 030 Compenr/CARD Expense 04 668 Printing Easeme $343 Comept Report 5 GBC 25 Pe9es 019 Prolim Report 0 GOO 00 Peps $28 0 SoM Rare 10 She 2 Submittal. $200 1 Vellum Rot 10 SM. 2 Submittals $80 5 diuellm Copies 10 SMo 2 Submittals $3e General Expeme 6100 Survey SubmMIMM $12 NO Geotwhriod Sabo vv intent 013,200 $30 all TOTAL EXPENSES TOTAL PROJECT $74 886 SM3195 1 IDTN9Sl93)T 1COOPER XIS EXHIBIT C TASK 2 - PECAN CREEK FLOW DIVERSION MITIGATION STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Prepr.d By Run .Od lik wl. 1. SENIOR PROJECT PROJECT ENGINEEf WOgD TASK ENGINEER MANAGER ENGINEER TECHNICIAN PROC TOTAL car .our am np1M oar rrxo art eowa tort I RECONNAISSANCE 0 DATA COLL A Cordinedon Moaning 4 $480 4 4320 4 i1S0 1 $38 13 $998 B Viat Channel Improvement 5n a 4480 6 $270 1 138 13 $708 C C cfinmlon Wth FEMA 4 i180 4 1100 0 Coordinate with Survey Suboorwlwa 4 t320 a 63M 1 038 /3 $710 E Cordlnrlon wrth Loot, lmlltn 4 11a0 4 $180 F Cocafttaion w/ GerenhNoal Subooneultem 2 1160 1 0 1 42837E 4 1460 18 41280 30 $1350 4 0152 64 03242 11, PRELIMINARY DESIGN A Hydrsulla &team Ant,yt,e 1 Determine Extent of Impovamenta Need. 6 0690 32 42 660 120 06 400 16B e8 850 2 Evt,ume Sddge/ hart Imrovemews a SM 32 el 440 40 $2 ON 3 Delmer- Computed Floodgaln 2 4100 10 0720 1S $800 4 Prepare Summry Table of fa ul . 4 Slap 4 4180 B Prsprt Conoapwal Coat Eadmate 4 4320 48 $2 140 62 42 480 C Ravlew Corps 404 Permit Rrlulremenr 1 0113 2 Sl60 12 4540 15 0615 D Napra Information far CLOMR R,.w 2 $230 4 $320 30 41 020 24 $912 2 $76 a8 $3188 E R.pon P,apratloNP aa.ntatpn 1 R.W Pmprmlon 2 $230 12 4900 24 41 ON 00 $2 280 2 $76 100 t4 020 2 Revlew Maota, wl Gty 4 ISM 8 8 11 01286 68 e8440 298 i18410 84 03183 6 090 480 t23 {8] TOTAL SALARY 16 $1725 64 467" 326 $14760 H $3192 a 4342 620 128730 EXPENSES Travel (2 Trips to Oty ONloee) Trsvd 11 Trip to mat 872 $72 ComMdr/CADO Expense $30 PNmirp Expanse 62 30 %elim Report 6 CHID 80 Pa01a 0320 09 8 SorM Note 12 SM. 418 1 Volum Plot 12 Shis 120 Isis 6 Sluellm Colin 10 Shts 1 SubmiOal 822 General E.,.. Survey Suboor tent 4100 Sun.Y Subcomft.m OB 100 t 60 TOTAL EXPENSES 11833] TOTAL PROJECT $45,076 BRBI93 2 [DTN93I93]T VECAN.JOS P 1 m i t f k � EXHIBIT D' I p PROPOSED TIME SCRI DULE ! � I A _ j A 1 , n � I r 1 t ! I� ,� �4' f � i - ,�. f � E n i f J � < - � r i ' i� � _ � �� !� � ' F '�> o � Y 2 — A ' ' _ �i � a f i � � r t i i � � i ! i � k N � � 1 � I � � � I � � � t 1 � � � � v � � � ` �� i � y i � e �' �� 1 I f f � r 3 � � i � � r .r I i I i E �� if t� i � ' Ii � �� � ! 1 � � ' f �1 Y ( i � 1 y � 1 1 i � f I' � r 1 i i � 7 ' { k i f r � � �r � � � — �� �, ; 1, � �i � `L � � � I `� f{t L i F ` b � a i � i � E i � 1 i ' �, ' 1 f t =�, ' I, z , ., � � t� � r �` �� _ s , � t �, _ �� ,� ^ r a .... _ � _.._,... _ _--..�.._....��� _.. �R _....._ ..T� ��_ �._ � ..�� .� Mu E-+ U W ti 0 x (14 r A E-+ U) z 0 HI E- z W E-E W LO A � Q CQ z E~ o M w a d x w w x Ci a w a 0 0 U 966E6 WarMaS 103POFdd ON3 ______ 7 Y m Z ti ^^ W O� Y < a 4 < Z 1p 0 x x OWL H39W3030 103rOdd NIOBS 0 rn �< x E- a o �„ o E W � p .Y+ Q d �• r U V 4 g Y yb i Z O 'q T C F M C < � N �' '� T E m 0 4 Z 0 a p u C A O G W T T L Y Y L W L Y Y L Ynl Y L .q 0 k� n 8 U 7 a r .l h W x y co O) r a n. a x L (M 0) CQ CQ a E+ ,M Vim U G d to rn > rn z F O x 96M U AMN 103roUd ON3 "MEN 966L'Z AuvnNvr 103rOHd NIO38 I z ' I _ trn a , I y I a a = it i Y J rl 1 � F E I ) IF IE I t a ` EXHIBIT E' I STAFF QUALIFIC NS f I{ I i M + _ i h I E ) E ]^ + 1 I 1 �n P f r r 1 r I f r � r T rlx r f I I 1 I P I 19 ) fr i 1 — 4 M1a I 4 FI r� I i P' i F f frr � r ll ill I f t r 1 � 1 1 l I Ir t i { 4 I r 'I I 14 V I I I i i i i I I V y 1 t r ra �I� r PP M1 r r L IrI t Lxl� 1 1 EXHIBIT E John Lee Rutledge, P.E. Principal FREESE-Ni FIOlB YEARS EXPERIENCE: With This Firm 10 With Other Firms 0 EDUCATION: B S E , Civil Engineering, Duke University, 1983 M S E , Water Resources, University of Texas at Austin, 1985 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING: "Unsteady Flow Modeling Using DAMBRK and DWOPER," University of Texas at Austin, 1987 REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, Texas #65045 Professional Engineer, Oklahoma #16255 Professional Engineer, Arkansas #8262 Professional Engineer, Louisiana #25581 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1985-Present: Freese and Nichols, Inc 1990 - Associate 1994 - Principal Mr Rutledge, a Principal of Freese and Nichols, serves as department manager in the firm's Drainage and Flood Management Department Mr Rutledge is experienced in hydraulic and hydrologic studies as well as design of water resource projects He has served as a project manager 1 and design coordinator for a number of dams and drainage systems In addition, he has performed numerous hydraulic and hydrologic studies, including dam breach analyses on eight major dams and Probable Maximum Flood studies for existing and proposed projects Representative projects include: i Drainage and Flood Studies • Updates of the PMF model of the six Highland Lakes Dams on the Colorado River for the Lower Colorado River Authority using the National Weather Services dynamic wave computer model, NETWORK. The drainage areas of the reservoirs ranged from 19,350 to 26,340 square miles Over 600 miles of river were modeled using the NETWORK model E-1 EXHIBIT E ro FREESE-MCWOLS e Project Manager for the Calibration of the National Weather Service's Mississippi-Illinois-Missoun's DWOPER model utilizing the 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Mississippi River, 265 miles of the Illinois River, and 100 miles of the Mississippi River Purpose of the study was to prepare data describing the 1993 flood, including the numerous levee breaches and perform the calibration of the model • Project Manager for design of $14 million of drainage facilities associated with a proposed runway at the Dallas -Fort Worth International Airport and 404 permitting, including wetland mitigation development • Breach analyses for eight major dams, including Moms Sheppard Dam • Probable Maximum Flood analyses for Eagle Mountain Lake and Lake Bridgeport for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District No One, including the development of a flood routing model for Lake Bridgeport and Eagle Mountain Reservoir using the DWOPER model for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District Number One • Project Manager for the preliminary design and permitting of a channel dam and development of Johnson Creek for the Texas Rangers, associated with the Ballpark at Arlington Permits included water rights, 404, and FEMA CLOMR • Flood routing studies, including the PMF, associated with the design of Palo Duro Reservoir for the Palo Duro River Authority • Flood routing studies, including PMF, for the Alan Henry Project for the Brazos River Authority • Flood routing studies, including PMF, for Mitchell County Reservoir for the Colorado River Municipal Water District • Flood routing studies, including PMF, for the Durant Raw Water Storage Reservoir for the City of Durant, Oklahoma e Preliminary design of the Belzora Landing Reservoir for the Sabine River Authority, including flood studies using the National Weather Service's DWOPER model • Preliminary design of the spillway system for the Cape Girardeau/Bollinger County Recreation Reservoirs, including design flood development • Preliminary design of proposed modifications to Lake Arlington Dam for the City of Arlington, including PMF flood studies using the DWOPER model. • Development of gate operating procedures for the proposed South Bend Reservoir for the Brazos River Authority, Lake Bridgeport and Eagle Mountain Reservoir for the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District Number One, and Lake Conroe for the San E-2 EXHIBIT E Jacinto River Authority The Lake Conroe project involved the development of a computerized gate operating program tied to an existing ALERT telemetry system of rainfall and lake level gages • Early warning system for 17 low water crossing of the City of San Antonio, including automated on -site warning features • Updated PMF Study on the Moms Sheppard Dam for the Brazos River Authority, utilizing the DWOPER model The drainage area of the dam is about 13,000 square miles • Project Manager for redesign of drainage channel adjacent to Harris Hospital Northwest in Azle, Texas Work included a CLOMR from FEMA. • Project Manager for permitting and design of a 4 5 mile levee and floodwall for the City of Liberty, Texas along the Trinity River • Project Manager for the Lower Neches Valley Authority canal hydraulic study using the dynamic wave program, DWOPER • Project Manager for the floodplain development permit for the Carter Ranch for a levee in the floodplain of the Trinity River Dam and Embankment Design • Project Engineer for Palo Duro Dam for the Palo Duro River Authority • Project Engineer for the Lake Alan Henry Project for the Brazos River Authority • Project Engineer for a raw water storage reservoir for the City of Durant, Oklahoma • Project Manager and Project Engineer for the proposed Mitchell County Dam for the Colorado River Municipal Water District • Design of portions of S W Freese Dam for the Colorado River Municipal Water District • Project Engineer for the feasibility study and preliminary design of the proposed Belzora Landing Reservoir for the Sabine River