Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-10-1979
AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 3, 1979 Regular :Meeting of the City rf Denton City Council Tuesday, July 3, 1979 at 7:00 P.M. in the Couitcil Chambers of the Municipal Building. 1. Consider the minutes of the regular meeting of June'26, 1979. 2. Consider an appearance by Alexander Grant Company relative to the annual Financial Statement. 3. Consider a Cooperation Agreement with Texas Indian Conmission concerning Indian Mutual Self-Help Home Ownership Program. 4. Consider a report by Councilman Stephens concerning the sale and purchase of City property. 5. Resolutions: A. Consider a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit a grant apulication to the u6ited States Depart- ment of Energy for assistance in a Resource Recovery Protect. S. Consider a resolution terminating the Airport Agency Agreement with Aerosmith Denton Corporation, C. Consider a resolution notifying Aerosmith Denton Corporation of the intent to recapture the Airport Terminal Building, 6. Consider authorizing the City Manager to implement employ- ment procedures for an Airport Manager. I 7. Consider terminating the 1975 contract with Aerosmith Corporation and taking legal action. { 8. Consider requesting a t3rand Jury investigation of Aerosmith contracts and possible conflicts of interest. 9. Q-28. Consider abandonment of the southern four feet of a , 10' utility easement iocated at 911 Aileen. 10. Consider a report by the City Attorney on the Subdivision € Process. It. Consider approval of the Golden Triangle Mall Subdivision. i 12, Consider setting the July 10, 1979 Study Session Agenda. i City Council Agenda July 3, 1979 Page Two 13. Consent Agenda Each of these items is rpaommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommen- dations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Referrals 1. Z-1405. This is the petition of Mr. Bob Smith requesting a change in zoning from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) classification for approximately 18 acres located on the west side of Mockingbird Lane, adjacent and south of Audra, This PD is proposed for the develop- ment of detached, single family residential homes on lots approximately 6,000 square feet in size, 2, Z-1406. This is the petition of Dr. V. W. Redman requesting three zoning changes on a tract 3,766 acres,in size, located on the north side of Dallas Drive and beginning appproximately 40' north of the intersection of Dallas Drive and Hopkins Drive, The petitioner requests the following: a. A change in zoning from Agriucltural (A) to Multi Family (MF-1) classification on 1.37 acres which begins near the northeast corner of Dallas and Hopkins Drives. b. A change in zoning from Agricultural (A) to General Retail (GP,) classification on 1.773 acres beginning approximately 40' { € north of the Dallas-Hopkins intersection. € f c. A change in zoning from Light Industrial i\ J (L1) to General Retail (GR) classification k on ,623 acre which begins 230' north of the Dallas-Hopkins Drive intersection. 3. S-133, This is the petition of Ms, Kaye Conaway, requesting an amendment to a specific use permit for a day nursery at 707 Carroll Boulevard. The petitioner seeks to increase the number of children permitted at the nursery by 16. This would increase the number of children authorized in the day nursery from 34 to $0. 4. 2-1407. This is the petition of Ms, Linda Lavender k requesting a change in zoning from Multi Family (MV-1) to Single Family (SF-7) classification at 609 !Jest Oak Street, 3 • 1 f ) City Council Agenda July 3, 1979 Page Three i 8. Bids 1. Bid 08674. Compactors and containers. 2. Purchase Order 439148. EMCO Mfg. Co. (over $3,000.00) t A 14. Executive Session A. Land Acquisition. B. Pending Litigation, C. Personnel. D. Board Appointments. 15. Consider Board Appointments. I 1 I 1 I 1 . I f • f I ` k _a._ . WWI y , u ADDENDUM CITY Of DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 3j 1979 i 0 s L Consider final approval of land purchase at Bolivar and McKinney Streets for the future Central Fire Station. i I ! E ~ 3 f r 1 i{ ~ r ! 1 , ~I i i ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 3, 1979 1. Consider contract with Shlmek, Jacobs and Finklea for engineering services at Denton Municipal Airport, i f i I I i I f O"Wi I ' ' 173 City Council June 26, 1979 Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Benton, Texas, Tuesday, June 26, 1979, at 7;00 p.m, in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building, PRESENT: Mayor Nash, Mayor Pro Tao Stephens, Mtvabers Vela, Hensley and Stewartl City Manager Chris Hartung, Acting City Attorney Burt Solemons and City Secretary Brooks Holt. 1. Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Stewart that the minutes of the regulnr meeting of J:no S, 1979 and the special called meeting of June 13, 1979 be approved. Motion carried. I 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (A) A public hoaring was held on 2.1396 the petition of Mr. Goorge Corm, requesting a chango in toning from Single Family (SP•7) to Multi-Family Restricted @1F-R) classification on three acres located on the rest side of Belt Avenue, 320' north of Peach Street. CO The Mayor opened the hearing, After hearing 3 speak in favor and Cq none in opposition, the hearing was closed. W City Planner John Lsvretts advised that 14 letters were mailed, with I returned in favor and 2 against, and that the Planning and ioi:ing Commission Q recmmended approval, Q Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Hensley that the petition be I approved. Motion carried. (E A public hearing was held on 2.1401, the petition of Mr. Robert Welch, requesting annexation and Single Family SF-16) toning classification on 4 47 acres located adjacent and south of Forrestridge Addition and west of the j Monteelto Addition, The Mayor opened the hearing. One spoke in favor and none In opposition. Mayor Pro Tam Slrphens irxP fired about the possible flooding to the i area. 1 The developer answered that he and the City had worked out possible flooding problems. The Mayor closed the hearing. afon. John Layette a.hisod that this was a logical ex•emioe of a subdivi- j ~ Motion was made by Hensley, seconded by Stewart that the petition be n approved. Motion carried. n (C) A public hearing was held on 2.1398 the petition of Mr, Carroll Coen requesting a change in toning from Neighborhoa3 Servieo (NS) to General Retail ((G R) classification on .3 acres located at the southeast corner of Eagle and Kendolph. The Mayor opened the hearing. After hearing 1 speak in favor and rare in opposition, the Mayor closed the hearing. Goan stated that a car wash would be constructed. John Levretta stated that IS letters were mailed with 3 retuned in j favor and 1 in OPMItion. } i i Motion was made byy Stephens, seconded by Vels that the petition be approved subject to approval by the Staff of building plans. Notion a rrfed, , y k i , ISO June 26, 1979 Continued t ' (D) A public hearing was held on 2.1397, the petition of Mr, Barry Wachal, requesting two toning changes an 30 acres located at the northeast corner of Westgato and Payne Drives. The petitioner seeks the following; (l) A change in toning from Agricultural (A) to Single Family (8-10) classification on the northern 9.15 acres of this tract. (2) A clan a in toning from Agricultural (A) to Single Family (EP-7) on Re remaining 20.85 acres. The Mayor opened the hearing. After hearing 1 speak In favor and none in opposition, the Mayer caned the hearing. John Laurette advised that 6 letters were sailed, with 4 returned in opposition, and all of these property owners owned big tracts of land. He added that the utilities were adequate.and Indicated that the "SF-71 hones should be in the $40,000 to $45,000 class. Motion was made by Stewart, sxonded by Vets that the petition be approved. Action carried unanimously. (E) A public hearing was held on 2.1402, the petition of Caluss Development, Ind,,requesting a cha n~a In toning from Agricultural (A) to Planned Davelopnwnt (PD) classification for duplex, zero lot line and Single Family (SF 7) residential uses on 7 acres located on the south side of I.SSE, 650' east of State School Road, The Mayor abstained because of engineering work. chai After hearing oonne speeakoinsfavvornandcaixma yin opposition,, the hearinglwashclosn John Lavretts advised that 2 letters were nailed with none returned, motion was mad=t Monslsccondod by Vela that the petition be approved. Motion carried Nash 4%;t aining. S. The Camcil considered taking final action on E-1393 the petition of Mr. Tom Jester requesting a change in zoning from Agricultural (A) to Light LIj Industrial ( classification on 8 acres located at the northwest corner of East McKinney and Mayhill Road, Acing City Attorney Burt Sol%wd advised that the petition had not j - been deeded, approved or tabled at the lost meeting. t Motion was We by Vale, seconded by Stewart to deny the petition. Discussion, Hensley-4 think this should N approved. Vela.-Could the site of the property totted be less thati requested? Jester••ke need 496.91. Vole withdrew his motion above to deny the petition. Motion was then We by Stewart, seconded by Vela that the south portion containing 486.9' be approved. lotion carried. 4. Tea Cowden considered taking final action on Z-1354, the petition of ' Dr. 1*1tor S. Miller, requesting a change in toning from Single Family (SP-7) to Office (0) clusidcation at 2280 West Oak. Dr. Miller presented hie cue, After his presentation he asked if Vela would abstain from voting because his Department Head at the university had indi- cated opposition, Vela replied, "If 1 hove a conflict, 1 would tell you, you would not have to tell so." I i i Dr. Johanson stated, "I have a lot at stake in this, Both Dr, Miller 1 8 1 and I are victims of circumstances." Kiyor Pro Ton Stephens stated that perhaps historical zoning could be placed with an "O" toning in this case. Motion was nude by Vela, seconded by Stephens to deny the petition. Motion carried 3 to 2. S. The ?be Board concerning thelawardingrof bidsrfor the Tennis Cof the and Recnation. oorlexParksButidlAg, Did 08668, The City l4tan~ter briefed the Council, stating that funs have been committed to projects Xt are now undcrkay, that funding can be acquired only throwls certificates of obligation, however, the Council has indicated opposition to this. We have also found that ■ fund grant can't be fimdod at this time, but that another grant cycle has begin, so a grant request could be submitted in the October cycle. We do ha%v a grant application for restrooms for the tennis center. The Council was in agreemer• that the projects in the 1975 boas program should be completed first. Motion was made by Nash seconded by Stewart to not owed Bid 16668 for (Y) the Tennis Complex Building, Notion carried. W Mayor Nash asked for comments on the tennis center. i Q Jim Nicholas stated that all a as play tennis. He pointed out that much + Q inprovtmont is needed in the tennis complex adding that several hundred dollars have been contributed to the program by individuals. • John Narsutts stated that Waco has a fine tennis program, and that a" fees and sties by the tennis pro went to the city for tennis complex improvements. City Manager Hartung advised that the City was not opposed to the center, but that the roney was just not there. 14ensley stated that Denton has provided excellent facilities thus far and will continue improvements. Stephens indicated that he was opposed to certificates of obligation unless it was an emergency. Nash,-,1You have heard the Manager say that. $34,000 Is just not there." 