HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-06-1980 rsr,r
71
- rnwa.~
P.GENDA
CITY COUNCIL OF 6 H 1~ O Y OF DENTON
may BROADCAST LIVE ON KNTU RADIO, 88.5 P.M.
a ,
Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton at
7100 P.M., Tuesday, May 6, 19801 in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at wlich the following items of business will
be considered:
1. Approval tthe Special Called Meeting rofeApril 22, 19
15, 199 1980~ and 80.
1
2. Approval of, an Ordinance cAnvassing the returns and
declaring the results of the C•ty Council Runoff Election 1
of April 290 1980.
3• Administering the Oath of Office for newly elected Council
persons.
4. Election of Mayor Pro Tem.
5, Proclamation declaring the week of May 18-24 as
Tuba-Euphonium week in Denton.
6. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1446. This is Vie petition of Mr. Charles Glasgow
requesting three zoning changes on a parcel
approximately 26.4 acres in size which begins at the a
southwest corner of the intersection of Loop 288 an&
Audra Lane. The petitioner requests the followingo ~k
(1) a change of zoning from Agricultural (A) to
Commercial (C) classification on approximately 11.:
acrest (2) a change of zoning from Agricultural 2A2
' to Office (0) classification on approximately
acres; (3) a change of zoning from Agricultural (A)
to Planned Development (PD) for multi family use on
approximately 10.1 acres. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
z
t~iS
5.
~fr+ 4a
I
t Vol
i
u
City Council Agenda
May 6, 1980
Page Two
B. 2-1447. This is the petati chano ofldzoningiafgom
Joint venture requesting 9e
Planned Development
zoning PDclassificat classification. The property
Commercial (C) (C)
is located along the southeast aide of Loop 268
and
oning approximately on size. planning a
Z '
7. Appearance by WaYmand Devers requesting permission to hold
the annual Fiiwanis 4th of July Fireworks Show at Fouts
Field, `
8. Appearance by Mrs. Bob Berg to discuss the lack of an
organized summer neighborhood park program.
with Foirport Advisory Board concerning
9. Recommmenddatiioon from the
a lease agreement i
10. Recommendation from the Airport Advisory Board concerning b
an office lease agreement wir.h Al Yates.
'i
I
~ 11. Ordinances
A. Approval of an ordinance amending the zoning map of 4
the City of Denton, Texas, as same was adopted as an
appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of i
Denton, Texas, by Ordinance No. 69-1, and as said map
applies to approximately 109.102 acre of land as
s shown this date on the official tax map of the City
of Denton, Texas► and more particularly described ~f
therein and deelariny an effective date. (2-14451
llober►: Nickerson) 1
B. Approval of an ordinance amending the zoning map of
4
th,y City of Denton, Texas, as same was adopted as an
appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Dontcn, Texas, by Ordinance No. 69-1, and as said map
applles to approxi.._tely 0.53561 acre of land as a
° shown this date on the official tax map of the City
and more particularly described M
of 'Denton, Texas,
thv?.A nl and declaring an effective date. (L-14431 V
Chat ie.i P. Mulkey)
C, Approval of an ordinance amending Section 1704 of the ,
i 1976 Uniform Building Code adopted by Section 5-14 of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton by
arterading Section 1704 to provide that f
coverings shall be fire-retardant and prohibiting
?awood shingles and shakes.,
t
~a
. _........,.......,..w.....m.~x..«ca+o.Y.waoal+a+.R+F,~,1kW~M~I~II~'A'r•
or r,_
I
I
City Council Agenda
May 6, 1980
Page Three
I 12. Resolutions
A. Approval of a resolution approving plans from North
I Texas State University for the Welch Street Drainage
Project,
13. Approval of and authorization for the City Manager to sign
the Contract for the Library Expansion.
14. Awarding Contract for a 1980 Electric Rate Study.
15. Awarding Bids for construction of Wastewater Treatment
Plant.
16. Awarding Bids for Pecan Creek Outfall Line and Audra Lane
Collection Lines.
17. Approval of payment to Golden Triangle Industrial. Park for
over depth paving on Morse Street.
18. Acceptance of the EPA Step II Grant Agreement/Amendment
j' for Engineering Services for New Interceptor Sewer Linea.
1 i
19. Approval of final payment to First Texas Savings
Association of Fort Worth for Participation agreement in
„ Kingston Trace Additions 11 & IV. (Public Utility Board
'i recommends approval.)
20. Approval of final payment to Dickerson Construction Co.
for Stuart Road Sewer Line & Water Linea on Stanley,
Thomas, Bellemeade and Mimosa Streets, (Public Utility
n:+ Board recommends approval.)
I.". 21, Appointment of a chairman for the Local United Nations Da
Y
Program.
J
22. Approval of a contract with the Denton Boy's Baseball,
Inc. for umpire services for all Boy's Youth League
baseball games. (The Parks & Recreation Board recommends
approval.; 1
23. Consent Agenda.
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
x Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement
each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations.
F
i
1
City Council Agenda
May 6, 19NC
Page Four
A. Bide/Purchase Orders.
1, Bid #8768 Water Meters
2. Bid #8757 Radio Towers
3. Bid #8759 Water Main Replacement
4. Bid #8770 Utility Truck Bodirs
B, Plats
1. Approval of the final plat of Laurel Addition.
(planning S zoning recommends approval.)
24 Executive Session3 +
j A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A,T,S,
B. Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-1? V.A,T.S,
C, Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art, 6252-17 V,A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments - Under See. 2(g), Art. 6256-17 {
V,A.T.S.
25. Approval of Board Appointments
(
f
t
Y 1
yyq "
1F
tY
9
i
ti
r
i
I ( City Council j
April 17, 1980
Regular :!acting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, Tuesday, April
15, 1980 at 7100 p.m. In the Council Chamber of the bruaiaipal building.
PPISM, Mayor Rash, Mayor Pro Tom Stephens, Member Ransleyl City Manager Chris
' Sartug, City Attorney C. J. Taylor and City Secretary Brooks fdlt.
Council Member Vila joinol the Council later in the meeting.
ABSOT, Council Member Stewart.
1. Motion vat matt by Stephens, seconded by Ronsloy that the minutes of
the Regular Meeting of March 29, 1980, the Regular Meeting of April 1, 1980 and
the Spacial Called Meeting of April S, 1980 be approval. Motion carried,
2. PUBLIC UOINO: y
i
(A) A public haaring was held on Z-1647, the petition of Mr. Cbvlis
P. Mulkey, r:questing a change of coning from Single Family (SP-7) to Oeneral
Wall (OB} oning el:'sification on it treat approximately acres in site, j
The property begins at the southeast corner of the intersection of Cleveland
Street and Ggle Drive and exte043 eastvard alomi the south side of Eagle Drive
I j for a distance of approximately 230 feet.
I, Mayor lath o fined the hen ~
{ J but none in opposition, D ring, Two spoke is tarot of the petition
Charles Mulkey advised iYA be planned to build a first elus car 1
vash with 10 bays. }
± Mgror Nuh elated sae hearids,
City Planner John Lavrttta advised that publio facilities are avail.
able at the site Lad that the planning and toning Commission coasiders the fact
that the props to retail sons would adjoin 0020 of the houtss on Cleveland Street.
The Cammisei^I feels that a retell use would have limited impact on the nNghbdr-
F hood.
.
Motion war muds !y Nensley, seconded by Stephens that the petition
be approv14, Motion carried.
3. Tae Council considered awarding We on the Library oxpaatioc.
Ik 3' Dvayae Laadry, ;rehltect for the tibrary expanslan, advised that he
had visited several building of different typos that son built by the 10"
bidders. Ba advised that a ouildor nust build aceordlog to the building specs
because the architect does not supervise as a coottnuous basis. l
Motion was made by Nasli, seconded by Renrley, to avird the bid to the i
lowest bidder, Contract Builders, at a low bid of $807,866. Motion aarri
Mr. Landry advised that the construction cost plus other project costs 7.
are wall within NMS available.
6. ORDINANCCS, ~ ~
(A) The Council conotdfrcd instituting annuattoo proa0edlcgs
v concerning the petition of Mr. Jack Brown Lad Mr. Neil Bill, Stneral partner,
DunaOa Properties W., an a 6.33 sore tract vbich begins approximately 700 teat
'.4 souttaast of the intersection of Colorado boulevard and Loop 258.
The folloviag annesttion ordinwo vas introduced before the Couneili
AN ORDINAUCI AMINO A TRACT OF LAUD COMOUOUS AND ADJACENT TO TIN CITY or
r DWON, TMI 111" ALL THAT LOP, TPACT CA PAACIL Of I M C081ITINO CP APPAM-
STATE Of TVA8 Al ItIUO LAn TRZ D. WOUT MnYY,, AISNTR~LCT CN10 Pt84 DONCOUifPy,
4t TLvASs CLASSIPYTNO TIS IAMB AS A"RSQl1.TPAL "A" DISTRICT PRCPZRTYI AND DZCtA)4'NJ
AS t?nCTYVe DATT. }
Motion was made by Stephens, secandod by Nensley, to institute annex-
ation procsedings. On roll call vote Haasloy "aye", Itapheas "aye" •.ad Naeb
r aye Mottoo carried. "
8Fj`
a
,.:.rPeeas~eu,t~c-
. r.aa can. nr.....:. ...r . ~.......-n' w ixs,a-,.I.ar.rV-^'40KY1'!LYwf
~~m 6
rr ~ ,
I
J
I
April 18, 1980 Continued
I (B) The following Ordinance was praseatedt
ORDINANCE /80•)7
AN ')RDINANCI OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEAS, AF1fOVIg6 AAAKIAO OA THE OOUTR SIDE
OP CREBPAOVIDfAOTNUIAOPBETVREPEALELR AYaPOIUECOAAELTCTINOAND AVENUE DiCRDPYARCE9PBOVTDINOS
OA ATSSETHEREVEAABCPItUTY CLAUSE;
PA
PAOYIDIN6
PENALTIES; PAOVIDIAO PR PUELTCATI03 A.'M DECIAAINO AN EPPEOTIVE DATE,
Motion wan made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley that the Ordinance
be passed. On roll call vote Heasley "aye", Stepheae "aye" and Aasb "aye", s,
Motion carried,
The Council vas to Consider discussion regarding location of electric
meters.
I Motion was made by Reneley, seconded by Stephens that the matter be
removed. Motion carried.
I 6. The Council was to consider final payment on the McCormick Street {
Drainage Project.
motion vas made by Stephens, seconded by Heasley that tea ratter be
)
tabled. Motion carried.
1
a T. The muncil considered axtrndiag the contract with :mee Construction
Company for the Bonnie Eras improvement Project.
a
Pick Bvebla briefed the Couaeil, advising that Jegee Construction
Company has experienced delays because of utility relocation problems from the
gas and ulsphoae companies. Re stated that the Staff has revisited theme delays
and feels that the 48 day extension is reasonable.
Motion via made by Stephens, seconded by Reomley to approve A kd day 7
extension on the contract vttb :ago* Construction Ccmpauy for the Bonnie Brae
tmprovement ProJeot. Motion carried.
9. The Council considered adopting a Crisis Relocation Plan for Civil I
Deteaee purposes,
Jobn Maxwell, City/County Civil Defense Director, briefed the Council
relative to the matter. Maxwell advised tbat such A plain woulA go into affect
only alter a three day varmfag is aliowtd. tb that warning period Denton
County would take 90,000 Dallas residents. me added that speeffia plans iasluds e
q.r initial registraties at the new mall and I= football foil, So stated that an
evalustion of buildings vith fall out Capabilities indicate that there are enough a
beildings to take care of the entire Denton County populatlea, but additional
measures would be necessary for population from Dallas County.
g
J Motion use mode by Aash, ascood b by Stephens to approve the emergency
plans. Motion carried.
7i
9. The Council ws to consider a centred 141h the Denton Boy's Baseball, t'
fac, for umpire services for all Boy's Youth League baseball games,
The City Manager stated that this item should to deleted. The Council
Concurred.
' 10. The Council set the April 22, 1980 Study stWon Agenda.
t:
M M:
ass
April 13, 190O Ccctinued
11. The Cauacil recessed into Lkeoutive Cession to discuss legal matters,
{ real state, personael and board appointments.
17. The Council recoaventi into Public Session to take the folloving action,
(A) WRIC NWrYlss
(L) A public hearing was held on L-1441, the petition of Mies
Karst, gash, requesting an amendment to a planxad develupaoot (PD) for detached
single family housing on LS foot x 100 loot lots, to permit multi family
restricted (MP-P) development on a tract approximately 7 acres in slat, n*
Property is located an the north side of the prgcsad Windsor extension, and
approximately 175 feet vest of Stuart Paid.
Mayor Pro Tom Stephens took the chair since Mayor Pash is involved
with engineering work on the petition.
The hearing was opened, but ao one spoke, to the hearing was alojed.
Motion vu made by Vela, secoaded by Nmsley to refer the petition
back to the Planning sad toning Commission. Motion carried with flash abstaining.
(Z) A public hearieg was held on t-1445, tte petition of Mr.
Potert lickorson, eequssting an amendment to a planned development (PD). The
planed development begins at thv southeast corner of the intersection of State
School Pead and Interstate 355. The original planned development permitted
.I ' co=er*ILI, shopping and two-story garden apartment uses. The amendment proposes
office, multi family, restaurant, theater, retail shopping, hotel and reeresticaal
uses on approximately 90 acres.
Mayor Pro Tom Stephens took the their since Mayor gash is laoolvod
with sagineering work on the petition.
The tearing vu opened, but no one spoke, to the hearing was closed,
y City Planner John Lavrotta advised that the over all dnelapcent
ti. of this plonaed development includes roughly 1$0 acres, halt inside Donton and
half inside Corinth. The Planning and Zoning 0=1181ca retie that the major
advantage of the proposed amendment is the widening of the State Sebool Food,
which was not a provision of the original planned development. Part or the
y~) large plaeaed developtent was originally mooed in 1977. The Planning and Loping 1
CoaalWon rocoaaendm approval.
Vela sake/ about school provislons for such a large population.
`i Larretta Ldvtsod that thorn ware no provisions at present.
Lil Volt caked where the children would go to school.
i
Lavretts advised tbat they would probably go to the proposed
school as Teasley Lane.
Volt, asked about fire protection.
41 Lavretts advit" that the stations on tut MaKinasy $treat Lad
McCormick Street will We care of this.
w ~w
' e Motion vu made by Peaaley, seconded by Sttptens to approve the
petition. Motion carried vith )<ssh abstaining.
(2) CONSENT AOECAi
Notion vas muds :y Styhens, secendtd by i{enaIey that the toliavlag
consent agoads to approved with the final plat of the Dougherty Additioo rsmorad.
Motion earrW. -
t}
(11 ruT9i ;
1 final replat of the Paul Remilton Addition approved rlth flash
abstaining, s
r
A~~f I
i
r` +
ese~
huff April 1.4, 1980 Continued
il. The Coemcil oomslde•ed final plat of the Daugherty Addition.
City Planner John lavretta advised that the developer seeks to play
two lots which do not front on a public street. The Planning and Zoning Ccam.
fission recommends approval of the final plat with the deletion of the requires
meat for oxteasion of a 6" water line.
Vole asked 6avretta for his opinion of this matter.
I
tavretta stated that thr eater line ahonld be extended for safety
purposes and not with grant moem, i a later date.
Motion was made by Nenaleye seconded by Vela to approve the final Piet
of the Daugherty Addition with th-v recommendation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission to delete the b" water line. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 900 p s•
i
f E ItAY09
I ' !I '
f ak
CITY 8ICTMAHT
I e a e
v+
MAP
h
,
1Y
P~
I 1 a;
^.r.+....~.~~rr.........,.._. .....,........,.v.a...........w..»+«.....«.w.rr ma.e,wx. weuar+,wmw:rtr.eFAr'rAN'Hr2~wIrMYYM4tiMO~.
I a
City Council 407
April 22, 1990
I Spacial Called Meeting or the City Council of the City of Denton, Taxed, Tuesday,
April 22, 1950 at TfOO p.m. to the Council Chamber of the Mualotpol Building.
P MSffi5:, Mayor Mash, Mayor Pro Ton Stephens, Members Stewart and Valli City
Manager Chris lartuag, City Attorney C. J. Taylor and City Secretary
Brooks Bolt.
ABSLVfi Council Member 'Insley.
1. The Council cansidered proposals on the amployee life insurance
program.
- The City Naga or advised that Life Usrracce Company at North America
has proyosed a rate of 25 for life insurance and 1.06 for AOLD (total 1.31
11,000). That is a stgatficaat drop from Life of the Southwest's rate of 1.18
41,000 for We insurance and 1.054 for AD 1D (total of 4.434 11,000) and would
result So 'a grass savings of approximately 115,000.00. Movevar, with Life of
the SCuth:•est's 12,000.00 increase in stop-loss tasurana for next ysrr, the
not savings for fY 198041 would be approximately 113,000.00.
M Matson VMS Made by Btepheoe, seconded by Vela to approve the bid of
Life lasarsaae Capany of Borth America and autbortss the City Manager to sign.
Motion carried.
Q 21 The Council considered discussion on Vowing finance Corporation
Q Mortgage Demand Study.
The City Manager called attentioa.to a letter from the County Coca.
Litton, edvislag that the Court has organised a Deatoa County Eousi Finance
Corporatioa for funding mortgagod pursuant to provisions of 1. 3. 1176.
8artung adviad that it the deadline of April 24, 1979 is in affect, aeither
County nor City could issue bonds. go added that it vu not elter, at all whether
the City den Lasne Municipal aOitgage boodol a mortgage stuffy must be made.
f ~
Council Member Stewart said, "i favor gout abead with our program",
f Motion vu made by Stewart, aeeoaded by Vala that the City Manager
respond to the County in such a fashion that ve intend to issue our ova bonds.
Motion carried.
3. ORDIEASCE33
(A) The folloving Ordinance vas pressattde i
ordinance 180-3~
AM ORDIRAMCE AMEMDZBO CIA;TM 26, ARTICLE IV, StCTZOM 26-5! Of TO OMTOM OWN
OF ORDIMARES, AS AMLMDED, PROVID1110 FOR TU IMSTAtUTICE Of UrDttMI
PRIA"UZEO rm TBE INSTALLATION Of TA%rawst PROVIDIMO FOR UM TO BE CSAROBD
' BY : IABSi PROVIDW FOR llffn BZLZTS'j AND, DZCLARIEO AN tFf OTT4E DATE.
Motion via made by Vela Seconded by Stephens that the Ordinance
be passed. On roll c+11 rots Vela-Ssye", stepbens "aye"l Stevan "aye" and
Sash "aye". Motion carried.
I (B) The Council considered adopting as drd"arme amending Intioa
1T04 of the 190 Vniform Building We adopted by Ention 5-14 at the Code of
( Ordinaacss of the City of Denton by was,1104 Station 1104 to provide that all
roof deverisgs shall be firs-retardant and probibiting vaod shingles ace shales.
lick Bvohla advised that there were several Queettoot raised on the
vurdiag of the prior ordinance that vu passed in order to eliminate any doutt
u to the Couaeil'a Intentions. Ve vould recommend this amendment which spooi-
fically eliminates all wood shingle construction. ,
Vale stated that be %vuld vote against the ordinance it it dots not
asmpt individual bomu.
Matt= vas made by Sash asconded by Stophams to table the matter.
Motion carried with Stewart abotain~ag.
` 40S , April 22, 1980 Coat!aued
fM b, MOIUTIOSS
The follovind Resolution providing for a temporary street otosing
as Try Street betveem Rick ory aa: Oak between the hours of 9:00 a.m. cad ?too
p.m. for Sunday, April 27, 1980 as requested by Sigma Alpha Mu rrateralty was
preseatedt
Ata0LUT10~
i
WRPMM, on Sunday, April 27, 1980s the Sigma Alpha Mu Tratermity to spocsoriag
as Art Festival to be held on Try Street between the intersection of Oak and
Rdckoryt Lad
W$tf,RA9, the Art Festival is open to the gager" public of the City and County
of remtoml cad
I WSR.1W, in order to provide 94,1gaate spas for the said Testival Lad is order
to protect the safety of eititeas vho attend, the City OaumCil of the City of
Doatom dens it to asa+ssery to temporarily close a portion of Try Streit
batveea Oak Strost and Rickary Street trop the hours of 9:00 a.m. umt11. 700 p.m.
an April 27, 1980.
SOW, TIMN70FC, Lt IT RCSOMD BY TIM CITY C=CIL Cr TRR CITY OT On". Tvwj
TRATs._
4 That fry Street between Oak Strait Lad Hickory Meet
nd shall to temporarily
closed as a street or public thoroughfare of any kind or character whatever do
April 27, 1980 from 9:00 a.m. until ?too p.m. for the paposa of bolding the
Sigu Alpha Nei Art Teetltal.
sac~~oa II. , ;
That tba portion of the above described street shall revert back !e the City
for marts" traffic activity immediately from and after 7100 p.m. on April 27,
'r 1
1980. I
MON M.
That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force Lad effect from and
attar the date of its pusaga and approval.
t' MiSID AND AMOM TITS the 22ad day of April, A.D. 1980.
BILL, BASSO YOR
I ti A17KSTt CM OF Dams, TR9tU
" BROOKS BOLT, CI SRCRFLUN
~ CITY C• Qk1rMN, T17W
i,
AtFROM AS TO MAL P201
C. J. TAYLOR, d'R„ CITY AT2b =
';•a j CITY Or DzvwsI T"
I
Xotion as made by Stephens, wooded by Yale that the Resolution be
leased. On roll call vote fteart "aye", Yale "aye", Stephens "aye" Led wash
aye". Motinm carried.
s
S. The Couaail cansidered final payment to Denton Construction Campaar
for the MaCoomick Streit Drainage Trnlaot,
Rick frshia stated that Denton Coastruction has seat a letter dated
April 9 indicating that they should tot pay any penalty. to fact that' feel they
should be reimbursed for more money. The haft reeo®ands that the total retain-
' age of !11,948.99 be retained by the City eiaca the penalty days an. the ooatrat
amount to more tbea that. Mr. Thomaca has cover submitted a sAlateaenas band,
although requested by the City.
ta,a a~
1
April 22, 1)60 Continued 400
Denton Attorney, George Preston, raprueotirj Mr. Thomuon, rocommeeded
that the Counall boaor the contract, bad voathsr and other conditions preventing
them from completing the project door.". Preston said thr penalty clause was
ragne add not antcraeable in court. to said "You should consider as ■ Council
the less than salutary fall out eoeuQueaces In treating a local aaetrutoT is
such a fubloa. It could hurt the City much more than the 120,000 Mr. Thomesoa
is asking."
I
City Manager lartuag said, "A contractor has the responsibility to
notify the ovaor of coed for extra work or for delays."
treble. stated that the staff recommends that the City retain 111,946.99
and adopt the July, 19T9 payment as the final payment.
Motion was made by Yeah that total paymeot to Deatca Construction
Company be made without penalty.
Motion ¢W for lack of a second.
4 Motion vac then made by Yal4 e seconded br Stewart to approve recamm•
satiation. of the start to retain 111,9.99. Matico carried 3 to 1.
M 6. The Council considered r01tising the Council's atteddanaa at the
American Public Power Association's l..nuai Meeting in Washington.
W ' Alter a short discussion, motion was made by Stewart, seeandad ty
Q Stop-nods to not authorise the Council's attendance at the American Public Paver
a Q Ajuolatiao's annual mating in Washington, but to authorize attooquot for
TWA Daard M Cabers. Motion carried.
T• Myer Yeah sold he enjoyed serving on the Council, to vished all
I members of the Council well. Ile was given a steaSiat ovation as he shook hands
with Council members cad the staff. to said he hoped the lister Cities Program
will continue,
! 8. The City Secretary administered the oath of office to Mayo: HOW
0. Stewart Lad Council Member 1. 11. Tslisfarro. They took their meats an the
Council. both men ware banared by the presence of their respective familiu,
Including grandahildran, large ud mall,
9• The folloving Resolution was pruuttds
TEE IT= Or T= ~ Rf-0 =ff 131 APPRTC=0W of
0MIM of DO M11 1= CASE
CITY Of DONE
WhOWO Bill Sub his awed the aitlsus of the City of Denton u a member of
{the City Council for four yursl and
i
Wttl W, Bill Seib bad served as Mayor of the City of Deotaa for the put yarl
" E Cad -
WEWAl, bill Pub bas contributed bid time and effort u Mayor and a Member j
of the. City Couaail is a public service to the aitiseu of the City of Dentool
env, therefore,
SE IT RDBOLTO BY Tgl MAYOR AID CITY COUNCft OP TEN CITY OP DDTOt, MASt
4De Mayof and City Council of the City of Cemtan acting on behalf of the aitimus
of the City of Dantom vishu to sordid to Sill lash the appreatatien of the
r attisue of tilt city of canton far big serdae u MWt cad u a Member of the
City Caunoil.
ttCTf01 If,
4 The Mayor Lad City Caudell direct enl order that this Resolution be milt apart
of the official sloutu of this Council to be a permanent ruerd of the Oily,
' and that a co;y of this Resolution be forwarded to bill, tub as a token of our
approoiation. f
SS~i
I'
i
i
13
i 4 ] 0 April 22, 1980 Continued
PASBCD AND APPACTM We the 2214 day of April, 1980.
A"
MUM CITY or DmoS, TEXAS
MOCKS SOLT, CITY SSC,tETAAY '
CITY Cr DSRTOA, TEXAS
APPPO= AS TO LEOAL PORM1
C. J. TAII.OS, JR., CITY ATTCRM
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
Motion was made by Stewart, seconded by atalhans chat the Assoluttnn
be paced. Cn roll call vote Tdtaferro "aye", Vela ye", Stephams "ye" and
Stavart aye. Motion carried.
10. The Council recessed into EYecatiwe Session at 8:00 ;.a. to discuss •1
.1.41!4 matter, real._estate, parsoanel Lad board appointments.
it. The Council reeenweaed into public session at 8125 p.m. 1
fwtior was made by Vela, secoaded by Taliaferro to appoint Ayr Stephan&
as a nom,^a tram the City of Dentoa to the Nomination Cosaittee of Borth Ceatral
Taxes Council f Ocrermmeats for swrice on the Sxomiwe Committes. Motion
carried.
1
Meetim adjourned at GOT p.A, if
KAU
CMT Y
f 1 rr
~1 r
S j
4 f f
~a
~f
ti` k ~I
Ile
, I J1 /
S AA l
K#'
i
I
I
I
I
N0.
AV ORDINANCE CANVASSING THE RBTU1.'1S AND DECLARING THE RESULTS
OF THE MUNICIPAL RUN-OFF ELECTIOS FIELD IN TH8 CITY OF DENTON ON
APRIL 2p, 1980.
THE COUNCIL OF THo CITY OF DENTON, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION.].
The City Council finds and declares that the April 29,
1980 municipal run-off election was duly ordered for the
3 r.':poso of electing councllpersons to Place ! and 6, on the
E Council; that proper notice of said election was duly given and
I election official appointed; that said election was duly held
and the returns of the election officials have beer, delivered
to the Council, all in accordance with the laws of the State of
Texas and the Charter and ordinances of the City of Denton.
SECTION it.
The official returns of the election officials having been
opened, exaalned ani canvassed, the Council hereby finds and
declares that 2,815 votes were cast at said election, and that
f{ the votes cost for each place on the Council word as follows:
~•a FOR CITY COUNCIL PLACE 4:
Charles Hopkins 1631 votes
.1123 votes
Bob Warts,
.y
1 FOR CITY-COUNCII, PLACE at
11;` Dwight L. Galley .................lsll votes
Linnis )6dams............a......1261 Yetis.
^'4
14
SECTION [It.
The Council finds and declares that each candidate listed
i
below received a majority of the votes tut for each place on
Y,,4 the Council and that each candidate listed below is hereby
i
~i. declared to be elected to the City Council of the City of
Dcnton:
PLACE !•Owight L. Galley
" PLACE 6-Charles Hopkins
d" and such candidates shall assume the duties of their office on
Mly 6, 1980.
