Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-19-1994
`I fII I I II, 1 1 I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET 7/19/94 3 , 4 p 4 Y s y I~ M1. V Y 14 f ~ fr; i' Ape~aa~te~- = AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL JULY 19, 1994 Executive Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 191 19940 at 5:15 p.m. in the civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKis.nay, Denton, Texas, at which the following iteras will be considered: 5:15 p.m. 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071 1. Consider claim against GTE for payment of franchise i fees. 1 B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.072 1. Consider acquisition of real property near the Spencer water Treatment Plant. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.074 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 19, 1994 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTES Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may 1 also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session. 6:00 p.m. 1. Presentation and discussion of the Hotel/Motel Tax Recipients budgets by the Denton County Historical Foundation, the Denton County Historical Museum, the Greater Denton Arts Council and the North Texas State Fair Association. Appraisal discussion District's regarding a review of 2. Receive rentral and hold a the Denton C 3. Receive a report regarding an early warning system. 4. Hold a discussion regarding participation in the North Texas Commission. i f i s i; i ondaNo 9y` +genda~te Alf y / -4 City of Denton City Council Agenda add6 July 19, 1994 Page 2 Regular Matt7:00 pm. in the Council Chambers of City THall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Consider approval of the minutes of the Work Session of June 14, 1994. i , 3. Presentation of the Keep Texas Beautiful Annual Awards and the Yard of the Month Awards. 4. Citizen Reports A. Receive a citizen report from Dalton Gregory, President- Board of Directors for Science Land of Denton, regarding revenue collected by the City of Denton through the hotel/motel occupancy tax. 5. Public Hearings A. oHold a rdinance urezoninga 5i 5636 nacresn from aacommercial (C) district to the multi-family - (MF-1) district. The Prairie Hollow Apartment site is located directly north of Prairie Street and east of interstate 35. Z-94-014 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6-0). B. Hold a public hearing and consider variances to Section 1 34-114(9) and Appendix A-1 pertaining to the maximum } grades at street intersections and on local/residential ! streets for Southridge Estates, Phase I. This 20.034 acre site is located on Lillian Miller Parkway at Southridge Drive. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6-0.) C. ordinance Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an 79.69 acres located along FM 2164 and extending approximately 3,482 feet north of Bobcat Road. A-65 (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 6-0.) i t i t AperrdaNo Agodall " Date City of Denton City Council Agenda a „J July 19, 1994 °D Page 3 D. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance amending the regulatory line map so as to include the area located east of FM 2164 in the vicinity of 3'M 2153 in Division I of the ETJ. (The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval 6-0.) E. Hold a public hearing to consider a preliminary replat of Lots 16-18 of Block C, Timber Oaks addition, into Lots 16R and 18R, and consider the preliminary plat of Lots 1- 7 of Block A, Lots 3-34 of Block B, Lots 1-22 of Block C and Lots 1-13 of Block D of the Crown Oaks Addition. The sites, totaling 24.43 acres, are located north and east of Teasley Lane at Hobson Lane. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 6-0.) r 6. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his E designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. The City Council has received background information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. DetrAled back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 7.B, 7.C). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. Upon the receipt of a "request to speak" form from a citizen regarding an item on the Consent Agenda, the itim 1 shall be removed and be considered before approval of the consent ! Agenda. A. Bids aed Purchase orders: 1. Bid 11650 - Kings Row Water 6 Sewer Utility Improvements 2. Bid 01651 - Stonegate 8" Waterline 3. PO 145953 - Darr Equipment Co. 4. RFSP 11644 - Retrospective Conversion Services i 1 I 1 i r agendaNo Agendallert~~-"- Date 7 C?M City of Denton City Council Agenda 6V V July 19, 1994 Page 4 B. Plats and Replats 1. Preliminary replat of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, Denton Regional Medical Center Addition, plus 12.6 acres of unplatted land into Lots 1R and 2. The 48.398 acre site is located northeast of Interstate I35-E and northwest of Mayhill Road. (The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval 6-0.) 2. Preliminary plat of Lots 1-10 of Block A and Lots 1-21 of Block B, Deerwood Addition, Phase III. The 12.9 acre site is located north of Kings Row and west of Farris Road. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6-0.) 7. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (6.A.2. - Bid #1650, 6.A.2. - Bid 02651) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (6.A.4. - PO ~J /45953) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting a competitive sealed proposal and awarding a contract for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (6.A.1. - RFSP 11644) 4 D. Consider adoption of an ordinance rezoning a 17.9335 acre tract located on the east side of Ruddell Street south of the extension of East Hickory Street from single-family dwelling (SF-7) zoning district to Light Industrial- conditioned [LI(c)] zoning district. Z-93-013 (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 6- D.) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an inter local agreement with the City of Denton and the Texas Department of Transportation for acquiring necessary right-of-way for U. S. Highway 380. i i c } {Q8!ldSNO• '7~~~ r age~daltertt„, ~-r Date City of Denton City Council Agenda .5 July 19, 1994 Page 5 F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the 1993-94 budget of the City of Denton by appropriating the sum of $26,263 from the unobligated fund balance of the General Fund to account number 100-022-0019-9001; and providing for publication. i G. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to a contract with Lone Star Gas Company and the cities of Bryan, Greenville and Garland for the transfer of gas. H. Consider adoption of an ordinance awarding a contract between the City of Denton and Lone Star Gas Company for the transportation of gas. I. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the purchase of gas from Lone Star Gas Ctoapany such purchase being available from only one source in accordance with the provisions of State law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bidding. J. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Section 26-3 through 26-7 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton ny establishing requirements for deposits for utility services received from the City. 8. Consider nominations/appointments to City Boards and Commissions. 9. Vision Update 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. J 11. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 12. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. I 1 i i +GendaNo, Agendas Date City of Denton City Council Agenda a$~6- July 19, 1994 Page 6 13. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071 B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.072 C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.074 NOTEt THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. i C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the abov9 notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, o'clock x st on the day of , 1994 at CITY SECRETARY NOTE. THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE 1 CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS j I DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH ~ THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ACCOOIF5 i f 1 ~ ' - ~CITY~ - ~COUNCI i~ I ~ 1 _.I ~ Nr 4 ~ 0 ~ Oo ~ tIL4, I it G, DENTON COUNTY HISST~ORICgAL FOUNDATI ~ Denton, Texss 76202 &6 f1--' w DENTON COUNT CD T5*Afi July 14,1094 Mayor Bob Castleberry City Council Members City of Denton Denton, Texas Tne Denton County Historical Foundation, Inc, is pleased to honor your request for its budget for the 1994-1995 fiscal year for funding with Lalor funds The proposed budget was approved by the DCHF, Inc. Board of Directors for presentation to you as requested by your financial staff for the July 19, 1994 council meeting. ongoing. There red We believe you will find this budget fulfills the out within thequcity l ofbDe l nton regarding the Lalor money. The historical are funds committed to projects underway. nding for the Currently we have a number of historical marker applications pe city of Denton. This j past year we are pleased to have dedicated two markers within the city limits. A cemetery the is being s published and research section. The ndmaculate Conception Catholic Church l onrnNo h In a numbV 0' locations Elm has recently received approval for a Texas Historical Marker to be located on their church Fowler maLibrarl wa! i grounds. Tourists seek these markers when traveling in this area. j j The Lalor funds you provide allow our many volunteers to work toward preservation of the City of Denton's history. These funds are In addition to in-kind services provided by pentcn County. i i Progress is being made toward the publication of theo'J Os of met CourrCensL:s hous Book for the City 01 Denton. The AG Vlar Memorial Project for the g emote tourism In moving toward completion. A map of all historical markers is in process. We share with the Museum and others In co-op advertising b&,h local and out of town to pr Denton. for the fiscal year just ended. Please note A covers a period of nine months included is the audit in order to make the transition to a twelve month fiscal year beginning October 1, 1994. We thank you for your encouragement, support and funding of this h stohc work Ma urene Matthews Chairman,DCF'F 111' 4-1 112:111 ti eon D. Calliha , sr. Vice-Chairman, DCHF ~I • 3 ~ 4-7 go~noaHo~'023 ~ Ageod~lt ~ ~ aat~ - / BUDGET DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION, INC. INCLUDING OPERATIONS BUDGET OF DENTON COUNTY I IISTORICAL COMMISSION INCOME Lalor Funds, City of Denton $100210.00 1.00 2.00 Donations (Designated) t 3.00 Interest (Designated) i TOTAL INCOME $10,210.00 i I i '92-'93 093-'94 '94-095 EXPENSES 500.00 500.00 500.00 100E Slides 6 photographs v 2100E Archives 6 Reference Library 300.00 300.00 300.00 3:OOE Publications 2650.00 3,200.003,200.00 3.01E Publication Reprints 3.02E Brochures/Maps 260.00 260.00 4:00n Projection Equipment/Supplies 260.00 5100E Memberships, Training 6 505.00 505.00 1,000.00 Subscriptions 6100E Heritage Projects 850.00 1,850.00 1,850.00 6:01E Historical Markers 6:02E Cemetery Projects 6t03E Museum Assistance 2#000.00 2,000.0 2,000.00 7100E Business iAudit offi & IRSOperations ) Reports 200.00 200.00 B:OOE Historical Education 200.00 9100E capital improvements 400.00 400.00 400.00 i 10100E Contingency Fund 500.00 500.00 500.00 TOTAL EXPENSES $10,210.00 i r + vdaNo...--- ti 4genda~ten -V ~....r.. Date _ r 4 ai ti DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL s FOUNDATION INC. I" FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 I~ i F, a Y• f~ 1 7 ~ M i i W { -I t ° ~r` r j .N T w agenda ko. u'Oa g 4gendalt tote,. - -4V, w Table o Contents i ~ page I ; Accountants' Opinion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Fund Balances . . . . . . . , . 3 r; r3 Statement of Support, Revenues and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 w Statement of Changes in Fund Balances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 t~ Statement of Sources and Uses of Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 F Notes to financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T-g Supplementary Information: C I Statement of Changes in General Fixed Assets . . . . . . . . . . 10 r. Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenses Budget and Actual . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1 ~s t r,• i r. a; ry;` i Y ' k? MEMBERS M£MSEAS TEXAS SOCJM OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF Fi CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS CERTIFIED I COUNTANT HANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, DEATON 8 TONN pendaN~ ~ " I A Professional Corporation t CERTIFIED PMUO ACCOUNTANTS 4gEndalt Cl.~S W 902 DNORTH LOCUST It P.O. BOX ENTONa' EXA Sf~7e202-0g77 977 (,igi8 7 3 N {r INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT kJ Ir F'r Board of Directors Denton County Historical Foundation, Inc. P. 0. Box 2184 Denton, TX 76202 We have audited the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities, and fund balances - cash basis of Denton County Historical Foundation, Inc. as of September 30, 1993, and the related statements of support, revenue, and expenses -cash basis, of changes in fund balances - cash basis and sources and uses of cash for the nine months then ended. These financial statements are the { responsibility of the Organization's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on cur audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain y reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material i misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes 1 assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation, We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. t As described in Note 1, the Organization prepares its financial statements on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements except that the statements include a provision for depreciation of equipment. This basis is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, I in all material respects, the assets, liabilities, and fund balances of Denton County Historica'. Foundation, Inc. as of September 30, 1993, and its support, revenue and expenses, and the changes in its fund balances for the nine months „ then ended, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1. i e r If I k ~ 1 N I f f r 1 AY•l~ i gendaNo i Mate ic b3 w our audit was conducted for the purpose of forintaansopinion on tpagessl0 i financial statements taken as a whole. The supp m part l of a the presented inafor ncialrstatements. Suchainformationahasabeenosubjected rto { the additing procedures affppplied in the audit of the basic financial statements ,u financial opinion, statements tastated i ken as a wholmaterial respects in relation to the basic w s,,,K,`"s =rte Hankins Rowers; foa'stu , Deaton !4 Tonn r A Professional Corporation Certified Public Accountants t W May 12, 1994 i~ } r ' t ~y 1 Y If ! i I 6 r r 2 Y f , a ~ i t DENT` OH COUNTY HISTORICAL f0UMDATION. INC. Vod&No Niun S ei►dall Cj- STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES AgDee w SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 General Operating Fixed y» Fund Restricted Assets Total ASSETS Current Assets Cash - Commission Operations $ 3,871 $ 3,87I S 9,534 9,534 Cash Foundation/Lalor l34 Cash - IOOF Fence Fund 134 2,134 2,462 Cash - Fire Truck Fund 19,524 19,524 Cash - All War Memorial Fund 13,174 Certificate of Deposit 13,174 239 Due from Foundation 239 0 Due from Operating 20 2 220 k r+ Due from Fire Truck 17,284 31t874 49,158 i Total ,a { Office Furniture and s Equipment, net (Note 4) 8.24 8.241 Total Assets 17 .8 $31.87 4 $ 8.241 57.,3 99 r'V LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Current Liabilities S 239 ; 239 Due to Commission 20 20 ! Due to Fire Truck S 200 200 Due to Foundation Total Current Liabilities 20 439 459 Fund Balances (Note 1) Investment in Fixed Assets 8.241 8,241 Foundation/Lalor 9,495 9,495 IOOF Fence Fund 134 134 Fire Truck Fund 21282 2,282 All War Memorial Fund 19,524 19,524 Unappropriated 1 26 17,264 Total Fund Balance 17,264 31.435 8.241 56.94_0 Total Liabilities and - Fund Balance 1S 7,284 3S l Ljj 241 L5.7 + i { See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. .J 3 u 1 H DENTON COUNTY HISTQR,Ig,4L FOMNDATION, INC. Wga No nenGaEtem STATEML,2T OF SUPPORT, REVENUES AND EXPENSES '7' FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 8oklr-3 General Operating Fixed `Fund Restricted Assets Total SUPPORT AND REVENUES Government Support Hotel Occupancy Tax (Note 5) S 5,689 $5,689 ' Public Support (Note 6) All War Memorial 2,647 2,647 Fire Truck 6 6 Revenue Book Sales S 174 174 Interest 207 207 Total 74 8,549 8,723 EXPENSES Audit 800 800 j Operational Supplies 386 386 Subscriptions/Mc-mpberships 606 606 Archives/Reference 51 51 Photography 103 103 Historical Fducation 405 405 Heritage Projects 62 62 Future Publications 207 07 Publication Reprints 444 444 i Depreciation $ 949 949 { I Other 25 25 Fixed Asset Additions 1,314 1,314 i Total 4,403 _ 949 5.352 c - Excess of Support and Revenue Over Expenses Before Capital Additions (49229) 81549 (949) 3,371 j Capital Additions 1,314 1,314 Excess of Support and Revenue Over Expenses After Capital Additions 1(43229) S 8,549 S 365 $ 4,685 { M. See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. 4 r. r a~ e •f 4 f ✓ y I OENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL fOUNUATION._ NC. GtJ STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN F'.ND BALANCES 9 ~ FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 General t , Operating Fixed f and Re is d Asset s dotal ~ .a Beginning Balance January 1, 1993 $16,493 $27,886 $ 7,876 $52,255 50000 (51000) Transfers Excess of Support and Revenue Over Expenses After Capital 4s229) 8 549 365 _ 4.b85 i Additions 1 I i 0 Ending Balance 17 ,264 $31,j35 £,8,241 $56.94 September 30, 1993 ~fs~~- ~i .a 6 i t i5 w5 1 j SeE Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. ' ~ 5 • C t~ y ~c ry ~S 1 «1 tI iendeN0 c. pENT H COUNTY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION. 40e~da}i STATEMENT OF SOURCES AND USES OF CASH r, FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Opts 7r D 2/ r` SOURCES OF CASH Excess of Support and Revenue over $ 3,371 expenses before Capital Additions Capital Additions 1,314 ,M Excess of Support and Revenue over 4,685 expenses after Capital Additions Depreciation 949 Total Sources of Cash 5.634 USES OF CASH Fixed Assets Purchased 1,314 Decrease in due to OCH Museum, Inc. 1,611 Total Uses of Cash 2,926 Increase in Cash 2.70 s ! J I R• j See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. - 6 , i. DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION. INC. 44aAdANo- NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AflBRdaiIB~ w SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Date Note 1 Significant Accounting Policies The accounts of the Denton County Historical Foundation, Inc. are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that compose its assets. liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures. In the financial statrments in this report, the various funds are grouped into the following fund types and categories: Operating Fund - The operating fund is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Restricted Funds - The restricted fund consist of four different funds. alor - The Lalor Fund represents a portion of the Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax collected by the City of Denton. It is to be used in preserving the heritage of Denton County. Fire Truck Pro.iect - Contributions to the Fire Truck Project are to be used for the restoration and maintenance of the fire i Truck. t w. All War Memorial Fund - On July 4, 1991, a plan was proposed to honor all those Denton County residents who have served in the wars from Spanish American War through Desert Storm, with a memorial to be placed on the Denton County Courthouse lawn. The cost of the completed memorial will be $66,000. Construction which is expected to take six months, will begin when all of the money has been raised. During the nine months ended September € 30, 1993, contributions to the All War Memorial Fund were l $2,641. IOOF Fence Fund - The IOOF Fence Fund has been designated to be applied toward the purchase of a historical marker to be placed at the IOOF Cemetery. i General Fined Assets • Fixed assets used in fund type operations are accounted for in the General Fixed Assets Account Group. All fixed assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost is not available. Donated fixed assets are valued at their estimated fair value on the date donated. i k 1 , DENTON COUNTY H15TORICAL FOUNDATION. INC. Ag6ndaNo qy~ . Agertdalt . NOTES SETO FINANCIAL PTEMBER 30, STATEMENTS Not - 51 niflcant Accountin Policies (Continued) Basis of Accounting - The Organization prepares its financial statements on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements. Consequently, certain revenue and the related assets are recognized when received rather than when earned, and certain than when the finan ialrstatements are exenses bligation except is incurred. Accordingly, the recognized w o not intended to rese 1F conformity with generally acceptedaaceouniting principleslts of operations in H t Note 2 - Legally Incoruorate_ dam! She Denton County Historical Foundation, Inc. as foundiedon statuseunder incorporated in the State of Texas on August 6, 1984, Section 501(c)(3) was obtained on January 16, 1985. Note 3 Creation of the Foundation and Suyse uent Events r Prior to August 1984, funds from the Denton Cultural Confederation, Inc.were received by the Denton County Historical Commission, Inc. Due to the 1984 Attorney General's Opinion No. JM-71, which stated that funds received by a county- commission are the property of the county and must be deposited with the Until OctoberH1990,,ithe Foum atii on, ilncturnsallocated to receive those funds. the Denton portion of those funds to the Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. and the i Denton County Historical Commission. Starting in October 1950, the City of Denton contracted with the museum to send the funds directly to the museum 100 percent Therefore, a the funds Denton County received ' therefore bypassing t allocated Foundation. the foundation Historical Commission. Note 4 General Fixed Assets All fixed assets are recorded at cast or at estimated fair market value at the date of gift, if donated. Depreciation is computed on a straight line basis over the estimated useful live 199f the assets. The following is a summary of fixed assets Office furniture and equipment S 4,911 1,214 ~ Other equipment 4.806 Fire Truck 10,931 Less accumulated depreciation 12s 690 Fixed Assets net j 1 1 3 I 1 1 I1 h 14 y l DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION, 1N~. AgenWo. ~ NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS {CONTINUED} Agetb3lt`/ SEPTEMBER 30,1993 wlfe 0 oN to 5 . Hotel/ Motel Occuoancv Tax Revenue Hotel/motel room occupancy tax is collected by the city of Denton. The City of a 'N Denton allocates a portion of the total hotel/motel revenue to the Denton County f Historical Foundation, Inc. The total received by the Denton County Historical r Foundation, Inc. for the nine months are as follows: $ 1,752 f W Quarter ended December 31, 1992 Quarter ended March 31, 1993 1,707 s Quarter ended June 30, 1993 2,230 r, ~ S,b89 i Note 6 Public Suooort and Revenue All contributions are considered to be available for unrestricted use unless specifically restricted by the donor. j a i i r i i 9 t f I DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC 1gWdeNp SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Apx1all STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS Dge,,,,~ FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 /y M Balance Depreciation/ Balance PI 12/31/92 Additions Retirements 09 30 93 R i General Fixed Assets: Office Furniture/ f r. Equipment (Note 4) S 21278 $ 1,148 $ 455 $ 2,971 R Other Equipment (Note 4 131 827 P, Fire Truck (Note 4) 4.8792 06 166 363 _ 4.443 i Total 7,876 1,314 9,49 8 .?41 Investment In General Fixed Assets Provided from: General fund $ 3,070 $ 1,314 $ 586 $ 3,798 Fire Truck Fund 4.806 363 4,443 J ri Total 7,876 LL .314 949 8 241 j ~ - } ~ j s" f ` I See Accompany Notes to Financial Statements. L• 1 10 1 I S i ll'd y F , , y 1 fir. i I I DfNTON CO T Hme101FOUNDA'fI N I lpend~NO 3 SUPFLEMENTARV INFORMATION gull COMBINED STATEMENT Of REVENUES AND EXPENSES + BUDGET AND ACTUAL OetE - FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 0~6 Variance Favorable Actual Budaet _ (Unfavorable) ~ Revenues: $ 5,689 $ 6,124 $ (435) Alllor War Funds Memorial 2,647 -0- 2,647 Al .p_ 6 Fire Truck Fund 6 174 174 •0• Book Sales 201 -0- Total Interest Revenues S 8,723 $ 66,124 $ 2.599 Expenses: Audit $ 3800 80 $ 6900 00 S (514) ' ' Operational Supplies 319 (14 Subscriptions/Memberships 606 51 379 225 174 Archives/R~ference 103 375 272 r, Photography 445 150 (42b) Historical Education 488 Flo Heritage Projects 62 1,488 1,426 Future Publications 241 207 81 444 .p_ (9 1 Publication Reprints 444 525 Oe reciation 25 25 ` Other (1' s~ Fixed Assets 1,314 300 195 195) Project Equipment _0- 195 150 Museum -0- ISO 375 375 Reserve - p• a 772, e Total Expenditures L,5.352 6 1 4 f ~ II s i I r. ' i r i r See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. 11 4r1e0~fN ~ ~ 1 await Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. t + j July 14,1994 I Mayor Bob Castleberry Councilwoman Euline Brock Councilman Mark Chew + Councilman Jerry Cott i Councilman Jack Miller Councilman Harold Perry Counccrhvoman Margaret Smith The Board of Trustees of the Denton County Hrstoricai Museum, Inc. are pleased to present the t lakx funding budget for 1994-95 as requested by the staff of the City of Denton. 1 In reviewing the past year's work, the Board was very pleased to see the growth of the Museum as reflected through the budget process. Each year we continue to build upon past years successes with another great year of work. Ibis can only be accomplished with the support and hard work of many volunteers, interested citizens and e!ected officials. Our staff works well and gives the Museum work a full measure for its dollar. We can not begin to tell you how much the lalor funds mean to the successful operation of the Museum. Other income sources of !n-kind support and funds are also important The people of } I Denton take pride in bringing their guests to see their Museum and their Courthouse. This is as it should be. Enclosed is the audit for the Museum's last fiscal year. We believe you will find we are fiscally responsible in meeting the obligations required for Museums and the public trust ' Again, thank you for your support Sincerely, j I ? `vooure"n~ Nla~ttfiewss Chairman Board of Trustees s: rr A.O. Box 2800 Denton, i':Kas 76202 Courthouse-on-th,!,Square 501(C) (3) Non-Profit Telepbone: (817) 565.8697 or 565.8693 • 1-800.346.3189 • FAX: (817) 382-0845 ,a i j N;1 ipEilQaNp ~^f1~i"'r"" Benda! The Courthouse-on-the-Square Museum continues to be successful In meeting its mission of preserving the heritage of Denton, providing an educational experience for the public and bringing tourist to Denton. Th3 exhibit room hours were extended weeldy by 12 and 1/2 hours (an additional 650 hours per year). The exhibit rooms with the girt shop open at 10:30 a.m. and close at 4:30 p.m. The hall exhibits were enlarged on the first floor with smaller rotating exhibits on the second and third floors. Hall exhibds may be vievred from eight to five week days. Tho office and research library are open to the pub4o from eight to rive Monday through Friday. Educational tours for children are now available year round A group of trained tour guides who provide special children's tours are scheduled with advance notice. Adult tours have Increased tremendously resulting from media advertising. All staff members are cross trained to help with tours should groups arrive without notice. Content of traveling teaching kits has been Improved incorporating teacher suggestions. Historical paper doll books with diaries are included to provide a oolorful history of early settlers ilves In Texas. Historical narratives about Denton are Included. The use of these kits has been expanded to others groups Who use them for display at historical events such as churches, meetings, etc. Well planned media advertising continues out of town and locally. A logo ad (see enclosed) IB used In newspapers, magazines, travel guides and other media. Out of state radio is also successful In directing tourists to the Courthouse. A recent special (20 minute) segment on the Museum, Courthouse, Campus and Fine Arts Theaters was arranged by Museum staff. The show was well done by Charley Orbison on Channel 2 in a prime Sunday night spot. The Denton Record Chronicle continues to provide local coverage as does Sammons Cable television. Media reporters are now i calling the Museum seeking stories about the history. The Museum Archives now furnishes photographs and histories for regular features in the Denton County Express. Through operational changes In the Museum's Collection Management and Archival Workshop in tho basement of the Courthouse, volunteers can work In groups to sort and catalogue documents, photographs and artifacts. Volunteers in this area are found visiting happilty with one another as they work on their special projects, The information tourist desk with brochure rack Is manned by trained w1untears. They are now provided with extensive materials to aid In helping visitors fins them planned destination. The volunteers help tourists who want to know what to visit In Dsrdon. They make use of brochures and maps to tell them about places to vish and things to see. Volunteers and staff are Wined to v.eet everyone who enters the oourt-W.'e rotunda or office with a cheery good morning, welcome to Denton[ How may t help ymr? Adult tours are being scheduled by out of town retirement cenws, ekferhostel programs, out of town chamber of commerce leadership groups, club women and convention planners. International tours are beginning to play a larger part in tourist --T r ~gendiiNa. Apendalt f oats visfls. DFW airport travelers with layover time are finding the Museum through travel guldes. This year the Museum Is a major listing for Denton In the Texas Tourist Guide distributed at each of Its tourist entry locations into Texas. With a picture if the Courthouse and an Interior picture of the Museum exhibit room, people tell us they found us in this book The book is also mailed to anyone who calls the 800 number for tourist informaW about Texas. This is advertised out of state. The Museum is featured In not less than eight privately published travel guides. A major contribtAlon to the daft' operation of the Museum are the volunteers, trustees, and community service workers, Volunteers operate the gin shop, provide tours, man the Information desk, work In the archives, help with exhibits, stuff mailers, input computer data and aid researchers, Community service workers are provided by the probation department after careful screening. These people are your neighbors and mine who are required to perform special service resulting from an Infraction of society's rules. They clean, Input computer data, file, type, man the Information desk as substitues, help with special events and provide hundreds of hours of work The Museum Is a major business. It requires a professional staff who Is enthusiastic, Interested and willing to work together. N requires hundreds of donated hours from Interested citizens. Currently, over 100 volunteers are carried on the Museum's i Volunteer Insurance. It requires a Board of Trustees who are willing and able to work together to guide a successful operation. The Museum requires adequate funding and i in-idnd services to continue fts expansion. The County d Denton, during Its test budget year provided an additional worker for the Museum and Historical Commission because of the vast Increase of work being rarded out on the first floor. The Commissioners Court continues to show its support of the work by providing In-ldnd services of space, utilities, phones, maintenance workers, equipment repair contracts, benefits for all workers, Inclusion in planning for special meetings coming to the city of Denton and in additional ways too numerous to list. The Museum programs have expended, visitor numbers continue to expand and we are proud to say that people are pleased with what they see, The Museum continues it cooperative efforts to provide help to all who seek to work with it The staff continues to reach out to other groups. We believe you will oontlnue to be pleased with the major accomplishments as the Museum continues to meet Its mission for the taxpayers. An of this could not be r. wplished without the lalor funds from the City of Denton. i t k r 1 4400 0 " Agodt Data 1994.1M BUDGET /9 of b63 INCOME V ~ 4.00 Labor Funds 59,000 8.00 Grant Funds 20,000 5.01 Texas Historical Commission 5.02 Denton Benefit League 5.03 Corporate Funding . 5.04 Government Grants.. 8.00 Donations ............................................................................3,000 8.01 Gift Shop I-,........ 8.02 Memorial Fund- 8,03 Private 7.00 Interest Income .....................................................................2 000 7.01 Moneymarket................................................ 7.02 Certificates of Deposits 7.03 Now Account... 7.04 Endowment a 9.00 Gift Shop Revenue 8,739. 8.01 Sales 9.00 Other Income ......................................................................3,000 9.01 Aduitworkshops........................................... 9.02 Children's works ~ hops 9.03 Special Events 9.04 User Fees INCOME TOTAL 96,739. EXPENSES 1.00E Salarles .....................................................................'..............38,139 1.01 E Director ...........................................25 26,458 1.02E Collection Management Assistant..... 12.881 t 2.00E Contract Labor 8,000 3.00E Student Labor 4,900 r J i 3.01 E Solari es ........................................3500. } 3.02E Workers Compensation 500. 3.wF FICA 400. 3.04E Withholding.., 400, 4.00E MembershlpslSubscriptlons .............................................900 4.01 E Museum Associations... 800. 4.02E Loral Arts Organizations 200 4.03E Professional Journals 100. 6.00E Professional Tralningi Tourism Promotions .12,900 5.01E Staff Training 800 I ; 5.02E Madre advertising ....................8000 ` j 5.03E Exhibitions............ 500 5.04E Specal promotions 500 6.06E Brochures..... 3000 8.00E Accounting Costs 4000 8.01E Bookkeeping 2500 8.02E Audit... . 900 8.03E SuPPlres 500 + 8.04E Government Reports 100 1 t i s AQegdaNo ACWAIR ate - a0ag 6 7.00E 8usiness Operations...... ..5,800. 7.01 E Supplies 300 7.02E Computer Equipment/supplies 350 7.03E InsuramA . 3800 7.04E Seca alM . . 250 7.05E Securi 8M 7.08E Bank Senate 8.00E Collection Managomorrt ...........9,000 8.01£ ArchMal Supplies 800 8A2E Presarv owrestoration projects.. 1700 8.03E Exhibit preparation 3000 8.04E Specia! Exhibits 1000 8.06E Consuaant Projecd 1500 8.08E Photography/phowgraph c68ectfon.1000 9.00E Educational Program .....2,800 9.01 E Workshops 500 9.02E Special Events. 700 9,03E Travel mileage...... ...........................800 9.04E Displays 800 9.05E School newsletters 10.00E VolunteerProgrem........................................ ........`.......................1,800 10.01 E Recruitment . 10,02E Recognition 450 10.03E Training 1.00E Gift mo10.04E Trusts* projects 450 6,800 11.01 E Supplies ,.........3500 11.02E Consignments ..............................2700 ? 11.03E Saks Tax 700 42.OOEContingencyFunds 3.000 ` r { e TOTAL EXPENSES 96,739. I i a 3 3 ~ t r 6 1 T¢R • ,4 1 ~ r ~ agendaNo 9'~ AgeadaH j Date 7-~ *1--2 j. w s DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM, INC. Financial Statements r" September 30, 1993 L~ f t r, 7 V~ x I. ~ , r 1 i 1M- _ 1 S 1! Ij4 5 k ~ \ A , •R I ■ ~ Y! ty i a 4 aNo a ~o~ AnandalfAm ► Data - ` w t i r1 Qt: r r .1 i E i rJ 3 4 r S a IgewaHo 9u"©a ~pertOaf; ' Oate ' a8RL7S rA I i° Table f Content Page 1'? it 12 Independent Auditors' Report . . . . . ' • • • • ' ' ' Jr Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Fund Balance - 3 r.~ Cash Basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Statement of Support, Revenue and Expenses - 4.5 Cash Basis . . ' • • • • ' • • • • . ' ' ' ' • ' 4i Statement of Changes in Fund Balance - 6 Cash Basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r,a . . . . . . 1 i Statement of Sources and Uses of Cash 8-10 l Notes to Financial Statements . . ~4 Supplementary information 1! r± Schedule of Changes in General Fixed Assets Y.+1 Combined Schedule of Revenues and Expenses 12 r~ Budget and Actual . . • • . y i J 1 { r i ~1 ti. MEMBERS MEMBERS TEARS SOCIETY OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFrED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS HANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, DEATON & TONN A ProhSSIOMI Corporation AciWoNo CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS - 902 NORTH LOCUST a P.O. BOX 077 Apsnddil M OENTON, TEXAS 76202-Ml 817387-8563 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ,w. Board of Directors Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. I., P. 0. Box 2184 Denton, TX 76202 We have audited the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities, and fund balances - cash basis of Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. (a nonprofit organization) as of September 30, 1993, and the related statements of support, iT revenue, and expenses - cash basis, of changes in fund balances - cash basis and statement of sources and uses of cash for the year then ended. These financial r~ statements are the responsibility of the Organization's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing I+ standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material ►r misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles csed and significant estimates made by r management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As described in Note 1, the Organization prepares its financial statements on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements except that the statements include prepaid insurance and a provision for depre.iation of equipment. This basis is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted i accounting principles. i In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, r~ in all material respects, the assets, liabilities, and fund balances of Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. as of September 30, 1993, and its support, revenue, and expenses, and the changes in its fund balances for the year then + ended, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1. I I, 1 1 i V , n 1 w- 1 P 9 ..a t 1 ' h' y d `I , e y+n `l4 T 5 3 ~pendaNo 9~l p~3 ' Age>aaiatt S _ Our audit eras conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial staUments taken as a whole. The supplemental schedules on pages 11 and 12 are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing +)rocedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Organization changed its method of accounting for fixed assets and depreciation. 1 w Hankiny, Power sl, East Q, Oeatow & Tonn A Professional Corporation Certified Public Accountants i May 20, 1994 1. r ff ~J if ~ i 2 J ( r 11ENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL MQSE M. 1NC. 4ger aNo q~ v q STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE ~lQ8*46M ` CASH BASIS oate,Z- 'g SEPTEMBER 3D, 1993 2 6 S General Operating Restricted Fixed Fund Funds- Assets Total _ r ASSETS Current Assets 3 50 Cash on hard - Gift Shop 520,187 20'787 239 Cash - Museum Acct. 239 Cash - Director's Acct. $20,360 20,360 Cash - Lalor Fund 10,839 1 1,839 1,769 Cash - Money Market 1,7B9 Cash - Endowment Fund 1,559 6,559 Cash - Memorial Fund 6,203 6,203 36 Certificate of Deposit 315 961 1.3 Prepaid Insurance 401052 23,160 53,162 i n Total Office Furniture and 518 19.578 Equipment, Net of $19, Depreciation (Note 4) r Total Assets $440,052 $23.11 0 S12,578 8S 2 0 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Current Liabilities S 21 $ 27 163 Payroll Taxes Payable 163 Sales Tax Payable 27 190 Total Current Liabilities ,_J-63 1. Fund Balances office Furniture and S19,578 19,578 Equipment 23,083 23,083 39 as4 ~ Restricted - napp 39 889 0 i g 82,5 Unappropriated 391889 23.083 19,8E - - fund Bal ance Total 7.11 1 Total Liabilities and p3 110 15 90 8S 2 Fund Balance 40 05~ i M,. f See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. 3 i i ~1 f r h DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM, INC. STATEMENT OF SUPPORT, REVENUES AND EXPENSES +peda CASH BASIS ;Deot~dalt FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 .late 7~` 7 r- General Operating Restricted Fixed Fund Funds Assets Total SUPPORT AND REVENUES Government Support r~ Hotel Occupancy Tax (Note 3) $57,280 $ 57,280 Work Study S 3,135 3,135 Public Support (Note 7) Grants 5,950 51950 Donations 837 1,799 2,636 ' Workshop Fees 964 964 Revenue Gift Shop 3,820 3,820 User fees 99 99 Interest 944 5 949 Miscellaneous 254 254 Total 16,003 59,0(s4 75,087 EXPENSES Directors' Salary 29,083 29,083 Educator's Salary 11,989 11,989 Work Study 1,161 1.754 2,915 r ; Payroll Taxes 1 666 667 Professional Training/ Tourism 671 954 1,625 Insurance 1,500 1,859 3,359 Accounting 11200 1,200 j Office Supplies 110 480 590 Bank Charges 22 68 90 Operating and Maintenance 151 248 399 Computer Accessories 13B 138 Membership/Subscriptions 175 75 250 Collection Management 458 1,179 1,637 Trustee's Pro,)ect 187 99 286 Education Workshops 412 143 $55 Travel 42 42 Preservation/Restoration 804 277 11081 Miscellaneous 200 200 Docent/Volunteer Program GO 60 Exhibit Supplies 885 1,057 1,942 Gift Shop Consignment 518 663 1,181 Gift Shop supplies 459 1,104, 11573 Grant Participation 6,151 1,099 7,250 Office Furniture and Equipment 320 902 1,222 Depreciation S 6,535 6,"35 Total 14,237 55,097 6,535 75,869 d I DENTON QU TY HISTORICAL MUSEUM. INC. wdsNo. q y w 1 STATEMENT OF SUPPORT, REVENUE AND EXPENSES (CONTINUEAQefldall / CASH BASIS Date FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 6 g i General I' ~s I i Operating Restricted Fixed fund Funds Assets Total N Excess of Support and Revenue Over Expenses Before Capital 1,766 3,981 _(_.6,_535) ~jB2) Additions - k Capital Additions 6,819 fi,819 Grant Participation 1.222 1,222 92/93 Budget 8.041 8.041 ie Excess of Support and Revenue r~ Over Expenses After Capital 7666§ 3 87 S 1.506 $ 7,~259 Additions S 1, 7 J , Irk 1 N 4 i J ` r. I iI M 5 ,J +i See Accompanying Note4 to Financial Statements. ~ S j . , k x DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM, INC. VadrtNo r• STATEMENT Of CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 14wal `s CASH BASIS r)au y " FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 b r• it General r+ Operating Restricted Fixed Fund Funds As -Total wy Beginning Balance $35,263 $21,956 542,498 S 99,717 October 1, 1992 Excess of Support and Revenue g Over Expenses After Capital 1,766 3,987 1,506 7,259 f Additions Adjustment for Prior Years Depreciation (24,426) (24,426) Fund Transfers 2.860 1?) Ending Balance 319578 8Z.550 September 30, 1993 39 889 $223 3.• ,0088 „ i 3 i I See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. r 3 S i~. DENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM, INC, 40VONo STATEMENT OF SOURCES ANO USED OF CASH ~gendalt FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Ate r' SOURCES Of CASH Excess of Support and Revenue over s (782} r. expenses before Capital Additions Capital Additions 8.041 " Excess of Support and Revenue over expenses after Capital Additions 7,259 Depreciation 6,535 Increase in Sales Tax Payable 6 Decrease in Prepaid Insurance 38 Total Sources of Cash 13.838 USES Of CASH Fixed Assets Purchased 8,041 Decrease in Payroll Tax Payable 18 Total Uses of Cash 8'222 Increase in Cash ~J i i I w J ~ W i See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. 7 r I ~ a s i r 1. OENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL muSFUM INC ~nn gendsNo NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 'Oendalluff SEPTEMBER 3D, 1993 1PO -7_ I Note I Significant Accounting Policies The accounts of the Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. are organized on the basis of a accountingfentity ndThe account eachhfund are accounted for with a separate „ set of self-balancing accounts that compose its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures. In the financial statements in this report, the various funds are grouped into the following fund types and categories: General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating fund of the Museum. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Occupancy Tax collected by herCitysoftDentonrandnIt istto betusedofor the operations of the Museum. Fixed, Assets - Fixed assets used in fund type operations (general fixed assets) are accounted for in the General Fixed Assets Account Group. All fixed assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cast is not available. Donated fixed assets are valued at their estimated fair value on the date donated (see Note 4). Basis of are^~~ntilaa The Organization's policy is to prea its financial statements on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements re Consequently, certain revenue and the related assets are recognized when received rather than when earned, and certain expenses, except for depreciation and preai insurance, are recognized when paid rather than when the obligation is incurred. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statement are not intended to present J ! financial position and results of operations in conformity with accepted accounting principles, generally Note 2 Legally Incorporated Entity I~ The Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. was founded on May 6, 1977. The Museum was legally incorporated in the State of Texas on April 19, 1979. j Exemption status under Section 501(c)(3) was obtained on March 27, 1980. i I P 1 i I ~ i l E 8 i I 6 T a 1 y ~ z S DENTTON COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM, INC. ipendaNo_ QUO NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) {AOndatt .S' SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 late a Note 3 - Hotel/Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenue Hotel/motel room occupancy tax is collected by the City of Denton. The City of Denton allocates a portion of the total hotel/motel revenue to the Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. The total received by the Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. for the year are as follows: Quarter ended December 31, 1992 S 13,947 i. Quarter ended March 31, 1993 12,852 Quarter ended June 30, 1993 12,517 r. Quarter ended September 30, 1993 17,964 5 The amount received during the quarter ended September 30, 1993 includes $1,612 due from the Foundation for September 30, 1990. Note 4 - 3eneral Fixed Ar~ets All fixed assets are recorded at cost or at estimated fair market value, except as noted in a separate paragraph, at the date of gift. z Over the life of the Museum, organizations have donated various furniture and equipment witnuut submitting a market value. The Museum, as the donee, is unable to objectively value a gift and therefore, has not placed a value on these items. The majority of furniture and equipment, however, is recorded. Effective October 1, 1992 the Organization began recording depreciation of fixed assets in the financial statements, using the straight line method over the J estimated useful life. Because or this change the Organization recorded all } prior years depreciation resulting in an entry to Fund Balance for $24,426. The following is a summary of fixed assets at September 30, 1993: , Office furniture and equipment $30,169 Other equipment 20,370 50,539 Less accumulated depreciation 30 961) Fixed Assets net $19,57 8 I w 9 i y C' ,r 1 rv uscmRTgAE MUSEUM.INC. DENTON CDU~u - 4aendaNo Y, NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) Agendaft SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 to 6-5 Nye 5_Collections in conformity with the practice followed by many museums, donated collections are not included in the balance sheet. It is impracticable to value these gifts, placed on i these items items. cataloged in therefore, of they are not ta no z value h is newly-acquired 15 ' r Nose 6 Donated Services and Facilities The value of donated services is not reflected in the accompanying financial statements since there is not objective basis available by which to measure the have donated value of such ' significant amounts of their However, tobthenDenton number County of Historical volunteers Museum, Inc. r+ at Note i - Public Support and Revenue r+ All contributions are considered to be available for unrestricted use unless specifically restricted by the donor. 5 -a t 5 , FI ~a { I ~ I I I I 10 . 1 i, 1 p i k { l pENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM, INC. 9MNO +gendai ~eiits' / SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 1aie - FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 Balance Balance 3 9/30/92 Additions Depreciation 9/30/9 General Fixed Assets: 169 Office Equipment $22,128 S 8,041 $30 r $ (6,535) (6$35) Other gare Depreciation 20,370 20o370 Current Ye 169 Adjustment for Prior _2i,4 6) 2( 4,426) Years Depreciation Total 4i2 _498 £,8,041 35f1 bl) $19.578 investment In General Fixed Assets Provided from; S 4,611 General Fund $11,251 S I,222 S (7,862) Donations (Note 4) 31.247 6.819 21 3.) 14,967 Total 4U 498 $ 8.041 3${ 95 1„9 78 I I j t f , ) v -,r i ~t See Accompany Notes to Financial Statements. ~ 11 F s f ! ' i {S{ i DENT0 , BOUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM, INC. ~gendaNo - Am SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION agendalt lot COMBINED SCHEDULE Of REVENUES AND EXPENSES ~kta ` CASH BASIS A* 6-9 BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 r Variance Favorable Actual _ Budget (Unfavorable) r, Revenues: Hotel Occupancy Tax $ 57,280 S 50,000 $ 7,280 Grants 5,950 6,500 (550) Work Study 3,135 5,820 (2,685) r Donation 2,636 1,100 1,536 ft Shop 3,820 5,200 (1,380) GiInterest 949 11015 (364) Workshop Fees 964 600 User Fees 99 250 (254) Miscellaneous 254 S ,087 r. Total Revenues 7 7~ 0,545 S 4.542 Expenses: S 29,083 $ 20,864 S (8,219) Directors' Salary 11 984 14,180 2,191 Educator's Salary 2,915 8,231 5,316 Work Study Salaries 667 1,150 483 Payroll Taxes 275 Professional Training/Toursim 1, 1,900 641 Insurance 3,3359 59 4,000 Legal and Accounting 1,200 1,100 (100} 1 Office Supplies 590 320 ((70) Bank Charges 500 101 Operation and Maintenance 399 312 - Computer Accessories 138 450 50 Membership/Subscriptions 250 300 1,631 19800 163 Collection management 286 1,250 964 Trustees' Projects 400 345 f Education Workshops 555 458 42 500 Travel Preservation/Restoration 1,28010 1,500 (200) Miscellaneous 60 800 740 Docent/Volunteer Program f 1,942 2,000 58 Exhibits 619 Gift Shop Consignments 1,181 10600 1,573 1,500 7 (73) Gift Shop Supplies , Grant Participation 1250 ( ,250) ' Fixed Assets 1,222 (1,222) Depreciation 6,535 (6,535) Consultants 1,500 1,500 Contingency 2,000 2,000 Reserve, Savings 1,500 1~S00 Sates Tax 500 Total Expenditures 75, 7545 5 3 4) See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements. 12 y 4s.' . +gendaHo u"© Agendafi S t>iate 7' ° ' 06 P~ f , M t i 1. i 3 T , 4r +oanda<No~9u'©~ AWgadalt Fiscal Year Plan 1995 (1994-95) Date As is true almost everywhere, funding at and from the state level is dwindling. Texas currently ranks dead last among the fifty states in funding for the arts at 91 cents per capita per year. GDAC is and will continue to experience ever greater cut backs from the state for the foresecabie future, For example, Texas Commission on the Arts has made more than a 20% cut in funding from just the past fiscal year (FY 94 funding was $10,625). GDAC has been reduced to 1990.91 support levels with more cuts on the horizon. (TCA support given in FY 93 was $18,373 and FY 92 was $16,250.) The hardest hit area is in support for subgranting to member organizations which has been completely cut from this year's award. Out of a total of $70,000 in three areas requested, GDAC will receive only $8,494 in two categories. The support the GDAC receives from the hotel/motel tax from the City of Denton is now critical to our ability to proceed with programs and planning. Currently, GDAC's share of the Lalor Funds is 14.28% or approximately $70,000. While we are very capable of doing some focused fund raising for specific items, such as subgranling and projects/programs, the support the GDAC receives from the hotel/motel revenues makes it possible for us to serve our constituencies, our member organizations and our community as a whole. It will become more important in the future for the GDAC to work in close association and partnership with the Denton Convention & Visitor Bureau to insure that we are assisting in attracting people and business into the city of Denton through the programming we can offer and through the quality of life we can ensure to the community. It is in this way the Greater Denton Arts Council can and does make a valuable contribution to the city and her residents throughout the entire fiscal year. The GDAC also has a vital role to play in the Vision 2000 project not only as a resource but as a key participant as was true in Rock Hill, SC (please see attached ad slick from Rock Hill). 1. Mission of Greater Denton Arts Council - The Council was founded in 1967 to develop the creative awareness of the citizens of this community through participation, encouragement and i support of all the arts. { II. 1993.94 Fiscal Year Highlights ~-J A. Campus Theatre. - Campaign and Renovation: GDAC is very proud to say that with the support of the city, we have been able to raise all but $380,000 of the $1.625 million necessary from local sources both public acid private. We had a signed contract for the renovation on July 1 and work has already begun. The contractor (Steele-Freeman of Fort Worth) has given us an anticipated completion of 270 calendar days. B. Center for the Visual Arts Completion of the renovation of east wing and new East Gallery occurred in July 1993.(Exhibidons in East Gallery:O'Neil Ford-A Retrospective, North Texas Area Art League President's Show, Paper People, The Graphic Work of Leonard Baskin, The Big Picture-Large Format Watercolor, Treasures from Indonesia--Exhibitions in Meadows Gallery: The Big Picture: Large Scale Watercolor, The North Texas Area Art League 1994 Awards Exhibition, Zuni Sunlight: Paintings by Frank Reed Whiteside, On My Own Time, Materials: Hard and Soft, The Arts Guild Auction for the Arts, Suspended Animation: Art from Cartoons) 1. Regular Annual Programs a. Matc~ials: Hard & Soft Approximately 240 entries were juried by local artist and educator Dr. Georgia Leach Gough. We were especially honored to have :rad the ~peedeNo 3 Ap*lt ale 7 founder of the national fine crafts exhibit jury this year's show. 3 4~ b. Holiday Show and Performance - Continuation of Family Perform Yng Arts Series sponsored by Target. The Puppet shows were on December 29, January 29 and February 13 and included performances by Peeler-Rose Productions, Chameleon Puppet Theatre and Harms Marionettes who performed in both English and Spanish. c. On My Own Time There were seven corporations and institudons participating in this annual local juried exhibit for the employees of Denton area companies. The categod,a in this show include photography, drawing, painting, textiles, sculpture, crafts and graphic design. d. Classes & Workshops included silk painting, watercolor with Rob Erdle, quilting with Barbara Hartman, ceramics, drawing and painting C. Memberships 1. We have added 91 new individual members for a total of 513. 2. Our Business/Corporadon gain has been 15 new members for a total of 54. D. New Executive Director ill. FY 95 A primary focus shall be placed on strategic planning for the future and how to take advantage of and work directly with changes occurring in Denton and community. GDAC anticipates this process to begin in the fall. A. Campus Theatre 1. Renovation Anticipated completion will be sometime in late spring or early summer of 1995 so that occupancy and programming can occur for fall of '95 2. Encore Campaign Due to increased construction costs, GDAC must raise additional $125,000 to $150,000. Avenues are currently being pursued for private and foundation monies to complete funding for renovations. 3. Programming for fall, FY 96 a. Community Performing Arts Organization scheduling b. Outside Arts programming by GDAC and others c. Non arts related rentals and marketing B. Center for the Visual Arts 1. Renting and Marketing Festival Hall (Large muhi use area in CVA)- preparing greater rental availability for not arts related use of facility will require a ~ordinated marketing plan, quality execution and follow through; focused efforts will have to be made to ensure the j highest level of rent usage possible 2. The Meadows Gallery a. increasing participation in Materials: Hard & Soft; On My Own rime b. long range programming both in house generated & tours 3. The East Gallery a. acquire furnishings and computer hard/software for docents of.ice b. develop programming and rental (marketing to local/regional artists) 4. Classes/workshops/programming - focus on workshop orientation for classes 5. On My Own Time will begin pursuing corporations and institutions much sooner this year in order to provide more preparation time for the businesses and to encourage much more wide spread participation by area employers. C. Arts in Education 1. Denton Independent School District - develop cooperative plan to provide arts ra ~psadaNo - 2 +tgendaltertt~ on continual basis rather than just through artist residencies and special performances .4 g~W 2. Work with Texas Woman's University 3. Work with University of North Texas - School of Music, School of Visual Arts & Getty Institute, other colleges and departments D. Services for Community and Affiliate Organizations 1. Maintain central mailing lists 2. Technical assistance 3. Develop & maintain calendar with DCVB; one will have master, the other will have updated copy on weekly basis E. Cottage and Administration 1. Paint exterior of Cottage; install blinds and drapes in necessary offices 2. Assess need and acquire specific office equipment - new copier, fax machine, computer hardware such as new/additional laser printer, phone system? It seems that we are hitting the point at which office equipment must be replaced and/or have major repairs. 3. Raise local & regional visibility (national through Materials: Hard & Soft) 4. Develop cooperative relationships with regional arts agencies to take advantage of programming and resource options 5. Develop general fund development strategies including endowment 6. Bus tours - Establish network with Metroplex arts institutions and arrange continuing series of bus tours to special events, performances and exhibits both day and evening F. Membership and Development 1. Increase membership numbers on the individual/family level and on corporate 2. Begin study of other potential sources, acquix information and actively pursue; identify programs and projects that would be eligible for foundation and corporate funding LJ .d, F~. Y A , l l r y w ~ r GREATER DENTOM AA?/ COUNCIL jo8nd8 1V0 CrEAATINQ BUDGET W • 1696 - 1995 4peralt '-S Date .._70 4 6_ I• EAE10oa McCrt BODGIT 63-94 ACTUAL IULOET 66.95 (as of June 30) A. IALID 1. Concessicas/Drinks 11200 7SS 11200 i 2. Sales Art/Aelatod (Non-concsnion) 11000 21139 1,000 Misc, MerchaDdles 0 0 0 'I 1. AENTAL 1. center for the visual Arts IrI studio) 21,000 161237 17,500 Miscellaneous 0 30 2. 'mast Binl (studios, showcases) 500 Use 11000 C, ADMI/IIOMl1fEE 3. Adalssioas Incomes (performeinq arts/ezb.) 750 712 900 2. Tuition [workshops/classed 100 2117 1,000 3. service feet 120 290 620 I 4. Materials, Bard 4 /oft 94 51200 61595 5,100 5. CARA 21000 41116 21000 j S. on my Own Tice 3,600 11020 11600 7. *us Tours 2,000 0 2,00D r 0. rUMDAAINnn IMCO6a 1. /pedal Events 3,500 31500 1,500 BARBED MORN TOTAL 39,670 40,161 35,020 11. UMBkABID 221COM BUDGET 91-94 ACTUAL 6110 BUDGIT 9495 A. BOTBL/MDTIL t1vm= 70,101 10,976 71,000 I'B. OOV'T GRAYMMOXIE! 1. TCA 10,625 10,965 1,494 3. Local (Area) 3,oil 21216 3,041 ~ other 0 0 0 t C, 0ROABIIA920MAL OAAB1'E ' f 1. TAO 27,000 29,000 25,000 2. Other 0 O 0 E 0. r00MDAT10101 1,000 0 3,000 I B. CORSORATB D0 I1011//0 Woolu II9/ 1,200 4,23D 51700 1. I1t01VIDOkL 41729 350 217 350 t O. M ncoxmir ` 1. indlvidoal 16,000 19,913 19,000 2. orOa3isational 11500 41150 41000 2. Business 13,500 9,200 12,500 i B. 33rnmaT INC010 /DO 619 900 2 . 3tBylilml/ RBnO07tB0(I31TE 900 11141 11000 i~ a. 141MLLAMBOU! a 24 0 1. OROA112IATICBAL Tom" 0 0 0 ~ UmauffliD 2DOOM TOTAL 3501024 153,261 153,992 s,t TOTAL L%Nm 116,694 191,422 149,012 !ADS 1 D1 d I0041-95 B0 m" ArrBOVAL DAA" All,° ' t 2. ADtt2R28TMT1141 SMSER BUDGET 03-94 ACTUAL 6/70 bUDOET 93-94 A. PEEfON61L 1. salary (lull time) 75,000 66,111 7S,S00 1. salary (Datt time) 7,500 10,917 11,265 3. Nick 6,364 11113 Coll 4. Nadical Ineutance 9,237 7,793 9,507 S. Retirement 11500 11500 Soo 6. Workman's CCW 11000 966 11000 7. Mileage reimbursement 700 700 700 S. Esee. Director's esyenea 600 711 Soo 9. Traiains/Career Development 200 53 $':0 10. scarcb 0 6727 0 a. CONTRACT LA101 620 431 C. VOLUNT31R8 1. Docent program 750 97 !SO board Noluntesrs 200 96 200 i D. CO6NRRENCI1TRAVEL 0 S1/ Soo ADKMOTRATM 5709181 TOTAL 104,665 101,177 107,060 e is. OPIRATIEO M."noL bUD08T 93-94 ACTUAL 4/30 NUOOST 94-95 A. MICE MPLIES 1,700 116 11100 f. RETAIL 1. beverages 11100 11129 11100 7. 1larrbendiee (Commission) 517 1,711 500 C. rEL1PE01E 31500 2,147 31600 D. COPrn fUPPL2Ef//EAVICE 600 527 600 f. POSTA01 906 750 900 j r. EOORA, RVISCRIPTIORf 350 576 $50 It 0. PRovessrumal. adowel9s Soo 755 700 E. O"ICE E00z"a" 0 loo 0 ) 1. COW 7M Ennis 300 415 Soo I J. 13MIUAAMCI 9,5000 S,S60• 51000 E. AUDIT 7,600 11600 31600 iI L. CEECESEOIDA= CEAAOEf SO 49 100 M. OP. 11200. 150 S to ! S o - 0P1RAma Ennis TOTAL 19,637 20,955 17,000 i L ~Mo aN~ 3 PAGE P 0.' 4 1PP4-PP 80=7 0 ~ j APPROVAL DRAPr rl,I L 1 p r III. PACILITIBS B7IpwN9s BVDOBT 9]-9/ ACTUAL f130 BUDOBT 93-94 A. VICTGAIAM COTTAOB 1. Maintenance too 909 2. rarnitora-/fixtures 700 )DO 91 )00 a. CBMnR POR Tu VISUAL AxT3 1. iuildina Repair/Maintenaace 11500 2. Janitorial/suildiag supplier 1,]00 1,590 11500 3. M4cb1nerY/Bq%1FW1t 400 1,163 1,300 1. furnsahiage/fisturu 500 214 400 5. Rental security 653 7DO 6. Deposit Refnnd 115Soo 00 116 600 3,250 3,504 C. ARTS COMPLB:T (Carpus Theatre) 0 31 p t D. OROUtma AND PROPBR7Y I 1. wstan inator 650 542 650 OroundsRuping 1,000 3, !]1 3. Building sec;SLY 000 11000 t. 1C. tt. MI*=" 416 Soo S. Misc. 0 0 125 0 + PACILITIBS BTPBMas TOTAL 15,150 111496 14,275 F N. PROORANS/SBRVZCBS wxPSMSS DUDOBT l3-94 ACTUAL i/30 SUDOBT 91-95 A. MEADOWS QMAXRT 1. Xeadcwa wxhlbitions 3400 31320 31500 2. But Gallery wshiblticas 1,500 21233 1,500 1 Permanent Collection 0 Materials ward 6 Soft 93 61573 6,577 0 4. Materials ward a soft It 1,500 11161 7,000 S. Materials ward 'a soft !S S,f00 6. Ishibitica "lies 120 4$ 110 I ~I R. I]OOp•' iiJ10J. I 1. Newsletter 1,300 652 1,200 1 3. Informational Publications ISO 0 250 R:4:?.r1oMAL J L All Program 11000 21637 1150.) . 1. Otber SSddueational 0 frograau 19 0 0 SS 100 1. Psrformiag Arts !vents 11700 11461 11600 2. ot my Own T 1x700 11I13 3 aped Touze 11300 1,600 0 1,600 R. ADVOCACT AM RBCOMaTION 2. CARA 11450 3,697 2. Advocacy 300 134 3,000 300 P. GRAM PROGRAM 22,100 201955 23.900 O. x=0 w =xP 1+100 Collage) 1. Membership drive 21100 21133 2. Misc. Membership 100 31400 77 100 3.036 1,000 PROORAMS/sBRVICms npxu d TOTAL 11,157 50,930 50,060 TOTAL wBPmxns ' 119,334 19 c, 116 11/,315 PACs 3 or t Qbviso ' M01-rs sum APP WM DAA" ~QbilQal 1J~ r ¢ r' I 1 e ~pandaNo q~ -OR3 1 Agenda! ~ Eoauxx I~1a ' 9 EOD01T 93-94 ACTUAL 6/30 XnQIT 94.9sgN6 income Named 39,470 30,373 Zsca.e Unearned 150,024 125,491 1515,020 1,994 Income Total 169,614 156,271 119,01E fsyease Administrative 104,laS 66,243 tzieae• operatlaQ 19,137 11,{{0 7107,060 7,000 Rimetu facilities 151150 tspena* frotrame 49,757 300,.5577 53 11,77$ fxpesa• Totals 199,224 101060 165,110 101195 (S,9I2) 6) t OAAC zolerve malanceer 7/3/11 113,131 f( 7/1/E9 43,150 YAM 45,116 711/!1 $0,630 } 7/1/92 57,143 I 711/93 43,994 (projected) 711116 43,011 (projected) 7/1/95 y. I i { PAN 4OP 9 7114-03 MOC411 APPAO AL ORAL! ~gcnd,No. q~l - ~l3 Wrs 7' 141 44 WHERE ADT IS UPLIFTING BUSINENS Symbolizing commit- landscaping. ment to the highest, qualities In addition, Rock Ifil1s of art and business, "Empowering The Rock [fill, SC, is j Vision" strategic creating the plan calls for a new regions boldest multi-purpose Arts public artwork. A Centre at the heart new Gateway Plaza of the city. Perform- will soon mark the ` anccs and exhibits entrance into the wLl enliven the city and Into central Lusiness Tech Park, a pre- district year-round. miere business ) Let Rock park, on Dave Lyle !fill uplift your Boulevard just off business. Call the I-77. Historic Rock Ifill Econom- Masonic Temple col- is Development umns w111 rise 60 Corporation at feet above large 803-329-7090. life-like sculp- ,a tHiu, SC ures and elaborate RoCIM , DG ON Tills lk;ADINGAr)1N(; IsUGE r , xry, AAeadeko 4 ~ ~ Apendal I A44 C G,EALR DElITOR ARTS t0UNQ1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT i JUNE 30, 1993 ~a s j{ { 1. ~ 1 v r i t No q -0 3 Apendal Otte GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNCIL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT JUNE 30, 1993 _J i i a ~ S { VWaNo. 9~ •Od13 4genda~t ~ Date q6*6 43 g 4 N 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Basic Financial Stu cments ~i Independent Auditors' Report 1 as Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Fund Balances (Cash Basis) 2 tatement of Receipts, Disbursements 3 4 and Uianges in Fund Balances (Cash Basis) 5-7 Notes to Financial Statements "F Supplementary Information «a Independent Auditors' Report F+ on Supplementary Information 9 ~J 3 Statement of Receipts and Disbursements: The Arts Guild.......... 10 1 as MEMBERS MEMBERS TEXAS SOGETY OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF M CERTIFIED PUOLPC ACCCLVANTS CERTIFIED PUDLIC ACCOJ%TANTS IiANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, E)EATON & TONN ,ne i A Professional Corporation VoiNo. 3 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 902 NORTH LOCUST A P.O. BOX 977 A}I DENTON, TEXAS 76202-0977 t 617-387$563 ~1~ " T 76~ 63 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Board of Directors Greater Denton Arts Council Denton, Texas We have audited the accompanying statement of assets, liabilities and fund balances (cash basis) of the Greater Denton Arts Council (a nonprofit organization) as of June 30, 1993, and the related statement of receipts, disbursements and changes in fund balances (cash basis) for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Council's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As described in Note 1, the Council prepares its financial statements on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements except the statements include a provision for depreciation of fixed assets. This basis is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the assets, liabilities and fund balances of the Greater Denton Arts Council as of June 30, 1993, and its receipts, disbursements, and the changes in its fund balances for the year then ended, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1. DQ 44:y~ Hankins, Powers, Eastup, Deaton & Tonn A Professional Corporation Certified Public Accountants j September 6, 1993 I_ 3 gooda No ~ ageodallerrL GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNCIL ate 7- q STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES N 6 (CASH BASIS) JUNE 30, 1993 +t Fixed General Building Assets v Fund Fund Fund TOTAL ASSETS p Cash in banks - GOAC S 3,670 $ 9,165 $ 129835 } Investments (Note 2) GOAC 47,480 3079154 354,634 Investments (Note 2) - TAG 38,240 38,240 Land, buildings 6 equifiment at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $208,314 $1.305.593 31, 05,593 TOTAL ASSETS BS 9,390 31$6.319 S_3, 0 $1,711,302 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Escrow for Utilities S 2,327 $ 2,327 Fund Balances S89.390 313,992 11,305.593 1,708,975 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES 89,390 $316,319 $1,305,593 71 0 l I fu 'N _s The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. 2 a Y . GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNCIL 40" No - i STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS AND CHANGES w tB 0 IN FUND BAIANCES (CASH BASIS) ~ FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1993 yQ~ s Fixed General Building Assets .