HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-09-80
~w
i
i
i
1
AGENDA
CITY Of DENT0N CITY COUNCIL
Decambar`9► 1984 '
3F ,
City Counoil'et
r' Denton
epeoial Celled Meeting Of the City Of ' k•;
4~d0 p.ti., Tte$4Syr Deoember or 1980, at f►cae Erick Plant- a.
1 a,,
Tour of home arlok CoNpahy and Aemonetration of
Reeour04 Recovery prooeee. !I r
t ,
P
I
I ~ sr !
I I
1 }
I
1
I
r i
t r
k
I
~r
A'O
.
•
y t. w y ~e~ * r' h' r 1 . l.'~. Y~tiX W''i. r1 }a
AL
/17
now
iL l a---.y7. -J sit
n i ,
F, [2
7-j r+'
I .7` a + • dam' 4J` ~ + .7}, ~1~~«` ; '~'\'\'Js / r ~
\ \ II a''' ACNE BRICk s t' 1`1` t" t v * ~r
yr• - ~ i
r. \ ~f. ' ~ ~ •.rr.~.~•\' ~ ~'~r7i` f.. ~ ~ r'~ ~ y A'4 1 r Vy
J 'r
c
I y
I
I`
i
I
i
1
i mil
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December 10, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM A6
SUBJECT: Extension of Airport Management Contract with Aviation and
Transportation Consultants.
SUMMARY: The contract with ATC allows either ~.rty to terminate the.
` contract after the first year of its existence. In order determine the worth of this contract, thb Airport Board and "
Staff have conducted an extensive evaluation of ATC performance r,
' under the contract. ATC': performance during the first year
has been rated.fully satisfaotory in most arets'and above
expeotanoy on others
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or Disapproval of extending the Airport
management contract.
r
ALTERNATIVES: Approve contract and continue with current Airport<
Management. Disapprove contract And direct Etaff to
pursue other methods of providing for Airport Management.
SOURCE OF FUNDSs Airport Budget
RECOMMENDATIONS The Airport Advisory Board at its December 150 10A04
meeting considered this item. Based on the resulki of
the ATC Performanca Evaluation the Board unanimouslyy
recommends approval of the contract extension for the
additional two year period. The Staff concurs with this
recommendation.
EMIBIT: I, Performance' Evaluation Report.
Ii. Performance Evaluation Documente.
i
1
" `r•
MIMI
,.i',• r r -P, de .1 q"!. o P re.'5r'nt 'rev
i
I
CITY OF DENTON i
i
M1940RANDUM j
TO$ a. Chris Hartung, City Manager i .
r
FROMi Bill Angelo, Administrative Assistant
DAT21 December 16, 1960
SUL;JI:CTi Airport Managethent Contract
This report is an assessment of the performance of Aviation, and Transportation Consultants based upon the performance revive `,of
r
December 11, 1980 for the period January 10 1994 to December iii`
1980. The performance review was conducted by a committee of ~`ca
Airport Members and the City staff, The members of the Airport
Board appointed to the review incm~y committee eas the econtract i
Moorehead and Gene Wright. }
administrator I represented the City staff during the review.
Generally, WC performance during the previous year has bon
fully satisfactory. In many instancas ATC. has perfor®ed, abaje
expectancy and in one aroa their performance was only genoeilly
satisfactory and needs sane improvement.
The following is a brief synopsis of the committees comments on
each of the key effeetivness areas which formed the basis for
the evaluation.
1. Airport Develo cement
in this key effectiveness area AT, performance was rated as "
fully satisfactory, ATC has done a superior` job in the
promotion of business expansion at the airport and in the
negotiation of airport lease agreements..
seeking new tenonts for the airport and has patfooAd
excellently given the limited resources at the airport. .On
the negative aide, ATC has performed poorly regardin4 the
enforcement of stffndards of consttueticn and recommahdatldna {
regarding facilliA es to be constructed' by leaseholders. I
significant improvement is expeoted on this factor,
2. operations and__lSerlnt~ ena_ nre
In this area ATE, performance has been rated as superior as
they have perfoctned above axpectanoy in almost Al factors., ;
programs have been implemented at the
now maintenance
_
Many n
04
JY N
•
I
I
l
Chris Hartung
Page Two
December 16, 1980
airport which were previoucly nonexistent. The erosion
control program ano crack seal programs, to name but two,
have played an important role in the increased safety at the
airport. ATC should be commended for their efforts in this
area.
3. Intergovernmental Relations
ATC'a performance in this area has been rated fully
satisfactory to above expectancy. The efforts of ATC in
regard to the City's relationship' with the Federal Aviation €
Administration and the Texas Aeronautics Commission have
been quite successful. The technical assistance provided byy
ATC on the Overlay Project Grant contributed nearly $14,Obd
in cost savings for the project, f. ,
4. Public Relations 1
In this area ATC performance has boon rated as above
expectancy. ATC has performed admirably as host a'Kd
representative of the City for users of the airport. OC
has developed and implemented an exeellant public relatiblit
program designed to promote the general interest of t
city, the airport, and local government, in addition, A11C
has done an outstanding job in its contribution to 'a
positive public iinsga of the airport and to the City
organization as a whole.
5, Administrative Reporting
in this area ATE. performance was rated as slightly below
average and sometimes erratic, While doing A superior job
of keeping the immediate supervision and Airport Board
informed on major problems ATC has not 'performed well in
regards to providing timely and concise reports an major 4
projects. Additionally, ATC has not responded well to 3{
requests for information without the need for follow-up, 1
Substantial improvement in this area is needed. I
6. General Administrative Activities
In this area ATC performance was rated slightly above fully
satisfactory, ATC has performed outstandingly in relation
to the daily inventory of aircraft on the airport and daily
logs of airport operations, Generally ATC aseistani;e with
budget related activities has been fully sattafaotoiy with
} some additional improvement needed - in the area of
i sensitivity to budget constraints, In addition, it !t
necessary that ATC better their efforts toward the
development of a comprehensive program of airport property
acquisition# right of way, and land use at the airport,
1
Now]
4
..»tsarri.kr9Y ty-p,J"Y, ...Y.^.T$4H.tn'Y'Yt?'1~+'It~d, Nelh!~.Q.«+8;rk!r:,., .+.r •'h9 "4s :.,.-e;<roy ,.,..,,i, i
Chris Hartung
Page Three
December 16, 1980
General Comments
In the vast majority of the key effectiveness areas Aw has
performed very well As noted, in some key effectiveness areas
Am has performed above expectancy un4er the oircumstanoes+ In
one area ATC performance was below standard, and needed
t improvements should be made in that area, I` have meet with
representatives of ATC to discuss the strengths and weaknesses
of their performance and certain improvements will be made
+ during the upcomi-.ig year in those weak areas.
on the basis of this review t would recommend that the contract rtN
be extended for the additional two year period, I feel that the
services we receive for the contract amount of $160600 annually is in the best interest of the City of Denton, 11 f '
Ageo
I ,
~ r' I •,n
i
JI
5 l
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
The Airport Management Contract between the City of Denton I
and Aviation and Transportation Consultants requires that the City'
evaluate the worth of the management services provided after the
contract has been in effect for a period of one year. Based on the
results of this evaluation$ the City nay elect to terminate the
contract or continue it for an additional two liar period, in S
addition, the City's policy on performance evaluation and
productivity improvement requires that the evaluation results' be
;provided to ATC for their ,review, In this mannero the City' and ATC
will attempt to improve on the management services provided by ATC.
The contract will be evaluated by a committee, comic ised.'of
Airport Board Members and City Staff and then presented to the
Air oft Board for their consideration. The Airport Board will
review the evaluation results and present them to the City Council
with a recommendation on whether or not to extend the contract,
The contract will be evaluated on the basis of criteria
contained in the contract as recommended by a subcommittee ot.'fhe
Airport Advisory Board, The criterion will be refined by the Staff
in order that adequate performance measures can be made to reflect
the actual worth of the contract to the. City of Denton. In
addition$ this evaluation committee has developed a list of
performance measures to be applied to the evaluation criteria.
The contract will be evaluated on the basis of six key
j effectiveness areas. The key effectiveness areas selected are as
follows,
Is Airport Development
2. Operations and Maintenance
3, intergovernmental Relations
4. Public Relations
5. Administrative Reporting
6, General Administrative Activities
Each key effectiveness area is supported by several factors which
l contribute to the overall performance in that area. The factors for
each area are as followsi
y
t
larformance Evaluation/Airport Management Contract
December 10, 1980
Page Two
KEY EFFECTIVENESS'AREA3
I. AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT
A) Promotes business expansion at the airportj seeks
now tenants and users of the facilities.
8) Seeks and negotiated leases on all property within i'
t the confines of the airport.
C) Studies and makes recommendations for optimum and
maximum use of airport properties.
D) Enforces standards of conatruotion and makes
recommendations regarding facilities to be erected
by leaseholders.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
A) Providas a full time airport manager, including 11
hour emergency coverage.
8) Provides for the safe, efficient, and continuous
operation of the airport and airport faoilities.
C) Established and enforces saf!ty and security
procedures and operational prb~edures and rules
for the airport.
D) Supervises and coordinates maintenance of all
j airport properties.
E) Makes recommendations regarding needed changes and
operational guidelines.
F) Enforces and regulates the use of the grounds and
i facilities of the airport.
0) Formulates policies and plans governing
operational and maintenance functions at the
airport,
M) Provides supervision for the comprehensive {
maintenance services for all facilities' operated
by the airport.
i) Supervises and coordinates the removal of airurr.ft
E obstructing runways.
J) Advises the City and the FAA of any malfunction at
the airport which would affect its operation.
s.
Mal
9[.an a ,Nw;.. 4a, .f',.• .rt J xY: h,_.r
Performance ;valuation/Airport Management Contract
December 10, 1980
Page Three
X) Plans coordinates, and directs any construction
activity or engineering work related to
maintenance or construction work at the airport,
L) Develops and administers a self-lnspectton program
in accordance with federal requirements for
certification.
III. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS L
A) Coordinates City and airport activities with the.
FAA and the TAC on various aspects of airport
management,
8) Prepares all required local, state, and federal ;
reports'relating to the operation of the airport.
C) Assists in the seeking of and recommending federal
and state airport grante, .
r.
D) Technical assistance in the coordination*Ad
management of TAC and FAA grants to the laity of
Denton,
E) Works with the various law enforcement agencies$
including the United States Custom Office, brug
Enforcement Administration, and. City and County
police departments on drug related items,
F) Establishes work procedures and conducts
negotiations with agents of utility And other
compan iee.,
IV, PUBLIC RELATIONS
A) Acts as host and representative of the City of I
Denton for users of the airport.
B) Provides an information service for transient
pilots,
C) Developes and implements public relations policies
to promote the general interest of local
government, the airport, and the general public,
D) Provides timely and appropriate response to
citizen complaints regarding the airport,
E) Skill, tact and effectiveness of relations with
co-workers and oitizens, Maintains open rapport
and contributes to harmonious and productive
working atmosphere.
Performance Evaluation/Airport Management Contract
December 10, 1980
Page Four
P) Contributes to a positive ublio image of the
airport and to the City organisation An a whole,
V, ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTING
R
A) Keaps Supervisor and Airport Board informed of
y major problems as they arise,
B) Provides timely and concise reports on major
projects,
C) Develop$ and implements routine repottIng
procedures for daily program activities;
w~
D) Responds to request for information without need
for follow-up,
Y,
via GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIV1,0IES
A) Plans, coordinates and approves any airshows or
other special activities,
B) MaintALAX a daily inventory of aircraft on the
airport.
C) assists in the preparation of the annual budget
for submission to the City Manager,
f D) Sensitive to and attempts to adhere to budget.
E) Collects and remits a-o the City all fees from
leasing services and`op%ration of the airport, its
land and facilities,
r
F) Directs loxt aircraft searches as necessary.
i G) Developq and administers a comprehensive program
of airport property acquisition, rights of way,
and rental land and provides studies and
recommendations concerning airport real estate #
Activities. f
i
r
ago
+l.. r„-i.,n •~.'"..:e..rp..e',{Y `Y:v e+,n mv?..~ri r,rr.o}:,4.. ~ o
Performance Evaluation/Airport Managemtnt Contract
December 10, 1980
Page Five t
The Perforeasureamance~ Evaluation will be based on the folloainq
Performance M
A
F
le Unsatisfactoryi significant improvemegt re0fredl ,
unacceptable performance on the factor.
r 2, Generally satiafactoryl tot fully up to standards
4
development or other action needed, sometimes erratic i i
performance,
3e Fully sstisfactorys normal expectance perfofmanoe~
measure satisfe4tory on the fsatoc denoted by the {4
standard of performance.
e, Above expeetanoyyI performance consistently i4cesds i
standardot eontrlbutlan is above expectancy ovcrall,` h
S. Excellent and Outstanding Performances ,
of unusually high quality partormah6i' is
t contribution is unique;ind
is easily and clearly identified and accepted as euoh.
V
}
I
R~
~ ly r
} cp.:
II
fr
j
a
PERFORMANCE EVALUATYON
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
Appraisal Date December 11, 1980
Appraisal Period Covereds FROM 1 January 1980 TO 11 December 1980
Key Effectiveness Area i. AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT
FA R
h
1 ~ 1
irosoter business expansion at the alrportt seeks
new tenants and usots oj the facilities. X
sl leeks And negotiates lures an all peopetty vithln
the Confines of the sirpect, X
C) studies and makes reeosorsndations lot eptisum and
saxlsus use of airport properties.
Df lnfereaa Standards
eseesseadatie of Censtruellen and sakes
es Ngatdlnq (aelllties to be ereeted X
by leaaeheldets. X
I
~ 1 r
T A RE 1
AVERA E ORE + X N, N Ntun ar o
factors 22
■ 3.00
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (Circle appropriate word)
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE AVERAGE
SUPERIOR OUTSTANDING
Performance Moasuresi
1
Un•
atiKfactorpt significant lm
performance on this factor, provement required) Unacceptable
Z, ~nerally satisfactory, Not fuliv up to standard
Devsiopment or
other action needed) Sometimes erratic performance,
3• fully satisfactory) Normal expectano
satisfactorily on this factor, y Performance, Measures
40 Above expectanopt Performance consistently exceeds standards)
Contribution to above expectancy over&ll.
S, Lxcellsnt and Outstanding performance, Performance is of
unuauall high quality) Contribution is unique and is easily and
r Clearly identified and accepted as such,
• , paw
"k"l
c
k
i
1 1 1
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
Appraisal Date December ll, 1980
Appraisal Period Coveredt FROM 1 January 1980 TO 11 December 1980
Ray Effectiveness Area 11. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
FACTOR 4 ~
{
A) provides a full time airport manages, including 71
hour eeergeney coverage, x
a) Provides for the safe, efficient, and continuous
Operation of the airport .nd airport facilities, X
C) Establishes and en[oreeo safety and security
rocedures and operational proetdures and rules X
1419 the airport.
D) Supervises and coordinates maintenance of all u.
airpest propertias. X
E) Nakao teeemmendatlons regarding needed changes and
Operational quidelinas, X
t) Eaforeas and requiatea the use
Of
the grounds and
laeillties of the airport. X
o) teraulats& policies and plans governing X
epetational and maintenance functions at the
a rpast.
11 provides supervision for the eerprehenetve X
malotsnsnco serviean fos ♦11 facilities operated }
f by tk alspoet.
A RE %
AVERA E SCORE (W)zLrX + , N Num er of
N factors
OVZRALL PERFORMANCE (Circle appropriate word)
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE AVERAGE SUPERIOR OUTSTANDING
Performance Measuresr
1. Unsatlifectoryj Significant i
performance on this factor, raprcvement requited) unacceptable i
2, Generally satisfactory( Not fully u to standard) Det,elo ant or
other action needed) Sometimes a atic performance.
34 fully satisfactory) Normil expet,ancy performance) Measures
satisfactorily on this factor,
e, Above 'expectancy) Performance consistently exceeds standards)
I Contribution is above expo tansy overall.
S, Excellent and Outstanding performance) Performance is of
unuslly high quality) Contribution is unique and is easily and
clearly dentilied and accepted as such,
1
i
,ti
:>1:..1 .9114 Ay ..f T:A <
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
Appraisal Date December 11, 1480
Appraisal Period Covered FROM i ,entinry iaAQ TO is nae-ombiar 1gAn
Key Effectiveness Area II, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE- CONTINUED
FACTOR 1 2 3 4 5
1 1 dupeevises and coordinates the removal of aircraft X
obstructing runways,
J) Advised the City and the rAA of any malfunction at x "
the airport which would affect its operation,
a) plans, ecordinaees, and directs any construction x
activity or engineering work related to
maintenance or construction work at the eirpottd
L) Cevvleps and administers a self-Inspection program x
In aeeordanes with federal requirements tot
f certillaatioe. {
1
I
I
49
A~ISRAGE SCORE x x N, N ■ Number o d9
factors M 4.08
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (Circle appropriate word)
I'
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE AVERAGE SUPERIOR OUTSTANniNt1 f
Performance Measurer ej
la Unsatisfactory) Significant improvement required Gnacieptabii
} ppeerformance an this factor.
2. Generally satitfactoryi Not fully up to stahdardi Develo oa nt or
ethar action neededl sometimes erratic performance
3a sully satisfeetoryl Normal expectancy performance] Messures
satisfactorfly'on this factor,
4: Above expeetancyt performance consistently exceeds standards
Contribution is Above expectancy overall,
5a Excellent and Outstanding performar,rai Performance it of
unutuiliy high qu,lityl Contribution It Unique and is Wily and
clearly Identified and accepted as such,
g;
{
I
i
I
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
Appraisal Date na pmh r 11. 1980
Appraisal Period Covered: FROM 1 January 1980 TO 11 December 1980
Key Effectiveness Area III. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
R
A) Coordinates City and airport activitits with the
tAA and the TAC on various aspects at` airport X
Management.
el Fesparee all required local, states and tedoral X ,
reports relating to the operation of the airport.
C) Assists In the -teking of and recommending .Vderal
and stab airport grants X
DI Assists in tM Coordination and Management at TAC X
and FAA grento to the City at Denton,
Norbs with the various law entorcement agenctes. X
Including the United State$ Custu Office, Drug
rntorcement Adminlstrationi and City sad County
police departments on drug related itess,
P) eetabltehes work procedures and condaats
eeietiations with agents of utility and other X
3 F
1
T T RE (1) Wd
AAVERAGIC RE X Nt N + Number of 22
3. b7. 1
factors
OVERALL, PERFORMANCE (Circle appropriate word)
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE AVERAGE SUPERIOR OUTSTANDING }
Performance Mfaasuresr
1, Unsatisfactory Significant 'lsnprovement required] Unacceptable
performance on this. factors
- 3, Generally satlsfactutyl Not fully up to standards Development or
other action needed; Sometimes erratic performance.
1, fully satisfactory= Normal expectancy performance) Measures
satisfactorily on this factor,
4, Above- expectancyl Performance consistently exceeds standards)
Contribution is above expectancy overall.
S• Excellent and Outstanding performance) Performance is Of
unusually high quality( Contribution is unique snd is easily and
clearly identified and accepted so such.
r,
.e mqy>• au 6`x•rz"Y .V .t,.11 .V. r.., .
' I
PERFORMANCE EVALUATICN
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
Appraisal Date December 11, 1980
Appraisal Period Covered) FROM I January 1980 TO 11 December 1980
Key Effectiveness Area IV. PUBLIC RELATIONS
FACTOR 4
ti) Acts as host and rspreeentative of the City of
Denton for Users of the airport. X
a it peovidea an information service for transient X
pilots.
C) Dwelepes and implements public relations policies
to promote the general interest of LOCAL X j2
government, the airport, and the genetal publte. '
m) provides timely and approppriats responea to
citisan complainte regarding kAa airport. X
t) $kill, tact and affectlveneas of relations with
to-vorkers and citisens. Maintains open rapport
and eontribupea to harmonious and productive X
working stmeaphere.
N Contributes to A positive public image a' the
airport and to the City erganiaatien as a vheie. $
"
A RE (k) 94
AVERAGE ORE ( Nt N is Neun er of 94
■ 4.00
factors
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (Circle appropriate word)
{ UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE AVERAGE SUPERIOR OUTSTANDING i
Performance Measuras:
1. Unsatislactoryi Significant improvement required) Unacceptable
performance on this factor. I 1
2. Generally satisfactoryi Nit fully up to standard? Development or {
other action needed) Sometimes erratic performance,
3, fully satisfactory; Normal expectancy performance) Measures i
satisfactorily on this factor,
4, Above expectanoyj_ Performance consistently exceeds standards i
Contribution is above expectancy overall.
! S. Excellent and Outstanding performanCet Performance is of
j unusually high qualityi Contribution is unique and is eaally and
clearly identified and accepted as such,
i
I I
r~. s Al
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
Appraisal'Date December 11, 1980
Appraisal Period COVeredr FROM 1 JranuaF lY 980 TO 11 December 1980
Rey Effectiveness Area V. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTING
FA T R
4 5
R
Al taoP$ suppervisor and Airport Beard tnleraad of
major problame as thor aeUe. x
pf Provides timely and conalsa reports on major
projocts, x
Cf Oavelopd and GPlemants routine eeportlny
preeaduees for daily Program activities,
fo
D? for toll to . 49t tot information without rtaed x
for lollevwp x
~JJ
A RE
AVERAGE RE ( a Y N, N ■ Nam et o
factors = ■ 2.75
OVERALL PEA!'ORMANCE (Circle appropriate wordy
CNACC3PTABLE ACCEPTABLE AV:;kAGE SUPLrRIOR OUTSTANDING 1
Performance Measures,
14 Unsatisfactory) Significant improvement required) t7nacceptae,le
performance on this factor.
2, Generally Satisfactory, Not fully up to standsrd)'Cevjlopment or
other Action nodded) Sometimes erratic performance,
34 Fully satisfactory) Normal expectancy performance') Measures
satisfactorily on this factor, I
$ 4, Above' expectancy) Performance consistently exceeds standards
Contrlbution is above axpectanoy overall, )
S• Excellent and Outstanding performance) performance is of
unusually high quaiity~ Contribution is unique and is easily and
clearly identified and accepted as such,
1
y
'F
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
Appraisal Date _December 11, 1980
Appraisal Period Covered: FROM Januar 1980 f
TO 11 December 1980
Rey Effectiveness Area I
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES II
F R i
A) plans# coordinates and aPPtevae any altshews or
other speetal activities, X I
s) a daily
airport. lnventoq of aircraft on the I
X
C) Assist$ in the
for eubmiseloa !epreparation of the annual budget'
the Clty Man' t
X
o) sensitive to and attampta to adAet• to budget.
s) collects and remits to the city all fats from X
leasing services and operation of the ai
land and facilities, rport, Its X
F) cited U lost strer+tt selrebta at necessary.
a) Develops end administets a comprehensive X
an ~trpeta properlY c ulstlton, rights ofrowaY
a
and menial land provides studies ins X
seee,4046datlons Concerning airport
eetivltles. to+1 estate
RE
VER)1 E SC RE k + N, N um 2
or o
!scrota -7 . 3.29
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (Circle appropriate word)
UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE AVERAGE SUPERIOR OUTSTANDING
Performance M*Asurea:
It Unsatisfaetoryl Significant improvement required) Unacceptable
ppeerformance on this factor.
Sl Cetnerally satiafactory) Not tAndard
Or
other action needed) ScUtimsfully s *rra up P to atAMdArdj ptrm;nco) measures
c Performance
30 fully tatisfactoryl Norulal expectan
cy
satisfactorily on this factoro performa
1. Above ex ectano Performance consiste.lti
Contribution is &boy* expectancy overall, y 'ic'ed' e~andarda)
6. Excellent and Outstandin
unusually qaiityI Contributionmiscuniq a and to ceasilay and
clearly tdehighrltifieud and accepted as such.
r
I
l
KEY EFFECTIVENESS AREA AVERAGE SCORE
i
I. Airport Development 3.0
ii. Operationa and Maintenance 4.08
ill. Intergovernmental Relations 3.67
1
4.0
IV. Public Relations .
V. Administrative Reporting 2.75
i VI. Cneral Administration 3.29
Activities
TOTAL SCORE 20.79
AVERAGE SCORE X Y 6 3.47
i
1 rl .
L
a5,i
.r r
A ;IX
r y1
I
,
,
j
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
December 9, 1980
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council at
' 7100 p.m., Tuesday, December 9, 1980 in the Council Chambers
of the Municipal Building at which the following items of
business will be discussed.
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON ,
CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC
UTILITIES BOARD,;.
I • i
Receive a report from Management and Research
Consultants on electric rates and PURPA compliance.
MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL `n
11 Appearance by Robert L. Pearce relstita to the
H storic Landmark Ordinanoe.
2, Approval of a proposed Street Bond Program and
preliminary election date.
3. Receive a report on the Utility Easement Policy in
relation to Cable TV installations in Southridge.
4. Executive seeeionr
A, Legal Matters - Under Sao, 2(e), Art, 6252-0 V, A. T. S.
B. R:al Estate - Under Sec. 2(E), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.9.
C, Personnel - Under gee. 2(g), Art, 6252.17 E
ti
D. Board Appointments - Under 9eo. 2(q), Art.
6252-17 V.A.T.e,
51 Board Appointments
t
r
a.,
..A T l 4 P.' y
Y
V y♦
,
,
e
.f
i
December 9, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 11
SUBJECTI
Receive Electric Rate Study Report from Management and
Research Consultants.
SUMMARY i
i Management and Research Consultants, (MARC), will present
their Electric Rate Study report to the joint meeting of the
Council and Public Utilities Board. MARC has alto developed
! a Public Utility Regulatory Policies' Act (PURPA) Compliance
Manual which discusses Denton's present and future
responsibillttes regarding PURPA and discusses actions that
will be required for Denton to meet the Federal Government's
PURPA regulations when Denton becomes subject to such j
regulations in 1982.
After review and comment on the Electric Rate Study by the
Council and Public Utilities Board# a public heartngi. In
accordance with PURPA regulations, will be held by the Board
` to receive input of a technical and rate design; netut'o.
After issues are rosolved that result from this PURPA fohial
hearing, the rates will be submitted to the Council by the
public Utilities Board, The Council will then have a genital
public hearing and adoption of rates will be appropriate
f thereafter.
Significant issues in the Electric Rate Study Ares
1, No significant increase in electric revenwis is i
p required at this other than
required to egene ate recovery Dontonhs I
I increasing co
electricity.
2, The Study period was from 1980 through 1985 With rates
designed around the initial year% of the Study. Since
rates that TMPA will charge the City •.of Denton for
power beginning in late 1982 may affe4t Denton's rate
structure, a modification of these rates may be
required in late 19828
I ' 3. Declining block rates have been eliminated. All
residential customers pay the same cost pet XWH during
the summer months irregardless of use.
I
7" c: 11
r
{
4. A summer-winter rate differential of 3/100 per KWH was
established to reflect the increased cost of additional
generation# transmission and distribution costs that
result from high summer usage.
5. The fuel adjustment charge has been removed and
replaced with an energy coat adjustment. The energy
coat adjustment will be charged only for energy colts
in excess of 30 per M.
61 Residential customers with electric heating wl
receive electricity in excess of° 1000 KVB used duiing
the winter months of December, January and February for
one-half cent per KWIH less than comparable summer ratio ;
and for 2/100 per KWH lose than being charged to
non-eleotrio heating customers.
ACTION UQUIREDt
# No action required at this time, other than comments relating
to the Electric Rate Study.
STAFF RECOMMUDATIONs
The Staff has no recommendation at this time.
"
ATTACHMENTS Elaotrio Rate Study f
PURPA Compliance Manual
y:
.s
C
v i.
' J
r
w ~Lw
1 14
h
~ i
~ i
it
1
f r,
t
IT
CITY OF DMON '
MEMORANDUM
Tpe Mayor and Members of the City Council i
FF.OMI 8111 Angelo, Administrative Assistant I
i
DATEs December 4, 1980 d'
' r 809JECTs Agenda Item 62, Appearance by ROber: Pearce
This item was placed on the Agenda at the request of
Mr. Robert 'Pearce and will involve discussion on the Historic 3r'
Landmark Ordinance. Mr. Pearce claims that section 20A-11 of
the ordinance is unconstitutional in light of recent aupreee
Court rulings. In addition, Mr. Pearce will request that the
Council repeal this ordinance in favor of 'a lest restrictive 1 rr'
ordinance.'
I have included for your review a copy of the F l
Historic Landmark Ordinance. The pa►;icular section in
question appears on pages 145 through is of the ordinance.
Mkt
e ,
nge o
bA/ap
Enclosure 5462A
Eytf.
!tu 1 445 } I
Y 4f 9~ 4
r ill $R
ar
1
J i..... i..♦ a .
x t,
f
Y
x '
r , V.ISq.Ic
1
AN OU INANCI AMENDING APPENDIX S OF TF1 CDD= OF ^ADI::.kNCE3, THS
COMMEMSII'2 MUSIC ORDIN%NCE OF TY.E CITY Of DENTON 'IUS
tv ADDING to A.tiPENDIX b A N8e' ARTICLE •SA E\TtTL37 "A.RT4CLI '81
HISTORIC LA:tiuARK PR:SEF.1•ATIO."'s MINING THE OU HISTOR1C
Lri0 'ttyt; CREATING A H13TORIC LA.MDMAIa' CIISSION AND PROVIDING
11 POI ITS POMEZS ASO 111111SIIILITF; PROI' INO FOR TH* D=SIGNt•
TION OF HISTORIC LMDbIAPXS 1Y Tnt CIT1• AND ESTADLISItING
CRITERIA FOR USE_ IN DMILMINING HISTORIC LArND.Wt DESIGNATIONS.
ANTISG THE AV.',IR MOM N'0 DEMOLITION OR RDIMIAL 01
HISTORICAL LINDMARKSi bEFININO THY POI'-MRS AND AUrd AITY OF TH
PLANNING AND CO\INO COkNISSION GYER HI TOAIC LAd YS A~D OF
THS C1TY COUNCItl PRO1'1DtNG THAT HIS10R C LANp. DSSIGNATION3
SHALL NOT AFFECt PRESE\t t4N1N'G USES; PII:YDINR A PENALTY.
ylMEAS, the City of Denton, Texas his a history and a r
Aerltale unique and different from any other City in Texas
vhich is worthy ai civic pride and preserretior.; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recoSni:e! its reiponaibility to
preserve end protect places and irul in the City of historical
and cultural importance ani itsnlticante for the genoril
3
welfare of the comet unity;
NOV TH~ EPOIIS, TH! COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, t
HERESY 6RD1INS!
SICTION I.
i
Appendix D of the Code of Ordtea-eei of the City of Denton,
Tolls, the Coerorehenllvi toning ordinance at the City of
Denton, is hereby emonded by adding to Appendix b e Mw Article
W to herlefror road to followil
ARTICLE 11A HISTORIC LMDMARK PRESERYA1ION.
Section 11A•1, "HISTORIC LANDMARK" CIP14ED
As used in this article, the term "historic landmark" shall
F mean any building, structure, site, district, erss, or lead of
Ardhitocturai, historical, archeeolosical or cuiturai
i
importance of velue, which the City Council determines Shell it
protected, enhanced, and preserved in the interest of the
culture, prosperity, education and Zenaral welfare of the
people.
i f
Section SSA•1. DECLAAATION OF POLICY.
The city council hereby finds And declares ss a roaster :f
p0lit policy that the ;rotes ion, enhsneemen:, pr ua:vatlat
St :i
and use of historic landmarks is a pOii: no:essitr and is
r" uired in the interest of the culture, prosperit}•, edu:ation
and Senerel w#11914 of the people, the purposes of this
:hapte: are:
CA) To protect, enhance and perpetuate historic landmarks
which represent or reflect distinctive and important elements
3 of the city's and state's architectural, archaeologitrl,
cultural, Societe economic, athnic and political history and to
develop appropriate sitting* for sucl plates. "
(b) To safeguard the city's historic and cultural I
heritage, as embodied and reflected in such historic landmarks
by appropriate regulations. i
fa) To stabilite and improve property values in Such II
locstiens. I
fd} To foster civic pride in the beauty and secomplish•
Monts of the pose,
(e) To protect and enhance the city's attractions to
tourist; and visitors and provide incidental support and 111
stimulus to business and industry,
t
ff) to strengthen the economy of the city,
tg) To prom-its the use at hiataria landmarks for the
culturs, prosperity, adutation, and general welfare of the
people of the city and visitors of the city. i
Section HAIL HI"4 AN WDWKS•DISIUATIOh.
The city council may doilpits buildings, structures,
sites, listrfgts, still and leads in the. City is historic
i
'andaatks and drone, amand and drlih Ufa the boundaries
thereat, The suffix "FT' shall indicate the toning desixnstion
of abase buildings, itruatursa, sifts, distridta, sr us and
lands which the city council designate is historic landmarks,
Such dealtastloa shall be in addition to any other use
designation established in the comprehensive toning ordinance.
The toning nip shall relied the designation of a hieterf:
landmark by the lettef "H" as a suffix to inn other use {
_l
77
1 ,
{
designation established under :he coeprehenstre toning
ordinance.
Sea:lOn IAA•4. SAMI-CRITIRIA TO /E USED IN DESIGNATIONS,
In paking Such deJlgnations t1 Jet forth in Section IIA•!, /
i he Clty eeuncil shill consider, but shall no be limited to,
one or Mora of the following crlteriil
(a) Character, interest or value to part of the do4lep• " j
Mont, heritage of Cultural characteristics of th'e City- of
Denton, Stets of Texas, or the United States, f"
(b) Recognition is a recorded Texas historic landoark, a
national histerie landmork, or entered into the National
Reglator of Historic PlaooJ,
(a) bsbodisent of distinguishing characteristics of an {
architectural type Of specisen, l
(d) Identification as the work of an architect or master {
builder whose individual work has lnfluenced the devolopsent of
the cite.
(e) bbodleent of elements of architectural destjn,
detsll, materials or eraftneanship which represent a
signillaant architectural innovation. I
(f) Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or
areas xhieh its eligible for preservation. according to a plan
based on orchitocturai, historic or cultural motif,
i
(g) Portrayal of the eavirenmont of a group of people In i
! an area at history eharactarlted by a distinctive irehitaevitral
Jt~~11,
(h) Archaeological value In that it has produced at can be
expected eo produce data Affecting theories of historic or
{ prehistoric Interest
(1) gxesplifieAtion of the cultural, econanit, social,
ethnla ar hlstoriesl heritage of the sit}•, fate or United
Ij Stites,
x 1
PAG) f
o, ,
M1
I
i
fI. Locaa or. as the site of
1 sfanift:ant historic ok.oftt'
(L) Identi!1:1410n %-ith a person or persans who
air.lfi:antly contributed to the culture and devilopmen: of the
ctt!•, State of United Settle,
(1) A bulldinl or structure that because of its location
4 4
his become of value to a nei/hborhood, community trot, or the
' e1t
{m} Value is in aspect of community iontiment or public
pride.
t
Section IIA•14 HISTORIC LA.1'DtURX COlMISSION-CAEATID.
(a) There is herob± created ati commission to be known to
the Historic Landmark Commission of the City of Denton, here. i5l
hatter gelled the "landmark conmiseian," composed of 'nine
members appointed by the city council. The landmark eogriision
chill Include at least one reprosontetlre from lath of the
following offiallations or professional
F1) Denton County Historical Commission,
(1) The Denton County Bar Assoclatlon,
(S) An Architect,
(e) A Certified public tiecauntant,
(1) An owner of rail property in the City,
i {b) the other members of the landmark tommisolon shall be
I,
appointed from such other individuals and orlinilatlono is the
city council mar in its distrition wish to consult or cansldorl
provided thec no one business or professional intorest shall
constitute a majority membership et the commission.
C) 1'
( limber) of
the landmark eosmtu(an shall be s
ppetntad
far two yell taros, except that the etittnol representatives
from the fire fields of arperilse ahtll Jim for a term of two
years, and all other arlptaal members of the landmark
ee22111ion shell be appointed for a aria year tors, thereafter
all metibera of oho landmark eaausisstan shall be appointed tar
two ,year terms, Vacancies in an unexpired tats shall be !!lied
fy the city eaun4il for the remainder of the tors,
PA0! e
a;
.,F
\i }ail ~Q.
I
. 1
td) In addition to tht nine members appointed by :he ci:y
eoun:il, :he follovinr persons or :heir designates shod sit on
the Landmark commission to ex of!icia cabersr
1. The Director of planning of the City of Dontoo.
1. The building Official o! the City of Denton,
The Chalrman of :he Denton County Historical
Commission .
(e) Nane of the is officio sabers 0411 have voting
power, but shall assist the Witter% commission in Its ratious
functions.
a,
(f) The landmark commission shall mote as often as
j`
necessary to dispose of the business of the eommisslon'or upon
call by the commission chairman or upon petition of a simple
maletity of commission members, live mothers present shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and ail
i
issues shall be decided by a majority of these members present i
and voting, exempt that is those inatanees where drily a quorum r
of five is present at a meeting, all iesust shall be decided by
at lease four affltmative Veta. The commission shell adopt
appropriate rules and regulations for the cooduet of its
business and the election of its chairman and other officers.
The minutes of each meeting shall be filed In the office of the y
city wratary.
.
(g) The city attorney shall be the legal adviser for the
Historic Landmark emission.
(h) the fact that one or more reproeentatim from the a
five fields of expeftice may not it any given point be a member
of the landmark eemmtssien, for whatever reason or reasons,
shall not affect the validity of any decision or act of the
eemmissien.
k ieeslon =l,t,d, JAMMUNCTION,
(a) The landmark commission shall thereughly familiariea
Itself with buildings, struoturee, sites, districts, asses and
lands within the city which may be eligiblt for designation as
i
}.r
i
F77
1
I
A
histo- l: 1 and%' and shill p:scare in historl: landaari:
preservation plan, hertinafter referred to to the "p:elerCstion
plan," which shalit
ll) Establish c:ito:it to be used in determining
t whether certain buildings, structures, sites, districts, amts,
leads and other objects should be desisnatid as historic
landmarks
(1) Establish luidollnes to be used in determinstion
of whether to grant or deny certificates of appropriateness and
certificate of demolition of removal.
