Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-05-1980 AGENDA Jr DENTON C111 COUNCIL 02' 7E 1CITY 980 August 5 BROADCAST LIVE ON NNTU RADIO# 68.5 F.M. Tue Regular Meeting of the City council at 7100 pM'al Building August 51 1980 in the Counncs of business wills beuconsidered. i at which the following of July 15, 1. Approval of the minutes of the Reofljulye 22, 19801 and the 1980, the Special Called Meeting of JL,1; 28, 1980. Special called Emergency Meeting the petition of Mr. Joe 1 s of 2, Adoption of an ordinance annexation g ofd approximately 6.2 tacreate 35W Belew reques:.ln9roxtma%ely 350 feet west of Inters land located roxtmately 1,010 feet south of Zinnner Motor beginning app and Zoning commission k IVans. z-1437. (The Planning F recom~eends app f 3, Public hearings zoning classificationue on requesting ' k A, This is the petition of light industrial (L1) beginning tract totaling approximately 847 acres located along 1 the west side of interstate 35W k el 11010 feet south of Ziauter M tOf Vans- Zp1437imat(The planning and Zoning Commissio recommends approval.) E W. Belcher requesting s is B. ahchnngetof ioningoEr m office (0) to commercial (C) The property is located along the classification. ive# west vf cook Street and north side of Dallas Dr Block 2 This begins immediately north h of Simmons Street. 1. ~ Parcel is designated as city Lot 26, commission i.-1454. (The Planning and zoning recommends approval.) petition of mt. Charles P, Wilkey s is tha change of zoning from single family C$ 'Thirequesti ng aneral squar ecfeetifiinsize. o The mately retail (Sh-7) toxl tract applreolocated along the east side of Cleveland property approximately 74.5 feet south of and Zoning ve. -1455. (The Planning Eaglet Drbeginning commission recommends approval.) ~ a i ( City Council Agenda August 5, 1980 Page Two D. This is the petttion of Mr. David Dunning (representing Henry S. Miller Co.) requesting a change of zoning from two-family (2-F) to general retail (OR) classification on a tract approximately one (1) acre in size which begins approximately 800 feet southeast of the intersection of Loop 288 and Interstate 35E. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Appearance by Janet Berry of 320 Mission Strejet, Denton, j representing the "Concerned Citizens" for the purpose of I presenting a petition to the City Council. 5. Appearance by representatives of the Dallas Cornithian Yacht Club relative to their request that the City of Dallas review their present policy of water withdrawal from City of Dallas water supply lakes. 6. Appearance by T. E. Uland of 1800 Cordell, Denton, requesting a variance from the Sign ordinance. 7. Appearance by Fayez 'i. Salaita of 1400 N. Elm, Denton, relative to the Siste, Cities Program and other matters. 8. Ordinances A. Adoption of en ordinance regarding the petition of j Mr, Joe Belew requesting light industrial (G1) zoning i classification in a tract totaling approximately 8.7 acres located aLing the vest side of Interstate 35W. B. Adoption of an ordinance regarding the petition of Mr. E, W. Belcher requesting a chargge of zoning from i office (0) to commercial (C) classification on city lot 26, block 231, located along the north side of j Dallas Drive. Z-1454, C. Adoption of an ordinance concerning the petition of Mr. Charles P. Mulkey requesting general retail (GR) zoning classification on a parcel approximately 8,538 square feet in size, The parcel is located along the east side of Cleveland Street approximately 74.5 feet south of Eagle Drive. i i E t j k 4L~ A City council Agenda August 51 1980 Page Three D. Adoption of an ord'~nance reigarding the petition of Mr. David Dunning for general retail (GR) zoning classification on a tract approximately one (1) acre in size which begins approximately 800 feet southeast of the intersection of Loop 288 and interstate 352. 91 Risolutionso A. Approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit a grunt application to the Department of Energy. 10. Status report on Downtown Square Parking Enforcement. i 11. Renewal of the contract with Sally Erdman for the Bird Control Program in the City of Denton. I 12. Receive the final draft of the 1980 Power Supply Study and I consider further action. ' I 13. Discussion on TMPA. 14. f.tatus report on the Lake Aubrey Project. [ 15. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda nuthorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Bide/Purchase Orders: f 1. Bid #8794 URD Aluminum Cable for warehouse stock 2. Bid 18791 Paisley Street Paving & Drainage B. P1ats1 1. Approval of the final replat of lot 6 and part of lot 7, Block A of Brownwood Addition. 2. Approval of the final replat of lots 1 and 24, ti and part of lots 2 and 23 of Block 5 and all of lots 1, 2, and 3, and part of lots 4 and 7 of Block 6 of sequoia Park Addition. l y E I R City Council Agenda August 5, 1980 I Page Four 16. Executive S@SSIone A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A,T.S. C. Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V,A.T.S, D. Board Appointments - Under Sec, 2(g), Art. 6256-17 j V.A,T.S, 17. Consider Board Appointments i i f I I r f i 1 j 4 32 City council Jn1y 1S, 1980 Regular Ke•tfng of the City council of the city at D6aten, .'•rq4, 1nlfdor' :Uly " ' 1980 fa the Caa4011 Cbaab•r of the Uuafof9al P7lzSUIT i Mayor Dt wart, Ksyor Pro Ton Tallaforro, Kembor4 dtnp►•as, vela, oailey, lopYla4 444 16x41• City K4s•g6r YIartaaf, City Attorney Cri4 C. J. x07 Isaeem 1101t. at std City Iaaratary t Kotlea v01 sad• b the ala0tea of the l6gnlar It6.1lagtefro,1f0o4ded by sophist that Ca12ad N66tfng of J217 1, WO be a 7 11 1980 and the Ipaetsl eh6 a6n1l41 of July 1 should road,. 4bdrd4 except atidt l i to a'a A) at It failed b60a12a6 a 1/S qolarity lm ratu"fo got a to b I' The Cenaall e0 6e146red adoptlea e Apprao~ Satlea for 11leos Celdwll mad t a 241011111146 of Dar Id Spent for their many ye42.0 of 464144t4d e43prtoo ea the Library bard a• follow 1 (A) ll10LUTZOi 19 APPRxclATtoff Op W302 CALDVILL losing, the D•etea Pnb1la Library bard of Ih4 City of Boston !m iii+ia 400 of 6107irrt loira6u r"&ad e Coldvoiltraa 1988 12atl3 1980 mad , ho 966 the n IyaIIAIt,oa during mail term Ilia" Caldvall "'44 is Adviso 16er6rary of ea Ih6 Iana9801 Iaarlnnptitrtett worth major 1600070• Cantor and 1977 12at11 19101 $ca 76' T6sao'Llbrar7 Aseeefatlas tram 21Q1141eyed6 eh th6d•Cdlityeatof•d m fortunate to saving •a• ad 0214ta,dlag services of 11Saer Caldwell, for 06410n has beam extremely rdj4 aeay years 04 Yu devoted to Rio Dallas Public Library Nov, fin troll, as iT 1200trID It T1a CITY Conn tL or 011701 , TIust in 029Y OP That t►• alae6re mad Tarr appr6eltttem of Moor CaldralY felt by the eW1444 mad officers of the City of Dtatea, it forms l to het is a 147261641 maaaor by spr riding e►la 16celutiae 0posol"10d effltial 21412164 Of the City of D6atoa, lad fervardlag to her s he 1 copy hornet, j PA1110 AID AtPIOTID this the llth day of 61o1y, A,D, 1080. 1 j i ATTI1Ti CITx oPpON, x 6 i CMi OP DIFl01, TtLl1 h 2: TATC42o JI., dylpplATTOAr1t OMT OF DMON, flux. the Iotolotteatbea aamod, 0477oll call "tootoia by ,+pYia1 that 'a", e0osallyariyo, ophlad aya, 146ph4eo "ay",yTaililiieo 474 "are", Kotlaa earned 4d4alaeoaly, i I Jnlr 1!, 2960 Coaela46d 93 i u> faBOLUTION If ApiffCIATION OF DR- DAVID F. dpfcr W"Aud, Oka Dontoa publla Library Board of the City of Deals% to l served on the oefae one of 114 Most Valued %ambers* or. David r, 046k, who has esrved as Chairman Of SaidA7)as a tro%or 1969 froan19661uatfl 4460 and YilxfxAO, daring raid term Dr, David p, Op46k ssrved a V!46-Chair. { man et eke AdVisor7 Lonaall, tart worth Nador 2eeolrea Center lros 1 1913 1aOl1 19111 Trlstra, ft re46atatlra to Dlstrlot VIZ, Texas + r^ Tatla ry AflooLltrary1012 olarlem9l4ilVlat Chairman, TrUO446, Round 1 Tab1e, Toone Library Asssalation is 191 i nCh&lrotao dserved an Trusttheee, sound Panel for the Governors Conference as Libraries aOteLgvjtndr Advis ory Ceamitte•, Texas Otate Llbrsrr In 191!1 and wffffAO, the City of Donlon has t46n extrestly fortan40e to bavtad •afarred Oka 4e3104444 mad outatsadiae 4ervloes of Dr, David p, Spook, for Ito many rears t► tan devoted to *be Diatom public Lltsary 2ear4l CO NOW, T1111►Of36 is it 1280020 IT Tax CSTr COUNCIL Or ?ax Orly Or ➢xaTON, TfrABi That the Sinatra mad wars appreolatios of Dr. David to speak, felt Vr by the Helmand and erfleern of the City of Denton, be formally **stated to his In a permanent manner b Q upon the otflaial minutes of tie City of Dinlea !Red terrardlaglto d him a true copy horeot. FA00fO AND AfpfOVND this tke l$th day of July, A. D. 1960. ATTfM OSTY O► DfNTONr ?xLll Of .C O eiCIA]fI CSl2 Of Df2TON, '.V r ArpNOYD AS TO MAL ►Ofx, I 0. 1. TAnOa, n „ CITY ATTONSSY CST? Or D21101, lxrA! 2YL /at Haltom was side 1 tht 246611416! to passed, y ell4411 v, oaeeadkd ty Gala ghat ■ r 02 fell sa31 eaye" Ito are., Roesler " •rt" ►oa• /t6D014as k!ss , faller 'era", Iola "aye", ?allafcrro layeR mad Stewart "apt", Wallis tarried uaaalsouslys 10 PUBLIC xNA111004 (A) the C644111 aaaalatr46 itfaa lawlrod In the ravlelem of the animal es$trot ardiaaaro. 1 Mayer Stewart opeead Oka ptblia hearing attar a lrtef- J tae by eta Assistant atir Raaatar SIR$ 9e1e4 Li who .0 bei Tears follows remarks tram t►s tale! of 19 Sltt46ne 11) Does Should Rover rue. letea, f) Area whsrs does art kept should 11 kept 41441. Noveral were Opposed is limiting the lumber of ( y) aainals a parson eta keep, `f) Oka Thereshouulldlls "toaLeaverefar lffiierept ego OR srlrato frate"r far ae 1R14aakod des, tb) !ten must 1a stream austral, parttetlarlr In f eke pat atls"44 area, M 3 34 July 17, 1980 Contlnucd ' T lfa44 kaw4 hatter edatrel at the cal no Problem to ;00 ton. s several were !6 peopl l e, not pole, 9 ral were ce4oeraed with dm ! !0 a state law Om flits,) 'P ad dose. (There (30) It to difficult to caferoe the prevent ordiaanee as is the 04 8* !a all 641861 ordiasaau , ((12 31) We oan't 1a4101610 got relationship, f f} 184181rition mad Atfeotivo, a touch leask law can to most (17} Q uarantiaa of animals who tile. V* ea , 0 ({t7 AdoyOtl a ofgpots from6Centerl lot y6dvis0ab16. Ecaark0 Dr te Ceaaolli ~I ' i to lialt atsSephe40..t0 there 0084 v6r for Dill's to have a l 0 peyulaklop br sparing and aanterlac of male does?Cr a permit oar AalaaltControl cOffloornieemee6erfteelive, mad 96 should aatul0. Property for loon with odor aad0other.airapollaeleereaVa alsoaIn favor of a f da inponadmen I with higher tone for a41 2 at owner, dialing epeelttdal Savowad C6t6 should also be r , Prevent the ►ele•.taepon0tbtlitr of pat Owner to t4 raist a9 of e:oltd salmals, at u ouet. I~ ooeyrehealevarreportlanethe rolefofh/heccaaeoa lnaeai0 seolety. she praised the efforts r tare a Aalu1 Coatret caller. of the Cenaell 4o0sks she Pa!ated eu1 the araooss4 Bev ibl* inlmalra erdlaaats 4kOa.ld Cover, s0 did otker eitlsaas mad the Connell. lawn maH06ltey..t an OPPo ad to registration of pats, la!asa he worked tat* as ardlaaase. tam agatsst as ode 1 Program. p ,ten the Staff iolNnee was made Or aapktas, $*$added ty bola to direst P2e1e4t Ike erdts4aeddtortherCeaaielllfar seCollro s0ldl ordt 604 40 . 4arrlcd tinaniaonslr. stallag %batAfollevis ally Na4144r Ilse Cole %rlefod the Connell, draft of am °rdlaaacasfortla000144r eloaear. 441oracy 0aa have a j to his kta hidthe Cecaell losoldersd as apparam a tr Tama Ee en 6114601 aft j ► Preoarty, dmaa solo/tve f or, soda aa 4ee471tod the Property and tutoatod that the Prta had pan irecessed by thk aDPrailes. lv6 late kayo: s/6wart advised Of. gooses that the Caaaelt eeeld s { e;aallve rrNl stilled. leaa. ety mad that the utter dam to deasldered ly u E 012IEA19211 thi tollewlse ordlaaades were prooata42 (A) aEDttAlol 10, s0.74 4 At OEDUAtCt Ailpplpd Trl rot :t0 AS rAltll Mt ADOt110 As At AppMtgto US Ijj op olal"IS of Trt at?t of Dt"Or, tM81 of 0222IA70t 10 'UP1221 10 02"Atr PrOpllt21 0011 At A PAST Of .10 AIM M 0 atDC Aloof 1St, At tlPxt or Ttl O►►:CIAL TAI yAp of to Mt of most TlIAg, Asa NOtt pA !y XttCVU n r 01sar:l ttprit PEAS 11002MIAtD trttl:li Ata Igo to it OED1>/lrCr ro, o• e 4f LAt Z At E►►rC?tT! DAP:. t "`oat' Y ( 1~ I 1 I daly 15, 1980 Continued Ta1SaC•rVal e•C4a4•dbbreColllor7thatltherOrdioaacaatoapassed.b70n roll "call rota SteyN ns "era", 9ele "qa", Napkins "era", OaS1ey 7e , Teenier ale . ?a1lalereo •are• aad Starlet "ale", italics Tarried. (S) OEDINANCI 10. 80.55 Wades E. Wilson) A A$ $N S ODDIIABCS ANSNDINO 113 908110 NAP OF TES CITY or DSTTON, TtXAet, TIN CITYVOF DSSTOE~ TEXAS, Ait OSDIGSCS 10C069"1l AIM A$IAIDOMAY APPLIES TO LOT! %T.1, 18, 19 AND 19.1 Or SLOCT NO. 378A AS SLOWS TSIS DAIS ON TEN OPFtCtAL TAX MAP or TES CITY Of DENTON$ TIIAte AID MOST PAeTICULASLT DESCSINtD TIZININI AND DSCLASIEO AN IMOTITT DATS. i thit the Ordi motion W41 0446 by nance to passed. onlrollr0411 voted Ionizer eye" lots ""ale", 3t4ybus "ale", 0allay "are", talkies "are", ~ Tallef•rre aye Add. St wart "are", Ne ti 4e aarviad4 of Je• S•1er(0) as saaexaltes ordls uc4 #endorsing the petition 9-1451, for axeesallon of 6,3 +erod of that Saeatod feetorauthaat toot twas 5Introduced nbeforectheaCeunol1. d Q Motion n A4 faetitue4 uaeaationayroau die 1. 0asrollesellevote void •o "a e" Vela 'aye". Osilcy, "a a so kilt rse 7 , "a e' "Sys" , y Taliate 4,atdpb as "aye" and S4 wart"Aye Malian aarri d 6. etSOLUTIOSS, 6,165.65 oq%Ari fail at Land actuated at tlasiartheast corioriot4i1y r `bd inter seI4iea Of West tiakary add Areaas t ran prdsatedi ` ILteocUrr`t Venus, the city of Dallas tilde it aed•Taary to 4140414 of a certain treat at tend located is the City of Dallas$ Tonal, aad acre ln11r described bsiswt had WetlSAS, the below dosarlbfd tarsal of load was tat ter bit as M+y 15, 1980 aad the it halt bid of Can Thousand Risks Judged TVu4r. six ud 50 Conte (11,836.60) Dollars wad awarded is to km N. Ayr s=teal f M ArrlaeNea,Catroe Iteftasconsiderationrat 11 69444cIs a fair aid +crowd Valli of ste► described propertyt ! love tttettOtt, It IT 120OLVSD ST Ttt CITY COUNCIL OF TIN OtTT Of Dt/TOSe TEXAS, TEATI 1. the Oily Attorney Is hereby aetharilod to prepare whatever total d4ona4sts art *Glossary to Gantlet# the treaster of property so d4ldribed bdovt f All that 44ruis lat# tract or parcel of lead tries and lilac sltsated is the city and coast? at 0411440 $late of tonal halsc part it the I. fsokalahl Server, Abstract e0. 006, 424 bolas path at tat he Slatk 1 of u• Amended Collate Addltloa, to a44ittea to tb♦ Oily and 042217' of Deltas, 4110 $4dof part Of a treat Of lead deavoy44 to the city of pulse by an Award of etecial Oommllstes4rd tftftf at tke Couty Court at Law at Boston 4022170 Texas to the proceed. isle of the city of Dates, Tuu Vs, Fred Atriatt lii tax@ at U ad 04 as revolter s► to?# led to Cara It" Worl7 4u4rl14d ao to llow I I E 3s Jvlr 17, Liao Castle,*, I201172N0 at the 40athr01t Carder Of Said treat 8414 Dotal at bpsin• etas lrlas In the corth rlsh% at x►r llae et ltekorr Ctelat and 1lAdsotSltakorrtItr 6 944ktheaOr 1orisht et rar 1Snehafl~eatSfrlri4l{ TnrC1 vast aloag the south taandatr lino of said trots Sala We, the north risks Of rar 1124 of 111korr 61root a dlstaaes at 40.0 toot to a patat for a aaraorl TINNCN earth 1 06, 96" rut a dislaaee of 1ty,16 toot to a point for a Career to the north todadarr 11,16 at said /rant{ 1118C1 oast along tko 4orth tovaderr list of said treat a distance J of 13,0 tut to a joist for a career, game togs the Northeast corner of laid traotl T11NCl Soatk along the last boundary 1114 of said treat a dialoaaa of 11!,06 flat to the pleas at udfoolas sad 4011141sing 61161.6! square toot of land, more or legs. PIOTTDID further that no dart Cats shall be pormlttod an th• sbore dolarft44 tract of lead. Dal !ta Share atk%Oitr aO eOaatas to heraby fnrthtr ,kuttorls4d to rr ail raasosablo ed Hs of eloalag, and after Its ptrusr 444Uapprovallfateaeordaaa rlth the~`pr visa 1 at the Dolton City Charter. rartSldns PASUD AID APPIOr1D this the 15th day of July, 1900, ATTStTr 0tit or D112ort 111iG1 3/h3/d~ CLlY 07 J;"T01, flu$ I A.PnOTSD AI SO L16AL talk A2TOInTnO2TT jOF 001101, TNIA1 1tr_h1 Motlea was made ►r H4palas, sotes4od tc f41a that tko 9 24041MU04 ke palled, as sell sail fete Callon vq$ , to k10a 06446 vela are , ttoph4aa raye', Wistorra 'ard" aad Iterart Sara". T Noting serried. (1lae14r r44'net pr4saslletfal saute is this sailor,) antherfgfag t(h2)M no COUad11 oeaollorea the fellovla lose Deates 004 1144trt;el teveretile Orode/ig Agreaiatartfkathetrle! e Atsk/sea, Tapoka ua delta 74 Nallvar Compaars 1 f a_ Q_`t o f USU M201 A1210112114 INS MATOI 20 U24 9TI PON AND ON 1l1ALP OF T11 off? Or D11TON on suctl2CAL town b2NN posit Antrim V1TN ~~~J11 211 120121016 2o711A An SANTA P1 1A26YAY COMPANY, as 22 13800" tY TIN alit COQNOIt or 211 CITY OP 02"ON, twit ~IDr 1, TU Marer is keretr autharlded to aro4nts as behalf of U• City of Delta, Tesas, eat e1441r1461 paver llad draodle# str44sast 400id. anted an 2;3?kl, a dopy of ease %sing alia4hod hereto Sad side a part Wee! far all purpalas. I i July 19, 1960 Cottlnufd 97 rAS11D AID A1r1OYID ibis %te 16tt day at July, 1910. hl _ • IIOIAa 0. STN A R AAjTTIST~ CITY OF 2INT01, T17U6 016 LI 15M CI1r IICIITA T CITY OF 011108, TUA/ AVVSO►ID AS TO 610AL y01Xi l C. J, TATLO1, JI., MT ATTOIe1Y CITY OF PISTON, UZAS III /a/ Nation was dada by Noptiaf, ascended by Yale, that the Sfao1ution We passed. Oa roll call rote 044th as yeOatlfr "aro", Yela "cape"1 Naphtha "cape", Ta1latesvo "cape::t:10:, nd S/fw rt "are". Notloa earrtfd. (Iatfler was cot protest dnrlal eaon thin matter.) T. maticA van side by ye1a, loaoadfd by Napkins to cathorlu Vr last tespfu M os for a .661 acre partihl treat of laid cad possibly as additieaal .601 save treat of load for the raroutial cad aesatr- d nation of lfinler Strait. mottos Carried, l Oct a. Xatloa vas made by Cellar, 14tooded brr Napkins to approve filet ppayseat to J6644 cen•traatian Company In NO a8e641 at 110,TO6.It for overvidth paving on clads Nov. xotlaa carried. mattoo vac side by Nopkla/, attended by vela to asp rare {I` final peysfst to Isaror-Ckrtatos, Sae. Is $te ameast of 16,177.!9 for overvl4th paving as lonntf area. mottos tarried, 10. gotten was aide by ssephese, seaended by Napkins to•:apprevf _ a ae M rsat with Alexasdar Brant aid Compeer for 411ditlag,sor*L448 for the flaaal teat 19T9-60. motion dappled, Comaeii mfmbor vale asked etas the Conseil be, advised it a eaot 44441stios odours, teas, bat thatyitasay extra forkato to** thetCaspatyavill tillvthe City ter it, it. 9011111 A011W Notion was side by Tallatarre, a44e1444 by role %bat the folierie,g Qeldfns Agfada to approved. Xottat carried, j (A) sins/poscuel o1D11et I (1) a!d 161630 $bela It" ileac at Wastewater Treat- i seat Plat avarded to Yentbreet Vegas 9espaay at 1111690, i ts aid /alai, baekhof loader, awardfl to folats sauipseat at IId,191. U l1. The Connell retolded late is aalive leaaios it lotto past € to 4114611 legal sattorf, real eatats, personnel amid boar/ appalntnestf. it 19. The Connell raeesrasod into hhiio Sogdian at ltso &.a.$ 3 1417 l6, Load to asnetsee stet to 6411&1 vas to be takes. N141is$ 44146 uod at list a.a$& Jalr 16, 1960, a a ' I I City C0❑aau ' July ~Z, 1960 Sgeciel Called tutlag of the City Cauaoll tl the City of Denton, Ten# at 6100 p.a., T,usdar, July U, 1960 la the Ctiy Manager's Coofer•lace Room Of the Nuaiaipal Auildiag. t MIND Aror Pro Tom Tallmlerro, N®bers Sopttos, Stepbeas. Pete and Ostler, 1 City ltanad.r ChrU 6artun4, City Attos.,my C. Taylor I AMENT1 Mayor Stevut aed Comall Nember Calley. 1. The Couaall recessed Into Wouttre Semstoa to discuss le.al utters. real estate, personael and bom ippolotsents. 2. The C4uoetl reconvened into Pubita 8eision at 6110 p.m. to aatouooe that no ofttatal eatloa was to be taken. Meetleg adJouroed et 6140 p.m. i i 71 MY I ~M l o e o . i j i p i i i i j f f , City Council 1 Julr 22, 1960 Special Called Muting of the City Cannon of the city of D#n06, Texas at 7100 ; p.s., Tuesler, July 22, 1980 in the Council Chamber of the Nuaicipal Building. PRPSM Karar Pro Tom Taliaterro, Kembua Napkins, Stephens, Yala and Galley, Cit, vAmMor Chris Hartung, City Attorney C. J. Taylor and Cit;' Neat-,Lry Nrooks Holt I ANSEM Kayar Stewart and Cuueeil Kosher 0-Lildr. 1. The Council coasiderrd Nuoicipal Housits is u -a as followsI (A) Status Report on the City of Denton Kumicipal Noustaa Finance + Corporation. Prank IMdaaich of the First Southwut Company stated that there were t» things standing in the way of the proposed loan program-4onerustoo 91 actinm sad status of the hoed market. It added VAt legislattoo to new styaled. Be stated that there is at least some relurtance seeag some 'lend marketing 14#00441 because of the "No Decision" of Joagreso, 1e want on to sky that Denton Lad alsewher4 has falling iaterect rates am the conventional home mArktt and It this tread eontlnucs it would sake the tut exempt bonds unappealing. hMelrm Of ?*a t out that First sad Kitchell to sake astudy m of the a~arkrt,Ce P~i Scuthwett will pay the 020,000 cost. No stated that the city will not to 4 = fimanolally responsible foe thlt propeead toed ttaue. to advised :hat the City Q will have to haw guidelines u to the ability of a borrower to pre. Kedsnich advised that it is vat rvq~Srtd of the C^unatl to take ►etlon by pullet a resolution tonight. Is fact he recomenaed that motion not bo taken now. Kotioa was made by Yale, eeccad#d t/ Napkins to proceed with a Phus T study try Pest, Karviak Led Kitchell, to be paid for by first South; oat Company. Motion carried unanimously. (d) The Council vas to have considered a Aesolution tubaitted by ` the Denton County Nou"ing Finance Corporation. Il The Council ecncurrod sot tq we the Risolutice, City Naaagor Narwg seated that to would advise the County Judge. 2. The Council considered AS L';uranda by Dusty Schmei4ar. W. Schneider prueatod a petitttn containing L,110 names to have a Schneider hWVal verym SALMO h !n Sid dw Forte and of tthe COUAdirxager's Office. Ks. flt,m wd w Tallifors-o are grerely avia# of the situation"city Council !s met dragging Ito { j There ware several instaml41 of boaiag and other types of rudea so 4 from the audience. dhea Sehaetdet was unable to get su answer to he h►d demanded, and agar a question tsar Coutass Kembor R nMes, Sataoider plmkel up the petition Lad tbrty It at Council Hooter eteptus, that walked out of the Couadi: Cheer. a 1. Notion was ode by Noputs, !scandal ty Hensley st iaespt the bid of or. Yam Andean for the disposal of excess City property !n the smdumt of 11,006. 