HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-22-1994
. wova:r
~ r
1
'i .
1
.
it CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
' G
;z LI 11/22/94
r `
x
I
~i
1
3 ' k f r l
k
r 1
i
. , ;Hyy'a,'ytdiptJ'.iWMrsJdYd'+S':FIk'+X~.v'IS:i:~.
9' f
CITY OF DENAGENDA
TON CITY COUNCIL 1 O~
November 22, 1994
Closed Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
November 22, 1994 at 5:15 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of City
Hall, 215 E, aaKinney, Denton, Texas, at which the following items E
will be conssaeredr
NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO
CEASED MEETING AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS
LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE,
5:15 p.m.
10 Closed Meetings
A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071
. d
1. Consider action in Moore V. Je. et al.
k 2. Consider action in Teresa 11 1 v G{~y of Denton
{t Denton Police Department and AY* Kutche:
1
S B. Real Estate Under TER. GOVT CODE Sea. 551.072
y }
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE
Sea. 551,074
Special Called Session of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, at,6:O0 p.m. in the city Council Chambers of City Hall,
215 B. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be
considered:
6:00 P.M.
16 Pledge of Allegiance
2. Consider approval of a resolution of appreciation for the
Eurskal Playground volunteers.
30 Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction E
regarding various matters relating to TMPA. !~I
4. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction r
regarding the new emissions testing program.
5. Hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding rules for
placing emergency council items on an agenda.
6. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction
regarding a comparison of 1992 Subdivision and Platting
r regulations and the current regulations.
AQMOINi.-~~
---~~-`x~
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 22, 1994 O~
Page 2
{
7. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction
regarding a request from the Fire Fighter's Association to
increase employee contributions to the Fire Fighter Pension
Fund.
33
Be Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval
tt.ereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations.
Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his
designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations. The City Council has received background
information and has had [,n opportunity to raise questions regarding
these items prior to consideration.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
Detailed back-
payment under the ordinance section of the agenda.
lap information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 9.A,
9, B), This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow
Counoil Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of
the consent, Agenda. Upon the receipt of a "request to speak" form
from a citizen regarding an item on the Consent Agenda, the item
shall be removed and be conctdered before approval of the Consent
Agenda.
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
11 Bid 11677 - Land Compactor
d System
2. Bid 11682 - h Testing
Sid /1683 - 69KV Circuit Breakers
4. P.O. 151153 - Southwest Fluid Products
9. Ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive
bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services. (2.A.1 - Bid 116770
'I
2.A.2. - Sid 11682, 2.A.3. - Sid 11683)
S. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the f
expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or
equipment which are available from one source in
accordance with the provisions of state law exempting
such purchases from requirements of competitive bids.
(2.A.4. - P.O. {51153)
i
j
,OWN
1Sol
i
Ii
,
~ City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 22, 1994
r,.
Page 3 DAs- I -a4
_3 d FLJ
10. Resolutions {
A. Consider approval of a resolution giving General
Telephone of the Southwest, thirty days notica to produce
records previously requested of GTE by the City Ma.tager
in his letter of February 10, 1994 relating to an audit
of GTE's franchise fee payments to the city.
11. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager.
12. Official ?+otion on Closed Meeting Itemsi
A. Legal Matters
S. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
13. Now Business
This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest
it®as for future agendas.
14. Closed Meetings
A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOV'T C06E Soo. 551.071
? B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Soo. 551.072
C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE
Sec. 551.074
{
I C E R T I F I C A T E j
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on l
the day of
6 , 1994 at o~clock (a.m.) i
CITY SECRETARY
r
t
f
1 P Y
14
ll inx «y
low
g
I f
'4w*Na
Agendalf
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 22, 1994
Page 4 C) { r
NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE
CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE
HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY
SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO
THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH
` THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE.
ACCO022A
,I I
f,
L
i
I:
yid
i a
i'
I'
y
1
r
-CQUN I
ti _r
(
yip .rl
i
1} C
1 '
~a r
o s
d
Z
F
■
1
AWWO
Apenda ~
fn~prtttattonof
mrn P ium or souTz Lum PARES
WHEREAS, duribe eng the past ton months, OThe Friends of South
Lakes Parks have n the nucleus for one of the biggest volunteer
projects in the history of our cosmunityl and
WHEREAS, "The Friends of South La1as Park* have contributed to
the enormous sense of pride end ownership found in our oorrnnityJ
and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has been fortunate in', hiving
"Friends of South Lakes Park■ volunteer their ti" 04 ifforts in
making the imagination of the obildrM of Denton=m~ olye rea~itrJ
Ind r
WHIMAS, as a result of their efforts, the childrsa`.p= Aint$h
have one of the most spectacular and Innovative p18'ygim6ds in the':.
oountryl and
F
lNraWHM~, from the arettivity and !energy of th♦ + voy - .
, pltnaers, and ooordinatorq evolvA a uniquo *Lt Ori
playground which will allow for ehdlees y1&y ahd edJ tiontl.,
oppoitunitiea'tor generations of young people to come) ate
WHEREAS, during the weak of November 1, 1904, *Slw.Ft'1 e
88owupth Lakes Pcrk,M along with tbousanda of volunteersi".b t IM
oo
L"ths mpett*4 the construction of thee 15,000 aQ•.are foot' Robert
n Playground known as HEureka J WOW, THEREfOP,
j TU OODNCIL OF TRA CITY OF Dn"M HEREBY RESOLVESt {
f
That the sincere warm appreciation of aTh rriMds of South
Lakes Park• and the thousands of volunteers who unssiflabl ow Of
their time :nd money to construct this math manipulative'pT Mgro
for the children of Denton, be formall oonv ' Y*d to }hAl in 4
permanent manner by recording this rssoiutien f4ibh, ttAS'dffI0141
i
minutes of the City County of the city of DantOn';' s', ep~
tlorw rding to then a true copy thereof as a tok~h o! our i01(- j
PASSED AHD APPROVED this the day of r 1 04.
DOD
7 ~ ~ ~ ATTESI't
JXW rFER WAiTIM, CITY BSCRETARY
k. BYt
~ J v
APPROVZD AS TO i ~S~FI f J x, I
LW
MICHAEL A. BVCEE,ACTNG CITY ATTORNEY
BYE
1
f
Air
I
. =CITY~ ~
COUNCI
W~
rtittdtttib
r
~r
s
P ~
~ a
!r j
1 Y
d
44
v
a 1
I
I
C
i
I
aB9
%peadal 17
November 22, I!M
CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA
WORK SESSION i
Tq: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
e
FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
SUBJECT: TWA POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
TWA Is revlewing several major Issues regarding the power costa at their Gibbons 1
Creek plant. Tom Harpool and Hill Giese, Denton's two members on the TMPA Board,
will be At the council meeting to discuss TMPA's study.
Bob Nelson, (Executive Director of Utilities, has Included a memo regarding the study
r and will prevent the technical findings of the study,
J
Snbmltt
' LI d V. HsnreIL City Manager
r
L
I
1
to
~IVt as c..;
~ ( r
Date
MT2V, TlXAg MUNICIPAL 8U!
/ LD1Nu 2 15 E CIrrof~ McKlNNEY
/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201
P
ail w'
MEMORANDUM 1
i
To' LLOYD V.
NARRELL, CITY MANAGER
FROM: R.E. NeIJOn, Executive Director of Utilities
DATE:
November 17, 1994
RE: TWA
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSES
In May 1994, TMPA hired the consulting a
Power 5aonly Anon frm of Burns &
r M
The "Interim" report of that stud cDonald to perform a
Material.
y is Included In the council
The major issues under analysis are.
1• Continued use of Gibbons Creek lignite fuel va. im } a
;La Powder River Basin of W Porting coal from the
plant. Wyoming to fuel the Gibbons Creek electric power
r
r 1'r 2, Continued use of Gibbons Creek electrical plant vs. tempora
t4s antsod l purchasing power or Install the latest technrdo temporarily laying it
gas powered electrical generation plant. high-efficiency I
3,
The timing ~
r.
and optimum choice of the nest
generation for options 1 and 2 above. Phase of electrical power
'T The TMPA lignite fuel at the Gibbons Creek Power Plant ju quality lignite that is less efficient and causes more maintenance onet eo y last is a
available from WY om~ Poor
;~j 1970'-, Wyoming coal was en the Gibbons Creek plant was beia P than coal
ki high and escalatin le'pensive And the railroad trans g Planned in the mid the four cities of Ports"O
Greenville who created TMPA In 1975 to provideD heir Garland o costs were
T Bryan, Garland and ,
Federal and State Government to the early ovide heir ordered electritAl
cease using natural as as Power needs after the
8 a fuel, choose the only (ignite tb be b cities to phase down and f
they could find available at
that time which was the Grimes County lignite. Since thew, severs! Chan
occurred which has chang
regarding
y ed the economics changes 1•ave
Me of Grimes County lignite,
6 f 7/b66 8200 D" METRO 4,94.2528
li
rrmc.y
,..Y06
RETAKE TARGET
Because of suspected operator
error or camera malfunction, the .
receedin
p g page was refilmed and
` appears as the next image.
r .M
i
eHo ~Y-
Apendalterri..~ 3
Of L~
CITY of DENTOW, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 7F201
MEMORANDUM
j
TO; LLOYD V. HARTcELL, CITY MANAGER
FROM: R.E. Nelson, Isccutlve Director of Utilities '
' DATE: November 17, 1994
aRE; TMPA POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
In may 1994, TMPA hired the consulting firm of Burns & McDonald to perform a r"
Power Supply Analvxla. The "Interim" report of that study Is included in the council
material
The major Issues under analysis are:
1. Continued use of Gibbons Creek lignite fuel vs. Importing coal from the
' Powder River Basin of Wyoming to fuel the Gibbons Creek electric power
plant.
2. Continued use of Gibbons Creek electrical plant vs. temporarily laying it
up and purchasing power or install the latest technology high-efficiency
natural gas powered electrical generation plant.
3. The timing and optimum choice of the nest phase of electrical power
generation for options I mad 2 above,
The TMPA lignite fuel at the Gibbons Creek Power Plant In Grimes County is a poor
quality lignite that is less efficient and causes more maintenance on the plant than coal
available from Wyoming. When the Gibbons Creek plant was being planned in the mid
1970'x, Wyoming coal was fairly espensliv and the ra':iroad transportation costs were
! high and escalating. Therefore, the tour cities of Denton, Bryan, Garland and
Greenville who created TMPA in 19,15 to provide their electrical power needs after the
Federal and State Government in the early 1970's ordered toe cities to phase down and^
! cease using octurel gas as a fuel, choose the only lignite that they could find available at
that time which was the Grimes County lignite. Since then, aevcral changes have
occurred which has changed the economics regarding use of Grimes County lignite
8 1 71588 8200 DIFW METh'0 434.2529
own
pgen4aNo ~_-_.~y
Page 2 ApenOalteat~-~tletennL''
First, the price of electricity increased substantially In the 1970's and early 1980's
making energy conservation cost effective, which caused electric usage to not increase as
fast as previously expected. This lessened the demand on the coal mines of Wyoming
which has z,ow resulted In a surplus of mining capacity. The railroads revenues
increased sufficiently during the 1980's so that they were able to rebuild and modernize
i their tracks and equipment and the result ha been that railroad transportation rates
have stabilized. These factors have made Wyoming coal very competitive with the
poorer quality Texas lignite when factoring In the lower operation and maintenance
costs resulting with Wyoming coal. Also, Wyoming copl has very little sulphur and it is
believed that pollution would be reduced. These are all factors relating to the first issue
being studied.
` The changes that have taken place that relate to the second Issue listed above is the
deregulation of the natural gas industry, the quantum technological advances In
combwtion turbines (jet engines) and their combination with conventional steam turbine
generators plus the beginnings of deregulation of the electrical power Industry, The
federal government deregulated the natural gas industry In stages in the late 19701s and
> early 1980's which unleashed major gas exploration and resulted in unprecedented
increases In the efficiencies of transportation and marketing of natural gas, Also,
. i advanced computer and gas will drilling technology has decreased the risk and cost Of
exploring and producing natural gas. In the early 1980'x, Denton was paying over S•1.50
for 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas. Today Denton is paying In the range of SI.SO to
$1.73 per 1,000 cubic feet. The reduced cost of natural gas coupled with the advances In
generation plant efficiencies from 32% to 55% has resulted in the fuel cost portion of
generating electricity to fall from 4.50 per KWH In the 1980's to 1.20 per KWH today.
The final factor has been the beginnings of deregulation of the electric utility industry
>
with the Energy Act of November 1992 which
essentially declared that electrical !
transmission lines be "common carriers", Le. any qualified power producer can use the E
transmission line of another company to transport alectricity from their power plant to a
remote electrical customer. The result has been a proliferation of independent power
producers (IPP's) that have ecquired large reserves of low cost natural gas and build
r extremely effieleni power plants and then market the power to customers throughout the
region. These factors have resulted in wholesale power costs to drop to the 3.00 per
KWH range. This price is very close to the fuel, operation and maintenance cost of
f ; ! TMPA's Gibbons Creek power plant. Therefere, TMPA Is analyzing whether it is
rt'„ possible to buy wholesale power or even install a very efficient plant themselves that
might be cheaper than continuing to operate and maintain the Gibbons Cn.vk plant.
, ~Yh} t r$~~ ~riJa
Tyr 5ap4+
T r~ F ~T l
i a
t"•. i 1 I j
' y: ♦ r I
%
~ cYY
~w
r
II
gOtmdsl~o v~Y
A9eRdait b
Page 3
The factors relating to the third issue are the four TMPA cities need for additional
generating capacity in approximately five years. This Issue Is complicated by the
uncertainty of whether the City of College Station will continue to be a wholesale f,
customer of the four TMPA cities titer College Station's contract expires at the end of `
1995. The full analysis of this issue is not yet complete and will depend on the decisions
regarding issues 1 and 2. i
low 1 rraat}b•
The power supply analysis regarding switching to the Wyoming coal indicated that the
cost of Gibbons Creek power for 1996 could be reduced from the present 5.3E1KWH to
4.60/KWH or a reduction of approximately 151/s. or approximately $12 million per year.
The net present value (NPV) of the annual costs for the next 17 years using Wyoming ►
coal is $3.58 billion as compared with the present operations NPV of $3.81 billion.
fame 2 reaadta:
The power supply analysis regarding Ite wholesale purchase of power and temporarily
"laying up" the Gibbons Creek plant indicated that the 19% costs would go from
5.30/KWH to over 8.OOKWH. However, the consultants did not use the lowest cost
wholesale supplies that perhaps could be found in the market, therefore, this analysis
needs further work.
The power supply analysis regarding Instilling a new high efficient combustion turbine
and combining that with an existing Garland or Bryan steam turbine power plant and
temporarily "laying up" the Gibbons Creak plant Indicated the 1996 costs would go
from 5.30/KWH to 5.20/KWH. The net present value of the "replacetlayup" option was
„ S3.7 billion as compared with the present operstion of $3.8 billion.
In both of the "la ap" cases , the consulted continued to Include the $7 million per
year dragline and .ronveyor belt lease even though that equipment would no longer be
needed. Also, no value was given to the 20,000+ acres of land or the value of the
existing plant. In all cases, the debt services on the $1.4 billion TMPA debt would
continue to be paid until payment was complete in 2019. The estimated cost to switch to
Wyoming coal is S33 million and it would take 18 months to build the necessary
railroad, unloading fscilitles and boiler impaovemeots.
The TMPA Bog Is/(ontimiAng to study the options and plan to meet again in Januery.
S9~
ICE. Nelson, Executive Director
Department of Utilitlet
i
3 ~=CITY
E
f ---C O VN. I
z -w
V ~rw.-rr~r
rY~.~r.~FN
4s
t ^i
I4
yr ~ K h1,)
J{rF~ 1 u - r i
r )
.r , r e r .r
7
i
1
~kNr
_OE5
(;(T Y O(DITNTONi TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ~ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ~ TELEPHONE (817) 568-8307
Office of the Ofy MwWer j'
MEMORANDUM t
! Tos Mayor and Members of the City Council
FR01h Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
DATZa November 17, 1994
j SUWZCTs Review of Council Rules Concerning ?lacement of Items on
j a City Council Agenda
At the City Council meeting of November S, 1994, I reviewed in
detail with the Council the procedures followed in establishing the
Council Agenda. Following that discussion, a Council Member asked
that the specific rule of the Council governing the placement of
I emergency items on the agenda be reviewed. This memorandum.
Ar attempts to carry out that request.
Er:'ntially, when discussing this subject, three important time
;frt .Z periods need to be mentioned as follows:
1. According to Council Rule 6.3 (attached), any member of
Ij the Council may suggest an item for future discussion at
# a Work Session. Thus, any member of the Council has the !
right to place any item on the agenda. However, the
exact timing is left to the discretion of the staff and
Agenda Committee. If a Council Member requests a
specific date for that discussion, every attempt is made
sr F` L
to honor that request. .
w 2. The city Agenda Committee finalizes the agenda some time
! during the week before a Council Meeting, usually at an
Agenda Meeting held at 9s00 a.m. on. the Thursday '
r+ preceding the Tuesday Council Meeting. Following the
adjournment of the Agenda Committee where the items to be
considered have been agreed upon, section 6.1 (attached)
of the Council Rules of Procedure comes into play. This
rule specifies that if a Council MembEr has an emergency
item that the individual feels should be placed on the
next regular or special meeting agenda, the placement
must be approved by two nembers of the Agenda Committee.
"Dedicated to Quality Senice"
1
4
1
r
"
Now
Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 171 1994
_1L:.Aa.:. ;
Page 2
3. Accordi. d to state law, the City Cou11ci1 Must post the r.:
formal Council Agenda by Friday at 5:00 p.xr. in order to
;
meet the 12 hour rule required. Thus, it any item is
added to the agenda following that time, State law ~
provisions governing emergencies must come into play.
V, ' Acting City Attorney Mike Bucek will be prepared to
t discuss what would qualify as an emergency' under State
law and thus eligible for consideration after the 72 hour
F•eriod had passed.
f,
If there are any further questions regarding these procedures, j '
please f el free to contact me.
i
i f
r:
q Harre
City.~Manager i
LVH: bw
AMM0OsD9
J N;
Attachments
q is i
4~f r f
~pM'l~1 I, y 4 1 1 A r
is
OM4
wS, r , : sr
,
nr
i
j
genaaNu
mendaitem -
approximately one hour at appropriate points in the mening7 agenda,
or if requested by any two members.
6. 21 Oft Sigmas
6.1 agenda: The orler of business of each meeting shall be k
as contained in the agenda prepared by the City Manager. The
agenda shall be a listing by topic of subjects to be considered by
the Council. Placement of items on the agenda shall be governed by
this section and Section 6.3; provided that if a Councilmember has
an "emergency" item that the Councilmember believes should be
placed on the next regular or special meeting agenda, the placement
must be approved by two members of the Agenda Committee. Conduct
of business at special meetings and Council Committees and subcom-
mittees will likewise be governed by an agenda and rules of pro-
cedure contained herein.
6.2 p} idge of allegiances Each agenda shall provide an item
for the recital of the "Pledge of Allegiance" at the regularly
scheduled oity council meetings.
6.3 presensetionsby Members of Council: The agenda shall
provide a titre when the Mayor or any Councilmember may bring before
/ the Council any business that he or she feels should be deliberated {
upon by the Council. These matters need not be specifically listed
on the agenda, but discussion and formal action on such matters
shall be deferred until a subseqquuent Council meeting. Any member
may au,gest an item for discussion at a future work session. The
City Manager or city staff shall only respond preliminartly on this
item at the work session. rf the City Council believes the item
requires a more detailed review, the Council Yil.l give the City
Manager or City Staff direction to place the item on a future regu
lar meeting agenda and advise staff as to the background materials
to be desired at such meeting.
6.4 Presentation by citizens:
(a) Any person who wishes to place a subject on the Council
agenda at regular City Counoil meetings shall advise the City
Manager's office of that fact and the specified,cubject matter
which he or she desires to place on the agenda no later than 5:00
p.m. Wednesday prior to the Council meeting ut which he or she
wishes the designated subject to be considered.
(b) Any person who wishes to address the Council regarding an
item that is on the Counoill'a agenda for a regular or special
meeting, shall complete a "request to speak" form asking to speak
regarding the item and return it to the City Secretary before the
l Council considers the item. The Mayor will call upon the citizen
to speak for no longer than three (3) minutes its that particular
PAGE 7
1
=C ITY=
-COUNCI-
~....-tip.
1
c
r i
i
`V
i
i , P
I
wrr mnl
dwISO
coil
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
i
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers f
a
✓ FROKt Nike Bucek, Acting City Attorney
SUBJECT: Hawk Valley Subdivision Request for Resolution Autnoriz-
ing water Service from Argyle Water supply corporation
DATEt November 18, 1994
i
r At the City Council meeting on November 15, 1994, J.R. Browning, a
representative for the above referenced subdivision, inferred that
simce the state platting statute was amended after the Hawk Valley -
I Addition was subdivided that granting a variance to City's platting
' ' requirements to Hawk Valley would not result in the creation of a j
`d precedent detrimental to the City in future cases. Attached is a
copy of the bill that was apprrved by the Texas legislature which
amended Section 212.004(a) a the Local Government Code as we
discussed on November 15. ~e ke ch nee in Y,fie statute can be
i found ..:go 1 of C.S.H. Sill NO. 496. The term "and" is
a replaced with the term "or". Prior to the effective date of Bill
496, a platting requirement under Section 212.004(x) was not
triggered unless the division of a tract of land also involved =2
laying out of streets alleys squares *+r*ks or other narta (e.a..
utility easements=.
3 a, State law does not provide a "variance procedure" to allow a
developer not to plat . The "variance procedure" the City Council regularly considers is the varying of subdivision rules and
for a storm
regulations (e.g. j the city waives the requirement j
system and allows surface water to be funneled through an earthen
channel on large rural tracts) not the varying of the requirement ;
to plat. Neither the old statute wording nor the new statute
wording helps Hawk Valley. Under the old statute, if i'awk Valley
~u needed a water line easement to supply water to its subdivision, it
needed to plat. Under the new statute, there is one exception to
the platting requirement if the division of the tract door not
create any parcels leas than five acres. Since Hawk Valleyts
I Subdivision resulted in tracts being between 3 to a acres in size,
it would be required to plat today even if it did not need a water
,i :.o line easement. Clearly, the new statute is more restrictive than
the old statute, but Hawk Valley can not comply with either.
s
'&dkofed to Quo6ry S"kr'
Owl
i
- 140 , The Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers C7 d-FU
November 181 1994
Page 2
if the City were of the opinion that Section 212.004(x) could be
varied, and Hawk Valley received a variance from platting, then any 4
other addition which was subdivided and did not plat prior to the
effective date of the new statute, could request it be allowed to
install water lines without plattinQ'as well. More seriously, if
Hawk Valley is required to plat under both statutes in order to
install water lines, it woule appear plausible that a developer
under the new statute could request a variance to platting to
install water lines using Hawk Vall y's argument that Argyle water
is better than individual water wells.
Equally important is the fact that it the City grants a variance to
Hawk Valley being required to plat, then in the future the City
will be reviewing plats from 20 larxfowners rather than from one, as
presently required. Section 34-34 of Ordinance No. 94-150, adopted
by the City on August 16, 1914, amended the City's Subdivision
Rules and Regulations by implementing Section 4 of Bill 496 (lines
24 and 25. p.act?). This section requires any person, who proposes
the development of a track of land within the city or its extrater
ritorial jurisdiction, t,.p file a development plat with the City and
have the City approve same bAfore new development may begin on the
:;'r; .{c y•i property. A copy of the applicable sections of the Local Govern- I `
y sent Code regulating development plats is attached.
Hopefully this memorandum answers the questions the City Council
had in this eatt3r. Please give me a call should you have any i`
questions.
l q.
r f~
C
Mike eucjk 1
J M" t tr
t Attacbment
pc: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager (memo only)
i' Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning
and Community Development
, l~\npdos~lcorMwtv7.~a
t
1
r
Mote 111 tell CITY-20011 OWN
genwo.+~.~....-
Qdlt -
Mete
t
j t fly Oliveira ■.l. 116
Substitute the followoAq for N.D. 048
By C.S.N.I. NS
i
A TILL TO at x"ITlil
1 AN ACT
i 1 relating to platting requirements.
f
1 as 11 XUMS / fr Tat I.1101MATM Of TNt STATN O! mul
a SMION 1. Section 111.004(a), 1opa1 Oovernsent Coder is a4
l amended to read as follows }I
d (a) The owner of a tract of land located vithln the
` 7 limits or to the extratsrritorlal jurisdiction of a {
* S sunlolpelity 1;M divides the tract in the or Wro parts to Jay I
I out a subdivieton of the traetn Including an addition to a If
1e sunielpality, or to lay cut suburban, bull", or other lots,
11 &C (wW) to lay out strosts, alleys. squares, parks, or otha9
at parts of the treat Intended to be dedicated to publlo nee or
11 for the Via at _ ~ pnecawre or owners of lots lrontlniq on or
14 adjacent to the attostst okays, sgu "ej parks, or other
A
} is parts a"% Was a plot of the rAbdlvislen prepared. A
id divislo0 of a treat 11111209 this subsection includes a dirioion
17 regatdleu et vbethe9.1! is made by usirq s mobs and bontAls
j Is description in a deed of eonveyaraa or in a contract 11n a
' to 40ed, by using a contract at sale or other . neutory contract
tys.,, 1o to convey, or by Vein any other snood. I division abpd
11 ~>r t1.ie enbeeet an de~~ net include a alvlafen at Iand
ay 11 ~1Sd Itt is Ot ik kA tY_Slai~ tejtrYl~cr~a~.~~a~~~~aa QQW.A d
w
1x,1 „ If DA M&116
c
1 w
.
y
error
ondaNo,
dendaltem
at►
t
1 SRCTIOM a. Section 111.003, LOCAL Government CodA; is
2 ""ad to road as fo%lovel
i 1 Sae. 212.005. APPROVAL by NWIC2PALITI RS4VIRt0. The
1 1,N,nicipal authority responsible for approving plats asst
5 approve a plat 9r rj" that in required to be. prepared under
1
i S this subahapter and that satistios all applicable. regulations.
7 SlCTIOp 2. Saotlon 212.01!(0), LOCAL Goveru.ent Code, is
1 atanded to road as follower
S (a) It the proposed roplat Iypylre a variantw and is l
10 protested in accordance with this subsection, t1l1 prop0ae6
j; 22 replat suet receive, in order to be approved, the attiraativo
12 vote of at leoat threa-fourths of the h}tj mombers U u" of
}
12 the municipal planning aooiesion or governirn b"Y, or both.
L/ for a Legal protest, vrltten inelrucents signed by the ovrAri
of at least 20 percent of the area at the iota or land
is imWataly adjoining the area covered by the proposed sapla! i
t 1
27 and extending 200 fast from that area, but vithln the ariginal E
15 subdivision, must be tiled vlth the w nioipal plannln4
iP Cosmiaaion or governing body, err both, prior to th6 ale" of
20 the public hearing,
j 21 SM1010 a. seotiau 212.001, LOCAL Goverrnunt Code, i.
E 22 amarded to read u tolIavor
}
22 See. 212.511. )lVitICIthsam OOVIORO by SGLlCRAVISR. This
f 11 subchapter applies only to (u-oasoaed) S muniolpolity (v1tk-s
1 15 population -e4-extw-shoal-h~-dsa) whose governing body
24 Chooses by ordinance to be Covered by thin subchapter or dose
Iwo
1
`171 771 111{ i171•FVI ~Y Fu~\
11,11111 71:11 4
l~peadalt 'v
S6R !
to be tovecad by the 1161t codified sy this
f by ordinance MM
I aubchepter. legislation WA the
houses create an
el~t i. The i*pocttu+ee ct this s orovdad cenditlon Of the ea:endars in both
d tae i
r lio necessity that
eserQeney and an 1eDeratiw 77~
le talluiclnq bills to b• read an three
6 constitutional ru
each house auspandad, and this tole is
€ I sevam days in
'a. d hereby suspended.
y r
17 ~ I 'a
I
ae
+t
1
2-
1
tt
f '
i
,
_a
..rt"
p
.
l
ge►IdaNo
~tji)0(J81
1XVD USE & RELATED ACTIV TJ~ll 0212.046
aster SUBCHAPTER B. REGULATION OF in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the municipality
'stall- PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT to promote the health, safety, morals, or genera1 the welfare of the municipality and the safe, orderYy, and
+v'ater '
healtl•.tul development of the municipality.
ci at Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, 1 1, eR. Sept L 1987. f
union 1 212.01& Development Plal Required
a that
anknt (a) Any person who proposes the development of a
E 1.0105 tract of land located within the limits or in the extra-
10 nor territorial jurisdiction of the municipality must have a
a feea. development plat of the tract prepared in accordance
3Ytree with this subchapter and the applicable plans, rules, or
ordinances of the municipality.
rtes a
105 or (b) A developmeat plat must be
prepared by a
registered professional land surveyor as a boundary
M that g
-umint
2.0105. 1112.011. Municipality (t) each existing or proposed building, structure,
Covered by Subchapter or improvement or proposed modification of the
mis&_
rerf of section a amended by Ads J external configuration the balding, structure, or
l 199A 11nd Les, u! 101% 1 1 improvement involving a change of the build rig,
structure, or lm emenG
''rdiof a- This subchapter applies only to a municipality l l
rhose j7Ye s (2) each easement and right-of-way within or
whowd b antes u body chooses by ordinance to be abutting the boundary of the surve properY Aapter or chase by ordinance to and
Y~
r1ePt 1, be covered by the liw codified by this sub hapter.
f' Act 1189, 70th Leg, ch. 119,1 1, eaL Sept 1.1987. Amend (1) the dimensions of each street sidewalk, alley,
ad by Acts 1990, 72rd Leg, ch. 1916, 14. etf. Aug. 90, 1990. square, park, or other part cf the property Intended
of the For te-d q sediort a amended by Ads to be dedicated to public use or for the use of 3
IRA 7Jnd Les., ell 114 1 1, sew 1 211.011 purchasers or owners of kites fronting on or adjaeeot
t he at aale to we street. sidevtslk, alley, square. park, or other
t an so- part
212ML Applkettan of Subchapter A
' (c) Near development may not begirt on the proper- ~
rtion The provisions of ~uochapter A that do not conflict ty until the development r!c: Is Neu with and ap-
! )rement with this subchapter apt ry to development pinta. proved by the municipality to accordance with Section
&dopted AN 1987, 70th Leg, ch. tt9.1 1, tf . Sept 1. 1987. 212.017.
