HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-04-1979
sl .i J ~
a'
rwp~
i
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
September 4, 1979
i
Regular meeting of the City of Denton City Council, Tuesday, September 4,
! 1979 at 7:00 P,M, in the Council lumbers of tha Municipal Wilding.
Consider the minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 21, 1979;
1.
the Special Called Meeting of August 20 - 21, 1979; and the
Special Called Meeting of August 28, 1979.
2. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1413. This is the petition of Mr. John Stout requesting
annexation and Agricultural (A) zoning classification on a
1.58 acre tract. Tha property i9 located south of Highway
380 near the intersection of Highway 380 and Cindy Lane.
The tract begins 2401 south of Wiversity Drive along the
city limit line and measures 230' x 3001, i
B. Conduct a public hearing on the 3.979-80 Budget Request for
Operating and General Revenue Sharing Fund::. {
3. Consider reports from various agencies receiving financial
contributions from the City:
RSVP
SPAN
BEAO-9oatd ,
%D43=4
Visitors Convention Center
Cultural Confederation
Informtion and Referral Service
4~ .bC~.v QnA.: X111 II~l/YI
r k*" 4.
C dd M~.~...
1
~ l
a
M't 1
6 A Ordinances:
A. Z-1405 Bob Smith. Consider adopting an ordinance
amending the zoning map from Agricultural District to
Planned Development on 18 acres of land located at the
southwest intersection of mockingbird Lane and Audra Lane.
B. Z-1407 Linda Lavender, Consider adopting an ordinance
amending the zoning map from Multi-Family District to
Single Family District on Lot 3, Block 328 and also known
as 609 'Nest Oak Street.
C. Z-1406 Or. V. W. Redman. Consider adopting an ordinance
amending the zoning map on 3,766 acres of land located at
the intersection of Dallas Drive and Hopkins Drive, s
4 0. Z-1409 Denton Police Dept. (Animal Shelter), Consider
adopting an ordinanca amending the zoning map from
Multi-Family District to Light industrial District on 2,5
acres of land located on the west side of Woodrow lane ,3
mile south of East McKinney Street in the City of Den6
Texas.
E. Z-1397 Barry Wachal - Consider an ordinance amending the
Zoning Map opn Lot 68, Block 4070 consisting of 30 acres
of land from Agricultural District to Single Family.
<r
F. Z-1411 Bob Smith. Consider amending the zoning map from
31 Agricultural District to Multi-Family Restricted on
approximatelyy j,5 acres of land located north of
University Orive an,j west of the western edge of North }
University Place Addlt:on.
0, Consider an ordinance disannexing approximately 92,512
acres of land located on Highway 377 in southwest Denton
County.
H. A-1393 Tom Jester. Consider adopting an ordinance
amendij tre zoning map on the southern portion of -Lot 8,
Block 87.2 and containln, approximately 486,9 feet of
land from Agricultural District to Light Industrial
District.
AA, .~L
-417 S. 0.
4L
r
. r
,.':.yam '
& e, a dw~au u~ CA
Gensf Vannexation of approxi thg e1y*1500 acres extending from
the present city limits to 500' north of the center line along a
_ the entire length of the proposed north Loop 288, -
al _
it 1I Consider the final plat of the Golden Triangle Industrial ParkeTrAse'=,
Consider bids for the Old Post Office Building. Bid 1665.
!J Consider authorizing Freese & Nichols to begin engineering i'or a
liquid alum and sodium hydroxide facilities at water treatment
plant.
J~ b fit, Consider payment to freeie and Nichols for wo6: done on
proposed landfill sites,
.7.
Consider report` on the recently organized Texas Public Power
Association.
~ j / jW At. Consider setting the September li, 1919 Study Session Agenda.
k .
I
I
9-1-9 Q)
,k
R'
a:avl
5
X11 AREA PPgppppppSSEEpp FOR
a
I ANNEXATION
E i
.
0
h
q,
,fir r
r
J e
U lvten v or,
S
o~K
f _
~...~.J
~ e 1
6MLIt
LM a.1.itl1.3 .n ~n• • • a.....r n~ a.n i'.~h1i`q
A } 1
Y 5 " f ~
J
5
~ i KP
At
LA ',l T 'kOAD
F
1 i i 11.
.I • ~ v . ' i f a1~:
~ r.. a .',fit '~lo,~~~~ !!'f~4 ~ t+♦~h e, ,,•w. v. ~ .>i
I
' iC. "~1 it F E N 3 .t ~ yiY ~ar'..,1 ~Vb ,
i74 yk MtS q. , 1 , , " r rb o ? ~ti. t h! t '.e r ,
y Y . rl,V i~'i ~ C , > o f, •sd r t t b
If y i },t u 4pJS, , .1 4r T. 1~.~ ' ~[7 1 .Y'~ T !!>t
1d ,,..,4 }r r yr !
ti ~r1h¢¢'I ' y~l'(!71{R.I''4' t.'ae ~'•h Y
' r ~h AI~11 ~,"a IYf fi ~Vit ?J 1~ ! ,k h 1. tF!'.'S t~
~ '~i) iQCyx ~~~~y ~ {yt ! "1,`~F~ !h' e ~ ~ y ~ r'•:tt h~ t
a ''n,•7~t'.. "f y~il ''d'n'arh't i~r 00
t~e y\ t _ r I' a S
US, HWY 380 s
1 1 f' 4. h-, r w r~ ' '
+Pr I i, ~ 1 ~ 1;~ 1 I r i a ' " ~ ♦ ~ ! ~ l; Ht , J 'n _
{y~ C
1" kp+~ r'ti ~ r t~ r tr ~ I . 'y A
i t 1 , r + r A I t f ~ , ~ ~ a 1 } S^..". 1 I ~'4 :
r
PK~ n e ~ ~ _ r a I y~6 a ~ ear. r ' `.v l l ~ 1
~ "'~y e 1` ti ,ti • fir! 1 vii ,r,•,.i i ~ r
y~j~ t 1. I +
? e t r +0 a.. I r ~ r r .t: i ~ Il' a 1",- a~ .v
~ 'r• ~ ~~j v i' a v 1 r-
I (17
{ f~,..Yt;y ~ ff J~,, •~>f 4'~.r'k d ,M~;, ( r , 'iw L f,>~
J i~t
ete- ya 1•~t G~ }4*~y A Ji y[ r+:! `~1~ 1Rtry ' t " I i
's VI -1
p+ J ! r 4kC~
I L 1 l
`y (Cx "fill~K~ (ar S a 1 t4vr_'4) Z d\i x: t ,r
r a r hVk ~r6v ~,t..''{,~q h~~r'. "f1 /hY~ ` } ~ F 1"rr Y.. \ w { pit'' •e~
..r ~ay ~y~~51.r rN w rr hYA,~1} ~ t IN♦ I t is !r-4'1i f -
t~( f 111
fi Y J Iy I Y f0 L eY Y" L Y F,~"
I 1',~(" Her ~~A, Y~S. 1 4 y ! ^
1 4,4
n a (y y~ ~~i a+ 'i4o-
S 3?t'V' j L
if1. !Y t 7 tE J1 ~,f n nnasY 'a s ''1i V~ V '
~f A'l.f r•~~ ~ ~ '~I-A lr ~..r~t ~ N 1 4~' e o • r~`+J~
r 1 tv , a} f,
Q~~✓ I~ y ~~'i~~i (~y'4~ q+p~~ i ~ T^4c4Y'~a 'r q~+~',~, y,s,A S rx"' ,I~,f, r 11 + l ~ ,
i
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: King Cole, Assistant City Manager
DATE: August 30, 1979
SUBJECT; Plans and Specifications for Central Fire Station
and Airport Improvements.
M
k The architect for the central Fire Statior and the engineer
for Airport Improvements will be at the Council meeting on
September 4th with copies of the plans and sppecifications
on.their respective projects . Frank Medanich with First
Southwest Corporation will also be there with the necessary
f ; resolutions indicating our intent to issue certificates of
obligation. Frank is going to try to mail the resolutions
directly to the Council meu ors so that they will have an
1 opportunity to see them prior to the Council meeting,
We do have some flexibility on proceeding with central Fire
Station, but it is crucial that the plans and specifications
on the Airport Improvements be approved Tuesday g
ni ht. The
I~
` reason this is crucial is that me FAA must have this pproject
under grant prior to the end of the fiscal year or we lose
the funding.
III
f K
KC.gd
I
i
i
I
<n
u.~
r
City Council
August 21, 1979
i Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas Tuesday, August
21, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
PRESD7i Mayor Nash, mayor Pro Tom Stephens, Members Stewart and Hensley; City
Manager Chris Hartung, Acting City Attorney Burt Solamuts and Acting City
' Secretary Bill Angela.
WENT: Council Meciber Vela.
1. Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley that the minutes of the
Regular Meeting of August 7, 1979 and the Special Called Meting of August 14, 1979
be approved. nation carried.
2. PUBLIC HEAAAM:
(A) A public hearing was held on Z-lelt the revised petition of Mr.
Bob Smith, rseeqqn~mesti4 it change in zoning from Agricultural (A) to Multi Family
Restricted pff-R~ classification on a 6.5 acre tract. This property is located 600'
north of Univers ty Drive and 600' west of the western edge of the North Wiversity
Place Addition.
i i Mayor Nash opened the hearing.
After hearing one speak in favor cal none in opposition the hearing
was closed.
City Planner John Lavretta advised that four notices were mailed with
G none returned, He added that the Planning and Inning Commission unudmously vecoam-
ended apppproval, and no one spoke against the petition at the Pleming and Zoning
Commission meeting.
Motion was merle by Stewart, seconded by Hensley to approve the petition.
Motion tarried.
5. The Cowancil considered a presentation by the Denton Mall Campany relative
to the widening of Loop 291.
Martin Matany, Protect Manager, discussed some of the traffic probtams
expected at the Mail , a~ eked the Co=il permission to begin work with the City
Staff on widening of the Loop. - -
Ron Perry, Traffic Pinner for PANA Engineering Vim, also alwke an
I expected traffic problem He pointed out that the present design of the Loop
will not handle the traffic Prated Ey the Fell. He proposed that a "Texas
U-Turn' be constructed at eh: intersection of Loop 288 and 1.13 and that the Lnop
be widened to a minimum of four lanes,
Don Boalks, Vice president of Denton Hell Company presented the costs
associated with these projects utd asked for the Cltr'a asslstawo. Jim estimsted
that the "Texas V-Tun ' would cost a roximately 1350,000 and that the widening
of the Loop would be appraxiautely 1500,000. He advised that the Mail r
would pay for the entire cost of the "Texas U-Turn" if t1M City will pay for widen-
iinnyy of the loop. He also presented statistics exhibiting tk revenue that the
W I would generate for the City of Denton.
City Manager Chris Hartung suggested that action be delayed until all
aspects of the project can be evaluated.
Council Member Stewart pointed out other impacts of tha Mall, stettrng
that the City should use Its reney to take care of the other problev that the
Mall will generate for the City, but that we should provide some type bf asistente.
Mayor Nash stated that the traffic probltms at the mail would be a Clty
thhit he,waild litettol ee pthethCity pick up its share offthe iaonatd~h also said
Motion was made by Nash, seconded by Hensley that the Staff study the
matter and report beck to tthhe council. Motion carried.
August 21, 1979 Continue4
e. PROCLAMATIONS:
September 3 is)"YThe W~ee read a pprroclamation proclaiming August 27 thro,igh
(B) The Mayor read a proclamation proclaiming September 2 through
September 3 as Jerry Lewis Muscular Dystrophy Telethon Days in Denton.
S. CRDINA'M:
The followi-ig Ordinances were presented:
(A) Ordinance 179-58 (Carlo Farina, Jr.••21373)
AN =IW O AMENDING THE ZCNLNG MAP OF 711e CITY OF DENTCN, TEXAS, AS SAME NAS
S BY
ADOPTED AS AN APP>:+IDIX TO TIE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DVION TEXAL9
CRDINANCE No. 69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES 4 LAND
SHOWN THIS DAIS ON THE OFFICIAL TAX Mop OF M CITY OF DHNTON, TWS, AND MME
PARTICULARLY MSCRIDED WNrN; AND DECLARING AN E'•FWHIYE ]LATE.
I
I Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Stephens that the Ordinance
f be passed. On roll all vote Hendry "aye", Stewart "aye", Stephens "aye" and
Nash "aye", Motion carried.
(B) Ordinance 179-59 (Carlo Farina, Jr.••2.1374)
AN CRDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DHNI'ON, TEXAS, AS &W NAS
ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO IM CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DO7RT1 TEXAS, BY
j CRDMICE NO. 69- 1, AND AS SUO MAF APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 10.2 ACCRF~ OF LAND AS
%W THIS DATE ON 71E OFFICIAL TAX HAP OF THE CITY OF DEMON, TEXAS, Alm MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED 11fJtEIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Notion was made by Stewart, seconded br Hensley Wt the Ordinance be
passed. on mll call vote Hensley "aye", Stewart 'aye", Stephens "aye" and Nash
'ayd'. Motion carried.
j (C) Ordinance 179.60 (Carlo Farina, Jr.-•21375)
AN ORDINANCE 46DING THE ZONING HAP OF THE CITY OF DEN ON, WAS. AS SANE 1915
ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CXe OF ORDDQA W OF THE CITY OF DENI'Oi TTOUS BY
ORDINANCE NO. 69•l, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 23.4 ACRE OF Uh AS
SHOWN THIS RITE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX W1P OF T1rM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECT WE DATE.
Motion was mode by Stewart, seconded by Hensley that the Ordinance be
passed. On roll all vote Hensley "aye", Stewart 'aye", Stephens "aye" card Nash
"aye". Motion carried.
(D) Ordinance 179-61 (Robert Nelrh-•2.1601)
AN ORDINANCE APMIN0 A TRACT OF LAND CUITIOUOf1S AND ALUACENl' TO IV CITY OF DENTON,
TIMAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT TRACT OR PARCEL OF W CONSISTING OF .APMIMATELY 45
ACRES OF LAW LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COLKIY OF DFNIGN, STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING IN TIE A. GIBSOM SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 491, DeM CORNN TEAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SAW As SINGLE-FAMILY "SF-16" DISTRICT PROPERTY; Aim DBCLUING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Motion was merle by Hensley, seconded bX Stephens that the Ordinance be
passed. On roll all vote Stewart "aye", Hensley 'aye", Stephens "aye" and Nash
"aye". Motion carried.
(E) Ordinance 179.62
AN ORDINANCE OF TIM CITY OF DENT N, TEXAS; PROVIDING POR IM POSTING OF SIGNS BY
THE DIRECTCR OF ?"M UPON THE APPLICATXN FOR A ZONING CI AN(S OR A SPECIAI
PERMIT; PRWID'NG FOR REQRIIRII4HNTS FCR THE SHE, LOCATION AND COTem OF SAID
SIGNS; PROVIDING A PFli4L.TY FOR Ri34PVAL OR DEFACING OF SAID SIGNS. PROVIDING FOR
SbVEWILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley that the Ordinance
be paasod. Or roll call vote Stewart "ayd', Fawley "aye", Stephens "aye" and
!Lash "Aye". Notion carried.
r x
axa~
August 21, 1979 Continued
o, RESOI.IfIIt]NSt
(A) The Council considered the following Resolution creating the
Denton }lousing Finance Corporation and appoLnting the Hoard of Directors theretntat
AT A REGULAR METING OF 1191 CflY COUNCIL OF THE CM OF W4TCN, TEMS, HILD tN M
M NICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON 1191 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, A.D. 1979.
RESOLUTION
MiERPAS, an application in writing seeking the incorporation of a bowing finance
corporation under the provisions of the "Texas HousLng Finance Corporation Act"
has been filed with the City Council of the City of Denton (the "City") by at
least three individuals, each of tdtca is a cititen of the State of Texas, of the
age of 11 years or more and residents of the City;
NLM TMREFOP20 BE IT RESOLVED SY 7W C17Y COUNCIL OF 71N. CITY OF MY", TEAS, TI ATt
SBCIION L
That, the City Council of the City has farad and determined, and hereby finds and
determines, that it is wise, expedient, necessary, or advisable that the corporat-
ion be formied.
1 ! SBCTICN It.
That the City Council of the City hereby appraves the form of articles of incorp-
{ oration proposed to be used in organiting the corporation, a copy of which is
1 attached hereto as "Exhibit A", and hereby grants authority for the lncorporatlon
of the corporation.
SS-11ON 111.
That, the City Council of the City hereby deal~utert the Corporation for purposes
k of subparagraph D of panpraph (b) (1) of Section / of ii.& 3112 as reported by
k the Howa V1 s and Went Committee of the United States Fkwse of "resentstives
4 by vote of the GanMlttea an July 30, 1919.
SBCTICN M
That it is hereby offl•'slly fond and determined: that arise of emergency or
i urgent public necessity exists which re wires the holding of the meetingf at which
this Resolution is o4ted such emergency being that the "Option of this Resolu•
I tion is necessary for the Incorporation of a hassiry fiance corporation under
Ef the "Texas Hosing Finance Corporations Act", and that the proceeds free the
I issuance of such corporation's bads are needed as soon se possible W without
delay for necessity and urgently needed residential howlty fot persons of low
and moderate income within the Cityl that said meeting was open to the public as
required by law, and that public ratico of the time, plate, sad ppvufrppooto of said
aaeting was given as required by Vernon's Amt. Civ. St. Art. 623Ml as amended.
SECTION Y,
that all OrdirAwes and Resolutions and parts thereof in conflict herewith are
hereby expressly repealed insofar ss they conflict herewith.
SECTION VI,
that this Resolution shall take effect Ltmedistely from and after its adoption,
and it is accordingly so resolved.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21st day of Auguat, A. D. 1979.
A1TM , MRR
IsE FIDLT, "CITY ~€AI£1AA4
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
i1
,
August 21, 1970 Continued
lotion was made by Stephens, seconded by Henley that the Resolution be
passed. Cn roll cell vote Stewart aye', Hensley "Aye", Stephens aye and Nash
"aye". Motion carried.
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley that the following be
named to the Board of Directors of the Corporation--Chris HartM, Bill W-%ry, Bill
Nash, Ray Stephen, Dirk Stewart, Roland Vela and Bud Hensley, Motion carried.
7. The Council considered a report on bird control in the City e.f Denton.
Assistant City Manager King Crle briefed the Co+sncil on the continuing
bird roblems, citing that the swallows ray have returned to Crpistrano, but the
blacJirds are back in Denton, He said that there had been several complaints on
birds and that we will be scrapping the old methods of control, and asked that the
Couc it approve the new program which will be directed by Sally trdman. He suggest-
ed that the City of Denton and Texas Nman's University share equally in the program
Cost. The proposed cost of the program is as follows:
8 3,688 core labor force of 6 employees working 1,296 man hours
j at min"'M woes
320 purchase of 16 additional Clow guns
6,000 purchase of 60,000 rounds of Clow gin amrrnition
9,600 consultant fee (Sally Erdman)
500 trkvel expenses for consultant
$00 miscellaneous expenses
j75;EII8' Total program expense
f Sally Erdman, Ornithologist, announced that the pro gqram would not be a
guaranteed solution to the problem, but that she expected goad results.
E
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Stewart that the program be
i approved as mocrended by the Staff, Notion Carried,
The Council was to have considered a report by Dr. Roland Vala cauern-
Ina the incidence of rabies In the State of Texas and consider developdi a now
rubies control program, Sines Dr. Vela was not present, this item maul not
ff considered. J
! 9. The Council considered disposition of property on the east We of 1
Avtmje E between Hickory and Oak Straits.
3 C!ty Planner John LvTetta reported that after checking with the Director
of Parks arh Recreation, It was fond that the property is not developable b a
City park. He added that neither side of the property was developebla harder our
present toning ordinance, Cad that there was no need for the City to retain the
property.
Mayor Pro Tea Stephens suggested that we following the recommendation of
the Planning swat toning Cmnission to sell the property so It could be put back in
the tax roll swat generate revenue for the City.
Notion was made by Steuart, seconded by Stephens to declare the property
undeveiopabie with the aw&Awt that no curb cuts would be Allowed, and that
the roperty qua up Eor bid to the general public and that the City will retain
A l a d right-of-way. Notion carried,
10. The Council considered a contract with the Department of Housing and Urban
Development for the 1979-OD Corosnity Dovelotment block Grant.
John Loretta briefed the Caumcil, recommending that the Cawcil accept
the Howl and Urban Development Cmamnosign ity Development block Crant in the amounnt
of (749,350 end authorise eha Mayor t the great, He also stated that HUD
~rmising its gggrarntoEwlasI bbut thhat*Nwadd~Dprob b y not ba any ma orTM
changes Cad that we a uld work out the problems with Ft1U when the tIN carves.
W Urban Drvetn ~anCde mitteDeve, seconded by Stewart to accept the Huai3
opnent y elopment Stock Grant in the amount of 8744 350
W authorite the Mayor to stye same. Notion carried.
4 WedMw~✓~+7ti 1~=Wi Y'J9we
i
August 21, 1979 Continued
11, The Council considered a recommendation from the Citl Manager's Office
concerning computer services.
Assistant City blarepper King Cole briefed the Council on the current
problems we ate experienci to Data Processing and pointed out sclutiom to
the a problems. He asked the Coacil to authorize the City Manager to proceed
with plans for implamenting Xerox Crmp,ter services,
! Cengit CaPvt, Data Processing Director, presented information relative
to the Xerox study. He stated that he felt thrt we could work out the problems
with ! a lack present epxsnicationebet*vensnaand that nagement~and staff, He recennended that Jwe
stay with our in-house computer syitm.
Fred Mercer, District Manager for Sperry Uhivae, claimed that the City
could not cancel the contract without legal ramifications.
Cc= it Manber Stewart asked about liability under the contract with
h , Sperry Univac,
Acting City kttomW Meet Solomon was of the opinion that we can
legally terminate the contract.
The Council rectssrd at 9 p,m.and reconvened at 9,10 p.m.
k Mayor Pro Tom Stephens suggested that the utter be tabled for further
study.
Motion was node by Stephens, seconded by Hensley that this iten be
tabled for further study. Motion carried.
f 12, Motion was rade by Stephens seconded Hensley thvt the Tax Ad ustma,t
Report for one, 1^79 in the osonnt of 16,638.41 Le approved. Motion carried 3
to 1.
M 13, The Council considered a reccownxiation of the Denton Electrical Code
hoard concerning proposed changes to the Electrical Code.
I ! port Solomon brJefed the Cotmeil rn the proposed changes in the Elect-
rical I Code ordinance. The Staff recorreended •?at clanias be made in order to
i reduce the 3 year exaerience saquiresent for a journeyman IIcense, and those
peap1e concerned only with residential wiring methods. She other prop*.. amend-
sents were for clarification purposes only.
Motion was aide by Hehsl4y, seconded b+ Stephens to instruct the City
` Attomey to prepare the appropriate ordinances. Motion carried.
14, the Couuil coaidared the final plat of the Golden Triangle Industrial
Park, Phase 111.
City Planner John La'rretts briefed the Council, sluing there was still
a question as to the paving of Mavt ill Road. The ria, Suft receeemerded that we
require the developer to pave thn particular section.
Mike Ramos, reppr~esentl~g Golden Triangle tnduatrial Park, stated that
it was questionable whether Mayhiil Road can he considered an improved or unimproved
road.
John Lavretta claimed that the road is not presently paved in accordance
with City specifications and that the road cannot handle the truck traffic that
would be gerarsted by this Industrial park,
City ltanzger Chris Hartung :fated that according to rent polity we should
stoke the developer Paw the road.,
Mayor Nash asked that the Staff look at our present policy for pos4ible
changes.
CA Motion was made by Nash, seconded by Stewart to table the matter, Motion
rrled,
s
R`M
August 21, 1979 Continued
IS. The Council set the August 28, 1979 Study Session Agenda.
16. OMSENT AM":
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Stewart that the follavLig
Consent Agenda F, approved with approval of the final subdivision plat of the
Village, Phase 1 removed. Motion carried.
(A) RFFEkRAI.S:
(1) Z-1,i5, the petition of Mr. Robert Nichols, requtating a change
in toning from Agricultural (A) to Single Family (SF-13) classification on a 10.45
acre tract was referred to the Planning and Yon Commission for its recammendation.
('this tract is located southwest of the intersection of Teasley Lane and Pennsylvania
Street.)
(B) BIDS/FUROOS8 ORDERS:
t (1) Bid 18679, aerial signal cable, awarded to the law bidder, Temple,
i Inc, at a total price of $9,000 FOB, Denton, Texas.
(2) Bid 18680, utility poles, rwarded to the overall bidder, Inter-
national Paper Company.
1 (3) purchase order 140164 approved to Priester SIly Company in
the amount of (5,994 for McGraw-Edison electronically control 6d .00 map switches
with hangers.
(C) PIATS:
(1) Final subdivision plat of tha College Park Addition was approved.
f I (2) Final nmbdivision rcplat of the Heritage Oinks, block 3 approved.
(3) Final subdivision plat of the R. B. Ford Addition approved.
(4) Final subdivision plat of the Alton Davis Addition approved.
17. The Council considered final subdivision plat of the Village, Phase 111.
Mayor Nash abstained from voting because of engineering work,
Mayor Pro Tam Stephens took the chair.
Motion was made by Henstay teeatdad by Stsppyherty that the final sub-
division plat of the Village, Phase ~tI be apptt,ved. Notion failed with 2 voting
for 1 agilmt and 1 abstaining.
E l6. The Council adjourned into Executive Session at 10:50 p.m. to discuss
?egai matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments.
L9. the Council reconvened Into Public Session it 11M p.m. to announce
the following Board appotntMtn
1111 G11V &wrd
June Brownlee 1979.81
Bill Claiborne 1979.60
B1rtrial Coda Board
j George Olufsen 1979.81
Plumbing and Mechanical Code Bowl
George Becker 1919.81
S. W. Wright 1979.80
..,..,...,q..w;,RCaR
~a
bust Ml
` - V
1 j
August 21, 1979 Continued
RFD Zoard
Gerald williamson 1979.82
Board of Adjustment
Ninby Self 1979.80
Motion was made by Stephens, secwded by Hensley that the above Board
appointments be approved. Motion carried. '
20, the City Manager rtcammnded that Donna Jews be appointed to the Civil
Service Commission.
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley that 1Yxm Jeanes be
appointed to the Civil Service Ccmdssicn. Motion arris'.
i
Meeting adjourned at 12;00 a.m.
jr
I ~
1
i
f ~
w w ► ~
j ~
I`k I
t
I
t
I
' I
r
I
t City Council
August 20-21, 1979
sm;itl called Meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, Mordty,
August 20, 1979 at 8:30 a.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Mmicipal Building.
PRESEYT: Mhyor Nash Mayor Pro Ten Stephens, Council Hankers Vela, Stewart old
Hensley; City Manager Chris Hartung, Acting City Secretary Bill Angelo
and Finance Director Bill WYAry.
