Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-25-1995 • • 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET 4-25-95 • 1 I • • AGENDA QQ91Id8 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL DA19~ 557- S' ;S April 25, 1995 n Closed Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, April 25, 1995 at 5:15 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas, at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO CLOSED MEETING AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. 5:15 p.m. l.. Closed Meeting: A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071 1. Consider settlement offer relating to delinquent franchise fees owed the City by GTE. B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.072 C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.074 1. Discuss city Attorney finalists and consider offer of employment. Special. Call Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, April 25, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 U. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: A Work Session is used to explore matters of interest to one or more City Council Members or the City Manager for the purpose of giving staff direction into whether or not such matters o should be placed on a future regular or special meeting of the Council for citizen input, City Council deliberation and formal City action. At a work session, the city Council generally receives informal and preliminary reports and information from city staff, officials, members of City committees, and the individual or organization proposing council action, if invited by City Council f or City Manager to participate in the session. Participation by individuals and members of organizations invited to speak ceases when the Mayor announces the session is being closed to public input, Although Work sessions are public meetings, and citizens have a legal right to attend, they are not public hearings, so citizens are not allowed to participate in the session unless invited to do so by the mayor. Any citizen may supply to the City council, prior to the beginning of the session, a written report e regarding the citizen's opinion on the matter being explored. Should the Council direct the matter be placed on a regular meeting agenda, the staff will generally prepare a final report defining the proposed action, which will be made available to all citizens prior to the regular meeting at which citizen input is sought. The purpose of this procedure is to allow citizens attending the regular meeting the opportunity to hear the views of their fellow citizens without having to attend two meetings. i w o ,j~ • • y~ r 6:00 p. m. AgQi1SlaEts117~ 1. Presentation by John Hudson, President of the N.74m(~P; to the City of Denton Water Treatment Plant for Best Tasting Water in Texas. 2. Consider the process of appointing individuals to serve on a 1996 Celebration committee in conjunction with the esquicentennial year for Denton county and give staff s directio. 3. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding parking signs on the Square. 4. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding changes to the sound system in the council Chambers. 5. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding transit service to DFW Airport. 6. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an amendment to the current ordinance regulating the keeping of livestock in the City limits. 7. Consider a nomination to the Cable T. V. Advisory Board. 8. Official Action on Closed Meeting Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of (p.m.} 1995 at ----o'clock (a.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DE14TON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WTTH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN • ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY • SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. A00O026B • a a i ,h ra s 's. E CITY COUNCIL O ~ 'o► a~ o ° s Oy ~t C i • 4 Denton County Historical Commission April 3, 1995 The Honorable Bob Castleberry Mayor, City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry: 1996 Is the sesquicentennial year for the county of Denton which was formed in 1846 by the Texas Legislature. 