(1) formulate a program for private and public action
which will state the role of various clay agencles in
preservation of historic lsndmar&e.
li
(4) $ujgeat touress of funds for preservation and
restoration` activities and acquisitions, to include federal
source, state sources, private and foundation sou:eel, to will
as municipal souree,
(1) !Recommend to the proper sganelst lacentives
designed to entourage historical preservation,
(b) The preservation plan shall be presented to the city
planning coamissien for consideration and retonsaendatlon to the
f city council for Inclusion in the comprohonsive plan of the
€f 1 city...
(c) The landmark coalition shell retommand to the city
4 planning eommiooion ordinances designating terrain bait
structures, sites, districts, Areu and lands it. the cis, it
historic landoarksl_ except that as property shall be included
in any proposed ordinance dtsllnating any property ae a
` historic landmark without the consent of the owner of the
I land, rho lar,dmar eossmisslon shell hold a public hfiring an
ail proposed ordinoncet and the owner of any land included In
j the proposed Ordinance shalt be given at lust test days written
+ maids Of the Public hearing,
a.°
f PAJS 1
f
i
1
{d; I! the lendcsrk ::c:lsslon lands :hs: 6uildinls,
s:ru:turu , titer, dir:ricts, ltndt or areas cannot he
i
p;esc wd +ithou, acquisl:ion, :he landrs;k commission ms4
riconmend to the alt>• council that the fee or a lesser in:eru : '
of the property in quit tIat be acquirsd by pift, devise,
purchase, sminant domain or otherwise, pursuant to the city
darter tad state and federal law,
(e) h'here there are conditions under which the required
preservation of a historic landmark would cause undue hardship
on the owner or owners, use district changes may be reeammended
by the landmark commission,
(f) The designation of a historic landmark may be amended
or removed using the same procedure
pravlded, In this retitle
for the original designation,
(g) The landmark emission shell provide information and
counseling to owners of desIstated historic landmarks.
Section 31A•7. ACTION !Y THE CITY PLANNING C0411391 ON.
(a) The 'city planning Conmission shall hold pvblie
hearings as provided for to Article 1011!, Yernon's Annotated
Texas 9titutas, to consider any historical landmark designation
ordinance after receiving a reeamendation for the 'landmark
canI scion. The notices provided for in Article 10111 shall be
~
sent to all owners of property which is proposed for "N„
designation as well as co the adjoining property owners
specified In said Article,
(b) Within .thirty days After the hearing, the city
planning eoaelisian Shall tit forth fa wising its riaamM-
ditlon, including the findings of fact that constitute the
basis fir III digit IOno and shill tritnit its rnonondiaion
concerning the proposed ordinaries to the city council along
with tno reedmmendetion of the landmark commission,
I festion I9A•1, EECORDBI OP DIM AMN,
f Upoa psisafe of a histotte isndmith designation ordinaries,
by the clay Council, the atty secretary $hi l file a copy of
PADS
owl
4
the ordinance with City end Denton, County Ter. Assessors
together vith a notice bria!1+• stating the fact Of the
deslgnstion and shall send a copy of such notice the owner
or owners of the affected property by certified mall.
Section :,A•9. IXTBRIOR ALTIRATIONS ANT CNA SS•CERTIFICATA
OF APPROPRIATENESS ORDINARY REPAIR OR
NAINTIIN.INCE, APPEAL.
No person or entity shall construct, reconstruct, elter,
change, restore, remove or demolish any exterior architectural
feature of a designated historic landmark unless application be
made to the landmark commission for a eeetitieats of
1
appropriateness and such a certificate be granted. As used is
this article, the tarp "exterior architectural feature" shall
include bus not be limited to architectural style and general
If arrang"ent of such portion of the exterior of s structure as
4 is designed to be open to view from a public way.
(a) Procedure when building permit it rsquiredt
( (1) when applying for a bulldiag pirmit for the
exterior of a designated historic landmark, the sppllesnt shalt
submit two copies of all detallal plans, elevations, perspee•
tivia, specifications and other documents pertaining -to the
work to the building official, who shall forward such t
application to the commission chairman. Any applicant may
appear it a tejutar or special meeting of the landmark
F' commission before submitting in application and may consult
with said eosuaiseloa during the roviev of the permit ff
Application. 1
1) The iasdmark commission, upon ten days written
r
natiet to the applicant, shalt hold a hewing ,on the eppli•
cation. Upon reviov of the application, it the landearh
commission finds the proposed work of a nature which will not
sdveriely affect any tignlficsnt architacturst or historical
j tlatuts of the daiisnsted historic landmark, and is sppropriats
°E
ft PA31 1
.
w
J~C
1° n
■
i
f
i
and consistent with the spirit and pu:poses of this arti:la, it
shall foov&rd a certificate of appropriateness to the Suilding
o M :sal after the public hearing and the building official
shall so advise the applicant after the certificate is received.
(1) It the landmark ca=issioa finds that the pro-
posed wotk will adversely affect or destroy any significant
architectural or historical feature of the designated historic
landmark or is inappropriate or inconsistent with the spirit
and purposes of thia article, it shall notify the building
official that the application hoe been disapproved and shall
notify the applicant of the disapproval and of the changes In the application which are accessary to secure the approval of
the application
fi) if no action has been taken by the landmarl; 3
commission within sixty days of original receipt, by the
lon3mark Commission, a certificate of appropriateness shall be
doomed issued by the landmark tommiision, and the building
official shall to advise the applicant
(6) Vo things shall be bade it the application for any
building permit after issuance of a certifiato of appropriate-
Asia without reoubeittsl to the landmark Commission sad }
approval thereof in the same manner is provided above.
(6) After a decision is reachod by the landmark
commission dsnyint an application for a certificate of sppto•
pristeness, a regubmittll of application will not be accepted
for additional hearing within a twelve-month period from the
data of final decision except upon written request by the
applicant indicating chit there has boon a Change in conditions
III or that ell changes in the application is recommended by the
landmark toms lion have boon made,
(b) Ptodedurs when building permit is hot rsquitad:
(1) Those proposed exterior chanjoi sad al:orations
nag tsquirinl' a building permit shall be eubeit.ed in writing
PACE f
~;y'k6
j
i
1
directly to tht hiStoric landmark eomeiasion for a cortitcatt
of appropriateness which must be granted before such work an
be undertaken.
~ f
Applicant ehalt e;sbmit a Copy of all proposed alterations
and chaeles to the eommlasion. The application must
specifically describe the alteration or change proposed. Any '
Applicant may appear at a regular or special 21641111: at the
landmark commission before' submitting an application and may consult with Said eonisaton during the eerlsk of the
F appltcation. !I
(1) the landmark commission, upon ten days 'written
notice to the applicint, shall hold a hoarier an the
application. Upon review of the application, l( the landmark
i commission finds the proposed work of s nature which wil) not
adversely affect any significant architectural or historical
feature of a designated historic landmark and if appropriate
and consistent with the Spirit and purposes of this article, it
Shall forward a certificate of appropriateness to the applicant
within thirty days of the receipt of said application.
W if the landmark cosulosion finds that the Pro-
posed work will adwrsaly affect or destroy any significant
architectural or historical future of the dositnated histatic
landmark or is inappropriate or Inconsistent with the spltit !
And purpoaea of this article, it Shill netifv the applicant
within thirty days of receipt of said application that the
1 application has been disapproved and chid include In such
j notification the Charles neeaesary to figure approval of the
application,
1 (4) It tie action has been tskea by the landtiirk
commission within sixty days of the receipt of the application,
a eertiftcata of apprapriatanass shall be deemed issued by the
l udgirk Cemaisslan.
` )AGE .o
t r•
i
I
~f) No change Shall be rids in the application lo:
{
issuance o: a ee:%Mcaet o; approp:iatsness without
rtsubmittal to the landmark eommitsion and appra~al thereof in
the Same manner as provided above.
(6) Alter a decision is reached by the landmark j
eouilefea denying an eppliestion for cereifieste of f'
spproprlattntss, a rtsubmitral of application will not be
Steepled for additional hearing within c twelve month period
from the data of final decision eteePt upon written request by
the applicant indicating that there has been a change is
conditions or that all chantaS in tht application as
recommended by the landmark commission have bean made.
(c) ordinary repair or nslatenanasr
Ordinary repair or mainteranee which dots not involve
things$ In architectural and historic value, 14y1e or general
design is exempt from the provisions of this section,
(d) Appafl,
Any applicant at intoresttd
person aggrieved by a
ruling of the landmark costmission under the provisions of this
Section may, within thirty day) after the dat e! such ruling,
appeal to the city council.
Section IIA•10. HISTORIC LAKDMAKS-0 3MOLITIOR OR REMO1'AL,
(a) If An application it received for demolition at
removal of a 4611rated historic laadurho the building
official Shall lemediately forward the application to the
landmark o i l ilon, The landmark commission shall hold a
public hearing on the application within thirty days aftar the
sp}lieatien is initially filed with the building official, the
"
applicant Shall bb given ten days written notice of the
hitting, rho landmark commission shall eensieer the state of
repair of the buildin
i the reasonableness of the cost of
restoration at repair, the sxiSttng tnd,'ar potential
usefuints
S, including teanemic w tfuln a s of the building, she
purpossf behind preserving the atruaturt to a historic
) i
PAO11t
4
ti
awl
D'd war
F
I
i
landmark, the cha-actor of the aeighbarhood, And all ather
factors It finds appropriate. If :he land,;arf cocuission
determines that !r. the interest of prisgrrln; historical
values, the structure should no, be demolished or removed, it
shall notify the building official that the application has
bean disapproved, and the building official shall to advise the
applicant within live 'ays therefrom. If the landmark commis.
lion determines that the interest of
preserving historical
values will not be adversely affected by such demolishment or s"
removal or that the interest of preserving historical values
can best be served by the removal- of a structure to anotL$r
s,paclfIad location, It shell issue Its certificate of 114"
demolition or Its Certificate of removals as may be appro-
priate, to the building officials and the building othil sl
i
shall to adrete the applicant within five days therefrom.
r
(b; tt no Action has bean taken by the landmark comalstion
vi:hlD flit? days of original receipt by the landmark coaudte• 1 "
lion of the applications a certificate of demolition or a „
certificate of removal shall be deemed Issued by the landmark
commission and the building official shall so adrifa the
applicant.
(c) After a deeillon is ruched ey the lenlmark eemmisslon
deuving,an application for a cer afieate of demolition or a
certificate of removal, a rasubmi:tal of application to. fueh a S
certificate will riot be accepted for addl:ioaat hearing within {
a twelvs•month period from the dare of final derision.
(d) Amy applicant or the ovner of any priperty located
within three hundred test of any landmark who it iggrievid b~, a
ruling of the landmark castmifsion conesrning time landmark
under the provision of this fiction may, vithin sixty Jays
altar the ruling of the landisrh eonsitildn, appeal to the tit%
e*until, Following a public hissing to be held vithin thirty
T
days of the filing of a narl.co of such appeal with the eit!-
s sftrstary, the elty council may, by a simple ma)nrlty vote,
Nag 1;
WWI
I
I '
i
I ~
uphold ar overturn any ru:£ng of the landmt-kd £asfon aide
pu:susn% to this se:tior..
I Section :9A•11. PROMUR! FOR OSTAI,~ING 9UILDI\0 MXIT
1 mi,6UL FMIT, DD13LITI0\ FINIT AND AR
ALTERING THE EXTERIOR OF A SUILDINd OR
STRUCTURE DURING PSNOINCY OF CONSIDERATION
OF SUCH BUILDING OR STRUCTURE Al A HISTORIC
LAN. ARK OR AS PART OF A HIMATC LAND M..G.
(a) From and after the date on which the question of
whether or not any building, structure, or site within the City
should be designated as a historic landmark is pia a d upon the
agenda for any special or regular meeting of the landmark
commission, or from and after the date on which such agenda is '
posted in accordance with the provision of Article 6:51.17,
V,A.T.C.S., as amendef, or from and after the date that tie
landmark commission approvet or recommends a preservation plan ;
or any amendment of any existing preservation
plan which
. 3
embraces or in a udes the building, structure, or site within
the city, which:ver date first occurs, no building permit
allowing the construetlon, recedstruetlon, alteration, change,
restoration, removal or demolition of any exterior 1
y architectural feature of any building or structure than
existing Including or embraced in whole or in part within the
scope of such agends consideration or such preservation plan or t
F such amendment thereof, as the case may he and no pore h
f allowing the demolition or removal of all or any Bert of any
such building or structure may be issued by any official of the
city, nor l: no such permit to required, may any person or
entity construct, reconstruct, attar, change, restore, remove
or domalish any exterior architectural feature of any such
I building or structure, until the earli a t of the following
conditions have been mots
(1) A final and binding ctrtifita:t of appropriatt-
ness, removal or demolition, to may be sppropris a, has beer
issued by the landmark comm£ssionl
The landmark eommiseion falls to make s re:cmmsn-
datlon that some part or all of any such building or structure '
PAGE :l
,
1
t
r
be designated t historic iandeark or be included within a
historic landmark or within a preservatlon plan or an amsndaent
thereof within sixty days following the earliest of the above
described dates activating this section spplieatlon under the
ti circumstances; or,
(g) A final and `ending decision has been made by the
i city council that no part of any such building or structure
shall be designated a historic landmark or shell be !atludtd
within any designated historic landmark, Prorided, however,
that should the city council fell to act within ninety days .y.
from the date an appeal is filed, the requested permit (hail be
granted. The ninety day time alaiw1on may be waived by the
j appellant to allow the e:ty council an additional thirty days
in which to act. !
(b) It shall be the duty of the landmark caouaistion to r
furnish the building official with a copy or written notice of
each such written order or such agenda or such preservation
plan or astn"ont thereof, as the case may be, as promptly
after the, preparation thereof as is practicable. The failure
to so furnish the building official with a copy or written
notice thereof, however, shall not have the effect of
validating any building permit, removal permit or demolitiol
permit issued in ignorance of any such written order or
agenda, in any Ins.anet in which any such permit may not be
{I required, it shall be the duty o: the landmark commission to
give notice of any such written order or sn:h agenda a.- such
preservation plan or amendment thereof to the owner or oa"ners !
of any building or structure included within the adopt thereof,
which notice shall bt deemed complete when actually given,
*rally or in writing, to such owner or owners, or when written
notice thereof is deposited in the United Sts:es mail, pottage
.
prepaid, certifies or registered, with return rocaipt
requested; Addressed to such owner or owners, whichever meant
first occurs. 1{
PASe
i
J
r
A~; petals Issued we tr.}' person o anti:roc or
titer :hs dice o: an+.'
such wri:.en order, Or such ttenda, or
the approval or »commeada a on of such preserratlon plan or
aaendmen: :hereof, a the Cast mly be, shall be null, veld and
of no force or effect until the earliest of the events
described In subparagraphs (11, (1) and (3) of subsection (a!
y ,
next above to occur. ,
(d) Notwithstanding any ether provision of this chapter, -
no building permit, removal permit or demolition permit shall
be issued by the building inspector for an), structure located
in a National Register District except as authorized by the
subsection. The building inspector shall notify the landmark
commisslom immediately of any application requesting a 34ildino
peralt, removal permit at demolition permit for a structure
located in a Nstlonai Register District. No such permit shall
be issued by the building inspector before the tandmark ;
eommission has made a recommendation or scheduled the structure
on its agenda or before the expiration of forty (101 calendar
days, whichever to sooner. If a'structure is made an agenda
Item, it shall be scheduled for a oublic hearing as soon as
adjacent property owners are notified. For purposes of this
subsection, "Nattonal Register" District„ is defined at a
designated area possessing a significant concentration, linkage '
at continuity of sites, building structures or objects which
Are separated
geographically but are linked by association or
history, proridad, that no area may be considered a National
Register Dlstrlct for purposes of this subsection unless !t has
been designated in the federal Register pursuant to the
National Prsserrstion Act of 1066, as amended, prior to the
effective data of this amendmsnt,`and until zips depicting such
arse are z&de available for Inspection by the public in the
office 0 the Building Inspection Department. Notwithstanding
tar provision hereof, this section shall net Apply to
gsaxraphlcsl areas designated as historic districts under the
provisiens of this crdinanes.
PAU 11
i
i ~ }
I.
I
3
Se::ioa S;•il. SA.~:-0!:SSStO~ OF ~E::'s55;.?1' R.?AIRS. a
(a) The exte:lor of a designated historic lsndmark shell
be maintained to insure the structural soundness of such
landmark.
!b) if the landmark commission finds that there are
reasonable grounds to believe that a designated historic
landmark Is structurally rtsound or in Imminent danger of
becoming structurally unsound, the landmark commission shall
notify in writing the owner of record of the designated
historic landmark of such fact.
(c) Upon the giving of ten days written notice to the
owner of retard of such designated historic landmark, the {
landmark commission shall hold a public hearing to determine if
the designated historical building is structurally unsound or
in imminent danger of becoming structurally unsound, The
landmark coamission's report may Include evidence of economic
hardship or willful neglect. {
(d) At the conclusion of the hearing, if the landmark
commission finds that the designated` historic building is
Y
structurally unsound or in danger of becoming structurally
}
unsound and that no valid reason exists as to vhy the avast
cannot or should not undertake to lifeguard the structural
soundness of the building, it shall in writing notify the
1 record owner of the finding.
to) The owner of record of a designated historic landmark
who has been notified by the landmark commission that such
s
landmark is structurally unsound or in danger of so betoming
shall within ainrey days of retsipt of such notate, sstisfy the
historic landmark commission the, reasonably necessary repairs
to safeguard the structural soundness of the landmark have been
effected.
(f) It the landmark commission determines the! the
' building is structurally unsound but there sre valid reasons
why the owner cannot or should not undertake to safeguard the
structural soundness of the building, it stall forward to :he
PAN -I
4
Woo
E f
16. y coup II its reco=iadI ion as to ++hai action, If any,
t
should be taken on the structure.
F (g) Any applicant or interested person aggrieved by a
h ruling of the landmark commission under the prorisions o! this °
section may, within thirty days after the date of such ruling,
appeal to the city council.
Section 2SA•13. HISTORIC LANDNARK DESIGNATION TO
COEXIST KITH OTHER USE CLASSIFICATIONS.
Use classifications as to all property which may be
included in a historic landmark designation shall euntinue to
be governed by the comprehensive toning ordinance of the city
and the procedures therein established.
Section 2SA•14, HISTORIC DISTRICTS DEFINED: RESTRICTIONS
IMPOSED THEREINt CRITERIA FOR DISTRICT
' BOUNDARIES ESTASL1911V; REQUISITES .-FOR
APPLICATIOYS FOd - DISTRICTS SET pORTH•
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING SAME PROVIDED]
DISTRICT PRESM'ATION PLANS DEFINED: MIS.
CELLANEOUS. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
LANDMARK COMMISSION SET FORTH;` PAOCEDUP.E
► FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDINANCE PROVISIONS
ESTASLISHED, s;
(a) DEFINITION, ' Districts which may be designated
Historic Landmarks pursuant to Section ;AA-1 shall herein be
referred to as "HISTORIC DISTRICTS" ' and shall mean
geographically definable areas;' possessing significant
concentration, linkage, or continuity of buildings, structures,
sites, areas or land which are united by architectural, his-
torical, archaeiogieal, or cultural importance or significance.
(b) RESTRICTIONS, All buildings, structures, sites, areas
or lands located with a designated histvie district, whether
individually designated historic or not, are subject to these
regulations. No person or entity shall construct, reconstruct,
alter, change, restore, remove or demolish in any way the
exterior features of such building, structure, ar site, arcs or
;
land until a permit his been granted by the building official
of the City of Oentoa. Furthermore, no public improvements,
including, but not limited ;o, street construa;lon, signs,
lighting, sidewalk construction, parking !acilities end traffic
PAGE L7
i
. .ri n YN vie a. .
1~4
1
r rya am hantts, except :raf£i: con:: el signs and 6eri:es, shall
be made within or *:-ins a historic district without
+ approval of the city council after recommendation has been
submitted by the landmark Coamission and app:epril:+ city
I , departments.
(c) DISTRICT- SOIA+'DARIES. The boundaries of historic
districts shall be drawn so as to include all buildings;
structures, sites, areas or lands which most one or more of the f
criteria set out in Section 23A•3 herein or which directly
affect or relate to such buildings, structures, sites, cress or
h lands meeting on one more of the Section 21A•3 criteria,
:y
provided that at, least Sli of the total structural within the
boundaries are of architectural, historic, ar:haeological, or
cultural importance or value,
(d) LSTAlLISHM -f Of HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
` (1) Applications for considatation of a historic
district shall' be Used upon architectural, historical,
archaeological or cultural importance or, value and accompanied
by a tepOrt to the landmark Commission Containing the following ti
,information.
(a) A list of specific buildings, structures, sites,
, areas or lands of Importance or value located within th.
proposed district boundaries and a description of the
particular importance or value of each such building,
r structure, site, area or land.
(b) A asp showing the boundaries of the proposed
historical district draws to a scale of 1"e1001; and the
j location of each structure of importance or value identified by
I a number or letter designation.
(e) Sufficient photographs cf tso% building,
stfuttufe, site, area or land of impertanee or rams showing
the condition, color, site and atchiteew:al detail of each;
and,
PAGE 1a
i
I
(d) A des:ription of each building, structure, site, '
area or land of importance or value showing the condition.,
color, site and architectural detail of etch; and where possible _
t 1. date of construction
builder or architect
a. 3. chain of uses and ownership
}
e, architectural style .
3. materuls ~ I
6. construction technique
j
1, reeorgnition by State or National Government' as
aethitecturaliy or historically silmificaat, if so i
des lgntted.
(l) Application for establishment of an historlc district
on the basis of cultural or archaeological importance or value
sball be Accompanied by • report containing the following
informl
tioa:
(a) A map showing the boundarlei of the proposed
district drawn to a scale of 1"02001;
(b) A description of the cultural or archaeological 1
Importance or value of the building, structure, site, area or {
load being proposed for historic designation; and
(c) Any evidence whleh would show recognition by
either the State of texas and/or the National Government.
(3) Applications to increase the boundirits of to historic
district may be made if one or more of the following conditions
are mats
(a) When buildings, itructurer, sites, areas or lands
of importance or value are rolat<d to the district are requested
for inclusion,
(b) Khen facts previously undisclosed to or unknown by
the landmark commission are ravelled whi:h indicate that a
part,cular building or site is possessed of special
echitactural, ar:haaoioglcai, cultural or historical importance
Ot vaiui.
PAU :0
3
C=} Appitcations :o redute the bounftries of an
hlsto:i:
itat:I nay be made when ons o: more of the follow np
conditions have been met:
(a) When it car. be shoo.. that a par:i:ula: building,
structure, site, area or land has no historic, ar:hitettural,
ar:haeolorical or cultural Importance or value to the viability
of the district.
(b) When exclusion of buildings, structures, sites,
areas or lands is necassary for mrjor new development that would
skpport eithe: the srehitsctural,*hlstorlcal, ar:haealori:al, or
cultural character or economic viability of the district.
(c) Yhen it can be shown that no degradation of the
district either physicals historical, architectural, a:chat-
ological, or cultural vill result from exclusion of property '
from the district.
(S) 'Application for Inclusion or exclusion may be made when
either continued exclusion or inclusion of property within the
district would render it an economical hardship for reason- able
continuation in its present exterior form. In order - to
establish such economic hardship, the owner must show that no
III
reasonable alternative use exists which allows the exterior of
the building to remain in its original style. In evaluating
economic return, the Commission may request the owner to
document the value, rents, returns, tax burden, and/or
contracts, pertaining to the property, '
3
(e) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS.
In evaluating applications for historic districts, the
landmark commission shall consider Sections 2!A•3 and Section
2!A•13(d), if the 'landmark commission recommends the
establishment :f in historic district or districts, it shall
cause to be prepared an historic district designation ordinance
! which shall contain, but not be limited to, the followings
(11 A statement of purpose setting forth the t
eouission's reasons for recommending de•irnetion of the
dil%:ic:; and
h
i
4
I
1
I
(l) A legal description of :he boundaries of :he I
I
(3) Maps, charts and photographs of the buildings, j
structures, sites, areas, or lands located within the district; I
i (e) Findings that support the criteria required in j
Section HAAS and 1SA•13, if applicable, that establishes the
1
particular importance or value of the disteic:. I
(S) Aecomendations for the protection and preser• 4
vatlon of the di atrict referred to herein as district
preservation plan.
(f) DISTRICT PRESERVATION PLAN.
The district preservation plan shall include, but shall
not be ilmlted to the following:
(1) toning Classification of Uses, The commission may
examine the uses existing within the district in terms of their
Individual `aid continued effect upon` the character, safety, {.Yr
etanoaic and physical impact of the district and may recommend
4 such changes in toning, height and area regulations.
Building ode Requirements. - The commission may
review and recommend any amendmests to the building regulations jj
f
it tells necessary to preserve the architectural and historic
integrity and authenticity of structures within each such
district. {
(S) Sign Regulations, The Commission may review the
provisions of the sign regulations that are permissible s3thin i
each such district and recommend such alterations in else,
location, type and construction %hey feel appropriate. In
preparing such recomendations, the Commission shall eeastder
existing signs as will is criteria for future signs, In the
event that an existing sign or signs are decried to have a
negative impart on the character of the district, the Commission
tray tecommend a method of removal or improvement of such sign or
11gai, reviewing su:h sign thangas with owners or tenants prior
to such raeonaendation,
PAGE 21
1 Owl
i ~ 1
I
"
I
(4) Parkins ,2egulations. the comnission may review
r
the parkin: regulations in existence in the district and
recommend any changes in numbers, or location of or.-street and
t off-street parkini requirements it feels na:essary to anhince
the district. It shall review the adequacy of parking ;
facilities in or affecting the district and may offer rocom-
mendations for such public and/or privatb parking lots, garstes
or structures it dues to be in the best overall interest of the
dIatrIc:,
(S) Architectural Regulations.` As a guide for those
seeking a certificate of appropriateness pursuant to Settion
1SA-11, the historic landmark commission ma;', in'conformence with
the applicable toning cisssification, height and are&
limitation, and in keeping with the stpilleant architectural,
historical, archaeological or cultural elements of each such
district roc*uond `regulations affecting the exterior of the
building; including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Acceptable materials for new construction such as
stucco, masonry, metal and glass curtain;
(b) Appropriate architectural character," scale and ,
detail for new construction;
(c) Acceptable appurtenances to new and existing
structures such as gables, parapets, balconies and dormers:
(d) Acceptable textures and ornamentation such as
II point colors and types, use of wood, stone, metal, plaster,
i plastics and other mia-made materials, use of shutters, wrought `
and cast Iron, finishes of metal', colors of Slits, sues a'
silver, gold, bron:e, smoke, and other details or architectural
i grnnentaLlon..
(e) Acceptable seeessortas on pew or existing
structures such as light fixtures, jai tights, canopies,
exterior carpentry, tile at wiod, banners, flats and
projwlons and
I!~ -
PAu:-
f
j
' vita w.r
;
i
{
(f) For :hose properties which are sir:s, a:eas,
lands, build°.ngs, structures, or vacant lots which a:e not of
historictl, architectural, archaeological or cultural importance
or value, development or redevelopment city be az the owns'':
discretion as long as there is no variance from the historic
district preservation plan to materials, scale and detail, {
appurtenances, textures, ornamentation and "accessories, and the
owner complies with existing regulations, In these instances,
no review by the landmark commission would be required, and no j '
certificate of appropriateness would apply.
(6) Transit and Traffic Operations. The commission i
may review the transit and traffic operations in and through the
district and provide recoomendttiors to the urban transportation
department and city council on routes, schedules, one-way lad y r
two-way street` pasterns, park and rise, shuttle services and
pedestrian facilities the: will enhance and preserve the i
eh:raeter of the district, a '
.y
(f)` Public lmprovementa. The landmark concision may ;
recossaend to the city council acceptable public architectural
and engineering designs lncln,'ins street lighting, street
furniture, signs, landscaping, utility ficilites such as i'
electric poles and wires, telephont lines; design textures of
sidewalks and straits, such as brick, stone and tile, sad such
• other elements is deemed necessary for enhancement and E
preservation e! the district,
(s) Administrative Requirements of Landmark Commission.
(1) when a historic landmark commission considers an
r
area as a possible historic district, it shall, prior io
j rendering its final recommendation end report, submit its
report, including the district preservation plan er any proposed
ordinance amendments to all city dopirtaents, boards and
tommissions and other public agencies directly affected.
(1) In Addition, to shall, and prior to rendering its
flail reconsondation, cake the plan available to the Landowners
in the proposed dlsttlet, in the aver.: the e:ea undt:
?AO! =l
1
i
{
1
portlon thereof, during which any vloiation be-10! Is A0%zj'j*d,
:on:inues or is psrmi:ted, and upon :olrl:tior. of any such
i viol atioI stall $e punishabla by s fine not to exceed two
hundred dollars.
Section 2lA-18. NOTICE.
Any notice required to be siren under this title, H not
actually delivered, shill be given by depositing the same in the '
United States mail, posteae prepaid, addressed to the person or
antlty to whom such notice is to be kiven it his last known
address. When notice is required to be given to an owner or
ownersof property, su,.h notice, delivered or mailed by
r
certified ar relisterod moil, may be addressed to such owner or
amers, who have rendered their said property for city taxes as i
the ownership appears on the last approved city tax roll. {
ii.
MUM
This ordinance shill become effective from and after its i
date of passage and publication as required by law. R 4
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,
,
19 i
y.
~ y
CITY Of DIVT'ON, TEXAS
A51, ""lull
ATTEST:
i
CITY Of Dv ' T8XA5 '
I IT
APPROVED AS TO MAL POPM 1
C. J, TAYLOk JR„ CITY
ATTOP..CEY, :I+Y OF DE.NTOS, TEXAS
8Y:
i
?ACI 2d
i
}
T
f 1]
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE, December 9, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM i}
y
a' APPROVAL OF A pROPOS'D STREET BOND PROGRAM AND PRELIMINARY
g SUBJECT: ELECTION DATE
e
SUMN,4RY The City Council requested additional input concerning a
proposed steet bond program. The attached memo provides
the,additionbl information and the City Council rust
determine what programs to submit for an ruction. If the
Council will set a preliminary election date, the necessary
ordinances Will be drawn to call the election.
i
ALTEMATIVES: 1, Establishing a bond program and setting a preliminary
date {
u 2 Rejecting the boN issue.
34 Delaying the program for further consideration.
SOURCE OF FUNDS: After Approval of the ~pproposed bond programs, all financing
will be accomplished through the issuance of general i
r obligation bonds
r
i
j
1
71
CIT1►O/ D@NrON, TSX" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 366.8200
j'
i ,
i 4; T0; G$ Chris Hartung, City Manager A~
FROM: Rick Svehla, Director of Public Works
DATE: December 3, 1980
RE: Consider Additional Information on the Bond Issue
At the December 21 1'110 meeting the Council asked for additional information
on the Bond Issue, 'they indicated the need for more Information on what
inflation, would do to our current figures, what the cost of j on year
pproggram would bn, and also what the total of any of the packages, including 5
Engineering, wooId cost. 1
k As we indicated in earlier memos, we would estimate Engineering costs to be
appproximately 10% of the total cost of the final program. We have also
t of therprogrfamsswouldrbenas1followseach succeeding
estimated inflation tcosbe 10% f the
year, Thereore the
Total Tax
cost Engineering Cost trt_rc_ eese
Pro act y.
21~
,
2 Year Program 54,276,000 $427,000 $4,7030000
32f s r ;
3 Year Program $604879000 5649,000 $7,1369000
5 Year Program $121099,000 $11210,000 $139309,000
k'
Bell Avenue $770,000 3t
TWU Design $100,000 $70,000
Extention to 5685,000 3t ;
Sherman $660,000 5250000 j
1 S220,000 1S
t McKinney Street $200,000 $20,000
(Existing Channel)
6S
51009000 $1,300,000
Intersection $1,200,000 i
1
N
3
1
S
G. Chris Hartung
December 3, 1980
Page 2
We have again included the Bell Avenue options at today's prices, the
intersection improvements at today's prices and Only the McKinney Street
Bypass using the existing channel option in today's dollars. The cost of these f
projects would change depending on which yearsstaff woulinbeuiltif they are
included and approved in the Bond Issue,
channel option on the McKinney Street irvolvedbecauuse we feel that the other
options are too expensive for the use n
used 80-90% of the time at a cost of only 10% of the other options. We will
have a map available at the Council Meeting which will show the streets that
would be done in a 2 year program, what could be added in the third year, and
what could be contained in the last 2 years if a 5 year program were adopted.
The Finance Director calculated the tax increase required to support the
various projects assuming a 20-year schedule at 9%.
Rick Svehla
Director of Public Works
P1
I 4~i I ~ a
al
s
i
j
o t~ ti
~0 KO'~,~'tLx T8t6 StiI~ET ~
a r ~
HEAD THIS _UL:
a x.
r...
,tr
r
I
i
r n?
LET,. _ ,
e t ~
I
i
i
t
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
December 2, 1980
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council at 1100
p.m., Tuesday, December 2, 1980, in the Council Chambers of
the Municipal Building at which the following items of
business will be considered.
1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
November 18, 1980.
2. Public Hearinget
A. Rold a public hearinj regarding five amendments
to the sign regulations of the zoning ordinance
as followse
11 Approval of an ordinar.e amending the
zoning ordinance Appendix B by 'adding e
new subsection regulating politic.nl signs
on residential zoned prop4rtyt and
declaring an effective date. (The
Planning and zoning Commission recom::tends "
approval.)
21 Approval Of an ordinance amending article
17 of the zoning ordinance' by adding A~,new
subsection regulating special civic event
temporary signs lotted or, resident.iol
property) and declaring an effective z
date. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
has no recomraendation.l
3. Approval of an ordinance emending article
17 of the zoning ordinance regulating
signs located within a front yard areas
i and providing for an effective date. (The`
Planning and zoning commission has no
} recommendation.)
4. Approval of an ordinance amending .17t C,
11 of the zoning ordinance regulating
temporary signet and providing for an
effective date. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.) I
t
i . kr .
S`A. IYi
1
I
I
Agenda for City Council Meeting
December 2, 1980
gage Two
5. Approval of an ordinance repealing Article
17, C, 11 of the zoning ordinance,
effective it 1986! and prohibiting
portable signs effective January 1, 1986.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends denial.)
B. This is the petition of Mr. J. A. Miller
requesting a change of zoning from single ;
family (SF-7) to p)anned development (PD) for
commercial use on a parcel totaling
approximately 1.4 acres in size located along
the north side of Lindsey Street beginning y.
approximately 190 feet west of the intersection
of Lindsey Street and Fort Worth Drive. (The
Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval.) r
I ~
s. Approval of the request of V*., Golden' Triangle Mall, r
Inc. to reopen Piney Creek Blvd.
4. Ordinances:
A. Adoption of an ordinance abandoning a utility
easement on property located southwest of the j
t intersection of Loop 298 and Audra Lane.
5. Resolutionst
M A. Adoption of a Resolution authorizing the sale
of surplus city property located at the
a southwest corner of Sherman Drive and Denison !
Street to lien Goodwin (Sid #8802, awarded
September 160 1980).
{ B. Adoption of a Resolution authorizing the sale
E of surplus city property located at 517 !last
Prairie to Denton ConcrRte Co. (Did #9802,
awarded September 16, 1980),
r
C. Adoption of a Resolution executing two Railroad
Crossing License permits with the Missouri
Pacific Railroad Company for a sanitary sewer
line crossing on Prairie Street.
6. Discussion on the Street Bond Program.
7. Acceptance of the Construction Plans for the Paving
and Drainage Improvements on Mcrtinney Street.
I
I
r.Senda for city Council Meeting
December 21 1980
Page Three
8. Approval of the request of Mr. R. o. McDonnell to
furnish sewer service outside of the city limits on
Grissom Road. (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
g, Approval of endorsement of proposed legislation to
trio systems to errve all areas
allow munioipal elec
within the city limits. (The Public Utility Board
recommends approval.)
10. Approval of Change Orders relative to the Wastewater
Treatment Plant expansion project. (The Public
utility Hoard recommends approval.)
ill Approval of renewal of the Public official Liability
Insutance Policy for the City of Denton.
12. Consent Agendas
Each of theme Items is recommended by the Staff and
` approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of
the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent
j Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee
to implement each item In accordance with the staff {
recommendations.
E , A. Bids/Purchase Orderso
1. Did # 8829 Pad Mounted Switchgear
~ s
2. Bid # 8832 Truck Cab and Chassis and ,
Refuse Body
3. Bid # 8833 Volumetric Feeder
i
46 Bid # 8834 Uniforms Fire Department
5. Bid # 8835 Culvert Pipe
r 61 Sid # 6827 Spencer /Control~na~ld Interchange
Acquisition Equipment
Division in
low#
7. P. 0. # 45173 C
a~aountpofp$3047 96 for
Barminutor repair parts.
j
2<
a
1
I
Agenda for City Council Meeting !
December 2, 1980
Page Four
B. Platsi
1. Approval of the final replat Of John Roady
Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends appr6val.)
r 2. Approval of the final plat of Wimbleton f
Villaga Phase V. (The Planning and Zoning
commission recommends approval.) 130 Executive sessions
A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V. A. T. B. .
9
D. Real Estate - Under See. 2(f), Arta 6252-17 ! a
v.A.r.s. ~
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Arta 6252-17
kk V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), Art.
E 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
14. Consider Board Appointments. ;
I i
I
k
i ~ y
0
n
1
1
;32 City Council
November 16, 1960
Regular Me,tiag of the City Council of the City of Deotoa, Texas at 7100 p.e..
Tuasday, Yovetber 11, 1910, in the Council Chanber of the Municipal luildleg. '
PAr.SUT1 :4yor Ste,.art, Mayor Pro Taff Talfafvrro, Meaters Oallay, Saphene,
Copkins and Velaj City Manager Chris Hartung, Assistant City
Atto,tey Curt Solomott aid City Secretary !rooks Holt. I
ABSENT: Cocnetl Member Retsley and City Attorney C. J. Taylor.
