HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-07-1979
AGENDA
CITY OFDENTON 7CI Y COUNCIL
August r
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council Tuesday, August 71 1979, at
7;00 P.M. in the Council. Chambers of the Municipal Building. Broadcast live
on KNTU Radio. 1979; the Jul 1. Consider the minutes of the Regular that Special Called 17rM1979,} he
Emergency Meeting of July 13,
July 240 1979; and the Special Called Meeting of July 30, 1979.
2, Public Hearings:
A. Consider the City of Denton participation in a program of
municipal mortgage Financing.
j B. Z-1410. This is the petition of Mr. Robert Horn requesting an
amendment to a Plamed Development district located on the
fivenjacres. :Petitioner
north side of f100 apartmentndunsor its eonxtensio
which permits
seeks er, amendment to permit 116 units.
This is the petition of Dr. V. W. Redman requesting
C. Z-1406' changes on 3.766 acres located near the
three zoning
Dallas/Hopkins Drive intersection%
1. A angresr located (A) to cornery of Dallas
1.37
and Hopkins Drive,
Agricultural (A) to General Retail (GR) on
i 2. A change from 1.773 acres beginning 40' north of the Dallas/Hopkins
Drive intersection=
begins (230 feet north f Retail
3. (GR) one .623fromacrLightwIndustrial (LI) to General
Dallas0. Ins intersection.
I
Bob Smith requesting a
D, Z-1405. This is the petition of Mr.
change in zoning from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development located at classirsectionfiofcatR)ckingbird bird end Audra. This POh issP opo
e ion on IS acres for single family homes on lots 6,000 square feet in size.
E. Z-1408. This is the petition of Mr. Dale C"for Ing29S
sidenof Highway Ll77x ad scent and
acresslocatediaonithe north Light
east of Eonnie Brae.
~I
t
City Council Agenda
August 7, 1979
Page Two
F. S-133. This is the regc,st of Ms. Kaye Conaway requesting an
amendment to the specific use permit which authorizes a day
nursery for 34 children at 707 Carroll Boulevard. Petitioner
seeks an amendment to permit 50 children.
G. Z-1407. This is the petition of Ms. Linda Lavender requesting
a change in zoning Prom Multi Family (MF-1) to Single Family
(SF-7) at 609 West Oak Street.
H. Z-1409. This is the petition of the Municipal Police
Department requesting a change in zoning from Multi Family
(MF-1) to Light Industrial (LI) classification on 2.5 acres
located on the west side of Woodrow, .3 miles south of
McKinney.
3• Consider a recommendation from the Library Board relative to the
construction of the Library additions. 71 I
4. Receive a report from the Airport Advisory Board on Airport
Management.
5. Consider directing the City Manager to develop a plan for assuming
the management of Denton Municipal Airport.
6. Receive and consider a request from Jess Coffey regarding water and k
Sewer service on North Sherman Drive.
7. Ordinances;
A. Consider an amendment to the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
in order to adopt the new Federal Insurance Rate Map and new
flood boundary and floodway maps.
{ B. Z-1396 - Carroll Goan. Consider adopting an ordinance
amending the zor ~g map on approximately 3.108 acres of land
from Single Family "SF-7" to Multi-Family Restricted "W-A".
8. Resolutions:
A. Corsider approving a resolution amending Sections 1 and 3(e)
of a resolution passed and approved March 6, 1979 authorizing
the Series A Bonds of the North Texas Higher Education
Authority, Inc. in the principal sum of $100000.00.
B. Consider a resolution terminating the agency agreement with
Aerosmith Denton Corporation.
i
I
~ j
3
h {
NMI
City Council Agenda
August 7, 1979
Page Three 1
C. Consider a resolution authorizing settlement of the harper Et.
Al. lawsuit,
D. Consider a resolution authorizing the acquisition of property
located on Woodrow lane for an animal shelter.
9. Consider a preliminary site plan for the animal shelter and J
~
authorize the architect to proceed with plans and specifications.
10. Consider site plan approval for a portion of Planned Development 24.
I
11. Consider site plan approval for a portion of Planned Development 2. 1
12. Consider deannexation request of Mr. Richard Brodie regarding 25
acres located along Highway 377, in southwest Denton County.
13. Consider disposition of excess City property located at the
southeast corner of Oak and Avenue E.
14. Consider acquisition of several property parcels for channel
improvements to Pecan Creek in the vicinity of Pecan Creek.
15. Consider recommendation of the Planning Commission regarding
placement of :signs on property proposed for rezoning.
I
16. Consider an amendment to the contract with Shimek, Jacobs and
I Finklea to include an apron area at the airport in the engineering
plans.
17. Bid 60674, Consider awarding bids for Sanitation Compactors and
Containers.
18. Consider setting the August 14, 1979 Study Session Agenda. ;
F 19. Consent Agenda
j Each of these items is recommended by the 5:aff and approval
thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
I recnmr>ndations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City '.Mager or his designee to implement each item in accordance
k' with the Staff recommendations.
A. Referrals.
1. 2-1412. This is the petition of Mr. Grant Jacobson requesting
a chango in zoning from Single Family (fir-7) and Planned
I Development (PO) for zero lot line residential use to Multi
Family (W-1) classification on five acres, This tract is ,
located 4M, north of Windsor Drive and 450' west of Stuart
I ,
Road.
I
I
I
City Council Agenda
August 71 1979
Page Four
i
2. Z-1413. This is the petition of Mr, John Stout
rP„,=t1-CQ--QMgntj ,and. Agricultural (A) zoning on 1.58
acris located on the' south side of U.S. 380 near the
intersection of 380 and Cindy Lane. The tract begins
240' south of University Drive and measures 230' x 30001,
I
3, Z-1414. This is the petition of Mr. Robert Cobb
requesting a change in zoning from Single Family (SF-7)
to Neighborhood Service (NS) classification at 1021
Cleveland Street.
B. Bids/Purchase Orders.
1. P.O. 439755 to Shermco industries in the amount of
$3,175.70 for emergency repairs for water production.
2. P.O. P39549 to Emoo Mfg. Co., inc. in the amount of
$3,045.24 for a hydraulic engine for solid waste
compactors.
C. Plats,
1. Consider final subdivision replat of Blocks 6 and 8 in
the Meadow Oaks Addition
2. Consider final subdivision plat of Oak Meadows Addition.
i
20. Executive Session
A. Legal
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
0. Board Appointments
21, Consider Board Appointments.
i
i 203
city council
' July 17, 1979
Regular Meetinngg of the Cityy Council of the City of Denton, Texas Tuesday, July
17, 1979 at 7;00 p,m. intlie Coaxll Chnmber of the hkmlcipel BulIding.
PRESCYft c113 ity IllnaQcrlCyyhrisPHartung SeA iing'CitCMbtTS y Attorney,BuStTt And rc Soloo" a~dlCity
Secretary Brooks Holt.
1. lbtion was made by Stephens, seconded by Honsloy that the minutes of the
regular meeting of July 3, 1979, the special called joint meeting with the County
Comm
meet ntheicnkrgcwyrmeeting of-Juno 21,tl 9pbclapprooved, btlon carried,lD, 1919
2. PUBLIC H0'ARINCS.
(A) A public hearing was hold on Z-1399, the petition of Henry S.
Miller Coc~any, requesting a cluamgo in toning from Agricultural (A) to Genera
Retail (GR) on 14.5 acres located on the south side of 1-35B at its intersection
with Loop 288.
(I) The Mayor opened the hearing.
f (Y)
,d, David W. Dunning of Henry S. Miller Company explPinod tha plans.
Richard Johnston, Southridge resident, stated that homeowners should
Q expect integrityy of their property. "we see no need for commercial zoning across
Q from the big mall on the other side of 1.351.11
No other person spoke, pro or con.
• The Mayor closed the public hearing.
j.
Jahn LevretFa, City Planner, sated that letters were mailed, with 2
returned in favor and none in opposition, and that the Planning and Zoning Canm•
lssicn•recoamendCd approval 4 to 2. Ho said that sewer service- is available, and
streets in the viicinity are adequate to develop this tract.
The Planning and Com=ity Development Departments did not support
the toning change as submitted,
Discussion:
Stewart••Thia area is not suitable for commercial; it needs each move-
ment of earth.
Stephens.-We already have line of demarcation. This is not the best
and highest use for this property. I am not opposed to progress, however.
Vets--t like this property. I will work for it if they develop 11SP•1611.
I will work with the Company for cemnorciai zoning, but t will vote against this
E particular request.
Nash••hmould you be willing to table this until "SP-16" zoning is work-
ed out?
Yela•-t don't think so. If we table It, you will bring back additional
information. i don't ►ant to make s rash decision.
Oction was made by Vela, seconded by Stewart.to deny the petition.
Wtion carried S to 2.
' (B) A public hearing was held of 1.14040 the petition of Mr. lease
Coffey, concerning a 17.7 acre tract located on the west side of Sherman Drive,
1100' north of Hercules;
Petitioner seeks a toning change from Agricultural (A) to Multi
Family (}8'•1) on 2.9 ncres adjoining Sherman Drive;
Petitioner socks annewition and Matti Family K--1) zoning on 14.9
acres adjoining tho tract in (1) io tho west.
i
I
I
2 0 4 July 17, 1979 Continued
1
The Mayor opened the hearing,
I
George Hopkins, local attorney, spoke for Mr. Coffey, stating that
since land involved is adjoining loop 288, it is not suitable for single family ,
usage,
Two persons spoke for the homeowners, irsdieatSnp opposition to the
petition and presenting a petition with 240 names opposing t.
The Mayor closed the hearing,
John lavratta, City Planner, stated that 4 letters were mailed, with I
returned in favor and 1 in opposition, therefore, it will take a 4/3 vote of the
Council to approve the request, lavretta advised that utilities can be provided
and the street is adequate.
Motion ins made by Stewart, seconded by Hensley to deny the petition. i
Motion carried.
(C) A public hearing was held on 2-1403, the petition of Mr. Sorour
PartoviI ro.uesting a chance in toning from Multi Family OF-2) to General Retail
(Q) classification on .6 acre located an the southeast corner of Eagle and
• Avenue B.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. After hearing 1 speak in favor
and none in apposition, the Mayor closed the hearing,
John lavretta, City Planner, advised that of the notices mailed, 4
but no one opposition,
were returned reco mended favor W 3 in
spoke in opposition atgt edPtoning 4 2 meeting.
Motion was made by lensley to approve the petition. Motion died for
lack of a second. j
Motion was then evade by Vols, seconded by Stewart to deny, the petition. 1
lotion carried 4 to 1.
3, The Corincil considered the request of !like Workman relative to the City's
financial support of the Greater Denton Arts Council.
Mr. Workman stated that he had been named Executive Director of the
Greater Denton Arts Council, but was fired in a short time without just cause.
He advised that he had filed a use In court. io said, "If t win the case the i
• cost will be rid by public tax money. The Arts Council needs to be im ostigatrd.
am asking the Council to do this." ;
Acting City Attorney Burt Soloman advised the Council not to discuss
the 'matf er.
Mayor Nash said that he supported the Arts Cowell 1001.
~ i
1 4. The Council considered an appearance by county Judge Jerry J. Crawford
relative to County wide aniimal control.
Judge Crawford said he was appears, before the Council in behalf of the
that a fair fee toothe CityishouldCbe considered t derea City- d for thistserrvvicehifthe City said
help out,
City Manager Ilarttng advised that there are legal stabilities involved
in this. I need to check. Our present facility is inadequate, but wo hope to
have a new one under construction in a few months. We do recognize concerns in
i the County.
Mayor Nash••Ke would like to work with the Canty.
f Vela••1-undcrstarrd that we have Denton citizens being treated for rabies
~I in Denton,
The Mayor requested that the Manager report to the Coanaik at the next
study session relative to this mater.
Frances Darden of the Ihenano Society sold that persons bringing in on
onimol suspeettd of rubles could sign a release to the City,
i
I
i
i
205
July 17, 1979 Continued
S. The Council deleted from consideration a precentation from tho Denton
Mall Company con:eminpiFaTity's participation in widening existing Loop 288
adjacent to the Golden Triangle W1 development.
6. The Council considered a re it on the status of the Central Fire
Station and providing lirection for the Staff,
City Itnnager It+rturg stated th.it the architect's estimate shows the
project is to be approximately $200,000 over the budget, (5527,000 vs, 1729,000).
Architect Gerald Stone presented figures with reductions, coming up
with a figure of approximately $S54,000 plus $6,000 for Plaster Hut acquisition
ad $0,000 for demolition. lie also spoke of deleting the administrative area
originally scheduled to be the top floor.
the Manager said that the administrative people could stay in the
present building for a~ least a year.
Nash--Could Beds be switched from one bond issue to another?
liarturg••No. People voted for a new fire station.
Nash--Should we consider cost of Certificates of Obligation or Warrants?
Q liar tmg••1opefully we can work out the funding problem. j
Q Iot.,•; was made by Veto, seconded by Hensley to proceed with construction
and that the City Manager look for the best possible way to finance, but that
other monies already allocated not be affected. Motion carried.
7. ORDINANCES:
The following Ordinances were presented:
(A) Ordinance 079.49 (George Goen)
r AN ORDINANCE 4M. ING THE ZONING IIAP OF TIE CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME 1615
ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO 7112 00118 OF ORDINANCES OF TIE CITY OF DENIM TEXAS,
BY d1DINA4CE NO 69.1 A4D AS SAID MVP APPLIES TO CITY LOT 8, BLOCK 394, AS SDOwN
E rum DATE ON T7i Orn&AL TAX W OF 71C CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, Mu ma PARTICLUMY
EI DESCRIBED TlMMIN; a\U DECLARING AN UPEC NNE DATE.
' Motion was made by Stephens, soeonded by Nash that the Ordinance be
passed, an roll call vote Vela "a'e", lensley "aye, Stewart "aye", Stephens
'ayd' and Nash "oyd'. Motion ca ed. i
i
I
(B) Ordinance 179-SO (Calusa Dovelolment, Inc.)
1 AN ORDINNCE AMENDING TIM ZONiNO IWP OF 71E CITY OF DFf"o TEXAS, AS SAMI WAS
ADOP= AN AP
APPRO71MACITY OF Y ACRES OPT ND INKY
ORDINAN NCE NO 91~AND ASGS I~ APPLIES TCES OF
CITY W 6, BLOCK 2850 AS 50N 11115 DATE' ON TILE OFFICIAL TAX MV OF THE CITY OF
1i ~Q4, TEXAS, AND MARE PARTICUHAIY DESCRIBED 111REIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFDCrM
Mayor Nash said that la was abstaining became of engineering work.
Motionwas made by Stewart, seconded by Stephens that the Ordinance
be passed. On roll call vote Stewart "aye", liensley "aye", Vola "aye' and Stephens'
"ayd". Motion carried with Nash abstaining.
(C) Ordinance 079.51
AN ORDINANCE OF TIM CIV OF OFMON, TEXAS, PROVIDING PM 711E C1.06IfY3 AND VACATING
OF A PORTION OF TIE 11f1L1:1 FA.SI:ik?'Nf IN LOP 6, BLOCK E, GRANT ESTA*ES ADDITION TO
7118 CITY AND COUNTY OP DImmoN, TLW; PROVIDING FOR THE REVERSION P 11E rCE TO {
SAID tMD; ALrnk)RIZING WESWY LEGAL DOCl1Nk S TO BE PREPAP.P11 A'. SIGNED; AND 1
PROVIDING AN IiFr1YI'Mi D17" {
Motion was We by Stewart, seemded br Stephens that the Ordinance
be passed. On roil call vote Vcla "aye", lensloy 'aye", Stewart "aye", Stephens
"aye" and Nash "ayd'. Motion carried,
b~
20C July 17, 1979 Continued
(D) Ordinance 179.52 +
AN ORDINANCE OF 71E CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY Of DEMON, TEXAS, CREATING A NEW 1
SECTION 20.2 OF 010.0 20, ARTICLE I ENTITLED "SALE AND DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS I
'REAL PROPERTY OP Mn CIIY"; PROVIDING A SMRABILITY CLAUSE AND DECLARING AN
EFFi AT- DATE, '
lttyor Pro Tcm Stephens stated that the Council should not act until
verification and certification by the City Attorney and the City Secretary is
given.
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley that the Ordinance
be passed. On roll call vote Vela "nay", Stewart "aye", Hensley "Aye", Stephero
"aye" and Nssh "aye". Mtion carried 4 to 1. I
VeIa,said, "it Is difficult for me to vote on any Resolution or i]
Ordinance where ?Iayor Nash indicates that he is abstaining,"
8. RESOLUTIONS:
(A) The following Resolution retaining Jack Cray of the firm of Cray,
Whitten and Loveless to represent the City of Denton in the AVER ELAE CARRE•TI vs.
CITY OF DEMON lawsuit was presented:
AT A REMW MEETING OF 7113 CITY COUNCIL OF 11E CITY OF MM* IEXAS HELD IN
1188 E1hICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, A.D. 197 .
RESOLUTION
MIERFAS, the City of Denton, Texas has been sued by AVER 141E Gr1RRETT and the City
Attorney has advised the City Council that the legal department Is neither staffed
nor available to represent the City's interest In said litigation; and
M E". ; the City of Denton must adequately defend JA said litigation by counsel
experienced in such matters; and
MOVAS, the City Attorney has entered into a tentative agreement with Jack Cray
of the firm of Cray, Whitten and Loveless to represent the City of Denton in tha
litigation mutter listed below; and
I
M03 M- the best Interests of the City of Denton will be served by retaining the
abovesald counsel, for the purpose of representing and defending the City therein;
• NOW, THEAEpORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY MM IL OF TIM CITY OF DEN ON, TEXAS,
MAT:
1. Jack Cray of the f1m of Cray,, Whitten and Loveless be retained as
special trial counsel to represent the city of Denton and to take such action as
he and the City Attorney may deers necessary to fully protect the interests of the
€k City of Denton in the following mwood we: AVER EIRE G1RRtTp VS. CITY OF OP:"o '
TIMS, DT AL.
2, All reasonable attorney fees and expenses of said litigation be paid
by the City of Denton, Texas.
PASSED AND APMIM 7111S 710; 17M DAY OF JULY, A.D. 1979. MAYOR
• AT'IT,': C17Y OF Dem, TEXAS
i
a
CITY OF MNION, TEXAS
A/PPpM D AS TO LEGAL FOV: 1
CITY OF DLVON, MW
i
• s
I
i
" I
k July 17, 1979 Continued 207
be passed. OnMotrollion
,ayeA,sNenley biyd',uStewartt"aye`% Stepheens
"aye" and Nash 'We". Motion carried,
f[nn of Canty, Haanngero]ih, in,t1AtCollinsSe oirIIepresentJthe City of~ Denton in
the Gary L. Matheson vs, Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Co mission of
The City of Denton, Texas, et el lawsuit was presented:
AT A REWLAR )6MING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DFNICIV, TEW, IMM IN
TIE HNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON I1C 17TH DAY OF JULY, A.D. 1979.