~ r
Or, or f 112.011. Definitions (d) If a person Is required under Subchaptee A or
r
tract of ~ to this s an ordinance of the municipality to Me a wbdhision
u`xha) ter
arliyi to plat, a development plot Is not required in addition to
e bees- (1) 'Development' means the new construction the subdivision plaL
iren*nt or the enlargement „tarry exterior dimension of any Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 1 e9.1 I. eff. Sept, 1. 1987. Arwnd-
d adopted building, structc e, or Improvement ed by Ats 19&9, 71st Leg, ch. 1091,1 28, eff. Sept L 19M.
ter. (2) "Extraterritorial jurisdiction" means a munic•
ter of a fpalRy's extraterritorial jurisdiction as determined
under Chapter 12. j
Acre 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 119, 1 I, eft. Set . 1. 1987,
A 1212.041. Plans, Wes, and "nances , 2K
ej 0 . eft
After a publot hearing on the matter, the munkipah-
lasnalonl emir ygeneral plats, rules, or ordinances gov-
g development plats of land withln the limits and
117
1
i
"Y° ri
.za
~endaNo
iB~IQ2118fR,~ (gyp
ai. l C~-
Q11` 009NTON, =XA: MUNICIPAL BUILD1140 1 215 E. WKINNEY / OFN WS 78201
MEMOWINDUM ~Q
DA78I November 9, 1991
Tp; Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Frank H. Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and
Development
SUBJECTS Bob Browning Citi:en Report. Hawk Valley.
4 We understand that on November 15th Bob Browning will request that
the council enable the Argyle Water Company to extend a water line
b and serve the Hawk Valley subdivision located at the
intersection of Bonnie Brae and Highway 77 in Dentonos ETJ (aea
attached location map).
At issue are platting requirements. The property was subdivided,
that is tracts or lots were sold to individuals, in 1992 without
platting. The Planning and Zoning Commission formally decided that
it a water line were constructed to serve the development platting
would be required. (see attachment 1.) Administrative and legal
staff have advised Mr, Browning that platting would not be required
it no public improvements, such as the dater line, were built or
1 dedicated, or water was provided by veils.
A. predesign was submitted before subdivision in 1992. No plat was
submitted. A preliminary plat was submitted in 1991 by Browning
representing the current lot owners. Many variances are required
before approval. staff has noted to Mr. Browning it would
recommend approval of many. Variances includes
(1) paving Bonnie Bras and sidewalks along it. Staff is
suggesting a variance to paving to county rather than city
specifications and no sidewalks!
(2) drainage easementst
(3) right-of-way paving and sidewalks of the extension of
Allred Road.
8171588.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529
+wo ,
am,
I
Maycr and Members of the City council QandaNo,
Novesber 9, 1994 madalt
Page 2
dt~ .r ~I
As exaction variances, the ultimate decision on these variances
would be considered by the Council.
It appears that Mr. Browning's request is "a way around" the state
law requirement in section 212.012, attached, which states that
utilities (eq. Argyle Water) may not be connected unless a platting
certificate from Denton is provided. Attachment 1 is the
certificate that platting is required, so extension may not be J
made.
i
"F ank N. Ro bin•, AICp
tr« Attachments -
Wkr 1. Platting certificate with reduced plat. 1
E 2 Excerpt frois Chapter 212, W. a
s r
L Lloyd V. itarrell, City Manager
r, s .4'. " 4, planning 4 Zoning Commission
Amami
t
1
'fir, rr ~
f' e
+
.'4t
r
I✓ i j
r
ii L
~ ~ ~i:rtl
r
h
1
Yd
~ r~
gerttfrlMo
Q ATTACHMENT I
Ol? OIDENTOK MAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 213 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
May 26, 1994
E J. R. Bob Browning
I 2710 oak Lawn Lvenue
Dallas, TX 75219
Pat "Hawk Valley" Platting Determination
E Dear Mr. Browningl
' On May -25, 19948 the Denton Planning and zoning Commission
y µ j determined that platting in accordance with the City of Denton
subdivision and Land Dev-slopment ordinance of the 92.172 acre tract
(ses attachment 1) was required in 1992, unless no right-of-way,
easements, or other parts dedicated to the public or for use by the
owners in the subdivision would be laid out; and that platting is
required now.
This letter is to certify to that determination in accordance with
paragraph 212.01 5 of the Local Government code,
rank ob s, AICP nits walten
Y~ executive Dir for of ty a rotary
fi Planning and Development
Attachments 92.172 Acre tract map.
,
Avow 1
i,
8171500-8200 D/fW METRO 131.2599
I
r;
www
F
,
,
71Z'TACHHENT 1 ~94di~fert;,~~,
DW rl
bed
N ow,
wfr
.S i
x,W .
/ mom
IL
,h fe.f ~ ~ x t,~o►
Neafwrn. fpy
vem %w
/ MME upta fi1RST WNW r 1:44
/ r ~ l f1f
Orl I~t~ r~►~t~ y MN~ •
1~1M Af~fWM
y tier
ATTACMEyT 2
v 1 212.012 LOCAL. GOVERAr!►tE.vT CO*daNo~
1 212.11! Connection sf l'tilitlee I obuirud NeTd~It@
(s) AA entity descOwd by Subsection (b1 nay not I Plat Date A60-6
i-
Serve Of r AW% any land %%h Water sewer. elecuid. i le, The county elt to t
on the ci.
ty, M or other WAY scram unlou the entity hu n cited Plat NNW Nuated• and shall enter on the
been presented vM or otherwise holds a c*mAat* i plat a nrernnn to the volume and MO at .finch W
apPtitable to the land issued under Se Um 1120113. vwdtiat Mt,%ment is recorded.
(b1 TM prohibition established by Subsection (a) I (d) On the execution and recordu,g of the vacating
applies only to: 4uwment, the vacated plat has no eH4et
(1) a rounkiP&Uty and oMcials 0( a munkipaGty Acts IM, •Iph Log. th, 144. 1 I. Id. Sege 1, 19f1.
that provides Ater, senor, electricity, gas, or other 1 212.611. Replotting N'ith+out Yaeating Peece~
utility service;
(2) a munkipally owned or municipally operated tog Plat ,
A re
uality that peovfdee any of thaw Senices plat of s subdiviaiors or part ol, a sibdnisfoo
tit a public utility that provides any of thou oily be recotded and is eontroVing over the prMdinp
64"1014. plat without vaatioa of that plat If the rePISL
(4) a water supply or seer itMet eorpontka 11) is rigntd and ackwaltd1W by only the owm.
ormiud and operaLng under Chapter M Ant or ere a( the property being replotted,
IM 43rd t Oawv. Is% Called Seu)m 1933 ardo- (2) Is appra ed, &At, a pubbe hewin/ on the
tie 14341, Vernon s Texas Chic Sututtsl, that pro , matter at si4kh parks in intefest sold fitir.n4 have i
%id" any of those senfsea: an opportunity to be heard. by the munidpal au.
IS) a county that pr0vida any of thaw stnieft. N0^h responrble for Swovtng Plate: and
and 131 dos not ottempt to amend or nmoae any
111 a special district or authority crated by a cov'enanu or resvktiou
under Kate law that provides any of Now 1arvScea. Arty W. '0th Leg. eA t4. 1 t, ed. Sept L 1417.
(t) T%1a Sletioo does not apply to any vet covered 1 MAIL .4dditlonal R4qu1remenu rot certain
by a do%&pa,ent plat duly appmed under Subehap Repltu
to 9 or under an ordinance or mile relating to the
develo o"t plat, (a) to addition to romplianee with Seaton 212014. a
rtput %t 0(
jotm te eNte reWremenoe nu 114 ping plat must
(4) TM p vNVdm established by Subsection (at w
apPS" soy to Ivd that an sotky descnbed by Sub. . reQuf of this stvooo I.
cactus (b)(1% 121. r (3) let una or Tint comocu (11 durSty3 tTs wfttding fho years, say a the
wM trvkw es at aM Septesber 1. 1or. The area to be replotted wu tlmited by to Interim or
prolubkios tpptiea snit M land that an entity do. P*mvwm k+ning dmMtbO to noidential use
aeeibed by Subweeks (bM/1, (it or (1) Irst Terns or fw not More than two residential unite per lot; or
M1 conilteb trio sinless w or alter Septembr I. (2) any lot in the pnetdm Nat was !loud by.
11M. deed nos ie*w to m4ential are for sec more
AM 1111, Mh l 4114,1 I. at Sept I. In?. An" I than two rwidendd wu per k
lad y /lab 11111111111k flit hiss. da t. 1 oMbt tai Avg. It too, (III Nodes of the hearing rpubrd under Sectoo
Ara 19M tut Log. i 111 1 LK. se Sepa I. t4M. IILO14 obad be ghee boron the Ikh day boron the
i 21IL133. Vatath,g flit data of the bewq by.
(a) This p VrWAet or the trtet salved by a pit (t1 pubikstion in an oRkW onspapa or a new.v
may +sate the Plw at +ah tsrwe before any fat in the POP" of general eimdadoa In the County in wbkb
the
munidpalky Y located; and
Piet it sell. TM plat 1111 stated when a stgred, I
txbaw4edpd 4+slrrvrrettt declaring the peat rtpetd 111 (2I by wtittso notice, with a copy of SubxeUoo
approved and recorded W the manna ptesmUd for I W attached forwarded by the muNtlpl authority
lie 0101" 06L respnslA he approving PhU to the awven dIota
Ib1 that are in the ov(gtnal sabdtcislon and that art
of tote ta 0e b the PlaI lure been sold, the plan or within 2W feet of the law to be repNuA u W"t•
SAY ) Pid 1f U
of aY the owvwn 4 PKatmIou y in me ted on the &Wksdos ed on LN coat rocendy appm d muwipl to roil
Pitt vM apprwd or In the ease of a suWAsion Within the eatraterrt•
all
~5
CITY
--COUNCI
D
r
` i
3
~ t
C
oar ~F+
i. °x•
r
1
y
is
i j
OCL1
MY of DENTMo TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING* DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE(817) 5668307 '
Office of the City Manager
ME IORA"UM
TOt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager
FROM$ Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager ?
5
3 DATNt November 17, 1994
8L8JNCTe Increase in Fire Pension
As you are aware, Council approved a raise for all Civil Service
Fire Department personnel of 4.64 effective January i, 1995.
During budget discussions this year, members of the Fire Pension
4-. system approached us and asked if part of their proposed salary
increase could be used for increasing their pension contribution.
~f The staff advised them that the increased contribution would have
to be from their proposed pay increase and not as an add on to
their raise. In September, the Pension Board held an election of
,•r: ~ :~j their members to see if this was something that the Fire Pension
} members wanted to do. A majority of the membership voted, and a
majority of the membership approved this new contribution rate.
This election is part of their requirement for such an action, and
we believe that the membership executed all the requirements for
such an election.
y~;htr¢~ The majority of the Fire Pension members agreed that this 14 .
kris contribution would be out of the proposed 4.64 increase for the
Civil Service employees and it from the civilian employees who
participate in the Fire Pension program. They voted to start this
a r:S'•'~ new contribution on January 1, and staff does not see any problem
¢ '•R with this increased contribution since it comes from the employees.
We wanted to make the Council aware of this and to indicate to them
that such an increase in contribution also requires official action
by the council acknowledging and approving this increase in the
contribution level. We would propose to brines you this ordinance
t at the first meeting in December so that the computer programming
for payroll deductions, etc. can be modified to accommodate the
request of the Fire Pension membership.
,
I
pl :
"Dedicated to Quality Service"
:
a++cuy
4
l
t
' Lloyd V. Harrell
November 17, 1991
Page 2
0~
If you or the Council has further questions, 1 would
try and ewer them at your convenience, be happy to
c r ck Bve
*Val
i"tiN 1, t , D*puty City Manager
RBtbw
s 2, AFW005DA
Niy r e
;~aF e
r.
4 xr 4 y'!. ,
a'
rir ytr'
u'
~x"~,~t'' e......: `iYli„p a qsw .y.ti,+..ty/r0!/!a4W
ir~f
ar' s ay
,
r
ageodaNo
Agendalt r
Date
tha Coat a< lnv=uwat .ate a< etwi odk$
be pW y dte taw~ At Am dw state 7~ o `.i
00 A mku=M RUM i
he k6dwAr sa"$A caft mama
see. 79. C0606"do" (0 Fad rum who Y a
mraba of a tea Yaaaeat system "a "vats" lbs departaat
eapbya the make ft 0)" b tba 4+a~ kepi
a pr'wWd yb~ stbeceda~ (-0 of thY atxaoa, a eoaabtaloa
tagaw twdea mis atbaKMaa Y eotapatad M 14
empbyetfls paWk comptestla a a nr MaaYad y
I "r at br m=a( wa ~ kw in
t , spa b )o a(06 04" "W. boo r pw4m ip
parml dkw of dte wmkVdq
1 alai "id tba eataftbudow MqubW trda No "bacdom "salt pgma pedw sad VAOA that b the
i a) A ■ zklpdtp that ha eaplo)eea vhe are
P■eaatt ; b ■,■t■w pch oaf "s" petbt ~crpt as
M■"Wd by stbaecuoa (4 of diY pedal -+wbaloaa
rogtied ttadte dtb Pbaeefoa m emptaad a M wW
Caaptratla paM is the etatpbyaar a+ba ate
mesbea of dm eta A mtrddp.lq tk
At
K .Y~r a etCewl. trbefieaa *L _ nu MW by
aatpYlea
w! taa/a taM
The pomnY~ betif a' ■ ,tmaletp.fq by
atlases m■1
adopt a nr of an■ployer eaattbmo w drt b raw t o,
the tar ttrgtdred by 06 s buctIm
(0 Miedeipal eaoetlutloa dgeeaMol a~da sabaatloa
at ( mcdm we P■,■bh ack M)+A ptdad b
(0 cwmw owayamtegwned wow stt wom Wad 0)
> of *6 reetla an eampt"d oa do amye.Campo""
Camp"" to A Y ~ by to OW
er~f ddie ~ of
stais
i PAVA" of 1 M
wAk*dW
4
-0 im
Cu --A. - - . 13 aaoatdt paled r daawYd y dw
boil tf uwtea► '
(0 b& pens wm to a aaarbir CIA
r evreat / to «diem
a
>be ayttaa M a Do Ira taeat ■,M■ of Diet amee
} thm ls. The amend matt be dawsYxd by sew
by mast bald of the aohaatee:a d dte kprtmemm r!u a■
p■rt)tVe&l mewhm of the rdluuat ryataa A
e mq*td wbda PAacft Am 6 "of
a
1l ~
1
w
n ';.;'7;11911(, - ----~`7"
x
a
H
N
C
uv
w ~
GI U
a~
cv
o~
A W
N~
A
N
~ W
O
y U'
-M 4
14 0
411 w
W.,4
OW
U
m O
y) %4 L
DO
p "4
0
~
i
I
To increase contribution rate by one percent. This Will Saxe tnb
rate lot for firefighters, 9% for the city.
For T
Against Q
4,
1
CLTy---
~COUNCI
F
J
~ S
I v
t s
pro ~ t
0
a'
p.a n^yf
+YRI
r
r~deNo -U
AAanda~
Data
I OR O
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR
THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES)
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR }
AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials,
equipment, supplies or servicas in accordance with the procedures
of state law and City ordinances) and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the j
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefore; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted E
herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered {
bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the 1
"Bid Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved
as being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID ITEM
NUMBER NO VENDOR AMOUNT
1677 ALL DARR EQUIPMENT ;329,706.00
1682 ALL RFC ELECTRONICS $ 19,500.00
1683 ALL LEN T. DELONEY CO. $ 67,300.00
SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of
the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards, quantities 1
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting
approved an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter
into a formal written agreement as a resuiLt of the acceptance,
approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his
designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the
written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the
written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained ,
In the Bid Proposal and related documents herein approved and
accepted.
1
rnx+. ~
I
1
owl
J
Aq"l
SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above
numbered helms of the submitted bids, the city council hereby
authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and In
accordance with the approved bide or pursuant to a written contract
made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective
immed ate y. upon its passage and approval.
,c f
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1994.
r prix
~ t
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR }
I
I
ATTESTS
w a JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
1 0 Y
r $ '
r
He
ra ff
4 t
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
4; 4 a, MICHAEL'A. W1CEK, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
y r q o r:.
bye
("""ff1 Yr a
r+ +
r ,
IA
t•
R Sr f
I
1 [x1} ~.iJ
7
1
1 1
DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1994
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council a ndaNu
J4- 47
FROM: Lloyd V • Harrell, City Manager tpodall
SUBJECT: BID i 1677 - LANDFILL COMPACTOR ? aF-i0
RECOIU►11 NDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Darr Equipment Co. In
the amouAt o 329,706,00-
SU1MdARY: This bid is for the purchase of a Caterpillar Model 828C (702000 lb)
Landfitl Compactor including a 5 year or 7500 hour powertrain warranty. This unit
will be a fleet addition as approved in the budget process. It will be utilized as the
name indicates, to compact refuse at the City of Denton Landfill,
Request for Bid were malted to 6 potential equipment suppliers and only one response
was received. Caterpillar Manufacturing Is the only manufacturer of this size and
sty.o of equipment.
We choose the 826C (70,000 lb) machine over the lighter (50,000 lb) machine since
the experts estimate our compaction would be Iner9ased by 20-26%. This additional
compaction Is critical to maximize the remaining space in the landfill.
The $10,800.00 for the extended warranty Is included in our recommendation due to
1 the unfriendly environment in which the machine operates. It Is obviously a large
machine requiring tools and equipment we do not currently have for proper
maintenance and repair. The entire drive line including engine, transmission
differential and axles are included in this full parts and labor warranty. The
standard warranty is 1 year or 1500 hours. We feel the additional cost is justified as
insurance against future major cost items.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PRG :RAMS DEPARTMENT3011 GROUPS AFFECTED: Landfill Operations and Fleet
:Servi;oes
I FISCAL WACT: The purchase of this machine will be funded by Motor Pool
Operations and repaid on a monthly payment basis by the using department account
1
" number 030-024-0803-8508.
Res u" Js$bml d:
1 d .HrCity Manager
Ap ved:
j ame: Tom . Shaw, C.P.M.
Title; Purchasing Agent
en.~w
i
1 BTn +e - len
BID NAME LANDFILL COMPACTOR DARR CASE
EQUIPMENT POWER
OPEN DATE OCTOBER 25, 1994
I
'k
1 L ,v'1 ;sr"fe+% r ;:k: Ro. ["'Ty CIS 1`~1.
My "N
1 70,000 LB LANDFILL $318,906.00 NO BID
COMPACTOR
OPTIONS:
1.
5 YEAR 7500 HOURS $10,800.00 `
WARRANTY
2. CARON WHEELS $30,059.00
1
MAKE CATERPILLAR
MODEL 8260 QUO
DELIVERY 60-90 DAYS
w !
1
1 191^ ":'~4 'l l II i
r
1
i
.
4
DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1994 j
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 4Q6f1d8N0
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, city manager Agendalt
' Date l.l
SUBJECT: BID # 1682 - WATTHOUR TESTING J30ARD SYSTEM[ Off'
RECOIDMDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder RFC
i Electronics In the amount of $19,500.00 with delivery In thirty (30) days.
SUMMARY: This Test Board will allow the City of Denton to test the new electronic
f meters currently being installed for many industrial customers. The use of the
electronic meters will give the City of Denton the capability to bill demand to 4
decimal places versus current two decimal place billing. In addition it will give us
the capability to program different rate structures for readout to the customers.
Expected demand revenue Increase for billing demand at 4 decimal places is expected
to total over $100,000.00.
Public Utility Board recommend approval
4.
i` BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
` PROGRAMi3 DEPABTYENTSORGROUPSAFFECTED: Electric Metering DivIalonand
act a ter est program,
FISCAL IMPACT. 1995-1999 Capital Improvements Plan No. 95-1034-03, (#40,000
S
udget . ecount 0610-134-1034-3950-9233.
f:
,f Reap allire
oy ub ted:
. Hll
City Manager
x Approved t
Name: om . S W,C.P, i.
x Title, Purchasing Agent r
su.Awro►
n1 }
ry-
abr w." y
}
~v., , -.,,c,l,a-rrn'r»rssaarr~'gG1'"•+2~:~'
a
- -1602 j 1
1 NNAME WATTHOUR TESTING TEMPLE AVO WATT RFL CUMMINS
BOARD SYSTEM MULTI HOUR ELECTRONICS
PEN DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1994 AMP
DESCRIPTION
VENVO
1. 1 EACH ATTH
OUR TESTING BOARD $22,579.00
SYSTEM 621,450.00 $26,450.00 619,600.00 NO BID
#
ALL ITEMS, INCLUDING i-
i COMPUTER
(K E L(F) AND
OPTIONS
1A f EACH ATTHOUR TESTING BOARD $t9,947.00 $18,950.00 $24,600.00 $17,000.00 II(
SYSTEM ONLY j
1 EACH COMPUTER (F) $1,526.00 $1,450.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 I
1 EACH OPTIONS(
Iq $1,105.00 $1,050.00 $450,00 $450,00
E
1 EACH UPGRAD OPTIONS (L) NS NA $14,760.00 $19,450,00
DELIVERY 8-10 WKS 60 DAYS 112-140
30 DAYS
DAYS
AVO
MULTI AMP WATT HOUR
ALT' #E2100
r , $21,450.00
619,600.00
$1,600.00
$46,0.00
NA
r 12-146 DAY'S
r
l I
1o
ON"
'v
r
i
W~j
DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1994
I
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council]
AoFROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Ibda)!D
" ~ AQeodal
SUBJECT: BID # 1683 - 69KV CIRCUIT BREAKERS 1;e
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting
spec (cations, Len T. Deloney Co., Inc. In the total amount of $67,300.00. r-j^
p SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of two (2) 69KV Circuit Breakers to be
used by lie Substation Department. These breakers will replace 1965 breakers at
Spencer and at Denton North Interchanges, which will increase the integrity of the
system.
This purchase is part of the Electric Utilities C.I.P. Upgrade of the 69 Loop.
Three (3) bid proposals were received in response to twenty-two (22) bid packages }
mailed to vendors. !
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Danny Scott dated 11-9-94.
PROGRAMS DEPARTUMTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Substations Division, Electric
UUBTe-9, U ty Customers by the City o Denton.
FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted funds for 1995 Capital Improvements for Electric
Substations Account Number #810-132-1032-3620-9217-C69KVOIA with a balance of
$185,000.00.
Respe ully sub t s
L oyd . Harre 1
City Manager
Prepared By:
Name: De a Harpoo i,
Title: Senior Buyer
Approved:
' -
am;: Tom D.Shaw,C.P.M.
Titles Purchasing Agent
SWAM"
j
y
DATE: NOVEMBER 220 1994 +
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
i
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Ape *No
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager Age
SUBJECT: BID t 1683 - 69KV CIRCUIT BREAKERS ()Btb ~p
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting ll
specifications, Len T. Deloney Co., Inc. in the total amount of $67,300.00.
1
SUMMARY: This bid Is for the purchase of two (2) 69KV Circuit Breakers to be
used by t Substation Department. These breakers will replace 1965 breakers at
Spencer and at Denton North Interchanges, which will increase the Integrity of the
system.
This purchase la part of the Electric Utilities C.I.P. Upgrade of the 69 Loop. g
Three (3) bid proposals were received in response to twenty-two (22) bid packages
mailed to vendors.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Danny Scott dated 11-9-94.
PROGPAMIS DEPARTMIENTSORGROUPSAFFECTED: Substations Division, Electric
WdUTfZ, Utility Customers by the City o Denton.
FISCAL IMPACT:. Budgeted funds for 1995 Capital Improvements for Electric
SuRt-a ont -e ant Number #610-132-1032-3620-9217-C69KV01A with a balance of
$1VA)000.00.
Reap ully sub t d:
i
1 oyd Harrell t
` City Manager
Prepared By:
Name: Denise Harpall k
.
Title: Senior Buyer
Approved.
Nam: Tom D.S aw,C.P.M.
Title: Purchasing Agcnt
fu,~x
i
i
bass-~~
1
ID V
ID NAME 69 KV CIRCUIT WESCO MITSUBISHI LEN T. LEN T.
BREAKERS DELONEY DELONEY
PEN DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1994 ALT
1, DESCRIPTIUN VENDOR
1. 2 EACH CIRCUIT BREAKERS, 69K1' $32,900.00 $37,600.00 $33,650.00 $31,650.00
OUTDOOR, SF6
MANUFACTURER ABB MIT. SIEMENS
PART NUMBER 72PM3120 70SFMT32D SP-726- 1
p
31.5
a . q
3PST,2000
DELIVERY ARO 22 WKS 24 WKS 12 WKS
E
f
TECHLINE
COOPER POWER SYSTEMS
LOUIS M PATE (LMP)
CUMMINS
j
i
f; t
YY-77TT OR
. 4 h a~
wv:wA#YMasawcllwf[sar.+r.+...,..-.....•..--•__... ,
06...
j
WAge ' al
x
CITYof DENTON MUNICI PAL UTILITIES/ 90 t •ATexas Street/ Deeton, TX 76201
+ MEMORANDUM
T0i Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent
THRt7: Jim Harder, Director of Electric
Ray D. Wells, Suparintendent
Substations/Metering/Communications
r k ROM: Danny Scott, Foreman of Substations
DATE: November 09, 1994
SUBJECT: 69 KV CIRCUIT BREAKER BID #1683
i
After evaluating the bids for two 69Kv circuit breakers we
recommend award of bid to Len T. Deloney Co. Inc. for the Siemens j
SF6 circuit breaker. The reasons for recommendation of bid to
w Siemens are as follows:
Mitsubishi Electric Power Products, Inc.
I They failed to meet specifications on page 4 of 6,
Construction #7., which states:
r• 1
s 4~
One interrupter get phase with pneumatic- operating.
mechanism. The 70 SFMT 32 D Dead Tank SF6 circuit
o breaker has a motor-charged spring mechanism.
;y+r The price for the 70 SFMT Dead Tank SF6 circuit breaker is
037,500:00. The total cost is *75,000.00 with a 24 week
' delivery time.
ABB Power T 6 D Company Inc. '
They failed to meet specifications on page 4 of 6,
Construction #1, which states:
41. One interrupter per phase with pneumatic operating
mechanism. The 72PM31-20, outdoor, dead tank, IP6
circuit breaker has a motor-charged spring mechanism.
The price for the 72PM31.20, outdoor, dead tank, SF6 circuit
breaker is #32,900.00. The total cost is $65,800.00 with a 22
s week delivery time.
tr1'.,
FPx '
n
1
ApendaNo~"_'~ ~
Aggnd<1t
Date
Len T. Deloney Co., Inc. v' !Q
t The specifications of the Siemens SP•72.2-31.5,3PST, 2000 AMP,
69Kv nominal voltage, rated 31.5Ka maximum symmetrical
t interrupting capability pnetunatic operated, frame mounted
outdoor SF6 puffer circuit breaker is the only bid that meets
all specifications as requested. The City will not have to
' purchase any additional or special tools because we have four
of the Siemens in service at this time. Siemens will be able j
r ;`4 to deliver the breakers within 12 weeks.
r, r recommend that we award the bid for Siemens breakers to Len T.
Deloney Co., Inc., low bid meeting specifications as issued at the
i price of $33,650.00 each, for the total cost of $67,300.00.
i Respondents were as follows: !
Len T. Deloney $33,650.00 ea.
Mitsubishi Electric $37,500.00 ea.
Wesco-Abs $32,900.00 ea.
Lewis Moore Payette No Sid
Cooper Power Systems No Bid
x
Cummins No Bid
"sz Techline No Bid
ia.. cc: Robert Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities
Jim Harder, Director of Electric Utilities
Ray D. Wells, Superintendent of Substations, Metering, and
~l. communications
Tjo
14
wD iY
~Ys
2
, rq r
!r
~Y*
XITY~
- ---COUNCI'
a
r
f n r~
w
~ ~ 4r
I
1
{
ta,2.4au
` +.R w
fr
{
{ N0 944039
AP*1
. 105
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES i
OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH
PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS: AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section. 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides
that procurement of items that are only available from one source,
including: items that are only available from one source because of
patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies: films,
manuscripts or books: electricity, gasp water and other utility
t purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment:
and library materials for a public library that are available only
from the persona holding exclusive distribution rights to the
4
materials) need not be submitted to competitive blda: and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to procure one or more of the
items mentioned In the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SE IC, i. That the following purchases of materials,
equipment or supplies, as described in the "Purchase orders"
attached hereto, are hereby approved:
PUPCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
51153 SOUTHWEST FLUID PRODUCTS $270095.00 I
SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above
items shall not constitute a contra.-t between the City and the
person submitting the quotation for such items until such person
shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing {
Department.
" SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I
and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said aontracta is hereby
( authorized.
.
r
yy
genda6 ~
~ ate .._.Cl.~► pa^( ~j
SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effect ~vAl/
immediately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1994.
„ t !
rl
BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
E
E
yn r" t, ATTESTt ~ ,
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BYE
s, a c
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORDS
MINAEL.A. BUCUp ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
t BYi
Jfr* S ,4; j~ i1n ~yV
t 'Grt' 4
I
9 •r~ .`f fit. rtu
s
Yfl
e~ t
Owl
1
DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1994
;I CITY COUNCIL REPORT ,pendaNo -D3
Agefldalt
TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council We
FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manage-e G,
SUBJECT; PURCHASE ORDER # 51153 - SOUTHWEST FLUID PROD
RfiC010dIWDATION: We recommend this purchase order to Southwest Fluid
Products be approved in the amount of $27,095.00 for five (5) Sanitary Sewer open
channel now meters.
SUIOkIARY: This purchase order Is a sole source acquisition for five Marsh-
cB rney Sanitary Sewer Flow Meters. Southwest Fluid Products is the exclusive
supplier of these meters and therefore not available from any other source. A similar
requirement was submitted for formal bid in 1992 and only one bid, Southwest Fluid
Products was received. The price at that time was 58,959.00, currently It Is
$5,419.00.
These now meters are controlled by use of Flo-Tote T-40 software which is
proprietary to Marsh-McBirney Inc. and protected by copyright. Only Marsh-
McBirney meters are oompatible with our existing system and application software.
Texas Local Government Code Chapter 252 exempts proprietary, sole source items
from the bid process.
i
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #51153, Proposal from Southwest Fluid Products,
Inc.
` 4 k PROGRAIIS,_ _ * DEPARTI[ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Waste Water Treatment Plana
FISCAL IWACTI Funds for this purchase are available in the 1992 Revenue Bond
u got account 673-082-RB92-V510-9107.