1. The Council considered a Resolution authorizing the City to intervene in
the Texas Railroad Commission case docket No. aM2067, Lone Star Gu Company request
for increase in the City We Rate.
After a briefing by the City Manager the following Resolution was presented:
AT A SIECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF rtM CITY OF DFMgi, TD(AS, MID IN THE
"IC1PAL BUILDING OF WD CITY :14 11-W 29TH DAY OF AUM, A.D. 1979.
RESOLUTION
*FAEAS, on August 1, 1979, Lane Star Gas Company applied to the Texas Railroad
Comeission for an increase in City gate rate charges, and
M19'IiFAS, current gas rates in Denton provide for the flow-through of increases in
the City gate rate which are authorized by the Texas Railroad Commission; and
*0W. the requested change in rates would result in irr:reased charges to resi-
dential and Maercial gas erstom es in Denton; and
r 1OMILS the City Managper and the Staff have in the pest corpersted with other
Texas cities in proceedinga before the Texas Railroad Commission to protect the
interests of Deatan gas customers, and recommend participation in the following
I described proceeding in a similtar manner.
NOW, TIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY On CIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, IM, MV
Section 1.
The City Manager and the Staff are hereby authorized to intervene and particippxato
in proceedings before the texas Railroad Commission, case docket mseber G19 or?
whereby tone Sur Gas Comp v has requested an Increase in City ate rate charges,
to insure that the interests of Denton residential and commercial gas custamers
are prgerly protected.
Section IL
€ The City Manager and the Staff are hereby authorized to cooperate and join with
other Texas cities in these proceedings.
Section III.
This Resolution shall take effect imeedistely upon its passage in accordance with
the provision of the Denton City Charter,
PASSED AND APPhAVED IRIS this 20th day of August, A. D. 1979.
a, L.L 1001, MYOR
ATfESTt CITY OF D6* M, TEXAS
/aE AN
bREitASr
CITY OF DMNItN, TEXAS
APPPMD AS TO LEGAL FORM:
e
WKI K. 5ULJOKM AC
CITY OF MWCN, hFXAS
h
i
August 20.11, 1979 Continued
1SensI that the Resolution be
Motion was made by VeL, seconded by a . o , and Stephens
passed. Ch roll call vote Vela aye ,Stewwart eye , Hen~lt vo vote.
rye . Nation carried. W yor Nash wws not present during the
1, The council received a report an the city of Denton Operating &dget
from the city Manager and Staff.
No official action war taken.
3. At 1:13 p.m. the council recessed until 11:30 A.m. the following morning.
The Council reconvened at 11:30 a.m. Tuesday, Au"t 11, 1979 and continued
deliberations on the proposed hk4tt. No official action was taken.
S. Meeting adjourned it lot$$ a.m. August 110 1919.
E ~ ~ s a
s
a
~i
4 '
j
h
t
City Council f
August 20, 1979
Sp ial Called Joint Meeting of the City Council aM the Airport Adivsory Board,
aM a Special Called Meeting of the City Cancll of the City of Denton, Texas,
Tuesday, August 28, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chrurxr of the Mmictpal
BuiIJing.
PRESENT: CoumciI: Mayor Nash, Mayor Pro Tea Stephens, Mumbers Vola, Hensley,
an'd'Suvart, City Manager Chris Hartung, Acting City Attornry Burt
Soloeans and Acting City Secretary Bill Angelo.
h Airport Board. Dr. Gene Wright, Dr. John Carrell, Julie Marshall urd
e e
JOINT NMWG OF THE CITY CULXIL AND THE AIRPORT ADVIS'tltl' B=:
1. Aspects of the Muticipel Airport, including the re negotiated contract
with Aerosmith Denton Corporation were considered.
Dr. Gene Wright of the Airport p
to the Council, stating that they recommended ndd thaatstheeCouuncil acceptitthed~trractct.
He also stated that the Airport Board worked very hard with Aerosmith on the
contract and both were in agreement with the contract.
Assistant City Manager X Cole presented a Revenue Comparison Chartj contrasting revenue generated from a 1975 contract and the tevenm generated ~
from the 1879 contract.
f Dr. Wright stated that the new contract includes all of the 14 points
ice the Council wanted in the contract. He also stated that the new contract
!Iro Cy improve the ambiguities of the 1975 contract.
Cooncil Member Stewart was concerned with the melntenance responsibilities
of the contract.
Dr. Wright stated that there wis v nvw mahntenanee responsibilities
for the Clty under the 1979 contract that 'we would not want to assume anyway.
f of the A! Mott n was a~ by Stephou seconded by Nish to accept the recmmaan, ition Bard far the tip and word resit e.v congratulations and appreciation
fora.) spent the contract. (Motion was not voted on-jot motion
Council Member Vela p sJ a substitute motion to accept the report
aM to set It to for furthat delratiao. After some discussion an the substitute
motion, Stephan withdrew hie orrlsloAl motion.
accepted ardrthe mmatteratab forsme~weak, otrion carried.rlat the report be
MEETING OF THR CITY CMILr
1. The Council cauidered encouraging the development of a conaanity long
range planning committee.
Ma Pro Tem SuThans stated that in light of the City beLng on the
threshold ll exploil" gmth It is time to rethink our situation and reset our
k+'1s. He suggested that we establish a Ions range plainer committee to be
entitled "t?entun !01e; Directions and Decisions', and that he be appointed to
set up a steering committee.
Motion was made by HHerul , seconded Ly Stovstt that we establish a
long range Planning conrdttee with Ray stephou sppointed to top 01P a steering
committee. Motion earr:,d.
'r•us~.~WtiW+Y
Y
• arex~ .
August 28, 1979 Continued ,
2, the Council considered a recoeendation from the City Manager's office
concerning computer services.
City Manager Chris Hartung briefed the Co=il.
Council Member Hensley stated that he would like to see the computer
system stay in hoot. He also requested that an investigation into the
tenure of the City Manager be placed on the next agenda or at the next Executive j
Session of the Council. He also asked that an independent inquiry be made into 17
the City Manager's proposal to contract for Xerox computer services.
Conch Member Stewart stated that he would like to see the corputer
system stay in house for a period of 1 year to see if the problems of the present
system could be worked out, with an animal performance review of the Data Process-
ing Department, lie also stated that he had been told by representatives of Sperry
Lhivac that they would give the City a corporation court ticket tracking program
and an average utility billing program free,
Fred Mercer from Sperry Univac agreed to this, statLig that they would
also provide the City with the staff to implement the new programs at no cost to
the City. In addition he stated that Sperry Univac would help us find solution
for ether problems we are expecting with the computer services,
Council Member Stephens addnd a point of clarification, stating that in
his opinior any motion incorporate that the City accepts alternative 02 in the
Alexander G.-ant report the# we retain the in house computer system with a limited
staff.
{ Mot!on was made by r...•tey., seconded by Vela that we retain the in house
computer system with a limited r .ff. Motion carried.
illness At this point Council Member Bud Hksuley left the meting because of
3. The Council xanidered a report by Alexander Grant Company concerning
utility transfers.
i ~
Buford Rhodes, representing Alexander Grant Campeny, briefed the Cotacil.
Winfred Paschal of Alexander Grant presented a report end answered
inquiries ref the impact of discontiraring the utility transfers, end the impact on
taxes which would be necessary to offset the discontinuing of that transfer. Me
report presented by Alexander Grant is on file in the City Secretary's Office.)
The Council received the report, No official action was taken.
4. ]he Council received a report from the Charter Revision Committee rel-
ative to proposed Charter rsb&dIts.
Charldean Nr vll, Chairperson of the Charter Revision Camdttee, nbmlt*ed
e report to the Council on the necessary dwges. In addition, she briefed the
Concilonthe highlights of her report, stating that there were four major cate-
gories stic changes.-political changes, administrative changes, deadwood chant'*s and
stylistic change. She stated that the Council should review this report, modifying
and/or adding any items they den necessary.
members of the Cotmcil r whVels. o wrootedthe it Minority Reporrt. Nom of these members
were nresent.
nd c=**, Notion
the Ccrosltt" fore tthir, diligent end end hind woork : h the t In cc onstrt
a nw
task of reviewing the (harter, Motion carried.
It was else discussed that the Council should take the matter nsder
consideration at a study session and than schedule the proposed Charter changet
for a public hearing,
S. The Council was to have considered an ordinance amending the toning tap
by amendin~g ordinance 78.1 Section r, No. 1 to permit 116 units on 5.1 *trot of
land out of Lot 20, Block 136.8 on the request of Robert Hann. ('rillaga, Phase III)
This item was postponed until a full Council could be present.
..__.,m.• .,.a:.w,xshVxlxlFSha,Cr ~Y+'Yd:: aF, i+~~+.a..
AA
August 28, 1979 ContLrawd
e. The cm ncii was to ha%v considered the final subdivision plat of the
Village, Phase 111.
This item tiers N.,tponad until a flill Council could be present.
7, the Council considered instituting annexation proceedings on s 314 sore
tract located on the north side of Highway 71 between Bonnie Brae and Riney Road
and zoning the property light Industrial (Lt).
City Planner John lavretta breefed the Council.
i
Council Member Stewart was cancemed about the proposed Loop 288 project
and its imrs.t on the property In question.
Reddy Johnston, Attorney representing T.I., stated that T.I. would be
willing to work out any problems regarding the Loop and the t.►.ation of their plant.
Motion was mado by Stewart, seconded by Stephens to instrxt the City
Attorney to proceed with annexation proceedings. Motion carried.
8. The Council cauide•1d implanentation of 'Truth in Taxation" procedures.
No action was taken.
9. The Conch considered authorizing the City Manager to s.ga a contract
renewing " agreement with the Professional Appraisal Caq% y, Inc. for tax
appraisals.
City Hanger Chris Hartung briefed the Council and recommended approval.
1 lotion was made by Stewart, seconded by Vela that the contract be
approved with the City Rosier authorized to sign some. Motion carried.
to, The Co=il recessed into Executive Session at 10:00 p.m. to discuss
` legal mutters, real estate, personnel and board xppointeents. {
i it. The Council reconvened into Public Session at lo:SO p.m. to annouic:e I
that no official action was to ba taken.
I
j Hearin; aa,^ "~s,d at lon31 P.M.
I
.J E
a * R
t
i
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1413
September 4, 1979
Identity and Location: Z-1413_
This is the petition of Mr. John Stout requesting annexation and Agri-
cultural (A) zr.iing classification on a 1.58 acre tract located south `i
of University Drive near the intersection of Highway 380 and Cindy
Lane. The property begins 240' south of University Drive along the
City limit line and measures 23n' x 3001.
Recommendation. 5
The petitioner is proposing the construction of a church on this site 4
and on the abutting property north of the tract which is already
within the city limits and zoned Agricultural (A). The Comprehensive ;
Plen indicates this area for single family use, but the Zoning Ordi
narce permits construction of churches in all districts. g
{ i
Ranch Estates is located north of this tract across Highway 380 and
the abutting property immediately to the east, west$ and south of the
parcel is undeveloped.
The site can be served with water from the existing line along University
Drive; however, a se tic tank will need to be installed as there is no
sewer service available at this time.
Annexation of this site benefits the petitioner because he will be able
to receive city services, and the city will benefit because the building
constructed will be developed according to city standards. The Agri-
cultural (A) zoning requested is the classification that nearly all
the property in the area has, and it is felt that this is most appro-
priate for this largely undeveloped area.
i
Of notices sent to property owners for the Planning Commission hearing,
one was returned in favor and none in opposition. No one spoke in
opposition to this request at the Planning Commission hearing.
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended the City
Council approve zoning petition Z-1413.
.Y~ •d y+ Iwi' r r~l '1 , ~ Ti c1 •Q',y '1, S'~ ~Y ~,ir
!1!
(AD
1 YU~~N ~
K S td ' ~ Il It,
4' + ~r ' . ' ry lr b ~Vb1, 77
{ .Ii vasoIP
s. a
F, 4
14
~ l
l t{
r VlY 1, •N~71' l~ I~r~i,F9 ! r ,1`` r/,
( 1 ,..r., t?'- 1•-'a. `1 38Q'..
{ ~ r ~`T +44e••f•r* r riy+w ) a +ru ~,«.,1!►YI
t ~
r ~ jl`'r f ` w
i ► , . HIV +i I, :Low L . r t. •.~f ,
.
z lot
iG~1 ♦ +I. 7r}yhatr~ r! '.k~~,{ twoo
r- rc r. ,t'." . ♦p ITY.: ,arm
.
r + ~ '411 w. , ~
ION v
t r a L! orl
,yw+ t l i~ asp
. 1 ..r t F_ t ~ t~ ' 1 • .
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
Z-1413
Three (3) Propert,t Owners Notified
IN FAVOR it' OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Terry Carlton None None
Route 1. Box 439
Denton, TX 76201
r
I
{
r I
i
i
I •
i
REPLY FUR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Case No. 7-1413
fie l Vi_t ,C'! J , S5.'r
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council, If you desire to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
c
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects yo.r rights to attend the putiic hear-
ing and we encourage all interesteO. parties to attend and comment if
they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice {
return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve% it.
I
,
If you have que:,tiens pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
REPLY
(Xf) I am in favor of this zoning request.
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request.
( ) I nm undecided about this zoning request. }
My comments are as follows: _
Signature !
Address
Phone o~ w
j
i
{
r
1
- Z-1413 Three (3) Property Owners
rh ntn ,
221E Bolivar;Denton TX 76201
/6 ' Terry Joe Carlton, et ux
Route 1, Box 439; Dente;;, iy 76201
n John Davis
Route 1, Box 293; Crnton, 1'x 76201
i
i
- a
i
~ j
1
V A
CINDY LAW 1
r r~
u ~
r
o
aim'
a a
m ~o
z
-4 1
9 •
i
I N Y N f
N
I 4 a
Ilk i
. 1
4N
..,....,,.slow MwrvT~NarHAkea'lnirli~tN.4.%
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
August 15, 1979
The regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was held
August 15, 1979, at 5 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESL,IT: Marilyn Gilchrist, Robert LaForte, Linnie McAdams, Don Pyan,
Bill Brady, and Richard Taliaferro. Staff members: John Lavretta, Charlie
Watkins, Rick Svehla, and Secretary.
ABSENT: Andy Sidor
1. Approve the minutes of the August 1, 1979 meeting.
Motion made by Ryan and seconded by LaForte to approve the minutes
as written. Motion carr4'1 unanimously. (Brady not present at this
time)
II. Public Hearings: J
j A. Z-1412. This is the petition of Mr. Grant Jacobson requesting
a change in zoning from Single Family (SF-7) and Planned Develop-
ment (PD) for zero lot line residential use to Multi Family OF-1)
classification on a five acre tract. This property begins 404`
north of proposed Windsor Drive and 450' west of Stuart Road.
4
Jacobson, representing Universal Development Corporation who
owns thiF, tract of land and much o° the surrounding acreage,
stated tme desire to develop semi-luxury apartment units to be
leased and later sold as condominiums. The units will be one
and two bedroom with the unit density not to exceed the maximum
allowed.
3 No one spoke in opposition.
John Lavretta stated that of two notices sent to property owners,
none were returned either in favor or in opposition to the request.
He recommended denial of the petition.
Commissioner LaForte expressed concern with possible traffic con-
gestion in this area near the school, Nesulting from multi family
development.
(Commissioner Brady arrived at this time.)
Jacobson offered no rebuttal to the concerns of the Planning
staff. However, he stated his willingness to consider modifying
the petition for Multi Family Restricted (MF-R).
Commissioner McAdams felt this request would be detrimental to
the surrounding single family residences by providing no transi-
tion between them and the proposed multi family development.
Motion made by Gilchrist and seconded by Ryan to deny Z-1412. Motion
carried with five in favor of denial. Brady abstaineu.
B. Z-1413. This is the petition of Mr. John Stout requesting annaxa»
tion and Agricultural (A) zoning classification on 1.58 acres
located on the south side of University Drive near the intersec-
tion of U. S. 3£0 and Cindy Lane. The tract begins 240' south
of University and mer.sures 230' x 3001.
Mr. Stout, pastor of Bethel Temple Church, stated that the church
recently purchased this acreage for church construction, and
annexation of the tract would allow them to tie into city utility
services when available.
No one spoke in apposition.
John lavretta stated that of three notices sent to property owners,
one was returned in favor of the request and none in opposition.
He recommended approval of this request.
Motion made by Brady and seconded by Taliaferro to approve 2-1413.
Motion carried unanimously.
Cb Z-1414, This is the petition of Mr. Robert Cobb requesting a
change in zoning fraro Single Family (SF-1) to Neighborhood Service
(NS) classification. The property is located at 1021 Cleveland
Street.
Mr, Cobb spoke in favor of the request stlting his intention to I
refurbish the existing church structure fcr use as a recording j
studio. Such a studio would provide a unique and much needed
service to Denton. The existing structure would be remodeled
in order to provide a quality sound studio, as well as to enhance
tho area without causing anyy intrusion into the existing resi-
dential character. Plans illustrating the proposed remodeling
were shown to the Commission and explanation of the acolastics
to be included. Mr. Cobb stated Iis willingness to comply with
all city regulations. Very little traffic would be generated
I from this specialized use and adequate parking can be provided,
No one spoke in opposition.
A resident from the area asked how the sound could be controlled.
Mr. Cobb explained briefly.
John lavretta stated that of 22 notices sent to property owners
within 200 feet of the area, two war,. returned in favor of the
request and Seven in opposition. He recommended denial of the
petition.
Mr. Cobb offered no r<tal to the concerns of the Planning
Commission, but stated his willinggness to consider changing
his request to Office (0) classification.
I
3
i
I
Commissioner LaForte asked John Lavretta if the City would be
more su;,portive of Office (0) zoning than Neighborhood Service (NS).
John responded that Office (0) zoning in this area would be a
less drastic change from the residential character and more pre-
ferable; however, the staff's concern with the intrusion into
the residential character of the area from such rezoning would
i remain unchanged.
` Commissioner McAdams felt that chatioing the request from Neiggh-
borhood Service (NS) to Office (0) classification at this point '
would be misleading to the citizens of the area. She also felt
it to be detrimental to the neigh L, hood if Neighborhood Service
(15) zoning was allowed, especially since various types of retail
uses are permitted under this zoning classification besides a
sound studio.
Motion made by Brady and seconded by Taliaferro to deny z-1414. Motion
carried unanimously.
111. Considerations:
A. Consider the final plat of Oakhill Addition.
i
This item was not ready for Commission action at this time.
B. Consider the final plat of R. F. Hare Addition,
Motion made by LaForte and seconded by Brady to approve the final
plat of the R. F. Hare Addition. Motion carried unanimously,
C, Consider the final plat of The Village, Phase III.
Motion made by Brady and seconded by McAdam: to approve the final
plat of The Village, Phase 111. Motion carried unanimously.
0. Consider the final plat of the R. E. Ford Addition, y
Motion made by Taliaferro and seconded by McAdams to approve the
final plat of the R. E, Ford Addition. Motion carried unanimously,
E. Consider the final plat of Heritage Oak,.
} Motion made by Taliaferro and seconded by Ryan to approve the final '
plat of Heritage Oaks. Motion carried unanimously.
F, Consider the final plat of Goldin Triangle Industrial.
In discussion of this plat, a question was raised about the
developer's responsibility for paving 17' of the adjoining street
(Mayhill). There was a discrepancy as to whether this street is
considered a city or a countyy road, thus there was a discrepancy
about who would be responsib]0 for maintenance of the road, A
partsothefcity lIllimiRtoladiInesrunsoutsdownide
centermofsthenroad,so~*a
i
i
4
Director of Public Works Rick Svehla stated that the road in
question is not paved to city specifications at the present time
and if the developer does pave and dedicate the 111, the city
will pave the rest and be responsible fcr its maintenance despite
the location of the city limit line.
Mike Ramos, representing the property owner of the area being
platted, questioned whether the road was actually an unimproved
road. ;
LaForte moved to table further consideration of this plat until more
information about the jurisdiction of the portion of Mayhill in
question could be obtained from the City Attorney. Gilchrist seconded
the motion and it carried unanimously.,
*r
f,
G. Consider the final plat of Alton Davis Addition.
Motion made by LaForte and seconded by McAdams to approve the final
plat of the Alton Davis Addition with the stipulation that when water fl
and sewer service becomes available to the site, the owner be require. i
to connect onto these facilities. Motion carried unanimously. {
H. Receive report on land use issues in northeast Denton.
John Lavretta reported that Jesse Coffey, a developer, had re-
quested that the City Council allow extension of water and sewer
service to his property in northeast Denton. The City Council
tabled his request for further information and decided to study
annexation of a large area in north Denton. Lavretta also re-
l ported that Mr. Floyd McDaniel, representing a number of property
owners in northeast Denton, had appeared before the Council
encouraging them to give careful consideration to any zoning and
development requests in this area in order to preserve its single
family character. '
Emergency Item;
1. Consider disposit:on of surplus city property on the northeast
{ corner of Hickory Street and Avenue E.
John Lavretta reported that the City Council requested that two
parcels of land--one at the southeast corner of Oak and Avenue E a`
and one at the northeast corner of Hickory and Avenue E--which
had originally been considered for disposition separately, be
considered together. He gave a report on the Park Director's
opinion concerning the use of the property for a park,
Motion made by Taliaferro and seconded by LaForte to dispose of both
parcels of property. Motion carried unanimously.
Mike Ramos returned to the planning Commission meeting at this point, re-
questing the Commission to reconsider their original motion to table
consideration of the Golden Triangle industrial plat. He felt the`Com-
mission could act on the final plat making the question of his responsibility
for paving 17' of Mayhill conditional.
S1
Brady mn:ad that this item be reconsidered at this time. Gilchrist seconded
the wotion and it carried unanimously.
Brady moved that the final plat of Golden Triangle Industrial be approved,
Motion died from lack of a second,
La Forte m% ed that the final plat of Golden Triangle industrial be approved
and that the City Council be informed that this approval is giver. with
reservations concerning the developer's responsibility
for
17' of paving
on Mayhill Road, adjoining this property. Gilchrist seconded the mo.
The motion carried with four--LaPorte, Gilchrist, Brady, and Taliaferro--
in favor and two--McAdams and Ryan.-in opposition.
The meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission 'adjourned at 7.00 p,m.
i
I
IE t.
{ .
E 1 , rt it
5
.t
Rf
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bill Angelo, Administrative Assistant
DATE: August 30, 1979
SUBJECT: Agenda item #2A - Public Hearing on the 1979-80
Operating Budget
This item was placed on the Agenda at the request of the Finance
Director, bill McNary, and will involve citizen input from the J
general public. 1
We have placed copies of the proposed budget in the Library, the
City Secretary's Office and the City Manager's Office for public
scrutiny. In addition, the budget has been distributed to the
members of the Council an& to the news media. Therefore, no
backup material will be provided for this item.
E
BiI-L l
ge o
BAtjm
4!,
i
+AJa ~f F'dcKLaM#V.Kt,wr+w.i.aw:sxaYwmra<r
wr
I
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
III T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
F FROM: Bill Angelo, Administrative Assistant
DATE: August 30, 1979
E SUBJECT: Agenda Item #3 - Agency Reports
This item was placed on the Agenda at the request of Bill McNary,
Director of Finance, and will consist of a formal request for
funds from these agencies receiving financial contributions from
the City.
i
I have attempted to provide some financial information on each
of these agencies for the Council's information. At the present
time, I have been unable to locate any financial statements or
regnest for funds from the Information and Referral Service, if
this information should become available, it will be hand-delivered
prior to the September 4, 1979 Council meeting.
l
j
ig
BA:3m
j
i
it
R'.
1r
I
f RSVP Chibm Trail Retired Seniorlloiunteer Program-Serving Denton County
II
July 7, 1979
Mr. Chris Far City Mager
City of Dantdn
215 East xir~y street
Denton, 76201
Dear Mr. Hartung,
The Retied Senior Volunteer Progt•tun requests your continued support of its program,
A part of ACICN, RSVP is partly funded by Congress.
requires match:4s fords. We are mi~Y In 0z gmt Op, eration renewable yearly,
$162 364 in mate mw sixth year of of op which req e
will hang funda. If the city of Denton would contribute $3,a00.00 in 19800
request rcamining fords from other sou. ces.
Enclosed is a copy of our budget and a brochure.
We are wet appreciative of
of our need in 1980. 5cur' support in the pa 4, and for your consideration
Sincerely,
Carol Riddlesperger 0 _
Director
! CR/ro
{ E
Copies sent to dity codraflpereons.
I~t~a LkU
JUL 11',979
CITY OF DEMON
MAIWICER'S OFFICE
Second Ploot Coutthowe on the Square Denton, Tems 78201 817.3003.15508
a
b
lAw~
4
1
_ r
PARE III SECTION B
1. VOLUNT[ER WMOAT iNPEMSEI vl;~, A. GA
ANEEI ERSONNIL EXPI ill pl II x rl Pollard nl~}
AAnusl Omni o, Total Pumas
Nw4egioest
Tale salary ►:dRl Cat AO*Mwd nowoN ~`f v`
' Yr
•.SVP Director 112,672 " 100 !12,672 i129672 ! 1,,
SVP Secretary/Bookkeepe 6,678 100 6,678 2,268 4,410 i'
SVP 4/5 Coordinator 8,064 80 f 6 427 f 6,427
+ TOTAI PfRSONNfI [X►ENSfI ! 27,414
%
+ 1. FAWGE
I C. 111 GRANTEE STAFF LOCAL TRAVEL
C. 171 GRANTEE STAFF LONG DISTAA TRAVEL ' •`I
EQUIPMENT I
4. !WPLIES
i F, CONTRAOTUAI SIRVICI
O.OTHER: nsurance
w NON
Mndq t
Ewn IV1. 2ulo
TOTAL VOLUNTEER SUPPORT IXPEN►ES 37, 121 2 0b 11yr.~ 5
g# ZI
. f. VQlUN1tIAEXPENSEI , ;j~..y,
A, PERSONNEL EXPENSE!
ar SEI rida
LIWIA Alowlgq
End of fk I" AlkMnq
j food,nd L Allewonq 1
i f, PAINGI SINUITS
FICA
U+filprAN , .
