HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-01-1980
.
M
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
April 1980
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council Tuesday,
April 1, 1980 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building. Broadcast live on RNTU Radio, 88.5 P.M.
i'
11 Public Hearings:
A. 1. Consider final action regarding the request of
the Planning and Zoning COm14:3sion for
annexation of approximately 314.9 acres of land
belonging to Texas Instruments.
2. This is the petition of the Planning and Zoning
Commission requesting light industrial (LI)
zoning classification on a tract approximately
314.9 acres in size. The property is located on
the north side of Highway 77, adjacent and east
of Bonnie Brae Road. This property is owned by
Texas Instruments,
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
2. Consider a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation
Board relative to the policy concerning participation in
City League sports by non-resident teams.
3. Consider adopting an ordinance authorizing the issuance of
Certificates of Obligation, 8erles 1980. (Library
expansion.)
4. Consider awarding bide for the Library expansion.
5. Ordinances:
A. Cor.j idor adopting an ordinance instituting final
action regarding the request of Mr. H. S. Osborna for
annexation and Agricultural (A) zoning classification
on a tract approximately 37.5 acres in size. The
property has approximately 40 feet of frontage along
the east side of Country Club Road (FM 1830) etiid
begins approximately 1800 feet south of the
intersection of Hobson Road and FM 1830, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
y
i\
i
City Council Agenda
April 1$ 1980
Page Two
B. Consider adopting an ordinance removing arki on
certain portions of Crescent and Fulton Streetsg and
establishing a five minute standing-only zone on a
certain portion of Fulton Street in front of the
Denton Public High School, (The Citizens Traffic
Safety Support Committee recommends approval,)
i
C. Consider adopting an ordinance amending Appendix B of
the comprehensive zoning ordinance by creating a new
Article 28A entitled "Historic Landmark preservation".
6. Consider financing for the widening of Loop 288 from the
MILT Railroad Tracks to I-35E.
A. Consider a resolution authorizing the signatures and
the signing of the escrow agreement with the State,
{
B. Consider a resolution authorizing the financing for 1
the widening of Loop M.
7. Consider a contract with the Denton Girls Softball
Association (or umpire services for all Girls' Youth
League softball games, (The Parks and Recreation Board
recommends approval,)
8. Consider the final plat of Skyline Addition. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial.)
94 Consider final payment to LWFW Consultants for Aubrey
Reservoir Financial Feasibility Study, (,the Public
Utilities Board recommends approval,)
i
10. Consider final payment to Claude Smith Construction Co,
for overwidth paving on Kings Row,
11. Consider a
iH-35W, participation in 16„ oversize water lines along
(The Public Utilities Board recommends approval,)
12. Consider setting the April 8, 1980 Study Session Agenda,
13. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manger or his designee to implement
each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations.
i
I
I
i
I
i
I
City Council Agenda
April 1, 1980
Page Three
1
A. Bids/Purchase orders
1. Bid 18748 Pickups 6 Vans
2. P.O. #42187 Emergency Repairs Rig f9936 to Darr
j Eqpt. Co. for $4,629.16 J
I
B. Plats
1. Consider the final replat of Owsley Park
Addition. I
20 Consider the final replat of Schmitz and Ripy
Addition.
14. Executive Session
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate I
C, Personnel 11
D, Board Appointments
15. Consider Board Appointments
I
t
E
P
r
S
Y
P
f
i
'I
i
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 1, 1980
A ends Item;
A. Consider final action
and on an ordinance regarding the request of the Planning
Zoning Commission for annexation of approxima
Texas instruments, tely 314,9 acres of land belonging
to 8. This is the petition of the Planning and Zoning Commission requesting Light
Industrial (LI) Zoning classification on a tract approximate) 314
The property is located on the north side of Highway 77, adjacent
acres in size.
Bonnie Brae Road, This property is owned by Texas Instruments, and east of
Su-nmarvThe Petition of the Planning and Zoning Commission for annexation of a 314,9
acre tract belonging to Texas Instruments comes before the City Council for final
action at this time. The petition for annexation has completed the public hearing
process, and all state requirements regarding annexation have been met.
Recommendation.-
The Planning and Zonin? Commission unanimously recommends approval of the Texas
Instruments annexation,
F Action R_~,; red:
To complete the annexation process the City Council should move to adopt the
annexation ordinance prepared by the City Attorney.
If the annexation ordinance is approved by the City Council, a public hearing
concerning the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission for Lig"t Industrial
(LI) zoning classification of the Texas Instruments property should be conduct
At the conclusion of the public hearing the City Council should move to adopt the
process.
ordinance zoning the property Light Industrial (LI) in order to complete the zoning
Exhibits;
A. Memo
8. Ordinance W140
C. Recommendation ✓
D. Map
E. Zor ,,g Ordinance
i
~ i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LA"O CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALI, 'T'HAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 13,7!9 635.75 SQUARE FEET OF LAND
AND BEING INITHE JITUSTECOLLARD SURVEY~ABSTRACCTONO.s291 AP WHITS
1401E D~EN70N COUNIY, TEXASI CLASSIFYING THE SAMHEYA~ AGRICULTURAL
- 1 "A" DISTRICT PROPERTYI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the request for sn.exation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the petition of the planning 3 toning Commission; and '
WHEREAS, an opportunity vat afforded, at i public hearing held
for that purpose of February 19, 1980 for all interested persons
to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the
annexation pro-Ided by this ordinance; and
WMREAS, this ordinance has been publi+hed in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texass
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW THEREPORB, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY SnAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of'land be, and the same
Is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is
made hereby a part of sold city and the land and the presant and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other cititens of said City and shall be bound by
the sets and ordinances of siid City nov in effect or which may
hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein; $hall be .
subject to and sholl bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by
the City. The tract o: land hereby annexed is described as
follows, to-wits
Being all that certain lot, tract ar psreel of land - lyinand
being situated in the County of Dentons State of Taxes and being
t art of the J. S. Collard survey Abstract No. 297, tie A. Whits
urvey, Abstract No. 1406 and the N. Bade Survey, Abstract No.
14070
and being more particularly desc N bed as followsi
BEGINNING at a point in the existing Denton City Limits Line as
established by Ordinance No. 6S-43, said oint of beginning also
bean the southeast corner of the J. S. Coollard Survey, Abstract
To.rob7,survey,sAbstrac t No. 1238 Noand or ~~Inuthe centerline of
Riney Lid;
i ,
1
G
F.
ro
i
nIANCE north 880 37' 35" West along the south boundary line of
raid J S. Collard survey, same being the centerline of Riney Road
akdist.olc; ofliae 0 feet t hija po 77jfor a corner in the northeast
MEW fght Way THENCE north $80 081 36" west along the northeast right of way
line of U. S. Highway 77, a distance of 884,11-fast to a point]
THENCE north Sao 09' 36" west along the northeast right of way
ii corner .sameHbeing the asouthacotrer ofSOaDcorner cutoff lit the
withtthe least right of way lineoof lonnii iBrae Roidj S. Highway 77
distance of 26290 60 feet tog a point For along said corner rear cutoff line a .
i
THENCE north 00 12' 13" east AionY the east right of way line of
Bonnie aria Road a distance of 2045.03 feet to a point for a •
corner;
THENCE south 880 56' Q3" east a distance of 4165.61 feet to a
point for a corner in t e east boundary line of said j S. Collard,
9urvsy, same being the west boundary line of Wald T. Toby Survey=
iHEHCa south 00 590 39° west along the east boundary line of
said J. S. Collard Survey, sate being the west boundary line of '
said T. Toby Survey a distance of 1,265.05 lest to a point;
THENCE south 00 52' Dr,y west along the east boundary line of
of
said T. TobyoSurvey SiYediitence of 3075h59wfeetbto the pline of
beginning and contsining 13,719,635.1s square feet of land, more
or less,
I
SECTION II.
.he above described property is hereby classified as
A{ricultrra.+. "A" District and shall so appear, ori the official
toning map of the City of Denton,,.Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its '
passage. '
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
A. D. 1980.
I'll CITY PISH Df.'jTO,N, TEXAS
f
i
ATTEST}
I
i . ,
CITY OF DENTON, Taw
i APPROVED AS To LEGAL FORj4
C. J. TAYLOR JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTSN, TEXAS
BY:
!..~M/Icy,M1e,.,,MI,~,~,..~P.,.,,rV11..~I.n.... M.~1.,~U►...+... J, ..'M.! +
II
1
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1408
April 1, 1980
Identity; Z-1408
This is the petition of Mr. Dale Cunningham requesting that an approximately 295
acre tract be annexed and zoned light Industrial (LI). This tract is located on
the north side of Highway 771 between Connie Brae and Riney Road.
Report and planning Commission Recommendation;
This tract is located in an area that is predominantly undeveloped. There is a
drive-in theater located on the south side of Highway 77 across from this property,
and there are several homes located near the southeast corner of the tract. The
veryiiowrdeof the area nsity surrounding this propert sitself tically bisected c by t the lproposed
ccrridor for Loop 288.
The question of whether public facilities are adequate depends largely on haw the
property is developed. Water service is relatively close and can be extended to
the property and there 1s adequate capacity in the line. Sewer service would
probably need to be extended from the area around North University Place. There
is adequate capacity in this line for a plant employing 3,000 persons, assuming
no industrial waste. There are no unusual drainage problems apparent on the
property. This tract has street access to Highway 77 and Bonnie Brae Street and,
of course, will eventually have street access to Loop 288. Highway 77 connects
to I-35 and leads into the city by Elm Street. The property also has direct access
to Bonnie Brae which leads to Windsor and University Drive,
The Public Works Director has reviewed access and traffic potential of the site.
It is assumed that Texas Instruments will build an assembly plant on the property.
He is also assuming a work force of 3,000. If the Public Works Director believes that therewill sbeasignificant atraffic econgestion
in the vicinity of this site until such time as the loop is completed. It is
likely that Bonnie Brae pavement would have to be improved within a short period,
particularly near the intersection and a traffic signal installed at the Bonnie Brae
intersection with Highway 377.
On the land use issue, this proposal is at variance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The property is proposed for Light Industrial (LI) zoning. The Comprehensive
Plan indicates that the area, both north and south of Highway 77, should be developed
for residential use. The Planning Commission feels it Is questionable whether tho
area immediately adjoining the Loop will actually be developed for single family
use.
The Planning Commission is recommending that the request for light Industrial (LI)
z
with the oning be approved as submitted, The Commission felt that, if this site is developed
that TI
suitabiesforeresidIt is
entiai use.
a
.r
Z-1408
Page 2
A local example of a light industrial pnlan1t, on a much smaller scale, built near a
residential area is the Jostens plant o-35. The Commission felt that the
possible problems invulving traffic and street mafntrnance could be overcome b
the city with sufficient notice and through cooperation by the petitioner. An by
important consideration in the Commissioner's decision was the benefits the city
would realize involving additional gobs and tax revenue through the development
of a T1 plant,
k
s
ii
e"
I
r
E
Z-1408
i
1" 2000'
c
i
s
NU. r
FfC,iSRDI ISNyS,L~ C"EyVDS;OA UPTED0+AS0 VN APPEN II,C TOT THSP CODE OOP
URDI;LhNCES OP TR9 CITY Cr` DE.NTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1,
"U AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO THE EELOV LISTED PROPERTY AS SHOWN DATE ANDS Wn E 0.4 THR ILDESTAX W CRI3ED O THPREINITYA:0 D DECLARING TEXAS,
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECFION I,
the lith the ofniJanuary,o1W, aatanoAnpendle0 to the Code eod
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under provisions of
Ordinanca No. 69•I, he, and tl:e sans Is hereby amended as
followsl
All the hereinafter +iscribad pro arty is hereby removsl
fron the A3ricultu'31 "A" District as show,: on said Zonino Map,
and all provision-, of Ordinance No, 69.1, adopted the Il h dal'
of January, 1959, as nmondal$ shill hereafter army to 9.114
as ethor proprlreytlocatedrinthe"Lill
Lif,,ht Industlrialh"Lill Di~trlct
{ anJ more particularly damcrihed as COlt INS:
I:7ir.9 all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and
being situated In tho Cor:nty of Denton, State of Texas, and
heingg part of the J. S. Collard Survey, 0stract No. 297, tha
A. :,hies Surveyy, Abstract No, 1116 ad the N. Wade Survey,
Absrract No. 1407, airJ °9ing more Partlellarly described followi:
ZMIYVt:IB at a port In the axistlnq Denloi City limits Line as
oftabilshed by Ordtnance No, 65.41, sald roam of haainning
also bolni the southo,ast corner or the J. S. Collard §urvwe
A':ftr9 t `.e, 291, m.-td also Ming t::3 rust westorly south!re~t
corlsr of the T. Tcby Survty, ASstr'w No, 1:59 srd lylns In
tl;a centoriinc of Rlnoy Road;
HENCE north 130 37' I5" voxt along the 0011th SOlladary lane
of said 1. S. Collard 5urvoy, 91mo t.oing the co'itarline of
tia9y Road a Jlstaade of IW I foot to • point for a corner la
the nor:hnast right of 'ray lino of 11. S. highway 17;
f THr",CE .101;1: S1'3 n91 53" r;ast aloe! rho northelat right of
Itne of rl. S, Ht;h',ra: '7, a 41111-,:9 of .9,51.11 feat to a
F?!:?,CE ,Wort?~ 390 9P' 39" alo.1,• t:19 nar:h:as: ri;'t: of
j r ling of U. S, Hijhw;k• 77 n dlst,inc-! if 3; 01 feet to a
oint for a -orner 91,1: being tSe ao11t?l earner of 1 corner
:JtoPr 1. ao prafctt intaratr.tan of north9ast li,ts of U.
i n, iE;1,;1y kteh ihi tact right of !:,r+• lino of Bonnie Brae
rltf;ACC north 290 ri:' 91" xe9t ato.1; 41j] corner cuGOff lilt a
Ji it.,nc^ ri :S.J? fc~t :9 , -flint to`r 1 ,::rr, ;
C1FrsC'c 10r:h 00 1^.' 1"' cast zton3 tha •%ast rfAht of way !ins
of BanOte 3r,11 1a'd a difta=e of 2nl_.?1 fats to a mint for n
clrnor;
i F l.r%r. south 9')0 3S' 03" east a .liit ,:a 0f .:Ili. 'It feet to a
Imi 0; f;r a -r'1!r itliv 411" 1h)UR I1rY 1Ena 71, 51jd F, S.
~otllr. 9Y,
~ ` ~ Fc'+? Sur;~ same being ;I~e ';!st nr:• lino of aaEd F,
1
.
i
i
a ;1l~C1 ssuth Collard So' Survey, cst 91011 the east boundary line of
s 1!-1 by
j same belnv the .rest boundary line of
THE..NCE T, south 5 00°rvoye+a dlsearteo of 1,16S.OS feet to a pol.tt;
S. 09 cost along eha east boundary tine of
said J. S. Collard Survey, soma beingq the west boundary line of
sald T. Toby Survey, a distance of 3D75.59 feet to tho place of
be;inningg and contalning 13,719,M55.75 square feet of land,
morn or less.
SECTiOY U.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Taxis hershy
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan far the purpose of ppromoting the general wmlfore of the
et
:ty her ofthingsonforxthe character efsothel districteCandortfor mini
peculisr suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the pbuildings, protecting human lives, the maximum benefitgto themCity of DentonteTexuss f land or is. a d its cltitens,
"C"O' III.
That this ordinance shall he in _'till force and effect
immediately after its poseso and approval, the .•equlred pabllc
Commisiion+aanugtherCityocou council i+Ofd tho city Pof nDenton, Texas,
aftor living due notice thereof.
A. DPASSD AND APPROVED this the day of
I
i
C"'f Or DESTOV, TEXAS
A r rEST:
I
t a c
CITY OP DE,YTO1, TEXAS
j
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL F0%f
C I n"oF;DE\TOV, R 111S TI 1TTdR'iEY
i
.
F
"P,': `!.l Cu'i'S f"DTI; UStE:7Tj)•P,IG: 'i
r
a
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
I-1408
N FAVOR IN OPPOSITION
UNDECIDED
Rich Marufacturin9 Co.
R. B. Rich
Rt. 5 Box 24
Denton, Tx 76201
Sarworth Corporation
Henry W. ?ern Jr,
1204 University
Denton, Tx 76201
Kenton E. Macintyre
P.O. Box 47
Denton, Tx 76201
Hoyt Cole
501 Headlee
Denton, Tx 76201
S, E. Rayzor
Route 5
1711 Riney Road
Denton, Tx 76201
Ruth Kellum
2016 Georgetown
Denton, Tx 76201
Ruby Finch
i 6138 Winton
Dallas, Tx 75214
t
t
I ~
I
f
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Case. No. Z-1403
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and
return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing.
f City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 16201
If 20% or more of the property, owners receiving this notice return a
reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply,
form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, those com-
ments are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Counci:
If your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this form to notify us concerning your position.
If you have questions pertaining to tha case, please call the Planning
Office at 5b6-6350.
I
Please use BLACK ink only,
since blue ink cannot be xaroxed. Cn
REPLY
( I am in favor of this zoning request.