1. Motion vat made by Vela, aecoaded by Napkins that the ninuas of
the Special Called Meeting of October 26, 1950 and the Regular Meeting of
t November he 19;0 be approved. Motion carried utaiimolily. i '
E
2. MLIC Rf1d11MOS: ±
(A) A tublic bearing via held of 2-1412, the petition of Mr. J.
i V. Strange, reguesti11 a Chants Of'aooing from office (0) classification to
planned development (PD) for one family detached housing on late ranging in
a1SO from 41 x 114 feet to 56 x 126 fast. The property In this request is
locates along the north aide of Nall hill street and is more partioululy
described as !lock 2, Lots 4, 5, 6, 0 one. 9 of touthridge Addition, f
f r"
Mayor Stevirt opened the hearing. After hearing 4 speak it favor,
and S speak in opposition the hsarlag was aiciad.
7ltaier Jeff Meyer reported that 25 letters were mat10 With 9 ?111
returned it favor, 5 against an'. i undecided, It said that it Will require 5
affirsutive ratan t~ approve. He added that the Planning and to'ning Conaiasioa
recoemeased approval unanimously. He also rsvldved 12 conditions recommended
by the Planning and Zoning ComniasLoa.
` The Mayor called fer a motion. Notion vas tide by Tsltaferra,
asooaded by Sopkine to approve the petition as recommended by the Planning I
And toning Cotaission and the City staff. " abstained, tvo voted loo, tvo
I! 'rated against aid one via abseat. Nation tail e3.
(3) A public hearing vas to be halt on t-1466, tae petition s.
Mr. Uttar R. Alvar►s, requesting a change a: acting froa single family (aP-Z)
to planned dsvelo;mont alasstfication for attics use.' The piopdr:y is ;
located it the aorthv►st earner of Wont and lroldvay streets, The pares!
is a part of the W. V. Wright Addition and is approximately .6 loess to sits.
fie The Attorney tepreuhting the petitioner requested that the
petition is vithdrava f»m the agenda.
I Couxil Neater Sopkins suggssted that eltiasne to adviasd of a
- vithdravil at 06 start of the Council meeting to order to alleviate displeasure.
Motion vas made by Rcpkins, oacanded by Taliefrrro tc tails tha
matter as requested, brit not to plait it back on the agenda until all pertinent
information is aVatleble. lotion carried unanimously.
(c) Mayor Ste'eart opened a public herring on E-146, the petition ;
of Mr. Charles It. Davis, Jr., requesting a ape aftc use permit which Would
allay a solOrete batch plat at h06 Z. s temew street. The property is more
r particularly dssdribed se County Tract 6% in the Hiram Cisco Survey.
Afar hearing 1 speak in favor, but none it opposition, the httr- 1
sag was elossd.
j
Pluaer Jeff Meyer stated that adolufte vat►r,'sever aid electrical 1
service is avatlable to the Oita. The exlsttrg batch plant Will remain !n
operation Only on a periodic basis, therefore no substantial iteroset In
traffic is anticipated. The proposed plait will rsportodiy to curb more
techaologitally sdvatced than say other titch plant in Denton. Planning
and Units felt that the proposed batch plant sppetrad to be oompatitl► Vt)'.
surrounditg laid uses and although the sits to not located along A aaJot
tboroughfare, loll Avenue is about 500 feet to the vest. I
1
1]
rf
t
,
f '
f
Yoveatar le, 1580 Continued 1 34 /
Notion vas made by Stophoas, zecondod by Vela to approve the
petition with the follevieg cenditionif
(1) All state and federal regulations regarding ocnstrn:ctlon
of nev facilities which may emit air contaminant$ shall
be met.
(2) After construction of the acv batch plant, the old plait
shall only be operated on a periodic basis.
Notion carried,
rho Council todsid..01 approval of a proposal from LM for defelop-
{ meat of Request for Propolaie and the evaluation of pra;oaal for Data Process-
ing aortvare sod bardvsre.
1. Aesi.tiat City Wager King Coil triefei the Council, reviov.'.ng the '
proposal by Lx4V,
I}} This effort entails three major tsskss
(1) Development of a detailed bequest for Proposal (brp) to 0e ,
C) sent to qualified Veadarl for a "turakey" eompu%Jr oyster.
inelnding computer equipment and the "core" applications
software outlined to our Phan I report.
Q (2) selection Of quLlifiad.vendors to receive the BPP aid the
"nation at these readers' prepneals.,;,"d tvalaation
prceall vill Include the definition of e'alustien criteria'
and the narrowing of the responses to the top two or three
proposals.
(1) The selection of the best voodar'e proposal taasiderinr
Denton 's holds and the devolopoent of A detailed Implement-
ation plan and sctee d based on this selietlod. The select-
k r ion process is planaei to Include up to three site visito
to observe the to waders saftvare is g,tratlom at an
existing user site.
It is projected that this process dun be eomplited by mid to Iota
January given a mid-yeramber start data, The City at Bryan is eossidering
authorising L'.rPtf to tattiate a selection system.
Beouired Professional Pees and Bxeeeeu
t
Denton Deatcn/Bryaa
id fi I
Cost Bach n
Prepare bequest tar Proposal 1111600 1 1,006
Tvalusts Proposals/Select
Tender (excludes site
visits) 16,006 18,300
Site Visits 11,90 .11A OW TOTAL Tay. M20.000
LWW did set espend $$,ON of the autherited Phase I bud``ot and eedseluesily
the City dud only authority a maximum of in additional +22,000 for Phase It.
Shedd Bryan authorise us to ;recall, the actual additional arouat required
veuld to further reduced to 110,006, Cola deneluded by stating the: the Advisory
Board recommends ta implemeatatldn plan, and to ask LvPYf to make their proposal.
Motion via made by Btephene, socended by No;VfnA to accept the
recommendation it the Advisory besrd Lad to authorize the "
proposal. Motion carried nnanimousiy. Mayor to alga the
,
i
.
1
C
- ..via
' 134 .
November 18, 1980 Continued
b• AESOLVTIOHS:
(A) The Council toaaiderod approval of the tolloving Anolutioa
authorising Denton County work oreva to perform vork vithia the torporate
limits of the City of Deat A.-
AESOLVTION
SL I^ RESOLVED BY TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTOS, TEXAS:
B ECTrOir
The City Council of the City of Denton, Texee, hereby authorizes Denton County y',a
wort trove to perform work vithla the corporate limits of the City of Deator,
TaxesI and
MW II.
That from time to time there are agreements b*tvoen the County, and City Vhlch
akeuitatea the CCUnty using Loth their personnel and aquiprseat to pertorn to
vark within the City for the benefit of the eititeca of both the County and
Cityl cad
Thta Anolutioa abill become effective from end after its date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18.1 day of November, 1980.
AICNARD 0. STEW' T, Y.AYOR r
CITY CP DENTON, TE US
ATMST, .
MOCKS HOLT, CITY BECRETARY
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
3 APPAOVZO AS TO LEGAL FOAXt
C. J. TAYLOR, M., CITY ATTOA.YFY
CITY Or DENTON, TFYA9
Motion was nude by Oailsyj wooded by Taliaferro that the 2es01•
utioa he pat Ad. On toll till vo:o Volt "eye", Stephsie "aye", Nopkias "aye",
Oc ley "aya", Tdiaterro aye and Stewtt "eye". MotiOa earring.
(A) The cwm4ii considered approval of the tolleving Resolution j
autherieing the exe:ution at a Pipe Line Lieensa Agraemant betvton the City 1
of Deatta and the Miooouri-Xeres-Texas Railroad Company:
R_B_BOLVTtOr `
BE IT AESOLVED of TU CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
The Mayor is hereby authorized aid directed to Assam to taaait of the City
of Dentet, Texas, a Pipe Line Lictne+ Agrosaaat dated November 1 1980,
LatV U the City of .aitoo Ind the Miasnuri•Eatoas-Taxis tot told Company.
PASSED AND APPAOVID this the leth day of Nev.mber, 1980.
ATTEST: L11 _
i AICBAAD...O. WART, MAYOR
BA000 BOLT, CITY SECRSTAAY
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
ii
APPAOVCD AS TO LEGAL FOFX:
1 y CITY OF DtM# TVA11 AT1ORN[Y
AL~
I
r maw
Y
I
10i 1
8aramber 16, 1980 continued
Notion was made by loplciaa, seconded by Veto that the PeaolutiOn
be posed. On roil call vote Stephens "aye", Cailey "eye", Vela "aye", 8op4lts
"aye", f+liafer" "aye" and Stewart "aye". Notion carried.
(C) The Conseil considered ipprovaI oi the follawice Aesoluttom
outlining the fur.Jng for the construction or the Service Center Varehousu
°
i 0A30tVTI09
WHEAUS, the City o: Denton is is teed of a to City Warehouse aid Service
Center Facility for the Electric, Water, Sewer, and tertafa General Covernaeat
Departmentsi and a l WKI:RM, bids have been received for such facility which list'
a cost of
1 1566,780,00 for the Varehouse anti a test of spprorimatelr 11,50,T20.06 for
the Service Gntir; and
I ? VaRW. it Is necessary to i~ecify A. source of f. dfrr to. ereh facilities; I i
1
XN, ThMFORZ, It IT HOLM SY THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEMO,
:YI TZM. TRATi
1. The Source of funds for the Varohoue, as !mated to be 'M
1566,730.00, ahal! be from the Electric Department tusf, and the &$$it value
of the Warehe ue shall be regardeA as in a$tat of the Fldctrio Department.
I I ~ .
Q 2. All other departmeots using tha Warehouse shall pay to the
Electric Department UL MW lean fee ttad oar a-
I ,
(a) Lacb departa+nt's squire footage me of the Warehouse floor fi k•
Weer Common Sam unused speed Shall be appertionel on a
pro rata bull to a''. ruing departmeatS.
(b) A charge equal to aconstant annual amertitatioa paynent
utiitatti a twenty (20) year ppaayout and an interest rate or r
elsht (8) pr coot per annum iestimated to be 1F.89 par
square foot Per year), plus{ }
(d) An additio"% charge par square foot equal to Six (6) per
want of the underpretiated Capital coot at the facility,
This charge is USad to pay the tlectrdd Dapartaent't annual
six (6) par coat return on investment paid to the city of
Denton (eatimated to to initially 11.70 per oquard loot per
year) i' providal, hogavar, that the percentage rate far Such
addition h charge (hall remain at the saes porcontale_rate
u the city COM61 annually oetablfshes for the tlectric
Department's *turn od investment paymoat to the City of
Denton.
3. Tht source it f420111 for the service Comae tsellityi ettLM&W
to to 11,54,720.00 shall to from ere Water and Srrer born Fund and the
Electric Fund, the Water ad Srror Sond fund shall provide caDDilal funds for
the prdportionate stare or area the. Will be apatifically utilhsd by the
I Watar and Se'rat Dipartmaat, p:w A J~TO rate share of the aommda oriae and
Other aaSociatod Cevelepnant costa, aatiastid to be 1393,215.04, and the
asset value of this proportionate share of the 6ervica cents: shall be re;arc-
ed as an aaet of the Water add Su or Dopartiont.
ff , The Eleatrie Oepatiment Fund s*:il prortde,tbs capital rude
I: for the temeinltg amount astlmated to be 11,156,505.04, and the asset rains
111 Of this proportionate share of the derviae Center shall be togardes is in
asst of the Electric Department,
t:
1. Departneoto other than the Utilaty Wpsetment ahal. pay to the
uld'iria Department as annual lease fa fir afuds epaCO bust on the square
I footage used, iaeludiig a pro rata share of the e0em04 area. Tr.e Charles
Shall be calculated to a similar manner to 2(al mad 2(b) listed herein.
rl.. ✓ a~
~ I
..«.q
y„vw;~'rr3}P-Y•!~<.
1311 November le, ip80 Continued
5. Maintenance sad opertttoa expenses shall to eharS4d to the
usins departments Or. an equitable pro rata basis.
6. Actual eosis and annual 10&34 tell shall to booed oo fital
as-built construction costs.
PASShD An A.FPROVEO this the 18th Uy of Itovober 1980.
PICK "D STEPAR, MAYOR
ATTESTI .
OOKS MOLT, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF OLNTOd, TIX1.9 j
9
{ APPROV" AS TO 1,1011 701W
d C, J. TAYtAR, JR., CITY ATTOPIST {
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
if$s/.....
e
Motion was made by Nopkias, ueeodad by Vela that the Sosolutiod'
be passed. On tell tall vote Stepheni "aye"1 Cailey "Aye", Yeti "aye", Napkiga
"aye", Taliatorro "aye" and Steuart "aye": Motion nettled,
S. The Council eemidered ivardtnd of aid #8929, construction of Phase It
of the Animal thelter.
Jim t1rkp4trltk, "IcAltoot for the Animal Shaltor, laid that be vas
recommeediat !PC Corporattca of Iherman, the motoad low bidder, with a 'Did
of 11120$32 for oonstructton of phase III
Motion vas maae by We$ setoaded ty Ositey to award bit PHU, ,
s j construction of Phaia It of the Animal Sheltar, to RTC Carporatitn at a bid
of 1112,632. Motion tarried f to 1. ;
6. The Council considered approval at a ehente order for the Library
Conatruttion projda .
1 The Council was sdvie4d that the chants order la the increased e
mount et 111149 is to add Outlets for t413int tans to the old laction or
the Library.
Motion '•4t made by Stephens, seooadeb by Nepk:ae to approve the <
PW44 order to t•r increased amount of 11,145. Motion carried. j
1 F
T. The Council eoastdered approval of authorization for the Mayor to
join the Coate County Mayor's Association.
Motion %me rode by Volt., tecondsd by Stophen4 to apptve the MAVIV
joiatnS the Denton County Aytr's Association, Motion dirtied unanimously.
8. The Caused considered aA appeer.nca by rspromlitire4 of the
Golden Triangle gall relative to traffic problems around the Mali.
Mr. Lloyd Ballard tf Sears in the Mall diked the Council to more
barricades ea piney Crook and San Oetrial ttrltte. Ne $aid the streets are
nodded to serve the Mall arsao particuluiy tit laturdays. Ne 8111te4d is to
the vary daaterout traffic donditioos end sell that openly the 4ubject
streats v"ld tole in relieving the preslure as tmp 288 and 1.158. Rd
+ etneluded by Saying, "The M41 is a property owner and a taxpayer aid should
not to denied the use of City Sttoets". t,.
* t e' The Mayor advised that actioa could not he taken at this aeetint.
E
H
d'
~ 4.'
t
~:MY,1'Y eP•.ra_I,C6 y<•e.,;:Y e515 nap ,..a .r
I
Yovember 18, 1960 Continued 1 8 i
f I
9. CONSOT A311MAI
Notiom vat made by Vote, seconded by Taltaflrro that the following'
Coolant Alaoda to approved. Motion carriai unanimously.
(A) ams/ptJRCRASS ORmst
i
(1) bid 08823, truck eah and chassis add dung bodies was
± rwarded to Calvert Motor Company at a W al. bid of 1105,640.50.
(2) Bid 08810, leader backhoe, vet awarded to Case ?over 1
Bquipeact, Wall, Texas at a total bid of 126,853.00.
(3) ?urch.aea Order 045860, rental on a 6510 Ditch Witch vat
approved it the anoaudt of 13,160.
J (B) PLATSa +t
11) Final plat approval of Wlmblttam Village ?hail 111 vas
approved.
4 10. The Council retested into Txteotive teeslon at 1000 p.m, to diecusl ;t.
legal matters, rod estate, personnel and board appointmemtl,
It. The Council racodvasd into public leolied at 11:00 p.m. to take !
Q the following actioal
t
Q (A) The following Resolution was pruontedr i
it1.10LS1TIOIt t''>
WSPUS, the City of Oedtod finds St aeeesfary to pcr:bue a Certain treat of
land located in the City of Denton, Texil, aa4 mart tulle deserited belovl and
►7! MS,'the City Caudell of thn city or Dodged is of tA#apiatom that the
beet intotast 1e4 welfare of the public will to served by the purchase of the
f portal of red estate desertbed belavi and
kKT US, the 01!Y p of Denton and owner of laid parcel , W. B. Runwell agree that
a edmaiderattom Of 080,930.00 it a fair an4 reed Value Of such desarited
1
I , B p yi
Now, Tmurill, it it RDSOLYro BY'TKI CITY C"Cn 0? THE CITY OF Dmou,
TVA1, TRATI
I. The City Attorney is herety antherited to propare whatever legal
documents are decaltary to complati tto transfer at property so desaritod
below from the owner thereof to the state of Texan
i
Being 33,992 square tilt of land, more or leas{ out df ind a part of a treat
at land situate! in the A. B. Longbottom survey, Abstrast Yo. 773 that was
eomveyai to k. 8. Roll by deed doted July 12, 1963 as racordad in Value
497, ?age 13, told Records Of Denton County, Texas$ said 3?,992 square fait
of land Wag marl pertloularly dW rlbad by metal and bounds as folloWl
820=1113 at the point of idterlsctica of the proposed vest right of vty lime )
Oe propOill Tao; 268 with the south boundary line of aai4 Bummoll tract, said
F point being 8evth 88' 35, 12" east a diatana of 191.63 het troll the south-
volt Career thtreofl
TMYC1 north Ole 40' 41" tilt aieng the proposed right of way Sine for a
distsnee at 120.84 feet to a points
TWCB north 44e 12' 12" vest for a distance of 84.85 tact to thi paint of
iatergeeticm of said proposed right of Vey Side with the existing south right
of Vay lido of V. 1. Highway 3801
TWCT north 85e 27' 34" east vitb laid existing U. S. 380 tight of way line
for a diltaneo of 180.78 tat to a point od the sxssting Vitt right at way line
et Leap 2631
......III ~
qY ~1 r
_ d:. nos
r,7
i
I
I ,
~3S November 18, 1980 Continued
TNENCE South 460 OS 52" flat along the said sxisting right of way line of
Loop 288 for a distance of 68.48 feet to a potatt
TNENCE south 00' 4T' Sim Vitt for a dtatsnce of 152.6T fsnt to a point!
' TEEBCE north 88' 15' 12" vent along the south boundary line of said Rumolt
tract for a distance of 1T1.81 feat to tho place of bestoaiag.
2. The City of Denton is hereby further authorised to par W, D
Rmamell as owner of 0614 described property, consideration !n the amount
of $900.910.00 purchase
prier, plus necessary and reasonable recording h11.
i
8. This Sesolutioa shall take efftt! !m4M&tatr from and attar ;
i. ` its passage and approval in accordance with %ho rovieions of the Denton Cit
Charter. P City
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of November, 1980.
/s/
f I
0 0. SHOT, fOR E r
ATTSSTt CITY Of DEN ON, TLXA!
1.
_ ~ of
OI~I OXSOXS EO,T, MY SDCRITANT
CITY Op DENTON, TEXAS
APpAOM AS TO U04 YOM 5
C. d. TAYMA, a., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OP DENTON, TEXA!
+yr'
Mine Val made by Vela, eadondad by lopkins that the 9e40101011
6 be pu06d, On. roll call vote Oatley "aye", Eopkinf "aye", StepbedS "aye",
Vela "ayf", Taltafsrro "aye" sad Stewart "aye". Action tarried.
(S) ?tetlan ws made by Yeia, ucoadfd by Taliahrra that Saul P.
Williams and Berry :ones tic app4!ot44 to the Plumbing 6 Meeh06l4sl Coos Beard. V
watidn darrlcd unanleausly. j
(C( The following Coundil Nanbfrs very appointfd by Mayor Stewart
to the xunoll Audit CowAttesi Charlie Eopkias, Ray Stsphens aad Xtohard
Tallaferro.
Meotlag ad,}ouraed at 11105 P.M.
II 4
I
luyr
CITY SECMAAY
e; e e e
AE; 1,41,: i
At
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December 2, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM i
SU8JECT! Hold a public hearing regarding five amendments to the sign regulations
of the zoning ordinance as follows!
A. Approval of an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance appendix B
by adding a new subsection regulating political signs on residential
propertyl and declaring an effective date.
B, Approval of an ordinance amending article 11 of the zoning ordinance
by adding a new subsection regulating special civic event temporary
signs located on residential propertyl and declaring an effective date.
C, Approvei of an ordinance amending article 17 of the toning ordinance
regulating signs located within a front yard areal and providing for an
effective date
0, Approval of an ordinance amending article 17 Co 11 of the zoning
ordinance regulating temporary signsi and providing for an 'effective date,
E. Approval of an ordinance repealing article l?, Co 11 of the zoning
ordinance, effective January 1, 1986, and prohibiting portable signs ,
effective Janaury 16 1936.
SUMMARY: A. The proposed ordinance applies to temporary political signs and
provides that on residential zoned property no political sign spay be
erected prior to 46 days of the election date and said sign must be
remoYed ithin ten (10) days after the completion of the etri.tion said
sign advertises, including any run-off election. Said sign 04y Act be
lar or than thirty-two (32) square feet and not more then one sign for
etch candidate or ballot measure may be erected on one lot or tract of
land. No political sign ma be placed, erected, or"allowed to remain
upon any portion of the public street right-of-way of the City of Denton
in any toning District.
8, The proposed ordinance applies to the advertising of special civic
events and provides that "The 9uilding official is hereby authorized to
issue a ermit for the temporary location of a portable sign, not to
exceed lr square feet for a period not to exceed 16 days on any lot
within the City for the purpose of advertising a public event, trade show,
or other special civic event, No such sign may be located on a lot
Zoned As SF-16, SF-13 SF-14, SF4, 24, MF-A MF-l, MF-2'District Use.
Not more than four M permits may be issued for any lot to any calendar
year. No portable sign shell be located within 16 feet of the edge of
the traveled portion of the roadway or in violation of Section 24.17g 3
of the Code of the City of Denton. 1
l
.~.yyy~~~ 111111 ,
~N
1
Y
Page Two
E
1 C, The proposed ordinance would revise Article 17, I as follows:
"No sign shell be erected within the required front yard, except a pole
sin not exceeding eighty (80) square feet in area may be erected on.
sites utilized b gasoline service. stations, drive-in grocery or similar
quick service retail establishments. No ;uch pole sign shell be located
so that any portion of the sign encroaches into the public right-of-way
and shall not be lower than eight (8) feet above finished grade."
At this time article 17, I reads as follows: ,
"No sign shall be located or erected within the required front yard,
except a pole sign not exceeding eighty (80} square feet in area may
De erected on sites utilized by gasoline service stations drive •in
grocery or similar quick service retail establishments. No such pole
signs shall be located so that any portion of the sign # oachei into
the public right-of-way for a distance of more than two (2~ feet from the
property line."
0 The proposed ordinance applies to temporary portable advertising
signs and provides a 72 square foot maximum area for portable id=
vertising signs, permits the signs onl in the NS OR, C, CB; LI NI
Districts and specifies that no portab a,sign shall be located w;thin
10 feet of tho edge of the raodway or n violation of Section 24-179 ;
(visibility triange) of the code of the City of Denton.
E. The proposed ordinance would rhibit portable signs In the City
of Denton effective January 11 1986.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve any or all of the ordinances. '
to Deny any or all of the ordinances.
3. Table any or all of the ordinances.
4. Modify any or all of the ordinances. I
RECOMiENOATION: A. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval by a,
vote of 4-0 vote.
8. The Planning and Zoningg Commission has no recommendation on
this proliosed ordinance{ i~+V on to approve failed by a vote of
C. The Planning and Zoning Commission his no recommendation on
this proposed ordinance. Motion to table failed by a Vote of
3.1{
0. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval by
a vote of 4.0.
E. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial by a
I
4-2 vote$
EXHIBITS: 1. The five proposed ordinances.
It. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of October 16 and November 5,
19800
III, Petition in opposition to proposed ordinance prohibiting portable signs
after January 1, 1986.
j
AM
e~
0
~.~...r t.. y err
Changed upon ra.omaendation of Planning a Ming COMML6910A
AN ORDINANCE MtINDINO ?NO ZONING ORDINANCE APPENDIX 6 Of THE
CODE Of THE CITY Of DBNTON T1XAS, is MERELY AHMED BY ADDING A
PRROPSIMICAND DECLARING AN APkCTIY! OATti9 ON RESIDENTIAL ZONED
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of DENTON, T1W HERESY ORDAINS:
Art1s1a 17 of tho toning Ordinscea Appi%dtx E of the Cede
t of the City of Denton, Texas to hereby amended by adding a now - " '
subsection N. reading as follows:
AlrilCLS 17
H. Taaparary pofitieal Signs
On too 4sattal gonad roparty no 4olltieal sion,/iay. a
sroetl prior to tt.dayya the a ctlnn data and sa d
sign must, be romorod kithia tee,(10) days alter the i "
001mp%Gtioe , of the 616Ction said sin advMrtiN1,
includtn say run•olt ai6otlane. Said sgign°moy.itet be
ur/sr t an thirty,t o (St) syuara fsot,and eot.n6t6 r4
than ena 11 g4 1Ot sac eaedldato er ballot aoosur6 so
ko p6lltEea
be srsetod on Oro 1ot,or tract of land,
it gn may ba piacsdoroe 6d, 6r allowed to romsin u~66
I j soy portion of the pubiie ttroat rllht•eE•way of the
f City o! Donto" to any toning Distri to
r I A ~T10N lL' ,
This ordinance shall become eftaetira trom,sad altar its
i
F data of pasaap and publication At te`ulrod by law.
1
PASSID AND APPROM this the day of
No
Ct7Y OP DE~ITON, "T1XAJ
ATTEST:
~l'6SA y
CITY Of 'HT N, TEXAS
APPROY>:D AS TO LEGAL ;ORM:
C. 1A TAY10Ai !R, CITY ATT00.KgY
CITY Op 7w~l.,N, T~XAS
~ lYt
"'r'
1
changed uPon,reo.,"ndation of 41 ning a ",.Lnp Commission
8
• No. ,
CITYROFN "TON ~TEXAS,,DYCADDIN00A NEW SUBSECTIONIN REGULATING
SPECIAL CIVIC EyENT TEMPORARY StONS LOCATED ON RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY{ AND OCCLAAINO AN EPPECTIYE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THS CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS HERESY ORDAINSS
Article 17 of the toning Ordinance, Appendix E of the.Codo
of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby notAd by adding a new I
i subjection N. retains as followas
AATICLH 17
N. Speclal,Civie Evahts;
Tho Building official Is hireby authorlled t$ 10 ino a
pewit for the temporary location of a Ma to li=n,
not to exceed rl /qusel feet tot i~ ar ad net to
oxceed 11 do s on any lot' tSlthin tha city for the
purpose of sdyvertletnS a public Ivent, trade shoif,'dt
other spatial civic event. No euph $ign !ay b•
located on a lot toned A. SP•ld, SP•1S SY4100,SFf
ii f, 74 R, •10 1.2 District Use, bet aer tuA
lent ) HP petMits H may be issued f' ass tot ~n any
eolandaf yeas. " No portable siSn`arsh:ff be laeeted
within iS fat of the ad a of the traveled yortien of
the roadway or it violation of Section t/•lT9 of the r'
Code of the City of Denton.
!!Ct AY t1. ~ , +
k This ordinance shall become affective ttom and sitar its
1! data of passage and publication as raquirod by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the, day of
1910.
Smf
"AR ~
CITY Of T
16
' ATTESTS
CITY Or b!Nt;CM,1TrSXAJ
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR4S
C. J. TAYLOR JR. CITY ATTORNEY
CTTY Of DAMN, TEXAS
F IL I
AN ORDINANC3 AMMAO AATItLE 17 t 01
m! WRING OROINAifCa
314NDI)< E OF'7NE CODE Of THE C1TY of DENTON Tax" REOULATtia
EIQ4S LOCATED NITNIN A FRONT YARD ARMI AN1S MOV76ING toll AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THI COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS NAEfY ORDAINEt
Aettele 17, 1 of the lanins Ordlaanea, Appendix l of the
+ Coda of the City of Deatan, Texas Is hereby saended to that that
ease shalt hereafter reed to follow
ARTICLE 11 I
I., Me sign shalt be erected vitbin the vequi ad f bn
yard, oxce t a paid sign eat owcoddinj 418 ty: 10) l .E.
wri foil in ared stay be orocttd on sits uetit!llta8
tasoliee service stattedat arlv*.In #iotoror
'ldiidr quick larvieo retail oitsbll
sheen
rrt , No: catch
pelo atEe ekdii be lots tid ee tkat, u+y.aorioe of the I
of fn aecroachas We the ublit riEht-eF•varr kid shalt
dot bo iowor,thart sight h~ feat abort fifth grads.
This trdieaneo shell become effective free and after Its
r date of Peuap and publication as required by taw. i
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of VIPs
t LpEO;
j
CITY Of DINTON, Tiw '
ATTESTa
I ;
ctrY nt DEN~oN, tgX,u
APPROVED AS TO L10AL FORIts
r C. J. TAYENTa tAR JR. CITY ATTORNEY
1 CITY OP DN, thm
Iri
j
.
A
A.. awl
A
No.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AR ICLE 17, Co 11 of Tma toq~~tNO ORDINANCE
APPENDIX E OF THE C00E SP THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS, REGULATINd
4 TENPORARY SIGNSI AND PROVIDING FOR AN 311ECTIW DATE.
' . THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HERESY ORDAINS:
NCTSy ION to
Artielo 171 Co (11) of the Eeninl Ordiaenee, APPOndir E Of
the Codi of the City of Derr- no Texas to hereby aeanded to that
the aaae $hall hereafter read as follows
ARTICLE 17
C. Taaperary $ISas uA..
Type WIN= Lreras a sPa in
f lte~ to s n r
(11) Adrettlatp= 71 S4.0t, NS, OR, C,CE No portable ,
(Portablf L1 HI Dtrtrlets sign shall be
locatod:kithin 10
foot; of the 0411
of,' the trivolel
portion of the .
lreadwiy or in
Wt. 24.170 0!
the 'Cede of the City e! Daatoa
r SICT104-1.
This ordintnce Chill boeooe effective trod and after Its
data of passage and publication to rsqutr*d by lax.
PASSED AND APPROVID this the day ofr E - '
1450.
j -
AAT r ~
C1TY OP 9DNTON, TEIAS "JI
j
ATTEST:
CITY OF 0 40 N, TEXAS
i
i APPROVED AS TO L24AL POANr
s
CIfY'OPA66NT690 HXA4TY ATTORNEY
{t 1Ys
197=zz" on, Mpg"
r
vase-'
1
i
I
AN ORDINANCI RE►IALINO 'AATICCE 17; C it of TNe 'toNlNc
DIUN?ON CI APPENDIX I OF THE 0001 Of 4RDINANCIS OF TNI em ,.4a
fIC?IV1 JANUARY '1 1016► AND PAC
PORTABLE S IONS 1►►ICTIVE JANUARY 1, 1916. NfIITINO
THE COUNCIL of THI CITY Of OINTON, TEXAS NIDIEIY ORDAINSI
t SIMON I.
Article l?, C, '(11) of the Code of the City of bostofts
Texas is hereby repealed effeetivi an January it 14t1.
from and alter Jennary 1, 110d,,Ne Portable Signs shill be
Permitted in the City of Oontan, Texas,'
! :I
SICTION 1114 This erdinaaee shall betems iffeetive on January 1, IIN.
CITY of DfN?ON, ttAl '
ATTIST:"
CITY OF OS +ON, TEXAS
)FROM AS TO MAL FORM:
J. TAYLOR JR. CITY ATTORNEY r
CITY OF 041(, TEXAS
f
~r
{
r
I
I
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
Octobar 15, 1980
.
The regalar meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was
held on October 15, 1980 at SOO p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Bob Woodin, Carole Busby Marilyn 011:hrist, Jack Miller
} and Linnie McAdams. Staff reseitt we.,e Jeff Ma or, Cherie$
Watkins, Rick Svehla, Greg Edwards, and Susan Ugand.
ABSENT: Robert LaForte and And--t Sidor.
Caroli Busby called the maating to order.
1. Approve the minutes of the October 1, 1980 meeting.
The minutes were amended as followss 1. A. - change A oust
to 6u us t, ii, A. 9th paragraph delete "which is a Fu--j
street, and add instead "and across from another office."
Motion was made by Woodin and seconded by Gilchrist to
adopt the minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimotsly. i
F
F Carole busby explained the procedural policy for the maetxng.
The order of the agenda was changed so that Z-1472 would be heard
first.
it. E. Z-1472. This is the ppatition of Mr. J. V. Strange requesting
a change of zoning from office (0) classificscion td planned
development (PD) for one family detached housing on a,minimum '
lot site of 41 4 113 fast. The pproppertyy in this request is
located along the north aids of Hollyhill Street and is more
pparticularly described as block 2, looms 4, 50 60 8, and 9 of
Southridge Addition.
Carole Busby 6scribed the case,
Charles Watkins described the surrounding land use and stated
that public facilities are available for extension to the site.
Tom Jester, representing Virgil Strange, spoke in favor of
the request,
Linnie McAdams arrived at this time.
Virgil Strange, petitioner, spoke in favor of the request,
stating that he felt a responsibility to the cl'rrent residents
of Southridge and also to the people interested in purchasing
his homes. He stated the minimum value of each home would be
$100,000 - $133,000. The ards would have sprinkler systems
and would ba landscaped, ach home would have a reer entry garage.
i
5
,
N
V
Minutes
Page Two
Mr. Strtugge added that all fences would be of masonry or wood
construction, Bach would b` a single family dwelling, Mr.
Strange presented photographs of typical patio homes in Dallas,
He stated that he would not sell the lots but would develop
the lots himself,
Fred Vaughan, resident of 306 Hollyhill, spoke in favor of
the request as a prospective buyer of one of the patio homes.
Joe Skilas, owner of 1407 RSdgecrest, spoke in opposition
to the request,
John Kokalis, owner of 1803 Concord Lane, spoke in opposition
+ to the request.
Dwight Galley, owner of 1722 and 1724 Stonegats, spoke in E .
opposition to the request,
Ronald Smith, owner of 1800 Concord, spoke in opposition to
the request,
Charles Watkins presented the staff recommendation, which was j,''
Approval. III
Marilyn Gilchrist asked Charles Watkins 11 the green space i
would be less with a patio home opposed to "a duplex, since
some of the residents in the area were concerned thkt there f E,
might be less green space,
Charles Watkins stated that the green space would be the same,
Virgil Strange spoke in rebuttal, stating that after the home 6
was built there would be the same amount of land or mora,lind
left as compared to a duplex, and that he would add trees in {
the front.
The Commission discussed the rase,
Marilyn Gilchrist stated that she was strongly in favor of
the request because the houses are high quality, and foals
Denton needs to offer people homes that are not attached
but yet have less of a yard to take care of compared to a
home built on a 7,000 equare foot lot.
Linnlb MCAdamn felt that planned development was better for {
the residents than office zoning because with a planned
development restrictions can be placed on the property,
e
Bab Woodin pointed out that patio homes are lees dense than l
duplexes, tnd under the current zoning duplexes would be
allowed. k
Jack Miller moved to approve 2.14721 Marflyn Gilchrist seconded
the motion and it passed unanimously, (5.0)
Bob Woodin left at this time.
A.
r.
S
Minutes
Page Three
A. Z-1467, This is the petition of Mr. Grant Jacobson
requesting an amendment to a portion of planned development
(PD-25), and a change of zoning from single family (SF-7)
to planned development. The amendment of the planned
development and zoning change from SF-7 to planned developp-
mar'• would permit development of a maximum of 42 one family
attached units on a tract totaling approximately 4,1 acres.
The parcel is located along the south aide of Windsor Drive
beginning approximately 450 feet west of Stuart Road.
` Carole Busby described the case.
Charles Watkins further described the case, i
Grant Jacobson spoke in favor of his petition, stating that
the currant density requested is 42 unite but would consider
lowering the density to 35 units if t%e Commission wished.
No one spoke in opposition.
Charles Watkirff presented the staff report.
Jack Miller moved to approve 2-1467 with the amendment that
the density be lessened to 35 units and with the following
conditionus
1. A 6 toot solid masonry fence shall bw constructed along the
southern boundary of this portion of PD-25 before any building
permits will be issued for this development,
2. Plat approval shall constitute site plan approval,
Marilyn Gilchrist seconded the motio'c'and it carried unanimously.
B. Z-1469. Thia is the petition of Mar Lou Collins ~tquesting c
& chants of zoning from single family (SY-7') to office (0)
classification at 1619 Underwood Street. The parcel is tort
particular) described as lot 6, block 3 of the replat of
Chapman Addition. i
Carole Busby described the case,
Charlt.s Watkins further described the case, f
Mary Lou Collins, petitioner, requested that the petition be
changed to re uses.- planned development (PD) for office use,
and spoke in favor of her request,
Robert Follett, owner of 1203 Avenue C, spoke in favor of
the request.
Diana Follett, owner of 1203 Avenue C, spoke in favor of the
request.
f
Robert Desidarato, owner of 1502 Avenue C, spoke in opposition• i
He prtretatad a petition of about 60 signatures which opposed'
this request.
i
I
.
Minutes
Page Four
Willemay Crawford spoke in opposition to the request, stating
that she was interested in buying and remodeling the house.
Thelma Willingham spoke in opposition to the requee+t.
} Charles Watkins presented the staff recommendation, which
was denial.
Mary Lou Collins spoke in rebuttal.
Linnie McAdams felt that there is still a possibility of a
single family home being built there. Linnie further stated
she.falt the interest of the home owners outweighed the
interest of the petitioner,in this r4rticular case.
Marilyn Gilchrist moved to deny Z-1469. Motion was seconded
by Linnie McAdams and carried unanimously. (4-0)
C. Z-1470. Tnis is the petition !I Mr. Bob Millar requesting, 3
a change of zoning from sngle family (SF-7) to two-fam~1 (24) f
classification on lots 1 and 2, Bolivar North Addition. The
property is located on the east side of Bolivar Street in the
2600 Block.
Carola Busby described the case,
l
Charles Watkins described the case further.
Bob Miller spoke in favor of the petition, stating that there
is a need for duplaxea for young couples who cannot afford to
buy a single family home.
