Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 8, 2008 Agenda $*(1'$ &,7<2)'(1721&,7<&281&,/ -DQXDU\ $IWHUGHWHUPLQLQJWKDWDTXRUXPLVSUHVHQWWKH&LW\&RXQFLORIWKH&LW\RI'HQWRQ7H[DVZLOO FRQYHQHLQD:RUN6HVVLRQRQ7XHVGD\-DQXDU\DWSPLQWKH&RXQFLO:RUN 6HVVLRQ5RRPDW&LW\+DOO(0F.LQQH\6WUHHW'HQWRQ7H[DVDWZKLFKWKHIROORZLQJLWHPV ZLOOEHFRQVLGHUHG 5HTXHVWVIRUFODULILFDWLRQRIDJHQGDLWHPVOLVWHGRQWKHDJHQGDIRU-DQXDU\ 5HFHLYHDUHSRUWKROGDGLVFXVVLRQDQGJLYHVWDIIGLUHFWLRQUHJDUGLQJSURMHFWVWREH LQFOXGHGLQ'HQWRQ¶V)<&RQJUHVVLRQDO3ULRULW\3URMHFWUHTXHVWV 5HFHLYHDUHSRUWKROGDGLVFXVVLRQDQGJLYHVWDIIGLUHFWLRQUHJDUGLQJWKHUH]RQLQJRI DSSUR[LPDWHO\DFUHVRIODQGIURPWKHLQLWLDO]RQLQJRID5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO 5'  ]RQLQJGLVWULFWWRWKH&ROH5DQFK0DVWHU3ODQQHG&RPPXQLW\ &ROH5DQFK03&  ]RQLQJGLVWULFW7KHSURSHUW\LVJHQHUDOO\ORFDWHGZHVWRI,QWHUVWDWH:HVWVRXWKRI 7RP&ROH5RDG 03& City of Denton City Council Agenda January 8, 2008 Page 2 ANY FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE ON A MATTER DELIBERATED IN A CLOSED MEETING WILL ONLY BE TAKEN IN AN OPEN MEETING THAT IS HELD IN COMPLIANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 551, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT SUCH FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE IS TAKEN IN THE CLOSED MEETING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF §551.086 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE (THE `PUBLIC POWER EXCEPTION'). THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO A CLOSED MEETING OR EXECUTIVE SESSION AS AUTHORIZED BY TEX. GOVT. CODE, §551.001, ET SE . (THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT) ON ANY ITEM ON ITS OPEN MEETING AGENDA OR TO RECONVENE IN A CONTINUATION OF THE CLOSED MEETING ON THE CLOSED MEETING ITEMS NOTED ABOVE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION §551.071-551.086 OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. U.S. Flag B. Texas Flag "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible." 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamations/Awards 3. CONSENT AGENDA Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. The City Council has received background information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration. Citizens may speak on items listed on the Consent Agenda. A Request to Speak Card should be completed and returned to the City Secretary before Council considers the Consent Agenda. Citizen comments on Consent Agenda items are limited to three minutes. Listed below are bids, purchase orders, contracts, and other items to be approved under the Consent Agenda (Agenda Items A - R). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. If no items are pulled, Consent Agenda Items A - R below will be approved with one motion. If items are pulled for separate discussion, they may be considered as the first items following approval of the Consent Agenda. A. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Ambulance Service Agreement between the City of Denton and Denton County for ambulance services; and declaring an effective date. City of Denton City Council Agenda January 8, 2008 Page 3 B. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Fire Protection Agreement between the City of Denton and Denton County for fire protection services; and declaring an effective date. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and the Denton Chamber of Commerce; and providing an effective date. The Economic Development Partnership Board recommends approval (7-0). D. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and Opening Doors Immigration Services for provision of assistance to victims of domestic violence; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing for an effective date. ($500) E. Consider approval of tax refunds for the following property taxes: Name Reason Tax Year Amount 1. Evers Parks Ltd/Keybank Real Estate DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 6,814.71 2. First American/Nationstarhortgage 2006 Overpayment 2006 $1,488.56 3. Ezell Air, Inc DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 861.51 4. GCBSXX, LLC DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 829.90 5. Ezell Air, Inc DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 722.39 F. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a Water Main Cost Participation Agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and Robson Denton Development L. P. for the City's participation in the oversizing of water mains and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ordinance; authorizing the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date. (In the not-to-exceed amount of $247,308.26). The Public Utilities Board recommends approval (6-0). G. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to that certain Tax Abatement Agreement with Aldi (Texas) L.L.C. approved by the City Council on August 21, 2007, by providing that, as a condition of the Abatement, Aldi shall construct a certain portion of VVescourt Road so specifications acceptable to the City of Denton and further providing that the construction of Wescourt Road shall be completed and accepted by the City of Denton prior to the issuance of tax abatement by the City of Denton; providing for a severability clause; and providing an effective date. The Economic Development Partnership Board recommends approval (7-0). H. Consider approval of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas authorizing the filing of a proj ect application with the North Central Texas Council of Governments for a Regional Solid Waste Program -Local Implementation Project; delegating and authorizing George C. Campbell, City Manager, or his designate, to act on behalf of the city in all other matters that are related to this project application, pledging that if funding for this project is received, the City of Denton, Texas will comply with all project requirements of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and the State of Texas, and providing for an effective date. City of Denton City Council Agenda January 8, 2008 Page 4 I. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Ordinance 2007-260 so as to award a one-time purchase for overhead mounted and underground pad distribution transformers for Denton Municipal Electric; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3886-One-Time Purchase for Overhead and Underground Distribution Transformers awarded to Wesco Distribution in the amount of $770,846, and to Techline, Inc. in the amount of $98,676 for a total award amount of $869,522). J. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order One to the contract between the City of Denton and The Fain Group, Inc.; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3770-Cedar Street Improvements Change Order One in the amount of $197,744.64). K. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a purchase order through the Lower Colorado River Authority for the acquisition of 69kV and 13 8kV circuit breakers for Denton Municipal Electric by way of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Denton; and providing an effective date (File 3623-Interlocal Agreement for the Purchase of Circuit Breakers for Denton Municipal Electric awarded to Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution in the amount of $347,390). The Public Utilities Board recommends approval (6-0). L. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids by way of an Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County and awarding a contract for the purchase of nine police sedans; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (File 3946-Interlocal Agreement for Police Sedans with Tarrant County, contract awarded to Philpott Ford Inc. in the amount of $205,884). M. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a public works contract for the construction of Shady Oaks and Brinker Paving and Drainage Improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3897-Shady Oaks and Brinker Paving and Drainage Improvements awarded to JRJ Paving, L.P. in the amount of $2,884,059.98). N. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (ICA) in the amount of $3,304,057.98 between the City of Denton and Denton County for the construction of Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Denton; and declaring an effective date. 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a public works contract for the construction of Western Boulevard Drainage Phase I; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3929-Western Boulevard Drainage Phase I awarded to Ed Bell Construction in the amount of $4,699,337.85). City of Denton City Council Agenda January 8, 2008 Page 5 P. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with the firm of Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. to provide architectural design services for the City of Denton Senior Center; authorizing the expenditure of funds therefor, and providing an effective date (File 3943 in an amount not to exceed $145,000). Q. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a two year contract for mowing for various City departments; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3926-Two Year Contract for Mowing awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, for each section, in the annual estimated amount of $373,316). R. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a grant application from Elk River Investments from the Downtown Incentive Grant Program not to exceed $10,000; and providing for an effective date. The Economic Development Partnership Board recommends approval (7-0). 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance regarding the initial zoning of an approximately 0.12-acre tract of land from a Rural Residential 5 (RD-5) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district and the rezoning of an approximately 1.39-acre tract of land from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use zoning district. The property is located on the north side of Teasley Lane and northwest of Old Alton Road, directly south of John H. Guyer High School. (Z07-0024, Wild 1Vlustang Crossing) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends (5-0). B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance regarding amendments to the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District encompassing approximately 410 acres of land located generally on both sides of U.S. Highway 380 (West University Drive), between Interstate Highway 35 and Bonnie Brae Street; providing for a zoning change from Neighborhood Residential 6 (NR-6) and Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning districts to base zoning districts of Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) for part of the site south of U. S. 3 80 as well as amending of the development standards for the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and establishing development standards (including but not limited to permitting single family detached, single family attached, multifamily and office uses) applicable to a portion of the subject property which lies south of U. S. Hwy 3 80; and amending Chapter 35, Subchapter 7 of the city of Denton Code of Ordinances, "Denton Development Code", "Special Purpose and Overlay Districts" to amend section 3 5.7.13 "Rayzor Ranch Overlay District". (Z06-0029 and Z06-0030, Rayzor Ranch) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (6-0). City of Denton City Council Agenda January 8, 2008 Page 6 C. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending Subchapter 16 of the Denton Development Code concerning recording of plats, construction of public improvements and building permits. (DCA06-0017, Subchapter 16) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (6-0). 5. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION A. Consider nominations/appointments to the City's Boards and Commissions. B. Citizen Reports 1. Review of procedures for addressing the City Council. 2. Receive citizen reports from the following: a. Nell Yeldell regarding update on mistakes made by city, county and state. C. New Business and Announcements This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas, request information from the City Manager, and/or make announcements of public interest. D. City Manager's Report E. Possible Continuation of Closed Meeting under Sections 551.071-551.086 of the Texas Open Meetings Act. F. Official Action on Closed Meeting Item(s) under Sections 551.071-551.086 of the Texas Open Meetings Act. CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 2008 at o'clock (a.m.) (p.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 349-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CM/DCM/ACM: George C. Campbell, City Manager ~ SUBJECT: Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding projects to be included in Denton's FY 2009 Congressional Priority Project requests. BACKGROUND: Since fiscal year 2003, Denton has submitted Congressional priority project requests to our legislators for projects that qualify for special consideration, treatment or funding based on the needs of the community and the appropriateness for federal consideration. Many of Denton's initial requests were for transportation proj ects because of the delay in the reauthorization of TEA-21 and the need for improved roadways to handle Denton's growing population. Denton requested funding assistance so that projects could be expedited to meet growing vehicular traffic. Since our first submission, Denton has received in excess of $12 million in earmarked federal funds (Attachment 1). Congressional earmarks are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain due to growing number of requests and the lack of growth in funding availability. Because of the growing number of requests, increased information and detail must be provided to Congressional representatives with submitted project requests. Most Federal agencies require that the recipients of congressionally earmarked funds submit a proposal and that the proposal be approved by the agency before the funds will be released. Generally, successfully earmarked proj ects receive between $100,000 and $1 million per year for duration of one to three years. In preparation for making Denton's FY 2009 requests, staff reviewed our project funding needs, as well as the FY 2008 Congressional Priority Proj ect requests. The Airport Advisory Board and the Mobility Committee concurred with staff's recommendation on the Airport Safety and Security Enhancements request (Attachments 2 & 3). The Downtown Development Improvements and Regional Public Safety Training Facility requests remain the same as approved by City Council for FY 2008. The requests have been placed in a booklet that contains figures, photo s and other graphics (Attachment 4) . RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendation from boards, committees and staff is that Council approves the three recommended projects as our FY 2009 Congressional Priorities. These include: FY 2009 Congressional Priority Projects January 8, 2008 Page 2 Airport Safety and Security Enhancements $990,000 Downtown Development Improvements $700,000 Public Safety Training Facility/Technology $4,500,000 PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW: The Airport Advisory Board and the Mobility Committee have reviewed the Airport Safety and Security Enhancements request. Respectfully submitted: 5 5 ~ L y{~ r `~ L i i~{ I ~TitJ John Cabrales Jr. Public Information/Intergovernmental Relations Officer Attachments: Attachment 1: Congressional Funding Received Attachment 2: Airport Advisory Board Minutes for November 7, 2007 Attachment 3: Draft Mobility Committee Minutes for December 4, 2007 Attachment 4: FY2009 Congressional Priorities Attachment i CONGRESSIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS FUNDS RECEIVED JANUARY 2008 ZOOS Airport Taxiway Realignment $2,000,000 2004 Airport Runway Realignment $2,O4O,o00 Downtown Redevelopment Infrastructure erimeter sidewalks $700,000 2005 Downtown Multimodal Transporta~on Facili $3,200,000 Downtown Redevelopment Infrastructur erimeter sidewalks $200,000 2006 Airport Southeast Taxiway $2,000,000 Police Technology $150,000 IH-35E Bridge @ Loop 288 ~ US 77 $2,000,004 2007 The Federal Governument operated under a Continuin Resolution - no earmarks NA ZOOS Denton Public Safety Training Facility Technolo *$352,004 TOTAL FUNDS RECEIVED $12,642,404 * The FY 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Act includes this funding and President Bush is expected to sign the bill shortly. The Omnibus includes a two percent across-the-board cut for projects, which means this funding will be reduced to $344,960. Attachment 2 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2b 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 3b 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 AIRPORT ADVISaRY BOARD NOVEMBER 7, 2007 After determining that a quorum was present, the Airport Advisory Board convened for a Regular Meeting on Wednesday, November 7, 2007 at 5:30 p.m. in the Denton Civic Center Building in the Community Raom at 321 East McKinney, Denton, Texas. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Woolfo lk, Vice Chairman Dr. Smith, Mr. Brewer, Jim Clark, Mr. Brown, Mr. Eames, and Dr. Kristoferson arrived 5:40 p.m. BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Tim ,Whitman, Airport Manager, Julie Mullins, Administrative Assistant, Mark Nelson, Chief Transportation officer, Lori Shelton, City of Denton Planner. PUBLIC PRESENT: Jeff Soules, US Aviation Group, Mark Taylor, US Aviation Group ITEMS FaR INDIVIDUAL CUNSIDERATI(lN V. Receive a report, hold a discussion and provide a recommendation on projects to be included for the Denton Airport as part of the Zoo9 Congressional Priority Project request. Dr. Smith informed the Board and Airport Management that the Radar that the Tower should have is RCAD radar type remote Dolor arts display. Mr. Whitman said it is staff's recommendation to reuse the same Congressional request of $990,000.00 for security enhancements and radar since no action was taken in the current year. Mr. Whitman has been working with the FAA to ensure that the surplus equipment is compatible with DFW and will continue to work diligently with the FAA and Congressman Burgess' office to resolve this issue. Chairman Woolfollc clarified the motion to approve the recommendation on the projects to be included in the 2009 Congressional Priority Projects with the correction for the Radar name. Mr. Brewer made a motion to approve the 2009 Congressional Priority Projects. Mr. Eames seconded the motion. Motion carried b-o. Attachment 3 ~ DRAFT MINUTES 2 City Council Mobility Committee 3 Tuesday, December 4, 2007 4 s After determining that a quorum of the Mobility Committee of the Denton City Council was 6 present, the Chair of the Committee on the Mobility convened into a meeting on Tuesday, ~ December 4, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. in the City Council work session room, 215 E. McKinney Street, S Denton, Texas. 9 l0 Present: Chair Pete Kamp, Mayor Percy McNeill and Council Member Bob Montgomery 11 1 Z Also Present; George C. Campbell, City Manager 13 Howard Martin, ACM Utilities 14 Jim Coulter, Director Water Wastewater Utilities 15 Mark Nelson, Transportation Director ~ 6 Tim Whitman, Airport Manager ~~ John Polster, ITS ~ 8 Rachel Connell, Director of Membership, NASCO 19 Francisco Conde, Director of Special Projects & Communications, NASCO zo z1 ITEMS FaR INDIVIDUAL C~NSIDERATIDN 22 z3 4~ Receive a report, hold a discussion and consider a recommendation to City Council 24 on projects to be included for the Denton Airport as part of the 2009 Congressional zS Priority Project request. z6 z7 Nelson called on Whitman to present this item. Whitman stated that every year Congressional 28 requests are made and the City has been very fortunate in 200G to receive $2.81 b nvllion which 29 was utilized for the runway extension and, in 2005, received $2.205 million which was utilized for 3o the terminal and the taxiway reconstruction. 31 3z Last year a budget request was submitted in the amount of $990,000 to acquire a radar system 33 and to also add security enhancements which were fencing and gate items. Congress did not fund 34 that request. Staff discussed recommendations to be put in this year's request. There were 3s several options; go back with the same request or consider pulling the radar item out of that 3 6 request and to fund it with other city money. Staf f met with Larry Perkins with the FAA, 37 Congressman Burgess's staff as well as some members of the City Council. It was a good 38 meeting and the FAA basically stated if the City could find a way to come up with approximate 39 $350,000 to $450,000 to install the equipment it could get a DBRITE Radar system that has been 4o decommissioned. The equipment would be donated and once the City had installed it, it would be 41 signed over to the FAA which would then take over all maintenance responsibilities and maintain 42 it as FAA property. Once this equipment is replaced or upgraded and DFW's equipment is 43 upgraded, it will be upgraded at the FAA's cost making this a great opportunity for the City. 44 45 Mayor McNeill asked "the equipment would be donated and then purchased for $350,000?" 46 Whitman stated the $350,000 would be for the installation of the equipment. Whitman also stated 47 this would be a win/win situation and that it would get the equipment for the City and 4S Draft Minutes of the City Council Mobility Committee meeting Attachment 3 ~ December 4, 2007 2 Page 2 3 4 5 would give us radar access and would not lock the City out in the future to receive the next latest ~ and greatest technology. 7 8 Whitman next presented a second option for FY 2009 which would be to remove the radar g project request and submit a request in the amount of $990,OOO for security enhancements which Io would include two separate projects. The first project would be $750,000 identified for 20,000 1 ~ linear feet of security fencing and automated access gates. The current six foot security fencing ~ 2 could then be extended along the southeast perimeter of airport property to the northwest corner 13 of airport property. 14 15 Whitman also stated that in conversations with Congressman Burgess's, it was recommended that 16 staff keep the request around $1 million or less. Staff therefore recommends that the radar be 1 ~ pulled out of the Congressional request, look at alternative sources with city funds, and submit a 18 request in the amount of $990,000 for security fencing and improvements. 19 20 Mayor McNeill stated that during a spring meeting, Congressman Burgess stated he was very 2 ~ interested in supporting the security fencing, and that it would help with the City demonstrating 22 the cornnutment of moving forward with its own money to pay for the radar. 23 24 Chair Kamp stated she wanted to note that as, Kim Reasoner and Patricia Bostick from Burgess's 25 office, Larry Perkins from the FFA, Tim Whitman, Mark Nelson, Council Member Bob 26 Montgomery and John Cabrales talked about and provided history, it was realized there was a 27 better way to do this and the Congressman's representatives became very excited about it. It was 28 a very positive meeting and Larry Perkins from FFA was wonderful; very candid and very 29 supportive. 30 31 Montgomery stated that for the first time the person from FAA, Perkins, could answer questions. 32 Perkins stated there was no line item in the budget and that the City is currently number 21 in line 33 and the way to get from 21 to 1 in line would be to pay for the installation. 34 35 Ch~a~ir Kamp stated this is appropriate use of gas well money. 36 37 Mayor McNeill motioned to accept staff's recommendation of Option 2 for the $990,000 for 3 s fencing and the City find the money somewhere in the budget to install the donated radar 39 with a second from Council Member Montgomery. The motion was approved by a 3-0 4o vote. 41 42 Chair Kamp commented that Tim made a presentation at the Conference and she would like to 43 state what a great job he did in explaining the City's needs at the airport. 44 45 City fficial~ Mayor Perry McNeill Mayor Pro Tem Pete Kamp Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Joe Mulroy Councilmember Charlye Heggins Councilmember Jack Thomson Councilmember Chris Watts Councilmember Bob Montgomery CITY STAFF City Manager George Campbell Assistant City Manager Howard Martin Assistant City Manager Jon Fortune Assistant City Manager Fred Greene For more information please contact: John Cabrales Public Information/Intergovernmental Relations Officer 215 E. McKinney St. Denton, TX 76201 940-349-8509 FY 2009 Table of Contents PROJECTS PAGE Priority Projects: Denton Municipal Airport 2 `;. The City of Denton appreciates the delegation's support for this priority and fully re- spectfully request continued support for this prioority project. DTO plays an important role in the regional economy, serving as a general aviation hub for North Texas. As a result of substantial capital investments by the City of Denton and TxDOTAviation, the Denton Airport has increased the number of private developments on the field. These developments have in turn increased the airfield employment base by more than 40 percent and the development pace is projected to continue to grow. The Denton Airport is requesting $990,000 indiscretionary funding for security enhancements. These improvements include security fencing and controlled access points to increase airport security and wildlife control. This project is recognized in the current Airport Master Plan. FAA personnel have identified the lack of security fencing as a weakness that needs to be addressed. The installation of the security fencing will further facilitate the current growth trend on the facility as more and more corporate aircraft operators will only utilize secured facilities. Denton Municipal Airport [DTOI Safety and Security Enhancements 3; ~ t$ DENTON FY 2009 Denton Airport has approximately 240 based aircraft and experiences more than 100,000 operations per year with a large amount of corporate jet and a steady increase in air cargo activity. The airport attracts aircraft operations from all over the world due to its major maintenance facilities as well as its location and con- venience. The addition of the newly aligned primary taxiway has increased the safety and capacity of the airport for airport users. Completed projects over the past year at the airport include: • Completion of a new terminat and administration building. • Completion of a new;parallel taxiway which can serve as an emergency landing surface should the runway be closed or unusable. Future planned projects at the airport include: • The extension of the runway to 7;000 feet. • The design and construction of a new taxiway from the runway to the southeast side of the airport to improve development opportunities. For more information please contact: Airport Mark Nelson Chief Transportation Officer 5000 Airport Road Denton, TX 76207 940-349-7702 mark. nelson@cityofdenton. com The Hickory Street Corridor Project will link Downtown Denton's historic square (on the Na- tional Register of Historic Places) to the future Denton County Transportation Authority (DCTA) raitstation and the Multimodal Transit Facility on the east and to the`Universityof North Texas (UNT) to the west. This connectivity is critical to 4he City of Denton as we work o improve mobility to and through our Downtown Square. Also,. a major catalyst project that will create more than 130 new residential units and over 50,000 square feet of new office and retail space is in the planning stages. The project is located on the southeast corner of the Downtown Square. New, wider, safer and accessible sidewalks are needed to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic generated by new commercial development and the transit station in the Downtown area. Downtown Denton Development Improvements In the Summer of 2007, the City selected a site for the $3.1 million Downtown Denton Multimodal Transit Facility that will compliment the proposed DCTA commuter rail station off of E. Hickory Street and Railroad Street. The Hickory Street Corridor will be the critical link from the Downtown Denton Multimodal Transit Facility to historic Downtown area and to the Univer- sity of North Texas. The City greatly appreciates the federal funding the delegation obtained for this important project. Selected site for Multimodal Transit Facility Denton Downtown Development Improvements: Hickory Street Corridor Project FY 2009 Cedar Street Capital Improvement Project On August 20, 2007, work began on the Cedar Street Capital Improvement Project; we anticipate that it will be completed by March 2008. The Cedar Street Improvements will mirror the look of the square improvements, which were completed in 2001. The Cedar Street Project will replace all water and sewer lines, many of which are over 50 years old. The project will also widen sidewalks, making it ADA accessible for the first time in history. Street trees, benches, bike racks and pedestrian amenities will also be added. The estimated cost for this project is $1.2 million; more than $800;000 of it comes from CDBG Economic Development Initiative and Neighborhood Initiative funds. This. project will help enhance mobility and aesthetics as well as upgrade':utility lines on the west side of the Downtown Square: _.'v'. ;w The City of Denton appreciates the FY 2008 funding provided forthisproject,iis requesting.. $4.1 million indiscretionary funding for technology uses associated with the planned cdn- struction of astate-of-the-art joint police and fire regional public safety trairiing facility. The new facility presents the City of Denton an opportunity to become a leatler in setting higher standards,for quality emergency service training,which adds to homeland security pre- paredness and improved community safety. The City expects to exceed both the academic and technical requirements for emergency responders as well as responders from-the entire region. Partnerships with area colleges, as well as other areapublic safety agencies, are already being developed. , In November 2004, the City purchased an 88-acre site for the building. of this regional train- ing facility at a cost of $2.03 million. In July 2005, the Cityhired Kirkpatrick Architectural. Studio for $205,500 to work on the master plan for the facility. Several meetingshave been held with stakeholders of the training center, such as North CentralTexas College (NCTC), to establish their needs and criteria for this regional facility. In July 2007, the City Council approved almost $12.6 million for the construction ofthis regional training facility that will include: atwo-story residence burn building, outdoor class room, high rise burn building, an Urban Search and Rescue structural collapse area, a trench rescue site, a confined space rescue site, a 10-lane shooting range and a shoot house. There will also be a 20,500 square foot classroom that will allow public safety personnel from around the region to meet and exceed ongoing day-to-day training requirements from basic academies to advanced programs through our partnership with NCTC. This regional training will also improve mu- tual aid and inter jurisdictional relationships. Our hope is to open the regional public safety training facility sometime in early 2009. Denton Regional Public Safety Training facility FY 2009 Fire Station #7 The first phase of the regional public safety training facility began on April 30, 2007, with the opening of fire station #7 on a portion of this 88 acre site. This fire station was awarded a Gold Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating from the United States.Green Building Council (USGBC). This is only the second fire station in the natiorrto receive this rat- ing. This building was designed and built using LEED standards to provide a state of theart fire station and incorporate the concepts of sustainable site development;-water savings, energy efficiency, environmentally "friendly" materials selection, and-indoor eriyronmental quality. The r facility received 42 LEED points, 39 poirits are required fora Gold rating. The building serves as an educational tool that cam be used to demonstrate the benefit`s of LEED and Green Build- - ing designs. , The $4.1 million discretionary funding request wilF be used to fund the advanced Technical needs of this regional public-safety, training facility._Specificteehnology requests include ~ - $3:5 million to fund Use of Force ahd Driving simulators and,600,000 to'fund administrative/ classroom multimedia technology. ; h t Public Safety Fred Greene Assistant City Manager 215 E. McKinney St. Denton, TX 76201 940.349-8354 fred.g reeve@cityofdenton.com For more information please contact: AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development Department ACM: Fred Greene SUBJECT - MPC07-0002 (Cole Ranch) Receive a report hold a discussion and give staff direction on the proposed Cole Ranch Master Planned Community for approximately 3,256.92 acres of land, generally located west of Interstate 35 West, south of Tom Cole Road. BACKGROUND Applicant: SLF Cole Property, LP Dallas, TX The Cole Ranch Master Planned Community (Cole Ranch MPC) consists of approximately 3,256.92 acres and will include a variety of land uses that will provide opportunities for vertical and horizontal mixed-use developments. The development will consist of approximately 1,955 acres of Single-Family (NR-3) development, and approximately 342 acres of Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU & NRMU-12) development with multi-family, attached single-family, retail and office uses. The development will also contain 180 acres of Community Mixed Use (CM-G) zoned property, 301 acres of Employment Center (EC-C) zoned property, and 85 acres of Industrial Center (IC-E) zoned property (see Exhibit 2). The applicant is estimating there will be 1.9 million square-feet of retail development, 273,000 square feet of restaurant development, 2.0 million square-feet of office space and 1.6 million square-feet of industrial space when the development is built out in 2025. The estimated residential development will consist of 6,182 single-family homes with a density of 2.9 dwellings per acre, 2,621 attached single-family homes with a maximum density of 12 units per acre and 2,800 multi-family units with a maximum density of 30 units per acre. The community is being designed with higher density and more intense uses (office and retail) along the proposed Loop 288 right-of way and a more traditional suburban residential development towards the south and west. Two Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use Districts are proposed to provide higher density residential and neighborhood service oriented businesses to the surrounding single family detached residential areas. On July 18, 2006, the City voluntarily annexed approximately 3,406 acres into the city of Denton. Approximately 185 acres of the property is under contract to be sold to the Aldi Company for a distribution center and is not a part of this rezoning request. The remaining 3,256.92 makes up the Cole Ranch MPC. The City Council approved a rezoning from the initial zoning of Rural Residential (RD-5) to Industrial Center General (IC-G) for the Aldi property on December 4, 2007. The Denton Independent School District (DISD) has purchased a 90 acre high school site which will be part of Phase III of the development. A middle school site has also been finalized as part of Phase II and two elementary school sites are proposed, as shown on the development plan exhibit (See Exhibit 2). The exact locations have not been determined but the two elementary schools sites will be donated by the property owner to DISD. All four school sites make up approximately 165 acres of land within the Cole Ranch development. There are approximately 680 acres of open space included in the MPC. Much of the open space is made up of floodplain and Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs). The applicant will identify the ESA mitigation measures at the final plat process. The applicant will dedicate approximately 72 acres of park land for both passive and active recreational purposes as required by the city of Denton Park Land Dedication requirements. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on the evening of October 8, 2007 at Denton Fire Station #7 on Vintage Boulevard. Six people from the surrounding area and the University of North Texas were in attendance. Concerns were raised at the meeting regarding the light produced from the development and truck traffic on Underwood Road. Pursuant to Subchapter 35.7.12.2.D.1 of the Denton Development Code, the Cole Ranch MPC must comply with the Code, except where modifications are proposed. The applicant has submitted a MPC Zoning Document and Development Standards Document that outlines the alternative development regulations and standards that deviate from the provisions of the Denton Development Code. Only those uses listed in the tables below shall be permitted in each phase of the Cole Ranch development in the areas so designated on the Phasing Plan map. No use is permitted in any phase until the Development Plan Map for that phase has been approved, consistent with the defined uses and restrictions. NR-3 Single Family Residential NRMU-12 Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 dwellin units er acre ( g p ) NRMU Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use CM-G Community Mixed Use General EC-C Employment Center Commercial IC-E Industrial Center Employment The proposed MPC will deviate from following subchapters in the Denton Development Code: • Subchapter 5 Zoning Districts and Limitations • Subchapter 12 General Regulations • Subchapter 13 Site Design Standards • Subchapter 14 Parking Standards • Subchapter 15 Signs and Advertising Devices • Subchapter 17 Environmentally Sensitive Areas • Subchapter 19 Drainage Standards Subchapter 22 Gas Well Drilling and Production A significant portion of the Cole Ranch MPC is within the Airport Compatibility Land Use District 2 (ACLUD 2). The proposed MPC exceeds the requirements of the Subchapter 35.7.4 Denton Municipal Airport Overlay District by requiring both the Noise Mitigation Standards of Subchapter 3 5.7.4.12 and by requiring an Avigation Easement for the areas within the ACLUD2 (See Exhibit 1 for ACLUD 2 Boundaries within the Cole Ranch MPC). Subchapter 17 Environmentally Sensitive Areas of the Denton Development Code (DDC) provides for Alternative Environmentally Sensitive Area Plans to allow for deviations from the requirements of Subchapter 17. The applicant is proposing criteria for approval and standards to approve deviations from Subchapter 17. The Alternative Environmentally Sensitive Area Plans are approved by the City Council with a recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant is proposing the deviations from Subchapter 17 be approved by staff with the criteria and standards that will be codified in the Cole Ranch MPC and exceed the current requirements provided in the DDC. Subchapter 19 Drainage Standards in the Denton Development Code generally prohibits the development of a floodplain. The applicant is proposing to deviate from this requirement and provide standards and requirements to ensure the protection of the floodplain. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) July 18, 2006 City Council held the second and final reading of the Ordinance to voluntarily annex the Cole Ranch (approximately 3,406 acres). September 12, 2007 The Denton Planning and Zoning Commission received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction on the proposed Cole Ranch Master Planned Community. October 10, 2007 The Denton Planning and Zoning Commission received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction on the proposed Cole Ranch Master Planned Community. November 8, 2007 Denton Municipal Airport Board received a report and held a discussion regarding the proposed Cole Ranch MPC. The Board discussed the proposed avigation easement and how the development would affect future Airport growth. The Board unanimously voted to support the MPC zoning request. November 14, 2007 The Denton Planning and Zoning Commission received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction on the proposed Cole Ranch Master Planned Community. January 9, 2008 The MPC is scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission to hold a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to City Council regarding the MPC zoning. EXHIBITS 1. Proposed Development Plan Map 2. Proposed Phasing Plan Map 3. Current Zoning Map 4. Proposed Zoning Map 5. Future Land Use Map Prepared by: ~~ Lori Shelton, AICP Planner II Respectfully submitted: EXHIBIT 1 Proposed Development Plan Map EXHIBIT 2 Proposed Phasing Plan EXHIBIT 3 Current Zoning Map EXHIBIT Proposed Zoning Map EXHIBIT 5 Future Land Use Map Exhibit 6 Cole Ranch MPC Zoning Document Including Zoning Districts Limitations General Requirements Site Design Standards Parking Standards Signage Environmentally Sensitive Areas Gas Well Drilling and Production Floodplain Reclamation General Note: Except as clearly and specifically stated herein, the provisions of this document are subordinate to all ordinances of general application in the City of Denton, Texas. The provisions of this document do not modify or amend any ordinance of the City of Denton, and have no applicability whatsoever outside the Cole Ranch MPC. The terms of this document serve as limited exceptions to the general zoning standards of the City of Denton, only to the limited extent specified herein, and are intended to be construed narrowly and restrictively. Any stated exceptions to specific sections of any ordinance or land use standard shall apply only to the limited extent necessary to achieve the stated exception, and all other requirements of such cited provisions that are not specifically excepted shall continue to apply in full force and effect within the Cole Ranch MPC. Page -1 § 35.5. shall be excepted as follows: Upon review and approval of a detailed Development Plan Map for each phase, locating proposed land uses in a zoning category format, identifying site access, connectivity, and general public improvements, providing a table showing all the land uses, including the total acreage of each proposed land use and the total acreage of the project, and showing boundaries reflecting the phasing plan in conformity with the requirements otherwise associated with a Development Plan Map, pursuant to Denton Development Code 35.3.4., then only those uses listed in the tables below shall be permitted in each phase of the Cole Ranch development in the areas so designated on the Phasing Plan map. No use is permitted in any phase until the Development Plan Map for that phase has been approved, consistent with these defined uses and restrictions. If there is a question as to whether a use not listed below is permitted, the Director of Planning shall make a determination whether the use is permitted or prohibited. NR-3 Single Family Residential NRMU-12 Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 dwellin units er acre ( g p ) NRMU Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use CM-G Community Mixed Use General EC-C Employment Center Commercial IC-E Industrial Center Employment Zoning districts and limitations shall be the same as for DDC Sub-chapter 5, except as noted below. 35.5.2.2 is excepted to allow these Permitted Uses A. Equestrian Facilities (boarding of horses only) is a permitted use with an SUP in NR-3. B. High School is a permitted use in NR-3. School facilities in ACLUD zone are limited to athletic facilities and open space. No classrooms or administrative offices, except the athletic office, are permitted in ACLUD zone. C. Construction Materials Sales is a permitted use in CM-G. 35.5.2.3 General Regulations The following exceptions are allowed as part of the Subchapter 35.5.2.3 General Regulations Table: A. Regarding "Maximum density, dwelling units per acre," in all Neighborhood Residential categories, individual building permits or subdivision plats maybe approved with densities exceeding the maximums; however the density in any development pod as shown on the Development Plan Map may not exceed the Page - 2 maximum for that zoning category. Density will be calculated as base density as defined in Subchapter 23 of the Denton Development Code. B. Minimum side yard for non-attached buildings in NR-3 is 5 feet. C. Minimum landscaped area in NR-3 is 50%. D. Maximum lot coverage for single family attached uses only in NRMU-12 is 75%; Minimum landscape area is 25%. § 35.5.8. shall be excepted to provide the following additional limitations with respect to the zoning classifications and use designations defined by this document: 35.5.8 Limitations L(6) is excepted to allow the following: Permitted only on 2nd story and above, when an office, retail or other permitted commercial use is on the ground floor within 300 feet of any public collector or arterial street (as shown on the thoroughfare plan); otherwise, office or retail uses are not require . L(11) is excepted to allow the following: Drive throughs are allowed. Drive throughs and associated stacking may not be located between the building and street right-of way. L(17) is excepted to allow the following: Uses are limited to no more than 25,000 sf of gross floor area per use, except grocery stores, which maybe up to 65,000 sf of gross floor area. No exceptions may be allowed by SUP process. General Regulations shall be the same as for DDC Sub-Chapter 12, except as noted below: 35.12.5 Minimum Floor Area Requirements The first sentence is excepted to allow as follows: The minimum air-conditioned floor area requirement for single family dwellings, including modular homes or any pre-manufactured home in any zoning district is 1600 square feet per unit. 35.12.6 Minimum Residential Lot Size 35.12.6 is excepted to allow as follows: Each detached single family residential unit must be built on a minimum 4,500 square foot lot. Each attached single family residential unit must be built on a minimum 1,200 square foot lot. Page - 3 35.13.7 Tree Preservation and Landscaping Requirements 35.13.7.2.C shall be modified to include street right of way as a exemption The Landscape and Tree Canopy Requirements Table on page 13-14 of the DDC is excepted for NRMU andNRMU-12 zoning districts as follows: 1. In the NRMU-12 District, a 25% Tree Canopy Cover shall be required for single family attached uses only. 2. In the NRMU District, a 20% Tree Canopy Cover shall be required for commercial and vertical mixed use developments. Residential uses will provide a minimum of 40% tree canopy. 35.13.7.C Street Tree Requirements are excepted as follows: 35.13.7.C.3.a.11 Multl-Family Residential Townhome and Non-Residential Developments -spacing of street trees shall be one (1) tree for every 50 linear feet of street frontage, minimum. 35.13.8 Buffer and Screening Requirements 35.13.8.A.l.a Add the following sentence: No buffer is required when anon-residential ormulti-family use is abutting to a residentially zoned greenbelt /open space of 200 feet or more in width. 35.13.8.A.2.a.iii shall be added as follows: 111. A masonry wall constructed of a decorative concrete masonry unit, or faced with brick veneer with the finished side facing the residential use or zoning district; the masonry used for the buffer wall shall be the same as that used for the non-residential ormulti-family development. 35.13.10 Access, Parking and Circulation Requirements 35.13.10.B.1.C shall be excepted to read as follows: Parking lots with greater than 200 spaces shall be divided into separate areas and divided by landscaped areas or walkways at least 10 feet in width, or by a building or group of buildings. This applies only to a development with a single building of 65,000 square feet or larger. 35.13.10.C.2.b shall be excepted to read: b. A minimum 10 foot wide landscape area planted with one large tree for every 50 linear feet, except along areas where parking in front of buildings is permltte . Page - 4 35.13.10.C.3.a shall be excepted to read: a. Parking lots shall be separated from the street right-of way line by a minimuml5' landscape area to reduce visual impacts. 35.13.10.C.3.b shall be revised to read as follows: b. The 15 foot landscape area may overlap into a Public Utilities Easement (PUE) where such PUE exists adj acent to the street right-of way, but in no case may trees be planted within the PUE. 35.13.10.C.3.c shall be excepted to read as follows: c. A landscape berm with a maximum 1 on 4 side slope on both sides, or a 3 foot high wall made of any combination of wrought iron, masonry, stone or decorative concrete panels, shall be designed within the 15' landscape area to help screen the parking lot. 35.13.13 Site Development Requirements 3 5.13.13 . l .A shall be excepted to add the following: 8. Masonry Fireplace with projecting chimney mass 35.13.13.1 shall be revised to read as follows: B. Front-facing garage doors onsingle-family detached houses shall not occupy more than 40% of the total building frontage. Front-facing garage doors that are at least 3 0 feet behind the house front may exceed the 40% frontage minimum. Garages may extend beyond the house front on no more than 30% of lots in any phase. C. Houses with the same elevation (represented by "A" below) must be separated by a minimum of three lots whether located on the same side of the street or the opposite side. ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t f `~- J. Excepted from application. 35.13.13.2 Multiple Unit Residential Dwellings and Multi-Family Developments are excepted to read as follows: Page - 5 35.13.13.2.A.l.ishall be excepted to read as follows: Accessory structures such as carports and storage units (but not including garages, leasing offices, club houses or recreation centers) shall not be located along a public right-of way and/or private street system. 35.13.13.A.1.j shall be excepted to read as follows: Garages shall not be located along the portion of the building that fronts a public right-of way. When garages front a private street, they must observe a minimum set back of 20 feet from the street curb. Parking Standards shall be the same as for DDC Sub-chapter 14, except as noted below: 35.14.4 Spaces Required 35.14.4.A.1 shall be excepted as follows: Single family dwellings -Two (2) spaces per dwelling unit; in single family attached dwellings only, the spaces may be tandem parking spaces. Signage standards and procedures shall be the same as for DDC Sub-chapter 15, except as noted below: 3 5.15.17.5 of the Denton Development Code shall be amended to include the following graphic exception for effective area of signs within NR-3, NRMU-12 and NRMU districts. Requirements for Environmentally Sensitive Areas shall be the same as for DDC Sub- chapter 17, except as noted below: 35.17.7 Undeveloped Floodplain Development Standards Page - 6 35.17.A.6 shall be excepted to read as follows: Parks, open space, recreational uses, trails, walkways and bike paths (including paved trails, walkways and bike paths up to 12 feet in width). 35.17.7.C shall be modified by replacing the first sentence with "Filling or alteration of any flood plain of a stream that drains either more or less than one square mile is prohibited unless the proposed fill and/or alteration meets the following requirements: 1. Subchapter 19 -Drainage Standards except for any provision that prohibits filling or alteration of flood plain areas within a drainage basin of greater than one square mi e. 2. Any impacts to ESAs will be mitigated in conformance with Section 35.17.12 as modified by these Development Standards. 3. Any fill within any flood plain area shall be offset by an equal amount of excavation in the same general area resulting in no net loss of valley storage regardless of the size of the drainage basin. 4. The lowest finished floor elevation of all habitable residential structures shall be a minimum of 24 inches above the adjacent 100-year base flood elevation based on encroached stream conditions as contained in the appropriate Flood Insurance Study, or if unavailable, based on ultimate watershed development conditions. 35.17.8 Riparian Buffer and Water Related Habitat Development Standards 35.17.8.A.1 shall be excepted to read as follows: Up to 10% of the area maybe disturbed for public or private yard structures including but not limited to: gardens, yards, trails, and clearings, but which are no closer than 25 feet from the stream band or riparian buffer. No disturbance is permitted in delineated wetlands unless as permitted under a USCE Section 404 Permit and/or an approved ESA Mitigation Plan 3 5.17.8.A.10 add to include the following: Parks, open space, recreational uses, trails, walkways and bike paths are permitted within the jurisdictional areas subject to USAGE approval. However, encroachment of a total of one third of half of the width of the stream buffer as measured from the outer edge of the stream buffer inward is permitted. Trails and sidewalks can be located along only one side of the stream within the stream buffer. Pedestrian bridges are permitted encroachments across stream buffers. 35.17.12 Mitigation of Environmentally Sensitive Area Disturbance Section 35.17.12 shall be replaced in its entirety with the following: In the event that the Developer wants to propose impacts to the ESAs, then the following provisions shall apply. These provisions apply only to the proposed ESA impacts and mitigation. Any other deviations from the Denton Development Code would be addressed in accordance with the procedures for an Alternate Development Plan (ADP) in conformance with Section 35.13. Page - 7 1. Mitigation of any ESA disturbance will be allowed subject to approval of an ESA Mitigation Plan including any one or combination of the following measures: a. Enhancement of existing ESA's within the Cole Ranch MPC at a 2:1 ratio of enhanced ESA to original ESA. b. Relocation of the ESA to protected open space areas outside the original ESA areas on an acre- or-acre asis. c. Implementation of best management practices addressing impacts to ecological functions and water quality. Mitigation of any impacts to USCE jurisdictional areas will also serve as the mitigation for any impacts to ESAs that fall within the same impacted area. 2. ESA Mitigation Plan -Requirements An ESA Mitigation Plan shall include the following specific items: a. Delineation of existing ESAs based on the approved ESA Review and/or ESA Assessment. b. Overlay of proposed development activity necessitating the need to impact the existing ESAs. c. Delineation of ESAs impacted including a chart with each impact area numbered or lettered and an acreage or square footage calculation of the respective impacted area. d. Construction plans and details for the implementation of the ESA Mitigation Plan including plans for grading, planting, erosion control and irrigation (temporary or permanent). e. Specifications for construction methods and materials. f. A Mitigation Plan Summary Table providing calculations that demonstrate the appropriate mitigation ratio of enhanced or replaced ESA to existing ESA. g. An Inspection Schedule for the proposed improvements consistent with the type of improvements being proposed and the necessary timing to allow for city staff inspection. 3. ESA Mitigation Plan -Process An ESA Mitigation Plan will be submitted to the City for review concurrent with an application for preliminary plat for residential subdivision uses or with an application for a site plan and/or final plat for non-residential uses. Upon determination that the ESA Mitigation Plan is in conformance with the Denton Development Code and the Cole Ranch MPC Development Standards, the Director of Planning and Development will approve the ESA Mitigation Plan subj ect to any applicable conditions of approval. The Developer may appeal any non-approval action by the Director of any ESA Mitigation Plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with Section 35.3.7. Page - 8 The Developer may proceed with construction of the development project, including the mitigation improvements, upon the approval of the ESA Mitigation Plan, posting of a cash bond, surety bond or letter of credit in an amount equal to 100% of the estimated cost of the plantings and any other approvals and permits required by the Denton Development Code appropriate for the particular development project. The mitigation improvements will be inspected by City Staff during the construction period in accordance with the Inspection Schedule as described above and must be deemed substantially complete in accordance with the approved plans by the Director prior to issuance of building permits for residential projects (except for model homes) and prior to certificate of occupancy for non- residentialprojects. 4. ESA Mitigation Standards The standards by which any mitigation plan will be reviewed for approval will be dependent on the type of ESA being impacted and whether replacement and/or enhancement of the impacted ESA is being proposed. However, the following general guidelines will apply to all Cole Ranch ESAs and any proposed impacts and subsequent mitigation. 1. All development plans and plats shall use best efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to ESAs to the extent practical within the context of a master p anne community. 2. The total aggregate of impacted ESA acreage shall not exceed 25% of the baseline 503 acres of existing ESA on the Cole Ranch MPC as a result of residential or commercial development. Impacts to ESAs by or on behalf of federal and state entities and public utilities, as defined in Subchapter 23 of the DDC, shall not apply to the 25% maximum acreage impact. 3. Proposed mitigation for ESA impacts shall generally be in-kind and located within the Cole Ranch MPC area. 4. Proposed mitigation for ESA impacts shall take into consideration the resulting ecological function of the remaining area and water quality associated with storm water runoff resulting from any net loss of ESA. The following mitigation standards shall apply to any impacts to ESAs within an undeveloped floodplain, riparian buffer or water related habitat: 1. Mitigation of impacts shall be accomplished by a) replacement of the ESA, b) enhancement of an existing ESA or open space area, or c) a combination of both. 2. Replacement of ESAs shall be an acre-for-acre and based on an inventory of hydrology, ground cover, shrubbery and trees within the area of impact performed prior to the area being disturbed. Replacement of ESA vegetation can exceed the amount of original vegetation for the area, but in no case be less than originally existed. All replacement trees shall be a minimum of 2" caliper and shrubs shall be a minimum of one gallon container. The species of replacement trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be the same as practical to Page - 9 the vegetation being replaced with a deliberate effort being made to produce a sustainable environment free of undesirable plant materials consistent with the City's Native Plant List. Replacement streams shall have substantially the same hydrology and at least the same overall length as the original stream. 3. Enhancement of other existing ESAs or open space areas for mitigation of ESA impacts shall be provided on a minimum 2:1 ratio of enhancement to original ESA acreage. The 2:1 ratio shall apply to the acreage being impacted and mitigated. All enhancement trees shall be a minimum of 2" caliper and shrubs shall be a minimum of one gallon container. The species of enhancement trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be the same as practical to the vegetation being replaced with a deliberate effort being made to produce a sustainable environment free of undesirable plant materials consistent with the City's Native Plant List. 5. ESA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting The Developer will prepare an annual report each year for three consecutive years beginning 12 months following the commencement of the implementation of an ESA Mitigation Plan for the purposes of describing the cumulative construction work that has been performed up to the date of the reporting period and to report on the current survivability of the plantings. These annual reports will be submitted to the city for review and inspection. 6. ESA Planting Survivability and Replacement Upon completion of the three-year monitoring and reporting period, the City shall inspect the plantings and determine whether ninety percent (90%) of the plantings are healthy and have a reasonable chance of surviving to maturity. Upon such a finding, the City shall release the currency, bond or letter of credit. In the absence of such a finding, the Applicant shall be notified to replace any unhealthy or dead plantings. If the applicant does not take remedial steps to bring the property into compliance, the City shall make demand for payment on the cash bond, surety bond, or letter of credit. The City may use all legal remedies to enforce this provision in addition to making demand on the security provided herein. Gas Well Drilling and Production standards shall be the same as for DDC Sub-chapter 17, except as noted below: 35.22.3.A shall be excepted to read as follows: The drilling and production of gas within M. T. Cole Ranch MPC shall be permitted only on those gas well tracts designated on the Development Plan Map, provided that no residential structure or place of assembly, institution or school exists within two hundred feet (200') from the wellhead and provided that the drilling and production of gas meets the following requirements: Page -10 1. All applicable standards forth in Section 35.22.5, Standard Conditions for Gas Well Drilling and Production. 2. An approved Gas Well Development Plat and a Road Damage Remediation Agreement are on file with the Director. 3. A Gas Well Permit has been issued by the Fire Marshall. 4. A Watershed Protection Permit for wells located in the Flood Fringe or other ESA's. These requirement will apply whether the gas well or structures were constructed first. 35.22.3.B shall be deleted and Items C, Dand Eshall be re-lettered to become Items B, C and D . Drainage Standards shall be the same as set forth in DDC Subchapter 19 except as follows: 35.19.4.D.1 Floodplain Restrictions The second sentence shall be replaced with the following: These floodplain areas shall be preserved from all destruction or damage resulting from clearing, grading or dumping of earth, waste or material, or stumps, unless the proposed fill or alteration of the floodplain is part of a Master Planned Community (MPC) and the resulting hydraulic condition is consistent with the requirements of Sections 35.19.5 and 35.19.6 and these Cole Ranch Development Standards. 35.19.4.D.2 Creek Restrictions The first sentence shall be replaced with the following: MajoN cheeks shall Nemain in an open natural condition except foN peNmitted fills and alterations that are a part of a MPC and consistent with the requirements of Sections 35.19. S and Section 35.19.6 and these Cole Ranch Development Standards; smaller creeks or drainage ways may be channelized if allowed by Subchapter 17 pNOVided they meet the criteNia of the DNainage CNiteria Manual. 35.19.6.I Floodway and Drainage Related Minimum Elevations l .a shall be replaced with the following: Lots shall have a minimum elevation for the finished grade of the buildable area (including parking areas) of the lot of one (1) foot above the adjacent 100 yeah base flood elevation (based on encroached stream conditions as contained in the appropNiate Flood Insurance Study oN, if unavailable, based on ultimate watershed development conditions) for non-residential land uses and a minimum elevation of one and a half (1. S) feet above the adjacent 100 yeah base flood elevation (based on encroached stream conditions as contained in the appropriate Flood Insurance Study oN, if unavailable, based on ultimate wateNShed development conditions) for residential land uses. 35.19.6.E Procedures for Floodplain Alteration Page -11 The first sentence shall be replaced with the following: Fill and/or alteration of flood plains which is not unreasonably damaging to the environment is permitted wheNe it will not cNeate otheN flood pNOblems. 35.19.6.N.3 Valley Storage The last two sentences of this paragraph shall be replaced with the following: The City restricts the valley stoNage loss to zero percent (0%) reduction for all creeks. Excavation designed to offset any loss in valley stoNage as a result of fill in the floodplain shall be performed within the same area as the fill placement in an effoNt to keep the base flood elevation Nesulting from the fill and excavation as close as possible to the original base flood elevation. In sections of the stream wheNe this is not pNactical, the City EngineeN may approve valley stoNage excavation either upstream or downstream of the floodplain fill as long as there is no incNease on the base flood elevation on any adjacent propeNties and there aNe no adverse impacts upstream or downstream of the property. In no case shall any rise in the base flood elevation be moNe than one foot even on the subject property. During the construction process, any fill in the floodplain shall be perfoNmed at the same time as the respective excavation to Nesult in no net loss of valley storage at any given time. Drainage Criteria Manual shall be the same as set forth in the DDC Subchapter 19 except as follows: Section 2.6 Floodway Development The first sentence shall be replaced with the following: Developments other than flood contNOl structuNes shall not be peNmitted within the 100 year floodway in accordance with Sections 3516 and 3519 of the Denton Development Code of Ordinances governing flood pNOtection. Section 8.1.A Open Channels -Applicable Design Criteria The first sentence shall be replaced with the following: All channels with contributing drainage basins larger than one square mile shall remain in their natural condition except as part of the floodplain reclamation proposed for Cole Ranch MPC in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter 19, the Drainage Criteria Manual and these Cole Ranch 1l~IPC Development Standards. Section 12.2 Floodway Fringe Development The first sentence shall be replaced with the following: Development of the floodway fringe will be allowed provided the following criteNia have been met: Subsection A shall be replaced with the following: Minimum finished floor elevations for proposed development areas within the floodway fNinge shall be eighteen (18) inches above the 100 yeah fNequency wateN suNface elevation (based on encroached stream conditions) for non-Nesidential Page -12 land uses and twenty fouN (24) inches above the 100 year frequency wateN suNface elevation (based on encroached stream conditions) for residential uses. Appendix A Definitions The title of the definition for "Flood Fringe" shall be changed to "Floodway Fringe" to be consistent with Section 12.2. 35.22.5 Standards for Gas Well Drilling and Production 35.22.S.A.2.n shall be excepted to read as follows: All well heads, storage tanks, separation facilities or other mechanical equipment located within 200' of an adjacent right of way or property and not within a floodplain shall be screened from the residential property with an 8' high solid screen cedar fence, good side facing the residential property. 35.22.S.A.2.o shall be added to read as follows: Each leased tract for gas well drilling and production shown on the Development Plan Map shall have a perimeter buffer 50 feet in width, extending around the full internal perimeter of the tract which consists of undisturbed ground with native vegetation. No grading, clearing, grubbing or scarring of the ground is permitted within this 50' buffer zone. 35.22.S.A.3.b shall be excepted to read as follows: Directional lighting shall be provided for the safety of gas well drilling and production operations and shall be provided so as to not cause light levels greater than .5 fc to fall on the perimeter property line, measured 4' 0" above the ground level. § 35.5. shall be excepted to establish the following: DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP: Prior to submitting any preliminary plat the Developer will submit and obtain approval of a Development Plan Map for each phase. The Development Plan Map shall locate proposed land uses in a zoning category format, identify site access, connectivity, and general public improvements, provide a table showing all the land uses, including the total acreage of each proposed land use and the total acreage of the project, and show boundaries reflecting the phasing plan, along with other requirements established or incorporated by the Denton Development Code, as amended. A Development Plan Map for the Cole Ranch MPC may be reviewed and approved at one time or for each phase, in accordance with § 3 5.7.12 of the Denton Development Code, as amended, With each submission of a Development Plan Map, the developer shall submit a summary of the detached single-family unit count, including but not limited to the number of units proposed in the preliminary plat, the total number of units proposed to date and the remaining number of units. Notwithstanding any other provision of this document, no use shall be allowed in any phase, lot or parcel unless and until a Development Plan Map authorizing such use has been approved for that phase. Page -13 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development Department ACM: Fred Greene SUBJECT Z06-0029 and Z06-0030 (Rayzor Ranch) Receive a report and hold a discussion on proposed amendments to the Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District encompassing approximately 410 acres of land located generally on both sides of U.S. Highway 380 (West University Drive), between Interstate Highway 35 and Bonnie Brae Street; providing for a zoning change from Neighborhood Residential 6 (NR-6) and Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning districts to base zoning districts of Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) for approximately 87 acres of the site south of U.S. 380 as well as amending of the development standards for the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and establishing development standards (including but not limited to permitting single family detached, single family attached, multifamily and office uses) applicable to a portion of the subject property which lies south of U. S. Hwy 3 80; and amending Chapter 3 5, Subchapter 7 of the City of Denton Code of Ordinances, "Denton Development Code", "Special Purpose and Overlay Districts" to amend section 35.7.13 "Rayzor Ranch Overlay District". BACKGROUND Applicant: Allegiance Development Dallas, TX Allegiance Development has submitted a request to rezone a portion of the Rayzor Ranch Development and amend the existing Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District. The entire subject property encompasses approximately 410 acres of land located generally on the north and south sides of U. S. Highway 3 80 (West University Drive), between Interstate Highway 35 and Bonnie Brae Street (See Exhibit 1). The parcel north of U.S. 380 contains approximately 153 acres (Northern Tract) and is currently undeveloped except for a vacant self storage facility (partially demolished). The applicant proposes to construct a combination of retail and single family residential uses. The parcel south of U.S. 380 contains approximately 257 acres (Southern Tract) and is undeveloped (a single family structure was recently removed). The applicant is proposing to develop a combination of retail (pad sites and an outdoor mall), residential (single family and multifamily), two hotels, offices, museums and park uses. On March 27, 2007, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Northern Tract from "Neighborhood Centers", "Existing Land Use" and "Community Mixed Use Centers" land use designations to "Regional Mixed Use Centers" and "Neighborhood Centers" land use designations. The Council also approved the first phase of the Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District for the entire 410 acre Rayzor Ranch site and a rezoning of 53.65 acres of the Northern Tract from Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 (NRMU-12), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Community Mixed Use General (CM-G) zoning districts to a base zoning district of Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) as modified by the Overlay District On May 15, 2007, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Southern Tract from "Neighborhood Centers" to "Regional Mixed Use Centers" and "Neighborhood Centers" land use designations. The Council also approved the second phase of the Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District which amended the standards of the District and provided for a zoning change on approximately 223 of the total 410 acres of land within the District from Neighborhood Residential 6 (NR-6), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 (NRMU-12), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Community Mixed Use General (CM-G) zoning districts to a base zoning district of Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D). The zoning change request included approximately 53 acres within the Northern Tract and 170 acres within the Southern tract. The City Council is being asked to consider the third phase of the Rayzor Ranch project at this time, which includes the following: 1. Rezoning approximately 87 of the total 410 acres from NR-6 and NRMU zoning districts to base zoning districts of NRMU and RCC-D as further modified by the Overlay District. The subject 87 acres are located south of U.S. 380. No additional rezoning of the Northern Tract is being proposed at this time. 2. Amending the 410 acre Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District to make minor modifications and corrections as well as incorporate new standards that if approved would: a. Permit single family detached (up to 185 units), single family attached (up to 496 units), multifamily (up to 750 units) and office uses in the Southern Tract subject to Section 35.5.9 of the Denton Development Code (see GENERAL ISSUES, Residential Development below). b. Correct the zoning boundary description to match subsequent plats. c. Replace the Master Site plan with the most updated version to reflect the latest development layout. d. Add language that clearly defines park and open space maintenance shall be by Homeowners Association or Property Owners Association. e. Ensure all ordinance exhibits are correct. f. Correct conflicting language between wood fence and masonry wall requirements as they are located behind the large retail boxes. g. Delay requirement to install buffer landscaping on Bonnie Brae until after DME substation and a proposed 36" waterline have been completed. 