6. The Cotncil eonsidbred reviewing the location of the sidewalk on Amherst and/or the deletion of this walk frost the sidewalk contract. I Betty Buddonp, 1222 Amherst, representing the residents on the north side of Amherst from Itlnkle to Malone, presented a petition with 11 names request- 4 f ins deletiens of the walks on the north aide. Only 2 >,ere in favor of sidewalks. I` I Lot Knox, 1213 Amherst, located on the south side, advised that then F were very few children on Amherst and that sidewalks were an unnecessary expend- iture of city funds, j Motion was made by Vela, seconded by Stephens that Amherst be deleted It= the sidewalk program. Motion carried. . ORDIN4NCESt no following Ordinances were presented: i (A) Ordtnance 179.4S (Ralph Nations) AN ORDINANCE ANINDING 111E ZONING M%P OF 7115 CITY Of f3f", TFXAS, AS SAME W ~ ADDI'fLD AS AN APPDN111% T'O 7113 COl3D OF ORDIH'tMX:BS OF T}iC CITY OF D1141YN TE%Ai BY M)INAVCE NO. 64.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APT"DhTELY .2 ACRES SF LAND AT 2722 EAST IA4IVLRSITY DRIVE, AS q*N THIS DATE ON Tile OFFICIAL TAX W OF Tip CITY OF DC;NTON, TEXAS, AND MARE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED 111MIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE HATE. i i Notion was Lade by Stephens, seconded by Stewart that the Ordinance be passed. On roll tail vote 4•o:a "aye", Ik:nsley "aye", Stewart "aye", Stephens "aye" and Nash "aye", Motion carried. t 3 i June 26, 1979 Continued + ' (B) Ordinance 179.46 (Billy Claytor) AN CIRDIN4NCE MINDING TIE ZONING 41P OF 11E CITY OF DEN ON TEXAS AS WE W ADOCIIA AS AN APPENDIX TO TIC OODR OF ORDINANCES OF 71E CITY OF R2h' N TE:7N5, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1 AND AS SAID 4W' APPLIES TO LOP 17.1, BLACK 178.3, As SIpNN TIIIS MIT CN III: OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF 711E CITY Of DCWFON, TEXAS, AND MnRB FARTIC• UTARLY DCSCRIRCD TIEREIN; AND MCIARINC AN EFFECTIVE MIT. Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Stephens Oat the Ordinance be passed. On roll call vote Hensley "aye", Vela "aye", Stewart "aye", Stephens "aye" and Nash "aye". Motion carried. (C) Ordinance 179.41 (Elisabeth Garrett) ` AN ORDID0INCE W WANG TIE ZONING 11AP OF TIE CITY OF D[NTON. TEXAS, AS SANG MS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO TIE COOS Or OXRDINkNCES OF DIE CITY OF DiVJN, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1, AND AS SAID M U'•APPLIFS TO APMOXLMATELY 40.227 ACRES IDINrIFlED AS tors 19 AND'20, BLACK 178•F, AS SI0gN TIIIS DA111 ON DIE OFFICIAL TAX ^P OF DO, CITY OF DCNI'CN, ITXAS, AND HW PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED 7181kEIN; AND MCIARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Eonsley that the Ordinance be passed. On roll call vote Stewart "aye", Vela "aye", Hensley "aye", Stephens "aye" and Nash "aye". lotion carried. 8. The following, Resolution was presented approving amendments to the By-laws of the Board of Directors of flow IWpltaL • AT A REaAAR MEErING OF TIE CITY COUNCIL OF TM CITY Of DGNPON, TEXAS, HUD IN 'DIE MUNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON DIE 26V MY OF JUNE, A.D. 1979. i RESOLUTION MIERLAS, the Denton County-City of Denton Texas, Ilos itaI Board has been hereto- fure established under the provisions of Article 4494!•1, V.A.T.C.S., ani as the Agent of the City and County operates the Flow Memorial IospitalI and i MLRPM, tlk Board of Directors of Flow Memorial Hospital has proposed certain amendments to be made to their By-Lows: and WHEREAS, the Commissioners' Court of the County of Denton has approved these certain amendments to the By-Laws of the Board of Directors of Flow Memorial Eospitall NOW TICREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TM CITY MINCIL OF DE CITY OF DEN ON, TEXAS, • 1 TE4tf. The proposed amendments to the by-Laws of the board of Directors of flow Memorial Hospital, attuched as PAIblt "A" and made a part of this Resolution, are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed. PASSFIT AND APPPMM this the 26th day of June, A. D. 1979. DaA7t1LL W91 AY' CITY OF D~?lIOtI, TEXAS • ' ATTESrt ' dLY Cj 114 Si CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APE'R01'Fa AS TO 1= FC W: N1 K 174R1%T_ CITY OF DII2ION, TEXAS a Motion was =Jo byy Vela, seconded by Stcwort that the Resolution be passed, CBs rol l all vote Elensley "rye", Vote "ayo", Stewart "aye", Stephenb 'aye" and Nash "a;ro". Motion carried. t i + June 26, 1979 Continued 183 9. The Cetancll co.aidored site plan approval for a portion of Planned I Development 12, Hayor Nash abstained from voting because of engineering work; Mayor Fro Tem Stephens took the chair, John Lavrotta advised that the Planning Catmisslan tnanimously neeamm- / ended the City Cotatcil approve this revised site plan for it portion of PD-12. with the following conditions: (a) All proposed apartment sites shall observe the toning ordinance standards for Hk41ti•Family (MF•1) classification, with the except. Ion that the " ardcn apartaent" site In the southeast comer of the tract shall be limited Lrn density to 25 units per acre. i (b) Final site an approval by the Planning Commission and City Council will be required for the three proposed apartment sites. (c) Plat approval shall constitute site plan approval for the proposM tern lot lino, duplex, and Single Family (SP-7) sections of this (Y) planned dcvelament. W Motion was nid0 by Vels, seconded by Iknsley that site plan be opproved abstain rtion of Planned Development 12 with conditions. Motion carried with Nash Q 10. The Council considered abandonment of all utility easements within the + Gulden Triangle Mall (Q•29) and considored acceptance of revised easements. a Following a briefing by John Lavretts, cation was made by Vels, seconded by Stuart to abW on the existing easements at the Golden Triangle 4311 addition and to accept the revised easements and easement agreement. Motion carried, 11, no Council considered a change fn policy in the Community Development Grant Fund Domolition Program, I i Jahn Lavretta advised that fM Ids informed the city that now we can fund doaolitioms of all dilapidated houses in the target area regardless of the ownership. The philosophy is that the real beneficiaries of the demotitio:. of a dilapidated house are not eiecessarlly the property tx+mrs, but the persons td:u live in the vighborhood. The persons who live is the target area are ovenfielm- itgly low and moderate income, adding that the staff feels that we should fund all demolition in the target area with ggrant funds. We fcrl that this will speed the clean up of the east Denton area. Ne vill have a total 0f roximately =30,000 in this years and next years program, Therefore the Fuadlng level is III adequate to expand the program. Motion was made by Vela, seconded by Hensley to approve expanding the program. Potion carried. i 12. The Council considered awarding Rid 18662 for drainage laprovearents to FIN ISIS near the reterbilt plant. Rick Svehla stated that on the bid date of June 12 we received only 1 bid, and that was from Luke Turner Construction Company at $46,80.00. The only source of funds for this project is the Capital Improvements Hord Pumd. Motior. was made by vela, seconded by Stephens to award the bid to Lttke Turner Construction CaVany at a bid of $46,88S.00. Motion carried. 13, Tito Council considered awarding bid 16670 for the constru;tion of u Windsor Drive betweer, Stuart and Locust, lotnt ventuRick between Jogoe-Pub is &M Charles Cohen was bidlt as~ for $379,494+50 7To Staff hsd estimated Oka cost to be approximately $2400000.00, and then at a meeting wo approx~tes extra ly draInaSe at ry $40,000.5 Werwould recoiendhthe following f reductions to the contract: (a) Street width to be reduced from 60' to 4S' (this would still allow four lanes of traffic). I i ~ r i l8! Juno 26, 1979 Conti"d . (b) Ellminate 12" storm sewer IIna on the north side of Windsor from the channel to approximately 11011 Avenue, I (c) Elimlrutc the sldcwalk on the South$Ida of Windsor Drive. wil which will c ble t rproject toebe built amotr at a 'tcostatA t CanntbeydrJO in the Capital Improvement Program,' Svehls said, fun Motion was made by Ilcnsle t of Windsor Drive with the followi y' suctions by vela to approve coratructf;n n9 reductions to the contracts (a) Street width to be reduced from 60' to IS', I (b) Eliminate 12" storm sewer line on the north ido of Windsor I from tlv: channel to approximately' Bell Avenue, (c) Eliminate the sidewalk on the south side of Windsor Drive, Motion t -H ed. N• She Council considered e, terl State university to repave Welch Street i o agreement with North Texas Svchla reported that they ere still negotiating with the University on eeze that this 11 benacceptablettooboth, ides ~Themajorfpoints include: out an agreement • (a) The University laying the storm sewer laterals across Welch at their cost. ' (b) Tho University particlpating in the cost of re v 1 approxisute amount of :30,000, pa leg in the (c) This agreement will only be for repaving of Welch Street proper, (d) The Cityy will accept malntenance,for this street until the paying Is complete, This maintenance will begin once the Council has approved the agreement, i to the above points -0 hope totbr nnuly 3 letter to the council from the Wversity agreeing Svehls said. )lotion was made by Stewart, seconded by with NTSU that will be acceptable to both sides. Nationcarr ed in ag ~P1ent is, T'Ao CotnclI considered a source of funding for the repairing of Welch Street and the Tennis Center laprovcments. No action was taken. i 16. The Council considered r Jri p impnOVcwnts on the south fork of Pecan Creek near pre rfe street. drainage e John Lsvrette stated that the Council should move to acquire it porti of Lot 106, Block 212; all of lot 106.1, block 272; and a portion of Lot 136, on Block 272. Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Step-ens that acquiring of the y recommended property be approved. Motion carried. i 17. The Cou clI Considered acquiring additional easements for drainage improvements on the Gain channel of Pecan Creek near Sycaaero Street. John I/vrotta stated that the staff recam,ends 06+t the City acquire the necessary easement, Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Vale to ditect the staff to acquire the necessary easements, Notion carried. i n 11 t W.~ 1 June iii, 1979 Continued 185 lg 1110 Council considered funding for al I and authorltlry; the Croy Ftvmger to start 01 seam for enMtaxi wig ororlay ring Cole, Assistant Clt F n firm 1 that FAA had notified the City that k3nag oca tlonfforthe Coutcll, lie advised Airppoort noway would be available, lio advlacJ that Carro13 FuWflea rO n~snulting' 1:ngfacers had estimated the c;;t of ouch a proJat would be F-lea. sul local Hatching shar0 for the City would be 201 of the total $154,21 Cola stated that hiring an engineer would Pro ect cost which The is Fbtion was made by Stephens, first criteria, Motion carried / to 1, secondod by Ifensley to table the clatter, cacti The Council considered allowing AN111 FM to broadest the City Cow_ il Council rani clay Kistler, News ldantgcr of IV IN It NfSU requested that 0a g pctmissMadiwie fboyr Sthetcphma, sv,,m,fsect to WIV IN I Camc1l equestcd ted Fbtion was onded by Vela that lOt1U r C~ penlisslOn to broadcast rho City Council meetings. . be ganted 20' TAO Council considered the ' mealbershJp in the he North Fbtion Tee carried"' i W Ikvelopnent Board to continuo our tmromnc°dsti the oh and Dcottaale Texas Crried Omniss[on, Q rM;ufres aTheeuuCnity Mmager advised that r mbarship In the North Texas Coamission I The bill for another year isLtAe sync nCOn paid $5,665.00 for a mcmberahfp, figure of $5,66S.o0. Motive, was We by Stephens, seconded b Nash to approve ppaa j tembership in the North Texas Commission at $5,66S.00. Fbtion carriedysmnt for 21, The Councit considered water treatment chanlals. awarding bid 18612 for the yearly supply of 710 purch"Int Departmerc recommended that this bid be awarded to tho r low bidde, for etch item t; follows: North Item one to Amer!-Gas at $202,!'• per ton cylinder of 'Chlorine I Item two SEC Division, Fort to Stirnes Chordcal at :,3615 per pound; Item three l Stulph te,ato 'js Stauffer Chemical Coapany ur lbuston poste Lime to Texas Limo at $52,18 Texas at :156, , 60 Aluminum per ton; item four W0 per per ton bulk; lt!aa 1'!ve to 7! 