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request. ~J
` ( ) I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows:
1
Signature tit
Address
Phone " Q~
i
REPLY FOR THE CITY CCUYCIL
Case. :to. 2-1408
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning pppl1etition.
by please
return itto desire the followsng an
address opinion,
the s date of complete the this
public Phearing and
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
If 20: or more of the property owners receiving this notice return a
reply form in opposition to the proposed change,
the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply.
form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, those com-
ments are a sufficient response and will be presented to the Clty Council
if your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this form to notify us concerning your position.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 56b-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only,
since blue ink cannot be xeroxed.
REPLY
I am in favor of this zoning request.
9a
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request.
ra
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows;
Si3nature
Address
Phone - ,
iY
i
I
Y
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Case. No. Z-1408
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and i
return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing.
i
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return a
reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply
form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, those com-
ments are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Counci:
if your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this form to notify us concerning your position.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only,
since blue ink cannot be xeroxed. }
I
REPLY
( ✓f I am in favor of this zoning request,
( } I am opposed to this zoning request.
( } I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows:
I
i
I
I
Signature
Address
Prone
i
a
rc
i
I
REPV FOR THE PLANNING AND ZON7 ; Co*frSSION
Case No. Z-1408
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete
this regly form and return it to the following address b the d ate of
the public hearing, q
City Planner 1
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
i Denton, Texas 7620L
This raplq form is no way affects your rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if
they wish. If 20% or more of the propertq owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in oposition to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the planning {
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BIiCK ink cnlq,
REPLY
ram in favor of this zoning request, i
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request.
I am undecided about this zoning request,
My commatts are as follows:.
I
1
i
I
Signature •----r.~.
I
Address
Phone
1
t
E
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COXMISSION
Case No. Z-1408
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
ca., in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete
this re ly form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if
that' wish. If 20% or more of the propertq owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in oppposition to the proposed change, the. City
Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning.
Offica at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only.
REPLY 7 ~98fl
I am in favor of this zoning request.
( ) r am opposed to this zoning request.
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows:.
Signature
Address
Phone
s
tl
r
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COKIISSION
Case No. Z-1408
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If eu desire toexpress an opinion
com
this reply form and return it to the fllowing address 'bylethe asedatepofte
the public hearing,
City Planner
---~1 Municipal Building
215 Ezst McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if
their wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it.
I£ you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planninp,
Office at 566:-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only.
REPLY RECEIVED FES 2 9 1980
I am in favor of this zoning request.
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request.
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request.
My consents are as follows i .
Signature Qtr
Address
Phone w y r-
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION ,
Case No. Z-1408
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete
this re ly form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing,
City Planner l
215s
Denton, 1
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects
hear-
ing and we encourage all interested partiesttotattendnand coimant ifethey- wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACX ink only-
REPLY
I am in favor of this zoning request.
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request.
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as followsi.
- L-1
41
Le )4
F Signature
Address
1 i
Phone
M -
i
i
I
i
I
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 5, 1980
This is the regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission held
un March 5, 1980 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
1 PRESENT: Bill Brady, Marilyn Gilchrist, Robert La Forte, Linnie McAdams,
Carolyn Busby, Andy Sidor, and Richard Taliaferro. Staff members
were John Lavretta, Charles Watkins, Rick Svehla, and Sue Wigand.
ABSENT: None.
1. Approve the minutes of the February 20, 1980 meeting.
Motion was made by Taliaferro and seconded by La Forte to approve the
minutes. Motion carried unanimously.
It. Consideration:
A. Z-1436. This is the petition of Mr. Jack Brown and of Mr. Neil
Hill, general partner, Duncan Properties Ltd., requesting Planned
Development (PD) zoning classification for development of a shopping
center complex, office and warehouse complex, and mini-warehouse
complex on a tract approximately 32 acres in size.
Roger Shipmen, attorney for Brown and Hill, spoke in favor of the
request.
David Wilson, representing the Henry S. Miller Co., sppoke in
opposition to the request, stating that there was still a dispute
over a strip of land and the court would decide upon the ownership.
Mr, Wilson also objected to the curb cut.
City Engineer, Rick Svehla, stated that he did not feel it was fair
to hold up Duncan Properties since the Miller Co. has not submitted
a plat to the Planning Department.
Mr. NO 1 Hill spoke in rebuttal.
The Commission discussed the case.
Motion was made by Taliaferro and seconded by Sidor to appprove Z-1436
with conditions as written, Approved by a vote of 6 to 1.
III. A. Z-1408, This is the petition of the Planning and Zoning Commission
requesting Light Industrial (LI) zoning classification on a tract approxi-
mately 314.9 acres in size. The property is located on the north side
of Highway 77, adjacent and east of Bonnie Brae Road, This tract has
approximately 4,434 feet of frontage along Highway 77 extending westward
from the Riney Road - Highway 77 intersection and is contiguous with the
city limits approximately in the centerline of Riney Road, (This property
is owned by Texas Instruments.)
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 5, 1980
Page 2
John Lavretta spoke, on behalf of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
in favor of the request.
No one spoke in opposition. 1
Motion was made by Bill Brady and seconded by Andy Sidor to approve Z-1408.
Motion carried unanimously. J
B. Z-1441. This is the petition of Ms. Karen Nash requesting an
amendment to a Planned Development ON for detached single family houses
on 45' X 100 ' lots to permit multi family (MF-R) development on a tract
approximately 7 acres in size. The tract is located on the north side
of the proposed Windsor extension, and approximately 125 feet west of
Stuart Road,
Karen Nash spoke in favor of the request.
a
No one spoke in opposition.
John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation.
No one spoke in rebuttal.
E
The Commission discussed the case.
i
Motion was made by Sidor and seconded by Taliaferro to deny Z-1441.
Motion carried unanimously,
C. Z-1442. This is the petition of Mr. Charles Glasgow requesting
a change of toning from Agricultural (A) to Commercial (C) zoning
classification on a parcel approximately 26.4 acres in size which begins
at the southwast corner of Loop 288 and Audra Lane, The property has
approximately 909 feet of frontage along the west side of Loop 288 and
approximately 1030.9 f4et of frontage along the south side of Audra ln.
Charles Glasgow, petitioner, spoke in favor of the request.
Frank Cawthon, realtor, spoke in favor of the request.
Leonard Morris, representing the owner of the property zoned SF-10
across loop 2881 spoke in favor of the request.
Robin Butt, 1807 Audra Lane, spoke in opposition to the request.
T, Holland spoke in opposition to the request.
John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation.
Charles Glasgow spoke in rebuttal.
The Commission discussed the case with Charles Glasgow, stating the
zoning change request would be more desireable if the proposed Commercial
development included only the frontage along Loop 288 1 also it
s
. _.,i
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 5, 1980
Page 3
would be desireable if a transition, such as multi
between the proposed single family area t family
commercial development along Loop 288 was provided
o the west and
the proposed
Motion was made by Sidor and seconded by Taliaferro to deny Z-1442
Motion carried 5 to 1 with 1 abstention.
r--~ .
i 1V• Considerations:
A. Consider the final plat of Skyline Addition,
Ross Melton spoke in favor of the plat.
Motion was made by La Forte and seconded by Gilchrist to approve the
final plat of the Skyline Addition, Motion carried unanimously.
8• Consider the final plat of Solar Way Addition.
Charles Watkins stated the staff recommended approval.
Motion was made by Taliaferro and seconded by Gilchrist to approve
the final plat of Solar Way Addition, Motion carried unanimously.
C. Consider the oreliminary, plat of plaza 288 Addition,
This plat was withdrawn by Charles Glasgow,
D.
Consider the final replat of Ruddell Addition,
i
Charles Watkins gave the staff recommendation of approval.
Motion was made by La Forte and seconded by Andy Sidor to approve
r
the final replat of Ruddell Addition, motion carried unanimously,
C. Consider the preliminary plat of itimbleton Village Phase Two.
Charles Watkins stated that 2 additional valves and electrical easements
are needed and recommended approval contingent upon this conuition,
Motion was made by Sidor and seconded by Busby to approve the Preliminary
unanimously, inary
Plat of Wimbleton Village Phase Two with the condition, Motion approved
F. COnSider disposition of lot 2A, 8lock 3, Heritage Oaks Addition.
John Lavrett9 reported that the Parks and Recreation Department desi
to keep the land.
res
Motion was made by Sidor and seconded by Carol to recommend that the
~11Y keep the land, Motion carried unanimously,
~T
141nutes ~
Planning and Zoning Commission
ih March 5, 1980
Page 4
` 3. Consider disposition of excess city property at 517 E. Prairie Street.
John Lavretta recommended disposition,
Motion was made by Taliaferro and seconded by G17christ to recommend
that the Council dispose of the property. Motion carried unanimously.
4 ~ The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
{
1
t
{
t
i
i
M E M O R A N D U Ms
DATEi March 26, 1980 ~i
i
102 Hill Angelo
r--~ FROMI Nancy Soen~
SUBJECTo Procedure Changes
I
The attached will be an additional agenda item. It
needs to be place on your agenda as soon as possible.
i
r
i
i
i
i
t
r
i
I
i
s
I i
z
I
I March 26, 1980
h i
PROCEDURE CHANGES
The Parks and Recreation Department recently revised some
fees, charges and policies which pertained to the Athletic
Division. They were approved by the City Council on
December 18, 1979. At that time it was recommended by the
Parks and Recreation Director that non-Denton teams who
wished to play in the Denton leagues request approval not
only from the Parks and Racreation Board, but also from the
City Council. This procedure is both time consuming and
cumbersome for all parties involved. I recommend that
requests of this nature be handled administratively thus
eliminating action required by our Board and the Council
Your consideration and recommendation on this matter will
be appreciet►+.
i
I
f
i
I
i
I
j
{
I
i
i
M
..g
I
I
I
i
i
If CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM I
TOs Mayor 5 Council Members
FROMs Bill Angelo, Administrative Assistant
DATEr March 27, 1980
SUBJECTS Agenda item f3 - Ordinance Authorizing Issuance of
Certificates of Obligation
I
As you know, the documents for this item are being prepared by
the City's financial advisor, First Southwest Company, and are
unavailable at the present time. These documents will ba hand
delivered as soon as they become available.
'I
Bill Angelo
I BAsjm
I
I
i
I
t
MEMORANDUM
TOi King Cole
FROM; .loella Orr
DATE; March 26, 1980
Bids were received for the proposed library expansion
today. Our-architect will investigate the low bidders
and present his recomendation to the City Council at
their regular weeting Tuesday April 1.
i
i
e
s
fi
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 1, 1980 ,
A ends item;
Consider adopting an ordinance instituting final action regarding the request
of Mr, H. S. Osborne for annexation and Agricultural (A) zoning classification
on a tract approximately 31,5 acres in size. The property has approximately 40
feet of frontage along the east side of Country Club Road (FM 1830) and begins
approximately ?800 feet south of the intersection of Hobson Road and FM 1830.
(The Planning and Zoning ConxnlssiOn recommends approval.)
' The petition of Mr. H, S. Osborne for annexation and Agricultural (A) zoning
classification on a 31.5 acre tract comes before the City Council for final action ime, P
at this lanningtand Zoning Commissionaando ptheeCitytCouncll,candaallgstateere ulrement
regarding annexation have been met. 4 is
s
Recommendation;
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this request
at its meeting of October 11, 1919,
Action Re aired:
IM The City Council should move to adopt the annexation and zoning ordinance
i by the City Attorney, prepared
Exhibits:
A. Memo
B. Ordinance
C. Map
I
i
4
Z
I
Ordinance No,
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DcNTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 37.538 ACRESr OF LAND LYING An
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
IN THE T. J. MARTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 000, DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the petition of H. S. OSBOR,NE; and
WHEREAS# an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on February S, 1980 for all interested persons to
state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation
provided by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of r'. City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective dote, and after the public heartassi
NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, 1
HEREBY II
SECTION It
That the herainatter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the semi is
made heroby a part of sold City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by
the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may
T
hereafter be onacted and the property situated therein shall be
subject to and shall bear Ica prorate part of the taxos lsvLed by
the City, The tract of lied hereby annexed It described as
tollows, to-wit;
All tho` certain lots tract or parcol of land sltuatsd in the T
J. (Martin Surva 0 Abstract No. 900, Denton County, Tires, heing
tha same (callod) 31.73 mere tract described In a deed from VAltor
P. Ross at ux to H. S. Osborne et ux an February 17, Im
rocorded In Volume 31S, Pale 337, bold Records of said County, and
balms wore particularly described as follows!
SCGINHING at a fence corner at the northeast corner of said tract
o,, the east boundary lino of said Martin Survey;
'eC of South
lin
Said 3 rvey' 31311, 9,3S JOEunt wl to1 a ssteeltoned n atri a feneia.ornai
nt tfis southeast corner of iald trust;
A
s
TtiE,~C& south 89' S6' S3" west with said
fence corner; fence 1957.30 feet to a
THENCE north ISO 361 S9" west with said Eenca 23.6 Feet to a
fence corner at tioe South southwest Corner of said tract;
THENCE north 00 35' 35" east with Bald Eenee 761.95 foot to a
fence Corner on the soutls line of a tone;
TRENCH south $90 40' 3S^ west with said fence 640.75
fence corner post at the west southwest feet to ¢
corner of said tract o
the oast right of way of P.R. Road 1830;
TH$YCM north 20 19' west with said right of way 40,pl feet to a
fenCa corner at the northwest corner of said tract;
THENCE north ago 34, 46" east with saki fence 1616.76 feet to
the place of besinninq and containing
More or less. in all 37,538 acres of land,
SECTION 11.
The above described property is hereby Classified as
i
Agricultural "A" District and Shall so appear an the official
toning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map to hereby
nmonded accordingly,
SECTIOY 11I,
This ordinance shall be effective Immadistely upon its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
r A, 0. 1980.
A ,
CITY 08 D ON, TEXAS
ATTEST,
C[TYn0:t DENTON, Tfi~EIAitY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR JR. CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTEN, HIAS
i
BY:
l
r
1I
~ r
1y ~ '
F
7
t
I
No.
AN J^uINANCE OF THB CIT1' OF 1 DENTON, TEXAS REMOViNg ON
UU'jS CLRTAIY PORTIONS OF CR PARKING
ESCENT AND FULTON STREETS BETWEEN THE
P
PORTI UN olvjDf.NtG FORD DIEFI RE40 ALa OF PARKIriGMONDAY
AYYT1MEHp UGH CERTAIN
Atll''1'! fE ON FOR THE
F R%THE
ES'tAhLISHMENT OF A FIVE MINUTE STANDING ONLY ZONE ON A CERTAIN
ANUPORTIO14FOUNDN OF STRE PARKINGVIONNGT OSE aCERTAINY ORTIONSANOP
PRUVDING I CRESCENT AND rULTON STREETS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING PENALTIES; PROVIDINGNFORPUBLICATIONRAND THEREOF;
EFFECTIVE DATE,
FHEREAS, the City Council after Careful conslecration of the
matter and upon the recommendation of the Traffic Safety
Comllsslon of the City of Denton, finds it necessary and
justified to remove parking and establish regulatlonn governing
parking on the certain portions of Crescent and Fulton streets
morn fully described bolow In order to insure the safety and
welfare of motorists and pedestrians regularly using the said
streets for travel and to insure adequits emergency parking
space for fire and police vehicles or other outhorited emergency
vohtcles; now, therefore,
TdC CITY COUNCIL OF THP CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREAY ORDAINS:
SFC'fION t.
(e) That hoth the north and south sides of Crescent Street
frn.r Its Intersection with Fulton Etroet to its intsrseetlon
wit': rlalone Street except along the south side of Crescent
Street from Its Intersection with Fulton Street to a
point
approximately 290 feet west ahn11 not be used for the parking of
vehicles or in on), other manner ho obstructed between the hours
of 8:00 A.M. and 000 P.M. on Monday through Friday, and the
nano shall be so pasted with signs or markings or both by the
:
proper authorities of tho city of Denton, Texas.
(h) That the south lids of crescent street from its
Intersection Pith Fulton street to a point Approximately 290
teat west shell not be used for the parking of vehicles or In
any other manner be obstructeJ at nnytime, and the same shill be
so posted with slgns or markings nr both by the proper
authorities of the City of Denton, Texas.
h
W ?R
r S
t, r
tc1 That both the seat and west Sides of Fulton Street from
tta intersection with Crescent street to its Intersection with
Llndt~n optrect shall not be used for the parking of
In any other manner be obstructed between vahfc2eS or
the hours of SiOO A.M.
posend 4 ted 00 with m. on Monday through Friday, and the same Shall be so
signs or markings or both by the proper authorities
of the city of Denton, Texas,
(d) that the seat aide of Fulton Street from !to inter.
section with Linden Street to its Intersection With Broadway
street Shall not be used for the parking of vehicles or in any
other manner be obstructed at anytime, and the same shall be Su
posted vlth signs or markings or both by the proper °uthoritles
of the City of Denton, Taxer.
(e) That a "five minute standing only" bone IS hereby
•rtabllShed on the west Bide of Fulton Street between the two
marked crosswalk,, located !r, front of the Denton public N1gA
SChooi and extending from the west to the east aide of Fulton
Strut, and the Same aholl not be used for the parking of
vehicles end shall be so posted with signs
by the or markings or both
proper authorlties of the City of Denton, Texas.
