Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 08, 2000 AgendaAGENDA DATE DEPARTMENT' ACM AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET August 8, 2000 Fiscal Operations Kathy DuBose ~ Fiscal and Municipal Services SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a discussion, and g~ve staff direction regarding the Denton Central Appraisal D~strmt's 2000-2001 Budget BACKGROUND The Texas Property Tax Code requires taxing jurisdictions to approve or disapprove their Apprmsal District budget within 30 days after its adoption by the Apprmsal District's Board of Directors The Appraisal District's Board of Directors adopted the budget on July 13, 2000 The City's contribution toward the Apprmsal District's 2001 budget ~s included in the 2000-01 proposed General Fund budget Staff recommends accepting of the 2001 proposed Denton Central Appraisal District's budget FISCAL INFORMATION The proposed budget contribution required by the C~ty of Denton is $8,079 greater than last year, (2000 allocation = $140,684, 2001 allocation = $148,764) The tax umt contributions are based on a percentage of each taxing unit's current year levy Respectfully submitted Diana G Orhz D~rector of F~scal Operations I II PAGE 1' PAGE 3 PAGE 4 PAGE 5 PAGE 6 PAGE 15 PAGE 24 PAGE 33 PAGE 42 PAGE 51 PAGE 60 PAGE 69 PAGE 78 PAGE 87 PAGE 89 PAGE 91 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 2001 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BUDGET LE~-rER SUMMARY OF REVENUE AND EXPENSE BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE PRIOR YEAR REVENUE AND EXPENSE BUDGET EXPENSE BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE PRIOR YEAR EXPENSE BUDGET EXPENSE BUDGET TOTALS BY DEPARTMENT DEPT #101 ADMINISTRATION - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #102 MAPPING - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #103 APPRAISAL SUPPORT - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #104 DATA PROCESSING - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #105 OVERHEAD - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #201 COMMERCIAL - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #202 LAND - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #203 PERSONAL PROPERTY - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES DEPT #204 RESIDENTIAL - EXPLANATION OF EXPENSES BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET CAPITAL EXPENSES SALARY SCHEDULE Notice Of Public Hearing On Denton Central Appraisal District 2001 Budget The Denton Central Appraisal D~strict w~ll hold a pubhc heanng on a proposed budget for the 2001 fiscal year The pubhc heanng w~ll be held on July 13, 2000 at 4 00 P M at 3911 Morse Street, Denton, Texas A summary of the appraisal distr~ct budget follows The total amount of the proposed budget $4,529 224 83 The total amount of increase over the currant year's budget $ 364,025 29 The number of employees compensated under the proposed budget 65 The number of employees compensated under the current budget 63 The appraisal district is supported solely by payments from the local taxing umts served by the appraisal d~stnct If approved by the appraisal distnct board of directors at the pubhc heanng, th~s proposed budget will take effect automatically unless d~sapproved by the governing bodies of the county, school distncts, cibes and towns served by the appraisal d~stnct A copy of the proposed budget ~s available for pubhc inspection in the office of each of those governing bodies A copy is also available for pubhc ~nspecbon at the appraisal d~stnct office Denton Central Appraisal D~stnct 3911 Morse Denton, Texas 76208 (940) 566-0904 [! D NTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DmTmCT 3911 MORSE STREET, P O BOX 2816 DENTON, TEXAS 76202-2816 June 14, 2000 To the Board of D~rectors and the taxing jurisdictions served by DCAD, the proposed 2001 Budget ~s hereby submitted The proposed Budget was completed ~n accordance w~th the requirements of Texas Property Tax Code Sec 6 06 All schedules and reformation required by Sec 6 06 are provided ~n the proposed Budget A public heanng w~ll be held on the Budget at 4 00 P M, on July 13, 2000 in accordance w~th Sec 6 062 and 6 062 In addition to the required schedules and Informat~on, the proposed Budget contains ~n depth and specific budget ~nformabon for each department The Ind~v~dual departments' budgets are also summarized at the front of the Budget Th~s approach should prowde the reader w~th substantial cost informat~on about each department We have attempted to prepare a rather comprehensive, yet succinct, Budget to m~mm~ze the reader's t~me ~n rewew~ng it In the 2001 Budget we are attempting to address a major issue that we are facing In recent years the loss of employees and the difficulty of replacing them has seriously ~mpacted the operetmns of the D~strict In addressing the problem, we have devoted the Increase ~n the 2001 Budget to personnel services The total of all sections of the 2001 Budget not related to personnel services ~s less than the total of the comparable sections of the 2000 Budget We began working on th~s ~dea over a year ago and have now Integrated it into the 2001 Budget The proposed 2001 Budget is $4,529,224 Th~s amount ~s $364,025, or 8 7%, greater than the 2000 Budget total of $4,165,199 As Indicated above, the $364,025 ~ncrease ~S all scheduled for personnel services The major changes in the 2001 Budget are d~scussed below We have added two new full-t~me employees One support employee will be added ~n the Land Department and one ~n the Appraisal Support Department The cost of the two new positions, ~nclud~ng benefits ~s $63,343 We have also added funding for add~tional part-brae labor ~n several departments at a total cost of $20,827 We are finding part-time employees to be qu~te cost effective The,largest increase ~n personnel services ~s a 5% salary mcrsase for all pos~t~ons The,total cost for this item, ~nclud~ng benefits, ~s $131,071 Further, salaries of certain positions ~n various departments were adjusted based on job d~fficulty and h~stormal employee turn over ~n the pos~t~ons These adjustments cost $64,735, ~ncludlng cost of benefits 1 PHONE (940) 566-0904 METRO (972)434-2602 FAX (940) 35%4824 Board of Directors and Taxing Jurisdictions Page 2 To further enhance our ability to retain employees, we are ~mprov~ng the Iongewty pay program Longevity pay has been $10 per month for each year of service Longevity pay will become $10 per month for each year of service for the first 10 years of service, $15 per month for each year of service after 10 years, and $20 per month for each year of service after 20 years The new Iongewty program will increase personnel services cost by $6,759, including benefits Our attempt to retain employees extends to ~mprov~ng the retirement program The D~strict ~s a member of the Texas County and D~stnct Rebrement System Full-brae employees are required to contribute 6% of their gross pay to the retirement program The District is currently obhgated to match the employees' contnbubons w~th a 2 to 1 contribution For each dollar the employee contnbutes the D~stnct ~s obhgated to contribute two The D~stnct's matching obl~gabon ~s being ~ncreased to 2 25 to 1 The D~strict's cost to enhance the rebrement program Is $47,437 for 2001 Another enhancement to the retirement program ~s funding for a COLA for 2001 The COLA w~ll cost the D~stnct $2,322, which ~s 0 098% of the salary budget The Texas County and D~strict Retirement System prowded the cost related information for the COLA and will admlmster the COLA The COLA ~s determined by a CPI that the Rebrement System provides The COLA prowded the rebrees by the D~stnct ~s not ~ntended to reflect the CPI as pronounced by the government We have also added workers' compensation coverage for the Board of D~rectors and the Appraisal Rewew Board The primary purpose of th~s insurance ~s to pay medical expenses should one of these board members sustain an ~n,lu~ wh~le adm~mstenng their job related duties In matters not pertaining to personnel services, we have added an overhead department This department ~s compnsed of budget items that are not specific to a particular department The major expenses m this department are payments to Appraisal Review Board members for services, general insurance, legal expenses, utilities, pnntmg, postage, building ~mprovements and maintenance, funding for a contingency, and debt payments The cost of allocating these expenses to the ~ndivldual departments would outweigh the benefit of doing ~t The add~bon of the overhead department does not add any expense to the Budget As indicated, the increase in the proposed 2001 Budget ~s for personnel services only The Appraisal D~strict is serving one of the fastest growing counbes ~n the state Economic growth coupled w~th a very t~ght labor market normally drives up labor costs Th~s is exactly what the D~stnct ~s expenenc~ng Staff~ believes the proposed 2001 Budget provides sufficient resources for the D~stnct to prowde the expected services dunng the 2001 fiscal year For your general information, we assume you may w~sh to make cop~es of the proposed 2001 Budget According~, we left the document unbound Joe Roll"ers Chief Appraiser SUMMARY OF 2001 REVENUE AND EXPENSE BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE 2000 REVENUE AND EXPENSE BUDGET CLASSIFICATION REVENUES FUNDING FROM JURISDICTIONS FUNDING FROM APPRAISAL DISTRICT TOTAL