1996 Is, also, the centennial year for the historic 1898 county cotAhouse- on•the-square. Planning for these two very special events is Importar# to all people of Denton county. The Denton County Pl f xicat Conxnission has a committee to help fonnulste and oordinate plans among the rnany groups across the county who will be a part d this special yew of celebration. Will you please provide assistance from your community by: 1, Form a 1996 Celebratlon Committee made up of people from your area who will enjoy wlorldng to plan end carry out special events in your town and pertk:Ipate with oournywlcfe everts 2. Choose a chairperson to guide that committee (this person will also represent your committee on the cournywkle committee) 3. Have the committee to meat and develop a list of poeelbie events for their community and a list of suggested countywide events, 4 We need to have each committee list by May 1, 1995 and the lists of events no later than May 15, 1995. Each town's committee will Involve local citizens, chambers of commerce, schools, clubs and other organizations from the youngest to the oldest. The people on your committee may Include those from these many organizations. We are looking forward to having a truly We know great celebration with rrnajor countywide partioipeltlon. • your town will want to be a big pad of this celebration, We expect to have a countywide committee meeting In May. Please forward the names of your committee to our office: 1996 Celebration Committee Denton County HWorlcal Commis911on P 0 Boa 2184 Denton, Texas 713202 • • e~ -'~~r5'L3o trui , Chairman, DCHC DCHC 1 Cormiliiielonm Court P.O. BOX 2184, DENTON, 1 X 76$2 tat FLOOR, COIATHOUSE•ON•THE-SOUARE (817)5654697 • (817)665$893 14003463189 FAX; (817)3620815 d 0 . v r Mizi ''tYiii.• f I tiunq.~.~ 1 l I 0 c O . O h fi~ r 0 1- a • G ~gendefVo. qn . Ageodalt , fo~Z CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING # DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 • TELEPHONE ea 171566-8307 Orrice of the City Manager MEMORANDUM TOs Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROMs Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATES April 18, 1995 SUBJBCTi Additional Information on No Parking Signs or the Square Several meetings ago, Council Member Miller asked about the cost of adding the amount of the fine to the no parking signs on the Square. There are approximately 100 No Parking signs on the Square. If the cost of the ticket ($15) was put, on the existing signs, it would cost us approximately $25 per sign just to re- letter the signs. This does not include the labor of taking them down end putting them back up. A second option would be to add an additional. small sign similar to the sign underneath a stop sign which says four-way stop with the $15 cost on it. That would cost us about $10 per sign. This cost would include the labor because we could attach them very easily co the existing sign posts. Our options then are approximately $2,500 plus labor to re-letter all of the existing signs or approximately $1,000 to add an additional sign underneath the existing signs. • If the Council wants us to pursue either one of these options, we are a bit concerned since the possibility exists that we could receive this same request for other parts of the city where we either have signs denoting a specific time length such as two hour, four hour, or one hour parking; plus numerous no parking zones. We could foresee additional requests for signing in this area and that would be substantial numbers since we have many more signs in these • categories. , • " Dediraied to Quality SerNe e " • O • r- w • ~}endaNo. Ageadalt Lloyd V. Harrell X18 G/ ~7 ti ._C~~ April 18, 1995 Page 2 2 G$Z If you or the Council has further questions on any of these issues, we would be happy to try and answer them at your convenience. R c Svehla Deputy City Manager RS:bw AMM00662 • • • .I;~ ! ' 1•n ~4'J'1 ~ ~ ,'.