Authority • Project Engineer for the feasibility study and preliminary design of recreational dam for Cedars Camps in Missouri • Preliminary design of the spillway system for the proposed Cape GirardeauBolhnger Counties (Missouri) Recreation Reservoirs • Project Manger for Sulphur Springs Draw and Red Lake Dams for Colorado River Municipal Water District • Project Manager for the design of an RCC Channel Dam in the Sabine River for the Sabine River Authority • Project Manager for the design of the 114 MG Terminal Storage Reservoir for the City of Kilgore E-3 EXHIBIT E rols FREEM- NICHC" • Project Manager for the design of 100 MG Terminal Storage Reservoir for the Colorado River Municipal Water District Dam Inspection/Repair • Twenty dam safety inspections of major dams • Project Engineer for the rehabilitation of Natural Dam for the Colorado River Municipal Water District. • Project Engineer for the rehabilitation of Little Flint Creek Dam for Southwestern Electric Power Company • Design of the emergency spillway and fuse plug as part of the Moms Sheppard Dam Rehabilitation for the Brazos River Authority. • Project Manager for the design of the Moms Sheppard Stilling Basin Extension • Project Manager for the repair of South Prong Dam for the City of Waxahachie, which included a 1300' RCC overflow emergency spillway • Project Manager for the repair of the Hubbard Creek Spillway for the West Central Texas Municipal Water District, which included innovative conduit extension walls to prevent recurring damage The concept was developed through the use of a physical model study Sedimentation Surveys e Sedimentation surveys for Eagle Mountain Reservoir and Lake Bridgeport for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District No One • Sedimentation surveys for Stryker Creek Lake for TU Electric Water Resource Planning • Project Manager on the preliminary design, permit application and hearing process for Mitchell County Reservoir • Project Manager for two feasibility studies involving mterbasm water transfers through existing canal systems for the Sabine and San Jacinto River Authorities and the Lower Neches Valley Authority • Project Manager for the long range water supply of a ten -county area in central Texas Construction Administration • Resident Representative for the construction of the Richland - Chambers Dam for the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District Number One • Resident Representative for the rehabilitation of little Flint Creek Dam, a slurry trench installation for Southwestern Electric Power Company E-4 EXHIBIT E r7w§ • ProlectEngineer for the General Representation of Palo Duro and Alan Henry Dam Projects • Project Manager for the General Representation of Mitchell County Dam, Durant Raw Water Storage Reservoir, and Sulphur Springs Draw Dams • Project Manager for the General Representation of the Moms Sheppard Stilling Basin Extension and Hubbard Creek Spillway Repair • Project Manager for the General Representation of the Kilgore Terminal Storage Facility • Project Manager for the General Representation of the South Prong Dam Rehabilitation Project. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Society of Civil Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Texas Society of Professional Engineers AWARDS/HONORS. Phi Beta Kappa Chi Epsilon Tau Beta Pt Summa Cum Laude, Duke University John A. Focht Presidential Endowment Graduate Scholarship, University of Texas PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS - "A Methodology for Calibration of Manning's Roughness Coefficients for an Unsteady Flow Model," Masters Thesis, 1985 "Correction of Seepage Through an Earthfill Dam in Arkansas," co-authored with Ronnie M Lemons, presented to the Texas Section of ASCE, Spring 1987 E-5 EXHIBIT E 'rols FREESE mlclI LS "Correction of Seepage Through an Earthfill Dam," co-authored with Ronnie M Lemons and Bill R Elsbury of McClelland Engineers, presented at the 16th Congress of the International Commission on Large Dams, 1988 "Increasing Spillway Capacity to Allow Passage of the PMF at Moms Sheppard Dam," presented at the 6th Annual Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, October 1989 "Natural Dam Emergency Repairs," co-authored with Ronnie M Lemons, presented at the Texas Section of ASCE, Fall 1989 "Preliminary Report of the Feasibility of an Interbasm Water Transfer Through Existing Canal Systems," co-authored with Ronnie Lemons, presented at ASCE Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 17th National Conference, April 1990 "Use of a Hydraulic Routing Model for PMF Development to Reduce Conservation of Calibrated Empirical Routing Methods," presented at ASCE Water Resources Planning and Management Division, 17th National Conference, April 1990 and at the 12th Annual U S Committee on Large Dams, April 1992 "Innovative Spillway Design," co-authored with Dr J Paul Tullis of Utah State University, presented at the ASCE Hydraulics Division, July 1990 "Rehabilitation of Dams for Planned Overtopping," co-authored with Ronnie M Lemons, P E and John R King, P E., presented at the 7th Annual Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, October 1990 "Development of a Real-time Flood Forecasting and Spillway Gate Operations Model," presented at the 4th Annual mid -year technical conference of the Texas Water Conservation Association, July 1991 "Lake Conroe Gate Operating Program," presented at the Texas Section of American Water Resources, December 1992 "Use of NETWORK Flood Routing Model to Reduce PMF's at Lower Colorado River Authority Dams," presented at the ASCE WaterPower'93 Conference in Nashville, TN in August 1993 and at the loth Annual Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, October 1993 E-6 EXHIBIT E rn FREESE-NICHCX8 "Use of Physical Hydraulic Models for Spillway Rehabilitation," presented at the Fourteenth Annual USCOLD Lecture Series, June 1994. "Calibration of Mississippi-Illinois-Missoun River System for 1993 Flood," presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, September 1994 "Determining Design Floods More Accurately with State -of -the -Art Computer Models," published in Hydro Review, Volume XIII, Number 6, August 1994 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES - United Way Annual Campaign for Tarrant County, Section Chairman, 1988 to 1994; Division Chairman 1994 Leadership Fort Worth Board Member, Streams and Valleys E-7 EXHIBIT E 'rols FREESE NICHOIS Michael J. Dellies, P.E. Civil Engineer YEARS EXPERIENCE: With This Firm 11 With Other Firms: 0 EDUCATION: M S , Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 1994 B S , Civil Engineering, Texas Tech University, 1983 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING: HEC-1 - Floodplam Hydrology, University of Texas, 1985 HEC-2 - Floodplam Hydraulics, University of Texas, 1985 International Symposium on Urban Hydrology, Hydraulic Infrastructures and Water Quality Control, University of Kentucky, 1985 Conference on Stormwater Management, Stormwater Modeling, Flood Frequency Analysis, and Stormwater Detention, Texas A&M University, 1986 Intergraph Inroads Computer Software Seminar, Huntsville, Alabama, 1989 WSPRO Water Surface Profile Computation Seminar, 1993 Underground Detention Designs for Stormwater Management, 1994 NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance, 1994 SWMM Model for Stormwater and CSO Management, 1994 REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, Texas #65938, 1989 Mr Dellies is an associate engineer and project manager for a number of Freese and Nichols' civil engineering projects, including floodwater management studies, street and site drainage systems, municipal and industrial master drainage plan development, site grading plans, channel improvement studies and designs, and detention pond designs Mr Dellies has attended special training seminars in stormwater management, stormwater modeling, flood frequency analysis and stormwater detention as well as in urban hydrology, hydraulic infrastructures and water quality control E-8 EXHIBIT E i FREESE-HI HOTS Representativ81projects include: • Project Engineer for water Diversion study for the City of Grapevine Effects of diverting drainage between adjacent watersheds was evaluated • Project Engineer for the development of a master drainage plan for the City of Denton The project included development of storm drainage criteria, drainage manual and a regional detention study for the Hickory Creek watershed • Project Engineer for the development of a master drainage plan for the City of Grapevine The project included establishing GPS monuments throughout the city, preparation of new topographic maps, evaluating over 900 storm drain inlets and 500 storm drain pipe segments, and field surveys to obtain over 475 cross sections for development of 17 HEC-2 hydraulic stream models covering over 30 stream miles • Project Engineer for detention pond and storm drain design to provide flood mitigation in established neighborhood of Fort Worth • Assisted in development of the Clear Creek West Drainage Plan for the City of Copperas Cove The plan included hydrology and hydraulics for the development of improved storm drainage systems throughout the watershed • Project Manager/Engineer for the development of drainage studies and plans and specifications for