1 (This ratter Val discussed at the Setting of Jelly 11, low.) motion Gartiad L1LnirmWly. , F Y, Sill reitb, mrehamt 6m the downtown square, spoke relative to %bg #4 marking of ears on the square. Ed pointed out that oars are bat betas sorted, Admisistratita Assistaat Jill Angela Ldvised that dcrltg the period of June 1Wano 10 there ware 211 tickets Issued en.tbe squatti 417 hew been that thit$bil lare aformaltlod was aalaod lit" team Court Cleerrk'& Offfice. MI advised No "time was taken. I 1 y '-'1 July 22, 1480 CcaEtnucd 5• The Ccuacil reconsidersd the contract with the Lioas Club for the .peretiom of conceeeioas at Nick Park North. Assistant City Manager Ring Cole briefed the Council about the terra requested by the Lions Club. Cola recoaaseaded approval of the follovicg ehaagest (A) They wish to clarify a point under which they would not be responsible for vaodaliss at the facility. (B) They will pay the City of Demtom 50% of the net rather then 25S of the gross receipts. (This will team the total aroact received by the Lions CWh after costs, including tux, have been deducted.) (C) to sidition ti the pumaneat facility they, want the L eribility to use their mobil unit during tournaments and during mult!plo games. (This will better serve the public.) (D) The Lions Club wishes to delete the paasgraph requiring a performance Bond. (1) Other changes or additions limply clarify existing content and will not sisaifiesatly alter the egreamtot. Motion wed made by Btephaas, wooded by Sems7.ey to leapt the request of the Lions Club for changes of the contract and to autboriar the Mayer to sign sere. Motion carried. 6. The Council ednstdared approval of a contract with the Denton &%ulag Authority to administer the Cdemualty Developmeat Block Orant housing rehab. mutation prograe. Jeff Mayer briefed the Council, stating that the contract calla for a 11,075 seathly payment to DU to amatalster the program. This smut wan negotiated betwaea the beaten Sousing Authority Director and the City's Actiag Planamg sad Community Development Director. It to expected that moss 1100,000 in Comualty Development beck Orant fads will be available tar tehabilitatloo j of housing after the Septiabor 10, 19800 uontract data. All funds ire provided by the Vnited States Departasat of Sousing god Crtan Development (30), Notion wog made by Pell, edacaded by Sdpkins to approve the oostreat } with the Denton Sousing Authority to be adainiatorgd by the City Planning tad Comauatty Dewloprnat Departseat. Motion carried. 70 RfSOLVT10SSt (A) The Cduaeil oonsiderad a R4eAutld!1 authdrisiy tee Clty Manager to subalt a joint appliestiea tar a time extineiom for the Aubrey Reservoir Project. Water Cow"stae baM cep ovio~usly "tied" the liar for stati "N"nnd~e4 of connitr. dodos of the Aubrey Reeerwir proJadt to leptabar 1, 1980. Stale it apple" N at this afro that doedtrudttdn soy not stab by this data and say hot bt ow plated by the *uproot deadline at Beptesber It 1981, yrank Booth had prepared an applidall" to tnd Taed Water Cov dasioa for ad sa ninon des the punt% to Wa filed Jointly Vitt the City at balled, This applidatien rquaptd as atsa• s sioa of this tae for gauoderaet to septaber 1, 10826 sad the oapletien to September It 19". It is reeomen"d that tbs Council approve the following Resolution autbdrisiag the city Manager to file this spptfdat(aa with the city of balled , Rlfo~LC„tl0t WSRRBAS, tho City of De.,eda holds Paatt Rog. 1TO&A and 1319 authartsidg the add trnoticd of the V.S. Corps of UCtasirs' Aubrey Dam and Bdgdsveir ?"toad WR>1MM, the peraits require eooatruetion to doa add by Septaber It 1980 add to eespleted by September 1, 19811 add t July 22, 1980 ContizAod 4 1 9fff. w' an exttenstoa of time under the Resits is nau wry because the V.S. Corps of Engineers cannot commence or complete the Aubrey project with the time authorised in the permits; $09 TMMErORE, BE IT RESOLVYD BY TEE CITY COONCIL Or TEE CITY Cr DEwT09i That the City Xmmger of the City of Denton be and is hereby authorised to file vttb the Texas Deportment of Water ReseurcLS a joint application with the City of Dallas for LA extension of time to cacameace Lad romplete construction under Permit Nos. 1706-A and 1312. PASSED AND APPROVED on this 22nd day of July, 1980. AICEAAD 0. SMART, MATOR CITY Of DPNTON, TEXAS ATTEST: (s/ BROOES Now, CITY SECRETAAY 'Y) CITY Or DIXTOR, TEEAS ^f APPAOVED AS TO L20AL FORK W C. J. TAYLOR, it., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DMOS, TEYAS Q BY,, Notion vas tads by Stephens, wooded by Hopkins that the Eesolution be posed. On roll call vote Vela "aye", Henley "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye" Lad TQiaferro "are". Nation carried. (B) The follovlag Resolution approving tte sale of bonds by %be North Texas Nigher Education Authority vas presented: 1 19404yT201 VIEWS, the governing b'dr of the City of Denton, Tow, an the 5th day of July, LOT$, requestlag that certsla individuals proaeaa to re-or``aaits and re-establish a sea-profit corporation Pursuant M the Tax" Eon-Tor! t Carpar• Won Act, for the purpose of fur9hertag sduaational opportunities of tendents by providing !)ads for the aaquisittoa of student banal that sub hat bees Lccouplished, the eorporation being knave " the "North Ten" Nigher Education j Autborttr, Ina."i end 9NEAIAE, the North Tao Nigher Idnaattoa Authority, Us., has proceeded see the f drnlepasat of a pl" of doing bustaeee Lad it is nor Lpproprtate for this governing body to Lpprmve the echoes taken and the composition of the Board of Directors of the said Carporstioal sov, therefore, 83 ET MOVED BY TEE CITY CMCL, Or TNN CITY Or 11E91TON, TDLIE: M ~3a This governing body has been advised by the North TaU Nigher Iducatioa Autbority, Ens., that sub Corporettas apaa approval thereof by the goritaisg bodies e: the Cities of Dotcn M4 L-lingtan, Taare proposes to issw reveaw `ands is order to obtain finds to prtabase student loos noted vhich era .guaranteed under the provisions of the Nigher ad.uetton Act of 196! (Tublid tau 89-329), " weadeds " provided V Chapter 13 Lf the Tex" Iduestion Codel that such boa" vould be initisllr issued 4 "Sertee E" beads is the aggregate prtmtpal amount of 135,000,000 and tut such bands Wald be pyhbla fret and he aeeund by a Pledge of revenues derived fray at by reason of the ovoership of student lcea notes sad tsveetseat ISO" after deduatids of sunk Mesons" for operst Gas the lo" prog"A " say be speciftad ty the bend resolutiea or f trust Mature authorising or aeeurtag: sash bonds Led the pa"t ebesset. }E i We governing body hereby requests that the North Tex" Nigher Idueatias Auth- erity, lad., proceed vith the toonmee, sad delivery of such bdhrA for the i i , I Tiny 22, 1980 Continued r puroses afor"414, and Is this connection requests that the said Corporation axerpaL a the pavers eomorated Lad provided in section SLAT 6f tba Taxes Education Codas that such acs-profit corporation shall, is this connection, exercise such pavere for Lad an behalf of the City aad the State of Texas, u contemplated by Section SD.LT(e) at the Texas Education Code. SECII01i M. That the tailoring tuteumests or actions, to-vita (a) The Ry-Lams of the Corporation, u adopted by the Board of Directors (b) The Articles of Anaafteat to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporations (a) The Plan of Doing Bw laws of the Corporation, u adapted by tba Board of Directors (d) The election or designation of the eight Directors of the Corporatioal and (e) The a•sthortution of the Series S bonds of the said Corporation in the principal amount of f35.iM,0001 are hereby approved, PECTIOB IY. That the City of Denton, Taxes, agrees to accept cub that aq to conveyed to it by the Corporation vhan such funds Ara not eaeomberad and all bends of the Corporation are paid sad rattred, but Is na event does the City eg"a to assume say responsibility in CaAaaction with the Ldmlaistratica of tbll student leas programs it befog understood this responsibility to being usmed by the Corporation. M109 T. It is rudgmised by this geverning belly that the instrua,nte vtlab authorise the ieauuuO of bonds by tbd Canoratlon rill specifically state that the City of D4ated, Texas, is not obilgated to PLO' the prtadiplA of er int4rdet 06 the beads proposed to be issud by the corporation. Sothiag !a this reaalnilea stall be 40u%rned as u ladleatlon by the City of Donteas tau, t5st it will pay or prod" for the payuat at 4" obligations of the ILld Corporation Whether herret4for4 or hereafter laeurred, and is this connection, atteatiod 14 called to the Cdastitutioa at Texrj wherein it to provided %bat 4 City my lmar so iadebtedas44 without harlog b do provisdoae for Its pars"t, and the city elf Deatod bereby epacifteaily refused to set "Ida any presaat or tutus ' funds, usetL or moday tar the payawt at any tndebtedaesd or obllptioa of the Corporation. This Resolution shall be effective frog sad after He 1 paasge and approval. PUM AM APPBOM& this the 22nd day of Tuly, 1980. h/ t 0. , MAYOR CITY OF MOP", Tau ATfSSTW E Ory Of D1S, TI U O APPS0M AS TO U= POWs J , P. TAWS a. j CITY AM AM CITY OP DZlffOS, 'TS7tAS UL-Al . Ste", i July 22, 1,980 Continued 43 Nation van made by Hopkins, sicooded by Vela that the Ruolutioo be puled. On roll call rate Vela "qe", locsley "aye", Sopkice "eye", Stephane "aye" and Tallaferro "are". Xotlco carried. 6. Xotioo van made by Stephens, attended by Ropkins that the contract vith PLdy and Associates for construction of the XoXinney $treat Bridle to approved. Kottom carried. 9 The Council considered ratification of emergency purchase order 044305 U Xillard Basth and Company to replace the air oonditionige cogprissar at the Central Fire Station. I Millard Beath end Company recommends that the air conditioning compressor he replace' vith a rebuilt unit at a cost in the gieghborbOOd of $3,500. Nation vu made by Napkins, seconded by Beasley to approve ratification of emergency purchase order 046305 to replace the air coadltiocfng compressor at the Central lire Statioa. Notiom carried. unanimously. 10. The Cowell recessed into ftecuttve Saistom at 8134 p.m. to discuss 1"~ legal matters, real estate, personnel Lad board appointments. LO 11. Thu Council reconvened into Public Seestam at 11145 p.m. The following Resolution vas praeated: d B310LVTI01 NOW. TSltllt7'CRB, It IT MOLVgD IT Ta Cray COMM OP TRZ CrrY Of DENT011 The City Council continues to be deeply concerned vlth the current situation to the Police Departuat inn the City of Denton. The City Meager of the City Of Denton has ban revieving the situation sad he has aoottauausly kept this City t Connell advised of the progress Lad actiou Wee taken is this natter. II At this polat in time, the City Council vlshes to empress its confidence is the City Wager's handling of the matter. Vo are confident that the provision of the Charter of the City of Deat5o are beige eeaplied vith to story action togardine the Police problem to this date. Our major concern to the Well blind of the City, its eitildul sad its law enfotoemeat arm. Nee remain sensitive to your comments Lad apiniou add will des s"eyehiag legally wittim our powr to total" the situation as soon as possible and to Y orderly armor. Me Comeau Lad the administration are deeply aasoened about maltetou abartat" "Ism Lttone beige Guoulated U the City of O"tan and Me urge L11 I prr tes to be factual and intern the City lfanaeor at mirbetf of the City Cowen at afi• factual infanattoa you may have. The Council has directed the city wnseer to Project himself into the Mica I situation sad to seek a solution to the enistiag problems and report to the Cowell at act early date. TA addition the City Caunall aspreeses its regrets for the unruly ecaduat athlUted by sore of cur fallow ettluu tonight at the city Council Meeting. The matter before the City Council Mal of the highest impartnace to all "Margedi It should haw beta dealt with is a serious, aagaleattaus aid sincere faebiom rather thin is the ,motional mad beligareat mod what reigned alumni the diedusatas. MS1D ARM APPROTO on thin 22nd day of July, 1980. 06 Mmoi PRO TIM, Orn OP D0011 ATT11T1 T, CM MOM OTTY Of 11tMrl'01, MU i . r i •e~ M July 22, 1980 Coctinued Ap"Ovn As TO LVAL roax C. J. TAILOR, JR., CITY A4TOR.'+8Y CITY Or DR,=$, TLXAs By, is/ Motion vas aado pr Hoplti6S. Seconded tr st• hna that the seeolutioa pe puled. ft roll emit rote vela "aye", Stephens Repung "aI•".and Caltaferra, "Ara", Notioa canted. (Counoil Kanter foully Val Sot pruan% for Sction an the Resolution.) 4aetins adjournea at 11156 V.S. YOR 'ITS swWARY J { I ~I ~I I I t 1 j . 's , i { , I T , A5 City Council July 28, 1980 Emergency Meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas at 3%30 p.m., Monday, July 28, 1980 in the Conference Room of the City Manager's Office. PR$SENT: Mayor Pro Tem Taliaferro, Members Galley, Stephena, Pele, Hopkins and Hensley; City Manager Chris Hartung, City Attorney C.i J. Taylor.and Admn. Assistant Hill Angelo. ABSKiT: Mayor Stewart and City Secretary Brooks Holt. 1. The Council recessed into Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. 2. The Council reconvened into Public Session at 3:45 p.m.. Motion ryas made by Hopkins, seconded by Galley that the following i M statement be approved: "The Council is pleased that all parties in the Police situation have today reached an agreement of mutual benefit. The Council vill continue to monitor the Police situation." Motion carried unanimoualy. I Meeting adjourned at 3:52 p.m. MAYOR l - , 1111 CITY 51'Cl EI'ARY { i r I r 1 A i City of Denton Memorandum August 5, 1980 Agenda Item: Adoption of an ordinance regarding the petition of Mr. Joe Belew requesting annexation of approximately 6.2 acres of land located approximately 350 feet west of Interstate 35W beginning approximately 1,010 feet south of Zimmer Motor Vans, Summer : , Adoption of the enclosed ordinance will constitute final action regarding annexation of Wh{ property. i j Recommendation: i The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of annexing this tract. I Action Required: s Appropriate annexation procedures require adoption of the enclosed ordinance prior to holding the public hearing on permanent zoning for this tract. { Exhibits: Ordinance J ! f E1 ORDINANCE NO. • a AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT Of LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACT9IT TO THE CITY Of DENTON TEXAS BBING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTIkG OF APPROXIMATELY 4.222 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND 18ING SITUATED IN MR COUNTY OF DBNT•ON; STATE OF TEXAS AND BBING.IN THE 0. S. BREWSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 14 DENTON COUNTY TEXAS' CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL. "All DISTRICT PROPiRTY1 AND DECLARING AN EFFBCTIYB DATE. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was Introduced at a , regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texts, on the petition of Joe Belewl and NREAEAS, an opportunity was afforded, at 'a public hearing held for c +urpost on June 3t1910 for all interested persons to slat% 'two and present evidence bearing upon the u:nexation provide+, ,ais ordinance[ and WHER ;a3, phis ordinance has been published is full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearing$l NOW TTLERSFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HBRAY aRDAINS: i SICTION I. y That the her4inafter described tract of land be, and;the sue Is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, Lad the same Is made hereby a part of Baia City and the land, and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all 'the rights and privileges of other eltiaas of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject to end shall bear its prostate part of the taxes levied by the City, the tract of land hereby untied is described as follows, to-xltl All that certain tract or reel of land situated in the 0+ s. Brewster Surrey, Abs tact f4ftiont 34 Denton County, Texts, being 'a f, art of a certain calle6 3.~70 acts tract deeded yy 11. L ~odwin Trnatee to logo Trustee on the 16tth' day e} July ~g74 recorded is Volute 723 page 363 Deed Records of said i Com:~y and being meta fully described as fel~owes COWNIC1N0 At the northwest corner of said 610770 core tract[ TTLLLNCE south too W 30" east a distance of 114.00 Het to a faxes earner posts j 1.1431 ANNUAVON + Joe MIN s S I THENCE south 690 49, 06" east a distanc% of 135.51 test to the point of beginning; i , I THENCE south 190 491 00" east along the north boundary line Of said 61.770 acre tr4et a distance of 936.72 feet; THENCE south 210 Ole Ole' west a distance of 334.23 fiat; THENCE north 190 40' 00" wait a distance of 112.42 festT THENCE north 000 11, 00" east a distance of 310,33 feet to the point of beginning and eontsiaing 6.219 serea of land. SECTION 11, the above described property is - defeby classified as Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official soniag may of the City of Dentoa, Texas, which sap is hereby attended accordingly. SECTION lit. This ordinance shall be effective isseodlately upon its passage. PASSAD AND APPROVED this the day of , 1 A. D. 1910. NIQUID 0. 3T CITY Of DlNTOK, TZW ArMTi / f CITY OP D61~ON, T:xAS CAMOVIYATO LAW OAMMNMY j CITY aP Dl9Pl611, T . 6Yt i ' 1 I ~ t r :•1437 ANUUTION • Joe MAW • PAU TWO ~ ; l_.. • L :err . :a Y ~'J, II I Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation to the City Council Z-1437 August 5, 1980 Identity and Location; This is the petition of Mr, Joe Beiew requesting li ht industrial (L I} zoning classification on a tract totaling approximately 8.7 acres located immediately west of interstate 35W, beginning approximately 1,010 feet south of Zimmer Motor Vans. R_ ecort: ~ The site in this request is surrounded by vacant land, and is designated for light industrial use by the comprehensive plan, To serve the site with public facilities will require the installation of a lift station and extension of an 8° sewer line and 16 water line. There will be adequate capacity in the lines. The site will be served by the interstate 35W service road which is generally an ideal location insofar as access is concerned,' however in this particular case there is only one way to and from the site in that the service road ter- minates just south of this site. However, the Planning and Zoning Commission felt that this was not an insurmountable problem. Because of the surrounding vacant land, and the compatibility of the petition with the compprehensive plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, of Z-1432, (Motion to approve carried with 4 in favor, 0 in opposition, with 2 abstentions.) , i i 1 y r + r .F r 6 ~t2,,}99 + r a~" 'v "I ff g , 'i i 9 `fr.i• W Yx kIy Y YSaRr ~S S, rt .1. L .t r. y,1 '~.ft,~~~r~~' r°t, r+~ d It ~ L M t rYr. { t' Y ► %J±t a~t J~~~{'`t ~'3~ `f y s k d• ~ ! ate, ri e ' ~ ( fl ~ + }F y t p 1 ~ L n ~ € o:, L 7`t1 r fa J Y~r 9 -i ~ F, A e~ S _ t x Sa y x..+ r f+, 1 4~%. Y 9t 7,tyu l '~d 19 ' 9 , ti • 4°; a 9 ~.'I~"Y'~,,if~iT3~~lE~, w' n C .a ~ { E~t yt yf,. 1 r 1 'A .fit e r t'S ~E ,rf r R a 4' ~y 4xr ~:i K_-,. A ~ ) ,a'` 4~i'~~ rf r Y1~ t # kr ru o a ~ • r t 9 J J. t c / 71 r3 + ! 1 u , `Y 1 Y ' t 1 re , " r i n r, p r; ~ r . T y ✓ Y t ~ }y i~• 1 'r i ` f ♦ % k i ~ n r t l+ 7, r ! Y{, 1 Y +!1•'• ~ i ~ ~rr r'!I AI 'L 'x r h i.:' L d. 1 1 3 ♦ f! 9 1 I ~ li yl I+ t t r `1 , 91~ i s r • c ~x J r,tF I .:~Y1. r, If l( t'; P w i~ 4 j r~ 'Nl~~ i .4 1,:.A! r to ~HS 1 re ' ryr(t w~1 P, r 7` r r n+ * l..l yr Fr o 1.3r'".: ♦,~Nj,''kX`. 1. t, + JB+~ ` ia''~Yt r , 1 %7 Y e r xi Ll1'915 a~1"=+ + i. t 9 Y 1 Y ,d11 1"''i a rl r'i t i~1~P Y+• d+ r i •"~~1 L.v 9 Y \ 1 } "9a s• ~i e~ 7 ',L xA 9~ x' ! TM~ Ir `F`F ;.L% e '{~L a♦i A~1 R Y . ~ rr J 1 ti, rS a~rxy~ Y , Y , Z ~ ~ q'f ~<i.'i; ~~,1 t:~'+a i +t 1 . •l. : 74~".r 'n 7r 1 ~ r 0' '~.t r ~:^r rllk ~q Awn <`y'Ar h', 9 + ~1~ ~~7. ~1~• ' 9 ~jre i4 ~ 6 jt~ r Yn ~ ~~'?~1 +J Tlf .i F(;.~ ~'p: , +J yv t ~ 1 r ~n,Y . .t~r ~ 1 ♦f ryrt ( ~ f~ `J z~7~ fl ~ y'{~~,{~ ~~y r i~c ° 9 ~l" Iy i~ A ^y~ r l ~r~l ~e it it y w ~3 ,L.1F 7 r 17 w s RJ ,'4 ~t i lily Yl r~~ YI !!P i N r y? i ~wr • 1 1 R q' 4 1 r E f 1 . - 71r u i. k A +~y7 M + S Y ".4' 't , w. ~ I r'o n,t. . ! ♦ i N 4 C ~ J • tass ds'~F;°k A t N ~ r lit No. r 1, .e. ,r, y d~ r ' H' f! "yY R its 5 Y t'1, rTr~ 1 a o '~.1 9J' 9 y"t 'ACr . f ,.r'~ r 3, k X, x s Lz~7 a,~ <4 t, t ` '-yy r~,'e ` YI u 1 kliy~'i't 't G:' r d•F 10.+? • ` ,i( •~F'~, S 4 41~ • dt~ 5 t 14vy 7 e c S .y9 i' 7~b(~°'¢d r~ ~l}~Ttj11(~,.-,~ Y Irr .r ,f` INS t 9 ..'ri r~ th rY fr ! r'r 1~ y Yr t r1 1 1,7 .y,j !1 . + r'r tt ~ P ili, Y Y ~rk 1~ *~t~ ~~at.,r l it r rl ~i ,~'ri ly Y 1♦ fF r1 ,y a w ^r(qp 11` ty P nr !t ~ h1 i 1 ~~r~ 1;,~ ~ r 1 4h IT d MI 1~~'~~r. /1 7 ~ ' L ~ . ~ ~ Y rlf d7, Ian r ~ 1 E4. _ .r Y a,., x'N L e ! 1 At K + • ,Y p¢ l7 M ~f y~ - - !tX r ti'rfa~71 41{4cj4 tktir ''°~'p 9r rT„'+`s r 'c. r .11.. f "Owl F yf PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FOkNS Z-1437 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED James Mason 4007 Travis St. Dallas, Tx 75204 Tp Hall, Jr. Rt. 1 Box 102 Ponder, Tx i j t , r ~ I E( II i f i i . ...a. a.ti Yuw Mrw.~Y Yr w.r NV.rMti.M ...r..,ey,. .s Mas ear Ala 4AM -4~4,&AP4 it 11-1111 All i I j i WLxAf Lo ljljw:ujpf:4 A All Z. I E F I I .r. 1 3 t i ruA evn aaA lITI WUNCIL Case. No. -Z-1437 The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case in order that it ray make an informed decision on the zoning petition. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply fotm and raturn it to the following address by the date of the public hearing, City Planner Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 " If 20% or more of the property owners receiviLS this notice return a reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, those com- ments are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Council. If your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use this form to notify us concerning your position. If ou have questions partainint to the case, please calL the Planning Off~as at 566-8350. ` Please use BLACK ink only, since blue ink cannot be zero:ed. / REPLY 1 (V~ I am in favor of this zoning request. C ( ) i am opposed to this somas request. ~y ( ) I as undecided about this zoning requasWo My comments are as follows Signature Address 4oa S ..W'1S7eys phone 'Lt4 t 7 h nn~~+x rVH TM CITT COUNCIL Case. No'.~ The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition. ou de return its oethe fo allowing address bypthesdate mplfethete I City Planner Municipal Building 215 8asr McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 If 20% or ogre of the property owners receiving this notice return a rep'p form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply- form for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, those com- ments are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Council. If your opinion about the case has changed you are encouraged to use ~--1 this form to notify us concerning jour position. If you have qquestions pertaining to the case, please call 'the Planning Office at 36 -8350. Please use BLACK ink on17, sine* blue ink cannot be xeroxed. RMY I am In favor of this zoning request, } _ _ I =opposed to this toning ..,1igtiedt '4 . _ 00 I a . undeoided about this coning request, ` ff My comments are as followsc Y y i Signature -f '0001- Address ROY /0 . Phone Y Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission May 7, 1980 The regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was held on r May 7, 1980 at 5:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, PRESENT: Marilyn Gilchrist, Linnie McAdams, Robert LaForte, Andy Sidor, Bill Brady, Carol Busby. Staff members were: John Lavretta, Charles Watkins, Jeff Meyer and Sue Wigand. ABSENT: None. Linnie McAdams called the meeting to order. _ 1. Minutes: A. Approve the minutes of the April 16, 1980 meeting. The Commission amended the minutes as follows: Phil Smith's name was changed to Phil Philips. Motion was made by Marilyn Gilchrist and- seconded- by Robert LaForte to approve the minutes as amended. _ Motion carried unanimously. B. Approve the minutes of the April 3d, 1980 Study Seision; Motion was made by Robert LaForte and seconded by Andy Sidor to apptaVe the minutes. Motion carried unanimously II. Public Hearings: _At_„Z-1W . This is the petition of Mr. Joe 8e1ew requesting (1),a change of oning'from agricultural (A)) to light industrial (LI) " - ~•classification on a 2.4 acre parcel Nich is located along the we;t side of I.35W and beggins approximately 1010 feet south of Zimmer Motor Vansi and (t) annexation and light Industrial (LI) zoning classification on a -•••.........6,2 Acre ,tra t located approximately 350 feet west of I.35W immediately . " west of no, 1} above. .