~ I lnwrolXN f
,
C. TRAVEL
D, tOUIPAIENT
r 1. fUPflflf
F, CONTAACTVAL fiAVl E
O. OTHER
n a o
TOTAL VOLMTIfA IX►1NSIS 4,14 4 1 5 4Q
TOTAL OIRICT CWS, !AV I a S)
I _ 41,265 24,961 16i364
TOTAL INOIAICT COITh Mae OW 41 1 j
TOTAL DaT[ t• 1.1y
41j265 24 P 90'1 16064
IOf% 60x 4ox
I. VOLUNT/fA~ IfA1~PIG}if:
j k viw o * f1Y1111if & of nwnNan: 1n rr._ 7 , 3 6 7M OMJ}Li iS7~ i~ av-1TS IN 11
! Bwfryf of VduMOM:
7/77) PI/I se
!Ai osrt k**m of M Aron w o1wAIN W ON OW N oWJ
j ~
i
SPAN CORRTNOUSE N T S DARE, DENTON, TEXAS 76201 - 817/387-4341
Scrvkes Program for Aping Needs 1n Denton County
July 12s 1974
,
Mr, Chris Har ng
City Manager j
City of De on
Denton, T as 76201
I
Dear Mr. liartungt
It has come to our attention that the budget for the City
of Denton for 1980 is presently being prepared. SONN would like
to request a contribution of $13,500 toward its transportation }
service to the elderly.
t
I would be very happy to come before the City Council to
answer any questions any council members might have concerning
SPAN service or our 1990 budget, 'Please let me know if you would
like me to do this, E
y
Wa very much appreciate the support the City of Denton has j
given us in assistinq our elderly citizens with transportation, t
They are very appreciative of this needed service,
l I s
Thank you for all of your heio, i
~~~;dially, ~ I
Roberta Donebach
Director i
f
I
{ RD~e1
•
i
1
I
,
JUL 13 1979
CITY OF DENTON
i MANARR S O DICE
.La
DENTON CULTURAL CONFEDERATION
2nd Fllor, Courthouse on the Square
Denton, Texas 76201
August 17, 1979
Mayor Sill Nash
City ^f Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
AMIMIONt City Manager and Director of Finance
Dear Mayor Nashi
The Denton Cultural Confederation received revenuo from the 1% Lalor
Hotel/Motel Room Occupancy tax by check fran the City of Denton on August
15, 1979 in the amount of $5,925.30. This represented feuds received for
the Second Quarter of 1979. A!.& sums collected Oass 11 administration
costs for the City), were deposited in the Denton Cultural Confederation
account at the First State Bank in Denton.
i
Please find attached a fimwial statenent reflecting the wg*rKlitures
of the Denton Cultural Confederation, the Denton County Historical 0andasion
and the Greater Denton Arta Council. As you will recall,, the 11 Lalor Funds 1.
are oplit or. a 601 to GDAr and 01 to DCW ration. The fiwAl year for the
Greater Denton Arts Council runs from July let to Jura 30th ~.)hile the Denton
p County Historical 0onmission functions on a J&Nuary 111. to Deowk*r 31st fiscal
yeer.
Our financial rooords are always available for inspection and we will
j be most happy to provide any additional Information that We
are most appreciative of the a'ippnu t of the City of Denton to the projects
4 j of the Denton Cultural Confederation.
Sincerely,
Ymm A. Jenkins! President r 1
Rd art B. Neale, Jr., Tress
w.«i3.ula'ucPS+Mutaa4iF8.A'A~huv. .wu u
i
1
DF1V'iCt4 CUMMAG CONFEDERATIM
Q[]AEQF.ItLY RED'
APRUr.MY aj7 ----1979
a
EXPE HDrIUIM :
2nd 4:arter Year to Date '
Greater Denton Arts Council (608) S 3555.18 $ 6969.08
Denton Ob. Historical CmTnisnion (408) $ 2370.12 $ 4579.38
S 5925.30 $ 11448.46
Balance (8-16-79) S 47.96 $ 47.96
i
r
r
f
t
i
~i.AT.~TS.~~/~Jl~ie4.h'wcMNsa.• r~..r....
{
1.
AuCust 201 1979
Mr-, Dill :lash, M ,-170r
1 City of Denton
21j t. McKinnej St.
Denton, To,-,as 76201
ATmE,, m-01da City i-lanager and Director of Finance
Dear Hayor 'lash:
M
The Greater Denton Arts Council received its fifth
portion of the I:otel-7otel occupancy tax fron the
Denton Cultural Confederation A Aw-ust 20, 1.979.
Tilo total of .33545,18 represents 60,! of the 1, of
funds collected April through June 1979• This amount
has been depo3ited in the Greater Denton lxts Council
Special Account, frith tae first State Ban!: of Denton.
Enclosed is i financial staZe..ent shoring e%penditures
Xpril thmigh June 1979 and t1.o fiscal year to date.
the Special Account operates undar a Jul,! 1 - Jane 30
fiscal year to coincide •iith the Gres. er Denton Arts
Council budgat and audit year.
3espicC 1iil7 al,:aiacad,
D'. ll a,lc~ Jr. /
~,aasurer
Jrac tar De :r.on ",ts :uuncil
nclortzrs
w
i
i
i
QUAR 1IL! Rz'?ORi
April th:•our;h Sune, 1979
Ma
BUDGE APR-M.13 179 - TO DATE
Salaries 9,600.00 -0- 11000.00
Office Space 11200.00 -0- -0-
Ofrice Z:mense
supplies, phone
postage, 11209.00 135410 366.42
Movin expense -0- -0- 20.)100
Insurance -0- 8.00 65.00
i
I
Dues and
Subscriptions -0- 65.00 65.00
Arts Yes tival
Cash awards, costs -C- 4Cv±.83 1?065.U3
Arts Yestival
awakds reeaption -0- 16').00 107.00
lose,-va :kinds 3o-'00,00
TOTAL 15,6c0.00 1490.93 29329.2 5
i
i
i
tt Denton County Historical Commission
t courthouse on the Square, 2nd Floor
Denton, Texas 76201
Phone: 8171588.1487
August 17, 1979
Mayor Bill Nash
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
ATTUMCN: City Manager and Director of Finance
3
Dear Mayor Nash:
The Denton County Historical Oonmission received the fifth 18 Ialor
Hote'A**el !loco C=pancy tax check from the CitY of Denton on August 15,
1979. A total of $2370.12, (40% to DCW), the sum collected from April
through June of 19791 (less It administration costs for the City), was
deposited in the Denton County Historical Omdssion Special Account at
the First Stets Bank in Denton.
Please find attached a fin&wJ91 statemmt reflectiveg the Ckmnission's
expenditures from the first quarter receipts of 1979 and thb fiscal year to
date. The Ommission is under a January lst to December. 31st fiscal year.
Please note that these expenses are based on the FY-1979 Budget submitted
in CJl2r last quarterly report.
Our records are open at all times for inspection and we will be happy
to provide any additional infoamaticn that you request. We hope that the
City Council and citizens of Denton are pleased with the naT projects of
the interest and that are being financed by the Ielor funds. We appreciate
support that the 0ounoil has in our projects and the
heritage of Denton County.
Sii'icerelY,
l/
A. Jenkins
Chainran s
j
Attachnen s
a a,wx»x,~w~*w...rw.,,.....o ..w..,
t4
1r
J v ~
Denton County Historical Commission
Courthouse on the Squus, 2nd Flo&
" Denton, Texas 79201
Photo; 817/56&1481
wrr +n.Y . APRIL-xw-j NE of 1979
1tFAR TO [1ATE
MUSELMs AUDGM MAY-%RM-179
Saluy-nmeum Director $ 4329.00 $ 1083.99 $ 1083.99
Display and Wlibits $ 1200.00 $ 2.10 $ 2.10
pquiptmt and Supplies $ 500.00 $ 90.04 $ 90.04
Memberships in Mrseue o-
professional Associations $ 200.00 $ -0-
mum= Gift Shop $ 350.00 $ 174.39 $ 174.39
OAR floilection $ 150.00 $ 150.00 $ 150.00
- 150032
52
'
6729. 00
VISUAL AIDS AMID AIY: !n
Slide presentation for Mummme $ 53.37 $ 53.37
schools, lecturesr Photographs
for display and Archives $ 600.00 _
$ 600.00 $ 53.37 $ 53.37
PUBtZMCNS s
For imwdiate publication of bro-
chores artd reserve toward
future publications $ 125000 $ 177.64 $ 177.b4
$ 1250.00 S 177.64 $ 177.64
1 am TDrppl,S $ 8579.00 $ 1731.53 $ 1731.53
~J
t
i
.rrwrs...R'N~%'a1d1iM1SlY":~'ilWd4ilad.nww.r«.s:..-,~«••~._
-9$93
r -111382
CONVENTIONIVISITORS BUREAU
!/~u DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
P.O. ORAWER P 414 PARK WAY OENTON, TEXAS 76201
August 15, 1979
t
Bi I I Nash, Mayor
4 City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
A 1
Fi ATTENTION: City Manager and Director of Finance
Door Mayor Nash:
The Denton Chamber of Commerce received the fourteenth 3% motel occupancy y
tax check from the City of Denton on August 15, 1979. A total of $17,775.91, the A
sum collected from April through June, 1979, (less 1% administration costs for the City),
was deposited in the Conventiori/Visitors Bureau checking account at First Denton
E National Bank.
s
Plaose find enclosed a financial statement reflecting Conventiori/Visitom Bureau
expenditures for April through June, 1979, and the fiscal year. As you will recall,
the Bureau is under on April - March fiscal year to coincide with the Choisber of r
Commerce budget and audit.
As always, we will provide any additional Information or detaiis upon request. 2
i
Respectfully yours,
Frank A. Atkins, Jr Darrell W. Woolwine t
Executive Vice President Director e
Denton Chamber of Commerce Conventior/Visitorx Bureau
DW:FA:rsl
enclosure
j
cc: Chris Hartung, City Manager
Bill Mc Nary, City Finance Director
i '
• i
• t~ ~E i
I
I
F i
CONVENTION/VISITORS BUREAU
Quarterly Report
April-June, 1979
q, YEAR
BUDGET AP-JN, 79 TO DATE
Salaries - Director, staff 21,300.00 5,158.32 5,158.32
f Car Allowance 600,00 150.00 150.00
Taxes 1,306.00 316.20 316.20
Hospitalization 700.00 174.96 174.96
Management & Supervision 5,800.00 1,449.99 1,449.99 s
Training/Travel 10000.00 684,42 684.42
Office Supplies 550.00 112.50 112.50 ¢
Telephone 275.00 6$,73 68.73
Telephone/Recorder 610.00 332.22 332.22
Office Space 20400.00 600.00 600.00
Dues & Subscriptions 600.00 232.25 232.25 {
1 Audit 225.00 56.25 56.25
Advertising 26,000.CO 3,257.30 31257.30
I Solicitation 90620.00 100292,21 109292,21 {
k Conv.ntion Services 2tQ000 345.82 345.82
TOTAL 72,98:00 23,231•.17 23,231.17
1
f
do
P
L
f
. l
A~~""°_°" 8!713@2.9699
rf \ CONVENTION/VISITORS BUREAU .
DENTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
P.O.DftAWE'RP 414 PARKWAY DENTON, TEXAS 76201
"J\
May 16, 1979 ,
Bill Nash, Mayor
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Dcnton, Texas 76201
s
ATTENTION: City Manager and Director of Finance
Door Mayor Nash:
The Denton Chamber of Commence received the thirteenth 3% motel occuponey
tax check from the City of Denton on May 15, 1979. A total of $ 16,569.48, the sum
collected from January through March, 1979, (less 1% administration costs for the City),
was deposited in the Corr~entiorVV!sltors Bureau checking account at First Denton
National Bank.
.I
f Please find enclosed a financial statement reflecting Convention/Visitors Bureau
expenditures for January through March, 1979, and the fiscal year. As you will re-
call, the Bureau is under an April - March fiscal year to coincide with the Chamber Y
f of Commerce budget and audit.
{ As always, we will provide any additional information or details upon request.
{ 1 Respectfully yours,
Frran A Atkins, Jr. Darrell W. Woolwlne
Executive Vice President Director
Denton Chamber of Commerce Convention/Visitors Bureau
DW;FA;rl a
enclosures i
cc: Chris Hartung, City Manager
i Bill M-Nory, City Finance Director E
I
• ,I
~ f -.II t
two-'--
so
mom]
i
h `
i
. CONVENTION/VISITORS BUREAU
Quarterly Report
January/March, 1979
r ,
YEAR
BUDGET .)AN MAR 79 " TO'DATE
yr
Salaries (Director, Staff) 17,000.00 4,810.98 15,629.59
Car Allowance 480.00 720.00 426.00
Taxes-Unemployment 10000.00 294.93 949.69
Hospitalization 700.00 175.03 700.00
Management A Supervision 5,800.00 19450.03 50800.00
Seminars 3 Training 800.00 650.06 1,250.00
1 Office supplies 450.00 112.50 468.37
Telephone/Telegraph 325.00 81.28 325.00
Office Space 2,400.00 600.00 2,400.00
Dues d Subscriptions 200.00 502.50 636,50
Audit 225.00 56.25 225.00
Advertising 100000.00 79710.37 21,926.20
Solicitation 9,620.00 1,847.66 2,404.46 £
" ,,ention Services 2,000.00 1,546.44 21008,11
Moving Expense -0- -0- " ''683,34 7
TOTAL 51,000.00 190958,14 556826.26
j {
1
db
f
j
l
. j
f
I
CITY OF DENTON
f MEMORANDUM {
I ~
x
s
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bill Angelo, Administrative Assistant '
DATE: August 30, 1979
SUBJECT: Agenda Item 04 - Parking on the Square
This item was laced on the
p Agenda b Mayor Bill Nash at the
request of concerned citizens. At the ppre,ent time, the Staff
is unaware of the particular request; tb2refore, no backup
material will be provided for this item. Members of the Staff
will be on hand to respond to my inquiries these citizens might
have.
f a
0
BA:jm ;
i
i
I
l
,
t
Proposed
Airport Agreement
as recommended by
Airport Advisory Board and
Aerosmith Denton Corporation
s
Councilman's Marked Copy
Notes:
1. The general format, by agreement, follows the 1975 contract.
2. The shaded areas represent departures from the 1975 contract
which are intended
{a) to incorporate the "14 points* agreed to and
b remedy what are perceived to be areas of ambiguity in
the 1975 contract.
3. Changes in section numbers are caused by the deletion of entire
section IV of the 19775 contract since it is no longer applicable.
4. A reservation in the metes and bounds description of the leased
property in the 1975 contract has been deleted as it is no
longer applicable.
4
f
- J
! 1
I
}
I
THE STATE Of TEXAS a
COUNTY OF OENTON AIRPORT AOREENENT
This Agreement, made sod entered Intl At Denton, Toxas, this
j the day of A. D. 1g 1g, by eae between the city of
Denton. Texas, a Municipal Corporation, of the County of Denton,
I i
State of Texas, hereinafter for Convenience sometimes styled
i
"C1 and Aerosmith Denton Corporation, a Texas Corporation,
j hereinafter for Convenience sosretlmes 111~1e4 a'Aere~ s~tho~ with
II}
reference to the Denton Municipal Airport, herotnafter for
convenience sometimes styled •Airport";
WITNESSEThs
i The parties hereto for and in consideration of the rents, 1
I Commissions, covenants and agreements contained herein mutually
j I agree As follows:
l s '
f PREMISES
City does hereby demise and tot unto Aeroseritn, and Asrosmith E
does hereby hire and take from the City, certain premises And
facilities, rights, licenses, and privileges Wand In connection
with the property and impraveeents of City specified as said
Airport, as more pArticularly hereinafter set forth%
A. OSE OF AIRPoXTa
I the use, to common with others Authorized to to do, of
I ! said airport And all appurtenances, facilities, improvements,
I equipment and services which have team or may hereaftor be
provided thoreat, such use without ilaiting the generality hereof,
J) to include the following rights, Ileenses, And prNi ligasi
I The operation of a transportation systom by aircraft, the
` repairing, maintaining, conditioning, servicing, parking or
F
f storage of aircraft or other equipments the training of personnel
I and the tasting of aircraft and other equipment= the sale,
I
fxw.
a: ~.w a
disposal or exchange of aircraft, engines, ACCeeseries, and
related equipment; the servicing by Aarosmith or others of
aircraft and other equipment, including the right to instelt and
maintain On said airport adequate storage facilities, and
appurtenances, Including right of way necessary therefort the
landirg, taking off, parking, loading, and umloadlnq of aircraft
and other equipmentl the right to load and unload persons,
property and nail at said airport, by such Miami is Aarosmith may
desire, with the right to designate the carriers who shall 4
i transport Aerdsmfth's passengers and their baggage to and from the ?
# airport, and, also, the further right to designate the carriers '
who shall transport Aerosmith's airborne freight, it any, t;r and
from the said airport; the right to install and operate
'I
advertising signs, the general type and detign of such signs to be
j ( relsonabla and approprtatel the right, but not the duty or
I
I obligation, to install, Maintain and operate radio,
coawuoleations, meteorological and aortal navigation%, and such
other similar equfpsent and facilities to, on or about the
f premises herein tolsad, as may he necessary or convenient for
131 Aerosmith's oparetiomsl the conduct of any other business or
i operations reaiagabty,_necoliary to tha proper, necessary and
appropriate conduct and Operation by Aardidlith of its bufioess,
b, SPACE IN ADNIAISSRATIDN 11 lD N6t
Subleet to Citv's eight of reelotnr■ as kereinaftar !
arovided. City affords to Airosmith the sole use of sufficient
i space to the Administration Building now located an said airport,
but In no event to exceed fifty (50><) percent of the whole aree ,
E thereof, for such use is Aeraietth may desire to make thereof,
compatible with the nature and intent of these preaentsl the use,
to common with others, of all public spade in the Administration
j Suildtng,
C. PARK DO SPACE:
i The use by Aeraimith, Its employaes, customers, suppliers
FF And other licensees, or invitees, without charge, of in adequate
3
r
` PAIIE 2
I
I
~ I
designated vekicular parking space located ss near 41 possible t
the Administration Building,
D. LEASED GR0l1ND SPAM
r
The sole use of that certain ground space, together with
Alt Improvements now located thereon and which may hereafter be
j added thereto, tying and befog situated an said airport, for Such
i uses as Aerasmith may desire to make, thereof, compatible wlth the
j Purposes and intent harlot, the Same being more parts ?
forth and described as followst cularly set
6EG1MM1M6 at a point In the north propert line of a
tract of 14G4 out of the Thomas To~
Abstract No. 1265 and We, Neill Survoy, AbstractvNo,
570 Oenton County, Texas, said tractt being in the
name of.-P. F, green led described 1n Yolum! 121, i
1 Page 163 of the Died Records of Denton County, i
Texas. Sold paint being the northwest earner of
Road ISISt and also being 1n the south lint of F.M.
I t
THEItC
F Mast with the south line of F.M. Road J5tS a
1 distance of 3S0 feet to A Paint for A corners
THENCE north a distance of Joao feat to a point for
a Cornlrt
oroa~l wet a distance of 630 feet to a point for a
! I) T4[AC9 tooth a dfstanea of 160o het to a point for
e cornett
THENC[ east. a distanceof J164 feel, voxt or all,
to a pelmet fei a carhop, said point befog' the east
westerly Southwest Corner of the said Breen TreCtt
1 ` I THENCE northerly with the west tfoe of said Green
Tract a distance of 600 root to the plate of
beginning.
I E. RIGHT OF ACCE S thgA 3 AND EGA s
The full and uorettrictod access and ingress to and
egress from tha pronlset far 411 PurPaseS contemptatod by this
agreement.
F. A A05 lTn AGREE[
I
111 TO fnddmnlfy the City against such tosses in
tanneetlon with Aerosmithol operations hereunder as can be
I
funded from ASrosmith's purchase of a standard liability
PAGE 3
insurance policy to in amount not lest then 11100,000 for each
person; $300,000 for each occurrence, and $100,000 for Property
damage;
} (2) To Comply With All current and future laws and
ordinances end all regulations of federal, state, county or
city airport authorities and/or agencies, and pay all taxes,
and the cost of llconses and permits necessary for its
operations, hereunder;
(3) To keep adequate records of income and expense and
7 make sueh records reasonably available, upon request, to the
r
i ) Director of finance, City of Oenton, Texass
i (4) To conduct its business and sanagement to a
courteous and efficient manner; r
(S) To provide service on a 00n•diseriminstory basis;
at overnight g other
transientaircraft ore Ai 1:4-down
remaining to
airport for
b) y
twenty-four (24) hours or 1411;
i (T) To maintain normal and customary airport services
during daylight hours, and man the unicorn apparatus whenever
reasonably necessary.
I (B) To provide Janitorial sirviee to the Airport
Administration Building;
(91 To be responsible for aowlne and dlsoosttlon of
i
weeds. areas and other vaaetatlen as we 11 ae tha _ella~see ,,w
1
1n _ia►sed by Clev _ta
maintenance within those areas her
9
Atrosmith ts% the some be heroin soociffeelly designated -is
the resod of"" 1
(10) To operate a flight school and have at least one
suitable afrplane for training and rental purpoeee;
(11) To operate and maintain a new aircraft dealership j
or lucdealership or distributorship on this atrpdrt;
(12) To operate and maintain an a/c and a/c engine
repair ahoy, Including imployment'of in A b P license aircraft
resnanicl
7
?AGE ~ s
/V5
(13) To Mike Avg IIgo Ia either by tank truck, %tattonary
pump or other, suitable dispensing equipment approved by the
Fire Marshal at the City of Denton, those grades and octanes of
gatolIn* and other petroleum distillates norntly found at
similar airports, grid all storage tanks for gasoline and other
i ` avittion fuel$ sh+11 be placed underground in accordance with
the prov is lens of the Firs Code of the City of Denton for
r,nderground flammable liquid storage tanks.
r
F (14) To provide vending machines on premises for the
dispensing of refreshments, and to retain the revenue from such
devices.
~ ~ A. CITY AAPEESs_
(1) To provide and equip an Administration Building
} and provide an office therein for Aerosmith in sold
} I Administration luilding, and provide unicorn equipmentl
(2) To provide sole use of those certain h+neart shn►uL
is BUILDINGS number 1 2 2A S and n i
v l
I hereto end being on the property her N n 1 N ied_tn Aeresmith.
(1) To maintain all concrete end isphatt runways,
M
taxiways and auto and airplane parking areas on the entire
# airport, including the promises hereto leased or made available
i to M r0smith by virtue hereaft v
(a) Pay for all utilities for the equipment described
}
i in ttem 5 below and all utilities to the Administration
7
Building and water for maintaining the tree around the
{ Administration 5uildings
(5) To maintain tit runway, taxi, and area lights, and
beacons is will as to provide all security lightixq on t-hI.
airport If the City. dooms the latter nec/it+rv:
(6) To provide adequate insurance for the
Administration luildinq and all logged hangars, and to replica
a
i
?ALE S 1
1
y ~
_ ..~....++..w.rrii'iK+i6+4211R1Y~.i~NTi~M'W-`1a~"n
. 1111
I
i
r
i
I
i
or repair each In all cases of any loss compensated by
insurance, within a reasonable time.
i1.
TEAM.
aim
The primary of this Agreement shall be for -4 period 0
thirty (30) years, commencing an the data of executlon h roof
I and ending on the day immediately precleding the date hereof (a
the lime month of the year 1009, unless loaner terminated as
Atrein provided though City specifically acraes that skCuld
Aerossith, during said thirty {70) year primary torsm. Complete
construction of new fee 2rd1uPim9 aircraft related ficilltfet
of minimum value or three Hundred Thousand -($300,0001 Dollars
(1n 1979 dollars), City shell
front to Aerosmith the right to
e extend the term of this leate for an additional ten (10) ear
4
a ± period from the date of expiration of said primary ten
provided Aerbtmith shall In writing notify the city Manaear of
t:
the City of 0ontan, at the office of the city Manger of Its
S
Intent to exercise its right of oxtensian and Provided further
that such notice shall be received by the office of the Cl4v
t Ran+gor not less than sixty (60}d+ s prior to the expiration
y { of tho Prfm4ry term as provided herein. 1
I
RENTAL$ AND FEES
Atrosslth agrees to pay city, at the Municipal 94i)diof S
A Texas, a base cash rental of Eight thousand four
t
Hundred (Se,400.00) Doilar% per year, {
. payable In monthly
installments of Seven Nuodred (;700.00) Dollars each for each
n
fo+r this lease is in rffatt, subloct, however, to read lament
7f sueb ha IIe each rant aIthor
~awarda er darnrarde at
cad of !acn fire »tr aerial from the date herant on the baata
b aL_the Ora eertlen that the then current aflf eer'a Priee index
{ 01110 WOrt Worth, Texas Standard ,Metropolitan Statistical
Area, comdi}ed by the U. S. 0eoartment of Labor Aura r
Ltaar Statistics bears to the 1979 index ,high
PAGE S
RsLyt•
t
5
was (1967.100); to which possible read$ustment at the !f
and of five year period both C1ty and Aerosmlth ngw agree. f
In addition to -the above best rental as provided. Aerosmith
agrees to pay monthly the followings
A. Ten (1011 percent of all hangar rental of facilities in
1
Alice as of date hereof with the further agreement that
i
reinntaI on facilities herealtar eenstrurted by a■rne■1L>,
s shall be negotiated at tine of plan to0rotoI nt suck
r
i faciI I ties by City] and
6. Three (79) Cents per gallon an all aviation fuel sold
by~patmith other than that purchased and used by
or$~alth And/or its oars eoreorjtlIl~_lerasa~llh
i Corporation or ten (10x) percent e1 A.rpsmleh~.
I profit from the sale of aviation fuel- taxeludino purchases.
and use by Aerosolth and/or Aerosoith Corporation)
whichever 4ol shall be the Greatest. The parties heretp
agree that gross profit shall be the difference betwden the
Colt 0; fuel, Including taxas thereon, and its felling
1 f r r~c~. .
C. A sum equal to one•twalfth (1/19) of the annual test to
City of the insurance carried on the fifteen thousand
(1500001 square foot Win hangar and the ten (101_T•haAgar_s
i presently owned by City on the prooorerein, y'
IV.
o
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS y
Aerosmith shall be responsible for the Cleaning.
`G -
maintenance ind minor repairs of 411 buildings, structures and
premises owned by City which are an the oroperty being heroin
aped to Aerosmith including, unless the same b! H sapturad_
t
the Administration 9uildine. City shall ba rasaanslbla far Att
major repairs and the parties do now agree that major Noeirs
are defined is repairs regulrod on buildings, structures, And
1
fixtures havfng in upected life of one year or longer, My
P ;
i
?AGE 7
i
bYi
shall not be responsible for cle_anina, maintenanee_ ■elar ar
minor pairs an property awned by Aarosmith.
~ Y.