Res ctfully s tted:
Ll V. acre #
City Manager
Approved:
" Name: Tom .Shaw, C.P.M. i
Title: Purchasing Agent
` i s~o.~onmis
.
Y~y
M.X
PURCHASE ORDER NO, 5115 3 THIS IS A
invo yes, de Hulivery nt sups, appe ewer ses,all (IF MAR CONFIRMING ORDER I i
CUM s, n L~JI
Dens, hoses packing ales and tills DO NOT DUPLICATE
Rep No: Bid No Date. 11 09 94 Pape No. 01
F'URCHASWG DIVIS04 1 901 019 D~NTONf TEXAS TEXAS 78201-4354
8 1 71383-7 100 DIFW METRO 8 1 712 6 7-004 2 FAX 8171382-4692
VENDOR SOUTHWEST FLUID PRODUCTS
NAME/ P 0 BOX 841 DELIVERY CENTRAL RECEIVING S50
ADDRESS ADDRESS W/WW ENGINEERING I:
WEATHERFORD TX 76086 901 TEXAS STREET
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
TERRY GRIMES
l VENDOR NO. 80151001 DELIVERY QUOTED 11 30 94 FOB DESTINATION BUYER TS TERMS
~ 7 `,TF~,}- .'•f,':: ',i'k ~ ,rx, 'i.,^.+' .y d. ;.~i<.. N:.,;r z:
001 5.00 EA VENDOR CAT. t N / A NFG NAME 5,395.000 26,975.00
' CITY 111 89045
SANITARY SEWER OPEN CHANNEL FLOW METER (260 A)
'r z 002 120.00 86 VENDOR CAT. i N / A MFG MANE 1.000 120.60
CITY 0 96286
SHIPPIMO CHAAgE
P GE TOTAL t 09 .00~
GR ND TOTAL s 27 09 .00 E
r O1` 673, 082 RB92 V510 9107 27,095.00 jl
t
i
WE" 915ThINTIONS { 1. irmf Net 30 RAW' .a.+" .r..a.u
1. Seal rlnM unyoke Math #*Kew co". 1 4. Shippirp msvucvons: F.00. Oes imW prepaid ab+.n .n«, . 1F.J40
1 ro ie - Accows PriAls 9 No federal or state salts can "I be Included
t1S & McKwbrrryy SL In prices bipel ure ++9 swn
OeneN Tx )it0, 47!! PURCHASING
.
j
PAGE 1 of 4
r
southwest Fluid Producte, Inc. Aper&No
P. 0. Nom 941 Apdall , i
Weatherford, Texas 76086
( 817) 594-0224 oat !
11- - Vl'2 24 39313
CONFIRMING PROPOSAL
October 289 1994
Ouote #94-1350
CITY OF DENTON
" PURCHASING DEPAR'iMENT
i 901-8 TEXAS STREET
s, DENTON, TEXAS 76201
ATTNi MR. GARY MYERS
PROJECTS MARSH McBIRNEY MODEL 260A
We are pleased to quote the following equipments
Five (5) Marsh McBirney model 260-A portable meter.
TOTAL PRICE FOS factory with freight allowed to abel% or
nearest passable road $26.975.00.
1 Estimated shipment-I toA weeks after receipt of engineers
and/or credit approval.
-Terms are Net 30 Days from date of invoice with no retainage
allowed
i
-The right to make and invoice for partial shipments is !
specifically reserved. Prices quoted are for equipment only.
-Prices are valid for 30 days from date of quotation c
-Conduit, wiring and controls nor specifically not mentioned
are not included.
-interpretation of plans and specifications is not
guaranteed.
E SOUTHWEST FLUID PRODUCTS. INC.
Marty A.?Paydon Wimberley
Office Manager
"CITY~-
f.
-COUNCI
I k
f 3
i
i
J
p
Y,
~s
s 1
G `s
•
}cif. t~t~.
a:+v
f:\IADOCS\RES\6TERECOR.R
4P*No
jai a
1LL~ r n~
~ 17~IV
1 DF'3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GIVING GENERAL TELEPHONE OF THE SOU7`HWEST, THIRTY (30)
DAYS NOTICE TO PRODUCE RECORDS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED OF GTE BY THE
CITY MANAGER IN HIS LETTER OF FEBRUARY 10, 1994 RELATING TO AN
AUDIT OF GI FRANCHISE FEE PAYMENTS TO THE CITY; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Texas requires public
utilities to compensate municipalitS.es for the use and rental of
public rights-of-way and utility easements by such utilities; and
WHEREAS, the Charter for the City of Denton adopted by the
" voters of the City of Denton on the 24th day of February, 19591
requires franchise fees to be charged public utilities not to be
e less than 2% of the gross receipts of the business being conducted
by the franchisees earned for services rendered in the City of
r? Denton; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton granted a franchise to ceneral
Telephone of the Southwest (GTE) pursuant to the Charter on the 4th
day of October, 1983, and such franchise agreement provided it was
subject to all of the provisions of the charter; and
d tWI
` WHEREAS, citizens of Denton and litigation by near-by cities
with their telephone franchisees have raised serious questions
regarding whether or not certain telephone companies, including
possibly GTE, are listing the full value of services provided to
ratepayers in the gross receipts upon which franchise fees are
based; and
WHEREAS, the City retained th9 auditing firm of Reed-Stowe i
Co., Inc., to audit GTE's records relating to its revenues within
the City of Denton from the beginning of the present franchise
agreement (1983) through 1992 to determine if the appropriate
franchise fees have been paid by GTE; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager on February 100 1994, requested from
~,r.:• GTE certain records needed by Reed-Stowe to determine in accordance
with auditing principles what GTE's gross receipts were in the City
of Dentor for the period from 1983 through 1992; and I,
WHEREAS, GTE did not fully comply with the records request and
tea on November 4, 19941 the City Manager requested again the needed
records, and
' WHEREAS, GTE on November 101 1994, advised the City Manager
that it would not comply with his request for records; and
WHEREAS, the Cityfs Charter requires a holder of a franchise to
allow the City to examine at any time its accounts and records; and
1 r
ApdaNo --D
Apertdaltb01-_~~ _b-
eta -Y Ct
a o~3
I WHEREAS, preliminary audit findings reflect the possibility of
underpayment by GTE from 1988 to 1993 of franchise fees of
approximately 2.8 million dollars; and
WHEREAS, the failure of GTE to pay franchise fees owed requires
taxpayers of the City to pay higher taxes to fund budgetary items
which should be paid by franchise fees properly collected; and
a, WHEREAS, the public interest does not allow the City to
"a subsidise a public utility in the payment of fees for the use of
public rights-of-way and thereby provide a gift to such utility's
stockholders or to Companies contracting with such utility and not
r^ paying for the use of City rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the franchise agreement with GTE provides that if GTE
is found to bei in default of such agreement it shall be supplied
notice of the default and given a period of sixty (60) days to cure
same; and
7 WHEREAS, the City realizes that a finding of a default in a
contract is a serious matter which can result in legal ramifica-
tions that can stifle the business relationship between the parties
to such a contract; and
WHEREAS, the City has always looked upon GTE as a "good
neighbor", always ready to assist both in manpower and monetary
contributions to public service projects that enhance Denton's
quality of life; and
sT a WHEREAS, GTE has a fiduciary duty to its stockholders to comply
with the laws of this land (which includes the City's Charter) as
the City Council has to protect the public interest, even when a
cherished neighbor disagrees; and {
C °WHEREAS, the City can not allow any business or individual
"r within its corporate limits to operate above the law; and
WriEREAS, to remove any doubt that the City council concurs with
the city Manager's action requesting records of GTE; NOW THEREFORE,
( Y
" THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREV RESOLVESO i
SECTION 1. That General Telephone of the Southwest is hereby
given thirty (30) days from the effective date of this resolution
to produce the records requested by the City Manager in his letter j
of February 10, 1994, in their entirety.
z '
~ r
f
a PAGE 2
kq, i
y~.A
x '
uv.ex
I
Ag~tbaNa '
IyQOdaf
Date `-r
303
SECTION IT. That if the records requested by the City Manager
are not received in tie office by 6:00 p.m. on December 22, 19940
the City Manager is hereby directed at his earliest opportunity, In
compliance with the Open Meetings Act and City Ordinances, to place
on the agenda for a council meeting an item declaring GTE in
default of the provisions of its franchise agreement and city
Charter, and the City Attorney is hereby directed to have the
appropriate resolution prepared for such meeting that would allow
the city Council to take immediate action to hold GTE in default.
SECTION Iii. That this resolution shall be effective immedi-
ately upon its passage and approval
DICTION IV. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to
forward a copy of this resolution to Melvin Willis, District
Manager of GTE Telephone Operations, P. 0. Box 520, Denton, Texas
76202. t
Eftective this the day of , 1994. f
1 BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR
s
ATTEST!
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
a _
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
x~? + ~ MICHAEL A. BUCEK, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
tAkS~?; t t
` kc~ LK b
BY:
9
LM1` ~ r Y ~
PAGE 3
x •,1•
at r r .
'r,
COUNCI
{
G
r
fi
r ` b s
f 4rOx
E
p .v ~y
''JOIE
Handout to Council 11/22/94
Z IV. Notke Requirements Governmental actions taken is violation of he Wice
requirements of the Open Meetings Act are voidable. V.T.C.S. art,
A Coot.-at 6252.17, 13(a), if some actions taken at a meeting do not violate the
notice requirements, while others do, only the actions in violation of the
i1rc Open Meetings Act requires written notice of all meetings. act are voidable. Point IsabellndeA Sch. Dist. v. Irmofose, 797 S.W.2d
Scct6o 3A(a) of the act provides in part: 176,182.83 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1990, writ denied); rte Infra part
V111.B.
I Written notice of the date, hour, place, and
su'+ject of each meeting held by a governmental The notice must be sufficient to apprise the general public of the
body shalt be given before the meeting as subjects to be considered during the meeting. In City of San Antonio v.
prexribed by this section Fourth Court of Appeals, 820 S.W.2d 762 (Tea. 1991), the Tetras Supreme
Thu; a governmental body must give the public advance naive of the Court addressed the sufficiency of the following description in the
agenda for a city meeting:
subjects it will consider in an open meeting or a closed executive
session. Car Faders, Inc. Y. Bond of Trasfees, 706 S.W.2d 956, 958 An Ordnance determining the necessity for and
(Tex. 1986); Path K Morgan, 672 S.W.2d 470 (Tex App.••Tylcr 19181, Authorize the condemnation of certain properly
writ rcPd o.t.e.). Neverthekss, no Provision of the Open Meetings Act in County Blocks 414161, 41
I requires a governrntntal body to state in the adice whether it will 80. 88 and 4297 in
Southwest Bexar County for the construction of
consider a particular item in executive. ses:ron rather than in the open the Applewhite Water Supply Project.
meeting A governmental body, however, may indicate in its notice for
a Meeting that certain subjects may be considered In executive session. 820 S.W2d at 764. The owner of an oil and as lease in the land to be
Subsrgtteot consideration of those subjects in open meeting insleaJ of condemned ar 8
execativ: session will not violate the Open Meetings Act. ~ that this notice violated the subject requirement of
section 3A(a) because it did 'not deserve the condemnation ordinance,
by 1987 lo,cxprefsly, and in particular the knot to be condemned
that ordinance, i
n
0 Ag st d
, ► sufficient detair to notify an owner reading the description that the city ;
y, was considcrurg condemning his land. Id The Texas Supreme Court
rejected this argument that the notice be sufficiently detailed to notify
CS. art. 6252-17, f 3A (h); Acts 1987,
specific owners their tracts might be condemned, and stated the 'Open i
dL 2_;
349 r S ti °O, y" Mectrngs Act is not a legislative scheme for service of procez% it has no
due process implications.... (i)ts purpose is to provide 'openness at
aterSupply Corp v. Baton Springs-Edwards Aqurrer every stage of (a governmental body's) deliberations." /d at 7'65
Conservation Dirt, 784 SAM 79, SS (Tex App.-Austin 1989, writ (quotingAcker v. Terar Water Comm % 790 S.W2d 299,300 ex 1990
deailco River Rd Nelglrbahood Asi% v. SmA Tam S,. ids, 920 (bracketed language added by City of San Antorlo court).
S.W2d SSt, SU (Tex App.--Sao Antonio 1986, writ dism'd w.o.j.) (both
applying prior version of ad requiring only a statement that emergency Relying on tW purpose of the Open Meetings Act io provide tho
ecsted). general public access to governmental decision m skins, the Texas '
Supreme Court held the condemnation notice valid &IUe it apprised the
public at large in general terms that the city would consider the
14 15
«3w[T'»rS,.h/iw.4FiY.w.ilr an..u...a.........~.....~_'
(11
1 (b) A Slate governmental body shall furnisN notice to the (h) Notlrs of a meeting must be posted in a pldcc redJily
Secretary of State, who shall then post the notice on a bulletin board to
be located in the main office of the. Secretary or state at a place accessible to the general public rt all times for ut least 72 hours
convenient to the public, preceding the scheduled time of the mectiag, except that notice of a
meeting of a state board, commission, department, or officer having
(c) A City governmental body shall haw a notice posted on a statewide jurisdiction, other than the Texas Workers' Compensation
bulletin bond to be located at a place convenient to the public in the city Commission or the governing board of an Institution of higher education,
hal1 must be posted by the Secretary od Stale for at least seven days preceding
the day of the meeting. in use of emergencyor urgent public ncccssilt
(d) A county goveramental body shall have a notice posted on a whleh shall he clearly identified in the notice, It shall be sufficient if the
bulleds board located at a place convenient to the public in the county notice is posted two hours before the meeting is convened. Any public
'i courthouse. official or person who is designated or authorized to peat notices of
meetings by a governmental body in accordance with Sccl•aw 3A of this
( eg N l
posted on a bulletin Act ~haq Pod the notcc ukl
e) A schaal district shall have a notice
C w ~ •
s
board located at t place (.mwn;cnt to the PubGc in its central
TT, FI~T~ X M= ZT,
administrative office and shall give notice by telephone or telegraph to3
. n, YI r r
any news media requesting such notice and consenting to pay any and all r a
expeaaea incurred by the school district in providing special notice. '1a,, t, ""stied further, "the
h
nneetrng has been calved with notice tereof posted in rccoxdan:e with
(f) A governmenlal body of a water district or other district or this subsection, additional subjects may be added to the agenda fix such
political subdivision covering all or part of four or more counties shall meeting by posting a supplemental notice, in which the emergenq Of
have a notice posted at a place convcnleat to the public in its { urgent public necessity requiring considcratoon of such additional
subjects ofTia, and shall also furnish the notice to the Secretary of ects is expressed. To the event of an emergency meeting, OF in the
Slate, who shall then post the notice on a bulletin (ward looted in the event any subject is added to the agenda in a supptemcnt■t nNkY posted
mtlo c pt of the Secretary of State at a place convenient to the public; for a meeting other than an emergency meeting, it shall be tufkkilt If
the notice or supplemental notice h posted two hours before the mcelhng
add it shall ahso furahh the ootim to the county clerk of the county in
and
which the administrative office of the district or political subdivision is is convened, the presiding officer or the member ailing such
emergency meeting or posting supplemental notice to the agenda any,
r fi located, who shall then post the notice Gn a bulletin board located at a
play e»ovedleat to the public eo the county courthouse. other meeting shall, if request therefor contamong all pertinent
iarormatiod has previously been fled at the headquarters of the
(g) The governing twos of a water district other district, or governmental body, give notice by telephone or telegraph to my acws
disci political wbdivh media requesting such notice and consenting to pay any and all eapcn.ws
f
io o, ere:pt a district or pvtiilical subdivision incurred by the governmental body in providing such special adke. The
described la Subsection (f) of tfis section, shall haze a notice posted al a
police provisions for legislative committee meetings shall be as proviJcd 3
place ooovenicnt to the publ'r. It Its administrative office, and shall also
furnish the notice to the eor,dy clerk or clerks of the county or counties by the rules of the house and senate.
' In which the duv;id or political subdivision is loafed. The county clerk
ahali then pat the notice on a bulletin bound located at a plan;
cgawaleal to the public to the county courthouse, f M
r 64 65 t
I
,
1
1
4141
R
Fro I
1 N'
• Handout to Council 11/22/94
! is
1
TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
+
r
b
r
i ,
INTERIM REPORT
raj , Nx y POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
r
~J,Y!j(
r 'F
{f~ ',^'A[ 4 n
{~1 f . da.
a
lf~~`~~~J r{Y 1
~xf+1F 1 ~ I
i ~
44
I
re
/'~i
1{~r
1
F
REASON FOR TMPA'S
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
1M
1 ~ w, ,~rv rf
r`r r`'r ► TMPA Must Move to a Different Mining Area
at a Cost of $15 Million
f Y!fo It 4;, +i
K•r' a 'r t M a r
Sa War's! t+! F
k` ` r t~.! ► Maintenance Costs Are High with Grimes
x,F y f n County Lignite
1t f~ i +
i
x f,
f~~~~'~ ► Other Utilities Have Switched to Western
Wyoming Coal to Save Money
g r,.
f '
rr,tl , ~
5 r
°i ► New Generating Techuologies and Efficiencies f
r ~
Coupled with Low Cost Natural Gas Make
a
New Plant Costs as Cheap as the Operating
and Maintenance Costs of the Gibbons Creek
.r , Power Plant
r
40
;
h
/}+a
J t~ ~ 4
~Y
a t
t r
rte ~
S[hl6 `0
Yi
It
r TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
k 1 (TM `J A
jab
!
~ II Y
~rl ,I o I
~ Jf rv1 ~~'iK ► • ~
Created in 1975 '
t ~~I Y
f :j
, h ,,1 ► Bryan, Denton, Garland, Greenville
I tY C
~,,a{~~~ ► Purpose:
Provide Electric Power & Energy for the .
Four Cities
s
► TMPA Provides 65% of Denton's Power &
F " Energy
I~
!
I
I
1 r . l
+ ~ x
y I l
y I.Yy
ELECTRIC INDUSTRY ISSUES - 1975
► Federal/State Government Mandated Electric
Utilities to Stop Using Natural Gas
RAJ '
► Texas .ignite was Lowest Cost Fuel
► Western Low Sul her Coal Costs were
' Escalating
L
Railroad Rates From mWyoming were Volatile
tes
►
► No Public Utility Commission Therefore,
' Wholesale Power Contracts were Higher Than
Owning Generation
► Therefore Cities Decided to Use Texas
Lignite
3
t
raw
i
1 -
ELECTRIC UTILITY ISSUES 1994
► Natural Gas Industry Deregulated and Ample
Low Cost Gas Available 1
a. 1
► Major Technological Advances in Efficiencies
of Gas Powered Electrical Power Plants
► Western Fuel Costs are Stable and Excess
Mine Capacity has Resulted in Low Prices
3 ► Railroad Transportation Rates are Stable
x ► Electric Utility Ind '..Jtry Being Deregulated
► Many Independent Power Producers Entering
the Electrical Production Business
A' iY `A"r E
14
i
c.a.,, ..Yri
S
1
TMPA FACILITIES/CONTRACTS
1
• G
,
405,000 Kilowatt Power Plant in runes
w
County
20 Miles East of Bryan/College Station
i
► 20,000 Acre Liglaite Mine in Grimes County I
sC •ly 'q i
with Leases for Two Draglines Plus Conveyor
l
J 1,,
i
to Mine
f ► Contract with Navasota Mining
Approximately two million tons per year ,
f ► Transmission Lines and Interconnections to
f
TU Electric and Transmission Cor tracts
o. Transmission Lines and Delivery Point
t' 's Substations at the Four Cities
I S
,
i
1
^aim
i
4
' POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS ISSUES ~
► Consultant - Burns & McDonnald
5, f
` ' Y ► TMPA Staff Directed Study and Developed
Report Narrative
E s1y
1. BASE CASE:
Continue Present Operation
2. WEIRCO CASE:
~t
TMPA Takes Over Mine Operation
>r=;
V ~ PRB CASE:
Convert Plant to Burn Powder
t Rive. Basin Wyoming Coal
4. PRB HI CASE:
' Increase Cost and Escalation of
PRB Case
S. LAYUP & REFOWER:
Layup Gibbons Creek Plant and
za,
Add Combustion Trrbines to
Garland and Bryan Power Plants
6. LAYUP & Pig '-:CHASE:
,n l Layup Gibbons Creek Plant and
Purchase Power
1 ~ 5
1
i
rwa
BASE CASE
o Electricity Produced M Billion KWH
o Total Cities Energy 5,2 Billion KWH
it;'
II
o Agency Net Price SJOVKWH
sy ~
1"6
sir
o Cities Average Price 417C/KWH
r
,
o Net Present Value of Cities Average
t t " Cost from 1995 to 2011 Billion
6, 7
r,
r a
r ,
r
N':I.1:Ifj•
J1
V
W1
Il
,
a
r ;I
WEIRCO CASE VS BASE CASE
a:
Weirco Base
o Electricity Produced-kwh- 2.9B 29B
yr )tM fl, lj, 1
o 'T'otal Cities Energy-kwh- 599B SM
n
LL1p5u J f 'V ~ f
A 4
if Y Y
o Agency Net Price 4/kwh 515 5.30 a
(1996)
i I
o Cities Average Price-G/kwh 4.74 4.71
{
a o Net Present Value of Cities
f Average Cost 1995 to 2011 $3.735 $3.809
1 F,
o NPV Savings $74 Million
r
ff i
dot{ ✓ r f
• d i {
F 1/ i V
~w
p.> •cM
q; -91
I,
1
i
moo,
j C'os~,of Power
Fuel Switch Comparison
Weirdo TMPA Takeover
73 Base Case G(3M
70 Weino TWA Takeover
65 .i i..
1 t':Y K 1, J 60 1-11-11111, .i .1 ,
55 f S. ......................t............1..... ....f .
POW
,50 1 . .i..
45 1..., i. .
. j 1
40
;r 1495 1997 1449 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Year
II,
v7
t
d
a
,
f
i
1
.
{ PRB CASE
j
PRB Base
o Electricity Produced-kwh 3.2B 2.9B
o Total Cities Energy-kwh 61.B 5SB
i
M
a,
o Agency Net Price-Clkwvh 4.58 530
'o Cities Average Price4/kwh 4.48 4.78
k'* o Net Present Value of Cities
Average Costs 1995 to 2011
' $3.577B 3.809B
o NPV Savings $232 Million
`
w a
I
I
atY4
i
i
C09t of Power
i eTSWIMh Comparison
PRB Base Case
75 But Case (XIM 1
70 PRB Base Case
y 1 '
~ S
1. L 60
r • ..u...... u.. ..r....~. ..n
Y✓ S.. . .uu.. r. .r. r... f r i .......r .~.u u... u.....
> 5' id+~p ~i
50 i
r~
" 45 .............y .j.......... .j............ i...{ .
z . 1111 !
401 -j
1995 .1997 19"4 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Year
•...n.w.uwta,wWM.i..rNw~,L.w.w.w,.....--... _.~._-.r.__~___._._..
I
r%
fT
.w
p;wan y
too
fff
r ~
I
_ Cosjof Power
Fuel Switch Comparison
PRB High Cue
75
Base Cue GC1M
70 IN PRB High Case
65 ^ '
55 c. ...................b....... ..........3............ I...........I.....
. Fit
r~!- 45 f. 4 t ..i. S ...j i .t... '
a 1...
401
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 MI
Year
i
-
•.:.e. as
owl
I
'K/11M
PRB CASF I S1T
o Fuel Heat Value is 8500 BTU/Pound vs
4500 BTU/Pound - Therefore Less Fuel to
Handle and Grind
o Low Sulphur - No Scrubber Required
Saves $2 million/ r. of Limestone
o Low Ash Therefore Easier to Grind and
Less Boiler Wear and Maintenance
I n'r
o Lower Moisture Therefore Better Burning
Efficiency
a-':fir; f I
o No Electricity Needed for Draglines or
u Conveyor Belts •Gain 10-15% Energy Yd
~4r from Plant
x
i
'tart ~ 17
g a1 I
t
4klrl xy. ( 10
LAYUP GIBBONS CREEK AND
"POWER
Repower Base
l r
o Electricity Produced - kwh 4.0D 2M
1998
o Total Cities Energy - kwh 5.6 5 AB
` o Agency Net Price - Mwh 4.91 5.56
198
o Cities Average Price - Mwh 4.92 5.09
o Net Present Value of Cities
. Average Costs 1995 to 2011 $1692 $3.809
- o` NP V Savings $117 Billion
7 ,
'j
>ar.~j
r r
i
f
! I ._Cg&Lof Power 3
Fuel Switch Comparison
Layup dt Repmer
i 75 Baas Case GO.M
.~Ir
70 l Layup dt Rcpawer
W i. i .i. t
°
.60 i
e.......... z
55 ' . .
n! r I
ref *,Y~ a I 1
45 ' ;
1
40
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 tit ~
Year
~ _...,.......a......unwMU.f.Y9G/(RYJyaM.Y..YKG.Mwia.fs..u...
v
,
liY
I.AYL~ & REPQ~
FER ISSUES
o Install 2 - 220 mw Combustion Turbines
One at Garland's Plant i
~ i
- One at Bryan's Plant
` o Shut Down Gibbons
` - Annual Maint.Cost $9 Million
"el<~,', Retain Two Draglines and Conveyor. Belt
t
y s -
` Annual Leese Cost $7 Million
r
o Retain Plant, Lake and 20,000 acres of Land
,a.
.V .
!
r
i
r
12
MsfMlfrY'MYrw~.... r.. e...... ...1...)...+'tn~~.rSiJ.1~'4 M.f..!lwf'KTN.rl.a,i ♦YMf
(f
.o u.ar,
1
,
LAYUP GIBBONS CREEK AND
PURCHASE POWER
"
Purchase Base
tj 7 o Electricity Produced - kwh 2.3B 2.98
1996
x, o Total Cities Energy - kwh 596B 5AB
L
{ fi ' o Agency Net Price - M0 8.30 5.56
' o Cities Average Price - Mwh 5.68 5.56
3
f' r
o Net Present Value of Cities
Average Cost 1995 to 2011 $1978 $1809
L, - J
y ` o NPV Savings $169 MUM
t ~
,~rrt
Ass E
r
M P
•r.
,
I'
i 13
1
y4 .
7kS vi.,,:•,.+r«iuwr:.u.».M+,. vw«... e.,~rva.,,..w ..,,....n.. .
Apr r ,
SY
r
i P
f
C 40f Power
Fuel Switch Comparison
i JAyup & Purchase
75 i Bm Case GC1.M
70 Layup & Purchase
65 i.. + i i
000
n •f 55 t....... . y..
y..
45 .
t. .......i i
t i
40
ar 1945 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Year
r I .
I
i
.
- Mgt
r
}
Cost of Power
Fuel Switch Comparison
75 Base Cast CCI1M
Weir0o TMPATakemer
t
70
i PRB Base Case
E 65 - PRB Hish Case
60 ' ,......t,.......................
Layup & Repower
55 L yup & I'mchaso
. s.. i
4 i t. t . i...........:. .
1 r
45
i
l I I I -j I -
40
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Year X `
i. e. _..._._.._.....-...r..o.......a6rilL.w.c~ww+.1.~.wwa.•.,..._.__.._ w_ _
J
d fl
T ?A BOARD I.QQiriP4
o TWA Board Voted to Do a Seven Day .
Test Burn of PRB Coal in Late December j
,
Cost $500,000
r y
f
s
tt o TMPA Board Voted Not to Begin
r~ r r Engineering of Railroad and Boiler
f ` r Improvements.
o Next TWA Board Meeting is Second
Thursday in Januaru 1995
µ a~ r a
o Anticipate Need to Make Decision on
y Future Option
y Y I
4 1
Y r*
' . o Concern that TMPA's Full
y♦w ' ` Requirements Power Contract still
Limits Denton's Options
r 1d (`iyi'1 h:
a v, S`dya~,~i 14
9 Y
=rair
1
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
Back°ro~.i
In the mid 1970's the TMPA Member Cities found themselves in an environment of
rapidly increasing natural gas and fuel oil costs for power generation. In
addition both State and Federal legislation had been enacted, which limited and
ultimately would prohibit the use of natural gas as b boiler fuel. The
certification of utility service areas by the newly created Public Utility
Commission of Texas provided assurance of a captive customer base over the long
term.
These factors combined to allow large capital investments to be made to minimize
future fuel costs increases. Specifically, the objective of the Cities was to
decoupleI as much as possible, their future power production costs from variation
in natural gas and fuel oil pricing.
For these reasons, the decision was made to construct the Gibbons Creek Plant and
to fuel the Plant with mine mouth lignite. Use of this resource to supply a
mtiaority of the Cities' energy requirements would result in a controlled fuel
price, which would not be subject to the large variation being experienced in the
natural gas market. In addition, the cost of fuel from the captive mine would
increase at levels less than the rate of inflation. The use of Powder River
Basin (PRO) coal was considered, but it was believed that market forces would
cause PR8 to track natural gas and oil costs, due to the captive transports'ion 1
supply from the basin to Texas.
The original objectives have been achieved. Gibbons Creek fuel costs, from the
Gibbons Creek Lignite Mine (GCLM), have been almost totally unrelated to natural
gas and fuel oil prices. Escalation rates have been very moderate, in fact, the Creek
is l current
omparable costs variable expcst of eriened generation durig 1984, the first. of commercial operations
Issues 5tatemeDIL
The current environment in the electric utility industry, which faces the Agency
and its Member Cities, has changed dramatically from the mid 19701s. These
changes in the operating environment encompass a number of areas.
There is a greatly increased level of competition in the industry today. The
certainty of retaining wholesale loads due to control over transmission systems
no longer exists, due to the wheeling provisions of the National Energy Policy
Act of 1992. It is unclear at this time that the assurance of retention of
industrial
retail loads, particularly the larger r1a1 loads, will continue due to the
various proposals for retail wheeling which are being made throughout the
country.
Natural gas rites have not continued the increases which were experienced during
cost had Cities were
escalated p to $4.
the natural t gas f for of 250 the per l MMBtu. F By mid example, 190, this 1913 the
n 60. E
i
fin.
a.
wtx
Gas prices generally declined through the 1980's with prices of less than $2.00
per MMBtu being the nom from 1988 to the present. These reductions are the
result of several conditions. Demand for natural gas for power generation was
reduced as a result of utilities moving to other fuel sources in response to the
Federal and State legislation previously mentioned. A much larger impact was the
} result of various regulatory actions, most notably the FERC Ord,,r 636 which
declared all natural gas pipelines to be classified as common carriers. This
action allowed ultimate customers such as Power Generation to obtain natural gas
' from the lowest cost supplier and pa the pipeline only transportation costs.