SEC 10N 22.
That Ir, the event any vehicle, except an euthorlssd
emargsney vehicle ar police or fire vehicle, Shall be found
parked In or upon the certain portions of Crescent and Fulton
streets so described in Section 2 of this ordinance
shall be removed or caused to be removed by the rams
and taken to some y any Po.lce officer
plans duJgnated or maintained by tho pollee
department for Such purpose and kept until application for
redemption is made by the owner or his authorized agent or other
person legally entltled to
possession of such vehicle pursuant
to the provlalons of Section 21.131 of the Denton Code of
Ordinances, a amended,
SSC 10! tit,
That 11 any "Ctlon, subsection, paragraph, sentenct,
clause, p;iraae or word In this ordinance, or application thereof
z
to any pefson or a!reumrtanaes Is held invalid by any court of
corp.tent }urJOICtlon, ouch holding shall not affect the
p
01
4
it , ~ - . _ _ ~
i
I
i
validlty of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares It
wr.,,;d hzve enacted such remaining portions despite any such
Invalidity.
SECTION IV.
r~ That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the
provisions of this ordinance become affective which are incon-
sistent or 171 conflict with the terms or provisions contained in
this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such
conflict.
SECTION V,
That is is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person to
i
park any vehicle except an authorised emergency vehicle of
police or fire vehicle on any portion of the above described
streets se Is posted or marked by the proper authorities of the
City of Denton, and that Section 1-5 of the Denton Code of
Ordinancot, as amended, is incorporated into this ordinance as
if eat out in full herein, and the penalty by fine not to exceed
TwO Hundred Dollars (0200.00) is applicable hereto for each
separate Want*.
t SECTION
I
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (11)
? days from the dote of its passage, and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be ,
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official
newspaper of the city of Denton, Taxes, with'r ten (101 days of
the data of its passage,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the ~ day of
1980, ~
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
rA6)tiB 10 y G TY RR TA~'+i
CIVY Or b.MTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR, JR.t CITY ATTORNEY
C1TY OP DENTON, TEXAS
BYE
,
i
i
CITY OF DEYTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 26, logo
TO, NIL at and City council, City Manager
4 Director of Community Development
FROM; C, J. Taylur, Jr.
CItY Attorney
SUBJECT; Amendments to Proposed Historic Landmark
Ordinance Landm
amendeda followint trhtosM'dchHltitor19,D Lac ncll metitfn`"' The
following changes have been made
1. Paragraph (c) on PASO 4 has been changed to provide for two
Year tors for members of the landmark commission,
2. Paragraph (d) on Paso S has been changed by adding the
Chairmen of the Denton County Historic Commission as an ex
officio member of the commits A.
Paragraph (d) on Page 6 has been deleted which required a
decision by the commission on whether the commission would
recommend that a persons property be Included in a
dellgnated plan. This is unnecessary since the ordinance
desig itid das now hIsto le"landmiik withoutpet>ti eonieRt of
the owners of the land.
i following: W CA Page a ha bean emended by adding the
l except that no propp arty shall be inclupuded In any
tie orlc landmark`wit`hout thegconsentrof`ehe owner
of the land,
i
CLTJR:js
v
a
S
N0.
AK ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX H OF THE CODETY
CI OF 0^DIKANCES, THE
ORDIN
COMPAEHEVSriE 20N'ING ANCE, OF THE OF DENTON TEXAS
El' ADDING TO APPENDIX B A Nn' ARTICLE 28A '~iITLED "ARTICLE $R
HISTORIC LANDMARK PRESERVATION"
LANDMARK; CREATING A HISTORIC LANDMARKICOM~1lSSON AND~1 PROti'ID1NG
T
FOR 10N IT F POWERS AND LANDWKS ILBY i THE 04CITYG DR ESTABLISHING
CRITERIA FOR USE IN DETERMINING HISTORIC LAMA K DESIGNATIONS;
HISTORICAL LAwEDHARKS;R WI INGLTHE POVERISLAYD AUTOHORI Y1OOFL Of
PLANN':NG AND ZONING COFDIISStOF OVER HISTORIC LAVDAWWKS AND OF
THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING THAT HISTORIC LAVDb F DESIGNATIONS
SHALL NOT AFFECT PRESENT ZONING USES; PROVIDING A PENALTY.
k'HEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas has a history and a
heritage unique and different from any other city In Texas
which Is worthy of civic pride and preservation; and
WHEREAS, tht Cit' Council recognizes its responsibility to
preserve and protect places and trots In the City of historical
end cultural importance and significancA for the general
welfare of the community;
NOW THEREFORE, THE. COUNCIL OF :HE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY 6ADAI',5:
SECTION 1,
Appendix B of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton,
Texas, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinenee of the City of
Denton, is hereby amended by adding to Appendix B a new Article
21A to hereafter read is follows; y
ARTICLE 21A HISTORIC LANDHAAK PRESERVATION,
Section 21A-1. "HISTORIC LANDMARK" DEFINED
As us+d in this article, the term "historic landmark" rhall
mean any building, structure, site, district, area, or land of
architectural, historical, archaeological or cultural
importance or valut, which the city council determines shall be
protected, enhanced, and prtservad in the interest of the
culture, prosperity, education and peneral wtlfart of the
people.
Section 21A•2. DECLARII'ON OF POIV Y,
the city council hereb. finds and declares as a matter of
public policy that the protection, enhancement, preservation
4~
i~
and use of historic landmarks is a public necessity and Is
required in the interest of the culture, prosperity, education
and general welfare of the people. The purposes of this
chapter are;
(a) To protect, enhance and perpetuate historic landmarks
which represent or reflect distinctive and important elements
of the cityIs and state's architectural, archaeological,
cultural, social, economic, ethnic and political history and to
develop appropriate settings for such places.
(b) To safeguard the city,$ historic and cultural
heritage, as embodied and reflected in such historic landmarks
by appropriate regulations.
(c) To stabilize and improve property values in such
locations.
(d) To foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplish-
ments of the past.
(e) To protect end enhance the city's attractions to
tourists and visitors and provide incidental support and
stimulus to business and industry.
{f) To strengthen the economy of the city.
(g) To promote the use of historic landmarks for the
culture, prosperity, educatio and general welfare of the
people of the city and visitors of the
Section 2SA•3, hISrORIC LANDMARKS-DESIGNATION.
The city council may designate buildings, structures,
sites, districts, areas and lands in the city as historic
landmarks and define, amend and delineate the boundaries
thereof. The suffix "H" shall Indicate the zoning designation
of those buildings, structures, sites, districts, areas and
lands which the city council designate as historic lsndmsrks.
Such designation shall be in addition to any other use
designation eitsb1ished in the comprehensive zoning ordinance.
The toning map shall rtlfect the designation of a historic
landmark by the letter "H" as a suffix to any other use
vw_
a
designation established under the comprehensive toning
ordinance.
Section 26A•4. SAME-CRITERIA TO HE USED IN DESIGNATIONS.
In making such designations as set forth in Section 2BA-3,
the City council shall consider, but shall no be limited to,
one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Character, interest or value as pert of the develop-
tent, heritage er cultural characteristics of the City of
Denton, State of Texas, or the United States.
(b) Recognition as a recorded Texas historic landmark, a
national historic landmark, or entered into the National
degister of Historic Places.
(c) Embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an
architectural type or specimen.
(d) Identification as the work of an architect or master
builder whose Individual work has Influenced the development of
the c1ty.
(e) Embodiment of elements of architectural design,
detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent o
significant architectural innovation.
(f) Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or
areas which are eligible for preservation according to a plan
based on architectural, historic or cultural motif.
(g) Portrayal of the environment of a group of people in
an area of history characterized by a distinctive architectural
Atylt.
(A) Archaeological value in that it has produced or can be
expected to produce data effecting theories of historic or
prehistoric interest.
(I) Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social,
ethnic or historical heritage of the city, Stott or United
States.
PAGE 3
P
v.
n
I
(j3 Location as the site of a significant historic event,
(i;) Idell' fiCat IOn With a person or persons who ~I
significantly contributed to the culture and development of tLe
city, State or United States.
(1) A building or structure that because of its location
has become of value to a neighborhood, community area, or the
city,
(m) Value is an aspect of community sentiment or public
pride,
Section 28A•5. HISTORIC LANDMARK CONNISSIDN- CREATED.
(a) There is hereby created a commission to be known as
the Historic Landmark Commission of the City of Denton, here- ff
inafttr called the "landmark commission," composed of nine 1
members appointed by the city council. The landmark commission
shell Include at least one representative from each of the
following organisations or professions;
(1) Denton County Historical Commission,
(1) the Denton County Bar Association.
(7) An Architect,
(a) A Certified Public Accountant.
(S) An owner of real property in the City.
(b) The other members of the landmark commission shall be ,
appointed from such other Individuals end organizations as the
city council may In its discretion wish to consult or consider,
provided that no one business or professional interest shall
constitute a majority membership of the commission.
(c) Members of the landmark commission shall be appointed
for two year terms, except that the original representatives
1
from the five fields of expertise shall serve for a term of two
years, and all other original members of the landmark
commission shall be appointed for a one year term. Thereafter
all members of the landmark commission shall be appointed for
two year terms. Vacancies in an unexpired term shall be fillet?
by the city council for the remainder of the term.
PAGE 1
{
I
(d) In addition to the nine members appointed by the cite
councll, the following persons or their designates shall sit on
the landmark commission Is ex officio members:
1. The Director of Planning of the City of Denton.
2. The Building Official of the City of Denton.
3. The Chairman of the Denton County Historical
Commission .
(a) None of the ex officio members shall have voting
power, but shall assist the landmark commission in its various
functions.
(f) The landmark commission shall meet as often as
necessary to dispose of the business of the commission or upon
call by the commission chairman or upon petition of a simple
majority of commission members. Five members present shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and all
issues shall be decided by a majority of those members present
and voting, except that in those instances where only a quorum
of fire is present at a meeting, all Issues shall be decided by
at least four affirmative votes. The commission shall adopt
j
appropriate rules and regulations for the conduct of its
business and the election of its chairman and other officers.
The minutes of each meeting shall be filed in the office of the
city secretary.
F
(g) The city attorney shall he the legal advisor for the
Historic Landmark Commission.
(h) The fact that one or more representatives from the
five fields of expertise may not at any given point be a member
s
of the landmark commission, for whatever reason or reasons,
shall not affect the validity of any decision or act of the
commission.
Section 21A•6. SAME-FUNCTION.
(a) The landmark commission shall thoroughly familiarise
itself with buildings, structures, sites, districts, areas and
lands within the city which may be eligible for designation as
PAGE I
historic landmarks end shall prepare an historic landmark {
preservation plan, hereinafter referred to as the "preservation
plan," which shell:
(1) Establish criteria to be used in determining
whether certain buildings, structures, sites, districts, areas,
lands and other objects should be designated as historic
Iindn arks.
(2) Establish guidelines to be used in determination
of whether to grant or deny certificates of appropriateness and
certificates of demolition or removal.
(3) Formulate a program for private and public action
which will state the role of various city agencies in
preservation of historic landmarks.
y {4) Suggest sources of funds for preservation and
restoration activities and acquisitions, to include federal
sources, state sources, private and foundation sources, as well
as municipal sources.
(S) Recommend to the proper agencies incentives
designed to encourage historical preservation.
(b) The preservation plan shell be presented to the city
planning commission for consideration and recommendation to the +
city council for inclusion in the comprehensive plan of the
city.
(c) The landmark commission :hell recommend to the city
planning commission ordinances designating certain buildings,
structures, sites, districts, areas and lands in the city as
s
historic landmarks, except that no property aAall be included `
in any proposed ordinance designating any property as a
historic landmark without the consent of the owner of the
lend. The landmark commission shall hold a public hearing on {
all proposed ordinances Ind the owner of any land included in
the proposed ordinance shall be given at least ten days written
notice of the public hearing.
i Pr,GE 6 ~
~ I
1
,
(d) If the landmark commission finds that buildings,
structures, sites, districts, lands cr areas cannot be
preserved without acquisition, the lsndmsrk commission mad'
recommend to the city council that the fee or a lesser interest I
Of the property in question be acquired by gift, devise, 1
purchase, eminent domain or otherwise, pursuant to the city
charter and state and federal law.
(e) Where there are conditions Lndtr which the required
preservation of a historic landmark would cause undue hardship
on the owner or owners, use district changes may be -ecommended
by the landmark commission.
( f ) The designation of a historic landmark may be amended
or removed using the same procedure provided in this article
for the original designation.
(g) The landmark commission shall provide information and
counseling to owners of designated historic landmarks.
Section 28A•7. ACTION BY THE CITY PLANYle'G COMMISSION.
3 (a) The city planning commission shall hold public
hearings as provided for In Article 1011!, Vernon's Annotated
Texas Statutes, to consider an,V historical landmark designation
ordinance after recelving a recommendation for the landmark
commission. The notices provided for in Article 1011f shall be
sent to all owners of property which is proposed for "H"
designation as well as to
the adjoining property owners
specified in said article. I
(b) Kithin thirty days after the hearing, the city
planning commission shall set forth In writing its recommen-
dation, including the findings of fact that constitute the s
basis for its decision, and shall transmit Its recommendation
concerning the proposed ordinance to the city council along
with the recommendation of the landmark commission.
Section }sA-g. RECORDING OF DESIGNATION.
Upon passage of a historic landmark designation ordinance.
by the City Council, the city secretary shall file a copy of
PAGF
r
{I
I
I
the ordinance with C' t-0 and Denton County Tax Assessors
together with a notice briefly stating the fast of the
deslgnation W shall send a cop), of such notice to the owner
or owners of the affected Property by certified mail.
Section 2&A•9, EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS AND CHANGES-CERTIFICATE
OF APPROPRIATENESS ORDINARY REPAIR OR
MAINTENANCE, APPEAL.
No person or entity shall construct, reconstruct, alter,
change, restore, remove or demolish any exterior architectural
feature of a Designated historic landmark unless application be
made to the landmark commission for a certificate of
appropriateness and such a certificate be granted. As used in
this article, the term "exterior architectural feature" shall
include but not be limited to architectural style and general
arrangement of such portion of the exterior of a structure as
is designed to be open to view from o public way.
(a) Procedure when building permit is requirod:
(1) When applying for a building permit for the
exterior of a designated historic landmark, the applicant shall
submit two copies of all detailed plans, elevations
perspec-
tives, specifications and other documents pertaining to the
work to the building official, who shall forward such
application to the commission chairman. Any applicant may
appear at a regular or special meeting of the landmark
commission before submitting an application and may consult
with said commission during the review of the permit
application. s
(2) The landmark commission, upon ten days written
n+tice to the applicant, shall hold a hearing on the appli•
cation. Upon review of the application, if the landmark
` commission finds the proposed wort. of a nature which will not
adversely affect any significant architectural or historical
feature of the designated historic landmark, and is appropriate
PAGE g
M
I
f ~
I
and consistent with the spirit and purposes of this article, it
shall forward a certificate of appropriateness to the building
official after the public hearing and the building official
E shall so advise the applicant after the certificate is received.
I
If the landmark commission finds that the pro-
posed work will adversely affect or destroy any significant
architectural or historical feature of the designated historic
landmark or is inappropriate or inconsistent with the spirit
and purposes of this article, it shall notify the building
official that the application has been disapproved and shall
notify the applicant of the disapproval and of the changes in
the application which ire necessary to secure the approval of
i
the application,
(A) If no action has been token by the landmark
commission within sixty days of original receipt by the
landmark commission, a certificate of appropriateness shall be
deemed issued by the landmark commission, end the building
I official shall so advise the applicant.
(S) No change shall be made in the application for any
building permit after issuance of a certificate of appropriate-
ness without resubmittal to the landmark commission and
approval thereof in the some manner as provided above. '
(6) After a decision is reached by the landmark
commission denying on application for a certificate of appro-
pristeness, a resubmittal of application will not he accepted
for additional hearing within a twelve-month period from the
date of final decision except upon written request by the
applicant indicating that there has been a change in conditions
or that all changes in the application as recommended by the
landmark commission have been made.
(b) Procedure when building permit is not required:
(1) Those proposed exterior changes and alterations
not requiring a building permit shall he submitted in writing
PACE 9
e
'r.
directly to the historic landmarl: commission for a certffCate
r of appropriateness which must be granted before such work can
be undertaken.
Applicant shall submit a Copy of all proposed alterations
and changes to the commission. The appllutlon must
specifically describe the alteration or Change proposed. Any
applicant may appear At a regular or special meeting of the
landmark commission before submitting en application and may
consult 'I 'h said commission during the review of the
application.
The landmark commission, upon ten days written
notice to the applicant, shall hold a
s hearing on the
aPPIlcatton. Upon review of the application, SE the landmark
commission finds the proposed work of a nature which will not
adversely affect any significant architectural or historical
feature of a designated historic landmark and is appropriate
and consistent with the spirit and purposes of this article, It
shall forward a certificate of appropriateness to the applicant
,
within thirty days of the receipt of said application.