I
s
i
I
Tj
■l
I '
a'al
f
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
~ 1980.
RICIMB 0. STET
CITY OF DENTON, TE1U S
!!I ATTEST:
f
BROOKS Ho TXR'Y
CITY OF D9T0N, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK,
C, J. TAYLOR JR. CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENT6N, HXAS
i
DY:
o:;Y ti
y ~
4s~
i
pi
yt
t I
i
j,q
I
L
"S!
i
Itr5m ITYt U Cvruulivs jIMEM-F
, .
RUN-Orr ELECTION OF TIIS
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS I94j&Cf 1
April 29 1900 77
VONM y01M4 •VVIVIALWIS f]Ii In foal TO It
1`0117 4 "V1 Q'4 CAP 11MV43
.
k
1 PRECINCT 00 1
1
!ALLOTS CAST 2626
FOR CITY COUl1C [L-Plana 6 12-yr. to rml '
Dwight L. Gailay003 006 1408 54 IS 1
Llnnla IatAdams 00/ 007 1 %as 45 17
FOR CISY[OURC M-Place 11-vt[etm)1Place4 11-vt[etm)I !
v Charles No klns 012 1 012 1499 SB .4 1
I Bob Worts 014 014 1069 41 .6 +
i
001
l 1r
Ir ' ; 2.
♦ 2628
• 2811
00
1
r
3
nr
■
w l~
I
I+~r A V I V 1\ C J V L I J ►•o•._L_.11.~1,i:~r „
' ulu w,
RIYORl IYYL U CV-U\A IIYt )Ur41
RUN-orr ELECTION Of TIIX
y
r _ _ _
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS wsr+^~,+
A rll ]9 S
' Iol 04 ra+va voll 1~LLON rptlMACf t0 1/
IMIf10r1 PWif4W W1 I~IUI>
PRECINCT 1111
007 I
EALLOTS CAST I 187 '
[OR CITY COUNCIL•Pl11rt 6 []-ys.l~sal
_ .DvloAt L._Ga11w 0a5 005 110 59 0 1
Llnnia McAdams 007 007 76 40 69 I
TOR CITY COUNCIL•Pl~a1,~1-vr..lS tat f
Ctlarlu HooklnP -213 012 177 71 .0 1 i
Bob LirOrt• rid 014 54 29 YO I
♦ 197
II R , 1a7
00
c4;
1
i
i
~ a
1 t ntivu++.atro~r NFr: V CUM MA11Yr "fMKlhCr--- ~•:a~•
51111 ! r C ..'t ro?,`:'. -
Rgt1-orr ELECTION Of
CITY Or DENTON# TEXAS 1/1JRL O1Y1tJG,r¢•77v+~
oWZ
r! 1 79 1990 vorvo wru a vorrvr.uefs to ar 1
{ rounw roaraa an •autireu - rucno
PRECINCT 2 1
!ALLOTS CAST 8 1 S -
-rOR CITY GOt7 tiC 21-?Lac* a 17-yr.terml ...r.-- '
L•v17Rt t. 4atin• 005 009 1510 54 .6 !
Llrnnle NeAdams 007 001 12d 1 45 .4
- M CITY C0~111QIL-lace 4 (1-vr.tarm)1 r ,
CRariss BHI Is 017 0 1 2 1 6 3 1 99 .2 1
- mob Larort• 014 0 14 1123 4 0 .B I
00
I
1
+1p j
r
es
4.
1
1
On
w
h
rs .
1 br
Vapor o! tbt 00 of unions Im=t
i
' TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME:
WHEREAS, the North Texas State University School of Music is ono
l1 of the finest In the nation; and
f WHEREAS, the North Team State University Schoot of M„-!r, to an
important part of the city of Denton; and
WHEREAS, the tuba-euphordurn division of North Texas State
University School of Mule Is one of the finest In the
I nation and is worthy of exceptional community support;
and
WHEREAS, the North Texas State University and the Tubtsts
Universal Brotherhood Assoctatlon will co-sponsor the
Second National Tuba-Euphonium Symposium Wa-kftp
an May 19 through May it, 1990; and
WHEREAS, this Tuba-Euphonium Sympostum Workshop wRl be the
largest of Its type to take place;
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Richard 0. Stewart, Mcyar of the City of Denton,
Texas, do hereby declare and proclaim the week of dlay
19 through May 7F, 1990, ai,
"TUBA-EUPHONIUM WEEK"
i
j In the City of Denton, Texas, and urge all citttens to
recognise this dtvtsian of the North Texas State i
University School of Mute.
Mf I
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 1 have
,j horeunto set m hand oM caused the
OfltNoi Sfat Oil
the City of Denton
Texas, to be affixed this the 9th day
of May, A. D, t990.
} CITY Of OENTON, YEAS
ArrESrr
CITY OF DENrom, rdxAs
I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
yE C, J. TAYLOR, JR., CfiY ATTORNEY
k CIT4' OF DENTON, TEXAS
9Y;
ty
x
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1446
May 6, 1980
Ide"tity and Location: Z-1446
This is the petition of Mr. Charles Glasgow requesting three zoning changes on
a parcel approximately 26.4 acres in size which begins at the southwest corner
of the intersection of Loop 288 and Audra Lane. The petitioner requests the
following: (1) a change of zoning from Agricultural (A) to Commercial (C)
classification on approximately 11.3 acres; (2) a change of zoning from Agri-
cultural (A) to Office (0) classification on approximately 2.2 acres; and (3)
a change of zoning from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) for multi
family use un approximately 10.1 acres.
Background:
The petitioner originally proposed Commercial (C) zoning classification on the
entire tract which was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The
petitioner resubmitted tlie'petition requesting three zoning changes as follows:
~1 Agricultural A to Commercial (C), (2) Agricultural (A) to Office (0),
3; Agricultural ~A to Multi Family (MF-1. However, the petitioner modified
No. 3 at the outset of the Planning and Zoning public hearing to 9 P 9 Planned Development
for multi family use.
Report:
Adjacent land use includes the Denton Development Center to the south and east,
DID Gun Shop and a sin;ile family house to the east across Loop 288, a single family
house near the corner of Audra Lane and Loop 288 on the east side of Loop 288,
and vacant land to the north and west. Agricultural (A) zoning is found on the
north, south and west of the site with a large tract zoned single family SF-10) 1
to the east and a General Retail (GR) zone is on the east side of Loop 288 3t +
Its intersection with Audra Lane. A strip Commercial (C) zone is located on the
1 east side of Loop 288 north of Audra Lane. (Note: The accompanying aerial photo-
graph shows a house north of the site, the house and other buildings no longer
exist at this location.)
The Comprehensive Plan designates a strip about 400 feet wide along the west side
of Loop 288 at this site for multi family development with the remainder of the
property in this request for single family residential use.
With respect to public facilities; the city has now advertised for bids to install
a sewer sine on Audra Lane where this property would need to be served from. A '
water line would need to be extended aLlout 1500 feet on Audra Lane to serve the
property with water. Electrical service is available for extension to the site
,4 r
and there will be adequate capacity in all the lines to serve the property.
The proposed commercial zone is approximately 161 feet deep and extends southward
along loop 288 from Audra lane about 700 feel,. The 2.2 acre office site forms
a buffer between the commercial zone and the Denton Development Center with the
multi family use west of the Development Center and west of the commercial zone.
71
E
age Two
The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that this was a suitable request in that
a buffer is being established between the proposed commercial zone and the Dent)n
Development Center. The Planning Commission also felt that the planned development
I (PD) for multi family use should se used to form a transition between the
f commercial zone and the land along the western perimete of the site and that when
the Commission and Council review the site plan particular attention should be
given to providing a good transition to the west. For these reasons the Planning
and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of Z-1446 with the following
conditions for the planned development portion of the petition:
1 The density of the development shall be limited to 25 units per acre.
2 A 6 foot solid fence shalt be constructed along the western boundary,
3 The maximum height of the apartment buildings shall be two-stories.
4 Site plan apprval by the Planning Commission and City Council is
required befor'e' development may commence.
4;F
I
I&
I,•
r
i
f
I
,10
1.l 1 f. .
17
`l 4Y''T
t y .N a-' rt 1 W,r 1 y M d ~ .(LIR'A' .M t~ 1 1
t.
r;. i~;~•'t dq}h'~ Rw al.w °a' d,x 1 11 Syr lv~r ItF.'e
.r~ R aii$~ aS, ' 1!4rA 4' d ~ t 1 a ~l i l.'>y a a'". p:. r c~ ♦ ,rf
41
` ~ ~ x `"x S~~A'~ id y. d'~~ .y} ~,r t• td~/ r r ~ s ' r't " ~ r R ry
Jy ,4 . M~ , ♦ .r. y ,},r ♦ t5 t r r dq 4 ti i
i I ' H , I'' ♦ 'SR" a Y ht } r i •'l 'p( IQ
1 1'n~ 1 1 S'^ r M 11 ~T ~d t' x e dt ,y rl V- A'1
i ~.t.~ • S; 5 i. I 'f R i Js
♦ 'T'.R"r
* `
'ti 1 e~{~p$! r } r.. d r'S ti~~'~~ f r re~r;a ^ ~ 1
• , y~ 'G . E~y~~f.tf} f~fi17 .ytie f~ i
s
I ♦..ya ~1" '.art M~ ,j. ~ 7 r hl.~ t >~1~ .p ~b~~ 4 7 ~ 1
w' y:
! ♦ 1
, t r'yW~ 1 ny i t +~~~~:✓p. i wa •1 t~
_ F
'it JC y... 1 'T~t 4x. t t -~~y+ x~r~j'~~F f a IfF w ~.~k
.~4x~ ~fh._ ~}F~j~ ~I.r 'y .t ~t '~a x' ~ i 3 rE ~t yI, ..3
' y yPi~y:
l;.tr! r as}~1'p 1,•Pt f ' • trey +'(,rir it r 1 ~1`;,k t»' d
r Y'^~;~7 IYI.• "1 xr X" r r x fr i' ,.I ly r, 1
T i•a~. 1.}, l 1` 2 T.~
~ ~ ~ }r 7~t }C t ' kdy a `.M'1 i r Y t1~ * } ~ r~R~= ` x P
t , A 1T 1 rt +t
6R 1 4 1~ 1 ~ 1' ~r 1
t i'. ~((c1 1 V ?I' hti ~a 1 R R r` r r ~lr~' " r~My
~
_ ~ t'r ` ~ ~ ~ ~ r r! rf s♦ t~_~ T~ i y, i ~ 1 ~'~~~1 wt~ ~ 4~ ~ ~~r ~ , 1 Yr ~ C.' a w
r~ y.w ~ E~ir a+ r
j `R' }V. ± ! T~, sT .1+!• 'y .I t^ y' t } r,` Irt!~~,y ±
0 0,
4r' al K' IIII 4 ► 9 -r
r 3' 11 a .I fr r >!x i 1 r ~ s`. ~ ~ l(S p yt r
Lk~
...1 "1 rr F. i }r
OT,
r .~dwr+yry Tffr 1 Jaf" YH~~h ~`dy ~J Fa ' 1 '
{ tr X t Ry r i'git'F,~L r' ~rali 5 R '+t, 1 y
' y•. ye a t''rC dr' ` r s. r p ~ ~~11
1{~ ' f t. },.y r~r i ny,
w1KA pW i Manyy r C~. r~ ♦ a~,
.a 1. t~3~•1 f~ ~ ~ t }f .1 e,+~'. p'. ' a..Y' v°.'i ~ 1' fi: 1,..;
S-Y" 1 t r rp r.'
MI,
III
i~
71
I~ PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
Z-1446
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Mr. GassawaY
P.O. Box 637
Denton, Texas 76201
J. Newton Rayzor
1204 W. University
Oenton, Tx 16201
i
Y
pr Y~
1
e«^~!` III
REFLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Case No. Z-1446
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if ,
they wish. If 20% or more of the propsrty owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the Citp
Council. moat attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
- - Pleasa use BLACK ink only.
y' R22LY R CC!'~~0 HA 11 2 1980
I ant in favor of this zoning request.
" ( ) I am opposed to this zoning request,
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows:.
1
1.,
riZo +
4
A
J.11QW -w+ Rc. zc:,^ ' 3ignc~ture \ r \1 A~
W Uj15 r
t -I() LA
vo(i . Address
,y-
t
' 6ihl
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Case. No. Z-1446
V ,
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning ppetition.
by this re y
If ou urn it s to e the following naddressopinion,
publicphearing.and
ret
II City Planner
Municipal Building
i 215 East McKinney
h Denton, Texas 76201
If 20% or more of the property ownors receiving this notice return a
reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply
form for consideration by the Planningg and Zoning Commission, those com-
ments are a sufficient response and wi11 be presented to the City Council
if your opinion about the case has changed you are encouraged to use
this form to notifp us concerning your position.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
Please use BLACK ink only, since blue ink cannot be xeroxed. F0
REPLY
(x) I am in favor of this zoning request.
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request. ~J
( ) I am undecided about this zoninS request.
~ r
My comments are as followsr
1w9
k'
Of
d
i
z
7i
w' signature u- :±+„~,,II' ytiP
Address
-2- -
Phoue
I,~ ~,•1„ .
y r ~ '
t
v k, 7 F,•r+ vAo d5 -
V 0 gay 4. 6u4
J
41 e,
v
. i, n=om f~ Je
LP '1 9 G'„ ' , 41 A F n~'yi
- - - - - - - - - - - -
1,4
ea 2S,
i,
r ~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 2, 1980
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on April 21
19809 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Bill Brady, Marilyn Gilchrist, Robert LaForte, Linnie McAdams,
Carol Busby, Andy Sidor, and Richard Taliaferro. Staff members
were John Lavretta, Charles Watkins, Greg Edwards, and Sue Wigand.
ABSENT: None.
Linnie McAdams called the meeting to order.
1. Approve the minutes of March 19, 1980 meeting.
Motion was made by Bill Brady and seconded by Andy Sidor to approve the
minutes of the March 19, 1980 meeting. Motion carried unanimoisly.
11. Public Hearing:
A. Z-1446. This is the petition of Mr. Charles Glasgow requesting three
zoning changes on a parcel approximately 26.4 acres in size which begins
at the southwest corner of the intersection of loop 288 and Audra Lane.
The petitioner requests the following: (1) a change of zoning from Agri-
cultural (A) to Commercial (C) classification on approximately 11.3 acres;
F (2) a change of zoning from Agricultural (A) to Office (0) classification
on approximately 2.2 acres; and (3) a change of zoning from Agricultural (A)
to Multi-Family (MF-1) classification on approximately 10.1 acres.
Ann Powell, representing Charles Clasgow, spoke in favor of the request.
f She pro posed a change in the third part of the request, instead of Agricultural
to Multi-Family (MF-1) she proposed a zoning change of Agricultural to Planned
Development with four conditions: (1) the density of the development would
be limited to 25 units per acre; (2 a 6 foot solid fence would be constructed
on the west boundary (3) the max{{ mum height of the apartment buildings would
be two story; and (4f site plan approval by the Planning Commission and City
Council is required before development of the Planned Development to apart-
ment use.
Frank Cawthon spoke in favor of the request.
Charles Glasgow, petitioner, spoke in favor of the request, stating that {
the purchase of the property is contingent upon rezoning and he must make
a decision to buy by May 8, 1930.
Dr. Dawson, current owner of the property, spoke in favor of the request.
Mr. Less Holland spoke in opposition to the request,
Mrs John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation.
Ann Powell spoke in rebuttal.
. t
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 2. 1980
Page Two
The Commission discussed the case.
Motion was made by Marilyn Gilchrist and seconded by Carole Busby
to approve the petition as amended by Ann Powell. Motion carried
unanimously.
A. Consider the final replat and site plan of Daugherty Addition.
Greg Edwards. City Engineer, stated that the water line plans were
not satisfactory.
Additioniaferro to
of n Daugherty Richar
Motion aereplat l and r site a plan seconded
deny the final
B. Consider the final replat of Phillips Addition.
Charles Watkins recommended approval.
Mot
ttheionfinalwasrepmadeatbyfBPhilill
C. Consider the final replat of Oak Meadows Addition.
Charles Watkins recommended approval.
{ ill Bra theifinalsreplatbofeOak MeadowsnAddition, Motionncarriedaunanimously.
0. Consider the preliminary plat of Laurel Addition.
Charles Watkins recommended approval with two conditions:
1. Approval of the preliminary plat does not constitute approval of
the drainage pattern implied by the plat.
FA
2, East/west portion of Highland Park Road needs to have a 60 foot
The Planning and Zoning Commission suggests increasing the 16' side yards
along east/west Highland Park Road.
a•. Motion was made by Richard Taliaferro and seconded by Andy 5idor to approve
the preliminary plat of Laurel Addition with conditions. Motion carried
P unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 6,45 p.m.
{
3.' 1
i
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
to the City Council
Z-1447
May 6, 1980
I
Identity and Location:
This is the petition of Golden Triangle Joint Venture requesting a Change of
zoning from Planned Development (PO) for single family use to Commercial (C)
zoning classification on a triangular shaped tract approximately 112 acre in
size. The property is located along the southeast side of Loop 288 approxi-
mately 636 feet northeast of the intersection of Loop 288 and Interstate 35E,
Background;
When the Planned Development for the mall and Township It was approved in
March 1973, the general plan included the site inthis request and designated
it for single family use.
Report:
Adjacent 'and use includes the mall on the northwest side of Loop 288 with
undeveloped land to the northeast and south, and an auto salvage yard on the
west,
Surrounding zoning includes the Planned Development (PD) for the mail and
Township It across Loop 288, commercial zoning to the southwest light Industrial
zoning to the northeast and a petition for Planned Development ~PD) toning
t 7, (Z-1436) to the south and east of this site is pending before the City Council.
'
The Comprehensive Plan designates the site in this request for Lignt Industrial
use.
A With respect to public facilities, a water line would need to ba extended from
I the Intersection of Loop 288 and I-35; to serve the site with sewer a line will
need to be extended from the intersection of Pecan Creek and Loop 288. Electrical
service is available for extension to the site and there will be adequate capacity
in all the tines.
The petitioner oils the adjacent tract to the southwest which is already zoned
Commercial (C) classification, and wishes to develop the properties together. The
Punning and Zoning Commission feet that this would probably be a poor location
for single family development because of the adjacent high intensity zoning,
and felt that the Commercial (C) zone in this request is compatible with the
comprehensive plan. For these reasons the Planning and Zoning Commission
;f recommends approval of 2-1442.
h 4'.
.2,,.
t
t, rv ¢¢,,A k n a ~ R yt t 7 6
I ~y1• ~V ~ 1 ~ L . a ~ ;IFS 7: ] Y i - t I
tr • , i
~ ~t. A $ Ci var`A~t !fir ~ S al y A~'~,'S r ti a o'ib'. e w;. ~Y ^ a• ~i r r t e r a,~
t $~VF,~1'~ •~1 ~~rf ~ i t t r .~Yi ~w. 'tia 7 ' , ~ ` V 4
W 4. 4eta ~.1, "r- t~ •~}(~t r ' '.i "'i !
~4 ~1 r^vr'~~ PSI `"Ilk1
thy'
t S`
R a ~ M S V
t a"` k ~ ~ 9j'FYMV1~~ ~IY' .L ti ° ~v ~ 5~~►P lan ~t r. IL
l t y .t_ ~i
t € • s es ^ ~ 1., i Er ~ . a ~ 0 } w ,91,x. ~ 'K„ E'1
a `P t V , k •w. l~ ~f 4M$ Il~+~,r ~ T WI 'xT ~.1 ✓ v:.+^• k@^'a:P~tMF
~ ~ ' +.1\ y`Y~ 1, ~ Air. P 7 7. 1~ S \ ✓ a p ~ it ~
1 \ 'h 1 . ~ ~ 'T 'rJ ~ •y r P ~t fa J ` ~Fa yr ~Ir \ 'H
a '
t ~ P~J
IF IN A
.~,s e~ , rA p y
r• ' R t ~ t R Y~ b y t'.~'i
t. t It
err k° y t'
' ~1 w \ d ' ! ""'H t F1 1 ~ r r\~'ICP#~+~ a ~ r {F ^1 f.
.Yfi r~•-6 Paf h _ a .earl r P e{.~ ~•t, P~ 1
d ►ia~ t X~rya~ t^`YtN ~ ` Jy ~ r f I r ~ a t ,
r^ dytry~, ~ G~ ~.r ,.j Y. 1 ~ R is J 1 v r \ r:y' ~`t.
d
to t P ~ t P l
V
' ! . ~ r { .ar , t ~ ' a t i 'i4l a" ~TI r ~ t•r l~ri ~r ~tPt* K
' .,o^AC )r 4 P r V i~ 1! ar.'.ty 14,
1v Y t,~ a• ,~~~{~Sy~}N •y .k 8; l$, ~~"k •'y',• (V ~`;r` 7~1, ~J~ 6
r , . t~, ^V \ iR°I'F t~,t 61` \ ! ~ t~1, ~ t ",J P C •~~.J f ^ rn ~ ~L l
l \ SI /~'~4Y1 .9 ~A' ~'C~fi~k,tf Pry~ I J v 4 '~L~'t 4i.! I~pP W
V
•r
A
A 4
~ I yP ~ ~
a w . ~ 1 . J9 t
y, ♦ 1 1 y ~ V zt ` °•a i 1l "l C'r S' 1 a ~ T i ~ 1
f ' ~ t+b~ i R' ' ~ ~ 4 spy, r +
^~r ~ 1~y its 1 i4'~ ,'4f~ +T+ '~e a s 1 s 1 ~ a }
No
x r~ r ! ' 3 ' t r.
1h der .4 R !
t'•K lay e1 M 1
F ~ Yoi 14 ~lry,~1~!$~f e'P,,;M. ~Yrf , e,.1+V kq
r,. ~ ~ ~,~t` ` 44tt~r'R ~ l~♦ ~ ~ e."/'~r. ~ ' ~C a^Irl ~P~~
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
T-1447
IN FAVOR IN OP,,OSITION UNDE_CIDEp
Henry S. Miller Co. Jack Brown
2001 Bryan Tower 2515 Dallas Dr,
30th Floor Denton, Tx. 76201
Dallas, Tx 75201
Carl B. Sadau ,
Board Chairman
Seventh Day Adventist Church
2111 Loop 288
Denton, Texas 762ol
Ir'~y I
E
`9y
tike~y' 1 2E*~
4 W~
t..j 1
°t6 I fI A
VT~
r~P°F i
e;xREPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Case No. Z-1447
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the date if
the public hearing.
City Planner •
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear-
ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment, if
they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice.
return this reply form in opposition to tha proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it.
j rf you havs• questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8354.
Plasse use BLACK ink only.
.Q~
REPLY ~t jGr
10
( ) I am in favor of this zoning request. St).
O
(jT'0"~r as opposed to this zoning request. ,
I ( ) r am undecided about this zoning request.
i
{ My comments are as followst.We feel that a change from planned development'
/ to commercial zoning would open up the property in question to development
which may well be inconsistent with the surrounding premises and ineapatible
with orderly, development..~We feel that this particular property, being
frontage on Loop 288, is in _a key position with regard to the surrotmAing
properties. We feel that the additional City input in the development of
this property is desirable to the City and the surrounding property owners
and we would encourage the commission not to relinquish that input by re-
w i .
P zoning the property to cos e~r,~J~t s r:J, Il L
Of1J.ut'h O%Ic~ITi /f C' L:I1tN~ ~J
Address 11 ! ~''~i c-F~ lt.~, tom., 7 X••
Phone
I
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Case. No. Z-1447
The/Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning ppetition to e return itstoethe following tpublihis
$,and
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return a
reply form in oppposition to the proposed change, the City Council must
attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply,
form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, those com
ments are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Counci'
If your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use
this form to notify us, concerning your position.
If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning
Office at 566-8350.
'A
Please use STACK ink only,
since blue ink cannot be xeroxed. ~~G
REPLY t~eO
( am in favor of this zoning request,
( ) I am opposed to this zoning request,
( ) I am undecided about this zoning request,
1
My comments are as follows:
f rl~~,~ J M14~Qr C&, Signature
c~0~ t dr an ~70w-e~ Address
}+hlo Phone r ~C~
Pbk..an
REPLY FOR TAE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Case No. Z-1447
The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this
case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to
the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete
this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of
the public hearing.
City Planner
Municipal. Building
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear-,
and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if
they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice
return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City
Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it.
Offiyou ce at have 8350 ps-taining to the case, please call. tha Planning:
Please use BLACK ink only.
F~
REPLY ~GF
9
{ ) Z ant in favor of this zoning request.
I an opposed to this zoning request.
( ) r an undecided about this zoning request.
My comments are as follows s, The planned development is a highly advan-
tageous zoning classification from the City's,viewpoint and from the view-
point of the property owners in the area. The property to the South of the
tract, including my Property is being developed in the planned development r
concept, The City Staff has encouraged planned development and I have ap-
plied to change some existing commercial zoning to planned development,- T al
city should retain the planned development zoning and encouraged planned de-L
valo meet of the remaining commercial tract adjacent thereto,
-F
Address
Phone 0.9
I
1 4Jell t nSf+! h
2 5,.' 4 r
r
19 .z . I f ~ r
2sr
r
i
12
`r
III cm 7,*dlvno egmjoso TA e/e
kA Ljite ?4ss rll~_f 7..OA
E t i 7
AA A /1 -79 A
~i
17
S. Sdda u
f
N
1
r
i
.c)
.
f
i
I
1
j
i
Minutes
Planning and Toning Commission
April 16, 1980
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission met on April 16, 1980 at
5:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Bill Brady, Marilyn Gilchrist, Linnie McAdams, Robert La Forte, Carole
Busby and Richard Taliaferro. Staff members were: John Lavretta,
Charles Watkins, Greg Edwards and Susan Wigand.
ABSENT: Andy Sidor.
Bill Brady called the meeting to order.
I, A. Approve the minutes of the April 2, 1980 meeting,
` B. Approve the minutes of the April 71 1980 study session. +
f Motion was made by LaForte and seconded by Busby to approve bath minutes.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ii, Public Hearings
A. Z-1447. This is the petition of Golden Triangle Joint venture requesting
a change of zoning from Planned Development (PD) for single family use to
Commercial (C) zoning classification on a trienoular shaped tract approximately
1/2 acre in size. The property is located along the southeast sidb of Loop 288
approximately 636 feet northeast of the intersection of loop 288 and interstate 35E, a
Phil Smith, representing the land owner, spoke in favor of the request. i
Carl Sadau, Board chairman of Seventh Day Adventist Church on loop 288, spoke
in opposition to the request.
Linnie McAdams arrived at this time.
Charles Watkins presented the staff recomnendatior„
No one spoke in rebuttal,
The Commission discussed the case, 1
Motion was made by Taliaferro and seconded by Gilchrist to approve Z-1447.
Motion was approved by a vote of 5 to 11 Linnie McAdams abstained.
III. Consider the final plat of Laurel Addition.
~JPa 3
Charles Watkins asked the Commission to table the final plat of the laurel Addition
w. since all requirements had not been met,
Motion was made by Bill Brady and seconded by Richard Taliaferro to table
the final plat of the Laurel Addition, Motion carried unanimously,
pe The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p,m.
X1'3
t '
:
E
AN ORDINANCE AMLNDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OP
ORDINIUCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1,
AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 109.102 ACRE OF LAND
AS SHOWN THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY OF
0ANTON TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE UATB.
THE COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted
the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under provisions of
ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same s hereby amended as
follows:
All the hereinafter described property toned Planned
DevelofPlent "PD" is hereby amended with the following
conditionsl
1. The maximum development shall be to follows:
Office Site 1 maximwn of 2850000 square feet
office spice.
Multi-family Site maximum of 270 unit!.
Restaurant Site 1 maximum of 100 seat restaurant
Cultural Site maximum of 675 theatre seats
Hotel 4 Restaurant maximum of 300 hotel rooms and
200 lest restaurant.
Office sit* 2 maxlmiua of 1510000 square feet
4 office space.