This deregulation forced the natural gas industry as o whale, and pipeline
companies in particular, to substantially reduce their cost, and streamline their
operations to be able to survive in a competitive environment. i
I The repeal of the State and Federal legislation limiting the amount of natural
I gas as boiler fuel, resulted in imported fuel, such as Powder River Basin (PRB),
competing with natural gas for the power generation market. Both the mines in
the Powder River Bas,'n and the railroads, which transport the fuel from Wyoming
to the ultimate consumer, responded to this competitive pressure by reducing
their prices to retain the market share in the light of competition from natural
gas.
The low levels of gas prices, both current and projected, have resulted in
renewed technology development in the use of natural gas for power generation.
The current technology of combustion turbines utilizing higher firing
temperatures, combined with either existing or new steam turbines, are producing
combined cycle efficiencies with heat rates below 7,000 Btu/Kwh. the combination
of current levels of natural gas prices and the heat rates being achieved with
3 the advanced technology gas turbines, have resulted in gas fired options which
are more attractive than new solid fuel generation.
The Gibbons Creek Mine is currently in a position where continued operation will
require movement to an area further to the East, resulting in substantial capital
investments for infrastructure, conveyors, roads, sedimentation ponds, etc.
j These expenditures will result in increased fuel costs over the next several
years as well as making use of fuel other than GCLM uneconomical in the future
due to the amount of sunk cost in the East Move Mining Area.
The lignite from the Gibbons Creek Mine is of low quality and high ash and
moisture. It also has levels of sulfur which requires the operation of the wet
limestone scrubber to remove the SO, from the flue gas. The low fuel quality
-combined with the high abrasive qualities of the gas, result in operation,
maintenance, and renewal and replacement costs, which are higher than would be
required if a higher quality, lower sulfur fuel were being burned. As an j
example, current expenditures for limestone to supply this scrubber exceed $2
t million per year.
The Agency and the Member Cities have had the dubious luxury of operating with
} y I
i a fairly high level of excess gene-sting capacity over the past decade. However, i
load ggrowth has absorbed this :a. Current projections are that additional
capacity will be required by 199, to meet the needs of the current Members and
their wholesale customers It is also possible that construction of facilities
which meet the 1999 capacity requirement may be undertaken earlier to generate
1 2
1
4
i
I l
j
a savings in fuel costs. The operating cost of the advanced technology combined
cycle is sufficiently below the operating costs of the current Cities gas fired
units. This fuel savings could offset part or all of the capital cost of the new
Plant.
F Perhaps the greatest uncertainty and most pressing current issue facing the
Agency and the Member Cities relates to the continued supply to the City of
College Station. College Station's current contract expires December 31, 1995.
It is highly unlikely t.at a rate structure developed on the same basis as the
current contract and sup t same resources as the current contract
~r lied with ,
will be attractive to College Station in view of their other options, which are
made available by FFRC ordered transmission wheeling. Revenues from this sale
are currently paying a portion of the fixed costs of the !ember Cities and the
Agency. If cost reductions can be made which would at minimum offset the.lost
revenue from College Station or at best produce a cost structure which would be
j attractive for College Station to continua as a customer, the best interest of ;
the Cities could be served.
1
V f' " tK
9
1 3
r
~r
P r
Boom%
. i .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tab 1 Project Background
Tab 2 Scope of Services
Proirct organization Flow Chart
CQ1M Narrative/Executive Overview
-Tab 3 Study Analysis Approach and Scenario Description
Explanation of Pro Forma Line items
8a1 Scenarios with Assumptions
Pro forma& and Cost Curves for each Scenario
z Fuel Cost Forecast Tables
e r
r~r Tab 4 Malysis/Recommendations
3 Net Present Value Summary Bar Chart
JA
summary Cost Curve
r,
Tab 5 Proposed Project Schedule
.4
1 }
r At
I
i
r,, 'r" a r 111
, • ~d 1 0.s,;.,
la.
r
e ~
j
TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
k} elf r f}
r }
Qyf yJ, ~yJ,',
INTERIM REPORT
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
r
'
November 9, 1994
'I
ref ~
r y
tti•~r,~ ~
STy4f Sir .,~1
wwl I
}QTY l ,
~~yyQ ,emM1u~
row
1 { ~j•. r
1 11~ ^ I `L .
N r
~~~11yy tl 1 f~ f r~i~
4 ~
r~ 4 a ! TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
l
~ 1~ afs L
'any INTERIM REPORT
{
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
h$$
t 4' November 9, 1994 i 4.
'e
as 1.
r.
a !
~I
p.
r.15 ~ ~y`~yy .,J,il r
!4 Y.aw f`
MO'
MW1
~I
1
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
Scope of Services:
In view of the changing internal and external environment in the power supply
industry and the need to identify and implement additional capacity requirements
prior to 1999, at their May 19th meeting the Agency Board of Directors retained
the consulting engineering firm of Burns 6 McDonnell to provide an aiialysis of
power supply options for the Agency and its Member Cities. The major analysis
to be studied is the continued viability of fueling Gibbons Creek from the
Gibbons Creek Lignite Mine as opposed to i1orting fuel from other ■iness most
likely the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. The second issue to be studied Is the
viability of continuing to operate the Gibbons Creek Plant as opposed to laying
it up in extended storage and replacing its capacity and generation through the
use of advanced technology gas turbines, combined with existing steam turbine
capacity at the Member Cities. The third issue to be addressed Is the optimum
choice for future cappacity to be integrated into the system which is chosen as ij
best in Items l and 2 above.
During the period of 1988 through 1993, several studies were made and test burns
conducted using a blend of fuel from the Gibbons Creek Mine with higher quality
lignite and low sulfur coal from the powder River Basin. These studies reached {
the conclusion' that a blend of fuel' front two sources would not be more
economically attractive than a burn of either 1004 imported fuel or look burn of
Gibbons Creek Lignite. The reason for this conclusion is that any blend would R
have to support spate level, if not'all, of the fixed costs that would result from
burning 1004 of that fuel. As a result, any blend would have higher levels of
fixed cost for both Imported fuel and fuel from the Gibbons Creek Mine, which
would make the blend economically unattractive. For this reason this study
addresses only 1004 GCLM and 1004 PAS.
,I
f '
r,
a.Lnt ' F Y r"• ~t b44 c S ay i t F 2 : 1 k s eimd v ~~B'ra ,vli#''
(Analysis
~ WK
1 at Flaw Chart
u, a
` Y'4r A~ of ~y SGT F'.3 a r
B
,n e Q n ~,z n
r
Mfr uf, a t:
L I; or f
7 77:
r ~ 7 rrinTr a < F
W
t 'If k i t..{{,:6d~k 11 il Cost
f r
` City Studies Xsc tion
4~ (gums McGomdll LJR
(W*, pit
R k ~,tt'~TryA! ~ r
i ruru s i Musu
i~? r t' ° 11 Fat 100= Gaµ F" "41
rYen FR V;,~y~'~~r •n'~~ ,fir. 1
I 1 r I I j f . ~ r i :'I x
Y i F k~'u (/►~r OR
h' r u T r i
AiL
i rRt rr ✓ r ,
n.' I x r r I r {R<+ g~ I r' i i ~ r I
.rte r B ' fi ~H b
KIWI
t • ~Tl.Tnr 5 y ~?r r v ~'QsK d' ~~y (Week A4 ~~YL r{
i T { :1{t f} R r ~r4 g; r
r.
~:i r •k Ay ~~,fwU ~ IY:w~4~ p~~.ai~C ^ f0
r
NJ
41~
R
COAL QUALITY IMPACT MODEL
(CQIN)
I Backgro und Information
The CQIM is a PC based computer performances ndioperating costs.ains unit
y The nodal cont
varying coal qualit on power r p P P
cm model was developed for the Gibbons Creek Station.
lt and dihistoric l lp i t! cg in Or~nnce 4
specific information which economic cr iteria; an
ratings, and performance; loads, net ratan , etc.). The Electric
(heat rates, auxiliary gg ~,p 1 by the lanntng Unit of Black Veatch
model a to ddedetermined llwas {
EPtli 96 t, or construct was
power Research institute
performance and cost based on var atlons in coal quality. The original
developed around data supplied by TMPA.
In running the model, rogras predictions are carefully revieweid 1lreperiting
p Drier, boner
through a predicted/observed data performance comparison. nt s, biperformanc er
e andaneteplantcheat rate) were verified auxf4 ~r p performance
steam
&S burn ' efficiency g i on d predictions for syste~" suian as acoal nd pr ecipitator }ar reereviewed: forfring accuracy and
generator, ash handling,ared to validation values wherever possible.
reasonableness, and comp $IS was
The CQIN unit file constructed for Gdevc o y
ped tfor thetGibbons site., Engineering
based on a pprevious CQIM
additional data suPPIiirformance testae and interviews with plant personnel were
1
elml uti l i ie rasa data resources.
Tl
1 ♦ f♦F)
I F 11 r'I ~I` F
nY +
1`
2 -7
k h ..f~~~ F ~~~t~r`s;~r•'R"f~.+~ <"~~~~~~~sTx3r'rMil~'~
M6W
fri } T~+ ~~t * ~ v k 2
3 ~ ^ R7
Powder River Basin
.~~V
Cabello Rojo
4J56 QAQ~
2 r ra' 273 `S
r3 w r 3 r `
iJ4 . 52 i t ~ i i f flf
i `
p p ~ d y
ftwers MW
a y 77 p~
Plant ';.n.`
► ~ Heat 13~1><i6 rf`l
i
Fuel YWY RAM
~M y 1" Y 1 1
qq
~+~+!+++~+1Ma s6' yam" a~ n r C,'
f~fsu~'t i ywld q ~
'II X t • f'~ X11 Y T~n~
I
I
i
I
I
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
Analysis ADaroach and Scenario Description:
Burns 5 McDonnell has completed analysis of four scenarios relating to the fuel
supply and two additional scenarios to study the potential lay up and extended
storage of the Gibbons Creek Plant. With regard to the lay up scenarios, one
scenario looked at re powering of selected City units as replacement power for
Gibbons Creek generation. The other scenario examined the purchase of power to r
place Gibbons Creek gen ration. This section of the report describes each of
re # scenarios studied.
" The base scenario (scenario 1) for this study is the operation continuing in the l
present mode of fueling the plant with Gibbons Creek lignite with mining being
provided by a contractor (NMC). A summary of the analysis is presented in a pro
forma format as Table 1. Behind this table is a detailed narrative of the pro
formes on a line item basis. Since each scenario presented is in the same
format, this narrative can apply to each scenario.
Scenario 2 is based on the Stone 3 Webster study which indicated that
consideration should be given to the Agency taking over- the operation of the Mine
and continuing the operation using Agency employees. The costs of this operation
were projected by Paul Weir Company with the results being set forth in Table 2. }
The major differences in this case and the base case are a reductions in the J
r.- amount of fuel costs due to TMPA operation of the Mine and a partially offsetting
increase in fuel costs due to the buy out of NMC equipment as per the terms o
the contract. For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that these costs
would be funded through sales of bonds with the debt service being spread over
a 13-year time period. The balance of the calculation on this case is
essentially the same as the base case.
The third scenario studied, assumed the use of Powder River Basin fuel for the
t x,' total fuel Supply of the plant. Costs for this operation are set forth in Table
r~ 3. Costs of fuel and transportation were estimated by SO Energy, a consulting
firm which specializes in fuel cost forecasting. Significant changes in the
results of this case from the base case are substantial reduction in waste
disposal, due to the quantity of ash being produced and elimination of the
I'r:' scrubber additive expense. The Agency has been advised by its environmental
legal consultants that, under the terms of the Gibbons Creek permit, continued
o oration of the scrubber will not be necessary when burning low sulfur PRB coal .
= I The balance of plant ON is shown at a reduced level, with the amount of the
t~ p
fr; reduction being as calculated by the Coal Quality Impact Model. It should be
g ? noted that the leverage lease on both the drayline and conveyor continues in its
full amount through the year 2001 with an additional $3 million expense in 2008
F,r rl^ for disassembling and preparing the equipment for shipment, as required under the
terms of the lease. A minor amount of revenue is shown from the sale of SO
emissions since the CQIM results indicated that less SO will The emitted withouf
the scrubber operation on PRB fuel than would be emitt d with full utilization
of the scrubber while burning GCLM fuel. The amount of Gibbons Creek energy
5~, " 6. available to the Cities is predicted by CQIM to increase by approximately 104.
It should be noted that this increase results only from reductions in station
O Q^V
F~ 3 . 1
fi 1 Fr_ 1 i
1
"
~r >
siltil
I
.►ZiAW
i
service and in the amount of energy which is supplied to the Hine to operate the
draglines and conve;rors. In all cases, it is assumed that the maximum gross
capability of the plant is 437 megawatts. Net generation on GCLM is 405
the Mine. megawatts,
currently PRB is to proected to be
including, 5 however, megawatts hich eneration on
While these capacities are used for study purposes, the Agency staff believes
that the test inc ease utilizing as g muwill result in a ch as an additional e 5kcapacity and energy with
the level of
On the City expenses side, this case shows reduction in the fuel and purchased
power costs due to more energy being supplied by the lower incremental costs
Gibbons Creek energy. The construction cash flows utilize all of the
construction funds currently available, as discussed above, to fund the cost of
the unloadit) facilities and boiler modifications. The capital costs from rates
in the renewal and replacement category have been levelized to wre accurately
reflect their impact. It should be noted that these capital cost estimates
include expenditures for boiler and fuel handling modifications which future
testing may prove to be unnecessary.
'he fourth scenario in the fuel switch analysis is shown on Table 4. This option
is identical to the PRB case except it projects the high PRO fuel cost as a.
L sensitivity analysis. For the purposes of this case, the JD Energy high coal 1
j cost was combined with the current transportation quotes provided to the Agency
by the Burlington-Northern Railroad as a probable maximum fual cost for PRB fuel.
Future Ooeration of Gi kUS. Creek:
Scenario five assumes that the entire Gibbons Creek plant would be placed in long
term storage at the end of fiscal year 1996, Both capacity and energy to replace I
Gibbons Creek output would be net by the repowering of Garland's Olinger 3 and
Bryan's Dansby 1 units. This repowering would consist of advanced technology gas j to su
exis steamnturbine at t se locations. TheeAayency costslwhi h woulpd c ntinue would
support the areas of transmission operation, dragline and conveyor lease, debt
service, both existing and as required to fund construction of the new facilities
at Olinger and Dansby and the continued cost of operating the Agency and
maintaining the plant In a condition where it could be returned to service at
some future date. For purposes of this analysis, the Agency A&G and plant
maintenance costs were estimated at approximately $9 million, escalating at 1.6%
per ear. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 5, which is in a
siwilar format to the other tables.
Scenario six closely resembles the fifth study in the fact that the entire
Gibbons Creek plant would be placed in long term storage at the end of fiscal
gar 1995. Both capacity and energy to replace Gibbons Creek output would be met
purchasing replacement power. Destec responded to the Agency's recent Request
for Proposals with an offer to sell up to 750 MN at quoted capacity prices. Fuel
would be indexed to the Houston SMp Channel spot price for naturil gas, as
RIC A purchase of 405 MW from Destec was
prices report
quoted in theppublication Inside wweerelused lace Gions with the other.c cases. prices
3 2
I
s
t.+iW r:xa~p
) r. for the l of h
for any Lere in excess hoe refive earso SO
sults of this analysiseis presentedgin Tablee6study
period was assumed. i
~ i
i I
~y
v ~ 1
I
f
. 37
r r I fty.:
l
I E
4
01
I i
rf i.r I'
3.3
li . ,.flo-v',.. ~...+'r♦ha's ror+,i [d1.~4..Mw
~kHXIV 'k
I
4A.M
II
' I
1
POWER SUPPLY ANALYSIS
ern fnrai line Item Descriptions
Generation: This section indicates the energy required to meet TMPA obligations
and the various sources which supply this energy.
a
Agency Expenses* This section breaks expenses into categories with Fuel Costs
being the costs associated with fuel procurement from the nine. Production 08M
costs are the costs of operating and maintaining tce power plant. Transmission
is the wheeling costs for delivering energy to the Cities as well as the cost of
operating and maintaining the Agency's portion of the transmission system.
f` Administrative and General. Expenses cover the administrative cost of the Agency.
li` 1
Debt Service is the principal and interest on the TMPA debt. Coverage Payment j
is the payment made to the Cities from the excess revenues collected to provide
for that service coverage. Renewals and ReplacMntt are the costs of those
capital. projects which must be collected from the rates.
Agency Revenue: The lines marked Contract Deraan,Q and Energy are the revenues {
received from the Cities for the sale of power. Interest is income received from
interest an the TMPA investments. Other Revenue is revenue from sale of such
things as sale of 'he SOz allowances.
City Exaenset ThllCity Expense category contains the Contract Demand and Enemy E
as payments to th4 Agency for power. The Fuel And Purchase line includes the
cost of gas for City generation and purchases from Brazos Electric Co-op. QSh J
ta. PMduction is expenses xhich include debt service on the Cities' generation
plants.
d Mi.,cellaneous City Revenue: This section includes the Coverage Pavnent, which
is the amount returned to the Cities by the Agency. Off Svgto Enerav is the
revenue received from sales from both energy and capacity to Brazos Electric Co-
op.
3-4
i
~w
1
WWI
This is the difference between the cities' revenue and
expenses.
t This is a calculated vaihte ;nd represents pay'ents to
~i r~rt of E~~rav•
the Cities less the Coverage pay*ent divided by the Gibbons Creek
,t
y
^ _ I the Agency b
Net Energy.
4z y } This is a calculated value of the Cities' net
Cir'~ Aver a~~ne+ few C.~tV
re energy Energy
the entiy requirement of the Cities.
1 F cost divided by
J.•
1
N
99 , I.
4
W~I
{~~k S Sr ~
M i
e
c , 'ynk f
ayr" p ~ ra.i R r go a a6:' ,~<x*ik. E731,A ~ ~~~t+~ ,~y`{rj~,r.P~t Y ySf' V~n ~(~~~w d~*; Q ~ .,I S xf ! Vo f u r
k11SS1C)n
yLY ~ ~ ~L4~& 2 ~ f l! d p
f( n I 'A
i Ml~l1r PiC L
A
' ~ljp t A~~5C3'
x
e rAryyiP
`f :from _ previous draft
itd ro~,w a
on of scenarios
f 4.}" a} ri3 ~e
Discussion of scenario proformas
~ Vp fir. ^p
Input assumptions
Cost development
Results
iA , u➢ f i ~ s 4N. i @ Y~ a ~u di 2~.i~0 j
' t ` x' hf r t y :t R y : ~ r 1 x` a ~ aS 'r+Hy i~
r ~ x x 'y r~ d g e y a y ~bf
-e p y ~ F c ~ S y 53 u 4; ~ y, i t~F
ri
t A t. t r ~ r v z' „ ~r y r 34,> ~}rk t¢ 5,~9yr, s yg>~f„''
1 h ~Z a t''T1 a G 4 f Y~.r 11fi'YR ~.~r'M ~Y&k N )93"' S
! ~ x # A dA " 01 q ~ gA fQ y ,5 b J'~9 H J'yt~> >a9~ ~ ~i
v ~v w~ a Sf~ 7t gzy wyoy,pY y W' as' '
~l N'yf ~ h R~✓S~f9 ~b ~ tb ~{S rt. w
y,~...._.._: ..~„~.o....w...w..as.r:.n...,m-...w..~r.an.«.ww... _....__._.,~w:v~u.r~;lS41rR~'.~""'^..__.....
r
w.
<mr
Fla
ar
Ltw OXI
~ s
y^ay urc PKa' 4PS~ ~ w~ r t' f S r~ ~ y ~fi
,sx f ~
pA, C4 Iyfy r tr 4 f u ~
11~ vu Draft
a s ~ '~~Jry~. .ef~IJ ls, 7,i Y„~ xiJ Vo 'r r
arp ~'ncy expenses for
f bY'11 onOJiyear - B&Mc missed
orrected.
expenses in layup were revised to
w include TMPA's estimate for A&G and
'B&Mc estimate for plant maintenamae ;
cost. Will discuss later under.:: the
{ $ C ' t yt s g'7 u~ r ifs q3~~x
scenario:
IS' ns a Y2 k y a ~.~a
3JJi 0 xJ 5 rs y
■ S02 EmiC
t:x `w a 7-R k r f s
~ r r ~ b.'' iJ ~ ~ sx" r ; s~~~i~' Y~ ~Yxoy a~Fk W.ift. '
v
r
~nclude~
rtY~ Jdf ~t 5'.n r ~s:~gJk~J~7~ry3Akt~r,~ M~S ~"s i > rsE YYii~'~ ~J~'I'~~i
Y ~d- rti~~:.1 X ~YJ 1 •'SN~~I !K ~ ry
➢,7 BxJgb~ r rp~ ~,~y~NN~.xa .7Q.` ~/~,~p"y,
I
i,
h
aAr1a-O-
e
.
` 'revious Draft
m X47
~FW rovenue based on most
information from Cities on
j ~k¢ A"r~pQduation costs and parameters.
Pir~ofo mas presented in standard TMPA
layout.
■ Study period to 2011 to match the
production cost model capabi~itles. and
ax {
reduce the assumto . oh►°~ E
~i~~'~i
2011. More ca asoar*1 tt
rr.-
j
I
I
I
r ln1i
11
r.:
o+a
r
-J W
tr Y~ sF ' y'Ai~ a;p:;? ` k( kb y' 5" ~ t Ah' 1 zed
b 1 r S ~ 1
q ~ 7
S
texas 'Lignite with Scrubber
K ~rat~on of mine case
x y ~~I f r
ERGO Case (TMPA takeover) - Texas
W ~T i I p.'Jti° C
Lignite with Scrubber
m Fuel Switch to Powder* River Basin Goal
Option 1 PRB coal; Scrubb,e Nevi I
Rotary Car humped
t1 ~ F~ ~ n 3 ~j r l r a a Y ~i: Jt i
w' 4 1 1 f Ft+Y ta'~~~ i. ' H'
? ' ~ t 4 r >r C^ yr~"3§~ `et ~ k i a u w s ~'s'ce I
1
i
h
~ r ~ ~~~A4` 3'f ~~9~Y xP ~K,s~~~p~fs R tr Svy e
y~. r t
!'aRPo a~R ~KE~ iRn~} ~
r x~~E s's x a.
Est +case
` ti~`PRB coal - No Scrubber - New'
3t ~ If r v e
' t.ay Car +umper (High Fuel Cost
aye
W xb,,. :Scenario)
r:, s
x y ,j # Layup of Gibbons Creek , Repo Repower Olinger 3 andaby h?
Gibbons Creek r Y L:r r4W
ya , ~3s} x ; P r A
r H is x'~3, r', d1 s 7 'i
S-P
■ Layul.-,) ofibbos'
bi~
{ t rl~it sfh~Fw s r AS~~~M~~r~~.~&~ ~d."
1 ~ 3 s.y~rr~.~~
y y! y Y"4 ~ x, ~ pp~ S x,
i
~ I
..~i ~:.:.4.1'.rrJ.w✓...Mdr ~a.Y.tii.Nlrl.iyR..~.M^4ilit✓IwJY~xLR~.Aw
F
.r
'f gar
` Dario
YA
f: f i S Y~~ I
R
d~s the ever V
PA load obligations
• wpenses'
C
3Te, ` r1i~ost
s>
Costs associated with fuel procurement
;tj
from mine
Production. O&M
Operation and Out@n e
Gibbous Crep "T'g."
{ L Ls
y: +
01
E^~9 v" et.. a' ,
^7 ~°a `~~t'r etl M~~ i7f 501 3 r s pul.
I-
I sy
Jw~
,r
p
ZI~~~i t'~!r~~.f ~ dy v
h i
a F ~ Mt )3(
zce kaa N act s i
i
~s the energy
e'MI~A load obligations
Ades
Fit
x.
Costs associated with fuel procurement
from mine
'Xi
Production.. O&M
Operation 444 M •t A yep
1a ~tp P~r r y `
G~bbo~s Car~e~~,~+~~'~~ ~ ~a ~r ~,3~~Y~~~~,~sp~~>~~"~~~~~•}
- ..F ~ w n r 3 r t r ~ a 7?5 xr Ar ,k Gl ~'v%
-;rT air r. 3ry ,¢Z`iN urfW~" '~'r ~ C~.x
~ ' ~ ~ Div c v ~ ✓a] aY ~ ~`A,~'~ ~ K° v4k v ~aC$~7'~~7 ~ N xk .
C M1 b.r yNb ~ 11 E j~ Y A ~~',Y r~y$z;,~`M
f~r Jx v 4 1 zr~ ~r~~My ~ 3 a~~ ~ yr ~ ~ V S
t ~YY P }xr: 9' k rr ay
r. .M
A., l
OPT
I
a n iry ly A A t _x ~ xe'v~ I '
' `"e ~ v ~ 5Tn d fir': f e z P'i: f a y
of Y~ ya ,gRe~N I Iq".Y,r,~ v c v. v
➢ a i ~y'w%zfpz $a 4 ~a@ '4 aRNS Ni
z 3 Y'~ e a 9T
Gont.~
k ~ ~ 4 Fe
x
4k Z'
~ a° iifz S M s I 1 G
hings as sale of S02
f
.A,°i~:~ontrct~Demand
Demand payments to TMPA
i
Energy
• Energy payments, to ThIPA
r r "
c
j - Fuel Purchase
• Cost oho ~k►
{ {xr 3,. e fr'ti474u,„Af ?!tav 4, .'.i f8 eOF.3
~7 ~w st ><.t 4~~:`i' ;f~ t+r d ! ,Pf,N' i
,
Y
LLL
k ti x'
21
t -
I~
Fit
y F;
~ ~r ~~(~.es,~r ~(",°r ~..s5 G Ti' ° n{ bk.r'+ a ~e ~r) t } 'I
'n, a t, si, f to I I
r 0
C1 Pu#
.tt~ c
I FN" 2,, Y y `tS1 V~ t, , y ; I
" d l
k
° Pi fir
r' ~ y a,~ "fie ~ G ~'~k ~y F .
~sts of 'delivering energy to
I~xs ~Ras'nd`ransmission O&M z
W ki rE4~ ' r,tJ ,t Adnli • & `Gen.
'
r 1
,Adminstrative costs to the Agency
■ Debt Service
Costs of Principal and Interes the r
t x + ~
+ ~z,, + ~k x r k~s r~~EFy" E
TMPA debt
i ~ ~ k } t 3r y 16•f I
i ° f 7F k4 k a °+.y~+'0 Sy r ~P~'
.Coverage Pa
! M S M
H e'~lrrY k 1~1~`~
~ s.
y
(co
A46 x> 4 C.i~ yid f j
3'r N '4R A~{Wu °z 8 „C + p) k e h a3
t r.1G1 i dJ .6
~of .Cities' Generation Plant
eYenue ,
frG o 7.y~~~~4 f ~
w r ks Rey Payment
`Off=5ystem Energy
' . • Sales of energy to Brazos
Other Revenue
*Sale of Capacity to Brazos::
r+n 1 nN K r z'1 ~ a~ ~,n c ~ n ~ ,r ) rD"v
■ City Net Cost Y
D~ffe'elee yob ~Cty.ey '
a Sr ; rkq'~ 3 Asu ~~r yf #rr ~ ry~~°'~ "`,~'a
! A Y A
PT - -
Mon
R aI
l
~ x~ SrN'.e~~n Rk:. A<r ~`3'.+ -.3E>wG
a s i kMw 7Gy a ~ Y > b i~p' { G ,HC
i
_ ~5 x r-' ia.7 ,r v i, z c
a ,y"rti ~ ~ . e x], ~~5,0#'? a ~ w I aJ re s F
1
N Inc
Y Q1
petal Projects that must be
h +~~A ~rrom 'rates
wY ~ c ` Kovenue
W n9o;,~q
Contract Demand
;R remand charges received from Cxtles
- Energy
f rlA ~ L#
• Energy charges reiYet r '
- Interest 1 9 n '1XttrYe axArnex 7Y°`1 1
y YYt~ P J j K K~ K~ ~ ~ -
G s kG c r s~~p.
i.
}
I
,
r l
aMif F
14
i r,X b ~ ::w M 4 x r C
AA,
an iF!?~+~~ £ t~ " e >
N
nts minus the Coverage Pmt,
fitayr~ne
r >
r ds ivided b the Gibbons Creek net w
r
£
A11 City Energy
rxr
5
t, isaji:
uevlc
• City expenses minus rove
i° ° y t i }j°r b e H'~t2 K e a R°
energy to cltle1
i y fl ~ 4 rY .~'N1 L
, 3'r:( K j£>Pf r? '~rl~e?:. v£vaHb. .rs
t $ ~ 's. ~ rX~n ,`.}E r ~ > (diq➢G.°'r ~ °k3 ~ 4 '~H > :~y ~`r". '
` i uhf gy'~'r~ 7Ns '?~)f'`~aN x;N
j
t
fir.
.qty
I
+ i o y ix L ~ i~ ~yt••~ ~ o41%r<~~~`F ~..K`O Sa~.•.
. s ,
arto
y
' -1 erg ;
yJ y
pg , M A'+i
w , 5~~,~~~~~~ , ents minus the Coverage Pmt.
0 WE
r a
4k a r ~lvided 'by the Gibbons Creek net eneargy
x
q Q "fps - ;r
All City Energy
zn
lye 3, t#
vE '
• City expenses minus revers vo vi ed4 kx yY
~ + ei i ~ 1 +1 .bye °8+ r of F ~+"_~LO i~ + a3t v
to clties
• energy to clitie
O;i 1~ j T ~ tK is ar ill 4~>i'~k~ a4~ 5.4x'HY+1. ~3' Y;
~ y v-1 n .~lv ,
".4 ; d er F. y x ;
' x a a iT i~.~ G
i ~
i
r. :
WIN
I`
1
ws~
r
i
,e x ~y "s n°i" r tF0, }a k r r }w k r yY } y. R
4 P
10
Y Y fu t
wne
Y~~p Y i. ~ 5 IN
Case
ease
i. ~ used an Weir & Co 'projections
51
t r
M a yg y : cQSts
i
on Caine operaton
le Takeover costs in fuel costs t : t FM,
;t
Mil
Y
v a
N' Y
-Prod. - Same as Base i ,
O&M
INS L
. , Renew •andtelace Sy ub CiY~ ni Fd E % iiq eE
k i k Ay 3 x E cat b'4y'nfi~ y
r ,W I' I
r awN r i~ y, 9A b ro ^'d
t Ea
5~1 vt Ay ,+'yEJ
~Y yt ~ _ ~yAF y~1tt 2~ v~
p 6v a t ! r......
y 56 l ~,Ry s~
~ ~ 'N Jt~A53t` r ` 3~W~~Ari r
y ~t ! ~ J ty,~iJ f ' y ~~~(~~YV' Az
t ~ ~ or q 8~>,~3~Nj~ ~tir~f yA x{+~t 'Y
y 5
k
,tn
, rK& Up
~iomr#
.,enario
Gibbons Creek
to fewer auxiliary and
i W
Oads, and increase
W d unit
performance on PRB,,Net Ou mit
* 1 0
bb ns Creek increasedi ~i n $rp
cities generation 'and ftio
decrease, dup~,161.~
Pz~, "A ~ 4p,~
~:-":MpO
r: .