REVENUES 2000 2001 BUDGET BUDGET $4,165,199 54 $4,529,224 83 $0 O0 $0 O0 $4,165,199 54 $4,529,224 83, EXPENSES TOTALEXPENSES $4 165,199 54 $4,529,224 83 ACCT# 5100 51t0 5120 5130 5140 5150 5160 5200 5210 5220 2001 BUDGET ALL DEPARTMENTS ACCOUNT TITLE ~ERBONNEL SERVICES SALARIES LONGEVITY PAY SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) RETIREMENT {TCDRS) WORKERS COMP INSURANCE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE TOTAL 5100 PERSONNEL SERVICES EDUCATION & TRAINING MEMBERSHIPS SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES TRAINING SCHOOLS CONFERENCES ANDTRAVEL TOTAL 5200 EDUCATION&TRAINING 5300 SERVICES RECEIVED 53t0 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD 5315 OIL GAS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND UTILITY VALUATION 5320 GIB SERVICES 5325 LEGAL SERVICES 5330 AUDIT 5340 DEEDS SALES AND VALUE INFORMATION 5345 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 5350 GENERAL INSURANCE 5360 PRINTING SERVICE 5370 POSTAGE & FREIGHT 5380 LEGAL NOTICES & ADVERTISING 5390 OFFtCE SUPPLIES 5395 SALARY SURVEY TOTAL 5300 SERVICES RECEIVED 5400 5410 8420 5430 5440 5450 2000 2001 BUDGET BUDGET 550O 5510 5520 5600 5610 5620 5900 5910 5920 UTILITIES & MAINTENANCE OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE ELECTRICITY WATER SEWER & SOLID WASTE TELEPHONE BUILOING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE TOTAL 5400 UTILITIES & MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL 5500 CAPITAL OUTLAY MIBCELLANEOUS CONTINGENCY MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL 5600 MISCELLANEOUS DEBT SERVICE BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT DATA PROCESSING EGUtPMENT PAYMENTS TOTAL 5900 DEBT SERVICE TOTAL ALL DEPARTMENTS $2 126 799 31 $2 361 615 19 $48 810 00 $59 t15 00 $156 466 98 $174 083 27 $135 674 57 $208 18416 $25592~6 $20 648 87 $217 176 12 $255~130 20 $2 710 51994 $3 078 776 69 $12 438 50 $13 937 99 $64~815 00 $75 340 00 $77~253 50 $89~277 99 $45 000 00 $45 000 00 $41 685 00 $42 700 00 $0 00 $20 000 00 $160 006 00 $125 000 00 $6300 00 $6 300 00 $57 118 18 $59 121 38 $167 60034 $190 795 68 $20 228 00 $19 428 00 $84323 75 $75 026 53 $84844 00 $9655190 $9 000 00 $9 500 00 $51 829 00 $58 233 05 $0 00 $0 O0 $7271928 27 $747 65654 $16 326 85 $17 489 85 $162 022 00 $191 513 00 $47 260 12 $47 260 12 $34 069 22 $35 209 00 $34356 50 $36 146 50 $294~034 69 $329 618 47 $166 714 00 558 741 00 $38 500 00 $35 415 00 $205 214 00 $94 156 00 $70 000 00 $50 000 00 $6 900 O0 $6 900 O0 $76 900 00 $56 900 00 $73 349 14 $73 349 14 $0 00 $59 490 00 $73~349 14 $132~839 14 $4 166119854 $4r528,224 83 2001BUDGETSUMMARYSHEETBYDEPARTMENT 2001 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET JURISDICTIONS SCHOOL DISTRICTS S01 ARGYLE lSD S02 AUBREY lSD S05 DENTON lSD S07 KRUM lSD S08 LAKE DALLAS S09 LEWISVILLE lSD SI0 LI'I~LE ELM ISD SIl NORTHWEST lSD SI2 PILOT POINT ISD SI3 PONDER ISD SI4 SANGER ISD SCHOOL DISTRICFS TOTALS GOI DENTON COLrNTy CITIES C26 CITY OF ARGYLE C01 CITY OF AUBREY C31 TOWN OF BARTONVILLE C03 CITY OF THE COLONY C04 TOWN OF CORINTH C27 TOWN OF COPPER CANYON C05 CITY OF DENTON C30 CITY OF DOUBLE OAK C07 CITY OF FLOWER MOUND C22 TOWN OF HACKBERRY CI9 TOWN OF HICKORY CREEK C08 CITY OF HIGHLAND VLO C09 CITY OF JUSTIN CI8 CITY OF KP~UGERVILLE CI0 CITY OF KRUM C11 CITY OF LAKE DALLAS C25 CITY OF LAKEWOOD VILG C12 CITYOF LEWISVILLE C13 CITY OF LITTLE ELM C23 CiTY OF MARSHALL CRK C33 CITY OF NORTHLAKE C24 CITY OF OAK POINT CI4 CITY OF PILOT POINT CI5 CITY OF PONDER C17 CITY OF ROANOKE C16 CITY OF SANGER C34 TOWN OF SHADY SHORES C28 CITY OF TROPHY CLUB CITIES TOTALS % OF DENTON OUT OF 2001 1999 TOTAL COUNTY COUNTY BUDGET TAX LEVY I~EV[ES CHARGES CHARGES ALLOCATIONS $5,765,726 52 1 4983% $66,635 11 $66,635 11 $2,455,589 67 0 6381% $28,379 51 $28,379 51 $56,421,583 83 14 6615% $652,070 18 $652,070 18 $1,834,07980 04766% $21,19665 $21,19665 $8,369,431 63 2 1748% $96 726 40 $96,726 40 $154,555,659 65 40 1622% $1,786,216 02 $1,786,216 02 $3,807,725 16 0 9895% $44,006 28 $44 006 28 $31,649,210 88 8 2242% $365 773 26 $67,121 00 $432,894 26 $3,264,418 91 0 8483% $37,727 23 $14,086 00 $51,813 23 $1,446,463 53 0 3759% $16,716 93 $16,716 93 $3,526,502 24 0 9164% $40 756 16 $40 756 16 $273,096,391 8~1 70 9657% $3,156,203 73 $81,207 00 $3,237 410 73 $43,944 442 85 11 4192% $507 870 55 $507 870 55 $558,260 35 0 1451% $6,451 87 $6451 87 $199,11048 00517% $2,301 14 $2301 14 $156,662 74 0 0407% $1,810 57 $1,810 57 $6,732,783 51 1 7496% $77,811 49 $77,811 49 $3,166,392 99 0 8228% $36,594 34 $36 594 34 $109,010 98 0 0283% $1,259 85 $1 259 85 $12,872,072 82 3 3449% $148,763 90 $148,763 90 $362,528 35 0 0942% $4,189 78 $4 189 78 $13,162,251 74 3 4203% $152,117 53 $152,117 53 $13,923 57 0 0036% $160 92 $160 92 $401,994 90 0 1045% $4,645 90 $4,645 90 $4,561,989 38 I 1855% $52,723 39 $52 723 39 $303,672 27 0 0789% $3,509 57 $3,509 57 $48,457 33 0 0126% $560 03 $560 03 $132,099 89 0 0343% $1,526 69 $1,526 69 $1,022,29588 02656% $11,81478 $11,81478 $59,345 65 0 0154% $685 86 $685 86 $15,632,956 34 4 0623% $180,671 72 134 00 $180,805 72 $351,846 52 0 0914% $4,066 33 $4,066 33 $10,091 39 0 0026% $116 63 $116 63 $83,294 57 0 0216% $962 64 $962 64 $410,211 64 0 1066% $4,740 86 $4,740 86 $509,401 08 0 1324% $5,887 20 $5,887 20 $45,749 46 0 0119% $528 73 $528 73 $533,830 11 0 1387% $6,169 53 $6,169 53 $566,795 48 0 1473% $6 550 52 $6,550 52 $226,80251 00589% $2,621 18 $2,621 18 $ 1,733,604 35 0 4505% $20,035 45 $20,035 45 $63,967,436 28 16 6223% $739,278 40 $ 134 O0 $739,412 40 87 2001 BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET JURISDICTIONS SPECIAL DISTRICTS W04 CLEARCREEK WATERSHED AUTHORITY W07 CORINTH MUD F01 DENTON COUNT%* FIRE DISTRICT L01 DENTON COUNTY LEVY IMPROVEMENT DIST gl W05 TROPHY CLUB MUD #2 RUD DENTON COUNTY ROAD & UTILITY DISTRICT gl W03 TROPHY CLUB MUD #1 WI0 DENTONCO FRESH WATER D[ST #lB WI I DENTON CO, FRESH WATER DIST # I C WI2 DENTONCO FRESH WATER D[ST #ID SPECIAL DISTRICTS TOTALS GRAND TOTALS % OF 1999 TOTAL TAX LEVY LEVIES $21,578 71 0 0056% $223,000 55 0 0579% $82,612 75 0 0215% $183,852 52 0 0478% $658,165 88 0 1710% $1,280,010 84 0 3326% $878,452 26 0 2283% $324,177 70 0 0842% $1,970 58 0 0005% $166,552 77 0 0433% $3,820,374 5~4 0 99270/0 $384,828,645 48 100 0000% DENTON OUT OF 2001 COUNTY COUNTY BUDGET CHARGES CHARGES C_~ $249 39 $249 39 $2,577 24 $2,577 24 $954 76 $954 76 $2,124 80 $2,124 80 $7,606 49 $7,606 49 $14,793 22 $14,793 22 $10,152 37 $378 68 $10,531 05 $3,746 56 $3,746 56 $22 77 $22 77 $1,924 87 $1 924 87 $44,152 47 $378 68 $44 531 15 $4 447,505 15 $81 719 68 $4 529 224 83 88 Ao~nda No,~ A~enda Itsm /*¢2,~ ~--~ AGENDA INFORMATION S~iEET AGENDA DATE DEPARTMENT ACM' August 8, 2000 Utthty AdrmmstraUon Howard Martin, 349-8232 $1~IBJECT Receive a report and hold a d~scuss~on concermng the future dnunage project ~n the Stroud Street area Flooding m November 1996 resulted m three fatahttes ~n the C~ty of Denton This prompted engineering studtes of the Pecan Creek Watershed and ulttmately proxaded the bas~s for the PEC- 4 channel tmprovements from Bell Avenue to Woodrow Lane The Pecan Creek Master Plan was prepared by the engmeenng firm Teague, Nail & Perkins During the Lmtml engmeenng study, public involvement centered around the need for drainage ~mprovements to protect pubhc safety Tins study evaluated the channel tmprovements necessary to contmn floodwaters assoctated w~th a 100 year storm These enlpneerm8 studies tdenttfied the channel s~ze necessary to convey 100 yoar storm floodwaters and structures that would need to be purchased to construct the drainage ~mprovements Federal funds were available to voluntarily purchase homes m floodways thereby reducing flooding threats to people and property tn these areas The Ctty apphed for and was awarded funding to purchase two properUes tn the floodway Two propertaes have been purchased, one at 300 Stroud and the other at 301 Sycamore Councilmen Cochran has requested a pubhc mceUng concertnng the future droanage ~mprovements m flus area Please see attached memorandum to Mtke Jez (Exinba I) Currently, no capital ~mprovement dollars have been tdentflied for tins project m the 5-year planning window Neighbors xn the Stroud Street area held a meeting on June 1, 2000 to d~scuss the proposed droJnage maprovements for their area The drarnage dw~ston attended tins meeting to answer quemons We dtscussed the fact that we would be conducting a flmshed floor survey m thts basin to dotermme the most cost effectwe and least culturally dasruptable drainage maprovement approach possible Data proxaded by the fimshed floor elevatton survey ~s the first step m addressing the concerns of the neighborhood We assured the neighborhood that we would mvolve them m the process by contaoUng Mr Robert Hughes when the fimshed floor elevaUon survey ~s complete Prior to moving forward wath the project, opttons will be presented to the neighborhood and C~ty Council for consideration Engineering calculations md~cate that floodwaters wtll be 28" deep over Sycamore Street at the creek crossing and 20" deep over Stroud Street dunng a 100-year storm event The fimshed floor survey wall provide the necessary data to deternune the extent of channel ~mprovements We attempted to address the ~ssues rinsed by the c~t~zens at the 8/1/2000 C~ty Council meeting (Extub~t V) OPTIONS; No Actton, Allow flooding ~n the area to conttnue and continue to dose Carroll Blvd durmg certmn rainfall events Accept risks