-...John Lavretta explained the zoning classifications in this case. No une.w" present to speak in favor of the request. "1P~bxe"iras'present to speak in opposition of the request. j „ John~Lavretta presented the staff recommendation. _.Uml..Baby- er.rtYed_pt this time, Comfsslon- discussed the case, ` -111 f 114(fy 10VI'ved 'at this time. Motion was made by Andy Sidor and seconded by Marilyn Gilchrist to approve . w _ t•143N *tlon carried with a vote of 4 - 0 (Brady and Busby abstained), Page 2 Minutes j i B. Z-1448. This is the petition of Mr. John Tysseland and Mr. Laurence Halsey requesting a change of zoning from agricultural (A) to light industrial (L1) classification on a tract totaling appproximately 6 acres. The parcel is located on the west side of Mayhi.ll Road beginning approximately 487 feet north of the intersection of Mayhill Road and E. McKinney Street. i Laurence Halsey, petitioner, representing Halsey Engifieering in Denton, spoke in favor of the request. He stated that he and Mr. Tysseland a ree to 1) clean up the property, 2) remove dilapidated structures, and 3~ continue sewer lines to end of his property line. Jim Oarby, current owner of the property, spoke in favor of the request. He stated that the property has a drainage problem and the property has become a dumpground. John Lavretta presented the staff recommendation which was denial. Darby spoke in rebuttal. The Commission discussed the case. Motion was made by Brady and seconded by Sidor to approve Z-1448. Motion carried with a vote of 4 - 2. C. Z-1449. This is the petition of Mr. James Nhitmer requesting e change of zoning from multi family (MF-1) to light industrial (Lt) classification on a one (1) acre tract located along the north side of University Drive approximately 1,015 feet west of Old North Road. James lihitmmq, petitioner, spoke in opposition to his request, stating that he wanted the Commission to deny the request. i Harvey Thompson spoke in opposition. Sheryl Fite$ spoke in opposition. Linda Blees spoke in opposition. i Fannie Belle Gaupp spoke in opposition. 3 The~Ca mission discussed the case. I~ y y-Motion was made by La Forte and seconded by Gilchrist to deny Z-1449. Motlon_sarried_Unanimously. M _A:.._~Q>3sidsir_the final plat of Sequoia Park Addition. ` Lhis aff~reenomnendsaapprovaall~withgtwoaconditionsocated and stated that d 4dimeter'bend in cut de sac should be 8 diameter bend 2 Planning and Community Development Deppartment needs a seperate " iriltNftht for the easement immediately south of the land being platted. { s Page 3 Minutes Motion was made by Busby and seconded ~y Brady to approve the final plat of Sequoia Park Addition with the two conditions mentioned by Charles Watkins. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consider quitclaim of a utility easement of Lot l, Thompson Addition. Motion was made by Andy Sidor and seconded by Bill Brady to quitclaim the utility easement of Lot 1, Thompson Addition, Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. !h J 1 . { i I I i , I i Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation to the City Council Z-1454 August 5, 1980 Identity and Location: Z-1454 This is the petition of Mr. E, W. Belcher requesting a change of zoning from office (0? to commercial) C) classification. The property is located along the north side of Dallas Drive approximate)y 89 feet west of Cook Street and begins immediately north of Simmons Street. The parcel is approximately .3 acres in size and is more particularly described as City lot 26, block 231. Background: In April, 1976 the site in this request along with the adjoining lot (lot 25, block 231) on the east was rezoned from single family (SF-7) to office (0) classification. Then in August, 1976, lot 26 of block 231, which fronts along Cook Street, was rezoned from office (0) to commercial (C) classification. Earlier this year a change of zoning from single family (SF-7) to commercial (C) classification on a 1.2 acre parcel located along the north side of Dallas Drive and south of Simmons Street was denied. Abutting residential property was the major reason for denial. f Reeort: The site in this request is undeveloped at the present time, trucks are often parked on the property. Surrounding land use includes vacant land immediately north and east of the site with strip commercial development along the west side of Dallas Drive: Vacant land is located on the south side of Simmons Street and single family houO ng is located along the east side of Cook Street, The roperty is located in tho Dallas Drive corridor E which is predominantly zoned commercial and developed with commercial uses, i Public facilities are available for extension to the site and there is ade~qquate capacity in the lines, Access to this property presents a problem in that Simmons Street forms i a "the intersection at a 300 angle into a major traffic artery (Dallas Drive). I i I k The Land Use Committee rated the general area which includes the adjacent' neighborhood as clearly not as good as it used to be, but relatively. stable, The Committee noted that this type of neighborhood needs special zoning protection. The Planning Commission considered these issues, along with the fact that this area is in the Community Development block Grant target area. However since the pp operty immediately east of this site is already zoned for commercial ~C) use the Panning and Win Commission felt this was a reasonable request and recommends approval of x•1454. IMotion to approve carried with 5 in favor and 1 opposed). , i i I IL, 4t t t . L 4 10 1! t♦ t~ C J/ • r / { 11 L r~,r 41 At 1A MIS ClJl • Y ~ I M 10, 7 I~ .ice • f ~ tl ~e ~ AIDA . Ilk r . r I ` n 'A . v 5~ rf~M..n~i lv ~t • rI J.sspl~i~Y"k `a r C F PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS Z-1454 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Mrs. Toro Floyd Carlphus Howard for 401 Simmons J. Simmons Estate Denton, Texas 76201 Simmons Street 6 Dallas Drive Denton, Texas 76201 i 117 I i i i i f . i 1 i 1 i 1 M ± I I - e ' r 116 9 AA JAJ JA14 110#01 N 11 A /f "Ufa fAJ a r fr rr / " el ' r } r ' j I! w 1' of h ~ i ' i rte;*...,. I qi I / 1 A.i, 1 7 1(L ~ 11 N -L)A It I i i q 11 Dt tail, i L. i 1 oh, . f Jfi.L.LJl.LhAU M l 4. & M Age, r 1 pl I W FTA& All MA f r-- v J, Aii . r{...'~r ...a~w. _ t i rur~ I 11 i 1 I I r f I I i k ~tp] 1 I • 3 I REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Case No. Z-1454 The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing. City Planner Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear- _ in and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if .they wish, If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City -Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning "Officr st7566-8350.'•- Please use BLACK ink only. REPLY _ _ ( ) I am in favor of this zoning request. .!•....I am opposed to this zoning request. , . _Y am undecided about this zoning request. _.._.._.-M._4owonts 'are aa- follows t Signature ~ et_ Address ~n Phone 1a-WR i i REPLY FOR THE PLA14NING AND ZONING COMMISSION Case No Z-1454 The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this case in order that they, may make a better informed recommendation to the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing. City Planner Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear- ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning Office at 566-8350. Please use BLACK ine only. REPLY l (x) I am in favor of this zoning request. OV, ( ) I am opposed to this zoning request. ( } I am undecided about this zoning request My comments are as fa11owscvj_~ j ` • 4 A&-ol , A.. %04 1A1 M& A A V olow A44 i • ~ r 444 i ignature rAddresIa r 1 m Planning and Zoning Commission July 2, 1980 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on July 2, 7980 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building. PRESENT: Dab Woodin, Robert LaForte, Linnie McAdams, Andy Sidor, Jack Miller, and Marilyn Gilchrist. Staff members present were: Jeff Meyer, Charles Watkins, Rick Sveh7a, Greg Edwards, and Susan Wigand. A8SENT: Carole Busby. Linne McAdams called the meeting to order. I. Swear in new members of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Brooks Holt swore in the two new members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Bob Woodin and Jack Miller. II. Minutes: A. Approve the minutes of the June 18, 1980 meeting. Motion was made by Andy Sidor and seconded by Linnie McAdams to approve the minutes of the June 18, 1980 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Approve the minutes of the June 25, 1980 study session. I Motion was made by Robert LaForte and seconded by Andy Sidor to approve the minutes of the June 25, 1980 study session. Motion carried unanimously. III. Public Hearings: " A. Z-1454. This is the petition of Mr. E. W, Belcher requesting a change of zoning from office (0) to commercial (C) classification, .-_.The..progerty.is located along the north side of Dallas Drive approxi mately 89 feet west of Cook Street and Kigins immediate) nort of f _.....tmmon;, Street. The parcel is approximately .3 acres In size and is more particularly described as City lot 26, block 231. Mr; Brad Filcher (E. W. Belcher's son) spoke in favor of the request. E_ He stated that he owns the two feces of property abutting on the easf and west (zoned commercial. The Commission discussed the case with Mr. Belcher. They discussed the - fence along Cook Street which is partially dismantled lhit he'viould take the fence down if the Commission so desiredlcher said .Ko one spoke-in opposition to the request. Char7es-Watkins presented the staff recww ndation, which was denial. Mr. Belcher spoke in rebuttal. The Commission discussed the case again with Mr. Belcher. f Foal Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission July 2, 1980 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on July 2, 1980 at 5:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building. PRESENT: Bob Woodin, Robert LaForte, Linnie McAdams, Andy Sidor, Jack Miller, and Marilyn Gilchrist. Staff members present were: Jeff Meyer, Charles Watkins, Rick Svehla, Greg Edwards, and Susan Wigand. ABSENT: Carole Busby. Linne McAdams called the meeting to order. I I. Swear in new members of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Brooks Holt swore in the two new members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Bob Woodin and Jack Miller. II. Minutes: A, Approve the minutes of the June 18, 1980 meeting. Motion was made by Andy Sidor and seconded by Linnie McAdams to approve the minutes of the June 18, 1980 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. B, Approve the minutes of the June 25, 1980 study session. E Motion was made by Robert LaForte and seconded by Andy Sidor to approve the minutes of the June 25, 1980 study session. Motion carried unanimously. i 111. Public Hearings: A. Z-1454. This is the petition of Mr. E. W. Belcher requesting a change of zoning from office (0) to commercial (C) classification. _ _1he_property_is located along the north side of Dallas Drive approxi mately 89 feet west of Cook Street and begins immediately north of _ ...S.im ons.Street. The parcel is approximately .3 acres in size and is more particularly described as City lot 261 block 231. P Brad Belcher (E. W. Belcher's son) spoke in favor of the request, He stated that he owns the two pieces of property abutting on the eases and west {:aped commercial). The Comm W 6n discussed the case with Mr. Belcher. They discussed the fence along Cook Street which is partially dismantled. Mr. Belcher said " '1fiat`hi-Would take the fence down if the Commission to desired. '-"*Ifo ore spoke'in opposition to the request. Ch'arres'Watklns presented the staff recommendation, which was denial, Mr. Belcher spoke in rebuttal. The Commission discussed the case again with Mr. Belcher. Page Two I Motion was made by Andy Sidor and seconded by Marilyn Gilchrist to approve Z-1454. Motion was approved by a vote of 5 - 1. B. Z-1455. This is the petition of Mr. Charles P. Mulkey r uesting a change of zoning from single family (SF-7) to general retalliGR) classi- fication on a tract approximately 8,538 square feet in size. The property is located along the east side of Cleveland Street beginning approximately 74.5 feet south of Eagle Orive. Charles Watkins explained the case. William Phillips, representing Mr. Mulkey, spoke in favor of the request. Mr. Mulkey spoke in favor of the request. No one spoke in opposition to the request. Charles Watkins presented the staff recommendation. Mr. Mulkey spoke in rebuttal. The Commission discussed the case. Marilyn Gilchrist left at this time. Motion was made by Robert LaForte and seconded by Linnie McAdams to approve Z-1455 as a planned development for general retail (GR) contingent upon approval of the site plan. Motion failed by a vote of 3 to 2. Motion was made by LaForte and seconded by Sidor to approve Z-1455 as requested. Motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. III. Considerations: I A. Consider quitclaim of a 16 foot utility easement along the rear of lots 7, 8, 96 10, and 11, Block A, Section One, Oakhill Addition. - - .-.Ckarles_W&t;lns stated that the staff recommended that this piece of property be quitclaimed. Motion was made by Sidor and seconded by LaForte to quitclaim the r------ - ~mner{~ ktion carried unanimously. :S~v~Si4gr. re-organization of the Planning and Zoning Commission. F as, made by Sidor and seconded by LaForte to table this item untfl afl commissioners were present. Motion carried unanimously. V.`Eonsider Policy Review. -'It was"time consensus of the Commission to table this item also. ad, 60he-d'&t 7:00 p.m. I i Y+b"Y Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation to the City Council Z-1455 August 5, 1980 Identity-and Location: Z-1455 This is the petition of Mr. Charles P. Mulkey requesting a change of zoning from single family (SF-7) to general retail (GR) classification on a tract approximately 81538 square feet to size. The property is located along the east side of Cleveland Street beginning approximately 74.5 feet south of Eagle Drive. { Background: The Planning and Zoning Commission and Cit Council approved a change of zoning from single family (SF-7) to general retail (GRI classification on a 1/2 acre tract adjacent to the parcel in this request on April 15. 1980. In August, 1979 the Planning and Zoning Commission denied a etition for a change of 1 zoning from single family (SF-7)to neighborhood service (NSg classification at the northeast corner of the intersection of Cleveland and Collins Street. The petitioner wanted to convert the building on the property into a studio for musicians. The proximity of residential housing was the most significant factor in the decision to deny the request. E Report: A single family house is located on the tract in this request. Surrounding land use includes single family housing located along the east side of Cleveland Street with an apartment building located at the southwest corner of Eagle Drive and Cleveland. Single family housing is also located along the west side of Cleveland Street south of the apartments. The property immediately north of the site is zoned general retail and is vacant at this time. Public facilities are available at the site and there is adequate capacity in the lines. a The proposed general retail zone will abut residential property on the south, This neighborhood is slightly declining and the area is In transition. At the present time most of the modest homes along Cleveland Street appear to meet City standards and four of the homes within 200 feet appear to be owner occupied. i If the site in this request is to be in conjunction with the car wash proposed for the adjacent property it could provide better access to the car wash. F Most members of the Land Use Planning Committee felt that slightly declining neigh- borhoods are particularly sensitive to zoning changes. There was also general agreement F that one way to stabilize these areas is for the public to reconfirm support for these areas in such ways as specifying the area as an area for special protection such as severe review of any zoning changes to higher uses. Most members of the committee also felt that the City should require detailed site plan controls for commercial type uses. ( soul 0,01 Page Two Z-1455 the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the issue of neighborhood preservation but felt that the retail use would have limited impact on this-adjoining neighborhood because it was located at the end of the street. The Commission also felt that the use of this property in conjunction within the existing retail site could provide better access to the site. For these reasons the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1455. (Motion to approve carried 4 to 1.) I I i I f s, EE K i i ^^^yyyyyy~~ i "If OA ir*- y F V' 4 piR y V ~ ~ 1 131!R ltd f~f - 10 N e~ . r -M~+ Iii'.,. ~ •Y1 ~ ~P~ ~ a!~ Y r~~. rll. haw .rt.>y'~ .~4'~r J• MW 41, A:WM1 ^'.«.+xI~rMW"-^"'-~^ypy;'~: IP.+MM"" ~+°Y "~,ki~'~' '~q~ ^h,• r sr .Kit. t 1 ITS h rl i 'I 1 I e t. IN p , r 1 I'll f rz*. rn ~~4~ 4 ~ '~.••IC..`• in IJAJ Y ~ .1` •4 'ri r Vs'..? , ~ ~StZ. iy~~4,~. K N,•'Np i: 1~ { , .r d r nl Fr• ,g ~ ~ ~rf ~ ~ iRt { i i s :r 4 ~ P, .;y'^:r .1 x}' , tv~ y { ~ r F~"' y ✓ y: ; ~d trk ~J 1 'J~~ + a ~tr~t 4'~`~Y 1, }e~, ~ "~N 'f'Y' -~~1 ,+y,4Ar~: •t t t ~`~y~aA'' '1 i~ ~"t-~ta~ ~}A~ V n1i~~t e t f • x J y E, .:t ~r~'~ ' S •J { , }{'p~ A3* ~ ~{7 ~ t ¢~P.+ w ? r~ XT'Pt•~ a at c r~F ` f' 01 ryN 2A ~:.~J ~,}}rK l~+! , fK,#,4 ! 4f R., , w EAGLE -or ~ ~~,,,1~ Kr ~ •,t Yet +1 f~ [[:47~" v y ~«.3' .7 '~`i eAH.. .fir. ~w. ,~~N; iij ';y 1• ~ ~1., ' . My i.. - 1 r a i45 'r yt zr•' ~ ~ '47 ~»~f 5 4 •.1 , 1 ~r~, i~~,~ f ! 1" L~,. yy r l ii e h~ ff its t A C ~ ` `•+A J fir` '1 t.j.`3~~'1 ♦ a1a'~'¢' PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS Ih Z-1455 I IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Mrs. Gerald E. Stockard Thelma Compt ri Winton P.O. Box 685 919 Clewelane, St, j Denton, Texas 76201 Oenton, jexa., 76201 r Vernon L. Phagan Rt. 1 Box,88K Whitesboro, Tx 76273 Mr. Mulkey 391g Hampton Rd. Denton, Tx 76201 , I I t• 4 = e Age It c ~t y i ~ i J OII 7 ~ 14 f Ice AAA. t 7 Pend J i U& IA NJ A . 1 J 7 C 1 i jCd 4A 16 3 Id Ad #4Wj) ~ ~ Smell/!. •l~Ir 7t •f~1 J 2 V -'LTeA Cal I* II}\ JAI i RAi; ft )19 2A I i 2 s J «-r Air}iw CAI P v } 6A a Ala ft 1A JAI . ' i r / f o rr i ~ z , s . I R ' I T ► r .coif, IVA 1) feel. d^, M44A. A. i f I i I , i E ' k f , t~ { rte. f Af t ...gas 1 . i REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL Case. No. Z-1455 The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this cast in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition. If you desire to exxppress an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to the i'ollowing address by the date of the public hearing. City Planner Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return a reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted s reply form forconsideration by tho Planning and Zoning Commission, those tout- meats are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Council. If your opinion about the case has changed you are encouraged to use -this form to notify us concerning your position, 1 If you h&ve uestions pertaining to the case, please call'the Planning Office at 566-83500 Please use BLACK ink only, since blue.ink cannot be xeroxed. REPLY (v') I am in favor of this zoning request. .I M opposed to this zonl ig. 'requait:' I ) I am undecided about this zoning request. My comments ars a= foliose I RECEIVED JUG ts$(f A Signature =-e~ Address Yo Phone 3~r~z 6 o } i e it- wi REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - Case No. Z-1455 r The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing, City Planner Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear- ing end we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if they wish, if 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return this reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four-fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning Office at 566-8350. f Please use BLACK ink only. II RECEIVED JUL 2 REPLY O I amp of this zoning request. ( ) I am opposed to this zoning request. ( ) I am undecided about this zoning rlquast. 1 C My comments are as follows, Alil! D ' t 0~2 7' u r©An ~ ~ £ C ~A_f lt:k 2 S' CYI tH4 SNi l ) G- C3 F -T ,.IPRo &Q ry l/uA y_ A 11 t r 1~1 G 6A3 A1 A 1.0~1C-, 1-149 Said- WW- 5;'i Orr 14,.T CAP Wj&&Aj . t Signature j 6)1 ti~ 1044-- 3 Address RT 41, - A-ox V40:11ko Phone W/j l 7'10s 620, ~ -Tx 70'703 t KtjeLY FUR THE CITY COUNCIL Case. No. Z-1455 55 The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition. If you itto desire the express folloowing address by this and return City Planner Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 if 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return a reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four.fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply form for consideration by the Plannin and Zoning Commission, those com- ments are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Council. your opinion to iaotify us the case concchanged you erning poai,ion.~a encouraged to use thi + If you have questions pertaining to the case, please call the Planning Office at 566-8350. I 'P ' j Pleass: use BLACK ink only, 0 since blua•.ink cannot be xeroxed. G REPLY t~ 0, OJG~ I am in favor of this zoning request. ( ) I as opposed to this zoning request. I am undecided about this zoning request. - My comments are as follows, 1 mom"" 0~ _.r Signature Address Phone NONSENSE 9N 1 r, S fy REPLY FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Case No. 1-1455 The Planning Commission would like to receive your comments on this case in order that they may make a better informed recommendation to the City Council. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing. City Planner Municipal Building 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 This reply form in no way affects your rights to attend the public hear- ing and we encourage all interested parties to attend and comment if they wish. If 20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return this reply form in oppposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four fifths (4/5) vote to approve it. If. you have questions pertaining to the case, please call thi Planning Office at 566-8350. E Please use BLACK ink only. i ' REPLY ( ) I am in favor of this zoning request. ay I am opposed to this zoning request. ? s { ( ) I am undecided about this zoning request. My„commente,.are as follows: & " V! . w_._ %_A~tL `rt,M.I" RlL t.!►t. ~....s.~ tJ[.~. 3►7.~ar d.4 Zai4- 'My~, A" `nom "ta. -#o Addreaa Q f 4 ~L•-~le.r..[ 3~~ Phone 1,4"0224a" 4a" :Z (a Ld,.. ' . Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation to the City Council Z-1456 August 5, 1980 Identity and Location: 2.1456_ This is the petition of Mr. David Dunning (representing the Henry S. Miller Co.)) requesting a change of zoning from two-family (2-F) to general retail (GR) classification on a tract approximately one 1) acre in size located approximately 800 feet southeast of the Intersection of Loop 288 and Inter- state 35E. Background: On April 14, 1979 the Henry S. Miller Co. petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission for a zoning change from agricultural (A) to general retail (GR) classification on a tract as Indicated on the attached zoning map. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the petition, however, the City Council denied the petition because of opposition expressed at their public hearing. The petitioner spoke with the person in opposition who apparently withdrew his opposition. Given the change, the Planning and Zoning Commission agreed to re-hear the case, and on July 11, 1979 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, but {tfe City Council once again denied the petition. On February 6, 1980, the Henry S. Miller Co. petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission for five (5) zoning changes on a tract approximately 84.2 I acres in size as follows: 1. Agricultural JAI to general retail (GR) .2. Agricultural A to two-family (2-F) r *3. Agricultural A to multi-family (MF-1) 4, Agricultural A to single family SF- 0 5. Agricultural A to single family ~SF-l6; E _ Mod05T to MF-R'by Planning 6 Zoning, modified to 2F by City Council. 3 i mete"s"and-bounds ro ert descrl tlon furnished to the Planning and Thenlty DevelopmentPDepartment with respect to the tract to be zoned for Commu ` eneril`retaiT use consisted of approximately 13.6 acres. However, the petitioner ggntonded to include an additional parcel, approxlmatel one (1) acre in size " VVW thie parcel'16" be "toned general retail, however the metes and bounds description included this one-acre parcel as a part of the parcel zoned for two- ""'BBCausa"of-thi; dtscre ancy, the petitioner now seeks general retail zoning i _ for the one acre parcel which was inadvertently zoned for two-family use. Report: i l The site in this request is surrounded by undeveloped land. x Page Three Z-1456 To serve the site with public facilities, a sewer line will need to be extended from the 24-inch line located east of Teasley Lane. A waterline will need to be extended from the Interstate 35E service road. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the expansion of the retail area will not significantly alter the traffic impact generated by the area already zoned for general retail use. In addition it is felt that the two- family zone on the west side of the site in this request will still serve as an adequate buffer between the retail use and the single family OF-16) zone to the west. For these reasons, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1456. (Motion to approve carried 5 - 0.) i i i i j . i ` MF-I b GR i % 1 ♦ L PD-S' 1 i i , . op • 00 1 A i J ` T ♦ ' P a ! 4♦♦♦ Z-1456 SF- le I • , ! 0 Ilili•~, I' ~ Ilr F Lam.. .w ♦ y 5F-14 I-T -r rT7= -17-n SF- , 10 U 1.. 100 PD A PD-113 Iw r.' I • - i PD, 20 t 5 1 ` 3 ,1 ~j~r J y ~ t SF•ro i E'9V1.X< PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS X Z-1456 . IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDEC,DED David Dunning 2001 Bryan Tower Dallas, Tx 15201 I j E I f Y 4 1.'V~IK - r1 ~ V i - i_CK'.y QT~ a' ?I! li k. V, Ll ~NOA Ir. r ~ J4 4A I I { ~ E i I I REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL Case. No. 2-1456 The Denton City Council would like to receive your convents on this case in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition. If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and return it to the following address by the date of the public hearing. ! J City Planner Municipal, Building 215 East MdKinney Denton, Texas 76201 U20% or more of the property owners receiving this notice return a reply form in opposition to the proposed change, the City Council must attain a four-fifths (415) vote to approve it. If you submitted a reply form for consideration by the Planningg and Zoning Commission, those com- ments arv a sufficient response and wl~11 be presented to the City Council;. If your opinion about the case has changed, you are encouraged to use- this form to notify us concerning your position. If you have questions pertaining to the case, pleas call'tha Planning Office at 565-8350. j Please use'BLACK ink only, since blue.:iik cannot be xeroxed. REPht F~ MFG r ( W r am is favor of thij zoning request. FO ' ( } I am opposed to this zoning request. ~G! ( ) I sm undecided about this zoning request. 0 My comments are as follows: i l 1101 Signature ow Address Phone 7Y.~'9v 7 I I f Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission July 16, 1980 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was held on July 16, 1980 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Bldg. PRESENT: Bob Woodin, Robert LaForte, Linnie McAdams, Carole Busby, and Andy Sidor. Staff members present were: Rick Svehla, Greg Edwards, Jeff Meyer, Charles Watkins, and Susan Wigand. ABSENT: Mrrilyn Gilchrist and Jack Miller. Chairperson Linnie McAdams called the meeting to order. 1. Public Hearings: A. Hold a public hearing on an ordinance amending Article 12-A paragraph (49) of the zoning ordinance of the City of Denton. Texas y adding to paragraph (49) article 12-A a new sub-paragraph (6.2) entitled property owned by the City of Denton, Texas known as j "Central Park° permitting the on-premise sale of beer and/or wine as authorized by the Alcoholic Beverage Code of the state of Texas. l Withdrawn. B. Z-1456. This is the petition of Mr. David Dunning (representing the Henr S. Miller Co.) requesting a change of zoning from two-family (2-F to general retail (GR) classification on a tract approximately one 1) acre in size located approximately 800 feet southeast of the intersection of Loop 28A and Interstate 35E. George Hopkins spoke in favor of the request. He explained that there was an error made in the survey and that is why Henry S, Miller Co. desires to rezone approximately one acre from two-family (2-F) to general retail (GR). l No one spoke in opposition to the request. ` Charles Watkins presented the staff recommendation. The Commission discussed the case. ~J Andyy Sidor stated that it appeared to him that this was only a tecFAcal pproblem and the intent of the development is the same, j therefore he moved to approve t-1456. The motion was seconded by Linnie McAdams and carried unanimously. ii. Considerations: j A. Approval of the final pltt of Wimbletcn Village Phase I11. Charles Watkins stated that this item was not ready for consideration. Motion was made by LaForte and seconded by Sidor to table this itaa. Motion carried unanimously. 3 ( Page Two B. Approval of the final replat of Brownwood Addition. M Charles Watkins presented the staff recommendation. Notion was made by Busby and seconded by LaForte to approtie the final repiet of the Brownwood Addition. Notion carried unanimously. C. Approval of the final plat of Sequoia Park Addition. Charles Watkins stated that the developer is putting in a new sewer line and the old sewer line will have to be abandoned at a later date. All that is needed is the $5.00 filing 'ee. Motion was made by Andy_.Sidor and seconded by B,b Woodin to approve the final plat of Sequoia Park Addition when the Planning and Community Devilopment Department gets the $5.00 filing fee. Motion carried unanimously. Linnie'McAdams spoke concerning the Capital Improvement Plan (C.I.P.) She said that the City Council responded favorably to the Plan and wanted more information on Bell Averue (!he actual cost and where exactly it world be located.) D. Policy Review 1. Processing of Quitclb ms Charles Watkins stated that thr-3+is no requirement in'the zoaing l ordinan^.e for the Plannir,g an6 oning Commission to make recommendations on quitc.'aims of utility easements. He mentioned that time is an important factor in that it costa the developer because he cannot build'untii the process is "mplete. If the Planning and Zoning Commission s+.opped considering quitclaims of utility easements then these quitclaim cases could go directly to the Utility Board and _ final action would be made by the City Council, Motion was made by S1do* and seconded by Woodin that the Planning and Zoning Commission no longer hear cases concerning quitclaims of _._.-utility easements. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Role of Negotiation in zoning cases. 1-_ The Commission discussed the role of negotiation in zoning cases with J the Planning 3 Community Development Staff. It was the consenous of } the.Commission that, as a general rule, they would vote on cases as i requested, However, the Commission also felt that this policy should 4ibe°flenible onough so that they could approve a lesser use Lr a planned . .._dsv_elopment when they thought it was needed. .3. Role of Staff in Public Hearings. Jeff Meyer stated that Charles Watkins would be presenting the staff recommendation I Page Three 4. Accuracy of Data Provided. The Commission discussed the three types of maps used (aerials, base maps, and toning maps, There was some confusion as to the accuracy of the view3raphs. Rick Svehla explained that the base maps showed / right of ways and not streets, The Commission also expressed a desire r to have updated aerials. Rick Svehla gave the Comm{-sion an estimate as to how much new aerials would cost. 5. Commission's Pleasure j The Commission talked about having a study done on the $150.00 filing fee for coning requests. E. Reorganization of Planning and Zoning Commission. Jeff Meyer.opened for nominations for Chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Carole Busby nominated Robert LeForte. Bob Woodin nominated Andy Sidor. Nominations ceased. i 3 The Commissi"n voted by secret ballot. Andy Sidor was elected Chairpersor if '-lie Plainirg and Zoning Commission. I Jeff Meyer opened for noriinations for Chairperson Pro Tom of the 1 Planning and Zoning Commission. Bob Woodin nominated Carole Busby. i Nominations ceased. Carole Busby was nominated Chairperson Pro V11 of the Planning and Zoning Commission. j Meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. 1 l i Ma eeerie~ I)CYC 4 DALLAS CORINTHIAN 1'r1CI rr CLUB } Northeast" n Shore of Ltwi-ville Like 1 a~ YY."ifGild'rlilfYslf~{:kZf113EK:OS4Xd7?il~. 1 ~ R>Jl~ixI~:Xt; P.O. Box 345, Little Elm, 1;::as 75068 i July 20, 1984 t ~ The Honorable Rlchard Stea•ort i j mayor of the Cit; of Denton t ~ Meu:bere of the City Council of Denton Penton, Texas Cer,_lement The Dallas Corinthian Yacht Club and other affecte3 groups and individuals plan to meet with the Dallas City Council to ask that I they review their present po'.icy of water withdrawal from City of { Dallas water supply takes. This policy has produced a disproportionate water withdrawal g that has favored lakes Ray Ilubb.,td and Tawakont and has penalited lakes Lewisville and Crarevine. Although the policy rationale appears to be economic, we feet that l there are several valid reasons for a more equitable wats-r withdrawal. I { kre ask that the Denton City Council pass a reenlution supporting our request to the Dallas City Council for a review of the present policy and a more equitable withdrawal of water. pp, I enclose a copy of the information mailed to the various groups 9 4. and individuals. vz Thank you. ; Sipcerely Maxey Mayo, Commodore Club Manager: Prule 1, Frisco, lexa+75222 (216)202.1481 Clubhouse phone: (211) 292.9113 %a t; 24 June 1980 WATER LEVEL STUDY REPORT 01 i Purpose !A The purpose of this study effrrt is to determine the causes, elements J and controls, that are influencing the water level of Lake Lewisville. ' This activity was initiated by the Dallas Corinthian Yacht Club Board ; out of concern for present and future condition of Lake Lewisville. i Activit March 18, 1980 - Mr. Dan Brock, Head -Operations Analysis for Dallas Water Utilities Reviewed water usage data of Dallas Water Sources over 1978 and 1979 period. April 291 19F0- Mr. Tom Taylor, n.rector - Dallas Water Utilities and Mr. Michael Tubbs, Deputy Director. Reviewed past operating history and present policy. Informed of equipment problems on East Siee plant that had impacted Lake Lewisville water 1EV by 2 ft. Adjustment to be made end of Hey to credit 'Lake Lewisville with 2 ft., once equipment problems are solved. Monthly contact with this department suggested and accepted. May 29, 1980 - Mr. Michael Tubbs Reviewed study report prepared by Forrest and Cotten on Lake Ray Hubbard, dated June 1979, Discussed equipment capabilities of East and West 1 Side tre!ment plants. Results I Data obtained from the various meetinggs shown in the activity is condensed and presented in the appendix, also included are copies of the water operating policies since 1975. The lake level is plotted in Figure i which shows the relationship between Lewisville and Ray Hubbard. The chart shows both lakes were low during the dry spell of 1978, and both reached the lowest point in December 1978. Water usage rate in 'Million Gallon/Day (MGDj is also shown, which points out that Lewisville was supplying 70 to 100 MGD while Hubbard was very low less than 10 MGD. Duriog the end of 19799 the the chart indicates that Lewisville is decreasing ti 0.5 ft. per month while Ray Hubbard remains near the conservation level, R i Ow"I i The rainfall it the %4ater shed, of course, effects this, but the city's water policy is a very big driver. A copy of the present water policy is attached herein which straigly favors Ray Hubbard, This policy restricts withdrawal when Hutbard is 3.5 ft below conservation level while allowing withdrawals from Lake Lewisville to 11 ft, below conser- vation level. This policy w,-.s influenced by a studyconducted by Forrest and Cotton, Consutling Engineers. This study was commissioned to determine operating strategics that would produce higher average water for Lake Ray hubbard. The operating strategies addressed were primary to the East Side Operation and did not affect the Nest Side (Lewisville and Grapevine) operation. This present policy appears to have two ob,iectivess 1. Furnish to Dallas Adequate water at economy rates. 2. Maintain Ray Hubbard water level near conservation level Conclusion One can study the facts or one can look at the water levels in the water supply system and recognize that there is no equality in water usage. The present policy does not pull down lakes equally but is based on economic and yields, except where Ray Hubbard is con-.erred. Laks Lewisville is gravity fed to the treatment plant and hence more desirable to use than other lakes requiring pumping. The city of Dallas has shown a concern over the recreational use of Ray Hubbard to the point, they are paying extra to pump water from lawakont. This East Side water policy is effective and working to maintain levels at both Hubbard and Tawakoni. The City of Dallas Water Department has been most helpful and cooperative in supplying data and helping this writer to understand and interpret the facts. They dgpear most understanding to our concern, but they are required to operate per policy. A ppoolicy could be constructed that would have equal pull-down to all the 1ake~ but with an increase in pumping cost. The increase in cost would defend on operating strategies and would require some study to determine w'iat impact would result. It is this writer's option that no long-term solution is available without a more equitable water policy. The authority to change the water policy exists with the Dallas City Council. 8, Et Shockley -2- lit FIGURE 1 ~0% Sr4 prV CITY eC 'DAMS WRZ1~A ANA~Yi!1 'DAt+I 34190 t 4 ' i r 5a1 4T ~ i ~ h , I 1~vBRA*b V ;,00e liJ y IL'•~1I7.1R, ri`PS ~r1. 1 1 _ ~ ° , . Y• Nip +L job ale 1 f I "••r`j I , jK. I i ~j y` I I i I L ~ ;'I .~P ~•4., Il ...~r.✓1 t„' ~,W Aid ~ I i i I I; , 7,', I err f ( H1 ! .r/1i *-W fhr foot" wji 'tip r),ll oil moo lkr V441 1, fqe r 1 rp+ N!o u/N ONN If.JV I Mb9 AW wa~~ or Yc j+ at H MaigrJuc Ilr,~ NAr,uat +W .wa) 4lto% IrK•+«~++I 11uilA,to ~l7rrMG) lop 'T A 604e0a 7Rs N6'~~ _~6'y , TABLE 11.1 RESERVOIR SYSTEM OPERATION GUIDELINES 1976 RESERVOIR GUIDELINES RESERVOIR WITHDRAWAL Lewisville a above 510 feet 79.8 mgd D; below 510 feet instructions to be issued as determined by Operations Director Gr- aoevtne e above 530 feet 68.0 n9d b belor 630 feet instructions to be issued as determined by Operations Director. R. aY Mubbard a) Grapevine ANove $30 feet minimum to meet system demand b) Grapevine below 630 feet or ~ instructions to be issued as Lewisville below 610 feet directed by Operations Director. i Tawakoni i a) Grapevine above 520 feet wlnlmn to meet system demand b) Grapevine below $30 feet or Instructions to be issued as Lewisville below $10 feet determined by Operations Director, C 1978 RESERVOIR GUIDELINES RESERVOIR ' 'WITAORAWAL Grapevine a above $29 feet 20 mod b from 521 to 529 feet 16 n9d I e , below 521 feet 8 npd Lewisville a above 500 feet 1S2.6 MO b from S02 - S09 feet 102.0 a+yd F t below 602 feet 58.1 mgd Ray Hubbard 1 If Lewisville above S09 feet Approximately 20.5 m9d b ° if towltville a5eve $02 feet Not to exceed 80 n9d c If Lewisville below $02 feet hot to exceed 55.7 e9d Tawakoni s)) If Lewisville above S09 feet 11 mgd b) if Lewisville above 602 feet 18 nqd c if Lewisville below 602 feet 91 r9d ~I I -6- I I i~ t i February 6, 1960 CEN OF DALLAS ro10. H. Stacha J Reservoir Guidelines Based on current reservoir conditions and keeping in mind that these gguidelines are flexible and that emergency, water quality, or maintenance requivements may dictate other operations, please operate the system at least cost within the following general guidelines= y LAKE GRAPEVINE Above elevation 524 - Considering external restraints, use as required, € Between elevation 529 and 522 - While between these limits, restrict to annual average of 16 MGD for-Dalles•, external restraints allowing, Below elevation 522 Restrict to.annual average of B 4GD for Dallas, external restraints allowing,', LAKE LEWISVILLE Above 510 - Considering external restraints, use as required, Between elevation 510 and S04'r1 While between these limits, restrict wit'- +al to 96 HGD annual average, external restraints allowing. Belo! elevation 504 - Restrict withdrawal to a 1GD annual average nez6:.,.ry to f supply system demands, after maximum utilization of Cast Side Water, external restraints allowing.• LAKE TAWAKONI Use as required, up to a'naxirx,m daily withdrawal of 100 KD, or maximum capacity of current pipeline, external r:ctraints;allowing. - LAKE HUBBARD ' Above elevation 433,5 - Considering external restraints,, use as ,-equired. ' Between elevation 433,5 and 432.0 - Take East Conpplax system needs as required, after raximizing the utilization of the TP&L TM o14 off-peak power option: Below elevation 432,0 - Restrict withdrawal to rinimum.daily HGD to supply the needs of the East Side Complex after Lake Tawakoni has been drafted to the maximum of the pipeline, external restraints allowing: axe, *AUT January 22, 1980 - Page 2 J. H. Stacha - Reservoir Guidelines These gu'delines are based on a three year annual average water demand of 244 MGD and a hydrological sequence from 1920-76. The above incorporates the Council Action of May I5, 1979. These guidelines will be revised and superceded, as conditions warrant. ~r 1. M: Rice 4 cd Attachments 3 C:uA: M. K. Tubbs' Fred Stone Roger Prota T. T. Taylor .11an Brock A. G. Ford i S S Yv~-...r..~_~a.r.«.. ,..w _._.....+r'..h r-i•bfY'YN.I~f~~-"r °4 CITY OF LEWISVILLE COUNCIL RESOLUTION HE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS: Soution 1, That the City Council of the City of Lewisville, Texas wishes to support the request to have the Dallas City Council review the?r present policy of water withdrawal from the City of Dallas water supply lakes. Section 2. That the residents of the City of Lewisville are faced with a water supply danger in the future if the lake continues to drop to a point below our pumping capability, and further the Recreational appeal has already been damaged to not only Lewisville residents but also the thousands of other users of the lake, i Section 3. That this Resolut!,on shall take effect from and after its final date of plAssage, and it is accordingly so ordered. i PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUN IL OF THE CITY OF LEWISVILLE, TEXAS, this c/o day o$`j„ A.D., 1480. a cTar`ence'.Myers Mayor t AT EST: 1 etty H rr s ~ • City Secretary ! APPROVED AS TO FORM: f nNeiman y - City Attorney ~ 1 ' 1 . . J. City of Denton Memorandum ADg4st:51 1980 To: Mayor Richard 0. Stewart and Council From: Jeff Mee bir or; Planning and Community Development Department Re: Portable Sign Ordinance Enforcement Procedures As a partial response to the City Council's concern for stricter enforcement of zoning ordinance violations, the Planning and Community Development Depart- ment has adopted a more vigorous enforcement policy regarding advertising sign use, particularly portable signs. According to the ordinance, portable advertising signs are permissable in Neighborhood Services, General Retail, Commercial, Central Business District, Light Industrial, and Heavy Industrial zones. Thus, they are.pot allowed in Agricultural, Single Family, Multi Family, Parking, or Office zones. , Within the permissable zones, there are further restrictions that apply to signs regarding height, size, deterioration, interference with traffic control, projection into the public right of way, and the use of a rotating beacon, beam, or flashing illumination resembling an emergency signal. I Further restricting the use of signs is the provision that "Bo sin shall be I located or erected within the re wired front a d, except a po e u gn no excee nge g ty square feet-in area w c may be erected on sites utilized by gasoline service stations, drive-in grocery or similar quick service retail establishments. j The front yard restrictions in effect, make nearly all signs, particularly portable advertising signs, in Denton,in violation of the ordinance. t The Planning and Community Development Department is prepared to enforce all { aspects of the ordinance. If the City Council wishes otherwise, the Department J is prepired to act accordingly. 