HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976
VIP
+'11LZ '1'~I,"l y
I Irzr f)f~u r.
BOOTH. LLOYD AND SIMMONS
302 SAN JACINTO "UILOINO
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701
FRANK R. BOOTH TELEPHONE 1517) CTl 0506
ROBERT H. LLOYD
LUTCHER B. SIMMONS March 10, 1976
JAMES A. BANNEROT
Mr. Jim White
City Manager
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: Aubrey Project
Dear Jim:
Sections 11.307 and 11.308, Texas Watery Code, authorize
the Texas Water Development Board to contrnc+. with the U. S.
Corps of Engineers to acquire storage space in the Aubrey
€ Project. The purchase price by a political subdivision of
{ the State to acquire storage space from the Water Develop-
ment Board is contained in the Texas Water Code as follows:
"Sll.357. Price of Sale: Facilities Acquired
under
Contracts
I
"(a) The price of the sale or transfer of a facility
acquired under a contract shall be the sum of the
direct coat of acquisition, plus an interest charge
computed at a rate of one-half of one percent per year
from the date of acquisition of the facility to the
date of sale or transfer, plus interest at the cumu-
lative average effective rate on all water development
bonds sold up to the date of the sale or transfer for
r
each year or portion of a year for which the board paid
interest to tha other party to the contract, plus the
board's cost of operating and maintaining the facility
from the date of acquisition to the date of the sale or
transfer, less any payments received by the board from
the lease of the facility or the sale of water from it.
"(b) If, in transferring any contract, the board
remains in any way directly, conditionally, or con- 1
tingently liable for the performance of any part of the
contract, then the transferee, in addition to the
payments prescribed by .rubssction (a) of this section, ?
shall pay to the board annually one-half of one percent '
of the remaining amount owed to the other party to the
contract, and shall continue these payments until the
board is fully released from the contract.
i
i
Mr. Jim White
March 10, 1976
Page 2
"511.358. Costs Defined
"With reference to the sale of a state facility, 'direct
cost of acquisition' means the principal amount the
board has paid or agreed to pay for on the facility up
to the date of the sale."
j The contractual arrangement that I envision to be
acceptable to the Water Development Board would contain
i 1. The political subdivision applicant would obtain an
option to purchase a fixed amount of the Water
I Development Board storag3 on or before a date
certain in the future with perhaps 15 years being
an acceptable date. If the option is not called,
then the Water Development Board would be able to
sell the storage space to some other political
f j subdivision.
i
2. The Water Development Board would obtain a cc:.crac-
j tual right to use the applicant's storage space for
overdrafting and for terminal and transfer storage
4 subject to a permit from the Water Rights Commis-
! f sion and a finding that the Water Development Board
had a backup water supply to equal the overdraft
right to provide water during average and below
average runoff and rainfall years.
Following this approach, I recommend that you send a
letter to me addressed to General Rose, the Executive Direc-
tor of the Water Development Board, along the lines of the
attached draft. I will file the letter with the Water
Development Board. Also, if I am successful in getting the
matter on the Water Development Board Agenda on March 16,
1976, I would like you to appear before the Board with me to
explain our position and to answer questions.
Kindest personal regards.
Very truly yours,
Frank R. Booth
FRB:bjs
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Paul Isham i
Mr. Bob Gooch
es
w~
1
i1 I
i
7
DRAFT
E
r`
E General James Rose
Executive Director
Texas Water Development Board
P.O. Box 13087
Austin, Texas 78711
Re: Aubrey Project
Dear General Rose:
t The City of Denton has negotiated a contract with the
+ ! U. S. Corps of Engineers to acquire Aubrey Reservoir Project and has a 26 percent interest in
permit applications
pending before the Water Rights Commission to impound water
in the Aubrey storage space and to divert and use the safe
yield of the 26 percent share or an average of 21.2 M.G.D.
i
i In the event the City of Dallas is unable to acquire a
permit to utilize the remaining 74 percent share of the
Aubrey Project, for which Dallas has negotiated a contract
with the U. S. Corps of Engineers, construction of the
Project does not appear possible unless the Water Develop-
went Board contracts with the U. S. Corps of Engineers to
acquire the conservation storage space remaining after local
political subdivisions have contracted for storage to their
maximum present financial capability.