'Quick j .J3 per town d a item six, SulferEc Acid to Stauffer Chemical at t d Motion by the made by Vols$ a. d by On carried, the bid be awarded as reednacnded by the Purchasing Dopo oParnmotitnont Fbtion carried, 21, Ths Ca"11 cO sidered awarding bid 16647 for airport fencing. j motion was sent to FAA Mr. Manager Gem Ki Cole said that this bid with other infor• Therefore rig , the staff rec ~11C L' Faulkner, who reviewed ark approved It. $6,755,00. O1ttAends this bid Fe awarded to Saditr Fans Supply at Notion was made by Stewart, seconded by Vele that tho bid be rwarded to Sadler Foam Supply it $6,755.00, Fbtion carried, 1 23. Wt Notion was male 1 snot with Cant by Stephcrs, seconded by Stewart that the City CounciI the y Canmissioneas Court At the Carroll Courts liulld * on Jul) 2, t 3979 with at 12;00 my Fbtion carried. 4 24• Notion was made ly Vela, sectltuded by Netlaley that the foliowfng c Ont t Ag"nds be Approved: Fbtion carried. REFLVAIS: i were referred to the Planning and Zoning CammlsslOn forfits rorecommendations: f dtange In ) 2.13990 the Ntftlon of Non ornp eque toning from AAggricultural (A) to GenooralRetail (~laisalficatloo n on 14,5 acres located on tt o south aide of I•SSB at its intersection with f Loop 268. f a; j; "Oil V V Juno 26, 1979 Continued in toning fromm)Flulti pat;iifhe patftion'of Afr, Sorour Partovi, requesting a chaNo eral Re acres located on the Southeast corner ofnEagle andiAvenue glassiflcatia, on 16 ing. (C) Z•1404, the petition of 1fr, Jesse Coffey, requesting the follow- r (1) 4 eh'In in roving2 1 anfrom9Agacresr]eoSaturaSnt (A)theto !•l,t Its o l (rman asslftcation Ikr wes side of ShovFtlt 1tr, beginning 1100' Hatch o off lbrcules Ltuae; (2) Annexation and ldulti•ramily (FIN) classification on an adjolnlnb 14,8 acres, beginning approximately Soo' west of Sheman Drive, 25. no following Resolution calling for the inclusion of the City of Denton and/or Denton County in the Goveltlo,'s, Odd-Even Caroline Rationing Plan was presented; AT A AMLAR "ING OF -nit CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DLyn, ']EW, MELD IN "i 1i1NICIPAL BVILDL+k; OF SAID CITY ON TIM 26711 DdY OF JlAlL+, 1919. ABS0L_ U T 1 0 N MIMEAS, the Governor has issued an Administrstive Directive pproviding for Odd/ Even Gasoline Sales in several Texas Counties beginning Juste 25, 1979; and WrSUS the City of Denton has experienced the same long linos cf automobiles • attempt to obtain gasoline; and WIERW, the City Cowell, upon consideration of the matter, has determined that in its opinion the provisons of the Governor's Administrative Directive concerning Odd/E"n Gasoline Sales will be beneficial to Denton if enacted within the City's Dentonn; And limits, ail that such Administrative Directiti; should be adopted for WIERFAS, it appears that a request to be included within such Administrative Directive must be submitted on behalf of an entire countyl MW, 171FREFOAE, BE IT RESOLVFT BY IM CITY CMOCIL OF T1-M CITY OF Ik'NfON, TEW# TIMI Section I. no City Casxil hereby determines that the corporate limits of tho i C'i'ty ol'Nnton, Denton Coun 0 Texas should be included within the provisions of tie Governor's Adninistrativb Directive providing for Odd/Even Gasoline Sales r beginning June 28, 1979, for portions of Texas, Section It. The City Msnafer or the Assistant City Manager is hereby authorized 1 cfc- s`e MO Co nisslonor a Court of Denton County and thn Office of the Of the determination of the City Council is set out above, and to request Covemor i j the City, of Denton and Denton County be Included within the provisionf of thet Governor A Administrative Directive. r i I Section tt1. The Gevemor Is hereby urged to include all portions of the City o`I 7frn and/or Denton County, which are brought of his under the provisiwts j Acbnlnls ton tratlva Directive within the reallocation of gasoline available as a r/ result of the State's rAergcncy set aside, I Section IV. The ComIssioner's Court of Denton County, Texte, is hereby urged to t roUh-i`Ue matter of to +xsting the Office cf the Coverrar to Include all portions I of Denton County within the Gov.,mor'a Administrative Directive, 5ectlon Y, This Resolution shall becorm effective from and After is passage, PASSED AND APPAOtT. this the 26th day of June, A. D. 1979. i CITY~p, TEXAS I i i i ' Jute 26, 1979 Continued 181 AriESI: . s I CITY OF DE,", TEAS. APPAMU AS TO UCAL FMI: CITY OF DLNTON, iEX4S Notion was made by Ilensley, seconded by Stewart that the A.'solution be Messed. Cn roll call vote Yela "aye", Stewart "aye", ilensloy "aye", Stephens ye and Nash "aye". lotion eerried. 26. The Council recessed Into Executive Session at 12:05 •,m„ Madnesday, .thiaonn 27 1979 to discuss pending or proposed litigation, personnel, land acqulsl- M arl~ Consider board appointments. M 27, no Council reconvened into Public Session at 1200 a.m., Wednesday, June 21, 1979 to unnounce that ra official action was to be taken, Q lhoting adjourned at 12:55 a.m., Wednesday, June 21, 1979. i • ~ Q . I ' I fill , a a a j , I r I ' i i f f City of Denton Memorandum July 3, 1979 AGENDA ITEM: Consider a Cooperation Agreement with the Texas Indian Commission concerning the Indian Mutual Self-Help Home Ownership Program SUMMARY: The Texas Indian Commission operates a housing program to assist Indian families in acquiring single family ho:aes. The Indian Commission will purchase a house and, in effect, lease the house to eligible families, The amount of lease payment is based on the family's income. The family is expected to help the Indian Commission in rehabilitating the property. It is expected that over a period of time the household's income will rise to a point that they will be able to assume the payments in full, and the house will be sold to the family. The Indian Commission is requesting that the City enter a cooperation agree' ment to permit the Commission to operate this program in Denton. The City Council agreed to consider this program and on March 20, took the first step by advertising the City's intent to enter a cooperation agreement. In addition, provision for this program was placed in the Housing Assis- tance Plan that has been submitted with our Community Development Grant Application. RECOWSENDATION: The staff is recommending that we enter the cooperation agreement. We have E drafted an agreement that would limit the program as follows: 1) The program would be limited to existing housing in the core areas of the city. I 2) No more than two units will be permitted on any city block. 3) The house? must be rehabilitated to meet city codes, 4) No more than 20 units will be developed each year and the Commission must obtain Council authorization to continue the program each year. The staff feels that the program will have the advantage of assisting needy households in obtaining standard housing and result in a rehabilitation of a number of housing units. The only u'cadvantage is that while the Texas Indian Commission owns the property, the, are not r;quired to pay property taxes as an agency of the State of Texas. The Commission has agreed to make a payment in lieu of taxes as specified,in the cooperation agreement. i , i 2 ALTERXATIVES: The Council could deny the Indian Commission's request or modify the Co- operation Agreement drafted by the staff. ACTION REQUIREO: The City Council should move to adopt the Cooperation Agreement with the Texas Indian Commission. ! EXHIBITS: "r°.._...._. a memo b Letter from Texas Indian Commission c Cooperation Agreement d Map i I I' so" l•nJtndOan,: r pi.Yi+t• Hontw,. Ch a,# MOM ( 7 Atobmna< altha na Inds, AO.tn.lA - t•,•rra+ion,ii.iny+bn ~ , tlbarry, T. 11373 r~ a 1pu• 1r+Q•n t•7u rsrion Nd« ►o:n, C•mmk.bn« i 11adMgnat K l 7%ora• Tr1b• P. G.Oo+C1 r Stu Ioyb fol. ' Narogdoch•6.14 73i/1 • Am«konlndionCen,N. ' 11l/SW x:01 TEXAS IND.4N COMMISSION Dan*$ Was Int•A1lbolcon0or ixk S$*(COT., Cammh.ton« Della. 11 r 7m d Well tra•mb, 1.x101.• 9h•dor • II rose. T. To o 749Y7 1011 Al.lon, th lry+ron, 1..17711 J Am.lksn Indian l orw+0 913l131141)1J fl!/l~73U6 r forlWON • Inbtlr&I Ca hall January 4, 1979 There are about 25,000 American Indians living in the Dallas/ l Fort Worth Metroplex. Many of these families have left their Reservations in the last fifteen years seeking a better wad of,lifo where job opportunities are available. Billions of 'dollars have been spent to assist Indians on Reservations with limited success. Many find it difficult to.leave the security of the Reservation, but to enter the ma,instream•America, many conscientious Indians who do not want to participate in %yelfaro the rest of their lives are making the sacrifice of moving to the cities. Their greatest. void is their lack of belonging. They are used to having tr1ir own dome on their oun land in an l 'Indian Reservation Culture. The greatest assistance we can ivo them in this very difficult transition is to help them acquire a safe and decent home that they can call their own--a substitute for their Reservation in the-city. Today nEiny Indians are renting substandard houses and boco.no depressed, leaving their lobs to return ta.the' Reservation but finding they cannot make a living for their, families on the Reservation and returning to the city. This costs the employer in training employees and then losing their sorvices. The Texas Indian Commicuion has joined the Dallas Intertribal Center to for-in-the Texas Intertribal Housing Agency and HUD has iven the Agency contract authority to build 400 Indian Mutual elp Horectimership houses in the Metropler•. It is-an excellent program where the Indian Family helps build',the -houses and is' credited with sweat-equity as a dolor payment and%thon pays 200 of his income per month for 25 years or until' the. hcluse i3 paled out, whichever comes first. 'The houses will bo )j-4,and 5,bod- room brick vonedr homes valued at $40,000,00 tb,•,,r)►5 70b0,00 per homo. rho homeowners take pride in caring for' the3r homes pecauso ' , , Y • JIB , t January 4, 1919 , Page 2 f I , (they had to work on the home and feel that it is their new Reservation, consequently staying at their jobs indefinitely. We provide counseling for the families in home maintenance, home economics, home finance, job training and anything else that will help them become a contributing citizen of the community. The Texas Indian Commission must hold the homes in trust until, -they are paid out and will be responsible for proper maintenance. The only hooker is that the homes must be tax exempt until they are paid out. This troubles many cities as we can fully und,r- stand. To alleviatethi.s problem we can pay 10% of the homeowner's pay~cents to the cities.in lieu of taxes. Also, the schools can co}.lect $150.00 per child per year from the Indian Education Act Program. Many Federal Programs, such as Indian Health Services, Proschooi Education, Counseling and Job Training, will bring new social service funds into your city. Further, we trill work with the city by purchasing any substandard I' 'homes and spending $20,000.00 to $30000.00 to rehabilitate them' is I so that when they are paid out they will be placed on the tax roll at a greater tar. value, j I have' enclosed for your review the Texas Indian Commission Statutes, i Admission Policies, Occupancy Agreement for Participants and the I` proposed Cooperation Agreement with your city. I would like to have an opportunity to meet with you to explain the program more fully. I will call you in tho near future to arrange an appointment. Thank you for this consideration. Sincerely yours, Walt Broemer Executive Direotor ` WB Ips ' - Enclosures. + . 