RESOLUTION
MEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas has been sued by GARY L. AM7ESOli and the City
Attorneeyy and Clty Manager have advised the City Council that the legal department
4 neither staffed nor physically available to represent the City's interest in
said litigation; and
h MiLREAS, the City of Denton must adequately defend in said litigation by counsel
M experienced in such matters; and
MEREAS, the City Attorney and City 7lanaaer have entered into a tentative agree.
w went with S. G. Johndroa, Jr., of the fins of Cantey, Hangar, Gooch llaut and
Q Collins to represent the City of Denton in the litigation listed below' and
Q MEREAS the best Interest of the City of Denton will be served by retaining the
abovesaid counsel for the purpose of representing and defending the City therein;
NY 71MWCREo M IT RESOLVEn BY TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DFNIUN, TEAS,
I
I. S. G. JohMroo, Jr. of the flora of Cantey, Hangar Gooch, Munn and j
Collins be retained as special trial counsel to represent the City of Denton and
to take such action as he and the City Attorney may deem necessary to fully pro.
tect the interests of the City of Denton in the following named ease on o alt
f GARY L. FNTIESON VS. FIRia97r'S AM POLICD4N'S CIVIL SERVICE MISSION OF THE
CITY OF D[NI'CN, TE W, ET AL. I
2. All reasonable attorne fees and e
appeal be paid by the City of Denton, Texas. xpenses of said litigation an f
I
P&M AND AMOVED this the 17th day of July, A. D. 1979. i
r
ATTEST: CITY OF DFNW, TWS
IR'Tf3LT
CITY OF MM, Try.44
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
L11
a i
CITY OF DEMON, IUM
} Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Stephens that the Resolution
be passed. On roll call vote Vela "aye", Ilensiey I'dye", Stewart "aye", Staphens
"aye' and Nash "aye". Notion carried.
I
(C) 1.1 ;ataxil considered a, volution al,thorialsna the purchase of
property at Bolivar +Id McKinney for the f .,tral Fire Station.
Motion was mide by Stewart, seconded by Vets to table the matter,
I Motion carried.
1
I
~d,..°wP.ri.'.. w.n~.ti.:RU..:wMS ...wr... n. n.. ._n.
i
I
,
n>~
,
203 1
July 170 1979 Continued
' 9. The Council considered instituting annexation proceedings concerning
the request of Mk, Robert Watch, 2-1101.
The Council held a public hearing on toning and annexation request by li
Mr, welch on June 26, 1979. No action on this request could be tal•en following
completion Df the public hearing. Now the Council can institute formal annexation
proceedings by instructing the City Attorney to publish the Ordinance then the 1
annexation and toning Ordinance will be returned to the Council for final action
in late August.
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley to instruct the City
Attorney to institute annexation proceedings by publishing the annexation Crain-
ante. Motion carried,
10, The Council considered site plan approval for a portion of Planned
Development 23 located on Carroll Boulevard,
' The Council discussed egress and ingress and sire of the curb cuts,
City Planner John lssion recommended approval of thetsubmitted tSits plan with nthe followiinng conditions:
(A) Site plan approval is granted for the proposed develop&nt
of a limited retail development. Tie building arrangement and
site, drives, setbacks, and parking layout shall conform to
the submitted site plan,
(B) A pole sign, the combined panels of which do not exceed 80
square feet in sisal may be erected far advertising purposes a
mininum 20 feet from the front property line.
Motion was made by Hensley, seconded by Nash to approve site plan of
3 PD-23 with conditions as shown above. Motion carried.
li. The Council considered final revised plans for Windsor Drive construct-
ton.
The MWyor stated that he was abstaining because of engineering work.
Mayor Pro Tem Stephens took the chair.
• approved a reductioin in thkscope ofsworkdosWirdsorhDrive. 2baertItgwathfound'ail
• tlnet the developer was required to pay $440,000 toward the construction of drainage
facilities, The Staff has rq•tvaluated the project and reccrmeads reinstating
i *Na proximately 4S01 of storm Sewer. The reduction of this contract was $90,000
I! n ThCitty~srcosttisnestimated tobboa129000contrlbutfon of !20,000 by the developer,
Motion was made by Hensley, seconded by Vale to approve the revised
recommended plan for Windsor Drive. Motion tarried with Nas abstaining,
U. ?ho Council set the Agenda for the July 24 Study Session.
13. CQWX AC M:
Motion was made by Vela, seconded by Stephens that the following
Consent Agenda be approved, Motion carried.
(IS) RMRAALS
Th following far petitions were referred to the Planning and
s~ conning Commissions for its reccmwdatt^nsn
(1) 2.1408, tho petition of Mfr. Date Cuvtingh,•um, requesting annex.
ation and Light Industrial (LI) toning classification for 295 acres located on
the north side of High-my 77, adjacent and east of Sarnia Brao Road,
(2) 2.1409, the petition of the MWcipol Police Department request-
ing a chvrge in toning from Multi Polly (W-1) to Light Industrial (L1) classi-
fieaticn on 2,3 acres located on the west side of Woodrow i,ano, apppproximately .3
mile south of McKinney Street, This site is proposed for a City Aeinal Pound.
i
I
209
July 17, 1979 Continued
(3) 2-1410, the petition of Mr, Robert Horn, requesting an amend-
ment to a Planned Development (i'D)) zoning district located on the north side of
the proposed Windsor Drive extension, west of Stuart. PD toning, authorlsing 100
apartment units on a five acre site which begins 405' zest of Stuart, was approved
in 1978. The petitioner seeks an amendment which would permit 116 apartment units,
(4) 2.1411, the petition of Mr. Bob Smith, requesting a change In
zoning from Airiculhual (A) to Ilulti family (MP•3) classification of 6,5 actos
beginning 600 north of Universit Drive and 600' north of University Drive and
600' west of the western edge of North University Place Addition.
(B) BIDS/PUR441St ORDCRS:
(1) Purchase order 018177 was approved to General Electric for
turbine and valve parts in the amount of $13,976.
CC) PLAT'S
(1) Final subdivision plat of the M. K. Wilson Addition approved.
co (2) Final subdivision replat of the John Ready Addition appt•aved.
M 24, The Council considered cup roval of County resident, Michael J. O'Keefe's
W request to connect to City's tower Me.
Director of Utilities Bob Nelson stated that Mr. O'Keefe had paid ppro-
j Q rats to correct to a 10" sewor line, along Ryan Road. He paid a total of f1,5S8.
which includes a 4" sewer tap.
Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Vela that the repxst of Mr.
O'Keefe to corsnect to the City sewer line be approved. Motion carried.
15. The Council considered adopting a Council Policy with regard to open
meetings and executive sessions.
Vela voiced concern relative to informmtion being liven to The Enterprise
of proceedings in executive sessions. Ila said, 111 believe there should be no more
closed meetings unless in ordinance is passed providing some type of punishment for
anyone who reveals informoti,~n discussed in executive sessions.
Stewart stated that he wns concerned along with Vale mid that something
is seriously wrong. Ile said, "Clouds of confusion can be built since the public
is not present at these executive sessions,' We have not done anything wrong."
Motion was made by Vala thrt an ordinance be passed to do away with
executive sessions, Motion died for lack of a second.
16, the Council recessed into executive session io discuss pending litigation,
land acquisition, personnel and board appointments,
17, fhe Council reconvened into public session at 11M p.m. to azasousce
that no official action was to be liken.
Meeting adjourned at 11N5 p.m.
f.
CM SWROARY
s a a
I
202
City Council
July 13, 1979
rmcrCency lkotinR of the City Cocutcil or the City of Dimton, Texas, Friday, July
is, 1979 at 5:30 p,m, in tha Confcronco Room of ilia City Ikunarer's Ofrice of tho
WmieiPal building.
PRIES EM: ),byor Nash, Mayor Pro Tem Stephens, Hombar lknsleyl Assistant City lhnngor .
King Colo and Aclninistrative Aido Bill Angelo.
APSEM: Council Mokers Vela a:d :tewart.
1. '!ho Council considered the following Ordinance delaying for ono year tho
application of provisions under House Bill 1060, Article I, prescribing appraisal
of agricultural land:
ORDIXWE W. 79 48
AN ORDINANCB OF 711H CITY OF DENI'OYV, TEXAS, NOYIDING POP. TND PROVISIM OF ArlrICLC
1 j 1 OP H. B, 1060 RELATING TO TAXATION OF AGRICUL1VRAL LM'D MU FROVIDING Ali EnTCT14'E
• DATE.
!lotion was We by liens le(, seconded by Stephens that the Ordinance Uo
passed. On roil call vote Hensley 'aye', Stephan "aye" and Nash "aya". Motion
carried.
i
Meeting adjourned at 6:45 P.M.
MYOR
i
l
~ a a a ' i
%
j
is
2J0
City Council
July 24, 1979
Special Called Mooting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, Tuesday,
July 24, 1979 at 5:90 p.a.:rd A Special Called Joint Meeting o: the City Council
and the Public Utilities Boards Tuesday, July 24, 1979 at 7:50 p.m. in the Council
Chamber of the Municipal Build6.
PRE,%X: Mayor Nash, Mayor Pro Tra Stephens, limburs Vale, Hensley and Stewart;
City Manager Chris Harting, Acting City Attorney Burt Solo~cns and City
Secretary Brooks Holt.
MEETING OF TIE CITY CCUN.1L:
1. The Council considered a presentation by First Southwest Company concern-
Ing municipal mortgage financing.
prank Medanich, First Southwest Company and Associates gave information
relative to raqulreeants for implaoenntin the program and nt schedule of events for
the program. Representatives of Underwriter, First Southwest Copuy, Lamas and
Nettleton Administrators, and Park)nurst and Horton Bond Cassel were ?resent.
Medanich advised that House Bill 1876 has been passed approving Mortgage Revenue
Bonds sfin¢for construction of low and moderate family dwellings. He added that local
lending agilablliwoould ~ha die loans, and would City oflDDeennt to 3 1%i4~ no
f
No strong opposition was voiced to the plan, but Stewart, Vela and
Stephens and two citizens in the audience favored a public hearing on the matter.
Motion was mode by N.ssh that the plan be initiated and to proceed with
the program. Notion died ffor lack of a second.
Motion was then soda by Stewart, seeoMiwi by Vala to hold a public hear- i
ing on the matter in the next two reeks. Motion carried.
2. The Council considered it discussion on the financing of the Central Fire
Station. JJ
Frank Medwdch, First Southwest Camay, advised that the City could
finance with certificates of obligtation, but it needs to be determined if the City
can go on a cash plan. The Council must give notice of intent, adopt an ordinate,
advertise and set o eats to receive bids.
No official action was taken on the advica of Mr. Medenich.
agreement wThe ith Al iuidetc Grant red and Cmpany relating to requested servicoo. letter of
utility a system r of services was to explore the procedures of tramforring 66
of the
Notion was made by Vela, seconded by Hensley to authorize the City
Manager to sign a letter of agreemamt with Alexander Grant and Company. lotion
Carried.
4. The Council considered a report and recommendations from Alexander Grant
and Company relative to the Data processing study.
Assistant City %nager King Cole introduced Glenn Ps mar of Alexnder
Grant and Company. Copies of the study ware distributed to the Council and it
was revised.
Cole then presented Staff recavandstions to disczthrue aria of the
City's Oats Processing Department and to contract for service with Xerox. Cola
added tint professional coep,ter peapI@ have been difficult to obtain. He pointed
out that several professionals have left. Cole gave a review of costs of a Xerox
contract, stating that money could be saved. He advised that cost of Whousa
data processing work had increased 191 per year.
Discussion:
Vele.."stioned Mr. Farmer relative to comparative costs of in-house
operations and Xerox's costs.
1
I
ii
1
i
R
July 24, 1979 Continued 211
Hensley--If Xerox is not satisfactory, What would be the cost of irrstall.
inn MW own system?
Parmer--In excess of $100,000.
Hensley-By going with Xerox, would problems like ours be possible?
Parmer•-we project long use of the present system.
Velh-•lrhy can't we get qualified people?
Hartung--If we can provide services better than does our
try an outside service. system we should
Naah••Nrould it be feasible to tun one system another year?
efficient Yandacouulld san rwieyr muted that an irrhwusa operation could be more
Pa mer•-Yes, but you must have competent people.
M
Stephens--There must be more management involvement.
Notion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley to table the matter.
Ld Motion carried.
Q I
Q S. The Council considered the request of Denton County relative to County-
wide animal control.
l Assistant City Manager Cole--Ne could take a vary limited Meber of 1
I mimsts from trAncorporstsd towns for euthanasia only. He added that it has been
that Denton institute a p . Persons bringing a
=:","I ninais moat identify
properly, be willing to sign a disclaimer that they would not sue the J
City and then ant be a legal format to protect the City. We really do not have
1
the facilities other than to provide euthanasia. A fee of 55.00 would be charged
for this.
i
Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Vela to enter into an
with Denton County which includes requirements as advised by the Staff and eo t
direct the City Attar-wry to prepare an app, riate ordimme.
Morton carried.
I~
wThe ater and Thee lrCounil considered standing Ordinance 25.10 and 2S-78 regarding
h pro rats changes along state and federal higharays.
Utilities Director Bob Nelson requested that the Connell apprm an
i~ amendment that will allow the City to legally collect 1001 pro rat along state
and federal highways. He added that the Utilities board had recommended approval. {
The following Ordinance was presented;
4 ORDt1V= N0. 79-S1
AN ORDIWA M AhEODC ARTICLE V, G" M 250 SBCT106 76 AND 71 OF Tit CODE OF
CFMINAMA;ES OF THE CITY OF DtNItTi TEXAS PROVIDING A *9 PRO-RATA CHARM POR V AM
AMID MU hOfIWIONSI AND DBCLAR4AXl AN ~FF73 TrVE DATE.
Motion was merle by Ste", seconded by
puled. On roll nil ate Yela Stewart that the Ordinance be
" and Huh rye' . Motion carried, Hawley tya Stewart aY10 , Stephens
I
7. The following Ordinance was
of automobiles; Presented regarding continuation of taxation ;
MDM43 NO, 79.54
AN CRDIDim OF THE CITY OF Dt3r'I'Q*7 TM PROVIDING POA THE CCIQ1'INUANCE OF AD r
VAIZa TAXATION CN ALL AUIW819 MT A FAMILY OR INDIVIDUAL OW AND DOES NO'
Mb OR USE FOR PAODUCIION OF LNCOE; AND PROM M AN UTBCTIVE WE.
Motion was made by Vela, seconded by Gt hens that the Ordinancs be
passed. On roll call tote Hensley "aye", Stewart 'ayd', Vela "aye , Stephens
aye and Nash "aye". Mbtion carried.
f
ik
h
2.f
July 24, 1979 Continued
B. The Council considered the following Resolution extending an invitation
to Madabs, Jordan to participate -in the International Sister Cities Program u the
City of Denton's Sister City:
AT A SPECLIL hEETIta1 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T191 CITY OF MOV, TWS, HELD N 1M
MNIC1pAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, A.D. 1979.
h ABSOLUTION
NVUS the Sister City Concept was inauugguurraated by the President of the thited
States in I95d to establish greater friendship and understanding betwearn the peoples
of the United States and other nations through the medium of direct persona! contact;
and
hfffJtEAS, all succeeding U. S. Presidents have endorsed said program, to be conducted
foe t1e brood purposes of the exchange of ideas and people between the citizens of
the United S
` sites of America and the peoples of ocher rations; and
If 1dEREM to implement this program Denton and other communities in the limited
States raw bear requested by Sister Cities International to affiliate vith cities
in other nations of similar Carecteristics and mutual interest) gad
1dMUS, the City of Denton, Taxes, through its couxil, does re ogre and endorse
1
this Program with the hope that it will lead to a lasting friendship between the
people of Denton and Madabs, Jordan:
MOW, THEREFORE, EE IT RESOLVED BY TN1 CITY COMIL OF THE CITY OF LO=, TML4S, THAT.
SECTION I.
fiat this Council on behalf of the people of Denton, Taut does hereby extend an
invitation to the rsnent and the people of the City of Modaba, Jordan to
! participate with the City of Denton, texas, as its sister City for the purpose of
creating greater aural uderetanding between the peoples of our two great cities
and nations.
SECTION U.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to ad u official representative of Denton to Carty
out this program.
SECTION 111.
That copies of this Resolution are to be sent to the Wyor and Cmncil of the City
of Madaba Jordan, Sister Cities International in W"h ton, D. C., the Embassy
of Jordan: and the U. S. Embassy in Jordon.
PASSED AND APPRWED this the 24th day of July, A. D. 1979.
BILL mm, MMK
CITY OF MM, TEXAS
ATTESTn
WZM HDLTO CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DEYital, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL. FORM:
a ~
BURY~TEAr
Motion was merle by Stephens, seconded by Vela that the Resolution be
Passed. On roll ail vote Stewart "rye", Hensley "tye", Vela "oys", Stephens
sye" and Nash "aye". Motion tarried.
I
July 24, 1979 Continued 213
9. The Council considered the following Resolution authorising the payment
to Denton County for the City's share of the cost of Medical Services Coordinator:
AT A SPECIAL M Mrr% OF THE CITY COUXIL OF THE CITY OF pWCN ST•]WI MELD IN THE
"ICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON 711 24TH DAY OF JULY, A.D. 1979.
RESOLUTION
*0 EAS, the Cicy of Denton, Texas, mud the County of Denton, Texas currently
partad icipate in the Jointly approved Denton City/County Medical Services program;
said City/CouuCity of ty MedicaltServisces Progras;and for ►es one-half contribution to the
14IEREAS, the City of Denton has received a bill from the County of Denton for Its
one-half contribution of the total amount needed for the program;
NOW TIOEPME, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CWNCIL OF TM CITY OF DWM, TEXAS,
THAT: the (y) a tottaal of$S,26 9y g to she Countyof Denton as its one:half shiarre~tribution
I to the City/County MteMcal Services Program.
o;X PASSED AND APFRDVED this the 24th day of July, A. D. 1979.
Ls/
ATTEST: C1TY OP DPMY?!, TEXAS
C]TY'=TAfY~_
APPLtM AS TO LEGAL FML-
i
CIn R. Ulm, C179r.C77~ OF DMION,
Motion was made by Strphanz, seconded by Stewart that the Resolution be
Fused. On roll call vote ftuley "aye", Vela "aye", Stewart "aye", Stephstu
'aye" and Nash "aye". Motion tarried.
10. The Council censidered the following Resolution authorising the purchase
of property at Bolivar and WJ4vwy for the Central Fire Station
AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY CaWIL rF IM CITY OF MWON TPxas HEIR IN TW
Ml2TICIPAL BUILDIM OF SAID C11Y ON TtE 24TH DAY OF JULY, A.D. 1979.