"low
FIN ~
r`.
y~ 1 Z
~ i
r cF Aft;, a& fXt
• r
c. te nano ' (cant.)
~~ry yy A
ay
X >i
t z ° QOM analysis
w
Air C ~ ~ Yry`
'~'►i". no Scrubber operation
I y ~t kA ✓'a~ A Y e bN ,
."¢'="xsrty';,.R:educed waste handling
°Power pulverizers, etc. to. maintain
k ~r
• includes the O&M for the cull unkadill
i^ "TW~~j ~ bA le ~ en ~ ~r ~ttlf~' Yid }~.~~d',C
• Certain Mine costs
PP 1A//►►
Renew & P lace Y: f~ r t aVa A t Nt t b s v q> -y Aid r~ r t .Ny K'lt+:
A A A~ t. WW p
gt .Yi a ~0 <A~i w^§Ti Mf~8. ~3
Madif~~~ by e~i st'e~ A~l el ~ ~ ~t p ~~i
.u t K, b 7 A P °w r 4~C!r k3
~uY JJi!,~oa~
c AH o r 1 -a eP r4~r S x.
it P0.
i
i
'sw
1
I
1
p .gRy.C b N `.~~y{ ra c'4.yy 9 'I r.: xC 5ae~
d r4na ~cont )
z
` 1 ERA ~t i !
r
' ~ .y i a 4'x"'1 r~ ' ° xF e • ~ - :
w' &34 ' 4 fro;
for the rail, rotary
Y ' QF
t,
Olen. reduced due to lower
m
W ~xK~a ~,p,~r,~ ` • i
ar,Nufred ~supportservices
k,
C1tr4Revenue and Expenses
1 I
• r` x' x
Change due to increased net OPOT& t'sQ? f
v r 3: ~ r ~ ~ V, v e
k
Gibbons Crec
■ Fuel tra.AspoMO y r T S
~e t Gq • ~Ih.v is yr Y k °r" FLz Z a si.
t y~.E 4~ IN'!1~ a'E 5 PM FS ~ , k.
by $Q.50 ge;r~:
y
a, .I
U1~~o1.
4
Imo,.
G t
I a~ W,~~ .i rr str'k 'rtla st$'. T~Sa}~. a
£ ~ ~e r (Gant.)
crate plus 300 btu per kWh
,v
~ltah in 1996
W ~ rfi. 7P,~F w
median 3 year contract "real" FRBpst ,
Al ~xK tl r k , 1
,.wt4f~ projection from J.D. Energy, 3
t [ 1 F F
M
• 1us the real trans ortation cost
escalation at 4.5% to the y ~'esete' I a ;k
LI~~ nM^
• plus the cost o te'r +al ~
2008 t i ra a ary~`y~~'~ t YiWd yia
s .r 1f , ary " afr P. ye
i • - R
14
3~,y7V fo~iY~~
pp7,~ rt ppr.M k ~yW i }4 Mqp~"., ~f,fpp f'= Ma.~I Y
'YYC, Ili
r'
y
, . , - ..,.....-...w. a.,. ~ rv r,f.. ~sai,r-..K~Y,I..T a:~•~.:6aww.w.ra..W r.e4rw~4+aat1W r£.Iw'~o,l.rr~.~....~.................__
T
i.
1
r-~
r~ u
~F ' w ~3 x t }S~ i Cenano
- 1 r S~ ~;P h f
N
recast by J.D. Energy for "real"
r
GDI. Costs !
ab a r x 'i
y qqs ~ creased the real cost of transport0up :x
5~` f the median case from J.D. Enemy b~ $2`.~~ ~
r
1 1 NY_
e
per ton
Escalated forecast of "~c'~~ ds#~ !
s~r
t4 ale reSpCtl~f~ ' .
✓+.1 Fr `k ~ w ~ i d Fvxu~-q ~y Y'l yk5'69~x'~
i
i
r
p-
RO
(
N '
{yam'
pM base
~6rn ~y~r,a ~9.~'t, ~ i t} ~ X' j=k i ~rf ` ; •
a plion Scenario
rr
I Y ~ i n i~ < 3
Mothballed i
x~Mrfb ln,e.3 .Repowered with combustion
. ' rri't l rt Yr~ d urbines f
1
Dansby 1 Repowered with co 410
4 4 turbines
¢xl ; ; 4 ~
- 424 M W net average r caps d
a iA t° I f ti ,j$sa r r~ 1 N 'l~°'+t~ 1 r L ~Y s',l
• Generation ~ { r T r ~ $ b,} r 4tr ~~~q~+'e ~'~e v ~4 `~,P,SY~'s
- 0. for -Gl f"Wa rx ix~
~+p~;l•r~ ' 7+3r ¢ ~ fS` " y ~ fa~fd ~ ~fr~•r~ 4a
t K~~ ^F',y t ,.3` f 1 to 1X. J`Ya'a t ~ ~ y'W'd`' s~~;. ~
-
&
I m
a
I f Y~ q r I
OVA
ii.
.r4 LAAfw4ll.
1
.....,.._.....r..~~..we+..rVs0ew.51Y'WnY'WT6AYisLYL~aY~Y'w`n'MI~/W6LwlW~~aqu+w .
- - - - - - - - - - - -
ro F
C
Y
a 1"
+x La u ease
~ e 3 rP
°
a° scenario (cont.)
s ~r x i 1
for repowered units and cost of
z w
~ t ~~M b~~ r♦~L, ~9 ~u ~.Eh ~K I r - A
- GI ~ aierp~ ~ ~ ~ t
»i. `~1ra e ° lease
MM B&Mc estimate o main ena
4 }F~ ° 1 ..'.Pro(. O&M w i
for mothballed plant
! - Transmission - need to de~rex ;~r~r r xY;~a
YA Ly L 4 Strn ,
repowered plants Y y r L , yL w;,'
v ° di A v 1 i n i p aka v'x 33 b i`+G
+ K xi 7' L u~ rl'"w ~s M,~S'
* Impact Q11', C ` y R
f on yM~
r
I w 0
i
+ ' ,r~~,r" " s 3 < x'
.1
,
~c~f~ : e t; ~ st4k v1i
~ikt J d n~Cs~
Al
~Y F~ R s, ~ p x s.
z~~ LiCr 9u w r , t:~ _yp4 T r 1,~ f
.R
6T CCn,,'loCont.)
ff
I It
reduced to estimate from t
bf .office staff and B&Mc estimate . .
s',y;, ;`of pant staff
yy~ QNfk, r i ; s f
:°Debt Service, Coverage Pmt increased~y n~e
capital cost of rep ring
`f
x a~'✓
A
Renew & Replace
f' s s ~r 4 t'7~ s y 3~ ~ t
~ A A m °o1R j 9i*' J Cyr w x R 3 r~{.
i
F
f '
r
itI
1
k
1, f i t ry k b~ l{ yi ri i
Ir
tY Y f q
, 4~w i~II M < F` F u .
Case
r I s peon Scenario
i ■/'yII
s i
~a,"~~~6P of Destec purchased for
replacement of Gibbons Creek in 19'~
Wqv° Full forecast is J.D. Energy's gay' fat`s*`° F'
k
' 4 ~ Mir, 5 ~ r
' ~ ~ 5 \ ' ' t r " w F%+n 1t ~ X ) k:y 0 E ,e ~ F ~
q f~ p ''~z ~ ~~a #wd`.k a>e`t'w9 j
a a t fts ~ 17 ~ 1 y 511 rirdY' ~ ~F~i"^r K51rE .~"(~k
i
""""3kkk t, ~
a eyy 1
k
I
I'
ii
r
i
i
e
Sol
vwn-
r~
~ E >,e
~y 3 T 4' i ~
a7u i~ ! kdo P s(w~p
P i~
a S e
Scenario (cont.)
0 ain
w~.
y,yf ' b
1 H~ T
F x k ~~~111 y~
4. wf y '
f nh kK t reflects the increase in the
Nf 4HI
77
r_:Yf vyR f
E! ~j ,fle
W p energy fauna Destec
Agency Expenses
Production O&M - modified o
on,,
reduction in .Agency go erat s ,
. , estinaate~ of:li k+o~~ r'
~iy~ ♦ aiy7 A f ~
• ~ a r`~e i fT'ro /Nc
Debt Servacg
Tr
A^`
cast / oo-~f z f t $ } i
...n: ♦r~ .~w.r..n♦ :.V i~rti:lw~WCFIY14h.Y~'MiY~.~~'.
~A1<
I
TCAAS YUV.,CIPAL POV&R AGENCY ^ ~1 m 046 1Ilam I
S_OCL-SASE GAS Pmowm4 subm 6 of Rlwwm wd ExWom 6W D61/ IL IOm
P604 I
Im 196 IN7 ,19" 1111 1000 2001 2002 2003 2001 2005 Z" 2001 2007 2014 7010 2011
~ ~3ENERATION (MYN1)
AGENCY
Obb"C04 3,121,134 2,127,527 2,712,307 lin7,107 t727,m 2.731,102 3.737"1 2,641,701 !,630,764 2,942.644 2,143,1.12 2,143,507 2,717,113 2,143,114
2,912.183 2,141,701 1,940776
64Y,7_UWT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 724,367 1,641,112 1,733,711 2.264,441
CITIES
066 F366 2,167,143 2,701,714 2,727.713 1.2M,232 2.445,114 2.123,176 2.147.050 3,015,272 3,061,240 2.3N,021 3,484,3t7 3,456,603 1.114,ON 3,751.0741
7,4n,147 3,µ3,m 3,666,146
hadra N,89t 64,046 211677 362,001 364,110 300,770 333,140 317,135 383,567 111,656 310,071 676,017 130,"1 214,111 164,516
570,372 146,841
TOTAL 6,776,160 1,070,186 6,757,11114 1,561,344 6,717,333 9,731.765 1,13701, 1,377,305 4,101,502 1,917,632 6,557,110 6,130,110 7164,776 7,729.344
0.214.00 6,161,564 1.633,171 i
AGENCY EYPENSEi (/000)
' fw/C6M 144 ,SM 6U,771 1,111 1,DDt 147,077 {50,160 631,264 751,641 643,130 002,645 657,831 170,037 072.714 {107,1711 1111,113
1161,Y.3 61",143
P" O 3 Y Win 123,630 936,1162 526,001 121,20 930.682 $31.133 6»,314 731.102 1,415 MIDI 831,001 $47,611 {11,210 MID? 64SA21
571,354
TmwWbO 93,121 $1 Im 64,111 11.116 64,216 ",323 $4.431 541642 64,656 54.772 64,611 0.013 06,130 64,251 75.3"
56,130 0,672 ,
AdbLAGem $knl 89.166 ",831 111,136 14,273 ".112 76.653 6401 111,842 ".710 {10,$10 510,267 400.444 110,"3 {10,764
{10,023 111,061
DOMIwrk6 076,011 171,14 071,06 01.164 1,174 141,676 1.831 1161AN 1105.1" 1170,111 5314694 9120.457 /121,264 1130,116 /$$4130 8130,144
1130,113
Caw601 Pwd 937,837 W.637 72113+ 617,137 127637 727,637 127.137 127,137 621,137 621,137 321,177 127,637 02?037 87631 131,837
627,131 121,631
Rw11r8R17f 62,0" "i'm 8 1 t,7N $11.600 116.164 110,90 810,941 {10,521 910,570 111,373 SWAM 110,600 MOO 110,664 114I,6"
61000 110,5"
TOTAL EXIMNSE 6114,1" 8110,164 {201,710 9313.104 6221,603 821.640 S732,N7 9341,670 5257,716 7264,203 8360.436 5214.710 5263,644 1336,011
WINS 936.166 6423,426
AGENCY REVENUE ('.'100)
Cor"d 0104 1136.127 1137,201 1113,164 6153,865 1IH,736 6162.361 1161,012 11711,193 6111,630 11",332 $113,110 {641,147 83N,CN WIN 8337,676
1213,164 0265,121 t .
1 111.4/ MIS? 646,044 1,335 644,026 $1,047 656,832 7$1,832 461,161 583,540 NEW 163,344 170,821 172.113 607.246 {$26,610
{110,30$ 8164,004 ~
;p SII4e917 111.611 612,064 612,00 912.640 $12.00 WAN 112.000 812,00 112.000 112,000 612'm 112AN 112,000 612,010 612.000
012.00 112.00
001$7 at~ N N " " N (053) (1) (864) ("5) 11711 WS) 4371) (642) (1) • (164) 83107) (WIS)
"V'-.- TOTAL REVAR 6117,774 61".116 1701,144 520,641 9371,1" 1264,640 6231001 8241.700 7267711 5264,203 12M,433 0314,110 6273.640 1336,017
WI.60 9316,250 5423,120
7Y ixP124Ns (1640)
Cr~Owa 8136,127 6137201 7143,406 9163,066 6161,636 6162.311 5194,613 6176,173 7MA" 81",33) 6164370 7301,917 9364,60/ 8331,114 5236,646 S713,1011,
1251,771
444717 W.161 646,661 SMAN 616.0111 544047 640.232 SMAU 651.841 663,140 W041 663,310 170421 572.71/ INN4. 11201610 1140.301
(164.014
II NoahrtA .644301 1,064 "4111 164.105 6194,10 6114,013 1127,206 1141,271 1162,173 1112.IN 1164,201 5201.161 6230,127 SM.2" $=?$a
0211102 620,6(0
' I 0"hN 610,313 810.144 111.643 ".714 64.641 ".3N 16.171 64.6" 89,649 $$.an ",464 WRO 0.124 67,162 11,102
IYAN 17,443
TOTALiAIE164L 6271.64! U",Sn 6264.114 $"a" SM."I SM.993 03444D 6364,310 6407;647 5433.072 µ44,17S µ16.1N 7570.473 6661,833 8614.141 "32.161
NN734
77SC CITY REV. WN)
CaM1i1 Rw0 837,831 427,84' 827,07 127,037 831.137 627,137 W.937 127937 617.131 821.931 527.937 WAV 127.937 {27.137 127,137
121.137 12/.231 I -
/ 01 Spam 111,116 121.143 113,01 $4,470 "Aft $6.112 64,227 1402 ".293 ".N2 40.013 14.184 14,241 020.604 731021
8,7U {64"1
111 k so 40 N 40 N N so 00 so
OMr.27471619 00 " so 00
TOTAL*P.'rA* 147,006 644,110 611.164 132.501 84643 631070 SM.062 831,641 4A1" 631.714 538,1" {11731 130.011 10,311 MM
140.666 11404 ;
i
C%Ndc" /33/.142 /245.316 8364.364 6273.627 IMIN SSUAN 6332.371 6345,620 87201 "14331 0110.126 ► IISA4 6641.310 640.041 003107 072,370
1614232
AWAAOS COSTOF MOGY "A"
114 163.02 IN" "a at 0.11 062.17 1.15 SON 674.13 inn 171." 893.23 1.21 . W." VtO 116" 67164 ~
A~gIjM p 1.31 54711 1." IS it 0A1 0.64 1.45 SON 640.03 161A1 844 1.64 110 670.M 671.46 17240 1734 ~
iI1 Y61rp161.1000)NPYa61% 4,360,164 6l1616w Yew (I!I6. 2011) I4PN a 1.1% S,006,64
04 NA. 483% 403% 1.86% $.40% 1,30% 3.64% S04% 7,64% 211% •1.72% 1102% 3.61% 4.31% '..7,Ot% S.In
4m
N 1RY 711.56, KA 283% 236% 414% 2.54% 070% 5.30% 151% 6. I7% 2.41% 0.14% 1.26% 5.11% 2,14% 0.'7% 5,2115'
014%
i
. ._.._.......~.«www~...w.wr,ru•wwy W.S2.Ri46lIi'W1LIM~:a~~,w,~~~.~.-•---....._.~..
1
rc,$.
I
r-
7 r~ ♦ ~ ~ eS' Ei i~C "i ,
~arlson
R
r 1 r 1 I/ n1 r
1 I
1
' 1 I r 1 1 1 1
00
1 I 1 1 1
oe!
........1... ww.. u~..w.....1.........j...................
1 1 1 / 1
/ 1 1 1 / 1 /ho CA omy fti j
1 1 1 1
........~.........1.........~........ ;
4 1 1 I 1 / /
1 1 1 1 . r / / wan m HIIIIS h~ ~
, ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1
t~ r 1 1 r / 1
1 1 I 1 I / r
/ msoCIO
1 1 I w I w 1. r I
• 1 1 1 1 r !
I~ ! 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 ~
1~: 1 I r I 1 I I
1 1 1 r I /
r
r 1 r 1 i
! E~ .
r 1 1 1 i i i i / Coq A 19M
la ~ti, ; 1 I / 1 1
i'S w.. w/•w. a ..u w......► a {.....w//.Mw/.../•
fa ~ 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I 1 /
1 r r 1 1 1 I irR~WAM
{ / 1 1 1 1 r x''7777
1 1 1 1 1 1 ~
1 1 1 / 1 I 1 {
1 1 1 1 / 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 / I r I
' 1 1 1 I / 1 1 .
r 1 / I I I /
1Y1 i
g b i M" f
100
b a f' 1 ill 1!
M1 r
F'.
6194
~
TE3W M7MC6°AL PON11,R AGENCY
Pun Dols V"
` WEfRCO.TW YAI~OVFl1 PmV tti$Wmmt of Rwwm na Empwm 4 7Fe
WD0404 1 711711 114294
Pop I
1840 1194 1997 INS 1t" 2000 2001 2%7 2093 2%1 Sip{ 2,41 1007 3094 2094 .910 7011
OE7 OUTIONOM"
C 6mCIVA 2,121,131 1,820,021 1171794 2,111,330 2,8",YI 1,131,102 2,171,061 2,941,001 IWAR 2,943,3911 2,943,722 2,913,199 2.643.113 2,143,014
SAWIS 3,143,7% 2,041,176
N
OUN? f 0 f 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 724,367 1.941,412 1,731,711 2,254.111
1
ORIU
On I190 34767,742 2,941,114 1921,133 12"A" 0"IS0 1921176 2,641460 3416342 106th 1,304,01' 2,194,217 3.454.443 1,110,0% 3,160,076 3112,647
1699,776 3,6164105
W4Mw N,MI 09.94 213,114 30,015 SKIN 40.776 14140 356,4:6 111,111 411,10; 633,871 SATIN 130,771 3421141 1441566 IN,%!
I46,641
TOTAL 1761.494 6,991[94 1701131 !•6111.437 0,777,331 6,636,135 1217,971 1121306 1101,011 6.943.3741 6.117.710 0.630.440 1,164,770 7.794,394
1111,000 8,441,048 1,933,111
AGENCY DMD4E8 94000) }
Fwd Cod (
"1313 94,437 611A12 0"AN $4470 $43,010 15,481 $40.371 "14" $4IA67 141,401 644,326 MAU 601433 1131,494 1116,433 4011,476
E
P1060914 024.14 021,094 $31,791 $27.003 121.204 $30.603 $31,160 833.41 631.690 531160 618,8194 49.1N $41.403 694,224 WAI2
$49.010 951,230 f
I7nw I - 13,021 13,1177 14,814 94,116 64.1s $4,323 $1,431 04.11] $1.684 $4.77d 61,191 $5.413 5,1311 /5,207
61.394 is 136 6102
A41%A *a 94,70 13,941 1194[ K131 NA33 84.60 811.563 low 00.042 96.101 110.40 110.82 $10.446 610,601 611162
610,923 WIN?
Od199nb6 $71010 1".262 "3,111 841.114 841"4 NIA" N133I $701,106 11N,8N 6110,111 $111934 101491 ' 6121,856 $136.133 1131330 613114
6136.193 ~
ComwF" $77,137 IV.10 st:,,:o' W" 177,"7 s"? IVAV $21,131 627,$37 127.137 "7.137 [21..21 WAS? 3VA37 127.111 $27.637
Iri
' ,137 i
AVON I PAO 82940 [1941' 411.094 $JUN 611/N 614AW $40.941 SISA21 06.176 611,31:1 610.60o $11000 8111100 .10,800 sit"o
410.00 010,500
TOT., VPDW 6184,894 5131& 6111130 $301194 13t7.094 $3111,336 9221.426 "31,14 1244,874 ;$41600 9261,670 $374,237 9211025 gN.01$ 64,4M
$W.341 $412,154
AOD CY NVID" (00"
Y C0601A OML 6131194 "11643 ;5/1941 11",094 1;94,[92 ;76161/ 6173454 1177,10 $194,194 $142,014 8107,64► $701,002 $311,613 $294,019 1194,690
17/1172 0}56.633
.
111494 13017" 841.0 "SIGN 541,367 "1111 147,3" $43,021 $13.243 $41,642 644JM 143.101 11147.931 9S1%33 "S'"S 810,723
$tM406 tI41,621
~1 r W Ib" 111.01 611000 61000 612,89 {13,000 117246% $12,000 $12.000 942.000 s12.000 111,001 613400 $12,000 611694
$11000 612,000 . Pto%
10/4!!434049 NI N N 84 0 (1163) (6682 (94) mm till) ON) (O71) NW ("6) (6N) (6197) 0m)
TOTAL Fw1em It"."4 6184,13s $194,731 1309,991 1317.084 4311.330 IM421 "32.6111 8140,271 1441101 IM,170 "74" 6167.646 9724,011 12".21
"82•"1 1417.164
( Ow81 l )11366129 6130.6" $141,061 6194.121 31"•M! 6[".011 $01,494 $177.0 1164.400 6161.% 6117,447 6194."2 821%•"6 6220,431 of 1./94
1043,1n i111433
flow SAM $41.947 "CiN 841.17 14.16 $41394 643,121 $43,142 $10942 SO.$" $41.01 617,984 (NAYS "1949 611112.0 $12$,406
}145.129
H1113.►" [94.394 Wo$4 WI% $"I= SW40 sill ll 61".N 1141,277 1152.733 111110 110,200 $MM 1230,337 3236.34 "21,116 6341.112 1141,150
I
O"AW $411./1 111"11 84.943 sm" "A" N,8N ",III Wis 0101 float 94.456 ".210 94.121 ".NI PAN $7,04 $7:m
TOTALDV"41. $371.94 1017.730 &174 $301161 "111% 13311" 1360.114 "71.411 1300,121 6417.771 6"1,111 84714" 1694.670 $661694 "91,2)1 6116,0011
1149„11!
S. I~I
mft ca MK (1000)
f 00461606 R4A $21" 947,131 $VA47 137,$31 131.37 137,$37 WAS? 127.31 8I7,67 127.137 $271137 627'.37 $37.137 "7.177 911'•037
$37•.31 01331 '
.00036 ton. $16.94 021,801 613,111 64.119 0110 11145 94.709 00.21 "•173 84,840 11.04 HAM ".137 820.41. 1>r,817
131[[1 119114
0949491/16 0 N i0 N N 0 N 10 61 0 00 0 84 10 10 0 so
TOTALRtM" $41.06 111119 $41.191 1319" 133.461 031842 151,0N SIAM "446% $MJ" $31841 131731 131,011 841310 "'AM 110.411
171."$
II E i,
Cq*yNAGM UM,743 IMAM 0261,331 &1.33 SM" $3",7" 6111942 $3311= 9%1,112 &Wool "%1471 $41761 84».694 007A1s "74144 1117.54 ISU,N6
AY11MOt OM 011 "WY Oft"
' ' ^ " ~!}9!~10 INN 014 04.37 1" 814,84 MCI6 943" 84$ 91 1" is PC" in 31 s" so 002.61 . "7460
11117 41243 '"2 $3
M0111n119r 14.30 s"A1 $494 101kI1 *140 611.71 SU44 $all $KID "9.94 WN 844." 947." 00121 161161. $P131
91217'; `
> a, /1~NTCIMIIOI$kYWi"".3"WVSO.% I,3"I" aft4mmYew(IN6.2011) NoveI'm 10730.184 I
a~' ~Mq OIMI I9A, 3.12% S,"% J'An I,N% 1.94% 3.94% 1.94% $.N% 1.04% 3.34% 1.64% $.69% 407% •1.10% 2.16%
•140%
,R~661161 4A. 3.10% I'm 3.111% ..10% 6.76% 1.31% 5.1616 1.4716 11(% 2J7% 002% 319% 9.53% 11.17% 229%...
t.99%'
1111;
, ~r.i «.~v _.aa..~a~...+.rs++.YU.I.i.u.,Yfw,JY'.,4AN.4ww..M1w~i.....a..._..~...ar.«r. ~Y~~.a...~..a
)
~ Y
'1111
r -
F '4 ~ M Ir pf F
R ~ Y
x
NW,
~vr
1 I I. t 1 1 1
n.EEEEr
1 1 / 1 1 1
j
't ~ 1 , 1 1 1 I 1
1 1 1 I . 1 /
an am OQx
1 1 I 1 . 1
WAN ZAft
1 1 . I
E
Rl all (yf
' "3 Tt} 1 1 1 1 1 1
J 1 I 1 1 !
a 1 1 1 I I 1
7. 1
~ w 1 / 1 1 1 1.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
;t 1-
{ s a. 1 1 f ! 1 ~T A R
11 $ 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1/
4 r I 1 1 1 / 1 ,r
1 1 1 1 1 1' ! "'R, ft*w
1 1 1 1 1 • f
"
/ I 1 1 I 1
. u•... a r......... N
45
1 1 1 1 1 1 j.p /X; ~~•1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J , i~
1 / 1 1 1 1 1
40 1 1 / 1 I 1 i
,~drlr N ~ .
r
.
r
' ~i
6.;.
Iwo
TjW MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY J1 DO@ 1V10N1
P,*M SI95r1+r t d RMn11 W EVWA" DIN {V10191
3_Pna_6vsE =6
E9pe 2007 NN Eaw 2919 7011
20
205 2002 2083 2004 1996 1996 1967 1996 1924 2024
0 0 0 715,170 1,025,25{ 1,711 656 2.231.1 11
OEIGMTION7 43
t 64AaM~ 2.921.130 3,2K,f13 9,211,9610 3,252,7 0 ].22{,0130 3,234,193 3,2{0,333 3,2{1,7370 {.249,0.37 3,25!,24 0 5 32631 o S,Z52,K3 3,2U.671 7,752,507 ],249.243
3262.02 3.K+.
W_ p 4
~ 270,003 S7N.319 f~7w073~3/ 1572.902 S,3S5,1Y+ 3,316,957 5,241.426 7243,543 3.317.070 ],{59,/03 3.{41,011
11E
VMS 296,154 428,1{7 312.016 236,160 12!,213 140,24! 1}2.251
tote Fle ub 1,757,743 2,752,340 2,471.140 E,150,124 2.3/5;0 440324/0 MI X$ 2,
4445 60,615 160.432 272,200
4124.,/24 4oM,1" 4324,117 6.64107 4217,071 4043,724 6,217.{77 0,113,421 0.411,725 0.743576 6,963,196 {,996,427 1,105,420 7.411.416 1,545.06E 4683,496 0,000,304
AOE11C7EXPENSEf{11 24440 24/,111 6646a 163,767 324.451 654,776 04966 $63,004 N5,069 07,311 969,362 671.430 6501,3" 1140.1133 6152.9!3
11KI00
Twom N "i31 611.424 117,240 $11,63! 249,107 720,3:6 1121.2" 12222] 722,232 724,27/ $25,50{ 716,506 127.100 729,247 "1,267 533,077
"4,65e
rib 18,491 24,323 212" 24,643 µ,6N 24.772 N.NI 24.013 27.134 11,967 $,2/7 14631 88,672
FWI0011
7ww WOA .831 ",411 $4.414 616 "'041 Ads 6001 24.737 $4,610 WW $6.776 SON? 'm, N.tTO $6.124 10.454 88.696 ",130 ",240
710.031 110,154 410,337 640,412 110,649
47.476 693,24E 771,624 425,!54 624,77/ 24I,666 724."1 4191,124 6,24,244 010.1111 1156."4 020.457 "x.206 4170,115 6530,13D $130.144
1530.1"
p1166nk/ 7 627,637 $27,837 427.031 $27,837 727,"7 30,900 i2N,937 1127.1137 47,500 24.500 WA001 "21.0000
PAW & W 4.437 4,137 74 4.437 121,60 727.43
1>,100 24,633 $6.924 14624 24,963 24.966 $6,IN $6.924 0.960 114.011 H,N6
TOTAL !X47741! 9124,724 7117,60 61$2,024 $200,111 410,047 "19.110 $210,100 1231.24/ 6243125 4781,$1T 1261,13E 11260,624 44.177 1310.241 {352,40
6704137 1314.470
$136.121 7136,00 6134.003 1145.424 1157,104 1167,800 4163.493 4104637 916's" {701,,0 $117.171 719,.420 1167,"1 6.'00.211 $219.230 5222,145
"73.17$
f
54506 f4 ;062500 j,0a 1112,M0 $12.00 AN "ZMO t 2.000 7tE~Da 1417 1 02,00 N 6600
C01'17C1 D60\ 116021
W Ep 134.761 90,674 640,767 242'917 Nil 641 2414 2431 050 $470 2491 2453 7534
"IAN 117.000 812.00 1+E.0 612..007 $0 0 ,
f ` ISIMr PAW" N
TOTAL Nye" 4167,171 /167,14 61020$6 1200,111 1210,042 "14610 11MNO 1231,409 6243,126 4251,711 626474 SM,HO 4274,12' 1310.961 634103
M137 "09.470
-
t.
1136.179 $176,006 $171{,245 /144,M7 fM,N 6` 6~~ 6`u'~ $17{344.624 6166{ 164 $187.977 1101,406 1ii6],1~ 11 i6 494143 2430.6 0 f451~1ia
SM676
WMdNOO$6a6= 14,]05 175306 4160.01:.
FEy"1'14t01 104246 241,131 243.17/ $64676 416,111 6101.411 4120,221 1133,"3 1141,137 6143,331 6170.024 6164,222 6214"0 6221.6" " 04124
s?.m VAN S7.6" ST.03
p3,161 5444/ 7211.607 443,
- 04111 F'r0i 610,363 410,140 88,943 10,744 88,54 10,361 $6,171 $6,g OWN 4/410.631 3136717 5491,220 2416.624 6S3o 4562,0.37
6683,124 N34,M!