to pubhc health, safety and welfare Homes damaged beyond 50% of their appraised value by flooding, fire or other natural disasters cannot be rebmlt m the floodway and those homes m the floodplain would have to be elevated 2 0 feet above the 100 year water surface elevation Evaluate drmnage options to reduce flooding potential Reduce risks to pubhc health, safety and welfare Provtde a passable North South thoroughfare during storm events RECOMMENDATIONS: No formal City Council acUon required at tins tune We will continue to meet w~th the neighborhood to discuss these issues as reformation becomes available We would request that the next meeting be held after the fimshed floor survey ~s completed Tins will prowde addmonal mformataon on the nature of the drainase improvements needed We will investigate the possibthty of mdudmg the Elm Street dram. age issues as a pan oftbas project PRIOR ACTIONfR~VIEW fCoun¢il. Boards. Commissions): Property purchases were approved at prewous City Council Meetings FISCAL JI~'ORMATION: N/A MAP. Stroud Street vm~mty floodplatn map Respectfully subtmtted Howard Mart~ - X Assistant C~ty Manager Utilities Jim Coul~ Assistant Dtrector Wastewater Utflmes Exinblt I Exinblt II, m Exhibit IV Exinblt V Exinblt VI Memorandum to Mike Jez Carroll Blvd Photos Neighborhood Meeting A~enda Response to Neighborhoods Concern Stroud Street Flood Map WA TER UTILITIES 901-ATcxas Street Denton, TX 76209 (940) 349-8452 Fax (940) 349-7334 MEMORANDUM To From Date Subject M_rice Jez Jim Coulter ~Iuly 27, 2000 Stroud Street e-rural from Make Cochran In response to the e-mini you received from Councilman Cochran, please consider the following mformaUon In the first paragraph Mr Cochran stated that the project ts to mcrease the floodway The goal of our drainage projects is to reduce the area needed for the floodway thereby reducing flooding hazards to those residences and businesses located tn flood hazard areas The reason that the water runs into the street is that upstream at Carroll Blvd the water over tops the road due to inadequate channel and culvert capacity and flows down the low lying streets in the area Please see attached photos (Exinint II & HI) The channel m flus area can carry a two year storm event, as you can see the water is leaving the channel at Carroll and spreachng out m the floodway Two cars were stranded and the road had to be closed In the last six years we estimate that the crossing pictured m the photos has been closed at least 15 times As I explained at the June 20, 2000 City Council meeting, our current plan is to gather addmonal mformatmn on the fimshed floor elevations m the flood hazard areas to deterrmne the most efficient means to prowde flood protection I explained tins to the neighborhood association m our June 1, 2000 public meetang (Exinint IV) We understand the Instonc preservation issues associated wnh the neighborhood and the channels constructed in the WPA era We will endeavor to balance public safety and Instoneal and cultural aspects of the neighborhood If the only issue that we were dealmg with m tins area was the potential flooding problems in the Stroud Street area and the neighborhood d~d not desire flood protection we would be happy to put the resources rotc other areas However, tins channel conveys water under and dunng certoan storm events over Carroll Blvd Improvements to tins channel and the creek crossing on Carroll Blvd and other creek crossings on Carroll will provide a passable North South thoroughfare through Denton Dunng 2 year storm events and greater flus creek crossing becomes impassible due to ingh water It ts important to public health safety and welfare that emergency veineles be able to transit tins cnUeal thoroughfare dunng storm events Droanage improvements m flus area will reduce the risk of veincles bemg washed into the channels EXHIBIT I Page 2 Our goal Is to work closely w~th this neighborhood m developing satisfactory solutions to the drainage issue I respectfully request that we wmt to hold any additional meetings until after we have surveyed the fimshed floor elevations in this area This will prowde additional information to the neighborhood that we were unable to present at our last meeting Respectfully, hm Coulter Assistant Director Wastewater Utilities EXHIBIT II Agenda for 6/1: 7:30-7:45 > Greetings (meet a neighbor that you don't already knowl) 7:45-8:00 > Introduce ,Tim Colter and let him speak on behalf of the ¢~ty. 8:00-8:30 > J'~m Colter address questions and concerns 8:30-8:45 > Wind up the meeting Neighbors: Thank you so much for being here tomght Your ~ls very ~mportant As you hsten to Mr Colter speak, jot ~Zfi'~est~ons/concerns that come up for you and present them at the approprmte t~me When you go home, thmnk about how we can achieve our goal of preserving the integrity of the neighborhood while also allowing the City to accomphsh them goal of addressing the flooding problems Please gather mnformat~on for the next meeting (to be announced), ~ e before/after photos of newly remodeled houses, names/addresses of former residents who m~ght be interested m this ~ssue (if they are not interested, maybe they know another former resident who would be eskl), and hfe stories/history of the hood And if you know neighbors~landlords who are not present at tomght's meeting, please leave us their name/address or contact them yourself to reform them of what we discussed and how they con get revolved EXHIBIT IV Our Questions and Concerns: What exactly is the expansion of the Pecan Creek Drainage Dtteh tn our netghborhood going to aceomphsh? t~xactly what problems wtll be allevtated/solved by thts expansion9 Whtch propertms tn our area and in other areas will no longer flood? Please quanttfy for us, (through reports, etc ) exactly whtch homes and busmesses in our area have had FEMA clmms paid ~n the last 10 years Does thts take us out of the flood piton, alleviating our need to pay for flood msurance? Please ~pell out clearly the plan, as tt stands right now, for the d~tch/netghborhood ~tdth Path Which properties wtll be directly affected and how9 Several buddings (garages, sheds, etc ) wall have to be tom down tn the process Wdl residents be allowed to rebmld9 When wtll these restdents/bustnesses be nottfied of the Ctttes retentions9 How will restdents be compensated for property/bmldtngs that are lost9 WA TER UTILITIES 901-ATcxasStreet Denton, TX 76209 (940)349-8452 Fax(940)349-7334 At the August 1, 2000 City Council Meeting residents spoke to the Council concermng issues related to the Pecan Creek Project We have tried to address the issues raised by the neighborhood Request that we reevaluate the Pecan Creek Plan The fimshed floor elevation survey will provide the necessary information to evaluate the nature of the drainage maprovements required and to provide the neighborhood and the City Council options to consider Evaluation of traffic issues dunng tho drmnage study Traffic counts were used by the consultant as the basis for the recommendatmn of road closure Pedestrian traffic was not evaluated m the study Possible solutions include installation of a pedestrian bridge or reconstruetaon of street crossing 3 Concerns about the number ofpropert~es to be tmpacted to complete the project The fimshed floor survey will provide m. formation on the extent of drainage unprovements and resultant risk to property and pubhc safety 4 Concerns about the removal of trees The drainage department is vepJ concerned about the preservation of trees The benefits oftrees to the quahty of hfe, the reduction m runoff due to vegetative cover, and the reduetaon of mr pollution are well documented Wewfll endeavor to preserve as many trees as possible dunng any drainage project Concerns about the purchase of the homes in advance of the project The homes were purchased using federal funds to remove structures from the hazards of a floodway 6 Concerns were expressed that the real problem is street drainage As we have shown w~th the pictures of Carroll Blvd there is a s~graficant drainage problem in this area over and above street drmnage problems Storm water leaving the channel at the Mulberry Carroll Blvd mtersectaon ~s actually contributing to the street drain problems 7 Concerns were expressed about bvmg next to vacant lots The drainage department will commlt to hinng a landscaping contractor or worlang out an agreement with the neighbonng property owners for the use of the property in exchange for maintanance s Concerns about street sweeping m this area Since 6-1-99, Stroud Street has been swept 3 times If the projeet does not happen then the homes were purchased needlessly If the project does not happen then at least two households will be spared the potential despair and financial problems assocmted w~th serious floochng lo Maintenance problems associated with clogged grates Currently dunng heavy rains drainage crews as well as many other departments are occupied closing flooded streets throughout the City The inlet issues in this area will be addressed at the time of drainage channel improvements EXHIBIT V CARROLL, · ~rT--~ ~' ~' "~' '~'' ~" '~: ..... /' Stroud Street & Pecan C reek FIoodplmn/Floodway ~rea ~ap~ . . ~.~ [ AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Aoenda No.~ Agenda Item ./.