HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-15-1980
v
WS]
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
April 15, 1990
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council, TuesdLy,
April 15, 1980 at 7100 P,M. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building. Broadcast live on KNTU Radio, 88,5 F.M.
1. Consider the minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 25,
19801 the Regular sleeting of April 1, 1980 and the Special
Called Meeting of Aoril 8, 1980.
j 2, Public Hearingsl
A. z-.1441. This is the petition of Miss Karen Nash
requesting an amendment to a planned development (PD)
for detached single family housing on 45 foot x 100
foot lots, to permit multi family restricted (MF-R)
development on a tract approximately 7 acres in
eize. The property is located on the north side of
y the proposed Windsor extension, and approximately 125
feet west of Stuart Road. (The Planning 6 zoning
Commission recommends denial.)
B. Z-1443. This is the petition of Mr. Charles P.
Mulkey requesting a change of zoning from Single
Family (SF-7) to General Retail (GR) zoning
f classification on a tract approximately .5 acres in
f size. The property begins at the southeast: cornet of
the intersection of Cleveland Street and Eagle Drive
and extends eastward along the south side of Lagto
Drive for a distance of approximately 230 feet. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
0. Z-1445. This is the petition of Mr. Robert Nickerson
requesting an amendment to a planned development
(91)). The planned development (PD) begins at the
southeast corner of the intersection of State School
Road and interstate 35E. The original planned
development permitted commercial, shopping and i
two-story garden apartment uses. The amendment
proposes office, multi family, restaurant, theater,
retail shopping, hotel, and recreational uses on
approximately 90 acres. (The Planning and Zoliing
Commission recommends approval.)
I
1
City Council Agenda
April 15, 19A0
Page Two
3. Consider awarding bids on the Library expansion.
4. Ordina,cesi
A. !'onsider adopting an ordinance instituting annexation
proceedings concerning the petition of Mr, Jack Brown
and Mr. Neil Hill, general partner, Duncan Properties
Ltd., on a 6.53 acre tract which begins approximately
700 feet southeast of the intersect-ion of Colorado
Boulevard and Loop 288. (The Planning & Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
S. Consider adopting an ordinance removing parking on
the south side of Chestnut StrR-et between Avenue E
and Avenue D.
h
5. Consider discussion regarding location of electric meters.
if 6. Consider final payment on the McCormick Street Drainage
Project.
7. Consider extending the contract with Jagoe Construction
Company for the P.onnie Brae Improvement Project.
8. Consider adopting a Crisis Relocation Plan for Civil
Defense purposes.
i
9. Consider a contract with the Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc.
for umpire services for all Boys Youth League baseball
games. (The Parks 6 Recreation Board recommends approval.)
10. Consider setting the April 22, 1980 Study Session Agenda,
Ii. Consent Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by the staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement
each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations.
A. Plats
1. Consider the final replat of Paul Hammilton j'
Addition. (The Planning i Zoning Board
recommends approval.)
2. Consider the final plat of Daugherty Addition.
(The Planning & Zoning Board recommends
approval.)
i
i
City Council Agenda
April 15, 1980
Page Three
12. Executive Session
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
13. Consider Board Appointments
i
E ~
i
f
('jr
1
I
f~ '
t
k'l!,YrAry'~ cirf Camcil
Wmft 385
2S, 1980
tS 1gd0 R 'f Of the city
Camdl of, the C!ty of Deotan rasa
fir: P.M. is the Camei! Q:Ybar of tha tls,lo;pu BWldi'
I*yw
C,~ Pro Tor scepe,o Nmibar v.las City H,neger Cam,,
AttorW J.
AISEN Courl l 14rbars Stewrt OM C. and d rylor cad City saaaeaty ih~oob Holt.
and
` *ba eta w wSI at Ada F by vale ,
WA the +OCW W by St e tUt the strmta of W
a~p,qa 4ecial the Roplar Has c 1 1980, Z*rchh "1990 of wid 41 t.~ CouK11 171 tJhase 1r, ,I I ot}au aWroved Htiij t w~~N, ttr . U,%9.
zr.ft3:
right if wWo than hao ~60R~ it", line 6. the lotion t~j' vet'~e 1rtetT, '1ritA tiMcot
!n vidt6. Fbtim casziad, should rod 60
h i RMUC FEAR NMI:
A Public heet~!na vas hold to cauldrr a
a ZIV
M historic t potlm aan+dd Crasting a historic le,druk aaesewiimm
)byw Nash Va od the timing.
Q eulae,i a autia', oidiaanoaworval ew th.~.dq tiea of
+ Q "et»r,. hiatorieal tmiag and sal.ctirl~ct'~mgC,mb,n,kl10a+Cands,saa
cidtft OUtt rMidmt+~%Wq Oft ad;laSad or std MWO is oppaaitim
ba fotrad to eo41r. arcr ssd tlrt t)Nf' ~id~aota t to %mt *0 Rutoric
i Ha~rr~ thu emsldp,ad !a eRRda eta SA.
4stortt =°Caeai dosalt Bevr to ba 0e4wr+8e.deualt 11111t to be is
(Q ~t {I) A public honing hold os f'l/J0 tha
lot 7) ~++s,itiraeioa at GlS wfrar a m i Q), to ~
f ac1 t06,~
Y * Yor Hea6 &et z L31 hot.
new is eppMitioa t6. Attar Mu ft 1 Speak in &►os ,S&
see a 6tytBls Qes. ro ~tio. Aso that ura ITS Plu
1 *7 to hewn Penderb 11rle orpow 0R, F~ridea
that torte.
c+paltr is tha PAUC Lion. &dUtUS an III at thr nib thin is ed q rta l
*d" we ~Mde by vela,
appevrad. Fbtiaa Mtaded br Stapi,an, ehu t!r patittm be
pups
Front and 14!%U f~ w hou an 1•14u, the poutiaa at*. Jack
~ratiar of a 6, Ss sera front`` - PlOFn eia LtdE.w,a
f 700 feat eaud:aaat
weee
std Lop t~ir {
Nam the Marine, of the &ta'iaetim of
now in appMittiim tho h= IM closed; After Bearing !,peak in tam &W
{ apPtowd. fA4ftl n wsslMde by 1,0 ,eaaided
by ltapA,n, that do pat;tim be
J. 7fo Council w1! to haw eau
tl
r"Idant o Dmtm softbatl Ae:ociatim rvlwatl tto Ci eentatiYM Of
~t Nest esitteto pUy in the City sag tbAll tys pows,im to a11aw nm-
L, hK ne we aypsard to epaak
i
RNil\p~
P~J rAS~
886 Mutih::, 191ocmtisn,ea
4. The Camseil cauidrrd a preerItatica by rorpraantativsa of Ala>undat
Grant rd Cmpxay relative to ft amaal fisur+c! report.
kr. Buford Mod" of AlawAor Grant and Gassy said, "basicailf the
City of Denton is In sound financial shape. Gross atlas is aU¢tricity were down
and water and sever were up a bit". He added that aaoss the nation thaw is
tax L=ee refiatand and a dacmt bwA rate would be rays.
S. OADIXANi(935:
IU fol3od" Qrdiraw" were prooonteds r
((AA) Ito Oxmdl me~tt~oniac~o stder sdopting as ordinsna wadia J
eagle ixid''lt*f the! tea iive Z action OrdLuwA by seating a :rev ArtWs 2SA PressoO.
City Plaonar Jais Lmetta advised that this item has been under
diaassim for Over a yea. Before this itaa was pLaad m the Pleminr COW ..4m
almda a 01,21 was held m Pebr ssy U, IPSO for tba p apm of rwAsk tbtlrw
t+
ati dhw ~ Dentm ~ Camay ~orl~~Sociarty, alang with alfiect" SUN ;8ers
mode u this owdm46VinaLdi% a r*&ctim in the - v af'r to set v m
the Historic Laed•ar Cmiuiaa W the Qml of mmbere outiaaiq a quom
chop the town the Laulmonk 9msaWissithe City Mm*o:sAttonay as e to vop :ro)1 to
' Metim ws sede by Nash, sea*" by Vela to table the ordiAmdaa for
If
f. Pm•ee to csti spa` peo+eeed red tlwow oaf
juh
fie". Ammi x0mor d 9m we watt it. Os roll call Yea N f S~y~ 11 f ad N
(1) OnUmme !10.21 (Georg Hapidas} OF Tie ADa ® AS M APrAD tX m as OU OP = CP TW &h CPj &S~cAe~ SY
MVWU N0. 69.1 AND AS SAD} NMP APPLIM 70 IN WA USM PIIfJPlRf11 AS S~l9N
'1X1.1 un FN lm OfltCIAL ux w CO w = or DINi+a4 =40 m 15911 mm al.
LAALY m Bean tPl~4h AN OKLOM AN BOPBL'm 0.
Notate was ode by Nash, seoaMad by Vela that the Ordlneaae passel.
l tal voe YalrrgeuyStopinne "eve" ag4beg. 4 im o rAa••
p 0ediaaea 110•!2
M OIDWO 019= A IMi SSCTias 24431.2 OF CIGII'IM 24, M= = V Of IN CTI[
OF BRflai QCH CO 410nfAltaS AS MOM, lff17 1 "A SY7f2M !at IOt Ce DIITYA7SlD
[U1Bi0 S1ItVimr,i PSOvmw 69) T10M P31DVtati4C Pat A Oa.IC! MWIOK Lm
FCRIN S ma mm QI CA IQPOCMON (O AS M MW }1Mr1DIIW Vpi
11105 CIAMI
~I PIt mm A h &UR axLl AO =Law AM Bm.
Matdi s ws mode by Nash, soommolo d W Stephan that the Ordieee s be
mad. On sell tall mote ' Volt "o"", Stsoksim "ate sad Ned,"rye„. ' Moons
CD) Onuamas no-IS
AN MDWU Cf Im cny Q DQfICH TVA$ IIMIOYD!10 PA9XIND Gtl CBh1WM Pal0`2a1S
(F PflDQSt NO LDW 8IR>M3 3 06 = kii OF MOO A.M. AM 4:00 P.M. 1OtYtY
!}1101Aii PA W` PWMWG Pal AUlHU M TO Tai•AIMY ND MM VWCW ~AR~q
Of rdOU CUMIJX POllT1a1I CP POM AND L" 0= 1 PI10V1BW0 A SiVS1NiMn =
CLM; P110 N Pal WK Q Ca0 lCTWG OWDvx S Olt PAM 13lWi Pht MIW
PlTiALTWI PIOVIBWG PM PtIDUCATIat AND DBMUM AM WPBCrM BATB.
Motica pa lll led. On rail call vo~Vou'Itti", S iphens s"I oku W With`Isle" Ordiftorm be
da 'rti.d.
M
r
rza W~y
March 1S, 1960 Caatlta,ed
(1) ordt,~nte too-:1 39
AN arDTtiA M OF T1e cny OF DN?M. TEUS ;Qtt7# NQ PARCH CN
FRll~prr O ~R DV}L OF FEAR[ q ON P.N.. ~~1Y INOM OF
OMS= MwTJ A rn PAM Cif A =AII1
OP 1 PROMDG Fm Im BOVAL OF PAR6~aC *ftmw w C~ P0R7ICNS
YWagg pA
AND TkPa14 II1 fC RK b Qi pATW ~r 1~lIO A P ALnHMMjY 1 M~AOCY
PROVZDITAI A CB UN
CID OR PARTS Sl~PAAlI = CLIMr Pwvmna ME1LF ~ FMIM
BE AADC AN ~24g MIr PwnBl r1 PaWO,' lw; PROVM43 pOR~12PIJ! ID0 AND
'roil call vQte Iw Vol& w by St.~y, seeded b
L, VaL to table the Ordl+anp. qt
Stepinna nan„ ad Nast ^81/48" Mama S'~ad.
(F) S~Miaa9Ca i60-2S
AN l>i DWO CP TW CTIY CF BWM 1=
p A A 17'Y QailOmUm` II~iG "`~+~MOMW=
cTm x"rIH~ J ~ ~
M~ f 'IIVa CATgr PRavmnro A~1{~TM; MVMM PM Mcwu cm UCAT (MX AM C-
W wtiart ,era a.a. by gee
' ',.eaodad by vel. that the 0ma be
Q ~ as mu all vet. vl. ~.rn.
gaphea na~,~,. ~l „
%sh ~lotsaa JJ
o~ldnme, id0-ld . ~ 1
AN 0wDv"aP = CM or w=
tmrAr
QWWr IWO it~i. Am= a AIO ,q~ of P~IOVTDn~a"NOW PALQtq al WM M=,~
PIIOVIDL+o trit PnILCW 110 b I Na = pRf7i M,7~a'gp> aalg}P -
af>SC
r rlva Lntl.
was
J tabled. Oa ro1.i au vooiariii ^s"*jwW* WWJ „ by V.la teat tM O be
tarried. ephte6 ,ye" ad Na$ "Wau. *t1w
• I
R~ cedl MO.r
AN OrDDWC A1![ W OM.MVA -g NO 10-20 PAgRp AND , MW - MISLU
Rammw MW S~@IGfA~gYAM= SiI~CJ~@lroC a
Oa roll Call~Velli ;*to by, et~yy~ M ~ that the Windom be pub.
fbtlar easritd.
e. oNl,
G 50 &Aa ft RM6wa we
iem*Ao f* v traumas trl~N the Ae Citr of meta. *40 el t5e~ -
VWX cad Seta p. Railwoy ca*W.
'Wbl°tTp W( 't'0 ==I la A10 CK IiWU CP 719 ~
17! RAtlillY COPANY, COM AdRjj►~;yWM rte ATi CMP CM C r W=
AN6 SANlA
1 a lT ilS9UM By im Cny 00I ct Cr Im crlY a cmrlw, 11C1A6,
i SaL7z ' i.
The fA Ursby autlwrlted to WOM an
of tho
o e+ ow of Bich bah, ~lVWodd "Xf1~~7WSI anTom
d
n+er~ed hrreta end wade a part hotac, far
PASUD AN0 APPROYI+D thin 2Sth all
day 0! 14,rci,, 19M. pwpeeoc.
<L
1111C 1111,11114 hal iiirriiiiirwwqw,~~~
aTy CN. TEXAS
f4Y.M.W:4
$a$ MArch 21, 1960 Continued
APrBSri
LsL MAX, UM 9BCMLrLW
Crff CeP MN"' 71rA9 f
APPOW AS In LWAL FM e/
C.J. iAYU R, JR., Gaff ATiL M
a7y CF ZM rw. 7vA
syt -1st
Ik21m was made l Stephrse aeszodad by Vita that the Rasolutian be
Passed. on rail Call vote Vela l'ayr', itaP*'~ "aw, aid Nes h "aqa". maim
carried.
ftw to
erapite for and an heAsli the oCity of lut ~w~preaeoted aa~ri:lnS the
W*Nmat with, Missouri Pa ifi~ Railroad Ca mWs Psewr 11na croalssg
MM CM A MWZ2 4 IN NAYCR TO ®ISQNrd MR AND QV 11WM at Tl! Cm or am=
04 sLEMCAL PM LDNa 171DSSM AIM M. WAR = 14Sna PACIVW RAIUOAD
C!"ANY.
M rY ROMM K 'Ref C17T CCSe= 0! IN CP1Y Op DRetllf, =as
SlCri01 r. ty of
of el~ietrinl~pdNiW LIM a*K* apv~ des'sMad aka a wire blade" .
at Mile Poet UL 40, a eaoy being atta W beg ear mad made a poet here! for ati
;mpg so.
PASSED AND APPWM this the 21th dq of Muth, A. D. 1W.
j
A7rsSrs CTIY C# D~lelM. TVM
. a
CTIY Q Ds1d0i, Tom
APPWM AS TO LIM F=
C. J. tAYl1R JR. am Idiom
CITY 0P D1NteJf, 1Ab
sYs1a/
_6rStmphar uoosled br Vela t%A the Rafth tiro be
mptim rou tau voN vua "OW'o ItOdmas 1*00 rsd mash "aw. MRlea
carried. Cn
I
Passed and (SolON d ~ tat an Bak of~Denm
w dmpmmitery of City llada by maredlar mubperagsepA 1.