TOTAL IXPOOL $274,641 67",!24 6210.371 /224,737 88aJE1 "22,627 6313.796
6 ~p~ 024 6T1 41!,24 A3r 47.41 $2711137 VIA? "7."7 $27.937 07,"1 "7,"7 421,"1 4,"J 627,837 677,"1 "7,"7 11,931 1127.4133
6 $4.114 61,277 Will? $6,711 {9,164 24.321 24.196 410.621 14.749 710,767 "4.377 p/,1" "74511 Oft ,724
02.?"
YI/C. U1Y REV. (loaf i ,
1
C&AfW Plod 1
09f11En1r 6 10 6311 "+1 019 1310 2716 8342 "14 "1/ "11 "16 1719 "11 "79 "19
~
R3wr 0 "19
j TOTAL REVENUE N7.fa 6611761 743,071 934.31E "6,429 736,183 "6,367 "1,532 837,4" "7.302 "1,122 "1,901
"6.91,1 652,4" 164.]46 144,971 460,324
c ~ "21.143 SMOG 1WADI 6262.161 $270,294 $297,742 !301.401 SSE7,S" "0,741 "73.464 OWN? 6120,196 µ24.45S 6171,127 2496,1-00 2429,071
4554,211
A~VEM wet of ENEROY 0166240 71 656 $7.67 653 " "1" 65419 4.17 HVAG ST M 4 r 96S 32 MAN "7.21 !61 u
/~1I~ry 166,24 245.7` ~ ssuiut 424 H .41 $3164 s"N 424 24 447"
. 65054 "1'76 654.a PS .46167 6+1RT1 $034 621. SCAM M VW (191'3.2011) WV 0 6 5% 3.6",234
] 77% 3, 43% 0.13% 2 NX 3 NR
fItY011(I"s 321 10, 6 66% I,274612
y P9A06" FIANOE K A .3.12% 52M 5.24% 64.24`.4 /,47% 4.a% 414% 111$6% 4.21% 265%
"W 5,2M 3.02% 3.24X 796% 4421 6.]6% 4.12% 5. % 1.00% 2.64.11% 1.13% 0.19% 7.16% 11%
At cry b" K A d.N% _
y p.
1
11~I
I
J
Syr .
b l Kr
l aP~ tl
Mil1la
d 31
rtyf,~,v7: F I~141 e. ~ 1 . y~;e> ~ ~2 •I + E
Y
lson
X) 3? kI1 1 Rl~ 1 ''4
rM ~n f• f / I / !MI On 07]1 1M1';t
G y` t t 1 I / / • I / y5
♦al R~ 1 I I t I / n.
pl r 1 1 1 i i i
4 [t~rR ' is I t 1 /
. r .1
..........r.........w0~
' ....i. I / / low
~ t 1 1 t t 1 / ~*pftw"
./........•I.u... u..........
1/lJ/1(~~ 1/y~My/ ~R k 1 CA ell 9yt~.y . S~?V i`;~•d=~ M•I b .'1 ~
p l 0 1/l 'iy 1 "f
j
LM
Ito .
r ft's
I
TEW l VWGPAL VWYER AGENCV
~ ow t1no94
1 f 41"J00H P OWM $Wwrst of Mvw m W E■ w4m PRt Wow nn 091
!
I ! 1696 1616 1197 1666 1666 2000 2001 2002 2007 2004 2006 2006 2007 "m 2006 2010 2011
CITIoM Vl"
AGENCV
06tt0mDO* 2,621,131 2,226,713 1,200,171 3,10,144 3,211,061 7.223.636 7,271,603 7,244,434 $245,333 3,246,611 3,251.424 3,251,696 3,252,177 3,252.261 3,24443
3,254102 3,261.615
NEW LWT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 716,029 1,623,210 1,711,656 1,234,111
CITIES
a" Fired 2,161,142 2,162,340 ;41,710 2.150.01 2,345,106 2,461,356 2,701,773 2,176,731 2,441,334 0.161,121 3,753.123 7,316,147 3,446,121 3,613,643 7,117,670
3,46S.WJ 3,01,011 j
F-d~640 K"t 111,11 161,454 213.644 216,317 20942 276,121 244.365 701,374 322,992 293,164 426,547 342,116 236,100 123,203 10,013
152,261
TOTAL 6,116,454 6.041,177 6,12,396 6,M.660 6,136,271 6,003.613 6,201,007 6.408.541 6.161.02{ 6.74 1,631 6,M433 6.911,640 7,203,420 7,111100 0,343.162 4,612,466
1,010,301
AGENCY E7PEN8E807000}
F091Ca1 6µ,3M .46.613 054.401 148,7111 102274 $44,654 754.600 671,711 374.779 671,151 641,OJi 661X0 107.637 1116,447 4160.701 171.614
64449
?100034 124,447 S11AN 317AX 111,642 311,490 320.343 $21.270 442,144 443.231 924,296 321.510 SK'a" 447,140 126.443 $31.241 177.On
SKN2
j Ta06t1yi0t 33,121 63.917 K011 K116 94,216 $4,327 K431 14.512 64.660 94,773 341.401 $3,00 WIN WXT 44,399 86.04M 44,677
Aft & OML N7V ",1$ "A" 30,"1 44,107' KIM "'in 0.214 60,434 60,505, 1627" $4.Otb 10,071 010,106 110,937 310.402 10,649
Ow IOWA" 071,011 11,14 3746" K1,164 31004 111,066 161,331 1101,156 0106,064 $110,111 155,63) $120,451 0123,244 $530,1 I6 $134130 1170,14
' $130.153
Co01n261bt 52►A37 621A77 /27,447 927,967 02707 $27,937 127.937 $27,447 927,017 $27,937 127.837 321.931 44707 127.937 12707
621.021 621,937
it &A* 52,960 64.933 14911 16,41 KIOI 0.161 IVAN 31,160 0.60 0,654 ".16 ",300 WIN WSW WSW WIN 01600 ~
TOTAL EAPE1/61E.. 11N,IN 3196,0" 5110,747 1206,276 9211Att 6227,"3 447610 620.143 6764,003 3261,017 1217,471 9210.461 4460.140 4420,042 3770,644
$115,366 6411,071 ~
wC01AndDom 1131,120, 13LOM 11N,064 i0.4,414 154100 1157,664 5193,151 $10,611 176,603 5501,112 197,830 1111,10 167,104 5244,20 9216,730
44tt.11 SMW
631,151 0µ,N7 10,03 /60,41 661.360 WAN "0,14 313,116 640,116 $0,674 013,157 571,344 671,123 101,211 134.643 150.761 173.51{
r, 1 61111 11 113,044 112,000 112,00 112,OM 112,00 $13,000 612,000 12,000 MAN $12,000 112,000 12.000 12,600 112,000 112,000
12,000 SUM
.4 OPW RNVKO10 " " 60 K K Sm 1454 6417 3W6 $431 547$ 5412 8613 0447 563 "a 1696
TOTAL REW'" Hq.714 4106,064 1N.747 3201,276 9210,10 9217,60 923/,11 016.43 324,101 SM.017 9273,470 9210,44 SM140 1326.012 4470.530 1755.796 3111,1"
CITY Upa"11
C~DOL {16,121 6431,010 131,054 1111,14 S54.a,1N SISI,664 193,410 6141,61t 1176,6a 151,692 1117,660 6111,002 1117,004 3100,290 6211,76
$221,161 4433,192
1 r E
Enq 331,111 940.067 $0.60 $0,961 3a 607,676 140,014 00915 344,644 $0,074 373,157 076,380 171,727 $107.510 At31,H3 1150,71 171,111,
' „ FUM11 a 101.300 4".131 114"1 5",46 SK146 1107.121 $120,230 133,134 61",137 103.M 6171,160 1194,122 6216.10 $724,692 9211.106.
1232,446 140.115
0*w ftw 00,70 MIN 0.143 K744 "040 K,3" ",171 01611 44,16 K013 $4,454 0,70 IC124 $702 37,602 $7," 07.403
r~ TOTAL EXPEII/- 1274.647 344,110 62KM UK{2S $314,213 tULM 00.114 071,211 6361,11 6423,146 3446.464 6470,454 $30601 00.050 $560.111 31117,243
44".051
~ Rlu 137,961 921,931 621,531 6211027 447,021 447,x1 447,027 627.937 927,617 92/,817 92i,u7 671,027 177,027 921,027 131,027
37.7.021 621027
> { COS"* EV.4100q
.0/&S/Emf 1tI,"3 627.641, 651,331 K07 II,14 "AU 44,74 K160 4210 610,041 ".757 0141!1 5.'4.403 0419 . $47.171 6x,124
Q114r R6wA K 014 $310 1311 1310 $319 6310 $311 $310 $311 Ott 4419 Nit $110 $316 4416 9311
TOMVNEIVE" 647,106 161.144 643M 01,10 06,260 SN,011 SAM 937.324 44'.454 33/,206 01.114 $34.113 631,135 02,83 166.640 301,121
, W.111S
CIh IM Cat 4414742 SM193 PIK$" 9206,483 0271,14 1711,016 4417.13 5370,04 446,56 4411,196 410.416 5435,66 9411,416 1496,64 4413,142 6017,110 6370319
. 922.0 44713 101.1 644%
AVERAGE COIT OF E111ROY 4436140
Apr1q NO.N W11 6013 02" 6".60 IN 14 K0.93 03,37 161.14 611.64 3it.71 17764 $710
11614
t AS V4ilr 14.33 6011 $47.01 $4.40. 0".17 141.93 86744 0334 $67.70 10.4 "t if 10174 $8131 KL6G $",1 10.70 17001
.
SAYM (IM .2000) WN G 1.6% 1.310,796 64461om YMr (1196.211) NPV 01.6% 3,"1,212
PCACENTCHANOE
4.17% 4.37% 4.r*% 4.17% 2,17% 1.00% 3.60% 4.67% 244% 010%
AmWM( ILA. 3.0316 $92% 674% 6.1% 4.61% 463
6' > w0O~A'; Y6Y N. A. 400% 1.11% 2IN $.N% 1.90% S77116 SAM 4.44% 1.50% 4.07% a N% 4.11% 1.03% 0,54% 249% . 164%
{
Ilk
1
r
WI
i
m r✓y^fj+ 2 krski~ it ,t ,~r'rv ,a k~gw tv rS~ x ~'y, t) ~ r,~ ~ ~ 7( ~ a~x js Z a `il/~'~`c r~ r r
Ls..p ,,E ft~ > s NO,
d M L 3 t
e7 x'u r t r~F i a'
n son
VWXV
• 1 1 I 1 1 /
ba owl ~ s , I I 1 I I 1
1 1 J • / 1
, 1 1 1 1
1 1 J .yLJA
' ' .r........ .E
: , ' 1 ~ ; / ~YYq 11fA 7Ybwle J ~Jnn~
d I 1 1 • 1 / ' rP, ,
M1,~ 4 , 1
ml*cm
' ........I .1.........~ ......f........•..................
L"Ahpw
' e^„' : i........
I 1 1 1 1 I 5
' 1 1 1 I 1 . 1
♦..w. ww w.. a ..l. w..w. wr.u a
1 1 1 1 1 f I
y a,
nPMy
~~S pt
v
- _...••••,..,.....,...aa.ww~w~o.l3www.wM.a.w+w.rw.+a~ruwratmvr w+s:........-....-_~~_
tau r:.,, .
,
TE3W MUNICIPAL POYMA AGENCY,
Deb LVW
AP-01.301 Al ,UP GISIONS CREEK Prokmw Sk r wd d Rnanus mW nFlow
E+96 6 Dab 1 1f11 dN
Pop o
GENERATION MY" 1006 1146 1007 11111 ION 2000 2001 2042 2007 20" 2000 2000 2307 2000 2004 2013 2011
AOENCY
OObon Cnwi 1.121.131 X$24&11 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 a a .
NEW UlaT 1 t /,Y4,101 1,223,611 4,071,624 4,433,000 4,774,106 1.640703 4,846,364 4,133.049 4,410,161 4,761,/1& 4.141.264 6,574,215 0,6",442
4m.687 7.041.196
c(TIES
ON FVW 2,767}42 2,101,114 1,170,621 1,102.711 1,112,003 1200,710 1,320,003 1,170,313 1,600,725 1,146,451 1,711,346 1.793,446 2,041,31!
1,581,444 1,681,158 1,663,214 1.656612
P18rAe16 80,61 68441 14t601 746213 313,732 323,126 170,363 219,233 637,964 332,11& 344,517 430,711 374,894 216,401
30,661 101,113 ww
TOTAL $.180.464 6,6241100 0,121,171 6,641,000 3.171.861 11,051,320 1,171,312 1,110,32! 6,468,247 6,731,663 4.64,04t 1.001.82 1,266,502
7,776,121 6,31X461 1,171,100 0,447,744 ii
AOENCV UPEMMS (WM .
7rf Ca11 141.303 646,1176 411413,4941 0047)6 616,1$1 SIa,W4 1121,341 1124156 $132.440 11X014 6162,293 M.093 8171,185 620X266 9211,260
1261,401 1104.15
PM Oav 100,002 121,!30 SIM7 00,3641 68,020 $0,409 110,312 516,624 1141130 1111,676 112,104 $12.137 111,200 811,00!
111,906 110,311 511,17
Tommilow 83,021 13,317 11,31! 11,316 11,410 $1,445 $1,111 $1,114 11,664 61,695 4116" 11,476 11,111 $V" 81,104
$1,149 $1,91
I At t 043 $1./J7 Its" 04801 KIM KON 84166 86,267 KM 84,441 60,643 44,"1 68,711 68.642 $6.641 $1.041
67,155 17,26
Ow 11140" 87X073 977,24! 1502,921 1107,161 1111,644 0t14,J23 $123,001 1121,020 013US4 $131,461 SWAM 1147.127 $151,136 $164.7#3 6158.100
6168,614 6154,1: f
C AMP Pat 027,631 121,037 121,031 327.931 $27.017 037,437 621.131 VIA37 327.&31 327.637 WAIT 127,&37 IAA37 61,637 WAR
877,037 121,1
PARMa Roo 1700 WON 8100 1100 $100 8100 $100 $106 $100 sloe $100 $100 $100 1100 $100 1100 Ili 1
E TOTAL OPENOE SIKH$ 1191,110 11564 t46 641,443 1244676 4387,346 600.349 1200,313 611.871 1307.187 SMXD04 3336.197 6312,120 1417,2" 1414,790
1471563 1517.41
AGE11c r 11&vs72E (1006
1 CenY9at Ow 8744120 1133,705 8144,340 1114773 PROM 6190.216 1146,587 $110.141 616.403 1181,101 8117,174 1t12,758 1144,311 3207.16 $214,0"
$219,6" 630,7Y.
EawM 834ri1 513,6" 001,003 444,614 081.601 180,193 $110,641 $114.022 $121.124 1130.120 0141.0$7 1141.446 $131,7, $164.117 PUNS
644,330 671136
,I w arenw 111 p $12,000 MAN Site" 64Xooo $12,000 6311000 112.000 $12,000 Mom $13.000 811.000 112.000 112.000 $12,000
872,0" $12,0d i.
6,113 1X241 SX143 SX447 6.644 son 6X1#3 WIN 93.60 63.187 6,67 13,37
TOTAL REVVM 1503,174 1161,100 600,146 61,100 660,tri 671,246 610,841 3200,311 SM.2711 $321,187 SM3. M 9354817 314X60 4411,100 0070,700
$41463 6817,41k
it C/TV E%P!7"E1 ty0u~
I cWhIll O1w $134129 OWNS $14.646 Ww"S 11137,073 1110421! 61168,587 14ri,Nt 117413 11141,600 11'47,214 316,760 1116,271 1201,191 $211,014
$214144 1230.731 I.
Milo 334100 $6.161 301300 161,&14 801,601 604401 $510,311 1111,62 4121,121 $120,620 8181.587 111,646 $131,731 1104.311 $23777!
641,330 $211,30; i
` Flow AF" 864364 180,064 $46,011 864,001 MAW 801,64 004,910 811,114 867,1#3 600,29 1110,641 1121,621 3131,114 3134/64 9315.242
1138.111 9140.2K'f 06W Pad $44301, 010,146 80.043 68,744 K646 80.3" 80,61 Wm 86.80 $402 60.160 80.000 14171 87.16
6.07 PAO 41.463 '
TOTAL EVWNSE. -671,141 0280.769 1200,1661 $2941» $301.160 011.264 3"1.200 8373172 633,626 3420.460 6147.631 6474116 3603,31
1544,140 1176,31 0007.111 06/4,10
we cry PAV (0000)
Canr9la Aaal 121,657 WAS? 67.37 61,137 61.31 67.631 67,37 67,31 67,37 $27,431 327,937 61,37 $27.937 67.137 67,31 $27,07
67.37
OISy4Enw 874380 61.443 64100 14260 87.93 17,160 00.160 6410 60,440 60.71 $5X011 00,296 $11.110 172,,0 931.400
131."1 147.01
OIWAwwI SO 30 SM S"0 8344 6" N" MR ON am 359 3" 6" $366 366 SM
1• TOTAL 1111141448 M7.86 M4N0 444180 304.43 93464 61.340 67,643 OWNS 937.44 937.085 50" 931It 311.464 930.931 6",076
660,004 171.200
C lmmCOO 6M141 $MYRS 1246,871 664.670 SUM 14 $280.636 0113.116 636,870 64,011 $343.425 $01,433 1436,224 64611,436 64M.602 011.563 147,141
93»4447
AVE" OO&T OF ENEIIOY (9004
!1 314411(1447 830.80 101.711 043.11 143.11 16.44 461.11 MI.N in 41 011.00 360.11 $61" Ms" "1.17 447.66 $$1 $41.03
86744
i~ N11V 01111111111 $46.11 $0080 WAY 64.20 in" SAW 8311 53.01 447.40 $50.21 801.01 011.10 S".67 "763 8073
IN It $709
$II Yw (1tI w" ooPV 6) 3.8% 1,31441 S6vw06M Yw 11001.20I Ij wv l 6.3% 3,901,101
PEW" CHM"
0440 ILA X1446 dL60% 1180% 170% 2.60% 0.58% 611% 4,00% 374% S.M 1.00% 3.44% •1.4&% 1.12% 475% 049%
NagMMN KA 01% I.Ift SM% 2.03% 111% Efl% 4.12% 420% 3,15% 4.02% 1.76% 4.14% 1.0% 0416% J.U% IJ1%
j '
4L
:r
ti
..w
■Laill► ~ r
1 I ~'~H > fl~w •.~7'~C~'% ~ "bM ,j~tT~~pr~~ tl Jl ~ S Cro ~~F~ 1 4.~ 1 t'~ + ~ r.
r ~ r
y fHM1~
;
rison
r ''''SS'''' p
S
1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1
1 1 1 f 1 1 1 ~
1 1 1 1 1 1 I
S 1 1 I 1
•.......4.........r......... b j........ 1......... r..
1 1 1 1 /
~p
1 1 1 1 1 1
No CA oy.q
1 1 1 / 1 ;
1 1 f 1 1
~ V~rK ti......... j. a w..~..u a ' ...r........
i f l ! 1 1 I 1 • 1 1
/Thin TM Tdwm
f+ it 1 1 1 1 1 / iy
~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C1
1 1 1 1 1 1
ti
K 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
1•............... . / mw*cw
t! ~ 1 I 1 1 ' 1 i
~ij. 4.. , 1 1 . 1 1 1
3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 . 1 ~a
~ 1 1 1 1 1
1 I 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 I 1 1
45 .......►....uu.f......... ►w... ....,h w y. ►
• 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 + +iJ~"'N '
1 I 1 / I 1 1
' 1 1 I f 1 1 1
, 1 1 1 / 1 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ~
1 1 1 1 f I 1 ~
A f, 'r A L~.~i,r Q'2 J~~ 4•l0 J
pq. q
19 05'
4 C£
yTt~~;
•M
1 '
• i1~
1
11!
I
TEXAS MUNICIPAL POV" AGENCY
am 0414 n79a" '■J1
KWA_OSTC AND AYUP GIBBONS CHEEK Prokkrrlw sl.Ynw o d 114A Mw w E*wwX Repo Date I vIw"
f
In$ ISO 1957 1X0 1995 2000 2901. 2002 M03 2901 2005 2006 2007 2004 2011 2010 2011
GENEAATtCN WV"
ADEN ,Y
OOOan Cr1M 2,121,136 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WW WT 0 2,250,301 2,067,79! 1,711,470 2,321,117 2,431,711 2,740,071 3,041,201 3,001,711 3,133,941 3,217,607 3,157,015 ),254,372 2,171,S43
4,690,746 1,66.651 5,212,179
OT1ES
On 1144 2,1p,743 S.IM.M 2,071,20 2,6X.972 2,n1,014 2,03,101 2,949,660 2,"7,600 3,009,612 3,01S,NI 3,313,310 3,356,125 3473.354 SA12,7N
3,433,420 1,614,043 3114,206
pwdw0 N,NI 160,912 "7A" X.511 UTABI 612,112 394,641 217,564 20,642 290,34 MM 365,773 264,341 125,122 X,111 152.717
100,003
TOTAL 6,70,4" 9,N7,2N 1,6x,M4 6,176,110 1670,63 3,167,230 4,0KITS 6,318,626 9,396,317 5.X2,131 6,133,147 6,629,413 1,1M,06 1,706,642
B,122,1142 5,101,337 S,506,3N
AGENCY EA7rEN9E1(19X3
10w Caw W.W3 BN.TN 116.312 SURIS N6,4M 1171.,1513 6794" 161,171 1.61.7416 6X,270 U1,Tn 811,123 602,641 9120,764 1152,101
0159,202 SIN.417
plot 01Y /X,632 06,111 ",027 ".471 14.270 P.M N,256 12,243 0,"6 610,0" 110,1112 110,134 $11,361 112,503 113,3"
$13,067 117.394 I.
I. Trawrw4Na4 X.121 83,60 63.1911 X,612 12.718 93,472 9.969 64,00 KIM 64x4 Kul MAN 64,603 $4,716 KIM
61,9'8 63,067 {
AitAOw ".127 ",101 Skills 0.124 011,014 04,145 $6,257 11,751 $6,446 ".643 $6,641 ",741 X.642 KM '1 17,049
87,55 17,302
OwS&N400 17{,X1. 6116,137 0114.647 6120,783 0161,464 $131,%44 1136,122 9140,741 1145,676 $150,402 11N,nS 1140,015 $164,179 0149,706
614972t 1130,144 $110,153
t CorwS%6(►16 $.837 W.07 621,837 NT,837 127,031 821,437 127,837 127.837 127,837 127,07 1.27,637 $27,437 827,837 X7,131
$7,917 /27,637 X1,637
11119176 PAO "1 4100 1106 $100 $IN SIN 1100 tt00 1.100 $t00 9100 $706 0112 9100 $100 $100 1106
TOTAL E3VENSE 0144,119 62x.271 1221,276 1211.431 1231.917 1.47.012 9202.010 1276,145 M2,464 1211,4" 9206,113 1301,%36 X06,170 X42,612
4374,301 6X2,611 9372,219
AOE/ICV REVENUE (NN)
Ca mdDm 1136.129 6161,100 110,661 6150" i16L120 1146,253 8570,221 117S.M 01N,24 /185,314 61110,173 1196.119 $20.474 6204322 1.219,214 1111,200
9111.515
Elwp p1,1X 1113,901 8",111 847,277 W,1110 "4,016 177,641 147.264 "7,745 X00 811.,121 990,629 X3,076 61 17,N4 1131,172
6164,ON 11{.330
Yw4r011 i/7,09 112,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 612,100 $12,000 612,000 112,000 412,000 $12A06 112,000 $12,000 $12,000
612,027 112,000 $12,000 j
cow R011m4 10 N N so $0 12,145 12,241 12,742 12,417 U,SN "All X,7113 $2.111 ALAN 83121 X.121 03,372 !
TOTAL REVEI%I: 6167j11 1276,071. 6271119 $283,01 030.417 {247,912 9212,110 X76.844 6242,412 1211,496 9296,177 1201,164 1394.170 9102.66
X71,301 6342,611. X12,259
f
~;;.CI2YE7VEM6E1r'100u1
rr` Comdowa $131,121 6161.00 6150,159 $131,1" SISL426 114.x3 11701M $175,260 6160,x3 $163,334 1190,373 $195,419 1x.174 X0.422 011,263
9161,201 SIft,61S
b" 6111,751 01.101 8X,117 147,173 "6,112 "5,111 177.541 X7,244 1.67,746 "Y,W $11.427 $90,624 $83.071 6117,124 1131,132
1148,040 1763,X0
PY1111H1fI "4,301 $IK112 6153,110 6123'"1 1117.844 $121,410 1130,492 113.643 6144,026 016.1,306 1171,603 fIC5A13 1216,003 $216,043 1214,131
.1234,313 9294,153
06w►a6 110,311. 11.116 1.813 ".744 94,640 ",312 ".171 KN1 ",806 KW UAW N.M 68.124 XAe2 17,112 11,444
I1,IIS I
i' . TOTAL t11PEN6L W4,$41 X21.20 13470 X7.8T1 6364.610 8%.114 $367,422 $07,054 8422,471 SM,354 $11.162 64N147 6517.761 N53,11S1 697,716
"73,212 1411,904
1 how clTY1%Y.(1:305
Cwwp1 Plod #V w 8v 177 827,831 $27,831 $27,137 127.431 827,937 $27,631 127,137 127,11 127,337 121,631 12701 WA31 X7,837
X7,417 127,131
co go w WASS 61011 $11.149 83,740 0,420 83.112 X,212 MAN ".642 N.ns K154 34,420 "A" 114,143 8"Als 83.04
145,546
OfwAM%1 " N N N $0 N X 10 10 10 $0 N 10 $0 " 61. 10
TOTAL KVENUL 847,01. 842.760 $2/,6" 63.612 X1.30 837,35 137.049 X4,623 90.372 X4.373 1%,121 X2.457 X6,123 M7,042 X1,03
"7.X7 (?7,20}
. 01y mmC W X",712 N0,511. SM7113 5301,441 SM,445 1337,313 6351.273 1372,631 X16,496 0412,214 $432.172 8455,790 6411,676 6506,640 UnUS
1416,576 031,105
AVERAGE C06TOf tNEAOY (NSYMIS
' A6uIq Wr4) 160.12 W-N 19{.12 0103.1.8 t61 N W,N 879.N X691. A7.f3 87130 1791 MLN NL0 676.33 NON 663,12
011:
N a4 6*0 SAL." 11211 IOU $67.14 131.16 1".46 $9910 X093 U2 so 01.64 60 23 94612 01.9 0111% $6126 $".T1
IN dd
8MYw(19116-MKWa0.5% 1.606,00 t1/5/rlwYw(19"-2011)NPVg/.6% 3,171.337
PEACE" CINNOE
ML A 43.72% 4,14% 11.131A -1410% -1 n% -143% 407% 6.12% 090% M% 264% 0.12% -7.74% 4.1111% -0.41% '-01A,
AN dW VOW ILA 12.64% -0.16% 1.64% 1.64% 0?/% 1.17% 1U% 210% 1.94% J.m 3.40% 2.70% 4.0% 025% -6,12%
120%
I,
e
wool
X'„Q d'~ ~dy 3 x fR E Ic,(y {{Y$'
.~'1"■i~' f q'
b YA' ' Y +
pw`T'.1K~~/~T 9 _
y ~y
t~ ' • ison
s i
, 1 1 I 1 1
1 1 1 ,
, I
I • ..1..../....
I f 1 1
be cm (7G1m r
1 1 / 1 . I '
1 I
1 1 1 I 1 ; AN 7WK Lbw
i 1 1 I I I 1 1 y'PS
y 1 1 , 1 'if9
ir~ 71. . / ' •
{.1 ~ 1 1 1 1
AQ? 1 • I I 1 j I 1
y~ 4~/~ • ' ' 1 1 1 1
Pjf s ; , 1 1 I 7/ tavow
y " !
` I 1 1
1 1 1 I 1 1
1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ / Lp1 R hir ~ .
i i I 1 I 1 ~,r
w
• 1 a •..•...r• w.........
1 1 1
45
1 j 1 I 1 • I
I 1 1 . 1 1 I i
I /
' 1 1 1 I I 1 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 l
x".~ .+1117•
1
I
I
h7
w..:a
r~Y
r
southeast Texas
` Delivered Gas Pr;ce URedrIn PowrSym Percent
BASE Difference
Year Total PowrSym
Ending In Total
Week 39 Nominal Escalation Nominal EscaladW D Wed
4 Of $1MBTu 9G $IMBTu
1994 2.1150 2.036 -3.74% (1)
19% 2.1280 0.61% 2.12762 4.60% -0.02%
1998 2.2292 4.76% 2.22338 4.60% -0.2696
1997 2.3263 4.45% 2.32341 4.50% -0.21%
1998 2.4270 4.2,M 2.42797 4.60% 0.04%
1 1999 2.5274 4.14% 2.53723 4.60% 0.39%
2000 2.6499 4.85% 26514 4.50% 0.06% t
2001 Z6146 8.2296 2.815 6.17% 0.01%
2002 2,9854 6.07% 2.98963 6.209; 0.14%
2003 3.1738 6.30% 3.17488 6.209'e 0.396
j 2004 3.3674 6.11% 3.37172 6.20`lb 0.10%
2005 3.6772 6,23% 3.68077 6.2(06 0.3996
2008 3.7881 6.9096 3.80278 6.2U"6 0.489
i 2007 4.0199 6.12% 4.03856 6.20% 0.73%
- 2008 4.2580 5.92% 4.28894 8.20%
2609 4.6040 5.78% 4.504 6,01% 0.(70%
2010 4.7113 ` 4.60% 4,70218 4.40% -0.19% ,
2611 4.9172 4.37% 4.90907 4.46% -0.1T%
.
2012 6.1407 4.66% 6.12607 4.40'16 -0.30%
2013 6.3764 4.57% 5.36067 4.40% -0.46%
l 2014.40°6 ' 2.65% 6,688 4.40°6 1.34%
2016 6,8481 6.060A 5.83178 4.40% -0.24%
2018 6.1038 4.41% 6.08838 4AVA •-0.26% l
2017 8.3842 4,27% 8.35627 4.40% -0.12%
t "
j
(1) Never Executed in Powr".