ACOITIONA! CONSTRUCTION
s A. Aerosmith may at its own Cost and expense, as the need
therefor shell arlse, erect or, install at a location to be
determined by both parties hereto, at laid airport, 1ny hangar
{ or hangars, buildings or structures, Including storage tanks,
or other equipment, above or underground rp ovlAed Aerna■Ith
t
shall first submit general ptans, cost elttma! s, and the
" I Proposed use of such facilities to city for, Approval prior to
implementattan. It being the intent of 1:1 8 City to grant
Agra moth the right to engage in any Avi lfon;alrpart-related
business on the leased property which it d Amroper and 6hich
in keeping with the terms and Conditions In this Agreement
cost` In
i
j City leases said premises to Aerossith for the purpose s
of being a general aviation operator and Aerosmith will not
sub-lease any portion of the premises without the Approval of
City nor will Aerosmith erect, install, or construct on said
~ r
premises or sub-14&14 any part Ioq_py_.gitdr pre~isN_. top rt
erection, installation or construction of any induttrial,
commercial or retail building, or any total, hotel, r4staureet,
l
private club or bar without the approval of City sno under the
terms and conditions, ineluing financial CantiderAtion to City,
agreed to between the parties. City shall not compete with
Aerosslth regarding lease of property for lndustrial,
commercial or retail purposas to potential lesse/t solicited by
Aerosmith. Aerolmith will notify City in writing of third p
Parties with which it Is negotiating.
C. If at any time during the exittenct of this lease, City 1
constructs additional facilities for ass of Aerasmith, the i
parties will negotiate Additional terms And conditions for laid E
facilities.
}
1
PAGE S i
.w•4&.., ..a: e:.xs♦ .r Ma.. n..
~q'+>Y...4 Fi1$4(N• .A"M~ll•A<~j~~1w•M i.waO.,Mw r.u~
WOO
ti
YI. /
RULES ANO AEGULATIONS 111
Aerosmith Covenants and agrees to observe And obey ell
reasonable rules and regulations which May from time to time
f during the tors thereof be promulgated and enrated by City or
other competent authority, provided the same lee consistent
with safety and does not confllct with the rules Of any federal
agency having jurisdiction thereover, Arid are not inconsistent
with the procedures prescribed ear Approved from time to time by +
the federal Aviation Agency or Civil Aeronautics Board for
4 ! Operations of Aeraimith's Aircraft at said airport. City
Covenants and agrees to formulate, adopt and enforce local
I rules and regulations At said Airport which will provide, among '
other things, that scheduled transport plants, whenever
conditions of safety will permit, will be given the right of
way over other aircraft and which regulations shall control tiro S
I general public and traffic so is not to interfere with the ¢
operationt.of Aerasmith.
tt ~
wit.
! City shall have no control whatsoever over the rates,
E fares, fees, or any charges whatsoever that Aeroseith may
prescribe for any of its services by air or land, to, from, i
t
E through, or at said airport,
Will.
{
i NEW CONSTRUCTION r
All property now situated upon the looted premises
heretofore constructed by Aerosmith and Al 1_ _orooerty hereafts
Constricted upon the premises by Aerotmith shall Ptmefa the i
a
property of Aerosmith subject to the following conditions:
A. Na property shall be removed-from the oremiies Without
the written Consent of City.
9
i 9. All property and improvements of rhativer, nature
F i
roeain1n0upcn the leased predicts coon the sxdiratidn of
this tease, includinp the extension thereof if the same be
i
DACE g
i
I
exercised, shalt automatically thereupon become the
property of City free of any and all encumbrance s
. /
C. Should this lease agreement be cancelled under the
terms hereto for any reason other than Aerosmith's default
in the payment of the Rentals and Fees as are provided
herein, then and In that event City shalt have the first
right and Aerasaith Corporation, the parent corporation of
t
Aerosmith heroin, shall have the second right to purchase
all buildings and structures constructed by Aerasmith at
its expense. the parties do now agree that the price at
which either party shalt have the right to purchase said
i buildings and structures shall be the Fair value..thereof it
time of the exercise of such right as determined by an
ind nt appraisal by a person or firm mutually Agreed
)Joan by the parties hereto unless, prior to the
t
j cosmencemant of construction City and Aerosmith shall have
j agreed to a schedule of dep^eeistioo on such structures and
buildings which would parm,. t in evaluation thereof at a!n
paint during the life of this agreement. loth illy and
} i Aerosmith do further agree that If City does not exeretla
1
i its right of repurchasd as provided herein and Aorosmith
I corporation exercises its secondary right to repurchase j
that unless within thirty (70) days from the exercise of
a
such Aorosmith Corporation and City shall agree to a
new contract whereby Aerosaith Corporation loales the
property herein leased to Aseosmith or, at AerolAith
Corporation's option, It should elect to continut
ooteaticns under the terms and conditions of this agreement y
i
i with Aorosmith for the unexpired term thereof. Aerosmith
Corporation shalt within ninety (90) days thereafter, and
upon the payment of said purchase price to City, remove
laid atrtatures and buildings Gram the tease! eremites
leaving said leased orimiAa 'clean' in the sense that ill-
debris and noble Incident to said removal shall be carried
?AGE f0
a
i
r ne kL.. a. mac.. ~ ~.«.«ry
b
?MvnY!+
Off and that all Major damage, if Any. Incident to sold
removal shall be repaired.
i Ix.
SUSAOGATION OR MORTGAGEE
i
` Any person, corporation o- institution that leltds money to
I
Aerosaith for construction of any hangar, structure, building
or improvement and retains a security interest In said hangar,
structure, building or improvement shall, upon default of
Aerosatth's obligations to said mortgagee, have the right to
enter upon said leased premises and operate or manage said
E hangar, structure, building or improvement according to the
terms of this Agraerenh, for a period not to exceed the tern of
a
the mortgage with Aerasaith, or until the loan Is paid to
m full. Or, in the alternative, said mortgagee shall have the
right to remove such buildings or structures from the premises
provided, however, that such mortgagee shalt first notify City
i In writing of such Intent to remove and provide City, the first
right, and Aerasaith Corporation, the parent earporitlen of
f Aerosaith herein, the second right, within sixty (60) days of
such notice to Intent, to purchase such buildings and 1
III y
structures taught to be removed. Should Aerasaith Corporation
r - - _
acquire the property or, properties In this
_ paragraph referred
k ! to through its right to purchase under the circumstsncel herein
provided, Aerasaith Corporation shall then comply with the
terms and provisions in Mlti. C. hereinabove as the sage are
applicable to Its purchase of properties on the leased premises. ;
x ;
i
RIGHT Of EASEMENT
City shall have the right to establish easements, at no
cost to Aerasaith, upon the leased grr,und space for the purpose
of providing utility services to, from or across the Airport
,
property, However, any such easements shall not interfere with
Aerosmith's use of the 'leased ground spate' and City shall
restore the property to Its original condition upon the
j
PAGE 11
i
3
1
s.t'a:WM ,w l~>o':it'•iRti.'+Yia57'+t`I.AXk~O[i'.ifiiFa"'aw'r' "--•••v
E
b1?i-~nm
Y
Illt services on in over or ender an
installation of any ut y Any
such easement. r
CANCEttAYtOK eY CITY
in the event that Aerosaith shall file a voluntary petition
in bankruptcy or proceedings in bankruptcy shall be instituted
against it and Aerosaith thereafter is adjudicated bankrupt
pursuant to such proceedings, or any court shall take jurts.
diction of Aerosaith and Its assets pursuant to proceedings
brought under the provisions of any Federal reerganlteN an act,
I or Aerosaith shall to divested of its estate herein by other
! operation of lair, or Aerosaith shall fall to Perform, keep and
i
observe any of the torts, covenants, or conditions herein
~lll contained, or on its part to be performed, the City may give
I Aerosaith written notice to correct such condition or cure such
1
default and, If any condition or default shall Continue for
thirty {30) days after the receipt of Such notice by Aerosaitn,
i ~
` the City may, after the lapse of said thirty (30) day period
and prior to the Correction or curing of such Condition or
j default, terminate this lease by a thirty (30) days written
I
i notice, Citj and Aerosaith agree, however, that -should.
l
Aeroseith's default be for any reason other than Aerosmith't
- i
j default in the paYment of the Rentals and Foot N are provided
herein, City shall have, upon default by Aerosaith. the first
right, and Aerosaith Corporation shall have the sstood right to z
purchase any or all of the properties theretofore Consfrortod
J by Aerosslth provided it, Aerosaith Corporation, does so under
the terms and Conditions as provided In Vitt, C. hereinabove as S
th same _ are applicable to Its purchase of properties on the
~ibb~.~rb~w.~rrbrrrr
leased premises,
3
u r~r_ lit.
CANCELLATION _SY A
Aerosaith may Cancel this Agreement, in whole or part, and j
terminate all or any of Its obiigWer.s hereunder at any time,
j
PAGE 1Z
i
E
1
i
Aw;
by thirty (30) do Y1 written notice, upon or after the happening
of any one of the follcuitig eventlS issuance by any Court of
competent jurisdietton' of a permanent injunction In any way
preventing or restraining the use of said airport or any part
' thereof for airport purpolesl any action of the Civil
Aeronautics Board and/or Federal Aviation Agency refusing to
permit Aerotmith to operate into, fro,% or through said airport
such aircraft as Aerosmlth may resionabil desire to operate
I I theraonl the breath by City of any of the covenants jr
i agreements contained and the failure of City to remedy 141:h
i breach for . period of thirty (30) days after receipt of a
! ` I written notice of the existence of such breschf the inability
r
of Aeroemith to use said premises and facilities Continulig for
,
' a longer period than ntnity (20) days due to any law or any
1 i order, rule or regulation of any appropriate governmental
authority having jurisdiction over the operations of Aerosmith
~ i
or due to war, earthquake or other casualtyl the assumption or
I recapture by the United States government or any authorlted
I I agency thereof of the maintenance ind opera ton of said airport
and facilities or any substantial part ~r parts thereof, y
~ Kitt.
COYENAKi NOT-TR GRANT MORE FAVORABLE TERMS
City covenants and agrees not to enter into or/ lease,
contract, or agreement with any other persdn, fire or
iorporition with respect to the airport Containing more 3
favorable terms than this agreement or to grant to any other
person, fire or corporitfoi rights, privileges or concessions
L with respect to said airport which are not accorded to
Aeroomith horeundar unless the same rights, privileges a,.d
Concessions are concurrently and automatically eade iviilsble
to Aerosmith.
tlY. S
RECAPTURE OF ADMINISTRATION SUILDINO
_r
City, upon giving Aerdsmith ninety ;90) Jays notita, may It
any time durNng this Agreement recapture the Adroinistritldn
?AGE 13
i
I
Building and, if it chooses, the area immediately surrounding
the Administration Building as shown an txhtbit 426 attached /
hereto and do so under the following conditionst
A. Should City elect to recapture only the idOmistration
6u11d1nq It shall rell"quish 1t1 right to subs ea`uent1y
recapture the area shown an txhl it 024 imme0 ate y
surrounding said building.
8. Should the City elect to recapture the Administration
Building as well at the area immediately surrounding it as
shown an txhlbit 2 attached hereto, City shell provide
Aerosmith, prior to the effective data of recapture, eighty
thousand (80,0001 square feet of asphalt ramp on t,ts lasted
I propertyi the new ramp to be in an approximate
configuration of 200 x 100 feet, and upon the completion of i
said ramp and commencing with the effective data of
4 recapture Aerosmith will thereafter pay to City ton (10%)
percent of All monthly parking and/or tie-down fees which
4
{ it receives on Its total ramp area, to this latter y
connection, both partial uAderstand and agreeQN a tht~h~0~e! 1
planes owned by Aerosmith and/or Aerosmith Corp. do not pay
parking or tie-down has,
C. Upon recapture by the City under A or 8 above
Aerosmith's ground lease shall terminate on that portion of ,
the toiled premises recaptured and nothing shell preclude
or interfere with City's ingress and egress to and from
3
Such reclaimed property.
0, In that area recaptured by City It will not engage In,
nor stilt it permit any third Party to engage In, the
following actlvitiest
: 1, Avionic Was and Services
2Selling of Pilot Supplies
1. Operation of s Plight School
3, Aircraft Storage
S. Alrera/t Maintenance
rJ PACE 14
a
WA*
I
1
t r
6. Aircraft Sales
Aircraft Rental
Aircraft Charter
9. Foal Sales
I Nor wit! City permit overnight or monthly tfe•doWA
Aaule the ad scent area to the Ada1nlstration 8u1ld1ng
l
i f be recaptured.
XM.
r ASSIONNINT OF LEASE
Aerosmith shell not At any time lfgn this loose or any
i
3 part thereof without the Cdatent In writing of City, prodded
that the foregolRq shall flat prevent the alslgnment at any time
i
of this !date to any Corporation with which Aerasmith may serge
f or Consolidate or which MAY succeed to the business or assets
of Aerosmith or a substantial part ther/afi such consent shall i
`rIk not be unreasonably withheld.
1 , l
XVI.
t u Er EN_ JO~EM1
City agrees that, on payment of the rent and
1 the tavenantt and agreements an the part of Arosao Of
I perforsad hereunder, Aerotaith shall 01y hold holdalth th and t to enjoy
nd r
I
f j this contract, the leased premises and nd III the rights and
Primates of sold airport, its appwrtinahtee and facilities,
within the limits hefefn ranted,
j XYII.
~J 40_ TIE E!
Notices to the City provided for herefn thall be sufficient
If sent by registered mail. postage prepaid, addressed to the
City Secretary of the Cot t
y Of Olnten tetass End notices to e
Aerasmith, if sent by registered mall, Postage
propildi
444rassee to Aerosmith Denton Corporation, Denton NunfCfpal
Airport, Denton, resos 78201, or to such other respective
addresses it either of the parties may designate In arlting
from time to time Ind forward to the other,
7A CE 1S r
1 .
-^^.wi WI W w'1 d,c..T ~K~'K. ~11. W1Y RV W a/..twNw. e... 1
• I
i
IVttt. ,
REO[LIVERV AT EIfIRATION Of LEASE
Aeroimith will quit possession of all premises respectively
i leased herein at the and of the term ipacifltd herein with
respect thereto, or any renewal or extension thereof, and
A deliver up such pr its is at to City in as good condltlon~ is
extsted when possession was taken, fair wear and tear, acts of
v
gad and the elements, as well is any other casualty not
occasioned by the fault of M rosmlth, and casualty covered by
r City's insurance, alone excepted. 1
4 I AIR. i
COMPLIANCE YITN_OOV[RNM[NTAL ACCULATIONS ty
j }
City warrants and rtpresenti unto Aerosmith, and the game
is declared of the assenca hereof, that said City, in the
11 establishment, construction and operation of the said Denton s
1 Municipal Airport, has heretofore and thii time complying #S
with all existing rules and ragulatiaos, and erlterls
1I distributad by the federal Aviation Agency, Civil Aeronautics
I Board, or any other governmental authority relating to and
inn.tuding, but not limited to nolse abatement, air rights and
w emeoti over adjoining and Contiguous areas, ovar.flight in y
landing or tako•off, to the end that Aarosmith will not hh
legally liable for any action of trispais or similar civet of
f {
action by vir .,t of any aerial Operations over adjolnlng
property in the course of normal takeoff and landing
procedures from said Oenton Runictpol Airport City f~rthar
z
warrants and reprotahts that at tl1 times during the term
htrtof, or any renewal or extension of the time, that it will
continue to comply with the foregoing. j
II.
mothisIn this eontrset shall be Conatrued ae ddittdd
renegotiation of the Contract at the plusurs of Oath partial j
harito.
i I
sAOE t6 ~ '
{
~ XXI.
! CONFLICT OF INTEREST
City etcognISet that ' this contract, as 'were the prior
f contracts which this instrument supercedet, was negotiated
while Aerosmlth emPtayees were Serving as airport manager,
i without remuneration from City and were not at any t1Ae
1
employees of the City, City therefore agreat that it does net
now, nor will It hereafter, claim that there exist any confict
{ of intern t in the negotiation leading up to and consummated by "
the execution of this Agreement,
t IN WITNESS WHINED?, the partial have executed this
1 agreement the day and year first above written, in multiple
copies of like tenor and offset, each of which Shell be deemed
in original copy. ~
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
SYs n
l
f ATTESTS r
JKUVK~
TT 'a'
CITY Of OEN~QN, TEXAS
I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
ATTOANCY, C11Y 0~ OENTON, LO TEXAS
AEROSMITN OENTON CORPORATION
ITS
ATTEST:
Aaara~ed te6 lareed at the fawr 1e ~eetleerle M a~.~..r~►
i OrpON lOn. - - - ~
AEROSMITN CORPORATION
SY:
ATTESTS
MftU
PAGE 17
(r
I t M~...«.•+....~w„MVl'W1rn air r.~:ar •a~.~-a.... . e•v.~w PMTY W066
f
i
SCALE; I"%400' 1
i
i
,
i
LIMITS OF RECOVERABLE AREA j
i
II a
LIMITS OFAEROSMITH LEASE c
l ~
k r
f 1 L
. r
r -
EXHIBIT NO. 2
METES AND BOUND$ DESCRIPTION
GROUND ADJACENT TO TERMINAL
BUILDING RECOVERABLE BY CITY
i
' t
y
M
i
I
$CALEi I"s 400@
i
i
I
4 LIMITS OF AEROSMITH LEASE
~6 t
2 2A 5
3 I
f
i
{
EXHIBIT NO.
BUILDINO IDENTFICATION-DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
t w"
4v,
I
I
,
z1j"ErBob $mIth r t._, tr,j 4i:
f a. i V h, y r
tiiiJii'J~+,.~.i•:i~~ '°.cr...;~...::~~•✓
k t t i..:~s:.`...r•4iiFrLC.+~. 1
I
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS. AS
AS AN APP
SAME TED
OF O DENTON,STEXAS, By ORDINANCEENO, 69 1,HANDiAS SAIDROMAPAAPPLIE TOEAPPROXICITY
MATELY 16 fCRES OF LARD AS SHOWN THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF
S 444 THE CITY OF DWON TEXAS AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN1 AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
t
THE C04NOIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS, HEREBY OROAINSt
} 1'
R ; SECTION 1.
That the Zoning Map of the Cit of Denton, Texas, adapted the 14th
I day of January, 1969, as an Appendy ix to the Code of Ordinances of the
Z I City of Denton, Texas. under provisions of Ordinance No. 69.1, bo, and
r I the same is hereby amended as Follow
f r
~ All the hereinafter described property 1s hereby removed from the Agri-
cultural 'A' District aS shown on sell Zonlnq Map, and all provisions. of
Ordinance No. 69.1, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as amended,
shall hereafter apply to Said property as Planned Development 'PO'
District in the same manner as other property located in the planned
Development 'PD' District for the development of single family detached
homes on lots it minlnum of 6,000 square feet in sine, with the following
condltlonsS !
1. The proposal for detached single family homes on lots totalling a
a minimum of 6,000 square feet in site shalt obterve minimum setbacks
required In the Single Family '04' soninq classification; and a
2. Plat approval shill constitute site plan approval for this tingle
family area on Lots 9, 10, and 11, 81ock 167. t
I
f i All that certain tot, tract or parcel of land 1r1nq and boloy situated in- D
i ! the City and County of Denton, Tetras, and being more particularly des.
I cribed is approximately 16 acres of land located at the southwest inter.
section of }bckingbfrd Lane and Audra Line in the City of Denton, Texas.
i! SECTION tl
I That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby finds that
such change 1s in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of
I promotln44 the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with
I re+sonable consideration, among other things for the character of the
district and for its peculiar sultablllt~r or particular usU, mod with e 1
view to conserving the value of the butldin s, protecting human lives
to and the coCity urag ofg Denton, Texas. And its titifens.
t
£CTTS CY I11' 4
a That tnia oruin+nce %hill be in full forte and Affect immediately
{R after It: assnga and approval, the ro utred pubilt hetrings having
heretofore been held b the Planning end ~oning Commission and the city
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AISD APPROVED this the 4th day of September, A. 0. 1979,
E
CITY OF 0~ E%AS
AINSTS
t
tflfd11 BdLTZTf4 3LfAE17tR7 ;
ON, TEXAS
(j CITY OF DENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
,
C7 ~Mlir 777-
._,...~,.,..a..w~Ma~r~ctala~e!*?F~ikhw''A►M.rnartw.w a..,.,....
r-'.rte r., 1
~~G7r*1~ ~r G `sue M J M rS M r s rov r 7 :7
h , a
~yM1* ..~'V. ~lAII~~AY.eAda -Y ja 1tF~v r.14 N'~,,j, t., l~ltih rl+ir C','.1
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T11E IONINC NAP OF THE CITY OF OENTON,
E TE AS AS $A!a£ WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO T14C COOE OF
AND1 SN SAID MAPH APPLIESOTOOLOTO J, BTEXAS, BY LOCK 740, OAs SHOWN THIS 609.1
ATE
ON THE OFFICIAL TAX NAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE
j PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI i
} SEOTID~ I.
f
14thThdaythoflJe uar F 1969h,o utysnf Appendix Ttas't~e adopted the
Ordinances of Cie Clty of Denton, Texas, under provisions of
Ordinance No. 69-11 be, and the same Is hereby amended as follower
All the hereinafter described property Is hereby removed from the f
Multi-Family "HF-I' Oistrlct is shown on said Zoning Map, and all
provisions of Ordinance No. 69.1, adopted the 14th day of
January, 1969, as amended, shall hereafter apply to laid property t
as Single Family "SF.10 District in the some manner as other
property lccated in the Single-Family "SF.7" Districts
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying end being
situated in the City and County of Oentan, Texas and being more
portleuiarly described as Lot 7, Block 948 of the official tax
map of the City of Denton fixes and also known is 609 rest Oak
Street, in the City of Demon, Texel.
SECTION lit
i
That the City Council of the City of Oenton, Texas hefeby
finds thct such bhange is in eccordande with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable eonslteretibn, among other
things for the character of the district and for Its peculiar
I owltabflitj or particular uses, and with a view to Conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, end its cltirens.
I SECTION LIZ. ~
1 ~
ImmediatelyhafterrdItsnpCassagelandsapprovol,ltheortequi d ppauElic
hearings having hetetafore been held by the Plenning and 2dning c
Commission and the City Counoii of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving this novice thereof.
PASSEJ 4NO APP40 Y10 this the Ith day of Septembet, A. 0. 1479.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
v
ATTESTj
j
j
t
l
RO xS M UL CI C R
CITY OF DEN 40 No Y TEXAS
~ I
I I
APPROVED AS to LECAL FOA4t
i
I
■ I
I
4
r,"rr•r.;'°T Ri ^hi1 r, r! - ,~ti r n.. R -I a M;• •-T •r r: +.r.
i J I > f,r 714 ~St 11 t 1. i,1E i.
. ~ a•b r ...c•in:~r~.. i6,.-f~~L ~:kitit a !L'.~ ~f ,A..:_
AN ORDINANCE ANENOING flit ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTO11, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCF. NO, 69.1, AND AS SAID NAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIIATELY 3.766 ACRES OF LARD , AS SHOWN THIS DATE
On THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY OF O£NTON TEXAS, AID MORE
PARTICULARLY OBSCAISEO THEREINI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVt DATE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAIHSt
S(CiiON 1.
A
Y
That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
loth day of January, 1969, all an Appendix to the Code of Ord4n-
antes of the City of Oentdn, Texas, under prdvlsioHS of Ordinance
No. 69.1, be, and the Same it hereby amended is follow n
c t
All the hereinafter described property 11 hereby reclassified at
i below descrlyod as shown on said Zoning pop, and all provisions of
Ordinance No. 69.1, addotcd the lath day of January, i949,.as
1. 1.37 acres of land )ccoted near the northeast corAer of
f i Dallu and Hopkins Drive shall be removed from the Agricultural
I "A' District to the Multi-Family 'NF-1' District in the same
{ manner, as other property located in the Molti•Famlly. 'MF.I' 1
District{ y
2. 1.773 acres of land beginning 40 fast nbeth of the Dallas
and Hopkins- Drive Intersection shall be removed from the
Agricultural District 'A• to the General Retail 'GR' District in T
the tame manner at other property located In the Gdnerai Retail
'GR. Olstrlctl and
3. 623 acre of land beginning 230 feet north of the Dallas
and Hopkins Drive intersection shalt be removed from the lgppht
Industrial 'LC' Oistrict to General Retail 'GR' District in Ehe
fine manner as other property located In the General Retail vGA' r
k District.
SECTiOI It.
i
J That the City Council of the City of 9enton, Texas hereby
]j finds that such Change is in accordance with t comprehensive Olen
for the purpose of'pe6motiiig the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
f things for the character of the district and for Its peculiar f
suitability or partictlar uses, and with a view to Contervfng the i
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and Oneouragfog
the molt appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton. Texas, and its cititens. f
SECTION i11. 1
That tri, n•dl•sree Shall be in full force and *(feet
immediately after its passage and approval, the regilred ubllc
hearings hav!ng heretofore been held by the Planning and ~oning
lk Commission sna the City Council of the City of Dentpin, Tolls, f
after giving due notate thereof. I
PASSED Ah0 APPROv90 this the 4th day of September, A. 0. 1979.
,
CITY OF O1W ON, TEXAS
{{i ATTEST:
1 '
TESEEtCRETA1t1' I
C17Y OF OEnTON, TX AS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOAIi:
i
4 4
7T,7 "T7
e 7
unta~ a rPoli`eP«~~.2ae tdr
N0,
AN ORDINANCE V-1-"V+9 THE ZONIN(I MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, AS
SAME WAS ADOPTED AS Al APPENDiT TO THE CODE OF DROINAKES OF THE CITY OF
x DENTON, TEXAS, BY DRDINAP;CE H0. 69.1, AND AS SAID NAP APPLIES TO APPROxI-
MATELY 2.5 ACRES CF LAND, AS SH014N THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF
THE CITY OF CE,MT0, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY OESCRfeED THEREIN, AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the Zoning Mao of the 0 ty of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1959, as as APPeodix to the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas, under provisions of Ordinance Me. 69-1, be, and, I
the same is hereby a,rtnded at follows: t
L
i All the hereinafter oetcrtbed property ft hereby removed from the
Mu1tt•famlly "DV-lm Ofstrfct as shown on sold Zonlrg Map, and all
provisions of Ordinanct No, e9-I, adopted the 140 day of January, 196p p
as amtnded, shall hereafter ipply,to said property as Light Industrial
"Li" District in the saga manner as other property locatld to the Light i
Irdustrfil "LI" District;
A
the
ll that certain lot, tract or parctl of land lying and being tituated til And cribedtasaapproximately 2.5t acreseof stand amd e9 grloutMconithe weft
i side of Noodrof Lint, .3 mile South of East Mcltfnney Street in the City
of Denton, Texas.
i
SECTION t1,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby finds that
such change is In accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of
II peomOttng the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with
reasonable consideration, among other things foe the character, of the
district and for its peculiar fuitsbility or partltulir uses, and with a
view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives
and encouraging the fait appropriate uses of ?and for the eaximum benefit
to the City of Denton, Texas, and its cititena. ti
i SECi10n ?ll, i
That this erdinante shalt be in full force and effect Immediately
after its passage and approval, the rejuired public hearings having
heretofore teen held b the Planning and Zoning Comalssioo and the City
Council of 1.4e City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED c.axo;i£J this the 4th dad of September, A. 0, 1919.
i
BILL 4x P
CITY OF UNION, TEXAS f
ATTEST:
CITY OF 09000. TEXAS
3
APPROVED AS TO MAL FORA:
i
FIAT
CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS
I
. ~ ~*raM,' oMi' +wM.e~t.~,kyAll Mwryga•aw
' .911V~ r
1
2-1397 Barry Wachal
i
I
i
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OP THE CITY 06 DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO TUB CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES OF LAND, AS SHOWN THIS DATE ON
THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP Or THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THERBINr AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
t
s THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEKAS, HERESY ORDAINS$
SECTION.,
r That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
I 11th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances
f r of the City of Denton, Texas, under provisions of Ordinance No,
69-1, be, and the same s hereby amended as followir
All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed from the
C Agricultural "A" District as shown on said Zoning map, and all
provisions of Ordinance No. 69-1, adopted the 14th day of January,
1969 as amended, shall hereafter apply to said property as Single
I Family "SF-10" and single family "BP-7 District in the same manner
i as other property located in the Single Family 'SF-10" and Single q
r` II Family "01-7 District and pore particularly described as follower
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of lend lying and being
r situated 6-i the City and County of Denton, Texas, and being sore
particularly described as a proximately 30 acres of land and being
Lot 69, Block 4070 and being located at the northeast corner or t
Westgate Drive and Payne Drive. The northernmost 100 feet 19.15)
II mores is approved for Single Family 'SF-10" District and the
remaining 20.65 acres of said tract is approved for Single Family
"sr-7a District.