RESOLUTION
vanhs, the City of Denton finds it necessary to rmhau a certain tract of land
L i located in the City of Denton, Tom, rand more fully described below; ad
I4tFRF.1S, the City council of the City of Denton is of the opinion that the best
!merest and welfare of the public will be sarved by the purchase of the parcel
of real estate described below, and
W
rger grw
ernuid City Denton 00and o~msr 0.00 is a fairies agreedlwvlue=of siu be described
Property;
NOW, 710MORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF IM CITY OF DFNICN, TEXAS
THAT.,
1. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to prepare whatever legal
docunents are necessaf to lets the transfer of property so described below
from the 0w,M r them to the ity of Denton
i
i
2];
July 24, 1979 Continued
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City
and CourttNyoct Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the we. Neill Survey, and Lb MlracltielI•to Irwin 2also bbeeng par dof &trac of land as conveyed
frets Glynn
Volume 764, Page !18 of the Deed Records of Denton County,lTaxaa anddaozv in
1
particularly described as follows:
BEGIbPhitdi of
at the northwest comer said tractgad ipoint of beginning lying in
the east right of way 1Le of BoIi Street srway line of Stt albeoract of lend comroYed
rom rnesMrt
eet tax to the Ciof by deed dated January 3, 1975
and rscordsd in volume 751, Page 137 of the Deed Records of Denton Canty, Taxis;
.a.• TrEaB north IV , 2 2 eas t along the north bounds
of 82.16 feet to a point far ■ coer same being tAemetheW of awtscloerer of said tanca
tract;
THQar@ south 0 31 38' out along the oast bounds
of 21.0 feet to a point for a coer same being the scuuttheeutscorne! of said tract; bcundoxy of 12816 ufeet to a th 89' S&I' t fors aalon tt sye out ri
tloin of said tract a distance
Street said point also being the southwest comer of said tway line of Bolivar 1
I tact, I
T14M north 0. 01' 39" west along the west boundary line of said tract same being
the east right of way a of Bolivar Street a distance of 21.0 feet to the place
of beginning and cone square feet of land, more or loss.
2.' The City of Denton is hereby Awther authoritod to pry Irwin
2itrelberger, as owAr of said described I~rcy, considatafon in the mount
+
ft ~w6,000.00 purchase price, plus any other necessary and »asanable coats of
fig.
3. This Resolution shall take effect lsnedlately fra and after Its
passage and approval in accordance with the provisions of the Denton City Charter.
PASSED AND APPWM this the 24th day of Jul A. D.
c 197
Yr 9.
a ILL I~ s NMASWH,
ATTEST: CITY OP DSfM, TEMS
jC11Y OF DOW, TEAS
ALLPP__RM AS To LEGAL RM. 1
JHT A"SZ~
CITY Op OENI'Cf1,TMS
Nation was msda by Stopbons, seconded by Henley that the Resolution be
passed. On roll Wl rots VVela •aye", Stewart "eye", Ikuley "aye", Stephans
aye and Nash Notion carried.
11 The Council considered extending the affected area for public hearing
suilouts from 200' to SO' for proposed toning changes.
1
City Plume Jahn Drvretu sugqggested that the Planning std Inning Co -
ission make recomwAstions to the Conc1.1, He Added that the cost would to
considerable and the work load would inerout. He advised that signs could be
Placed on property with inforution relative to toning application and date of V
the Planning and toning meeting.
Motion was rode by Stephen, seconded by Stewart to
matter
until a sign method Is studied. Motion carried. postpone the
r
r E
i
My 2+, 1979 Continued 213 cons easemenU dedicated for thidered
J
Golden Trifall anngnill e quit cWming the original
development: /
TIDANCE NO. 79.55
AN ORDINQa OF INS CITY OF DeMN, TEM. PROVIDLNG MR DE CLOSING AM VAC TM
ALL OF THE UTILITY Etse4 5 IN 1HE ORIGINAL FLAT OF M GOM TRIANGLE MALL OF
=CK 1 OF THE G=M TRLANCLE AMMON TO nZ CITY MI) CaM OF DEI TM;
PROVIDIM FOR TIM REVERSICN OF THE FEE TO SAID LAND- AL4Tq ZIM NECESSARY LEGAL
DOCtMMS TO BE PREPARED AND SIGNED; AND PROVIDING ~6 EFFECTIVE DATE.
Fassa. Omotion ill we by Stew awayrt~: seconded by Hensley that the Ordinance be Vola 'aye' and Nosh "aye". Motion carried; Stewart aye , Henslsy rye , Step),erns
JOINT MEETING no nc CITY COINCIL Arm ;TIE PUBLIC UTILITIES 8W".
PRESW: All the Council
M Utilities Board: Chairman George Krieger, Jim Nosh, Ed Coomee, E. W.
rr on, r., and Roland Laney.
W Oath of Office via administered to all Board Members by the City Secretary.
< I. The Council discussed the role of the Utilities Board, its relationship
a with the Council and other utters related to the Utilities system.
Discussion:
We do desirreetdirec Chairman thi Camp. ply for good corking relationships.
' Stephens.-Duties in outlined in the Charter. Utilities affect awry
citizen in Denton. We would llhe your Ideas an billing. You might consider
targeting on or" for customers to read their am asters.
Vela--Your job is extremely laQortant. Attention should be directed to
the fact that You were Mein ed by people who were elected by the people--all
the poop)#.
what Is goo war bad. Do what So on the job with fixed opinions, Also detarrine
you thirds is best for our City.
ey, I kwsr your have accepted the job with an open rind. Surch for
the best (Howl
Denton.
Mayor Nuh--You will face long range water supply, maintenance of our local
rystra and its and telephonw rates. We will welsh and act upon all your recaw.rWe
tions. We, however, will not be a rubber stamp.
ProJected,M Wye tam-aDentro tremendous uac a sa growth within a such shorter tin than
sage end we out face thaws together.
Krieger••We need to study the 1977 report an Demon's Utility system. TMFA
should provide the Board with copies of their agendas.
Mayor Nash-•kty Utilities Bard Member is welcome to attend TWA meetings.
election wJew
the result of sNaah- Vane ~lstwd us to represent all people. The last
- 7APA an the next 2erda in ardor totgett u ouch lnforeasat~ as po Nash . place
need to see the Gitbert Study. po ssible. We also
study end laodliarite ourselves wTN utilitiess adnto rtire *wmd to tthheJCConcil
Ye d endeavor to get answers on TWA for the citizens.
are releefveoo es iartUrtant that our Board help citizens understand where they
se ry commitment projects. We hope IMPA will hold night
meetings so citizens can attend.
JJ
i
I
r I
✓J V I
July 24, 1979 Continued
to look a1..d o~is~utlIitia se¢vrala~°elvei are difficult, temalber we have
population, irs power And water for an increased 1
l
The Council cw4%me4 not to hold the scheduled executive session.
Meeting adjourned at 16:1S p.m. _
i
i
I .
I I
3 p ■IIy 3 III / I 1
I
I
I I
I
t
I I •
I I
1
I
t I
I
+ i I
VV I
If
I
j
~ 1 1
kr
f
I
I
7
City Council
July 30, 1979
Special Called Meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, 7exas, Monday,
July 50, 1979 at 12:00 noon in the Conference Roos of the City Mannager'a Office
in the Mnsdtipal Building.
PR Mayor Pro Tea Stephens, Members Vsla, Hensley and Stewart; City Manager
Chris Hartung, City Assistant
Holg Cole, City Attorney Burt
Secretary Brooks Manager
Solomon and
AL M: Mayor Nash.
2. The Council considered the following Resolution providing for limited
county-wide animal control:
AT A SPECIAL ME£TINC OF THE CITY GINCIL OF Ili CITY OF De", TEXAS, HEIR IN
f TM KNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY CM THE 30TH MY OF JULY, A.D. 1970.
(Y) ABSOLUTION
M M02RW the City Council of the City of Denton has been asked by the Canty '
Cauaissioners of Denton County to provide assistance to the residents of Denton
County in disposing of animals farad within the said County; and
i a
MMPFAS, the City Cotacil believes it necessary to provide this usistanee For
the protection of the health, safety and welfare of all citizens of Denton Cavity;
NON, THEREM, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY WACIL OF THE CITY OF DEMON, TEXAS,
IMTn
1. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to inite a
progrea to provide assistance to all residents of Denton County requesting the
disposal of animals found within the said County.
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to adopt sdatem tions
and procedures are found to be necessary in order to offeettrta the saidro~aprograa
and prevent liability an the part of the City.
S. The City Manager is also hereby authorized to requite that a
room- able foe be paid to the City by any resident of Denton County requesting the
disposal of any such animals.
PASSED AND APPROM this the 30th day of Juay, A. D. 1979.
I
CITY Of DM N, TEXAS
ATTES n
NUAM HUM, iTY"SEQWL Y
CITY OF DWON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
CITY OF 0EN'fal, TEXAS
s
Motion was made by Stewart, secohbd by Howley that the Iwblution be
t gassed. On roll call vote Vela "aye", Stewart "aye", Henley "sys" and Stephen
aye". Motion tarried.
• E
Meeting ad}oinned at 1200 p.m.
;
1 1
j ~
i
1
I
WWI
I
I
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1410
August 7, 1979
Identity and location; Z-1410 J {
This is the petition of Mr. Robert Horn requesting an amendment to a i
Planned Development (PD) zoning district, located west of Stuart Dporive-
on the north side of the proposed Windsor extension. A five acre
r
tion of this PD beginning 250' west of Stuart, currently has approval
for a maximum 100 apartment units. The petitioner seeks an amendment
which would permit 116 units.
Recommendation:
As can be seen from the attached map which shows existing zoning in
the :vicinity of this request, the approved Planned Development permits
a variety of land uses. Zero lot line residential homes on lots
45' x 100' are under construction on Stuart Drive and are permitted on
the north and south side of Windsor for a total area of approximately
22 acres. In the area of the apartment site, zero lot line residential
development is permitted to the west and north, with a recreation and
greenbelt area for the apartment residents proposed to the east. Finally,
north of the zero lot line area, property is zoned for typical Single
e Family (SF-7) development.
If the five acre apartment site in this request was zoned MF-1, the
' standard apartment zoning classification, approximately 150 units could
be constructed on this site. The primary reason the Planning Commission
and City Council originally sought to limit the maximum number of units
to 100 was an effort to ensure that adjoining land uses in the PD remain
compatible. The requested amendment to this Planned Development would
add 16 apartment units over a five acre tract, amounting to an increase
of 3.2 units per acre--an increase from 20 to 23 units per acre. The
Planning Commission feels that the transitions provided among the dif. 1
ferent land uses in this PD are satisfacotry and that this requested
change is reasonable. If developed as currently proposed, at 23 units
j per acre, this would still result in a medium density residential
development. Public facilities are adequate for extension to serve
this site.
The Planning and Community Development Department expressed some reserva-
tions about the proposed amendment. Of two notices mailed to property
owners in this request, one das returned in favor and none in opposition. {
No one spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission hearing.
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended the City
Council approve zoning petition 2-1410.
i
r
IN. !
fl
1
1. q ;J. JI " t 4 L~MU ({4
M 1 .15.} \ S
n . * ~ja Jt 4 ry b
'YS'R ~rtfP j4Q~ ir~~l(' • T rF .X F v 3
ev.
k k..l r .r CYl v e bFr1 rl'
ri. 1 W a 1 1'ri ...<YuFfii~. .k4 \ `4~ ~F" i ♦ Y, r
j 1 - r S Y bF2 i 7'VJIONb~}
Y F Zj 2`, pit ' i SrgK4~5 yk { N° y• $
+ r z 1 Jt r r/ 44q b k r. r .4 a,
F r } cR Is
~yY YrS R t 1^:R^ F - Mrrr,~ li'r $
'
Ir,
x a z ~yt f CS ti+ rd 4~• 1' IY ~1 ~ T / ~ £ n ~ - '
\ f. R4`cS ;r~1"s'Y^ y S j ,wt 5~xr v.11~' A~ 1 r' # rl 7 r r
r yf°Fx~'"i r ,w b.} fl 1 Fr vjlr kf yT a
a $a r 5e .Y ~FA, ` j 1 ;,I 'W
R S + X 3 f
^ tr r I r 'ti C 1 E 6'n t r- ^ylra f s v J yEr' }5 `A r w tl i\ L a
L t
'rTY k IN
Cad i; n^ h~ r rl y' ~j rya +(b g,.~j.(rY r4f aR~ f ~F, rt t y
4 1 } x -
' AAa f r'! f r r' f' c t ! ^ 1 r .~vi k + !Z y t f~yf} too,
~ F f P k , ~ 1K~^ 111 rr ~ iF v T.lN ~F F~ } IT'trr♦ u:.
} R M Y l P V'.'. C! Olt }.L* t 1 r` J J T l y Y Y A' r
n-
1 i~ 54 { .5' y# f ,r 5~~s. +H Ilr'~"ry jI U f "f i T _ 7. ~iv 1# t
r
s~ 5e (y ~ a~; ~i1y,~ 1'S t~.~r~,~ ~ aty .fir ~lii (ty,~i ~~ti~"t n~1 Ll f:(~9~~1. 1RUN;
6 T'1 3 3 4: r i. r t y K r ~ t M 1
1 K~ f 1 ~ r1,. W 1 i t
v ~tj~'I l 1,FF la~9GtY ~
r F W rYS r~' i 1
,r rtilY~}~eh~itj 7 E.1 r ° ~t ~G } J R' ~:e pIt,' R ~l a w z: 'b Mr
d ink
1 r w, 4 r r S try {t 1~r 41.. Ay r lt4 ~F. a.
41,
CF : ~~I I F t f r \ 1'.. f . 71l ^ w `Y a 1 1k:1 ~i 9 rv~
s i'
t r 1 C t t e Nr v d F 7 x r#a ! ~d
rt, r 'C r Z KO ' n t h-i f'
,y i %`M
r y. t r F i v S a 1 J a< 1 i< f} i`` r~, 4- 9^ > !.,-f
- t ^ r r.`. `IP t
X Y rp yA~ yyr r y l `
P F ri 1 1 r4 C r j t 4 1! i 5y k H w ~t+r t J 11~ L2
a rS \ `1^tk~dt +~`5
r f ^ fY. In 't d A A ly X Tr r r1~r (!~1^ft '6 't
-0 WAIN 01%
°~~(Qqt p k• 'A 1 r^ ~I r tlf v~~ ~S, f 1r~jM,; F~j.,p7 } tF~r L k w'~ Ca \ t t r# ^ ` .prR" y}(:'.
f~y'(F1 1 F Y yPF ,.ryo t 5 W
rmr.l .jlf¢~j'+jY*.'{"`f4 P9Y~ir`ft j~fAY~.''4~ ~+}0''lf^r `Clry9 v}i p~~r~+ Y"
IA I
,,~.T! i'. `y . yFtd rr y, X X 1v r'v'r rri1 I^ 4 rrIII
a'4 * w yd j{} 0 ~i'.
t p94 ~III~S 1,(Fx l4 - 1 t1 41"1 WIN
w
1-; 6X ~1 t d ~4rrt~p.
t? J x,~\ u ; t•Hy' Ph~rIf~I~i 4rti1 1ry~ r{511
- 1 a j
its
.l J.
vat 1 4 ' Y b r 1At,x 1 >'7 a 74. s nl r•t a .9 }l, IT
s s'..1 ,;t v 1
f R: R6 Fyr ~2 y F l? ld,h"{) h fj+l ri 14VYR
p ~S
?Y ,V P 1tYV '°T-i- c +1 k r. F~ J' F L ~ e rrHt
.',x F~ ~ 1 f r v T i
•i't s~i ~ ILf c 5 i 7+t{ .1 1 ~S }j1
F r, !n~j ~b tk~ ti . nd Y~ a .4i a N 1 1~ 1 ~t r Y. c v
HM v ~°Y t Rr1~7
, rk 1 'd01~" t'{ vi r sr n r r v.
I~ I T
' Mta Ffli .T`i
"Y r PY s,+Ifi
! ° .~4 }Y!b e ' f r,r.,Ki 'r q y~ y ! 4a~r L^, A: r~~`i 1 r' 1 p'
\ a~F ~°a a "~¢}F ~ L r b "R .,<LF,} 1 - 1 7 t
't ) 11 1 r 1 t r a.
\ r i ~ 1 ✓Y S I C t
1 R f, .r Y t '
t
- i kN fq 2.~rr a d - -.f ~ 1 a'~ '~i' 'i
I ! I
I
E '
w I SF-7
j Zero lot line
Residential j
Rec
-1410 Grob lt• a l I T{ ~J % L/
I
I f rea /
I w~Meooe / I
Zero lot line
.Residential
SF-7
c P"
i I F-I F-
1
111 1
i
I
I
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1406
August 7, 1979
Identity: Z-1466
This is the petition of Dr. V. W. Redman requesting three changes in
zoning on a tract located on the north side of Dallas Drive beginning
north of the intersection of Dallas Drive and Hopkins Drive.
1) A change in zoning from Agricultural (A) to Multi Family (MF-1)
classification on 1.37 acres which begin near the northeast
corner of Dallas and Hopkins Drives. This tract has approximately
40' of Dallas Drive frontage and has a depth of approximately 4801.
2) A change in zoning from Agricultural (A) to General Retail (GR)
classification on 1.773 acres beginning approximately 40' north
of the Dallas/Hopkins Drive intersection. This tract has 190'
of Dallas Drive frontage and is approximately 550' deep.
3) A change in zoning from Light Industrial (LI) to General Retail
Datlaslassifica Drive on .623 intersection. which begins 230' north of the
RECOMMENDATION:
These zoning requests are located in an area of mixed land use and
j zoning. The property to the north and northwest is zoned Light Indus-
trial (LI). A restaurant and veterinary clinic are located at the
intersection of Dallas Drive and Willow Springs Road, and there are
light industrial uses located to the north on Willow Springs, The
property to the south and southeast is zoned Single Family (SF-10) and
is developed as the Hopkins Hill Subdivision. The tract immediately
to the east is undeveloped and zoned Agricultural (A),
The Comprehensive Plan indicates this property is appropriate for
development as offices. The petitioner proposes a transition of land
uses beginning with the downzoning request on the westernmost portion
of the proposal--item (3) above, This .6 acre tract would be rezoned
from Light Industrial to General Retail. In combination with this
parcel, 1.7 acres described in item (2) above v*uld alsr be zoned
General Retail (GR) from its current Agricultural (A) classification.
{ Finally, the petitioner seeks to develop that 1.3 acre tract described
` in (1) for apartments; thus, it is requested for Multi Family (MF-1)
~J zoning (see land use map).
i White the General Retail (GR) zoning request on the center parcel (2)
i is a somewhat more intensive land use than shown in the Comprehensive
Plan, the petitioner proposes a buffer of apartment development between
the retail area to the west and the residential and agricultural pro-
perties to the east. The proposal for apartment development in this
location 1s an %-•ropriate land use because it is compatible with
i
i
E
z f
existing and potential uses in this vicinity, and because apartment
use is less intensive than the office use proposed in the Comprehensive
Plan. Public facilities are adequate for this development.
The Planning and Community Development Department recommended this odd-
shaped tract could be better developed through the site plan review
procedure of Planned Development (PD) zoning, incorporating different
land uses than proposed here,and recommended denial of this petition.
Of 11 notices sent to property owners for the Planning Commission
hearing, two were returned in favor and none in opposition. No one
spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission hearing.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this a reasonable zoning
request and recommended the City Council approve zoning petition Z-1406.