~~j~i V~1 ~o"~y i~'~ 9 4Sr..'y~h~~SY,}~J . c~ n PHOTOCOPY A to • w • • qq ;;S Agendalterk l CITY COUNCIL REPORT \ Tor Mayor and Members of the city Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATES April 19, 1995 S'RJECTs CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER SOUND SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendation. Sea "Options"s Attachment A. SUMMARY s Council chamber sound system is old and obsolete. Problems exist both with PA system (in the Chamber itself) and the audio signal which is broadcast over Cable TV and used by ANTU-FM radio station. AACKOROUND: The sound system in the Council chambers was installed quite a number of years ■ge and has been tinkered with from time to time ever since. The equipment in old and obsolete. The problems with the system can be divided into two parts: 1. The public address system in the room itself. It is often difficult to hear people speak over the PA system. When the volume is increased, unacceptable feedback occurs. 2. The quality of the audio signal which goes out over the Cable TV system and is also picked up by ANTU-FM radio (UNT) is not good. We are experiencing several problems which include, but may not be limited to, a. poor grounding of some system components which produces a buzzing or humming sound b. electrical interference which comes from other equipment in the room such as the voting board, the light dinner, and the speaker transformeral c. old and inadequate amplifiers and, d. background noise which comes from the air conditioning equipment which is located at the back of the room near the Mayor's office. I have consulted with five different people about the best way to solve these problems. Various solutions have been proposed. While I think it i■ important • to solve as many of the problems as quickly as possible, I am reluctant to recommend any changes which would bacome obsolete or extraneous onoe the Council Chamber is renovated. I have outlined several options (see i.- achment A) for the council's consideration. If improvements are delayed until the Chamber is renovated, the architect would s@ most likely involve an audio/visual consultant to specify certain equipment. However, if the Council wishes to proceed sooner, I feel confident that we can correct moot of the problems in a satisfactory manner. l ~ix7 I • e City Council Report AoendaNo April 19, 1995 Page Apendalt PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt Citizens, City Council, Cable TV staff, Blectrio Utility Communications division. FISCAL IMPACTt $0 - $7,000. RBSPB lLYY 9U I BDa V• Llo d V. Harrell "ity Manager byt 44 Richard Foster Public Information Officer Appgved by t ~~Yl~it oseph Portugal Assistant to the City Manager 1 • 0 J AAAWXI i • City Council Report F 'HIMMEW April 19, 1995 ~$Rdfl N4 Page 3 C Agendaiter~ ATTACIDIENT A: OPTIONS CITY COUNCIL CHAM$ER SOUND SYSTEM .nraw a ►aerox go4auq wm con 1 No action until Chamber Problems continual FIM temporarily 0 is renovated, discontinued broadcasts. 2 Replace podium Bore improvement to sound quality in $50-$200 microphone with Council Chamber) KM temporarily unidirectional mlc. discontinues broadcasts. 3 Do option 02 plus Bound quality in Council Chambers $400 plus purchase two relatively improves as does broadcast sound; KwM Option 02 inexpensive sound probably continues broadcastsl mixers cost. mixers, become extraneous when Chamber is renovated. 4 New mixing console, Bound quality in Council Chambers $3,000 - transformer, improves as doom broadcast soundl X M $4,000 distribution amplifier, continues broadeastel equipment which is compressor/limiter, and purchased can be used after Chamber cables, renovation. 5 Do Option 04 plus All the benefits of option 04 plus better $10800 plus purchase nine new PA and broadcast sound quality for option 04 microphorowe for dais, speakers on dais, coat. 6 Purchase six new Bound quality and volume improve in $900 plus speakers for the council Council Chraherl should be done in option 04 or Chamber. combination with option 04 or 05. 05 cost. i wce d c~ C l / 1 ® ~ et aay v Q O M' ~ 0 l I , ~ 0 J e Agenda No 95 = A9e031ten { N to Io~Z CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TFLFPNONF(81 7) 566-8307 Office of the City Manager CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: April 21, 1995 SUBJECT: Transit Service to DFW Airport At the last regular meeting, Council asked Staff to provide information regarding transit service for mobility impaired citizens to DPW Airport. In consideration of this request, the following information is provided. As you know, SPAN provides both demand response (paratransit) and fixed-route service to the citizens of Denton under a Section 9 grant. The City oversees the provision of this service and works