(3) It the landmark commission finds that the pro- ,
posed work will adversely affect or destroy any significant
}
architectural or historical feature of the designatL* historic
landmark or is Inappropriate or inconsistent with the spirit
and purposes of this article, it shall notify the applicant
within thirty days of receipt of said application that the
application has been disapproved and shall include !n such
notification the changes necessary to secure approval of the
application,
(4) If no action has been taken by the landmark
Commission within sixty days of the receipt of the application,
a certificate of appropriateness shall be deemed Issued by the
landmark commission.
PAGE 10
5
d
Tf¢
9
a
solo=
(S) No change shall be made in the application for {
Issuance of a certificate of appropriateness without
resubmittal to the landmark commission and approval thereof in
the same manner as provided above.
(G) After a decision is reached by the landmark
commission denying cn application for certificate of
appropriateness, a resubmittal of application will not be
accepted for additional bearing within a twelve month period
from the date of final decision except upon written request by {
the applicant indicating that there has been a change in
conditions or that all changes in the application as
recommended by the landmark commission have been made,
(c) Ordinary repair or maintenance:
ys Ordinary repair or maintenance which does not involve
changes in architectural and historic value, style c: general
design is exempt from the provisions of this section.
(d) Appeal.
Any applicant or interested person aggrieved by a
ruling of the landmark commission under the provisions of this
section may, within thirty days after the date of such ruling,
! appeal to the city council.
Section 28A•10. HISTORIC LANDWX S•DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL.
i
(a) If an application is received for demoittlon or
removal of a designated historic landmark, the building
official shall immediately forward the application to the
landmark commission. The landmark commission shall hold a
public hearing on the application within thirty days after the
application is initially filed with the building official. The
applicant shall be given ten days written notice of the
hearing. The landmark commission shall consider the state of
repair of the building, the reasonableness of the cost of
restoration or repair, tb% existing and/or potential
usefulness, including economic usefulness of the building, the
purposes behind preserving the structure as a historic
PACE 11
h x.. ix 1
z
landmark, the character of the nelghboriiooe, and all other
factors It finds appropriate. If the Iandmar}'. Commission
determines thet in tht interest of preserving historical
values, the structure should not be demolished or removed, it
! shall notify the building official that the application has
been disapproved, .nd the building officW shall so advise the
applicant within five days therefrom. If the ian!rark commis-
sion determines that the interest of preserving historical
values will not be adversely affected by such demolishment or
removal or that the interest of preserving historical values
can best be served by the removal of a structure to another
specified location, it shall issue its certificate of
demniitlon or its certificate of removal, as may be appro-
priate, to the building official; and the building official
shall so advise the applicant within five days therefrom. I
{
(b) If no actloo has been taken by the landmark commission
within sixty days of original receipt by the landmark commis-
sion of the application, a certificate of demolition or s
certificate of removal shall be deemed issued by the landmark
commission and the building official shall to advise the
applicant.
(c) After a decision is reached by the landmark commission
denying an application for a certificate of demolition cr a
certificate of removal, a resubmittal of application for such a
certificate will not be accepted for additional hearing within
a twelve-month period from the date of final decision.
(d) Any applicant or the owner of any property located
within three hundred feet of any landmark who is aggrieved by a
ruling of the landmark commission concerning some landmark
under the provision of this section may, within sixty days
after the ruling of the landmart commission, appeal to the city
council. Following a public hearing to be held within thirty
days of the filing of a notice of such appeal %ith the city
secretary, the city council may, by a simple msaority vote,
FACE 12
p iv
rM
F
ry
uphold or overturn any ruling e: the landmark commission m,de
pursuant to this section,
Section 29A•11. PROCEDURE FOR OBTAIPING DUILDING I'M41T
REMOVAL PERMIT, DEM)LITION PERMIT AND FOR
ALTERING THE ERTEPIOR OF ,4 BUILDING OR
STRUCTURE DURING PENDENCY OF CONSIDERATION
OF SUCH BUILDING OR STRUCTURE AS A HISTORIC
LANDAI K OR AS PART OF A HISTORIC L&ND?I X.
(a) From and after the date on which the question of
whether or not any building, structure, or site within the City
should be designated as a historic landmark is placed upon the
agenda for any spatial or regular meeting of the landmark
commission, or from and after the date on which such agenda is
i
pasteC in accordance with the provision of Article 6252.17,
V.A.T,C.S., as amended, or from and after the date that the
landmui :o iaion approves or recommends a preservation plan
or any amendment of any existing preservation plan which
embraces or includes the building, structure, or site within
the City, whichever date first occurs, no building permit
ellowiag the construction, reconstruction, alteration, change,
restcration, removal or demolition of any exterior
architectural feature of any building or structure than
existing including or embraced in whole or in part within the
scope of such agenda consideration or such treservatlon plan or
Ach amendment thereof, as the use may be and no permit
allowing the demolition or removal of ■ll or any oast of any
I such building or structure may be issued by any official of the
city, nor if no such permit is required, may any person or
entity construct, reconstruct, alter, change, restore, remove
or demolish any exterior architectural feature of any such
building or structure, until the earliest of the following
conditions have been tot:
I
(1) A tinal and binding certificate of app:opriete-
ness, removal or demolition, as may be appropriate, has been
issued by the landmark commission;
(2) The landmark commission falls to rake a recommen-
dation that some part or all of am• such building or structure
PAGE 13
f
i`
I
i
I
be designated a historic Iandmerk or be 3neluded within e
historic landmark or within a preservation plan or an amendment
thereof within sixty days following the earliest of the above
described dates activating this section application under the
circumstances; or,
(3) A final and binding decision has been made b;• the
city CCU-Icil that no ;)art of any such building or structure
shall be designated a historic landmark or shall be Included
within any designated historic .Landmark. Provided, however,
that should the city council fail to ■ct within ninety days
from the date in appeal is filed, the requested permit *hill be
granted, The ninety day time limitation may be waived by the
appellant to allow the city council an atlltionaI thlity days
In which to act,
(b) It shall be the duty of the landmark commission to
furnish the building official with a copy or written notice of
each such written order or such Agenda or such preservation
plan or amendment thereof, is the case me), be, as promptly
after the preparation thereof as Is irsetieable, the failure
to so furnish the building official with a copy or written
notice thereof, however, shall not have the effect of
validating any building permit, removal permit or demolition '
permit Issued In ignorance of any such written order or
agenda- In any instance in which any such permit me
required, It shall be may not
the duty of the Sendma:k commission to
to '
give notice of any such written order or such agends or sic'. 1
preservation plan or amendment thereof in the owner or owners
of any building or structure included within the scope thereof,
which notice shell be deemed complete when actually given,
orally or in writing, to such owner or owners, or when written
notice thereof is deposited in the United States mail, postage
prepaid, certified or registered, with return receipt
requested, addressed to such owner or owners, whichever event
i
first occurs.
I
PAGE 11
I
(tl Any permit Issued to any person or entity from or
after the date of any
such written order, or such agenda, or
the approval or recommendatior of such preservation plan or
amendment thereof, es the case may be, shall be null, void and
of no force or effect until the earliest of the events
described in subparagraphs (i), fl) and (3) of subsection (11
next above to oceur.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter,
no building permit, removal permit or demolition permit shalt
be issued by the building inspector for any structure located
In a National Register District except as authorized by the
subsection, The building lnspectnr shall notify the landmark
commission immediately of any application r:questing a building
permit, removal permit or demolition Permit for it structure
located in a National Register Distric•.. No such permit shell
be issued by the building inspector before the landmark
commission has made a recommendation or scheduled the structure
on its agenda or before the expiration of forty (40) calendar
days, whichever is sooner, If a structure is made an agenda
item, it shall be scheduled for a public hearing as soon as
adjacent property owners ate notified. for purposes of this
i
subsection, "Nations) Register District', is defined as a
a_e;ignated area possessing a significant concentration, linkage '
or continuity of sites, building structures or objects which
are separated geographically but are linked by association or
history; provided, that no arcs may be considered a National
Register District for purposes of this subsection unless it has
been designated In the Federal Register
pursuant to the
National Preservation Act of 1066, as amended, prior to the
effective date of this amendment, and until maps depicting such
area are made available for inspection by the public in the
office of the Building Inspection Department. Notwithstanding
any, provision hereof, this sectic- shall riot apply to
geographical areas designated as historic districts under the
provisions of this ordinance,
PAGE 13
Section 26A•12. S4~ji:.OiISSI01' Oi 1'ECESSARI' REPAIRS.
(a) The exterior of a designated historic landmark shell
be maintained to insure the structural soundness of such
landmark.
If the landmark ee ommiveasthlaon a
etha tted th hier se are
reasonab2t grounds to bel i
tfinddssi gna
toric
landmark !s structurally unIcund or In imminent danger of
becoming structurally unsound, the landmark commission shell
notify in writing the owner of record of the designated
historic landmark of such fact.
(c) Upon the giving of ten days written notice to the
owner of record of such designated historic landmark, the
landmark commission shall hold a public hearing to determine If
the designated historical building is structurally unsound or
In imminent danger of becoming structurally unsound. The
landmark Commission's report may include evidence of economic
hardship or willful neglect.
(d) At the conclusion of the hearing, it the landmark
commission finds that the designated historic building is
i structurally unsound or in danger of becoming structurally
unsound and that no valid reason exists ss to why the Owner
cannot or should not undertake to safeguard the structural
soundness of the building, It shall in writing notify the '
record owner of the finding.
(e) The owner of record of o designated historic landmark
who has been notified by the landmark commission that such
landmark is structurally unsound or in danger of so becoming
shall within ninety days of receipt of such notice, satisfy the
historic landmark commission that ressonally necessary repairs
to safeguard the structural soundness of the landmark have been
effected.
I
(f) If s landmark commission determines that the
building Is structurally ursound but there are valid reasons
why the owner cannot or should not undertake to safeguard the
structural soundness of the building, it shall forward to the I
PAGE 16
1
it
City council its recommendation as to what action, if any,
should be taken on the structure.
(B) Any applicant or interested person aggrieved by a
ruling of the landmark commission under the provisions of tF.s
section may, within thirty days after the date of such ruling,
appeal to the city council,
Section 2BA•17. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION TO
COEXIST k1TH OTHER USE CLASSIFICATIONS
Use classifications as to all property Vhich may be
included In a historic landmark designation shall continue to
be governed by the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the city
and the procedures therein established.
Section 28A•11. HISTORIC DISTRICTS DEFINED; RESTRICTIONS
BOW DIPOSI HE ES ABLISHED; REQU DISTRI FOR
APPLICATIONS FOR DISTRICTS SET FORTH;
DISTAICT PRESERVATIONEVA.LUATING
PLANSSAME
DEFINED: NIS:
CELLfNEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIRENExIl OF
F RD MODIFICA 1IONI OF SORDINANCE; PROVISIONS
ESTABLISHED.
(a) DEFINITION. Districts which may be designated
r,
Historic Landmarks pursuant to Section 2BA•1 shall herelr be
referred to to "HISTORIC DISTRICTS" and
shall mean
geographleally definable areas; possessing significant
coneentratioat, links "
Be, or continuity of buildings, structures,
sites, areas or land which are united by architectural, his-
torical, archseioglbal, or cultural Importance or significance.
(b) RESTRICTIONS. All buildings, structures, sites, areas
or lands located with a designated historic district, whether
individually designated historic or not, are subject to these
regulations, No person or entity shall construct, reconstruct, '
alter, change, restore, remove or demoli,~h In any way the
exterior features of such building, structure, or site, area or
land until a permit has b-an granted by the building official
of the City of Denton. Furthermore, no public improvements,
Including, bit not limited to, street construction, signs,
lighting, sidewalk construction, parking facllltles and traffic
PAGE 17
1 i
~ I
aaem~ . ~ . ~ .
J
I
system changes, except trsffi_ control signs and devices, shall
be made within or affecting a historic district without
approval of the city council after recommendation has been
suhmitted by the landmark commi9aivn and appropriate cIt>-
departments.
(c) DISTRICT BOUNDARIES. The boundaries of historic
districts shall be drawn to as to include all buildings,
structures, sites, areas or lands which meet one or more of the
criteria set out in Section 2BA•3 herein or which directly
affect or relate to such buildings, structures, sites, arise or
lands meeting on one more of the Section 2BA-3 criteria, j
provided that at least Sit of the total structures within the
boundaries are of architectural, historic, archaeological, or
cultural importance or value.
(d) ESTABLISHMENT OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
(1) Applications for considerstion of s historic
district shall be based upon architectural, historical,
archaeological or cultural importance or value and accompanied
by a report to the landmark commission Containing the following
information.
(a) A list of specific buildings, structures, sites,
areas or Lands of lmportance or value located wiryih the
proposed district boundaries and a description of the
particular importance or value of e%eh such building,
structure, site, area or land.
(b) A map showing the bound,Arles of the proposed
historical district drawn to a scale of 11'x2001; and the
location of each structure of importance or value identifled by
a number or letter desig,.ation.
(C) Sufficient photographs oe each building,
structure, site, area or Isnd of importance or value showing
the condition, color, site and architectural detail of each,
and,
FADE is
i
$)-Stec changes, except traffic control signr and devices, shall
be nade within or affecting a historic district without
approval of the ci ty council after recommendation has been
- submitted by the landmark commission and appropriate city
departments,
Cc) DI STAICT BOUNDARIES. The boundaries of historic
districts shall he drawn to as to include all buildings,
structures, sites, areas or lands which meet one or more of the
criteria set out in Section 2SA•3 herein or which directly
effect or relate to such buildings, structures, sites, area or
lands meeting on one more of the Section 28A•3 criteria,
provided that at least 511 of the total structures within the
boundaries are of architectural, historic, archaeological, or
cultural importance or value.
(d) ESTABLISHMENT OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
(1) Applications for consideration of a historic
j district shall be based upon architectural, historical,
archaeological or cultural importance or value and accompanied
by a report to the landmark commission containing the following
information, „ j
(a) A list of specific buildings, structural, sites,
areas or lends of importance or value located within the III
proposed district boundaries and a description of the f
particular importance or value of each such building, III
structure, site, area or land,
(b) A map showing the boundaries of the proposed 1
historical district drawn to a Scale of 1'le'00'; and the
location of each structure of importance or value identified by
a number or letter designation.
(c) Sufficient photographs of each building,
structure, site, area or land of importance or value showing
the condition, color, Site and architectural detail of each;
and,
FACE Ie
k
(d) A description of each building, structure, site,
area or land of Importance or value mowing the condition,
color, sire and architectural detail of each; and where possible
1. date of construction
2. builder or architect
3. chain of uses and ownership
4. architectural style
S. materials
6. construction technique
1, reco ninon by State or National Government as
architecturally or historically significant, if so
designated.
(2) Application for establishment of an historic district
on the basis of cultural or archaeological importance or value
shall be accompanied by a report containing the following
Information.,
(a) A map showing the boundaries of the proposed
district drawn to a scale of 1114001;
(b) A description of the cultural or archaeological
importance or value of the building, structure, site, area or
land being proposed for historic designatior; end
(o) Any evidence which would shjw recognition by
either the State of Texas and/or the National G^vernment.
(3) Applications to increase the boundaries of an historic
district may be made if one or more of the following conditions
are tit:
(a) when buildings, structures, sites, areas or lands
of importance or value are related to the district are requeste3
for inclusion.
(b) when facts previously undisclosed to or unknown by
the landmark commission are revealed which indies!# that a
particular building or site Is possessed of special
architectural, archaeological, cultural or historical importance
or value,
PAGE 19
T _ - - ~ -r- - -T
..roes
(4) Applications to reduce the boundaries of an historic
district may be made when one or more of the following
conditions have been met;
(a) When it car be shown that a particular building,
structure, site, area or land has no historic, architectural,
archaeological or cultural Importance or value to the viability
of the district.
(b) When exclusion of buildings, structures, sites,
areas or lands is necessary' for major new development that would
support either the architectural, historical, archaeological, or
cultural character or economic viability of the district,
(c) Whin it can be shown that no degradation of the
district either physical, h!storical, architectural, archae-
ological, or cultural will result from e..clusion of property
from the district.
(S) Application for inclusion or exclusion may be made when
either continued exclusion or inclusion of property within the
i
district would render it an economical hordhalp for reason- able
t
continuation in its present exterior form, In order to
establish such economic hardship, the owner must show that no
reasonable sltentativa uss exists which allows the exterior of
the building to remain in its original style, In evaluating
economic return, the Commission may request the owner to
document the value, rents, returns, tax burden, and/or
contracts, pertaining to the property,
1
(a) CRITERIA FOP DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
In evaluating applicitions for historic districts, the
I
landmark commission shalt consider Sections 20A•3 and Section
26A•13(d). If the landmark commission recommends the
establishment of an historic district or districts, it shall
cause to be prepared an historic district designation ordinance
which shall contain, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) A statement of purpose setting forth the
commission's reasons for recommending designation of the
district; and
PAGE 2D i
{
I
t
Y
+r
(2) A legal description of the boundaries of the
district;
(3) Maps, charts and photographs of the buildings,
structures, sites, areas, or lands located vithin the district;
ICJ-~ (4) Findings that support the criteria required in
Section 28A-3 and 28A-13, if applicable, that establishes the
particular importance or value of the district.
(S) Recommendations for the protection and preser-
vation of the district referred to herein as district
preservation plan.