-Fund Fund Fund TOTAL Receipts: R Membership support - dues f 33,952 S 33,952 Other contributions 10,308 $ 44,332 54,640 y Hotel/Motel tax 62,513 629bu) Grants 26,140 263I40 Rental of facilities 1:9694 159694 Program receipts 15,14 15,140 Fundraising 25,120 25,120 Commission ri on sale of art 490 490 Interest on investments 2,711 13,760 169411 Other receipts 4.21 622 4.837 Total Receipts 396,283 58,714 .0- 254,997 Disbursements: a Grants 20,931 20931 Program expense 26,755 26,755 Fundraising 7 ,851 24,562 32,413 Salaries and contract labor 899321 8,205 91,526 ' Payroll tax 6,111 548 71259 Medical insurance 8,112 89112 Travel and expense account 11587 231 1,818 Membership and newsletter 41400 4,400 Rt Insurance 5,683 5,683 Janitorial expense 1,013 ' Maintenance and repairs 5,882 5,882 Telephone 1,673 11673 Professional fees 20500 2,500 Postage 661 408 1,069 N Office supplies 3.251 3,561 6 812 Dues and subscriptions 604 0C04 Miscellaneous 1,296 3,165 4,461 Artist-in-Education Program 5,837 5,837 Depreciation ~,i _ 28.639 Total Disbursements 194,068 409680 28,638 263,386 'Y i 7 V 3 i ,i . r; r t M i GREATER DENTOH ARTS COUNCIL VwdaN0 a►Dend~......._ STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS AND CHANGES O18 IN FUND BALANCES (CASH BASIS) - CONTINUED 446 FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1993 v 4 ` r Fixed w General Building Assets Fund Fond fP~~ TOTAL Excess Receipts over Disbursements S 29215 $ 18,034 $ (28,638) $ (8,389) Fund Transfers (50000) 51000 Fund Balances, July 1, 1992 92,175 421,537 1,383,328 1,897,040 Fixed Asset Additions (130,579) 130,579 Prior Period Accumulated Depreciation Adjustment (119,676) (179.676) Fund Balances, June 30, 1993 g9.390 $313,992 1 3O5 593 $1,708,975 i r tt~ ..3 t The accompanying note: are an integral part of this statement, "s 4 y b; S . GREATER DENTON ARTS COiNCIL NJKdaNo 9 3 Agendilt NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Dale 6 a JUN 39 1993 1 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The financial statements of the Greater Denton Arts Council (GDAC) have been prepared on the cash basis of accounting except the statements include a provision for depreciation of fixed assets. Coasequently, certain revenues are recognized when + received rather than when earned, and certain expenses and purchases of assets are recognized when cash is disbursed rather than when the obligation is incurred. Financial statements prepared on this basis of accounting are not intended to present financial position and results of operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The accounts of the Council are maintained in accordance with the principles of fund accounting. This is the procedure by which resources for various purposes are classified for accounting and reporting purposes into furf% established according to their nature and purposes. The assets and fund balances of the Council are reported in three self-balancing fund groups as follows: - General fund, representing the portion of resources available for support of operations; # - duilding fund, representing the portion of resources restricted for construction, improvements, and other facilities-related Expenditures; . Fixed asset fund, accounting for the cost of all capital-related expenditures, major donated capital items, and depreciation. The financial statements of the Greater Denton Arts Council include the activity of The Arts Guild (TAG), a member organization. An auction held annually by TAG provides the primary source of fundraising for :he Arts Council. Transactions between the two entities have been eliminated for presentation in the basic financial statements. The activity of TAG (including transactions with the Arts Council) is presented separately in the supplementary information section of this report. The organization is exempt from federal income taxes under Section 501 (c) (3) `I1 of the internal rovenue code. ~Ga NOTE 2 - INVESTMENTS f►i The Council's investments consist of money market accounts and certificates of deposit, as follows: i e !titerest Fund- Amount y a i Tvne _ _P ai& Group $ 47,480 N/A Money Market 2.65% GDAC $ 41044 N/A NOW Account 2.50% TAG f 3,954 N/A Money Market 2.50% TAG $ 260 N/A Money Market 2.50% TAG $ 29,982 03-05.94 C.D. 3.25% TAG $ 9,944 N/A Money Market 2.50% Building f 2,386 N/A Money Market 2.50% Building i r GREATER DENTO-N-ARTS COUNCIL Ageodalt NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEEENTS Date JUNE 50, 93 6 NOTE I - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The financial statements of the Greater Denton Arts Council (GDAC) have been prepared on the cash basis of accounting except the statements includa a provision for depreciation of fixed assets. Consequently, certain revenues are recognized when received rather than when earned, and certain expenses and purchases of assets are recognized when cash is disbursed rather than when the obligation is incurred. Financial statements prepared on this basis of accounting are not intended to present financial position and results of operations it, accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The accounts of the Council are maintained in accordance with the principles of fund accounting. This is the procedure by which resources for various purposes are classified for accounting and reporting purposes into funds established according to their nature and purposes. The assets and fund balances of the Council are reported in three self-balancing fund groups as follows: iS - General fund, representing the portion of resources available for support of operations; . Building fund, representing the portion of resources restricted for construction, improvements, and other facilities - related expenditures; - Fixed asset fund, accounting for the cast of all capital-related +7 expenditures, major donated capital items, and depreciation. The financial statements of the Greater Denton Arts Council include the activity ►iF of The Arts Guild (TAB), a member organization. An auction held annually by TAG e provides the primary source of fundraising for the Arts Council. Transactions between the two entities have been eliminated for presentation in the basic financial statements. The activity of TAG (including transactions with the Arts Council) is presented separately in the supplementary information section of this report. The organization 1s exempt from federal income taxes under Section 501 (c) (3) (a of the internal revenue code. 11 NOTE 2 - INVESTMENTS ° The Council's investments consist of money market accounts and certificates of deposit, as follows: " Interest Fund- Amount Maturity Type Rate Group $ 479480 N/A Money Market 2.65% GDAC ~y f 41044 N/A NOW Account 2.50% TAG $ 3,954 N/A Money Market 2.50% TAG $ 260 N/A Money Market 2.50% TAG S 29,982 03-05.94 C.D. 3.25% TAG S 9,944 N/A Money Market 2.50% Building $ 29386 N/A Money Market 2150% Building 5 4gaiidtNo ' ! GREATER DENTON ARTS COUNQ AQa~al / NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-CONTINUED Date ' JUNE 30, 1993 NOTE 2 - INVESTMENTS (continued) Interest Fund- Amount Maturity Type Rate Group $ 25,000 11-17-93 C.D. 2.90% Building $1000000 07-23.93 C.O. 2.80% Building S 20113 06.15.94 C.O. 3.15% Building " $ 67,711 09-0943 C.D. 2.75% Building $100,000 09-06.93 C.D. 3.10% Building N NOTE 3 - FIXED ASSETS a Following is a summary of the Council's fixed assets: Buildings and improvements S 946,354 Land 218,750 Construction in progress 231,317 Furniture and equipment 54,121 Permanent art collection 63.365 1,513,907 Less: Accumulated depreciation ) 351 Fixed assets are recorded at cost. Depreciation of fixed assets is recorded in the financial statements, using the straight line method over the estimated useful life. The cost of the buildings and improvements includes expenditures of the Council to renovate the Center for the Visual Arts. This building currently houses an art ~J gallery, rehearsal hall, reception hall and studios. The cost also includes the donation and renovation of the Victorian Cottage, which houses the administrative offices. In 1990 the Council purchased the Campus Theatre at a cost of $100,778 which is also included in buildings and improvements. The cost of the land represents the appraised value, as of January, 1983, of land donated to the Council by Newton Rayzor. The Council owns a one-half interest in a 35-acre tract of land located by Loop 288. The construction in progress represents architect fees and contractor fees for the J. N. Rayzor Center for the Performing Arts and the Campus Theatre. The total construction cost is estimated to be in excess of $1,700,000 for the J. N. Rayzor Center. Completion of this project is contingent upon the sale of the land described above. The art collection is valued at the approximate market value of the donated items at the date they were given. The collection consists primarily of works valued at $600 or less. However, the collection also includes three sculptures donated to the Council by the Meadows foundation. These items comprise approximately two-thirds of the value of the collection. 6 +apei~a No IG "TER DENTON ARTS LQM11 Agen NOTES TO FINANCIAL 30A EM NTS-CONTINUED t54 ff~ 1 C ■ NOTE 4 - COMMITMENTS On September 1, 1981, the Council entered into a 25-year lease agreement with the City of Denton for two buildings. These building are the present Center of the Arts Visual minimum dofh$1 future the use of the buildi gs.erThe City pays aTportioncof ~ pays a the operational expenses. w NOTE 5 - ADJUSTMENTS TO FUND BALANCE The fixed Asset fund balance was restated to show depreciation of Fixed Assets W in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounti n eSdtanbdyards No. 93, al o coonting D .e~~.tion by Not For Profit aani Standards Board. The adjustment Orreflects accumulated depreciation of $179,676 as o July 1, 1992. ,I I 7 i t_. p'1 7 A J r r t gen0i No ~ ~gea6al late - w w i I. t ~i e F SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION R I f J ,f M l 1 f.,I + i I i E 4 I~ I r MEMBERS MEMBERS AMER CAN INSTITUTE OR TEAS SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS HANKINS, POWERS, EASTUP, DEATON & TONN ~j 0030 A PrOfSSSIOnt1 COrpontlon gendaNo. 7 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS g8nC21t S 9D2 NORTH LOCUST v P.O. BOX 977 DENTON.TEXAS 78202-0977 qTf -2 917.387-0583 3 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Board of Directors a Greater Denton Arts Council Denton, Texas Our report on our audit of the basic financial statements of the Greater Denton Arts Council for the fisr'' year ended June 30, 1993, appears on page 1. That audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The statement of receipts and disbursements for ~j The Arts Guild is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in P' relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Hankins, Powers, Eastup, Denton & Torn A Professional Corporation Certified Public Accountants J September 6, 1993 I J i 9 P P I is JREATER DENT dH ARTS STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS (CASH BASIS): THE ARTS GUItfi~ y'--~-- FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1993 M Receipts: Membership support - dues Fundraising - auction $ 3,795 Interest 25,070 i„ Contributions 1,664 Other 6,900 Total Receipts ' (37,598 t" Disbursements: Grants - GOAC 29,000 Fundraising - auction -.other 79467 j Membership Professional fees 1,170 504 in Office supplies 204 Miscellaneous Total Disbursements -~4 38.725 Exce:;s of Disbursements over Receipts 1 127 ff t G See Report on Supplementary Information f 10 P,i O yn 1~ n p e: t~ genBaNO ~y' ~gantialte late ~ 7~d 63 NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR 6$0 Aj,0g j PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR f OCTOBER It 1994 THRU SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 j I i j y a., r-- { 1 NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION- LALOR FUN~IIdaNo l~-B PROPOSED BUDGET Agodall r FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1, 1944 THRU SEPTEMBER 300 10811 - Projected Cash, October 1, 1994 L11140 Receipts: Occupancy Tax 64.000 Disbursements: Salaries 36,000 Printing 7,000 Advertising 61000 Travel Postage 2,400 Office Supplies and Expenses 1,500 1,500 Tel eplione 3,500 Office Equipment Maintenance 400 Office Equipment 4,700 Audit O 64.00 Projected Cash after Operating Receipts and Disbursements 29,404 f Improvements to Commeecial Exhibit Buildings (18.000) Projected Cash after Improvements 1-11,404 4 t ~r i'. i daNo NORTH TEXAS TATE FAIR A 0 iATI Ap~9nd3~t 1 SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED BUDGET I 1994 THRU SEPTEMBER 30, 19a~ FOR THE FISCAL YEA". OCTOBER 1, AL R 65% ofd assistant budget on time spent promotixecutngive Director An E Bas NT N p Fairground facilities. tems are distributedeino Texas, t Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico. D Road signs, newspapers, radio, monthly publications, etc. L ~YAttend meetings, shows, seminars and other activities to promote tourism in Denton. S A 9s, posters, brochures, etc. as well as correspondence to Mailing catalogs, follow up inquiries received at meetings, by phone and through the mail. 0_FMCE SUPP_ L1E5 General supplies to maintain an efficient office. E N Necessary to maintain communication. ncctrF Fns IPMENT IiAINT NANS~ machine and adding The office equipment includes a computer, typewriter, copy machines that must be maintained in good condition for efficient use. OFFIC___ _ EOUIPMM Purchase copier and fax machine N make M Up~uthe sersCoandrtoamakehltiattactive fordother usesmore desirable for current r NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR A15QCIATION - LALOR FUND9ttRWO a u © , ACTUAL AND PROJECTED RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Ag6ntlait W463FOR THE FISCAL YEl1R OCTOBER 1, 1993 THRU SEPTEMBER 30, 19NO I Actual Projected Total For Budget 6-30-94 T Year nd Year 93-94 Receipts: Occupancy Tax S 48,844.42 S 15.200.00 S 64.044.42 S 60.000.00 Disbursements: Salaries 32,536.43 3,248.16 35,784.59 36,000.00 Printing 333.55 6,100.00 6,433.55 7,000.00 Advertising 3,110.00 3,000.00 6,110.00 7,100.00 Travel 11800.00 600.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 Postage 508.00 850.00 1,358.00 11400.00 Office Supplies and Expenses 19191.74 200.00 11391.74 900.00 Telephone 2,450.40 600.00 3,050.40 1,500.00 Os ice Equipe.-!nt Haintenance 205.00 100.00 305.00 200.00 Office Equipment 5.783.89 5.783.89 3.500.QO Total 47.919.01 14.698.16 62.617.17 60.000.00 Excess (Deficit) Receipts Over Disbursements 925.41 501,84 1,427.25 S 0 Cash, October 1, 1993 29,619.80 29,619.80 f Transfer (1.643.00) (1,643.00) Cash, June 30, 1994 S 28,902.21 28,902.21 Projected Cash, September 30, 1994 S 29.404.05 S 29.404.05 i `a i ct, s R H TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION - LALOR FUNDSnsndaMa t~ STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS 4endalt FOR THE QUARTER ENDING JUNE 30, 1994 Date Ist 2nd 3rd Year To Quarter Quarter Quarter Date Cash - Beginning S 29,619.80 528 6, 85.49 S 35,493.66 S 29.619.80 Receipts: Occupancy Tax 18,525.6 5 15,062.60 15,25;,.11 _ 48,844.42 Disbursements: Salaries 12,706.79 6,581.49 13,248.15 32,536.43 Printing 30.10 303.45 333.55 Advertising 2,600.00 510.00 3,110.00 Travel 600.00 600.00 600.00 1,800.00 Postage 166.00 226.00 116.00 508.00 Office Supplies and Expenses 459.64 22.45 709.65 11191.74 Telephone 11284.53 589.39 576.48 2,450.40 Office Equipment Maintenance 205.00 205.00 Office Equipment 5,783.89 5,783.69 Transfer (1) 1,64,00 1.643.00 Total Disbursements 19,459.96 8,254.43 21,847.6 49,562,01 Excess (Deficit) Receipts over Disbursements - (934.31) 6.808.17 (6.591.45) _ (717.591 f Cash - Ending L2185.4 493.66 ?8,902t2 8 2. 1 f (1) August 1993 deposit in this account that should have been deposited in the Associations Regular Account. ; i i i r i a, r I ' . E pgeadalte ~ Date 66 11.1„•!1 wolf, TIm slays fill 13,06 ftl fi,uci,l toport 111) by Jul lelloci 4107X1 tlo,ti, Its lob lit lit tl,f Jo, Jel Aug Sep Oct NOT too fill heatless tr,co,et 10 Pill $o t4 ?sit J99t 1106 tp J0 10 11 1100 so 130,000 flit 119t to to 10 to 10 $0 to to $1 to to to t0 110,it le, labor loll to !P $14S 11,710 11,:94 11,179 lI,SIS 11{r,9ot 11,091 11,111 $p li,o to sloe to 10 11 1141 110 11 !10 1p 1160 $1,016 10 10 10 $0 131 !111,312 te,t,Ir 1113 lilt 11,164 13,160 11,1110 10 0 !I SSS 10 10 10 it to 1200 tc,rin 10 $11,13! 9l, 120 9 , to it to tS0 I1, 192 2 211 ISfi 1l,C91 17,t4P !2,313 • 10 9a n{,'111 j $fo la Ilt,Its to !11,111 911,ISo 111,1 r,co,e $!!t 1016111) I1j113 13,310 s3,)ft 16 101 92,!41 16::911 , 111 l,1Sr 11100161 t10,IS1 12 tlrpeolet I ' Otr !1{,101 !701,13: typo Colter Ott 1311,411 +e Qtr 131,316 11e01tirr Director $s, t° so $1 10 ?err 1992 177 to $3,333 to 10 01,331 13,!!! to °0 to to 10 to 13 IO sp slop 9):1)! sp 61 ,la 131 to $1 If 1,094 t0 1$90 so tp 10 .0 to to 111,161 [uuua 14 sp so 10 9!,101 $11,012 111,106 $1,110 11 tl! I° 1140 lei,►e,us, 1361 s0 to to to 10 I1,111 Ill? $111,13! le,bolriip 11x1 gips !1,170 10:21 11,911 su, 11, 93,112 110121 14,111 11 lire to to to 10 so N96 11,1}3 II 11 to 16 to le sp $1 to l6p,lip lotillsterut tip I1 Ito sp to $tp 10 114 9106 !0 to sp 10 to $Is 1121 $Joe lip $1,112 1+l1 1131 !11! 10 It10 $1,112 Orp,it,t[olr ailt t0 (110 1311 $11; $11111 till fill Jill io,rlt, $is $0 t0 to t0 flat (0 fil II2l l till Ir,ll7 lwiue,t is Office 9200 1),1)2 1201 :3017! 13,137 1911 $2,101 1100 1 11 'o9) $1,017 !1,017 110011 $11013 :1,017 11op $1'677 stop $),$J! IJ,S77 $3,937 oirlp,ut 10 11 10 $1,013 11,013 11,013 ~J 111,113 Otllltler 110119 II 172 10 to 14 1100, 11,013 tI,C13 !1,161 11) 10 to (2,211 .2,021 $1,140 1311 110670 11,651 .1,101 12s 477 10 Total11pe,te 111,014 111233 $s,rtt $1,tl3 11,661 $10 lit 111,1131111,I11 (11,611 $11,112 $11,191 11,111 $21.712 Ott 111,106 Ott 111,062 Ott 1111,111 Ott 140,05t 1lll,if0 lit I,cou 1911,1131 160111 It2,11)) (13,903) 11:,191l IIS 3i 3 (111,4Ii) 011,026 (111,t13}fJ11,1011 $14,001 .:r 110,141} I$Ij11s; Ott ($1,372) Qtr $6,111 Ott (111010) Qtr 1111180}10I: •2.161 i 1 f l I s' • agerlQat s--- 6 3 63. mf stn felt :y ml lilt Fall ! ; . . r Ilnr 1111 fist ,a 111•!51 •4d ml 1111 hlr t 1e , 111 lhl hie r 1; ritual- t_l 1 1eei rlwold ktt+ud t r l,t1y 111k "ruutlelrtaawt muclilItAlu+t liturltlltatiaert 1114 1111 Ill! 1s! 1111 rn)e+t Isleuo Stnu fit laeilt Igeae laetn tot beat tpnlt Iiettt let ferote____ I:penr heat wit fieou t:Nnt Gene l Iu (ll,t11 !1,611 IIIl,flll 111 to 111,6111 11,151 41 III,OS11 f11,{n 11 (111,11!1 111,{15 1113 HI 01 ,t 1 krutSnnt 11, IIteattaantt 1 I,fi6 01,}i/ 1 I,U4 16,111 II 111,111 (!1,111 11 16,111 (1,111 H II,4f1, i! $SI;f1T-11r,T21 `(11[,irif-- fft,lir i16,tt1 ~ij1,16 His leetti'-- !1,111 T,l{I - 1117,1111 -'21,11( r,11f- (7!1,1151 I I oil 111,111 (1!4,1111 !salt (wilt) 2111 1 (11,111) Ills 1 (11,1111 11;113 It Ito (n,tlfl Ulilt MM 11'1011 11111 lt,no 111114 6 111 coal-511 414 101 3116 III 1,161 Ill! IS,011 11a---n~3St-1r,101`-111 Us- - --11,14[-71,117'--"121117 --lr,ur -IS,luiic~llr,tnf '-1 iff-Tr l (tisTtlC tow}--Ir,l[I' I[ lss- ZTu~ 11171 1 Canted 1 11,11$ (21,111 1 11,101 114,101 11 111,111 111,18 II !1[,211 111,111 11 1111111 131,40 11141 1,111 11,111 1,601 I,fJ1 Mill 11,1!1 11,1!1 0111 N,1S4 71,1!1 (f,73i 11,111 IS,11! ill ICatalog a 1111""' 7111--"-----1r-nlr' !11 -reml-CA"Ir M- ISf- ---Ill 111 -ns -owls lu~-Nlr- 1111 111 11 Con ltlllits 1,111 11,371 111,81 6,111 11,161 111,147 41,111 110,111 111,011 Kill ti t, 451 111,111 11,117 "111,111 614,61 0 2 11 P410 Art C"^tsst 1 I if 1 1 11 _ 11 till lies Ill In1 till 61 to -ITGFir~Tun1--` [O,ltf-T74f-llff,tl5f 11,117-TIOf-lift/17[- It[T4['[Ir,l/f--"111,1411- ;171`1 Itfl''llf,l"----II~1; 10 11 lair lilt 1 1 to 1 t It 61 $1 11 11 10 (1!,!011 It,ltt 61 (1t,l II Mile Goad 1,114 1,101 11141 t,lls I'm 111111 n,sll to (11,1101 6!,111 ; Is fi;r U i-,._. Ill _ 11 (11141 211 - it 111141 - 1111 151 JIM (111'- 101- - (11021- 16 11 1 11 fits It,lli 11,101 111,111 11,511 11,161 110,151 15.111 1111.0 111,111 14,111 116,121 611,911 pl,l" 1711111 !19,61 11 Ct raters ills 1 _ •1155 1,111 1 111,1711 16 11 09 11 _ -Illy flaT - _ -:1 1` "lilt)" 19--_1 . 111111 11111 -~flf'-IF- - 117111- fir--- it -1R II ( (1 (l if 11 let Cnu OW-411 I 1 (1 1 1 11 to If 10 $1 II 11 It 16 1 to tauowa 1 1 I 1 1 1 11 11 II 11 111Tiid-cif - 1[,111-1,711 11[,5111 11,111 1,111' `1!!;117) 11,711'V1111 "111,1571 111.111"11,01! 111.6711 111,131 11,661 511,31 121 11 Illllltq 19'1!1 11 {11 11111 1im it (11(,1' 116!11 11'141 1 filloill 11,11: 6 16if1111j 111,111 15lederel1) 11 ljly~ fill If If __-I -if Irmt to--- 1_- F -Ir---- r--T---: Ir-----tr ---Ir - 11 elf 11 lies 65 11 11191 It (loll 11161; Of 111I3t 111031 It$ of (ill) If to 1 311 151 111111 1,110 ' 111451 . 111411 ,161 Will n Ill! (1{111 1,111 1 e 4 0111111 111151 11,27` 117111 1111!1 11,111 (Jill) 111H1 II,SII (tit If leetn1'.1t i 11 office f 11Offio{dt 1,111 t9 3111111 1,111 1 1!1,1111 1!,601 11 lil,itil II,NI IS 111,1151 111111 11 IS1,19 / II leftist Ill sit _1$2111 lit Us III 6661 11_11 ISO 1111 IS:! Iit _ IS95 list lilt 11 Wirt 1 brit 3 I'M i Iliiii11 !,Ill 1 111`5111 fill- t 11 ttl(1211 111101 _ 11 11111065 II,ISI -11 (f-[ Ili 1til 11 tit slow 11 11 •I5 100 11 -11 Ill 115 Jill 111 161 !IJ 1St tilt OS - J 1 $1,111 fill (111141 - $111 - till Iii o (it: 13 11keti fasten 6( Ill tin 041 sit 'lilt 11101 0111 lit; 00 A1l__ l6 tole {a lilt 1 111 37 4F 5!1![11' II iN 16 tote bill eu 1,621 1 Ill ,fill 1~1 f 1_--111;1111` It,lq 11 01,1111 1111 11 faun! 8 I n J tl (17,11 . -"---""---1,161' `1-----lit,1t11 `lrirltr 1 I It 61 If If $1 If 11 1111 11 Ulf t1 $t,1M 31 iW4'4 ;;ter t 1 11 1 1 11 it 11 11 1.,101 11 11!,1111 11 111,1t $S! 1161 _ fl 11 1 - -ifTTiITItI't--'--- 61- Ill_._ ii111-- 111 - -Ili Of it - Ill!} lilt 41ItillUll 1,111 1 11!,111; I,III 1 111,1111 11,111 it 1111411 11,416 I1 115,1111 17,111 11 111,11 Pita full I 1 1 1 1 I !t !1 10 It II 11 If 11 1 - i1l~I 11 "flit $full 1;111" 1--(II,D2f-'--T,lif'~r --111;lllf 111117-11 11J11S1( __iITti`-ri--- I11Z1[T-- ...it MIMI1111,111 111,111 116511111111.111 411,111 11111111 11111111 (11,111 1111,111111i,ill $iS,lll 1111,1511114,30 (4111: 10 i...:•e ..se 11,:1 e::ue: e B,SIt 191 101 i 1.11.111 191 t 11.14% al lota 11. 191 a 19 !1S 1Ir71tTlTt n t t t e n 1111(1a p1 eh na RoT•<ti eu iiT ee9eiS rieeieli mint. l { igeodaNo QQ L 44enda►I........ bale 7_ jet 4" 6 3 63. Irif,S!!1 hit 11 4 le . Iris tlfl hSr 1 ~'y l1 no till Fit , i. iriF 1!!!11!1 5`c m I 1 h yi w;SLyr, t ~ -1 ' fAuclrl Itrtealil llrul[l1 IGteii•!• Firualrl IGtnalt f ; t'~{ •y q ~ 1• . IErutld lGSeuit ILitetal ltdunt I!!1 till lilt 1!! IrKru hear Jot he 151! irrJ.et 71Kw [legee lot 1eow ~tlprn [legal Fit Srceu IL►nu Inert - Fit Some _--h" ut Irnu l,t '"m l - llieer8ualt ~14,1O 11,48 101,1111 11,119 11 111,14)) (1,151 11 111,0511 111,115 11 tsll,t!S} 111,11! (115 11111!1 l lbace tills I $,iit 11,111 t 1,631 11,111 11 111,311 115,!!5 it 8,i11 11,101 8 13,1!1 63,H it 14 too " IS11 Milt 53!,15! it6,tll 1(15,11 `1IebTliii6"- 3!113! -T,111- _11H4111 36;11[" T,BF" _ 1111,1111-_ - (21,111 (11,111 (sit; Sill jil.111 1!111&1 (flee) lilt I 511,!81 till 1 111,1111 14113 is {11,163} till 11 IIII!! il,t{s 11 111,Li I iw C401-off _ 414 101 1121 1S! 1,18 _ 1621 11,111 13,111 Il,ti! 111111 11,115 (4161 (11631 MISS 111 -F'IK-~7u 13;!51 11, 11-Id,li: It,Fi1 -11,8! 1111-'21,!11 111,115 M~111,i111 '--if,1{SS-17117 -CsceS ill ll -101!5! 111,114 Zic2TTRn i Cuelal ! 14.151 1,141 1,111 !4151 MCI 4,115 Will 11,11! ,iSi 6311 11,101 11,111 1!,711 11,111 fl,ftl I{I I dGbl -"TT1213-C-Tt[r - !!2 _ III -151 ' -llf -{IS-- --ltl{ - {SFr___ 1211- ISIS -11i-1631` - 7131'-- - lMnl lllRr CBS 511211 110.511 !1111 11,141 13,111 16,141 (!1,163 !11,111 11,111 !11,12! 3N,111 iS,itl'12t,1to 511,!3 111 !SOS 113 ISIS ills It 11 ! PAN It p4la Art Cmtest 1 1 f0 1 1 11 _ _ 11 ISIS -71TrTirGiu„r---11,73~'T711-"}115;1'0! "--frl91-T,8' -`Sllflil~ 11 Ill;ql--Ip,l'll- -ItTIIriIrFifl- 11{;5'51-Ril'1IIC,SIi-°" I3>l 11 fill 611 1 _ 14 SWIM Gila! 11144 :1101 loll) 1.105 I'm 11011 11,151 61 Ill,uol! 11,101 to (11,1111 1411! !1 !11,61 till - 151 11 If I If rd 1 13,11U11- 64 6 11,111 ({1'1111 11,521 11,111 160.4411 45,111 111,111 1!213)! 11,fill is 111 1!5,111 1115211 11,84 111,117 161,45 It 11163 It G lee[lrr ISIS 1 1IS! 1,111 1 111,1!21 11 11 19 II 11 IS 11 tl I _11 Ty 8or - t1 - -i 11111 121' 1_- - 11111111 !11 _ {3111 `111 It- - II - - lit - 11 " - $0 11 it $1 11 ice Crru Crrrl•/lf I 1 t1 1 1 IS 10 II !I 11 11 It II 11 (1 t It illltalge l II L[r6l"oe7 12,111 ' f,if! " (12,1!11 111,70 ' l,ll{ {ll;fli} 63,}!I- (1,131 " 'ill,i5}S 111,141 '11142 _ 111,5!!! 11!1151 I1,SS! I , ll11111t 10,141 1 1111,1411 11,411 1 1111,41!1 111,11! 11 I111,12tI 11,4{1 11 SII,SiII lli,t}1 If Illl,ll 131ulrrrl5/ it I (fill 11 1 11111 _-Ill 11F It (fill ill 111 (fill it so 7rlLltre li--li` qij - 61 hlPl luil) ---11 10 14ii`tS,ii $is -'1-._..._ lilil It If 11111 --11 1 S 61ea11!{e 311 !SI 131131 l,lll 11155 {19451 12,111 ll,tOt INTO 21,1!3 {Iltl 122231 11,41 11,111 1111 If alflit t!! illl 116111 1,011 1 111,6111 till it Will Jill it 11!!11 (sit If lilt tl Cffieleli 1,10 It 111,1211 1,161 1 111,1111 51,10! 11 (I1,4f1) !1,141 10 111,1411 12,111 11 112,14 J 8161ealt 141 01 112111 541 W Ill till 1711 ISO 1411 lilt Ili !Sit WI_ Olt J 31 eh-_ Sit- 1451 311 1 - l!! 1111 2,500 I i111S1q 11sf01. fill 5111110 1!`ift-.. 11 !!111011 ` 11451 - to {!till ill 11 }112!5! 21111 I6 Sit flee It 51 11 100 I! I! {0 Il11 ISI IS} Fl! M !HI IS fit- 11111 1101 sill ill 131 111701 11,1!1 1211 111,1151 14.01 fill te( 10 If 1411 knalatigr - till 111 Oil At l . •5211 100 114 lilt Ill (11 11,111 1! wKoala a-2 Peal 11,611 ,111 - -'IS 111,0111 i,lif-- V -11fl- - 11,12f to 111,811 11,ifI "--it - {Ii,2SiFi-- Kill[ -1t 15!65 -'31 lerver 1 1 Is !1 11 11 11 it 11 IIII 11 t 1 11 swat 11 swim >»w 11 1 11 1 1 31 11 11 11 12,101 _ 11 11!,1111 11,111 11 111.1c -51 iilTnt; 11- Ilr 11 - 121- Ill.. - -ur Ill It {fill 1142 1St filil 11 II I 11lt11t2111 I'm 1 11!14311 1,111 1 (111031 i4631 11 (17,1111 15,111 11 11111111 11,111 11 (it'll 41 Rise Wet 1 ! ! ir--1--- (11;1171--. 111111!--11 lil,Iiq nr-tl - 11Riif - itil{ -if - TIM -41T an 7TijC--- 1;111- '--1 01,1141-1--n. • 1 _ ' Oi1,111 lll 1111313.,1181 !!1,463 125163,,111 52! (ll! ISI 111.111 1011011 l1i1,31} 161.81 IIIt,101 1S4,141 101 119::::! 16. 1111,!51 11111113 tOl i 118.1 110[ i • !OS : 11.433 11,111 101 a 31.451 IOS ~ . _ '111 TII u e r r r er l1gj M q egu Sa2ecri n1 ROE &jgit rReleli ternler, _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - wCITY.~ ~COUNCI o' as o e r0M t{ ~ Y } J. r a Pn.c...rc. My ;s i y Clry OI04WON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 `t f 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 30, 1994 3 TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager rr FROM: Kathy DuBose, Acting Executive Director of Finance 61 3 SUBJECT: DCAD PROPOSED BUDGET Attached Is the Proposed 1995 budget for the Denton Central Appraisal District. Mr. Joe Forsythe from the Appraisal District will present the budget and answer any questions that the Council might have. I'leasa advise if you have any questions concerning this matter. AltschRNM A"0"9 e r« F iT h +rw n 1 v > ' r^ i i11 A' w 4 8171566.8200 D/fw METRO 434-2529 i I v , yt }j t I `~yrw 1 I F ,Y ii h . 9 I O, Oata 20~ ~ { 19j j iJ94 s ilv_ x s F Denton Central Appraisal District Proposed 1995 Budget i t c -4 1 < C PAGE 2 40floaN4 DENTON CENTRAL APPRASAL DISTRICT -W4aot 199S BUDGET fair TABLE OF CONTENTS -?J I 30~2~ PAGE 2: TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3: BUDGET LETTER PACE 1: GRAPH-COMPARISON OF BUDGET WITH INFLATION AND GROWTH PAGE S: SUMMARY OF 1995 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND COMPARISON TO THE 1991 BUDGET PAGE 8: 1995 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE 1991 EXPENDITURES BUDGET PAGE 7. EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES 6 DECREASES PAGE 14: 1995 ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET PAGE 16: CAPITAL EXPENDITURES PAGE 1S: 1995 SALARY SCHEDULE PAGE 20: SALARY SURVEY i i w: 9 PAGE 3 10"CaNo S DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICTWrdaIt 3911 :NORSE STREET / P.O. BOX 2816 Date--- DENTON, TEXAS 76202.2816 817-566-0904 June 14,1994 To The Denton CAD Beard of Directors And All Taxing Jurisdictions Served By Denton CAD: The Proposed DCAD 1995 Budget is hereby submitted to the Board of Directors and the taxing jurisdictions served by DCAD. In accordance with Tax Code Sec. 6.06, the Proposed Budget is being delivered to all necessary parties by June 15th. There will be a public hearing on the Proposed budget at the July 28th Board Meeting. The original 1995 departmental budget requests were for $3,077,911. There were several hems removed from the original budget requests. The Board opted to fund the most important items from available funds. The Items to be purchased from available funds are: a replacement roof at $100,000, anew telephone system at $35,000 and an Image processing system at $155,000. These items, which total $290,000. will be paid for from a capital asset reserve that has boen built over the years. These purchases wil! deplete the reserve. Both decreases and Increases caused notable changes In the Proposed 1995 BuJget, as compared to the 1994 Budget. Major decreases were accomplished by dosing the southern regional office, eliminating two fulldime positions, and eliminating the contracted building and grounds maintenance services for the Denton office. Increases resulted from the addition of a maintenance employee, adding several part-time employees, and providing for a 2.5% merit salary increase. The net effect of the changes Is an Increase from the 1994 Budget of $41,122 or 1.7%. The very modest Increase should be well received when viewed In the short tern. However, recent budgetary activity does not bode well for the taxing jurisdictions over the WV run. DCAD is simply not receiving the annual funding required to operate the district. An organization can not continue as an effective ongoing enterprise if the organization spends more funds each year than lt receives. } During 1993 the district spent $263,000 on necessary automation which benefits the jurisdictions we serve. Most of these funds came from the sell of tapes, copies, etc. We are now planning to spend $290,000 for items that are necessary. These hems too will be funded primarily from sell of tapes, copies, etc. If we assume a 3% inflation rate, and the district desired to accommodate the higher cost of doing business, the 1994 Budget would have increased by $71,344. If we continue this logic for 1995, the Proposed 1995 Budget would Increase by $73,484. If we then factor in 1% for growth each year, the two budgets would have increased another $48,275. Thus, if the 1994 and 1995 Budgets had kept pace with a 3% inflation rate and I% annual growth, the Increase would have been $193,103. Our increase for these two years totals $41,122. To further emphasize the point about allowance for growth, we need to visit the effective tax rate calculations. The effective tax rate worksheet removes new growth from the calculations. This is done so thal when s taxing jurisdiction sets It's tax rate, the tax rate will generate "new" tax revenues from new Improvements that will be available to fund services caused by the new growth. Just as cities have to provide additional fire, police and other services to new growth areas, school districts have to provide new school buildings and additional teachers for new residential growth. The same logic Is true for appraisal districts. New growth dictates sWitionat revenue, which Is in the hands of the taxing jurisdictions The problem is that wa are not receiving the necessary share of these new axes to fund our requh ui services due to the new growth. The next page of the Proposed Budget Is a graph that reflects how the appraisal district's budgets are rot tracking 1 aftrnd R J, F r Y. 3 t DCAD BUDGET WITH INFLATION AND GROWTH 2,590,000 2,572,180 (A) r 2,530,000 ACTUAL Z INFLATION 2,470,000 2,473,250 I 2,41 D,D00 • / • 2,419,247 (B) 2,378,125 / / i ■ ■ / / i I ,378,125 2,350,000 1993 1994 1995 g ro _ (A) The $2,572,180 represents an assumed 3% inflation 6 1% annual growth. (B) The $2,419,247 represents the Proposed 1995 Budget. 1' ~ W i P ,r -O 2!j w ,go pwaa No Ardal Data 6&6 2! DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 5 1995 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES BUDGET AND COMPARISON TO THE 1994 EXPENDITURES BUDGET ACCT ACCOUNT TITLE 1994 BUDGET 1995 BUDGET 5117 SALARIES $1,261,432 $1,294,007 5119 SOCIAL SECURITY (FICA) $87,346 $89,670 5120 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE $135,248 $128,075 5121 RETIREMENT (TCDRS) $51,488 $55,994 5123 LONGEVITY PAY $13,380 $13,380 5124 AUTO EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT $118,188 $118,188 5125 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE $21,507 $22,053 5126 GENERAL INSURANCE $15,913 $15,913 5127 AUDIT $4,500 $4,750 5128 LEGAL SERVICES $70,000 $70,000 5129 OIL, GAS, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, AND UTILITY VALUATION $21,750 $21,750 5130 DEEDS, SALES, AND VALUE INFORMATION $31,106 $32,119 5132 PRINTING SERVICE $43,7^7 $43,207 5133 OFFICE SUPPLIES $42,138 $43,406 5134 FURNITURE 8 EQUIPMENT $25,209 $43,317 5135 OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $9,200 $12,074 5136 DATA PROCESSING MAINTENANCE $85,994 $65,994 5137 MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES $8,196 $7,713 5138 TRAINING • SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES, AND TRAVEL $23,689 $31,085 5139 POSTAGE Z FREIGHT $67,088 $87,088 5141 LEGAL NOTICES d ADVERTISING $4,000 $4,000 5143 ELECTRICITY, WATER & SEWER $31,920 531,920 5145 TELEPHONE $31,035 $20,340 f 5146 BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINTENANCE $35,140 $15,811 5148 APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD $22,680 S22,6a) 5152 CONTINGENCY $30,000 $35,000 1 5153 BUILDING & LAND PAYMENT $59,088 $59,088 5154 BUILDING & LAND IMPROVEMENTS $19,680 $21,000 5155 MISCELLANEOUS $8,605 $6,805 5158 OTHER ASSETS $700 $2,600 TOTAL $2,3378125 $2,419_247 p d pAGE B 9404 NO AQb*lt -9 DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 1995 BUDGET SUMMARY OF 1895 ESTIMATED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ' AND COMPARISON TO THE 1994 BUDGET 1994 f995 CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET REVENUES: FUNDING FROM JURISDICTIONS $2,358,125 $2,411,747 : INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS $20.000 57,500 4119,247 TOTAL REVENUES ~ .378,125 52 EXPENDITURES: TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES $2,378,125 $2 t Yrl. f I 111 Nfy f ' R 1995 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, PAGE 7 INCREASES AND DECREASES CLASSIFICATION 1995 1991 INCREASE OR BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE rACCT i 6f 1 i - 3ALARjEg v~ 61,294,007.22 $1,261,431,73 632,575.49 THERE ARE 47 FIAL.nME P051704 N TIE 1905 BUDGET, W19C4 REPRE5ENT3 A DIECREASE OF I FLU-TIME POSITION PRIMPRY ELEMENT) OF T, g 1985 S ARIE'S BUOGE T ARE AS FOLLOWS (1) AN 'DENOTES A NEW ITEM 0ONE FULL-TIME MANTEI~E POSITIDN WA3 ADOED Pi TWO APPP'4 SAL SUPPORT P06RgNS WERE ELIMINATED (4) SEVERAL PART-TIME P06MIZI 1S WERE ADDED (S) THERE IS A 2 S% MERIT INCREASE FOR E.XISTNO PE RSOWL i (6) THREE APPRAISAL SUPPORT EMPLOYEES RECEIVED A SALARY i ADAATMENT TO $17,601 CURRENT EMPLOYEES' SALARIES 'FULL-TIME BUILDING MAIMTENANCE EMPLOYEE $1,219,027.02 PART-TIME APPRAISER FOR COL-WERCUIL PROPERTY $1016,000.00 PART-TIME CLERICAL FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY 1,000,00 PART-TIME FILE CLERKS, 2 EA-RESIDENTIAL $3,000,00 PART-TIME CLERICAL, 2 EA-RESIDENTIAL $1,800.00 I 'PART-TIME NOWE'SCALERS', 2 EA-REVDENTIA 61,920.00 'PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR OD 'PART-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT ;1,62000 j LAND DEPT. $2,000.00 r TOTAL /ALARIE/ • ACCT i Sill ( $1,294W7,22 E ACCT/b1f0.8pCU1LSECURITY(FICA) {89,869.73 $87,346.40 12,623.33 TE FICA BIADET REM IS 7.65%OF TFE EMPLOYEES COMPENSATICN. TOTAL FICA • ACCT IS 6111 568,889.73 05120 -GROUP HEALTHINSURANCE~ 1126,075.00 $135,217.66 (61,172,68) THE oa0(AP HEALTH "9L*W CE BUDGET IS FOR EMPLOYEES MY. THE APPRAISAL DESTRUCT DOES NOT PAY FOR DEPLT N7S L"LAIR G6 TE ANNUAL BILLNO FOR 47 EMPLOYEES FOR 1095 IS E9nMATED TO BE 12,725 00 PER EMPLOYEE THE ABOVE AMOUNT REPRESENTSA DECREASE PER EMPLOYEE FOR HEALTH i TOTAL HEALTH INSURANCE -ACCT / 5120 $120,075,00 - C - ACCTibf21-RETIREMENT(TCDR" 655,994.24 $S1,488.28 54,505,00 . TE RETIREMENT EXPENSE 13 A 3A% Cy GROSS PAY FDR ALL I%U-T; E PERSOWL TOTAL RETIREMENT • ACCT / 1121 $56,99424 I OwiO+ENo i i late .,y I 5 9 t f t 1995 APPRAISAL. OPERATIONS BUDGET PAGE 8 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES 1995 1994 INCREASE OR CLAS31FICAIION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT 0 b123 -LONGEVITY PAY $13,390.00 513,380.00 $0.00 EACH EMPLOYEE'$ LONGEVITY PAY 19 64 PER MONTH FOR ♦ EACH YEAR OF SEAVMM i TOTAL LONGEVITY PAY - ACCT / 6123 $13,38000 i } ACCT 0 6124 -AUTO laPENSE REIMBURSEMENT-] $118,188.00 $118,188.00 60.00 t I THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR THE i USE OF TFEYL PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES USED "IND ! THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR RESACN^S61LITIES. 1 7 TOTAL AUTO RIEWSuA6EMENT•ACCTlN24 5118,16800 3 ACCT 0 6125 • WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE $22,053.35 $21,607.30 3548.05 THIS ACCOUNT PRONCES MM(ER9' OCMP INSURANCE' I COVERAOE TO THE EMPLOYEES 1 ( TOTAL WORKER$'COMP-ACCT 06126 322,053,35 I f ACCT / 6128 - GENERAL iNSURANCE $15,913.00 $15,913.00 $0,00 THE OENERJLL NSILRANCE BUDIOET ITEM IS liI OOMPRISEO OF THE FOLLOWING { 1 (1) BUILDING, CONTENTS, ETC. 34,641 C'1 (2) BOND INSURANCE 61 W2 00 (3) COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 32,802 00 (4) PUBLIC OFFICIAL LIABILITY S4,900,00 (5) VALUABLE PAPERS $1,300.00 (8) EMPLOYEES DISHONESTY BONDS $850,00 (7) NOTARY REGISTRATION $251.00 TOTAL GENERALINSURANCE -ACCT 06124 $15913.00 ACCT 0 6121 • AUDIT $4,750.00 $4,600.00 $250.00 T049 BUDGET ITEM IS BEMJO NCKASED A MINOR AMOUNT WmIICH REFLECTS A REASONABLE INCREASE TOTAL AUdT • ACCT 9 14 27 $4,75000 ! - - rACCT 0 6128 -LEGAL 8ERVICEB , 370,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM 1900AOED FOR ALL LEGAL EXPEP4ES ASSOC+ATEO riRH OEFE101NO VALUES TOTAL LEGAL $EAMES • ACCT IT 3126 f 70 000 00 '(Qooapp, I ``77 'CJ 41p1~1 s:l s i a PAGES z 1995 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET EXPLANATION Of EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES 1995 1994 INCREASE OR BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE CLASSIFICATION _ _ f21,750,~ (0'00 _ _ _ f21,T50.0it ACCT / 5129.OIL, OAS, AND UTILITY VALUATIO!~ THE BUDGET AMOUNT FOR THOS LM flEM IS BEoaG "CETED TdE SAME AS 1994 TF9S "MIS CONTRACTED FOR A'VYC YEARPERIDO MD WILLBE REBID FOR 1996 AND 1991 THE 1995 OCrNTR v is FORT $21.750. gy1,750.00 TOTAL VALUATION SERVICES • ACCT / 6129 $32,116.79 131,106.46 (1,012.3] ACCT / b130 -DEED, SALES, AND INFO TMy q T ITEM 1SCOMM SEDOF TTE PRIMARY SOURCES OF VALUE T*CRMAT t $32,11879 TOTAL VALUATION SERVICES • ACCT / 6130 °I 206.63 $43,706.69 ($500.17) ti ! ACCT / 61326132 RIP.'"-NTINO SERVICE h TILS ACOCAINT IS CFi aow FOR ALL TtEM9 TUT ARE PRINTED $43,206.53 TOTAL PPJNTL40 • ACCT / 6132 405.87 $12,135.76 $1,270.05 ACCT / 6133 - OFFICE SUPPUES fEOFFICE BUF4lY BUDGET IS COMPRISED OF E)PENSES i, r OFFICE SUPPLY CMS yoX*ED FOR TRADMCNAL (43,105.83 TOTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES • ACCT / 6133 _ _ _ $43,317.00 $25,206.60 $16,106.20 ACCT / 5134 • FURNITURE 6 EQUIPMENT 4S BUDOET SECTION 19 oIVIDED BY DEPARTMENT AN ASt T S04EDJLE APPEARS AT TE ETD CF THE WDI3ET (4.9,347.00 TOTAL FURNITUNg A EQUIPMENT • ACCT 6134 $2,ST4.00 $12A74.00 $9P20'00 ACCT / 5135.OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCC MAINTENANCE OF ALL OFFICE EOU4PMENt EXC£RT FOR THE PERSONAL COMPUTERS' THE PRIMARY COMPUTER AND COMPUTEfl pER4P4ERAI DEVICES l9 0+1AROED TO MIS ACCOUNT 512.074.00 TOTAL OFFICE EQUIP MAINT • ACCT / 6136 ogle i e ` n 199S APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET PAGE 10 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES 1993 1994 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET OECREAS': ACCT C 8138 - DATA PROCESSING MPdNTENANCE---- $85,994.20 $851994.20 $0.00 THIS ACCOUNT IS COMPRISED OF BOTH DATA PROCESSING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE BOTH ITEMS ARE CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT 90 THAT THE TOTAL COST OF DATA PROCESS NG WILL BE SHOWN 44 ONE AOCOIMT, W HARDWARE RELATED. 1. (A) MAINFRAME RISC 8000 COMPUTER, WAJNL X t OPERATING SYSTEM, ISM MODEL 590 $13,000,00 (8) UNIX OPERATING SYSTEM $750.00 (C) UNIVERSE PICKNNUX CONVERSION $3,175.20 2. W 1200 LPM SHUTTLE MATRIX PRINTER, e PRINTRONIX MODEL P9012 $2,31200 (8) 1200 LPM SHUTTLE MATRIX PRINTER, PRINTRONIX MODEL P9012 $2.312.00 (C) 600 LPM BAND PRgtTER, PRINTROND(MODEL P800 $2,8920D (D) 300 LPM PRINTRONOX PRINTER "WOO (E) 300 LPM PRINTRONIX PRINTER $900.00 + 3. TERMINALS $1,000.00 4. VARIOUS HARDWARE CONNECTIONS, CABLE AND MOVING EQUIPMENT $1,500.00 5. PC MAINTENANCE $8,000,00 8. UPS EQUIPMENT MAINTENMfCE (EPE) $6.126.00 (B) SOFTWARE RELATED: 1. CONTRACT MAINTENANCE (WISOFTWARE GROUP) $28,819.00 2. DESIGNATED PROGRAMMING EXPENSES $8,90000 3. TRAINING ON USE OF SYSTEM $I'm 00 4. MICRO COMPUTER PROGRAMMING $1,500.00 J S. VARIOUS PROGRAMMING CHANGES $1,108.00 TOTAL OP MAINT - ACCT 6 6136 W 99{ 20 ACCT f 8137 - MEMBERSHIPS, SUBSC t DUES $7,713.45 $G,198.45 ($483.00) 7M ACCOUNT IS CHARGED FOR ALL MEMBERSHIPS AND GOES. AND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO EDUCATIONAL MEDIA. THOSE ITEMS NOT APPLICABLE DIRECTLY TO A DEPARTMENT ARE J ARCED TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT FURTHER THOSE ITEMS CHARGED WITHIN A DEPARTMENT THAT ARE NOT CHARGEABLE TO A PARTICLLAR EMPLOYEE ARE CHARGED TO THE DEPA7TMENT HEAD TOTAL MEMBERSH!F8, $U88 8 DUES -ACCT 6137 $7,713.45 ~pen~Na. g)dr*-.?`' { oat,-2-7 milli i ~ i 3 1995 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET PAGE 11 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES 1995 1994 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT / 5435 • TRAINING • SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES 351,085.00 $27,683.31 117,398.99 6 TRAVEL -`---J-'--~ Y THIS AOOOUNT IS OHAROED FOR ALL EDUCATIONAL RELATED TRAWINOANDTRAVEL THE TRIPSTOAUSTW TO PROTEST THE STATE PROPERTY TAX BOARD VALUE FWXW ARE ALSO CHARGED TO THIS ACCOUNT. TOTAL TRAINING -ACCT 111138 $31,085.00 HT / 6139 -POSTAGE d FREIGITT 1187,088.00 1187,038.00 x'00 e I TH Is BLOW ITEM IS COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOW WG. (1) P.EAPPRASSAL NOTICES, WHICH ARE MAILED TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND AGENTS ON MAY 15TH: 185,000 NOTICES 011.25 EA $48,250.00 (2) GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE, WHICH INCLUDES 113 000.00 LETTERS 8 PACKAGES (3) SUPPLEMENTAL VALUE NOTICES, WHICH ARE SENT APPROXIMATELY 9 TIMES 3,913 NOTICES 0 $.25 EA 5978.00 (4) CERTIFIED MAIL FOR ARS ACTIVITY $2.000 00 (S) LETTERS SOLICITING SALES INFORMATION $2.900A0 (8) SENDNO CHECKS TO PAY BILLS (7) POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL (S) PUSTAGE BOX RENTAL (2 EA 0 5340) $680.00 (9) POSTAGE MACHINE MAINTENANCE $480.00 (10) NEWSLETTER $1,440.00 i (I I) OTHER MAILINGS $3172.00 TOTAL POSTAGE & FREIGHT - ACCT 9,131 $87 Ole00 JCT_l / 5141- 1164L NOTICES 6 ADVERT131N0 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 THS AOOOuNT IS CHARGED FOR ADVERTISEMENTS IN NEwsPAPERs CONCERNING EXEMPTION MATTERS SUCH AS HOMESTEADS, OVER 63. CISABLED VETERANS, AND PH:DOIA:'VTTY VALUATION MATS ERS OTHER ADVERTISEMENTS HAVE TO DO WITH APPRAISAL REVIEW I11 NDTICES. MISCELIMEaACLAS5IFlEDADVERTISWO. AND RMTATIONS TO BID. TOTAL LEGAL NOTICES A ADV. - ACCT 011141 $4,000.00 i I ACCT / 6147 • ELECTRICITY, WATER 8 SEWER !}71,920.15 1171,920.15 $0.00 THIS BUDGET ITEM is FOR THE DISTRICTS CfTY PROVIOEO LTTTLRES. THE EUOG'ETED AMOUNT kS REMAI NNO THE SAME TOTAL ELECT, WATER 8 SEWER • ACCT 911143 $31.920.15 Apd I Ontr /-41 O 1 , S r 1995 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET PAGE 12 EXPLANATION Of EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES f 1995 1491 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACC T 16145 - TELEPHONE $20,339.70 $31,035.30 ($10,895.80) THE CLOSMJ OF THE LEWISVILLE OFFICE IS REDUCING TELEPHONE EXPENSE (1) LOCAL LINES - DENTON 05W 9N 51812 OB (2) METRO LINE - DENTON $451.8018 $2,291.40 (3) METRO LINE - DENTON 043+2002 Sg 00 1 LONG DISTANCE CALLS $5,10000 I (5) CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE $2,29892 (8) AT&T LANGUAGE INTERPRETING LINE 5300.00 (7) MISCELLANEOUS TELEPHONE EXPENSE $500,00 (8) LOCAL DIRECTORIES $253.30 TOTAL TELEPHONE -ACCT 0 6143 120,338.70 jACCT 0 5146. BUILDING GGROUNDS MAINTENANCE $13,831.00 $35,140.00 ($19,309.00) l III B-om ITEM cow m 6 ALL BVILDNO AND OROAM MAINTENANCE, AT SOME POIIR N THE t NEAR FUM1E THERE WILL WIVE TO BE BUBSTANTtAL FUNDS SPENT ON WAX WO ALL, OR PART OFD THE AA OCFDITTOHIDA UNITS ' TMS AOOMW IS BEND DECREASED BECAUSE A FULL•TWE MAMMNANCE EMPLOYEE M BEING MCGETED I C (1) BUILDING MAINTENANCE $15,031.00 (2) GROUNDS MAINTEWCE 180000 TOTAL BLDG, A GROUNDS MAINT -ACCTS $144 i1 S 831.00 j~ ACCT 0 $118 - APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD 1 $22,880.00 $22,880.00 $0.00 f THIS WDOET ITE1114 CHARGED FOR PAYMENTS TO 1 ARB MEMBERS FOR WORK DUFIM THE MANDATED VALUE EQUALIZATION PROCESS. I (1) MAY, JUNE AND JULY MEETINGS $18,00000 12) FOUR SUPPLEMENTAL ALL C ,Y MEETINGS $2,88000 (3) FNE SUPPLEMENTAL HALF IJAY MEETINGS $1.8m.00 TOTAL APPRAIM REVIEW BOARD - ACCT 1$11$ 522.880.00 I FCT 0 5152 - CONTINGENCY 1 $33,000.00 $30,000.00 $5,000.00 THIS ACODUNT IS FOR UNAMICIPATEO EXPENSES TOTAL CONMNGENCY - ACCT 0 6112 $35,00000 OatAp1AQ~1 1995 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET PAGE 12 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES 1995 1994 INCREASE OR CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE ACCT A 5145 • THONE- $20,339.70 {31,035.30 - ~ -EL-_EP-_--~ ($70,895.60) TW OLOSING OF THE LFWISVRLE OFFICE IS REMONO TELEPHONE EXPENSE (1) LOCAL LINES • DENTON 05660901 $161206 (2) METRO LINE - DENTON 0134-0016 $2,297,10 (3) METRO LINE • DENTON 0131-2802 $16.56 00 (4) LONG DISTANCE CALLS $5.40000 (5) CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE $2,29692 (6) AT&T LANGUAGE INTERPRETING LINE :x0000 (7) MISCELLANEOUS TELEPHONE EXPENSE f500,00 (8) LOCAL DIRECTORIES $26330 TOTAL TELEPHONE • ACCT 8 $145 320 870 'a f, i ACCT / 5118 - BUILDING d GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 3 $15,831.00 $35,114.00 ($19,309.00) T W BUDGET REM COMPRISES ALL BUILDING AND t OR011ND8 MAINTENANCE. AT SOME POINT IN THE NEAR FV PURF THEM WILL HAVE TO BE SUBSTANTIAL FUNDS SPENT ON REPUACM ALL. OR PART OF, THE AIR CONDITIONING LINKS. hW ACCOUNT IS BEND DECREASED BECAUSE A ( FULL-TIME MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEE IS BE NO BUDGETED ( (7) BUILDING MAINTENANCE $15,931.00 (2) GROUNDS MAINTENANCE $60000 TOTAL BLDG. & GROUNDS MAINT • ACCT 0 $148 $15183100 I ACCT / 5146 • APPRAISAL REVIEW 80ARD $22,680.00 $22,860.00 $0.00 TENS BUDOET REM N CHARGED FOR PAYMENTS TO ARG MEMBERS FOR WORK DAM THE MANDATED VALUE EOUALQAT10N PROCESS. (1) MAY, JUNE AND JURY MEETINGS $18,000,00 (2) FOUR SUPPLEMENTAL ALL D %Y MEETINGS $2,880,00 (3) FIVE SUPPLEMENTAL HALF bAY MEETINGS $1,800.00 TOTAL APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD -ACCT 0 8148 $22 1400 s FCCT 0 5152 • CONTINGENCY $35,000.00 $30,000.00 $51000.00 THIS AOODUNT IS FOR U NANTDIPATE D EXPENSES TOTAL CONTINGENCY -ACC' 0 5182 $35,000 00 ! -Q 23 7-9- 9-el Y V'„ J py r - y,-i r v ,..1,e f+ a 1D95 APPRAISAL OPERATIONS BUDGET PAGE 13 EXPLANATION OF EXPENDITURES, INCREASES AND DECREASES 199S 1991 INCREASE OF CLASSIFICATION BUDGET BUDGET DECREASE - ACCT O 51S3 - BUILOINO -3 LAN- D PAYMENT $59,068.00 $59,068.00 $0.00 UUS ADCOUNT IS CHARGEO FOR TIE Pl YMENTS ON THE APPRAISAL CISTRICTS EUILS%NG ANC LAND NOTE FOR } THE DENTON OFFICE. TOTAL SUWNG A LAND PAYMENT - ACCT 0 8163 $59,068.00 ACCT 0 5161- BUILDING 3 LAND IMPROVEMENTg $21,000.00 $19,679.69 $1,320.34 ~i "S 9UDGET REM IS GIAROED FOR VARICUB BLI. W AND LAW IMPROYEMENT6 (1) STORAGE BUu M3 -ADO PARTIAL 2NO FLOOR $12,000.00 (2) LANDSCAPWG IMPROVEMENTS PJAX),00 (3) IMPROVE ORNEWAY TO STORAGE BUILDING ^ $6,000.00 TOTAL KM A LAND IMP -ACCT 0 6151 $21000.00 ACCT 0 6155 - MISCELLANEOUS $6,605.00 $6,606.00 $0.00 REUS TW WtL NOT FR YELL IN ANCTWR CATEOORY. (1) SANK SERVICE CHARGE $:00.00 (2) FILM 6 FILM PROCESSING $1,200.00 (3) M$SCEtLANEOUS $1,00000 (p COFFEE CUPS $180.00 (5) REIMBURSING UNEMPLOYMENT - $4•000 (6) SAFE DEPOSIT BOX FOR COMPUTER TAPES $12500 J TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS - ACCT 0 6116 (ACCT / 6166.OTHER ASSETS $2,800.00 $700.00 $1,900.00 I THUS AOOOUNT 13 LGED TO PURCHASE MINOR ASSETS. 5 TOTAL OTHER ASSETS -ACCT 0 6166 $2,600.00 rt I i i Igond~No o4t~ T W6y24 r4 ti tr -r vellldal Q DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 9t6~ _ 1995 APPRAISAL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET PAGE 14 "ALL FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES" % OF DENTON OUT OF 1995 JURIopICTIpNS 1993 TOTAL COUNTY COUNTY BUDGET TAX LEVY LEVIES CHARGES CHAROES ALLOCATION SCHOOL DISTRICTS: S01 ARGYLE ISO $2,554,132.02 1.242% $29 $29, 13 $13,019 $13.929 S02 A*)BREYISD $1,225,909,46 0.596% $13,.019289 $05 DENTON ISD ,926 513,928 $05 DRUM ISO $36,722,902.87 17.852% $417,230 $417,230 S08 IAKEALLASlSD $1,273,548.39 0.619% $14,470 $14,470 509 LAKE DALLAS LlE ISD $4,152,436.63 2.019% $47,178 $47,178 SO LITTLE ELM ISD $66,970,101.97 32.555% $760,885 $760,686 31,635,299.88 0.795% $18,580 $18,580 Sill NORTHWEST ISO S42 PILOT POINT ISO St1,248,904.98 5.468% $127,805 $64,fn,J $188,898 S12 PONDER ISD $1,779,492.30 0.865,% $20,218 $13,152 $33,370 S14 P SANGER ISD $724,109.09 0.352% $8,227 $8,227 32,399,654.13 1.167% ;27264 $27,264 SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTALS 5130,_ 5$6920! 63.529% $1,484,804 $11,245 51,559,049 G01 DENTON COUNTY t 530621"171-22 f 1.888% 5317,968 $0 _ $347,968 CRIES: C28 CITY OF ARGYLE $243,450,66 0.118% I COI CITY OFAUBREY $2,766 $2,766 t C31 TOWN OF BARTONVIL.LE 380 $93,049.33 0.045% $ 910 $ $910 C03 CRY OF THE COLONY , 421.66 0.039% $ 5910 5910 $791,064.08 2.091% $48,867 $ :I C04 TOWN OFCORINTH $ $$,867 C27 TOWN OF COPPER CANYON $64,,004990.45.08 50. 5 727 1$727 .9" ,gas % 1 COS CITY OF DENTON 0,0 331% $ 5727 5727 C05 CITY OF DOUBLE OAK $4,044,520.74 6.827% $159,568 $159,568 i C07 CITY OF FLOWER MOUND $173,622.36 0.084% $:,973 $1973 J C22 TOWN OF HACKSERRY 54,677,855.71 2.274% $53,148 $53,149 ~J CIO TOWN OF HICKORY CREEK 510,503.4 0.005% $ 1119 1119 COO CITY OF HIGHLAND VLO $256,315.444 0.1 $2,912 $2,912 ~ C09 CITY OF JUSTIN $2,431,010,97 4.182% 82% $27,620 $27,620 COO CITYOFJUSTIN RUGERVItLE $116,677.61 0.058% $1,348 $1,348 I CIO CITY OFKRUM $31,830.86 0.015% $362 $78,788.61 0.038% $895 $362 C11 CRY OF LAKE DALLAS ;459,665.92 0.223% $895 C25 CITY OF LAKEWOOD VILG $21,452,94 0.010% 15, $2441 $24 $$223 C12 CITY OF LE1MSVlll15 244 C12 CITY OF LITTLE ELM $11,056,412.61 5.375% 5125,618 $91 $125,709 C23 CITY OF MARSHALLCRK 5114,34826 0.0 $1, $11,640 C33 TOWN OF NORTHLAKE 36,689.87 0.003% 25% $76 176 $76 j C24 CITY OF OAK POINT $51,631.83 0.025% $587 $839 014 CITY OF PILOT POINT $73,805.43 0.036% $839 1839 CIS CITY OF PONDER $433,815.44 9.211% $4,929 $4,929 $205 C11 CITY OFROANOKE $18,032.18 0.009% $205 5205 3205 CIO CITYOFSANGER $358,415.23 0.171% $4,012 $3.816 C28 CITY OF TROPHY CLUB $335,889.24 0.163% $3,816 53,848 $111,637.t6 0.346% _ $8085 _ 58,085 CITIES TOTALS _$41,068,648.55 19.964% $468,604 - 191 5466,695 I 0 I ` x ~ i b DENTON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT PAGE 15 1995 APPRAISAL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS WORKSHEET "ALL FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES" %OF DENTON OUT OF 1995 1993 TOTAL COUNTY COUNTY BUDGET JURISDICTIONS TAX LM LEVIES CHARGES CHARGES ALLOCATION SPECIAL DISTRICTS: W04 CLEARCREEK WATERSHED AUTHORITY $17,6-,3.96 0.009% $203 W07 CORINTH MUD $258,045.96 0125% $203 F01 DENTON COUNTY FIRE $2'932 12,932 DISTRICT $32,687.73 0,016% $371 1.01 DENTON COUNTY LEVY $371 IMPROVEMENT DIST $1 $230,645.10 0.112% $2,620 p W05 DENTON COUNTY MUD 02 $541,945.11 0263% $6,157 $6,,620 RUD DENTON COUNTY ROAD 6 ,157 16,157 UTKM DISTRICT #1 $1,538,053.77 0.748% $17,475 W03 TROPHY CLUB MUD $704,259.7) 0.342% 117,475 WOO LAKE TURNER MUD 18,002 1214 $8,215 I 5372.45 0.003% $61 SPECIAL DISTRICTS TOTALS _$3,328,643.64 1.618% $37,821 1214 38.035 GRAND TOTALS $205,710,763.63 100.000% $2,337,i98 $74550 I J~ r ~k rM -7- 9 r tiLill 3 Y y . Y 2• I. 1 ' CAPITAL EXPENDITURES PAGE IS DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION QTY. PRICE TOTAL DEPT. 1 -ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) TV, VCR 6 CAMCORDER 1 $1,400 $1,400.00 (B) FILING CABINET, LEGAL SIZE, W/LOCK 1 $300 $300.00 (C) PERSONAL COMPUTERS, WITH SOFTWARE 2 $2,500 $5,000.00 (D) PERSONAL COMPUTER 24 PIN PRINTER 2 $90 $1,600.00 (E) TAPE BACKUPS FOR PC'$ 2 5500 51,000.00 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS $9,500,00 DEPT. 2 - COMMERCIAL DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) FILING CABINET, LATERAL, 4-DRAWER, 42- W, WILOCK 1 $500 $500.00 (B) FILING CABINET, LETTER SIZE, 4-DRAWER, 28.5' D, W/LOCK 1 $260 $260.00 (C) FILING CABINET, LETTER SIZE, 2-DRAWER, 25 D. WILOCK 1 $178 3178,00 (D) PERSONAL COMPUTERS, WITH SOFTWARE 2 $2.500 $5,x'00 (E) LASER PRINTER 1 $1,500 $1,500.00 (F) MAP STORAGE CART 1 $200 $200'00 TOTAL COMMERCIAL ASSETS $7'8'8.00 34 DEPT. 3 - PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS (A) FILING CABINETS, 4-DRAWERS, W/LOCK 1 $175 $175.00 (8) WORKTABLES 1 $100 $100.00 (C) OFFICE CHAIR 1 $200 $200.00 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS $475.00 1 DEPT. 4 - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY L'FPARTMENT ASSETS (A) PERSONAL COMPUTER, WTH SOFTWARE 1 $2,500 $2,500,00 (B) PERSONAL COMPUTER 24 PIN PRINTERS 2 $900 $1,600.00 (C) TABLES FOR COMPUTERS S PRINTERS 2 550 $100'00 (D) CHAIRS 2 $350 $700.00 { TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ASSETS $5'100'00 4 DEPT. 6 - DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) TERMINALS 12 $405 $4,660,00 (B) DUAL PORT TERMINALS 2 $500 $1,000.00 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING ASSETS $5,660.00 QeR09114 ,Qenoolt 7. Tell CAPITAL EXPENDITURES PAGE 16 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION QTY. PRICE TOTAL DEPT.1 -ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) TV, VCR & CAMCOROER 1 $1'400 $1'400.00 (S) FILING CABINET, LEGAL SIZE, WILOCK 1 $300 $300.00 (C) PERSONAL COMPUTERS, WITH SOFTWARE 2 $2,500 $5,000.00 (D) PERSONAL COMPUTER 24 PIN PRINTER 2 $900 $1'800'00 (E) TAPE BACKUPS FOR PC'S 2 $500 $1,000.00 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT ASSETS $9,SD0.00 DEPT. 2 - COMMERCIAL DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) FILING CABINET, LATERAL, 4-DRAWER, 4Y W, WILOCK 1 5500 $500.00 (B) FILING CABINET, LETTER SIZE, 4-DRAWER, 26.5' D, WA.OCK 1 $280 $280.00 (C) FILING CABINET, LETTER SIZE, 2-DRAWER, 254 D, W/LOCK 1 $176 $176.00 (D) PERSONAL COMPUTERS, WITH SOFTWARE 2 $2,500 $5,000.00 (E) LASER PRINTER 1 $1,500 51,500.00 (F) MAP STORAGE CART 1 $200 $200.00 TOTAL COMMERCIAL ASSETS $7'656.00 DEPT. 3 - PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS (A) FILING CABINETS, 4-DRAWERS, W/LOCK 1 $175 5175.00 (B) WORKTABLES 1 $100 $100.00 (C) OFFICE CHAIR 1 $200 1200,D0 TOTAL PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSETS $475.00 ~J DEPT. 4 - RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) PERSONAL COMPUTER, WITH SOFTWARE 1 $2,500 $2,500.00 (B) PERSONAL COMPUTER 24 PIN PRINTERS 2 $900 $1,600.00 (C) TABLES FOR COMPUTERS d PRINTERS 2 $50 $100.00 (D) CHAIRS 2 $350 $700.00 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ASSETS $5,100.00 DEPT. 5 - DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) TERMINALS 12 $405 $4,860.00 (B) DUAL PORT TERMINALS 2 $500 $1'000.00 $5.860.00 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING ASSETS 4wasn~ gy.Do13 ,tlenOaS S >aIE ~ 7 T / r ` A f e + F A 7 e r Y CAPITAL EXPENDITURES PAGE 17 DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION QTY. PRICE TOTAL DEPT. 6 - APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) LATERAL FILE CABINET, 4 DR, WILOCK 5580 5580.00 (B) HEAVY DUTY TABLE TOP LINE PRINTERS 3 $3,000 $9,000.00 TOTAL APPRAISAL SUPPORT ASSETS $9,580.00 DEPT. 7 - RESEARCH 3 TRANSFER ASSETS 4 (A) DRAFTING STOOLS 3 $172 $518.00 1 (B) MICROFILM CASSETTE CABINET 1 $750 $750.00 TOTAL RESEARCH & TRANSFER ASSETS $1,266.00 I DEPT. 6 - LAND DEPARTMENT ASSETS (A) LATERAL FILING CABINET, 4 DRAWER 1 $500 5500,00 (B) PERSONAL COMPUTER, WITH SOFTWARE 1 $2,500 $2,500.00 (C) PERSONAL COMPUTER 24 PIN PRINTER 1 $900 $900.00 TOTAL LAND DEPARTMENT ASSETS $3.900.00 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $43,317.00 , i ,L g60Qi 10 • +gor>slas 1l16 ~ ~ ~ 1 A '.i P , sa99d~it SALARIES SCHEDULE PAGE 18 late 2 1995 TITLE SALARY ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT: CHIEF APPRAISER $62,256.28 DEPUTY CHIEF APPRAISER $50,813.90 DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION $49,171.38 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $31,378.28 RECORDS MANAGER $28,135.74 SUPPLEMENTS S AGENT FORMS MANAGER $30,300.03 MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEE $16,000.00 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY $43,361.01 SENIOR COMMERCIAL APPRAISER $30,988.38 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER $24,242.73 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER $20,516.14 COMMERCIAL APPRAISER $24,242.73 INFORMATION SPECIALIST $18,041.95 t COMMERCIAL APPRAISER (HALF TIME EMPLOYEE) $10,000.00 't LAND DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR - LAND $48,227.50 SENIOR LAND APPRAISER $32,219.18 I LAND APPRAISER $26,797.08 FILING CLERK (PART-TIME) $2,000.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR-PERSONAL PROPERTY $39,135.43 SENIOR APPRAISER-PERSONAL PROPERTY $30,327.52 PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $20,170.90 PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $25,251.88 INFORMATION SPECIALIST $17,889.30 APPRAISAL ASSISTANT (PART-TIME) $3,000.00 r j RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT: I APPFWSAL SUPERVISO,'t-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY $39,894.35 { SENIOR APPRAISER-RE'IDENTIAL PROPERTY $29,005.39 I RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $24,718.63 RESIDENTIAL P %OPERTYAPPRAISER $24,250.98 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $20,516.14 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $24,242.73 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $19,846.16 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISER $18,763.63 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK $15,238.94 INFORMATION SPECIALIST $17,889.30 FILE CLERK, 2 EA. (PART-TIME) $1,600.00 SUPPORT CLERK, 2 EA. (PART-TIME) $1,920.00 HOUSE SCALER, 2 EA. (PART-TIME) $8,640.00 Yr~ T, C A r 1A x qWaNo go,. ) SALARIES SCHEDULE PAGE 19 1943 TITLE SALARY APPRAISAL SUPPORT DEPARTMENT: APPRAISAL SUPPORT 1J.ANAGER $43,381.01 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK -11 $20,033.38 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK -1 $17,890,84 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK -1 $17,890.84 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK -1 $17,890.84 APPRAISAL SUPPORT CLERK -1 $17,890.84 RECEPTIONIST $15,559.39 FILE CLERK (PART-TIME) $1.620.00 DATA PROCESSING PERSONNEL: DATA PROCESSING MANAGER $42,098.07 SENIOR INFORMATION SPECIALIST $23,818.59 MICROCOMPUTER SPECIALIST $24,055.93 RESEARCH IL TRANSFER PERSONNEL: RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECH, RI $30.889,91 SENIOR RESEARCH 6 TRANSFER TECH. 11 $21,887.10 RESEARCH 6 TRANSFER TECHNICIAN 1 $18,357.75 RESEARCH 3 TRANSFER TECHNICIAN 1 $18,357.75 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN 1 $17,889.30 RESEARCH & TRANSFER TECHNICIAN N $15,724.20 i TOTAL $1,294,007,22 I 4 i 1 } 4 j r i1 J aoeaOaHo au -d ~ 3 1995 BUDGET/SALARY SURVEY PAGE 20 06121194 7 %OF WIN MAX Erdky Jurlsdktfon at "Aa SurreyRaulls MIN MAX LEVY LEVY WOT WOT Oct tveopra of z% 53-04 1.0% 2.0% WAVIXN.22 11 02211% 0. C06 CIy of Dorton CMy pave on on jr wW of 4.6% to emplo" 9194 4.6% 4.6% 14,044.,,20.74 10.140% OAeb% 0.40e% CO? Town cf Flow Mound Cost of"adju4trtwnt (cola) • 2.5% 9194 2,5% 5.0% 4,677,855.77 3.377% 0,064% 0.109% Matt pay based on Mort • 2.5% COP City of JwOn 5% Ww" in lost ardpa! 9394 5.0% 5.0% 115877e1 0.006% 0,004% 0.0041< C10 Cry of Krum Aeraa Ora board 3%S% 9394 3.0% 50% 78,79e $I 0.057% 0.002% 0103% C11 Coy 0 Lake Was Merdmum sa" k,craee 3% 93-94 3.0% 3,0% 459,695,92 0.332% 0,010% 0110% 113 Cty of Lkda Elm Sakrry hereeee • 0% 9304 0.0% 0.0% 114,348,28 0.104% 0.0004 0.01016 r C14 Cty of Pfbt Polrt 5% hu40ee for empla" 9394 5.0% 5.0% 433,045A1 0,313% 0,016% 0.010% C17 Cty of Rwoke Nd red receive heraa 9394 0.0% 0.0% 368,415.23 0259% 0000% 0,000% C19 Town of Hickory Crack 511 CM of Livkq 9394 5.0% 5.0% 250,31544 0.185% 0.009% 0,009% i C23 Town of Marshall Creek Mc ntarw" Man tram 3a 7S to fib 00 9194 16.5% 10.5% CAN 87 0405% 0.001% 0001% } C20 "of Arpyk 3% k crseea sffectW t0-0 •93 9394 3.0% 3.0% 243,450.06 0.170% 0.006% 0,006% Cv Town of Copper Cenycn Town Secretary $,SO robe 9394 0.0% 0.0% 64,004,45 0 040% 0000% 0000% C28 Town of Trophy Club Vsrlan rsIm bsaed on )cb Ik*Rvpe 4%4 5% 9394 4.0% 0.5% 711,837.18 0,514% am % 0.033% C31 Town of Bartw tlo Town Secretary hom $9.00 To $9.50 per rspuiar hours 9194 5.5% 5.5% 80,127.ee 0058% 0003% 0003% from $9.50 fa mWnps (weninps) to $50.00 per haw 501 Argo* ISO 3% for FY 9594 3.0% 3.O% 2,554,132 02 1444% 0065% 0.065% 807 Kant ISO On an mrspe of 4% 9194 4.0% 4,0% 1,273,E48 39 0 920% 0037% 0,037% S06 Lake Daea ISO A". 3% Twhwo 3A% olhars 3.6% 9594 3.0% 35% 4,152,436.63 2 NO% 0.090% 0,114% SOD 1.4401sy ie ISO Sal" AdNWjrwdof 3% 9394 3.0% 3.0% 00,97.101.97 48.352% 1.465% 1.451% S11 Northwest ISO Profe&%WWvWParsprofrsslorWAvg 5% 9194 5,0% 5,0% 11248,904.96 8.122% 0.406% 0.406% 3.9% 4.3% 130,504,25624 100.00% 2.9% 32% 'AVG. •AVO. ' 20 TAXING UNITS REPORTING i r h i ~COUNCI I i 41 to 0 Q ~ r 4 r ° GGUu'"~~OJ I I b"Y K^ t f Ll'/ n.I oaa _ o~y r CITY of AENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEMON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8307 Office of the :"''Y Manager MEMORANDUM TOt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager } PROMS Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager s } DATE: July 13, 1994 SUBJECTS Early Warning System i r Attached is Chief Cook's memorandura giving some rough estimates of costs for the early warning system as well as some advantages and disadvantages. An early warning system was considered in the Capital Improvement Plan a couple of years ago. From the minutes of Council meetings and P & Z meetings, we determined that the system was deleted from the CIP in 1992. I'vr also attached a memo from Richard Foster. It indicates how emergency information will he provided for cable TV broadcasting. of course, all of this weather information is monitored and f vorffied by the Ham Radio Club here in town. They do this through actual club members who volunteer their time in emergencies to actually send people into the field to monitor a report on =ctual conditions. Over the years, they have provided invaluable assistance to our police and fire departments. If the Chief or I can provide further information, we would be happy to try and provide it to you or the Council at your convenieurg. R c Svehla Deputy City Manager RS:bw J,. AMMO 0 51B Attachments t; "Dedicated to Quality Servire" i /~aT s Y i t ti A ,e No 23 Agend i S i , , ` < n AM10 #94-066 CAL 12 W4 l ~M TO: Mr. R. svehla, Deputy city manager FROMI J. L. Cook, Jr., Fire Chief DATEt 12 July, 1994 REt OUTDOOR WARNING SYSTEM Representatives of Federal Signal Corporation, a manufacturer of outdoor warning systems, recently surveyed the City in order to determine the number and type of outdoor warning sirens that would be required to properly alert residents in the event of an emergency. The survey was based upon the recommendations contained in FEMA Publication CPC-1-171 Outdoor Warning Systems Guide (March 1980). The survey determined that the ideal warning system would require a minimum of sixteen sirens. i The total final cost of a complete outdoor warning system will be dependent upon the number and type of warning devices installed as well as the types of ancillary devices that are included. For k example, the cost could be as much as $30,000 per siren if it was E installed with battery back-up, radio controls, and silent testing. A full-blown system with all the bells tnd whistles with sixteen sirens could cost as much as $480,000. Less expensive systems are a available, of course. Fewer oirens could be installed or less expensive sirens could be purchasP.d. It might also be possible to ~J have the City Electric Department donate the installation of the sirens. There is not universal agreement as to the desirability and effectiveness of an outdoor warning system. Therefore, I have 14sted some the advantages and disadvantages of installing a system. Advantages: 1. As many as 98% of the population of the city could possibly be alerted by a properly engineered and functioning system. 2. While sirens are not the complete answer, they are another tool in the effort to warn as many people as possible. i i i E i 4 I ~ R ti ~gartdaNo. wi Agendal te ~l Memo 194-066 7~7 Outdoor Warning Systems Page 2 of 2 3. The City has the responsibility to warn its residents in the event of an emergency. The installation of an outdoor warning system would fulfill a major portion of this responsibility and might possibly reduce or limit the city's liability. Disadvantages: 1. The system would be difficult and expensive to maintain. There are no funds presently allocated for this expense. 2. The sirens can not be heard inside most modern automobiles and/or buildings. The system will not warn the hearing impaired either. 3. People may panic if the sirens are sounded and actually leave a safe area 2nd place themselves in harm's way. At a minimum they will jam the E-911 system. 4. Many people will object to the noise when, the system is tested and will complain to both staff and elected officials. They may also object to the appearance of the sirens and not want them installed near their home or business. 5. If a siren fails to sound and someone is injured or killed, the City's liability may actually increase. 6. The system is very expensive. The decision as to which sirens to install and which to omit may well become a I' political issue if the city can not afford the complete { system. { I have tried to provide an objective overview of the advantages and 3 disadvantages of an outdoor warning system. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. JLC/bf ,l s Y 4 .i r~_9,~ a42.3 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 15, 1994 TO: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager FROM: Richard Foster, Public Information Officer SUBJECT: CABLE TV EMERGENCY OVERRIDE The Cable TV Franchise Agreement states that the franchisee (Sammons) "shall provide and maintain the equipment necessary for the City to override, by remote control, the audio and/or video signal to transmit a message regarding a bona fide emergency over all cable video channels simultaneously. 11 My understanding is that such a system used to exist, but it was dismantled Emergency Management Coordinator position moved out of City Hall. ~ We plan to reinstall the system with a telephone located Police at Department dispatch center he The Sammons engineer has assured me that the system ncould be upland running by the time the Police Department moves in the middle of August. I will be asking Sammons to contact Gary Collins to discuss details of the dedicated phone line which would be required. I will keep you updated on this as more information becomes available. s- Vv R c and Foster r„ WP AAA02745 R° 8s, wCITY~. 'COUNCI M I w.. I 1r I' Q 1 p f ~ 41t ~ O Si a 0 e ~ • ~N Go0Q0 I r e r . r, i CITY 01 DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM y TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager z i r FROM: Betty Mclean, Executive Director I Municipal services/Economic Development. r h , DATE: July 15, 1991 s SUBJECT: Participation in the North Texas Commission The mission of the Korth Texas Commission is an follows: s "lhe :worth Texas Commission (N.T.O.I is a not,-profit, city, chamber, university and private sector membership-supported organization which seeks to combine the vast resources of the r North Texas region to maximize the visibility of the Metroplex and raise the level of awareness of the area nationally and a internationally as an excellent place to lire and dry business. Within that framework, the commission will develop data, facilitate regional interaction and unity on significant I regional issues and be the cataly,;t for programs which can best be carried out on a regional basis.'' { The City of Denton/Chamber of Commerce have been members of the 1t North Texas Commission since 1977. Currently our membership dues are $4,265.32. The membership dues are paid out of the Utility Department's Economic Development Fund as part of our contract with the Chamber of Commerce. The matter of our participation in the North Texas Commission was discussed previously- by City Council on October, 21, 1986 and No -mber 41 1986 (see Attachment A). For those discussions, Chuck a Cv penter submitted a letter of support for our continued ` participation (see Attachment B). As a result of the presentation ! by representatives from the North Texas commission back in 1986, the City Council reconfirmed our commitment to regionalisn and our r continued participation. Probably the most active member of this commqnity in a leadership role with the North "rcxas Commission has been Ai fred Hurley, Chancellor of the University of tiorth Texas. His role in the f furtherance of regional unity is outlined in a letter from Robert I L. Herchert, Chairman of the Board, and the accompanying North ',.;•~I Texas Commission news release of June 28, 1991 lsee Attachment C). .1 8171568.8200 D/FW METRO 434-2529 e w r: t . ~QNdlNO 4 10~ 9 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ME40RANDUM TO: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager n~ FROM: Betty McKean, Executive Director Municipal Services/Economic Develolment DATE: July 15, 1991 SUBJECT: Participation in ,he North Texas Commission The mission of the North Te>.as Commission is as follows: r, "The North Texas Commission IN.T.C.I is a non-profit, city, chamber, university and ptivate sector morrbership-supported organization which seeks to cumtrine Ott- east resources of the North Texas region to maximize the cisibiliLy of the Metroplex and raise the level of awareness of the area nationally and internationally as an excellent place to li%e arid do business. 4 within that framework, the commission will develop data, 1 facilitate regional interaction and unity on significant regional issues and be the catalyst for programs which can best be carried out on a regional basis." i The City of Denton/Chamber of Commerce have been members of the North Texas Commission since 1977. Currently our membership dues are 34,265.32. The membership dues are paid out of the Utility Department's Economic Development Fund its part of our contract with the Chamber of Commerce. The matter of our participation in the North Texas Commission was discussed previously by City Council on October 21, 1986 and November 4, 1986 (see Attachment AI. For those discussions, Chuck Carpenter submitted a letter of support for our continued participation (see Attachment B). As a result of the presentation by representatives from the North Texas Commission back in 1985, " the City Council reconfirmed our commitment to regionalism and our continued participation. V. + z I Probably the most active member of this communit,r in a leadership role with the North Texas Commission has been Alfred Hurley, i Chancellor of the University of North Texas. His role in the j! furtherance of regional unity is outlined in it letter from Robert L. Herchert, Chairman of thr Poard, and the accompanying North Texas Commission news release of June 28, 1991 (see Attachment C). 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 . J 1Y i 1 'may ~ • You may recall that the relative success in the major competition for the Matsushita Corporation n numher of years ngo way, broughL about thruugh very close cooperation and referral from the North Texas Commission. The North Texas Commission continues to play n very strong role in economic dovelupment campaigns rind major marketing efforts. I have included the falling background information for your review (see Attachment D1: • History of the North Texas Commission (Attachment D-11 • North Texas Commission Profile - Statement of Purpose (Attachment D-2) • North Texas Commission Board of Direc.tDrs (Attachment D-3) Listing of the accomplishments of the %urLh. Texas Commission from October 1993 to March 1994. It is clearly evident that the ^th Texas commission has been representing on, as 1 as other North Texas communities, on major r gional and national issues. Simply by our continued association with this outstanding group of leaders we geir+ an excellenL return for a eery minimal investment. (Attachment D-4) Also included is a listing of the many data bases that 7 are provided through the North Texas Commission. They provide support, to us in preparation of prospectus for industrial prospects. (Attachment D-5) List of Area Member Cities (Attachment : 6) J Complete Public/Private Membership List (Attachment D-71 i. I'll be happy to respond to further questions on this matter. I have enclosed a current letter from Chuck Carpenter Isee Attachment E). The North Texas Commission has also volunteered to meet with individual council members or make a formal presentation at future 1 City Council meetings. i ecutive Director ' etty 0SCrvEiCXeS11.con elopment Hunicipomic Dev f r, k s ABB002D6 lM'k + } J ' I 4 1 i i r Q80tl8M0 -!J.a' {pen4a11 Oate -~3 CITY ofDENTON,TEXAS MUN;CIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (8171566-8200 MEMORANDUM DATE; July 5, 1994 TO: Mayor, Members of the Denton City Council and Lloyd Hariell, City Manager t FROM: Jerry Cott, Council Member, District 4 Denton City Council SUBJECT: NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION Colleagues, may we please discuss, at your earliest convenience, the rules under which we, the City of Denton, will participate in the organization, the North Texas Commission. This conversation will probably apply to most other organizations that attempt to organize the region at the sacrifice for each individual or some part of itself. I am sure we each have some thoughts, and it would be ray wish to discuss this when there is a moment in the next week or two. i I Jer Cot - WP AAA025CI S 1-~ 1 ff' .u S , gerttlaNfl ~ - 4~endalt Oats ®r- ty 1 Minutes ~0~39 Octocer 21, 'q 1, :336 ATTACHMENT A :re Council convened Into the work Session at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Cefeise ROOM of the Municipal aul:ding. ?R?SENT: Mayor Stepnenss Maycr Pro Ter Alford; Council Me,Moers Alexander, C-e'•, McAdams and Aiddlesperger city Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary A34EN7: CbanCll Member 40pKins was art of town on vacation The Co:ncil r,eld a discussion on proposed preliminary plat of tne rig art Addition, a development planned on 7 acres ceginning ad:acent and south of FM 2idl, across from Hickory Creek Mobile Home ?ark, approximately 1.1 miles south of Hickory Creek Road within the ex::aterritcrial :arisdiction of the City of Denton for the p rpose of determining vhetner to cegin the annexation process. David Ellison, Senior ?lamer, clarified the area in question on a Tap wnici displayed ene City of Penton and City of Corinth agreement line. If a SO9 feet strip was annexed, cne total area Would Le appro ximately 43 acres. Ine Hickory Creek Mobile Hone ?