SECTION U.
That the City Coun-%il of the City of Denton, Texas hereby finds
E that such change is la accordance with a comprehensive plan !or the
purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton,
Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for d
the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or '
particular uses, and with a view to conserving the velum of the i
buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most
appropriate used of land for the mar!mum benefit to the City of
Denton, Texaa, and its eitisens,
i
LMION III.
5
S
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immedisteiy after its pessrre
and approval, the roqui Nd public
I
heating s having heretofore en held byy the Planning and Zoning ;
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after
giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of Septembers A. D. 1979, j
111,16 NASH# R1111
CITY F DENTON# TEXAS
I
A,TTESTi
. BAOOXS HOLT, T R
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS
I i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS 11
MIST I. WORM, 1 I. . 77- j
Will,.
1
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LONINO hAP OF THE CITY OF DXNTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME wAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE 000E Of ORDINANCES Of THS
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE 1,0. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 6.S ACRES Of LAND, AS SHOWN THIS DATE ON
THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS, AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERESY ORDAINS,
} Y
SECTION I.
That the toning MAP Of the City of Denton, Taxes$ adopted the
11th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances
of Dentonr Texas, under peovisiona of OrdinanOe No, 3
ity
of the .
69-1, be, and the same is hereby Omani e as followst
All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed from the
Agricultural 'A' District as shown on said toning Map, and all
yrovisions of Otdinance go. 69-1 adopted the 11th day of January,
1969, as amended, obeli hereof ter apply to said property as
Multi-Family Restricted 'MP-R" District in the sane mannsr as other
property located in the Multi-Family Restricted 'MF-R' Districts {
All that certain lot, !tact or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Danton, Texas, and being more
yartieulerly described as approximately 6.5 acre, o[ land and being
located approximately 600 feet north of University Drive and
spptoximateiy 600 lest west Of the western e4ge of the North
t { University Plact Addition in the City of Dentonr Texas.
s
OECTION It.
~ That !na City Council at the City of Denton, flexes hetebp finds
that such change it in accordance with r, compcehensivo plan for the tt
purpose of promoting the general welters of the City of Dentonr s
Texas, sad with reasonable consideretionr among othee things for
i the character of the district and rot its peculiar suitability or
ppactioulae user, and with a view to conserving the value of the
F j bulllin s, protectin human lives, and encouraging the molt {
b
appropriate uses of land for- the maximLoo- Writ' to tH City of
If Denton, Tessat and its citSeens,
~ 9ECTIOw 12 G
That this ordinoncppe shell be pin full force and affect
heeaarings having Aerecotoro abton nheld Pbyv the Planningiand tonublio
Commission and the city council of the City of Denton, Texas, after
giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1th day of Saptembetr A. D, 1979. }
i
d
ILL NASHt MAYOR s
CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS
ATTESTr !
SRWRT go to r IT R AR 1
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LWht, FORNt j
{
HURT R. SOLO~§i ING C TYY -
ATTORNEY, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TE'(AS, DISANNEKING CERTAIN
PORTIONS OF LAND AS A PART OF THE CITY OF DENTON; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it has been proposed to the City Council of the City
of Denton, Texas, that it Ia desirable and to the best Interest of
the City of Denton, Texap, that the prcperty described herein be
dieannexed as a part of said Cityi and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has not been able to and data not
foresee being able to provide governmental and proprietary
services to the property within the next three years which Is r
f
sub.ntantially equivalent to the standard of governmental and
ptoprietaty services furnished by the City to other areas similar
in topography, patterns of land utilisation, and population d
density of the propertyi and
t
WHEREAS, it appears that the majority of the owners of the
land more particularly described below are desirous of being
disanneaed from the City of Denton, Texaei
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land, lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and $
being all of a cal'-td 71.73 acre tract of land as conveyed by deed
dated June 20, 1956, from Terrell W. King, Jt, and Tettell i
Whiteman King9, lit, to Gentita Elisabeth King, as shown of record
in Volume 4]4, Page 116 of the Deed Records of Denton County, t
Texasi all being out of the James Severe Sutvey, Abstract No.
1161, and being more particularly described as followsr a
3
BEGINNING at a steel pin at the northwest Corner of the above
mentioned called 71.73 acre tract, same being the northwest corner
of the JamN Severe Survey, Abstract No. 1164, sold point of
Ilf beginnin4q being-20-feet welt Of the contarline of a north and
south ggublic road whose width to 60 rest, said begqinning point
boundary line of a pubs a road whole j
being at wthat ho ttloi the 40 t foott
THKNCB north 89 degrees 34 minutes 11 seconds east along tM north
bounderY Tina of said James Severe survey, and the north boundary
Y
line of said called 71.73 acre tract, same being a relics line, i
2083.00 rest, to a steel pin and railroad crosstie dance Corner {
goat for the northeast corner of said 71.31 sore tract and being
n the vast boundary line of the Texas and Pacific Railroad right s
of ways
THENCE southwesterlyi along the aro of a curve to the left and the f
west boundary line of the Texas and Pacific Railroad
(!M chord ;
of this part of curve being south 79 dagives 40 minutes 14 seconds
wes!),_/50.00 fast to s steel pin tot the PC of said eurval ;
THENCE mouth 26 degrees 17 minutes vast aloeq the fence line and
the vast boundary line of the Texas and Pacific Railroad, 650.00
feet to a steel pin for cornarl
THENCE south 27 degrees 24 minutes west along the vast boundary
lint of said Texas and Pacific Railroad, 500.00 feat to a steel {
Pin for a Corner$ 1
i
a
jr
I
I
THENCS south 28 degrees 02 minutes west along fence line and the
west boundary line of sad Texas and Pacific Railroad, 2782,63 feet
to a steel pin for the mouth corner of the Xing 71.73 acre tract
and being in the west boundary line of the James severe Survey,
Abstract No. 1161, and being 20 feet west of the centerline of
public road running north whose width is 60 feet,
y THENCE north 00 degrees 32 minutes 30 seconds West along the west
boundary line of said James Severe Survey, 3858.38 feet, to a
point of beginning and containing 88.083 acres of usable land, or
} net acreage, and 4.429 acres in public road making a total
r distance of 92.512 acres of land, more or less,
,
c
NON, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINS,
SECTION I.
(1) That the matters and facts recited herein in the preamble
of this ordinance are hereby found and determtned to be true and
Correct.
(2) That, pursuant to Articles 970a and 1175(2), Vernon's
Texas Civil Statutes, the above deecribed property is hereby
discontinued an a part of the City of Denton, Texas.
7 13) That the City Secretary is hereby authorised and directed
to enter this ordinance on the minutes and tecotda of the City of
Denton, Texas, to the elect that said property Is dtsannexed as a
part of the City of Denton, Texas, and after the entry of this
I ordinance the said property shall Cease to be a part of the Clty k
} of Denton, Texas.
BECTION it.
That this ordinance shall bsco4e effective immediately after
its passage and approval. 4
4 PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of September, A. D. 1979,
f
r
BILL
CITY OF DCNTON~ TEXAS
1 ,
ATTESTr
)
MORE MULT, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OY DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL hiMe
ri
s
1
BURT R. MOORS, ACTINO CIR
ATTORNEY, CITY OF OSNTUN, MAB
4
NO.
MENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AN ORDINAWAD
AS SAME WPTEO AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF APPLIES TO DENTON, TEXAS, 8486 9D1FEETEOF L AND, MORE AND A ESSA OUT MAP OF
LOT 8 BLOCK 187.2, AS SHOWN THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION I. w
That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
lath day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances
of the City of Denton Texas, under provisions of Ordinance No.
69-1, be, end the same Is hereby amended as follows:
All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed from the
Azovisions ofwOrdininee No. as sh on 14th day of Je uary,
1969, as amended, shall hereafter apply to said property as Light
Industrial "LI" District in the same manner as other property
located in the Light Industrial "LI" District ant more particularly
described as followsl
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, Taxes, and being more
{ particular) described as approximately 486.9 feet of land, more or r
i less out of Lot 6, Block 187-2 and being that southern portion of
the 8 acre tract of land located north of McKinney Street in the
f City of Denton, Texas.
I SECTION It.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas heraby finds
that such change Is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the
purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton,
I Texas and with reasonable consideration, among other things for
the c6TICter of the district end for Its peculiar Suitability or
g articular uses and with a view to conserving the value of the 1
uildingqs Pro~ectinp human lives, and encourepping the most
approprfa~e uses of land for the maximum benefit to the city of I
Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its ppassopa and o provall the required public
he rings having heratofore been held b the Planning and toning j
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after
' I giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of September, A. D. 1019.
CITY DF OjHTON, TEXAS j
ATTEST, 4
"OOTOr IN DERION, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
ATTORNEY, CI 0~ OENTON, TEXAS
i
1
R+
1
I
1
1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE /WENDING ORDINANCE NO. 78-8 OP TAB 80NING MAP OF THR
CITY Of DAUM, TEXAS, AS ADOPTED ON THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY,
A.D. 1978, BY AMENDINO 12) OF ORDINANCE NO. 76-8 TO PERMIT 116 1
UNITS ON 5.8 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF LOT 20, BLOCK 136-8# AND BRING i
LOCATED ON THE NORTE SIDE OF WINDSOR DRIVE, AS SHOMN ON THE
I OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THR CITY OF DENTON, TRXASM AMID MOAN
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREINs AND DECLARING AN RFYEC M DATE.
i
I ~ THE couaclL DF THE CITY of oRMTON, TEXAS, EERRBY oROAINal r`
SECTION I.
}
That Ordinance No. 78-80 parsed and approved an the 21st day
of February, 1978, is hereby amended by changing section I, No. 10
of the said ordinance to read as followse
01. No more than 116 units shall be developed on the
multi-family site in this proposal. The multi-
family develepaent, together with the facrsa-
tionai aces, shall require site plan approval
and shall be designed in auah a manner that will
feasibly permit single famiroply housing to be
I s construeted on adjoining perties an has been
s
P npo
3 SECTION II.
i
{ 1 That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby
t finds that such change is in accordance with a oomprehensite plan
for the purpose of promoting the aneral welfare of the City of
Denton, Texasp and with reasonable ocnsideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for Its
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserviiaglthe
the value of a propriate unto oftand gforwthe sa:lsaum bbeenefenoo itt togthe
( City of Denton, Texas, and its aititens.
III ~a 'IQIl~fII. i
i ` That this ordinance shall be in full force and offset
immediately-aftar its pau a and approval, the toquiraed~ public... .
bearings having beretofote been held by the planning and saint
Commission and the City Connoil of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof. I
PASBAD AND APPROVED this the 28th day of Auguut, A. D. 1070.
f
MAYOX
CITY OP DCNTDHa TEXAS
ATTESTi
t
i CITY VECRZTAR
CITY OF DRNTON, TEXAS
APPROVED At TO LEGAL FORMt
BURT R. 80 S, T N I
} ATTORNEY, CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS
i ,
t
r
i
.<..,........<.-c.o.:ra~.a.k:4'et'Yhsat3ih$ra:;^~,nA*s.",.,......._._...
DAT3: SEPTEMBER 4, 1979
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: Sale of Distribution Transformers to North Texas State University.
SUMMARY:
N SU is in progress of installing an underground 13,2 KV electric
distribution system to combine their electric service from approximately 24
electric metering locations to 2 locations. Negotiations regarding the sale
price and the transfer of title and maintenance responsibility resulted in an
agreement as outlined in the attached draft resolution (Exhibit I),
i 1
FISCAL. SUAl4ARY:
Payment by NM of Purchase Order No. 43499 dated 7/12/79 to the City of
Denton $125,000, j
ACTION RBQUIRBD: ;
Approve sale of the facilities as listed.
ALTERNATIVES: 1
1 ~
1) Approve sale.
2) Modify sale provisions
3) Disapprove of sale,
S
RBOMfENDATIONS:
The Public Utility Board, at their August 29, 1979 meeting, recommended to
the Council approval of the sale of the distribution system facilities and
adoption of resolution specifying terms and conditions.
1
i
Rest tfulll]y,
R. B. Nelscn
Director of Utilities t
e
EXHIBITS:
I, Resolution
II. RM purchase Order
IY1. E. Tullos Memo
I
rw•w_... _...\,.+.me..w.:yy rSF.f. M4~'M tNd,MtE.Y.r w"..m .e+..x+w _,...,-...y.
f
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE 4TH J
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, A. D. 1979. I
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Denton currently owns the electrical 3
system located at the North Texas State University Caspusl and
i WHEREAS, the electrical service to North Taxes State
University is presently metered at twenty-six (26) locatlonsi
and
WHEREAS, North Texas State University his expressed a
desire to purchase the City of 0enton's electrical system now
In use and thereafter purchase the electrical power At the
primary voltage of 13,200 volts at two separeto locattomil and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton his
expressed a willingness to sell s•4ch electrical system) and
i
' WHEREAS, North Texas State University has offered to
purchase the said electrical system for 1125,000.00 by Issuance
of a purchase order for such system; and
I WHEREAS, the City Council het determined that the sale of
subject distribution system facilities to North Texas State
University with the subsequent removal of 26 individual
metering points and the subsequent furnishing of wholesale
j electrical power end energy at two aetarinp polnti would mat
impare assentlol and effective utility serviea to NTSU or the
remaining utility customers and further that subject facilities
would be considered temporarily surplus if not sold to North
Texas State Universltyf and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton Utility Board his reviewed And
t
recommended approval of such a transfer of the said alectricil
systems and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oenton, after b
careful, consideration of the matter believes it to be in the
best interest of the City of Denton and Its cititims to sell
the sold electrical system)
i
' NOW, THEREFORE, BE It RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THATi
SECTION 1~
The City Council of the City of Denton has hereby agreed to
j tell such 0,lettical s Item and aesooisted distribution trans-
formers and other rate ad facilities at outlined In Exhibit OA"
attached herewith and made a part of this A4101ution to North
Texia State University for the total sum of 1123,000.DDt pro.
vldod, howovor, that such fate shall no in full accordance to
the following circumitimeas)
j ,
for
(a) the transfer of title and ownershitrans.
individual at groupps of distribution formers and/or facllltiss shall remain with
the City of Denton until such time as any
such distribution ttansfotmer and also-
elated facility is completely do-enarlpiced
for the puepolA of pormittln North Texas
State University to convert their primary
fermar, ciitulwhich such distribution
ownarshioo control
and maintenance responsibility of such
distribution transformer and isaboiated
facility shall ttonsf/r automatically to
North Tema% State University.
j
'~/I~iSd..',,..,,,,.. •._.•.»-.•xv. rxa a`y~i,L Wf~rY uwWiY«t.~i'YA~»':i.~+°""`w,.
.i
tiwwxw~
(b) after any distribution transformer and
associated facility is so transferred,
North Texas State University shell make
full payment to the City of Denton of the
value o such distribution transformer and
associated facility.
(c) the meeting for each distribution trans-
farmer shall continue on an individual
j transformer basis until transfer of control {
and ownership of all distribution trans-
formers is complete at which time metering
f shell be accomplished through two nester
) meters, or until the ownership of a group
of transformers can be transferred to that
such electrical power to such transrormers
can be master metered.
(d) prior to any transfer of ownership of any
i distribution transformer or associated r
facility appropriate officials of North
s Texas State University shalt enter into t
written agreement wit the City of Denton
incorporating into such agreement the
aforementioned torts end conditions.
t SECTION LI_._
{ The Mayor of the City of Denton, Taxes, is hereby
authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City df
Denton any necNaary agreements or other legal documents to t
offectuate this 1110. r
j
PASSED. AND APPROVED this the 4th day of September, A. 0.
1970.
CITY Df DEMTON, TEXAS
s
ATTESTS
BROOKS HOLT AMY SECRETXRY-
CITY O DENT6N, TEXAS
3
APPROVED AS TO LECAL rORMi
C7K'IVlNl y OENMING CITY
ATG !01
TON, TEXAS
I
J
I
~~p __...,«n~`M+MIMF~~~~Ir~alls'-"'Y'fY'W~M..hCM e.rn m..«.r.._•__
I
I
' waea
F
SHIP F.O.D. TO teUhVHHut VIiiUth
` North Texas State University TI1FSFtv0S '--•r.ORNp 43499
k Central Receiving Warehouse MUSTAPPEAR
2204 W. Prairie Box 13766 ON ALL PACKACES
Denton, Texas 76203 RELATING TO RE N M-9-12904-H
SHIPPER THIS ORDER N NO'
City of Denton, Texas DATE July I's 10-19
n Chris Hartung SHOW REQUISITION and ORDER NUMBER ON INVOICE
Municipal Bldg.
.
INVOICING INSTRUCTIONS -
SEE REVERSE SIDE
Denton, TX 16201
f All terms and conditions set forth in out bid invitadon become
MAIL tNVOICE TOl NTSU9 P. 0. Box 13767 a pan of this order. ;
N.T. Station Vendor GUARANTEES Merchandise Delivered On Thls Ordat
Denton, TX 76203 Will MEET OR EXCEED SpecfBurions In The Bid Invitation.
i' Item
No - (Ucaee$tbal Quantity Unit Urjt
EatalMlOK i
Pike
r
1. Used electrical items comprising transformers; t 1 Lob am 9210': 1259000.00
x underground primary•hook-ups with miscellaneous
appurtenances, conduits, conductors, ete.j over-
head olea conductors etc.;
'r-•, primary hook-ups, P e e
and electric meters.
10
° TRANS OHD PRI 6 r r:
j BLDG. KVA Ila PRI WSC METE A
Mena gym 1-300 60 2A 400: F
Coliseum 1-2500 3151 i4/OA-' - 2000:
McConnell Hail 3-167 2601 02A - -
Music Practice 1-500 190' !2A - 2000 5
Clark 2-500 170' 12A - -
Bruce Hail. 3-100 280' 02A w
Biology 3-500 165' f2A 'y
Chemistry 3-167 80' 02A -
Library 1-2500 320' 14/OA - 1000 5
Men's Bldg. 1-300 100' 12A - 6001 r
Crumley 3-167 2401 #2A T-Rack 8001
' 1w cont. i
{
i
In meerdanes with your bid PtOOOW. suPplhn MUST be plesed In the departmMt
rataiylne roern In days from reeNpt of order. O.O.B. DeSTINATION Cash Olsaaun! % '
"Cash discounts will not be considered in determidlnj the low bld. O+Y~ i
All rash discounts offered will be taken if earned."
i
STATE SAW TAX Borchaer CERTIFICATE - The un.lerdanW ahEms en I
MOO Md front laxel u a CASphar 10.1110 I yyA~ReybeJ l'Irn Statulre of Tdau Wt - '
f sertonaf ptn ertP descrlhed in I It aumAared nrJu, pufchs.eJ /Mm
calnr 4m,110 s41 per listed 2Rnrr, is this ptnpert7 1s balm termed or, he die otrie S~A7 FC gdA OF
I' CONTROL
whf Staid of Te~iaa, ;
FAILURE TO DELIVER - If ISO eontraelnf lofts to JeGeef thna supplied by the 147
prunllaPpdelivery date of rasonahlt tlmo Ihefoo er, dytne atceplabte tedsuns o414%,
d''~ ~!y lr~~/••,,,,~
W it su lies ue trHelr of falloff to Intel s adMeat os, 11141 Staff ferefyes the ~u•%f,e a I i
urehd%d I ocifitd mppG•e etsaeherr, and charge the Masses In stiff end cwt of gy-- " Vfireh"ts Division I
Rem tine, Party at the tu.,,dcfur. No su 5111vtianf not tancellationr permitted without
pfiW Apph,yat ul the &IafJ of L'untn,l. P.O. soK $$say CAPITOL STATION
The Vold of Toss to exempt rrum all tYdetal Elitist Toted AUSTIN, TC'%AS 10 It 1 i
t I
qeR •~,,.:.zna.sauswaaw.;t;t~.ieAy.$+te!}I('i+,1ki~F:tliH.eartwvo...a.w,.ra.r,;w..",...••.,..
Page 2 of 2
STATE BOARD OF CONTROL
• weaMene eti+s--Ata+ nw >snt hr -.Z ..r _2._ ►.es
Gwh~r~iiiiiii I P1L-July 10' MZ2.
NTN-4-12944-H
Bidder Mud FM in ~ • • ~ • -
e RON"
a~...k.
• twewt M O +r U+H Mi,,,M.ii 4.NMw MINI.
TRANS PRI 6
BUILDING KVA UG PRI MISC METERS
Haple 2-S00 17S' e2A -
Student Union I-ISO0 360' e2A - 1200:5
a
i
Women's Gym 3-7S 210' I2A T-Rack 600:S
Kendall 1-750 1150 e2A - 1000:5
General
f Academic 2.750 220' 12A
Kerr 1-2500 315' e4/OA 2000:5
Art 1.1500 S00' 12A - 2000:5
i
Sr 6 9
Hearing 1-SOO 3350 e2A - 800:5
Wooten 1.750 14S' 12A - 800;5
Power PlantQl/Cu-2500 800 02A - 2000:S
Physical
Plant ONO 1
-1C0 S Poles 400;5 ii
3-SO 6SO
2 100/37 - 16C' SO4:S i'
West Hall 3.100 - 2 Poles S00:S
170' 06C
Racks
HPER I-SOO Yes - Yes
Quad 1 - S00:S
Quad It - - - SOOTS
Music Building Yes
KVA ■ kilo-volt ampere
UG,PRI • underground primary
HD PRI 4 MISC overhead primary and misccllancouq
LIN f
-t
t. e
l
MEMO
TOs UTILITY BOARD
i
Dates July 25, 1979
FROM- S.B. TULLOS
'i
SUBJECT- NTSU Purchase Order $43499
1
The equipment listed in this purchase order is from the Marshall
and Stevens Appraisal report dated 12/11/78 and was reviewed by
the City Council 7/3/79 and the staff was instructed to offer for
sale subject equipment at a price of $1250000.
If The adjusted appraisal value in this report was $143,588.
In the recommendation to the Council and combination of this ap-
praisal and an original cost plus replacement cost was used for a
total of $117,010.75 so that the final price approved by Council is
a compromise between the two values. a
{
It has been discussed with NTSU that the selling price would be
j payable immediately with the City to remain responsible for operation,
maintenance or replacement as long as the equipment is connected to s
the present electrical distribution system. Actual respohoibilty
of NTSU for the equipment would begin when it is connected to the
new primary metered underground system ender construction. It is
expected this will occur over a several month period and will not be i
completed until the summer of 1980. }
There are several other related items associated with the purchase
which NTSU has agreed to handle by separate purchase orders.
These include some overhead construction work at their service center,
the possibility of testiaq the electric meters listed on the purchase
order, and the rental or lease of the City's 2.4 KV substation ad-
jacent to the NTSU power plant.
{ ~ 1
1 g' {
{ a
L.B. Tullos,P.s.
Assistant Director of Utilities
j
i {
S
a i
i
s3
{
r ,
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 21, 1979
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider the final subdivision plat of The Village, Phase III.
SUMMARY:
r The property owner seeks to subdivide a 6 acre tract into one lot for the
purpose of constructing an apartment complex. The tract is zoned for .
Planned Development'(RD) and has been amended to permit a total of 116
apartment units. The parcel of land begins 420' west of Stuart Road and
runs along the north side of the'proposed Windsor Drive extension.
Appropriate utility and drainage; easements have been met; and no street 4=
'improvements are necessary.' Utility and drainage plans are satisfactory
for the development of the site, ,
t
The Planned Development (PD) zoning ordinance'which includes this, tracts
requires a 4' sidewalk be constructed on the north side of Windsor. Drive,
along the property frontage from Stuart Road to the end of the apartment
complex, prior to completion of the complex.
RECOMMENDATION:-
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the plat and unanimously recom-
mended approval at itr August 16, 1979 meeting, The Planning, Engineering,
and Utility Departments have each reviewed the plat and recommended approval.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The City Council should move to approve the final subdivision plat of The
Village, Phase III,'
. a
EXHIBITS:
b Map
4
I
. t
P
bi.,w.....-. rrec.w.a.:liEtatrf, malarv+,»..
I
0 It
i I s
19 SI 9KS 207. 2022 1 12
® IN I 1 -
1 I ITOL9 201.8 201.1 10!.11
.
t
AMA4,
t a
te~
11
1 BLOCK f .
• LOT
f N~f f ? 1)R~~ I
I9
"Mr- ~%osoft
y( rrrr ~
f wr rr 3 ~
Qum Pup "&L'IligmigAggl"
I
00Y
THE- VILLAGE
rim...,..,, I
o "Ail nl- lot I-WN i ,
Y A suetlIVISIC~I IM h4f CIYd QFf nIhITnM
D[t1M COUNTY, MA4 '
NASH CORPORATION j
i C0141MINd twowit"
` tau
l.IOViS1AMk A1iAMU1 Of MhIri11NM
. • . _ r...... O'm Its IAl.V.. #*A;-r LIr 1'• ICO
eAii I n Itr i1iY IT ,Iii. ao. 10,238
City of Denton
Memorandum
September 41 1919
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider disposition of property at the intersection of Bell Avenue and
Sycamore Street.