(f) DISTRICT PRESERVATION PLAN.
The district preservation pisn shall include, but shall
not be limited to the following:
(1) 7oning Classification of Uses. The commission may
examine the uses existing within the district in terms of their
individual and continued effect upon the character, safety,
economic end physical impact of the district and may recommend
such changes in toning, height and area regulations.
(2) Building Code Requirements. The commission may
review and recommend any amendments to the building regulations
it feels necessary to preserve the architectural and historic
Integrity and authenticity of structures within each such
district,
(S) Sign Regulations. The Commission may review the
provisions of the sign regulations that are permissible within
each such district and recommend such alterations in site,
location, type and construction they feel appropriate. In
preparing such reenmmendations, the Commission shell consider
existing signs as well as criteria for future signs, In the
event that an existing sign or signs are deemed to have s
negative impact on the character of the district, the Commission
may recommend a method of removal or improvement of %uch sign or
signs, reviewing suvA sigrt changes with owners or tenants prior
to such recommendation.
PAGE 21
I
NUMS
(4) Par};lns Regulations, The commis +S on may renew
the parking regulations in existence In
the district and
recommend any changes in numbers, or location of on•street and
off-street parking requirements it feels necessary to enhance
the district. It shall review the adequacy of parking
facilities in or affecting the district and may offer recom•
mendati°ns for such public and/or private parking lots, garages
or structures it deems to be In the best overall Interest of the
district.
(S) Architectural Regulations. As a guide for those
seeking a cfrtifl a to of ►pproprlatenels pursuant to Section
r 28A•8. the historic landmark commission may, in conformance with
the applicable zoning classification, height limitation, and in keeping with the significant archiand tectural'
historical, archaeological or cultural elements of each such
district recommend regulations affecting the exterior of the
building, including, but not limited to, the following;
(a) Acceptable materiels for new construction such as
stucco, masonry, metal and glass curtain;
(b) Appropriate architectural character, local 0 and
det+ll for new construction;
(c) Acceptable appurtenances to new and existing
structures such As gables, parapets, balconies and dormers;
(d) Acceptable ttetures and ornamentation such as
paint colors and types, list o: wood, stone, metal, plaster,
,
Plastics and other man-made materiels, use of shutters, wrought
and cast iron, finishes of meta], colors of glass, such as
silver, gold, bronze, smoke, and other details or architectural
ornamentation.
(e) Acceptable accessories
h on new or existing
structures such as light fixtures
, g++ lights, a n°pies,
exterior errpentrY, tilt or wood, banners, flips and
projections; and
PAGE 22
t
ff) For those properties which are sites, areas,
lands, buildipgs, structures, or vacant lots which are not of
historical, atchitecturel, archaeologtcai or cultural importance
or value, development or redevelopment may be at the ovner's
discretion as long as there is no variance from the historic
district preservation plan to materials, scale and detail,
appurtenances, textures, ornamentation and accessories, anu the
owner complies with existing regulations. In these instances,
no review by the landmark commission would be required, and no
certificate of appropriateness would apply,
(6) Transit and Traffic Operations, The commission
stay review the transit and traffic operations in and through the
district and provide recommendations to the urban transportation
department and city council on routes, schedules, one-way and J
two-way serest patterns, park and rise, shuttle services and +JJ
pedestrian facilities that will enhance and preserve the 1
character of the district.
(7) Public Improvements. The landmark commission may i
i
recommend to the city council acceptable public architectural
and en;ineerina designs Including street lighting, street
furniture, signs, lands.:rpll•ngf utility facilites such as
electric poles and wires, telephone lines; design textures of
sidewaiks and streets, such as brick, stone and tile, and such
other elements as deemed necessary for enhancement and
preservation of the district,
(g) Administrative Aequirements of Landmark Commission.
(l) when a historic landmark commission considers an
area as a possible historic district, it shall, prior to
readarinr its final recommendation and report, submit its
report, including the district preservation plan or any proposed
ordinance amendments to all city departments, boards and
commissions and other public agencies directly affected.
(2) In addition, it shall, and prior to rendering its
final recommendation, make the plan available to the landowners
in the proposed district. In the event the area under
PAGE 23
I
I
consideration has established an historic district committee,
the commission may include the comments of Stich committee in its
final report. If appropriate and desired, the commission should
recommend that the cit) council adopt the restrictions to assure
that future public investment complies with the term c, the
district.
(3) Commission approved medallions for designsted
structures within the district shall be prepared and, subject to
the approve] of the owners, ray be affixed to the I'M" &-isignated
structures.
(h) Changes in Provisions herein. Such regu'.ations,
restrictions, and boundaries may from time to time ba amende.,
Supplemented, changed, modified, or repealed, In ease, however,
of a written protest against such change, signed by the owners Ill
of twenty percent or more either of is area cf the lots or ]and i
f
included in such proposed change, or of the loto or land
immediately adjoining the same and extending 200 feet therefrom,
such amendment shall not become effective except by th
favorable vote of three-fourths of all, members of the city
council
Section 2SA•13, PENALTY
(a) It shall be unlawful to construct, reconstruct,
structurally alter, remodel, renovate, restore, demolish, rate,
of maintain any building, structure, or land in a historic
landmark designation In violation of the provisions of this
ordinance, and the city in addition to other remedies, may
institute any appropriate action or proceedings to prevent such
unlawful construction, re at oratIor,, demolition, rating, or
maintenance, to restrain, correct, or abate such violation, to
prevent any illegal set, business, or maintenance in and abnut
such premises.
(b) Any person, firm, or corporation violating any
provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each day or
PAGE 24
s
I~
portion thereof during which any violation hereof is committed,
:ontinues or is permitted, and upon conviction of any such
violation shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed two
hundred dollars.
Suction 26A-16. NOTICE,
Any notira required to be given under this title, if not
actually delivered, shall be given by deposit.-.g the some in the
a United States mall, postage prepaid, addressed to the person or
entity to whom such notice is to be given at his last known
li address. When notice is required to be given to an owner or
ewne•s of property, such notice, delivered or mailed by
i i
s certified or registered mail, may be addressed to such owner or
owners who have rendered their said property for city taxes so
the ownership appears on the last approved city tax roll.
SECTION II.
i This ordinance shall become effective from and after its
date of pacsage and publication as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
4
CITY OF DANTON, TEXAS
i
ATTEST:
-Sim
CITY OF DENfON, TEXAS
i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR JR., CITY
t ATTORNEI, CI~'Y OF DENTON, TEXAS
t
PY.
h
PAGE 2d
f
0
I
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
f
DATE OF MEETING:April 1, 1980 i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE E)LkCT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO HE PLACED ON AGENDA)t 1
Consider a resolution authorizing the signatures and the signing of the escrow
agreement with the State for the widening of Loop 288.
SUMMARYs
State has retained escrow agreement for apprt,kimately 5409,000. Council needs
to pass resolution authorizing sig,,atures fe4r the escrow agreement and sign
the escrow agreement. They should also take related action to agree on amount
the City should fund and instruct staff to return the escrow agreement to the
Highway Department aflar the contract and checks have been received from Melvin
Simon,
FISCAL SLXMARYt
Cost to the City will be $300,000 less the j~ssessment if the Council wishes to
pursue this in the future. The assessment would net the city approximately
$30,000, Bill M Lary from Finance will add the funding sources.
I
ACTION REQUIREDt
Council should rear' resolution and sign the escrow agreeme±t and instruct
staff tc steps they should take to obtain an agreement and funding from
Melvin Simon,
I
ALTERNATIVESt
Not to sign resolution and escrow agreemen, and not widen 288 at this time.
STAFF RECOKSENDATIONSI
Staff recommends approval of resolution and signing of the escrow agreement
EXHIBITSt
1. Memo to G.C. Hartung
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Ilartung
FROM: R. Svehla
DATE: March 27, 1980
r
RE: Escrow Agreement with the Highway Department for widening of 288
a resolution authorizing signing of this agreement and recomirenda-
tions on steps needed to insure the City has a limit of $300,000
liability.
I, We have finally received the escrow agreement from the Dallas Office of
Highway Department. 'rho amount of money needed to be put up for widening
of 288 will be approximately $409,(00. In order to meet State requirements,
i all present Council members will be required to sign the escrow agreement.
The Highway Department will also require the Council to pass a resolution
authorizing all members of the Council to sign the c3crow agreera0nt. The
attorney has d,,awn the resolution and it is included in the packet.
' In September of last year, Melvin Simon and Associates (the Mall owners)
made a presentation to the Council asking for the Council's help in
widening 288 fran the MKT tracks to I-35E. At that time, Melvin Simon
proposed to fund anything over $300,000 plus all the engineering costs
of retaining Carter and Burgess to do the engineering design. We have
had phone conversations with representatives from Melvin Simon today and
thoy have assured us they still intend to fund anything over $30D,000.
1h.-Ir attorneys are drawing up a contract indicating this and we hope to
have copies a^ailable for Council review by Monday.
;i Finally, at the Septom',er meeting, the Council also decided to take the
staffs recommendation to assess the frontage on each side of 288 at $15.00
per front foot. Staff still recommends this proposal and If the Council
still wants us to do this, we suggest that the Council follow this procedure:
1) They pass the resolution authorizing the signing of the escrow
'i agreement and sign the escrow agreement.
2) Instruct staff to hold escrow agreement until a check and an
agreement from Melvin Simon is received for any expense over
$300,000.
3) Once the escrow agreement and related contract and checks have
been cnmpleted, Council adopt an assessment ordinance assessing
III'` per front foot.
both sides of 288 at $15.00
s,
r
e
1
N
i
atv'-x ~
. kw 0.,t
Mullo to G.C. Hartung
Escrow Agreement of Mall
Page 2
I
I
Staff will be available for any questions that you and the Council might
have.
d °
aisve
I
Director of Public Works
I
i
I ,
r
k
Y
F
tN ,
J
r
.
R E S O L U T I O N
WIIEkEAS, the City of Denton desires to widen Loop 288 from
the MKT Railroad tracks to U.S. Interstate 3S; and
WHEREAS, the State of Texas has agreed to participate with
the City of Denton on this project; and
WHEREAS, the State of Texas requires that all council-
persons of the City of Denton execute an escrow agreement with
the State for its participation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE .I1' RESOLVED BY TEIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DhNTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
It is the intent of the City Council of the City of Denton,
i
Texas to participate with the State of Texas in widening Loop
288 from the MKT Railroad tracks to U. S. Interstate 35, and
all councilpersons are hereby authorized to execute the
h
necessary Escrow Agreement reyuirt,4 by the State of Texas to
achieve this purpose.
e
i SECTION II.
That this resolution shall take affect immediately from and
after its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the r_ day of
lean.
CITY OF DLNTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
~ii~6~"fi"of.7; Z`T`rY"gTCtiF7'ATiY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LrGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTOitNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (a, 7)566.8200 ~
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
a
FROM: W. H. McNary, Director of Finance
I
DATE: March 27, 1980
It
SUBJECT: THE FINANCING FOR THE WIDENING OF LOOP 288
Because of the urgency of widening Loop 288 and the current
uncertainties of the municipal bond market, the most appropriate
method of funding this project is through internal financing.
Included on the agenda for April 1 is a resolution which provides
for the transfer of funds from the Electric System Fund to the
Street Improvement Flood in the amount of $300,000.
These funds represent excess cash generated from the refunding of
Electri, System Uonds in 1978. There is no programmed requirement
for these funds within the next 5 years. This resolution provides
for repayment of the cash auvance through general revenues and at an
interest rate of 10%, Repayment of this loan is feasible because of
the increase in sales tax revenue generated by the Mall.
W. H. McNary 5~~
i Director of Finance
s pi
i
i
i
{
M I ip
R E_S 0_L U T 10,N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The project entitled "Widening Loop 288" is hereby
approved for 0e Street Improvement Fund,
p
SECTION II.
The City Manager 1s authorized to transfer the sum of
$300,000 from the Electric System Fund to the Street
P
Improvement Fund as a cash advance to be repaid from General
Revenues over a five (5) year period at an interest rate of ten
percent (10%),
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1980.
CITY OF DENMI, TEXAS
i
ATTEST:
tl~-tlo~rxa~~r; ~~~r-sE~k€l~av
CrTY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
APPROVED AS 'rO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS
:t BY:
t
r
1
I
i
I
DENTON GIRL'S SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION
r THE STATE OF TEXAS $
COUNTY OF DEiJTON S CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
I
This Agreement made this the let day of April, 1980, by and
between the Denton Girl's Softball Association, hereinafter
~II referred to as the "Association', and the City of Denton, hate-
1 inefter referred to as "City", each acting by and through its
authorized officials, pursuant to the following terms and
conditions$
City Agrees to deposit with the association the sum of Four
Thousand One Handfed and No/100 ($4,100,00) Dollars and Certain
fees and charges heroinafter described, for the Cit/'s fiscal
year 1980. Association shall submit an annual budget to the
Denton Parks and Recreation Department for approval which shall
sot forth on an Item by item basis the fees and charges Lerein-
after described, and the above Four Thousand One Hundred and
f Vo/100 ($10100.10) Dollars, the City will make one payment to
li the Association on the Ist day of April 1980, in the amount
projected in the annual budget. City shall make such payments
r I
solely from current revenues in the budget of the parks and
,
t Recreation Department, Expendituroe shell be authorised for e
period from April 1, 1980 through August 31, 1980,
1t.
Associat?on ogroes to provide quai(fied umpires for all
{ Girl's Youth League Softball games and spicial games that are
j sponsored b; the Denton Girl's Softball Association.
) IIt,
Association alrees to the following additional teems and
conditional
i 1. It will sstabltsh a separate bank account for deposit
of the four Thousand One llundred and 21o/1n0 ($4,100.00) Doilats
paid to the Assoclation by the City and all expenditures for
6ervices providel shall be made fro,n this account.
{
HVh.lt~
r.
1
i
2. It will establish, operate, and maintain an account
system for this program that will allow for a tracing of funds
and a review of the financial status of the program.
I. It will permit authorised officials for the City of
DOn[On to review its books at any time.
4. It will reduce to writing all of its rules, regula-
tions, and policies and file a copy with the Director of Parks
and Recreation or his authorised representative along with any
amendments, additions, or revisions whenever, adopted.
5. it will not enter into any contracts that would
i
encumber the City funds for a period that would extend beyond
the term of this Agreement.
6. it will prepare and submit a report of expenditures and
i
revenues to the Director of Packs and Recreation or his tepre-
eentstive by the lat day of Septombor, 1460.
i. It will refund the balance of the special account -to
the City of Denton on or before September 11 1980.
8. It will promptly pay all bills when submlttedi unless
therd is a discrepancy in a bill which should be promptly
j reported to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his enth-
orlsed representative for further direction,
9. It will appoint a representative who will be available
to meet with the Director of Parks and Recreation and other
City officials when requested.
10. It will indemnify and hold harmless the City from any
i and all claims nd suits arising out of the activities of the
Association, its employeea, indloc contractors.
11. It will obtain releases from the officials which will
a roleass, Indemnify and hold harmless the City and the Asso-
elation from any claims, injuries, or damages of the officials.
i lt. It will retain officials as Independent contractors and
not as employees.
The gen4ral terms and Con:itions are as followsi
1. it any of the terms and conditions are not coim711Pd
i
with by the Association, the City is authorized to refuse to
E make any further payments until the condition on which the
complaint is based is corrected to the natisfartion of the City.
+ 2. This contract shall be object to all va'.id rules,
i regulations, and laws applicable thereto as promulgated by the
United States of America, State of Texas, or any other govern-
mental body or agency having lawful jurisdiction.
r
3. Association is authorised and should give notices
required herein to the Director of Parks and Recreation or that
person's authorised representative.
! 1, Any contributions or giCta received by the Association
are not subject to the provisions of this contract and they,.
b should be kept cepatate and spar: from the funds, Cherges, and
fees covered by this contract.
5. Association shall provide its services and be paid by
the City in the capacity of an independent contractor and rot
{ as an agent or department of the City. It shall have complete
f
control, supervision, and responsibility for its activities
j under thin Contract including the hiring, supervision, and
j aontroi of its employees.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the part'es hereto, acting under
1
authority of their governing body and Board of Directorsi have
I
caused this contract to be duly executed in two aoantarparta,
,
each of which will constitute An original, as of the let day of
April, 1980.
t
,
JILL NASH, I Y R
CITY OF DEMON, :'ERAS
ATTEM DENTON CIRL'S SOFTBALL
ASSOCIATION
BR OK CITY SECRCTARI BY,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS brlD I{ II N, PRESIDENT
i
AMOVED AS TO LUOAL FORM-.
C. J. TAILOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
SYS
r
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 1, 1980
A enJa Item:
Consider the final plat of Skyline Addition.
Summa.
The petitioner, Mr. R. B. Meltun, Jr. seeks to subdivide a 777 acre parcel,
which begins at the southeast corner of Lindsey and KEndolph Streets,into three
(3) lots for residential use. The lot being platted at the corner of Lindsey and
Kendolph is 60.3 feet X 140 feet and establishes a 70 foot building line along
Lindsey Street.