Village Shopping maximum of 60,000 square toot of
Eros) leslibla Ares.
i Site plan approval by the Planning i Zonins Coal-
` mission and the City Cnuncil to required before
developpment,C Vatistlcme in the Actual :its
I a )the buildingbdensiptyfe net Inc stoodplrn ea long
r 2. The developer will construct the street tystsm including
Wimbleton Boulevard and Village Nay as lnd:ceted by the pplan,
Wimbleton Boulevard will be constructed to the initial phA$$$
of the development on the north side of this street.
The developer will widen State School load to 49 fast from
tYlsbleton Boulevard to interstate 3S when the traffic volume is
14,040 tN ps per day,
r yE
3. The developer will follow the dtslgn momcept erNtented
on the renderln , to the extent that the pedestrian way, Weldon
Wath, will be built end rho buildings will be sited gemerally
slang the cotrldor. The developer is not required t.o follow
the rondering to the extent that the buildings kill hale to be
sited or designed as III-:stratcd, and vartatlons In the
location of the walk can be approved on the sits plan.
4, The maximum building height for the office arts. fronting
on State School Road is two (2) stories. The other offlc) a ea
and hotel area can have tatter bulUings It approved on the
site plan.
2.1445-ROBERT NICCERSON-PAGE ONO
I
a
t
A S. A minimum 10 foot wide landscaped area will be provided
adjoining the east side of State School Road right of way and
the north side of WLmbleton Boulevard right of way.
6. The site designated recreational shall be maintained as
open space by the developer for recreation and drainage
purposes unless the property is dedicated to the City 'for park
development and the City accepts the dedication.
The metes and bounds of said property is more particularly
described as follows, to-wit:
All that
situate d InrthenM.iEtP. tAaPCR.R. pSurveyoEAbstract 1No. a9SObethe
i Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, and the Levi Young
Survey, Abstract No. 1451 Denton County, Texas, being a part
of a certain (called) 123.000 acre tract deeded by HFA,
Incorporated to Oak Ridge Company on the 30th day of May, 19736
recorded in Volume 676, Page 346, and a part of a certain
(called) 22.377 acre tract deeded by Richard H. Tallaferro to
Oak RidQQa Company on the 27th day of August, 1973, recorded in
Volumfully described;s Dead Records of said County, and being
BEGINNING at the right of way marker sltuatei in the southwest
right of way of Interstate Highway 3SB at intersection with
State School Road;
THENCE south SS0 09' 23" east along the south right of vay of
` LH 3SB a distance of 283.80 feet to an angle;
i THENCE south 370 08' OS" east along the right of way of Ili
3SE a distance of 180.00 feet;
THLNCL south 420 SO' 21" west a distance of 180.30 feet;
THENCE south 040 41' 43" west a distance of 533.85 feet;
THENCE south 410 08' OS" east a distance of 1210.00 feet; ~
i
THENCE north 420 $1' SS" east a distance of 600.00 Eeet the
south right of way line of IH 352;
THENCE south 470 08' OS" east along the south right of way of
IH 338 a distance of 2386.10 feat to an iron pin;
THENCE south 360 00' 49" vest along a fence a distance of
i SS3.83 feet to a fence corner post;
THENCE south 000 02' 46" east along a fence a distance of
121.85 feet;
THENC8 north :30 47' 10" west a distance of 1345.73 feeti
THENCE north 800 31' 36" east a distance of 171.21 teat to an
j iron pin;
{
C THENCE north 090 28' 24" west a distance of 354.61 le.t to in
iron pin;
THENCE around a curve to the left a distance of 300.99 feet,
the chard of said curve bears north 830 to, 18" waft a
distance of 300.82 feet;
f V]
THENCE around a curve to the right a distance of 499.86 feat,
+;y the chord of said curve bears north 700 40' 19" welt a
distance of 493.39 feat;
THENCE north $40 40' 17" vest a distance 503.06 feet;
;r 2-1445-ROBERT NICKERSON•PAGB TWO
,
r
I THENCE around a curve to the left a distance of 274.45, feet,
the chord of said curve bears north 630 SS' 19" west a
distance of 273.26 feet;
THENCE around a curve to the right a distance of S09.32 feet,
the chord of said curve bears north 440 46' S0" west a
distance of 469.21 feet;
THENCE around a curve to the left a distance of 531.66 feet,
the chord of said curve bears north 430 17' 11" west a
distance of 512.35 feet to an iron pin in the east right of way
of State School Road;
I THENCE north 050 13' 47" east along the east right of way of
crate School Road a distance of 1809.65 feat to an iron pin;
'HENCE north 710 37' 1S" east a distance of 109.41 feet to
the point of beginning and containing 109.102 acres of land.
SECTION 11.
That the City council of the city of Denton, Texas hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the -:urpose of promoting the general welfare of the
City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration among
other things for the character of the district and ltor its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, Promaing human lives,
and encouraging the most a proprlate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its eltitens.
I I
I SF.CTI_ON III.
That this ordinance shall be in full forca and effect
immediately after its paesatQe and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore De en held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
Y after Siring due notice thereof.
mryt PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
4 A. D. 1980.
2 F
CITY OP OENTON, TEXAS
1
ATTEST:
V ~S
I 4Tr"MMr IN I
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
a
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORA
C. J. TAYLOR JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTbN, TEXAS
BY,
aka
x,'
d
Py
4
N{ 2.1445-ROIERT NICKERSON•PAGE OME
I,
a
.,1
~I
MINUTES
CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
April 30, 1980
Special Called Emergency Meeting of the City of Denton Airport
Advisory Board, Wednesday, April 30, 1980 at 12:00 Noon in the i
Conference Room of the City Manager's Office. i
MEMBERS PRESENT: Wright, Carrell, Moorehead, Marshall, Howell
and Keith
MEMBERS ABSENT: Slater
OTHERS PRESENT: Frank Strickler of Fox-51, Limited; Burt
Solomons, Tommy Jones, and Bill Angelo of the
City staff {
1, Executive Session - Land Lease Negotiations.
j 2. The Board considered a lease agreement with Fox-51,
Limited for a proparty lease at Denton Municipal Airport.
Airport Manager Tommy Jones presented revised copies of
the contract and briefed the Board on the major changes of
that contract including rentals and fees and buy-back
ig provisions under the lease agreement. Tommy recommended
to the Board that they consider approving this contract.
Motion was made by Poorehead, seconded by Carrell, to
` recommend to the City Council that this contract be
approved. Motion carried unanimously.
3. The Board considered a lease agreement with Al Yates for
an office space lease at the Denton Municipal Airport.
Burt Solomons briefed the Board on this item explaining
the provisions under the lease agreement. Tommy Jones
explained that this lease agreement would allow Al Yates
to utilize an unused portion of the Airport Terminal
Building for office space in conjunction with his
? operation for a rental fee of $50 a month. Motion was
made by Carrell, seconded by Marshall, to recommend to.the
City Council that this lease agreement be approved.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. The Board considered discussion on the City of Denton Five
Year Capital Improvement Plan. Bill Angelo briefed the
aoard on this item explaining that he and Tommy Jones had
c ,
pS 1~'.5
1
71
Airport Advisory Board Minutes
April 30, 1980
Page Two
I
' met the previous week to discuss priorities for capital
improvements in and around the Denton Municipal Airport.
Angelo recommended that the Board consider the following
h projects as high priority items for inclusion in the City
of Denton Capital Improvement Plan:
a. extension of a water line from I-35 near victor
Equipment down Airport Road to the entrance of
the Denton Municipal Airport,
b. roadway repair or reconstruction along the east
side of Denton Airport on County Road 1515;
C. development of an internal roadway system at the
Airport paralleling both the north and so•ith
taxiways.
Motion was made by Carrell, seconded by Marshall, to
recommend to the Planning s Zoning Commission that these
1 projects be included in the City of Denton Capital
Improvements Plan for the 1985 Fiscal Year. Motion
careted unanimously.
With no further business, the Board adjourned at ltll P.M.
Y z;
f
ps I
a
r
f~
i
y9
41 i
it n.win:Yid:
r
4 A. '
N0.
I
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAF OF THE "STY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS. SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1,
AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY O.S3S61 ACRE OF LAND
AS SHON'N THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS,
SECTION I.
That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted
the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton. Texas under provisions of
Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same Is hereby amended as
follows:
All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed
from the Single Family "SF-7" District as shown an said Zoning
Mop, ■nd all provisions of Ordinance No. 69.1 adopted the IAN
day of January, 1969, as amended, :hall hereafter apply to sa;d
property as General Retail "GR" District in the same manner as
other property located in the General Retail "GR" District and
more particularly described as follows;
i
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land tying and
being situated in the City and County of Denton State of
Texas, and beln a 0.53561 acre tract n the A. H111 Surveyy,
Abstract No. 62 and being part of Lots 12, 130 14, and I5,
Block 8 of the Paul Hamilton Additlon to the City of Denton as
shown by the Plat recorded to Volume 346, Page 401 Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a found steel pIn on the south boundary line of
Eagle Drive at its intersection with the east boundary line of
Cleveland Street at the ntrthwost corner of Lot 12, Block I of
said Hamilton Addition;
THENCE south 8Bo 41' 20" east with the south boundary line of
Eagle Drive 16.13 feet to a steel ppin at the west corner of
and James A. Erwin
Oak; tract described in a deed from Joe lift
to the Citr of Denton, Texas, and recorded in Volume 806, Page
383, Dced Records of sa14 County;
THENCE south 800 54' 09" east with the south boundary line of
Eagle Drive 9S.91 feet to a steel pia; ti
THENCE south 860 41, 2o" east with the south boundary line of
< eagle Drive 119.0 feet to a found steel pint
E
THLICE south 00 51' West with the cost boundary line of lot
is, 1$2.34 feet to a steel pin at s (onto corner;
THENCE. north 890 $5, 2711 west 116.2 feet to a fence corner At
the southwest corner of Lot 14;
THENCE north 10 SS' 29" east with a fence 72.65 feet to a
' stool pin;
THENCE north 860 40, $0" west with a fence 116.0 to a steel
pin on the east boundary line if Cleveland Street;
THENCE north 10 40' 40" east with the east boundaryy line of
h' Cleveland Street 74.5 feet to the place of baginning,
containing In all O.S3561 acre of land.
It` t-1443-CHARLES P, MULKEY-PAG8 ONE
:
C '
SECTION II. !
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Tuxes hereby
comprehensive
promoting accordance
the c general a welfre, of the
plan finds for a the u purpose g of is in
€ City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other things Ear the character of the district and or its
Peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraging the most a propriste uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its cititelss.
SECTION Ill.
That this ordinance shall be In full force and effect
immediately after its passage and aplravsl, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Conmisslon anA the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,
A. D. 1480.
CITY OF DENTON, TEILAS
ATTEST:
j
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
f
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK
C. J. TAYLOR, Jk., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DMON, TEXAS
he .
uq8
r
I
Z•1443•CEMLES P. MULKEf-PAGE 1110
s
gl ,
-....v .rev
Y•- 1
` CITY OF DENTON
ME+IORANDU:f
DATE OF MEETING Anril 22. 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITE',°, (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA)
Consider an ordinance to amend Section 1704 of the 1916 Uniform Building Code
adopted by sec. 1514 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton to
eliminate wood shingles from all new construction.
SUMWY:
There were several questions raised on the wording of the prior ordinance that
3 was passed in order to eliminate any doubt as to the Council's intentions.
We would recommend this amendment which specifically eliminates all wood
shingle construction.
FISCAL S=MY:
No cost will be incurred to the City of Denton.
~ I
I
ACTION REQUIRED: ~
Council should move to approve this amendmEnt,
ALTERNATIVES:
1 t
Not Applicable I
' STAFF RECO.`MENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval.
F
VGLrBITS: l
F
I. Memo to G. Chris Hartung
if. Copy of Ordinance
A
___rWrT
i
71
Cllr OF DENTON
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: April 29, 1980
I
RE: Update on the Shingle Ordinances as it stands now.
I
Currently the ordinance for wood shingles that was passed by the Council
at prior meetings allows for the following:
Wood shingles or shakes can be used only on single-family residential
housing. These building materials can only be used if they have been
treated with a non-flammable solution and approved by Underwoiters
Laboratory. This type of construc.ion would also require the shingles
to be applied over a 1/2-inch minimum thickness plywood deck. An
underlayment of polyethylene coated steel foil must be installed so
that it extends between each horizontal joint of the plywood deck as
well as covering all of the top surfaces of the plywood.
s
As we stated at the last meeting, the reason it was brought back to the
Council was because it was thlz staffs understanding that the Council
4 wanted to eliminate wood shingles totally.
K
c sve a
7 ~
r.~t
'n c7
5 yf
Y
r
M
I
1 ,.ice
.IWI
111
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1701 OF THE 1976 LINIFOR.'S BUILDING
CODE ADOPTED BY SECTION 5-11 Of THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY AMENDING SECTION 1706 TO PROVIDE THAT
ALL ROOF COVERINGS SHALL BE FIRE-RETAADANTr PROHIBITING HOOD
SHINGLES AND 54AXESr AND PROVIDING FOR AN trr ECTivE DATY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or DENTON, HEREBY ORDAI431
SECTION 1.
Paragraph (B} of Section 5-11., Deletions and Amendments,
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, TOXas as
amended Is hereby amended so that Paragraph (a) of Section S-11
shall hereafter read as followar
ie1 Section 1701 of the Uniform Bvllding Cade, 1976
Edition, is deleted end amended to read as follovsr
s See. 1701. Roef covering shall be flee-retardant.
Fire Retardant treated wood shingles and shakes and
untreated woad shingles and shales shall b,t
prohibited.
• Jkylights shall be constructed an required in Chapter
y
Penthouse shall be constructed as required in
Chapter 16.
For use of plastics in roofs see Chapter 57.
ti For Attics[ Access and Area, see section 1105.
For Roof Drainage, see Section 1107. _
ASECTION it.
That this ordinance shall become effective from and after k
( its date of passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,
i ~ 1960.
BILL HASH, MfOa
V CITY Of DZWM* TEXAS
EF
ATTESTr
t„. S
"
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS f
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PORM i
C. J. TAYLOR, JR.r CITY ATTORNEY j
•y. • • C17Y OF DENTON, TEAS
3 ` Ott
m
E
1{;
,
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING May 6, 198G
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO HE PLACED ON AGENDA):
Resolution to approve plans from North Texas State University for 11elch Street
Drainage Project.
SGMMARY:
North Texas State University has completed plans and specifications for the
drainage system on Welch, Highland 6 Prairie and a second system on Avenue A
north of Eagle. Staff has reviewed the plans and specifications and suggested
.ects.
changes to overcome problems experienced In the past Proi
i
FISCAL SUMMARY: i
1
There will be no cost to the City of Denton.
i
ACTION REQUIRED: E
Council should approve the resolution approving the plans and construction. r
l x' ALTERNATIVES:
j Not to approve the resolution or allow work to be done. a
-,s STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
's
Staff would recommend that you approve the resolution.
EXHIBITS:
1. memo to G. Chris Hartung from Rick Svehla
t
YJ
,toy
i
s
I
i
I
I
CITY OF DENTiYl
ME MORAN DL91
TO: G. Chris Hartwig
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: April 3D, 1980
RE: North Texas State University Drainage Project on Welch and Avenue A
f
E Freese and Nichols, engineers for N.T.S.U. has submitted the final plans and
specifications for the Welch Street storm sewer system and the Avenue A system.
We have reviewed the plans and specifications and find them to be in compliance
with our drainage manual and plans. We have also reviewed their specifications
very closely and we believe they have most of the problems solved that caused
problems on earlier projects. They are as follows:
1) The protect is broken up into four main areas of work. One being the
system along Welch, another is 0e part of the system along Prairie, n
third section which is tl:-- Highland part of the system, and the last
section is along Avenue A from Maple to Eagle.
I 1 The contract specifications call for the contractor to start on the
Welch Street part of the system first. Depending on the size and
capabilities of the contractor, he may also be able to start on one
other area. Before he will be able to move from either of these two
3 areas, all work, including the street patching must be completed.
2) In addition to totally completing a section before moving, the
specifications also call for the contractor to have pipe laid in all i
trenches by the end of each day. Realistically, this means that at
the end of each day all trenches will be full with the exception of
probably the last 20 feet or so. This means there will be very few
holes left open at the end of each days work.
3) The trench backfill specifications for all tenches in the street
has also been changed. The specifications require that the last
kt 10 inches of each trench be backfilled with crushed stone. This
should provide for much better traffic movement before the trenches i
are finally paved and it also sivuld reduce the amount of dust in
the construction area.
f
4
1
j
4g~
1;
Page 2
memo to G. Chris Hartung
North Texas State University Urainaga Project on Welch and Avenue A
The staff has worked very closely with North Texas and its engineers to solve
some of the problems we have had on earlier projects. Mr. Jim Nash and his
staff are vary aware of the problems and he has assured us he will take all steps
necessary to insure the least inconvenience to the citizens of Denton and the
students of North Texas. If all o' our efforts fail to meet these criteria,
the City Attorney has advised us that stets can be taken to curtail the con-
struction procedures even further. f
Included in your packet, you have a resolution written by the attorney to
approve the plans and construction of the drainage project. We have talked
with N.T.S.U.'s engineers and they have °zserted their requirements in the
specifications for the ins:-rance liability as stated in the resolution.
The engineering staff would recommend that you approve the resolution.
I
Ric Sveh a
'i
t
j
S7
.1a
t'
S Y
t P
~i"~~~ 6S. ~f~'lAd..r}~~rr._.~.~~ir °rr.•..'.r 3"„~ s
Z ..--i. ` x ~ 1~~ F J F4,
ffL
0; Lai
A
'SARK A - 1 • _ ° ' I.
,i iiL~
Av[- P H D l7C-J V ` rrx
I1{II(1I'7!`
1 Y ^ 1 1
v ~ ~ ~ ~ IIInJJJ
~ 4 ~.`~~1 AV C
~ L7 . - __LLIfl1~ ^r~ f if _77r T
,j CYS& 'v LJ .~~NOKKA
lug]
L;.o.
NC CORMICK rte, ,p 't~~r,
(~4'.,. i \~I~ AVU[. A T. A n t AVE.A
,
►Af ' r,5~ MAm S . y . 3 t,
MA$t
* 4-1 i JxA T~f~•le '.F~•rJ ~I .~~f ' ~~lrs r. ~i, ~f ~ :'T. R ~ •wt-~
J vTy ~;t Y U E IINANa 'u'' ti';' 1/. ~a A..
1W i., Y NTE "
`a -
gi,
A
t
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
G
WHEREAS, North Texas State University has requested
Authority from the City of Denton to perform certain adjustment
■nd improvements to water lines, sanitary sewers, and storm
drainage facilities located in certain public streets of the
.
City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, It is for the joint benefit of the City of Denton
and North Texas State University that such construction be
accomplished; and
WHEREAS, such construction Is to be accomplished under a
contract with the contractor and North Texas State University;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL O^ THE CITY
OF 6ENTON, TEXA, THAT:
SECTION I.
I
The plans, specifications and contract documents designated
as Storm Drain System C and D prepared by Freese and Nich:ls,
Inc. for such construction are hereby approved.
SECTION 11.
North Texas State University and the contractor selected by
c3 A .
hs North Texas State University are hereby authorized to ca-use
such improvements to be constructed in the public streets s'-.own
on the plan and specifications; provided, however, before Any
64 construction Commences the contractor selected by North 7txas
State University shall obtain at his expense a Comprshensits
General Liability Insurance Policy naming the City of Denton,
r9
rrt Texas, and its employees as Insured with the following limits:.
(a) Bodily injury 3100,000 Each Person
1 5300,000 Each Occurrence
(b) Property Damage ,3300,000 Each Occurrence
1300,00P Aggregate.
j Such policy or a certificate shewing such coverage shall be
i
filed with the City Manager of the City of Denton until all
S( work Is completed.
11
i
} SEC'r[ON III.
All of such construction shall be coordinated with the City
Engineer of the City of Denton.
PASSED A\u APPROVED this the , day of s
I9B0.
j;UMR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF D MTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
` C, J. TAYLOR JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTSN, TEXAS
I 1 BY
ky
xV f
]i
5 I .~7
L
.X. 1. l~r
. ti.. _
?T-~' _
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
rot Chris Hartung, ^.ity Manager
FROM: King Cole, Assistant City Manager
DATE: May 1, 1980
i r
SUBJECT: Library Contract k
i
The Council awarded the bide on the Library expansion at the
City Council meeting of April 220 1980. The architect, Dwayne
Landry, has been working with the contractor to finalize the p
contract. Landry will have the final contract document at
Tuesday's Council meeting and at that time he will review the
contents of the contract and make his recommendation.
There will be one significant item of discussion at Tuesday's
meeting. The architect is recommending that a new type roof be
placed on the building instead of the standard "built up" j
asphalt and rock roof, The new type roof was a bid alternate i
known as a Trocal Roof, It Is a "roll down" PCV roof that is
anchored by rock, it is felt, by the architect and our Public
Works Director, that this is a far superior roof. A roof of
tais type is currently being placed on the J, C. Penney building
at the Golden Triangle Mall.
All
The architect will be avas',lable at the meeting to discuss any
aspect of the contract and especially the new type of roof.
Fk
+ug. K ng CO
r
WKC: jm
M1Y ii
,}JC
a ~'d a
I
. a. e:e+Rp
JAMES R. KIRKPATRICK
■ AACHITECT ■
28 April 1980
Mr, Chris Hartung
City Manager, City of Denton
215 ryast McKinney
Dente,,,, Texas 76201
Re: Denton Animal Humane Shelter i
Denton, Texas
Dear Sir:
i
Please find herewith for your review, a Hld Tabulation Sheet of bids received
for the referenced project. Upon review of the bids, my recommendation is to
enter into a contract with David Duffield Construction Company on the basis of
their low base bid of $94,420,00.
I
1 am confident in his understanding of the work to be required and his ability
to complete the project.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact }
me at your convenience, j +
,
y' Sincerely,
s R. Kirkpatrick
f S JRK:hn
' Enclosure
s
3«L r
MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE CF ARCHITECTS
SUITE 518, FIRST STATE BANK BUILDING
r; OENTON,TEXAS 76204 [817)367-8162 i
. ,...,-v..,isw-µ..,«v.;rsr,..e,w..,y„u_.t✓~.wa,.-rw...axa.,.!r~yYtikwrt.WSrr.a 7,.• t3i51A Yw~,~.
BID MIU1,ATION SIHET
1
PRO,lim DENTON HUJIAN£ SHELTER
!10 VA'Ha 2:00 P.M., 24 April 1980
Co,w[RACTOR BASE DID BID ALTERNAIEF
_
DAVID DUFFIELD CONSTRUCTION CO. $ 94 420.00 150 DAYS $ 125,000.00
T.W.T. CONSTRUCTION CO. NO BID _
JONES & JEFFERY CONSTRUCTION CO. $ 99,086.00 / 210 DAYS $ 160,000.00
VANDERWOUDE/WASLIN COMPANY $115,000.00 / 165 DAYS $ 105'0000.00
BOB^.1T CONCRETE NO BID
BETZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY NO BID _
ARB INCORPORATED NO BID _
CONTRACT BUILDERS $113,390.00 It 180 DAYS llS,b7 100
1 4
MODERN GENERAL CONTRACTORS NO SID
s
r,
mod' o. 6
i
May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECTi
Awarding Contract for a 1980 Electric Rate Study.
SUMMARYi
The City of Denton Charter requires that the rates and
charges of the Utility Department be reviewed by the Public
Utility Board at least each five (5) years. The last
electric rate study was performed in 19751 therefore, it is
necessary to conduct another rate study in 1980.
In 1979, Congress passed the Public Utility Regulatory Policy
Act (FURPA), which requires all utilities with electric sales
over 500 million KWH to conform to certain rate making and
customer service standards. Projected sales for Denton for
1980 will be 490 million M. Therefore, Denton will be
1 subject to PURPA regulations and reporting requirements.
' The Consultant is required to develop rates that conform to
the PURPA regulation plus develop a PURPA Compliance Manual
that can provide Denton with a detailed outline of the
M`? necessary data gathering, data processing, accounting and
financial and operational information that will conform with
a PURPA requirements.
k Nine consultants submitted proposals to conduct the rate
study as outlined In the Request for Proposals (RFP), Exhibit
1. The Public Utility Board interviewed the following three
consultantsi
1. Management and Research Consultants, Inc.,
St. Louis, Missouri
2. Gilbert Associates
Austin, Texas
M
3. Touche Ross, Inc.
k,- Dallas, Texas
The Public Utility Board unanimously selected Management and
Research Consultants, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, to
conduct the study. The Principles of Management and Research
,r Consultants, Inc., that will conduct the study for Denton are
Dr. John Pickett, Past Chairman of the Arkansas Public
Utilities Commission, Fred Moriarity, who has directed rate
i
r
F;
I
I
n 0
k S v{T
studies and presented testimony regarding electric rates in
Arkansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Missouri, and Leigh Riddick, who
has been a rate analyst for the Wisconsin Public Service Commission
and the Chief Rate Analyst for the Arkansas Public Service
Commission. In 1978, when Dr. Pickett was Chairman of the Arkansas
Public Service Commission, he, with the assistance of tho Chief Rate
Analyst, Leigh Riddick, developed for the Department of Energy,
Section 133 of the PURPA regulations which represents one of the
major elements of the PURPA manual,
The estimated completion date of the study will be September 15,
1980, Implementation of any rate changes resulting from the rate
study would probably be November 1, 1980.
f. FISCAL SUMMARYt
Charges will be based on an hourly rate with a "not to
exceed" cost of :
RATE STUDY
Time Charges $330520
Estimated Expenses 5r000
Maximum Charges $38,520
t PURPA MANUAL
Time Charges $ 81560
Estimated Expenses L2,000
Maximum Charges $10,560
TOTAL $49,090
I Source of Funds: 1979-80 Electric Asm•nistration
i Budget Account #02-50-85-02
ACTION REQUiREAt
r,?
r Authorize the City Manager to contract for the consulting
ti services for a 1980 Electric Rate Study,
Appoint one member of the City Council to serve on the
Steering Committee along with Ed Coomes, Public Utilities ;
Board) Chris Hartung, City Manager) Bob Nelson, Director of
Utilities) Bill McNary, Finar.ce Directors and Ernie Tullos,
Asst. Director of Utilities,
01 1
p
3
~K
1
Y
ey
i
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Contract with Management b Research Consultants, Inc,
2. Select another consultant.
3. Delay rate study.
a) The Charter requires such a study each five
years: therefore, to comply with the Charter, a
study would need to be initlated sometime in 1980.
RECOMMENDATIONt
The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of April 30, 1960,
' recommended employment of Management and Research
Consultants, Inc., of St. Louis) Missouri, to conduct the
1980 Rate Study and PURPA Compliance Manual for an amount not
to exceed $49,080. The staff, consisting of City Manager,
Chris Hartung, Finance Director, Bill McNary, Director of
Utilities, R. E. Nelson, and Asst. Director of Utilities, E.
€ s, B. Tullos, concurred with the Public Utilities Board
4 recommendation.
Respectfully,
R.E. Nelson
r Director of Utilities
1J EXHIBIT I Request for Proposal
It Proposal of Ma,iagement Research
Consultants, Inc. ;
J~ ,F I
~J a
~ a
2~3
i
;y
J
FXHIBIT
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
1980 ELECTRIC RATE STUDY
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
You are invited to submit a Proposal for an Electric Rate
Study for the Electric Utility of the City of Denton. Four
(4) Proposals shall be submitted to the Director of
l Utilities by 1200 Noon, Tuesday, April 220 1980.
I
I
I. PURPOSE OF THE STUDYs
r A. General:
The purpose of the study is two folds
1) To conduct an electric rate study as requir:d by
charter and also to assure that presont rates correctly
reflect present cost of servicep and,
2) To conduct a review of Denton's compliance with the
Federal Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act, and
{ develop a City of Denton, Electric System, PURPA
Compliance Manual that will outline present status and
future requirements for PURPA compliance.
1AI
`^y, f
Y7'~
i
A'
r-
i
Fy
!