~/.,~ AGENDA DATE: DEPARTMENT: CM/DCM/ACM: August 8, 2000 Utilities Customer Service ACM - Howard Martin ACM Questions concermng tlus acqmslt~on may be chrected to Susan Croft349-8199 SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a d~scusslon, and give staff direction regarding a current contract with Greater Denton Arts Council (GDAC) BACKGROUND The Greater Denton Arts Council (GDAC) has requested that thc City revise and update the schedule authorizing the City to reimburse GDAC for the utilities used by the Campus Theatre Under the~current agreement, the City reimburses GDAC for utilities used within reimbursement limits provided by the agreement Two prior amendments to this agreement occurred on August 20, 1991 and January 21, 1997 In addition, GDAC is requesting that the City reimburse GDAC for a stun of $10,691 42 Tlus amount represents the difference between the actual expenchture by GDAC and the amount reimbursed by the City for fiscal years ending 1997, 1998 and 1999 PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Couneil, Boards~ Commissions) On October 15, 1990, the City of Denton and GDAC entered into an agreement, providing for payment of funds by the City to GDAC for rmmbursement of Campus Theatre utilities This agreement was amended on August 20, 1991, and January 21, 1997 FISCAL INFORMATION The amendment as requested by GDAC, would increase the City's annual conmbutlon by $2,000 to $5,000 The dollar affect will vary depen&ng on rate changes and actual usage The amount of $10,691 42, whtch represents a three-year difference in actual costs and reimbursement amounts, would impact the current budget by the stated amount Respectfully subrmtted dW~.~ ~ Mal~ln ~ Assistant City Manager - Utilities Prepared by Susan Croft ~ 0 -- Utflltles Services Manager Schedule of GDAC Expenditures vs C~ty Reimbursement Year Actual Amount Amount Reimbursed Difference 1996-1997 33~477 99 32~468 28 1~009 71 1997-1998 35~062 94 30~324 00 4t738 94 1998-1999 33~337 12 29~116 68 4~220 44 Gas - 1997 to 1999 6~162 47 5~440 14 722 33 TOTAL $108~040 52 $97~349 10 $10~691 42 AGENDA DATE DEPARTMENT ACM AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET August 8th 2000 Planmng/& Development Department Davtd Hdl, 349-8350 Dm SUBJECT Recmve a report, hold a dtscuss~on, and gtve staff dtrect~on regarding potential annexation actions for the Ryan Road area BACKGROUND The Ctty has recently recetved two mqmres to voluntardy annex property tn the Ryan Road area The Denton Independent School D~stnct (DISD) has submttted a voluntary annexanon pet~tton for the elementary school site on Ryan Road The nearest ctty hm~t hne adjacent to thts s~te is on the north stde of Ryan Road at the Estates of Forest Rtdge When the Estates of Forest R~dge was developed, the northern port~on of ROW for Ryan Road was dedicated to the county The portton of Ryan Road not currently In the ctty hmlts Is a prescriptive ROW, meamng that the adjacent property owner actually owns to the center of the road The City and DISD staff have coordinated the prows~on of utthttes to the s~te, the eqmtable cost sharing of those facd~tles is currently being determined DISD has requested that prior to the annexation, the C~ty's Budding Inspections D~ws~on perform inspections at the new Wayne Ryan Elementary Staff ~s prepared to perform the inspections as requested unless instructed otherwise by Council Mr Mark Weatherford of the Weatherford Company has d~scussed w~th staff a proposal to develop an approximately 120-acre parcel m the general area that ts currently undeveloped To date, no formal apphcatlon has been filed and Mr Weatherford may have the property under contract rather than owning the property outright Because a plat could be filed that would vest lot sizes, the matter is being brought to Councd's attennon The property betng considered by Mr Weatherford ts located at the northeast comer of Country Club Road and H~ckory Creek Road The proposal is to develop a single-family and commercial project The property ~s not adjacent to any current c~ty boundary hne The subject property is within an area ~dentffied m the Denton Comprehensive Plan as a Community M~xed Use Centers Area The majority of the property is w~thln an Environmentally Sensitive Area In accordance wtth Section 34-35 of the City's Code of Ordinances, the C~ty will "assess on a case by case basis the annexation of areas tn the extraterritorial junsdmt~on (ETJ) when slgmficant developments are proposed, occurring, or likely to occur tn the near future" In addttlon, Section 43 021 of the Local Government Code authorizes a home rule c~ty to annex area adjacent to the City PRIOR ACTION Councd has not prewously constdered thts item ESTIMATED PROJECT SCHEDULE Unttl the ~ssue of conttgmty ts resolved, the DISD Wayne Ryan Elementary School annexatton petition cannot be processed FISCAL INFORMATION The developer will be required to make public improvements on this site at the time of final plat approval, including water and wastewater line extensions, drainage system improvements, the dedication of road right-of-way, access and public street improvements, including sidewalks, and public utthty easements The private development will result in increased public revenues, both private and public development will result In increased public costs Most public service entities are directly or indirectly affected by the proposed development OPTIONS 1 Broad Annexation Strategy The City could proceed with a broader annexation strategy for the area that could include both of the discussed properties The Weatherford Hickory Creek / Country Club site can only be annexed by Including other properties between the current city boundary and the site A broad annexation strategy could provide for unified responsibility for the maintenance of Ryan Road, which will become increasingly important due to ~ncreased school-related traffic Involuntary Strip Annexation Strategy A strip of property 1,000 feet w~de would have to be annexed due to provision of the Local Government Code, ~f the petition is involuntary Voluntary Strip Annexation Strategy The property owner to the immediate east side of school site (Mrs Ryan) would have to volunteer to dedicate 30' (southern ROW of the street) to the city all the way to thc school site The City could then petition that this strip bc included into the city limits along with the school s~te A strip of property 1,000 feet wide would not have to be annexed due to provision of the Local Government Code that exempts voluntary annexation requests from the minimum width requirement RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that a broader annexation strategy should be perused to eliminate fragmented road maintenance responsibilities to prowde safe and efficient access to the school As development interest continues m the area, other properties may be platted before annexation can be initiated ff a case-by-case strategy continues to be used ATTACHMENTS I Location Map 2 Utthtles Map espectfully subml d Douglas~ Powell, AICP Director of Planning and Development NORTH LOCATION MAP Scale None NORTH Legend Water Lines by Diameter 15 20 21 42 Sewer Lines by Diameter 19 24 25 33 UTILITIES MAP Scale None AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET / AGENDA DATE DEPARTMENT: ACM August 8* 2000 Planning & Development Department David Hill, 349-8350 SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding potential annexation actions for the 1-35W / U S 377 area BACKGROUND Ivh' Charles Jowell of Vintage Development, Inc has discussed with staff a proposal to develop an approximately 30-acre parcel that is currently undeveloped To date, no formal application has been filed and Ivlr Jowell may have the property under contract rather than owning the property outright Because a plat could be filed that would vest lot sizes, the matter is being brought to Council's attention Staff's understanding is that Mr Jowell intends to develop a single-family project with minimum lot sizes of approximately 7,500 square feet The property is adjacent to the Vintage development and therefore adjacent to a current c~ty boundary line The subject property is within an area identified in the Denton Comprehensive Plan as a Neighborhood Centers Area A portion of the property is also within an Environmentally Sensitive Area In accordance vath Section 34-35 of the City's Code of Ordinances, the City will "assess on a case by case basis the annexation of areas in the extraterritorial jurlsdmtlon (ETJ) when significant developments are proposed, occurring, or likely to occur ~n the near future" In addmon, Section 43 021 of the Local Government Code authorizes a home rule city to annex area adjacent to the City PRIOR ACTION The subject property is located in area previously considered for annexation In 1999, when the Willow Lakes West property (US 377 and Crawford Road) was annexed Council decided against annexation by a vote of 5-2 (approval of annexations reqmres a super-majority vote) ESTIMATED PROJECT SCHEDULE No schedule vail be prepared for annexation of the property unless so Instructed by Council annexation process typically requires 90 -120 days for completion The FISCAL INFORMATION The developer vail be required to make public ~mprovements on this site at the time of final plat approval, including water and wastewater line extensions, drainage system improvements, the dedication of road right-of-way, access and pubhc street improvements, including sidewalks, and public utility easements Development will result in increased public revenues and pubhc costs Most pubhc service entities