The vote was 5-1.
f
i
i
f
I
h ,
j
I
~ f
i
1 , F r 1 `
AGRICUITURaL
J
GENERAL RETAIL
Z-1 r . y.M 414! ?.yt @#' ~y6~~ a?y~9y 4h
t it
r. r ty } ~
I {ry - ~ . f 'gar ~ j c ♦ t ~ ~ ~ ~ c~" Iw" ~
• 4
°,,.7~~• '.'7 t t R lye, ^f^I ` ` }/k~~ 5k, •~,'S R ga~4 A4j,{'(~~~•~ly. .'ti
.kk, JJ}} y•
TRIAL
} I+v-;yOP Y L'RETAIL . t ' 4 k4'~' 4 I f
4.11
~1 f s 5 : it y fl +f rl r ,F °t. a rAV, #
y t•~e a~u .r . M t 1 , f `4t ~ 'r r~' t , ~ 1M`' f.,
r,}' NOPK+VS
t Yj ~.1 ♦ pP ~ 4 ~ y[4 a j f'^^9Y4 4~7, ,i'a « k ~ N♦
41
M c
r l l r~ffj] 7n y~
1 " 7 y~ .,~I11i~hu7r~' `~i.y~p~ ~ f4*'1 il a""° P 9!~r! O~ .~fY.1~.
Yt' i ra { }q ti r°
'$'W + ~!''~•.r ins°k kr.. a fi" .4~ tiF "°f ° `•>'~i"'.~ II'lo
~ ~ : X'~ hI a~r "2, ~ 41. ' ` f. tire, ! i ~a~ ` G ~:~'`y ~ ~4 ~'~'Y ~ YF ~l
k 4 ♦ .i~'1'k ~h gi^1't. Y~ 1)i.~ ri.'° \1~~4; `tdf ttI,Y'~'•+~~1
N 'IL i,It ;Y F; PYS.i4•,' F ' ~~1. TF. 6; °~l'l 'k}~,y~,rUy"' +4F ~ti. ,iY4 'W4 r~~ Vii:
1`111 ,to J' 'RM !~~~at'"~1 tia_'~, t• ~l~il l f N~4 ?~;4r F6
j* 4 R 6 R V .P . 4i • _ ! ! 4 l t', "•f, T" r4 r : R
V ~y ~.r. 4 1 r i'
41 #
4r~1 ♦ . ~ h~~ fy . ~ 4 ti ~~f y J};yl J~, +~l ~ .fit y 4y~~°4 X. 4* ..dkk~ ~~'~11 ~`k :
! Y . { Y : t ~ ! I As ~ ~ . wt ~.t. r 4 ;rk ~R R FFF r' t .y.
.
' ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ' F . 4 ~ . v~ s'xc , . ~ ~ ~ e tit r rs ~ 1 e ;
I r It1e ~`a11~1 r.r. Y. i 'rp 1 ~ ~ ik, j`! '~!~'1♦~ ti4~t'~'.
,x
k a 4+~ , :.~:Y =G '~i°'".' 'F14, ,~M ! ~ ITS: I~•?,~~`~1~~,~.a,~ ~ >♦4' ~ +1. yt'+ ! 'Y ~4
. 14
1
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1405
August 70 1979
Identity: Z-1405
This is the petition of Mr. Bob Smith requesting a change in zoning
from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) classification on
approximately 18 acres located at the southwest intersection of
Mockingbird Lane and Audra. This planned development is proposed
for the development of detached, single family houses on lots ap-
proximately 66000 square feet in size.
Recommendation:
This property is located in an area that is predominately undeveloped.
There are several homes fronting Mockingbird and Audra Street in this
vicinity and the remainder of the areais vacant or used for agricultural
purposes. The petitioner wishes to build a subdivision comprising lots
approximately 6,000 square feet in size. Since the minimum single
family tone in Denton Is SF-7 -(7,000 square feet lots), he has made
this request for Planned Development zoning.
It Is the Planning Commission opinion that this is a reasonable request.
The lot size proposed does not differ significantly from the standard
SF-7 lot and if the property is developed under the requested planned
Development zone, there will not be a noticeable change in unit density.
Additionally, the Commission feels subdivision development should par-
ticularly be encouraged in East Denton, and the homes developed will
help meet part of the need for moderate cost single family housing.
Public facilities are somewhat inadequate. Mockingbird and Audra
Streets are currently only an oil and gravel construction, but will
adequately serve this development for the immediate future. As a
part of the subdivision development, the petitioner will construct
the streets adioininflg his property to city standards, The other
sections of Mockingbird and Audra will be paved as the other vacant
roperties develop. Water 4s available for extension to this site.
Sewer is currently unavailable, but it appears a federal grant may
soon be apprived which will give that tract sewer service.
The Planning and Community Development Department recommended approval
of this petition, Of 18 notices mailed to property owners for the
Planning Commission hearing, four were returned in favor and none in
opposition to this petition. No one spoke in opposition at the Planning
Commission hearing.
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended the City
Council approve zoning petition Z-1405 with the following conditions:
1. The proposal for detached, single family homes on lots total ling a
minimum 6,000 square feet 1n size shall observe minimum setbacks
required in the SF-7 zoning classification.
2. Plat approval shall constitute site plan approval for this single
family area.
E ~
w
rr: ~
t
r a §
t r
' y r r ~
t ti y;r
~ 1 a y 4 C
3 ~
,
f' ! t1}} r a r t •r i a
`y1~y$YA d 1 k` u iy
F, 1• t~i'i t ; •t rs a.^~I
rVat~+j • Z I6V~ n ) r~1s AUPRA a~~ 1
l.,~ _ n , t
1 9 f r i ~ J S~~
ffR
Cut
Fr ~S 1 ~ u)t ~ 9' IrF R~~~T,'~j y ~1~r rt fV~ ~ r
' p y • $ k Y J r~ tk I ; ~ ~ A d~, y'iC 4!><, 1 7 ~ ' r ~ ~ y
,
Y w t
t Y C k r 1 . n V' ' 5
iy s ~a.S ~y y i k l k d `i j d ~Y
J ~N1~ l•'T. ~1 ~J t r! s IJn w,R r. r 5 rr r, la' r i £ t i
! f ~v l ~ ! n r a ;~'r 1 ~
i y ly • y ^ M1 d J i,y K` f
u Jam
v~
k 7 7 i ~ tI 3~ J . ' ! J v 1) Y ~ `~1lrt + P
• v r, .t 1
y L vk v #
! v it >f X411 k 4;. 1.1 rJ { t i, yt lrta! AN; 1 To
1$_§wi t qF
re 3 7 M
'A r°,, on
vj + i ` rat,, St, ~l;,k dl~ t ~b~r~R ,~y~ %RRf i1 r","1 ts:
f s1 ~
'L
Iq u!! ~ fw, % w R 4~ S' ~ r. ! ~ ~~r F~'I',s " 7 `w 1• C W-4'
Y'•
1 '
rI .
4 1 ~u, j t l~ W y, d 4 t .~y !
f Trily y ttr # It`hE4 ~rv yi1, i •'1 ♦ i t'.y a!1 x+4dTJ• , e t~~ r u t
arr.,. ` y` vl , } ' • r F 5 n ;i~ 1 . ! r A J
• 5 i I R y4 . .1, i
L + 4 t rd 7 1 J ~Y{ ! F' i Ir_ i
k i ki 1r y~r~t Q ` , 1~ d ` 1 YI ff f ♦ , r! i t l ! • 1
•I; Sy! i 4 yR i A t 1 f t~ .rAlt• F 1 1~..: 4' , 1 4 1 • t 1 • 4
a ~ l ~4. d MAW ~ r k r~ ~ i eh 4n4 ! ~ f ~ «y~P !'..t ~ ~ • er
! A r 1 ) '.r~, y r',p ' Y~~ ~pf ~tY, 1 ~.tA"C•J r '~J s, a .~d'
1 ~ ! a~,' 1 f r 4`}T i , s~!~ ~~1C ~g` ~ ~ 1^• ~t~ ~ ~t ~ ~~S
14 7
y • a S " z a X 7• ~k,
1 f~nti Y" yy ~Fr q„1 6'k{ y~
1}a4'Ptp J• + A a y., 1 , ,a..';
t
i
f:
F-
0
b
a
1 777 Y.~ „ J .
05
,j-
n
~ y t
r' i"t~,,
10 'SfY4 t t f ~ a 7
r r 1 ~'v ff r ~ r ~ '
1 ~ y t~ ~i ~ { ~ 11 rr
t;°~ r d~ f J a r r t a i ~,,tt,,•~ { t .r`rt x t
y t r' i~ h. S~ '1 p t t k} .~•'r F' ' 1
p ~rlt f "r t tf~ r' f 1h ~y' •~°e.w
f J y~ a I'' ( il.rM;1 h fit' t ~ 3 f*'^' ~a
a4
t R N ! ~ ~ 1 ' t~` '
,i~ d 3 i f1r a!~ 1Y
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1408
August 7, 1979
Identity; Z-1408
This mpetition
requeIstindung that an approxi-
(LI). This
tract is located on the north side of Highway 77, between Bonnie Brae
and Riney Road.
Report and Planning Commission Recommendation:
This t is TheretIsca drive-in theater locatedaonithersouthnsidey of undeveloped.
a
the cross from this property, and there are several homes located near
rounding
roundinghthis property fishtypically in eagreainder ricultural of
or h very area sur-
single family use.
The property itself is bisected by the proposed corridor for loop 288
(see attached map), The property owner had requested that the Loop
corridor be shifted to the north side of the property, but he has
withdrawn that request and agreed to the State approved location.
There are also two major easements for electrical service on the
property.
The question of whether public facilities are adequate depends largely
I on how the property is developed. Water service is relatively close
and can be extended to the property and there is adequate capacity in
the line. Sewer service would probably need to be extended from the
area around North University Place. There is adequate capacity in
this line for a plant employing 3,OC.. persons, assuming no industrial
waste. There are no unusual drainage problems apparent on the property.
This tract has street access to Highway 77 and Bonnie Brae Street and,
of course, will eventually have street access to Loop 288. Highway 77
connects to I-35 and loads into the city by Elm Street, The property
also has direct access to Bonnie Brae which leads to Windsor and
I University Drive,
The Public Works Director hat reviewed access and traffic potential
of the site. It is assumed (there is no verification) that Texas
i Instruments will build an assembly plant on the property. He is also
assuming a work force of 3,000. If these assumptions are correct,
the Public Works Director believes that there will be significant
traffic congestion in the vicinity of this site, at least until such
t
need ime as the Loop is completed. There will almost certainly be a
BonnieoBraetraTheresignal will, of Intersection of
i
2.
traffic on Highway 77 and Bonnie Brae. Highway 77 is adequately paved •
and is maintained by the State. The paving of Bonnie Brae is sub-
standard, and it is uncertain how long it would last under increased
traffic volume. It is likely that Bonnie Brae pavement would have
to be improved within a short period, particularly near the intersection,
on the land use issue, this proposal is at variance with the Comppre-
hensive Plan. The property is proposed for Light Industrial (LI1
zoning. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the area, both north
and south of Highway 77, should be developed for residential use.
The Planning Commission feels it is questionable whether the area
immediately adjoining the Loop will actually be developed for single
family use, but the proposal here is for a 245 acre tract which involves
much more than the Loop frontage.
The Planning Commission considered three options. The first option is
to maintain the land use plan as indicated in the Comprehensive Plan,
A second option is to approve the Light Industrial (LI) zoning as re-
quested and, in effect, modify the Comprehensive Plan. It is reasonable
to expect additional proposals for industrial and commercial uses in
this area along the Loop if this precedent is established, and those
requests would have to be considered in the same light as this request.
A third alternative is to place additional development controls on the
property, such as through approval of Planned Development (PD) zoning
for light industrial use.
The Plannin Commission is recommending that the request for Light
Industrial ) zoning be approved as submitted. The Commission felt
that, if this site is developed with the typical campus type assembly
plant that TI has built elsewhere, it is reasonable to exppect that the
nearby area will still be suitable for residential use. A local
example of a light industrial plant, on a much smaller scale, built
near a resident a1 area is the Jostens plant on 1-35. The Commission
felt that the possible problems involving traffic and street maintenance
could be overcome by the city with sufficient notice and through coopera-
tion by the petitioner An important consideration in the Commissioner's
decision was the benefits the city would realize involving additional
jobs and tax revenue through the development of a TI plant. The staff
recormendation was that the petition be modified from Light Industrial
(LI) to Planned Development (PD) for light industrial use.
A final issue that was discussed Involves whether to recommend the
Light Industrial (LI) classification for this site on the property the
I State has indicated will be the Loop 288 right-of-way. In one other
instance, a zoning request over the proposed Loop right-of-way itself
was denied. The reason for this is to discourage any development over
the Loop corridor, as fixed by the state and the Comprehensive Plan,
so that when the right-of-way is purchased, the public, will not have
to purchase and remove buildings. This could cause serious delays in
the development of the Loop. A secondary consideration is that light
industrial zoning may affect the appraisal of the property and the
cost of acquisition. Representatives of the petitioner stated at the
a
i
3
Planning Commission hearing that they had no intention of developing
over the Loop corridor, and the Commission did recommend that Light
Industrial zoning be applied to the entire property as requested.
The staff would urge very serious consideration of this issue. At
least the potential exists that zoning the right-of-way could result
in delay and increased cost of the Loop development. If the right-
of-way itself were zoned Agricultural (A) then, in effect, potential
problems would be avoided. The staff can foresee no way that this
step would~;e any affect on the development of the tract for a
light industrial plant as proposed.
i
i
I
i
I
i
i
i
f
l~
~ i
Z-1408 I f
l ~
I rrl x a t 11 Y
III '
IL ~ ~f wrr , i
flow
1 J 1 iwo
I
Oki
'ti 1M • 2000, i
IT" .._:L• L
1 yM. !
r;. L' tir 6,
' I
~ I
1 '
41 H,W M.
t1.t Mollie. 41•~o MN
{1 'J{ OJ 411{~ {I
.
%Ilri fLRVfY
,',~lR~ Lr
faE $uRv!•J' 'NI '
A-Hap
- e! I 1 71 X824, 9/ 0. jr r \
Jr
14.826! ACRES \
i ~
J.$. COW
fewrr
A 107
E
i . ~ wrryrN{~w.
r x ,
1
rw~v 1 wrnr-
$1 trifle 1W
{
Ma'
Planning and Toning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
S-133
August 7, 1979
Identity: S-133 +
This is the request of Ms. Kaye Conaway for an amendment to a specific
use permit which authori-es the operation of a day nursery at 707
Carroll Boulevard. In iJ76 a specific use permit for a day nursery
was granted with the following conditions:
A) The permit be issued to Ms. Kaye Conaway and be non-transferable.
B) The number of children cared for meet the standard set forth by ,
the Department of Public Welfare, this being a maximum of 34
children.
C) Parking shall be based on one space for every two employees.
D) All public access to the day nursery shall be from Coit Street.
Ms. Conaway is requesting an amendment to the condition which allows
a maximum 34 children. She wishes to expand the day nursery to serve
l 50 children.
Recommendation:
The Zoning Ordinance permits property owners to seek specific use per-
mit approval for day care facilities in areas for residential use.
The philosophy that underlies this provision is that in particular
areas, and under certain conditions and limitations, a day nursery
can operate without damaging surrounding residential properties. It i
is the Planning Commission feeling that this day nursery use has not
been a nuisance to the neighborhood nor has it damaged the residential
environment. The proposed increase of 16 children, from 34 to 60,
appears reasonable, and the Planning Commission can foresee no negative
impacts resulting from it.
The Planning and Community Development Department expressed reservations
{ regarding the possible increase in noise and traffic resulting from
this change. Of 30 notices sent to property owners for the Planning
Commission hearing, four were returned in favor and none in opposition.
No one spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission hearing.
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended the city
Council approve an amendment to specific use permit, S-133, which would
authorize a maximum of 50 children in the nursery facility at 707 Carroll
Boulevard.
i
i
i
t +t.r a
ALI
r A't „e 1
tl.~
` n • is ~ 1' ! Ik
IS I .
,r
L
~,r I
.f
R j r 1 I~ JJ
q • l a
1 1 `
taw
.1
I }
rip ,t (j~~
~ f 1' • h i
t r a ~ 1
~.i la
r 1
i
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1407
August 7, 1979
Identity: Z-1407
This is the petition of Ms. Linda Lavender requesting a change in
zoning from Multi Family (MF-1) to Single Family (SF-7) classification. i
Location:
The site in this request is located at 609 Nest Oak Street.
Recommendation:
This request continues the trend of property owners along Nest Oak
Street requesting downzoning from Multi Family (MF-1) to Single Family
(SF-7) classification for their single family homes. Last year the
Planning Commission recommended and the City Council approved a
similar rezoning request on 19 residential properties. In February,
three additional requests were submitted and approved. Sentiment
for this action by surrounding property owners is positive and the
Planning and Zoning Commission strongly supports this move as a
meaningful step in recognizing the significance of the Oak Street area.
The requested single family classification reflects the current use
and, it is felt, the best land use for this tract. The Commission
can foresee no negative impact to surrounding property owners if this
request is approved and, therefore, recommends approval of this peti-
tion.
I
The Planning and Community Development Department recommended approval
of this request. Of 23 notices sent to property owners for the
Planning Commission hearing, one was returned in favor and one in
Planning opposition to th i s petit ion. No one spoke in opposition at the
P
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended the City
Council approve zoning petition Z-1407.
i
I
t
' trr~ ~ fit' f r, rt, + . ~ •F
.1 1 C " F'y31
* • yam, 1 d I ` r1. ly r.. w4r~.
* `4 r ti. fJie'
0 (y
r
~s1rrj,~Ef~I~,k~.;
14` 7
y
i
- 'f
k- Li
1~ ~ ~ ~ , ° t ~ L ~ ~ \ S " p r~• may'
W., HIC RY } ff
e !
■r
Y i
W. C ! m J er
I
R
t IF M _ f AI
y R~yF 1 # . e~jl
# r
I
I
I
I
I
C 1
I
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1409
August 7, 1979
Identity: Z-1409
This is the petttion of the Municipal Police Department requesting a
change in zoning from Multi Family (MF-1) to Light Industrial (LI)
classification on a 2.5 acre tract for use as an animal shelter.
Location:
The site in this request is located on the west side of Woodrow Lane,
.3 mile south of East McKinney.
Recommendation:
The tract in this request is located on the west side of Woodrow Lane
in an area zoned for Multi Family (MF-1) use. The area on the east
side of Woodrow is zoned Light Industrial (Li) and Planned Development
(PD) for light industrial use, and there are several small industrial
uses existing there. With this predominance of existing industrial
land uses and zoning, it is questionable whether apartment zoning is
appropriate for the site in this request, as well as for that general
area zoned MF-1 west of Woodrow. The Comprehensive Plan gives us no
guidance in this case. it is the Planning Commission,foeling that
industrial zoning in this general vicinity is reasonable and an ap-
propriate land use on both frontages of Woodrow Lane.
f The tract is being proposed by the City Police Department for an
animal shelter. Frbm a public facility perspective--water, sewer,
r and streets--this site is adequate to accomodate the proposed devel-
opment. Ths site is also quite adequate from a public service
perspective given its location.
The Planning and Community Development Department report expressed
mixed feelings about this zoning petition. Of four notices mailed
to property owners in this request, one was returned in favor and
none in opposition. No opposition was expressed at the planning
Commission hearing.
{ The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Council approve
zoning petition Z-1409. The vote was 5-1.