2 h. Allow residential phases to move forward conceptually, require detailed site plan at a later time. i. Require Specific Use Permits for all gas well development. The final phase of the Rayzor Ranch rezoning and Overlay District amendments should include the remaining 46 acres of the site north of U.S. 380 on which single family and/or drainage facilities are being proposed. The applicant's request for special sign consideration will also be brought forward for public hearing at a later date. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW 1. December 6, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Proposed Mobility Plan Amendment for Rayzor Ranch 2. January 10, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing Regarding Proposed Mobility Plan Amendment for Rayzor Ranch (The Commission recommended approval 7-0) 3. February 20, 2007 City Council Public Hearing Regarding Proposed Mobility Plan Amendment for Rayzor Ranch (The Council approved 7-0) 4. February 21, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Northern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment 5. February 28, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Proposed Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 6. March 7, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Proposed Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 7. March 14, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session and Public Hearing Regarding Northern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and First Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0) 8. March 27, 2007 city Council Public Hearing Regarding Northern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and First Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District (The City Council Approved 7-0) 9. April 2, 2007 City Council Work Session Regarding Southern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Remaining Phases of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 10. April 18, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding Work Session Regarding Southern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Remaining Phases of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 11. May 9, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session and Public Hearing Regarding Southern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Second Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and Rezoning. (The Commission recommended approval 7-0) 12. May 15, 2007 City Council Public Hearing Regarding Completion of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Second Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District (City Council Approved 7-0) 13. November 28, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session and Public Hearing Regarding Third Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and Rezoning. (The Commission recommended approval 6-0) 3 F,XTTTRTTC 1. Aerial Overview of Entire Subject Property 2. Site Plan of Northern Tract 3. Existing Zoning for Northern Tract 4. Site Plan of Southern Tract 5. Existing Southern Tract Zoning 6. Proposed Southern Tract Zoning Prepared by: ;.:.. ~.~ .r.. ~. ~~ k. >> • _. ... ..A ~i. Chuck Russell, AICP Planner III Respectfully submitted: Brian Lockley, AICP Interim Director of Planning & Development 4 EXHIBIT 1 Aerial Overview of Entire Subject Property EXHIBIT 2 Site Plan of Northern Tract EXHIBIT 3 Existing Northern Tract Zoning EXHIBIT 4 Site Plan of Southern Tract _: ~- 1'11 T! ~ ,...~ ,,::.... ............... ~#f ,a l ~~_ . .~ i A <, t ~r ~~ t 4 1' E F ~!<a~ 1 1 .i ` k E ~ 8 .: ~~. b.... p, p,: $~ ~~~ ~' ~ ` '~~~ EXHIBIT 5 Existing Southern Tract Zoning EXHIBIT 6 Proposed Southern Tract Zoning 10 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Fire ACM: Fred Greene ~TIR.TECT Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Ambulance Agreement between the City of Denton and Denton County for ambulance services; and declaring an effective date. BACKGROUND The Interlocal Agreement for ambulance service between the City of Denton and Denton County began in 1980 and provides for emergency medical service to Denton County within the designated area (see map in agreement). Each year a new agreement and ordinance is presented to the Denton City Council for the next fiscal year approving the fee the County will pay to the City of Denton for service using aCounty-wide funding formula based on population served, number of ambulance calls in the County area and the rural square miles in the County. The population and mileage figures used are based on numbers obtained from the North Central Texas Council of Governments. This ongoing Interlocal Agreement is often delayed in the County's legal approval process, which also includes review by the Denton County Fire Chiefs Association as well as, approval by the Commissioners Court as part of their budget process. After the City of Denton signs the Agreement, the County Commissioners take their official action. Even though the contract is approved after its starting date, the Agreement still remains effective from October 1, 2007 with no reductions in revenues. Denton County budgeted $874,998 for ambulance funding in FY 2008 which is the same amount they budgeted in 2007 but up from $800,000 allocated in 2006. The total estimated fee of $113,949.47 as the City of Demon's share is based on the funding formula of 33% for readiness; 33% for number of runs; and 33% for rural square miles with the following estimated ratios: 1. A fixed readiness sum for a population of 110,950 based on $0.6185 per capita for an estimated maximum amount of $68,624.31. 2. A sum of $305.09 per ambulance run estimated to be 106 runs for an estimated maximum amount of $32,339.54. This sum is based upon the number of runs made in the County areas for fiscal year 2007. 3. A fixed sum of $579.7146 per rural square mile based on 22.40 rural miles in the agreed operating territory for an estimated maximum amount of $12,985.61. Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 The City of Denton lost the Small City Ambulance contract with Krum in 2005-2006 and lost the contract with Sanger beginning October 1, 2006. The City also lost some rural square miles when the Argyle Fire Department formed an Emergency Services District (ESD) in 2007. This resulted in a loss of population, calls, and rural square miles compared to 2006 and 2007 as indicated in Table 1. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 READINESS- POPULATION; County Population 489,263 501,975 563,040 539,863 471,558 Denton Population 109,162 109,162 124,957 100,950 110,953 Denton's % of Total 22.3% 21.7% 22.1% 18.7% 23.5% County Funding Formula Rate 0.5110 0.4848 0.4736 0.5403 0.6185 County Readiness Funding Total $250,000 $243,333 $266,666 $291,666 $291,666 Readiness Funding to Denton $55,778 $52,916 $59,181.91 $54,539.18 $68,624.31 EMS AMBULANCE RUNS: Total County Ambulance Runs 712 609 708 745 956 Denton Runs to County 275 104 235 117 106 Denton's % of Total 38.6% 17.1% 33.2% 15.7% 11.09% County Funding Formula Rate $351.12 $399.56 $376.6469 $391.4980 $305.09 County Runs Funding Total $250,000 $243,333 $266,666 $291,666 $291,666 Runs Funding to Denton $96,558.99 $41,554.40 $88,512.02 $45,805.26 $32,339.54 RURAL SQUARE MILES; Unincorporated Square Miles 551.79 550.79 570.79 537.56 503.12 Denton's Covered Square Miles 214.83 211.83 157.77 32.02 22.40 Denton's % of Total 38.9% 38.5% 38.5% 6.1% 4.5% County Funding Formula Rate $453.07 $441.79 $490.3796 $542.5749 $579.7146 Runs Funding Total $250,000 $243,333 $266,666 $291,666 $291,666 Rural Sq. Miles Funding Total $97,335.22 $93,584.18 $73,708.18 $17,373.25 $12,985.61 TOTAL COUNTY EMS FUNDING $750,000 $730,000 $800,000 $874,998 $874,998 COUNTY FUNDING TO DENTON $249,672.21 $188,054.58 $221,402.1.2 $117,717..69 $113,.949.4:7 Percentage of Total Funding 33.3% 25.8% 27.7% 13.5% 13.0% Table 1 OPTIONS Approve ordinance amendment or deny ordinance amendment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed ordinance and agreement. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) On December 6, 2005, the City Council discussed the Ambulance Contract with Denton County and gave staff direction to continue the funding agreement with the County with annual discussion during the budget process. Because this is the third contract since that comprehensive Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 3 discussion, staff will present a complete review of ongoing actual costs to deliver fire services to the County in its budget process for FY2008-09 and will again seek Council's direction in regards to future agreements with the County for ambulance services in the County. The annual contract amounts are determined by the Commissioners Court. Last year's County ambulance contract was approved by the City Council on December 12, 2006. FISCAL INFORMATION The estimated ambulance fee for the County is $113,949.47 which is a decrease from the last contract amount of $117,717.69 due to reduced contracted services to Denton County in the coming isca year. EXHIBITS Ordinance Agreement District Map Respectfully submitted: Ross Chadwick Fire Chief s:l~ur ~ncumentslordinance~1071ambulance agreement ~~unty.do~ ORDINANCE N~. AN ORDINANCE ~F THE CITY ~F DENTIN, TE}~A AFPR~VIN AND AUTH~R~~~ THE CITY MANAGER T~ EXECUTE AN TNTERL~CAL ABULAI~CE AREEIVIEN~T BETWEEN THE CITY ~F DENTIN AND DENTIN COUNTY FAR AN~B~TLANCE ERV"ICE; AND DECLAR~N AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE C~L~NCIL ~F THE CITY ~F DENTDN HEREBY ORDAIN: ECTI~N ~ . The C~ Cor~ncil of the City of Denton hereby .ppro~ve~ an Agreement between the City of Denton and Denton. County for ambulance er~ice~, a copy of v~h~ch i~ attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The City 1Vlanager, or h~~ des ee, is hereby authorr~ed to execute thl~ Agreement on behalf of the City. SECTION ~. Th1 Ordlnat~ce shall become effect~~re ~nledtate~y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED till t~1e day of ~~07. PERRY R. IVICNE~L,L, MAYOR ATTEST: IENN~'ER SALTERS, CITY SECRETARY ~~. APPROVED A TO LEGAL FOR1V~: ED7N III. SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY BY; ? ~ a THE COUNTY OF DENTON § § CITY OF DENTON STATE OF TEXAS § I~TERL~AE '~~~ERATZ~N AREEIVIENT A1NULA~E ERVIE TAI AClEENfi is ruade and entered into this ^,,,` day of ~~7, by and between Denton bounty a po~it~cal sub.visian of the Mate of Texas, here~naf~er referred to as ~'C~UNTY", and the pity of Denton, municipal corporation, located in Denton bounty, Texas, hereinafter referred to as ~'AEN~Y". wH~~EA, AUNTY is a duly organized political subdivision of the Mate of Texas engaged ire the administration of county government and related services far the benefit of the citizens of Denton bounty; and ~EREA, AEN~Y 1s a n~unic~pal corparat~on, duly organized and operating under the laws of the Mate of Texas and engaged In the provision of ambulance service and related services for the benefit of the citizens of pity of Denton; and wHEIA.~, A~EN~Y is an owner and operator of certain ambulance vehicles and other equipment designed for the transpar~atian of persons wha are sicl~, in~i~rned, ar injured and has xn its employ trained personnel whose duties are related to the treatment of said individuals and the use of such vehicles and equipment; and ~EREA, ~~UNTY desires tv obtain emergency a~nbu~ance and rebated services far the benefit of ~resldents of AUNTY l~vln ~n unlncorparated areas of ~IJI~TY which A~EN~`Y is capable of providing; and wHEIA, the provision of emergency ambulance and rebated services is a avern~nentat function that serves the public health and welfare and is of mutual concern to both ~IJNTY and A~EN3~; and ~lA, ~~UNTY desires to expend bounty funds to defray the expense of establishing? operating, and malntaln the emergency ambulance service in the bounty; and wI~E~EA, ~UNT~Y and AGENCY mutually desire to be subject to and contract pursuant to the pravlslons of avernent dude, chapter 791, the Interlocal Coaperatian Act, and ectivn 774.~~3, Health and safety bode, 2U07-2{~8 ~nter~ocal ~~opera~ion A~greemen~-Ambulance 5e~iceslIlenton - Page 1 of ? } t a ~ ' ~~ THEREFORE, ~UNT~ and ~~l~~Y, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and Agreements stated herein, agree as follows: I. TERM The term of this Agreement sha11 be far the period of October 1, ~~07 to and through epte~nber 3~, ~~a8. ~~. DE~'IITI~N As used herein, the words and phrases hereinafter set forth shall have the meanings as follows: A. "Emergency"' shall mean any circumstance that calls for immediate aotion and in which the element of time in transporting the sick, wounded or inured far medical treatment is essential to the health or life of a person or persons. whether an emergency, in fact, exists is solely up to the discretion of the A~~Y. Far dispatch purposes only, "err~ergency" shall include, but not be limited tv: ~. The representation by the individual requesting ambulance service that an immediate need exists far the transportation of ~. person from any location within the agreed operating area of.~I~~I~Y to a place where emergency medical treatment may be obtained; or 2. The representation by the individual requesting ambulance service that an immediate need exists for the transportation of a person from any location within the agreed operating area of ANY to the closest medical facility. B ""Rural area"" means any area within the boundaries of 0'I'Y but outside the corporate limits of all incorporated cities, tawny and villages within ~UNT~. C '"Urban area.'" means any area w~thln the corporate lun~ts of an Incorporated c~ty~ town or village within I~OCINTY. D "Emergency ambulance call"' means a response tv a request for ambulance service by the personnel of A~ENY 1n a sltuatlon mvvlving an emergency, as defined above, by an ambulance vehicle. A single response to a call may involve the transportation of more than one person at time but shall be considered as only one call. r~~, ~~c~ The services to be rendered under this Agreement are the ambulance services normalXy rendered by A~~~~ to citizens of pity of Denton in circumstances of emergency but which services will now be extended to all citizens of '~I~1~T~ residing in. the unincorporated areas of 207-208 Interlocal Co~per~tion Agreement-Ambz~lance ~erv~ceslDent~n - Page 2 0~ ~ ~L~N'I'Y within the operating territory or ~u~Fisdiction of AG~EN~ as agreed tab AI~LNY and ~IJNT in this Agreement and as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and Inca orated by reference. It xs recognized that the officers and employees of A~LN'Y have the duty and responsibility of rendering ambulance services to citizens of A~ENY' and C~UNT'Y. In the performance of these duties and respons1b11~ties, it shall be within the sale responsibilit and y discretion of the afters and employees of A~LNY. to determine priorities in the dis atoh~n p and use of such equipment and personnel and the judgment of the officer or employee shall be final. . I~". PERF~I~ANE OF SER'~IE AENI~Y shall devote sufficient time and attention to insure the perfa~.nar~ce of all duties and obligations of ALNY under this and shall provide jlnediate and direct supervision of the ALN~Y employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors andlor laborers engaged in the perfarn~ance of this Agreement for the mutual benefit of AI~~NY and ~N~~a ~. LIAISON ~~'FICLI~ AUNTY shall designate the bounty 3udge to act on behalf of ~UNT'Y and to serve as 'Liaison ~fficer~' betv~een ~~UNTY and A~ENY. The bounty fudge or her desig,ated substitute shall devote sufficient time and attention to insure the performance of all du~'es and obligations of C~IINTY under this Agreement and shall provide for the immediate and direct supervision of employees, agents, contractors} sub-contractors andlor .laborers of ~IJN'~Y engaged in the performance of this Agreement, ~I, ~NiPENATIIIN AUNTY agrees to pay to ALNY an estimated fee of $113,49.45 based on a fura.ding formula as follov~s: l . A fixed sum based on a population percentage . 1 ~5 per capita; said sung can~putes to ~5,~~4.31, ~~ A fixed sum of $45.~9~~ per ambulance transport for an estimated ~naxin~u amount of ~Z,~39~54. Said sum is based upon the number oftranspar~s made by AENY in fiscal year ~a~7. 2~~7-2408 ~nterlecal Coopera~on Agreement-Ambulance serv~cesl~ent~n - Page ~ of 7 3. A fixed sum based on 2~.4~ rural miles in the agreed operating territory; said scum computes to I2,S5. ~ 1. The first and third stuns are based upon populatia~ and mileage figures obtained from the ~v~.h Central Texas Council of -averments. The second sung is based u an h . . p t e defimt~an of an ambulance call far purposes of this Agreement. Fa ent shall not be allowed for an inst y ante to which patient is not transported. Consistent with the reporting procedures described below, A~N~ shall receive payrr~ent far transporting the patient regardless of the service delivery area in which the call originated, Requests for payment shall be submitted on the standardised anlbulanoe transportation reporting farm approved and provided by ~~UNTY, It . sha11 be the responsibility of ANY to fully complete the forms and to provide complete and accurate patient information. Requests for payment shall be submitted within five ~5} days of the performance of service by A~~I~Y. Requests not timely submitted shall not be considered for payment, Requests for payment may be submitted by personal delivery, U.; mail, facsimile, or computer telephone lin1~ to the office of the Denton County Fire 14arshal. The date of submission shall be the date the fully documented request ~s reserved ~n sold aff~ce. ~~~. TER~NATI~N This Agreement nay be terminated at any time by either A~ENY or COUNTY giving sixty ~~~} days advance notice ~. writing to the ether party. In the event of termination by either party, A~N~Y shall be compensated pro rata. for all services performed to termination date, together with reimbursable expenses authorized by this Agreement then due and awed. should A~1~Y be avercornpensated on a pro rata basis for all services performed to the termination date andlor be overcompensated far reimbursable expenses, ~'UNTY shall be reimbr~rsed pro rata for all such overcornpensatian, Acceptance of such reirnbursen~ent shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that nay athervvise arise out of this Agreement. VIII, F~l~ANCIAL RE~~RU AEN~Y agrees to rrial~e its financial records available for audit andlor review by ~~J~TY upon request by ~[11~TY. 2007-2008 Interlocal Cooperation Agreement-Ambu~ar~ce erviceslDer~ton - Page 4 of 7 l~l- I~EP~NI~ILIT~ ~~' ~I]NTY ~iJNTY, to the extent allowed by law, shall be responsible for the acts and negligence of ail officers, employees and agents of ~UNT~ engaged in the erformance of this p Agreement. R~PQNIBILIT~ ~F ALN~' ALNY, to the extent allowed by law, shall be responsible for the acts and negligence of all officers, employees and agents of ALN~ engaged in the perfar~nance of this Agreement. I. DLFAI~LT In the event of any default any of the covenants herein contained, this ,Agreement may be terminated t the discretion of the non-defaulting party if such default cantir~ues fora eriod of ten ~ 1 ~} days after notice in Ming to the defaulting party of such default and the intention to declare this Areerrxent terminated. [Jnless the default is cured, this Agreement shall terminate. III. ~VERNENTAL I TY The fact that C~NTY and ANDY accept certain responsibilities relating to the rendering of ambulance services under this Agreement as a part of their responibili far providing protection far the public health makes it imperative that the performance of these vital services be recognised as a gavernrnental function and that the doctrine of governmental 1n~munlty ~hal1 be, and is hereby, inval~ed to the extent possible under the Iaw. Neither A~EN~ nor I~~UNT~ waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive any immunity ar defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of overnenta.~ g powers and functions. DIV. ~NTII A1EENT This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreerrzent between ,A~LN~ and RUNTY and supersedes all prior ne atiations, ~ resentations andlor A ee g ep gr ~nents, ether written or oral. This Agreement may be amended anly by written, instrument si ed b bath y . parties. 2~0']-208 It~terlocal Coo~ratF~n Agreement-Ambulance ~erviceslDenton Page 5 ~f? l ~ 4 ; ~, ~~ T 7 ~~ ~l' ~~ This Agree.ent and any of tts terms or provisions, a,s veil as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the lames of the state of Texas, The venue of an dis ate or y p matter arising under this Agreement shall ire in Denton bounty. vI. ~'~~RABILIT' In the event that any portion of this Agreement shall be found to be contrary to lam, it is tine intent .~~N~~ and AUNTY that the rem~ing portions shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent passible. v~~, AUTI~~IT~ The undersigned officer andlor agents of are the properly authorized officials and have the necessary authority tv execute this Areernent an behalf of A~ENY and ~U1~TY. E~U'TED ~n tnpllcate or7.lnal, this the ,~ day of _ 2~~7. ~~~~~: D~~.tan QUnty~ ~'~~ ~ l ~ west I~icl~ory Denton, Texas 7~~1 ~~~~: 1ty Of Denton ~~~ ~. ~~~~~ Street Denton, Texas 7~~~ ~ ~~: ~Vlary Horn Denton bounty ,fudge Acting on behalf of and by the authority of Denton bounty Qn~.misioners aurt of Denton, Texas ATT~T: Bv: Denton County Clerk APP1~~vED A~ ~"~ F~RiVI: B'; Assistant District Attorney 207-2~~8 Interlocat Cooperation Agreement-Ambulance ~ervicesJ~entor~ - ~~: Name ~eor e ~. Cam h~1~. Title Citg ~anag~r Acting an behalf of and by the authority of the pity of Denton APPR~'~~D A T~ ~NTEI~T: ~~; Denton bounty Fire lVTarshal ~P~~~U~ AS T~~FO~: CITY ATT~~~1~Y CITY 0~ D~~TDN, TEA BY~ Page 6 of? A~DIT~R~ ~TY1~~~ATE ~ hereby certify that funds are available in the amount of accornpli~h and pay die obligation ofDenton bounty under this contract. .~an~e elks, Denton bounty Auditor to 2~~7-~~08 Interlocal vo~eration Ag~eernen#-Ambulance Service~IDentun - Page 7 0~? ~ ,} ! ~ ~~ ~~ ~' k f, . ~' ~; a ~~ b m z ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ T ~ 5 @ _~. ~~,~ AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Fire ACM: Fred Greene ~TIR.TF,CT Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute an Interlocal Fire Protection Agreement between the City of Denton and Denton County for fire protection services; and declaring an effective date. BACKGROUND The Interlocal Agreement for fire service between the City of Denton and Denton County provides fire protection services by the Denton Fire Department to the County areas previously served by the Mayhill-Cooper Creek Volunteer Fire Department and a small portion of the Lake Cities Fire District now adjacent to the newly annexed City property in the southwest portion of Teasely (FM 2181). In 2003, Denton County requested that the City of Denton provide fire protection to the designated area due to Mayhill-Cooper Creek's continuing lack of sufficient resources to provide a proper response to fire calls. The County also requested in 2004 that the City respond to a small area next to the new DISD high school on FM 2181 and Old Alton Road since the City of Denton's response time to the area was much quicker than Lake Cities Fire Department. This ongoing Interlocal Agreement is often delayed in the County's legal approval process, which also includes review by the Denton County Fire Chiefs Association as well as approval by the Commissioners Court as part of their budget process. After the City of Denton signs the Agreement, the County Commissioners take their official action. Even though the contract is usually approved after its starting date, the Agreement still remains effective from October 1, 2007 with no reductions in revenues. The Commissioners Court determines the total appropriation to pay for fire protection in the unincorporated County area each year and divides that amount by an estimated number of fire calls to arrive at a per fire reimbursement. Table 1 shows the five-year history of fire funding. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 County Funding $639,757.44 $639.757.80 $649,328.40 $783,684.90 $872,820.00 Formula Amount $362.88 per call $368.10 per call $368.10 per call $368.10 per call $390.00 per call Total Fire Calls 1,763 1,738 1,764 2,129 2,238 Denton Fire Calls 135 82 147 75 78 Denton Funding $48,988.80 $30,184.20 $54,110.70 $27,607.50 $30,420.00 Table 1 Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 OPTIONS Approve proposed ordinance or deny proposed ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed ordinance and agreement. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) On December 6, 2005, the City Council discussed the Fire Protection Agreement with Denton County and gave staff direction to continue the funding agreement with the County with annual discussion during the budget process. City staff presented a breakdown of the actual costs to provide fire services in the County and the City Council indicated its desire to provide services. Given that this is the third contract since that discussion, staff will present a comprehensive review of ongoing actual costs to deliver fire services to the County in its budget process for FY2008-09 and will seek Council's direction in regards to any future agreements with the County for fire protection. Currently, there is no negotiation between the City and County on the provisions of the contract since the Commissioners Court determines the annual contract amount. The previous County fire protection contract was approved by the City Council on December 12, 2006. FISCAL INFORMATION Denton County will pay the City $10,000 upon execution of the proposed agreement and reimburse the City for each fire call at the rate of $390.00 per fire call which is an increase from the $368.10 per call reimbursement used in the 2007 Agreement. The annual estimate for the reimbursement of fire calls is $30,420.00 based on an estimated 78 fire calls in the unincorporated County area. The total fire protection contract with the County is estimated to be $40,420, which is an increase from last year's $37,607.50 contracted amount. EXHIBITS Ordinance Agreement District Map Respectfully submitted: Ross Chadwick Fire Chief s:~ur ~ocumentslar~inat~eesl~?lfire protection agreement county.doc ODINANE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEA APP~OV AND AUTI~OR~INC THE CITY 1VIANAER TO EXECUTE AN IlVTERLOAL AM~ULANE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TIC CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON OLTI~TY FOR FnE ~'ROTECTION SERVICES; AND DEC~ARIN AN EFFECTIVE DATE. TFIE OUNCI~, OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City Cou~.ci~ of the City of Denton hereby approves an Agreement between the City of Denton ar~d Denton County for fire protection services, copy of v~hich ~s attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The City Manager, or his designee, i hereby authari~ed to execute this Agreement on behalf of the City. SECTION ~. This Ordinance shall became effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ~a0~. PERRY R. McNEILI~, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER SALTERS, CITY SECRETA~.Y BY. APPROVED ~ TO LEGAL FORM. EDWIN M. SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY ~~ BY~ THE COUNTY OF DENTON § § CITY OF DENTON STATE OF TEXAS § INTERLI~CAL ~~OFER,A.TI~~ AREEMEIVT FIRE PR~TETII~~ EI~vIE THIS AC~RE~MEI~T i made. and entered into this ~ day of ,.., , 207, by and between Denton County, a political ubd~ion of the State of Texas, hereina~er referred to as "C~~~.J~TY'~ and the City of Denton, a municipal corporation, located in Denton County, Teas, hereinafter referred to as "AEN~~," H~A, ~DUNTY is a duly organized political subdivision of the State of Texas engaged in the administration of county government and related services for the benefit of the citizens of Denton County; and H~I~EAS, AEIVY ~s a n~unlc1pal cvrporat~on, duly organized and operating under the laves of the State of Texas and is engaged in the provision of fire protection services and related services for the benefit of the citizens of the City of Denton; and H~REAS, A~E~~ is the ov~ner anal operator of certain hre protection vehicles and other equipment designed for the extinguishing of fire and prevention of damage to property and injury to persons from frre and has in its employ trained personnel phase duties are rclated to the use of such vehicles and equipment; and H~REAS, C~~JN~T' and ~AE~Y rriutually desire to be subject to and contract pursuant to the provisions of Cxoverrunent Code, Chapter 79 ~, the ~nterlocal Cooperation Act, and Chapter 352 of the Local C~overnm.ent Code, N~~, THEREFORE, ~DUNTY and AEA, for the mutual promises, covenants, ~.greements and consideration stated herein, agree as follows; I, TERM The term of this ,Agreement shall be for the. period of ~ctaber 1, 2~~7 to and through September 3~, 2~~~. IT. The services to be rendered in accordance v~ith this Agreement by AEN~ are the fire protection services normally rendered by AENI~~ to citizens of Denton but v~hich services ~viil no~v be extended to all citizens of AUNTY residing in the unincvrparated areas of 2~~7 - 2~~0$ In~eriocal Cooperation Agreement -Fire Protection ~erviceslD~nt~n ~ Page ~ ~~ 6 ~i~NTY within the operating territory or jurisdiction of A~ENY agreed to by DENY and COUNTY in this Agreement and as set forth. in Exhibit A. These services are rendered in consideration of the basic funding and the separate per call fee set forth in this Agreement; for the co~nman good and benefit; and to serve the public convenience and necessity of the citizens of ~i~NTY who are not otherwise protected with respect to fire prevention, extinguishment, safety, and rescue services The services to be rendered are as follows: ~. AGENCY shall n~a1~e available and provide emergency fire prevention, extir~guishrnent, safety and rescue services within the agreed ar specified territory or jurisdiction of the AGENCY; ~. AGENCY shall respond to requests for fire protection services made within the portran of the AUNTY designated as "Denton." as set out ~n Exhibit ~'A." attached hereto and incorporated by reference. C~T~NTY agrees that, in the event a fire in the AENC`Y's unincorporated designated area which AGENCY considers to be of incendiary nature and upon request by AENY, the bounty Fire Marshal w111 dispatch investigation personnel to the fire scene within a response time sufficient to legally n~ai~tain and protect all evidence of Bald fire and will conduct all appropriate investigation and assist in the prosecution of any case of arson. AGENCY shall not be responsible for investigations of suspected incendiary fires in the unincorporated areas, but shall cooperate with the bounty Fire Marshal in immediately relating all pertinent information possible to the investigators}. D. C~LJNT'Y agrees that the Jaunty Fire Marshal rrray assist in the conduct of appropriate investigations of a fire which AGENCY considers to be of incendiary nature in the A~ENCY's incorporated designated area upon request by AENY. E. AGENCY shall submit monthly statements on the Texas Fire Incident departing system's standardized farms to the Denton bounty Fire Marshal, 9~~0 Teasley Dane, Denton, Texas 7~Z 1 ~-4~ 1 ~. This farm will serve as the billing statement to ~~~TNTY far reimbursement of calls made in the unincorporated designated area. The Denton bounty Fire 1Vlarhal shall provide the farms upon request from .ENY. F. AGENCY, in the performance of its duties and responsibilities under this Agreement, shall have the responsibility, within the sole discretion of the officers and employees of AGENCY except as otherwise determined by the Denton Jaunty Fire ll~arshal, to determine priorities in the dispatching and use of AGENCY equipment anal personnels and the judgment of any such officer or employee as to any such matter shall be the final deterininatian. 2107 - ~~08 Interloc~l ~ooperati~n Agreement -Fire Protection ServiceslDent~n - Page 2 of 6 III. L~A~N ~FFI~ER ~~]NTY shall designate the bounty Judge to act on behalf of AUNTY and to serve as "liaison officer" between AUNTY and AEN~Y, The bounty Judge or her designated substitute shall devote sufficient time and attention to this Agreement to insure the performance of all duties and obligations of BOUNTY and provide supervision of ~UNTY's employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors andlor laborers engaged in the performance of this Agreement four the nriutual benefit of BOUNTY and AGENCY. IY. PERFORMANCE F ER.vICE AGENCY shall devote sufficient tune anal attention to insure the performance of all duties and obligations of AGENCY under this Agreement and shall provide immediate and direct supervision of the AGENCY employees, agents, contractors, sub-contractors andlor laborers engaged in the performance of this Agreerrlent for the mutual benefit of AOENC'Y and COUNTY. ~. ~YP~AT~HN CUUNTY agrees to pay to AGENCY for the full performance of services as provided in this Agreement the sum of TEN THOUSAND AND NG~1~4TH DOLLARS ~1~,00~.0~}, payable upon execution of this Agreement, and the further sum of THREE HUNDRED NINETY AND N~ DOLLARS ~~~0.~0~ per fire call in the designated unincorporated areas of COUNT" from ctcber 1, 2007 to epte.ber 30, 2005. COUNTY anticipates AGENCY to run app~ro~i~nately 7S fire calls for total funding of ~~,~4~0,4U for fire calls. The total of all payments by COUNTY tv AGENCY pursuant to this Agreement is estimated to be 4D,4Z4,~~, COUNTY will make no payment to AOENGY far service provided outside the agreed service district whether by mutual aid Agreement or otherwise. AOENY understands and agrees that payment by the COUNTY to AGENCY shall be made in accordance with the normal and customary processes and business procedures of COUNTY and conformance with applicable state law. VI. ~NANL4L RECORDS AGENCY agrees to make available its financial records for audit andlor review as may requested ar required by 'G~JNTY, ~~07 - ~ODB Interlocal ~~operataon Agreement -Fire Protection ~errriceslDenton - Page ~ of 6 VII. EPI~N~IBIL~TY ~F ~~NTY C~~NTY, to the extent allowed by lwx shall be responsible for the acts, negligence, andlar omissions of all affrcers, ernplo~ees, ar~d agents of ~~UNTY while engaged in the performance ofthis A.reen~ent. .VIII. ~P~NIBILITY ~F AEI~Y A~~~, to the extent allowed by law, shall be responsible far the acts, negligence, andlar o.issions of all officers, employees, and agents of AEN~Y while engaging in the perfannance of this Agreement. I. A,F~LI~ABLL LAw DUTY and AEA understand and agree that liability under this contract is governed by V.T.C,A. C~avernment Cade Chapter 79l and V.T.C.A. Local averr~rnent Code Chapter ~ 52. Thrs Agreement ~ made ~n cante~nplatlan of the appllcabil~ty of these laws to the Agreement. I~.safar as legally possible ~~UNTY and .~ENCY agree to be hound by the above mentioned statutes as they exist a of the d#e of this Agreement. FAULT. In the event of any default in any of the covenants herein contained, this Agreement ~.~ be forfeited and terminated at either party's discretion if such default continues for a period often ~ t ~~ days after notice to the other party in ~vrz.ting of such default and intention to declare this Agreement terminated. Unless the default is cured as aforesaid, this Agreerr~ent shall terminate as if that were the day originally fixed herein far the expiration of the Agreement. ~I. TFIII~ATIN This Agreement naay be terminated any time, by either party giving sixty ~~~~ days advance v~ritten notice to the other party. In the event of such termination by either party, A~1~Y shall be carr~pensated pro rata for all services performed to terrninatian date, together with reimbursable expenses then due and as authari~ed by this Agreement. In the event of such termination, should AT~NY be overcompensated an a pro rata basis for all services perfanned to ter~ninatian date, andlar be overcompensated reimbursable expenses as authorised by~ this ,Agreement, D~TNT~ ha1~ be reimbursed pro rata far all such o~ercompena~t~on. Acceptnoe X047 - 2~~8 Int~rlocal Cooperation Agreement -Fire ~rotectian erv~ceslDentor~ - Fade 4 ~f 6 of such reimbursement shall not constitute a waiver of any claim that nay otherwise arise out of this Agreerent. III. ~~yENNTA~ INIUNIT~ The feat that ~~UNTY and A~~CY accept certain responsibilities relating to the rendition Qf f ire ~retectian services under this Agreement as ~, paxt of their ~espanslbili fay providing protection far the public health makes it in~pcrative that the performance of these vital services be recognised as a governmental function and that the doctrine of governmental immunity shall be and it is hereby invoked to the extent passible under the law, Neither AGE~~ nor [~UNT~ waives nor shall be deemed hereby to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising from the exercise of goven~ent pDV~ers and fllnatlQns. ~~, E~TII AI~~~1T~ This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between AEN and ~UT~ and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations andlor Agreements, ether written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both AENC'~ and ~~UIVTY. HIV, LAw ~~" ~NTRA~T This Agreement anct any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the state of Texas. The venue of any dispute or matter arlsing under this Agreement shall lie 1n IJentan bounty. ~. EVERA.BILITY In the event that any portion of this Agreement shall be found to be contrary to law, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portia~.s shall remain valid and in full force and effect to the extent possible. I. AUTH[]IT~ The undersigned officer andlar agents of the parties hereto are the properly authari~ed officials and have the necessary authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the parties 200 - 2U~8 Ir~terlocal Cooperation Agreement - dire protection serviceslllenton - Page 5 of ~ hereto, and each party hereb~r certifies to the other that any. necessary resolutions extending paid authority have been duly passed and are nom in full force and effect. II. ERV.[E AREA Acceptance of this Agreement constitutes approval of the service area set out in attached exhibit "A'" EEC~TE~ in triplicate originals, this the C~H~'TY - Dentvn.County, Texas I 1 ~ Vest Hickory Denton, Texas 7~~a 1 By Mary Horn Denton County Judge .Acting on behalf Qf and~by the authority o f ~ enton County Ca~nlssioners Court of Denton County, Texas. ATTEST; BY: Denton County Clerk A~~R~~ED ~. TG "~~: ~~. .~en~on ~oun~y r ire ars~a~~ ~F~~~~~D A T~ ~0~l~. ~ QTY ATT~R~ ~Y - ---~ - CfTY ~F ~ENTO~, TEA Assistant Dlstnct Attorney ~` ~~; AIJDIT~R' ERTIFIA ~ hereby certify that funds are available in the amount of accornplish and pay the obligation of Denton County under this contract. Jamey wells, Denton County Auditor day of AGENCY City ofDentan ~~~ E. Hickory t, Denton, Texas 7~~1 By Name George ~am~bell _ City Manager Acting on behalf of anal by the authority of e City ofDentan A~~ROED A T~ ~ONEI~T; ~~: ~aa7. to 2~~7 - 205 Interlocal Cooperation Agreaner~t -Fire Protection ~ervicesfDenton - Page b ofd ~~~~ ~~; ~~~~. ,~ } ~~~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ o~ ~ ~- m .. ~,.~~ ~ ~~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ a ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ :. .. . *+ ~~ . D ~rt ~r 0: . ~ ~ ' ~' { Fi ., ~ !, ~~ 1 f I ~! ~ f ~' ~ I .~ I _! r 1 ~ ,~ 1 ~ L I ! - F I --'i I 1 ~ ~; ~ - ~^ rY. I "~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ } ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ y r ~~ ~ ~ _ '~ ~~ .x ' ~. _ ;;~ .~ . ~ .. f, ~_ ~Y~~ r F.'s~;:'Y~ "~/`~~',~^~,-' ,'T.'~.~,xti" :M4 .1. ~ ' t 7j`y' ..~'{`.yy '~ ~ ~" r },<~ :. r.~.~, t .___ _ .,.. -.,.rr--_-_,..., ' r 'ab°y. I'.~y;.' ~'.ti ~' p~~ ~ : ? r ~: ~:~ ~ti' .T~' . y <w'~ ~'F ~'~ i ' ' '~ , °~ r_ ul~~' ~ %"y ~:.w.i. `r~r' ~'}"~`~• ,' p ;'~' ~ .~ : i '~ ~ 4:X~~ ~ ~ . -r f v,c f ; yak ;'3~~pr` ~ rSr ri t _~ ~ ~ .iiA.)~{~~gr!~''~ ., ~:n >': ~~; ,~:~lafd~+.` ~ t; YG^';~~i','~.'.. ~~ ~'~i~6F 4;. ;yg "~~'y~F~s'rF., r-~ .:}„rv~'a°I .7' y~'~ ` ^~ ' ~~ ~ ~ , .. . r , ~`~ , ,`<e;~ r~~,,.~ "~ - •..~' ?ti.~ ~- :. . r~~ '~`, ~~..'vj" _ '. ~:~L ~~~i+"'. 4~Y5~~.~" ..f,}" "off^.~~s:'..'~ fr„~„KS--w'~'c. 5 d!„~. . ,. A;.ro.: _.N .. , ,~t~_v~ " Y i -x I V~ ~' .~ . . ~~,,.1, ~.> , aN .. r.~y~ r1 ,;.. ',L-,: ~"7rr .sltl,o ..: ~'x"w~ :I/r;..xw~;~:,'~ f J:nS?~ s iygr Ip li9 ~ iae ~' •~ F .:r,~' , In F Y . .~ ~ ~ l:. :yy..Y .~~ ~ Y ~'~ri~.. yxf~,: ~.:1..~w.sY~Y-: 7+ ~r, ,~ ~r.{:C.~ "' .F~ ..Y~~' ~: m, r} ,l..rN<.fi.>~ ~Y., ~~'~!r4~~~i~:. ~.}}: ', r, r ~ i ~' .:~ .Y. Y' . a'~' i.i I~ .. .r ~i. ~:'4+'. ~'~'~' ` ~' ~' `~ M` . l~,. r: V S R. ~~r•` k •'x,:+t:. ~:. r:i~ ~~: :~.t<~~"•:., f ""w r : ', ti rf'. ~ <i~;5'~: "i yf~h ~,~f: ~'~~~ rvrh f.T .rj.. rr}j~.: ry~f,i ~ ;;~~,.. ~lZ.~::ry +s~ riry-G._,-ry: :•. ~ ~ :~l;a" A "Y': rJ,l ~~. .A'..~ 2.` .:~.11~.::: h.. _i~ S 4 6 I.:YNrv r~' d. •. ' ' [~L'`~ `4+,. ~ ;: '1~ r~' : v !7`' ~f;', ~~'..:. y`+.... ~~4 }}~"'r.. .~1 ?N' ~ ~:4-•' ~ d'r. ryyy 3 • - +:! ~:f ~j . ' ^: My .~,~~{6Ji.i' v ! .w ~ ~Cs .'~' ~!'h '~~~. i E Y ~`''~; ~ ffr~ ! ''~4 r ;'~ ~ ~ '.~~'%.:.1 /r .a} R f.. __ - .~;'s:::` 8~rf ~ '.; r.:q~r:~ + +~~ .,. ,r .r r ~y` ):l~'~.i' /~ ~~ >i '~ J' ~ ` y~~.. r ~~ ~; o- Ly ~~ j . y! - ~~}!~ iY: ~K . ;:ar , . .:f , ~ ~ ~~,;S i'i'.. ~~,eti ~fi} ,,~~1'11°1::~~ PY+S' Y.r:'r` ~~,~Y'f lf.i x~~~~i :1G:: F,l..SA .~.'~4. N "L .: _g f.:.l~l ':4'Y'9{.,-YFx•1.-.. F-Lr::, ..,u .r .4r , ti i: .~a~.~. ..~nT'': -'r. a'.~~:. :oar: '~'y'~': ~;~~:~:;~~~~ .~' .:.. v,r+.r: r:. ~~Y~'. ,. .' :. w.- .w~_.1...:.. ~.~:.~.~~ w x rw+ v!: 19f !'S r C,. fir ~4 ... ... 4.~~'ti -5. A:~, `:~ ~::,r- n y ' ,y~_, .r~~:~' ~0 ~ L ~.. 1R ..:. . . ~ ~; ~ . : ..~~;.:::~ :> .} ~ s .. . ~~' i ~ ~~ : } .. .. _ f . , '. ~ I ~ . . , ,...;,: . ::,~ 'yi', .... ~ '.n . ~: ,:..... . { 5 ' .. ' . ~~~r'' ~'f ~' ,. 5'" ,rM '~f,''~~'. ~ ~ i ~ 1 :: . . e. :: .~ ~ t ' ~. +r3" ' 'i,f''''V r~'. " ~ ' ~ ',5 ,. 'r ; r'~ .. r . „°~ ' ' r ~ N ~ 1 ~ ! ' ~-~-rte... ' ,~~f~ `.:I ~ ''[i r ~ I _y ~ .. r ;. , . Cf,~ ~ ' ' . I ~~ ~ '. ~~. ~~Y . r~ ~~ . .. :,;. :.. :f: . ,, , ::,. , . I .~ AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Economic Development CM: Geor e C. Cam bell ~' g p ~t JR JF,C'T Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas, and the Denton Chamber of Commerce; and providing an effective date. BACKGROUND The City Council and the Denton Chamber of Commerce first entered into an economic development partnership agreement in 1986. Over the years, many changes have been made to the contract. Attached is a chart detailing the changes made in the contract and funding each year. Although the contract provides for an automatic renewal each year, providing the Council continues to fund the program, the contract wording is not clear on the amount to be funded each year. The most recent amendment in 2004 identified $177,000 plus an additional $84,000 for Image and Marketing. In order to clearly record and allocate funding for the Denton Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Office each year, staff will begin submitting annual contracts during the budget process for City Council approval. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW The Economic Development Partnership Board reviewed the budget and work plan for the 2007-08 fiscal year and recommended approval of the $240,000 budget at their June 1 1, 2007 meeting. The Board approved changing the contract to clarify funding allocation at their November 19, 2007 meeting. FISCAL INFORMATION A total of $240,000 was allocated to the Denton Chamber of Commerce for the 2007-08 fiscal year. A payment of $177,000 has been issued, leaving a balance of $63,000. EXHIBITS History of Partnership Ordinance Denton Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Agreement Respectfully submitted: ,- ~ ,, •n ( ti r}-r/ _ tit. i r •5 ti i ~ F ~I~1 ~ :r. + I. M1 Linda Ratliff, Director Economic Development Department -1- Z Z a 2 W Z Q Z W 0 J W W U 0 0 U W 0 0 2 00 ~ I~ N ('~ C~ ln ~ C4 O O f~ C4 N ~ O N I` I` 00 c~ O O N ~ 0 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I` I~ I` O ~ N O ~ ~ ~ C~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ Cfl O C~ 00 C4 C4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O f` 00 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N _ ~ O C~ ~ ~ 00 ~ f~ ~ 00 ~ I` N ('~ c~ ~ ~ C~ O O O O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ O ~ N ~ I` ~ I` ~ 00 f~ (~ I` O I` O O ~ I~ O O In I` ._~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i o ~i ~i o m oo ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ O C4 00 00 00 ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ `er ~ ~m ~ °~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ag ~ o ~O r o N o +~ ° ~ o ~~~ o~ o ~ N ~c~ ~~ ~~~ O ° O o~i a~~~ o~ ~i O ~~ ~ ~ x ~ N~~ In ~+ N ~ ~ > O N ~ t6 0 O N U > ~_ N• ~ +~ ~ ~ N ~~ ° ~~~ N~ ~~ • ~ ~~ N UNU ~~N ~~ ~ 0~ UNL p'~0 ~ `~N °N ~N cn o -0~ •~+~ U~N N~ ~ O N~ - o a~N - ~z ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ o~ ~o~ a~ ~ o~~ ~ o~ ~~ ~~ N L O S ~ O C ~~~ ~ O N ~ U N ~ +~ ~ to ~= ~ L.L ~ L.L W ~ ~ U ~ ~ N L UU c ~~() L ~ n, ta Q~ ~ ~ t6 ~ ~ W~N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ 1~ ~ N ~ ~ ' ^ VJ ~ n ` p ~..~ /~ ~ ~ U i.i '^ rR ~.I 11J ~ ~ I ~ ~ ° ~ OJ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ U~~ ~ ~~ Q U N Q N° z `11^~J +, N N \~ NJ O N E UL O~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ t6 N ~ ~ o ~ O ~ ~ 00 ~' 00 o U ~ V~ ~ ~ }' O U~ ~ ' 0 O L~ ~ ' U ~~ ~~ N W U ~ ~n N W~ n n,, ~ W W W ~ ~+~ W t6 ~ ~ 0 W N ~ ~ Q III ~ ~ ° Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a-- ~ ~ ~ / 1 ~ p •~ ~ ~ ~~ ta ~ ~0 ~~~ ~ ° ~N 0~ ~°L ~o / ~ ~NU~ ~~N ~~ / ~ ~U ~ Q ~~ ~ oN Q ~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ O ° Q N~ °-oZ Q ° Q~ O ° QW ~, . U n, ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ L N ~ ~ ~ p ~ ^, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+-+~ n' ~ ~ ^, n' ~ ~ ~ n, ~ ~ N ~~ • ~~ W ~ 0 L N m N W W U m N ~ m N~ N m o 3~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ v~ ,Uv ~ v 3~ ~ ca p ~ ~~~ ~ o~~a~ N ~~ o ~ ~ op~~ o~o ooc~ ~ c~V ~ o ~ OV ~ ~ Z ~ ~ z NW~ L " c~~U ~~U ~ ~ O O v ~ ~ 3~ ~ O N ~ ~ N N N ~ ~ N U N +, ~ N ~W N N O +~ •~~ ~ +, 0 W ~ +~ +, ~ ~~ O U U~ , ~ . Z~ O N 0 0 0 •- - N O S- 0 O }, N 0 O 0 }, 0 0' 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ to to (~ ~ O ~ ~ p ~ O ~ ~~ ~+ ~ ~ O °U ~ ~, _ ~ ~ N ~ ON ~ ~ U s U ~ U ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ O N ~O ~ 0 0 ~ N ~~ ~ ° ~ N ~~ ~ ~ }' N N ~ _ ~ ~ L ~,•~ 0 ~ ~ O 00 U O Z O Z 0 Z ~ ~•~ ~~~ ~ U ~ ~ 0 N ~ U ~ 0 ~ U ~ ~,~ ~ ~ Q LL 00_Q LL ff}~ Q b } ~ t6 Q ~ Q QQ~ LL L ~ I` 00 O O ~ N c~ ~ ~ C4 I~ 00 0 - ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O v C4 I` 00 0 0 ~ N c~ ~ ~ C4 I~ 00 y 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ._ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M ~ ~ O ° 0 0 O O O o 0 0 o o c~ oo ao a~ o o 0 0 0 0 *~ ~ oo ao M ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ c~ c~ ~ ~ ~ c~ c~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N 00 00 I` O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ M C4 C4 0 0 O O ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 O O O O 3 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 00 ~ ~ 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 O O ~ ~ O C4 C4 0 0 O O ~~ ~ ~ O W O O O O O '- ~ ~ ~ ~ W O N O O O +~ 3 00 00 00 00 00 C'0 I~ 00 C4 ~~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ L O } -, O p 0 0 '~ ~ N ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ +~ ~ NCO N >~ o~ ~~o ~~~ p O ~~ O p O O~•- W ~••+ ~ L ~--~ , u ~ Ota0 O O~N ~~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ N U N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ i N N ~ O 0 U ~ ~ ~ O to 0 ~ ~ N p ~- V V ~ ~ ~ O O QO ~ ~ Ot6 O ~ Q ~ NO- +~N Q O~~ O t6},~ 0 ~ ,~ ~ ~~ O O N to c~ 0 U~ O ~ ~ O ~, ~L _ O Q) O pp UN~ ~ L ~ N+, ~ ~ •N p N N L O 0'- ~ ~ (~ N ~ U O ~ U S N ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ N 0 ~ ~~~~ ~~~ 0 ~ ~ 0 O~O ~ Nta3v N~~ U ~ ca ~ c~ ~~0 ~ ~ ~O~0 ~`~N ,~ ~ ._ °~ ° ~ N ~ O ~ ~ N ~ c~ ~ ~ ; a~ a~ O ~p~ .~ ~ ~ ~ a~ e ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ N ~ ~ ta N N }'~ ~~ ~ N ~0~ ~ N ~~ p ~ ~ p 00 ~~~ ~ 0 f~ ~ to ~ 00 ~ 0 • • 0 O Q ~ N t~ N t~ ~ ~ ~'t6 ~ p p~ N~ p~ O ~U ~_ ~ ~ Q ~ N~OO N N ~ ~ U ~ 0 ~ 0 U ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ D L LL~ O Z ~ ~ 0 Z N~ t6 (n c~U ~ ~} ~~ ~ N ~U c~~ ~ N ~ ~,W L ~ O ~ N c~ ~ 0 0 f` o0 ~ O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O ~ N M ~ 0 C4 f~ N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N :lour Documentslardi~a~ces1071Chamber 0?-~~,doc DRDI~IANE N~. AN ~RDINANE A~P~OVIN AN AREEIVIENT BETWEEN THE CITY ~F DENTIN, TE~A~ AND THE DENTIN HAEER ~~ ~NIlI~I~E; AND P~.~~TIDINC~ AN E~`~ETE DATE. wHER.EA, the pity council of the pity of Denton deems it ~ in the public interest and serves a municipal and public purpose to enter rota an agreement with the Denton hatnber of onnnerce far the purpose of providing far a program to promote economic development through the ~a~nt effort of the parties hereto; N0", THEREFORE; THE ~~UNII1 F THE CITY ~F DENTIN HEREBY ORDAIN: ETI~N 1 ~ 1ty aunc~l finds that the Agreement between the ~1ty of Denton and the Denton harnber of Commerce serves a valid municipal and public purpose and is in the public lrtterest. ETI~N ~. The Agreement between the City of Denton and the Denton Chamber of Commerce attached hereto and rriade a part hereof by reference the "Agreement"} is hereby approved. The Il~ayar, ar in his absence, the ayar pro Tem, is hereby authari~ed to execute the Agreement on behalf of the pity of Denton. The City 1Vlanager is hereby authorised to carry out the City's rights and duties under the Agreement including authorisation far the expenditure of funds provided for in the Agreement ECTY~N ~, This ordinance shall became effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PAED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2~OS. PERRY ~. cNEILL, AY~~ ATTEST: JENNIFER ALTER, CITY SECRETARY ~Y~; APPROVED A T~ LEGAL FDRNI: EDP M, SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY B~': s:lour d~cumert~lcnntracts1~71ec~nomic dev prog ag~.d~c Et~DND1VIIC DEV~LOPNIENT ~~Dt~RA A~RE~NIENT BETE~N T~ CITY D~ DENTIN AND TI~~ D~NTON ~B~ ~F t~DMMEI~E This Agreement is nude between the pity of Denton, Texas, ~"City} and the Denton Chamber of Commerce ~"Chamber"~ for the purpose of providing far a pragratn to promote econa~ic development through the point effort of the parties hereto, ~vha 1n con~dera#~an of their mutual promises, agree as follows. ~. t~hamher ~ff~ce of Econvmi~c Development ~~`Dffice"}. During the term of this Agreement, the Chamber shall maintain an ~ff~ce of Economic Development managed by the dice president of ~canomic Develapme.t, ~vho shall perform the duties of the ofce~ ~. Duties of the Uf~ice. The Chamber of Commerce shall; a. Develop and maintain positive relationships with key economic development allies, including but not limited ta, private sector investors, the Governor's office of ~conon~ic Develapm.ent, Greater Da~~as Chamber of commerce, and national, regional and local real estate brokers and land developers. b. lVlaintain memberships and involvement in econan~ic develaprnent organi~a~ians, such as the International Economic Development Council and Teas ~canoic Development Council. c. Develop and produce marketing materials to promote Denton, including but not limited± ta, placement of advertising 1n trade publicat1ons, and the development and maintenance of ~rebsites ~DentonED~.cam, Dentonites~com and DentonD.org}, d. ~.ecruit prospective businesses through attendance at target market trade shows and events e. Serve as paint of contact far businesses interested i~ locating in Denton. f. work closely with the City of Denton office of Economic Development e development of programs and policies. s;lour ~~cumentslcon#~cts1471e~~nomic rev prog agr.~oc . Prepare and obtain approval of the annual ~vo;rk plan and budget from the Economic Development Partnerslup hoard and provide the Board with monthly activity reports. support services end Funding, The han~ber shall provide the office space, equip.ent and support staff necessary to the operations of the office of Economic Development. Far the fiscal year 0~7-OS, the ~harnber shall solicit and contribute private sector funds in the amount of ~ 87,1 7, and the pity shall provide funding in the arnaunt of $~4~,U0~; $50,~~~ from the general Fund and ~ 1 U,~00 from the Utilities Fund. The balance of any unused pity funds shall ~e returned tv the pity at the end of the fiscal year. Any funds provided by the pity pursuant to this Agreement shall be retained in an account separate and segregated from the ha~nber's general operating fiu~d and shall only be used for the purpose provided far in this Agreement. The chamber and the ~ff~ce shall keep current and accurate records of all funds received and expended, ~rhich shall be subject to inspection and audit by the pity at all reasonable times. All such financial records shall be subject of the Teas Public Information Act, Tex. Gov't fade h. 55~. ~~~~' 4, status of office, The office of Econcn~ic Develaprrrent sha11 be under the direct supervision and control of the hanaber and all personnel of the office shall be considered employees ar agents of the ha~nber. The harriber shall be responsible for the processing of all benefits ar payment Hof liabilities of such ernplayees ar agents, including the v~ithhalding ar payment of personal income or social security taxes, as provided by applicable lam, and the payment of worker's compensation premiurns. The han~ber shall maintain policies of insurance in the n~inin~~tn amounts required by law to protect against liabll~ty ans~n from the operation of any vehic~~es used by employees of the office and the Cha~i}er agrees to defend against, and indemnify and hold the pity, its elected officials, officers, agents, employees and representatives harmless from any claim arising from any negligent act of such employees. . Tenn of Agreement. This Agreement sha11 be effective for a tern of one ~ 1 } year from the execution hereof. Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the other Page ~ s:lour documentslcont~actsl~7~econorr3ic rev prig agr.~oc thirty ~3~} days advance notice, in which case any une~~ended funds ~ra~ided ~y the pity shah he returned to the pity. ~UT~r~ this the day ~f , 205. . TI'S 0~ ~~NT~N PERRY R. cNEIL~, .A~~R ,~TTET: JENNrFE~ ALTER, CITY EITAR~Y B~; ~PPR~VED A T~ LEGAL F~; ERIN M. NYDER, QTY ATTORNEY BY: DENTIN ~HAB~R ~F ~1VIlV~RE Page 3 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CM/DCM/ACM: George C. Campbell, City Manager SIIR,TF,CT: Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing an agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and Opening Doors Immigration Services for provision of assistance to victims of domestic violence; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. BACKGROUND: This agreement allows for the total expenditure of $500 from Council Member Jack Thomson's Council Contingency Fund. Key provisions of the agreement include: ^ Funds shall be used by the Opening Doors Immigration Services to assist immigrant households where one or more of the household members have been the victim(s) of domestic violence. Use of funds may include costs of the program and training. ^ In addition to other reporting requirements, documentation in the form of cancelled checks and/or corresponding receipts specifically detailing expenditure of funds for the purpose provided is required for reimbursement from these designated funds. FISCAL INFORMATION Funding for the contract will come from respective Council contingency fund accounts. Respectfully submitted: r~ ~ ti y r ...z a =~ _ ~i . George C. Campbell City Manager Prepared by: Linda Holley Executive Assistant s:lour docurnent~lordinar~ce~1~81opening doors ord 20~S.~oc ORDnVANE NO, AN ~RDTNANE OF THE CITY OF DENTON A~JTHORI~IlV~ AN A~REEl1~ENT ~ETwEEN THE OTI'Y OF DENTON, TEA AND OPEN~C DOORS Il~.I~II~rRATION ERIOE FOR PRO~tION OF AITANOE TO ~IOTIII~i OF DOIVIETI VIOLENCE; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUND; AND PRO~DINC FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. wHEREA, the Opening Doors Im~nigra~an Services, a Texas non-profit corporation, the "Organization='s provides assistance to irnnligrant households ~ the C1ty of Denton where one or more residents have been the vic#im~~ of domestic violence the "Program."~; and wHEREA., the Organization and the City of Denton desire to enter into an. agreement to provide for the continuance ofthe Pragra~ri which a~green~ent is substantially in the same faun as the agreement attached hereto and .de a part hereof by reference the "Agreement"}; and wI~REA, the City Council afthe pity of Denton hereby finds that the Agreement between the pity and the Organization attached hereto and made a. part hereofby reference serve a municipal and public purpose and the Agreement is in the public interest; NOS, THEREFORE, THE COUNCII~ OF THE CIfiY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAIl~; ECT~ON 1. The findrngs set forth ~n the preamble of this ard~nance are incorporated by reference into the body of this ardlnance as if fii11y set Earth herein. SECTION Z. The City 1Vlanager, or his designee, is hereby authorised to execute the Agreement and to carry out the duties and responsibilities of the pity under the Public Service Agreement, including the expenditure of funds as provided in the Public Agreement. SE~T~ON 3. This ard~nance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , ~D~S, PERRY R.. cNEILL,IVIAYOR ATTEST; JENN~'E~ A~TE~, QTY E~ETAI~~ B~: ~PPR~~ED A~ T EDP 1VI. SAD ~~• Page ~ ~~ r '~ ~{ o.lcontingency fundslcit~ councill~y 2~~?-20081jaok thomsanlope~ing doorslopeni~g dogs a~eement 20~~.doc ~~vIE A~EEIE~IT ~Tw~~1 TT~E ITS ~F DETUN, TEA A.I~D O~ENIN D~~R IM~I~RATY~N ESE This Agreement is hereby entered into by and between the City afDentan, Teas, Home .ule Municipal ~orparation,hereinafter referred to as ~,ity", and open boars Iig~atian Services, a Teas Non-profit arparation, hereinafter referred to as "~enin~ boars Immigration Services": wHEE.A, pity has determined that the proposal far services merits assistance and can provide needed services to citizens of City and has provided funds in its budget far the purpose of paying for contractual services; and wHEREA, this Agreement serves a valid municipal and public purpose and is in the public interest; NOw, THEFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows; I. S~OP~ OF SER~~E Opening boars miratian Services shall in a satisfactory and proper manner perform the fallowing tasl~s, for which the n~anies provided by pity maybe used: The funds being provided shall be used by Opening Doan Immigration Services to assist immigrant households where ane ar mare of the household members. have been the victin~~s} of domestic violence. Use of funds may include operating costs of the program and training. II. OBLIGATIONS OF OPENING DOOMS IIVIIC~~ATION ERVI~S In cans~deration ofthe receipt affunds from ~1ty, Opening boars ~~nig~ation Services agrees to the following terms and conditions: A. Five Hundred Dollars and null Da ~SaO.aa} sha11 be paid to Opening Doors Immigration Services by ~it~to be ~u~~~~zed far the purposes .set firth ~. ~i~cl~~..:..:- ~~ . Opening Daars ~igrtton Services will maintain adequate records to establish that the pity funds are used far the purposes authorized by this Agreement. . Opening Doors Immigration Services will permit authorized ocials ofity to review its books at any time. D. Upon request, Opening boars Immlgrat~on Services will provide to ~~ its B Laws and y of its rules and regulations that nay be relevant to this Agreerr~ent. E. Opening Doors Immigration Services will not enter into any contracts that would encumber pity funds far a period that would extend beyond the term of this Agreement. F. Opening Doors Immigration Services w111 appoint a representative who X11 be available to meet with pity officials when requested. . Opening Doors Immigration Services will submit to pity copies of year-end audited financial statements. III. TIDE OF PERFORII~ANE The services funded by pity shall be undertaken and completed by Orgar~i~ation within the fallowing time frame; The term afthis A.green~ent shall earnmence an tl~e effective date and terminate September 30, ~~08, unless the contract i sooner terminated under Section ~'II ""Suspension or Termination". iV. PARENTS A. PAYMENTS TO OPENING DOORS INi~ZRATI~N S~~vICE. its shall pay to Opening Doors ~migratian Services the sure specified in Article II after the effective date of this Agreerr~ent. B. Exc~~s PAYMENT. Opening I)aors Im~i.gratian Services shall refund to pity within ten ~ 10}working days of pity"~ request, any sung of money which has been paid by pity and which pity at any time thereafter determines; i } has resulted in av~rpay~ment to Opening Doan ~m~nigration Services; ar 2} has not been spent strictly in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; ar } is not supported by adequate documentation to fully justify the expenditure. ~. E~Af,~JATION Opening Doors Immigration Services agrees to participate in a~n implementation and rria~nterianc syter~ ~ ~he~eb~ the services can be c~ntin~~y : ~monit~re~. Opening Doors Immi atian Services a ees to make available its fin~ci records for review by pity at City"s discretion, In addition, Opening Doors Ymigration Services agrees to provide pity the following data and reports, or copies thereof: A. All external or internal audits. Opening Doors Immigration Services sha11 submit ~. copy of the annual independent audit to ~~ty thin ten ~ 1 ~~ days of receipt. B, All external ar internal evaluation reports. . An explanation of any mayor changes in program services. D. To comply with this section, Opening Doors ftnmigration Services agrees to maintain records that will provide accurate, current, separate, and complete disclosure of the status ~af funds Page ~ of 7 received and the services performed under this Agreement. The record system of Opening Doors Immigration Services shall contain sufficient documentation to provide in detail full support and ~ustificatian for each expenditure. Opening Doors hnigration Services agrees to retain all boos, records, documents, reports, and written accounting procedures pertaining to the serdces prodded and expenditure of fiords under this agreement for five years. E. Nothing in the above subsections shall be construed to relieve Opening Doors Immigration Services ofresponsibility far retaining accurate and current records that clearly reflect the level and benefit of services provided under this Agreement, ~~. DIRETOS' MEETTNOS During the terra ofthis Agreement, Opening Doors Immigration Services shall deliver to Oity copies of all notices of meetings of its Board of Directors, setting forth the time and place thereat wherein this program is a part ofthe subject matter af~he meeting. Such native shall be delivered to pity in a timely manner to give adequate notice, and shall include an agenda and a brief description of the matters tv be discussed, ~ ening Doors Immigration Services understands .and agrees that p pity's representatives shad be afforded access to ail meetings of its Board of Directors. Minutes of ail rrieetings of Opening Doors Immigration Services' governing body shall be available to pity within ten ~ 1 a} working days of approval. VII. TEI~NATION The pity may terminate this Agreement for cause if Opening Daars In~nrigration Services violates any covenants, agreements, or guarantees of this Agreement, the Opening Doors Immigration Services 's insolvency or filing of bankruptcy, dissolution, or receivership, ar the Opening Doors Immigration services' violation of any law or regulation to which it is bound under the terms of this Agreement. The qty Wray terminate this Agreement far other reasons not specifically enumerated in this paragraph. VIII. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS A. Opening Doors Imtrrigratio~r Serdces shall comply with ail applicable equal e~nployrnent opportunity and affiirmative action laws or regulations. B. Opening Doors Inrm.igration erdces will furnish all information and reports requested by pity, and will permit access to its books, records, and accounts far purposes of investigation to ascertain carnpliance with local, State and Federal rules and regulations. C. In the event of non-compliance by Opening Doors Innnixation Serdces with the non-discrimination requirements, the Agreement Wray be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whale or in part, and Opening Doors Immigration Services may be barred from further contracts with pity. page 3 of 7 Ix. TInE opening Doors Immigration er~ices represents and warrants that A, All infarn~atian, reports and data heretofore or herea~er requested b~ City and furnished to City, are carr~plete and accurate as ofthe date shown on the information, data, or report, and, since that date, have not undergone any significant change without written notice to City. B. Any supporting financial statements heretofore requested by City and fun~ishe to ~~ are corn lete accurate and fa~rl reect the financial cond1tlons ofpen~ng Doors ~igratlon ty, p a Y services an the date shown an said report, and the results ofthe operation for the period covered by the report, and that since said data, there has been na material change, adverse or athe~wise, in the financial condition of Opening Doors ~nu~igratian services. . No liti anon ar legal proceedings are presently pending ar threatened against Opening g Doors Inun~grat~an Services. ~, None of the provisions herein cantra~enes or is in conf Pict with the autharify under which 0 enin Doors Im.n~.igration~ervices is doing business or with the provisions ofany existing p indenture or agreement of Qpenir~g Door ~mm~ratian e~°v~ces. ~. opening Doors Immigration Services has the paver to enter into this Agreement and accept payments hereunder, and has tal~en all necessary action to authorize such acceptance under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. F, None afthe assets af~pening Doors Immigration Services are subject to any lien or encumbrance of any character, except for current taxes not delinquent, except as shown in the financial statements fi.ished by Opening Doors I~n~nigratian services to City. Each of these representations and warranties shall be continuing and shall be deemed to have been repeated b the subrrrissian of each request for payment. . ~CH.AN~ES AND AIEND~NS: A. Any alterations, additions, or deletions to the terms of this Agreement shad be by written amendment executed by both parties, except when the terms of this Agreement expressly provide that another method shall be used B. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that changes in the state, Federal or local laws or regulations pursuant hereto may occur during the term of this Agreement Any such modifications are to be automatically incorporated into this Agreement without v~ritten amendment hereto, and shall became a part of the Agreement an the effective date specified by the law or regulation. Page 4 of7 . ~ enir~g boars Irnn~igratian Services shall notify City of any changes in personnel ~~ governing board composition. I, IND~~VINIFYCAT`I~N ~'o the extent authorized by law, the opening Daars immigration Services gees tv indemnify, hall harmless, and defend the CITY, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all clai.n~s or suits for in'uries, damage, loss, ar liability afwhatver kind or eh,aracter, a~sing opt afor in ~ ~ . connection with the perfarn~ance by the enu7g Doors Im~gratlon Services or those services contemplated by this Agreement, including all such claims or causes of action based upon common, constitutional or statuto law, ar based, whole ar in part, Zupan allegations of negligent ar intendanal rY . acts afDpening Doors Imn~gratian Services, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors; licensees and invitees. . III, ~~F'~IC~' ~F I~~'ERE ~. opening boars In~nigration Services covenants that neither it nor any member of its governing body presently has any interest, direct ar indirect, which would conflict in any n~aner or de ree with the performance of services required to be performed under this Agreement, Opening g Doors Immigration Services farther covenants that in the performance ofthis Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed ar appointed as a n~embar of its governing body ~. opening Doors Immigration Services further covenants that no n~einber of its governing had ar its staff, subcontractors or einplayees shall possess ariy interest in or use hislher position far ~ r . a urpose that is or gyres the appearance of being motivated by desire for private gam for . ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 * ~ himselflherself, ar others; particularly thane with which helshe has family, business, ar other ties, ~1a officer, member, ar employee of City aiad no member of its governing body who exercises any function or responsibilities in the review or approval ofthe undei~aking or carrn out of this Agreement shall participate in any decision relating to the Agreein~nt which affects. his personal interest or the interest in any corporation,partnership, or association in which he bas direct or indirect interest. ~II, ~ V i ~ V it Any notice or other written instrument required or permitted to be delivered under the terms of this A regiment shall be deemed to have been delivered, whether actually received or not, when g deposited in the united States mall, postage prepaid, registered or certified, return receipt requested, or via hand-delivery or facsimile, addressed to Opening boars Immigration Services or City, as the case maybe, at the fallowing addresses Page 5 of7 ~.l~~l~'IU ~Vk,r1~ ~~1 i~ I~ i~ ~~i ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~€~ ~ • non doors ~r~ti~n ~Ce At~n, ltd ~~r ~ ~ ~. nne ~~ . ~~~ ~v~r~oe ~~t~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~l~~n, ~ ~~~~ ~`a~ ` ' ' address ~ endin n~tiee o~ch~r~ ~'~~dress ~~ the other ~th~r ~~rty may ehne ~~~ n~a,~n Y ~ dress b erted ~~, r~ ~ei~t re~~est~d~ at the a~o~re ad ~ . ~ ~.,~~ ' ' n ees shy. not tr~~'~ ~~ or o~ a~ A, ~ boars ~r~t~v , " c~~ ari ' th~ren~er to any ~~ ~~ ~~es, band, ts~ ~reen~~nt or ~terest therein, or and ~ , r athr ~nncia~ instron thaut the pear written ap~ro~al of ~. evmp~n~ ~ ' eernent is held ~~ b~ invalid, ille, ar nenforceab~e, the ~. ~f and ~ro~on ofthts ~` , , .. • • ~ free and sect and contue ~~ eo'orrn ~~ the an rm~a~n prav~sxo ~~ rein ~ o intent of both parties h~reta, ~ ~ to enin ~vors integration er~i~ hreunder~ or na ~~ent Sh ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ' ~ an ane ar mare instances u~an the terms ~ eondtt~ons ~~ a~n~ other act or ~l~re ~ ~ to ~n~st ~ • in ~ ~ to be ~ v~a~~rer ~~ ~ ~~ reh of this Agre~e~.t onst~tnte or be c~nstraed ~ Y . hieh ~ then or ubse uentl~ be eam~nitted b~ ~~ doors ~rnnnt~an covenant or dfanlt ~ y ~ • " aet or ~rnissn in nnner Apr ~~ pr~d~e ~ right, er~ces, Ne~~her shad ~~~ payrr~ent, ~ ~ re~.ed available ~~ i to enforce its ~ghts hereunder, which rights, payers, power, r~lge, or tY . ' ' e a~~a s ecic~ reser~e~. o tr~ttive ar agent ~~ t ~y pr~~.leges, yr remees ax ~ Y ~ ai~e the effect ~~ this pro~isi~n. ' eth.~r v~ith referenced exhibits ~ attach~~n~s, constitat the T~. ~h~s ~reen~ent, tog ' h~een a artier hereto, ~ and przor agreement, aser~ian, st~tnnt, enure agr~ent ~ • erst or a~her ca~tent o~ ~~~ ~ :a;th~s~ '~ent~ or ~ seq~en and ding, , " r ar effect ~rhatsoever unless prop~rl~ eec~ted ~ ~, and thereto, have and legal fo ee ap~rapriate, recorded as an a~nendn~ent ~f this ~gre~~t. ' rote retell in ~cordance with the laves o~the Mate of~'e~s and ~. This ~reernent shy be rp .. is eemen~ ~ be ~ of competent urisd~ction sitting venue ofan~ htigation eonrn~ng Eton aunt, Tomas, ~ i ~ ~ ~" the ~~S d~ ~~~~~ a~ ~hr ~~~tUr'eS ~~~~r ~ ~~~ ,~~~: ~~: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL F4 EDWIl~T M. SNYT)ER, CITY ORNEY ~~: ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ f • ~x~,~- ~. [,r ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ + ~~. ~~~ ~~~~~ AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Finance ACM: Jon Fortune SUBJECT Consider approval of tax refunds for the following property taxes: Name Reason Tax Amount Year 1. Evers Parks Ltd/Keybank Real Estate DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 6,814.71 2. First American/Nationstar Mortgage 2006 Overpayment 2006 $ 1,488.56 3. Ezell Air, Inc DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 861.51 4. GCBSXX, LLC DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 829.90 5. Ezell Air, Inc DCAD Supplemental Change 2006 $ 722.39 BACKGROUND Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. FISCAL INFORMATION The tax overpayment revenue fund would be reduced by $10,717.07. Respectfully submitted: Bryan Langley Director of Finance AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Utility Administration ACM: Howard Martin, 349-8232 SUB~TECT Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a Water Main Cost Participation Agreement between the City of Denton, Texas and Robson Denton Development L.P. for the City's participation in the oversizing of water mains and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this ordinance; authorizing the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date. (In the not-to-exceed amount of $247,308.26). The Public Utilities Board recommends approval (6-0). BACKGROUND Robson Denton Development L.P. is developing the Robson Ranch proj ect located at the southwest side of the city, west ofInterstate - 35W, north of Robson Ranch Road. The city has a development agreement with Robson that required them to extend an offsite waterline to connect their development to a new booster pump station to be built by the City of Denton on John Payne Road. The Robson Ranch pipeline was a combination of a 30 inch and a 24 inch waterline. The city wanted to oversize the section of 30 inch waterline that runs from the pump station to the west side ofInterstate - 35w to a 36 inch water line to provide extra capacity to support future development on the west side ofInterstate - 35W. The Robson Ranch development, the Southwest Booster Pump Station, and the offsite water line extension and the oversize waterline portion of the project are shown on Exhibit 1. The cost differential for this water line over sizing ($247,308.26) was determined by bids received by Robson and was submitted to the city by Robson's engineer (Biggs and Mathews, Inc., of Wichita Falls, Texas). The city's oversize costs also included some requested fittings and valves to facilitate logical extensions from this pipeline at designated locations requested by staff. These fittings and valves would not have been required of a pipeline to only serve the Robson Ranch development. The cost breakdown for the city's oversize participation is detailed in the attached Exhibit 2. Staff has reviewed these costs and compared them with costs for similar work on other projects in the area and is satisfied with these costs. These costs have also been reviewed by the developer and their engineer and they have agreed to this cost breakdown and total dollar amount. OPTIONS 1. Participate in the oversize agreement 2. Do not participate in the oversize agreement RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends participation in over sizing the 30-inch water line to a 36-inch line. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) The Public Utility Board recommended approval (6-0) at its December 10, 2007 meeting. FISCAL INFORMATION Oversize participation cost difference - $247,308.26. Fun ing sources: FY 2006 CIP -Oversize participation in the Southwest - $170,000.00 (revenue funds) FY 2007 CIP -Oversize participation in the Southwest - $170,000.00 (revenue funds) BID INFORMATION See Exhibit 2 EXHIBITS 1. Site Map 2. Detailed Cost Breakdown of City's Oversize Costs 3. Oversize Participation Agreement 4. December 10, 2007 PUB Draft Meeting Minutes 5. Ordinance Submitted by: . ~. Jim Coulter Director of Water Utilities Prepared by: - ~~ ~~•: 5 I'. ~. i,~i ~~ i t a t ' 4 ~ =FK v t+ Tim Fisher Assistant Director of Water Utilities EXHIBIT v (~ 00 000 OOOOM = 0 00 O N 000 O O O 00000 O O O O O OIL r M 000 0 0~ OOOOr N ONO M ~ ACA OM ONNN~O ~ I~ r M ~~ L a c~ 0 00 000 ooooc~ V 00 000 OOOOtD N O O O 0 0 0 0 C N O In N In O In O ('') ~ N~ cDNNNCD C M 0 c~ Q . ~ L a as N_ ~ N L O ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O N o 0 0 0 ~ N ° V o ~ N O C ~ aaa a aaa ~ zzz z zzz m N_ ~ N L O ~ ~ ~ 00 000 0000('') ~ N o0 000 ooooc~ 0 aio 000 ooooc~ V O O ~ In O O O O In N 0 0 0 0 N ONO ('') N r (~ C0 N In CO C ~ N N ca m ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~( ++ ° ~ W ~ ~~ N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ r N 3 ~ ~ ~~ aaa aaaaa C J J ~ W W W W W W W W R9 ~ ~ o i ~ m ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ c t~ o ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ • c~ ~' ~ N U 3 ~ (,,) Q M X Q O ~ ~ - O ~ U ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ •~ m ~ ~ ,y Q ~ ~ M ~ .+ L Y ~ p ~ _ m m Q O ~ V ~ ~ O , O c +~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ m • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, W ~ ~ ~ L U 3 ~ LD- ~ ~~ Q N ~ ~ .3 ~ VOM ~ O V ~ U U Z ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ N ~ (~ (6 » Q o ~~ L _ - L _ X- ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~~$ Q 0 ~ m m ~ x ~~ N x ~~t~t~ Q ` L ~ N N • • G7 C N~~ C ~,NOtDtD , ~1 N N N L (~ c~ c~ c~ oo aaa aoaaa 000000000 O O N 0 0 0 0 0 OOOOOOONO ~p O O O O O O O M O N O O M 0 0 0 0 0 OOCA00000 O O O O O O O M O OOOOOOONO 00 000Y7Y~NY~~tJ OOO~flO~f10Nt0 O O~ON~~ ~ MMNNt0~N~00 M r r N ` N 000000000 000oooo~no O O N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ('~ O O O (`') O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ('~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O N O O O O In In N lf) li) O O O lf') O lf') O N (~ ~ON~~ ~ ('~c'~NN(D~~n~o0 ~ ~ N 0 H O(`') 000 om o00 OfD 000 O ~ O O O O (`') O O In In (D O CA f~ M a aaaaa aaaaaa z zzzzz zzzzzz ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O In O O O O O ooc~ooooo ooriooooo O O N O O O O O O O N N N N N N O~N~~~ ~ OOOOOOOlAO 00oooooc~o 00ooooorio O O O O O O O N O O O In lf') O I.[) O N (~ (0 (0 In N (~ ~ N ~ 00 ~ N aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W c 0 N a ~ ~ a `~ ~> ~~~ ~ a~~m M ~Na~ L ~ ~ ~ a ~_ m ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N -~ 3 ,~ N (~ ~ ~ NNM M '~ ~ X X ~ 0 ~ m ~~•~ o a r~i r~i u~ m O L m a~ n' /~W~ ~ m ~ 0 0ml, ~ +, ~ U ~ ~ ~L ~ ~ ~ r, ~ ~ 1~V W U~~~~~~~ O XXN~~LL~~~ ~ ~o ~~ i~a ~a ~ ooo°O N X m m x~~C~~ H m m m X xmC~C~ rn O ~ N NNNN(Dt0 ~ N N NtDtD0000 ~ ~ N N~~~~~ ~ 4) N N~~~~~~ LL aooaaaaa ~ oooaaaaaa EXHIBIT 2 ~~~ THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § '~T~ N~ ~T FAB'~~I~'I~D ~~~~T - B~~'~ THE ~I ~~ B~1~T~, T.~A ~EAy l~ohsarz ~ I~el~ton Developr~en~ ~,~',~ hereln~er re~sr~ed to as "r~~~,eio~e~4~~~ whose ~usin~ss address is ~~ ~, ~lg~s aad~ ~~r, ~~es i~orx~ ~5~~~ ish~s ~~ develop .~ ir~p~~o~~ c~€n ~'eaf ~pre~~r t~~rr~~d ~l~e ~ "o~san ~~t~ch ]]avefo~~no~t" ~~~ shn~v~~ i~ ~xk~~bit r, at~acl~~d hereto an~~ irte~rpo~~~tc~d ~a~erein b~ re~er~rie~~ lac~~ed in tl» ~~i of ~er~t~n, Teas a~~ its e~~-~~tert~~torl~f ~~urisdi~tiona ~i~d is re t~iced to l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, , ~~~~ de such reel p~apey~ ~riih ~de~t~~te w~~~r, trar~sr~~ission o~aclt~y b deslgn~ng, eor~strl~c~ing -~~d- lt~st~iling ~ water li~-c of insit~e ~ll~~neter ~~ ~0 inches X34"}, l~ereinaer ref~r~~ed t~ ~s tlao "R~r~lxii`~d ~'acili~ies~'; and . ~~A, the Cif ~~ ~~nton, Teas, ~ lunlcipa~ ~orpor~~tion ~vith its ~~~~ lac~te~ a~ ~ 1 ~ ~s~ l~c~~n~y, Benton, Te~€~s ?~~~ ~, ~ierea~cr~ ~~e~e~red ~o ~s~ the '"~f ,„ in ~ ' i - ~ceord~nce ~vith its ordln~~ne~s, wishes tv ~artroip~te .1n ~l~e cost of the c~ntrl~c~l~~~ end lr~st~~lati~n ~~' sal water main to pr~vlcie for an 'tove~~sl~~d'~ ~~ter n~~in to ep~nd .ids utility y~terrr end lns~~~e adequate ~~~Ilzt~ service ~~- other customers; '~, ~ ,'1~pE, - in eor~~idera~icn ~~ tl~e m~~~~~al p~o~lses and ~~ven~nt~ - - ~ c~ntsi~~ed, h~r~in the Deve~~~er end the pity do 1~ea~eby ~~~ ~~, ~o~f~avrst - . 1, _ ~cveioper sf~~ff design, instafl, and' c~ns~r~uct} ~~~~o~irnatefy ~, ~ ~ llne~r feet ~f thlrt~ s~~ ir~c~i ~}~~ water ~~istribu~iot~ ~ii~e, ~n~ alf neeessarf a urter~~nee~ thc~e~o here der ~' P~ re~e~~x'~d #o ~s the "~vot~si~cd Facilities" ~~ sha~vn on xliibit I~ ~~t~ched ~~ereto and inco~~por~~ted herein ~~ re~erer~ce, : ~ , . ~ .. ~ -, ~~ A~s reclui~ied ~y t~a~ter ~ ofthe bode o~ ~rdina~nces o~ its ~~ ~cntol], Te~S, ~~~velape~~ cif l or~ter i~~to ~ ~~l~e~eio~n~ent ~o~tr~ct pr--for t~ l~egin~i~~g of-con~r~iction ~ e versi~ed F~~cili~tas, ,Tl~is ~~vel~pi~ent o~tract l~ att~c~~ed hereto ~s L~~h~hit a~ad li~co~~~er~ate~ here~vi~h h~ re~ercnce~, This ~g~cemcnt is s~~h~ect to ~r~d govert~e~ b~ said I~e~re~apn~ent ~o~~~r~ct.and and othei4 np~lic~l~fe or~f fn~r~ees o~'~he pity ofDen~ot~, Tex~s~ I~~'ior to ~einni~g ~~ constr~r~ction ~o~ ~i~e ~v~rsi~ed F~ciii~ies# De~rclopcr ~sh~ll ol~tair~~~ ~t ~e~el~~~~' sole cost 'and e~pcx~so, ill neeess~~~Y ~ert~its, llce~se at~~l e~scrrxent~, The c~sernen~s~ deeds, end ~l~ts tlieiefcr oht~ine~ by Develo~~r s1~~ll he reviewed end ~~r~~ed -~s to f~xF ~n sul~st~r~ce ~,~ t~l~~ plilor ~o the beir~nin~ ~~ caris~~uctinn, ~~ ~e~velopc~4 is . ~rn~l~le ~o ~oquire needed n~setr~ents, ]]evelo~er~ shall pro~vidc pity ~ftfi any re~~ested docurnent~tion o~ efforts to oht~~n s~~ch e~scrnet~ts, incl~~ding -evidncc; o~ negotiations ~~t~ reasonable avers made ~to a ~~~`ecte~l p~o~er~t~ o~v~ers,, ~ e~s~~aerrts far the ~versi~c~i ,Facilities ob~~~ned b~! the .Developer ~h~if~ be assigned to Ity} l~f not taI{an fry ~i"s pare,~pi1lor t~ acaopt~~ce ofthe ~vet~si~ed ~`a~llit~os, and~l~evelo . er~ v~at~r~nts clea~~ title p~ , to such easements ~n~~~rlll de~et~d ~~t~ a~a~~~s~ a~~y a~lve~ise cia~~n made ~garns~ ~~ch true, ~~ . City's sl~ar:c ~n the post n~' tlxc vez~si~e~ l~ acifltf es is based t~ an the dle~~enee i~~ the cyst ~~' insliing ~cgtair~~ F~cifities, ~s det~r~~~ined ley i, end the cost of tlx~. ~versi~ed F`a~ilitles, a cieteri~ined~~b ~i, shall lie in err. ~~~ol~nt riot to e~cecd EXHIBIT 3 Two hundred and farty~seven thousand three hundred fight ~~Ila~ Dollars ~~47,3aS.~~}, the maximum participation cast alla~ved herein. The City shall not, in any case, be liable far any additiar~al cyst because of delays in beginning, continuing, or completing construction; changes in the pricy ar east of rr~aterials, supplies, ar lobar; unforeseen ar unanticipated cast because of tapagraphy, soil, subsurface, or athcr site car~ditian; differences in the calculated and actual per linear feet of pipe ar materials needed ~`ar the ~vers~zed Facilities; Developer s decision as to the cantractars or subcontractors used to per~'orrn the ~varl~; ar any other reason or cause, specified or unspecified, relating to the cans~ruction of the Oversized Facilities. The City can make manthly payrrients far its share of the oversized Facilities ar mal{e a lump surn payment far its share of the Dversi~ed Facilities once the i~nprovenaents have been completed and accepted by the city, If manthly payments are requested, the Developer shall submit monthly pay requests an farms provided by the City. 'The Developer's engineer shall verify that each pay request is correct. Mach pay request, along Frith the engineer's verification, shall be submitted to the Engineering Transportation Department of the City The City mill retain ten percent {1~°~~} of the total dollar amount until the project is accepted. Payment by the pity to the Developer will be made within thirty ~~ ~~ days of receipt of the pay estimate and the engineer's verification. ~f a lump sum payment option is selected by the Developer, the Developer shall submit an invoice far payrr~ent far the city's share of the oversized Facilities ante the irnpraverrxents have been completed and accepted by the city. The Developer"s engineer shall verify that the final pay request is correct. The pay request, slang with the engineer's verification, shall be submitted to the engineering Transportation Department of the pity, Payment by the City to the Developer will be made within thirty ~3a} days of receipt of the pay estimate and the engineer's verification. ~. To determine the actual cast of the Oversized ~'acilitiesx City shad have the right to inspect any and all records of Developer, his agents, ernplayees, contractors or subcantractars, and shall have the right to require Developer to submit any necessary inf'aration, documents, invoices, receipts ar other records to verify the actual cast of the oversized Facilities. 7. All notices, payments or can~n~unications to be given ar made pursuant to this Agreement by the parties berets, shall be sent to Developer at the business address given shove and to the Director of dater 1`Jtilities far the City at the address given abave~ 8. Developer shall indemnify and bald City harmless from any and all claims, damages, lass ar liability of ar~y bind v~rhatsaever, by reason of injury to property ar person accasianed b any act ar ornissian, neglect ar wrangdaing of Developer, its officers, agents, employees, invitees, contractors ar other persons with regard to the performance of this Agreement and Developer shall, at its awn cyst and expense, defend and protect City against ~,. any and all such claims and demands, ~. If Developer does not begin substantial construction of the Oversized Facilities within twelve ~1~ months of the date of eecutian of this Agree~nenta this Agreement shall terminate. 2 ~ ~~ T"~1IS ~ns'4run~e~t ernbed~es the entire ~gr~en~ent of the parties t~ali~ta axed these ~~~ no pren~i~es, ~ex~tns, eandi~an ~r ohlig~tior~~ at~~er thin Chase ee~tained ar ~a~c~r~par~ted h~~•~itl, ~"l~ls Ar~er~en'~ sh~l~ ~u~e~~s~de ~~~ previa~~s camr~~~rtioati~ns, t4ep~~eset~tatian~s a~~ agr~~ents, ~hetia~r ~rerbal ~r ~rt~~tt~n, het~veen the ~~~~tie l~et~e#o ~r~th respect to the sul~j~ct matter atl~is Agr~e~r~ent~ 11, This A~reer~ent shall not he asi~ne~ ~y ~evelaper ~vithaut the ex ress r~tte~ ~ansent n~ t~~e C~t~, ~~ ~.ny and ail t~~ts l~or a~~ breech e~this ~~r~en~ent, ~r any athe~~ suit p~rta~nin - to ar ~t~lsing cut a~ this Areer~ent~ sl~ail be brox~ght in ~ court a~ eampetnt ~~~risdiotian in ~~tan ~Dljnty, Tox~s, Tl~ls ~.~re~n~ent sh~l~ be ga~e~~ned ~~ end canstru~d iri accol'd~nca - ~v~th tl~e ~~~ a~~e ~t~te ol~~'e~~s~ E~UTL~1~ in ~u~iicate a~~i~inal caur~terp~rt Icy the d~al~a~~tha~+~~ed acials end a~~icexs a~the ~ ~r~~ the I~eve~npar, an this the day of ~ ~~4 CST ~~` ;DT~1~, ~ - ~ ~ ~ Texas iV~~~t~ittip~l orpara~~an - ~~~ 4 Clty Manager ~ - AT~`E '~~ ~~, E~.~. I~. Snyder, ~ C~t~ At~~~ne~ ~ - , ~^ ~y; ,.~ ~ - Babson Lenten ~e~eiaprner~t, L,~', R ~~~ d JI f LAy 1/ 11~y+ ,1~1 ~~~ ~~ ` ~;~atir D~ctamo~tt~l~on~~~ts ~~~~N~~~r q~Qr~~~ P~rt~aip~~fan-Ge~t~ri~ S~aoim~n ~~~~.d~o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD December 10, 2007 After determining that a quorum of the Public Utilities Board of the City of Denton, Texas was present, the Vice-Chair of the Public Utilities Board thereafter convened into an Open Meeting on Monday, December 10, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in the Service Center Training Room, City of Denton Service Center, 901-A Texas Street, Denton, Texas to consider the following specific agenda items listed below. Present: Vice-Chair Dick Smith, Phil Gallivan, John Baines, Randy Robinson, Bill Grubbs and Bill Cheek (arrived at 9:13 a.m.). Absent: Chair Charldean Newell, excused Ex Officio Members: George C. Campbell, City Manager Howard Martin, ACM Utilities OPEN MEETING: CONSENT AGENDA: The Public Utilities Board has received background information, staff's recommendations, and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration. 1) Consider recommending adoption of an ordinance declaring that a public necessity exists and finding that public welfare and convenience requires the taking and acquiring of an approximate 0.278 acre permanent water easement and an approximate 0.197 acre temporary construction easement, both located in the Asa Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521 and both being within a parcel of land conveyed to Lee Anne Todd by deed recorded as Document Number 94-R0001091 in the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas; authorizing the City Attorney, or his designee, to acquire the easements through agreement or eminent domain; and providing an effective date. 3) Consider recommending approval of a water line oversize participation agreement between the City of Denton and Robson Denton Development L.P., for an amount not to exceed $247,308.26. Board Member Phil Gallivan moved to approve Items 1 and 3 with a second from Board Member Bill Cheek. The motion was approved by a 6-0 vote. The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 10:15 a.m. Exhibit 4 ORDINANCE N0.2008- AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A WATER MAIN COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND ROBSON DENTON DEVELOPMENT L. P. FOR THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE OVERSIZING OF WATER MAINS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (IN THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $247,308.26) WHEREAS, the City desires to participate in the cost of oversizing water mains to be designed, installed, and constructed by Robson Denton Development L.P. in an amount not to exceed Two Hundred Forty Seven Thousand Three Hundred Eight Dollars and 26/100 Cents ($247,308.26), in accordance with the applicable provisions of the city of Denton Development Code, §35.21.9.1 and 35.21.9.2; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City Manager is authorized to execute a Water Main Cost Participation Agreement Between the city of Denton, Texas and Robson Denton Development, L.P. (the "Agreement") for the oversizing of approximately 3,150 linear feet of thirty (" 30") inch water main to a thirty-six (" 36") inch water main; substantially in the form of the attached Agreement, which is incorporated herewith and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes; subject to Robson Denton Development, L.P. entering into a Development Contract with the city of Denton, in accordance with the Denton Development Code, §35.16.20.2. SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make the expenditures as set forth in the attached Agreement. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2008. PERRY R. MCNEILL, MAYOR 1 Exhibit 5 ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY By: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: EDWIN M. SNYDER, CITY TTORNEY By: AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Economic Development CM: Geor e C. Cam bell, Cit Mana er g p y g ~T 1RJF,(~'T Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to that certain Tax Abatement Agreement with Aldi (Texas) L.L.C. approved by the City Council on August 21, 2007, by providing that, as a condition of the Abatement, Aldi shall construct a certain portion of VVestcourt Road to specifications acceptable to the City of Denton and further providing that the construction of westcourt Road shall be completed and accepted by the City of Denton prior to the issuance of Tax Abatement by the City of Denton; providing for a severability clause; and providing an effective date. (Economic Development Partnership Board recommends approval 7-0.) BACKGROUND The City Council approved a 100% five-year tax abatement for Aldi Foods on August 21, 2007. The intent of the abatement is to reimburse Aldi Foods for the construction of VVestcourt Road at an estimated cost of $1.6 million. A condition of the agreement is that Aldi will not receive a certificate of occupancy for their distribution facility until Westcourt Road improvements have been completed. In the process of designing the road and determining the alignment, several issues have arisen that may delay the construction of the road. • In order to improve the road, additional right-of way must be obtained. The City of Denton owns the majority of the property on the west side of westcourt (Airport property) and is willing to contribute the necessary right-of way, but FAA approval maybe necessary as well. It also appears that a gas well heat exchanger is located in the future right-of way. • It will be necessary to obtain some right-of way from the east side of VVestcourt, and Aldi will work with the private property owners to obtain it. However, if the land owners are unwilling to sell the right-of way at a reasonable price, Aldi may enlist the aid of the City to invoke eminent domain. • One last complication involves the addition of aleft-hand turn lane on Airport Road - a TxDOT roadway. Aldi is already working with City and TxDOT engineers regarding the design of the additional lane. As you can see, private property owners and federal and state agencies have been added to the mix of stakeholders. Aldi is still optimistic that the road will be completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. However, they do not wish to take the chance that their operation will be held up. -1- Aldi is requesting that the tax abatement agreement be amended to state that in lieu of withholding the certificate of occupancy that the City will withhold any incentive until VVestcourt Road is completed. To show good faith that the road will be constructed as designed, Aldi will submit a payment equal to the cost to build the road at the time of the final plat and enter into a developer's agreement with the City. RECOMMENDATION: The Economic Development Partnership Board reviewed the Tax Abatement Amendment request at their November 19, 2007 meeting and recommends approval. Respectfully submitted: ~~ .~ •n ( ti r}-r/ _ tit. i r •5 ti ~ F ~I~1 ~ :r. + ~. w Linda Ratliff, Director Economic Development Department -2- s:l~ur documentslordinances1Q81a1~i tax abatement agr ord.~oc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDIl1iANCE ~~' THE CITY OF DENTON AUTHORISING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THAT CERTAIN TA. ABATEMENT AGREEMENT wITH ALDI ~TEAS~ L~L.C. A.~~ROVED BY THE CYTY COUNCIL ON AUG~UT 1, ~~07, BY PROVIDING T~IA.T, AS A CONDITION OF THE ABATEMENT, ALDI SHALL CONSTRUCT A CERTAIN PORTION OF wESCOURT ROAD TO SPECIFICATIONS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY OF DENTON AND FURTHER PROVIDING THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF wESCOURT RDAD SHALL BE COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF DENTON PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF TAB A.BA.TEMENT BY THE CITY OF DENTON; PROVIDING FOR A EVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFETI~E DATE. wI~EREAS, on. August ~l, 2~0~7 the City Council approved a Tax Abatement Agreement existing agreements with Aldi Texas} L,L,C.}and wHEREA~, the A.green~ent required Aldi to construct estcourt Road, from Airport Road south to pringslde Road ~a distance of approxln~ately ~,2~0 linear feet} as a two-lane, concrete road to specifications acceptable by the City of Denton; and WHEREAS, the construction of westcourt Road was required to be completed and accepted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the City of Denton; and wHEREA, due to conditions beyond the control of Aldi, the deli and construction of estcourt Road may extend beyond the completion of the Aldi distribution facility; and w~TEREAS, the Economic Development Partnership Board recommends Aldi be permitted to obtain its certificate of occupancy upon completion of all other re aired ~. construction, except the construction of estcourt Road; and wI-IEREAS, the Economic Development Partnership Beard recommends the grahting of tax abatement be withheld until completion of construction of westcourt Read in lieu of the certificate of occupancy; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1, The findings set forth the preamble of this ordinance are incorporated by reference into the body of this ordinance a if fu11y set Earth herein, SECTION ~. The City Council approves the withholding of the tax abatement until con~pletlon of construc~.on of westcourt Road ~n lieu of the certificate of occupancy. SECTION That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, prase, ar P word in this Ordinance, or applica.an thereof to any person or circumstance i held invalid b any court of competent jurisdiction, such balding shall not affect the validity of the remainxn s,lour d~cumentslordinance~~~8lal~i tax abatement air ord,~oc portions of this ~rdina~ace, the pity council of the pity of Denton, Texas hereb d Y eclares that they would have enacted such re~naln~n portions des ate an such invalidi ~ y ty ::~ ETI~~ 4, This ~rdin.ance shall hecomc e~~'ectiv ~ ~mechately upon. its passage and approval, ~~ PAP~D AND APPROVED this the day of ~ 008. PERRY R. cNEII1I~, II~AYOR ATTEST; ,NN~ER SALTERS, CITY' EORTAY BY; APPR~~D A TO LEGAL F~; EDWIN NYDER, OITY ATTORNEY B~Y. Page ~ s:laur dacnment~lcontract~lOS~fir~al am~ndmer~t - westconrt raad.dac Al1NDN~ENT T~ A TAB ABATEl1lYT ~1~EEENT ~ETwEEI~ THE ~ ~F DE~1'I'H~, TEAS This Amendment to the Tax Abatement Agreement the "An~endn~ent'}~ is rr~ade and entered into as of the effective date prodded for below, by and between Aldi Texas LL.C., Texas lln~ited l~ab~i~ty company ~"Aldi"~, and the CITY CF D~NT~N, a Texas municipal corporation the "City"}, far the purposes and considerations stated below: w~IEREA~, on August ~ l , ~~~~, the City Council approved ~`ax Abatement Agreement with Aldi ~Texas~ L.L.C.; and wI~EREA, the Agreement required Aldi to construct estcourt Road, from Airport Road south to pringside Raad ~a distance of appraxi~nately 4,200 linear feet} as twoWlane, concrete road to specifications acceptable by the City of Denton; and wHEREA, the construction of westcaurt .oad was required to be completed and accepted prior to the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy by the City of Denton and ~il~-IEREA, due to cor~ditians beyond the control of Audi, the design and construction of westcourt Road may extend beyond the completion of the Ald1 d~strrbut~on fac~llty; and wEREA, the Economic Development Partnership Board reca.n~.ens Aldi be permitted to obtain its certificate of occupancy upon completion of all other required construction, except the construction of westcaurt Road; anal wI~EREA, the Economic Develap~nent partnership Board recommends the granting of tax abatement be withheld until completion of construction of westcourt Road in lieu of the certificate of occupancy; N~, TI~REF~RE, the City and Aldi Texas} L.L.C. covenant and agree as follows: 1. paragraph I.F of the Existing Agreement is hereby amended as follows "A condition of the Abatement is that the owner shall construct westcaurt Road, from Airport Road south to pringslde Road {a distance of a~pprox~mately 4,20 linear feet} as half of a secondary arterial concrete road and to specifications acceptable by the City of Denton. Construction of westcourt Rand must be completed and accepted prior to the issuance of tax abatement by the City of Denton, In addition, owner agrees to enter into an areement with the City of Denton far the construction of westcaurt Road prior to receipt of their building permit and to deposit funds far said construction from which Owner may draw to pay its contractor or from which the City may draw far the purposes of building westcourt Rand in the event that Owner fails to construct westcourt Road within one ~ 1 } year after receipt of their certificatte of cccupanoy," . All other terms and conditions of the Existing Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. s;lour dacum~ntslcantractsl0lfmal amendment - westcourt road.dac . This A~ner~dr~ent hail be effective a of the cast date of sigr~re of a party a~ indicated below ~"The Effective date"}. ~T~ ~F DENTON, TEAS PERRY R. cN~~LL, ~Y~I~ DATE; ATTEST: ~ENN~FER ~vALTE~, IT"Y E~RETA~RY I3Y: APPR~ED A T~ LEGAL FARM: EI)~VIN ~VI. NY~EI~, CITY ATT~IEY f f'~' , ,~ ri ~~`}' 4 ~~ b~: ALD~ TEA} L.L.Q. ~Y: ITT FIUI~A DATE: ATTEST: Page ~ AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Solid Waste ACM: Howard Martin, Utilities 349-8232 ~T 1R.TF,CT Consider approval of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas authorizing the filing of a proj ect application with the North Central Texas Council of Governments for a Regional Solid Waste Program -Local Implementation Project; delegating and authorizing George C. Campbell, City Manager, or his designate, to act on behalf of the city in all other matters that are related to this project application, pledging that if funding for this project is received, the City of Denton, Texas will comply with all project requirements of the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and the State of Texas, and providing for an effective date. BACKGROUND Through grant funding from the State of Texas, the NCTCOG is the administrator of the funds collected from statewide fee paid to the TCEQ on solid waste disposal. Project funds are designated for joint and local solid waste projects during the state fiscal year that began on September 1, 2007. Approximately $1.4 million of reimbursable project funding is available for implementation projects in the current FY 2008 planning cycle. NCTCOG 2008 Grant Schedule: Project Application Submittal Deadline to NCTCOG: January 4, 2008 Council Resolution Submittal Deadline to NCTCOG: January 18, 2008 Resource Conservation Council votes to approve list of grant projects: February 14, 2008 NCTCOG Executive Board approves RCC approved grant list: February 28, 2008 NCTCOG contracts with funded project entities: Beginning week of March 17, 2008 Projects completed including Release of Claims: July 31, 2009 Project Description: Denton's requested grant will help fund equipment and educational materials to support the Solid Waste Department's efforts to work with construction contractors to meet their `Green Building' construction needs. To aid developers and contractors in meeting Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) construction criteria, the City Council approved the purchase of recycling roll-off containers for placement at local construction projects around the Denton area during their meeting of November 6, 2007. Reusable and recyclable materials are planned for source separation at various construction sites during a buildings construction or demolition process. The equipment listed in the grant will assist in the reuse and recycling of construction and demolition (C&D) materials, permitting the City to provide requested support of LEED construction criteria within the Denton community. The City will utilize selected recycling materials roll-off containers for the acceptance of applicable construction and demolition materials for which recyclable markets exist, or the opportunity for materials reuse exists. Denton's efforts in this area will aid the NCTCOG's Regional Solid Waste Plan of promoting source reduction, deconstruction, and construction and demolition material reuse. They additionally support the Council's recommended direction to provide increased commercial materials recycling and reuse opportunities within the Denton community. The grant includes funding to support a local public education campaign informing and promoting LEED construction goals, and the C&D materials recycling opportunities which are available for Denton's local construction and demolition projects. Additionally the application requests funding for city staff to obtain LEED education and training and program certifications, thereby enabling staff to assist local developers in a more professional and comprehensive manner. (1PTT(1N~ The City Council may or may not recommend approval of the resolution officially authorizing the filing of a project application with the NCTCOG for a Regional Solid Waste Management Plan - FY 2008 Solid Waste Implementation Project. If approved, the resolution must be submitted to the NCTCOG by January 18, 2008 in order to be considered for grant reimbursement funding. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the resolution for funding through the NCTCOG Regional Solid Waste Management Plan grant program in the sum of $33,970.80. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) Denton's staff attended the NCTCOG's FY 2008 grant information and training meeting on November 30, 2007. Due to the grant timeline dates provided in the background information above, it was necessary to bring this agenda to the City Council seeking resolution approval prior to presenting it to the Public Utilities Board. The Public Utilities Board will be provided this agenda information at their meeting of January 14, 2008. FISCAL INFORMATION Grant reimbursement funding is requested in the amount of $33,970.80. This grant requires quarterly Council of Governments reporting and reimbursement of funds. EXHIBITS 1. Grant Description. 2. Grant Task List with Timeline and Costs. 3. Grant Resolution. Respectfully submitted: A. Vance Kemler Director of Solid Waste City of Denton Construction and Demolition Recycling Program Goal: Time to Recycle Objective: Promote Source Reduction, Deconstruction, and Construction and Demolition Material Reuse Action Recommendation: Implement C&D Recycling Projects; Create a Recycling Guide for Contractors; and obtain Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification training. Project Description: The City of Denton has begun work to implement a Construction and Demolition (C&D) Recycling Program. C&D waste can occupy as much as 20% of the wastes found in landfills. According to the U.S. Census Bureau population estimate release on June 28th, 2007, the City of Denton is the ninth fastest growing city in the nation. The City continues to issue new construction permits for residential and commercial development that reflect continued growth within the city's jurisdictional boundaries (ETJ). Master Planned Communities (MPCs) encompassing thousands of acres of land recently annexed into the city limits of Denton will bring wide-scale residential, commercial, and industrial development, and with this growth comes construction waste. Therefore, the City of Denton Landfill will implement a Construction and Demolition Processing Center, open to all landfill and solid waste customers. This program will accept typical C&D building materials such as cardboard, wood, metals, concrete, asphalt, bricklstone, plastics, and any other materials forwhich markets or reuse options are available. The residential and commercial construction planned within the Denton area over the next several years will generate thousands of tons of recyclable and reusable C&D materials. The Denton Construction and Demolition Processing Center can serve as the processor to all customers that require C&D roll-off containers at their construction and/or demolition site. Additionally, C&D materials will be salvaged from containers and trucks brought into Denton's landfill for disposal by private citizens and privately owned companies. Therefore, these materials will no longer be deposited into the landfill and will no longer consume valuable landfill airspace. Airspace savings, as a direct result of diverting generally non-compactable C&D materials from Denton's landfill, will extend the life of the current and future landfill cells, thereby delaying the frequency and costs to Denton's citizens for construction of additional landfill cells. The grant funding requested will aid the Solid Waste Department in achieving greater efficiencies in implementing the C&D recycling project. Many of the construction materials will be source separated on-site during the construction process to expedite the recycling process. Roll-off containers are a large portion of the capital costs needed to capture and sort these materials. The purchase of these roll-off containers will enable the City to provide requested C&D recycling services and meet the area's expanding C&D growth. Additionally, the City of Denton Recycling Division plans to develop promotional and educational materials forthe C&D Recycling Program. We plan to Exhibit 1 create a C&D recycling guide for contractors and advertisements pertaining to the construction and development industry. The City of Denton Solid Waste Department is a national member of the US Green Building Council (USGBC), and is a member of the local North Texas USGBC Chapter. Solid Waste staff recently attended the USGBC's annual conference, Greenbuild, and will be working with Denton's Planning Department personnel to promote and encourage green building using the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED} standards for new construction. LEED is the nationally recognized standard for green building, providing the tools and resources necessary for the construction of cost- effective and energy efficient buildings. Staff will greatly benefit from LEED training and certification as LEED Accredited Professionals, allowing them to more fully understand the importance of the issues, and enabling them to better assist customers in their LEED Certified building project requirements. Staff has included within the grant request a portion of the funding requirements to obtain LEED training and certifications for staff. The City of Denton Fire Station No.7 is the City's first LEED certified facility. The City of Denton Recycling Division recycled the C&D material from this project and provided the required reports following the LEED certification guidelines. Roll-off containers will be placed at many of Denton's construction sites, thereby enabling contractors to meet LEED criteria and obtain construction goals. Sustainability: The City of Denton has made a commitment to being a leader in addressing waste issues. We have a curbside recycling program, six recycling drop-off centers, curbside appliance recycling, acomputer/electronics recycling station, commercial recycling, our Sustainable Schools Program, Home Chemical Collection Program, and curbside collection of yardwastes for composting. We support the GCA award-winning Keep Denton Beautiful program. Denton actively supports the NCTCOG's Regional Solid Waste Management Plan. The equipment, promotional and educational materials, and certification training the grant funding will provide will enable the department to expand the level of commercial recycling services the department currently provides, allowing staff to provide C&D waste management services. The program is planned to be in place for many years to come, as long as construction and demolition continues, and the need exists within the Denton area for this service. c o ~ ~ v ~ +~ o o ~ ~ r~ ~ U ~ U O ~ 0 ~ ~ Q C 0 ~ +' C 0 - ~ ~ +:+ 0 L O ~ a ~ ~ +~ ~ ~ ° ° o L ° ~ ~ r~ ~ > ~, ~'- ~ ~ ~ . ~ rn ~ O ~ ono O ~ L O- 0 ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ O E C ~ ~, ~ C ~ +~ ~ ~ n >. ~ >. ~ L 0 i a~ ~ + ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ • L L N - - a., ~, a~ N j N ~ ~~ N ~ N ~!'~ ~ C N .~ ~ ~ Q - ~ C ~ C ~~ , (6 ~~ X X +~ N +~ 0 ~ +~ '~ + ~ +~ s }' t O C 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ,~ 0 •~ U Q •~ Q ~ C v~ ~ ~ C v~ O N U O Z ~ C O to O U ~ U N u1 ~ u1 w Q O Q Q~ Q ~1 C i C DO ~~ O N L ~~ ~ N O ~ C ~ ~ 4A (6 N ~ ~ O C U ~ _ O ~ C N ~ • _ ,~ Z ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ C U ~ ~ N ~ C ~ ±J 0 3 ' U 41 O ~~ U ~ C o ~~ o a L - ~n x ~ w ~ a o ~ ~ U 3 ~ .a a~ O ~, ~ ~ ~ Z O ~' C ~ O N +O•+ C 0 0 +~ O O ~ •~ ~ (~ ~ L 7 ~ ~ L u 41 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ J ~ • ~ ~' ~ ~ +~ N ~ ~ C CO ~ ~ ~ ~ 'n U O C .~ ~ p +•+ N % 00 a C ~~~ ~ 'V Q aJ C U O N O~ ~ C~ C O C O O' ~ O ~ s bA ~,- ~L N N ~ C ~ ~ z~ ~ cn ~ C > co ~ U N U ~ D N O +•+ L }' ~ O ~ > ~ U ~ +~ 0 ~ ~ p O ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ N O a~ ~°o N uo - N C ~ ~~ 3' ~ 3 '~ VI C~ a~ ' +~ ~ U ~,u.~ Vf ~ f0 ~~~ E ~ ~ N a~ o Q N L *' L a~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ a~ C ~ N L 0 0 ~' 00 U +~ ~ ~ woo 3 N 0 0 ~ c~ L ~ m ~ 0 +~ O ~ ~ 0~ Q O L O ~ U 0 I1 ~ ~ ~ 0 L ~ ~ _-' ~ + ' C ~ ~ ~ N ~ 3 ~ m~ 0~ 0~ ~ L ~ p ~ m ~' ~ ~ ~ " a as ~ ~ - 3 a~ ~ C v o W ~~~ ~ v~ aoo ~ ~° - °~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ J ~ v, - ~~ , o ~, O N ~ a p L p m Q ~.Q ~~ ~ ' ~,~ ~ >` 3~~ N = w ~ou j `~ Q 3~a~ ~ ~ ~ O O C U 'L O L C >~ O s ~ O' R U L ~ ~ C ~ W N o~ O 0 C7~ N N Ls }, ~ C ._ _ _ ~ ~~ o . 0 J ~~ ~ ~*~ 3~ ~~~ ~ ~~3- W ~ a ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a.~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o a~ ~ i ~ ~ ° o ~ :oA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ a ~ vi ~ ~ o c ~ 3 o O p~~ 0 ~ C~ > o ~^ L~ ~ O 00 C .~ ~ ~ ` UL ~ .O ~ C .N O U 41 ~ .L L7 O O c0 Q L s p 0 N ~ dA N rl ~ r ~ L N L aJ N Q- dA 0 +~ O. Q N~ O N L~ U _ Q +•+ N U U Q~ N O Z bA Q Q +~ ~ c6 ~ ca \ ~ O C ~ L C C ~ 0- (6 ~ L ~ L ~ 0 QJ ~ (Q ~ C a--~ S f~ (6 ~? +~ L 4J U ~ bA ~ C t (~ 0> O L +-+ 0 ~ m ~ f0 a ~ 0 C +~ L O .~ V1 ~ C v1 0 Q 0 0 U dS Q~ L7 0 ~_ `.~ ~ v~ Q N N N N to 0 ~ +-' ~ >~ U ~ f6 f~ ~ ur t]A > [ U C f6 (0 +~ ~ Q C +~ .~ 0 C N O C O O O +~ ~ ~ Z ~ N C V O N O • +~ L ~ O 0 ~ U ~ C L U N Q L N~~ O X .~ w ~ C O~ 0> N O~J ~ \ ~ 0 ~ ~ z C ~ ~ ++ ~ ~ L Q ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 ~ w 4A N U O ~ U U~ C~ O ~ C 00 C U L ~ U C~ O L L C ~ ~ N ~ Z O 1 U ~ U N ~ O ~ (0 Z ~ ~ L .U ~ L v1 Q. ~ *~ v~ ~' o ~ ~ ~ •}' ~ o 0o ~ v fl. *' ~; •`_-' ~ p,0 ~ ~ a o. C ~ ~ ° ~ ~ °J ai ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ vi o ~ . ~ ~ L a ~ ? , ~ N i ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ O ~ }' • o +~ ~ a ~ 3 O ~ N O r~ ~ U ~ N > a~ .~ ~ '~ ~ +~ .~ L r~ (/~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ C U ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~~m~~ am~ ~ ~ 0 3 ~° ~ `" °~ am ~ ~'uo ~ N a~mcl u ~o ~ ~ L 0 C 0 L C ._ +~ C ~_ v !~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ •~ ~ 0 ~ L O N .U ~ L f ~ ~ ~' ~ 3 ~ v 3 l7 ~ N c ,} • 0 L ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ *' ~ +~ O ~ ~ o C ~ '~ ~ o ur U O~ U~ U ~ C 0 0 ~ O C +~ ~ z L O U ~ CAA L 4J C N ~ ~ Q Q U ~ V 0 0 ~ • 0 ~ +~ Q~ O ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ N U O L ~ ~ z z L U U +~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ (^ i O ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ U aJ a ~ 0 4.J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 C 'L ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ a~ ~' ~ m - ~ z r~ O `~ a~ o rw~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ° ~ ° ~ ~ C +~ s rL ~, x ~ L > o O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ,`- a~ ~ N L a~ ~ S~ ~ ~ a o ~ ~3 ~ ~ v ~~~ p L C C QJ ~ O 3~ °J o~ C (0 ~ •> +•+ U G pp ~ ~ C- C L X 0 0 >' ~ O Q ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ O dl ~ O cOn 0 ~ O. ~ ~ O ~ •L ~ C ~ ~ O ~ ~ L t C ~, +~ U ~ +•+ C ~ +~ L U U o ~ ~ c~ Q L •N L ~ N Q U U bA ' L A N 4J L C p N O C .~ 0 ~~ Q O ac ~ Z c~ 3 0 3 L ~ tw a U~ ~ c~ ~ u ~ N m ~ ~ N .~ .~ W U z W J U W m NQ L.f_ W J W U Q ~ a~ O o 0 0 v ~ ~ 00 O O +~ O O O ~ O N ~ ~ ~ .. s ~ ~n a~ N ~ lD U ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ m v . ~ L ~ L ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U a; ~ u ~ N ~ ~ ~ r~ . v ~ ~ N ~ v1 N O v (6 L O ~ ~ O p L~ 0 U N O O W Q ~ Lf1 ~ ~ L 111 Q J Q oU ~/} N ~ Q t!} L '; L .U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q1 ~ Q f6 ~ ~ U ~ U 0 X ~ ~ O O Q1 +~ Q1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,~ ~ ~ U '~ p N 00 ~ W Q O +~ w X O C/) J N N C bA C vi .~ p ~ ~ W ~ ~ W p J ~ +~ .- W O ~ W O S J ~ ~ a1 ~ O ~ ~ o ~ a +~ ~ o ~ a~ ~ ~ + .~ ~ U 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c a~ (6 L ~ ~ ~ L C C ~ ~ ~ N O (0 ~ O O a"r X ~ O p ~ ~ qA ~ O O N N ~ cn O '}, ~ '~ ~ 1 ~ Nom., bA ~ U ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ L ~ N ~ ~ O ~ ~ O N ~ U O ~ VI ~ U u ~0 ~ ~ ~ - L ~ ._ ~ a~ N ~ `~ p L W N ~ v1 +~ V1 ~ c a N ~ ~ ~ Q u ~ m~~ U ~ ~ bA ~ ~ .~ ~ *~' ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ 0 ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ b~A p ~ ~ O O ~ C J ~ O ~ U C ~ C ~ U Q 4A Q1 +' O ~'~, ~ p ~ ~ C t ~ W ~ f6 L p p J 0 ~, C (6 ~ U _O J O ~ f6 J O~ O N (6 ~ L~ 4J U ~ L C ~ ~ C ~ N ~ v ~ ~ '~ (~ W - N c~ O U ~ _ ~ ~ ,L ~ L O. U +~ V1 *' p ~ ~ ~ O W f~6 Q [~6 ~ U U U c! ~ ~ 0 O Ol m m s:laur dacumentslresalutions1081~a1id waste gang autlaanzatian jan 2~~S.dac R.EDLUTYDN N~ R~OOB- A REOLUTI~N ~F THE CITY C~UNC~L OF THE CITY ~F DENTIN, TExA AtJTH~RI~INC~ THE FIL~NC~ ~F A PROJECT APPLICATIQN KITH THE NORTH CENTRAL TEA C~UNC~L ~F C~~~ERNMENT F~~ A REI~NAL SLID ATE PR~CrAM - LOCAL IP~EENTATI~N PROJECT; DELEATIN AND ACJTH~R.I~IN THE CITY MANACxE, ~R. HIS DEINATE, TD ACT ~N BEHALF ~F THE CITY IN ALL MATTERS THAT ARE RELATED T~ THIS PRDJECT APPLICATION, PLEDINC THAT IF FUND~N FAR THIS PROJECT` I RECEDED, THE CITY ~F DENTIN, TExA wILL COMPLY ITI~ ALL PROJECT REIJIREMENT F THE NDI~TH CENTRAL TExA COUNCIL F O~RNMENT~, THE TEA C~MM~IDN N EN~IR~NMENTAL QUALITY, AND THE STATE QF TEA., PROVIDINCr FDR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. wI~EREA, the North Central Council of Governments ~~CTCD~ has been. directed by the Texas Commission on Environmental duality ~~CE~ to administer solid waste project funds for the implementation of the NCTCDG adopted ol`d'ie to R.ecycl~'; and wHEREA, the City of Denton, Texas is qualified to apply for project funds under the ` ~~~~ Request ~~~' Appllcatlon'; end wI~EREAS, the City Council of the pity of Denton has expressed their support and interest regarding the above'referenced solid waste pro j ect; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN~TDN I~ERE~Y REGLE•. SECTION _ 1. The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby delegates and authorizes the Ci Manager, or his designate, to complete the application and seed in the a lication to request pro j eet funding under the North Central Teas Council of overnent ~1 , f , # # ~ i `Request for Appl~ctlon'for the in~piementat~on of the Regional Sold Waste Management Plan, and the City Council hereby f~uther errrpowers and authorizes the City 1Vlanager, or his designee, to act on the behalf of the City an all matters that are related to the project application, and any subsequent project contracts} that may result therefrom. SECTION 2. should the ro' ect be funded, then the City of Denton, Texas shall comply ~J with the re uirements of the North Central Texas Council of Crovertunents, the Texas q Comrr1ission on EnvironYnental duality, and the Mate of Texas. SECTION ~~ The project funds and any project-funded equipment and facilities will be used solely for the purposes for which they are intended under the Pro ject~ SECTION 4. The actlvlt~es of the city shall comply with and support the adopted local and re Tonal solid waste n~anagen~ent plans adopted for the geographical area in which the g activities are performed. Exhibit 3 s:lour documentslresol~tionsl~Sl~olid waste grant authorisation jan ~~~S.doc ~CT~~N 5. This reso~u~~an ha~1 became effeotxe imed1atel~ upon ~t pa~s~e and apprava~. PAE~ A1~D .~PPROYI~ this the day of . ~a~8. P~~RY R. oNEII~~} IIY~~ ATTP~T. JENNI~'~R ALTER., CITY ECRETA~Y ~Y: APP~~~ED A TO LEGAL F~~1VI: EI~~VIN NI. NYDER, CITY ATT~IEY .~ BY: 2 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed DEPARTMENT: Materials Management to Phil Williams 349-8459 ACM: Jon Fortune CTTR.TFf'T Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Ordinance 2007-260 so as to award aone-time purchase for overhead mounted and underground pad distribution transformers for Denton Municipal Electric; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3886-One-Time Purchase for Overhead and Underground Distribution Transformers awarded to Wesco Distribution in the amount of $770,846, and to Techline, Inc. in the amount of $98,676 for a total award amount of $869,522) BID INFORMATION On November 6, 2007, Council awarded Bid 3886 to TEC Utility in the amount of $676,821. After award, TEC Utility withdrew their bid. The manufacturer, General Electric, identified a bid error, and could not supply the specified transformers at the bid prices. (The November 6, 2007 Council agenda sheet is included as Exhibit 1). The remaining bidders were asked if they could hold the bid prices firm until January 9, 2008. HD Supply was unable to hold their pricing due to the same bid error by General Electric. Both Techline, Inc. and Wesco Distribution offered to hold their pricing. The change in award of the transformers will cost the City an additional $192,701, however based upon the bid error; this is the fair market value. The lead times for transformers are lengthy, and Denton Municipal Electric (DME) has numerous projects pending arrival of these units. This has created asituation inwhich re-bidding is not in the best interest of the customer. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS) Council originally approved this item on November 6, 2007 (Ordinance 2007-260). RECOMMENDATION Rescind the award to TEC Utility as referenced above, and award aone-time purchase of transformers to the following vendors: TtPm ~ VPnr~nr 2-4 Techline, Inc. 1, 5-7, 9-16 Wesco Distribution Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED) The bid submitted by Irby was disqualified due to numerous exceptions to the specifications, and HD Supply was unable to extend their bid pricing. The bid tabulation sheet is included as Exhibit 2. The bid evaluation sheet is included as Exhibit 3. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Wesco Distribution Techline, Inc. Haltom City, TX Ft. Worth, TX ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The estimated delivery schedule for the transformers is six months from receipt of an order. FISCAL INFORMATION These items will be issued out of Warehouse stock as they are needed and charged back to the appropriate project account. Respectfully submitted: ~~~ Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent Exhibit 1: AIS- November 6, 2007 Exhibit 2: Bid Tabulation Exhibit 3: Evaluated Transformer Costs 1-AIS-Bid 3886 Exhibit 1 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: November 6, 2007 DEPARTMENT: Materials Management ACM: Jon Fortune Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed to Sharon Mays 349-8487. ~TIR.TECT Consider adoption of an Ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding aone-time purchase for overhead pole mounted and underground pad mounted distribution transformers for Denton Municipal Electric; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3886-One-Time Purchase for Overhead and Underground Distribution Transformers awarded to Wesco Distribution in the amount of $43,544 and TEC Utility in the amount of $676,821 for a total award amount of $720,365). (The Public Utilities Board approved this item by a vote of 5-0). BID INFORMATION This bid is for the one-time purchase of overhead and underground transformers that Denton Municipal Electric (DME) uses to provide electric service to its residential and commercial customers. Distribution transformers are used to change voltages from 13,200 / 7,620 to lower voltages that can be used by customers. If transformers are not stocked at the DME facility, existing units that fail cannot be replaced, and service cannot be extended to new residential and commercia customers. DME also requires three special distribution pad mounted transformers (line item #8) to supply substation power at the RD Wells Interchange. The special units will receive high voltage primary service directly from the 12,470v delta tertiary windings of the 150MVA auto- transformers in the interchange. This distribution transformer purchase recommendation is based upon the total cost of operation for each size transformer utilizing an industry standard formula that includes initial cost, full load loss cost and no-load loss cost. Losses directly correlate with the efficiency of the transformer. Since transformers are continuously connected to the electric system, the watts loss over a multiple decade life is a significant evaluation factor. The lower loss transformers cost less to operate than higher loss transformers. The evaluation of the loss factors is included as Attachment 2. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS) The Public Utilities Board approved this item at its October 22, 2007 meeting. Agenda information Sheet November 6, 2007 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Exhibit 1 Award the one time purchase of transformers to the following vendors: TtPm # 1-7, 9-11,13-17 8,12 VPnr~nr TEC Utility Wesco Distribution The bid submitted by Irby was disqualified due to numerous exceptions to the specification including the use of non electric utility industry standard FR3 dielectric fluid instead of mineral oil. Irby also required adjustments to be made in their submitted bid prices based on actual transformer delivery lead times that may vary from the quoted lead times by using a Cooper derived CPI Index. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Wesco Distribution TEC Utility Haltom City, TX Decatur, TX ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The estimated delivery schedule for the transformers is six months from receipt of an order. FISCAL INFORMATION These items will be issued out of Warehouse stock as they are needed and charged back to the appropriate project account. Respectfully submitted: ~~~ Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent Attachment 1: Bid Tabulation Attachment 2: Evaluated Transformer Costs 1-AIS-Bid 3886 Exhibit 2 Bid #3886 Date: September 13, 2007 One-Time Purchase for Overhead and Underground Distribution Transformers COD 1-Time ITEM Warehouse Order DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR # Qty. TECHLINE, INC. WESCO DIST. HD SUPPLY TEC UTILITY IRBY Principle Place of Business: Fort Worth, TX Haltom City, TX Corinth, TX Decatur, TX Fort Worth, TX OVERHEAD - POLEMOUNTED TRANSFORMERS 1 28586000 6 TRANSFORMER, 10 kVA 120/240v $1,273.00 $1,085.00 $819.00 $772.59 $1,090.00 2 28586005 12 TRANSFORMER, 15 kVA 120/240v $1,175.00 $1,225.00 $949.00 $895.45 $1,249.00 3 28586010 18 TRANSFORMER, 25 kVA 120/240v $1,604.00 $1,548.00 $1,157.00 $1,056.85 $1,601.00 4 28586015 24 TRANSFORMER, 50 kVA 120/240v $2,321.00 $2,137.00 $1,881.00 $1,775.65 $2,317.00 5 28586020 2 TRANSFORMER, 75 kVA 120/240v $5,208.00 $4,061.00 $2,114.00 $1,995.95 $2,738.00 6 28586025 1 TRANSFORMER, 100 kVA 120/240v $6,513.00 $3,824.00 $2,582.00 $2,437.59 NO BID 7 28586001 2 TRANFORMER, 10kVA 240/480v $1,584.00 $872.00 $856.00 $780.39 $956.00 Standard price deduct for transformers supplied without required tank mounted Lightning Arrester assembly, $26.50 $23.00 $20.00 coiled High Voltage lead and wildlife nrntartnr Transformer Manufacturer: Howard Ind. A66 G.E. G.E. Cooper Only NEW parts & equipment are used in the manufacture of supplied Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes transformers: YES or NO Authorized Distributor by Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Manufacturer? YES or NO Delivery can be made within 6-14 Weeks 8-10 Weeks 10 Weeks 10 Weeks 8-10 Weeks weeks of receipt of order. UNDERGROUND - PADMOUNTED SINGLE-PHASE TRANSFORMERS 8 SPECIAL 3 50kVA PMT, 12.47kV DELTA HV- $5,445.00 $4,436.00 NO BID NO BID $4,274.00 240/120V UNDERGROUND - PADMOUNTED THREE-PHASE TRANSFORMERS 9 28586085 4 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 150 kVA $17,113.00 $11,476.00 $9,864.00 $9,012.19 $13,230.00 208Y/120 10 28586090 1 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 225 kVA $17,767.00 $13,801.00 $13,103.00 $11,307.65 $16,328.00 208Y/120 11 28586095 g TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 300 kVA $18,580.00 $14,152.00 $11,718.00 $10,706.60 $26,460.00 208Y/120 12 28586100 2 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 500 kVA $23,138.00 $15,118.00 $18,029.00 $16,473.10 $27,211.00 208Y/120 13 28586125 2 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 300 kVA $19,133.00 $17,007.00 $12,884.00 $11,117.79 $21,214.00 480Y/277 14 28586130 7 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 500 kVA $28,265.00 $17,242.00 $16,336.00 $14,925.89 $26,863.00 480Y/277 15 28586135 7 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 750 kVA $36,760.00 $30,378.00 $19,784.00 $18,076.15 $34,157.00 480Y/277 16 28586140 5 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 1000 kVA $40,989.00 $36,027.00 $31,645.00 $28,913.75 $41,874.00 480Y/277 17 28586145 2 TRANSFORMER, 3PH. UG 1500 kVA $47,160.00 $30,919.00 $33,372.00 $30,491.39 $57,884.00 480Y/277 Transformer Manufacturer: Howard Ind. 3 ph A66 G.E. G.E. Cooper 1 PH. 3PH. Only NEW parts & equipment are used in the manufacture of supplied Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes transformers: YES or NO Authorized Distributor by Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Manufacturer? YES or NO Delivery can be made within 6-26 Weeks 10-30 Weeks 9-14 Weeks 30 Weeks 10-18 Weeks weeks of receipt of order. Bidder's Comments: *Prices shall be FOB Denton, via flatbed truck or trailer. U E a __ c J ~ ~~ L o J m 0 3 X ~ O O O O O O O O O O ~ O *i O T O T O tD O O O l0 O 117 O ~ 9 aU Cw ~ 7w-,-I 'O m C > L ~ m N_ m. 3^ ~f -6 •0 ~ •0 C `~ O L y •p L(1 Y N y U C J -6 ~ U O N U dS ~ C N O V 7 OJ vl N ~ O ~ [0 ~ L O N I~ M Q7 N M N ~ rl M M M M ~ ~ •O m r1 ~ rl L N a O O ~ O •O 07 •0 !n ~ ~ ~ ~ r1 M W ~ ~ In L~ N n ~ lD N ,1 T n O I~ O N O ~ lD M M L!7 l0 Qi O L N a O to N to OJ O ,-I i ~ 0 9 O N~ N E 6l L •L ~ C U D O L ~ •p C C In ~~ C a a C j ~.' O N rL6 ~~ L •6 N- m' to 9 O a N L m C E N of O O N OJ .6 ~ to ~~ O 07 N C ~+ 9 N U Z W > ,.., > i t0 O ~ M I~ O Z n O U N ~ O Z O Z 0] ~ ~ D ,-I M N ~ M O ~ O N O M N In ~ tD O Q~ O U } } O *~ ~ ,~ N L W -6 Y U_ u7 07 L •0 E N C m u7 w U N C >, O O~ E N ._ N ~+ m m 3 ._ i O T ' '0 U ~ a Ol ul > > ~ err ePr ePr ePr ePr ePr eff eff W eff Hr eA Vr Hr yr to u 0 E .> p~ 7 a m C O~ U C a L W ~~ UI D D (p L D 61 ~ M ~' w L W C I C C ~ C ~ U aUi+ ~ ~ •o ._ ~ ~ ° c ~ ~ ~ m 117 In Oi In O In N In O m rl m rl ~ rl u7 (\ 0 O o M rn tD rn N ul tD ul lD m i0 ~•0 COY > N m Ow i N~ a O C ~G L u7 N N C ~ i0 In ~ ~ m ~ ~ a7 o m O D •° ~ ; o E N ~ a o rv -o ~ ~ ~' m~ D C re a ~+ •L N -~ L Q C 9 ~ ~1 ~ O ~ Z _ N ] L ] ~' m ~ M ~ t0 ~ rl O ~ N 0'J ~ O D M W U O M N N N } ~ 41 } D ri a 0~ O (\ ,~ +-I CO pJ O ~ f~ O O o, O (\ (\ 117 ~ N Oi lD O f~ 111 M O ri I~ ri W (~ N ~ } N O } O M m ip m L N L > ] L '~ ~ > ~ O m a U) N m m m N O ~L a w w Q ~ O N +~ ~ - 07 O N 7 N O~ p O J C C U C~ i -6 •O W N L77 D C Z 07 C O 117 07 7 C • N V L W > U W ~ U N Q rl tR rl tR N tPr M +Pr ~ t4 tD ePr rl t4 ffr Z 117 *~ +fr 0~ +~ t4 +-I N ffr rl M fff O N {fr f~ N {fr M ~ {fr N vl '1r O 0~ err .6 D •6 D ~ C m 6 > O 'i O m 7 m '-I m ~e w- UI f0 UI m C 07 •6 p m c J N y D- N O D +' D m L ~ N a ~ m m N L O ~VI ri ~_ ~ Z L N N N O ~ ~ m 3 ~ c c ° z ~' ~ • Gl ~ u ~ ~ p ~~ 3~ ~ IA ~ T a x ~ 0 O 0 117 0 N 0 ~ 0 rl 0 l4 0 O 0 O 0 ,-I 0 O 0 N 0 D 0 ~ 0 I1) 0 O 0 M C (Q L ,~ Q) O ~ Z W > a 0 U1 O 2 ~ +~ C •i O U rl n M rl err N 'i I~ rl etr ~ n N N etr Lf7 O Lf7 M yr O N N ~ yr N 'i N lD trr I~ 'i In rl ur W (~ i i ~ u) N } to N } O T'1 u m O Z t0 4• Lf1 ,-I ar O O O N ar W O N N err ~ lp N M err ~ M N N err M M T N yr I~ ~ Il) ~ yr l0 M L(1 117 err L(7 O M CO err W ~ N N } N OJ } r~i ~ C Z _~ IC ' p j L ~ O O O O O D D O O N O M O Qi O In O N O D O ~ O 07 O ~ .. ~ O ~ ~ a~6 ~ E > ~ N~ N A M m D a9 O m ~ ,~ y L m U W ii ~ >. ~ U O O O ~ L!7 O O L!7 l0 D ~ N Il> ~ ~ D In N T O M m 07 ~ i In N to N D rl ,~ ~ I~ N N N N O rl O 0~ ~ rl N O D rl N ~ Lil ~ m m N N N OJ ~ i m a N L~~ ~ to N~ N ~ Y N M 'p [ 3 ~ N m L C ~ E O l0 r1 rl N O N l0 ~ N l4 a• iD ~ rl Q ~ } } ~ ~ Ln M t0 I!) O ri ~ ~ lD L~ ~ O O rl O O O O O Q } } O *e ,_ '~ 07 07 N +' Y 00 O m cn 7 ~ ~ ,~ E ~ ~ `~ m O UV7 v ~ 2 err ePr ePr ePr ePr ePr ePr Hr ,-I {~} N eff N efr M eff N dr M efr ~ Vr VI yr ~ yr m a N> OJ U 7 ~ ~ L 3 ~ ~ N O a,° au, HN ~ D ~ O J N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ar ~' N O ~ 0 O M 0 O i 0 N 0~ 0 ~ D 0 ~ L~ 0 lD l 0 O L~ 0 ~ ~ 0 117 N ~ ~ N • N ~ Z W > C •- L U ~ O > > i ~ ~ N Q~ rl ePr O I~ Q~ rl ePr O O ~0 N ePr M O rl ~ ePr D M O N ePr ~ ~ O ~ ePr '-I l4 N N ePr ~ H ~ m 03 2 117 ~ N ~ N N } N N } ~ '~ ~ ~,.~ M r1 ~ ~ 0~ ,-I N ar r Q~ In N eff Q~ I~ N W l In ~ M eff N O N Hr r M O ~ efr rl N Ill dr 0 Qi ~ l0 yr O N 07 Vr 0 ~ ~ m ~ 2 UI N } N O } ~ fV ~ O Z C 0 ww ~_ m LUwEa c J ~~mL o o E•o o ,~ 3•m~ a° a~~ ~ a> O 'w Q m 3 J >( ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~a Q > N 7w-,-I •O O+•+ m N m_ ~ •0 •0 ~ •0 C '~ O~ O C '0 ~>~ N O C J~ N N 3^ ~ ~t O ~ ~ O O O O O •6 D O L D O O O O O O O O O O L ~ N U~ ~ C E N O U 7 N 9 dS ~~ Y N Vl U '_ ~' S y~ ._ 61 L_ O D 7 O N~ ~ ~ C C N ~ c L ~ • O } 07 ~ N L O O Q~ Q1 ~ rl O ~ rl O M ~ ~ ~ a O D O Uf ~ In ~ D ~ i ~ ~ O M N W N M O lD ~ r-I r•I N ~ rl N M lD O I~ L~ ,•-I ~ I~ O ~ CO O N a O N N N OJ ri i L O ._ UI i--i a c' + O ar m Ti 0 3 a ._ > V - ~+ L ~ Q L •O N - m N a N .'-, L m C N C E ~ Q N ~ QJ ~ O N !n CYJ O O1 • U ~ ~ Z W > > > i O ~ ,-1 ePr N ~ ,-1 ePr ~ ,-1 eR M N eR n N eR O Z ~ ~ ~ O U N yr } } ~ N ~ Hr M ,-I tD ri lD N N N ,-I N lD N ~ M ,-I ~ n 117 O U } } O *~ 0 N L W- •- U Y In Ol ~ L •0 0 E 3 C ~ OJ m ~ '- _ m uI w U U C m N ~ 7 O ~ ~ > U7 ~' > m C > m ++ L UI L O ~ ~ •0 N N +' Ol m ~ a O O 07 Ul m ._ ~ > to ~ ar ar yr yr en yr yr err err u a ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ _ ° L 67 ~ o ~ a c w ~ ~ N o yo ~ ~ •LOE>pa apm~•-+'Uc„~ cE °om ~ ~ M L W ~ ~ 117 ~ ~ C~ o ar C aU+~~ Q 11l ~ ~ Ill lfl ~ N N~ O N~ cnY•OLO O Nw N UJ~ O vl0 N ~ •6 6 a 01 • ~ LY >~ ~+ Y` r Q~ ~ L!) Ul 0~ L(1 ~D L(1 Q~ Q~ 117 Q~ ~ o _ O ~ ~D O ~D O ,-I Q f~ Q ~ rl I~ Q M 6 ~ ~ L m D O m O y O E l O N ~ N l1 *' (p O ~ c a m m N +' 'L m ~ m ~ L j ~ a m i '~ ~ ` ° E ~ D ~ Z ~ ~ U L 7 ~ m ' N I~ ~ ~ 117 U ~ 117 O ul I~ ~ ul U U ~ M ~ ' O ~ ~ W U M N ,~ N } ~, N } O rl 07 O N '~ O ~ O M to O f~ M f~ ~ r\ ,-I rl ul N Q• ~ f~ O M ,-I Q~ ,~ Q~ ~ W U' m ~ } m ~ } D M > a > ~ N a a i r U O ,e a 07 cn '~ V Y g O vl a+ L 07 C O N C 3 0 0 N 0 O C C U C~ i •0 W N 07 3 ._ O ~ O C •- ~ C Z 07 C Olll 07 mL~ In O.0 > i._._y C W > W ~ O th ~ ~} rl {i} rl t4 rl ePr N t4 y} Vr Z ~ tR ~ tR O err ~D tfr ~ tR ~ Ht DJ t4 O7 yr O t4 _ r ~ ~ O ~ ~ 07 J m N '1 m ~C w ~ In ~ V7 m m ~ C Lr7 N ;' 07 m N ~ ~ O C y O - 9 O O N U D j, .6 L r1 to a M~ rI m to L O C r1 :6 9 Z O O In > U7 C 3 3 7~^ O C~ 3~ U Z 9 ~ O O Z W > >• a Ul ~ = r r C •C O U O ~ O {~} O ~ D e{r O O rl r1 err O O O O 'i yr O O ~ rl N yr O D O In N yr DD ~ ~ yr W i N N O ~ m Z O O ~ ~ ~ O O M O M r-I ~ O O O ,-I ,-I rl ~ O O ~ N W rl ~ O O ~ O N rl ~ O O ~ M lD rl yr O O ~ O 0~ rl yr O O L(7 ~ ,1 M err O O N n M M err W ~ ~ ~ ,~ N C ~ p 0 L X ~ > O O O O O O D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .. ~ O 0 0 fl. '0 M a o O O m ~ r~i M m D 9 L N U~ L L m O ~ •L U~1 ~ ~' U O Ill D O Ill N O OJ ~ O I~ M O 'i ~D O ~ N D N m m ~ i Uf N to N O ~ O O M l0 N ,1 O N ~ rb ,-I n O N ~ O N n N O ri m [0 N N N OJ O M i L~ N~ N ~>~ a y C 7 3 N Y N M •0 N m L C Z W ~ E O O rl N 'i Lr7 rl rl N O ~ O M N O Q ~ } } ~ ~ ~ ~ r-I W M r-I ~ ,-I Ill O I~ N ~ M O O tD O O Q } } O *~ ,_ '~ 07 07 N +' Y O o m !n 7 ~ ri E ~ `~ m N N N ~ > O ~ ~ et} et} et} yr yr yr yr "r r-I ar rl err rl err ,~ ter rl esr rl yr M yr M err M err m U] > a ~ (7 ~ '~ o 3 '-' ~ ~ L m ~ ~ ,~ 3 ~ ~ J 4J C _ L U ~ x ~ ~ ~ O ~ i ° W O O M I~ N rl ePr O O 117 n rl 'i ePr O O ~ O ~ rl ePr O O rl N M N ePr O O O O N IJl ePr D O M rl In l0 ePr D O ~ W In rl ePr UI ~ iL•' j ~ C i--i •6 L m 3 o 2 D ~ l0 N Vr N N } n N } ~ ~ i ~ O O L!) ~ ~ ~ ~ O O M ,-I rl I~ rl ar O O I~ tD I~ N rl ar O O O 0~ L~ O rl yr O O O M rl ~ M N yr O O M M rl T rl err O O ~ lD N 0~ N yr O O O lD I~ l0 M yr O O T 0~ O O ~ +1r O O O l0 ri I~ ~ +1r N ~ ~ ~ •0 C H ~ L m 3 0 2 I N } I N } p N i ~ N C O Z y N ~ j L 3 C m i' ~ a~ L ~_ 7 ~ 6- ~ ~ v ~ C ~ m •0 N a ~ In w O ~ 7 ~ L N ~ O w ° ~ N r1 O\ ~ N •0 N a ~ U] w O ~ ~ ~ L N ~ O w o _y ~ ~ 0_ ° c •ar u = ~ c c •ar u D1 C ,N z ~= ~~ ~~ E ar ~ ~ ° Y J o > 0 N 0 N 0 N o N n ~ n ~ n N n N n N E v ~ ~ o ~ ++ C Q a ~ _ O aU m?~ C ~ ~ a a~ ~ 7 N 3 Ul J ~ N /1 \ }m o N \ ~ 0 N \ w 0 N \ w o N \ o w ~ \ o w ~ } ~ ~ } ~ ~ } ~ ~ C ~ c to ~ L 7 N 3 ~ ~ U > > > > > o > L w E 3 u ~ w 'e d' Q Q Q Q Q Q > > > ° v ~ Ul W !] D ~ N ~ D ~ N ~ D ~ N ~ D ~ N ~ D ~ N ~ ~ N ~ O D W ~ ~ ~ N ~ UI to 2 m N ~ +~ C m ~ c m C ~ ~ O ~ ~ W ~ ~ Y o Y In Y o Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 Y 0 ~ ~ C ~ 7 c m C O N O N O N O N O N N rl D ~ •• L O L O N ~ ~ IL O Ul o Lf7 ,-I N N O M O In O M O In L~ I~ O ri Lr7 ,1 L N ~ L a ~ ,~ Q ,~ Q ,~ Q ,~ Q ,~ Q Q > N Q ~, L ° L ~ O In a~ E a_ >. ~ ~ 3 ~ Z (.7 ~ W ~ U' > (7 > U' > (7 > (7 > (7 > (7 > U' ~ U' ~ ~ L c E a ,. ~ ~ C ~ ~ o ~ In ~[ In Y o Y In '~ o O Y O ~ m ~ ~ L c Q ~~ 3 6 ~ ~ c ° •6 m Q ~ ~ = a Z a ~ 2 a 2 a 2 a 2 a 2 a 2 a 2 a 2 a 2 a U m w ° ~ c L ° c c ~ m rl 'i N Lf7 I~ 'i 'i 0 N C CZS L E r1 ~ M M M M M M M M M 0 of L E C N ~ ~ { / ) a' W a' W a' W a' W a' W a' W a' W m ~ ~ ~ U L ~~.