are directly or indirectly affected by the proposed development OPTIONS The City could proceed with a broader annexation strategy for the area that could include the discussed property Or, the Council can decide to initiate the annexation process now for the subject property only, which would trigger zoning and subd~ws~on regulations If a plat apphcat~on ~s submitted prior to imtiat~on of annexation proceedings, only subd~viston regulations w~ll apply The submittal of a plat application does not preclude annexation, but lot stze would be vested RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that a broader annexation strategy should be perused, at a minimum annexation proceedings for the subject property should be m~tiated Utiht~es are accessible throughout the US 377 / 1-35W area, and the marketablhty and development pressure for the property (and others ~n the wcmity) continue to r~se significantly As development interest continues m the area, other properties may be platted before annexation can be tmt~ated tfa case-by-case strategy continues to be used ATTACHMENTS 1 Location Map 2 Utlht~es Map D~rector of Planning and Development NORTH ET./ LOCATION MAP Scale None NORTH Legend Water Lines by Diameter Sewer Lines by Diameter UTILITIES MAP Scale None AOenda item , oate AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE DEPARTMENT ACM August 8, 2000 Utahty Adrmmstratton Howard Martin, 349-8232 ~ SUBJECT: Consider Desxgn Options and Poantmg Alternatives for the 1 MG Elevated Storage Tank for the Upper Pressure Plane Elevated storage tanks are s~gnflicant financial investments for water utfltt~es and represent htgldy v~s~ble structures w~tlun a commumty due to thetr overall height and smze The last tune the Ctty of Denton constructed an elevated storage tank was m 1968 Ttus 2 nulhon gallon tank was named the Ittgh School Tank due to ~ts tn-color painting scheme that used the Denton I-Itgh School colors, purple and gold Prior to the construction ofthts tank, the C~ty of Denton had three other elevated tanks, two of wluch are still m service (the McKenna Park Tank and the Peach Street or Bell Ave Tank) The third tank was removed from serwce m the late 1960's and was located on Scripture Street near Calhoun Jumor I-hgh Prior to the construction of the new I-hgh School Tank these three tanks were painted wtth a standard salver color ex-tenor pmnt system with no lettering or logo ~denttfbang the Ctty of Denton Prior to the demgn of the I-hgh School Tank, the Ctty wanted to enhance the wsual appearance of the older elevated storage tanks and detemune a new painting scheme for the new tank to be built Ttus process included a commumty-sponsored contest held at the local schools to develop new painting schemes for each of the three storage tanks Each tank was to be painted m the school colors of the three major schools ~n the commumty, UNT, TWU and Denton I-hgh The elevated storage tank painting schemes that were ultimately selected and installed were a great source of pride for the commumty and made the storage tanks m Denton umque One of the drawbacks of these pmntmg schemes was the dark and bright colors tended to fade m the hot Texas sun and shorten the hfe of the exterior pmntmg system, at least from a visual aesthetxc appearance perspective The more elaborate mulU-color exterior painting system also costs about 25% more to install and maintain than convanuonal painting systems The City of Denton is experiencing significant growth and the Water Distribution System Master Plan as recommending the eonstru~on of five new elevated storage tanks over the next 20 years Three of these are planned to be constructed over the next five years The one nulhon gallon tank to be built at the intersection of I-35 and Loop 288 is urgently needed to provide pressure maantenance for the upper pressure plane and has been identified as a system deficiency m the past few inspections conducted by the TNRCC The tank site has been acqmred but prior to beglnreng the design of the tank, staffneeds direction from the City Council on two major items · What type of tank structure is acceptable to the commumty to bmld at tins Inghly wsible locataon7 · What type ofpmntmg scheme should be used for the exterior surfaces of the tank Elevated storage tank designs have evolved over the years to satisfy four major objectives 1 Fac~tate Econonncal Construction Methods 2 IVhmnuze Use of Materials and Overall Construction Costs 3 Prowde a Long Service Life winle Mtmnnzang O&M Costs 4 Prowde Acceptable Visual Aesthetics In the smaller tanks s~zes (less than 500,000 gallons) there are several tank design, fabrication and erecting compames available to purchase a tank from As the s~ze of these tanks gets greater, the number of finns capable to build them dmmushes to three firms, Pitt Des Momas (PDM), Cbaeagn Bndge and Iron (CBI), and Landmark Structures Until recently, PDM and CBI were the only two firms capable of budding elevated storage tanks an the one nulhon gallon capacity range and up These tanks were constructed of welded steel and included four basic designs 1 Standard Multiple Leg Supported Tank (Muht-Column or Toro-Elhpsoichal Leg Tank) 2 Combmatlon Fluted Coluran and Multiple Leg Supported Tank (Toropfllar) 3 Fluted Column Supported Tank (Hydropfllar or Fluted Pillar) 4 Steel Pedestal Supported Tanks (Pedestal Spheroid) About fifteen years ago, Landmark Structures of Fort Worth, Texas introduced a new tank design using a concrete column pedestal and a welded steel storage tank Tins new tank design was called a composite elevated storage tank Tins tank qmckly became widely accepted m the DFW area due to the combination of lower constructIon and maintenance costs and the generally pleasing wsual aesthetics The vast majority of the elevated storage tanks constructed m the DFW area over the past ten years have been the cempos~te storage tank design Due to the advantageous and vadespread acceptance of tins style of tank, PDM and CBI developed and marketed,their own versions of the composite tank design Exhibit II shows examples of the various tank designs prevtously described Tank painting systems have also evolved over the years and a properly installed quahty extenor pamUng system is expected to last from 15 to 20 years Due to sunhght's tendency to cause darker colors to absorb heat and prematurely fade, most tank fabricators and painting system applicators recommend using lighter colors for exterior coating systems for water storage tanks However, since many tank owners want to enhance the wsual appearance of the structure, many different tank-painting schemes have been used The economic mapacts of these alternative paint systems are two fold The maual costs for installing the more elaborate p~untmg system can be between 5% to as much as 300% more than a single color paint system · An,elaborate pamUng system will tend to lose it's desirable aesthetic qualities much sooner than a conventional single color pant system Due to these factors, the ma~onty of tank owners enhance the aestheUc quahUes of the tank painting systems through the use of culor banding, and owner identifying loges and lettering These are common owner preferences for tank pamtmg projects and most pmnt system contracturs are farmhar with and capable of mstalhng these systems Examples of various painting systems that have been used for elevated storage tank projects are also included m Exlublt II A comparison of the relative costs for each of the four styles of tank designs and the varying levels of tank painting schemes are included in Exlublt III OPTIONS: Five basic structural designs for elevated storage tanks are available to consider for flus s~ze tank These are ,hsted m order of ascending cost to construct 1 Standard Multiple Leg Supported Tank (Mul~t-Column or Toro-Elbpsoidlal Leg Tank) 2 Composite Concrete Column - Steel Bowl Tank 3 Fluted Column Supported Tank (Hydropdlar or Fluted Pillar) 4 Combmatmn Fluted Column and MulUple Leg Supported Tank (Toropfllar) 5 Steel Pedestal Supported Tanks (Pedestal Spheroid) There are four different painting schemes that are available to consider for elevated storage tanks These are hsted m order of ascending cost to install and maintain 1 Basic One Color Scheme 2 Lcttarmg and Banding 3 Lettering and Loges wth Banding 4 Multi-Color Geometric or Mural Art RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the design of a compome concrete colunm steel tank as the preferred structural design for tlms project It provides the best combmaUon of econormcs, aesthetics and low O&M costs and provides the largest number of potenual quahfied btddars Staff also recommends using the letterm8 and loges wath banding patntmg system as a desirable option to consider for the following reasons It provides an attractive appearance that prowdes name recogmUon for the City of Denton at a major transportation entryway on Interstate 35 It provides an edvemsmg opportumty to d~splay the new City of Denton Logo It will provide a way to standardize the appearance of the new City of Denton water storage tanks to be built m the future It will proxade an attractive tank appearance at a lower cost to install and m0antam than the current p0antmg systems used on other elevated storage tanks m Denton PRIOR ACTION REVIEW (COUNt, BOARDS, COMMISSION) PUB September 20, 1999 - Receive a briefing from staff recommenihng the anqmsmon of the proposed tank s~te January 19, 2000 - Recommend purchase of 1 7 acre tank me January 24, 2000 - Professmnal Engineering Servmes contract with Slumek, Jacobs & Flnldea presented for eons~deraUon March 6, 2000 - Profasstonal Engmeenng Servmes contract with Stumek, lacobs & Fmklea approved ~Iuly 17, 2000- Received a presentaUon from staff on elevated storage tank options The PUB endorsed staff's reeommendataons 4-0 C~ty Council February 8, 2000 - Receive a briefing from staffrecommendmg the acqmsition of the proposed tank site March 21, 2000 - Approval of the purchase of 1 7 acre tank site ESTIMATED SCI~EDULE OF PROJECT: The tank should be operational by the late summer of 2002 The current schedule for the project ts detailed in Exhibit IV FISCAL INFORMATION: The project budget estabhshed for the destgn and construction of the elevated storage tank is $1,140,000 The FY 2000 CIP ProJect Summary Sheet for ttus project is mcluded as Exhibit V To date, the follovong expenses have been incurred on the project Site Selection Study $ 14,000 Geotechmcal $ 3,500 Land Purchase $ 74,840 Survey and Platting $ 20,000 Tank Engnneenng Design $ 33,600 Waterline Design $ 22,000 (for upper and maddle pressure plane tank sites) Total $167,940 SeeErdub~ I Respectfully submitted Howard Martin ~ Assistant City Manager, Utilities Prepared by Ttmothy S Fisher, P E Assistant Director of Water UtthUes Exhibit I Exhibit II Exhibit m Exhtblt IV Exhibit V -Locatton Map - Examples of Various Elevated Storage Tank Designs and Painting Systems - Summary of Econonuc Factors Related to Various Design Options - ProJect Schedule - Capital Improvements ProJect Summary Sheet LOOATION MAP N EXHIBIT I Exhibit II Examples of Various Elevated Storage Tank Designs and Painting Systems. Exhibit III Summary of Economic Factors Related to Various Design Options Tank Structural Design Cost Ratio of Costs Standard Muluple Leg Supported Tank Composite Concrete Colunm - Steel Bowl Fluted Column Supported Tank Combmatmn Fluted Column and Multiple Leg Steel Pedestal Supported Tanks $ 950,000 0 79 $ 1,200,000 1 00 $ 1,300,000 1 08 $ 1,500,000 1 25 $ 1,500,000 1 25 * using a composite tank as the baseline cost Tank Structural Design Standard Multiple Leg Supported Tank Composite Concrete Column - Steel Bowl Fluted Column Supported Tank CombinatIon Fluted Column and Multiple Leg Steel Pedestal Supported Tanks Potential Bidders CBI / PDM / Caldwell / Phoemx Landmark / CBI / PDM CBI / PDM CBI / PDM CBI / PDM Paint System Opttons Description Bas~c One Color Scheme Lettenng and Banding Lettering and Logos with Banding MulU-Color Geometric or Mural Art Imtlal Cost * O&M $ 70,000 Same as Basle $ 75,000 Same as Baste $ 95,000 Same as Basic $125,000 ~ Reduction m Sevace Life Up to 30% Ex'tenor paint system for a 1 0 MG composite tank Assumes a m-color geometric design 2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 00~0460K10 I PROJ TITLE (G) IMG ELEVATED STORAGE FOR UPPER PLANE ESTIMATED COST $1,140 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION This prelect would provide for a I-MG elevated storage tank to be located in the upper pressure plane on the northwest side of Denton PURPOSE To provide more uniform pressures In the northwest portions of the syetem and to maximize high-service pumping efficiencies To satisfy peak hourly demand, the TNRCC storage capacity requirements and the State Board of Insurance fire demand requirements ENCUMBRANCES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND TOTAL IST YR S890 TOTAL 2ND YR S0 TOTAL 3RD YR S0 GRAND TOTAL $890 SO S0 50 S890 S890 SO $0 S0 S0 $0 SO S0 $0 S0 S0 S0 S0 $0 $890 S890 ENCUMBRANCE DATES Encumbered as spent PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT # Land Purchase 10/98 S 140 9002 Survey 10/98 $ 10 8563 Engineering Design 10/98 S 100 8550 inspection 10/99 S 40 8552 Constructmn (Tank) 10/99 S 850 9101 CASH EXPENDITURES RE~ ~IC OTHER TOTAL SO S0 $0 S800 S0 S0 S0 S0 $0 S0 $0 $0 S0 SO S0 $890 ENCUMBRANCE TOTAL COMMENTS S1,140 This is a multi-year project starting m 1999 Encumbrances Prtor to 2000 Current CIP TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET 250,000 890.000 S 1,140,000 I!NO AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Agenda Item Date ~/~/~0 AGENDA DATE August 8, 2000 DEPARTMENT ACM Parks end Ret~Tn Dave Hill .~ SUBJECT: Receive a report, hold a drscusslon and gqve staff d~rect~on regarding the construction of streetscape nnprovements around the Courthouse Square BACKGROUND: The 1996-1999 CIP mcluded $700,000 for the design and construction of "streetscape" improvements around the Courthouse Square and along Hickory Street to Bell Avenue The objectives of the project are 1) to unprove the appearance oftbe area, 2) to provide for a safer, more pedestrian-friendly environment, 3) to prowde for bicycle traffic linkages, 4) to nnprove the orgamTaUon of velucular traffic and parking, including handrcap spaces, 5) to correct poor dram_age Each of these objecttves is to be accoml~hshed wathout a loss of parking spaces and with mmnnal negative effect on area merchants during the construction phase The ortgmal wmon for flus project included the streets around the Courthouse end the sectzon of Hickory Street that runs from Bell Avenue to the Square (the "arts comdor') Due to funding constraints, plans have been prepared only for the work immedrately around, the Square Future funding voll be reqmred to accomplish improvements on the streets one block off of the Square (Cedar, Austin, Pecan end Walnut) and the arts comdQr The designed project scope mcludas sidewalk replacement, new bnckwork crosswi~lks, landscaping, site furmture, and signage mmllar to that already m place at the comer of Elm and Hickory (Exlubit A) Full-scale drawings wall be presented at the August 8ta meeting Throughout the planning and design phase, staff and the project consultants work closely wath representatives of Vision for Denton, Mare Street Association end other downtown merchants Numerous meetings have been held to develop the design concept, make decis]ous regarding traffic end parking patterns, end test the consultant's soluuous against the needs of the businesses and residents around the Square Plans and construction document have been completed for tins proJect, and staff is preparing to advemse for bids Recently, a meeting was held with members of the Mere Street Associanon to rewew the latest set of plens end to chscuss the construction schedule Those m attendance expressed support for the current design. However, the group requested that the C~ty not unigate major ~onstructton until after January 2001, In order to avoid chsrupt~on of business dunngl the busmst shopping period of the year In order to advance the project and mnumlzed the escalation of construction of construction prices over t~me, staff 1s presently exploring the posslbihty of lettmg a consffuction contract prior the end of 2000 to implement some project elements that would not slgrnficanfly chsrupt business activity We voll pursue this option only after the merchants are satisfied that their interests have been protected OPTIONS: 1. D~rect staff to proceed w~th the project, as recommended 2. D~rect staff to address any further Issues and concerns identified by Council Members, and revisit tins project at a future work session RECOMMENDATION: Should the Clty Council support the project as designed, the staff recommends that the construction bids be sought as soon as practical, dependent upon agreement with the merchants regarding elements that could be constructed vath mmunal disruption to busmess during the hohday shopping season ESTIMATE SCHEDULE OF PROJECT: A construction contract should be awarded no later than December 2000, w~th construction being completed by November 2001 Should the merchants agree, a construction contract could be awarded pnor to December, allowing work to proceed on certain elements of the project PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW: This is the City Council's first review of the final design There have been numerous presentations to the Vision Cabmet, m which several Council Members have been revolved FISCAL INFORMATION: $700,000 m 1998 CIP funds Exm~ITS: 1 Exlublt A--proJect site plan Respectfully submitted Ed Hodney ~ Director of Parks and Recreation F k~gimm\Cliy Councfl~AGENT)A INFORMATION SHEET Downtown lmprovments doc 2 RuG 02 O0 05 04p Gonzalez & S~hneebePG EnG 214-891-1437 p.