RtSO~ L_, tOH
MME, the C!b' of DOMM bat aotlfled all the bwJdg lmtitutiaaa within the
Ctty of ita latent to receive bid pplicstiasa for the art r of City bAws tot
a term bKlsasing on Ottobet It 1919, and ceding m SmptmmNr 30, 19611 and
vitMA elr City ddesir* ti be doilgasttedbae aL dram lnatltutiass
depamitery o! City j asd
*M", the A&M and "Wdf*1 by the UCl ~1,wereiedWang on the lath day of Sptmmber, 19790
. i
E
M~
I
I
MLmh 25, 1910 omt4mod 389
M8118Ll, :has rash VMLM the City Conch farad on the buss of the bid propoeala
that First State Seek of Denton, Term had submitted the proposal ofhrW the eoet
favorable taro and =Ajt l to the City for the hmdu4 of such fto l erd
MFRWi the RaaolwAom ppeuered by the City Caetiil m September It, 1979 duipatW
the First State Wk of Dentm m the depoeitoy of City fonds irrcorractly reedte4
the termatiem date to be September 30, 19W;
r llFAID~(Ad, 811 IT RE90LYW BY TSB CITY allmcm aF To C17Y OF DWW TUM..
SEICi'iQl 1•
itery19R 9o m pub and approved by the City Conch m the ltth dq
11*4
City !Inds is ip the the Stag beck DUN= u depoaltory of
read u follorahi &A ' that t the flirt PAM a I shall aenafter
i 1. ~ QTht U tSte hthebenir of Dental, Teas it heseblr !elected
toy hi City foods for a tees
~f an October 10 1979 end wAUS m Septobar So, 19tI.
SlCTr(P( it
C'7
t ReeoLrtim *AXE beta m effective luadiateiy wpm its poote red
W no
wmftL
Q PASM AM APPAM this the 2Sth of NracJ6 I W.
Q
j ArTffilr aly OF it~fflDif, MM
j ` CT'IY ~fi11.TyR1T~"'~"' Tum
lJ APFAOYd1.'d TO LM%L FOtit;
CCIT! CTAY. `~~2,JRCT1Y AS'1fl1~Y
irr1a/ x"
Puaed. OIL rMIM call %me olseyl&, "Corn d bl»S~p~h~ 6A tht AuoLtimt be
u:ried, 4e"o Stephens q~' Ird Nash ew. lotion
ON" City Pgrb awl L hdrio Shw~t. 1#di0n~ZVve diepaition of
33t. Itlrolcp ioa vet mde by Dele. by Nash to emeheria NO" Fro Tee
Projects. !oboe ~ far the ~aicrrl Neerlap on water
9, CUtl3R A02td4r
ides! YAgW f*A tt&W d ft he wood net m item MIO
Us loiatat the f(m o*Ut f C. of LhAkll t1 ad. we don► prior
lotion wu Made y~yy Sbi bee/, worded by Nu4 that the Ca1Nnt Ap ak
Ibtlae CWwleh 91.1, eaeeldeestion o2 furl teP of 1lddell Addition, removed,
(A) mm/ptma S! C9ID!!IS
(1) Pmrthue Order 142194 far ra~,if~ p~U At tir Power Pint
vpr'ored to Yeiwey Cosporetion in the awnt of=4,0 14 .SO, 1
Prlester (2) Purchua Order 142549 for eleetrie seetioaalittrs approved to
Supply covey in the croon of 5/,412,00
c
1
IM .iwal'N .i r_.... _ ...~.,..._~.........w •.....v,.. r,...,. r.n n.. n..r.•o
390 Mauls 25, 1980 Conamwd Order -44p1y COepany(ift the ta~tal am mtlof $313600.25. ~ uslt apeoved to Saylor
rne., for a total of $11,64S.50, Rib pentm. to the forest bidder, Topple, Ald o demolition. of Police Station (Damian anudnd to the(5)lm bidder,4Crall
Olden, Inc.0in the amount of 111 Parlor), Modam lfhdde]l Addition be M sppade by hgt s, seconded by Nub that the final replat of
zwW. im carried.
11. R1190IIffICh3s
The follwdnl Resolutims were Preasated:
(A) AT A R92W HD7IW OF IM CITY OM M OF rdl CITY OF f OW0
TEN, H" IK Im Hm lc pAL =Ulm OF SAM C11Y.
R D S'O L II'T' I'0 Y
1eWmW in tthe City of Dentoo~gmt, necessary fully PAChass. a a cartian tract of IoM
iY deerribed bal beldr; and
wed
mmm, the city Camcil of the Cittyy of Dentaas is of the opitan that the beet
Interest aid wlfars ad the public will be erred by the purchase of the pawl .
of reel stab do*W.L red belwp Mad
w
ow the City, of Denton mod 0101091' of add Toes Pm r t Light Caapany,
&P" 9
p oaeddaatlm at $1,191.93 is a !fits ens aReed' rater or aueft
NOW immdlg, m rr RESOtvo Ff To my Cm4Crt Cr 7W CITY OF mime, mm,
1. The City Attoemy is hereby muthorised to prepare whatever legal
documents we
frm the t~tn the try o! Dent pmt!' to deeaibtd balm
All that
in the City
Mdd arftft toe, No US wed albsobb lay pare ad be* part he S• C Him
D+acaa end Clara 1Yr Dsatma tM Tor Fawn Mad LIM Caepeny by decd itidJJ41r No
1924, end raerda Is Yolur 197 Paso 576 of the Der! Records of Dertoa ,
Tepee ens Mere patislmlr beedd ae h11aa C°1°~
MO Min the north boundary Ufa of said tract aid pp~t of
btbiaaitq lying
right at t w line of Do= Stsset ad also bNag the sasnehmsst
aaaer of a trta of Lad ar ooarmysd by Fraders. at a1 to Add ; La
Peg Sba by Mod Of the W" hands of mft= 19, 1D7T, end retotded' Sa Yol^aa T17,
CaoLy, Toast
41RIat south 1S' "1 20" e+et with the Korth Wmdat7 UN Of said Times Pwwr
and Light tenet, awn being the swath
ba40 liar of Let 1, Beek A
of the Sbsdy idtatrial pa} a distenn bf 40 bid to a post !or s aerarri
MWE south 47' 21' 47" seat a dlrtaoa of 106 feet, sloes or feu, to a point
for a coratr In the wet right of way liaa of Millov Prigs Mvt; l
T!tlam so+tthwt with the right of way line of Millar Drive a dicta" J
of 10 fat, on wr logs to a point for a Carlo in two 4" boundary lit of
said Teau Power and Liget Canary trot acid point also Writ the northeast
coeeer of a tract of led u convoyed by WU Lim A. itsethlas Tru" to Oak
Cliff Savingf and Lon baoaiation by deed dated My 2, 197.1 and reseeded in
Yolwe 750, Pap 702 of the Deed'Reeorda of Denton Canty, Taxul
D
end t OC north 174 40' 4r' wet with the south bdxday ltra of aid Texas Paver
~~and s~odlatl~m tralet d since of S7. t f~ast~to to poiint farraa
Mi ,1
March 15, 1980 Concussed 391
MM north 474 21' 47" sett a distance of " feet, more or less, to a point fat
a Cosner in the east right of wry 1104 of Duncan Street;
THM nordwly with the out right of my tine of Dureso Street a distance of 21
foot, eves or less, to the place of beginning and Containing 5,191.17 xpmra fat
of land, am or lest.
2. The City of Denton Ls hereby Awther eutharised to M Tema Paver
8 L! t Camay as owner of said deacribed proserty, consideration in the aaat
of 15,191.13 ra'rbw prim, plus my other necessary and reasonable Costa of
r Closing.
i
3. This Resolution shall tab effect imediattly from and after its
J pump and approval is secotdaoee with the provisions of the Denton City Charter.
PASSED AND APMM this the 2Sth day of Meschr 1910.
/e4
Em OR D~Va, TEAS
AT1TiSIr ~
M
M t
W CITY err mms =a
eZ APPRDVEIAS TO LIUL Mft .
Q C.JJ.~ YJL CCM AT11> W
• IYr /1/
by ~ acceded by mA d ut the RswIut
pfd Oa mean vew c*Veia "aye"► thaplsms "aye y own be
and Noah "syd'. Ibtiat
1
j M AT A RUM WNW OF M CITY Op WM W "6M aff OR DlliM►
U TEMS, HU VI 7M MMMAL IM M CP SAID MY.
R>lSOLpTtON
MERh", the City at Denton finds it ascamew to.p~ a certain. tract of load
e Looted In the City of Dentae► Toes, and am* fully described belavi ad
interest the CIt)P lo the C! of Deatme it of the Wisdom that the beat
of teal eetaa desedW belwwl and will be served by the Plea of the parcel
o
Dom ad owner parcels Cherldo Hi T
P 77 SIS0510.00 Is abd agreed vise of araek
rT7E#>Drdul, m IT m"Ir. ED {f TAE CITY COr Mt Cr TIE CM ip D two Tam#
1. 'iIW CCsitty~Attorney, is hereby emtherited to prepare Renews fetal
the baoer sheers! to Caent Dente ad" of so described bola
l
All that certain lot, tract or p~p1 of land lyitr3 and betas situated in the City
d Caa►ty of Dsntea state of Tesut d Ieitrt pest of the S. C. lilrera Survey,
Abitrfet !b. E16, W, be~~ part Of ~1tiCt A of the Pxpeeuwsy fAntrial park
( tab frrdustrial Park) in addition to the City and Caut'Tr of Dattm and
aLo beiat the Paireh Tact of land as am vvyed from firat T.ea Swings Law-
iatim of Della to Cbarlcia H. Tewnaon by Deed dated May 120 1912 and recorded
is VOL= 134 Pap 131 of the Deed Records of Denton Canty, Taus and rote
Perna sly j 4eesibed u follows:
Il011lfD0.1 at the saudma eotmr of said tract, said point of beginaing also
lying at the iabryectim of the east right of wry 11ae of Duuat Street with
the north right of way live of Dallas Drive (U.S. Hiesssy 77)1
1
i
r
r4gr>~
WWI
'IM Arch 25, 198C Continued
T}M north 1' U' It' out alms the last right of my tine of Duncan -;rest
NO being the welt boundary Iiue of said tssct, a distance of 107.29 feet to the
northwest comer of said tract;
MM south 17' 40' 4r' east along the north baunbry Lin of said tract a distance
of 109.9 feet to the morWM corner of said tract Said point also lying in the
west right of way line of KUM Springs D1•ive; /
lliia4cl south 42' 31' 17' most a1 the eat uioadary lice of said tract sane J
being tie wart right of 7 Line of MUM Sprinp Drive a distance of 140.0 feet
to the scutbeut corner of said tract said point aiso be the intersection of
~ west r~tof Nway line of 1KUM 9prings Drive with the north right of way Line DII'm (U. S. n);
7WIM worth 19' 231 181 vat along the south bonmdw Line of raid tract am*
bell 2tl*feet= rXt of way be of Da11u DrIV* (U.I. V.W 17) a diataoee
Plan of beginning red containing 6 b square feet of lid,
son or less.
Tmemn utwmneof mid deaD aSnbed ~ etdtarised to Par marLda H. prvwv
pmmhan price. P ocher aecesr sad ~ of .of 113,5W.00 cleft"
J. This A4eoLtlim sball Wow effect hom stately fear red Wtw its
Passap tad 41"WaL to aeootda m with h> provision of the pantos City amtw.
PASSW AND APPFDYW this the 2Sth do4 : C Huth, 1980.
ATTEST: aTr Dtr prlfiCM, 1lOIAg
i
a71OF WM, , allod'' ~
AP"ID AS TO WAL 10ft
C. J. LI tat JR., CL7Y a
CITY Cr W", TESAS
in /s/ yy
Paved. fin r esit rout Vela 'S ~er~c by Vela tbat do IWolutias ky
awrisd, Pbtea aye' sod mob aft", maim
12. Motim we lade by Veta, mended by Seep/rne to apgrortLe Older /t
Maias~earritdleethers far arerlq emtrect is the inetwsed asemt ed 5130,000.
U. The Cowu remand into hosattive Sonia at 9t2f P.S. to disa•s
I` I 1aW eaetrrr, [val aunt;, pftVowU mod bond oppoistsssts
lout no a Mail racaraned iato Abut Scrim at 10:10 P.tt, to am""
f acting was to be talon.
M11g dlwsnad at 10111 P.16
• F
-W]
Ky111Y!~ .
city CM:ncil 393
April 1, 1900
I9d0 att 7160 p=a of the Ln Me CouncilCC rhofCthe gziicip&ll,Auildirie. Tuasdxy, AF.iI 1,
PRESE4rI i'A'or Nash, Mestbers Vela, Stewart and FSmsly; CLY Attorney C. J. Taylor
and City Secretary Brooks Holt.
Mayor Pro Tae Stephens and ftey -sane er Chris Hartung were prjent the
latter part of the meetingg after a fight frtn NaablAom p, C. Ihere
they atterdod to City brsiaeas, aid also presented a procfastition to procLi Stp4lmj Urticippaated on itwo 144--17 of the folowing agenda.
.
1. RMIC HEARINGS:
(A) A public hearing was held, to c=;x* final action reeppardlnf the
request of the Praruting aM 2on'nee Commission for an e3tion of apprmdartely 314.9
acres of land belonging to Texas Tnatru msts.
cloned. The Ykyor Opened the hearing. but m one spoke, so the hearing we
M
Cr City Plsrmer Jahn tavtetta trlvised that tkt
wti non cow beffore the tiaeGyytlCCaaroiAl fr 4'flul actin atlttSion tt~ of Ili tihe.T PI14Aemrlrss
~requlraeants amswum CCe7leted the public hearing pra'~esn, cad all state
regarding Rmution have been mat.
The f0lIMD4 Otdinmte we presented:
OPDWAM,•E NO. 80.26 (Twa LUeruernts)
AN OR MNC8 Ak4E1 M A ma or " Of??riT M AND ADJAM To Tr? CTIy op DENTLN
• TEIAS; BElNO ALL m L171', TRACT OR PARCEL op Lim CoNSTSTTNO oP K'Pi871mW my '
13,719 b6STl IS 7 E PET OF UM LYM AND EADO SMTFD IN The CMW OF DFNfCTI WIM StAtn
M, A&, AW its $LT NO, 1406 T TI. N C LL 4D SfMo AASIRAa NO. 297, A. V{Il'9
TMAS; CLASS MM THE SAFE AS AQUCULTU M A" EDfSTR1~~=PROPPSM 140I D~KWDV '
AN PFFBCTM GATE.
pWasssed. On mution
aa3u ages Vol "S".01 , secard~i byNruly that the Ordinance ti
Motion erziad. ' Netsly syYq, SttMrt tyt acrd Nash 'aye
(B) A public hearts was held on tre petition of the Plion
I Zoning Cosaisaion r tins suit industrial (u) toning elattifiat *e as
Iftu oq= tcly 314.9 ant's !n list. TIA property ad located m the rsij
ont and rut of Bonnie Brat Ro This praptrty is
aeud bYj?amy xTaau res'tt~t
closed. The , nor std the heating, but no ant spoke, so the hearing m
The following Ordinance was presented
(MM U 40, 80.27 (Texts rutrumts)
( AN oRDrrWO AF 01% JM ZCNL40 FLIP of TM CITY CF DE";ICN, lFliA3
AMPM AS AN APPENDDI M no CODS Of ORDINANCES OF TM C17Y OP Di:4iK24,A5 SAHM TMEM4Gl! BY 69-2 nat DATI a;;'THS O<~PIC~rAL TAX~MAP! OP M ITYOi'PDEN~Tt?I, TVUSTM PUMY AS
MA
A, AM CM AMCIA-
ABLY DESCAIBPD THi IN; AND DBCLAAM AM D TOCTIYE DATE.
-Motion wen made b/ Stewart, seconded by Nensly that the Ordinance be
puled. On roil call vote Vela "m", Hensley "aye", Stewart "ye" and Nash "rya".
Notion carried.
1
i
i
a,
6~4~P1~
.
344 April 1, 1980 Continued
21 The Countyl considered a rommendation eras the Parks and Recreation
Board relative to the Policy concerning participation in City LeaPe sports by
nm•resi&nt team.