1 `t` • • • r , , I THE STATE OF TEXAS COOPERATION AGREEMENT COUNTY OF DENTON This Agreement made and entered into this the - daj of 1979, by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a Homo Rule Municipal Corporation (hereinafter called "CITY"), and the Texas Indian Commission and Dallas Inter-Tribal Center (herein- after called "COMMISSION",. MITNESSETH: -in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the partioa to this Agreement do hereby agree se fol14ws: 1, CITY agrees to permit COMMISSION to purchase a total of eighty (80) single family units to be occupied by households, as approved by the COMMISSION, participating in the Indian Mutual Help homeownership Program ("PROGRAM"), For fiscal year I970-S0,,COMMIS- { SION is authorized to acquire and develop Vrer.ty (20) such single I • family units. I 2. COMMISSION agrees that any such units purchased must be l substanti911y rehabilitated under applicable City standards and codes, 3. Said PROGRAM shall be limited to the area se shown in Ex- hibit "A" attached hereto and in hereby incorporated and made a part I of this agreement. 4. COMMISSION agrees that no more than two (2) single family units will be purchased per city block. S. CITY agrees that usual City services will be provided to these Indian households in the same manner as is provided to all other households within the CITY, B, CITY agrees that it will not levy or impose any real or personal property taxes or special assessments upon such single family units so long as the said units are participating in the PROGRAM. However, during such period of time, COMMISSION shall make a total annual payment in lieu of such taxes and assessments to the CITY in the amount of ten (10%) percent of the aggregate shelter rent charged by the COMMISSION. The term "shelter rent" ' I shall mean the total of all charges to all tenants of the, PROGRAM for dwelling rents and nondxelling rents (excluding all other in- come of such PR%RAM), less the cost to the CITY of all dwelling and nondwelling utilities, When the said unite revert to private ownership, the property shall again ba placed upon the official tax rolls of the CITY. Upon failure of the COMMISSION to make any pay- ment in lieu of taxes and assessments, no lien against any PROGRAM unit or assets of the COMMISSION shall attach, nor shall any in- terest or penalties accrue or attach on account thereof. However, the COMMISSION understands and agrees that these payments in lieu of taxes and assessments to the CITY must be paid in full before new units will be authorized for purchase and development. 7. COMMISSION understands and agrees that it muat-obtain authorization from the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas at the beginning of each fiscal year before proceeding to undertake the PROGRAM and purchase new units. Failure to obtain such permis- i sion for each neN~ fiscal year allows the COMMISSION to continue operation of existing units only. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY and COMMISSION have respoctively signed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: j MXVW~ ATTEST: R00 , 1 NECRETARY TEXAS INDV.I COMMISSION AND DALLAS tCAER-TRIBAL CENTER BY . ATTEST: Ste"-` I Jit } E' l• _ k t, 1-~ 'rr nJ `rII y_, t r I I Z~I ~ r 1 I• i f,1 l1L I 40 t f r t ril ` I `I I., ~ 1 ~f li. i~.l., ~ ~I. ~ - !gin J4 i~ IL Ell, f lL : IC If. JC' CI IC JI . IC l: I,:'~ , \r~c, ~L, ,.,vr III(rIIII 1~~ ` I.. a<p. r .4,or PROPOSED AREA FOR INDIAN HOUSING E EXHIBIT A CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM June 28, 1979 r 1 AGENDA ITEM: Consider authorizing the City Manager to submit a grant application to the United States Department of Energy for assistance in a Resource Recovery project, SUMMARY: The City staff has continued to seek funding to assist the City in the development of a Resource Recovery project, As we have analyzed potential markets for such a project in our City, we have identified the Acme Brick plant as a major user of energy in our city. Further analysis has indicated that if such a project were technically and economically feasible, solid waste might provide up to 50% of the fuel req,jirements for Acme. This proposal, which has been prepared Jointly by the City of Denton, the Institute of Applied Sciences at NTSU, and Acme Brick, envision, the tecnicai analysis of the use of solid waste as a fuel An the brick manufacturing process. We are requesting approximately $60,000 from the Department of Energy; Acme Brick is providing approximately $30,000 in staff and labora- tory time; and the City would provide, in addition to Acme Brick staff time, approximately $21,000 in cash match. RECOMMFNDATIOA: We would respectfully request that the City Council authorize the City manager to submit the proposed application funding for the City's share of this project which would come from the 1979.80 and 1980-81 operating budget. )I ALTERNATIVES: j A. Fund project entirely with local funds,- 4 j{ B. Do not conduct project, ~J AMON REQUIRED: Motion to approve submittal. i i City of Denton Municipal Building, Denton,7Zms 76201 1 011"et of City Alanagu lj June 15, 1979 c Un:olicited Proposal Branch Procurement and Contracts Management Directorate The Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 Re: Ursolicited Proposal s Applicant: City of Denton, TX Gentlemen: Denton, Texas, a city in north central Texas with more than 51,500 population, has addressed its solid waste disposal problems by 1 creatin~y a public-private partnership to investigate the technical feasibility of rafuse derived fuel in the brick industry. The City requests Department of Energy research funds to initiate research in the displacement of oil and gas by ROF. If it can be demon-atrated that this can be accomplished by the Acme Brick Company In Denton. It should be possible to generalize the use of RDF to brick companies throughout the U.S. The brick industry is a very energy-intensive one, and the potential commercial benefit of this research is excellent. The value of the OF that could be utilized in terms of natural gas today is in excess of $60 million. The request is for $60,400 and is matched 1:1 by the applicant. Thank you for the opportunity to submit tho pproposal. Please call Or. baa herty, Principal Investigator, at (817) 788-2713, or myself at {817q} 566-6448 if you require further information during the review. ! Respectfully submitted, . G, 0hris Hartung City Manager GCH/cm a Owl 4 i 11 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROJECT The brick industry in the United States could stand to save as much as $60 million presently spent on cas to fuel their kilns, if the use of refuse derived fuel is determined technically and ' economically feasible. The thrust of this proposal is to inves- tigate the potential for the displacement of oil and gas by PDF. If it can be demonstrated that this can be accomplished by Acme Brick Company in Denton, it should be possible to generalize the use of RDF to the more than 326 brick plants throughout the United States. It has been estimated at this tiro that savings of $60 million in the brick industry annually would be possible if RDF could be used at a 50 percent savings. In 1978, brick production was approximately 8,653,741,000 SBE. It is a growing industry, { particularly in a time of enercu crisis because of its energy- it saving properties. Traditionally, brick manufacturing faces extended periods of interrupted service because of low gas supplies. 1 Obviously, the cost of gas will continue to rise. Despite in effort on the part of the brick industry to reduce dependency on natural gas (see chart on next page), an exiting problem is that with each decrease in the use of natural gas there is an increase in the use of fuel oil by the industry. The development of a technically feasible RDF for use in bric% k'ilns'would be a dramatic answer to these problems. [he initial technical feasibility would be tested in the Acme Brick Research Facility ir, Denton, Texas, Acme Crick Company f is the largest brick manufacturer in the United States. A public-private project tear,, has been assembled to perform the work: (1) City of Denton, texas (the Project Leader Is City Manager Chris Hartun (2) Acme Brick Company (Bob Hockday Is Director of Research , and (3) North Texas Sttte University's 1n:titute of Applied Sciences and Department of Chemistry (Dr. Kenneth Daugherty Is the Principal Investigator). i rIM~M~MMAM+IAMMI~'~1.FMM~M~ Energy Demand by Reporting Organization by Primary Fuel Types Percent 100 Q 1972 m 1978 I EG ~ 1977 (First sfx months) 60 40 to Epp IyN) 20 o ' NATURAL OAS FUEL OIL COAL ELECTRICITY Brick Institute of America. Voluntary Business Energy Conservation Program, Progress Report No. 6, U. S. Department of Energy, April 1978. 1 . , f I I , II i a i 6 BUCK lrsrlru7E o-- - FICA Energy LL icl, aney Table 1912 production (106 SBEO) 197j 1974 1975 1976 Btu's (10121 2678 1009 2729 1471 Ratio (101 Btu/SBE) 26,08 :;,87 21, 2S 12.44 2240 Percent Improvement 9.06 9.60 8 B4 16,83 Base Year 5.1 1.9 8,46 7,51 Recent r.a-*Mjrendl 6.7 17,1 The report from the Brick Institute for the second quarter and first half of 1977 shows the strong trend in reducing energy eonsumptlan and improving efficiency in continuing, F'h!lo improving production rates are undoubtedly having an impact, the is attributed to numerous ener impprothe c cne efficien if the first halt of 1977 trendy cont~nucs, indications arc thekbrick I Adu try d energy rtfnglosy 1972, companies will be using 25 percent less energy in 1977 at the lamp production lovol as in First Half First otr. Second Qtr. First Hal! 1976 1977 Btodsct10? 2(106 SBeI 1977. X977 141 S79 BSS Ratio (101 Btu/SBE) 6.54 4.10 5.86 143) Percentage Improvement 7.78 7.44 6.85 10.16 For the second quarter of 1977 ever 14 17.9 24.4 l 7.09 1977 data indicate the affect of they seuto veraanaturalreturned to normal, The first half of ' switch to 0!1 and propIane as alternate fuels during tgas he firstiq alteraOf jyjjiml7hot industry is continnvastigate use o! coal for direct firing o! ktlno and chows a small sready trenduing to lto ncreased usa of coal, Fol' coal. ,,ion control' cost of facilities, and quality control on a number of products Oro prima r; concerns when considering the use of i Horsy sOU=co. Lf 712 1975 1974 1915 1976 Second otr, First Half I Natural Car 11.21 81.51 12.781 D~76 1977 _ "1P7f r E Propano 61 7- 1.~ 7448t I 1,' Fuel oil 7 1.2 4,9 62,91 Coal ld,l 16.2 15.3 15.3 12,4 0,5 14.0 1,1 Gasoline 0.8 4.4 f./ l1 F.lectrieity 0-4 0.1 O.d O.S 0.4 0.4 1.9 1.8 4.5 461 Background 2nformatton 467 bata'reported b; the Brick Institute Of America for the second gti1art8r 01 1917 rc rereit about 25 percent of industry yy eonaistr of about 27- companies, manyeofiwhich paretrelatively amallrplaThe brick adisteibuted i "rose the country, r-OE'TT findard brick equivatent (2.2S in x ),S in 'x 7,S in) From . Voluntary Business E'riergy Conservation Programs Progress Report No, b, f U, S, Department of Energy. Apri1 1978, j 8 ( I i B, BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1. Cost Estimate A detailed budget for the proposed effort follows on the next page. 2. Current Financial Statement The City of Denton's current financial statement is included, as requested. It is in the Appendix, 3. Description of the Organization ' The City of Denton, Texas, the Acme Brick Plant and Central Research Laboratory of Denton, and the Institute of Applied Sciences of North Texas State University of Denton are joining together to examine Denton's urban waste' as a potentia; energy source for brick plants. The applicant is the City of Denton, Texas, The City has established a joint venture (public-private partnership) with Acme Brick Company, The 'other component of the team (the -technical expertise) would be provided by Dr. Kenneth Daugherty of the Institute of, Applied Sciences at North Texas State University, Brief descriptions of these organizations and personalities are provided in the Appendix. The majority of trio technical research proposed would be performed in the Acme Brick Research Facilities in Denton, I 'texas. Details regarding the facilities, capabilities and equipment are included in the "Facilities Description" portion of the Technical Information settion. Additional research may also be conducted in the Institute j of Applied Sciences of North Texas State University. I ' h C. TECHNICAL INFORtIATION 1. Title: "Urban Waste--A Potential Energy Source for Brick Plants" 2. Abstract of the-Proposed Research The thrust of this proposal is to investigate the potential for the displacement of oil and gas in the brick industry by refuse derived fuel (RDF). If it can be demonstrated that f this can be accomplished by the Acmo Brick Company lit Denton, Texas, it should he possible to generalize the use of RDF to brick companies throughout the nation, As evidence of support for this project, the City of Denton is making a ON contribution of $21,000 and Acme Brick Company is willing to donate their personnel, lab facilities and former research data to this project, a 9 BUDGET DETAIL f 1. Personnel DOE Lplicant l Chris Hartung (Project Leader) 5% of his time benefits) $ 49500 Dr, Ken Daugherty (Princinal Investigator) 1,00 hours - summer, 19P6 E 9,000 250 hours - gunner, 1981 4,500 300 hours -(1980-81) 5,400 Dr, Dc,i Scott (Research Scientist) 300 hours - (1980-81) 5,400 Research Associates - Graduate Students . 