J
i
AM, pa
v «s.f re ;fAil,~ r 7,F, t "a v+ Y~.l.~'f lY(~,~^.~.rF fir' I I j r r~' I
a Y ` '4 it ~ S J x,`:7 ^ i 1 ~ r, •'r 4 W frr r'~[A ' r M r~' } C r.'~r .l .'J S 1
/ r. r Y ~rxd ~ k" w; r ~ 1 w 9 w ; 4 ~ °<Q . r s b o o w d~ ~ 1
yam,Y7nr
f a i r e r~ f,! k I. 1 Y/ r S Y r f r t s X ' w/
' i , ~ 1 r r r. ~ Ftr'F J P eti "LEA i- ~ N lye V~4L ti ~e "N d ~
~ r ay . , ~4y sa~n•'". r if•: ~ r 7r' ~ "l e : Y ~ ~^w I
t f~r~ fv , d~v r a tie i t 0.. ~1~ r e ,4. w ~5 F e l :IVir'~ r~ ~r l~ 1 'a~~ lr ~ e i P i a".
" r A t
~ ~ i n r i~dY -4 4~Ytc 7 .,e, ~ ♦ b ,rv! i ~"~r,f 1r i n 11 r A!'i /
S et ,`r kr1 r, y, ~y, cy~ A'. 7~yt ervU~'3 ` ~ e ~ f. x ear !j a~r i'[°' k k A ~ ,'.F k' y+~P~~~ p S i ~3r
a , ~t ~ r r J 1 4 ~ bssS~ r
R Y ,F! "S~~A A~ " t r w ~ I I Y "e~', ~ ff
x ! r "7 enl~^ r xj' ~ r , yt~' t~ r ~j - e ~ r ~ ~
x r 31'+~ i E} ~,~.F fl 0.i ~r A v 1 I r 'i. }a
"i r ~ l ~ YI '.F,JI]J 7h r r; {d 1 r d ~ ~~t~> t ~p~, J r m,l,~1
a 'Y ~t p
y fi.:^~r'~,r r.. rr~'~k'111~~~0.1~ Vy , ~yq~;.~7r f',} 5 ,,,♦[.yly~.~, uv ;kr'',.y ~i.e~e'~1<~ ~ i"~,f`ti 1
+e y v S1
'7tii`t F k+Y:5 t p !l v 1 Y e e k p r -T91t l
a'Ke q P,y,rr • inppe«. 'G S,~ ri
J`j l tk. •tl+nN H~tXwny , ~ e r tf '~,rt y 1rFl.: w as v-1 ~ r r
K c r{e r{ r t i f eta i y ~f I 1 ~N ^ ib v r z ,~F* " J! ySF' Mr Mkv
YJ I' r vwa iX.qx R n y + i 'F u + i , rL 1 ~yr`ti 1 J r f y'
fe)~ i r- 7 4Aa'f4-c 1 Drew. ! 3i. fw ai Xf rrF" ( r r 16¢i rr l S it'
~'yT74P~
+ j$ N' y L,Ji J~'"' ^1 t 0 _y# S"1 t~ 1.M:rj•' p " r ' • ,ty~ S I r 1•'., .M'~ ? r 7 e I
~~i~~~
} r}e yw 3r r , wA d y f lYn"Y~ 1C Y
i^,iY Yf « a 1#"^, r 3~~a r < t iS W4,01dMt41
f~,.
,~.}4`~ .f iv 7`y~N1MM 'k r yi !y, e d d., t ~r y E Y .}"f< a x `~1 V 116y 'i r~ , n a
Y e ~ ~ ~ ~YF ~~F ~e51~i F ~~y~""h' y { k r~ ~ n f q}.i a fl r t r + .ij d 'a A
i~ r gip, oo 'r+
r r r r I y".ii3L4 rc e~1
i td~~ M! '~~'y , ya ~FSf. air ' r ;dyS fr. , 1}~, E r °rti•t py'J ;'Y.
p p J r ~ ,y S J ,YY~
e + .rt y# xrs r ~S ti ~ v al lr5~`~,~ t ~ k. it `~TSY yf , i S+ rY ,
to.f. 1Qefh, ♦ J t' l S t 1
6{*g 'Y'~ I h0~v t;5 y GI y r'#y~r .rF a x M 1 y y cen 1 h~,FI'a,nt
T ~X ty,~.~~Jle ~x.~~x , i n ~ 6j#i fi.,r r , Jr r't M Aa .ly r`
t
2 i# 1r
y~~ "~7 J~ r ,Ydke ! Y Irk 'rr1"► ~k,5, r, e~tT'C. H S i. a,~ ,y '../i,
`Jp a X ~ i r K ~ i' n I F ~6 ~ w
y~{{i
r'frr~p C r' Sg"1 tay•r~
0
'1 IRY,
f>~1 r. ~~1 4 r, y`~ ~ ~a~ 3 ~ 31 ~nr' 3 ~'~i.• l r.r ~1 ry+h~, r Yi`4 ~ {~T~ y 4 i 4yktr ~Py°i tr a ~a r y,.. j ~ e ) r.
i'•4 jj ,t .T F ♦ f icy
bti.f CIJ. ~~,."'r E~ 1 L ij'r~ 7 sT4~, c~ti ~•r~ ~ eh ~ ~ f " ~'s". f„
,k 1fy ~,°4$' 'y r,9 s{y, t, ' 6 ~".c. t .r:} 4✓71Y.,'+`. f ♦ 'i i Uy,~. 5s1~,~JNa
e 6 ;'~c! ~n J7 fr S I .>fc` < v. , W' 'C L`_ if .r Rat , 1 t,
a ~A * 43 i r it yfk'L i
SA % WA
r i. eft r aJ S r ~ r ~ e1 r % t ~ ' 'd er f w y r5 IL
1f ^ yl, x}w. a1 'P 1. r r r ~4 R,'S y i } .i~,., ~yd r 'y^' nl ?r9,a 1 4_
}r1 l , S „t
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: City of Denton City Council
'f FROM; Der;on Municipal Airport Advisory Board
DATE: July 23, 1979
SUBJECT; Airport Board Recommendations for Management
of Denton Municipal Airport
I
The Airport Advisory Board respectfully offers the following
recommendations concerning a management plan for the Denton
Municipal Airport:
I. PhIloso The City's budgetary constraints perhaps will
c a e t e scope of management the City can afford. Full.
time management is, of course, most desirable, whether that
management be group contract or individual.
f measure, however, we believe that the City should nseek eaim
dutiesidemandpfull-timeemanagement and until revenues time that
I
On the question of group management, we suggest that the
City Manager and the Airport Board look closely at the
p
roposal before any decision is made. In any case, the
Airport
with theBAirport Bronly oard ongthetfinaltoneManager
or gtwo to consult
2• Qualif______ications, The Candidate should
I I A. have formal training or practical experience in
f airport management,
I B. have formal training or practical experience in
I dealing with City government, and in dealing with
other appropriate State and Federal agencies.
3• Duties. The Candidate shall
A. be appointed by the City Manager after receiving the
recommendations of the Airport Board,
I
3, advise the Airport Board and report directly to the
City Manager on all matters relevant to the use and
operation of the Denton Municipal Airport, its lands,
and facilities.
I
i
I
I
Chris Hartung
July 23, 1979
Page Two 1
C. negotiate leases on all property witnin the confines
of the Denton Municipal Airport, subject to approval
of the City Council.
D. collect and deposit all fees from leasing, services,
and operation of the airport, its lands, and facilities. '
E. promote and seek out business expansion of the airport.
F. study and recommend to the Airport Board the best uses
of properties of the airport. I
G. be responsible for seeing that all rules governing the
operation and use of the airport are followed.
H. be responsible for setting up and enforcing safety and j
security procedures for the airport. i
1, be responsible for maintenance of all airport properties.
J. be responsible for seeing that all lessees follow the
terms of their leases.
K. not be in conflict of interest by being involved in j
I or with any business, service, promotion or purchase 9
f or sale of land within the vicinity of the airport
where he may obtain personal monetary gains. Any
questions in this area should he discussed openly
with the Airport Board and printed in the minutes.
L. be responsible for seeking and recommending Federal
and State airport grants.
M. recommend to the Airport Advisory Board changes in I
operational guidelines and fee schedules.
i
N. regularly attend Airport Board meetings.
4. Extent of Search. If the position is to be part-time, the
search ssho d probably be restricted to the Denton-Metroplex
f area. We should, however, look as far as necessary to find
J the best candidate.
J 5. Budget. The Airport Board has recommended the following as
a supplement to the 1979-80 Annual Budget (see "Airport
Department:, p. 7): i
i
I
Chris Hartung
July 23, 1979
Page Three
Supervisory Pay $12,000
Books b Magazines 100 f
Other 500
Office Machines 200
Telephone 500 j
Travel Expense 400
Furniture S Fixtures 11500
Office Machines 10000
TOTAL REQUEST $16,200
We recommend that while the Airport Manager's office should
be located in the Airport Terminal Building and that he should
have a telephone in his office, support personnel should be
shared with other departments downtown. The Airport Manager's
telephone should be installed so that it rings both in the
Airport Manager's office and in a City office downtown.
6. Im lementation. The Airport Board recommends that we find
!he r g t n vidual or group, work out an agreement, and
begin new management procedures as soon as possible, but no
later than January 1, 1980.
We further recommend that the City take steps to recapture
the Terminal Building in time for the new Airport Manager
to occupy it. We suggest that the City choose to recapture
the Terminal Building, apron, and surrounding area as
stipulated in the revised (19750) contract with Aerosmith.
If such recapture is impossible for whatever reason, we
recommend that the City recapture as much area around the
Terminal Building as possible.
j
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECTS Receive and Consider Request from Jess Coffey Regarding Water
and Sewer Service on North Sherman Drive
SUMMARYs /
i
Mr. Coffey has requested water and sewer service for his property
located between North Sherman Drive and North Stuart Road. This
property is not incorporated into the City of Denton. However,
this area has been certified to the City of Denton by the Public
Utility Commission.
He has expressed that he will meet all water and Sewer Utility ex-
tension ordinances and regulations which essentially are that the
developer shall install all water and sewer lines in this development
and extend offsite water and sewer lines to the nearest available
point.
FISCAL SUMMARYs
Normal annual water and sewer line maintenance and aervice costs.
Fire Hydrant maintenancca costs.
1 No participation costs anticipated.
ACTION REQUIREDi
Approval or disapproval of request for service.
ALTERNATIVES
Approval
It has been a policy of past councils to deny Water and Sewer service
to unincorporated areas except in unusual circumstantes, and ap-
proval would be a reversal of this past policy.
Disapproval
This may be in violation of Public Utility Commission regulation which
state that a Utility is obligated to provide service to a customer
providing the customer meets all extension policies.
RECOMMENDATIONi
The Public Utility Board at their meeting on 8/1/79 approved Mr.
Coffey's request by a vote of 3 ayes, two abstentions.
R. E. Nelson, P.L.
Director of Utilities
.
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING, August 7, 1979
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA),
Consider an amendment to the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance in order to
adopt the new Federal Insurance Rate Map and new flood boundary and floodway
maps.
SUMARY: In January of 1978, the Council passed a Flood Damage Prevention Ordi-
nance. This ordinance was patterned after a recommendation made by the Federal
Insurance Administration. As part of that ordinance, the Council adapted the
latest flood plain maps at that time. About two weeks ago, the City received the
latest updated maps from the FIA. These maps are the latest up to date maps and
the best engineering data that we have. Since this is the best data that we have,
the maps should be adopted to meet the intent of the ordinance.
FISCAL SUKWY: .
The current program is administered by the Engineering Department. Adoption of the
new program would not require any new personnel. The larg4st fiscal impact will be
borne either by developers who fill land that is in some flood zones, or by home
buyers who would be required to buy flood Insurance by the financial institution
that is making the loan.
ACTION REQUIRED,
The Council should adopt the amendment to the flood Damage Prevention Ordinance.
'ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives are not to pass the Ordinance. This would result in the City
having to get out of the FIA program and it would have serious afftects on all
financial institutions in the City, depending on the economic growth that we
expect in the near future.
STAFF RECOHIdENDATIONS,
The Staff would recommend approval of the amendment Except for very minor changes,!
this map is essentially the same map that has been in effect for the last year and
b half.
EXHIBITS- I - Memo
i
i
i4!^
WTV of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 382-9601
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE; July 179 1979
RE: Final Flood Plain Maps and Flood Insurance Rate Maps
Yesterday we received the final printing of the FIA's study for the City
of Denton. The information we received included the actual study, flood-
way maps and flood insurance rate maps. The department of HUD has advised
us that these new maps.,wiil go into effect August 1 of this year. We have
enough copies for the Council, if you would like more copies for the boards
and city officials they can be obtained. These new maps are also available
M to the public free of charge. They can be obtained by calling this toll
free number, 1-800-638-6620.
E Since the City has already passed a Flood Plain Ordinance, no new ordinances
or resolutions are necessary. This new map will serve as the principal doc-
ument for our Flood Plain management program. It will be changed or amended
as new developments and structures occur in our drainage system.
1
i
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DE.NTON, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 10 +
1/2, ENTITLED "FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION-, ARTICLE III, SECTION
10 1/2-51 PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY OROAtNS:
SECTION I. ,
That the Cade of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is
' hereby amended by amending Chapter 10 1/2, Article III, Section J
j 10 1/2-3 to read as follows:
"Section 10 1/2-3
The areas of special flood hazard identified by the
Federal Insurance Administration on its Flood Insur-
once Rate Map (FIRM) and Its Flood Boundary and
Floodway Map. Community No. 49-0I94, dated August 1,
1979, and any,ravlslons thereto are hereby adopted by
reference and declared to be a put of this Chapter.*
SECTION It.
That If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence,
I
1 clause, phrase, or word in this ordinance, or application
thereof to any person jr circumstances Is held Invalid by any
1 court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect
j the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and
the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares
it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such
i invalidity.
I '
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14)
days after the data of its passage and approval and the City
Sectstary Is hereby directed to cause the caption of this
ordinance :o to -,ut:!she: twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle,
i
the offic!31 nswspaoer of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten
(10) days of tie date of Its passage.
PASSED .At4D APPROVED this the 7th day of August, A. D. 1979.
I
CITY OF HJNTON,'TEXAS I
ATTEST: i
t
8004S N L , SECRETARY
CITY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
t
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
9U a. LOM NS, ACTING CITY
.
i
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS AOOPTCD AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 59-1,
AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 3.108 ACRES OF LAND AS i
SHOWN THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED' THEREIN; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: 1
That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordirances of the City of Denton, Texas, under provisions of
Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended as follows:
All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed from the
Single Family "SF-7" District as shown on said Zoning Mao, and
all provisions of Ordinance No. 69-1, adopted the 14th day of
January, 1969, as amended, shall hereafter apply to said property
as multi-Family Restricted IMF-R" District in the same manner as
other property located in the Multi-Family Restricted "MF-R"
District;
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land tying and being
situated in the N. M. Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract No. 811 City
and County of Denton, Texas, being part of a certain (called)
4.33 acre tract of land described in a deed from A. E. Mackey, et
ux to Albert W. Adkisson, December 19, 1955 recorded in Volume
418, Page 275, Deed Records and part of a• certain first tract
i described in a deed from C. N. Adkisson, Se., et ux, to Albert W.
E Adkisson November 27, 1946 recorded in Volume 418, Page 158, Deed
Records of Denton County,' Texas and bell:g more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the northwest corner of a tract of land described in
a deed from Nettie Shutt:, T. W. King, •Jr., R. J. Sammuel,
Trustees•of Bell Avenue Memorial Church to the City of Denton;
THENCE south 0 degrees 58 minutes 07 seconds east with a west
boundary line of said city tract, 201.01 feet to an inner ell
corner of a 3.707 acre tract described in a deed from Albert W.
Adkisson to Y. L. McCart, et al. Trustees of the First Southern
Methodist Church of Denton, Texas;
i
THENCE north 88 degrees 25 minutes 59 seconds west 406.61 feet to
a steel pin at the northwest corner of said 3.707 acre tract;
THENCE south i degree 34 minutes 01 seconds west 'with west
boundary line of said tract, 115.49 feet to a corner;
THENCE north 87 degrees 22 minutes 39 seconds Kest, 176.40 feet
to a concrete monument on the east boundary line of a 20 foot
wide utility easement;
THENCE north 1 degree 49 minutes 30 seconds west with east line
of said easement 310.76 feet to a steel pin on north boundary
line of said 4.33 acre tract;
THENCE south 88 degrees 19 minutes 46 seconds east 572.69 feet to
the place of beginning and containing in all 3.108 acres of land,
` more or less.
I ,
SECTION H.
findshthatthSuchichangenislinoaccohrdanice with D a of Denton. Texas hereby
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriato_ uses of land for the maxim uru benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of August, A. D. 1979.
BILL NASH MAYOR
CITY OF TEXAS
ATTEST:
BROOKS
HOLTO CITY-
TT
E CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
f
BURY R. 5-0070"-O-A-CMd CITY
ATTORNEY, CITY Of OENTON, TEXAS
i
r i
1 1 ^tr
,
. 1~
i
i
I
by the City Council of the City of
D-ntcn, Texas, relating to the North Texas
g r Education Authority Inc; approving
certain actions taken h `4~r`•'
Directors of the Corpora . tion;Baard of
the Directors thereof PProving
effective date. Providing an
i*tEkEA3, the governing body of , Texas
on the 5th day of July, 1978 the City of Denton
, requested that certain individuaj9
proceeded to re-organize and re-establish a non-profit corporation
pursuant to the Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act, for the
purpose of furtHering educational o ;
by providing fu,ds for the acquieitianrofnstudent£is udents.: oan, such has been acc=.P fished, the corporation being known as. }y
"North Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc."; and the
WYEREAS, the North Texas Higher Education Authority, nc ry
has proceeded in the de
and it is now a velopment of a Plan of doing busess ate the actions takenrandithe cforOmPthis Boardtofanirectors
of the said Corporation; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS: '
j
SECTION I - This
North exas gher Educatiuon Authority,hxncbethardsuchdCorpora-
tion, upon approval thereof by the governing bodies of the Cities
of Denton and Arlington, Texas, proposes to issue revenue bonds
in order to obtain funds to purchase student loan notes which are
guaranteed under the provisions of the Higher Education Act of
1965 (Public Law 89-329), as amended as
of the Texas Education Code provided by Chapter 53
issued as "Series A b ands in thetaggsre bonds would be initially
$20,000,000 and that such bonds wouldrbeate principal amount of
secured by a pledge of revenues derived fxomaor byrreason of the
ownership of student loan notes and investment income after
deduction of such expenses for operating the loan program as may
be specified by the bond resolution or trust indenture authorizing
or securing such bonds and the payment thereof.
•:c~T-CN 22. ~ This
tdo~t:SZ:7 governing body hereby requests that the
Authority,
issuen a -:d delivery of such bonds £ the'' proceed with the
and cnnection requests that the said Corsorationeexerciss
the 7: r ,;;;;,.rated and provided in p
Section 53.47 of the
Texas _ Code; that such non-profit corporation shall,
in th:,; :erection, exercise such powers for and on behalf of
the _!;Q State of Texas
Of the e:;~s Zducation Code.
as contemplated by Section 53.47(e)
4
'3'rk.f
SECTION 3: That
to W the following instruments
it; Or 3Ct'l.Ong,
(a) the By-Laws of the Corporation, as ao~,te
Board of Directors; d by the
(b) the Articles of Amendment to the Art_cl
Incorporation of the Corporation; f es of
(c) the Plan of Doing Business of the Corporation, as
adopted by the Board of Directors;
(d) the 'election or designation of the eight Directors
of the Corporation; and
(e) the authorization of the Series A bonds of the said
Corporation in the principal amount of $20,000,000;
are hereby approved.