I raw
1
YSy
B. Charter Requirement:
The City Denton Charter requires that th- rates and
charges of the Utility Department be reviewed by the
Public Utility Board at least each fire (5) years. The
last electric rate study was performed in 1975 by Black
and Veatch Consultants of Kansas City, Mo. The
I ciianging capital structure and debt service
requirements of Denton's electric system as a result of
the transfer of generation facility financing from
Denton to TMPA has resultei; in changing revenue
requirements for Denton's electric system. Thera
capital structure changes have, therefore, also
affected previously developed rates structures.
C. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA)
Compliances
The Consultant shall address the City of Denton's PURPA
compliance requirements and prepare a PURPA Compliance
Manual outlining Denton's present status and future
PURPA requirements, along with recommended appropriate
action required and the specific time tables for such
actions.
Recognizing the present and future requirements of
PURPA, this Study shall be conducted in compliance with
PURPA regulations to the degree required by law, The
Consultant shall use appropriate procedures and develop
supporting documentation such that all rate study
information may be used for future PURPA compliance
requirements.
i
1;4
I
a
2
L.
Y
r,t ,
M sus,
I
i
~ I . SCO OF
WORK:
A. ELECTRIC RATE STUDY:
1. Financial Analysis:
The Consultant shall review the electr?.c utility's
historical and future revenue requirements and
.expenses. The Study shall anticipate costs and revenue
requirements and develop rates that will be applicable
for the next five (5) years, if feasible. Projected
future capital and operating expenditures will be
provided by the Utility Staff, but shall by reviewed
and analyzed by the Consultant.
A 1980 Power SupFly Study is presently underway, due to
be completed by May, 1980, that will inc.ude
projections of revenues, expenses and capital
requirements that may be used by the Consultant.
The rates shall be designed to provide revenue such
that bond rata covenen+:s are met. Bond covenents
require that pledged revenues be 1.4 times average debt
service requirerents. However, revenues shall also be
such that net income is sufficient to allow in annual
discretionary transfer from the Electric Fred to the
General Fund equal to 68 of system equity.
2. Rate Structure Designs
The Consultant shall evaluate the cost associated with
serving vario,ss identifiable classes of customers.
Rates shall be designed to recover eunh associated
customer class costs as much a•e possible, however, j
recognizing such rate making principals as moderating
any significant changes of historical :ates.
Customer classes shall be similar to current rate
:raking practices of area utilities and the Texas Public
Utility Commission, to the extent that such classes are
applicable to the City of Denton's oleatrical system,
t Rate structure dt3ign shall take into consideration
applicable PURPA requirements of Title I, Subtitle H,
Sec. 111(d)(1-6), and shall genetr.lly conform to the
following:
a) Cost of Service
The rates charged for providing electrical service to
each class of electric customers shall be designed, to
the maximum extent practicable, to reflect the costs of
providing electrical service to such class.
3
T,
jj p ii..-. a . f
i
{
~ A
ri.tR.li i
b) Declining Block Rates
The energy component of a rate, or the amount
attributed to the energy component in a rate, charged
for providing electric service during any period to any
class of consumers may not decrease as kilowatt hour
consumption by such class increasoa during such period,
except where such costs for providing electric service
to such class are attributable to such energy component
decrease as such consumption inereasea during such
period.
c) Time-of-Day Rates
The Consultant shall consider an experimental
time-of-day rate. Such rate shall be available on a
request basis to 25 customers approved by the Director
lam.- of Utilities. Such time-of-day rate shall reflect the
costs of providing electric eervice to such class of
electric consumers at different times of the day unless
such rates are noL cost-effective with respect to such
class.
d) Seasonal Rates
i
The rates charged for providing electric service to
each class of electric consumer shall be on a seasonrl
basis which reflects the costs of providing service to
such class of consumers at different seasons of the
year to the extent that such costs vary seaso;ally for
+t the Denton 8l¢otric Utility,System.
yptl e) Interruptible Rates
1 The Consultant shall consider 6 develop an
interrupptible rate applicable to industrial and
commeroial electric customers of appropriate size. The
interruptible rate shall refls of the cost of providing
such service to the class of consumer receiving such j
ors:
service.
1ly
ak
e
4
rN
I~h~
YtliIUP
I~
f) Lifeline Rates:
The Consultant shall consider a residential rate that
will provide cost based lower charges for small
consumption customers similar to Denton's present A-l
' .enidential rate. This rate shall be based on cost of
service to such class of customer and shall take into
consideration the complexity and cost of administration
.f such rate.
g) Customer Produced Energy:
The Consultant shall consider a customer-produced
I'I energy rate. Such rate shall be available on a request
basis to twenty-five (25) customers approved by the
Directur of Utilities. Such rate, shall consider
customer owned and operated energy conserving systems,
such as wind power, solar conversion, etc that may
provide energy for the customer, plus generating excess
energy that may be fed into Denton's electric system.
h) Energy Charge Adjustment:
I 1
The Consultant shall analyze the applicability of an
energy charge r.ijustment. This charge shall represent
variable fuel &nd/or purchased power costs, if such a
charge is applicable, it shall be designed to conform
to generally ac:~;apted practices of similar such charges
of other area utilities, providing such practices are
~
in compliance with appropriate regulat'-)ry agencies 3n
PURPA.
3. Hearince for Consideration and Determination:
I 4 I 1
The Consultant shall analyze the appropriateness of
vle
conducking hearings in accordance with PURPA Section
111 ~a) requirements, if such hearings for
consideration and determination of establishing
specified standards are deemed appropriate, the Public
Utility Board will conduct such hearings with the
assistance of the Consultant. Such hearings shall be
conducted as early in the process of the Study as
possible so as to provide the basis for subsequent rate
structure deve.,pment, The hearings shall be conducted
according to regulations and procedures as outlined by
PURPA.
ay.
5
s~ts+ro~
B. EVALUATION OF PURPA F-ZOUIREMENTSt
1. Rate Making Standards:
The Consultant shall review, evaluate and make
appropriate recommendations as to Denton's compliance
with PURPA rate making standards of Title I, Subtitle
9, Section 111(d)(1-6) composed ofi
1 Cost of service.
2. Declining block rates
3. Time-of-day rates
4. Seasonal rates
5. InterruptOle rates
6. Load management techniques.
2. Consideration and Determination of Standards
The Consultant shall review, evaluate and make
appropriate recommendations as to Denton's compliance
with PURPA's request to consider and determine such
standards as described in Section 111 of PURPA
regulations. If necessary, the City of Denton Public
Utility Board will plan to hold public hearings and
a take testimony relating to the above-referenced
standard's (gee Section 11,A.3 above). Public hearings
will be held at the conclusion of the rate study prior
to final adoption of the rates.
a:* 3. Adoption of Curtain Standards
The Consultant shall review, evaluate and make
apppropriate recommendations as to Denton's compliance
I with PURPA standards of Title I, Subtitle B, Section
113(b) (1 through S).
1. Master Metering
2. Automatic Adjustment Clause
s. Information to Customers
x
z, 4. Procedures for Termination of Electric Service
S. Advertising
4. Lifeline Rates
S h ~
O The Consultant shall review, evaluate and make
appropriate recommendations as to Denton'a compliance
i with PURPA': provision for lifeline rates as detailed
in Title i, Subtitle B, Section 114.
~s 6 ,
III. GENERAL INFORMATION1
A. Description of Denton's Operating System:
The City of Denton owns and operates its electrical /
system which primarily serves the population of 52,000 !
within the city limits of Denton. Denton is located
twenty (20) miles north of the Dallas-Fort Worth
regional airport and thirty-five (35) miles
equi-distant from the downtown metropolitan areas of
Dallas and Fort Worth. Due to the close proximiky of
Denton to these dynamic metropolitan areas and
transportation centers, Denton is experiencing
substantial industrial, commercial and residential
growth.
3. Fl.ectrical Requirements:
Retail electrical sales in 1979 were 460,000,000 KWH
and are estimated to be 490,000,000 KWH in fiscal year
1980 (October 1, 1979-September 30, 1980). Electrical
system power and energy requirements are projected to
increase at a rate of 6.3% per year over the next ten
(10) years with a 479 load factor. Present electrical
R demand is 109mw with an estimated 109-119 growth in the
near term due to present significe,it new customers.
Lower growth is expected thereafter,
C. Customer Mixi
There are 17,150 electric customers, approximately 826
are residential, 169 are commercial and industrial and
29 are municipal and other. Energy sales are
distributed i., a ratio of approximately 319
residential, 649 commercial and industrial and 5%
municipal and other. Denton is the home of North
Texas State University and Texas Women's University
+qs which represent approximately 159 6 59 respectively of
the peak demand requirements of the system.
D Utility and City Staffs
The Utility Department, Electric, Water & Sewer, is
under the direction of the Director of Utilities. The
Assistant Director of Utilities is responsible for the
Y; day-to-day operation, maintenance, design and
construction of the Electric Department. The Electric
Department is divided into three operating divisions,
each under the supervision of a superintend
Electrical Production, with 40 employees, Electrical
D str ut on, with 39 employees, and _M_e_t_e_r`-_i_n_g~ and
• Su atat ons, with 9 employees. The Electric utility
A m n stration has approximately 8 employees.
7
4.r
-R~
V:4A4'q ,
The Director of Utilities reports to the City Manager,
who is rasponzible to the City Council. The Utility
Department purchases the services of several city
support groups. The Finance Department, under the
direction of the Finance Director, provides the most
support services through their Accounting Division and
Customer Service Division. The Customer Service
Division is responsible for meter reading and customer
related assistance. Data Processing is performed by
the Data Processing Department under the direction of
the Assistant City Manager.
E. Generation and Power Su2pli
The City of Denton generates approximately 601 of its
energy requirements with its natural gas fueled
steam-turbine generating plan:. The remaining 401 of
the energy requirements are obtaAnsd through a natural
gas transfer and economic generation dispatching
arrangement with the cities of Garland, Bryar and
Greenville. Denton's natural gas is transferred via
j Lone Star Gas Company to either Garland or Bryan, who
have larger, more efficient generators, 'where the
electricity is then generated and then transmitted via
Brazos Electric Power Coop transmission system back to
Denton, The mutual economic benefits are pro-rated
between Denton and the generating city,
Presently, Denton's future power and energy
requirements are planned to be met by generation plants
being financed and constructed by the Texas Municipal
Power Agency. (TMPA), a joint action agency formed by
Denton, Garland, Bryan and Greenville. TMPA is
constructing a 400mw mime-mouth lignite plant near
Bryan, due to be on line in 1982? plus TMPA has a 6.21
I ( interest (142mw) in the Texas Utilities Comanche Peak
Nuclear Units 11 & 12, scheduled for completion in 1981
and 1982. Denton's share of TMPA is approximately ?91,
F. Revenuess
Revenue from electrical sales in 1979 was $18,228,149,
Residential sales represented' $6,046,432 (331) and
commercial and industrial sales were $11,060,823 (611)
with municipal and other sales of $lp120,894 (61),
Operating expenses were $13,703,602, with fuel and
purchased power (economic dispatch) representing
$111089,549 or 811 of the total operating expenses.
Net income was $2,667,888.
z
I
i
I
IV. REGULATORY ENVIRONMENTt ,
A. City Councils
111 ~
The City Council, presently a five member governing 1
body elected at large, is being expanded to a seven
member governing body elected from districts with the
Mayor elected at large. The Council is charged with
the final authority to set all rates and charges for
the electric utilitiea.
B. Public Utility Boards
The Public Utility Board, a five member board appointed
by the Council, serves as a consulting, advisory and
supeeVisory body. The Board is charged, by charter, to
act In an advisory capacity to the City Council, with
authority to hold public hearings and to study and
recommend policies relating to the operations I
promotion, enlargement, future planning and such other
matters as may be referred to it by the Council. All
rates and charges for utility services must be reviewed
by the Board and revised or re-enacted by the Council
at intervals not exceeding five (5) years.
j
C. Public Utility Commissions
The City of Denton is not subject to the jurisdiction
• of the Texas Public Utility Commission in rate getting
matters.
V. CONSULTANT OUALIFICATIONSr
A. Description of Consultin Firmi
The Consultant shall provide in the proposal a complete
and comprehensive description of the firm. The
proposal shall list the qualifications and background
of the firm in the field of electric utility rate and
PURPA compliance studies. The proposal shall list the
Project Manager and main staff support personnel to be
assigned to the project along with their respective
resumes'.
B. List of Previous Clients
f} The proposal shall provide a list of clients, including
the name and telephone number of the person who would
be most knowled eable, who have been provided
services b the Consultant within the similar
by past three (3)
• years-
'eg
r, 9
Si~'
C. `Expert T
estimonvt
The Consultant shall anticipate that personnel involved
and/or responsible for the development of the electric
rates and PURPA documentation may be, at a later time,
required to give expert teetimorty. Professional
service fees for such testimony shall be considered to
be in addition to the fees for the Electric Rate Study
and shall be listed separately as designated in Section {
h VIII(b) of this request for proposal,
VI. REPORTt
A. Time Frames
It is contemplated that selection of the Consultant and
authorization to commence work will be completed by,May
150 1980. Preliminary review and development of
revenue and expense projections shall be completed by
July 15, 1980, Final report shall be delivered by
September 15, 1980.-
B. Presentation of Reports
The Consultant shall
• one hundred (100) copies of the finale Electric Rate
Study Report and the PURPA Compliance Manual, After
delivery of the final report, the Consultant shall
present the report to a joint public meeting of. the 1
City Council and the Public Utility Board,
C, Steering Committees
A steering committee will be established by the Public
e` Utility P.oard, This committee will be composed of a
representative from the Council, Public Utility Board,
City Manager's office, and the Director of Utilities
"=K and Finance Director, The
will be to meet purpose of the committee
periodically with th4 Consultant to
3 review the progress of the Study and to provide input
as desired by the Consultant.
10
~sy s
'gib z
r
.rte
I
I
VII. PR^
_?OSALt
A, Format3
Each proposer shall provide four (4) copies of a
proposal outlining the Consultant's understanding of
the subject rate study and PURPA Compliance Manual, i
detailing the approach and methodology that will be
used. The proposal shall be in two parts,
(1) The Electric Rate Study and PURPA Compliance
Manual Proposal, addressing the understanding of I
the scope of works the firms' experience)
personnel and their qualifications and a client
reference lists and,
(2) The Price Proposal, detailing the
professional service fees.
B. Price Proposal
The Consultant shall submit a proposal stating the
general terms and conditions for services, plus
standard hourly rates of various categories of
personnel to be involved in thn Study. An estimate -af
manpower requirements shall be listed. Atotal "not to
exceed" cost for the Study shall be submitted.
The Consultant shell list separately the estimated
manpower and "not to exceed" cost associated with the
PURPA Compliance Manual portion of the work. In the
event the overall cost of the Rate plus the PURPA ;
Compliance Manual exceeds budget allocation, the Public
4 Utility Board may remove the PURPA Compliance Manual
from the scope of work. i
C. Presentation of Proposalsa
A committee composed of the Utility Board Chairman, j
City Manager, Director of Utilities ar.d Finance
Director -till review the pproposals and select three
proposals that are determinod to beat produve the
desired Study. Representatives of the three successful
proposers will be requested to appear at the meeting of
the Publio Utility Board on Wednesday, April 30, 1980,
at 730 PM at the City Hall. Each Consultant will be
allowed twenty minutes to present their proposal. A 1
recommended selection will be made and forwarded to the
City Council for their consideration at their May 13,
1980, meeting.
* r
Y
1
D. Evaluation:
Due to the nature of the Study, the technical portion
of the proposals submitted will be the most important
consideration in award and should, therefore, be
complete and specific. Although cost may not be a
controlling factor in the evaluation process, it will
none-the-less be considered in the negotiation and
award of the Study. The City of Denton will perform an
overall best-value analysis which will consider the
technical proposal, cost analysis and ability to
perform to the requirements as proposed. The City of
Denton reserves the right to make an award in the best
interest of the City of Denton, all factors
considered. In additioh, the City of Denton reserves
tha right to reject all proposals and resolicit in the
event no adequate and fully responsive proposals are
received and negotiations fail to provide mutually
satisfactory results,
h
ti
A,
w
e
12
IUF14~
EXHIBIT II
PROPOSAL TO
CITt OF DENTON, TEXAS
FOR AN
ELECTRIC RATE STUDY
AND
PURPA COMPLIANCE MANUAL
BY
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC,
APRIL, 1980
d,
y*
efje t
'sa VOLUME ONE
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
E ;
4R
yp
I
I
MARC A Professional Consulting Group
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. 3408 Lindell Boulevard
St, Louis, Missouri 89103
John C. Pickett Ph. o. (314) 531.3370
Fred Morlerty, C.PA,
1404rd P. Anthony
1
April 21, 1980
I
I
Mr. R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
City of Denton
215 r. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Nelsons
Management And Research Consultants, Inc. (MARC) proposes to
conduct an electric rate study and develop a PURPh Compliance
Manual for the City of Denton. Dr. John C. Pickett, past
Chairman of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and a national
authority in electric rate design, will be thelprdoeje tm nagettif
MARC is selected to perform this engagement.
leadership as Chairman of the Arkansas Commission► the Arkansas
j Power and Light Company became one of the leadinq utilities in
the country in the areas of innovative rates annydon load management.
He has e Congresse during national their evaenetg luati fiPURPA. and
testified before
MARC is a group of professional consultants offering
i' economic and financial services to state and local government.
We offer the City of Denton a project team with a unique
combination of experience in utility regulation, direot utility
management and several yearr. of utility consulting. We employ
only experienced professionals and thus avoid the turnover and
on-the-job training problems common to larger diversified firms.
I will assist Dr. Pickett as Technical Advisor with the
development of total revenue requirements, allocation of costs to
customer classes and preparation of the final report. My own
background includes six years of financial consulting to
government owned utilities and utility regulatory agencies. I am
a Certified Public; Accountant and have testified on utility
andaseveralsstaee bpublic tservicercomnissioneegulatory Commissions
Richard Anthony and Leigh Riddick will participate in the
cost of service and rate design activities. Mr. Anthony and Ms.
Riddick have extensive experience in direct government opara i on
s
k
4011
I
I ,
and regulation of ele.tric utilities. Mr. Anthony was Utilities
Comptroller and Director of Finance for two Missouri cities prior
joining the consulting profession. His responsibilities
included customer services, cost studies and fuel adjustment
clauses. Ms. Riddick has several years experience as an economic
consultant and public service commission rate analyst in which
she has testified on numerous issues related to utility cost of
service and rate design.
I
MARC proposes a program approach that w+,," be directed
toward identifying and implementing cost of c4rvice and rate
design principles that will assure that the City of Denton will
ultimately achieve the goals set out in PURPA. The stiategie
objectives of increased efficiency, conservation and equity will
form the basic rate design prinoi}•les toward which the entir6
engagement will be directed. At your request, we have presented
our proposal in two parts. Volume I contains the Technical
Proposal and Volume II contains the Price Proposal.
We hope the enclosed proposal adequately describes our
purpose, approach and qualifications and that you will select
MARC to perform this important engagement. Please call Ur.
Pickott at (501) 327-3482 or tae at (314) 531-3370 if you have any
questions regarding our firm or this proposal.
M
Very truly Yours,
n
Fred Moriarty
FJM t sw
~ t{
J 4
J
s{Y
r.
T'•;
Fyt
c
I
~4.
~qf,,... . .....i.. ...tea.. rn ...........a...n s.muvata0.: w.. ♦.nr . i.. . •
I
M PROPOSAL TO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
FOR AN
ELECTRIC RATE STUDY
AND
PURPA COMPLIANCE MANUAL
pfL { BY
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC,
APRIL, 1980
)~9 t .
T
~a
VOLUME ONE
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL '
r_
K;
TP.Ir
*71
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
VO. LUME ONE
Introduction 2
Approach 4
Financial Analysis 4
Cost of Service b
Rate Design 10
PURPA Compliance Manual 14
Qualifications, References and Resumes 17
VOLUME TWO
Price Proposal 2
i
•b
i0i
4
T
1
TX T
iln.+q
ISTRODUCTION
In
1978, Congress passed the Public Utility Regulatory
Policies Act (PURPA), Title I of which establishes federal
ratemaking and regulatory standards, lifeline rate guidelines,
and coat-of-service data requirements. The federal ratemaking
standards address cost of service, load management techniques
(including interruptible rates), and declining block, time-of-day
(TOD), and seasonal rates. These standards, as well as the other
provisions of Title I, were established to promote three
objectives: the conservation of electricity by customers, the
efficient use of facilities and resources by electric utilities,
and the provision of equitable rates to customers.
Under the provisions of Title I, state regulatory authcci-
ties and nonregulated utilities are required to complete a formal
consideration of these ratemaking standards by 1981 and determine
if they (1) promote conservation, efficiency, and equity, and (2)
are consistent with state law. As pact of this formal considera-
tion, the regulatory authorities are required to hold hearings on
these standards. Such hearings can either be on a case-by-case
basis as part of general rate cae)s or be evidentiary, generic
i hearings.
The City of Denton Charter requires that the rates and
charges of the Utility Department be reviewed by the Public
Utility Board at least each five years. The capital structure
and debt service requirements of the City of Denton's electric
system are changing as a result of the transfer of generation
facility financing from Denton to TMPA. These changes will have
a direct effect on previously developed rate structures. 1
To meet its obligations under PURPA and City Charter, the
City of Denton has requested proposals for an Electric Rate Study {
and the development of a PURPA Compliance Manual to assure that
electric rates correctly reflect the cost to provide electric
service and to develop an action plan in response to the mandates
of PURPA.
It is important to note that, although PURPA language
designates cost of servics as a ratemaking standard along with
declining block, TOD, ceasonal# and interruptible rates, cost-
based rates, not cost-of-service studied, are the means by which
PURPA's objectives of conservation, efficiency, and equity can be
achived. However, coat-of-service studies are required to design
cost-based rates. Therefore, it is not possible to evaluate
either the coat-of-service standard or any rate types indepen-
dently,
A cost-of-service study allocates the utility's total
jurisdiction according to the actual costs of providing
electricity to that jurisdiction or group. Rates based on cost-
2
~.0
111 .
of-service study results will represent a significant step toward
meeting PURPA's objectives of conservation, efficiency, and
equity. First, because cost-based rates reflect, to the greatest
extent possible, the true costs of providing utility services,
and, as such, will increase as these costs increase, consumers
will be motivated to conserve electricity (and, hence, the fuels
used to generate that electricity). Second, efficient electric-
ity production will be indirectly encouraged because a major goal
of utility regulation is to ensure least cost construction,
investment, and fuel purchase by utilities. To justify and
design cost-based rates, regulators will have to examine closely
the utilities' rate bases and expenses (which are identified in
cost-of-service studies), tisulting in identification of any
inefficient production. Finally, rates will be equitable if
customer groups are charged on the basis of cost of service
reflecting the customers' relative demands on the system,
consumption, and steed for related services.
F
fK
r
1 4 ~
s1
M
r ~r 1
5
M*w
r 3
V"M+Xiy
APPROACH
We have structured our proposed workplan such that we can
minimize the time required to compile the data requirements
necessary to meet four primacy objectives:
1. Provide an accurate projection of revenue require-
ments for a period of five (5) years necessary to
meet current debt service and discretionary
transfer regirements.
2. Determine the relative customer class load charac-
teristics and the resulting peak load cost of
service responsibilities for each rate class of
customer.
3. Design customer class rates that beat meet the
PURPA ratemaking standards while minimizing the
level of departure from historical rates and
current rate making practices of Texas utilities.
4. Compile a PURPA Compliance Manual that will
ultimately enable the City of Denton to meet its
annual filing requirement to the Department of
Energy (DOE) as required by PURPA.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
MARC will utilize the "Cash Requirements" approach for
making financial projections of an electric utility
a of assumptions or projections concerning demand# capital.
expenditures, operating costs, and financial policies. The
purpose of this process, particularly where multiple year
projections are required, is to aid in determining the
implications of changes in City policy, economic conditions, or
cost estimates for the Utility's external financing, required
revenues and financial health, These changes are usually
x
interactive, and their effects are often complex and time
consuming to compute, The direct "Cash Requirements" approach
reduces the drudgery and time associated with analyzing
historical and future costa and the resultingg revenue
y requirements. The reduced anslytieal time and cost etficieneies
available through this approach manifest themselves in an
increased scope and depth of analysis regarding financial
assumptions rather than do unnecessary processinq of more data,
Projected capital and operating expenditures provided by the
Utility Staff will be combined with forecasts of system operating
parameters (such as annual consumption, number of customers, new
r.i
ptq II
4
I
I
construction and changes in generation) to project revenue
requirements for five (5) years. During this process, judgement
will be exercised with respect to the input data. For example,
historical data may not be a good indicator of future costs if
they include the effects of a major storm. We will attempt to
identify such situations for additioial analysis and, if
necessary, prepare direct estimates of future costs.
` The first task in the financial analysis requires two types
of information. The first type to historical which consists of
the latest available ending ialances of plant, CWIP and
accumulated depreciation. It also requires information to
calculate depreciation rates for plant. The other type of
information required is projected, which consists of annual
construction expenditures, retirements, and plant in service
additions, for each plant category.
Operations and maintenance expense (0 6 M) will be provided
by the Utility Staff and evaluated independently to determine the
effect on long run revenue requirements. This evaluation will be
done with constant (inflation adjusted) dollars to avoid
excessive weighting of values caused by high inflation. we will
1 compute these constant dollar amounts using different inflation
indices for different accounts if necessary.
Projections of operations and maintenance costs requires two
types of data - historical costs and measures of physical
activity or service. The historical costs will be based on the
FERC Uniform accounts although other special coding requirements I
of the Denton Electric Utility may also be used. The measures of
activity most frequently used area
I
o Kwh generation
' o Kw peak load 1
o Kw peak capability
i o Number of customers
f Projections are accomplished by supplying forecasts of the
independent vAriables specified in the input (e.g., peak load and
=4 energy consumption) and calculating the value of eaci~ major
expense item for each future year of the projection. Very
accurate computation of important cost items is possible using
this technique.
The current debt service schedule will be incorporated into ,
the revenue projections along with projections of interest and
principal payments of new issues. This will enable us to project
the total annual interest and principal payments on outstanding
and newly issued debt for each year of the forecast period.
The next task is to calculate total required revenues and
all the relevant financial parameters necessary to develop pro
forma sources and uses of funds statements. During this task we
u
S
d
n
[VL1
consolidate all the relevant financial projections and policies
regarding internally generated capital. The basis for the
financial calculations is the attainment of an income figure that
meets all the specified requirements. We then develop an income
statement from the bottom up. Income is calculated first, then
interest, operating expenses and finally revenue requirements.
COST OF SERVICE
The traditional theory regarding cost of service has been
that over-all revenue requirements are of first importance and
rates are a compromise between theory and practice. Proponents
I~ of this theory have indicated that costs are an allocation of
investment and expenses but not necessarily a measure of
reasonable rates. This policy generally leads to the following
guidelines
1. Costs can serve as a guide with 'the value of
service as the upper limit and the incremental
cost as the lower limit on rates.
I
26 The continuity of gross revenues and class rates
was of prime importance with cost being used
primarily to demonstrate inequity between rates.
Cost of Service proponents have argued that cost based rates
provide other benefits in addition to the equitable rate concept.
1. Cost of service provides an objective, understand-
able and quantifiable basis to compare rate
classes and to measure the effects of non-cost
based decisions.
2. Cost studies assure that services are not priced
below their incremental cost and provide a means
to measure changing cost relationships.
36 Rates b,ised on the cost of service encouragco wise
economic decisions and a more effieisnt use of
resources.
The PURPA Cost of Service Standard recognizes that rates
should reflect the cost of service and has adopted the stronger
~f osition that customer class rates should reflect the costs
incurred to serve a class. An accurate cost of service study is
necessary to meet PURPA
goals because cost-based rates will
encourage conservation and indirectly encourage more efficiency
~r in production of electricity. Cost based rates are still
considered to be an equitable distribution of total revenues
34";
1Y l-
U t
I
.
between customer classes.
Cost studies are also required to evaluate the other PURPA
rate standards and regulatory bodies and unregulated utilities
should strive to adopt a standard cost of service methodology.