storm drain improvements in the Park Place, Parra Linda Estates and Placid Peninsula subdivisions in Grapevine • Project Engineer for the design of street drainage for plant roadways for Trinity River Authority Central Treatment Plant and American Airlines maintenance facilities • Project Engineer for the re-evaluation of all HEC-2 hydraulic stream models within the City of Abilene for the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood insurance re -study • Project Engineer for floodway realignment project for the City of Farmers Branch • Project Engineer for floodplam analysis in connection with Loyola Lane Bridge improvements for the City of Austin • Floodway/floodplain delineation study for the City of Grapevine • Floodplain reclamation for the City of Fort Worth • Project Manager for flood abatement study of North Pittman Creek for the City of Plano • Verification of floodway mapping in Sherman, Texas • Master drainage plan for Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth E-9 EXHIBIT E • Site grading plan, floodplai reclamation design, and study of various floodplam analyses to determine effects of development on adjacent streams e Water and sewer systems relocations related to expansion of S.H 26 in Grapevine, Texas. • Quantity and cost estimates for several street improvement projects in Tarrant County PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Society of Civil Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Texas Society of Professional Engineers HONORS AND AWARDS: Chi Epsilon National Civil Engineering Honor Society TSPE Young Engineer of the Year, 1994-95 PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS - "Master Planning Develops Solutions to Drainage Problems and Rebuilds Infrastructure Data Base," presented at the Texas Section ASCE Spring Convention, Waco, Texas, April 1995 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Arlington Big Brothers/Big Sisters E-10 EXHIBIT E FREESE-NI HOM Ronald G. King Water Resources Engineer EDUCATION: With This Firm 4 With Other Firms 2 B S Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, May 1991 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1991-Present: Freese and Nichols, Inc, Engineer-m-Training for Water Resources Design Department Mr King's experience includes work on several water resource studies and design and construction projects Representative projects include: • Bay City Dam - Project Engineer for preliminary design of modifications • Gibbons Creek Dam - Project Engineer for breach analysis using DAMBRK and annual safety inspections • SWEPCO - Project Engineer for annual and bi-annual inspections of power plant reservoir dams in East Texas and Louisiana. • Project Engineer for the update of the PMF model of the six Highland Lakes Dams on the Colorado River for the Lower Colorado River Authority using the National Weather Service NETWORK model The drainage areas ranged from 19,350 to 26,340 square miles Over 600 miles of river were modeled using the NETWORK model Also Project Engineer for dam stability analysis, and physical hydraulic model of the Buchanan seven -gate spillway • Sulphur Springs Draw Dam - Project Engineer for preliminary and final design, including all flood routing • South Prong Dam (Lake Waxahachie) - Project Engineer for preliminary and final design and resident project representative for construction • Hubbard Creek Dam - Project Engineer for hydraulic model of spillway and final design of spillway rehabilitation General Representative for construction of spillway rehabilitation Project included construction of conduit extension walls and repair of stilling basin flood dam for flood discharge stabilization • Project Engineer for the Calibration of the National Weather Service's Mississippi-Illinois-Missouri's DWOPER model utilizing the E-11 EXHIBIT E FREESE � NICMOLS 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Mississippi River, 265 miles of the Illinois River, and 100 miles of the Missouri river. Purpose of the study was to prepare data describing the 1993 flood, including the numerous levee breaches and perform the calibration of the model • Project Engineer for the update o£ the Emergency Action Plan for Little Flint Creek Dam near Gentry, Arkansas for Southwestern Electric Power Company Included update of the dam breach model using HEC-1 and DAMBRK, and compilation of a plan in case of emergencies such as a breach • Project engineer for the breach analysts of Longhorn Dam on the Colorado River in Austin and Decker Dam on Decker Creek near Austin, Texas DAMBRK was used to create the breach outflow hydrograph and DWOPER was used to route the flood wave downstream to the City of Bastrop • Project engineer for the design of the flood control levee around the City of Liberty, Texas. The levee will be approximately 5 miles on the bluff between the city and the Trinity River floodplam, and will include a combination of earthfill levees and structural floodwalls PROFESSIONAL American Society of Civil Engineers HONORS AND AWARDS: Chi Epsilon National Civil Engineering Honor Society President, UTA Chapter, 1990-1991 Joe Rady Distinguished Senior Award, 1990-1991 Marvin C Nichols Paper Contest Award, 1994 E-12 EXHIBIT E rn Curtis B. Beitel Water Resources Engineer YEARS EXPERIENCE: With This Firm 1 With Other Firms 0 EDUCATION: B S Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, May 1993 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE- 1993-Present Freese and Nichols, Inc, Engineer -in -Training for Water Resources Design Department 1991-1993. Freese and Nichols, Inc, Cooperative Education Position for Water Resources Design Department Mr Beitel is an engineer in the Water Resources Department Representative projects include: • Project Engineer for the development of a levee algorithm for the NWS operational model The levee model calculates both overtopping and breach flows between the river and the levees • Project Engineer for the Calibration of the National Weather Service's Mississippi -Illinois -Missouri DWOPER model utilizing the 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Mississippi River, 265 miles of the Illinois River, and 100 miles of the Missouri river Purpose of the study was to prepare data describing the 1993 flood, including the numerous levee breaches and perform the calibration of the model • City of San Antonio - Project Engineer for design of an Automated Low Water Crossing Warning System, to be monitored by an ALERT telemetry system • Edwards Underground Water District - Project Engineer for preliminary design of Indian Creek Recharge Reservoir, including all flood routing • City of Arlington - Project Engineer for the development of a flood forecasting model for Lake Arlington The model was developed for use with a spreadsheet • Developed several large hydrologic and hydraulic computer models of the Colorado River near Austin using the National Weather Services' NETWORK The PMF update for the six Highland Lakes Dams owned by the Lower Colorado River Authority utilized HEC-1 to model up to 26,000 square miles of drainage area and NETWORK to model over 600 miles of river channel E-13 EXHIBIT E FREESE � NIGMOLS • Project Engineer for the Calibration of the National Weather Service's Mississippi-Illinois-Missoun's DWOPER model utilizing the 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Mississippi River, 265 miles of the Illinois River, and 100 miles of the Missouri river Purpose of the study was to prepare data describing the 1993 flood, including the numerous levee breaches and perform the calibration of the model • Sulphur Draw Dam - Conducted the preliminary feasibility study Developed two large fortran programs for the study. Also participated in the design and construction representation • Lake Worth Dam - Determined the uplift forces on a RCC slab overlay • Lake Ray Roberts - Developed the final cost estimate for the $13 million water treatment plant in Denton, Texas This was a detailed cost estimate produced form scratch on a spreadsheet • Lake Brazos Dam - Assisted in the preliminary design of modifications • City of Durant - Assisted with the quantities for the Durant Raw Water Storage Reservoir PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: Associate Member - American Society of Civil Engineers COMPUTER EXPERIENCE. Lotus, Symphony, Quattro Pro, Autocad, Harvard Graphics, Microsoft Project 10, Windows, WordPerfect 51, HEC-1, HEC-2, HMR-52, DWOPER, KYPIPE, Fortran, VAX -VMS, HP 48SX, Applesoft Basic HONORS AND AWARDS: Chi Epsilon National Civil Engineering Honor Society Pledge Marshall, A&M Chapter, 1992-1993 Tau Beta Pi National Engineering Honor Society Phi Eta Sigma National Freshman Honor Society Dean's Honor Roll, Spring 1992 E-14 4 1 I ]I t k a � 1 l I � I 13 1 y P I 1 f L f I 1 ✓ 114 p (r a 1 1 11 3 y I 1 k ° i EXHIBIT'F { y r 1 WRITTEN ASSURANCES ' I J k 4i ' f I f ff � 1 n J d 1 1 1 , I a � I t k t � � k� � i 9' ✓tf I t m n !t I, i ' 1 f 1 1 I dd L ( f _ 1 +4t I F s � i — ' r 1 n� xti S F � 1 1 , i If 1 pF 1 , It r 1 �a CITY OF DENTON 2 15 E MCKINNEY Sr DENTCN TX 76201 8 1 7-566-8358 FAX 817-566-8235 August 17, 1995 Michael Delhes, P E Project Manager Freese and Nichols, Inc 811 Lamar Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 Dear Mike The City of Denton would like to provide the following assurances