STAFF REPORT ON THE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF THE SITE:
This site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Bell
and Sycamore Street. The tot is roughly 6,000 square feet in size
Avenue about ,44 feet of frontage on Bell Avenue and 25 feet of frontage
havionng Sycamore Street (see attached site plan). The property is zoned Com-
mercial (C). The commercial zone requires a 251 front yard setback and
no side yard or rear yard setbacks. As indicated by the site plan, a
commercial acanubeddevelopedhon th0isssiteeandemeet theezoningtOrdinance d
G
requirements.
The development of the site in this manner would require at least one curb
cut on Bell Avenue. A second curb cut on the Sycamore Street--west corner--
of the property might also be necessary, depending on the manner in which
if
this site is developed. A curb opening on 5yycamore property should along be the avoided, street.
possible, because of the short frontage of the If at least one curb opening is permitted to the property along Bell Avenue,
it is the staff opinion that the property is -independently developable.
i 9/
EXHI
a Memo
b} Site Plan
I
j
r,
` 1 r I 1 ~ ` i ~ f t 1~ r r 1 E
j 144!
~1
~ •1 ~ j ~ L. ~ ~ + ~ = _t.~ ~ ~ _ ~ is ~ r ~ • - - -
114. t
- 71-1
L.f
~ i. ~ ~ l•i ~ ~ ~ } , ~ t r!.. ~ ~ ~ : ! I ' t_, f 1 i -t f -1 r~-[- tt,
71
Ti
1 I 1 1i t
4 44
_ E- - .L.I. _ r' l-
- - -
_
_ - r r
G.
Miami
City of Denton
Memorandum
September 4, 1979
AGENDA 1TEM:
Consider annexation of approximately 1500 acres extending from the present
city limits to 600' north of the center line along the entire length of
proposed North Loop 288,
SUMMARY:
The Council has asked the staff to investigate the feasibility of annexing
a large area in north Denton in order to maintain certain control over
development. The issue has arisen as a result of proposals to construct
apartments in the area.
LEGAL ISSUES:
3
t
State law permits a home rule city, on its initiative, to annex a total
of 10% of its current land area per year. The city is approximately
21,000 acres now, so we do have the authority to annex the 1500 acre.
area in north Denton. }
The law requires that a city provide newly annexed area government services
"the standard and scope of which are substantially equivalent to the stan-
dard and scope of government and proprietary services furnished by the city
in other areas of the city which have characteristics of topography, pat-
terns of alnd utilization, and population density similar to that of the
a articular area annexed." Services can be provided to this area, if it is
A) Utilities: The Utility Director feels that there are no special ob-
stacles to providing water, sewer, and electrical service to this area
as it develops. Since the great majority of the area is in the Cooper
Creek watershed, lift stations or major Interceptor lines will not be
needed to provide sewer service to most of the area. There is adequate
capacity in the water and sewer tines leading to the plant to accomo-
date growth in this area. As in other parts of the city, utilities
will be provided only as areas are developed and the developer extends
those lines.
B) Fire and Police Protection: Bocause the area is sparsely populated now,
both the Fire and Police Chiefs feel that providing service will result
in only a very small increase in their work load . As the area develops
there wtI be a need for a fire substation in the northwest part of j
the city.
C) Public Works: There is very little existing roadway in the area proposed
for annexation that is not under the state system. Road maintenance
requirements for this area will be minimal. Solid waste collection
can be provided to the few residents of the area,
••-•••:'....w ur sw,A.4ilY..i wY M.da'I
.!`.1,YM'Ki~y'•eFi.WiAl..A py :.:rv v.
I
2
D) Parks: North Lakes Park will meet the recreation needs in the north-
west section of Denton. There is a need for additional park development
in the northeast now, and that need will become more urgent if there is
significant development in the area to be annexed.
FISCAL ISSUES:
It is diffucult to gage the fiscal impact of annexation of this area because
of the recent amendments in the State Tax Law. The Peveto Bill provides
that an owner can petition to have agricultural property taxed at its in-
come producing value rather than its market value. It is uncertain how
n property owners will qualify or decide to apply and what their tax
liability
It is our judgment, because there are no special problems in providing
service to this area, that tax revenue would offset the cost of providing
services.
PLANNING ISSUES:
A) Growth Pattern: if we continue our current annexation and utility
policies, annexation will not have an important impact on the city's
growth pattern. That is, annexation will not mako it more likely
I or less likely that this area would develop rather than another sec- ;
tion of the city.
Our current utility policy, of course, is to require developers to
extend services to their development. Our annexation policy has been
E to approve annexation requests by the property owner. These requests
I are usually made at the time of development.
B) Development standards. The purpose of this contemplated annexation
is to maintain complete control over the development of this 1500
} acres. This area would likely be annexed as Agricultural (A) which
would mean that the Council would normally have to approve both a
change in zoning, as well as a subdivision plat before any development
took place, Obviously annexation, in itself, would not resolve the
question of how this area should be developed. Annexation will give
the Council complete development review powers.
The staff strongly supports the use of our annexation powers to control j
! development on the perimeter of the city, During the 10's the city
has extended annexation strips, along nearly all the major roads
leading out of the city, expressly to maintain development control.
This action will help us avoid the type of poor quality strip devel-
opment that has taken place on the boundaries of many cities. The
staff also believes strongly that any significant development that is
proposed on the perimeter of the city should be annexed for the pur-
pose of land use control to ensure quality development standards.
Even though we do feel that development immediately outside the city
should be controlled through annexation, we are not certain lm-ediate
annexation of this 1500 acre tract is required to accomplish this.
We do ahve 500 foot wide strips along most of the major streets in
1
i
i
;
fI~
I
a
YY
3
i
this area. We also have the power to review subdivision plats in this
area through our extra- territorial jurisdiction. It probably is possible
to develop legal mechanisms or procedures to give the Council the op-
portunity to annex any property proposed for significant development
before that development can take place. This possibility would require
' some legal research to pin down.
' Of course, the most direct and most certain method to cortrol develop-
ment is through immediate annexation. The planning staff does not have
a strong opinion concerning the question of whether immediate annexation
or annexation in response to development proposal is the ppreferable
alternative. We do feel that one alt to ensure r native should bedevosen a nt.
that we use our annexation as
C) Comprehensive Planning: Even though the land use question is not neces-
sarily connected with the annexation issue, it should be discussed.
The Comprehensive Plan provides that the northeast section of Denton,
e areas on the perimeter of the city, be
th
as well as most of the o
n
reserved for low density residential use. The only major exception
Is the southwest area near the airport which was indicated for indus-
trial uses. The land use plan was developed under the assumption
j that the long trend toward apartment development was going to slow and
that for the future, 70% of the housing units would be single family
and 30% would be multi family units.
f ` The fact is that for the past 20 years, 60% of the housing units built
in Denton were multi family units. The staff would foresee. for the
future that 50% to 60% of the units built will continue to be multi
family (apartments, duplexes, condominiums). Today, we have roughly
7,000 multi family units in Denton. The Housing Study indicates a {
need for on additional 41000 multi family units in the next six years.
The Comprehensive Plan is not adequate to address this growth issue,
nor is it adequate to address the changing function of multi family
housing. Until recently, apartment development has been closely
linked with the expansion of the two universities. Nearly all the
multi family units built until the 1970's were constructed in large
concentration around the universities. Clearly, multi family housing
has become the alternative choice or the only alternative for many
familiestypes atdifamifferenlytdevelland use overallglandnusehe
}
pattern.
Obviously, these issues affect the entire community and can only be
properly addressed on a city wide basis. We do have funding in our
new Community Development Grant to continue the Housingg Study com-
21,
pleted last year. The next shady should focus on multi family and
neighborhood preservation issues.
i
EXHIBITS:
a) Memo ,
b Maps
i
I
r
L AREA ppRRpp ppSSEEDD Ep
ANNEXATION R
1 l?
3 ~
i
e
t
$ 7 AK
rr y
J 7
Ira
{
I N
r r +
F r
/bL W
r i
I
~f
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUOJECTs Receive and Consider Request from Jess Coffey Regarding water
and Sewer Service on Nortt Sherman Drive
SUNMARYt
Mr. Coffey has requested water and sewer service for his property
located between North Sherman Drive and North Stuart Road. This
property is not incorporated into the City of Denton. However,
this area har been certified to the City of Denton by the Public
Utility Commission.
He has expressed that he will most all water and Sewer Utility ex-
tension ordinances and regulations which essentially are that the
developer shall install all water and sewer lines in this development
and extend offsite water and sewer lines to the nearest available
point.
FISCAL SUMMAM
Y, Ty
Normal annual water and sewer line maintenance and servi:e costs.
Fire Hydrant maintenance costs.
No participation costs anticipated.
'ACTION REQUIREDs
Approval or disapproval of request for service.
ALTERNATIVES
Approval
It has been a policy of past councils to deny water and Sewer service
to unincorporated areas except in unusual circumatantes, and ap-
proval would be a reversal of this past policy.
Disapproval
this may be in violation of Public Utility Commission regulation which
state that a Utility is obligates to provide service to a customer
providing the customer meets all vxtenaion polioies. A,
RECOMMENDATIONS
pp i
The Public Utility Board at their meeting on 8/1/19 approved Mr. 9
Coffey's request by a vote of 3 ayes, two abstentions.
' J
R. E. Nelson, P.E.
Director of Utilities
i
i
ilk
t
City of Denton
Memorandum
August 21, 1979
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider the final plat of the Golden Triangle Industrial Park, Phase III.
SUMMARY:
Aboui a year ago the petitioner received Light Industrial (LI) zoning clas-
sification on a 165 acre tract between Loop 288 and Mayhill Road in order
to develop an industrial park. There was an approved preliminary plat on
i the property and two sections have received final plat approval.
The property in this request for subdivision is located at the intersection
of East McKinney and Mayhili Road. The plat includes three lots, two of E
which front McKinney and one fronts Mayhill..
STAFF REPORT:
The proposed subdivision can be served by an existing sewer line and a
6" water line will be extended to serve the lots. Property can be served
from the street with power. The plat meets the other subdivision require- 4
ments with the exception of paving half (171) of an adjoining street ?
Mayhili The petitioner feels that is unnecessary because part of the road
is outside of the city ltksits and should not be required as a part of his
I~ subdivision, The engineering staff feels strongly that paving this street {
Is necessary for the proper function of the subdivision and is required by
4 the subdivision ordinance. The engineering report is attached,
'F
~ RECOMMENDATIOR: ;
j The Planning Commission considered this plat at their regular meeting on
August 15. The Commission recommended that the plat be approved and the
Council be informed that this approval is given with reservations con- 3
cerningg the paving or nonpaying of the road adjoining the property- f
Mayhill. Motion made by La Forte, seconded by Gilchrist, and carried
with a vote of four to two (4.2)
EXHIBITS:
4 I
D) MMeme from Director of Public Works, Rick Svehla
c) Copy or Viat I
i
1
I
i
i
yt'
J f r l
1 $4 11
.11 ' ~~/f I ~ ~ ~ f rr~ •
V / f
to of
y I J
61
ff / I I
I `•e2-•is1,'r • 1771x•
:s .h t
!f~ ?IS ales
I/ f. P/ f 1
1 I
W. 01
1 `
1
GOLDEN TRIANGLE i
INDUSTRIAL PARK
PHASE III
4
5• ,
41
{
0"o"i
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 382.4601
MEMORANDUM
i
TO: Council
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: August 16, 1979
RE: Paving of Adjacent Streets in Subdivisions
A
In the past on large subdivisions, the City Staff has always recommended that
adjacent streets to subdivisions be paved half way as the subdivision developes.
The Golden Traingle Industrial Park was no exception. I've attached two letters
which have been dated over the last year which had indicated to the developer
that Mayhill Road would have to be paved as the industrial park developed. Cur-
rent examples of subdivisions where we are requiring this are: Kings Row, which I
is adjacent to Kingston Trace subdivision; Hercules Lane and Stuart Road, which
is adjacent to Royal Acres, Willowwood West, which is adjacent to Willowwood, and
Bonnie Brae, which is adjacent to the Percy Christain subdivision (Skaggs-Albert- ?
son development). We have done many more subdivisions Just like this since at 3
least 1973.
Over the last year or so, the Staff in some instances, has recommended that the I
t
street not be paved but be assessed to the owner at a later time. This type of
recommendation usually occurs because of one or more of these reasons:
p
(1) the lots along the street are totally developed, with the exception of
one or two lots and the street has been scheduled for an assessment program.
(Example: the three let.Wilson Addition on Paisley Street).
111 3
(2) the plat or subdivision is a very small one and has a small amount of frontage
on a street and the traffic that is generated will be minimum. (Example: the
Alton 0,vils plat on Mockingbird), b
The Staff has recommended that one half of Mayhill be paved because we feel as
more and more of the subdivision is platted, more and more truck traffic will be
generated on Mayhill. At the present time, the road section on Mayhill does
not rrk: t the City standards, The Staff feels that as the industrial park develops
more and more traffic will be generated, and more maintenance will be required 1
to maintain the street. The Staff feels that by paving the street, maintenance
costs will be re0ced substantially. We feel that the burden of maintenance should
be paid for by those that cause it, (i.e. the developer of the subdivision). There-
fore, we feel that the developer should share in the cost of the maintenance by
paving the street and thus eliminating the maintenance. The subdivision ordinance
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
i
memo to the Council
August 16, 1978 i
I
allows the City to require paving of adjacent streets regardless if they are in '
the City limits or not.
J
j1
1
i
i
A
4
I
5 i' 1
p
I
4
~ ter
~I
~1
k,
1
c1rY of oNroN, ryas MUN ClPAL BUILDING / DENTON, 7ENAS 76201 I TELEPHONE (811) 382.9601
March 2, 1979
Mr. e'rank Martino
P. 0. Box 2306
Penton, Texas 76201 .
Dear Mr. Martinoe
i;
This letter will discuss your subdivision proposal concerning the final
plat of the Martino Addition:
a) Water service for this development will be. provided by tapping the
existing water line in Mayhill and East McKinney Streets
~t
b) Sewer plans for the extension of a line along MAyhill and East McKinney,
E to the westernmost edge of the proposed plat,appear satisfactory for
serving the lots in this development--with the exception of a minor
adjustment to the grade calculations; i
t
c) Electricity service will be provided from the street;
4
d) Five (3) pro rata street lights will he required for this development.
e) Property dedication shown for Mayhill Road right-of-way is adequate. y
Paving for 17' of street and one side of curb and guttee will be re- y
quired along the Mayhill-fronting property, unless some other arrangs-
j went is made.
I There are also came minor modifications necessary for the field notes; and
i have communicated these and the grade changes on the seweit line to Dave
Isbell. In order to be consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat of
the Colden Triangle Industrial Park, I have asked Mr. Isbell to title this
the Final Plat of Phase II, Golden Triangle Park Addition.
The Plarning Commission will consider approval of the final plat of the
If I can pro-
Golden Triangle Park Addition, Phase it, on lurch 7, 1979.
vide ary n'. di ional nssistAnce iii this or any other matter, please contact
me. i
Sincerely, 1
Sam A. Listi
Assistant City Planner
SAL/kre
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A
i
'CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILD?.'4G / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 382- 9601
July 17, 1978
` Mr. Frank Martino
P. 0. Box 2306
Denton, Texas 76201,
Dear Mr. Martino,
o-' This letter is in reference to our conversation of July 14 concerning your
preliminary plat for an industrial park on Loop 288: The staff is in
agreement with your proposed street system. The right-of-way for the
interior streets will be 60 feet and the street will be paved 44 feet wide
as adjoining property is platted: You will be required to dedicate a 60
foot right-of-way for Mayhill Road ani pave 17 feet. The city will pay
oversize costs on Mayhill. The dedict•tion and paving of Mayhill will be
phased with the development of the overall industrial ppark. The section
of Mayhill between Pecan Creek and McKinney street will be completed as
the adjoining property develops. The section of Mayhill between Pecan
i Creek and your proposed drainage easement will be comppleted when the pro-
perty along Loop 288 is substantially platted or developed. The section
of Mayhill from the drainage easement south to your property will be com-
pleted when your property on the Mayhill side is substantially platted
or developed.
The alignment of the proposed drainage system appears satisfactory, however,
we will need to review your plans to determine if it is.properly engineered.
I We will require dedications of all necessary drainage easements with the
final plat and the existing flood plain must appear on the final plat. r
! As we discussed, we are asking that a 50 foot building line be observed
along Loop 288 and along Mayhill, and that buildings front on the interior
street system. An explanation of utility requirements is attached to this
letter. '
This is a summary of the staff recommendation. The Planning Commission
must review and approve your preliminary plat before ;t is formally accepted.
If 1 can pr^.:idefurtrerexplanation, please do not hesitate to call.
t
i
Sincerel ,
John Lavretta
City Planner
• f
JL/ks
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
~r~~d s•
1 i
.i
CITY ofDENTONrTEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)382.9601
July 17, 1978
N
t
RE: proposed industrial site
Loop 288, Denton, TX.
ATTN: Mr. Frank Martino
' This letter is to verify the agreement made on Friday, July 14, 1978
With you, Bob Nelson; Director of Utilities and myself. Concerning
r the water aria sewer system in your industrial site; Bob and I agreed
to follow your plan on the sewer line from Mayhill Road through your
property to Spencer Road. With the sewer line being an 18" and laid s
on a grade that would serve the property from Spencer Road down Loop T
288 to 1-35 E. You will be required to ask for bids on a 10" and
18" line from three qualified contractors, which would need to be 4
approved by the City of Denton Utility Department, you will need
a
to pay for the 10" line and the City will pay the difference between
the 10" and 18". There should be a 10" sewer line extended on one of
the east west streets out to Loop 288.
The 8" water line is fine as planned, except it should be extended'on
both of the east west streets out to Loop 288. It is exceptable for
i this extension to be made in more thAn one phayq,
i If we may be of any further assistance or if you have any questions,
i please feel free to contact us.
y
Sincerely,
Earl E. Jones
Water 6 Sewer Supt.
City of Denton
i
t
4
W
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: August 30, 1979
RE: Requirement to Pave Adjacent Streets in New Subdivisions and the
Council's Request for a Review of our Current Policy
The Staff has reviewed, in detail, the policy as it now stands and we feel
that it is adequate. We feel in general that the developer should be re-
sponsible for the paving if he is to generate the traffic and only in a few
extreme cases should the paving requirements be waived. .
In looking at changes to the policy, the Staff could only find two alternatives,
namely: assessment at a later date or the City financing the total construction. +
Currently, on the larger thoroughfares or arterials, the City does participate
in new construction. In new developments, the City picks up any costs associated
with the street that is over 34 feet in width. This policy is carried out on all
streets that are designed to be major streets in the 174 Comprehensive Plan. If
j the developers needs require larger streets or if he wishes to build larger streets
to enhance his own development, he does so totally at his own cost. The funds for
the additional construction, which the City pays for, is budgeted every year in
} the Street Department budget. For fiscal year 1979-80, we have budgeted $40,000.
ti dollars. If the City was to assume the total cost for paving streets, the expen-
ditures would be much larger. Currently, costs for a 30 foot residential street
are approximately $50. dollars per lineal foot. Using the Golden Triangle Indus-
trial plat as an example, the increased cast to the City would be approximately
$20425,000. dollars. As you can see, this approach would require more funds to
be budgeted for this operation or we would have to look at some sort of bond pro-
gram to obtain funds. If the Council adopted this type of policy, this same
! question may arise for subdivisions that are already underway. Our cost for these
{ a projects, if included, would be substantially over our budgeted amounts.
The second alternative was some sort of assessment procedure. This type of pro-
cedure would allow the developer to plat the lots and then sell them to new
owners. At some later point the City would initiate an assessment program and
assess these new owners for a part or the total cost of construction. If this
type of procedure is adopted by the Council, the Staff could recommend that we
r try to give an much notice of this future assessment to potential buyers. We
would suggest doing this in two manners, first, some sort of notice or statement
of this future assessment would be placed on the plat which would be filed at
the courthouse. Secondly, we would recommend that this same sort of statement
be placed on the City's tax records. We feel that by doing,this,,there would }
be a good chance that title companies and financial institutions would be able
to obtain this information for the potential buyer. In this way, the buyer
a4
y.
rt;
a
l
4
Page Two
Memo to the Council
would be able to plan for this additional cost in his financial operations in
the future without severe imparement.
The Staff has reservations about both of these alternatives. We feel that the
first alternative would affect the residents of the whole city in that they would
r.. share in the cost of providing services for new developments. This may not be
equitable in most situations. The second alternative removes the financial barden
from the developer's shoulders and places it on buyers of the developed property.
In most cases this would probably be more equitable than the first alternative.
In this case the new owner who generates the need for these services would at
least partially pay for them. If the Council wishes to change our current policy,
the Staff would recommend this new assessment policy. 0.
i
.
f
I
t
I
1 •t
J
Vq
f{
i
3
Y.
ti
j r
A4.
CITY 01 JENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
s
FROM: King Cole, Assistant City Manager
DATE: August 301 1979
SUBJECT: plans and Specifications for Central Fire Station
and Airport Improvements. a
i
The architect for the central Fire Station and the engineer
for Airport Improvements will be at the Council meeting on
September 4th with copies of the plans and specifications
on-their respective projects. Frank Medanich with First
Southwest Corporation will also be there with the necessary
a, resolutions indicating our intent to issue certificates of
obligation. Frank is going to try to mail the resolutions
directly to the Council members so that they will have an i
opportunity to see them prior to the Council meeting, b
t
We do have some flexibility on proceeding with central Fire
Station, but it is crucial that the plans and specifications
on the Airport Improvements be approved Tuesday night. The
reason this is crucial is that the FAA must have this project
under grant prior to the end of the fiscal year or we lose
the furling.
3
i
KC:gd
i
I
i
i
I
i
I
t
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager it
FROM; King Cole, Assistant City Manager
i
DATE: August 30, 1979
E SUBJECT: plans and Specifications for Central Fire Station
and Airport Improvements.
1 ,
The architect for the central Fire Station and the engineer
for Airport Improvements will be at the Council meeting on
September 4th with copiEs of the plans and specifications
on.their respective projects. Frank Medanic with First
Southwest Corporation will also be there with the necessary
resolutions indicating our intent to issue certificates of
obligation. Frank is ggoing to try to mail the resolutions
directly to the Council members so that they will have an opportunity to see them prior to the Council meeting.
We do have some flexibility on proceeding with central Fire
Station, but it is crucial that the plans and specifications
on the Airport Improvements be approved Tuesday night. The
reason this is crucial is that the FAA must have this project
under grant prior to the end of the fiscal year or we lose `F
the funding.
j
KC:gd
I
3
i
I
i
f
i
~i
it
owl
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: Kiug Cole, Assistant City Manager
6
DATE: August 30, 1979
t
SUBJECT: Plans and Specifications for Central Fire Station
a
and Airport Improvements.
The architect for the central Fire Station and the engineer
for Airport Improvements will be at the Council meeting on
September 4th with copies of the plans and specifications
on.their respective projects. Frank Medanich with First
Southwest Corporation will also be there with tb3 necessary
resolutions indicating our intent to issue certificates of
obligation. Frank is going to try to mail the resolutions
directly to the Council members so that they will have an
opportunity to see them prior to the Council meeting,
We do have some flexibility on proceeding with central Fire
Station, but it is crucial that the plans and specifications
on the Airport Improvements be appproved Tuesday night. The
reason this is crucial is that the FAA must Lave this project g
under grant prior to the end of the fiscal year or we lose
l the funding.
I
KC:gd
a
P
i
tt
I
i
I
i I
I
i
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
T0: Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: King Cole, Assistant City Manager
i
DATE: August 30, 1979
!
SUBJECT: Plans and Specifications for Central Fire Station
! and Airport Improvements.
f
s
! o The architect for the central Fire Station and the engineer
I for Airport Improvements will be at the Council meeting on
September 4th with copies of the plans and specifications
on.their respective projects. Frank Medanich with First
Southwest Corporation will also be there with the necessary
resolutions indicating our intent to issue certificates of a
obligation. Frank is oing to try to mail the resolutions
& directly to the Council members so that they will hive an
opportunity to see them prior to the Council meeting.
r
We do have some flexibility on proceeding with central Fire
Station, but it is crucial that the plans and specifications
on the Airport improvements be approved Tuesday night. The }
I reason this is crucial is that the FAA must have this Me
under grant prior to the end of the fiscal year or we lose
the funding. }
s
.
t.
KING CU~E
1
KC:gd
I
a
{
II
I
{
j {
i
{ a_
III
CITY OF DENTON
Memorandum
September 4, 1979
AGENDA ITEM:
Consider bids for the Old Post Office Buildi:g, Bid 88665
SUMMARY:
In late 1978, the City Council, after reviewing a request from the Denton
County Community Council for use of the building, instructed the staff to
advertise the Old Post Office for bids and determine what the building is
really worth to the City. On February 16, 19791 three bids were received
ranging from $58,000 to $101,000. At that time a question was raised as
to the validity of the bids since they were substantially lower than the
$220,000 replacement cost value appraisal of the property. Also, further
discussion was held concerning the use of the building in light of its
historical significance and key location. Therefore, the property was
III re-bid adding the requirement of indicating the proposed use of the
j building. Two bids have now been received.
BID SUR4ARY:
V, The two bids are outlined on the bid summary sheet, The high bid is
$80,100 with no land use proposal. The second bid is for $78,000 with 4
an office/warehouse land use proposal.
ALTERNATIVES: A
1. Am pt the high bid
2, Re-bid the Old Post Office r
3. Retain the Building for possible future municipal, caamunity, or
unique private use,
< STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City staff is recommending that the City Council refect all bids and a
i hold the building for possible future use because:
1) recent building market value study by the staff and the bids them-
selves indicate the building has little market value above the land s
value itself.
2) The one bid with a proposed land use of office/warehouse, although
with some merit, does not on balance present a re-development use of
a dynamic or unique emphasis and is a land use type that the City
could most probably realize any time in the future,if it proved to be
the only alternative for the building use By rejecting these bids
and holding the building for some time, ail other alternative uses of y.
the building can be fully explored.
4>:
Sol
2
3) Since the City would in essence be selling only the land, it is sug-
gested that potential municipal or civic/private use could be of more
value to the City than is realized by the private market. Value to
the City in both tangible ways (i.e. use of the building) and less
tangible or measurable ways such as promoting civic activity, historic
preservation, unique community attraction (or business)$ and downtown
stimulus.
4) By holding the building, the only fiscal lossbto the City ttion he tax
loss of approximately $12000 p year,
If the Council chooses to accept the bid it is suggested that the bid
{78,000} with the proposed land use be accepted and the bid accep'ance
be conditional upon the actual renovation to that use. This would assure 1
preservation of the building for historic purposes and assures the City
of its land use. Part of the bid proposal is the elimination of the side-
problem i with order to proposal,the parking
no special Street)
lot. space staff h would south see side (Pecan
` ACTION REpUIRED:
The Council should take action on the bids submitted. In order to follow ±
the staff recommendation, the Council should move to reject all bids.