1. A standard methodology requires the identification
of class time of use cost differentials including
seasonal and daily uses.
2. A standard methodology must identify the func-
tional components of demand, energy and customers.
' 3. The PURPA implies the use of marginal costs by
time of use but allows accounting cost of service.
i Utilities and regulators have generally been more familiar
with and receptive to accounting cost of service because embedded
cost issues are usually easier to understand and embedded costs
generally provide a reasonable estimate of past and present class
costs.
We will provide a detailed peak responsibily fully
distributed embedded cost study to determine the cost
responsibility of current customer classes. The accounting cost
based methodology requires the selection of a test period, a
segregation of directly assignable class costs, and then a
meticulous and mechanical process of allocating costs to utility
functions, rate jurisdictions and customer classes. MARC has the
computer capabilities to automate the cost of service allocations
according to the following taskso
r' A, The functional cost allocation distributes
historical costs among customer related services
which are dependent on the number of customers,
demand related costs which are a function of
j maximum demand (KW) and energy related expenses
~s
which directly vary with epsrgy production (KWH),
y7.
1. Generation plant costs are incurred in the
production of steam, nuclear, hydraulic or
pumped storage and other types of electric
generation.
n. The demand related portion reflects the
fixed carrying costs of generating
units.
t
b. The energy related costs reflect the
variable components of generation such
as fuel.
r
M 7
j
i
I
CNi~
I
. A4Y'4Tq ,
2. Transmission plant costs are incurred to
change the voltage or frequency of
electricity or to connect sources of power
supply.
a. The change of voltage or frequency can
occur at the generation station or point
of receipt for purchased power for more
efficient transmission.
b. Transmission plant can connect a
generating point and the entrance to a
distribution center or wholesale point.
i
C* Transmission usually considered demand
related because of the design to meet
i peak loads.
3. Distribution plant costs are incurred to
Ir connect the primary source of electricity
supply and delivery to customers which are
not included in the transmission system
costs.
4 a. Distribution can include costs to change
electricity from transmission to
distribution voltage level.
b. Costs are demand related if incurred to
meet maximum customer group demands.
.
c. Costs are cur,tomer related if required
to connect customers to the system such
as distribution and meter equipment.
4. Common utility plant Le used in common for
several utility services or for other
purposes which make it impractical to
segregate it by utility services.
' S. General plant includes property not properly
includable in other accourate.
a. General plant can include land and
f structures.
b. General plant includes items such as
office furniture, transportation,
stores, shop and garage tools,
laboratory, communication and power
oporated equipment.
uFP
l,y
r
E ,
B. The customer class allocation distributes
historical costs among rate jurisdictions and
among customer classes.
1. Customer class allocations depend on
identification of customer classes and the
collection of customer class data.
a. A class implies a homogeneous grout of
customers with similar service
requirements and costs within a defined
range of diversity.
b. Similar characteristics include voltage
or service levels, usage patterns, time
of use, duration of use and quantity of
uses
c. Customer class alloes.tions require the
following types of data:
i
o metered energy sales
o Average and maximum demands
o Demand at time of system peak
o Primary or secondary service
o Allocated line losses
o Load size and type of service such
as distribution lines, customer
service, metering and customer
accounting.
i 2. Demand related generation and transmission
costs are most accurately measured in a
k.,= coincident or modified coincident peak
' method.
ae Coincident peak measures class peaks at
l the time of system peak and assumes the
k Via; system peak is the primary determinant
of capacity.
x,. b, An average peak is appropriate whets a
system experiences successively larger
' seasonal peaks, multiple peaks of
comparable level or changing peak
' per iod.
A
stem-
C. oc)currenceenbypdi tribstingesytime of
diversity independent of peak. This
method does not recognize contribution
to system diversity and, therefore,
penalizes off-peak users.
,t
1
9
d. The benefits of the hybrid method
referred to as Average and Excess are
unclear. It incorporates the sum of the
average and proportion of system excess
according to a prescribed formula.
3. Energy related costs are distributed to rate
jur`i.dictions and customer classes according
to energy consumption adjusted for line
losses.
4. Customer related costs are distributed
according to the absolute or adjusted
equivalent number of customers.
Cost based rates can be readily determined by comparing the
total class functional coats by the equivalent number of
functional units.
A. A monthly customer cost is determined by dividing
the total class customer costs by the number of
customers in the class and dividing the result by
12 (months) .
b. A demand cost is determined by dividing the total
class demand costs by the total demand (KW) of the
¢ class.
C. A flat energy cost is determined by dividing the
total class energy costa by the total energy
consumption (KWN) of the class.
41'
aA;
RATE DESIGN
Rate design is the process of assigning the total revenue
y requirements to customer groups so that the sum of the accounting
f costs assigned to each customor group equals the total revenue
requirement. The rate design objectives of the National Energy
Act are conservation, efficiency and equity. It is essential
aR that all rates be reviewed so that each may be evaluated in terns
of its contribution towards achieving these objectives, Our
4 approach to designing rates that meet these objectives includes
x: the following tasks.
A. Define the characteristic load curve which the
utility system anticipates it will be required to
serve.
10
iio
{
I
i
f 1. Define the present load curve.
2. Define the expected load curve upon which the
utility's capital expansion plan is based.
e. Separate .he load curve into periods which era
4 served by generating units which have diffarznt
I capital-fuel mixes.
1. The load curve may have a distinct seasonal
pattern which, if prosent, must be
recognized.
2. The diurnal, weekly, and seasonal period may
be identified by inspeution, loss of load
probability or a comparison of actual loads
to the generating mix used to meet the loads,
3. Estimate the incremental running costs (fuel i
and fuel related operation and maintenance
f costs) during each period.
t ;
C. Estimate the incremental capacity and transmission
costs necessary to serve the load during each
period.
D. Estimate the incremental distribution costs.
1. Estimate incremental losses at each load and
voltago level in order to adjust the costs in
"83" and "C" above.
5 26 Estimate incremental customer costs.
3. Estimate incre:ental distribution costs.
E. Calculate a set of tariffs for each time period
based on the costs previously estimated.
' P. Compare the incentives offered by the tariffs
proposed in "E" with the incentives embodied in
the present tariff structure.
11 Do thR present and propossd tariffs convey to
consumers, that costs vary between consumption
periods and between load And voltage levels?
G. Compare the cost of metering with the benefits of
v
consumers responding to the proper incentives.
1. Complex metering is only justified for
consumers who will (or are able to) respond
.
i
r
~1
to the tariff incontives.
2. Where monthly KWH metering and a distinct
seasonal load pattern exist, seasonal KWH
tariffs may be designed which convey the
significant seasonal e!jst differentials at
negligible additional !tering costs.
H. Compare the revenue forthcoming from the proposed
tariffs with the accounting revenue requirement.
1. Modify the proposed tariffs which causes
least disturbance in the relationship among
the costs among the rating periods.
2. Employ the inverse elasticity rule to satisfy
the accounting revenue requirement.
MARC will also develop an experimental time-of-day rate and
propose an implementation plan for a maximum of 25 customers.
These rates will be designed to reflect the long run marginal
costa of providing electric service to these cuetomer"
different times of day.
i The long run marginal cost based tariffs are a forward
looking analysis which estimates the costs associated with
increasing or decreasing load and energy along the utilities
expected load curve. We will obtain an annual load curve from
the system dispatcher or system planning engineer which is
representative of the demand which will be placed upon the
system. We will then identify the diurnal, weekly and seasonal
periods which impose similar costs upon the system, The relevant
periods may be identified from information provided by tEe system
dispatcher or by a loss of load probability analysis.
The next task will be to obtain the generation trans.aission,
distribution, fuel and fuel related operation and mLUtanance
expense developed during the cost study. The relevant coats are
only those which the system would incur or avoid if the utility
ex erienced a change in its load curve during each period.
Additions to generating capacity are only incurred if consumers
take more (or less) KW during the peak.
In convecting these long run marginal costs into tariffs, we
will attempt to maintain the cost relationship between the rafting
periods and satisfy the accounting revenue requirement.
The appropriate method for determining the marginal cost
based rate relationship with the required accounting level should
consider the following criteria.
A. Insertion of the estimated marginal costs will
result in revenues exceeding the accounting
12
i
i
i
-T
tTJY.~
y1"AC .
revenue requirement.
B. Employ the inverse elasticity rule to modify
tariffs to insure the revenue constraint is not
violated.
C. Adjust the customer charge first.
D. Adjust the monthly non-coincident demand charge
second,
E. Never price peak or off peak energy at less than
the average system lambda which exists for each
time period.
There are no traditionally defined customer groups for time-
of-dap tar iffa. A group is defined in terms of service voltage
level. The costs imposed upon the system are a function of
voltage level and time and do not vary as to the services
performed by the electricity for a particular customer.
There is a trade-off between the metering cost and the
extent to which the schedule of rates will provide the proper
incentives. Some of these area
A, metering costs rise little as the size of the
customer increases but the benefits increase
significa.%tly.
B. Responses to incentives increase as consumption
becomes less time dependent.
C. Oiler the customer a choice between an opportunity
to obtain the benefits of time of use rates and
the additional metering cost.
rt, D, With only monthly KWB metering, seasonal KWH rates
are an excellent substitute for TOU rates,
j
We will evaluate the seasonal changes in system costs to
determine if seasonal differentials should be built into all or
some of the proposed rate schedules, Other rate designs will be
evaluated and reviewed with City officials and integrated into
a..
the proposed rate schedules as appropriate. These alternatives
will includes
<r ;
Interruptible rates for industrial and commercial
customers
Lifeline rates similar to the present A-1 rate for
summer usage less than 700 Kwh
Customer produced energy rates for customer owned
13
jR, ~
F
rs wu ,
energy systems that may provide excess generation
to the grid
r
Energy charge adjustment to recover increases in fuel
and purchased power costs
Load management techniques
PURPA COMPLIANCE MANUAL
Title I and III of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
of 1978 is the codification by the U.S. Congress of its concerns
in the area of electric and natural gas ratemaking, Not only has
PURPA addressed the areas that it wishes an in-depth analysis to
be conducted, but also, it has set out the standards with which
decision makers must evaluate the facts regarding each issue.
PURPA sets out with greater precision the three standards
€ for evaluating the facts brought to bear on any issue. The
standards are the three objectives which PURPA seeks to achiever
efficiency, conservation, and equity. Central to our approach is
that the evidence bearing upon the six certain ratemaking
standards (Title If Subtitle 8, Sec. 111 of Public Law 95-617)0
and five policy standards (Title If Subtitle 8, Sec. 113 of
Pudic Law 95-617).
A. Conservation of ener
utilitiesi 9Y supplied by electric
f 8. The optimization of the efficiency of use of
facilities and resources by electric utilitiesi
and
C. Equitable rates to electric consumers,
We will develop a Compliance Manual that addresses five
activities. The first is determining the order in which an
examination of the ratemaking standards, policy standards and
required customer data should be conducted. Second, after the
standards are ordered, proposed rules are to be drafted and
submitted for comment. Third, a hearing on each standard will be
conducted, Fourth, a summary of the evidence would be prepared
and recommendations will be submitted to the City Council for its
decision, Fifth, reports on all activities are to be prepared
for the DOE.
The preparation of the proposed man+jal requires a number of
subtasks, An evaluation must be completed to determine if the
City has previously adopted the standards in whole or in part,
Most of the information regarding the City's current status
14
PAP T-'
relative to compliance with the PURPA standards will be obtained !
during the development of customer class load and cost of service
characteristics undertaken during the rate study. The major
effort during this phase of the engagement, therefore, will be
to summarize the City's current status relative to PURPA and to
develop an action plan directed toward timely compliance with all
the PURPA requirements.
The action plan will present a practical framework within
which the City of Denton can consider the applicability of the
rate design, utility practices, and the lifeline rate standards.
In addition, it will describe the additional activities that will
have to be undertaken to obtain the customer class load data
required under Section 133 of the PURPA requirements. The manual
will also contain a proposed public hearing process which will be
developed around the following general guidelines. If a standard
has not been adopted, then the costs and benefits to both {
investors and consumers must be identified if the standard is and
is not adopted. The costs and benefits are established witfiTn
the framework of efficiency, conservation and equity. This
information regarding coats and benefits should them be put in
the form of a proposed rulemaking.
I
The technique of a proposed rulemaking has certain
advantages for City decision making, The most important is that
4 it permits the City to define specific issues for which it
solicits responses. The definition of specific issues will
induce interested parties to prepare a more thoughtful and narrow
response as opposed to a rambling, loosely prepared response.
Another advantage is that it helps to eliminate non-issues which
leads to more efficient use of time and Staff.
After a proposed rulemaking is submitted for public comment,
the public response must be evaluated in terms of efficiency,
conservation and equity. Summaries of the public response must
be prepared and submitted to the City Council for its decision,
The summaries may also be used when preparing the annual reports
to the DOE.
P_reraration of Annual Reports Required Under PURPA
As a correlary to the consideration of the PURPA standards,
relevant information will become available which will provide the
necessary factual data upon which the year end reports to DOE may
be based, The manual will include a description of the task
required to assure that all data is obtained and summarised by
Staff prior to the deadlines for submission to DOB,
Cast of Service Accounting
The Federal Energy' Regulatory Commission's adoption of sec.
is
$POO'
*
M
i
I
I
133 - Filing Requirements - provides
the unique source of cost
and load data +3pon which cost of service analysis may be based.
The FERc is currently developing the format under which this data
is to be submitted.
There are many methodologies upon which a cost of service
study may be based. The mechanism for determining whether one
methodology is superior to another is to compare the prices
charged a customer with the costs incurred by the electric
utility when the customer increases his load (KW) or onergy (RWH)
requirements, our approach sets out the tasks which will insure
a comprehensive body of information is available for review
during future rate studies.
i .
i
i
B
t
e
i
1b
d~
ri
A STATEMENT
OF FIRM QUALIFICATIONS Z
AND A Z
v
DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF SERVICES
I
i I
Y t
*f • • 1
~y
son
r
1
WAA
5
•
u
3400 LINDELL OLVD
1 St, IOVIS, MISSOVAl 03103
10101il1.3St0
rte.
BAC$GROUND
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INCi (MARL) is a group
of professional consultants and skilled techncians specializing
in the application of innovative, modern management and research
techniques to solving business problems. The educational
background of our staff includes economics, finance, data
processing, and management. Nearly all the members of our
professional staff have served in key management positions in
exper ience rbefore ijoining nMizat ARC ion We ha el joi ed togethern tol form
a dynamic management consulting organization which we feel can
bring to our clients the maximum skill and experience at
competitive rates.
Our services are specialized in these areast
o Financial Management and Cost Accounting
o Data Processing Services
o Utility Regulation and Rate Design
TUB MARC APPROACO
MARC's approach to consulting and data processing is
designed to bring to the service of our client a maximum level of
skill and experience in an effort directed to efficiently and
effectively solve his unique problems,
` MARC will y analysis 1
requirements without oobligation ito the clientA seniorlmember
of the consulting staff with experience in similar engagements
will review with you or your staff situations in which you
perceive consulting or data processing services may present a
f, practical and cost effective solution. This analysis wily
o Assist you to clarify the nature and scope of the
problem,
o Identify the particular combination of experience,
' technical skills, and machine and human resources
necessary to effect a successful solution or
solutions,
o Provide an estimate of the time, effort and expense
which your organization will be likely to incur in
pursuing various solutions,
,X
Y
asaia
When MARC is engaged to perform a consulting engagement, a
senior staff member is identified and assigned the responsibility
of successfully directing the progress of the engagement. He is
assisted as required by othek professional and technical stag.
Prior to each engagement, a proposed approach including
specification of the hours to be spent by each MARC staff member
is agreed to with the client. Project progress and changes in
methodology are reviewed with the client through frequent
meetings and reports. We feel MARC's approach to consulting
offers these distinct advantages:
o More time is spent on each engagement by senior,
i experienced consultants. This maximizes the
expertise with which you and your staff will have
daily contact and decreases tho incidences of
'l misdirection or mistakes due to inexperience.
o The billing rates of our senior staff members are
generally competitive with other firms, although we
employ only experienced consultants, We do not
believe in on-the-job training at our clients'
expense. Because we do not support a large
administrative overhead of a separate corporate
office, national advertising, college recruiting and
training and similar expensea, our highly qualified
consultants can spend more hours on an engagement
while remaining within the client's budget,
o Our approach to an engagement is tailored to the
needs of the client because we work with the client
' to define the problem and to formulate solutions,
We do not assume that a solution which worked
elsewhere is the optimal solution.
o During each engagement we strive for the optimum
y: balance of patticipation between our staff and
yours. A successful solution is one in which the
mechanism for change is developed with the aid of
'r the consultant and implemented by the client's
.E staff, using the knowledge and akil!s developed
through mutual involvement,
w t? i I
i
I
s
Some of the services offered by MARC area
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND CASE MANAGEMENT AND REVENUE
PROCEDURES REVIEW
o Design and installation of o Detig n of cash management
accounting system controls procedures and reports
and procedures
o Review of accounts rsceiv-
o Development of procedural able and accounts payable
manuals and report formats balances
17 conforming with generally o Review of inventor control
accepted accounting Stan- y
dards and purchasing policies
j o Design and documentation of o Analysis of debt management
an account cost structure
to provide the data base
for an automated financial
management system, cost ac-
counting or financial pro- BUDGETARY SYSTEMS AND
jectione CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING
0 Design of budgetary control
systems
CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING
i o Design and documentation
o Design of controls and pro- program budgeting systems
~r cedures unique to order
r troly processing and con- 0 Capital expenditure plan- ~
ning
o Development of billing and
x cash receipts systems
~y I
Mw. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
STUDIES
ka o Economic evaluation of pro-
posed investments
0 Siring of security issues
4
o Revenue and debt service
projections
f
1
1 YY/0.Li~
I
INV W.
I
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS
The processing of accounting, billing, financial planning,
word processing and other applications through the use of a
computer can be a complex and expensive proposition. A ,
computerized system requires planning before installation.
Proper staffing, strict data gathering procedures and sound
accounting controls must be provided to ensure correct
information for processing in the automated portion of the
system. Similarly, installation of the automated system requires
planning to ensure that the system will meet your organization's
needs, that staff is properly trained, and that the proper
documentation is produced. Since a proper system evolves with
use, it will require on-going support to modify or correct
program and procedures. MARC's experienced staff offers a wide
range of data processing services along the entire spectrum.
Some of the data processing services offered aret
DATA PROCESSING FEASIBILITY LONG RANGE DATA PROCESSING
STUDY PLANNING
t 0 Development of a statement o Development of a statement
of management information of data processing goals
needs and goals and objectives which are
consistent with overall
o Delineation of costs and organizational objectives I
} benefits of alternatives and information needs
for meeting these goals and
needs o Assessment of user require-
meats to develop a set of
o Analysis of organization, specifications hardware and
staffing, facilities and software staffing configur-
other support requirements ations towards which the
organization should be
x, moving
i? STAFF TRAINING SEMINARS o Development of a strategy, j
i a list of specific tasks, a
o General orientation for key timetable and definition of
management staff in the staff responsibility for
s% capabilities, benefits and implementing this plan
requirements of data pro-
ceasing
o Discussion of the require-
ments and problems in
automating accounting and
financial management func-
tions
o Discussion of how to bid
r and acquire data processing
services
is
IEF~
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS, Continued
HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE RE-IMPLEMENTATION OR
SELECTION CONVERSION REVIEW
o Development of specifics-
tion and system require- o Review of management infor-
ments for hardware or mation goals, organization
software and staffing
o Development of a set of o identification of specific
criteria for evaluating tasks required for imple-
hardware or software ven- mentation or conversion
does
o Development of an implemen-
o Preparation of a request tation or conversion plan
for proposal to hardware or and timetable
software vendors
o Development of specifics-
o operational and economic tion for system output and
evaluation of proposed of tests for ensuring that
alternatives the automated system is
producing valid information
o Review of manual data
1 AUTOMATED SYSTEM DESIGN collection procedures, ac-
AND ANALYSIS counting procedures and
standards, and review of
o Design and development of clerical and operator
programming specifications procedures
for automated systems for
billing and collection, in- o Design of documentation
ventory control, revenue standards for program in-
projections and financial stallation, conversion and
c modeling, personnel re- modification
ra, cords, and other applica-
tions lending themselves to o Review of backup and system
ell
eY automation security procedures
o Development of operational o Development and impleman-
ax. procedures and standards tation of staff training
for the above systems requirements
o Provision of staff training
r};
5
NlrM~
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS, Continued
INDEPENDENT ELECTRONIC
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM
REVIEW AND AUDIT
o Review of EDP planning and
policies and analysis of
how well these meet organ-
izational information needs
o Review of scheduling proce-
dures, and the efficient
use of human resources
o Review of documentation
procedures, programming
controls, procedures for
file back-up
o Review of EDP facilities
for security, efficient age
of equipment and proper
j design of application Soft-
ware
~F
o Review of data collection,
data conversion and tata
processing control
o Review of the applicability
of reports to information
needs and review c,f
information ditj~ersal and
transmission procedures
III
I
r •f14~
UTILITY MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION
MARC principals and staff have had considerable experience
in utility regulation and financial management. Some of the
services we offer in this field includes
i
LOAD FORECASTING AND REGULATORY. PRACTICES
POWER PLANNING i
o Analysis of long term capa- o Evaluation of general ap-
city and energy forecasting proach to processing of
required for informed util- utility rate increases
r ity management and planning
o Examination of regulatory ~
o Feasibility studies of al- relations with state and
ternative power supplies, federal regulators and con-
water resources and waste Sumer-groups
water treatment programs
o Definition of minimum data
J o Provisiun for fuel plan- requirements needed for
ning, supply availability processing rate increases
j studies, and inventory
control systems
I.
UTILITY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FOR ELECTRIC, WATER,.
SEWER AND CABLE TELEVISION OR OTHER UTILITIES
o Development of a statement o Analysis of debt obliga-
7a' of financial goals, objec- tion load issue sizing,
tives and policies on such timing and debt amortiza-
items as capital structure, tion scheduling
internall y generated capi-
tall debt service coverage, u Analysis of regulatory,
etc. statutory, and covenant re-
strictions or requirements
o Long term financial plan-
ing including modeling of o Identification and racom-
funding sourcee and uses, mendation of an appropriate -
analysis debt service re- methodology for defining
5`s quirements and exploration system revenue requirements
of other financing strat-
egies o Analysis of revenue re-
quirements required for
c o Cash management analysis utility cost of service and
including lead/log study rate stsidies
for receivables and pay-
ables, alternative billing
` schemes, debt scheduling
~;.M
R~
UTILITY MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION, Continued
ELECTRIC, WATER, SEWER AND
CABLE TELEVISION COST OF UTILITY ACCOUNTING AND
SERVICE STUDIES FINANCIAL REPORTING
o Identify and reccmmend ap-
propriate methodologies o Design specification and
(historical, marginal, peak implementation of account-
load, etc.) for allocating ing systems and controls
costs among service classes for utilities including
accounting and financial
o Evaluate alternative cust- reporting, accounts receiv-
omer claesi£ications based able, billing and cash
upon homogeneous use char- receipts processing, ac-
acteristics counts payable processing
and cash management, fuels
o Analysis of revenue re- inventory control, shop
quired from each customer inventory control, and
j class based on current fixed asset accounting
costs, revenue received or
variable rates of return by o Design of cost accounting
customer class systems and manual and
automated cost allocation
procedures which provide
detailed information for
FPC and other regulatory
UTILITY TARIFF DESIGN reporting, cost studies and
financial planning
o Definition of goals, pol-
icies and objectives f,)r o Development of forms of
such things as innovative procedures and methods for
rate design, encourgement Capital Expenditure plan-
of conservation through ning
mates, load management,
' cogeneration, etc.
o Exploration of alternative
rate designs to meet the
,y above objectives
~y
o K Design of a tariff and
testing of tariff calcu-
lation to verify expected
revenues
o Analysis for price-demand
sensitivity studies
3?`
Pf
z-
4f GfiA
MARC CLENTS AND REFERENCES
Arkansas Power and Light Company
Mr. Jerry L. Mauldin, President
(501) 371-4000
Mr. Paul Rogers, General Council
National Association of Regulatory commissions
(202) 628-7325
Central and South West Corporation
Mr. Fred Frawley, Attorney
(214) 748-8481
Federal Energy'Regulatory Commission
Mr. Jack Lahey, Staff Counsel
(202) 357-8574
City of Columbia, Missouri
Mr. David Wollersheim, Chairman
Water and Light Advisory Board
(314) 882-6560
City of Columbia, Missouri
Mr. Harold Boldt, Director of Finance
(314) 874-7366
City of Webster Groves, Missouri
Mr. Michael Brown, Finance Director
(314) 961-4100
r
A
J
4Y'
7
Y
a
~ I
......,.,r..... .'num...,.,...... r..-.r...o-.
h
RESUME
JOHN C. PICKETT
EMPLOYMENT: Chairman - June 1977 - January 1979
Commissioner - May 1975 - June 19770
January, 1979 - February, 1980
Arkansas Public Service Commission
Associate Professor of Economics, 1973-1975
Hendrix College
Conway, Arkansas
Assistant Professor of Business Economice,
1968-19711 1973
University of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii
s: Research Fellow, 1971-1973
Urban Research Unit
Australian National University
Canberra, A.C.T.
EDUCATION: Ph. D., Economics, University of Missouri,
Columbia, 1970
M.A., Economics, University of Missouri,
Columbia, 1965
B.A., Hendrix College, Conway, 1963
kyj
PROFESSIONAL
ASSOCIATIONS: National Association of Regulatory Utility
Commissioners (Executive Committee,
Committee on National Energy Act)
Midwest Association of Regulatory Commissions
(Executive Committee)
American Economic Associations
American Agriculture Econoiaic Association
I `
P
yr
~r.
F
~ra
Nei
. ~ Slr t
I
~ F N~q
PUBLICATIONS:
BOOKS: Public Authorities and Development in Melbourne.
Austra ian Nat onal Unive- rsity Press► 1973
ARTICLES: "System Analysis and Long Run Marginal Cost
Electric Rates", 1980, Rate Symposium On
Problems of Regulated IndustYes. Forthcoming.
"Forecasting Arkansas General Revenues:, Business
and Economic Review, ~Iniversity of Arkansas,
Spring, 1980.
"APB Opinion No. 2, Addendum", Proceedings, Edison
Electric Institute Financial Conference, 1979.
i
"Measuring Corporate Performance", Proceeding SA
Third Annual Conference of the Accounting and
Finance Division of the Southeastern Electric
Exchange# 1979.
"The Structure of the Interdependence of Federal
and State Ratemaking", Third Annual Public
Utilities Conference, University of Texas at
Dallas, 1978.
I "A Regulator's View on Rate Structures% Rural
IIII Electrification Administration Retail Rates
Seminar, 1978.
' "Identifying the Seasonal Period of Electric
Energy Consumption", with Leigh Riddick,
Proceedings, First Annual Regulatory
Information Conference, National Regulatory
Research Institute, 1978.
a,
"Energy Policy Formation Using Classical and Box-
Jenkins Models", to be included in a text to be
published in 1980.
"Minimizing the Cost of Electric Power Using the
~a Tools of Interconnection, Wheeling and
Pooling", Economic Regulatory Administration,
U.S. Department of Energy, November, 1978.
"Identification of the Seasonal Pattern of
Electric Energy Consumption", Proceedings,
First Biannual Conference, National Regulatory
Research Institute, 1978.
"National Electric Rate Design Poiicies", U.S.
'i Senate on Energy, Conservation and R3gulation
of the Committee on Energy and National
x. Resources, September, 1977.
1 {
I
i
"Cogeneration", Inside Arkansas, Sept/Oct 1977.
"The Economics of Emergency Rate Hearings",
Proceedings of Worksho on Electric Utility
Financial Pro Tems a~tentialSSol"utions, The
Mitre Corporat on, Wash ngt~on, Aprilf 1976.
Public Authorities and Development in Melbourne,
Austra an Nat onaUniversity Press, 1973.