'h .a -SusorvTse'lbirr.. Ken bau9her£y`~" i Mr -Joe Grif-Fin - 900 hours X1980-81) 4,:00 Mr. Joe Yan - 900 hours (1960-81 4,500 Hr. Ali Safa - 900 hours (1980-81) 4,500 Clerical, Gra hies, Etc. furs -81~, 39 7AO • $36,180 $ 91900 I 11, Research Facilities A. Use of Acme Brick's kesearch Laboratory 19000 hours @ $30/hour $ 30,000 B. Lab Analysts at Institute of Applied Sciences Task 2b, 13 samples 0 $57/sample $ 741 I f Task 2c, 13 samples 0 13/sample` 169 I Task 2d, 13 samples @ 42/sample 546 i Task 3a, 13 samples @ 45/sample 585 Task 3b, 6 samples @ 1100/sample 500 s $ 2,541 $ 30,000 III. Travel f j Ames, Iowa (one trip) - 2 peopple $ 642 N pt, of Energy (one trip) - 2 people 10000 Local Travel 1980.81) 11000 $'2,542 10 IV. Equipment Lease DOE Applicant Lease or rental of shredding equipment, air-classifying equipment, conveying equipment to be used in pilot plant phase (Step 7) of the project. If this is not feasible, then purchase of RDF and Intercomparisons of that RDF with RDF from the City of Dencon. Estimated cost . . . $.6,000 V. Su lies A. Dept. of Chemistry Parr Bomb Calorimeter with associated equipment including, oxygen bomb, double valve, adiabatic, automatic control with digital thermometer, programmer and printer $ 51500 Supplies for Parr Bomb Calorimeter Soo j . B. Institute of Applie-d Sciences t Purchase of silicon lamp for atomic absorption unit 200 S 4,200 l { VI. Overhead ! Direct Labor Base of 45.5% X (Salary of Principal Investigator + C esearch Scientist Re SupportPersonnel) (.465)($36,180) ee ~ $16,824 Fringe Benefits of 22.18% X (Salary of Principal Investigator + Research Scientist + Support Personnel) (.2218)($22,680) . 5,030 Fringe Denefits of 14.68%'X (Salary of Research Associates) 10982 I Health Insurance Costs of Principal ! Investigator and Research Scientist (18 months)(2 peoplo)(S15/mo,) 540 $24,376 S 11 VI 1. General and Administrative dense Rate DOE AVI1!.ant To be divided equally between Chemistry Dept, and Institute of Applied Sciences 6,67% X (Salary of Principal Investigator + Research Scientist + Research Assoc.) (.0667) X ($32,400) _ $ 2,161 SUVARY Subtotals $80,000 $39190D* ' DOE Request $59,000 City's Cash Hatch $21,000 Applicant's In-Kind $39000 559,040 $60,900 Total Project $1190900 t I i f wrYy W1 rrx I 1 I 12 I i ~ Former data have indicated that RDr' has a low ash and ~ sulfur content, and could be useful without deleterious effects as a fuel for the brick industry. Many more tests h must be conducted concerning the consistency of RDF, Btu contents, moisture content, chcnical analysis, trace i metal contaminants, shreddability, air separability, pilot plant studies and others. The public-private project team created to work on this project include people with RDF experience from Arne Brick Company, City of Denton, and Institute of Applied Sciences and Chemistry Department of North Texas State University. It is fortuitous that the quantity of refuse currently collected and processed by Denton and the fuel needs of the Acme Brick Plant in Denton coincide. It is believed that up to 50% of the fuel needs of a brick plant can be substituted by RDF. Thus, the potential exists to turn a material which currently has a negative $4.00 per ton disposal cost into a positive energy substitute for oil and gas in the brick industry. 3. Work Plan (Detailed Statement) a• Preface About 75 percent of urban waste is combustible material (Table I) which, when exposed to high temperatures, breaks down into gaseous, liquid and solid fuels of varying heat-producing qualities.l Typically, a ton of urban waste contains about 9 million Btus of heat energy, the equivalent of about 65 gallons of oil, about 9,000 cubic feet of natural gas, or more than a third of a ton of coal. The City of Denton, with a population of approximately 61,500 people, produces about 30,000 tons of urban waste annually. The Acme Brick plant in Denton, using up to 50% replacement of its present natural gas fuel, can ule virtually all of the urban waste that Denton produces, Some limited work by Acme Brick Company has indicated that j the Denton urban waste has a low ash and low sulfur content { and can be used in a brick plant as a substitute for f natural gas and other fuels up to a 60% replacement. It is believed that the Dentin domestic refuse can be prepared properly and inexpensively, substitute up to 60% of the natural gas normally used in a brick plant, and produce little difference in effect upon the quality of the brick produced. This is the premise on which this project is based. Enough experience has been already been gained to know that OF fuel is the most logical choice to use in a brick plant, i i i i w PROJECT LEADER ~ w w r. r r r i CHRIS HARTUNGI DENTON CITY J COUNCIL 1 r/ (ADVISORY) 1 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR KEN DAUGHERTY2 PRINCIPAL (ACME) ACME PRESIDENT R.B. HOCKADAY3 ED STOUT3 RESEARCH LAB RESEARCH TEAM N75U)2 (ACME) STAFFS (FROM ORGANIZATION CHARY (1) CITY OF DENTON (2) NORTH TEY)l STATE UNIVERSITY .vi A,ME BRICK COMPANY Ilh I h , r r i I . wsr~ 1 ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HELO'IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, A.D. 1979. RESOLtrTION WHEREAS, certain citizens and organizations in the community, / which include the League of Warren Voters and the Citizens landfill i Site Selection Committee, support the development of a program for resource recovery in the City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas has determined that Resource Recovery may offer a long range solution to the solid waste problem in Denton; and I 6liEREAS, the City Council has determined that funds are available from the United States Department of Energy to finance a portion of the cost of conducting a feasibility analysis for I e r< r-urce Recovery Projecti NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Is hereby authorized to submit an application to the United States Department of Energy for funding to conduct a feasibility analysis of Resource Recovery for the City of Denton. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 3rd day of July, A.D. 1979. i I i CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I ATTEST: I 1 Pf8R5Mre MTrJ1CRTTA1fY - CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BURY 5OtMFTs-RTrM7TTrXMVV' i 1 i rvr I i ETING OF THE TAAT A Y 01,~JULY, INETHE MUNICIPALCDUiLDINO OF SAID}1CITYTONOTHEE3R~DNO DAY OF JULY, A. D, 1979. , R E 8 0 L U T I 0 WHEREAS, the City of Denton , Texas and Aerosmith Do stn" ~ Corporation are parties to an agency agreement dated December I 8, 1865, whereby the City appointed Aerosmith as the true and lawful agent for the City of Denton; and i WHEREAS, by the terms of this agency agreement, the City of Denton may, by a resolution of the Denson City Council, revoke this agency agreement at any time without notice to Aerosmith Denton Corporation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES00ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL •)F THE II CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT: The agency agreement dated December 8, 1888 the parties thereto is hereby revoked and terminated according accord n to the terms of the said agency agreement, said revocation and terminatio: to,be effective at 12;00 midnight on the of day 10 PASSED AND APPROVED this the 3rd day of July, A, D, 1998, CITY OF DENTON0 TEXAS j i ATTEST: f ~ AA CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS t APPROVED AS To LEGAL FORM! r AT910AN5Y, CITY 0{+ DJNTON~ TEXAS t t J i s e I -7 AT A REGULAR MEETINO OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL DUILDINO OF SAID CITY ON THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, A. D. 1979. R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas and Aerosmith Denton Corpo- ration are parties to a lease agreement, dated August 29, 1976 r whereby Aerosmith is entitled to the sole use of mufficient space in the administration building (also known Re the Airport Terminal Building) not to exceed fifty (50%) percent of the whole area= and WHEREAS, under the provisions of the said lease agreement, the City of Denton has the right to recapture, at its option, the use of the administration building under terms and conditions agreed to by the parties and upon written notice to Aerosmith at least ninety (90) days in advance of the effective date of recapture, and ML"'31EAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, upon careful consideration of the matter, has determined to exercise its option { under the said provision of the lease agreement to recapture that administration building, NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS, THAT: 1, The City'Council of the City of Denton hereby determines that the city of Denton should exercise its option to recapture the use of the administration building as allowed by the said agroements 2. The City Manager is hereby authoriaod to advise Aerosmith 1 Denton Corpozation, by written notice, of the City of Denton's intent 1 E to recapture the use of the administration building as allowed by the said lease agreement, PASSED AND APPROVED this the'3rd day of July, A. D. 1979. DILL MAM ATTEST= CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS V BROOKS HOCTg CITY PECKET1 ' CITY OF DENTO-io TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FROM? s ATTORNEY, CITY OV DENTON, TEXAS lh City of Oenw1 Memorandum July 3, 1979 AGENDA ITEM: Q-28. Consider the request for quitclaim of a 4' portion of a 10' utility easement located on the south side of the lot at 911 Aileen, SUMMARY: ~ In constructing a house at 911 Aileen, t advertently sited 2,9' into an existing lo'nutilit?leasemis utility ty eaease- sutt, the petitioner seeks abandonment of the northern 4 of this util ment. The municipal utility department, as well as Lone Star Gas Company and Ceneral Telephone Company, confirmed that no.services are currently located within this 4' portion of the 10' utility easement. Additionally, there are no future plans for its use as an easement. The remaining 6' of this 10' easrmcnt, when combined with the adjoining 10' easement, gives the city a serviceable utility easement of 16', ALTERNATIVES: a) Abandon the 41 portion of the 10 utility easement as requested. b) Retain this unnecesWy 4' portion of the 10' utility easement, in which case it is unlikely the property will be able to be transfered to a new owner. FISCAL Si1WRY: 4 1 There is no monetary value to the city in retaining this 4' portion of a utility easement. f RECOMMENDATION: f The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended the City Council as a bandon this portion of the 10 utility easement to the property owner reqeusted. { CTlON RE l1IE0: The City Council should move to approva the quitclaim request and instruct ! the City Attorney to prepare the appropriate document. EXHIBITS; ' a Memorandum b General Area Map i C Detail Site hap ~ • i 3 [ a ROBCRTS ADDITION E B . c: A~ ~ S R I >ttoclt N ~ r E ~,S~Cr ~ x■r~wr•wr: `fie _ I5 I l ♦ ~ 3 ] t' » •n rn err 41 r 4 BLOCK E Ij ~ 1 1 be, 10 i „ I ` 2/ 5 6 ! t t • ~E. r. ~ Eire~:~ -o it s e e ~ ~ 1, y' f p •r✓n ISE 1= ar rC7 rr it ~i AILEEN i ~ririr' it F•±i 7 I,t ..-".'