1 ~ I i r I t IE , i City of Denton 1 Memorandum z July 30, 1980 Tot Jeff Meyer, Acting Director, Planning and Community Development Department From: Charles Watkins, Development. Review Planner Re: Zoning Enforcement Activities Twenty two cases involving zoning violations have been initiated from June 16, 1980 to the present6 Four (4) cases involved the operation of a business in /^1 a residential zoning district, one (1) involves an apartment in a single 1 family zone, seventeen (17 involved sigrr violations, three of which wort located ir, residential districts. E j ; i , i i i f i 3 City of Denton Memorandum f July 23, 1980 ! To: Jeff Meyer, Acting Director, Planning I Community Development Department i From: Charles Watkins, Development Review Planner Re: Sign Ordinance Violation at 501 Parkway A portable advertising sign was observed on the property at $01 Parkway on June 16, 1980. A review of the tax records showed that the property belonged to Mr. T. E. Uland of 1800 Cordell Street. My letter dated June 16, 10601 advised Mr. Uiand that the sign was in violatior, of the zoninp ordinance in that portable advertising signs are not permitted in residertial zoning districts, and allowed 10 days for removal of the sign. Mr. Ulard inquired as to the possibility of obtaining a variance. I advised Mr. Uiand both verbally and in writing that in my judgement a variance was not appropriate, that his alternatives were to eiVer re=zone his property to a classification which permitted portable advertising signs or petition the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council to amend the ordinance to permit portable advertising signs in multi family (MF•1) zoning districts. i Mr. Uland submitted a $160.00 fil mg fee and s%med a petition to amend the ordinance to permit portable advertising signs in multi family (MF-1) toning districts, however the petition was later withdrawn. Inasmuch as the sign had not been removed after th.) exppiration of the deddiine, I again wrote Mr. Uiand on July 2, 1980 giving him 48 hours to remove tie sign, Mr. Uiand removed the sign within this specified time period, Enclosures: A. Correspondence B. Sign Regulations i E E i _.gc) 1 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPFIONE (817) $66.8200 , I, 1 June 16, 1980 Mr. Tillmon E. Uland 1800 Cordell Street Denton, Texas ,76201 Re: Sign Ordinance Yiolatian Dear Mr. Uland: The Planning & Community Development Department has inspected your property at 501 and 503 Parkway. The portable advertising sign located at 501 and 503 Parkway is in violation of tho City of Denton zon ng ordinance. The property at 501'and 503 Parkway is zoned multi famil,/ (MF-1) classification; article 17 section C No. 11 of the zoning ordinance prohibits a portable advertising sign in-a residential zone. Please take the appropriate steps to remove the portable sign from your' property within In days after receipt of this letter. i Should you have any questions regarding this matter please zootact me at this office. Sincerely, E Charles S, Watkins Development Review Planner CW:sw DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i I June 24, 1980 I Mr. Charles S. Watkins Development Planner City of Denton Dear Mr. Watkins: Please be advised that I have talked to my attorney and he advised to ask for a variance regarding the sign. I would like a time extension till we have it chance to ask for the variance. Also, Charles', will it be necessary for us to go to the City Council or is this something a board can take care oft Respectively, T.E. Uland 1800 Cordell Denton, Texas 76201 1 i I i' I ! 1 r i ' i i i i ys- A - W ry MOWS I~ ~ 1 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL. BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 1 TELEPHONE (817) 5668100 h, ) F ji June 30, 1980 Mr. Tillmond E. Wand 1800 Cordell Street Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Sign Ordinance Violation Dear Mr, Wand., a variance of the sign ordinance prohibiting portable advertising signs in a residential zone is inappropriate according to our ordinance. 1 The appropriate procedure would be to petition the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council for an amendment to the zoning ordinance to permit portable advertising signs in multi family zoning districts, or have your property rezoned to neighborhood service, general retail, commerical, light industrial, or heavy industrial. Either of these alternatives will require a $150,00 filing fee and a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The portable advertising sign at 501 Parkway 1s in violation of Article 170 Section C, paragraph 11 of the zoning ordinance. For this reason we feel the sign should be removed pending your petition to amend the ordinance. Sincerely, C Charles 5. Nate Development Review Planner CN:sw DEPARTMENT Of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IIIAII~ ! .f CITY& DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE 017)566.9200 July 'l, 1980 Mr. T. E. Uland 1800 Cordell St, Denton, Texas 76201 Re% Sign Ordinance Violation Dear Mr. Uland; The Planning and Community Development Department is processing your petition for amendment of the zoning ordinance to permit portable advertising signs in multi family (MF-1) zoning districts. Inasmuch as the sign is ,in violation of the zoning ordinance until the nrdinance is amended the Planning and Community j Development Department must require the removal of the portable advertising sign from Sol and 503 Parkway within 48 hoars after receipt of this letter+ Sincerely, i { ~ ~~ei•46~+.. C ar es S. Watkins Development Review Planner CWt9w i i } k tk` DEPARTMENT OP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E r I Art, I DSNTON CODS Art, 7 f , A. LEGEND POR INTERPRETING 3CNEDULC Of USCI - KA/INATtI UK PIOMITTtO IM pIKRIOT INON7ATu. { KMONATII UIt NIOIIIIITtO IM IIITA,OT iNOIIATII. I Ci O"ONAT" UK MAY K APOk"90 Al IPt011Pq UK PIAMIf~ A010A 10. , i i r , 1 ..M Na x , li^4~II I i Art 4 DEHTON CODE Art, 7 ip a U wol i i ~ i aanneatxu u.n wr ww"m I M%wm ern «~w, n ,may w m am fm iau a ar.wa «ara.e.,wr w wr+w~►tia 1 sow NIL so R 21Z~ 1 V Art 7 APPENDLX A-ZONING Ask 7 ^ rr r s• w Y • w u Of r• ?lot Use hot w, wre•nrw . 6up J 1M~CUlTblli4, 1TH UW rww • 1 1 tLINC fit w • n•r a YM• rwr `wee►T • x►ram. raun wr•T•~I wrn" • • } r COMYtlICl~l TYH W[[ ~ Ygll'/IMrNYYI par C ~ W WIMJT1111 I J WOW rw r"m i ftA*Mft OW j F 1-1 O j O ~DY. Na so, frr. I i a: f 1 Art ib DENTON CODN Art 17 ~ B. For hotels, office bulldings, restaurants and dmilsr establishments, off-street loading facilities 64 be pro- ~ v1ded in accordance with the following schedule' Square Feet of j M{~ri+KU~n R14'd Grose Floor Area is Struolure Spot" or Bertk 0 to 100000 None 10,000 to 60,000 1 i 60,000 to 100,000 2 100,000 to 200,00 8 Each additional 208000 1 additions! Article 17. Sips regolatiaes. j A. The districts In wkkb the varianS types d dt= are permitted are Indicated by the schedule of nseg, Article 7 A through N. The following special provisions Shall apply to the oa lm type of dgna in the districts indicated s 1 , i e.or, tae a 1t7~ , 1 ~w~ B. Permanent-type sips. ryps sign Man Gam Area Zone Pwvtw/d g>~lr 5tonda de (1) N,ime plate a square feet AU reeideatW districts None No restriction All districts except None residential (2) Institutional so square fat Ait,rWdentialdisMats None No restriction All disMcts except None residential I (S) Apartment sin 50 square fat A ll districts permit. on. street trontap . tt apartments . (l) Budaese ,din No restriction except PermitW is 0, NS, None specified as hecdaafter p vid• 0119 C, CB, ti, Ml and ad for districts PD distelcta ~i (6) AdvertWns No restriction MMO Pelmittrd In C, CB, Now speoified FVTW , dls cts , M districts ad furor ein Li 1 - Aviefthural loo agwre teat Permitted in A, aR, 200 rag betwea does i a Cg, td, B7, and PD 1 u 1 I i I a ~r~p~r-t:w ate. F Type S{pn Mwb»um Ara Zone Pomated 5packg StaM"& IA (7) Red state dyn 19 Square foot AU residential districts One for each piattod rwidentlal lot or but sod for scewce, one for sub 200 fat of eh vot or hlahwar frontan Rod eetate sin No reetdction in at! dttricts excapt None ipeciffed (same--bat residential aom^esidoutial) (8) Construction 60 Square feet In all distrtcb Nose a sip (9) Der*pomt 200 square feet In sil districts in One par wiect, mone sip - "o-famly, two. for each 100 aura in family, sad multiple. pro}act family dietrtet, subject to approysi of bnllding inspector se. W'eetded in Article ISO (10} Garage aL t square foot in all dishich loOVA for 4mb plattod t or knot do..._ f (10-A vadda= - 72 quart feet NS, GR, C, CB, LI, M Now sped lied (pie) . dirtsiots i i i i I ; W" Art it APPENDIX B- UNINO Ark 11 [A D. In a PD, planned development district, the alp stsrid. aids shall be specified In the amending ordinance. E. No sign ahall be constructed to exceed the maximum i building height permitted in the spectfic district when the sign Is located, except In shopping centers or similar commev cial or office centers containing six (a) acres or more, pylon or major Identliication signs not to exceed seventy-five (76) feet In height may be erected when net back from the sido and rear property Una a distance equal to the height of the dgn. F. No sign shall be located or constructed so as to Interfere with or confuse the control of traCflc on the public strata and no sign shall use a rotating beacon, beam or flashing Bumin& Lion resembling an emergency signal. 0. Any nonconforming sign which is damaged or is deter- orated to a point when Its restoration cost exceeds fifty (60) par cent of Its replacement value ahall be removed. N. No sign shall be erected so as to project Into the public rightof-way of any street or der, except In the CB. central business district. Any projecting alga shall not extend out. ward from any building face late the public rig"-way for a distance of more than tea (10) feet or to within two (9) feet of the street curb, whichever is more restrictive. L No sign shall be located or arected within the required front yard, axcept a pole sign not exwsding sights (60) square fast. In area may be meted on sitea utilised by gasoline eerrW stations, drive-in grocery or similar quick se:,ice mail aatab• Ushmsnts. No such pole signs shall be located so tbat any portion of the alga encroacher Into the public right^d-W for a distance of more them two (s) foot from the pow 17 Una. I. No advertising sign structyre shall contain mesa than two alga panels facing In the sand direstlon. i IL No providons of this ordinance shall supersede or ro. O plan any other ordinance of tho City of Danten bavinr to do with the sip standards, materials or construction I exoapt, the wvldoaa of thin ""a" WW W" to the use of the vsar W 6ts~, t!w 41 !24? CJ o t i i , Art 11 DSNTVN CODC Axt i1 type of sips in the various districts and their size and Iota- ' tioa shall take precedence over all other ordinme4a, reanla- Lions and standarda. L. In the "7' offb•e 11.Itrict, no stun mounted at mand lavd shall exceed thirty-six %'(l squaro feet is area, and no pole sign shall exceed sixty kW) square feet In uba. (Ord. No. 71-K Pt. I, 11.M71) { f i f . i, I f F f I I Z CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOt tdayor & Council Members PROMS Hill Angelo, Administrative Assistant DATE: July 31, 1980 Appearance by Fayez S. to SUBJECTS Salaita has two The appearance before the Council by Mr. separate purposes. Accurding to a letter received by this office, Mr. Salaita will be leaving on a trip to Madaba, Jordan sometime in the near ful6ure and he wishes to know if the Council would desire to send any messages to the citizens of Madaba with him on his visit. In addition, Mr. Salaita would like to discuss a recent "assault on his life" by two residents of the City of t SolDenton. explains this case in detilxssistant City Attorney Bur IIII I~ 9A ngt o k HAtjm { E i { ~ j 1 i i i i; i c h iW L -}*t i CITY OF DENTON INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM s l y DATEt July 31, 1980 TOr C. J. Taylor, Jr., City Attorney FROMs Burt R. Solomons, Asst. City Attorney SUBJECTS Appearance by Fayez Salaita on City Council Agenda August 51 1980 It is my understanding that the above named person is scheduled 1 to appear before the City Council on August 5, 1980. Mr. DunkinaldDonuts, 305 was allegedly assaulted by two persons at the miscellaneous crime report was filed and Mr. Salaita indicated to f the 1 the next day that h Salatta wanteddid notlknow athes namesn of the suspects. Since Mc. suspects, I had one of the detectives pursue this and soon afterwerd had the nececiary .nformation for permitting charges to be filed. file assault Mr. ealaita was notified and I allowed him to 8 that one of charges against both persons although, I believe: the charges was somewhat weaker. Mr. Salaita was concerned f with recovering monetary damages against the suspects and I had to explain that this was only a Class C criminal proceeding and he would need to seek private legal counsel lr agdardind9 hpossible f civil. remedies against the two suspects, that our office does not handle such civil actions and, although hee asked, refused to recommend a particular attorney to him. appeared to be somewhat irritated that I could not recover his i money for him and indicated that he would go see an attorney. Mr. Salaita called me a couple of times a few days later, but I 1 was either out of the office or in meet sings.It is my office that he i understanding from the municipal court clerk t was quite upset about this and was somewhat rude to one of the clerk's on July 18, 1980 when she would not go and pull me out of a meeting. (I had been out of the office all morning at the EEO Seminar and did not have a chance to call him before our meeting that afternoon on answers to the interrogatories - o Branoh, et ai v. City.} a ea Y 3 5t ti 1 5~ t c R x^17? C.lJ.3Taylor, Jr. Y r•,' 1, 1980 E Ju Page Two k. I After the meeting I called him at work (TWU Biology department) y and he informed me that he had indeed visited with who refused to take his case. He wanted to know what -I could do about collecting his monetary, damages and I once again s explained the remedies available to him, including the possibility of going to small claims court with or without an attorney to help him. He was quite distraught that T ~rould not handle his case for him and that a private attorney was too expensive. The telephone conversation ended with my advising , him that. I would help him only with the charges filed in municipal court. This was the last time I spoke with him. The charges he filed are pending in the municipal court, copies of which are attached. BURT Re S L MO NS aRatjs 1 i 5 i ~ a ~qq 1 i K t ~ e 1'. l i IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXA'Sy s' `L _.T 1l •l. is Faycz_sainita , being duly sworn~,•'d~o state upon my oath that I have persostal knowledge, and I'ah'rga that r heretofore, and before the making and filing of this complaint',# on or about the 30tbday of June 04D 1980 in the City of Dentong. County of Denton, State bf exam, Rick Bryant, hereinafter called,defen. nt did~t then and there '-s within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, ia•venton County,atexask 'intentionally and knowingly threaten said complainant with immiaent bo ily `'1 Injury, i I I • a t against the peace and dignity of the state,! 4.,' 'F . Subscribed and sworn to before me by, Rick lgry~i a credible person, on this the 16th day of AsU. 19 80 6 er o a Municipal oure ; City of Denton, Texua 4 ~AYro n 1 l -IN THE NAME AND 11Y A11'11111111lTv w',, `I'11M 117.!111 1111 '10111111 j~~~ I{r~lll.~ 41411 ~ t~iu9h ll , x Fayr.s 5nlnltn`~ F'P- r~ r3 upon my oath thnL I lialvri j,r+i:NOO)I41 1+Hrr1110,41" i illy{ heretoioro, ts>v1 b~~/t+CJr lli~a iro.vM~i~~I xll+i t~IIN~ 1t Ili` J"~~`'~~~I~ on or ak4ait tf'4q firk~i4y +rl, !'lr, GI , f 1j is *i` rg~,~ ~A f.ha/,~ri /rril,~/ !rl JI''1liJrtlJ jrE Ylir ~s 9u_ „r.;.;t+f ~Y, 4 4Y Atl :lea - + t'.t. ,::a6li•i :d •wy: e,.~ M I.: n T, : ; f ; ~ a f .S`~ ='.1'~'"- ...7° iiF:~~F fAN3W!~~'-u e./.a ~`~f~~~.A to ! •/r f..' i i ' I 3 f J+ j / P irk r~,> k -IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS • y';~~~~ `M a prn I, Fa ez 5alaitn , being duly sworn,:to sita t t y~.r. upon my oath that I have personal knowledge, and I charge »that' • Ty.~' , r. M~ y4~~ heretofore, and before the making and filing of this complaint; on or about the 30th day of June A.D. 19 80 , in the City of Denton, County of Denton, State o£ Texar ' Yr+ ; 5.N reL tr... _ Butch CoFeland hereinafter called defendant + did w AzIl then and there within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, in Denton County, Texas, ietentionally and knowingly cause physical contact with said complainant by hit{;e h{m when the said defendant should have reasonably r believed that tti said complainant v)uld regard the contact as offensive. i ~r 1 T ! E t against the peace and dignity of the State., l ' Y~ t t om pant , Subsoribed and sworn to before me by 1'avrx saiatto + July 16th day of a credible person, on this the, A.U. 19...• y ez of t e fun o pa ourt ° City of Denton, Texas y ~r..l. A A t. NO. ~y. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING NAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS AS SANE WAS ADOPTED AS AN ArPENDIX TO THE CODE Old ANDI ASS CSAIDPN PE APPLIESF ' o CEA~'AINNPROPEA' y IMWN EASOAPPAOX= INATELY 8,713 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS OUT OF THE 0. S, BREWSTER SURVEY, AASTRACT Ad. 56, AS SRO" THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX NAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DArs. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERESY, ORDAIM SECTION . That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted January 140 1962, as an Appendix to the code of Ordltanees of the City of DotOn$ Texas under the provisions of Ordinance No. 60.1, be, and the sue is hereby amended as tollowst ` r All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed f from the Agricultural "A" District as shown on said tonic= Nap, and all provisions Of Ordinance No. 09.1 adopted the 14th day of January, 1960, as amended shall hetoaftar apply to said property as Light Industrial "L2" District In the same manner is other propartr located In the L1 ht Industrial "1,I1{ District 1 and more particularly described as followst All that certain treat or areal of land situated In to 0. S. Brewster Survdr, Abstract a. 56 Denton County Tuxes being a art of a eertaln (tailed bl.?f0 sere caner deeded ~y N. L. odwln, Trustee to Janes Nase*# Trustee on the 16th gay of . julyoC1974y inn Mims inaVolum fuully7diietibod as follows Records of CO MDSNCING at the northwest corner of said 61.770 acre traetl THENCE south ISO 15' Sol{ east a distance of 114.06 toot to a felled corner pat= THENCE south 090 401 00" east a distance of 135.51 flat to the point of bagianintl IL i THEMCE South loo 40t 00" east aloft eha a rth boundary lifts of sold 614710 sere tract a distance ~f 036.72 lM t THENCE south 220 Olt 02" west a distance at 334,11 feet[ THENCE north 100 40{ 0o" volt a distance of 112.42 footl ' TNlMCE north 000 11+ 00" oast a di+tance at 3tg.5 Meet to the point of bdgina aI and eontoinin1 6.219 acres a an , All that certain tract or areal of laud situated to th~1 pp. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract I{e. 16 Centel Co mttyF Taxa$* bsins a a winl Trustee ee Jas i P. X410AG Trustees trac In tkodllthyday et July, 1974 reeordsd Ia Volume 13 6 rage 36 Dead Records e! $aid County and total more fully dsseribsd to Bellewil BEGINNING at the netthadet corner of said 63.710 sere tract In the aorthwast right of way of Interstate Highway 1stp. r THENCE south 220 oil 02" west along the West tight of way at Interstate Highway 31V a distance of 514.21 teat t u trod plat 2.1437•JOR ISLEM-PAOI ONE . ~ a. x•„s ids, THENCE north 190 49' 00" vest a distance of SSO.00 feet; THENCE north 220 01' 00" east a distance of $34.23 feet to r. the north boundary line of said 61.770 acre treed THENCE south 190 49' 00" east along the north bounden line of said 61.770 acr: trset a distance of 350 00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 2.493 acres of land. SECTION It. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such Light Industrial "LI" District is in accordance with a cospprehensiva plan for the purpose of promoting the gensral welfare of the City of Denton, Texas and with reasonable considerations aeon other thin 0, for the character of the land and for its peculla• suitability or peculiar uses and with a view to couslderving the value of the homes and i buildings in the vicinity`i protecting human lives, and encouraging the most a propriats uses of land for the maxisum benefit to the City cf Denton and its citizens. UCTION II1. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect Immediately after its puseea and approval, the required public + bearings having heretofore been held by the Pl+nning and Loulal Commission and the City Council of the Clt~ of Dentens Taxies after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of , 1980. I , j CITY OF DlNTDN, TUS 1 ATTIM } CITY 0! DgN}ONo TUM APPROVED AS TO LIGAL FORMt 1 C. J. TAYLOR JR, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DiRM, Mi I lYt . 1.1431-JOI 81LEW-PA01 TWO p NO.~ AN ORDINANCZ AMZNDMO THE ZONING MAY Of nZ CITY CY DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODS OF ORNDINANCIS Or THE CITY Or DEIMN, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1 AND AS SAID MAY APPLIES TO LOT 26 BLOCK :10. 231 AS SHOWN THIS DINE ON TIM O-MCIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS. AND MORE PARTICULARLY MC111ED THEREINa AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' , . THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERESY ORDAINSa SECTION I. That the Zoning Hat of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 199, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City CiA of s Denton, is hereby Texas, amended a proovsiios of Ordinance No. 69.1, ribad property is hereby removed from be I All the h n einattsr dose the Office "0" District as sboaa on said Zoniag Map, and all provisions of Ordinanes No. 69.1, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969 as amended, shall hereaf•-+r apply to said pvopsrtY as Cosmsrcta~ 'C District in the same manner as other ppropperty lloeated in the commercial "C" District and more partieulArly dssoribed as follows All that certain tot treat or parcel of land situated to the City and County of Denton, Texas located an t.ne 'forth side of Dallas Drive and imudately west move past! ularj describe d as Loot 26. of Simmons 231. street, SECTION It. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby bads taht such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose c: promoting the moral welfare of the City of Denton, Torras, ch"actar ofsthebdistrict arn~Attlor'its peculiar suitability tor rvticpurlar usas, and witb a view to consevvial, the value of the build- 1 wi6'0[ land teLot r the lives, betatitto the ityeof most Dentddas p*ixse, and its cttiaens, t 1u~TION III. That this cedinanee shall be in full fps44 and all6ot ismodistoly after its passage and approvals the requiead public taaeins$ haviag i heretofore been held by the PLaniial aid toning Cooeaislign and the ` City Council of the City of Dented, Tosses attar giving dw notice thersof. PASSED AND APPROVED this ths_„ day of - - ' A.D. 1960, { OiTT Or DRM'TON, THAS ATTtgT r . GATT 51CUTAMLY 510054 0 CITY Or DiifoN, =13 ~I AFFROM a TO V" FORM ( C.J. TAYLOR,JR., CITY ATTORNEY o t f CITY Of DSNTON, TUM 1 ~ Z•1474 • Z X BRLCAYR - aY. t j . I F• ♦ .1~. ..wwweirl Vq~ r II , wxta>.~ V4 A1 \•RlF7A;Alai~lw•w~.rm......._r ~+ts• ;Z E L'~Gn t!]1I~ lnt ll~~j 1 nlnra,lAv Ediff WAS AMpTFr w~c t: ARE 8 1111 4L¢ e +t7T?~~ s.rn : r Orr. aeA~+A atx rr~'~X[ APPi;Ti< TL il9e1lfApr"lgtIr~vCE di•~ L87 I' +IAT 13 3Eit) Ti76 bet ak 1r t ht7' 117E !!rf M RlrfT? l 7 t 73145. ANY. aF±L+IRrAkA Rf`~AL 7Vx rEi? Ae 1TZ rF TVL DATE. , TNl ~YIiTI► 71 6F 71TF Ci1^ ~z 8A"}OA tEt<c iT!!R14Y AiiA1f!rr3, TAa t the tea EaC +trp of Jraa v 74, 1?f9 ►De ilt•. Z`~1LrR + >r so t1~ is rr, iP`a tt the radr . .e~Ra, RhbPCid ata "OntM, Terms tlhRN- t b~! .d[nat,~•try a , b, and rRe s ~a hR.rlr etlnd tr f~tl artveordfey" All r>!e aarrfna~r~; iraR 2l+e Siaplr.gnilr 'd~sr lbtd rr Cy IS l:r~plrv llap avid all ~ist. rt R.+V1i pr"I'sI M a• Y a~ t'l1ra~'~d ~:+f JdAm w, 1 a 3 4 rr `~tdt'n; >KO. d9-1 d 1rt tdht pry. iy as ttrut•a1 ~ti wi `f"t6 `lsr~l ~ R h LME t Ilt i et7var ~}~a LQ ~►iltrtir*11 11t0 tltkd more r tiw wr'2r lIZldt.1PaYat1 'titlt~titl~ii ,Ell "'rt 8r7tri11 tra.i +11111 stita:rt at to 2De x• F7tTi 41 lmt+, T.lra~, 2V 111111 a~ri t ttle~tc~N~MI ?kkd Z'litt tot p" ft" tir i r *44: F 04 Pitt, ~r, itY, lYYGi! h~llr f ' 'r rtaK 3t~sr7lnrr7ts Rt t tees, t t Cltvsla>st ~t rit2 It tM ►t1 •ait Etuci2ter~ 1~b4itE; 6 0N1ta 't talrjtib% tF 1R0,-t1s ~a reI b~ eRt! wt~t ► . tilvalaa4 Ste~Rt T1. ~+lt !a t Itl► p~t, I #Alt ~OOl3~R 1~►tt >sartit IAe , ~ lEi~t y~ ib sbA tiltUhl, two tm to 1 t}Iti1 p}w; toot), i e t at~lt~ yMittii }1 hot td 1 twk plt, 11 }~l ~7itatcr Aetth Ile j ` ~N I+*/ 11114 tbtltRlRt~ !4w ' 1111 } 1, 1 } I k!1 lk~ a,11r ~ e41 +t jt~j lMar ~tIL4~..~I• ! t t { J with t tr`t + iltil/llklk ~krillkgp t tyjk et 1 trn~rlt „e 1 lll,rw l~iiRl~t! t` kk M ~+ukp4l'1 1 kbtl~ ~ k r>tgqttiinlbkl eai~d tltieA, r`M1a nt 1 ! ! aOdtV~tT111Ra w11Mli0 to tot#f 11 11 111ki r 41'.. lit beon ie~lttt taett tilleeel'eltl~ltt ~ln 1e[ nthUd~tl~k}~ 4[ } 1e 1~l~fie to th City of D1llt1e all Itelellltl hd rdr ~1 #14 r.ttlr.CHAIILI! r. 1lULktlf~lAtlr lilVtl Wit. y .,yj, f u , ,n~ sr, i..k f W Pal{ r Jfpr e, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OP' DENTON i TEXAS AS SAME ORDININCES OFF THEMCIT OF DBNTO , TEXAS a1Y ORD NNANC1ENO . 49.1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS A PMT 01 LOTS 12 AND 13 BLOCK I OUT OF THE PAUL HAMILTON ADDITION AS SHOWN THIS DAT~ ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY OF DEN~IONo TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATB, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION 1. A. That the Zoning Nap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted January 14, 1969 to in Appendix to the Cods of Ordinances of the City of Den1an, Texas under the provistoae of Ordinance No. 69.1, be, and the some Is hereby amended as followsi All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed from the SLoSle-Famlly 119.7" District as shown on said Zonin ' day Map,oan January, 199a 6as oaedidn,sshallohereafter applytto said property as GGeneral Retail "GAO District In the same manner as, other property located in the General Retail "GAO District sad more particularly described as follows: All that certain tract or par al of land 1 1nB, and being .situated in the A. Hill Survey, Abstract No. 62% Denton County, Texas being a part of Lots It and 170 block b of Paul Hamilton Addition as shown by the Plat recorded in Volume 3464 Page 401, Dad Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found iron pipe on the east boundary line of ' Cleveland Stteet at the southwest corner of Lot I2, Block b of said Hamilton Additlonl , THENCE north 10 40' 0" east with the ast boundary line of Cleveland Street 74.3 set to a steel plal THENCE south BB0 401 SO" east 116.0 fat to a steel pint TNENCS South 10 3S' 29" west 72.65 feet to a steel pia at the f t southeast corner of Lot 13, Block 13 THENCE north 190 3S' 37" west 116.14 to th lace of begtnning and containing in all 61931 square test eo 1 ad, more or lees. i Etc it. That the city council of the City of Denton, Texan, hereby finds that Such General Retail "OR" District is !m accordance with A eo rehenelve plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas and with reasonable consideration, eon other things, for the character of the land and for Its peculiar Suitability of ppecnllar noes and with 4 view to eeasiderving -the rat" of tae heroes and buildings in the vicinity) protecting human lives, and r eauraging the most a proprlst! uses of land for the maximum s bislfit to the city of Benton ana its eltitena, ,-tt 2.1465-CHARLES P. NULKEY-PAOE ONE ' L:'~~,,'.ri.,,'A,.4{h~~,iL~'wr l.`t.l ,:F .k ~ '~`d::•'y •f,i'Yd•. ..al "r ffffff~~~~~ r , I a. WWI seer GN i i, That this ordinance shall be is full force anddd paaffect h!i~lcjie5ivtaj heriteI"'all an Ahold by he, pproval, the r a`iiad ioninc Cowilalon and the City C'J=Ci1 of the City of Denton# Texas, after SivinS due notice thereof, YASS20 AND APPROYBD this the ` day of 1010. C11y O ~DiMMs r ATTASTr f CITY Or DBNiONO 18113f89xAY APPROVW AS TO LICAL FORK: C. 1. TAYLOR JR, CtrY ATTORNBY u TY OF DiRN, T~XAS i or: r f i 1 j 2'"ll-CHM"S P, MUSSY•PACI T1fD ? Mli NO. 'J inti ~My, A `~r rw~lt; AN ORDINANCE AHENDiNG THE ZONING HAP OF THE CITY OF DEMON, TEXAS, AS SAM WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO TAB CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID NAP APPLIES TO APPROMATELY $6,018,19 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, AS SHOWN THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX HAP OF THE CITr OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREINI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the Zoning Hap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th dal of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Coda of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under provisions of Ordinance No. 69.1, be, and the Game is hereby amended as followss All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed from the Two-Family "2F" District as shown on said Zonist Hap, and all provisions of Ordinance No. 69-1, adopted the 14Th day of January, 1969 as amended, shall hereafter apply to said property as General, Retail "CR" District in the same manner as other property located in the General Ralail "GR" District and more particularly described ' as follows: All that certain lot tract or parcel of land situated in the City and County of Denton, Texas and being part of the J. HcOowan Survey Abstract No. 797 and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from James Franois Burnes, Estate to Dunning Development Co. Limited by Warranty Deed dated Jdne 16 1980 and recorded in Volume 1021, ?a 33a 131 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Teruo, and more parti- cularly described as followss BEOUMNG at the southeast corner of said tract, said yoint lying south 0008150" east ,184.93 feet from the south right-oZ-vay.lllne of interstate Highway 35-9; THENCE north 69'41'36" west along the south boundary line of said tract, a distance of 1053.23 fast to the southwest cornsi of said tract. THENCE north 0418137" vast aloa the vast bound"T tract a distance of 446.39 feet to the southerly nortthhwoest coorner, of said tract3 THEN CL south 98144137" east Alant the southerly north boundary of said tract, it distance of 75.23 feet to a point for a corner, same being an inner all corner of said tracts TIDINCE south 1026154" east a distance of 437.91 feet to a point for a corner THMC8 north 88.40'30" east a distance of 964.3 feet to a point for a corner in the east bounda y line of said treatI THENCE south 0.08'30" east along the "at boundary line of said tnct a distance of 34.93 feet to the place of beginning and containing 36,018.19 square feet of land more or less. SECTIOi N II. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Tarns hereby fiade that such change is in accordance vita a c~mprshsnslva plan for tha purpose of promoting the ganorel welfare of the City of Denton, Tame, ' and with reasonable consideration among other things f:+r the oharaoteq _ ~ , t1,7'. it ~ i 1a6 rt..ltA.r, r 1 ~+.~`.1''v~}.'~c.'~ti'~~/xr''%,.r •:~~•:tif`.J"ti `'.~53: ..'re.t~ %-•r~'rr i ~I RI 1 of the district and for its peculiar auitiabili or partienlar uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the 6uilding~, proteceiag human lives, and encouraging the molt appropriate user of land for the., maximum benefit to the Cty of Denton, exas, nd its citiaens. 'Ast this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immadiitsly after its pparesgb~a and approval, the required w io Coomisiiooaandgthe CityoCounciill of the Cittp of Denton. enie1 end niteer giving due notice thereof. ' A.D. FASSED AND APPROVED this the~day of CITY OT D68TCN, RAS ATTESTt CITY OP DWM' TEXAS APPROVED AS TO I.ECAL POW C.J. TAYLOR, JR. C17Y ATTORNEY CITY OT DENTON, 1 EYt 1 1 {1S1+~Y-..., Z't~~~~ •"g ~IILI.3' 1t+~ .mss .,,r.~. .f~' -"'~'•~"d~~~-1: u: aK'Y~ C ~'1~ to ~nNr.. I , l CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM r TOs Mayor 6 Council Members FROM= Bill Angelo, Administrative Assistant DATE: July 31, 1980 SUBJECTS Agenda Item 9A - Resolution Authorizing Grant Application As you know, the City of Denton has been investigating the possibility of developing and implementing load management techniques and remote meter reading capabilities for the City of Denton Electric Utility. It has come to our attention that grant funds are available for this r--;e of project through the 1 ! Department of Energy, In order to secure these grant fund, it is necessary that the City submit to the Department of Energy a ' grant application prior to August 15, 1980. At the present time it is impossible to supply the Council with all the necessary data pertaining to the grant application, however this information will be provided as soon as it becomes available. I have included for your information a segment of a recent 1 report which provides some description of the project and the benefits which it will produce for the City. f Bill gelo ; r BAejm i 3 1 { R d i a na I To enter into an agreement wmanagementcsystem. Tperacabletor two-way broadband energy 9 a has already indicated its intention to develop two-way security systems in the City of Denton. The same data processing equipment and in-house customer terminals used for security and alarm systems City technique and remote meter for loal management can be used to reading capabilities develop An automated broadband ,amble energy management system would provide the following benefits to the City: Remote meter reading required for implementation of time-of-day rates for electric customers. Customer load data which is critical to cost of service and rate design studies. Improved electric utility management and planning capabilities. Comprehensive electric consumption information for City officials and regulators. Method of developing electric load shedding capabilities by j ! direct control of air conditioners and water heaters during k system peak load periods. Instantaneous consumption and electric price information to electric customers t loaencourage energy conservation, particularly during pea Additional meter reading capabilities for water utility. Encourage thereby ominimi ins commercial l basic asubscriber rates, This program is consistent and supportive of current efforts by the City to promote the obiectives of the Public itn byegulatory i 3 policies Act of 1978. The current rate study undertaken the ity will include an implementation plan for elsctrio load management and f time-of-day rates for the City, Two-way broadband cable appears provide the most cost effective mechanism to implement both of these programs, because of its two-way capabilities, wide data transmission spectrum and extremely fast data transmission rate. i S R E S O L U T I O N i{t NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: The City Manager is hereby authorized to submit a grant application to the Department of Energy of the Federal i Government to be used, if approved, to make a study and/or develop an automated broadband cable energy management system for the City of Denton. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1980. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS { , ATTESTS , BROOKS HOLT, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS { APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS BY: F i { I r i :ITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TO: King Cole, Assistant City Manager FROM: Rick Miller, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Downtown Square Parking Enforcement DATE: July 24, 1980 Per your request, I have reviewed parking enforcement activities with Traffic Controller Harwell. Basically, his routine is to mark tires at approximately 8:30.9:00 a.m., log that marking, then return at approxi- mately 10:30-11:00 a.m. to write parking citations. This procedure is repeated in the afternoon. I have advised him to be as "high profile" as possible and to make a point to stop in the various businesses and listen to concerns. Harwell did point out that the key problem with parking on the Square is that the various employees in downtown businesses "play games" and use coffee and lunch breaks to move their cars from one space to another. There is nothing the Police Department can or should do about this problem. 11 In terms of Harwell being "on the job", I have reviewed the logs (attached). He has not been totally on-the-job every day because of funeral escorts, motor scooter broken down, and some logs have been misplaced. I have arranges! for him to have a place to store his log sheets so that we can better evaluate his activities. I have also asked officer Wayne Brown to 1 monitor him a little closer. I believe he has been doing the job required. I If I may answer any questions, please let me know. ± j Rick Hiller Chief of Police i ~..J 7 } i 1 k 7 1 i CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM., King Cole, Assistant City Manager DATE: July 30, 1980 DATE OF MEETING: August 50 1980 AGENDA TTEMs + Consider extending a contract with Sally Erdman for a Bird it Control Program for Denton. i SUFIMF.RY: The City of Denton and Texas Woman's University entered into a contract with Ms. Sally Erdman last year to operate a Bird Control Program in Denton, The purpose of thin, program is to keep birds from roostinq in residential noighborhoods and to conduct academic research into the birds habits so that we might better control their actions. To date the program has been successful in preventing any permanent roosts from developing in Denton. This contract expires on August 31, 1980 and the.Council needs to consider extending the contract for an additional year, I have talked with Dr. Huey of TWU and she said it is TWU's intention to extend their contract for another year, FISCAL_ SUMMARY: The budget under the existing program is as followas J 9 h j 3 CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Council Members FROMt Ring Cole, Assistant City Manager DATEt July 30, 1980 DATE OF MEETING, August 50 1980 AGENDA TTEM t i L Consider extending a contract with Sally Erdman for a Bird Control Program for Denton. SUMMARY, k The City of Denton and Texas Woman's University entered IE Into a contract with Ms. Sally Erdman last year to operate a Bird Control Program in Denton. The purpose of this program is to keep birds from roostinq in residential neighborhoods and to conduct academic research into the birds habits so that we might better control their actions. To date the program has been successful in preventing any permanent roosts from developing in Denton. This contract expires on August 31, 1980 and the Council needs to consider extending the contract for an additional year. I have talked with Dr. Huey of TWU and she said It Is E TWU s intention to extend their contract for another year. FISCAL SUMMARY. The budget under the existing program is as follows, r i r, August 41 1980 Agenda Memo Page Two $ 61000.00 Consultant fee to Ms. Sally Erdman ($500 per month) 1,944.00 Costs for Clow Gun shooters 250.00 Travel Expenses i 250.00 Miscellaneous Expenses 3 000.00 Clow Gun Ammunition 1 , 4 D TOTAL PROGRAM STAFF RECD V ENDATIONs it is the staff recommendation that the program be continued for another year. ALTERNATIVES' i In the past we have mobilized City employees and paid them time and a half to operate the bird eradication program. We would have to continue this if the contract is not exteno~ed. Based on past experience, the contract program is less expensive and more effective than utilizing City employees. s , } ( ACTION REQUIRED' l Minute order extending the contract through August 31, 1981. ZXHtBFTSs 1. Contract 11. Monthly Performance Reports from Ms. Erdman i J, . K ng o e 3 s I THE STATE OF TEXAS A6AEEMENT FOR SERVICES AS COUNTY OF DENTON J INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Agreement made thIsZj~yday of September, 1979, between the .as"3 City of Denton, Texas, a Home Rills Municipal Corporation', (here inafter referred to as 'City'), acting by and through itl City, Council, and Sally S. Erdman, 302 Taxes Street, Denton, Texas 76201 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ornithologist');+r" RECITALS City desires and finds it necessary to remove and/or prevent the presence of certain birds in the City of Denton, Texas for health and other legitimate reasons. The ornithologist Is an expert in the area of such birds and bird damage control snd is a resident in the State of Texas. THEREFORE, City hereby engages the services of the ornithologist as an independent contractor consultant, and in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the l parties agree as follows. TEAM 1. This agreement shalt be for a period of one ,(1) year commencing on September 1, 1979, and shall continue in effect through August 31, 1980, unless it has been previously terminated by mutual assent of the parties. SE0.YICE5 ( I 2. The ornithologist will provide professional services to control W manage the bird population in the City of Denton, will conduct academic research to try and gala a better I understanding of :ne birds and their migratory habits, and wi11 handle special assignments directly or indirectly relating ( thereto as assigned by the City. i USE Of ADENTS OA ASSISTANTS 3. To the extent reasonably necessary to enable the , ornithologist to perform her duties hereunder, the ornithologist is authorized to engage the services of any agents or Assistants which she ■ay deem proper. However, it is agreed that the ornithologist Is ao independent contractor and that any such } P i^w • WWI she may employ or engage shall not be employees -directly + or indirectly of City, it Is further agreed .that the ornithologist and not the City will have control and direction of any such agents or assistants. The cost of the services' Of such ' agents or assistants stall be paid and born by the ornithologist.' EQUIPMENT 4. Reasonable equipment such as Clow guns and ammunition therefor will be provided to the ornithologist by City. FEE S. For services to be rendered under tlis agreement, the ornithologist shall be entitled to a fee of Five Hundred Dollars (1500.00) oer month for twelve (12) months. Payments will be made it the and of each month except that the payment for the r , first two months will be made at the end of October, 1979, In addition to the above fee, reimbursement will be mile for the expense of hiring agents and assistants, computing the reimbursement at no more than minimum wage and with a maximum I • allowed for reimbursement for the twelve month perisd of One { - Thousand Nine Hundred forty-Four Dollars (11,944.00). DEVOTION OF TIME 6. The ornithologist shall devote fifty percent (509) of t each working day to the performance of her duties under this agreement. j j OTHER _ENPENSES i 7. It Is agreed that up to Two Hundred Fifty Dollars (1250.00( in travel expenses and : to Two Hundred Fifty Ocllers (1250.00) in miscellaneous expenses will be provided to the j ornithologist. This will be on a reimbursement basis after having received a written accounting with vouchers for each I i expense for which reimbursement '4 requested. I &I6NMENT 0. Neither this agreement nor any duties or obilgations hereunde, shall be assignable by the ornithologist without .tha 1 prior written consent of City. In the front of an assignment by City to which the ornithologist hat consented, the assignee or k i ) 1 t R his legal representative SW 1 agree in writing with, City to personally assume, perform, and be bound by the covenants, obligations, and agreements Contained herein. r}~ INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 9. it 1s the intent and purpose of both parties to thiys agreement that the ornithologist sha11 be an inlependent contractor and not an employee of City under this Agreement, and , . the ornithologist shall be responsible for any claims arising *I+,.: from any act or omission of the ornithologist or her agen1l. w ti, SUCCESSOAS AND ASSIGNS } 10. Subject to the provision regarding assignment, this. ty! agreement shall be binding on the heirs, executors, a? administrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns of ' tht respective parties. AffNOMENT 11. This agreement may be amended by the mutual agreement of the parties hereto in a writing to be attached to and i incorporated into this agreement. EAECUTEO on the day and year first above written in Denton, Texas. + CITY Of OENTON, T S I 8Y: CITY Of OtNTON, TEXAS ATTE ON OWS WCr'TTTT-TM ITARY i CITY OF 0 ENT08, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEC L FORM: ~y I I i ATTORNEY, CITY U DENTON. TI XAS ORNiTHOLCOIST c 60 lw-~~ l 1 y d R , k ~Ir~l TO Nr. Kin solo, A.s31st~nt Oity ~.anaSer, i~~ntr.u, FFI(i,; 'ally :Hman, orni th. do_ 1 ; tit co r:ul tart to TXJ 'r' 1, Control of url~'~n blackbinl ruont,. 