to the Texas Water Development Board for the 1995 Chant Application 1 This planning effort is not duplicated in other City programs We have enclosed a copy of our CIP that shows that some major funding is proposed in the two areas for structural improvements However, no funds are programmed for any studies that master plan these two major drainage basins The only flood study currently programmed is for a Downtown Drainage Planning Study for 1997-98 with a total of $60,000 programmed This does not cover PEC-4 but concentrates on the maw branch and north branch of Pecan Creek as they flow through the Central Business Distract 2 The City of Denton is committed to pursue viable solutions that result from these studies and planning efforts The enclosed CIP shows Denton's commitment to funding structural improvements but not adequately funding master planning studies for these two regional basms 3 The City of Denton has an excellent history with the FAA and others of meeting its required level of participation in grants that require City matching funds The City of Denton will meet its obligation using General Fund Revenues or Bond Funds depending on the amount and timing of the matching funds 4 The City of Denton is currently at Level Nine in the Commumty Rating S) stem of the National Flood Insurance Program Our flood plain management and subdivision regulation ordinances exceed the minimum requirements significantly Our community number is 480194 David Salmon is the current flood plain admuusttator Finally, all the land areas to be studied are either in the City of Denton or its Extraterritorial Junsdretion The PEC-4 basm is in the central portion of the incorporated area and 90%plus of the Cooper Creek basin is inside the City Limits If you need further information, please advise Sincerely, J D d Transportation 1 I � 4 a t ! a r f a„ it ail j , 1 �1 1 A 1 i t _ r ti ai i Ir ! I 1 r d ii 1 1 t t k i EXBprr G. { i PROOF DF NOTMCATION a 1 i r < a +1f y r ! 1 i✓ f *'d ! r � �$ r i r4+ —1 1 t y 1 !+ 1 r4 r 4 1 y t i f rt t fl ! a l y i ha I} q Xi r I �I 1 v } I fl, 1 I e II d i n r r I i I If , I Ij r II� Ilr ; I J Y 1 I I — I ' II 1 t li I i I r ikl rl � I - ' I I r I 1 i l I � I 1 l I 1 � 1 r I 1 i I ,I II t I 1 I r ' � 1 r 1 _ 1 I41 V { y r I L I r I .I' .-a--- 11) I 4 1 ! , r 1 1 r p1 I � 1 I + r I I � i i 1 I F r f F I� It a ' f I I i I r I 1 f I I I I f ( II } 4 � I _ 1 r I , 1 tl If 1 CITY OF DFNTON 2 15 E MCKINNEY ST DEMON TX 76201 8 1 7 566 8358 FAX 817-566-8236 August 24, 1995 Jack Wagner Acting Director of Public Works Denton County Public Works Department 306 N Loop 288 Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mr Wagner The City of Denton is submitting a grant application to the Texas Water Development Board for Flood protection planning The grant will address two regional areas that are within the jurisdiction of your political body They are as follows, 1 Cooper Creek Regional Detention This project will study and provide potential regional detention ponds on Cooper Creek to address existing and future flooding issues 2 Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 Flow Diversion Mitigation\Channel Improvements This project will study and provide structural channel and culvert improvements recommendations along the branch of Pecan Creek that runs from the northeast corner of UNT to Ruddell through Southeast Denton Please be advised that the recommendations proposed will be provided to you for your input and information during this planning process Any comments or concerns that you have would be forwarded to the City of Denton and Mr Craig Pederson at the Texas Water Development Board I would be happy to discuss the application with you at any time if you desire Sincerely, 'l1 C J4`'4 Clark, P E Director of Engmcering and Transportation JL Cr O a Z 772 284 795 Receipt for Certified Mad No Insurance Coverage Provided Do not use for International Mail (See Reversal Sent to Jack Wagner Street an 'T86 N Loop 288 PO Staand ZIP Code Benton TX 76201 Postage $ Camped Fee Special Deavery Fee Restricted Delman, Fee Return Receipt Showmg to Whom 6 Date DeWerad Return Receipt Showing to Whom Date and Addressee a Address TOTAL Postage a Fees Postmark or Date August 24, 1995 TWDBF Grant Applicati Letter N Is your RETURN ADDRESS completed on the reverse aide? aa a W .. ... c a ty o O fD n W O O H 'rr fir $ F w Z a r S46S rrr rr ppg� m s srA Z Ct P g0 D O 0 pQ CCOC dp 3R! g�HO f gy 8 s _ N cc19 ro H m o a s o� a y rr F+ Fh c P n &r ~ e r m v GD ❑v tq a r❑t 9 v € 5 2 Thank you for using_Return Receipt Service. CITY OF DENTON 2 15 E MCKINNEY 8T DENTON TX 76201 8 1 7-566 8358 FAX 8 1 7-566 8235 August 24, 1995 Dr Albert Thomas, PHD Superintendent of Schools Denton Independent School District 1307 N Locust Denton, TX 76201 Dear Dr Thomas The City ofiDenton is submitting a grant application to the Texas Water Development Board for Flood Protection planning The grant will address two regional areas that are within the junsdiction of your political body They areas follows, 1 Cooper Creek Regional Detention This project will study and provide potential regional detention ponds on Cooper Creek to address existing and future flooding issues 2 Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 Flow Diversion Mitigation\Channel Improvements Tlus project will study and providel structural channel and culvert Improvements recommendations along the branch of Pecan Creek that runs from the northeast comer of UNT to Ruddell through Southeast Denton Please be advised that the recommendations proposed will be provided to you for your input and information during this planning process Any comments or concerns that you would have would be forwarded to the City of Denton and Mr Craig Pedersen at the Texas Water Development Board I would be happy to discuss the application with you at any time if you desire Sincerely, Cl � J Director of Engineering and Transportation Z 772 284 793 ekReceipt for Certified Mad No Insurance Coverage Provided aw= Do not use for International Mall (Sea Rnvwrcal sent to Dr. Albert Thomas. PH street and Na 1307 N Locust P 0 State and ZIP Code Dent n T% 7.201 Poetega Cemimd Fee Special Debve FFee aeatncled Dslrvery Fae Return Receipt Showing to Whom a Data Delmaad Return Roc.IPt Showing to Whom Data and Addressee a Addi TOTAL Postage 6 Fees Is Postmark or Date August 24, 1995 TWDBF Grant Applicati Letter n Is your RETURP m � G cis ca is V 3 m' m W m J s s s tD t0 py� V m m> C as 3 N mn C 9 2 L as I ADDRESS completed on the reverse side w�3x t7r CutC �V „ a a rT n fr 0 I S E M z o 0 H Fes+ a � 8 O {7 q a 1-+ 0 (D 0 � M o t1 a. '.07 rt at z p g F 8 m k- n H (D P. 8 0Op(DH S £ u a� tr ($ r8 art M N r+0 N Fa 0 19 O n P. O D) �3 P. Pt (D M w g rt rn @@@ a a O C E R I. Q6 3 $ q 3 b g SSS j1. $ a » v ia rr8 m N D &r m 3 O V W n e o _ N $ ❑ ❑ m o D V c� e m o m y � N m 7 _ _ _ _Thank you for uslnq Return Recept Service _ _ j I , 5 r � 1 - , l 1 i ti i i a _ k EXHIBIT r 1996-2000 CAPITAL' IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM r ' ! I f � ! r j I s, tl 1 i IiII f t r f 1 i l I i r I I a it I r I I � I I I ! tl ! I i I , i r a 1 7 r I I' - I r h r J i I r i 1 t r I i �I E 1 1995-96 BUDGET CALENDAR January 17 - Tuesday Discusaan of pnonties Questionnaire with City Council City Council briefing on Capital Improvement Program January 20 - Friday Priority Questionnaire distributed to City Council January 27 - Friday City Council returns Budget Priority Questionnaire February 7 - Tuesday Review and discussion of Budget Priority Questionnaire results with City Council February 8 - Wednesday Public Utilities Board and Planning and Zoning Commisson hold Capital Improvement Programbishag to receive input from the corffiiumty regarding February 22 - Wednesday Staff Capital Improvement Program Budget kickoff March 10 - Friday Capital Improvement Program requests due in Budget Office for review and analysis March 15 - Wednesday General Government fifth year Capital Improvement requests are presented to Executive Committee for consideration jMarch 20 - Monday Executive Committee rminrigs of capital improvement projects due to Budget office March 23 - Thursday Executive Committee discussion of capital miprovement project priority rankings April 5 - Wednesday Public Utilities Board receives preliminary draft of Utilities Capital Improvement a Program. ulf�A April 7 - Friday Executive Committee reviews General Government requests formulating recommendation to be forwarded to Planning and Zoning Commission April 26 - Wednesday Public Utilities Board holds a work session to review Utilities Capital Improvement Program. May 3 -Wednesday Public Utilities Board final Utility Capital Improvement Program recommendation May 10 - Wednesday Planning and Zoning Commission discusses the Capital Improvement Program May 24 - Wednesday Planning and Zoning Commission holds a public hearing in a special meeting, and I considers recommendauoa June 6- Tuesday Recommended five-year Capital Improvement Program presented to City Council for consideration. September 12 - Tuesday City Council adopts Capital Improvement Program budget (first year of Capital Improvement Program) a� PA 4 1 *40 � � � UA U� � � � w U ( §§§§§§§§§§&§§ ga§§72§!G®q62 2 A§§%■§§§§§ §#!