I
The City of Denton hereby makes preliminary application
to the Water Development Board for financial participatio.:
in the Aubrey Reservoir Project. The 21.2 M.G.D. safe yield
I share of the Project which Denton is prepared to contract
for will supply Denton's projected water requirements to the
year 2994 when used in conjunction with the 4.5 M.G.D. yield
Denton presently owns in the Lewisville Project.
~ i
w Should the Water Development Board acquire storage f
thec Water the Aubrey Development r Board # fonan n opwill tion contract
to t acquire upito
an additional 30 M.G.D. yield from the Project. The addi-
tional 30 M.G.D. yield will supply Denton's projected water
requirements to the year 2020.
Very truly yours,
Jim White
City Manager
r
s
+x'a
'rte ~ •
MY Of Denton .11111licipal Building, Dento?47lms 76201
'j
Office Of O y Manager
i
i
f 1
March 12, 1976 i
1' 1
General James Rose
Executive Director
Texas Water Development Board
P. 0. Box 13087
Austin, Texas 78721
f
Re: Aubrey Reservoir
{ Dear General Rose:
The City of Denton has negotiated a contract with the
U. S. Corps of Engineers to acquire a 26 percent In-
terest in the Aubrey Reservoir Project and has permit
I applications pending before the Water R#?hts Commission
to impound water in the Aubrey storage space and to
divert and use the safe yield of the 26 percent share
or an average of 21.2 MGD.
f In the event the City of Dallas is unable to acquire
thpermit to
74 percent share of
Aubrey Projecte fothe r which remaining Dallas has negotiated a
contract with the U. S. Corps of Engineers, construction
j of the Project does not appear E Development Board contracts with othebU. S.1 Corpshofwater
Engineers to acquire the conservation storage space re-
maining after local political subdivisions have contracted
for storage to their maximum present financial capability.
The City of Denton hereby makes preliminary lication
to the Water Development Board for financilaparticipation
in the Aubrey Reservoir Project. The 21.2 MGD safe yield
share of the Project which Denton is prepared to contract
for will supply Denton's projected water requirements to
the year 1997 when used in conjunction with the 4.5 MGD
yield Denton presently owns in the Lewisville Project.
S
General James Rose
March 12, 1976
Page Two
Should the Water Development acquire storage space in
the Aubrey Project, Denton will contract now with the
f~ Water Development Board for an option to acquire up to
E an additional 30 MGD yield from the Project. The addi-
tional 30 MGD yield will supply Denton's projected
water requirements to the year 2020.
Very truly yours,
I
' James W. White
i City Manager
j JWWsjs
cos Frank Booth
# I Booth, Lloyd 6 Simmons
Attorneys at Law
302-San Jacinto Building
Austin, Texas 78701
Bob Gooch
U Freese t Nichols
~ 811 Lamar Street
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
E Pahl C. Isham, City Attorney
s
I '
i
t
1
r.N,• or~Nr.
BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS
• 302 SAN JACINTO WVILMNO
AUSTIN. TEXAS 79701
FRANK R. BOOTH TKVNON& 1312117/.1 s0/
ROBERT H. LLOYD
LUTCHER B. SIMMONS March 9, 1976
JAMES A. BANNEROT
s
General James Rose
Executive Director
Texas Water Development Board
P.O. Box 13087
Austin, Texas 78711
Dear General Rose:
I f
This letter is a request from the Cities of Denton,
Frisco, Lewisville, Farmers Branch and Grand Prairie for an
opportunity to present their application to the Texas Water
Development Board at its March 16, 1976, meeting for assis-
tance in construction of the Aubrey Reservoir Project author- '
ized by Congress for construction by the U. S. Corps of
Engineers in the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1965, P.L. 89-298.
As proposed by the U. S. Corps of Engineers, the Aubrey
j Reservoir Project would be a multiple purpose Project con-
taining recreation, fish and wildlife, flood control and
municipal water supply storage benefits. Conservation
storage would include an additional 177,600 acre feet by
enlargement of the existing Lewisville Reservoir Project and
799,600 acre feet in the new Aubrey Reservoir. The combined
safe yield of the two reservoirs is estimated by the U. S.
Corps of Engineers to be 91,200 acre feet per annum or an
average of 81.4 million gallons per day.