~ EXHIBIT ,~OZ~AS~IS ~ S~NIgN3 9kF:Ig33NH3S ~ Z~IYZN09 O00B G~' §0 ZT 80 §ny pm~ §~P 3EIVf109 ~4]N\NO,LN:~O\:12aCOdd\PaaeqS\ 3 3 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Agend= No,~ Agendaltem ~'-~ ' -~ Date_ ~//~/P/2 .... AGENDA DATE August 8, 2000 DEPARTMENT ACM Parks and Recr~o~ Dave Hdl ~)~ Sta~CT: Receive a r~o~, hold a ~s~on ~d ~ve s~f ~ec~on reg~g ~e Denton En~ce Munm~t project BACKGROUND: The 1996-1999 ClP included a total of $250,000 for the design and construOaon of "entrar~ce monuments" at five lecatmns along the SH 380 and Interstate 35 The project was first conceived during the Vision for Denton meetings and was incorporated into the CIP A site on I-hllwood Corporatmn land along 1-35 W, south of the 2449 exit, was selected as the first monument site Exhibit A shows the design of the monument Full- scale drawings wall be presented at the August 8th meeting The proJect was first designed and adverUsed for bid m spring 1998 Only one bid was received, exceeding the project by nearly 300 % The decision was made to redesign and re-bid the project As the design continued, issues surfaced related to the use of the Hdlwood Corporation's land for the project, further slowing progress on the project The land issues have been resolved, and bids have been received on a redesigned project Three bids were received, ranging from $147,000 to $269,000 Staff ms rewewmg the bids at this t~me, and prepared to recommend a contract to the Council m August Prior to placing the award of a construction on an agenda for your considerat~on, staff would hke the City Council's consent to proceed Current funding for the project wall allow us to bmld only one monument Other monuments wall reqmre additional public and/or,private resources We intend to advance the construction of this project, unless &rected othervase It is possible that, once m place, tlus monument may inspire the funding and construction of one or more of the remaunng monuments Should the Council wash to terminate the project, funds could be reallocated to other efforts, including (but not limited to) the installation of new directional and site mgnage for City facthUes and major destinations in Denton OPTIONS: 1 Direct staff to proceed wath the project, as recommended 2 D~rect staff to address any further issues and concerns identified by Council Members, and rewslt tbas project at a future work session 3 D~rect staff to tei-i~anate the project and propose a reallocation of the remmnmg RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that flus project proceed ESTIMATE SCHEDULE OF PROJECT: A constru~on contract should be awarded m August, allovang construction to be completed vathm 90 to 120 days of a contract PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW: Tlus lsl the City Council's first review There have been numerous presentations to the Vision Cabinet, in wluch several Council Members have been revolved FISCAL INFORMATION: $250,000 m 1996-1999 CIP funds EXHIBITS: 1 Exh~btt A--des~gn concept Respectfully submitted Ed Hodney ~ D~rector of Parks and Recreation F ~mm\Cgy CounclI~A. GENDA INFORMATION SHEET Downtown Improvments doc 2 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: August 8,2000 DEPARTMENT: ACM: David Hill, 349-8314 SUBJECT Receive a Report, Hold a D~scusslon, and Make a Recommendation for proposed median mod~ficatmns on Colorado Boulevard m front of Target near the Loop 288 IntersecUon BACKGROUND Target remodeled their store located at Colorado Boulevard and Loop 288 last year to the larger Super Store model They contacted the city through a consultant, Innovative Transportation Solutions, to look at nnprovements that could be constructed on Colorado Boulevard to improve traffic capacity and safety The Denton Police Department has also expressed great concern and has documented 14 accidents that occurred along tbs segment of Colorado last year The final proposal prowdes for enclosed left mrn bays at the erasting median opemng and creates a full medmn opening to the northwest on Colorado in front of the Hastings complex Plans of that proposal are attached, whch is also supported by the Golden Triangle Mall Under current regulations, the emstmg medmn opemng would have been reqmred to be placed back where the new proposed me&an opening ~s All property owners are in agreement, including the Golden Triangle Mall, except for the Arby's owner (SABRA), who have not responded to many requests to meet Staffmterprets Arby's response to be opposition to the proposal Arby's has already been g~ven a variance for a specml individual access point (right turn m only) from Colorado very close (w~thn 100 feet) to the Loop 288 intersection Arby's customers currently use the emstmg Target median opening to turn left or right omo Colorado~ If the proposed alterations are made, the mechan opening m front of Target wdl be closed to ,lefr tums out, allovang right out turns only The new me&an opening in front of Hastings w~H then provide oppormmties for both left and right-hand turns onto Colorado, whch is a much safer distance from the Loop 288 intersection I'Q Ill. Approval 2 Disapproval RECOMMENDATION Staff rec6mmends approval of the proposed Colorado median alterations The spacing of the median opemng from Loop 288 is an important factor m lmprowng motorist safety m tbs area PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW Not Aphcable FISCAL INFORMATION The proposed project is a 50/50 partnerslup between Target and the oty Target has offered to pay for materials, amounting to nearly to $40,000 The Street Dlwsion is prepared to handle project adnumstrataon and construction, prowding for all removals, grading, backfill, and ~nstallation, winch have a value of almost $40,000 ATTACHMENTS Project Map Respectfully subnatted Je~-ry 91~k, D~rector En~ti~eenng 8~ TransportaUon AGENDA DATE: DEPARTMENT: CM' AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET August 8, 2000 City Manager's Office Mike Jez SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a thscuss]on and give staff direction regarding a paperless agenda BACKGROUND Council Member Durrance asked that th~s item be placed on the Work Session for an update on where the City was m th~s process Due to the length of the Work Session on May 23, 2000, the ~tem was postponed to the June 13, 2000 meeting At the June 13th meeting, Council dec~ded to resehedule the ~tem to the June 27th Council meetmg when there would be a full Council Council received the report on June 27th but as there again was not a full Council, the ~tem was held until the August 8th Work Session In March, a committee was formed to study the agenda process and determine the best way to proceed wlth a paperless agenda The goal statement designed by the Committee ~s to "develop an efficient and affordable agenda process, to prowde d~g~tal mformat~on w~thout extending submission deadhnes or adding addltmnal work for the orgamzat~on" The Committee dec~ded that the City Secretary and a representative from Technology Services would interview the major contributors of the agenda to develop an overall work flow chart That chart would be used to evaluate the current agenda process and to assist ~n formulating the best method to mass-produce a paperless agenda All of the s~x major contributors have been interviewed and a master flow chart ~s being prepared on the agenda process ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT It lS estimated that ~t will take two to three weeks to complete the charting of the agenda process The committee will then evaluate the work flow chart to determine a process to begin a paperless agenda That process, once dec~ded, will have to be tested over a number of weeks to ensure that a quahty product was being sent out to Council The estimated completion date of the project ~s the start of the new fiscal year RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that Council make a determination on whether or not ~t desires to have a paperless agenda rather than a paper agenda It ~s felt that if the majority of the Council dec~des that a paperless agenda is preferred, only one type of agenda be produced rather than a combination of paper and paperless agendas m order to meet the goal statement's objective of not adchng add~tlunal work for the organization Respectfully submitted ~ltyifer ~alters Secretary AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDADATE. DEPARTMENT: CM~CM/ACM: August 8, 2000 Planning & Developme~ Dave Hill, 349-8314 SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding cltywlde plarmmg activities BACKGROUND In summer 1997, the Clty Council identified several planning objectives to accomplished by staff, including projects such as the sign ordinance amendments, a park dedmatlon ordinance, landscape ordinance amendments, establishment of xmpact fees, and development of the Denton Plan All of the assigned projects have been completed or will be incorporated in the Development Code Rewrite project A timetable was developed to keep City Cotmcfl and the pubhc informed as to the status of individual projects Upon adoption of the Denton Plan and the anticipated completion of the Development Code Rewrite by the end of 2000, staff has identified several planning projects intended to respond proactlvely to policy dlrectlvas contmned in the Denton Plan Other proJects have been identified that require direction from Council regardmg project implementation To enable Council discussion and dlrectaon regarding future planning activities, the attached draft Planning Actlvltlas Timetable has been prepared Activities that have not been approved or funded have not been assigned subtasks or estimated completion dates, pending Council direction A Fac]ht]es Master Plan is considered essant]al to address service quahty and efficiency issues, and has been included in the proposed 2000-01 budget Four other planning projects considered to be high priorities bY lstaff include 1 OPen Space Master Plan, as discussed by City Council during the June 26, 2000 work session, 2 CBD Redevelopment Plan, intended to prepare an improvement strategy for the downtown areas extending several blocks from the Square and Incorporating other objectives such as the Civic Center Park Master Plan, and connectivity to the universities, 3 Annexation Plan, intended to develop appropriate pohcles for annexation decision- making, including proximity to existing utilities, mterlocal agreement needs, acknowledgement of estabhshed utility service areas (CCN's), and coordination with Denton Plan future land use objectives, 4 Roadway Capacity Analysis, intended to develop a transportation model for the entire city, based on exxstmg land uses and zoning as established by the Development Code Rewrite, m order to revise the adopted Mob]hty Plan as necessary to ensure long-term local roadway plannmg is coordinated with land use objectives For the purposes of the August 8th work session, staff is interested ~n Council's thoughts regarding the items listed,, additional projects that should be considered, project priorities, and general comments regarding the future direction of continued planning for the community The extent to winch specific projects are funded during fiscal year 2000-01 will depend upon Council's preferences OPTIONS Several options are avmlable to Council More information regarding the scope of specific projects may be needed, or follow-up discussion may be desired before decisions are made Activities may be revised, deleted or added to the project list RECOMMENDATION The outcome of Council's discussions should be the development of a work program for staff regarding the projects that should be pursued, in the order of their priority, and expectations for completion Staff will then be able to use the timetable to update Council regarding project progress at regular intervals ESTIMATED PROJECT SCHEDULE The emphasis for staff at this time Is to develop a strategy to address Council planning priorities for the upcoming fiscal year (2000-01) PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW This is the first discussion scheduled for this topic FISCAL INFORMATION Planning projects selected by Council to begin in Fall 2000 will be funded in the 2000-01 budget ATTACHMENTS Draft Planning Activities Timetable Respectful~ltt~ ~Clty Manage~r, Development Services Da~Hfll ~ CITY OF DENTON PLANNING ACTIVITIES & TIMETABLE last revised August 4, 2000 2000 2001 2002 PLANNING ACTMTY ~ g ~ ~ ~> ,?, = ,,=,.~ ~ ~ ~ >; o ~u~' o~- z~ ~ = m= <'" =."' SIGN ORDINANCE ABEN_nNENTS PARK DEDICATION ORDINANCE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS ~. ~ Mo,.~,u~ .o~w^Y C _nN__PREHENSIVE PLAN MOBlUTY PLAN TRANSIT cn~PONENT LIBRARY MASTER PLAN PARKS & REC MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT ¢ODF- REWRITE I I Complehon of Dm~t Code Comm~ee ~ev~ew Public Rewew j __ P&Z Rewew andRecommendahon ~ Council Review & Ado ~on.~ I LEVEL OF SERVICE I TRAFFIC IMPACT A~$E~$MENT POL!C!E$ C~ty Council Work Session · MOBILITY PLAN PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE LINKAGE COMPONENT Pubhc Rewew (ongoing) Parks & Recreahon Board Approval · Planning & Zoning Comm Recomm ·: C~ty Council Approval · 2000 2001 2002 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY I JUN I JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR LAKE RAY ROBERTS MASTER PLAN Analys,s of Exlsling tnformat]on illi Prehmma~ Staff RecommendatJons __ __ Public involvement Draft Findings & Recommendations Final Pres~,~,~,o,,s to Dallas / Denton Ran Adopt]on DOWNTOWN SQUARE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN C~ Council Work Session · CELL TOWER ORDINANCE Planing & Zoning Comm Recomm · City Council Approval · WATER I WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN Pubhc Ubht]es Board Rewew · C~ Couml Work Session · IMPACT FEE AMENDMENTS MF & GOV'T FACILITIES POLICIES City Counc~t Work Sesston · Council Adoption of Amendments ~ IMPACT FEE AMENDMENTS W/WW ~ LINE FEES & BIFFERENTIAL RATES ::3 C~ty Councd Work Sessm ~. RFQ / Consultant Sel~ c3 C~ty Council Contract Approval .~ Fee Estabhshment Process _~ P&Z / PUB / CC Ordmnce Adopt]on ~ CIVIC CENTER PARK MASTER PLAN ~ ~ lmplsmantat]on Strat~[tY I I Z0 GREENBELT MASTER PLAN Annexat]on Petition I I I 2000 2001 2002 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEM MAR APR ANNEXATION PLAN Develop Dra~ Scope of Work RFQ / Consultant Select]on C~ty Council Contract Approval OPEN SPACE BASTER PLAN Develop Draft Scope of Work RFQ / Consultant Seledaon Cr~ Council Contract Approval ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS Develop Draft Scope of Work RFQ / Consultant Selec~on C~ty Council Contract Approval INTERACTIVE DEVELOPBENT CODE Develop Draft .~-n~ of Work RFQ / Consultant Select]on C[~ Council Contract A~proval SMALL AREA PLANS Fry Street SAP tmplementat]on Fry Slmet PID / ClP Improvements Centralized Sehd Waste Revetments SE Denton Neighborhood SAP Downtown District Plan CBD Redevelopment Plan Dema Na9hbo[hood SAP Indu~a,l Area SAP Sherman Multi-Use S~te DISD/Cit~ SAP FACILITIES BASTER PLAN Develop Draft Scope of Work RFQ / Consultant Select]on C~ty Council Contract Approval ~ERVICE CENTER BASTER PLAN I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I · Indicates scheduled meeting or complet]on dates AGENDA DATE: DEPARTMENT CM AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET August 8, 2000 Clty Manager's Office Mike Jez Agenda Item mate SUBJECT Consider nominations/appointments to the City's Boards and Commissions BACKGROUND Each City Council Member is responsible for making nominations for board and commission places assigned to him or her Individual City Council Members will make nommatlons to the full City Council for the Council's approval or d~sapproval at the next regular scheduled meeting Council Members malang nommatlons for members to the boards and commissions will consider interested persons on a eltywlde basis The City Council wall make an effort to be inclusive of all segments of the community m the board and commission appointment process City Council Members will consider ethmclty, gender, soclo-econom~e levels, and other factors to ensure a diverse representation of Denton citizens The City Council will take into consideration an md~vldual's qualifications, wflhngness to serve, and apphcatlon reformation m selecting nominations for membership to each board and commission In an effort to ensure maximum citizen participation, C~ty Council Members will continue the general practice of nommatmg new citizens to replace board members who have served three consecutive, full terms on the same board PRIOR ACTION Council members made nominations to the various boards/commissions at its meeting of August 1st and approved those nominations at that meeting A hst of the vacancies still existing is attached BOARDS/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS AilIPO RT ADVISORY BOARD [ ~st Current Member Nomination Term Council 7 Terry Garland Terry Garland 1998-00 Brock A )roved 6/27 4 Joe Roy Joe Roy 1998-00 Knstoferson Approved 6/27 5 Ronald Keaton Ronald Keaton 1998-00 Beasley Approved 6/27 D~st Current Member Nommatlon Term Council 5 L~sa Zottarelll L~sa Zottarelh 1998-00 Beasley Apnroved 6/27 6 Harnet Aronson Hamet Aronson 1998-00 Burroughs Aonroved 7/25 ) OF ADJUSTMENT D~st Current Member Nom~naUon Term Council 5 Bob Manning Bob Manmng 1998-00 Beasley Approved 6/27 2 Robyn Mullendore Robyn Mullendore 1998-00 Durrance Aooroved 6/27 COMI~ iUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVI~LIKY t_:OlVllVl! 1 D~st Current Member Nomlnat~on Term Council 5 L~sa Hmojosa Mary Ahce Moreno 1998-00 Beasley An~roved 8/1 6 Barbara Stmnett Barbara Stmnett 1998-00 Burroughs Approved 6/27 7 Jean Ellen Rogers Jorge Urbma 1998-00 Brock Aooroved 7/25 3 Sondra Ferstl Sondra Ferstl 1998-00 Cochran Approved 6/27 5 Ann Hatch Edward Tourmne 1998-00 Beasley Approved 7/25 CONS RUCTION ADVISO ~Y & APPEALS BOARD D~st Speciality Current Member Nommatmn Term Council '2 Assoemted w~th Henry Rafe Henry Rafe 1999-00 Durrance construction, Approved 6/27 development or real estate 4 Arctutect or Alan Nelson Alan Nelson 1999-00 Knstoferson Engineer Approved 6/27 )N HOUSING AUTHORITY Seat Current Member Nomination Term 7 Ray Bejarano Ray Bej arano 1998-00 Brock Approved 6/27 7 Bob Crouch Bill Glese 1998-00 Brock Approved 7/25 RIC LANDMARK COI~ [MISSION I)~st Current Member Nomination Term Council 3 Mark Sandel Mark Sandel 1998-00 Cochran Ant>roved 6/27 7 Peggy Norton Peggy Norton 1998-00 Brock Approved 6/27 2 Jun I{arkpamck Rod Reeves 1998-00 Durrance Aooroved 7/25 Dlst C~ent Memb~ Nommaaon T~ Co.cfi 6 Ten ~eault Ten ~eault 1998-00 B~ou~s Approved 7/25 7 C~ol B~tley C~ol Br~tley 1998-00 Brock Aooroved 7/25 4 Wallace Dural Wallace Duv~l 1998-00 ~stoferson Approv~ 6/27 LIBIU RY BOARD D~st Current Member Nomination Term Council 7 Teresa Starrett Teresa Starrett 1998-00 Brock Approved 6/27 3 Eva Cadwallader Eva Cadwallader 1998-00 Cochran Approved 6/~7 PARK1 ~ AND RECREATION BOARD Dlst Current Member Nomination Term Council 3 Dale Yeatts Dale Yeatts 1998-00 Cochran Approved 6/27 2 Brandon Barnes Brandon Barnes 1998-00 Durrance Approved 7/25 4 Brenda Plulhps Brenda Phillips 1998-00 Knstoferson Approved 6/27 HNG AND ZONING COMMISSION D~st Current Member Nomination Term Council 3 Salty Rlshel Salty Rlshel 1998-00 Cochran Approved 7/25 5 J~m Engelbreeht Vmkl Holt 1998-00 Beasley Aooroved 7/25 6 Perry McNelll Perry McNefll 1998-00 Burroughs Approved 7/25 BOARD Nominat~on Term Council 4PA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Seat Current Member Nomination Term 0 George Hopkdns George Hopkins 1998-00 ALL Approved 6/27 Dlst Current Member Nomination Term Council 6 Greg Sawko Greg Sawko 1998-00 Burroughs Approved 6/27 1 Fred Hill Fred Hill 1998-00 Young Am~roved 7/25 2 Barry Walters Barry Walters 1998-00 Durrance Approved 6/27 3 Sflwa Lesko Sflvla Lesko 1998-00 Cochran Approved 6/27 4