§§2§®q! N 1.1 § § m § 2 E I § §§ 2 ol2 �saasa»f�a■s s■■s��&ssCD0a , —¥ 1 y § § : ; a a ° + §■A§§§§§§§§§§§ \ A k4 � � � � I° $\ #E!B(§2E@ \§ , f « �, § � q® z ` j§ ,zz■ a <2 --J /z LU (\|d }\/� § §§§§§§k� 2§||B �k |moo as 2Q w DW� /;§§§§§C, §; E aI \f§§§§§§§§§)§§8 « y y, oo yA, §� K Z! ■ i > §§z § |§§2§IitsWE2 ■��y� ■■■k■■�■■■■■� O 1p O� O O O Oq O I Op o O p O 6 O O y O� Om p O O� V O E M 0 l' Kml r 8 �1 a t- z W 2 W O a i ti ��` .a••:ko�''3t 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Ptoleot r[tltt Proleet N Requesting De Estimated Cot s F Is this en upd, Project DescriptioNLado ocn Use City farces to reconstruct existing streets Reconstruction would include new asphalt pavement by bomagging and overlaying Concrete curbs and driveways will be repaired as needed Staff would recommend streets and deciding body would choose Project Purposaijustiflcation r repair not the whole street Also, some streets have poor asphalt Many streets in Denton have sections that are in pot conditions, but curb and gutter are acceptable Enables selection of specific major street repairs the actual year of the program Construction Fonalig, 1996-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999.00 Total Schedule ($7,000 St 0 Existing Bonds - issue 0 1 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 150 150 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 0 T Other 0 0 0 0 150 150 Total _ 1 Construction Futowig Total costs 01,0003i 1985-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998 99 1999 00 8 8 Services 142 142 Land (Right of -way) 0 Construction 0 Other 0 0 0 0 150 150 Total Operating Budget 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 199"0 Total costs 181,000's) 0 Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 6 Maintenance 0 t— Services 0 Debt Service 0 I Insurance 0 Fixed Assets p 0 p 0 Total 0 0 please list expected source of operating funds. 1 Will this lAAA03078 randt in anv amount annually a,. 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Titl9- MAYHILL/LOOP 288 CONNECTOR ROAD rack Selisd * Project Y° 0010-132 (MomAdYesrJ , a 4 ;pe lgn aid Cpnebt ct completed Reclueoft Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Feb-00 Apr-00 Estimated Cost $776,000 End Jan-00 Mar-00 Aug-00 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _ Yes _2L No Project Description/Location Construct a 45'-wide road with curb and gutter linking Mayhill Road with Loop 288 lust south of Russell -Newman plant Protect includes traffic signal at Loop 288 for $100,000 Project Purpose/Justification Provide alternative access to Billy Ryan High School, and potentially, the Denton County Government Center located on Market Street Would also provide potential access to FEMA Would reduce congestion at McKinney and Loop 288 and could eliminate some dangerous driveway maneuvers Construction Frmtgrrg 1 Schadub0111000151 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 Totel Existing Bonds - Issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 776 776 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 776 776 Construcdon Funding Costs (17,000'31 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1908.90 1999-00 Total Services 131 131 Land (Right-of-way) 0 Construction A45 545 Other 100 100 Total 0 0 0 0 776 776 Opereting Jw9st Costs 07,000's) 1995-96 199697 1997.98 1998.99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result in any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually X No 30A9 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ' REPAIR MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE DRAINAGE CHANNELS bpr�p��Itl9 C b".^<,:,4Tes3FSCbedp/ea `" t onseruct Completed Design aid 1, r 0810-82 flNdrrtlt/Yead > Begin Oct-99 Jan-00 Mar 00 q"11apt. > Engineering lietedCotE a $125,000 End Dec-99 Feb 00 May-00 b thk an update or revision of a current CIP Projects -- Yes X No E nl4ocaUon on els processonSMake major taff to provide repairsto recommendationsandxtong concrete nselectmpebody of specific locations to be made poor Justificationuired ke any t willtsupport channels Planare is t broken make repairs in severely toeavo d having toQcompletely arebuddslate�arrs is above what Construction puadlt - 1996.90 1996.97 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 Totalschedule 10,000 0 0 Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 125 125 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 0 0 0 126 25 Total construction 1'0041419, 8 1945.91996-97 1997-98 1998-99 199900 Tot �16,1 OgO,sTotal 2 12 Services 0 _ Land (Right-of-way) 113 113 Construction 0 Other 0 0 0 0 125 25 Total operating aadget 1995.96 199697 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs fd71000 4 0 Personal Services 0 r- Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 0 0 0 0 i Total 0 � c Pkase list expected source of operating funds VM tide project result In any savkgsi _Yes, approximate amount annually X No AAA0307E 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVSMffi1T PROGRAM Is this an ipdate or revision of a Current CIP Project? Yes X No Project DescriptiarVLocation This project will provide for the asphalt paving or resurfacing of parking lots located at Rack, Dents, and North Lakes parks Project purpose/justification This project will provide a higher quality of parking surface for the users as well as enhance the aesthetics of the parka CaanWion WAN 7995-% 1996-9T 19D7-98 199&�49 1999•+ZODD Total 0 0 Existing Bonds - issue Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 500 500 0 0 Aid in Construction 0 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 Soo 500 r trisLSon Flsdiro t 1995•% 1996-97 1997•9t, 1499 99 19994006 Total 40 40 Services 0 0 Lard (Right-of-way) 460 460 Construction 0 0 Other Total. 0 0 0 0 Soo 500 Do n 01Ing Budget IM46 1996-97 1997-95 7999.99 1999.2ow Total 11011) 0 0 Personal Services 0 0 Supplies 2 Rainterience 0 0 0 Services 0 0 )ebt Service 0 0 Insurance 0 0 Fixed Assets Total 0 0 0 0 2 2 Please list ted source of operattrig funds. :ity of Denton General Fund Operating Budget Witt this project result in any savings? — Yes, approximate a ourt amualty X No FBF/Blank 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS JIM eoFs` 0010-87z MO: s Design Bid <: gequesttrtgaDept, ? Engineering &Trans Begin Oct-99 Feb-00 r > Estimated Cost $219,000 End Jan 00 Mar-00 is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _ Yes X No consDuct Apr 00 Jun-00 Project Description/Location Project traffic control signals at two intersections to be determined in the project year Project Purpose/Justification Provide signalaatioin at intersections on an as -needed basis constntct/on Forra7(rry &be" 1,*1,Q00T� 199"6 1996.97 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bands 219 219 Aid in Construction 0 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 219 219 Construction Ftrrrdhg Costs (*1,000'sl 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 199899 1999-00 Total Services 37 37 Land (Right of -way) 2 2 Construction 180 180 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 219 219 OpereBng Budget costs (B7,00019) 1995-96 1996.97 1997.99 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 0 Insurance Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pieria list expected source of operating funds VM this project resutt in any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually X No 2E8E 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title PACE DRIVE DRAINAGE oa t rask sc�iedrdfs =' Project #4 o-ss IMonth/Yeert IOW6 Bjal Cortttrirct Cmirpfeted - Requesting Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Feb-00 Apr-00 Estimated Cost $963,000 End Jan-00 Mar 00 Sep-00 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project] _ yes -.2L No Project Description/Location - -- Construct a lined channel from the south end of Pace Drive south to McKinney Street New box culverts under McKinney Street and grass channel south of McKinney Street Project Purpose/Justification This entire area has exceptionally flat topography and floods during heavy rains Several homes have reported flooding Severe water damage to one home on the south side of McKinney Street Construction Funding schedule 011000 S1 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 Total Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 953 953 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 953 953 Construction Funding Costs /t 1,000s/ 1995-96 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Services 153 153 Land (Right-of-way) 50 50 Construction 750 750 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 953 953 Operating Budget Costs 07,000's/ 1996-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 reease nst expectee source of operating funds Will this 3078 result in any Yes, amount annually No 1996-2000 CAPITAL+ IMPROVM4]NT PRWRAM Park Bellfield Light Est!M%0 4 Cos 77 ECity list npaeted source of Operating fade Denton General fund Operating Budget Ms projectresult in arty swings? _- Yes, approximate amount annually AMOf FBF/Blank & Re )0 00 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title PECAN CREEK KERLEY TO MORSE Task Sch`adrde r� Project $ 0810-38 (Morrt7YYear) Design $Pd Construct Cor»pAsted Requesting Dept Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Mar-00 May-00 Estimated Cost $496,000 End Feb-00 Apr-00 Dec-00 ' Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? Yes �_ No i Project Description/Location Pecan Creek between Kerley Street and the Woodrow Lane bridge will be improved utilizing appropriate channel lining and culvert improvements Project Purpose/Justification The existing channel has severe capacity problems including all crossings and is not maintainable which restricts flow rates Consbuctfon FwK#ng Schad"le 1411,0005) 1995-96 1996.97 1997.98 1998.99 1 1999-00 Total Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 496 496 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 496 496 Cons&wflon Fwrd/ng Costs 07,00013) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-96 1998-99 19994110 Total Services 84 84 Land (Right-of-way) 2 2 Construction i410 410 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 496 496 Operaflng Budget Costs 07,000's) 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result in any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually X No 2E73 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM p,rOjept* TWO KERLEY STREET CULVERT 7 , rusk ScAedule Bld Construct Completed jtojec Al , 0810-65 (A/artltJl'ear! DesJgn h: r ,> Engineering &Trans Begin Oct 99 Feb 00 Apr-00 I `FtagltasUng Dept, g ��c�y $130,000 End Jan-00 Mar-00 Jul-00 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _ Yes X No project DescriptionlLocation Install new multiple box culverts under Kerley Street just west of Minor Court Project Purpose/Justification orm water runoff House at the corner of Kerley and Minor has flooded Existing multiple 36 inch pipes are inadequate to carry st on several occasions SClra Q0 1995-96 1998.97 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 Total 0 Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 130 130 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 0 0 0 130 130 Total ConstnJctkn fah#` 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs ($'7.000 s) s 22 22 Services 2 2 Land iRight-of-way) 106 106 Construction 0 Other 0 0 0 0 130 130 ' Total Operating Budget 1995.96 1996.97 1997.98 199899 1999-00 Total costs 01100015l 0 Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Faced Assets 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Vm We project result in any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually X No AAA03078 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project TWO OPTICOM SYSTEM Project l► 11',0010-134 /MoMhlYex! flisigt+' Bid roastrw- ,Ca»p�rted y Requesting,Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Jan-00 Mar-00 Estimated Cost. $50,000 End Dec-99 Feb-00 May-00 Is this an update or revision of a currant CIP Project? Yes Xy No Project Description/Location Equip up to 10 signalized intersections with an opticom system Project Purpose/Justification Allowc emergency vehicles to control traffic signals by remote control Reduce response times and provides safety to other motorists construction Fu 00W SchsdWe /*1,000'S/ 1995.96 199697 1991-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Existing Bonds issue 0 Authonzed/Umssued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 50 50 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 50 50 Consmuction Funa v Costs (d1,000131 1996-96 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999,00 Total Services 5 5 Land (Right-of-way) 0 Construction t 45 45 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 50 50 Operating Budget Costs (51,000,S) 1995.96 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result in any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually _)_ No 3088 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM E t Title SHADY OAKS DRAINAGE , . teak°seJ�d�a Bid construct 10810-31ept. Engjneenng &Trans BeginDec-99 Apr-00 Jun 00 st 14939,000 End Mar-00 May-00 Oct 00 is this an update or revision of a current CIP Projr 1 1 1 J Insurance Fixed Assets Total Description/Location Construct underground drain Yes No Project age and lined chann el from Dallas Drive to Duncan Street with pipes to Hill and Smith Streets with inlets Project Purpose/Justification Reduce drainage problems and enhance Willow Springs drainage project completed in 1991 and Chambers Street Drainage constructed in 1995 Will also reduce developm Consvuant costs of property between 135E and Dallas Drive ct/on FurMing Schedule (#7,000199fi•98 4996.97 1997-98 t998-99 1999-00 Total 0 Existing Bonds -issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 939 939 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds Aid in Construction Other 0 0 Total t onstructio0 0 0 0 939 939 m rzundMg Costs (#f,000's/ Services Land (Right of -way) Construction Other 199Cx88 1988.37 1987-98 t998-99 1999-00 Total 159 159 5 5 775 775 0 939 Total 0 0 0 0 939 Operaf/ng Budget , Costs (#1,000's/ 19 Personal Services 96.88 1996-97 1997-88 t998-99 1999-00 Total 0 0 Supplies Maintenance Services Debt Service 0 0 0 0 list expected source of operating funds WIN this project result in any savings? _ AAA02E72 Yes, on 01 0 1 0 amount annually 0 0 0 X No list expected source of operating funds WIN this project result in any savings? _ AAA02E72 Yes, on 01 0 1 0 amount annually 0 0 0 X No 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Tide WELCH AT HIGHLAND RIGHT -TURN LANE I Project # 0010-121 /A/&W#141g1114A r<, 1408AP Rid CoAarw Coptq(it/ad Requesting Dept Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Jan-00 Mar-00 Estimated Cost $23,000 End Dec-99 Feb-00 May-00 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? yes _.X_ No Project Description/Location Construct a right turn lane on southbound Welch onto Highland Street LINT has committed to dedicate necessary right-of-way Project Purpose/Justification Highland Street has high bus use due to LINT drop-off Will help get busses off of Welch Street more easily and improve traffic flow Construction Funding schedule01,0001s/ 1995.96 1996.97 1997.98 1998-99 1999.00 Total Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 23 23 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 23 23 Construction Funding Costs (d1,000'3/ 1995-96 1996-97 1997,98 1998.99 1999-00 Total Services 3 3 Land (Right-of-way) 0 Construction 20 20 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 23 23 Operating Budget Costs (l1,00015) 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998.99 1999.00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Please list r i , ( Will this pi source of operating funds result In any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually i No 3073 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project title ROSELAWN PAVING AND DRAINAGE (BERNARD TO CEMETERY) Task Sabaddo I 'f' Y 0010-136 � „�/���` Design B/d C6nxhv+ct Completed Prgject „, ��,y 10199 02/00 03/00 07/00 I iteWtis g slept, Engineering & Trans Bedn EstimatedCest $664,000 End 01I00 03/00 Os/00 08/00 I IP Protect? Yes X No b tMs en update or revision of a curcant CIV protect DascriptionlLocadon -) Reconstruct Roselawn Drive from Bernard Street to cemetery entrances as a 24 foot estate section road Would include proper cross drainage and driveway culverts l project Purpose/JustHicadon Existing road is very narrow and the pavement is in poor condition Provides main access to Roselawn Cemetery This project is in response to citizen request CO�'�oo Frodrtp 1g96-g#�' 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total I $�,,a" 01100010 0 Existing Bonds - issue, 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 664 664 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 0 Other p 664 664 Total 0 0 0 Conemlown Pwtdbtp 1996 965, 1998 9T 1897-98 1998.99 1999-00Tot ll Cosa 011000's/ 2 112 Services 20 20 Land (Right-of-way) $$32 532 Construction 0 Other 0 0 664 ssa i Total 0 0 � OpWstkw 9od9011, 1995 96 1996.97 1997.98 199899 1999-00 Total Costs lt7,000 sl 0 Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 I Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets p 0 Total 0 0 0 0 please Mat expected source of operating funds VM curs project result in any swings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually AAM2E7o 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title WEST WINDSOR DRIVE PAVING (OPTION 2) 7'eskScbeduk Project li 0010-88 /A!o»ti►rYeaf Design 8/d ComsJ wt Corilpieted. Raquestkfg Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Mar-00 May 00 Estimated Cost $439,000 End Feb-00 Apr-00 Sep 00 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _ Yes X No Project Description/Location Expand Existing Windsor to 4 lanes from Bonnie Brae to the recreation center and widen the 2-lane section from there to Hinkle Project Purpose/Justification Provide better and safer access to North Lakes Park and the surrounding neighborhoods Construction Funding se wuia 01,000'si 1996.96 1996-97 1997.98 1998.99 1999-00 Total Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authonzed/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 439 439 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 439 439 consbuction Funding Costs (87,0001si 1995-98 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Services 74 74 Land (Right-of-way) 0 Construction �65 365 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 439 439 Operedng Budget Costs (57,000's) 1995.96 199697 1997-98 1998-99 1999.00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service' 