-l~i"~171. tP .lrtj•1'1- w• •Y • M• ♦ f I ICY ~pp ",•C i~ ~~~i L4 SC i .-J~:L.II• 1 + rr~. u.el__t ,I fee RI ZZ ,}[llr~ n i La 1.l~1'a t r ,rl~_. ! - c ~x~s ~ ta.c~ as I ! ifg E ~ ~ F ~ x E, ~ i 1 ! ° r J.lrr I ~I » { ♦ • Gr x • • ~ wilt` f I loa be, 4 N-'r • rr'r--....~ • y I 1 A /•I ~d r. to 1 Jfp{1 S ~ 11'(pb~ 11 ~ ~ (5y ~ 1 W Mi F~•~[Ira t•~. .~t~1~~ R •II x ~ M b . i>17i FFt'rjj r«•1'JYL••.i.- 1 _ fit 11 w r, r ~ th f pp m , 1 $ M p 10 •C~ ~r •v~w■Ira-•~~ ~rs~t,tFtrr•• ! Yrnl• • •Ti•r ..l~__«~ t ~';~l~999i x ~ Eris a ! ~ ~ r, h P- be, • I 1»,r _ r _f I~ 7 I I~ ~f I My~ t ' xc _L s~tvil tnYW,_.. J 1 r W ` I O W .l.A.«.a.........A,.,.r..aaFr:ura.;•.w✓nxc»a.,,1,iyJ 1 - AIRf" oTERESTED IN PREMISES SURVEYED , A s artil,r tLt I tiR tau date, mods I easeful AM s:cunt• runty rn eM yoand•~ol rox.e rIa.e owsr. ~E ~J • to the tl_y of Dau 7 b7 ,t pst .'•ewnibt( ;'~r ' 'P- CiC Amt' 7q^f'cs ' ~IoehNo.lT 44 Additlo•• a~mGsid,lw, to she Cljy OfDZ•j'f1 +1 s•'L. of I+R /e'':)c~ad~/lnS bVbe' ~ -'."I-~•- R4fmoldaf in Velumt..•^L~al pap,~'1 S-~ .'ef L.Yij rtlJf ~DC~/a!r..' To sae.- 40Aq 1 , /O Fr..f{ifr~ RecoNa 1 14 63. 4 11 IV . v 4 J " ' 2 far lvr 46 Y ' t N % 1 t r tr 7v ~13 '76 m;j ft ,`.case; IA j I;i' E aj s.f ; lnrio .190-'_ Z4o•.T r ''f,'1',. • , 41 + +1 ~ r N B.~L f r ( i I ' . a ,\..TI 1, + I ln'! a C. ' t j 1 . r y'. ~ ~R'Pi•{'.,t ~~,~~*J j'~{'~.~ ~ _ ~ ' ! , ~ ~ ~4•'CY~1w4~Y/! ~S ' f ~ l'~ i ' 1'. r+{t~ ILS~ `'f'['xrf l~l`~1 ~I • t , i• ''fr Vit•~'t'~~a . y , '•'Ir S°d- .,Syr: atrf-• f'S.,n r 'r..,y 1. f>,r •{i e~gt4. i y e 1 r. , , }'t + r. '3 J t' ~,.•t,,.~ a~J fc.AS • 1• ~ ~ •r• , a I ~+,5 V a. `fr i7ir• tu..~4' r a a cc ~ H - 1 • - • 1. ~ . i' , .1'K , -AN rtll'S',I P •t r. :1.' i _4~. { 4„r ~~1'J t S•1 1 71i. f S s r ~ L T•1,ri, t+ f . 1 4 1 ••1 r ::T y 2'45" ' y6 3 r~ ` r51e ? 2 p'hjJ:, F + XA, Ca A A.. iti _ l.J jr= \1a l r r . ° 4' . l Er f ~'1 !aV„ L"r l; ,l r•~x"~i, tie LtaT,: a 1. J„f,, \t1~0 rs tat YTIplH ller1on31sttva, eonrxt a n e~'t•rnpeelestatan Se ;ropenr at eter L'•1 f ~ t • caned ►r *'n"'Y• thr 4nrf InV d,m is of r+41 frtttrt j be' 11 India led b' the 41 ! V.. 1.'+• A be gV,-Wh utb n, fnelrpa of pinp•'+I.tnlp,nlementl At /huwgslfllnpy It eltmd;' -"-I ?J •l.. P.F tE'~ 1}t+.r tl.' M1 Ntbs bnontrln of the rot art bat from Mot MrLGa qs d:nfnt• Irt yf'a +Eytej, , it O 1 LlndiuleJ anS VMlthe/lnlnu h,pr~t1}~eamllntauctdn`atmf. of fo}d.~ie}tgrh 'y'e t}a {'ik` r, I,t~Y 1r~~ f 1 en uie Dyail , 1 r' • R I ke ;TIIER6 OEM? FNCROACIt}fFVf4,lbN dRP + je ,r 413CTS~ ROT41;SIONT~,(t tFYTi{'O~•r"A r~..VR, R ft.tV atrT ir` j , .3u1• . 1 '4 aar. 7 r! r , d!/'s,.lr ~ 1 r f' i I r!~'.'4j,,~~!"••~^•. r i~v/t..}~s~'.SA•aY•1SG J"1• x ~ A 'w•~f• 4L Q S' - ^'\r • f~r1~D•(e ',`7 ~~.7 IW 'e1. a79hC S1Yt~ Yf t'' S ~J~7~ f r.yl' t{'G~f"~r'~~eJe 1 t.1 1 • cf y L t~ "11 ~ r~ 1 f+ ~+•'\Lt'r,.1S ltr rr! Btifrfl f*a~C a/ ard' 1 ~,G}h 9ALLIRU & ASStXiAiE9, INC., VINTd,4 Yr- t •3 tx ~ C,~ C Su4 ou 11 * ! y. • :htr,l^,tl:1i!1fY'RI Y'. Y1 CIS I RS' 15 i!Y'//;i J4•, 7~ IV:f', 1 ~i ~e 'r1{~ia J ''f:; :1~•, r~~~ 1 41 City of Denton Memorandum July 3, 1979 AGENDA ITEM: Consider the Golden Triangle Mall Subdivision. I SUMMARY: 'F The company developing the Golden Triangle Mall wishes to subdivide the j mall Property into individual sites and sell the site to the major stores t•, that will operate in the mall. The lots that would be created correspond to the store buildings and indicate a parking area leading to the surroui,ding streets. This plat would create awkward lots which do not relate to the F way the mall is intended to function. This mail, like all other mail developments, is intended to operate as an integrated developr,ient with a central corridor or mall and with common access and parking over the entire site. Obviously, this is a unique development and subdivision. The staff's main concern is to ensure that if the property is subdivided, the operation as a mall be preserved. As a condition of the sale of the property to individual stores, the stores will enter a Construction, Operation, and Reciprocal Easement Agreement. This is an agreement between the mall company and the individual stores specifying the details of the malt operation and the individual rights and s responsibilities. A part of the.Agreement specifies that there will be common access and parking over the entire mall site. This Agreement will be filed as the subdivision plat is filed and will function as a deed re- striction. This means that the agreement will be binding on all parties and it will take the concurrence of all parties to modify the agreement. The Planning and legal staff has reviewed the Construction, Operation, and Reciprocal Easement Agreement and feet that it does ensure common access and parking on the mall site. Our concern is that the Agreement, as it stands by itself, could be modified. It is conceivable then that the common access and parking agreement could be deleted. Obviously, this would not be in the, interest of the individual stores or the city, but { to prevent this possibility, the Mall company has drafted a statement that will be filed with the Agreement that the common access will be maintained. E The Attorney has reviewed this addition and feels that it is r,dequate. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed the plat and recommended. approval with the following qualifications: 1) The Council quitclaim the original easements and adopt the new ease- ments and easement agreement. j IiM 2 2) The Construction, Operations and Reciprocal Easement Agreement together with the additional statement by the Mall company be signed. 3) The mall subdivision plat not be filed until the agreement and statement are complete and that all of the material be filed together, EXHIBITS: a Memo r b Mall site plan C Mall d Sectionaof.Construction, Operation, and Reciprocal Easement Agreement concerning access e) Statement of Mall Company ° i f i i E i 't f , a I a i s j i , } ~ f i E ORM"ll I •tt= XS.yi.2.. :2-27 tiLT1:~~.. ,ST.:. .•ha'9LN LYJ' '.TTI .,..,,.,r•.'G: - ^:J",«,~.:S iqc~, ••i-', :K:.:: ~:.L".JJ'+.~a'.. •m.LRYi">'• `^'fLrlcJS +.V. r 1J f ~~+\1 rl. .u,r. ,,rii..lt 1. r u i.~•\\ r . k d4 ` ~1,~\ y • _ it. , l~J -g ...+a.. u..•u'. is rL ifs.; A • _4 ~tr.wy Giitm~YtS ~ -NL~► ' KGN it 't• rr4 r ,+ru ribnal'r; •L; ',•yr%,.5~ i1i rl ~ . r •i ~,Y~ a. P-.-• f ``I r,L • u $1a H IOG$ 'NA1rM 1Y V y r: x. r auwa : s, ~.r t.rn i `r~...~r.~ 1 t V At t. 'v. I F-'-a fin Mr w qm ttwg hLL r .4,rr SNOOS 'j rrrr.u vN l.r rt r kterta hh I I. yt' . ~',7^'+`.~ 1~ ' .L.~ L.---I. ~.f .....-vr "v I a . j i•`,Y ~C _y y r: J9 Pam. &91 qy J.C PCIJI :Y CO j . { ~v r 1• , ft ) , , Anw, t ~(~J~ ,t, r---~~"~ '.1 ~ $ I cxala~~ unrccnx ~ ~ tU- LwJ h, y~ an r Wn,. n+r, .r,.l t~ ' \ `.l':~ ~ f I , { yy~6 ~ / '4 rat Ali I .AUw. \ w 4 r .A M ~ ~ y" i `~•1.i :rr t'T (y rt1 a ~ n` i it • a.~1r ~%r~ l,~S a 'YYP ' F Its . _._~1 .~l/• ~t 1 r ,FtQ~d. ~L1 ~~3 rr r rrtu Iu yyitl ;~ux `x '~YYY„Yyy// y ` ~s I ' tr_1 Mwf~~ y.♦t ~ n _ 11 > 1 ~.r<, ~b ~'.A1jP,~,~J :i[~t~7~70w 1f J~ creltu tvlr,tudr. uMt - - _ , r\ W~ruJ>~V~LJ{J Ir~..C CE►~ix~n; 4' M.,"iw`:4 ur~.n k'a ruwpit r.h. fJ'i T1,14~F,_ _ N ivii3''sx..+ir+ist'}: .tY ,„r• `-~•a•,n...,.~r- i I r I i r 1 J I t Sa71 , I: ty1 Y r• . r4. q LotB . rL [ { LOT • Ir11/Y n I/ ~ ulhr I ' ~~w•i11i!• I~ ` I!N•(~ rr .rw.n • 4 + J . ~•}I`J •~f' Il~Ne/' r' •iii. ~ .a.r r~v ti ~~~f~ ~ 1 ;LOT. •Z4.a%.r LOT c ' 1 s 1 3 LOT r • • .i f 1tY R, !JCQa . j /Ir r.. r. d-• i If ' . wr•r •r If~ w.f,~.f,'. R^ '~".1V •"sTlf :~i ♦ N R '0 LOT 4' t 4 S 71 Iti w PROPOSED REPEAT ►1.y'. ~ r' r ~ r/~'/1 DLDEN TRIANGLE ADDITION Loy 9 I~~ 4+ '•'4, "rte•k+~~ ~ MY~I mill W~,.~•~ ' w . to, ~ f I IIM , t. . . . I i I 23.8 The provisions of this Article shall be subject to all the provisions of this Operating Agreement, including, without limitation, the provisions of "General Article 28 Force Majeure", "General Article 29 Eminent Domain", "Op- eration Article 11 Temporary Cessation of Business" and 'Operation Article 21 Improvements Destruction". 23.9 The Parties acknowledge that damages for the breach of any of the operating covenants contained in this Article 23 may be difficult to ascertain. Accordingly, Developer shall be entitled not only to,damages but also to injunctive relief to enforce the foregoing operating cove- nants agbinst each Department Store and to restrain and enjoin a breach or threatened breach thereof. P A R T T H R E E Reciprocal Easements ♦ I Article 24 Ingress and egress Paragraph 24.1 Developer hereb grants to each Department Store for the use of each said Department store and all its Permittees, in common with each other Party, and its Per- mittees, and each said Department Store hereby grants to Developer and each other Department Store for the use of Developer and each Department store and all their respective Permittees, in common with each other Party and its Per- mittees (and in common with any and all other persons, from time to time, lawfully entitled to use the same) mutual, non-exclusive and reciprocal easements in, to and over the Common Area and the Enclosed Mall located upon the Developer Tract and the future Department Store Tract and the Common Area located upon each Department Store Tract, respectively, for the use and enjoyment of the various common facilities for their intended purposes, as shown on the Plot Plan. i Such easements shall be, without limiting the j i i generality of the foregoing sentence, for access and ingress I and egress to, from ahd among all Tracts of all parties to this Operating Agreement (i.ea, the Total Development Tract). i and to and from the public streets and highva abutter the 1`_Jl a e opment Tract as_ghQwn orb p! t;_p~for the parking of vehIclea and the passage of vehicular and pedestrian traffic upon the Common Area and among all such • Tracts (including, without limitation, reasonable access between the shopping Center Tract and each of the Aeserve iTractso consistent with good traffic control and subject to the provisions of Paragraph 4.1(4) bf this Operating Agree- ment), pedestrian traffic in the Enclosed !tall, and for the ` doing of such other things as are authorized or required to i be done upon or within the Common Area and the Enclosed Mall, and for the doing of such other things as are author- ized or required to be done upon or within the Common Area and the Enclosed Hall pursuant to this Operating'Agreement and as shown on the Plot Plan, It is understood and agreed that all such easements created and provided for hereunder shall be appurtenant to all such Tracts, including both the -68- Mpx~ Shopping Center Tract and all component Trac and the Reserve Tracts, and likewi ts thereof se shall be a servitude upon ll such Tracts, A major Public entrance to each level of e aa Department Store Bufldirg from SAVIL vet t e Enc oaed Malch l,to permit pedestrian traffic to, from and between etch such Department Store Building and the Enclosed tM;11, be mes s during maintained by each such Department Store at all hall be the Term of this Operating Agreement, 24.2 The easements granted In paragraph 24,1 of this Operating Agreement shall terminate upon the termination of this Operating Agreement, vehicular except that the easements for and pedestrian fj,fr nv _ strips of la,-,d tra L,;,,ctltute the ring roadandcaccesghose roads, shown crosshatched on (hereinafter referred tho Plot Plan, Exhibit W shall remain and to collectively as the "Ring Road") continue tile Term of this operatingiggtfull force and effect throughout eement, it~and.ef or extensions thereof and thereafter so ton g any renewals Buildings, or any replacements thereof, on thesShoy in the Center Tract shall stand, provided, hcwever# the grantors such easements reserve the right at any time and from timeof to time after the expiration of the Term of this Operating the Ring t Road clocatedhonltheiroresptctlverTractsonion of that (1) Such relocation shall be made at the solepcostdand r expense of the grantor, (fi) the use of the Ring Road for • strictedaoramaterially aimpairedcbis not Lnreasonably re- the quality of