&:K vas slightly offset from cne proposed annexation site to tie north and , east. Tne issue which had triggered the discussion of annexation was a proposal for a light aauminum metal fabrication plant on :nis tract. The proposed use would nave 170 feet of frontage on FM 216: And .was sd:scent to the east to ene ]aymar commercial p.sm :hg facility. Tne Planning staff felt this area couaa no longer 0e considered as remote aue to the ticKory Creek Montle home ?ark and Jaymar. A plat had not yet been filea for the proposed meta: fabrication plant. There were various alternatives the :ouncii ca:ld consider. If ene Council directed staff to cegin annexation procedure: at this time, the annexation process Could take approximately five months to complete. During this time, the deveaoper could file a preliminary ono final pint ono cegin consccuct wn. If this occurred, zoning would not ce an issue. however, it a proolem arose with the plats or Other pro,:ed:ral matters, the City could complete the annexation and er.e developer -would ce required to petition for light industrial zoninq pricr to construction. The question was whether to begin annexation :a Benefit tnls use and other uses and cry to stop lignt industrial strip uses or not. The oown aide vas the impeding of possio:e employment generating operations. Ellison further reported that Council could direct staff to begin annexation on just this parcel, or a larger area it to only monitor activity at this time. He then presented slides of the entire area. I Tne consensus of the Council was to proceed with annexation procedures for a 500 feet or 1,900 feet strip so as to care in the specific tract being targeted for the metal fabrication plant. 2. The Council held a discussion regarding future membership In the North Texas Commission. i City Manager Lloyd Harrell reportea tnat this item had oven i discussed by the Council on October 7. Council had tequested staff to contact the Chamber of commerce to get their opinion. The agenaa back-up material included a letter from Chuck Carpenter of :ne chamber as well !a ' 14 P.'-^ . *a.n. n(, 1•k lP rh• 4rP4 -w nn were memoets of the North Texas Commission. Mr. Carpenter's letter ` stated that the Chamber felt tnere was value in remaining in the Commission, but suggested the city consider a $1,000 membership rather than the more expensive full membership. However, staff did not feel the $1400 membership would be useful. A survey of other cities had supported the opinion that the City probsoly would not recoup the membership fee Investments hcvever, the North Texas Commission with economic development on a regional scale. t s - - +gendaNo 3- ~ , G egeodaltem WD Meet :mg of Jctocer 21, i336 S~ S r~ Page 2 ~R f~ Mayor S:epnens stated that he had spoken with Cnancellor Hurley of North :exas State University. Dr. parley felt the new leadersmip at ...e :;or-m Texas Commission would be moving toward nigh tech ho ::9y ventures which would benefit not only the university, out the :o,:, m;.1 as :ell. Council Member Alexander stated he felt this issue should ce reviewed carefully and it would ce dnwise for the City of Denton to withdraw from tae North Texas Commission at this time. Council Member Riddlesperger stated me felt Denton should be a part of this regional organization in light of the commitment to ecenomi: development. Council memcer Chew stateo that me would like to nave the :xe:utive Director appeared before the Council and discuss wnat tae :;ortn .'exas Commission was currently doing. -he consensus of the Council was to invite staff representatives { from the Nortn Texas Commissicn to meet with the City Counci. on "ovemoer 4 at the 6:00 p.m, work session. ( { 3. The Council considered giving staff direction regsrdiaq engimeet ing work on the oak- Hickory s treet improvement project. RICK Sven Ia, Assistant City Manager, reported that several .ptions were availaole. Both Oak and Hickory could be converted to sit one-way from 3onnie Brae to the Downtown Square. For the section it Avenue C, one option was three lanes of 37 feet width or three lines of 45 feet width. The 45 feet width would allow for a parking lane: nodever, the 37 feet width would be less costly. The design shout: ce decided on as quickly as possiole due to the process of having to go through the Citizens Tra tie Safety Support Commission prior to final approval oy the city Council. All of this would have co ce accomplished oefore bidding and construction could begin. Council Member Alexander stated that he had received telephone calls i from residents on Oak Street who were concerned that the change would increase traffic flow. This, coupled witn the loss of on-street parking spaces, would have an adverse effect on the neighbornocd. Svenla reported that this project could ee delayed until the first of tha year. 4. The Council received a report on the Utility Department Manelement Study by Dr. Littlefield. City Manager Lloyd Harrell called on Mr. Roland Laney, Chairman of the Public Utilities' Board, to introduce Dr. Littlefield. Mr. Roland Laney stated that the Public utilities' Board hao seen a need for this type study two years ago. Tnis was a preliminary study exploring now the Utility Department operated and interface: with other City departments prior to the tocnhical study vhicn .as tequired oy the City Charter. In* purpose of the study was to establish goals for the Utility Department prior to hiring a consultant to perform the rnlli4 &A f'.a.ow• e*i.AM, Dr. Littlefield reported that this study had focused on opportunities to improve management and to make a good utility system even better by obtaining ideas from within the system. Input had been received Cram approkimately thirty-five utility manager level persons as wall au personnel from other departments. He had played a coordinating role in the information gathering process. This had lead to constructive discussions and many good ideas had been expressed and subsequently implemented. Dr. Littlefield then gars an overview of thl organization of the study. P gdaoa n lgendait S Council yinutes Ndvemcer 4, lye6 :he Council convened Into the :.urK Session at x:30 P.M. to the Civil Def.:n.se Room of the :!unicLpal BJi)oin;. ?RESE:•;: +.a'/or Stephens; ndyor Pro ten Alfora; Councu Xemc,erx Aldxancer, Lhew, hepkins, N.cAcanis and 810olesperyer City Manager, City Attorney ana city Secretary ABSENT: Nune L. :he Coane11 receives An uouate un tiow xemurLal ri.spiti transter. _ ihis 1tea vas taken unuer the txec~tive Seaslun. 2. Litigation Phis item vas taken under the Executive Sesblun. iI 3. :t.e Uo+ nciL convenEa into the txetutive Session to CiSCuas 1 legal matters, real estate, personnel/ouaru appuintxents. r.v official actitn •wds taken. 1r.e Council ccnieu~a intu tl;e 'dock Session at v:UU p.m. in u.e Crvll Cetense Ro'.,m ;t the -1un1c1pal Builainy. }.ayrr Stdrhens; .a3yor rru :e.. Ahura; ~OUnCIi Aidxan-ir, Chew, hCpK1nS, ;•.Cn3AIS ins .l1 U^a lc9~ef :ef 'Lty ll3udy e'r, City Attorney anu CLty 62Cretarf As1;E:.T: 'Nuns 1. :te Cuuncil received a presentation rru,n representative3 ut I the Turth Texas Curmisslun. ar. t.orch Make, Presioent of the :+ortn wxa* Cunmisarun, Lntrouuce Ms. Theresa Lhrelksla, Ur. Al Hurley and Ur. by Lyon. no stateu that the strength of the Cummraslcn was in its ataloer cities ana Denton was a strung city. Ln 1984, the CVZISsion had eejun tocusing on a tliyh tech center. Dt. Al Hurley, Chancellur ut t.orth Texas State lniversity, stated that the North Texas Commission summed up the recognition of the fact that the various entities involved must cooperate to pull the region together. Tne Commission had worked with tt.e i.allas-Fort ;,ortn Airyort ana was now working toward a high tecu center. the Commission would serve as the catalyst to orrng together the universities, industrial members and governmental yrents in t:lia area. Mr. Blake then distrLbuted packets of intormation frun the Commission on vatious projects which were currently underway. Dr. Hy Lyon, rector of the North Texas Cut.mission high tech task force, stated that this particular thrust was motivated Lq a nur,oer of analysis which had been perfotmed. A 1964 survey of university research and development funding in the retroplex showed a total or $11,000,000. According to per capita figures, the total should have been ;SUO,O00,UUO. A coelltion had Bern tormea to go after tt.esA research dollars which would assist in austaininy gruwth tot t region. 2. The council considered yiviny stetf direction regaroiny eagineeting wVrK on the OAK-Hickory Street improvement project. Jun to tl.^.e constraints, this item .'as caasea in the ayenoa utter to d ',w i t. aenoatrt,. tgendaitem S t ~ Q gte rr"` 1 ~3 g Cvunctl .Hinuces t.ovemoer 4, ibdo 1ne CounctI convened Into tee l.vrk Session at t:30 p.m. In the Clvi1 Defense Room cf the Xunicipal Bjiiolny. P3 ESE:.:; !ayvr Stephens; nayur Fro ten Aiforc, Council xeniers Alexancer, Lnew, aOrkina, MCACV13 and dl Colesperyer Llty Manager, city Attorney anu Lity Secretary A3SLNI: t+c,ae 1. he Council receiveo an upuate un kiew Yemvrial -..~spitA tcanster. i:~is lten was taken unuer the ixtCUtive Se S,sivn. ` 2. Litigation itils item was taken unGer the executive Ses511.n. SAe council convened Into the 1kecutive Svs4lun to clscuis 1 r legal mattors, real eutate, personnel/ovaru appotn trenta. r.v offtetai action was taken. 'ILL .ounci,l con/eue0 into t,'.e :,ork sesstin at u;Lu p.r:. In the LLVli 0etense Roum :t the munlcLial Builuiny. }.ay::r Sterr.anst A3y Jr rru :eta Altorc; ~GUrcL. '.e'...rS Aitkan:dr, C're'w, n0i'K1n S, P.C A:2t3 alto dlCdleSrct=tr :icy ±anay_r, Lity AttOroey anu city :eCretarr AaSE:.T: :w'ne 1. :ht Council reCeLved a eras enta clan tr~,a reiresentat t vea GC JI the North Texas Cvrm.lastun. hr. '..orth blake, President of the :+ortn exas Cvmmtsatun, intrOuucc ks. Theresa Inrelkeld, Or. Al huclsy at.d Lc. by Lytn. no atatau that the Strength of the Commission was in its i.krloer titles and Uenton was a Strong city. In 1984, the Corimisslon had cejun tocusing on a hvih tech center. Dc. Al duriey, Chancelluc tic North 'iexas State university, stated that the North Texas Commission summed up tt.e recugnitton ur the fact that the various entities involved must cooperate to pull the region together. Ins Commission had worKed with tie ualias-Fort "Ortn Airport anU WAS now working toward a nigh tecu center. the Commission would set we as the catalyst to cring together the universities, inoustridi memoers ano guvernmentil grants in tnls area. Mr. Blake then dlstcibuted packets of information Eton the Commission on.various projects which were currently underway. Dr. Hy Lyon, member of the North texas Cuntllssion high tech task force, sated that this 4•arttcular thrust was motivated Oy a nurse: of analysts which had been performed. A 19d4 survey of unlversity research and development funding in the metroplex snowed a total or S11,000,00U. According to per capita figures, the total should have been SSUO,O00,UOU. A coalition had been tormed to go after tr,tSO research dollars which would assist in sustaining gruwth tog tt region. } 2. the Lrl h considered yiviny statf direction regaroiny engineering wUrA un the Gax-hickory street impruvenent project. wUi to tine Con Y_ralnts, this item das }a5atd in the ayenoa vrcet to I I~ i ATTACHMENT B t 17 • 1► ^rNo qy` t~ta I -9U 70-~ 3 October 15, 1986 Mr. Lloyd Ifarrell City Manager City of Denton 2I S Fast McKinney f Denton, TX 76201 Dear Lloyd: Thank you for your letter of October 9 requesting the opinion of the chamber regarding the City of Denton's renewal or it.; membership in the North Texas Commission. First, I would point out that the opinions expressed In this correspondence reflect my own personal viewpoint and should not be considered an official statement of the Denton Chamber of Commerce. As you know, all official positions of the chamber are determined by its 25-member board of directors, and I would not want to presume the feelings of the board individually or collectively. In theory, I personally approve of and support those things the North Texas Commission stands for and represents. No doubt, there ne" to be an entity which unifies and promotes the diverse collection of communities known as the Dallas-Fort Worth Mcwplex. An obvious point for debate would then center around whether or not the Council in fait considers the City of Denton a viable part of the Metroplex? Origijwlly, the North Texas Commission was organized to inarket the Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airporil It then made an attempt to serve as a major economic development umbrella organization. Over the years, both of these roles have been diminished significantly, and subsequently I understand one of the Commission's major areas of emphasis has now been directed toward developing and promoting the Iligh Technology resourees of the area. The Commission has recently hired and contracted with individuals who are considered experts In thls particular field. DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE I ti Loyd Harrell bQ90d8No October 1S, 1986 Page -2- AnWAIArn Ilala 7 ~~39 Part of the Commission's program for accomplishing the aforementioned High Technology mission includes a consortium of aii institutions of higher learning in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. I understand that Dr. Al Burley, president of North Texas Stale University, was involved in the iniUni task force to study and implement this program, If you have not already done so. I would suggest that you also solicit his opiniorm on this matter. I feel that it is also important to point out that orgeni7,itttonc such as chambers of commeree, and the North Texas Commission in particular, are quite often misunderstood and rarely given credit for their efforts and accomplishments. For the most part, funding is dedicat srt to Krneral operalions and a staff :o provide a basic structure through which mnnv different irv,es and needs can be ' addressed. By Design, nor.-profit staff exerultvrs tend to remain -sehind the scenes and low key in their presence. One of the mcawres of our succ± s Is based on ` our ability to n%scmble the eoproprinte drlegnttan of voluntecr~ to "mat things happen" if you will. Structurally the North Tcxns Commission is much like a chamber of commerce, however it has obviously bt.ilt its reputation and power base on key lndivlduats frorr, the cities of Dallas and Fort Worth. Traditionally, tlc suburbs r+;d outlying citEcs have not had much of a voice in the overall policies and direction of the e Corti mission. 1 ' Personally, i have no quarrel or concern with ;his particular practice, but I am aware that it is perhaps offensive to some. I do, however, feel confident .hat Denton's visibility and economic import in the future will eventually give it more recognition within the Gallas-Fort worth apca. J Although I am concerned about the $4,400 price tai{, especially with our many needs for specific services rigid here at home, I would not want to appear defensive when I say that now is not the time to withdraw finnnciri! sgtpQort for promotional organizations. Tho Denton Chamber is presently fecing some abnormally high membership attrition problems, even though its primary focus, as you know, is to promote and sustain a local climate for sound and quality economic krowlh. Everyone benefits from the creation of new Jobs and nn expanding tax base, both the results of an effective economic development program. As a matter of record, 1 plan to recommend that the Dent,tn Chamber of Commerce retain its $100 membership in the Norl', Texas Commission in the 1981.88 Annual Budget. As I understand the dui., srhedule, all chambers of commerce pay the same minimum amount. In additior„ l would also recommend (list tar City of Denton retain its membership In the North Texas Commission, but at a much lower rate. If acceptable by both parties, the Council might want to corsider 61,006, eith the understanding that Mis figure would t>c re-eval_,atcd when the City audget is more capable of supporttrg a larger amount. t. t , ~anCtNo. Z- Lloyd I{arrell S~ October 15, 1986 Ape>ftdal C Page -J- oala 7- Either way, I certainly understand and appreciate thr epiestions presented by the City Council and will be happy to respond further on f l iv matter if requested. Sinc c~. C% Char es . Cerpe4ce President B Cone rat Slam. r i C WC/ms i I { i 1 , ATTACHMENT C JUN 3 Q 1594 NORTH TEXAS CUS1SlISSIOV EC-;vOMiC oEVELOPMERT June 29, 1994 r~A11daH0. ©~c-3 - AWdall S Oeis Ms. Betty McKean Executive Director Municipal Services! Economic Development City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Betty, Enclosed is a copy of a recent North Texas Commission news release relating to regional unity and cooperation. We have sent a copy of this release to k'ou, as well as to many other city officials across the Metroplex, because we thought you might find it of interest. The North Texas Commission has recently formed an advisory committee headed by Dr. Alfreo 'iisrley and 1. Peter Kline to focus special attention on the issue of regional unity, a subject which has been the underpinning of our programs for many years. In our research so far it has become clear that the Metroplex is in a fierce competition with the other regions of the country and world for limited Investment capital, government funding and economic development. Studies also show that those regions which do he best in these competitions are those which can show strong cohesion and the ability to work together. I We at the North Texas Commission see internal divisiveness as he biggest threat to Metroplex 1 , prosperity. This is not to say that here will no competition within the region. Intra•regiona competition can be healthy, especially if it means that the Metroplex has a stronger product with which to compete with other regions. We must remember, however, that we are allies and not enemies, even if at times we are competin; for the same prize. It is certainly possible to represent one's city's interests without having animosity toward other competing city officials. It is in everyone's best interests to handle these regional rivalries in a mature way. The very person i that you may be competing against today, may be your strongest ally on another project sees the cracks. it is the windows of the Mcuoplw. which hn int broken, comnd the whole world rock throwing It is the sincere hope of the North Texas Commission that competitions among the cities of the, Metroplex be conducted in an o[pplcen and respectful manner and that the winners be determined the not, to movetahead isetogether.r. we he S3mC may compe te among ours lsal ves forkoarse it In the alhestl in may Pe Si rely yours, . ~ Robert L Herelic rt Deaa H. Vanderbilt Chairman President t J For more Information contact: Salty Campbell Vice President, Communications 752Box 810248 NEWS o~ AIrpoM T~ NTC* '75281. (214) 621-0400 (Metro) NOMM 7EMCOMM `t.SiON (2!4) 739-4547 (evening) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: June 28, 1994 Vg~311 S Additional Contacts: 081E 7- u Robert L. Herchert, NTC Chairman, 817.735-7372 Alfred F. Hurley, Regional Unity Co-Chainnan, 817.267.0652 1. Peter Kline, Regional Unity Co-Chaitman, 214.980 4170 North Texas Commission says key to Metroplex prosperity is regional unity Th: Board of Directors of the North Texas Commission (NTC) this month pa.ied a resolution calling for a renewed emphasis on regional unity and cooperation. "The Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex has an incredible array of resources and can be one of the most competitive regions of the, country for economic development, state and federal funding and private investment capital," according to North Texas Com- mission Chairman Robert L. Herchert. "The biggest threat to our success is internal divisiveness and a lack of regional cohesiveness. We must always ri:member we are allies and not enemies, even if at times we are competing for the same prize. Some :ompetition within the region is inevitable and can even be healthy if it results in a stronger prodtct with which to compete with other regions," says Herchem "Better for a company or asset to be insid,, the Metroplex rather outside the area. The danger is that intra-Metroplex competitions can dete• ri.Jrate into rock throwing contests and, in the process, do irrevocable damage to the image and potential of the entire region. Like it or not, we ase all in the same boat, and even though we may compete among ourselves for oars, in the end, the only v, ay we can move ahead is together." -more- L. J Y e ♦ i~j , Regional Unity lgendaNo. lJ o1 June 28, 1994 Ageadaltem S add 1-1-1 iJete 7,1ij .9 'Today, in an increasingly interrelated and global economy, there is an even stronger need for the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex to work together to solve regional problems and better compete with the other regions of the nation and world. Unity is the key to the prosperity of the Metroplex, / continued Herchert, "and increased communication is the key to unity." Regional Unity has been a goat of the North Texas Commission since its inception in 1971. The NTC li is a regional economic development group supported by more than 400 cities, chambers of commerce, universities and businesses in the Dallas/Fort Worth Mctroplex. Its mission is to promote the economy and enhance the quality of life of the Notch Texas region. Although regional unity is a common thread running through all NTC programs, the Board of Directors this year decided to add an intensified focus to this portion of the mission by passing the resolution and creating a special "Regional Unity" program in the NTC work plan to better address the current complexities and emerging challenges in North Texas. NTC programs focus on such key areas as transportation, international trade, regional markedng, clean air, quality work force planning and small business development. The NTC Regional Unity Program is guided by a diverse 30-member Advisory Committee headed by co-chairmen Dr. Alfred F. Hurley, chancellor of the University of North Texas & UNT Health Science Center in Fort Worth, and 1. Peter Kline, president of the Harvey Hotel Company, both of whom serve on the NTC Board of Directors. Plans and events already identified by the committee for action this year include the following: 1) Conduct an opinion survey of Metroplex leaders to determine priority issues, problems and opportunities which should be addressed by regional collaboration. 2) Develop a plan using the results of the survey for other regioml unity activi;ies including perhaps a speakers bureau, leadership development, inter-city visits, leader retreats, alliances and task forces. 3) Conduct a one-day program for current "graduates" of area leadership development programs in order to provide information on regional citizenship, build a regional constituency, and ex- .,Wre- J'9 ' I i QMND Regional Unity ;gendall 62 199 3 June 28, - add 2-.22. . 2 we 7. add *Zwlf plore opportunities and challenges for Tgiortal collaboration. 4) Conduct a seri.s of four Regional Leader Forums cosponsored by NTC and four area univer• sides. The underlying theme of the forums is Oppori ^ities and Challenges for RegionaI Pros- perity. Leaders from the divergent segments of the Metroplex will focus on issues of regional, significance at these events in order to stimulate unified efforts to explore emerging opportuni- ties. The first forum was held May 24 at the M.J. Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian I University on the topic of defense industry transition. Additional Reg+onal Leader Forums will include programs at the University of North Texas on education, the University of Texas South- western Medical Center at Dallas on health care and at the University of Texas at Arlington on transportation and environment. "All of us in the Metroplex share more than the same geographical setting," says Regional Unity Co- chairman Hurley. "We use the same highway system, breathe the same air, drink the same water, attend 1 many of the same schools and make up the same work Ecce. Our physical infrastructure, environment and chances for economic prosperity do not stop at city or county lines. Parochial approaches to issues which mscan i arbitrary bocndaries waste scarce resources. They also don't workl " One example of recent regional cooperation that has netted good results is the North Texas Clean Air Coalition which was formed in March 1993. This group, made up of the North Texas Commission, the Greater Dallas and Fort Worth Chambers of Commerce and the North Central Texas Council of Govern- ments, has trade great progress in creating awareness of the ozone crisis which faces the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. The coalition was formed with the recognit°on that the Metroplex is one air shed. If attainment of the Clean Air Act is not reached by 1996 the sanctions that will be imposed by the EPA will affect the entire 12-county region. -more- I Y x I Regional Unity June 28, 1994 ien0aiVU add 3-3.3 ]l'r02 fe SCI ~J /e!~ According to Regional Unity Cochairman Kline, "DFW Intemarional Airport is a perfect living ex- ample of what regional unity and cooperation can mean. Together as a region we built what is now the linchpin of our whole economy. It demonstrates very clearly the need to plan and work together for the good of the entire North Texas area. Transportation, intemational trade and obtaining limited govern- ment funding are three prime areas where cooperation is essential in the next decade." The regional phenomenon of intricately interconnected center cities and suburbs such as tale Metroplex has evolved as a result of faster and morn, advancer: communications and transportation, diminishing trade barriers and the region's su rior shill ,ti tyto innovate and respond to change. The region has become the focus of competition in the increasingly competitive global economy. Inter-regional compe- i d6on is intense for limited state and federal funding, for highly mobile investrwmt capital, and for economic growth and development. Winning these inter-regional competitions is important to achieving regional prosperity which, in turn, directly impacts the quality of life within a region. "Regions which pull together rather than pull apart on intergovernmental and public-private issues will fare better in the incense inter-regional competitions witch the economic arena," says Herchert. "The bottom line is this: winning these competitions contributes to a region's economic prosperity and quality of life. Losing them leads to economic stagnation and a decline in the quality of life." -30- t t, ATTACHMENT D-1 N TC* H1* stor NORTH TFiXAS COMMISSION Twenty-three years ago there were only a airport in the world (based on either total aircraft handful of corporate headquarters in North Texas operations or total passengers), with more titan and DFW Airport had not yet seen Its first flight. 2,100 !lights daily to 276 cities world-wide. In fact, in those days this sprawling assortment of The North Texas Commission has worked communities was not even known as the Metro- throughout the years to promote the Metroplex to plea. On July 29, 1971, a group of civic leaders an international audience. To that end, NTC was from across North Texas joined together to form instrumental in the location of a United States the North Texas Commission, an agreement which Customs District Headquarters and the creation of would change the course of history In our region. a Foreign Trade Zone In North Texas. The With DFW Airport under construction, it was commission's work in promoting the economy of agreed that a regionally-unifying force was neces- North Texas also continues to play a vital role in sary if North Texas was ever to take its place making the Metroplex a viable destination for among the nationally and internationally promi- international air routes. nent regions of the world. Founders of the North The commission has been a strong advocate of Texas Commisslon (NTC) shared what was then a the expansion of DFAV Airport, working from unique vision of a regional marketing organization within the community to gamer support for the for the entire Notch Texas area. C.A. Tatum, Jr., project. the fast volunteer leader of NTC, often remarked, NTC was largely responsible for coordinating "Our strength is the spirit and unity of the people the State of Texas' proposal to the U.S. Depart- of our region." ment of Energy to locato the Superconducting The North Texas Commission was chartered as Super Collider (SSQ in North Texas. Because a non-profit, membership-supported organization Congressional funding has been cancellea, NTC is which would work to unify the North Texas region working with State and Federal agencies to maxi- to maximize the visibility of the area as an vicel- mize use of the remaining resources. lent place in which to live and do business. It is ; NTC markets the Metroplex by promoting its now supported by about 400 cities, chambers, assets and important industries such as high tech- universities and businesses. In February cf 1972, nology, telecommunications and transporta,•ion, 1 NTC copyrighted the term "Southwest Metro- warehousing and distribution. plex," which users later shortened to simply Other key projects include international trade. "Metroplex; in order to establish the Identity of regional clean air issues and transportation devel- the allied communities of North Texas, opment. NTC also provides support for the North One of NTC's first objectives was to secure air Central Texas InterLink, Inc. and the Dallas/Fort routes for DFW Airport. By 1977, DFW had Worth Regional Film Commission. inaugurated its first trans-Atlantic route, daily non- Throughout its history, NTC has worked to stop service from DFW to London. In those early address regional issues while focusing on opportu- years NTC laid the groundwork that enabled DFW nities to unify the North Texas region. to reach its current status as the second busiest lgendailem 5 I t ATTACHMENT D-2 NTCjp A PROFILE NORTH TEXAS CONIMiSS10N What is the North How does NTC Why should I join the Texas Commission?_ accomplish its goals? Commission? North Texas has a diverse The North Texas Commis- Comntission memberships uny of communides with a vast sion is guided by a volunteer provide the funds to carry out array of resources. Although the board of directors headed by the 1994 programs that have many individual cities which Chairman of the Board Robert been identified and approved by make up North Texas are all L. Here hen and operated on a our board of directors. The very differen4 one thing they day-today basis by a profes- success of the North Texas share is the vision for a rich sional staff headed by President Commission programs helps quality of life and a prosperous Dean H. Vanderbilt. ensure an improving standard of i and growing ea homy. The North Texas Commis- living and quality of life for the The key to achieving this ston philosophy, "cooperate to four million citizens of the vision is regional cooperation compete," is one that has paid D/FW Metroplex including yr.,, and action. That is the ongoing major dividends to this region and your company. i mission of the North Texas in the form of hundreds of Involvement in North Texas Commission (NTC) which was corporate expansions and Commission programs provides founded in 1971 to help market relocations. members an oppo-tunity to Pind develop the DFW Interna- NTC relies on its members' partirlpate in the development clonal Airport and the Metroplex. voluntary participation on of regional strategies while NTC is a non-profu, city, committees and task forces to meeting and interacting with chamber and private sector keep its overhead low and other NTC members. membership-supported organiza- receive important input from the Members are also invited to don which seeks to combine the business community. attend NTC functions including vast resources of the Nona Programs for 1994 include, the annual membership lun- Texas region to maximize the ! Transportation cheon and Metroplex Forums visibility of the Metroplex and ■ Regional Marketing featuring internationally known raise the level of awareness of ■ Regional Unity speakers, membersh',p recep- the area nadonally and intema- ■ Clean Air tions and briefings by experts tionally as an excellent place to i Mentor Program on timely business issues. live and do business. Within that ■ North Cc,, sal Texas North Texas Commission framework, the commission will lnterLink membership also demonstrates develop data, facilitate regional ! Dalla&T-ort Worth Regional to the rest of the Metroplex that interaction and unity on signifi- film Commission your company is a responsible cant regional issues and Li the and concerned member of the catalyst for programs which can broader regional community. best be carried out on a regional Individually, we In North basis. Texas have much to offer, but when we pool our resources and cooperate, we are unbeatable. QM__ No la=o ed~ ATTACHMENT D-3 I TC* 1994 BOARD OF DIRECTORS NORTH T'F.XAS C011,~11SSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Chairman of the Board Director of large (Fort Worth) Dkecior at large Robert L. Herchert Denny Alexander J. J. O'Nelll President & CEO Chairman of the Board Chk/Executive Officer Freest and Nichols, Inc. Fort Worth ChamAsr of Commerce Sky Ch,-fs, Inc. Secrelmy Director at Large (Subarban Cities) Director at Large Erma C. Johnson Alfred F. Hurley D.Lynn Spruill Vice' Chancellor, Admidiiralson Chancellor Aviation Pilot cram County Junior College University of North Texas and UNT Delta Air Ltnes, Inc. District Health Science Center at Fort Worth GenerolCouhsel Treasurer Director at large (Mid Cities) Hal T. Thorn,- C. H. Moore Reece A. Overcash,Jr, Partner Managing Partner Chairman A CEO Thorne & Thorne KPMG Peat Marwick Associates Corporation of North Morita Immediate Past Chairman Director of Large (Dollar) Robert 8. Lane John L: Adams Directoratlarge Preside,u Chair»mtt'of [he Board Cipriano R. Mudoz NadomBank-Texas Greater Dallas Chamber President & CEO of Commerce MuAor Printing Company, Inc, } Elaine B. Agather ++David Braden •*David Doyle Chairman of the Board & CEO Chairman President Texas Commerce Bank DFW Internatlonal Airport Board North Central Texas Council of Governments Joseph Aicantsr John R. Castle, Jr. President Senior Vice President Gale Duff-Bloom Alman Electric, Inc, Electronic Data Systems Corporation Executive Vice President & Director, Administration Tom Allen John T. Chain, Jr. J.C. Penney Company, lne. Partner Executive Vice President Maguire/Thomas Partners Burlington Northern Railroad Hector Pscamlila, Jr. Chairman of the Board John C. Appel Winfred T. Colbert Greater Dallas Hispanic Chamber Stale President, TexasiNew Mexico Attorney of Commerce State Operations Colbert & Associates GTE Telephone Operations + Jack W, Evans Richard L. Connor Vice Chairman f Steve Bartlett President & Publisher Tom Thumb Food & Drugs, Inc. I Mayor Fort Worth Star Telegram City of Dallas V"No Date q k 7a>a r Y , S t 1 Joe R. Ewen A. K. Mago Bob Smith Councaman Chairman of the Board Mayor Ci v gArlington Dallas Arian American Chamber of City of Garland Commerce Valerie Freeman Ronald L. Smith, FACHE President Michael J. McCarthy President & CEO Imprimis Group, inc. Senior Vice President, Secretary !lams Methodist Health System & General Counsel •Bayard If. Friedman A. H. Belo Corporation AnnetleStrauss President Former Mayor Bayard H. Friedman, inc. Liz Minyard City of Dallas Co-Chairman of du Board Kay Granger Minyard Food Stores, In c. J. Michael Talbert Mayer City of Fort Worth James N. Muns Lunt one Star President & Gas COO Co s Company L Sempany Donna Gray City of Plano Wes M. Taylor Chairman of the Board Execu dye Vice President Richardson Chamber of Commerce Charles R. O'Neal TV Electric Past President Carl L. Harris Dallas Black Chamber of Commerce Director, Public Nfatrs Ted Tedesco Bell Helkoprer Textron Inc. Joe V. Pace Vice i, Corporate ~ljatrr President American can Air Airlines,lnc. Doeglas D. Hawthorne AC. Pace & Company Gary Terry President & CEO Past Chairman of the Board Presbyterlan Healthcare System Ronald L. Parrish Vice President Corporate ofCo merce-BeQ(~rdChamber E John J. Hernandez Development of Commerce PiwChalrntanoftheBoard Tandy Corporation •+TomVandergrilf Fort Worth Hispanic Chamber of Judie Commerce Edward A. Peterson shareholder Tarrant County j ••Lee F. Jackson P. instead Sechresr & MWck J. William Wenrkh Judie Chancellor Dallas County Paul R. Ray, Jr. Dallas County Community Coheir President & CEO District Devoyd Jennings Paul R. Ray & Company, Inc. Past Chairman of the Board if. Ron White Fort Worth Metropolitan Black J. Thomas Schlefrer hite, it Partner Chamber of Commerce President WMamgIng Toms Rangers Baseball Club Whitt, !fill, Stns, & Wiggins, LLP J. Peter Kline desictor President Kimberly J. Simpson desfii nals nate~roectorEx ri-0ves Harvey Hotel Company President & CEO sDittlor EKfficio SbVson & Associates, Inc, •E L. Langley Chairman of the Board d CEO Vwln L, Skiles, Jr. Universal Service Telephone Corp, Vice Presidua Texas Instruments Incorporated Li I } i. h t .5N Now- T- ~ t~ t ATTACHMENT D-4 1 NT(i Accomplishments 10/93-3/94 NORTH TEXAS CONINUSSION i The North Texas Commission, Fort Worth co-signed letters to Senators together with city, business, univer- Hutchison and Gramm urging their support for sity and chamber members, works Congressional funding for RAILTRAN in fall of to develop and promote the 1993. economy and well-being of the Members of the NTC RAILTRAN Task Force Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex according to the presented the NTC resolution on RAILTRAN to NTC Program of Work. NTC also provides the city councils of Dallas and Fort Worth and the support for North Central Texas InterLink, Inc, boards of DART and The T. All four entities and the Dallas,/Fort Worth Regional Film Com- passed the necessary Interlocal agreements unani- mission, which are located at the NTC offices. mously. The following summarizes the NTC's Fiscal Year DART is awarding a contract for the refur- 1994 accomplishments from October 1, 1993 bishment of their newly acquired railcars. Phase y through March 31, 1994: 1, which will offer passenger service from down- town Dallas to Irving, is scheduled to be in opera- TRANSPORTATION lion by November 1995. Design for Phase I is 90 percent complete. ■ DFW Airport 20th anniversary celebrated In April, representatives from Dallas and Fort On January 13, NTC, the Greater Dallas Worth plan to testify on Phase II fur Jing before Chamber of Commerce and the Fort Worth the House Transportation Sub-committee of the Chamber of Commerce hosted a VIP reception Appropriations Committee. Phase II will be prior to the DFW Airport Board's J. Erik Jonsson passenger service from downtown Fort Worth to Aviation Award Luncheon as part of the Dallas/ Irving with connections to DFW Airport. The T i Fort Worth International Airport 20th anniversary will award preliminary design contracts for Phase . I I in April. In support of the anniversary. NTC displayed a joint ad with the DFW Airport at the reception North Texas Regional Transportation promoting the airport's "We've Got A Great Task Force Future Together" regional campaign and in March The NTC Board authorized establishment of them mailed to the d to corporate members encouraging the North Texas Regional Transportation Task produce similar ads. Force to develop business support for transporta- ■ Vernetl Sturns honored at reception tion. The task force will inform the regional business community of the critical needs and On February 4, NTC and eight local chambers importance of the Setroplex surface transporta- o!commerce sponsored a farewell reception to lion system. In addition, the task force will work honor Yarnell Sturns, executive director of the to provide strong, unified private-sector support DFW International Airport. for the programs, projects and funding require- 0 RAILTRAN progresses merits of the region's Mobility 2010 Plan, NTC RAILTRAN Task Force Co-chairmen Ed Peterson ircm Dallas and Joe K. Pace from Apeodait 00 L Date 18e~3 I. f ^ SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER potential for the Metroplex over the next 10 years. The report was prepared by the LBJ ■ SSC funding support School of Public Affairs and the Institute of ♦ SSC s..pport efforts assisted Latin American Studies at the University of NTC worked closely with the Superconduct- Texas at Austin. ing Super Collider Laboratory and the Texas V NTC, DFW Airport representatives National Research Laboratory Commission in visited Chile coordinating and distributing SSC information NTC and DFW Airport representatives tray and through direct support of the project. eled to Santiago, Chile, March 20.27, to join Although a House-Senate conference voted to efforts in exploring business opportunities at end Congressional funding of the SSC on Chile's annual air show, FIDAE'94. the October 21, 1993, NTC continues to assist In largest international aerospace trade fair in maximizing the use of the SSC facilities and South America. resources that remain. Briefings on the use of Attending were NTC President Dean the SSC site will take place in Dallas and Fort Vanderbilt; Hdber Garcia Migliore, an NTC Worth in May, consultant who works in International opera- ♦ NTC recognlud for support efforts Lions for Freese and Nichols, Inc.; Terry NTC was among area organizations rccog- Parent, deputy executive director of the DFW nized at an appreciation luncheon hosted on International Airport Board; and Mario October 20 by board members of the Commit- Trevino, director of minority and economic tee for Construction of the SSC and the Foun- affairs for DFW International Airport Board, dation for American Scientific Leadership and Trip participants attended the air show as the commissioners of the Texas National guests of Bell Helicopter and provided infor- Research Laboratory Commission. TNRLC mation to exhibitors about the Metroplex as r. Chairman Charles Perry thanked guests for "world class aviation center." The Norrh contributing their time in national support Texas: World Center of Aviation Business efforts to maintain Congressional funding for Directory was distributed along with other the Super Collider. informative materials in Spanish and English. NTC and DFW Airport representatives REGIONAL MARKETING ' also promoted direct passenger and cargo air service between Santiago and DFW and began building stronger relationships with Chilean ■ Internatlonst Marketing leaders by encouraging visits by both business ♦ South American leaders invited to DIFW and government leaders to the Dallas/Fort As part of NTC's South American emphasis Worth area. this year, several CEOs of major Metroplex ♦ NAFTA businesses have agreed to host CEOs from NTC prepared a five-page summary of the firms in Argentina, Brazil and Chile during NAFTA and its benefits to North Texas. visits to the Metroplex. Copies of The North American Free Trade ♦ Trade with ABC eounirles studied Agreement: A Unique Oppornrnky for North A study entitled Trade Linkages between the Texas are available, Dallas/Fort I"orth Metroplex and Argentina, ♦ Gateway to Mexico Brazil and Chile was commissioned by NTC The North Texas Commission developed a and Indicated that there is a $1.57 billion trade fact sheet to market the D/FW Metroplex as .tf j. 5 the "Gateway to Mexico." The fact sheet is World Center of Aviation Business Directory available in English and Spanish. A similar at the luncheon and at the National Airlift "Gateway to the World" fact sheet is also Convention held at the DFW Hyatt October available. 27.29. ♦ D/FW Information prepared In Spanish ♦ Transportation, warehousing Informative materials on the D/FW Metroplex and distribution have been prepared in Spanish. The docu- A group of University of Texas at Arlington ments include a list of major corporations in graduate students prepared a preliminary the region, a list of the top ten largest area review of the transportation, warehousing and cities, a list of fortune 500 companies in the distribution industries in the Metroplex outlin- Metroplex, a fact sheet on why D/FW is the ing the strengths and weaknesses of the area. strategic center of North America and a NTC commissioned a consultant in April supplement page to the North Texas: World to further study and survey the Metroplex Center of Avlarion Business Directory. The transportation, warehousing and distribution Spanish materials were distributed on a recent assets and areas requiring improvement. The j trip to South America. ! findings will be used to develop a plan to T Survey on Services for Foreign Visitors promote the Metroplex as a transportation, The Norm Texas Commission, in cooperation warehousing and distribution center, with the Dallas/Fort Worth Tourism Council, conducted a survey in February of local hotels REGIONAL UNITY and attractions to identify existing services available to guests visiting the Metroplex from a foreign country. Information was also ■ Regional Unity Advisory Committee forms gathered about the deficiencies in this area, NTC formed a Regional Unity Advisory especially as they relate to the upcoming Committee to oversee and promote NTCs Re- World Cup games. Survey result highlights gional Unity program this year, Alfred Hurley, were contributrA to the Dallas Convention and chancellor of the University of North Texas and Visitors Bureau to use in World Cup publica- the UNT Health Science Center in Fort Worth, i tions. Additional steps to improve the ser. and Peter Kline, president of Harvey Hotel Com- vices available to foreign visitors are being pany, are co-chairmen of the committee. The considered for the future. Also, a briefing for purpose of the program is to create positive I taxi drivers at DFW Airport and Love Field to working relationships among leaders of the region inform them about the events surrounding the in order to facilitate more cooperation and col- World Cup will take place in June. laboration, and as a result, North Texas will better ♦ Dallas World Salute luncheon hosted compete with the regions across the country and On October 11, NTC and the Dallis World the world. Salute to Japan hosted a luncheon and seminar to present East Meets West. How Business ■ Events held to discuss regional Issues Decisions are Made in Japan and the U.S. NTC held forums, activities and roundtablts ■ Targeted Industry Marketing for North Texas communities, businesses, cham- ♦ D/FW promoted as an aviation center bers of commerce and other economic develop- NTC and the North Dallas Chamber of ment organizations to discuss regional issues. Commerce hosted an aviation luncheon on The events included: October 6. NTC distributed the North Texas: l I ~rRntl I I 41 two /04~ 1 1 t; n ~ i 1 ~ } i ♦ Metroplex arts leaders meet the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, Lone Leaders from area arts groups met on March Star Gas and TU Electric. 29 at the North Texas Commission to discuss ♦ Communities Roundtable hosted an update of the Economic impact Study of the The North Texas Commission hosted a North Arts In the Metroplex and possible unified Texas Communities Roundtable on December efforts for area arts groups. Attending the 7 at the DFW Airport Marriott Hotel. Sixty meeting were representatives from the Arling. community leaders and representatives at. ton Arts Council, the Arts Council of Fort tended the roundtable which included the Worth and Tarrant County, the Dallas Busi• premiere of "Your Futura is in the Air," a ness Committee for the Arts, the Dallas video produced by the North Central Texas Coalition for the Arts, the Greater Denton Arts Council of Governments to encourage corpo- Council, the Irving Arts Cutter, 04; Northeast rata participation in clean air compliance Tarrant County Arts Council, ine Office of activities. Wtural Affairs from the City of Dallas and Tarrant County Commissioner Mani Van the North Texas Commission. Ravenswaay gave an update on "clean air," ♦ Sister Cities discussed at roundtabl: with Michael Morris of the North Central On February 15 at the Omni Mandalay Hote! Texas Council of Governments providing in Las Colinas, NTC hosted a North Texas comments on the video. Terry Parent, deputy Communities Roundtable which focused on executive director of marketing and govern. Sister City relationships. Panelists included mental relations for DFW Airport, presented a Mary Palko, state coordinator of Sister Cities transportation update. Additionally, Willard International; Bob Bolen, former mayor of R. Whitbred, P.E., project manager, commuter Fort Worth; Richard Fisher, managing partner rail for DART, provided details on the of Fisher Capital Management; and Sally RAILTRAN project. f Campbell, vice president communications at ♦ Regional Unity Planning Workshop held NTC. Palko presented an overview of the The North Texas Commission held a Regional sister cities program and Bolen explained the Unity Planning Workshop on November 30 at economic opportunities available through the Marriott Solana Hotel. Dr. Alfred F. sister city relationships. Fisher and Campbell Hurley, chancellor of the University of North covered details on potential economic oppor- Texas, moderated the workshop which was tunnies In South America with an emphasis on at~ended by twenty participants from across the tour rtes of Argentina, Brazil and Chile, the region. ♦ Area leaders gather at rodeo The North Texas Commission hosted several CLEAIrI AIR community and business leaders and their spouses at the Southwestern Exposition and N'TCAC alerts "Your Future is to the Air" Livestock Show in Fort Worth on January 27. Guests met for dinner at the Backstage Club The North Texas Clean Air Coalition, formed and attended the g p.m. rodeo in the Will in 1993 by NTC, the Fort Worth Chamber of Rogers Coliseum for an opportunity to be- Commerce, the Greater Dallas Chamber of come better acquainted. Members of the NTC Commerce and the North Central Texas Boa,id and staff hosted guests in rodeo box ! Council of Governments, leads volunteer seats donated for the evening by Bank One, efforts to bring North Texas into compliance with Federal Clean Air Act regulations. Be- 1 r I G I cause there were 18 ozone alerts with four MENTOR PROGRAM days of ex.eedances in 1993, the coalition continues to educate the public that "Your ■ Mentor-Entrepreneur pilot year underway Future is in the Air." The coalition has The Mentor-Entrepreneur Program is a new projects underway for the upcoming ozone program designed to improve the economy of the season which begins May 1 and can be ex- Metroplex by developing the capabilities of small, pected to last until October. emerging businesses through a mentor relation- s ♦ Cleo n air executive committee selected ship with a larger or more experienced business. The NfCAC selected Isaac Manning of Alli- For 1994, the program has 25 mentors which are ance Development as chairman and Sally NTC member companies and 42 entrepreneurs Campbell of the North Texas Commission as which are member companies of the Dallas/Fort vice chairman. Worth Minority Business Development Council. { Others named to the executive committee ♦ participants matched, recognized j are Donna Parker, Fort Worth Chamber, Reid After being matched by members of the Rector, Greater Dallas Chamber, Paul program's monitoring task force, representa- Wageman, Winstead Sechrest & Minick, P.C.; tives from mentor companies met with entre- 1. Michael Talbert, Lone Star Gas; Lynn preneur company representatives in January to Hayes, North Central Texas Council of Gov- finalize details on a mentor-entrepreneur ernments; Marti Van Ravenswaay, Tarrant relationship. County Commissioner, Win Colbert, Haynes On February 23 at the 1NFOMART, E & Boone, L.L.P.; Catherine Simpson and members of the board of directors from the Mazy Palko, The T, and Tony Mendoza and North Texas Commission and the D/FVY Cathy Ingle, DART. Minority Business Development Council ♦ VAunteers join clean air committees hosted a wine -and-ch:ese reception to recog- Nearly 100 volunteer members of committees nize representatives from the mentor and i and sub-committees have been working on the entrepreneur companies and to kick off the 1994 NTCAC plan of action. Committees NTC Mentor Program's pilot year. include Ozone Alert Program, NTCAC Speak- ers Bureau, Media, Publications and Materials, NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INTERLINK Education, Governmental Participation, Cor- porate Participation, Transportation, Bicycle ■ NTC provided ongoing administrative and staff Transportation and the Clean Cities Program support for InterLlnk, a regional quality work i (alternative fuel vehicles). force planning organization, ♦ PSA features Fort Worth, Dallas Mayors 1 An Ozone Alen public service announcement On October 7, twenty three of InterLlnk's board ii (PSA) produced by UTA professes Bob Cook and committee member, including task force and .d: staff features Fort Worth Mayor Kay chairmen, gathered for a day to propose a strategic { Grange; and Dallas Mayor Steve Bartlett plan for the upcoming year. offering alternative modes of tranportation on ozone alert days. The PSA will run on televi- N On October 20, the InrerLlnk Board completed sion beginning this spring. and unaninr,usly approved the organization's strategic plan in the form of a service delivery plan. i alai / s ~ Ale r I r 4 . 1 ■ Quality work force phn presented member Kim Simpson of Simpson & Gaule, Inc. T In November, lnterLink participated with are serving on the film commission board of the Texas Education Agency in presenting to directors. It is estimated that film, television and regional educators the master plan for voca- commercial projects bring in at least $130 million tional and technical education. The master each year to the North Texas economy. plan identifies the role of quality work force planning with community college districts' and ■ D/F %V represented at Location Exposition independent school districts' vocational/ Executive Director Roger Burke and Production technical programs. Coordinator Lisa Campbell of the D/FW Regional T lnterLink participated in the Texas F.duca- Film Commission attended the annual Location don Agency's Raising Expectations for Stu- Expo held in Los Angeles February 25-27. The dents to Meet Real World Needs program by film commission received leads on more than 60 providing input, from I nterLink's Management projects including feature films, television, music Task Force, on the skills needed for students videos, commercials and documentaries. The to be leaders. two-member staff and part-time intents have begun reviewing scripts, scouting locations and ■ A representative from lnterLink participated as distributing location photographs as well as a panel member in a teleconference which was a information on why Dallas/Fort Worth is the best tech-prep town hall meeting for parents in Tarrant place to film a project. Four projects are sched- County. uled for this summer with many more pending. 3 ■ Members of InterLink's Aviation Task Force ■ Television, feature films shot In D/FW area made presentations on aviation careers to students V Walker, Texas Ranger continues throughout the region. Walker, Texas Ranger, the ,,,ries starring Chuck Norris, is still underway. The film ■ lnterLink published and distributed to area commission continues to assist the producdon educators brochures on Key Industries and Tar- on a weekly basis. The series will film ~J geted Occupations for 1994-2000. through April 20 and then break until August. T Music video, documentary shot locally 0 Fall and spring newsletters were completed. Propaganda Films was in Dallas for a week shooting pop music artist Meadoafs latest ■ InterLink's Service Delivery Plan, the work music video Objects in the Rearview Mirror. program for 1994.1996, was approved by the The video was shot in Denton, Argyle, Valley State. View and Krum. MTV was in Dallas shooting a couple of segments on the local ruck band DALLASIFORT WORTH REGIONAL Pantera. They shot at the Starplex, the Base- 1 FILM COMMISSION ment and in Deep Ellum. T Big plans, big names featured In January Curse of the Starving Class, a feature film ■ NTC provided ongoing administrative and staff starring Kathy Bates, James Woods, Lou support and contributed resources to assist the Gosset Jr. and Henry Thomas, shot in Dallas Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Film Commission and Waxahachie for five weeks of filming which works to maximize the economic impact of beginning on January 17. the television and film industry in North Texas. NTC President Dean Vanderbilt and NTC board i r 1 V Montel Williams Show visited Dallas V North Texas Commission Fast f sets Out of My Way Productions in New York About North Texas brought the syndicated Monrel Williams Show V Board Briefing to Dallas with a total of six shows taped on V Trade Linkages between the Dallas/Fort November 10 and l1 at the Majestic Theatre, Worth Metroplex and Argentina, Brazil V Island City two-hour pilol completed and Chile On November 4, Lorimar Television, which V Gateway to Mexico fact sheet shot Dallas partially on location In the area for V La Entrada a Mexico fact sheet more than a decade, completed three weeks of V Las Dlez Cludades Alds Gra,ndes del filming on a two-hour pilot of Island City, a Metroplex de Dallas/Fort Worth, list of series set in a futuristic, environmentally. D/FW top ten largest cities I convolled city in the year 2075. V Norte de Texas: Centro Mundial de t V Feature films made to the Metro lex November and December were busy months ment page tor Avlation BusinesslDirectory for local filmmakers. Three groups wrapped ♦ En el drea de Dallas/Fort Worth se t production on feature length films in Decem- encttenta la tercera concentration mds bar. The names of the films are Only in grande de compaillas Fortune 500. DIFW E America, a spoof on Robert Tilton, produced cuenta con la sede central de 29 de estas I by Conspiracy Films; Striking Point, an actic;t compairfas, list of Fortune 500 companies film from Greymarket Entertainment; and The in the region Dark Dealer, a horror film by Aries Produc- V Corporaclones lmportartes en el Metroplex dons. These films were all scheduled to have de Dallas/Fort Worth, list of major a straight-to-video release, corporations in the region V Metroplex de Dallas/Fort Worth: Centro INFORMATION RESOURCES Estrategico de Norreamerica, fact sheet on - - why Dallas,/Fort Worth Metroplex is the ■ North Texas Regional lnformalion System strategic center of North America (NTRIS) I The North Texas Regional Information System is MEMBERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES a computer-accessed link to regional economic i indicators offered by the North Texas Commission ■ Committees and Tnsk Forces in cooperation with the North Central Texas NTC encourages member involvement in pro. Council of 0overnments. NTC in: mbers are grams through various committees including; entitled to access the NTRIS at no cost. All that is V Aviation Marketing Committee needed to access the system is a personal corn. V NTCAC Clean Air Committees puler and a modem. NTC provides an identifca- V Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Film tion number and a user manual. For personalized Commission Board anrt Committees data service, members mn•p call NTC directly. V Finance Committee ■ Publications V lnterLink Committees and Task Forces V 1994 North Texas Commission V International Marketing Committee Membership Directory V Mentor Program Task Forces V North Texas Regional Transportation V Windowon the Metroplex, bi-monthly 1',n5k Force newsletter DMaI,9, y a tads i y ♦ North Texas Regional Information System Committee ♦ RAILTRAN Task Force ♦ Regional Unity Advisory Committee i A Events ♦ NTC held periodic events to keep members informod of NTC projects and to explore timely business issues including: Avlarlrn Luncheon - Octobers 1993 East Meets West: How Business Decisions are made In Japan r,-d the U.S. -Octcber, 1993 Regional Unity Planning Workshop i -November, 1993 Communities Roundtable -December, 1993 Regional Leaders Meet at Rodeo -Jaauary,1994 Reception to Honor DFW Inrernational Airport 20th Anniversary Celebration -January, 1994 The Economic Development Opportunities and Benefits of Sister City RelVionships -February, 1994 The Technology-Based Economic Recovesj of the 90s - March, 1994 s For more information on any of the programs, publicatlons or committees and sersk forces, I please contact the North Texas Commission at l metro (214) 421.0400. _ -W-O e r5ti I ~ a 1 Sri ; 'i r ' r r ATTACHMENT D-5 I V E NORTH TE}tASCOMMISSION less Board of Cl rectors 'AUG 2 139'- Curare 'Rot»n B. Lane MUNICIPAL SERVICES ,Eric ohnaa August 23, 1993 £(',ONOMIC•DEVELOPMENT Socrstary 1 'C. H. Moore JQendaNo qu, Tressunr 'Hal T. Thorns e9tlalt General Counsel Ms. Betty McKean 4 Directors Executive Director Date ~n L~.~.nd Municipal Setvices(Economic Development G Elalna B. Ag:ihar City of Denton Lester M. AlbMhal Jr 215 East McKinney •R. Denny Alexander Denton, Texas 76201 j Jerry W, Mold Tan Allen 1 Dennis Bailey Steve Barth John T. Chain, Jr. wnrraT.cool The North Texas Regional Information System was established to provide immediate Jacck W W. . Frans Eastman 'Jack access to information about the North Texas economy. Over 100 files have been Joe FL Ewen established and over 150 orsanizations are on-line. As a North Texas Commission Kay Grarri member, the service is available to the City of Denton at no charge and can be Douglas 0. )-lawtnoms 'RobenL.Herchen accessed via personal computer and modem. John j, Herntndet Michael Ho"all The NTR1S contains information on the following categories: •Adra EHunq Population - Superconducting Super DevnrJackson • Employment and Wages Collider Jorl Corti JoMwn - Industrial Growth - Business Costs and Taxes RkM dKKn'ail Jr - Utilities and Living Costs M.L K*O Telecommunications • Education and Training A. K.Mago - Transportation and • Quality of Life Mchast J. McCarthy Liz Moywd Market Access • Comparative Evaluation; 'C~ N 14;Mu Munoz - International Trade and • Regional Demographics James J.ONeia Investment • North Texas Commission riesceA.Overcesh.Jr. - Real Estate Membership Ja K. Pace Ronald L. Psmsh - Retail Trade • Economic Dcvelopment Contacts H. Ross Ps"A. Jr. as well as are a-s pcc i tic Cc n s u s dat a, Su pe rcondu cti n g Su pe r Col l i de r con tract aw a rds, Edward Poler Ay, it, son Poo 0. R aay, . and Major Melioplex Employers. Poo Malcolm S. Robinson M p4dririiives If your organization has an information manager, economic development program, USA Satumoto i J. Thomas ScN3Ser or marketing department, please forward this letter to them as an invitation to access KlmbenyJ s'mpaon the database as an information resource, The system can be accessed concurrently Elwin L. Saves, Jr. D. Lynn Sdn.e by any number of persons within an organization. Amene sire woo venMA Slums J, McWl TNDerr Enclosed is an index of tiles contained on the North Texas Regional Information we$M.Tartor System. To obtain an Identification number and user's gulde, please contact Anita TomvaMertill Steele at (Metro) 214/621.0400. J Wmtamwenech Directors rr1` lroe Sincerely, of rdedrnatt Bayard E. L Langley President wa44-+~ •A Dean>cvandemn Dean H. Vanderbilt 6exadv7reeernmMee President Melling Address: P.O. Sax 810248 a DFW Airport a Texas 175261 Street Address: 8445 Freeport Parkway a Suite 640 s King a Texas a 75063 Tslsphons: 2141621.0400 (Metro) a SM34.5699 a (Fax) 2141929.0918 1 Y ~gMdtNo 4 ' ~ Agendall Lit/ (lite NORTH TEXAS REGIONAL NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION INFORMATION SYSTEM The North Texas Regional Information System is it computer•accessedlink tocommun[cation and information services In the Dallas/Fort N'osth hittroplelt offered by the North Texas Commission in eooperatior with the North Central Texas council of Governments. The system consists of ix regional ecooomic development Indicator database, electronic mail, and an electronic bulletin board. All members of the North Texas Commission are entitled to access the N17RIS at no cost. All That Is needed to fink up with the system is a personal computer and a modem. For Information on how to obtain an Identification number and a user manual, please call Anita Steele at the North Texas Commission, (Atelro) 214/621.0400. L NORTH TEXAS REGIONAL INFOR\SATION SYSTEM REGIONAL INDICATORS INDEX POPULATION UTILITIES AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dallas/Fort Worth is the Nation's 9th Largest MeluVolitan Area Industrial FJearical Rau Comparison The Metroplex Is One of the Nation's Faaat Growing Regions Commercial Electrical Rue Comparison Population Characteristics; • Age Ract&% Residential Electric Service Bill Comparison Total Population r 1969.1988 Industrial Gas Bill Comparison 199o Census of Population Commercial Gas Bill Comparison 1993 Population Estimates Residential Gas Bill Comparison Population Projections • 19962010 Largest Telceommunicalioru Employers In the Dally Area Dallas Area Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturers EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES Dalla,'Fort Wenh Metroplex Non-Agricultural Employment by TRANSPORTATION AND MARKET ACCESS Industrial Sector 19821992 D!FW International Airport Second Busiest in the World DallasTon Worth Metroplex Non-Agricultural Employment by D/FW International Airport Ranks Second In Passenger Industrial Sector 1993 Eaplanemenu Dallas and Fort Worth/Arlington Employment by Industry, D;'FW International Alrtsort Passenger Service Summary 1987.1997 Ave to It Fli4h I time s 1 Dallas and Fort Worlh/Arlington Employment by Occupation, Non-Stop Flights J 1985.1995 Forecast Areas In Employment Change Texas Employment INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INVESTMENT Dsllaaffort Worth Job Growth • 1982.1992 1991 Foreign-Owned Companies Job Markets • 1991 Dallas Fort Worth Importa'Etports Wage Index Top USA Trading Districts Total Personal Income • 1969-1988 World's Largest Industrial Corporations Per Capita Personal Income • 1969-1988 U.S. Leads the World in Global 500 Corporations Annual Unemployment Rates for the Dally fort Worth Metroplex 1992 Monthly Unemployment Rates for the DalasTort Worth Metroples REAL ESTATE 1993 Monthly Unemployment Rates for the Dallas/Fort Worth Office Spate Vacancies Metroplex Office Space Under Construction industrial Space Vacancies Industrial Construction INDU57RIALGROWTH Ofrce Rental Rues Dallas/Fort Worth Economic Indicator Projections, 19961993 Industrial Rental Rates DallasTort Worth Fortune $00 Firms IndusiriaVOfrice Construction Activity, 1'1814990 Largest Em lovers In the DaIIaaTort Worth Area Demand rot Office Space, 19962000 Ranking of Largest Manufacturing Films in Dallas/Fort Worth by Cities to Watch • 1993 Real Ftate Prospects Employment %I,Ai Oservalued and Undervalued U.S. Real Estate Markets DallasTort Worth and Texas Rank Competitively Among New Housing Characteristics and Expanded industrial Facility Sites Annual Residential Real Estate Activity Metroplex Relocations'Fspansions 1992 Monthly Residemial Real rate Activirr Factors In Choosing Business Locations 1993 Monthly Residential Real Estate Activit>>Existing Home Sala • Dallaa'Port W'onh vs. U.S. New Building Permits Issued. 1987.1992 New Building Permits Issued, 1993 Top Ilomebuilding Markets i J ~ ~oenda~o ` I 03. RETAIL TRADE REGIONAL D£MO3RAPIIIC9'N°*l J Rctad'rrade Gras Sales • 199111992 Population Date -~~---.3 Sales and Use Tax Analysis by Industrial Sector • 199111992 Number of Households Number or Families Age Profik SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER Race SupplieLServices Purchased and Primary Contacts Housing Profik SSC Conlribulion to the North Texas Economy Income Profile SSC itA Procurement Contracts by State Employment Profile SSG'URA Expenditures by Item Education SSC Workforce Market Potential Index BUSINESS COSTS AND TAXES MEMBERSHIP Tax Rates North Texas Commission Membership by Category 1992 Property Tax Rates Freeport Amendment ECONOMIC DEVELOPMaT Workers' Compensation Costs by State Cost Camparisons of corporate Travel Coots Economic Development Resources LRTNG COSTS Cost of Laving Indices Consumer Price Index The Nook Tests Rgtooal Islarteatbtt Systeo 1i coat■los: DallaslFort Worth Consumer Price Index Same and Local Tax Comparison SSC CONS? ACTS AWARDED Homes Sales Prices MostAsast Afrordabk Housing Markets Monthty cost or Living Comparison: Ncw York vs. Piv ease quarter, saingi may be selected by SIC Colt, Da1laaFat Worth „r 'cafe, or dales EDUCATION AND TRAJNiNG 1990 CENSUS DATA Higher Education 199491 SAT Scores by District Population and growth vales are listed by city. county, PMSA and G SAT Scoresby Scale CMSSA. Population and housing chanaerntics may be Kketed by Gra caduscion Rates and Per•Pupif Expenditures city, county, or tip code. QUA'JTY OF LIFE Woe.d's Top Cities h1A10R EMPLOYERS IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS Climat Coombe H A comprehensive rating of tool establishment' employing eao or ousin g ~ Health Care more full-same workers. Employers may be selected by airy or SIC Educational Atlainment Code, Daily Commute Time and Public Transportation Most Popular Attractlons in the Dallas'Fon Wrib Area Spectator Sporu Slate Parks COSIPARATPIT EVALUATIONS Foricne Rankings • The Best Cities for Business Corporate Headquarter Locations TOP Market' fix Office Locations Corporate Relocation Houpots America's HotiestiCeWcst Counties Top Growth Cities • 199) Metropolitan Areas with the Best Potential for Administrative Ofrices Metropolitan Areas with she Best Potential for Manufacturing plants Best U.S. Business Locations Dailas'Fort Worth Economic Growth Projections Ficeed National Average Job Growth In to Most Populous States, June Imfune, 1991 H t ATTACHMENT D-6 NTC* gp~ti~o. ~ N Dad , s. NORTH TEXAS COhfAIISSION 2U.3 ~a NORTH TEXAS COMMISSION CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES (July 14, 1994) r" Town of Addison $ 750 City of Allen 1,360 City of Arlington 17,074 City of Bedford 2,813 City of Carrollton 5,402 City of Cedar Hill 1,358 City of Colleyville 865 City of Dallas 64,766 City of Denton 4,265 City of DeSoto 1,989 City of Duncanville 2,282 City of Farmers Branch 1,551 Town of Flower Mound 1,798 • City of Fort Worth 28,674 City of Frisco 1,000 • x ! City of Gainesville 897 City of Garland- 11,591 City of Grand Prairie 6,418 City of Irving 10,136 City of Keller 954 City of I.Amster 1,415 City of Lewisville 3,076 City of McKinney 1,419 City of Mesquite 6,650 City of North Richland Hills 3,037 City of Plano 8,998 City of Richardson 4,810 City of Richland Hills 1,000 City of Waxahachie 1,172 City of White Settlement 981 City of Wylie _,OQO • Total of 31 Members S199,501 l • First year membe•s paying 1000/6 of dues. E 7. y'4 f. r P i i 'r y i M E M B E R S H I P L I S T I N G aacacnszzasmzaazzaznazasaazsassaszz 07/01/94 Selected status coda(s) (AM ; ATTACHMENT D-7 ID Status a:sass:aaar.a:zsassaamsazssmaa~wascaaasaszaszssaazaamnmsaaaszsa..maz:caaaassszssss 1044 A A.H. Belo Corporation ;Qeoda No 1004 A Town of Addison agertdall 4gen It 1005 A Adolphus Hotel WO .L= bc~, 1505 A Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Fold, L.L.P. ' 1732 A Albertson's (North Texass Division) 1007 A Alcon Laboratories, Inc. 1008 A Alexander & Alexander of Texas, Inc. 1669 A All Saints Health Foundation 1009 M Allen Chamber of Commerce 1010 A City of Allen i 1671 A Alliance Development Company I e 1011 A American Airlines, Inc. i 1014 A American Honda Motor Co. Inc. 1534 M American Indian Chamber of Commerce of Texas 1679 A American Title Company 1019 M Arlington Chamber of Commerce 1020 A City of Arlington 1022 A Associates Corporation of No. America 1727 A AT&T-BNS Sales 1028 A Austin Industries, Inc. 1667 A Auto International Refrigeration 1029 A Automated & Custom Food Services, Inc. 1587 A Aviall, Inc. 1608 M Azle Chamber of Commerce 1536 A Baker & Botts 1622 M Balch Springs Chamber of Commerce 1 1 i i i y r . 