I
6
t.
r
I
3 40
I
is
k-
4q
t
FUEL FORECAST - PRB
J.D. ENERGY FUEL PRICE FORECAST
POWDER RIVER BASIN • 6600 Btulib
Rsa11994$
2400 2001 2402 2043 2009 200;: 2M 244E 2M 20,E =1 20 t
1~ l~fl 1p8Z 19flH ifl89 ~ ;
Base can 22A3 21.73 22.13 22.68 23.25 23.26 22.63 22.11 21.54 20.67 20.27 19.64 18.93 18.38 18.04 17.77 17.53
High Cass 431.25 31.13 31.51 31.83 32.92 -33.64 33.61 34.04 34.16 34.15 34.41 34.67 34.76 34.79 34.95 35.09 35.28
Low Cm 14.00 445 18.18 17.99 16.05 17.96 WAS 17.80 17.60 17.30 17.12 16.89 16.87 16.38 1612 15.88 15.69
II Base Case 15.18 16.25 15.09 15.11 15°31 15.60 1544 15.60 15.61 15.57 15.56 15.50 15°45 15°40 15.38 15.32 1533 ;
}{;gCase 23.84 23.98 24.38 25.01 25.62 26°11 28.92 27.64 28.38 26.99 29.69 30.39 3112 31.80 32.60 33.41 34.25
Low Case 12.34 12.04 11.72 11.71 11.69 11.60 11.62 11.49 11. 3,'1 11.20 11.08 10.96 10.85 10.72 10.63 10.54 WAS
B" o Case (1) 111.72 114.38 110.89.111." 113.31 114.44 114.63 MAT 113.36 112A6 111.80 110.72 109.81 108.97 108.39 107.89 107,71
High Cass(2) 132.31 !35°54 132°04 132.48 134.74 !36.48 137.57 137.57 137.75 137.50 137.70 137.51 137A1 137.14 137.07 136.97 137.20
Lour Case (1) 91.39 139.27 87.10 86.87 86.81 86.22 66.23 85.39 64.36 63.18 62.30 81.36 80.49 79A2 78.65 77.88 77.19
Gl
Be" Caw 1!8.75 124.90 128.65 132.60 141.20 149.03 156.00 151°94 188A7 174.64 181,43 187.78 194.61 201.80 209.77 218.19 227.62
y High C446 138.28 148.41 150.88 157.93 167.91 17773 187.22 195,+34 204•71 213.54 223.47 233.20 243.51 253.98 285.28 277.01299.98
'
(1) 1996 TOTAL DELIVERED PRICES were hweasad by 50 center to reflect &W notice contract.
I2) Hipp Come nkLUW wrlh *h Cargo fuel price and Base Cate transpoAation plus 2 Slton. '
(3) EtaiaWd by 4.5 % kftV n•
I ~
l
Y
yr r
I
Fft r~
POifRR SUPPLY ANALYSIS
A comparison of the results of scenarios being considered in this study can be
f apQroached A number of ways. Two of the most common are a Net Present Value
The primary
E (N'1') analysis and averagge cost comparison on a year by year basis.
advantage of the NPV m:thod of analysis is that it allows consistent comparison
of options with different cash flows. It is used to select the best option from
a long tern viewpoint. Table 6 shows the 20-year Net Present Value with the
total City and Agency revenue requirement for each of the six cases which are
1 being studied.
TAILE 7
COMMON OF 20-YEAR NET PRESENT VALUE OF REVENUE REQUIREMENT
($000) 1
1. Base Case - GCLM $3,808,943
F 2• Weirco Case $3,735,166
TMPA operating GCLH
{ 3, PRB Coal - No Scrubber
$3,511,236
Base Fuel Cost
4. PRO Coal • No Scrubber
u $3,691,222 1
High Fuel Cost
5. Repower Olinger 3 and Oansby I
Lay up Gibbons Creek $3,691,96ri
6. Purchase Ca acity
Lay up Gib Dbons Creek $3,919,333
{
Present value of the various scenarios leads tc•-the following conclusions:
$212 illion cos fuel ct thevcurs et op ration prcthis
E,l,t value riavin s PRB coal at th
w ' translates to an average present value savings of 112.5 million per year.
}
Conversion to PRB coal with the high fuel costs provides a present value savings
of $26 million over the Wee o case with TMPA taking over operations of the Nine
(the best GCLM case studied).
4-I
ti
11, 0.
Sul
walwM rasa
Repowering Olinger 3 and 0ansby HoweverI and doesihavesa heek as esseintnithaally the
all
same cost as the Weirco case.
of the fuel supply comes from natural gasp whereby the Vwould ieircm case has about 50%
and 50* f(OM
an laying uplGibbons CrThis eek andkreplaci gkitscapacityewith
fuel fr natural uel fare attractive th
f f
s natural gas fired generation. the total en
99
Comparison of the average is useful togassesshthe short et rno impacts ofeRe
requirement of the Cities
various options, as well as to determine if the cash fgglow requirements of the
wit itching showsandtherepowerIng occurring ins1996. 4
selec fdthe five cases rpilthlfuelTsable 7 cost to th
e
each TABLE 7 }
AVERAGE SST TO SYSTF>!
f
Base Case - GCLN $46.35 $47.67 548.89 $50.91 $52.21 $52.68 $54.41
weirco Case
MA Operating GCLM $46.35 $47.36 $48.29 $50.11 $S1.40 $51.78 $53.48
PRO Coal - No Scrubber
Base Fuel Cost $46.35 $44.75 $45.53 $46.90 $48.62 $50.01 $51.84
3. PRB Coal - No Scrubber
! d' = Nigh Fuel Cost $45.35 $46.19 $47.01 $48.40 $50.17 $51.63 $53.55
Rep oar Olinger 3 b Dar►sby 1
` d ay UP Gibbons Creek $46.35 546.95 $47.47 $49.20 $50.59 $51.48 $52.91
L
Purchase Power
Lay up Gibbons Creek $46.35 $56.81 $56.27 $57.14 $58.19 $58.65 $59.80
The results eey track theeearly years ofwith theestudy. Oneeinteresting
being the lowst cost over ens Creek Case has a lower KPV than the
ir~~, observation is that, while the. Lay UO Gibbons
1`~yC.' base case. case, the average cost in the early years is higher than the 1.
~~+d, : This indicates that the savings free the Lay Up Gibbons CreE;C'Ste actually occur i
. 16,
in the later years of the study as oppose to in the short tc;s.
f.resrndatton~
' eased on the above
o ions storage
which are moreoattractive then i lacingrthe GiDbonshCreek are Plantv
~and replacing its output with natural gas fired capacity. it is therefore
recauaended that this option be given no further consideration.
4-2
J
1
FIN
Based on this study the conclusion is that a conversion of Gibbons Creek Plant
j to utilization of PAS fuel has significant economic advantage, both in the long
term as evidenced videnced by ale conet st present comparisons. calculation and in the short term as
by
It has been previously discussed that certain areas of the cost projections for
FRB are conservative in nature. Specifically capital costs for conversion were
included for some boiler modifications which may, in fact, not be required.
Additionally, the studies were based on a maxima gross generation of 437
megawatts, while the Power Production staff believes that substantially higher
capacities may be reached when the fuel limitations caused by the low Btu GCLii
fuel are removed.
In order to fully evaluate the proposed fuel switch, it is necessary that an
initial extended test burn of FRB fuel be undertaken. This initial burn would
' identify any 'fatal flaw' which may make burning 100k PRB impractical. The test
E burn would also allow data gathering to determine the actual maximum gross
! capability of the unit when firing PRO fuel and to determine the necessity and
cost effectiveness of some of the boiler modifications which have been included
in these analysis but may not be required. This initial test burn would require I
306000 to 35,000 tons of FRB coal and would last approximately one week. t
Following successful completion of the test burn, numerovs activities will be
required to complete a conversion to PRO fuel. A rail loop and fuel unloading
} + facility will need to be engineered, permitted, and constructed. The current
py,Y?~~s+ 4,, plan is to route the rail loop over the existing truck dusp and utilize the truck
du~xp and rapid discharge bottom dumping cars during construction of a rotary car
unloader. This would allow the conversion to take place prior to incurring
ifia substantial penalties in the Gibbons Creek !tine when mining at increased depths ,
In the A2/3 Blocks, while allowing the economies of a rotary car operation for
the long tern. it is anticipated that the truck dump would be used for a period j
of less than one year.
v k
} I. The critical path of completing the conversion for initial deliveries received
r I through the truck d is design/permitting of the rail loop. Prior to applying
1 d
on the necessary to
loop, to cmpwilete
anylpermit application 9 an
for a permit aseline studies it
b
n' Ideally, these activities should start very soon to support a construction
;.t schedule during 0a suer of 1995 during the dry periods of the year. Ii is
estimated that the maximum expenses for such activities prior to the January
Board meeting would not exceed ;200,000 (:1,600,000 estimate total engineering
costs).
f 2 ^ f
Egture Pgnr Supply Options:
The A-Jency has solicited and received proposals for facilities or contracts to
meet its future power supply needs. The request was structured to provide the
rr respondents with Aggency loads and resources which allow them to select the best
fit of their facilities and our needs.
,r
4 3
' ~til.a 'F
r
(('r
pd
-100-951
I
' pts.r Matti
1
r ,2W%
i
Prcposais were received from six entities who proposed 14 different future power
III supply options. Among the options were several which allowed for Agency
ownership of the facility, as well as some which allowed the Agency to acquire
ownershlp of natural gas supply for the life of the project through a reserve
purchase prior to operation of the plant.
+ Burns & McDonnell currently is'evaluating these proposals. They are also
developing cost estimates for construction and operation of Agency owned future 1
r veneration facilities. The most attractive of the 'purchase from others' and the
build it ourselves' options will be studied in the depth of detail similar to 1
err the methods used for the fuel switch and lay up studies. It is anticipated that
1 these evaluations will take an additional 60 to 90 days to complete. At that
ay» I point, a final report and recommendations on future power supply will be issued.
,
G
y r
41
r f~R.s ~t , r
X03 4! rt y ^ ~ .
.1titr
oil
A~
`L+
c 5
r 9~ 7. +1 ,~J. 5d ft
1
° r
yr
1. g ~j t~ i~ I +
r + ,
,A
P dN ,o I 4 4
Ib 1\ ~
111 7. i
t
S'tlN M
~.F
1
p 1
xr a i s e P t yA a y s i r r. ~ M1~ s t w, i n
A P~F ~~LS r rkih. E" `fit T..~~~s A +~1 x;• G'~ a >
,P _V4
• ~ # ~5't`.~~~s~~~„ ~ ~ '111('' r
i
i
7
1'1 W~r~A,NI a'~'iw°1~'~+ fiW Or OCII 91
t}
UMS6
'9 UMM p" %a o.
41
ml*cm
40
" ><w c r.ar
i
t
PION hT,
+ x 's Y r ~ 0.
r ,
1 1 a k ~a r 5~" ~ ; Ca" ~ I v"
arison
1 1 1 / / 1 1
. 1 1 1 1 1 / 1
/ 1 1 1 /
/ 1 1 1 1
Y/00 OMy RR
1 1 / / 1 t
'
1 1 • / 1 1 1 J~
1~ 1 1 • 1 / 1 a'
{ ur.. •.p.••... u~•...• ' ..u• ' ...•..•.0...• r.•. 7.....••..
~ 1 1 1 1 1
i r~~ 1 1 1 1 1 / 1
1 1 1 / 1 1 ♦ 1
~J ye.: 1 / 1 / 1 1 ~4 r
L. • •...•.•p......u 1........ r.u a r.. 1 WB 1* c
e Fr 1 / 1 / . 1
/ 1 1 1 • 1
p t~ J 1 i'~;~. • 1 1 1 1 1 1
. . 1 , , / l~tyw*r
1 1 • 1 1 • 1
• 1 1 1 1 1 1
~ 1 1 1 1 1
f 1 1 / 1 1 1.
~ 45 • •••1........ r•••.....
1 1 1 / 1 1 •
• / 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 • '
/ 1 1 / 1 / 1
lo~
i C J
1 d y~yp
i
1
I
aLr ~
I~
AYY I
~41Atti
I~ II ~ "I~~In I ' ~Sl~v+a; n~ ' ~ ~ ~b n' ~YB~'~°x~ fir' ~ y~C`~r i•. aP.~i~y'(~v,~~ ' '
♦~4 ~app Y,11' VY1-N Y~' s y~.., i'~C~u l r ~y 6 ~p
nk e
. go
'.1 A l I:: 1 I , 1 I 1
' 1~ ° ~z C , 1 1 1 I I I 1 1
1 ~ I'1 1 1 1 I ~ I I 1 1 I ~
i i 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 t
I, i ~y l a 1 f 1 I I t 1 1 I 1 1
~ ~ X° 4~ Y y~ 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 t 1
ym b~ I~ A I 1 f 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I
~ , B~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 f I' 7
,4' •ti; 1 1 1 1 I 1 I , I 1 '1 't t I,j F
I > 1 J 7 I 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 .t. 1
1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I/1'. t +~y•k~'
, ~ t '.1 l # 7 I I I / 1 1 : 1 1 1 I / { 1 :wY, ?
(n Av ~ 1 f~ 1 7' f I 1 1 I'1 1 1 I 1 / I 7 f4.
, ' ~ ~ii. 1 1 1 1 1: I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. i 1 f; _ i
d,7[ R~ I } I I I I I I I , '1 1 I / t a ,
f l• u ~ •.l I # 1 1 I 1 I I ! 1 1 1 J `7l [ 1 1
e, WI W4f 1, I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 " 1 1 11 q
' 1~ww~w.. / 1 1 I I 1 1 t ! ''1 1 3 ~t
x~♦~. 1 1 +1 T 7 ~ t .fA d'"/ .i f X'I C Wf9.
' ~ 1 I I 1 1 1 f
Daft R L,,~~,,~ p,,~.w.~ 1 I 1~ r t n I i 1 q 4 v~ 1 ~5 w. ~
y p~,•rw'r'u'f 1 1 1 f 6 i" sin ~n, v +ISt a q .aa'b
x 4' 1t v r °Gee.,1.'~~I l ny~ 1 t^~~ 3+t4~q 1 r r'r..
1 f Il 1~',F'~~I, wv ''.1 F"fl,("~~~`• aR ~ a~r~, 1< r~/~+~l,~s~', i~:;~1
c f>I mAw,t`x! .t IiK °P^F4 * Y~ hr M '
Bb*mwft
MIYIa~'.~Wi! ~ ° 1 fie. ~ s h 1Dw,q f
• ~y~.y ~1f s_ " r 1'` Ltj{ ~ ~'q~i~f i ®f ~ ` yA~.~py ;
13,001"
•n+~r ~y1Rlw r,
two IIm
• f
rv'Ni:R.MI Y911/arrA.'~,...1.4 w4'wwl.^^4 n..r.+..arli4i.~ i I..n • ~ . -
1
1
I
f
i
p ~
e
~ i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
9/13/44,
w i
u ~
i
,
rf
1.
r
r
b
y~+....... r,vr., u•s .uw1. ci . . ~ e r ..rr'. rd. 1.
r
:xW
r ~ ~1
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
September 13, 1994
t..r
Executive Session of the City of Denton City Counoil on Tuesday,
September 13, 1994 at 5:15 p-mq in the Civil Defence Room of City
Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas, at which the following items
will be considered:
5:15 p.m.
1. Executive Sessior:
A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071
1. Consider action in the matter of the appeal of the
decision of the TNRC in the application of Bolivar
Water Supply Corporation for an amendment to CCN
No. 11257= Docket Nos. 9824-C and 9447-C of the
Public utilities commission.
2. Consider claim: of Jennifer Owens.
B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVtT CODE Sea. 551.072
C. Pernonnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE
Sec. 551.074
F Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
September 13, 1994 at 600 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of
City Hell, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
items will be considered:
i
NOTE: An item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may
also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Session.
6:00 p.m. r
r
1. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction
on the Employee ones paarP i~r~ion by City employees ein ort
he
Executive Summary ry P
Health Risk Assessment.
2. Receive the use of l Lalr discussion
funds i for a Science La:nddL direction
3. Hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding
solicitation from the roadway.
{ 4. Receive a report concerning Council Committee Affiliations.
Special Called Session of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, September 130 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following
items will be considered:
7:00 p.m. ► ,
1. Pledge of Allegiance f
row
city of Denton City Council Agenda
September 13, 1994
Page 2
oZ KY
2. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular Session of
July 5, 1994 and the Sp9cial Called Session of July 12, 1994.
3. Citizen Reports
A. Receive a Citizen report from Larry Brown regarding the
` claim of Jennifer Owens and its handling.
4. Receive the Denton Airport Master Plan.
51 Consider approval of a resolution adopting the Airport Layout
Plan showing the extension of the existing runway to 7,500
feet and a proposed 5,000 feet runway lying 700 feet west of
and parallel to the existing runway.
6. Public Hearings
i
A. Receive a final report, hold a public hearing and
consider adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 36
(Zoning) of the Code of Ordinances try adding a new
Article X regulating and restricting the height of
structures and objeoto of natural growth, and otherwise
~-1 regulating the use of property in the vicinity of the ;
Denton Municipal Airport by creating the appropriate
zones and establishing the bounlariss thereof; defining
certain terms; referring to the Denton Municipal Airport
Zoning Map; providing for enforcement; including a
provision for severability; and imposing penalties for
violations. (The Airport Advisory Board and the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval.)
i
7. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval
thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations.
Approval of the Consent Agenda authorises the City Manager or his
designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations. The City Council has received background
information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding
these items prior to consideration.
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-
up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items e.A,
$.B, B.C). This Asting is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow
Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of
the Consent Agenda. Upon the receipt of a "request to speak" form
from a citizen regarding an item on the Consent Agenda, the item
shall be removed and be considered before approval of the Consent
Agenda.
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
z
14 Bid 41653 - Hood Utility Poles
4
e
i`
ro" per`
rr~.
City of Denton City Council Agenda f
September 13, 1994
Page 3 „ /sue
2. Bid 11655 - Disposal PCB Equipment & Debris
3. Bid 11658 - Roof Top HVAC Senior Center
4. Bid 11660 - Cement, Lima and Aggregate
5. Bid 11663 - Gasoline and Diesel
6. Bid 11664 - Emergency Preemption System Expansion
(OPTICOM)
7. Bid 11661 - Repair Feed Watex Heater Z
S. Bid 11666 - Janitorial Services
j 9. Bid 11669 - Canopy and Foundation For Warehouse
10. Interlocal Agreement - "rAPA - Electric Meters
B. Plats and Replate
11 10 Preliminary plat of the FUF Addition. The 94603
acre site ie located on the northeast corner of I-
35 and U.S. Highway 77.
8. ordinances
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive
bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materiels,
1 equipment, supplies or services. (7.A.1. - Bid 11653,
K 7.A.2. - Bid 116551 7.A.3. - Bid 116581 7.A.4. - Bid
11660, 7.A.5. - Did 11663, 7.A.6. - Sid 11664)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive
bids and providing for the award of contracts for public
works or improvements. (7.A.7. - Bid 11661, 7.A.8. - Bid
116660 7.A.9. - Bid 11669)
Co Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City '
Manager to execute an interlocal agreement with the Texas
Municipal Power Agency to authorize participation in the
purchase of various electric motors. (7.A.10.)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance adopting the budget for
the City of Denton, Texas, for the fiscal year beginning
on October 1, 1994, and ending on September 300 1995. 77
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance levying the ad valorem
tax of the City of Denton, Texas, for the year 1994, on
all taxable property within the corporate limits of the
City on January 1, 1994, not exempt by lawl providing
revenues for payment of current municipal expenses, and
for interest and sinking fund on outstanding City of n
Denton bondsl providing for limited exemptions of certain y
homesteadsl providing for enforcement of collections) and
i providing for a ssverability clause.
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the schedule
f of electrio rates.
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the schedule
of rates for water service.
~'Wr
4
uitY of Denton
page 44 130 199ty Council Agenda
AglM{8S1eAl,
Consider adop
I' of rates forwastewa wastewater an $n °erinalCa. nce amending the
Consider ado ache
residential ton of
as autho and cO~+arcisl Ordinance a g
the CitYror d by Chapter Z4 Of sanitation he C colle!ni rate,
the of et on aer
use of the cit;
YIS and amend, the of Ordinances
d. sanitary rates-char
. Consider an ordinance landfill. qe~j I
be transterred from fh~ ablishi
eneral tuna of the Cit electri i urld street
g rental fee
rave
K' Consider adopt
f Tra aAort t j°ta or 4 n ordnnancai euthoria
90 on for greAaa t with the Tex anAeth0 ,
Revolution funding of altoYnattve fit
fuels,,
Consider approval
capital Za of a rem
Texas, provament pr olution approving
°9ra~ for the Cit.V 0 1995-99
10. Conrirer
the noatnating a votir Denton, '
y Contek en~onai League of ~9 and altern
e• Cities ate Annual Cc voting delegate
d 11. Consider a egress to
Ad us e0tSor to of Citiba
taent and the approve the
13. %'isi°n Update Sign g,~ard of Appeals. Chairr of the Board of
13. NSece
llaneour matters
14. official from the city
Action manager.
on Executive se,:rton iteaat
Batters
C, Real Es
D. p°rROnnelte
a Board
iS. ~ppointeents
New Eusinesr
This itea
iteu for future egenklas section for Council Nemberr
r, 1d. rxecutive to ouggest
sessions
' 11.
Legal Natters
Un
Real der TEX. spy,
tstats T CODE Sec.
Under TEX. COyr 651.071
C' $eCsonnel/board a T CGDE Sac,
$51.074 ppointranta 551.072
` Under TEX. WI
,,'s T CODE
. tart rwr*
al
City of Denton City Council Agenda S
^ September 13, 1994
Page 5 37F
NOM THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT To Ala70URN INTO
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME RLGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS
LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meetlng vas
posted on the
bulletin board at, the City Hall of the City of Danton, Taxes, on
' the day of
, 1994 at otolock {a.ro.}
CITY SECRETARY
NOM THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS PIMA DISABILITIES ACT.' THE
z<<>ti' CITY WILL PROVIDE 61GN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS' FOR THE
HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS6114,
IN ~
ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETINOd PLEASE CALL THE SECRETARYJ'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMKUNICATIONS
DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO p
THAT A SIGN UNGUA09 INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUdH F
THE CITY SECRETARY,19 OFFICL+.
'ACC0020B
i
k
p
f pro.
.
OUNCIJ"I
u f
1
~ f t f
r
~a a;Z Y+ 1 i 1 .I F r
ttt Y r y a
j.+ d rte'+1 + =J
r[ y r 4 f" + ~ ~ Y ~ ~♦Q
a ♦ 5'i qi
r
Y. 1
♦
M
1
rm w~
DATE: September 13, 1994 / A~SD
CITY COUNCIL REPORT wj
WORK SESSION
I TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Lloyd Harrell. - City Manager
' FROM:
SUBJECT: City Employee's Wellness Program - Corporate Wellnets
1 Report - Executive Summary
y` MQQMHENDATIQN.L
It is the staff's recommendation that the City Council accept the
Corporate Wellness Report, - Executive Summary (Attachment i)
outlining the results of employee participation in the Health Risk
Assessment program for 1994. It is also the staff's '
recommendation that the Council authorize additional funding of
X31096 from the 1993/94 Budgeted (health insurance accounts) to
cover the additional participation by employees over the estimated
first year program budget
r .';y
I
SUMMAR
~'~"f?<1 The City Council authorized the Health Risk Assessment,as a part
of the Employee Wellness Prograte in the 1993/94 Budget. A i_X voluntary Health Risk Assessment for employees was identified as
the priority focus for the first year of the Wellness Program.
Dynamic Health and Performance, Inc, was the successful bidder and
10.
Administered the Health Risk Assessment (HRA) during April, May,
end June, 1£+94 ;
Based on a strong marketing and communication effort by the 4
members of the Employee Wellness Committee, 448 employees (over
62% of the workforce) received n comprehensive health risk
assessment. This included an .individual, confidential follow-up
meeting with a nurse and an individualized, confidential`Health
4,1 and Wellness Report. This employee report outlined the employee's
level of health and wellness in areas that research and stud have
shown to be the most critical risk factors. Each report further
provided detailed recommendations on how to improve one's risks.
A survey conducted of employee participation in the HRA indicates
that over 96% of the employees view all sections of the program as
s "good" or "excellent" (see Attachment II).
A summary of the employee evaluation comments are shown in
Attachment III. Clearlys most all employees who participated have
gained valuable insight and have been motivated to address areas
of their personal health and wellness.
}
cps
WIWI
•a
i~ t~O(hhtlo 9 ~
i September 13, 1994
CH Report to City Council - HRA - Corporate Wellness Report
k Page 2
- i A make-up session was held in July, 1994 for employees who were
unable to participate in the first scheduled sessions. Seventeen
(17) additional employees participated in this session and are in
the process of receiving their follow-up meetings with a nurse and
individualised reports. Those results were not available for the
City's Corporate Wellness Report discussed here..
Tito City received a comprehensive, detailed Corporate Wellness
Report - Group Summary and departmental sorted reports for more
focused analysis by department managers. !
The attached Corporate Wellness Report-- Executive Summary
provides an overall view of the City's state of employee health
and wralness based on the group of initial participants.
The report indicates that the major health and wellness hazards
anet associated contributing risks factors for City employees (who
participated in the HRA) as a whole. The key areas for our group {
1. Cardiovascular:,
o High total cholesterol - 49.4%
o High LDL cholesterol - 41.2% r 4
o No regular exercise - 73.4%
,{s o Xxcessive weight - 42.3%
o High 'coronary risk - 46.3%
Cat+carf
o Tobacco use - 26.4%
o High fat diet - 3563%
o Low fiber diet - 65.3%
y o Excessive weight - 42.3%
Accidents:
o DoitsnIt'wear seat belt - 24.6% a
o Drinks and drives occasionally - 18.3%
4. Lung Diseases
o Smoking..
o No regular exercise 73.4%
iz E
6. Diabetes:
' o Excessive weight - 42.3%
. 1r t;
6. Cirrhosis, Livers
o High risk drinking - 4.3% M
1". d
l' 1 t ,F
a !
5
alb,
i
}
VOL
September 13, 1994
CM Report to City Council -
Page 3 HHA - Corporate Wellness Report
An anal;isis of the information shows that overall our employees'
mafor risk factors are related to:
o Diet and
o Exercise
By improving in these two areas, we can begin to correct and
eliminate some significant other contributiAg risk factors such as
high blood pressure, high cholesterol, high fat diets, low fiber
diets, excessive weight, etc.
In fact, iaany employees who participated in the HRA have already
begun corrective actions. There has been an increase in employees
I on exercise programs at the North Lakes Recreation Center.
Several employees have Joined the TWU Wellnes Center o other
local fitness facility. Many employees havesundertakenrweight
reduction hrograme,
The Executive Summary also highlights three other important areas
x " of information.
First, by improving in the areas identified, we have the
to add, on average, 8,2 potential
employee, years to the average life expectancy of an 1
Second, and even more useful for the City, are the Recommended
Realth Actions. These form the basis for directing our
4ducational and awareness funding in the 1994/95 Budget if
approved by the Council. An,], with the funding recommended in the
budget for the Employee Wellness Program, we can address from 72%
89% of participants' health and wellness problems:
o Weight reduction (891 of
o Fitness/exercise party ip
program (73, of participants)
o Nutrition awareness program (72% of participants)
a Finally, and probably the moat revealing information, is the
section on the Economic Impact of Hajor Health Risks. This
section places a dollar value (from substantive, valid research)
on each recommended health action. With just 26% of the employees
demonstrating improvement in the risks outlined, the City could
realize a potential savings of about $85,000. Some of the
risks would require a longer probl
period of cholesterol and excessive weig t. But time to correct, like high
f awarenesG and seeing many participants beginning ntogaddresaesoMe
of the risks has made significant improverenta in our employees'
morale, productivity, and attitudas.
We are anticipating that in the next budget year, with Council
f
approval of our recommended funding, we'll see most participating
ti
~W
i
1
Septenber 139 1994 Y
CH Report to City Council - HRA - Corporate Wellness Report
' Page 4
employees return for a second year's HRA. We're also anticipating
an increase in new, voluntary participation as more employees see
their colleagues benefit from the Employee Wellness Program.
i
FRQrL&U_t QEPARTMRNTS 4B OROUPS AIMCTBD:
The Vmployee Wellness Program is available on a voluntary basis
for all regular full-time and part-time employees in all City
departments.
FISCA,4 IlLV&U
The 1093/94 Wellness Budget authorized by City Council was
"t =19,000 and was based on a Health Risk Assessment estimated
cost of 125 per employee. Our budget estimate was also based
on participation rate of 80% of employees (set by Wellness
Committee members).
The coot for tSe Health Risk Assessment by Dynamic Health and
Performance, Inc. is a graduated fee schedulot for up to 450
Participants - $46.00 per employee; for all over 450
` .'r partiolpants - 143.00 per employee. ! a+.
r? With ovor 65% of the employees participating, the current i
authorised 119,000 budget is not sufficient. We are
" requesting an additional allocation of 13,096 to cover the
additional employee participation and some miscellaneous
expenses used in marketing, communicating, and administering
the program. We are recommending that this additional amount
ar' come from the current health insurance budget with the lower
cost of placing onr insurance with Harris Methodist
(approximately =201000). ,
es tfu WItubmit
Ll y V. Harrell
City Manager
r, k
Pr pare bye !
{
onas Uck
Director of Human Resources
Y`
corDldll.!!
a
ntA~~r7~%S~akt+tzelia.rtn a,<L s, e, r..!< t;. ....yw4 "Y
Y
f
,a
~ F
n ,
~ ln.r%di ~1~B:nKNn R, .yhf r.. xa px ..r.•.i-er _ r f,. ~
171
10
AQI~Qtib-
i
i
-foe
fi
I
e
n r.
At
ATTACHMENT I
,~{{,+f. W nL r
Nf,t r h: ..~L
I
yr _
L ~ ! 1
Ir ♦ ~
9
rL
4
}
..i.. . _ r.n t..:.,.... ....a ..y.-f.L..M IR~aa:e.}4.~,. ~ - ai1~
:~~"W'''"pL+?•^.ti.r.rrw wutr~'lie;..Prr f4<. r~
~4 ~.f % fig ~ irv l•5
■
Corporate Wellness Report L1iY ~ =ti1f;'t
Ap" 1999 JUN 21 kn 0 43
r ~
Executive Summary
r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
1 ' f
It11 r ~ y~.
V L 1
1 ~
06.09.1994
f ` Provided : tli•'.
CITY OF DENTON WELLNESS PROGRAM
AND
F
' DYNAMIC HEALTH & PERFORMANCE, INC.
l .