No one spoke in opposition.
Charles Watkins presented the staff report and stated that
there were duplexes nearby.
Linnie McAdams stated that she was not opposed, j
Jack Miller moved to approve Z-1470. Motion was seconded
by Linnie McAdams and carried unanimously, (4-0)
Z-1471, This is the petition of Mr. Fred W. Vaughan
requesting a chin p of toningg from agricultural (A) to
light industrial ~LI) classification, The parcel stint on
the north side hf the corner of FM 1113 and the Interstate-35
service road ar,d is approximately 1.8 acres in site.
f Carole Busby described the cue.
Charles Watkins further described the case.
Fred Vaughan spoke in favor of his request, stating that the
change would allow tre selling of horse shade and barns.
Linnie McAdams asked Mr, Vaughan why commercial (C) toning
classification would not be adequate.
71,
1
Minutes
` Page Five
r Mr. Vaughan replied that buyers may come with livestock
and stay overnight, and comrercial zoning classification
would not allow this.
i
Motion was made by Jack Miller and seconded by Marilyn
► Gilchrist to approve Z-1471. Motion failed by a vote of
3 - 1 (Miller Lusby, and Gilchrist voted to approve, McAdams
voted to deny.
Jack Miller moved to approve the zoning re ueat from
agricultural (A) to commercial (C) classification. Motion
was seconded by Martlyr. Gilchrist and carried unanimously,
F. Z-1473. This is the petition of Mr. Robert Justice
requesting a change of zoning from two family (2-F) to
multi family restricted (MF-R) classification on i pat-cel
located along the west side of Barnard Street beginning
approximate. 195 feet north of the intersection of Parvin Et
f and Barnard treats. The propartyy is more particularly
described as Block 8, lots 6, 90 10, and 11, Southpark
Addition.
f Robert Justice spoke in favor of the petition. l
i
Billy Wilhaim,,owner of 2403 Leslie, spoke in opposition to I
the request. f
i Charles Watkin3 presented the staff report)
Robert Jretice spoke in rebuttal,
Motion was made by Linnia McAdams and seconded by Marilyn,
Gilchrist to deny 2.1473. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0)
0 Hold a public hearing concerning five amendments to the
sign regulations of the zoning ordinanrel
Motion Was made by Jack Miller and seconded by Linnie McAdams
to table the ordinance repealing Article 11, C, 11 of the II
Zoning Ordinance Appendix B of the Code of 0rdinanees of the
City of Denton, 'texas effective Januaryy 1,19861 and trohibiting
portable signs effective January 1, 198b.' Motion care ad
unanimously.
Carole busby asked if there was anyone to soeak it favor of in
opposition of the other four amendments to this sign regulations
of the zoning ordinance. I
Yao.-ton Doekett spoke in opposition to the amendments. .il
Mr. Smith spoke in opposition to the amendments.
Bob Ingram spoke in opposition to the amendments.
Cliff Redding spoke in opposition to the amendment to the
political sign ordinance,
r
I
I
~y y N~11111~ '
i
1
a
Minutes
' Page Six
Ross Melton spoke in opposition to the amendments.
ne public hearing was closed.
1 The Commission decided to vote on each amendment separately.
#1 An ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance Appendix B
of the Code of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended by
1 adding a new subsectio regulating political -signs on residential "
zoned ProPertYt any; .;aolarint3 an effective date.
.
It was agreed that "if any" on the fifth line of paragraph N.
would be deleted, Linnie McAdams moved to approve and Jack
Miller seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously, (4-0)
#2 An ordinance amending Article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance
of the City of Denton, Texas, by adding a new subsection.M
regulating special civic event temporary signs located on
residential property] and declaring an effective date.
Suggestions To delete "advertise any particular business or
t product if" on the sixth and seventh line of paragraph M,, and
to rep lace it with the word "be", Also add Mr-1 t6`zonin
classifications listed. Oilchrf.st moved to approve the! amendment
as modified; Miller seconded de motion; the motion failed {
t (Gilchrist, McAdams and Miller voted to approve; Busby voted
G- to deny).
03 An ordinance amending Article 17 l of the Zoning Ordinance
apppandix 3 of the Code of the City of Denton, Texas, regulating
a3 ns located within a front yard area; and providing for an
p of active data.
Motion was made by Gilchrist to table this amandmantt Linni•
McAdams seconded the motion motion failed by a vote of 31- 1
(Gilchrist, McAdams, and Miller voted to table, Busby voted
not to table).
#4 An ordinance amending Artiole 17, C, 11 of the Zoning
Ordinance, Appendix B of the, Code of the City of Denton Texas,
regulating temporary signs; and providing for an effective data,
r Motion was made by McAdams to approve motion was seconded b
Y
Gilchrist and carried unanimously. (4-0)
I
111. Considerationai
A, Consider final plat approval of Denton South Addition and
site plan approval for a portion of PD-6,
li
Motion was made by Linnie McAdams, and seconded by Marilyn
Gilchrist to approve the final plat of Denton South Addition.
Motion carried vrtanimously.
David Dunning spoke in favor of the site pltn for a portion
of PD•60 stating that he had met with the property owners
and was agraeabis to some changes, Theta changes arat
{
I
B Minutes
t Page Seven
v
1, The building will face the highway so noise will funnel
out onto the highway.
j 2. A brick fence in the rear will separate the single family
homes from the CO=srcial property.
` 3. Pole sign height will be reduced.
4. The rear door of the building will be used as a fire door
the main entrance and exit for customers will face the highway.
4 Herbert Jockey, Vice Praiident'of Homeowners Association, I
spoke concerning the *its plan for PD-6. The main concern
was noise.
Greg Edwards, City Engineare expressed concern about.the access E
to the property. He stated that t.e had met with the Highway
Deppartment but that a solution has not been arrived at., He
asked the Commission to table this item until a decision was ,
arrived at. s
The Commission discussed the matter with Mr. Dunning.
Linnie McAdams moved to table the approval of the site plan {
for PD-6, Jack Miller seconded the motion and it carried;
unanimously. (4-0)
k The meeting adjourned at 4t00 p.m, 1
1
1
F'' 40 1.
f
i
&TANI
Minutes
j Planning and Zovemberon5ing198Commission
The regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was held on
November 5, 1980 at 5:00 plm, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
„
PRESENT: Linnie McAdams, Bob Woodin, Jack Miller, Carnle Busby, Robert Worts
1•, and Marilyn Gilchrist. Staff present were: Jeff Meyer, Greg Edwards,
David Ellison and Susan Wigand. I
ABSENT. Andy Sidor.
E
Carole Busby called the meeting to order and explained the procedural policy for
the meeting.
1. Approve the minutes of the October 151 1980 meeting.
The minutes were amended by adding the word "or" to the 12th paragqraph
t on page five. Motion wes made by Linnie McAdams and seconded by ecb
Woodin to approve the minutes as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
11. Public Hearings.
i
A. Hold a public hearing to consider an ordinance repealloS Article 17,'C,
nences of the City
of Dof the enton,Zoning Ordinance, effective J Aanuaryx1, 0 of 10861eandCode
prohibiting portable signs
effective January 1, 1986.
Cliff Redding spoke in opposition to the ordinance.
Marion Brockett spoke in opposition.
Jeff Meyer stated brat the reason fa; the ordinance 1s that portable signs
are unsightly and a nuisance haaardl there is also a problem.in entoroing
the existing ordinance dealing with portable signs.
Bob Woodin expressed concern over the legality of prohibiting portable
signs altogether.
Linnie McAdams stated that several cities have ordinances which prohibit
portable sigisd
Jack Miller stated that he felt opposed to this ordinance.
Marilyn 011chr%t agreed that portable signs are not aesthetically
a peatings but felt that small businesses needed them to compete with
tAe larger companies, and therefore was opposed to this ordinance.
Bob Woodin moved to recommend to the City Council that this ordinance
not be adopted, Bob Le Forte seconded the motion and the motion carried ;
by a vote of 4 o 2 (Bob 'doodin, Jack Miller, Marilyn Gilchrist and
Robert Worts voted in f,tvori Linnie McAdams and Carole Busby voted
In opposition.)
i
One Two
B. S-148, This is the petition of Mr. Charles N. Davis Jr, requesting a
specific use permit which would allow a concrete batch plant at 406 East
Sycamore Street. The property is more particularly described as County
Tract 64 in the Hiram Cisco Survey - A 1184.
Don Davis, Charles Davis' son and officer of Denton Concrete Company,
spoke in favor of the petition.
E. W, Morrison, Jr., Chairman of Morrison Milling, spoke in favor of
the petition.
No one spoke in opposition,
Jeff Meyer p esented the staff report, recommending two conditions if the
Commission chose to Approve S-148;
11 All state and federal regulations regarding construction of new facilities
which may emit a-ir contaminants shall be met, and 2) after construction of the
new bitch plant, the old plant shall only be operated on a periodic basis.
Notion was made by Linnle McAdams and seconded by 8 6foodin t$ appr~ve
S-148 with the oaodtttoa" recommendeedd by staff. Mo on caeria un n mously.
C. 7.1474. This is the petition of Mr. J, A. Miller re uesting`a change of
:oplh from single fe)Hly (SF-7) to commercial C) classification on a parcel
totaling approximately 1.4 acres in size located along the north side of Lindsey
Streit beginnin approximately 190 feet west of the intersection of Lindsey
and Fort Worth Drive. ! f
J. A. Miller spoke in favor of the petition stating that he 6lshes to construct
warehouses.- 1
0. J, Honaker spoke in favor of the petition.
i
No one spoke in opposition,
Jeff Meyer presented the staff report and recommended that the Planni and
Zoning Commission modify the request to a chango of 'toning to planned development
(PD) for commercial use with the following conditions
1, A six foot solid fence shall be constructed along the western perimeter
of the site prior to issuance of building permit,
2, Site plan approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council shall be waived.
The petitioner agreed to the change.
Laforts moved to approve Z-1474 as modified with the two conditions,
Gilchrist seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
D, S•1496 This is the petition of Mr, Warren Searls requestim9 a specific
use The permit t.v alload 04 peration of a day care center at 2230 Lit Ak St,
y
and i11 of 1ois23ote particularly described bd as the out 66 feet of lot 22
Warren Seat Ii spoka in favor of the request,
The resident at 2278 'nest Oak spoke in opposition to the request.
1
Page Three
E. W. Morrison Jr. appeared on behalf of his mother who lives at 2245 West r_
Oak, spoke in opposition to the request.
Bill Wilson spoke in opposition to the request.
Jeff Meyer presented the staff report.
Warren Searls spoke in rebuttal.
Carle Busby stated that she knew there was a need in Denton for good,
lic i day care centers, but also stated there is property in Denton
w •opropriately toned.
Bob k~ moved that the petition be approved. Motion died for lack of
a sac i.
Linnle McAdams moved to deny S-149. Jack Miller seconded the fiction and
it carried unanimously.
Bob Woodin left at this time,
E Z•1475. This is the petition of Epsilon Dolts ousing CofooiOstiony single family (SF-7) to l requesting a change of zoning from Oak Street.
The petitioner is'also famil
(M.F-R) classification at 2040
requesting a specific use permit for a fraternity at 2040 West Oak St, '
44 The property is more particularly described as tract 110 E. Nchaskl i
Survey, Abstract 996.
Wetter Abby, president of Epsilon Delta Housing Corporation, spoke In
favor of the request. j
E
Steve Glick, representing the owner, spoke in favor of the request.
` Bill Wilson spoke in opposition to the request.
Paul Silveroail spoke in opposition to the request.
E. G. Ballard spoke in opposition to the request and presented a petition 1 ,
opposing the request.
j
Elinor Calmbach Reinmiller spoke in opposition to the request. {
George Stewart spoke in opposition to the request.
Approximately 20 people stood in opposition to the request.
Jeff Meyer presented the staff report nd recsmondation, which was denial, 4
i
No one spoke in rebuttal. '
Linnie McAdams stated that she is opposed to spot toning and therefore Moved
t " to deny the'requsst. Motion was seconded by Jack Miller and carried by a -I
vote of 4 • 0 garilyn Gilchrist abstained).
III, Considerations:
A, Consider renaming part of Paisley Street `Old Paisley street".
i
i
Page Four
Robert La Forte moved to rename the street "Old Paisley streeto; motion
was seconded by Marilyn Gilchrist and carried unanimously.
B. consider final plat approval of Wimbleton Village Phase Ill.
I
Greg Edwards presented the staff recomndationY
Robert LaPorte moved to approve the final plat of Wimbleton,Village Phase
Marilyn Gilchrist seconded the motion and it carried unanimdusly.
The meeting adjourned at 7.00 p.m.
j
0 1
A
z
i
:I
1
.e
A v n.
I 'olan to expri.es m;, opposition to tht. prodo3eu oruinancc that %till prohibit all
portable sii;ns Ill the oity li.nit3 of u!:ato.i, ';baas, t feel treat trio oraiuancE'
Cun5titULe3 a violation of uq riL1,t to cu;n:jot ba3iab3a in a reasonable, fair anu
sale Inar+nc>z , rurtai,lb ait,ns art. vital. to Vie, suomss of my business ano r6prestilt
~ E
a most aiforuable inecuts of advertiuiitr+.so so
j airnature urine (t'rinteul Lusineas Auureas
3
+
i r
F. es 1'h i wi U1ulLeu" .MATT-.44-0-t~
1~1nf~1a ~n~~rkl R,r~
' / ~ •~r ~ r.~1~1:1G1~ r~-a~Cti['ll". ~a'lM~ /i.ff4f).,.a'. ;~C7/ «•~'•'n/(... .
All,
.f.
1 '
I
f
t
1
I IT to l Ili SUYYUIiI~I 4~e' Grl't~►r.. p V' .7
III prOltibit sll
I %doh to cr.,j:,vw :iy o,lposition to the ro o::e: orulnazct that %1
r
portable emus iri tltie city plaits of utitoa, 'ieaae, i fo=ol that 111E oruinanub
constitutco violation of my riLIA 10 ccn'uct busineay irl a reaaonabla, lair ana J
safe mannta-4 rortalole siLns are vital to VLO succes of, my bvsirlrso Lino repruaent #
a most affo"ablc ,tans oi' auvertiuinl,6060 4 40 6 1 4 1
SiGnature AwL (rrinteu} uusineus tiauresa
i
A ,e R: r f~P I r SS`r t; f Ll nz i u das t 1 `i
JAI
• - e~ VJ vet~a~at, c,clc..L u'll~ r oY s i
) ttwkd~c~
~~fr9.~,ds~,[t
A) ley
1
14
r s a E~
ONP
-rn F D,
4741
1 I v. ,
"f,, , 1 ~~(7; t ~ f,1,Iti~,o ~ P1►. I , r.v ~,;~+(~1Pi(. ♦ A41i1u3~; Wit.-,
33
i
own
i'
i
planning and Zoning Commission
Recommendation to the City Council
Z-1474
December 2. 1980
Identity and Location:_ Z-1474
This is the petition of Mr. J. A. Miller requesting a change of zoning from
single family ($F-7) to planned development (PD) for commercial use on a ppaarcel
totaling approximately 1.4 acres In size located along the north side of Lindsey
Street beginning approximately 190 feet west of the intersection of Lindsey
and Fort Worth Drive.
Report: ;
The site in this request 1s vacant. Surrounding land use includes Intent land`
to the north and west, a motel to the south and a union local to the east.
The property can be served with waters sewer$ end electrical from Lindsey Street i .
I and there is adequate capacity to the lines. t
III In the absenci"of specific plans for the property It 1j difficult to asiass
traffic iegct, however my proposed commercial devel~~pment will generate more ;
traffic than if the property is developed according to the current low density „
residential zoning. j
Give" surrounding land use the Planning and Zoning Commission felt this was a ; } ti 1
reasonable regosst with the following conditions: s
1 A six foot solid fence shalt be constructed along the western perimeter of
the site prior to sisuance of building permit. I
.
2. Site plan approval shalt be waived
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommerds soproval of 2,1474. j.
a
! i
I
E
i
i
i
i
M i
( I
I
!
I
1'~ ' 'Y er y'.~ M, * A f err S
6
. v
Y
r
I x. s T' I d RJR,
1 s1 a, iu~nB. .r1+j11 r4 .1,~ r
yr r 1 r~l ka R'Y
n
111641 ja
r M1°rY 1~,y~t I I~ q r t
r t F
A 1
r
it 1 ~ ~ I ^ ~~r.S T
'
. j ,
.
.
j Fr
i. .i.'~~` 'irk „►'hlyt i r~ i
y .-J ~ra
+ t
ii
6
stow
} JS . r I i~ ~ I ~ 1
IlIF,#!~~
Will: I
¢ fff F E ~ T / +r rN r
%
1
r ~I
' ~ Irj " 1k1 7•'~~~j .x
(rpg n 'r
S
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
Z-1474
ED
'N[ FAVOR IN OPPOSITION WE I-D
8111 Payne I i
520 Fort Worth Drive
► Denton, Texas 16201
L {
# j
1
f
4 i
I{
~ I
v
REPLY FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
` Case, No. Z-1474
The Denton City Council would like to receive your comments on this case
i in order that it may make an informed decision on the zoning petition,
If you desire to express an opinion, please complete this reply form and
I return tt to the following addreos by the date of the public baaring.
City Planner
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney
Dentou, Texas 76201
t ,
x
If 20% 4r more of,the property owners receiving this notice return
reply form in o osition to the proposed change, the City Council must
att&Ln a four-f5 i~the (h/ 5) vote to approve'it, if you submitted a reply
form for consideration by the 'Planning and Zoning Commission, those com
meat: are a sufficient response and will be presented to the City Council.
If your opinion about the care has changed you are encouraged to uas
this form to notify us concerning your position.
If If you have questions pertaining to the Casa, please call the Planning
Office at 556-8350
0
Please use BLACK ink only, A
E since blue ink cannot be xeroxed.
18PLY +
M (am in favor of this zoning request.
I ant opposed to this zoning request.
I am undecided about this zoning raquest,
My cogmt.rits are as follaws ,
I
r
,
r'
Signatu a
yXl r~ ` ,
Addross
Phone
M
WWI
! a
j YW, A. k.
,
AeA.gigh
I id 4 -IAI A. Ad i.,
r
AL ell ilftlfk
f
4
A AA 2A i
#,,.I
d I!
IAA 4
i
C
i
E
{
i
r
v
i
1
\ U
~ CITY OF DF,NTON
MEMORANOT4
. s>
DATE OF METING.- August 26. 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA XTEM (USE EXACT WORDINO AS XTEN IS TO BE PLACED ON AGn
Consider the recommendation of the Traffic Safety Suppotlt COmmiSSien to Close
Piney Creek Blvd. at the intersection of Piney Creek and San Gabriel
1 1
SUAtMA.kYt
The Traffic Commission revf6wed this request of Township 14 residents, After .i
looking at several alternatives, they voted to recommend to the Council that.
Piney Creek Blvd. be closed an an interim measure to help eliminate -largo
amounts of traffic, speeding, and litter problems caused by traffic to the Mall;
FISCAL SUMMAkYt .
The only cost to the City would be to errect'the permanent=type barricade at this
location. Estimated cost would be from $200-300.
' i
ACTION REQUXREn1
f If the Council would like to close Piney Creek Blvd, they should direct the City
Attorney to draw up an ordinance for the next Council meeting.
ALTERNATIVES:
Not to close the street and leave all streets open for Public use,
!
!
STAFF RECOMMEID)ATtONSt
in' the mid 701s) Township II was plated as a ;residential nelohoorhood'AdjaGeili: to
the Mall, At the time of plating, Piney Creek Blvd, was shown as connecting to
San Gabriel. This was before any housing was started and therefore most of the
residents were aware of the street rtterns,
p 'Current speed fimtts in the tub'
division are the, standard 30 mph and if observed by alli traYflc Vould probably '
not constitute any major safety problems, However, since there are manpower,
shortages in the Police Department and since people do have a tendancy to speed
on Son Gabriel, the Council may want to consider the measure on a temporary basis.
t:><HlBtrs,
II Memo to Chris Hartung !
lil ifinutos of Traffic Safety Support Commissio
i
}
Y
1 ;
I
CITY OF DENTON
~ MEMORANDUM
f
TO: G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
C ` DATE: August 21, 1980
RE: Consider the recommendation of the Traffic Safety Support Corranission
to close Piney Creek Blvd. at the intersection of Piney Creek and
San Gabriel
h
con-
At thou meeting on August 131 the Traffic Safety Support Corunission
sidered the request from residents of Township if to close Pio ty Creek
Blvd. The residents stated that there are large amounts of traffic in
particular on San Gabriel, using this as a means to get to tho Golden
Triangle Mall. Residents complained of excessive speedingf ti ter and
large volume of traffic. The Commission looked at several dif erent !
alternatives and recommended that Piney Creek be closed as an interim
measure.
ave
w ~
I
t
{
f ,
10
Z_ik
MINUTES
CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION
h WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 13, 1980
k, 1;15 P.M.
r # E
E PRESENT: Bill Midgett, Chairman, Warren Searles, George Terry, Rolando
Esteves, Pat Cheek, Charles Keener, Traffic Safety Coordinator,
Secretary
h NOT PRESENT: John Hughes, Jim Wilson, Robbie Robinson
P
i
1. , Motion was made by Searles and seconded by Terry TO APPROVE THE MINUTE:;
OF JUNE 25, 1980. Motion passed unanimously.
2. Pat Cheek was sworn in,
3. David Fair addressed the commission concerning a curb cut on the west
s e o arroll Blvd, between Hickory and Oak, Motion was made by Keener
and seconded by Esteves to SUGGEST TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THE CURB CUT BE
ALLOWED. Motion passed unanimously.
4. Bob Garsee.of 1513 San Gabriel spoke concerning the excessive speeding
an3 traT fc pproblems that have occurred since the malt opened, He
I suggested a 3-way stop at the intersection of Rio Grande and Angelina
Bend.
Mar Lou S lli an spoke requestingg a sign at Rio Grande at Dallas Drive.
3'he also wan s o ppropose to the State Highway Department to have the
access road at Da11as Drive be made 2-way.
firs, Hoops on Olmos Creek spoke saying that the traffic is so bad at times
at she cannot back out of her driveway,
Lee Storer at 1500 Angelina Bend owns lots that he is building on and that
t Se Vaffi c is quite heavy in that area. pie requested 2-way traffic on
the, Dallas Drive access road.
Motion was made by Searles and seconded by Terry to REQUEST TO THE COUNCIL
TO PUT UP A TEMPORARY BARRIER Tn CLOSE PINEY CREEK AT SAN GABRIEL JND PUT
UP A SIGN DESIGNATING A DEAD END STREET, Motion passed unanimously. f
Motion was made by Searles and seconded by Keener to recommend TO THE COUNCIL
' TO MAKE THE ACCESS ROAD AT DALLAS DRIVE 2- WAY: Motion passed 44, with the
Chairman not voting,,
5, Kat Goldman addressed the Commission concerning the Northridge and
ee ee area, She explained the alternate thoroughfare plan she had
for that area, this is to be studied by the Commission and discussed
at the next meeting.
j
r
T
\ r
I
1
• ~ 4
r 1G fill
D
!''r M
%ski
1 i r~ Ir
~r 1 ~ .~4 I~fY`+:,f +e.;~~' '"w~ ~ - : 1~i a ~wr''1rq r ~ R ~ ~ 3
51
,
~i'~'i`~~ II'•~ =I~a f'I' IJI~ 111 111 ~ .,..w,
x • r r ' - ~ •Ir I' 1' H !li rli iii" ir~i I .
i
Page 2
Minutes Continued
6. Motion was made by Keener, closed by Searles to have BILL MIDGETT CHAIRMAN OF
THE COMMISSION AGAIN. Motion passed by acclaimationr
Motion was made by Keener and closed by Esteves to have PAT CHEEK AS VICI
CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION. Motion passed by acclaimation•
Meeting adjourned at 3:10 P.M.
p
1 11 }ee
1
f
I
i F: r.
.r.r
.r w
vi
r
t ~ I 1.
i
I
a
I
December 2, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 1
SUBJECTI
i Adoption of an Ordinance Abandoning a Utility easement on
Property Located Southwest of the Loop 208 and Audra Lane.
SUMMARYt;
I I
The property owner of this tract of approximately 32 acres is
in the process of developing it and requested that easements
not in use be abandoned in return for dedicating a 70' wide
easement 1380' long on his plat along the route of the
existing 60' wide right of way of the 69KV line and the
proposed TMPA 139KV line.
FISCAL SUMMARY i
Not applicable.
ACTION RLQUIRED!
Approver by the City Council that the attached Ordinance be
approved.
ALTkkAhTI VE9
Not applicable.
RICOFiMMOATIONt
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of November 25
1980, recommended to the City Council that the attaches
Ordinance be approved,
Respectfully,
yr
V
r.4 R. B1. Nelson
Director of Utilities
1XHIIIItsi I memo C,J, Taylor- 10/31/80
1 It Ordinance ,
Tel
&IJ
DY
CITY OF DFNTON
MEMORANDUM
DRTEi October 31, 1980
TO: Ernie Tullos, Asst. Director, Utilities
i
FROM: C. J~ Taylor, Jr./ City Attorney
SUBJLCTi Ordinance Vacating and Abandoning Public
Utility Easements
At/thched is a copy of an ordinance for your agenda providing that
a portion of land dedicated as p-ablic utility easements be vacated
and abandoned
C. JI TAYL R JR.
`i CJTJR1erf ,
p`
_i
p {
III
p
•
Wesel
i
.l voce s ~ ~
ITATI OF TEXAS I
CC9NTY Or uluz A 1 PVCH RE, the underiigned, a Notary Put•lia ithin and for amid
County and state, on this 16th day of May, 1947, personally appeared D.L~ Monroe to roe known
to be the identical person who executed the within and foNSolns instrument, and duly acknov-
lodged to pal that he eretuted the sait as his free and voluntary sot and deed for the usts,
purposes, and consideration therein expressed end sot forth,
odae my hand and seal of ofrice the day at+air last abovt written.
' i r
deal If,.. 1. Davis
My Commissien expireal June 19 1947, Notary Public. i
PILED FOR ARCCAD, Colober 24, 1949 at 9109 A.N. I '
f'
AECOALLGI November :9, 1949 at :127 ►.M,
a Cletus I, Knight I
Cltrits Co-i-ty Cmurt
Denton County, Texas,
t..
p4010 • 1481MT 46
TMI ITM or TEXAS I
COUNTY Of GINTON ) SNOW ALL MEN BY TRUN PRTS1NTdt
THAT we, the underlignod (either one or bore) 1.1, Patterton and rite Nancy may Iet,tarle t`
(husbahd and vita){ for a good Ind valusbte aonsiderationf the rmotlot of which Is hereby to• t
knowlsdssdt do hereby grant unto grates Aiver Transmission Ileattfi Coopsratlve, :no., a ao-
operative aarporstion, whole Oostattloe idd Nis Is Visa, Tests, laid to lit auaotsaori or as-
I signal the rl"ht to enter upon the Linda of the uAdiraisned, sitaatod In the County of Denton
j Its(o of Toaasa And more Iarlleniarly desoribad is followee
ill that certain tract or parcel of land situated in Denton County, Taxat, tort of lootion i?
45t M.N,p, a) P.Idt, Conoany Survey, Abltrmot No. 9271 end part of a 72009 here trial fonieytd
by 1J, Chastain and Vito T. W.R.Orr, by deed recorded in Iceds 160 pass i
273 of the Deed ,
1 p t 9e
fords of Denton County, Texas,
I201N101101 at the northust corner of said 73,09 Bore tract In the earth line of said M.
11J, A P.R.R. Company Survey, $motion 45, and the south line of the A.1, Lonsbotton eutytyI
TIIgNCl Routh 09.3/4 delrass Wsss with aid lint And the riddle, of p'mllo rasa 1317, were! I r
the bertheilt corner of a treat of 40 fatal oft the wait aide of said 72,09 sees trade, Vhlah
If I Viral Borth Of iroe stake !b the south lint of gild reads
I TM&NCI mouth with the oils lira of said 40 gets tim i to
f 4,1 Yalta to eh iron stake let in
I j
south lips at said 77.09 tore treat , the moutheut earner of SAW 40 rare tuott !11
TID:NCS Raet 'with sold line 359 Viral Ieuthesst Garner of amid 73,09 airs tlaftt
T)IINCI Perth 2 decries fast col viral to tho sues of begtnbtns 2nd eontainint 39,44 A-
Greg of land, being the am* land conveyed by tip, tits and wile, YArtho Co Me to D.L. AeV ,
Aid wife, 04th Aov by dud shown of record in Yet, 333, pigs 163, toot Aefords,DOnton County,
Toxii, Icing the fare land tonveysd by D,L, Now it e,1 to S.W. Satiation And wife Raney I%y t
Sattfrtoo, j
(The CoopitstiY4 will pay Crontora 1%,04 par pole of slay Vito pitied in cultivated lAbd
And 11.00 per pelt or suy wire pU403 ill pasture land, when poise of guy vitas areris%#) Va 1 f
oar Y>
and to aonetruct, operate and maintAln on the above•detertbod lands And In or upon All atraate (
roods or highways Abutnlne laid lards, an eititrid transmission or distribution line or ayste
AM Is Asal. . eanate And,yyf,aL.tn!.n uta _lands. annchorJ tube end auv vl pea necal
ar
i
1
`.i a `'i7 Vu.•rl.'r+'nF~T!ar'T'°T'r"ta^r'^~5. I'•{^' ! } 11
d s
\ r I ~Y~~3'1}+:►t}~~r~+a~Jq{Ll iyfj,f'1 ~'ir 'Skf>r+.~i l~~~~f~t~rCr, t t„~ 1 t
w ' 7P' s n; ;~Lat I f' „T"~'.-~C'''S,•x•n'`'` 1,.1'."' ,se' r r'~1+> , y,., '4
7- 7
y f ~~a•Y'j J'~`ft' f+'1 (',l~ \.S'v"u. I r`{:>i/f7Y r.1'' __r fyi r ;
1{ / ~ `Y L t rr
t ..r • ;,`i 1;1 j'' tl~. M rr~' 4~S1,Cr~ / r
i ~ Y ~ 'L+1'~ ~IR"1C~7r-~L wb 1 ._.WSIL! ~ +WY~}i. I /
{ nUD ?DR RIC'Y D'i d+ y~ of A.Dr1959 at oteltxk QiM
•'6EC0AXEDe C dar at~~t A D,1939 ato lotklf.
J B+rn+tE;Cl+is Coounty, oust
1 ; brt.. ' D+yuty countf. !u},Y.a~►a+4
{ rgt"~"j^ f'tq*.','•T a RA1"♦,..t~Q•{i `j '1" A t t 1R~' `tom"' • r r 1 : • t ' , . I •A',
f 1.. r t 'I a7 ~~/~y'~♦~~ i' 1 ~ 9!1
j{ ~ 'ST ,}~L P+, t r3 ^R'T'-4a ♦ , r ~L ,t1t ~iF I!r r a •
i
' f` tr ~,rr ,x\ .q is t ,
w ~2M S.xI lc CltCa"Y ".~y~' -+r~: Y y r
Ar,
:T_1?~ ' ~ ♦J, i r, t ,~y:~ i'r~ h .~~'9 ~L`~~t_t.e 'W ~%~r~ ~ ' t' `
L:~c1~t::!!~~!! 'n!'h'' l2'i1, ♦r •il~•"`•n r_ , t
l;r.7A~„ r t"'F'.EfiAL'}•.t'd.ett•.e..s_T"{_',fl J" ^.'[f t/1~ ~Y t• i'w
t' A/I
yr, rP'
~~aa . r f^' • Ci ~,,r q„tf'~^"~ r rat PR •
;.1 \ i t.a4.♦ ;`,N'!r'i"1Y ~r~`r '+'1.; J~$ t .1'RM'i" _ J 5's
t •1'{ (rn .n: 7+ ,~v of `x r j~~ il~ r 'O ,
v~ S !y,7W,r ~r'.+'[`~~1C' l7'iS.I.r LL 1 r.`• ^-"„Y ;I~ ' i .ra
"1 %4
t rt ~ w yt i♦r 4~ 'j ^!~~'~a",~tt1p'r""~~ .ia7f'+)4 .f } Ja rT 'C"i.M~r r , ~ ~
Tt`Y{Y Y.(C h~ 1 fp , ...1"'r .4 r ♦ I t` 1 a r ~ + r t •
..r. t ~r i•+ "l.Y {f.,t1 I ' vtl;r 1 ~Vf'~'4.^LG'; ll~~J u~ t. 4 r~I ! to- I
9~9^'\ ~ v r , I r i ~ ~ S ' ~sltt 1, (r s , ! r lry1''~
p .l • t t~~ V wl F~~~~ 1t. I ~l ~ ~t~a♦ V Y j,.r 1 ~ 9
I~.^ / r a'`~ r. '4Y ~h.'.7J~~ ! • r l.,, ~ r . ; 1. < t~ rq+?~~
rr y ~ ..~Y t 'e •P r1 1 5 1/t~'IJ. ~ /O r f
r r rY I~t d r t *it,
I ! ~H ,t t 4C11~,I ~~r ,ti~ 'y ~1 t 1.~rlOr t~' r + h A~~ L f ~~1v L LI• t )j~
ti , /.r t v fffi~..'ff Ilv " 7i ~fY4r^. /y~ffA ~ J k." ~ f~Y ~t•
' F% 1~/•'{+,{,~'r r1 x".n' Ytx, G}• f~\. f ti Kr..jL.r , 1r'•\ r \ '„_~r
r
5i~ a wryr4{"✓ rn t~~~. Nye I?
k v ryl`+'r` ' ♦ 'r tr:~fsinsl ~f 1+~ `t c t ! I
1
it ~ 1'}' \r.l r ~^f N+r! h _ tr ~7nj•`tr?~^r9^'j t t ,'r , . c I
, k 1t\ t{ , • 1 r`L~ u+ ' d`Jt' ~ jf i/f '..r" .GF~1- .I~~~K it r ..q ~.r r 1
' , r L~~,_~ 1: 'K`~~-!.►~~ ~ ~~~..~'Yi'L`,1.Y~~Y-F ~;..{iwyr \ ~r 4
i` Jy ~"rr,'Yr "Y~ ~~>~~"A!'~ i+tµn•n"y~~tt+._~. > n ->,i
+ I. wh~F~{.}ti~ri~,, r.a ~J'~, L~•+:rr'~' ~~'~y.3~.y1.5 +E+ i~ l4
5
{ r ' fS~ .Y y ~ ~y~~~7,{~y~,kq•is f, .Y+~!,~er~,, J.~~r :.I I~L»' x~
a Y , tyl. •rI f r,, .rJ..%:~t t. y....e.ti,.iw~^,1" ¢ [.y ! v 11r~„~...._.
I ~ v v t~~~. ~I"x1't.r ~N I' ,..~yy ~ •~1 . ~ r t
I
• "~~~;~y;nrr .~~`--i.it.`•ri+w •fi+C-. " ~F~~.,e.OWi.IIiiLi sSr~`7dr x,, r .
n... wool
r
NO.
AN ORDI%4M:CB PROVIDING THAT ALL RIGHT, TITLE, AND INTEREST OF
THE CM OF DENTON IN LAND IIERETOFORE DEDICATED` AS PUBLIC TS BE
AND TIIISIORD NANCErSHALL BECOHE EFFECTIVABAN E INMUiAT LY PROVIDING THAT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of-Denton, Texas, has
been requested by tha owners of•adjoining property to vacate
and abandon a public utility easement over ■ portion of the.
hereinafter described tract of land; and
WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Denton, Texas, is' `
,
of the opinion that the best Interest and, welfare of the public
will be served by vacating and abandoning said public utility
easement ov.r the hereinafter described tract of land; NOW
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 11.
That the Tight, titla, and interest of the City' of Denton,
Texas, to use the easements described in the following
instruvents, to•uit.
1. Easement a tied February 1, 10660 from Stanferd Hauptman
to Brazos, ,r t Power Cooperative, Inc., of record in
a Volume S36 $66 of the peed Records of Denton, County,
{ w Texas; .
1. Easement from J. P. Site and ieifi Hartha is itt to Texas
Power and Light Company of Tecord in Volume 3560 Page 407
of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
S. Easement from V. E. sotterson and wlla Nancy May
Iattarson to Brazos River TransmtsaIon Electric
Cooperative, inc., of record in Volume 357, Page 41 of the
Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
4. Easement from Jesse Cagle to Texas Power and Light 1
Company of record In Volume 443, Pace 661 of the Dead
Records of Denton County, Texas;
are hereby abandoned and permanently vacated as public utility
easements of any kind or character forever.
1.
SECTION-1
I
That the easements over that portion of said tracts of land
herein described are hereby abandoned and released and will
revert to the odfacent oower or owners as provided by law,
SECTION! it I.
that portion of the public utility easements herein
described heing vacated, abandonod, and closed is made subject
i
S ra r k r'f
h
r ~ 1
r
i
ar~
to all existing zoning regulations and deed restrictions, If '
any, and subject to all existing easement rights of others, if
t any, whether apparent or not.
SECTION IV.
This ordinance shall take effect and bo In fu11 force and
effect from and after the date of its passage, and it is so
ordained.:.
PASSED AND ,APPROVED by the City Council of the City of
Denton, Texas, this the day of _ 1080.
MAYOR
CITY OF DE,YTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CI1Y OF DENTON, TEXAS Ei?CJY3 ~ q
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C, J. TAYLOR, JR,, CITY ATTORNEY
LITY ON DENTON, TEXAS e,
1 BY~.~• tr.;
i t.
i
1
1
f
.
ET G NEERIM,C IUM j
WORK ORDER RFMr-sr
REQUEST FROM, ~~f3L/L u7+~r/•~ - G
M PEPARTM£N,
PERSON TO CONTACT NAME; I3_711/0s _ ExTl ~o/$7
DATE SUBMITTED: /zo/gO
DATE REQUESTED:
DE$CpIPTION OF WORK REQUIRED: _AsAav~~N OLD ~nsewiPJ1~,,,r
n 7~8
382 loge ilco/ Ehs°MEN7 7v' ~ 1-015 N"s Js
(DAj t~¢co20
4.P, CRY &-Sr/u Rid-Als.117
i I
r
LIST OF MATERIALS ENCLOSED" SWjy S~ na 1(h,WN ads.