6i H E H B E R S H I P L I S T I N G :assaasccssaaxs¢acsasumracsasasama 07/01/94 Selected status code(s) [AM ; A'T'TACHMENT D-7 ID Status aasamaesamaaasaasxsmaaaascsoexeaaetaanaaaaeaamaaameaxsaaxaexcauaaaasaaeamsaasaaza 1044 A A.H. Belo Corpcration 1004 A Town of Addison 'Qen1 110 r Agendalt 1005 A Adolphus Hotel We 0e 00 1505 A Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. 26~ 1732 A Albertson's (North Texass Division) 1007 A Alcon Laboratories, Inc. JJ! 1008 A Alexander & Alexander of Texas, Inc. { 1669 A All Saints Health Foundation 1 1009 H Allen Chamber of Commerce 1010 A City of Allen 1671 A Alliance Development Company 1011 A American Airlines, Inc. 1014 A American Honda Motor Co. Ina. 1534 M American Indian Chamber of Commerce of Texas 1679 A American Title Company 4 1019 M Arlington Chamber of Commerce 1020 A City of Arlington 1022 A Associates Corporation of No. America 1727 A AT&T-BNS Sales 1028 A Austin Industries, Inc. 1667 A Auto International Refrigeration 1029 A Automated & Custom Food Services, Inc. 1587 A Aviall, Inc. 1608 H Azle Chamber of Commerce 1536 A Baker & Botts 1622 M Balch Springs Chamber of Commerce i I, 1 10 a F , Z ~gee'IN,, •-f 1036 A Bank One, Texas, N.A. Apendalt We ' 1650 A Bank One, Texas, NA-Fort worth of 70~ q 1559 A The Barr Company, Printers 1037 A Bates Container Inc. 1038 A Baylor University Medical Center 1042 A City of Bedford 1043 A Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. 1 1482 M Benbrook Area Chamber of Commerce 1046 A Berger Engineering Company 1717 M Best Southwest Chamber of Commerce 1613 A Booth, Inc. 1593 A Bowie Chamber of Commerce 1509 A Bramalea Texas Inc. 1430 A Bridgeport Area Chamber 1637 M Burleson Area Chamber of Commerce 1061 A Burlington Northern Railroad 1709 A CAE-Link Corporation 1064 A Caltex Petroleum Corporation 1484 A Canon U.S.A., Inc. 1723 A Cantey i Hanger 1065 A City of Carrollton 1066 A Carter & Burgess, Inc. 1067 A Case Power and Equipment 1068 M Cedar Hill Chamber of commerce 1069 A City of Cedar Hill 1523 A Centex Bateson Company 1070 A Centex Corporation 1521 A Centex Homes 1606 A Central and South West Corporation ~,pL F +QAOd2110. 1072 A Century 21, South Central States, Inc. AgendaltA 1062 A CH2M Hill late OU01 3 7 1586 A Champion Partners 1684 A Charles Willis i Associates, Inc. 10'17 A Chemical Lime, inc. 1073 M Dallas Chinese Chamber of Commerce 1726 A Cinnabarr 1078 A Citizens National Bank 1079 A City Center Development Co. 1624 M Cleburne Chamber of Commerce 1574 A C1ubCorp International 1081 A Coca-Cola Enterprises - Texas 1083 M Colleyville Area Chamber of Commerce 1084 A City of Colleyville 1034 A Colliers Baldwin, Inc. 1435 A Collin County Community College 1085 A Collmer Semiconductor i 1086 A Color Tile, Inc. 1088 A Commercial Metals 1082 A CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc. y 1649 A Compass Bank-Dallas i 1551 A Continental Plaza 1090 A Contran Corporation 1091 A Coopers d Lybrand 1092 A Coors Distributing company 1653 M Coppell Chamber of Commerce 1093 A City of Coppell z, 1478 A Corgan Associates Architects 1525 A Corsicana Industrial Foundation i i j f s. ~pertdaNo k' 1621 M Crowley Area Chamber of Commerce Agertdalle Date 39 1522 A CTX Mortgage Company 1518 A Cushman & Wakefield of Texas, Inc. 1528 A Dallas Area Rapid Transit Authority 1628 M Dallas Asian American Chamber of Commerce 1641 M Dallas Slack Chamber of Commerce 1101 M Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce 1102 M Dallas Council on World Affairs 1.179 A Dallas County Community College District 1103 A Dallas County Land Title Association 1547 A The Dallas Grand Hotel 1104 A Dallas Market Center Company, Ltd. 1108 A City of Dallas 1109 A Dallas/Fort Worth Airport Marriott Hotel 1112 A Darr Equipment Company 1387 A DDB Needham Worldwide Dallas Group 1441 A Economic Dev. Team of Decatur { 1116 A John Deere Company 1385 A Deloitte & Touche Company 1117 A Delta Air Lines, Inc. 1118 M Denton Chamber of Commerce 1119 A City of Denton 1716 A Dentool, Inc. t 1113 M DeSoto Chamber of Commerce 1114 A City of DeSoto 1698 M Development Corporation of Wylie, Inc. 1115 A DeVry Institute of Technology 1694 A Digital Equipment Corporation 1488 A DSC Communications Corporation i ,I v: a, d y 9 :a ' ~6Ad8N0, ~ , 1129 M Duncanville Chamber of Commerce ageitQalS gate 7- 1131 A City of Duncanville 3Do~ 1134 M Greater East Dallas Chamber of Commerce c~ 7 1139 A Electronic Data Systems Corp. 1143 M Ennis Chamber of Commerce 1145 A Equitable Real Estate Investment Management 1721 A Express One International 1532 A Exxon Corporation 1611 A Faison-Stone Las Colinas, Inc. 1148 A City of Farmers Branch 1673 M Farmersville Chamber of Commerce 1728 A First National Bank of Grapevine 1515 A First Southwest Company 1157 M Flower Mound Chamber of Commerce 1704 A Town of Flower Mound 1159 M Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce 1676 M Fort Worth Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 1160 A Fort Worth Land Title Association 1161 A Fort Worth Star-Telegram 1162 A City of Fort Worth 1719 A Fowlkes, Normnn 6 Association, Ino. 1554 A FoxMeyer Corp. 1163 A Freese and Nichols, Inc. 1634 M French-American Chamber of Commerce 1542 A Friberg Associates Inc. 1164 M Frisco Chamber of Commerce 1643 M Frisco Economic Development Corporation i 1700 A City of Frisco i 1658 A Fujitsu Network Transmission Systems i i a . G genoanu 1513 M FW Metropolitan Black Chamber of Commerce igendalte Oate 1170 A Gainesville Area Chamber of Commerce % a9 1171 A City of Gainesville J 1172 A Gardere & Wynne 1173 M Garland Chamber of Commerce 1174 A City of Garland f 1459 A Gordon Boswell Flowers, Inc. 1181 M Grand Prairie Chamber of Commerce 1182 A City of Grand Prairie 1651 M Greater Celina Chamber of Commerce 1526 M Greater Dallas Hispanic Chamber of Commerce i 1492 A Greater Fort Worth Association of Realtors 1675 A Green Oaks Inn & Conference Center 1184 A Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc. 1630 M Greenville Chamber of commerce 1186 A Greiner Engineering, Inc. 1686 A GSW Travel, Inc 1167 A GTE Directoriat Corporation 1168 A GTE Texas/flew Mexico 1 1188 A Guaranty Federal Bank F.S.B. 1195 A Ebby Halliday, Realtors 1463 A Harris Methodist Health Plan 1451 A Harvey Hotel Company 1199 A Hayes Leasing Company, Inc. R 1682 A Haynes and Boone, L.L.P. 1191 A HCB Contractors 1531 M HEB Sconomic Development Foundation, Inc. i 1201 A Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc. i 1670 A Herman !Biller, Inc. 1 i 'L 6 Y q ndaNo 1205 A Hewlett Packard Company %cirdalte lite 1457 A Hillard Auto Park 1209 A Hitachi Semiconductor (America), Inc. 1126 A Host Marriott 1214 A Ward Howell International Inc. IIy 4 1724 A Hughes Training, Inc. I1 " 1712 M Hurst-Euless-Bedford Chamber IIII}I 1217 A Hyatt-Regency DFW i 1697 A IBM Corporation F 1674 A Imprimis Group, Inc. 1219 A Industrial Properties Corporation 1222 H Irving Chamber of Commerce { 1699 M Irving Economic Development Foundation I 1224 A City of Irving 1529 A Jackson-Shaw Realty 1225 A JCPenney Company, Inc. 1230 A Johnson & Wortley }I4 1548 N Johnson County Economic Development Commissio 1231 A Johnson Equipment Company 1687 A Jones & Neuse, Inc. 4 1233 A Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue ` 1703 A Jordan-DeLaurenti, Inc. 1234 A Justin Industries, Inc. 1235 A Kaiser Permanents 171Q •M Kaufman Chamber of Commerce 1236 A Ben E. Keith Company 1635 N Keller Chamber of Commerce 1237 A City of Keller i 1629 M Kennedale Chamber of Commerce I 4 . 4 ~ 5 AOendaNo ~ P 1688 A Kenneth E. McDonald a Assciates, Inc. A4endahe 1240 A Kimbell, Inc. X18 S p~39 1560 A The Kroger Co. 1693 A KVG Gideon Toal, Inc. 1567 A Laidlaw Waste Systems i .42z; M Lake Granbury Area Chamber of Commerce 1663 M Lake Worth Area Chamber of Commerce 1533 M Lancaster Chamber of Commerce 1246 A City of Lancaster 1661 A Law Engineering, Inc. 1660 A Lawyers American Title Company 1251 A Lennox International Inc. 1715 A Lewis Label Products 1252 M Lewisville Chamber of Commerce 1253 A City of Lewisville 1256 A Locke Purnell Rain Harrell 1177 A Lockheed Fort Worth Company 1 1257 A Lomas Financial Corporation 1708 A Lone Star Airlines 1258 A Lone Ftar Gas Company 1706 A Lone Star Jockey Club 1260 A The Long-Term Credit Bank of Japan, Ltd. 1610 A Loral Vought Systems Corporation 1546 A Luther King Capital Management 1266 A Maguire/Thomas Partners f 1645 M Mansfield Chamber of Commerce 1662 A MAPSCO, Inc. 1506 A Marriott Solana 1620 A Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc. .r~~ 1, ` a w ~endaNo 4;endalSem_ 1273 A Maxus Energy Corporation Date 1618 A MBS Holdings, Ino. 1275 A McCall, Parkhurst & Horton 1277 M McKinney Chamber of Commerce 1276 A City of McKinney 1279 A Mercantile Corporation 1644 N Mesquite Chamber of Commerce 1282 A City of Mesquite 1264 M METROCRESP Chamber of Commerce 1442 M Midlothian Chamber & Development commission j 1661 A Milliman & Robertson 1519 A Minyard Food Stores, Inc. { ~ 1616 A Mitsubishi International Corporation 1657 A Mobil Land Development 1032 A Mrs Baird's Bakeries, Ino. 1565 A Munoz Printing Company, Inc. 1543 A Murray Realtors 1791 A NationsBank Texas 1290 A NCH Corporation 1735 A Nestle Distribution CO. i 1293 A Nicol Scales, Inc. 1295 M North Dallas Chamber of Commerce 1296 A City of North Richland Hills 1297 M The Northeast Tarrant Chamber of Commerce 1691 A O'Brien-Kreitzborg & Associates, Inc. 1301 M Oak Cliff Chamber of Commerce 1604 A Omni Mandalay Hotel 1617 A OmniAmerican Federal credit Union 1445 A osteopathic Health System of Texaa % a . ynry i . s '7Yjy i z } AgendaNo.- 1702 A Overton Bank and Trust Agendalt n 1306 A Padgett Printing corporation U3'8 ^s 9 1573 A Paul Ray Berndtson 1312 A KPMG Peat Marwick 1678 A PHH Homequity 1315 A Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 1636 H Pilot Point Chamber of Commerce 1672 A Placid oil company 1317 M Plano Chamber of Commerce 1625 M Plano Economic Development Board ' 1318 A City of Plano 1321 A Presbyterian Healthcare System 1530 A Pro Staff Personnel services 1683 A R R Donnelley i Sons Company 1667 A R"ognition International, Inc. 1665 M Red Oak. Area Chamber of Commerce t~ 1683 A Resource Marketing, Inc. I Lj 1330 M Richardson Chamber of Commerce 1331 A City of Richardson 1685 A City of Rich' ,d Hills 1633 H Roanoke Chamber of commerce 1627 M Rockwall Chamber of Commerce 1336 A Rosewood Corporation 1626 M Rowlett Chamber of Commerce 1326 A RTKL Associates Inc. 1639 M Ruaslan-American Chamber of Commerce 1520 A Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce 1571 A Sanus Texas Health Plan, Inc. i 1711 M Seagoville Chamber of Commerce E' x agendMo 1350 A Se ars Roebuck Co. kgen1228 A Sedgwick James of Texas, Inc. 1731 A Shady Oaks Country club 1601 A Sheraton Grand Hotel 1353 A Sheraton Park Central Hotel 1588 A Simpson i Associates, Inc. 1355 A Six Flags Over Texas, Inc. j 1356 A Sky Chefs, Inc. 1692 A Slaughter industries 1659 A Smith i Moore, L.L.P. E 1638 M South East Dallas Chamber of Commerce 1714 M Southern Dallas Development Corporation 1359 M Southlane Economic Development council 1360 A The Southland Corporation 1362 A Southwestern Bell Telephone Company 1364 A Spaeth Communications, Inc. 1713 M Springtown Chamber of Commerce 1707 A Sprint 1677 M Stemmons Corridor Business Association 1705 A Stone i Webster Engineering Corporation 11369 A Stouffer Dallas Hotel a 1549 A Sumitomo Corporation of America 1669 A T-Fort Worth Transportation Authority 1656 M Taiwanese Chamber of Commerce of D/FW 1377 A Tandy Corporation 1605 A Target Market Publishing i Advertising inc. 1654 M Tarrant County Asian American Chamber 1374 A Tarrant County Junior College District 1710 M Terrell Chamber of Commerce _I e ,F ~gen 11NO 1462 A Texas Christian University 4gendalte ''~.Z, _ lie 3r 1379 A Texas Commerce Bank 1380 A Texas instruments Incorporated 1595 A Texas Jet, Inc. 1581 A Texas Rangers Baseball Club 1631 M The Colony Chamber of Commerce 1701 A Thomas Cook Currency Services, Inc. 1440 A Thompson & Knight, P.C. 1099 A Tom Thumb Food & Pharmacy 1640 A Traftell Crow Dallas/Fort Worth, Inc. 1390 A Trinity Industries, Inc. 1373 A TU Electric Company 1730 A Turner Collie & Braden Inc. 1642 M U.B. Chamber of Commerce 1660 A Union Pacific Resources Company 1393 A United Parcel Service 1648 M United states-Mexico Chamber of Commerce 1395 A University of North Texas 1396 A The University of Texas at Arlington 1504 A UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 1( 1376 A Vantage Companies 1668 A Waste Management, Inc. South Croup 1403 M Waxahachie Chamber of Commerce 1404 A City of Waxahachie 1666 M Weatherford Chamber of Commerce 1447 M Weatherford/Parker County it. Econ. Dev. Coop 1405 A Weaver and Tidwell, L.L.P. 1734 A Welcome Neighbors 1407 A Westinghouse Electric Corp. w. a Y . r r J ' gendaND 1652 H White Settlement Chamber of Commerce Agerdalt 1408 A City of White settlement rate ' 'V~."7p 1695 A White, Hill, Sims i Wiggins, LLP J 1570 A Wilcox Realty Croup, Inc. 1409 A Williamson Printing Corporation 1411 A Winn-Dixie Texas, Inc. a 1412 A Winstead, Sechrest i Hinick, P.C. 1725 A Witherspoon 1414 A woodbine Deveioprar,t corporation 1417 A Worthington hotel ' 1418 A The Wyatt Company 1696 A City of Wylie 1419 A Xerox Corporation ~W~=~+~~~as yeeaa~~as~s~~~~a~~sescsaaaa~~~ap'~~s~aas~~aaas~iafi~~e~aar~sasz~a~~ Counts 358 I I Ji ~J . I I I i r r 6 MvY• k° a F Y ' t } ' ATTACHMENT E I CHAMBER 2111 ' Como BiRE r~" gaf.g9 i July 15, 1994 r Mr. Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 7EP201 Dear Lloyd: Regarding the North Texas Commission, I have always advocated the need for a strong, central organization which could unify and promote the diverse collection of communities known as the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. Although the scope, mission and leadership of the North Texas Commission have gone through numerous changes over the past decade, I personally feel like it has the best potential for retaining a commonly accepted role as our regional economic development organization. We have seen the North Texas Commission assume these roles in recent years through its involvement in the Matsushita project, the 1-35 Corridor campaign and the Dallas-Fort i i Worth Film Commission. ' Since ly, I 1 ( 1 Charles W. Carpenter President & General 7anager s S9 i ACCN[DITI0 414 PARKWAY !•0. DRAWER / • DENTON, LIRAS 76202.1719 • (617} 382.969] i J ~C ITS COUNCI i~ lit, ♦ hf O Q~ to sZ 0 0 a for tt Cp0 Y t ~ a t ~4oe,~daNo ~ A0ee0a11 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES We /b June 14, 1994 % The Council convened into the Executive Session on Tuesday, June 14, 1994, at 5:15 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of City Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem. Brock; Council Members Chew, Cott, Perry, Miller and Smith. ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss the following: A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071 B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.072 C. Personnel/Board Appointzents Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.074 1 The Council convened into the Work Session on Tuesday, June 14, 1994 at 6:00 p.m. in the council Chambers of City Hall. PRESENTS Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Brock; Council Members Chew, Cott, Perry, Miller and Smith. ABSENT: None 1. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding recommendations from the Juvenile Diversion Twit Force. Dalton Gregory, Chair - Juvenile Diversion Task Force, stated that j the Task Force had developed three recommendations for Council consideration. Several ideas reoccurred during their discussions which helped shape those recommendations. Those ideas were (1) juveniles were important people, (2) everyons needed to accept responsibility rather than putting responsibility off on someone else and (3) if nothing were done, the situation would get worse. Locally, there was an increase in juvenile crime and the beginning appearances of gang activities. The three recommendations from the Task Force were merely a starting point. The first recommendation from the Task Forte, was to create a teen court. The main purpose of a teen court un%!4 be to determine what types of consequences would be approp::iat.~ for an offender. The second recommendation was that the City contract with Youth and Family services for their first offender program. This program would assist youth who were having family problems which might have contributed to the offense. The third recommendation was to create a juvenile crime interagency coalition. The coalition would promote understanding, facilitate coordination and cooperation among agencies involved in juvenile issues. The coalition would continue the work started by the Task Force, with a major responsibility being an annual report to Council regarding the activities of the teen court. 9,A i ` Q M Y ~ r o r p t aAeada Ho. ~ 3 Agendas - ~ City of Denton city council minutes Itd June 14, 1994 m Page 2 Council Member Miller stated that he was impressed with the recommendations. He felt that all three recommendations needed to be done and not only one or two, Gregory replied that there were interrelationships among all three j recommendations. j Council Member Miller asked if there were any instances when a teen court did not work. Gregory replied not to his knowledge. Most communities were very happy with such a court and had even expanded their original teen court. Judge Darlene Whitten stated that she had researched a number of different programs and no one indicated dissatisfaction with such a court. Council Member Miller asked if the program was aimed to get the t juvenile to deal with issues and hopefully not be a repeat 1 offender. I Gregory replied yes that an important goal was to decrease juvenile crime and to decrease repeat offenders. Judge Whitten stated that she had recommended cases to Youth and Family Services with good responses. Dana Slatter, Youth and Family Services, stated that the agency had been in existence since 1981. Of the children who had completed the program, 83; were not repeat tffenders. The main goal of the i program was diversion and the prevention of going to court again. I Council Member Cott asked who was taken into the program. Slatter replied that there w a three tier hierarchy for the program. Council Member Cott asked for their annual budget. Slatter replied that their total budget was $1290360. Council Member Smith asked if they used volunteer counseling it their program. Slatter replied that they had four staff therapists witt% masters k degrees and was a training site for TWU, UNT and UTA graduate students. v i . r .t 64 A~eodaNo Agodalte Date6 City of Denton City Council Minutes June 14, 1994 Page 3 Council Member Smith asked about the size of the case load for the counselors. o,.otter replied that they had part-time therapists for family therapy and those therapists saw between 14-16 families per week. City Manager Harrell stated that these programs would involve cost items for lmplementation. The Task Force had recommended that the City of Denton, the DISD and Denton County plus one civic agency serve as sponsors for the teen court program. The three major sponsors should share the cost for the initial year of the program. Gregor yy replied that the governmental agencies could provide f`inanoial support in addition to federal grunts. The grant money would not be available immediately but he There was a other pnon-profit organizations which could offer support. of creating a non-profit organization to operate the teen court. j He felt that interagency cooperation was important and if an agency { contributed in terms of dollars, there would be more interagency involvement. Mayor Pro Tom Brock asked if thei3 was any hard data regarding repeat offenders going through a teen court. ~ Gregory replied that the programs were so different that it was j hard to gather such data. t Council Member Hiller stated that part of the design of a teen court cost was predicated on members of the Bar Association acting as judges. He asked if the Bar had agreed to do this. Gregory stated that the Bar had not been formally contacted but felt that there would his or problem with such a request. There were many options for t 2. 'rho Council received CIP Program. regarding the implementation of the 199 Jon Fortune, Bwiget Officer, reviewed the CIP calendar for the year. Mayor Pro Tem. Brock stated that the minutes of the Planning and zoning commission indicated a concern about the drainage issues but not Flo worked into the recommendations and that those questioned why ethat s were not Commission meetingwording which was Planni g and ton grecommendation usedu at thereplied i c 1 t r ` i A4endaNo _au Apdaller►t,1 y ' Date City of Denton city council minutes June 14, 1994 Page 4 City Manager Harrell stated that there had been some discussion that the ciP would be a City packaged CIP which would go to the citizens. A citizen committee would be formed to evaluate all programs and reorder them if needed. That would provide time to give priority to drainage issues if needed. The City was out of bond authority after this year and most of the projects would require some type of bond authorization. Fortune indicated that the back-up materials included a map of the drainage projects and street projects. Council Member Cott asked that the drainage issues be reviewed. Fortune stated that the first drainage projects, proposed for the j year 1996-97, were the Cooper Creek Channel-Phase I and the Avenue I G drainage project. It was proposed to do Pecan Creek from Ruddell to Woodrow; Fletcher Branch at Indian Ridge; Cooper Branch; Good Samaritan Village; Cooper Creek from Windsor Drive to Bell Avenue; and Coit Street drainage in 1997-98. Council Member Perry asked about Payne Drive. Fortune replied that that was considered a street project with associated drainagc. Eagle Drive; Pecan Creek from Bradshaw to the main channels Pecan Creek drainage near Robertson; Alice Street drainage; and Dallas Drive drainaga ;:are proposed projects for the fifth year. City Manager Harrell stated that this recommended 5 year CIP was projected to be done without a tax increase. As current bond projects were paid off and with a slow rate of growth in assessed value, thia prop~.sed level of improvement could be accommodated. There was a large list of projects submitted !ihich could not be done without a tax increase. Those wore projects which needed to be done but which could not be done in the five year program. Council Member Cott asked what was the drainage issue. City Manager Harrell replied that flooding in yards or in a floodway area where it was not possible to build was the main issue. Fortune reviewed the categories under which the projects were listed. He stated that Council had a tour of the proposed CIP projects last year and suggested scheduling another tour for this year. y I I AgOPONo. ~da 3 Agendaltem S ~ - Date City of Denton city council Minutes yy~~ June 14, 1994 Page 4 l I1 City Manager Harrell stated that there had been some discussion that the CIP would be a City packaged CIP which would go to the citizens. A citizen committee would be formed to evaluate all programs and reorder them if needed. That would provide time to give priority to drainage issues if needed. The City was out of bond authority after this year and most of the projects would require some type of bond authorization. Fortune indicated that the back-up materials included a map of the drainage projects and street projects. Council Member Cott asked that the drainage issues be reviewed. Fortune stated that the first drainage projects, proposed for the year 1996-97, were the Cooper Creek Channel-Phase I and the Avenue G drainage project. It was proposed to do Pecan Creek from Ruddeil to Woodrow; Fletcher Branch at Indian Ridge; Cooper Branch; Good Samaritan Village; Cooper Creek from Windsor Drive to Bell Avenue, and Coit Street drainage in 1997-98. Council Member Perry asked about Payne Drive. Fortune replied that that was considered a street project with associated drainage. Eagle Drive; Pecan Creek from Bradshaw to the main channel; Pecan Creek drainage near Robertson; Alice Street drainage; and Dallas Drive drainage were proposed projects for the fifth year. City Manager Harrell stated that this recommended 5 year CIP was projected to be done without a tax increase. As current bond projects were paid off and with a slow rate of growth in assessed } value, this proposed level of improvement could be accommodated. There was a large list of projects submitted which could not ;e done without a tax increase. Those were projects which needed to be done but which could not be done in the five year program. Council Member Cott asked what was the drainage issue. City Manager Harrell replied that flooding in yards or in a floodway area where it was not possible to build was the main issue. Fortune reviewed the categories under which the projects were listed. He stated that Council had a tour of the proposed CIP projects last year and suggested scheduling another tour for this year. r "r +gendaNa 4pendal( late _ City of Denton City Council Minutes 5&~ 16 June 14, 1994 Page 5 City Manager Harrell stated that the proposed fifth year of the CIP presented new projects which the Council had not discussed in prior meetings. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, presented the drainage projects. (1) Eagle Drive from Avenue A to Locust Street - the current system was undersized and had flooding during heavy rains. (2) Pecan street from Bradshaw to the main channel - this currently was an earthen channel with erosions along the back lots of some of the houses. (3) Pecan near Robertson - north of Robertson there were three old culverts which were undersized plus there was a need to enlarge the culverts under the railroad tracks. This would also help Robertson Street under the tracks as the area flooded during heavy rains. (4) Ellis Street at Panhandle - there were two channels at this point with a small pipe system which was undersized. (5) Dallas Drive at Willow springs - improvements here would help Willow Springs with an underground pipe to a new channel north of 4Iillow Springs. ti Mayor Pro Tem Brock asked if the projected cost of the projects included rebuilding the streets which were damaged during drainage construction. Svehla replied correct that the project always included the } rebuilding of the streets. Mayor Pro Tem Brock stated that those figures were then not included in the street projects. Svehla replied correct. Rich Dlugas, Director of Parks and Recreation reviewed the projects associated with parks and recreation. (1) University Drive from Malone to Spring Valley - existing bonds and matching dollars from the State would landscape those medians. (2) Master Trails/ Phase I which would develop a hike/bike plan for the City. This would be a 13 mile trail system with four major corridors. (3) Phase II of South Lakes Park which would expand the trails, develop a second lake with picnic facilities and security lighting. This would include a match from the Texab Wildlife Department. (4) Athletic field renovation and development would include renovation at Evers Park, Mack Park and Denia Park for paving parking lots and providing restrooms. Rick Svehla, Depv.ty City Manager, presented the proposed engineering/ street projects. (1) Miscellaneous street construction was a program for maintenance and street construction but no definite streets had been determined at this point in time. Eli agendaNo. ~u ~0 Agendattam `7 Dale City of Denu.a City Council minutes b 0~fv June 14, 1994 Page 6 (2) sidewalk repairs also did not have definite projects at this point in time. (3) Southeast Denton sidewalks would provide sidewalks on one side of Lakey Street (Prairie to Morse), Willow springs, Duncan and Smith (Dallas Drive to Hill) and Kerley (Morse to Scott). (4) Avenue A paving would be between Prairie Street and chestnut street and would keep the street at its current width. (5) Willowwood paving and drainage (option II) would rebuild from Bonnie Brae to Bernard Street and would fund drainage improvements between McCormick and Bernard Street. (6) Mockingbird Lane connection would construct a curved connection at Paisley replacing the existing dog leg. i Gary Collins, Director of Information Services, stated that the proposed CIP included a replacement and upgrade of all obsolete computer equipment both hardware and software. Outdated equipment was still being used in some offices and this proposal would upgrade both the software and hardware. City Manager Harrell stated that staff would be presenting a recommendation to fund a study of information service needs within the City and develop a strategy to modernize that system. If Council agreed with the funding for the study, more specific needs could be addressed. Council Member Cott asked if the study would determine how to spend the money. City Manager Harrell stated that the study would be an assessment of what the City currently had, what was needed and a recommendation. Currently there were operational problems with some of the older equipment. 11i 1 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, presented the airport projects. Projects (1 and 2) involved the extension of the existing runway to the north with taxi lanes and land acquisition for that extension. Project (3) involved the construction of more general aviation aprons for the planes. Each project had some federal dollars associated with the project. Council Member Cott asked about public input regarding the extension. Svehla replied that public hearings had already been held regarding the issue. City Manager Harrell stated that the proposal presented increased flexibility even with a no tax increase situation. The fourth year would increase to $6 million and the fifth year to $10 million due E t ~gendaNo. al ~1-✓2 19 ez AgenAalte nee 7- i~ City of Denton City Council Minutes 74 /6 June 14, 1994 Page 7 to the effect of delaying the projects. Jim Harder, Director of Electric Utilities, highlighted some of the electric projects. (1) Distribution substations would relieve the existing substations plus include a new substation in the downtown area. (2) Central dispatch building would provide a communications area near the power plant to centralize the dispatch functions. (3) over to under conversions dealt with the University Avenue widening project which would take the power lines from over the street to under the street. (4) System expansion within the immediate service territory was needed due to the growth of Denton in increased subdivisions. (5) Power pr-)duction replacement would reserve money for the project but there were no definite recommendations ready until the completion of the power supply study. Council Member Cott asked what would be an alternative to a central dispatch building. Harder replied that the proposal was for a dispatch center and module construction. There was a great need for at least a s dispatch center. Jerry Cosgrove, Water Engineering Administrator, highlighted the water utility projects. (1) New water plant/transmission line at Lake Ray Roberts; (2) Booster Station; (3) Elevated storage tanks; (4) Distribution system upgrade; (5) Replace water lines; (6) Field i services replacement of waterlines which was an in-house program; (7) Development of plan water lines for economic development candidates; (8) oversize water lines would work with developers to oversize water lines; (9) Taps, fire hydrant and field equipment would replace old equipment; (10) Computer equipment would renovate the supervisory control equipment at the water plant as the current system was difficult to analyze; (11) Disinfection system modification would allow for any necessary modifications for compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act; (12) 135 waterline would extend from Exposition Mills north for new customers in the area and for wholesale water to UTRWD and Sanger; and (13) State highway relocations would allow funding for the relocation of water/bewer lines due to State highway projects. Wastewater projects included (1) Wastewater treatment plant improvements which would include a composting facility; (2) Wastewater treatment plant expansion; (3) Liftstation improvements; (4) Collection system upgrade; (5) Replacement of sewer lines as the current system was in poor shape in some areas and needed some improvements; (6) Development of a plan sewer line for economic development; (7) oversize wastewater lines; (8) Infiltration/inflow p , I, agendaNo oJy-~2 Awdaltem Date T / . gy City of Denton City Council Minutes 74 /6 June 14, 1994 Page 7 to the effect of delaying the projects. Jim Harder, Director of Electric Utilities, highlighted some of the electric projects. (1) Distribution substations would relieve the existing substations plus include a new substation in the downtown area. (2) Central dispatch building would provide a communications area near the power plant to centralize the dispatch functions. (3) over to under conversions dealt with the University Avenue widening project which would take the power lines from over the street to under the street. (4) System expansion within the immediate service territory was needed due to the growth of Denton in increased subdivisions. (5) Power production replacement would reserve money for the project but there were no definite recommendations ready until the completion of the power supply study. i Council Member Cott asked what would be an alternative to a central dispatch building. Harder replied that the proposal was for a dispatch center and module construction. There was a great need for at least a dispatch center. Jerry Cosgrove, Water Engineering Administrator, highlighted the water utility projects. (1) New water plant/transmission line at Lake Ray Roberts; (2) Booster Station; (3) Elevated storage tanks; (4) Distribution system upgrade; (5) Replace water lines; (6) Field services replacement of waterlines which was an in-house program; (7) Development of plan water lines for economic development candidates; (8) oversize water lines would work with developers to oversize water lines; (9) Taps, fire hydrant and field equipment would replace old equipment; (10) Computer equipment would renovate the supervisory control equipment at the water plant as the current system was difficult to analyze; (11) Disinfection system modification would allow for any necessary modifications for compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act; (12) 135 waterline would extend from Exposition Mills north for new customers in the area and for wholesale water to UTRWD and Sanger; and (13) State highway relocations would allow funding for the relocation of water/sewer lines due to State highway projects. Wastewater projects included (1) Wastewater treatment plant improvements which would include a composting facility; (2) Wastewater treatment plant expansion; (3) Liftstation improvements, (4) Collection system upgrade; (5) Replacement of sewer lines as the current system was in poor shape in some areas and needed some improvements; (6) Development of a plan sewer line for economic development; (7) oversize wastewater lines; (8) Infiltration/inflow x .W t P agenda iw Agenda Date _ City of Denton City Council Minutes June 14, 1994 Page 8 studies; (9) Taps and field equipment; (10) Laboratory improvements; (11) State highway relocations such as the University Drive project. Council hember Cott asked how far away the City was from wastewater capacity. Cosgrove replied that it depended on the section of the City and whether it was wet or dry weather. Charlie Watkins, superintendent of Solid Waste, presented the solid waste projects. There was a higher dollar amount request than in previous years due to the landfill expansion and recycling projects. (1) Communication equipment would replace an outdated communication system; (2) Container improvements upgrade would replace deteriorating units; (3) Landfill expansion as it related to property acquisition; (4) Permitting at the landfill which required a consultant; (5) Recycling site additions included three additional sites and improvements at the existing sites; and (6) Recycling equipment for the design work for an intermediate processing facility. Council Member Cott suggested contracting out recycling. Nelson replied that that was an option the Committee would be looking into. He indicated projected utility rate increases for years 1995-99. The electric rate would increase 2%, 3t, 43, 5%, and 68 from 1995-99. Water would increase 2%, Or 4$, O, and 8% over the years. Wastewater rates would increase 8%, 8%, 6%, Ot and 4%. Solid waste residential rates would have a 7.60%, 6.7%0 7%, 6.63, and 6.85% increase over the years. Commercial solid waste would have an increase of 9.95*,8t, 84, 8% and 7% increase over the years 1995-1999. 3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the Leadership Denton projects. City Manager Harrell stated that Council Member Miller had requested that these reports from Leadership Denton be placed on an agenda for council consideration. Council Member Miller stated that the report concerning planning and zoning in Denton had a statement that the 1988 Development plan "has been amended twice to accommodate new development needs and requests made by the city, with input and/or complaints from developers, but any further changes must wait until the city has completed its 'Vision' project." t rt., ~.d ~ganaa~vu y © ~ Agendaitero S Date City of Denton City Council Minutes June 14, 1994 Page 9 City Manager Harrell stated that when the original plan was done, a great number of citizens were included on the Committee. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the Plan needed to be updated but realized that such a project would involve many of the same people involved in the Vision effort. It was felt that it would be better timing to complete the first phase of the Vision Project before starting another large community undertaking. Council Member Miller stated that the Plan developed in 1988 needed to be dynamic rather than static and that there should be an on- going task force for such an issue. He asked if a mechanism for continual review had been considered. Robbins replied that the new plan addressed a review of the plan every five years. Council Member Miller suggested considering some type of on-going group to review the plan rather than the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Pro Tem Brock stated that the report indicated that the Plan was amended twice to accommodate new development. She felt that there had been other changes during the years. Robbins replied that there had been two amendments to the concept map which defined the study areas. A provision had been added with respect to greenbelts. No other amendments were done to the map or the policy. There had been additions to the policy but no amendment to policy statement. Council Member Chew had a few comments regarding the report on Unify Denton. He expressed problems with the conclusions of the report and questioned the number of people interviewed in order to draw those conclusions. He also felt there was not a good data base from which to draw conclusions. He opposed and disagreed with the conclusions of the report. Mayor Pro Tom Brock stated that the groups went about their work very seriously and even if one might disagree with some of the rese;.ich techniques, she felt that their intentions were good Legarding the studies. Council Member Miller felt that some of the data collected needed to be refined so as to compare it on an equal basis. He felt there was a need to know the impact of the students in Denton on the studies and that there were some incorrect statistics regarding population growth. Denton's population might not grow as much as surrounding cities but it would provide job growth in Denton. Over 1 Agend3No ageidaltem i Date ~ / 9 City of Denton City Council Minutes June 14, 1994 Page 10 a period of time it was important to refine data. Mayor Pro Tem Brock indicated that the study had relied on the Weinstein report which indicated that Denton had a serious liability regarding development and had an antibusiness and antigrowth reputation. She questioned what that data was based on. She knew many individuals who had experience developing in other communities who had commented on how easy it was to do business in Denton. She felt it might be individuals with private agendas who started the perception that Denton was antibusiness. Other cities now had development ordinances similar to Denton's, some of which were more restrictive than Denton's. She felt that the City needed to inform people about the measures the City had taken and ordinances which were in place that encouraged development such as the utility plan lines. There was a need to remind people about the measures the City had in place for economic development. Council Member Cott stated that the reports were done by a group of individuals who were trying to earn their way and the reports might be less than perfect. City government and the Chamber needed to learn how to work together. He felt there was a division between the two entities which needed to be bridged. Mayor Pro Tem Brock stated that her previous comments were in response, not to the Leadership Denton people, but to the f quotations from an earlier report from the Center of Economic Development. Council Member Perry stated that he would like see to data which would show a city of similar size to Denton which had done more to promote economic development. Mayor Castleberry stated that good things had happened in Denton such as the outlet mall, a divisional headquarters and number of small businesses which had locateu in Denton. While there might have been a time when Denton was antibusiness, that time was gone. Denton was in favor of business and wanted new business. He felt that Denton would continue to receive new business as it was a great location and had good offerings for new business. j 4. The Council considered nominations and appointments to the City-'s Boards and Commissions. The Council made nominations for various Boards and commissions. (Attachment A) Mayor Castleberry indicated that Tom Harpool was eligible for reappointment to TMPA and nominated him for that position. On roll ...-4 gendaNO qy' igendaltem bte - 1 -7 ' City of Denton city council minutes l~6 June 14, 1994 Page 11 vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS S CITY SECRETARY t CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS A00001E7 i i i I i i R ~ 23, ATTACHMENT A AgendaNo 4gendalt r Rate 7, 7 BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS 1994-95 1►IRPORT ADVI80RY BOARD Diat CURRENT MEMBER KQKIMTION TEBZS ~4iIN~IL John Dulemba John Oulemba 1992-94 Mayor 1992-94 Perry 3 Nancy ttundley 4 James Jamieson James Jamieson 1992-94 Cott Jim Risser 1992-94 Miller 5 Jim Risser 11~-sr sRBLTER ADnI80RY 5 Jim Risser CURB MNMEMBER LiQMiNATt93I T~~ D= 2 Mary McKay Joe11a Orr 1991-94 Smith p ~ ~r~ r,rrRStFNT MEMBER NOMINATION ~ 5 Rebecca King Rebecca King 1992-94 Millar 1992-94 Smith 2 Marr.ia Staff ~J 4 V}.CANT (ALT) 1993-95 Cott NUILDING COD= BOARD COUNCIL i ' DIST CURRENT MEMBER F,QMINATION TFi8I1 1992-94 Perry 3 James Fykes (ALT) t 1992-94 Cott 4 Bob George (ALT) 5 Steve Kniatt Steve Kniatt 1992-94 Miller 1992-94 Brock 6 Isabel Miller Greg Muirhead Greg Muirbead 1992-94 Mayor t rri, genUaNO 'Q agenda+t Sete : I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ApI80RY COMMITTEE DI ST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 5 Dorothy Martinez Dorothy Martinez 1992-94 Miller 6 Peggy Fox Peggy Fox 1992-94 Brock 7 Fred Hill 1992-94 Mayor 3 Curtis Ramsey 1932-94 Perry i 5 Rey Trejo Ann Hatch 1992-94 Miller j DATA PROCE88IN0 ADVI80RY BoUp DIST' ~URFF2.NT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL Ill 3 2 Rosa Lawton Rosa Lawton 1992-94 Smith 3 Robert W. Minnie 1992-94 Perry 4 Brian Scott 1992-94 Cott DOWNTOWN A2VI8ORY BOARD pL~T CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TIE{ COUNCIL 3 Geneva Berg _ Geneva Berg 1992-94 Perry ! 4 BeBe Olufsen 1992-94 Cott 5 Fred Patterson Joy Williams 1992-94 Miller 6 Barbara Philips Michael F1anaAan 1992-94 Brock 7 Rahna Raney Rahna Raney 1992-94 Mayor i ELECTRICAL CODE BOARD pI~S CURRENT MBf$ NOMINATION Im COUNCIL 3 John Hardinger 1992-94 Perry 4 David Martin 1992-94 Cott 1 Robert Hicks Robert Hicks 1992-94 Chew k -mot w f 4 f l 5 ~dkI0aIV0 opoa `.e S will HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TE$M COUNCIL 3 Kenneth Morgan Kenneth Morgan 1992-94 Perry 7 Judy Cole Judy Cole _ 1992-94 Mayor 2 Mary McCain 1992-94 Smith i t P HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 6 Jim Bezdek Pat Muro 1992-94 Brock 7 Lawrence Cochran 1992-94 Mayor. 2 Terry Garrett 1992-94 Smith 4 Sandy Kristofersen 1992-94 Cott { KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD I I DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION jI,$a COUNCIL 1 Dave Boston 1992-94 Chew f E 6 Gertrude Gibson Luanne Hicks 1992-94 Brock 7 Betty Kimble 1992-94 Mayor 3 Kandice Gand91 Kardice Gandel 1992-94 Perry 4 Bill Watson _ 1992-94 Cott LIBRARY BOARD I DLST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TF.LM COUNCIL 7 Kjell Johansen Klell Johansen 1992-94 Mayor 3 Kathy Pole Kathy Pole 1992-94 Perry j 4 Jean Schaake 1992-94 Cott v r~~ i J S +ge~daNa ~c~2 4gendaltan~ 3 Dace 7-/9 PARRS AND RECREATION BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATLOH ICBM C CIL 7 Tom Judd Tom Judd 1992-94 Mayor 2 Loyce Wilson Loyce Wilson 1992-94 Smith ELANNINO AND SONING coxHraa mx DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 3 Mike Cochran Mike Cochran _ 1992-94 Perry 5 Jim Engelbrecht Ellen Schertz _ 1992-94 Miller 6 Katie Flemming Katie Flemming - 1992-94 Brock PLUMBING AND MEC ~*~ICAL C9D8 BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION COUNCIL 5 Millard Heath Hillard Heath 1992-94 Miller 6 Lee Capps Lee Capps 1992-94 Brock 1 Jett Peplos _ Jeff Peoloe 1992-94 Chew PUBLIC UTILITIEA Bo an DIST CURRENT M U= i r_ NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 6 Roland Laney George Hopkins 1990-34 Brock DION BOARD OF APPRsr.a DI:.T QUEENT MEMBER NOMINATION TFBI~ COUNCIL i i Harry Eaddy 1992-94 Chew 3 Ann Houston (ALT) _ 1992-94 Perry 7 Mike Wiebe Mike Wiebe 1992-94 Mayor 1 t w C VndaNo 2 4gendahArn 0810- PARKS S&7/G _AND RECRZ~►TION BOARD % DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION Tim S.OUNCIL 7 Tom Judd Tom Judd 1992-94 Mayor 2 Loyce Wilson Loyce Wiisun 1992-94 Smith PLMING M SONING eoNraarON AIST CURRENT MEMB.K NOMINATION TERMJNCIL 3 Mike Cochran Mike Cochran 1992-94 Perry 5 Jim Engelbrecht Ellen Schertz 1992-94 Miller 6 Katie Flemming - Katie Flemming 1992-94 Brock PLUMBING AND NEC UicAL• CODE BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER xPliIHATION IEBM COUNCIL 5 Millard Heath Millard Heath 1991-94 Miller 6 Lee Capps Lee Capps 1992-94 Brock 1 Jeff Peploe Jeff ?00100 1992-94 Chew PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION Um COUNCIL 6 Roland Laney _ George Hopkins 1990-94 Brock SIGN BOARD OF RPP ALIT DIST CURRENT MEMUR NOMINATION I= COUNCIL } 1 Harry Eaddy 1992-94 Chew 3 Ann Houston (ALT) 1992-94 Perry 7 Mike Wiebe Mike Wiebe 1992-94 Mayor i II gendaNo q to 3 ~gendahe ~ TRAFPIC SAFETY COMMISSION DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TE$M COUNCIL 6 VACANT 1992-94 Brock 1 Kathy Devine Kathy Devine 1992-94 Chew 2 Eric Jackson Eric Jackson 1992-94 Smith 3 George Kay 1992-94 Perry 4 Edna Redmon 1992-94 Cott CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION $EAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM 3 Charldean Newell Charldean Newell 1991-94 Harrell DENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION 1 Derrell Bulls 1992-94 Mayor 2 Rudy Rodriguez 1992-94 Mayor f I I TMPA BOARD OF DIRECTORS { DEBT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION IE 1 Tom Harpool Tom Harpool 1992-94 Council i i ACCO0128 f CITY COUNCI a or o~ t1 kf ~ O 6 s O 0 ;ro M 16 AIPWO W t, I 'i D CITY of DENTOIV, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM { } DATE: July 14, 1994 I i TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Kathy DuBose, Acting Executive Director of Finance SUBJECT: SCIENCE LAND'S REQUEST TO RECEIVE HOTEL/MOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE i Attached is a copy of a letter received from Dalton Gregory, President of the Board of Directors of Science Land•Denton's Discover Museum located at the Golden Triangle Mall, requesting access to hotel/motel occupancy tax revenue. Although he is requesting a future annual allocation of these funds, Science Lend is ire dire need of immediate financial assistance and he indicated that it would be possible for them to maintain their operations with $1,000 per month until the City Council was prepared to negotiate the contracts of all the recipients of the hotellmotel occupancy tax revenue. i i Several years ago, when the Greater Denton Arts Council's building contract expired ! (1% of the 7% overall rate), the GDAC requested the use of a portion of that allocation to fund the Campus Theater renovation. Because state law mandates that i only 1% of the hotel/motel occupancy tax rate may be used for "the arts" and an ! additional 1 % was already allocated for GDAC operations, another approach was necessary. The City Council identified eligible City expenses which met the criteria for hotel/motel occupancy tax funding and in turn allocated General Fund revenue for f the Campus T oeatre. At that some time, the Council established a Hotel/Motel Occupancy Tax Reserve fund to accumula a the balance of the amount previously allocated to the GDAC building fund (less the Civic Center expenses) and those funds relieved by diminishing allocation clauses in other Lalor fund recipient's contracts (from I % to .95%). That reserve may be used for any Council approved project that meets the criteria for use of hotel/motel occupancy tax. 8171666.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2629 4.a UY~ r F tr (y 9 ~ellde10 ApeAtlAl I Memo to Lloyd V. Harrell July 14, 1994 d &6 y Page 2 Currently, we estimate that by the end of the 1993-94 fiscal year, approximately $145,000 will have been accumulated in the hotel/motel occupancy tax reserve fund The proposed 1994-95 budget utilizes $124,180 of that reserve to replace the Civic Center roof. We estimate that approximately $20,820 in the reserve fund will be undesignated by the end of the current fiscal year. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. I ~o:►t AtwNnent }ti AFFOOAAA i pi i , , 5f~ i e M r Agertdalt7 41 Oale June 9, 1994 r Mr. Harlan Jefferson Director of Treasury Operations OF oENTON City Denton Golden Triangle Mail 215 E E, . McKinney ' p,p. Box 1338 Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, TX 7620 817-383-8686 Dear Mr. Jefferson: This letter is to seek access to revenue collected by the City of Denton through the Hotel / Motel tax. We believe that we should quality for these funds since the museum generates tourist traffic from surrounding counties. I know that our vice president, Sandy Krlstoferson, has spoken with you about this money over the past 14 months. Even though the city is planning to implement new procedures to apply for the money, we would like to have access now to the one cent currently undesignated for any specific group or purpose. Science Land - Denton's Discovery Museum Is a community supported non-profit endeavor that seeks to encourage teaming through dynam, chartered won the Texas activities designed to stimulate creative inquiry. ~f are Secretary of State as Denton Children's Museum, inc. and recognized by the internal Revenue Service as a publicly supported organization eligible to receive tax deductible contributions under section 501 (c) (3) of the tax code. The museum is an associate member of the Association of Science-Technology Centers. Science Land had a successful first year operating in a retail space in Golden Triangle Mail in Denton, Texas. The museum opened Its doors November 27, 1992. Over 17,800 people have visitod the museum for workshops, birthday parties, family night programs, and the many hands-on interactive exhlbits that peak curiosity and generate fun. The museum Is supported by area businesses and corporations such as First State Bank of Texas, Denton Regional Medical Center, Golden friangle Mall Associated, HCA Community Hospital, Thomas Furniture, The City of Denton Municipal Utilities, Safety Clean Corporation, and Boeing Corporation. The museum has recen'ly received a Venture Grant from the United Way of Denton County to work with . The grant will fund a program economically to prromote science amongDenton schools underprivileged children. , 1 l ~pertdaN~ ~-q,28 AgEndalt~rt,,~Qs.n~/9 page 2 State .2 yof'4 Science Land is growing every month. We serve children, families, scout groups, YMCAs, youth groups, private and public schools in Denton, Dallas, Collin, Cooke, Wise, and Tarrant counties. Professors from both Texas Woman's University and The University of North Texas have us~G the museum as an example for creating quality educational experiences for their education majors. Other community groups now meet in tha museum classroom. Denton's Discovery Museum Is quickly becoming cssociated with quality educational experiences, quality family experiences, and a warm friendly environment. Please let me know what steps are necessary for our museum to gain access to funds from the Hotel ! Motel tax. I appreciate your assistance. t S' rely to Gregory President, Board of Directors i E I ;?J 1 f i y~ , WC ITY~ COUNCI i l ~ O ` t 4 O ~ t • ~ Y'K y~y l d*~ f A DATE: July 19, 1994 ~8f16aH0 ~emia~tem CITY COUNCIL REPORT kilt TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Rezoning 5.5638 acres from C to MF-1 RECOMMENDATION: See attached report. SUMMARY: See attached report. BACKGROUND: I See attached report. PROGRAMS. DEPARTM 'NTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED. None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Respectfully submitted: Prepared by: L1 yd V. Harrell, City anager ' L u G. Owen Yost, an Planner I f Approved: art H. Rob ins, AICP Executive D ector Planning an Development Al DW3 In 1 I J 1 t a r r r QendaNo ' Vendal(e S ate -9 Pia REPORT (I Tot Mayor and members of the City Council Case No.: Z-94-014 meeting Datei July le 1994 r GENERAL INPORMATION 1 Applicanti Fairfax Partners, Ltd. 1600 Two Lincoln Center 5420 LBJ Freeway Dallas, TX 75240 i Current Owners Prairie Hollow Partners, Inc, Requested Action: Rezone (I'downzone't) an existing apartment I complex from a familcommercial (C) district to y (MF-1) district. Location and eiset The 5.5638 acre site is located directly north of Prairie St. and east of Interstate 35. Surrounding Land Use and Eonings North - EMC Plastics on commercial (C) zoned land, South - Undeveloped land, zoned C. East - Texas Department of Transportation, on multi- family (MF-1) land. West - Right-of-way of Interstate 35. Denton nevelopment plans Moderate Intensitys Area No. 117 (50% allocated). 4 s r f: s 9y-Q COMM Apenda!tem date 7- SPECIALINFORMATION Transportations l/ No additional impact. Otilitiese No additional impact. ! Drainage: No additional impact. e I I 3 HISTORY _ The land has been in a commercial (C) district since 1960. The apartments were built on commercial land under cumulative zoning. NOTIFICATION Six notices were mailed to property owners within 200 ft. At this writing, two written. replies have been receivadi one undecided regarding the proposal and one in favor. A phone caller who was initially opposed is interpreted now as "undecided". ANALYSIS i This downzo:zing represents a reduction in intensity for the site, and an increase of 1103.11 available intensity trips for the study area. RECONI:ENDATION The Commission recommends approval in light of the fact that the Prairie Hollow Apartments currently exist, and there will be a reduction in the study area's intensity 1 allocation. i k ALTERNATIVES _ 1. Approve application. 2. Deny application. 3. Postpone consideration. „ i =ti ~ f ra - - - r I F • 4 +gendaNoQs~ 4gendalt Hale ATTACH"NTA__ 1. Location map. 2. Zoning map, part. 3. PSZ minutes. AUDD604 I I i 's e F 8} I p ~~J{ D i t i Q k i i 1 f y ~gendaNo 9 ATTACHMENT 1 Agandall S Z-94.014 Prairie Hollow Apartments °B18 ~s~ » NORTH 1f1fI 1 ' L 11-J! 'C s ~j I, +y E 1 ` W lR E J C \ aC CAOCX. \ ®N ,CC=EI • = L C SITE m,, r ® ; C~A t a ~~lJ~ EsQCI 1111 a a ®I~JQE RR /rur~~~l ~~ara' ml o ( I TA l0 M~AiI ~~,r-~ L 31~ l I !~I Y1` A.e ~ Location Map Date: 6/9/94 Scale: None ATTACHMENT 2 ~gerEdalu~-4gentlaltem Oale -r Z-94.014 Prairie Hollow Apartments 6 I/ e wy. 360 1;, rrrrrrrr r~ •rrrrrr 1.rrrrrr rrrrrrr L"}r~11-U GR ur r, ~ W t1~ ~ N A $ DE IWDEN ~ C i t♦ U rGR ` 1 5 I l l/~, 7 u- irrr O r ; ~F~ 1 i 1 1 PD-69 1 2F W. OAK rr Jrrrrr OAK Irr r u % 1 \ IL i e SITE 1 % % 1 Ll . 1 ~ rrrrrrrrrr 1 , . + rrrrrrrJ Zoning Exhibit E Dale: 6117/94 Scale: None $enda No ATTACHMENT 3 4gendaltem 5 rbte 7- 159etl Minutes PiZ Commission June 22, 1994 `"UU Page 34 Mr. Norton: That explains it. Thank you. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any questions for staff or a motion? Mr. Norton: Do you foresee any problems with the contour- ing? Mr. Yo[t: It passed DRC approval. Dr. Huey: Is this an improvement over the other plan? Mr. Salmon: It will accomplish the same thing. Dr. Huey: Will we be hearing from the railroad on that? Mr. Salmon: I don't think so. Dr. Huey: I move for approval of the preliminary replat of Lot 4F, Block A, Section II of freeway park addition. Mr. Norton: I second. Mr. Engelbrecht: It has been moved and seconded to recommend approval. Is there any discussion on the motion? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). VI. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning 5.5638 acres to a multi-family 1 (MF-1) zoning district, from a commer- cial (C) district. The site known as the Prairie Hollow Apartments is located north of Prairie Street and east of I Interstate 35. staff report given by Owen Yost. This is downzoning of an area now zoned C. It was allowed to build apartments in C zoning 10-20 years ago. At that time we had cumulative zoning. Now, we have pretty much backed off of that. Apartments now are not allowed in commercial zoning. The applicant is requesting multi- family 1 zoning, it is in a moderate intensity now that is Only 50% allocated. Six notice wero mailed, one was opposed. After talking with the applicant on the bale- phone, the applicant was undecided. TherA was one reply in favor. The downzoning does represent a reduction in the intensity and an increase in available intensity of approximately 2500 intensity trips for the study area. That is based on allocating 650 trips to 2n apartment in commercial zoning but under MF1 zoning it would be based ai ~gendaNe y'©~c~~ 4gendalt lea riate y- /9- 9y Minutes P&Z Commission RAF June 22, 1994 II II Page ) 5 upon 200 trips per acre. The staff, in light of the fact that there is a reduction in intensity and the apartment already exists, does recommend approval. Mr. Engelbrecht: Questions for staff? Is there a petitioner or petitioners representative present? Duke Stone: I am representing Paul Jost. This is not unlike a lot of things we see in Dallas. We just want to be a conforming use based on the structures that are there. Mr. Engelbrecht: Questions for the petitioner? The public hearing is closed. Mr. Cochran: I move to approve Z-94-014.. Mrs. Russell: I second the motion. L0) ngelbrecht: It has been moved and recommend approval 94-014. All in favor? Motion carries unanimously . . VII. Hold a public hearing and consider making a, recommendation to the City Council to amend the regulatory line map so as to include the area located east of FM 2164 in the vicin- ity of FM 2153 in Division I of the ETJ and therefore apply the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations in this area. J Staff Report given by Frank Robbins. Simply stated, this is now in the cities extra-territorial jurisdiction. It was annexed after your, recommendation about three weeks ago. We were requesting that we move this area in which we would apply our subdivision and landuse regulations. This is part of a briefing we made to the council and for which there were a number of public hearing held. Fundamentally this area is an area in which the city has authority to provide water and wastewater service. We feel that the subdivision regulations are appropriate. Mr. Engelbrecht: The city is the petitioner. Is there anyone present who would like to speak in,favor of or in opposition of the petition. The public hearing is closed. ,l 3 I pre1rhal.ord igendaNo S" agendalte date ORDINANCE NO. MULTI-FAMILY rTEXAS, (MF PROVIDIZONING DISTRICT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY FROM COMMERCIAL (C) TO CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR A 5.5638 ACRE TRACT OF LAN LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PRAIRIIr STREET, EAST OF RRSST000 HIGHWAY 35; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Fairfax Partners, Ltd. has applied for a change to to zoning for a 5.5638 acre tract of land from Commercial (C) Multi-Family One (MF-1); and WHEREAS, on Jun4 r9equthe ested Planning change in zoning Candission recommended approval of the r ge WHEREAS, the city Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: i aFCT10N i. That the zoning district classification and use ' designation of the 5.5638 acre tract of land described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated in to M lti-Family Ona (MFe1) ence, is changed from Commercial (C) zoning district classification and use deesignatio Texas, the com- Of Deno prehensive zoning ordinance of the City SRCTION Ii. That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. That any person violating any provision of this esnce IIT. ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. That this ordinance shall become effective four- cadate useothet passage, ofathish ordiinancertoahe i$ eh y ~d ecfrom ted to the days l of news- pofd htwice in e City ofeDent n RTexas, cwithinltent (o10)fficia paper date of its passage. day of __j 1994. PASSED AND APPROVED this the BOB CASTLEBERRY? MAYOR { Benda No 3 4gendaSts 5 pate /0 tie ii ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: r DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: r I i i I Ul i I i I I i `t 7 ~ u i s PAGE 2 I wi' r ; I I ' r s J +gandaNo b0a,1daite s oete _ 7' EXHIBIT A I I TRACT I LOT 2, BLOCK 1, OF HILL RUN APARTMENTS PHASE 11, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING 10 TH£ P.AT THEREOF RECORDED IN CABINET D, PAGE 309, OF THC P-AT RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTf, TEXAS. TRACT 11 LOT 1, OF HILL RUN APARTMENTS, AN ADDITIC14 TO THE C1'f OF DENTON, } DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED I11 CABINET D. PAGE 110, OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF DENTON COUNT(, TEXAS. 4 11 i r \~.J I I I j I le '1 M _ CITY COUNCI: i I i 0' DD ` MrOO 9 s e ~ tiro 0 ~p~daNa -G~3 CITY COUNCIL REPORT AQiAd3~tA Date DATE: July 19, 1994 Jp~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Codeanof Ordinances,34pertaining n to Appendix street grades in Southridge Estates, Phase I $FCOMMFND The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval at its July 13, 1994 public hearing, by a vote of 6-0. $ This petition submitted by Trendmaker Homes for Southridge Estates, Phase I is to request a variance of Section 34- 114(9)d and Appendix A-1 of the City of Denton Code of Ordinances. Section 34-114(9)d requires that at the approach of an intersection there must be an area sets a maximum street at a grade of 2% or less. Appendix Al e grade of 7%. The petitioner is proposing to reduce the 60 foot approach grade to 30 feet at 2% slope and has requested street grades as high as 9%. This will affect about three locations in the proposed subdivision. The purpose of the 2% approach grade is to provide a relatively level approach to intersections providing adequate site distance and a safe place to stop without the risk of sliding in wet or icy weather. The 7% maximum street grade also provides a grade that is safe and relatively easy to maneuver in adverse weather conditions. maydgrant ea accordance 4 of the Code (variances and Modifications), the City Council of variance of all of the following criteria have been met: 1. as Granting defined by request Section 34 5 of thelSubdivision t and plans Development Regulations. est 2. The special or peculiar conditions shape, which other unique is based relate to the topography, or physical features of the property which are not generally common to other properties. 3. The special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is based did not result from or was not created by the owner's or any prior owner's omission. Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this based affect n unique variance. Granting r plans. The request have is no the City's maste que I J 9 i I ~fI 1 topography within the subdivision. Some of the existing ground slopes are in excess of 124 and areas especially toward Lillian Miller Parkway are heavily wooded. In order to meet grade requirements, a large amount of additional fill would be required thus requiring the removal of more trees. One other factor in the case of the intersection of Lillian Miller and Southridge Drive, the location and grades are somewhat fixed due to the existing intersection. None of these physical circumstances were created by the owner. BACKGR0 .ND: The 43.792 acre tract is located on Lillian Miller Parkway at Southridge Drive and is currently vacant. The preliminary plat, approved by the City Council on May 3, 1994, contained 136 single family detached residential lots. The development is designed with two access points to Lillian Miller Parkway. The minimum lot size is 9,000 square feet with minimum widths and depths of 65' and 105' respectively. The variance applies to Phase I which contains 20.034 acres and is adjacent to Lillian Miller Parkway. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OP GROUPS AFFECTED: Property owner FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Plat Indicating Variance Locations 1 Respectfu ly submitted: Lloyd. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: bra Goodwin Urban Planner Approved: ~0 rank H. Rob ins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development A~PNO 3 oete¢a~ `Qy 06 9 J X E } ~pendaNo 9q ATTACH EN 1 4~eodafter►12~S Southridge Estates (Treadmaker) 3ole9 I.H. 35E I - <y I 3SF ~0~ oQ 0 ~P JP a~ y i TEASLET LANE LOCATION PROJECT MAP SITE ~ N. T. S. t G M6NV 'Q nrtn~r[rl ~r ~w.. 1. s.. / `ATTA r I t.%w 1' b' b5'• r 11 a .v / L/ / 0 ■Irlf I •ul A 4104Il n • r- 1811 w r 1 . 0^IY d' f7 1 a.1c.• lf1 7CMf 1 ~ .rte=! ! { r, w o.11R r0.. 34tt. ►0. OODt f / - I j / Lvr I Ianlt tolrt it ► i1 . -r,r." --'S- ! Ir • 1 12 L . lR , r .l~ ♦ 1 YYYy n 4 p • ti r• 01 O.f V1 IT I / r! 11 1 'i, w 10 OJECY 11: 1 n~ . 6 r l I~ aTE g I F s ~ +~6~ ! 9 I RACY I 1.11 AM$ , ry • .r 1 V ! I.t R VOL 3451. PG D00, + i ~ f IIY•r t / (D.ID C.1.) 7 1~ 1 5 ` 11 \ I f+ Ire tt\ 7 ~ \ r LR•we ro.wC ro-If I ~fJ. 'I 1~ A. ~Ir + f , r ~ iD0 I . t1 A , IS ,rr ,rr 14 SPIN 7 ♦ ' *,P D 11 {.1170' r / • ~ ~ I ~ i ' 1 o.rr' 1 ( ' t " O I L t 7r71vf t ~ ` } . 7 r1~ ~nr K ~ .11 ^ - " may` 76M 70rV. ' 6 .1r_ .JI. f O if 1•Iwo \ r q • !n`r two- .w L. i7 'i~h p A, t r• YY9 65'h r y(/l4DD/J1 ~V 11 f1= 6 1 '.Y IMTN'r ~j s • -1r~ ` It • ,r 1 f 0 Irw.r. 1 f 5 '{I 61 E5 a 65 11 63 j 'acs.. w:. ..6P.,, ~ • !F- - - - 1 ^ 61r17ltf1 r 1 YMC.rAl .Y'S Y \ r.{1.K'. IG IOl"1 • r♦ '00 IN lt:"J. 1'a'•• 1.1ir[r rC191AN L([ 453. P, C01►DII Dal ,0. v.n f•C •"f K 1,7 VOL 3467, PD !nl . r 0 A. * i ~r is + Wti rprpl YR..P 1. 6 1111 Alt tnttntKO n • haw r~yrr • f ~ pti.o.r w w mm~ . 1 . < +w Lw ARY no / A IWAWK0 AT r4gftEIVEI ~I I VYrI«, r i^ pmn. lrn,o, naA r6 f 111 6 1K tr6nrlR1 IT . plAwrd r10 A& 01 W4 - i -t - - - ,,.un ar+o" r nsr lnr.^• „ rlw OrllR Mt{ue./KlIrOYf 10'YOl .04 _ fwt.e.LL ■q1R 61~H AT t Vag+atnt2 A r-1 C4. cpae4aso 914 Date q , 1 a i AgeoOaitem'? .qc Minutes P&Z Commission 549 July 13, 1994 11aFT Page 20 Staff report by Mr. Robbins. This is the replat. The only public improvements required by our subdivision Regulations are sidewalks along McKinney. The council approved the preliminary plat on July 5. The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The Development Review Commit- tee recommends approval. Mr. Engelbrecht: Is the petitioner or the petitioners representative present? Is there anyone present who would like to speak in favor of this petition? Is there anyone present who would like to speak in opposition to this peti- tion? The public hearing closed. Mr. Cochran: I move approval of the final replat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block A, of the 3-1 Addition. Mr. Norton: I second. i Mr. Engelbrecht: Any discussion on the motion? All in favor? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). VII. Hold a public hearing and consider variances to Section 34-114(9)d and Appendix A-1 pertaining to maximum grades E at street intersections and on local/residential streets for Southridge Estates, Phase I. This 20.034 acre tract is located on Lillian Miller Parkway at Southridge Drive. { Staff report by David Salmon: This petition is submitted by Trendmaker homes, the developers and owners of the Southridge Estates subdivision. They are asking for a variance to Section 34-114, Article D, Appendix A-1. Article D requires that at the approach of an intersect- ion you must have a minimum of a 60 foot length of grade not more than 24. Appendix A-1 sets the maximum street grade on any street in the city at 74. The petitioner is proposing to reduce the 60 foot approach length to 30 feet and is request- ing some street grades as high as 9%. We like to have a relatively level street grade at an inter- section for adequate sight distance and also during inclement weather you don't have a problem with cars sliding. If you get steeper than 7% you have a problem with cars sliding on icy and wet weather. They are proposing a 30 foot flat section at intersection as opposed to 60 foot with grades up E V jgvdaNo ITL . 