+ L ' • N ~ 9 Vl Q ~ W W ~ ~ W ~ W ~ W ~ W ~ W ~ W a' W ~ W ~ W m ~ ~ L • • N ~ L E C 3 p ~ / li W g c G a' o c G a' 0 c G a' 0 c G a' 0 c G a' 0 c G a' 0 c G a' L ~ 0 L Ol a J ~O~L Q L N '~E O -6 ~ N C ~ = a l L a o Q = a c G ~ o c G ~ 0 c G ~ 0 c G ~ 0 c G ~ 0 c G ~ 0 c G a' 0 c G ~ 0 c G ~ L ~ 0 a L 41 ',E O '6 v N C ~ E O ~ ~ O ~ o ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W UI Z ~ O w ~ ~ L O O m ~+ v ~ ~~ ~ O ~ W L Z ~ Tm C m •c ~ 7 ~ ~ > N W J Ur Z W U1 z ~ I W W ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W UI Z ~ W UI Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W U1 Z ~ W Ul z ~ W Ul z ~ O w ~ ~ W >- Z O Ttn C m L L j ~ c > N In N ~ II a Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to E D i Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ Q O m v, ~~ • a ~ o 0 L ~ ti~ ~ t0 ~ ~ N N rl N ~ M ~ ~ ,-I O N N N N L!l N ~ ,~ D C W Z ~ Z ~ ~ ~ Z 0 0 ~ Q O C N ~ ~ L ~ N ~ ~ ~ c W D O O Lr7 O O D '•I O Lf7 rl O D N O L~ N D '•I O D D a a I J Q 0 a d I D W O D Q~ O L~ Q~ O D O r•I L~ N rl D M rl L~ M rl D ~ ri 117 ~ ri L r L C ~ ~ ~ h J o a ~0 O to w ~0 O to w ~0 O to w ~0 O to w ~0 O to w lD O to w lD O to w Q Z U W d ~ ~ Z t0 0~ Lf1 w ~ W to m lp D~ to w lp D~ to w lp 0~ to w lp 0~ to w tD C9 to m t0 C9 L!7 ~ t0 C9 Lr7 m 0 7~ ~~ Q Q D I N N N N N N N ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N ~mMO w ~ ~ ~L H ~ ~ ~ W W ~/) /` ~ ~ ~ ' rl N M ~ L~ lD I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ri N M ~ L~ l0 I~ Cwma o > > s:lour docurnentslnrdinancel4$ldme transformer purchase reaward.docx ~RDIl~ANE AN D~DINANE AMENDING ~RDIlVANE ~~a~~2~~ Q A T~ AWARD A ENE-TIME PURCHASE FDR OVERHEAD MOUNTED AND ~NDERCR~UND PAD DISTRIBUTION TRANSF~I~ERS F~~ DENTIN MUNICIPAL ELET~I; PRVIDINC~ FAR THE EXPENDITURE ~F FUNDS THEItEFD~; AND PI~~V7Dn~ AN EFFECTIVE DATE BID 38S~-ENE-TIME PURCHASE FDR ~VE~HEAD AND UNDERR~L~ND DITR.IBIJTI~N TRANSF~R~R.S AWARDED TD ~~~ DISTRIBI~TIDN n~ THE AM~LINT OF $77a,~4~, ~ T~ TEHLrNE, INS. TN '~ AMOUNT ~F $9,~7'~ FAR A TOTAL ATARD AMOUNT ~F ~~9,~~~} ~HE~EAS, on Navernber ~, 2a07 the pity council adopted Ordinance 2a07-~~~ accepting and approving, inter alga, the bid of TES Utility as ~~~ the lamest responsible bids for Items 1-7, 9-l~ and 1-17 of Bid SSA-Dne~Time; and ~IEREA, due to circumstances beyond the control of TES and FID Supply, the nest lov~est responsible bidder, and pity, neither TES nor HD Supply are able to comply v~ith ~ the terms of the said bid av~rd and supply the specified transformers at the prices bid; and ~EREAS, Tech~ine, Inc. and esca are able to comply nth the terms of the bid a~ad to supply the speciEed transformers at the prices bid; and HEI~EAS, The pity auncil has provided in the pity budget far the appropriation of funds to be used far the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies ar services approved and accepted herein; ND, THEREF~I~E, THE ~UNiL DF THE CITY ~F DENTDN HEREBY ~RDAIN~: ETON l . Section ~ of ordinance ~~~7-2~0, ~s hereby amended to read as fallow; The numbered items in the fvlloin numbered bids far materials, equipment, supplies, or services, sham in the "Bid Proposals" an f11e in the office of the pity Purchasing Agent, are hereby accepted ar~d approved as being the lamest responsible bids for such items: Item # Vendor A.ount 2-4 Techline}.Inc. ~ S,7~ I,5-7,9-1~ esca Distribution $70,84 . i +w s;lou~r d~cu~r~en~slordi~ancesl~~ldme ~rafarmer purc~iase reaward.doc~ ~~ ~, SBCTION ~. Ail other prav~sions of ordinance ~a7-~~~ shad. remain in full farce and effect, SECTZ~N 3. By the acceptance and ~prn~a~. of the above numbered items ~f the subn~tted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons subtt~n the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, ~.pplies or services accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and -for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. -e S~TI~N 4. Should the- Ci and a v~innin bidders} ash to enter iota a formal written a ee~.ent as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City ; f f f i ~ F 4 f ll~anager ar his designated representative ~s hereby authar~~ed to execute a mitten contact accordance .th the terms, canditio, specificatians~ standards, quantities and specified sums contained the Bid Proposal and related docuxaents and to e~teaad that contract as deter.tzed to be advantageous to the City of Denton. SBCTION . By the accceptnce a~.d apprava.l of the above enumerated bids, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of finds therefor in ~.e amount and in accordance v~ith the approved bids. SBCT~~N ~. This ordinance shall became effective immediately u~an its passage and approval. PASSBD AND APP~~vBD this day of ~~~8. PBPRY R. cN~ILL, MAYO ATTEST: ,TENN~'E~ A~TP~I~.S, CITY S~CR~TAI~Y .4fiY h APPR~vBD AS TO L~A~ FCVi. EDP . SN~YDER, CITY ATT~RN~Y BY: ~.. AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed DEPARTMENT: Materials Management to Emerson Vorel 349-8274 ACM: Jon Fortune SUBJECT Consider adoption of an Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Change Order One to the contract between the City of Denton and The Fain Group, Inc.; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing an effective date (Bid 3770- Cedar Street Improvements Change Order One in the amount of $197,744.64). BID INFORMATION This change order request is for the removal and replacement of street pavement material on Cedar Street between McKinney and Mulberry Streets. Currently Cedar Street is under construction to replace all sidewalks, lighting, water, wastewater, and storm water lines to bring the Streetscape area into compliance with ADA standards. The construction will also provide for beautification improvements and business enhancement opportunities. As construction crews have opened the street to replace public utilities, it has become apparent that the street pavement sub-base is non-existent and there are multiple layers of asphalt and concrete pavements. It is being recommended to remove and replace the aging existing street pavement layers with a new lime stabilized sub-base and 8" of asphalt driving surface for the long term street service of this project. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS) The City Council approved Bid 3770 Cedar Street Improvements (Ordinance 2007-135) on June 19, 2007 in the amount of $1,170,263 . RECOMMENDATION Approve Bid 3770 Change Order One in the amount of $197,744.64 for a total bid award of $1,368,007.64. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS The Fain Group, Inc. Fort Worth, TX Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT This project began in August 2007 and is expected to be completed in April 2008. The contractor has requested a 30-day extension due to the street paving included in this change order. FISCAL INFORMATION This change order will be funded from Economic Development account 300012445.1360.40100 in the amount of $157,744.64 and Street Paving account 360028443.1360.40100 in the amount of $40,000. FX~TTRTT~ Change Order One Itemization from The Fain Group, Inc. Respectfully submitted: ~~~ Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent 1-AIS-Bid 3770 Change Order One Exhibit 1 ~~E ~~DR 1 ~NTRAT REVI~~I~ ify of Benton, Texas owner Distributed to: owner 1 ! antracto~ 1 1 ~_ ~~~ ~77~ ~~ #~4~~~ khan ~ ~rde g r#1 Pro~ect:edar Street Streetsea a Utili re laeemrent Dated:l~~ 1? !'] ontraetar: The Fa~oup~__~n. ,~,~ontract Date: dune 19 ~~ ~7 ~rl.f. Box 7~ Fort worth T 7~~~1 This change ~rderlRevis~on nukes the followin chap es i~ thzs contr ~ ac#. Add: Rep~~eernent of Street fang and associated ex enses far cedar . P Street from cK~rrney Street to Mulberry t, See attached detail ~ 97 '~44,G4 The ~1 ~~LL~ ~,~~~R~rb u~~r.r.rraa..rr~/rr.rrr.usrr..urrr..f.r~.r;.rr.tur~;..r.r*r.fr^~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ let pane by prev~ous~ authorized change arder~.rr .................... 00 The ~~ontract Sum} prior tD this change order„....1.4i.ri.#....#....rl..i.r. 1 ~7a il~i ~0 The ~~ontract Sump will be ~~ncreased} by Phis than a ardc~...,..... X97 744 ~j i ~ ~ ~ .~4 The 'ew~ontract Sum} ~ncZuding this change order will be........ ~ ~ ~g 0 p ~y. . , 07.4 The a~Ll ~ ~~~, ~ b~, ~~~rr~~~~~~ b~rrrr^.*r.r*;.r~*tir~srr.~srr*...rl~ ~~~fllil ee~~ dA The date of substant~a~ completion as of the date of this change order therefore is r...r#•r,...r./,„r*,,,,,,,**r,r,*+„r„/„rr** Ma ~ Z008 Tl~e Fain group, Ind ... .- ontrctor has above} Cif f Denton ~,~ Dwner p,D. Box 7~ Address For Worth TX 76101 Si ture ~R~&~1~(Z .... _ Print Name 1 ~I~ 7l07 Date ~t -B Texas Street Address Denton T~ 7~20i S~na~ure Print Dame and Title Date ~:1rk~ckudWord Docsl~edu Street Project ~IesICHANGE ORDER Fain Group, Cedar Street CD#Z, ] 1-?-07,~ac Decennber I3, 2(307 ^ Mr. Robert Ticker ~~ ` City of Denton ~ 601 Hickory P.o. s~ Aso Dentazi, TX 76209 F«c w«n,. ~x ~s~o~ ~~~ 817-927-4,989 Fex ~: p Pav~.ng change Order .n,~gr,y.on~, overt, '~h~ cost to add " pad to cedar Street based on ~ ri r • ~c ed drawings from ebricke~, Ral~~s and Associates . rece~veci via erna~ on December ~ U, ~0~7 ~ One Hundred H~ `our and 41~ D c°ty-~cven ~'hous~d seven Hundred ~o ~ dollars { ~ ~7,7'~4.~4~. Teo cosh breakdown for .. ~Y t~s add~~an ~s as fo~Iaws: ~N~RET~ DES ~AEI~ ON ~Mf~~ N~1~C~D USA COLLE TOR escri Quan ' Units ni~los~ Total . . ll~~ll As >~aitlConcrte Davin 8~~8" must stQ ~f rear e1nuntered ' 33308 F Addi~ vnat move' for t~iif ing based on doing ^nc btocfc a~ a time anerete 8" ea halt s~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~zs8 ~ Additiv~ai move- ~~~ a~ h~~# loosed nr~ doing ore bock ~# ~ Mme 3338 ~ F or~erete~As halt rernova! at lnt~rsections to receive concrete " 8~ ~ ea Y ~ Lirr~e Treated u rode 4059 ~ 2t1N C~ng ~~ t~ $" lhlV~C Additional Move-ins for Mme 8tabifixataon rr L~ urve 'n ~ e~ ~.~ wk edit far Base Bid work ~ ea ~O.G3 ~Ot984.04 ~~.ao ~~,~.~o ~J.I U r~~~L~O.~~ ~1,33~.0D ~,~.00 ~ fi.6d ~ 3t4?8.40 ~.o'~ 4~4~~r~ ~~~ 1~~~~~ ~rlr V ~~5.00 ~,~ X0.00 $3,894.00_ ~,98~ .OQ ~8,T9~.D0 ~ 70,~83.0~ ubfotat $~84,4~~.5 Prot ~~.00°l0 5,~~3.'l 6 Band ~.DO°I~ $4,08.19 Taial $197'.744.fi~ This price includes the cost of milling for asphalt areas, ranoval of concrete/asphaltfor tlreareas with new concrete paving at the intersections of Oak, Hickory and McKinney, 6" of lime treatment on existinE sort, an estimated quantity of 1000 LF for saw cutting paving up to 8"thick where required and additional mobilizations for asphalt paving, milling operation and lime treatmeot based on completing one block at a time. This price does not include the following: any utility adjustments for underground utilities that are in conflict with lime operation or within the new 8" depth of paving or any utility adjustment required if the final top of paving elevation has changed from the base bid top ofpaving elevation, any fill material required due to rmsuitable soils or for revised elevations that wr7l require fill material, lime treatment under c:orb and gutter, concrete removal due to encountering rebaz in the milling process before reaching 8" in depth In addition to the cost above this change wr11 require Thirty (30) working days added to the contract time based on approval no later than January 11, 2008. Please feel to call me at 817-927-4388 with any questions or concerns. Thanks, r ~~~ Jpes CC: File ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~ _~~~ ~ :~ F ~~ •a ~ If ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ ' ' fr r i ~tiOiA ~ tix ~ ~ ~~~A ~~11Yii .J 'iy { ~~4i7w r{ 1 ~' ~ ~~ e.~ . i l '7 } f~+ ~y~ LL ~ ~ ~ I Ijl J ~ ~ 4~~ ~ ~ iF~ W ~ ..' 01~ ~ ~: ~ ° `~ ~ j ~~ ,~~' ~ ~~~ ~~~~ I ~ ~ ~ { } s ~F I '~~ ~, 1 ~~ ... - ,~,~ 4 ~f {~ . ..: `;~ - - ~ tai .; ,, ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ `• ~ ,a ~.~ ~, ~ i. ~: ~ ~ f' _: ~, ;~; ~ ~~# ~~ ; .. i ~~' ~ 14xx ~~ 4~~~E I ~.~ ~~; ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~; ~ ~ ~~ i :' i~ .-~..... - ~ f'-~_ ~ i C ~~ i ~ i ~i `~~ I ~ ~ ~~ x V 4~'~ t4r~~,' L .. 1~ '` 'l ~~~ ~ ~. { ~ 1 ,f 1 ji-~ ~ :~ ~ I 1 ~ • : !~ ;I i :i ~ ~ ~~ I~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~,.. 4 ~ ~ ` ' 1 ~ } ., `~ i~ sS I ~~ I ~ f~r`j 4 1 I `~ ~ ;~f~ I ~, '+r ` ~. ~ _ ~ r - 11~ 1f~ l ~'-' ~-k ;:~ s ~f .W =., '' --- 1 ~ 8 M ~~''~~ rl '• ~ ~ i 0 ~` .! b ~ i ~ i .f ~ '~' r ~~ f ~~ i~;~ ~i ~ -.3 . ~. { ~~ - ~~ + 'r ~ ~ F ~ ~.~ , * ~ ~ ~F. ~ # 'r ~' k ~ 7 ;~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~' ~ ~ ~`` ~ '~ ~>/ .~ ': ~~ ;~ l ~ E ~ r ~~ ~~ ~ ~~. ~~ I ` r ^~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ .~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ii } i r t~~ y ~ ~ I ' ~ r, ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ,. ~~ - ~..;o~.F # ~~ib r `~ ~ ~ ' l~ 'I #a7sii• • ~ ~, i ,i ~ .. r l.. ~ ~' *~~ ~ ~ .. ~ it ~ ~~ ~ r~ R `y I ~ i t !"" ~ ! ' ~ ~ ~- ~, ~ ~ E ~~ ~i.l f ~~ ' ~ . I ; {~ M ~~~; ~I ,~ ~/1017N i ~ ~~ *MJiM ~lpy1~ ~i `'~•1 iti07w11 ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER ONE TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE FAIN GROUP, INC.; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (BID 3770-CEDAR STREET IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER ONE IN THE AMOUNT OF $197,744.64). WHEREAS, on June 19, 2007 byOrdinance No.2007-13 5, the City awarded a public works contract to the Fain Group, Inc. in the amount of $1,170,263 for Cedar Street Improvements; WHEREAS, the Staff having recommended, and the City Manager having recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to amend such contract agreement with respect to the scope of work and an increase in the payment amount, and said change order fees under the proposed contract are fair and reasonable and are consistent with and not higher than the recommended practices and fees published by the professional associations applicable to the Provider's profession and such fees do not exceed the maximum provided by law; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Change Order No. One, increasing the amount of the contract between the City and The Fain Group, Inc., which is on file in the office of the Purchasing Agent, in the amount of One Hundred Ninety Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Forty Four and 64/100 ($197,744.64) Dollars, is hereby approved and the expenditure of funds therefor is hereby authorized in accordance with said change order. The total purchase order amount increases to $1,368,007.64. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2008. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: BY: 3-ORD-Bid 3770 Change Order One AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Materials Management ACM: Jon Fortune Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed to Phil Williams 349-8459 ~TIR.TF,CT Consider adoption of an Ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a purchase order through the Lower Colorado River Authority for the acquisition of 69kV and 13 8kV circuit breakers for Denton Municipal Electric by way of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Denton; and providing an effective date (File 3623- Interlocal Agreement for the Purchase of Circuit Breakers for Denton Municipal Electric awarded to Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution in the amount of $347,390). The Public Utilities Board recommends approval (6-0). FILE INFORMATION This item is for the purchase of five 13 BkVcircuit breakers and three 69kV circuit breakers for Denton Municipal Electric (DME) through an Interlocal agreement with the Lower Colorado River Authority. A complete description of the use of these circuit breakers is included in the attached Public Utilities Board (PUB) agenda information sheet (Exhibit 1). The PUB actually approved the purchase of two 69kV circuit breakers, but since that time the need for an additional breaker has been determined by DME. The price quotation from Seemens Power Transmission and Distribution is included as Exhibit 2. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEVV (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS) The Public Utilities Board approved this item at its December 10, 2007 meeting. Clty Council approved an Interlocal agreement with the Lower Colorado River Authority on December 12, 2006 (Ordinance 2006-134). RECOMMENDATION Award to Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution in the amount of $245,585 for five 138 kV breakers and $101,805 for three 69kV breakers for a total award of $347,390. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution Owasso, OK Agenda Information sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The circuit breakers will be ordered upon Council approval. Estimated delivery is sixteen weeks from receipt of an order. FISCAL INFORMATION The purchase of the circuit breakers will be funded from the following accounts: 600128492.1350.3530 $ 67,870 602099494.1350.3530 $ 33,935 602153494.1350.3530 $147,351 600005488.1350.3530 $ 98,234 $347,390 Requisitions numbers 85285, 85293, 85294, 85295 have been entered in the purchasing software system. F,XHTRTT~ 1. Public Utilities Board Agenda Information Sheet 2. Price Quotation from Siemens Respectfully submitted: ~~~ Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent 1-AIS-File 3623 Exhibit 1 PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD AGENDA ITEM #4 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: December 10, 2007 DEPARTMENT: DME ACM: Howard Martin, 349-8232 ~T IR.TF,CT Consider recommending an ordinance accepting competitive bids by way of an Interlocal Cooperative Purchasing Program Participation Agreement with the Lower Colorado River Authority ("LCRA") under Section 271.102 of the Texas Local Government Code, for the purchase of 13 8kV and 69kV circuit breakers; and providing for the expenditure of funds therefor (File 3623-Interlocal Agreement for the purchase of circuit breakers with LCRA awarded to Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution, Inc. ("Siemens"), in the amount of $313,455). BACKGROUND: Denton Municipal Electric (DME) has several substation proj ects in the approved CIP that require purchase of 13 8kV and 69kV circuit breakers. At this time, two 69kV circuit breakers are needed for the Hickory Substation; three 13 8kV circuit breakers are needed for the Jim Christal Substation; one 13 8kV breaker is needed for the R. D. Wells Interchange; and one 13 8kV breaker is needed for a spare. Pictures of Siemens 69kV and 13 8kV breakers are included on the following page. The City Council approved an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the Lower Colorado River on December 12, 2006 (Ordinance 2006-334). The Interlocal Cooperation Agreement is a mechanism whereby the city can participate in LCRA's competitively bid alliance agreements for purchase of electrical and other products. LCRA has an existing purchase agreement in place with Siemens for 69kV and 138kV circuit breakers. DME proposes to obtain the needed circuit breakers through this Interlocal agreement. The Interlocal agreement stipulates that each participating agency arrange the specific purchases and issue purchase orders directly to vendors. Because of the volatility in the market, the LCRA agreement contains a mechanism whereby prices maybe adjusted periodically. The Siemens pricing to LCRA is due to be reviewed in February with the likely result that the prices will increase by some amount. AI S -PUB Agenda Item #4 December 10, 2007 Page 2 of 3 ushing Current Transformers Operating [echanism and ~ntrol Cabinets DME obtained the LCRA prices and the technical information for the circuit breakers and evaluated their suitability for application in local projects. Only minor adaptations in the control and indication features will be necessary to make the circuit breakers compatible with the protection, control, and indication schemes that DME uses. The 138kV circuit breakers will require the addition of lights, switches, and wiring in the control cabinet at a cost of $2,422 per breaker. The 69kV breaker adaptation will require the addition of lights, switches, and wiring in the control cabinet and removal of six bushing current transformers. The effect of these changes is to lower the price of the 69kV breakers by $3,525 per breaker. With these changes, DME's unit price for 13 8kV breakers will be $49,117, and the unit price for 69kV breakers will be $33,935 based on applying the cost for the changes to LCRA's bid price. A quotation from Siemens showing the LCRA price and the cost adjustments for the control and CT changes is attached as Exhibit 1. The cost for five 138kV breakers will be a total of $245,585. The cost for two 69kV breakers will be a total of $67,870. Byway of clarification, the quotation references 145kV and 72V circuit breakers. The nominal voltages for the transmission systems around Denton are 13 8kV and 69kV. There are national industry standards for maximum voltages that manufacturers must comply with for equipment that will operated at these system voltages. For 13 BkV, the maximum voltage rating must be 145kV and for 69kV, the maximum voltage rating must be 72kV. nPTInNS: 1. Recommend approval 2. Not recommend approval AI S -PUB Agenda Item #4 December 10, 2007 Page 3 of 3 RECOMMENDATION: DME recommends approval of the unit prices for purchase of circuit breakers from Siemens through the existing interagency agreement with LCRA. ESTIMATED SCHEDULE: The circuit breakers for R. D. Wells, Jim Christal, Hickory, one spare will be ordered upon approval by the City Council. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions): None by the PUB City Council approved the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with LCRA on December 12, 2006 (Ordinance 2006-334). FISCAL INFORMATION: The circuit breakers will be purchased using budgeted funds for specific proj ects. BID INFORMATION: The bids were administered by LCRA. DATE SCHEDULED FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL: January 8, 2008 EXHIBITS: 1. Quotation from Siemens Respectfully submitted, Sharon Mays General Manager Denton Municipal Electric Prepared by: f~: Chuck Sears Engineering Administrator Denton Municipal Electric Exhibit 2 IEI~IEN December 3, 2007 Karen Smith, Sr. Buyer City of Denton 901-B Texas Street Denton, TX 76209 RE: SPS Circuit Breaker pricing via LCRA Agreement Ms. Smith Per our previous communication the Lower Colorado River Authority currently has an ongoing agreement with Siemens to purchase our SPS circuit breakers. This agreement is changed as negotiated based upon the current needs of either party, and as you know, part of this agreement allows other entities such as the City of Denton to purchase at the LCRA pricing. From past purchases, and communication with your Engineering staff, we know the exact design changes necessary to match your technical preferences. We have determined the costs to slightly modify the LCRA design that you plan to purchase to meet Denton requirements. These costs are listed in the table below. City of Denton SPS Circuit Breaker Prices based upon LCRA Agreement LCRA price Design change to match Denton spec. Denton Price per LCRA Design wl Changes 145 KV $ 46,695.00 $ 2,422.00 $ 49,117.00 72 KV $ 37,460.00 $ (3, 525.00) $ 33, 935.00 This offer is valid to you through January 31, 2008. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. We look forward to working with you. Trey Little, Sales Agent for Siemens I Len T. Deloney LLC Cc: Ed Carter, Siemens Application Engineer ORDINANCE N0.2008- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE A PURCHASE ORDER THROUGH THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF 69KV AND 138KV CIRCUIT BREAKERS FOR DENTON MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC BY WAY OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF DENTON; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (FILE 3623-INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF CIRCUIT BREAKERS FOR DENTON MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC AWARDED TO SIEMENS POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $347,390). WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 2006, the City Council considered and approved an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (the "Agreement") with the Lower Colorado River Authority ("LCRA"), pursuant to the provisions of Texas Local Government Code, Section 271.102, by Ordinance No. 2006-334, that provided for the cooperative purchase of goods and services; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Interlocal Cooperation Agreement, the City desires to make purchases of 138kV and 69 kV electric circuit breakers; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City Manager, or his designee is hereby authorized to purchase five (5) 138 kV circuit breakers for the unit price of $49,117 each; and three (3) 69 kV circuit breakers for the unit price of $33,935 each, totaling $347,390 from Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution, Inc., the successful bidder pursuant to competitive bids received by the Lower Colorado River Authority in accordance with an Interlocal Cooperative Purchasing Program Participation Agreement under Section 271.102 of the Texas Local Government Code; which Agreement is on file in the office of the City of Denton Purchasing Agent. SECTION 2. The City Manager, or his designee is authorized to expend funds pursuant to the Agreement for the purchase of various goods and services. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2008. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: 3-ORD-File 3623 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 DRAFT MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD December 10, 2007 After determining that a quorum of the Public Utilities Board of the City of Denton, Texas was present, the Vice-Chair of the Public Utilities Board convened into an Open Meeting on Monday, December 10, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in the Service Center Training Room, City of Denton Service Center, 901-A Texas Street, Denton, Texas. Present: Vice Chair Dick Smith, Phil Gallivan, John Baines, Randy Robinson, Bill Grubbs and Bill Cheek (arrived at 9:13 a.m.). Absent: Chair Charldean Newell, excused Ex Officio Members: George C. Campbell, City Manager Howard Martin, ACM Utilities Vice Chair Dick Smith announced that a quorum was present and convened into a closed meeting at 9:00 a.m. to consider the following under the provisions of §551.086 of the Texas Government Code. CLOSED MEETING: [~ Before the Public Utilities Board ("PUB") may discuss, deliberate, vote, or take final action on each of the agenda items posted as a "competitive matter" in a Closed Meeting under the provisions of Texas Government Code §551.086(c) relating to "Public Power Utility" items, the Chair of the PUB shall first announce the time, and then the PUB must then vote and make a good faith determination, by a maj ority vote of its members, that if any particular agenda item listed under the "Closed Meeting" section is an electrical "competitive matter" that satisfies the requirements of §551.086(b)(3). If there is more than one "competitive matter" item on the PUB agenda, then a separate vote must be taken for each item. The vote shall be taken during the Closed Meeting and shall be included in the certified agenda or tape recording of the Closed Meeting. If the PUB fails to determine by a majority vote of its members that the particular agenda item satisfies the requirements of §551.086(b)(3), then the PUB may not discuss, deliberate or take any further action on that Agenda item in its Closed Meeting. For any agenda item listed under any other section of the Texas Government Code, other than §551.086, consideration in the Closed Meeting is permitted without the necessity of a preliminary motion and a vote of the Board being taken.] A. CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY --- Under Texas Government Code §551.071; and DELIBERATIONS REGARDING REAL PROPERTY ---Under Texas Government Code §551.072; 1. Discussion, deliberate, and receive information from Staff, and provide Staff with direction peNtaining to the puNChase price of, the possible teNms of sale of, and valuation issues respecting the acquisition of an approximate 0.278 ache permanent water easement; and an approximate 0.197 acre temporary construction easement, both located in the Asa Hickman SuNVey, AbstNact No. 521 in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being located along the north side of Roselawn Drive. Draft Minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting December 10, 2007 2of7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Consultation with the City's attorneys regarding legal issues associated with the necessary easement acquisition for the above easements, where a public discussion of these legal matters would conflict with the duty of the City's attorneys to the City Council under the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Conduct of the State Bar of Texas, or would jeopardize the City's legal position in any administNative pNOCeedings or potential litigation involving said real propeNty. (Roselawn Drive WateN Line Project) B. Deliberations Regarding Certain Public Power Utilities: Competitive Matters --- UnderTexas Government Code §551.086. 1. Receive competitive public power information and financial documentation from Staff in the form of the Denton Municipal Electric ("DME ") Executive Summary together with the October 2007 DME Budget versus Actual Revenues, Expenses, and Commodity Volumes; and discuss, delibeNate, consideN, and pNOVide Staff with direction regarding such matters. 2. Receive competitive electric information, including financial information from staff pertaining to Denton Municipal Electric ("DME ") electric service rate issues and strategies, including without limitation, the Second quarter FY 2008 Energy Cost Adjustment ("ECA ") and Renewable Cost Adjustment ("RCA ") rates and other related matters; and discuss, deliberate, consider, determine policy, and provide Staff with direction regarding such matters. At 9:24 a.m. Vice Chair Smith declared the closed meeting ended and announced that the Public Utilities Board was thereafter in open session. OPEN MEETING: CONSENT AGENDA: The Public Utilities Board has received background information, staff's recommendations, and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration. Vice Chair Smith pulled Item 5 for Individual Consideration. 1) Consider recommending adoption of an ordinance declaring that a public necessity exists and finding that public welfare and convenience requires the taking and acquiring of an approximate 0.278 acre permanent water easement and an approximate 0.197 acre temporary construction easement, both located in the Asa Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521 and both being within a parcel of land conveyed to Lee Anne Todd by deed recorded as Document Number 94-R0001091 in the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas; authorizing the City Attorney, or his designee, to acquire the easements through agreement or eminent domain; and providing an effective date. 2) Consider recommending adoption of an Ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a public works contract for the construction of Morse Street Channel Improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing an effective date (Bid 3847- Draft Minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting December 10, 2007 3 of 7 1 Morse Street Channel Improvements awarded to Laughley Bridge and Construction, Inc. in 2 the amount of $1,049,766). 3 4 3) Consider recommending approval of a water line oversize participation agreement between 5 the City of Denton and Robson Denton Development L.P., for an amount not to exceed 6 $247,308.26. 7 8 4) Consider recommending an ordinance accepting competitive bids by way of an Interlocal 9 Cooperative Purchasing Program Participation Agreement with the Lower Colorado River 10 Authority ("LCRA") under Section 271.102 of the Texas Local Government Code, for the 11 purchase of 13 8kV and 69kV circuit breakers; and providing for the expenditure of funds 12 therefor (File 3623-Interlocal Agreement for the purchase of circuit breakers with LCRA 13 awarded to Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution, Inc. ("Siemens"), in the amount of 14 $313,455). 15 16 Board Member Phil Gallivan moved to approve Items 1 through 4 with a second from 17 Board Member Bill Cheek. The motion was approved by a 6-0 vote. 18 19 ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION: 20 21 5) Consider approval of Task Order 07-F, ERGOT Monitoring, of the Professional Services 22 Agreement Between the City of Denton and R. J. Covington Consulting, LLC (RJC) for an 23 amount not to exceed $20,000. 24 25 Vice Chair Smith questioned why, with an outstanding balance of $30,000 available, staff is 26 recommending a $20,000 increase. Sharon Mays, General Manager, DME, replied that staff has 27 limited expertise in ERGOT related issues and she is doing this prior to her leaving because the 28 ACM and Interim General Manager will need more support and advice regarding ERGOT issues 29 and adding an additional $20,000 will make that support available. Smith asked why the 30 $30,000 was not enough and if not, what procedure would take place when it is determined that 31 it is not enough. Mays replied she doubted the $30,000 would be enough given that there are a 32 number of important activities occurring at ERGOT at this time and that the procedure for adding 33 the additional $20,000 later on would require agenda items for PUB and City Council which 34 could make it a lengthy process. 35 36 Board Member Gallivan questioned how long the $30,000 would last. Mays replied that 37 depended on what happens. At this time activities could go increase depending upon changes 3 8 made to software which will require monitoring in key areas of the process. 39 40 Vice Chair Smith commented that Professional Services Agreements had always been kind of a 41 sticky issue since he has been on the Board and it seems that the Board just rubber stamps 42 everyone one of them and he is concerned that is not the right way to do it. 43 44 Board Member Gallivan asked if there was a maturity of the agreement and does it renew every 45 year. Mays replied there was no automatic renewal, but if something happens at ERGOT and 46 staff does not have approval to get somebody to monitor it, it could take four sometimes six 47 weeks to get Council approval. Draft Minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting December 10, 2007 4of7 2 Vice Chair commented that the City has used Covington for 11 years, and he believed they 3 would continue to provide services to city until additional funds were approved. Mays replied 4 that was correct, but she has to warn them every single time that she does not have the authority 5 to commit approval of that money, so they are always running the risk that the policy makers will 6 not approve the additional monies needed. 7 8 Board Member Gallivan moved to approve with a second from Board Member John 9 Baines. The motion was approved by a 5-1 vote with Vice Chair Smith casting the 10 opposing vote. 11 12 6) Consider recommending approval of the Public Utilities Board meeting minutes of: 13 a. November 12, 2007 14 15 The minutes were approved as circulated. 16 17 7) Present a summary of City Accounting System Review completed by R.J. Covington 18 Consulting, LLC. 19 20 Howard Martin, ACM, called on Phil Williams, DME Finance and Accounting Manager, to 21 present. Williams provided a summary of the review which was approved by the PUB last year. 22 Williams noted that once additional staff was in place the review began earlier this year. The 23 report has been reviewed with the Finance Director and other City Management and all are in 24 agreement on how to proceed. 25 26 The report is important because in the late 1990's Texas PUC began regulating and setting rates 27 for transmission services for all electric utilities. The Transmission Cost of Service filings 28 require information to be presented by the FERC Uniform System of Accounts and, based on 29 DME's last TCOS filing, DME earns 28% on transmission system investments. Williams stated 30 that the main issues identified with the study were Fixed Asset Accounting and the need to 31 ensure that assets are booked in the correct FERC account. Williams pointed out the 28% comes 32 from other utilities in the state and not from the citizens of Denton and so it is important revenue 3 3 to receive. 34 35 The second item addressed timely reporting of financial results. Staff needs to provide reports to 36 management and PUB on a regular basis, and to record all entries throughout the year so that 3 7 management can monitor performance. 38 39 A review of Fixed Assets Accounting explained that fixed assets accounting is currently done on 40 Excel spreadsheets at year end with the information downloaded from the Oracle accounting 41 system. Additions, retirements, work-in-progress, capitalized interest, and depreciation are 42 calculated on spreadsheets. Williams stated that for fixed asset accounting this is not where we 43 want to be but there have been improvements and more improvements are planned. 44 45 In reviewing the DME asset list, Williams noted that few items needed to be written off, and that 46 a few items were found that should have been depreciated and some that should not have been. Draft Minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting December 10, 2007 5 of 7 1 After adjustments, the net adjustment of $271 thousand to the total Net Book Value of $83 2 million was made. 3 4 The review of FERC accounting found $1.3 million of assets in inappropriate FERC accounts 5 which translated to about a $110,000 annual impact on TCOS revenue; and as a result, the 6 Engineering Manager started reviewing transmission jobs in detail and the Finance and 7 Accounting Manager will review FERC accounting for all fixed assets during the year. 8 Improvement measures to be put in place will address the need to improve capitalization of 9 equipment, engineering overhead, administrative time off and administrative overhead. Also, 10 there will be a close out of jobs periodically during the year instead of just at year end and more 11 recording entries will be made during the year. 12 13 Williams stated that to continue to get better staff will: 14 • Start using the Oracle Fixed Asset module instead of spreadsheets 15 • Talk to other cities that have an electric utility and are using Oracle accounting software, 16 • Arrange for an Oracle consultant to provide training 17 • Create methodology for capitalizing equipment and overhead items. 18 19 In addition, there will be more frequent review accounting reports listed by FERC account 20 during the year and plans to make improvements to time reporting software will result in better 21 accounting for labor and equipment charges. Staff will also study how to improve issues related 22 to warehouse operations. 23 24 Williams stated that in conclusion staff has made significant progress in improving accounting 25 processes and that more improvement is in progress. 26 27 Vice Chair Smith asked about the actual report from Covington stating he would like for the 28 Board to receive the Executive Summary as well as the report. Mays replied staff would email 29 those documents today and suggested that the Board also receive the response from the Finance 30 Department. 31 32 8) Receive a presentation providing summary information of a citizen's survey completed by 33 the Survey Research Center at the University of North Texas (UNT), on the City of Denton's 34 Trash and Recycling Collections Programs, September 2007, and the North Central Texas 35 Council of Governments Regional Recycling Rate Benchmarking Study, September 2007. 36 37 Howard Martin, ACM, pulled this item stating that due to the absence of the Recycling 3 8 Manager, it would be considered during the January meeting. 39 40 9) Consider approval of a First Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement with 41 Solutient GeoSciences, Inc. to provide investigative groundwater monitoring services at the 42 city's landfill in the additional amount of $89,606.75, authorizing the expenditure of funds 43 therefor; and providing an effective date. 44 45 Martin called on Vance Kemler, Director of Solid Waste, to present. Kemler stated that as 46 background for this item, landfill staff conducts ground water and gas monitoring and testing. 47 The ground water program calls for testing of a series of perimeter monitoring wells around the Draft Minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting December 10, 2007 6of7 1 landfill and that on one particular well, about one and one-half years ago, testing detected a 2 landfill gas presence in an under drain of an old dewatering device installed when the landfill 3 was constructed. Gas had intruded into that area. When the landfill gas came into contact with 4 water, that water can pickup volatile organic carbons and when that gas was detected there was a 5 slight increase in the presence of a volatile organic carbon compound, about 5 parts per billion, 6 really small. Over time, based on federal and state requirements, this is a statistical significant 7 increase and at that point, staff should begin further monitoring and expanding the testing to 8 determine exactly what there is in that area ground water monitoring well. Staff believes it is 9 associated with the presence of landfill gas from about a year and one half ago and is not 10 associated with a release from the landfill itself. Today, staff is seeking authorization to add 11 three wells, one to determine if there is some flume or contamination or presence of that volatile 12 organic carbon further away from out monitoring well. A well will be placed to find out where 13 or if that material is present. A third well can detect any of that volatile organic material away 14 from the landfill. Staff would like to get the process started as promptly as possible, and if there 15 is a problem, move forward, based on findings, with corrective action. 16 17 Gallivan stated he was under the impression that the regulators are tracking this now and are not 18 too concerned about it. Kemler, they are concerned, but once the regulatory agency was notified, 19 a letter was received stating an assessment determination needs to be undertaken. 20 21 Board Member Cheek moved to approve with a second from Board Member Robinson. 22 The motion was approved by a 6-0 vote. 23 24 10) ACM Update: 25 a) Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste September Financials 26 27 Vice Chair Smith stated he would like to confirm that beginning next year, drainage fees revenue 28 would be broken out separate from these budgets showing drainage fee revenue as well as the 29 allocated expenses to that revenue. Martin replied that it is done now and kept separate so one 30 call tell drainage fee revenues under wastewater, but if the Board wants specific drainage 31 expense, that can be broken out. Smith replied they want to see, whether it is broken out in a line 32 item in the budget or detailed in separate spreadsheet, in detail, actual revenue and all expenses 33 against that revenue. Martin asked if he wanted to see if for this fiscal year. Smith replied if it is 34 easy to print out yes. 35 36 Board Member Baines asked about the $8 million dollar swing in the bottom line on page 94 in 37 prior year and current year and how it is handled. Martin replied it was covered through the use 3 8 of reserve funds. Martin stated that last year was a good year in terms of it being hot and dry 39 which created revenues that added to the reserve level. That allows flexibility, when there is a 40 not so good year and a lot of rainfall, and staff does not have to alter rates to the customers. 41 Baines asked if staff anticipated at win year. Martin replied staff always budgets on what is 42 called a normal year. 43 44 b) 4th Quarter CIP Report for Water, Wastewater & Solid Waste 45 Draft Minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting December 10, 2007 7of7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 11) New Business -This item provides an opportunity for Public Utilities Board members to suggest items for future agendas or to request information from the Assistant City Manager or uture meetings. Board Member Grubbs asked for a biodiesel update. Kemler replied that had been no change since the Board meeting in November. 12) Official Action, if necessary, on Closed Meeting item(s) under §§551.071-551.088 of the Texas Government Code, as amended. There was no continuation of a closed meeting item. The meeting was adj ourned by consensus at 10:15 .m. AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed DEPARTMENT: Materials Management to Roy Minter, Jr. 349-7925 ACM: Jon Fortune SUBJECT Consider adoption of an Ordinance accepting competitive bids by way of an Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County and awarding a contract for the purchase of nine police sedans; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing an effective date (File 3 946- Interlocal Agreement for Police Sedans with Tarrant County, contract awarded to Philpott Ford Inc. in the amount of $205,884). FILE INFORMATION An Interlocal Agreement for Cooperative Purchasing was approved on June 16, 1998 with Tarrant County allowing the City of Denton to participate in Tarrant County contracts for the supply of goods and services. The City of Denton j Dined a Metroplex Regional Co-op for the purchase of Police Sedans headed by Tarrant County with the intention of pooling our buying power. Approximately one hundred fifty-seven governmental entities including twenty-seven counties, seventy-nine cities, twenty- one school districts, four universities and twenty-six special districts combined to purchase approximately 2,300 vehicles for the 2007-2008 contract. Bids were solicited from 41 qualified vendors and five responded. These prices are below current State of Texas contract and Houston Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC) prices for similar vehicles. This acquisition is for the purchase of nine police patrol sedans. The units will replace similar 2000 and 2001-year model units no longer suitable for police activities. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS) The City Council approved an Interlocal Agreement with Tarrant County on June 16, 1998 (98- 175). Tarrant County Commissioners Court approved the 2007-008 bids and awarded a contract to Philpott Ford on October 2, 2007 (Bid No. 2007-190). RECOMMENDATION Award to Philpott Ford Inc. in the amount of $22,876 each for a total amount of $205,884 for nine police patrol sedans. Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Philpott Ford, Inc. Nederland, TX ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The estimated delivery of the vehicles is approximately 60-90 days. FISCAL INFORMATION This acquisition will be funded from bond account 810007458.1355.30100. EXHIBITS Exhibit l :Quote from Philpott Ford Inc. with Tarrant County Pricing Exhibit 2: Price Sheet with Selected Options Respectfully submitted: ~~~ Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent 1-AIS-File 3946 EXHIBIT 1 CUSTOIVII~ED ~ROD~UCT PR.I~IN~ ~I~MIVIAR~ ~A~~D ON CO1~TnACT 1~OLtCC VE[~Y+C~,ES TARRANT COUNTY STA~'EW1DE CONTR~CTI2008 End User: Ci af' I~entc~n h# 940 349 7342. philpott l~ep:1JMME't'T~, CONE Contact: Tom Shaw fa.Y# 940 349 7 t 58 Date: I6-Dcc-07 product 1~esCrNptjon; _p~licc intcrcGptor A. Bid Series; ",~,"' revised 1Z~19-2Q07 A. Base Yrice: $ 1~.~7~,UU B. published Options Iltemize each hel[iwl Code O lions Bid Price Cada Options Bid Price 2008 P71 olive u~terce for ~~4~ radio, ~-wa~- ro wirc ~ ~7,pQ owzr ~vicldows, I~cks, mirrors POLICE HUB CAPS 4.6L VS tYex tuel FFv ei~ ine r~ew white exterior W'!, cloth front bucket for 200$ ~r.~t~, vii~y) rr.~r iN ch:~rc~,~l ~irG rc~surc monitarin~ systenti 425 50 strafe crni5sien~ ~ySL'em ilea front dour bQQ S~detnl0 ShnSt~lled ~ ZIi,UU 5yM side air ba~sldriver~ assenger ~ ?6U.UU ~IH clet;klid rclcasc on doorlign powered $ ~S.UU 47$ il~terior courtes ino erative $ 10,00 ~~AC'l'Olt4' pRD~;R UN 1T~ 1 a driYCr side s atlight ~ 1 ~G,Qa DELI1r'EPi~' APP3~ 120-1$U I)A'~"S 67R ino er~CivG rr~r hKndlcs ~ 12.OU ARO 80 rood wiri~ r7o hole in 4cnCcr of roof ~ 40~D0 1d'1~ Pord "K~vtar" trunk ask $ 15~~00 948 rear windows ino cr<<tivc $ l3.UU 'Total of B. Published Options: S 7S6.UU C. ~nnublished Options I ltemi2e eflch below. trot to e~ccEed Z5°!o f ~_ 'I ll_2 O iia~~~ Bid Prig O iiu~i~ Bid Yricc horn, siren, whin ~ re ~ 65,D0 ~~o Rhino lront push burnpcr #SD3$ $ 355~OD S3M radira sup ressioi~lbandin stra s ~ 95.UU TOM, NOTE Tire Pagel is ~d~~itio~~l east TARRA~IT COUT]TY JOINT inEtsllad is !~S~S.UU~'~~'~ !~ ~95.U0 COO!'ERA"l,1VE/JUIN'C V~N1'l1R~E OC Hahn sySlCm is additional cost o~'~?69,50 $ 7b9,5D POLICE PACKAGE VEHICLES installed. ~E~i1CLES 1~'H NQ. 2UU7~ 19U whin ~~ 4l~nt~U1~ $ 15~4.SU ~'ou ma have a~7 interest that cif ~ of Carrollton rn~. uest ~ni1a ~~ 371 mi1G5 a; ~ 1.00 mile puts both s}-st~ins on t1~~ lnterce tors Total of C. Unpublishdd Options: S 2,07.00 D. Contract pttice Ad j ustment: E- aeoirrer~ Charges: S 37.00 F. rl'otal of A * B + C + Il + E - S 22,$7b.U0 ~. Quantity Ordered ~ x F ® ~ X05,854.00 ^uurrrr~iri.rrrr-i ~. ~~ 1'. Nan-Equip Charges c~ Credits Z8 ~J~d ~NO~ ~11~~~J4~~~ 6~5Z6Zti~Z8 ~Z tie ~0~~;~'6Zr~Z~ EXHIBIT 2 BASE PRICE X19,675.00 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor P-71 4 Door Sedan Vibrant white/Charcoal Gray Interior Options not included in Base Price: Order Description Code Price License plate bracket, front Standard No Charge Moldings, color keyed bodyside, front installed Code 96A $ 28.00 Audio AM/FM radio Standard No Charge Decklid release Code 61 H $ 25.00 Lamp, courtesy disable Code 478 $ 10.00 Spot Light, driver side Code 51 A $156.00 Rear door locks/handles inop Code 67R $ 12.00 Roof wiring no hole in roof Code 65A $ 40.00 Trunk Pack Code 14T $185.00 windows rear power delete Code 948 $ 13.00 Horn, siren, wiring, prep Code 172 $ 65.00 Radio, 2 way pre wire Code 946 $ 27.00 Radio suppression package Code 53M $ 95.00 Cloth front buckets, vinyl rear Standard $ 0.00 Brakes, anti-lock system Standard $ 0.00 Floor covering, rubber Standard $ 0.00 Power windows Standard $ 0.00 EXHIBIT 2 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor P-71 Page 2 Wiring Conduit Code 117 Seat Side Airbags Code 59M Front Push Bumper Fire Panel Haylon 911 System Price Per Vehicle Including Options Destination Charge Total Price Per Vehicle Go Rhino 503 8 $194.50 $ 260.00 $ 355.00 $595.00 $769.50 X22,505 $ 371.00 ~ 22,876 Total Award X205,884 ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS BY WAY OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH TARRANT COUNTY AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF NINE POLICE SEDANS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (FILE 3946-INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR POLICE SEDANS WITH TARRANT COUNTY, CONTRACT AWARDED TO PHILPOTT FORD INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $205,884. WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance 95-175, Tarrant County, Texas has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedure of state law on behalf of the City of Denton; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described materials, equipment, supplies or services can be purchased by the City through the Tarrant County Cooperative Purchasing programs at less cost than the City would expend if bidding these items individually; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The numbered items in the following numbered purchase order for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "File Number" listed hereon, and on file in the office of the Purchasing Agent are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: FILE NT IlV1RF,R VFNnnR AMnT 1NT 3946 Philpott Ford Inc. $205,884 SECTION 2. By the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items set forth in the attached purchase orders, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids to Tarrant County for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the bid documents and related documents filed with Tarrant County (Bid 2001-125), and the purchase orders issued by the City. SECTION 3. Should the City and persons submitting approved and accepted items wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the City's ratification of bids awarded by the Tarrant County, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications and standards contained in the Proposal submitted to the Tarrant County, quantities and specified sums contained in the City's purchase orders, and related documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION 4. By the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items set forth, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approval purchase orders or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 2008. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: 3-ORD-FILE 3946 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2007 Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed DEPARTMENT: Materials Management to Frank Payne, P.E. 349-8946 ACM: Jon Fortune SUBJECT Consider adoption of an Ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a public works contract for the construction of Shady Oaks and Brinker Paving and Drainage Improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (Bid 3 897-Shady Oaks and Brinker Paving and Drainage Improvements awarded to JRJ Paving, L.P. in the amount of $2,884,059.98). BID INFORMATION The Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road projects were approved as part of the 2005 Blue Ribbon Bond election package. The purpose of the Shady Oaks Drive project was to provide access between existing Shady Oaks Drive extending east from Woodrow Lane to Loop 288 at Morse Street. The purpose of the Brinker Road project was to extend existing Brinker Road north from its intersection with Spencer Road to tie in with the new section of Shady Oaks Drive. The Brinker Road project was also intended to provide some relief for traffic along Loop 288 during the construction of that project. Although these two roadways were approved as separate projects in the bond election, for the purposes of design and bidding they were treated as a single job. Refer to Exhibit 1 for proj ect location. The City received bids on the referenced project on October 11, 2007. There were a total often bidders for the project; although, one bidder submitted an incomplete bid and was therefore determined to benon-responsive. The bids were structured in three basic bid configurations: All of Shady Oaks and Brinker, Shady Oaks by itself, and Shady Oaks and Brinker extended south to the north property line of American Legion Post No. 71. Affordability and budget limitations were the only reasons for structuring the bids in this manner. In addition to the three base bid options, there were three alternative bid items received: (1) Signal at the intersection of Spencer Road and Brinker Road; (2) Signal at the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road; and (3) 48" steel casing at the intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road. 1. The low bid for the first bid option listed (all of Shady Oaks and Brinker plus all three alternative bids) came in at $4,514,268.13 for asphalt paving and $4,677,949.68 for concrete paving. Adding in the engineering costs, cost to lower the gas lines through the American Legion property to accommodate the road profile, inspections, and testing results in a total projected cost of the project of approximately $6,000,000, which is just within the funding available for the project. Right-of way (ROW) costs across the American Legion property are not included in the total listed. Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 BID INFORMATION (CONTINUED) 2. The low bid for the second bid option listed (Shady Oaks alone plus the casing pipe at the intersection with Brinker Road) came in at $2,884,059.98 for asphalt paving and $3,087,551.30 for concrete paving. Adding in the engineering costs, inspections, and testing results in a total projected cost of the project of approximately $3,700,000 to $3,900,000, which is within the funding available for the project. 3. The low bid for the third bid option listed (Shady Oaks plus Brinker down to the north property line of the American Legion plus the casing pipe at the intersection with Brinker Road) came in at $3,544,753.22 for asphalt paving and $3,696,697 for concrete paving. Adding in the engineering costs, inspections, and testing results in a total projected cost of the project of approximately $4,200,000 to $4,400,000, which is also within the funding available to the project. City staff has been unable to come to terms with the American Legion on the value of the ROW across their property. An initial offer for the ROW was forwarded to the Legion at $346,650. The City received the appraisal for the American Legion Post No. 71 property in a letter from Jerry Romine dated June 5, 2007. The letter stated that the purchase of the ROW and temporary easement should be more in line with the appraised value ($500,644) than the offer tendered by the City. In light of budgetary concerns for the project, the City elected to proceed with design and bidding of the proj ect prior to responding to the letter from Mr. Romine. The cost to lower the two gas lines across the ROW for Brinker Road has been quoted at approximately $438,000. The signal at Brinker Road and Spencer Road was bid at approximately $200,000 depending on which bid is awarded. The roadway costs for this section of the project as bid can be shown to be the difference between the total project costs for the first and third options bid, or $1,600,000. These items total $2,238,000. The appraisal submitted from the American Legion showed an approximately $500,000 improvement to the value of the property by the construction of this roadway. All of these items translate to tangible improvements to the property in question. Along with the very real benefit the Legion will realize by the construction of Brinker Road, the costs to develop this property (at a minimum depending on use and traffic impacts the roadway component alone would include the construction of half the secondary arterial, a share in the signal at Spencer and the entire costs to relocate the gas line) are significantly decreased. In addition, a developer will expend funds for engineering, inspection and other project costs that will be absorbed by the City if the Brinker Road portion of the proj ect moved forward under the current bids. In light of this information and the fact that the entire ROW for the rest of Brinker Road has been donated outright or by plat, City staff sent a letter dated November 20, 2007 to the Legion asking them to consider the donation of the ROW for Brinker Road across the Legion property. The letter stated that without this consideration on the part of the American Legion, the City may well have to proceed with the construction of the project at a reduced scope. The letter also stated the opinion that the positive impacts to the marketability and eventual development of the Legion's property far outweighed the income that could be derived from the ROW needed for Brinker Road. Staff met with representatives from American Legion Post No. 71 to discuss this Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 3 BID INFORMATION (CONTINUED) letter and the bids received on December 4, 2007. At that meeting, staff was advised that the Legion had no intention of developing the property or selling it for the purposes of development, that the Legion would not consider the donation of ROW for the project, and that the amount they wanted from the City in exchange for the ROW was now $800,000. nPT1nN~ 1. Award Bid Option No. 1 (all of Shady Oaks and Brinker) with either asphalt or concrete paving and allocate additional funds to reimburse American Legion Post No. 71 for ROW across their property. 2. Award Bid Option No. 2 (Shady Oaks only) with either asphalt or concrete paving. 3. Award Bid Option No. 3 (Shady Oaks and a portion of Brinker) with either asphalt or concrete paving. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) July 18, 2006 -City Council Consent Agenda November 6, 2007 -City Council Closed Meeting December 4, 2007 -City Council Closed Meeting RECOMMENDATION The Bid Tabulation Report is attached as Exhibit 2. The ROW reimbursement for Brinker Road requested by the American Legion exceeds the amount of the appraisal prepared for their use and would cause total project costs to eclipse the amount of funding that the City has been able to garner from bond sales and other sources for this project. The earliest that Brinker Road would be able to be constructed is the spring of 2009, which essentially makes it ineffective as a reliever route for Loop 288 construction (projected to end in mid to late 2009). For these reasons, staff recommends bid award to the low bidder, JRJ Paving, L.P. in the amount of $2,884,059.98 for Bid Option No. 2 plus Alternative Bid No. 3 (48" steel casing pipe). JRJ Paving, L.P. meets all requirements for the qualified low bidder for this project. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS JRJ Paving, L.P. Dallas, TX ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT It is anticipated that the construction of the Shady Oaks project alone can be completed by late 2008. Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 4 FISCAL INFORMATION Funding for this project will come from the following accounts: 350150446.1360.40100 $1,500,000.00 350150444.1360.40100 $ 800,000.00 350150447.1360.40100 $ 321,111.31 350150453.1360.40100 $ 262,948.67 $2,884,059.98 EXHIBITS 1. Project Location Map 2. Bid Tabulation Report Respectfully submitted: cam. Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent 1-AIS-Bid 3897 ~ ~;~ cx, ~~ cz ~v- _ ~ PAISLE z ~ ~ ~_ rr: PAISLEY Pnicf E~~ w ~ ~`= f'AJoL~Y EF w u, ~, ~ - co 1 n ~ ~LENi' ~ v g o ~-i ! FEMA ._. ~. c w ~ ~ :~ u.i ~y - ~ ,~ ~ z z ~~ s ram„ , >. - =- -J / o ~, =~~ ~~~ i~ ,ro p~u8LE0A ~Ut~ ~uf~ KIIV" {sl ~~ ~_~ 'sARBE ,_EHR"9 ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~ w ° .~ ~ ~ r r ~~AK CT } sv ~ ~'v," ,r~ ~ Q - ~z w w ~ 0 fi)OU3 ~~ ",., ~.. w rL •. AGL._ Q ' .ER o ~ - WOODf ~D _ 0 .. ,, ~- -~ ~~ ,~~~ E ^;p,~n -, ~ CT l:'7:~ .LS SOM ~w ~, w' T BOB -0-~~ JIB MARKET ST. ' ~ AND ~~ ~ = Q ,~ MFR ~- . - pv~ ~,; L L w Win, ~ ~ WOE; < C CJ ~ V C A I MAC.O ~~ ~~ t4O,,~Cf-PSI ~ ,..~ W MCK'~JNE'r"r ~~ r L ~ Ia ~ PARK ~..~ ~ L '~ ~. K co MILLS .._ `OAK - ~n' ,=; ~,P E MACK J - ~ OArt ~ ~ , ~~~ ,-, ,~ ~ ~ ~;,;~~ ~ , o OL!CE , ; ; _. ~. COuwTY o ~.R~ K PARK w o COURT ~ ~~,P~i ~ o ~ ' HOUSE ~ Of;Y ~ ~ OUNT' z Q z v"!"/ JAIL -' ~ ~ o ' P~IU~: t~ hR'~ 3 ~' a iL~ ORE '~` n F OAKWOOp QSYCA a1ORE ~ ANiM~~L o ~, NFL RYAN T o CONTROL ~ ~ F HIGH CEMETERY n ~ ~ J QJG M 426.. o SC'r1OO z ~ o - ra :~ ~ _3 PRAIRIE ° c~ ~- DUCHES ~ 3 ~ :_ w } ~' 'i~ILSON o WI~SC~ z: Q ~ - } ~ ' } ` M.L.K. ~ g GAELIC !;T o ~.:~ ~; ;: w REC; 3 W m Q n CENTER z TARTAf, ^.I?' ~ _~ - ,- MORSE ~ M,ORSE ~ ~ ~Pr~ z "'~I fl ~ u~i ~ PAU J qN m MOFSE o i Y ABBY Ur, - MCDO;vIAI D STAN ~-ER ~ ~ Y c :IR ~ w K KFR~ ~; j~ JT -~ p~ m Q ~ ails FY ~ n, MEY ~ ~~ ~ ~ , ~. SMITH v Q ,~ a ~~ w J z ~ ~ ~~ ~ z ~ w 3 ~•~ ~ Q ~ ~ KARINA ~ Q ~ 'SHADY O.^- VI STA A i ~•^, SA,NTi, E=F c' ~PLDE~Ri~~ESS ; 'VC'F DRILL GAv~~ n ~' ~ - ;"JAT R w o Q ' t ~ ~ G~ r_R TR, ILLD ATMENT Or _ ~ ~ ' ,~ POWER LANT ~ TREATMENT PLANT RD ~~ ~ 9~0 HOf KIPJS LL v rC~)~ ~p~ L0 g Cp~G' m - -~ ~'q DSO PIPiNr ~ GC"~ r 6R,. 00 SPENCER RO LUKE o f0 ~~ ~ ~^ O~j~ w SPENCER ROAD ~ PL ~ v~u T 4, ~ ~ ~ r `~ ~ ' P~ ~ ~~ ~ PECAN CREEK 0 5 Q~' "i~ J WATER TREATME ^ ~ ~\ ~ ~CIAf ~' } '~' SEC Y ~ `"~'o% "<~ v ~ -3 _ p LOLDEN TRIANGLE ~ ~~i ~0 ~~~,, CT' MALL =' .~ 'E. Y Cr~h~D{;I~ T ~d ~ ~ "; ~ 1 ~ ` Kl c,S~dulG "~~ ti~ Q ~F~;, Qe P~, Y C I ~'~ z ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~; , ~ CQ ~'~:r .~ 0~ wU' G~ ~s~ '~4 0 ~~ ~ 0 QUq~L - C;1 ~ o_ ~F'I~,~ CRF, iii C~: L ,' .;~, c_i ~ ~ = CITY OF DENTON LANDFILL C~ ~ C xl ~ PH(,n ~ '~ ' `:~ z ? ,`~ ~n ~ CROSS 0 o u D 1- ~ , ~ '~ ,~ ~ APT" 'O ~ N OD F~ ~ ~ pSO n, %. ~ ~ C Y ~ ~ N i c~ ~' ~ _, ~ EDWARDS -- ,,~, ,~ N ~,. ti~ c~ ------- ~ 1 . ~ °- Q ° `~~ ~Z,, ' ~ ~ ~~ - ~w Q ~ w ~ ,~~ ~~(~),~li ~ ~ ~ n.~F,TG'II~-,_~f'i~CE ~~ ~ o ~+ ~ (y ~.: c. J W ~ - - ' -, , ~ h ; `; ~ ~-' F' ~ 1. CUPI3ERLAND LYNN ~ ~ ,-~ i p;~JE ~ 4 ' . _~ ~, BLUE RIDGE CT ~ COIr o ~' ~ ~; ,, ~,'~. -~ ~Yi'J4~11r;5'T E-, i 3 ' ~? ~'OTUMO. ~. CHAR1_ESTON CT ~qO~ ~ ° L.4 J DF ~ f- r ^~ a ~, AR p -`-i ~~ S 3 c~ G4 i r ~pi~~O+~ r)R+'~'E' ' SHEN,""~,17C~[~AH °>" 9 / o ~t,,r,ID`~~ ~L, L~ . ~ ~ A ~~ w ~V~'' a~^,~KGR~SE ~'~~~~TER ~ GREAl L,C,~R LN .~ ~~F z S~, ~HArr'E L' BrC, ~ ~ ,0 Lr= ~ , Z ~ ~ RID~G ~ ~ i i ~ o Q ~~ .. ~ ~ GENE°+`~' ~ ~' `~~'': ~~~ ~ << `vA~t_NCIA LANE ~~:4JKt iSE x. ';~ rr u RG`~iDEP:~CE 1~i~J f~'; NU ~Er'.,. -eC' ~ o ~~~~'' ~Rq - v w DENTON _a N „ p ~ _ REGIC~ ~.,-„ ~~ ~ q~ - ~ Y MEDICAL CENTE z ~~~;r( P~Dt,~ ~ `~ ~ ~~, ~~ N~ r~IVE<< ~ s z a ~ C7 ~ r. r_~~ 1 H -- ~,rF J ~ ~ 9~B ~ --~ ~. PO ~ ~ ~ ~ , LAKE O~ °'~ ~~R~~,TCR LA)C_, s I -, -- -~ ;'EASLEY FOR' r..,. ~~r~i~~7~ '" ° ~ ~_ ~n CEO ~ ~ Y ~ TEASLEY ~ ~; ~ ~Op~~ CHA14~'~AIN ~ ec= ~ IND RIVE ~ h,OU~~fON `-`r LA~,nP,~L'r ~~. w w ~ o SO z-. w t`~ L'JU"~ ~;'~k;E RC' o Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road N Exhibit 1 - Location Map S~a~e: i"_200~~ N Q t W (n C CN C N O L CQ C H C .~ L C O C .~ a L C L m ~ ~ O C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ rl O w ~' ~ ~ Q L ~ ~ ~ O ~ W ' ~ Z ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ U] X ~ W Y ZO Q ~ ~ ~ p z o I.n ,~ O ~ ~ '~ Ui tfr ~ ~ p z 0 o ~ N O ~ ~ rri ~ ~ ~ p z 0 0 ~i ,~ m ~ ~ ~ +ff O ~ (''1 ~ ~ lN0 ~ O °. O ~ ~ ~ ~ O o ' O ~~°. N ~ W ~ W ~ W ~ ~ ~ W ~ L ~ n U] c O U x ~ ~ z ~ W a ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ z W a ~ O ~ ~ m ~ z W a ~ O ~ ~ m ~ z ~ Lfl o N N ,~ N ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Q Z W ~ U] z O U J W m W X ~ ~ ~ J Q ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ('~ ~ ~ u1 ~ ~ (''1 ~ ~ N lD ~ Lf1 Lf1 (~'1 ~ ~ ~ ,N-I ~ I~ frl ~ u1 +~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ t~ u1 I~ 111 O ~ 0~ ~ O O ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O o L(1 ~ ~ ~ O O ' ~ ~ N N ~ /1 ~ 1 } 1 } ~ c Z W ~ J ~ J z Q ,~ =Q J ~ U ~ X p W ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ O ~ 11i ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ O ri ~ O O o 0~ Ill rri ~ CO ~ o f~ ~ ~ ~ I11 ~ ~ O N ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ O I11 ~ ,~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ W } n W } ~ W } ~ O ~ Z j J m ~ ai w O X ~ z O ~ W Q ~ m O z ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O z o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ In 0 ~ m O z u1 N N ~ ° ~ ,~ 0 0 ~ +~ ,~ ~ o 0 ~ (''1 ,~ ~ O O O ~ '~ m 1 W ~ n W ~ ~ W ~ n fft {~} f!t ~ ~ Z W ' W ~ ~ p m O z~ ~ ~ o?S Q X ~ (~ Z ~ N N ,~ N f~ ('~ Q1 ~ I~ I~ m 0~ ~ 111 C''1 t~ O ~ o 111 ~'1 ~ Lf1 tPr O ~ r~i O I~ O I~ ~ O 0~ r~i 0~ l0 t~ N ~ Lf1 0~ ~ 111 ~ ~ ~ t~ '~ ~ 0~ O ~ ~ ~ ~' N ~ m ~ ~p ~ ~ O ~ N /l W ~ 1 W ~ n W ~ X o 0 0 ~ O ~ Z ~ Z O~ ~ ~ Y Z UO Q U ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ In Uj ~ m ~ N ~ ~ m O z o ,~ O O O p (Y1 ~ m O z 0 N N ~ ~ ~ (Yl ~ m O z O 0 O O 111 N ~ O 0 O ~ N ~ ~} O O lI1 ~ ~ ~ tPr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ O ('rl O O ~ O ~ W z O~ J Q C7 ~ z O U Y O ~ m W m f~ m O ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ O z ,-1 Lfl Q1 ~ p (Yl ~ ~ ~ O z O N ~ N ~ (>7 ~ ~ ~ O z O O '~ W p~ N ~ ul ~ l0 ~ ul ~ ~} O O O ~ N ~ W ~ W ~ W ~ ~ . u1 rn ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Q Z ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ N 0~ N O ~ ~ m O N (''1 N (''1 ~ ~ m O O O ~ N ~ ~ m O 0~ p1 N N N N ~! ~ O O N N n ~ n ~ ~ ~ W ' U Q Q ~ N ~ ~ z N ~ {~ z ~ t~ {~ z Nth ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ r-I ,-I ~ Ur Z X ~ l0 *~ N ~ O ~ O ~ U1 O (~'1 ,~ O O ~ Ql ,~ O ~ Z W ~ Q a n ~ n Q J J Q ~ ~ rn ~ D~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O (Y1 (~'1 ~ N l0 0~ N ~ rn 01 O ~ ~ m N Lf1 c''l ~ N ~ ~ { f} l0 N m ~ ~j} ~ N ,~ N tPr W ~ W ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m Z O ~„1 N ~ U ~ W ~ O ~ tNn ~ ~ _ N •O' ~ ~ CO L a ¢ O O "_O m N cn m ~ O O 17 m 4J cn m N O O "O_ m N ~ m ~ O O ~ m N ~ m m O O "_O m N ~ m ~ O O ~ m ~ m '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q N ~ ~ N ~ Q f~'1 ra ~ ~ ~ Q ~ O m ~ ~ ~ +-1 ~ ~ z W ~ ~ Q N ~ ~ z W ~ ~ Q Z ,-1 N U_ L !Z U N w N L O C CO C ~_ O a~ Q Q C O U L L O U U L ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SHADY OAKS AND BRINKER PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (BID 3 897-SHADY OAKS AND BRINKER PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AWARDED TO JRJ PAVING, L.P. IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,884,059.98). WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of State law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The following competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 3897 JRJ Paving, L.P. $2,884,059.98 SECTION 2. The acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, and insurance certificate after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. SECTION 4. Upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,2008. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER VVALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: 3-ORD-3897 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Utilities ACM: Howard Martin, 349-8232 ~T 1R.TECT Consider adoption of an Ordinance approving an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (ICA) in the amount of $3,304,057.98 between the City of Denton and Denton County for the construction of Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road, authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Denton; and declaring an effective date. BACKGROUND The Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road projects were approved as part of the 2005 Blue Ribbon Bond election package. The purpose of the Shady Oaks Drive project was to provide access between existing Shady Oaks Drive extending east from Woodrow Lane to Loop 288 at Morse Street. The purpose of the Brinker Road project was to extend existing Brinker Road north from its intersection with Spencer Road to tie in with the new section of Shady Oaks Drive. The Brinker Road project was also intended to provide some relief for traffic along Loop 288 during the construction of that project. Although these two roadways were approved as separate projects in the bond election, for the purposes of design and bidding they were treated as a single job. Refer to Exhibit 1 for proj ect location. Staff has recommended bid award to the low bidder, JRJ Paving, L.P. in the amount of $2,884,059.98 for Bid Option No. 2 plus Alternative Bid No. 3 (48" steel casing pipe) for the Shady Oaks and Brinker Paving and Drainage Improvements project. Engineering consulting costs are projected to total $419,998.00 for the project for a total cost of design and construction of $3,304,057.98. This amount is not reflective of total project costs (does not include internal costs, testing or inspections) but was used as a subtotal for generation of the ICA. Denton County's share of the project through the Interlocal agreement is set at $800,000. OPTTON~ 1. Approve the Interlocal cooperation agreement with Denton County. 2. Rej ect the Interlocal cooperation agreement with Denton County. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the ICA with Denton County in the amount of $3,304,057.98. The amount to be made available from Denton County will be $800,000, with the City's share identified as being $2,504,057.98. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) Not applicable. FISCAL INFORMATION Denton County has identified a total of $800,000 from the Transportation Road Improvement Program - 2004 (TRIP-04) funding available for the City's use. The City's portion of the funding for this project will be drawn from bond funds previously approved for these projects. BID INFORMATION Not applicable. EXHIBITS 1. Location Map 2. Interlocal Cooperative Agreement 3. Ordinance Respectfully submitted, .:.~~ ..~ ..,. _,.fi .. ~, :~ ::; { 5{ i. h' ~ yt ~ r ~'. y l'.•. Frank G. Payne, P.E. City Engineer ~ ~;~ cx, ~~ cz ~v- _ ~ PAISLE z ~ ~ ~_ rr: PAISLEY Pnicf E~~ w ~ ~`= f'AJoL~Y EF w u, ~, ~ - co 1 n ~ ~LENi' ~ v g o ~-i ! FEMA ._. ~. c w ~ ~ :~ u.i ~y - ~ ,~ ~ z z ~~ s ram„ , >. - =- -J / o ~, =~~ ~~~ i~ ,ro p~u8LE0A ~Ut~ ~uf~ KIIV" {sl ~~ ~_~ 'sARBE ,_EHR"9 ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~ w ° .~ ~ ~ r r ~~AK CT } sv ~ ~'v," ,r~ ~ Q - ~z w w ~ 0 fi)OU3 ~~ ",., ~.. w rL •. AGL._ Q ' .ER o ~ - WOODf ~D _ 0 .. ,, ~- -~ ~~ ,~~~ E ^;p,~n -, ~ CT l:'7:~ .LS SOM ~w ~, w' T BOB -0-~~ JIB MARKET ST. ' ~ AND ~~ ~ = Q ,~ MFR ~- . - pv~ ~,; L L w Win, ~ ~ WOE; < C CJ ~ V C A I MAC.O ~~ ~~ t4O,,~Cf-PSI ~ ,..~ W MCK'~JNE'r"r ~~ r L ~ Ia ~ PARK ~..~ ~ L '~ ~. K co MILLS .._ `OAK - ~n' ,=; ~,P E MACK J - ~ OArt ~ ~ , ~~~ ,-, ,~ ~ ~ ~;,;~~ ~ , o OL!CE , ; ; _. ~. COuwTY o ~.R~ K PARK w o COURT ~ ~~,P~i ~ o ~ ' HOUSE ~ Of;Y ~ ~ OUNT' z Q z v"!"/ JAIL -' ~ ~ o ' P~IU~: t~ hR'~ 3 ~' a iL~ ORE '~` n F OAKWOOp QSYCA a1ORE ~ ANiM~~L o ~, NFL RYAN T o CONTROL ~ ~ F HIGH CEMETERY n ~ ~ J QJG M 426.. o SC'r1OO z ~ o - ra :~ ~ _3 PRAIRIE ° c~ ~- DUCHES ~ 3 ~ :_ w } ~' 'i~ILSON o WI~SC~ z: Q ~ - } ~ ' } ` M.L.K. ~ g GAELIC !;T o ~.:~ ~; ;: w REC; 3 W m Q n CENTER z TARTAf, ^.I?' ~ _~ - ,- MORSE ~ M,ORSE ~ ~ ~Pr~ z "'~I fl ~ u~i ~ PAU J qN m MOFSE o i Y ABBY Ur, - MCDO;vIAI D STAN ~-ER ~ ~ Y c :IR ~ w K KFR~ ~; j~ JT -~ p~ m Q ~ ails FY ~ n, MEY ~ ~~ ~ ~ , ~. SMITH v Q ,~ a ~~ w J z ~ ~ ~~ ~ z ~ w 3 ~•~ ~ Q ~ ~ KARINA ~ Q ~ 'SHADY O.