In 1969, the Texas Water Rights Commission designated
the Cities of Dallas and Denton local sponsors of the Pro-
ject and these two cities have negotiated contracts with the
U. S. Corps of Engineers whireby Denton would acquire a 26
percent interest in the Project at an estimated cost of
$28.9 million and Dallas would acquire a 74 percent interest
in the Project at an estimated cost of $80.6 million. The
Texas Water Rights Commission received applications for
permits to appropriate, impound, divert and use water from
t,e Project from the Cities of Dallas and Denton and the
following additional public subdivisions of the State:
Political Subdivision Impound Divert and Use
City of Frisco 680000 9,000
City of Gainesville 42,000 60000
'Colony Municipal Utility
District go. 1 30,000 4,285
Collin-Denton County Water
i Sanitation District 480000 6,500
~i1 aV e4:s.~
r •y.a t
r
General James Rose
March 9, 1976
Page 2
The Texas Water Rights Commission held a joint public
hearing beginning on January 13, 1476, on all six appli-
cations for permits. A dispute between Dallas and the other
applicants developed during the hearing with Dallas con-
tending that recognition of prior water right claims of
Dallas reduced the safe yield of the Project to 21.9 M.G.D.
and the other applicants contending that the safe yield of
the Project is '.L.4 M.G.D. as found by the U. S. Corps of
Engineers which is the additional safe yield water supply
produced by the Project without impairment of prior water
right claims by Dallas.
An additional controversy developed during the hearing
when Dallas announced that it was discontinuing its long-
standing policy of making the water supply benefits of the
Project available through water supply contracts with water-
h shed cities and Dallas County City customers of Dallas.
Dallas announced its position that its application sought a
permit from the Aubrey Project exclusively for the benefit
of the City of Dallas and that it would not accept a
permit
under any other circumstances,
The Texas Water Rights Commission, at the close of
evidence on January 19, 1976, continued the hearing until
February 18, 1976. During the interval, the Director of
f Permits Division of the Texas Water Rights Commission, Mr.
A. E.,Richardson, submitted a memorandum to the Commission
dated February 11, 1976, concerning the evidence received by
the Commission concerning the safe yield of the Project. A
copy of Mr. Richardson's memorandum is enclosed for your
information.
Mr. Richardson's memorandum contains the following con-
clusions and recommendations concerning the safe yield of
the Project:
01. Yield of Aubrey Oct
ProtThe firm yield of the Aubrey Project (Aubrey Reservoir
plus Lewisville Reservoir enlargement) is totally de-
pendent on the extent of existing downstream water
rights and the priority of those water rights. There
is not significant disagreement among parties involved
that the Aubrey Project increases the firm yield of the
existing Elm Fork system by about 81.4 mgd (91,200
acre-feet per year).
"The computer simulations are merely a series of mathe-
matical computations and the results are dependent only
on the conditions and constraints established. The
only significant difference between all the yield
.
10
f{{(r y,~
General James Rose
(larch 9, 1976
Page 3
studies of the Aubrey Project is that the Dallas studies
recognized full priority over the proposed Aubrey
Project to the overdrafting of the existing Lake Lewis-
ville. The other studies did not."
14. Recommendations
A. Recognize the yield of the Aubrey Project as that
determined by the Corps of Engineers to be distribu-
ted on the basis of ownership of increased storage
t space in each reservoir.
8: Limit total annual diversions from all sources by
each permittee to the firm annual yield of all of
permittee's water supply facilities."
i
On the question of safe yield, Robert S. Gooch, a con-
sulting engineer with the firm of Frcese and Nichols and a
witness for Denton, testified that the yield of 81.4 M.G.D.
does not affect Dallas' prior water right claims because
during the critical drought period all inflows are passed
through the Aubrey storage for the benefit of downstream
rights and that the 81.4 M.G.D. yield from Aubrey is devel-
oped solely from water in storage at the beginning of the
critical drought period (Tr. 779-780). on cross examina-
tion, William A. Sims, a consulting engineer with the firm
i I of Forrest and Cotton, inc., and a witness for Dallas,
admitted that the computer operation yield study introduced
into evidence and proposed by Dallas to reduce the safe
yield to 21.9 M.G.D. contemplated reducing the storage
content of existing Lewisville Reservoir and the Aubrey
Project to zero on numerous occasions, including a 16 con-
secutive month period from October 1955 to January 1957 (Tr.