Assistant City Manger Xing Cole advised that the Parks and Recreation
Department had d recently ' revised yau fees, charges and policies pertaining to
the +4PrcvOd by the Canted on December 18, 1979.
Parks and Recreation requests that collection of fees from nm.Dmtm
team be harmlei administratively.
Motion wen made by Vale, seconded by Hensley to app=vs the request of
the Parks ad Recreation Department. Motion carried.
3. The Council considered adopting an Ordinance authorizing the issuance
of Certificates of Obligatior, Seriem 1980 (Library expansion)
The following Ordinance was Presented:
tRDDWKS NO. 80.28
(IRDDWCE AUTTSAf21N6 THE ISSIRM OF CERTTEICATTS OF OBLIO 744
Motion was made by Stewart, seceded by Parsley that the Ordinance be
passed. On roU cLU vote Yeta "aye", Pauly "aye", Strom "aye" and Nash "aye".
Motion carried.
4• The Council considered awarding bids for the Library aogsamion.
Architoet tawdry advised that six bids were received, ranging fray
$801,846 to $854 000. He indicated concern as to ~dathar the low bidder has the
e tens to buld a building such as the library, He maiaeded spading an
additional $21,000.
er is TTe Council discussed sAether second. low bid was legal. The next laat
bid' Mgler-Morris.
Attorney, Axsistrt City Manger Xing Cole req,wted a opinion fray the City
City Attotny C. J. Taylor advised that the bid could be awarded to the
lowest and most responsible bidder.
King
table the n Ie advised that bids are good for 30 days, so the Caakil could
Motion was tale by Stewart, mecardad by Nash to table the matter until
the neat oaring for more information. Motion carried.
S. CRDLYANCES:
f (A) The following Oediaace was presented for_„ sneered rsadings
diDMga NO. 80-11 {H. S. Osborm)
! AN C lXWC8 AV=W A IlAa OP M CaF a WS AND AAfACJ+Nr TO TTR CM OF DeMl
TWS; VJM ALL TINT Wr TRM'r OR PARCFJ, OP LAND CCMIMIM OF APPAMMOLMY
37.538 ACRES OF IAND L;U AND BEW SITU M 1H TTffi COO M OR DPM1?l STATE 01
TEW Arm UW IN THR t. J. FNAM 922 ABSTRACT N0. 900 MM &15R. TEXAS; I~
CLASWIFfM THd SAGE AS ALIWCUOLINAL "An DISTRICT PROPERTY{ U MaARRIIRT AN
MTIC WR CITE.
Motion was mode by Hensley, secodd by Stewett that the seco d reeding
be approved An roll call vote Vela 'aye", Stewart "eye", Hwally "aye" and Nath
"aye'', Haim carried.
(B) The following Ondtamce was pr"anted:
W W E NO. 80.29
AN ORDN4M OE THE C11Y OE DE' W, MkS R9 Dr, PA4 Dr, CN CFRTAV PORT 03 OF
CRESCE'R A%O PATOI ST'R17r1'S BMW TTE HIM OF 8:00 A.M. AND 4:00 PY., WMAY
v
I
April 1, 1990 Continued 395
TtflgJ131 FRIDAY: PRDNGTAQG FOR TX RMkL o? PARKING
M12 ON
C
° CRESC~11' MAYR,W: PRONML%G M TIC ROMAL OF P ARXM A'a AN
Y MI A CfATCER A4tTTOri
PMTla
FOR 11 ESi 1SW OF A F M ;MM S, TAM.
L`r1 ONLY p~ Gf AA PWMD4
~l~'Nl' OF A Fm .
Tow-Amw Alm IDQ ORpARj OF FMIM SI PIVNIDING Fdi CRESCENf AND
ND
'ID YF¢i1CLES PARI@IG CN 11 IM ~ CMM Prii1'rONS CN
FMTYN SMUTS; P.WMD:G AS~YswitITY aAUSF: MMDING
DMIARZE AN PMFMvE DM. PtNALT1ES; PPCYIDING REM noLIGTiONI~AI~
Motion was nude by Smart seconded by Ruh that the ordlneiee be
carried . On roll call vote Stewart ,aywl, Haulcv „syen Card Nash Motion
Camcil Member Vela did not vote. He was Called out for a few mimtes.
(C) The Council considered
adopting
of the cc~gr give :wing ordinance en ortliArtic g B
'Historic L 3k' Preservation", aeacinq a new Article 29A entitled
Mayor !lash gave citizens an
j ordinance. oP?orttinity to speak for or against the
Seven spoke in favor and five in Opposition.
l~ denigrated a h
Thme int In sition were concerned primarily that property eauu be
W a9 Wkimark without consent of the property cmW.
Omer for historical d~slr~uYLim be~delet~eed~ t relative to cmaeat by
Q would be the equivalent of spot toning. ' adding
that individlsal exceptions
Caakil ftber Stewart would
advised that he the after
hi:eelf Lhu~ "Ch Piece of ply be individualls y tdesi to
by
the a
lma hist
ty Coundl Property would be subject to the ordinenee. arial
The following ordinance wag presented:
ORDLsWa No. 90-50
UNIM DRDIIIANCB, oP " Cm op D 1Mt7r1 CTE OP Oy ADDIM , AP ~Cx~., rFW
CLLR 2211AIC MIMM ~~'ARTICL6 29A 1119 IC~LANDWS PgESF WATICf1DMgKM
T HISS X WWAX; ICA TIW A HISMC LAcMft CQ~4SSrQf Ahn PROVIDiMi Fort
sY 1t~ cm Ave estAarasHaa : PRflvmaeG sort nic r~rsra-uTrw of Hlsnnrc w+auRxs
DFSria*lArraes; ReGlL~raa Thni R~LA FDA use zN rn~I hasTtlRrc LANClNR1t
hffSfCRrGL L4tdelRlCgi D8FtN1NG TF93 'ppNQ~tS Dat7Lt770r1 ql R8~17VAL OAP
oorassra~ oven Hrsiauc uNCMARics A!O aF THe cmanr,~ni P~RavIDP A~ =ura+a
P~ C LAtm'.tARlf DESI(NATTOh~ SFW„L NOI' APFECC' PRISSPNi' 20NLVG USESi PRCYIDL*X) A %ts sed. Cn rolls call vote tl "Joy "m aStdewut5'a of that tmp y#
"
Notion carried S to 1, aye , Vela „
T2W Caaxil cans~dmd financing for the
MO Railroad
lraeks to I.352.g of loop 298 !ra• the Board
the Board 8PProvsd by A vote of 3 t ft to tronOf the sffor 13001000stt= the EleecctrictSystem Fu d~
' to
rate the St eewers tisuac t Fund, but there wag concern with the appearax@ that
Utilities finds, aeU end that there would be Rrtrav dipping into
LJ
Rick Svehia stated that the City had received the uerm armoont from
the Ki DeQat~nt. The mraney needy t• be put up for widening of 298 will bo
APP irbe7s409j00i0o, In order to meet otate reluit mtts, oil present Cancil
also reauira the Caurod to sign the uerow agreement, DeDereawnt
Caaneil'to to the escrow pass a resolution authorizing Call merbera of the At Nobef decided to take the staffs reccowwwZat~tiai tto usieaA the
ffrontsSo amt a cchtide of
it at Ne3Carxil coma ri ~foot. The Staff still recomknds this proposal and
suggest that the Council follow the following orocyure:
(A) Pass the resolution outhorizinq the sipring of the escrow
agreement Card haw All members sign,
3QC
April 1, 1980 Continued
(B) Iasnvct the Staff to hold escrow agreement until a check cad
an agreement free Melvin Simon is received far any expense
over $300,000.
(C) Once the escrow Agreement and related contract and dnacks have
bb en completed, Caauil adopt an assessment ordinance assessing
side, of Loop 288 at 810.00 per front fact.
Finance Director Bill DtXary advised that because of the
widening late and the e:arent uncertainties of the axaci al tx
most .pp on edinr the eta agenda method
ieof a Amdiag th resolution ►d~i is protect is through internal financing the
Included t~
ftt4
the
Electric System Fund to the Street Improvementprovides Fvmd
to the loamount of an 0= o o of of Asnds 1300,000.
000.
'Boise fleds represent excess cash generated frog the!n for
System
Bads is 1970, There is ao pprraVMNd,requtraaymt for these within the next $
Years. This resolution oravides for repsymwt of the cash advance through
bade Of ft tuatircnreabsrla ales ttaaxIrIVINn genera ed this loan Ma 1. fThe loci
these fords is not art . tee to the ElectricgSy~steeeltse lf a
. blit will loe► of
an export to the General Fu d over a i year period, r s ht
oserow T The following Resolution authorising the signaujres and the
signing of t A)'
aM"ant with the State wets presented:
1
R-ESOLUTION
w+FO "Mo the City of Denton desire to widen Loop
to U.S. rnterstste SSRJ tad 288 from the MT Railroad Ovenpnsa
*MM, the State of Testa, acting through its state Highiow ed Palle
Tr
ensportat.
Cosdasiasn, her aUvad to WticlYsts with the City of Denton on this project;
and
t *ERFA3, the State of Tau require that all
axeeuta an ascm agra,aset with the State for Its of the City of Denton
participation; 'j
NOM, 1MUMPOM BE IT RMVED BY THE CTIY mLML CP IM aw W MM, TEXAS, J
THAT:
SECTION 1.
It is the intent of the City CQ1JOd1 of the City of Nation Tart to participate
with the State Of To= in wddaning Loop 288 ilia the Nlq't4ailroso :verpYS to
Uor.~S~. ~ Interstate $SE, and all Ceuncilparsona are hereby rasthorited to eacaeuto
achi of the attached Escrow AgroAunt required by tea State of Tao" to
{ on this Purpose.
SBCT[0N Tr. ~
That this Aem1ut10a shall take effect Immediately Orus and after its passage and
approvgl I
PASSED AM APPROVED this the tst day of April, logo.
AT SP: C11Y OF DL<AR+QJ, TVA
y~
WWAJ1WF
CM OF DEary'Q1, Taus
AWED AS TO LWAL FM-
C.
CCrry of CM, CITY ATTCR?OIY
TMLIg
BY: [s/,
Notion was We by Stewart, seconded by vela that the lesolution be
passed. On roll all veto Horsley "aye vela "aye", Stewart ,aye" ad !lain
cion carried.
April 1, 1980 Continued 98
(B) The following Resolution a:thoriting the financing for the
widening of Loop 288 was presented:
R830LUT10.4
M IT RfSOLVM EY W CITY C32 CL OF THE CITY CE' De;m, TEXAS, TfWT:
SBMON 1.
n erpass
The oroject V. S. Intersathe te SS SEE iof Denton to widen icop s hereby approved for the B Street the Aallrca Ov
to Iaprov ravmsni Raid.
WICN 11.
The Clty ,onager is authorized to transfer the sum of $300,000 from the Electric
Synom Find to the Sreet Ingtavmmat Rand as it cash advanu to be repaid from
General Revenues wen a five (3) year period at an interest rate of tea percent
(101).
PASSED AND APPROVED this the L t day of April, 1980.
M
Kim, R
V HTY MTmm
W ATTEST.
a
a /mar. CITY
CITY C!' mmm, TvA4
APP9DV® AS TO LEG4L FCAlf:
C. J. TAYL(R, JR., CRY ATTCRNEY
CITY OF D&M, TEXAS
I r-~ BYE /s/
Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by Vila that the Resolution be
paued. 04 roll Call vote Manly "sys", Volt "aye', Stowitt 11"I am Nash
MDtiom carried.
1. The Conn:il considerd a contract with the Denton Girls Softball Assoc-
Istion for umpire services for all Girls' Y*Ah League softball gazes.
Motion was made by Plumley, seconded W Vela t a eontrset for
services with the Denton Softball Association. Motion
4. The Camcil amideved the final plat of Skyline Additien.
Mayor Nash relinquisbd the chair to Council Member Stowase sines he
was Involved in the project.
It was ported cut by Kendolph residents that 13 sip,aanxes and maermw
letters indicated opposition to the plat.
J Motion was made by HMO seconded by VeL to deny the petition as
recaaatendad by the planning and i Cowmlasion. Motion Carried.
9. The Council considered final payment to LM Consultants for Aubrey
Reservoir Financial Feasibility Studs.
Utilities Director Bob Nelson advised that in early Septed*r, 1979, the
cities of Denton ed Dallas retained the WV14es of LNFN, Lee., Covenants to
perform a financial feasibility "t of Aubrey Womir. The iturfy has boos
completed to the satisfaction of both cities and LinFM, Inc. hu submitted a r"xst
for final payr t. Tha Utilities board, at their of Mereh 11, 1980
recommended that final paymimt to LXPW, Inc., ba meetin In elm aasnmt of 111,42:.44
of which Dwtan's flare will be 51,989.83. .
Motion was made by Nash seco led by Hensley to approve final payment to
L6'F1f. Inc., in the mu mt of l:, 919.13. *tlom carried.
"
_ all
3 a 4 April 1, 1880 Continued
10. The C=v-il considered final payment to Claude Smith Construction Company
for ovenidth paving on Kings Raw.
Rick Svehla advised that Chide Smith Paving and Excavating has caiplated
its construction of Kings Row adjacent to Kingston Trace, Sections I, IT, and III.
the City of Demon's cost is based as the cost of all Irpmvemants in front of the
electrical substation and the cost for axtra Width and extra depth of asphalt on
the remainder of zings Row, ad that $19,156.19 is available fran the Street Depart-
went to cover the sxpense.
Motion was made by Nash, seconded by Heasley to approve payment of S19 ,1S6
to Chide Smith Paving and Excavating. Motion tarried.
11. The Cotmil considered participation In 16" oversize water lines along
I.33N.
Motion was made by Nash, seconded by Vela to participate In 16" oversits
water lines along I.SSW. Motion carried.
12. The Cameil set the April g, L'80 study sessica.
13. Cm9sw AGM
Motion was rode by Stem 9 seaadad by V91A to epprow the following
Comet Agonda with lid 18146, Pick" and Vane, reroved. Motion carried.
BIDS/Pt1RC1iAS8 MEM
(1) Aachue Order 142187, own repairs to rig 19936, approved
to parr smiprent Company in the W"t of $4, 29. 6.
(3) FLATS
(1) Final r"Ut of Owslfy Park Witt= approved.
(2) Final MIat of Snhaita and Aipy Additiaa atprav+d,
i
14. The Couicil considered awarding of lid 181480 Pick" and VMS:
Assistant Purchasing Agent Tor Shaw Outlined the rathod of biddtag,
Notion was made by Vela, seconded by Stephens to award the bid ae falloda
l Item 1 to the law bid,ier, Menton Datsut At (10,660
,G 8 7 to the low bidder, Bsmw Choevrolet at a
Items 2,4'S
total of 189,792,03
Ito 3 to the I~ evaluated bidder, &nw 00MIet it 16,903,42
Motion tumid 3 to 2.
13. Pan Ten Stephens It" a brief report on the MYahiaaton trip. HL
stated thatntwu imgrased with the Trinitr Ipmvsmant Associat m and with
the attitude that seers to prevail it will be a good year for ~nmoir.
Stephens added that Any Roberti) stated that Aubrey would get t~ Confe"nce
Caerittee at about 7 million dollars. "It wan a profitable trip f0i Denton, we
presattd s ptonlsmtion to Any Roberta ;moclaiainr 'Any Aob~rrta Day In Dattat'.
A key to the City was Lisa presented," Stepiem sadid.
16. The Cameii recessed into Pxecutive Session at 9130 P.M. to diactias
legal matters, reel estate, personnel end board appointments.
17. The Council reconvened into public Session at 10:04 p.a.
Motion was made by Vels, seconded by Stewart to :,yoiat the following
citizens to the Study Cosnittse an Radioactive Materials:
Leland Peyton bar Hgt. Specialist, WA
Alex Rinlsy ND...Aidiole it
Dr. Sidmy ida....Podia t, Fx-Radiation Control Officer N.Y.
i
1
April 1, 1990 Continued
bannla ~k'Am......Psdiaticn Safety Officer N13fed, Inc.