^- VI STA A i ~•^, SA,NTi, E=F c' ~PLDE~Ri~~ESS ; 'VC'F DRILL GAv~~ n ~' ~ - ;"JAT R w o Q ' t ~ ~ G~ r_R TR, ILLD ATMENT Or _ ~ ~ ' ,~ POWER LANT ~ TREATMENT PLANT RD ~~ ~ 9~0 HOf KIPJS LL v rC~)~ ~p~ L0 g Cp~G' m - -~ ~'q DSO PIPiNr ~ GC"~ r 6R,. 00 SPENCER RO LUKE o f0 ~~ ~ ~^ O~j~ w SPENCER ROAD ~ PL ~ v~u T 4, ~ ~ ~ r `~ ~ ' P~ ~ ~~ ~ PECAN CREEK 0 5 Q~' "i~ J WATER TREATME ^ ~ ~\ ~ ~CIAf ~' } '~' SEC Y ~ `"~'o% "<~ v ~ -3 _ p LOLDEN TRIANGLE ~ ~~i ~0 ~~~,, CT' MALL =' .~ 'E. Y Cr~h~D{;I~ T ~d ~ ~ "; ~ 1 ~ ` Kl c,S~dulG "~~ ti~ Q ~F~;, Qe P~, Y C I ~'~ z ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~; , ~ CQ ~'~:r .~ 0~ wU' G~ ~s~ '~4 0 ~~ ~ 0 QUq~L - C;1 ~ o_ ~F'I~,~ CRF, iii C~: L ,' .;~, c_i ~ ~ = CITY OF DENTON LANDFILL C~ ~ C xl ~ PH(,n ~ '~ ' `:~ z ? ,`~ ~n ~ CROSS 0 o u D 1- ~ , ~ '~ ,~ ~ APT" 'O ~ N OD F~ ~ ~ pSO n, %. ~ ~ C Y ~ ~ N i c~ ~' ~ _, ~ EDWARDS -- ,,~, ,~ N ~,. ti~ c~ ------- ~ 1 . ~ °- Q ° `~~ ~Z,, ' ~ ~ ~~ - ~w Q ~ w ~ ,~~ ~~(~),~li ~ ~ ~ n.~F,TG'II~-,_~f'i~CE ~~ ~ o ~+ ~ (y ~.: c. J W ~ - - ' -, , ~ h ; `; ~ ~-' F' ~ 1. CUPI3ERLAND LYNN ~ ~ ,-~ i p;~JE ~ 4 ' . _~ ~, BLUE RIDGE CT ~ COIr o ~' ~ ~; ,, ~,'~. -~ ~Yi'J4~11r;5'T E-, i 3 ' ~? ~'OTUMO. ~. CHAR1_ESTON CT ~qO~ ~ ° L.4 J DF ~ f- r ^~ a ~, AR p -`-i ~~ S 3 c~ G4 i r ~pi~~O+~ r)R+'~'E' ' SHEN,""~,17C~[~AH °>" 9 / o ~t,,r,ID`~~ ~L, L~ . ~ ~ A ~~ w ~V~'' a~^,~KGR~SE ~'~~~~TER ~ GREAl L,C,~R LN .~ ~~F z S~, ~HArr'E L' BrC, ~ ~ ,0 Lr= ~ , Z ~ ~ RID~G ~ ~ i i ~ o Q ~~ .. ~ ~ GENE°+`~' ~ ~' `~~'': ~~~ ~ << `vA~t_NCIA LANE ~~:4JKt iSE x. ';~ rr u RG`~iDEP:~CE 1~i~J f~'; NU ~Er'.,. -eC' ~ o ~~~~'' ~Rq - v w DENTON _a N „ p ~ _ REGIC~ ~.,-„ ~~ ~ q~ - ~ Y MEDICAL CENTE z ~~~;r( P~Dt,~ ~ `~ ~ ~~, ~~ N~ r~IVE<< ~ s z a ~ C7 ~ r. r_~~ 1 H -- ~,rF J ~ ~ 9~B ~ --~ ~. PO ~ ~ ~ ~ , LAKE O~ °'~ ~~R~~,TCR LA)C_, s I -, -- -~ ;'EASLEY FOR' r..,. ~~r~i~~7~ '" ° ~ ~_ ~n CEO ~ ~ Y ~ TEASLEY ~ ~; ~ ~Op~~ CHA14~'~AIN ~ ec= ~ IND RIVE ~ h,OU~~fON `-`r LA~,nP,~L'r ~~. w w ~ o SO z-. w t`~ L'JU"~ ~;'~k;E RC' o Shady Oaks Drive and Brinker Road N Exhibit 1 - Location Map S~a~e: i"_200~~ TIC STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) ~avT~~LO~L ~~T~o~ ~~~~~T ~T~~y ~ ~~ ~~~T~~ ~ .~ ~~~r~n~~ o~, T~~ TES AR~E~T is made and entexed by and betv~een Benton Jaunty, Texas, ~. pafltlcal subd~v~slan of ~ state of Texas, hereina~er referred to as "the bounty," and ~e lty of Ue~ta, Texas, a politlcal subdivision located v~thin Senn ~~unty, Texas, duly organized and authora~ed under the laves of the State of Texas, hereinar referred to as "the ~xty." ~T~TH that the County and the pity propose to construct Shady yaks Drive from. its current ter~us east of aodrov~ Lane east to Loop ~S8 and 1rer Road from spencer Road to proposed Shady Oafs Drive, each as a 4 lane divided urban raaday on . new aiig~nrnent Within the city limits of Denton, Texas, hereina~er referred to a `the o~ ect", and BRAS, the County is a duly orgazed and political subdivision of the Mate of Texas engaged in a administration of ~a,ty government aid related services far the benefit of the citizens of Denton Jaunty, ~`exas; and AREAS, the pity is a duly organized political subdivision in Denton bounty, Texas, engaged in the administration of city governn~,ent and related services for the benefit of the citizens of the area seised by the pity; and AREAS, the County anal the; City mutually desire to be suh~ect to the provisions of Chapter ? ofthe Texas Cavernment Code, the ~.iterlocal Cooperation Act; which provides authorization for any local ~governtnent to contract v~ith one or ruare local it ~ ~~#€~~ ~, Page ~ Exhibit 2 gavermnents to perfarm gaverntnentalfunctions and services under the terns of the Act and wI~EREAS, the Jaunty included Brinker Road in its Transportation Road Improvement Program ~ 2U04; and wI~REAS, the pity included Shady Daks Drive and Brinker Road in its capital In~prove~nent Program, . New, TI~REF~RE, the bounty anal the City, for the mutual consideratian hereinafter stated, agree and understand as (allows: ~I. This Agreement becames effective v~hen signed by the last P~ whose sign~.ng mares the respective agreement fully executed. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by either party i.g ~ ~~ 0} days ;advance native in Writing to the other party. . II. The County and the pity hereby agree that the scope of the Bro~ect shall be limited to engineering, right-of-gray aaquYSition and co~nst~uci~on of shady yak give an a new alignment a a four lane divided roadway from its cuxrent terminus east of waodrow Dane east to Laap X88 and Brinker Road on a new a~gn~nent as a four lane divided roadway from Spencer Road to Shady ~s Drive. The pra~ect's total cost is currently estimated to be FDUR HC~NDID NINETEEN TH~UAND NIl~E I~I.INDID AND NINETY E~HT AND N~I1 ~~ D~I~~,ARS {$419,998.~a} for engineering and T'0 LIDN E~HT I~tJNDRED EICr~TY FOUR T~IOUAND AND FIFTH NIl AND ~S1Iaa DOLLAR ~~,~54,~59.~8~ for copstructian far a total estimated cost of THREE ~I~N '~E NDRED AND FOUR THOUSAND AND FIFTY SEVEN AND 9Sltaa DOLLARS ~$~,~a4,057,98~ for canstruc~an and consulting engineering services. },III. The bounty agrees to contribute an amount of EICT HUNDRED TH~I~AND AND Nell ~~ DOLLARS ~~~a4,aaa.~~~ towards the conrpletion of the ~ro~ect franc the Transparta~ion Road Improvement pragra~n ~- X004 funds far the Brinker Road Pray ect. ~~; ~D~to ~ P~g~ 2 As the City proceeds with the completion of the Project, it shall submit invoices for wodc performed on the Project to the County in Gaze of the County Auditor, on a monthly basis and the County shall reimburse the City for all expenses related to the Project within . thirty (30) days of receipt of invoices. IV. The City agrees to contribute from its Capital Improvement Program, an amount of TWO MILLION FIVE HUNDRED AND FOUR THOUSAND AND FIFTY SEVEN AND 98/100 DOLLARS ($2,504,057.98) 4owazds the design and construction ofproject V. The City will oversee the right-of-way acquisition, design and construction of the Project VI. This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part by the County or the City upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party setting forth a substantial failure by the defaulting party to fulfill its obligations under this agreement through no fault of the terminating party. No such termination may be affected unless the defaulting party is given (1) written notice delivered via certified mail, return receipt requested, of intent to terminate, setting forth the substantial failure to perform and (2) not less than thirty (30) calendaz days to cure the failure; and (3) an opportunity for consultation with the _ terminating party prior to termination. Notices shall be directed as follows: For City: Mayor Perry McNeill ' City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 interlocat Cooperation AgeeemenC Cil)~ Of Denton Page 3 Copy To: George C. Campbell, ~ Manager City of Denton 215 ~. N~cinney Street - Dentan, Texas 7~2~1 ~~ ~'or County: ~Tanorable ll~a~y horn ~. Denton County Judge - 11 D west I~ickory De~.to~., '~e~as 7~2~1 - - Copy'~o: Denton Caunty Criminal District Attorney's ice Civil Division F,~. Box 2S5o Denton 'pexa 7201 - :. The City understands and agreesthat the City its employees, servants, agents andlar representatives shall at no time represent themselves ~ be employees, servants, agent andlar representatives of the County. Vim. The County understands and agrees that the County, its employees, servants, agents andlor representatives shall at na ~ time represent themselves to be employees, ser~rants, agent andlar representatives of the City, 't`he . Cou~.ty agrees to and accepts full responsibility for fhe acts, negligence; andlor oxnisions of alX County empla~ees, agents, subcontractors andlar cantract laborers and for those of ail other persons doing orb under a contract or agreement with the County. ~~~~~~ ~ D~~~~c Page 4 • ~. The City agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence, andlor vmissians of a~ City employee~~ agents, subcon~ractors~ andlor antract ~a~orers and for thane of all other persons doing work under a eontra~t or agreement with the City. ~. This agreement is nat intended to ~ extend the liability of the parties beyond that provided by 1a. Neither the County nar the City wives, nor shad be deemed hereby to 'aivex any immunity ar defense that ouid otherwise be available to it against claims made by third patties. ~I. This agreement repxesents the entire agreement betv~een the County and the City and supersedes ail prior nego~a~ons, representations andlar agreements, either Witten ar oral. This agreement nay be amended only by Witten instmment signed by the averning bathes of bath the Jaunty and the. City or those authar,~ed to sign an behalf of thane governing bodies. The validity of this agreement and of any of its term ar provisions, as v~ell as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shaX~ be governed by the tames of the State of Texas, ~ur~her, this agreement shall be performable in Denton County, Texas. ~V. In the event that and pardon of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to la~~r, 7t is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shah remain valid and ba fill farce and effect to the extent possible. ~t~~~~,~ ~~e~a~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~ Page ~~. The undersigned over andlor agents of the parties hereto are the properly. authorised oicia~s and have the necessary authority to execute this agreement an behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolr~tions extending said authority have been duly passed and are nom in fall farce and effect, ~I. pursuant to ectian '~~~.4I 1 ~f the Teas overnment Cade tha parties hereto agree that the purpose of this Agreement ~~ to ensure that certain ovennnental functions and ser~.ces in the area of streets, roads and d.inage are performed The parties hereto furthex agree that each of them is authari~ed to perform the functions and services ~adividua~ly. ~4 This Agreement is not intended to:: extend the liability of the pae band that prav~ided by lam. ~elther the County nor the City V~Ta].ves, nor shall be deemed hereby to have waived, any qty or defense that ou~d otherse be available to 1t against Clams ansmg by third parties. EXECUTED ]n duplicate ar~gina~s th1s, the day of ~~~~. ~~ ~ ~ Denton County, Texas City of Denton 1 l~ west ickary ~~ ~ East N1c~inney Denton, Texas, 7~~~ 1 ~ Denton, Texas 7G~0 ~ ~~, I~onarable 1Vlary darn. Denton County Judge 1y; : ~ George ~. Campbell City N.lanager far the City of Denton { Acting an behalf and b the authority of the Acting on behalf and by the authority of the Caminissio~er Court of Denton County, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas Texas i ~d • ~~ ~~~~~~ Pie G tl ! ~~ 1 . ~~' --~-- Denton Couzzty Clerk APPR~D A T~ ~'~R14I: By: Assistant District Attoey ~l 1~1. ~. City ee~eta~y APPR~~ED A '~~ FARM: ~y: ity Attar~.ey AITDIT~R' CERTIFICATE I hereby certify funds wild be availbla Ia accan~pli~h and pay the abiigatior~ of Denter~ Jaunty, Texas under this Agreement. James e11s, Dentin County Auditor CITE' CERTIFICATE I hereby certify funds ill be avai~ab~e to acco~.plrs and pay the ob ' Lion of the City of De~.ton, Denton. bounty, Texas under this Afire ent. BrYi.,~nglcy, I)~rtor o In~erloca~ ooperatxon Agreement z Of Denton Page 7 #`~.~~RV~ ~1' ~llL~~ ~~V~~l~l.~~.~I ~lJ~~1M .~ ~~~~ ~'he ounty of Denton, acting ~~ and through the Jaunty omiasio~ers Court, having been adsed of a project ~o construct shady yaks Drive on ~ n alignment as a four lane divided roadway from its current terminus east of Woodrow sane east to Loop X88 and ~~nker Road f~orrz spencer Road to had 0~ Drive a - a 4 lane divided urban roadway on new alignment within the city Iimits of Denton, herina~er referred to a~ the "Project" under an lnterlocal ontract, herein gives its specific written approval of the project prior to beginning the pra~ect in sa~sfaction of the requirements of V,'T..~.# Government Gode~ chapter 791, the Interlaca~ Cooperation Act, Section 791.a 14. 'the description of the type of project to be undertaken and its location are as follows: Shady yaks Drive fra~n its existing terminus east to Leap 2SS and drinker Road from Spencer Raad to Shady Gaks Drive as a 4 lane divided urban roadway on new alignment within ~.e city limits of Denton. - -- ~`he local government which requested the pra~ect and with which the County of Denton has contracted is the City of "Denta~'}. - By vote an this date, the Conamissionrs Court has approved the project identified above and authorized execu~.an, of this document by the presiding ofricer on behalf of Denton County} ~'exas. ~. Presiding G#cer of the Denton County commissioners Court ~"~~;~ ~~~~~~~ Page The City of "~enton", act~.ng by anal through ~e City Council, having been advised of a project to construct shady yaks Drfvc an a new alignx~ent as a four bane divided roadway from its current term~.us east of 'aodrav~ Lane east to ~ ~~S S and Brinker Road from spencer Road to Shady ~~ Driive as ~ 41ane divided urban road~ray on n~ alignment v~ithin the c~ty.:li,ts of Denton, hereinaer referred to as the "Prod ect", under an ~nterlocal Contract, herein gives its specific Witten approval of the project prior to begir~g the prof ect ~ satisfaction of the requirements of .T.C.A~, overn~nent Code, Chapter 7~, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, ectron 79~.a14. The descrip~on of the ~ of pra j ect to be undertaken and its laca~an are ~ follov~s: shady yaks Drive from its existing terminus east to soap X88 and Brinker Road from spencer Road to Shady yaks Drive as a 4 lane divided urban roadvray on ne~v a}~gn~nnt within the city limits of Denton, hereina~er referred to as the "PrO~ect", 'The local gavern~ent which requested the project and. with which tho City of "Denton" has contracted is the County of Denton. By vote on this date, the City Council hay approved the project ~dent[ed above and authorised execution of this document by the presiding officer an behalf of the City of "Denton", Texas. ~y. . Presiding Officer of the City of "T]enton." nte~~1 ~~~~~~~~i~~~ ~~~~~t ~' ~ ~~~ Page 9 s:lo~r docu~nentsl~rdinances1~81i~a-Benton county-shady oaks ~rive.doc ~~DINANE N~. AN ~DINANE OF THE CITY ~F DENTIN, TEA APPI~INC~ AN INTERL~~AI~ C~~PERATIN AREEII~ENT IN THE AMOUNT ~F $,~4,a57,~S BETWEEN THE CITY ~F DENTON, TEAS AND DENTIN ~NTY, TEAS FAR THE DNST~U~T~~N ~F SHADY ~A~S DBE AND BRIER READ; A~JTH~RI~IN THE QTY MANAGER. ~R HIS DEINEE T~ E~E~UTE SAID AGREEMENT ~N BEHALF ~F THE CITY OF DENTIN; AND PR~V~DrNC~ AN EFFETI~TE DATE, TIDE ~~UNIL ~F THE CITY ~F DENTON HEREBY ~I~DA~NS SETI~N 1, The pity ounci~ hereby approves an Inter~ocal cooperation Agreement betv~een the City of Denton, Texas and the Denton bounty, Texas far the construction of Shady yaks Dave, extending east from oodra~ Sane to Loop ~~S at Morse Street; and extending Brinker Road earth frar~ its intersection with spencer Road to tie in v~rith the near section of Shady ~a~s Drive, substantia~~y in accardance~ with the rnterlacal oaperation Agreement v~hich i attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference the "Agreement"}. The pity l~Ianager, or hip designee, is authorized to execute the Agreement on behaff of the pity. The pity iVlanager, or his designee, is antharized to carry vut the pity's rights and duties under the Agreement, Any prior actions of the pity taken pr~rsuant to the Agreement are hereby ratified. SECTION ~. The pity council finds that the Agreement v~i~l benefit the pity of Denton and is in the public interest. SETI~N ~. This ordinance shall become effective ~nledlately upon Its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of __„_~ ~OO~, PEIY R. McNEILL, MAYDR .ATTEST: JENNIFER 'ALTER, CITY SECRETARY By: APPROVED A T~ LEAS, FORM: EDWIN 1VI. NYDER, OITY ATTORNEY f .. By: Exhibit 3 TIC STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF DENTON ) ~avT~RLO ~~T~o~ ~~~~~T ~T~~y ~ ~~ ~~~T~~ ~ .~ ~~~r~n~~ o~, T~~ TES AR~E~T in made and entexed by and betv~een Benton Jaunty, Texas, ~. pafltlcal subd~v~slan of ~ state of Texan, hereina~er referred to as "the bounty," and ~e lty of Ue~ta, Texas, a political subiv~s~on located v~thin Senn ~~unty, Texas, duly organized and authora~ed under the laves of the State of Texas, hereinar referred to as "the ~xty." ~T~TH that the County and the qty propane to construct Shady yaks Drive from. its current ter~u cant of aodrov~ Lane giant to Loop ~S8 and 1rer Road from fencer Road to profaned Shady Oafs Drive, each as a 4 lane divided urban raaday on . new aiig~nrnent Within the city limits of Denton, T`exa, hereina~er referred to a `the o~ ect", and BRAS, the County is a duly orgazed and political nubdivinian of the Mate of Texas engaged in a administration of ~a,ty government aid related services far the benefit of the citizens of Denton Jaunty, ~`exas; and AREAS, the pity in a duly organized political subdivision in Denton bounty, Texas, engaged in the administration of city governn~,ent and related services for the benefit of the citizens of the area seised by the pity; and AREAS, the County anal the; City mutually desire to be suh~ect to the provisions of Chapter ? ofthe Texas Cavernment Code, the ~.iterlocal Cooperation Act; which provides authorization for any local ~governtnent to contract v~ith one or ruare local it ~ ~~#€~~ ~, Page ~ gavermnents to perform gaverntnentalfunctions and services under the terns of the Act and wI~EREAS, the Jaunty included Brinker Road in its Transportation Road Improvement Program ~ 2U04; and wI~REAS, the pity included Shady Daks Drive and Brinker Road in its capital In~prove~nent Program, . New, TI~REF~RE, the bounty anal the City, for the mutual consideration hereinafter stated, agree and understand as follows: ~I. This Agreement becomes effective v~hen signed by the last P~ whose sign~.ng mares the respective agreement fully executed. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by either party i.g ~ ~~ 0} days ;advance native in Writing to the other party. . II. The County and the pity hereby agree that the scope of the Bro~ect shall be limited to engineering, right-of-gray aaquYSition and co~nst~uci~on of shady yak give an a new alignment a a four lane divided roadway from its cuxrent terminus east of waodrow Dane east to Laap X88 and Brinker Road on a new a~gn~nent as a four lane divided roadway from Spencer Road to Shady ~s Drive. The pra~ect's total cost is currently estimated to be FDUR HC~NDID NINETEEN TH~UAND NIl~E I~I.INDID AND NINETY E~HT AND N~I1 ~~ D~I~~,ARS {$419,998.~a} for engineering and T'0 LIDN E~HT I~tJNDRED EICr~TY FOUR T~IOUAND AND FIFTH NIl AND ~S1Iaa DOLLAR ~~,~54,~59.~8~ for copstructian far a total estimated cost of THREE ~I~N '~E NDRED AND FOUR THOUSAND AND FIFTY SEVEN AND 9Sltaa DOLLARS ~$~,~a4,057,98~ for canstruc~an and consulting engineering services. },III. The bounty agrees to contribute an amount of EICT HUNDRED TH~I~AND AND Nell ~~ DOLLARS ~~~a4,aaa.~~~ towards the conrpletion of the ~ro~ect franc the Transparta~ion Road Improvement pragra~n ~- X004 funds far the Brinker Road Pray ect. ~~; ~D~to ~ P~g~ 2 As the City proceeds with the completion of the Project, it shall submit invoices for wodc performed on the Project to the County in caze of the County Auditor, on a monthly basis and the County shall reimburse the City for all expenses related to the Project within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoices. Iv. The City agrees to contribute from its Capital Improvement Program, an amount of TWO M1I.LION FIVE HUNDRED AND FOUR THOUSAND AND FIFTY SEVEN AND 98/100 DOLLARS ($2,504,057.98) 4owards the design and construction of project V. The City will oversee the right-of-~vay acquisition, design and constntction of the Project VI. This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part by the County or the City upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party setting forth a substantial failure by the defaulting party to fulfill its obligations under this agreement through no fault of the terminating' party. No such tenaination may be affected unless the defaulting party is given (1) written notice delivered via certified mail, return receipt requested, of intent to terminate, setting forth the substantial failure to perform and (2) not less than thirty (30) calendaz days to cure the failure; and (3) an opportunity for consultation with the iPrminaYirtY patty prior to termination. Notices shall be directed as follows: For City: Mayor Perry McNeill City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 intedocal Cooperation Agreement t'.ity Of Denton Page 3 Copy To: George C. Campbell, ~ Manager City of Denton 215 ~. N~cinney Street - Dentan, Texas 7~2~1 ~~ ~'or County: ~Tanorable ll~a~y horn ~. Denton County Judge - 11 D west I~ickory De~.to~., '~e~as 7~2~1 - - Copy'~o: Denton Caunty Criminal District Attorney's ice Civil Division F,~. Box 2S5o Denton 'pexa 7201 - :. The City understands and agreesthat the City its employees, servants, agents andlar representatives shall at no time represent themselves ~ be employees, servants, agent andlar representatives of the County. Vim. The County understands and agrees that the County, its employees, servants, agents andlor representatives shall at na ~ time represent themselves to be employees, ser~rants, agent andlar representatives of the City, 't`he . Cou~.ty agrees to and accepts full responsibility for fhe acts, negligence; andlor oxnisions of alX County empla~ees, agents, subcontractors andlar cantract laborers and for those of ail other persons doing orb under a contract or agreement with the County. ~~~~~~ ~ D~~~~c Page 4 • ~. The City agrees to and accepts full responsibility for the acts, negligence, andlor vmissians of a~ City employee~~ agents, subcon~ractors~ andlor antract ~a~orers and for thane of all other persons doing work under a eontra~t or agreement with the City. ~. This agreement is nat intended to ~ extend the liability of the parties beyond that provided by 1a. Neither the County nar the City wives, nor shad be deemed hereby to 'aivex any immunity ar defense that ouid otherwise be available to it against claims made by third patties. ~I. This agreement repxesents the entire agreement betv~een the County and the City and supersedes ail prior nego~a~ons, representations andlar agreements, either Witten ar oral. This agreement nay be amended only by Witten instmment signed by the averning bathes of bath the Jaunty and the. City or those authar,~ed to sign an behalf of thane governing bodies. The validity of this agreement and of any of its term ar provisions, as v~ell as the rights and duties of the parties hereto, shaX~ be governed by the tames of the State of Texas, ~ur~her, this agreement shall be performable in Denton County, Texas. ~V. In the event that and pardon of this agreement shall be found to be contrary to la~~r, 7t is the intent of the parties hereto that the remaining portions shah remain valid and ba fill farce and effect to the extent possible. ~t~~~~,~ ~~e~a~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~ Page ~~. The undersigned over andlor agents of the parties hereto are the properly. authorised oicia~s and have the necessary authority to execute this agreement an behalf of the parties hereto, and each party hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolr~tions extending said authority have been duly passed and are nom in fall farce and effect, ~I. pursuant to ectian '~~~.4I 1 ~f the Teas overnment Cade tha parties hereto agree that the purpose of this Agreement ~~ to ensure that certain ovennnental functions and ser~.ces in the area of streets, roads and d.inage are performed The parties hereto furthex agree that each of them is authari~ed to perform the functions and services ~adividua~ly. ~4 This Agreement is not intended to:: extend the liability of the pae band that prav~ided by lam. ~elther the County nor the City V~Ta].ves, nor shall be deemed hereby to have waived, any qty or defense that ou~d otherse be available to 1t against Clams ansmg by third parties. EXECUTED ]n duplicate ar~gina~s th1s, the day of ~~~~. ~~ ~ ~ Denton County, Texas City of Denton 1 l~ west ickary ~~ ~ East N1c~inney Denton, Texas, 7~~~ 1 ~ Denton, Texas 7G~0 ~ ~~, I~onarable 1Vlary darn. Denton County Judge 1y; : ~ George ~. Campbell City N.lanager far the City of Denton { Acting an behalf and b the authority of the Acting on behalf and by the authority of the Caminissio~er Court of Denton County, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas Texas i ~d • ~~ ~~~~~~ Pie G tl ! ~~ 1 . ~~' --~-- Denton Couzzty Clerk APPR~D A T~ ~'~R14I: By: Assistant District Attoey ~l 1~1. ~. City ee~eta~y APPR~~ED A '~~ FARM: ~y: ity Attar~.ey AITDIT~R' CERTIFICATE I hereby certify funds wild be availbla Ia accan~pli~h and pay the abiigatior~ of Denter~ Jaunty, Texas under this Agreement. James e11s, Dentin County Auditor CITE' CERTIFICATE I hereby certify funds ill be avai~ab~e to acco~.plrs and pay the ob ' Lion of the City of De~.ton, Denton. bounty, Texas under this Afire ent. BrYi.,~nglcy, I)~rtor o In~erloca~ ooperatxon Agreement z Of Denton Page 7 #`~.~~RV~ ~1' ~llL~~ ~~V~~l~l.~~.~I ~lJ~~1M .~ ~~~~ ~'he ounty of Denton, acting ~~ and through the Jaunty omiasio~ers Court, having been adsed of a project ~o construct shady yaks Drive on ~ n alignment as a four lane divided roadway from its current terminus east of Woodrow sane east to Loop X88 and ~~nker Road f~orrz spencer Road to had 0~ Drive a - a 4 lane divided urban roadway on new alignment within the city Iimits of Denton, herina~er referred to a~ the "Project" under an lnterlocal ontract, herein gives its specific written approval of the project prior to beginning the pra~ect in sa~sfaction of the requirements of V,'T..~.# Government Gode~ chapter 791, the Interlaca~ Cooperation Act, Section 791.a 14. 'the description of the type of project to be undertaken and its location are as follows: Shady yaks Drive fra~n its existing terminus east to Leap 2SS and drinker Road from Spencer Raad to Shady Gaks Drive as a 4 lane divided urban roadway on new alignment within ~.e city limits of Denton. - -- ~`he local government which requested the pra~ect and with which the County of Denton has contracted is the City of "Denta~'}. - By vote an this date, the Conamissionrs Court has approved the project identified above and authorized execu~.an, of this document by the presiding ofricer on behalf of Denton County} ~'exas. ~. Presiding G#cer of the Denton County commissioners Court ~"~~;~ ~~~~~~~ Page The City of "~enton", act~.ng by anal through ~e City Council, having been advised of a project to construct shady yaks Drfvc an a new alignx~ent as a four bane divided roadway from its current term~.us east of 'aodrav~ Lane east to ~ ~~S S and Brinker Road from spencer Road to Shady ~~ Driive as ~ 41ane divided urban road~ray on n~ alignment v~ithin the c~ty.:li,ts of Denton, hereinaer referred to as the "Prod ect", under an ~nterlocal Contract, herein gives its specific Witten approval of the project prior to begir~g the prof ect ~ satisfaction of the requirements of .T.C.A~, overn~nent Code, Chapter 7~, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, ectron 79~.a14. The descrip~on of the ~ of pra j ect to be undertaken and its laca~an are ~ follov~s: shady yaks Drive from its existing terminus east to soap X88 and Brinker Road from spencer Road to Shady yaks Drive as a 4 lane divided urban roadvray on ne~v a}~gn~nnt within the city limits of Denton, hereina~er referred to as the "PrO~ect", 'The local gavern~ent which requested the project and. with which tho City of "Denton" has contracted is the County of Denton. By vote on this date, the City Council hay approved the project ~dent[ed above and authorised execution of this document by the presiding officer an behalf of the City of "Denton", Texas. ~y. . Presiding Officer of the City of "T]enton." nte~~1 ~~~~~~~~i~~~ ~~~~~t ~' ~ ~~~ Page 9 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2007 Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed DEPARTMENT: Materials Management to Frank Payne, P.E. 349-8946 ACM: Jon Fortune ~TIR.TF,CT Consider adoption of an Ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a public works contract for the construction of Western Boulevard Drainage Phase I; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing an effective date (Bid 3929-Western Boulevard Drainage Phase I awarded to Ed Bell Construction in the amount of $4,699,337.85). BID INFORMATION The Western Boulevard project was approved as part of the 2005 Blue Ribbon Bond Election package. This proj ect is intended to provide access between US Highway 3 80 south to FM 1515 (Airport Road). It is also intended to provide access for the Denton Municipal Airport when Masch Branch Road is closed as a result of runway extensions (projected to occur in 2008). Refer to Exhibit 1 for proj ect location. The City received bids on the referenced project on December 13, 2007. There were a total of five bidders for the project with bids ranging from a low of $4,699,337.85 to a high of $5,769,975.25. The City's consulting engineer projected the probable cost at approximately $5,100,000. The Bid Tabulation Report is attached as Exhibit 2. Staff recommends bid award to the low bidder, Ed Bell Construction in the amount of $4,699,337.85. Ed Bell Construction meets all requirements for qualified low bidder for this project. RECOMMENDATION Award Bid 3929 to Ed Bell Construction for the total bid amount of $4,699,337.85. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Ed Bell Construction Da11as, Texas STAFF COST ESTIMATE The engineer's estimate for this project was a range from $3.3 million to $5.5 million. Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT It is anticipated that the construction of the Western Boulevard project alone can be completed by late 2008. FISCAL INFORMATION Funding for this project will come from the following Western Boulevard accounts: 350009453.1360.40100 $3,205,551.44 350009447.1360.40100 $1,315,364.00 350009432.1360.40100 $ 178,422.41 $4,699,337.85 F,XHTRTT~ 1. Project Location Map 2. Bid Tabulation Report Respectfully submitted: cam. Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent 1-AIS-Bid 3929 W Q d' m °m M COFFEY DR~vE z z z MASCH BRANCH z ~ JOHN DRIVE W m W °z BAUER ~ WINDSOR ~ WINDSOR STAE 5 Q ~ o a 3 HAMPTON RD. HUYLER Z n a ~ 0 3~ N 1~ Y ~ R Q: ~ O ~ J O O N Z W z AMI p OK O W A T a z ~ HOSPITAL ~ w WESTWARD m a m ~ TIESZEN ~ ; ;ARCEL N y ~~ m ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ THUND m g ~ J °z N ~ GUSTA U ~ ~ Q 2 LARIAT R ~ LOS C NA N UNIVERSITY DRIVE WEST HWY 380 UNIVERSITY UNI' ERSITY DRIVE a 0 a o o: ' U J Q Z m ~ ~ N U N a Selwyn School CRE NT ~ W Q m LIN N w z Z ~ m° ~ ~ CHRISTAL RD. PARK N JIM CHRISTAL ROAD SCRIPTURE Q ~ DENTON o ~ o w COMMUNITY ~ ~ CENTER OUSTON P H Q ~~~ ~ ~ OAK m ~ 9¢ WEST OAK GP a ~CkOR HICKORY W~a z 0 m OUI a TXDOT ~~~ ... ~ a GG~ NATIONAL ~G~ ARMORY UNT STADIU 9~ ~ ~y z 0 o ~ ~n v Z~ w N, ~`3 o a a R~ SF PORE RO p~R a J U O ~. ~ ~ FM 1515 AIRPORT RD. ~a - o ~ o z m a z ~ ~ TR m m= ~ JU O U JOHN CARRELL W o o: z o Western Boulevard " Exhibit 1 Location Map S~a~e: i"_2~~~~ ~ N Z ~ ~ ~ W N O Q c .~ L .~ t~ o > o a~ N ~ M MOO r W N ~ O ~ L c~ ~ ~ N cn ~ ~ N m ~ U ~ f` O (~ a0 M L ~ ~ ~ CO ~ ~ O N N ~ ~ ~ ~ Q C ~ ~ O O 0 0 (A (~ (A (A ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~+ > O ~U N ~ ~ ~ M N O o0 ~ 0 N N N ~ ~ i 0 (6 C ~ ~ f` N ~ O ~ ~ = t6 ~ 0 f` N N ~ ~ N N N N _ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L U > ~ O ~ ~ O W L N M ~ (~ ~ O c~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ c 0 ~ O a0 ~ M (~ N O N ~ 0 O V A CO O O ~ (D ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N ~ U +~ J O O I` ~ I` ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~+ U ~ M N N ~ ~ (6 U O CO M (~ M O N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M L ~ ~ N O a0 ~ _ ~ ~~ , ~ > 0 U O ~ (~ M ~ N ~ N ~+ N ~ N >+ ~ O ~ • N f` ` I` O ~ f` L ~ N ~ f .. O .. O .. a0 .. ao .. ~ U W ~} ~} ~} {{} ~} N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f` 0 0 L - }, ~ O Ln ~ In ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ m L N CO (~ N N N N ~ a~ ~ N ~ f` N ~ O O ~ ~+ ~ ~+ > W o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~-. + .-. + ~ ~ Z N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O !~ (n `•' ~ N c~ ~ ~ Q m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a O (n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ to Q m C C C m U ~ m a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~' ~ ~ m W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a m ~ ~ ~ ~ c > > Q Q •` ~ ~ ~ ~ N c~ ~ ~ Z m N a .3 c c EE a~ a~ >> ~~ as ~~ v v U U C C UU ~~ ~~ 0 0 ~~ ~~ .~ .~ 00 am ~~ ~ ~ L L ~ ~ QQ C~ ~ c c .~ .~ as ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WESTERN BOULEVARD DRAINAGE PHASE I; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (BID 3929-WESTERN BOULEVARD DRAINAGE PHASE I AWARDED TO ED BELL CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,699,337.85). WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of State law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The following competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 3929 Ed Bell Construction $4,699,337.85 SECTION 2. The acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, and insurance certificate after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. SECTION 4. Upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,2008. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER VVALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: 3-ORD-Bid 3929 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Materials Management ACM: Jon Fortune Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed to Emerson Vorel 349-8274 ~TIR.TF,CT Consider adoption of an Ordinance authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with the firm of Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. to provide architectural design services for the City of Denton Senior Center; authorizing the expenditure of funds therefore, and providing an effective date (File 3943 in an amount not to exceed $145,000). FILE INFORMATION This professional service agreement is for the preparation of plans and documents for the renovation and expansion of approximately 3000 square feet to the existing Denton Senior Center located at 509 North Bell Ave. The services to be performed by the architect include: building programming, schematic design, design development, construction documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS) City Council approved a professional service agreement with Brown, Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. on April 5, 2007 to perform a feasibility study on the existing Denton Senior Center and determine future needs as the community grows. The study recommendations were presented to Council on October 16, 2007. RECOMMENDATION Approve a professional service agreement with Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $145,000. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. Dallas, TX ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The design services will begin upon Council approval with an estimated completion date for the entire proj ect of April 2009. Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 FISCAL INFORMATION The design services will be funded from the following accounts: 400090451.1360.20100 $119,329.55 400090453.1360.20100 $ 25,670.45 $145,000.00 Requisition# 85221 has been entered in the purchasing software system. EXHIBITS Proposal from Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. Respectfully submitted: ~~~ Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent 1-AIS-File 3943 EXHIBIT 1 BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD _ n R c H i T E c T s, i N c. 3535 TRAVIS STREET SUITE 250 LB-102 DALLAS, TEXAS 75204 214-528-8704 FAX 528-8707 www.brwarch,com December 10, 2007 Mr. Robert Tickner Superintendent of Parks Planning and Development City of Denton Parks and Recreation Department City Hall East 601 E. Hickory, Suite B Denton, TX 76205 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSAL FOR THE DENTON SENIOR CENTER RENOVATION AND EXPANSION Brown Reynolds Watford Architects are pleased to submit this professional services ro osal . ~ pp for architectural and engineering services for the renovation expansion of the Denton Senior Center. The proj ect scope, our proposed team, scope of services, project schedule, and compensation are described below. PROJECT SCOPE We understand the proj ect scope involves the interior renovation and an approximatel 3,000 . .. ., y SF building addition as allowable within the budget to the existing Denton Senior Center that is located at 509 N. Bell Avenue in Denton, Texas. Exterior site work will include minimal grading, landscaping, and irrigation as required by the building expansion and landsca in pg ordinances. The City will renovate and expand the existing parking lot under se arate p contract. PROJECT TEAM Basic Services • BRW Architects, Inc. -Craig Reynolds, FAIR - Gary DeVries, AIA, LEED AP -Ray Holliday, AIA, ASLA, LI • TMBP Consulting Engineers, Inc. -Jerry Barnett, P.E. -Joe Pitt • B asharkhah Engineering, Inc. - S am Basharkhah, P . E. Architect of Record Principal Proj ect Manager Project Landscape Architect Structural and Civil En gin ePrc Structural Principal Civil Principal Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineers Principal Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES Basic Services Basic Services shall include services for the disciplines shown below. • Architectural • .Civil Engineering, including grading, drainage, on-site utilities (excludes site paving) • Structural Engineering • Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering • Landscape Architecture, including irrigation performance system specification • Cost Estimating Services shall commence with a Notice to Proceed and terminate thirty (30) days after the date of Substantial Completion originally established in the construction contract. Additional Services Additional Services shall include the services shown below. Topographic, Tree, Utility and Easement Survey (for the building addition area) Geotechnical Investigation (for the building addition, unless the Owner provides the previous building addition geotechnical investigation report) City Provided Services The City shall provide the services shown below as required to complete the project. The Architect shall .coordinate Basic Services work with the City Provided Services. • All required Zoning Modif cations, including S.U.P.s, P.D.s, plats, and variances • Existing Building Asbestos Survey (required for building permit) • Audio /Visual Systems (Architect shall provide electrical power and empty conduit as directed by the City) • Building Security System Modifications (Architect shall provide electrical power and empty conduit as directed by the City) • Telecommunications Equipment and Wiring Design, including voice, data, cable TV, fiber optic cabling, wire management systems, and terminations (Architect shall rovide em t p pY junction boxes and electrical power as directed by the. City) • Computer Equipment selection, procurement, and installation (Architect shall provide electrical power and empty conduit as directed by the City) • Texas Accessibility Standards Site Inspection (at completion of construction) • Furniture, Fixturing and Equipment (FF&E) selection, procurement and installation Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 3 Excluded from Scope of Basic Services The services shown below are not anticipated at this time, however, project requirements identified during design may require them to be added. • .Off Site Utility Engineering • On-Site Storm Water Detention • Site Environmental, Flood Plain or Archeological Issues • Food Vending Consulting for Equipment Selection and Procurement • Building Energy Modeling or Utility Cost Estimates • Economic, Operations, or Business Planning • Professional Models and Renderings • Preparation or Assistance with Multiple Bid Packages • Full-Time Construction Inspection • Laboratory Testing /Inspections • Mechanical Test and Balance • Commissioning Services • Community, Park Board or City Council Meetings or Presentations SCOPE OF SERVICES BY PHASE The scope of services shall include the following phases: • Programming • Schematic Design • Design Development • C®nstructl®n D®CUmentS • Pricing and Contract Award • Construction Administration The scope of services for each phase is described below. PROG~MING Using BRW's Feasibility Study as a starting point, the Architect shall meet with various owner groups to establish the desired Senior Center activities and subsequently create a Space Program that shows the appropriate space requirements and room needs. During this phase, the Architect shall also investigate applicable codes and zoning ordinances and establish required accessibility modifications Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 4 Meetings and Deliverables The Programming phase shall include two (2) working programming meetings to establish the Space Program. Deliverables shall include three (3) copies of the Space Program for the City's review and comment. SCHEMATIC DESIGN The Architect shall provide Schematic Design Documents based on the Space Program. The documents shall establish the preliminary design illustrating the scale and relationship of the components. The Schematic Design Documents shall include a preliminary site plan, building plans, sections and elevations. Preliminary selections of major building systems and construction materials shall be noted on the drawings or described in writin .burin the g g design process, the Architect shall work with the City's consultants under separate contract to coordinate the scope of the project. At the com letion of Schematic Desi the Architect p ~~ shall prepare a preliminary estimate of the Cost of the Work and update the proj ect schedule. Meetings and Deliverables The Schematic Design phase shall include two (2) design review meetings. Schematic Design deliverables shall include three (3) full-size sets of documents for the City's review and comment. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS The Architect shall provide Design Development Documents based on the Schematic Design Documents, including any modifications required to align the proj ect scope and budget. The Design Development Documents shall illustrate and describe the refinement of the design establishing the scope, relationships, forms, size and appearance of the project by means of plans, sections and elevations, typical construction details, and outlines ecifications. The p Design Development Documents shall include in general the quality levels for major materials and project systems. During the design process, the Architect shall work with the City's consultants under separate contract to coordinate the scope of the project. At the completion of Design Development, the Architect shall update the preliminary estimate of the Cost of the Work and the project schedule. The Architect shall advise the City of any chan es from revious estimates due to g P adjustments in the project scope, refinement of the estimate, or general market conditions. If at any time the Architect's estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the City's budget, the Architect shall make appropriate recommendations to the Cit to ad'ust the ro'ect's size Y J pJ quality or budget, and the City shall cooperate with the Architect in making such adjustments. Meetings and Deliverables The Design Development phase shall incll~rie one (1) design rev~e~~~ meeting, Desi~~ Development deliverables shall include three (3) full-size sets of documents for the City's review and comment. Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 5 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS The Architect shall provide Construction Documents based on the Design Development Documents, including any modifications required to align the project scope and budget. The Construction Documents shall include Drawings and Specifications that establish in detail the quality levels of materials and project systems required for construction. During the development of the Specifications, the Architects shall coordinate the City's bidding requirements and solicitation through the Purchasing Department to prepare a Proj ect Manual that includes (1) bidding and procurement information which describes the time lace ~p and conditions of bidding; bidding or proposal forms; and the form of agreement between the City and the Contractor; and (2) the Conditions of the contract for Construction (General, Supplementary and other Conditions). The Architect shall update the estimate of the Cost of the Work and project schedule at 95% completion of Construction Documents. Meetings and Deliverables The Construction Documents phase shall include one (1) design review meeting at 95% complete CDs. Construction Document deliverables shall include three (3) full-size sets of drawings and specifications at 95% completion for the City's review and comment. Final deliverables at 100% completion shall include three (3) sets of full-size sets and one compact disk of the Contract Documents in .pdf format. PRICING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING METHOD We understand the City intends to request proposals through a competitive bidding delivery method. It is recognized that neither the Architect nor the City has control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices, over competitive bidding, or market conditions. Accordingly, the Architect cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids will not vary from the City's budget or the Architect's cost estimates. The Architect shall pay to create multiple compact disks of the final contract. documents for bidding purposes and offer copies to bidders at a price an agreed upon with the City. As an alternative, the City shall pay to reproduce the final contract documents in paper form for sale or loan with refundable deposit to bidders. The Architect shall prepare responses to questions from bidders and provide clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents in the form of Addenda. The Architects shall consider requests for substitutions during the pricing period, as permitted by the Contract Documents, and shall prepare Addenda including ap roved substitutions. p The Architect shall conduct apre-bid conference for prospective bidders. Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 6 The Architect shall assist with bid evaluation and make a recommendation for award of a construction contract. CONSTRUCTIQN ADMINISTRATION The Architect shall participate in apre-construction conference within 10 calendar days of the Notice to Proceed. The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work completed. The Architect's representative shall attend progress meetings and prepare field reports describing the status of the work and any discrepancies observed from the Construction Documents. The Architect sha11 not have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction as selected by the Contractor, or for the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the Contractor, or for the failure of the Contractor to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances,. codes or orders applicable to the Contractor furnishing and performing the work. The Architect shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon Contractor's submittals such as shop drawings, product data, samples, and mock-u s for eneral p g conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. Review is not conducted for the purpose of determining the accuracy, completeness, or quantities, or for substantiating instructions for installation or performance of equipment or systems. The Architect shall only respond to reasonable Contractor's Requests for Information and prepare Proposal Requests and Change Orders for the City's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Architect's interpretations and decisions shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in written documentation. The Architect shall review and certify the amounts requested by the Contractor on the Application and Certification for Payments. The issuance of a Certification for Payment shall not be a representation that the Architect has (1) made exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality of the work, (2) reviewed construction means, methods, techniques, or sequences, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and material suppliers, or (4) ascertain how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the contract sum. The Architect shall perform final closeout procedures as defined in the Contract Documents, including preparation and verification of Punch Lists for the Contractor's use. Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 7 Construction Administration services beyond the following limits shall be an Additional ervice: • Up to two (2) reviews of any single Contractor submittal • Site observation visits averaging twice per month • One Punch List at Substantial Completion • One site observation visit to verify completion of Punch List • Evaluation of Contractor's substitution requests beyond 90 days after the Notice to Proceed • City requested project scope changes resulting in changes to the Construction Documents • Evaluation of claims submitted by the Contractor in connection with the work CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES The City shall furnish the services of consultants other than those designated as Basic Services, or authorize the Architect to furnish them as an Additional Service, when such services are required to complete the work. The City shall not increase or decrease the overall budget, or the portion the budget allocated for construction or contingencies, without modifying the agreement of the Architect to a corresponding change in the proj ect scope, quality, and / or rofessional service fees. p The City shall provide written comments within 10 calendar days pertaining to documents submitted by the Architect in order to avoid unreasonable Bela in the orderl and se uential y y q progress of the Architects' services. The City shall not modify a decision once given to the Architect without additional compensation to the Architect. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSIBILITIES The Architect shall submit for the City's approval a schedule for the performance of the Architect's services, including allowances for periods of time required for the City's review, for the performance of the City's consultants, and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the work. The Architect shall review laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the Architect's services. The Architect shall respond in the design to requirements imposed by governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the work. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of services and information furnished by the City. The Architect shall provide prompt written notice to the City if the Architect becomes aware of any errors, omissions or inconsistencies in such services or 1~'iforiiiatioii. Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 8 PROJECT SCHEDULE We anticipate the following time periods and dates for the proj ect phases. We understand that funds are currently available for professional A/E services. The City will sell bonds to finance construction in June 2008. • Programming 2 weeks • Schematic Design 4 weeks • Design Development 5 weeks • Construction Documents 6 weeks • Pricing and Contract Award 7 - 8 weeks • Construction 9 -10 months PROJECT BUDGET January 2008 January -February 2008 Feb -March 2008 March -April 2008 May -June 2008 July 2008 -March /April 2009 We understand the portion of the total proj ect budget devoted for construction is approximately $1,280,000. COMPENSATION Based upon the scope of services described above, Brown Reynolds Watford Architects proposes lump sum fees and fee allowances as shown below. • Basic Services Fee $130,000 • Additional Services Fee Allowances - Topographic, Tree, & Utility Survey 10,000 - Geotechnical Survey $5,000 Reimbursable expenses are in addition to the fees and shall be invoiced at the same cost billed to the Architect. They shall include, but are not limited to, document reproduction, courier and overnight deliveries, and TDLR Texas Accessibility Standards document review fee. The TDLR site inspection fee at the project completion is a direct expense to the City. Basic Services shall be invoiced monthly based on the percent complete for each phase, but shall not exceed the percentages shown below. • Programming 5% • Schematic Design 15% • Design Development 15% • Construction Documents 40% • Bidding 5% • Construction Administration 20% Total 100% Mr. Robert Tickner EXHIBIT 1 Professional Services Proposal December 10, 2007 Page 9 The Architect shall proceed with Basic Services upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed from the City. The Architect shall not proceed with Additional Services Fee Allowances until authorized in writing by the City approving separate lump sump fees. Additional Services performed by consultants shall be computed at 1.10 times the amount billed the Architect. Additional Services performed by BRW Architects shall be compensated at the hourly rates listed below. BRW Architects Hourly Rates • Principal $195.00 per hour • Proj ect Director $170.00 per hour • Proj ect Manager $145.00 per hour • Project Architect $125.00 per hour • Architect $110.00 per hour • Technical $ 85.00 per hour • Clerical $ b5.00 per hour We hope this proposal meets your expectations. Please call onus with any comments or questions. Upon your acceptance, we will prepare an AIA contract as our final agreement. We look forward to continuing our work with the City of Denton on this important Proj ect. BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD ARCHTECTS, INC. CRAIG S. REYNOLDS, FAIA PRINCIPAL ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE FIRM OF BROWN REYNOLDS WATFORD ARCHITECTS, INC., TO PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF DENTON SENIOR CENTER; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (FILE 3943 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $145,000). WHEREAS, The professional services provider (the "Provider) mentioned in this ordinance is being selected as the most highly qualified on the basis of its demonstrated competence and qualifications to perform the proposed professional services; and WHEREAS, The fees under the proposed contract are fair and reasonable and are consistent with and not higher than the recommended practices and fees published by the professional associations applicable to the Provider's profession and such fees do not exceed the maximum provided by law; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a professional service contract with Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc., to provide professional architectural and related services for the renovation of the City of Denton Senior Center, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to expend funds as required by the attached contract. SECTION 3. The findings in the preamble of this ordinance are incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,2008. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER VVALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: 3-ORD-3943 ATTACHMENT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of 2007, by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, with its principal office at 215 East McKinney Street, Denton, Denton County, Texas 76201, hereinafter called "Owner" and Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc.. with its corporate office at 3535 Travis Street, Suite 250, LB-102, Dallas, TX 75204 hereinafter called "Design Professional," acting herein, by and through their duly authorized representatives. In consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: SECTION 1 EMPLOYMENT OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL The Owner hereby contracts with the Design Professional, a licensed Texas architect or engineer, as an independent contractor. The Design Professional hereby agrees to perform the services as described herein and in the Proposal, the General Conditions, and other attachments to this Agreement that are referenced in Section 3, in connection with the Project. The Pro' ect shall include, J without limitation, (describe the Project in the space below or in an attachment) Per Design Professional's Proposal attached, including the Project Scope as the preparation of plans and documents for the renovation and an approximately 3,000 square feet building addition to the existing Denton Senior Center, located at 509 N. Bell Avenue, Denton,TX. Exterior site work will include minimal grading, landscaping, and irrigation as required by the building expansion and landscaping ordinances. The City will renovate and expand the existing parking lot under separate contract. SECTION 2 COMPENSATION The Owner shall compensate the. Design Professional as follows: 2.1 BASIC SERVICES 2.1.1 For Basic Services the total compensation for Architectural Services : $130,000,00 Additional Services Fee Allowances: Topographic, Tree & Utility Surve : $10,000.00 y Geotechnical Survey: $5,000.00 2.1.2 Progress payments for Basic Services shall be paid in the following percentages for of the total compensation for the Basic Services satisfactorily completed at the end of the following phases of the Proj ect: Page 1 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Loca1 SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRW Senior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement Architect Engineer 12~11~07.doc Programming 5 Schematic Design 15% Design Development 15% Construction Documents 40% Bidding 5% Construction Administration 20% Total 100% 2.2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 2.2.1 Compensation for Additional Services is as follows: Principals Proj ect Director Proj ect Manager Proj ect Architect Architect Technicial Clerical Staff $195.00 per hour 170.00 per hour 145.00 per hour 125.00 per hour 110.00 per hour 85.00 per hour 65.00 per hour 2.2.2 Compensation for Additional Services of consultants, including additional structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services shall be based on a multiple of 1.1 times the amounts billed to the Design Professional for such additional services. 2.3 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Reimbursable Expenses shall be a multiple of 1.0 times the expenses incurred by the Design Professional, the Design Professional's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project as defined in the General Conditions but not to exceed a total of $6,000 without the prior written approval of the Owner. ~ ~~~ Page 2 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRW Senior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement .Architect Engineer 12-11-07.doc SECTION 3 ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement includes this executed agreement and the following documents all of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as if fully set forth herein: 1. City of Denton General Conditions to Agreement for Architectural or Engineering Services. 2. The Design Professional's Proposal 3. Attachments through This Agreement is signed by the parties hereto effective as of the date first above written. CITY OF DENTON BY: GEORGE C. CAMPBELL CITY MANAGER ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: EDWIN M. SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY BY: BROWN W 0 ARCHITECTS, INC. BY: Firm's Officer/Representative WITNESS: w BY: Garry v~dR~~ Page 3 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRVVARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Internet Filesl0LI~8AIBRW Seiuor Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement .Architect Engineer 12~11~07.doc CITY OF DENTON GENERAL CONDITIONS TO AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING SERVICES ARTICLE 1. ARCHITECT OR ENGIlVEER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 The Architect or Engineer's services consist of those services for the Project (as defined in the agreement (the "Agreement") and proposal (the "Proposal") to which these General Conditions are attached) performed by the .Architect or Engineer (hereinafter called the "Design Professional") or Design Professional's employees and consultants as enumerated in Articles 2 and 3 of these General Conditions as modified by the Agreement and Proposal (the "Services"). 1.2 The Design Professional will perform all Services as an independent contractor to the prevailing professional standards consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions, including reasonable, informed judgments and prompt timely actions (the "Degree of Care"). The .Services shall be performed as expeditiously as is consistent with the Degree of Care. necessary for the orderly progress of the Project. Upon request of the Owner, the Design Professional shall submit for the Owner's approval a schedule for the performance of the Services which maybe adjusted as the Project proceeds, and shall include allowances for periods of time required for the Owner's review and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. Time limits established by this schedule and approved by the Owner shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Design Professional or Owner, and any adjustments to this schedule shall be mutually acceptable to both parties. ARTICLE 2 SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES 2.1 BASIC SERVICES DEFINED The Design Professional's Basic Services consist of those described in Sections 2.2 through 2.6 of these General Conditions and include without limitation normal structural, civil, mechanical and electrical engineering services and to produce a complete and accurate set of Construction Documents, as described by and required in Section 2.4. The Basic Services may be modified by the Agreement. 2.2 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE 2.2.1 The Design Professional, in consultation with the Owner, shall develop a written program for the Project to ascertain Owner's needs and to establish the requirements for the Project. 2.2.2 The Design Professional shall provide a preliminary evaluation of the Owner's program, construction schedule and construction budget requirements, each in terms of the other, subject to the limitations set forth in Subsection 5.2.1. 2.23 The Design Professional shall review with the Owner alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project. 2.2.4 Based on the mutually agreed-upon program, schedule and construction budget requirements, the Design Professional shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Schematic Design Documents consisting of drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of Project components. The Schematic Design shall contemplate compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2.2.5 The Design Professional shall submit to the Owner a preliminary detailed estimate of Construction Cost based on current area, volume or other unit costs and which indicates the cost of each category of work involved in constructing the Project and establishes an elapsed time factor for the period of time from the commencement to the completion of construction. 2.3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 23.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents and any adjustments authorized by the Owner in the program, schedule or construction budget, the Design Professional shall prepare for approval by the Owner, Design Development Documents consisting of drawings and other documents to fix and describe the size and .character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, materials and such other elements as may be appropriate, which shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. Notwithstanding Owner's approval of the documents, Design Professional represents that the Documents and specifications will be sufficient and adequate to fulfill the purposes of the Project. 23.2 The Design Professional shall advise the Owner of any adjustments to the preliminary estimate of Construction Cost in a further Detailed Statement as described in Section 2.2.5. 2.4 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 2.4.1 Based on the approved Design Development Documents and any further adjustments in the scope or quality of the Project or in the construction budget authorized by the Owner, the Design Professional shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Construction Documents consisting of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail requirements for the construction of the Project, which shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2.4.2 The Design Professional shall assist the Owner in the preparation of the necessary bidding or procurement information, bidding or procurement forms, the Conditions of the contract, and the form of Agreement between the Owner and contractor. 2.4.3 The Design Professional shall advise the Owner of any adjustments to previous prelminary estimates of Construction Cost indicated by changes in requirements or general market conditions. 2.4.4 The Design Professional shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing docmnents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 2.5 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROCUREMENT 2.5.1 The Design Professional, following the Owner's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest preliminary detailed estimate of Construction Cost, shall assist the Owner in procuring a construction contract for the Project through any procurement method that is legally applicable to the Project including without Page 4 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRWSeriior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement Architect Engineer 12-11-07.doe limitation, the competitive sealed bidding process. Although the Owner will consider the advice of the Design Professional, the award of the construction contract is in the sole discretion of the Owner. 2.5.2 If the construction contract ainowlt for the Project exceeds the total construction cost of the Project as set forth in the approved Detailed Statement of Probable Construction Costs of the Project submitted by the Design Professional, then the Design Professional, at its sole cost and expense, will revise the Construction Documents as maybe required by the Owner to reduce or modify the quantity or quality of the work so that the total construction cost of the Project will not exceed the total construction cost set forth in the approved Detailed Statement of Probable Construction Costs. 2.6 CONSTRUCTION PHASE ®ADMINISTRATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 2.61 The Design Professional's responsibility to provide Basic Services for the Construction Phase under this Agreement commences with the award of the Contract for Construction and terminates at the issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate for Payment, unless extended under the terms of Subsection 8.3.2. 2.6.2 The Design Professional shall provide detailed administration of the Contract for Construction as set forth below. For design professionalss the administration shall also be in accordance with AIA document A201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, current as of the date of the Agreement as may be amended by the City of Denton special conditions, unless otherwise provided in the Agreement. For engineers the achninistration shall also be in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction by the North Central Texas Council of Governments, current as of the date of the Agreement, unless otherwise provided in the Agreement. 2.6.3 Construction Phase duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of the Design Professional shall not be restricted, modified or extended without written agreement of the Owner and Design Professional, 2.6.4 The Design Professional shall be a representative of and shall advise and consult with the Owner (1) during construction, and (2) at the Owner's direction from time to time during the correction, or warranty period described in the Contract for Construction. The Design Professional shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in the Agreement and these General Conditions, unless otherwise modified by written instrument. 2.6.5 The Design Professional shall observe the constn~ction site at least one time a month, and as necessary during construction , and as reasonably necessary while construction is not in progress, to become familiar with the progress and quality of the work completed and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner indicating that the work when completed will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. Design Professional shall provide Owner a written report subsequent to each on-site visit. On the basis of on-site observations the Design Professional shall keep the Owner informed of the progress and quality of the work, and shall exercise the Degree of Care and diligence in discovering and promptly reporting to the Owner any observable defects or deficiencies in the work of Contractor or any subcontractors. The Design Professional represents that he will follow Degree of Care in performing all Services under the Agreement. The Design Professional shall promptly correct any defective designs or specifications famished by the Design Professional at no cost to the Owner. The Owner's approval, acceptance, use of or payment for all or any part of the Design Professional's Services hereunder or of the Project itself shall in no way alter the Design Professional's obligations or the Owner's rights hereunder. 2.6.6 The Design Professional shall not have control over or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work. The Design Professional shall not be responsible for the Contractor's schedules or failure to carry out the work in accordance with the Contract Documents except insofar as such failure may result from Design Professional's negligent acts or omis- sions. The Design Professional shall not have control over or charge of acts or omissions of the Contractor, Subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons performing portions of the work. 2.6.7 The Design Professional shall at all times have access to the work wherever it is in preparation or progress, 2.6.8 Except as may otherwise be provided in the Contract Documents or when direct communications have been specially authorized, the Owner and Contractor shall communicate through the Design Professional. Cormnunications byand with the Design Professional's consultants shall be through the Design Professional. 2.b.9 Based on the Design Professional's observations at the site of the work and evaluations of the Contractor's Applications for Payment, the Design Professional shall review and certify the amounts due the Contractor. 