726-729).
i On February 18, 1976, the applicants stated their
positions on the evidence and Dallas presented a position
paper which stated that Dallas would not accept a p it
from the Texas Water Rights Commission unless it gave all of
the benefits of Dallas' 74 percent of the Project exclu-
sively to the City of Dallas. At this point, the Chairman
of the Texas Water Rights Commission announced that Con-
gressman R4y+ Roberts, the Congressional sponsor,had advised
him that there would be no Federally funded Aubrey Project
unless the benefits of the Project were available to the
watershed cities and Dallas County customer cities as well
as to Dallas itself. Chairman Carter and Commissioner
Dorsey H. Hardeman then both stated that they would not
issue Dallas a permit unless it contained conditionu which
and Dallas continue County customer cities t and hwhicher-
ed required cities Dallas to
sh
tp
r
Wvixc.
MI J r
rti
'General James Rase
March 9, 1976
Page 4
allowed these cities to participate in the benefits of the
Aubrey Project.
Following these announcements and discussion, the
Commission continued the hearing until March 18, 1976, at 10
O'clock A.M.
Therefore, on February 23, 1976, the City Council of
Dallas adopted a resolution relating to the position of the
City of Dallas. I am informed that an attorney for Dallas
has furnished you with a copy of this resolution. As I read
E and understand the resolution, Dallas takes the position
k that it will not accept a permit which contains the con-
ditions Chairman Carter and Commissioner Hardeman announced
must be in any permit issued to Dallas.
From the above discussion, progress toward final con-
struction of the Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project has been
jeopardized by reason of the expressed unwillingness of the
City of Dallas to consider accepting a permit from the Texas
Water Rights Commission in the form and of the content the
Commission feels required b law,
I Dallas will conclude that its best interestslaretservad byf
not participating in this Project. Faced with this prob-
ability, the cities mentioned in the first paragraph of this
letter desire to express their interest in participating in
the Aubrey Project in conjunction with the Water Development
Board. These cities hope that the Water Development Board
will indicate a willingness to participate in the Project
sh,,,uld Dallas elect not to accept the type of permit the
Water Rights Commission will issue.
An appropriate response by the Water Development Board
at this time would be adoption of a Resolution which states
something along the lines of the following:
"NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Texas Water
Development Board supports the earliest possible con-
struction of the Aubrey Dam and Reservoir I-roject and
will, if requested, entertain applications for finan-
cial assistance in the manner presecribed by law, in
furtherance of such Project to the extent that local
sponsoring entities are unvble to obtain permits for
the full yield of the Project and contractually meet
and gice the assurances required by law for construc-
tion of the Project."
Very truly yours,
FRB:bjs Frank R. Booth
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Goldsum
nF L'r;cnn
~NCG-•sl .
00/tON
MINN[AAOLI/•
GNICn00 /T,RAUL
CLCVC"NO
DALLAS N[W TORN
O RLA N OO
D[TROIT THE /y RHILADC VHIA '
.OAT WORTH f.G COMPANY
AN r"ANCIRCO
HONOLULU
HOUSTON WI ■MINOTON
ACI W Rq(-[ NRLDK( /(N(.IT tORSULTART[-b SR
10S ANO[L[/ ■ANAD[N(NT CONSULTANT(
INT(.RATIORAL S(N(.IT/-[NN,Or([ GONNUWrATIORS VONTR[AL
NIANI
I900 R[RUSLK NAM "L MNR TOWER OTTAWA
TORONTO
DALLAS ' TEXAS T SSOI
(SI.) T./•S//T
March 1, 1976
f 1 Mr. Paul C. Ishav
City Attorney
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Dentoo, Texas 76201
i
Dear Mr. Ishas:
This constitutes our proposal to undertake a review of the
1 template insurance and risk management program (excluding group insurance)
of the City of Denton.
The objective of this review will be to provide an independent
and unbiased report to city management of the adequacy,
comprehensiveness
I and appropriateness of the insurance program now in force,,and to make
j ! recommendations 2s to those modifications of that program that would a
appear to be in the interest of the City at this time or in the immediate
future.
This study will include the following fnctorst
1. Identification of the exposures of the City to insurable
typos of loss.
2. Determination of the most appropriate and least costly
method of handling each exposure i.e., commercial
insurance, self-insurance[ bold haraiess agresamts, etc.
3. Review of the insurance and risk managnmaat philosophy of
the City, and devolopswt of recommendations relative to
that philosophy.