Dtrid Arsw.........Aetlred Lt/Col USAF. Mean Neepons
..Protasor•lMi•Asdiltloa C7~eml~try
Fowud B• ~eEyyrdoe:t•••Proteaaor•'fl~U-8loloRY/lVdiatiat llolotlst
Jaseyh Gaatil~... , . rASUWttOr MMMMtLailai View JTi~l ge EcwM es av
4otica carried.
Meeting edImaned at 10: to p.et.
mum
t~
M
W
Q e e e
i
j
l
V
i
1
I
Lill
1 I
? i
i
}
City Casxil
April 0, 1980
Special Called Heating ofreil Chambethe CityrCo of uncil the 'ofWtheeipal City Buioflding.
April 8, lgeo In the Co:O
Denton, Texas, rwsday,
'jT: `mty NW, Mgvr Pro Tao Stephens, vobas Vela, Stewart and Hensley;
Brooks iger Chris HartUng. City Attorney C. J. Taylor and City Sea'etary
1• The Camcil Considered adoptin en ordinance emnVaaming
declaring the results of the April 5, the returns and
190 City Caancil MIe Lion.
City Attorney C. J. Taylor advised that newly elected persons emot be
is s th the in possi until t'ebilityo Jusaffticeine i Depfastmmt advise that there is no objection There
,b do not abet requiranents. J
The following Ordinance was presented:
CRDOWWO NO. 10-31
AN OID003 CAWASSLYO M "IMMS AND MCIAkM TTie RE MTS OF T4@ 1tMODW
R U-WF Fl•M 01 TO B2 HELD (N APRIL 29, ; PPXMDVC pM EIB CTTON OF ONDCN CFA SPECIAL
VM• M PLACES AM EUMON SDPPLIPS AND BQkiImm. FICIALS,
Motion was arde by Vela, seconded by fwjl that the Ordinance De
an roll h '"call verb stow" "aye", Hensley "aye", Vou '".0 stopbens „ ,
Nas
Motion Carrie& aye
L. O. Nelton,~loeal cltltan, spoke m various commLity issues such as
pollceloose
cure am'stoacdtkefiraCitysq sandsa parlaicirlrng se,m tie n Mmiae Dlan season is near, dop should not
and Crescent.
S. The Council considered a presentation Ben
increase for Denton Cab C=pW. by wY reLtiw to a nu
!m Ivey of Denton Cab Coepanv advised that Denton Cab Cosgeny is
currently operating reader an motiquated rate structure and rate COMK"tlon
Existing rates haw been in effect since April, 1974. it MtMd •
4 an the City of Denton, Clna 1972, ti~ Rate ~s rat is based
i~ncroma following all Phu" of this operation heim mat ed in cut rate m set
awing Cost based formda instituting the installation of tax~imors
msc)mdtally set at tiefodfopllowing rata:
61.10 each incinding the firn 1/ION Odle
additional 1/lON pile
i C ! SO esutha etAc00 plws enger 00
t (f°s,°~~.emre desttaatlm)
t
~ t S .20 etch 14 mimase wai~ thus and traffic delay
The pcnpose of the Proposed rate is to not mly place this operation an a sated
e eeanodc basis, but in so doing, to give our eititons the beet possible service
at affordable prices.
Council !W&. Stewart asked about vehicles.
modal, all wiithehishaiel agie, rin0 tour 1971 model theeker coos and Sep 1971
j MotimmWI~ by Vela, Seconded by Hensley to instruct the City Attorney
o are an ordinance for a tau [ncreaee for the Dentin Cab CoaQSay.
Mtoeiai tarried.
2. The following Ordinsms treating a Joint City/County Airport Height
awing Board and appointing two City representatives was presented:
Gi01?WkfF No. 00.12
AN COIDIMA O OF =fte CITY OF Dk?iM ChP.VT1AMl A JOINT AIRPORT 1CN11i0 XW TO IM
CkDld+ AS TNM'T ENTM CITY-COI M MINT AIRPM UNDO BWV' AND VAIM H0 Si10T
JOW WARD WITH THE PCWM 9XH XMW ARM .4 MIp ZwM TO EXF3lCIS2 WO TM
PAOVISICNS DP CFAPM 191 CF M ACTS M TIM! UaW SESSICN DF TWI SOTH =IS-
fATT)HE, 191?.
i
I
April 1, 1990 Continued 401
Motion was merle by Stephms, seconded by Vala that the ordinance be
passed. On roll call vote Hensley "aye", Vela "eve", Stewart 11"P, Stephens "aye"
and Nash "aye". Motion carried.
S. The Council considered accepting a grant from the Department of En*W
for a Resource Recovery project.
City Manager Chris Nirttmg rom4nded the Cm=il that the Front is to
finance a study on the feasibility of wing solid waste as a fuel at Acme grids.
Council -Mmobor Stewart said, "t was the first one to bring this matter
before the Council".
Motion was =do by Stewart, recorded by Stephens to approve a groat
from the Department of energy for a Resource Rocavory Project. Motion carried.
6. The Comndl considered a charge order to the contract with J"
Constrx:tim Company for the Windsor Drive Improvement Project.
Rick Svehia Avlsed that during construction of this project, it was
observed that then is a drainage problem on the axis" portion of Windsor Drive
Ly)
~irt
Stutatpoad and tWlindsor Drive. After gutter w wiilln m
porA water' of
from a point q rondmately 60. out of the intersection to a point aVrocintelr
s Q by S13ou0.of the Intersection. This work will increase the c mt of the contract
Q Motion was made by Vela, socmdd by Stewart to approve change order in
the increased amount of gVrmdnatsly SS,000. !Motion carried.
j ~rvvemett~ Council considered awarding lid I0749 for water and sewer line
Utilities Director Bob Nelson advised that the low bids per section
tooled $144,105.40 which is $22,150.40 h1 that the Dickerson bid. The
Dickerson bids way excluded from the tow bid by section detersdmtlon as
l the Dickerson eaditicn to accept all the, projects. With the addition of 11,600
u the rt~abccaavations Detarem's bid will total 1143,S75, which is 1330.40 below
be be prepoand work b routed to the th uDic]rerson Canssruetneda rhtt a of Colin for all
Y, of Cellos, Two,
in the argot of $143,675.
Dickerson Gaon was C company Stepbens, leeanded by Vela to Bard bid 16749 to
ampany in the amamt of $2247,575. Motion amid.
' B. Cr]4Si94T AGMI
Hr/or Nuh
remand frm the Consent AFadathat the fiscal »plat of Phillips Addition be
Hatton was Saida Steple~~ seconded by Yale. that the following Convent
l gibe approved with theefinal repiat of the Phillips Addition moved. Motion
(A) PL1PSr
(1) Final rrplat of Oak Meadows Addition approved. {
r 9. Motion wu made by Stewart, seconded by Nanslay that the final replat
of the Phillips addition be epprovod. Motion carried.
10. The Council recessed into Bxecutivt Session to discus legal tatters,
real estate, persormnel and board appointments at 7:55 p.m.
11. The Council reconvened into public session to consider board appointments
at 1.23 P.M.
i
402 April 8, 1980 Continued
Motion was made by Vela, seconded by Hensley tit the following appoint.
meats be made:
Historitsl Landmark Commission.....-Contact Psrson-John Lavratts
8nllitt Larry
ran 4iller
Randy Boyd
Dorothy Bartind
Bob Powers
DoMtharyina
Williams
Robert Pearce
DataProcessina Advisory 8oatd......Contact Person Ring "ale
Ray Pittman appointed to raolace James Earp
Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
MkYCFt
j
1
1
~ ~ a a e
i
I
i
l •
I
' i
r
Planning and Zoning Conmission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1441
April 15, 1980
Identity and Location: Z-1441
This is the petition of Ms. Karen Nash requesting an amendment to a planned
development (PD). The original planned development was for zero lot line,
detached single family housing on 45 foot X 100 foot lots. The amendment
would permit multi family restricted (MF-R) development on a 7 acre tract
located north of the proposed Windsor Drive and approximately 125 feet west
of Stuart Road.
Back9rou
In October, 1978 the City Council approved planned development (PD) zoning
permitting zero lot line, single family detached homes on 4,500 square foot
lots on 18 acres in two tracts. The first tract is approximately 11 acres
in size and is located west of Stuart and south of the proposed Windsor Drive
extension. The second tract (the tract in this request} is approximately 7
acres in size and is located to the north of the proposed Windsor extension.
i
Another planned development adjoins the site in this request on the south
and west, This Planned Development permits some zero lot line development
along the western frontage of Stuart Road as well as multi family dwe111nc~s
on the north side of the projected extension of Windsor Drive approximately
450 feet west of Stuart Road on a 5.8 acre tract with a maximum density of
100 units. Land east of the multi family site is designated for recreational
activities and land for a greenbelt is reserved east of the recreational area.
Public facilities are available for extension to the site and there is
adequate capacity in the lines.
The planned deW opmont in this request is part of an integrated residential
development. The high intensity multi family uses are small in scale in
relation to the overall development and there was a good transition between
uses. The underlying philosophy of the overall development was to locate
~J the higher density uses on the Interior with access to the Windsor extension
and with zero lot line development, a greenbelt and single family development
forming a transition to existing residential areas. The Planning Commission
felt that the proposed amendment undermines this philosophy by significantly
expending the high density development and in essence eliminating any transition
into existing and future lower density residential uses on the surrounding
property. For this reason the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously
recommends denial of Z-1441.
.
nkSIQLAAL-L
SF-7
FTFi7ZEL
z-1441------~
PD-24
l
M F- I
/
OOR
M ~
' y
.
PRCPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Universal Development
Grant Jacobson
212 W. Sycamore
Denton, Texas 16201
j ,
i
r
}
'(1
11
I
1
I
I
s
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Case. No. Z-1441
The Denton City Council would like to receive your co=ants on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and
return it to the following address by the data of the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return a
repl form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/3) vote to approve, it. If you submitted a repIr
fords for consideration by than Planning and Zoning Commission, host op►-
manes are a sufficient response and will be presented to the C~L7 Comcil
If your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this ford to notify us concerning your position.
If rou have que t one pertaining to the take, please call the Planning
Off ca at 566-a S
.
Plea a use SLACK ink only, C ,
siba blue ink cannot be, xeroxed.
&1iPLY .god •
r. as in favor of this zoning request. ? 'bo
( } I am opposld to this zoning request.
( ) I in undecided about this zoning request,
My comments are as lolloaa, / nrt,r ejee-3 e=! ,x o
r-~••••~~~~r +w+..rr.rYr~Ml+rYr
(n-e- TSB cur ,,try
Y..Y1rY.1~Y.Y i
YYY.YY.Y-.YIY-YYI
N~f f v
5ignattitre "A wry---
Addl~6
Phone 7
__J
a -
i
v1rS~l~q
i
k ill Gi.e± esi~yr r...
i• r~
i
.JU
-T_.~..GdY•~~..._.__
! 9 t
l
f ! iI
h I
i
j
i
y
7
' i
r
f+Y#
rJ3 &Aiy
fir. RJ■■■
walk
~J
J
-v
i
f
A
y
{I
go,
I~
I
I
Al u
d
I,
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
I ~
1
i
004 I/ A
I
It
E
f
tJ.F'
f~
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March S. ]980
This is the regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission held
on March 5, 1980 at 5:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Bill Brady, Marilyn Gilchrist, Robert Laforte, Linnie McAdams,
Carolyn Busby, Andy Stdor, and Richard Taltaferro. Staff members
were John Lavretta, Charles Watkins, Rick Svehia, and Sue Wigand,
ABSENT: None.
1. Approve the minutes of the February 20, 1980 meeting.
Motion was made by Taltaferro and seconded by La Forte to approve the
minutes. Motion: carried unanimously.
II. Consideration:
A. Z-1436, This is the petition of Mr. Jack Brown and of Mr. Neil
Hill, general partner, Duncan Properties Ltd., requesting Planned
Development (PD) zoning classification for development of a shopping
center complex, office and warehouse complex, and mini-warehouse
complex on a tract approximately 32 acres in site.
Roger Shipman, attorney for Brown and Hill, spoke in favor of the
request.
David Wilson, representing the Henry S. Miller Co., spoke in
opposition to the request, stating that there was still a dispute
I over a strip of land and the court would decide upon the ownership,
Mr. Wilson also objected to the curb cut.
E
City Engineer, Rick Svehla, stated that he did not feel it was fair
to hold up Duncan Properties since the Miller Co. has not submitted
a plat to the Planning Department.
Mr. Nett Hill spoke In rebuttal.
The Commission discussed the case.
Motion was made by Taltaferro and seconded by Stdor to appprove Z-1436 ~I
with conditions as written. Approved by a vote of 6 to 1.
111. A. Z-1408. This is the petition of the Planning and Zoning Commission
requesting Light Industrial (LI) toning classification on a tract approxi-
mately 314.9 acres In size. The property is located on the north side
of Highway 11, ad acent and east of Bonnie Brae Road, This tract has
approximately 4,44 feet of frontage along Highway 11 extending westward
from the Riney Road - Highway 11 intersection and is contiguous with the
city limits approximately in tCe centerline of Riney Road, (This property
is owned by Texas Instruments,,
h Aq
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 5, 1980
Page 2
John Lavretta spoke, on behalf of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
In favor of the request,
No one spoke in opposition.
Motion was made by 8111 Brady and seconded by Andy Sidor-to approve Z-1408.
Motion carried unanimously.
B. Z-1441. This is the petition of Ms. Karen Nash requesting an Devel one45' X!100 a lotsnto fmentamionly house
tracts
approximately 7 acres in size. The tract is located on the north side
of the proposed Windsor extension, and approximately 125 feet west of
Stuart Road.
Karen Nash spoke in favor of the request.
No one spoke in opposition.
John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation.
I
No one spoke in rebuttal.
The Commission discussed the case.
Motion was made by Sidor and seconded by Tsliaferro to deny Z-1441.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. Z-1442, This is the petition of Mr. Charles Olasgow requesting
a char of zoning from Agricultural (A) to Commercial (C) toning
classification on a parcel approximately 26.4 acres in size which begins
at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and Audra Lane. The properly has
approximately 909 feet of frontage along the west side of Loop 288 and
approximately 1030.9 feet of frontage along the south side of Audra Ln.
Charles Glasgow, petitioner, spoke in favor of the request.
Frank Cawthon, realtor, spoke in favor of the request.
Leonard Morris, representing the owner of the property zoned SF-10
across Loop 288, spoke in favor of the request.
Robin Butt, 1807 Audra Lana, spoke in opposition to the request.
T. Holland spoke in opposition to the request,
John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation. {
Charles Glasgow spoke In rebuttal.
The Commission discussed the case with Charles Glasgow, stating the
toning change request would be more desireable if the proposed Conmerciali
development included only the frontage along Loop 288.1 also it
Sl
I'
w~
Minutes
Planning and Zoring Commission
March 5, 1980
Page 3
would be desireable if a transition, such as multi family, was provided
between the proposed single family area to the west and the proposed
commercial development along Loop 288.
Motion was made by Fidor and seconded by Taliaferro to deny Z-1442.
Motion carried S to 1 with 1 abstention.
1V. Considerations:
A. Consider the final plat of Skyline Addition.
Ross Milton spoke in favor of the plat.
Motion was made by La Forte and seconded by Gilchrist to approve the
final plat of the Skyline Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
1 B. Consider the final plat of Solar Way Addition,
i Charles Watkins stated the staff recommended approval.
Motion was made by Tallaferro and seconded by Gilchrist to approve
the final plat of Solar Way Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Consider the preliminary plat of Plaza 288 Addition.
This plat was withdrawn by Charles Glasgow,
D. Consider the final replat pf Ruddell Addition.
I~ Charles Watkins gave the staff recommendation of approval.
Motion was made by La Forte and seconded by Andy Sidor to approve
the final replat of Ruddell Addition, Motion carried unanimously,
E. Consider the preliminary plat of Wimbleton Village Phase Two.
Charles Watkins stated that 2 additional valves and electrical easements
are needed and recommended approval contingent upon this condition.
Motion was made by Sidor And seconded by Busby to approve the preliminary
plat of Wimbleton Village Phase Two with the condition, Motion approved
unanimously.