"The Public Authorities", Finance for Investment
in Urban Development, Urban Research Unit o ANU
Canberra, 972,
"A PPB Analysis of the Department of Regulatory
Agencies", Program Evaluation Branch, Dept, of
Budget and Finance, State of Hawaii, 1969.
Numerous seminar papers presented at technical
conferences and University seminars.
CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY:
j
I National Electric Rate Design Policies. Testimony
on Part E of S. 1469 before the Subcommittee on
Energy Conservation and Regulation of the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, 95th
Congress, First Session, 1977.
National Electric Rate Design Policies. Testimony
on Part E of HR6831 before the Subcommittee on
Energy and Power of the House Committee on
Interstate and Foreign Commerce, 95th Congress,
L First Session, 1977.
Testimony on HR 9482 before the Subcommittee on
Livestock and Grains of the Committee on
Agriculture, 95th Congress, Second Session,
1978.
I fit;
s ,
M
i5
*iG
T
!.yY11Plf~ .
RESUME
FRED MORIARTY
CONSULTING Financial Management and Data Processing
EXPERIENCEt
o Directed economic, technical and regulatory
evaluation of local cable television operation for
the Columbia, MO Cable Television Commission
o Testified and directed field activities related to
cable television rates of two cable television
companies before the Alaska Public Utilities
Commission
o Directed a cost of service study and the
development of electric rates for the Columbia, MO
electric utility.
o Testified and directed the development of
testimony for electric, gas and telephone rate
cases before the Arkansas, Ohio and Pennsylvania
1 Public Service Commissions.
i
o Testified and directed the analysis of oil
j pipeline regulatory methodology, financing of the
Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) and the
appropriate return on investment for the TAPS
before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
o Directed the development of sower rates and
supportive cost systems for the surer utilities in
Anchorage, Alaska; Garland, Texas; Sheboyianr
Wisconsin; and Washington County, Orngon.
o Directed the development 'of a long range
E management systems software evaluation for the
a City of Columbia# NO.
E a~
F~ I
o Implemented accounting and public ' housing
management systems for Municipal Information
Systems, Inc. in St. Louis.
o Management of EDP audit function for local audit
clients of a Sig 8 accounting firm located in St.
:s Louis.
i` PREVIOUS Government Management and Corporate Finance
EXPERIENCES
o Managed the developpment and implementation of the
State of Illinois comprehensive statewide
accounting system.
f'~
71
o Managed a 180 employee bureau for Illinois
Department of Personnel including data processing,
accounting, general services and administration of
statewide personnel examinations.
o Directed major modification of an Illinois state
personnel/position information system.
o Directed implementation of a program budgeting and
accounting system for Illinois Department of
Personnel.
o Managed sections of Corporate Financial Evaluation
and Operational Audits for Motorola, Inc.
o Designed and implemented management systems for
Burroughs Corporation.
EDUCATIONs UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
MBA in International Business
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
BSBA in Finance
PROFESSIONAL: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
+ Missouri Society of Certified Public Accountants
~y
j
F
1
fit'
Tj`t
~y
a
i~
pry,
ws
I`
I
I
RESUME
RICHARD P. ANTHONY II
CONSULTING SENIOR CONSULANT, TOUCHE ROSS S COMPANY,
EXPERIENCE- ST. LOUIS, MO
Data Proc~ esaina and Financial Planning
o Long Range Data Processing Plan for a Municipal
Government (population 65,000; annual budget $40
million)
o Feasibility Analysis and Systems Specifications
for a Computer Assisted Dispatch and Police
Records system for a municipal police dopar'ment
(population 60,000)
o EDP Feasibility Study, Vendor Selection and System
Implementation Plan for financial management,
sales order processing, inventory control and
manufacturing control for a shoe manufacturer.
o Data Processing Reviews for a clothing manufac-
turer (sales $25 million) and a nursing home
holding company.
o Date Processing Audits of the data processing
controls, computer facilities management and
p` planning of four businesses.
Rate Design and Analysis
o Utility Cost of Service Study and Tariff Design
for a large municipally owned water and sewer
utility. {
f, PREVIOUS FINANCE DIRECTOR AND ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER#
{
EXPERIENCE- CLAYTON, MO
Ir"
o Managed the financial, purchasing, data processing
t: and t..- personnel functions.
o Prepared Annual Budget, Five Year Capital
A Improvement Plan and Financial Statements,
o Conducted feasibility study and systems specifi-
cations for computer based accounting and
financial information system.
o Conducted salary survey and implemented new
~r employee compensation plan.
w
M 1
17i1t~
o Conducted analysis of proposals and contract
specification for employee group health, dental
and life insurance plan.
UTILITIES COMPTROLLER, CITY OF COLUMBIA, MO
o Managed Customer Service and Central Cashiering
functions and financial operations of city's four
utilities with total annuG1 revanues of $20
million.
o Assistant on the systems design and implementation
of an on-line inquiry and auditing system for
customer accounts and for central cashiering
system.
o Assisted in costs of service study for electric
utility.
o Conducted water rate analysis and rate design for
wetter utility.
i
o ConducteL analysis of and developed procedures for
collecting fuel adjustment allowance in electric
utility.
o Conducted study of possible effects of time-of-day
rates on electric utility.
o Established a budget billing program for the
electric utility.
r'
o Established City's Risk Management Program.
t
MILITARY
EXPERIENCE: 1ST LT., U.S. AIR FORCE, HONORABLY DISCHARGED, 1973
1 j
o Administrative Officer; Equal Opportunity Officer
EDUCATION: UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA
' M.S. in Public Administration, 1975
A.B. in American History/Political Science, 1970
PROFESSIONAL: American Association of Public Administration
Municipal Finance Officars Association
international City Management Association
International Personnel Management Association
V
i
f, Af
RESUME
LEIGH ANN RIDDICK
CONSULTING
EXPERIENCE: o Office of the Attorney General, State of Arkansas,
Division of Energy Conservation and Rate Advocacy
- Rate design, witness, time of use rates, for
major electric utility.
Office of the Attorney General, State of Utah,
Committee of Consumer. Services - Cost of service
witness, marginal cost of service study for major
gas utility.
PREVIOUS Rate Analyst IV, Wisconsin Public Service
EXPERIENCE: Commm~ss~on
o Full performance level professional public utility
rate analysis work which required the performance
of highly complex and advanced cost of service
studies and economic analysis in the design of
rates for the largest formal public utilty rate
rroceedings. Responded to complex rate design
inquiries and complaints. Independently provided
speialized cost studies, economic studies,
engineering studies and cost related rates to
Commission. Assisted in direction of work and
training less experienced staff members.
Chief Rate Ana:jst, Arkansas Public Service
s Commission
:4..~s
o Initiated and supervised activities of Rates
Section personnel in investigative, research, and
rate case work. Coordinated Rates Section
activity with other Commission sections and
J agencies. Administered federal and state
. programs. Interviewed job applicants and trained
new employees. Provided technical assistance to
the Commission and represented them at public
meetings. Primary responsibility within
Commission for implementation of alternative
methodologies in costing and pricing. Testified
in major rate cases. Worked closely with Finance
and Research Section of Commission Staff on
independent research projects. Reviewed all
tariffs. Major contact with Commission Staff for
utility personnel.
Rate And iIi, Arkansas PSC
o Assisted Section Chief sith administration of
section an supervision of Rate Analysis is and
g~
Ils. Special. projects coordinator. Primary
responsibility for electric utilities. Reviewed
all submitted tariffs. Assessed and testified to
the appropriateness of cost of service studies and
rates submitted by utilities. Conducted
alternative studies and/or designed alternative
rates when necessary. Drafted subsequent Orders
and briefs. Assisted Finance and Research Section
of Commission staff 0.th various projects.
Research Analyst
o nAcquired and analyzed data on orthwestern Arkansas. Aided bin preparation of
testimony for presentation before State Banking
Committee.
o Analyzed U.S. Census data for migration study of
labor market. Assisted in computer analysis of
data acquired.
s.
EDUCATIONS UNVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
Currently enrolled in PhD. program in Economics
UNIVERSITY 017 ARKANSAS
MA in Economics
HENDRIX COLLEGE
BA in Business and Economics
PROFESSIONAL: Omicron Delta Epsilon (honorary Economics Society) {
e; NARUC Subcommission I
I d
r
a r 1
.r
i
ii
k
i
■
PROPOSAL TO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
FOR AN
ELECTRIC RATE STUDY
AND
PURPA COMPLIANCE MANUAL
BY
SAY.. MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH CONSUL'T'ANTS, INCs
r<< APRIL, 1980
~e
VOLUME TYIQ
PRICE PROPOSAL
r ,
S ,
s
x
n
1
I
MARC A Professional Consulting Group
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. 3408 Lindell Boulevard
John C. Pickett, Ph.D. St. Louis, Missouri 63103
Fred Moriarty, C.P.A. (314) 531.3370
Richard P. Anthony
April 21, 1990
Mr. R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Ntj'sonc
Management And Research Consultants, Inc. (MARC) proposes to
conduct an electric ra`'e study and develop a PURPA Compliance
Manual for the City of Denton. Dr. John C. Pickett, past
Chairman of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and a national
authority in electric rate design, will be the project manager if
MARC is selected to perform this engagement. Under Dr. Pickett's
leadership as Chairman of the Arkansas Commission, the Arkansas
Power and Light Company became one of the leading utilities in
the country in the areas of innovative rates and load management.
He has been very active in national energy legislation and
testified before Congress during their evaluation of PURPA.
MARC is a group of professional consultants offering
economic and financial services to state and local government.
We offer the City of Denton a project team with a unique
combination 3f experience in utility regulation, direct utility
management and several years of utility consulting. We employ
` only experienced professionals and thus avoid the turnover and
f on-the-jot; training problems common to larger diversified firms.
I will assist or. Pickett as Technical Advisor with the
' development of total revenue requirements, allocation of costs to
customer classes and preparation of the final report- My own
background includes six years of financial conoulting to
government owned utilities and utility regulatory agencies. I am
a Certified Public Accountant and have testified on utility
financial issues before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions
and several state public service commissions.
Richard Anthony and Leigh Rifdick will participate in the
ti cost of service and rate design activities. Mr. Anthony and Ms.
Riddick have extensive experience in direct government operation
1d
a'r
p'.
and regulation of electric utilities, Mr, Anthony was Utilities
Comptroller and Director of Finance for two Missouri cities prior
to joining the consulting profession. His responsibilities
included customer services, cost studies and fuel adjustment
clause,,. Ms. Riddick has several years experience as an economic
consultant and public service commission rate analyst in which
she has testified on numerous issues related to utility cost of
service and rate design.
MARC proposes a program approach that will be directed
toward identifying and implementing cost of service and rate
design principles that will assure that the City of Denton will
ultimately achieve the goals set out in PURPA. The strategic
objectives of increased efficiency, conservation and equity will
form the basic rate design principles toward which the entire
engagement will be directed. At your request, we have presented
the Technical
our
Volume I andl Volume w 1I parts.
contains the Price contains Proposal.
Proposal
we hope the enclosed proposal adequately describes our
purpose, approach and qualifications and that you will select
MARC to perform t* 's important engagement. Please call Dr.
Pickett at (501) 327-3982 or a at (314) 531-3370 if you have any
questions regarding cur firm or this proposal.
Very truly yours,
:.ti ~ CJtt~L~
z Fred Moriarty
FJ141 sw
O"
1~?
;j
k38
1
I
PROPOSAL TO
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
it
I
i
FOR AN
ELECTRIC RATE STUDY
AND
PURPA COMPLIANCE MANUAL
4
BY
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INCA
APRIL, 1980
VOLUME TWO
PRICE PROPOSAL
i
I
F, T.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
?AGE
VOLUME ONE
Introduction 2
Approach 4
Financial Analysis 4
Cost of Service 6
Rate Design 10
PURPA Compliance Manual 14
Qualifications, References and Resumes 11
VOLUME TWO
Price Proposal 2
f fit':
v
5,~4
x71 ( .
4
i
l
1 I
t
PRICE PROPOSAL
MARC's rate structure is simple. The Project Manager and
technical advisory time is billed to the client at $50 per hour
for actual hours worked. Additional project consultants are
billed at $40 per hour. Out of pocket travel and other expenses
incurred during the project will be billed at cost. Our practice
is to bill our clients monthly for time and expenses incurred
during the preceeding month.
The following work plans list the major activities proposed
during the rate study and the development of the PURPA Compliance
Manual. Estimated hours by category of personnel, estimated
completion date for each activity and maximum 'not to exceed"
costs are provided separately for the PURPA Compliance'Manual
portion of the work. Our proposed approach and time table
recognizes the inherent relationship between the required rate
study and the mandates of PURPA. We anticipate that the
preparation of the Compliance Manual will primarily require a
review, summarization and presentation of the information
obtained during the rate study but modified to address the
j specific mandates of PURPA. Since Or. Pickett is the proposed
Project Manager and is intimately familiar with the PURPA
requirements, he will personally develop most of the Compliance
Manual, The bid price for the development of the PURPA
Compliance Manual, therefore, assumes that MARC will also perform
the Rate Study according to the proposed work plan. Both
workplans assume a May 15, 1980 start date as specified in the
Request for Proposal.
s' The Price Proposal includes the time required to review the
findings of the cost of service study and initial PURPA reviews
s with the Public Utility Board. If these reviews are to be in the
} form of a public hearing, they should be preceded by a public
announcement of the specific rate design initiatives developed
during the design of basic electric rates. We have, therefore,
scheduled the preliminary public hearing to coincide with the
completion of the customer cost of service study and design of
the basic rates. We have nol included any time for public
hearings or expert testimony to present or respond to the final
x report because of the uncertainty regarding the scope or timing
of those activities at this time. We will be available to
E provide those additional services, however, for the rest of 1980
at the same hourly rates plus out-of-pocket expenses.
;a
f?
2
TT
R~
pp{ C
CITY OF CENPON
PROPOSED WORK PLAN
RATE SN?Y
IOTIMATED HOURS ESTIMATED
PROJELT TECHNICAL PROJECT COKILETION
ACTIVITY MANAGER ADVISOR CONSULTANTS DATE
Review Staff Cost Projections 16 16 40 5/30/80
Collect Class Load Data 24 64 6/13/80
Prepare Revenue Requirements 16 24 40 6/27/80
{ Perform Class wst Study 16 32 120 7/15/80
Design Banio Electric Rates 40 16 40 7/25/80
] s 7.aview Energ1 Charge Adjustment 16 24 8/08/80
Develop Inrmative Rats Proposals 24 8/08/80
Develop Time-of-Day Rates 40 40 8/22/60
~r
Prepare Final Report 24 40 40 9/15/80
Total Hours 216 128 408
HWrly Rite 50 50 S 40
$10,800 $6,400 $16,320
Total Time Charges $33,520
Estimated Expenses 51000
Maximum Charges $38,520
~p
+ I
3
t
.IWI
f"
May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Awarding Bids for Wastewater Treatment Plant.
SUMMARY:
i Bids were received and oraned for the Wastewater Treatment
Plant on April 22, 1980. There were eight bids received as
follows:
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
Gracon Construction Company s
Mesquite, Tx $7,607,800
Carrothers Construction Company
Paola, Kansas $7,860,000 j
Sanders-Midwest
Kansas Cit%-, Missouri $7,897,558
Permian Construction, Inc.
'at Katy, Texas $8,096,200
Belco Construction Company
r Temple, Texas $8,196,050
Seven-K Corporation
X Mesquite, Texas $$1295,707
S.E. Wright 6 Company
Texarkana, Texas $8,6000000
Chisholm Trail Construction Co., Inc.
Port Worth, Texas
S8,8570925
The City received a very good response on these bids. Over t
one-hundred fourteen (114) contractors, sub-contractors, and
suppliers were present at the bid opening for this project and
associated sewer interceptor and collection line work. i
if final approval of contract award progresses recording to
schedule, construction will begin by July 1, 1980s and with j
completion date planned for December 1981
` i
f
i
F'lti tv
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Cities Cost
Grant Budget $808430000.0V*
(includes Plant t; Interceptor)
Apparent Low Bids fora
Wastewater Treatment $7,607,800.00 $10901,950.00
Interceptor a Collection
Linas $lr125,115.56 $ 286,383.89
TOTAL FOR CONST. BID $8,732,915.56 $2,128,333.89
Below Grant Budget by $ 110,084.44
*For Constructlon contracts only, inspection, additional
Engineering, contingencies 6 training anticipated to be an
additional $1,1930460.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Recommendation to award contract to lowest and best bidder.
Recommendation will then be forwarded to Texas Department of
Water Resources for tentative approval and then to
Environmental Protection Agency for final approval. It is
anticipated that TDWR and EPA approval will take 30 days.
t
ALTERNATIVESt
1. Award contract to low bidder, Gracon Construction
Company.
2. Award Contract to any other alternative bidder.
This would require substantial explanation to the Texas
Department of Water Resources and the Environmental
Protection Agency.
RECOMMENDATIONt
The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of April 30, 1980,
recommended award of the bid to Gracon Construction Company
F of Mesquite, Texas, for the amount of $7,607,800.
Respectfully,
~g R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
ku^p
EXHIBIT I Letter Freese & Nichols
II Bid Tabulation
I
*m«ae
EXHIBIT I
LIMOS W IR[[L[,►[.
JAM[. R. NKMpLi, ►C. '
RW'"; L. NIC MOIf, ►.L
fREI SE AND 1'!CIlOLS, INC. Aodt [[,[►L
JO[ RAUI JCN[f. ►
ROO[RT A. TNO M►fON II
C O N U L T I N G i N S /
S G l N f R S
JOE 0. MAPES. P.61.
April 23, 1980 vNC COPILA "pr►.i~
r.NN H. COOK PX
T. ANTHONY Iwo, ►.L
GARY N. RF[Vff,►.L
Mr. Robert E. Nelson, P.E.
Director of Utilities
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: Sewerage System Improvements
Project C-48-1188
Contract Award Recommendations
Dear Bob:
Bids were received in your City Hall on April 22, 1980 for construction
of an expansion to your Wastewater Treatment Plant and for construction
of Interceptor/Collector sewer lines. These projects are the Step 3
I Construction Phase of your Public Law 92-500 Federal Grant Sewer Improve-
meet Project which was initiated in 1975. Eight (8) bids were received
for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion contract and seventeen (17)
bids were received for the Interceptor/Sewer contract. A Tabulation of rojects rrecommendationsoforaaward othe the projects areaasefollows;anaiyses and
I. Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion:
Bids ranged from a low of $7,607,800 to a high bid of 58.8579925.
The tow bidder, Gracon Construction Co., has two projects
under construction at the present time for which we are Con-
sulting Engineers. Both are smaller than your proposed WWTP
expansions although one of.them is a new wastewater treatment
plant. The quality of their work, !nd their cooperation
during construction of these projects, has been excellent.
They also are nearing rompletioh considerably ahead of their
contract schedule. They have completed other much larger
wastewater treatment plant projects for the Cities of Dallas
and Tyler, Texas. We have contacted City personnel who adminis-
trated these projects during their construction and received
at, unqualified "excellent" recommendation for the Gracon firm.
We therefore recommend that their low bid be accepted.
TLLLIIIHONL St? 71e-7161 ell LAMAR SYR[ST FORT WOA TH. T[RAA 7e 10A
I
"fiJLgi
t1r. Robert E. Nelson, P.E.
April 23, 1930
Page Two
2. Interceptor/Collector Sewers:
This protect consists of a new Interceptor Sewer from the
Pecan Creek WWTP upstream to Elm Street, and the construction
of a collector sewer system for the Audra Lane subdivision.
Bids received ranged from the low bid of $19125,435.56 submit-
ted by Eagle Ford Construction Co. to a high bid of $2,084,505.00.
The low bidder, Eagle Ford Construction Co., is a firm which
has constructed many protects in the last 25 years in Denton
under the firm name of Elm Fork Construction Co. They con-
structed both phases of the existing Wastewater Treatment
Plant, one expansion at the Water Treatment Plant, the orig-
inal 27" Raw Water Line, and the State School Sewer Outfall,
among others. They are a competent firm and we recommend
that the Interceptor Sewer contract be awarded to Eagle Ford
Construction Co.
In summary, our recommendations for award of the two contracts are as
follows:
CONTRACT
PROJECT CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
Wastewater Treatment
' Plant Expansion Gracon Constr. Co. 519607,800.00
Interceptor Sewers Eagle Ford Constr. Co. $19125.435.56
Total Contract Amount $81733,235.56
The total amount included in your Step 3 Grant offer fer this protect, j
{ for construction, is $8,843,000. Both low bidders have advised us that
V their bids include provisions for subcontracting to Minority Business
Enterprise Firms in the rtnge of 14-18% of the contract amount, as de-
sired by EPA. Both are preparing the necessary documentation to subsian-
tiate these IiBE subcontracts and will submit it to us within the next
No weeks. E
Li
It is our recommendation that the City of Denton award the two contracts
as out'iined above, subject to subsequent approval by the Texas Department
of Water Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency. Please tall
If you have any questions concerning these recommendations.
k
Respectfully submitted,
FREEZE ANG NICHOLS,• INC.
Robert L. Nichols, P.E.
RLN:ks
J
E)ailBIT II
BID TABU01`104
DENTON, TEXAS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION
PROJECT C-48-1188
•
Bids Received: 2:00 P.M., April 22, 1980 FREESE 8 NICHOLS, INC.
Consulting Engineers
CONTRACTOR TOTAL AMOUNT BID REMARKS
Gracon Construction Cc.
3201 Hwy. 67 - Suite F
Mesquitra, Texas 75150 51,6071800.00 5% Bid Bond
Carrothers Constr. Co.
P. 0. Box 269
Paolo, Kansas 66071 11860,000.00 5% Bid Bond
Sanders/Midwest, Inc.
P. 0. Box 6967
Kansas City, MO 64130 7,897,558.00 5% Bid Bond
Permian Constructors, Inc.,
P. 0. Box 8
j Katy, Texas 77450 8,096,200.00 5% Bid 3ond
Belco Construction Co., Inc,
P. 0. Box 1288
S Temple, Texas 76501 8,194,790.00 5% Bid Bond {
A";
Seven K Corporation
EY,
P. 0. Box 6126
Texarkana, Texas 75501 8,295,707.00 5% Bid Bond
H. E. Wright 6 Co., Inc.
P. 0. Box 5x23
Texarkana, Texas 75501 896OO,000.00 5% Bid Bon(: j
Chisholm Trail Constr. CO., Inc,
P. 0. Box 18337
Fort Worth, Texas 76118 81857,925.00 S% Bid Bond
Yi CERTIFIED CORREC', BY:
`Y e~ L.
r v n ope an , .E.
a
May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGRNDA ITEM
SUBJECTS
Awarding Hide for Pecan Creek Outfall Line and Audra. Lane
Collection Lines.
SUMMARYs
' Bids were received ind opened for the Pecan Creek outfall
line and the Audra Line collection lines on April 22, 1980.
There were seventeen i'.7) bids received as followss
BIDDER TOTAL
-k
$1,125,435.56
Eagle Ford Cons. Co.
' Dallas, Tx
Paul A. Bosco $1,217,933.50
Lightning Const. Co. $1,2190453.25
Seagoville,Tx $1,225,885.51
Hall Const, Co.
Grapevine,Tx
L.D ..onaster $1,274,448.90
Ft, Worth,Tx
Crookham & Vessels $1,308,234.55
Sherman,Tx.
Ben Sira & Co. $1,325,490,55
Dallas, Tx
St. Laruk Cor $1,367,078.20
pp.
Southfield, Mo. $1,384,686.83
J.L, Bertram Const. Co.
Ft. Worth,Tx
Texas Sterling Const. Co. $1,3890062.00
Euless, Tx
E. L Dalton Co. $1,42E'.,536,60
Dallas, 1'x
Garney Companies, Inc. $1,426,228.00
Kansas City, Mo. $1~59q~345.00
Oscar Renda Contracting, Inc.
Roanoke, Tx,
P&H Utility Const. & $1,737,605.00
John H.K. Const. Co.
Tyler, Tx. $1,854,613.30
C&W Utility Conttacting Co.
Desoto, Tx. $1,854,017.E0
Cullum Construction Co.
Dallas, Tx
Associated Contractors, Inc. $2,084,545.00
Jackson, Miss.
I
I
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Estimated Cost Bid
Per Grant App ication
Pecan Creek
Outflow Line $11181,347 $ 874,906.55
Audra Lane
Coll. Lines $ 342,248 $ 243,829.01
Total $1,523,595. s 700.00*
5,125, 5.56
~l Grant Funds $ 8390051.67
f City of Denton
ffff Bond Funds 286,383.89
TOTAL COST $1,125,435.56
*Grant Ineligible
ACTION REQUIRED:
Recommendation to award contract to lowest and beat bidder.
Recommendation will ther, be forwarded to the Texas Dept,, of
Water Resources for final approval. It is anticipated that
TDWR and EPA approval will take 30 days.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Award bid to low bidder, Eagle Ford Const. Company
2. Award bid to any other alternative bidder. This would
require substantial explanation to TDWR & EPA.
RECOMMENDATIONt
The Public Utility 3oard, at their meeting of April 30, 19800
recommended awar3 of the bid to Eagle Ford Construction
Company of Dallas, Texas, for the amount of $1,125,435,56,
Respectfully,
R,E, N@Ison
EXHIBIT I Letter from Freese $ Nichols Director of Utilities
11 Bid Tabulation
i.
waft l
E)EIBIT I fs
SMON W. TRCC{/, ►L
JAM[{ R. NI'HU ►.C.
RO/CRT - NIC 6, GL
tit ft.IRSt{ ►t.
JOt►AULJONt{.i
O L
FR££S£ AND N1 CMS, INC. RO/tRT` L
RO/CRT A. THOMPSON III, P,{. ,
C 0 N J U L 7 1 N 0 I N O I N I i II 1 Jo[ L MA►C{, ►,C.
oat G ALLCN, P C,
r April 23, 1980 W INr- C ``LAND,'. L
NN GOON, ► L
T.
T. ANIH R{10,
Ile
OARV N. R[CVt{, R.C.
.C
Mr. Robert E. Nelson, P.E.
Director of Utilities
City of Denton
Municipal Building
De,iton, Texas 76201
Re: Sewerage System Improvements
Project C-48-1188
Contract Award Recommendations
Dear Bob:
Bids were received in your City Nall on April 22, 1980 for construction
of an expansion to your Wastewater Treatment Plant and for construction
of Interceptor/Collector sewer lines. These projects are the Step 3.
Construction Phase of your Public Law 92-500 Federal Grant Sewer Improve-
ment Project which was initiated in 197'. Eight (8) bids were received
for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion contract and seventeen (17)
bids were received for the Interceptor/Sewer contract. A Tabulation of
Bids received for each of the projects is attached. Our analyses and
recommendations for award of the projects are as follows:
r
1. Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion:
t
Bids ranged from a low of $7,601,800 to a high bid of $8,857,928. i
The low bidder, Gracon Construction Co., has two projects i
under construction at the present time for which we are Con- I
sulting Engineers. Both are smaller than your proposed WWTP ;
i expansion, although one of them is a new wastewater treatment
plant, The quality of their work, and their cooperation
Y during construction of these %rojects, has been excellent,
They also are nearing completion considerably ahead of their
contract schedule. They have completed other much larger
wastewater treatment plant projects for the Cities of Dallas
and Tyler, Texas, lie have contacted City personnel who adminis-
trated these projects during their construction and received
an unqualified "excellent" recommendation for the Gracon firm.
We therefore recommend that their low bid be accepted.
f
y
TtLtPHON9 117 3 34•7tO1 111 LAMAR /TRttT ►ORT WORTH, Tt%AI 71101
{
Robert E. Nelson, P.E.
April 23, 1980
Page Two
2. Interceptor~ollector Sewers:
This project consists of a new Interceptor Sewer from the
Pecan Creek WWTP upitream to Elm Street, and the construction
of a collector sewer system for the Audra Lane subdivision.
ted received bid
submit-
to a fhighlbid4of $2,084x505.00.