SECTION 4: That the City of Denton, Texas, agrees to ,i
accept cas tat may be conveyed to it by the Corporation when
such funds are not encumbered and all bonds of the Corporation
are paid and retired, but in no event does the City aree to
assume any responsibility in connection with the aministration
of this student loan program; it being understood this responsi-
bility is being assumed by the Corporation. over the instr~ts which'tauthorizenthedissuance of bonds
g body that
b the
Corporation will specifically state that the City oofEDenton, Texas!
Is not obligated to pay the principal of or interest on the bonds
proposed to be issued by the Corporation. Nothing in this
resolution shall be construed as an indication by the City of
anytobligaation of a thetsaidlCorporationvwhether the pafore of
hereafter incurred, and in this connection, attention is or 1
called to the Constitution of Texas wherein it is provided,
a that a City may incur no indebtedness without having made
provision for its payment, and the City of Denton hereby
specifically assets or refuses to set aside any present or future funds,
of the Corporarionr the payment of any indebtedness or obligation
SECTION 6.
after i"' s pass This resolution shall be effective from and
passage.
?ASSED AND APPROVED, this day of 6 ,
. 1979.
ATTEST: or, ty of enton, eras
cretar
y, ty o Denton,Texas
t
i
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE ?TM
DAY OF AUGUST, A. 0, 1919.
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, ':y Resolution duly passed on the 6th day of March,
1979, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, approved
certain actions taken by the Board of Directors of the North
Texas Higher Education Authority, [me. Including the authorl•
tation of the Series A bonds of said Corporation to the
principal amount of 120,000,000; and
i
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the North Texas Higher
Educatian Authority, Inc. has since retermined that the amount
i of bonds to be iss0ed should be $10,Ou0,000 and such amount will
if be sufficient to provide the funds that will be needed for at
least one yearj
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That the Resolution Passed by the City Council on the 6th
day of March, 1919, be and is hereby amended by changing
Sections 1 and I(@) of said Resolution to show approval of the
authoritation of the Series A bonds of the North Texas Higher
Education Authority, Inc., in the principal mount of
$10,000,000.
SECTION II.
That except as amended hereby, the Resolution passed br the
City Council on the 6th day of March, 1919, to approved and
ratified in all respects,
SECTION Ill.
i
this Resolution shall be effective from and after its passage
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1th day of August, A. 0. 1979.
BILL MASH
CITY Of OENTON, TEXAS
J] - ATTEST:
1
CITY OF DEN{'OY,TEaAS
j
APPROYEO AS TO L£6AL FORME
i z
fi'T
ATTORNEY, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
i
,
i
' I
{
MP4
1
~;,'3 ✓ 1 ~ ,♦11Y~ vry Tao a~~t~f I r 2'('~~ ~ n1 ~g•4'~}'k~~11 1
~ a
r.~{}~f.:'"•y`wt~li•: L' ~+f'~... 1.l ~a ,t. 4rpy~.rt~Y'~~:'~`}'~y'~yw ~<r
J
AiETNAAS , REGULAR IwEEvTITHENGNUNIOF CfTHEPALCITY COUNCIL OF THe CITY OF DENTON,
NEtO BUIIDINC OF SAID CITY ON THE 7TH
DAY OF AUGUST, A. 0. 1979.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas and Aerosmith Denton
Corporation are parties to an agency agreement dated December
8, 1965, whereby the City appointed Aerosmith as the true end
lawful Agent for the City of Denton$ end
WHEAEAS, by the terms of this agency agreement, the City of
Denton may, by a resolution of the Denton City Council, revoke
I
this agency agreement At any time without notice to Ae
Denton Corporation: roamlth
NOW, THEREFORE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXASO THATRE50CY£0 BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
The agency agreement dated December 8, 1965, ahd between
the parties thereto is hereby revoked and terminated according
to the terms of the $Aid agency agreement, and revocation and
termination to be effective it 12:00 midnight an the 51st day
of December, 1979.
! PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of August, A.D. 1979.
CITY OF DENTDN, TEXAS
I ATTESTS
A Y
CITY~ Q .:(OS
O
45 I
1
APPROVED AS a _g,AL FORM: '
I
ATTORNEY, CIITYLCF DENTON TEXAS
{
I
{
L
i
I
I
y`. J
I
TEXAS A REGULAR MEENG OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OENTON
, AHEL: THTIE MUNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE 11
DAY OF ,
1979.
N
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS. 1e90tiations have taken Place and agreements
reached ►cr
YS the settlementa of the lawsuit. sty1laedd
n, N:RPEA_,qL
. CITY OF OENTOV in the mount of j2,50000
WHEREAS, the City Council 0f the City of Denton after
careful eensioeration of the matter finds that the HARPER
lawsuit sh0uIJ to settled according to these negotiations and
I' agreements;
NOW, THEAEFOAE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT;
1, The City Nanagor Is hereby authorized and directed to
expend money from the General Funds in the amount of $2,300,00
for settlement of the MA-01-RA T AL YS. CITY OEN_ TGN lawsuit.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of August, A. 0„ 1919,
i
i
CITY OF DIATON, TEXAS
ATTEST.
CITY OF OW ON, TEXAS
%
;L
ATTMEI,
:F .-'004, TEXAS
?t
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
I
SUBJECT:
Consider acquisition of property located on Woodrow Lane for r'
an Animal Shelter. f
I ~
SUMMARY:
The City of Denton staff has been looking for a site for the i
animal shelter for almost a .near. We used two main criteria in trying
tG locate an appropriate site. First, we looked for a site that would
be easily located and reached by any citizen needing to visit the facility.
Secondly, we looked for a site that wouldn't have a substantial impact
on the property values of adjacent property owners.
We think the site located on Woodrow Lane fits these two criteria. I'
The only two contiguous property owners are the City of Denton, with
undeveloped park property to the south, and Mr. Hare who owns the large
undeveloped tract to the north. The property offered for sale at this
time is a portion of that large tract owned by Mr, Hare. The closest
residence, to my knowledge, is the Dreamland Apartment Complex, which
is located approximately 1,000 feet to the west. The closest single
family residence is also over 1,000 feet away near the corner of Woodrow
and McKinney, To the south of the site is a meat-packing plant and an
industrial park and to the east, across Woodrow is an industrially
zoned sign shop. I don't believe that this proposed site will have a
substantial impact on any of the properties mentioned above. It must
be remembered that this facility will be designed to the highest stan-
dards recommended by the United States Humane Society and will be main-
tained in a high state of sanitary condition. Under these circumstances
there will be no odor problem,
A
FISCAL SUMMARY:
i
proosed
TwentyTthousandl($ for the
Denton County so that we can build extra capacity into the shelter yto
assist those portions of Denton County that have no facilities. This
$20,000 is strictly for capital costs of the new facility. We will have
to negotiate with the County at a later date on charges for operational
and maintenance costs.
The proposed expenditures for the construction of the facilities
are:
$90000 Building Costs estimated by architect
7,500 Architect fees
15,000 Sewer extension
20000 Water and sewer taps
11 000 Land acquisition
$d Total estimated cost
sFir ~i
I
1
Council Agenda Item
Page Two ,
ACTION REQUIRED:
If the facility is approved for this site, the Council needs q
if
to take the following actions. ,
I. Pass a resolution authorizing the purchase of the site
located on Woodrow Lane.
2. Approve the preliminary site plan presented by the
architect and authorize hint to proceed with the plans
and specifications.
ALTERNATIVES:
A. Enlarge and enhance the existing site. I,
B. Begin another staff search for another site.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the site on Woodrow Lane
be approved and the architect be allowed to proceed on the plans
and specifications.
i
i
i
k
E
i
fSY.M6
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 7, 1919
AGENDA ITEM:
h
Consider acquisition of property on Woodrow Lane for an animal shelter.
I,I RECOMMENDATION: J
The Planning Commission is required by the Charter to make a recommendation
on acquisition of property for public facilities. The recommendation is
based on land use considerations and the Comprehensive Plan. However, the
Plan itself does not address the issue of an animal shelter.
The Commission discussed the land use issue and recommended approval of
this site. They felt the shelter would have a negative influence on the
development potential of the adjoining area west of Woodrow which is zoned
multi family. It was their feeling that it is probably that other requests
for industrial use would be made on the went side of Woodrow if an animal
shelter is built here.
On the other location, and their feels giwasothatuthenshelterehere would ahave p a inegligible
impact on any existing development and would seem to be a convenient loca-
tion for the public. The Planning Commission did qualify their recommendation
for approval by asking that the facility be designed to minimize potential
negative impacts and requested an opportunity to review the plans before
they are finalized.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST,
1419.
R E S O .L 0 T! 0 N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton finds it necessary to purchase a
certyidesca bed hetowa andlocated in the City of Denton, Texas, and more
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is of the
OInion OftthestPara rid cel oflfreal estate describedibelow;
and
WHEREAS, described City of Denton and owner of said parcel, Robert
Her ree t esca consideration of 111,000.00 is a fair and agreed
value of such NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
1, the City Attorney is hereb authorized to prepare whatever
describedubelow fromnthesowner theroofitoetheeCitynofeDe tfonproperty to
t or arel of an roftDenton,c State lof dTeeaI ng
All ilea that certt^4-Clot ounty
rly
of Lot
Records2 of of the WAdkis%oo County* Texas,des dinbeing a morepparticulaPlot
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel pin at the southeast corner of said Lot 210 and on
the west line of Woodrow Lane, also being the northeast corner of Lot
1 of said AdttssoN Addition;
a $tell sginnat the southwehst scorneriof
Lot 2,140 86 efeet minutes 16
of E said nort
said Lot 2;
THENCE south a9 degrees 18 minutes east 662.08 feet to a steel pin on
the west line of said Woodrow lane;
THENCE south 0 degrees 42 minutes west with vast line of said Woodrow
Lane and with the east line of said Lot 2,112.45 feet to the place of
beginning and containing approximately 2.626 acres of land, core or
less.
2. The City of Denton is hereby further
consideration tin Chi
Robert Hare as owner of said described proyer`y, other necessary t e
amount of 111,000.00 Purchase price, P
reasonable casts of clatinq.
acc accordance eCwithmtheet provision$ ofafthe
j TAI" 'assocy~d;osl shall rda
Its Pas Sa4e IF Denton City Srs :er.
PASSED APPe ;ED this the 7th day Of August, 1919.
w
C1OF DENTON, TEXAS
I~
ATTEST-
~I
gl~'N6Lf, t'TTi~fYA~tAR~
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
1IURJ "SbtCR6N5;" n ~CT7f "
ATTORNEY, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS .
f
q
f
I
I
COUNCIL AGENr,1A ITEM
SUBJECT:
i
Consider acquisition of property located on Woodrow Lane for
an Animal Shelter.
SUMMARY:
animal shelter Denton a ayear. We been looking two main criteria for a site for the
to locate an appropriate site. First, we looked for a site that would
be easily located and reached by any citizen needing to visit the facility.'
Secondly, we looked for a site that wouldn't have a substantial impact
on the property values of adjacent property owners.
We think the site located on Woodrow Lane fits these two criteria.
The only two contiguous property owners are the City of Denton, with
undeveloped park property to the south, and Mr, Hare who owns the large
u
time Is a ndeveloped tract to the north. The property offered for sale at this
residence,ptotmynknof that owledge,aisetheaDreamlandbApartmenteComplex,lwhich
is located'
ocated approximately 1,000 feet to the west. The closest single
family residence is also over 1,000 feet away near the corner of Woodrow
and McKinney. To the south of the site is a meat-packing plant tnd an
industrial park and, to the east, across Woodrow is an industrially
zoned sign shop. I don't believe that this proposed site will have a
substantial impact. on any of the properties mentioned above. It must
be remembered that this facility will be designed to the highest stan-
dards
ended SUnder y thand ese will
circumstances
there will be no odor problem.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
The overall budget for the proposed animal shelter is ;132,500.
Twenty thousand ($20,000) of those dollars are being contributed by
Denton County so that we can build extra capacity into the shelter to
assist those portions of Denton County that have no facilities. This
$20,000 is strictly for capital costs of the new facility. We will have
to negotiate with the County at a later date on charges for operational
i and maintenance costs.
T'•: :ryposed a:,.penditurss for the construction of the facilities
are:
$90,000 Building Costs estimated by architect
7,500 Architect fees
151000 Sewer extension
20000 Water and sewer taps
110000. Land acquisition
S1 2sOW Total estimated cost
i
Page Two _
ACTION RE~-UIRED:
If the facility is approved for this site, the Council needs
to take the following actions.
1. Pass a resolution authorizing the purchase of the site
located on Woodrow Lane.
2. Approve the preliminary site plan presented by the
architect and authorize him to proceed with the plans
and specifications.
ALTERNATIVES:
A. Enlarge and enhance the existing site.
B. Begin another staff search for another site.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the site on Woodrow Lane
be approved and the architect be allowed to proceed on the plans
and specifications.
i
I
I
I
1
~1 , yipI
r ~..~-........nanwllwr+wvu~•rr.«.rrrvw. rev...
1
t
City of Denton
I
Memorandum
August 7, 1979 1
I
AGENDA ITEMt
Consider site plan approval for a portion of Planned Development 24.
SUMMARY:
Planned Development (PD) zoning classification has a two-stage review pro-
cedure including first, approval of the zoning and secondly, review and
acceptance by the City Council of a detailed site plan. PD zoning, permit-
ting zero lot line residential development on 45' x 100' lots, a recreation
greenbelt area, single family (SF-7), and multi family uses was approved cn
a 65 acre tract located west of Stuart and north of Windsor Drive in 1978.
The next step in the PO procedure requires the developer to submit a detailed
site plan for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council on
each phase of development. In,March 1918, the Planning Commission and City
Council gave final approval to the development of zero lot line residential
dwellings oil the Stuart frontage of this tract. The petitioner has sub-
mitted a petition seeking to increase the maximum permissible units
authorized for the five acre apartment site from 100 to 1169 and this
recommendation will address that plan.
The proposed site plan indicates a satisfactory building layout. Two curb
cuts are proposed on Windsor Drive and the Trrffic Safety Engineer has in-
dicated they are adequate. A sidewalk is proposed along the Windsor Drive
frontage of the tract to assist pedestrian traffic. Also, a six foot
wooden privacy fence will extend across, the northernmost property line of
this tract in an effort to buffer the zero lot line residents to the north
from this apartment development. Parking shown com lies with the City's
standard of 1.5 spaces per one bedroom unit and 1.15 spaces for each two
bedroom unit.
RECOMMENDATION:
j The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the proposed site
plan for this portion of PD-24 with the following conditions:
j 1. Site plan is recommended for approval for the proposed development of
116 apartment units on this 5,089 acre tract, subject to approval of
the zoning amendment by the City Council. The building arrangement
and size, drives, setback., sidewalk, fence, and parking layout shall
conform to the submitted plan.
2. Advertising signs shall observe standards required by the Zoning
Ordinance.
3. A subdivision re-plat of this tract shalt be approved prior to issuance
of a building permit.
S
I
I
2
1
c '
The Planning and Community Development Department recommends approval of
the submitted site plan,
ACTION REQUIRED.-
The City Council should move to appprove the submitted site plan for this r
apartment portion of Planned Development 24, with the recommended conditions.
EX?iIBITS; ~
a Memo
bT Site plan
i ~
I
e
i
i
i
i
f
1 1i 5.
1
I
SITE DATA UNIT BREAKDOWN,
uq r r1V '
•rHAw PHA-A ' Tor/V.
ANTS AmeA b,oGq A. 1 4
TE"TAL WO OM1 UNirB I I A. akin 10 14 r 44
UCir2~a1TY (UNI?b/AGRCy 22,6
RBRU PdO PAi'.rrl" Itic b• TWO 19At Roc" 40 62 42
PRofbsedl~.K:klr.ks Iq2 -
TOrAL VO 8lr !Hr , I
rxAe[ 1 ( - reAU !
• ~IIIIIIIIII! VIII II II,1 I ICI illllll,If;~ ~
lIIIIIl III,II 1
I
! rAr 1
! i ` i I I
t A • i A 1
A ► .
[ i 1 A A t
A A
LLL A A \ \ •r~4
44 t 1 ,i
r . , ~ , , Lr_ 3331
wlw/ip° p°w [
SIDEWALK
KLAN
SITE PLAN FOR A"PORTION
OF PD-24 I`
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 7, 1979
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider site plan approval for a portion of Planned Development 2.
SUMMARY:
IJ
Planned Development (PO) zoning classification has a two stage review pro-
c
review and edure including first, approval of the basic land use plan and secondly, j
Development azoning lfor ~y the multi ifamily nuse andalimited detailed
use plan. papproved 1
on a 34 acre tract located on both sides of Coronado Drive, west of Bell
Avenue, in 1973.
The apartment areas have been completed, with the exception of one tract,
and there is now a proposal to develop the limited retail area at the
corner of Belt and Coronado. The developer has submitted a site plan and
building elevation showing his proposed development.
The Planning Commission feels that the development of this retail site should
i be reviewed very carefully because of its proximity to residential develop-
ment. There are low density apartments to the south and west and single
family homes located to the north and east of this site. The Commission
feels that it is important this site be integrated as much as possible
into this residential environment.
The site is this request is somewhat over an acre in size. The developer
is proposing a 6,750 square foot building located on the west side of the
property with the parking area near the intersection of Bell and Coronado.
The parcel has a "V shaped configuration, and there is no development
proposed for the south side of the property (see attached site plan and
' map). The Planning Commission recommends some basic changes to the peti-
setbacksfromgthelwesite sternplan
propertyincluding Hn , amore dumpreen sterrlocation ' and ienclosure,
and a limitation on signs.
RECOWENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the modified
j site plan for this portion of PD-2 with the following conditions:
1) A building setback of ten feet (101) shall be observed from the
western property line.
2) The trees shall be planted as indicated by the modified site plan.
The area indicated as green' space will be planted with grass. Also,
a low hedge 411 be planted immediately in front of the parking area
on the east sici of the property and at the end of the parking lot on
the west side of the property.
2
3} The duster shall be located as indicated on the site plan, and a
b x 6 wall enclosure shall be built on three sides of-the dumpster.
A plan for the enclosure will be submitted to the Building Official,
to ensure the proposal is compatible with the dumpster vehicles,
i
4) The building walls indicated on the elevation plan will be of masonry
construction. There will be no detached signs permitted. All signs
will be located on the building,
5) The uses permitted in the building will be neighborhood service in
character, such as a convenience store, and other small retail and i
office uses. A restaurant or club is not permitted.
The Planning and Community Development Department also recommended approval
of the site plan with the suggested changes.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The City Council should move to approve the modified site plan for this
retail portion of PO-2, with the recommended conditions.