Article 13 of the Comprehensive zonirl ordinance specifies "on a corner lot used
for one-family or two-family dwellings, both street exposures shall be treated as
front yards on all lots platted after the effective date of this ordinar^e,
except that where one street exposure is designated as a side yard by a juilding
line shown on a plat approved by the City Planning and Zoning Commission containing
a side yard of ten (10) feet or more the building provisions on the plat shall be
observed,"
The ?lanning and Zoning Commission considered the final plat of Skylin+ Addition
at their meeting of February 20, 1980 and recommended denial of the plat. Upon
request of the petitioner the plat was placed on the Planning and Zoning Comnp!asion
Agenda of March 5, 1980 and was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission,
however the Commission was unaware of neighborhood apposition to the plat, moreover
the apponenets were unaware of their right to oppose the plat at the Planning
Commission meeting of March 5, 1980. For the purpose of affording the opponents
an opportunity to comment on this plat, this item was placed on the Planning
Commission Agenda once more and at their meeting of March 19, 1960 the Planning
Commission unanimously denied the final plat of Skyline Addition.
Concurrent with the Planning and Zoning Commission consideration of the plat, Mr.
Melton petitioned the Board of Adjustment to grant a 5 foot variance of the 10
foot building tine being established by the plat After mailing the public notice
to property owners within 200 feet concerning the 5 foot variance before the
Board of Adjustment a number of letters were returned to the Planning and Community
Development Department and were filed in the Board of Adjustment case file, but
the letters were in opposition to both the Board of Adjustment variance request
and the final plat of Skyline Addition. (The Board of Adjustment denied the 5 foot
variance request at their meeting of March 10, 1980.)
Recommenr~a tion:
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the final
plat of Skyline Addition.
Alternatives:
The City Council can either approve or deny the olat.
T
r
Skyline Addition
Page Two
Action Required:
The City Council can either approve or deny the plat.
Exhibits:
A. Memo
8. Map
C. Petition, letters, and reply forms f'✓
1
6
x ~
1 I`
i
x
i
i
F
r
i
- ~T 77-
T-
Awn-
SMALL .nee I
i
I
' rCi V'r V../
TRACTS
t~
I
i
LINDSEY
M Wgo, tr t IILi1'
LOT 2 ¢I
I airusrw o Lot
I MAW e
p, A I LOT b u
.
.J I
BLOCK I g
Y i.o,oe' sL s'
49
w s ~sN~r s~~ ~ tes is'
I
i !G 4 e
We the undersigned oppose the replatting proposed by-k.
B. Melton, Jr,, of the lot on the southeast corner of the
intersection of Lindsey and Kendolph. Because of the ele-
vation of the lot, a turn soutb from Lindsey to Kendolph I
I
is practically a blind turn. The additional visual obstruc-
tion resulting from a house being built only 20 feet from
Lindsey would make this turn quite dangerous.
In addition, Mr. Nelton has openly stated that the replatting
of this corner lot is the first step in an attempt to obtain
replatting of the large lot (approximately 460 feet of
frontage on Kendolph) immediately south of the corner lot.
j Mr, Melton has stated that he plans to request a replatting
of this property into 6 lots with 60 foot fronts and one lot
with 100 foot frontage. There are currently no lots on
Kendolph between 135 and Willowwood with 60 foot fronts.
Mr, Melton has further stated that he intends to build homes
on these lots and to keep the ownership of these homes in
the Melton family, That is, Mr. Melton intends to ultimately
seek the replatting of a piece of property 610 ' by 225
for the purpose of building rent houses. We feel that thee
intrusion of such a large contigu,%us block of rent property
is damaging to the integrity of the neighborhood and clearly
violates the spirit of the current single family zoning,
J '
Name / address Date
/(f4 ~J /~c~1(IGL1 Z~ /J~/U /i~/ i ll 7A%1)4
. ~ ' i , 7 ~ ~ 1 R..7~ ~ i~ ,f~t~: ~ n, a-~ri-- ,
t e.1,
JV4
15oV 1eC--,v&6p,4 3`74'0
J~ ,~j' ~ Z Gd ~ ~ 31J7 ~
I
el /kip,
nv~l
Is ;fr4e 3 i~O
w,.
f >
r'
Addecss . A e;
1 l v~ / f
/Y,o
.
11
~ ~1 f
Name
address
Date
C f
IVAO
' O
J li''.' 'tc rt
, 7 ~f~a
AAA tl~.
y;,y,.. [-I{~ CL~.~tIJ~(, p ' /yam •
w.~G✓ S= .>L wt" SfLIB..
!1``• ~11~t Y,I'S~.~t ~r s'L/b~/1l~~stf.+.~• + ~jl.. 'IVL(i ..Y wJ/~~ti ,~~V ' I~
~'Y :~.,e~ ~j'.. 4✓V' Ill 1~/7. E~.. ~ ~7•^. tt. 1 './L//•~ . .P D~/j7,.
31
Y " f V a~z& 144 3 LV WIPPcr t w t r, ; ~+€yh e%~. $
198
19' ?0
a Vv
-elk
Mot 1Y1a4 ~s
SD
►el-* Ise d ~E Rd, 71~-•t.i.,t~ t q kf~
1
Teo
Iv 0 41.
ti'k~ rn,d
uµ •
4
~i
lei
j" 9VII0
gj
J i82~ rd~u,~rG y~reray q, iy~d.
I ✓~'y,.. °~L ~'•-Lt,. t Y ~ 3 r'i1~r,1~~c , 19 S'J
5 10
47, e I goo
, a
v .
R
k
.
;s-
.inv.
Address Date
lge>
-31 (CPO
~ ~ 1' V VWL l1'ri
44.
7 v d '
f, • 1 V/M
;
rp~
I N-t
,,y
March 9, 1980
To, Planning and Zoning Commission, Denton, Texas
On Wednesday, March 5, 1980, the P. and Z. met for the second time
to consider a request by R. B. Melton, Jr., for a replatting°fthe lot
on the southeast corner of Lindsey and 8endolph. The replatting was
apparently denied the first time because of the size of one of
the resulting lots. Mr. Melton's plan for replatting also carried
with it a request for a five foot variance. Some of the immediate
neighbors were notified by Mr. Charles Watkins, staff member of the
P. and Z,, of a meeting of the Board of Adjustment on March 10 at
which time discussion of the request for the variance would take place,
The addacent property holders were nol notified by the city of the
meeting when the replatting was discussedi some of the neighbors
learned of this meeting of the P. and Z, as a result of an open
letter that Mr, Melton was circulating in the neighborhood. In
this letter Mr, Melton was seeking support for the replatting.
A call was placed to 11r. Watkins' office on Tuesday, March 4, in
order that more information concerning the meeting of March 5 could
be obtained. Mr, Watkins stated that the request for a replatting
had been denied the first time and he felt sure that it would be
denied the second time. He was specifically asked if those in oppo-
sition to the replatting should appear at the March 5 meeting with a ,
petition voicing their opposition, His replyt "No," In fact,
he stated that this was essentially a closed meeting and that those
in opposition would not necessarily be given an opportunity to make
their positions known, He restated this same position on Thursday,
t
Mr. Watkins indicated that the presence of those in opposition to this
replatting would not have had any effect on the con3iderations of
the P. and Z. Subsequently, members of the P. and Z. indicated that
the total lack of opposition at the March 5 meeting certainly con.
tributed to the approval of the replatting. The attached petition
indicates the existence of opposition.
Certainly the variance is not desirable to some. The 60 foot frontage.
of one of the lots is damaging to the integrity of the neighborhood
(and it's very difficult to see well enough to turn south safety
at this corner as it is); the variance merely exacerbates this
problem, But the larger issue concerns the propriety (or impro-
pristy) of the entire procedure in this matter. Rr. Watkins'
statements were unfortunate to say the least; to say they were
irresponsible is perhaps somewhat harsh but closer to the truth,
It seems that by far the fairest solution would be to reschedule
yet another hearing by the P, and Z. on this matter,
,
rN r
M
".~2~ rteniJi~~h ~
Denton, Tr
1: ;v'd r 1 ; =Q I
F I n'119 and 7onfn3 ;omnl$Sion
City of Oanton
giant l ':men t
Ni uncaratand that A Punning and Zonlnq 'neat In0 IS uche du lad
on 1 9 h'arch concerning th.. proposed re-platting of the lot on
the corner of Kenifolph and Lindsey, 3inc~ ,ae fiv? In that
neighborhood and consider such Activities of fntare:4t, vi re-
3rat that vt have a previous c~)mmftment that viii prevent our
Attending that meeting.
In Ileu of attend?nce ve are sending thin note to Indicate our
concern about thld matter. tGur undaratanding Is that tne ;:ro-
dosad rep] attI..j oitII result in the .tddlt for to our neighbor-
hc;,d of t~vo lots that are iach amallar than any of the lots In
the vlcinlty (maybe 606 smaller). Mile technically acceptable
under the prevailing zoning, they are out of place in the exist-
Ing neighborhood ad It had evolved, ie f?ar that the approval
of this request may set a precedent that 1111 allow the degrada-.
tlon of the character of a now well-establlohed neighborhood.
as request that the proposal for replatting be denied. The
original plat of this property fo In line with the other proper-
ty In the vicinity and will tend to maintain the nelghborhood's
character.
3lncarely,
Catherine F Conrady
)enls A Comedy
C
a
~ /fir' " % ~
1.. Gr ~ ~ ~ /.,r ./.✓,,.r' ..!L'L L'i r ~ v.Go.L 1 r-t•,,:•t_
r
.
l r
' y. y~-G.•.(~ r:^ ~✓t Ski ~tti~ ,~(r r ~.~Cw. ~ rw ~.L~~~
r '
rfrr. r`.~, fZ'JC:.C.trC-,•!<%. .`G.%w~6r-a '~`.Y•C✓
tir l -•Li f~.~./ ~t':G lY \r /r (.J~/' rY'~ Lire ~-G •~.4' '
j ,
~ r rY
.i •v, / : i •r~.:vf rGCL." ~ Gi' ~'a-G~i. ! f rr ~ / ~ • r
M. / , r. LAY
, ,ya.' s..I w i. 11 j:%/..r• .•.l';'• Y. w -I~C.1.~ _
Y~
LF sT it
e
t
A`~~-';r{r~rr' ~fl~^~ r' / 'fir,'. ~ti~:✓:'~ ' `'~~-"j
r
f ..f,`i~.. ! ,.r Vl i I 'j ,.'y I ~ .i'rI1 . ii .r. itiL i.
i i
~ . ,I of { ~ ♦ ••S✓7 ~ / ~J
i
L i
I
i ,
01
G ~
t
i
1
70
7
e
's
Fyn
691? ~
-7k JL10
0
h i eal
ti A4
all Z4 41
~ ~ ///may/''. ~ `c~'~° ,,;1..,
i
o-~- ~Il c=,z-c.
i
1
M
kJ,Cf e o
s l.., 'J 0'•0.": ~~.19 ':'2'. LC3 +t^: A...',1:. .'.~1.;.
',J :~_,.Y: ''QQ'~ ^.l._:3 +S• -
1)C7..1"1?'; co dttio:lz '1 i -i-
1V' t~1? 'a `.:1~~a. L"s:~ Oi 1
i1"1~~.?":tt t'.
T::i:: 0L h f c 21C::~
~~„~•3 p,J •.rl n.?i'Y n, Jt r ff
-3 L L '1 :r~'•11 .:.1y :f ~'t 31t)~ ~
'1 °Ic~ l: v7,' •J^.1 in,~'i: G' ~_l'? i r." i~~i«Ji'i tJ 'I r iyiJ. tt l y1i'
,1•y
t
V!
1I
(
a
Planning ani toning Commission
c/o Community Development Dept,
Municipal Building
E, McKinney St.
Denton, Texas 75201
Refs RePlat of Meltons at cor, of Lindsey and `'endolph
Subjeott Proposed Reconsideration by PuZ
G entlement
Since I may not be available on 19 March, I request
that this be included in the record and read at the reoon-
sideration proceedings if they are held,
I rm presenting this specially and not generally, in
order to suggest that the reconsideration of this matter
may not be prooedurally proper, coming at the time it does,
and after adoption of a recommendation for approval.
I suggest that approval of a replat which oonforms
to municipal ordinances is a matter of right on the part
of an applicant and is a statutorily-imposed duty on the
part of a commission and/or governing body, See Revised
Statutes 974a, part d}, I suggest that the Commission
acted properly in approving the replat at its previous
meeting,
Approval of the side-yard building line shown on the
replat was discretionary, and if reconsideration were pro-
per, a confirmation of the prior approval would be appro-
priate since it will result in the same side yard as the
house across the street and lack of such approval may result
in a conformin structure differing significantly from
established nolghborhood architecture,
For the reasons stated above reconsideration should
not be made but if it is, the prior approval should be
reaffirmed In all respects.
Respectfully submitted,
Ti, g, ideiton Jr.
15 March, 1960
riEicIYE:O MAR 1 ? i52,
r,
i
REPLY FORM
r Case No. BA-1203
The Board of Adjustment would like to receive your comments on
this case in order that they may make a better informed decision.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form
and return it'to the following address by -March In toad
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way effects your rights to attend the
public hearing and we encourage all interested parties to attend
and comment if the~► wish.
If you have any questions pertaining to the case, please call,the
Planning Office 4tt• 566-8350.
REPLY RECEIVED MAR 1 2 1980
I am in favor of this variance,
I am opposed to this variance.
My reasons and/or comments are as followsi
44 ea 171
1 ,
~C4iL X~ r,Si tore 7
o • Address ISII « e 6j 1DUAA.'
Phone No.
•
k
.:a
h
REPLY FORM
Case No. BA-1903
This Board of Adjustment would like to receive your comments on
thia -case in order that they may make a better informed decision,
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form
i
and return it to the following address by march to. lgao
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the
public hearing and we encourage all interested parties to attend
and comment if they wish.
If you have any questions pertaining to the case, please call, the
Planning Office lit. $66-8350.
RECEIVED MAR I t 19AO
REPLY
( ) I am in favor of this variance.
( I am opposed to this variance,
My reasons and/or comments are as followsr
d . 9.,~ fl ' j U'
01
A." .[Ld. ~Q.Lig- 1YYAAf~..rC2'M~R' ~a_,~ ~~1_ ~7: ~ii~~. ~ Q,• ~,,.t:.,.a~,u,L $ig>!sature 'f;~~., .l~d',~tf-,~ ~Q
Address 'n
Phone No.
t
i
i
- XJ:VLY FORM Case No. BA-1203
j The Board of Adjustment would like to receive your comments on
this'ca9e in order that they may make a better informed decision.
y f you desire to express an opinion, please complete th
and return it*to the Sollowing address by this reply farm
i City Planner
Municipal Building '
213 East McKinney
Denton. Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects
Your
rights to attend .the
public hearing and we encourage all interested parties to attend
and comment if they wish.
If you have any questions pertaining to the case
please call, than
planning Office Itt,566-8350,
.
REPLY i `BAR ~ 198
1 Y am in favor of this variance.
00 I are opposed to this variance.
E My reasons and/or comments are ns follows: let
F G ~ ~
Aox
Ad X,4 r
Signature
Address
`,v / Ei/// ,
phone N
I
i9tii3 / n. .f /f,o Tic .u ~~,p=Sc .e/ T ip )v
1'~ de
uN /eeiVe)[L~N LIZ A) r
'/`'/.~•"'c'~~ cv'// 7"Hr F~~Gi: C` ✓/1Cbn;ption.
I
`Ttn: 7'f.~ r o;%~~it to r, r S~ >G /~t'F, ~,~:s r T~~i~! y'//c° Gf=/=i c:= <X
I ~ TyC r sf.~.T,L/1•4~ t.~.fe~'
/1 /nri M Lo, M Fo w--1 Fc r!`.o G't /-r- LI, oz
/Ji1r.r~ L'~.~• fe V T a 1u i L L s tUl,•c:.) . s CIA e'
'/L as /G.a~7<<l NE a~ /J Cv.c. S/sf ~.i. c y ~NIr} /'~rofc~c•J'' ?.pt s [rv7` ~"`~.,,i.r F
G WN•' ~ ~ ~Ca~e-.L~ f ~ ?'ate a~ G'f.vs ~~l c. alria~.~• j.L/i1 Gc.a✓C/~ J1t o=
G f' ~ c•..'S~~ o~A rTL ~ CG'.+L,c/~ /y ldn %?i Li I~.rr.
1
t
4
1
4
[f
i
F
i
i
r
h,
REPLY FORM
Case No. BA-1203
The Board of Adjustment would like to receive your comments on J
this-case in order that they may make a batter informed decision.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form
and return it to the following address by MArch In Loan
City Planner
Ir Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the
public hearing and we encourage all interested parties to attend
and comment if they wish.
Y
If you have any questions pertaining to the case, please call,the
Planning Office 4Lt,566-6350.
REPLY
( ) I am in favor of this variance,
x ) I am opposed to this variance.
My reasons and/or comments are as folloiasr
(see &t*& hWd• letter)
Signature
Imo`. _
Address 1610 Kandoloh
Phone No. 382-2035 (home) f88-2403 (o ific+
i
I
a
1510 Kendolph
Denton, TX 76201
March 3, 1980
Mr. Charles S. Watkins
Development Review Planner
Municipal Building
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr. Watkins:
diagonally across wife and I intersection own a from the house Mal 1510 Kendolph
thas
We both object to the petition of Mr. R.B. ,Melton, Jr, request-
ing a ton property at 1605 xendolph 5 foot side yard setback variance for a proposed house
at 1601 Kendolph.