4gendal%M oaten: /9 c? Minutes piz Commission July 13, 1994 Page 21 to 94. Just as an example of places with grades more than 74, the woodlands of Township II. There is one that is 91 and two streets that are 84 in that particular subdivision. Those streets are in the range of 8-9 t. I had someone go out and measure the slope on Oak St. east of the square. That grade is about 7.74. In accordance with Section 34-7 of the code of ordinances, variance may be recommended if 3 criteria are met. The first is it cannot violate any master plan of the city. Second, it is based on some unusual shape or topography of the property. The third is if there is such an unusual condition, that it was not caused by the owner. Staff is recommending approval of this variance with the previously mentioned conditions, 30 length on the straight grade and maximum 94 grade on the other areas. The reason we are recommending approval is some of the ground slopes are greater than 124. Another reason is the fact that this intersection of South- ridge Drive and Lillian Miller is already set. They are pretty well locked into intersecting at that location. The amount of trees in this area, most are up close to Lillian Miller. A lot of trees have been removed due to construction of waterlines,, GTE, and other subdivisions, in order to meet our maximum grades, there would have to be a tremendous amount 3 of fill in this area and would cause more trees to be cut down. t Mr. Cooper: Which direction is the slope on each of the areas. ~J t s Mr. Salmon: It is going down. Dr. Huey: Why is the developer obliged to follow Southridga drive? Mr. Salmon: They are required to have at least two entrances I and they have to be at least 400 feet apart, it doesn't leave a lot of room to put two different approaches. The more I look at this, there would be no way to have two entrances and i still be 400 feet away from the existing Southridge Drive. #E There is already an existing median opening there. Mr. Cochran: Is the icing street situation the only problem I with having the slope greater than 2 4? I Mr. Salmon: There are two concerns, one is weather and the other is eight distance. i Mr. Cochran: In your opinion is thirty feet adequate? Mr. Salmon: Yes. ~gendaNo q~~ 4gendalta 'S late ' Minutes PAZ Commission 74ct July 13, 1994 Page 22 Mr. Cochran: So you could have 4-5 cars backed up. Mr. 3almon: Probably more like 3 cars comfortably without being on the head of the steep slope. Mr. Engelbrecht: Is the petitioner or the petitioners representative present? Don Allen: I am with Trendmaker Homes 5757 Alpha Rd. Dallas, Tx. In the final design of the subdivision plans for this property we encountered some very steep severe topography on the sight. our engineer has worked well with staff to examine each of these cases and come up with what we feel are a reasonable compromises for each situation. We are held by the intersection of Lillian Miller and Southridge drive. our other entrance is also occupied by a median opening. They are greater than the subdivision standards. They are within ASHTO recommendations for local street. These grades are common in Austin and San Antonio. I would be happy to answer any other questions. Mr. Engelbrecht: Is there anyone present who would like to speak in favor of this petition? Is there anyone present who would like to speak in opposition to this petition? i j Jerry Cott: May I discuss this? f Jerry Drake: Are you wanting to address this as a citizen? I don't think there is a problem with that as long as you are not here on your official capavity. Jerry Cott: Yes, as a citizen. I reside at the Sundown Ranch. I am a member of the Denton City Council ( I want to put that on the tape). My main concern is drainage. That piece of land is 45% flood plain. We have no float plain in almost 200 acres. I am afraid that is going to come into either my front door or increase my flood plain. I would like that addressed before this is approved. Mr. Engelbrecht: Questions for Mr. Cott? is there anyone else present who would like to speak in opposition to this petition? Mr. Allen: I am a little surprised by Mr. Cott's response at this time. Those issues are obviously part of the preliminary plat process. Our property is not 45% flood plain. Maybe I misunderstood his comments. Our street grades and the things we are asking for in this variance really are not drainage oriented. I i i 4 ~gend&No -19 sq_ Agenda;le S Oate Minutes PAZ Commission July 13, 1994 Page 23 Hr. Engelbrecht: In terms of the property outline, do you own additional property? 40% of our property. Mr. Allen: Yes, his Is about further to the front east. our property extends Mr. Engelbrecht: Was that part of the preliminary plat? Mr. Allen: Yes. Mr. Engelbrecht: How much of this is flood plain area? Mr. Allen: Actually, there is no mapped flood plain or flood way on our property other than a little portion in the southwest corner. The property to the south of us does have some flood plain on it. We do have a drainage way that comes through our property from Phase. portion down along the north property line of this Mr. Engelbrecht: Public hearing is closed. eite Mr. platting Salmon: the idewould veloperlike isoreassure you sponsible ttot bt in nofffinal F permission from any adjacent property owners to increase run- off. That is the opportunity that the off-site owner has to try and re-coop any foreseen damages or work out some type of arrangement with the developer. I understand that Trendmaker As far is making arrangement with Jake Hersman at this time. as the variance goes staff does recommend it with conditions i that the approach grades are 30 feet long as.oppo and the maximum street grade be 94. s Mr. Engelbrecht: No matter how you do it, it has be to meet city specifications. A portion is going to drain onto Mr. Hr. Salton: Yes. Hersman's property where the private park is, and Trendmak_or 4 homes is currently working with Mr. Hersman to obtain their written permission to drain. Mr. Engelbrecht: Do we have any requirements to slopes on driveways in single family residents? Mr. Salmon: We try not to have more than a 124 slope. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any comments or a motion? Mr. Norton: I move that we approve the street grade variances for Southridge Estates as presented. r k i ~endaNa. r ~ 5 A endallem reIe Minutes Psz Commission 9a~ July 13, 1994 Pa a 24 Mrs. Russell: I second. Mr. Cochran: F just want to say that streets with slopes like that make interesting neighborhoods. The regulation sort of imposes some blandness. Mr. Engelbrecht: All in favor of the motion? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). VIII. Hold a public hearing to consider the preliminary plat of approximately 24.43 acres of unplatted land into Lots 1-7 of Block A, Lots 3-34 of Block B, Lots 1-22 of Block C and Lots 1-13 of Block D of the Crown Oaks addition, located north an3 east of Teasley Lane, roughly between sandpiper and Pennsylvania Drives. Simultaneously consider the preliminary replat of Lots 16-18, Block C, Timber Oaks ` Addition into Lots 16R and 18R. t Staff report given by Owen Yost: This is the Crown Oaks Subdivision that yon: talked about before, in relation to the intersection spacing. This subdivision is planned for approximately 75 single family lots. It is currently zoned SF10. None of these lots will have direct driveway access to Teasley Lane. The area that we are replatting is what was three lots at the north west, that will be replatted into two lots plus the street which at that point is named Skylark or Abbotts. I am not sure at that point what they are going to name the street. The public improvements which are associated with the final replat of this area include the pavement of the interior streets (Abbotts Lane, Hope street, Chapel Drive, and Providence Street), concrete sidewalks, water lines, fire hydrants, sewer lines, street lights, and drainage improvements as shown. The { primary drainage improvement on site is the right of way 9 shown. That right of way will be dedicated for drainage, utility, and sidewalk uses. The purpose behind having that be a right of way rather than an easement is so that the adjacent owners will not be motivated to put a fence in that area. I would like to make one small change in the recommendation of the Development Review Committee: The regulations of City of Denton be amended as we heard earlier, allowing the intersec- tion spacing that is shown. If this is approved, it will be forwarded to the council with your recommendation. Mr. Engelbrecht: Is the patitioner or the petitioners representative present? r. a a --=C ITY~ : -.COUNCI of o't 4 ~ G t a 0 e ~ ♦ 4~ ^J eto ~ GC~~oo i 4. i M COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT To; Mayor and Members of the City Council From; Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Subject: ANNNGBANHEARING RAAAND RIILYO ZON NG AF OF 79.691 ACRES LOCATED ALONG FM 2164 AND EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 3,482 FEET NORTH OF BOBCAT ROAD. RECOMMENDATLON: The Planning and Zoning Coll mission recommends approval.(6 - 0) sum An ordinance annexing and temporarily zoning 79.69 acres located along FM 2164 and extending approximately 3,482 feet north of Bobcat Road is attached. (See nt #1) Exhibit "A" of the ordinance contains the attachme legal d for the tract to be annexed. The Service Plan included in exhibit "B" provides The Ordinance als pro extension of full muni ipal tract t CeAgr►culture °A" zoning distract classificat ones for temporary zoning of he The current city limits on Bobcat Road was established by Ordinance #74.36 dated September 3, 1974. The proposed annexation will move the city limits 3,482 feet j North of Bobcat Road on FM 2164. s 11ACKc'R-- OU1Q1 The proposed annexation and temporv;+ zoning of this tract has been initiated the the City in order to expand the extraterritorial jurisdiction to include most of thhe area South of FM 2153. City Council held a discussion with regard to the proposed annexation on Apri119,1994 .and appro led an annexation schedule. The first and second public hearings were held before the city Council on May 3, and May 17, fts Mrs. S Dna on g°tlives outsi of the onnmission coruideredetherproposed 1994. On both occaspl in opposition. The annexation and temporary zoning of the tract on May 25, 1994 and unanimously recommended adoption. On June 7, 1994 City Councilheld a public hearing and considered an ordinance proposing to annex and zone the subject tract. The ordinance was published in the Denton Record Chronicle on rune 10, 1994. i gendaNo. 9 aoendalte ~ ate . S PROGRAMS DEpaa t~utF.tlt S OR GROUP Ag LGrED All city service departments; including Utilities, Engineering, Planning and Development, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, Environmental Health, Parks and Recreation, and Library. FISCAL IMPACT: The annexation and ultimate development of this tract will expand the city's tax base. Res ly submitted: w { ~v x Lloyd V. [carrell 1 City Manager x F 4 Prepared by: Harry N. Persaud, MRTPI, AICP Senior Planner i Approved: a i i Frank H. Robbins, AI Executive Director for planning and Development Attachment #1: Ordinance Attachment #2: P & 2 minutes Attachment #3: Site reap j a6571994 a .l j Y. f r Q gandaNo 9 ~aandalta war `:4/ 2dK /I1 FnW vAMS nr ueATMFbE nR 9ROUPS AUE91ED: All city service departments; including Utilities, Engineering, Planning end Development, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, Environmental Health, Parks and Recreation, and Library. FISCAL. IMPACT: The annexation and ultimate development of this tract will expand the city's tax base. tted: : ZlRespely~ ssubmi Y Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager e; Prepared by. Harry N. Persaud, MRTPI, AICP J Senior Planner `a 4V,k oved: 4L H. Robbins, Al i Executive Director for Planning and Development Attachment #1: Ordinance Attachment #2: P & Z minutes Attachment 413: Site map ab571994 1 s. ~a Y J8\WPD0CS\0AD\A650RD AOendoNo_ qy-D~_ Apesida~t S 7- / - 9 ATTACHMENT 1 oats ORDINANCE NO. f AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ANNEXING 79.69 ACRES OF 1111 LAND LOCATED ALONG FM 2164 AND EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 3,482 FEET NORTH OF BOBCAT ROAD AND INCLUDING 450 FEET ON THE WEST SIDE AND 550 FEET ON THE EAST SIDE OF FM 2164; APPROVING A SERVICE PLAN FOR THE ANNEXED PROPERTY; APPROVING A TEMPORARY AGRICULTURE (A) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE ANNEXED PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND DECLK(ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton wishes to extend its extra- territorial jurisdiction to include the area South of FM 2153 and East of FM 2164; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held in the Council Chambers on May 3, 1994, and May 17, 1994, (both days being on or after the 40th day but before the 20th day before the date of institution of the proceedings) to allow all interested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon this annexation; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning commission unanimously recommended approval of this annexation on May 25, 1994; and WHEREAS, annexation proceedings were instituted for the property described herein by the introduction of this ordinance at a meeting of the City Council on June 7, 1994; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full one time in the official newspaper of the City of Dentin after annexation j proceedings were instituted and 30 days prior to City Council t taking final action, as required by City Charter; NOW THEREFORE, 9 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSi i SECTION 2: That the tract of land described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is annexed to the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION ILs That the service plan attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by reference, which provides for municipal services to the annexed property, is approved as s on of 3 this ordi p pa rt of Hance. I SECTION IIi~ hat the property annexed is temporarily zoned for Agriculture "A" district classification and use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas. SECTION iyr That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the zoning district classification of the property annexed. 3. ,F ~endaNo X13,_... Ape~dalt 5C Date 7-! 9- y~ly SECTION y: Should any part of this ordinance be held illegal for any reason, the holding shall not affect the remaining portion of this ordinance and the City Council hereby declares it to be itu purpose to annex to the City of Denton all the real property described in Exhibit "A" regardless of whether any other part of the described property is hereby effectively annexed to the City. If any part of the real property annexed is already included within the city limits of the City of Denton or within the limits of any other city, town or village, or is not within the City of Denton's jurisdiction to annex, the same is hereby excluded from the territory annexed as fully as if the excluded area were expressly described in this ordinance. SECTION VI:_ That any person violating any provision of this s ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION VII: That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City i Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record Chronicle, the official ' newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the t date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS; CITY SECRETARY BY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY r BY: PAGES 2 7. :.pia` 1. k, ape+~laNo y- 2 Apendalt ~ EXHIBIT 'A' ~tA 5y BEING a tract of land 1000.0 feet wide located in the M. Langston Survey A-737, the M. Johnston Survey A-681, the J. Burn Survey A- 130 and the S. elish Survey A-40 Denton County, Texas and also being located 450 feet on the west side of the centerline of FM Highway 2164 and 550 feet on the east side of FM 2164 and containing 79.697 acres of land. The centerline of FM 2164 that is included within the 79.697 acre tract is further described as followal BEGINNING at a point in the existing city limits, as established by city ordinance No. 74-36, Tract 3, said point lying in the south line of the W. Johnston Survey A-681 and also in the north line of the W, Roark Survey A-1095; THENCE north 30 230 west a distance of 2884,8 feet to the teginning of a curve to the right, whose radius is 2864.93 feet and central angle is 110 561 17"1 THENCE in a northeasterly direction with said curve to the right a distance of 597.41 feet to the end of this centerline. AEE0028C/11 { 3 l S i 1 i i I i i ,'.,1 K Y apertdaNo ~ EXHIBIT "B" AAeadalt PC- Date 9 SERVICE PUW Annention Nnmben A-6S Acreage annexed 79.697 Acres Location: Along FM 2164 and extending approx. 3,482 feet North of Bobcat Road and tncloding 4SO fat on the Westside and SSO feet on the Fistside of FM 2164. (A-&9 A. Police Services 1. Patrolling, response to calls, and other routine services will be provided on the effective date of the annexation, using existing personnel and equipment. 2. Upon ultimate development of the area, the same level of police services will be provided to this area as are furnished to comparable areas within the City. B. Fige protection and Emergency Medical Services fEMS) 1. Fire protection and emergency medical services by the present personnel and present equipment, within the limitations of available water and distances from existing fire stations, will be provided to this area on the effective date of the annexation. _J 2. Upon ultimate dove-opment of the area,the same level of fire and emergency ambulance services will be provided to this area as are furnished to comparable areas within the City. C. Water/Wastewater Services water and wastewater services will be extended to the property in accordance to the city's master utility plan and Section 34-118 of the Denton Code of Ordinances. Developers shall pay the actual cost of all water and sewer main extensions, lift stations and other necessary facilities required to serve their development in accordance with the City's master utility plan and the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The City may participate in the cost to oversize water 6• i AgeoOal Gate 7-/9.9 71/t/ and sewer mains subject to fund availability and approval of the City Council. Where water or sewer main extensions, lift stations, force mains or other necessary facilities are Installed by the developer, the developer shall be entitled to reimbursement of the cost of such facilities from pro- rata charges paid by persons connecting to or using such facilities to serve their property, according to the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. D. Solid Waste Collection 1. Solid waste collection will be provided to the property at the same level of service as available to comparable areas within the City, within 60 days of the effective date of annexation. 2. As development and construction commence within this property, and population density increases to the proper level, solid waste collection shall be provided to this property in accordance with then current policies of the city as to frequency, charges and so forth. E. Streets and Roads 1. The City of Denton's existing policies with regard to street maintenance, applicable throughout the entire City, shall apply to this property beginning with the effective date of the annexation. 2. Routine maintenance of streets and roads will begin in the annexed area on the effective date or annexation using the standards and level of service as currently applied to comparable areas of the City. 3. Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installation of storm drainage facilities, construction of curb cuts and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the City Council or Manager, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. 4. Traffic signals, signage and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefor is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. 7 i ~pendaNo •O 2 _ Aovdaiteq 5 e I Date -/9- q 5. Street and road lighting will be installed in the 86t substantially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the City. F• Environmental Health and od nfo e c 1. Enforcement of the City's environmental health ordinances and regulations including, but not limited to the grass and weed ordinance, garbage and trash ordinance, junked vehicle ordinance, sign ordinance, food handler ordinance, animal control ordinance, and the tree preservation ordinance shall be provided within this area on the effective date of the annexation. These ordinances and regulations will be enforced through the use of existing personnel. 2. Building, plumbing, electrical, as, all othe construction codes, as may be adoptedaby the City, will be enforced within this area beginning with the effective date of the annexation. Existing ' personnel will be used to provide these services. 3. The City's zoning, subdivision and other ordinances shall be enforced in this area beginning on the effective date of the annexation. All inspection services provided Denton, but not mentioned above, will be p ovided to this area beginning on the effective date of the annexation, Existing personnel will be used to s provide these services. 5. Flood damage mitigation will be existing codes and ordinances of the City roved b as of the effective date of the annexation. 6. As development and construction commence within this area, sufficient personnel will be provided to furnish this area with the environmental health and code enforcsame level of ement services as are furnished to comparable areas within the City. G. P1anIlina and Develonm_UXY The zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to the annexed area on thr effective date of annexation. The tract is to be temporarily zoned Agriculture (A) zoning classification at the time of annexation. S penda No + D ' ~gendaltern ate _ 7--/ I• Parks and Recreation services Qe /(I Residents of the newly annexed area may use all recreation facilities, including parks and swimming pools throughout the City, on the effective date of the annexation. The same standards and Policies now used within the city will be followed in the maintenance of parks, playgrounds and swimming pools. J. Electrical Distribution Electrical power will be made available to the site as required, at the same level of service: currently being provided to comparable areas within the City. K. Miscellaneous s 3 Street names and signs will be installed, if required, approximately six (6) months after the effective date of annexation. Residents of the newly annexed area may use all publicly owned facilities, buildings or services within the city on the effective date of the annexation. Al). publicly owned facilities, buildings or services will ba maintained in accordance with established standards and policies now used in the city. ! I L. Qvital Improvements Program (CIPI The CIP of the City is prioritized by such policy guidelines 1 ast 1. Demand for services as compared to other areas will be based on characteristics of topography, land utilization, population density, magnitude of problems as related to comparable areas, established technical standards and 4 professional studies. r { 2. The overall cost-effectiveness of providing a specific facility or service. The annexed area will be considered for CIP improvements in r the upcoming CIP plan. This tract will be considered according to the same established criteria as all other areas of the City. . t y 1 5 9 ~-Q WOO ATTACHMENT 2 +(}BflQdit9 ~~(~4;^}}1gSS MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Kay 25, 1994 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, May 25, 1994, and began at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 215 E. McKinney. PRESENT FROM PBZ: Chairman Engelbrecht, Mike Cochran, Katie Flemming, Dick Norton, Richard Cooper, Barbara Russell ABSENT FROM P & Z: Dr. Huey PRESENT FROM STAFF: Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Development; Owen Yost, Urban Planners Mike Bucek, Assistant City Attorney; Jerry Drake, Assistant City Attorney; Gerald Cosgrove, Engineering Administrator for Water/Wastewater; David Salmon, Senior City Civil Engineer; Jim Harder, Director of Electric Utilities; Joe Thompson, Airport Manager; Veronica Oglesby, Administrative Assistant I; Gary Collins, Director of Information Services; Todd Parton, Urban Planner; Kathy DuBose, Acting Executive Director of Finance; Jon Fortune, Management Services Administration; Harry Persaud, Senior Planner; Lee Allison, Director of Water operations and Engineering; Rich Dlugas, Parks and Recreation; Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation; Lisa Manning, Secretary. 1. Consider approval of the minutes of the April 27, 1994 meeting. Mike Cochran made the motion to approve the minutes of April 27, 1994. Ms. Russell seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0. II. Hold a public hearing and consider making a recommenda- tion to the City Council with regard to the proposed annexation and temporary zoning of 79.69 acres located along FM2164 north of Bobcat Road (A-65). Staff report Presented by Harry Persaud. Mr. Chairman and members of the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion, the city proposed to annex a tract of 79.69 acres of land located north of Bobcat Road. The current city limits on the center line of Bobcat Road were established in 1974. We are moving 31482 north of Bobcat Road so that the city can establish new ETJ control in the north in the area of 2153. The shaded area on the slide is located east of 2164 and south of, 2153. The Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission has recently authorized Denton to provide Watea, / Wastewater i i i e gendaNe m,* DRAFT kgendalt - 9 Alf _ Minutes p&2 commission May 25, 1994 Page 2 services to extend farther north to the area east of 2164 south of 455. We are merely extending our ETJ area north. As you will notice Sangers ETJ is shown on the map. We couldn't go farther north based on this annexation. So far, we have held two public hearings before the city council and the Delaney family that lives outside of that area is opposed to the annexation. They are contending they probably will have to pay city taxes if the city does move farther north. Ms. Flemming: We talked about this another time didn't we? Mr. Persaud: We talked about the regulatory line in Division I & II. We will be coming back after the annexation shortly to have Division I extended to that area as well. The purpose of Division I is to be able to implement the subdivision regulations in those areas so we can have better control of development in those areas. Division II is that area which is outside of Division I. We are exempting those from the city's subdivision regulations, and we are using the county regula- tions in those areas. Mr. Norton: Am I to presume that the line on here marked Sanger ETJ is also the extent of our ETJ? Hr. Persaud: That is correct. Denton's ETJ goes up to Sanger's ETJ at this time. ~J Mr. Norton: The area that is proposed to be included in our ETJ, is that not in Sanger's ETJ now? Mr. Persaud: No. It is a violation of the local government code to extend ETJ into another cities ETJ. i h Hr. Robbins: There is an area now between Dentan's ETJ that { is south of that area. If you see line on the southern boundary, that is their existing ETJ, if you go north of that, you get to the line that says Sanger ETJ, that is in nobody's ETJ. The ETJ of Denton and the ETJ of Sanger are not cotermi- nous. Mr. Persaud: The area Frank is referring to is not in any city's ETJ. It is still an unincorporated area in the county. There are no homes in this area, just agriculture and pasture land. The tract extends 450 feet on the east side of the center line of 2164 and 550 on the west side making the total of a 1000 foot strip. Ms. Flemming: Is there some reason we didn't want to incorpo- • Y i Y T. A qendaNo Aendaltem g asp 7- / y DRAF T Commission minutes 1p&Z 994 may 25t Page 9 rate all of that land? around Mr. Persaud: Yes. There are some homes located gone tfurther the curve from that proposed tract. If we had north, we would have includedarea those homes. We decided to exclude them from Ms. Flemming: Why would we want to do that? Mr. Persaud: Including homes in the annexed area would incur an additional tax burden on those b en income for the City of Ms. Russell: Would that not h Denton? Mr. Persaud: Yes, it would contribute to our tax base, but s. s would not have been able tat furthers anervices in nexations in that area Currently staff is looking following further decision by based on councils directions you later. council, we may be coming back of Mr. Robbins: F think you asked an excellent qubetion, one would like to dive into that isn't discussed much. I that. line was annexed in 1974, thiThe nk The City of Denton existing A lot of people issue is the provision of thatithe•city is going to provide when the city annexes it, the water water and wastewatesr service. That is not the case, J and wah~aBame s rulese prwhenedevelopment occurseands itte under it gets built by the developer or if there is a needed, y problem in the area, it could be a capital improvement made. be delivered ervi - We think about the services that have to ervice. d that is a s n ection and garbage ately upon annexation, they get zoning a prot They have to have fire nyou extend it up the road a little service. In my thinking, if the amount of additional time further and pick up some houses, et there is that it takes our fire and police departments to provide those not much. it is not even a minute. Wes can services at essentially the same level in that area that they 1BW are provided in the area Just south . we That t annex areasethat requirement. I thinok8tuof ausntolbe way out there is because are perceived by m l that the servicewool the to a fundament Pexception it in based there is provide. Fundamentally, public hear- difficulty complaints from P the people visiting W! th us at complar ust a trade off. The goal is to ings. In this case, it is j where we have a CCN* have subdivision regulation authority The purpose was not to have additional tax base. I don't /z e JIR %QQWINO 6nda119m LLS S - qti /c/- -9Y--minutes P62 Commission / p~ /y May 25, 1994 Page 4 think the fiscal impact of that annexation would be much greater. we have to be careful about that. The intent is to get the subdivision regulation control out there where we have water and wastewater authority. There wasn't any need to a annex people and essentially have them pay us for stuff they don't perceive they are getting when they get annexed. Mr. Engllbrecht: The city in this case is the petitioner, so we have heard from the petitioner as well. Is there anyone present who would like to speak in favor or in opposition to thin petition. The public hearing is closed. Mr. Persaud any furi:her comments? Mr. Persaud: Staff is recommending that you forward a favor- able recommendation to city council. Mr Englebrecht: Has anyone in the area of proposed Annex- ation objected to the annexation in the public hearings? Mr. Persaud: There have been two public hearings before the city counoil on this annexation. As you have directed us in t the past, though not required by state Iasi, we did send courtesy letters to all of the property owners within the area to be annexed. Those letters were sent before the public hearings were held at the city council. I have gotten a call from one land owner, he didn't have any problems, as he was kind of speculating about future developments in that area. We haven't gotten any written or oral objections from people in that area. Mr. Norton: I move that we approve case NA-65. Mrs. Russell: I second the motion. Mr. Englebrecht: I has been moved and seconded to recommend approval to the city council. Motion carries 6-0. III. Cooper Landing i a. Hold a public herring to consider an amendment to Planned Development No. 72 by revising the Detailed Plan of a portion of Cooper Landin3. The 14.461 acre site is located or the north and east sides of Bell Avenue, east of Locust Street, I t f i i veodaNo - 5 ATTACHMENT 3 agWalten~ A•65 FM 2164 (1000' Strip) We 7 NORTH SITE I I Location Map C bale: 3/"4 Scale: None 1 y i CITY- - --COUNCI 111111j11 I I - I r 1 I f I i I / _J 01 00 4 O G b Q S~ G O r~M Z~ .i '4B~d~No ~•D ~ ~Oeada~(em~? ~ July 19 ioe~ CITY COUNCIL REPOR ~ T FOR1isT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council PROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 80BJECTt HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE REGULATORY LINE MAP SO AS TO INCLUDE THE AREA LOCATED EAST OF FM 2164 IN THE VICINITY OF FM 2153 IN DIVISION I OF THE ETJ. RECONMBNDATIONt r The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. (6 - 0) f G ~BYt The location of the existing regulatory line between the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and FM 2164 as established by Ordinance #93-033 and amended by ordinance 094-039 is shown on map (attachment #1). The line is drawn along the Elm Fork of j the Trinity River and includes the area located with in the corporate city limits. From the Elm Fork of the Trinity River the line follows FM 455 west to the ETJ; then continues along the ETJ line to a point on FM 2164. The Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC) has recently approved of Denton's certification (Certificate of public convenience and necessity) to include all that area south of FM 455 and east of FM 2164. City Ordinance #93-033 directs the Planning and Development Department to consider amendments to the regulatory line map whenever the certificate of public convenience and necessity for water and wastewater services is amended by the State. It is now proposed to amend the regulatory line map to extend Division I of the ETJ to include all that area east of F4 2164 In the vicinity of FM 2153. A copy of the proposed ordinance is included in attachment #2. EAC1C_ OROpND~ I On March 2, 1993 City Council adopted Ordinance 493-033 establishing a regulatory line in the extraterritorial jurisdiction and providing for the subdivision and land development standards of the State and the County to apply in areas located in Division II of the ETJ- The ordinance also provides for the Planning and Development Department to consider amendments to the regulatory line map and that such amendments shall be effective upon approval by the city r 4 n } r l AQefl0a~t S Date Council (attachment #3). On March 22, 1994 City Council adopted ordinance 194-039 (attachment #4) extending Division I of the ETJ to include all that area in the ETJ south of FM 455, between the Elm Fork of the Trinity and FM 2164. PROGRAMS, Q PARTMENTS OR OROOP8 AFFECTED: All city service departments including Utilities, Engineering, Planning and Development, Fire, Police, solid waste, Environmental Health, Parks and Recreation and Library. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed amendment of the regulatory line map will result in a higher quality of physical development and ultimately reduce city costs when that area is annexed into the City. Respe tfully subm ted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: N • vlnn., nr Harry N. Persaud, MRTPI, AICP Senior Planner a A roulftotblbinsl, iik f i Frank H. AICP ! Executive Director for t Planning and Development ATTACHMENTS: r i Attachment #1: Hap showing existing regulatory line and area to be added to Division 1 of the ETJ. Attachment #2: Ordinance proposing to amend the regulatory line map to add a new area to Division I of the ETJ. Attachment #3: Ordinance #93-033 establishing the regulatory line map. i Attachment #4: ordinance 094-039 amending the regulatory line map. Attachment #5: P i 2 minutes s a6571994 • i CITY ~COUNCI ~k o• o• ~ ♦ O ' 4 t d C 4 ♦j t o M ~ • ~0 G i ~ i ~ v. A~}2ndaNog[ . ,?L 3, A9t.~c¢ eltinc gs~s° ATTACHMENT l DD Ir TO DmlIO I OF THE ET ~r r~r rar~r~ _ DENTON PEOULAT Y-LI E ,r 1 j DFNT - ITt I r f je\wpdoce\ord\reglino.ord 'Q9f~8N0 a--~--~.-= kgerldal~,.~ ATTACkiMENT 2 We - 11ae /J ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS, AMENDING THE REGULATORY LINE MAP AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 93-033 AND AMENDED BY DATE. THEI CODE EOF O. 94-039 PURSUANT TO THE RDINANCES;; AND PROVI DING FOR RAN EFFECT VE SECTION OF WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 93-033 directs the Planning and Development Department to consider amendments to the regulatory stated whenever line map necessity for water and wastewater certificate service i sb amended by convenience and WHEREAS, the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission has approved the extension of Denton's certificate of public conve- nience extraterritorial jurisdiction, east of FMe2164oin the vicinity of FM 2153; and WHEREAS, the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 22, 1994, and considered amending the regulatory line map to include the area located in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction, east of FM 2164 in the vicinity of OrDivision 1, dinance No.t94 039, established NOW, b THEREFORE, No. 93-033 and FM 2153, by in a amended f THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SE= pI N I: That the regulatory line map, incorporated into S 34-38 of Chapter 34 of the Denton City Code by Ordinance No. 93-033 and amended by Ordinance No. 94-039, reflecting Division 1 and ~J Division 2 of the extraterritorial jurisdiction, is amended to include an area located in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction part Division hereof for shown east of 2164 made in "A" in the attached vicinity hereto of and 2153 on Exhibit all purposes. MTION II: That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be enjoined pursuant to the authority granted the City of Denton, Texas, by Section 212.003 of the Texas Local government Code as same exist today or may hereafter be amended, and such person shall be subject to the sanctions and civil penalties allowed the City under V.T.C.A. Local Government Code Section 54.011 as amended. sFCTION III: That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record Chronicle, the official newspaper of the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. I k i 1 Y r. r-p, y ApeadaNo ' Ap*lteir 7- PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. r it BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR t U, r ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY. 0-7 i e t i I I t I i e, s PAGE 2 r Rc do~ ~t b -QQ 4aT& EXHIBIT "A"i R 6 ~S ~ r mono= o'kow. DENTON ETJ LI E TO DIVIIIO 1 OF THE ET r~ 201 wrw ~~Y r f~ ~ r DENT -E ITS f- 1 i i t P ap9Ad~N0 2~ \wpdocs\ord\lendev.o 51 ATTACHMENT 3 AO~I 7~/S ORDINANCE NO- Q, ~D33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 34 ENTITLED SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT BY CHANGING SECTION 34-38 RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO DEFINE AND CLASSIFY TWO DIS- TINCT DIVISIONS WITH DIFFERING RULES, REGULATIONS AND PLATTING RE- RE- VIEWED AND UPDATED) PROVIDING FOR TINJUNCTIVE RELIEF RD VIOLATIONS THEREOF) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 212.003 of the Texas Local Gover stet CCod ube - allows the City of Denton to extend rules governing plats, divisions City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction; ands to public roads to the WHEREAS, Section 212.0045 of the Texas Local Government Code land allows the City of Denton to jurisdiction define and not require plattingnforlevery within the City's ti division of land; and WHEREAS, the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Denton extends for three and one-half miles from the corporate I limits and beyond the boundaries of the Greater Denton Planning I Area (GDPA) as defined in the Denton Development Plan and beyond the area defined yState ofiTexase pufor rsuant to Ve T C,A Necessity (OCR) issued by the 1 water r Code Section 11.242 relating to the City's supplying of eater water and wastewater services; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has prepared a map of the Cit_y's extraterritorial jurisdiction thedboundaries rof theoCDPAiand CCN, lowing, insofar as s possible, and beyond which services from the ttolthe reguulationse o! the allowing such area to develop pursuant County of Denton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION i. That Section 34-38 entitled "Development standards and requirements in the extraterritorial and Land Developmenttp1ofn the Code ter of 34 relating to Subdivision Ordinances read as Lollovs=by amended so that here- alter such section shall v t ' • aNo 9y-02 A4endalt ~ `da~/5 II Boo. Development standards and requirements in the extraterritorial jurisdiction. I (a) The Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of the City of Denton is classified into two (2) divisions as indicated on the map reflected in Exhibit °A" attached hereto and made a art hereof for all purposes. Division 1 is that area located within the regulatory line reflected on the map referenced above. Division 2 is that area on the map located outside the regulatory line defined in Division 1. (i) All of the provisions of this chapter go-orning sub- d. vision and development standards for ubdivisions within the city shall apply to all subdivisions and developments within Division 1. (ti) The subdivision and development standards of the County of Denton, as such standards exist today or as they may hereafter be amended, shall apply to all subdivisions and developments within Division 2. The approval of plats by the City for subdivisions and developments in the extraterritorial jurisdiction comprising Division 2 is not required and such subdivisions and develop- ments must comply only with development or plat re- quirements of Denton County and state law. (b) The Planning and Development Department is directed to consider amendments to the regulatory line map whenever the certi- ficate of public convenience and necessity for water and wastewater services is amended by the State, the Greater Denton Planning Area as defined in the Denton Development plan is revised, or when dir- ected by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council but such amendments shall not be effective until the revised regulatory line map is approved by the city council. SECTION 12. That the regulatory line map reflecting Division 1 and Division 2 of the extraterritorial jurisdiction shall be subject to review by the public in the Planning and Development Department. SECTION III. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be enjoined pursuant to the authority granted the City of Denton, Texas, by Section 212.003 of the Texas Local Gov- ernment Code as same exists today or may hereafter be amended, and such person shall be subject to the sanctions and civil penalties allowed the city under V.T.C.A. Local Government Code Section 54.011, as amended. SECTION Iy. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Py 2 i f 1 F + 4 -~Le leg_ 9 /5 Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the a? day of , 1993. SOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTI JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY t BYt j i t ~ I APPRO AS TO LEGAL FORK: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i C BYt . U Page 3 i 9, '~7 RY CY 13 W2 Y,t 'tIl -u P L+^aluK`\...VVMWb4G]7»W]t'.+M~..p'T :W.'fi.:J~/[sWJ~1t♦.u~^+fI~M +S T M~ f t '•~rl f'' t"-' 7 .x.d•~ ~t..~ 5 >~a ~C ~ ^ ,1,, ~j•~ P a ~Zv 1~•~"rr_I,S \ 133ru~~r~ll1 .t r•r 1 ! r. t r L 1 1v I I` i r e ~ K , ~e r •a - ~1 i I I ~_',U ~ (J/~ {{LLL~~ ~ _ . ~r ~ r c rR~i w.er:'.i.ua:c« ':'_n tiXro a ~I.~Y4mltar'NmuN.4R)wvq~iilr'.~iif~ll~ft:FLY.~[iCSV/ ~ ~ i4 i~7~1y a ~~1.rr^P1'`r"~+I.; 11'x:'1' °c,w'ii~+~ ~ ~,+t~ f r >t ~ . ~ L', r. w .r ':1 .a r°- ~ ,i I ~ 1 S t ~ i + < r 1 P'~ ~5 ',q~~~M. ~ <K ~ 1 i w i I i ~ ~ ~i I I I~ i _ ~ ,E r y,\wpdocs\ord\c"IIne.ord VeWaNo Age MaIttK g , 9 ATTACHMENT 4 Date ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, A14ENDING THE REGULATORY f LINE HAP AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 93-033; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 93-033 directed the Planning and certificate of public convenienceetand line Development whenever Department necessity for water and wastewater is amended by the State; and WHEREAS, the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission has approved of extending Denton's certificate of public cone- ' nience and necessity to include an area located in Denton's of FM 455 between the Elm Fork extraterritorial jurisdiction, rand F 2164; and of the Trinity WHEREAS, the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on January 12, 1994 and considered amending the f regulatory line map to include the area located in Denton's t extraterritorial jurisdiction, south of FM 455 between the Elm Fork NOW, 2164 OR Division 1 as established by of the Trinity Rive t and FK Ordinance No. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; secrlON Is That the regulatory line map reflecting Division I ~--J 1 and Division 2 of the extraterritorial jurisdiction is mended to include an area located in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction between the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and FM 2164 in Division i as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part hereof for all purposes and which is subject to review by thy: public in the Planning and Development Department. U&M QN Iis That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall be enjoined pursuant to the authority granted the City of Denton, Texas, by Section 212.003 of the Texas Local Government Code as same exist today or may hereafter be amended, and such person shall be subject to the sanctions and civil penalties allowed the City under V.T.C.A. Local Government Code Section 54.011 as amended. ~prrrsn III: That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (11) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record Chronicle, the official newspaper of the city of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. 1 f Y Y gen0anu 9~ -O_23 -'Ole -77 49-eWl PASSED AND APPROVED thi• thepy2-- day of 3994. BO CASTLEBERR , KA R r ATTEST: j JENNIFER HALTERS, CITY SECRETARY r r ~ t t BY: S APP VED AS TO LEGAL FORK: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY G BY I 4, PACE 2 ~oZ, Cy el EXHIBIT -W& No ASAP SHOWING AREA ADDED TO DIVISION Is AgwcW Or~le 1/ ~ /S - I DENTON ETJ F NORTH 0 2 SHIEPAM f ~ 1 I DENTON TORY IN ENT MITS I C swnaft r I do I l° l r DRAFT ATTACHMFNT 5 4WA ( Minutes P&Z Commission Date q-q June 22, 1994 Page 35 i phone, the applicant was undecided. There was one reply in favor. The downzoning does represent a reduction in the intensity and an increase in available intensity of approximately 2500 intensity trips for the study area. That is based on allocating 650 trips to an apartment in commercial zoning but under MF1 zoning it would be based a per acre. The staff, in light of the fact upon 2CO that there trips eduction in intensity and the apartment already exists, does recommend approval. Mr. Engelbrecht: Questions for staff? Is there a petitioner or petitioners representative present? Duke Stone: I am representing Paul Jost. This is not unlike a lot of things we see in Dallas. We just want to 9 be a conforming use based on the structures that are j there. E Mr. Engelbrecht: Questions for the petitioner? The public hearing is closed. Hr. Cochran: I move to approve Z-94-014. Mrs. Russell: I second the motion. Hr. Engelbrecht: It has been moved and recommend approval of Z-94-014. All in favor? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). VII. Hold a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to the City Council to amend the regulatory line map so as to include the area located east of FM 2164 in the vicin- ity of FH 2153 in Division I of the ETJ and therefore apply the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations in this area. + Staff Report given by Frank Robbins. ' Simply stated, this is now in the cities extra-territorial jurisdiction. It was annexed after your recommendation about three weeks ago. We were requesting that we move this area in which we would apply our subdivision and landuse regulations. This is part of a briefing we made to the council and for which there were a numkor of public hearing hold. Fundamentally this area is an area in which the city has authority to provide water and wastewater service. We feel that the subdivision regulations are t aenoano 9'l/. 1101 ~t late M n3 p42 Commission June 22, 1994 Page 36 appropriate. Engelbrecht: The city is the petitioner. Is there Mr. opposition present the petition. The to seak in favor of or in public hearing is closed. anyone Mr. Cochran: I move for approval of the extension of the regulatory line map. Mrs. Russell: I second. Mr. Engelbrecht: It has been moved and second to recom- mend approval of the extension of the regulatory line map. Motion carries unanimously (6-0). VIII. Work Session. Discuss sidewalk regulations and give staff direction. Mr. Salmon: Sack in February 1994 we were directed to put siwalks together a workshop to address ire all sidewalksabe built connect. Currently we that requ osed an z up front with public improvements. You prop exclusion for single family residential that they wouldn't have to do their sidewalks until the building actually went in. Currently all sidewalks have to be installed up j front with all the water, sewer, streets, and etc. We do if we have a fee i lieu Co for eidewalk have a streets capitalfimprovementoproject in li es within the next two years. We have several other exceptions, mainly dealing with construction on single family residential lots. They are normally excluded from sidewalk construction unless they i are part of a larger development. We also exclude lots t of that are 100 feet or less We do width unless they are require si ewalks rin a j s larger development. lat single family residential rep We exif the clude osidewalks efr m ' did not require sidewalks. division II of our ETJ. If you are in division I of the ETJ but are 8,000 fee away from a city watere, youew don't have to build a sidewalk. There are quite exceptions to building sidewalks for properties. None of the cities we polled have any exceptions to sidewalk ordinances that address sidewalks that don't F a r CITY=== --~--COUNCI 1 4- IF IF I IF ` y r0 ~ s 9 o° e y t♦ G dgw~9aue. -0 Age~da4(e DATE: July 19, 1994'--~-h REPORT TO: Mayor and members of the City Council I FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOTS 1-7 OF BLOCK Al LOTS 3-34 OF BLOCK B, LOTS 1-22 OF BLACK C, AND LOTS 1-13 OF BLOCK D OF THE CROWN OAKS ADDITION. SIMULTANEOUSLY CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF LOTS 16-18 OF BLOCK C OF THE TIMBER OAKS ADDITION; INTO LOTS 16R AND 18R. RECOMMENDATION: I The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval with the condition that the intersection spacing standard be amended to allow an intersection at Sandpiper Drive and Abbotts/Skylark Drive. P&Z has recommended approval of the ordinance to allow this intersection. R : The 24.43 acre site is located north and east of Teasley Lane, roughly between Sandpiper Dr. and Pennsylvania Dr. It is currently undeveloped and is proposed as 75 single-family residential lots, with none having driveway access to Teasley Lane. The intersection spacing between Sandpiper Dr. and Abbotts/ Skylark Dr., allows for typical residential lot layouts, and is deemed as safe by the City Engineer. Currently, an amend- ment to the subdivision and Land Development Regulations is being reviewed to statutorily authorize such spacing. Public improvements, associated with the final plat/replat include paved interior roads (Abbotts Ln., Hope St., Chapel Dr. and Providence St.), concrete sidewalks, water lines, fire hydrants, sewer lines, street lights and drainage improvements as shown. BACKGROUND: The current zoning is single-family residential (SF-10) which allows the proposed use and lot sizes. Right-of-way between lots 17 and 18 (block B) will be dedicated with the final plat for drainage, utility and sidewalk uses. f • \ YFtly . Ape~deNo.,.~D Z3 Apendalt ~ The applicant has stated that he will contractually ob igate Z o~lJ builders to contribute funds according to the park donation policy. The applicant has also given the City the tight to transplant existing trees from their planned road right-of- way, for use in Southlakes Park. Services and facilities; including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available or planned for. The plat and replat conform to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, Chapter 94 of the Code of Ordinances, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Property owner, Park & Recreation Dept. FISCAL IMPACT; None. t Respectfully submitted, Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 1 Prepared by, G. Owen Yost, ASIA ~J Urban Planner Approved by, j Frank H. Robbins, ICP Executive Director of Planning & Development ATTACHMENTS; 1. Location map. 2. Proposed plat and replat. AKX00602 v i i AgeodaNaS 5 Aoeedalle ATTACHMENT 1 (kt9 7_/9g_y Crown Oaks Addition 301 NORTH y ~u a \ atar vti a tot ~ t 3 v~ /00 . 1 qi 1 ~ 1 D v,~~ eQo WA go If W* 4tH AU ~ f .a j Date: 7/1/'94 Scale: None J 1 5 ap06aNa 62L --0;~2 ATTACHMENT 2 Apendal} S S _ 7.-~ Crown Oaks Addition (Timber Oaks Replatpte 7 Kil NORTH rl ~ r~ f ~ ~ , MBE 5 Q!~'' J2 J6F'q+ cj 1 S oil. ~ 1 ~ Loa +v •.n::.~•. K 01*21, 3a IF 33L$3' • ff 01.21'3a 0 • 1~' N01'!I'3a of 01.2 If 1. W36' 3' K{f Si']0' [ f11. 111 1. QO' M 01,23' M • [ hill ~Jr _ •.~!~ie IaK, ;M w 1 ►Rn.uo y i1 ►til - rll . i a~ ra - .j~ • Is i ,I , ~1 .I. alai f•10 I+ 1 Ar, ` 1 1 1 La L 'dq 1 ♦ C ~ ' \ . 1 • YRCVIn~1CE STREET ` 1 s - 1 N 11 0101~1 1 1 W A L ~ \ \ / + l Nf 1 ~ ~ , ' ~ 1 N 'twig 34- to, t• 131. ~r+1ct- - il' .\i .a 1 OWN m ~'m I^ , ~j3 01'23 TeSASI f t-A~+E Preliminary Replat Date, 7/7194 Scale: None i 1 IF ape~da~tar~ ~..5-~,SE Minutes Pit Commission Rat9 7-/9-'N July 13, 1994 S~/f Page 24 DRA"T Mrs. Russell: I second. Mr. Cochran: I just want to say that streets with slopes like that make interesting neighborhoods. The regulation sort of imposes some blandness. Mr. Engelbrecht: All in fav.:-- 3f the motion? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). VIII. Hold a public hearing to consider the preliminary plat of approximately 24.43 acres of unplatted land into Lots 1-7 of Block A, Lots 3-34 of Block B, Lots 1-22 of Block C and Lots 1-13 of Block D of the Crown Oaks addition, located north and east of Teasley Lae, roughly between Sandpiper and Pennsylvania Drives. Simultaneously consider the preliminary replat of Lots 16-18, Block C, Timber Oaks Addition into Lots 16R and 18R. Staff report given by Owen Yost: t This is the Crown Oaks Subdivision that you talked about before, in relation to the intersection spacing. This are subdivision is planned for approximately 75 single family lots. It is currently zoned SF10. None of these lots will have direct driveway access to Teasley Lane. The area that we replatting is what was three lots at the north west, that will be replatted into two lots plus the street which at that point is named Skylark or Abbotts. I am not sure at that ~J point what they are going to name the street. The public improvements which are associated with the final replat of this area include the pavement of the interior streets (Abbotts Lane, Hope Street, Chapel Drive, and Providence Street), concrete sidewalks, waterlines, fire hydrants, sewer lines, street lights, and drainage improvements as shown. The primary drainage improvement on site is the right of way shown. That right of way will be dedicated for drainage, utility, and sidewalk uses. The purpcse behind having that be a right of way rather than an easement is so that the adjacent owners will not be motivated to put a fence in that area. I would like to make one small change in the recommendation of the Development Review Committee: The regulations of City of Denton be amended as we heard earlier, allowing the intersec- forwartion thet council showAi. If with your this Is e,ommen ation,it will be Mr. Engelbrecht: Is the petitioner or the petitioners representative present? II i ApendaNo 0141-40 a-, AQendait~= Minutes PiZ Commission ate rv~ July 131 1994 Page 25 Kevin Kendrick: I am an engineer with the consulting firm of Rust, Lichliter-Jameson of Dallas. I am here on behalf of Tony Sisk, the developer who is with JAS Family partnership. On May 11, we came in with a preliminary plat on this with a slightly different scenario. Everything is the same except the extension of Abbotts lane to Sandpiper. This is being requested by the builder that the developer is currently talking to for several reason. The main reason is the lot that is at the corner of Teasley and Sandpiper is the only lot in the whole tier including existing subdivisions that would actually front on Sandpiper. This would require a driveway on Sandpiper close to Teasely. To make this lot a little more desirable we would like to move our driveway to this location right here. The developer is currently talking to six local builders. It is their request that we come in with a revised preliminary plat. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any questions for Mr. Kendrick? Is there anyone present who would like to speak in favor of this petition? Jay Minton: I reside at 828 Sandpiper. ; am in favor of it. I see nothing wrong with it. They are widening Teasley Lane and there will be stop light. The traffic won't be any worse than it is now. Sandpiper has no streets until you get to Pennsylvania, so this would be the only intersection between Teasley and Pennsylvania. I think it would be a great addi- tion. I would like to see the state get the drainage fixed, l I would like to talk to the engineer about the drainage can Chapel Drive. You have an active creek running from Pennsyl- vania to the Teasley ditch. Mr. Engolbrecht: Anyone else present who would like to speak in favor of this petition. Is there anyone present who would like to speak in opposition to the petition. Sam Marino: I live dt 1000 Sandpiper. I live on Indianapolis speedway, we have a tremendous amount traffic. Sandpiper is as busy as Londonderry. I would like to know if those lots equal the lots on Sandpiper? If they aro not the same, what are they going to do about Denton ISD? Has anyone discussed this with the schools? Mr. Engelbrecht: Is there anyone else who would like to speak in opposition to this petition? Jack Becker: I reside at 912 Sandpiper. We are the fourth house down on Sandpiper. First we would like to have had a little more time to react to the proposal. We only got notice j A l ~endeNO ~u'0 Apeodalle 9 Minutes Piz Commission o~te_ 7 - y July 131 1994 74// Page 26 within the last 2 weeks about this hearing. All of us are in favor of a development, we would like to see something comparable to the area. This is between some very good housing additions. I am little disappointed the developers didn't aim a little higher in the housing. Several months ago I was advised several of the properties had been extended. There are about four that have not been extended because of their easement. That is primarily because we built our fences on the easement and the people who built their fences on the boundary were given additional easement property. There are three major drainage areas addressed. Currently this is a river. This.property behind the houses is a river when it r;ins. There is in fact a creek bed that goes down Chapel Dr1ve that is dry except when it rains. There is another active creek bed on Abbotts Ln. The other issue is there is a creek bed behind Sandpiper. I was advised tonight for the first time by the city engineer, that I may have to address some plumbing issues. r Mr. Cochran: How big is your lot? Mr. Becker: The property is very close to the size of at least the ones we would be butting up against. Mr. Cochran: I was just trying to figure out on what basis you are basing your statement. i Mr. Becker, Lot size. I Mr. Engelbrecht: Aren't you zoned SF-10? ! Mr. Beckert I am just pointing out we are putting more housing in at the very lowest level in this area. t j Mr. Cochran. Is it your feeling that the plan before us will 3 make this problem worse? I Mr. Beckert .I believe so, with regards to the drainage especially. I don't think it has been considered. Dr. Huey: You referred to an easement and the construction of fences, what kind of easement is it? Mr. B6ckert It is a utility easement for phone or power. we built our fence on the easement line. Many of the owners put their fene• on the property border. They were for some reason granted by the construction company an additional 20 feet. I am concerned if you build fences in here, where will the water go? I i I I I A ondaNo Agendaltem e Date 7 Minutes P3Z Commission July 13, 1994 Page 27 Mr. Engelbrecht: That dark line as I understand it, is the property line and it in fact does make a jog. but not at one time. Mr. Becker: I think it does now, Mr. Engelbrecht: I don't think that would have been possible. They couldn't have taken your property. Mr. Becker, They didn't take property, they gave property to other property owners. Dr. Huey: The easement is affecting the drainage? Ar. Becker: Some neighbors and myself are mowing that area. By building more houses behind, all the water will flow behind us. Dr. Huey: It drains straight to the south? Mr. Becker: If you walk behind our house, in this area, there is a natural gully, the water naturally goes there. Mr. Engelbrecht: We will ask staff to address this and the petitioner. Mr. Becker: I wish we had a little more tine to review this. I Mr. En elbreht: is here anyone else who would like to speak in opposition Mr. Kendrick: During the preliminary platting stage we go through the drainage study. We are aware of the drainage problem. We designed our storm sewer system to taste into bacfar as k lots. he That k has lots, reflected account the problem. putting any water on the As on our preliminary plat. we will try to accommodate Mr. those Backer's concerns hen sqwe get to that uare fo tagepoint. we area maare tching aware the other lots. We do havs some larger and some that are exactly planto highway takeimprovements, care of s The problem. tying intoa their system. We the Mr. Engelbrechts Any questions for Mr. Kendrick? Mr. Engelbrecht: The public hearing is closed. Dr. Hueys is any of this flood plain area? Mr. Salnon: Yes, the hashed area. There is a little bit. I it ~geedaNo Q~-Q^-~_ 4genda'17 Minutes PSZ Commission Gate July 17, 1994 Page 28 The reason that flood plain is there is because the culvert under Teasely Lane is too small. The flood plain map won't be amended, it wont be in the flood plain once the drainage is fixed. Mr. Norton: From what I have observed, they have doubled the capacity of that culvert in the last month. Mrs. Russell: I know of a house where the drive way acts as a riverbed and dumpu all of the water on a house that has been built there for some time. What type of recourse does a homeowner have? Mr. Salmon: The issue of lot to lot drainage has always been a gray issue. In 1990 we revised the ordinance we had a requirement that said no more than 2 lots can drain across the third. They will be required to grade the lots along the north side of Chapel Drive such that they drain to the street. They either need to grade them properly toward the streets and if that is impossible, they have to a rear storm drainage system. They will have to submit a master grading plan with their final plat. They have not done any topography surveys or major calculations at this point. They cannot tell us exactly what they are going to do. When they do come in with their final plat, they will have to have detail calculations, topography, master lot grading plan with construction draw- ings. When houses are built we enforce the grading plan. Once the house is final, it is out of our hands. onca they move in, it becomes a civil issue. They do their own land- scaping, pools, etc., the city does what they can do up to the point until the house is finished. Mr. Engelbrecht: When the final plat comes in there could be additional drainage easements. Mr. Salmon: Correct. This is just the engineers best guess at this point. Mr. Engelbrecht: This will go through Development Review Committee, and if they do not meet all city specifications, they will no' recommend approval to us. Mr. Salmon: Right. Mr. Engelbrech6 what was the standard previous to 1990? Mr. Salton: Currently, there was no regulation in regards to adjacent lot drainage. T;>is is a fairly new requirement. . Y R~ ,gendaNo Agendalte 5e Minutes P&Z Commission July 130 1994 UU Page 29 Mr. Engelbrecht: I remember that, it was looked a relatively carefully in terms of how much drainage could one lot handle. We had nothing. That basically refers to two•lots of similar size. Isn't that the standard we used? Mr. Salmon: There are exception to that. When you have three acres lots, all of them are three acres and you have a little more room for drainage than in a SF10 or SF7. It is all relative. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any time you have a slope in the ground one of them is going to take the water. Mr. Salmon: It is very common. I would say 1/2 if not more of our drainage problems we get called on are lot to lot, c civil type matters. I don't want to minimize the concerns these citizens have. f Mr. Engelbrecht: other questions for staff? Dr. Huey: There are about 1/2 dozen houses in this flood plain that you say will go away when the storm drainage is installed. We have heard that before. We have had people who couldn't build a fence because of the flood plain. Mr. Salmon: In addition to that, recall in the new ordinance revisions that are coming up , we are adding a, requirement to set minimum finished floor elevations whenever you are adjacent to a drainage easement. Even though the ordinance isn't in affect right now, we do try to work with the develop- J ers to get grades established. Mr. Robbins: When building permits were issued, they will have to elevate above it. Mr. Salmon: The fact that the map shows this area is in the flood plain, we will have to require a minimum finished floor in this instance anyway. Dr. Huey: I think drainage and flooding have been the most serious, constant, intractable problem that has come before us. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other questions for staff? Any further comments or a mution. It meets minimum requirements for a preliminary plat. Mrs. Russell: I move approval of the preliminary plat of Lots u +pendaNo _9y' 0a3 4gendalte S S~ 7atE 7-~ y Minutes PiZ Commission July 13, 1994 Page 30 1-7 of Block A, Lots 3-34 of Block B, Lots 1-22 of Block C, and Lots 1-13 of Block D of the Crown Oaks Addition and a preliminary replat of Lot 16-18 of Block C of the Timber Oaks Addition into Lots 16R and 18R with the condition that the intersection spacing between sandpiper Dr. and Abbotts/Skylark Drive be allowed. Mr. Norton: I second. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any discussion on the motion. Mr. Cochran: I have listened very carefully, I am pretty convinced our regulations are going to provide us with something better than what is out there right now. As far as traffic goes, I believe there are enough altered routes to this area, that this is not going to compound the problem on Sandpiper. I am comfortable with voting for this. Mr. Engelbrecht: Traffic is going toIncrease if you put more houses in. I would suggest that you work with the staff, particularly with engineering. With regard to drainage, our regulations are much better than they have ever been. I feel the situations can and will be handled. With regard to s zoning, this property has been SF10 since staff can't recall. All of those in favor? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). IX. McDonnell Highlands, located on the south side of McKinney Street, across from Billy Ryan High School. a. Hold a public hearing to consider rezoning 24.125 acres of Planned Development No. 98 from PD to SF-7. Staff report by Owen Yost. This is an application to rezone 24.125 acres from PD to SF7 zoning. The site is located on the south side of McKinney directly across from Billy Ryan High School. Currently it is in PD-98. This portion is within the city. The portions of the land directly to the west, east; and south are not within the city. The land to the south, east, and west are undevel- oped. There is no significant impact on transportation, utilities, or drainage. 31 notices were mailed out within 200 feet of the sight being zoned. He have not received any written replies. We have had approximately 4 telephone calls gathering information. There is an overall reduction in intensity trips. The PD did allow for SF residences, duplex, i - - - ~~=CITY~~:=: ~COUNCI A O G t c 0 e ~ • er ti. ~Q~' GI CITY =-COUNCI 1:1 IMM Ift OF Q 0 % h A. jQ 0 s O~ Q 4 P 0 N. is ~~QQQGG4~~co i ~IeOANo'~ ~penEaNe MR./ / DATE: July 19, 1994 ~-~g^ `y 161~s REPORT TO: Mayor and members of the City Council t FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY REPLAT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLACK 1, DENTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ADDITION, PLUS 12.6 ACRES OF UNPLATTED LANDi INTO TATS IR AND 2 { RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. r i CRY: + The 48.398 acre site is located northeast of Interstate 35-E and northwest of Mayhill Road. The proposed lot 1R is the site of the Denton Regional Medical Center (under construction). The use of the remainder of the site is currently unknown. k l Public improvements, associated with the final replat, include paving and median landscaping of the relocated portion of I Colorado Blvd., water lines, fire hydrants, sewer lines, street lights and drainage facilities as shown. Also with the final replat, the applicant will be dedicating right-of-way for the future Loop 288, and constructing a portion of the roadway. )}bS~KSrFi43i~I2: The site is zoned Commercial-conditioned (C(c)). Prior to April of 1993 it was composed of two Planned Development dSstricts (PD-91 and PD-92). Ser+ices and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, ' telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available or planned for. The replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulationst Chapter 34 of IiI the Code of Ordinances. i l f ff 1 f u . f fy y a ~gendaNo apeedalte S ~L ate 7-19~'L PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Property owner, Transportation & Engineering Dept. FISCAL IMPACT# None. i Respectfu submitted, 4 Lloyd V. Harroll, City Manager.. I Prepared by, i r 0. Owen Yost, ASLA Urban Planner Approved by, v r. Frank H. Robbi , AICP Executive Dire for of Planning & Development ATTACHMENTS. 