F. Consider disposition of lot 2A, block 3, Heritage Oaks Addition.
John lavretta reported that the Parks and Recreation Department desires
to keep the land.
Motion was made b Sidor and seconded by Carol to recommend that the
Cityr keep the land. Motion carried unanimously.
Qt~
V'' Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 5, 1980
Page 4
G. Consider disposition of excess city property at 517 E. Prairie Street,
John tavretta recommended disposition.
Motion was made by Taliaferro and seconded by Gilchrist to recommend
that the Council dispose of.the property. Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
i
1
t
3
a
w6WC6ay
` R
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1443
April 15, 1980
Identity and Location: Z-1443
This is the petition of Mr. Charles P. Mulkey requesting a change of zoning from
single family (SF-7) to general retail (GR) zoning classification on a 1/2 acre
tract located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Cleveland Street and
i Eagle Drive and extends eastward along the south side of Eagle Drive for a distance
of approximately 230 feet.
Report:
Single family housing is located on the tract in this request. Surrounding land
use includes single family housing located along the east side of Cleveland Streeli'~">
An apartment building is under construction at the southwest corner of Eagle and
Cleveland with single family housing on the west side of Cleveland Street south
of the a rtmeat under construction. A cemetary is north of Eagle Drive$ and
Carroll Blvd, is east of the site. In addition, a zoning district boundary line
runs down Cleveland Street between Eagle Drive and Collins Street, The property
west of Cleveland is zoned multi family (MF-1) classification and the property
j east of Cleveland is zoned single family (SF-7} classification.
Public facilities are available at the site and there is adequate capacity in
the lines.
The Planning Commission considered the fact that the proposed retail zone would
adjoin some of the houses on Cleveland Street. The Commission felt that a
retail use would have limited impact on this neighborhood because it was at the
end of the street, They also felt that land use changes in the area were
inevitable because of the proximity of the Eagle Drive • Carroll Boulevard
Intersection. Only one resident of Cleveland Street spoke in opposition to the
request.
The site in this request is only 75 feet from Carroll Boulevard. The Commission
considered the effect of the request on the long standing policy of discouraging
strip retail development on Carroll Boulevard, it was their feeling that
approval of this case did not necessarily set a precedent for the large vacant
tract fronting on the west side of Carroll Boulevard and that future requests
for retail zoning could be considered on their own merits.
The Plann nQQ and Zoning Commission recommended eppro~al of the request by a 4 to
2 vote, The Planning stiff had recommended den al,
, ~r ~;I ~ YX v,• ~ t-:
N+ ~ E. r 1i~ N~•.
s
a. 4MAPl FAX,! Y,
-4s 01 J
f)r• # + t ~ iii. # iL wx ~ n ~:r ilil \ '~'t`\,Sffr." ~u +
~ j7i ~ i,f. E ~y irtS`•E. ~r.1E~ d J r r~. .fl+y. k~.~~~~~9 a
11 1 Ilk
ryi■ It r'~r 'llAi-r ~'4 .ars4 ~X
R e r yw ^f'k°7tlF'if9i ~aT~
L (E I
EAGLE DRIVE
!Gwww K 1' ~ '~'1 f ~ •
d a `
Ott
r fr.. R i. 79I C y r:M ,5.n. k rort::~
"R371's~ ~a`1 t~1 r' ~l
nwrvr m•Y y j.jS.Y " .(ri•Y3', A' y, 4f 'Age, K'dE•+ ,j OP a ,
t. 1 ~ ~ ~ r 5~tl i ~ 1- lr,, P ..r y~Yh S t , •t.~ /
~nS ~Y w a ~ ~~r it a }p A lF E, ' iiyb~. ~i~
n.
+
r r . f Y « r'
.l w#Ir'. m 1 A f 1011 r ~V v (I~.YVa 61
~ r Y~ yy 1 jy d
•\.l 'F~ Psi E~°~~'1 air, ~i~'3` l~ r "t~i ~~'•i!~ ~ r'tT4/9
a r 'r Y " , i ~°i} 7TT { ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ! 1 i V of
At
v r t
~
' «i r' ~ t $ t b e ~4t t ri rr. !}rt y°.w y A r - ~S~ A 1 • ~ A
40
r r (i 1 1; i !~1 r llr 'r r~ 5',i~r4`14 '.j,y+~ i V,•.
i''~' t , f k~~~~~[ artt4. r ,~v 0~' y SPX rlV
ei /ErKi' r d~ r"t1 •yt ]a
' t ° ~ Y r . 111 • r .~~,i[ .`~i w.~r ~ ~'Z l
, ' N r f t L
r 40L'" A ,r
4s
~4rg^~ir ] A~;~rr r ]7~ a rr.; ~F k~ r`a
Iw,,w/'E ,.~{a.,-t1 'Yi~y :.}vr ry
i
9••~~1111 f i^` 11•i. p t ~Y"lr:
• u i 1 . .:,i, E ixV e r,,,tl ^o
L !.r , i,l't rl] i. 'r Y~ Z1 lnr f" self Rt,,} 4
Iv 7 °K
6 ♦r n~ ' e.~ ..t y ,a~ 1
t
.f Y+ A•if 1 .Mz t 1 x 'r y
L 4 7ET `~FJ!~
~ • ~~rr yr y p X' ~ • 1r 1.. araY err ~r+ 1 lol
r
s.
r r~tr~ '
....bier. _ ,~~w_~~i •..2y` ~'Lw~::_-... .#.s•YS~D_.x ~ ♦
r ....r .,,,e- ..~•.•rr........:.u ' iii
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
Z-1443
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Mrs. G. E, Stockard Thelma Compton Winton Mrs. James Lockridge
P.O. Box 685 919 Cleveland 917 Cleveland St.
Denton, Tx 76201 Denton, Tx 76201 Denton, Tx 76201
Dale Irwin
Box 1250
Denton, Tx 76201
i
1
II
I
I
I
REPLY FOR THE 'PLANNING AND ZONING COHMI53ION
Case No. Z-1443
1
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
ease in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you desire.to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
I
City Planner
Municipal Building
213 East MaKiaaa
y
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no vay affects )tur rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if
they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notiee
return this reply farm in opposition to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifth: (6/5) ante to approve it.
If you have questions pertaining to the Casa, please call tha Planning
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only.
z:dPL~ RECEIVED HRR' 12, 1980
(f) I em in favor of this coning request.
! E ( ) I am opposed to this conin request.
f ( ) I = undecided about this toning request,
my comments are as follows.
I
signature r ~Yw+
Address _ t, D I~.enG G+
I
I
4
AR)M
rr.•r
r ~~ue ti+j .iv '!..IYLi
r
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Case No. Z-1443
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you deli:*. to express an opinion, please complete
this reply forma and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East HWUnney
-Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects yatr rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if
they wish, If 20% or-more of-the pr ft bwn~rs Jeadeivimig this notice
Council m~maasteatitiin a four- pfifthsi(4/5) votep to app change, the City
If you have questions pertaining to the "*At please call the Ilaaainr
Office at 3668350.
Pisase use BLACK ink only.
' any RECEIVED MAR ~ 2 00
I
(X) I =in favor of this zoning request,
( ) I an opposed to this zoning'request.
.
I aaa vadecided about this zoning request.
My comments art as follows i ,
I '
Signature
Address
i
I
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Case No. Z-1443
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the Ci~y Council. If you desire-to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Tsxas 76201
This reply form in na way affects•your rights to attend the public hear-
we encourage all fatarcatad parties to attend and comment if
they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in osition.to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifth* (4/5) vote to ap1mve it.
3s p~~I to the case". please call the planing;
iffius heat 566-830.
Please use BLACK ink only.
REPLY
( ) I an in favor of this zoning request.
~oy~a /
~
( ) I am opposed to this zoniag'raquest.
I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows..
Signature gar}It 7rSr 9~
Address
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Case No. 2-1443
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the CityCouncil.
it i to the folloowing address,bylthe date ofte
form l and Ireyturndesire
this the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if
they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice
voteprtoopae change, the City
return this reply form in opposition to
Council must attain a four-fifths ( approve
If you have questions pertaining to the casi, please call the Planning
Office at 366-6350.
Please use BLACK ink only.
I
a REPLY RECEIVED MAR 1 31980
( ) I am in favor of this zoning request.
(fit) I ass opposed to this zoning request.
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows:•;l~G~,T~' 15& Alk-A
j
l iM l w.a_~ 9& aykj1 IL
At~
14 - J-4 ~ ~-/'Cg:~.A `~'V7~~~1 I I'L~JI I} 4Ji~ I
/ r ~i+►L~Li yd
1
r I
1
a.~•j ~e♦ ~ d"'s$iguatu:ra N ^ R
Address I r4 (•/!.L• mi, _ 9j.,
F +
v
1
4 ♦p.
i
I
i
r i2~ = i :r
- )V43
/ M
2 Vol 9t, If i e
• f~
7~1 AAA
If, p ~/i re q. Erwiw
to lap,
9 A.4'
i
N
14 401,
j
f. A~.JAA OjIf JA
r
Jv.
11
fit
f
' •V . 1
AP ASS'
s r ~r
i
E ■
pie=
I
I ~
I ~
I
1
N
too
11 it
I! LL I
I ~ ~ 1
l
C
1
.
„
It
a 1•
fi
1
}
1
r
. i
a
4
Planning and Zoning Connission Recommendation
to the City Council
2-1445
April 15, 1980
Identity and Location: Z-1445
This is the petition of Mr. Robert Nickerson requesting an amendment to a planned
development (PD). The planned development (PD) begins at the southeast corner
of the intersection of State School Road and Interstate 35E. The original planned
development permitted commercial, shopping, and two story garden apartment uses.
The amendment proposes office, multi family, restaurant, theatre, retail
shopping, hotel, and recreational uses on approximately 90 acres of land.
Background:
The overall development includes roughly 350 acres, approximately half of the
development is inside Denton with the remainder in Corinth. Planned development
(PD) zoning on approximately 145 acres was approved In 1972 permitting commercial,
retail shopping, and two story garden apartments on a tract roughly 90 acres in
size. The remainder of the land inside Denton, which is not included in this
reques% was originally designated for townhouses and or cluster homes and was..
modified in June, 1979,to permit single famil/ (SF-7S and multi family uses.
AdJacent Land Uses:
Surrounding land use Includes a single family development on the west side of
State School Road near its intersection with Interstate 35E, with the State School
located further to the south. Vacant land is to the south of the site and is
part of the land included in the overall development, and 1-35E forms a barrier
to the north.
Comparison of Original (PD) and Proposal:
The planned development as approved in 1972 for the site In this request was
as follows:
Tract Acreage" Use Density,
1 18.5 Commerciale Unspecified
2 24.3 Two-Story 18 Units/Acre
Apartments
3 7.0 Commercial Unspecified
4 10.6 Shopping Unspecified
5 22.8 Two-Story 18 Units /Acre {
Apartments
*Acreage is approximate
The proposal for amendment of the planned development was submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Commission as follows:
a
r
2
Tract Acreage Use Density
1 17.4 Office 385,000 square feet GFA
2 *18.1 Multi Family 20 Units/Acre
3 *3 Restaurant 100 Seats
4 4.6 Cultural (Triple Theatres) 850 Seats
5 5.5 Retail Shopping 80,000 square feet GFA
6 10.1 Hotel, Restaurant - Lounge 400 Rooms, 200 Seats
7 10.9 Office 231,000 square feet GFA
8 20.6 Recreatioaal Area
*Acreage is approximate '
` The original (PD) and the proposed ameodeent are difficult to correlate in that
f the old (PD) is generalized whereas the new proposal is quite specific, however
it is felt that they are essentially eq,iivalent in terms of intensity of use.
Traffic:
There is a memo in the packet to the Planning Commission from the City Engineer
concerning the traffic impact of the development. Basically, the developer's
engineer and the City Engineer feel that it is imperative that State School
Road be widened to four lanes from Wimbleton Boulevard to 1-35. This widening
would be accomplished by the developers at the point at which traffic load
required the improvement. Even with this improvement to State School Road the
development proposed,including the area in Corinth, will utilize nearly all of
the remaining traffic capacity in State School Road. The Planning Commisslon
felt that it was important that there be capacity reserved for future development.
The developer agreed to limit the development sufficiently to reserve 5,000 trips
per day as follows:
1 Office - maximum of 285,000 square feet
2 Apartments - maximum of 270 units
3 Restaurant - maximum of 100 seats
4 Cultural - ma.cimum of 675 seats for theatres
5 Hotel - maximum of 300 roams and 200 seat restaurant
6 Office (site two) - maximum of 181,000 square feet
7 Village Shopping - maximum of 80,000 square feet
These reductions principally in the office and hotel size will reduce the traffic
generated by the development by approximately $,000 trips per day.
Desion-Aspects:
The design concept for the combination office, hotel, shopping, ar.d cultural
development is a corridor down the center of the site between Wimbleton Boulevard
and I•35 with a walkway connecting the various uses. The parking will be
placed on either side of the corridor. The Planning Commission felt that the
unified design would be an improvement over the current planned development
layout. A rendering of the design is included In, the packet for illustration.
.w
3
The Planning Commission felt that. the street layout would be an improvement over
the original concept in that it provides boulevard connections with both 1-35 and
State School Road.
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission folt that the major advantage of the proposed amendment
is the widening of State School Road which was not a provision of the original
planned development. This consideration, along with the improved design and
the recommended reduction in intensity disposes the Planning Commission to
recommend approval of Z-1445 with the conditions enumerated below.
Conditions for the Planned Development:
l) The maximum development shall be as follows:
Office Site 1 Maximum of 285,000 square feet office space
Multi Family Site Maximum of 270 units
Restaurant Site 1 Maximum of 100 seat restaurant
Cultural site Maximum of 675 theatre seats
Hotel and Restaurant Maximum of 300 hotel rooms and 200 seat restaurant
Office Site 2 Maximum of 181,000 square feet office space
Village Shopping Maximum of 80,000 square feet of y^oss leasable area.
Site plan approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council is required
before development. Variations in the actual site dimensions can be approved
on the site plan as long as the building density is not increased.
i
2) The developer Willconstruci the street system including Wimbleton Boulevard
j and Village Way as indicated by the plan, Wimbleton Boulevard will be constructed
in the initial phases of the development ot, the north side of this street.
The developer will widen State School Road to 45 feet from Wimbleton Boulevard to
Interstate 35 when the traffic volume is 14,000 trips per day.
3) The developer will follow the design concept presented on the rendering,
to the extent that the pedestrian way, Weldon Walk, will be built and the
buildings will be sited generally along the corridor. The developer is not
required to follow the.rendering to the extent that the buildings will have to
be sited or designed as Illustrated and variations in the location of the walk
can be approved on the site plan.
4) The maximum building height for the office area fronting on State School
Road is 2 stories. The other office area and hotel area can have taller
buildings if approved on the site plan.
5) A minimum 10 foot wide landscaped area will be provided adjoining the east i
side of State School Road Right of Way and the north side of Wimbleton Boulevard
Right of Way.
6) The site designated Recreational shall be maintained as open space by the
developer for recreation and drainage purposes unless the property is dedicated j
to the City-for park development and the Cit5r accepts the dedication.
r
I
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
f TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
f FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: March 13, 1980
RE: Traffic Generation of the Calusa Development on State School Road
The Engineering Department basically agrees with the traffic anaylsis done
by the developers traffic engineer. We agree with the trip generation
numbers. We have a little bit of reservation about the 20 percent reduc-
tion of the commercial traffic. We think that this might be closer to 10
percent. That would make their total average daily traffic count from out-
side the development approximately 32,000 ADT (average daily trips). We
would agree with the developer's traffic engineer in that a four lane divided
facility with left turns will carry approximately 30,000 to 40,000.vehicles.
However, because of the nature of the development and the peak loading periods,
we think that this facility would carry closer to the 30,000 than the 40,000.
This in effect uses up all the capacity of State School Road. It does not al-
low for any other type of development further south or east of Caluse. It
would be the Engineering Staff's recommendation that some amount of traffic
be reserved for future development. We would suggest a number.of•soamewhere
in the neighborhood of 5,000 vehicles. The number of average daily trips
per residential household is approximately eight to ten. This 5,000 vehicle
trips per gay would then allow for future expansion and growth to the south
and east of approximately 400 to $00 residential units.