EXHIBITSs
I a 1 Memo
b} Modified site plan I
i
' I
E
i
i
I
I ~
i
i
i
{
f S
t
~ i
>i
a,
y~y
1' I~~% E~2fid►ra Dh~ I
pro W ' r
DUMPSTER e'~n+ti
LOCATION'
' ' . ~ i ~ rII a ~I _ ~ •
SHRUBBERY
10, e 10
, , • a , ' P ~ _ ' ~ ~ 4
P. 01.4i44a
SHRUBBERY,
q~NC{ DNv~ 3
\ 1 117.1'. ti ~ r f
\ \ \ \ '9 u nr-;fir rlarµr7',
STAFF RECdMIE DED DT IC i
• \ PD-2;... I
\ \ \ SITE PLAN
.r
iii.
i
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 7, 1979
AGENT ITEM: i
Consider deannexation request of Mr. Richard Brodie regarding 25 acres
located along Highway 377 in southwest Denton County.
SUMMARY:
As can be seen by the attached letter, the petitioner seeks to deannex the i
frontage of his property which amounts to approximately 25 acres and adjoins
the west side of the Texas & Pacific Railroad in southwest Denton County, J
This 25 acre portion of the petitioner's property was annexed in 1969 as
art of a strip annexation along 377 (Ft, Worth Drive) totalling '1000 feet
p
in width.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
City taxes lost as a result of deannexation of the acreage would amount
to approximately $150 per year.
ALTERNATIVES:
! a} Retain entire acreage within city limits
b) Retain a portion of tract within the city limits
c) Deannex the entire 25 acres in this request
RECOMKOATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this petition
for deannexation, The vote was 5.0 with one abstention. The Planning
and Community Development Departmont staff expressed reservations about
incremental review and action on deannexation requests.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The City Council should move to deannex the property in this petition by
instructing the City Attorney to proceed with preparation of the appropriate
ordinance.
EX}iIBITS:
a Memo
b Letter from petitioner
c Vicinity map
i
j
j
2601 Tewa Ct. Na
lbuquQrque, N.td. 87111
June 26, 19f9
Denton City Council
Denton, Texas
Dear Sirse
We own a parcel ~,f land near Argyle, Texas Severe survey
ASST 1164, 88.08, TR JAS your tax notice 0 4751-002000.
In 1976 the City of Denton annexed a sizable portion of this
land in a strip nearest US Highway 377. 'dhen we inquired about the
reason for annexation we were informed that it was for the benefit
of the City to control the zoning, and consequently the land use,
on either side of US 377. 4e also asked what services would be pro-
vided by the City as a result of the annexation. We were told that
no services were planned but that the taxes would be set at the low-
est possible value--345.56 in 1976. The very next year (1977) the
taxes were increased to 4142,60,
This spring while in Denton, we discussed the matter with the
Denton Tax Assessor/Collector, He explained that since a sizeable
portion of the land was included within the City that he had no al-
ternative but to include it on the tax rolls.
At this time, we petition the Denton City Council to either
J de-annex the parcel of land or remove it from the City tax roils,
'I I Or, alternatively, reduce the amount of land annexed to the absolute
minimum possible along the road front.
Our reasons for making this request areo
- The City of Denton provides
no services or plans to
make them available in the foreseeable future,
j - The annexation was for the convience of the City only
to restrict development that the City might in the
future not have desired,
- 'do are only able to lease the land for not quite one
half of the combined taxes so that any unnecessary tax-
ation exacerbates an already unreal economical oituation,
- Our land does not even directly front on the highway
the KATY 2ailroad lies in bat,veen, This seems to con-
trsdict :he original motivation :or the 4it7's annexation,
Your consideration for this request will be appreciated.
Sincsr9ly
10 jinalia i*rd 1.charl :ridia
I
:Luz
4
t / SITE OF
BRODIE DEANNEXATION REQUEST
/ may.. M1
PETITIONER'S
PROPERTY KREQUESTED AREA
FOR
I / DEANNEXATION
(APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES)
I
' • ter,..
6
h13~
n7rr~ .
i
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 7, 1979
AGENDA ITEM: r
Consider disposition of excess city property located at the southeast f '
corner of Oak and Avenue E.
SUMMARY:
i
In order to extend Avenue E between Hickory and Oak Streets, it was necessary
for the City to acquire two residential lots. The design of the street
left excess property parcels remaining on the east side of new Avenue E,
adjoining existing residential properties. Mrs. Elinor Reinmiller (see
letter), has requested acquisition of an approximately 44' x 150' parcel
which adjoins her property on the west (hatched area on map).
The Planning Commission reviewed disposition of this excess public property
at its meeting July 18. It was the unanimous decision of the Planning
Commission to recommend disposition of the requested parcel. The City has
no public use for this remaining property parcel, if retained, the City
would be required to expend public funds for its maintenance. It is in the
public interest that the City dispose of this parcel and return it to the
tax rolls.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Thera would certainly be some main
as with
of this parcel. On the other handtethecCityswouldsrealize some evenuaon
from the sale and a small amount of additional tax revenue would accrue
to the City when this parcel is returned to private ownership.
RECOMMENDATION;
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended disposition of
tha excess street right-of-way. The Planning and Community Development
I Department staff also recommended approval of the request.
STAFF REPORT ON THE DEYELOPME?117 POTENTIAL OF THE SITE,
The property is zoned Single Family (SF-7), The tract does not meet the
minimum requirements for lot size in the SF-7 zone in that the property
is only 44 feet wide and not the minimum 60 foot width required by the
Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance does provide that existing proper-
ties which were lots of record when the Zoning Ordinance was adopted, and
which are smaller than the minimum required size, can be used for sinflle
family use. Since the lot has been reduced in size for the purpose of
street right-of-way following adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, it is our
opinion that this provision is not applicable to the property.
i
71
2
In order to qualify this property as a buildable site, a variance to the
minimum lot width requirement for SF-7 zoning would need to be approved
by the Board of'Adjustment. If this variance is approved, a 28' x 50'
house (1400 square feet) could be built on the site meeting setback re-
quirements of 25 feet in the front, 10 feet in the sideyard next to Avenue
E, and b feet on the other sideyard.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The Council needs to determine first, whether to dispose of the property 1
and secondly, whether the property is independently developable.
EXHIBITS; ~II
a Memo 1
b Letter
c Vicinity Map
j
i
i
4
'M
r ;
_ 0 T
• r
{
1
2033 W. Oak
Denton, Texas 76201
June 20, 1979
Mr. John Lavretta
Department of Ccmmunity Development
218 E. McKinnay '
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Lavretta:
I would tike to obtain the land now owned by the City which to
adjacent to the property owned by the estate of my mother,
Mrs. Clara Calmbach. This land, approximately 44' X 160',
is just west of the family home at 2033 We Oak.
i
i it do not believe 'he land could be used independently by any
1 other person and the best use aauld be made by myself, the
adjacent land owner. I have been told that the state law
allows you to sell the property to me,
By way of explanation, I have Inherited the estate of my mother
and plan to remain at 2033 W. Oak. I would like very much to
make improvements on the property - such as a garage - which
is impossible on the lot at its present size. '
I
I will appreciate your early consideration of my request.
Yours very truly,
.
ELINCR CALXARAC;H REINMILLER
~ ECR::m
Copy :o: Mr, Ray Stephens
81A Rtdgecrest
t Denton, Texas 76201
i
t
i
v
I
. J
PROPERTY FARM PFQUESru 1
FUR DISMIT103
' OAK ST.,
1 w j ~ !10 / x
~ of ,
: tit 4
r ,
Ili
I
City of Denton ,
Memorandum
August 7, 1979
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider the acquisition of several property parcels for channel improve-
ments and park improvements in the vicinity of Pecan Creek near Dreamland.
SUMMARY:
Our Community Development Grant has approved projects for park and drainage
improvements in the area west of Dreamland along Pecan Creek and its tribu-
tary. The drainage channels will be widened and sloped so that they can be
maintained and will be concrete lined in critical sections, to prevent ero-
sion. The park site will be developed on the north side of the channel.
Excess property acquired in connection with the drainage improvements could
be used as open space for the residents of the Dreamland (Phoenix) apart-
ments when they are rehabilitated. The Planning Commission has reviewed
property acquisition for these facilities from the land use perspective
f and is recommending approval.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Our real estate appraiser has completed his appraisals and is reccmmending
the following as just compensation for these six tracts.
Tract 1 Sheppard - Darrow Estate $9,000
Tract 2 Sheppard - Darrow Estate $3,800
Tract 3 C. P. Reed 11200
Tract 4 Burnett Flemings goo
Tract 5 C. P. Reed $2,000
Tract 6 A. M. McDade $ 600
This project, including property acquisition, will be funded entirely by
our Community Development Grant. The cost of acquisition reflected in the
appraisals does seem to fit within the project budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff has reviewed the appraisals and feels that they are reasonable.
The cost of acquisition reflected in the appraisals does seem to fit within
the project budget. We are recommending that the Council proceed with
acquisition,
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council, in considering other alternatives, could decide to:
1) Have another appraiser conduct real estate appraisals of these tracts.
2) Delete these projects from our approved Community Development Grant
program,
2
' J
ACTION REQUIRED: '
The Council should consider establishment of just compensation as reflected i
in the appraisals and authorize the City Manager to negotiate for acquisi-
tion of these tracts.
EXHIBITS;
a Memo
b Summary of Appraisals
c Map
I
LI
'r
I~
S.
48
tract t
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE
OF
VALUE OF THE VHOLE PROPERTY
i
The purpose of this real estate appraisal report is to
estimate the fair market values as described herein. This
report is based on all available pertinent data that could be
acquired, confirmed, and analyzed within the reasonable period i
of its ;.-eparetioh.
Primary evidence of value stems from recent sales, rentals,
and current construction coats of properties substantially
similar to the subject property. This is the most reliable
type of data and is accorded the most weight in arriving at
final-value estimates.
Secondary evidence from such sources as development,
builders, and the City of Dental a Engineering, Utility, and
Community Development Departments, and the USDA Soil Conser-
vation Service was utilized in estimating present costs and
.
feasibility of economically feasible alternative highest and
best uses such as, assimilation, or subdivision anO development
or cost to cure approach to any existing problems of an
j ,
inhibitory nature.
Because the-Cost Approach and the Income Approach are deemed
inapplicable the final estimate of fair market value
is based solely on the Market Data Approach.
The uniqueness of the subject property makes the resulting
I
opinion of market value based as much on "common sense" as
market data. Since approximately 90% of the subjeet property
19
Tract 1
is subject ot flooding the comparability of %hr, market data
Is less than desirable thus requiring the sei;rgation of the
subject into upland and.a flood prone areas and estimation of
their respective contributory value the whole property
based on each portions highest and best use as defined herein.
This yielded estimates of'$3,500 and $6,000 respectively
a
for a final estimate of fair market value of the whole
property of $9,600 as of May 9, 1979.
a .
I
s
.
r
17
Tract 2
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE
OF
VALUE OF THE WHOLE PROPERTY
The purpose of this real estate appraisal report is to
cstic,.ao the fair market values as described herein. This'
report is based on all available pertinent data that could be
acquired, confirmed, and analyzed within the reasonable period
of its preparat, n.
Primary evidence,of value stems from recent sales, rentals,
and current construction costs of properties substantially
similar to the subject property. 'This is the most reliable
type of data and is accorded the most weight in arriving at
final value estimates.
Secondary evidence from such sources as development
3 )
j builders, and the City of Denton's Engineering, Utility, and '
Community Development Departments, and the USDA $oil Consar- .
nation Service was utilizes in estimating present costs and
feasibility.of economically feasible alternative highest, and
best uses such ast assimilation, or s•Abdivision and development
or cost to cure approach to any existing problems of an
I inhibitory nature.
Because the Cost Approach and the Income Approach are deemed
inapplicable the final estimate of fair market value is
bayed solely on the Market Data Approach,
The uniqueness of the subject property makes the comparability
i
of the market data less than desirable and the resulting
i
3
1
♦ ti~
owl
18
Tract 2
opinion of market value is based more on "Common sense',
than any factors of value demonstrated by said market
data. In the true sense and definition of marketability l
F .
and market value the subject property's marketability
and the market value is pill, and only if the consideration
that the necessary legal action can be taken to allow
the subject to be utilized as assumed in the Highest and
Best Use Analysis can- any reasonable projection or estimate
of market value be made. For these reasons the final
estimate of fair market value of the subject property as
of May 9, 1979 is $1,000 for the 1.161 acre tract and
i
I
$2,700 for the 2,29 acre tract for a total of $3,800.
F
{
}
E
17
Tract 3
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE
C OF
VALUE OF THE WHOLE PROPERTY
The purpose of this real estate appraisal report is to I
estimate the fair market values as described herein. This
report is based on all available pertinent data thgt could be
I
acquired, confirmed, and analyzed within the reasonable period
of its preparation.
Primary evidence of value stems from recent sales, rentals,
and current construction costs of properties substantially
similar to the subject property. This is the most reliable
type of data and is accorded the most weight in arriving at
final value estimates.
Secondary evidence from such sources as development,
builders, and the City of Denton's Engingering, Utility, and
Community Development Departments, and the USDA Soil'Conser-
vation Service was utilized in estimating present costs and
feasibility of economically feasible alternative highest and
€ best uses such as, assimilation, or subdivision and development
i '
or cost to cure approach to any existing problems of an
inhibitory nature.
Because the Cost Approach and the,ingome Approach are deemed
inapplicable the final estimate of fair market value
is based solely on the Market Data Approach.
The uniqueness of the subject property makes the comparability
of the market data less than desirable and the resulting
opinion of market value is bstimed more on "common sense"
t
I
s
{
18
Tract 3
than any factors of value demonstrated by :paid market
data. In the true sense and definition of marketability
and market value the subject property's marketability ,
and market value s~ ,td only if the consideration
that the necessary legal action can be taken to allow,
the subject to be utilized as assumed in. the Highest and
Hest Use Analysis can any reasonable projection or estimate
of market value be made. For these reasons the final
i
estimate of fair market value of the subject property as
of May 21, 1979'is $1,250.
J
I
I
j
I
i
j
c ,
•
TRACT 4 21
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE
OF
VALUE OF THE WHOLE PROPERTY
The purpose of this real estate appraisal report is to
estimate the fair market values as described herein. This
report is based on all. available pertinent data that could be
acquired, confirmed, and analyzed within the reasonable period
of its preparation.
Primary evidence of value stems from recent sales, rentals,
and current construction costs of properties substantially
similar to the subject property. This is the most reliable
type of data and is accorded the most weight in arriving at
final value estimates.
' Secondary evidence from such sources as development,
builders, and the City of Denton's Engineering, Utility, and
Community Development Departments, and the USDA Soil Conser-
i
vation Service was utilized in estimating present costs and
feasibility of economically feasible alternative highest and
best uses such aa, assimilation, or subdivision and development
or cost to cure approach to any existing problems of an
I
inhibitory nature.
The Cost Approach indication was $180900. The Income
Approach indication was $180600. Both of these value indications
are considered as supportive data of the Market Data Approach
which was given the most weight in the correlation of th6 final
estimate. The market value indications ranged from $17,200
f
to $18,100 with comparable number one and two indicating
i
i
i
TRACT 4 22
$18,100. Comparable number is the most recent and comparable
and considered the most reliable indication. Sales in the
immediate neighborhood are presented in the addendum. The
sales in the adjustment schedule are more comparable to the
subject even though they are not located in the subject
neighborhood. Comparable number three is in the most comparable
neighborhood an4 is $900 below the other value indications.
This indicated that there is possible locational obsolescence
which was not included in the Cost Approach. If the $900
I
amount is utilized as the locational obsolescence, the adjusted
i
Cost Approach indication becomes $18,000 which is $100 below
i
f the value indications of comparables number one and two. The
final estimate of fair market value of the whole property is
G ( $18,100.
i t
t
l
r
TRACT 5
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE
OF
VALUE OF THE WHOLE PROPERTY
The purpose of this real estate appraisal report is to
estimate the fair market values as described herein. This
report is based on all available pertinent data that could be
acquired, confirmed, and analyzed within the reasonable period
of its preparation.
Primary evidence of value stems from recent sales, rentals,
and current construction costs of properties substantially
similar to the subject property. This is the most reliable
type of data and. is accorded the most weight in arriving at
final value estimates.
Secondary evidence from such sources as development,
builders, and the City of Denton's Engineering, Utility, and
Community Development Departments, and the USDA Soil Conser.
vation Service was utilized in estimating present costs and
feasibility of economically feasible alternative highest and
b it uses such as, assimilation, or subdivision 'and development
i
o. cost to cure approach to any existing problems of an '
inhibitory nature.
Li For reasons pointed out previously in this report tha Cost
Approach and tae Income Approach were not dtilized; therefore
the Dla-?;et Data Approach is the only indication of fair market
data available. The reliability of the value estimate is less f
than desired due to the limitations of the market data in this
segment of the real estate. market in Denton. The final estimate
of value of the whole property is $2,000. `
„ I
. Y~
L!
TRACT 6
RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE
OF
VALUE OF THE WHOLE PROPERTY
The purpose of this real estate appraisal report is to !
estimate the fair market values as described herr,in. This
report is based on all available pertinent data that could be
acquired, confirmedp and analyzed within the reasonable period
of its preparation.
Primary evidence of value stems from recent sales, rental$$
and current construction costs of properties substantially
similar to the subject property. This is the most reliable
type of data and is accorded the most weight in arriv9ng at
final'value estimates.
Secondary evidence from such sources as development,
€ builders, and the City of Denton+s En ineeri
g ng, Utility, and
Community Development Departments, and the itSDA Soil Conser-
vation Service was utilized in estimating present costs and
reasibility o: economically feasible alternative highest arid
best uses such as•,•assimilationi or subdivision and development
or cost to cure approach to any existing problems of an
'inhibitory nature.
Sizce the Cost.Approach and the Income Approach were not
utilized for reasons previously pointed out in this report
the f2:r! estimate of fair market value of the whole property
is based solely upon the Market Data Approach which indicated
$5,970.00.
W
f TRACT 6 21
4 ESTIRATE OF VALUE OF THE PARTIAL MKING
/ The same factors of value and approaches to value estimates
of the whole property was utilized in estimation of the value
of the partial taking. Based on these facts and data the
fair market value of the partial taking is estimated to be
$800.00.
ESTIMATE OP VALUE OF THE REMAINDER
Due to the shape of the whole property and the location of
the partial taking in relation to the whole property and
or.tsting improvementa, the remainder's highest and be.t use,
i
J and utility is relatively unaffected after the taking there-
fore, the value of. the remainder before and after the taking
is estimated to be $5,170,00.
SU2YLMATION OF VALUE ESTIMATES
Value of the Whole Property $5,970
Vuluo of the Partial Taking $800
Value of the.2emsinderi
Before the Taking $50170
After the Taking $50170
Damages to the Remainder _0-
Recommended Just Compensation 800
I
j
'r. "y v+Yw i AVYYY/.v.Nn Y`. wi..w~..e
1
c t F~ 3""f i ~wr, f ~!4` ...w t r " : q S.' . 4 v :
I To II I
v1j~q rrr e)4 ~aL~j
'4
t''. k,~ F ~ 5 ~ara~'`_ k~~^'{4~`~7':.;' S~• h~~.w d i f
12*11
b ?q
l j • a.~ 1 r ~ rim a9'if'f.l + y
tit r
- ~ ~.t :,yh • ~P, R..~.. 11 '',fC~r+r{ 1~.~' Yry - .air wa .•i # 1.
i... >a
I+. M 0
or D
Re !,t
Y •1.•'r~ 'a, ~F1i7: ~i ~ ~'4 v_,`~. y .y.{>4'P'rita. )..-.Y••r•~y -.~~¢da MML +,1Y~{y~y~r.