6 August V'11 Denton, Te>-~.s has boon tha 31te of eummering blackbird roosts for many years. The city staff has dealt with the en:>uing pr)bleme as best as they wore ablo, using the man;ower available within the ranks of city personnel. Since it now appears that these efforts dust be repeated every summrr as well as the winter (the large roost on the Texas 'loran's University campus - Nov-Feb. '78-179), it would be prudent for the City of Fenton to establish a year-round position of Bird Control Officer. Tha effective control of roosts demands oarly detection of the movements of large numbers of births into an --ea. It is then that a well-planned and executed roost dispersal operation is moat like)y to be successful. ;:unieipalities in the country which have e,lopted this approach shave managed their bind problems far more economically and with far lens time wasted when they have granted the authority to eomeone qualified and , epared to take action IrrAediately. The Officer would work in coor,oration with the iJ.S.Fish and Wildlife Service division of Bird Damcve Control, thus both receiving as well as contributing information on a national basis. It must be noted rowevor, that current methods of rcost dispersal DG NOT ELIItiINATE the problems assoolatcd with roosts. TMy merely scatter them, thus making them less objectionable. There is no lo..p-term solution available at this point in time. It is t the belief of tho United Statue Fish and Wildlife that those large groupo of birds should be moved into areas whore they will not constitute a problem fcr *he people below. The methods currently being used involve dispersal, re-location and harxasament of the birds plus altering potential roost areas making ':hem undesirable as roosting ' sites. As ornithological consultant to Texas Wonan's University, I am aubnitting this proposal that a city-wide program be set up under my direct supervision. A successful control k program demands these essential cumponente! i i i 1. A k,towledgeable Individual to plan, organize and carry out the control program. i r 2. Fublie awarenssa and acceptance of this program, This point would require the cooperatiun of our local nests media, Financial support from either the City of Denton or TWU, depending on the rite of tho roost. { 4. The backup support of the local law enforcement bodles should individual problems arise. Since Dentor and Texas Woman's University have served as hosts for these huge flocks K of birds, we are in the unique position of masking valuable contributions to the ultimate solution of bind vs, man conflicts as they relate to urban roosts, This is possiblo since we now have direct contact with the bird damage control experts dealing with thin problem at the U,S,F.W4 Fedox•al Aosearch Center in Denver. By addressing our local problems w3 will be able to add to the growing body of knowledge nationally. ~ i 3 n-xs+ar ~/1..Tl~i Kiik Cole, A,~:^itant City ianaF.cr, ik:nton, '.bxas s :ally rdr.an, o-r:lthologlcal conrUltxr.t to T.tU t' i C•Ehr': R>a Contrul of urlan ble:ckbird roosts 6 Auguat 1979 lroposed budget neadrA to handle an effective roost control vroaram i 20 shooters at minimum aourly wage for 2 hrs,nightly during campaign r 20 x 2x$2.85 114.00 FFe x 6 days for ave 'e dispersal time of roost 684.00 labor* It is possible that velru jrs from the inflicted roost area might be used here provided they veeive the proper training etc, beforehand 20 additional clowgur,n at $16.00 ea. 320,00 I 100 rnds shells/person/night at 100 rnd $200.00/night x 6 nights 1200.00 Consultant's fee $800,00/mo. 9,600.OO/yr. i C1erk/Secretary-for record keeping, complaint receiving etc. } Travel-national meetings 500.00 1 { Nbiio relation materials, office supplies s paper,duplication and distribution of information to all oititens in roost E rrea Public relation information (photographs, visual aide, oto,) 200.00 1 The major e.rwnse are the shells and Z would anticipate that more than i weekly session will be necessary to disrupt and harass the birds enough td make it into the fall migratory season which will begin in late September or early Ootober, so additional supplies of shells should be on hand to deal with a following up operatic:i to handle this. { ~ea.A~_; l~h fduttj I ldar/, e ~ (Ka~q i.vfet~s-a d*VJ t~ rn+ 4 K?f0""4) 0 0 0 , t t ] 11 A, A'.T.aygq y lIp ll 'r~J I 1 Tot 1r. 61n3 Cole,A!•zlstant CLty 1.3na'er City of Denton, TQY.as Prom, Ise. Sally G. i:rlm n, ~rnithclogieal Con3ultant F'c, ,ontrol of ;rtan Alm ckbitd Roosts July 30, 19?9 The control of urban bird roosts Is a complex problem end r,ne that exists nationwide. 4owe_ver with proper management and direction, successful control prograrrs have been and are leing carried out. f U43. Fish and VI ldlife Service lird Damage Control officials have developed a variety of teaziques which have been used successfully in roost dispersal. Thoy have been involved on a national lasis dealing with just nuch problems as we have here in Denton. I have just returned from conferring with those actively working in this field at the Denver Federal wildlife research facilities and found the meeting highly informative and beneficial It should be noted here that the "blackbirds" in question for the most part are protected by federal and international law, are generally beneficial in controlling insects and weed seeds and do not constitute a nuisance until their droppings begin to accumulate in the roost area. Due to the above characteristics, it is felt that the best control of urban bird roosts is to move them to areas where they will not constitute a problem. For the past several summers Denton has hosted summer roosts, while this past winter of 1978-79, a roost was established on the TWU campus and dispersed in early Farch. I It would appear that the birds are hero to etay regardless of the season, therefore it would be prudent of Denton to establish a permanent position of Bird Control Officer .(hose 'duty would be the prevention of blackbird roosts in populated areas. Effective control of roosts demands ear detection of the movements of large numbers of birds into an area. It Is then 3 that a well-planned and ex.eated roost dispersal operation is most likely to be successful Some runicipalities in our cd&try have adrnted this approach and have dealt successfully in y its solution by granting authority in a Bird Control Officer. The officer would have the interest, background and experience necessary to prevent flofcke from becoming a nuisance. The officer would also work in cooperation with the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service division of Bird Damage Control, thus both receiving as well as oontribiting information on a country- wide basis. Cur community would become another link in the chain which is being forged across the United States as bird ve.man conflicts are resolved. R l i 5 I i +xM TFXAS NVOJfAN'S UNIVFIISFTY rW. W6rl, rwu STAT- Dawar,w. TIMAe "04 January 31 19pA / 1 ner.rrW" or OWL=, Mr. King Cole city mr,ager's Office Denton, Texas 76201 Activity ret Blackbird Control in January 1930. t At the request of Mr. Deberry and Ys. Schmitz of Jack Schmitz k Sons Funeral Home, 1 spent a week working there to discourage blackbirds from using their magnolia trees Sn the front of the establishment. The steps, railings and ground cover were smeared by several weeks' accumulation of droppings-Daily hosing and cleaning had been necessary to keep the front entry oleaned up from the night before. t Three evenings were spent using the taped distress calls, occasionally reinforced with loud, shot-like noises. There were several hundred Starling and Cowbirds with ter a few Grackle plus english sparrows using this roost. It was noted that even itreea t it was dark that birds were moving into the roost. The floudiit front yard and i were acting as a beacon allowing the birds to enter the roost, when normally they would have been settled for the night. The sound treatment was effective in moving the Llaokbirds but did not affect the sparrows. I suggested the followings 1. Thin and trip the 2 magnolia trees. Diagrams supplied to Mr. DeBerry. 2. Keep ornamental lighting off until at least mid-evening. g, Search for sparrow nests and dispose of them, block off future nesting altos by screening etc. Linda Albert's biology classes at Denton High Two lectures were presented to Mrs. School. The students were interested in the disease aspects of blackbirt roosts plus the methods we are using to disperse roosts. A booklet on Urban Blackbird roost dispersal was put into rough draft form(See I enolosed.) Estimates on printing and distribution of the booklet were obtained. These estimates were used in preparing a grant proposal (See enolosedt)to the Wilson Ornithological Society for supporting this publication. Notifi ation of the Society's decision is scheduled for April 1980.It is my hope his bobklet can be of use to munioiplaities what are having roost problems, Continued surveillance of blackbird flock movement is being maintained. AS long as the roosts are not in heavily poyulatel ares.se these roosts will be left alone. Sally S. Erdman, Consulting ornithologist r I cot Dr. M.E.Husy i Dr. H.E.Collier a ( A gl~{y ly,RYr~' TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY AY(j/ *%C eve 23971, TWv b:ar.rn. Dxrriow. Texas reeve 4 ENrch 1980 Drsarrwas or lw~.oas NI. King Cole City Kanger's Office City of Denton Denton, Texas 76?.01 Dear Dir. Coles i In regards to the blackbird situation in Denton, we have thus been spared any g great influx of wintering birds, or those pushed southward due to inclement weather such as was the case last winter. There have been scattered complaints as to messes vroated by flocks of cedar waxwings which have been intown lately, r but these birds are highly mobile end not considered a continuing problem. A continued svirvoillance has been maintained for movements of large numbers of I blackbirds into our area, former roosts such as Schmitz F1:neral home, )eaumont Nursing Center and TWU are regularly checked. i I aye incorrespondence with Chief Courville, Duncanville Police Dept, In regards 3 to a recent mass death of starlings in that community. The City of Bay City,Nichigan j has also been contacted about their urban problems of roosting startngs. Revision 1 and re-writing continues on the proposed pamphlet of effective urban blackbird roost j control. Comments and suggestions I had requested from the Fish and Wildlife people ! in Denver, Colorado have just been received end ehall be indorporated into the pamphlet. Attached lease find please my statement for February 1980• g I . x Sincerely, sally So E dman, Consulting ornithologist coi Dr. N.F.Nuey Dr. R.R.Coilier T s ~r~,.r Mr~., ...._.....r.._ ...................swe w. ._~,.r.r+i~.:a..mww...v~.......v~rwwrn.r..wa.w,a'urn..~:r•a•vw.wYM?WNMN.IR.~?YNwyMM1t~,y.~ "D2 Texas Street Denton, Texas Mr, King Cole City Manager's Office City Hall Denton, Texas July 7, 1980 rei Activities in urban blackbird control work for June 1980, The anticipated buildup of urban blackbird roosts is a reality at this writing. I answered a call for assistance from Mr, A, Hunter on E. Oak St, whcae residence and yard was being smeared and otherwise made unhealthy by a roosting flock of grackles and starlings numbering in the 1,500 to 2,000 individuals, Using the taped distress signals and other hazing techniques, 1 was able to disperse and discourage the birds roosting in his trees, I had the cooperation of the Denton Police who patrolled the area each evening as I was working and consider the local dispersal a success, The birds re-located in areas along the railroad tracks where they no longer constitute a nuisance or threat, Mr, Hunter is in poor health and did not need the buildup of filth over his yard, the gardens, his autueobile and property in general The major problem at this writing is a growing roost in the area of Coit-Denton Ste, and northward along Anna and Alice Ste, A limited noise campaign is planned in the near future, Rather than disrupt the rodeo at the Fairgrounds this coming week, I have postponed action until at leant the following week, Mr. Hagemann$ City Fire Marshall and I will also be meeting to establish the risks involved in using pyrotechnical devises under our current drought conditions, All the guns are s being checked and cleaned by Denton Police Dept. personnel. I i Until I fool it is safe to proceed with the above, I am continuing to use the E taped distreos calls in localised situations on Nestway St, (Mrs, Meal's residenco), 4 ( The week ofJuly 7), The printer proofs for the pamphlet I as putting together on urban blackbird control are in hand. Details as to coats art distribution must be decided before I proceed further with the pamphlet. Dr, Archie Flowers of Texas A & M has been intouch with me regarding my giving a paper to municipal animal control offinera who will be convening a meeting at A & M this coming November, c I have also been working on modifications of ground traps for english sparrows which have been a problem with some local residente, However, roosting blackbirds are of t primary importance and despite the record heat, their numbers are increasing daily. As soon as the safety limits can be dafined,we will be able to proceed with dispersal efforts, i Res of ll submit coi Dr, M.E.Huey Sally Ornitholloogiccaatconsultant z E Dr, As Collier i rt t i f TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY Dom 27971. 71NV ar.Tw D=wrow. Taus Taa ? 17a~i1 1980 1 DcrANTHS" Oi B.OLC01 Kr. King Cole City lhna,ger's Office City of Denton, Denton, Texa& ?6201 Revisions and re-writing continue with the booklet on Urban Blac~bird Control 1;ethods. Hopefully you will see a draft by this time next month. 'ontaot was made with the current owners of property on F. f?cKinnoy who have a ' large concentration of binds roosting to the rear of their property whore they are not creating a porblem thus far.. fir, Abe Tuggel, City of Carland Superintprdant of Animal Control has conferred with $ me in reagrds to possible control methods. I plan on further contact with him and his { association with Animal Control people. J J Attached It, a copy of a. book review Dr. Roland Vela asked vie to do for his Te~cas ~~f 1 Journal of Science Attached also im my statement for consultancy foe for Farch 1980. r Respectfully submitted) Sally 9, man, Ornithological Consultant { cot Drs Robert Collier Dr, f;.;Iuey t I i 1. 1 ~ 'l'M.XAS WOMAN'S ITNINTHIS11Y Pm V9,11, ntw sr.non D"rov. True ruiar 41 h. r,.r vrnr .n PwLrcr ji tp+' - it x%i f' •i91fla! OP 'bCS~ vc- tkt)arlrr,L u! :,1•~1J[?y Narth ^i.:xa- ~tet~ ~In iver It.y 17.''nton, 'ii•xi?.S rcl ,,-h ;?oViell - 'slydr of ^.ra~ran~ Cuw~n~ by ',arrpn i . ;Mich; 2nd Edition. Prlnt'41 by branch-8ndth, Inc., Fort '.forth, T.+xas, 1979- i the Eiri~of rsrrant Cunt ry Dr. Warren lunch, 2nd . dition, Should rreva to to a handy refc-cnal booh for th. -sore serir c;. birnl-watchers in north central Vxa , ae. w.+11 as other zrcar; whlnll r,tvirc tl,e same reroral topography. Dnsptte it tttlr, it should Le t.,n~rally h,?lpful for this region of the country. Tho oz-ganlzztlun fulL;wa t?lo r•amc format that t used in the standard field "Ides an that uairsg it in cagy. ach order and family under that order is briefly dercrllAA Ictrtlunr a to status, arrival and depat.uiv datrls for tlc r.ijtrttrry 1Sr,3r, as wrll ar. within the c, u„Ly irl ro th1v (eior wren fourwls lOlpful co,-ornts as to simllar nrcclc-- rrhich salEht 1. cr ~r 1funed with the bird in question are added when more than cre rpocl-,r• n1 are cios^ to one wh•.n n-'cn in ihn field. T'f,v black and whi to illustrc;ionn drawl- by the author'-, .,iie, annc.:arle Julich, are spaced throughout the text and add interest tr, the look. '11)o cnntnnt rrfleW, the do.op interLst and long yearn cpont by the author in collect- ing this inforrwtion and then O)arina it with others; by publishing its 'dith the inclUEion of a fold-out rap of Tarrant County, a chart presenting the seasonal occurrence of all spcotes dercribod in the text, plus an index of all eoml.ton names of thc,ao biriu, one i, gl vcn -.n excell- 0 picture of the entire county and its tIOlife. lbi,~ Bonk can to rl:aiily u:;(41 by a ntraiVer to this region and Tarrant County In parti!:ular. Dr. 1'ylllch not onl; lirt% what bind is there, but when and j where it might tc found. 1i j DiscursSon of .ub-pccic3 and race; lull;ht not W (f prime importance to thv average 1i Mr1vrl how^ver, the iuclu:,Sun of the varl)u.- moon!., dcalinq with these stiWivisionr, pll.:; the lncatirn of 'ha tylx~ 1~'cimcn aliowo mare serious ornithologists to pursue this aspect. 1n rasonal gzirj)h at tho erld of the book quickly tells the observer what 1 t 4 his chanco:r. are of .r-ing a jzrLlcular (-lK)cier, at any giv^n time throughout the year, 'ilds is an ercoll,mt feature of the book and aids in identification. 'D,o author, with his conci~s duacrl.l,Llono of each tdrd, often lets hin enthuslanm show by sharing h1s poraonal fluld obrervationm with the reader. This further enhanc j the book an a valuable tl oljwfu a u:ed in eunjunction with one of the nt.andrni field guides, in thc+ identification of over 100 slvcies of binds that might be it this area, I heart reco,r.mend his boot for AnyouI1p intQneat in birds of this re66lon.(The litE r1rant Coun by 'darrcn F.. lulich, 7nr1 : is ava! able ;ijrough the Fort r u u n"5xT~y, 204( Glenco Torraco, Fort North,'fx, 7~110r Vs2g plus $1.00 pontar'c,) k'.eview3ri wally 9, 'adman, C?ratlthological Consultant Lo Texas Homar►'s University, Denton and the City E of Da neon, Tenn,. TEXAS WONIAX'S UNIVERSITY So, M71, TWU SrATWN Drx'rox. TsxAs teen April 30, 1980 ~TiAI1TMiNT DI B.DLOOT Mr. King Cole City Manager's Office City of Denton, Denton, Texas 76201 rot Blackbird Control Activities I responded to two calls about nuisance birds. One located in far northeast Denton (Edinburg St.) and the other in south Denton (Jacqueline). Noise and rA sn was cottplained of in both situations. The Sherman-Edinburg site (a vacant lot) is a tang-tailed Grackle rookery or nesting site ani has been for a number of years, Residents in the area have been complaining but managing to live with the r.,cket and mesa. A count of the tall hedge thaso birds have been using indicates that over 60 birds used this hedge as a Posting site last year. Efforts are inderway to disrupt the birds and disperse them. Of all the"blackbirds" we have been daaling with, this species is the loudest I and most obvious. This rookery is a localized nuiedance and probably does not pose a health haaard as such. The Jacqueline St. site is being plagued by the same birds, although only a few nesting pairs have been seen, The citium who complAined was advised as to possible control of their problems. 3 ~ The maausoript for urban bird control is in its final typing and should be ready this coring week. It will then be put into printed f)rm for distribution, l Attached also is my statement for consultanoy fee for April 1980, I i { coi Dr. M.E.Huey Respectfully submitted, ~ . Dr, Robert Collier / Zly S3, , Ornithological Consultant t f ~I 1 I i i I i August 5, 1980 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITIM f 1 SUBJECT: Receive Final Draft of 1980 Electric Power Supply Study and Take Action as Appropriate. SUMMARYe The Public Utility Board at their June 25, 1980, meeting recommended to the Council acceptance of the 1380 Electric Power Supply Study conducted by Gilbert Associates. The Board further recommended that the recommendations contained in the report be accepted and implemented. The main recommendations containe9 in the report ares 1. That the City of Denton should continue to operate its Electric utility as presently planned with TMPA } furnishing wholesale electricity. { E That if and when the Agency proposes another project, ` 2. the City of Denton should conduct an independent study to assure that the Agency project is the best alternative for the City. 3. That if further consideration is given to the sale of 11 the system, the value of the system is determined to E be in the range of $43 million to $57 million. The Board expressed concern that if the Electric System were to be sold, the higher cost for utilities and/or the lose of s transfer to the General Government would only be offset by e the proeceeds of the sale until 1990. Thereafter, the higher utility costs and/or loss of transfers would be several million dollars per year. v ! FINANCIAL SUMMARYs See Report Exhibit tV-C-1 (Total Operating Revenues) and ; V-D-19 (Total Revenue line). i [a i s y e i i i i ACTION REQUIRED: Accept 1980 Electric Power Supply Study and establish City of Denton position regarding recommendations involving} 1. Continued operation of Denton Electric Utility. 2. Continued participation with TMPA in present projects. 1 3. Future participation with TMPA In future projects. 4. Sale of Electric System. Respectfully, i I, ff 1 R. E. Nelson I Director of Utilities i 11 E%BISITSt I. Executive Summary II. Final Draft of 1980 Electric Posner Supply III. Minutes of June 25, 1980, Public Utility Board Meeting IV. Exhibits 1V-C-1 & V-b-19 s j t k R ni eaeawa { EMUB1T 1 STI;D1' PURPOSE EXECUTIVE SV!T4ARY I In Nc,verber, 1979, the City of Dorton engaged the Management Consulting Division of Gilbert Associates, Inc. to perform a comprehensive load forecast / and power supply planning study for the period 1980-1990. The demand and l energy forecast served as a basij for strzcturing several mutually exclusive power supply alternatives from which au optimal program could be identified to insure reliable and economical sources of electricity supply for the citizens of Denton. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Load Forecast - For the period 1960-1990, it was concluded that the economic and electric system growth potential for the City of Denton is strong and should exceed national expectations. Total system energy requirements and annual system peak lmad are forecast to grow at an equivalent compound annual rate of approximately 6.3 percent. Tr,tal City population is fore- cast to grow at an annual rate of 3.6 percent, resulting in an 8.2 percent annual growth rate in residential sales. Co=ercial and industrial sales ' are a pect+.d to grow at a compound annual rate of 5.7 percent. Table 1 summarizes the for cast of electric demand and energy requirements fo: tha City of Denton. TABLE 1 CITY OF CENTON 1 Summary of Load Forecast Results Actual Predicted Growth Rate I 1979 1990 197990 ENERGY (KU'H x 106) 1 i Residential Sales 133 316 8,2 C^-nmerciai d Industrial Sales 276 511 S.7 } Sighting d Other Sales 24 27 113 i Sales for Resale 1 a z i 'focal Sales 464 864 614 , j Losses 6 Unaccounted For 28 53 6.2 i 1 Total Energy Input 462 909 6.3 ANNUAL S1'5TEM PEAR hS.' 109 214 6.3 , x, M ~ S r CaailCe~nMwuM ~ y z' 8 1 r r J~I I WWI ..4.n iS 4 ~1) k e 7 Power Suppiv Alternatives - Based on the Load Forecast and the identified need for new teneration capacity for chore case studios other then Caae Cj:`4', 1 a number vi rutually exclusive alternatives were structured for analysis. Thsae alternatives includedt at Case A - Indeptndent expansion of Denton's Electric Utility System. s. The three options developed consisted of a 100 Xw coal-f eel unit, tepowering Denton's existing gas-fired units, and the addition of combustion turbines. =Np Case B - Joint venture between Denton and private or public utilities in presently planned new coal and lignite fired units. 