to ensure that citizen concerns are met. However, as a federal grant recipient, the regulations governing Section 9 preclude the city or SPAN from engaging in any charter activities or performing airport shuttle service to DFW. Additionally, under the auspices of the Section 9 provisions, SPAN cannot participate in private for-profit service or give the appearance of competing with a private transit provider performing a similar service, Denton Airport Shuttle is a private transit operation which provides shuttle service to DPW Airport, According to officials with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), this firm is licensed by the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) and is "permitted" to carry passengers to and from DFW. As a licensed carrier, they are required to provide service to and from DFW for any citizen including those who are mobility impaired. This stipulation of e their licensure would be in keeping with ADA provisions and federal law as a motor passenger carrier. Staff understands that the carrier is not currently meeting this requirement since they do not have lift-equipped vehicles to accommodate mobility impaired riders. Further, officials from Denton Airport Shuttle approached SPAN about subcontracting with them to e airport since SPA14 has a lift-equ peed dfleetB sAsvipre iously mentioned, SPAN cannot provide this service as it would violate l charter restrictions imposed by the Section 9 grant. Also, providing such service, even at the request of the private "Uc~dirnrrd m Lh~nlrrr 5'rrvlcr° • • AgerdaNo Agendalle provider, begs the !)RW question in that SPAN would be competing with 7 Z a private carrier licensed by the RRC. SPAN is not eligible to be licensed by the RRC to perform this service for two reasonsi first, as a federal grant recipient it is not permitted to perform charter functions; and, second, there is a licensed RRC carrier already serving the Denton area. Staff has had conversions with Frenchy Rheault and also Steve Pickett at the University of North Texas regarding this matter and possible solutions. Perhapa the best avenue is to approach the carrier directly to help determine how to meet this need. Pursuant to council direction, staff will work with the citizens and the carrier to try and resolve this issue. Please advise if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, jo V. Harrel City Manager Prepared by; Jose Portugal Assistant to the city Manager • 0i • • 3S, ~ , i~~ 4~~~~4~j~.~/~( ~14~"~I i T~'ry jY li~~~A'~tRVJ~n ~1~?3SA.~"r~7~ a d A OUNCIL c i 0 • o w • w • CLTY COUNCIL REPOR ~4pe11daht ,1 - TO Mayor and Members of the City Council ih y1 S'.-~~p FROM Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: April 19, 1995 SUBJECT: LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR HORSES SLMIAKSY: Research on the issue of lot size requirements for horses has been conducted through the Humane Society of the United States, American Humane Association, the American Horse Council, Inc and Dr. Householder, Texas A & M University. Without exception, these individuals stated that it is not practical to assign a speciflc number of square feet per horse for housing purposes, because horses are often kept in stalls, Nonetheless as shown on the accompanying survey many neighboring cities do in fact restrict the number of horses by assigning a per foot ratio formula. The American Horse Council, Inc., as well as the other entities, recommends that municipal guidelines address the following issues: I . SANITARY MANURE COL.LECj QNN~ ST.U A DISPERSAL„ AND DISPOSAL. This issue is dealt with by the City of Denton Code of Ordinance, Section 6-14 (b) MANURE BOXES "Each and every lot, pen, building, stable or other enclosure in the city in which animal named in subsection (a) of this section or other related species are kept, fed, bred, stabled, pastured or housed shall have a manure box not less than 4 feet square and not less than 3 feet deep in which all manure and droppings shall be placed each day. Each such box must be securely screened or otherwise protected from flies, vermin and rodents and shall be thoroughly cleaned out and disinfected at least once each week. It shall be unlawful to pile or stack manure in open stacks in the city." 2, PREVENTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF POLLUTION A GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION. • The current ordinance enables the City to take corrective action in cases in which horse excrement is disposed of in such as way as to allow water contamination. Page • Lotsize • • l • as • agendaNo _ L)L J Apendailem City Council Report - Lot Size Requirements for horses Z46 April 19, 1995 Page 2 1. PREVENTIQN OF Li_ ISE. This is regulated by the City of Denton Code of Ordinance, Section 6-26, ANIMAL NOISE, WASTE; KEEPING OF BEES "it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly:" I Keep any animal that unreasonably barks, howls, whines, crows, or makes other unreasonable noise common to its species near a private residence so that the reasonable use and enjoyment of such property is disturbed; 2. Keep any animal in such a manner as to endanger the public health by the accumulation of organic body waste 4. CONTROL OF F . FS PARASITES AND RODENTS, This is dealt with in the Code of Ordinance in Section 6-14, as previously mentioned. 5 CONTROL OF DUSTS. ODORS_ AND PESTICIDE DRIFT The current Code of Ordinances, Section 6-26, as previously mentioned, and Section 20.2 (c)(1) ODORS, deals with these concerns. "(c) The following acts or conditions, among others, are declared to be odor nuisances in violation of this Code, but such enumeration, shall not be deemed to be exclusive (1) Offensive odors from cow lots, hog pens, fowl coups and other similar places where animals are kept or fed which disturb • the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities " The City of Denton Fire Department, also handles complaints on the issues of pesticide drift. Attached you will find a chart showing the ordinances from other communities dealing with the keeping of livestock. Page 2 Lolsize • • 4gendaNo_ ~•5 AgendBIIem. City Council Report - Lot Size Requirements for Horses IlttF ~5 --r April 19, 1995 Page 3 BACKGROUND Concern has been expressed by a citizen that our cui rent ordinance, dealing with the housing of livestock, allows for too many horses to be kept on an acre of land. At this time the Code of Ordinance, Section 6-13, (a) and (b), stipulates that it is unlawful to maintain livestock in areas that are smaller in size and dimensions than: I . Four hundred (400) square feet for one animal, and Z For each additional animal, other than horses, there must be an additional four hundred (400) square feet per animal. The ordinance does not have any stipulations regarding the amount of space necessary for keeping more than one horse. Therefore, under section b of the ordinance (above) conceivably a citizen could house up to one hundred nine (109) horses (or other livestock) on a single acre (43,560 sq. ft. divided by 400 sq. ft. equals 109). An acre of land consists of forty-three thousand, five hundred, sixty (43,560) square feet. Under our current ordinance it would be possible for 109 head of livestock to lawfully be maintained on one acre. [s$ r AMS, DEPARTMENTS OR OROUPS AFFECTED: Animal Control Division Planning and Development Department Livestock Owners • Page 3 Lotsize .1~,AI • • agentlaNo.~S.: Q~J A fle n da I l em.~.~ ~0--p- City Council Report - Lot Size Requirements for Horses April 19, 1995 4 C6'? Page 4 F1S . r. IMPACT., None Respect Ily submitted: 110 Prepared by: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager '4~ "ella Nonie Malo-Kull Environmental Health 5 'ces Manager Approved: Betty McKean Executive Director Municipal Services/Rconomic Development NM"j Attachments • Page 4 Lolsize : • f'~ ~'~~i .1 r)f. ~M1il )j I~~~jye eh'YJ~ ~ , 4`~~ Who • • ~gnndal>lo.~ a~0ndallom - r ' City Council Report - Lot Size Requirements for Horses p April 19, 1995 SGb ~S Page 5 KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK ORDINASCES CITY MINIMUM NUMBER MINIMUM MANURE DISPOSAL PERMIT Dls'fANCE LIMff LOf SIZE REQUIREMENTS REQM11RF.D FROM AIIJACHNT PROPERTY Arlington 500 R. Pigs vd War m; rcchicken - 100 ft. All , others Carrollton 500 R. 14 400 sq. ft. _ Ilorsea A utflo • 200 sq. M. goats, pigs, sheep bentoo 1000 R. pigs - 400 sq. R. lot Yes 200 A. all arti" 400 sq. _ others A. wh "WAR ul animsl(oxcept horses) 1'I. Wurth ILK) R. - 7,500 sq, ft, per animal fluland 150 It - 21,780sq,ft. per animal i.exisulk 150 A. 3 43,560 sq. A. Yes Yes IrlinB 100 11 - 3,000 sq. R. Per animal i Mcaquite 100 ft. 43,560 ay, R, lot A 2nd I animal 43,560 j sq, ft, exh fit eddifterlal ertimd • Page 5 Lotsize • w • d I'99rldaNn %tgondaRnmr,..