The low bidder, Eagle Ford Construction Co., is a firm which
has constructed many projects in the last 25 years in Denton
under the firm name of Elm Fork Construction Co. They con-
structed both phases of the existing Wastewater Treatment
Plant, one expansion at the Water Treatment Plant, the orig-
inal 27" Raw Water Line, and the State School. Sewer Outfall,
among others. They are a competent firm and we recommend
that the Interceptor Sewer contract be awarded to Eagle Ford
Construction Co.
In summary, our recommendations for award of the two contracts are as
follows:
i
CONTRACT
i PROJECT CONTRACTOR AMOUNT
Wastewater Treatment
Plant Expansion Gracon Constr. Co. $79607,800.00
Interceptor Sewers Eagle Ford Constr. Co. $19125.435.56
Total Contract Amount $8,133,235.56
The total amount included in your Step 3 Grant offer for this project,
for construction, is $8,843,000. Both low bidders have advised us that
their bids include 1Novisions for subcontracting to Minority Business
g Enterprise Firms in the range of 14-18% of the contract amount, as de-
sired by EPA. Both are preparing the necessary documentation to substan-
tiate these 148E subcontracts and will submit it to us within the next
two weeks.
It is our recommendation that the City of Denton award the two contracts
as outlined above, subject to subsequent approval by the Texas Department
of Water Resources and the Environmental Protection Agency. Please call
4' if you have any questions concerning these recommendations.
k i
Respectfully submitted, I
i
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
s ~~e►YdrP
Robert L. Nichols, P.E.
RLN:ks
~Ulll ~_e blU TuTALS
INTERCI~TZI' ~E4lEfi5- bfT0 E%AS
PROJECT: C-48-1188
SECTION A SECTION B-1 SECTION B-2 AUD
LANE AUDR CONTRACTOR OPECAN UTFALLRLINE (EL GIBLE) (NONAELIGIBLE) TORTAL
1. EAGLE FORD CONST. CO., INC. 5 874,906,55 $243,829.01 $ 6,700.00 $1,125,435.56
2. PAUL A, BOSCO b SONS CONTR. CORP. 876,461,25 334,047.50 5,750.00 11216,264,75
3. LIGHTING CONSTR. CO., 111C, 956,360.00 255,641.25 !,450.00 1,219,451.25
4. HALL CONSTR. CO. 9296210.89 287,374.62 99300,00 1,226,B85.51
5. L. D. CONATSER 11004,954.55 259,894.35 91600.00 16274,448.90
6. CROOKEII d VESSELS, INC. 970,205.01 323,179.04 14,850.50 1,3081234.55
/-1 7.. BFN SIRA A CO. 984,332.00 333,850.65 79300.00 1,325,490.65
1
8, 5TOLARUK CORP. 9619417.00 383,161.75 24,000.00 1368578.76
9. J. L. BERTRAM CONSTR. CO. 11074,217.53 299,993.14 10,541.00 1,3849751.67 ;
10. TEXAS STERLING CONSTR. CO. 11175,658.00 201,554.00 119850.00 1,389,062.00
11. E. L. DALTON A CO. 1,092,680,20 319,891.40 12,965.00 1,4259536.6D 1
E
12. GARNEY COMPANIES, INC, 1,054,712.00 3256016.00 46,500.00 1,426,228,00
13. OSCAR RENDA CONTRACTING, INC. 19231,798,00 351,307.00 7,100.00 1,590,205,00 E
14, P A H UTILITY CONST. CO. 1,334,198.00 3759421,00 14,000.00 1,723,619,00
15. C & N UTILITY CONTRACTING CO. 1,402,647,00 4.49,866,30 15,000.00 1,854,013,30
i 16. CULLUM CONSTR. CO. 1,447,215.00 396,002.60 10,800.00 11854,017,60
f ~17. ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTORS, INC. 7,5776838.00 491,907.00 14,800.00 21084,545.00 j
ti
CERT FIED CORRECT BY: BIDS RECEIVED: 2:00 P,M., A^RIL 22, 1980
G . FREESE AND NICHOLS,INC. !
. E s P E0 ' CONSULTING ENGINEERS : .
i
I r
I
I
i
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE ()F MEETINGS May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA):
Consider payment to Golden Triangle Industrial Park for Overdepth paving
on Morse Street.
SUMMARY:
When the Golden Triangle Industrial Park was being developed, the City
agreed to pay for V of extra paving depth on Morse Street. Apparently
the payment was never made when the street was completed.
I
l I
w FISCAL S}JMMARY:
Cost to the City Is $4,505.70. Funds are available in the Street Department
Budget.
ACTION REG}ITRED:
Council should approve for overdepth paving, tl
i
f
ALTERNATIVES: j
Not make the payment.
I
STAFF R%O[KENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of payment. d
Exlli9iTS:
1 .
F
i~
I ,
k
CITY OF DENTON
h
MEMORANDUM
10: G. Chris Hartung
r
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: April 25, 1980
:
RE: Payment for Overdepth on Morse Street
In April 1919, paving was complete on Morse Street. When the first 1
addition to the Golden Triangle Industrial Park was plated the staff
recommended to Planning and Zoning that the developer be resproosible ;
for extra width to the street. Since the Industrial Park is oriented
toward wholesaling operations, regional offices, etc., we U dicated to
the developer that the City would participate in the overdepth. This
was before our new bid procedures went into effect and therefore partict-
pation was approved by Mr. Owens. Through an error made by our 1ngineering
Staff, payment was never made to Mr. Frank Martino developer of the Golden
,r Triangle Mall.
f' We recommend that 1 inch of asphalt be paid for over the entire surface.
This amounts to $1.15 per square yard for 3,918 yards. The cost to the
City would be $4,505.10.
1
We have included a copy of Mr. Martino's contract with Jagoe Public and 1
{'R also a copy of the City's acceptance of the strP^t.
h.
1
r t~ r '
Ave a
Attachment
Al
1 f
V
t
I '
h
I
~Y
N. F.+.'uA4FN'4Y04M~~r~+fiY{G Y
h✓A~ .
r
1 ` S
14
BID FORM
ii~ r L..l
Date
Ih Mr. Frank Martino
.,p Ruasell•Noanaan Mfg. Co. y Inc.
P.p. Box 2306
Donlon, Tome 76201
BASK DIOP For the construotion of a now 45 ft. wide asphaltic pavoment road on
Loop 2 , De don, Tc e, for tho sum of
A 'c
ALTERTIl BI Di For tho substitution of all concroto pavomont road in liou of
~r•, asphaltic pSVanont
}
i Add/Doduotp" C-
a UNIT PRICES
c Fill dirt, per cubic yard r3, 7S~~o~G.._~•
Limo stabilltation, per aq. yard I.So r..Q,44.
24" standard 01ty curb and gutter, per 1.f. `3-Y6- ~ftAr•
Conorotd flstwork in approachoa, per s.t.
R.OfP. pips, per l.f.
Iieadutllsj each ,1
r. I
Asphalt paving, 41" Typo AI 1I" Type D. Par s Y~~_.~.. d(~Q•1 _
Bill Che V-Pres.
Respectfully oubmittod
Business Addreao„ P e~ O -
7G7 n l _
Time of Ccaplotion In calendar days 9{~~ .,~_a%~~s ,F mfr ,
lit
J -77~
Jagoe-Public Company r" we s
P. 0. „ Box 250 r wti.
Denton Texas 76201;
. x
^R, , YY 1 1
Incorporated in th® State of
4' i 7 Y Yf rr
W1 k;
l y
I '
rnlMso Illy
14to I,
~XCAvt'f10
r~
ILI
3aP~ CL ~pP
f
7 24 id, r- CO-6, V 11J.
f'-/ jr ePG P a o ors I
4491 . g L not 143
39~P slY Paw; iG ~.9I L7~j¢z j
I I
P
5,. VP~.Y k i
Y
10
t' I 44"
I ~
I i F I
14
f
. ~ ...E ~ i _ . ~ .
3 ! I ~ it !I
1J I I ~ it i
k . i
i
I s~ ! I I I V I, ' i j! I 1
I
F
i
I
I
IAIN7itl IN UAA
ht`a o ylp unl 5006 IV00.Y; 1 06 rPHN; 1106 WHIII
~w11EYlt`Ii7l-f~Y+d'14Y;at:a`~• r.a«K...~...~ .
7'1
I
9
C1TYofDENT0JV rExA.S MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)382.9601
April 19, 1979
Mr. Bill Cheek
Jagoe-Public Company
P. 0. Box 250
Denton, Texas 76201
t
Dear Bill,
Wo have received your maintenance bond on the Mrse Street
w,
Construction - Section I. Your work has been inspected and
pavement depths were checked by coring tests. The City of
Denton hereby accepts these street improvements Ind your
maintenance bond, The effective expiration date of the main-
tonance bond will be March 22, 1980.
Sincerely,
ll Wm. Mack Parker, P.E.
City Engineer
41p: av
I
j
a DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
, ~{u++.na.RYRWw'lp rre.Li~iY rNw Mer.nfw. r......... n.,.
1
E
k mINITY ENGINEERING TESTING C013FORATION
IIII Ina , TEXAS
Tr.rc o~ f~1t/
DATE 3/2/79
TO: City Of Denton REPORT NO. D-25863
Engineering Departm`nt
Civic Censer FILE NO.
Denton, Texas 76201
PROJECT: Morse Street - City Denton .
REPORT OFr Coring of Asphalt Pavement for Determination of
/ Thickness of Asphalt,
i
RESULTS:
ocation ILM•A•C; H.H.A.C. Thickneas Z
a, Sts: 1+00 Type: Q 1'3/411
1+00 A. 5 1/411
2+00 D 1 3/4" 1
2+00 A 4 3/4" i I
}k 3+00 D 1 3/4n 1
3+00 A 5 1/4" f
s 4+00 D 1 1/2" I
} 4+00 A 4 1/211 ;
JJ
40
` / 1 h
f
!
COPIES TO.
3- ALave k
I
TRINITY ENGINEERING TESTING CORPORATION
Jack S, Haeton,,P.Et, Manager
r61 ra.lh rAe.• et iAt1 repirl err for Ue aelydrl at 6' IAI eCIM la Me, .w ebtt'nId Ld apple 6n11 Is 1%1 uM►fN raid 1111N le•
...r.,r t.......-r Gr.. R.d fn Am I.dk.l,Yt of Ib t.dh:u DI ~rpDHenll, IdtnUttl Lred.411 The rn ~I Wr~I T~,@yll iStJ~lf. p.f ♦MfM ..r:K A►afMMJlI...
,'.9.h+eCWeWG?"p1F.t.p~'FS.:.ryry+'.W A^+w°"M
May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM /
SUBJECTi
` Acceptance of the EPA Step II G--ant Agreement/Amendment for
Engineering Services for New Interceptor Sewer Lines.
SUMMARYi
The City of Denton has had application for EPA assistance
pending for several years ror engineering work for a9veral
interceptor sewers, Hickory Creek line being the major line.
EPA has extended a grant offer in the amount of $113,672 or
s 75% participation for the $151,563 engineering project.
F Engineering work will be scheduled to begin as soon as
possible after final award of the grant with compl9tion of
plans and specifications scheduled in one year. After
completion of the engineering and approva' by the Texas
Depa►tment of Water Resources and EPA, bids for construction
would be received and construction could possibly begin by
January 1982. Construction is antieipat40 to take 12 to 18
months.
The major line is the Hickory Creek interceptor running from
US 380 to just south of Old Alton with a lift station located
at the southernmost point, Lines are also planned in the
Cooper Creek and Pecan Creek watershed area,
FISCAL S11MMARYt
f TOTAL COST OF ENGINEERING WORK $151,563 r
GRANT FUNDS $113,672
BOND FUNDS $ 37,891
71
ACTION REQUJAEDt
Acceptance of the EPA Step II Grant.
ALTERNATIVESt
1. Accept Grant.
2. Reject Grant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONt
r The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of 4/30/80,
recommended acceptance of the EPA Step It Grant.
Respectfully,
t 9< R.N. a son 4
Director of Utilities
s
I
EXHIBITS I Grant Agreement/Amendment (4 pages)
12 List of Proposed Construction Items.
E
I
{
i
i
I
k
I
rea
r:a+tirpy
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AOENCT tRANT IDENTIFICATION NO.
i .
GRANT AGREEMENT/AMENDMENT
_ C-481188-12-0
CNECR APPLICAELE ITCMISI AT[ OF A'RARO (OA111PIIPe d414)
M T 4-17-80
` GRANT AN 1N 0M[Nt TY PC OF ACTION
/ [NT RfLAt(D PROIdCt(N97J Continuation
PART I-CENINAL INFORMATION
I, GRANT PROGRAM Const, Grants i. STATUTE P[f ERENC[ L REGULATION R[f[RENC[
Subpart E
1. GRANTEE ORCANIZATION
t. N1M( C. A00RCIS
City of Denton 215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
` 7L (MPLOVtR I.O. No. (EI.V)
-
r 1, PROJ[CT MANAGER f0rvo" 4'mll,irtl
f. NAM( It A00RNS
r E. Nelson City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Director of Utilities Denton, Texas 76201
C. TLLEPNON( NO. 06,1,4. Are. 000
PPOJCCT Off ICCR 410A Gmini1)
d A0UR 011
L "AMC
John R. Lock. ?,Eq Texas Department of Water Resources
a TITL[ Construction Grants and Water
Quality Planning Divisi.n
C.T(LLPNON.No finrhdrAIN$rokJ P.0, Box 13087, Capitol Station
512/475-0380 Austin Texas 78711
aI
PROJECT TITLE AID 0[SCRIRTOM
Segment 2 of a Step 2 project for preparation of construction drawings and
specifications for constructing new interceptor sewer lines.
fk PROJ [Cf fT[P fN'IITJ -
I 'r
. 2
le
k nuRAnnN
OAOJKCT P941001DAre0 l'IOOL 1 nClnOn(II.A. r1
r 1980 to June 1981 ALril 1980'to June 1981
DOLLAR AM064T1
$151,563.00 U $113.672,00
tOtAL PROJ[<T COITI A 7R AN/ uAOUN 1 (!n•KLrMAroI, )W" P1 I, NntU I L104 ♦N. MAL, ffJIA 1'InAd.1
tetAL nl(ntE [eIrllRwrJ s1
TWA AC ti01J fTNlr .JrU[ull.el MneurHJ
W AL EUOf[T ►LR,OO t01 TS
u 11
ACCOUNTING AtA
APOROPR AV04 Dtlt CON?ROL NO, ACCOWIt N01 OEJ CLASS AMOV4T CNARO1[0 l
11.
O 68X0103.9 E00169 807HQu5005 " 11 $113,672.00
Ii .
11. PAYMENT MItN00 11, PAVt[ f1VAM@ MId M4111nd flhNPre. bIC)Ude 21P CPU )
AtlVANCl1 I,,,,,--t H (+Pt fl R[~IN tullll'~LNT City of Denton
etN a 215 East McKinney
, Denton, Texas 76201
t[NO PATM[Nt RCOUILIT r „Emarv-GA LOnO
!3 IPA FIIIA 1100-10A IRer, 1.111 R[PLACd EPA fOPM S700.304141V. 4•731 NNICN IS PACE t OF 4
77 041OLVIC AND [PA 0004 1100.11,
71
R:A';MTa~
GRANT IOYNTIPICATION NO. _ C-481168-12-0
PART 11-APPROVED BUDGET
TABLE A.OBJECT CLASS CATLGORY
TOTAL APP ROV [0 4LLOR ABLE
f,1'om. cur, lrvcfl w 1)
RERyaNNEL NIA _ EUDGET PUIIOO COST
1 RRINa( ■(N(Rltf
' 7. TRAVEL
1 COVIPMENr
f wPRLItf - _
CONTRACTUAL
' L CONIT RV C710N
I 1. OTM(R
I
TOTAL DIAICT CNARYIf
10. INDIRECT cOSr$! RATL BAIL
'I- TOTAL lshu•I ~rJRI!• /.final _ `'I
t TOTAL APPROVED GRANT AMOUNT S
TABLE B • PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSI PICA TION
iNu1FCW4fnRHOII) N/A
L
I 0
I~ f
k r,
E 1.
10. TOTAL 11rln1 Cr•nu• 7. /rdlrut ,
11, TOTAL APPROVED GRANT AMOUNT S
TABLE C • PAOO RAN ELEMENT CLASSI rIC AT10N
(Con •7rVC Ilon7 '
y I. AOMINIITRATION lAPLNfE 1~
.00
t. PAENMIN ARY [ARLNI[ 1,400
'
1LAND {TRUC TU R[1, AIaMT•a P.WAY
p
►RCMIT[t TUAAL [NOINICRINO SAIIC REEL
i"
1. OTM[R AR CNITttTURAI CNOINIlRINO •[t1
{ 1. PROJECT INSPECTION Ptgo
r, LAND OCYELOPf I[NT
I. RELOCATION tRPENItl
!S t. tl[LOC ATION PArMEN T1 TO IN DI yIbVA41 ANO >tV {INt{It{
OLMOLITION ASO RtMOW L
11. CON1/AUt}ION ANO PRDJttT IMFAOVtMtNT
r' Its [aVIPMtNT
It. MILttLLANt OVL
Sail mkimis
14. TOTAL IL1nu 1 NuM 1T1~
It. t{rIMAt(D INtamc (11 f(uLW
If. N[T PA 01[tT ►MOUr1r (L IRS II mMu! 1)1
H, LI111 1N [LIaI[L[ IACLULIONI
A001 tONrlNaimclas
u. TOTALI[Nrn Ortnll♦_-ZS ►•d.r•I 7S r,1
Io,TOTAL APPROVED GRANT AMOUNT S
IA72 00
EPA PP1m 0160-20A (RL•.I.TAI PAGE >t or ¢
4
I
C-481188-12-0
PART III -GRANT CONDITIONS
a. Oenerat Conditions:
The grantee covenants and agrees that it will expeditiously initiate and timely complete the project work for which
assistance has been awarded under this grant, in accordance with all applicable provisions of 40 CFR Chapter f, Ssbpart
B. The grantee warrants, represents, and agrees that It, and Its contractors,subcontractors, employees and representatives,
will comply with: (1) all applicable provisions o(40 CFR Cftapter 1, Subchapter 8, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO the provisions of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 30, and (2) any special conditions set forth in this grant agreement or
any grant amendment pursuant to 40 CFR 30.425.
b. Special Conditions:
1. Payment Schedule
Payment may be requested for the Federal share of allowable costs
incurred. The grantee may request payment monthly in accordance
with the following guidelines:
A. Up to 80% of the amount for each task before submission
of the work
8. Up to 90% of the amount for each task after work is
certified by TD14R
C. The remaining 10% for each task when all the work called for
in the Step grant is completed, approved, and certified
Grantee agrees to complete the Plans and Specifications in accordance
with this schedule which has State Agency approval (35.917(4)(1)(2).
Task Completion Date
UC/ICR System 300 days after
G Submittal date of award
h Plans and Specifications 360 days after
k Submittal date of award
Plans and Speciflcations 420 days after
Approval date of award
J 2. The grantee agrees to submit to the Environmental Protection Agency
an approvable User Charge System and Industrial Cost Recovery System as
required by 40 CFR 35.935-13 and 35,935-15 of Federal Register, Vol. 43,
No. 188, dated September 27, 1978,
i
3. The grantee agrees to fulfill the Minority Business Enterprise (MBE)
participation commitments for A/E subagreements in dui rdance with the
documentation submitted with the application for this grant. The grantee
i agrees to take positive efforts in order to achieve the goal of 14 to
18 percent MBE participation in any other applicable subagreements in ac-
cordance with Region 6 MBE Policy and EPA National Policy published in
i Federal Register, Vol, 43, No. 249, dated December 26, 1978 and
40 CFR 35,936.7,
PA Pstm 1100.10A ;hv. 1.111 PAOt OF 4
I
I
4 ORANT IOLN T I FICA TION 188-12-0
h N[CIAY eONDrtIDN! iCOntln Wat ,
4. The grantee agrees to comply with the public participation program
regulations 40 CFR 25 and 40 CFR 35.917-5 as published in Federal
Register, Vol. 44, No. 34, Part V and Part VI, dated February 16, 1979.
PART IV
MOTE, The Grant Agreement must be completed in duplicate and the C:iginal returned to the Grants Administration
Division for Ifeadqunrters grant awards and to the appropriate Grants Administration Office for slate and local swards
within 3 calendar wee'~s after receipt or within any extension of time as may be granted by EPA.
Receipt of a written refusal or failure to return the properly executed document within the prescnbed time, may result
j In the automatic withdrawal of the grant offer by the Agency. Any change to the Grant Agreement by the grantee sub.
Sequent to the document being signed by the EPA Grant Award Off3clil which the Grant Award Offkial determines to
materially alter the Grant Agreement shill void the Grant Agreement.
OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
The United States of America, acting by and through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), hereby offers
ra grantlamendment to the, City Of Denton for 75 %of ail approved costs incurred up to and nit
'
o R•h Ttt ORO ANI rh ,ON
exceeding S 1 ,672.Q0 for the support of approved budget period effort described in application (including all
all l •NT A40UNT
frppli, ufin,r >,II,d,7i,,InIIN.,) City of Dentate. C-481188=12-0, 02/27/78 included heteln by reference,
TtT,a •NO 0•ra
1
ISSU IN0 OF PICA (rlempfo A, fminr.I,uf fun Off I, 1) AVARO APPROVAL Of PICZ
~ 9 ORf •NIi, TION!►DOR Ll1 OR lANIt•TIONAOORf!!
R. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6
Municipal Facilities Branch (6AWM) First International Bldg$
{ 1201 Elm Street 1201 Elm Street
xaS 7527 Gallas, Texas 75270
?
& T UNITE STATLS 0 AMERICA By THE U.S. LNVIRONMLNTAU RROTLCTION AOaNCT
,I TY Rt O IA,~ N A' T1T6W
4.17-80
lhls Grant Agree enl is sobJ►ct to applkfble U.S. Environmental Protection Agency statutory provWons and grant trguia•
t rions, In accepting this Award ur amendment and any payments made pursuant theteto,(i ) the undersigned represents that
he Is duly euthoriVed toad on behalf of the grantee organization, and(]) the grantee agrees (a) that the grant Is subject to
# the appli,-able provisions of 40 CFR Chapter 1, Subchapter 0 and of the provisions of thb agreement (Puts t thtu IV). and
4 (b)'that scceptuxe of any Paymcnit cunsritutea an agreement by the payee that the amounts, if any, found by EPA to have
t been uverp ild will be lefuttded ur eredited in full to EPA.
F !T ANOON gENALF OF THE OtS}OIIATE001lANTlIOACANt2ATI0N
IION►TURa Tr RIe NAM& AND TITY[ [
e r of Util tie
Nelson. t
Robert F
III WO-10A (Rio 1.711 FACE4OF 4
(
wmar
Cu-43
(Rev. 5/24/76)
PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION ITEMS
DATE 4-17-80
NAME OF PROJECT city of Denton
PROJECT NO. C-481188-12-0
Minor variations within an item are to be expected and will not affect its
eligibility. Any changes in the items, or substantial changes within an item,
however, will be considered ineligible unless reconsideration is specifically
requested and approved by the State Agency and the U. S, Environmental Protection
Agency.
ELIGISL FOR
DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS PARTICIPATION
YES No
Preparation of Plans and Specifications
S I. Cooper creek interceptor x
Lines CK (18"I, CL (10"), cH (18"), CN (18"), CO (124)
Ii. Hickory Creek Interceptor X
6 Lines HA (10")r HB (12"), HC (10")r HD (1211)r HE-1 (15"),
HE-2 (15"I8 HF (184), HO (210), HH (210)0 HI (IS %
Hi (27"), HK (27"), HL-1 (12")r HL-2 (15"), HM (27%
HN (24" Force Main)
ii III. Hickory Creek Lift Station X
IV, Pecan Creak Relief Interceptors X
{ Lines PB (15") , PC (15"), PD (18"), 2/3 of PE (21")r
I PL (450)r PK (180), PO (27"), PP (21"), PQ (21")
l`J
May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4
SUBJECT:
of port worth s for PParticipatironr agreements in Savings Association
Additions II S IV.
SUMMARY:
on January 2, 1979, the City of Denton entered into an in the
of Kingston
sewer lines throughs Section participate
oversize t of with
Trace. Estimated length of line is 2,401.5'i oversize from
10" to 18"1 a cost of $22,214.72.
On March 27, 1979, the City entered into the same type
3 agreement with First Texas Savings Association on Kingston
Trace, Section IV, to pay oversize from 10" to 16", estimated
a length 8281, at a cost of $9,012.15. This line was extended
50' farther to get it across Kings Row Street before it was
paved. The extra cost to the City was $554, making a total
of $310780.87.
t
ACTION REQUIRED:
I ~ City Council approval of these two projects.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utili oofd'the two at their meeting of April 30, 1980e
recommended payment
lines.
Respectfully,
R. E. Ne son
Director of Utilities
i
EXHIBIT I Participation Agreements
II Schoell, Fields & Associates Letter
III Certification letter of Director of Utilities
•r
s
I
v rr
TA~ MM" No
I
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
0 THE STATE OF TEXAS 1
!(NON ALL MEN BY THUS PRESENTSf
COUNTY OF DENTON 1
I
THAT WHEREAS, First Texas Savings Association wfootert-ttmfth 1-40.-
is the developer of certain property shown on the attached plat,
which plat is incorporated herein as if set forth in full* ,in the
City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and desires to serve such
property with offsite sanitary sewer facilitiess and
WHY the City of Denton desiras that such offsite sani-
tary soo 'ties be oversized and the City will participate
in the add! n.a cost of the oversized facilities pursuant to the
provisions of Section 25-71 of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texass
NOW, T31SMORZo T8I8 AGREEMENT, made this the 27th day of
March, A. D. 1979, by and between First Tex&L savings Association t
ALA.
44.9%Fiiitftar called "Developer", and the City of
~ j
Denton, Texas, a Home Rule Municipal Corporation of the State of
Texas, hereinafter called "City"1
WlTNESSSTHt I,
1. The Developer will install, by contract or otherwiset .i
sanitary lower lines and appurtenances to serve the property des- i
t
Ji}} aribed on the attached plat in accordance with all City of Denton
t ordinances, rules, regulations, policies and procedures. The said
sanitary sewer facilities shall be located as shown on the attached }
maps which are made a part hereof for all intents and purposes. i
2. The City's share of the estimated cost of said sanitary
sewer facilities is $9,012.13. Upon completion of construction and f
acceptance by the City of aid sanitary sewer facilities, the actual
cost of the City's participation in said facilities shall be deter-
mined and certified to by the Dirsotor of utilities and his cart!-
ficate getting out the City's cost of said facilities shall be
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
ws^.sRalY~6r•61~ieYE#'.iN~F:,Nx'~,;sw.•.,o.t.a.k,d.s.s
,
I
i
3. The City shall pay for its share of the facilities with-
. i
in thirty (30) days from the date of acceptance of the facilities, 4
or under much terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable to
the parties.
1. Title to said sanitary sewer facilities is hereby and
shall at all times be vested in the City.
i S. The Devslopa: shall and does hereby agree to Lidemnify
and hold harmless the City from any and all damages p.loss ot.lia-
bility of any kind, whatsoever, by reason of injury to property or
r
third person occasioned by any act or omission, neglect or wrong-
doing of Developers its officers$ agents$ employees, invitees, con-
s
tractors or other persons with regard to the pssEoru+ance of this
contsaat, and Developer will, at its own coot end expanse, defend [
and protect against any and all such claims and demands.
IN NiTNLSB HICEREOro this instrumont is executed in htiplioate
$ originals thisl~_3day of Narchp A. D. 1979.