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result in any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually X_ No � HOE 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ProjeCtMidd RANCH ESTATES DRAINAGE xfMonthVl'eai} Design Bid Cansmrct, Completed 10810-18 s 1j�ssj<r1g apt,, Engineering &Trans Begin Nov 99 Apr-00 Jun-00 EsUmL6dccot $517,000 End Mar-00 May-00 Dec00 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _Yes X No Project Description/Location ® ® Lined channel from Hampton Drive to Hwy 380 with new culverts under Hwy 380 and Brass lined channel south of Hwy 380 i $5,000 for processing a Letter of Map revision through FEMA Project Purpose/Justification Will solve a localized flooding problem and remove several homes from the floodplam There are several instances of water entering homes Conshtictib" Fu sctaHtnlaxlif,000IS1>e< 199696 1996-97 1997-98 199Total5 199900 Tot 0 Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 517 517 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 517 517 Consmrctton Fundirr 1995-96' 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 199"0 Total Costflst,000's) 88 88 Services 15 15 Land (Right-of-way) Construction 409 409 5 5 Other Total 0 0 0 0 517 517 Dperaft Budget Total Costs 07,000BI 1996-96 1996-97 1997.98 1998 99 1999-00 0 Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 Please Hot VVIN this P AAA02E71 source of operating funds result in any savings? amount No 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NORTH LAKES PARK EXPANSION Project< 006329 /MorrthlPsaij,:„N'aealgn . Bld Cwxt&tiict.y` °,Cdnf*1 Requssig b9pt.`Q Parks & Recreation Begin 09/98 02/99 04199 Estimated Cost $1,500,000 End 02/99 04/99 01100 01/00 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _ Yes —2_ No Project Description/Location This project will allow for the expansion of approximately 20 acres at North Lakes Park This expansion will include additional soccer fields, parking, restrooms, and support facilities Project Purpose/Justification This project will allow the Parks and Recreation Department to keep up with the growth in youth athletics Constructhon Ftrrailrtp Scheduler{d7,00610 1996.90 1996-97 , 1997.98 1908.99 '1999 2000 Taw Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 1,000 1,000 Aid in Construction 500 500 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 1,600 1,600 Construction Frr wns Costs 1*1100019) 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999.2000 Tow Services 150 150 Land (Right-of-way) 0 Construction 1,350 , 1,350 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500 Operating Budget Costs 181,000W 2000.01 1996.97 1997.98 1998,99 1999.2000 Tow Personal Services 44 44 Supplies 6 6 Maintenance 26 26 Services 30 30 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 106 0 0 0 0 106 Please list expected source of operating funds City of Denton General Fund Operating Budget Nil this project result In any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually _ X No ZEBA 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM itle Construct Fuel Storage Facility Nrisk scheddo 0019-004 fMorrth yaw) Design Bid g Dept. Airport Begin 1999 1999 19 Cost 8488 End 1999 1999 I yes X No Revision Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project) i Construct Completed 1999 1999 1999 1999 ject Description/Location Per Master Plan nstruct Fuel Storage Facility rc project Purpose/Justification To meet E P A requirements by removing underground storage tanks Corutsust/on Forrdlnl? 19g5.gg > 1998.97 1997 98 1998.99 1999 R000 Total Schedule (tY,000"s) 0 Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 488 488 Other 488 488 Total Construcdon Fundny 19 g5 98 1998 9T 1997-98 1998-99 1889-2000 Total costs ttI,000`s/ Services Land (Right -of way) Construction Other Total Operating Budgett 1895-88 1998-97 1997.98 1998.99 1998-2000 Total Costs ft 1,000'st Personal Services Supplies Maintenance Services Debt Service Insurance Fixed Assets 488 Total :pjenexpected source of operating fundsoject result In any savings? _ yes, approximate amount annually X No IAAA030DO �* PA4 k 9 9 &�pp�^^�&8mm§§§§§§ N A 171 N a A I S W NS O& j� N§ O O O^ O 8O O 1(O� O (Op pO Oo O �O{ O {pO�� O O8 fmOp I OW N N W Wp t�l N� `• � Y N O Y f�l La 8 E n 0 q N 'ease aa�aaa"s"ease s —p p p_ pS Q <g p p S OF, 2w p� gp pp ,4-8-S O`8-8-8 S.8148 8 8 8 8 8 8 H O I I i I I I � I [ C I I I I I I I q I -8a aa&W'233a&aaa3a9 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project'nVe MASCH BRANCH ROAD PHASE I Task Schedule Project3F 001073 (8fan*yead �000!40 Bid Coiftrict Completed Requesting Dept Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Mar-00 May-00 Estimated frost $847,000 End Feb-00 Apr 00 Mar-01 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _ Yes -) _ No Project Description/Location Provide 27 foot road between Hwy 380 and Jim Chnstal Road including drainage and curb and gutter Project Purpose/Justification Provide improved access to 380 from industrial area around the Airport Construction Fundhtg SchedWe1$1,000S/ 1995-96 1996-97 1997-99 1998-99 1999,00 Total Existing Bonds - issue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 847 847 Aid in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 847 847 Construction Funding Costs (81,0001s) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999.00 Total Services 75 75 Land (Right-of-way) 64 64 Construction 708 708 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 847 847 Operoting Budget Costs ti1,000's/ 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-0o Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Nil this project result In any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually X No 30A9 ��s�gg�������R I tT O pgggga� kk m � o W co ew l+l l3 W PT Yf vvj goQ g8 g g g8 g g8 g8 gpp$pp gS g8 g8 g8 g8 O�p O gpp 6 88 g8 O O 88 O g8 g8 O O g8 O OD t9 O N m F W C4 of !J Iq W O 0p pqQ p1Q� oQ poQ poQ pQ oaQ Qp 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O pQ 8 C O pp O 8 8 O O 8 C 8 8 C O 8 O12 Ol N pj {J N F 4� `S W Z ru w w w Q W W W Z LL a z _ W W a2 5p W w r.=d T2 `QQQ `3 pZ N W (7 2 tlo~1 W O 3 w S- 6 O0g r m Ys o s d f> <ia 4 m G1 w It 2 a 3 IL vZ>>�r� �s'saaaaasa'ss'aaa'aaass§�s� O Q L% (gw (Sw (qw W (w (sw� (WSJ (LL'gJj (�fWy 1(ts�� W (SW% W W , rY� �0�`!Kn •VL 3Z 3Z 3Z 3� Z 3Z3 Z 3Gg 3Z gg Z 3Z 3�g s� s� S� 5� s� (p c.x < :� i88888888888888888a88888 �s'�` sItaaaaIta�>�a>kseai p i OD i N O n O O S S IJ 00 � a y a W l Ig& � N O IE F�HH8H8H88HH2S ii $$$$ saasag,8.S. 8, s$88 o a a 8 a a a a a a a a a a a a a "`!` 8888888888888$888888888 m ai �� of 888�8888$888$8881 �8�888�8 ' Z of cd i « 8 i ia�S$8811§nv;Nn.�� ,4 m Cd . cJ N a 5 W uias 3 io IL IL LU d d 82 2nCxW 11ttpp11 A (pV en 8 fps (0 UZ i r p O O O O O O O O S S O S O O O S S S S S S O N IE$$w$$$$:$�W $� 8888$8'8;8'8$888888888a8 8 W { i { { { { { ! { { i { i { { i { { 1 83g�8 8 S 8$ 8$ 8 8 8� 8 8 8 000000o| It 000000§ jmw ,�§ \ � £ m /~ 0000000 ƒ �§ k , © (|k|||$f .q2 � ■ k§ a§ \� / e§2 uj \\KBB �oo2K) LU \/§ ■§@! © >■ §®®■§§� �LU��\ LU §k§kk§§ 0 2`% c §2� $°f ■sass■■ 'r � 1 1 `1� ,1��•��,sj}`.. �j�jy2y5� 1i�5 k7pS 8'r 2�5j �$ ip5 2f 2S 2pS 2p5 FL ipf 25 2S p� 2S 2y5� 0 0 0 0 0 `R 11 l9 N N q W v P O O W i 'V,' k " W �> 2 Lu ° ;� CL g k }��}ryryYY CLo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'lam Q Q Q$ Q Q Q Q$ o Q Q Q 4§ Q o F 0 0 0 0 0 2g5 A$S i o R N z 2�S 2aS 2v 29 8 205 2 g$IP&§a!&§&4&Is§§§i§§b$ z z d JQ Q U O W ¢ i H z i p a F w a W �Wgru ww z4 W W N W {ll J S Q R C p 8 8 8 ffi 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ffi 8 8 ffi� 8 8 8 8 8 8 ffi ffi ffi� ffi ffi ffi g ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi� ffi ffi� ffi ffi ffi ffi 08-31-95 .06 31AM FROM FREESE & NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 1`001/003 i i•t OLS i Are tccnue ylvlation ,lion M amont Dams i plllways Drainage :tncal Engineering avlronrnont4 Science F4::t aFlood Levees canals chanical Engineering I Pipeltrie Design Plumbing Design Pump Stati+ Design Site Development Streets t1ccruls hways tructural Telewmr4Lations utilities Solid Waft �Fadlities ter Resource Planning rransmigsion Systems 40551nterriattonal Plaza, Suite 200, Fot t Worth, Texas 76109-4895 817/735-7300 FAX 817/7357491 FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET FAX NO.: (5121463.9893 DATE: August 31,1995 FROM: Mike Dollies Total number of pages, including transmittal sheet - PLEASE EXPEDITE TO ADDRESSEE COMMENTS: RE: CITY OF DENTON FLOOD GRANT APPLICATION Attached is a copy of the amendment to the flood planning grant application for the City of Denton The original will be sent to you in the marl and should arrive early next week Please call me if there is anything else that is needed Thanks for your help Skin J ay If there is a problem receiving any of these pages, please call our office at 817/735-7291 08-31-95 06 31AM FROM FREESE & NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P002/003 City APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT FOR THE COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND AND PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL UAPROVEWNT STUDY August 30, 1995 items should be noted regarding the application for flood protection plating grant for anon, Taxes The combined current unemployment rate for the planning area (both Cooper and Pecan creek