4 Case C - Continued Denton participation with Texas Yunicipsl Pawar Agency as presently planned including participation in Gibbons Creak No. 1 and Corr-o.-he Peak 1 b 2 and transmission related projects. !S Case D - Sale of the Denton Electric Utility System to an investor- i owned utility. i Use E - Purchase Power options 1;hith included a 100 percent purchase 9 of wholesale power from available sources or a firm purchase contract for specific capacity amounts. Cate F - A qualitative assessment of advanced technologies for power E { production with emphasis on refuse derived fuel.. This was not developed for analytical comparisons to other alternatives. I E For each esae, it was necessary to develop operating costs and as appropriate, annual carrying cberges for indicated capital expenditures. Operating costs 1 j ? consist of fuel and operation and maintenance costs and were determined bayed upon the load forecast and a production costi7r, model that simulated Dentoa's daily load shapas, generation capacity, tuinttoance achedults and equipment { I forced outaga rates. Debt service requirements associated with the capital } expenditures for each altarnativa were combined vith operating costs to i determine total revenue requireroenta for each tlt.-natlva. j i _F I { rY M~ 1 . owl The revenue requirements for each of the mutually exclusive alternatives are summarized in Table 2 to illustrate cost differences between study cases, t The table presents capital requirements, the percent wureh of revenue requirements for the eleven year period, and a levelited unit cost for comparison purposes. The study results indicate that all cases are cost competitive and attractive dependent upon risk and the degree of certainty associated with the study data, A joint venture with Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) had the lowest customer coat. Hovever, as expanded upon in the report, this cat* 'does not carry the degree of accuracy or confidence level associated with Cate C which h ' as only a slightly greater customer cone, while the results indicate that all of the Cases (except Case E - Firm Purchase Contract) are within 10 percent of the lowest coat case, the difference between Casa C and all others would most likely increase if the study period were expanded pas; , 1990, Consequently, it is concluded that Denton participation in TMPA is the most attractive course for continued Ci;y operation, i TABLE 2 CITY 05 DbNTON Summary of Econonie Comparisons 1980-1990 II ' Case Descriptions Capital Investment Preterit worth 11 Year Lavalised I( of Revenue customer Coat Unit Re uireme is -L2)- (00's (D00 s $ Mills Kwh CASE A 1-Mw Coal-Fired Unit $2041000 $3449485 63.65 a Repower Existing Units 880000 348,180 66.35 f Combustion Turbines 31,100 337,476 64.31 CASE I } Joint Venture - LCRA 1330000 313,821 Joint Venture - TP&L 128,000 59,80 f 335,000 63.84 ? J CASE C Continued Operation-T1dPA 233,000(1) 315,591 60.14 CASE E Wholesale Power 0 320,692 61.11 Firm Purchase Contract 0 3760688 72,16 (1) Denton's Approximate Shere of TVA's Capital Expenditures (2) based on a 71 Discount Rate i tsms Ituav*wto . . .Sul Sale of the Svstem - The analysis of alternative sources of power supply sisulted in the selection of Case C, Denton's continued purticipation in MIA, as the most economic course of action assuming continued City operation of the electric system. / J An investigation of the feasibility of selling the system to an external party must center about the determination of a purchase price which would render the City's ratepayers economically indifferent to continued opera- tion (in accordance with Case C) or a transfer of the franchise to another utility. Future costs under ou~side ownership are overwhelmingly reprotented by customer billings in accordance with the schedule of tariffs in effect, proposed or projected fof the prospective purchaser. To a much lesser extent, projected costs under alternative ownership ate associeted with the assumed continued maintenance of the street lighting system, the i increased burden of reallocated common costs or the loss of revenues by ocher City Departments in the absence of the electric utility and the direct loss of income to the City otherwise projected from that sleurces to the event of a sale of the system, the City's ratepayers would not, I i i of course, be faced with those costs of continued peration as exemplified i by Case C. Additionally, they would benefit directly of indirectly from incremAntal property taxe: paid to the City by the new owner and by the release, after payment of outstanding indebtedness, of funds otherwise required for operation of the system or restricted on account of debt indenture requirements. Over the eleven year horizon viewed in this study, discounted future costs exceeded discounted future benefits of a sale of the system by a margin established at $43 million and $57 million depending upon the level of rates assumed for the purchasing utility. The sale price would then have f to serve as the balancing factor. ? y I rob Af ft"tom m fps . Stated otherwise, a sale price in the range of $43 million to $57 million would render Denton's electric utility ratepayers indifferent to continued operation by the City or sale of the system to Lither Texas Power & Light F, Cempaay or Community Public Service Company, the two most likely candidates 14 for such purchase. The two sale prices were established alternatively at zrate levels under the Texas Utilities Commission's recent order with .*s -aspect to the Texas P&L Co. case and at the level represented in Texas PdT. Company's original request for rate relief. An important note to consider is that no attempt was made to evaluate the effect of the sale on individual customer classes. Since no two utilities' have the same mix of customers, or in fact, the same cost to serve a particular class of customer, it is anticipated that if a sal+ st+ould occur, some customers would inevitably be more impacted than others. For this and similar reasons, a decision to sell the electric system should be based on a consideration of many factors other than the base economics set forth in this study. E RECO*: MATIORS # The following actions are recommendad to provide the citizens of Denton with t j continues economical and reliable electric power. o The City of Denton should continua to opa:ste its Electric Utility as presently planned and executed with WA, This does not include any additional projects proposed by the Agency unless it ten be reasonably doeume3ta4 that the costs to Denton are lour than purchased { power optiona or joint ventures in other lignite facilities. c Further discussions should be. held with Texas Power 6 Light Lad Coamiu- 1 I pity Public Service Company whereby the basic aseucptiona made in the analysis of the sale of the system are reviewed fer comment. In this f manner a further determination can be made as to th+,iv int+:est in a ' possible sale and their willingness to commit funds for an independent evaluation. ? In addition, it is also recommended that continuous Mon,toring of the situation be maintained to that evaluations can be shade pa;iodicaliy if a i Cecl7tertuymmhA ~`y.. Wr . . ""'fit t i conditions change from the basic assur.ptions described harsia. The sensitive oreas for review include the rates of Texas Power b light and other Texas utilities{ the fuel costs of TIPA and Denton$ Purchase power costs, and the price tendered for the possible purchass o! the electric utility. i , i t ' I ' i i j J IV ~ f i I i f ~ t } i j E i 11 i I I i E}WSSIT 111 PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES June 25, 1980 Members Presents Chairman, George Krieger, Jim Nash, Roland Laney, Marvin Loveless and Bob Nelson Others Presents Staffs Ernie Tullos, Earl Jones, Bob Fiorini, Bill McNary and C.J. Taylor Oths:rss Nita Thurman, Denton Record Chronicle Absentr Td Coomes, Chris Hartung 1. MINUTES of the joint meeting with the City Council on June and the special called meeting of June ll, 1980, were reviewed. Laney added a correction to the June 10, 1980, minutes to read, "It w.ns noted that in arriving at the sale price of $43 to $57 million, the proceeds from the sale } would be exhausted by 1990." Krieger also added a correction to the June 10, 19800 minutes under item 2 to make his statement read, "The Utilities Board needs to understand the Council's policy regarding transfers of funds from Utilities to General Government and the use of utility funds for non-utility projects". After a brief discussion, Loveless made a motion to accept the June 1^. 1980, minutes with 1. Laney's and Kr::ger's corrections and the June 11, 1980, minutes as stated, Second by Nash, four ayes, no naves, motion carried. , 2. CONSIDER 1980 ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY STUDYr Krieger opened discuss ons by asking the other Board members for any corrections to the Gilbert Associates draft report, Krieger t requested the board to formulate a recommendation to the City Council with regard to the report, Laney commented that the study period, 1980 to 19900 showed only the difference in costs to utility rate payers for a ten year period. In the eleventh year, rate payers could see a large jump in electric I costs Mince proceeds from the sale of the system would be exhausted. Krieger commented that he felt that some ofi Gilbert's assumptions on inventories of fuel, transformers, etc., were too low, After considerable discussion, Krieger made a motion to recommend to the City Council that they accept the Gilbert report and implement the recommendations I contained therein. Second by Loveless, four ayes, no naves, J motion carried. 11 4 i E~ F i r. ( LHLLILIY•g1• I i CLt1. 18, 1tyi I'N Dist U- Not I n w a 0 u i t(!6'J. Y I1 h 110A lltblL:IllL.d'i'il ~ f! 1900 1901 Me 911 1004 1981 1161 1911 --1 OR;— U7U AYYYn~b. ,llrr 41r4 , 1 iS 41,111 SI p 6 l},SN1 tt,{9 11 H4 J1 S]! 47,4040 44 1 _ ~y6 }Ii.~.K ~~t ~ ' TuIr110 r1Y1lnAoArrrlnuel r~~'~"~ j~-~j'~"^~~~-•---~~~~--~i~~--- _.,4 ~'~._..,~,''102 SS,191 SY ~,41} "w a Ydtio$16 Dom 11,V7e ria r6J r,a tu,mt Iron T117A (l) It'll? 11,D1] i{,iiJ lh,7f6 1),14) 1} Y!1 80,118 41,017 !4,010 7D,411 huJ,ml luU uW 946 Y91 t 040 I,DYS 1,4040 1,701 S,tGI 1,111 0,100 I,Abe I,S{I L rn r"inlm, 1 Dlrtl lLutlan Ado I,M6 1,110 1,791 1,571 1,12 L I,Gl9 1,110 1,{b{ 1,728 1,016 O,AlurrJ Aulrr 8 1,1,4 189 YIII 111 1,019 I,Rp 1,414 1,715 1,!71 1,JJ9r0r/!!-- (110j)7_ `1`,714 [S~ 41rln1 rllrllrr 1 Criwrrl ,-0 Tut+l Upuroglty inlormrr 13;~lJ 49 r' EF,i9b'S0,1' 19,144-xodli 63 6, }Tf -fd,~ ..)1, }4 , 1L TiS~ _.~l1,~ ~ tgfirdt , 1LL9*I NA r I N0 'I 1 8,4 JS Y,'JUL JI ),401 4,40,6 A,SSS 4,6401 A,IIY 4,000 1,44{ 1,441 , L~11Lltltlam lub 110 4W 400 400 401 172 1,(41 1,062 1 ,1NM I,rtS ^7 4 l~ldlL'Y-~171.1t:.9.jF'llu 1,141 1,410 J, ?L4 1,L31 S,048 4,9640 f,174 6,UN L,{f4 e,1E1 L,))2 f , lUL1BNY1rJ k ivl Lwm 6~K I,866 I,w 1,110 I,IYJ 1,141 I,IJI 1,511 'I,ly) ),081 2,(150 (,Y4Y i l.mwn tiupunrJ 1711 }YY 4W 76f NI Nth 061 1,110 I,l{t 1,171 rM l lly I Tr141 1441 1,'Irlrr '~'~tlM6 I,973_.'.••'F,iS•~•.~~,19a.~r1 1 ,1,;---T H ___-TT61'..."0 Lori, logo lntlu I,Lf 1.76 Li) 1,74 ~,li 1,11 ~,hl J.Oj },401 /,a7 I,D4 MIML!JtJlL!!I&JIJ'tliiJ 1,711 1,508 I'm 1,663 1,111 ArlJrrau,t timJ 7,el1 2,141 1,061 1,042 1,701 1,11%1 hrorr YouJ NS 151 180 lC0 71 it IYU lNU f0 f0 WullnYr'+w7 tonJ 11 11 IS 11 1 Y 20 JU 1vltrrr nl gad 11) (U.I 1019) (190) ({Ip 411) (10) (6f 11 (Y1H (1,008! 41,1161) dd 1 (1,1771 rt ni1 l Copilot [W 4110111 }Yep) 176(1) 801(7) 10)(1) 118(4) $14141 fS1 !{f 181 811 !0{ Tuw(vr is uunrr+l fuBJ I,H7 1,114 1,N9 1,506 1,601 1,10{ 1,111 1,911 2,111 i knrru In lwplrwarrt truJ Y,M I 1,})1 11D NJ 901 1,116 1,911 IANEY: III Lx ludoo mint.'" rtr111 fog i.nrd no gun IJ) flan In:ru YuAlnf Crplul ow fWid, ltju, IrvrJ to Irgnuvln.rnt tvnJ III lu, toruwol f4n8 "Id to gal rr~uily AVP4441" ,opl-1tl rry.rnJltatrr rnlrpl 00 110,4 Id) l.~Jnrr of lrrruxrr rug r1 J."I U. rc,l lid rhr,l r"Id lr) rgKnJl lurrr ~l f 1 V I ~w.........~.,......,,..,w.. ,.....G....rea'aw r+g1~+71w r+. , i ' ~ rt ~2i11111 1x1.2 L y ~ 'Idt~l'~ y<<.~~ ty t~, • lunar I,ro21v l1 uJV . 0nr p 1g.~ { ~ ~ • A71HC1R W 1eflm~16 1T IXiSi M hY11A1L' 1 t I``I It t.d 2uu11 1•Lly1,t [y/ 1cr1A f' 0A6t - ..-~_,....~~1T.V_ IYft 14 171] 1964 I e 9 A lbel ,_61a ..~J~~. 199Q,~r, I K 7j hi. to tutl~A 16,347 11,N77 19,061 20,)21 21,167 21,142 1),)64 71,476 24,460 2!,010 1S,ffl M01 04104 1".m 114,202 141,644 204,14 Art, not{ par 14A1 game 5 771,1!4 240,111 141,269 274,711 227 140 MI 19b 716,410 .0Jt4 ,Olit 11114% ,Olnl 0161 ,71000 ,h,)6 ,d,il dh4 ,6!72 ,6560 ,0160 lS} y • Total Q~T a, ! /716~Q TES , Ann1w1 YVO r (51,0005 tu/too4ter call W 117/tort, $20 ,0A— ',D S b14~.b611'•._.~,p91a 1,047 9,17J 1(I,426 11,11) 14,464 16,710 11,761 20,656 13,114 11,903 11,141 TVIAl 1106141.1141 J/ It•,,._ dj" A}11~ 1't9-r. /AS !~1"],Ij' 1,! 1111 (Sl,aro1 3.11 _../1;11.11.71E _11.nJl~.l1121~.. ?2LzLL}{2 1 1 ~1A 77!,277 111, 110 Mf,tl54 1il,Dtl1 fUl ,071 U1 660 /fU u1S 464,4 401 414,111 14.,116 510,114 W i Artl. Curt over rt111 . seyd Will p7v1 ,6 1d, ,011% 011! 0702 ,610 64S) ,04)1 ,0G 64 W,97 ,0510 Tu'Al 1_1~ L~-.Uil2_. + 11j q~~p~~ 1 0~?1 p~ yip 7 • "•0401 0G91 0lf2 :36~ 51 "'yb~i lib,}.-.allL~b11S~c9i "-'aa343 4nm1t tart t51,111U) J1A1L.__U,jU._M M 20.11x 'x.42}-- 16.01 _.11A" 11.1 1S._._1LI51_..._I'1. L41,.._S1,!'J r vub . 1 2001 1/Ie1 11,4110 21,211 21,%0 14,40 ! 27,114 11 Sul 75.176 24,141 26 411 76 790 27 111 Avg. tuft 441 %MI • side ,0141 01,5 011611 ,0175 .001101 ,0101 alit 0160 •0164 ,6406 '6661 .6{{f • Yubl x all c MS rea I0.; ; 411054 01 • l r/. 06 Sit PS9 9 6..:nu1 C'ut1 (11,000) 1,061 1,001 1,111 1,271 1,160 t,416 I,Sp 1,671 1,19) 1,011 2,101 1 1alL M1 417 ~7,1114__..!)t, 171, Iy1,01)4 140 6111 14) 4rl J111 101K !S6 /!1 140 tlf 5►6.14~ 17~►= f K~ 1 CITY 07 DENTON MEMORADUM i 1 DATES August 5, 1980 AGENDA ITEMS Bid 18794 URD 4/c aluminum cable I j I SUMMARY: This bid is fo. the purchase of 159000 feet of aluminum electrical cable to replace warehouse stock. This material is used by the electrical distribution department for maintenance and new construction in underground service areas. FISCAL SUMMARY: The funds for this purchase will be taken from the working capital account 05-98-87-08 i warehouse electrical inventorq purchases. The charges for the cable will be applied to the s using department budget account as it is charged out of this warehouse. k ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and award of bid. E None ~ ALTERNATIVES: STAFF RECOMHENDATIONSs We recommend this bid be awarded to the low I bidder Temple Inc. at $1395.00/0 fast for a total of $20,923.00, 'F'OB Denton" Net. 30 days, 3 day delivery after receipt of order. EXHIBITS: Tabulation sheet 1 SUBMITTED BY, Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M, Asst. Purchasing Agent i i i . i f a DID 1 8794 DID URD Cable _ Graybar Nelson Priester Star Elect Temple WESCO ElectTlca OPEN2pm, July 24, 1980 Elect. Elect, Supply Elect. Dist. Pro c. ACCOUNT N T QTY. ITEM AIM-' VENDOR VENDOR --VENDOR V ENDOP.- VENDOR VUN[ib „ L URD 4 alum. cable 1420,10 1648.50 1522.00 1474,00 1395.00 1450.00 1445.00 Delivery stock 120 days 60 days 3 days 3 days 30 days 7-10 days Terms net, net, net, net, net* net, net. FOB Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton 1 , ' ~~IMIiiiMGiMkM w.a.pw..ewir........,.~>.r......,-.».~.._....r_._.._........w....K~..~..w.....,......~++..~......w- .............~.ui..r,,.....,.. 1`t --rte CITY OF DEN70N MEMORANDUM DATEi August 5, 1980 AGENDA ITEMS Bid 48791 Paisley Street Paving and Drainage Improvements SUMMARY: This bid is for the furnishing of materal and installation for improved drainage and paving. This includes some 2,820 square yards of 5 inch asphalt pavement, 1560 linear feet of concrete curb and gutter, 330 square yards of 4 inch concrete sidewalk, and 102 square yards of G" reinforced concrete pavement, as per bid requirements and specifications. This invitation was sent to 20 prospective vendors. FISCAL SUMMAAYs This is a community development block grant project and will be paid by grant funds. i ACTION Rf,QUIREDi Accept the low bid as recommended. ALTER:LITIVES 1 None STAFF RECOMMENDAT10Ni We recommend this bid be awarded to the low Sidder. Jae Siegmund Construction Co., Inc. of Gainesville for the amount of $540048.560 subject to the approval of the contractor, United States Department of Housing and Urban I Development, t LXHIBITSt Tabulation sheet SUBMITTED BYt John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent > y 1~ t I 7 i i a p 1 r 1 . l• .r i I DID I~gjp1 BID Paisley Street Paving S Drai age Jagoe Calvert Siegmund OPEN July 29, 1980, 2 »m - _ Public Paving Const. ACCOUNT Co. ~ T -i' b f GER D E y fiRb~3~- V iSb~-' M -Total of Bid 63.43~ y 74,$49.00 54,048.56 I - Bid hood ea yes i 1 MpRM4.NM 911NYVNM~+~"wwrw...ww...tiw..~..-~..-...............~........_.~.~..~ ,...~........_....~....~..,...~..o.....,.....».~......«~~ ......mow .~f Z:'r f i 1 City of Denton Memorandum August 5, 1:80 Agenda Item: i Approval of the final replat of lot 6 and part of lot 7, block A of Brownwood Addition. Summary-: The property owner desires to build an addition to his residence, but the proposed addition would extend over his property line. Therefore he has acquired an adjacent parcel and seeks to replat the entire tract into one lot. All subdivision requirements have been met. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the final replat of Brawnwood Addition. The Planning, Engineering, Utility, and Fire € Departments have each reviewed tha replat and recommend approval. j t Action Required: i E The City Council should move to approve the final replat of lot 6 and part of lot 7, block A, Brownwood Addition. ; Exhibits: A, Memo B. Map a I i : r 1 `~Ll • I ' C f • . Y" v~ei~,rr rM \ I ktl ~ , • r S JO i 4wm Ix COMWttIN~ gm E City of Denton 1 Memorandum ` August so 1980 I Agenda Item: Approval of the final replat of lots 1 and 24, and part of lots 2 and 23, fff of block and all loon 1, 2, and 3, and and of lots 4 and 7 of block 6, of Sequoia Park Addition. Summary: The developer seeks to replat a portion of Sequoia Park Addition for development of single family housing. In this case the developer will be allowed to make taps off the existing water line and necessary taps of the sewer line; a utility department employee will supervise the operation. This is being permitted because the length of time required to wait for the City to perform this work would be an unreasonable hardship upon the developer. ~ i The developer is also extending an off-site sewer line northeastward along Mingo Road. i Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the linal replat of this section of Sequoia Park Addition The Planning, Engineering, Utility and Fire Departments have each reviewed the final replat and recommend approval. , Action Required: l The City Council should move to approve the final re lat of j J and part of lots 2 and 23 of block 6 and all of lotspl, 2, ardt 3,landapar`t r of lots 4 b 7 of block 6, Sequoia Park Addition. II Exhibits: A. Memo B. Map ~ 1, ~ i VICINITY MAP n i s Its :[auatgtt K • o ~IQSii1 s r CREEK .4VEM~rE J { 1 i I 1 9 aleIKK 1( (q(Y(Kt r t g~i i 10-R, ~ . r • 7 r { age 9•R doic so,Itoouo. N CTAW $o AV Ntle /-R Yr: •r ' it 1.rt, i i ` r h ! + tow aaw( e.n i( (Man, ~ 9 ~R I ~ ~v eK nt uteanq ~ +I! j 0• R d i o t 44R I z +l SuRK ogre 5 ~ i Hlla~l10~ 1 n i ult.r! 1 ZaA , Ap i i I 1EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL August S, 1980 1. Emergency Purchase Order in excess of $3,000 for replacement of air conditioning compressor and heat pump at the Denton Municipal Airport. 1 i i 1 1 I 7 I 1 I I i t I I i 1 , f 4 7 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 44611 411/3E2.%Ol D/FW Metro 251.0082 va004 NO. DAn 8-5-80 Do No. quote 1SSAl1 W.0 NO. I DSUYSIY DATI 8-11-80 ACCT. N0, 01-18-91-01 C.B.S. Mechanical • Rt. 1, Box 784 9W vu Denton, Texas 76201 Toi CITY OF DENTON Airport Airport Rd. Denton, Texas 16201 ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION QUAN. T PRICE AMOUNT 1. Replace a/c heat pump aow located in attic of Terminal Building vith a new carrier a/c heat pump model 38SQ-008-5, 7► ton, and locate the new unit on a pad on tho north aide of Terminal Building. All material and labor $4,198.00 I { The present unit is now out and beyond repair a fraon charge last only 5 days or less, I ~ 1 r I 1 ' t SHOW P,O. NO. ON All SWMENTS, OEUVVNIY TICKETS, WVOICU, ETC., NNO OMMIS IN OUFM TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE. THE CITY OF MTON, MEMAS K JEiW FROM MU TAX AS PER 1%NM S1ll M. TM CITY OP OENTON 19 MON111TED FROM PAY010 PM MMCHAWN SEPOq IT II RICIDM. ALL SIRPMENTS MUST SE F,0.1., eft OF OINTON, TIME. DIARY ALL 0IOUMP16 TO. CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEFT, a 71e E. mcowwv !Y PORM NO. 011216 Dorton' Tom 16201 ,f \ i P /T:WrYM tra~vaal Poll OOF CBS MECHANICAL. INC. HrArINO A AIR CONDITIONING A RLUMNINO CONTRACTINO• REPAIRMI Rowe 1. 60. 784 OPman. TA.ai NMI AT t John Marel:ell E 7) U7.750 i IrorpAq wwm1O ro r„oyr City of Denton Fu"hasjnX Coat, 66;P31 4 5uly 30, g9 TIACn q 13 ?,5 .rp r E. MCKinneY To a d ON VAT. COOP w. tou nOr ..[M Denton. Tx. 7, 201 Denton ooft an rur. r.Ort Non ne-- None F. Mnii I..n. rOYkNOq Fu.n~mnu b. [ n 1,tlp p i,&af C1Ri me 7 ^oate now Unit An jru:nd on ne~ U sid• of building. vlye nev retrsgar`nt ' liritta.,te new unit. 111 ma •1 ~~~meta. Pries deeA net inelude line yOltaae vi,~,p[~. _ ' i z' a' 1 k'. A. N 17 Aprald INet M artV" N IN =60 rIeeA for lacer end met«lelf n Is Oenteln or= IM the Patty Mu ft Acme alU a pad ro the sea or aonallad, Ina at NA• C4oe of OuNnw rovldad eeere, And In the avant two h nat Be pad ee "m to M A wm wl k00 IN, tar, "mRt'r M PntareM an m" amount front ne due d.te std In IN MM IN sane is aplHU&I W asnlum W Unuro U 1 AttoMay, Ina ►ro/ero Court or etvapuptey Court. We Wee to pAy a reoW We W$d 'i ro"II U In or th"K 8A olions" lo[' NeapAH MrADy to rwnM mANnN And wee . eampHlA In aecvO►noP F.In Algra tplrfiCAtgnA, he w rum of. 1 Fr u . sandI. Hundred imatY-Eight and no/100----- - - da4nft ~1. 10th 8,~~ { Y NwW • A.rrrrY. M Y Y YYa.i Y IN Y ..•M.1 • a ..M•xY .ua• Yr.'M a rYY.f YYMw M rNP" ON b•aP.. M Yu. MK KMrr•. YI. IYII M Y YM W WP r «a. ► w M AFrnr Y eAnMrT. j rr.wawww«wYwrY •I...r. *406. aM1 ~rb i h Y.rYt. Yrw w I.+P• O.w Y i1n~ Y1. YnYI W ~ Worn" NwFY IYq 1An N..FVI w ArP Y.rY A FN•.. r Cr.r.^rM iYrwM MIN& W by w 4 Fm -"PH { /K~ fArNNY ~ of proposal -N r... MK„ IPYrAr.lgnl W Feu w YlnIYtM w W WM' k„rM rw w Arlrorr„ el".tY~ { ' HAburMYwnAM. hrm..I .AY r`ral„.uM1nN iWra f! . (M. N ke.oHrcP tAvlw ' d I