2.6.10 The Design Professional's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner, based on the Design Professional's observations at the site as provided in Subsection 2.6.5 and on the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment, that the work has progressed to the point indicated and that the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. The foregoing representations are subject to minor deviations from the Contract Documents cor- rectable prior`to completion and to specific qualifications expressed by the Design Professional. The issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall further constitute a representation that the Conhactor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. However, the issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation that the Design Professional has (1) reviewed construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or (2) ascertained how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the Contract Sum. 2.6.11 The Design Professional shall have the responsibility and authority to reject work which does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Design Professional considers it necessary or advisable for implementation of the intent of the Contract Documents, the Design Professional will have authority to require additional inspection or testing of the work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Design Professional nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Design Professional to the Contractor, Subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, their agents or employees or other persons performing portions of the work. 2.6.12 The Design Professional shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon Contractor's submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples for the purpose of (1) determining compliance- with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances and codes; and (2) determining whether or not the work, when completed, will be in compliance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Design Professional shall act with such reasonable promptness to cause no delay in the work or in the construction of the Owner or of separate contractors, while allowing sufficient time in the Design Professional's professional judgment to permit adequate review. Review of such submittals is not conducted for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other details such as dunensions and quantities or for substantiating instructions for installation or performance of equipment or systems designed by the Contractor, all of which remain the responsibility of the Contractor to the extent required by the Contract Documents. The Desig<7 Professional's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or, unless otherwise specifically stated by the Design Professional, of construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. The Design Professional's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. When professional certification of performance characteristics Page 5 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRWSemior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement Architect Engineer 12-11-07.doc of materials, systems or equipment is required by the Contract Documents, the Design Professional shall be entitled to rely upon such certification to establish that the materials, systems or equipment will meet the performance criteria required by the Contract Docwnents. 2.6.13 The Design Professional shall prepare Change Orders and Construction Change Directives, with supporting documentation and data if deemed necessary by the Design Professional as provided in Subsections 3.1.1 and 3.3.3, for the Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents, and may authorize minor changes in the work not involving an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Tune which are not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. 2.6.14 On behalf of the Owner, the Design Professional shall conduct inspections to determine the dates of Substantial Completion and Final Completion, and if requested by the Owner shall issue Certificates of Substantial and Final Completion. The Design Professional will receive and review written guarantees and related documents required by the Contract for Construction to be assembled by the Contractor and shall issue a final certificate for Payment upon compliance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. 2.6.15 The Design Professional shall interpret and provide recommendations on matters concerning performance of the Owner and Contractor under the requirements of the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Design Professional's response to such requests shall be made with reasonable promptness and within any time limits agreed upon. 2.6.16 Interpretations and decisions of the Design Professional shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and initial decisions, the Design Professional shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by both Owner and Contractor, and shall not be liable for results or interpretations or decisions so rendered in good faith in accordance with all the provisions of this Agreement and in the absence of negligence. 2.6.17 The Design Professional shall render written decisions within a reasonable time on all claims, disputes or other matters in question between the Owner and Contractor relating to the execution or progress of the work as provided in the Contract Documents. 2.6.18 The Design Professional (1) shall render services under the Agreement in accordance with the Degree of Care; (2) will reimburse the Owner for all damages caused by the defective designs the Design Professional prepares; and (3) by acknowledging pa}nnent by the Owner of any fees due, shall not be released from any rights the Owner may have under the Agreement or duninish any of the Design Professional's obligations thereunder. 2.6.19 The Design Professional shall provide the Owner with four sets of reproducible prints showing all significant changes to the Construction Documents during the Construction Phase. ARTICLE 3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.1 GENERAL 3.1.1 The services described in this Article 3 are not included in Basic Services unless so identified in the Agreement or Proposal, and they shall be paid for by the Owner as provided in the Agreement, in addition to the compensation for Basic Services. The services described under Sections 32 and 3.4 shall only be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the Owner. If services described under Contingent Additional Services in Section 3.3 are required due to circumstances beyond the Design Professional's control, the Design Professional shall notify the Owner in writing and shall not commence such additional services until it receives written approval from the Owner to proceed. If the Owner indicates in writing that all or part of such Contingent Additional Services are not required, the Design Professional shall have no obligation to provide those services. Owner will be responsible for compensating the Design Professional for Contingent Additional Services only if they are not required due to the negligence or fault of Design Professional. 3.2 PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES 3.21 If more extensive representation at the site than is described in Subsection 2.6.5 is required, the Design Professional shall provide one or more Project Representatives toassist in canyingout such additional on-site responsibilities. 3.2.2 Project Representatives shall be selected, employed and directed by the Design Professional, and the Design Professional shall be compensated therefor as agreed by the Owner and Design Professional. 3.3 CONTINGENT ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.3.1 Making material revisions in Drawings, Specifications or other documents when such revisions are: 1. inconsistent with approvals or instructions previously given by the Owner, including revisions made necessary by adjustments in the Owner's program or Proj ect budget; 2. required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such documents, or 3. due to changes required as a result of the Owner's failure to render decision in a timely manner. 3.3.2 Providing services required because of significant changes in the Project including, but not limited to, size, quality, complexity, or the Owner's schedule, except for services required under Subsection 2.5.2. 3.3.3 Preparing Drawings, Specifications and other documentation and supporting data, and providing other services in connection with Change Orders and Conshuction Change Directives. 3.3.4 Providing consultation concerning replacement of work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, and furnishing services required in connection with the replacement of such work. 3.3.5 Providing services made necessary by the default of the Contractor, by major defects or deficiencies in the work of the Contractor, or by failure of performance of either the Owner or Contractor under the Contract for Construction. Page 6 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCHILocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRWScnior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement Architect Engineer 12-11-07.doc 3.3.6 Providing services in evaluating an extensive mm~ber of claims submitted by the Contractor or others in connection with the work 3.3.7 Providing services in connection with a public hearing, arbitration proceeding or legal proceeding except where the Design Professional is party thereto 3.3.8 Providing services in addition to those required by Article 2 for preparing documents for alternate, separate or sequential bids or providing services in connection with bidding or construction prior to the completion of the Constn~ction Documents Phase. 33.9 Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement, Proposal or these General Conditions to the contrary, all services described in this Article 3 that are caused or necessitated in whole or in part due to the negligent act or omission of the Design Professional shall be performed by the Design Professional as a part of the Basic Services under the Agreement with no additional compensation above and beyond the compensation due the Design Professional for the Basic Services. The intervening or concurrent negligence of the Owner shall not limit the Design Professional's obligations under this Subsection 3,3.9. 3.4 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.4.1 Providing financial feasibility or other special studies. 3.4.2 Providing planning surveys, site evaluations or comparative studies of prospective sites. 3.4.3 Providing special surveys, enviromnental studies and submissions required for approvals of govervnental authorities or others having jurisdiction over the Project. 3.4.4 Providing services relative to future facilities, systems and equipment. 3.4.5 Providing services to investigate existing conditions or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof. 3.4.6 Providing services to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished by the Owner. 3.4.7 Providing coordination of construction performed by separate contractors or by the Owner's own forces and coordination of services required in connection with construction performed and equipment supplied by the Owner. 3.4.8 Providing detailed quantity surveys or inventories of material, equipment and labor. 3.4.9 Providing analyses of operating and maintenance costs. 3.4.10 Making investigations, inventories of materials or equipment, or valuations and detailed appraisals of existing facilities, 3.4.12 Providing assistance in the utilization of equipment or systems such as testing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance and consultation during operation. 3.4.13 Providing interior design and similar services required for or in connection with the selection, procurement or installation of furniture, furnishings and related equipment. 3.4.14 Providing services other than as provided in Section 2.6.4, a$er issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate for Payment and expiration of the Warranty period of the Contract for Construction. 3.4.15 Providing services of consultants for other than architectural, civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering portions of the Project provided as a part of Basic Services. 3.4.16 Providing any other services not otherwise included in this Agreement or not customarily famished in accordance with generally accepted architectural practice. 3.4.17 Preparing a set of reproducible record drawings in addition to those required by Subsection 2.6.19, showing significant changes in the work made during con- structionbased on marked-upprints, drawings and other data furnished by the Contractor to the Design Professional, 3.4.18 Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement, Proposal or these General Conditions to the contrary, all services described in this Article 3 that are caused or necessitated in whole or in part due to the negligent act or omission of the Design Professional shall be performed by the Design Professional as a part of the Basic Services under the Agreement with no additional compensation above and beyond the compensation due the Design Professional for the Basic Services. The intervening or concurrent negligence of the Owner shall not limit the Design Professional's obligations under this Subsection 3.4.18. .ARTICLE 4 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 The Owner shall consult with the Design Professional regarding requirements for the Project, including (1) the Owner's objectives, (2) schedule and design constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relationships, flexibility, expendability, special equipment, systems and site requirements, as more speci- ficallydescribed in Subsection 2.2.1. 4.2 The Owner shall establish and update an overall budget for the Project, including the Construction Cost, the Owner's other costs and reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. 4.3 If requested by the Design Professional, the Owner shall furnish evidence that financial arrangements have been made to fulfill the Owner's obligations under this Agreement. Page 7 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Loca1 SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRW Senior°Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement .Architect Engineer 12-11-07. doc 4.4 The Owner shall designate a representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner or such authorized representative shall render decisions in a timely manner pertaining to documents submitted by the Design Professional in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Design Professional's services, 4.5 Where applicable, the Owner shall fitnush surveys describing physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project, and a written legal description of the site. The surveys and legal information shall include, as applicable, grades and lines. of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property and structures; adjacent drainage; rights-of way, restrictions, easements, encroaclvnents, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions and necessary data pertaining to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and information concealing available utility services and lines, both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. All the information on the survey shall be referenced to a project benclunark: The Design Professional shall provide a Topographic, Tree, Utility and Easement Survey as necessary for the building addition, 4.6 The Design Professional shall provide geotechnical investigation tests for the building addition Such services may include but are not lllnited to test borings, test pits, deterninations of soil bearing values, percolation tests, evaluations of hazardous materials, ground corrosion and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for anticipating sub-soil conditions, with reports and appropriate professional recorn~nendations. 4.b.1 The Owner shall funush the services of other consultants when such services are reasonably required by the scope of the Project and are requested by the Design Professional and are not retained by the Design Professional as part of its Basic Services or Additional Services. 4.7 When not a part of the Additional Services, the Owner shall funllsh structural, mechanical, chemical, air and water pollution tests, tests of hazardous materials, and other laboratory and environmental tests, inspections and reports required by law or the Contract Documents. 4.8 The Owner shall famish all legal, accounting and insurance counseling services as may be necessary at any time for the Project, including auditing services the Owner may require to verify the Contractor's Applications for Payment or to ascertain how or for what purposes the Contractor has used the money paid by or on behalf of the Owner. 4.9 The services, information, surveys and reports required by Owner under Sections 4.5 through 4.8 shall be famished at the Owner's expense, and the Design Professional shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof in the absence of any negligence on the pact of the Design Professional. 4.10 The Owner shall give prompt written notice to the Design Professional if the Owner becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project or nonconformance with the Contract Documents. 4.11 Design Professional shall propose language for certificates or certifications to be requested of the Design Professional or Design Professional's consultants and shall submit such to the Owner for review and approval at least fourteen (14) days prior to execution. The Owner agrees not to request certifications that would require knowledge or services beyond the scope of the Agreement. ARTICLE 5 CONSTRUCTION COST 5.1 CONSTRUCTION COST DEFINED . S.LI The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of all elements of the Project designed or specified by the Design Professional. 5.1.2 The Construction Cost shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and materials furnished by the Owner and equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the Design Professional, plus a reasonable allowance for the Contractor's overhead and profit. In addition, a reasonable allowance for con- tingencies shall be included for market conditions at the time of bidding and for changes in the work during construction. 5.1.3 Construction Cost does not include the compensation of the Design Professional and Design Professional's consultants, the costs of the land, rights-of way, financing or other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Article 4. 5.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST 5.2.1 Evaluations of the Owner's Project budget, preliminary estimates of Construction Cost and detailed estimates of Construction Cost prepared by the Design Professional represent the Design Professional's best judgment as a design professional familiar with the consnuction industry. It is recognized, however, that neither the Design Professional nor the Owner has control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, the Design Professional cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or cost proposals will not vary from the Owner's Project budget or from any estimate of Construction Cost or evaluation prepared or agreed to by the Design Professional. 5.2.2 No fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be established as a condition of the Agreement by the famishing, proposal or establishment of a Project budget, unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed by the parties thereto. If such a fixed limit has been established, the Design Professional shall be permitted to include contingencies for design, bidding and price escalation, to detemline what materials, equipment, component systems and types of construction are to be included in the Contract Documents, to make reasonable adjustments in the scope of the Project and to include in the Contract Dacurnents alternate bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed limit. Fixed limits, if any, shall be increased in the amount of an increase in the Contract Surn occurring after execution of the Contract for Construction. 5.2.3 If the Procurement Phase has not cormnenced within 90 days after the Design Professional submits the Construction Documents to the Owner, any Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be adjusted to reflect changes in the general level of prices in the construction industry between the date of submission of the Construction Documents to the Owner and the date on which proposals are sought. ARTICLE 6 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 6.1 The Drawings, Specifications and other documents prepared by the Design Professional for this Project are instruments of the Design Professional's service and shall become the property of the Owner upon termination or completion of the Agreement. The Design Professional is entitled to retain copies of all such docwnents. Such documents are intended only be applicable to this Project, and Owner's use of such documents in other projects shall be at Owner's sole risk and expense. In the event the Page 8 C:1Documents and Settingslgaly.BRWARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Interlet Files10L1~8A1Bl~W Senior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement .Architect Engineer 12-11-07.doc Owner uses any of the information or materials developed pursuant to the Agreement in another project or for other purposes than are specified in the Agreement, the Design Professional is released from any and all liability relating to their use in that proj ect 6.2 Submission or distribution of documents to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Design Professional's reserved rights. ARTICLE 7 TERMINATION, SUSPENSION OR ABANDONMENT 7.1 The Design Professional may terminate the Agreement upon not less than thirty days written notice should the Owner fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of the Agreement through no fault of the Design Professional. Owner may terminate the Agreement or any phase thereof with or without cause upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Design Professional. All work and labor being performed under the Agreement shall cease immediately upon Design Professional's receipt of such notice. Before the end of the thirty (30) day period, Design Professional shall invoice the Owner for all work it satisfactorily performed prior to the receipt of such notice. No amount shall be due for lost or anticipated profits. All plans, field surveys, and other data related to the Project shall become property of the Owner upon termination of the Agreement and shall be promptly delivered to the Owner in a reasonably organized form. Should Owner subsequently contract with a new Design Professional for continuation of services on the Project, Design Professional shall cooperate in providing information, 7.2 If the Project is suspended by the Owner for more than 30 consecutive days, the Design Professional shall be compensated for services satisfactorily performed prior to notice of such suspension. When the Project is resumed, the Design Professional's compensation shall be equitably adjusted to provide for expenses incurred in the intenuption and resumption of the Design Professional's services. 7.3 The Agreement may be terminated by the Owner upon not less than seven days written notice to .the Design Professional in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. If the Project is abandoned by the Owner for more than 90 consecutive days, the Design Professional or the Owner may terminate the Agreement by giving written notice. 7.4 Failure of the Owner to make payments to the Design Professional for work satisfactorily completed in accordance with the Agreement shall be considered substantial non- perfonnanceand cause for termination. 7.5 If the Owner fails to make payment to Design Professional within thirty (30) days of receipt of a statement for services properly and satisfactorily performed, the Design Professional may, upon seven days written notice to the Owner, suspend performance of services under the Agreement. 7.6 In the event of termination not the fault of the Design Professional, the Design Professional shall be compensated for services properly and satisfactorily performed prior to termination. ARTICLE 8 PAYMENTS TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL 8.1 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 8.1.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct salaries of the Design Professional°s personnel engaged on the Project and the portion of the cost of their mandatory and customary contributions and benefits related thereto, such as employment taxes and other statutory employee benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions and similar contributions and benefits. 8.2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 8.2.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic and Additional Services and include expenses incurred by the Design Professional and Design Professional's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project, as identified in the following Clauses. 8.2.1.1 Expense of transportation in connection with the Project; expenses in connection with authorized out-of town travel; long-distance communications; and fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 8.2.1.2 Expense of reproductions (except the reproduction of the sets of documents referenced in Subsection 2.6.19), postage and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents. 8.2.1.3 If authorized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. 8.2.1.4 Expense of renderings, models and mock-ups requested by the Owner. ... 8.2.1.6 Other expenses that are approved in advance in writing by the Owner. 8.3 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF BASIC SERVICES 8.3.1 Payments for Basic Services shall be made monthly and, where applicable, shall be in proportion to services performed within each phase of service, on the basis set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement and the schedule of work. 8.3.2 if and to the extent that the time initially established in the Agreement is exceeded or extended through no fault of the Design Professional, compensation for any services rendered during the additional period of time shall be computed in the manner set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement. 8.3.3 When compensation is based on a percentage of Construction Cost and any portions of the Project are deleted or otherwise not constructed, compensation for those portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are performed on those portions, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement based on (1) the lowest bona fide bid or (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent preliminary estimate of Construction Cost or detailed estimate of Construction Cost for such portions of the Project. 8.4 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES Page 9 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Internet FileslOLKSAIBRWSemior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement Architect Engineer 12-11-07.doc 8.4.1 Payments on account of the Design Professional's Additional Services and for Reimbursable Expenses shall be made monthly within 30 days after the presentation to the Owner of the Design Professional's statement of services rendered or expenses incurred, 8.5 PAYMENTS WITHHELD No deductions shall be made from the Design Professional's compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damages or other sums withheld fiom payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the work other than those for which the Design Professional is responsible, 8.6 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS Design Professional shall make available to Owner or Owner's authorized representative records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses pertaining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of a multiple of Direct Personnel Expense for inspection and copying during regular business hours for three years after the date of the final Certificate of Payment, or until any litigation related to the Project is final, whichever date is later. ARTICLE 9 INDEMNITY 9.1 The Design. Professional shall indemnify and save and hold harmless the Owner and its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to court costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by the Owner, and including, without limitation, damages for bodily and personal injury, death and property damage, resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Design Professional or its officers, shareholders, agents, or employees in the performance of the Agreement. 9.2 Nothing herein shall be construed to create a liability to any person who is not a party to the Agreement, and nothing herein shall waive any of the parties' defenses, both at law or equity, to any claim, cause of action, or litigation filed by anyone not a party to the Agreement, including the defense of governmental immunity, which defenses are hereby expressly reserved. ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE During the performance of the Services under the Agreement, Design Professional shall maintain the following insurance with an insurance company licensed or authorized to do business in the State of Texas by the State Insurance Commission or any successor agency that has a rating with Best Rate Carriers of at least an A- or above: 10.1 Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and not less than $2,000,000 in the aggregate, and with property damage limits of not less than $100,000 for each occurrence and not less than $250,000 in the aggregate. 10.2 Automobile Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and not less than $500,000 for each accident, and with property damage limits of not less than $100,000 for each accident. 10.3 Worker's Compensation Insurance in accordance with statutory requirements, and Employers' Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $100,000 for each accident including occupational disease. 10.4 Deleted 10.5 The Design Professional shall famish insurance certificates or insurance policies to the Owner evidencing insurance in compliance with this Article 10 at the time of the execution of the Agreement. The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall name the Owner as an additional insured, the Workers' Compensation policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the Owner, and each policy shall contain a provision that such insurance shall not be canceled or modified without thirty (30) days' prior written notice to Owner and Design Professional. In such event, the Design Professional shall, prior to the effective date of the change or cancellation, famish Owner with substitute certificates of insurance meeting the requirements of this Article 10. ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 111 The Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. Venue of any suit or cause of action under the Agreement shall lie exclusively in Denton County, Texas. 11.2 The Owner and Design Professional, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives tothe other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants. of this Agreement. The Design Professional shall not assign its interests in the Agreement without the written consent of the Owner. 11.3 The tern Agreement as used herein includes the executed Agreement, the Proposal, these General Conditions and other attachments referenced in Section 3 of the Agreement which together represent the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and Design Professional and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. The Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and Design Professional. When interpreting the Agreement the executed Agreement, Proposal, these General Conditions and the other attachments referenced in Section 3 of the Agreement shall to the extent that is reasonably possible be read so as to harmonize the provisions. However, should the provisions of these documents be in conflict so that they can not be reasonably harmonized, such documents shall be given priority in the following order: 1. The executed Agreement 2. Attachments referenced in Section 3 of the Agreement other than the Proposal 3. These General Provisions 4. The Proposal 11.4 Nothing contained in the Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the Owner or Design Professional. 11.5 Upon receipt of prior written approval of Owner, the Design Professional shall have the right to include representations ofthe design of the Project, including photographs of the extel~or and interior, among the Design Professional's promotional and professional materials. The Design Professional's materials shall not include the Owner's confidential or proprietary information if the Owner has previously advised the Design Professional in writing of the specific information considered by the Owner to be confi- dential or proprietary. The Owner shall provide professional credit for the Design Professional on the construction sign and in the promotional materials for the Project. Page 10 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRWSemior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement Architect Engineer 12-11-07.doc 11.6 Approval by the Owner shall not constitute, nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Design Professional, its employees, associates, agents, subcontractors, and subconsultants for the accuracy and competency of their designs or other work; nor shall such approval be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the Owner for any defect in the design or other work prepared by the Design Professional, its employees, subcontractors, agents, and consultants. 11.7 All notices, communications, and reports required or permitted under the Agreement shall be personally delivered or mailed to the respective parties by depositing same in the United States mail to the address shown below signature block on the Agreement, certified mail, return receipt requested, unless otherwise specified herein. All notices shall be deemed effective upon receipt by the party to whom such notice is given, or within three (3) days after mailing. 11.8 If any provision of the Agreement is found or deemed by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, it shall be considered severable from the remainder of the Agreement and shall not cause the remainder to be invalid or unenforceable. In such event, the parties shall reform the Agreement to replace such stricken provision with a valid and enforceable provision which comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. 11.9 The Design Professional shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances applicable to the work covered hereunder as they may now read or hereinafter be amended during the term of this Agreement. 11.10 In performing the Services required hereunder, the Design Professional shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age, or physical handicap. 11.11 The captions of the Agreement are for informational purposes only, and shall not in any way affect the substantive terms or conditions of the Agreement. Page 11 C:1Documents and Settingslgary.BRWARCH1Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LK8A1BRW Senior Center Renovation expansion Professional Services Agreement Architect Engineer 12-11,07.doc AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 Questions concerning this acquisition maybe directed DEPARTMENT: Materials Management to Emerson Vorel 349-8274 ACM: Jon Fortune ~TIR.TF,CT Consider adoption of an Ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a two year contract for Mowing for various City departments; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing an effective date (Bid 3926-Two Year Contract for Mowing awarded to the lowest responsible bidder for each section in the annual estimated amount of $373,316.00). BID/RFSP INFORMATION This bid is to provide mowing, color bed maintenance, trimming and edging services for the following City facilities: Class A Medians, Class A City Parks, Class A Libraries, Class B City Parks, Class B City Medians North and South, Class A and B Fire stations, Cemeteries, Solid Waste and Landfill properties Classes A, B, C, Class B Electrical Substations, Water Reclamation Properties Class A and Class C, Code Enforcement Responsive Mowing, Class C Rail Trail Mowing, and miscellaneous mowing per acre as needed. RECOMMENDATION Award to the lowest responsive bidder for each section as listed below: Item# Description Proposal A Class A Medians Proposal B Class A City Parks Proposal C Class A Libraries Proposal C 1 Class A Libraries Proposal D Class B City Parks Proposal E Class B City Medians North Proposal El Class A Medians Alternate Proposal F Class B City Medians South Proposal F 1 Class B Vintage Parkway Alternate Proposal Gl Class Fire Station Mowing Proposal G2 Class Fire Station Bed Maintenance Proposal G3 Class C Alternate Mowing for Fire Stations Proposal H Cemeteries Proposal I Solid Waste & Landfill Class A, B, C Proposal Il Solid Waste Color Beds Proposal J Class A & B Electrical Substations Proposal K Water Reclamation Class A and C Proposal L Code Enforcement (All Sections) Proposal M Class C Rail Trail and Spencer Road VPnr~nr VMC Landscape Services VMC Landscape Services Firehouse 22 Firehouse 22 MET Lawncare MET Lawncare No Award VMC Landscape Services VMC Landscape Services MET Lawncare MET Lawncare MET Lawncare No Bid Awarded VMC Landscape Services VMC Landscape Services MET Lawncare MET Lawncare Brandon's Landscape Service VMC Landscape Services Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED) Proposal Ml Ray Roberts Overlook Mowing and Litter Proposal M2 Hourly Rate for Tractors and Mowers Proposal M3 Hourly Rate for Labor and Trimmer General Mowing Class A MET Lawncare General Mowing Class B MET Lawncare General Mowing Class C MET Lawncare General Mowing Class D MET Lawncare VMC Landscape Services VMC Landscape Services VMC Landscape Services Proposal E 1 (Malone Street islands located at Tulane and Bowling Green) will not be awarded - this area will be maintained by a Keep Denton Beautiful volunteer group. Proposal H will not be awarded due to no bids being received for this section. PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS VMC Landscape Maintenance Dallas, TX MET Lawncare Denton, TX Firehouse 22 Mowing Denton, TX Brandon's Landscape Service Rockwall, TX ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The term of the contract shall be for a period of two years from the date of Council award, with the option to renew at the end of the period. The contract maybe renewed twice for a period not to exceed one year per renewal. Renewal shall be at the sole discretion of the using departments. FISCAL INFORMATION This service will be funded as listed below: Parks and Recreation $266,880.00 402130.7886 Solid Waste $ 41,187.00 660300.7886 Water Reclamation $ 19,515.00 640100.7886 Code Enforcement $ 30,000.00 330001.7886 Electric Substations $ 13,424.00 600400.6528.5920 Overlook Mowing $ 2,310.00 630002.7762 Requisition #s 85320, 85321, 85322, 85311, 85309, 85324 have been entered in the purchasing software system. Agenda Information Sheet January 8, 2008 Page 3 EXHIBITS 1. Bid Tabulation Respectfully submitted: ~~~.~5 Tom Shaw, C.P.M., 349-7100 Purchasing Agent BID #3926 Exhibit 1 DATE: 12/06/07 TWO-YEAR CONTRACT FOR MOWING No. DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR MET Lawncare Brandon's Landscape Service Gary Morgan Enterprises LP dba VMC Landscape Services Firehouse 22 Principle Place of Business: Denton, TX Rockwall, TX Dallas, TX Denton, TX PROPOSALS -ANNUAL BID PRICE A MEDIANS 7 RIGHT-OF-WAYS CLASS A No Bid No Bid $44,608.00 No Bid B CITY PARKS & PUBLIC BUILDINGS CLASS A No Bid No Bid $61,056.00 No Bid C LIBRARIES NORTH & SOUTH BRANCH CLASS A MOWING No Bid $3,484.00 $7,040.00 $4,160.00 C1 NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY BED MAINTENANCE No Bid $9,600.00 $2,336.00 $2,640.00 D CITY PARKS CLASS B $56,900.00 No Bid $140,800.00 No Bid E CITY MEDIANS & RIGHT-OF-WAYS NORTH CLASS B $23,900.00 No Bid $32,620.00 No Bid E1 ALTERNATE FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION - MALONE ISLANDS @ TULANE & BOWLINGREEN $0.00 No Bid $740.00 No Bid F CITY MEDIANS & RIGHT-OF-WAYS SOUTH CLASS B No Bid No Bid $36,120.00 No Bid F1 ALTERNATE FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION -VINTAGE PARKWAY EAST OF BONNNIE BRAE TO HWY 377 No Bid No Bid $3,660.00 No Bid G FIRE STATIONS CLASS A & B (including Bed Maint) G1 OPTION 1 -MOWING $8,940.00 No Bid $14,932.00 $8,824.00 G2 OPTION 2 -BED MAINTENANCE $1,670.00 No Bid $3,868.00 $6,800.00 G3 ALTERNATE ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION - FIRE & POLICE FUTURE TRAINING FACILITY, 80 ACRES TOTAL BID IFR FORA 100FT MOW STRIP ALONG VINTAGE PKWY & BONNIE BRAE. 10 ACRES WILL CALL BASIS -ESTIMATE 5 - 7 CYCLES $1,400.00 No Bid $5,131.00 No Bid H CEMETERIES CLASS B No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL CLASS A, B & C No Bid No Bid $40,003.00 No Bid 11 OPTIONAL BED MAINTENANCE PLUS SEASONAL COLOR PLANTINGS No Bid No Bid $1,184.00 No Bid J ELECTRICAL SUBSTATIONS CLASS A & B $13,424.00 $23,590.00 $27,884.00 No Bid K WATER RECLAMATION CLASS A & C $19,515.00 No Bid $31,123.00 No Bid L CODE ENFORCEMENT -SEE NEXT PAGE M RAIL TRAIL CLASS C No Bid No Bid $19,250.00 No Bid M1 ALTERNATE ITEM FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION -LAKE RAY ROBERTS OUTLOOK (NORTH END OF GREENBELT), MOW AND LITTER REMOVAL No Bid No Bid $2,310.00 No Bid HOURLY RATE FOR SPECIAL CALL OUT REQUEST M2 HOURLY RATE FOR TRACTOR & MOWERS No Bid No Bid $90.00 No Bid M3 HOURLY RATE FOR LABOR AND TRIMMER No Bid No Bid $28.00 No Bid BID #3926 Exhibit 1 DATE: 12/06/07 TWO-YEAR CONTRACT FOR MOWING No. DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR MET Lawncare Brandon's Landscape Service Gary Morgan Enterprises LP dba VMC Landscape Services Firehouse 22 Principle Place of Business: Denton, TX Rockwall, TX Dallas, TX Denton, TX GENERAL MOWING SERVICE AS NEEDED BY THE CITY -PRICE PER ACRE PER CYCLE CLASS A $30.00 $55.00 $75.00 No Bid CLASS B $30.00 $55.00 $90.00 No Bid CLASS C $45.00 $55.00 $105.00 No Bid CLASS D $45.00 $55.00 $115.00 No Bid *Per acre per cycle price will be prorated for smaller parcels as determined by the City PROPOSAL L -CODE ENFORCEMENT MOWING OF PARCELS WITH UNRESTRICTED ACCESS -A Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (up to 3') per lot price No Bid $60.00 No Bid No Bid -A Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (over 3'} per lot price No Bid $65.00 No Bid No Bid II-A Parcels of land 10, 001 square feet to 1 acre (up to 3'} per lot price No Bid $65.00 No Bid No Bid II-A Parcels of land 10, 001 square feet to 1 acre (over 3'} per lot price No Bid $70.00 No Bid No Bid III-A Parcels of land more than 1 acre (up to 3') per acre price No Bid $70.00 No Bid No Bid III-A Parcels of land more than 1 acre (over 3'} per lot price No Bid $75.00 No Bid No Bid MOWING OF PARCELS WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS (EQUIPMENT MUST FIT THROUGH 3 FT. OPENING) -B Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (up to 3') per lot price No Bid $65.00 No Bid No Bid -B Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (over 3'} per lot price No Bid $70.00 No Bid No Bid II-B Parcels of land 10,001 square feet to 1 acre (up to 3') per lot price No Bid $70.00 No Bid No Bid II-B Parcels of land 10,001 square feet to 1 acre (over 3') per lot price No Bid $75.00 No Bid No Bid III-B Parcels of land more than 1 acre (up to 3') per acre price No Bid $80.00 No Bid No Bid III-B Parcels of land more than 1 acre (over 3'} per lot price No Bid $90.00 No Bid No Bid TRASH AND DEBRIS REMOVAL IV Trash & Debris removal based on cubic yard calculated by the COD Solid Waste formula No Bid $80.00 No Bid No Bid Hourly rate for labor & trimmer on specialty rate per Contract Terms and Conditions #4 No Bid $251Hr. per man No Bid No Bid Bid Bond Yes Yes Yes Yes **TruGreen Landcare qualified their bid, and therefore is considered non-responsive. ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A TWO YEAR CONTRACT FOR MOWING FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (BID 3926-TWO YEAR CONTRACT FOR MOWING AWARDED TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR EACH SECTION IN THE ANNUAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF $373,316.00). WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of State law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" on file in the office of the City Purchasing Agent, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO VENDOR AMOUNT 3926 Proposal A VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal B VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal C Firehouse 22 Exhibit A 3926 Proposal Cl Firehouse 22 Exhibit A 3926 Proposal D MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Proposal E MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Proposal F VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal Fl VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3 926 Proposal G 1 MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Proposal G2 MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Proposal G3 MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Proposal I VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal Il VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal J MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Proposal K MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Proposal L Brandon's Landscape Service Exhibit A 3926 Proposal M VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal Ml VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal M2 VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3926 Proposal M3 VMC Landscape Services Exhibit A 3 926 Gen Mowing Class A MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3 926 Gen Mowing Class B MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3 926 Gen Mowing Class C MET Lawncare Exhibit A 3926 Gen Mowing Class D MET Lawncare Exhibit A SECTION 2. By the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to pur- chase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION 3. Should the City and the winning bidder(s) wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute a written contract in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related documents and to extend that contract as determined to be advantageous to the City of Denton. SECTION 4. By the acceptance and approval of the above enumerated bids, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 2008. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER VVALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: 3-ORD-BID 3926 BID #3926 Exhibit A DATE: 12/06/07 TWO-YEAR CONTRACT FOR MOWING No. DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR MET Lawncare Brandon's Landscape Service Gary Morgan Enterprises LP dba VMC Landscape Services Firehouse 22 Principle Place of Business: Denton, TX Rockwall, TX Dallas, TX Denton, TX PROPOSALS -ANNUAL BID PRICE A MEDIANS 7 RIGHT-OF-WAYS CLASS A $44,608.00 B CITY PARKS & PUBLIC BUILDINGS CLASS A $61,056.00 C LIBRARIES NORTH & SOUTH BRANCH CLASS A MOWING $4,160.00 C1 NORTH BRANCH LIBRARY BED MAINTENANCE $2,640.00 D CITY PARKS CLASS B $56,900.00 E CITY MEDIANS & RIGHT-OF-WAYS NORTH CLASS B $23,900.00 F CITY MEDIANS & RIGHT-OF-WAYS SOUTH CLASS B $36,120.00 F1 ALTERNATE FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION -VINTAGE PARKWAY EAST OF BONNNIE BRAE TO HWY 377 $3,660.00 G FIRE STATIONS CLASS A & B (including Bed Maint) G1 OPTION 1 -MOWING $8,940.00 G2 OPTION 2 -BED MAINTENANCE $1,670.00 G3 ALTERNATE ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION - FIRE & POLICE FUTURE TRAINING FACILITY, 80 ACRES TOTAL BID IFR FORA 100FT MOW STRIP ALONG VINTAGE PKWY & BONNIE BRAE. 10 ACRES WILL CALL BASIS -ESTIMATE 5 - 7 CYCLES $1,400.00 SOLID WASTE/LANDFILL CLASS A, B & C $40,003.00 11 OPTIONAL BED MAINTENANCE PLUS SEASONAL COLOR PLANTINGS $1,184.00 J ELECTRICAL SUBSTATIONS CLASS A & B $13,424.00 K WATER RECLAMATION CLASS A & C $19,515.00 L CODE ENFORCEMENT -SEE NEXT PAGE M RAIL TRAIL CLASS C $19,250.00 M1 ALTERNATE ITEM FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION -LAKE RAY ROBERTS OUTLOOK (NORTH END OF GREENBELT), MOW AND LITTER REMOVAL $2,310.00 HOURLY RATE FOR SPECIAL CALL OUT REQUEST M2 HOURLY RATE FOR TRACTOR & MOWERS $90.00 M3 HOURLY RATE FOR LABOR AND TRIMMER $28.00 BID #3926 Exhibit A DATE: 12/06/07 TWO-YEAR CONTRACT FOR MOWING No. DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR MET Lawncare Brandon's Landscape Service Gary Morgan Enterprises LP dba VMC Landscape Services Firehouse 22 Principle Place of Business: Denton, TX Rockwall, TX Dallas, TX Denton, TX GENERAL MOWING SERVICE AS NEEDED BY THE CITY -PRICE PER ACRE PER CYCLE CLASS A $30.00 CLASS B $30.00 CLASS C $45.00 CLASS D $45.00 *Per acre per cycle price will be prorated for smaller parcels as determined by the City PROPOSAL L -CODE ENFORCEMENT MOWING OF PARCELS WITH UNRESTRICTED ACCESS -A Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (up to 3') per lot price $60.00 -A Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (over 3'} per lot price $65.00 II-A Parcels of land 10, 001 square feet to 1 acre (up to 3'} per lot price $65.00 II-A Parcels of land 10, 001 square feet to 1 acre (over 3'} per lot price $70.00 III-A Parcels of land more than 1 acre (up to 3') per acre price $70.00 III-A Parcels of land more than 1 acre (over 3'} per lot price $75.00 MOWING OF PARCELS WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS (EQUIPMENT MUST FIT THROUGH 3 FT. OPENING) -B Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (up to 3') per lot price $65.00 -B Parcels of land up to 10,000 square feet (over 3'} per lot price $70.00 II-B Parcels of land 10,001 square feet to 1 acre (up to 3') per lot price $70.00 II-B Parcels of land 10,001 square feet to 1 acre (over 3') per lot price $75.00 III-B Parcels of land more than 1 acre (up to 3') per acre price $80.00 III-B Parcels of land more than 1 acre (over 3'} per lot price $90.00 TRASH AND DEBRIS REMOVAL IV Trash & Debris removal based on cubic yard calculated by the COD Solid Waste formula $80.00 Hourly rate for labor & trimmer on specialty rate per Contract Terms and Conditions #4 $251Hr. per man Bid Bond Yes Yes Yes Yes **TruGreen Landcare qualified their bid, and therefore is considered non-responsive. AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Economic Development/Downtown Development ICM/DCM/ACM: Geor e Cam bell Cit Mana er g p ~ y g ~T 1R.TF,CT Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a grant application from Elk River Investments from the Downtown Incentive Grant Program not to exceed $10,000; and providing for an effective date. (The Downtown Development Task Force recommends approval 6-0. The Economic Development Partnership Board recommends approval 7-0) BACKGROUND Applicant: Ralph Ramsey, Vice President of Elk River Investments Denton, Texas City Council approved the Downtown Incentive Reimbursement Grant Program on April 3, 2007, and allocated $50,000 to fund the program for 2007-2008 fiscal year. Key elements of the policy are: ~ Grant funds area 50:50 match and are reimbursed upon receiving proof of expenditure and completion of work. ~ Certain redevelopment activities are eligible for grant funds. o Facade Rehabilitation o New Awnings and Signs o Impact Fee Reimbursement o Utility Upgrades • An applicant is defined as an eligible property within the Downtown Central Business District. A single owner of multiple properties may apply for grant funds for each property but may not receive more than $50,000 per property. • Projects are considered based on: o Compliance with current building standards o Perceived need for proposed renovations and historical accuracy o Design quality o Compatibility of design in relation to other buildings o Project compatibility with streetscape objectives o Project compatibility in relation to Downtown Development goals o Proximity to Courthouse-on-the-Square • A process for proj ect review, recommendation and approval are defined. o City staff review o Downtown Task Force review and recommendation o Economic Development Partnership Board review and recommendation o City Council review and approval PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW The Downtown Task Force reviewed the grant request from Elk River Investments on October 10, 2007 and requested additional information. The Task Force reviewed the additional material on November 14, 2007 and recommended an incentive in the amount of $10,000 to be used for general building and property repairs (roof, exterior & interior and parking lot) and to add handrails to the sidewalk facing McKinney Street. The Economic Development Partnership Board reviewed the grant request at their November 19, 2007 meeting and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION The Downtown Development Task Force recommends approval 6-0. The Economic Development Partnership Board recommends approval 7-0. FISCAL IMPACT If approved, this grant will be awarded in the amount of $10,000; Elk River is investing $122,291 in the project. The FY 07-08 budget has funds in the amount of $50,000. If approved, this would be the first grant awarded through the Downtown Incentive Reimbursement Grant Program. F,XHTRTT~ 1. Ordinance 2. Grant agreement 3. Grant application 4. Excerpt of minutes from Downtown Task Force 10-10-07 meeting 5. Excerpt of minutes from Economic Development Partnership Board 11-19-07 meeting Pre ared b Julie Glover Economic Development Program Administrator Respectfully submitted: r 4 yy~~ t ~i*k I . i~ p' ,• -. n :lR5:1 - A{i Yn L: Linda Ratliff Director of Economic Development 2 ~;lo~.r dacumentslardinances1~81e~~C river gr~nt.~oc ~~~~~ ~~~ AN ORDINANCE OF TIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D~NTON, TEA, API'R.O~INO A GRANT A~FLICATION FROM ELF RISER INVESTMENTS FROM TFIE DONTOVL~N INCENTIVE REI~L~RSEENT GRANT PROGRAM NOT TO EMCEED ~ 4,04; AND PRO~TIDIN FOR AN EFFECTI~IE DATE, WHEREAS, on April ~, X047, the City Council approved ~ Downtown Incentive Rein~hursen~ent ~'rogram by Ordinance No. X407-072; and AREAS, Eli River Investments has applied far a 14,404 grant; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY CO~C]NCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON I~EREBY ORDAINS: SECTION l . The City Council of the City of Denton. hereby approves the request ~on~ Ells River Investments for $14,000 from the Dov~nto~ ~neentive Reixnbursen~ent Crrant Program. SECTION ~. The ~Vlayor, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute the Agreerrient and to carry out the duties ar~d responsibilities of the City, including the expenditure of funds as provided in the Agreement. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall become effective ~n~n~ediately uponrts passage and approval. PASSED AND AFPRO~ED this the __ ~_ day of ~ ., ._, 200. PERRY R. McNEILL, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER SALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY; APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; ED~UIl~ . SNYDER, CITY ,ATTORNEY ~. . ,~- • ~ -~^ r s;la~r documentslcantractsl~Slelk aver agreemer~t,doc D~w~Tw~ R~IIV~B~R~II~'T CANT I~~T'IVE A~REEIV~NT This Downtown Reinvestment grant Incentive Agreement the "A.greement"~ is entered into by and between the pity of Denton, Texas the "pity"}, duly acting herein by and through its ~Vlayor, and Eli River Investments Inc. a Subchapter corporation the "owner"}, duly autha- ri~ed to do business and in good standing in the State of Texas, duly acting herein by and through its authorized officer. WHEREAS, the pity has adapted a resolution which provides that it elects to be eligrble to participate in downtown reinvestrrlent grant incentives and has adopted guidelines and criteria governing downtown reinvestment grant incentive agreements known as the Denton Downtown Reinvestment Grant Incentive Prom.; and wI~EREA, on the 3r~ day of April, X007, the pity council of Denton, Texas the "fit ~ y ouncil'~} adopted the Denton the `{Program"}, ~. copy of which is on file in the pity of Denton Economic Development ~ff~ce and which is Incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Policy constitutes appropriate "guidelines and criteria" governing down- town reinvestment grant incentive agreements to be entered into by the pity; and WHEREAS, owner will be the owner, as of the Effective Date has hereinafter defined}, which ownership is a condition precedent, of certain real property, >~nore particularly described in Exhibit "~" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agree- >nent for all purposes the "Premises~'~ a of the Effective Date; and WHEREAS, on the 1 ~t day of October, Zo07, owner submitted an applicatian for rein- ~restment with various attaeh~nents to the pity concerning the contemplated use of the Premises the "Application"~, which is attached hereto and Incorporated herein by reference as Exlubit ~~~}~. and a wHEREA, the pity council finds that the contemplated use of the Prernises, the on~ ternplated Improvements has hereinafter defined} to the Pren~ses as set forth in this Agreement, and the other terms hereof axe consistel~t with encouraging development in accordance with the purposes and are in compliance with the ordinance and Prograrn and similar guidelines and cri- teria adopted by the pity and all applicable law; N~, THEREFORE, the pity and owner for and in consideration of the premises and the pron~ses contained herein do hereby contract, covenant, and agree as follows: I. TERIVIS ADD ~NDf TI~I~ ~F REIMBURE~VIE~T A. In consideration of and subject to the Dwner meeting alI the terms and conditions of reimbursement set forth herein, the pity hereby grants the following reimbursement: s;l~ur ~ocumentslcon#rakcts1~81e~~ aver agreer~ent.~oc l , ~ rein~burse~ment in an amount not to exceed ~ 10,0~~ att~.butable to new capital investment, as hereinafter described, being cor~strncted an tine Pre..ise~. B. A cand~tion of the Reimburerrient is that, by January 9, ~~~ ~ub~ect to force majeure delays not to exceed 18~ days}, capital investment in the farm of awnings, facade and railings as described in Exhibit "B" be constructed ors the Premises, For the purposes of this - ragraph, the term "force rriajeure" shall mean any circumstance or any condition beyond the con- trol of owner, as set forth in Section Xl "Force Majeure" which rriaes it impossible to meet the above-mentioned thresholds. The term "capital investment" ~~ defined as the cantructian, renovation and equipping of awnings, railings and facade as described in Exhibit "~" the "Improvements on the Premises", the "~anten~plated hnprovem.ents" or "lmproven~ent~"~ to include cots related to the canstr~ction of the Ipraveniei~ts an the Premises, D. ~ condltran of the Reirriburse.ent ~~ that the contemplated Improvements be constructed and the Premises be used substantially in accordance with the description of the project set forth in Exhibit "" E, Owner agrees to comply with all the terns and condltlo~as set forth in this Agree- rnent. II, ~NDITI~N ~F REIB[~RSEMENT A. At the time of the award of the Reimbursement, owner shall be current on all ad valorem real property taxes with respect to any properties owned within the pity. B. Prior to the award of the Reimbursement, Owner shall have constructed the api- tai Improverrrents as specified in Exhibit "B" IIf, RE~RD AND E~ALUATf~N ~F PROJECT A. The owner shall provide access and authorize inspection of the Premises by pity employees and allow uffrcient inspection. of financial information related to construction of the Improvements to insure that the hnprnvernents are made and the thresholds are met according to the specifications and conditions of this Agreerrient~ Such inspections shall be done in a way that will not interfere with owner' ~ business operations. Page 2 s:lo~r docume~tslcon~ra.~tsl~8le~k giver a~re~tnen#.doc ~. GENERAL PR~vII~N A. The City has detern~rned that ~t has adapted gulel~nes and crrter~a Downtown Rei~.bursen~ent grant Incentive Program agreements for the fit to a11ow it to enter into this ., ~ Agreement canta~rnn the terms set forth herein. B, The pity has determined that procedures (allowed by the fit canf orm to the re- quirements of the bode and the Policy, and have been anal wi11 be undertaken in coardinatron with owner's corporate, public employee, and business relations re uiren~en#s. neither the Premises nor any of the ~mpraven~ents covered b this A een~ent are Y awned ar leased by any n~enrzber of the pity aunc~l, any member of the i7l•L~juF Plannin}/~~~/y and ion, i , 4 ~ * V Ong on~n~lssian of the City, or any member afthe governing body of an taxin units 'oinln in Y g J ~ Qr adapting this Agreement, D. In the event of any con~.ict between the City coning ordinances, ar other i ar- f F . dinances or regulations, and this Agreement, such ordinances or re lotions sha11 control, v, N~TIE A11 notices called far or rewired by this Agreement sha11 be addressed to the fallawin g~ or such o#her party ar address as either party designated ~ writing, by certified mail asta a re- P g ~ pare, by hand delivery or via facsimile: ~wNER: CITY: Ralph Ramsey, dice President Barge , ~atnpbell, i 1Vlana er . Elk River investments City of Denton X31 I ~. I~, to 14D 2I5 East IVIcl~inney Denton T~ 7~~07 Denton, Teas 7~2~~ I ~'ax Na. 4D.34~.~6 vI. ~IT~ ~~UNCI~ AUTH~IATI~N Thin Agreement was authorized by the City Council by passage of an enablin ordinance g at its meeting on the $th day of January, ~4~~, authorizing the a or to execute this A cement y on behalf of the City, a copy of which is attached hereto and Inca orated herein b reference as .. ~ y Exhibit "~". Page ~ s:lour ~.ocumentslcontracts1~81e1~e river agreerrxent.doc ~~~. SLV~RABIILTY In the event an~r section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, phase or ward is held invalid illegal or uncvnstitut~onal, the balance of this Agreement shall stand shad be enforceable and shall be read as if the parties intended at ail Mmes to delete said 1n~alid section, subsection ara- , ~~ graph, sentence, phrase, or word, In the-event that {~} the term of the Re~nabursenaent with re~ spect to any praprt is longer than allowed b~ law, ar {ii} the Reinabursen~ent applres to a broader classrficatian of property than is allowed by law, then the Reinabursen~ent shall be valid with respect to the classification of property abated hereunder and the artion of the term ' s p , that ~s allowed by law, VIII, ~wNER STA~I~tN~ owner, as a party to this Agreement, shall be deemed a proper and necessary party in lltt ~ . . ~ gat~on questlo.ng or challenging the valydaty of tills Agreement or any of the underlying or- dinances, resolutions, or pity ouncii actions authorizing same and owner shall be entitled to lrlt~t'VC~e 1n sold l~tlgatlon. I. APPLICABLE LA.w This Agreement shall be construed wader the laws of the State of Texas and i full er~ farm Y ~ able rn ~entan Jaunty, Texas. venue for any action under this Agreement sh,il be in Den- ton. bounty, ~. ENTIRE AC~REEENT This instrument with the attached exhibits contains the entire agreement between the ar- ti ~ p es with respect to the transaction cantenaplated in this Agreement. L B~NDI~ This Agreement shall be binding on the parties and the respective successors, assi s, heirs, and legal representatives. III. ~IJNT~RPART This .Agreement .ay be executed in counterparts, each of which sba11 be deemed an ari . g mal, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same ~nstrunaent. Page 4 s;l~ur doc~mentslcan~rac#s1~Sle~k river agreemen#.do~ VIII. ETI~N ANA OTPI~R H~AD~NC~ Section ar other head~ns conta~r~ed ~. Agreement are for referencc ores on1 and sha11 not affect in any ~~ the meaning or interpretation of this ~ eement. DIV. N~ JOINT VENT`UR~ Nothing contained m this Agreement is intended ~~ the part.Ies to create a artnerhi or . ~ ~ ~ ~ alnt venture beteer~ the parties, and any rmpl~cat~o to the contrary is hereby disavowed, ~. AI~ND~VIENT This Agreement may he modified ~y the parties hereto to include ether rovisiol~s v~hich .~ ~ could have originally been included ~n this Agreement ar to delete provisions that were not on - inally necessary to this Agreement. t s-~ l ~. ~~~~ ~1 lY ~~J ~f, because of flood, Fire, explosions, civil disturbances, strifes, war, acts of hod, or other causes beyond the control of either Party, either Party is not able to perform an or all of its obli- y gations under this Agreement, then the respective Party's obligations hereunder shall be sus- pended during such period but for no longer than such period of #i~ne when the is unable to p~ perform. This Agreement is executed to be effective a days after the executed date of the day of , 2~~5, the "Effective Date"} by duly authorized officials of the ~i and ~v~ner. PASSED ANA APPROVED s the _ .._ day of ~~~g, CITY ~F DENTIN PERRY R.. cNEILL, iVIA~~~ .ATTEST: JENNIFER SALTERS, CITY SECRETARY ~~4 Page ~ s:lour doc~mentslcontractsl0~l~1~ riper agreemen#.doc APPRO~EI~ A T~ L~AL FARM; EDWIN ~VI. NYDER, ~~T~ ATTORNEY 4 B~: ELK RISER INETMENT RALPH RAIVIEY~, VIE PRESIDENT ATTEST; BY': Page ~ s;lonr documentsl~ontra~ts1~81eIiC river ~reemer~t.doc STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § before .e, the undersigned anthar~ty, a Notary Pnhlic ~n and for said State of Tex a, an this day personally appeared Perry R. cl~e~11, Ilia or far the fit of Denton kno ~ ~ wn to e to be the person ~vho srgned and executed the foregoing instrument, and ckna~led ed to g e that this strument vas executed for the purposes and consrderat~an therein expressed, ripen under my hand and seal ofaf~ce this the da ofJanu 2~OS, ~ ~~ ataxy Public in and for the State of Texas y or,~ission Expires: Page ~ s:laur dac~mentslcantracts1~81e1ic river a~reemer~t.dac STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON § Before rne, the undersigned authority, a Notary Pbl~c ~r~ and for said State of Texas on this day persena~~y appeared fan of#i~er o 11~ Riper Investments a Texas l~non to nee to be the persen mho signed and executed the foregoing instru- ment, and acl~no~vleded to e that this ~nstrun~ent was executed for the purposes and consldera- tton therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this the ~ day of ~a~.uary, 2.08. Notary Puh~~c in and for the State of y Commission expires; _ Page ~ DOWNTOWN INCENTIVE REIMBURSEMENT GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION Please return completed with necessary attachments end signature to Downtown Development orcce, 215 E. McKinney no later than 5 p.m. on the Moodsy prior to the 1~ Wednesday of each month. If you have any application questions, please contact the Downtown Project Coordinator st 940-349-7731. If you have any building ur sign permilPoisturir prrsrn•atioD questions, please contact the Historic Preservation Officer at 940-349-7732. • Applicant Name ~ I'~. • Business 1 • Mailing Address _53 { I ty~l1-l t ~t~s~ SS t~~ I' tU ~.~Ts~l_ i1G ((oZ07 t • ContactPhone_Z~ti O~-~~SSZ- Email;~+lilress___CF~p~T_W-6~~+~~r o'~k ri_r_~~• o`^~ • Building Owner (jdiJferent from app/icamj o- a-_ • HistoricaVCturent Building Name, ~~ __~r kt R{~C4i_ ~'~-, • Physical Building Address S rmt~ 4 • Tvoe of Work: (check all that apply) ~f X_ Fayade Rehabilitation _ Fayade - Paintonly 7~ Awnings _Signage _ Impact Fee _ Utility Upgrade • Detaitc of Planned Impmvementc for [Mwntown Incentive Reimbursement Grant: I'ropnsals :uu1 "total Amounts (please attach or/ginal proposals): 2. • TOTAL COST OF PROPOSED PROJECT: ~ ZO1 'O~ry f~ • AmuGn-r ur Gwl\'r HEttUl:Sr cu (50:6 uY'TU7aL CUSl eauvEj:_~SV:~ - r- • Comolete bud¢et detail form attached on ogee 13 .4ftnch x•ith nl( requiter! cn(nr samples ojpaint, awrrirrg/canopy, sign design, eta, as well as phpld,~rr~,hs ojhrri/d{ng's ertrrinrjacade, roojand foundation. :r• Signature '+ Dale BUDGET DETAIL PROJECT EXPENDII'IIRES CITY FUNDS REQUESTED APPLICANT'S FUNDS TAL TO FACADE REHAB ~..~ TT y "~,J S,'83S ~ ~ ~~ q3~ AWNINGS/SIGNS ~ ~ GJ ~~~ IMPACT FEES UTILITY UPGRADES TOTALS }} {P ~ ~ } ~~ Attach a=aM cobr samples, model Dumbers (for windows, doors, awnings, etc.), photos and/or sketches of work to be completed. Please include as much detail as possible. HOW WILL THIS PROJECT BENEFIT DOWNTOWN DENTON? DObYNTObVN INCENTIVE REII4IBURSEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT FORM IMeaae rebn eomplebd wNi setrarary atbeiseab sad allRnltae b Dowdowa Develoyaeat o16ee, 213 ~ McKlaary tw titer ties 3 pn a tk Moaday prig b tie 1• Wedanday of qei eeatY. If yoo dw aq appliatlo~ gaedfou, pleas eeobet t-e llosratorra yr'ojeet Coadiaabr st 9MJI7-7131. If you qve say batldleg or ai~a peraatt/i6lorie preaervaHaa gaeatiasa, ~ toataet tie Nbterle rraaarvatlw Olsnr at 9~tY3~9-T7JZ 1 have met with the Downtown Project Coordinator, and 1 fully underntard the Dowmown Incernive Reimbursemem Grant Proadtaes and Derails established by the Detnon City Council. 1 imend to use this gent progam fa the aforementioned renovation ptrojects to forward the efforts of revitalization and historic preservation of Daaon's historic downtown. 1 have not received, nor will 1 receive insttrarrce monies fa this mitalization project I have read the Dowmown Irtcemive Reimbursanem Gram Application Procedures including the Downtown Incentive Reimbursemem Gram Details. 1 understand that if 1 am awarded a Dowmown laentive Reimbursement Gram by the Demon City Council, any deviation from the approved project may result in the partial a total withdrawal of the Downtown Incemive Reimbursemem Gram. If 1 am awarded a reimbursemem gam fa fad awning a sign work aad the fetiade, sign. a awning is ehered fa any reason within oie (1) year from cortstruction, I may be required to reimburse the Ci[y of Denton immediately fa the full atnoum of the Downtown emive Reimbursement Grant. EI k ~ ~ I~~ I ~,~~-~-t:..~ ~,~ 1 ~,L BGr7cer./OrranizNiart Namt ~~ ~\ r1p cont's.ti1 afore ~ p ` PrlMed Nome ~ " ~ ~ 2 Dare i I~~ d ~~;~ e ~~ 2t~,.~l,~~ti~ ~r ~~~l -~.:~, ei ~rv~r.. to---~~ Baddr a lhvner i Sga re (tfdr~EreNfram upplrcvtt/ PNwted Natae Date EDPB signnture nt ~C }~~ .~ EIJJ'B mc'erin~ Iteratnmertdatinn /I.i~-v7 Dart Ilofll Sv.rw... r.vAm~ee rs~o...s.-Mfa~..e. .; r ,:t?f ' }' ~ ~ xi-, ~ ; i ~ ~ ~ Sx -~ : 'r z ~~ 1..~ F t'. f~ ~,~-,'?i. s .. ate.' - '~, s; ~. '~~. ~~- -i•' ~_.~ ` ry' ._ t' ~g~ . ;; -~ F ~, .Y , .j ..~ w _'. ~ r _ '- r i 1 . a: r ~ ? f Y~ , r ~ c a ~'_ - - ~ `mot ~' ~ .. ~ ~.~~} ;~` / 4 i ;:~` _J~ _ :='y +:a ~ ~., ~. ~~ 'k ) ,.7. -~. t... ~ ~. ~. ( ~ ~s t ~ s., ~. ~ ~~- ~ i_c < . ;,~ ~' v . - ~ ~ -4 > ~ `3 ~ 4,s t ~c 9 v d~ .ny 1 ~~y,r~,~ 1 x"~l~`z 'zZt p ro'v'R ~EyhJw.x ~c~'``~4' y~ ~' ~~~ ? ^ ~ _ ~. - ~ - ~ Mr4A.w C t i 5 p f r ' ;~ { } ~, .r - ro - ~ ~» ~~s ate ~~+'.'f"* - __ ": h .y. t~ t t _ t y } ~r 2 ~ _C E"` ~~~~ ~: ~ ~ ~ t ~ '++. R ~. "! ,r c~ ~ j ,.`r 5 ! fir' F i ! Y' a5 h~ `Al ~l `~.~Y;,~S~~..f~1' r ~ i ~ it ~, ~,,.3. i j - ~ i.~ ~~ ~ ~1 ~yr~ r k , :3 _ ~ ~` Ss~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~~gg 5~ z t f i `i . . 1 ;_,r1 i~' ~.. t In the image above, we are showing a continuous low metal fence along McKinney, horizontal canopies above the entries and display windows, revealed restored transom windows above the canopies, signage proportion and placement, paint suggestions, and a possible treatment for the south side of the building that uses the same flat canopy that is shown on the front. Notice how the masonry surfaces have been left unpainted and the the pazapet cap has been left intact. 