construction and b such relocation, (III) tKO vidthof the relocated Ring Road shall be substantially similar to the portion outntnrsuchamannernas(to) catht use relocation shall be carried ference with the use of the Ring the Roadl,and least Possible inter- providedthat after the expiration of the Term of this Operating hav no , further, or repair the Ring Road on theirerespectivetTracts andnanyh Aggranteereement shall the have grantothers right shall to enter upon the Tract of the grantor foe the purpose of maintaining and repairing the Ring Road at such grantee's sole cost and expense, and that any grantee entering upon the Tract of a grantor to effect such maintenance and repair shall defend and save harmless the grantor from all lost, liability$ cost and expense cur In connection with the 's right, At the request of any PartyntoethisxOperating Agree- tnent•, the Parties shall execute a written agreement more particularly identifying and describing the aforesaid Ring I Road easement by metes and bounds, 24.3 in the event the whole, or any Common Area or the Enclosed Mall upon an part' of the f f shall be taken for any public or Y of the Tracts quasi-ublc se under g overnmental laM, ordinance# or re Emineain or gulatfon,ioruby right ofY then, and in an by private purchase In lieu thereof, granted In Paragraphh24,1nof thisgArticleoshall noteshare to any award, compensation or other payment received by the ! grantor for such taking as to that portion of the land so taken which compensatfoniorsothertpaymentdShall,belongasolelyhandard entirely to such grantor, and such grantor shall have no, r further liability to the other Patties hereunder for the loss of Such easements, or portion thereof, located upon the land so t4kenf however, each grantee shall have the right to pursue its own award aga[nst the condemnor for the taking of ` such easements, If i i -69- i ; i semi I 24.4 Each Party hereby further grants to each other Party, subject to the conditions contained in this Article, thu 'non-exclusive right to use (and easements in, to, over, under and across) the Common Area and the Enclosed Mall for the purpose of performing maintenance of any common Area Improvements pursuant to the provisions of this Operating Agreement. 24.5 The Developer shall promulgate rules and regu- lations with respect to the use of the Common Ateas which shall be acceptable to the Department Stores. Reciprocal Easements Article 25 Utilities Paragraph 25.1 Developer hereby grants to each Department Store i for its use in common with Developer, mutual, non-exclusive and reciprocal easements in, to, over and under the Common Area located upon the Developer's Tract and the Future Department Store Tract, and in, to, over and under any portion of the Reserve Tracts which is outside of the Permissible ! / Building Area on the Reserve Tracts for the installation, e operation, maintenance and repair of sewers, iincluding under- ground storm sewers for the drainage of roof and surface waters from each said Department Store Tract) water mains, gas mains, electric power lines, telephone lines and all other Common Utility Facilities (all of which shall be underground) serving the Common Area'and the Improvements located in the Shopping Center, all of which shall be located and pInstalled as plan which owovero tha a in the use of the said eaesements, eachpsaiddDeparmentStoret shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the E Developer's Tract or the Future Department Store Tract or any Reserve Tract, and said easements shall be suh!ect to relocation as hereinafter provided. Sucti easements shall remain and continue in full force and effect throughout the Term of this operating Agreement, including any renewals or extensions thereof, and thereafter so long as any of the Buildings served thereby, or any replacements thereof, on the Total Development Tract shall stand, subject to the terms of Paragraph 25.3 of this Operating Agreement. j, -70- , j i June 13, 1979 The Honorable City Council of The City of Denton, Texas Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Replat of Golden, Triangle Addition, Denton, Denton County, Texas Gentlemen., As consideration for your approval of the Replat of Golden Triangle Addition (the "Plat"), the undersigned will not enter into any amendment or revision of Article 74 of that certain CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Oper- ating Agreement"), a copy of which Operating Agreement has here- tofore'been received by the Plan Commission and is recorded in Vol. , Page Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, which would- ave the `effect of denying or terminating the common access E of any Lot delineated on the Plat, without the simultaneous grant- j ing of an equivalent means of access to said Lot= PROVIDED, HOW- EVER, that nothing contained herein shall limit or be deemed to limit the undersigned's right to enter into any amendment of the Operating Agreement, or Article 24 thereof, which.does not term- inate or deny such access. This covenant shall remain in full force and effect during the term of the Operating Agreement and shall be binding on the undersigned, its successors and assigns. , 1979. I bated this t3day of DENTON MALL COMPA Y, a Texas limite partners p, By: "TON DEVE OPERS, a Texas limit partners ip, General Part { By tierES~►NN , Genera Partn 1 R i STATE OF INDIANA } } SSs COUNTY OF MARION } Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared ,t , known to me to be the person whose name s su sor e t'o the foregoing instrument, and known to me to be a General Partner s in DENTON DEVELOPERS, a Texas limited partnership, general partner of DENTON MALL COMPANY, a Texas limited 'partnership, and acknowledged to me that he executed said instrument for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, and as the act and deed of said limited partnerships } i i Giver under my hand and seal of office this _l ry of j Jwruc 1979. I Q c 1•~-J NOTARY PUBLIC i My commission Expires: JO AN?J GYtEN : ' Natalll'ukd~~ S+.a;t of Md+iar(a i E My County of Residence iss' JAY co:imliWon Expires; 9.5.79 i 1 I t lw, l CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TO: Chris 8artung, City Manager FROM: Tom D. Shaw. ~enleew a n~- ulealll~ ngru~ DATEI June 28, 1979 SUBJECTS Deletion of agenda item Bid / 8674 Compactors 6 Containers Due to the short time period from date of bid openiug until agenda time, the using department and the Purchasing DepartmeKt have been unable to complete our evaluation of the bids submitted. We vould like to request this item be removed from the agenda and .be rescheduled at a later date. Please accept our apology f,)r the inconvenience. f I Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M Purchasing Agent i a t 1 f City of Denton Memorandum Date of Meeting: July 3, 1979 City Council Agenda Item, Furchase order in excess of $3,000.00. a Summary: Purchase order number 39148 is to EMCO Man- ufactur~ng of Plainviev, Texap in the amount of 8868.74. , This order covers the .,removal, complete reconditioning, and installation of unit number 2001, a commercial sidejoading packer body. This body was originally man- 1 1 ufactured by EMCO and they are the only one in a position to reconditio:t a body of this type . Two major components had to be replaced, i the mast, p/n 1113000-3 st.$4770.80 and the compactor blade, ph A3002-1 at $3182.00 the balance of the cost was misc. nuts, bolts, adaptereo pins, latches etc. I The replacement coat of a new unit is in excess of $170000.00. By reconditioning unit number 2001 we have extended its life to equal to a new unit at a savings of approx. $8,200.00. We were unable to aolicite bids on this project r since it ia'single source and we are unable to determine repair cost until the uuit is disaseem- 1 bled. Fiscal Summarys Since the reconditioning of unit 2061 has extend- ed the life of this equipment to equal that of a +II new unit the funda are to be taken from the motor pool replacement account, i Action required: Appr6va3 by City Council and authorisation to pay the invoice am presented. I Alternatives% None. 1 Staff Recommendations We recommend this purchase order be approved and the invoice paid. i Exhibits. IaJoiee copies attaches EMCO Invoice #1834 8230700 1 1887 168.46 less 245.49 v 1871 50.10 J s totels 8868,74 Submitted byl tft b. Shaw, C.P,.!#, Asst. purchasing Agent I ' • M yrv C17Y OF DENTON, TEXAS PURCHAIE ORDER NUM13ER 39148 tl7/362.0601 D/FW 111 267.0012 Y[NDO1 NO, GATE &tii 4-19-79 uo No. none TEAMS net, W,o. No. nOt1Q mco Mfg. CO. 1 DELIVSNY DATkkSAV ACCT. N0. O6-00-67-07 P.O. Box 1747 SNIP VIA rlad>iviea, Texas 79072 I ' To; CITY OF DENTON Vehicle Maint. 804 Texas Denton, Texas 76201 . MOUNT TRei,snoteve, OCK NUMgEA ---r_ ' DESCRIPTION 7body , recondition and install on new truck cl.a#2001 _ recondition intended to increase life oy ti b Y of 3 yeara, )0 110T ptlAIC A78. i L11 i f S"0V/ p,0. N0. ON ALL SHLPA,'NTS, DFINEPY 11tKETE, INVOICES, ETC.. SEND piV01CES nY DUPLICATE TO ACt0UN1S PAYAhLE. T"E CITY OF. OENTtlN, TEXAS IS LKE6ttI FROM SALES 1110 .17 PER "OUSE /ILL 120. THE CITY OF DENTON IS PROIpSITEtl KRCM PAYING FOR VVILE ANOISE BEKOPE R IS PECEIVEO. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST It F.0.1., CITY or DENTON, TEXAS. DIRECT ALL 0MIgltS To: I I I I CITY OF DENTON, PUAWASINO DEpr, 2i5 E. McKinney 9~Y h pORM No, />>:I D Denton, TeAae 76201 1 i 34 ,,y NI,~uA oucA.rT o J PAIL[ L, J P 0 Box 1747 PEA I~Pi INVIEIJ, TEXAS 79072 y o I ' Phono (306) 293-£631 " [ I ~j f~~ n /T ~i • (k6) 293.3247 aA r r~ CH AE I tuo PICATIE LJ 1 a t nAMe CAft t--I C11ANGc CIL q.Lj CHARGE OIL rr-' IISiLR CANT ~fJ 1 1HANG `r' / ' r VNIS 3i P1AL,u0, WNA1P 11 TRANII 10 L LJ 1 uAlt MDD [t "t Prt[IVIO f., 1 A M. ! 7_7 cip on r 4 M l{I 0 ee r t[ucA ALAIAL NO, rP o. PACK 1104T 'r1 h11. I s$ iP Cl A CD[L'' • ~r rJl; L r ' r r 4. 4CO1uf1 t S P [oo MlT[r CIGINa[Nr T[AMl„ f l ' ri10N[Wr[K A[A5 . /AAAtf ❑ 'ftr! { vain, r' ift [a no 0, ; S %TIAff'. ' ❑ t ` ~I A(° ~r- r P t t, c' s cuu oaolA M/ , ona[P wnrnax A'{ r ' a " 1 t 1.} ~,r iVAfH f"7 ~r `'F LA 4 r>' 1 ~1 4 t POIISN L❑J t ~1/1 / F '~S ~b OPCR No inlrn UC TIONm . i r 'I\ .!ha • •Ir. f I'i !'r { -+r-=-r-• ~ 1 t 4 0~ Jr ~ t C.%~jdl1~ G{/ 'At'>< ' } L -1 . r ! 1h P 1 ir u , w F I 11 _ VV ~.GL'} ~..rr Yf n i.e•f`fS~tt+.•p•I • , , fy tyY,ij} li } 1 `+~I f 1 'I: t ; I , t 1 a 'r 1 r P ~ ,IVI■ U `i [■]'`II+I, ~ •1 AQ l s`.f. -7. kk 4. l 1r , ; ' `_'r'_;I'_'j 'y j t i ; : 'f v A l.,r, t t~ i-•p k lo, ~r•,~P Vim... `..L~-- a I l F 1~ 1' 1 ~ , Y'.1 I I k.i tr~V~~1 Y! 1' Ifr •S' 1•e IR, L! --r~~~ ~y t « 1~' to r r r, N. r rt I F , JI•I )~.'~A i:. h T'0~1' 'r {t( 4 ll.Jl ~11..•+ r I r r a l I , ' S: . / ' r r •tl ~I I~• .P."' .1. !_J ~ rr :Y ~ t 1 ' i "t1 ~ !d . F.! , r ~ [ r , r ~t I 7 I r '.1 rr CLM r{I G. ( t r •rf~r, j'''1+1,+,'Lrj 4~1 •~ACCO UNT AMOUNT INT. I If ti ~ I ~ moo- 1 ~ 1 i. Sr+' LAOOR I:' s I ~ r I t I "k y.J ~~,D~ 'T' r"'A r • .I , r ~v.. r is TOT1~L i ~V t~'i 7y~ ~ ~ , „A tT. S -`r PART! I° ~3 ~ f N ' V ~ rl S _ ♦ y i •F 1 ACC Cf % i r':, Ynl . P s oA1t/ r I J F - A T D 1194c f0A LV[7 OA OA AOL TD. cAA) OR ,r'.-,I- 1 j1 t l "r 4 1 tt t ' - r a', ly f 1")r A aAY olt., •F / '1. r IfY'een[ IK .tALt or rlat. TRlft OR 4 A 1 Aust [[TaNO Ova cotraQL, r•. tr e11':rrrry. brA 10 of [.n/ drnl rllA t } 1 i{~ r. 11~/lt} i 1.` 1 r 1 r ' C~ A}t'.,. L \i MtJ1 1161H YJ leiIA( ),PI a* ~ I r ; r rl ; ' I I RIPAIR ' J f~. 14 H a r 1jY [ I0144 Ia.rreN'l IA~,tn. K JI 6e4 AuAPrtunlllt tP t .ti 1 ` •1 / a of i •'r f " A r'' 4 °I • A~ ^~w a •ir '}r. aha.Mrl w'1da Jvr[.n 11 Iu.IPI lP4n i r r , 1 t ! , . r~. { ~,K/ t~ ty L, s 1[/r1iJ wae~MtrY:{119N Pnrtl lrLlaNdP/ l[ t L. M.:1 t . `i'Sl 21 'ri Er .~f„t'3„[,t i 11'•' o t 5 Tarr F T•) >;A 7r ~ .t' M1 y~1:~ I o, cY L Walk lRr ~unl I r/f Atrr And/ 1 Ta01 •r♦ !1"; f'.. t}. ♦ A r { I. r 1 jl 't, y~.+:)1 u} k r. A, h 'S , y'7Se fA ~f \ ♦a I:(,, s _ P',, V, y i?'r fry ~ri+J S t '.J iiS i+1,{r~' tl . q r YP:q. JY~h r~~OSXC'1~ eafA }x~ :4, s' t 5 ~}I •r 1((i A rr. 1. 