EXHIBITS.,
a Bid Summary Sheet and copy of bid proposals
q bi Executive Summary of Building Market Value Study
{
f ~
R
xF
I
F
Z I
R 5
r
i
r
9
Bid Summary Sheet
it
1) Mr, Charles McNeill Purchase Price: $78,000
r
Land Use Proposal: Combination
Office and
Warehouse
Development
2) Mr, Jim Horn Purchase Price: $80,100
k land Use Proposal: None
a
t
'i
i
4.
f
r
i
i
I I
1
k
I
i
~ I
II
i
fAk.h-. y..... -w.wur•1 A43A4YkYTJ{y:~'t~~`!~#`!.~ly.rv.
I
I
JI
1
f
l
a or.r~
O n~ SID PROPOSALS page 1 of 9
C~h=~ a
M", D M
~N
Qa e 0 .
a rr„
oT~= the form indicated in this section. Responses
° Huey the information but should be as concise as
S^$ ^ or Reuse of the Property:
~,0 1=r tion is requested. Sketch illustrations may svp-
1a 0s.3. ! 0 escription, but are not required.
r a+P
.Y- 'tip # f (D The type and character of use or uses proposed
i PP1 "f bed.
M ti nt: Renxdeling, rehab Ifitatiba, or 'additions .
bed.
Ir t The way the site will be developed including
Z' ♦ access, and any tpecial amenities should.be
t. , z
j z D cial implications to the city is important and it
f oper's advantage to indicate significant financial
s ~1 X z precisely.
rl
{ 'hat is the expected increase in value of the pro- 1
ements after building renovation and related i
r ~ 1`:i~ Z ~ f6
tation of the Proposal:
I N
ection process is.based upon the proposal, It is
i 'eveloper implea,^nt the pproposal Therefore, 'the i
i 1 of the developer's willingness and ability to
opment plan.
I pp Lri Hrements: The City will require pdrformance of
r F o N the proposal by a separate agreement. What fea-•
o rposal will the developer agree to fulfill as a
c tract with the City? What features does he intend
y o feels unable to be bound to by :ontract because
^J :ainties? -
i aJ
l rbility: Indicate hov, your financial and organita- a
are adequate to carry out the proposal.
3. Development Schedule: Indicate the proiectdd schedule for devel-
opment of the property.
Pleata attach this format to your submitted proposal. i
i
I
in submitting the above bid, the vendor agrees that acceptance of any or an bid items by the City of Denton, Tern with;n a
reasonebts period of Lima constitues a contract. i
tare ti,dd:Y
w4''A e.Y,Ml1 qF:$.l flit }.p:, i 1;} r.,m
I
ws~xu•
d GYGS:LL r^0:. PUAi A3c Or' GLJ ~aP Cc':ICS UIiJIiQG
A. Concept for Reuse of the Property:
1. Uses Froposedi Approximately 7,920 ail, ft. for
rental office space and approximately 1,728 sq. ft*
of warehouse space for McNeill Furniture ~ Appliance
2, Building Treatments Conservation of present exterior
decor and landscaping with sand-blasting and repainting
of wooden portions and appropriate repairs. Extensive
interior remodeling and repairing. In this area, the
greatest worX will be done. First, the causes must be
ascertained and corrections made for the water leaks
which have been occurring and are presently noticeable.
.ill plumbing and wiring will be brought up to code as
well as extended to supply the utility requirements for
the expected tenants. The heating and cooling systems
for the building wi31 be studied and either renovated
or replaced as is deemed necessary. Tyheu main wfloor,
except the space intended f0 ..all
1 lowered ceilings, partitioned offices, ,r. paneling
and carpeting. We plan to construct four restrooms,
r: a supply room and a snaoK bar on this floor,
It is our desire to expand the present parking facilities
to its greatest potential. since the central business
district now suffers severe parting problez s: We mould f a
like to got city approval of our decreasing the 9 ft.
wide south sidewalk on Pecan Street to 9 ft, wide,
thereby giving us 6 more feat in the par:tirig lot and
adding 8 more parking spaces, We hope to provide 24
off-street parking spaces for tenants' use to well as
the 5 2-hour par".tins spaces in front of the building.
A general contractor has advised us that Converting
the present basement into parking space would be
unadvisable at this time. Further study here would
be needed, For the present, tha basement would be
used for storage space of the tenants, A baoK door
for access to the outside parking lot will be made
with a ramp for wheel chair users.
3, rinancl•il Factors,
1. Purohase Prices 478,000
2. City levenua: ':with expenditurts for renovation at
least as great as the purch4.ss price to provide an
` attractive onvirontent for crospective tanants, we 5
".opo to inor3asv.th3 value of th3 proparty by .t
vreatar 1q4r3e than our invectitnt. Cur otwn need 1
4 1
fhL. 4
j a 1Yl'
YW1k8iy
.xa+..a ,yY 1Rt r
r
2
for warehouse space should Improve our buying power
and increase our ability to compete with large chain
operations soon to ba located in our city. Each
tenant that we situate will, of course, bring addi-
tional revenue to the city.
C. Implementation of the Proposals
1. Contractual 3equirementss lie would be agreeable to
establishing the aforementioned office apace, warehouse
space and parking facilities on a separate contraot, T
excepting only the possible underground parking.
2. Developer's Capability: We hive recently done similar
remodeling and excavation on our present le6ation of
mcNeill Furniture & Appliance on a sub contract basis,
and have made arrangements with the First State Bank,
W. C. Orr, 3r., for both an interim loan during con- g
struotion and a note on completion.
I 3. Development Schedules Since it would be to our advantage
to implement our proposal as quickly as possible, lie
> would be anxious to undertake this project immediately
and hope to complete it within 6 months.
Date ,ne mat 1. 1970 Bidder
Title_ ownsr, ggyajil fern. k lpnlianna Signature
7
Y
p
i
l L,NA
6 Iri^K
' Ad.YrLR': i
1
I ~ ~ Ncl-ti = 1 O I, ~ „
o O R,
j r
I wnRr' H ousF ,I
3 7-
I
FAMP
MFV•i
RDDM w f
t I FADrt 3~~ t 1
roe; M
I
-z4 I t,
r
{
1' o ant
_ _ S!lfCK ~
1~ r
I
ba ,
„
s
z
{
i ' ny
K`!l lt~y1
BID NUMBER 8665 BID PROPOSALS Page 1 of S
i
Format for Proposal:
Proposals should follow the form indicated in this section. Responses
should be adequate to convey the infoiination but should be as concise as
possible.
A) Developers Concept for Reuse of the Property:
' Brief verbal description is requested. sketch illustrations may sup-
plement the verbal description, but are not required.
1. Uses Proposed: The type and character of use or uses proposed
should be described.
2., Building Treatment: Retradelfng, rehabilitation, or 'additions
should be described.
i 4
3. Site Development: The way the site will be developed including
parkinrg$ service access, and any special amenities should be
described.
D) financial factors:
I~
s The long range financial implications to the city Is important and it
will be to the developer's advantage to indicate significant financial
factors clearly and precisely.
t •1. Purchase Price
2. City Revenue: -What is the expected increase in value of the pro- 3
petty and improvements after building renovation and related ;
development?
C) beveluper's Implementation of the Proposal:
Since the City's selection process is based upon the proposal, it is
essential that the developer implement the Droposat. Therefore, the
City must be assured of the developer's willingness and ability to
carry out the development plan.
1. Contractual Requirements: The City will require pdrformance of
key features of the proposal by a separate agreement. What fea-•
tares of the proposal will the developer agree t,o fulfill as a
part of the contract with the City? WhaE features does he intend
to carry out but feels unable to be bound to by contract because
of market uncertainties? ,x
2. Developer's Capability: Indicate horr your financial and organiza.
tional strength are adequate to carry out the proposal.
3. Development schedule: Indicate the prtjectdd schedule for devel
opment of the property.
s:
Please attach this format to your submitted proposal.
r
In submitting the atwve bid, the vendor agrees that accoptahee of any or all bid items by the City of Denton, Texas within a
feasonable perlod of lima constitun a contract,
bate Bidder
~
a=- Sgpialtote
y,
a.cccv
August Is 1979
VX. John Mars al1i Director Depart=s
Purchasing Department,
215 East ItKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Marshall:
Reference your bid number 8665 the following Proposal is
submitted:
A. Investment, development, or resale.
S. 1, $80,100.00
2. Dependent on development. q
C. 1. a. Investment or resale.
b. Development.
2. Reference granting of attached bid bond (i.e. Bonding 7
company's evaluation of financial strength of bidder,).
3. As dictated by market de and.
f This bid is submitted by John Horn, et al, a
a
i
1 PARTNER: John Horn PARTNER- Jim Horn
P. 0, Box 1643 1806 Soutbridge
Denton, Texas 76201 Denton, Texas 76201
i
i
I
s I
I
I
i
MM4
.--.zs,. ,...w-•-
•rR ;r-1,777-1
7.7
AMERICAN STATES 1NSURANCE COMPANY
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA;
BID OR PROPOSAL BOND
LQAlCIWU BID OF $200,000.00 -
Know all Men by these Presents,;
`ai
That we,_....7ohn Horn
P. 0. Box 1643 Denton Texas
(hereinafter called the Peuieipal), as Principal, and AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY (hereinafter called the
a Surety), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto__ City of Derstony Texas
Five er cent o! the neatest amount f,~
.._._.._1~........._......._...._...H......_..__.___.... ,
(hereinafter called the Obligee) in the penal sum of bid
"Dollars tAa (}.A_8...,. for the palment of which the Principal ~I
and the Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly
and severally, firmly by these presents.
SIGNED and SEALED this..-__.lst .._.-__day of __August-W~__w _ _-I9 74 . j1
THE CONDITION Of THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, wherets the Principal
~
has submitted or is about to submit a proposal to the Obligee on a contract for Purchase of
old Post Office Bldg Qeaton, Sexe s_ 76201
NOW, THEREFORE, if the said contract be timely awarded to the Principal and the Pr'ind
pal shall; within such time as may be specified, enter into the contract in writing, and give bond, if ll
bond be required, with surety acceptable to the Obligee for the faithful performance of the said con`
tract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. S
John Horn
» ....._r . _ t
AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
Pam 1.1071 . Sy__-----
eao ..Robert ,T ~'Zas. Atwmeyin.Fat I1
a
~.SF""^ ~"v.,'.wq~.,,,i~7rr.Iaiskt{.d~'~5.; ~ra18hA~•r'+MEFkT.9. ~"'r''`... ....t.np
I
i
i
I
ti
I
s GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY t
American States Insurance Company
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
II
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, Thal American States Insurance Company, a Corporalion duly or armed and existing
under the laws of the State of Indiana, and haying AI pr~nclpal office in the City Of Indianapolis, Indiana, hath made, constdul
and appointed, and does by them presents make, constitute and appoint
_ ----ROBERT J. ESTES$ J. C. STERLINt3,_SHIRLEY NEVIL AND LANA THOMAS .
(Jointly or Sevetaijr)
of Dallas and Slate of .-Texas
Its true and lawful AttororAil•In•Fact, with full or and euthoriltyy hereby conferred In its name, place am stead, to o-ute,
acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, recognitances, contracts of Indemnity and other conditional or obligatory undertakings,
provided, however, that the penal sum of any one Such insttvment executed hereunder I
shall not exceed FIVE KbNDRED THOUSAND AND N01100 ($500,000.00) DOLIARS
and to bind the Corporation there DtJr as futtr and to the same Potent as if such bands were signed by the President, sealed with the
common $eal of the Corporation and duly attested by IN Secretary, hereby ratifyi sg and confirming nil that the said Amenn1lis
Fact may do Tn the premises. This Power of Attorney is executed and may be revoked pursuant to and by authority Ira by
Section 7,07 of the Illy-Laois of the American Slates Insurance Company, which reads as follows,
"The Chairman of the Board, the President or any Vice-President shalt have powar, by and with the concurrence'
with the Secretary of any Assistant Secretary W the Corporatioh to Ap nt Resident Vice-Praddants, Resident
Assistant Secretaries and Attorneys-1n-Fact as the business of the Corpora on may require or to authorize any one of
such persons 10 erecute, on behalf of the Corporation, any bonds, r-cogniaances, stipulations and undertakings,
tr whether by way of turety or otherwise"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ameridn States Insurance Company has cau"J these presents to be signed by its ViMPretiderit,
attested by its Assistant Secretary and its corporate seat to be herelo affixed this 5th day of _October _
r
t-!
a` A. D. 1978
AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
a
IsEAU By William M. Evans
{ ATTEST, Thomas No Ober !.cone vk. Presleenl
Axw pool secretary
P STATE OF INDIANA SS: r
COUNTY OF MARION}
' On this -.,Stb-. _ day of -.---October A. D, 19.X.8._, before me I""lly cane
g. _ William M. Evans, , torte knave who
being by me duly sworn, acknowledged the execution of the above instrument and did deppoose and toy; that he is Vice-President of
American States Insurance Companyl that he knows the seat of said Cot Orataonl that de seal affixed to the said InStrunrnt is
such corporate seat; that i t was s o b ffoad by -seder of the Board of Directors of said Corporationl and that he signed his fttNne
f thereto by tike order. And said WilliaM H.. Evans further said that he Is acpualnted with . ThOmae_M1 Ober
and knows him lo be the Assistant Secretary of said Corporation; and that he executed the above instrument s
s 7
Qa4tsA.[►
„ . Li11da J. ry Fulik
Ja>ure t~sm h Rif r 1ro, R'- . Nah
STATE OF INDIANA SS:
COUNTY OF MARION }
1, _ Thomas_M ,Ober _ , the Assistant Secrelary of AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY,
do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Power of Attorney, executed by srid AMERICAN
STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, which is still In full face and effect
This Certificate may be signed and sealed by lacsim,fe under and 6 the authority of the following resolution of the Board of
Directors of American States Insurance Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th do of Deeembat 1972.
"RESOLYEDi That the use of a primed facsimile of the corporate seal of the company and of the 1%aature of an Assistant a
Secretary on any certifiutior. of the correctness of a copy of an instrument executed blithe President or s Yict•Presidenl rursuant
to Section 7.07 of the 8 -Laws appointing and author41ng an Attorney In-Fact to sign in the name and on behalf of the company
furaly bads, underwriting undertakings or other instruments described in said Section 7A7, with like effect as if such 141111' and
such signature had been manually allixed and made, hereby is authorized and approved."
i' In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and aM'ued the seal of said Corporation, this _rtet
August 79
day of A. 0., 19_. P
ISCAL)
rs,r„ s•tafl if a•tal Anbum Sentlary t
f
is
Date: August 300 1979
Council Agenda Item 1
Subject: Consider authorizing Freese and Nichols to egin treatment ngineerinant
for Liquid Alum and Sodium Hydoxi plant
facilities.
` SL*MY: The water treatment plant for the past year has had under study
a plan to modify the water treatment process at the water
plant, The treatment plant uses dry aluminum sulphate
{Alum-A, Z(SOOJ) as a coagulant to aid in settling out
suspended part cles in the water. Alum is most effective when
the pH of the water is 6.0 to 7.5. Alen itself caused the
to drop to or below 7. Lime (CaO) is then added to bring the
i pH above 7 which conditions the water to be less corrosive on
our water distribution system.
We have always had a mild problem in our water treatment process
whereby, part of the alum stays In solution and passes through the
sand filters to the distribution system. The alum then precipitates
small white
V' out in
flakes ineourstdomestic nsersystem and shows vi a water. We ubelieverthee main causes of
the alum staying in solution are:
C 1) i valves above optimum level in the floculation and sediment
tlsins and
2) insufficient mixing of the alum into the water floculation
basins.
i
i Using a liquid alun will aid in dispensing and mixing of the alua in s
the floculation basins. Using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as
control after the floculation and sedimentation basins will lp in
maintaining the 6.0 to 7.5 pH in these basins during ooggelation and
sedimentation, Freese and Nichols, Inc. did a brief c stixly last year
I of using sodium hydroxide as a pH control rather than quick lime
and concluded that sodium hydroxide would better serve our
P
requirements,
We have two other significant problems that will be solved by
chanting to liquid alum vs dry alum.
(1) We presently have insufficient storage space to meet state
requirements of having one month supply of alum on hand.
(2) We will need to replace the 24 year old worn but alua feeder
r machinery within the next 3 years.
f
e,
s
r;
3.xvtr
1
i
Additional advantages that will be derived from this change in
process will be:
A. Change in dry alum system to liquid alum system.
1). Eliminate need to replace worn out alum feeders.
2) . Savings of $17,000 per year in alun costs due to lower cost
of liquid vs dry alum.
3). Reduction of labor costs for unloading, storing, handling
and cleaning required with the dry alum.
B. Chango in quicklime pH control to sodium hydroxide.
1). Elimination of 32S,000 pounds per year of lime sludge to the
wastewater treatment plant.
2). Eliminate need to replace worn out lime siakers and feeders
at an estimated cost of $127,000.
FISCAL 9-*MY:
Acquisition or Replacement Cost: New System Present System Savings
Sodium Hydroxide vs Lime Facilities $470150 $127,075 $79,97S
Liquid vs Dry Alum Facilities 21
j
TOTAL yde,2d 5 3~►
Annual Operating Expense. _
Sodium Hydroxide vs Lime Facilities $43,886 $61,273 $17,387
Liquid vs Dry Alva FacilitiAL 1* 981 1~7 00 7 81 TOT I
► ► ►
SOURCE OF FUNDS
1978-79 Budgeted for New Lime Feeders $40,000
1978.79 Budgeted for New Chlorine Rack 100000
1979-80 Budget _ 18 42S
TOTAL SbEf4Z3 f
The acquisitions costs are based on late 1978 estimates and therefore
costs may be more when final design and bids are complete. {
a
ACTION REWIRED:
Authorize the staff to direct Freese and Nichols, Inc., to begin
engineering for subject facilities under their general engineering
contract with the City and authorize staff to advertise for bids when S
design Is complete.
.
i
,~,y,,,..,._ _ •,,c..'«,uwvaa.w a.f.P~FS.ia.c"o-"....-,.. .,,.......,,.p
I
I
I
I
Recommendation:
Ili The Public Utility Board, at their August 29, 1979 meeting,
recommended approval of subject actions and of the request of sign i dvertise for ebidsn upon Nichols, , of the design work.
rk and
a
I
Respectively,
k
R. E. Nelson
I
:r
I
1 '
I
6
1s 4
a
i
S
i
plwr»°-.-... _ ..._...,..,,..a.k~wyl;y.~~.: • ilaa~yya¢rm,,,•,,.,..,.~.,._.... _......_,•.,a,,..
Ilk
I
i '
CITY OF DENTON
MEMOILA NDUM
i
DATE OF MEETING: September 4, 1974
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA),
Consider payment to Freese and Nichols for work done on proposed landfill sites.
~ i1 1
x.,
SUMMARY:
r
Attached is a bill for work done in the early part of 170. These were the last
sites that the Council considered. We have reviewed the changes and we believe
the bill should be paid.
FISCAL SUMMARY, {
t
This payment should be made frcei the sanitation operating fund. Funds are
available to accomplish this. The account number would be 01-36-65-02.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The Council should move to approve oaynnent.
I ~
'ALTERNATIVES,
i
Not to approve payment.
a
STAPP RECOMMENDATIONS,
The Staff recommends approval of payment.
i
I
MWIBITS, I - Invoice
r
I
ZI d AIIA
MOTION:
SECONDED:
ACTION:
71
i
•
i
i
I
Uri
rIwDN W rettu
JAM$$ A. NICHOIr
0011tl1T L. NICHOLS
AOrr RT O ,
P!<EESE AND NICDOES, II1f, L00IRT6 "
Ju MyIL L .oNtis NCr
? C O N I U L T I N 6 I N e I N 1 1 It 1 moor"' A, tHDwrwN m r:.
Jot E. MAP-96 k
OCIr C. ALLEN ;
August 11, 1979 W ANN,IT OLtMENT
' 1LVIN C. COPELAND
JOHN H, COOK
d Y. ANTHONY nO0
s AAt N. Artvtr `
Mr, Rick Svehlas P.E.
Director of Planning
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney St.
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: Land Fill Site Evaluation
Engineering Statement J
I Dear Rick: ,
As discussed with you by telephones the statement which yoe received
from Freese and Nichols dated August 8, 1979 in connection with land
j fill site evaluation services wes performed during the period December
1978 through March 1979 for Mr, Jack Owen.
The sites Investigated were designated as Nos
5 and b
are located
west of the Municipal Airport. Site No. 5 was owned by W, E. Penley
and No. 6 was owned by J. 0. Yarbrough.
We completed preliminary investigations and preparation of a plan for
development of the sites with cost %sti;.;ates and presented this pre-
liminary data to Mr. Jack Owen and Mr, Greg Anderson in Mr, Owen's
office on February 22, 1979. A copy of the Preliminary Report, maps,
soil boring logs, etc. which was presented to Mr. Owen is attached
for your information.
It was decided at that time by Mr. Owen and Mr. Anderson that we should
do no further work on these two sites. Our work sheets and work maps
were left with Mr. Owen for his review with the City Manager and were
later returned to us for our files by your office,
We believe the attached data will bring TI up to date on the work
performed on these two sites. Please ca11 if you need additional
clarification.
Yours very truly,
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
Elvin C. Copeland, PIE,
ECC:jm
Attachments
cc; Mr. Greg Anderson
VILt►HOHIt /I7 SSO•7161 Ift LAMAR •7RYtT PORT WORTH, 19AAN 74101
1
f;
tIMONW t11[CIL IL ` .1
G JAML! R. NIC T L NICH04 . htt
.
Uos0 ((,,P It .f
~t LL
J PAL )L' ONtt 000CN. , t.
FREESE AND NIC80b89 INC. Omni
.,I. ROltRT A. THCMISON III, ►.t.
C o N I U L T 1 N o t N A I N E E t s
Odt C. ALLtV ► 0,9
t,
W 9PINt/T CLtMtNT, P.R.
August 8, 1979 tLVNC, CO►CLANO,►,L
Ia JCNN N. COOT( ►,t.
1.S T ANTHONY Il i0, ►.tOAIIY N. Rttvtl, O.C. ,l
y~y
}
4 City of Denton
215 F. McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Attention: Mr. Greg Anderson `x'
Re: Landfill Site Evaluation ;
DTN 78197
Gentlemen:
We submit our statement for services during the period from December 1978
through March 31, 1979 in connection with the landfill site evaluation as
requested by Mr. Jack Owens during December 1978.
We have calculated the fee on the basis of Schedule of Charges, Miscellaneous
proJects, dated January 21 1978.
y
We shall appreciate your review and approval of the statement in the amount
of $3,718.52 for payment,
Yours very truly,
FREES AND NICHOLS, INC.
R. A. Miller
i
~J RAM-ma
Enclosure
x
3 ~
TILt►MONC 611 SSO.1141 II} LAMAR STRICT PORT WORTH, TSXAS 76109
s
V.,
STATEMENT
FREESE AND 11C110LS, I11C,
C O N I U L T I N G I N 6 1 N I l It I }
TOi CITP OF DENTON 1
l' DATE, August 81 1979 t
k:
Acct NO. DTN 78197
13.
rlorlsuoNA slRnu: In connection with landfill site evaluation as a special assignment
as requested by Mr. Jack Owens, December 1, 1978, k
STATEMENT NO. 1: SERVICES DURING DECEMBER 1978 - MARCH 31, 1979:
Associate: E. C. Copeland a
Staff: C. M, Thelin, W. 9. Mann, J, H. Buck
Month Associate hr Staff Salary Cost Expense
Dec 78 4 5 235.03 $126,59
Jan 79 471.30 164.52
Feb 79 4 493.05 3.25
Mar 79 _ 14.40
F
TOTAL d $10205.38 $308.76
COMPUTATION OF FEE:
Associate•per diem: 1 day @ $350/day $ 350.00
Staff Salary Cost, tl,205.38 x 2.6 3,013.45
Expense: } 308.76 x 1.15 355.07
TOTAL FEE DUE $3,718.52 k
y k
y;
i
11LIFHONI 111 116,1161 111 IAMAR 111111 FORT WOITH, 1IXA1 11101
_ ....~.+~.,..,,ww.rwww.~sraw•r.~w,r+........".^__....,... _.._-^++w,t
I
I
CITY OF DENTON
1WORANDUM
TO: Mayor & Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATE: Saptamber 4, 1979
SUBJECT: Consider authorizing City Manager to execute
a contract with LWFW, Inc. to perform a financial
feasibility study of Aubrey Reservoir.
di
If the Council Members will recall we have been negotiating
with the City of Dallas for several months in an effort to
develop a program for developping a final decision on the e
r status of the Aubrey Reservoir. The approach which we devel-
oped involves the preparation of a financial feasibility study
E which will review and evaWats engineering data previously
prepared by various engineering firma and the U. S. Corps of
Engineers.
Requests for proposals on this study were sent to twelve firms;
four firma responded with pproposals for this pproject. Those
firma wares Arthur Young & Co Certified Pug lie Accountants;
Ernst & Whinnoy, Certified Pubile Accountants; Gilbert Common-
wealth, Consulting Engineera; and LWFW, Inc., a Dallas based
managing firm.
Last Monday afternoon Bob Nelson, Bill McNary, and I met with
three representatives of the City of Da114e to interview the
four firma. Although all four of the proposals were well
prepared, the unanimous consensus of the Aubrey Steering Com-
mittee is that the contract should be awarded to LWFW, Inc.
of Dallas. our opinion, this firm offers the beat approach
for developing an analysis which will be acceptable to 311 of i
the parties concerned.
The cost of the proposed study is $38,000 plus $1,700 in out-of• i
pocket expenses to be shareds 74% City of Dallas, 26% Cityy of
Denton. Dallas has also agreed that Denton will take the lead
in this study by executing the contract with LWFW, Inc. and
that the City of Dallas will reimburse Denton for its share of
the project.
j
r
{
I
j~,}l+i+d+e,.. +,nvtiyBR~i,Bb~'St''PI~'I'-Htc1T!'+1`■I
! is
City Council Members
September 4, 1979
Page Two
I might also point out that although price was not a significant
factor in our evaluation of these proposals, the LWFW, Inc. pro-
posal was some $15 - $20,000 less than the other three.
We respectfully request that the City Council authorise the City
Manager to execute this contract.
s
z s ar ung
GCK: jm
Attachments
7 a J
1
i
i
g
,
t) 7
4
k ~
i
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a proposal for a Financial Feasibility Study of
f
Aubrey Reservoir for the Cities of Dallas and Denton,
Texas. The study has three (3) primary objectives
1. To update cost estimates of Aubrey Reservoir, and
to determine the estimated unit cost of water.