SIGNA4TURE ,
FOR ENGINEERING DEPAZTIaENT USE
ATE
PERSONNEL DATE ASSIGNED COIPL"CTE
JOB ASSIGNED DRAFTING
FIELD WORK
PROJECT YORK
]•J - a 4•i'i
f 5+~• , 1
nw,
eM N
R
I f
L C 7t•~4td,~.jG~srSlNtltt
~ ~ jRt~ ,~++~t 927
Awl
'16 'POLO, 1 45 1, IF
40 W
r
1 . i - _ _
No. Iz-
h~ , • is
'1 51 M . D ~
~~11 a~ R 4. Sys 492'
41601 Is -
cit
taA
ar
v
• rit4•rj 4W ~
A_E 441. 12 v e~ttllµ4 *-htm `
w;. IL sic tit.o9
I
I ,
44
~ . , ~ ~G/4o t~ivt
06L 4
S~4 1
I ~
I
i
i
,
_ I a a ,l S_2 Ss_ 1~ ;~1 Nl FGS
THE STATE OF TEXAS, PLOW ALL H£N BJ THESE PRESENTS.
COUNTYOF DEH108 t•re'..e.ta,~ -_•r.i..
Stanford H401iWAnn 3v4'2'
THAT
s
y
aL Cev.q, toI I,, here'neflae "1114 '0notar%•hethat "a" mare, IN 6 tool and eduillr a~•
dd"t;otl htrt$y tr.r.U to 117.\205 ELECTRIC POWER COOPCRATL\'t, INC, of P'teo. Tsui. to 4110e5tnt sod r.
tithe of "j, for the p.rpode al eonouv:ang, apenttop God otiaataing as ',mule u1nie41i4e or d:'Iwibutaa Got em. AV
sod metals Crambr4 Land In R.4 Co. Soney, A6etnet Yo 927 Denton Coutly,
Ttaao. Watt p KeviArly dnvOtd Is deed IM CarlAnd Marren at at ts__ttpIIfMA Rq,prm+r,n
Itled:,1&Y} X A_ A. D. it.~~ tt! tecardd lm \'tts c. • •2 Pat+--~~.. Died Retards of said
f Caunty, and aralainlep 31.b64 •cru
The Now Gat at faN eSrtb4 ua+tmtMiaeae Clwibut ea Mv,e srdR be locstomsvws said land is foHoral
BEGINNINO for the Horthetly and of center 1L0411 Of $Aid 60' strip, at A ateat spike
let an the 1.83. of the said M ,P. At P. hR Co Survey In the ranter of Audra Lana
at slid point of entry o9 a[or(aaoefened rawer in'* said paint of bvgttining lying N.
89-55 t. 693.0 feet from the H.W.C. of the tforomentLoned Warren to Hauptaur\et tract.
Thence S. O-St-,46 N. 1183.0 feet with occupied center line of said power line toe 4'
steel tod set is old final lied on the I.B.L. of said Virred to Reuptlano treat, said
Point being the point of exit of amid power ll-a, said point lyVA 5.69.13 E. 881.0
fat from the S.W.C,. of the aforementioned Warren to Rauptms,.ln ttaet.
1, Stanforef Nanptmanne do hereby certify that the tract herein described was act-
naliy surveyed on the Around by me and that the ILmics, corners and boundaries demcr[hed
heroine art truly described.
- to medGdmtion N draapn Nose tuts, o end sltht of or de d.rmed hetdn, the Caopen Uee WM pry to loll result, '
the wend Sveh M,mul $had lonalitete she Ott aene.drralloa of ranGas MA "demist
and rdht of •ty and both. permit swan be malt L Joe IiaoC<h of 6utine1a titer the asetul4e ol this MNMORF ►y M
i
eneter eecepntul Llhit the },sent scone of said gal, a mbe•e dncri6ed. L baud epee 1 prerniNy weney and R +
ItroUnteed that Mid Ceopentl.I ,nay tr ocue Note Una to the Nome moment eAettae 6elert at it may dent all it low
' IwG[lio6. ,
Ten AeF rnh the dtht of Graf red frets ovee Crtmat i aditetnl hide to at Item 44.4 raM of ell Foe the pw. I,
rase el edsatrwllne, Impratinf. teem erveund trptAre, M1Nrdne, t+uoll'te, ed nutntng. ant nmartnp laid lad and
ryiurlemm~tet• Pe rifht K stifles!, u1l Zoe ,n the Mme n'atin /otidon to any t Is.enl caed if and as widenol 4 the
-
rvtvrt, the 4 t a Ir m at to go.s sue N dtu6terr » the event Mttltarf to vi""I pait~l4 Iniuleresu vt,h the i+
ape 1 N Nod an. u» nas•s f<o.6te hoard ahtfila, and Pd right to lama,}. N rre.H1 Pe e6nnteeaom at foq a
6etaner of Jill ran ea nee side at the selual teller 61 ta,/ Use stir dr sG andingt. Overlords of mhtl 66.1r.eelans e.h,th
mil efdtneo 61 Mrvrlur oilh Ne t1kim y. 4hlf. Of eenvvtn4at 6pe11t.l4 sal said Gee and to appvrMntntes IF Path
6v,ldin sonpvrel, v 41ty 6606-vtaent see eantuueted tr Cranlar. Hlhbe Ike 64 Not spite $bill at"?, a •ilA7ov,ot~
l!tic r pri,nen loosest of the Coejjee,tile this the Ceapentl.r Nan te,t she r she to 11261i Mitd If*M loth bale sod
GrtMer ea'MI N Iq le eke Cm'If101 the nllanaVI fail of t.eh rfosAll, end Ike fer4o"9 , wrelho ri,h the /Q.e. J
h e•i ~„..f doh snot, d,an everel1vd t so.ensnl ew,n.nd ..IN the dnJ L.r the Wolf's at W CaopetMMt Ira rvtenun ll
j The r:ghl it htMevrd by G4nIM doss she hod whtil the w foot spats she.. eonited let prnr4l adrierltrsal end
"1"09 y.rptee., plev;drs Ixh He chid net keiyde the cfe.ine of uses ,tueoo at any a,%e, td .filth mrght lnterrtra
a4h I a Hrrtiso ey the C041rou,f of eke righlo welly gnn4d. the OnnMt, hevt.u, rill paf M Pt e.sde of the
lard foe Most dandpns to ranee{, Ike fond sod repine amt 1 whkh 141 en.h in enteNnl open IN, II 'd to At lenalrvelief,
mainunMa of removal of old line I
70 NAVE Ah'D TO HOLD the thole 41exd6. I ee.rmenl col Rmhto ass the use SrnN tldelr{e Peode C"toll
tiro, }10. lit wittlrafe mad IM.dnl, bsof Mid tea Isar. l,t J setaeed t
1 h/ Onaler dew heetbr VI4 6imrlL 6i holes ►id tacJ agrure5ibry to Ws.ranr tnd itrtrlt Defend an L64 •
eheY.ar the 15ovl IeltrDd ,1,4003 mod right %%I-, the Mid [a6penary He iteulNn sad A PL. Ali Holt pttaea
iI. *mMiatrae laaftGy elsimlre u to ai11 164 use 1, of pan mtteet- j
I LxECLTED a:. -1 day or
-.I 3
y* 0644 1,
Cf/Eddas f 3 ,
pyt.: er sera
i
i
i, ."T, = _f
F ~ £ 1~~t i s
r7
a
t -w -MCode 3-11-12 w. A. 6042 Ext.!'92
THE STATE OF TA%AS ;
Denton
coWy of.._._........
V kNl1w AI.L wLN RY TAIJk TA4:kNTLr I Zou 1 i
J. P . Sits y '
Alf0?-Martha-Ann Sitt._,._
Renton _
,.d1w /kira.(N M Mr N MM MnM Gu.y. ie.r, it w1 M M»NrAb. f U, r1..,L/n Ikl w1V ulru• V . Ial If W mn Ir»11.. M W .Inl 4 lrY ,»Ilrh 1
1 r n W ,J... 4 .y N IM+ R.nr N /.lint wll qR V N4 Tnw Nw / IJ.1, n
CnRinnr a r.nw.nl 1 rNW.rf.
••Y Ir ,k.lr4 Ir.+.»I..b..MM MIrIY.lkw IVn .n,4VnR W ..r LN. R.Mr. a .4r. .M ,1 urrwn w ,r.44 4R.r4.,nen IluLtlnf .A+ M,I, M *-4. Ad
r rF.r
r r.WL1., b4RY... ,d bW r.rk .Irr..nn ,n/ ,.1 1, .1 w .w, lM "1" s./ .I..R A. I+rA 1 . ww N .[N Aoq AI Ir l4 wN C-r.n...r.., ••,w, ,r .r.w 11,
r
I
Being a de6cription of the Texas Power and Light Company's Distribution line as now located i d
pole staked across the lend of J. P. Sits located in the A. B. Long Bottom and M•E.P, d P,A, ! 4
Co. Surveys Abstract #775 and 927, Denton Countys Texas.
J\
j I Beinning at o point in a east property line of the land of J. P, Sits; said point being loci ed
I { 209 feet, more or less, south of a north east corner of the land of J, P. Sits,
Thence in a north westerly direction for 6 distaned of 225 feet, more or 1663, to a point in
` property line dividing the land of J. P. Sits and a County road. Said point being located 120
f! ; ! feet, more or leas, west of a north east corner of the land of J. P. Sits.
Beginnin6 again at a point in a south property line dividing the land of J. P. Sits and a Cow ty
Boadj sad point being located 15) feet, more or less, west of a southeast corner of the land of,
i Js P. Site
Thence in a horthwesterly direction for a distance of 2 foots more or less, to a Texas Power nd '
Light Co. dead end pole and its attached down guys
1 NN 0," 111.4.._..«.. 2...... • .._.Nvk. NL 1c_ R+n d+1 W Anta d.4 r. Iwrrr A wN bw,
1 r , TMMMr .bl W r4k nl M, h» .n/ rr», bw~ir/ t..rl NJ.wnl N+A
N o r Irw, w4 P.+.!. 1. IN M Iw w ,th* N.InlINw .+rArwVnr N ,..A M th.R NpM1.t Nlr 6m ..r ~ V
.Irw ,i w.1.1." 4n/ / r.r. ,RnN,rrr W ,NM nJr,b 1M N .1 r .IInN k O 1W 4 N., Id 14
I,W rN I. 4..1 M 1».,m 4 1 Y./ NA. IMm 4 .
..NN V rn«•r f, or . I W A.IIwV nn wIM nJ.. w. M W NWlow ,n o .M M, .IIW.ra wN ku. w rM..
I Ttl II/Ta //1i1 itl IIIAtl Me .w. fwerll.N +.ee
.
sY4
fir. J~ I •
4: V
r
*amel
401
(fF
I
ABSOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Denton finds it necessary to dispose of a
certain tract of lend located in the City of Denton, Texas, and
I more fully described below; and
1fliEREAS, the below described parcel of land was let for bid on
j September 16, 1960, and the hi hest bid of Six Thousand Nine
Hundred Seventy-five and No1100 (16,975.00) Dollars was awarded to
ten Goodwin; ser Goodwin, agreehethat yao consideration pof $6 475 00$S s is fill and
agreed value of such described property; j
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DF.NRN, TEXAS, 'THAT:
to The City Attorney is hereby authorited to prepare whattei
legsl documents are necessary to complete the transfer of property ~P.
to described below;
m
o
State y nofg and Texas, , balan~
All that certain lot, tract or parcel
Denton, land
f
situated in the City and County
` being ppart of the R. Beaumont Survey, Abstract No. 3L, and being +
nart of Lot No. 9, Block 3 of the Fry Addition, in`additlon to the
City and County of Denton, and also being ppart of a tract of land
as conveyed (tom Hervey Howard and wife, Tlnnis L. Howard, to the
City of Denton by deed 'dated June 2, 1964, and recorded In Volume
` 5o 4, Ps a 17B of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more
partitu arty de+eribed as followst
i • BEGINNING at the southeast torncf' of said treat, said point lying
In the west right=of-way line of Denison Street;
" THENCE west along the south boundsry line of said tract a distance
of 150 feet to the southwest corner of said tract;
THENCE north along the west boundary line of laid tract a,di tance
of 45 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying approximately
B feet south of the south curb line of the present Sherman Drive;
TTHENC9 Youth 790 2S' ss" east a distance of 152.59 feet to a
t eSn; the`ve t rlehtiof-wavy line of Denison Street, asaidtpoint a]io
lying approximately 8.7 feet South of the South curb lint of the
Present SSheroisn Drttre;
k.
THENCE south along said line a distance of 17 feet to the plate of
beginning and containing 46SO square feet of land, more or less,
1, This Resolution shall take effect Immediately from and
after Its passage and approval in accordance with the provisions of
the Denton City Charter.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1980.
C I TYOF DENTON, TRAS
f
ATTEST:
i
.I, CITY OF OENT~AZS'SCETX3(V E
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR JR,, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DE.NTN, TEX S
BYt
t
i
a
i R E S O L U T I O N
ANEREAS, the City of Denton finds it necessary to dispose
of ■ certain tract of land located in the city of Denton,
Texas, and more fully described below; and
" WHEREAS, the below described parcel of land was let for bid
on September 16, 1910, and the highest bid of one Thousand and
No/100(1,000.00) Dollars was awarded to Denton Concrete CO.!
WHEREAS* the City of Denton and purchaser of said parcel,
Denton Concrete Co., agree that a consideration of $1,000.00 is
a fair and agreed value of such described property;
y NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
.
1. The City Attorney Is hereby authorized to prepare r:
! whatever legal documents are necessary to complete the transfer
of property to described below;
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and bein` f
situated In the City and County of Denton State of Texas, and
f'.
being part of the Hiram S£sco Survey, Abstract No. 6161 and
Jr'
being a tract of land as conveyed from Aver Mae Garrett to the
City of Denton by deed dated September 21 1979, and recorded i
in Volume 975, Page 942 of the Deed Records of Denton County, f
Texas, and more particularly dascribed as follows:
BEGINNING At the Intersection of the North line of Exit Prairie
Street with the Nest line of the Missourl•Xansas- Texas Railway
Company right-of-way;
THENCE Nest with the North line of Prairic Street 4S feet, j
corner in said line;
THENCE North 10 feet more or less, corner in South line of i
Texas 4 Pacific Railway company land;
THENCE East with South line of said TAPRA Co. lend 45 feet,
corner in West line of Missouri•Xanses-Texas Railway Company
right-of-way;
j TFIENCE South with said line SO feet, tore or 1409, to the place
of begintling, and embracing the lost 4S feet of a certain lot
of land conveyed by John Alexander and wife to W. C. Ximbreugh
byy deed dated the filth day of October, 1922, recorded in Boat
111, Page $16 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas.
S. This Resolution sball take effect immediately from aad
after Its Pasta a and approval in accordance with the
provisions of the lenton City Charter.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1090. {3
r
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
ATTEST:
S
Bli6d)'S F ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM I
C. J. TAYLOR, JR. CITY ATTORNEY
C1TY/O1F DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
{
wr b~xs»Hi•rs4Y'1` WV aV.YM•i,a.a r..+ , rw r.. ....t.v...
i December 2, 1980
I~
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
1
SUBJECT,
' Approval of Two (2) Railroad Crossing License Permits with i'
I the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company for 20" Cast Iron
Sanitary Sewer Line Crossings on Prairie Street.
1
-s SUMMARYa I
The Pecan Creek Ir.terceptor Sewer Line project calls'for,the
crossing of two (2) railroad 'tr5cks by, the Morrison Milling
Company on Prairie Street. This will necessitate the
execution of two (2) railroad crossing licenses, copies of
which are attached hereto.
FISCAL 'SUMMARYs
Railroad Crossing License Fees $10500
(two (2) at $750 each)
Source of ruidsi Sewer Bonds $10500
ACTION REQUIRED
Approval by the City Council of the permits and authorization
for the Mayor, through a Resolution, to execute the licenses.
RDCOt 1MENDAT I ON f
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of November 25, ;
1980, recommended to the City Council that subject licenses, ,
-i along with the license fees, be approved. d
j Respectfully,
C
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I License Agreement
II Resolution
I ,
i
,
s
,q
w.•m MY rtlFSSr{~'N*L'ui^R?fa'/. TAM R4'AnY M +W _
1
R E S O L U T I O N
i
j BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DEuTON, TEXASs
`.,.A The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to
execute on behalf of the City of Denton, Texas, a Pipe A.
Line License agreement dated November 21, 1980,
between the City of Denton and the Missouri Pacific
Railroad Company.
X
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of December,
1980.
1
~ JI
RI H . STEP , A R
ATTESTS
5
1 BROOKS HOLTr..CITY 9 ETARY 'l
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS
C,J. TAYLOR, JR.r CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
#r
ru r' }
qe i
i
k ~
`inn k. .y+.
~.'1 - p rv ,
4'
•-T-.
limp-
.
t4R}.l(tF.4h.".(4~~."f''~'''~''P9~'-='1J+4$r•1 zk.#*w•.:.ne ••..qw ~w;a , n:,..... er,p..•.::y r•,.x....,..
R E S O L U T I O N
i
I S
I
BE IT RESOLVED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or ~
F hENTON, TEXASs
The MayaL is hereby authorized and directed tb j
i
9xecute on bahalf of the City of Denton, Texats, a Pipe
Line License agreement dated May 14, 1980, between the
City of Denton and the Missouri Pactfic Railroad
p
I Conpany.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of D4cEmbero
1980.. ;
RICHARD 0. STf3iiART, MAYOR
f i $ , :fir
h { ATTESTe d
B KS H LT, CITY 80CRETARY
CI'T'Y OF DENTON, TEXAS
y ~ I 1
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
C.J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY '
CITY OF DENTON, TEXA13
r
l1
i•3 i
„
' I I
,
r
9
Val
j 4
I '
I .rs-,n•.
Jsu 116-2383.1
~rm20021 1074
f PIPE LINE LICENSE'
itt
THIS INSTRUMENT, executed in duplicate, may 14 , 19 80, WITNESSETHs
.
The undersigned Carrier hereby grant9, but on solely the herein expressed terms and
conditions, ani the undersigned Licensee ( a municipal Corporation ,
(individual, copartnora or corp. & state where incorporated;
to be addressed at Municipal Building, Dentou) Texas 76201 ,
hereby accepts, permission to install, keep, maintain, repair, renew and use for coiveying
sewage the Lieensoe'a own one . certain proposed
(number) (proposed or wilting)
continuous line of cast iron pipe ;!0 incbes in diameter, and appurtenances,
herein called Pipe Line, on
the Carrier's property, herein called Premises. Pipe Line will be used to convey
sewagd
Pipa' Line shall intersect Carrier's existing
track ,mar at Milo Post 209.37, 16417960Qf M ,
(track or right o: way) Engineer's Chainage Station 11*474.,
EXX7bgOCKS~XiSK1pCKXX 4(XXX , Denton County , Texan , at xxxxxx= Denton
(county or parish) (state) (place)
1,pproximate location of Pipe Line Is indicated by heavy black line on
Exhibit A attached hereto as part hereof.
I
1. Lioinsee shall as all times keep Pipe Line in good state of repair. All work by
Licensee hereurder shall be performed in a safe aril workmanlike manner. Licensee shell
furnish or do at Licansee's own cost and responsibility any and all things and when and i
as from time to time required to accomplish whatsoever the Licensee attempts or is bound
1
to do at any time hereunder. Licensee shall Mjuet Pipe Line to any physical change at
made at any time in any of Carrier's property$ at all times keeping upper surface of Pipe
Lino at least, five and one-half feet below boV,6m of rail thereover. j
Licensee shall cause Pipe Line, before being used for anything inflammable, to conform
substantially to Exhibit B attached hereto as part hereof. Sa+d things, inoluding t'ho
time and manner of doing any work, each shall conform to the requirements of ('darr:3r as
well as of any State, Federal or Municipal authority. Carrier may acting for Lioens60
furnish or do, and Licensee shall pay and bear the cost of, anything which, herein required
of Licensee at any time, either shall not be furnished or done Whin ten days, following
Carrier's written request therefor or shall be undertaken by Car:•ier at Licensee's request]
ani Licensee on request shall in advance deposit with Carrier the estimated cost thereof.
If deposit be lose than actual cost, Licensee shall pay the difference) if mere, Carrie:
shall repay difference.
Licensee when returning this license (signed) shall pay to Carrler $*m gUndrea Tifty
dollars for the license grantod herein. Any other payment shall be made within twenty
days following receipt of bill. Licensee shall pay cost to Carrier for all labor, inolud-
ing wagai of foremen, cost of material f.o.b. Carrier's rails plus freight at tariff rates
to point of use, plus taxes and usual rtilroad additives. No provisions of this paragraph,
or approval b Carrier of any of Licensee's undertakings, shall relieve Licensee of any
n Y responsibility or liability.
E
2. Licensee agrees to (a) indemnify ani save harmless the Carrier from and against 3
all claims, suits, damages, costa (including attcrneys' fees), losses and expenses, in any
manner roeulting from or arising, out of or in cotmection with the laying, maintenantis.
renewal., repair, Use, existence or removal of Pipe Line, including the breaking of
Low or any leakage therefrom, and (b) assume all risk of loss or dar{aae to Pipe Line and
s
the contents thereof regardless of how caused arri regardless of any negligence on the
part of Carrier, or otherwise.
Y I - 1
'r t '
t ~
Form 20021 10/74
3. Term 'hereof shall begin with
may 1$ , 180 , aid continue there-
after until concluded (let) by expiration of thirty days following serving,
by Licensee on Carrier, or vice versa, of written notice of intention to end term hereof
or (2nd), at Carrier's election without further notice, by expiration of - six
months without the Fipe Line having boon installed or by Licensee failing (a-1) to pure
any default or (a-2) to show statutory right to install Pipo Line within .----.-.-thirty
days following Carrier's written request therefor. Any notice of Carrier ,ball be deemed
served when posted conspicuously on Pipe Line or when deposited postage prepaid in Us S.
mail addressed as aforesaid. Not later than last day of term hereof Licepaee'ehall
remove Pipe Line and restore Promises. Any of Pipe Line not so removed shall at Caiiierla
election without notice be deemed abandoned. Covenants herein shall inure to or. biM each
` patty's heirs, legal representatives, Successors and assignel providedf no right of
Licensee shall be transferred or assigned, either voluntarily or involuntarily, except
by express agreement acceptable to Carrier. Carrier or Licensee may waive any default at -j
any time of the other without affecting, or impairing any right arising from, any Sub-
Sequent default. J
,
SRTNFMS: ~
:
.6,
By
General Caarrier,~ first party h-rein
i
ATTF.4 P I
8y
!
Seoretary MY OF DLNTON, WAS
(Affix Seal) 3
I
j NiTNMSES i
S Licensees eaoond party herei; j o
I
2 i
5
1
WIWI
.
y ` { • 1
%.3 CUP
'y
tv b yn N •d , ~ ` Y/ H
m It
411
1,004 .15 14) 1.
( MILL
L-Al
- ,I Ly 02,
~ X51.. rra..rt• fey ~ rl~ :~at~ •~~l'-.•~;~-`• ~ • ~ ~ • r
•.1 '.~-..--rte .
%
l.4.lQt l1. 15,'•fl• r. n, HrL: P1C.' •~'~~}.1 O yy 'Y 1. Na.Y• ZVT
S!!' enphone i~ne-S. A' Tel. t Ta1e• [ .
vi 4,1
$ 0: ACS 11b3 i`I+~. as"v eo
• ' uy 2b" Cas it•r 1 a. 'X Q 1
16
• a O t'rv'••'al ~r1} R^1 ~O +
i bsdl N •a 1 ti~ ray` 0. y
o .•r
J ✓ ,
ox MOT A
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COQ"PAt"i'1~
yTWS DIS T WOT
hen atvt:a c:vtstou
i ~ 11 \I 11 ~1 t pcoQostd ~ip~~iNaCeoSt~N
11 ` l' 11 1 Ci~ o~ Dew
~ ~ l~ ~ ,1 a \ ro C'(1►Se, Posh 1.n~.3'1 '
y 0 Of= OF Dfr,YAICT tY.cr.'Iltn ltou.~ra,~, rr ;a.t
' • yl 1 V 11'1 I, 1~* `q 12 •`I , J~ • • , , SCA~F.~~i... `
V v.y' 6 1 1• ",e f,. _ DRAfT£IAAN~S OAYt,~ It£.«.»II
t
1
Form 20021 10/74
PIPE LINE LICKNSE
THIS INSTRUMENT, executed in duplicate, ;)oveewc r- 11 19L(; WITNESSLTH:
The undersigned Carrier hereby grants, but on solely the herein expressed terms and
conditions, and the undersigned Licensee ( o t,(jnlclp.+l cerliorption . +
(individual, copartners or corp. & state where incorporated;
to be exdressed attklniclpel Builvl%g Ornto.l, 'fuses 71ino
hereby accepts, permission to install, keep, maintain, rep%lr, renew at)i use for conveying'
snnitory s:n rjc the Licensee's own ol~E' cdrtain prop;,ed
(number) (proposed or existing)
continuous line of test iron pipe , 20 inches in diameter, and appurtenances,
Aif6,1ra4ing...... , heroin called Pips L4no, on
the Carrier's property, herein called Promises. Pipe Line will be used to trenoport
~,a s~nitnry su~~cg~ :
,
Pipe' Line shall intersect. Carrier's exi sting
tr,+ck ,ndz nt Trock i;o. 51 'tS 1.446.6
RX';,StFC1r~Gn,%(--•»».-_• ,
(track or right of wsy)
(ILIItUiI 4CUnty , T%,: V.i , at brS,t!°:G;C; UCllton
(county or parish) (state) (place)
Approximate location of Pipe Line is indicated by harvy bus's line on
1J01111 A attached hereto as part hereof.
1. Licensee shall at all tiaea keep Pipe Line in good state of re;siir, All work by
Licensee hereunder shall be performed in a safe and workmanlike manner. Licensee shall
furnish or,do at Licensee's own cost and responsibility any and all things and when and
as from time to time required to accomplish whatsoever the 1,1661996 attempts or is bound
to do at any time hereunder. Licensee shall adjust Pipe Line to any physical cbange as
1 made at. any time in any of Carrier's property] at all times keeping upper surface of pipe
Line at least five a,:ri one-half feet below bottom of rail thereover~ j
Licensee shill cause Pipe Line, before being used for anything inflammable, to conropm
? substantially to Exhibit E attached hereto as part heroof, Sail things- , incl6dii4 the
time and manner of doing any work, each shall conform to the raquiremonts of Cartier as
well as of any State, Federal or Municipal authority. Carrier may acting for Litime8,
furnish or 30, and Licensee shall pay and bear the cost of, anything which, herein required
of Licensee at any tims, either shall not be furnished or done within ton days following
Carrier's written request therefor or shall be undertaken by Carrier at Licensee's requests
ani Licensee on request shall in advance deposit with Carrier the estimated cost thereof.
If deposit be less than actual cost, Licensee shall pay the differeneej it more, Carrier
shall repay difference.
Licensee when returning this license (signed) shall pay to Carrier i7Ar 00
dollars for the license granted heroin, Any other payment shall be We within twenty
days following receipt of bill. Licensee shall pay cost to Carrier for all labor, includ-
ing wages of foremen, cost of material f.o.b. Carrier's rails plus freight at tariff rates
to point of use, plus taxes and usual railroad additives. No provisions of this paragraph,
nor approval by Carrier of any of Licensee's undertakings, shall relieve Licensee of any
responsibility or liability.
r
2. Licensee agrees to (a) indemnify and save harmleas the Carrier fiom and against f
all claims, suits, damagea, costs (including attorneys' foes), losses and expenses, in any
!
wanner resulting from or arising out of or in connection with the laying, maintenance.
renbwal, rbpdir, use, existence or removal of Pipe Lina, inoludi:ag the breaking of
same or any leakage therefrom, and (b) assume all risk of loge or damage to Pi Line and
the contents thereof re &rdleas of how caused and re ardl s' of
8 8 e any 6eg1!gence on the
i
i
part of Carrier, or otherwise. ~ i
l
t
a
i
Form 20021 1074
I
9. Term hereof shall begin with IK,v .in e r 21 , 19•'` , and continue there-
after until concluded (let) by expiration of............ thirty days following serving,
by Licensee on Carrier, or vice versa, of written notice of intention to and term hereof
or (2nd), at Carrier's election without further notice, by expiration of----~~
months without the Pipe Line having been installed or by Licensee failing (a-1) to cure,
any default or (a-2) to show statutory right to install Pipe Line within thirty !
days following Carrier's written request therefor. Any notice of Carrier shall be, deemed
served when posted conspicuously on Pipe Lino or when deposited pi)s_sgs prepaid in U. S. ;
mail addressed as aforesaid. Not later than last day of term hereof Licensee shall
remove Pipe Line and restore Premises. kq of Pipe Line not so removed shall at Carrier's
election without notice be deemed abandoned. Covenants herein shall inure to or. bind each
party's heirs, legal representativeu, successors and assignsj provideds no right of f
Licensee shall be transferred or assigned, either voluntarily or involuntarily, except
by express agreement acceptable to Carrier, Carrier or Licensee may waive &iy default at
arm time of the other withsat affooting, or impairing any right arising from, any sub-
sequent. default.
k
L
!E I,I:;GURI CA~IFIG ~:^kL,.t4r.G Guia"Ai,"! `
WITNESSESs
By -
Gr,u^.r 1 11t.ie;;ar
As Carrier, first party herein I
}
ATT£STt i
secretary O'N U1 ::'i~ 1 44
(affix seal)
WITNFSSESs
I0yar
As Licensee, second party herein
~ r
I
4
2 r
i i
j
,fr"ab aF'.
R
AIM{Y~
I
I!
Lij .4
1 { t a
e°' ~ 3 i i ~a f.~ l L. to f .s, r..•.
r•~'.a a'•w!i p~i rGa ,,..,,,.r..~.------------•
10
r ! ; 13
EXHIBIT
r .
rP~i 1,i~_ 1~: ~~-.1~ ~ilJii llt r'. ] •
I { Cr F . f{~ FA-i t~W
02
Il } 1 p o Plot
L; 13~ C aess, i,~
i 1 I Ro7oSl
111111
13 12 9' { 8 ` S 40.._, C 2 Y'4 x b Eti t o,+
, I II
j ~ I ~ 4 1• ~4LAtti NO.S ~ ,
1 y ! ` 0? DWri44T L',Si,fitll-NJJaTO I, tfXa~
Ofrl CAL
j. '
ATE1~ f1LE f.^
1A"FT5Pr- A 41)
• • p:
_ I
air _ o-.v a,.
j
y
i CirY OF DENTON
AGENDA ITEM
DECEMBER 2, 1980
I Discussion on the Street Bond Program.
r
d
t; S1444RY
As of June the Planning and Zoning Commission had developed their ;
recarmmendation for the Capital Improvement Program. On July 1, 98 the h
I
Commission recommended a bond issue as well as items for the Capital
Improvement Program. The Commission recommended that approximately nine (9)
million dollars worth of bonds be issued for improvement to the streets. They
also recommended that the rE-route of Bell Avenue be considered as a separate
bond item.
FISCAL Sl1MMARY:
A bond Issue as proposed by Planning and Zoning will be approximately
nine (9) million dollars. Bell Avenue will be approximately ##1,6 (million, and
intersection modifications would amount to approximately 51,2. million.
would estimate the engsneering cost would be aproximately 10% of whatever the
council chose to allocate, (See attached memo from Finance on funding
sources),
ALTERr,NAT_ IVES: i
I
1, Accept Planning and Zoning recommendations and call for bond issue
2, Reject the bond issue. i
3. Modify Planning and Zoning recommendations.
i
1
i ~
C
E
I ~ r
Y[
FFF
C 1
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF OENTON
V
To: Chris Hartung
1
From: Rick Svehla
Date: November 22, 1980
Subject: Bond Issue ;
r
g yy
Staff has reviewed its on anal estimates for the recommendations made b
Planning and Zoning last June in relation to the bond issue. In that
recommendation, Planning and Zoning recommended that priorities 112, and 3 be
4. funded. In todays dollars we estimate that cost would be $1,981,500.00.
We feel that this total program could be done by the City of Denton with its
own staff within a 5 year period, A smaller amount of work, approximately
$3,583,190.00, could be done in 2 years. The Finance Department will be
sending you a memo on the different effects this will have on the tax rate if
the Council should pass either one of these alternatives,
We have also reviewed our estimates on the cost of realigning Bell Avenue from
F the existing Bell Avenue and Bell Place intersection to the intersection of
Bell Ave. and University as per TWU's oriilmal request. We have estimated the
cost of that construction to be approxirnaelyy'S100 00 00 we have alto looked
t at extending Bell along a new alignment to Sherman sDrive ~near the intersection
a of Sherm and Greenwood, This additional w -nsion would cost approximately
5160,000. plus the acquisition of 10 to 12 tracts of land. The value of
r these tracts Auld have a very wide range and we would estimate the minimum
cost to be 5500,000.00. We have included a map showing two alternate
alignments.
We have also been able to find a 1969 report on some sort of overpass or
{ underpass at McKinney Street and the Railroad tracks. The three alternatives j ,
were for cn overpass, an underpass or a use of an existing drainage channel. f
using the cost estimated in this study and pprojecting them at 8 per cant
inflation until 1916 and then at 15 per cent 1lflation after that the cost of
the overpass would be $2.25 million, cost of the underpass would be $3.3
milli Qn and cost of the use of the existing channel would be approximately
$200,00.00. We have included excerpts from this plan for your information.
i
lT''
Y
Wool
I
I
i
Page 2
Bond issue
November 22, MCI
ional $1.2 million for
i
finally the Council mtgalio want C~ty, Currently W,2 have
improvements to existing -dips a roximately 0 bIn terse to t~constructe newty avement,ncurbs l andE guttersn aqd/or
pp
hi money would have attached a
s
e. ;
underggSSroulistinggi of theostreeti econstructlOncand/or coverlays"along with aa vMap
pcost hest estinataswould
ihowtnAytheir lotations along i on other
over severt
All of our estimations are based spread
have to be inflated e s tak e flati if they were isointo account when theyare d4scurther
years. ile will ask Finonc to answer any further. `
ax rate. We would be hap
feels that each one of
aff
thesd effects on the t
questions you or the Council might have. Our st
eri these projeh:ts his mouncil fund as many of the f thesetasopossible ~niky and we would k p
recommend that the C
\
c ve a
s,
21
r
' k
I tk
i
.r W
t
i
v
C1TYof DENM, TEXAS MUNICIPAL SUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 7620; / TELEPHONE (all) 566-SNO
r,
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
f: FROM: W. H. McNary, Director of Finance t;
PATE: November 25, 1980
%
SUBJECT: FIVMCING OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Er-
Outlined below are the tax increases necessary to finance various protects s
being considered for a bond issue. The debt service required to finance the
Issuance of bonds was calculated assuming 9% interest over 20 years.
Tax aa4
Debt Increase SM
Project Cost Service Required
} 5 year Street Program S 7,9879500 1,1189250 35.6¢
2 Year Street program 3,5839190 501,641 16.0d
Bell Avenue
TMU Design 700,000 98,000 3.14
Extension to Sherman 660,000 92,400 2691
McKinney Street
Overpass 2,250,000 315,000 10.04
Underpass 3,300,000 462,000 14.74
Existing Channel 2000000 28,000 0.94
Intersection Improvements 162006000 168,000 5.34
r ,
* -ll
F'. w. H. Mckary
r Director of finance
pl
j
'ya . f j
I
r•
1
.t
oil
City Council
.Tiny 1, 19iW
i
Regular Meeting of the City Cased! of the City of Deutoa •t 1:00 pea„ 14aday,.
I July 1, 1980 to the Douaatl Cbabor of the Nuatelpal buildine. VOIA, 4 WlFiliTr Mayor Stewart, City Manager Chris i lartuag, City Attorney 0. ,
Taylor end
,
u pkLnei
I City gmeretary stoats Holt.
{ AgMTi Couooii Meabar Heasley
vu same by TaLUt tso, naoadad by Stephen tha's %b4 a.nutaa
for the spatial Canso. Meeting ;c Juts 10, 1980, the Ragutar Naetiae of :u"'ITr
" 1980 sad the Aglaia! Called Rtetvt of June 24, 1980~be appeoved rLth a aorroatton
to the :sae 24, 1980 viluutes to renaa1 that Nam Btewrt rwppeiatod Miller
Devt4ge sad Randy Malls to the DeLtou SWaing Authority. Rattail garried.
~ a: yaaclc HgAhmrog~
M (A) Rayne Stewart opened the hearing as L-1470, tine' petittaa of Mr,
. C. 0. Rtebbime, requesting a obaeg, of toting from Lgrioulttral (A) to stasis
(sally (IT-19) oil a treat approetsatsly 1/2 sera is $tu 1 mated along the south
(g side of nghrar 310 Wgiastop appresimataly 460 feet rest of the taterteatian .
if ,Q of Highway 00 Lad arissaa/Trinity Read.
j Q '!tin apoha.id twee "A 3 is oppostttas. The cpposition mottles" a
i oil.-wall later suyply for lateral hoses and to leverage.
Tea bluing was elosed.
:et! Rat", Aatiag pLastag and Con"ity Dovelapaeat Diraoter,
stated that the gestalt water Stag is appreaiaattly 7,000' free the site, Us
searm sever Use is a tole 60!00, away, AAA "%"@Los of a 6~ lies
would Maire the Last tioa of a Sift steins. H4 added that the r"admig }
uwt Leming Camaiaatas felt that thA prop" tealag elassifidattaa is eespdible E
with sgurasadiag w om sad reas,aoodad Lppreral by a rote bt 7 to d with 1
sbdeatioa.