AQ +s. §_4i ~ •f Y 'c'S~'rs1 .'1 Add; +
`.j µ±J Jf ACRW
I e, Z 1 w. c, , x' ~
t r ' Y ~ o d57r~5 `
y r` r. "'r > ~yi`a ~,'R~~'a r ! . , ~ ,J*' yt, I r~~ ~ 1` ~ ~ r'"3~~F ~~.J~ry&, 4
. PRAIRIE
or ,34~
I s 1 ¢ f d ~ 4J(.(~~ 77,d1~~~+'yyxx 1` ~ e + i ~ - r ~`3
4 ~ t ~siY^ t ~ i + + Y`3 3 11rf , ~ r„W"' ~41•.
1.4
~ 'a 1~~ ~d w 1 ~ ~ ` y (It F ,p~~a{~~ ti 5 •
r{, J y wt v I d f iR' V t ' ~ ~ t r' 1f
/A' P
3 f, r r y", r! . i Y, %
"1 ~ r da )/174.
r~
I
I
r
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 7, 1979 i
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider recommendation of the Planning Commission regarding placement of
signs on property proposed for rezoning. ~
SUMMARY: j~
In order to broaden the public notification for zoning petitions, we would 1
initiate a program to require placement of signs on property that is being
considered for reclassification.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission considered the staff report regarding placement of
signs at their August 1 meeting, and 1s recommending the following:
1) Signs will be placed on the property requested for rezoning in a manner
established by the Council. It will be illegal to remove or deface
the siggns (an ordinance would need to be passed to establish these
points}.
Sign Policy
- The City staff will place the sign on the property, when the case is
advertised, in the best location for public view. Normally, this will
be next to the roadway and, when the case involves a corner lot, at the
intersection. For existin?h business property,'when it is impractical
to place the sign next to e roadway, it will be placed in the building
window, One sign will be required for property totalling less than an
acre, two signs for tract totalling less than three acres, end three
signs for larger tracts.
The sign will remain on the property until the case is decided by the
City Council. The petitioner is required to periodically check the
i property to determino th+tt the signs are in place. If they have been
4 removed or destroyed, then it is his res nsibility to replace the signs.
j Additional signs are available from tha Planning and Community Development
ff Department office. The petitioner will be required to remove the sign(s)
after the case is decided.
It will be illegal to remove or deface the signs (an ordinance will be f
required), If the petitioner is charged with violation of this provi-
sion of the ordinance, teen it will be the policy to table the case
replace the signs, and reschedule the public hearing for consideration
of the request. j
rill
2
The sign that we would use would be a simple cardboard sign mounted on a ~
wooden stake, similar in size and character to a typical campaign sign-
The sign would read:
I
ZONING CHANGE
REQUESTED
CALL 566-8350
FISCAL SUMMARY:
The materials for the sign will cost about $1.50 each. The staff would
not recommend that the zoning fee be changed at this time, but that the
fee be revised later to reflect increased cost for this and other items
required for processing of zoning cases.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Council could revise the proposed ordinance or policy recommended.
i
ACTION REQUIRED:
The Council should adopt the sign policy and instruct the Attorney to
draft the sign ordinance.
EXHIBITS:
a) Memo
l
j
I
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider an amendment to the contract with Shimek, Jacobs and
Finklea to include an apron area at the Airport in the engineering
plans.
SUMMARY:
There is a possibility that there may be sufficient funds in
the Airport Grant Program to also overlay the existing apron or
ramp. The FAA has indicated that if the funds are available they
would be willing to include the overlay of the ramp with the runway
and taxiway. I asked Carroll Finklea to prepare an amendment to the
engineering contract to do the plans and specifications for the ramp
so that the engineering will be done if the funds are available. The
ramp could then be bid as a bid alternate. We would then know at the
time of contract award whether sufficient funds are available for the
ramp,
FISCAL SUMMARY:
The proposed amendment to the contract specifies a set fee of
$3,400 for the plans and specifications for the overlay of the ramp.
The on-s
ction surveysrwillfbe $120iperidayeand $226 perndaystructionrespectfullline grade
f
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve the amendment to the contract with Shimek, Jacobs and
Finktea authorizing them to develop the plans and specifications on
the ramp.
ALiERNATIYES:
Don't consider overlaying the ramp at this time, s
x I
A
RECOMMENDATION:
The Airport Advisory Board has considered this item, and it is
their recommendation that the engineer be authorized to prepare the {
plans and specifications so the ramp can be bid as a bid alternate.
EXHISITSs '
1. Proposed contract with Shimek, Jacobs and Finktea, s j
'I
W.I
SHIMEKP JACOBS & FINKLEA
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
I
1300 Adolphus Tower Dallas, Texas 75202 Telephone (214) 742.3297
ROSS 1AC
ROSS L I. lAC0SS.
4,P.L
LC.FINK LFA,P.F.
FAMES L LAUGHLIN, P, 1.
R OVAL0 V. CONWAY, P. F.
CLFNNHI".P1. July 12 1979
,
R.T.CRECORY,P.F.
LARRY J. FREEMAN, P.F.
Mr, W. King Cole
Assistant City Manager
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
I Res Amendment to Eng!nearing Contract
for Denton Airport Overlay Project
I ~ I
Dear Mr, Coles
This letter will serve as ar. amendment to the contract between the City of
I Denton, Texas and 5himek, Jacobs & Finklea dated July 3, 1979 for engi-
nearing services in connection with the overlay of the north-south runway
and related taxiways. We would be pleased to furnish additional services
in connection with the overlay of the existing aircraft parking apron.
These services would Include Items (a) through (e) under phase I and 1
Items (a) through (k) under Phase II of the contract,
f ;
For the services included in the preparation of plans and specificadmis
and general administration of construction for the aircraft parking apron
work, we propose the lump sum amount of Three Thousand Four Hundred
Dollars ($3, 400, 00) payable as stated in the contract, j
For on-site obser:aace of the work and construction line and grade sur•
veys, the Lriginee: will furnish these services at a rate of One Hundred
Twenty Dollars ($110, 00) per day and Two Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars
($2L;.00) per day respectively, including transportation.
a
Mr. W. King Cole
City of Denton
July 12, 1979
Page 2
We appreciate the opportunity to perform these services for the City of
Denton and if this meets with your approval, please sign in the space pro.
vided and return one copy to us.
Very truly yours,
I. C. Tinklea, P. E,
Enclosure
Approved by the City of Denton
i
i
Date
Attest
j
f
;
I ! ,
J
i I r
1
dcus 0r
JUL 16 1979
CITY Of DENTON
MANAGER'S OFFICE
E
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF METING August 1979
AGENDA ITEM Sid e1 8674 Sanitation Compactors and Containers
SUMMARYI r
This bid is for the purchase of ten 2.3 cubic yard sanitary compactors with 42
cubic yard receiving roll off containers and one 4.0 cubic yard compactor with 42
cubic yard receiving container. These units will be placed into service by the Solid
Waste department at the various large solid waste customers throughout Denton. Places
such as Victor Equipment, K-Mart, Golden Triangle Mall, Peterbilt and Green Giant will
rec.;ive these units. Compactors and containers of this size are necessary to take full
advantage of the large diesel trucks we have recently put into service to satisfy the
needs of the high volume customers and to remain competitive with the private contract
hauler.
FISCAL SUMMARYI
After fulfilling the requirements for competitive bidding for the outright purchase
of these units we feel a lease purchase agreement will be the most advantageous to the
City of Denton.
I
Sill McNary, Director of Finance, has received proposals from three leasing
corporations specializing in equipment and facilities finding for local govermtents.
Of the proposals received Municipal Funding Corp of Amcica has offered the lowest
interest rates and most advantageous terms and conditics a of lease. Their lease agree-
ment does include a cancellation option at the City of Denton's discretion based on
appropriation funding.
Municipal Funding Corp. will purchase the packers any' containers from the vendors
we select from our bids at our bid price and then lases them to the City of Denton
on a five year lease purchase payout. The simple interest rate would be 9.239 or a
monthly rate factor of .02088 for a 60 month term based on the current prime rate of
11,50%, The funds for this lease purchase will come from the Solid Waste expenditure
account, loses of machinery end equipment, 01-33-83-09. The cost of this equipment
will be included in the service rates and will be posted directly to the commercial
customer. Delivery for these unite is four on October 1, 19790 five on March 19 1980
and two on October 1, 1981, as requested. Monthly payments will start only upon
delivery.
ACTION REQUIREDs
Approval of the bid and award as recommended by the staff and authorization of
purchasing scent to sign lease agreements.
ALTERNATIVESs
1. Award as recommended.
2. Award only a portion of the bid.
3. Reject all bids.
i
Page 2 .i
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONt
We recommend this bid be awarded in total to Industrial Disposal Supply in the
amount of $127,534.00, FOB Denton, with delivery as requested. We recommend the City
of Denton enter into the lease purchase agreement as reviewed under fiscal summary, i
We did receive three lower bids, however, they were for equipment offering leas J
pound per square inch compaction. Industrial Disposal Supply offered a 44.7 pound I
PSI compaction on the face of the compactor ram. The other bidders offered the
following; (1) IDS alternate 21.7 PSI, (2) Environmental Sales 26.1 PSI, (3) Duncan
30.5 PSI. As you cna see, IDS basic bid offers superior compaction. Compaction is
the key to solid waste disposal. The better compaction that is acheived the more '
refuse is hauled to the landfill in one trip. Naturally less trips to the disposal
ground saves man hours, fuel and equipment use. The major cost to the City of Denton
for this equipment is the number of trips to the landfill necessary to keep the customer
satisfied. We feel the approximate 30% higher compaction will mean less trips to the
landfill. The using department and the Purchasing Department feel that over the life
of the equipment the savings in fuel, manpower and equipment use will far more than
:ffsst the additional purchase cost. It is our recommendation this bid be awardad to
Industrial Disposal Supply for the total amount of $127,534.00. Wa, also, recommend
we accept the lease purctiasa agreement of Municipal Funding Corporatioh of America,
let them pay IDS for the packets and containers and in turn lease the units to the City
of Denton.
EXHIBIT$t f
Tabulation sheet.
1
1
I
Tom D. Shaw
Purchasing Agent
j
1
3
1ID /
1ID compartoja 1. .nntatn ra
1.D.S I.D.S. Duncan Environ-
)PEN June 28. 1919 Alternate Equipment mental
WCOUNT 1 Sales
1 QT . ITEM ES I TIO ENDO VENDOR VENDOR E DOR -VE-ff R DOR CIE OEJA
2.3 cu. yd. compactor
42 cu. d. ontainer
3 for deliver 10/1/79 10,783.00 9.555.00 9,941,00 9,685.00
i
5 for delivery 3/1/80 119458.00 90915.00 10,935.00 9,800.00
2 for delivery 1011/81 12,134.00 100486.00 120028.00. 10,150.00
4.0 cu, yd. compactor/
42 eU, vd, Container
for dilivery- 1 1~.b27AD t3.627;00 12 682.00 12 340.00
-en ton Denton Denton Denton
FOB
As as as as
Delivery requested requested requested. requested
Tem Net Net Net Net
p'
i
i f
i
77
• a
CITY OF DENTON
HEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING Austust 1, 1979
AGENDA ITEM Purchase order to Shermco industries, $3,175.70
SUMMITRY:
I
Purchase order number 39155 is to Shermco Industries in the amount of
$3,175.70 for the pickups repair and return of one 200 H.P.0 3 phase electric
motor. This motor is used by the water Treatment Department to power well 12.
In this case we were unable to determine the repair coat until the work was
finished.
FISCAL SUtWRY:
Funds for t%is repair will be taken from Nate: Plant Production Equipment
Maintenance acco:at number 04-60-83-39.
i
ACTION REQUIRED:
i
Approval by Council and payment of invoice.
ALTERNATIVES:
t None,
RECOMMENDATIONSt
We recommend this purchase order be approved for payment,
EnIBITSi
Purchase order number 39155, invoice number 3532,
Tom D. Shaw r
F Purchasing ASant
i
i
.
k
r
I i
r
4
7
' I
S Sher,r= Industries INVOICE No.
, inc. 9
❑ 2913 CONGRESSMAN • ASCO • DALLAS, TEAS 0 214 3584271 3932
❑ 2862 NAGLE ST, + GSD • DALLAS. TEXAS • 21435!4271
ASM/009 REMIT TO • P.O. BOX 20542 • DALLAS, TEXAS 75220
0 ~I
LL City of Demmem H
0 speum : Rat P 811Ma
T D410606, T~+:s 76201
0 0
INVOICE DATE OATC lNi►►IM JO/ N,111 1!111 ►u RCNAlc ORDER NUN/CR !NIP VIA
TZRIWI$
7/3/79 6/28/7 2096 39799 shermtao Orf f ix 1Xrle«.aMMeneh
rrim OUAN. QVAN. g GMrn an ApR6 Owr
No. f oROtRC / o ~o an
DESCRIPTION UNIT MICE TOTAL I
1 ; I 8 II.s. AC Motor - Vertiola 1
~ I
$07-8 ftlW10e, J
240 amps, 180 S M 22004 0 11
' S/N 134606 ,
i
i
Labor and material to:
1. Raviad 200-M aertioal stator
2. 1Eaplmn bearings (4 boasitlq mtch*d
sat of to mt bearings aid h a I,
bowl") at Qest. f
j 3. s t !'rw to reeome burned-on gross I
4. Three dips sad bakss *&kUag and lisal
epmey trisatasat.
5. Asseble, test aed faint
' Labor 511431.69
Msterlil _ 1 344.On
subtotal
Tax M173,76
TOTAL $3,778.30
k
DUPLICATE iNV01CE
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING AuRUSt 7, 1479
AGENDA ITEM P.O. 4 39549 to EMCO '
SUMMARYI
Purchass order number 39549 is to EMCO, Plainview, Texas in the amount of
$3,045.24. This purchase order is for one engine complete with hydraulic couplings
and pump. This unit will serve as an emergency standby engine assembly for use on
our EMCO solid waste packer bodies. This engine is prepared especially for EMCO
and available only from them. The fact that this is a single source replacement
part makes it impractical to bid.
{
FISCAL SGMMARY:
t,
Funis for this purchar~i will come from Working Capital Vehicle Maintenance
inventory Account, 05-98-8;-02. The engine will be charged to the using depart-
ment only when placed into service. .
i k
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval by council and payment of invoice.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve as recommended.
2. Return the engine and operate without an emergency spare unit.
I RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend this purchase order be apprc•?ad.
FMIBITS:
1 Purchase order number 39549, invoice 103778.
i
r,-. ~ spa „r
Tom D. Shaw
Purchasing Agent
3
'I
L. . t lvei l"u.by -r ~I I i ! Yjt'r~ '
P. D. BeR 1747
AS 79071
t I PLAINne 1 TE%
10 3 7 7 8
Phony t
tit ~1 2PE•E1St
f ' j •
p ; 101 EI7.71All „ l, { I {I
fffn~~~,T'4 'Q'~1 i'1 , ~''lll ~ • ~
.RWE~ 1 fYJ DATE
ORDER ' r
ADDRESS l; NO. `
AI A(k Alp 01 , C A 1A9 RAR:AAMTV Rllb AfRl $At[1 R i1111l,N{R,
jr;.r.i ~ Ir. ,l;,,e A.{ •J t ~ ty...
O AN. PAR NOr bESCRIPTION l PRIG 'Al. 041"1 '
l s 0 1
0~149 P40
1•, , I i Ir V~ ~r',!S ,ICI I
7, Tj-.
71
t'~ , FREIGHT ~ ~ ' ~ ~
TAX t
i ; NO REFUND "C's Rr TOTAL
• 111THOU1 THIS INVDICR 44.
1.•1'~",4r~,~M:.
7Y •[,l~i'~1 ~Ir~lr:$if~: i~rt~~I.~~rP [~'~`I, ' 'rl ~t'r i',i~. .,~f:d}J'i.4fdW>..•~'.,J.~'~l~F'I}7A
e
i
i
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 7, 1979
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider the final subdivision replat of Blocks 6 and 8 in the Meadow Oaks
Addition. 1
SUMMARY:
The property owner seeks to replat an existing subdivided tract which is
platted in 30' x 100' lots and zoned Multi Family (MF-1). The tract is
located on the east side of Mulkey Lane in the vicinity of Oaktree and
Meadow Oak Drives. It was the original intention of the property owner
to build townhouses on these lots, thus the reason for the 30' lots. j
However, the property owner now seeks to construct duplexes in this
location and the minimum lot requirements for a duplex are 60' x 1001. J
The proposal, therefore, is to replat the existing 30' lots into duplex
lots a minimum 60' in width. i
I
No site improvements for streets or utilities are necessary as a part of
this replat. Improvements were installed when the tract was originally
platted.
RECOMMENDATION:
j
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this
I replat at its August 1, 1919 meeting. The Planning, Engineering, and
Utility Departments have each reviewed the replat and recommended its
approval,
ACTION REQUIRED:
The City Council should move to approve the final subdivision replat of
F the Fleadow Oaks Addition, Blocks 6 and 8.
EXHIBITS:
Memo
b~ Map
j
j
i
i
l
I
N
~ Y
I
r ~
Oak TREE 'are.~~. r,~ , +
DRIVE tifs
6
N
Nn p r
o.
za; > N
i
,
E
e
~I 1 r s r a
r f
y +
N
WHITE Oa
DOUR r k 4 v.
i
r ~
y ,IN j
s v, 'I
A/ ?
fff j + I
2 l
ly I
' i ed6e,i.,e' I k`
YE1CC'IV OAK CA IV:
r
,
i ,
M~
I
i
City of Denton 1
Memorandum
August 71 1979 i
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider the final subdivision plat of Oak Meadows Additton.
SUMMARY: {
1
The property owner seeks to subdivide a 6 acre tract located on the north
side of Londonderry Lane and east of Teasley Lane, into one lot for the
purpose of constructing an apartment complex. The tract is zoned Multi
Family (MF-1). I
Appropriate utility and drainage easement requirements have been net, and {
i no street improveicents are necessary. Utility and drainage plans are sat-
isfactory for the development of the site.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of
this plat at its August'l, 1979 meeting. The Planning, Engineering, and
Utility Departments have each reviewed the plat ar.,± recommended its
approval.
{ ACTION REQUIRED:
t The City Council should move to approve 0e final subdivision plat of Lot 1,
Oak Meadows Addition.
EXHIBITS:
a Meta
I~ b; Map
I ~ I
rtuofrl~
1i
1
""Oka x11077 7
va./Ot 1/+011
i
~ t~birh 1 b~aM LsAMiI i
7r l15~V 1J 1 1 ! f W.iry 1 •}o>r1l LarrN
~ r ~ • 4 ~4Wl tR•
I ~ 1. fy
r I
:
I
•y O ,
1
r-.LCne tuNJ
x ^ ; y w
0 I I Q h I
I i f , i !t
_IL. I •n 7 I r1. LO 369
. I 4r \IYf0'A+t 6103
.,,,-A;1} LONDONDERRY LANE /
4 i I
t
pp~
OAK fME,L;CCWS
1 .PrEr •i2f.~E5. ~la.•d5 1
per! •'i5