1. Analysis of the existing contracts of insurance and
evaluatton of the adequacy and comprehensiveness of
protection afforded by them.
i. Determination of the advisability of any modification of
the present insurance program of the City including such
matters u :
as Changes to or from self-insurance
b. Purchase of additional insurance
R
-Z-
c. Changes in deductible levels
d. Chanps in rating plans
e. Eltalwtion of umucessary coverages
f. Consolidation of coverages
g. Au"'OA r I. of policy terms and conditions
he Reef m Ueration of eysteau of valuation
1. Chan,*@ in practices regarding insurance requirements
frog 14806"t suppliars, or contractors
J. Rscosoeodatiooa regarding the most efficient course
to follow in the purchase of insurance
In undertaking this "signment, our activities will include
visits to your offices and to key facilities as approved by you to
obtain data on the City's opsratio" , ezposur" and insurance policies
C and appropriate conferences with key persouwl as the process of conducting
this study takes place.
To vadertaka this assignment, we will need originals or copies
of all asiattag insurance policies relating to coverages within the
scope of the study. We also will repairs copies of rate calculations,
premium audits, loss atatisties dad la,pection reports, whicb my be in
your files or readily available from ycnr insurance agents or compaaiaa.
Copies of lea" agreazwnts, appraisals, .wntraet"I agrsamants and other
background data will also be most belpfu:..
The Hyatt company is known for the quality of its work, a
reputation developed by assignment to each client's needs of capable and
ezperienced psrsoaa to the respective disciplines rsquirad. The project
team involved in this assignment will be handed bye
Frederick 3. Gillette Froj"t Manager
Diehard X. kkapgood Associate Project !iawger
Additional staff cabers will be "signed " required,
followings Other governmental cli48ts of The Wyatt Company include the
L Dallas-Fort Worth International Airpo•7c
2. Caddo Parish School board. Shreveport, Louisiana
3. City of Chicago, 1113001s
4. County of Maricopa, Arizona
i
Wa would ba happy to provide you with the nzmes of coat@cts of
thQ" anritias should you wish to check the quality of our work.
In be conduct of any assignment we will act solely in a con-
salting and advisory capacity. We do not act " insurance brokers and
will not receive any commissions in connection with your insurance or
a qE rb .:r4'ruC
-T
remuneration from any source other than the fee charged to you for our
professional services. That fee will be based upon the time and out-of-
pocket expenses involved in conducting this study, and is estimated to
reage from $3.000 to $3.000. plus travel uses.
A draft of the report should be available for discussion
within 60 days after commencement of this assignment. The final report
will be in your hands within 30 days thereafter.
n The Wyatt Company also provides consulting service on individual
asaigewats covering various projects, such as the preparation of bid
specifications and evaluation sad recommendation of bids recalved,
feasibility studies for self-.insurance and preparation of insurance
manuals.
i
For thou antities wishing to have consulting service on a
continuous basis, The Wyatt Company can be retaia" to finetion as your
risk or insurance manager following the same concept u retention of
4 legal counsel or a CPA. Retainer services include such things ass
A. Discussion of specific insurance policies prior to removal
to determine the adequacy of limits, desirability of
compatitive bidding, reasonable parameters of renewal
{ preaive and changes to rating plans which might be considered.
D. Easmination and objective report on competing insurance
proposals.
C. Review of policies as received and determination of
whetber they have been properly issued.
D. Analysis of proposals for a change in insurance coverage
originating with year insurance agents.
f. Periodic review of self-insurance levels.
7. Rxaalaatioa of the feasibility of comrolidatiog insurance
policies.
0. Determimatioa of the desirability of self-insurance or
near-insurance.
H. Discussion of other specific problems on which an outside
*piston is dealrad.
Retainer agreements are usually for a fiat monthly amount sad
are either cancellable or subject to renegotiation by either party upon
30 days' notice.
We are pleased to submit this proposal, and look forward to
the opportunity to be of service.
Sincerely,
( yred rick S. Gillette, CPM
Couns"tant
Risk Management Services
tb
Cot We Jim V. White
City Kima`er
i
1 '
I
i
r
1
' ~ r N~
1 ~
THE WYATTC(161PANY
FREWMCK B. GILLE77EO C.P.C.U. CONSULTANT
RISK MANAG04 NT SERVICES
Responsibilities
Project Manager on assignments for the review of Pr
Management and Insurance Programs orn' and Casualty Risk
risk ~ and consultation with clients on various
management problems including self-insurance feasibility and implementa-
tion, analysis of insurance proposals, preparation of specifications, review
of international insurance programs, and other assignments.
f Experience
Kaiser Aluminum $ Chemical Corporation - Twelve years of experience in the
into, ce and risk management department of this corporation, eventually manag-
ing the department with a staff of nine persons. Heavy involvement in self-
1 insurance, international subsidiaries, and large property and business
interruption losses.