3. Notice the consistent canopy design on the south side of the building. The paint color for the doors and window can match each other with an additional (dazker) color for trim details and window sills. The concrete base (shown dark gray) presents a concern for handicapped accessibility and needs to be addressed with local code officials. The canopy can be designed/detailed any numnber of ways. If the building owner is interested in pursuing a horizontal canopy approach, please contact our office and we can provide further suggestions. We suggest, tha6tl{e ~2aim<<dhfrs liir the windbt+* frames and U`im heihc same-For 6~~th stores in.this-suction oPiheblock: Uillcr~•niiation can occurdhroughsignagean~lwin~lou•. ~n~l ys. "Fhc Krick should. ~nct ~~ain, rcmnin unraimcd. ;, *$3'3 aL'g~ a'~}~EIS 5~:.~a }~,i{Jj '~5'.i111~4 ~ t' .. ~ :. 111, is tai 1 a, iii'Jt :~ J i .'J~ ;{. 1 ijaf 6 ~Q 'S . t > as aw ,1 1. t },}jt~~.j~'L~r~ a.. a r_• ~tj !o It tJ~ ! Ji aJ1,. 1 } 1 t tY:.2~E`a~^s~~} r S: t~ . ~'S'~.. 1.5 rY t. I J = it t•.~YLxIP 1 ( ''s°:dtt~ a'X F:~'~, ' l 1~~~ ~ .l~~Jt~~J}~~ -~ : ~'cri F t Itp w~a 4C+`~iP~z'~.r~~.. ~ w ~ .~ t ~,ft.i."S t ~`t d a•l tE GtJ J ~~~i~{[} ! ~ o~~~'^` ~ ~'z~ J -.f it -z F! ~i } f 2 ~ tt2 ~;A¢¢y,{aa'4~i 1~1 ~.i~' ~ =L~"+ _ f'~ ~i''J~~EJt~~'iJia}~~3! J~ !._=e~5 c * ~ e~;~ ~lJ~t'~'lZJt~aJ~` z `~tt 'f.t t -t~y`~{ '-i,~'*+ Wt); :'-1a1' }; +t;l.Jtt ~J 3 J ;S "`aJ rs. _ *; ~t.~~x _ -9~Zxip...~~??Ltt. JiJ~is ~yltFi..i 3 3ti1 a:a.{.,J J~t I ,rer _~E.-J.' ~. ~L }?t`G?ttlfll t 9'J'~s*ka ~" ~ ` rII~ :. 3. 1 1 IJtl~JlitJtlJ ~`.1 1! I ~ ii i atl! S r i~ J J~~ , ~r~' i { ,f'"~ tai ill 4}tjl,~,a ( *r"'aZ' 11~ x~z_ ~ } 4 1~.,1 5 '{.C7e±.i `"j"J-.~ Gi.~ ~t„aJfE#~ilS'ia ~l~jl~l~s SJ~T~„wl~ ~ ?iy r~-~~~. •, *'~ t'3) I+~ t t}) kep?s} SjJtl~ ts.zllltS+ !! 1 ~{~ 4 .~ 1_^ ~S {. ~ k~. ~t'=i c~J%s}ii}}{a'QI~. ilt ',~ {~ t '~ n ~S 1 ~' ,is C~ t5"d lSttattil7i! ihti~ ! .'i -ea. s* nt }`y c. ~'. JJ ! i {~~ ttl~2t~Jt}}; t,..,a~ E~c. I. ' #~~~ j~ ` ~2J1!rJ`;i trtl'FJJ! J - >° ~~~^: ~ a :a ._ a J ~i '~.t1` xs '>' it it . }~ to .m ,J • ~x ~ [ w :~ Ji•Etthla_e{.,_J~:st:>~•~~Tif+.s}t.S+ti ?1.~.. .. ~Lt;'~,>:,..>... _ ~q+x.:; ~ ,~r:~ r, ~IM ~A'I"~' 1~i~+:f~c~1 QCtober 12, zoo? Ralph Ramsey Elk Riverlnvestments 3311 N IH-35, Suite 140 Denton, TX 76207 Re: 118 E. McKinney Cost Breakdown Dear Ralph: Below is the breakdown you requested for the captioned project. Roofing and roof-related suet metal Parking lot repair and re-stripe Ornamental guard rail along MGCinney Street Refurbish storefronts (inGudes new storefront and new wood trim on West and East sides of building, along with refurbishment along McKinney St) Awnings (Fabric and standing-seam) Soffit & fascia repairs Miscellaneous' • InGudes: • Removal of vegetation on South side • Patch stucce on South side • Paint South side • Caulk expansion jdnls in vertical faces • TuGt-point brick al perimeter $ 43,126.00 5,362.00 3,025.00 30,508.00 16,522.00 15,704.00 8.800.00 TOTAL BASE BID' ~ ~ - $120,844.00 Aflemate 1: Paint Brick on East space perimeter $ 8,4348.00 ARemate 2: Roofing insulation (2.5' poyisocyanurete R-18) $ 6,808.00 I have attempted to provide enough information for presentation, without getting too detailed. Please call if you have questions. Please note that the "total base bid" includes the total of our bid, plus fhe railing bid you requested be presented as part of our proposal. If you have a specfic format requirement for presentation to the City of Denton, please pass that along, and we will fortmat k into compliance. Regards, " I ~ David M. Morton DMlm P.O. RUX (i;i-.- 13J n J'1't7N, 77iYA5 7{~2D2 (940)3S7-?275 PAX {940;1 aR7.-~4fi l %~ r, TIM ~ EATL' 8a,'~i~ 0 September 2l, 2007 Mr. Ralph Ramsey EIk River Investments 3311 N. I-35, Suite 140 Denton, TX 76207 Re: Etk River- 118 E. McKinney St. Exterior Renovations Dear Mr. Ramsey: We are pleased to provide this proposal for the exterior renovations at 118 E. McKinney Street located in Denton, Texas. The scope of work is described below. BUILDING SYSTEMS Roofing: Remove the existing roofing system to the wood deck, install a nail base, ablack-diamond base, two (2) plies of Type-IV felt, fdlowed by a modified bitumen cap-sheet. Replace through- wall scupper fleshings, encapsulate parapet walls wkh modified bitumen membrane, and replace coping and coping flashing at parapet walls. This price indudes an allowance for roofing-related carpentry (parapet and roof-deck repairs.) (ALLOWANCE: 53,000.00) Roofing Warranty: Labor and/or materials for 10.years. Parking lot repairs: Repair an area (18' x 24~ on the east side of the parking lot directly north of the dumpster. Saw cut, demolish and remove detxis from site; prepare compacted base, install reinfordng bar (M3 (~ 18' o.c.e.w.), pour and finish (broom flnish) concrete (Ssack, 3,000 psi mix) Re-stripe parking lot: Install new striping using durable paint to indude 19 regular diagonal spaces, one handicap space with passenger loading zone (hatched space) and one (t) parallel space. Install nine (9) concrete wheel stops at north edge to protect building Remove vegetation from South wall and remove from site ,Patch stucco on South wall: Remove one area at base of wall (1' x 12) and replace Paint South wall Caulk expansion joint on east wall near south end Paint bride on East end and East third of front elevation (See attemate, below) Replace gutter and fasda on South (East end) Tuck-point brick at perimeter (only where mortar is missing) (ALLOWANCE: 52,500.00) EAST SIDE Remove siding and door at entry Fabricate and install new brick and wood fagade matching front, to indude one (t) 3°4° window and one (1) 3°7° door with half glass insert . Paint new wood in fagade (d Attemate I is not selected, matching brick as dosely as possible.) -Remove wood casing around hollow metal door and replace with brick -Paint HM door and frame (rear of Engifsh Paints) ~~'Paint steel window -Install new black fabric awning (using frames salvaged from front center P.O. BOX 68 DENTON, 7'EiXAS 76202 (940).187-3275 PAX (940) 3R2-5461 J', . ~I C DENTON MUSIC STORE Replace 1/4round at glaring Repair wood fascia at base of glazing /Paint all exterior wood Replace threshold ,Replace fabric awning using existing frames (one continuous awning) /Welding on awning frames /Repair soffit/mansard faint soffit & mansard CENTER SPACE fEmoty) iRemove existing awning frames /Remove plywood from transoms Repair transom frames and paint iReplace transom glazing wHh General Aluminum windows, same dimension end install wood trim* iRemove planters and repair wood at base of wall ~~fFepair door and wood frame i Replace threshold /Re-build astragal /~PeiM all wood surfaces abricate and install new flat canopy w/ tumbudcles and standing seam steel roof sheets ~epair sofflUmansard iGPaint soffit 8 mansard HOLES GENERAL STORE !Remove plaMeis and repair wood at base of wall . Repair door below glazing Replace threshold ~Re-build astragal iPaint all wood surfaces ~lnstall new awnings over existing frames install new awning over West window using existing frame ~Repeir soffiUmansard ~PaiM soffit 8 mansard WEST (AUSTIN STREETI ENGLISH'PAINT ~~Remove windows ~- Install storefront systems' - Install wood trim around sto2froM* Repair downspout y ~ Install new awning usiryg salvaged frame from front, center space ~vPaint all wood surfaces Repair soffit/mansard J~aiM soffd & mansard BASE PRICE: S 117,819.00 This price does not include any iMerforwork. ys•R pj~J~J~~ G~'C 1' ,i~.~ j'~'e•~ ~;~ i,.;l:r~l 0....,.i~1 Sa-~ JI~GG 'fri1oc ~ C [p~ ~~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~i~' u'I~ibe+ '^ G'l Ri/~e; - 7 i:_ E LI,Hn';ne: sheet E+fencr Eeno•,ah:+ns. Pieppsai I/i ~ Gi ALTERNATE 1: Paint yellow brick on east and east end of North sides Paint brick, color as selected by owner ADD TO BASE PRICE: S 6,948.00 ALTERNATE II: Install 2.5" of polvisocyanurate insulation on roof IR-19+) It interior lay-in ceilings are removed with insulating balls. there may be no insulation, unless it exists between the roof deck and the tin ceiling panels. ADD TO BASE PRICE: S 6,808.00 This price does not include sales tax. Any akeration from the above specifications, which involves extra cost, will be executed only upon a written order and will become an extra charge to the original bid price. All agreements, oral and written, are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Tim Beaty Builders ranies a $5,000,000 General Liability policy and Worker's Compensation Insurance. It is a pleasure doing business with you. If you have any questions about this bid, please give me a call.. Sincerely, 1.~•~-+ r David. M. Morton DMfjm -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By signature below, I hereby acknowledge and accept Base bid, as described above for a total additional amount of S 117,819.00 Date ,Signature -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By signature below, I hereby acknowledge and accept the Akemate I, as described above for a total deductive amount of S 6,948.00. Date Signature -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By signature below, I hereby acknowledge and accept the Alternate II, as described above for a total deductive amount of S 8,808.00. Date Signature E ~ Fr: Sr- t i8 E P•.C Farm. S.-s p.san:: F~na: aticrrs - Fr~~.rosal Downtown Task Force 8:30 A.M. -October 10, 2007 City Council Work Session Room 215 E. McKinney EXCERPT OF MINUTES 1. Reviewed a Downtown Incentive Reimbursement Grant Program Application for 118 East McKinney Street and made a recommendation to the Economic Development Partnership Board Glover reviewed the grant application and gave a brief history on the project and the selection process for the grant program. Rivers lead the discussion on the application. Moses make the motion to recommend to the Economic Development Partnership Board that the application for 118 East McKinney be awarded a Downtown Incentive Reimbursement Grant of $10,000 for awnings and the facade which includes the railing. The motion was seconded by Milncs and carried unanimously (9-0). EXCERPT OF MINUTES CITY OF DENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP BOARD November 19, 2007 After determiningthat aquorum was present, the Economic Development Partnership Board convened on Monday, October 15, 2007 at 11:45 a.m. in the Chamber of Commerce board room, 414 Parkway, Denton, Texas. PRESENT: Perry McNeill, Marty Rivers, Euline Brock, Denny Aldridge, Stan Morton, Jerry Mohelnitzky and Gretchen Bataille STAFF PRESENT: Jon Fortune, Linda Ratliff, Michelle Cunningham, Christina Davis, Brian Langley, John Knight, Chuck Carpenter, Karen Dickson, and Patti Temple, Julie Glover ABSENT: George Campbell GUESTS: Dr. Vish Prasad, Jason Marshall, Ian Fredrickson, Ed Feldman, and Matt Lutteman. 3. Received a report, held a discussion and made a recommendation regarding a request for a Downtown Redevelopment Grant incentive for the Elk River 118 E. McKinney property. Ratliff gave a brief history on the downtown redevelopment grant. Rivers reported that this is a $120,000 project. The Downtown Task Force focused on projects that make a difference in the downtown. They feel this project reflected that goal and that a $10,000 grant would be appropriate. Open discussion regarding the details of the project resulted in a recommendation. Brock motioned that the Economic Development Partnership Board recommend this project to the City Council fora $10,000 Downtown Redevelopment Grant. The motion was seconded by Aldridge and carried unanimously (7-0). AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development ACM: Fred Greene SUBJECT - Z07-0024 (Wild Mustang Crossing, LTD) Hold a public hearing and consider the adoption of an ordinance regarding the initial zoning of an approximately 0.12-acre tract of land from a Rural Residential 5 (RD-5) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district and the rezoning of approximately 1.39 acres of land from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district. The site is located on the north side of Teasley Lane, northwest of Old Alton Road and directly south of John H. Guyer High School. BACKGROUND Applicant: Wild Mustang Crossing, Ltd. Dallas, TX The subject property consists of three (3) parcels, two of which are zoned Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) and include approximately 1.39 acres of land. The third parcel is currently zoned Rural Residential 5 (RD-5) and includes approximately 0.12 acres of land. Refer to Exhibit 5 (Future Land Use Map) to see the three parcels. Existing and proposed zoning maps are provided in Exhibits 3 and 4. The rezoning request was submitted in conjunction with the voluntary annexation (A07-0004) of the northeast portion of the property (0.12-acre tract). The first reading of the ordinance was heard by City Council on November 6, 2007. The second reading of the ordinance was heard by City Council on December 11, 2007. The applicant is proposing retail uses. Once property is developed, applicant will plat the three parcels into one contiguous ot. The Planning and Development Department sent notices of the public hearing to property owners within 200 feet and courtesy notices to residents within 500 feet of the subject property. As of this writing, staff has not received any responses from property owners within 200 feet of the subj ect property. (1PTT(1N~ 1. Approve as submitted. 2. Approve with conditions. 3. Deny. 4. Postpone consideration. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this rezoning request (5-0). F,XHTRTT~ 1. Staff Analysis 2. Location Map 3. Existing Zoning Map 4. Proposed Zoning Map 5. Future Land Use Map 6. Notification Information 7. Site Photos 8. Letter from Applicant 9. Minutes of December 12, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting l0.Ordinance Prepared by: Johnna Matthews Planner I Respectfully submitted: ,~"''. ~ ~~.~ Brian Lockley, AICP Interim Director, Planning and Development 2 EXHIBIT 1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT STAFF ANALYSIS CASE NO.: Z07-0024 DATE TO BE CONSIDERED: January 8, 2008 LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Teasley Lane, northwest of Old Alton Road and south of John H. Guyer High School. APPLICANT/OWNER: Wild Mustang Crossing, Ltd 14860 Montfort Dr., Suite 241 Dallas, TX 75254 REQUEST: Consider the initial zoning of approximately 0.12 acres of land from a Rural Residential 5 (RD-5) zoning district to Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district and rezone approximately 1.39 acres of land from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district. The total acreage being rezoned is approximately 1.51 acres. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this zoning change request (5-0). COMPREHENSIVE The subject site is located within an Existing Land Use/Infill PLAN DESIGNATION: Compatibility future land use designation. SITE AND There is currently one vacant single family home on the site, which will be SURROUNDINGS: demolished when the property is developed. North: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) - John H. Guyer High School South: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) -Undeveloped land East: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) and ETJ -Undeveloped land and Evans Pump Company West: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2); Mostly undeveloped land BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the north side of Teasley Lane, INFORMATION: northwest of Old Alton Road and directly south of John H. Guyer High School. The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 0.12 acres of land from a Rural Residential 5 (RD-5) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district. The applicant is also requesting to rezone approximately 1.39 acres of land from a Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2) zoning district to a Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district; a total of approximately 1.51 acres of land is proposed to be rezoned to a NRMU zoning district. This rezoning request was submitted in conjunction with an annexation request (A07-0004) of the approximate 0.12 acres of the subject property, 3 located northeast on the property. The first reading of the ordinance was heard by City Council on November 6, 2007. The second reading was heard by City Council on December 1 1, 2007. ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan The subject site is located within the "Existing Residential/Infill" Analysis: future land use area. A description of "Existing Residential/Infill Compatibility" from the Denton Comprehensive plan reads as follows: "Within established residential areas, new development should respond to existing development with compatible land uses patterns, and design standards. The plan recommends that existing neighborhoods within the City be vigorously protected and preserved. Housing that is compatible with the existing density, neighborhood service, and commercial land uses is allowed. " The proposed NRMU zoning district is consistent with the future land use designation as described in the Denton Plan. The requested zoning district, Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU), is primarily a commercial and institutional zoning district which Development permits uses designed to support surrounding residential areas. Attached Code/Zoning Analysis single family uses are permitted with limitations to density requirements and multifamily residential uses are permitted with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) within the NRMU zoning district. However, single family and duplex residential uses are not permitted. The NR-2 zoning district permits residential uses including single family homes and community homes, but commercial uses are generally not permitted. The differences between the aforementioned zoning districts are summarized in Table 1. If the zoning change is approved, the development of the property will be subject to general regulations of the NRMU zoning district, which include a maximum lot coverage of 80% and a minimum 20% landscaped area. The maximum building height is 65 feet and the minimum yard when abutting a single family use or district, such as NR-3 or NR-4 is 20 feet, plus one foot for each foot of building height above 20 feet. There are no front or rear yard setback requirements; however, the minimum side yard is 6 feet. 4 Table 1. Comparison of permitted uses between RD-5, NR-2 and NRMU zoning districts Single Family Dwellings ,~ P P ~~~ ~~ N Accessory Dwelling Units P SUP/L(1) N Attached Single Family Dwellings N N L(40) Dwellings Above Businesses N N P Live/Work Units P N P Group Homes SUP N SUP Multi-Family Dwellings N N SUP/L(4) Manufactured Housing Developments P SUP N ~ ~ ~ .,~ Hotels N N P Bed and Breakfast L(10) N P Retail Sales and Service N N L(17) Restaurant or Private Club N N L(11) Drive-through Facility N N SUP Professional Services and Offices N N L(17) Quick Vehicle Servicing N N SUP Laundry Facilities N N P Equestrian Facilities P SUP N Outdoor Recreation P P SUP Administrative or Research Facilities SUP N L(14) Broadcasting or Production Studio SUP N L(14) ~ ~ .,~ Bakeries N N L(21) Kennels L(14) L(37) N Veterinary Clinics P N P ~ ~ , .,~ Community Service N N P Semi-public, Halls, Clubs, and Lodges N SUP P Business/Trade School N N L(14) Adult or Child Day Care P SUP P Kindergarten, Elementary School P SUP P Middle School N N P High School N N SUP Medical Centers N N P Elderly Housing N SUP P Table 1 Le : P -Permitted N -Not permitted SUP -Specific Use Permit Limitations: L(1) =Accessory dwelling units are permitted, subject to the following additional criteria: 5 1. The proposal must conform with the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 2~ The maximum number of accessory dwelling units shall not exceed 1 per lot. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50% of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1000 sq. ft. GHFA unless the lot meets the requirements of L(1).5. 4. One additional parking space shall be provided that conforms to the off street parking provisions of this Chapter. 5. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50% of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, where the lot size is equal to or greater than ten acres in size. An SUP is not required for such an accessory residential structure where the lot size is equal to or greater than ten acres. L(4) =Multi-family is permitted only: 1. With a Specific Use Permit; or 2. As part of a Mixed-Use Development; or 3. As part of a Master Plan Development, Existing; or 4. If the development received zoning approval allowing multi-family use within one year prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. _2005-224; or 5. If allowed by a City Council approved neighborhood (small area) plan. L(10) = Limited to 5 guest rooms, plus limitations in L8 L(11) =Limited to sit down only, and no drive up service permitted. Limited to no more than 100 seats and no more than 4,000 square feet of restaurant area. L(14) =Uses are limited to no more than 10,000 square feet of gross floor area. L(17) =Uses are limited to no more than 25,000 square feet of gross floor area per use, except grocery stores may be larger with approval of an SUP. L(21) =Bakery and bottling areas not to exceed 2,500 square feet. Sales on premises of products produced required in this zone. L (37) = 5-acre minimum land area required and no more than 25 kennels per acre allowed, including indoor and outdoor runs. A natural buffer strip is required adjacent to any residential use. L (40) =Limited to a maximum 12 units per acre. DEPARTMENT AND The Development Review Committee has reviewed the application. No issues AGENCY REVIEW pertinent to the requested zoning change were identified. Denton Independent School District was notified and the City has received no objections to this rezoning request. FINDINGS The criteria for approval of Zoning Amendments, per 35.3.4.B.2 of the Denton Development Code requires that: 6 1. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Future Land Use element of the Denton Plan, and The requested zoning change conforms to the Future Land Use Designation of the Denton Plan which notes that new development should respond to existing development with compatible land use patterns. 2. The proposed rezoning facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewers, schools, parks, other public requirements and public convenience. Facilities are generally adequate for transportation, water, sewers and otheN public Nequirements for this development. 7 EXHIBIT 2 LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT 3 EXISTING ZONING MAP EXHIBIT 4 PROPOSED ZONING MAP 10 EXHIBIT 5 FUTURE LAND USE MAP 11 EXHIBIT 6 NOTIFICATION MAP SOD FT TTE ~D~ FT Public Notification Date: l l/28/2007 200' Legal Notices sent via certified mail: 5 500' Certified Notices sent via regular mail: 9 Number of responses to 200' Legal Notice • In opposition: 0 • In Favor: 0 • Neutral: 0 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . ~A copy of the notification list can be picked up at City Hall West, 221 N. Elm Denton TX 76201 :............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. : 12 John H. Guyer High School. EXHIBIT 7 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Northwest corner of subject property looking south along Teasley Lane (FM 2181) 13 Northwest corner of subject property looking northeast at Southwest corner of subject property looking northeast at site. Southwest corner of subject property looking north at site. 14 EXHIBIT 8 LETTER FROM APPLICANT ~. ~~ September ~0, ~4 . Lori Sheltton Pinning Departrnen~t Planning ~d D~+elopme~t City Hail IIIIe ~~9 N. ~Im S~kreet Dentan, Texas 7~2~~ I~Y~ ~.~1+4 ACRD TRACT T~ASL~Y ~AH~ HEAR H~BS~~I I.AN~; I.~TT~R OF tNT~CN; PRIED Z~HH11~G; -1T~N, ~`E~AS Lear Ms, Sl~el6an: This iii serve as our Le~eer ~ 1nt regarding aonirr~ cnge i'Or a ~,5~4 app pct of land iaoated as indic;ebed on tt-e etched ~or~ing exhibit. Moat o~ property within 24a' of Teastey Road oan#aining ap~rox~nately, was anrraaasd by Ciky and the mining es~bliahed by the City to t~R~~ . (iweighborhaod i~etait ~~~. APpro~cim~ely ~.~~ IalCr~s of subject tract laid outside the City 20~` strap mntng and has not bean annexed or ~or~ed within the City. Ort behalf ~ the t~wner w~ sire r~ul requesting ar~rrexatto~n of . 0.12 Acre Tract preceding this coning strange requestt 1Ne are herewith requestsn~ ~e~onin9 ~ the 1.39 Acre Stte and zoning of the ~,1 ~~ a tract's a .. ~ common zoning ~ IVeighborhvcd Retail Mio~d lase ~NRi~U~. In supPork ~ his coning request, w~ are providing irrrormatian regarding access and public u~iit~s as tom: t. Aces: Th$ property fronts Teasley Lane and currently has an exis~ng driveway ca~nac~on'~ are e~sting reaiderrtiel home. there is ample frontal far $afe cot . ~. Public I~Ya Public Vvater ie cumendy loed~v~ithin Tuley bane fi~arr{ing the property. 3. Pubic ~ry Suer. The exng~ r+asiderl bane ~ cntiy or~ private sewe ern. Public aanitary 5ewar is laced in area downstm of.the Property but has not been ex~errded ~ the grape as y~, . 15 16 EXHBIT 9 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES nd~aIt! ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~~~~ 1 ~ (C~SILI~~ F.4~L,E7~F LY~E,I~1NGr ~ 3 'I'H~ P1SiV~T.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~S~I~INFR F3LE'f(~N: GOQd ~v~enu~g aq~ 4 ~ t}~ R~gulmr ~+ia of Planing a~ ~nipg S ~ mmi.s~ion. ~ havwe a quorum pra~enia I gall t~a~ G 7 maeting to ~r o~ ~Ve~dnr,~ay, dear 1f~ ~ ~;3~ p,~n, ~ 8 Est r a~ bum, the Play ~f 8 ~ luv~. V~d y a u~, ply. ~ 1~ ~ ~} #~c P1 ~ A1le~ianr~ 1~ . 11 ri,~d.~ 11 1~. X51 FAI;I.ET: aver ~f 1~ 13 b~ tont i~ to c~si.d~r app~nval ~f tl~ F 1~ 1~ ~n~ nine ~$sic~ meek ~~` avernl~er ~$} ~4 1~ ~~1. 1 1G~ CDI~iMii01~R Lam: far ~~. 1G ~'~ ~ COMMi~~IONF,,~ LET: I ~ ~ 1lfbtl~l fai ~'7 18 ~ppraval. ~ ~ hit` ~ md? ~ ~ 1~ ~~IA; wand. 19 ~~ ~I~ ~~~; ~ T~ m~~.On wg~ ~~ ~1 ~i I~. L~}ae, d mad ~y Jay ~a -- ammi~ia~r ~1 ~~ ~S. Ply v on #~e b ~~ ~~ aka. ~l~p~ar~atly, we're l7svin~ s ~3 ~4 t~tmi. ~iffit at~d we d ~ a Land vut~, ~ ~4 ~5 ~1l ~f ~ in ~~v~', r~i.~e yu~a r hard, fie. ~ 25 . ~ ~ P~ 1 #b+0~~ Opp T~]C V ~ J~-~, 1 ~ ~ 3 ~ .4 ~ 5 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 $ ~ ~ ~ ~ IO 1~ 11 1~ .~ 1~ 1~ ~~ 1~ i4 14 1~ ~ ~ ~S 1~ ~~ ~~ ~ 17 1$ 1~ ~~ 19 ~0 ~1 ~1 ~~ ~3 4 ~¢ 2~ I?E~1~1 ~L~.I~ 1+]1,~ YYII~T RE~JL1~ ~I 1~~~~7 Pad 1 ~ ~a~~ 4 17 dI~± P ~ ~IISl F~TI: Next i.s ~'~ ~ . ~ l~~eada. A have ~ cau~l~ of i ~n tia~ ~t ~ 3 Aga, A~ #~,ff i~ ~~n$ of i ~ 4 ~ mad t~~ ~f t l~oprn~n~ ~ ~ ~. I]~ have au~r - ~ ~ IwiPC. ~RASE~ l~r. - ~ 7 C~hd~IER EA4Lt3T~I~; ~' ? ~ ~~: -- - ~rliar in tie $ ~ ~sn t W~ ~ diecuion ~f mavln~ ism ~ ~ ~ ~~ t1~ Items Fay ~ ~n, ~ I the 1~ i ] staff' ~ ~~ is amen whit to rem ~ 1 1~ a~~r~va~ ~ item ~ a to ~~aomd ~virG~m 31 to 1~ 1~ It~ms~ ~'~ ivi~sl nr,~i~n, ~~ I4 I~4II~~II PAT{~d+T; ~.1~~ t~ 14 1~ that ~ vate"~ 1~ 1 ~ I+~R. DRASE: I ~ 1~ 1 ~ 1? si~tc,~y ~' ~ wanes ~ iuak~ the t 1'~ ~~ ~~MM[9~I, FLEI'~I+I: fir, 1$ ~~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ IVllvli~~i~1~TP.h I ~ ~Y~[J ~~ ~ ~ith~k s~ie~ it ~r ~ it~ ~1 ~~ I+1ER EAGL~I~N: ' rnati~n mad ~y ~~ ~ , lea I hear a d~ ~~ ~5 ~1R ~A~EIF: ~1~~. The moti~ ~~ Pie ~ 1 node ~d ~ ~ Y B fra~m the i~nt Age ~ ~ ~ ~~m I~ ~' I~ Items Far ~on~~ ° ~tdi~ri~~al ~ idersti,~ ~d~aV~ Item A} i~ the ~ott`~ ~ ~ MR DIt.AlCE: T~tT~ 'G~"k. ~ ~ ~dvQr rye your right hand p1e A11 ~ppcd ~i~fy ~ '~ ~ ~ aa. pay -~. ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~a 11 11 ~~ 1~ ~~ ~ 1~ 1~ 1~ 1~ 1~ ~~ i~ i~ i~ ,18 ~~ ~i~ ~~ ~i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ 7 P ~ ~~ - Pad ~ 18 ~~~~~ T~f Pay ~ ~llti'iNll*I~NER EA~I~N: 1fCm ~[}i ~ indivi oan~ ie a~iau fmm ~pter ~ ~~.~.~,I~d.3 ~ to Fist 0~'~ite ~ 4 the It~aa alt ode ri rent f~ ~ a 'F~~ hit A~s~~rsi~ The ~ 1 ~.4- ~ ~ ~ land i~ lid at t}~ ~ ~ 7 ~idcury ~ mad ~~ Thy Imo. T~ iPY i~ $ lid wither ~ ~t ti~l lldix T„~ ~i~ ~ ~~ ~. ~~ . ~~ - ~: may. y~ 11 tiu t ~~1~ i.s ~ at r ~f ~2 Vaal Lane and F~1r ~ Rod. Aid it ~s~ ~r ~~ #a yea gr~viauel3~ tI~ }ter ~ a~~ it s 1~ ~ t~ alv~ ~a mall. 15 The ~ni tiuh ~vag ~ppr- ~ ~~ p~'~ d~utl I~Ii LTA. And 1? ~plica~t i.e P~ ~ du rail delupm~t ~ ~ 1$ ~O~r. 1~ ~~.y bav~ u d u~ arhi~h i~~~>~~~~Teand~Ii~ ~1 ua 1 ° l.b ec ~f` the 1~-ate ~~~ A~td ~ a ~n~iti~ ~f ~lr a Tl~i is r~quirad if rn t ~~ 1~U ttip~ r hrna ~r ~ d pe: day ~4 meted, alts is tb~ ~n 'tined ~~ t~ the t~ r #~a dnin~ a traffic Pad 11 1 hasi.~sll~r, ~uildi~ ~~ as pity a~ti~e~, v~rhi~h iaolu~ a r~.g~~ . ~ A~mn, this is ~ ~ al . ~ h ~ tyrl~ alp ~ eans~ p~avnt tom. 5 ~~ this ~i ~o ~t~ ~ tarn ]nt~ ~~~i ~n~a ~ t~ir eft and at ir~i~.on as w a~ ~ strait duxh ~ ~~ ~i~ka~ r. And tin ~ rift the ~i11 b~ traf~~ west v~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~et~. 1~ ~ ~f theme - ~ ~ .+ ~asi~ unary 1! of'ti~se -- of t v$ri refit ~ Chat ta~`f 1~ n~ing ~pn~al ~ waif 'fit based ~~ ~ t lioant'~'~i.~is #~ ~~t t fwi~ 1~ ~ A~ th,~t'~ t ar~tr~ lift-turn ~~ ~n T~ Luca that ill sad ~tif~r ~~ t1~ si~al~ at iflttion ~f I[r ~ ~ . i7 T~asr Lam ~ a~prr~ovod 1}y T and #bey wild 1~ imp~vent~ ~ Him Road front ~f tb~ ~~ site, a~ v~11 as Si~i~in~ that p~vnt 1aa ~~ ~xisti ma,~ al~,t at ~ of r 1 6~, ~, '~ #' is rmm oval ~~ ~f ~iaaa~ r~qt. And ~ you l~~v~ any ~~a ~~ ~ ~-auld be + to ansr them, if ~ ten, ~ ~xt r~ s. may, has r . >~e I ~ lea 1~ 1 ,set a~1ye1~ they~v~ r~qud ~ to but tit 1 already riv ~ Y nf'thi~ ~ i.s that j~lst ading~ ~ m~ey arrd e~`art tower ivigg Hi~k~ry k ~d ~ rte- v; They have pi,e~ of ~f ~ T~ Lam. ~ the Fennit~. T]y have a ,py -- ~ , ~ defer ~ And to dive u am i~a of but eis 4 P.. Arm on this bnt I Gels ~y ~ i.e~ ~f ~ ~ntly, this ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~al g1~s,1t firm ~ o#' ~ ~ t~vvar~ t~ #~ g wii~ be, ~ ~~ not mt~r t1~ #his ale. Hut the harvwe 7 this i~ ~~ s a1 T~ Imo. 7 also riv ~ivev~ay permits p~ite f~ rum tl~ ~ 'lhi,s sits ply shows d~ layo~k ' the S u~l~ti $c~os~ 'TILT right way, ~ b~li. Is that ~ a~roerYts devet~~ ~- ~ tbin~ that gas m~ -- at ~ ~ '~, 1~ i~ C~~~~ ; Bak v~ Dave nit -_ t ~ The apptie~at ~ pag ~ t 1 ~ e } ~dceived an~+ i b~k ~ the t ~ i~,avetat that would ~ he ~ the L~ lanes and -_ 1 ~ ' $ ~~ ~~~ 1~11~1 lA ~ ~ .~rURI~+TE'~; 1, 4. ~ ~Iil SQ~T~F~ y~S. 14 h+oa to tit are in~cted only h~ #,be an"e 14 R ~ ~.d a ~ wig 't~ 1~ ~l~p~cat. And they anC '#' to do $lt~ ~~ ~[t~nt that oat ~pn$ #,h ter stn 411 1~ ' , wu1l. And tie ineh $ t~rt-1a~ -- I 1~ ~rt~un tr, ud the impt~ttts that ~ ~ ~~ just y ~S. A o~tiuuo~ bra alb 1'~ 1y' ~ k~ ~ Ted t r~gmeats i8 Tray that i.t basally, be a rnid~1~ 1 that 1~ are ptab~e t~ fibs pity. And tha~t'~ w>> th+~'r~ 1~ r u~ #~ you e~ fry 1~ sv ~ tl la~~~t. ~ "tiui]. ~ ~~IISSII~riTEI~ 2~i7-T~: may. 'Tlt~nk yon ~~ TyT alp a~ibuting ~a ~ t ns. ~ ~rmdifi~ati a~ ' at t iut~euti~, I~i~I~A~ER Fri': Afl~ ut~ ~~ ~$ f -+11~ 1 ~ ~~~ ~1~ ,C ~~ ~~g? ~4 tl]~ ~~ t~]St t. ~it~ $ -- ~ ~~ ~4 88 ~ ~~~ ~ Wl ~~ } ~~~ $1$'~'l ~'~ ~ r ~~ a1C~ ~~`~ ~ ~1~5, I SL]$~$ ~4'~~ 11C~ ~~ PI+A~]I~IIhT ~1 ~ ~I~ ~~~ t-~~ ~ ~a ~ Pa~~ 1 19 d~eI~~ ~a~e 13 1 t~ pub it t~ ~ ~ ~ o I her ~ m f~ a~p~va1~ ~ '' '- +t++T++v~k~~ii~ aJ.L~IU: 11'1riRl'Ir N4+ ~~~~jr # ~14 ~l~Lll: ~il ,3 ~y~~~yp a ~ ~S~I~N~1~'1`fi~MA~: 0~. ~ ~ ~9,~f ~F~1"I1~l+1; ~ ~~ 6 ~ ~r ~, I.+~t'~ Vie. R'~ ~1 nit ~bl~ ~ S ~ vote ~n t~ 1d? ~ ~ . ~C]~[L: ~V~ d~ntt haV~ ~ ~p ~ 10 the I -- ~~ 11 ~ ~ ~ IVI~ER ~AdI~N; ~k~y, 1$~fy 1 ~ i~ vie, ~, ~ ~ Y~ ~ ., ~ v ~}~ 1~ 1~ ram yr ~ ~t~ p~ 1~ I4 ~-~. 14 1~ 1~ 1b ~ 1~ ~~ ~ 1~ 18 ~ ~ 1~ 1~ ~ 1~ ~~ 2~ ~~ ~1 ~ ~~ ~3 ~ 3 2# ~ ~4 ~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~~ 1~ 1~ i~ ~ ~~ 1~ 13 14 ~~ t~ ~ t~ ~~ ~~ 17 t~ ~s ~~ 1~ 1~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~1T~ Alm ~ I~~L I~' ~~~~7 Page 15 P~ 1 ~ Pad ~ ~ - Pay ~ ~ 20 nntl ~ ~ag~ 17 1 ~~~I Li: I~am B ~f ~ani~ i~ F'i~,l Flat ` Lot lr ~fk A ~ . 3 Hi~ ( ~ fit Tie ~ 4 1. ~-acre i~ l~ at #be a~~thw ~~'~` ~` ~ Teasley Ia~,c ~d Hiu~ry~ 1 a~ is aid within ~ ~ ~crh~od Real Mid ~ If ~ apps the fi~a1 flat w~ n~~ f~l ~til 8 app1~`c~,t ~a~ reivcd written appra~ral f rim ~ ~q~ ~~~'r'~. ~~~ ~i~ ~I~; r~ c that ~ ~ ~ mi~~phone aid t~cad cur std 1~ tic iflGo the ~~, ~~ ~i~ ESN: fir. ~~taff', 1~ . 1~ +IEY: 'Thatik you. 'I'ds plat f~ 1~ ~~ ~~,i18Il~P$ W~$]Ll~ yid 1? ~. And, ~vC~ 1 off i$ ~ plat 1$ ~ app~v~ ~ to the ~f ~ ~l~ml ~~ ~~~~~~ ~ filing ~f ap~rd ~Iat tln~1 sn~h $ ~~ app~os $ll ~1~ f~+r a~aca.aiapd ' ~ t$ oa 'I'lc~ ~~ Iat~d a~ ~ialcary 1 is ~~ ~ ~3 tie rams, it~eludir~g ~~ all A ~iv~vay aad utility p~,m~~, ~5 ~ EAIJLI~: ~. Ira I her a l~ag~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ a~ ~f r~ ~ #~at t~ t~ spaa~~ ~ I4I~~I+IF~ LE'1'I~I~: ~ W~ ~8i ~ hd~riISN~ ~R5~1~: i t ~ ~tio~, ~ L£T~f; ~a rnctiun is t~ ~ tab1~ t1~ until ~ ~~rta;nr bei, - ~ ~ i~; ~ y~~ jug ~ ~~ I~ ~ mot. I~I..; ~ry ~#hF ~~~, 11 ~ ~tI~I.! E~i~iL~TI1R~: - #~ ~ 1~ . ~ ~ Ja~ua t ~00~. ~ vas ham ~ mntian_ I we ~~ a sec~ad~ 14 ~SY L5'~E; cn~. ~~ Ur. ~.yk~. 'I~ m~ti~a w madc ~~ s. Anon. Alt i~ 1? fav~,` rain ~1 T~ macs 1~ -~~ ~~ ~~ ~3 ~4 ~~ lea ~ 8 ~ ~atrua~ ] ~ 1~d~II 'Y'S~MA~: I ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~~II PA~LET~+T: ~~tI~1 ~ ~~ ~ . ~ 1S8Li ~S by 8p~'~.y~, ¢ ~ ~DIt$N~ LYSS: i~. ~ ~ ~OMMI~SD EA~LS~I~: coa,~ ~y ~. Lam, ~ 7 A11 in ~~v~ siy ~~ rai~rg your ti~hl had. 7 B ~p~s ~ A wu w~~d li.~ ~ pu~li~ ~ i~ ~~`i~g. 'I'h~ iten7 ~ t,1~ p~iic heating i$ fni.ti~l t~ 1 ! rit of appr~l ~ ~~. gyres lm~ fir a 1 I 1~ Ruraf dial ~I~• ~ di~i ~a the ~ 1~ 1~ ~ Flan~d ~~Qeity ~nit~~ district, 13 ~~ . ~..I.: I~r, , staff wa~uld ~~ ~~ ~attti~etn~~id ~~ 1$ Yi~Gnt 1.lCftll the ,T~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ 1'~ ~lanaing ~ p] ~ 1~ ~~ ~I4IIIt~ LEAN: '• 1$ 1~ 1!~+ilL ~RA~E; If cold, the ~ 14 #o ~a cl and puhl.i~ g fir phis. Aid ~U ~ 1 t if is ~ n~d~n ~ p~ t until t,~aC ~1 ~~' pan ham a vaFte ~t a~ad ~~ it ~ y tea with~~ h~ to ~act#i~. ~~ ~~I~hi$~ ~AL~1~I~: ~. 0 ~~ ~U~~iG hr~in~ 1~ r ~ ~[ ~~ I s ~T~I-~ ~L~ AID ~` IT ~ ~ 21 ~~ ~ P 1 Pie ~ ~ ably ,1 ass ~ eigrld ~ i~ A+d TJe~ 1 ~ ~ I~~r1d 3 4 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ . [fir, F -~ ~ last its, the ' w~ rmtn~n~, ~ gam, firs ~ . 7 that the pub~i.c ~ be aspen and t~uk p~adiryg that, 7 S w~u~d rrm~nd that h~l~ uur ~ ~ ~~t ~ t Jay nth, ~~~ p11.~ ]rite. ~ 1~ ~Ixd~NBR SA~Lg'l~h~; okay, '~'be p~hli~ 1 ~ i~ is nv~ . An~r ea~en stia~s? Ida I ~ 1 1~ her a ~'~ 1 ~ ~~ ~IB~'rrridA~; i m far ~. 1 ~4 ~~ . I eve the the item 1 tpd mil 14 1~ ~aeti nn January t1x .. ~ 1 ~ ~~ , ' 'iri11'11l~RI 1~11iPf ~ ~]],$ ~~ ~ ~~ ti of ~at~ry ~. I ~ 7 iS 1~ ~Y+i LAB: fond. ~~ ~~ ~Ii~R EA~IEI'~N: ~. ~n~ b ~1 ]fir. Lam. Ali i~ fav~ sits rata car rat ~1 ~~ hand. o p~+es ~. ~~ ~3 ~ ~ ~3 ~4 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~a~e Pic 4 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 4 ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ 7 7 ~ ~ iD 1~ 11 ~1 1~ 1 1~ 1~ 14 ~ 1~ 1S 1~ 1~ 1~ 17 17 1$ 18 1~ 1~ ~Q ~l ~1 ~~ 17~ ~1]I~T~r ~ 'I ~ ~ 1-~-~~T Pad 1- ~eg~ ~ 22 C',andenseit! ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~orr~ ~4~..E~rr: Itd~a ~ is the I ~ ~p~ ~,T~it t ~11~w a ti~a~l~r relment in ~ a I~~ Rtial Mixed Use i ~ ~ 4 This ~ ~.l~~cne I~~ is l~cat.~d ~a 4 ~ nth ~~ Ivlinn ~ ~e,st ~ ~ paxk i~ ~ . ~ tl later within a eiorhaad p[tlt1~ ~+Iix$d ~ ~ ~ 1~ 7l5f11ri~ di.ri.~~ 7 ~ Ri~S r. {~r~ Knee agar we $ ~ wed reaQmmend that this ~a ~ ~ a~v~.t ~ i~ ~ti1 J~u~y tie ~tb, ~4$ with t~ ~u~ ~ I~ 11 open. 11 1~ G~M14dI5SIiF1i EARN: . Tha puhli~ 1~ ~~ - i~ open. cs~.a~s? its? I I hear ~ i~ 1~ n~tio~7 14 1~ ~+D~~iEEt ~.: ~ males a m~ti~ that t ~ 1 ~ tahl~ uQti,~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~O~IiEk ~A~t: ~vtntio~ has been 17 . iS c by~I~r. Lyl~c that w~ t~bhr t~i~ Jauu . I~ 1S 1~ i T ~ SCaa~d7 ~ 1~ ~ ~x~: mud. ~I ~QIR~~IE~ EA~LE'T: ~n~1 ~1 mmi$~i ~'h~a~. All in fiver ~fY bI+ r~~ you right hid. s. finder ~d eu het a ~ okay. ' ~~ 2~4 v~t~ ~a~s X40. ~4 ~5 ~ ~ $ 1 I ~ 2 3 4 4 S ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ 1~ I~ 11 11 1~ 1~ 1~ 1~ 14 1~ 1~ 1~ 1G 1~ ~~ ~~ i~ i$ i~ 1~ o ~~ ~~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ . ~~ ~E~T~I~ P~ 1 ~I AEI, EI~T f -1-~'~ ~a ~ - Page 23 aa~It! ~` Fad ~ 1 C~1'R 1L~'1T; Item D iS t ~ In~.al ~f apxirna~ly .1 e~re~ of Ind ~ 3 1t~1 ~~iati.al ~ -- tl~t'~ ~ hard a to sa~r - aam 4 district ~ I~el`ld ltcsial Nfiaed Use ~nin~ ~ distri.ck rraia~ ~f` apply I.3~ gyres ~f 1 ~ fry a Tbar~ad sid~nti.ai ~ distn.c~ ~a ~ 7 I6onc~od Resi~ntial i~Ii Use ~ni dislti. 8 s.I4~a~ev~s. 9 s. w~: 'Ink you The property 1 ~ xd ~ lamed ~1 ~ sib of Teasle~r 11 I aa~ t ~f 1~ R. ~~ t is 1~ a f~Y home > on tl pe~e1 which aer~it~~ 1 ~ to the np~i witl be delisted. t~ Joixrx I~. uy~er Hid ho~Ol is directly I~ nth of subje p~apexty, 'I'l~ 1~~ to 1 ~ west i$ ~vned ~ I~lectric Ualiv~y a~Ir. "Ihe 1'~ ~ the is vac~t. F t is I$ 13s Karp aany~ t~cy a~lsa ~.i~ vacant land ~~ , T~ ~ s i~ mgstly vacant ~1 hQnver, It~n l~ l~arlc i~ lamed ~f acct ~~. 2~ As you n from t~ rip, Est ~4 #~ subj # p;'ty ~1R~ I~rd lsitiai . 'T'he apps .1~-ate tract ~f laid lid ~~ 1 ~t ~f tl~ subject l~~ e ~ itrGa lvii. Its ourt~k Ming ~ its i.riitial ~atring ~ 5 I~ul sideutial, ~ Tl~ fiat r of t anne~a~~a ~ ~ ~rdirfe way by tilt it as ber 6th, ~~0'7. ~ The ~eao~d rea~~ teas hid h'Y pity Caunal nn r '~ 11tI~ ~~~?~ $ 'I"he s~uraundi ~nin~ is ru. T~iis is ~ future harnc ~ Faith TJui#ud ~~ ~h Air 1~ the ~ ~ IliverY P'~ It's ~ and elan 11 in the ETJ. ]~ Bath para~ls ~n ci~Cr sib of Old luau 1~ Rid a~ ~ ha~~ad iatial I1+C ~,T. 'i'bis i 14 Dt~ ~r l~ueis~ lark Indu~rial r FiaYr~nt. i~ This property 1 ~ct]l~r I~ld A1taa~ Ir~d~sttial I~ P~~~ And, ~~Y1~11S1~, C ~ is pt~ loc~od I'~ wrtbia EI'J. 1~ The aPplint i~ pm~posit I~Rb~if1 fit t~ ~t~ ~,~•3[~ $l~t Wl1lCh ~ I pa~~~~ rill, ~C~, 2'~5~ ~1 The pr~p~rty i~ ignet~d ~ an Etin~ ~ Ind I.I~llnfill ~patibility filhn7e end ~esi~dtii ~~ in the id's futa~re plan. a, ess~nti~1]}~, ~a~puia~ ~4 e fits i~ with ~ e~isti~ charaat~r of the stns. A~ I'Il r to f I]cn#an Plan whet F~~Ce 31 1 Eaistimg Ltd U~Jlnfill mp~tihili futua~ lid use ~ clas®f'i mss. 3 "i e~~b1d ridtial } new 4 development sh~l~ rip ~a e~is de~elo~ment with 5 ~i~e lid ~s ~ea~, aid ~ s1~ad~rds. 6 plan ~ that ~xiatit~g ncigh~s wi#~n ~ pity be vi~~~s1 prate and preserved. ~~using that S is ~mpadble with e~fii~g density, aeb~ho~d ~ iee~ and tru~~a.a1 laid u~ca is alla~vcd." 1~ Tint said, taf~ in supgart ~f the ~~ i.~g fr~a x~ ~ a ~•~ to x.r. 1~ 'T'his j gev~es a haa~f codmpa ~ ~3 aial it in ~, the ttt ~nin~, 14 ~- A~ y ~n s nit ~ ases nit 1~ permitted in IwiR•~, why, the uses p~rmattl ire 1~ xt[.l with limitati cr specific putt d tle 17 limit~ti.a~ prnvi.ded to ynu in y~ badoup. 1$ This i~ east ~ few phis of ail 1~ side. 'I'he first i~ the ~thwe~t earner ~ at ~0 tuba ~. dyer Hi~ ~1F Tim ~ John H. ~1 ~r1. This is the nw~est rner low south alb ~2 ~ ~~~. '!'his is the of thn aanexatian and ~ryjug. ~3 'This ~ t~ s~ut~ 1~ rthe~t. 'I h~u ~4 ' ~ dy as the Arty which will be dcm~listl. ~ AEI his the t r lnal nc~th at I site, ~ ~~ o~ p~~lic h wet seat to 3 pry nvs within Q t oaf t~ par~perty, ineludiag 4 Ivan Independ heal I~istri. and cry t~tiees ~ e seat to ~ with ~4~ feet of subject, ~ And ~f this ~~ ~ ha$ ant nive~d a '~ resp~ans~ ~it~r way, ~ And a~ I me~~d eaalicr, ~#'f' ~ ids apprnv~l ~f the q~d it~~ ~ as the i~ finding tb~ the use and depm~nt standard 11 aantained vrith the pn~ I~Ri~1 pair district~arc in 1~ chara~t~er v~ith tlse a~jt ~ni. And this requ~k is s 1~ ~n 1 with # D~artoa futr~ p1~n. 14 'The applicant's ~tativc is 1~ I Can nas~cr any questions, if I ~Y. If I cap. 1~ ~ ..Err; I we have gay 17 qutis far ~ 1$ ~,~I~#ER TFi~Ad*A,S~: yI'.,.~yw~i8ng to ask 1~ W~ Nk iL~J WiLLl LLiG p~r ~~ ~l~t ~ J1a~t r~i~d It wow Y 1 'C ~i pli~1e ~ ask the applicant, t]> yau, ~~ r~. ~: Okay. ~~ ~ ~'~x; Th~,~ yin, s. ~4 ttl. ~~ fir, e'11 n the public Ding. i~a~ ~ - ~a~~ ~ 24 Coade~elt! T" ~ Fiat of ~1, i.~ the a~piieant ~ De try t~ ~ spy? . 3 hdt~. LAIdB: 'I'l~nk ynu. ~ ~~~ err, ~ ~u'u s y ~, yF ~ ut~. ~1B: , sir, ~+fr, airman, I'm ~ ~lllrs I with ~ A~ieute~ G~~9 E1t~ ~ F~ 8 Texas. Ate I'in henc tight nn hchalf' of the appli~mt, 9 Y~~ld i~#aug messing, ltd, I ~r hey clic~t~ ~ u~ 1~ with ~~ ti's a . ~ ~ A y~ t hay tt we11 1~ prnte~ all of to y toait. I rally just donlt 13 ~}' lmusual iaeaea I ~ thug of ~~- ~nc~, t~ Y. I' ~ fat that %~ ~ tl~ raan 1 ~ theme that kind ~f n~trat that theme will nit he 1~ 3s fin this site to the 5eh~ I that that milt ~7 thing of ~nrn with the won. I~ As far a8 use, tire's rYO foal 1~ at this time. It Wight be a d plate for ~u cti~t, I d~~~ k we~~ jug ~ wait ~1 yard . I dan't tea prC this ~~ than ~ t~ fut~ne, yon 1, T~wsl ~ ~~i is ~ ~4 he im~~vad a~ tie ill be ~ ~ at the ~~ Schaal drivov~ry. Y'm pretty conf`it #haot will haven. ~4 I ~l~ ~ilt~n, t will be a driveway #> ~ ~vil~ probably nul ~cc~s fr- the speeifi~ ~ tough abxittit~g sib ~ - p~~a~1y whcn t1~ 4 ~i~pat eee~trst it v~ilt mut<ial aecese to than ~ opeu~~ ever ~ Ait~. Tt~r+e 't he ~ driveways ea+.uae r won't a~llc~w tlx~ sa Gk's dust ~t '] g to a oared or aetti piece of p~p~tyF $ It's a sits. ~ I ~ tl~t's $11 I havc to sue, urn t0 yat~ have moans. li [~~I~NER ~~: may, I we have 1~ ~ ~ for the applies? I mess tit" s it4 1~ ~ you, j4 : Thank yaa t~ ~slox~ EAl~IEN: Aid thaot 1~ aal}~ it'd tlraot w~ > qtt t its i~ ~ d~ro mop ~f ash if tg t1~~ ~ to in ~~ Any yak 1~ in st:~ Anlr to ~ in . firing n~ane, ia..tbe~ pane #~ ~ ~1 ~ oo~iti~~ Any~e to speak in oppositi,~? ~ ~ seek in ~padtiQn? ~~ Irittig mac, we'd e1 public 4 h~rin~ ~~ I I h~ a mntic~'~ ~~~C ~~ ~ Q~A+ih~SSII~'sR TH4Ii ~117C~ tl~ ~Ql1lG5 ~ ~ w~~ sc wetll just d~ ~t t~ ald fealn~ , 3 I movwc f~ va1 bated u f$~t ~ tit ' tl~ o~t~hcr propcs ~ #hc have ~ ~ ~~ yea ~. ~ ~x I.1~'i~x: okay, Tha moti.cn '} der t~ apgrave. I.~a I hear a B sec~tl'~ ~ C~~t~1 era; ~n~. 1~ ~(?I,SI(}i~iEA~xLEI~N~ ~ 11 i~ianer . Please siy dour v by z~ . 1~ yvur ri~t - All opppsed. ~ mac, the vat 13 ~~aes ~~. I4 And I think ~ other ~t~ls# I thin 1~ #hat ccnols r m~kir, Ike have any new irress 1~ Ga attend t~a7 17 I ao call tk~s ti ~ $t ~;~~ p.m. 1$ 'I'hatdC yau. t~ ~~ ~1 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ DI'II~ ~~h1I1~ ~I~iIl~~ F~ ~-1~7 Pay - P~~ ~ 25 EXHIBIT 10 ORDINANCE ~T~rT , AID ~1TI~~ F THE I'I' ~F ~E`~T, T~~a ~II~ F ~~ HAS FR~I~i THE ~TIl~1 F,IHB~1~H~I~ II~'IL ~- X11 i~ITRI*I' LAIFI~iTIO AID [~~ ~~~~"~I~ ITT ~ Fi~'1'~I~ ~ ~T~i1iIT IlT ~~ Il 1~~TI~~ FO1~TI~1~~ NTH ~~Ti~ T'xETI~E II~lPTI ~~~' 1. 111 OF il~]~ LTE~ ~I~ TIE IitTH ~E ~F TE~i~ i~ ~ 1 ~1~ ~]U ~1THET ~F O~ LT~r~ R: ~ I~iTIl~Cr THE Il~~i ~F T IE~ ~~i CTD~ THIS ~iHB~H~ IIr IVlii~ ~~ ~~ ~Cx DITI'i' ~I~I.TI1 I~]~ L~~ D~~1T~~; ADD F[JRTI~I~ FIl~ F~ ~LT3~ III THE I~L~Ti IJT F ~,.~~ FRIL~A'FII~ THE~E~F, II I~I~ ~'~'IE DTB. ~~?- ~ .. r ilk ~ r~~ i~t,, 1i f~~ ~ I~~i~h~~ l~sld~n~al Mix L~~~ ~Cl ~ d.is~rit ~~a~i~i~i~ end u~~ ti ~~ima~ 1.~ yes ~f1~ ~ ~i,~n ~f whiff i~ ~lur~ti~~~ih~~rhti.al ~- a~1~er awaiting initi~~ ; aid ~EA~ ~mher t # ~, air ~~lu ~ e~~til ~u~1i leg to ~~ with 11 qui~ement the Fig ~~n ~ ~ ~f a~~ iti~1 p~~}~ #i.d puhli~ hearing in ~ its 1~1 raquir, the i~ ~~m~il fins that tie ~ is ~t~t t~ # I~et~a~ Flan a~~ the ~~v~1~~ er O} TFRE~ THE T.7~ F THE ~'~` ~F i~~TI~ HERB ~1~: ~ . ETI~ 1, The his a its ~a~ i~ ~ ~~1~ ~~thi~ ~rdi~:~ ate inc~p~rat~d herein ~ f as a.e. ETI , T1~ ~~ning ~iit ~1~~~~i~~tia~ ~ ~~~~n i . ~ 1 acres ~~ d m Fti~iy ~i~ri in Ex~ihit ~`~ ~~ ~i~ in Fibit `~~~, b~t~ ~~h~ ~tta~h her ~~rate hin ~ re~~ ~ "~~~'~~ i~ ~ ~h~ng ~a ~r ~sta~~ia~ ~ I~~~~h~ dal Mixed ~s~ ~ ink ~i~t Ali , '~ tl a~t~h~d real pa~pert ~ti~n, ~Y ~~ n inclu~~~ ~1t ~r~p~rt to the ccnter~in~ ~f ~1 ~~ street ~i~~ ~. 4 ~'I1 . The its ~~i1 ],~n~ is h~ ebb amp ~ ~ e ~ ~ i~ ~~ l.~n~ a ~caigtian. . FT , If ~vi~~o~ ~~thi~ ~r~in ~r ap~li~a~o~ ~her~~'t~ ~~ a~ ei~oe i~ hI~ inva~ ~ any ~, invaii~ity sh~~ riot a-t alit ~f qtr vi,~ ~r ~pp~c~ns~ and to t~i~ ~n~ the pm~ia~ ~~t~a.~~~e a vb~e. 26 FT~I~ ~ A p~r~~n ~ia~a~n and p.~avi~ion ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~n ~ yam ~ cdi ~4.~~{ Fah dip t~ ~ ~~~vi~i ~#`~ ~~c is ~ia1 F~'I~~1 . "~`hi~ ~r~ic~ ~1 ~~ ~~o ~ ~~4~ ~ fmt t~ ~f~#~ ~r~lh~d tai in t~ ~~~ ~~~~1~a ~ 1 ~ ~ i~ ~, ~~ ~ ~t ~P~ ~ ~" ~ r~ 27 .f ..- ~I~~ ~~~ ~E~ 1~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~, ~~ ~~ ~ ~l~yi +#~I.~[Ty~~f •~Ely^~}' ~N 11~E ~EH[}~y~ ~~r ~ ~ ~ ~[..J~~r#~ ~ i`E~k~I.EY ' ~`ry'~~~.'+.~ypr~lJ Y1i4~~~1yyy~~~ ~F~~F7*ple ~ 7.1, ~~{~.~{ R ~1-~EE ~ ~#~'° 1~'~1~'a`~ T ! ~ ~I~d ~``!' ~kN `I~IE- 1~IE~T ~~1~1~• ~ EVE ~~, ~~~.~ I~ET T~~l ~~" ~ ~ hID 1~ ~ P ~T~1+P.~ ~f, ~~ T~-IE T ~~ ~F I~ E~ 1~'f ~I I~ ~`!~E ICI Rf~~~ ~, ~~~1 ~1-IE RIB ~IiEE AID ~ ~~~ a ~ ~A,~~ ~1 , ~ S~l~ ~I#~M-Ti 1~fE T~ FAT I ~ ~ t.l~ • .1 ~. ~•~ * 'IV ~?'i{= ~. °•' •• L:i . ~ti •.••r ' ~ ••'~ ':.mss.. r ~ + ~rf'+• TJ I . ~~ ~ _ , fir. .~ i L.iFR.+,~} 28 ~~~~ ~ EXHIBIT B LOCATION MAP 29 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development Department ACM: Fred Greene SUBJECT Z06-0029 and Z06-0030 (Rayzor Ranch) Hold a public hearing and consider the adoption of an ordinance regarding amendments to the Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District encompassing approximately 410 acres of land located generally on both sides of U.S. Highway 380 (West University Drive), between Interstate Highway 35 and Bonnie Brae Street; providing for a zoning change from Neighborhood Residential 6 (NR-6) and Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning districts to base zoning districts of Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) for approximately 87 acres of the site south of U.S. 380 as well as amending of the development standards for the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and establishing development standards (including but not limited to permitting single family detached, single family attached, multifamily and office uses) applicable to a portion of the subject property which lies south of U.S. Hwy 380; and amending Chapter 35, Subchapter 7 of the City of Denton Code of Ordinances, "Denton Development Code", "Special Purpose and Overlay Districts" to amend section 35.7.13 "Rayzor Ranch Overlay District". BACKGROUND Applicant: Allegiance Development Dallas, TX Allegiance Development has submitted a request to rezone a portion of the Rayzor Ranch Development and amend the existing Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District. The entire subject property encompasses approximately 410 acres of land located generally on the north and south sides of U. S. Highway 3 80 (West University Drive), between Interstate Highway 35 and Bonnie Brae Street (See Exhibit 2). The parcel north of U.S. 380 contains approximately 153 acres (Northern Tract) and is currently undeveloped except for a vacant self storage facility (partially demolished) (See Exhibit 3). The applicant proposes to construct a combination of retail and single family residential uses (See Exhibit 4). The parcel south of U.S. 380 contains approximately 257 acres (Southern Tract) and is undeveloped (a single family structure was recently removed) (Exhibit 6). The applicant is proposing to develop a combination of retail (pad sites and an outdoor mall), residential (single family and multifamily), two hotels, offices, museums and park uses (See Exhibit 7). On March 27, 2007, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Northern Tract from "Neighborhood Centers", "Existing Land Use" and "Community Mixed Use Centers" land use designations to "Regional Mixed Use Centers" and "Neighborhood Centers" land use designations. The Council also approved the first phase of the Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District for the entire 410 acre Rayzor Ranch site and a rezoning of 53.65 acres of the Northern Tract from Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 (NRMU-12), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Community Mixed Use General (CM-G) zoning districts to a base zoning district of Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) as modified by the Overlay District On May 15, 2007, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the Southern Tract from "Neighborhood Centers" to "Regional Mixed Use Centers" and "Neighborhood Centers" land use designations. The Council also approved the second phase of the Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District which amended the standards of the District and provided for a zoning change on approximately 223 of the total 410 acres of land within the District from Neighborhood Residential 6 (NR-6), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 (NRMU-12), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Community Mixed Use General (CM-G) zoning districts to a base zoning district of Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D). The zoning change request included approximately 53 acres within the Northern Tract and 170 acres within the Southern tract. The City Council is being asked to consider the third phase of the Rayzor Ranch project at this time, which includes the following: 1. Rezoning approximately 87 of the total 410 acres from NR-6 and NRMU zoning districts to base zoning districts of NRMU and RCC-D as further modified by the Overlay District. The subject 87 acres are located south of U.S. 380. No additional rezoning of the Northern Tract is being_proposed at this time. 2. Amending the 410 acre Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District to make minor modifications and corrections as well as incorporate new standards that if approved would: a. Permit single family detached (up to 185 units), single family attached (up to 496 units), multifamily (up to 750 units) and office uses in the Southern Tract subject to Section 35.5.9 of the Denton Development Code (see GENERAL ISSUES, Residential Development below). b. Correct the zoning boundary description to match subsequent plats. c. Replace the Master Site plan with the most updated version to reflect the latest development layout. d. Add language that clearly defines park and open space maintenance shall be by Homeowners Association or Property Owners Association. e. Ensure all ordinance exhibits are correct. f. Correct conflicting language between wood fence and masonry wall requirements as they are located behind the large retail boxes. 2 g. Delay requirement to install buffer landscaping on Bonnie Brae until after DME substation and a proposed 36" waterline have been completed. h. Allow residential phases to move forward conceptually, require detailed site plan at a later time. i. Require Specific Use Permits for all gas well development. The final phase of the Rayzor Ranch rezoning and Overlay District amendments should include the remaining 46 acres of the site north of U.S. 380 on which single family and/or drainage facilities are being proposed. The applicant's request for special sign consideration will also be brought forward for public hearing at a later date. The properties surrounding the entire 410-acre site are being sent notices for each phase of public hearings since the proposed standards affect property on both sides of U.S. 380. Public notification information is provided in Exhibit 10. As of this writing, staff has not received responses from property owners within 200 feet of the subject site. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW 1. December 6, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Proposed Mobility Plan Amendment for Rayzor Ranch 2. January 10, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing Regarding Proposed Mobility Plan Amendment for Rayzor Ranch (The Commission recommended approval 7-0) 3. February 20, 2007 City Council Public Hearing Regarding Proposed Mobility Plan Amendment for Rayzor Ranch (The Council approved 7-0) 4. February 21, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Northern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment 5. February 28, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Proposed Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 6. March 7, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session Regarding Proposed Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 7. March 14, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session and Public Hearing Regarding Northern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and First Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0) 8. March 27, 2007 city Council Public Hearing Regarding Northern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and First Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District (The City Council Approved 7-0) 9. April 2, 2007 City Council Work Session Regarding Southern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Remaining Phases of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 10. April 18, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Regarding Work Session Regarding Southern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Remaining Phases of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 11. May 9, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session and Public Hearing Regarding Southern Tract Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Second Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and Rezoning. (The Commission recommended approval 7-0) 12. May 15, 2007 City Council Public Hearing Regarding Completion of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Second Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District (City Council Approved 7-0) 13. November 28, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session and Public Hearing Regarding Third Phase of Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and Rezoning. (The Commission recommended approval 6-0) (1PTT(1N~ 1. Approve as submitted. 2. Approve subject to conditions. 3. Deny. 4. Table item. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. EXHIBITS 1. Staff Analysis 2. Aerial Overview of Entire Subject Property 3. Aerial of Northern Tract 4. Site Plan of Northern Tract 5. Existing Zoning for Northern Tract 6. Aerial of Southern Tract 7. Site Plan of Southern Tract 8. Existing Southern Tract Zoning 9. Proposed Southern Tract Zoning 10. Notification Map 11. Public Notification Responses 12. Tree Mitigation Plan 13. Architectural Guidelines 14. Drainage Exhibit 15. Approved Conceptual Zoning Plan for Northern Tract 16. Approved Conceptual Zoning Plan for Southern Tract 17. Proposed Conceptual Zoning Plan for Southern Tract 18. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -November 28, 2007 19. Ordinance 4 Prepared by: 4.. ~~ ~~ :4 ~~~ .~ ~ .,t ~ r ~¢ ~ .h}. ..~ <~ ., ,r ~f:.r ~... t .. r: },: :, .. ~:7: -..,. .. 2 ~... .. .. .. .... •:L.v. 9.' i. ... . ZN . . Chuck Russell, AICP Planner III Respectfully submitted: ., :,~ E. ~ r k. ~~ ~~. r" z.R. k ti Brian Lockley, AICP Interim Director of Planning & Development EXHIBIT 1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT STAFF ANAL YS/S CASENO: Z06-0029, Z06-0030 DATE TO BE CONSIDERED: January 8, 2008 LOCATION: The property is located on both sides of U. S. Highway 3 80 (West University Drive) between Interstate Highway 3 SN and Bonnie Brae Street OWNER/ Allegiance Development APPLICANT: 14881 Quorum Drive, Suite 950 Dallas, TX 75254 RE VEST: Consider the adoption of an ordinance amending the Rayzor Ranch Special Purpose Overlay District encompassing approximately 410 acres of land located generally on both sides of U.S. Highway 380 (West University Drive), between Interstate Highway 35 and Bonnie Brae Street; providing for a zoning change from Neighborhood Residential 6 (NR-6) and Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning districts to base zoning districts of Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) for approximately 87 acres of the site south of U.S. 380 as well as amending of the development standards for the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District and establishing development standards (including but not limited to permitting single family detached, single family attached, multifamily and office uses) applicable to a portion of the subject property which lies south of U.S. Hwy 380; and amending Chapter 3 5, Subchapter 7 of the City of Denton Code of Ordinances, "Denton Development Code", "Special Purpose and Overlay Districts" to amend section 35.7.13 "Rayzor Ranch Overlay District" RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ZONING Neighborhood Residential 6 (NR-6), Neighborhood DISTRICTS: Residential Mixed Use 12 (NRMU-12), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) and Rayzor Ranch Overlay District. COMPREHENSI VE PLAN DESIGNATIONS: "Neighborhood Centers" and "Regional Mixed Use Centers" SITEAND SURROUNDINGS: The property is currently undeveloped. 6 North: Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 (NRMU-12); Office, Townhome, Single Family Detached, Undeveloped Land and a Church East: Neighborhood Residential 2 (NR-2), Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3), Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use 12 (NRMU-12) and Community Mixed Use General (CM-G); City Parks, Retail and Single Family South: Downtown Commercial General (DC-G) and Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D); Hospital and Office West: Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D), Community Mixed Use General (CM-G) and Industrial Center Employment (IC-E); Retail, Commercial, Lodging and Undeveloped Land BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Northern Tract: The applicant is proposing to develop approximately 892,000 total square feet of commercial uses on the Northern tract which will consist of 454,000 square feet in three "big box" retail centers 287,000 square feet of smaller "junior box" retail uses 100,000 square feet of stand alone retail, office and restaurant uses in addition to approximately 112 single family detached and attached units (townhomes). Two gas well pads are also proposed along the north side of the subject site. The retail portion of the Northern Tract will comprise approximately 107 acres with the residential area using the most of the remaining 46 acres. The Northern Tract will also include approximately 9 acres of open space that is being set aside to serve primarily as a drainage and water quality feature (This area may increase in size). There is also a large water mitigation area being proposed on the northwest side of the tract. The applicant has worked with staff to utilize the latest guidelines from the North Central Texas Council of Governments regarding control of the materials that typically flow off of commercial property during storms. The water quality feature will be the first of its kind in Denton and will help prevent materials from entering North Lakes pond across Bonnie Brae Street from the site. The approved commercial zoning for the Northern Tract is based on the Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) zoning district as modified by the Overlay District. The permitted uses have been modeled on the attached Master Site Plan (Exhibits 4 and 7) The request to change the base zoning for the proposed single family residential subarea will be brought forward for public hearing at a later date. Southern Tract: The applicant is proposing to develop a total of approximately 1,166,000 square feet of commercial uses on the Southern Tract which will consist of 450,000 square feet in three large department stores, a junior anchor and a book store; 419,000 square feet of retail, theater and food court uses incorporated into the outdoor mall; and 234,000 square feet of stand alone retail, restaurant and grocery store uses. Two 8 to 10 story hotels, a continuing care facility and approximately 360,000 square feet of office space are also 7 being proposed. Finally, the applicant is proposing to develop approximately 185 single family detached units, and 496 single family attached units (townhomes) and up to 750 multifamily units on the Southern Tract. Two gas well pads are proposed along the east (Bonnie Brae) side of the subject site. The Southern Tract will also include approximately 18.21 acres park land which includes a 15-acre central park that is planned to contain an outdoor entertainment facility and one or two museums. The proposed zoning for the portion of the Southern Tract that is under consideration at this time will be based on the Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) zoning district and the Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district as modified by the Overlay District. Staff is recommending the permitted uses be modeled on the attached Master Site Plan (Exhibit 7). GENERAL ISSUES: Trees The applicant will plant as many trees as possible within the boundaries of the Rayzor Ranch development (Exhibit 12) to mitigate for previously removed trees on site. This exhibit was approved by City Council as a part of the first phase of the Overlay District on March 27, 2007. A 15-acre park is proposed within the Southern Tract that will provide an opportunity for new tree planting. Staff has also provided the applicant with off site tree planting options in North Lakes Park and along the median of Windsor Street. An escrow fund to cover the cost of the mitigation trees will be required through a developer's agreement. To date this escrow account has not been funded by the applicant. The applicant has been reminded that building permits will not be issued for this development until the escrow account has been funded. Architectural Design Subchapter 13 of the Denton Development Code regulates the site and architectural design standards for residential and nonresidential development. Staff has encouraged the applicant to provide a unified architectural theme throughout the proposed development to enhance the special nature of the proposed development and help justify the need to modify the standard regulations in the Code through the use of a Special Purpose Overlay District. Some modifications to these Code requirements have already been approved to accommodate their development. Some of these modifications are less restrictive than the Code and some are more restrictive. The retail structures will be required to provide building materials and colors on walls visible from streets that exceed the current Code requirements. The final text for staff's recommended architectural guidelines will be brought forward with the next phase of the Overlay District for consideration. Staff is recommending that prior to the issuance of a building permit for any use other than retail, final design guidelines must be approved by City Council. In the meantime, elevations were previously approved and are attached in Exhibit 13 that establish guidelines for the retail development until the text is adopted. The standards for the big box retail were approved by City Council as a part of the first phase of the Overlay District on March 27, 2007. 8 Transportation Staff previously identified the minimum acceptable transportation improvements that would have to be completed prior to the opening the retail uses within the Northern Tract. They were approved by City Council as a part of the first phase of the Overlay District on March 27, 2007. U. S. 380 and Bonnie Brae will have to be improved to accommodate the overall Rayzor Ranch development. The U.S. 380 improvement project will create a minimum of six lanes (three in each direction), double left turn lanes at the major entrances and two new signal lights. Staff is continuing to work with the applicant to make sure that adequate improvements are in place along U.S. 380 prior to the opening of the commercial phase of development within the Southern tract. The proposed right turn lane from northbound Bonnie Brae to eastbound U.S. 380 has become a critical component to several related parts of the Rayzor Ranch project. Resolution of the ~eometr_y of this turn lane is holding up the City's ability to make decisions and final comments re~ardin~ the proposed Bonnie Brae width which in turn affects staff s ability to make decisions on the final intersection configuration of U.S. 380 and Bonnie Brae, a proposed North-South City water line project, relocation of several large DME transmission poles and the final location of the DME substation. Staff has been working with the applicant to resolve this critical transportation component. Drama e The topography of most of the Northern Tract and part of the Southern Tract forces water to drain from the north and west to the south and east until in ends up in a pipe under Bonnie Brae and flows into North Lakes pond (See Exhibit 14). As mentioned previously above, drainage and water quality requirements were approved by City Council as a part of the first phase of the Overlay District on March 27, 2007. These requirements are designed to ensure that flow of storm water can be controlled by the existing pond and dam in North Lakes Park as well as to control the amount of pollutants that will enter the pond since it is used for recreational activities. The applicant is asking to amend the Overlay District to allow building permits that are not continent on completion of certain North Lakes pond dam spillway improvements. Staff is not currently in support of this request without justification being submitted by the applicant and review/approval of the justification by En~ineerin~ staff. Residential Development The applicant has requested that staff move forward with approval of the residential use and development standards for the Southern Tract of the Overlay District. The applicant is proposing single family detached (up to 185 units), single family attached (up to 496 units), multifamily (up to 750 units) and office uses in the Southern Tract and up to 112 single family units on the Northern Tract (1,543 total units). There continue to be 9 unresolved and outstanding issues regarding the proposed single family residential areas both north and south of U. S. 3 80 which include guest parking, fire access, utility locations, shared access drives and maintenance responsibilities. As stated above, the area north of U.S. 380 will be brought forward for consideration at a later date. The applicant has stated that they are lacking sufficient residential product within the Southern Tract and need to add to this category from earlier estimates of 500 apartment units to the current request of 750 units. The applicant has stated that it is essential to have enough residential units within a walkable distance from the Southern Tract retail in order for a horizontal mixed use development to be successful. The proposed ratio of single family units to multifamily units for the entire Rayzor Ranch development (793 to 750) is 51 % to 49%. This is not consistent with the overall goal of the Denton Plan to have a ratio of 59% single family to 41 % multifamily by the year 2020 nor is it consistent with the new City policy that the overall ratio of single family to multifamily be 70% to 30%. Because the development is part of a mixed use project, however, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission are willing to support this request with conditions. Planning and Zoning Commission agreed with staff's recommendation that provisions similar to that of Section 35.5.9 of the Denton Development Code be clearly stated as being a part of this Overlay District to ensure that a true mixed use development take place on the subject property. This section of the DDC reads as follows: A. All multi-family proposed as part of a Mixed Use Development in the NRMU-12, NRMU, CM-G, CM-E, RCR-l, RCR-2, RCC-N and RCC-D zoning districts shall: 1. Be subject to a development agreement (the "Development Agreement") between the property owner and the City which shall be entered into prior to final plat approval for any portion of the development. The Development Agreement shall contain Assurances, other covenants, and a Phasing Plan stipulating that non-residential development will be constructed first and multi-family residential constructed last or only after 50% or more of the non- residential component has been developed. The Development Agreement shall be in recordable form and be recorded in the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas and shall constitute covenants running with the land and will be binding on all owners and future owners of the property. Phasing Plan is defined as a graphic and narrative document that indicates the sequence and/or timing of construction and shall provide a description of the phasing order (l, 2, 3,) or by time period (2005, 2006, 2007,) and includes infrastructure requirements for each phase. 2. If a phased project proposes all or a majority of the common amenities for future phases, (including, but not limited to, open space, landscaping and/or recreational facilities) then "Assurances" are required. The Assurances will address amenities not constructed in the early phases so that in the event that the future phases are not developed, sufficient common amenities will be provided for the phases actually developed. The Assurances will be a cash amount equal to the estimated cost to develop the amenities as determined by the applicant's professionals and sealed by an architect or engineer. The Assurances will be in the form of a cash deposit with the City or other form of l0 security approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager. The city will use the security to construct the amenities if the developer fails to perform in accordance with the "Assurances". 