1 Y , 1f _[.r r•P' . wJ' 11 i . J1 E'ar Yf I 111 r t r yi ~11 I r i i . i'I•f1 . .r 4 i,,•.'ti1e, 'i. 11 •'a , 7A n"1 i f Y ;lY tiL'' EfR i. CLSCRIPTIG`t PRIG[ ` r 1882 PA II TS P 0 8ux 1747 NVIE41;'TEXAS,79072 ~,r P'r'~on©.(605) 293.6631 ! C cnr LAEJR - TDB I ~.v r (906) 2u3-?247 rr,, , . f AM€ LAIR LUGRIGAti'❑ } r CHANGE OIL OILT tA I r CHANGE OIL ALDRt3S LIT'I ~ r + l7tA KART ❑ . F• CHANCI r1 v urn MS R u~ r?{L+lu la '~wa ie~T+ natllt0 t TRANf O!L L,.' ''f ' 2 i I ~L 0 r 4 A M CHANGE 1I~. 1 Rr1 ~~•DIEE D1L r. L1 ` r! V 1 r " 160 1Auth M00 L'- '[A {lAIA hOr + PFOMI{[9 ru, I ' fNl , PACK FRONT I !~'(1 4r r 1 I I t' } A to 1 WH[[L OAG1 CD nn FM rf-14 t Zf 7(15 'y v sr uvvylrtrl,' j decree H¢ T[nML i,~; • A rl.oNC Wn[y A[AOr BN AKf3.'xj~ l.1 Jr~r r' j1 , ♦ O~ M~1 a .y~~'- a iYUO'Fi❑ ` XTl1[7 `-L ❑ 1, ,r r. ,.I+r r ❑ eVir OFOaa n¢ 0~0[A wnnrLN R1 J t r~ONf ,'~;t r 1 lam' ~ ! 1 ~ y 7 t c.~d ~ 2 r ~ i.~ } , r r r r t rt t WASH . ~ ~ '.ir r ' U+~ ~ ,I a -r3,LQ OPIR NO. IrvirnUClrONlr ~ C rr% 17 ail .K I 1 i POLISH a ~ ❑ . I r {~E , t~ ' ~✓l ' ' r O V t i6 11 r1 r 1 J J;• 1 i h r j ~~1 1 • r r~=r t r ly~' ° 1'♦.•Y r` P III l 1. +.`trr •♦y'°~ L of r .•L 7 1, .I -t { ♦ IrL f ',1♦ a. r { .r. . ♦ ~qJr r I r,A I f . 'r. •~i.t, ri'F .tr: r ,ra v• I .~y,' aI ' nr ,;I A i f. .~~f17 L r f P'♦1J 1 rLZr~■f t,.. n~ f' r'4 .11 t L h, •t L r A• ~hLY, v~ I rar. f 11r ll,y.~, 'C v'r t~., 4.+e r■r ,yb h 'nr r~ ~ ■ 00 .7 y 7~~ r+I•I ,JJ ? 1 IrY\ i II t Itr¢'T't J + Ir ~ !1♦• n i, } ' ,,{I rf r i r} 1 J ~ L}! ~CL - r, S r'r 7 r 1 'ilr 1 f "f 14 i♦ 'vL~...~ i~la ' 1 ' IF `Y ACC t/3C1 t1 , fE t- (,•(r y(N 4r•.i Ir!r ; r I.a Pr~ I IS , r 1~ 13 "tl r 1'. , •`r_,?•, ,j. ,1.f ~,L_ ' J + ♦.1 ,fit Vr ry ; i ` Ir 1 ,J, 1 I 1• , '1 .,A' r f'rr a,1 it1 ~.S,~y..r.. 11',~ t ♦L r. ~C i ' ~ r.'r♦~. ~ it , ~ r r • ~ 't ~~~~Y r r r r,, t ~ 1 I ,l i f ' 11 •''.r. r t I . 1"~ d 1 J. 77T Ij ♦1 / ~ + l S`a C `I r , ' 1 ~ e 1 f 4-II~~~tl"`^~ t~ rrjJ i ♦,1 f7_'s s~ r A f sa 1. r' ,r i Y r 1 f r ' 11 p r i l I f ~r 1 ( f raj , i ~q r I ; I V f/1 1 • 1 • ! i . rl r J +1 d' fr A~ a 1'}'•1s(~ IJp ♦ fl~~~?« G /r `S 1, JuN 1 r ` 1 `._-tT e' 1; 1 t.. ♦I rr', ( r t, 1 1111'; fi 'tr r y ry\1\F~~ r~" r ' ' I i a r 1 1' •r l j r ' J l 1' i! a LL 1 /y~~~•'~ .~~r{~...--.-•-N•. i. r ACCOUNr11 'AMOUNT rINT.' .r CLM -~{~)1t1F11G` J, , ,$t ~,Zr r~'r Jl /A' a r . r f v tDTAL fti rr- r IT•,..w. ` ,.1 r.' J 1 1 1 r i a.~..~ r`: r LAbDR \ ) s., ! /'~~~•~1' 5J , . h1• , rl, •.i " r - ;t,. it 1DTAI. PARSE L, r. r r !A E JI` SJ^a., S~ L r Ottt- 1 a1', 1 .ry r * AGC IL -1.. r p1 A IE. T - •t_ : fORlI9I~ r , ,1 r.• "i OIL 4 S U t0 LAAI OA L• r r1 •fl- M01 RICLLi~ POV FFII LI /1011 LOSS 01 CAM AG[ ~ OA1, On IOAtA1Yi r ' lt1Y IK, iAAI IN GAl1'01 flf,~7111 t LAAY bR al l,' [ •1 'a" r n 7' CAE. Gll ft ' t', , ha'{, e n 4 1 AA OTNIR CAUSE tY0N1 bU A_CON 1AOl: 3 I S,OR CAST . f ♦ M I Aurlr IulAarlll Sha allrl Irrdl knl „11 11 4A1 ailnl f 1 J "'%I t 1 ti, ' SIAM 1:A1 Ay ry;,; II r' SUPRA ? 0' Inl'nlnrwf naln,l,,:.nL SINS, 1rlA! n[.Ir•!/M'Ylnr •IlAIm 1! J t: . rl f r'~ f~" RCPA10.fn ~'1 1•. 1 1) r r~ prj41'Iun 1141 11 bafala th 11(k I'Yd Ilr tA4uu11ra {N " r., mot! ~;yw, „y f, 'L r S 9 ' it ' 11104 ~'.AIIInarL ar alNrt~H/'}¢f1,1 larlbl ~ 4111n1 M1/N t%.~~ ~ ~ ~r r,r '•ry,- % ~~1- '11~.r rl ry '11 i. `Tf4: 11~f 'f~.11 L, ,r - RBI r IAW06m. AA L I rv 4,6, m r r AaA to L ^ rrDP H'~ArML[ rl M 1 4 t , r<~'^ . , OIaA rar Ir,I~a1A la biur P4 imlu+lll ~dE1r111. ~rI~L~<t s , • . 1 t + y, y. K 1 y ,•IS c t fr'i~ r.t. ,,1 ♦1 I'•1 f r AL'n r i~ • ~L Ir ' % 2`Ir fr'f 'e'rr' • Y A a•, 4 r J.. ~3i., p i i ~ tr to ♦ 1~., •e ~ :5"f 1~ r 'J 1111',' 'S „f !'1 rA~ •J fir.. f' r~r." 'i SYpj I "r 4{q tl I, rr i r, J c rI L, pl, 'A' / '/~{1~ J r 1 rl 'Eawl.,r.Ji Jf, j,f RJ, 1. ~Er r.,.r Lr•Ir 'Y J ! C 1 IJa~, t AI is, n. ri;r i•~.~ .i ~'Cf A -5 1. 1 r h iri. (f'i (.F.. } ':t` f;1~,',! . „?OfAtl .,1 1. J rw:av,r~ • OYAN, NUMfl[R DELp-PT10 N'_ PgiCi, rpm t 1 r P Q ~ eLRjIL PLAINV1E4J Q 1X47 is 41 qq ~j' EXAS 790721 296 G63i J / I • , "w...}I• LAD 4 (BO6) 233=3247 i t mApBe J 1 rti 1 U { _ /~'/JO(/'.27r'/ ~/✓S'/C%•~_ -3 1 y' f R1CAf1 ❑ .t I JT C7 "~6 0 j Y.. NA /Mf~ r+ r 7 OAIt t CHANct CIL ` A N Olt r' / I ~j ~ •I - Cy I G[ 01 J G ~T~ AC[1RF55 C' Y {-7 N71111 ART. 1 , / I C I J , ,N71111 CAR. LJ „ rn ~JL:irC~. CTjt~O/>'J.rrf TRANS I UNIT AI p OIL' sit r4N IaL, NO w6nR AnTr ~ rCt EiYtO AM T ~ TRANS, - y C 1 ' tr'•1 W i t fa /J 7 1 ~ ~ : 1 CNAN I !fAl ~s'~ _ h ~ ~ ~ r~R CIt1 OIL ❑ A , y s~ / I rx,rt• lu N RO f , . , f 1 Y / ^~L lJ/fj f f I IUCA M00 l LLl IA11T • ; 7f ,.Z. ~ ~3'S-~h3•y' ~~11~i ~ 1 ' ? ' h ' ..'.r' 1RO~". c) w H i } .I000Nqu ({vctw6[rve, TRW r ohe wHtn Rta OY f' 940 %q 1❑ ix r `1 . : 1,--- ~O ..I ~'.j , j N i`!r \ t.:' ~ r{T11 !HD ~ ~ %T!R[!J+ ❑ y ~yfi 'i 4 V4 _8S lr ~,dr Su' r YIr DROtR no t Don~rocn w~utrt~ry r+ 7MOne ~Y "t i'' t'. PAL AD, K _ !vt ! Syr. 1,11 r a I+•~ t WASk J d Llt i• ~ (L'I C/C. .L- 1' ! y v ty . [ w r i..• { r7 + ~ j~l / % _(GLLl~i...--.._ 41[ SO Cp Cll NO r![I'pUCTIOA Ir ~ t r.,l. r I'•: ie 7'r: t ~ •1~ T rOUlk,l l/ ~ t ~r r. •r;_ i ,1 _ ' vV v 1 I•,1 1 ! r 7 t x' ,r r 'I,• t .i'~Fr:~ ~ _ tr• 'i`ce' t + 5 ~ i I ~i' t ' i i a I•t • , ~ i F -•••t .--r--- fir'---•---••-.~"r.-•- , ii T -r~ ,-^7-7r . ~r lee A nq ~ ~ I e ~ , ~ b~ ri,l ver,l S,iyU 1 fiw R•y/a'I rS r,✓ . A '/I/7~~' 7TH/A••i ' + . r 4 J, y : ~ d n 1. 11 ! t + y, ~ r<•-.r yax' Y~`~'~'- r' i .I 't )Pyl_+,'yo•` , ir'.r •Frr.. tf•t~t ,Sr i:.• y r iti C4 nn ~r y //Y. ~~.iyA r r rri ai F •7 ~'•w!/ _ ' + •r., ..I t. 1, V C i'1 h:~'1n rlA" i [ It s f' .~f•i. • ~ TL f• n - i ' 1. ~ : Va rt✓ a y ,R ti`rlsf i 'A; tf ~T/ I r \~h'IVt yl••?`, IT 1E4 I A ~ 'r 1. If •O f s„1• ' r ` cr f r i{ti. 't~, t P~ . •t ll.} y" ,R ' tr/ f A L I _ r y j -r- r y r r. r♦ r Y y -/////yam S .jr w N.' t e n r. R t l.+r ' ~•G s' I~N r//." .1.- O .11 'r •'1• ,r! ' • 4 r ! L l~ r.r Y.:L . ` / 'L 1 gl~ y w ' f • 0 y • a L L • 7 ~~~'/p ~•C •A '1 >i aJ P l.'f,ty~ ru acT 6truwl. r a { 1 ~~7,+w,~ 1 ACCOUNT AMOUNT C INY L CLM C,h ~4~ fie, t ~r r • r N . 11 t f. TOTAL L l ! t '1 G~ r 1 ~ Y ! . .r t, ~ ~ ~ F l r ' } r n i r 1 • LA9 0 R _ e rr /~~j,,rr~~ r: 14 :N I lisrh ~ 1 6.~..~~ ~r'r ` 4 i ~ 14.4 IT'A}1T9 r, f' r„ a r~ti A` 1 d'• 1 ~L~ti r L ~+r~.. j t' { d I1I^ 44 1 1.i . f ACC[hj 1. 1 i ~}r1~L) 1 ,L ~li w~c'1- r,[C,~~~+R ! d SORT L. OIL OIYIOr[AIt' MOf RiarOhR 1011 OR OAYAGL 10 LA RL TOR , 1 Q1L O,L®•: ARfICl L1 LCfT It. CARL IR CA 1C'Of fine .!Hell OR ;e 1 , t •.y L • ° OA9. 01L• r _,r AMT DTx[R CALL[ ItY01,0 OUR CONTROL ' I r,~• 9 OA[AIt M, L f, r r ; ;.y 11UINa 5v11,0411Lt OU"1 rtMlr will 11 Ir 0610 14q with • 1 > w: L t:' LUIILLT I v. t 6 . ' f i•0' OALL OAf • ® fN6 berHarr pthrl}1, 'A, Ngdf '1•Inl oft ampler rein on. '.r 1" rw, A[M1A~~ r It . . 1~~~, 1 1T R4ryu1 IunWloR.l6 IIIr6~j TAI too of VYIL IT•6IR Ulalbl n ' Wtv4'Ni1Rwo tr'6New1u6 ter tRl V'rlwl 1I Ldinl 6now i n.'• f 6. r i rr~l r 'r' * d~ r,' y °l. r'*~ 6 } TO. 6 llf. ORfaf! Q Inqldba: An,alew wu6.lnq'i 14 n•, 16 1ue'4 qYq rdNO IA R 1 . a+ t . . - f a tln! IV Rf 11 YtR U•n1earl'INI RTOA•} a1.1~0ai11 iMNb '1', . 1, ~ ~"j'~ r~ 1 t Tf~ r I Y • r' 1 a 1 Lr r N> t..~ •>wtr t4 t e {A% X 5 f' ' h J•.~~t } 1 r,y ,y y i,. ti Nt }at,,. + Rs fHi"TOTAL ' J ti•; 1. S''a. frr ~.ti .tii fj w•. '/nP•: }.r.,j• . rf . r. ':4 i r1 ~J i': ~}rl. a~i.t✓!t ~r~.,l 1J 1 '.6r :ar...v~:.'rM.S...n Yr1~•t{ rti'r;5- J J 19 Ch „ 7 SL1V ~ j LCS^GP! J FI ICE P p..aGr,FaT 18$8 tdrQ_. PLAINVJEY,'; TEXAS:79072 Phone (©0& ~9o 6D f (E06) 29J1247 0.4 a HAAll It -2L 44,Lo-, aiAv a`.rc. '7. tue Rle Alt ❑ t. CMANGS 011 r ❑ ADDRESS , Gilt ' CNANGI OIL i r OmItt CART. ❑ 1 CHANG -xlr I uotl uv~T Kvirl no.~' wllq xnrr acuvcb TaAN3.OIL ❑ J A'BM' 'CNA11G1 • ! "T" ~ rr M. LII► OIL ❑ ~ }r rNl 1 M 0u tl reuCF SE Al, r.h -f r, y aMOH licb + 1ACK 110FFT ` r 77-7 -7 11 ADJUST 1 _ Irt, ogwtiEq. i , yux{1 Np ^ rdwM, 6. 1lo qt wx IMRIACT B 1AKt trip°NOQ;Y,' r ❑ ~ - - UGtr OvoEI No ~~ca. wnltJtM r ,avprrC j r %ytlA [I ° C'1 tit 1 / y + e , i l-J 7 F.•-.--a ~`G r ~ d i i 7 WASI!l; + i'Q - r OpF N0: iN OxR, Y , y ►OL~lM q. } % 7;7 7 ifl F rr a ~4, ai"r f 1 ~.,Yil ySr,'{. 5l':•zT✓r717~ ' 7 •j YY~ ~r'S~t t In- . t; ACCdUORU . 11. , 6 iJ' Yr+ ',d.~ rr ,1'.• a lr! y dr .y, ' r/~'.r/,~ t ~ ~J,. 16 ~ i ' 1111 Ltf RIMUI ~ 1 { 1 G {'.it ` '.r• ' rY ` A^COUNr 'AMOUNT INT + ~ t, rr q L,v l lM ,f rf'tlnC $ ' ° 4 + ^Ir 1,iii r TOTAL' PARIS 6 ~ 1 6 tr 11 ` c+ ' 1' r kr: 1F'> ACCCf +rj rt rt 1 lyt OIf.OrL{f11wf1 + i1~ 6.4 fORlsf AOr.AI{l bM 11319 1pR 091 R'IAMAG[ f0 CAAI OA f '•y OTS. OIL 1. AA 3101.11 It IT It crAS IN CASC,01 1101 , flit I OR r' t. i+ i 4 OAS! S. L. ' AMY IrMtR CAufs 19rONf OUR C041 0 4#11q f ORUff 6 CA II. GAS Q I NM III {r lnerl/o. 11-1 61,4o, 14#41 work to to J,., oleo, rIM • ti. INI IM1,11 ntfe.184 fad 'MVr3/ $1111 MOM III/, 16W krM1 ' ' r " f+1 rl'' Rs eA pF{ Y+: r s n r 1 IMlu6 kbr, •4114 H 114144, 151 Olt or'ukrk te,14 dn"Bad oft Y- 6114.16. Allgw:p At 61,4.1,01 fell 11.1'041",1 If Ld1.1 "J/', t 2" , + 1•' r''•' rit r + rs tN ORf ASI 6", AFj'4 ♦ IMIr MIA.'A1 Igryli n641.01'k 1141, 14 AlI1hY .rd11 R1t{ed All a., ~;rA A' l a.{:A~~ i . i~ l7, i + t . It tM of hvoA » 16400mI trnl/el 41 /bdn IA 114 r. • ~-t.-~ _ N Y M1 r r. f 1: 4 r ~irt•r ft E4~. IAX a+iS, 4 i, I 9~f', 9 /T 1- 14 ~Y4 f•' (`I fy~` .ice ~xf . r ~ T4T~A t R •,k 0 r lttr CSCR RT104 PA ICC 3 q ' -IrAATS P C Lcy 1747 1871 0)2 PLPIh cnd (OK ) 2XA u 31 ~51 ISO l COI ,Slnt/`I/ ~_WQ ''PJZ}_ _ `~rl (606) 293-3247. IUBRIC ATI ❑ - ry(~J!j -A ~U ~I-- ~ 7T 1,nr,[~~/~ ._~S!1'-~.. _ • :.~•1 C;,ANGF OII-_D + . 1 ~L I CILIAT;4151 OIL CART , w y T e4GC[L r f 9E1, L,I;O •Ae wtr I[CF IVIG TRANS 01l t 3 1Y 3_Y/ o ~La - - Tom- -n N CN. Nr,t _ rw o.ll Ell. 1 k W iIVC, MGCIL TIu A WIIC IAOw ICSO . F W J'AC'K 7AON- ` ~ f, )-1.110 i J, I is ~ K wNFI[ eats, ADJUST r ~ YI Ao II4l0OmsT1A 'LIC[NIC NO. ,IPmS" re ONt NwAw AAA, CRAKIS l.J ` / ell ' I rf `y .r ` e,rbf❑ rvod . ~ ^ 01 r.•. tutr, epee ko, okou w,~Trtk lrw I r~loAC ^n w j WASH • 3, f a ' y 04 - I' OR[R NO 1,{rfrnuCnONL + ~~H 1. POLISHS" .Q .1 TrAi1 1 1l C t .r r o rs r•'r i I {y , T j IJ III t 1 , •,1 f 1 r f s~~~. D I Y.4 .r. I 1 ;'I:v X •'~~F"5. t ,;•f t, 1v f + 1 w"'• \t „"i, j a 1 .Y,.y . 11'!'}. 1 t`f 1 fr A .1 ~ 1 m r f -'-^V~.~.L---*`- I I• r~i .1 nwCi'ffj. Y!'f T.~r, - 1„ .'S L h l i, 4 P♦\ I r l Ir J ~ ~ 11 Y 7 I 1.'. 1'. rI yr'•i °r( t •k 'i I'r. Lr. r r.r < r > t'~ L,j .1' 'l r m F r S j 0 4.. ^ AecllfoNlu i r r TT r , , t / 1 1 ,,II , r, ♦ 1S} y •I ' `9] 1-. .y I S ' e' Yf;. r i. ' ' /1 F 1~ rtt5 ~j---~- 4 I r 1 • } 15 ,i ! +,',.e ` .7 , A la rA Irv f. ,'d1~1 ri f s• e 1 1 Ir 1 } 51 ~ ~ r I''I Jr 'rte, Y ~ L, 44 ~I ~,•Ir II,T S f f \I}Iij7i I .T1 15 . yl r.f . f ":r f rr L 51 ' , ~T•1F a 1f y S; ' ti I v • IVSIIT AtIA1R/ " ' I ~ '~S C _ Acco r d a t t` hdC f s r .f 'r t r ' OF 7 r ArJOUHT I 1 1+T, I i CLH t $ r, r ty ' ✓ - ( i 1 ' 1 I ' 1-r•--`--"'~ T t? 1 "f \ I 11: TOTAL 11 r i r rh~• OIL- i. J T I t y r y. l I j t ~L i.~ I IADOR ^ y~ ate: i.O J .i J, 1 1 . y{ ♦ S.f. .\1 1 ll `•'T-~~ ' f. y}I L'.111 ; I er TOTAL, r~ 'r ,r„', ~T t.IV , T/t,l 7 PARTS 1 r" t: ti il, r ..-•f r•d-t 1 'n f':S 7 ' 1, , ✓r ACC[A , y f r• ILLbII IOII AIC 1 kOh RIrORSIRI 0tR LOSS 011 OANAr1.TO CARS OR r'' y ' ♦ IORI[4 I t. s 4 \'I • f r AAl ICl11 LCIT, IM' EIAI' It CAST Of F.RE,TN[FT,OR ; Q T AS' OIL• + r • t . . • QTf. OIG a 1" ANT OTIIIR lAI FI lLrONO OUR COk TlIOL 1' i 1 I M117 1.111,114 In1 ItIrP milp III to 11 11^/ 1q RI MVl1 i I: ~N 'f,r rI CUALtT'T • f d . j.' CAIN. QAf 'I Is r'Ir11 1,1111TIr mU lnl11, Inl RI}Ilf lrlll 111 1,1/k FnlQ lm. I~S of jtr'' R[RAIR>1 I' IT I•' ~ , t•' • { ~ • !•1 "'r 1 ✓,1 ('w~ II IMq 1l1,, i• lIllrt/r1 FIN i, nini,~ it 16111'j rl44 /ap ';r t ` f 1:1 'j ~ u ; 5'. Y ✓ ! ~ 1 7. ' F rl j v. +a 1 •;1 1 EAIAJ~ f1i/111f11.'Am,a Plot ,enAlnlf'I (Ilrn •D;fIbY pSrw dwp 7 < 111 rl~+.T ,,,N 1. '*1 ' 't,~ [C•. pj ry/.~- 1' ,r.f I -~fy~ 1 1 n. t-^ 1jI y , Ilfn (lr it In 11 to III rI NI lmlln) It bl drl IRlydl 0 ~ I . L~ y '1 f 3 1l J; ,f' f ~.e,1 r1, 1 fr ,e 1'. 'a P r i. 1 , y,'(, "1 f• 1 t• 1,Q y r~' \•ZT/•R `(1 ~~I'.;7fj ~ /K ~♦1i 4G. . Iy'r ,S.' 1. 1 1~' fl t r r ~.'~'Y i i•. 4 .✓.~~11 ♦f q ~y ft ~ r',~ Oe t'r q. ~t' y,\; 'i 1 ..r' T h;,•1' jl~'✓tS1 Ir}_MT T1 J V.,~. rr d, i7: t.,•. TOTALv+ Sr if 'S :TI