Not" was made hsg %Uis erro,• osowd4d 17 YOU that time polities
to approved; Mottea 6" barowe a 0 mosjmrity to required.
r I '(g) VAM4Steve" opaaed the learlrsg d 2-11711 the (rikitteg of W.
Joe Soho, rs*mtLag maoxatioa of a Ca we treat SwaW apprestaataly 10!60
fact td of Intardda 37V, bogiaaigg ap mKiaately 1,010 fed south of Lifter,
Inter ass.
NO ee4 epoho regarals the petittaa, me the beariag wool el"ed,
:off N.y r, MUM rl.nstag wed Cowmity D .elopr►st Director,
da114d that as May To 1960 the h0lmdq and LesIag CartmeLea sv4seved the petitlar
gf Mr. J44 R41er u follows
(1) A abaft* of 2aaisy; free aviouLtural (A) to light isduatrtal
(5I) alaastfiodlgn as a 1.1 sago pared legated slang the
west it" of 2.37V.
(2) AM"tiea art 34111 todustrial (nt) meateg as a 6.2 saes
treat lgmetod +ppre:la+tely 370 feet Vogt of I-33V oeotlguoas
and red of No. 1 shell. 0
The 6.1 sere treat it this request to oogtigum std wad of Ha. S
1 allow. The Plead" std tat" "Utieg recoaseoda approval of 1-1671.
1 MMtea was ud4 by W.WAs, uwoded by Stopboa* that the Witloo.
f
fee approved, Vatias eLrrted aaaataouely,
(C) Mayor Stewart opened the beams,! gn 9•1111" , the petitiea of kill
Casa Hash, requuting as uesdaest to a pum-t it"elopsieet (10) far detached
etagta Emily bowleg at 47 it 100 fed 1oti, to pewit multi flatly radricted
(MY-R) development oil a traot eppreti.ately T Leros 1a 4124: flit property to
leested north of Viadoor Ortr4 and bogies tppressts►t4ly 127 feet wed of Stuart
had.
An,: hMrir•p 1 tp k in f#k,mr ttd : to au<.alt;i, o tts,R:.vir,; vt,
e ~ ,
ti
awl
i
i
I
c ~
' ~ 2`~ July 1, 1y60 Continued
Jeff Meyer, Acti-V Planning aryl Caac.'mity tavulo;ment Director,
P-ated that till unicrlyitc Philosoth/ of th.s 01,41,311 4"Volopr mt. wee to 1 xet0
the basher density urea ca the interior vitb access to the Vindaor extension
and with sad 14t ltae development. no running Caemiasioa felt that the
proposol amendatat undormiaee this philosophy wy significantly expanding the
high density dtvelapeeat,
! &-ties vas math by Yale, eeeonded by ltevart that the pelttton to
dented. Hatton j!}1 with 3 voting agaiaet.
i
Motion we than sods by T'altaferro, ueoaded by topkini that the
potitioa be approved. Hat! 3a tailed 3 to 3. ,
j (D) Mayer Steuart opened the beariag an i•14% the petition of Mfr.
Union 11. Vilsoa, requeetiog a charge of gaming frcn matt feeily (Met-t) to
soigbbo-boat service (Mfg) classification at 3 lots fixated betvaem CoUlar
Street gad Avenue 3, bagimiog immedlatoly north 0 oadervood 6erat and totaling
apprrxisateiy 1.1 acres. The property is awn partieulerly described u city
late 1T, 17.1, 16, 19, and 19.1, Block ST6A
After boariag 1 speak is favor but can in Opposition, the btsring
tag closed.
i :off mows Acting Plaaata-1 and Camuaity Dovelopesnt Diresta`,
stated that 16 letters vore naiad vise 3 recta aed to favor and come to epo"Ltlft,
am that the Planaieg and Waiag ewwastoe reee~eeds aeigblti:twee serrtao (0) .
sold- only for lots 11,i, 16, 19 and 19.1 at Black 3! ' The original rodwet
Las' ,d lot 11 which vas deleted,
Notice van me" by etephens, sooonded by V ,L& that the petition be
e. raaatrwd:t by the Plsnaiag and Zoning Cowdesios. gotten carried
v
3. Tbs Council considered an appearance by too Briehlay'reprsaeati'ag the
Ds mast Denton tntdaatial tartruettual Canter Advieery CowwU o"arniag
their request that the city peevtdt for the operstiem of the Southeast Denton
tostruttieeal Cantor.
Mtr..triwdoy stated that the b+vtsory cauml:,of the 6wthaael Data
tnatratioul. Canto is rataeetiag that the city pootbass t1e pertablt hni+ U"
"now at trod Wien park *Loh bauee the 1astLeaat Dontam teaideel14
Latrsottaeal Canter. So also requentd tit the City;aevow raepersihltty a4
fisaeeLN the O"rat!<a of the Center -JAW the Park$ and toaremKea Deptrtraet.
haiekley adr~sed that the Two Umatted Ageaey funded a pregrea tbat ri13• Oat
a June 30, 1960
• ta"r btwsn edvistd that the Caunoil eeald any rotor the mt9er to
tha 040P.8 and Recreation Board,
Notten vas srda by 6taphew, seconded by Yale to rotor the tangs to
the Parks and Recreation Bard for their rseaerendattot, Mabee carried asraiaeumly.
1. The caumu 0"614" approval of the Capital lagrol act plan.
(A) Planaisi t t,:: tag Ceeaataioa tecommoddatiess
LLaete ROAdw, Cbairparwd of %be Plseais~ a Soaing Caaetifetoo,
protested the n+dsaa"Atcas far projeats under the uPital Ltprevesonts Plea.
f as reeasnendod that tka Pptlid Yorks "I na"Asg Departments turtish the
PLratse and Pacing Camnifties With an infentery at etreMd in need gt reeeast-
ii ruatien and repaving. 1w streets vase dfrtded We tour dategoetso see toilette
I Priority 1-Amoormtien at ervsay needed
Prtcrtty Zdeaadnructten or overlay "ad
Priority 34e4604tructiea Or overlay ceded
Tabls ii! •Ovariay needed (lhaked only by Matteis potato)
i
The Plamain; and teniat Coeaissloa rsadnatnls t1 a tollaviag projects for taaluidd
is the fifth year of the Capital toproveneat plant
Sattbridgt.toaasidge Art" area dralm"
aloovood-Nistyveed drataage
Cott Street at Leer/ gad CArdell drsaye
IfeooTM.tnKtiea of sidwallJ
i
•Y
1 July 1, 1990 CormauOd
The Plauriesi ead Losing Comaierloa reeo,u vie that the City tonneij. tell f&r a
. bond eleet'.on for the parpoee Of provialtu revenue t'or recuet,vttaon or J,tiarlay
Of all striate included to priority to 1 and 1. The !loaning Cacmis,ioa turther.
rsooemeade that the realilnmeat of Sell Avenue to a separ.te Ltia La she bond
{ election.
Council Ambera comm"Aw Nee KAdan and the other webers of the
PL""M and Soslag Commission for their efforts.
Dr. Marilyn [relys HueY. president of TW, advised the Council that
the bard Of Regents Of TW had agreed to dowto adequate tang for the re-routing
of Sell Avenue on the east ride of the DaiYeroity campus. no asked than this
project he Looluded In a toad Lssw.,mottos van made by Stephens, logo" by Vela to accept the roeomsen• ~
dative o! the P1amlag and Units Caudestm and move forward with cost Nt:R.t,4
of stre,tti tatludirg the Sell Avenue p1:as, ead that the Council decide whether
J to preco v, the matter to the voters, lotion serried.
(1) P4114 VMilittco bard Srooimeodations .
r, q
t+Wd MiAties Director Sao 191"a stated that as Nay 11', I*, the NMI* ~
Dti:itlee bend ran presented .vsth the spaeted tntrlic thsilllN Pire Year Capital
trpsbweent plan and van briefed by the ve111tiee Departreat stiff as stn e6mt4. ~
The Pisa eewro the period of t9f0 Im. Tbl Dtsistul Soard held t
d Wbtte ►oudeegg en JJme u 1910, to »aeivo acerNtd from dstsui,
d pesrible ranting at priorluey aat/or awtiou w teisum to t►eniW10an
*$meet wan roooived tree the Airport bard rodasdiy the LanlalIMS" at a lf"
wear UN troy martial t"Lutiol at the n•+r paterbullt P1aat as Preaseiea Rut
to the Demos IAmiespal Airport, After eeteu iw toliboratlea, the Mtiistsie
kard cited to bind the project fervart to 1051 from the 1960 finial year end
ft" the QVIW 109 parties of the tine. Pith ao tW%hW eacaoetl rsaMi"j, tho
4tslitLN but voted to Ndopt the rive Year Capital uprovmeaa Koh vita the
1 alorssrstLos" thssto and recommended tat the plan W prNeeted to the Plannirs
cat SoaLng Carsirelen. on June "1 1000 the 1laeaiog Yd Usiims CammiNlea
revsewd the Piw Year Capital Ieprovee M rims,' Afar tot£g WOM ea the 1
i tariets slonoatr of the rim, the Cerciainm voted to uiept'tho plan. 1
I} Coveall Witcher iVMAA Stated that all seeearsed Nbeu2t Naha lure
! that the Land the Caemittso cad the VtLutios bard wrk topthe , ON tb Capital
hvrtvsm m via".
lbtlOS ass wed. by Vales, raeooded Se
by ly. to approve the iltati• !
rice Ieard'i neeueeada',iea, Nodes carried tJUalymo~mly.
E!
Caueeil t.mmUts praised the City employees for deist on sraall"t
deb, follovsal a tour of City 11"Autic",
The Manager thsntyd the CoumU for th„tr remarks adding that it
111 leans Much to th, mpl0rm for tba Council to visit thin. ;
The tolloving Ordiaanea vote pressatedr
I
(A) ORD=W.1 W. 86.19
AS WISAMCg CAYAM AD MUM AS SLWTSOM M SM 1110 to TStt CUT at DtMDDt1, ~
tv" of AI" to loft to TN RSIPC61 OF MISN1TTM " rid atALIPW ILL" $
ii MIND" SWAT d? $1/,4400 PSI Nwa rOR POLICO M l PRedOY to ft MUM
Pfrl s MM KWIMi1, An WKS Of VOftll0.
1 Mouse wa made ty 1"Waso e4006dei by Tausterro that the ordlaaara
W Passed, 0e roll dill late ft" # "eye", Vela. "ayes", Oasloy "sya", bphiN
aye , Teliaferrd "ayes" and gtwart "eye". mouses lamed. j
(Rf aRDmAMC,e Mo. eJ,.op
PPRONWTTa Im STfAriUM Mall MW VtO~TU "jUMON M'lDa% MCRtn An CS
J
r
■
'i { deiy 1, 1pe0 Coatlaw4 ,
• TKI IA3i SI71 OF AVL'IVS' D rrV1 TU IS=1!1%rtO.1 W &=3 T),Rr7A TO TAME
O7 WX STAIR{ AMD PAOA=110 PARWO oy DM SIDN of 1=0 WAS WMUT )7ldl
f TU IDTdI/WTION Of I11WITATl 317 ?ROt Wl ROAD TO ST II HMPM (TooI ) M.?
f } Cons OF SORIP1S I PROVIDINO A Ityn iIL:11 OLVACI flOVIDt96 A Ps«ALTY 7R¢ TO
' 0^"Z TWO MIIDW DOLLAR11 AND MIMM AN PRIM, 04".
Moslem w4 .ads w ita~Ao"I teoaded v Oatly that the Osdi:uede
N pus". On roll call ro!o loDklsa "aye" Yds. "y's" Oailoy "aye, stephee4
J+ "are01 Tahitian "an" &a at~ "eye". "otima aM4a.
{ (C), OR0IIA7C1 10. e0-11
i At WD:WAIO! IY TU OM'Y of Dn"11, 'P►'W, O1TJC1"I7I116 a M'IAILi> 1'IQ MAX.'
' IIMI "Ma FAC21 tPIPD Loa OI atuvow AID MItYmw TO St ton:-, ((70) )CIO
P'lt NMI PROM MO A PRIAM Of IOT TO VXM TWO I1i IDR70 DOLLMt -*w, of) a
t PROYIDIDO A WVAI1LMY OIAUNS1 An DICLAIIIO AS 17f10TIVl DATI.
Notf is vu made ty NoSklae, 6406014611 tY Tellehrre that tN Ofdiaeaae '
ti• posed. 6a .roli deli vote oat ey "aye", toop►du "A+ny► I MO*L o "af4°, Ye14'
'we", Tellatdrre "eyk" cad asavcA "ay4"., Motion oereiod. ,
(0 MDAIOI W, 40.10
• AN OIOaUAICI AMPf011D NVARA PIS (0)(4) Of tPMOS t -t3 W M COOS Or 1
ON MOO Of TU CT'M a' 7tIT0sl, TIXM FWAUUM TO 4M UL 'AO MI OOtf AV ,
1191 M AID 161PTIICAL RDW T V%TAOI DgTIPMINTi IMMIN fd >AIIP>A of RIe"199
TO Ilt'= AA NAti AU Wft UW-.ti RIfpM ALL ORIIiAt011 Yl 00RLSOT Mill..
VIM AW MCA= AI WWWTZV Un,
M,tioa w arde 1P fats, aa0oMe/ tY candy out tN Ortimass he-
10,0444, 04 tali 4411 wN ttkphoss "aye", Maas. "4ye", Iopttr "aye", 0ellay
Ve", l4114l4rro "eyk" 4M ItoNrt "e7o". wtsti "Met.
~ 6. ItIOttRKeMi k
i
TN Ceestil esutdersd appnfd of the lotlewtat Rat"ou" wsbrtsiag
the summ at u uerav dsrasat vlth the Its" pyartaoat of Ittlt+rye ad
buid *sospertwioa he tN eaetruatus, of a low C TMI
E VZMW, the city at bastes dntra the eesstreetios of a teeYnad ►t ropantlas
4al 1014"" 1 itaa an v.t. twerwwe 311; And I
• , lie hef lute eeat Te Ames a as ~ '!ts tewa XLOW 464 petite Trees.
p~o(aNl cad two vith the City of D*R%" a tats
1111MA, K40 Wto of Items rdquired that all Caestllpeneu It the city of Destak
audit is Norew Atrot~eat with the auto loo its parttdlpstiosl ,
IOW, Tow=$ 11 t! WKYm If To Ot:! Cd11'..ZI, of TII OITT Of Da'1'Or, Ttc1At, f
j ItIATt ,
j ~sors,. i
i n is tM istat of tN city C vmu at the Clty of buses to to
pWls1pat4
with the late Of Teau is 4e40rwtial a teeearoead at U.S. tatantaa 30,
ell hu dowllpersou ark haro►y ♦Mhaett/d to smells orlsl4LLt at the a"che"
i tod"o, Atruoeat rare!»d by eta /tatf of tau to aehlove vda perlsu.
Tte evM at ~►3e,300.00 is harkty appr'eprlat4d is pay the deft of this eeutrodtiea i,
11 ; proms.
} ~1 .~tiiA11 fY1iti.
j rut shim Ieeelatin shall tau shoot laredlatdy free "A s!t!r its potato
j ud Appraral.
P '
f 1
K 1.
n - ~r..•y ar..r~•.r•~.r~ . r....~ V_, r... assn... • . I
July 11 1960 coatimm
• PAFW KM APPROM this thl lot day of .AIIy, 1960.
ir rte, Y
a" or Dome mu
1 I{ A[V=$
DRUM Our, n~
, I 0117 Oy DOPI' I to is
am As SO L10AL Me -
J. 7tlYlAl. n. I cm AS4'OAlty
cm or DOPIGN. '1'ERAe '
are t./
]tatla vu ode 1r Wphent, ooeoedod by'Yola that tho Reoolatlee bee
a " rued. On roll e411 veto Bopktu "aya"~ bailor eye". Yale "aye", dteph"a E
aye". wider" "aye" am 6tavoM "aye . Nottee oerried.
Italian vii aids by ioatlaep soeoAded by Vela that Mau paynMt for
the prtlelpeta speaaat with ylaaulal coawltlad 1"'i ter owrsiu of •
vatalou at bturt load be mm"d ix the taow% of. 11.D'M a! raareeadol
the Ottllttos lend. Noting *&Mod. rr,
a at ut" no ode w caddy, seloded ty NePbiu that Keel payaaat 1*
$ Otlbert Adeoot►ta far the 1960 heor Sopir Mdy M Mrnd is IM east
tworeAeaed by the Ottlttta ]bard. Nett" tarried.
II the mtta of r 11 mit at im vu dlieueaed. it van lwiattd out
tbat Otlbert aM AeAa.atM did oat as aUtO this Wad MAI.
0. xetion vu at" tr *01", "0"4 *d by "W that, time'. psymad far
tM p uoipati" "rant with North falls hate OntvorsW for avert!" of
ntorltaa a Meow O MA watt etde of eevor false! ilea tat AprwM
u tallewr
cent of avarststal vattrum trove LW to 16"...1. tt1 .1!
11% at astt of eu ett low liar. u.u u...u u. 16. . 1
lalitoarta6 Peal. 1..., Y i 1.1-r.,.... n
f M'/ IOTA CCdP....... ,
Nrlta eArria.
LO. The Caaaeil ee"idored a"eoval of wsdwts to Stand!!" Colleen" '
1 Dollar to P lAdt for the diataatlon of 6116 trash piakww. S
P+Olid verbs WNW lteh dvskta ita"d !bat owntly ratdantlat
prbep !!'!eked 11 t< atlatell it alliyv to tM city. Shd fratiew Ceusotl
1 Ma romeow Mdod steedardl to lose easel M peal sertlae. yea this r~olaaft
aid beaaee of rntuvorty Prob eu, "tetwaael Prauw gel swirl a1
E yroblar, tM staff sreonateds defy M awtvida gsW4 bdmLP4 Aepat 11 1660
]laden was node by vela. lseadel M hb+PWe to aPPrew anoaleaata to
to who ladtatlee cellootlaa hu" to Provide lar the olsatastloa of alley trash.
pla". Mttisa Hrried.
, v
ti. SO Cowell aeeelQMed a}1M%l of Payuet of aMMsehlP duo to also
North Taos Cw4lasioa.
. I
Asolotat City Mialaf KW deli idvttod that Its 1 au view de ordtataa
to a eepaltedatleo to Prenan tht leech See" MrtreplN areas that useta lilt
Pattleip fsf eevor►1 years eMaodh tbo leeeawh wad litoaabft Davolopat
but gad twos hu eNalul tel,utry vith the Aid of Ito North Sws Caorteeiaa. {
"Los we Arlo by l aphlnl. eeaeadod by v! aroma to AD to" pool
f of ma-%Uramp duo to the North Tow cooailstod to the MMet of •!1~l. wta i
j eArsied.
rf as '~„`}+`I
y~
1
d"i
23
' duly 1, ly4o coetlowd
• 12. COUSUT AGENDAi
i Nation wr ae"• py gela sveoetiM py l0 4fa.thd tpr Con~ln6 Arend^
w a'prow" vlta !tear A-1, l!d I~?00-1 Lrdwtrlal Ilt• Ilan kopoduatim cad
i Md IITO lsommy limo Itaku► Truck reaawd as emeaoadd ty Covaeu Haber
aauar. Notion earrld.
(A) 5=01MKWA MM
. ' ] (1) {id 06?9, 4" M ye, "4 avardd to. the Lev liddor, '
1 fndurtriol Sat•reatioml at a tetai L!q 'Wiot of $29,OW, too Donaon. ,
(2) Puahur Order 11S?48 to
' lpRlrO Codalt vas a"rered in the
rymt a't 44,016.53. 4.
the aaacab of ) Purohao• Order 145924 ae I•lslla Z14atrlr vac a'Prowd !n
.too.
(3) ?uTa
(1) tidal Plat of Oak tote tidal Val apprevtd a reeesw•sdtd ,
%be Planing ad loaing Camidoioa. "
(1) rioal Plat ltah 1, SOGAW Is But *K114ty "root Addition
:.r'. vat apevwd Y, rwant"" 1y Pleaaiag and !taut Caailrlm.
- (3) ►iaal l@put of th♦ ftuw he" vu amrerti Y !0641160
•owlod It. the tlsaal~g sad Banta! Ce tralal.
13. St Owsatl dou "eroa lids 18*4 and 1140'vhteh Vero rW1 Bra
the CwNat Adtsda is felldvn
Do"" sees" ri to 4rw that l!i 1l?l0.1, c r
intmtrial hliew, ~ awdtd V Ce
oorriod. Prim" at 1e,g7.lo. Notlea .
tl) wtim we ardd 1I' Gaup', NaadN 3P talfafarre that kA 0"50 .
!i N'as~4y cite PioYW. 14 warded to Daly aatem Is tka,areust of 1!,?io. wtif
t *artlti.
14. Us ONOU raaaod Use tsNOtiliva haiaa at 10+1!'•a. to thane
l"a aattorr, "M Ntato, me""" and W44 Apsiataortl.
15. do Comaii rsoesvtaad into mus $woia At It 14,a.M.0 duly is 1940.
(A) Mlom I" ands b AMMae, OsawAsd 1r Iola to gpeso City
Nrrio WOm•'s poalaattsa at Oraat dsoolaa for roa"Kafteaa is the civil
♦ Oanfates. Matide arriod aauladaaiy.
1 ; (l) *ties vu aado by hopmus soeeolol by fou that bight oasler
be "Polic
to tho b w~ Modldoi S4Mda Advisory Counll. Notdea awrisd
f to) Netted vas as" by 1t&pbmj uaoaded 1d gtla this dope Lrhsi
` i~a risk" od the Berth tau u1mr ldmatlaa Amuritt. Notlsd' far id
mot" t4(•uretd at 1i13 a.n.j duly 1, 1140.
e
i
cm 1x=jwT
i
i
i
r J
City of Denton
Memorandum
July 1, 1960 ,
Agendal tem:
Consider a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the
Capital Improvement Plan.
Summary; ,
The Planning and Zoning Commission developed their recommendation in a series'of
ten meetings, and held a public hearing to gather input from the public on
capital improvement needs, A list of pro acts su gested, but not included in
last year's C.I.P. recommendation, as well as protects suggested at this year's
public hearing, were used in formulating the recommendation.
The Public Works and Planning Departments furnished the Planning and Zoning Commission
with an inventory of,straets in need of reconstruction and repaving. The streets
were divided into four categories:
Priority 1 - R/construction or overlay needed
Priority 2 - Reconstruction or overlay needed
Priorittyy 3 - Reconstruction or overlay needed
Table I.1 Overlay needed (Ranked only by distress points) 3
The al teria used'for ranking the streets in priority groups included traffic
voluai , distress points, land use, and riding quality,
Recommendations
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council call for s
bond election for. the purpose of providing revenue for reconstruction or overlay
of all streets included in priority 1 2, and 3. The Planning Commission further
recommends that the realignment of 8ei1 Avenue be a saparats item is the bond
election.
The Planning and loning Commission recommends the following projects for inclusion
in tho fifth year- of ti~a Capital Improvement Plan:
1. Southridge • Longridge Drive area drainage
2, Glenwood - Mistrood drainage
3. Coit Street at Emery and Cordell drainage
4, Reconstruction of sidewalks
r
The Planning Commission also recommends using the $270,000 earmarked for street
reconstructiom in the 1983 - 84 year for reconstruction of existing sidewalks
E along safe'sl:hool routes and construction of new sidewalks to servo the proposed
school along, Teasley Line,
If the City Council chooses not to call for a bond issue, or if the issue fails,
the Planning and toning Commission recommends sponding the entire budget for the
fifth year of the Capital Improvement Plan for street reconstruction or overlay,
and leaving the $270,000 in the fourth year for street reconstruction.
4r• .r
t
..1
e
T ....-r- ..r r ♦ n.. w:f T:' ..n • ...,•r.....,.'IIY V.•.ll q. L. +Y"Y•w.~.~j~y\.'1, 4. .;!I\ i
, Page Two w•~fi~`
Fiscal Summary:
Priority 1 - Reconstruction or overlay
Priority 2 • ReconstructiOn or overlay
Priority 3 » Reconstruction or overlay 3~6 666p
2,676,665
i 728 6d
r (In todayIs'dol ar'si inflation
and Engineering coot het inCluded3
Southridge . Lompidge Drive area drainage
Glenwood - Mistywood
drainage
Q ;
Colt Street at Emaery and ell drainage 6 2.839 l
Reconstruction of sidewalks 351,206 '
141,435
C,
' {Inflation and Engineering cost '
• irtcludedf
lterne ives:
A.' Accept the Planning and Zoning Commission recommandetion and tali for a
bone election.
8. Rlfect the planning and Zoning
and use fifth year funds fo Canrnis5lort recommendation for a bond
r street reconstruction or overlay, election
C. Mbdify the Planning and Zoning cotimisston reeommandatiort.
Exh;
86 Prioritized Street inventory
C. Suggested Projects
J
i
I
r ,
Owl
r
i
• I
4
iii nut es
Planning and Zoning Commission
Juno 18, 1980
i
The regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was held on
Juno 18, 1980 at 5:00 p.m.' in the Council Chan6ers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Marilyn Gilchrist, Robert LaForte, Carole Busby, Linnie McAdams,` i
Andy Sidor, and Bill Brady. Staff members present were Charles
Watkins, Rick Svehla, and Susan Wigand. `
I r
+ ABS61f," 'None.
Chairperson Linnie McAdams called the meeting to order. ,
•I. Approve the minutes of the June 4, 1980 meeting.
Motion was made by Marilyn Gilchrist and seconded by Carole Busby to approve
the minutes of the June 46 1980 meeting, Motion Carried, unanimously.
Chairperson Linnie McAdams explained the procedural policy for the meeting to the
audience.
11. Public Hearings:
A, °Z•1453. This is the petition of Mr. Clark J. Richards requesting a'
change of.zoning from single family SF-7) to commercial (C).classification
on a parcel approximately 5.4 acres in site located along the, north side of
Morse Strait between Newton Street and Woodrow Lane,
Charles Watkins explained the case.
Tom Jester, representing Mr. and Mrs. Ferrells, spoke in favor,of the
,
request. a
Clarke Richards spoke in favor of the,request.
Dorothy Minter spoke in opposition to the request. 1
Hancy Perry, who had just recently purchased a home on Baldwin, spoke in
opposition the the request,
Jerry Alexander, who had also just recently purchased a home on Saldwii:,
spoke in opposition to the request.
r
Charles Watkins gave the staff recoomendation, which was denial.
to
I Tom Jester spoke in rebuttal.
The Commission discussed O e case. Motion was made by Andy Sidor and
seconded by Carole seutby to deny Zm14S3, Motion eaErried unanimously..
•
Ir N ~.~.~a+~~
i
i
Page ~ i"vJ . ,
II1. Considerations: ,
A. Consider the final plat of E. McKinney Street Addition.
charles Watkins gave the staff recommendation.
M, tlon was made by LaForte and seconded by Brady to approve the final plat
of the E. McKinney Street Addition. ;
8. Consider the final replat of the Villago Phase 1.
Charles Watkins stated that all the regulations had been complied with.
Motion was made by Brady and seconded by Andy Sidor to approve'the final
replat of the Village Phase 1. Motion carried unanimouslly.
C. Consider the final plat of Oak Bend Estates. 1 .
Charles Watkins' recommended approval. F
Motion was made by LaForte and seconded by Brady to approve the final plat
of Oak Bend Estates. Motion carried unanimously. '
D. Consider the Capital Improvement Plan.
The Commission discussed street reconstruction and overlay. The commission,
discussed drainage problem areas in Denton with the Director of Public Works,.
Rick Svohla. They elso considered sidewalks. 1
Motion was made by LaForte and seconded by Gilchrist to recommend the
following to the City Council:
The Planning A Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council call for a
bond election for the purpose of providing revenue for reconstructign or
overlay of all streets included in priority 1, 2, and 3, and 'recommends that
the proposed realignment of Bell Avenue be a separate item in the bdnd eleetlon.
I
The Planning 6 Zoning Commission' further recommends the following projects
for inclusion in the.fifth year of the Capital Improvement Plan:
1. Southridge - Longridge Drive:area drainage,
2. Glenwood - Mistywood drainage
C ! 3. Coit Street at Emery and Cordell drainage
4. Reconstruction of existing sidewalk along safe school routes
5.. Removlna $210,000 from street reconstruction in the 1983 -.84 year and
adding the 1770,000 to the 1984 - 85 year to be usdd for reconstruction i
of existing sidewalks and new sidewalk to serve the proposed school along ~
Teasley Lane,
If the City Council chooses not to call fora bond issue, tifor the
tho Planning 5 Zoning Commission recommends spending the entire e budget budget for the ~
fifth year of the Capital Improvement Plan for treat reconstruction and leave the $270,000 in the fourth•year for street reconstruction.
The motion carried unanimously. s
The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
• i w i.•., . ".~h.' ,f.. +Y•LJV.i K..IL ~'rd'L. '•A.Mi}iJah•7f~ri
1++' rwlar.~
i
.wlTw
Yoe %11
1 -.0
J I , Qtr
~ 1• ~ . l rl > r..'~~ ~ N1M0 0 1"~ 'r i, J~, 1 tilt. •f} I'
~ y •t `i :i:~ 1.ta
r Lj Y
1, 1 1
.I.Nwt♦ ~~0• ( ! • X171 sf'L4'}t~~i 1af. ~i,rI
El
VIP
' • ' L 1~• r. "'RRR
' t ; . ~ ; t 1v Y J • ~.1
Da rtY ALTERNATE
J 1 i~
' t ~ i~ ~i p r• 4 r J~ J t. 141 4~, t..
I r 1.. l J, ~ { i f ¢ IrJak ~ . A!, I,o~. .
1 • S
TWU
SJ ~1 1~ 1 ~ '4 'r 1 IW ~.T 1 ~J
, 1 f 1 ! X11 t~
:1 J l ' 4.4
1 t I'
to NZ
~E:.J~ l 1 .•li ~ ~ E, ,f• . ti~r r i,~. 'C: 3,,'x;1
CO-
' GlNSA~ . t
1. 7
L*i 1r J'/' • ri. 1f X1.7 UL~NO
"Ar
y 1' Y 1 ~ . Yuji
1 ~ Y~.y. 1v
1 ,
MEA000E; 1.rd5 yy!rd A jy'
t
F
Street Maintenance Program
First Priority
Boundaries Length Estimated Riding Distress
Street Name From o Miles Class Construction quality Points
Locust Eagle University 1.70 A44C R--1666700 2 76
Bell University Sherman 0,30 C30C 91150 3 53
Elm University Eagle 1.70 A40C 721250 2 61 f
Oak Bolivar Jagoe 1.00 A36C 40000 1 65
Hickory Cedar Austin 0.20 A48C 91860 2 67
Hickory Avenue C Welch 1.10 R-4400000 / 3 75
Hickory Carroll Cedar 0.10 A36C R-36,800 2 15
Locust University Orr 0165 A34C 220880 2 64
Avenue A Highland McCormick 0.55 R34C R-184,100 2 75 `
Congress Oakland ^onder 0195 C34C 839440 2 6g ;
1 Carroll Northridge ,doss 0.50 AMC 200040 2 60 ~?r
t 'Mingo Withers Mockingbird 0,20 A30S 12,950 a 68''
Oak Austin Bolivar 0.20 A50C 10,090 2 35 i N
Hickory Austin RR 0430 A55C 115960 2 52 y
i Oak , RR Austin 0.20 A40C 8t5Oo 2 5A t ;
Bonnie Brae U.S, 77 University 0435 C26S R-113 75
` 1.826,080
_ _i.:.___...
a
is
t
~A
A. I
i
1
Audra McKinney End of Divide 0.30 C55C 170960 1 62
Nottingham University Windsor 0.60 A40C R-340,000 2 62
Welch Eagle Chestnut 0.40 C40C 57,000 2 59
Welch Chestnut Oak 0.30 40,560 1 57
Barnard Hickory Eagle 0.60 A3OC 486300 2 65
~ i
West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 0.70 A36C 24,640 2 50
0.30 A64C R-180,000 4 70
t, West Oak IH-35 Y
68
Sunset Anna University 0.35 R34C 320324 1
Bolivar Congress University 0.80 C30C R-257,800 4 96
Bolivar Parkway ;ingress 0.10 C30C R-33,500 4 100
R-111 ?00 3 102
Oriole Mockingbird Loop 288 0.35 R34C
Glenwood Windsor University 0.70 R34C R-2341300 2 70
' , ~
Greenwood Laurel Wood Sherman 0.90 R34C 816680 2 51
Frame RRX S. iickinney 0.30 R34C 201560 21 56
Fry Scripture Hickory 0.20 R34C 17,040 2 52
3 66
Bernard Willowwood 1H-35 0.10 f~36C 14,000
W#Atway Bolivar Fulton 0.45 R34C 350840 2 69
64
Mistywood Nottingham' Glenwood 0.45 R44C 410130 2,
Alice Congress University 0.75 R34C 666400 2 :j
Mood McKinney texas 4150 R34C 17,600 2 67 s r'~I
w,r c=l
1,687,830 ,
is
f
4
q
k
Crawford Texas McKinney 0130 R34C 100660 2 64,
r=
Headlee Hinkle Bolivar 0.60 1434C 410123
2 61
F
I Denison Headlee University 0160 R34C 1. 1.600 2 67
3,693,190 i
I ;
699280
h 1}Cf
10
+w.AIL..MW4V'M1Y~+W.w^'•'r~"'_..... __.-._..A...~~..w.. ~1,.....r....... .....M, ..w~.._. v . ~ rw
' i
i
i
1
S~ r(
x
4
Street Maintenance Program
Second Priority
f Boundaries Length Estimated Ridingg Distress
4 Street Mane roar o Miles Class Construction Cost uelit Points
Stuart Se11ne Sherman 1.00 C30C 30,500 42
4
Audra End of Divide New Paisley 0.10 R-209400 2 102
Crescent Malone Carroll 0.35 R44C 620320 1 46
t Shady Oaks Willow Springs Woodrow 0.60 R34C 311120 1 47
Willow Springs Dallas Drive Shady Oaks 0.20 C50C 91860 1 43
Ruddell Paisley Willis 0.20 C22S 96500 4 58
t Hercules Redstone Stuart 0.25 C60C 169430 1 67
Hercules Picadilly Sheraton 0.30 C34C 100560 1 56
Mulkey Oaktree Audra 0.45 P25S 31,375 1 47
Mockingbir:: McKinney Oriole 0.50 R34C 176600 1 461'
i
Prairie Avenue E Bonnie Brae 0.45 R.1509640 73
Bolivar Northridge University 0.70 R34C R-234,330 2 76
Walnut Austin Cedar 0110 R34C 23,520 2 60 `
Austin McKinney Mulberry 0.15 R34C 150280 2 58
Cedar Mulberry McKinney 0.20 R34C 1 176040 2 65
Pecan Cedar Austin 0.10 R40C 14,250 2 46
684,735
f
3
6
Willow Springs Shady Oaks Kerley 0.20 C34C 11,040 2 52
Hobson Lane Teasley FM-1830 1.15 C26S 549620 2 61
James Massey Ft. Yorth Dr. 0.70 R25S R-142,800 4 1?5 {
Rose Paisley Texas 0.15 R25S R-30,000 2 89
Texas Ruddell Crawford 0.05 R25S R-1062x0 3 82
e, i v R- sl,Soo
Pearl Denton Carroll 0.75 iQavC -R-254060 79
Emery Fulton &2001 Carroll 0.35 R34C 32,320 2 60
Colt Westwey Congress 0.70 R34C 540640 2 63
Denton Crescent Hickory 0.75 R34C 56,400 1 56
Anna Panhandle University 0.60 R34C 41,120 2 52
Woodhaven Mistywood Emerson 0.30 R34C R-100,430 2 77
Cherrywood Greenwood Woodland 0.20 R34C 666950 2 71
Woodland Cherrydood Sherman 0.50 R34C 310600 2 69 f
K4yewobd Crestwood Greenwood 0.55 R34C 296360 2 62
Crestwood Live Oak University 0.65 R34C 49,360 2 5t,
Avenue C Mulberry Oak 0.20 R40C 90860 2 1`:43 "
Avenue B Maple Underwood 0.30 R30C 19,150 2 58
Thms Oak Emery 0.85 R34C 590920 1 58 d
Linwood Sherman Crestwood 6.26 R34C 89800 2 51 j
Amarillo Gregg Panhandle 9100' 0.40 R34C 34,080 1 56
1,095,850
t,, rwr~
1
j
1 Ponder Oak Linden 6100' 0.50 R34C 470600 1 56
II s
Monterrey Sierra Sherman 0.35 R34C 321320 2 56
W1111amsburg Nottingham Jamestown 0.20 R34r 71040 2 55 j
Roberts Northwood Bell 0.35 R34C 326320 a 2 55
E Rockwood Emerson Laurelwood 0.30 R34C 20560 1 54
Mimosa Bolivar Hinkle 0.55 R34C 390360 2 54
Laurelwood Kgyewood University 0.45 R34C 25840 2 53
i
Hopkins Drive Dallas Drive East End 0.30 R34C 101560 1 53
Manhattan Sherman Stuart 0.30 R34C 40,560 2 52
Stanley Emery Panhandle 0150 934C 376600 1 52
Robinwood Emerson University 0.60 R34C 41,120 1 51
Henn Oakland Locust 0.10 R25C 12,460 2 62
Normal Oak Scripture 0.15 R34C 51280 2 59
t
Second Bolivar Locust 0.20 R34C 17,040 1 5E
Boyd Tyler Lattimore 0.20 P,34C 170040 1 53
Marietta Oak Scripture 0.20 R34C 7j040 1 61
Cindy Hwy, 3BO Hampton 0.55 R25S R-112,200 >t 96
Marshall IMy. 380 Hampton 0.60 R25S R-1220400
s
Hampton Marshall Marsh Branch 0.76 R25S R-153,000 Z 79
Lariat Hampton Marshall 0175 R25S 350620 1 67
IOOF Eagle Highland 0.15 R25S R-300&0 J 110 ;
4;676.666 8950080 .6;268;855
x, •sB, for L,~y~, z46' ; `z,.. {
r7
I 4
Street Maintenance Program
Third Priority
Boundaries Length Estimated Riding Distress
Street Name From To Miles Class Construction Cost Quality Points
Bonnie Brae University Scripture 0.75 C38S R-280,500 3 90
Audra Paisley Loop 288 0155 C55C R-299,470 2 102
f
F Payne North Leg IH-35 1.20 R20S R-2440800 3 77
Maple Avenue 0 Bernard 0.70 R34C R-2340330 2 83 l
Spencer Woodrow Loop 288 1.40 R25S R-285,600 2 92
S. Locust South End IH 35 0.20 R25S R-40,800 2 86
Acme Bernard S. Locust 0.25 R25S R-51,000 2 94
Roselon Ft, Borth Dr. County'line 1635 R26S R-2761400 2 '
Avenue E IH 35 Eagle 0.05 C34C R-16.740 2 lot r
` 1,728,640 7,987,495
764, 95s~
F
I `
f
ply.