2. To compare the cost of Aubrey water with the cost a
i.
r' of water from alteniative reservoirs that could be
~ h
constructed in East Texas. {
3. To evaluate alternative strategies for sponsoring
k
a
~ and constructing Aubrey Reservoir. ~
For purposes of this study, "coat" is defined as the "
cost of water delivered to the treatment plants of both
a
Dallas and Denton. r'
i The remainder of this proposal contains a discussion of t
the Study's Scope of Work and Study Methodology, LWFW's y
r
Qualifications to conduct this Study, the Qualifica-
tions of the Proposed Study Team, the Study Schedule,
i
and the Projected Study Cost. "
{
i
{t
i
t'- ~i ~
VVSNC. .1-
L`'~
• LY{l~
II. STUDY SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
The Cities of Dallas and Denton have had a long stand-
ing agreement to share in the financial support of the
construction of Aubrey Reservoir. Construction of the
project was originally planned by the Corps of Engi-
neers for the late 197019. Various circumstances have
t
caused the project to be delayed. In recent years,
different `reports have
presented varying water yields
? and costs for Aubrey Reservoir. It is the intent of i
this study to review the various reports, to analyze 4
I
the basic underlying financial and legal assumptions
~
and to develop a realistic estimate of the cost of j
water from alternative reservoirs in East Texas. It
should be emphasized that this study will utilize
existing information and reports to a maximum while
focusing on the areas of financial feasibility and
financing alternatives.
I
j As specified in the Request for Proposal, the study
will investigate and analyze the following specific
areas- 7
A. Aubrey Reservoir cost Analysis
1. Safe Yield - A responsible "safe yield's
rating will be recommended for Aubrey. The
primary basis for the rating will be existing
reports including those prepared by the U,$.
Corps of Engineers, Forrest and Cotton, Inc.,
Lti1'V1 ~N~ -2- !
..,.....ti,.,,err;_~+~►itlaiiR.itw~r,«.~...,_. _~M.~,:
r j
k
i
Freese & Nichols, Inc ,o and the cities of
Dallas and Denton. In determination of safe
yield, prior water rights shall be fully
recognized and the recent preliminary report
of the upper Trinity Adjudication shall be
the principal resource as to water rights.
k
2. Federal Pro ect - The Corps of Engineert.
i
estimates regarding, construction costs and
construction schedules will be reviewed. 5
t' With the Corps of Engineers as the financing
and construction agent, the normal project
steps or phases and associated completion
schedules will be identified. 3
3. Local Sponsor - A similar analysis will be
made of the cost and completion time if the
cities or a separate local agency were to act
as the financing and construction agent.
k
Under this analysis, the costs of flood
g
control and recreational facilities pl mned
by the Corps of Engineers will be separated.
i
3
4. State Financing - LWFW will investigate' the
_ r
availability and analyze the impact of using k
State of Texas Water Development Funds on
project cost and completion schedules.
9+
I
i
t
.3-
r
r
5. Cost Elements - As stated in items 1-4 above,
the study team will identify the major incre-
m.nts of costs and estimated time require-
ments associated with each alternative.
B. East Texas River Basin Reservoir Costs Analysis
1
The study team will review available engineering
reports and identify one or more alternative water
supply reservoirs in East Texas. Comparative
coats estimates and completion timed will be
developed for each alternative. Using this data,
the cost of water delivered to Dallas and Denton
treatment plants will be projected utilizing a a
model in which enorgy costs will be increased at a
high, moderate and low rate of increase.
C- o.,perational Costs
The study will develop a cost schedule covering
both capital related costs and delivery costs for i
raw water over a thirty (30) year period of time !
from the reservoir completion date. A description 4
i
of the methodology and assumption used in prepar-
ing the cost schedule shall be included in the
final report for each of the following three (3)
alternativest
1
1. A U.S, Corps of Engineers Aubrey Reservoir
Project
i
J
LVw 4"
A~~•"'•.... ...,.,.......~w.w-tt;YU'9N$Q~t}Yfi3~1c~~i,Rt44 W7'+~II•AB~-m'm'....,
2. A locally sponsored Aubrey Water Supply
Project
3. A reservoir constructed in the East Texas
River Basin.
Due to the number of alternatives requiring analysis
and the major variables associated with each alterna-
tive over time, LWFW intends to develop a computer
model to simplify the analysis of alternatives. It is
j anticipated that this model can also be utilized to
' simulate a variety of "whet if" situations without
involving a large amount of effort and cost.
The LWFW study team will work closely with the Aubrey
Steering Committee and meet on a regular basis to
review study progress and findings as they are devel-
oped. A preliminary draft of the final report will be
presented and reviewed with the steering committee
prior to presentation to both Dallas and Denton.
k
Followinq the preliminary draft report review, a final
l draft report and presentation will be made to both
cities. As a result of this presentation, a final
report will be prepared and submitted to both Cities
along with a presentation to the Water Management
Advisory Council.
3
'j
Yr..«...
INC. MANAGEMENT CONSULXANT9
Dallas Houston - Austin
August 27, 1979
i
Mr. Chris Hartung
a City Manager
0 City of Denton
r 215 E. McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr. Hartungt
As we discussed on the telephone, we have modified our
approach to the Aubrey Reservoir Study to include for-
mal engineering involvement by URS/rorrest and Cotton
and Freese 3 Nicholas. I have discussed this involve.
ment with Principals from both firms, and they have
agreed to work with us on this study.
To accommodate this formal engineering involvement, we
propose to inorerae the project budget by $13,000 to a
total of $38,000 for professional fees plus $10700 for
expenses.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to`
call ma.
k
Sincerely,, 3
i
y
Gary S. Thompson, P,L.
Principal
GsTsew
'i
12700 Park Coma!, Suite 1608 Dallas, T*xas 76261 + (414) 233.6661
1
i
p
I AUBREY RESERVOIR FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY PLAN
This is the detailed study plan for the Financial Feasibil-
ity Study of Aubrey Reservoir- This plan contains a
discussion of the major tasks associated with the study, as
well as a bar chart schedule illustrating the timing of each
major task.
a
To date there have been a number of studies related to the
feasibility of Aubrey Reservoir. Both Cities, Denton and
Dallas, as well as their engineering firms, URS/Forrest &
E Cotton and Freese and Nicholes, have spent significant time
considering this important subject.
LWFW recognizes the value of the considerable work that has
been done to date with respect to the feasibility of Aubrey
Reservoir and views our most effective role in this study as
that of a catalyst. In the role of a catalyst, LWFW
represents an independent economic specialist,-familiar with
both Cities' needs and with the technical importance of the
I,
~ engineering studies that have been done to date. During a
1 this study, LWFW will work with each organization that, has a
been directly involved with Aubrey Reservoir to update the
previous studies, define financially feasible alternatives,
and help both Cities make a final decision- regarding their
role, if tiny, in Aubrey Reservoir.
i
I
In the course of this study, LWFW intends to work closely
with both the cities of Denton and Dallas through the Aubrey
Steering Committee. In addition, LWFW will work closely
with the following organizationst URS/Forrest & Cotton,
Inc., Freese and Nicholes, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and
First Southwest Financial Corp. A final presentation will
also Le made to the water Management Advisory Council.
The remainder of this document contains the discussion of
major study tasks and the study schedule.
r
1 I. SET UP THE QR03ECT ORGANIZATION AND DOCTIMENT THE
f KEY ISSUES'
A. LWFW will read h1l previous study reports in ;j
detail, outline the reports, and tabulate all the
major factors affecting the Reeervoir►s economic
i
feasibility.
B. LWFW will classify each of these major factors 1
requiring updating and/or reassessment including
how this process will occur. It is anticipated
i
! that this process will includes
1. Updating of technical and financial da'ca s`
a
2. Reassessment of technical and non-technical
assumptions
3, Definition of technical and financial vari-
ables requiring sensitivity analysis in the
economic model
i
-2-
,
4.
C. LWFW will also meet with Principals of each of the
outside organizations who will participate on the
i
project to discuss the study objectives, schedule
and their respective roles.
i
1. URS/Forrest & Cotton, Inc.
2. Freese and Nicholes
3. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
k 4. First Southwest Financial Corp
II. CONDUCT AUBREY bTEERING COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
t The purpose of this workshop will be a review of all
i
technical and economic factors associated with the
Reservoir's feasibility so that both LWFW and the
E Steering committee achieve a common level of under-
s
standing of the issues early in the stAy process.
L
III. COST UPDATING, RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
EE A. LWFW and the engineering firms will update cost
i estimates of Aubrey Reservoir and the costs of
obtaining water from alternate reservoirs. s
j
k B. LWFW, the Aubrey Steering Committee, and the otter
organizations participating in the study will
analyze, discuss and resolve key technical and
non-technical assumptions affecting the financial
i
feasibility of the study.
,
C. LWFW will research and evaluate alternate strata
gies for sponsoring and constructing Aubrey
Reservoir.
i
D. LWFW will present and discuss the above informa.-
tion with the Aubrey Steering Committee at
Steering Committee meetings 2 and 3.
IV. DEVELOP A DETAILED FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MODEL
LWFW will develop a model to analyze the financial
feasibility of Aubrey Reservoir. Due to the number
z;
of variables affecting the outcome, a computerized
model will be of great benefit. With this model, a
variety of "what if" situations can be evaluated,
~ t
and the impact of important variables such as energy
rates and inflation can be assessed. '
i
t
V. CONDUCT FINANCIAL ANALYSES
This step includes the use of the analysis model to
perform the various financial analyses.
VI. REVIEW AND REFINE THE FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OF TSE
ALTERNATIVES j
During this study the results of specific analyses
€ made in the previous step will be reviewed and + j
refined based on the input of the Aubrey Steering
Committee.
i
VII. DEVELOP CONSENSUS AUBREY STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMEN-
DATIONS f
I
l
L `,rr ~`ruac „4-
26
II
VIII. PRESENT STUDY FINDINGS AND RECO10i'?NDATIONS TO T1iE
CITIES OF DENTON AND DALLAS
I These presentations can be formal or conducted in the
form of workshops.
z
IX. PRESENT STUDY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE
WATER MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION COUNCIL
X. SUBMIT FINAL REPORT
S ~
S
~ t
.
Y
V
l
i
;fir
DETAILED STUDY SCHEDULE
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY OF
AUBREY RESERVOIR
WEEK OF STUDY
MAJOR TASK 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 15
1. Set up Project Organization/
Document Key Issues
II. Steering CowIttee Workshop
I
III. Cost Updating, Research and
Analysis
IV. Develop Detailed Financial
A1131y818 Model
i V. Conduct Financial Analyses e
{ VI. Reviev and Refine Financial
Feasibility of Alternatives
VII. Develop Steering Committee p
* y
Consensus Recommendations
s VIII, Present Study Findings and
Recommendations to Denton
III and Dallas
IX. Present Study Findings and
Recommandations to Water
I Monagement'Advisory Council
X. Submit Formal Report
I
a Proposed Steering Committee meetings with LWFW
.00- will
I
I
I
I
I
DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1979
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider report on the recently organized Texas Public Power
Association, an organization formed to represent the 73
Municipal Electric Utilities of Texas on legislature matters.
i SZAt-MRY:
Historically the municipal electric systems in Texas have not
had to concern themselves extensively with legislative issues
since electric systems and especially municipal systems were not
under state regulations. Under the Home Rule concept and with
City Charters provisions the citizens of each City co~il.u handle
their regulatory problems within the city. During tb-, last two
legislative sessions, however, many legislative bills have been
introduced that severely affect yicipal electric systems.
a Also the rublic Utility Commission continues to promulgate rules
and regulations that have serious effects on municipal electric
systems.
J. Because of these developments several cities, includin
Brownsville, Lubbock, Weatherford, College Station, Ro stown,
Weirmar, and others began last January working together to
formulate statewide municipal electric utility positions on
various issues and to work cooperatively on legislative issues.
As a result of this gro's activities, a Certificate of
Incorporation was filedup in June for a formal organization known P
as the Texas Public Power Association. An organizations! meeting
was held on July 17, 1979. The first annual meeting is planned
for late October.
A dues structure has not yet been finalized but it app rs that
annual membership fees will range from a minimum of 5250 to $Soo
for the smallest cities to a maximum of $S,000 to $6500 for the
larger cities, based an KWH to a maximum of S00 million KWH. 3
^9yY H
FISCAL 90ARY.
Estimated Cost $5,000 $6,500/Year.
i
i
T
yu.r. w:cew.y~~ ~~~,*~7bMi'JJ.+:a#+.•-»»..... ^"V
~~upa~,,,Cy;~ v
A.fl.
AC'T'ION RT3QUIRM.
Recommendation regarding affiliation with other municipal
electric systems of Texas in the Texas public Power
Association.
ALTHWT1VBS:
1. Membership in Texas Power Association:
This would allow Denton to have input to establishing
a State wide municipal electric system position on
various electric utility, legislative and
i ; regulatory matters. ?
} 2. Remain independent from other municipal electric system
r, in Texas in legislative and regulatory matters.
C
RBOObir43JDATIONS:
f The Public Utility Board reviewed this item at their August 29,
1979 meeting and declined by a vote of 2 to 2 recommending to
the council consideration of affiliation In the Texas Power
Association.
i,
Respectfully,
7,4
R. E, Nelson
Exhibits: 'i
I • Articles of Incorporation.
}
f9
yI
jy
a
rn.Ea
1n u1. oP,ee o1 as
s.n«an~ et srtr a1 htr
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION JUl11 1979
TEXAS PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION ~IonMl ~e~ NUleDkiio~
t t
~ s
He, the undersigned natural persons of the age of twenty-
one years or more, at least two of whoa are citizens of the
State of Texas, acting as incorporators pursuant to the Texas
` Non-profit Corporation Act, do hereby adopt the following
i' Articles of IncOrporatloni
ARTICLE I
The now of the corporation is Texas Public power
Association.
4
ARTICLE It
The corporation is a non-profit corporation.
a
f ARTICCC III
The period of its duration is perpetw 1,
! ARTICLE IV
f` The purpose or purposes for which the corporation is
j
organised arse
(Ii To act as a trade association for municipally
owned electric utilities in Texas.
11) To provide contralixed direction, a central
information center and a spokesman for Tests
municipally owned electric utilities on state-
wide and national issues. s
ARTICLE V
Members of the corporation will be limited to Taxaa cities
oho own and operate ilectrio generation or distribution
lacilitles.
TXhibit 2.1
CITY OF DENTCN
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING September 4. 1919 _
AGENDA ITEM SID i 8675 Truck and Bole DiRRer
SL MlARY: "s
r
This bid is for the purchase of a 440000 GVW tandem axle truck cab
and chassis and a twelve foot by 48 inch maximum hydraulic powered self con-
tained hole digger. The digger is to be mounted on the truck furnished by the
s City of Denton. This unit will be used by the Electric Distribution Depart-
meat in the maintenance and construction of the City of Denton Electric over-
head distribution and transmission system. The unit this is replacing is a
1968 model digger mounted on a 1963 model truck cab and chassis. The old unit
will be sold at public auction.
r. FISCAL SUMMARY:
i
F This purchase to a motor pool replacement and will be charged to the
motor pool replacement account number 06-98-87-07.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval by council
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve as recommended.
2. Reject all bids.
a
STA 1 RECOMMW. IONS:
We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting
i
specifica- tion, Item 19 truck cab and chassis to Banner Chevrolet for a modal C7DO60
Chevrolet for the amount of '18,933.22, 108 Denton, delivery in 90 days. Item 2,
to Dunham Mfg. Company, Minden, Louisiana, for a model 430 Dunham Teagua hole
digger in the amount of $35,499.32 plus $49000.00 for an optional 10,000 pound
front mounted winch, FOB, Denton, delivery 120 days. Total price for the cam-
plate unit is $18,432.54.
EXHIBITS: !
1 Tabulation shset.
Tom D. Shav, C•P.M
E Purchasing Agent
1
1 1
u.. ..,.~..~aNM4•laV iL.MF'S'~',H•Vih".~'r~k.r.fr.~..~....... ~.y,
f y •
I
4TAM~ ,
DID 1 8675
DID Truck 6 Hole Digger _ CIA Metro
Denham Mfg Machinery Commercial Ford Banner Calvert Habaney
OPEN MO PH 8/16/79 Company Co. Body Truck Chevrolet Motor International
ACCOUNT 1 06-98-87-07
QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VE DO ENDO VENDO VENDOR VE FOA VENDOR VS.NDOR
1. 1 Truck cab 6 chassis 41,000 CVW $240490.00 ' $20,421.33 $180933,22 $20,410,43 $20,395.00
LT 800 C7D064 F1924 F1924
a 2. 1 Hole digger 12 ft.
$35,499,32 $64,489,E NIB
12' min. D. by 48" Max. N.
i Ad o for front wi ch $4,000.00
a ,
Deliver 120 day 90 da 90 day 90 day 159-I80 da 180 day
i
5
t ,
I
E
k
r
i
CITY OF DENTON
ME140RANDUM
DATE OF MEETING September 4, 1979
AGENDA ITEM P.O. 4 40281 Replacement Pump
SUMMARY I
This purchase order is for an emergency replacement pump in our
Sewer Treatment plant. This is a return sludge pumping unit number two
and must be one that will fit our present piping frame and motor. Therefore,
i only two known companies can furnish this unit- This is an emergency so
we have called and received quotes from Southern Engine and Pump slid from t
Smith Pump Company.
x
FISCAL SU*MY:
` This will be paid from budgeted maintenance funds.
ACTION REQUIRED:
3
Approval of this pump as an emergency repair item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
i
He recommend with tae using department that this purchase srder
be approved for the purchase of a Fairbanks-Horst pump from Southern Engine
and Pump Company for $4,189.00.
EXHIBITS:
Tabulation sheet-
.
ell" 10 .0 ' If
~i John J Marshall, C.P.M
PurcN;Aing Agent
j
I
I
y
1 Purchase order 1 40281
BID RaAt-pnppt. porn Southern Smith
Engine d pump Co.
OPEN ehcne with written quotes pump
ACCOUNT f 04-70-83-43•
TYIT-E- DESCRIPTION VEN R VENDOR VE DOR VENDOR VENDOR E DO VENDOR
1.• 1 Sewage return pump to fit
i
present motor and piping _ t
system $44189.00 14 4 3.00
FOB Denton Denton
i
Delivtr 6-8 wke. 8 wks.'
t
I
i
I
' aF'Y;tisry
4
A
DATE ,
i p
1 TOr 9
DEPT.
rpom
0ST]CATt • WDlat Paa TWa REQVEPT
E G rArac APPAp'MrAM Acrror, r j to YM)t Kzco PrErarATtom
❑ 1,00Aar PON hY 11100ATVAA f7 roA YnuR fNPPiV1AT1011
E
b au ME O rt e,
rk k f~ ]rr;AD Afar Who ? ❑ InpuadT APPkOVgp
d r
POp ioult
APP00VA4 &"IUD
p RT!'Apr r Lt .4 hmiot ; atONAllrrW.
of,
WMI
Q
A, f, All,
I
I
City Council Agenda
September 4, 1979
Page Three
Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by 'he Staff and approval
thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the
City manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
A. Bids/Purchase Orders
1. Bid 88675. Purchase of Truck with Utility Pole hole s
1digger.
A
2. Purchase Order 840281. Purchase of sewage pump mMWW.
Executive Session
a
t, A. Legal
1i
1 48. ;deal Estate
1I
C. Personnel
t
D. Board Appointments
Consider Board Appointments
j
1
P
w
~r
601
E
,
r ~ I
{
r
i r I
I I ~ .k
~ ~ ! • , k I ' S ! ' i. { ` rill
+ ! 1 a f t't-~'t- -F-''+ i H y t I ! . , ; 1 . ! t L , I '
1 Fr
r '
I ! ;1 ~
3 1! , ~ rl
I (.i LSi !{'li r } it I i 4t Y ` k I ~1
a , t,ll~ .S.S t I I.♦t4 1.h rif~ti k ; i _t I~
, 7 ? t.l.~,f~ ,.i I F
LL
r, E } T
? I ~1:,tr!1 I I,? 1 r i1 , Fi 1 1 ?1 ~ f.'t~~t 1 li
I (l1I I[? ~I 1, j. i r{.~~ ~1 1, i ( I1 ~~r t 1.1 !
1 !1! I
1. ti a ♦-1-1-5 Ir .1 .,.1 ,-rc .a H I.{ liJ
I_ j 'F I I'r r ,IZs ~ ill?}! ''+~Ilil?~ t{~
,III " I 1 i l.~
' ji1 G tl rl r i 1' i
I r
!al 1 ! % 1ki 1d ? ~I 1 is
~ i. r 1 l a t
i
r ! { ± { Ilt4 ' Ii 1114{ E1~ I4 1 ~'r~; !~4 t~ f~?it~t` 'j!
' , ! i r 1 I I I I l i r l i
r i ~ Y ~ 1.+-.+•+ I ! ~l) 1 E ~ i t .il.-! ~ y ` ; 1..' ~..1 I.y 1~ ~-~-1~~~ t.l ' 1 1 1..•..! ~~'T"; ,'.ya 1 *+~-r-~~;
{
' ft jJ , E 1 i 1
~ }jf +?li'{Yj I`~r t I ~ li ltt,+ 1~ ; I~~j ;}{ft+tj~ {~1i 1
ry@ .-.1 .~-i~r tT?'! ~~.~-t.~'{"'T.}~-i~-~r-•~~,. f». 1• ~ 4.~
I't 111 i.~. lx 1.'4{ ka ~rt~a l ,14:11, ij~r lll..! I {.1i 1{ iEl l~. l-f .dfi-~! ~ ~ {i ~H,
_ I i 1 1 1
~ 11. ~ 141 t ' + 1 t, L, .1 !1 ,.t h , + .i fI
it 4' ! j_'lil Ct!~f 11T ~I 1t t r 1! r.. t- ~ 1! 1~1 t.~ ?a11~1t
' ~ ( l t I 1 1 t 1 , t 'i I / t , i t i t r I l 1 I F ~ t~ i~! i ~C } l ~
~ ~ ~ } - r.... s-?.~. 1..~. {_I.4~ -i-+ 'Y» t-1.~1 l I-1-..`l ~ 1 -Ht ~-i,_•
E I ! l 1 i 4 ~ I ~ r , ? 1 + } t ! . { ?.1 , 1 i I t I•! { • _
y y tl ( fl { ,~i i4 1},' !l. ,11 ~ ~ I~1~ ?II{ ili~ +f ~Ik~ 'u
1
1J F t ~ f ' l,i r ' I~- ! 1 i s ' 1~ I i t j t t i l j.{ ~ 1 1,~ a~ l I. _r { 1 1
`~s, f 11 lii l~a i j1 l' c )it~ Ii { ?~1 I 1 d}~L1II 4 1 I i ~ ?I.
y. ~~~'~1 , i ila11 11 1 -?1 Ir~I !!"i 1'! I a1_,( q { .r 11 d 41-: I~tT }
! _~TTT t..~. y t i~....1-L -~+}--.rt~ .i-1-.--I.1-r~-I--~ a.+-r i. i.l. r• ~ `^~-~-Y f'~
kll"' ~ r. I I ~ i r l. i a I i, f 4 1 1 I l 1 I l i i ♦ l l ! I t I r ~
i t ~ St~! LI 11.4~a'~14 Itt t ~ 1~ iL~rl III ~~I 11 IIli l~. ?.1~ S }j i~~~~.~ } Il lllr
iiV?!r ~t{ 1 ?1111 r I t( F hl i
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING OF SAID CITY ON THE 7TH
DAY Ck AUGUST, A. D. 1979.
E RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the City of Denton currently Dvns the electrical
system located at the North Texas State University Cempusli and
WHEREAS, the electrical service to North Texas State
University is presently moteted at twenty-six (26) locations;
and
WHEREAS, North Taxes State University has expressed a
desire to purchase the City of Denton's electrical system now
In use and thereafter purchase the electrical power at the
primary voltage of 13,200 volts at two separate locations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the CltY of Denton has
sxptessed a willingness to sell such electrical system; and
WHEREAS, North Texas State University has offered to
purchase the sold electrical system for $125,000.00 by issuance
of a purchase order rot such system; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that subject
distribution facilities would be considered surplus upon N SU;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that thw ails of
subject distribution aystem facilities to NTSU with the
subsequent tenovel of 2/ Individual motoring permits and the
furnishing of wholesale electrical power and energy at two
metering points would not Imps re essential and effective
utility service to NTSU or the remaining utility customers and
further that subject facilities would be temporarily surplus If
i not sold to NTSUI and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton Utility Board has reviewed end
tecommended approval of such a transfer of the said electrical
system; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Oenton, after
careful consideration of the matter believes It to be in the t
{ bast interest of thn City of Denton and its citizens to soil
the Said electrical Lyatami
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED SY THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE
CITY Of DENTON, TEAS. THATt
I
SECTION 1.
The City Council of the City of Denton has herebyY agreed to
sell such electrical system and sssocisted distribution ttsns•
t formers and other related facilities as outlined in Exhibit "A• t
ii attached herewith end made I pate of this Resolution to North 1
Texas Store Uniweei'.y for the total' sum or $125,DOO.001 pto-
vided, however, that such sale shall be in full aoeDtdonce to
the following circumatenceil f
(1) the traRsfet of title and ownership for
individual or grow s of distribution ttsns•
farmers and/or facilities shell remain with
the city of Denton until such time is any
such distrlbution transfotmsr and Asia-
Cleted facility is complotely de•enatqiced
for the purpose of permitting North Texl$
tt State University to convstt ~lhelr primary
pewee circuit to such dlittlbution ttane-
former, at which time ownership, control
end maintenance responsibility of Such
distribution tfansfotmet and associated j
facility shall transfer automatically to
North Texas State university.
(b) after any distribution transformer end
d
:oj.A`~~~',a
t
I
associated facility Ss so transferred,
North Texas State University $hall make
full pament to the City of Denton of the
value of such distribution transformer and
l associated facility.
(c) the meeting for each distribution trans.
former shell continue on an Individual
transformer bests until transfer of control
and ownership of all distribution trans-
formers is complete at which time metering
shall be accomplished through two master
meters, or until the ownership of a group
of trenofarmers Can be transferred so that
such electrical parer to such transformers
I can be master mstered.
(d) prior to any transfer of ownership of any
distribution transformer or associated
facility appropriate officials of North
Texas state Univarsity shall enter Into a
written agreement with the City of Denton
incorporating into such agreement the
aforementioned terms and conditions.
SECTION it,
The Mayor of the City of Denton, Taxes, is hereby
authorised and directed to execute on behalf of the City or
Denton any ucessary agreements or other legal documents-to
effectuate t.d s sets,
f a PASSED AND APPROVED this the 7th day of August, A, 0, 1979.
j t CITY OIASH
DEN TON, TEXAS t
s ,
ATTESTr
iµ
BROOKS 14OLY i
TE
CITY 0 GENTbIJ,,_k~15_....... . _
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
ATTOKNEY, CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
k
~I I
5f
3
i
. S
I
1 7
1
yy i i
fi