I
c ve
JI
I
II -
1
/V\ L' /1 , t 4 to ,`c r.^y~R rl c r.,C.
t, r r v A`A a'
®choffor Consuftents L.td
C CONSULTING ENGINEERS r; `iaJ
*p~
109-2003 McKN ICNN T BOULEVARD NORTHEAST ~ • 1 s ~
CALGARY. ALBERTA 726 BL2 Oli O7B -Baia 10
December 21 1979-
151-3-1-} g ,;Y
Calusa Development Inc. n. Jr14 'S6+~, %4 c ~
c/o levins Consulting Ltd. x~; 'i
4935 40 Avenue NW
333 Market Mall Professional Building
' Calgary, Alberta.'T3A 2N1
i
a ,a, r~~ L }„1 r'~T diY`f
as y
Attn: Mr. D )h
ave Lie ins t r ti Y' c _ r°. , :
Dear Sir Y' S'% C F,n, s ~nYy'. J , >,,i C of '.•,1x ~.':;JR '
a.•al
1 br t
gt vsy,' • PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
VIT,TEMJ A r1J
R.1fe have, ovaTuated, the traffic' Impact; of ther proposed; developments ~
s ,L, xituated approximately.. twa miles, from Dentont W Interstate 35 East{, ` ks
'I and are pieesect t k present herewitht the results, of ou* aWysi>w ~ .
j~yr. N?ryr`1'.f ty 1a~;(Yi J.,.~,0~'•, .•'f}' ~ e,ce ~.i}~ T X~,..•. .
1'r t TRIM: GENERJCIION 477.x'L'r~F'4a1,'Y'ii
%
a L v 1 l« L`' a+w
1.1 Office Development
N:C:H.R.P., Repbrt•Nuaiber 50, published'' by, the Highway Research` board,-
summarizes the results of studies 'Carried out at a number of offtoE ~,a' ,
buildings. The trip generation rate for
' general office buildingx
averaged 12.3 trips per 1000 square feet of leasable area. Because
tbe+ppr~~oposed development is not situated near public transit faci
and because'it'Is suburban its nature; a rate of 13 vehicle trips par ~
1000'square ffeet G1A,, day; was used for analysts:
M
1. Notelaand Restau ent~ bev'elopmertii
Hoteli generate an average of about 10.5 trips per day
plus 6 trips per seat for restaurant and lounge facilities,besed.
on studies carried out in a nuWber of U:5c, Cities. These factors 4
were applied directly to,the hotel and restaurant facilities proposed
l M Y .,I f •
for the, development.
r r.. T.3, Residential Developments ` y Y`•'aaF .r' r ' rY ~.e4 yZ a IrF1:.y:.
Basea'ort datki frame: number of muAicirlittes in Texas;' including
Pheonix, San-Antonio, San Angelo, Wichita Falls, and Texerkana, the '
average trip generation rate for residential development ranged
from 7 to 8 vehicle trips per household. Because the proposed `
development is suburLn in nature, the trip generation rate will
likely be at the high end of the range and therefore a rate of 8
trips per household was used for analysis.
•
c
H; s b
9ohaffer Consultants :td.
1.4 shopping Centre
'
Trip generation rates for shopping centres vary considerably,
depending on the size of the centre. Larger centres will
generally have a lower trip generation rate than smaller centres. ;
For the 80,000 square foot shopping centre proposed for the
+i
development, the trip generation rate can be expected to be
about 80 trips per thousand square feet, based on studies of 21 `
shopping centres of similar size in the United States and Canada
1.5 ` Total Trip Generation
,
The total daily trip generation from the proposed development;'.
based on the trip generation rates described above, will be
about 34,000 ADT. Of these trips, approximately 80000aft generate"
Ay th office developmt,.85OVby the proposed shopping centre.
s`r..•;'"M0by the hotel., restaurant and cultural facilities.: and 16:OOa
by the proposed single family and multi-family residential development.
,;'8eeausroftt*,,balanced. mix of development, a proportion of.
'Y14Hsd ths tots ~ ~ ~i
wilVrwalw. internal`: to the site.- Based on similar,'dewTopeed '
r v ',)4*. other, ary r tit 6W be•, assueed•, that 3W of the-tote l,. residerttl&I
.tri s of~-the totaY coew trial trips will be';intern$l`to the ?x r.,
ft ,
e. There4ore, the `external` trip generation will be about 30.On0.
" Peak hour volumes are istiinted at 10x of the ADT.. The residentfe}
peak will be oriented towards Denton, but the corresponding ccawierci&T4..
peak will be oriented towards the proposed development. Therefore', a< IN
directional split of 50150 during the peak hour was assumed for analysis.
TU? D STRrPVTM, AM4 ASS1GFMiENT } sy4 „
r » s
' . 11x'can b assumed t6i most external trips` too' from the tits will r ,t s} s
•;,c
be. oriented in the directior ot, Denton: Access to the. Hotel; site.,
'will be available from the service road, but the return trip=,;:p10s" fi .
all other external trips, will be by way of the roadway to the east..
of the site.. The major east west roadway within the site will carry
all of the site traffic except for about half of the traffic which
originates in the residential area to the south. That half of the
traffic wi11 haat direct access to the roadway east of the site.
~Frosthe ,foregoing4-the daily traffic volumes on the manor roadways
r. were calculated. and are shown on the accompanying- plans r, •
l:..a1 Y
•il
- • 1. [rife
lei-
£aoheffer Consultant- Ltd.
3. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND.ROADWAY REQUIRENENT~
Based on the peak hour of 10% and a 50/50 split of traffic as
described above, a two lane roadway with no channellzatiorrat the
Intersections will carry about 12,000 ADT. If the intersections
are channelized (separate left turn lane), a two lane roadway a:
Aqi
ould carry about 16,000 ADT. If four lanes were provided, with
w
protected left turn lanes, the capacity would be increased to about w`
3D,000 to 40,000 ADT, depending on. the volumes on the cross streets :.5~,,
w<
For, the proposed development, the projected volumes will eventually
warrant four lane divided facilities for the malfteast west roadway
up to the cul-de-sac at the hotel-site. and for the roadway to the i
east of the site,, from,tbe east west roadway to the interchange with
I35E:.However, provided that inersections are channelized, a twv Tane?~
roadway should be sufficiEnt unAil a traffic volume of 16.000 isreeechOf
p A qt upk to about the 60Z ta* 70X development level. Owbalance* of ,thermajor roadways, in. the site shoull provide for;
_k, tayo through Tenn pTus; parking. At major intersections, the parking ;
r aliould ba, eliainated and four lane% should bamade available,
1«XY r•V •~e.td~fi~t"'.'.~. r.r it~"<J,`..d d,~.t ti•; ~t. t,11 '„7=".
ro development proceeds. the traffic•on the roadway to the east o1< fp*~ ~
the. site will increase to the point where It exceeds the traffic.»
one the services. roads at the interchange with 135E., For. this
reesoar.. the, traffic on the road to the east of the site should have
the right-of-way over the:-traffto on the service roads; 'and the
Interchange should be signed accordingly. Provided these changes
are made; the ramp intersections should accommodate the traffic
geperated by the proposed development. If service road volumes
incrersa'significantl because of other developments, , 181te, aft nte
raw rs
y lized. the
"prent to be`pigna
T V.
rehenga*t eI
ly, has rovision fora four lane {
t roadway under the structure. Traffic analysis indicates that' this
twill be sufficient to accommodate projected traffic at the full c °
w
7development,stage.
4. CONCLUSIONS APO, I DNS
a;. From the foregoing analysis and discussion. the following conclusiuns
-.;and recommendations can be made.
)
F
1
' siiohsffor Consultants Ltd. ;,4' •+1 ,~'~,~~.,5
4.1 The main east west roadway through the site should eventually
be a four lane divided roadway from the roadway east of the t /
site to the cul-de-sac at the hotel. Until traffic volumes
reach about 16,000 ADT (70% development level) a two lane Pv
roadway with channelized intersections will to sufficient.
4.2 The roadway to the east of the site should eventually be upgradedd
to a four lane divided roadway from the east-west roadway to the
interchange with 135E. However, the PPresent two lane roadway wi1T
suffice until traffic volumes reach about 16,000 ADT, provided
intersections are channeiized. A e} \ , Yt
w }IM
4.3• The present interchange witty. 1351; can acornoodate the pro~ec
traffic volumes at Che full development stage provided that traffi c;
coatroVsfgn1ng1s oriented te.permit thru movement on the inter
settidg< road. If servtee4 road volumes, grows significantly bemuse
s , 0 other. developwt, raoe-" fntersections mey have to be slw*li;qtk
• ♦ waN l' #xp- ~1"1(3 1..dAY..4f,
✓..i .Y`d f•►•• F^}~M ~ r.% ...1. T ?~3c! f+ Y#'. ~x 1 ~ ri` ~7 • '.t ' ~ +U~
. ~ . u ~ • iii 1';1 fw y~f `p ~ t,~~~
4' 4~ q** belancr dt me or roadways witbfrv the;sitei will; bap'adequetiid'
twos lane roadooji with parking lanes: " Parkin. should be reeroved at,"
th& intersections. v ;
K. S: ♦ ~x' 1 ~ •J', lea ys, i
ire'trusc'than tbe= i,ni6mbtfoh- above witf fulfill your requiresrents
yod
at thts time. If or they•rpprovtnq ruthorities have, any questions=,,
of, 4i ;further info rmatton is requireds please, omtact; us. }r
Yours very truly,
' ~ r -!rJ "1 ~1, ~ 3 0. r ` 1 T r Y /_~r y}r~~`~
SCHEjFFER 4COqqqNSULTAMI'V LTD.
•r~ r P. R , F. IA,} * \ i `1 f > `K-y y +
~b el r ' 571
• 1 > , rfc. ~ C,:'a~ ~ F N aS I - r y A~ i It 1 J ~ ~ a. t e#i-i! .
l Mr. Rion Scheffer En
10
P
! 3 1.Pl{~~~y T R ye S.'.,•'h `A~ > Icy'
rJA Iv('lJ
j~
I~
1 1
~ XA
I % I 'i Ye del)..
I-_ ~ N ♦ 1~ 'T tilts
r ~ l l f t
M •
nt 4,
{ 7~ . I I
ft f ♦s 1 ' ~ yl ,IiT
4 1
Z=1445
. Ai
s
L
*W -Iev
OF I'• I 1 (.1+'1 , i..!' . L 1 '.I'' 1 . 1. • r . / r r'L . • r 1 . (
I .i L1 I , 1 ~ I I ~ ;r}
• I
IIX
I i - 1 Il. . • . • it • • • n~ + S • TA
`T +13s•'k~ ~ i ; .1 x,11 i ,~1, , t , , l,I.y. Q , ' r : ~ 1 ' I~ ~ '
•L'ir t~7?r , ~ ' I ! q'~`~~~1;~ . ' T•• nL'•• ' ' ' ,T{ i ' :Y• i ,r
i 11 , 5 ' ~h • r • .
' (1~71!I3k:S34*Iiti1+/ Y ' 4 O~ r l l'~. l LI y1~.H ~ ,Ir, ~ ;,,u.r r N M , . ~ ~ ~ ` )l+~ M
• ~~~7~'i7.J. r l,ir ~ f '~I 7, ~'10„!' h L' 11 i/' ~ r rl ~ L 1 ~ , •T!' a.
• • 1:1tS~~{.7NfS;T'7177 `JX ~ L+ Li , ,if 1; 'I. \ Y , ~
OWPIAIM
, 'ti r I I
AV,
, ' i 'i;. ' F~ I !i,± r 1 Imo.. J. .L' 1• , ~ /
4~' ' yr} I + ~ rY 1"y ~ 1i L / .`~r;,,l"1'~+. . ~ ~ ~ M
~1. 1 rYF~. I '.r [ / r ~1• ' \ / • Y i F w r !.1 r.
T 1 1 • L ! tY _
~Ih It /,r+ .1~,1~ii ~ Iw-, 4• i` f r ~ 'A• .'K ~ ~ , , ~~.M ,w .
' ~ / 7~1 1 : ~ • •A ~11~~ 1~ ~ , , 1 1~1' ' J YYL
40~/
j I ' ~ , ,l FI' b ~ / ~ ' 1 • ''11th INfl,.r••urr. YNrK
1i!1't
i . r 1~ I '1 •.F (yp'~-1 , f ,{Ly/~,.~ 1r rrr.M w. ••r.Y.•.~w
~ ~~LLa rY~ ~ t.~ }1f /1 + ~~'y ' I' 'oll~ ,~~®~hll', ~u•,.,N" •li~•I~"'•
I, 4 V ~''Y'. 1 1 ~1: ~ H 1 E~1'+j 1 ~L , . wTll~ll
d~ 0 7t , C { S ; ~ ~ . kS ~ 'r ? 1 { ~ r ~ / / ~ r Y.nn LMnI uu~„ ~ LAY' *'•'+~I. utY'
Fy""+ ~Yl . 4•ii .J,~Ai~h. 'S .4• 1 {M. L I'rw•i'.i[Y r~ r
St ll L+ r~ ~-Ay. x
,r d LH , L , . y i Y'r ,r/4 ''74, 1 ' 1M• ; 1\' 1•M1MeM iM• ..`.~ILI I! r1r
11 ~IVJ A,
JrAR Kee-SI f r. I+Y 61.7:: L1Ki N"N•rll•f{Ir•Y,4 M:Ir.Y[•IIl r1YY\ICL'I 1.'Ld, j~L / •',I n!it /AA•1,,+1 ~u~_~_l. q.. wi Y-IYL/tiUL,1r.•.YN.Y .!/,Yl.Lai. w.,~•.
✓1.,•n,.U .I. r~..~'. 1,
1 lA~ ,
I p
I
,.w
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
P
I
i ~
1 wwiwan vowel
rl
i f•
I ~ I ~ 1l
t rim t
1{
{ 1
1 I
l ] 1
f
a
f
e
RENDERING
I
I. y
1,,',,
y
Y010
y
a
rtt 4'rt
f '
1
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
Z-1445
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED ,
Robert H. Mitchell Bert Haysliy
Rt. 3 Box 49 2920 Tomlee
Denton, Tx 76201 Denton, Tx 76201
Betty .Beth Douglas Gene Bolton ,
2900 Tomlee 2916 Tomlee
Denton, Tx 76201 Denton, Tx 76201
Banner Chevrolet
419 University
Oenton, Tx 76201
Diane Keller
2909 Tomlee
Denton, Tx 76201
I
f
I
}
4
i ;
V
I
i
t ,:tS
y
G
v
t1
t ` REPLY FOR ME CITY COUNCIL
Case. No. Z-1445
t
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition.
If you desire to express an opinion, pleas4 complete this reply form and
return it to the following address by the date-of the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton. Texas 76201
If 20% or more of the property ownerr receiving this notice ratura a
reply form in osition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply;
form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Ccwd'ssion, those coat
meats are a sufficient response rnd ails be presented to the City Council
If you: opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use..
this form to notify us concerning your positign.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, pleases call the Plmmiag
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only, 16,
since blua: ink cannot be x`rozed.
REPLY nFjG
I am in favor of this ioning request. 11401
.eio
( ) I an opposed to this zoning request.
( ) L sm undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows:
f_
Signature
.
Address
phone/
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Case. No.Z 1445
i
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informal decision on the zoning patition.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and
return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing.
Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton. Taxas 7620L
If 20% or more of the property ownerr receiving this notice return a
reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If =submitted a reply'
form for considevation. by the Plamj and Zoning Commission, those: com-
ments are a sufficient response and w.1L be presentad to the City Council
If your opiniou about this case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this form to notifg us concerning your position.
If you have questions pertrtaing to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
i
Please use BLACK ink only, 0A
since blue ink cannot be xeroxed. C1
REPLY L~
(~I am in favor of this zoning request. ~p
( ) I = opposed to this zoning request.
( ) I = undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as foliowss
J
I
I
• Ii
1
Signature
Address
Phone
lp~
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Casa. No. _LJ345-
Tb4 Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition.