1
4
•
I
Table III
DENTON STREET INVENTORY,
SUMMARY SHEET
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
Category 3 - Overlay Needed
Priority 3
Boundaries Length Est4Mat d Riding Distre44
Street Name from To Miles Clats Construction uaiit Points
Camden CC Londonderry Cul de sat 0.05 R34C 11760 2 : 69
Kingswood Londonderry Cut de sac 0.05 R34C 11760 2 67
I
Northwood Ter Edgewood Cut de sac 0.10 A34C 31520 1 65
Frier Tuck Locksley Cut de sac 0.10 R34f 3,520 2 62
Scripture IN-35 Bonnie Brae 0.50 C28 23,750 3 62
z4
Frame Woodland University 0,10 934C 31520 2 61
So. Locust IN 35 Eagle 0.10 025S 41750 3 bp' Y}
Preston Place Greenwood End 0110 034C 130520 2 'S0
C&Vbell McKinney Paisley 0.35 R34C 22,320 1 41`
s
Houston Place End Marietta 0.60 934C 21,120 1 41y.i
Fannin Bernard Avenue B 0.40 A34C 24,080 1 42. }
palaiwow, Glenwood Kayewood 0.05 R34C 116760 1 42
-r
1 Snyder Wayne Tyler 0.15 A34S 11,010 1 Q
S
Ili
l
Y,
1f~
11
~r v iWiC~
1
Travers Hopkins Orive Piping Rock 0.05 R34C 119760 1 42 1
Victoria Nottingham Churchill 0.25 R34C 86800 1 42 ;
# 01steria W111owwood Golf 0.10 R34C 3,520 1 42
Woodford Ct, Woodford Dead end 0.05 R34C- 10760 2 42
El`Peseo Carmel Santa Monica 0135 CIVC 16,430 1 43
Highland Elm Welch 0.60 R30C 281300 2 43
Pershing Stuart Atlas 0.20 R34C 71040 1 43
Withers Oakland Mingo 0,30 934C 300560 1 43
Austin Oakland Parkway 0170 R25C 47,240 1 44
Driftwood Trail Stuart Bell 0.25 R44C 21,740 1 44
frame RR Tracks Grove 0.25 934C 2818co 1 44
Kendolo. Willowwood IH-35 0.50 R34C 173x.00 1 44
Robin Circle Nottingham Cut de sac 0.10 04C 3$20 1 44 y`
Sandy Creek Angelina Bend Angelina Bend 0,15 R34C 56200 1 44
Avenue 'a Oak Hickory 0.05 R40C 2,125 I 45 E ;
Edgewood Northwood Crestwood 0110 R34C 130520 1 15 j
Industrial Hickory Bell 0.20 R40C 280300 1 45,
magnolia Hinkle Bolivar 0.55 R34C 29,160 z 4e I
Northwood Greenwood Roberts 0.20 R34C 7,040 1 4S, '
Westwood Pervin Willowwood 0135 R34C 221320 1 45
NC I
h j
r S:•'
owl
d tf
i
Bradshaw Paisley McKinney 0.30 R34C 101560 1 46
Egan Malone Bolivar 0180 R34C 681160 1 46
First Bolivar Locust 0.15 R34C 5,280 1 46
Sawyer Oakland Locust 0.15 R25C 13,160 1 46
Shawnee Mingo University 0.30 R34C 20,560 1 46
Third Bolivar Oakland 0.30 R25C 70390 1 46
Chasswood Pembrooke Woodbrook 0.10 R34C 31520 1 47 j
Collier IN-35 Eagle, 0.25 R34C slow 1 47 1
Gold Ct. Wisteria End 0.10 R34C 31520 1 47 ,
Lovell Scripture Egan 0.10 R34C 131520 2 47
Myrtle Daugherty Collins 0.25 R34C BOND 2 47
Old Lee Ct. Burning Tres Cut de sac 0.05 R34C 119760 1 47
Amherst 6eor9etown Hinkle 0.40 R34C 34,080 1 48
Gary Locust Bolivar 0.10 R34C 3,520 1 48 'Jr.!
Heather Stratford Oxford 0.60 R34C 476600 2 4!i
I
Ponue D Highland IN-36 0125 R34C Boom 2' 49 11 Broken Arrow Old Orchard Burning Tree 0130 R34C 10,560 1 49
Foxcroft Emerson Emerson 0.70 R34C 440640 1 49
Royal Lane Mistywpod Rockwood 0.10 R44C 149695 1 44
Santa Monica El Osseo Hobson 0165 A34C 29.360 1 49 F
7 809,660 {
. .~.~..~~.wn.~r.W.~w.rw-WClMMFNNNIMO{W~
y.
M
it
j
jJA i
s.,
~4 114
i
SCOPE OF REPORT
F ,
j
Investigations have been made in sufficient detail to make
reasonable comparisons of cost of three different means of providing
a grads separation. The preliminary designs developed herein are
s
r based upon information taken from available maps, visual inspection °
of the site and such field surveying as was necessary to develop the
general features of the proposed structures.
Estimated construction costs were arrived at through the use
of cost records available for similar structures in this general area, ,
adjusted for recent oven-all increases that have occurred in the con- i A
atruction industry, In the event there is an appreciable time lapse
before construction is initiated the estimated construction costs
would need to be adjusted to conform to further variation in construction
costs, The estimated costa presented herein represent the approximate
cost of construction including engineering and normal contingencies,
but do not include the cost of right-of-way acquisition or the satisfying
of possible damage claims and attendant legal expenses or costs that
might be incurred by the railroad and utility companies brought on by {
the construction.
! Three possible means of providing a cr'oesing have been
I f ,
investigated, Tbese are: "
• 3
Mir-
V
14 1
O,`^, , i
Plan "A'! - Overpase the existing railroad within the
present right-of-way.
Y
t Plan "B" - Underpass the existing railroad within the
present right-of-way.
!L, C1 I Underpass the existing railroad by construction
of ramps into the adjacent creek and utilizing
the present paved channel to cross through the f .
railroad's existing concrete trestle.
Right-of-way considerations might require some modification
of the alignments shown in arriving at the most economical facility;
Those three plans are presented separately in the text which follows.
Plan All
This would consist of an overpass centered within the present
right-ot-way of McKinney Street as shown on the accompanying j
drawing.
Under this plan, Hell Avenue and Railroad Avenue would be {
closed to through traffic it their intersection with McKinney Street,
Frame Street would remain open and would have adoquato clearance.
The approach grade from the west would be 9 percent, which approaches
it the maximum desirable grade. This grade Is necessary, however,
in order to provide the required clearance of 22.3 test over the exist-
,
tng tracks.
All
a
dial
• 1
The estimated cost of constructing the overpass is $740,600.00.
Maintenance and operation costs for this type of structure would be
relatively small in comparison to an underpass.
Plan "BOO
This plan consists of an underpass centered within the present
right-of-way of McKinney Street as shown on the accompanying drawing.
This method of crossing would require the highest construction
cost but it has definite advantages in approach grades which can be
f
established. The 'approach grade from the west can be fixed no steeper'
than b percent, which would be more desirable than the 9 percent grade
•
required for the overpass outlined in Plan "A". t
i
The length of the structure would be approximately 1 000 feet,
.
as compared to 1, 80
0 feet whack would be required for an overpass.
I
Although the construction cost for the underpass will bn higher, it is
probable that contingent costs relating to the effect on adjoining pro-
party would be less. It is not possible, however, to de tormine 'with
any degree of accuracy the magnitude of any reductions which might
be realized in this manr. Some modification of the existing Pecan
Crook channel would be required to allow the construction of the under-
pass. In addition, a pump station would be necessary to lift storm
water and ground water which might accumulate in the underpass into
Pecan Creek, Mother major item, adding to the cost of this structure,
is the necessity of keeping rail traffic undisturbed. This would require f
.^n
I ME
a t•
f
constructing the bridge under rail traffic using falsework.
Since it will be necessary to pump storm water from this
structure, it is probable that at some time storms in excess of the
a design capacity may occur, allowing water to accumulate in the
t underpass for brief periods. To construct sufficient capacity to
meet any possible contingency would be uneconomical. This situation
f '
reduces somewhat the desirability of this type of structure.
The estimated construction cost of the underpass is $1, 100,000. 00.
Maintenance and operation costs, brought about largely by the necessity
of pumping storm water, would be substantially more than would be
required for an overpass.'
Plan II`^'Il a
This plan contemplates using the existing Pecan Creek channel
E as a means of crossing the, railroad. Access to this channel would be
provided by ramps on each side of the railroad. The accompanying
drawing defines the construction features which would be required,
This plan provides a very economical means of crossing the
. r
railroad. `Severe limitations in its use, however, at critical times
would exist by virtue of the fact that it would-be unusable durlaig
periods of rain when water collects in Pecan Creek. In addition, a
veetical clearancs of only 12,0 feet is available, compared to a mini-
mum desirable standard of 16,5 feet in vottical clearance. The haeardr
J
attendant to the use of such a facility are impossible to evaluate
with any precision, but there is no questioA that the structures
outlined under Plan "A" and Plan "S" would p*ovide a conziderabiy
higher degree of safety to the public.
The estimated cost of constructing the facility outlined r ,
htrein is $60,000.00, not including signalling systems and other ; 3 .
protective devices that may be required to control traffic. `
sr fi {
J4ti.w
,t
az ::J
4 41
I
,
x
l i•
1 r
a 1' r'.
rtr t
t
PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Since McKinney Street is a major traffic artery with many
businesses located along McKinney Street, both the handling of
traffic and the duration of construction will be veryy important.
The contract will be setup so that one contractor (Street-
Contractor) can do the storm,sawer, bridge and paving work
while another contractor,(Sanitaryy Sewer Contractor) can do the
sanitary sewer work. Th s schedule is set up assuming that two
separate contractors will work separately. Prior to beginning
construction, the contractors shall submit a tentative sch-
edule for each section. This time table should be updated
monthly or when any major obangges.occur. Any suggastione for
revision of this schedule which in the City Staf£ opinion will
allow improved access/ahorter.duration of street closure to
this area, through cooperation of contractors or operations
will be considered.
The sanitary smear line from the Bridge erat will be 'a very j
time critical operation because delays in this section will ;
impact the Paving Contractors progress and inconvience to f
citizens, Therefore an incroased amount for liquidated' damages
will be charged in the eve;tt that the work is not completed
in time. Tha:sanitarySewer,Contractor will have to install
the main and services io,south while maintaining full traffic
on McKinneyy Street, Connection to the service lines and
mains on tha north side of McKinney Street will bo made one
block at a time with provisions for providing traffic flow '•m
McKinney Street during all, operations. The contractor shoUEd
locdta lines on the north aide of McKinney Street then bl,.c,c
the south half of McKinney Street to extend service lines.
Then block the north half of McKinney Street after opening the
' south half in order to complete the connections. V e sanitary
sewer work shall be completed +A thin 50 working days so that no
delay to the Street Contraotor will occur.
The Street construction will be done in'two sections. The
Street Contractor will Login construction of Section X for the
Bridge and the paverant between Bell Ava; and the Bridge at the
time the Sanitary Sewer Contractor begins his work. Section 11
will be the area between the Brida and Ruddell Street, the
area between Ruddell and Jannie will be worked half at one time i
while maintaining through traffic in both directions, The
scheduling of all operations should be closely coovdindted with
the City Engineer and shoulitnolude bridge, storm sewers, ax
cavation lists stabilization concrete work, raving, and all
street closures or partial eiosures.
i
i
4f
CITY OF CENTa'E
I'iE10ANDUN
a
DATE OF P-9711IG: naremher 9r IQRA
CITY CO;F';C!L AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITE14 IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA)
Acce,tance.of,construction plans forrpaving and drainage improvements on
{ McKinney Street.
,SUMMARY.
r Review access problems with Council and get citizen input before putting
plans out for bids.
FISCAL SUPv4ARY: I
None
ACTION REQUIRED:
t
Coukil should accept plans
r ~
1
ALTERNATIVES:
Council could ask for changm to the plans.
STAFF RECOPVZIDATIONSs
Staff'recommands acceptance of the plans.
EXHIDITS: r
to Memo to Rick Svehla
f.. Its Preliminary copy of Constructicn Schedule
,
r It
r ,
'j 4
s
b
fU A
III
~N
V. 0. III
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
'i
TO: Rick Svehla
FROM: Greg Edwards
II
DATE; November 261 1980
RE, Acceptance of construction plans for paving and drainage improvements
on McKinney Street
j
s.
The,City of Denton has had preliminary plans on display at both the E, McKinney j ;
Street Fi
tion an the plans withamost ofdthe cim entslbeing poo relatedito driveways/eccees toted I
Properties, We are adding several driveways to satisfy the driveway comments
which have been raised.
Many of the citizens have been concerned saw t access to their propertie
and businesses during construction. Enclosed 1s our proposed consttruction f
schedule. I feel that we have held the number of working days allMd to
p
a minimum and will seek to keep access to all roperties o n as Muth as
possible. During constructions businesses w111 typically provided with ,
access from side streets, When direct actess 1s unav l lable perking on
side streets such as Frame Street and 9ra,ishaw with pedestrian access from
y there will be provided., The five businesses on the .north side of McKinney
Street between Frame Street and the proposed bridge will provide soar access
problems4 A temppo0rary one-lane access from,Frame Street.between thr proposed
north curb and the existing channel could significantly data these access
pproblems, Four businesses on the south side of McKinney Strait between
Frame Street and the proposed bridge maybe able to get access from Oak
Street with the City providing temporary drives.
The eltelr)attve of working the street under full traffic, in my opinion,
would extend the duration of construction, expose both the contractor and
the citizens to increased hazards during construction, w significantly
increase the cost of the project, and would not fully alleviate access
problems
I would like the Council to be aware of some of the access problems in this
project and also give citizens a chance to discuss items that wiil affect
them. After this discussion, 1 would like the Council to approve these plans
with whatever sug4eatlons or conditions they 'desire, before we put this
project out for bblidso
t~~~s
Greg
i
4
i
i
k
It will be mandatory that the contractor make every effort to
leave the roadway open to,lo.cal traffic at the and of every
work day, He must aiso..provide limited access to local traffic
during working hours whenever possible, Although this project
will present some difficult problems, with proper planningg
t and scheduling the contractor should be able to complete ft in
a timely and orderly fashion... Any contractor who is unwilling
to schedule his construction.activitiess proceed in a cooperative
manner, and work for.t4q beat Anterest of the citizens of Denton,
should refrain from submitting a proposal on this Job,
c
f
F
,
1#
kr t, r
y.
r,
•
h
Decembfar 2, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #
SUBJECT'
Approval of the Request of Mr. R. 0. McDonnell to furnish
sewer service outside of the City Limits on Grissom Road.
SUMMARY' j
Mr, McDonnell would like to install 1200 of 8 sewsr , liner
and is willing to pay the total cost of such installation,
He has agreoad to meet all City of Denton requirements and
e cifications, Mr. McDonnell has also agreed to transfer
all his equity back to the City for this sewer extension, !
The purpose of this line will be to serve two buildings at a
school for retarded children.
t ,
The lift station that will be tapped in to has plenty of
` capacity to service this project.
FISCAL SUMMARYt
Estimated Cost
i, 12001 of 8" Sewer Line 0 $19.00 per foot,.,., ..,$22,800 i
ACTION REQUIREDI
Approve or deny Mr, McDonnell's request for sever service on
Al
Grissom Road,
H
%
Sy RDCOMMFNDATIONt '
.v,
The Public Utilities Boards at their meeting of Novsraber 2S, 1980, recommended to the City Council approval of this
request,
Respectfully,
R, E, Nelson
Director of Utilities
.
EXHIBIT I Letter from Mrs R, 0. McDonnell
it Hip
I, &T
s'
4j
~ I
`
P 0
C, 4
f/~4
- -
1
{
i
.
McDONNELL ENTERPRISES, INC.
M. 3 Box 45 Accounting Office
V hftesboro, Texas 76273 1080 Nantucket Suite 102
..?14-684.5907 Richardson, Texas 750E0
214-234-0644 {
I
November 20, 1980 f
I -
i
City of Denton
Mmicipal Building
ATM, W. E. E. Jones
Supt, Water & Sewer Works
Denton, 7X 76201
Dear Sir= C
End2 led please fLvS two of the Grissom street sever "extensions r
showing the elevation of the ground and the ran-hole elevation.
We are askirg'for permission to tie on to the City man-hole, whereby
the City will furnish us sewerage.
this We'uill Ci o S lice"td sewer
and aim, typa and'sizo~oe f omiuns which includes 04f ee pip all fittings end aai-holes. We till reluire
saeemert fYnds the County when the sewer line is oocpleted tc City
SpeoificAtions and a mva1. We pmpose to tramfer'all of otx equity
in said sewer extena~sn, '
We wou]~ ap<p'rseeiate en'earlyy approval on this It will sservica two
half -way houses for retarded children t+itich there is a great'~need in
Dalton for this type of facility,
'Sincerely,
t!icDOt~i~E2i TNTI7tPRISE9, ID1C. J
R, 0. McDonnell, President 2
r
$OMcD/jm
r
y
t
At M'6 '
Y yy}}yy Xy1:6
Tfir~I "
1
I.
;~~.3 (r?s• j!'~,: tT<r'r'r. ror! Tf4?v''''• 'x'1{.yltkJ •d j'u. Ir;•, f.ta~ ~fi ; f~ J f`12ti.\ t ~F' {Y le.+I.
e 'V h,t r • X (•i v 1 ` fry r,' rt 15 , 4 a M1 y ! > vi ~ Gik t4' Y .R t' tr
"f" ~r~',~~~4a CX..~~ fit. t~'X'rx r,~v 1 t~ ~ i f '3 t . y { CY, `t~ Z .i ~ S~ y,~ \ t Ga•.~,
' f a{~.. }~f♦6 { iR ti ra~, a ly \ r ia` ''cr, r 4 t .r'"~ !1 ~ ~ ~
~ f} ~r,ltlr f'. ~,S ~J •iL \ rtt" t l~~. Y M1~. a c:.,.e ~6t iSJ «J 7 at'~ .t '.y S h G . 1 u,r.~ yvy
110 (•1•l1e "44 ~t {~~4`~NM ~Yr Jv. 4G~u ` FJ,M ~f rti;T /r j'"~iJ ~l ra!'li t 4 ~i r t ,a tt~
4J•.. a ..r, +ff,,}~l"'''~~a` Pf 1 ♦ . I t w Y 1 .t ' 'i' . n
^'S'jl rfr.N Ra{q V7r44ev i F~ J • by sr Ytjr• r
~ r~ ~ ` F { I r 4.: ~ r . .sr , •y t ~ • 4 1,~ 'y'y'xf i ' t J, ♦
r sj `f
A~f r.Y~♦~~.~}\ '~y 3 ''li\,t 4s.:lil J, l~°~L ~r: P1 ifl i p t ~~,L Arr A 1~ 'rJ~l
i~ Jp7 Fr4°1:. r.~.1` ~ P,a.,tJ' ,r l"Il~~'r ,?~'♦~1 Sf rn': q o.+. ry ♦ ,y 11~..,w rs *r j~~ .f{
'C^r` 17 '~rjv''•`j r; , 4.'•1 •Yyhr X.y. ✓ , r } '1 r'• f w) r,:
k, 14.
'I rld~.~IF?ry4
:%~K. r • S.~~~ r ,•>w' ~e 7'f6 41
^fI
E rYR ~ p~ ~ir ~ - ~ L I a . 'Y i ~ " ~1 rr.' • ' Y ~ r S ~'ti7'n~': ~~'1+1~, uYr~~
'.~'{f•tV ,r f<.. SWj-,F-1~7 1 SJ.
'Y]Ip'4y!`.•~IS~J`):•I/}JI,F/. ti•}Si #t-'h'.~y•.r^N~•aaA I'.7 ~;7J1YJ i~'.L7.~`I •~~'~slV'.
;I .4ift i t,~r""`'rs+ty yl"3'Yj•',f`~~.) ♦~'t•f r• ~~r ..rh
' ~e ~ " ' YY I • f.4'f
5 '~"'YYa b'-!
43 S r ♦ , : ~ + J , I a Y'1+~~~. ~ I I i ' ' 1
TA W ..~1
A ~'rd L~~S+~Q;!A4',yif}4 4'S 4yl"r.r , Ii. rr •yt;'.ir 1y:1 N YM•^L•~R'/rf rp.• ` ..11 a %r
7 r ~y~~ty'.}Spt %Yi~,,{9~~~'Rly'rt I"r •a j S _ ~ t}~ 1 ' }Y 1 •l ~ r 1 r '.i I11 i~1'• ~ r f I ;ti; ~'Ly it 7 •
r • ;7~'.7~9'r`~y~p%TY,:%1fMi~•'~~'!. yy,ti..~S,,3tr7t'r"}►,~1,' f. r r,!'• rr~I 'i• i'~ •I~+~,.I
~~p11 + 4 'fe !L tr 'Ji,jt ~ ry Ii fp I i ~ f L r t EX..
Y[,.~~+1 'N '~~•(~~fh~'1'~ a' v. Je ' ,.~t ,I ,$:L+ N!• r,Y°"'M'~!S'o4~~~
x `•(rr irk ~'1 ti '.i++. ..~Y r r ."Yr~`"r i~'rr , 0~:~ 2, R.if
d j I•♦ a r1Y tr . ~ B I. ! }tr t`h 1. . rr r7,` ~ YI ~.r/ I,, ' j}IC•IMV t{ .
r , f~'i~p ~,~~t'%r ~ : ? j• Fir I• r,`^ ! Y t 'N ~ r'. ~ r,~.. •i rep •r J ~j i,,.. +^F7 yl
k_ }J !~f~ tF' 1• • 4*
I , { xl;r ♦`r' ,S/ 11 I},Jr1 Lt Y ."4 tr~•.
\'1 I{~1 •'Jj~r' ~ ~1a •,~j r. ~ , ♦yyr fft. Y• ,.ra~(11 ,~1, a Y..r •tt,; r y.r•
r A?~ja~r., YGf,il~ r•~ Of
refA:1 'ry r,l !'~~5 1 rf ~r ♦r~' ~ft`
~~l.jy`~`,.Fti r~.~FS•`j f':ythfi~ A.`S tld~ ,4~,. rr t/JJ(q.rr 3r'r.+ 'y`rlht4r5~4'r;.. .
1 r •'~J „3 r,r r~•)n S~ •Y f ~'4 rf f• ~.J YIII ..1. t'Ii • •i 4II1. S, ~
' 't tI, f•f l• r+ -A Y +h~ t ,7R I r. lrr~ / ire ? e r rCI ,V♦rl 1..
t L r ( V. r, n ,'7 r Jc x sM, l r.N o't" ' • ' rll' +r i t I , ' , x r ' ~
19 '♦J. btu f<[1~,~'fi`t1 ''Ari ,~►r'•~~`,j
.S I ~'i4~7p +♦~~...~~~Yr '+'r~. ~tlI•L1
d{ jZ,~r + ~ri.~}•~.r7w~CAt.~:it+'i •+~a i~r,, fI•"+ t~~~/.r•d'+ TIP
t r ..►A/ ~ '1 •+•4~1 IA Ia `,M:•
+ ) Q u 5»V Y'4"rS UT!' ''f'1, { } yr fz N
r 11fl))))Yl,iy~!}~, I~,,y 'r~eiv / I 1 l:f ' '3 t'p,',~irf~~r ila u f MI
Map.~.~ 'Y.T'°•t~iiK'. a6c. ~r~• Lr ~a. Y ~1 r 1 t{•( ^ ti,a'i • ' • .
r' ,tp • , :1 tie T. r I r Iaw er rrY ?'f1 h ~~r ,O'•I, /w.
S t• \ r /rapYt r as lyu.r 11 • . y~~
y f h l a ~'fjji • I f, 't lyy'!!n ~~r y., N f. r• ♦M'J f al • •,y hl r,
♦1•••i i7 A/.}}Y'.,,,ry~~rw-~ •d•~};^i,,:~i yr rYe~.i~J•sMJr~11'1 ^11~.r. ♦•~+•i+'-'~•!.
~~'~}aa''7~!`~r f r'lY~r •L' l:~r 1•'i ~!w ` 1Y...
r; ti I A 1, ~;:J' tr• d • ~M
+ ` r~rrr~+l . t L 1 f f ' J, i~ ' ±~r. `l. , F
' ~~,w^.t+ ~u / ~ S ~~'r ` ' ~ ~ ~ ~ f.~ ^3`{~F~~'l r ± i 1 4 j~ 'Ii> I r '
_(IJ`4yny'• .~ul~l Q 'ei~,r, 1~I 4~I I ~'Y•~' r'
• ~ r i , ~ ri . ~ 'ti„ J,r~l~l~,-d r~ • ~11' + r , ' ~1~ a'1 it 'r
• , t~,`,,' .~L I J(y' •"~1~R ~„~J{x4 art v,. •,r,;, ~e,~~. r,
Jl .lai'r.. It It, ~ ' r.M >,ir 'I. 'r ' Sy w'~'1 '''.r'.yr ~4v~,,,tlYr. ~~T 1}.' t~IriY'jMMr143►~+Mi
rf1 Z
J
Tv;F
yi I1 y■~l~ r qrp F { ],t_y r~. r k I~.t,'yY x 'Ai~~.Ir,~'• Mf +
t ISCM1' .°y ~•/II: ` 1,. .~v,fi.,~~r ~f1~ ,t ;Tr 'Y ,'►,v'•• r, +'y~ -
•r41•~ra II~`• I I ' 1'J••Y+ i`1r '.k♦yy1•le7f f ' ,y, f, r~ iy ~~yJ{f.~, :,1~AVJ 7tt•t1 A~1 yyr J+
Rtrt .t , / / I rr i .~}x`17/.~f1 '}.Sr+J r~ J sit.
+rY d. ? • , , ~J v "f l fa L~.~))7~rf'1, ~ 1*.•r 1.•r~r 7•Ir ,
Ir, •~i,., r,i'Yt,rrify;',~Yrfw if M ,.4..i S 1f.i 1 ; +
; 1 J rr '^M'i#t 1 J K `•t.. t t{~ I •p' v III
r' r y r. ~q"M
''i° ~r 1, f ~v • yS hs l•,'It~l a!' +tlitr••i:4 Srta1 r Jf i p . + r s°
{{.'•.q~~# R ~ i~~ M S5 `j aL f ~~tlISf`tt,~~,YI..~}```{J,~1~x', + r r I r r• tf r •r~~.;}+L• ;~yya
Ir t{9 1.j • Ij•~'I~i{'fTY'4~R'Jr 5..;;!Z7r{Y'~r''4t+~a•y+}.)?4'y,••,.•S'',{}w'.~g
t ts„~erE
!Y r~"r1V~.k '~yl ~,rr (.tr'r•1•,5 ,;'S'y`~'t f!' }~,,:1 r'tir~ v. J,~ 4-t !.•c.{I
1 i 1 r " , I.`.h` aF 1 t,N 4M 3 r f., , a K ;T , ni
y t ,1 J., 'p 5,• I •'•Y.j .,{J. TI~.i1
M~ r Kr r'✓ I.:d♦ ham,. ryv r,. • / , *I, yi4 ,t! s
/ i I 4
!r j, 1~,'~ rrLar f,r i ),I 1.1~,y ~~Yfl ~}~Ir I rl~ q, I. ffol 'e rly rYV •L 1t ~ e~_ nr ri rL~7.f1
l {►~r~, ~A'(,''♦LJ~f~+~~`Y~>'„S•'a .ii y.~Y,M'l• .~~'`!'l}"y.i.~.l... 4i LI,SY f°"~' + ,
1~7 Q. ;t, 1 .y~ r r ryd V il* r J I' 1 ° 1 anf i
~,..3~in 4~~~ i ttom'. ~L ,k . ^~os 61 - 1., .,~,Jt', .I~'~~ R.y r dlr., ih'. 4 rt j"r , ~:~Jf7~.1'j.
44, .•~i r li,~ r. it f."L ~ I~,l t J 1 ,'t *-;~l tfi
IF
w t c i~xx LF
t . r 3
L t F~ lA-,I~J, '.~ry:ir -.ai., ~ ~ .,:,~,~r ,r "I;t• 1J', r
yi 1 z4 ~i
~,r • Ifl irSn `~bL,,,~~r4 a,,, ~a''',na,4 ter {{r. r. ~ a. ~r j a f ~.~f,y
ltl~4SY4:t,{'f1A. lt•♦~XJ..l4{flX7 ~+G}~'rV ~!-.S L. A,;l tk§•~(., r.t~k"l 4.r, ~f ~i ;IW~'f r24?,. IMF aI~~"S,~le ~f''I /'i
i
pal .
I
Deemeber 2, 1984
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITM 1
i
SUHJECTs
Approval of Endorsement of Proposed Legislation to Allow
Municipal Electric Systems to Serve All Areas Within Their
City Limits,
SUMMARYI
Several cities in Texas who own their electric systems have
come to realize in the past two years that they are being
denied, by the Public Utility Commission, the right to serve
electricity to newly annexed areas of their cities. Theme
are cities who failed to obtain Certificates of Convenience
and Necessity (i,e „ certification to serve the area) from ,
the -PUCin 1976, When the PUC was created in 1975, these
oitiba did not believe that the State or PUC through' the
Public Utilities. Regulatory Act could usurp all previbue
franchise and other utilityy service laws and deny a' oitp the right to serve its own oitisens, Therefore, some of these
cities did not file` for certificates to serve In their extra ' R!
territorial jurisdiction areas as Denton did, and they. now
find that the only area that the PUC will allow them to serve'
it that area which represented their city limito in 1976,
Although Denton is not, immediatell.r affected by this issue,
sometime in the future, Denton will be faced with the same
situation. ,
The attached legislation, proposed by the Texas Public Power I
Association, is aimed at rectifying this inequity, Also
attached is a PUC order toe the City of Grandbury,' dated July
1979, regarding the POC'e actions in this area,
FISCAL SUMMAAYI
Not applicable
N ACTION RROUIRE01
k~. Endorsement by the City of Denton In support of the subject
legislation,
w}
t
d i
I t~
ahrr ~ y':
lid,
N
i ~
ALTEPNATI VES I
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Public Utilities Hoard, at their meeting of November 250
1980, recommended to the City council endorsement of subject
legislation, k
Respectfully, j
R° E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
1(
I;
r i
I°
EXHIBIT I Letter from TP►A dated September 161 1980 w
II Legislation
III PUC Order of July 11, 1979 ;
I
WI ' J
I
I 1w,
a15T3r' • ~ :iF~
+
. gg IW " ,
+w I
l
KZ~'
Pay t`
3
~t
r
ti,
1. '
e.~..e.i
y / TEXAS PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
' 1, ► 510 /n too. Sukf 507 • Au,tln, Tao178701 •5121477.2051
!
.T~e • t l
September 16, 1980
A 1
Mr. Robert E. Nelson
Director
DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES i ;
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Nelsons
The Texas Public Power Association will initiate legislitien'
in January to allow municipally owned utilities to provide electrical
service within their city limits without the necessity of obtaining ,r
a certificate of convenience and necessity. Attached, please find a
j copy of the bill we intend to introduce.
Although the Public Utility Commission recently ruled for the first j
.t time in favor of a city owned utility allowitlg an amended cartificate,
legislative change is imperative to clear up any ambiguity and to prevent
an expensive and lengthy hearing process.
Endorsement of the atteched bill by your city council at a public
meeting would be s good way to create favorable publicity for our goal.
When you are able to agenda the item and have it passed, would you
s, please contact our Austin office*
Sincerely,
ichael Simmons 1
Executive Director
RMS/11
Attachment
C1 rye,
~ I t
r
Y 1
d
A SILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the right of municipally owned and municipally franchised
retail public utilities to provide service to an area within the city
limits.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE 0? TEXASi
SECTION 1, SECTION 510 Public Utility Regulatory Act (Article
1446c, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), is amended by adding Subsection
(c) to read as followat k
Vi municipally, owned
"(c) Notwithstanding any other prwia ens of IS
retail public utilities and other reteil public utilitiea'duly franchised
-by the governing body to serve within the municipal limits may Idt'AiW,
make available$ render, or extend retail public utility service to any
area that is within the municipal limits Without securing a certllicite'
of public convenience and necessity," {
SECT16H 2, The importance of this legislation and the crowded condition
of the calendar in both homy creates an emergency and an imperative public
necessity that the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three -
days in each house be st+apended and this rule is hereby suspended.
i
t.
i
s
i
,3
r,
ORDER
In p,hllc Tattlnl at its effices in Austin. Ttass, tha Puallc UN lily COrr+lsslcn of
Texas finds that tea a%o O.-%ylea appllcatlon was procassts in w-rd:nce with aPplfcabla
statutea by an ftaiiner who prtosrad and filed a Report containing Findings OF Fact and
Conclusions of law, which EASSInar's Aeport is adopted and Bade a part hereof. Tha
Corvnission furthar issues the following ORDERt
The applftation of Grant»ry Manlcipil Utilities to emend its Certiffcara Of
Convenience oral rrtesslty (Cartiflcate 110. 30010) is wday C01ED.
} RE40ERED AT A71TI4, TEXAS, en the 11th day of July , 1979.
WIST: PUOLIC UTILtTY CCVjIS51ON Of TEAAS
1 PHILIP F. RICYETTS GEORGE M. LO40
SEC;!IAAY ^,F THE "Oe; lSSIOA GAAAETT MORRIS
1
I
i
APPLICATION Of ORAA3L'RY MU'IICIPAL
UTILITIES TO A1101 ITS CERTIFICATE I DOCKET h0. 1709
OF C031(11 ENCE A,N) NECESSITf 4THIN
H000 COU4tY
{
ttAMINER'S R£POAT '
Procedural History l '
on March 6, 1979, Cranbury Munie(pal Utilities (EMI)) filed an opplicatfoe tovtnl
Its Certlfieete of Coavtnien 4 and Neee bity, certificate No. )VIO, to i ovida riti
nostril Qt IIIty Seel Iof II Hood County, Johnson Ynunty (Iertrlc Coopers%Iof Car it IIICit$ ~ i
No. 30092, (JCEC) filed A letter protestfn4 the proposed azlndxant and on Soptenber.it,
1916, filed Its formal notion to intervene In this docket, A prehelrlny conference w11 I r
held October No 1076, after which this ease was ConsoN sited i,ith Docket 1107 for "
pp`rposes of hursnop one , shiNo other Protests, mollone to lntieve! e, or requests fora a
A'arin hoof bola f i1N n t matter. the netrfnt 'on the mertil herein was hold Janulfy "
24 1019, Alan Holeah fesidlhg. Appaarandes wore math by attorneys Ralph wilton far Vi,
Lb, St. Clair for JLp(C, end Mike Ifinchard for the Commission's General Ctunsel and ;
Staff, The below signal Itailner has read the record Mreln, upon which this report is
I r `
bated.
v
Oy( WI
VJ if Inkfr dual certification to in area adjacent to the praaint city limlts,of
eragv( in which ~ICIC Is Moot Iingly Certificated, Oranbufy is preparlig to lanes the eras
In quotfen, lasiaally, GVI theory if that It is entitled is a C•rti(Ititi' to stref any
eras, within its City bour,dar'u . 0W has privioutty aesortid this ratlorilo before tha
f Grin ur Docket 661, 3 PUC lull 936 (101A)(Icanitnlr'f report)
Caamlislon, fl.ty
d t 1 PUt lu . 03). in Now 688, Gran)ury was annesin the South Town
u v v lion and one other still parcel of land Idlacent to itt h n ails ny cit? limits,
the vendwint to its Wk ificste was granted by tea Ccrmisilon, wi Fna"tAim1n,r I Report
in Dock t all relyinp on and siting en eafllif CortAISSian s1•.,e rim 1 r Sewer
ee 'oaket its 1 he Iu11,211 (1016)(1 Mae'% raporls u l
, . )(findings and Condfueionl only, addopted).. In Odckrt 1 , a f the tpieiflc
feuli id011141 WAS whether or not 1 city, havfn annexed in fees alriady i rand u
another electric utility, sho-,id is a rtt• rf ee1~j~ ~a out11 y clrtlNcstil with the
talll!yy ldshl.arnl~_ a+nered fell, At wil deetdaa that t Cl~y'WAV VITU-114 10 of 54
elrtiflCated In ofcer tic I n~g1t/ dal eitiaant fKquastln7 servile wftlln 1te ell
11e1t 9peavlf, t r xlatno c s• p. iE"a + v r
diA1 oc a 103, lira to to .,IStingulthed frva the install ease. In those pOde tell.