1. Location map. 2. Proposed preliminary replat. j AXXD060? i y genaan~ C741 _ Dgs- ATTACHMENT i a8end~tem~/ Denton Reigional Medical Center (Replat) 0ef ° NORTH VICINITY MAP co TREATWNT ANT SPENCER z M.tt[4dc 9 FOSTER r y~ a a ~ Z o>° 4e SITE a t EDWmws C~ gq'q~b s ~ ~ v0 Eft y LHCORN LAKE Location Dtap I Date: 718194 Scale: None s gan0aao ATTACHMENT 2 +~eoda~tem Q~ We '7- 1. Denton Regional Medical Center yv~S NORTH w NOr C(.) -rrvirw J' / ioNlNO~ cid y' e--, .rr,e to •;;li'(' ~ ~ _y. lowwo, V4 r 0, LOW 0 .00, Ill i "'rr:..ws n,l .P. ~ ,~1 ,"L _ a•' ll 1 ~ "S ,fJ 7N?FAS ~4TF H7GMWA>' w> > . C i ` S"SR'~~ + Preliminary Replat Date: 7/7/44 Scale: None i ;r l ~P~~Q ICI +genualtem AWe Minutes PAZ Commission uete July 13, 1994 S~.s Page 37 Mr. Engelbrecht: So what we are going to end up with is two intersections along Loop 288 where before we would have had one. Mr. Salmon: It originated by a request from the owners of the properties in order to develop it tho way they needed to. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other questions for Mr. Yost with regard to the General Development Plan? Mr. Cochran: I move approval Mrs. Russell: I second. Mr. Engelbrecht: All of those in favor of the motion? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). d. Consider the preliminary replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Denton Regional Medical Center addition, plus 12.666 acres of unplatted land into 48.398 acres composed of Lots 1R and 2. Staff report given by Owen Yost. The current plat on record stops at the proposed Colorado Blvd. Since you have now vacated Colorado Blvd. it allows them to add approximately 12.6 acres of unplatted land to the plat. We are looking to replat. Included in the replat is Lot 2 that is unchanged from what is already on record. Th3 site as well as the whole GDP which we just saw is zoned commercial conditioned and of course is being used for a hospital. The DRC does recommend approval of this replat. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any questions for Mr. Yost? Any comments or a motion? Mr. Norton: I move that we apl.ove the preliminary replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Denton Regional Medical Center, plust 12.6 acres of unplatted land into lots 1R and 2. Mr. Cochran: I second. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any discussion on the motion? All in favor? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). I XII. Consider the partial easement abandonment located in Southridge Estates. i Staff report by David Salmon. =CITY- -C®UN( V r'O M r r Cy'r~r r f 43 1t n 1 AgMKi~Ab ~pend211e y a' DATE: July 19, 1:94 REPORT TO: Mayor and members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOTS 1-10 OF BLACK A, P.ND LOTS 1-21 OF BLACK B, OF THE DEERWOOD ADDITION, PHASE Ill FiNBflTS4Ii' The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval. north west of The located Farris.Road acre isit t eissdi ectly south of K he sHodgeaElementary F School. You reviewed a preliminary plat of this same site this past winter. Since then, the Denton Independent School Di trict has entered into a contract with the which is currently used as acres shown as the proposed lot 1, would a play field by Hodge School. This plat, if approved, replace the current preliminary plat. Lot i of block A would continue as a play field. The remainder of the site is proposed to be subdivided into 30 { single-family homesites. Public impLovements, associated with the final plat, includes paved interior roads (Whitetail Dr. and Deer Forest Dr.), partial paving of perimeter roads (Kings Row and Farris Rd.), concrete sidewalks, 6 in. water lines, fire hydrants, 8 in. sanitary sewer linos, street lights and drainage structures as shown. aneK ROUND: Until this past winter, t wasanrezoned d was to within sina planned develcnment. On 12/8/99, (SF-7) district, which allows the proposed residential use as wall as a park/field. i I i gendaNo u-o Q ~anoaicem.,~ B ~~P r Services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer~~ telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available or planned for. The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulationsi Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. The final plat of Phase I and the preliminary plat of Phasa II remain unchanged. A PRQ(`,1'ZAM$ DEP&R't'MFNTS OR GR n AFFECTED: Property owner, Dallas independent School District. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Respectfully submitted, 'fi 3a Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Prepared by, G. Owen Yost, ASLA Urban Planner v I i Approved by, Frank H. Robbi , AICP Executive Dire or of Planning A Development &MCHMENTS: 1. Location map. s 2. Existing preliminary plat. 3. Proposed preliminary plat. i n,cKOOeos MOW- i • 1 1 ~enoaNO *C? ~ gen~altem ATTACHMENT alp 2NORTH Deerwood Addition Phase III 30I7 F ~ ~o 0 DA o 7~ Q DEERWOOD PKWY i StI.VER DOME KINGS ROW Phase 3_ oQ E ~ am m i i Location Map , Date: 717/94 Scale: None is { a jencaNo 9y_0?.a3- oenda3tem.~,~ n n~ ~ ATTACHMENT 2 U-ti 7 .i i I 1 ~ ~ r I 1 I I1 P i L i i S 8,8,'57'40°E 462.5,17' i3s, 89' Ice Jan' / 1 j 1?+ i u a d.. 0 I ~I f 1 j ° ro of yr 3 I _IX '6 N h •/J'l RS': j • d J. ~ti 9o' ,'1• 41 / 79 f 1 a , ti / / 7 y. 20- J, w 2 1` / py~.3~'I 9f ~i ~I ~r ~a7:arl tar ! j I F---144'..- S 8,9° 5'221E 2Gncl 19621, uamM9l d t. a.:' f,. 9 7r' r •9 17 r V 1154/0, 43 % d 9 1 0. t r i t %i I{ 1 iA k{ 10 IiI ~ti 1 Ae 9~ --a' Son.- 7EfAlL ~P.IVE •l~ 70' J ra: 1 \ \ 60' Mab4abl4 af, 'ti S \ 120 or, 8,141.54Ibecs ,Q \ ` j~ ~s° i f~ 20 21 22 J 1 19 k. -7r, I e It NIP, to rlr. Are a..' • \ ,r p N { (ifi l[CCN°I F,% • J• ti 17 16' qL n e t4 O't-J g j \ {I ~S .f 9 3. C.O. ct CC Oil C+PP~ST A55CGIA1101i s~ ,pt 6 6on.v6 ~ 1 cJ 01a+ 1 SF -7 ,,".OIJIlLi • A ~ 0 C~ 4l4 3 df at' 14 j / of cr .I ` O\I 10 TO 13 ovoths *4 Power polls 11 of 4 1 r KINGS ROW 6 4' cc *ao'ia o o.e earlaq S 8,9'0705 W ,417.61 \ aenoar~c, . 9~'.~ ATTACHMENT 3 Qendalfom 6 I SIP y ~X Deemood Addition Phase 111 547 NORTH W O. FN M ~T1 / I I • was u 4$ M !0 " olso . ~CPAWS Ob AODri ~ I ; . - - - _ Na • o.D r. im oua I x Ito. I h r. S ram. + r Z ! \ c 1 !•~Yw't ale e31a w --~rury111~ 1 1 M A WILSON I . 1 \ L.f L 1.1 Aer. xr n } ~ ` pr/r YDJ M Clry J Pr/r a•v aoral► • I 1 _ . } if L 16 IPi • d p 1 F' ° r X"Jr CL V4 Alp. ' i ~ e r usoc iw+ ~ sr•~ soNti.► ~ ~ o w •r ► s 7 I L r.l. r 1 } Of KINGS • • •10• _ -l- - - _ 1-o a ti 41 11'r 847r 7 C "M. f~ J f I t I Preliminary Plot k Mite: IM94 Scale: None i aef108~4ti - bG ~enda~tem./~u Minutes PU Commission 6 da July 13, 1994 Page 34 L a. Consider the preliminary plat of Lots 1-10, Block A, and Lots 1-21, Block B of the Doerwood Addition, Phase 3. The 12.90 acre site is located north of Kings Row and west of Farris Road, at Silverdome Road. b. Consider the final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Denton County Maintenance Facility (previously known as I Denton County Municipal Project). This 10.303 acre tract is located on Ruddell Street south of the extension of Hickory Street. F.Engelbrecht.: Cochran: I move approval of the consent agenda. Norton: Second. All in favor? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). XI. Denton Regional Medical Center, located east of Interstate 35 and north of Mayhill Road. f` a. Consider the vacation of 3.853 acres of the final plat of the Southern Hills addition, Phase 1. i Mr. Yost: The land in question, you will see no difference on J the ground from what is currently planned. The items before ~J you relate to platting and vacating plats only. Eventually, there will be a real improvement to Colorado Blvd. The first items to be considered are vacations of two plats that are already existing. i Mr. Salmon: The first item is a partial vacation of the original Southern Hills plat. In the mid 80's the developers platted the right of way for Southern Hills Blvd and Colorado } Blvd. The current developer is proposing to abandon a portion of Colorado Blvd. and replace it with a right of way. We are requesting the vacation document not be filed until they file the plat for the second section. Staff recommends this portion of the Southern Hills plat be vacated. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any questions, comments or a motion? Mr. Norton: I move approval of the partial vacation of plat for the Southern Hills Phase I. F Mrs. Russell: I second. s k r l r Q J gendaNU ~T ~genlzltem,~:.' T tote _ 7' ~ 7el7 i-1~ lrti1 Minutes PAZ commission i LJ July 190 1994 Page 33 Staff report given by Mr. Yost. This shows the proposed lotting, street layout, easements, etc. The public improvemento associated with the final plat of this piece land will involve interior street paving, sidewalks along all streets, water lines, fire hydrants, sewer lines, street lights and drainage structures. There are two access points to this subdivision. The first is the obvious one, the intersection of Glen Gerry, tha central spine road and McKinney. Also there is another one proposed on the edge of the sight. The land if approved would be SF70 both the PD and the SF7 will allow single family homes. The plat does conform to the subdivision regulation of the City of Denton. DRC does recommend approval. Mr. Engelbrecht: I would like to ask a question. I notice there is a outfall ditch 1 A 2. What will the developer have to do. Mr. Salmon: They will have to satisfy the property owner. The owner has the opportunity to make any arrangement he needs. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other questions for staff? Mr. Cochran: I move we approve the preliminary plat of 100 in 7 blocks within McDonnell Highlands Phases 2 and 3. -J Mr. Norton: I second that. Mr. Engelbrecht: I personally don't particularly care for the straight line approach to this street. We are going to have one of these streets where speed is a problem. I would like to see a curve or something to consider traffic. I make that as a comment. It does meet our subdivision regulations. All of those in favor? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). XI Consent Agenda: The following items are recommended by 'the staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of staff recommendation. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the Executive Director for Planning and Development or his designer to proceed with each item in accordance with the staff recommendation. Now- i CITY --COUNCI I.rrrrrr Cap ~ o c' e $ GG~~ ApbAdtNo W Age 63 I ~o~a6 ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD PUBLIC OF CONTRACTS FOR PROVIDING EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR ANEFFECTI EODATE. WYLREAS, the city has solicited, received and tabulated with the construction public lstateolaw and cometitive bids for improvements in accordance the City ordinances= and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the c works or ~ bids for the construction of the publi lowest responsible sals and proposals ro 0 plansvandnspecifications therein; NOW,~i invitation, id P THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:1 SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the i beer assigned responsible hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 1650 JAGOE PUBLIC CO. $548,248.00 1651 H & H PLUMBING AND UTILITIES $188,581.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and -approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of uch public works or impr w4thealln accepted requirements specified in the Notice person shall comply omply andcontract ofbondawritten i to Bidders including the timely execution insurance furnishing of performance and payment certificate after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements tIn accordance with { the bids accepted and approved herein, provided l1 P theNotice to reto specifying Bidders nterms, are made roposals, in adocuments relating the conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. 1 I f agandaNu. Agenda4te ' Date ~ ~ 2b SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the city Council hereby authorizes the expenditure bids and authorized contracts amount as specified in such uch approved executed pursuant thereto. l r SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. ,1994. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR S• a. ` l y ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY s BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYs k f I' t 3 i r agenQaNo. Agandalt ' Cato 2 4 C2b C SEC'CION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council in the manner and in the hereb amount as tspecified h in such approved bids funds and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. 1994. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of BOB CASTL£BERRY, MAYOR s, ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY By: GAL FORM: APPROVED AS TO LR DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY 1 Byt S3 E v i a t(~s _ r :t A~geenndalte Date N ~ y J DATE: JULY 19, 1994 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BIT) tl1650 - KINGS ROW WATLR & SEIVER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Jagoe Public Company, n the total amount of $548,248.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for all labor am >aaterials necessary in replacing waterlines In the Kings Row area and. Hulsache Streets, and replacement of the sanitary sewer on Yellowstone Drive. These waterlines have been a continual maintenance problem and replacement is more cost effectivo than continued repairs. The Yellowstone sewerline will alleviate sewage backups which have occurred In wet weather. Five bid proposals were : acelved in response to thirty-eight notices to bid mailed to contractors. k r BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Rt.•ommendation from the Utility Department Lee Allison. I PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT SOR GROUPSAFFECTED: Waterand Sewer Department, Utility Department, Citizens o Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue and Bond funds for Water Account 1'620-081-0481-R311- 9114 with a balance of $578,441.39 and Sewer Account #673-082-RB93-V310-9114 with a balance of $204,354.00. Resp tfully nu tted: C1 yd . Harre City Manager Approved: I I ~--I/1--tJ~J (;v Name: De se arpool Title: Senior Buyer MAGMA Y r a I B115 # 5 J ' BID NAME KINGS ROW WATER & SEWER DICKERSON LINDER- E.L. DALTON CIRCLE C JAGOE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CONST. STAHL CONST. PUBLIC OPEN DA.T I JULY 7, 1994 CONST v ~rn~ w OTY DESCRIPTION 1. INGS ROW AREA WATERLINE $337,450.00 $412,611.00 $513,073.00 $318,010.00 $302,512.00 REPLACEMENT i 2. UISACH STREET WATERLINE $59,642.00 $78,151.00 $96,092.00 $58,182.00 $73,675.00 3., YELLOWSTONE DR. SANITARY $238,637.00 $191,179.00 $462,713.00 $290,414.00 $188,354.00 j SEWER f 1 TOTAL BID PRICE $635,629.00 $681,941.00 $1,071,878.00 $664,606.00 $564,641.00 BOND YES YES YES YES YES f 1 . f k ~pendaNo. ~4getldaIt ~b 'a r s . sgen0a No ~ ~ AgeNalte Date y- - s~~6 July 19, 1994 CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager IMPROVEMENT SUBJfiCI: PROJECT DID OPENING NO. RON AREA WATER O AND R S 8CAPITAL 9~IS R UTILITY KINGS IMPROVEbO WS . RECOMDS827JJATION: The Utility Staff and the Public Works Engineering K Department recommend award of the contract to Jagoe Public Company of . Kings f Row t Area amount Water and Sewer BUtility Improvements SUMMY s j Bids were opened July 7, 1994, with a total participation of six bidders. Jagoe Public Company of Denton, Texas, is the lowest qualified bidder. Jagoe Public's bid is $302,512.00 for K!ags Row area waterline replacement, $57,382.00 for Huisache Street waterline and $188,354.00 for Yellowstone Drive sanitary sewer for a total bid of $548,248.00. The bid is approximately $51,076.00 over the construction budget and $19,293.00 over the engineer's estimate. The Yellowstone Drive sanitary sewer project is the primary contributor to the bid coming in over budget. The design and construction of this project requires that the sewerline must maneuver around dual (parallel) 42" storm drainage culverts that run in the same location. This unique construction will cost approximately $56,000 more than if a fiscal Impact e Statment e and the tical etails can e be i found was ino the Fiscal installed. d Fund Analysis. } The bid does not include asphalt patching. The Engineering and Transportation Department will perform this service for a price of $2.00 per square foot of patch. The area to be patched will be determined after the contractor has completed work. The estimate for patching is $78,000. 3 +gendaNo 11'6 =2- latv '/yn~ Page 2 49kk BACKGROUND: Kings Row Area Water and Sewer Improvements is a culmination of several water and sewer projects that are regionally compatible for incorporating into one large project. The water replacement portion of the project consists of several lines on or near Kings Row Street. These streets have been a continual maintenance problem for a number of years and over the long term it is more cost effective to replace the deteriorated lines than to continue making repairs. Yellowstone Drive has been identified as the roadway in the Kings Row area that is needing additional sewerline installation to alleviate sewage backup that is occurring in the area during wet weather conditions. This new interceptor line will increase capacity and improve system integrity in the area. FISCAL IWACTs $375,000 is budgeted for construction in revenue funds for the water portion of the project. The Stonegate Drive waterline project is $93,421.50 under budget. This is a revenue fund that can be allocated to the Kings Row waterline project. By doing so the project comes in $78,315.50 under budget including asphalt patching. $107,000 is budgeted for construction in bond funds for the sewer portion of the project. There is currently $295,000 budgeted for the replacement of the Corinth forcemain. Since the CIP was prepared, Corinth has agreed to reroute their sewage so the forcemain upgrade is no lonrer necessary. Portions of this money has been allocated to other sewer projects (University Drive sewer, Cooper Creek J sewer, Hickory Creek sewer) and the remaining budget will be allocated to Yellowstone sewer. This will bring the project in at $8,221.00 under budget including asphalt patching. (See Exhibit V, Fund Analysis for more detail.) AGENCIES AFFLCTEDi The citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, the City of Denton, Engineering and Transportation Department and Jagoe Public Company. 4V11to tfully e b itted, . . Har rell, City nager I I , t 's ~QiAd~ NG.., AgBnGoltIM 0810 Page 3 7,rJ :2b Prepared by: Lee K. Allison, Director, Water Engineering & operations Approved by: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director } Department of Utilities F &chibit I Location Map Exhibit II Project Considerations Exhibit III Hid Summary Exhibit IV Letter of Recommendation Exhibit V Fund Analysis Exhibit VI CIP Detail Sheet a } f i j ~ i i , 1JA024.CC F y: . ~QodaNo - 4ge,~dalSer2 PERSNING JUNO LN. DIP JUNO 1 F (e W!!! z C P~LL~~ O z 7 a ¢ r s z vzi z IE'RCULES = HERCULES ¢ Y } J C~ (SUN VALLEY RETAMA W ~yF~ HILTON1v •C~~ YUCCA HER H h ¢ i rpN PL ~J' > " - - I L i ` ~ W ~ ~ IMPFRA~ ~ ROW a. ►N+ y O ~ LAW.MA ~Zzo N 9R_ x o SIS:RRA k a ~.-J _ MANHATTEN DOVE V7 a Z6RR~ a RCNI a WOLF RAP DR. A,4~ CSR. WINDSOR lob EXHIBIT 1 19933 REPT E 6 & 8" WATER LIMES AVON, HEATHER, HUISACHE, KINGS ROW, STRATFOPJ) - op l~'1-r~ 0 DRAWN BY: DANffi: BRONN CIP 94-046106 ~ DATE: 12-O'a3 SCAM.; e-=so ~i. 1.-- pERsHlt4G rjale %7 Dip JUNO~~ ~ ~ C3 f a o r ! 3 ¢ u I Z W W F ¢ Y V) i HERCULES ERCULES LL G to SUN VALLEY Z 0~~ 9dr 9 3 RETAMA HILTON =YUCCA 11 A ~9r~ti VAERA ~ ❑ N = ¢ z STON PL. f+ 1 " H u N V > 1 ~ Q Q YMPw'RiA6 ~ IN Row N V1 H LAGUNA d O PS U~ O` r _ lLr SIERRA F-- rmr _ ¢ ~ f t a p° r MANHATTEN DOVE j MRRY ;.J MCi w a WOLF RAP DR. RCSRiLL WINDSOR c EXHOT i ~~1u 1993 REPLACE 8" & S" WATER LINES AVON, HEATHER, HUMACHE, laNGS ROW, STRATFORD r_ klV DRAI►Y BY: dANQ3I: 8R0NN CfI' 94 DATE: 12-30-83 SI=' 1~= YUCCA an I \ ~SHERA ~~N 9~'\ A = z ~ ~ TdN PL. ~J' ~ H N Ll~ a u w IMPERIAL DR. A N r Z KINGS ROW _ `,L nQ ~ LAGUNA a5 L SIERRA ,~t~ ~ a ALE a y ANHATTEN w ~ RRY CY M ~ DO O~~ a 2 z G~~` a wOLFTRAP DR. EDAR HIL a. `'"NC)S`~R wi ~'"BERG W uEBONN 0 S4,Q 6~ I1! ~ wlu~sw~P ~ ~o ~y s w 1~LD z MEADOW- y~2 R r i „ B I ~HTW00 g 3 BROOK SIR { ,D~IF 001[ TRAIL. J CVti5HOLM TRAIL JJJ EM RSA u Z W Cr' CDRDOVA z~ CLt1VEIF LN. z~ LIVE OAK 3v o a CRE TOAe W # CORONADO DR, JJ W 17 ! u 1 i i 1993 UPGRADE 12" & 15" WATER LINES: yM,LORS ONE DRAKN AY: DAND3tiDRO1fN C1P/ 94-a491SiQ DA~TBs~D-9~-~6 94 SCAM L~B~~ A~,S fYU C CA } SHERA tN• _ z TON~PL\~ J` a u w IMPERIAL DR. y _ 2, KINGS R014V L LAGUNA - G cy- SIERRA 5 E~ Q ~ ood a a p0 ANHATTEN Y F- RRY ww (n M J O~~ O A 2 I = a WOLFTRAP DR. EDAR NIL r glNDSOR fdtHs UEBONN pOQ SQ~P WIIJOSWE,P~ F, ty ~ N ~ ►I[,~F1 LD zo MEADOW- 0 C 3 BROOK ,SIR BRIGHTWOO •,.Da4FNOE7II TRAIL. ~ CµISNOLM TRAIL EM ERSO CaRO ovA W CLOVEN LN E zr- LIVE OAK pA ~U A O A 7 O CORONADO DR. CRESTDAe = x +w u 1993 UPGRADE 12" & 16' WATER LINES YELLOWSTONE DATE: 03 i DPAAI N BY: DANIBL.BROWN CEP/ 4 0471810 -1b- 94 SCAM- 1~=8~~ r F ipevaNo AgeRdaltEtn~ 7 oete u PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS KINGS ROW AREA WATER AND SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0 Waterlines in the area are in poor condition and have become a continual maintenance problem. • The existing sewerline is near capacity during dry weather conditions and surcharges during wet weather conditions. The new line will eliminate sewage backup on the existing line. • The waterline project is $30,117 over budget due to increases in asphalt patching. f • The Stonegate waterline project is $93,421.50 under budget i and this fund can be used to supplement the Kings Row waterline project. • The sewerline project is $94,634.00 over budget due to j asphalt patching, extensive design work and unique construction needed to avoid the large storm drainage culverts in the area. r s The Corinth forcemain project has been eliminated. Therefore,, $102,855 of the funds for that project can be the Yellowstone sewer project. used to finance ~ i J , i I I r i F 3 tu024Arp a i EXHIBfr 0 P • a k 4 BID OPENING #1650 gendANo. JULY 7, 1994 Nodal Gate ~wet BID SUM MARY KINGS ROW WATER & SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ITEM CONTRACTOR/ KINGS ROW NO. OFFICE UTILITIES DAYS BOND 1 JAGOE PUBLIC $548,248.00 120 YES DENTON, TX M 2 DICKERSON CONST, $635,629.00 120 YES DENTON,TX 3 CIRCLE C CONST. $66406.00 120 YES I FT WORTH, TX 4 CINDER-STAHL CONST. $681,941.00 120 YES FT WORTH, TX 5 E.L. DALTON & CO. $1,071,878.00 120 YES DALLAS, TX i M A. r I ~ I EXHPAT III t r i°i1 Ir .i. b` w AgendaNo. -3 AgWall $ Dente _ • CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 HEHORANDUH DATE: July 11, 1994 s TO: John Atkins, Engineering Associate FROH: David Salmon, P.E., senior civil Engineer SUBJECT: Kings Row area Water and Sewer Utility Improvements I Bids were opened for the above referenced project on July 7th, 1994. The low bidder was Jagoe Public with a total bid of $548,248.00. You will note that this is less than the total bid price of $564,541.00 which was presented at the bid opening. The 9 error occurred in the Huisache Street Waterline bid. If you multiply all the quantities and unit prices and then add them, the total is the lesser amount. As our contract is a "unit pricem j { contract, the lower price would apply. We have notified the contractor and purchasing department of this error. It appears that the error occurred in adding the item totals. The contractor has acknowledged the error and has verbally agreed to the corrected total. Our estimate for construction of this project was $529,046, which is only about 3 1/2% low. The difforenc:e may be explained by the fact that local contractors are exceptionally busy due to tho increase in private work. Jagoe Pu,olio has installed many utility projects for the City of Denton with excellent results. I recommend that Jagoe Public's bid be accepted with the noted correction. David Sal on AEE003E6 I 8171666.8200 DIFW METRO 434.2529 F.XMBIT N a KINGS ROW WATER & SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FUND ANALYSIS ~genda;lo 'f~r2?a~ RgenOallem..~.~ (WATER) [Dale ~ r IS Z~ KINGS ROW %ATERUNE & HUISACHE ST. WATERLINE CIP (1993 REPL MISC. WATERLINES) ACTUAL/ DE.$ORIPTION BUDGET ESTIINATE ENGINEERING DESIGN $15,000.00 $11,104.00 ACT SURVEY 5,1.4,OG0.00 $1,119.00 ACT INSPECTION $10,000.00 $10,000.00 EST ASPHALT INCLUDED IN CONSTRUCTION $02,000.00 EST CONSTRUCTTO(J SM1894.00 894 1p TOTAL _ f $414,000.00 $444,117.00 HOVERULINDER B STONEGATE ALLOCATED TO KINGS ROW WATER $93,421,50 EVISED (OVER)/UNJER RUDGE? $63.304.50 NOTE: (1) STONEGATE WATERLINE REPLACEMENT IS A REVENUE FUNDED PROJECT THAT IS $93,421.50 UNDER BUDGET. THIS FUND CAN BE USED TO 1 FINANCE THE REMAINING KINGS ROW PROJECT. (2) THE PROJECT WAS BUDGETED FOR ASPHALT AT $1/SF. SINCE THEN THE ASPHALT PRICE HAS BEEN INCREASED TO $2/SF (JULY, 1993). THEREFORE, THE BUDGET DOES NOT REFLECT *rHE INCREASE OF $31,000 IN ASPHALT CHAFIGES. EXHIBIT V t r KINGS ROW WATER & SEWER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FUND ANALYSIS ~gaN aNo q_qoU_ Agandaltem 7 {SEWER] Oats YELLOWSTONE SEWER ~yoa76 CIP (1993 UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR) ACTUAL/ DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATE ENGINEERING DESIGN $7,000.00 $5,950.00 ACT SURVEY $3,000.00 $1,330.00 ACT INSPECTION $8,000.00 $6,000.00 EST ASPHALT INCLUDED IN CONSTRUCTION $16,000.00 EST CONSTRUCTION $107 000 $188,354.00 BID TOTAL $125,000.00 $219,634.00 (OVER)/UNDER BUDGET ($94.634.00) CORINTH FORCEMAIN ALLOCATED TO YELLOWSTONE $102,855.00 [REVISED (OVERVUNDER BUDGET $8,221-00 NOTE: (1) THE CORINTH FORCEMAIN PROJECT WAS CANCELLED LEAVING $295,000 TO ALLOCATE TO OTHER PROJECTS. USTED BELOW ARE THOSE PROJECTS. G COR4'NTH FORCEMAJN PROJECT $295,000.00 ALLOCATED TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE $140,516.00 COOPER CREEK $23,758.00 HICKORY CREEK $22,871.00 BUDGET REMAINING FOR YELLOWSTONE $102,655.00 1 (2) THE PROJECT WAS BUDGETED FOR ASPHALT AT $I/SF. SINCE THEN THE ASPHALT PRICE HAS BEEN INCREASED TO 1 $218F (JULY, 1993). THEREFORE, THE BUDGET DOES NOT REFLECT THE INCREASE OF $6,000 IN ASPHALT CHARGES. - - - - venom PROJ TITLE: (R) (1993) REPL. MISC. WATERLINES ~g8f1d31(N ESTIMATED COST: $414 (x 1000) >1ta ?mow DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorating waterlines. GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 Stratford-Sherman to Wellington WON 800 LF S 48,000 Heather-Stratford to Avon 216' 1,600 LF S 96,000 Avon-Stratford to Heather 216' WA LF S 18,000 Mngs Fl-StuaR to Sherman 618• 2,050 L $13?0,000 Kings Row-Stuan rt to to Sherman 616, Total 6,450 LF $414,000 PURPOSE: Save on maintenance and repair costs and Improve system integrity. Survey $14,000 COST Engineering $15,000 CALCULATION: inspection $10000 Conetructlon Total 5376.000 $414,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES on Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC JXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 ; ~ D A ~ M ~ J F M 386-. 38$ `~j J A S ' 1995 0 N D J F f A M J M , 1996 O N D J A M A s ENCUMBRANCES CASH EXPENOITUREIV. r BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER' TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $385 $0 so 1386 50 5388 $0 $0:. :388 TOTAL 2ND YR s0 :0 $0 So $0 50 $0' S0 $0: $0: TOTAL 3R0 YR $0. 50 50 50 $0 50 50 50 $0= 50, GRAND TOTAL $0 $385 s0 50 $385 $0 $385 5o 50= s886- 94CUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT ObJect 0 Survey 3193 $14 8163 Engineering, Dasl¢t 3193 $10 11 8182 8660 I =4 Construction 1 Construction y 444- $978 9114 I ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $414 COMMENTS: This to a melt s prr 0 In 1993 Ertan+berutoes Pnor t09~ 529,000 Total Project BtrdQatCtxrant CIP ~,0 0 + 3118183 9:21 P EXFNEi r Vl i r r° 94-0471E PROJ TITLE: (1) (5993) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR agenda q . ESTIMATED COST: a630 (x 1000) raatc 7--/ -Q y DESCRIPTION: GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 / G af26 Corinth Force Main Lift Station to Interceptor 8112 5,400 LF 00 0 Chisholm Trail Area Cordova to Stuart $295'00 TOTAL Yellowstone tongs Row Io Monterey N6116, A/1121 12,580 LF S125:00IM LF i 9,580 $660,000 PURPOSE. To Increase Capacity of the interceptor and prevent sewage backup Into the surrounding area. COST Design Estimate $ 55,000 CALCULATION: Conatrucdort Estimate $695.000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTB:CASH FLOWMCUMBERANCES on Wars x 1000) ENC EXP END EXP ENO EXP END EXP ENO EXP ENO W 1994 0 N 0 270 135 J F M 13 A M ; J 325 ; 160 J A' 18; 1995 0 N D F M A M J ; A ; S ' 1998 0 N A M D J P M J J ; A ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES: r BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV EXPO DI7SIORTHHER TOT'A i TOTAL 1 ST YR $595 $s SO $o $695 $05 $0 $0 $0. $595 TOTAL ?ND" $0 $0. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 S0: SO TOTA43WYR $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $d; $0 GRAND TOTAL 5695- $o. $0 $0 $m $595 SO so $0: i696 EHCUMBERANCE DATES EnmmtwW ae spell, PHARE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT 0 i t General ftmhaoe { EnghloftV Design 3193 $65 868E18683 In"Wiledon •3184 $40 8682 F Constvcdon 9194 5555 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $650 COMMENTS: Thfe Is =P%18Q4 g In 1993, Opp Total Project M I"Cuff"CiP $5%000 5860.000 3115/9313:33 AwdaND Ageadaltem Cale-7-- ~ 70f 216 DATE: JULY 19, 1994 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrah, City Manager SUBJECT: BID; 1651 - STONEGATE 8" WATERLINE RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder H & H Plumbing and Ut lilies, in the total amount of $188,581.00. SUMMARY: This bid Is for all labor and materials in replacement of the Stonegate Drive 8" Waterline. This waterline has had a history of maintenance problems and Is being replace prior to replacement of the existing street. Eight bid proposals were received, in response to thirty-eight notice to bidders being mailed out. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Utility Department recommendation. PROGIUMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water Department, Utilitles Department, Utility Customers o the City o Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetod Revenue Fun's for 1994 Account 1620-081-0481-R308- 9114 with a h~slance of $518,441.39. Res fully su tted: \47(olcl V. Harre City Manager Approved: Name: Denise Ha Title: Senior Buyer soe.eae~ R . Y y Y i ID# ~B TE 8' WATERLINE DICKERSON LINDER- E.L. CIRCLE C RADICH BID NAME STONEGA CONST. STAHL DALTON CONST CONST OPEN DATE JULY 7, 1994 CONST. --VEND-ow- VEA~ZSt~_. # VENDOR--- TOTAL BID PRICE $228,625.50 $297,875.30 $326,560.00 $269,340.00 $269,874.00 BOND YES YES YES YES YES ! a E { 1651 i MID STATES JAGOE H & H BID NAME STONEGATE 6' WATERLINE UTILITY PUBLIC ~ UUTILIT MUMI G ` OPEN DATE JULY 7 1994 i TOTAL BID PRICE $246,081.60 $208,333.00 $188,681.00 BOND I YES YES YES I i I i I"ONO } AQ"lt j no ' z6. r ` p VmdaNo D to dais' / ~ Mdtl% July 19, 1994 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDER BID OPENING N0. 1651 FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STONEGATE DRIVE NA'"BRLINB REPLACEMENT RECOMMBNDATIONs The Utility Staff and the Public Works Engineering Department recommend award of the contract to H & H Plumbing & Utility for the amount of $188,581.00 for the construction of Stonegate Drive Waterlinr: Replacement. SUMMARY: Bids were opened July 7, 1994, with a total participation of 8 bidders. H & H Plumbing & Utility of Garland, Tx., is the lowest qualified bidder. H & H Plumbing & Utility's bid is $188,578.50 for the 8" waterline replacement. The bid is approximately $93,421.50 under budget (including the estimate charge for asphalt patching and $2,310.25 under the engineer's e estimate. The bid does not include asphalt patching. The Engineering and Transportation Department will perform this service for $2.00 per square foot of patch. The area to be patched will be determined after the contractor has completed work. The estimate for patching is $41,000. s BACRGROUNDt Stonegate Drive is part of the replace waterline street program. In this program, waterlines which have had a history of maintenance problems are replaced prior to the replacement of the existing street. This helps insure test the new pavement will not have to be excavated to do maintenance. r AGENCIES AFFECTEDt The Citizens of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, The City of Denton Engineering and Transportation Department and H & H Plumbing and Utility. J I C t 3 1 veodaNo AgendMOM We. 7`" Page 2 2U+ ~y/~1 L FISCAL IMPACTt $323,000 is budgeted in revenue funds for construction in FY 94. See Exhibit V (Fund Analysis) for more deta esp full itted, Lloyd Harrell, City ager Prepared by: Lee Allison, Director Water Engineering & Operations r Approved by: R. E. Nelson, Executive Director Department of Utilities l I Exhibit I Location Map Exhibit II Project Considerations Exhibit III Bid Summary Exhibit IV Letter of Recommendation Exhibit V Fund Analysis Exhibit VI CIP Detail Sheet i IJAMICC A i -f ll 111 A/- RS-4754 \ A c o RR~G~ G,`~~O r r~l ~P yo cpUCy~Rp pk SP~ G hrilC CAMOO GP4, ~Fkiti T J / O 0 _ O -f O J O 3 I pia WNWR~Y hQ~~ w C LYNHURST LANE LYNHURST IANE a SKYLARK DRIVE = " GATEINOOD DROVE. ~ EXHW I s 1993 REPLACE 6" WATER LINE (STREET) r: STONEGATE , DRAWN HY: DANIEL rROAN CD?O 94-04SLE05 DATE: OL-03-94 scmx L~400 - g 7 -q~ 0 dX4Q lo -O Cq ~ ~0 i o RRgc,Rr ,PG~~ yp!! C~~C'ygRO pk ~PC~ CAMDO G~aLC~ GP's CF~~ti J / Q J J 0 } ` CR p. pQ`' V V FST oz "0t~ rNfLC RIVE Y z .Q v LYNHURST LANE LYNHURST LANE r SKYLARK DRIVE a GATEW000 DRIVE. ¢ v V EXHIBIT I ~~1993 REPLACE 8" WATER LINE (STREET) } STOMEGATE DRAWN BY. DAM, BROWN CIPI 94-046LE05 DATE: 01-03--94 SCAUU: 1:"W i i r k S INC pq PROJECT CONSIDERATIO0 .STONEGATE WATEIU41NE REPLACEMENT • The Street Department will be repaving Stonegate Drive. Replacing the existing waterline will insure that the new pavement will not have to be excavated to perform maintenance. • The existing waterline is in poor condition and would have to be replaced soon, even if the street was not being paved. • The project is within budget. I I 1 k 1 ~ J 4. VAMA y r" E f s gen4aNo BID OPENING #1651 ~geadaltefit~--s n)_ JULY 7, 1994 gate `r^r BID SUMMARY aA STONEGATE WATERLINE ITEM CONTRACTOR/ STON WATER EGATE DAYS BOND NO. OFFICE i H&H PLUMBING & UTIL. $188,578.50 60 YES GARLAND, TX 2 JAGOE PUBLIC $208,333.00 60 YES DENTON, TX 3 DICKERSON CONST. $228,525.50 60 YES DENTON, TX 4 MID STATES UTILITY $246,081.50 60 YES WACO, TX 5 CIRCLE C CONST. $2629017.00 60 YES FT WORTH, TX 6 RADICH CONST. $269,974.00 60 YES LILLIAN, TX 1 } 7 CINDER-STAHL CONST. $2979876.30 60 YES ' FT WORTH, TX 8 E.L. DALTON & CO. $325,660.00 60 YES DALLAS, TX EXHIBIT III . y gsndaNo agendaltem late Q a CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 12, 1994 To: John Atkins, Engineerinq Associate FROM: David Salmon, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Stonegate waterline i, Bids were opened on the above mentioned project on July 7, 1994. the low bidder was H and H Plumbing and Utility at $188,581. Our estimate for construction was $190,889. It appears that their bid price is reasonable. The bids were checked and were found accurate and complete. We have not received a list of references yet but will check then as soon as a list is obtained. I recommend e refereeea turn up and Utilities bid be accepted as long a c positive. David S lmon AEE003E6 , 8171568-8200 D/FW METRO 434-2529 EXHOT N s> a, e,4. i ,gantlaNO C~C~''~~ ~pe~~tla~tem Tafe ^ 2-b CITY eI DENT01% TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON. TEXAS 76201 HEHORANDUH DATE: July 12, 1994 TO: John Atkins, Engineering Associate FROM: David Salmon, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Stonegate Waterline E Sills were opened on tiie above mentioned project on July 7, 1994. i the low bidder was H and H Plumbing and Utility at $188,561. our estimate for construction was $190,889. It appears that their bid price is reasonable. The bids were chocked and were found accurate and complete. We have not received a list of references yet but will check then e as soon as a list is obtained. I recommend that H and H Plumbing and Utilities bid be accepted as long as references turn up 6 ! 'k positive. David cl~z P .EE003 E6 f s 8171566.8200 D/f W METRO 434.2528 IXHBrr I 1 a~~ k ~endaNo STONEGATE WATERLINE %geadatita,. U- - FUND ANALYSIS >3teg'gy I . ACTUAL/ DESCRIPTION BUDGET ESTIMATE ENGINEERING DESIGN $13,000.00 $11,973.00 ACT SURVEY $11,000.00 $6,647.00 ACT INSPECTION $9,000.00 $9,000.00 EST i ASPHALT INCLUDED IN CONSTRUCTION $41,000.00 EST r CONSTP.UCTION 5323.000.00 $188.578.50 TOTAL $358,000.00 $257,198.50 y VER DEN IUDGIET .801.50 i i k I EXHOT V I 4 r r - r p1 f?gc: Agelldalte S ~b o$2,G CE'nCn;PT'CN: 3lonegale-.-13 : Scumncce c5.:.0 ;URPOSE. Avoid oatcning or recentiv recavco cr cverza sweets cy rac,aane waterline with a surficient creaK rostra Fnor ro the rehabilitation of the street. COST Survey S 11.000 i CALCULATION: Engineering $ 13,000 Inspection as 9,000 Construction ~ $323.000 Total m $356.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS;CASH FLCWSlelCUMBERANCES tln Dollars x 10001 ENO EXP ENO -:XP ENC SEV ENO _rXP EHC EXP ENC EXP i, 1994 0 N D J r M 332 166 A~ A 14 J 166 J A S ; r 1995 0 ; N 0 ; J F M A M J J A a 1996 0 N D J F M ; A. M J J A S' ; ~ ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES. BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHEIR TOTAL k•TOTAL 1STYR $0 5332 So so S333 $0 $332 $0 so 5332 } OTAL 2ND YR $0. s0 s0 s0 s0 $0 s0 s0 so $9 dTALSAD YIN $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 s0. s0 GPANO TOTAL $0 s332 s0 s0 S332 $0 S332 $0 s0 $332 ~ ENCUMBERANCEDATES: PRASE GATE AMOL!IT OBJECT IF r . SUN" 1193 3'11 8653 EC4 Osltipn City 1193 i 13 86W Inveedw city 1194 $19 8582 K, . Conmaon 1194 $323 9114 Mlacakneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL 5356 'COMMENTS: This is a multtyeer pprropject DegMing to 1993. :i Enaanbemtces; Print to 1994 824.000 'r TOW Protect Bt dget 5358 400 EXHIBIT VI •18193 6:40 Pg 15 ti~w r+ Y.~ ♦.....r.~ ~V Wr.~.~.. r.. ~.\w.w~I.w~Y, Y. ~ .~.Y • • . r f 1 Q6fI a 0. R1(~cQg.=.=_.._.;,;,.=_. ~geaflaitem S 7 7SSC-nIPTiC?.: SIonegate urnncce -URPOSE. Avoid patcnrng or recentiv recaveo cr o•reria,a strews mr recta waterline with a surticient oreaK nistori crior to the reheDilitauon or the street. COST Survey = S 11.000 CALCULATION: Engineenng a S 13.000 Inspemon = $ 9,000 Consmtonon -$323-000 l Total = $356.000 a ! FUNDING REOUIFtFVENTS;CASH F;AWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 10001 ENC EXP FNC VP ENO SE{P ENC _XP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N 0 J r M 332 166 A M J 166 J A 3 ; r ` 1995 O N 0 J F M ; 1 A M J J A 1998 0 N 0 t J F M ; i M J J A ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES. BOND REV A1C OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL ?TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 5332 SO SO $332 $O $332 SO SO $332. TOTAL 2N0 YR 50 $0 SO s0 $0 SO $0 $0 50 $11- SAD AL Y14 $0 SO SO 0 SO SO $0 s0 $0. i0 ORANO TOTAL 0 5332 SO SO $332 S0 5332 5o so $332 < ENCUMBERANCE DATES. PHASE DATE AMOLNT OBJECT III € St.YVey 1193 $11 8863 Er1q. 0430 C11y 1193 St13 8380 inapep m city 1194 9 8662 F K, . Consuuc!lon 1194 5323 9114 ~ MiaceUatle~ws r•ENCUMSERANCETOTAL 5356 (COMMENTS: YNa is a rnultlyear protect be9tnnrng in 1993. t !r r Pr1or 1019994 $ 24.E Total Project Budget $356.000 ~ . ~i8193 8:40 _ Pg 15 E.XHUT A X ITY~- - COUNCI l A' ~ t ' ~ 0 Q 4 t `~ddj Ct d O 4+0 M t `►►0~ .k AgeadaNo 9~-0 geodalt Date ORDINANCE NO. 7 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF F'UN')S FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AVO PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, state law and ordinance require that certain contracts requiring an expenditure or payment by the City in an amount exceeding $15,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public health or safety of the citizens of the city, or in case of unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended to the City Council that it is necessary to purchase goods or services due to the following emergency conditions outlined in the memorandum attached hereto as Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by references NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public calamity that makes it necessary to act at once to appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the property of the city, or to protect the public health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment, and by reason thereof, the following emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE AMOUNT ORDER NUMBER VENDOR 45953 DARR EQUIPMENT $190215.00 t 3 SECTION II. That because of such rinergency, the City Manager s or designated employed Is hereby authorized to purchase the II thdescribed in the materials, equipment, supplies or services as erefore in the attached Purchase Orders and to make payment amounts there in stated, such emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids. .r: } ~gendaNa. ~ AgWaltem gate y ~ o SECTION 111. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. BOB CASTLEBERRYr MAYOR ATTEST; ' JENNIFER WALTERSr CITY SECRETARY BY; APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY j + BY; _ i j i t t p; t +S I 1 VendaNo Agendaltem 9 ' Date DATE: JULY 19, 1994 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER # 45953 - DARR EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase order to Darr Equipment, in the amount of =19,215.00,be approved. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the repair of a Caterpillar 623E 23 yard I Scraper, used at the landfill in covering stock piles. Work on this unit will include repair and rebuilding the engine. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #45953 PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Fleet Services, Land Till/ Community Services, Utility Customers of the City of Denton. FISCAL IMPACT: Fleet Services Working Capital Account #710-025-0582-8701 with a balance of ?932968.91. i I 4sp ully submitted: Harre ll City Manager Approved: 1 L1 v~/y~ Div ' Name: Denise Harpool Title: Senior Buyer sw.~aaaA z r I i ti 1 THIS IS A xxx { PURCHASE ORDER NO: 45953 CONFIRMING ORDFR -CIS number muss appear on all Q {IF invoices. delivery shpslips. . cases. DO NOT DUPLICATE -----j ctns.. boxes, packing sups and bills. Dote: 07 11 94 Page No 01 Req. No: Bid No: ) j ~O ~g d~aNo. ~i CITY OF DENTON TEXAS Aordals 716 :1 90 1-8 TEXAS . DIV PURC8171383 71100 01FW METRO 8171287-0042 NTON4 FAX 817 382-45192 354 0700/ aaie_...w_ ' i IENOOR DARR EQUIPMENT CO DELIVERY CONFIRMATION ONLY C14 4 NAME/ p 0 Box 20737 ADDRESS FLEET SERVICES j ADDRESS 804 TEXAS DALLAS Tx 75220 DENTON, Tx 76201 ' SUY£R TS TERMS VENDOR NO. DAR49000 DELIVERY QUOTED 07 30 94 F03 DESTINATION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT S RIPTI~ 1 NFG MANE 1.000 19,215.00 001 19215.00 $S VENDOR CAT. 1 M A CITY 1 92935 RIO 11960 R G R ENGINE UNIT i i I 7 ' P GE TOTAL s 19,215.00 OR ND TOTAL s 19,215.00 8710 19,215.00 01 710 025 0580 j 1 N ..n... 1. sendM xi0wf willmCTIONfi eltineti prepaid r~i....ronwu .r.o+•.el 3 4. Shipping Terms pping instructions: Net 39 No federal tr State safes 'u p, oi 1 Se invoke with dep3icY.e espy. 'shell be to included irq iwvon L bill t+' 715 'McKinney St in prices billed, n...sr y,tml•u4k PIIRCHASINf, . r: i If r COUNGI ~ +t a 0 O ` + r +CT' G 1 AC9100 AQOV4 9 _ ► J Date 1 r I ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING PURCHASE OF r N A CONTRACT FOR THE SERVICES;! PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDSTHEREFORS) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive sealed proposals for the Services incaccordanconwithst he materials, equipment, supplies or procedures of state law and City ordinances; and the City Massager or a designated employee has osals are WHEREAS, reviewed and recommended that r0thed materialsl,ropquipment, sals he for the best responsible propo supplies or services as shown in the "Proposals" submitted therefor; and for WHEASt the Cy Council hbe Useddfori thethepurchaCity of the { the apprpriation of funds to ui ment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; materials, NOW, e, THEREFORE# ! THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the numbered l ie'ss oin the following r services, sh n in the as bids lrials, equipment, PP tad and approved 'eby accepted "Propoosasals" attached hereto, are he• for such Items' being the best responsible proposal t RFSP ITEM AMOUNT NUMBER No. VENDOR ALL AUTO-GRAPHICS INC. $55,250.00 1644 SECTION 11. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted proposals, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the proposals for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance w;.th the terms, specifications, standards, quantities and for the specified sums contained in. the Itivitations, Proposals, and related documents. j AQWIND Agendalie. We 7- 2 q5e 4 SECTION 711. I'hat should the City and persona submitting approved and accepted items and of the submitted proposals wish to enter into a formal MTritten agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the proposals the City Manager or his designated represeiLtative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Proposal and related documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by tho acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted proposals, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved proposal or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1994. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR f ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTER, CITY SECRETARY BYt I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: T•FBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I By: i i 7 f /{r9 1 p r i tenda No, Agendaltem +Aie DATE: JULY 19, 1994 3 ~6 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: RFSP # 1644 - RETROSPECTIVE CONVERSION SERVICES RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this request for sealed proposal be awarded to the lowest evaluated vendor, Auto-Graphics Inc., witn a total cost of $55,250.00. SUMMARY: This proposal is for all expenses involved with the conversion of data from card based records of the Denton Public Library to computer equipment and software. This project is to be completed by December 19, 1994. Ten proposals were mailed to prospective vendors, seven responses were received. BACKGROUND: Memorandum/ Evaluation from Eva Poole dated 7-6-94. E PROGRAMS DEPARIWENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Denton Public Library, Library Patrons and Citizens of the City o Denton. F FISCAL IMPACT: Bond funds for Library Aatomatior, Account f451-033-LIBR-9403- 9107 with a balance of $436,016.76. Respe full4subted: 1o d .City Manager Approved: Name: Denise arpoo Title: Senior Buyer 50G A0' M 1 1 ~4G ' t ILI i K. M a ~ P ~gendaNo~ ~ AgendaNe Date _ yOle 6 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: JULY 6, 1994 T0: MBETTY McKEANr UNICIPAL SERVICES &IECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT F70H: EVA POOLE, LIBRARY DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CON'T'RACT FOR RETROSPECTIVE CONVERSION VENDOR The Denton Public Library's automation project will involve a data conversion process which converts the existing data of 113,000 card-based records to a machine readable format for manipulation by an automated system. As with the evaluation process required to select the optimal F computer equipment and software for the library, we also explored various approaches and related costs to prepare and convert data. Our library has three primary types of data which must be i converted. These are: 1. Bibliographic data (one record per library material titles); ~J ~ 2. Patron data (one record per registered patron and/or staff); and 3. Item data (one record per physical library material pipe). Approximately ten (10) retrospective conversion vendors were mailed our Request for Proposal (RFP) for services to complete our conversion project. Please see the attached list for the (even (7) I vendors who chose to respond. i In evaluating these various data conversion vendors, we culled their proposals and talked to librarians from other libraries to discover the following factors: i i i k L M.. i; Y VendaNo 9u'C 3 4gendaltem . rare - ' 2 1. Costs to the libraryt a getup fees and processing charges; • Coats for vendor labor; • Supplies and shipping/handlingi • Database royalties; • special services (authority control, duplicate record elimination, eto.) 2. Timetable necessary to convert the data to machine readable form. 3. Quality of the records resulting from the conversion: accuracy of information; • Completeness; Commonality - adherence to prescribed standards. 6 40 Database maintenance (during the building of the ratabases and once the system is in full operation). With these factors in mind, Auto-Graphics, Inc. became our recommended data conversion vendor who offers a final cost of $58,150.00 with a project completion date of December 19, 1994. on June 30, 1994, the Denton Library Board was presented with our r findings and conounred with our choice with a unanimous vote of the six members in attendance. I therefore recommend that the Auto- ? Graphics, Inc. contract be presented to Council for review and approval. I would be nappy to answer any additional questions. BVA POO EPtjs AM0057C Attachment cot Tom shaw - Purchasing j I DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY RETROSPECTIVE CONVERSION VENDOR COMPARISON AUTO- BRO RETRO-LINK SCRiPT- fTEAf DESCRIPTION AMIGOS GRAPHICS DART EKI OCLC • ASSOCIATES ORJURS RETROSPECTIVE CONVERSTON PROJECT SETUP dt PROFILING 100.00 500.00 1,000.00 1,695.00 ITEMS SEARCHED 39,900.00 44,100.00 43,050.00 66,150.00 73,500.00 46,200.00 TITLES CREATED 9,520.00 4,800.00 4,720.00 5,040.00 5,600.00 3,520.00 SMART BARCODE SETUP FEE 1,500.00 750.00 1,350.00 1,500.00 _).50.00 SMARTBARCODE LABELS 3,577.50 4,050,00 9,450.00 5,670.00 6,750.00 10,800.00 OUTPUT TAFES 70.00 500.00 845.00 253.50 RETROSPECTIVE TOTAL 54,667.50 54,700.00 58,065.00 79,463..E 89,045.00 60,770.00 AUTHORITY OONTROL SERVICES PROFMINO 6t SETUP 250.00 500.00 50.00 500.00 PREPROCMINO & NORMALIZATION 565.00 565.00 LC NAME AUTHORITY PROCESSINO 3,390.00 7,345.00 0.00 E TAPE COPY OF EDITED RECORDS 282.50 595.00 500.00 AUTHORITY CONTROL TOTAL 4,487.50 500.00 1,210.00 7,345.00 500.00 500.00 ! OPTIONAL SERVICES i LC SUWECT AUTHORITY PROCESS 565.00 50.00 PROFESSIONAL MANUAL REVIEW 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TAPE COPY of LC AUTHORITY RECS 0.00 ANNOTATED CARD HEADING PROCEW 0.00 OPTIONAL TOTAL 565.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ORA" TOTAL $9,720.00 55,250.00 59,275.00 96,808.50 N/A 89,545.00 61,270.00 ONOOI'NO COSTS QUARTERLY UPDATE SERVICE 600.00 • This vendor did not comply with minimum specifications June 30, 1994 Agenda Agr.jalt ~e 6 r IC I T Y= ICOUNCI ~ O . ~ s v ON to■ O i i DATE: JULY 19, 1994 40dAd810 'OQlfldelf CITY COUNCIL REPORT T0: Mayor and Members of the City council je FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-94-013, Denton County/Ruddell Street Rezoning RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 6-0. Staff recommends approval without the non-access to Ruddell condition. e M The applicant is requesting rezoning of a 17.9335 acre tract located on the east side of Ruddell Street south of 'k the extension of East Hickory. BACKGROUND: See P&Z Report. Council voted 3-3 on July 5, 1994 to e approve the rezoning without the no access to Ruddell condition. The zoning ordinance was not approved. On July 12th, Council voted to reconsider the zoning ordinance. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR Rnne AFFECTED: Planning and Development. j Building Inspection. Engineering. FISCAL IM2ACT: M N/A. Respectf lly submitted: U Prepared byt Lloy V. Harrell, C Ay Manager Ara dwin, Urban Planner Approvedt Frank H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development mom i li gendaNo Agondalte 7 note 7-193-Y PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT 2 1~ Tos Denton City Council Case No.s Z-94-013 Keating Dates July 5, 1994 GENERAL INFORKATION Applicants County of Denton 110 W. Hickory Denton, Texas 76201 Current Owners Same as applicant Requested Action: Rezone from SF-7 One Family Dwelling District to LI(c) Light Industrial District - Conditioned Location and Sizes 17.9335 acres located on the east side of Ruddell Street south of the extension of East Hickory Street Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: k North - SF-7/Residential l South - MF-1/Vacant !h East - LI(c)/Vacant West - KF-1/Multi-family j Denton Development Plans y j Law Intensity Area I € SPECIAL INFORKATION Transportations ~ Additional dedication along Ruddell will be required to wing the right-of-way to 30 feet from the centerline. A sidewalk will be required at the tire of final plats. ~ i Y +gen0aNo 4gendalte Q- Date (Case z-94-013) Page Two The existing approved access to the property is at East Hickory and Ruddell Street. East Hickory is designated as a collector street, but will not connect through to Woodrow. No driveway will be allowed further south on Ruddell Street. As no access to Ruddell will be taken, improvements to Ruddell Street will not be required at this time. Utilities: Water service will provided from an existing six inch line on Riddell Street. An existing twenty-one inch sewer line at Pecan Creek will provide service to this project. A new manhole will be required to be constructed in order to connect to this line. There is an existing fire hydrant on Ruddell Street. An on- site fire hydrant will be required on Lot 1. Drainage: The floodplain/floodway encroaches on the southern portion of toot 1. The floodway will be dedicated as a drainage easement. Site drainage shall be directed toward the creek. i HISTORY i i The property is currently zoned SF-7 and is vacant. The County of Denton owns the property and plans to construct a vehicle maintenance facility on Lot 1. Future plans include other governmental uses such as office buildings. The preliminary plat for toots 1 and 2, Block 1, Denton County Municipal Project was approved by the City Council on June 21, 1994. This r County property to would the east l of this h tract zoning which approved on the limits use of the property to public buildings for local, state, or federal governments, and professional and administrative offices and correctional facilities with a Specific Use Permit. The proposed zoning for this site would exclude the use of the property as a correctional facility. . a <:r I/ Coo daNo. Age 81R 7 Date "9 el (Case Z-91-013) yp~l8+' Page Three ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area. As the property is owned and will be utilized by governmental agencies only, the policies of the Denton Development Plan will not be applied to this request. In previous cases involving governmental use of property, reference was made to the Texas Attorney General ruling that political subdivisions are immune from the municipal zoning power subject to the application of the rule of reasonableness. The current intensity area would allow up to 900 vehicle trips a day on the tract. The Planning and Zoning Commission is of the opinion that the use of the property in question as governmental uses is reasonable as the property to the east is currently approved for government uses. The Commission also voiced concern over the proposed access to the property at Hickory and Ruddell and the impact the potential traffic could have on the residential neighborhood. The staff and the Commission were uncertain as to the deqree that the rule of reasonableness could be applied to that proposed access and recommended that the City Council consider prohibiting access to Ruddell at any point. Preliminary responses from the County indicate that the "no access" to Ruddell condition recommended by the Planning ant Zoning Commission is not acceptable, but is in a position to dasign the access and parking lot to some future county complex so as to mitigate any negative traffic impacts. While this tract is owned by the County, it is being platted as a separate lot. Council has approved the preliminary plat of two lots. These lots have to have access to some street. A reasonable access would be off Ruddell at Hickory. NOTIFICATION Twelve notices were sent to property owners within 200' of the property in question prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. Ono response was received in opposition to the request. I Agenda No Agendaltem Date '7-/ (Case Z-94-013) /do Page. Four RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Case Z- 94-013 subject to the condition that the permitted uses on the property be limited to public buildings for local, state, federal governments and professional and administrative offices. The Commission also recommends that no access be allowed to Ruddeil Street at any point and that access be frog the County property to the east of this property which has access to McKinney and Woodrow. After review of the case law concerning "the rule of reasonableness" and discussions with the county concerning future access and parking lot layout, staff recommends approval without the access condition. ALTERNATIVES i 1. Approve the petition. 2. Approve the petition with additional conditions. 3. Deny the petition. 4. Postpone action. I j ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of June 22, 1994 t t t i AQeod3No ATTACHMENT 1 AQeidalte Z-94.013 Denton County/Ruddell Street Rezo ng - 6 NORTH raw ~txtr , s~TE Location Map Data 619194 Scala None 1 t Agenda No ATTACHMENT 2 Agendaltem We 7 !c~ Minutes p&Z Commission June 22, 1994 Page 25 recommendations attached. Mrs. Russell: I second. Hr. Englebrecht: I has been moved and seconded to recommend approval of Z-94-007 with 10 conditioned attached. I too would like to say this is not an easy situation, it never is. Dr. Huey: I perceive this also as a very difficulty situation. I see zoning as a protection for residence. I think there are options for the petitioner and I will not vote in favor of the motion. Mr. Engelbrecht: All ed. Wefwilthe l motion? Motion ten minute carries s 5-1. Dr. Huey opposed. break at this time. Meeting resumed at 7:50 P.M. IV. Hold a public hearing and consider the rezoning of a 17.9335 acre tract located on the east side of Ruddell Street south of the extension iecs single-family dwelling (SF 7) to Light Industrial-condi- tioned (LI(c)). Staff Report given by Deborah Goodwin. l This is a request to rezone 17.9335 acres located on Ruddell Street. The commission looked at the plat on the property on June 8, 1994. The city council approved the plat last night at their meeting. I will briefly go over thA infrastructure. There will be additional dedication along Ruddell. A sidewalk would be required at the time of the final plat. Yea may recall that this property is being split into two lots. They will-be final platted separately. Access to the property will be at E. Hickory and Ruddell Street. There will be no driveways allowed further down on Ruddell. The access will be through the existing county property to the east or at Hickory and puddell. The property is currently vacant. Denton County owns the property and plans to construct a vehicle maintenance facility on Lot 1. Future plans for the property include other governmental uses, offices, courts, etc. The zoning that we are proposing on this piece of property is similar to the zoning that was approved on the : R' ~ P P Agendaltem Date 7- Minutes p&Z Commission June 22, 1994 Page 26 county property that is directly east of this property. That particular zoning limits the use of the property to public buildings for local, state, or federal government as and professional sallow correctional facilities with particular property specific use permit. Staff is o ndinTite property is lar use not be allowed on this property. located in the low intensity area Ibut as the propertyTis owned and will be utilized by governmen agency. will not be are to king policies of the Dicula rerequest nt What Plan applied to this part at is basically a reference from the Texas Attorney General. It states that political subdivisions are immune to strict interpretation of the municipal zoning power and we have to use a rule of seasonableness. It is staffs opinion that this would be a reasonable usE for this piece of property. Twelve notices were se in question ty Oowne ne rre poose was feet of the property returned in opposition, one was undeliverable, and I did receive a phone call r and he indicatedtheiwouldoberin owners asking questions and favor of the proposal. I did not reP:eive a written response from that person. Staff would recommend approval of case number 94-017 subject to thee conditionimited to that the be public permitted uses on the property buildings for local, state, and federal governments and for professional and administrative offices. what Mr. Cochran In our c recommendation, can ou state candifederal you mean by publi ;overnments, does that mean garages? Ms. Goodwin: For governmental agency. Ms. Flemming: Could the driveway not come from McKinney St.? Ms. Goodwin: This property does not have frontage on McKinney. I think the county does have plans to have access from the complex that is on Woodrow and McKinney to this piece of property. Mr. Engelbrecht: The facility could be accessed via another route other than the single famil!; residence? 1 Dr. Huey: Does this map include the property we rezoned s A~enda~o q~3 Agendaltern S [bte_ 7-/ Minutes PiZ Commission d~ June 22, 1994 Page 27 the last time? Ms. Goodwin: No. Dr. Huey: Why are we doing this in two steps? Ms. Goodwin: I believe the previous rezoning was a couple of years ago. What we saw the last time was a preliminary plat on the property. I do believe they have an idea where they would place the facility. Mr. Cochran: The property adjacent on the east, is that county property at this time and what is it zoned? Ms. Goodwin: it is zoned U. It has the same uses as we are proposing on this one except it allows correctional facilities with a specific use permit. We are proposing that not be one of the uses allowed on this property. Kr. Engelbrecht: Is the petitioner or a representative present? Michael Jones: I am the Director of Public Works for Denton County. our intention to build a vehicle mainte- nance facility on the property. We do plan right now to have access from McKinney and Woodrow, not from Ruddell. In the future development of the property, potentially there could be a secondary access on Ruddell, but we do not have any plans for that at this time. We do own property from Ruddell to Woodrow and McKinney. We have reviewed the staffs recommendation for conditions and we have no problem with those requirements. We will comply with the requirements in terms of sidewalks construction, etc. Mr. Engelbrecht: What plans do you have to buffer the vehicle maintenance facility from the residential struc- tures that are across Ruddell street. Mr. Jones: The biggest buffer is going to be the space. The proposed site for the vehicle maintenance facility would be in the northeast corner of lot 1. Mr. Cochran: Which way will it face? Mr. Jones: I believe the bays will face east/west. They will open all the way through. 3 I j Agenda No Agendaltem Date ~ -9 Minutes Pit Commission / 0 is/f,Q June 22, 1994 Page 28 Mr. Cochran: What are the proposed working hours? Mr. Jones: It would be normal hours, basically 8-5. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other questions for Mr. Jones? Mr. Cochran: How many bays do you anticipate having? Mr. Jones: I believe there are six bays, three on each side. Mr. Cochran: Do you have the approximat-d dimensions of that structure? Mr. Jones: Approximately 4,000 square feet total. Dr. Huey: What types of vehicles will be worked on? Mr. Jones: All county vehicles. Dr. Huey: Are we talking cars and trucks or earth movers? Mr. Jones: It would be cars and trucks. Our heavy equipment is serviced in our road and bridge operations at some of our other precincts. Mr. Engelbrecht: You are going to be constructing sidewalks along Ruddell and some street work as part of the plat? Mr. Jones: I believe we are going to be required to construct a sidewalk and dedicate right of way. Mr. Engelbrecht: There is currently a fence running along there, do you intend to put up more fence? Mr. Jones: The fence would be in the right of way. We do have plans to fence the facility itself. . Mr. Engelbrecht: Have you talked with the housing authority? Mr. Jones: I don't believe that is an issue we have discussed. Mr. Cochran: You are just developing a.sm4ll portion, what are your +iltimate plans? I Mr. Jones: There is a master plan, some administrative f 4enaam PD aenoallem S zD Minutes Pit Commission t June 22, 1991 0 Page 29 I office, etc, a jail expansion on the property to the east. On this property, the only building that is being con- struction is the vehicle maintenance facility. The rest would be potentially parking and open space. Mr. Cochran: That open space would be maintained as a grassy lawn area? Mr. Jones: That would be a lot of flood plain to the south. Mr. Engelbrecht: What is the purpose of the Hickory St. - Ruddell Street entrance? Mr. Jones: There is the potential of a secondary entrance there. i Mr. Engelbrecht: Personally, I hope that you never use that street. I don't think it is appropriate to access that street. It is a residential area. Dr. Huey: Would it be appropriate and/or legal to put that restriction upon that? Mr. Engelbrecht: I think that in terms of our ability to do that, we could certainly do that. Mr. Robbins: I am not in position to make a legal comment. This is not a cut and dry situation. Our authority is limited with respect to the county. I don't know that we can do that. This is a traditional type of zoning condition. I don't know if it is appropriate or legal. Ms. Russell: Won't this come back to us? Mr. Robbitis: The final plat will cone back to us. Mr. Engelbrecht: Lot two will come back to us and it is on lot two that it Shows the curb cut? Mr. Robbins: Right. There is no curb cut on lot one. Dr. Huey: Would the authorization for a curb cut be at our discretion at that time? Mr. Engelbrecht: In that case I think there is other access to the property. , i j i p ~geneaNa 9 agendai~a Minutes Pit Commission June 22, 1994 Page 30 Hr. Robbins: The problem has to do with an area that is legally sensitive. I don't know how far we can go. Mr. Drake: Any kind of a rule or reason is going to be a gray issue. I don't know what the cases say as far as what the limits of that gray area might be. Mr. Robbins: This is a legally sensitive issue and I can't comment. Mr. Drake: We will have to look into it. Hr. Engelbrecht: I think it is reasonable that we ask you not send office traffic through a residential area. Mr. Morton: In addition, the paperwork says access from Hickory and Ruddell. Mr. Jones: Since we are looking at the property as a whole, we did agree that if we took access through Ruddell, it would only be at the point of E. Hickory and no further south. Mr. Cochran: You are going to build a 4,000 square foot building on a 17 acre plot of land, how close will it be to the east property line? Mr. Jones: it will be in the northeast corner of lot 18 we haven't physically sited the property. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other questions or comments for Mr. Janes? Is there anyone present who would like to speak in favor of this petition? Mary-Hamilton, I an the Executive Director of the Denton Housing Authority. I want to address some concerns about traffic on Ruddell Street. It is my strong feeling that if at any time access is given, Ruddell should be widened and made a more safe area for people. I have to tell you that the Phoenix Apartments are on the east side. There are Goo people living there, approximately 400 of which are children. These children have been taught to be weary of the street, but if a ball rolls into the street, they frequently run into the street. This concerns me. The other issue I would like to address is that we have always been extremely happy to have our public housing project across from a cow pasture. We are probably one of i r +gendaNo 9y-d 4geo Minutes Pit Comvnission Date dalt wv June 22, 1994 3 Page 11 J' the few in the country where our children have been able to grow up with the sight of cattle and green things growing. I would urge the county to voluntarily provide some type of visual buffer for the children. The Pecan Street drainage is another problem. , know if the county will address that or if I shoulddtake that up with the city, something needs to be done on that side of Ruddell to clean that area up also. Mr. Engelbrecht: I have some concerns about the fence, they are going to build a sidewalk there now. I am assuminlk, I know there is a those 400 children. 4 this is important for Ms. Hamilton: The fence has been a thorn in our side for quite sometime. I think there is a need for a fence. previous property owner did not want the fence touched of De thatuthehfence warabsyrboltoftdeflance withnthe cit. we on. He felt- humored him. M s y hope would be the county would tear that i down and erect a fence that would not be In eye sore and would provide protection for the children. Mr. Engelbrecht: Do you spoke with the county?ink a fence is necessary? Have Ms. Hamilton: Not really, I haven't talked to them about that. Probably the fence is more necessary to protect the county building than the children, Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other questions for Ms. Hamilton? Ms. Hamilton: I am sure there are areas on that property that could not be built on. Mr. Engelbrecht: Is there anyone else who would like to speak in favor of this petition? Anyone who would like to speak in opposition to this petition? Leona Franklin: I live at 101 N. Ruddell. concerns have already been addressed, the traffic noise trucks, and construction. The house across the street three from me has already had cars run into the house two or iffer years,dand Iecan simes ee .thishmaking a bi that corner for 25 want to see any additional traffic on ourh street.I Being e, 1t in the corner house, I would catch pure hell. Nobody I r t VndaNo e Agenda Ite gate 2- ¢ Minutes PiZ Commission 14W June 22, 1994 Page 32 wants to live in a house with all of that noise across the way. I get it from Hickory Street and Ruddell Street. I an not opposed to the building, only the traffic. Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other comments? Ms. Franklin: Will I be affected with the sidewalks? Mr. Engelbrecht: The sidewalk will be built along Ruddell on the frontage only, from Hickory Street down to Pecan Creek. Anyone else who would like to speak in opposition to this petition. There was opposition, therefore the petitioner has the opportunity to speak in rebuttal. Mr. Jones: No rebuttal, but I do appreciate the time the commissioners have allowed. It looks like the building will set 350 feet or more off of Ruddell. There is a 100 l foot setback, no structure can be within that. we don't have plans for any other structure, but there is a tremendous amount of set back we have agreed to place on the plat to protect future construction on the site. i Mr. Engelbrecht: Public hearing is closed. Commission- ere, any questions, comments, or a motion? Mrs. Russell: I move for approval of Z-94-0013. Mr. Norton: I second. Mr. Engelbrecht: It has been moved and seconded to approve Z-94-013 as outlined by staff. Dr. Huey: I would like to propose an amendment to the motion that there be no access to property from Ruddell Street, including the E. Hickory access. Ms. Flemming: I second. Mr. Engelbrecht= Any discussion on the amendment? Mrs. Russell: Did I understand we will be discussing lot two at anther time? Mr. Engelbrecht: We will at final plat. Dr. Huey: The staff would need to research the legal issues between our meeting and the city council meeting. ti. r Agenda No Agendalte 02 z0 _ ate Minutes Pit Commission June 22, 1991 O Page » 4URA Mr. Engelbrecht: Any other discussion on the amendment to the motion? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). This brings us back to the main motion with an amendment to close off the curb cut. All in favor? Motion carries unanimously (6-0). V. Consider the preliminary replat of Lot 4F, Block A, Section 2 of the Freeway Park Addition into Lots 4F-1R through 4F-8R. The 8.481 acre site is located on the west side of Mesa Drive at Los Colinas Drive. Staff report by Owen Yost: This is a 8.481 acres site on the west side of Mesa at Los Colinas Drive. Currently it is vacant, but is planned for offices and warehouses. This was reviewed by you back in February, since that time the applicant has distributed a new drainage scheme for the property. We thought it appropriate that you review this replat. The grope-ty is in a light industrial zoning area that allows the proposed uses. The replat does conform to the subdivision and landuse development regulations. The Development Review Committee recommends approval. Mr. Engelbrecht: Questions for Mr. Yost? Mr. Norton: What are we doing again? ~J Mr. Yost: This is a replat of the total acreage. Mr. Norton: Am I suppose to understand all of those lines? Mr. Yost: What they indicate is contours. They are at two foot contour intervals meaning the land slopes two feet for every line shown. Mr. Salmon: on the previous plat, the owner did not propose to change the contour lines to take care of the excess drainage. It was proposed to install an inlet on Mesa Drive and run a storm sewer pipe west toward the railroad ditch. Since thrt time, the applicant has decided to try and handle ache drainage by changing the topography and run more drainage to the west without having to install the pipe. According to our ordinance if you are proposing any major changes in contours, you need to show them on the preliminary plat. 3 f e' i1\wpd0c@\ord\rudd9tr• d a1~0. L Agendalt 7 [ate m 0~le ORDINANCE MO- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM SINGLE FAMILY-7 (SF-7) TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI-c) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION WITH CONDITIONS FOR 17.9335 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF RUDDELL STREET AT $ 5000 FOR VIOLATIONSITHEREOF;HAND PROVIDINGTF R ANxEFF CTI E DA7EF WHEREAS, the County of Denton has applied for a change in zoning for 17.9335 acres nclassifi at on andiuse designation :!.ght industrial (LI-c) district with conditions; and WHEREAS, on une oval 1994 z ning;Ca dission recommended appppr WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFOREg THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: UST10I. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 17.9335 acres of land described in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from single Family-7 (SF-7) to Light Industrial (LI-c) district theoCitytofcDenton, Texas the . Umm II. That in accordance with ordinance No. 91-078, the property shall be subject to the following conditions Specified Usess The property may only be used for public buildings for local, state, or federal governments, and professional and administrative offices. z zoning official zoning nap is amended to show the AZ0191LM. in That waION IV. That any person violating any provision of this that a provision of thisdorda sum not inance eviolatexceeding ordinance shall, upon $2,000. Each day shall constitute a separate and district offense. aZCTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen date (14) cause thetcaptiongof tand histordinanceeto berg is of i here 1 s 5 F t t 3 .f +~eadANo. • 4yendai( )ale published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. 1994. f PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of i BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR l ATTEST: E JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY I BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. QRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYt i { i k t?n. y, ! 1 i PAGE 2 C C Y ~ e a a ApendaNo. 5/ r Ardait ate p + EXHIBIT A A 17.9115 acre tract of land located on the east side of Ruddell Street south of the extension of Hickory Street - also known as Dots 1 and 2, Block 1, Denton County Municipal Project. i ~I I I f; ry' 1 • Iw y +F' 1 r F gpendlNo CIT COUNEIL REPORT FOR1faT l OX6 DATEI July 1, 1994 Tor Mayor and Members of the City Council FROHt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTf RE NDATIONr Approve ordinance authorising mayor to execute an agreement to contribute funds and the expenditure of $180,003 for the U.S. 380 right-of-way The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is developing plans to widen The and j improve V.B. 'ASO, from U.S. Highway 77 (Elm Street) east to Texas Loop highway will be expanded to a six lane facility with left turn lanes. This is the standard agreement the TxDOT requires for local participation on TxwT 7 projects in the city limits. ~R.y c~~g nsoaaTMBNTB OR GROUPS AFFBCIM Bord funds (1983) will be utilised for this disbureement. The Utility Department ant develo rmined may have some utilities Cito The tizens and businlee esiwillebe in o eniencededuring in the near future). construction. Ton percent (10%) of estimatbd right-of-way cost and any utility relocation ~ Ten P nea "ed. i *fULLy SUB I T Di irre er Prepared byi c neon Su svieor of Bngineerinq Techs Right-of-Way Approveds J Ca or f nginsering i Transportation ABE00398/23 i~ i 3 • ~ ~ it r F e ta CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUADING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8307 Office of the City Manager MEMORANDUM TOi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROMe Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEt July 13, 1994 SUBJECTt Contract with Texas Department of Transportation to Begin the Acquisition of Right-of-Way for U.S. 380 You will recall that we visited with Council last night about this agreement. This would be the beginning of the acquisition of right-of-way for U.S. 380 from Loop 288 to Elm Street, (U.S. 377). The contract is for $180,000. We are suggesting using 1983 bond money to provide the funding for this TxDOT requirement. The process has been estimated to take about two and one half to three years by TxDOT officials. They will be handling all of the acquisition and all of the contact. Our staff will be helping find the owners and providing support where we can. I If you or the Council has further questions, I would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience. i Ric Sve a Deputy City Manager RS:bw AMM0051A Attachments 'Vedreated to Quality Senice" ~ i. /At A'j' k I 1. y~ O;ixDDt V ~endaNu Qzi '0 57 0:2 ;ge~tlalta 7 +kf9 - C ORDINANCE NO. ej( AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREE- MENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANS- PORTATION FOR ACQUIRING NECESSARY RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR A HIGHWAY PROJECT ON U. S. HIGHWAY 380; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Mayor is authorized to execute an Inter- local Agreement to Contribute Funds between the City of Denton and the Texas Department of Transportation for acquiring necessary rights-of-way for a highway project on U. S. Highway 380, for improvements to U. S. Highway 380 from U. S. Highway 77 east to Texas Loop 288 under the terms and conditions contained in said Agreement, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. I SECTION II. That the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the amount of One Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($180,000.00) for acquiring of said rights-of-way, as 1 specified in the Agreement. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immed- iately upon its passage and approval. b~ a PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. k S I BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR t y ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 9 Agenda No*Mz AgenWe ® Texas Department of Transportation 1/v P.O. BOX 3067 • DALLAS, TEXAS 75221.3067 • (214) 3246100 June 16, 1994 Denton County CSJ 0135-10-023 (Const.) U.S. Highway 380 From: U.S. Highway 77 To: Texas Loop 288 Mr. Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager City of Denton 215 East McKinney j Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. Harrell: We are pleased to inform you the Texas Transportation Commission has approved the subject project for development. This project is totally within the city limits of Denton. It is our understanding that the City of Denton is to be the local public agency to provide the local share of funding on this project. This project is listed in the 1994 Project Development Plan under National Highway System, Mobility Projects, and has a level of authority sufficient to proceed to right of way acquisition. Upon request, the Texas Department of Transportation will handle the acquisition of all right of way for the project provided the City of Denton advances the department a sum equal to lot of the estimates cost prior to initiation of acquisition. Based on the J requirements for additional right of way shown on the attached maps, we estimate the total cost for land and damages to remainders will be $10800,000.00. No utility facilities, eligible for reimbursement for relocation cost, are anticipated on the project. The Texas Department of Transportation will begin work on the project as soon as the City executes the enclosed Agreement to Contribute Funds (City Form), remits a check to us in the amount of $180,000.00 to cover the City;s estimated 10% share, and final approval is received from our administration in Austin. It is requested that (3) three copies of the agreement, Bich with original signatures, be returned to us together with the City's check for the above amount payable to "Texas Department of Transportation". Additionally, a grant of signature authority for the person executing the agreement is requested. ! An Equal Opporrunrfy Employer N i R genaaNo 9y {gendallenLQ late ~ s. 6 You are reminded that in the event the right of way costs should exceed the stated amount, we will require the City to pay its lot share of any additional amount. Likewise, should these cost be less than anticipated, the Texas Department of Transportation will refund the City's lot share of the difference. Please contact Harlan E. Moore at (214) 320-6267 if you have questions or if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Q .-r amen 7 .Huffman, P.E. Dietr ct Engineer Enclosures I I I E I f i E l 't ~ IC~DOOY~~ 1 T E s +gendaNo. Texas Depart<oent of Trantpoctation a endaltem Form D•15-129 Rev. 9/91 g Agreement to Contribute Funds rote (City Form) THE STATE OP TEXAS ) Contract No. County Denton COUNTY OF Travis } Federal Pro'ea No. _ CS1 No. 0135-10- ROW AccouaR No. 6018-2- This Agreement by and between the State of Texas, acting of Denton through the Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the State, and _ Texas, acting by and through its duly authorized official udder Ordirutnce dated the - - da of 19-, hereinafter called the City, shall be effective on the date of approval and execution by and on behalf of the State. WHEREAS, the State has previously requested the City to enter into a contractuai agreement and acquire right of way for a highway project on Highway No. with the following proj~ct limits: Prom u• • Highway 71 To. exaa op ite and WHEREAS, the City has now requested that the State assume responsibility for acquisition of all necessary right of way for said highway project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to voluntarily contribute to the State funds equal to ten (10) per- cent of the cost of the said right of way for the proper development and construction of the State Highway System; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the City shall contribute to the State an amount equal to ten (10) percent of the cost of the right of way to be acquired by the State and shall transmit to the State with the mum of this agme rent, duly executed by the City a warrant or check payable to the Texas Department of Transportation in the amount o a gundred-Eighty Thousand and no/bundcathe Dollars 1800000-00 which represerits ten (10) percent of the estimia-ted cost of the right of way. J However, if it is found that this amount is insufficient to pay the City's obligation, then the City, upon request of the State, will forthwith supplerrient this amount hi such amount as is requested by the State. Upon completion of the highway project and in the events the total amount as paid by the City is morn than ten (10) percent of the actual cost of the right of way, any excess amount will be returned to the City by the Stale. Cost of the right of way soladred the State shall mean the total value of compensation paid to owners, including but not limped to utility owners, for their property Interests either through negotiations or eminent domain proceedings. CITY OF , TEXAS MECLMON RECOWM4DED: By' Mayor Disaact Engineer THE STATE OR TEXAS AMST: Certified as being execowd for the purpose sad effect of activating anAtor canyioi om the orders, ed"shed poticies or work propr+tna herdoton approved and suthoriaed by the Tear Transportation Commission under the mthorityof Mitaute Order By: Director d Riaht of Way Date: - y lCITY COUNCI i 4~ Nf ♦ O 4 t 0 ~ t T 0 r, S ~ f'N f7~ f . fi ~dtNo D ~ A0W CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (617) 566.6307 Office of I h a City Manager MEMORANDUM TOt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager PROMi Rick Sveh:.a, Deputy City Manager DATBs July 13, 1994 1 SUBJ8CTo Purcha9e of the Porter Tract Y. Mike Bucek has attached an ordinance that amends the budget. As you and Council may recall, the city agreed to purchase this Porter tract for the airport extension. The city and representative of r the Porter family have agreed to this amount of money. This the north appropriate the air de chase t he allow us to property on make the in order to pu port. 3 If you or the Council has questions, I would be happy to try and i answer them. 4CS ~la Deputy City Manager RStbw AMM00519 Attachments t , I ' 41 i "Dedicated to Quality Sers ice" M1. r i 4 je\wpdoce\ord\bud.ord +gendaN4 W/ i0vqs 4gendalte Dale - - u A 0~3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1993-1994 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF $260263 FROM THE UNOBLIGATED FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-022-0019-9001; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on September 14, 1993, pursuant to Ordinance No. 93- 158, the City authorized the appropriation of $29,859,943 to the General Fund; and WHEREAS, there was no appropriation in the General Fund providing for the expenditure of the $26,263 required by the Judgment signed by Judge Don R. Windle on March 10, 1994 in Cause No. CV-92-00522-C, styled City of Denton vs John W. Porter. and wife. Margaret E. Porter, relating to the condemning of right-of- way for the extension of the runway at the Denton Municipal Airport from 5,000 to 6,000 feet; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the failure of the city to pay a judgment when funds are available can result in the City j being held in contempt of court and the issuance by a court of a writ of mandamus arbitrarily directing from which account the judgment should be paid; and j WHEREAS, Sec. 8.08 of the Charter of the City of Denton and TEX. GOVT CODE ANN. 5102.009 (Vernon 1988) provide a governing c body may authorize an emergency Expenditure as an amendment to the original budget only in a case ct grave public necessity to meet an unusual and unforeseen condition that could riot have been included in the original budget through the use of reasonably diligent 3 thought and attention; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the failure to pay into ` the Registry of County Court at Law No. 3 the funds required by the above referenced judgment, will create a grave public necessity; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: i SECTION 1. That the Council adopts the findings listed above. j SECTION ii. That the 1993-94 Budget of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended by appropriating the sum of $26,263 from the unobligated fund balance of the General Fund to Account Number 100-022-0019-9001 for the expenditure of funds which were not anticipated prior to the adoption of the 1993-94 Budget. SECTION III. That the City Secretary shall attach a copy of this ordinance to the 1993-1994 budget and publish a copy of this ordinance in the next issue of the Denton Record-Chronicle. s +gandaNo ApanOalt~ tote- FCTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective from and after its date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of , 1994. BOB CASTLEBERRY# MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERSj CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCB, CITY ATTORNEY i BY: c . << t 1 { J , PAGE 2 1, yp Ir Tt 9 f. ' XITY~ -COUNCI ILL 4~ ♦ p ~ t O O . •ro M t ~fwQ~ r. e r a t ~ W 1 1t l ~endatt ?~',f~i m y 19, 1994 CITY COUNCIL 7 E AGENilJ ITEM I TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. ':drrell, City Manager SUBJECTt LONE STAR GAS TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT AND PLANT PROTECTION GAB SALES CONTRACT RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of June 1, 1994, recommended approval of the Gas Transportation Contract and I Plant Protection Gas S~:les Contract with Lone Star Gas. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: In January of this year, the Utility staff presented a review of the key contract provision of the proposed Transportation and Plant Protection Sales Contract provisions to the Utility j Board. At that time, the Board reviewed the terms of the proposed contracts and recommended that the contact terms with ! Lone Star Gas be finalized and brought back to the Board for final contract approval recommendation. Since the January meeting, the Legal Department has stated that a formal W d process must be completed, regardless of the negotiations with Lone Star. The bid process has been completed with Lone Star Gas submitting the low bid per the terms of the proposed j contract. i I ~ J The terms can be summarized as follows: TRANSPORTA7LON CONTRACT 1. A minimum transport quantity of 1.5 BCF per year 0$0.13/MMBtu I Take or Transport Pay Annual j Quantity Year _ Rate Cost Up to 1.5 BCF 1994-96 $0.13 $195,000 1997 $0.135 $202,500 1998 $0.14 $210,000 1.5 BCF - 3 BCF 1994 $0.13 1995 $0.135 1996 $0.14 1997 $0.145 1998 $0.15 i o r. r } J' ~gendaNo 4genda~te. S Page 2 date P9y 2017 More than 3 BCF 1994 $0.11 1995 $0.115 1996 $0.12 1997 $0.125 1998 $0.13 These fees can be used at any time of the year. 2. A 5-year requirements contract for facilities in existence as of January 1, 1994. 3. The City of Denton will not construct an alternative pipeline to deliver gas during the 5-year contract. 4. No balancing charges will be assessed the City of Denton if M imbalances are corrected within 30 days of Lone Star Gas written notice. 5. Lone Star Gas will retain 14 of volumes received for transportation fuel. 6. Effective date of Contract - January 1, 1994. i 1 Plant Protection Sa ea.Contract 1. 5-Year Contract 2. Maximum of 1000 MCF/day 3. Rate of $2500/month ! 4. Effective date of contract - January 1, 1994 5. Base price $0.38 per MMBtu - escalator $0.01/per year The key terms of the present Lone Star Transportation Contract are as follows: 1. 4-year contract based upon 1.25 BCF maximum annual volume 2. Demand charge of $0.375 multiplied by annual volume equal to $468,750 annually 3. Demand reduction allowed by purchase of transportation and/or contract gas. Maximum reduction allowed equal to BOt, P resulting in net fixed cost of $97,750 firm regardless of take. 4. After transportation of 1.25 BCF, transportation rate was $0.21 for daily volume less than 5000 MMBtu, or $0.16 for daily volumes more than 5000 MMBtu. i Provisions of the present contract called for .010 escalation for each year from 1991 through 1993. Present rate for 1993 is $0.24 for daily volumes less than 5000 MMBtu, or $0.19 for i F 1 3 i ApendsNo - 2 _ Agendaltem Page 3 03 le daily volumes more than 5000 MMBtu. Fxhibit I Cost Comparison 7 shows initial period for each transportation contract comparison. Present Transportation Contracts between Lone Star and other TMPA cities are as follows: Greenville - Similar to present Denton contract i Both Garland and Bryan have access to other gas pipelines besides the Lone Star pipeline. The key terms to Garland's contract with Lone Star are: Delivery to Olinger Plant $0.11 + 1% fuel 2.8 BCF minimum for 9 months per year $0.1225 for 3 months Over 2.8 BCF @$0.0825 I?eliverv to Newman Plant $0.23 + It fuel Bryan's contract with Lone Star is $0.085 with 3 BCF minimum take or pay. The proposed contract with Lone Star is a major improvement from the present contract. However, there is some risk in the proposed contract in that purchased volumes below approximately 0.6 BCF will result in cost-of-transportation higher than previous contract (see attached Exhibit I). During FY 93-94, Denton transported approximately 3.2 BCF during normal heating/cooling year. During the previous FY 92-93, Denton transported approximately 1.5 BCF containing an abnormally cool summer season. During the upcoming t fiscal year, Brazos is expected to add generation to the TMPP Pool which will (see attached Exhibits 1r). Ho ever, even thoughothis generation is added, gas purchases by Denton are expected to remain above 1.5 BCF during the contract period assuming normal summer weather. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED, i Denton Utility system, Public Utility Board, City Council, Denton Rate Payers, and TMPA / TMPP member cities. G I igentlaNo Allf 3 ~gentla~tem.~~7 Page 4 Oate?' ~'QL1 q4 4,7 FISCAL IMPACT: A comparison of cost-of-transportation is detailed on attached Exhibit I. Savings between proposed contract and present contract vary with higher transported volumes resulting in larger net savings. Respec ully1submitted, U Uoy'W V. Harrell, City M age? Prepared by: 11 (jq~~" 1 P.E. Belson, Executive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit I Transportation Cost Comparison Exhibit II Comparison of Reserve Margins - TMPA Exhibit III Plant Protection Gas Contract j Exhibit IV Excerpt from PUB Minutes of 6/1/94 k t 1 , 1 :f EXHIBIT I TRANSPORTATION COST COMPARISON 0.5 0.45 0.4 0,35 z 0.3 M ' 0.25 i r 0.2 { r~ 0.15 0.1 i 0.5 1 1.5 2 2,5 3 BCF j O PREY COK-RACT <5000 + PREV CONTRACT >5CO0 0 PROPOSED CONTRACT j i. C~ P x KAWDO MORD„AN:.As A No 4~ D AWN ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO A CONTRACT WITH LANE STAR GAS COMPANY AND THE CITIES OF BRYAN, GREEN- VILLE AND GARLAND FOR THE TRANSFER OF GAS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THERE*?R; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute Amendment No. 1 to a contract with Lone Star Gas Company and the cities of Bryan, Greenville and Garland, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and which extends the term of the Transfer of Gas Agreement approved by the City Council in December, 1989, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. SECTION 11, That the City Council hereby authorizes the expen- diture of funds as provided in the contract. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immed- iately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. i E BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR i 1 ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY i BY. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAY.OVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY j BY: 4 L LA'.4 { VA I ' f k R S s L genaaNO -Qa3 +gendalte-m AMENDMENT TO TRANSFER GAS AGREEMENT 0810 7 ~ -747 THIS AMENDMENT is made, entered into by and between LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as 'Seller" and CITY OF DENTON, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer'; WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Transfer of Gas Agreement (Agreement) dated January 1, 1990; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend said Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, Seller and Buyer hereby contract and agree to amend the aforesaid Transfer Gas Agreement effective January 1, 1994 as follows: The year "1990" which appears twice in the first recital paragraph of said ? Agreement, shall be deleted and replaced with the year '1994." It is the intention of the parties hereto to amend said Agreement Lnsofar and only insofar as g stated herein and all other terms, conditions and provisions of said Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as stated therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Buyer affix their signatures hereto in acknowledgement of and agreement to the foregoing. t LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, a CITY OF DENTON Division of ENSERCH CORPORATION r . 1 By: By: G. Marc Lyons Title: Title: ATTEST: ATTEST: By: - BY: - olaldinto,rLhp410 E i k gendaNO ,03 agendaEte AMENDMENT TO TRANSFER GAS AGREEMENT )ate _ 77q-- - ?47 THIS AMENDMENT is made, entered into by and between LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "Seller" and CITY OF DENTON, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer"; VIINESSEIH: WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Transfer of Gas Agreement (Agreement) dated January 1, 1990; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend said Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, Seller and Buyer hereby contract and agree to amend the aforesaid Transfer Gas Agreement effective January 1, 1994 as follows: The year "1990" which appears twice in the first recital paragraph of said Agreement, shall be deleted and replaced with the year "1994." It is the intention of the parties hereto to amend said Agreement insofar and only insofar as stated herein and all other terms, conditions and provisions of said Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as stated therein. L11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Buyer affix their signatures hereto in acknowledgement of and agreement to the foregoing. r LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, a CITY OF DENTON Division of ENSERCH CORPORATION r s i By: By: G. Marc Lyons . Z Title: _ Title: ATTEST: ATTEST: By. By. t E ctolQ.nama.~.yup i I , CITY COUNCI O. s. 4 yj ~ O S e ~ • toy to O x d E a ~wDOt s Joao a a+E , s r ~ N,N* Data -!9 - ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AWARDING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND LONE STAR GAS COMPANY FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF GAS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive sealed proposals for the transportation of gas in accord- ance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has reviewed and recommended that the proposal of Lone Star Gas Company is the lowest responsible pro- posal for services as shown in the "Bid Proposals* submitted therefore and WHEREAS, from an examination of the bids and an investigation of alternative sources, the City Manager has determined that the sole source available to the City for the transportation of gas to Denton's Spencer Station is Lone Star Gas Company's pipeline; and WHEREAS, tho City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the transportation of gas; NOW, THEREFOREF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the proposal of Lone Star Gas Company is here- by accepted and approved. I SECTION IT, That the City Manager is hereby authorized execute a contract witi =,one Star Gas Company for the transporta- tion tion of gas under the coalitions set forth a copy attached hereto and incorporated by reference erein. of which SECTION III- That by the acceptance and approval of the above proposal, the City Council hereby authorises the expenditure of funds therefore in the amount and in accordance with the written contract made pursuant thereto. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become affective immed- lately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR f r { 3 v r ~ qy agandal Data_ 7- S ATTEST: JEN11IFER WALTERSo CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY BY: i I 1 ~ i r, yS ~ f j d {i PAGE 2 406MINo. ~'DZ3 Agendalte We EXHIBIT 11 LS-MC-#1725 GAS TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into to be effective January 1, 1994, by and between LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, a Division of ENSERCH Corporation, a Texas corporation, hereinafter referred to as Transporter" and CITY OF DENTON, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Shipper"; AII_!EE Ili: WHEREAS, Shipperowns orcontrols certain quantities of natural gaswhich are not subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Regulatory Commission (the "FERC") under either the Natural Gas Act of 1938, as amended, (the "NGA'), or the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, as amended, (the "NGPA"), and Shipper desires that Transporter (a) receive gas from Shipper (or its designee) at the Point(s) of Receipt hereinafter set forth and (b) redeliver gas to the Point(s) of Delivery hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, Transporter owns and operates a pipeline system and is willing to transport gas for Shipper under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and pursuant to Section 5.02(b) of the Texas Gas Utility Regulatory Act; NOW, THEREFORE, for and In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, the adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Transporter and Shipper hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I. y QUANTITY f 1.1 (a) Shipper hereby agrees that transportation service under this Agieement shall cover one hundred percent (100%) of Shipper's Spencer Steam Electric Station's entire natural gas requirements, except for (i) any purchases under that certain Gas Sales Contract between Shipper and Transporter dated January 1, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the "Gas Sales Contract") or (ii) gas transported by Transporter toShipper'splantunderothergastransportation agreements between Transporter and other third party Shippers. It is agreed that (k) the total maximum daily volume of gas to be transported under this Agreement shall not exceed a daily volume of thirty thousand (30,000) MMBtu, w0ess mutually agreed to by the parties hereto, and (ii) in consideration of the rates established in Article IV hereof Shipixr shall each year transport hereunder an annual minimum quantity of baseload" gas (as hereinafter defined) equal to at least one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) MMBtu, excluding any "Retention Volumes" (as hereinafter defined). l it Is further hereby agreed that the calculation of all quantities of gas received and delivered hereunder shall, for all purposes, including, but not limited to, payment and determination of imbalance and retention volumes, be on an MMBtu basis. Transporter's receipt and delivery of such gas volumes will be subject to Transporter's existing or future pipeline capacity, system 1 transmissibility and operating capabilities; and Transporter may refuse to transport gas hereunder t if, in the reasonable opinion of Transporter, to do so would adversely affect Transporter's sales 1 e C i e apendaNo E3 Apildail We~T r service to residential and commercial customers and other priorities of sales scrVice established by in good faith endeaor the to receive and deliver tsuchf gas and i'll not arbitrarily rand capriciously elfu a 10 transport gasvon behalf of Shipper hereunder. (b) Anytime Shipper fails to transport under this Agreement the one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) MMBtu annual minimum quantity of "baseload" gas, as set forth herein, Transporter shall render Shipper a notice and statement of delinquent volumes specifying the volumes of "baseload" gas Shipper failed to transport. The amount due and payable under this Agreement for such delinquent volumes shall be computed by multiplying (I) he difference between (a) one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) ?AMBtu and (b) the volumes of 'baseload" gas, on a MMBtu basis, which Shipper actually had Transporter transport during such contract year by (ii) the rate in effect hereunder duringsuch year for "baseload" gas. Such delinquent amount(s) shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the date of Transporter's notice and statement of delinquent volumes. (c) In the event this Agreement should ever be terminated or cancelled for any reason before the end of the primary term hereunder, then Transporter shall render Shipper a notice and statement of delinquent volumes specifying the "baseload" volumes Shipper failed to transport during ment an the thencurrent annual underthis Agreement forrsuof the primary term of this ch delinquent volumes. In ttheeevent the 1 the amount due and payable Agreement should ever be terminated or cancelled for any reason after the end of the primary term but before the end of the then current annual period, thenTransporter shall render Shipper a notice and statement of delinquent volumes specifying the "baseload" volumes Shipper failed to transport during such annual period and the amount due and payable under this Agreement for such delinquent volumes. Such delinquent amount(s) shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the date of Transporter's notice and statement of delinquent volumes. In the event (I) Transporter arbitrarily and i capriciously or terminates this terminates nth violation pursuant hereotof through IV subparagraph of t(e) e e, oefo Transporter (e) hereof before the end of the primary term hereunder, then Shipper shall (within 30 days thereafter) pay Transporter a prorated amount equal t;the product of (i) one twelfth (1/12) of the annual minimum quantity of "baseload" volumes and (rr the number of months which have J elapsed in the then current year through the then current month, and ut the "baseload" rate in effect hereunder during such year. Transporter (d) In the event of any interruption or curtailment of service to Shipper by under tlds Agreement, including force majeure but e- tuding any interruption of transportation } service as a result of termination or cancellation of this Agreement, the amount by which the transportation oot n" thouande(1On000)tsMMBtu's efoorr ny atday of risuch intterlruptioneor (but never to exceed lied with its annual curtailment) shall, for the purpose of determining whether Shipper has comp minimum baseload" transportation obligation as set forth In this Article, be added to the such amount of "baseload" gas actually transported by Transporter under this Agreement year, and provided such interruption(s) Shicort's m supplier(s), arr sueagent(s), solely r de ~Ce(s)) hero undcrr(e.g , no fault of Shipper ( nd/ Ppergan Ppltc() nom nations, ti e to the Shipper's fable might include problems etc.). Sh pper agrees hat sa dlcredit sha ilbe Shipper's ' regulations, breach otwarrantieses, payments, sole and exclusive remedy for any such interruptions or curtailments by Transporter. 1.2 It is recognized that due to the inab linty of gas received es to bnt of pree isely such and to Shipper may not bW 2 F ~get►QaNo Apendalt Oare 7- 5 0~l9 receipts or deliveries. However, Transporter, to the extent practi,able, ail] deliver to Shipper each day a quantity of gas equivalent to ninety nine percent (9S%) of the quantity of gas icceived by Transporter from Shipper (or its designee) on such day and Transporter shall retain the one percent (1%) balance of the quantity of gas received as normal gas lost, gas used as fuel and gas used in day- to-day pipeline operations (the "Retention Volume"). (b) It shall be the responsibility of Shipper to monitor, and if necessary, adjust, or cause to be adjusted, (i) deliveries of gas to Transporter for transportation and (ii) receipts of transportation gas from Transporter, in order to maintain a balance of receipts and deliveries. Transporter shall not be obligated to receive or deliver quantities of gas in excess of those quantities nominated by Shipper, in accordance with paragraph 1.3 hereof, for transportation hereunder, nor shall Transporter be obligated to deliver to Shipper at the Delivery Point(s) quantities of gas in excess of those quantities received from Shipper at the Receipt Point(s), less the Retention Volume, Shipper shall monitor, to the best of its ability, receipts and deliveries hereunder and shall advise Transporter of any situation wherein an imbalance has occurred or may occur unless corrective action is taken. Shipper shall be obligated to adjust its receipts and/or deliveries of transportation gas to the extent necessary to correct or avoid any imbalance and to notify Transporter of such adjustments. Any adjustments to receipts and/or deliveries by Shipper, whether or not pursuant to notification from either party, shall be coordinated with Transporter's gas control personnel. (c) An Imbalance shall exist hereunder where, during any month of the term hereof, there is a numerical difference between the quantity of gas, exclusive of the total of those volumes of gas delivered under the Gas Sales Contract, delivered by Transporter to Shipper and the quantity of gas received by Transporter from Shipper (or its designee) during any month, and any such imbalance due Transporter shall be corrected duringthe month immediately following the month in which such imbalance occurs by allocating to Transporter one hundred percent (100%) of deliveries at the Receipt Point(s) hereunder during such following month until such time as the imbalance due Transporter is corrected; however, should Shipper fail during any month of the term hereof to completely make up a prior month's imbalance then, (i) in the case of any portion of such prior month's imbalance due Transporter ("underdeliveries by Shipper") which is not eliminated, Shipper shall purchase such imbalance volume(s) from Transporter in accordance with and pursuant to the terms of the Gas Sales Contract; or (ii) in the case of any portion of such prior month's imbalance due Shipper ("overdeliveries by Shipper") which is not eliminated, Transporter shall have the right to collect from Shipper an amount equal to the product of ten cents (log) multiplied by the number of MMBtu's in such imbalance volume(s) (and further provided should Shipper fail during any month of the term hereof to correct a prior month's imbalance due Shipper, Transporter reserves the right, with twenty-four (24) hours notice to Shipper or iu designee, to restrict, interrupt, or reduce the quantity of gas Transporter will accept at the Receipt Point(s) until such time as the imbalance is corrected). In the event Shipper is required to purchase from Transporter any imbalance as provided in (i) above, Transporter agrees to credit Shipper for transportation fees paid by Shipper to Transporter hereunder on such imbalance volume(s); provided, however, such imbalance volume(s) shall not be used for the purpose of determining whether Shipper has transported the annual minimum quantity of "baseload" gas. (d) Notwithstanding anything contained herein which might be construed to the contrary. Transporter shall always have the total and unrestricted right, but with no obligation whatsoeve r, to at any time and from time to time restrict, interrupt, or reduce its delivery of gas to Shipper at the i Delivery Point(s) on a daily basis to match the quantities of gas delivered by Shipper or Shipper's designee(s) to Transporter at the Receipt Point(s) on such day, less the Retention Volume. i 1.3 At least two (2) working days prior to the first calendar day of each month during the 1 term hereof, Shipper and/or its designee shall notify Transporter of the daily volumes of gas Shipper 3 ~peredaHo LI-O Apendalt L Data d o; ~ s nominates for transportation at the Receipt and Delivery Points under this Agreerr nt. Each such transportation nomination shall contain Shipper's nominated quantities for the Rcr:;lt and Delivery Points, Shipper's designation of whether the nominated volumes are oe "baseload" or "incremental" voiumea hereunder, designation of the appropriate contract(s) covering such gas, and the identity by name and telephone number of individual(s) who have authority to confirm the nominated gas volumes at each Receipt and Dclivcry Point. Timely nominations may be given by verbal notice; provided, however, Shipper shall furnish written confirmation thereof within five (S) business days of the date of such verbal notice. Shipper and/or its designee may revise nominated quantities on any business day upon verbal notice of any such reduction of nominated quantities, but such verbal notice must be received by Transporter prior to 12:00 noon Central time of anybusiness day to be effective the next succeeding business day. In no event shall the maximum daily volume to be nominated by Shipper for transportation from each Receipt Point hereunder during each month of the term hereof ever exceed the maximum daily nomination volume for each point as set by Transporter prior to the beginning of each month. If Shipper and/or its designee fails to furnish transportation nominations as required herein for any month during the term hereof, Transporter may interrupt transportation service hereunder for such month until forty eight (48) hours after such notification is received, and such interruption of service shall not prevent enforcement by Transporter of any other of its legal rights or remedies nor be construed as a breach of Transporter's obligations hereunder. Shipper shall be entitled to delegate any or all such nomination responsibilities to a third party (Shipper's designee) upon thirty (30) !ays prior written notice to Transporter, but Shipper shall remain ultimately liable hereunder for any and all nomination responsibilities hereunder. ARTICLE II. LQCMIONS OF POIM'S OF RECEIPT ,sNp DELIVERY 2.1 Receipt Point(s): Gas delivered by Shipper (or its designee) to Transporter hereunder shall be delivered at points which are sometimes herein referred to as the Transporter Receipt Point(s)" or "Point(s) of Receipt" and located at mutually agreeable point(s) on Transporter's intrastate pipeline transmission system, and any such mutually agreeable points shall be specifically set forth and Identified in writing signed by both Transporter and Shipper. It is agreed that all Transporter Receipt Point(s) to be established hereunder will be subject to Transporter's prior approval and rch approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 2.2 Delivery Point(s): Gas transported by Transporter hereunder shall be delivered to Shipper (or for its account) where gas first passes from Transporter's metering equipment into Shipper's Spencer Steam Electric Station in Denton, Texas (sometimes herein referred to as "Point(s) of Delivery") or other point(s) as provided in the Transfer of Gas Agreement between rransportcr and Shipper dated January 1, 1990, as amended. 2.3 Additional Receipt Points: It is understood by both parties that Shipper and Transporter may mutually agree in writing to establish other Receipt Point(s) hereunder; provided, however, Transporter shall tot be obligated to establish new Receipt Point(s) more frequently than once every two (2) months, unless due to circumstances beyond Shipper's control Shipper (or its designee) is unable to supply gas to the original Receipt Point(s) hereunder. In such event, and upon receipt by Transporter of documentation satisfactory to Transporter verifying such event and Shipper's inability to remedy same, Transporter may, in its sole discretion, agree to establish other Receipt 4 ~gcndrNo C? - Apetldalte 's ttatn._._7"~9" Poirt(s). In the event Shipper desires that Transporter receive gas at a proposed point(s), Shipper shall notify Transporter in writing of each such proposed point, including in such notice estimated maximum daily delivery volume at such point and the location thereof and Shipper shall therein warrant that the quality of gas to be received at each such proposed point meets the quality osed meets the specifications defined , paragraph and that such , of gas and each such and all other applicable terms and requirements of Article I 6.2 conditions contained in this his Agreement. Transporter will promptly evaluate each point and if such s o hlerwise mutually within ten (10) working days of Transporters t receipt of Sh Shipper's notice, system, agreed to by the parties hereto, whether or not Transporter is able to accept gas from Shipper's proposed new Receipt Point. If such Receipt Point is not an established Receipt Point on Trans porter'spipeline syste,Transporterwill notify Shipperwithinthirty(30) daysof Transporter's receipt ofShipper'snotice, unlessotherwise mutually agreed toobytheR hereto,whinhe event Transporter Is able to accept gas from Shipper's proposed Transporter aipat~tTransporter will promptly notify Shipper and pro de theestatus of ancilnd thirty day y per' rovided, however, no additional Receipt estimated ted completion date of the required evaluation; p Point(s) will be established hereunder without the prior written agreement of Transporter. Upon Transporters agreement to establish any additional Receipt Point(s) pursuant hereto, Exhibit "A" shall be revised to reflect the additional Receipt Point(s). ARTICLE III. PR SSUnzC e t t OF RECEIPT AND DECRY to Transporter at tht! Recept Points) at 3.1 Shipper ndlor its designee) ss all delneesystem at such point; p ovNed, (however( that pressures sufficient to enter Transporter' Shipper's delivery murn allowable operating pressure at any such point Point(s) shall not exceed Transporter's maA ressure at J 3.2 a(s). o tr sha uSunhipper no circumsto nces 1 allaTransporter evertbe five (75) prig into Shipper Delivery Point(s) Shipper obligated to attempt 13 Sdeli tatiover n located pressure in excess of seventy 's Spencer Steam Electic in Denton, ARTICLE IV. RAM i hereof for services rendered 4.1 Shipper shall payTransporter each forth below commencing with i~nittial deliveries of gas S hereunder during such month, at the rates : r hereunder: (a) For all "bascload" gas volumes (i.e. Shipper's one million five hundred ousan (1,500,000) MMBtu per year transportation obligation hereunder as set forth inShiP arapgraer sh ]hall.1 of pay gas Article I hereof) delivered hereunder by Transporter at the Delivery Point(s), baseload' Transporter thirteen cents (13¢) for each such MMBtu (the "baseload rate'). Only volumes transported hereunder and paid for by Shipper during a year shall be credited toward for such year. annual minimum obligation hereunder S t Benda NoD~ cCL,~~~.~ 4gendaltern- -/2-~... t~ liale ,S- &P9 (b) For any "incremental volumes", the rate charged hereunder shall be (i) thirteen cents (lie) for each incremental MMBtu delivered hereunder at the Delivery Point(s), up to one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) MMBtu of incremental gas during a year and (ii) eleven cents (1 le) for each incremental MMBtu delivered hereunder at the Delivery Point(s) over and above one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) MMBtu of incremental gas during a year. Any quantities of gas which Shipper elects to transport hereunder as incremental volumes in this paragraph 4.1 (b) herein shall not be credited or used for the purpose of determining whether Shipper has complied with the annual minimum transportation obligation. (c) It is agreed by the parties hereto that the thirteen cent (13e) rate charged in paragraph 4.1(a) above for "baseload" volumes shall escalate one half cent (Vic) per MMBtu beginning on January 1, 1997, and annually thereafter during the term of this Agreement. It is also agreed by the parties hereto that the thirteen cent (13e) rate charged in paragraph 4.1 (b) above for incremental volumes up to one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) MMBtu in a year, shall escalate one half cent (Y:e) per MMBtu beginning on January 1, 1995, and annua'ly thereafter during the term of this Agreement. It is further agreed by the parties hereto that the eleven cent (Ile) rate charged in paragraph 4.1(b) above for incremental volumes above one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) MMBtu in a year shall escalate one half cent (Vii) per MMBtu beginning on January 1, 1996, and annually thereafter during the term of this Agreement. (d) The rates charged in paragraph 4.1(b) above for incremental volumes can be used at anytime to transport incremental volumes, and such incremental gas may be transported separately I or together with "baseload" gas during any month of the term hereof with a written nomination by Shipper hereunder stating such prior to the beginning of such month as provided in paragraph 1.3 above. (e) Should the appropriate regulatory agency find such rates to be unreasonable for any reason or in anyway in violation of any provision of law, and determine a rate lower than that provided for herein, Transporter may terminate this Agreement upon giving Shipper written notice of its intention to do so within sixty (60) days after the date of such judgement or order, which cancellation shall become effective at the end of thirty (30) days from and after the date of such notice. Should the agency determine a rate higher than that provided for herein, Shipper may terminate this Agreement upon giving Transporter written notice of its intention todo sowithin sixty (60) days after the date of such judgement or order, which cancellation shall become effective at the end of thirty (30) days from and after the date of such notice. J (f) In addition to the rates set forth herein, Shipper also agrees to reimburse Transporter for any Taxes as defined in Section 5 of GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS attached hereto as APPENDIX "A". ARTICLE V. i ~F.RM 5.1 This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 1994, hereunder and shall, subject to the terms and provisions hereof, remain in full force and effect fora primary term until January 1, 1 1999, hereof, and year to year thereafter until cancelled by either party giving the other party one hundred twenty (120) days' prior written notice. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the con:rary, Transporter shall have the right to terminate this Agreement effective on the same date as the date of termination or cancellation of the Gas Sales Contract by giving Shipper at least thirty (30) days notice, if practicable, of such termination. Notwithstanding the above, if an imbalance in deliveries exists on the date of termination hereof between the quantities theretofore delivered at 6 +gandaNo 6 agrdallem~S 7f Ogle 7- ! y - _ 9419 the Receipt Point(s) and Delivery Point(s), the term of this Agreement shall be extended for a period suf lent to allow the parry whose deliveries are in arrears to promptly eliminate any imbalance. Provided further, any termination, cancellation, or expiration of this Agreement shall never operate to extinguish the obligation to make payment for monies due hereunder. ARTICLE Vi. LAWS AND REGULATIONS 6.1 (a) This Agreement shall be subject to all applicable State and Federal laws, orders, directives, rules and regulations of any governmental body, official or agency having jurisdiction; therefore, Transporter's obligations and liabilities hereunder shall be limited accordingly. (b) Shipper and Transporter recognize that portions of the gar tramporred hereunder may from time to time be transported to Transporter by Shipper utilizing interstate pipelinefacilities under the terms of Section 311(a) of the NGPA. Such transportation shall be accomplished in a manner so as not to subject Transporter's pipeline facilities or the gar transported hereunder to regulation under the NGA or the NGPA. With regard to all such transportation, Shipper agrees to obtain transportation under and perform timely all requirements of Section 311(x) of the NGPA, and Shipper agrees to timely provide Transporter with copies of all forms and correspondence received or given in regard to transportation for Shipper under Section 311(a) of the NGPA it requested to do so by Transporter. Should Shipper determine at any time that it andfor its agents are not totally in compliance with Section 311(a) of the NGPA, Shipper shall immediately terminate deliveries ofgattoTransporter. Further, this Agreement shall be deemed of its own terms to tvminate on the day before the date of initial deliveries of such gas; provided, however, such termination shall never be construed to I pair any right each party de rrant~he (c) Except as contemplated in the immediately preceding p~grap other that its or its agent's facilities uKUzed for the delivery and acceptance of gas hereunder are not subject to the NGA. As a material represenmtion, without which both parties would not have been wilting to execute this Agreement, each party warrants to the other party that it and its agents will take no action nor commit any act of omission which will subjat this transaction or the other party's facilities to jurisdiction of the FERC or its successor governmental agency under the terns of the Nt hoth GPA. The gar delivered and accepted hereunder shall not have been nor shall be sold, transported, or erwise / utilized in a manner which will subject either party to the terns of the NGA or the NGPA. In addition ~J to and without awtuding any remedy the aggrieved party may have at law or in equity, the party who breaches the above warrantier and representations shall be Liable to the aggrieved party for all damages, injury and reasonable esipense the aggrieved party may sustain by reason of any breach hereof. Further, should either party or its agents perform any act, or cause any Legion to be performed, at any time, that results in any gar covered hereunder becoming regulated by or subject to jurisdictional authority of the FERC, or successor governmental authority, under the terns of the NGA or NGPA, contrary to this Agreement, this.1gteement shall be deemed of its own terms to terminate on the day before the date of such this occurrence; provided, however, such termination shall never be construed go impair any could ecru a NGA Article. Shipper hereby wal vesany deftnsefor breach of this paragraph that Transporter jurisdiction under the provisions of Section 1(c) of such Act. ARTICLE Vli. GEiv~RAt TERMS AND CONDITIONS 7.1 The GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS attached hereto as APPENDIX "A" are 7 s Agenda Ita fps 7 pate 7-/ incorporated herein and made a part hereof by this reference. ARTICLE VIII. MISCELLANEOUS 8.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that this Agreement shall not be transferred or assigned by Shipper without the prior written consent of Transporter (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) and any purported transfer or assignment without such consent shall be null and void and shall not operate to release Shipper from its obligations hereunder. 8.2 Any notice, request, demand, statement or payment provided for in this Agreement may be given in writing directed to the party to whom given and mailed or delivered at such party's address as follows: (notices and Invoices) City of Denton Municipal Utilities 1701•A Spencer Road Denton, Texas 76205 Attn: Electric Production Manager Fax:(817) 383.7555 (Notices) (Payments) Lone Star Gas Company Lone Star Gas Company 301 S. Harwood Street P.O. Box 910255 s Dallas, Tetras 75201 Dallas, Texas 75391-0255 Attn: Transportation Contract Administration f Fax: (214) 573.5134 or at such address as each party may by like notice give to the other. Such mailed items shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in the United States mail (first class, registered or certified) or overnight delivery (e.g. Federal Express), postage prepaid or in the case of hand delivery, when given by a representative of either party to a representative of the other party; 9 provided, however, except for payments of amounts due hereunder, either party may provide such items hereunder by electronic mail or facsimile to the other party at the telephone number listed in paragraph 8.2 herein, and further provided the original copy of such item shall be sent to the othe r party within two (2) isusiaess days thereafter. 8.3 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties covering the subject matter bzteof, and there are t,o agreements, modifications, conditions or understandings, t written or oral, express or implied, pertaining to the subject matter hereof which are not contained herein. 8.4 Modifications of this Agreement shall be or become effective only upon the mutual i s " 8 t" v a y y ~pendeNu f ~gendalt ate I cxe:ution of appropriate supplemental agreements or amendments hereto by duly authorized representatives of the respective parties. 8.5 If any provision hereof shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, effect upon aalnd be of no shall not impair the enforceability oflany other vold or un nforceablity shall have such provision of this Agreement. 8.6 Transporter and Shipper acknowledge, agree and intend that this Agreement is entered into solely for the respective benefit of Transporter and Shipper and nothing contained in this ferrin any Agreement, either express or implied, shall be Int pre d or construed rn as conf upon any pig ts. remedies or claims under or in respect to this Agreement any P rson or entity not a party hereto, other than the successors or assigns of the Parties hereto. 8.7 This Agreement was drafted by both Transpom-, rand Shipper, and, accordingly, no court construing this Agreement shall construe it more stringently against one party than against the other. 8.8 This Agreement supersedes and replaces that certain Gas Transportation Agreement dated the amount(s) due lunder0suc precedit=g ant shall ,not be extinguished hereby payment of any In Witness Whereof, this Agreement has been executed in duplicate originals by the parties hereto as of the day and year first herein written. LONE STAR GAS COMPANY' a Division CITY OF DENTON of ENSERCH Corporation BY BY Name: Name: Richard A. Erskine Title Attest: Attest: ' i i 13y S BY-" Corporate Secretary T'itle:_,~, Title: Coral i 4 a i i i 1 w} Y tgendaNo Agendalte y Date.-"" STATE OF COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared , of City of Denton, a municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the day of A.D., 19_ t s i Notary Public in and for County, My commission expires the day of s a STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Richard A. Erskine. Attorney-in-Fact of LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, a Division of ENSERCH Corporation, a Texas corporation, known to me to be the person whose name Is subscnUd to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the _day of A.D. 19^ Notary Public in and for County, y My commission expires the day of , 19_ i t 4 i gendaNo e2 gendalle Wte - / t - I/ / o$ /9 STATE OF COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared _ of Cityof Denton, a municipal corporation, known to me to he the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the day of A. D., 19_. Notary Public in and f; ,,r County, My commission expires the _ day of STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS BEFORE ME, the u dersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on ~ this day personally appea;ed Richard A. Erskine. Attorney-in-Fact of LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, a Division of E.VSERCH Corporation, a Texas corporation, known to me to be the R, person whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the _day of A.D. 19 . k LL~ i t Notary Public in and for County, t My commission expires the day of 19 i r. i t R' , ;p ~er>daNo qZ 3 Agendal Date _ e I 411 SHEET NO. 1 APPENDIX "A" GAS TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT GtNERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Definitions (a) "Gas" shall mean natural gas produced from gas wells, vaporized natural gas liquids, gas produced in association with oil (casinghead gas) and/or the residue gas resulting from processing casinghead gas and/or gas well gas. (b) "Day" shall mean the 24-hour period beginning at 7:00 a.m.,Central time, on one calendar day and ending at 7:00 a.m., Central time, on the following calendar day. (c) "Month" shall mean the period beginning at 7:00 a.m., Central time on the first da., of a calendar month and ending at 7;00 a.m., Central time, on the first day of the succeeding calendar month. (d) "Year" shall mean a period of twelve (12) consecutive months beginning at 7:00 a.m., Central time, on the first dayof a calendar month and ending at 7:00 a.m, Central time, on the same date of each succeeding year during the term hereof. (e) "Mcl" Shall mean one thousand (1,000) cubic feet. i (f) The term "Btu" as used herein shall mean British Thermal Unit and, where appropriate, the plural thereof. The tern "MMBtu" shall mean one million (1,000,00) Btu. (g) "Heating Value" or 'Heat Content" shall mean the total heating value expressed in Btu per cubic foot (gross heating value) of the gas delivered hereunder, and shall be determined at a temperature of sixty (60) degrees Fahrenheit, saturated with water vapor and under a pressure equivalent to that of thirty (30) Inches of mercury at thirty-two (32) degrees Fahrenheit converted to base conditions of sixty (60) degrees Fahrenheit and an absolute pressure of fourteen and sixty- five one hundredths (14.65) pounds per square inch and adjusted to reflect actual water vapor content. (h) "Psis" shall mean pounds per square inch absolute. (I) "Psig' shall mean pounds per square inch gauge. i (j) "Point of Receipt" or 'Receipt Point" shall mean the point(s) where Transporter receives gas delivered to It by Shipper or by the designee of Shipper for Shipper's account. (k) "Point of Delivery" or 'Delivery Point" shall mean the point(s) where Transporter delivers gas to Shipper. 2. Mea ring" F;uiomen and Testing t f (a) The gas delivered to Transporter at the Receipt Point(s) shall be measured by means of measuring devices of standard type which shall be installed, operated and maintained by Transporter (or its designee) and gas delivered to Shipper (or for its account) at the Delivery Point(s) shall be measured by meters of standard type which shall be installed, operated and maintained by Transporter (or its designee). Measurement devices and equipment shall be tested and adjusted for accuracy on a regular schedule by the party metering the gas ( the "metering party"). (b) Shipper agrees to reimburse Transporter, subject to Shipper's prior approval of costs, within ten (10) days from the date of receipt of Transporter's invoice, for any tap valves, metering facilities and associated equipment and all labor and overhead expenses, attributable to the installation of such equipment, incurred by Transporter in effectuating the receipt and delivery of gas hereunder. If the invoiced amount is not paid when due, Interest on all unpaid amounts shall accrue at the rate of one and one-half percent (IV,%) per month, or the highest rate allowed by law, , k ,gvdaNo agWaltem 7W -]ale SHEET NO.' 2 whichever is less, from the date such amount is due Transporter. Failure of Transporter to receive total reimbursement within thirty (30) days of Shipper's receipt of Transporter's invoice will allow Transporter to suspend and/or terminate this Agreement. It is understood that although Shipper shall reimburse Tvinsporter for any tap valves, metering facilities and all associated costs incurred by Transporter in establishing any Receipt and/or Delivery Point, Shipper shall receive ownership of only the metering facilities and Transporter will be solely responsible for all activities in connection with said metering facilities, including, but not limited to, operation, testing, calibration, adjusting, repair and replacement (both at Shipper's expense), and maintenance, necessary for performance hereunder until Transporter disconnects and removes the metering facilities after termination of this Agreement. After said disconnection and removal, Shipper will have the right within a reasonable period of time thereafter to picir, up the metering facilities from Transporter. Shipper's failure to so claim the metering facilities within ninety (90) days of Transporter's disconnection and removal thereof, shall constitute a waiver by Shipperof any right, title or interest in and to such metering facilities and all right, title and interest therein shall thereafter vest in Transporter. Transporter shall retain ownership of all equipment associated with the tap and tap valve installation. Notwithstanding the above, if adequate metering facilities are already inexistence at the Receipt and/or Delivery Points hereunder, such existing metering facilities shall be used and the party having title to such facilities shall retain title to such facilities. (c) The other party shalt have access to the metering party's metering equipment at all times, but the maintenance, calibration and adjustment thereof shall be done only by the employees or agents of the metering party. Reoords from such metering equipment shall remain the property of the metering party and shall be kept on file by said party for a period of not less than two (2) years. However, upon request of the other party, the metering party shalt make available to the other party volume records from its metering equipment, together with calculations therefrom, for inspection and verification, subject to return by the other party to the metering parry within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof. (d) The other party may, at its option and expense, install and operate meters, instruments and equipment, in a manner which will not interfere with the metering party's equipment, to check the metering party's meters, instruments and equipment, but the measurement of gas for the purpose J of this Agreement shall be by the metering patty's meter only, except as hereinafter specifically provided. The meters, check meters, Instruments and equipment installed by each party shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection or examination by the other parry, but the calibration and adjustment thereof shall be done only by the installing parry. (e) Each party shall give to the other party notice of the time of all tests of meters sufficiently in advance of such tests so that the other party may conveniently have its representatives present; provided however, that if either party has given such notice to the other party and such other party is not present at the time specified, then the party giving the notice may proceed with the test as though the other party were present. (f) Meter measurements computed by the metering party shall be deemed to be correct except where the meter is found to be inaccurate by as much as one percent (1%), fast or slow, or to have failed to register, in either of which cases the metering party shall repair or replace the meter. The quantity of gas delivered while the meter was inaccurate or failed to register shall be determined by the readings of the other parry's check meter, if installed and in good operating condition, or by correcting the error if the percentage of error is ascertainable by calibration or mathematical calculation. If not so ascertainable, then it shall be determined by estimating the quantity on a basis of deliveries under similar conditions when the meter was registering accurately. Such adjustments or correction shall be made only for one-half (y:) of the period which has elapsed since the previous test; provided however, such adjustment or correction period shall not exceed g8ndaNo - agendaalem ~ 74 r / ble SHEET N0.' 2 whichever is less, from the date such amount is due Transporter. Failure of Transporter to receive total reimbursement within thirty (30) days of Shipper's receipt of Transporter's invoice will allow Transporter to suspend and/or terminate this Agreetnet:t. It is understood that although Shipper shall reimburse Transporter for any tap valves, metering facilities and all associated costs incurred by Transporter in establishing any Receipt and/or Delivery Point, Shipper shall receive ownership of only the metering facilities and Transporter will be solely responsible for all activities in connection with said metering facilities, including, but not limited to, operation, testing, calibration, adjusting, repair and replacement (both at Shipper's expense), and maintenance, necessary for performance hereunder until Transporter disconnects and removes the metering facilities after termination of this Agreement. After said disconnection and removal, Shipper will have the right within a reasonable period of time thereafter to pick up the metering facilities from Transporter. Shipper's failure to so claim the metering facilities within ninety (90) days of Transporter's disconnection and removal thereof, shall constitute a waiver by Shipper of any right, title or interest in and to such metering facilities and all right, title and interest therein shall thereafter vest in Transporter. Transporter shall retain ownership of all equipment associated with the tap and tap valve installation. Notwithstanding the above, if adequate metering facilities are already in existence at the Receipt and/or Delivery Points hereunder, such existing metering facilities shall be used and the parry having title to such facilities shall retain title to such facilities. (c) The other party shell have access to the metering patty's metering equipment at all times, but the maintenance, calibration and adjustment thereof shall be done only by the employees or f agents of the metering party. Records from such metering equipment shall remain the property of ` the metering parry and shall be kept on file by said party for a period of not less than two (2) years. i However, upon request of the other party, the metering party shall make available to the other party volume records from its metering equipment, together with calculations therefrom, for inspection and verification, subject to return by the other party to the metering party within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof. (d) The other party may, at is option and expense, install and operate meters, instruments and equipment, in a manner which will not interfere with the metering party's equipment, to check the metering party's tatters, instruments and equipment, but the measurementofgas forthe purpose of this Agreement shall be by the metering party's meter only, except as hereinafter specifically provided. The meters, check meters, instruments and equipment installed by each party shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection or examination by the other party, but the calibration and adjustment thereof shall be done only by the installing party. (e) Each party shall give to the other party notice of the time of all tests of meters sufficiently in advance of such tests so that the other party may conveniently have its representatives present; provided, however, that if either party has given such notice to the other party and such other party is not present at the time specified, then the party giving the notice may proceed with the test as though the other party were present. (f) Meter measurements computed by the metering party shall be deemed to be correct except where the meter is found to be inaccurate by as much as one percent (1%), fast or slow, or to have failed to register, In either of which cases the metering party shall repair or replace the meter. The quantity of gas delivered while the meter was inaccurate or failed to register shall be determined by the readings of the other party's check meter, if installed and in good operating condition, or by correcting the error if the percentage of error is ascertainable by calibration or mathematical calculation. If not so ascertainable, then it shall be determined by estimating the quantityon a basis of deliveries under similar conditions when the meter was registering accurately. Such adjustments or correction shall be made only for one-half (ya) if the period which has elapsed since the previous test; provided however, such adjustment or correction period shall not exceed I geadaNc, ~y`7~ ~ 1aIE ~s ~~X/ SHEET 'O. 3 ninety (90) days. 3. Measurements (a) In gas measurement computations, the metering party may use the findings and rules o the Railroad Commission; with respect to flowing temperature, the metering parry shall at its expense properly install and operate a device of standard make to continuously determine or record flowing temperature. With respect to specific gravity, such shall be determined by "on-site" sampling and laboratory analysis or any other mutually agreeable method which is of standard industry practice (provided, however, that either party may at its expense properly install and operate a recording specific gravity instrument of standard make and in this event the specific gravity as recorded shall be used). (b) The meters for measurement of volumes at the Receipt Point(s) and Deli.very Point(s) hereunder shall be installed and operated, and computations shall be made, in accordance with current industry standards. The unit of measurement of gas shall be one thousand (1,000) cubic feet at a pressure base of fourteen and sixty-five one hundredths (14.65) pounds per square inch absolute and at a temperature base of sixty (60) degrees Fahrenheit. Meter measurements shall be computed by the measuring party into such units in accordance with the Ideal Gas Laws for volume variations due to metered pressure and corrected for deviation using daily averages of recorded specific gravity and flowing !emperature, or by using the calculated specific gravity determined by the method mentioned in paragraph (c) below. (c) The daily average heating value and specific gravity of the gas delivered hereunder by either patty may be determined by the use of BTU recording instruments of standard type, which may be installed and operated by the metering party at the metering point, or at such other point or points as are mutually agreeable to both parties; provided, however, if there is no BTU recording Instrument at a particular Receipt or Delivery Point specified herein or agreed upon hereunder, then the heating value and specific gravity of the gas at such point may be determined by "on-site" i sampling and laboratory analysis or any other mutually agreeable method which is of standard I industry practice. (d) The daily average meter pressure, specific gravity, flowing temperature and heating value shall be determined only during periods of time when the gas is actually flowing. 