watersheds) is 5 22% The combined current per -capita income in the planning area (both Cooper iI and Pecan creak watersheds) is $12,317 1) The work described in this item does not include preparation of a TNRCC permit Rather, the intent is to review the current TNRCC regulations associated with detention facilities and advise the City of Denton on the requirements to obtain a permit and any possible problem areas The work dead ibed in this Rem should be made to read "Assist the City with preparation of the necessary documentation to be submitted to the TNRCC for approval ofthe regional detennnn facility design " The intent is to compile the necessary data from the information generated during the study The intent of the work described in this item is to compile the floodphun information generated during the study in a manner that is acceptable to FEMA so that It can be included in a submittal to FEMA for a map revision The work described in this item does not include preparation of a Corps of Engineers 404 permit Rather, the intent is to review the current Corps of Engineers regulations associated with 404 permits and advise the City of Denton on the requirements to obtain a permit and any possible problem areas The intent of the work described in this item is to compile the floodplam information generated during the study in a manner that is acceptable to FEMA so that it can be included in a submittal to FEMA for a map revision Items II C and H D were combined into one item entitled "Perform Cost/Benefit Analysis„ 08-31-95 06 31AM FROM FREESE & NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P003/003 i E2RD1T C I I TASK 1 - COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY j CITY OP DKNTON T"A8 I OItw.4anfrows bal MNMM, h1I amp PROJECT PROJECT DOMIRINO WORD TASK OIaIM1E11 MANAGER ENGINEER T4CNNCIAN INIOC TOTAL 1 •rokhbom ♦ Nr • 61i • 61sa I so to obi 1mlen Padkr Mr 4 Is" 4 file 1 eg1 1 N70 CPIMA 1 eg0 a Iti I $ai DLied 1Aatlr I Ii / 11i a 12i E In aw MankV 1 Ip 2 too 7 6170 Pom L7101hmpw a elm 0 Sip 1 oM 110o~rJ^d WLamrmw 2 elm a AIM a i 16 $1 a00 i t 3i Ste! 94.103 hdrde 01 ed0OW Mao OV11 Agin 1 Ive a Igo 3 0170 dAp /MA KV-1 MNd1O 1 IN i7 .1 NO 11 It lip TDOwbadon ONI4n drhryr 2 6160 70 01si 30 11 710 MMmum $mop m MAW 1 0i 40 01A00 61 01 egoCw6wlbn SAMOAN I eggs 4 1320 1a 6644 1s II ON um Andrll0Y0rtrOr Arm Mrdl 2 fee 6eenrpordgo ma•6pdnll. 2 elm 12 TN0 14 0700 a OdWA Cemwbd NeMNNa 3 fife Ia 4N0 24 4612 71 11412 4 Pr./ eummry T4MIN WY 4 elm 3 $70 4 43" C rwlam Mril Aired. 0 Ism r Ia000 N It IN 4 Use 112 04.i7 D RellewT eCCtwN AwArl♦m. I 111a 2 0140 4 Iti 7 11eg a effort r40aNrroewMon 1 hrGM.n a 1230 4 4320 i7 it NO 32 11 a10 2 674 72 eg leg 2 R CM •off wl CIA, Al fly so I;Eve a Aim 466 6=,ON 1 A mpmTl CeadlaNleh M4e0np0 24 $1620 4o 11,100 34 6912 a $me so 14,0011 e ONantl ►ad D.deh If M.qi t D.m Lerpa 4 1600 a Ifp 24 61000 Is 021ve 2 him r Sralar a 4100 24 01 0ve 24 film 6 em paw" a *140 If 6Tve go 14N C RIAN ab6YMV Mdr 7 elm If 1720 Is lei 0 Prrro MINI CM admde 1 IN 4 live 6 else 4 "If I Allow a/TNRCC ►rmM Aveb6Mt 1 111E 2 efts 1 Nve 144 61e13 116 66107 P Mrwl mro"M CWMR RwPsr 2 0210 a 1720 26 II Ove 2 070 eg $1,704 0 Mfpn rrNrdh.raNal 1 a tr.wed. 2 1280 4 030 10 1720 14 Am 2 q1 p i1 SAf 2 Rwl m+wry "Al CRY t f 1 Is 160 171 4 010 1 47144 17 N NO 02040 TOTAL SALARY ]g It,il 114 film ti 0Ulm leg tests u tail 067 No ON McNeil Trl.♦I 14 Mq m City GRIM) $144 Trar II LIP to 0141 on Commit IuOO Iffws µ NI IN", m,ri 1763 Cow $4 R.ppn a Gee 36 Pp. OR Prdl Rrorl 1, OSC f0 rffw on 6 " 1000 1210mhedl 12i 1 V. At Pbl, 10 a" 2 &AMMde IN e 0 111, C♦dr, 10 iM. i 4.bnbM see arnd notes 1100 "IT abcorniteri 117,7E G.a1 wom'"0w .p oft 704unN070 I TOTAL PROJECT t74,888 tDrNMMmICOOPR1ad n C E N T U R Y O F S E R V I C E RRI NICNOLi August 31, 1995 Mr Gordon Thom Regional Planning and Research Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231 1700 N. Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78711-3231 Re: City of Denton Fund Grant Application Dear Mr Thorn: LSEP , ;M RLGION.: PLANNiNI Enclosed is a copy of the amendment to the City of Denton's grant application for Texas Water Development Board flood protection planning funding The changes we discussed in our previous telephone conversation have been made If there is any additional information needed for your consideration, please feel free to call Very truly yours, FREESE AND NICHOIS, INC. Nhchael J Delhes, P E Enclosure xc File (DTN95195-2 10) DTN95195rr V.EnTHORN 0011 Freese and Nichols, Inc Engineers Environmental Scientists Architects 4055 International Plaza Suite 200 Fort Worth Texas 76109 4895 817 735-7300 Metro 817-429 1900 Fax 817-735 7491 AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT FOR THE COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND AND PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL UAPROVEMENT STUDY August 30, 1995 The following items should be noted regarding the application for flood protection planning grant for the City of Denton, Texas Payee 7. Item 21 The combined current unemployment rate for the planning area (both Cooper and Pecan creek watersheds) is 5 22% Page 7. Item 22 The combined current per -capita income in the planning area (both Cooper and Pecan creek watersheds) is $12,317 Page B-3 item D The work described in this item does not include preparation of a TNRCC permit Rather, the intent is to review the current TNRCC regulations associated with detention facilities and advise the City of Denton on the requirements to obtain a permit and any possible problem areas Page B-4. Item E The work described in this item should be made to read "Assist the City with preparation of the necessary documentation to be submitted to the TNRCC for approval of the regional detention facility design " The intent is to compile the necessary data from the information generated during the study Pape B-4. Item F The intent of the work described in ttus item is to compile the floodplain information generated during the study in a manner that is acceptable to FEMA so that it can be included in a submittal to FEMA for a map revision Page B-6. Item D The work described in this item does not include preparation of a Corps of Engineers 404 permit Rather, the intent is to review the current Corps of Engineers regulations associated with 404 permits and advise the City of Denton on the requirements to obtain a permit and any possible problem areas Page B-6. Item E The intent of the work described in this item is to compile the floodplain information generated during the study in a manner that is acceptable to FEMA so that it can be included in a submittal to FEMA for a map revision Exhibit Items II C and II D were combined into one item entitled "Perform Cost/Benefit Analyses" EXHIBIT C TASK 1 - COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Prepaod BY Rowe AM MAIN* 9w SENOR PROJECT PROJECT ENCUMBER" YIORD TASK ENGINEER MAWGII ENGINEER TEQU3CIAN PROC TOTAL car wn .ow gar wrst ar I. RECONNAISSANCE A DATA COLL, A Cpprdndbn Medrq 4 NSO 4 $320 4 1100 1 qe 13 100e S Mot PoMlble O9MrAkn Ncety SIT. 4 0320 4 $ISO 1 i3e 9 163e C Crradndlon wAh FEMA 1 $00 4 oleo 1 1200 D C. nation with Local UOdst 1 $00 4 000 6 0260 E Cpadlut0 wlth CM On B. MOP" 1 ISO 2 AN 3 $170 F CoadsttO valor Surrey Supo bft 2 4160 0 1300 1 $36 11 1660 U C ,IW Mn wl Go,lod od Spbp get 2 aim 4 11121 4 $400 16 I7 200 a0 11 700 4 $162 63 $3162 S. CONCEPTUAL EVAWATXIN A Hyddo* And"W d S/Med Ghee 1 DdmAM Ordnge AMM 1 too 2 too 3 0170 2 MOONY EMdn9 FEMA HEG7 MOdolld 1 SSO 32 41 W 33 11 520 3 DMrmin DMipn DWOW9. 2 $160 36 11 420 30 $1 780 4 DMMmIm MCMmum page M S tAt 1 IN 40 $1 NO 41 $1 no 6 EvduM9 CarUuetlen Smrtdoe 2 $230 4 0320 12 too 1S 11 090 B Hydode Saestl Andm 2 IN 1 hputC PAGI DHohrpr Imo MWAe 2 $so 2 Cm Ws rAa wPwdq FOodpldn Dwo 2 1160 12 I540 14 "M 3 DdroMe COMINud F PIAIM 2 1180 12 ow 24 $912 as 11 012 4 Pmpro Summry TWe d R"AM 4 1100 2 178 0 /260 C Pedam Co ttBenNU Analyst 6 1670 26 12 000 86 $3 AM 4 $152 122 A6 6n 0 ROybw TNRCC Prmh R9rirmm9 1 We 2 $140 4 S180 7 1468 E Mpat RepretleNRMrerbrt 1 RAW hoprdon 2 $230 4 1320 32 11 440 32 it 216 2 170 72 13 282 2 Rovlow ~ng wl Chy { 8 70 1 3S lD 4 10 $1,150 47 $3760 282 $12 ON SO 622W 6 $190 404 130070 RI PRELIMNARY DE41ON A Prop Y Owns Cea*— Me My- 24 11 ON 40 Il SOD 24 $912 6 $W4 90 N 936 S DMemipn Pond Owen 13 Snrl 1 Drn SauMM9 Lwam 4 $460 0 OW 24 01 ON 36 $2100 2 Pdmwv SPIN." 2 $100 24 $1 060 20 of 240 3 Emr9emY SpNwry 2 $140 10 1720 1B 1880 C W. Hydfolo9YMYdrda 2 $ISO 16 $720 18 $800 D h9pr9RdminfYC4ME"mAO 1 $80 4 Also 4 $152 9 $412 E AWM CITY w/ TNRCC Pane Ap;Ac*Aw 1 $115 2 1IN a 13W 144 10472 ISO $6107 F Ropro InlamAdpO la MOMR Ro9ueM 2 i2a0 4 i320 24 It 2 76 32 11 706 0 Papat hoproaomhaweetlon 1 R9pW hgrdbn 2 $230 4 /320 16 7: i730 10 i00S 2 170 40 t1 964 2 RAVHw MoeOq wl CRY 240 S 70 1 138 0 4 0 61035 62 $4 ISO 178 $8010 1N $71" 13 64" w 12064S TOTAL SALARY 23 12 645 114 A9 120 AN 022 050 2" 19 424 22 0830 607 /44 075 EXPENSES Trovd 14 Tdpo w My Omow1 $144 Tnvd 11 Tdp tp SITd $36 Camper/CARD EXpe. M as$ Pdrw%1-"— $303 Co.M Repast 6 OBC 20 Pgst 619 hdim RAW 6 OBC 60 Pges $20 6 BoM Rms, 10 SM. 2 Subnade SM 1 VUlum hd 10 SM. 2 SubmMb $BO 6 Muslim Cppa 10 SM. 2 SubmAtde $30 OAnrd E9yrrA 1100 Bury" Wba r.* m 112 NO1200 ato WWIMd Suboorwhre la TOTAL EXPENSES IN 811 TOTAL PROJECT $741888 wim I IDTIMMIT 1000PSXW