(214) 991-6233
F
OIL
c°!!" I w by wob"V Mw dcwwr" O"M FI raY uwvbc I~I
~p
.
a. a. Arf~.i ~Y'3s~L`i::~i'OlM~~~i✓^'. . S 4
M air
If S
Corporate Wellness Report
~enQaka
--~1pw►Aaften
ftuWve esSummary Report Oast
This report summarize~lWellnessProfi a (PWP) health assessmentoprogram. Grouplhealth needs
completed the Person
' and risks are presented along with reoommendationsfof initiating risk reduction and health
enhancement programs. This data is very helpful in planning for a comprehensive health
ization.
organization.
an
our 9
enhancement program in your
livi a healthful lifestyle, much can be done to prevent serious 1
I Health Practices Y ~ t
illness and premature death. Recently, the U.S. Taskforce on Disease l
Prevention and Health Promotion delivered a report to the health care !
' providers of the nation. They stated that "the moste of disease
Interventions available to clinicians for reducing}
and disability in the United States are those that address the personal
health practices of patients, 11
The PWP Executive Summary Report hlghr~ghts those personal health
Group Nerds practices of this group most closely associated with high risk for
disease and premature death. The most likely leading causes of
death and disabiRy for workers In your organization are shown. The
prevalence of each contributing risk factor is fisted, and the health and
economic impact commented on.
The impact of lifestyle is dramatically shown in the Health Practices
t ~evity and Longv.* report. Studies show that persons can add up to 11 or
choosing to follow good health
i more years to their life expectancy by c~ioos
~.ncy for this group is +
ed
practices. The potential for irxxeas life a>~~
~
shown.
The last section makes recommendations for specific interventions
onto
Risk ~
this ~ I Reduction organization
~
Actions reduce identified health problems In Yout Based
Information, specific goals can be set for reducing risks, enhancing
health and improving the productivity of your organization.
Demographics There were 447 individuals from your organization that participated in ,
this wanness assessment program. The upconnsist m~ahhn
and 147 women. The evorage age ohe gro
norms and comparisons used In this report are based on these
demographics.
The ethnl* mix vies 80.6% Caucasian, 6% Black, .2% Asian, 6%
Hispanic, 2.6% Native America 1e andrage owe was chose f
k
not to indicate their ethnicity.
Page One
r
i.
Y4 10f~
i
Corporate Wellness Report
Major Health Risky
Llfvbtyle The US Surgeon General's report on 'Health Promotion and Disease
Prevention" points out that hall or more of all leading causes of death
in the United States are caused by "lifestyle factors% Th s means that
making wise personal choices in health practices can significantly
decrease risk for disease while enhancing the quality O N&
o
Leading Health The most common causes of disease and death for par sons in your
Hazards organization are shown balow. Known contMuting risk factors for t
each disease and their pr6valence are shown. Reducing the number
of these major health risks can sign'ifioently reduce heath pfoblems
and health care costs while improving productUrty in yojr j
organization. '
1 f
Cardiovascular Contributing Risk Factors (n) M
(910,188 deaths/yr) Personal history of heart disease - -_11 2.5
Family history of heart disease 82 18.3
High total cholesterol OW madL et ibm) 221 49.4 ;
High LDL cholesterol 1130 mg/dt. or aGoa+f 134 41.2
Low HDL Ievel ps nV/dt or bolo,) 83 18.6
High blood pressure (t4o/go•nd&:)ml 95 21.3
Smoking 85 19.0
Diabetes or high blood sugar 11+5 mQ/dL ♦ l 30 8.7
No regular exercise 326 73.4
Excessive overweight 189 42.3
Abnormal ECG U OA
i High coronary risk _ 20% 46.3
Risk
conm
f (476,927 deaths/yr) PCoenM uti g o f i (n) 7 (96)
1.6
Tobacco use 127 28.4
tigh risk drinking Ovv Von 14/*N*) 19 , 4.3
High fat diet 158 35.3
Low fiber diet 292 65.3
Excessive overweight 189 42.3
Cancer waming sign(s) present 46 10.3
Blood in stool prose-et 6 1.3
Page Two
f
t
0• v.y,
anr~
i
I Corporate Wellness Report
I NO
Major Health Risks Continued... Lille
Accidents Contributing Risk Factors (n)
(95,020 deaths/yr) Doesn't wear seat belt all the time 110 24.6
No working smoke alarm In home 43 9.6
Drinks and drives occasionally 82 183
Does not use good lifting technique 54 112.1
Lung Disease Contributing Risk Factors
(78,380 deaths/yr) (n)
Smoking 85 19.0
I Low lung function tFEV i < on of pwk ) 0 0.0
No regular exercise 328 73.4
Unusual shortness of breath 20 4.5
Persistent hoarseness or cough 10 2.2
Diabetes Contributing Risk Factors (n) %
(38,532 deaths/yr) O
Personal history of Diabetes 14 3.1
High blood sugar level pis mo/a.or sbow) 24 : 5.4
Excessive overweight 183 1 42.3
Clrfious, Lhrer CnnMbutanq Risk F&cMra
(2t3,201.deaths/Yr) 01)
l High risk drinking fm, fM 14/wm*) 19 4.3
E
I
Page Three
,.w.
ANN
! Corporate Wellness Report
! berrdaNo
~fi 6alt _
Major Health Risks Continued...
! Other Key Health Practices (n)
Lower nutritional status 320 71.6
Heavily stressed (a+ have o-a,we coons) 15 3.4
! Numerous stress signals present (9 or more) 22 4.9
j Not vtvy happy with life 52 11.6
Low In deep (Na man 7 hours per day) 161 36.0
Low energy level o"i trod mw me mv) 80 17.9
Have no good social support system 30 6.7
! Drink heavily (more VW tt dMka per weer) 19 4.3
Uses drugs monthly to after mood, relax or sleep 50 11.2
Drinks heavily of caffeine (a of mws serNnpe per day) 43 9.6
{ Health Age Summary
! Ofte's choice of health practices has a signM, cant effect on health and
longevity. In a prospective study of some 7000 people for 15 years, people
who followed a healthy lifestyle lived some 11,5 years longer than those with
I poor health practices; smoke, sedentary, poor eating habits, overweight etc.
The health practices of persons in your organization were compared to this
study population to determine the effect of their lifestyle on longevity.
t ( Average Health Achievable PotirMal Years I
Aye Age Age of Added Life
38.3 40.8 32.3 3650,0
The average person In this group could add 8.2 years to their We expectancy
by Improving health practices. For the entire group of 447 people, over 3650
• person years could be gained. Adding these person years would be
I
1
~ invaluable. People would feel better and be more productive all the years of
their We.
;
i
MMk*t Cm Summary -r- (n) {96)
6 or more office visits to doctor last year 72 16.1
Sick and missed work 7 or more days last year 62 13.9
Spent 1 or more days In hospital fast year 37 8.3 1
Page Four
j ! wrreeewe.~a..ae
goo
wue,~
r own
r
ran
i Corporate Wellness Report
gpaotfaHa f
Recommended Hesith Actions -
Based on the prevalence of health risks identifled In persons in your org ization, the
following health actions are recommended:
1. Welght reduction program (89% of participants are over their ideal weight range).
1 Weight control is a commonly felt need. By losing or preventing excess weight, risk for
heart problems, cancer risk, hypertension, diabetes, and other serious health problems s
can be prevented. Losing weight can also have a positive effect on self Image.
2. Fitrtese/exercise program (73% at participants have no regular exercise program).
Regular exercise Is a positive lifestyle practice heIpi !
ng prevent many serious health
problems, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, osteoporosis. It also
helps ease tension and generally builds energy, self worth, and motivation for other
' healthy practices such as not smoking and better nutrition. A good fitness program can
form the foundation for a good health enhancement program.
i
3. Nutrition awareness program (72% of participants show need for making nutritional
changes). Good nutrition is a positive health step towards preventing heart disease,
cark-,er, obesity, osteoporosis, and improving general health and resistance to disease.
4. Cholesterol control program (53% of participants had high total cholesterol or LDL
cholesterol levels). Lowering cholesterol levels can significantly reduce risks for heart
disease. For every I % cholesterol Gs lowered, the risk for heart disease drops by 2%. A
program of nutritional education, dietary counseling and modical referral Is needed for
i these Individuals.
6. Coronary risk reduction (46% of participants have a high coronary risk rating.) These
Individuals are high risk due to multiple risk factors, current symptonvi, or a personal
history of heart problems. Emphasis on reducing overag coronary risk and a systematic
program to build heart health is always important.
' S. Cancer awarerms prograim (23% of participants have higher cancer risk). These
indivi"s could make lifestyle changes to significantly reduce their cancer risk. The
r ~
National Cancer Institute has stated that most of all premature deaths from cancer could
r be prevented by lifestyle. Good nutritional habits atone could prevent up to 35% of all
cc ricer deaths.
5
Page Five
t
s
~Nr
I Corporate Wellness Report
I 'de?-
Recommended Health Actions 01N
7. Blood pressure control (21% of participants had elevated blood pressure levels).
Reducing blood pressum is a proven effective way to reduce risk for cardiovascular
disease and Increase longevity. Much can be done to control high blood pressure
through lifestyle changes and medications. Regular opportunity for blood pressure
checks, education programs and medical referral are needed to decrease this problem.
1 S. Smoking cessation program (+9% of participants are smokers). Smoking cessation
signifi wtly reduces health risks send health care expense. Smoking is the most
preventable cause of premature deith in the United States.
9. Back care/Ititing education (12% of participants do not know or practice correct lifting
techniques to protect the back). Back injury is a major cause of injury and medical
expense for most organizations. Education and training programs in lifting and back care
would be beneficial for all.
10. Alcohol awareness (4% of participants repot drinking heavily, 14 or more drinks per
week). High levels of drinking lead to high mo dent rates, decreased job performance,
and serious heath problems including cirrhosis of the fiver and increased cancer risk.
Alcohol awareness and referral for help for thost, dependent upon alcohol can have a
significant Impact on the health of these ind'Mdua's.
11. StrNs management program (3% of parti ipants are bothered by excessive stress
problems). ExtessAre stress or poor coping ability can lead to disease of body and mind i
intruding ulcers, tension headaches, back problems, depression, and decreased job
satisfaction and performance. Learning good stress management techniques can help
people deal better with this common problem before it causes serkws problems.
11
1
1
1 page
P
~wwwnd
it ~ ~ ~
l1.
J(y
I~/MIIA
f
Corporate Wellness Report
Economic impact of Major health =k-s
an
expenditure is 1196 of the Grass Nat+onal Product, mar~;~e than
The National Health care wellness
$2000 per person per year. With this raPnte rested
~ inithe fin -al sav ngs that ~g
l untry, many organizations are keenly
can provide. Over two-thirds of all rising companies costs, Feedback from corporatellness ~
programs and safety programs to help curb these fast by reducirry health risks. it has increased 1
surveys have revealed significant cast saving
lost time from sickness.
productivity and job satisfaction, while decreasing k)St work time per year than
an employee that smokes has 3.5 more di
For example, y a from fire and aoxident loss.
non smokers, w% higher illness rates, a e Increased e eta Per year.
- $400 or Thus the typical smoker costs his employ
potential savings) associated
summarized in this report are the YOKI r e~Omlc costs (or rograms are
with maW health risks found in this group. Recommended health action programs
or estimate based
from health
listed in order of their eaxtiomic impact. Values shown are an average
on published research (see references d 5 e~mplsar>ce with the risk rredudOn
1 care rOsts are shown for 100%. 50%,
i recommendations listed below
Estimated Potential Savings Based on Group Compliance
25%
I i > Compliance
;
t ~mpioyewl i 0096 ComPlance
Action
Hearth
i proq'ar»e at Risk ;Pik'
19f680
328 $ 78,720 $ $
n ! Regular exercise program 72450 ` 36,050 17,850
207' ,
coronary risk reduction 235 47,000 23,400 ` 11,600
16,800 8,400
cholesterot corw 01
85 34,000 7,920
smoking cessation 15,840 1
396 , 31,680
+ We+ght reduction 30,E ; 15,000 7,500
! Cancer risk reduction 230750 11,750 ? 5,750
95
Blood pressure contrd '3 19 15,960 r,5a~ 3,380 F
Ale" control l 5, 2,740
3 110 , 11,000 500 ;
Seat belts always worn 15 1,500 700 ; 300
Stress management 1360 171,960 $ 85,060
Potential savings ` $
' Page Seven
1
wntryu-
a
.
Mo .c4 • p
Ap*
r
t ;
ATTACHMENT II
I` f{
!'JE r t 1
rjf~I' h
K~ I ~ r 1 ~t r
'fN
C> t Y , G {Y 5,
d rt 1 S , ~ 'fir
Ira , ~ L
f
t ~ ~ Ate.
r
Ago
rtoo~
f
a~+va -o
CITY OF DENTON WELLNESS PR-
BVALUA 1994
TION SUMMARY
Orientation &
Scheduling ...................97% rated GOOD or EXCELLENT
Effectiveness
of Staff ...........................98% rated GOOD or EXCELLENT
i Value of Wellness
Report.... ..............to...........96% rated ()OOD or EXCELLENT
Visit With Nurse......... 98% rated GOOD or EXCELLENT
Overall Rating. 98% rated GOOD or EXCELLENT
i
f
^Y Should this wellness program oon&ue? 96~ said YES
3
r .
r
r
Number of employees referred to physici • '
an 33 ,
Number of employees rem
with nurses: wing follow-up
!
37
i
1
f
-
1
I
f
CITY OF DWMN WELLNESS PROG /1994
EVALUATION SUMMARY
} Total number responding = 251
EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR
Orientation
Scheduling 57% 40% 2%
(141) (99) (6) )
Effectiveness E
of staff
~ - 6496 3496 296 <S96
{ (159) (85) (5) {i)
Value of 60%
'Wellness Report (151) (90) 4 0
(10)
Visit with
Nurse 7146 27% 2% p }
i' (171) (67) (6)
oftiall 58%
296 p
g (144
(100)
Progam Continue?
_ . - YES NOT SURE NO
' j
969b 496 p
(2377) (10)
„ F
r a
YI~
i
wR+ 4 M, •rl GCb4n-y-
E,
{ Na {
i
Now
i
• DYNAMIC HEALTH & PERFOR C, Tfr grouting people, growing organizations
I -
ADDITIONAL BLOOD TEST RESULTS '
HEMA' Y[ )CRrT IN RANGE OUT OF RANGE
T= 447
91% 9%
(405) (42)
Hematocrit is a test which measures the portion of blood volume
that is made up by red blood cells and is most frequently used to
test for anemia.
ATP 93% 7%
T=447 (414) (33)
G07P is an abbreviation for a protein called an enzyme which
aids in various chemical activities within cells. Injury to cells ,
release this enzyme into the blood. Damage from alcohol, gall
R ' 'r bladder disease and a number of other diseases may be reflected in
,r
high values.
P e
PSA and Add Phosphatase
M 4%
(66) (3)* '
rr ,
x t Prostate Specific Antigen and Acid Phosphatase are tests for
prostate disease and prostate cancer. PSA is the newer, more
commonly used test. 'These two tests were inadvertently run on
" some employees. 4 One employee had an elevated PSA and two
employees had elevated acid phosphatase. All elevations were
slight.
6320 W k Y, &A
121. WAos, Temps 75240 • (214) 991-6233 • FAX (214) 9914802
' .w::r•1. Yt4 r..ygs r-arnus_. '^..N
r
•
E
AOI O f
~
f
ATTACHMENT III
f
f
a y p
t
' ~ ~il,~t..i jj~i~iyC..~'»..... . _....~_.w.w w.w •.wu.... - .~.en,a. L...-. s4ta~r-n,-n g
,
t
r.
f 4
WA
DYNAMIC HEALTH & PERFORMANCE, INC.
y~ growing people, growing organitariom
4
AP* Wo
WOW
A/j CITY OF TODENN LLNESS PROGRAM / 1994
SUMMARY OF EVALUATION COMMENTS
„ Cha~~alan to make or W~y~l w71 use thts information:
Exercise and eating habits.
Diet and exercise (This exact reaporse was stated by 7 different employees)
Eating habits.
Exercise and no snacks.
WM chant;e eating and exercise habits.
Leas fat intake-more exercisel
Smoking, diet
Diet
Work on cholesterol level & exercise/proper eating and sleeping
Must slack off drinking and watch diet.
Reduce fat and stress.
I Work on diet and exercise.
i Lose weight, change diet.
Exercise and stay away from junk foods.
Exercise (T'his exact response was stated by 7 different employees)
Adapt my diet, get more exercised Improve my wellness.
Lose weight and dietary changes
s Start exercise program. a to start and maintain an exercise program 2r3
. a
The, information presented encourages m times a week. (I knew I was lacking
in this area but seeing it on paper was helpful.)
Eat lower fatty foods and exercise.
i'r`'~, y psS Nm ordiet.
t•
Start exercise program.
wt For personal health care and exercise planning.
Begin c!,ercise progma. Start eating more healthy.
Change my diet to a mr,'re healthy one and exercise.
Increase physical activity and eat better.
f Eat lower amounts of fat, exercise more
Better my health
Mors exercise to reduce cholesterol level and weight
Watch my blood pressure
s.- Change diet.
Sce. Doctor
r Exercise more and cut down on snacking
6320 UU Freewvy. kite 121 + l)oilas Teals 7524017 11 (214) 9912233 + FAX (214)0914802
• r ' rn.. ,n..... . w M14 { i•bs r iJ•'f:'i'w LYw9.a. .n✓wM
v
MR~
are,.
9
• DYNAMIC HEALTH & PERFORMANCE, INC.
BTOUZng people, 8*ouing organizaticros
APW11A/i 154 FP
CITY OF DENPONLLNESS PROGRAM / 1994
SUMMARY OF EVALUATION COMMENTS
Cnan¢~~ ? ~+1An to make or waYS I will use rls's informat~4~
Exercise and eating habits. ?different em 1 es)
Diet and exercise (Phis exact response was stated by p
Eating habits.
Exercise and no snacks.
Will change eating and exercise habits.
Less fat intake-more exercise!
r Smoi diet
Diet eating and sleeping
Work on cholesterol level exercise/proper
and watch diet.
Must aleck off drinking
1 Reduce fat and stress.
Work on diet and exercise. '
Lose weight, change diet. E
Exercise and stay away from junk foods. E
Exercise ('Phis exact response was stated by 7 diffwellness.
rplo~s)
I Adapt my diet, get more exercises! Improve my Lose weight and dietary change.
Start exercise program. 2-3
The information presented encourages me to start and maintain an exercise program
times a week. (I knew 1 was lacking in this area but seeing it on paper was helpful.)
s f Eat lower fatty foods and exercise.
Change diet.
5` t t No more fat.
Start exercise program.
For personal health care and exercise planning.
i Begin exercise program. Start dating more healthy.
Change my diet to a more healthy one and exercise.
Increase physical activity and eat better,
Eat lower amounts of fat, exercis t more ;
Better my health
More erercise to reduce cholesten ►l level and weight
r.` Watch my blood pressure
Change diet.
See Dnc hti
Exercise t.>Jre and cut down on snac ins
214) 991.4902
, • (214) 991-0223 • FAx 1
6320 t9J Freewoy, Sutte 121 • Dorias Tenn 752
i
T.c IF+~
-cW
r U IRt~
A PA A 162 1
S 11K~ 1 plan to make or wa)2 I will use this Informa-tiom (Continued) .20
Better health
Plan to see my doctor as soon as I can
Continue on
Stay away from fats
Exercise & eat more fiber
Ill make an honest effort to improve my health.
Use weight.
Diet • leas fat.
Stop smoking & eat more breads and fruit.
tt~ Reduce fat in diet.
Work out more. i
More exercise & better diet
Gain weight
Lower fat - more fiber
more exercise, better eating habits
Lose weight
Exercise more and eat right
Start an exercise program
Change diet
Follow recommendaeons ,
Lower intake of fat
' Cut salt, start exercise >
Plan to lose weight, walk more, lift weights
. Lose weight.
~ '1Cfxangeeating.
I have already cut down on fat intake and 1 am exercising more.
t' To keep cholesterol down
Continue diet & exercise plan currently in use; Making improvements as desired
Lase weight, exercise . get rid of stress (my husband)
4 Get more exercise, lose fat
i It will help me be more aware of what I eat.
I have already started exercise and diet suggestions
Decrease fat intake/exerclso
I will use this information to begin an exercise program and improve my nutrition.
Reduce high fat foods; exercise more
More exercise, less fats -afore f ber - smoke less.
Increase exercise in order to ro,dtuv body fat - have cholesterol checked.
Follow the report
Eating more fruits and vegetables & more exercise
Eat more fiber, fruit and vegetables. Exercise more frequently.
Eat better / more exercise
Eat less fat, exercise, quit smoking
Exercise more and eat right
1. 9
i
1
t 1
.A ,f
'low
~n
"
l~ / O
AP*
ApgW
r ~
S"ges II plan to make or way; r will use this information: (tronnttmu 2
Aerobics (musleN watch fat accumulation
Exercise - Quit Smoking - Change Diet
To help with diet changes
More exercise, less fat in diet
i will :tart working on out of range levels immediately
Change diet - work on weight
I plan to follow the suggested recommendations.
Increase fiber intake, more breads & cereals.
I plan to live a healthier lifestyle and increase my physical activity.
Fast food consumption
To get in better physical condition
Diet, reduce body fat, continue exercise
I plate to exercise and change some of my eating habits
Eating & exercise habits
eating habits
To better my health
in worldng with strew and eating habits
To lower my body fat with diet and exercise
For health & safety
As r"umended
" taet into or back into physical fitness program
Eat leU fatty foods.
Eating and anclse habits.
Try to follow suggestions of nurse.
To improve the quality of nutrition
#ar good health, cut fat out
° Charge mel eating {
To give )n a fitness program to work in
Start wailing again.
y Measurment of my eating habits according to
Lower cholesteM, easy exercise
Reduca cholesterol and weight
Increase exercise
Eat better.
Start eating better foods.
Stop eating as much meat
Oo on s small diet, slow down on drinking
Set up nryseli a scheduling and stay with it
Control fat and sugar intake - begin light aerobic exercise
Started an exercise program and diet
Start exercisin& watch what I eat.
Improve my health
Better my health condition
t
t
~..w
MAI
Date
a (nformatlon! (Continued) e422
As a reminder to eat smart
and work out.
Consider an exercise program
Diet, weight
Exercise more
As a comparison in I year after exercising 3 X week
Exelcise more and cut down fat
c Recheck fats in the diet and begin a walking program
More exercise
'T'his has reinforced ray need for aerobic exercise
i plan to get healthier
Better eating and exercise more
it's a benchmark. w/hat would be the results a year from now?
Change diet and exercise more.
More exercise.
Sets Dr.
Watch my diet and start walking more.
Lure weight
Eitenlsa & lose weight
Change a few eating habits
I may exercise mote
eat right and exercise
` Mott exercise on a regular basis and better diet.
More exercise, better diet
V. Exercise more, "t better
Exercise more on a regular basis! .
1 Add smoke detector and lose more fat
s, Change Net, atop smoking pipes stop drinlsiag alcohol, stop rating eggs, exercise
` Not 4 this time
Start caaerclsing more & eeding less fat
Reduce body fat
&Ordse trore watch my diet
I More ex+:rdse, better diet
.w;
Improve dle.Veat breakfasdexercise
t , My dirt
Excrclse more, eat a more balanced diet, stop smoking - maybe
mom exercise & less fat
Lower body fat, eat less fat
' As prescribed
Lane boF•,y.fat
Diet
t . Unh"n at this thnei
Cut ot.t red meats
1
~1Ti~i NSJ~~'1M'ANIIY•
A7tiM
Apeiiddlo 9 '
AO" _
n~~ or deleted from tha oroua~ ~
Yes, the word obesity-
Diet planning
More cancer screening, overfatl... f
Offer fitness evaluations.
Programs to manage most common problems such as overweight,
Mora time.
Follow-up
print out a possible diet
Flgn'bility & strength
Follow-up blood test after 4b months
spouse not one
Tate three samples,
EiC(l fat measurements
Better body
Add Stress Test
Canoe trip, backpacking
k
l would like to be tested about twice a year,
foods should be added. y
{ `bdormatior On
into
Viand HRA ioanairts
Dekta department codes on quest
More assurance of confidentiality! {
Would like it to be available to whole families
Blood Work W co"er more
1
More extensive blood test
i
i , Fit: "wellness nurse
include all the blood work for everybody, to encourage work on needed i
Maybe attempt to start some support or activity groups
areas
Should be dory. every y of two
Byes acid bearing after this
Would hike to have follow-ups m may eventually lower our insurance
pntph4 that participation in a wellness progm
If we reach it, give
allenge employees to set a 300 or 500 aerobic mite exercise goal.
us a $23 0 Certtficate towards a new pair of athletic shoes
The prostate test was added to mine accidentally. 1 think it should be added.
More time with nurse
):ollow-up with nurse
Stress tasting
Check uric acrd
Add Pm for men over 4 ~ of mment and would be better
More privacy when
more privacy
Add spouses evaluations I
s i
NOW-
OMf
•
No, 9 -dad
APW
ShouldMthin¢ be added or deleted from t r,pIam? (Continu
SAcdule for fall -after summer
f anything, add more categories
Add dependents
Add dependents • spouses & children
i
SmvAured recommendations
ty; I
J
r
t r
At t
yi S
li ,?5 a. t
2 i
ter' a ✓
~ I
n
i
Grp V
•MUa«
ua
~q
I
ApanQal LAM
S"
you for caring.
We need the information - keep the program going.
I enjoyed it.
Great - hope to do it again to see if changes have helped.
Excellent program.
Appreciate the city doing this for its employees. I
` It all confirmed what I suspected
This is going to help me plan my future work/play habits Thank you for your helplll
Thanks for listening And the Information.
Thanks for the information.
This is definitely a benefit to the employee if they will use the information in a positive
matter.
Charlotte;om her job.
Thanks.
Staff very professional and friendly.
It's Great
Well donel 1
Nice people and firm 1
Thank you for providing this service.
Greatt
It possible, I would lice this survey be extended to family/spouses.
Thank you!
Very Informative
I This was extremely beneficial and helpful. The staff was very kind.
t Moro private room
Thanks for the Infol
I'll be curious, to we how I do neat year.
Look at method used to determine body rat.
This Is great - Please continue the progremll
Become more healthy
Eat less red meat
Fire Dept. Administration caused to rm:hedule several times. The evaluation didn't
seem to be very tdgh on their priorities for us
Very good program. We all need this.
Thank youl
Thank Youl I hope the program will oontinuel
Nurses were professional yet compassionate
k Good program but needs to review several samples.
I am glad the City has this program.
Very Goodl
We appreciate you guys
Thank you for clearing the meanings of these things for me.
Your helpers were very attentive
Good program
i
Lr
I
Apet~No i ~ 0
ApBOddi
Otite ! r~
Comments; (Continued)
The person doing the screening need not chew gum and blow bubbles wh screening.
1 think some of the criteria are a little hard to obtain in regards to exercise and diet.
Number of portions seem more important than size of portions on overall daily
consumption.
The stiff exMains and helps very good
I think this is a wonderful program - it will be of value to the employee and employer.
Thank youl
Good program.
i Another good program - keep it up
Thad you.
Great program
Very good Program
1 gained valuable personal health information to set personal goals.
Very good program
All of you do very good work.
Good program; Thank youl
Exeeileat appreciate program
These me the types of health issues we should be addressing.
1 had a good idea where l was health-wise, but this helps me see where 1 can improve.
This Is a very good program for an city employees
r' E Helpful
EEver as very helpful
Good prti
I thouurthe fat testis was not very accurate
'lyre ourses'who gave blood were not friendly ;
Good feedback i
Excellent program i
i think the awarene►_ our health can only be good.
Thank you.
Exoelknt prog=l I,
Excellent evaluation do screening
Exercise recommendations should include practical as well as enjoyable suggestions.
Practical routine exercise will enable individual to enjoy sporadic sports activities. 1
€ Very good
dim
Good idea Should be annual thing.
Oood job
Everyone very nice
i
COUN(
rw
d
+ I,
It
k ae e1 ~ I;v
a
s
f
o
i
r
1
r
AQ9Qddlt9ll(~..~,.,..,....
' &TY Of WNTOK TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201
MEMORANDUM
V t
rya x ;.t
*rl;
!a
DATE: September 7, 1994
r
k TO: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Mansger
Tr`
FROM: Harlan L. Jefferson, Director of Treasury G;,eratlons N
;IT
SUBJECT: SCIENCE LAND'S PROPOSAL FOR LALOR FUNDS y
%
Attached please find a co of a re ~~red b
copy proposal p p y 'jc'ence Land-Denton's
; f Discovery Museum. They are requesting Lakr funding under'"evo eligible categories.
The first eligible category is tourism (i.e., 05,800), and the second eligible category
is historic restoration and preservation (i.e., 11111 o760).
l ~
a ,r f S'', ,
rF ? Currently, we estimate that by the end of the 1993.94 fiscal year, approximately
f fi $146,000 will have been accumulated in the hotel/motel occupancy tax reserve fund.
The proposed 1994-96 budget utilizes 4124,180 of that reserve to replace the Civic
Center roof. We estimate that approximately 920,820 in the reserve fund will be
undesignated by the end of the current fiscal year,
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
1 I' I
s AtttKlrMn r1?
' ' y AFFOOBI!
1-
L 9
I N
v Ott ti ' f -
.
6171565-8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529
k
,
j
AV&No 9
Science Land -
Denton's Discovery Museum
1 September 7, 1994 of DENTOty
Golden Triangle Mall
The Honorable Robert Castleberry PA. Box 1338
Denton, TX 16202
Mayor, City of Denton 817.383-8686
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mayor Castleberry:
Attached you will find a specific proposal from Science Land - Denton's . This
i
pro Discovery Museum for ~mber of fundsugh March of 1995.ovIt Is based
month period from Septe 1
on meetings we have had with the City Council, City Attorney Drayovitch,
G and Treasurer Jefferson.
Mrs. Drayovitch and Mr. Jefferson have been most helpful in working with
us. We are also grateful to you and the numbers of the council f rcigiving ;
t museum is worthy y
e on.the;JW'nla. Wfa bellev ,that the
support =d•eligible- to, .,ceiv ands.
o Please note that the proposal includes a memorandum to you in response
` to your questions regarding raising admission fees to generate additional
+ income. Our -board of directors has carefully considered and continues to
investigate ways to keep Dcnton's Discovery Museum financially sound and
pulsed for future growth.
Res ectfully,
ltan C3regory (r?rn
rs
President of the Board oe o
t
4
1
AWULW -
DM*
aD
PROPOSAL
t and
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Prepared for:
DENTON CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Provided by:
Y '
SCIENCF, jAM
DENTON'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM
CONFEN'1'S:
L Proposal for Lelor funds
4 r x. 1994 Museum objectives
3. Long Range objutives for the museum
4. Summary of August board actions
S. Budget information
4
r b. Support material
F