In the first place the
the intersection and wouldpcausehautraffia hazardobylblocking
the view of drivers entering the intersection. a the
new houses being built on Willowood, there will betmoreltraffic.
In the second place the lot in question is very long and narrow
with a row oe large trees on the south aide of the lot, To
avoid cutting the trees, a builder would have to set the proposed
house squarely in the middle of the lot and, of course, build
a very long skinny house. Such a long house built practically
on the sidewalk will be aesthetically unpleasing from both streets,
In the third place Mr. Melton, Jr, has given us the impression
it f rent chat the houseowould not.be W for swse do tshiat he would either live
party in the neighborhood, we do object to rental propertylmanaged
Sr. the Mhisonso particularly R. B. Mheroho Jr. Since Mr,
and wife bought anoLouse acs
have been renting the house at 1605 xendolphf bothstheohousedandl
the yard have been in a state of disrepair even worse than before
their move. The corner lot on which tho
built is continually overgrown with Woods andobriareuselnsfactbe
p
one woman in the neighborhood took it upon herself to trim the
bush at the corner of Xendolph and Lindsey to give better visi-
bility to drivers turning the corner. We understand also that
the present rental house is maintained by R.B,,Jr. and that
whatever maintenance done is of the patch and piece variety,
Fourthly, Mr, Meltor„ Jr, indicated to us that he wants to build
the house himself. He had hauled in a number of scrap items
and stacked theta by the old barn behind the Melton house, which
i ,
is not only an eyesore (with its rusty old car and overgrown
weeds and briars) but also a fire hazard (it did catch on fire
last year). Are the scraps of lumber to be part of the new
house? Are the used plumbing fixtures for the house also? Mr.
F Melton's dilapidated pickup and homemade cement mixer are more
appropriate to the rugged individualism of the frontier than to
modern suburbia.
Finally, Mr. R. B. Melton, Jr. indicated to one of the neighbors
that he hoped eventually to develop the large plot on Xendolph
south of the Melton house with rent houses similar to the one
he wants to build at the corner of Lindsey and Kendolph. The
area is zoned SF-7, which evidently requires a certain size lot
and house. Since that property is about 275 feet deepp, Mr. Melton
suggasted that he could divide it into lots 60 feet wide, thus
squeezing in a larger number of houses. Such a series of rental
row houses, whose renters have not been known for manicured yards,
would mean certain doath to a quiet and beautiful neighborhood,
Because Y teach a night class in Dallas at 6r00 on Monday nights,
i will be unable to attend the hearing. i certainly hope that
your Board of Adjustment will not grant this request.
Sincerely yours,
CharleB. Mart~n
Darlyn D, Martin
x
Y
•t
F
- REPLY FORM
Case No. BA-1203
The Board of Adjustment would like to receive your comments on
this ease in order that they may make a better informed decision.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form
I
and return it to the following address by March 10, 1980 i
City Planner
Municipal Building
( 215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 16201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the
public hearing and we encourage all interested parties.to attend
and comment if they wish.
If you have any questions pertaining to tho case, please call,the
Planning Office jLt,566-6350.
REPLY
I am in favor of this variance.
(y) I am opposed to this variance.
My reasons and/or comments are as folloias: _
j
r r
Signature +
Address X(A
Phone No.~...
I
-
~A- f2o3
1601 Lindsey Street
Denton, Texas 76201 RC21;V»~?i't 7 ~04
March 3, 1980
Mr, Charles S. 4atkins
Development Review Planner
Office of Community Development
Municipal Building
Denton, Taxes T6201
Dear Mr. Watkins,'
R. B. Melton, Jr. has spoken to us about his request to replat
the corner lot located at Lindsey and Kando,tph, Although we are
not situated near enough Mr. Melton's proposed building site to
receive a notice of his variance request, our lot adjoins the
Melton property on the Lindsey 6treet aide, and we are concerned
about his plan to build to close to the corner. Because of limited
streets in this neighborhood, both Lindsey and Kendolph carry more
traffic than many residential strestsl traffic is likely to increase
as new families move into the area now being developed south of
Willowwoods The land on this corner slopes up sharply from the
street, and for sometime overgrown shrubs have made it difficult
for those of us who live in the neighborhood to sea around the
Melton corner. Mow much more our vision will be limited if a house
is built a more 20 feat from the street, as Mr. Melton has pro.
poaads
Clearly, the Meltons are trying to get as many lots as possible
from this land, While we cAn appreciate the financial advantage
this would afford them, the recent trend in this immediate meigh-
borhood his been toward larger lots. In the past five years
three houses have been built on If acre lots adjoin ng or situated
very near the Melton land. Mr. Melton's plan to build modest
rental units on small lots would certainly not enhance the property
value of these homeowners. Wo have no reason to think that ad-
ditional rental units would be better maintsinad than the property
surrounding the 16GB Kendolph hours, which the family now rents.
The land is seldom mowed garbage which blows into the shrubbery
remains there indefinitaly, end an old barn is surrounded with
an accumulation of boards, plumbing fixtures and a rusty auto-
mobile which has not been moved for about a year.
chile we realize that the city cannot control the building of
rental units, we hope that lots can be kept a ressonabie size,
and that a house will not be allowed only 20 feet from Lindsey
street, blocking the view at the Lindssy/Kendolph interractions
Thank you for your consideration of this problem.
Sincerely,
Mr, and Mrs, A. xilliam McCarter
1
REPLY FORM ~
Case No, BA-1203
The Board of Adjustment would like to receive
this case in order that they may make a better informed decision.
If You desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form +I'
and return it'to the following address by
• -~Gh_1 D ] Q8D
City Planner j
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Taxas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the
public hearing and we encourage all interested parties to attend
and comment if they wish.
If you have any questions pertaining to the case
please call, the
Planning Office At, 566-8350.
REPLY
X) I am in favor of this variance,
I am opposed to this variance.
My reasons and/or comments are as folloi+s:
A well-planned house on an attractive lot
Signature ~
Address R' Melton {Sr.)
81 Li 1t.yn.,.1
• Dr en on
Phone No. 383-3391
t
I
REPLY FORM
' Case No. BA-1203
The Board of Adjustment would like to receive your comments on
th-ts•case in order that they may make a better. informed decision.
If you dasire to express an opinion, please complete this re l and return it'to the following address by p y form
y Ma rnA In Teen
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects
Your rights to attend the
public hearing and we encourage all interested
parties to attend
and comment if they wish.
If you have any questions pertaining to the case
please call, the
Planning Office Ot, 566-6350.
REPLY
i
am in favor of this variance.
x am opposed to this variance.
I
My reasons and/or comments are as folloWOa
i
Signature
Address j 509 /
r~
Phone No, ~j~f Z -Z C02
k
April it 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider Final Payment to LVIFW Consultants for Aubrey
Reservoir Financial Feasibility Study,
SUMMARY:
In early September, 1979, the cities of Denton and Dallas
retained the services of LWFW, Inc., Consultants to perform a
financial feasibility study of Aubrey Reservoir. The Study
has been completed to the satisfaction of both cities and
LWFW, Inc., has submitted a request for final payment (see
Exhibit I).
FISCAL SUMMARYt
Study costs have been allocated to both cities in proportion
to the percentage of the safe yield to which each city will
be entitled. The City of Dallas will pay 744 of the costs,
while Denton will pay the remaining 269. Payments to date
are as follows:
TOTAL COST DENTON SHARE DALLAS' SHARE
4
Payment 11 $10,742.66 $2,793.09
Payment #2 $ 6,311,26 $1,640.93 $7'944.57
Payment #3 $4,670.33
$11,422,44 2L969.83
- SB,452.61
(final pmt)
TOTALt $28,476.36 $7,403.85
$21,072.51
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
Budgeted Funds (Account #04-50-85-02)
ACTION REOUIREDr
Authorize final payment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of March 26,
1980, recommended that final payment to LWFW, Inc., be
approved in the amount of $11,422.44 of which Denton's share
will be $20969.83.
Respectft.lly,
4
R. E. Nee son
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT Ir invoice
. INC. MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
Dallas Houston - Austin
}
STATEMENT
February 11, 1980
r Mr. Chris Hartung
City Manager
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
AUBREY - FINA14CIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY
January - Professional Fees $10o18l.25
Expenses
1,241.19
TOTAL $11,422.44
FINAL BILLING
E
7
i
12700 Park Central, suite 1805 Callas, Texas 75251 f214)233-5561
CITY OF D£NTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: April 1, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA) t
Consider final payment to Claude Smith Construction Company for overwidth
paving on Kings Row.
SUMMARY:
Claude Smith Paving and Excavating has completed its construction of Kings
Row adjacent to Kingston Trace, Sections 1, 11, and 111. The City of
Denton's cost is based on the cost of all improvements in front of the
electrical substation and the cost for extra width and extra depth of
asphalt on the remainder of Kings Row. 1
FISCAL SUMMARY:
519056.19 is available from the Street Department to cover this expense.
ACTION REQUIRED,
Council needs to recorr.,end approval of Payment.
h
ALTERNATIVES:
I
Not to pay the amount of $19,156.19.
r
li` STAFF RECOMMENDATIONSt
The staff recommends approval of payment.
j
EXHIBITSt
1. Memo to G.C. Hartung
11, Memo to Rick Svehla
.
' j
CA~
'Film I
p
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO, G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: March 27, 1980
RE: Overwidth Pavement to Claude Smith on Kings Row
i
Attached Is the memo from Greg Edwards showing quantities that we
r need to pay for. The original estimate was about $18,500.00 dollars.
The extra amount of money is for a small amount of additional paving
that we asked for. Funds are available from the Street Department to
cover this expense,
~
R Click ve 115a
b
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
I
TO: Rick Svehla
FROM: Greg Edwards l
DATE: March 24, 1980
RE: Overwidth Pavement on Kings Row
Claude Smith Paving and Excavating has completed its construction of
Kings Row adjacent to Kingston Trace Sections 1, 11, and III. Tha
City of Denton's cost is based on the cost of all improvements in
front of the electrical substation and the cost for extra width and
extra depth of asphalt on the remainder of Kings Row. The quantities
are as follows:
Item ~i
Unclassified Excavation 20 C.Y. $3.25/C.Y. $ 65.00
Concrete Curb acid Ater 40 L.F. 4.40 L.F. 176.00
Concrete Drive Approach 204.4 S.F. 2.00/5.F. 408.60
Lime Stabilization 1,625.55 S.Y. 2.25/S.Y. 3,657.50
1 112" H.M.A.C. 11594.44 S.Y. 2.55/S.Y. 4,065 83
4 112" H.M.A.C. 1,594.44 S.Y. 4.85/S.Y. 7,733.06
1" extra depth H.M.A.C. 3,050.00 S.Y. 1.00/S.Y. 3,450.00
SSJ,156 19
We have verified that these quantities have beery installed and that we
have ir.spocted the construction and tested the materials to assure our-
selves that the improvements were installed in accordance with City or
r Denton specifications. We have received the tine year Maintenance Bond
and feel that the payment to Claude Smith Paving and Excavating should
be $19,156.19.
J
April 1, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #
SUBJECT:
I
Consider Participation in oversize 16" Waterline along IH-35W.
SUMMARY: 1
Bob Jones, a local developer dba/JJ Construction Co., is
developing a site on IH-35W (See Exhlbit I). The City is
requiring the 16" main and will participate in the difference
between the lb" and 8" required to serve Mr. Jone's
development.
FISCAL SUMMARYr
3
Low Bid
Cost of 16" Line $37,518.10 $26.99/ft.
Cost of 8" Line $19,794.00 $14.24/ft.
TOTAL ^OST TO CITY $17,724.10 ,
Source of funds: Bond fund projects included in 1979-80 Capital
Improvements Plan.
ACTION REQUIFh'D:
Approval to participate in oversize 16" waterline.
i
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Participation in the oversize line.
a 2. Do not participate in the oversize line and allow Bob
Jones to install and pay for r,n 8" line.
4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utility Board recommends the approval to
participate with Bob Jones in the oversize portion of the
waterline.
Respectfully,
i
R.E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Map
II Participation Agreement
111 1979-80 Capital Improvements Plan
s
II 1
W / i ~ ~ Y pj N it
29.411 ac.. ka
` / tJ
{era's ~ itr
• f :.fir 'r.~~/ ~ / :1 i /y/ .1•
,lea
'I I ♦ y /
PARTICIPATION AGAErISET~T
'THE STATE OF TEAS X
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESLTNTS t
COUNTY OF DENTON X
THAT WHEREAS, Bob Jones is the developer of
certain property shown on the attached plat, which plat is
incorporated herein as if set forth in full, in the City of Denton,
Denton County, Texas: and desires to serve such property with
r ,
olfaite water facilitiest and,
WHEREAS, The City of Denton desires that such offsite water
facilities be oversized acid the City will participate in the
additional coat of the oversized facilities pursuant to the
provisions of Section 25-74 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texasl
NOW, TSSRBPORE, THIS AGREZ14ENT, made this day of
by and between Bob Jones
19 , Denton, Texas,
hereinafter called "Developer", and the City of Denton, Texas, a
` Some Rule municipal Corporation of the State of Texas, hereinafter
called `City"i
WITNFSS=s
i
1. The Developer will install, by contract or otherwise, a
water line and appurtenances to serve the property described on the
attached plat in accordance with all City of Denton ordinances,
rules, regulations, policies and procedures. The said water
facilities shall be located as shown on the attached maps which are
made a part hereof for all intents and purpos*r.
2. The City's share of the estimated coat of said water facilities
is $11,724.10 . Upon oonr+etion of construction and acceptance by
the City of said water facilities, the actual cost of the City's
1.,.6-tieipation in said facilities shall be determined and certified
t`
to by the Director of Utilities and his certificate setting out the ,
City's cost of said facilities shall be attached hereto and made a
part hereof.
3. Th7- City shall pay for its share of the facilities within
thirty (30) days from the date of acceptance of the facilities, or
under such terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable to the
parties.
4. Title to said water facilities is hereby and shall at all
times be vested in the City.
5. The Developer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and
hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability
of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or third
person occasioned by any act or omission, neglect or wrong-doing of
Developer, its officers, agents, employees, invitees, eootractors or
other persons with regard to the performance of this contract, and
t
Developer will, at its own cost and expense, defend and protect
against any and all such claims and demands.
IN WITNESS MMMOF, this instrument is executed in
triplicate orillf"I s this day of A.D. 19
CITY OF DERM, TEXAS
BY
ATTESTi
BROOKS BOLT, CITY SECRTARY
CITY OF DWTCN, TEXAS
Bob Jones
I DBA/JJ Construction Company
BYt
ATTESTS
{
RIBLIC UTILITIES WATER t SEWER
5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1979-80
Sewer Plant Expansion E2,115,000
Hickory Creek Interceptor Step (11) 380871
North Lakes Park Water line 40,000
North Lakes Park Sewer Line 40,000
Oversize Water 11no 110,000
Oversize Sewer Line 110,030
Rockwood Street :ewer Line 15,120•
Cordell Street Sewer Line
Cordon Street Sewer Line (Hwy.380) 64,260
Hlghiand Park Road Water Line 27,540
Kendolph Street Water Line 40,060
Cleveland Street Water Line 29,700
Audra Lane Water Line 68,360
Wester-0 Water Line Ib8,480
'Water Taps, Loops and Meters 43,200
"Sewer Taps (253,405)
( 68,120)
)
Lift Stations Alarm System (321,525) 180000
Lift Stations Backup Pumps 100230
Lift Station Portable Pump _ 11, LOO
"Community 'Development ProJects 32,900,56!
A. Crawford Street Water Llne ( 35,000)
y B. Wood Street ( 350000)
C. RuddelI Street Water Line ( 3`.000)
D. East Oak Street Water Line ( Io,250)
E. Vine Street Water line ( 35090)
F. Bradshaw Street llater Line ( 36,800)
G. Daugherty Street Water Line { 380700)-
11. Vine Street Sower Line ( 29,700)
26 , 0)
1980-81
Sewer Treatment Plant $ 194,722
Hickory Creek Interceptor Step (111) 102580800
Oversize Water Line 1(7,000
Oversize Sewer Lint 117,000
Elevated Water Tank 585,000
Normal Streot Water Lino 35,100
Windsor Street Sewer Line 93,600
Haynes Street Sewer Line 14,040
6rogg Sfreat Sewer Line 14,040
,facer Plant Pump Addifion 92,bOJ
'Watf,r Taps, Loops and Metn*s (I970(14e) T1, 521,902
#Sewer Taps (2,970)
Inrn nt ul
)1D_C611L~1[ [~%!G''r1~Ge '7>l~u~r, ~
)PEN
~~L
T#R a 6DOR
Efi o~It' _ E €F V~FiTib V~ V>[F" V)R[~ii- I`fJ~f`
n oco 1o -
~sa;s o-►s
7 6o4 USA) -
a
L~_ $9do y7n,'tl /I71v ° I ; r,
let-,
r.
f
'MMORANDuM
DATE OF MEETING: April 1, 1980
AGENDA ITEM: Bid 98748 Pickups and Van
SUMMARY:
This bid is for the replacement of a group of vehicles to be used
by the various departments in the City of Denton. Thirteen vehicles are
motor pool replacements and four vehicles are additions to the fleet. The
fleet additions are one 3/4 ton pickup for the Airport, one 3/4 ton pickup
and one 1/2 ton economy pickup for Electric Metering and Substation, and one
3/4 ton van for the Water Meter Department. The units being replaced will
be sold at public auction after the new unite are placed in service.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Both invo in the poolthirteenand
anddonlyddepartmental buded
get funds for the fleet additions.