CITY OF DLNTONp TMS _
Syw }
ATTE6Ti
1 CITY OF UNTONp Tins
._r F1R6TSMM3USAVl 89OClJ►TION
.
by 1
yy, i
F ATTt9Tw
x At/At. (fill
00
k
~MIawKAN a'giA 6'R>1644.iiN✓.'Y ~i.a:-i-.w,Arvs.sM ~.'..a,:. r s~c»se..... .w•,s.-...+.~+•^•
---TYT
8~p }8 San~CP.~ SlM1CR ~.•..1t,
M
""ON KINGS ROW
1~ C
26
{ 1 I ! 3 l 3 a
{ ` T
2 r ot, 9
{ B F
r .e»N 1 2 3 4 S o1p. 10
\cF0
{ t9 7 6 \ 12
32 31 30 29 26 °
{ 9 13
j { .30 27
` CHAPAARAL COURT 10 14
31 BLK
{ ~ to
16
32 21 t2 !3 24 29
it 16
d
s3
{ QO M le IT tb 19 14 IS , Ir
b ` y 34
J.%3 LA PALOMA DRIVE ~
} 36 BL k ' o
1 a rf 4 e. r e t 10
is
Ito ►"or
WA Mg.$
.
1
1111
I
EX}IBIT III
' :.~Y~yrySwYx?~d4d;i+'y~yydli3Sb~il1',aW.%.G.u.la.inw,.p.w.w~o+v-naxarn ,.u.~.a.:wr.s.-»s..
I
I
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
I
1'IIL 5'rATL OF TEXAS j
KNOT ALL MEN BY THESf. PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF DENTON j
I
TIIAT WHEREAS, FIRST TEXAS SAYINGS ASSOCIATION OF FORT NORTH
i
tv the Jevoloper or certain property shown on the attached plat,
which plat is incorporated herein as if sot forth in full, in
the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and desires to serve
such property with offsite•sanitary sower facilities; and
M WMEREAS, the City of Denton desires that such offiite
sanitary sewer facilities be oversized and the City will participate
in the Additional cost of the oversized facilities pursuant to the'
` provisions of Section IS-74 of the CoOo of Ordinances of the
City of Denton, Toxss;
+ NOW TIILRL'FORL, THIS AGr.ELMCNT, made this the 2nd day of
I !
i January, A. D. 1979, by and brtween FIRST TEXAS SAYINGS ASSOCIATION
j OF FORT NORTH, hereinafter called "Developer", and the City of
j? Menton, Texas, a home Rule Municipal Corporation of the State of
' Texas, hereinafter called "City"i
MITNESSETN;
1. The Developer will install, by contract or otherwise,
sanitary sot-or lines end appurtonancos to serve the property
described on the attached plat in accordance with all City of
Denton ordinances, rules, refutations, policies and procedures.
The said sanitary sewer facilities shall be located as shown on
tho attached maps which are made a part hereof for all intent.
And purposes.
t
2. The City's share of the estimated cost of said santfory {
sewer facilities Is $22,214.72. Upon completion of construction
unJ acceptance by the City Of said sanitary to or facilities,
the actual cost of the City's participation in said facilities
shall he dotermined and certified to by the Director of Utilities
and his certificate sottins out the City's cost of slid facilities
shall be attached hereto and made a port hereof.
4
.~~~y,i aaa .~a,y.;,.I Fit:+`Sh}...n-.. ri. .:'.Fydarn :.u,a,:. •....:,.,.s..a..yv•s....,_.~.,,.,,.»_......,:
i
3. The City shall pay for Its share of the facilities
within thirty (30) days from the date of acceptance of the facilities,
i
or under such terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable, to
the patties.
Title to said sanitary sewer facilities is hereby and
+hall ut ell tines be vested in the City.
S. The Developer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify
i and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or
liability of any kind, whatsoever, by reason of 10-•ry to property
or third person occasioned by any act or omission, r.dglect or
wrongdoing of Developer, its office:s, agents, employees, '
irvltees, contractors or other persons with regard to the performance
of this contract, and Developer will, at its own cost ind expanse,
i ,
defend and protect against any and all such claims and demands.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument Is executed i:l triplicate
originals this Ind day of 'January, A. 0. 1919,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
rr
BY:
MT ST#
,
roe + o
ecre ary
City of Dcaton, T t, tryexas
FIRST TEXAS SAYINGS ASSOC(A11ON
OF FORT W0MI
i
i
Ey: Q~"
+ o Epp is re nt
! ATTEST:
WOW our gor , .ss s ant
Secretary
IMA
BLK. 8
` ati; 113 ~ , i y s t
l SA 1.A1O0 ~i 123
^.'CNn4 feel. D1',-•:
so.
r
~ :1 T 22
1 f 41
gLK
is ~ r' ~ ,
i . _ . ~GST%.% y " TRACF. 4.0 Jr.
ti d
e r
,i. ISM '25' a; 124) V +:l,, r.
f" toll
. V
,r.y,hf,.~ ~arh dOF t~Ch
Y(jF~ r
✓QN. J`W OY' seer . s
+ er 1•e
r.•^1l A ..A., Aso It to so of,
ASf T'{+t45 SAYIN69 P. It *ON, 1 64, is
Ar'r)CIA o, fi 4T *OAT,
2 cna Te;rtrn 1. 1 yF~
^ •sI J qe yeti +M11~r'l~1 r.arl.
OM rRACE
section Twa ,r J 'tiny ECHO~,
+ ~..,•,'din,ta t'4tlelUNrfl+I+t1/' S'-~y~ ~ 5~~ `'h'~.~ '
• .'ki~+~ .~w.J~... .e,;r;.1.K><ieAf)~ >t f114yrrlCVtu,k
ar W'vR,rH:t r'y re, -TV .".r a~+'~ or"" ~5 .i" .r"'.~r•'w~: t'?'. 3y `
I
t _ 71
~I
WILLIAM 0, SCHOELL, P.E."
DEWEY E. FIE LOS, R.P.S,
HARRY L, GRAY, RE, - SCNOELL, FIELDS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENWNEGAS AND SURVEYORS
v 121414 FORT FORT WORTH DRIVE . OENTON, 1 TE
EXAS 10201
~ - 1917) 3851416, 3e7-0421 1 METRO 430-I692. OAINESVILLE US-8971
March 31, 1980
Mr. Earl Jones
Utilities Department
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: Kingston Trace II & IV, Utilities Oversizing, City of
Denton cost participation
i Dear Earls
1
? On the Kingston Trace It Sanitary Sewer, our records indicate
the followings
On site - none
G
Of site - 18" VCT 2401,5 feet $46,865.37
(Alternate) 10" PVC 2401.5 feet 24,650.65
City of Denton's Portion $220214.72
i
Kingston Trace IV
on site - 18" VCT $19,213,72
i ) On site - 10" (alternate) 10,201.45
Difference 91012,15
CITY'S COST FOR 60 extra feet 554.00
a City of Denton's Portions
Kingston Traca II $22,214,72
Kingston Trace IV $9,012.16
Total to First Texas Savings from City of $31080.87
Denton
a
e..wr.+.. n x'+srr:e,,. re..e rsr:...r-....:+-u.r+,«.wax nr..-..:..... a„....,_.,. _ _
i
71
Mr. Earl Jones page 2 March 31, 1980
Oft
I am sending you herewith copies of Ortowski Construction
Company proposal sheets and his invoices or payment requests.
Please call me if you have any questions.
i
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL, FIELDS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ R.14Delgadoi nh
enclosures
r s
i
f
i
I
i
I
i
yq '
I
r
'y~br~'I~9MTiNB~ro'N~''#''{.fjy!bif/YMJS4A1DYi:'rhLlvN{M"M.-rMr'!JM/Yar
I- G
Oft
THE STATE OF TEXAS X
COUNTY OF MUTON x
CITY OF DENTON X
Y, Robert E. Nelson, Director of Utilitieo of the City
F s of Denton, do hereby CERTIFY that First Texas Savings Association
has installe~T$""Peot of 16 inch sewer line at Kingston
s Trt.ce in accordance with the
Agreement entered 'intp-with the City of Denton on Ja ay~y 2.
• and March _2Z„ ; 1979. The 'City of Denton's cost of
subject participation is deLOrmined to be$31.7g0.87 dollars.
Such cost has been established by mu1tiply1nCJ!L19.yfeet of f
subject line by 59.69 dollars per Coot as established by
subject Agreement plus qther necessary costs
as follows: •
{
Robert C. Nelson, r,E. , i
Director of Utilities
City of Denton# Texas
P
i
~6"'~~tr••~-- Mn:e.:sw.~F.~kil,W$.~,..~pe~.~(*r~tiy~a..r.'s ,q.u.•riE, ri..n.N .a nma:.n •s .~w. e...,.:r.•urx.tsx.tiav..a.,:.r~.~ar.~hw+n..:r.aW Rs.':kWi:M4N1 A'M".A~tiLE~'b~gYG
{
May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECTt
Approval of Final Payment to Dickerson Constru-tion Company
for Stuart Road Sewer Line and water Lines on Stanley,
Thomas, Beilemeade and Mimosa Streets.
SUMMARYt
In April, 19790 Dickerson Construction Company was awarded a
contract to perform subject water and sewer line
improvements. This work has been completed and Dickerson has
issued an invoice requesting final payment. (See Exhibit I).
Final quantities of work have been determined and accepted by
the City. (See Exhibit II).
g FISCAL SUMMARY:
Contract Amount $362,778.00
i payments to Date $316,234.44
( Final Payment Amount $ 46,543.56
Source of Funde: Sewer Bond Funds 6 Current Revenue
ACTION REQUIRED:
City Council approval of final payment to Dickerson
Construction Co., of Celina, Texas, in the amount of
$46,543.56.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of April 300 1980,
recommended that final payment be made in the amount of
$46,543.56.
Respectfully,
R. . R el
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Dickerson Invoice
--T-7T
YEk10U1CAL g5'f1MA'fE p'0R PARTIAL PAYMENT
Periodical Estimate No r Period.
Name of Owners 7•:nt„
Addrel
Name of Contractor ,
Address_ 11 z- rryns 75309
Type of Project. 1-,,.,r,,,..,,,,. Estimated Contract Cost $ -LI.728,0]
Item
Description Unit Quan, Complt'd Unit Total
to Date Price amt
i
r,t'r i:r.• ' 30910.01
.7 ol~,oc
1 c381,OC
f,..i~,. „1•., 3,070.00
5, 310,00
1$7C0,0o I
1',039,50
I no Clio, 00,
} 1 ' ,rc+.il' it^ i _ + 1•~, +s3 "d1.Do,
519 14 0, 001
700,00
rl'v?^~ • ' 1~ 1"S•~, 2
r -v) 15,070.00
, ~ 3 i-.n c ,iar
v
9900
Tota Va ue o Or g no Contract Per orme 3,2
Extra Work Performed-Shown Above or,....,,,
d Materials on Hand-Shown Above a oreAttachedent
Total Value of Work to Datetatement,,,6,,,,,
Least Amt. Retained
Net Amount Earned on Contract,,,,
Least Amount of Previous Payments.,,
1 ,?1'S IJ,Tii
BALANCE DUE THIS ESTIMATE 114,
Estimate Prepared by and Recommended for Payment CITY OF DENTON
Dater
MASt
j DENTON BOY'S BASEBALL, INC.
i
THE STATE OF TEXAS f
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
COUNTY OF DENTON 8
This Agreement made this the _ day of April, 1980, by
and between the Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc. hereinafter
referred to as "Association", and the City of Denton,
hereinafter referred to as "City", each acting by and through
its authorized officials, pursuant to the following terms and
conditions:
l
` City agrees to deposit with the Association the sum of
Eleven Thousand and No/100 ($11,000.00) Dollars, and certain
e
y tees and charges hereinafter described, for the City's fiscal
f year 1980. Association shall submit on annual budget to the
Denton Parks and Recreation Department for approval which shall
set forth on an item by Item bads the rtes and charges herein-
after described, and the above Eleven thousand and No1100 i
{$11,OOD,DO) Dollars, the City will make one payment to the
Association on the let day of April 19800 In the amount
projected In the annual budget. City shall make such payments
solely from current revenues in the budget of the Parks and
Recreation Department, Expenditures shall be authorited for a
period from April 1, 1980 through August $10 1980.
I
N !
j ~ Association agrees to provide qualified umpires for all `
Boy's Youth League Baseball games and special games that are
sponsored by the Denton Boy's Bastbstl, Inc,
F Ill.
' k Association agrees to the following additional terms and `
t: conditional
a
1. It will establish a separate bank account for deposit
of the Eleven Thousand and No/100 ($11,000,00) Dollars paid to
t the Association by the City and all expenditures for strvlces
a
provided shall be made feon this account,
p,
O NTON BOY'S BASEBALL, INC, PACE 1
ii
s.
~,v "ti+YIYW/NP4+il. y'. 4.a i~no-ts r.sue MNm.e ~wrn.. .
2. 1t will establish, operate, and maintain on account
system for this program that will allow for a tracing of funds ,
and a review of the financial status of the program.
3. It will permit arithorired officials for the City of
Denton to review its books at any time.
4. It will reduce to writing all of Its rules, regula-
tions, and policies and file a copy with the Director of Parks
and Recreation or his authorlted representative along with any
amendments, additions, or revisions whenever, adopted.
S. It will not enter Into aay contracts that would
encumber the City funds for a period that would extend beyond
the term of this Agreement.
5. It will prepare and submit a report of expendituras and
revenues to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his
repre- sentative by the lit day of September, 1910.
7. It will refund the balance of the special account to
ff the City of Denton on or before September 1, 1910.
i 1. It will promptly pay all bills when submittedi unless
there is a discrepancy in a bill which should be promptly
reported to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his suth-
orited representative for further direction,
9. It will appoint a representative who will be available
to meet with the Director of Perks and Recreation and other
City officials when requested.
10, it will indemnity and hold harmless the City from any
{ Ind all claims and suits arising out of the activities of the
Association, its employees, and/or contractors.
i 11, It will obtain releases from the officials which will
1 release, Indemnity end hold harmless the City and the Asso-
clation from any claims, Injuries, of damages of the officials.
I 11. It will retain officials as independent contractors and
not as employees.
I Y,
The general terms and Conditions are as fotlowst
1. it any of the terms and conditions are not complied
084TON 80Y'S BASEBALL, INC. • PADS 2
ty.s.•^-.. ..«nMri»aiM✓iN r. t'~ m-
I
C. Rol
I
{
with by the Association, the City to authorized to refuse to /
make any further payments until the condition on which the
1
complaint is based is corrected to the satisfaction of the City.
2. This contract shall be subject to all valid rules, i
regulations, and laws applicable thereto as promulgated by the
United States of America, State of Teaaa, or any other govern-
mental body or agency having lawful jurisdiction.
1. Association to authorized and should give notices
requited herein to the Director of Packs and Recreation or that
person's aa'-norised representative.
1. Any contributions or gifts received by the Association
are not subject to the provisions of this contract and they
} t should be kept separate and apart from the funds, charges, and
fees covered by this contract.
5. Association shell provide its services and be Paid by
the City in the capacity of an tndependeat contractor and not
i
as an agent or department of the City. It shall have complete
1
control, supervision, and responsibility for its activities
under this contract including the hiring, supervision, and
control of Its employees.
IN WITNESS WNEREOr the parties hereto, acting under
&,ahortty of their govsrnlng body and board of Directors, have
caused this contract to be duly esecuted in two counterparts,
I{ each at which will constitute an original, a of the r day
of April, 14104
If yo R
CITY 0/ DENTO11, TEXAS
ATTESTt NOV'S USERALL, 1110, j
' SYt J
RM6N~
CITY OP OENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL YORMt
C, J. TAYLOR, JA., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Or DCRTON, TEXAS
bYt
06NTON SOtts bASIIALL, INC, PAO9 3
I.t-NAS•yy
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: May 6, 1980
AGENDA ITEM: Bid 8 8768 Water Meters
SUMMARY:
This bid is for the annual supply of water meters used by the City
of Denton. It covers the complete range from the residential ureters thru the
large commercial meters.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
These meters will be purchased during the contract period as ware-
house stock and charged to working capital account 05-98-87-09. The using
department will be charged on an as used basis. The quantities indicated on
the tabulation sheet are estimates only and may vary according to our needs.
ACTION REQUIRED: I
Approval by Council and award of bid.
F
ALTERNATIVES:
i Reject all bids and rebid or by on an as needed basis at considerably
higher prices,
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONr
We recommend this bid be awarded to the low overall bidder for items
1, 21 3, and 4 to Badger Meter Company. Badger is 64 cents per unit higher than
j Neptune on Item 1, however, the Badger meter has a built in leak detector that
is very helpful when working with a customer on a water bill complaint. Badger
also has a larger complete warehouse, service shop and test facility in Carrollton,
Texas.
a ~
We recommend items S, 6, and 7 be awarded to Hersey Meter Company,
These items are the large commercial compound meters. Hersey is not the lowest
F bid, however, the design of their meter is most advantageous to the City of Denton.
The horsey compound meter hat 2 bypass shut off valves that allow us to isolate
the small or low flow side from the large or high flow side. The isolation pro-
cedure is necessary when repairing or testing a compound meter without inter-
ruption of water service to the customer. These meters are installed at all three
hospitals, Denton State School, both univeristies and other locations where con-
tinued water service is critical. For this reason we feel the additional cost Is
justifiable and the Hersey meter is the best buy for the City of Denton, '
14
K' We recommend item 8 not be awarded since sufficient stock for the years
requirements are currently in the Warehouse.
1
E141IBiTS:
r: \
h,
Tabulation sheet.
Tom D. Sha4o C,P.M.
a
t
ray,. • .
71
DID 8768
DID Water Meters _
OPEN 4L Hc.sey Badger Carlon Rockwell Neptune Ernie
. 2,00p.m, _ Products Meter CO. Meter Co, InternAl Water Hadley
ACCOUNT I Meter Sales
TEr bT 1ff16N - EAbOR MOOR- IrE ZK-- VERF09` VMM MMbV- LN~O tT-
...L, 5/8 x 3/G_watgr met _ 1.5.23 water meter 26.10 " 2.00 54.00 ~ " ter~neters -_---76.30 52,00
4. mm -WAS 1N.6a
3" compound 869.00 840,00 787,97
6. 4" compound 11450.-0 I s237.50
l o381.80 7. 6" compound 1,689.00 3,100.00 2 662.00
_8, 2" fire hydrant 421.00 425.00 402:00 350,88 298,00
EU-S- Net 30 Net 30
N '
0
t
3
i
IR
E MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETINGI stay b, 1980
AGENDA ITEM: Bid 08757 180' Radio Tower
f SIfM,`fARY:
I
I This tower is to be used in conjunction with the new Central
Fire Station. A tower of this size is required to complete ~bq communi-
cation network necessary in the porformavice of the Fire prc.:.e: n and
Emergency Medical services.
FISCAL SUMMARY,
The funds for tha purchase and installation of the 180' tower
will come from the Capital ImproveTent bond fund as a portion of the
contingency fund. The low bid of $9,895.00 included the foundation. The
original contract for the Fire Station also included a tower foundation.
a The contractor for the station, C-Koe, has agrded to a $10293.00 deduct
from their bid.
S,
G t ACTION RE VIREDI
A?provsi by Council and award of bid.
' ALTERNATIIn I
None.
STAFF RECOMMEDATIONSt
We recommi.nd this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting
specifications of Wurstex Tower Company, The total bid price is $9,895.00.
EA7IISITSt
Tabulation sheet.
Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M.
Purchasing Agent
TDS/lc
~r
A ,
Y
erw,~SY ,
BID $ 8151 i■
BID 160' Radio Tower
Ted Wynn A & M Wurstex
OPEN April 10, 1980 Antenna 6 Tower Co. Tower Co.
ACCOUNT # Tower
R IO 0 E DC V_ M VK ND EWK-•,
- 'Erb ITEM 1. 1 180' Tower installed $10,336.00 $10,414.00 $8,395.00
2. 3 Installation of Antennas $1,200.00 $540.00
3. 1 Construction of Foundation $1,810.00 $650.00 $19500.00 z
I
{
Construction 45 da 90 de 90 da
ARO ARO AM
_fm f1t1v
1
i
I o
r
s,
{
May 6, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Awarding of Bids for Water Lines on Highland Park Road and
Kendolph Street.
If SUMMARY:
Bids were received and opened on the above subject water line
improvements on April 22, 1980. The project was bid in two
(2) sections allow the City the option of awarding
to contracts on each section separately or awarding one contract
for both sections.
The bids received were very good and have afforded the City
the following options:
if OPTION I: Award separate contracts totaling $30,883.95 to:
1. Lowell B. Allison Contracting, Inc., for Highland
Park Road in the amount of $18,939.55.
2. Murray Construction Company for Kendolph Street
in the amount of $11,944.40.
t ;
OPTION II:
Award a single contract for both sections to afar
E Corporation in the amount of $31,169.35.
The difference between Option I and 11 above is $285.40.
i
y,
a .a..,, {r., c. r
FISCAL SUMMARY:
City Estimate for Proposed Improvements:
Highland Park Road $40,060.00
Kendolph Street ?.9 700.00
Total 69,760.00
OPTION It
Highland Park Road $180939.55
Kendolph Street $11,944.40
Total x`30,883.95
OPTION II:
Highland Park Road $19,155,37
Kendolph Street 12 013.98 '
Total DTI69.35
Source of funds: Current Revenue.
1 ACTION REQUIRED:
Award contract and/or contracts on proposed improvements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utility Board, at their meeting of April 30, 1980,
recommended that Lowell B. Allison Contracting, Inc., of Ft.
Worth, Tx., be awarded the contract for the 1711 feet of 6"
waterline on Highland Park Road for the amount of $18,939.550
and that Murray Construction Company of Lewisville, Texas, be
j awarded the contract for the 860 feet of 6" waterline on
Kendolph street for the amount of $11,944.40. `
Respectfully,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT i Bid Summary
71
MMr'rlw.y
r
DID # 8759
BID_ Watermain Replacement
Circle C Millard Murray Dickerson Jay-Mar L.B. Allis m
OPEN 2:00 p.m. 4122/80 Const. Co. Heath Const. CO Const. Corp. Const. Co.
ACCOUNT 1
T T ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VS~t DOS- VENDOR-~ VEND OIl- E-KIT6 t
1. Water line replacement 239602.50 210420.9 199300.34 25,626.70 19,155.37 18,939.55
Highland Park rd.
14 124.00 14 537.0 11 944.40 181847.50 12,013.98 149896.40 V
Kendolph st.
I Z
a
a '
i
i
a
1
i
r
f.
T3/.
090
N1L •
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: May 6, 1980
AGENDA ITEM: Bid #8770 Utility Truck Bodies
SUMMARY:
These Utility bodies will bs mounted on the 3/4 ton cab and
chassis trucks purchased at the April 1$ 1980 Council meeting. The
completed units will be used by the Water Plant, Water & Sewer Dept.
(2 units) and Electric Metering Department.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
The funds for the purchase and installation of these bodies
will be taken from the 1979-80 budget account for each department.
04-61-91-04 $1,543.12
04-71-91-04 $1,543.12
04-60-91-04 $1,543.12
02-53-91-04 $1,543.12
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval by Council and award of bid.
ALTMNATIVES:
None.
j STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder of Motor
:ruck Equipment Company at $1,543.12 each including installation. Total
bid price $60172.48, five (5) day delivery after receipt of truck cab and
chassis.
i
EXHIBITS:
Tabulation sheet.
s
Tom D. ShAw, C.P.M.
Purchasing Agent z
TDS/lc
spa
HID # 8770
DID Utility Truck Body
Fontaine Motor Fleet
OPEN April 17, 1980 Truck Equi Truck Truck
Equip. Equip
ACCOUNT #
ITEM CR PTIO VENDOR E UO EN DOR VENDOR E DOR VENDOR VENDOR 'OOR
1. 4 4 ton Chevrolet Utility
Service Body--Installed 1,650,25 $1,543.1 $1,548.00
Total Bid price ►$6,601,00 $6,172.4 $6,192.00
Tprma Nptl--&t In Net 30
1
z.
i
C
i
I
City of Denton
Memorandum
May 6, 1980
Agenda Item:
Consider the final plat of Laurel Addition.
Summar
The property owner seeks to subdivide a 35.8 acre tract for the purpose of
developing single family housing. The tract is zoned single family (SF-7).
The developer is not being required to pave the north-south section of Highland
Park Road in that the comprehensive plan shows Highland Park Road continuing
southward east of this tract. (See attached map of comprehensive plan for
this area.)
All other requirements for public facilities have been met.
Recommendation:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the final plat of
Laurel Addition at their study session of April 30, 1980. The Planning,
Engineering, Fire, and Utility Departments have each reviewed the plat and
recommended approval.
r` Action Required:
The City Council should move to approve the final subdivision plat of Laurel
Addition.
Exhibits:
A) Memo
8) Plat
C) Excerpt from map of Comprehensive Plan ' ~`tt`
k
r
i
3 1
i
~~.xay+uyybL+ilYWaA+♦ {an.itew... a . . y
it
I I ~ 1 .I bg11 iV,H I. 1 ,
~Qt `U I t Q w i.
i .p1P, 1 IOOIh if I ItO10t c, K/•M I rlf+r,LIW I q I I 4 1 -
. P'tl 7,•1 bf1 t0' •j
h M'1,. I•IN'
ITT
r PS9 Z 44
r 11 a. t 1. 1 1' 1 1 1 I{ C
IN r1 M IN ~ 1 O
•
N11f INIf „N HM lIM lIM YN NN NK IIN /IN bN' nN Ml t1'
T A'!
~oK Na NM "T Y~
l , 1f 1, [ /1 1 [ ~ 11 1 1~
Tyr ,1 h 1 J'IK 1 E
t E ~ N 7 ~ ~ Ir 1 = 11 ! ~ 1
r t ,1~ to t fo I Ie ,j t t 1
form'
1 I n~ n. j 7•' +I t' 1
f + 1
I f .I f1 t 11 / 11 1
Ft •I It 1 1 or { 0 II~IL~6
IN q
A r I i L. a ,I, r e1 ti. r to p,. V t
Y ~
I t ~ s 1 i [
I flrtrp/t lYAI'Y. '
, / roa tors
14
w i` n is u a n a E w
I 'a a L 4'
II , ~ It a 17 , 11 ~ f1 II ~ II ',A
• 1 l
11 II II II U 11 11
N,w
Is is
1 N j l to N a It 10 11
I n ~I n I
ur Ti n n ~S It n= 10
$ w j If a 0 1 4„ •M i l Nw ~I = 1 H • i
3 . 1 . WWW '3,
For mar Its
so-
FINAL PLAT
1 .N JNrI.,~, t0~R011l1TFON -LUSIEl1.1►D9111.9tL 1
i. CON~Ul TOON, ISN [[NI t+oolimm l llthl gift Or It Ilf" ( •
OLN tillA A!
.ItOp y
•it .1 it rNr .e „1., . Otllidl t0ulrtr,tet{t 101 Ye [M
1 _ RECLW0 Ir) I S 0
I
I
it
,Y 1'~, f. j' J~?;%!' ~ ~ ~L~• _Jl~ ~ ~I II III ~Iry!
II 888' I~ .1'
' 51 1
I`I{ 1 p
IrJ+ y I li
ii ~ ~ a t qtr]' ~ ~ r n
"ILI
V
:Z .a'.. .7 I G It 'i.
• t y~ •Aai~'-r~1 '}1,~:^1 Itl ~l ~'r I`i ~y I~ A
~10~
:r {y`'F//r= t7 ~ti.-*}f rr, f'M I -Afb' I
P. [ ML ~ GtiK7
' 1+/ ~ f" ~ JF e~iitrlj ~i j. g ~f ~ ~ y
~ t .i - Irl y3 M p. t.k a ♦YrN~
' III ,ry U li 1 E •.CP i '1 7r"wt .r.
i yc / ` _ r itr ; y, r`. I a ~ r 1 r '~~t.
?
' I n • V^rLtir 1 H4 ; f } t ` f~ 1! T ; 'j~T ~yY,,( ~ a
I ~ S / ti 0'- v ^~Jt. I w L - i. _ i I {!r ~ ~'11 ~4~j, s. ~dri 31 Try >~rrl~}~ 1
e lti r w 1 ,.,i~Y LJ~~II Ir PJk ~i
. aM n. ter ch at• > f >r•• ~ 1 i+. +
r1 1 1' I'll 31
.•t} e~''r 1 111 t: "Yy ,6I Z ,
G l
Zr 1 y " 1 • I If
I~r
Laurel Addition "
ar" ` I. A
1
t
0/1
I
j