Interstate Brands Corporation - Four years as risk manager. Responsible for
total rearrangement of insurance programs, entry into self-insurance in appro-
priate areas. Responsible for Employee Benefits as well as Corporate Insurance.
I ! R. B. Jones Co
~ rporation -One year as an account executive, with euuphasis on
redesign and improvement of insurance and risk management programs.
the Wyatt Company - Consultant since 1975..
Academic Background
Ihiversity cf California - Bachelor of Science
Business Administration (Insurance)
I American Institute for Property 8 Liability Insurance -
C.P.C.U. Diploma
Professional Activities
I
J
Society of Qnartc;red Property $ Casualty Underwriters i
Vice President - Northern California Chapter
American Society of Insurance Management, Inc.
Vice President - Northern California Chapter r
Vice President - Greater Kansas City Chapter
i
Frequent speaker at meetings of professional organizations,
including ASIM (RIDS)
1
I
I
y' Nn.T
fiUW.d.Al
7
l1
E THE WYATr CCIwANy
RICHARD K. Kvwm
WSILTANr
RISK MAHAMg7,rr SERVICES
t
Responsibilities
Consultant on assignments for the review of
Property and
'gement and Insurance Programs. Advises Casualty Risk
aspects, including analysis of domestic and various risk Management
on
analysis of self-insurancep preparation of reign insurance ~e
evaluation of Proposals and other assignmen~ifications for
rienco
I
~r APIA Ten years of service in foreign
[ and Venezuela of this U.S. underwritininsurance operations in Colombia
Colombia, Manager for Venezuela. g~• Assistant Manager for
Ebasco Services, Inc. Three years as a T
molting organization. echnica! Analyst for this insurance
I
Continents! Insurance
Reinsurance Company Fourteen years as Superintendent of Foreign
and Departments and Resident Manager of
Caribbean, Mexico, and Central America. operations in the
j L'Union Nationale NO years as Mane
the Continents! Insurance gig Director of this subsidiary of
Chairman of LfUnion Nationale Beirut, Lebanon. Also elected Vice
The Wyatt Company Consultant since mid-1974.
Academic Background
Brown University - Bachelor of Arts with Final Honors
i
Fletcher School of Low 4 Diplomacy (affiliated with Harvard U.
and Tufts U.) Master of Arts in Law 4 Diplomacy
Insurance College of N.Y. Mares Insurance Courser
Chartered Insurance Institute (London) Fire Insurance g
Reinsurance Courses
i
I '
F
`i
r Sal
.s....
w'VX.1
I
y - YI T.YMS
.2.
Professional Activities
Former Member Executive Ccjdttee, Association of Insurance C4mpanjes
of Colombia-A%CMM; sat on Fire and Marine Technical Commi.,tees.
E
Former Member Board of Governors, Venezuela Fire
Companies Association,
FOPw York er Board of Di rectors, United States Fire
Conference,
a New body concerned fire insurance activities in
Caribbean area.
Past.President and Director of International Trade Association of Puerto
UnFoundinderwriters Member and
Association; sat on Executive Canittee of
Committee of Puerto Ricoh
Inspection and Rating Bureau (Fire).
j Insurance Member, American
Chamber of Ccamerce of Mexico.
Former Member Executive
j of Lebanon. Committee, Association of Insurance Companies
i
Author of "The Foreign Fire Policy" article in The International Insurance
l Monitor, New York.
Author of "private Insurance in Mwdco" by the American Chamber of Commerce, Mexico City. S/1►10(ICl7, published
Attended biennial Hemispheric Insurance Conferences in various Latin
American capitals and conventions of the organization of insurance
Companies of Central America, contributing verbal and written studies
and research findings to these organizations.
i
t
e
1
t t
0
J~
I
I 1
i i
i
s
! S
1 i
f
r I I
fi
I
1
I ~ '
i
I
Y ~
A 1' t
R „ '
I
}~.lv i
{