Ir d ' in Contras:,
the Conanilslon ranted eltlas LIrtNlGtrf to terue arias Vii
tins C f n a In list < ill t!Y Lalus^2.14 ! n o1 +„del~Bls .sn
kid t rl• r If , hrrh am area ha hat
~y~o r nwi y, Oocket 9, u
x P a por,ee~ a u u C, 1916) (findfags Ind toneluil.M only
adopted) wherein s',e L ty of Robstawn was Cealod Certlf1. W.1on to CerLiln riluestat
tefvlee $Post wlthtn Its W.rstorritorial furisdittiun,
Thui, thls till to to a vidvad In the posher-a e! Any otter Ili cfetlfieatloa dispute S
} larolrlno w roqunst far 6111 certificitlOn, with the bvrQen f311fn ae,thf ftY 1..shat
j ti ' t_aaa1.31tif1saltn~w-.1i Jis_i1L,tha,DLt: lnla~Ut;" a I 9 >0i" ctrl4
Casket $11, 3 PVC 6411,85J, Iii (1013)(tessie w s rrppor ag A tC
FiTL iT19r31(f1milegs and conclutians Only adcp•ai) !f~'d 0_11y 0 ~Orc3n ri11i
r Ilc !ttltityCr~alsal n, Cie. Na. 114,934, Oist,Ct. of TNvts ~ou~~sFFy,~iTr3`.udri`,rr ! i
' Gait. M-Texts, ."T/ l1, 113. J
, I 14Qi3
Vet'
{
1 ~
i•
w~..y
1 fa'tdrs to be eolai•_r20 here with regard td the S' I1: + n'° all .•:P
are: (1) whether or not the colsting utility which is s+`1ta 2d W -.-.0 area is read!. .
willing, and able to serve 0a area, POA S531a); (2) A`•. e' eta ele-, I a i
e>pllcant-utility and the utility presently servlrg t? i V13 a-3 cJ ~.!It' S: ;
(3) whether the Qjslity of service of each of the parties +3 t,1ear3J16, i+ S53(ci; ~4'
whether or not the resultant duplitatldn of facilities, t' ::a cart:ft:atlon results, 1;
In the public interest; and (5) other statutory factors lilt], in TEs,RE4'. :tV.S W .r,.'i.'i.
art. 14361, S54(c) (Vernon Supp. 1973) (PC'RA).
The nirrr'A question before the Co-.nission ther. IS whet'!r at not 6119 his carried Its
burden with respect to public convenience and necetsity. The disputed area Is Mt
presently developed, but the owner of the land plans to subdivide the area into
approxlmately two hundred lots. There is evidence in the record that both parties to this
case have electric lines wAlch are near or adlicent to the area in question. Both parties
testffiad that they are ready, willing, and We to larva the area in question, JCEC
produced eJldemee to show that the rates of the two csepalies are cimpetttive, with the
rates of JCEC being slightly lower. Both parties purchase their electricity from Brazos ,
Electric Power Cooperative. G'td attempted to show that JCEC had quality of service
problems. However, basal on the record as a whole, the W.-Aver tlnds nothtng to indicate
that J:EC provides inadequate service to its present custa-,ers or would provide inadequate
service to the disputed area. &'41 did nest provide any persuasive evidence that its quality
of settles is superior to that or JCEC's.
There was testimony to the effect that if d rt f ation were granted, duplicated
facilities would result, leading to ;itgR! Pa` Lax.' Its, th"augh underground facilities
are Planned for the area, the transformer fads still hiva to to on the surface and dual
certification would require twice as many pads to serve the as.ae detarea than 1f the area wars
hatiC_
singly certificated. PURR 655(a)- Suth' s1 ht Dllutl a I .re n to a est
values, PUU 954(c) and not to h
1
According to 6.4Uis profiled d!rect testimony and certain testimony WOW at the
hearing on the marits, VIU uses electric utility revenuts to help finance other city
operations. Since Granb'Jry is planning to annex the area, it alleges it will need electric 1 .
revrnuas frail Customers In the area to finance city apirit!ons.i nheh.6n~aed area. Lf~
a' is
• tv t bar Inns it
TNt chdosat t nancr Its t °r 'Ions In Oil 11ft th
"`2oLfLraDN lt
a t t•' n it I
0"-wives n s t a o nanring shoo d_rlst~
way into sear n areas D lnnete~ withoJt a furtha ,.h:a n of pub c canvs_ n _ience an I
The Staff maintained the un that- dertifi_te3tion sho-ild not be ranted fll`
car concurs wish one Self i
enumerated auove. Tne .43 11
rely'n~ nr-the-nMifrors Itr ac 01
C, position.
GMJ was unable to present any other compelling evidence that dual eertiflcatfon on
the facts of this case would be in the public interest. W43 hats thus failed to carry its i
Ilv len on the Issue of dual certification. See Transcript of Final Order Nearing, July 24,
3973, at 92.96. f
the City in one of the maps admitted in evidence, : Ry Exhibit 1, Attachment 'AN,
Indicated where Its present transmission 110t are. One of those lines serves a dually
certificated enclave within the contested area, which was dually tertlflcated to Docket
633. However, this line crosses an area which is singly tirtificsted at present to JCEC.
YO r,'and'rent was granted by the remission which allowed O'"1 to run this transmission lire
across the singly certificated area to JCEC. Althou)h tee tarelas do not seea in dispute
on this point, it is still an uncertificated line intruding u?on JCE6's singly
eertlfieatel sees. This tine is within the area rbq'ws:ed to be duo ly certificated by
G*J. The ;ins, is sho.n an red on Exhibit NA• attschai htfa.D, sh~'uld be ccetifiested to
VU, but to transmission only status. PURA W(D). In the fJt'Jre, If G4J intends to run
lines to or, area which is dJally certificated to and rant cross singly certif+cated areal,
it should come to the Coirltssloa for in aaenlmant or wi~ ti.n tefora it proceeds to
establish such !Ines.
The Wilmer rac:rmeals that this Examiner's Report to iiiatil by the Conmissto ,
Including tee following findings of fact, Conclusions of tsA, all itt3chrd Crderl
Findinms-of Fact
1. Gellbury MintclpaI Uttlttiet fia'd an application to Vend Its
Certificate of Convinlence and Necatsity td pr:vf:a eat- w c retail
utility service aithln Hood County,
2. The area in quofticn with the eiception of tai s'IIi portion is
presently singly c i r t l f i : a t i l to Johnson rrJnty E oar a r7operfelra.
E
3. Johnson COUnty Is ready, wilting, and W o '.l tern'e the area in
Question.
4. 11e electric rar .ef of r County are t.++ar. r !^i, ,rsrovrY'a.
i Jo4.non
S. These are no f3clli-ies In the area !.Sept far 6aar:.,y : Tina s'rvi•,g
the dually eertifl;JteJ enclave cotaired f3 :ass! iii.
` 1494
ic iota not pressing dually
6. Dual tt eon in the requested
certificcaated ed 1 i5 s not in the pUDilc CO convenienc nce and necessity.
7. The financial structure of a city not e factor indecidirg whether
It is entitled to dial certification in a particular area.
i.
j, Conclusions of Law
p 1. The Commission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to
1 TEA.AEY.CSY.STAT.AYY. art. 1446e, 9916, 19.62 (Vernon Supp. 1976)
(PUAA).
2. In a contested case where a utility is requesting dual certification
to am area s ImIlly the requesti ng utility is to proventhatrdualliccrtlficattonnIn $ the
requKted area is within the public Convenience and necessity.
J~`}
3. Cranbury has failed to discharge Its burden of proof that dual
certification to the contested erei which is singly certificated is
rich the public convenience and necessity.
e. PURA 5511(b) Woos the Commistion to Issue on a portion of the
certificate aT,tn.-ant requested by an applicant.
ln red on map Ehibite Aeto td necessity to ransmission limaronly sate the
S. time Is shown within
tatus.
y
: Respectfully submitted,
PHILIP F. RICKETTS FREDEAIC M. HCLFRAM
OIR£C1OR of HEARINSS HEARINGS EtARINER
APPAOYEo on the day of Me, 1979. '
y ;
ORDER
In public meeting at its offices In Austin, Tells, the Public Utility Commissloe of 11
Texas finds that the abore•stylei application was processed in accordance with aP9llcable
statutes by An Wilmer who ofa:ared and filed a Report conta?ning findings of fact and
k Conclusions of Law, which Eunineels Report is adopted and eade a psrt hlraofm the
Comafssion further 1114es the fotla«inq GADERi
The application of Grineufy Municifal Utilities to amend its Certiffcate of f .
Coll venie nee and Necessity (Cert ficate No. 10070) is denied with the
exception of the telnsmIssian tine as shovm in red on map Exhibit "A' which t
Is granted transmission line ttitus only.
AENDEW AT AUSTie, WAS, on the UtAtn III of July ,1974.
ATTESTt PUBLIC UTILITI COMMISSION OF TEXAS
i
FHILtP F. RICKETTS GEORGE M. C64Eh '
SECAETART OF THE COMHISSIO'M GARAM MORRIS
t
f
2000
it
December 2, 1080
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #
1
SUBJECT:
Approval of Charge Orders Relative to the Wastewater
Treatment Plant Expansion Project.
SUMMARYs
A number of change orders have been received from Gracon ,
Construction Company. These change orders include the *r
following:
' 1. Install two additional floor drains with a vent' and '
c eanout In the um room o the over u ni
These rains were shown in the structural raw n s but
,
were excluded from the plumbing plans which ~ the
mechanical subcontractor based his bid on. The total
addition to the contract will be $1,080.
2. Delete Decant Pump Station and Add Decant 'Drain
syst__e_mr originally, the plans ca a or a ecant pump
ataton to pump water from the drying beds to the ;
Plant's storm crater line ~
. Shortly 'after cbnstruetion
j;
began, it was discovered that a •.iravitp :flow drain. t,r
system could replace the need for the
pump station', and
return decant' water back to the head of the. Flant..
However, State regulations require that;return.flov bs
metered and thus the addition of a zaetering`Elm-i 4111
be necessary. Credit is being offered for khe deletion
of the decant pump station, but the decant drain sp'stem
p will exceed the credit necessitating an addition to the
contract of $600.
3. Watersto at Primar Clarifiers: Waterstop !s used, to
stop water seepage etween Re concrete poured joints.
The waterstop was simply omitted from the structural
drawings. The total addition to the contract will be
~ 6 521,
,
j 4. Pipe and Valve change at Floatation Thickener
Pressur xat on S stems This can9e is necoss to e
the equ pment manufacturer who has requestod the change
In order to line up the piping and valves to fit'h~s
equipment. The total addition to the contract will be
$350.
I
i
i {
t
f
t
Owl
The Consulting Engineers, Freese and Nichols, inc., have
viewed both the need and cost proposals for these change
r
orders and have recommended they be approved.
{
FISCAL SUMMARY s
Total of all change orders $ 8,551 i
Source of Funds:
y Grant Contingency Fund 6,413
($7860270 in this fund) $
a City of Denton Sewer Bonds 2 138
TOTAL-`51
*The source of funds identified above is contingent upon receiving
Texas Department of Water Resources approval on subject change
orders. Otherwise, the total cost of $ 8,551 will be funded by
Sever Bond Funds.
.
ACTION REQUIRED!
Approve, disapprove or modify subject change orders.
RECOMMENDATION!
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of November 25,
1980, recommended to the `City Council that the change orders
be approved in the amount of $ 80551.
{ Respectfully,
r
R, E. Nelson i
Director of Utilities
,
ELHIBIT I Gracon Construction Co, Letter of il/31/80
it aracon Construction Co. Letter of 11/14/80
6
f
i
,
I "
,
.....rat 4ayrk
,
II
~QbFio►-,tir
a !
{
j
GRACON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
3201 HIGHWAY 67. SUITE F . MESQUITE, TEXAS 75150 0 (21141270-7190
i
November 13, 1980
Freese and Nichols, Inc. i
811 Lamar Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76102
r,
Attn: Elvin Copeland Res Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
Denton, Texas
Gentlemen:
1
We have received a field directive to install two additional floor
drains with-a vent and cleanout to be located in the pump room of the
blower building north of the floor drain system as shown on drawing
M-4 sequence 107.
We have been informed by our mechanical subcontractor that the cost
for this additional system will be as follows!
Pipe and Drains $450.00
Labor $400.00
-Field Burden. $ 90.00
Overhead 6 Profit 140.00
Total Add to Contract $1,080.00
Please let us know immediately if tyis is acceptable so we may proceed F
with this work
Very truly yours,
,
CRACON LONSTRUCTION COMPWY, INC.
j
BY i~ YwLO/p.2+.~
Jades Kern r
Project Manager
j JK/se
l
I
i
i
GRACON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC,
I G 3201 HiG8wAY 67, SwT[ F • MESourr[, UXAS 7S150 (2141 270.7130
1 ' 1rpY/
November 14, 1980
Freese and Nicholso Inc.
811 Lamar Street
Ft. Worth, Texas 76102 '
} Attnt Elvin Copeland Res Wastewater Treatment Plant txpanaion
Denton, Texas
Centlemens
We have completed our estimates for the following
orders for your review. Prcposed change
1. Delete Decant Pump Station and Addition of Decant
Drain System
Credits Concrete $1,480.00 {
Rebar 430.00
Pipe 1,600.00
valves 11200.00
Pumps 7,260.00
Electrical 10250.00.
Labor S A60.00
Field Burden 10870.00
O.N.P. 31080.00
Total Credit ($236630.00)
Adds Concrete $350.00
Rebar 100.00
Misc. Metal 100.00
Pipa 4,800.00
Manhole 16200.00
Electrical d Iustru. 80100.00
Labor 41500.00
j Field Burden 1,920.00
O.R.P. 3,160.00 t
Total Costs $241130.00_
TOtAl Add to Contract $600.00
i
,
i
~ j
,J
s ;
=d -
• ✓
O v November 14, 1980
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Re: Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion I
Denton, Texas
Page 2
xrtxee 2. Basin Drain System and Storm Water Line Modification
Credit: Concrete $1000.00
Rebar 140.00 ; j
Dewatering Pump 13500.00 1
Labor 1$00.00
Field Burden 410.00
O.H.P. 650.00
Total Credit ($50200.00)
r` Add: Concrete $700.00
r Rebar 400.00
misc. Metal 100.00
D.I. Pipe 3,000.00
R.C. Pipe 31000100
Conc. Cradle 6 Bedding 110700.00 I
Manholes 51506.00 i
Valves 21500.00
Electrical A Inscru. 81100,00
Labor 25,000.00
Field Burden 9,400.00 i
O.H.P. 15,300.00 I
Total Cost 1186706.00
Total Add to Contract $1130500.00 i ,
3. Waterstop at Primary Clarifiers: f
Ad
di PVC, Waterstop $1,006.00 }
Joint Sealer 1,390.00
Labor 20115.00
Field Burden 518.00
01H.P4 658.00
Total Add to Contract $6,521.00 E
4. P
Pressurization Change at Flotation Thickener
System (Reference our letter of 9-25-80)
Addt Valve $160.00
Pipe 40.00
Labor 50.00
Field Burden 30.00 I
O.H.P. 50.00
Total Add to Contract _ $350.00
Wt -INCLU)~D IN THIS REQUEST-PRESENTLY LNMR CONSIDERATION
V STAFF
r I
.,_~w~-. L-0. I
i
November 140 1980
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
Res Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
I Denton, Texas
Page 3
1 We propose to use `a precast top in lieu of the cone shown on the
decant metering manhole, metering manhole and. manhole No.4 as an
eccentric cone of this diameter is not made. We also propose to
use a joint sealer in lieu of waterstop on the primary clarifiers '
as per the attached sketch.
l If you have any questions regarding these proposals please contact us, s f
Very truly yours,
GRACON CONSTRUCTION CMIPANYj INC.
Hy '/~c~,..1
J as Kern
Project Manager
A/se
Enclosure
t
{
i
r
j
I
1
r
CITY OF DENTON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST FORM
DATE Of CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 9. 1980
ITEM TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA:
y-
1. Approval of the renewal of the Public Official Liability Insurance pol°.cy
r for the City of Denton by Unimark-McDonald, Inc. `
2. Letter and invoice from Unimark-McDonald, Inc. In the amount of $5,746.00.
3. No preference.
4 r.. '
q
,•r
-
Aid
°l
dOl"
A:..TrP1_NcY'.tipw2"f'rer.yM`rH3Tsr'rVY'n4e.:,;v....,
f CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
i
MEETING DATE: December 9, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM f
t" SUBJECT: Approval of the renewal of the Public Official Liability Insurance
policy for the City of Denton by Unimark-McDonald, Inc.
SUMMARY: Approval of this policy will keep our Public Official Liability Insurance
in force. The amount to renew from 1-1-81 to 1-1-82 is $SJ46.00, E.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the renewal of this policy. ,
ALTERNATIVES; 1. Approval of the renewal of this policy.
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Department budgets.
RECOMMENDATION: The Risk Manager, John G. Maxwell, recavends this policy be
y
renewed.
EXHIBIT: I. Invoice from Unimark-McDonald, Inc.
11. Letter from Unimark-McDonald, Inc.
i
I
k
rc'
i
,fI
i
2525 N. swmmona F hry,
P.O. eo° x Ale f
WK Two 7 0233
+ (21(6361010 y
Te■aa WAYS: 60(Mt; )522 '
Nallonal WATe; 600.527-9402 _
ti
%
November 11, 1980
W., John V. Maxwell
Risk Manager
Municipal Building
Denton, TX Wol
•
REr Public Official Liability Insurance Rcnewal
Dear Mr. Maxwells
%
We "are pleased to announce that we will be able to provide
another'yecc'of,coverage under the Public official Liability
Insurance x)Licy for the City of Denton, Texas.
-Attached please find an InvoicIe which refle is the cost of
the inturance for the coming year. You will bVi pleased: to know
that the rates have not increased. ',However; the premium does
reflect an increase due to population growth in your locality.
NOV 171W
''`lLet us emphaslse that the Reroblic group of companies and
our reinsurance underwriters are solidly behind this program.
Thank you for your participation in the past, and we look forward
to being of,service to you in, the future.
Sincerelyll, 6> j
j Charles T. Terrell
Chairman of the Board E
Enclosure
cca 'Mr. Keith Steed
i
Providing Unique Insuracce Programs For Unique Insurance Needs
e M
I
U11' 11IA1 - MC DONRYaI?, INC
E '
WS K Wool" FF".
G a on um
DATE i o November 11#,1980 3 [ r1+ TMI sues
trnneuow It ' .
To Mr. John G. Maxi.011 ` + s
T'. Risk Manager Municipal Suildinq ;
s i
ff Denton,.TX 76201
1 t o F
OAYt COMPANY rOUCY x CMAROES CR[DrT AAtANCt !
11-11-80 Vanguard Underwriters insuzince Company
` i
Public OM612kl Liability Insurance $5,221.00 -0- $5,221.00
Fire Chief 'Endor6umeht 525.00 -0 525.00 e''..
.AO r
Police Chief Endorsement 515.90 -0 53i
Total Due $61271,00
(1-8-81 to 1-8-82) ,
If Additional Endorsement to desireds
. ~ ~
r
Municipal ,
1 6 Governmental Employees Endorsement 5??s-}9 -0 59SYi0
Totai Amount Due $6,793.10
+ 'r'1-F 91 to 1-8-82)
-FAt MlUM• A 4 but ANO PAYABLE ON THE DA19 rOWCItt YAAt i:If[CT 1+ 1
I
1
4
r
I
I
C111 COUNCIL AGENDA
SUMMARY SHEET
j Meeting Datat December 21 1980
j
Council Agenda Item
Subjsets lid 18829 Pad Mounted Switch Gear
S ari4 This bid to for the purchase of Switch gear to
be used in tha City Electric Distiibutla system.
We received eight bids after baing'asnt to twelve
vendors. This type switch is bid periodically and
purchased to have in inventory for use as needed.
Action Required: Approval of low bid as recommandad.
Alternatives: none
Source of Funds: Inventory or capital improvement budgeted funds
45.98-87-08 or 02-52-92-21.
Recovesadations We recom eM this bid be awsrded to the low
evaluated bid msetitS specifioations Priastsr
Supply Co, of Ariiagton for the ATE switch at
$3,631.60 each for the total of $360310.00,
Exhibits Tabulation shoat
Submitted bye John J. FArshall, C.P.N. {
Purchasing Agent
E I
i
.z I
111 4
r
4
a+ ,
f. ,1 I
ell
{
i
1
DID 8929
DID Pad Mounted Switch Gears Cummins Nelson Poleline Prlester Priester Temple Temple Trayer
OPEN 2 pm, Nov. 11, 1980 Supply Electric Elect. Supply Supply inc. Inc. Engineer
Supply RTE A.B. Chanc Corp.
ACCOUNT 1 02-52-92-21 Co., Inc.
D
VENDOR QTY- ITEM DESCRIPTION---VENDO E
3
1. 10 Switch Cear 40911 .00 49915.58 :.',1.00 3,631,00 8,088.00 4,770.00 4,840.00 7.00.00
Kearney S 6 C Chant XTE Chance S 6 C Kearney 'prayer
I
Delivery 112 days 98 days 112 days 84-98 day 98-114 98 days 140 dry 112-140~
Am-
Terms N 30 1/21 %10 a
N 30 N 30 N 30 N 30 N 30 N 30 Net 30
1
S
.
111
l
f
y .
1
yM. • )tlby ya
j r• We
1
~I F
1
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
a
{
DATE OF MEETING: December 2, 1980
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 1s
SUBJECT: Bid /8832 Truck Cab b Chassis with Refuse Body
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of two rear lcadiAg
type refuse trucks. These two units vi-11 replace ;
three older obsolete refuse trucks, Unite number
11740, 1860, and 1940. The rear loading units era
risld for special pickup such as brush, refrigerators. !I
furniture and other bulky type items and as a back
up for the larger more expensive side loader type
{ trucks.
I Ploase note on the tabulation sheet there vas some
confusion on the transmission for there trucks.
The ATS45 (4 speed) in the iranenissioa morawlly
used in this site truck hovever, the transmission
manufacturer will not warranty the Ar545 when used
under a dump' body or refuse body, Allison, Inc.
the transmission manufacture recommends the MT643
(5 speed) for refuse trucks.
ACTION REQUIREDs Approval by council and award of bid.
ALTEMATIVESs None.
SOURCE OF FUNDS: The funds for this purchase will c6s, ftois'two
h accounts. Motor Pool rapiacenset will fund ,
829,887.31 from account numbir 06-bo-87-011 solid {
Waste residential dept. will fund t6 balitnce of
$28,562.69 from account number-68-01-91-040 The
total price for the units is $58,450.00.
RECOHNENDATIONSs We recossoand the low bid of E
nvironmeatelIMee sad
Service it $17,925.00 each for the MC tsuAs vi'th -
f the Allison MT443 transmission and,aLo the rear
loading refuse,bodies at $11,300.00 each, The low
bid includes the mounting of the body and delivery
of the complete unit to the City of Denton at !
$29,225.60 each, total cost $58,450.00, FOB Denton, '
Delivery its 60 to 90 days.
E14i1MiISs Tabulation sheet.
SUBMITTED BYt
Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. {
Aas't. Purchasing Agent
lc
.
i
1-4
,
BID I s57f
BID Truck 6 Setues Bodx Pak-Nor Davis I.D.S. Enoiroa'2 Enviroo'l I.M. Co. I.N. Co. haney sill
Co. Truck Sales L Sales 6 Dallas Dallas 10C ► Utter
OPEN 11116!80 See. Ser. Il 12 Ford
21 12
ACCOUNT' 4 '
ITM DESCRIPTION VBHDOR VENDOR VENDOR IVENVOR VENDOR VZHDOR VENDOR VENDOR fZWOOR
i
1. 2 Truck cah 6 chassis 17,52740 21,141. 19,208.88 16,673.00 17,925.00 17,!27.90 19,204.90 0,515.00
We INC Ford INC INC CMC INC INC INC Foci
Transmission A1543 ee MT653 MT643 AT545 i1 W643 AT543 ea NT643 A7545 M MT643
2. 2 Best loading refuse body 11,300.00 11,383. 12,383.00 11,300.00 11,300.00 !,365.00 12,385.00 -56 TOTAL 29,02. 0 3 ,52 . x393.6
27,9 3.00 29,125.55 Z9,912.90 1, 3,
Delivery 9D-120daya 60-90 d&y 00-90dsys 90-1Ways 120days 60 days
!atom of psynent get 30 Net 30 It i0 day Net Net der Not 120 of f
Am The AT34 traas lss o' has 1 6idd n#
body en dump y, The teens- o tojat r
mission manufacturer recoeses der
r
1
f
i
i
i
i
.
i
i
I
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SUMHAAY SHEET
` Meeting Dates December 2, 1980
Council Aganda Item 1:'
SubjactI Bid 08833 Volumetric Chemical Feeder
Summarys This unit is for the addition of potassium
rmanfmate in the treatmeit of water used
•
to make
by the City of Denton. It is necessary
b
fff sure the designated amount of chemical needed
~e
used.
is
Action Aequiredi Approval of low bid.
Y'
Alternatives s none
source of Fundas Budgeted account 004-60-91-13
Eacvmeodatiom we recoamend this bid be awarded to the evaluated I'
low bidder meeting specifications Wallace 6 Tiarmw
at $4,545.00 net aith delivery in 60 days.
Exhibits tabulation sheet. j j
r Submitted byl John J. Marshall, C.7.14` j
Purchasing Agent
~ r
{
i
i
i
1
DID 1 8833
DID Volumetric Feeder
OPEN 11-20-80 Joe Aquaftne Bir Wallace 6
Cobler Chemical Tierman
ACCOUNT 1 b Equip.
T
wit
1 . Volumetric Feeder 4,701.00 N/8 7,180.00 4045.00 _ W
1
Deliver -
1 j 40 days 80 days 80 days
Term Net. 30 Net. 30 Not. 30
!O6 Denton Denton Denton
+ I
I
I
I
{Y~MiY.Mn.wn.-~..__... .._..-...w~rM.W~gAw~.r•.+P r.......... f
R
r W
t
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SUMMARY SHIST
Meeting Dew December 20 1980
Council Agenda Item 4s
Subjects Did 18634, Fire Dept. Unitorme
I
Summarys This bid is for the purchase of.new dress uniform
for the Fire Department Personnel. Some are to to- 1
place existing uniforms and others for now personnel.
The quantities are determined by the need and will be
ordered by size and packaged for each individual person.
Action Requirede Approval of low bid, meeting specifications as re
commendcd.
Altarastivess None
Source of luridsi Budget
Recommendations We recommend this bid be avarid to the low bidder '
meeting specifications for each item",, Items 1020
30 And 4 to, Kaufman Uniforms of San Antonio and
Items 5 and 6 to Cravens Department Store of Denton t'
for the total purchase price of ¢9,146.35.
6xhibitat Tabulation Sheet
Submitted bye John J. Marshall, C.p,M.+
Purchasing Agent ;
+ f
i,
j
{
i
3
f
f
T bra
i ~
DID # 8834
Uniforms Ladd Factory J.B. Batt a Doaavan Cravens Kaufman Low
BID Fire Dept. Uniform Sales Uniform Uniform Uniform Bid
Co. Co. Totals
OPEN 11-20-80
ACCOUNT M
VENDOR Y. ITEK DESCRIPTION VEIMN- VENDOR WNW— VFNDOR VEN Ft ~ i VMWA
i
k
L 375 Uniform pants 21,43 19.25 20.73 22.60 20,75 *14.00 5250.00 r
i
i
2. 316 Shirts-short sleeve 9129 8.25 8.32 9.70 8.85 67.30 2306.80 1
E 3
j
3. 30 erirts-long sleeve 10.86 10.00 9.74 11.30 9.85 68.80 ` 264,00~
4. 11 officers shirts- short sleeve 9.29 8.25 8.32 9.70 8.85 67.30 80130
5. 19 Uniform jackets 36.94 35.00 36.28 39.70 +32,75 NIB 622.25 . j
6. 14 Heavy duty jacket 48.49 50.00 48.25 52.70 X4430 47.00 623.00
Delivery 45 days 4-6 wks 8-10 wkd 45 days 45 days 45 days ' 45 day
Terms met. 30 Net, met. 30 Net. 10 Net. Net. 10 Nit.
Total of low bids 9
,14b.>i5
{
E ~ 1
i
~ i
.
i i
1
I
'I
i
i
I
E
_ sane
I
i
CITY COMMIL ACEt1DA
SL@@l.AY SHEET
t
Heating Dittos December 2, 1980 i
Council Agenda Item It
Subject: I
Bid /8835 Culvert Pipe '
yy 9 e
Summary: This is for the purchase of 44" culvert pips to
use in the drainage. of the service cantor p'iiop/rs~y
'
for We wt the this of the aarohoue office facility,
hie bid to four distributors of steel culvert
pips, we received two bids, one no ioply and ona to
late to consider,
Action Requireds Approval of lox bid as recometended.
Alternatives: none
Source of iundas Warehouse/Office funding ;
Bacosmendationt
We reconmiend this bid be axardad to the low bidder,
Texas Stool'Culvart$ at $13.43 per foot for the
total purchase of '10,491.00, delivery 3 "to S days
ARO
n
Exhibits Tabulation ehlet.
r 8ubsitt6d byt John J. Harahall, C,p,H.
Yurehraitig Agent
i p..
r
.R
/r.t^
F
DID 1 8835
DID Culvert Pipe Texas Armco,
Steel Inc.
r OPEN 11-20-80 Culvert
ACCOUNT 1
ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDO11- VENDOR- VENDOR VENDOR Vi'A6d
R VENWrt fwR-
-i
f
I
I. 780 culvert pipe 13.45 Et. 15.04 Et
t.
42" v/connector bands
Delivery 3-5 days 7 days
Net 10
Tome
r
ry
01
f I
{
Decmeber 2, 1980
I '
I
E CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #
{
SUBJECT:
Bid 8827: Spencer 138/69 RV Interchange Supervisory Control
and Data Acquisition (SCDA) Equipment
SUMMARY: I
Bids were taken for computer control system hardware and for
program changes (software) to the existing computer to
accomodate the co0rol - of the new Denton-TMPA-TP&L 138,000
volt to 69,000 volt substation interchange presently being I,
constructed at the Spencer steam Electric Power Pllnt. Only
one bid was received which was from BWT-Basic of Houston, the
original supplier of the existing computer and control system.
The bid was as follows
New Spencer Plant Control System Hardware $13,010
New Spencer Plant Software $19,250
Supplemental software-Basic service $ 7,700
A) Name change of Taltferro Substation >
to North Lakes Substation $ 770
H) Name change of Spencer O.C.B.354
TP&L tie to TMPA Tie $ $85
C) Trend Package $ 4,235
D) Changeable Feeder Limits $ 2;)10
E) Addition of Power Factor Logging $ 1,925
TOTAL $49,585 t;r
Other bidders indicated that in order to modify the software,
it would cost approximately $600000 since their personnel r4
would first have to become familiar with Denton's existing
software. !
FISCAL SUMMARYe
Tofai Cost$ $49,585
Source of Funds:
Electric Department Budget
Acct, 02-53-92-17 (Capital Account)
1
1 C
1
Only $30,000 had been budgeted for this. However, funds had
been budgeted for purchasing the right of.way for the 1380000
volt line from 9peacer Plont to TPaL's Corinth Substation and
TMPA now plans to acquire this ROW. Therefore, funds can be
transferred from this RM, budget account to this capital
equipment account.
ACTION REQUIREDs
Approval by the City Council tt.at th,i bid be awarded to
BWT-Basic.
ALTERNATIVES e Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATIONt
The Public Utilities Board, at tha!Y meeting of November 25,
1980, recommended that Bid 8827 in the amount of 549,58$ be
awarded to 9WT-Basic of Houston, Texas.
RJspectfully,
R, E, Nelson
Director of Utilities
EBHIBITSi 93d Sheets r~
,i X a
4 r~
1 p
' x
\ y
41
i } rat
l 4{ l
;1. i M
z e
i ~ n
-
Y 1~
i
_ u'el n~MNa!'.g>,;rM,wa+f»vi.. na r..«.,
BID NUMBER 8827 BID PROPOSALS Page 2 of 9
ITEM STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION MAN. PRICE
AMOONT
10 New Spencer Interchange A.T.U. Hardware 1 13~ of U`
2. New Spencer Interchange R,T.U. supportinj and I
incorp•,rating software.
1 14
3. Supplementary Software: 7ryOV
n:
A. Name change Taliferro to North takes 1.
substation ac specified. 1 '178
B. Name change Spencer 048, 3$0 T.P. 6 L.
tie to T.M.P.A. tie as specified. 1
.r
C. "Trend package" as specified. 1 4936'
D. Changeable feeder limits as specified. 1 7 31 441
E. Addition of Power factor logging as
f
specified. 1 IqZ~ E ' .
17j 32
4 r
'U, 4
r 1
I
i ,
R
I
b
TOTA0 q' S8s
yp
We quote the above Lo.b. Denton, 'T'exas. Shipment ctn be made in 12~ dsys frornrecelpt of order, Tarnie
..not It not otherwise Indicated.
In submitting the above bid, the vendor Agrees that acceptance of Any or all bid Items by the City of Denton, Texas within is
reasonable period of time constltues a contract.
{ j 0814 Bidder P 1 S C AV e.
e Signature ll:,' tact( veld. „Jz~flyb~f
44
Mo b*
I
i
l
I
I
i
•
t :.r.•rn°i '1r a:A,Yt:. ..r:c.yi ls. •tx
I
CITY COUNCIL ACBND\
SUlbMV SHE,&T
i
Meeting Dates December 2, 1960
k Council Agenda Item !t
Subjects P.O. 043173 Clow-Pump Division
Summary I This purchase order is fer tits purchase of repair ,
parts for a P,arminutor its ulc'at the Wastewater
' Treatment Mat, These parts are one aqurC4 from . ;
the manufacturer.
! ,r
Action Requiradt Approval se recommended.
Alternativeas none
Source of Pundit Sudgeted 04.70-83-39
Recom odationt We recommend this purchase order be npptovid for
the pntichas e: of these one gduiii r'~Aii parts far
the aforeme►5tioned equipments at the Wastewater
Trastrcat Plant. r
Csshibltas Purchase order 045113 for $3,941.96. ,
Subsitted byt John J, Marehall, C,P.M, E
Purchasing Agent
i
1
1
f
f
E
ii
i t
,
y
s CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 45173
811/792.1661 01rW Metre 71T-862
VIND" No. DAII Sept 220 1980 w No. Non
f ?W1 AU nT No. 110NE
CLOW owmv sATt ASAP AW. NO. 04-70-'83-39
Pump Division
1999 North Ruby Street %W Yu
Melrose Park, IL 60160
i Tel CITY OF DINTON
Wastewater Treatrent ;
Maybill Poad
! DentoofTexam 76201
[ ITLM CITVSTOCKNUMS[P OlICPI►TION OUAN. NI 014109 AMOUNT k f~ t
'a
I
Parts for Sarrinutor
{ 1 1221 Pinion 2t
fI 2. 0220 Sot Serer 3116" x 1821le 2
300248 Set Screw 3/8" x 16 x h" 2
4. 0249 Isom Cear 2
3. '018¢ MittV 1/8" P.T. X k" Tube 2
6. 0184 Tabs k 4 31 10" 1 '
76 0207 6pliaed Drive Shalt 1
E, 8. 0210 Splioed Sprocket 1
9fr 0764 Sprocket 1 I
{ 10. 1240 Screw$ Noa. 94. 010-34 x 11/12" 64 ,
11. 0288 Shur bsr 64
12. ;
0990 Cutter Sal! 6
13. 0417 Screw Noe, gds 4 Loctaraaher ic"-20 x 1/8" 4
14, 6463 Cloaq Ung (2rd)
13. 0286 Clare Rind 1
i j
E~E
I ~
I
f
I
~I lot 3 947.96
SNOW r. 40, ON A" 5WN;RS, "MPY TCRm. INVOICE a 1ND~u !N CUP CA M ACCOVWM ArMLL flN T, Of 01NTON,
M" M **a MW "M TAR AS PIP NMI IPl OW NO G~ fl of Of NTON IS M00IITI0 PPOM PAYM FM MMCN00117 10001 IT It
MCWIO. ALL aerMNTS MUST IS $.O.I.. Nit Or WOO. T". OIP5C1' All RO MS to
CITY Of 01WON, PURCHASING Wt.
I 218 9. MaK" by_: -
III bM+ten, Yaw y6201 !
v FOAM NO. 011110
{
;i
i
I
' r 0. w. ,.,'t S.r. N:,'{I t Y"IR•f. 1 f • ~~.i,-r .r w av.., i
CITY C."UNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY S4ET
Meeting Dates December 2, 1980
City Council Agenda Item A
Sublecti'•ApproVal of the final replet of John.Roady Addition.
Summary: .The dtdeloper seeks to replat a .7 acra parcel located alongg
the north side of Cordell Strett so the 'property will be suitable for
his plans for multi-family development.
I rsw
Actiyi Required: npprnVal"of the replat.
Alternativet 1. Approval of the replat.
2. Table the replat.
Recommandationt The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item
'at
their meeting of November Igo 1980 and unanimously recommads approval
of the replat.
Exhibit: 1. Map.
I
; I
x
Y ~'n y- x 5• r
i a~ f 4, ✓Rt'.p~
14
Owl
1 '
1
John Roady Addition
I
N. oil 1d40't att..
u ta' MW tea : is to
SjL K.
3A j4A ? QA 6A r,
It 604 94r Go" ads ~l r
i
l l .l
00
. ~ I .E
r'
Aid
A'•
F
1
1 e.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMdARY SHEET
» j
MEETING DATES December 2, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM !
SUBJECT; Approval of the final plat of Wimbleton Village Phase V
a SUMMARY: The developer seeks to plat a 1.4 acre parcel located along the east i
side of State School Road. Wimbleton Boulevard and'a'Drainaya Channel E
Is being dedicated to the City. The 7.0 acre parcel being plattid'is`a
part 'of a planned development (PD-12) and the designated land use is
office.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the final `plat of Wimbleton Village Phase V.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approval of the plat.
2. ?able the plat.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planhinnss and Zoning Commission consider this item,at their
meeting of November 191 IWO. the Commission -ranimously
recommends approval of the plat. -
EVIBIT: I. Kip
h
J
t
A
e,
f
1
t
"Wi
_ n. ..1 b1:~raYn.,dS`5 ♦'ol+i5 M^Irv,rt„~. - , ,
Wimbleton Village Phase V
I I~ r f.r~q W I
r M
1 I
i T tw► Ravi y;
l okq'V,
e1 ~ ~ \ 1 •1`` M1.N .»Mi i 1.
1
1
1 rl
~r ,Y..
i
1
.,a
`;-4~