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and
return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 7620L
If 20% or more of the property owners,raceiving this notice return a
reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply,
dorm for consideration by the Planningg and Zoning Commission, those coon-
meats are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Council
If your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this form to notify us concerning your position.
1 If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call, the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only-,
since blue ink cannot be xeroxad. f►
REPLY ~G
( I am in favor of this zoning raqust. x'14
( ) I an opposed to this zoning request.
( ) L am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows.
C
1 I -
i
f
Signature +b
Address
Phone..
I
7
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COIIISSION
Case No. Z-1445
The Planning Commission would like, to receive your comments on this
j
case in order that they may maka a batter informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you desire.to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the data of
the public heariv g.
City Planner
Municipal Building
213, East McKinney
Denton, T.eus 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public kear-
ing and we encouraga all interested parties to attend and comment if .
they wish. If 20% or more of the propert7 openers receiving this notic*
return this reply form in oppositics to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four fifths (4/5) vote to approve i.t.
If you. have questions pertaining to the casi, plaas* call th* Planning
Office at 566-8350. •
Please use BLACK ink only.
1 RZPLY
/ RNEIVED MAR 2
~O L ant in favor of this zonipS request.
I am opposed to this zoning request,
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request. .
1 My comments are ae follows:,
Signature
Address A~1 &;4-•
ti
a
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Case. No. Z-1445
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision o3 the zoning petition.
If you desire to express an opinion, please comp[ats this reply form ono
return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing. j
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 Last McKinney
Denton, Texas 7620L
If 20% or more of the property owners,recsiving this notice return a
reply, form is opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (415) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply
form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, those eom
Monts are a sufficient response and wi1L be presented to the City Council
If your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this form to notify us concerning your position.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only,, stn
since blue ink cannot be.xeroxed.
REPLY
O
( ) I sm in favor of this zoning request. 9A~
(K) I am opposed to this zoning request.
{ ) I an undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows: WW1 Ia_ d A'~"' 44,V.A
f- ,
i
'WZ_A~ 41 op
r 1
W Id"
L
Signature 1n
Address Ag20
Phone
J
REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
a ~J Case No. 1-1445
The Planning Commission would like.to receive your comments on this !
case in-order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council, If you desire.to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
-Denton, Taus 76201
This reply form in no way affects ywir rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if ,
they wish. If 20% or more of the proparty owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in opposition to the proposed cbanges the City
Council must attain a four-fifths (415) vote to approve it.
If you,have questions pertaining to the casis please call the Plawing
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only.
FC
)tEPLY yq~
( ) Lam ir. favor of this zonipg request. !
I am opposed to this zoning request.
E
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request. .
My comments are u foll*W$3-
r
I
i
Signature
Address _ Zg1(,r.
M
J
i
I
i
w~rr.
Its, A
11011ge Al...
• j
't. 2 f CAN At A-4,
U-4 . it
1
fzlrAi 'h-
T~
71JA P
i
I
14)1 TAJUIOIP
lt1
0119 - I., jdA.i", .71 IA
J 1
V I
7111 1 _ j
AW"
1! Li A~.rfn.w
~ nntt.h~ 11
I y!
II -
IF
I
tel.'
i
1
I
I
. J
~ ._..R+ ,v s A.. aI d ! nee , I
t
r
i
l
I
~r
1
I t
1
j
t
t
i
1.
ff~~
~..r.r+-r l«.....: e.i..l'd., ..Y'a~r.l.s..~.::a.,. F.+ .'ii late-It 6'Y: M Aa~i. fi~ifl
Minutes
Planning and Zonin Co-mission
March 19, 1980
The reggular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was held on
March 19, 1980 at 5:0o p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: 8111 Brady, Robert La Forte, Linnie McAdams, Carole Busby, Andy Sider,
and Richard Taliaferro. Staff members were John lavretta, Charlie
Watkins, Rick Svehla, and Sue Wigand.
ASSENT: Marilyn Gilchrist.
Chairperson McAdams called the meeting to order.
1. Approve the minutes of the March b, 1981 meeting.
The minutes were amended as follrws: Andy Sider seconded the motion
on Zoning Case 1408: Mr. L, T. Hollandale should be Mr. L. T. Holland.
Motion made by Bill Brady and seconded by Andy Sidor to epprove the
{ minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
It. Sonslder the final plat of Skyline Addition.
Linoie McAdams explained that because of the opposition expressed
after the last meeting the Planning Commissior, would rehear the case.
Ross Melton spoke in favor of his request. He also stated he was
opposed to the reconsideration of this plat.
John lavretta stated that it was the City Attorney's opinion that
the.Planning and Zoning Commission could rehear the case since the
City Council will make the final decision.
Piul Lewis, owner of 1618 Kendolph spoke in opposition to the plat.
Twenty people stood in opposition to the plat.
Bill McCarter, owner of adjoining property, spoke in opposition.
Mrs. Burns, owner of 1610 Kendolph, spoke in opposition.
Don Desiderato, owner of 1602 Avenue C, spoke in opposition.
John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation.
The Commission discussed the case with Mr. Melton.
theifinalsplat ofySkylineiAddition. Motionbcarr ber edtunanimousiy,deny
III. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1443. This is the petition of Mr. Charles P. Mulkey requesting
a change of zoning frai Single Faoily (SF-7) to General Retail (GR)
I v
WWI
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 19, 1980
Page 2
zoning classification on a tract approximately .5 acres in size. The
property begins at the southeast corner of the inArsection of Cleveland
Street Eagle for a Drive distana of extends approximately "30 nfeet~ south side of
Eagle Dri
John Lavretta described General Retail zoning classification.
William Philips, representing Mr. Mulkey, spoke in favor of the request.
Mr. Mulkey spoke in favor of the request, stating that this zoning change
would permit a 10 bay car wash.
Joe Normile, owner of 407 Eagle Drive, spoke in favor of the request.
' George Abney, owner in of 913 oppositevela th Street, representing himself and
his fathers John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation, which waa denial.
Mr. Mulkey spoke in rebuttal.
The Commission discussed the case.
1 Motion was made by Taliaferro and seconded by Brady to approve Z-1443.
Motion carried by a vote of 4 to 2.
B. Z-1444. This is the petition of Mr. Billy Redmun requesting a
change of zoning from Single Family (SF-7) to Multi Family Restricted
(W-R) zoning classification at 717 ?ashy Straet. The tract is approxi-
mately one acre in size and is more particularly described as City Lot 13, 1
Block 270. I
Billy Redmon, petitioner, spoke in favor of the request.
No one spoke in opposition.
John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation.
Billy Redmon spoke in rebuttal.
Richard Taliaferro left at this time.
The Commission discussed the case at length.
Motion foiled was made of S Brady 2nd seconded by Sidor to approve Z-1444. Motion
04
by a vote C. 2-1445. This is the petition of Mr. Robert Nickerson requesting an
ariendrient to a planned development (PD . The planned develornt ('D)
begins at the southeast corner of the revs ion of State permitted commercials
and Interstate 35E. The origins planned t permitt proposes
shopping, and two story garden apartment uses. rhe r
cres; retail shopping, hotel, and
on epproxely restaurant, 90 theater,
offices ecrentlonl usesfamily
Robert Nickerson, petitioner, spoke in favor of the request, describing
the area. .
)n
Lf E3T~ ,
Minutes
Planningg and Zoning Comission
March 19, 1980
Page 3
John Lavrotta presented the staff recommendation.
The Commission discussed the case.
Motion was made by Robert LaForte to approve Z-1445 with the recommendations
of the Planning and Community Development Department. Andy Sidor seconded
the motion and it carried unanimously.
IV. Considerations:
A. Consider the request of Mr. W. T. Smith for deannexation of approximately
28 acres.
The request was withdrawn.
B. Consider the final replat of Pual Hammilton Addition.
Charles Watkins stated that all requirements have been met and
recommended approval.
Motion was made by Bill Brady and seconded by Brady and seconded by
j LaForte to approve the final replat of Paul Hamilton Addition. Motion
j carried unanimously.
i C. Consider the final replat of the Schmitz and Ripy Addition.
Charles Watkins recommended approval.
Motion was made by Brady and seconded by Sidor to approve the final
replat of the icheitz and Ripy Addition. Moti-)ia carried unanimously.
D. Consider the final replat of th' Owsley Park Addition.
Charles Watkins recommended approval.
Motion was made by Brady and seconded by Sidor to approve the final
replat of Owsley Park Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
E. Consider the final replat of the Phillips Addition.
i
Motion was made by Brady and seconded by Busby to deny the final replat
of the Phillips Addition.. Motion carried unanimously.
F. Consider the final replat and site plan approval of Daugherty Addition.
Motion was made by Andy Sidor and seconded by Bill Brady to table
this consideration. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Consider the request of Mr. Jerel Harvey that the Planning and
Zoning Commission initiate a zoning petition in the Westgate area for
Agricultural (A) zoning.
The Commission discussed the situation with Mr. J. Harvey.
The meeting adjourned at 700 p.m.
+ Y.~_~ ^r.r'~rr °°~~!~IOYrabLl►r 1'Yrrll s' ~ ' VJa..a.... _ ~ ..~..eJ ~..u L,... ~ iLlwrarry.' e.a....... ,1~■■■■■
f
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 15, 1980
Agenda Item:
Consider an ordinance instituting annexation proceedings concerning the petition
of Mr. Jack Brown and hr. Neil Hill, general partner, Duncan Properties ltd., ?
on a 6.53 acre tract which begins approximately 700 feet southeast of the inter-
section of Colorado Boulevard and loop 288.
Summary:
The petition of Mr. Jack Brown and Mr. Neil 11111 received favorable consideration
at the City Council public hearing of March 25, 1980.
Action Required:
In, order to continue the annexation process the Council should move to institute
annexation proceedings and instruct the City Planner to publish the ordinance.
Exhibits:
f A) Memo
8) Map
C) Ordinance
I
i,
t
I
I
k
i
I
y
1 y
~r
a• ~i Is i r
~~~~wRt1
' ~ INPOA, 11lipi. III
i
06
\ JF/R•'„A \/4
r 1
\1 1*00 1
Z-1436
1 '
\
Art. 00
•
~,ot,
1 i
i
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNIXINO A TRACT OF LAND CONTIOUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS !SING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTINO 014 APPRO IRATELY 6.53 ACRES OF LAND Lrr AND
DEINO SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DSNTONs STATE OF TEXAS AlNI BalmSMVV COU ` LAM CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS oAIMI C~ULCTURAI, "Ali DIS~CT PROpE~ITYi~AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WNEREAS, the request for annexation was Introduced at a
regular meeting of that City Council of the City of Denton, Texan;.-
on the Petition of JACL DROWN AND NSIL/ETLL OBNERAL PARTNEii DDNCM
PROPERTIES LIMITIID; and
WHIRBAS, an on-)ctunity was afforded, at a public benrist held'
toe that purpose an March 11s 1010 for all interested persem is
state their views and present evidence bearlat open that aaaexntfae
provided by this ordinances and
WHEREASs this ordinance hot leer published in-fait at least
k one tiro in the official newepopor of the City of Denton, Team.
I prior to Its effective dates and'after the public hearings;
NOW THERIFORE, 1`112 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 01MR, TEXAS,
i HEREBY 6RDAINSt
I SECTION I.
j That the Feralsafter deierlbed tract of load has and the seat
to hereby amoved to the City v Denton, Texas, sad the sane to
made hereby apart of said City sad the land and the present and
future Inhabitants thsteof shall be 4otitltd to all she ri
ghts laid
privileges of other citleam of said City and shall be bound 1r
the lets lad ordinances of said City aov In street or which my
hereafter be enacted and the property sit" ted therein shall be
eab/act to and shill bear its prorate part of the taxes levied br
the. City. The tract of land hereby, annexed to described as
follows, to•wttt
All that certain tract or parcel. of land situated in the D.
Lambert Survey Abstract No. '114, Denton County, Texas and being
ppart of a track deeded to Jackie Brown and recorded to' Vol=o 521
& It 124 and part of a tract deeded to Jrekie Brown by rout
Wa~laca recorded in VoUae 5161 Page 162 of the Dad Reeor11s of
Denton County, Texas and being note pattteulary described as
followst
310INNINO at s point in the existing City Limits of Denton as
dadfined in Ordinance No. 61.43 Tract I, said palm being south
01 47' west 24440 feet from the northeast corner of a tract
deeded to Jackie Brown by Frank We:lsee recorded In Volume 516,
Page $61 of the Deed toe Ords of Denton County, Texrsl
Jr,
y
-
TNENCS south 110 4l, xeet with DroxaFs fast line 917,4 Net to a
point in the existlul City Limits as defined in Ordiaaaera No.
85.41 Tract Iii
THENCE north 470 43' wast with the existing city Limits 797,1
feet to an eagle Pala! !n said City Limits=
THENCR in a northeasterly direction with aid City Limits alons a i
0"J" to the rlttht a distance of 325.1 feet and a central angle of
OS $40 and red us of 1i39,97 fast,
THENCE north din is 30" east aloes ssid City Limits 399.0 teat
to the place of beginning and eontalnlat 6,53 acres of IsadF. more
or less.
The above described r
' property is hereby eluslfied as
Agricultural "A" District mad shall to appear on tAe official
' Ionia$ asp Of the City of Heaton, Texap$ which
hsre¢}~
• needed aceordially. to
1
~t_ ON, III
This ordinance shall be effective immediately Open its
' passele.
I PASSED AND APPROVED this the , day of
' A. D, 1910.•
CITY 0! SMN, TERM
ATTES'Tr
MUUKS
f E i CI
TY OP DEN~ON, TEXAS
cAPPROM AS TO LWAL FOORNATTOtNEY 1
CITY of DE R11, HW {
Er,
t.
• I
t
k ~
No •
AN ORDINANCE 0? THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REMOVING PARKING ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHESTNUT BETWEEN AVENUE E AND AVENUE D•
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL O~
CONFLICTING ORDINANCES OR PARTS THEREOF; PROVIDING PENALTIES;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THA CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I, i
That the south side of Lhostnut Street from Its intersection
i
with Avenue E to its Intersection with Avenue r, shall not be
used for the perking of vehicles or in any manner obstructed nt r
anytime, and the same shall be so posted by signs or markings or
both by the proper authorities of the City of Denton, Taxes.
SECTION 11.
That if any section, subsection, parefraph, sentence,
clause, phrase or word In this ordinance, or applitatlon thereof
to any person or circumstances Is hind invalid by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the i
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it
would have enacted such remaining portions dospite any such
Invalidity, js
1
SECTION 111.
That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the
provisions of this ordinance become effective which are incon•
slstent or In conflict with the terns or provisions .ontalned In
this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such
i
conflict.
SECTION Iy. 1
That is is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person to
park any vehicle except on authorited emergency vehicle or
police or fire vokicle on any portion of the above described
streets as is posted or marked by the proper authorities of the E
City of Denton, and that Section I•S of the Denton Code of
f
Ordinances, as amended, is lncorporatei into this ordinanco as
if set out in full herein, and the penalty by fine not to exceed
Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) is applicable hereto for r.aeh
separate offense.
SECTION Y.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (111
i days from the data of its passage, and the City Secretary is
V hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton t,ecord•Chronic Is, the official
newspaper of the City ok Denton, Texas, within ten (1)) dsys of
V
the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1Dg0.
i
I
MAYO
MY OF DMUtr, TEXAS
AYTESTt
i
CITY OP DEN~'ON, TEXAS j
is
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOM
Ce J. TAILOR JR. CAS
CITY OF DENTbN, XAS
BY: _
:
I
I
i
v
I
CITY OF rENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor City Council Members
FROM: Sill Angelo, Administrative Assistant
DATE: April 10, 1980
SUBJECT: Agenda item #5 - Location of Electric Meters
This item was placed on the Agenda at the request of Councilman
Hensley and will involve discussion on the location of the
t City's electric meters, No additional backup material will be
f. provided for this item.
f
ST Angelo
SAtjm
r ,
i
y!
i
,
I
I I
1
CITY OF D£NTON
MEMORANDUM
1 I
1
DATE OF MEETING: April 15. 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA):
Consider final payment on the McCormick Street Draina;le Project.