- City Council Report - Lot Size Requirements for Horses <*Ie .~~j g April 19, 1995 C Page 6 LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK Arlington Animal Control (817) 451-1436 Contact: Dennis 1 lorces. sheep, goats, cows: 1. Must be kept aI last 100 feet from any habitable adjacent dwelling. Does Doi lnetudo animal owners dwelling 2 No limit to the number of animals per lot and no minimum lot size requirement. 3. No ordmmamw requiring manwe box Only ordinance prohibiting odor with no spocse odor listed. Chickens: 1. Nine or less, no distance requiremeal. 2. Ten or more • 500 feel requirement from any habitable dwelling, Pigs: I . 500 feet distance requirement from any habitable dwelling, this excludes pot bellied pigs. Pot-Iletlied Pigs: 1. No more Than two animals No distance requirements if animals are harbored inside the household, if anmmds uc harbored outside, 500 feet disance requirement from habitable adjacent dwellings. Carrollton Animal Control (214)4166.1420 C'ontact:,Stacey I,ivestoek, shwp, swine, goats, fowl: No more thin 14 animAls. 2, Most be 500 feet away from any habitable building i. I lorscs and cattle must have a minimum of 400 squuo feet per animal with 100 square feet of covered shelter. • 4. Shoup. swine, goals must have a minimum of 200 square feet PK Rnima) with 40 square feet of covered shelter. 5 Manure must be .;moved daily. J J Page 6 { Lotsizc , I • 1 w • . 11 t'gendaNo City Council Report -Lot Size Requirements for Horses it - 4-1 5 April 19, 1995 74 Y Page 7 Port Worth Animal Control Livestock hw"-rued by Code I?aforecment (817)871.6320 Contact: Rodriguez I . Any A", corral or pastm must be kept over 100 feet awry born any adjacent hahkabio building other than animal owner. 2, 75(10 sgWro fad requied per arumrd, "flus includes all property in which the Animal is housed not just lot size, 3. Property must be kept clean. Garland Animal Control (214)205.3570 Contact: Ahe'fuddic I I lorses, cattle, sheep, goats, fowl must loo kept on no less than one half of an setc. 2. Animals must be stalled (not allowed to roam the pasture). 3. Animals can not be stalled wj" 150 feet from adjacent habitable buildings. 4 Stalls and barns must he over five feet away from adjacent property lines. Lewisville Animal Control (214) 219.3478 Contact: Pal Must have permit to house livestock. 2, Minimum of one acre to house livestock with no more than thaw animals. 3, Animals must be kept over 25 feet from adjacent propeth, lines, 4. Animals can nor be confined in a corral, pen, barn, etc„ less than 150 fod from habitable building. 5. No swint allowed with the exception ofpot•bellied pigs. Irving Animal Control (214)l A)-4269 • 1. 1lorses, cattle, sheep, goats, fowl can not be kept within tat feel of any habitable building other than animal osiner. 2 5000 square feet per animal required. 3 No swine allowed, 4 Waste ordinance enforced J Page 7 f Lotsize • • 'I1~1lIiJitIl011i City Council Report - Lot Size Requirements for Horses --a 5 April l9, 1995 O~ g Page 8 t Mesquite Animal Control (214)288.7711 Cootsct: Robes Horses and ponies-private: I. Minimum of one acre with m more than two animals on the rust acre 2. For each additional animal, (hero muss he an additional acre Paltry, Foal, Swine, Goats-private: I . Minimum of two acres mqubW with no more than one animal per acre All !loima►s: 1. No barn, corral, or eoclosuro shad be within 100 feet of may Mbiuble Miildia& 2, Areas zoned agricultural has no distance requirement, • i Page 8 C Lotsize k i 4t fin ` ~I~a, c1 Nr ~lk~l1o~ c> l., C DENTON 000000 00 p0 0~ D o °eo o 00 o °o G Z Q © 0 ~ rl o r-l 0 0 OOO~r~ ~ ppp oo°oa N 00000 a~oo~o CITY COUNCIL r . A • *V&No. 07 4penoalt Lk~te AOL I cl~ I CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (617) 886 830 9 Office of the City Secretary MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jennifer Walters, city secretary SUBJECT: Board/Commission Appointmerits The following is a list of the vacancies for the City's Boards/Commissions.: Cable TV Advisory Board - Council Member Miller has nominated Mark Burroughs. e n er. a teYs U,X Y.y Se etary ACCOOOF4 f 0 ro ca • . f s [ENE) •