Motor Pool account 906-00-67-07 $ 39j407.36
Budget Fu%ds Capital Expenditure 64 49.73
Total Purchase
X103,857.09
ACTION REQUIREDt
Approval by council and award of bid.
ALTE____ RNASI
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
We mako the following recomwendations.
Item 91 to the low bidder, Denton Datsua for $10,860.00.
Item 92,4,5,6,7 to the low Sidder, Banner Chevrolet, total $85,792.05.
Item 93 to the lowest evaluated bidder of Banner Chevrolet in the
amount of $6,903.72. Bill Utter Ford has bid a price that is $1.23
lower, however, the Chevrolet bid includes 8 ply 8.75 x 16.5 Steel
radial tires and the Ford was bid with 8 ply Nylon 8.00 x 16.5 tires.
EXHIBITS:
Tabulation sheet.
Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Asst. Purchasing Agent
DID f 8748
DID` Pickups 6 Van Banner Bill Chester Denton
Chevrolet Utter Morris Datsun
OPEN- 3/25/80 2100 pm _ Ford Chry-Ply
ACCOUNT M
QTY. "CIPTION---' VENDOR- VENDOR -VEWD-0--- -VENDOR VENDoR V VEM EWOOR-
ton_economy 22 430 00 -lit 79 36
_2, on full size fleetside P.U. $5,435.53 5 596.9
t n flleetside ai,ESjpBAT,AC $6.903.72 $6.902.4c
-A. 4 314 ton fleetside gickuo 6 14 6.4 _
--5- tit 214,09 _Sfi4256.],
I 111A 3, ~+n cah 6 c
nn Vae $6.325.02 $6,926.5 7 237.67
8
palivary 45 days A3 days 45 days .45 days, _
r
1
I
i
i
r
1
f
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
Dates April 1, 1980
Agenda Items P.O. 042187 to Darr Equipment for repair of our
equipment 9936
Ssuearys This Purchase order is for the emergency repair
of caterpillar 816 compactor used at the Solid
Waste Landfill - to recondition the transmission.
j The work has been done and the equipment is oper-
ating now.
Fiscal Summarys Budgeted repair 08-03-83-43
Alternatives none
Recommendations Approval of emergency P.O. 042187 in excess of
$3,000.00 for repair as shown on invoice 0061213
and attached.
Exhibitas P.O. 042187 and inv. #061213
tubmitted Sys John J. Marshall, C.P.M.
Purchasing Agent
t:
i
1
a
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 42187
6111262.601 D/FW Metro 261.1042
VINDoe NO. GATE 2/8/80 uo NO.
TEM11 NET w.o. No.
Darr Equipment DELNM GATE ACCT. NO. 03-98-87-10
P.O. Box 20737 SINF VIA
Dallas, Texas
Tot CITY OF DINTON
Vehicle Maint
804 Texas 5t,
Denton, Texas 76201
ITEM CITY STocx Numse DESCRIPTION OUAN. NIT PRICE AMOUNT
Rig q 9936
Repair Trensmieaion
Cli ;e C I• L^^
OFlIrIC,f f, L.,
0,'
7, 1F 2+15 l62J1 ~T,
ra
aoR~~;c~.
OW ►.0, NO. ON ALL SHOHNENTS, OELNEItY MxETf, INYDICEf, ETC.. 6EN plypCEf M DUPLICATE TO AC
SHOW COUNTS MYMIE. THE CITY Of OENTON,
TE11A5 If jXIM" FROM BADS TAX AS NR NOUNS SILL 020, THE CITY OF OENTON Ia MOHISITEO FROM FAY1NO FOR MERCHANDISE SEFORE IT IS
RECENED. ALL SHIFMENTS MUST IS F.0 S., CITY OF DENTON, TLU,S. DIRECT ILL INOUIRIES T0:
CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT.
216 E. MCKinney By
Denton, Texas 76201
FORM NO. 011210
I]JIDARR CUSTOMER'S COPY
EOUIPMENTCQ
REMIT TO: P.O. act 5552 006060, Tali 76265 •214/576-2000
CITY OF DENTON N PE ACG0.MRIAMR 6notaMAM7R An
ATT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 214750 061213 3/11160
215 E MCKINNEY TERMS. Nt M ► X. 106 3 WPDrp MIT, PA$T
DENTON TX 76201 WT A~~y1N~P ea hu nr6. ~~ICm.n to .
I~ P~AR LN DAWL A9 wI aAAU csI.OAM/9 pW1 0~
p:V%10 in Dino =ty T1911 nor.OR •ME D1
69a ALL COAR66PONDENCE TO: P. 0. INOX 20737
OALLA6, TEKA6 76220
SEE CAT QUALITY IN A SMALL PACKAGE.
ASK YOUR CARR NAN ABOUT THE 010 910, 931
r
00013! 1 12111 J71a10 3/07 016 57000621
ENGINE MODEL 3306 ENGINE SEA UL NO 3444730
ENGINE ARRANGEMENT 4N7370 MACHINE ARRANGEMENT 3Y 910
AUTHORIZED BY JAMES BISTICK
NO 21319 -
TROUBLESH
Y A r4 1 METAL
EMa
CLEAN MACHINE y~ r
All
R It 1 TRANSMISSION COL-RTE.R 4 IN9P-
BOx
2 1ASS22 CAPSCREM ,0WY~ 8CH .36 472
1 A 394'501 LOCKYASH O Lot .09 •40
2 104719 NUT y; 3N~M, , *At .05 410
2 4K7502 BOLT ~ j~ 7
1 4KGS16 iNDICATO ~.i1~'~"16rl2 F, i C1~ 021 012
090 22673 22473
1 A 591770 SELL 0 R SNP 4.00 4000
ITEMS NOT SHOWN ARE BACK ORDERED at
"I NNrr! °A" r. MMrA- WON AN 161 Ryl w werR.r+a
RrOys or /carry ht N N i W4Mm W N rM/r WMF 10 Mf
% g
nrk *1 00 go wi N A. N if urww y1e4 tyro, fa dwmw Aaf"H "Al M RAW • 10 dt"
TOTAL
r
IDIDARR CUSTOMER'S COPY
EgU1PMENTCQ
MAT TO: PA sox 366l,Danes, Tomas 76266 214/610-9000
I
A Ap..DW► tAA`IA tYY011,'j AAlt1U
CITY of DENTON RAIL
:14NT[[SPPO7fpp 1~tt Cp77(~ 006121) 1 3/16/10
1 T[IIM6: tDU[af AC~UnNdpTl6 wM I~i ~Allairy DAIL4.S. wd1A1
n0T 7AR W DALLAS wA be erfdtld YN c t? of
eoAfa !0, AA plYm/ntt proridf0 S, 11.1p be
i DAt1h~f h ~Aff County, Ttus,
law ALL CORR[S►ONDENC! TO: O. 60% 20737
PACE 2 CALLAS, TL11A3 76220
A
42117 JT$5$0 3/or 616 STU44621
0LT 033 4*44 4.40
8
CAL 10N 01L BCN 02! •58
CAL 1011 al 1270 7030 1`.50
OAL 32x0 s.e0 5.00
738 0
27.50 Mesa
eoNO TRANS CoMV : fi~
P sox:
W, 450$ l01KWASN N LBE •O2 20
6 783239 CAP 3CAE •
1 $86599 PLUG OCCK 421 1.25
4 12
12 104717 NUT 11.02 11.12
700691 WASHER
764$96 NAT .12
1$
MASHER #t.": NAT 1.16 13•92
1 1M6112 BACATMEA ''prc r WAT 2+0$ 37444
2 9M3249 BEARIN4 7 ~ p.tr, 211 243 2,63
2 2X9092 4104 y'~ •'r A`:• iS3 X2040 9020
1 3K0196 GUARD 099 1.91
6 401 1.21 1024 l
4E AS NOT SHOWN ARE JACK OAOERED BCH
~I m1r1IA "l' If nea-WWOW AA 11 myfl N K'IOn111rtl4 111 A
Nf'•A+6 *w of N N mW ewMtlee W N mf4 *f" q ate
: fit M M raw"d PON CMhr Aw OMM61t
11n mwt N mW wld* q yra TOTAL
1
I]JIDARR CUSTOMER'S COPY
EOUIPMEN T CQ
REMIT TO: P.O.101 3552 Donee, Texas 76206.214/570.2000
AuOWT MMMR Nvaa MAaMR DATA '
CITY OF OENTON 214750 041213 3110140
TERMS. "4 A10C~1R074p.~M 01~ S NPODINO 11 POINT. PAS;
1 W PAR MC ands A a PA RA O}LA7. VurWdo
NOT PAR W 0A14A3 waiig b• a06tod w16 e4f o
G014atbn Al p~mMy1 OrOV'd•d hu•On M•1 be
be 0 M Dllai OuntY. T•lla.
$$N) ALL CORPSIPONOENCI TO: D. 0. 106 20137
PACE 3 DALLAS, TEXAS 7ait0
I-
004839 B 42167 J7s880 3/Ot 816 S7U0062]
1 9N9740 ELENEN; 033 4.46 4.48
1 1P4231 PUN? C PBR 40206 402036
1 IP3450 TORE YAE 104061 164.61
4 A 3PTO64 SEAL SKF Za27 goes
4 031619 CAP sCA~ 3,`s K3"~A x e BCN .24 496
1 313440 SPRING,` MAd 1631 1451
1 435824 RETAINER , RBA 1102 11.32
1 456394 SCREEN 4~ ` a 081 11.0? 1 436603 TUBE A At**?
] i Most CASKET R i1 pp1 TAI 73.N T3.6!
]Iuz ' GBN 32!-139 32949
2 954191 PLUG p,.. 1~r1 Psi 4011 1.22
t 1T0205 RING' 093 49 4f
1 110210 BEARINi tw* 016 16.96 160!6
1 1TO234 RING 3'~v. IT r.~ a~ 093 1609 1.b!
] 1T1016 CARRIER tb;✓ EA.: !.S T 'rr7J'.~,ea99 206490 206890
1 ]T]O56 SHAFT 495 131016 ist.16
ArPLAEr TRIA131instay an COOLER
ITEMS NOT SHOWN ARE BACK ORDERED
nr marled " r• n fliw@W AI renaea M.1 bl wewp
AV00A w twWo oil. be In NN eeft"41 Md N mW 1= f0 blv.vMa
IL owdim e nw be M04 be ~ .wMb&a w+~ev re dead ewme +or e.wg• TOTAL
r.~ rr~ row.... yr r~..r r r r wr «r w r.....o rr ~.....r........,...a..o.. v
j]jjDJ%RR CUSTOMER'S COPY
EOUIPMENTCQ
n1NUT TO P'O' 0d1 3661.0166n, Tom" 76216.214/670-2000
t
Wi dNYOtCi MLNII _
CITY OF DENTON ACCr>law n~ bal
i
21
4160 qp oil213 3/la/a0
S. ~14
I rt ABC UMrTb~ F.0.1. S"PINO POINT. FAST
urW when V: i4AII °o1rt4
wME'~
PAR N AALLAS oil Et cr/dcod *I$ dCt of
tog
:eqliNon All
n Dena D1 tMnt1 provided hp 181 et~IN L41
Per Croantr, Tnu,
1
PAGE$END ALL C0APfv wNOe To.. 111. 0. Box 10?3?
DALLAI, TEXAS 1522o
001839 8 421sT J7e710 3/07 eib SiU00b2!
2 e 4F745 3N13:1 RING
1 1 1 RING SAE •35
1.10
1 i 3J1l07 SEAL SAE •3i •47
2 A SN4141 GASKET ! SNJ 035
2 i QNS2bi SEAL Q 1 'F ~'n 1 GOL off 1.71
1 5N913 1 CORE A 0t~ SKi 11618 7055
5 11 0200!00'
GAL CAN 420.94 420.44
X511 rre E 1240 SEN 11616 2!1•!0
REPAIR STEERING CTLjM AA ~S
INSTALL NEN SEALS
2 A INS126 SEAL•0-4
+~=A, ta-
2 2J3950 Nul a .,y ,a rs SAE 1.24 2.40
2 A 3J5407 SEAL A y.r~ns, MAP 81603 17.55
2 t 3J0200 SEAL M JJA3N2 10.81 71415
3 i GJ6017 SEAL Pf0 10032 70064
2 t IKifal SEAL 6SFPA V ~'1•s„~~tftY 5.44 1942
2 2Kf030 RING 029 216t9 4050
fi RIN1 MAP 3.11 b•34
~r "O1ie 40 "P1Ye'W^+. u n une mall w wdeeDrwd M6 NOT 6F10WN AR1 6ACK OR0IAED a.._
nrree r /eYy bl, w r een•pe IM w TNe *vla, q dre _
eeM16,F enr16e w16 w r.id1 do Y nhr1" Ye," C4Yn1 tr drape
,n-ty.e inn.t w Wale MMb 4 Yre.
TOTAL
I
I
1111DARR CUSTOMER'S COPY
EOUIPMENT OO
REMIT TO: P.O. Em 0152 00804• Tests 75285 111/6/0.2000
Au01JNl fAddlM - ~ ~MYpC3 MA~ OATS ,.:-ry
CITY OF OENION 211150t0T MCC 0G6l213 3/13/60
TERMS. ACt~~',,'~TFS 64W Ins SWPJNO POINT.. tPAST1
~Td PAR N pAt.I wN fA" a +p"d lost toll a
ttldtt'rom As ptymtnU Oiovlded Wean shop be
►evt In DAA,/ Ceunq. Tnet.
SSNO ALL COME6►ONDSNCE T0: P. 0. BOX 20707
PAGE 5 DALLAS. TEXAS 13120
004639 a 12161 J1essa u671816 57000621
2 I►1571 FLANGE IAL 1.016 3052 {
6 A SPOO93 SEAL 029 2.05 144+10
1 GAL IOV OIL 121,0 7050 1.0s0
TRAVEL TIME
LAiI
R 4 I IRAN! ISS16N.t a 3052 925600
RECONO TRAM doxv 4 ek ~ 3052 619000
OTHER LAIOV` rte' Mesa
TOTAL 60", s; y 2,i5~.36
1 MISC. HARDMAN ,INIRit ' ' ,•r+y* 6.93
SL"oRv IcE5
ITEMS NOT SHOWN ARE BACK OROEREO
Is mlrll/ "1" ♦e nen"em"" ALI #0,m most w am "o,
4,041 M dn1A4 All. w M"1Mdtlell IAd M mob *nhm 10 dNyl
:Wt" ~ Aw1 be eVS ~w" q YIN Ifft0r4d yl. geode G fa dA~nAre TOTAL
.r.--r r.. ~....r.....~..~rr..~.......rr~_-~...~....r .-.~..-r.r ~r.....~. r... w....r.~rr
I
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 1, 1980
Agenda Item:
Consider the final replat of Owsley Park Addition.
Summary:
The property owner seeks to replat Lots 1 and 2, Block 13 of Owsley Park Addition
into one lot in order to construct an addition onto the existing structure.
All subdivision requirements have been met.
Recommendation:
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the replat
of Owsley Addition. The Planning, Engineering, and Utility Departments have each
reviewed the replat and recommend approval.
s
b Action Required:
a
The City Council should move to approve the final replat of Owsley Park Addition.
Exhibits:
A. Memo
8. Map
~ t
i
IF
~ry
1 x--25 ( EAST 100.0'
l I
r
y I
II LOr S
8i-OCK I 13
I k
E I
f F
N
II n
!i O If , ; I
S I
r
e
NEST }00.0
s ~
~ j ~REI1~+
NTSU
it ~ t^_ __T { 9 2
al4sra `
-
~I
i
a F~
I
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 1, 1980
Agenda Item:
Consider the final replat of Schmitz and Ripy Addition.
Summary:
The property owner staks to replat lots 7, 8, 9, and part of lots 3, 40 S, and 60
Block 8, of Schmitz and Ripy Addition for the purpose of constructing an apartment
building.
411 subdivision requirements have been met.
Recommendation:
The Planning and Toning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the replat
of Schmitz and Ripy Addition, The Planning, Engineering, and Utility Departments
have each reviewed the replat and recommend approval.
Action Required:
The City Council should move to approve the final replat of Schmitz and Ripy Addition.
Exhibits:
A. Mpmo
B. Map
I
I
I
YfJ h
F
{
l1 91,
!fb 0'
N
*fit
I
w F LOT TA
i
+YI BLOCK 8
t
Jw „I
.~r.
b
a
1 s
ry
~t3f HOd
T 2 X A 9 STREET
f'r
i
~ / 777 J~' .
I i: Y• Y1I
EN D
OF
FILE