4.-ua' (a) Each party shall deliver to the other parry hereto natural gas which is of merchantable quality and is commercially free from water, hazardous substances, hydrocarbon liquids, bacteri a, and other objectionable liquids, solids or gas components. In addition, the gas delivered by each party shall specifically contain (i) not more than five one hundredths of one percent (.05%) oxygen, (ii) not more than five (5) grains of total sulphur consisting of not more than one quarter (K) grain of hydrogen sulphide and one (1) grain of mercaptan sulphur per one hundred (100) cubic feet of gas. (iii) not more than three percent (3%) by volume of carbon dioxide, (iv) not more than six percent (6%) by volume total non-hydrocarbon and Inca gases (including carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, helium, etc.), and (v) not more than seven pounds (7#) of water vapor per one million (1,000,000) Cubic feet of gas; provided, however, if Shipper tenders gas for transportation upstream of a dehydration plant, Transporter may waive Shipper's obligation to deliver dehydrated gas, subject to Transporter's continuing right to withdraw such waiver at any time in the future. The gas shall be at temperatures not in excessof one hundred twenty (I30) degrees Fahrenheit or less than forty (40) degrees Fahrenheit, provided that the gas s~Al have a hydrocarbon dew point not to exceed forty oil 40endaNo 4godafte 7 oete" SHE T NO. 4 (40) degrees Fahrenheit at the del: ,cry pressure, and shall have a heat content of not less than nine hundred fifty (950) or more than clev m hundred (1,100) British Thermal Units per cubic foot under the conditions of measurement contained herein; provided, however, if Shipper tenders gas for transport on Transporter's gathering system, such gas shall in addition to meeting the other quality specifications described herein, have a minimwa BTU content of one thousand (1,000) British Thermal Units under the conditions of measurement contained herein, but there shall not be a maximum BTU content or a minimum hydrocarbon dewpoint requirement for such gas. Transporter shall not be obligated to accept any gas delivered by Shipper (or its designee) hereunder which is not interchangeable with other gas in Transporter's pipeline at each Point of Receipt hereunder. Transporter's determination of such interchangeability shall be based upon a factor which is equivalent to the quotient obtained by dividing the total heating value of such gas, expressed in BTU's, by the square root of the specific gravity of such gas. Such factor must be within i7%a of the interchange factor established by Transporter for its system at each Receipt Point hereundtr, provided, however, if Shipper tenders gas for transport on Transport is gathering system, Transporter may waive Shipper's obligation to meet these interchangeability conditions, subject to Transporter's right to withdraw such waiver at any time in the future. (b) If at any time the gas fails to meet the quality specifications enumerated herein, the party receiving such gas shall notify the party delivering such gas, and the delivering party shall immediately correct such failure. If the delivering parry is unable or unwilling to deliver gas according to such specifications, the parry receiving such gas may refuse to accept delivery of gas hereunder for so long as such condition exists. 5. IM (a) Shipper agrees to pay Transporter, by way of reimbursement, all Taxes paid by Transporter with respect to the transport of gas and associated facilities related to the performance li of this Agreement. If any such Taxes paid by Transporter to any governmental authority are J calculated based upon the value of or price paid for the gas transported hereunder, Shipper shall disclose to Transporter the purchase price of such gas to enable Transporter to calculate and pay all such fees and taxes to appropriate governmental authorities in a timely manner. If Shipper fails or refuses to disclose the purchase price of such gas, Transporter shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving Shipper ten (10) days' prior written notice; and Shipper hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Transporter harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, losses or expenses, including attomeys' fees, which Transporter may incur as a result of Shipper's failure or refusal to disclose the purchase price of gas transported hereunder. (b) The term "Taxes" as used herein, shall mean all taxes and fees levied upon and/or paid by Transporter (other than ad valorem, capital stock, income or excess profit taxes, except as provided herein, general franchise taxes imposed on corporations on account of their corporate existence or on their right to do business within the state as a foreign corporation and similar taxes), including, but not limited to, gross receipts tax, street and alley rental fees agreed upon in franchise ordinances, licenses, fees and other charges levied, assessed or made by any governmental authority transportation fearebased payable on the upon the v,oluume, heat contenttvelueor sallees/purchase price of the which taxes or fees hereunder. i 6. Billine, Accounti nand Reports (a) on approximately the 15th day of each month, Transporter shall render to Shipper a gennaNu 9 Agendalt gat y we 7' SHEET NO. 5 statement for the preceding month showing the Mcf and MMBtu delivered at the Receipt Point(s) and Delivery Point(s); the amount of compensation due to Transporter hereunder, including the tax reimbursement; and other reasonable and pertinent information which is necessary to explain and support same and any adjustments made by Transporter in determining the amount billed. (b) Shipper shall pay Transporter twelve (12) days from the earlier of (i) the date Transporter's statement is deposited postage prepaid In the United States mail, or (ii) the date such statement is faxed to Shipper pursuant to Paragraph 8.2 of Article VIII hereunder, for gas transported hereunder during the preceding month, or as to payment which is otherwise due hereunder, according to the measurements, computations and rates herein provided. Transporter hereby agrees, however, that Shipper may pay any such statement by bank wire transfer bydirecting the bank wire transfer to Lone Star Gas Company at Texas Commt rce Bank, Dallas, Texas, ABA No. 111001150, for deposit to Lone Star Gas Company Accoun! No. 05805016795. To assure propf r credit, Shipper should designate the company name, invoice number and amount being paid in the Fedwire Text Section. If the invoiced amount of any payment iue Is mot paid when due, interest on all unpaid amounts shall accrue at the rate of one and one half percent (lyi%) per month, or the highest rate allowed by law, whichever is less, from the date such.:-i,ount is due Transporter; provided, however, no interest shall accrue on unpaid amounts when a% to make payment is the result of a bona fide dispute bem-cen the parties hereto regarding PL .4 amounts and Shipper timely pays all amounts not 0 dispute. (c) Each party hereto shall have the right at all reasonable times to examine the measurement records and charts of the other party to the extent necessary to verify the accuracy of any statement, charge, computation or demand made under or pursuant to any of the provisions in this Agreement. If any such examinations reveal any inaccuracy in such billing theretofore made, the necessary adjustments in such billing and payment shall be made; provided, that no adjustments for any billing or payment shall be made for any inaccuracy claimed after the lapse of twenty five (25) months from the rendition of the invoice relating thereto. 7. Responsibility `J Shipper shall be deemed to be in control and possession of the gas until such gas shall have been delivered to Transporter at the Receipt Point(s) and after such gas shall have been delivered at the Delivery Point(s). Transporter shall be deemed to be in control and possession of the gas after receipt of the gas at the Receipt Point(s) and until such gas shall have been delivered to Shipper (or for its aoeount) at the Delivery Point(s). Each party shall have responr:bility for gas handled hereunder, or for anything which may be done, happen or arise with respect to such gas, only when such gas is In its control and possession as aforisaid. Each party shall be responsible for any damage or injuries caused thereby until the same shall have been delivered to the other party at the Receipt Point(s) or Delivery Point(s), except injuries and damages which shall be occasioned solely and proximately by the negligence of the receiving party. 8. Warranty Shipper warrants to Transporter that at the time of delivery of gas hereunder it will have good title or the right to deliver such gas, and that such gas shall be free and clear of all liens and adverse claims, and Shipper agrees to indemnify Transporter agaim;t all suits, actions, debts, accounts, damages, costs (including attorne) s' fees), losses and expenses arising from or out of any adverse claims of any and all persons to or against said gas. igenOaIO ~ Ageelte S Date _ SHEET NO. 6 9. Force Mecure (a) In the event either parry is rendered unable, wholly or in part, by force majeure to carry out its obligations under this Agreement, except the obligation to pay monies due hereunder, it is agreed that, on such party's giving notice and reasonably full particulars of such force majeure, in writing or by telecopy, to the other parry within a reasonable time after the occurrence of the cause relied on, the obligations of the party giving such notice, so far as they are affected by such force majeure, shall be suspended during the continuance of any inability so caused, but for no longer period, and such cause shall, so far as possible, be remedied with all reasonable dispatch. (b) The term "force majeure", as employed herein, shall mean acts of God; strikes, lockouts or other industrial disturbances; acts of the public enemy, wars, blockades, insurrections, civil disturbances and riots, and epidemics; landslides, lightning, earthquakes, fires, storms, floods and i washouts; arrests, orders, directives, restraints and requi rements of the government and governmental agencies, either federal or state, civil and military; and application of governmental conservation rules and regulations; explosions, breakage or accident to machinery or lines of pipe; outages (shutdowns) of power plant equipment or lines of pipe for inspection, maintenance or repair; freezing of welts or lines of pipe; and any other causes, whether of the kind enumerated or otherwise, not reasonably within the control of the party claiming suspension. It is understood and agreed that the settlement of strikes or lockouts shall be entirely within the discretion of the parry having the difficulty, and that the above reasonable dispatch shall not require the settlement of strikes or lockout, by acceding to the demand of the opposing patty when such course is or is deemed to be inadvisable or inappropriate in the discretion of the parry having the difficulty. 10. Waiver of Breaches Defaults or Ri" No waiver by either party hereto of any one or more breaches, defaults or droits under any provisions of this Agreement shall operate or be construed as a waiver of any other breaches, 1 defa,rlts or rights, whether of a like or of a different character. By providing written notice to the other parry, either party may assert any right not previously asserted hereunder or may assert its right to object to a default not previously protested. Except as specifically provided herein, in the event of any dispute. under this Agreement, the parties shall, notwithstanding the pendency of such dispute, diligently proceed with the performance of this Agreement without prejudice to the rights of either party. It. Remedy for Breach Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, if either party shall fail to perform any of the covenants or obligations Imposed upon It in this Agreement (except where such failure shall be excused under the provisions of Section 9 hereof), then, and in that event, the other party may, at its option (without waiving any other remedy for breach hereof), by notice in writing specifying wherein the default has occurred, indicate such party's election to terminate this Agreement by reason thereof; provided, however, that Shipper's failure to pay Transporter within a period of ten (10) days following Shipper's receipt of written notice from Transporter advising of such failure to make payment in full vAthin the time specified in Section 6 hereof, shall be a default which shall give Transporter the right to immediately terminate this Agreement, unless such failure to pay such amounts is the result of a bona fide dispute between the parties hereto regarding such amounts hereunder and Shipper timely pays all amounts not in dispute. With respect to any other matters, the party in default shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of such notice to remedy such default, j 1 1 AgendaNo q~ pis Adendall Date - SHEET ISO. 7 and upon failure to do so, this Agreement shall terminate from and after the expiration of such thirty (30) day period. Such termination shall be an additional remedy and shall not prejudice the right of the party not in default to collect any amounts due it hereunder for any damage or loss suffered by it and shall not waive anyother remedy to which the party not in default may be entitled for breach of this Agreement. 12. Anolicab~____lo Law THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY AGREE THAT THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF T1-XAS, LAW NOTWTHSTAND PRINCIPLES THAT I E THE API PLIC TIA ON OF THECT OF LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTI NIGHT RQUU i i l 1 i I i 1 I' s MCOUN( i i i ..rw• I i ♦ f 4 • I I I ::\VPD0CS10QAPURCH.GA% i~ - ID*' - l0 9 9 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF GAS FROM LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, SUCH PURCHASE BEING AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE, I!. ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PUR- CHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDDING; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government code provides for the procurement of items that are available from only one source, such as electricity, gas, water and other utility services without submitting such items to competitive bidding; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to purchase gas from Lone Star Gas Company at those times when the gas transportation system sup- plying gas to Denton's Spencer Station does not have the capability of supplying gas from the City's primary gas suppliers; and WHEREAS, Lone Star Gas Company has occasionally supplied natural gas to the City as a sole source from January 1, 1994 through the effective date of this ordinance without a formal contract; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of sole source gas from Lone Star Gas Company as of January 1, 1994; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract with Lone Star Gas Company for the purchase of J gas under the conditions set forth therein, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit A. SECTION ii. That by the execution of said contract, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount of, and in accordance with the written contract made pur- suant thereto, and ratifies the expenditure of funds necessary to compensate Lone Star Gas Company for all gas supplied the City from January 1, 1994 through the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immed- iately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1994. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ` j r a Z-q A$endalt oats 9 ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY Lr~ X Cam' ~ct c • C BY. I r i I >s; i i 1 i t 1 PAGE 2 to rilll. ~endatfo q~~•~ t •Agendaltofn EXHIBIT III Date 7-9 GAS SALES CCNTRaQT LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, ,erein called 'Seller,' whose mailing address is 3U1 South Harwood, Attention: Gas Marketing Division, Dallas, Texas 75201 agrees to sell and deliver natural gas to the CITY OF DENTON, hereln called 'Buyer,' whose mailing address is City of Denton Municipal Utilities, 1701-A Spencer Road, Denton, Texas 76205 and Buyer agrees to purchase and receive such gas from Seller for use in Buyer's Spencer Steam Electric Station located in Denton, Texas, subject to and in accordance with all the terms and conditions contained in this Contract. This Contract shall be effective January 1, 1994 and shall cover service for a primary term of the five (51 years, and year-to-year thereafter, provided that either party may cancel this Contract t written end of the primary term, or at the end of any year subsequent to the primary term, by p'n' g notice to the other party at least thirty (301 days prior to the effective date of such cancellation. This Contract covers Buyer's plant protection gas requirements (i.e., the minimum gas required to prevent physical harm to the plant facilities or danger to plant personnel when such protection cannot be afforded through the use of an alternate fuel) up to one thousand (1,000) MMBtu per day. Buyer shall not use gas under this Contract for service other than that classified by Seller as Electric Generation. The gas delivered hereunder is for the use of Buyer and shall not be redelivered or resold to others. Bills rendered for gas delivered hereunder shall be payable at P. 0. Box 910255, Dallas, Texas 75391-0255, or such other address as may be from time to time designated by Seller upon reasonable notice. This Contract includes the additional terms, provisions and conditions contained in Articles I through VIII entitled 'General Terms,' which are attached hereto and shall be a part of this Contract, and such 'General Terms' shall be applicable to the service rendered hereunder. This Contract shall be binding upon both parties and their successors and assigns, but shall not be assignable by Buyer without the written consent of Seller, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 1994. WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF as of the day of , CITY OF DENTON LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, a Division of ENSERCH CORPORATION BY By Title Title 'SELLER" OBUYER' Attest Attest - T ~erldaNa y~~ • ~ge~dalte u~9 STATE OF COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared of CITY OF DENTON, a municipal corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration 4 therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the day of . A. D., Notary Public in and for County, My commission expires the day of 19 i STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS i i i I BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Vice President of LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, a Division of ENSERCH Corporation, a Texas corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the some for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, in the capacity therein stated, and as the act and deed of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE, this the day of . A.D., 19_ Notary Public in and for County, My commission expires the day of 19 i I h VendaNo gendailer+iD rate .7-1 ' 509 QENERAL TERM 1. (81 The as delivered hereunder shall be measured at a meter location by standard meter or meters owned and operated by Sillier at the Spencer Steam Electric Station, located in Denton, Texas. Buyer shall use due care to protect Seller's property which is located on Buyer's premises from damage and shall permit no person other than an agent of Seller, or a person otherwise lawfully authorized, so tamper with, inspect or remove same. All property belonging to Seller and located on Buyer's premises shall be removable by Seller at ary time during the term of this Contract and within a reasonable time after Its termination, title thereto remaining in Seller at all times. Seller shall have full and free Ingress to and egress from Buyer's premises for the construction, inspection, maintenance, repair and removal of Sellers's property thereon or for any purpose connected with the service of gas hereunder. Measurement records shall remain the property of Seller and shall be kept on fife by Seller for a period of not less than two (2) years. Upon request of Buyer, Seller shall submit to Buyer records from its metering equipment, together with calculations therefrom, for Buyer's inspection and verification, subject to return by Buyer within ten 0 0) days after receipt thereof. Ibl For the purpose of this Contract the unit of measurement shall be one thousand (1,000) cubic feet of gas at an absolute pressure of fourteen and sixty-five one-hundredths (14.65) pounds per square inch and a base temperature of sixty degrees (600) Fahrenheit, All volume%of gas measured shall be adjusted by computation in accordance with the Ideal Gas Laws, corrected for deviation, from the pressure and temperature conditions set forth in the immediately preceding sentence. In such computations, a value of 60 deg ees (6001 Fahrenheit shall be used for the flowing temperature of the gas; however, Seller, at its sole option, may install standard recording temperature instruments on Seller's meter and correct the volume measured based on the actual flowing temperature of the gas. (c) Meter measurements computed by Seller according to its standard operating practices shall be conclusive except for when the meter is found to be inaccurate by as much as one percent 096) kk fast or slow or failed to register, in either of which cases Seller shall repair or replace the meter. The J quantity of gas delivered while the meter was inaccurate or failed to register shall be determined by correcting the error if the percentage of error is ascertainable by calibration test or mathematical calculation. If not so ascertainable, then it shalt bo determined by estimating the quantity on a basis of deliveries under similar conditions when the meter was registering accurately. No adjustment or correction for meter inaccuracy or failure shall be made for a period longer than ninety (90) days. II. Seller shall deliver for receipt by Buyer natural gas which is of merchantable quality and Is commercially free from water, hazardous substances, hydrocarbon liquids, bacteria, and other objectionable liquids, solids of gas components. In addition, the gas delivered shall specifically contain (i) not more than five one hundredths of one percent 1.0596) oxygen, Iii) not more than five 15) grains of total sulphur consisting of not more than one quarter I YO grain of hydrogen sulphide and one (1) grain of mercaptan sulphur per one hundred 0001 cubic feet of gas, (ifi) not more than three percent 13%) by volume of carbon d oxide, (iv) not more than six percent 16%1 by volume total non- hydrocarbon and inert gases Including carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, helium, etc,l, and (v) not more than seven 170) of water vapor per one million 0,000,0001 cublc feet of gas. The gas shall be at temperatures not in excess of one hundred twenty degrees 112001 Fahrenheit or less than forty degrees (4001 Fahrenheit, prov'ded that the gas shall have a hydrocarbon dew point not to exceed AgendaNo q OZ Agendalter~ 7 ^ Oata_ 9- 2! Z forty degrees 14001 Fahrenheit at the delivery pressure, and shall have a heat content of not less~~ nine hundred fifty (950) cr more than eleven hundred 11,1001 British Thermal Units per cubic foot under the conditions of measurement contained herein. Ill. Gas shall be delivered to Buyer at Seller's operating pressure at the Point of Delivery. The Point of Delivery of gas to Buyer hereunder shall be at the outlet flange of Seller's regulating and metering stations on the sites of Buyer's Spencer Steam Electric Station, at which point the title to and ownership of the gas shall vest in Buyer. Buyer understands that under no circumstances shall Seller ever be obligated to attempt to deliver gas at a pressure in excess of seventy five (751 psig Into Buyer's Spencer Steam Electric Station located in Denton, Texas. Seiler shall not be liable forany loss, damage, or injury resulting from the gas or its use after it reaches the aforesaid Point of Delivery, all risks thereof and therefrom being hereby assumed by Buyer. IV. Seller cannot and does not guarantee a constant supply of gas to Buyer hereunder and shall have the right at any and all times, with notice if practicable, to curtail or interrupt, In whole or in part, the supply of gas hereunder. Buyer agrees that Seller shall never be liable in damages or otherwise on account of having exercised such rights and agrees to curtail or discontinue the use of gas hereunder when requested by Seller to do so. Seller and Buyer recognize that Buyer Is classified as an 'electric generation' customer pursuant to Seller's filed Tariffs, as well as Texas Railroad Commission Order 496 for purposes of curtailment of gas service by Seller hereunder, Such curtailment priority shall be effective during the term hereof until such time as such Order may be emended, replaced, or superseded. Inability or failure of Seller to deliver or Buyer to receive gas or perform under this Contract, shall not be the basis of claims for damages sustained by either party or for breach of contract when due to Act of God or governmental authority, the elements, labor troubles, fires, accidents, breakage, repair or change of or obstructions In pipelines, equipment or machinery, depletion or failure of gas supply, fluctuations in gas pressure, low gas pressure, high gas pressure, demands in excess of the capacity of Seller's equipment, pipelines, or sources of gas supply, or other causes or contingencies reasonably beyond the control of either party hereto. If Buyer considers continuity of its fuel service essential to the public welfare, then Buyer shall provide stand-by fuel and equipment adequate to meet its fuel requirements during periods of interruption of gas service under this Contract. V. (a) The price payable by Buyer for the gas to be delivered hereunder during each month of the term hereof shall be an amount per MMStu equal to Seller's weighted average cost of gas during such month, plus a base rate of thirty-eight cents 15.38) per MMBtu. Such base price shall escalate one cent 1!.01) beginning on January 1, 1995 and annually thereafter during the term of this Contract. (bl The term 'weighted average price' of gas purchased by Seller shall mean the weighted average price per one thousand (1,000) cubic feet of all gas purchased by Seller during the month, computed to the nearest one-hundredth of one cent (C00011 1, and shall be determined by dividing the total dollar amount paid or accrued on Seller's books during such month for all gas purchased by Seller by the total number of thousands of cubic feet of gas purchased by Seller during such month, adjusted to the same pressure base as gas sold hereunder, and shall Include, in addition to the cost of gas itself, any production, severance, dedication, )r gathering tax paid or accrued by Seller directly or by way of reimbursement to its gas suppliers, to producers, processors, transporters, or other sellers of gas; -T a f ~gendaNo ~ S s'~--` igenlia)t7 Iq- Ry ' file provided, if any portion of the Cost of gas which has been paid by Seller is refunded to Seller, or-7ol 9 Seller is required by the terms of any gas purchase contract, or of any agreed settlement of a disputed claim, or by a determination or judgement of a regulatory body or court having or asserting jurisdiction, to make retroactive payments with respect to gas which has been or may be purchased by Seller, or if billing corrections are made with respect to gas previously purchased by Seller, then such payments, refunds, or corrections shall be included in Seller's determination of the weighted average price of gas for the month during which any such payments, refunds or corrections occur. (c) Additionally, Buyer hereby agrees to pay Seller each and every month, an amount of two thousand each ~aOnd) evplus any and ery month of the l additional term hereof taxes rega regardless a of whether r mount shalt be payable to dollars not Seller is actually called upon to supply gas hereunder to Buyer. (d) Buyer agrees to pay Seller, by way of reimburrement, all taxes and fees levied upon and/or paid by Seller (other than ad valorem, capital stock, income or excess profit taxes, general franchise taxes imposed on corporations on account of their corporate existence or on their right to do business within the state as a foreign corporation and similar taxes), including, but not limited to, gross receipts tax, street and alley rental fees agreed upon in franchise ordinances, licenses, fees and other chargos levied, assessed or made by any governmental authority on the act, right or privilege of Seller selling and delivering gas to Buyer hereunder. Vt. lot If Buyer shall fail to pay bills for services within twelve (12) days from the date they are rendered hereunder or shall otherwise default under this Contract, Seller may suspend service and deliveries of gas and such suspension shall not prevent enforcement by Seller of any other of its legal rights. Additionally, in the event Buyer fails to pay bills for service when due, Buyer agrees to pay interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum, or the highest rate allowed by law, whichever is less, on such past due amounts. (b) if an inaccuracy in a statement and/or payment hereunder should ever be discovered, the E necessary adjustments in such statement andlor payment shall be promptly made; provided, however, that no adjustments for any statement and/or payment shall be made for any inaccuracy claimed after the lapse of twenty-five (25) months from the date payment for such statement is due. Vil. (a) This Contract is expressly made subject to all future valid rules, orders or regulations of duly constituted government, I authorities having jwisdiction over the subject matter hereof. (b) If any provision hereof shall be held by any duly constituted governmental authority to be illegal, void or unenforceable, such provision shall be of no force and effect, but the illegality or unenforceability shall have no effect upon and shall not impair the enforceability of any other provision of this Contract. Vill. This Contract supersedes and replaces that certain contract dated January 1, 1990 between the parties hereto, or their respective predecessors in interest, for gas at the location and for the purposes herein designated; however, the requirement to make payment of any amount(s) due under such preceding contract shall not be extinguished. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement I t i genda No la~L ;gelldaitefn~ s 7 s between the parties and there are no other representations, warranties, understandings or other $0i9 agreements, except as set forth herein, and this Contract may not be modified except in writing. Waiver by either party of a particular right or default hereunder shall not be deemed a waiver of other rights or defaults whether similar or dissimilar, If any provision hereof shall be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, void or unenforceable, such provision shall be of no force and effect, but the illegality or unenforceability shall have no effect s-pon and shall not impair the enforceability of any other provision of this Contract, THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY AGREE THAT THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE CONSTRUED ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, i NOTWITHSTANDING ANY CONFLICT OF LAW PRINCIPLESTHAT MIGHTREOUIRE THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION. i i ccldenton-2.gscllp 5-18.94 i i d S , 2 1 LONE STAR GAS TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT AND PLAN~Ta~o - 22 rROrrcrroN GAS SALES CONTRACT A h hgendalt oats *7 I Ilardcr Said in January. the Utility staff presented a roiew of the key contract 0~R 2 provisions of the proposed Transportation and Plant Protection Sales Contract to 3 the Board. At that time the Board reviewed the terms of the proposed contracts 4 and recommended that the contract terms with Lone Star Gas be finalized and 5 brought back to the Board for final contract approval recommendation. Since the 6 January meeting the Legal Department has stated that a formal bid process must 7 be completed, regardless of the negotiations with Lone Star. The bid process has g been completed with Lone Star Gas submitting the low bid per the terms of 11 9 proposed contract. Conley made a motion that the contract be approved with 10 Legal department revisions. Thompson seconded the motion. Motion passed t1 unanimously, all ayes, no nays. 12 13 3, CONSIDER APPROVAL OF DIRECTIONAL BORING SYSTEM - BID 14 01630 { i 13 harder said staff had investigated the following options prior to the bid process: 6 1) to purchase a new boring machine with underground placement supplemented 7 by use of present boring machine; 2) to effectively leave the business or boring is completely by contracting out boring machines; or 3) to rely on trenching 19 completely. The staff recommends accepting the low bid which meet L0 specifications for a directional boring system from the Plank Company on the Bor- 21 Mor 1500. (Their alternative bid on the demonstration unit came with "full 22 manufacturer's warranty" for both the drilling machine and other associated t a s \draf train. 4 } E l CITY COUNCI 'k - o ti C a~ e ~ e 4 ~ c ~ GG~oo~O , ,~No y Oda n DATOO CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council OO FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: UTILITY SERVICE DEPOSIT ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached revisions to the Utility Service Deposit Ordinance (i.e., Chapter 26 of the ode of Ordinances). MMARY: The attachment contains basically two 12) changes to our current ordinance and procedures. The first change adds an acceptable score/ranking on a risk model assessment, or any additional evaluation, to the conditions for waiving a service deposit. This change was discussed with the City Council during January of this year when we presented the Customer Service enhancements. The current trend among municipal utilities is to eliminate the requirement of unnecessary deposits. This reduces a burden on customers and assists, in some degree, with economic development. Attached is an article that appeared in the November 1, 1993 issue of the Public Power Weekly that describes the success of Colorado Springs efforts. The second significant change in the proposed ordinance primarily affects commercialCndustrial customers. The change will allow a surety bond or irrevocable letter of credit to be accepted in lieu of a deposit. It has been our practice to accept both of these items in lieu of a deposit; however, the ordinance has never been updated. Approval of this change will allow our practice as well as the ordinance to be synonymous. It is our t+elief that the latter change will reduce a significant burden on businesses that are currently in our community and those that are considering locating in our community. DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED: The Customer Service Division and the Utility Department will be affected by the approval of the proposed revisions to the ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no expenditure associated with the approval of the attached revisions to the ordinance. Respe lly sub i ed: LI yd V. Harrell, City M alter Ptspusd 9n Harlan L. Jefferson Aawavsd M: AFFOOA97 µab Y 4 r Alp* No Apbn 2 -T,T D A Taltb.luiw.l.S,-}=384-_ CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: UTILITY SERVICE DEPOSIT ORDINANCE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached revisions to the Utility Service Deposit Ordinance (i.e., Chapter 26 of the Code of Ordinances). UMMARY: The attachment contains basically two (2) changes to our current ordinance and procedures. The first change adds an acceptable score/ranking on a risk model assessment, or any additional evaluation, to the conditions for waiving a service deposit. This change was discussed with the City Council during January of this year when we presented the Customer Service enhancements. The current trend among municipal utilities is to eliminate the requirement of unnecessary deposits. This reduces a burden on customers and assists, in some degree, with economic development. Attached is an article that appeared in the November 1, 1993 issue of the Public Power Weekly that describes the success of Colorado Springs efforts. The second significant change in the proposed ordinance primarily affects commercial/industrial customers. The change will allow a surety bond or irrevocable letter of credit to be accepted in lieu of a deposit. It has been our practice to accept both of these items in lieu of a deposit; however, the ordinance has never been updated. Approvsl of this change will allow our practice as well as the ordinance to be synonymous. It is our belief that the latter change will reduce a significant burden on businesses that are currently in our community and those that are considering locating in our community. DEPARTMENTS AFFECTED: The Customer Service Division and the Utility Department will be affected by the approval of the proposed revisions to the ordinance. FISLCA! IMPACT: There is no expenditure associated with the approval of the attached revisions to the ordinance. Respe7+IIy sub i ed: Llcyd V. Harrell, City M ager v,cwna W; Harlan L. Jefferson APpm"d by: AFWA97 i t l f L t i_ -s a Y 1 t Et WpD0CS\000\uT1L1fT ~endaNo. 3 Agendalte Date Z ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTIONS 26-3 THROUGH 26-7 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, BY ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR DEPOSITS FOR UTILITY RECEIVED FROM THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE ATE. SERVICES THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HERESY ORDAINS: cFCT~ION I. That section 26-3, section 26-4, Section 26-5, and inances of the Cit Section a26-6 of soe thate saidr sections shall hereafterenreton ad sas hereby follows: Sao. 26-3. Servlo~% deposits. (a) Exemption from deposit for residenti l ser ide. No service deposit will be requiredof can aprovide one (1) of the utility service if the applicant following: (1) An acceptable credit rating for the last twelve tem periodthastto litbe se mo the customer service f ornanother electric utilitydcompany. from the last two years. The applicant must provide the city a letter 3 of credit for verification. (2) A cosigner who is currently receiving utility service from the city and who hac an acceptable credit rating with 1 the city utility system and will execute a written guarantee to guarantee payment of the applicant's utility bills. (3) A member of the applicant's immediate family, i.e. parent child, or sibling, who has received service from another electric utility corpany within the past two years with an accep- table credit rating for the past twelve (12) months becomes a co- applicant, agreeing in writing to pay the account should the customer fail to make payment. (4) An acceptable licant's credit approved by sthencity other evaluation of an applicant's council. For purposes of this chapter, "acceptable credit rating" shall mean a credit rating which is based upon a formula approved by the and "unacceptable city council. An "excellent credit rating" credit rating" shall refer c to credit ratings which are based upon a formula approved by j k 4gendaNo _ %_A) Zz~ 4gendalle l7 Date 3 (b) Exemption from deposit for commercial service. An ap- plicant for utility service for a commercial or industrial entity or business may not be required to make a deposit if the applicant: 1) Provides the city an acceptable commercial/ credit rating for the last twenty-four months the customer industrial service from the city utility system. The period has to be within the three years prior to the date of application. credit ref- erences from residential utility accounts are not accepted for exemptions of commercial/industrial deposits; or to the city (forD review and verification, current rrelevant financial information which may include: annual reports, information from zscognized financial rating agencies, information from credit reporting agencies, references from other electric utility sup- pliers; and such other financial data that the city manager or his designate may require. (c) Deposit alternatives. If the credit of a commercial/ industrial customer for service has not been established satisfac- torily to the city, the applicant may provide a surety bond or an irrevocable letter of credit in lieu of a deposit. The bond must be executed by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Texas. The letter of credit must be executed by a Texas bank to the satisfaction of the city manager and city attorney. The cus- tomer must maintain the surety bond, or where applicable, the letter of credit, in effect at all times. If the customer allows the bond or letter of credit to expire, the customer shall pay a deposit in the amount provided in Sec. 26-4 or the city may -J terminate utility service. f (d) Deposit due. If one (1) of the conditions in subsections (a), (b), or (c) above cannot be met, then the customer requesting utility service will be required to deposit an amount as provided for herein before receiving utility service from the city. With regard to subsection (a), the city may provide service for up to twenty (20) days while the applicant attempts to meet the exemption requirements. The city shall notify applicant that service will be terminated if the applicant does not meet the requirements for exemption. In addition, a customer may be required to pay a deposit if: (1) the customer has been terminated from receipt of utility service due to non-payment of a utility bill. (2) the city has determined there is evidence of tampering with the customers meter; the city does notehave tineits files an current b cosigner or applicaand nt who meets the requirements of Sec. 26-3(a); PAGE 2 -~gendaNo ' AgeodVem h Date (4) the customer has been required to pay or is paying off a utility account balance previously deemed uncollectible. (5) the customer has filed a petition for relief under the applicable provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code; or (6) the customer's letter of credit or surety bond filed with the city in lieu of a deposit has expired. eeo. 26-4. Amount of deposit. (a) Residential customers. If a customer receiving resi- dential service is required to make a deposit, the amount of the the equal to one-sixth of the location where service last is twelve deposit (12)11months50 bior an llingamount requested. (b) Commercial customers. In fothe r case of ico commercial to t industrial service, if the applicant make a deposit, the amount of the deposit shall be $300 or an amount equal to one-sixth of the last twelve months of billing at } the location where service is requested, whichever is greater. If for l, a no previous history is avai facility lwhere tservicetisnrequest d swill ibe facility similar to the avail j used to establish the amount of the deposit. (c) additional deposits. The city may require a customer to make an additional deposit or in the event that a deposit made as (b) is subsequently determined to no specified in subsection (a) longer be sufficient. In no event will the amount of the deposit exceed 1/6 of the last twelve months' billing at the service location. The city may disconnect service if the customer does not remit the additional deposit within ten (10) days of the city's request provided a written disconnect notice has been issued. disconnect notice may be issued concurrently with the written request for thn additional deposit. (d) Interest. The city shall pay interest on deposits at an adjustable rate. The rate of interest will be adjusted semi- annually, on October 1 and April 1 of each year, to equal the in- terest rate of a one year United States Treasury note. If a refund of the deposit is made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the if the deposit, no interest will i payment of.interest dshall isretroactiveretained than thirty ( (30) 30) days, P the date the entire amount of deposit has been made. The deposit shall cease to draw interest on the date it is returned or credited to the customer's account. shall m de at tho time the deposit is returned or creditedutoothe customer's account. PAGE 3 e agendaNo Age~daltem (late (4) the customer has been required to pay or is paying off a utility account balance previously deemed uncollectible. (5) the customer has filed a petition for relief under the applicable provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code; or (6) the customer's letter of credit or surety bond filed with the city in lieu of a deposit has expired. Sec. 26-4. Amount of deposit. 1 (a) Residential customers. If a customer receiving resi- dential service is required to make a deposit, the amount of the twelve deposit shall 1) m months' bior an lling amount at the location where service last requested. (b) Commercial customers. In the case of commercial or industrial service, if the applicant for service is required to make a deposit, the amount of the deposit shall be $300 or an amount equal to one-sixth of the last twelve months of billing at the location where service is requested, whichever is greater. If no previous history is available for the location service is nt tiv will facility e similar to the type where Z used to establish the amount of the deposit. (c) Additional deposits. The city may require a customer to the event that a deposit made as additional make an specified insubsection o(a) or in (b) is subsequently determined to no longer be sufficient. In no event will the amount of the deposit exceed 1/6 of the last twelve months' billing at the service location. The city may disconnect service if the customer the does not remit the additional deposit within ten (10) days of city's request provided a written disconnect notice has been issued. Such disconnect notice may be issued concurrently with the written request for the additional deposit. (d) Interest. The city shall pay interest on deposits at an adjustable rate. The rate of interest will be adjusted semi- annually, on October 1 and April 1 of each year, to equal the in- terest rate of a one year United States Treasury note. If a refund of the deposit is made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the if the deposit, no interest 30) days will bepaid. interest dshall Isretroactiveretained than thirty ( days, payment the date the entire amount of deposit has been made. The deposit shall cease to draw interest on the date it is returned or credited to the customer's account. Payment of the interest to the customer shall made at the time the deposit is returned or credited to the customer's account. PAGE 3 genflaNo,~2~ dgendaltem.~~ 0318 7- 9 / soap (e) credit checks. After making application for service, the customer service department may pursue a credit reference check. The customer will be given service promptly after application, but if the credit check shows the customer does not have an acceptable credit rating, the customer will be required to produce a cosigner or place a deposit. Failure to do so will result in the discontin- uance of service with no less than two (2) days of notification given in writing, to the prospective customer by the customer ser- vice department. See. 26-5. Refunds of deposits. The city shall refund deposits to appl;cants and customers if one of the following events occurs: (a) The customer's service has been disconnected. The city ` shall refund the deposit plus accrued interest less any outstanding balances. A transfer of service from one service location to another shall not be deemed a disconnection and the city shall not require an additional deposit unless authorized by Sec. 26-3 or Sec. 26-4 hereof. (b) when the customer has paid bills for service for twelve consecutive residential billings or twenty-four consecutive com- mercial or industrial billings without having service disconnected for non-payment of bills or meter tampering And with no more than two occasions each year in which a bill was delinquent as provided by Sec. 26-6 (a), provided the customer is not delinquent in the payment of the current bill. The city shall refund the deposit (plus accrued interest) to the customer in the form of cash or credit to a customer's bill or release the customer's surety bond or irrevocable letter of credit. See. 26-6. Other fees. (a) Connection and transfer fees. A connection fee in an amount established by the city council and on file in the office of the city secretary will be charged to new customers requesting water and/or electric service, and a transfer fee in an amount established by the city council and on file in the office of the city secretary will be charged existing customers for transferring from one (1) location to another. (b) Reconnect fee and deposit. If water and/or electric utility service is disconnected for nonpayment, then the customer will be required to pay a reconnect fee in an amount established by the city council and on file in the office of the city secretary and maintain a deposit sum equal to one-sixth of the last twelve (12) months' billings on billing at the location where service is requested. M i 9 7 i i 'y PAGE 4 i i ~penoaho 9y' 4ge+~da11 -~q- t7/ gate g $fCTION II. That the City Council approves the Risk Model Assessment and the formula for determining unacceptable, accep- table, and excellent credit ratings attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III. That Section 26-4 through Section 26-8 of the Code of ordinances are hereby renumbered, respectively to Section 26-7 through Section 26-11. v SECTION IV. That Section 26-6 (a) (Billing and collection for services), renumbered to Section 26-9 (a), is hereby amended so that said subsection shall be and read as follows: sec. 26-9. Billing and collection for services. (a) Due date for payment of statements. The cue date for the payment of the bill for utility services shall not be less than fifteen (15) days after issuance. Payment must be received in the city cashier's office by close of business on the due date, in order to avoid assessment of a penalty. Payments placed in the mail and showing a postmark on the due date will not be considered as being received on the due date. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immed- iately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. a j BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR F r { ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 5 i 1. • F genllaf~o 9 ~ . ,gendalttf[rL,l~ ~ CREDITMOLLECTIONS SECTION DEFINITIONS FOR CREDIT RATING Credit ratings are functional measurements applied to customer Service credit lity operations. For new residential customers, credit ratings determine ag eacceptab'For of Letters of Credit, Co-Signer's agreements, and Co•A edit raters may determine whether l or not the customer twill sbe requi ed to pay a deposit. a Two criteria make up the credit rating: 1. Credit history 2. Returned check history Below are the credit ratings used by the City of Denton: 1. Excellent No late payments over the past twelve (12) billings No returned checks t 2. Acceptable payments at i No more than two (2) late payments, i.e., two (2) pay Credit History Code 2 or higher, over the past twelve (12) billings No returned checks t I 3. Unacceptable j' Three (3) or more late payments, i.e., three (3) payments at Credit History Code 2 or higher, over the past twelve (12) billings One or more returned checks 0 o,t;,,rA for Det rminina Credit 8a in : The credit hlstory is located in the upper right hand corner of the credit history screen with late payments flagging on a progressive scale of zero (0) through six (6). Code 0 Total bill paid by due rate. 1 Total bill paid between penalty posting and bill calcu'-ition • Good previous credit history. i i r t d Exhibit Agenda Item: 7J Utility Deposit (-Itiiity deposits are unnecessary in Colorado Springs A utility deposit is not necessary for write-offs low,Van Horn said. One is an The utility plugs the information Into a the vast majority of new residential and extensive network of government and computer program. CREDI.INE, that commercial customers, the Colorado nonprofit agencies to which customers basically determines the amount of Springs, Colo., Utilities has found. can be referred forassbtance.Also,CSU credit that an be extended to the cus- Through Innovative programs, the employees are empowered to make de- homer, she said. If the depositwould be municipal utility has almost been able cisions and strive to balance the inter- higher than the suggested aedit line, a to eliminate the administrative burden eats of customers and the utility, she deposit Is required, the said. associated with deposits, Colorado said. When short-term soludoni are not SptingsereditManagerSilviaVanHom sufficient, employees refera customer told attendees of APPA's EnergyMm to case management and a long-term, The municipal utility has almost been tomers Services and Communications oneonone relationship 6 established Workshop Oct 20 In Scottsdale, Ariz. for the duration of the unmet financial able to ellminate the administrative Colorado Springs has not required obligation, she aid. residential service deposits since the Colorado Springs Utilities extended early 1970s. except trader extenuating its deposit.waiver policy to commercial burden associated wlth deposits. dmumstances,VanHornsald.Theover- customers in October 1989. All new allsucceaoftheresidential program is commercial customers maysubmitcur- reflected In a steadily declining write- rent financial Information-a balance If the deposit is waived, the account is o6 to revenue of 0.44%. she said. sheet and Income statement-for m monitored for three years, Van Horn A number of programs help to keep view and verification, Van Horn said. said, lithe commercial customer misses a paymentduring that time, aletter and discontinuance notice 6 generated. A IF credit speciallstreviews the problem with the customer and either a deposit 6 required or payments are resumed and no deposit 6 charged, she saki. In 1994, 913 of 1,094 new commercial accounts had the deposit waived, Van ~J Horn aid. CSU 6 currently a.anitoring 4,115 active accounts for dr,;ely pay. went. Very, few of the new commercial ctutomen that have participated in the r p ogram since 1989 end up being writ- ten off, she said. Len than 0.45%ofthe ,F utr'h'ty'stotal commercial baddebt wsite- off is due to these customers. I t, ry t r s~ ;Y a t i gendaNo 7 'T ~gendalt ! q, 9~ ?ale 7, I Procedures for Determining Credit Rating, cont. Code 2 Total bill paid between penalty posting and bill calculation - bad previous credit history. 3 Some portion of bill unpaid at next bill calculation. q Some portion of previous bill unpaid five days after latest billing. Disconnect notice issued. 5 Cut order prepared. Some portion of previous balance unpaid on delinquent date of current bill. 6 Physical disconnect for non-pay. The returned check history is located in the upper right hand corner of the credit history screen directly beneath the credit history. Cgde 1 Represents one returned check within one billing cycle. 2 Represents two returned checks within one billing cycle. 333` NOTE: Ratings post monthly with the most recent month tithe left. A maximum of the twelve {12) most recent months show at any given i i I AFFOOAB9 I I f w. w{ .R r l n r ,r 4 i { t AUDIT REPORT ri THE LALOR FUND OF NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1993 l I LEROY HOWE b COMPANY, P.C. Certified Public Accountants Denton, Texas r N' 4 Y i RY.. i f :f THE LALOR FUND OF NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS pages t Independent Auditor's Report I 15 Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements 2 r Notes to Statement of r Cash Receipts and Disbursements 3-4 k j 'r { 4 t LEROY HOWE & COMPANY, P.C. 1'.EFmFien PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 419 S. CAAR L BLVD • P.O. Box 1605 . OENTopi. TEKAS 78202 6171387-6174 • FAx 617!387.5773 1 Independent Auditor's Report To the Hoard of Directors of ~y North Texas State Fair Association {6 We have audited the accompanying statement of cash receipts and disbursements of the Lalor Fund of North Texas State Fair Association (a non-profit organization) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1993. I+ This financial statement is the responsibility of the Association's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this t~ financial statement based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the statement of cash receipts and disbursements is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the statement of cash receipts and disbursements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the ~4 overall presentation of the statement of cash receipts and disbursements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. w As described in note 1, the statement of cash receipts and disbursements is a summary of the cash activity of the Association, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles. In our opinion, the statement of cash receipts and disbursement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the cash receipts J and disbursements of the Lalor Fund of North Texas State Fair Association for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1993. As discussed in note 21 the financial statement being presented is only 14 for the fund referred to above and does not include the assets, liabilities, and fund balances and the support, revenue, expenses, and capital additions of North Texas State Fair Association that are w recorded in its general fund. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statement is not intended to present the financial position of North Texas State Fair Association as of September 30, 1993, its results of operations or summary of cash activity for the fiscal year then ended in conformity with the basis of accounting described in note 1. f tS LEROY HOWE & COMPANY, P.C. July 19, 1994 i L YL . i LALOR FUND OF NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1993 Cash Receipts: City of Denton - Municipal Hotel Occupancy Tax S 63,254 i " Cash Disbursements: 4 Contract Services 20 000 Office Salary 12,993 Printing 6 913 r Advertising 6,001 Travel Telephone 21400 E Supplies 2,281 Postage 1,471 1,412 53,471 Increase in Cash 9,783 Beginning Cash - Bank One 18,194 3 Ending cash - Bank One LJLI 7 t-j The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement. a 2 ly .1 9 t r LALOR FUND OF NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION NOTES TO STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS September 30, 1993 k Note 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES o_raanization North Texas State Fair Association ("Association") is a non-profit charitable n~ eThe ducational, recreational, agricultural and operated youth purposes. The Lalor Fund of the North Texas State Fair Association (81Lalor Fund") is the fund that receives monies from the City of Denton and disburses the monies as required by a mutual written agreement. Basis of Accounting The accompanying financial statement has been prepared on the cash receipts and disbursements basis of accounting. Under that basis, ! the only asset recognized is cash, and no liabilities are recognized. All transactions are recognized as either cash receipts or disbursements, and noncash transactions are not recognized. The r^ cash basis differs from generally accepted accounting principles primarily because the effects of outstanding dues and obligations for assessments unpaid at the date of the financial statement are not included in the financial statement. t, Inc me Taxes The Association is a not-for-profit corporation as described in w. Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and is exempt from federal income taxes on related income pursuant to Section 501(a) r+ of the Code. Cash Account The cash of the Lalor Fund consists of a non-interest bearing account at Bank One in Denton, Texas. Note 2: FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY . The The Association has separate funds in its accounting system Lalor Fund is the only fund presented and audited in the accompanying Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements. st{' Accordingly, the accompanying Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements is not intended to present the summary of cash activity of the Association taken as a whole. { Ma } 3 i ( 9 C t . L F S LALOR FUND OF NORTH TEXAS STATE FAIR ASSOCIATION NOTES TO STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS September 30, 1993 s„ Note 3i AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON ("CITY") AND THE ' ASSOCIATION A 1990 agreement between the City and the Association provides for the payment and use of a municipal hotel occupancy tax. Varying amounts of monies are received by the Association every quarter { C from the City. The funds are to be used "for the purpose of s advertising and conducting solicitations and promotional programs to attract tourists and convention delegates or registrants to the ~ City of Denton or its vicinity." The agreement also specifies Ma specific types of expenses which may be incurred. p { k a 1 i i r F~ .mot S 1 M jai rb i 64 I: 4 I` f =CITY - EECOUNCI: - 1.._ ~I ♦ h~ C O . r O M t 1 4o0OeJ .I r ` r y 3 ,Ko qy- m+ BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS DO 1994-95 AIRPORT ADVISORY BO %D Dist CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION UM COUNCIL *7 John Dulemba John Dulemba 1992-94 Mayor *3 Nancy Hundley Don Smith 1992-94 Perry *4 James Jamieson James Jamieson 1992-94 Cott *5 Jim Risser Jim Risser 1992-94 Miller ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISOR". BOARD 1 DIET CURREtIT MEMBER NOMINATION COUNCIL *2 Mary McKay Joella Orr 1991-94 Smith BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Qj~t CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL { 3 *5 Rebecca King Rebecca King 1992-94 Miller p?P ? *2 Marcia Staff Larry Collister 1992-94 Smith i *3 VACANT (ALT) Bob Hagemann 1993-95 Perry ( *4 VACANT (ALT) Joe Bendzek 1993-95 Cott BUILDINO CODE BOARD DIET CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION COUNCIL i *3 James Fykes (ALT) James Fykes 1992-94 Perry *4 Bob George (ALT) Bryon Woods 1992-94 Cott k *5 Steve Kniatt Steve Kniatt 1992-94 Miller f *b Isabel Miller Mary McCain 1992-94 Brock j *7 Greg Muirhead Greg Muirhead 1992-94 Mayor * - Individual nominated and approved No * - Individual nominated but not approved - no nomination q P f ` OgendaNo 9y'd Z Agendalt - Orate ' ~ ~ r COKKU TY DBVBMXZNT ADVISORY COMMITTEE DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL *5 Dorothy Martinez Dorothy Martinez 1992-94 Miller *6 Peggy Fox Peggy Fox 1992-94 Brock 7 Fred Hill Jean Ellen Rogers 1992-94 Mayor *3 Curtis Ramsey Larry Bailey 1992-94 Perry *5 Rey Trejo Ann Hatch 1992-94 Miller DATA PROCEssING ADVISORY BOARD S t x DIST C=ENT MEMBER NOMINATION It Lul COUNCIL *2 Rosa Lawton Rosa Lawton 1992-94 Smith 3 Robert W. Minnie 1392-94 Perry 4 Brian Scott Renae Seely 1992-94 Cott `i DORNTM ADVISORY BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T= X33+ *3 Geneva Berg Geneva Berg 1992-94 Perry *4 BeBe Olufsen Anita Creach 1992-94 Cott *5 Fred Patterson Joy Williams 1992-94 Miller *6 Barbara Philips Michael Flanagan 1992-94 Brock *7 Rahna Raney Rahna Raney 1992-94 Mayor itz mxCAL CODE BOARD DIST c URRENT MEMBER NOMINATION ,T~~1 COUNCIL *3 John Hardinger John Hardinger 1992-94 Perry *4 David Martin Don Fox 1992-94 Cott *1 Robert Hicks Robert Hicks 1992-94 Chew i * - Individual nominated and approved ; No * - Individual nominated but not approved - no nomination i '•i. r `jt f f VendaNo 9y' g 4gendalie Dale ~J'/ pp-q~1 HISTORIC LMMARK COMMISSION J GIST CUMENT MEMBIi$ NOMINATION TM COUNCIL *3 Kenneth Morgan Kenneth Morgan 1992-94 Perry *7 Judy Cole Judy Cole 1992-94 Mayor *2 Mary McCain Jim Kirkpatrick 1992-94 Smith XUXhX SERVICES COMMITTEE Dhi`I` CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TFBk3 COUNCIL *6 Jim Bend2ek Pat Muro 1992-94 Brock i 7 Lawrence Cochran Diana Briggs 1992-94 Mayor *2 Terry Garrett Kent Miller 1992-94 Smith I *4 Sandy Kristofersen sandy Kristoferaen 1992-94 Cott SEEP DEMON BEAUTIFUTi BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T= AIL *1 Dave Boston Charlye Heggins 1992-94 Chew } *6 Gertrude Gibson Luanne Hicks 1992-94 Brock 0 *7 Betty Kimble Vera Laney 1992-94 Mayor *3 Kandice Gandel Kandice Gandel 1992-94 Perry *4 Bill Watson Bill Watson 1992-94 Cott LIBRARY BOARD DIST CCMRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TTBM COUNCIL *7 Kjell Johansen Kjell Johansen 1992-94 Mayor *3 Kathy Pole Kathy Pole 1992-94 Perry *4 Jean Schaake Ena Ruth Russell 1992-94 Cott ' * - individual nominated and approved No * - Individual nominated but not approved 3 - no nomination I MEOW ( S y. ~gendaNo tw alleq We 7 y~S ?apORSATION BaAltO DIST ~UuRENT MEMBER NOMINATION- ~Q~jiCIL Tom Judd 1992-94 Mayor *7 Tom Judd *2 Loyce Wilson LoYce Wilson 1992-94 Smith +vn anvrvn~ GOMMI88ION i NOMINATION T= *3 Mike Cochran Mike Cochran 1992-94 Perry *5 Jim Engelbrecht Ellen Schertz 1992-94 Miller *6 Katie Flemming Katie Flemming 1992-94 Brock p~mm~~Ixa A*[9 MLCRAxIGI~T~>k` , 40xRA DIST CURRE M Ci4 ~ TES ~3i~~3I' *5 Millard Heath Millard Heath 1992-94 Miller Lee Capps 1992-94 Brock *6 Lee Capps Jeff Peploe 1992-94 Chew *1 Jeff Peplos YOBLIG tiTILIT__Il:'~1'~? DIST rrmR NT MEMBER DOMINATION TERM couNCIL i ~ George Hopkins 1990-94 Brock Roland Lacey 810.11 nnsU Z AUjM CL~RF~,~N.T M - BEM_-~R NOMINATION TM ~L pIST *1 Harry Eaddy Spencer Washington 3992-94 Chew *3 Ann Houston (ALT) Ann Houston 1992-94 Perry *7 Mike Wiebe Mike Wiebe 1992-94 Mayor * - Individual nominated and approved No * - Individual nominated but not approved - no nomination ; j. , a ~ y I ' rt A ~ A gendaNo ~gendalte - 7F,R - ~,P yo~S n~nx9 7Ltt9 RFCRB_ATION 80ARD RENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL DIST C« Tom Judd 1992-94 Mayor *7 Tom Judd Loyce Wilson 1992-94 Smith *2 Loyce Wilson ~;,~k~INO 80NIN0 COMMIBBION RFNT MEMBER NOMINATION T COUNCIL DIST *3 Mike Cochran Mike Cochran 1992-94 Perry *5 Jim Engelbrecht Ellen Schertz 1992-94 Miller Katie Flemming 1992-94 Brock *6 Katie Flemming L.w venp1N70Ara CODB BOARD VLVX DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T COUNCIL Millard Heath 1992-94 Miller *5 Millard Heath Lee Capps 1992-94 Brock *6 Lee Capps Jeff Peploe 1992-94 Chew *1 Jeff Peploe z PUBLIC uTIUITI68 BOARD D~3'. c~mRENT MEMBER NOMINATION COUNCIL i George Hopkins 1990-94 Brock *6 Roland Laney 9IOIi BOJ~RD OF APF~Q~OUNCIL DIS n~fRRFNT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM *1 Harry Eaddy Spencer Washington 1992-94 Chew k 1992 *3 Ann Houston (ALT) Ann Houston -94 Perry C *y Mike Wiebe Mike Wiebe 1992-94 Mayor * - Individual nominated and approved No * - Individual nominated but not approved i - no nomination f yr• p, r ~gendaNo 9~"023 4gendalte TRUFIC SAMY COMMIBBION S -S DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T~BM COUNCIL *6 VACANT L. Keith Martin 1992-94 Brock t *1 Kathy Devine Kathy Devine 1992-94 Chew *2 Eric Jackson Eric Jackson 1992-94 Smith *3 George Kay Mark Ooones 1992-94 Perry *4 Edna Redmon Larry Luce 1992-94 Cott CIVIL SERVICE COMMIBBION ' w CURRENT MEMBER NQMINATI41i TFFSM *3 Charldean Newell Charidean Newell 1991-94 Harrell a DBNTON ROUGING AUTHORITY i T CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM 1 Derrell Bulls 1992-94 Mayor 2 Rudy Rodriguez 1992-94 Mayor S 7 TKPA BOARD OF DIRECTORS CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TEBM *1 Tom Harpool Tom Harpool 1992-94 council ACC00128 * - Individual nominated and approved No * - Individual nominated but not approved - no nomination f s Y 4 i I D CITY Of PENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 DATE: July 181 1994 ` TO: Mayor and Members of the City council FROM: Linda Holleyr Executive Secretary SUBJECT, Maps for City Council Packets for July 190 1994 The attached maps were inadvertently left out of your packets I hope this did not cause you any type of inconvenience. Friday. Linda Holley b 3 y' lah ~ t l Y l i t ,f 8171568.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 EE ND OF FILE