SUMMARY:
Denton Constru.tion has finally finished the McCormick Street Drainage
project. Since they have accumulated a large amount of pe,ialty days and are
unwilling to provide a maintenance bond, the Staff recommends that the
retainage for the project be kept by the City and final payment be based
on the last payment made to the company which was made in July of 1979.
E FISCAL SUMMARY:
There were no overages in the quantities of the contract and since there
m rP -)enalty days the total cost of the contract will be $90,254.50
Instead of $102,203.44.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council should approve the final payment which is the same as the payment
of July 1979.
ALTERNATIVESI R
G Take legal action to obtain maintenance bond and more penalty.
~ i
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To adopt payment of $90,254.50 as the final payment for the McCormick
Street Drainage project.
EXHIBITS%
{i) Letter from Greg Edwards
2 Memo from Rick Svehla
(3) Partial Payment No. 11
i
n
pal
Q /
C17'Yo1DENIrON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DFNTON, 7EXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
April 2, 1980
Denton Construction Company
P.O. Box 1526
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: McCormick Street Drainage Improvements
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Enclosed are letters dated 21 February 1980 and 3 March 1980 from the
! City of Denton to Denton Construction Company. As of this date the
City of Denton has not received a maintenance bond or any statement
from Denton Construction Company on the staff recommendation for final
payment on this project. We have scheduled to present the final payment
on this project to the City Council on 15 April 1980. If we do not receive
a Maintenance Bond by that date, vie will recommend to the City Council
that the entire amount of the ritainage be held in lieu of liqu',dated
damages,
Sincerely,
II
l r
j W6 Edwards
Senior Civil Engineer
GE:fd
I
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
i
~I
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: April 9, 1980
RE: Final Payment to Denton Construction for McCormick Street Drainage
Improvements
Denton Construction finally finished the McCormick Street Drainage project in
February of this year. Contractor had accumulated a large amount of penalty
days mainly because of his inability to recruit workers. Staff recommends
that we retain $11,948.99 for the total project since the contractor has
indicated an unwillingness to obtain a maintenance bond and since his penalty
days have exceeded the amount of the retainage. The majority of the work has
been in place for quite some time and since all the construction was inspected
by City of Denton personnel, we feel that the City will not Incur large
maintenance costs on the drainage structure that would normally be covered by
! the maintenance bond. We have consulted the City Attorney's office and they
do not see any problem with this approach.
c ve a`
i
C?~FCK StEQUiSiT3rh.FOLCHEk
N=ber
$ %582.20
}'vy to Amount
Engineering and Development
Denton Construction Comoanv - - Department
P. 0. Box 1526 _ July 5,1979
Date
Denton, Texas 76201
-'.:r ar.ifor er. lnnatinn ACCOUTlt NO. net Inv. Amou~it
Atct. i'•alance Ir.::ics d~t~, n-
McCormick Street Drainage Inprovements 41-23-90-0'? $1.582.20
Partial Pa;ent Iio. 11
Quantities al per attached tabulation shee
{
i
i
J
i
1
V
i
i
I
1
TOW 1 5s 0
fs node by the ~;nd¢riitued. '
` The nbov^ hn,: b•~~., t= and Yttosir,,tidnlion for pa:ze6
001
' ..e_ + f
cceuntinR Api+ruval - sign2ture
A
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11
M..C{uICK STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Jul1 5, 1979
1: DENTON CONSTRUCTIDN COMPAW
P. 0. COX 1526
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
TOTAL CONTRACT AM'O.'yT - 532,545.75
DATE OF COMPLETir.,;+ - JL.LY i, 1973
BID QUANTITY UNIT EXTENSION
ITEM N0. F~ESCR:`~iC'1 OUAhITiTY C02, IPLE7E PRICE TOTAL
120 Vncl_ssi led
Ex.av!tion 19370 C.Y. 1,370 C.Y. 5 5.62 $ 70699.40
421-A Class A Concrete 28 C.Y. 61 C.Y. 139.10 8,485.10
h
421-8 Class 8 Concrete 1,775 S.Y. 21992 S.Y. 12.65 37,848.80
€ 440 Reinforclny
Steel 3,600 Lbs. 5,122 Lbs. .34 19741.48
i
i 465 48" Reinforce3
Concrete Pipe 760 L.F. 728.5 L.F. 52.53 38,268.11
470 Special Grate
Inlet 2 ea. 2 ea. 535.00 1,070.00
S.P.-1 Compacted Fill )40 C.Y. 940 C.Y. 3.75 '31525.00
- '
S.P.-2 Steel Grates 3 ea. 3 ea. 214.00 642.00
S.P.-3 Remove Box Culvert 1 ea. 1 ea. 9,114.00 $T--. 0~ 14B
i
TOT 51 *'P.K COMPLETED $1019393 89
LESS IC'. RETAINAGE 10,139.39
Li's> LIQUIDATED DAMAGES 1 000.00
T:T;L V-)O K PAYABLE ~
5 F?EVIOUS PAYMENTS 88,672.30
10TAL AMOUNT DUE 1582.20
APPROVED FOR: i.
CITY OF L DENTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
t 0.1 ?,A
Rick vehla
• ~j
- r d..
v
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: April is, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA):
Coneeider extending the contract with Jagoe Construction Coapany for the
Bonnie Brae Improvement Project.
SUMMARY:
Jagoe Public Construction at Bonnie Brae and Ave. E has experienced some
delays because of utility relocation problems from the gas and telephone
company. The staff has reviewed these delays and feels the 48 day extension
is reasonable,
t
FISCAL SUMMARY:
No extra cost to the City other than inconvenience already caused by the
utility delays, k
E
I
i
I s9
t
ACTION REQUIRED: t
Council should approve the 48 day extension to the contract. y
i
ALTERNATIVES:
I Not to approve extension and to charge construction company penalty days.
a.
4
I i
I STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Approval of the 48 days extension
i
EXHIBITS:
~1) letter from Jagoe Public ;
2} Memo from Rick Svehla
i
i
i
i
1
CITY OF NNTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: April 9, 1980
RE: Request for Additional Days on the Bonnie Brae Contract
In late February of this year, we received a letter from Jagoe Public
asking for a 120 day extension to its contract. In early March our staff
replied to Jagoe and told them realistically we could find 48 days where
the contractor was delayed from working because of the telephone company,
the gas company or reconstruction caused by unknown conditions. We have
discussed this with the contractor and attached is a letter from the
contractor agreeing to the 48 days. Therefore, we would recommend the
48 days be added to the contract for Bonnie Brae and Avenue E,
c QSvehla
f
j
i
j
i
i
SFr,
TAGOE-PUBLIC CU`IPANY ;
<
t A.
GM-AIAi. 01-FICGS e'1}4
( y hM
P. U. box 250
DENTON. TEXAS 16201
April 5, 1950
9
Mr. Rick Svchla
Director of Engineering
and Development y
' City of Denton, Texas
Municipal Bldg.
Denton, Tx. 76201
Door Rick,
We have been advised that Community Development has a treed
{ to allow us 48 days extra on the working days on Bonne
If Brae and Avenue L' for the delays as of February 22, 1980,
lie will accept thoir judgment on this allowance amount.
This project is almost completed, and even though we have
had several inconveniences, through the co-operation of
your engineers and inspectors we are going to have another i
quality job. ; I
f
Sincerely yours, 1
3
I Bill Cheek f
Vice-Prosidont-Finance
f
BC:pc
r
; 1 ~IpA-tom
i
l:a
I
u
DENTON BOY'S BASEBALL. INC.
THE STATL OF TEXAS S
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
COUNTY OF DENTON g
This Agreement made this the day of April, 1980, by
and between the Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc. hereinafter
referred to as "Association", and the City of Denton,
hereinafter referred to as "City", each acting by and through
its authorlted officials, pursuant to the following terms and
conditions:
j City agrees to deposit with the Association the suns of
Eleven Thousand and No/100 011,000.001 Dollars, and certain
feu and charges hereinafter described, fcr the City's fiscal
year 1980. Association shall submit ■n annual budget to the
Denton ?irks and Recreation Department for approval which shall
set forth on an Item by Item basis the fees and charges herein-
after described, and the above Eleven Thousand and No/100
($11,000.00) Dollars, the City will make one payment to the
Association on the 1st day of April 1980, In the amount
projected in the annual budget. City shall make such payments
solely from current revenues in the budget of the Parks And
Recreation Department. Expenditures shall be auth6rised for a
J period from April 1, 1980 through August 31, 1900.
Association agrees to provide qualiftid 'impiru for all
Soy's Youth League baseball games and special games that are
sponsored by the Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc.
fit.
Association agrees to the following Additional terms and
conditions:
1. It will establish a separate bank account for deposit
of the Eleven Thousand and N01100 (!11,000.00) Dollars paid to
the Association by the City and all expanditures for services
provided shall be made from this account.
i
II
It will establish, operate, and maintain an account
system for this program that will allow for a tracing of funds
and a review of the financial status of the program.
i 3. It will permit authorised officials for the City of
Lenton to review its books at any time.
i. It will reduce to writing all of its rules, reguta-
tions, and policies and file a copy with the Director of Parks
and Recreation or his authorised representative along with any
amendments, additions, or revisions whenever, adopted.
S. It will not enter Into any contracts that would /
encumber the City funds far a period that would extend beyond 1
the term of this Agreement,
j
5, It will prepare and submit a'report of expenditures and
revenues to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his repre-
sentative by the Ist day of September, 1980.
T, it will refund the balance of the special Rccount to
the City of Denton on or betare September 1, 1990.
R, it will promptly pay ail bills when submitted; unless
there is a dlscrepancy in a MI which shcvld be promptly ~
reported to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his auth-
orited representative for further direction.
9. It will appoint a representative who will be available
to moat with the Director of Parks and Recreation and other
City officials when reduestsd. r
10. it will indemnify and hold harmless the City from any
~i
and all claims and rules arising out of tho activities of the
AfsocIRtion, its employees, and/or contractors.
{
It will obtain releases from the officials which will
it.
release, indemnity and hold harmles► the City and the Asso-
ciation from any claims, Injuries, or damages of the officials.
12, it will retain officials as independent contractors And
not as employees.
IV.
The general terms and conditions are as follows:
1. It any of the terms and conditions ere not complied
i
i Mil
f
I
with by the Association, the City is authorized to refuse to
;hake any further payments until the condition on which the
complaint is based is corrected to the satisfaction of the City.
2. This contract shall be subject to all valid rules,
regulations, and laws applienhle thereto as promulgated by the
United States of America, State of Texas, or any other govern-
mental body or agency having lawful jurisdiction.
5. Association is authorized and should give notices
required herein to the Director of Parks and Recreation or that
person's authorized representative.
4. Any contributions or gifts receivel by the Association
are not subject to the provisions of this contract and they
should be kept separate and sport from the funds, charges, and
fees covered by this contract.
S. Association shall provide its services and be paid by
i the City In the capacity of an Independent contractor and not
is an agent or department of the City. It shall have complete
control, supervision, and responsibility for its activities
under this tontract including the hiring, supervision, and
control of its employees.
IN WITNESS k'IIEREOF, the parties hereto, acting under
authority of their governing body and Board of Directors, have
caused this contract to be duly executed in two counterparts,
each of which will constitute an original, as of the day
if April, lose.
i
KATUR
OVY OF UEgltvn, tuAAS E
ATTFSTt BOY'S BASEBALL, INC.
BY,.
L 6TAEY RUNN11 'KOBERT31`FRI;STDBFT
C1TY OP DENION, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORN: !
C. J. TAYLOR, JR. CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, AXAS
I
i
BYt
uk,4 L k;, -j 46L o-4
I
I
F 'P
I
:I,. iY1W M~V.Y a a....16YY.M♦~. .._~_.n. I.. ~ri~~i i_:
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 15, 1980
Agenda Item:
Consider the final replat of Paul Hammllton Addition.
summary:
The developer seeks to replat part of lots 12, 13, 141 and 15, Block 8,
Paul Hamilton Addition for the purpose of constructing a car wash.
Recommendation:
The aulPHammiltonnAdditio atrtheiromeeting ofd pMarchp19,a1980,the final replt;t of
f P
The Planning, Engineering, and Utility Departments have each reviewed the replat
f and recommend approval.
i
l Action Required;
f The City Council should move to approve the final replat of Paul Hamilton
F Addition.
Exhibits:
A) Marra All
B) Map
1
i
l
,
I f
I
I
[40LL
~ tw.rlda Olllvt
` ItOf
r
i
i
W
s
r BUT 14•A
,m Isft
e +<ww ~ ILL
W
1
~rr .rte. r.
a H'NU't Litt
1 •
Ii
E4i{ i
1
i
E
,
VIt1i IfY ilu
r
City of Denton
Memorandum
April 15, 1980
Ar,el nda Item:
Consider the final plat of Da rty Addition.
Summary;
The developer seeks to plat two lots which do not front on a public street.
The proposal in this case is to use a private drive which is approximately 30
feet wide to serve two buildings, one existing building which is usMd for storage
or machinery rand one proposed building to be used for storage and distribution
of frozen food.
The zoning ordinance specifies that "when a lot is desired to be used for a
combination of retail, commercial or industrial purposes, or for a combination
of these uses and dwelling purposes] or when two (2l or more main buildings are
desired to be placed on a lot and will not front a public street, then the same
may be permitted when a site plan for the total development is approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission,"
A site plan was submitted and approved by the Planning Commission showing a paved
k access easement. The City Engineer considered the possibility of requiring a
street to be extended to serve the development, however there is no,alignment
that would clearly be needed for future extension.
The Development Review Committee recommended that the developer extend a 6 inch
water line to a point along the frontage of Daugherty Street Snd'-installatidn of
two fire hydrants. The purpose of this recommendation is so the development
will have fire protection,
The City of Denton has Community Development Block Grant funds which will be
used for extension of a 6 inch water tine along Daugherty Street, however, this
project will not be completed until about September, V d0.
k Recommendation,
i The Planning and Zoning Commission recommendq approval of the final plat or
Daugherty Addition deleting the requirement for extension of the 6 inch water
line, there 1s an existing two inch line adjoining the property.
The Planning Engineering, Utility, and Fire Departments have each reviewed the
plat and feed that the developer should be required to extend the waterline
inasmuch as this property will be developed upon approval of the plat,
Alternatives:
A) The City Council can approve the plat and require the developer to extend
the 6 inch water line,
8) The City Council can approve the plat and delete the requirement 1or extension
of the 6 inch water line.
_s.u.-.•~•• ...~r-ter. - {~.r.~wJ,~ru ~i.w.rrir M.w tlL4'Wall-• _ -4~'.SI.U
Page 2
C) The City Council can deny the plat.
D) The City Council can table consideration of the plat.
Action Required:
In order to follow the Planning Commission recommendation the City council should
move to approve the plat without the requirement for extension of the water line.
Exhibits:
A) Remo
B) Plat
C) site Plan
i
i
f
• 1(I~'~TY 111► ~,',•~{fir{{F~;~. 7
OAWMt117Y !T. w RAU WMMLai
*all
t Y ; 1
AmpW Alf
Ory ONy?INSrl b j
I N I a
` t/. r►i~~rnl 1.143 ACRE
1:15? ACRE ~d TRACT
TRACT LOT 2 a
I, AZ MIAMI b LOT 1 I~ b
1 I
3 AM IA TRACT
loi olio n.R uoi3iiR►ow
1 .r
t
i
nrr.+ra
M.
Vii' ..0{
y'
1~v~V fYrlelle' ,~,•r jp,i~',.s,~l
...~...r...... .t „v,'
y ; y ttti
31
I~IN A #rt* I o f r•'
AfAP
1 _ ! • W,•
Ory o«y~..~rx~ , i"
%
o
{ AA PIe1rni 1.143 ACRE
TRACT 1
` 1,167 ACRE Nil LOT 2 1
TRACT ; a
LOT I 5 b
MIN
W's
SAC. I ACRC its TRAC?
1. M. CAVIOION TO N. MAL"
10110/10 O.R. contl AA/NL~~/r1vfl
i
{
i
~auG t,?T sr.
a .
•zs
Y
N d ~
.M
7 , n
Lr. y
N Q`2• r. "east ~~5.~' CA A -4"l,
v
r Q r 3t
• t aQ ~F. e°' 3 u
l ~ I
y