3. Before building permits may be issued for any portion of the project, a preliminary site plan for the entire project must be approved. Diversification of ownership will not be considered a valid basis or justification for a variance or an amendment to a previously approved site plan. Gas Well Development A total of four gas well development sites are being proposed within the boundaries of Rayzor Ranch, each of which is approximately two acres in size. All of the proposed pad sites are located adjacent to either existing (outside of Rayzor Ranch) or proposed residential uses. The proposed pad sites are currently located within zoning districts that require the gas well operators to obtain both plat approval through the Development review Committee and an SUP by City Council prior to permits being issued. Staff is recommending that the plat and SUP requirements remain intact within the Overlay District. Denton Municipal Electric The total amount of development being proposed within Rayzor Ranch will trigger the need for an additional Denton Municipal Electric (DME) substation. DME has been working with the applicant to secure a two acre substation site immediately south of the Albertson's grocery store on Bonnie Brae. The three big box retail stores proposed within the RR-3 subarea (approved on 3.27.07) will have adequate power prior to the substation being built. The final location of the DME substation has not been resolved and has become another critical component to the overall timing of this rp oject• Q NA I, Y,S'I,S'~ Comprehensive Plan Analysis: On May 15, 2007, the City Council approved and completed the applicant's Comprehensive Plan amendment request. The subject property is now located within a combination of Regional Mixed Use Centers and Neighborhood Centers future land use designations. According to the Denton Plan, the description of a "Regional Mixed Use Centers" designation reads as follows: "For a regional activity center, the focus area contains the shopping, services, recreation, employment, and institutional facilities supported by and serving an entire region. A regional activity center could include a regional shopping mall, a number of major employers, restaurant and entertainment facilities, a large high school or community college, and high-density housing. A regional activity center is considerably larger and more diverse in its land uses than any other activity center. It includes 11 vertically integrated uses where different uses may occur on each floor of the building. height & mass. " The Regional Mixed Use Centers land use designation was designed to allow uses such as shopping services and recreation that support the entire region. The location of the property at the southeast corner of I-3 5 and U. S. Highway 3 8o is regional in nature and consumers can easily access the site without overburdening the surrounding area. The current commercial and retail uses within the nearby area and the location of an adjacent major transportation intersection qualify this area as a regional activity center, which is serving the community at a larger scale. The proposed development is consistent with the Regional Mixed Use center land use designation is consistent with The Denton Plan land use goals and principles. According to the Denton Plan, the description of a "Neighborhood Centers" designation reads as follows: "Within the undeveloped urban and urbanizing areas of the city, new neighborhoods may develop in traditional patterns. Mixed-use and mixed housing types will be allowed to develop in a pattern of "neighborhood centers ". These are oriented inwardly, focusing on the center of the neighborhood. These neighborhoods will exemplify the interrelationship between quality of development, density, services and provision for adequate facilities. These developments should locate the center of the neighborhood within a five to ten minute walking distance from the edge of the neighborhood. The center contains uses necessary to support the suNrounding neighborhood. These suppoNt uses could include seNVice- oriented retail such as a small grocery, hair salon, dry cleaner or small professional offices. Residential uses may occuN at higher densities with town homes or residential flats above service oriented uses. Open space occurs in neighboNhood centers with park uses including centNal neighborhood "gr'eens " and floodplain preservation. Civic uses such as fire stations, schools, libNaries, and mass tNansportation nodes aNe encouraged to be essential elements of neighborhood centers as landmarks that are a focus to the neighborhood. Limited multistory development in the neighboNhood may be developed to incorpoNate shops on the ground floor and offices or residences on the upper floors. " The Neighborhood Centers land use designation already exists on the subject property and it will continue to serve as a buffer between the "Regional Mixed Use Center" category and the neighborhood that is located east of the site. Development Code/Zoning Analysis: In addition to the General Issue commentary above staff has the following comments: The City Council has already approved the following uses and subareas (See Exhibits 5 and 8). The RR- l , 2 and 3 subareas will contain the commercial development. The P subareas will be limited to open space, parks, landscaping, the water quality feature on the Northern Tract and possibly two museums and an outdoor entertainment facility on 12 the Southern Tract. The Hotel/RR subareas will contain he two proposed hotels and/or additional commercial uses. The CC subareas contain the proposed continuing care facility. The SF-2 subarea along the west side of the P subareas in the Southern Tract will contain townhomes. The proposed zoning under consideration at this time is an expansion of the modified (via the Special Purpose Overlay District) Regional Center Commercial Downtown (RCC-D) and a new Neighborhood Residential Mixed Use (NRMU) zoning district (See Exhibit 9). The areas under consideration with this request are labeled BH/MF for multifamily and "Big House" development (Big House is a group of townhomes within one structure that is made to appear like one large house), SF-2 areas which will consist of detached and attached single family, 0 subareas which will contain office uses and the remainder of the CC continuing care area which is also being included with this request (See Exhibit 17). DEPARTMENT AND AGENCYREVIEW: The Development Review Committee has reviewed this request and continues to provide direction to the applicant so that transportation, drainage, architectural guidelines and parking do not negatively impact the use of surrounding properties. FIN~INC~.S': Pursuant to subsection 35.3.4.B. of the Denton Development Code, a zoning amendment shall be approved only when the following criteria are met: 1. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Future Land Use element of The Denton Plan. The Regional Mixed Use and Neighborhood Centers future land use categories are appropNiate to support the zoning change being pNOposed by the applicant. 2. The proposed rezoning facilitates the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewers, parks, other public requirements and public convenience. Adequate pNOVisions of transpoNtation, water, seweNS, parks, other public requirements and public convenience will exist and shall be improved as a part of this development to offset the impacts it generates. The portion of the request that staff supports is consistent with the requirements of the Denton Development Code and the standards set forth within the Denton Plan. 13 EXHIBIT 2 14 Aerial Overview of Entire Subject Property EXHIBIT 3 Aerial of Northern Tract 15 EXHIBIT 4 16 Site Plan of Northern Tract EXHIBIT 5 Existing Northern Tract Zoning 17 EXHIBIT 6 Aerial of Southern Tract 18 EXHIBIT 7 Site Plan of Southern Tract _: ~- 1'11 T! ~ ,...~ ,,::.... ............... ~#f ,a l ~~_ . .~ i A <, t ~r ~~ t 4 1' E F ~!<a~ 1 1 .i ` k E ~ l .: ~~. b.... p, p,: $~ ~~~ ~' ~ ` '~~~ EXHIBIT 8 Existing Southern Tract Zoning 20 EXHIBIT 9 Proposed Southern Tract Zoning 21 EXHIBIT 10 Notification Map Public Notification Date: November 18, 2007 200' Legal Notices* sent via Certified Mail: 119 Number of responses to 200' Legal Notice: ^ In Opposition: 2 ^ In Favor: 6 ^ Neutral: 0 * - A copy of the not cation list is available at City Hall West, 221 N. Elm Street, Denton, TX EXHIBIT 11 Public Notification Responses ~ ~ ~ ~ ~d .~ ~ rat ~ ~~ __. . 4. ~~ ~.~ ~ ,. ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ., ~ 1 1 1 1 ~~, -; 23 ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~~~ . r ~ ~ ~~ ~•~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ { ~~ . ~ ~ • . ~•' Y~ ~ _ ~• ~ ~ ~~~~~ 1 • r • ~ rti r r ~ ~ t ti • .r , 24 r~u "~'l~ ~i~ ~ ~ t~ ~ rr~s ~n art gad m ~~ ~~ • ~ ~r a~ ~ ~ a~ ~r~ L1~1 i ~~~ ~~~~ i ~ y ~~rl$ I~UI~U~IQ4, ~ ~+ 1 ' ~ +'i i~r.~~r~''r:-rirY •r~~tt _: _sSi-sr•~~~-.stir-r. 1 a«}.-rtrnrr~-~. :~_r • Phl~l Addy ~f fit: - 1~~'1~1 ~~~ ~ r 1 • ..r 1 4 ~ ~ ~~r}. ~r .z. L i, 1 1 .. r~ ~1. 4.•.I.~r.,..ly..r L ' ,5~~ •'1 .JI,y•,, ••r }.rY'iV , • •1'yV,1 .1. .1 •1 r I. .' •Jr {•, f. 15. '~ 5V I .~1 ~ 1 1 1 v .f: ir: .~ iti •.r spa 1. .1.-i - ~ .. .:. ..1,1 ~rvti .1 .1 ~•'~ ~4~• T}'1•'"Ja ~r:til }?~ rl.~~• ._ 1~: }~1,',''~ {' ~ r~l• .i~ 1~' '~ -0t.a~i : 'r~, .• , ~ z.lti~ ±1.•i.•, 1~• X11:• ~?r •~1' 1 . r •1 -1. Ilr'~5titiR 4;' .5 '~'~ti~ '1•• .~ 1. t 'r{ • ,~~ ' .l ^'~• ;~•1~_-~; r ;+ rrl ~ ter' i ' • '• ~ rr~ .•l• I. r ~. Y '1 V ••~ 1 1-~:r~. •_µ1Q.11 {'i~ ~+ f 5. ~•~1 1~ ~' 1r !r~~ ~ ' =~•A~i`~ra,R:• ''!!~'~iti :.f .A ky,'1til~Fi r_}~ i~ ¢ ~~•.: IL. { f rti V .1 ..I. 1. fY•:' ~'~~rS.IY•:~'r. ix•1~1 2 r 1: ; 'a,;r~ilt.: ~'- •r: 1: ~ •,~ lti~ ~,* ~ {I' Iyrr'l•_~I~7i .L 11 •.1~~'rri~f.r 1 1 1 {Ir • L. ~..~r-rj~ j~'.• .r •J¢'. •r~r'r'~ .. a, ,r_ ~~ sssPPP Y - n;C 1 ti~•J1 1 _ ~.f~I ~~' 411. {~~rr-~'`I{' •'+~~,~;', "1 I~ ~yrr~~ 1~.,.~ S ~~~~ ,~, ~~ 1 ~~~~~ X11 ~~IIr 7~i'S~1 * J.1~ !~ rl~lrl i 5~'lu3~Y,~ ~ ..TYI.++u~ I 25 ^~d ~ pt ~f 1 #h~ aup~p~rt ~~ a r-L ~~ ~~ --~ ~ t~~nr ~ ail ~ ~qu~~ ~ to u~t ir-~ F L ~nr~ N~R~ ~ ~ ~ I~.~ f41~i1~~ ~~r~ ~ ~ ~~ .{ ~• ~._ ._- ~~ .tip-- •~L._1'~ 1~ _ ,5~ i VrL~ -~`. • .ti• • •'I'.Z 1. ' S: Ti f~ :f•- 'tip 1~ ~.ti ~ 5 ..~' y'~~~! .' ,~. r . Y.~fr•:Y Ta~'I. r. ,'kr•f. rr r~, n 1• • 1 r'S Itik•.n .s r. •. ' •rx 'i yy•r:l. fill 1. 1~~1 .i~~Li-•~'.1. ,'i-r~l ~. '- .• {_ I~t :•7• •.• •ti~ -'r• {•~ •rr1 `~5 r. . ~ y. 1 ti •:^ Y.1'.,u, i S:.~Ir;Cti r.'~ti'1 h-n~s•rV ;'~ V~~ --~.r,~-~7"=r... ' Li~r. *?sr, F~~ • iLllrl•• ' tiL~~-~r T; ••. urn.. ''1 L'~ ~ ~T r•.. I f-: •~•~..:.r~ ' ~" v+L. ~ r+:l•r,,,•. •lvll'v 7~i•••ti .~...-.1 .. ..I ;~: }L ~ •~r5••} ,I. R Ga. • 1. 111 ~. . tir. { }.• '1• Ilrt ~1 .. v•,~-L fvi ~~21h'~y i tti-3.rfy•r i i i ~rdS~'~L,rir ~ ~iGr Ki fi - • } , } ti}.~ . r •~•: .~ . • Y~}'~.•i •~ •1 i{- ~1;5: a~_4~l{._ tit ~- .5;1 r - ~rlf •IL~~•. ~=~•a ~a ~5V•, ~ ;Sr ~ •~~,rV•ti. . , ''~,{y _ }~?Z$ •: 5:.i Iti .f ~~wv '~_.••Yr •~ . ~Tr • ~ 7 ' 1=~.' Iti •~,g~L~{•-~'2=ti~r.k~ r ~!~ ^,~p .Y i r - r •• ~ ,,.. 1 `~ti•~~~r •, .alrF ~~• 1511:: -~F~' CI~11 11ri~ ~ ~~~! *~ ~ ~iSl.ir 1TD~1 i l~.M1.~7~ 144iUr1 ~ #`11R~1 ~ ~ .7~F~. ~1+~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~r~R.l~.Rf~7i~ 26 T forme ~~ ~ ~ ~ p~nc ~ ~~ #,~~t ~~ ~ v~ r~ge~at. 'Thy i~~ ~ ~ ~#'th~ ~ ~~ in t eu~ ~ i~i~ Ply ~ae~ ~ ~~ ~f ~qu N~a~1 ~ ~qr~t ~ #~ r ill ~~I; ~~1 R! ~~• T~ Il~l~lli~~ ~drd ~ - ~~~ T~I~h~ N ~ ~~ r - ~ IM1~~IT~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 27 T f~urm~ ate u.~d ~ ~l~,e ~ 1~ ~~ aupp~r~ ~ra~d ~pa~~ the ~q~ Tl~ i~i~ ~ mid of the ~ of r~ ~ ~p~tt ~d ~ app~i Fl~~ In ~v~ar ~~ N~u~1 ~ ~qa~t #~ ~~ s n I~r~bad N~m~: I~I~ilir~ Idr ~-~iR: Phil ,~df ~ ~I In ft~ - - - ~I~TIE171~~1 '~~~~~ ~ CITY ~~ ~~T • * TES 'mil ' 34~~+1] + ~, F ~~ 2g . .5 ti ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ - ~~ .. ~ ~ 29 _ ~ r. ~. ~, ~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .. . ~~ ~ ~ _ L , ~~- - ^ ~ ^ ^~^ _.. ^ ~ S ^ ^ i ^ ~L ~ ti J ~; J ~.... ~ ~ ~.- 1 ~ .+ ~ .. r- E .~ ~~ .~ i' ~~ ~.~ ., ~~ .~~ ~~fr~ ~ t ~ ~~ + ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ , . f 30 EXHIBIT 12 Tree Mitigation Plan _ ri L !R : ~a'` E ~~y\ .a ~. r ~ ~~'~. rAM wMw "'~ • ~I~IIIIIIIII `, ~.IM ~.: ~' G A ~. »... !t ~ S ~ : ~ i k. ;: '. ~; `> ~ ~ ~ "i ~ + ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~• ~ '1 ~ i • t I ~ • :1 1: ~, ~~ E S ~g 1~' '~lll~ T i~ 1 ~r 31 EXHIBIT 13 Retail Architectural Guidelines ~~ 32 33 34 EXHIBIT 14 71 • T 1 •7 •i QRAINS TO NORTH LAKES PART( {SOUTH I~~~a} N W~E S GRAPIHIC SCALE 4 300 B00 1200 { IN FEET ) 5cole; A5 5H4YVN aeelgned hy. 141A RAY2~ R RANCH ~~~ IGmI~Horn aF~n by KHA DRAINAGE AREAS I.H. 35 & UNIVERSITY DRIVE ~ 5~~~ ~IIC. Checked dy. IWA EXHIBIT Dote: D ENT N, TEX-4S ,~ ~ ~n~ ~.. ,~,~ ~. ~•.~-+~~ pr41eCt FAO. ~~ ~ eoIIR T~~ 7551 Fm Nu Al~ae7e 35 ~raina~e ~xnil~i~ EXHIBIT 15 Approved Conceptual Zoning Plan for Northern Tract 36 EXHIBIT 16 Approved Conceptual Zoning Plan for Southern Tract 37 EXHIBIT 17 Proposed Conceptual Zoning Plan for Southern Tract 38 EXHIBIT 18 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -November 28, 2007 ,.~ .~ _ R x. ~ . _ ~. :~ .~r~ .~~. ~ : ;~~ ~~ ~~ . ~ ~, : u s E E, .. , w ~ g ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~E ~ ~ ~~~ : ~~ + f .. > ~~~ R ~. r 7 ~ Jc _ ~~~ x E i M ~' . _ ~ •. ~ ~k ~ ,. r ~ .Y"~ «~ r i ~, / ~~ 4 ~ ~ ~ g ~: . . ~y1 ~ ~~ -• ., . 5 .. ~ :: ., -r y~-. ..a .. ._.. .. - t ~ t K ~,~ ~ ~ „~ t YJ N y ~~` E ,~ - ~ ,~~ L ... _, ~, '.~~ •i. #. ,; ' ` ~ ~ r - ' ~ ~ ~ ~, 11l~/ ~ i ~~ ~,, ,. . .. ~~ '~ Y M 3 .,. .,:.- :~ .. -...:. ... `~ ~ ~~ ~ .~: 'P. .... y Y ~ ~ 3, S ~ 1~ I~ ~ ~~ ~~~. 1U SSd~~~"' k {_ G h ~' ~~ ~ t ~ Ih i i q r ~ 4 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ [ y 1i3 ~~ ~ ~ `~`^i.~ v~ .~~ yti Y `~ - :~. .. .. ~. ~ ~ 111 .. ~. w ~' r f~ ~ ~ t ~ u ~ ~x~ f s. ~~` A. r ~y~ w:: ~A~ARk y > ~~ :~` ~~ ., ... ~ .. .. .. .... ~ ~~~~ . ~ ~ ~E x: E ' ~ } ~' .. ... .. r .,. - .. ~~. i, ..~ t:- ~~~ r _'` ~ i, ??yy~~, ~' n~ ~. s ~: ,, ... ,: ~ t: { E ~~ _, , e ~~ d a ~ ' is ,. ~ -~ ~ .;~:~~.~~i~" '~' ~ i.: ys a ,.. ~ ~~ elf..' ~~' ` . _ r.. ~ f ._. .''~ sR ';. ~:~:: ; i~. ~ i' :iw ~~~ ~ :r 4 w Y • ' '. ~~ '~" ~.' 39 ..., ~` ~. . . ~.'~ ~tl~ r _ , ~ f k ~. 3 } y"~. R.. Rk d ;~. -: .,, . . .. .. ~ '~ z ' , : .. ~ 'iJ,~, 1 { ,~ . : . f R R, ~f . ~~. R»~ 1. i:. n~ i~ ~' ~ ] ._ - .. f ' • Y .. r.. .; ... ... .. ~ .~: '<: ~ . ~ `'.. Y''. ~~~ ~'~ ~~~ _.~ .. _.re x~a ,: ' !,. ~' -r r• t h:.. •i y~. ' ~~' ~ ~f. 1 :4j F ~ 1~-. ;~•. ~~ ~1:. • A`. 1H ri ;~n ,y;, .- .. .: ~ .~. 9+ ~~ i ~a ~:7 j ~~~ j: yip, ~ .. 1 ~' ~' ~~ ~::`~.' ~. :~: ,. ~~~. '.I f .... ...: ~~ e'~~ " xr": .. 1. ~ .... - ..... ~ r~. .~ ~k '!~' ~ J.~ :~ r ~ x ? M~ ~ ~ `~ ~ Est i ~ : ff; ~~- ~ ;~• 1 ~ ~~ :if' ~ ~k~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ~r ~~ ~~~r .~ ~ pi ; . ,~sE .~ 4 .:k: -~~'. i.' h ~. ~; ~~ `y S1~ . k ,F~ . e~ .! ~ _. i~ z i :~ R %~. ~~ ~' ~~ ~I ~~ ~~:~. ;~~ ~i ~~ ~~ ~:: ~ ~ ix ~~~ ~~: ~~ ~:~~ ~ • l~ ~~ .... ~' ~ ;:i _ a ~ • - e ~: k d` s .. ~< 40 EXHIBIT 19 ORDINANCE N0.2008- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REZONING APPROXIMATELY 87 ACRES OF LAND LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO, FROM THE EXISTING NR-6 AND NRMU ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS AND USE DESIGNATIONS TO THE NRMU AND RCC-D ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE TERMS OF THE RAYZOR RANCH OVERLAY DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION HEREIN AMENDED; AMENDING BY SUPERSEDURE CHAPTER 35, SUBCHAPTER 7.13 OF THE CITY OF DENTON CODE OF ORDINANCES, "DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE", "SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS"; PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE RAYZOR RANCH OVERLAY DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the property owner initiated the rezoning process for that 87 acre tract of land legally described by metes and bounds in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, and depicted as "SF-2, CC, 0, MF AND BH/MF", within Exhibit K, (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the owner of the Property requested that the Property be considered for rezoning from NR-6 AND NRMU zoning districts to the NRMU AND RCC-D zoning district, as modified by the "Rayzor Ranch Overlay District" previously defined, and amended herein; and WHEREAS, the owner of the Property supports the rezoning of the Property; and WHEREAS, Sections 35.7.1, 35.7.2, and 35.7.3 of the Denton Development Code authorize the City Council to approve overlay districts to protect and enhance certain specific lands and structures which, by virtue of their type or location, have characteristics which are distinct from lands and structures outside such special districts and contain such reasonable and necessary requirements to insure the protection and enhancement of said land and structures. Further, the overlay districts are authorized to establish specific design standards and development regulations to effectuate the purpose of the district; and WHEREAS, on November 28, 2007, the Planning and Zoning Commission, conducted a public hearing, and having found that all prerequisite requirements had been satisfied, recommended approval of the requested zoning and code amendment; and WHEREAS, on January 8, 2008, the City Council held a public hearing as required by law and approved the change in zoning from the NR-6 and NRMU zoning districts to the NRMU and RCC-D Zoning Classification and Use Designations, as modified by the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District, as amended herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that establishing the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District serves a public purpose; and 41 WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings: A. The change in zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and B. The Rayzor Ranch Overlay District will protect and enhance the Property, which is distinct from the lands and structures outside of the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District, including the immediate neighborhood NOVV THEREFORE; THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: The findings and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are incorporated herein by reference, Chapter 35, Subchapter 7 "Denton Development Code", "Special Purpose and Overlay Districts", Code of Ordinances, City of Denton Texas is hereby amended by supersedure of Section 35.7.13. Rayzor Ranch Overlay District, to read as follows: 35.7.13.0 Rayzor Ranch Overlay District. The Rayzor Ranch Overlay District classification is hereby defined with respect to approximately 410 acres of land, legally described in Exhibit "A" to Ordinance 2007- 110. 35.7.13.1 Purpose. The purpose of establishing the Rayzor Ranch Marketplace Overlay District is to: Ensure compatibility of new construction with the existing scale and characteristics of surrounding properties; and Protect and enhance specific land features which have characteristics distinct from lands and structures outside this Special Purpose District; and Provide within the Rayzor Ranch area a combination of land uses arranged and designed in accordance with sound site planning principles and development techniques; and in such a manner as to be properly related to each other, the immediate surrounding area, the planned mobility system, and other public facilities such as water and sewer systems, parks, schools and utilities; and Encourage a more creative approach in the utilization of land in order to accomplish an efficient, aesthetic, and desirable development which may be characterized by special features of the geography, topography, size or shape of a particular property and to accomplish a more economical and efficient use of land. 35.7.13.2 Subareas. This district shall be divided into two major divisions, separated generally by US 3 80 (University Drive) -the Marketplace and the Town Center. A. Marketplace. The Marketplace shall be divided into two subareas, 42 1. Subareas 1 and 2 of the Marketplace are generally depicted in Exhibit K B. Town Center. The Town Center shall be divided into two subareas. 1. Subareas 1 and 2 of the Town Center are generally depicted in Exhibit K C. Part or all of the Subareas maybe developed in phases 35.7.13.3 Application of Regulations. A. General. The following definitions shall apply to the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District: Continuing Care Retirement Center. A facility that integrates multiple senior living options into one facility including skilled nursing, assisted living, dementia care, as well as independent living. This use is not considered a multifamily dwelling unit. (Ordinance No.2007-110) Plaza or Public Area Space: An area identified on a plan filed at the City which is designated for public or civic use. The designated area shall be maintained by a property/home owner association. (Ordinance No. 2007-110). Rayzor Ranch: The comprehensive development which includes all phases defined within the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District (Ordinance No.2007-068). Bid House: A type of residential development where 10 or fewer dwelling units are located in a single building which is intended to resemble a single large house. Gas well development is permitted within this district subject to the requirements of the Denton Development Code. All has well development will require Council approval of a Specific Use Permit prior to issuance of a permit for drilling. [Subsection 35.7.13.3.A.5, below, may be deleted from the Code text by Staff upon satisfaction of all conditions, without necessity of further Council action] 5. In addition to other permits and requirements which must be obtained or satisfied prior to construction of any improvements, no building permit of any type, certificate of occupancy, or any other permit allowing construction of improvements may be issued 43 (other than a clearing and grading permit), and no construction may take place within the first phase, until: a. A development agreement is executed, filed and recorded, providing for the escrow of $215,000 in funds for mitigation of trees removed without a permit, and committing $250,000 in park improvements to offset drainage impacts at North Lakes Park (see Exhibit M). This requirement supplements, but does not supersede, satisfy, or replace any other permits or requirements of construction. It is understood that the Developer will submit and the city will review Plats and Engineering Documents, prior to condition (a) above being met; with the goal of obtaining a mass grading permit for the second phase, and construction permits for certain temporary roadway improvements within the second phase. Condition (a) above is a condition for plat approval, but may be satisfied after plat approval. 35.7.13.4 Marketplace -Subarea 1 Development Standards (SF-1). [TO BE INCORPORATED LATER] 35.7.13.5 Marketplace -Subarea 2 Development Standards (RR-3, P, and RR- In Subarea 2, the City rules and regulations applicable to the development of property located within a RCC-D zoning district are applicable with the following additional restrictions: Permitted Uses. The only permitted uses are as shown on the attached Master Zoning Site Plan (See Exhibit L). Generally, these uses must be located within the Subareas as shown on the Master Conceptual Zoning Plan (Exhibit K) as follows: RR-3: wholesale sales; retail construction materials sales with a minimum floor area of 100,000 square feet; quick vehicle servicing; garden center with container plant materials and associated garden supplies only accessory to retail or a home improvement center in excess of 100,000 square feet, retail sales and services, restaurants, parks and open space and professional services and offices. All other uses are prohibited. RR-2: retail sales and services, restaurants, drive-through facilities indoor recreation, parks and open space and professional services and offices. All other uses are prohibited. P: parks and open space, water quality feature as defined in this ordinance. All other uses are prohibited. 44 All parks and open space not dedicated to and accepted by the City shall be owned and maintained by a private Property Owners Association, established and approved at the time of platting. 35.7.13.6 Town Center -General Use and Development Standards. In the Town Center (Subareas 1 and 2) the following general City rules and regulations are applicable to the development of property located within a RCC-D zoning district are applicable with the following additional restrictions: Minimum Yard Abutting a Sin.le-Family Use or District. The minimum yard when abutting asingle-family use or district shall be ten feet (lo') plus one foot (1') for each foot of building height above twenty feet (20' ). Maximum FAR and Dwellin.~ Units. The maximum FAR shall be 4.0. A maximum of 185 single family detached dwelling units, 496 single family attached dwelling units and 750 multifamily dwelling units are permitted subject to Section C below.. Mixed Use and Multifamily Restrictions: In any liven phase, the multi-family residential construction in this subarea may not be permitted or constructed until 50% or more of the non-residential component has been completed, inspected and approved. If a bhased broiect broboses all or a maiority of the common amenities for future phases, (including, but not limited to, open space, landscaping and/or recreational facilities), a phasing plan shall be considered as a component of the final plat, and shall provide for a deposit to secure construction of common amenities in future phases. Such security may take the form of a cash deposit held by the City, or other form of security approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager, in an amount not less than the estimated cost to develop the amenities as determined by the applicant's professionals and sealed by an architect or engineer, and may be used by City to construct the amenities if the developer fails to perform in accordance with the "Assurances". Phasing Plan is defined as a graphic and narrative document that indicates the sequence and/or timing of construction and shall provide a description of the phasing order (1, 2, 3,) or by time period (2005, 2006, 2007,) and includes infrastructure requirements for each phase. Before building permits may be issued for any portion of the project, a preliminary site plan for the entire project must be 45 approved. Diversification of ownership will not be considered a valid basis or _~ustification for a variance or an amendment to a previously approved site plan. Maximum Building Heights. Except as noted, the maximum building height shall be one hundred feet 100' . The maximum building height for hotel and/or office uses shall be 816 feet above mean sea level for areas labeled hotel/RR as shown on Exhibit "K", except for the area labeled HoteIIRR which abuts IH-35 which shall have a maximum height of 792 feet above mean sea level. Parks and Open Space. All parks and open space not dedicated to and accepted by the City shall be owned and maintained by a private Property Owners Association, established and approved at the time of platting. 35.7.13.7 Town Center -Subarea 1 Use and Development Standards (RR-1. RR-2, SF-2, MF, P, 0, and Hotel/RR). In Town Center Subarea 1, the City rules and regulations applicable to the development of property located within a RCC-D zoning district are applicable, except as otherwise provided by this Overlay District and further restricted or excepted as follows: Permitted Uses. The only permitted uses are as shown on the attached Master Zoning Site Plan (See Exhibit L): 1. RR-2: retail sales and services, restaurants, drive-through facilities, indoor recreation, parks and open space and professional services and offices. All other uses are prohibited. 2. RR-l: retail sales and services, commercial parking lots, movie theaters, restaurants, drive-through facilities, indoor recreation, outdoor recreation, parks and open space and professional services and offices. All other uses are prohibited. 3. Hotel/RR: retail sales and services, commercial parking lots, hotels, restaurants, parks and open space and professional services and offices. All other uses are prohibited. 4. MF: multifamily and parks and open space. All other uses are prohibited. 5. SF-2: attached single family dwellings, parks and open space. All other uses are prohibited. 46 6. P: parks and open space, community service (limited to museums with educational facilities), major event entertainment (by SUP only). All other uses are prohibited. 35.7.13.8 Town Center -Subarea 2 Use and Development Standards (SF-2, BH/MF, and CC). In Subarea 2, the City rules and regulations applicable to the development of property located within a NRMU zoning district are applicable except as otherwise provided in this Overlay District and further restricted or excepted as follows: Permitted Uses. The only permitted uses are as shown on the attached Master Zoning Site Plan (See Exhibit L): 1. SF-2: attached and detached single family dwellings, parks and open space and basic utilities (specifically an electrical substation). All other uses are prohibited. 2. BH/MF: multifamily, big house, parks and open space. All other uses are prohibited. 3. CC: elderly housing (all categories), continuing care retirement center, parks and open space. All other uses are prohibited. 35.7.13.9 Rayzor Ranch Site Design Standards. In this overlay district, the City rules and regulations regarding site design standards, Subchapter 13, and the Site Design Criteria Manual shall apply, except for the following additional restrictions and exceptions: Landscaping and Tree Miti a.~ tion -Landscaping and Tree Mitigation must additionally meet the standards set forth in Exhibit "C".(will make sure correct Exhibit C is attached this time.) 1. Section 1.02(bl Subarea 2 Buffers and Screening "Existin Commercial Development Buffer (West)" is amended as follows: The Existing Commercial Development Buffer shall consist of a masonry wall as described in Exhibit D and landscape buffer. In addition to the masonry wall, a 10' landscape buffer (commercial side) will include a minimum of one (1) tree for every 30 linear feet and 10 shrubs (see Approved Plant List -Appendix C), minimum 5 gallons, for every 30 linear feet. The buffer shall have a minimum of 3 tree species with no more than 40% of each tree being used within th a h» ffer_ 2. The installation of the required buffer landscaping along Bonnie Brae Street may be delayed until after construction of the proposed DME substation and the proposed North-South 36" City waterline adjacent to this District. Architecture -Architecture must meet the standards set forth in Exhibit "D". 47 [ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE FOR THIS EXHIBIT TO BE INCORPORATED LATER] 35.7.13.10 Parking Standards. In this district, the City rules and regulations regarding parking standards, Subchapter 14, are applicable with the following exceptions: Maximum Allowable Number of Parking Spaces. Section 35.14.4.F shall not apply. 35.7.13.11 Drainage. General In this overlay district, the drainage improvements shall be designed in accordance with the requirements provided in the Denton Development Code Section 35.19 and the Drainage Criteria Manual. Areas within the RR-3 Area that do not drain into North Lakes Park Property are not subject to the Development Restrictions in Section 35.7.13.9.B. Storm Water Drainage into North Lakes Park (Drainage Areas A 1 and B 1) Drainage Areas Al and B1 depicted on Exhibit "E", Drainage Areas Exhibit, consist of approximately 225-acres of land that drains into the South Pond at North Lakes Park formally known as Hickory Creek -Site 16 (Pond 16). This Pond is regulated under Texas Administrative Code Title 30 Part 1 Chapter 299 Dams and Reservoirs, and is classified as an intermediate size high hazard impoundment in Section 299.14 of these regulations. High hazard impoundments are required to pass the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) without overtopping of the dam embankment, or failure of the outlet works, or emergency auxiliary spillway. Exempt Lots: Development of lots in Drainage Areas Al and B1 are exempt from the restrictions of Subsection 35.7.13.9.B if the a~~re~ate impervious cover surface area within all the exempted lots does not exceed 10,000 square feet. Streets and sidewalks in publicly dedicated rights-of way or public access easements are not included in the a~~re~ate impervious surface area calculation. Development of lots in Drainage Areas Al and B1 that are not exempted under 35.7.13.9.B.2, above, will be restricted as follows with regard to drainage improvements until improvements to Pond 16 are constructed and accepted by the City and TCEQ to achieve compliance with Texas 48 Administrative Code Title 30 Part 1 Chapter 299 Dams and RPCPrvnirr~ Preliminary Plat approval will not be granted for any development until the City of Denton and TCEQ have approved the preliminary hydrologic and hydraulic analyses (PMF and dam breach analyses) and the preliminary engineering (PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT) to determine the extent of the embankment and spillway improvements that are required. TCEQ "approval" is defined as City receipt of written correspondence from TCEQ indicating that the methodology, assumptions, flood hydrograph calculation procedures, and design analysis methods being used to determine the extent of improvements are in accordance with TCEQ accepted methods and procedures. Final Plat approval will not be granted for any development until the City of Denton and TCEQ have approved the construction plans for the embankment and spillway improvements, the source of funds for construction is identified, and a construction schedule is committed to for the improvements. Building permits may not be granted until the construction contract for the embankment and spillway improvements is awarded to a Contractor acceptable to the TCEQ and City of Denton, and it can be reasonably determined by the City that the construction and acceptance of the Pond 16 improvements can be completed prior to the certificate of occupancy being issued for any building. All right-of ways and easements required for construction and maintenance of Pond 16, if any, must be secured and recorded prior to a Building Permit being issued by the City. Final Acceptance or Certificate of Occupancy may not be requested until the improvements to Pond 16 are constructed to achieve compliance with Texas Administrative Code Title 30 Part 1 Chapter 299 as determined by the TCEQ. Approval may not be granted for any Final Plat that does not provide for onsite storm water detention until the downstream channel and culvert improvements at Bonnie Brae Road to convey the developed peak flow 49 into Pond 16 (downstream improvements) are designed and approved by the City, and, constructed and accepted by the City, unless the downstream improvements are included as part of the development, in which case the downstream improvements plans will be included and approved during the Final Plat process Storm Water Quality All Preliminary and Final Plats will include provisions for onsite or regional storm water quality enhancement, including dedication of drainage easement areas as necessary to construct the storm water quality structural controls and management practices as described in Exhibit "F". The storm water quality controls shall be constructed as a part of the storm drainage improvements for the development. Approval will not be granted by the City for any Preliminary or Final Plat that will rely on downstream or regional storm water quality controls until the downstream improvements to serve the development are designed and approved by the City, and, constructed and accepted by the City, unless the downstream improvements are included as part of the platted development. Engineering inspection fees will be paid to the City for the inspection of all storm water quality controls during construction. Designer certifications that the storm water quality controls and management practices were constructed in accordance with the approved plans will be provided to the City upon request. Exception -First Phase (RR-3 Subarea) Final Plat that provides onsite detention is not prohibited by these drainage requirements or restrictions if the City approves an analysis showing the onsite detention pond is sized to capture the excess runoff volume from the development resulting from the PMF and provide extended detention of sufficient duration to prevent a rise in the North Lakes Pond maximum water surface elevation during the PMF. The Developer's Engineer shall certify that the analysis shows there will be no rise 50 in the water level and no adverse impacts to Pond 16 prior to granting approval. No Building Permit for any development in the RR-3 Subarea may be granted until the City and TCEQ have approved the construction plans for the Pond 16 embankment and spillway improvements, the source of funds for construction is identified, a construction schedule is committed to for the improvements, all rights-of-way and easements required for construction and maintenance of Pond 16, if any, are secured and recorded prior to issuance and other applicable requirements for issuance have been satisfied. Alternatively, a Building Permit is not prohibited by these additional drainage restrictions, provided that an onsite detention pond meeting the requirements of Paragraph B.S.a. in this Section has been constructed and accepted by the City, and all other applicable requirements for issuance have been satisfied. In addition to other applicable requirements, a Final Acceptance or Certificate of Occupancy may not be granted until the construction contract for the Pond 16 embankment and spillway improvements is awarded to a Contractor acceptable to the TCEQ and City of Denton, and it can be reasonably determined by the City that the construction and acceptance of the Pond 16 improvements can be completed prior to the certificate of occupancy being issued for any building, and all other applicable requirements for issuance have been satisfied.. Final Acceptance or Certificate of Occupancy may be granted by the City if the onsite detention pond meeting the requirements of Paragraph B.S.a. in this Section has been constructed and accepted by the City, and all other applicable requirements for issuance have been satisfied. No other exceptions to the development schedule may be requested from the City until the improvements to Pond 16 are constructed to achieve compliance with Texas Administrative Code Title 30 Part 1 Chapter 299 as determined by the TCEQ. North Lakes Park Pond -Freeboard for PMF Freeboard requirements are provided in Section 3.3 of the Hydrologic and Hydraulic Guidelines for Dams in 51 Texas, TCEQ Final Draft, approved by TCEQ on August 28, 2006 (TCEQ Reference Document). Land use assumption requirements are provided in Section 5.3. No freeboard is required for the PMF for ultimate development watershed. The PMF hydrograph may be computed following the procedures in the TCEQ Reference Document or using TR-60 Earth Dams and Reservoirs, NRCS, July 2005. No freeboard is required if the TR-60 method is used. The dam breach analysis will include inundation depths and flood mapping downstream from the dam until the peak flows in Pecan Creek are attenuated to the non- breach PMF peak levels. The length of the attenuation will be as defined by Equation 8.3 from the TCEQ Reference Document. Embankment and spillway improvements designed and constructed by the developer will be based on the ultimate development conditions in the pond watershed, including the full development of the Rayzor Ranch development, per section 5.3 of the TCEQ Reference Document. An analysis of the effects of flows from the ultimate developed watershed will be provided by the developer with the dam safety analysis as set forth in Section 35.7.13.9.B.3.a. Inundation lengths will be determined per Section 8.5 of the above-mentioned TCEQ criteria. Inundation limits (width and elevation) will be determined using HEC-RAS or HEC-2 analysis method, following the procedures described in Section 8.8 of the TCEQ Reference Document. 35.7.13.12 Transportation. Required Improvements: Developer will provide a temporary easement for an east/west connection from IH-35 east to Bonnie Brae prior to issuance of any building permit (other than a clearing and ~radin~ permit) for property located in the first phase (RR-3) portion. The Developer will provide a temporary asphalt or concrete road in the approximate location of the temporary east/west connection from IH-35 frontage road, at the existing Cracker Barrel access drive, east to Bonnie Brae as shown in Exhibit 52 "G" prior to issuance of any building permit (other than a clearing and ~radin~ permit) for property located in the first phase (RR-3) portion. The Developer will provide a right-hand turn lane, on the north side of West University Drive/U.S. 380 to the northbound IH-35 service road, prior to issuance of any building permit (other than a clearing and ~radin~ permit) for property located the first phase (RR-3) portion. The Developer will provide a southbound deceleration lane, on the west side of Bonnie Brae which connects to the east/west connection between Bonnie Brae and I-35 prior to issuance of any building permit (other than a clearing and ~radin~ permit) for property located in the second phase (RR-2) portion of Marketplace. The Developer will brovide 90% Mans as defined by TXDOT for the remaining improvements to U.S. 380, as identified in the Kimley-Horn Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 29, 2007, prior to the issuance of any building permit for any property which is not located in RR-3 or the SF-1 Subareas of Marketplace. The Developer will construct a left turn lane on northbound Bonnie Brae which connects to the east/west connection between Bonnie Brae and I-35 prior to issuance of any building permit (other than a clearing and ~radin~ permit) for property located in the RR-2 Subarea of Marketplace. The required 20-foot visibility triangles are to be measured from the curb line not the property line. 35.7.13.13 Street Standards. In this overlay district, the City rules and regulations regarding street standards, Section 3 5.20.2, shall apply. Alternatively, in all street sections the standards depicted in Exhibit "J" may be utilized, if different. 35.7.13.14 Site Plans. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for residential development, a site plan must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. B. The Director of Planning may administratively approve minor modifications to an approved site plan. The Property is hereby rezoned to the NRMU and RCC-D zonin district classifications and use designation, as modified by the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District 53 classification herein defined, and the City's official zoning map is hereby amended to show the Chan e in zoning district classification. The Development Agreement attached as Exhibit M, is approved, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the document on behalf of the City, and his designee is hereby authorized to record same as a covenant running with the land leg within the Rayzor Ranch Overlay District. Any modifications necessary to effectuate its purpose and approved as to legal form by the Cit, Attorney ma, be incorporated prior to execution and recordation. Upon recordation of the executed Development Agreement, as modified, the City Manager or his designee is authorized to remove section 35.7.13.3.A.5 from the text of the Denton Development Code, without further action of the C~unci1. If any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity or the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the Cit, Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas within ten (l o) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY By: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: By: 2008. PERRY MCNEILL, MAYOR EDWIN M. SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY 54 List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Metes and Bounds Description and Depiction of Entire Special Purpose Overlay D1Strlct Exhibit B: Metes and Bounds Description and Depiction of the Approximate 87 Acre Area Exhibit C: Landscaping and Tree Mitigation Standards Exhibit D : Architectural Standards Exhibit E: Drainage Areas Exhibit Exhibit F: Water Quality Protection Plan Requirements Exhibit G: Temporary East/West Transportation Connection Exhibit H: North Lake Park Improvements Exhibit J: Alternate Street Standards Exhibit K: Master Zoning Conceptual Plan Exhibit L: Master Zoning Site Plan Exhibit M: Development Agreement for funding 55 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: Utility and CIP Engineering ACM: Howard Martin, 349-8232 ~T IR.TF,CT Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending Subchapter 16 of the Denton Development Code concerning recording of plats, construction of public improvements and building permits. (DCA06-0017, Subchapter 16) The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval on November 28, 2007 (6-0). BACKGROUND On March 27, 2007 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2007-070 modifying certain provisions of Subchapter 3 5.16 of the Denton Development Code. Specifically, prior to the adoption of this ordinance, Subchapter 35.16.6.D stated: "No building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any parcel or tract of land until such property has received final plat or development plat approval and is in conformity with the pNOVisions of these subdivision regulations, the plat has been recorded, public improvements have been accepted (if applicable), and no private improvements shall take place oN be commenced except in confoNmity with these regulations. " Although the provisions of this subchapter had been applied fairly consistently to single family developments, past policy/practice allowed exceptions for multi-family or commercial development by proceeding with building permit issuance in advance of full completion of all public improvements. In conjunction with the fact that the policy/practice did not speicifically agree with the Code, staff was given the direction to essentially "make the practice match the code or the Code match the practice." The revisions to Subchapter 35.16.6.D enacted with the adoption of ordinance No. 2007-070 are reflected in the following excerpts: D. "Single Family residential oN duplex development. No building peNmit shall be issued for any parcel or tract of land proposed for single family residential or duplex development until such propeNty has received final plat or development plat appNOVaI and is in conformity with the provisions of these subdivision regulations, the plat has been recoNded, all easements including those by separate instNUment and all applicable peNmits are in place, and all public impNOVements have been accepted (if applicable). No private improvements shall take place or be commenced except in confoNmity with these regulations. 1. Exception for model homes. Within a phase containing public improvements that have not yet been finally accepted, a developer may construct model home(s), provided that it is inspected and found to meet all building, plumbing and fiNe code requiNements pNior to being opened to obseNVation by the public, and provided further that the home will not be sold or occupied as a dwelling unit until all public impNOVements within that phase have been completed and accepted by the Ciry. E. Multi-Family oN non Nesidential development. No ceNtificate of occupancy shall be issued for any parcel or tract of land proposed for multi family or non-residential development until such propeNty has Neceived final plat or development plat appNOVaI and is in conformity with the provisions of these subdivision regulations, the plat has been recoNded, all easements including those by separate instrument and all applicable permits are in place, and all public improvements have been accepted (if applicable). No building peNmit shall be issued for any paNCel oN tNact of land proposed for multi- family or non-residential development until all public improvements have been accepted, except as pNOVided in below. 1. Upon application and satisfaction of the following conditions, the building official may issue a haNdship building permit for multi family or non-residential development, to enable limited construction prior to satisfaction of remaining development requiNements: a. The applicant must install and demonstrate proper function of fire hydrants and all-weather access improvements for fiNe apparatus required by the FiNe Code (see Chapter 28 of the Denton Code of Ordinances), b. The applicant must complete installation of all drainage and other regional improvements, paNticularly off-site impNOVements, and c. The applicant must enter into an agreement with the Ciry, in a form approved by the City AttoNney, which indemnifies and holds the City harmless for any failure of the applicant, owner or builder to obtain necessary access and drainage easements and peNmits, or to build needed offsite improvements. 2. A hardship building permit issued in this manner may be withdrawn upon failure to meet any imposed condition. 3. No certificate of occupancy may be issued to the recipient of a hardship building permit until all outstanding building permits are completed, inspected and closed; all public and private impNOVements are installed and accepted; and compliance with applicable City standards has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Building Official. 4. A hardship building permit is an optional, limited purpose permit which, upon request, allows construction of some limited component of the structuNe, not affecting ultimate compliance with Fire Code or Electrical Code (e.g., a "slab- only" permit). It does not satisfy the Nequirements of a building peNmit in any respect, nor is it a required permit for development. It is intended to address those ciNCUmstances in which the only impediment to obtaining a full building permit is the lack of some exteNnal appNOVaI (e.g., a TxDOT issued driveway permit), which is outside the control of the City or the applicant. As the option of obtaining a noNmal building permit remains available to the applicant, theNe is no entitlement to a hardship permit, and approval is subject to the discretion of, and reasonable NestNictions imposed by, the Building Official. Review of the Building Official 's decision with regard to a hardship building permit is limited to an informal hearing with the City EngineeN to determine if the Building Official's denial or imposition of conditions is arbitrary or unreasonable. " These revisions maintained the provisions with respect to Single Family development in place with some cleanup of the language with regard to attaining easements and permits ahead of construction. In addition, an exception was added that allowed the developer to move forward with model homes. The issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CIO) for multi-family or non- residential was restricted to approval and recordation of the plat, to receipt of all easements and permits and to the completion of all public improvements. The revised subchapter also stated that no building permit for multi-family or non-residential could be issued until certain minimum conditions, mainly pertaining to fire access/coverage and regional improvements were met. The provision or allowance fora "hardship permit" was stated to be acceptable under certain conditions, but then this permit was defined in such a restrictive manner as to only really be applicable when the only impediment to issuance was a third party or external approval (TxDOT permit for example). In essence, it precluded all other permits ahead of completion of all public improvements. Although this wording has been problematic, staff has been able to work through the issues associated with it for the past nine months with few difficulties. The attached amendment recognizes the need for this subchapter to be updated and further defines the guidelines to issue building permits when all improvements are not in place under certain conditions. In summary, the City will not issue building permits for single-family or duplex residential until such property has received final plat or development plat approval and is in conformity with the provisions of the subdivision regulations, the plat has been recorded, all easements including those by separate instrument and all applicable permits are in place, and all public improvements have been accepted (if applicable). This language is really no different than presented before with the only real change being a limitation on the number of model homes per phase of a development. The amendment similarly restricts multi-family and non residential development except upon application and satisfaction of certain conditions, whereupon the building official may issue what amounts to a "conditional" building permit for multi-family or non-residential development to enable limited construction prior to satisfaction of remaining development requirements. OPTIONS 1. Recommend approval of the attached amendments to Subchapter 35.16.6.D. 2. Recommend approval of the attached amendments with modifications. 3. Recommend denial. 4. Table. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the attached amendments to Subchapter 35.16.6.D. PRIOR ACTION/~ October 11, 2006 January 10, 2007 January 24, 2007 February 21, 2007 February 28, 2007 November 14, 2007 November 28, 2007 ZEVIEVV (Council, Boards, Commissions) Planning and Zoning Commission work session Planning and Zoning Commission work session Planning and Zoning Commission work session Planning and Zoning Commission work session Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing Planning and Zoning Commission work session Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing EXHIBITS I. Recommended changes to Subchapter 35.16.6.D. 2. Planning and Zoning Minutes Minutes 3. Ordinance Respectfully submitted, °~ ?~~ Frank G. Payne, P.E. City Engineer 35.16.6. [Existing subsections A-C unchanged] D. EXHIBIT 1 General Rule - No Permits Before Plat. Generally speaking, no building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any parcel or tract of land until such property has received final plat or development plat approval and is in conformity with the provisions of these subdivision regulations, the plat has been recorded, all easements (including those by separate instrument) and all applicable permits are in place, and all public improvements have been accepted (if applicable). No private improvements shall take place or be commenced except inconformity with these regulations. 1. Exceptions. a. Definitions Applicable to All Exceptions 1. "Phase" means one final platted section of a larger overall development. 2. "Public improvements" means the public infrastructure needed or required by the development, or by a single phase within a larger overall development, 3. "Re Tonal improvements" means those public improvements which are required of the development for the protection of either: a. health, safety and welfare of the public at large; or b. property outside or surrounding the development; i. Examples of Regional improvements include, but are not limited to: (a). water line "loops" or extensions for service; (b). regional detention facilities, (c). off site drainage improvements. b. Model Home Exception for Single Family Residential or Duplex Development 1. Within a phase containing public improvements that have not yet been finally accepted, a developer may construct no more than four (4) model homes, provided that all off site, drainage or regional improvements have been installed, inspected and accepted and that each model home is inspected and found to meet all building, plumbing and fire code requirements prior to being opened to observation by the public, and provided further that the home will not be sold or occupied as a dwelling unit until all public improvements within that phase have been completed and accepted by the City. c. Exception for Multi-Family or Non residential Development. 1. Upon application and satisfaction of the following conditions, along with other Code and Criteria Manual requirements otherwise applicable to full building permits, the building official may issue a building permit for multi-family or non-residential development, to enable limited construction as specified in the permit, prior to satisfaction of remaining eve opment requirements: a. The applicant must complete installation of all drainage and other regional improvements, particularly off site improvements; i. Upon application to, and approval by, the City Engineer, the portion of this condition requiring prior installation of required permanent drainage improvements may be satisfied by constructing temporary drainage improvements (such as detention ponds) that, in the opinion of the City Engineer, are adequate to offset the decrease in permeable surface of the permitted phase of development and prevent harm to downstream EXHIBIT 1 properties, pending completion and acceptance of required permanent regional improvements for drainage. b. The applicant must enter into an agreement with the City, in a form approved by the City Attorney, which indemnifies and holds the City harmless for any failure of the applicant, owner or builder to obtain necessary access and drainage easements and permits, or to build needed offsite improvements; and c. A building permit issued in this manner may be withdrawn upon failure to meet any imposed condition, as set forth in §35.1.10. 2. The applicant must install and demonstrate proper function of fire hydrants and all- weather access improvements for fire apparatus required by the Fire Code and Chapter 29 of the Denton Code of Ordinances, prior to any construction above slab. [Existing subsection E is deleted, and subsections F and G are renumbered as E and F, respectively.] Z~~TTNG ~~~UL~R ETON N~M~ER ~ 8, 2 ~ Q7 FLANN~NG 1ti1D 85 I ~ri~fISSIC~ ~S: Hold a public hearin es 1 was the main tern., then exoial ar~3 malti-family 2 a~ o~asider malcir~ a. reocrm~dation to the Dents City 2 c~velolxnents v~xe all,ow~d to proceed with. a buildin pest 3 Council on the fol~.owir~ its: pr~osed its to 3 Staff was given the direction to mice the meter 16 of the Eton Developme~at Oode aoncernin ~ 4 practice ~riatch the code or 'the aode patch the practice. So , s, of plats; o~struct~.ar~ of publ~.c irrpxovement ecordin 5 5 ~ 2407-074 was apprraved on March 27th and represents g r . G staff's atte~cpt to dQ just that . 6 buildtn permits . 7 There wasn't a whale tat different for 7 Frank Payne, our City ~gineex. This is ~a staff g Pit .. PAi~iE : Govc~ ~~ • 8 sileT~amiiy develo~x~nt. A little bi,t of cleanup ~ 9issuse that updates this secti~, 35.~~.6 of the Genton 9~ ~ Y 1171 ring that they attain easer~nts aax~ pern~i.ts ~ . of }its~'~j red, Prior to P+~rch l p ~evelapm~-t e r g p y`~ 10 ~ ak~ad of cca~struction. in a:i.tion, exception wes added 11 27th of this yeax, this subchapter of the code stated the 11 that a13.owed the eloper' tao mom forward with the model 12 following as You see on the bard. It's very suinct ark 12 hrnre. 13 ciseg and it basically said, for all e~.tr no 13 .Still talked about the certificate of Z4 }wilding pesmtit of ~, Oex#.ificate of pecupancy, would be ~& occupancy restricted to approval and. rrdatz of the plat., 15 issued until the followinrequirements were met. 15 -LL seetr~ somewhat c~vi.ous T- and to receipt of all easnts 16 ~ psions were applied consistently 15 and pezmits and to the completion of all public imprr~vements X'7 foar sinle-fammly C~`velaprnent . 'There wTas -- there' S beer- a 17 far mu1'tl-fanuly or 3IL°s1dP~laZ ~ 8 period of titm~ wh~i those provisions w2xe modified sames~at a xn~rioer of exceptions 18 And then it provided . . 19 in practice for {tulti-family and ea~mercial delopm~nt due emit far 19 unc~x which the app].icaa~t c~ald receive a huildin pe 2 0 to the nature of that type of develent . In other ~ 2 0 multi-family and n~areSidential • I apologize for the size of tQ r~Celve 21 ~t u~uld allow certain pC1~t1CQ]S . of the elc~nt 21 flue type. But, basically, what It told t[I YJaS that ~f lets C~OR~]_]~etlClCl -- 2 2 the building permit issuance Pte` to ~rnp ~ ~ had ~ rnional l~]rCCCI~]lts dam, which would be Nl]!Ch d5 ~ 1 for of all the tic 2 3 if CYJat s runt Hugh you - _ 23 regior~.l detention pond or a rni vaaterliz~ -- and what T if there was access to the In other v~~3s 2 4 . by that is a waterline a det~ation p i~prcavirag ar , ~ ~ rali. the looped ~ster3.anes 25 site, fare protecti;cn and, a Yg 2 5 impactir~ more one piece of prey, that had 87 88 had vier to 1 access to provide fire protecticng that Y~ 1 v~iat w~ try to do. Atadr ageing You have Chas ccm~lete text 2 provide fire protec:tio~ir and that You- entered irate a u~le- 2 in Yom' ~~• . 3 ha~1~s agreement with the ~tyg and they w~a];d al].ca~r you to 3 Naurf if you look an ~eibit 1 under Item D, rntit, a hardsx~ip bui~.d~n 4 m forward with a bui].din pe 4 general rule, no permits before plat, you'~.1 see that permit. Arad the ar~.y fallacy was the restrictive naCure of S 5 first sentence there nr~t match the first sentence ~ the . 6 the definit.icn of ]~ard,~Y,ip }gilding permit. And it 5 board. And there's four wards miss3x~g. Dam within Chat ts to issuance when the Y abstacle~to ted Chase perrn7 7 lim~ 7 mace, where it says the plat has beery recorded, all . . lag t was a thud-paxty app~r such as 8 receive a~ ~ 8 earents, including those by separate instrument, are in 9 a TxDot pent, So, essenti.a~.lyg they ail defaulted back to instn~nent, it ~ place, after the closed parenthesesr after letion of all public improvements prier t4 ~3.dir~ 10 ocrr r~ ~9JL11d 11 all appllL~le per~`~.ts." 311e1t'r~`! b a -rr p 11 of this subchapter since it was last modified in March. Anti . 11 pexmit issusryce• 12 I' talked to Jerry we passed the ordiz~arvice ~ ~2 In p~cacticer >~7at we've a is work with 13 building officials to look at the practial applicat~.on of 13 cc~.mcil that it will contain that lanuage. to look at v~iat -- did it, in fact, make sense. Did 14 tYais ~.~ Sa what this provision allcRVS zsr r ~ have access? Ate they 15 they Piave fire protection. 'Did they I S essentially, the same thin . You -'t go forward wa.th a ~ ~ putting in a r~egiona~- detention that if they d~'t 16 side-famil telopment permit Lentil you have all youx y 17 c~p~.ete i.tg are they incr~easir>g ru~f€ to the neighbors? 17 dins in a r~7w as far as utilities and other public . 18 And then we. would m fo~+~ard. ~. Pad that's ~.~ i.mp~ravemer-ts. You can mire foxw~d with a t~onditional pernut . 1 ~ essentially what I' m sayixxg on these ~lide~ . 1 ~ ~ c~mnercaal and ma].ti-family as 1 as y+au can shovr that 1 before you tonight -° and 2 4 i~at w~ re brir~axx~ ~ 0 You've got water in placer that You've got a -- }aefore ~ }~ and 1111 21 I have to admLt, there's d typo ~ your` clog 21 Y~ qet Your pexmaner~t dram, if y'~ ask for an excepti~ ham sufficient torazY 22 point it. out to you an dust a ~ -- we try to leak at the 22 to that drainage feature that You 23 cede as a living document. Atx~. v,t I'm brining to you 23 drainage improvem°nts on-site to pzrotect aJ.xi provide adequate is the final completion of our 29 detention prior to oa~letion of your' fir3al improvemmnts, 2 4 tonight is simp~.y vat we hope 2 ~ m ~ to ;"~"""' the match the pr'actlCe, WiLL4~1 1~ 2 ~ ag~.nr wl '~•`" Y411V.1~~-iICLGILL4~~$ ~1t • +~°'' 411~i ~ ~A~Cx~T~ DE`I'~~, T~~Aa X940} ~~5-9797 . TOk~F~L ~L~NNING ] ~~NIN~ RE~UL~iR E I~N~ NO~TE~iBER ~ 8 , ~ 0 4 ~ s~ ~0 ~ bt~ildir~ permit issued in this marmex may be withdrav~ai u 1 N~. PAYI~: 'die reason that w~ left it in is ~ failure by the applicant to met any of those conditions. 2 because staff's r~ticn is restricts t~ two per ease 3 it's talcir~ out the haxd.~hip 3 arl the ].aYger clop~rrsnts. Ate. certainly ~ the scr~.ler 4 defin~:tian, makirug it mare ~f a ccrc~d.itiona]. pern~it that 4 ctt~es, tw~7 model hoes shod be suf~iCient to show tk~ 5 pro~rdes the .ildir~ official with the flexibility that he 5 huildex''s prod~.ict. if y~au wish to mxlify that lan~age and ~ weds. I ~his~C that the builders c~velopers will find 5 make a xecoanition that it be ~o~u' per pie, can 7 this lan~age a lot easier to work wi.tY~, quite frankly. ~ T ir~cl~e that ~ Yom' ~tiaa~ to City C'cil as we $ Wit7t that, I'll ans~aer any c~estians you 8 take it before tkxar-. . 9 mic~t have. ~ 9 ~SSICffi~ 'I9S: Olssy• Zhu . 1.0 QSIC&~k2 V~i~~NS : Arty questions? 1 D O~+MISSIt ~~: ~y ot~ber questions? 11 ~ CIISI ~~: Mr'. Payne, v~12Si ~ 1I All rig~it, 'hank you very -tuch. I have no ~.~ bight this to work sessi~ before on~ the r~del ~.~ ~ far ar against this. it is a public hearir~. Ia there 13 exception, since we, basically; tallced over the fact that 13 awe else that wishes to speak for or against it? Y. ~. ~ tYlE' S n0 ~l1C~l. ~h7~ aSi You ~DWr re~iC~a~. 1T~~ts ]n~ ~~ I'll c~.0~e the public '], 15 say, a 5D-lot subdivisa.on, tltiat we cazld go aY~ad az~ ~~ this 15 C?~MISIC ~: I t~gve approval with 3.6 to four ~r~odel h~res~ beoa~ase there's, generally, at least four 16 the modification to' Item .1, Sl~achapter ~, referrar~ to tie 17 different mods foa~ some of these larger builders? 17 l hams e,~acegti~, and increasing it fr~n twt~ to. four I8 ~1R. PAYN~: I would ague with what you're 18 models per Vie. 19 saying. with one sli~it caveat . 'There can be a regicma7, 19 I ~ ~ ~ • G~~ i[tpro~it with LI~l~G ~~r UG~~~~~'7~ ~ r~~~^~y ,,,~,. ~,7 ~y....,~, ~ rry LiV U.di•1I~7~7Iwd.YP~R !~Y!°i~: ~GL:V1A4r SL~tuus$lo~r 2l t~7dt ~ cme V~71th the perimeter pa~nng ~.ssue« We. did talk 2l k~gleton. Please vote on tie board. . ~ 2 . abut the. four ~ homes . We chose to leave it in ark ~ . 2 ~ N~. ~: Befos~: you do, i just ~snted to 2 3 allow to make that discretior~y charge, i.f You w~h, in 2 3 clarify. Does that include the ~ ition that Mr. Payee made 2 4 'this ~tir~ in this msetirxg. ~ ~ 4 ver3x~llY? 2 5 C~+MISSICR ~S : Dkay . 2 5 CSIISSIR ~ : 'i'har~k ferry . Yes . 93 92 ~. IncT~ staff's motions. ~ 2 OSSI i+~TKII+1S : Please vote on the . ~ 3 board. ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ 5 ~ ~ .6 ~ 7 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 9 10 1~ i1 ~ 11 I~ ~~ 13 13 . I4 14 I5 15 I6 I6 ~~ 17 18 18 Z 9 19~ . 2~ ~~ 2~ .~ Z1 ~~ ~ 22 ~~ 23 24 24 2~ ~~ T~F`FE~ ~ ~I~TE DENT~4N, TE:A~ { 9 ~ ~ } 5 G ~~ - 9'~ ~ 7 . s;lour ~acumentslor~inances1081dca~b-0~~7.dac ~~~~ ~~. Exhibit 3 AID ~RDI~ANCE ~F THE CITY ~F DE~T~N, TEA, AMEl~DIN P~RTI~N ~~` SUBCHAPTER X5.16, OF THE DEI~'I'~N DEVELOPMENT CEDE, PERTAn~IN T~ REC~RDINC~ ~F PLATS, C~~TRUCTI~N OF PI~BLIC IlVIPRD~E~VIEI~IT,AND ISSUANCE ~P BLDINC~ PERMITS; PRDVIDIN~ ~ PENALTY wITH THE AO~JNT OF ~,~O~.~a FAR ~IOLATI~N THEREOF; AND PRDVIDIN FAR E~ERAEfLITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~DCA~6~001'~} WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance ~o. 2a~~~~4~, the City Council ofthe C1ty ofDentan, Texas adopted the Denton Development Cvde the "Development Cade'}; and wHEREA, a~tcr providing notice and after conducting public hearings as required by law, the Planning and honing Con~nissian recommended approval of certain changes to Subchapter 35.1 of the Deve~opn~ent Cade, pertaining to recording o~ plats, cc~truction of public improvements, and issuance of building permits; and WHEREAS, aver providing notice and after conducting a public hearing as required by law, the City Council finds that the changes to ~ the Develapn~ent Code are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and are in the public interest. N~~V, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL ~F THE CITY ~F DENTIN HEREBY` ORDAIl~S: SECTION ~. The findings and recitations contained in the prearn~le of this ordinance are incorporated herein by reference a~s tree. SECTI~~T ~. Subchapter 35,1 of the Development Cade is hereby amended in part, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and nude part hereof by reference. AlI other provisions of Subchapter 5.1 ~ not specifically changed by this amendment shall remain in fall farce and effect. ETYDN 3. Any person ~~olat~ng any pro~lslan ofthls ordnance shall, upon conviction, be freed a sum not exceeding $2,~~0.~~. Each. day that a provision of this ordinance is violated sha11 constitute a separate and distinct offense. EOTIDN 4. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word in this ordinance, ar the application thereof to any person yr circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such ho~ding shall not affect the va11d1ty of the remaining port1ons of this ordinance, and the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective fourteen ~1~}days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, a daily newspaper published . the City afDenton, Texas, within ten ~l ~} days of the date of its passage. ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ the ~ ~~.~ ~~ _ ___ , .~ ~a~~. ATTLT. J~~N~'ER ALTER., ~~TY ~~R~TAR.~ EY; SAE ~ Ex~iblt A 3.1 G,G, Existing subsections A- unchanged D. enerai Rule ~ Na Pern~~ts ~efare,,,,.,.~lt, enerll~ speaking, na building permit or certificate ofoccu one shall be issued far an reel or tract ofland until such. praperhas P ~ ~ received final plat ar development plat approval and is in conformity with the provisions of these subdivisiol~ regulations, the plat has been recorded, all easerrlents ~inoluding those by separate inst.ment} and all applicable permits are in place and all public in~praven~ents have been accepted cif applicable}, ~a private improvements shall tale place or be commenced except in conformity with these regulations. 1, E~ce~tions. a, Definitions A Iie~bie to All ~~ce flans 1. "Phase" means one final platted section of a larger overall development. ~. "Public ~n~ rovernents"means the public irifrastructurc needed or required by the development, or by a single phase within a larger overall development, 3. "Regional in~provement~" means thaw public irnprave~nents which are required of the develapn~ent for the protection of either: a. health, safety' and welfe of the public at large; or b. property outside ar surrounding the develaprrlent; i, Examples of Regional ipraven~ents include, but are not limited to: . ~}. water line "loops" ar extensions far service; }• regional detention facilities, ~c}. off site drainage in~pravelnents. b. Model ~Io~ne E~ce flan far Yn le ~'amil Residential ar I]u lex ~evelo meat within a phase containing public i~npraveen.ts that ha~re not het been all accepted, a developer nay construct no mare than four ~~} ~nvdel homes, provided that all off--site, drainage ar regional i~npravernents have been installed, inspected and accepted and that each model home is inspected and found to meet all building, plumbing and dire code require~rlents prier to being opened td observation by the public,and provided further that the home will not be sold ar occupied as a dwelling unit until all public improvements within that phase have been completed and accepted by the pity. c. ~xce tiara for Multi~~'~mil ar ion residential De~velo meat. 1. ~Jpon appl~cat~on and sat1sfactlan of the follaw~.n cand~t1ons, along with other. fade and criteria 1Vlanual requizeents otherv~ise applicable to hall building permits, the b~uld~n official ~rlay Issue a building permit far multi-fancily ar non.- residential development, to enable limited construction as specified ~n the permit, prior to satisfaction of remaining development requirements: a. 'fhe applicant must complete intallatian of all drainage and other regional in~proven~ents, particularly off site in~pro~rements; PACx~ 3 i. Upon applictian to, and approval by, the 1ty Engineer, the pardon of this condition requiring prior installation ofrequired permanent drainage improvements nay be satisfied by constructing ternparary drainage in~provnent such s detention ponds} that, i the opinion of the pity Engineer, are adequate to offset the decreaae in permeable surface of the permitted phase of development and prevent harm to davvr~.trem prapertics, pending completion and acceptance of required permanent regional improvements for drainage. b. ~`hc applicant must enter into an agreement with the pity, in a farm approved by the City Attorney, which indemnifies and holds the pity harrnless for any failure of the applicant, owner ar builder to obtain necess~.ry access and drainage easements and permits, or to build needed affsite hnpravements; and c. A building permit issued in this manner nay be withdrav~rn upon failure to meet any imposed condition, as set forth in X35.1.1 a. 2. T'he applicant must install aid demonstrate proper function of fire hydrants and all-weather access in~proveents for ire apparatus required by the p'ire bode and chapter ~~ of the Benton fade of ~rdlnances, prior to ar~y construction above slab. [~~~stin subsection E is deleted, end subsections F and ire renumbered as E end ~, respectively, PAGE 4 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: January 8, 2008 DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CM: George Campbell, City Manager ~T 1R.TF,CT Consider nominations/appointments to the City's Boards and Commissions. BACKGROUND The following boards/commissions require nominations: Planning and Zoning Commission -This is Mary Thibodeaux's position. This is a nomination for Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Mulroy. If you require any further information, please let me know. Respectfully submitted: Jennifer Walters City Secretary S:1Boards & CommlAgenda Info Sheet for Vacancies 01.08.08.docx