HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-24-81
t '
I.na •.+F. n~}.'1TM!?ITs r lxrV,l 4sa .I }i1~~~~J. ~ Vi'. ct d.. ,n. .._....e a.
11[
f V ~ .
AGENDA
i CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
July 24► 1981
special Called Joint Meeting of the City of Denton City Council
and the Denton County Commissioners at 200 P.m,, Friday, July
r 24, 1981 at the Ramada inn at which the following items of
business will be considered.
' 12100 P.m.
Discussion on the Housing Bond Program.
2, Discussion on City/County jointly funded programs,
Executive Sessions 11
A. Legal Matters - Under Sao. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
y' V.A,T.B
Real Estate - Under Geo. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 f
V,A.T.B.
Co Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art, 6252-17 V,A.T.B,
D, Board _Appointments - Under Soo, 2(g), Art,
6256-17 V,A,T.B.
40 Approval of appointments to the Board of Equalization,
1
i
P 1 1
IY
J
x
8699A
tip,
a,Rw.wJw7,•.\:i:r;.#.1,#NRI'1'i:W..4':•.-4 YMy+!
n
r
1
Crrr of LINNTON, reXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $66.8200'',
MEMORANDUM
TOI King Cole, Assistant City Manager
FROM; John G. Maxwell, Safety Director' ,
DATE: July 150 1981 'i
SUBJECT: Ambulance Service I
The City Budget for the Ambulance Service is estimated to be $388,374,00 for
1981-620 as follows:
OPERATION COST PERS NNEL
1, Gat d 011. . . 60651 Budget. 240,621 '
2. ' Maintenance 111178 FICA. . . . . 11,843
3'. Medical Su p11es.. . . 11,963 Firemen Pension . 13,0!2
4. Radio Maintenance . . 700 Longevity . . 30312
l 6. New ambulance , 33,000 Insurance . 60016
6. Motor Pool (Depreciation) 17,651 Workman Compensation, 2,450 1
7. Life-Pak 6 . 6,400 Education Incentive 8,400
Overtime, . , 9,891
TOTAL -WOW TOTAL 3OZ 0231
i
In 1980 we collected in Revenue $x0,515.00, which was only 111% of the ae:ount
received for 1,921 calls.
i This shows that each run cost us about $222.00 and we receive $21,00.
Other Revenues:
1980 Revenue . 409516
Denton County.. . 103,020
I Other Cities . . . 10,380
City of Denton Share 63.300
TOTAL 2070215
Projected Revenues for 1981.821 1.50 Per Capita}
*Denton County. . . . 104,202
Other Cities . . . 11,624 31.00
City of Denton Share . 510,150
j Collection on Runs
TOTAL 216,916
a...,...
11
f
r
page 2• of 2 pages
h cost of Service. . . • , • 388,374
operation Loss . . . . . • 171,398
I feel that the county is ready to increase their per capita contribute but
even if they go to $2,00 per capita it will only increase their contribution ;
v by 34j734.
By raising the cost of other cities would only increase theirs by $11,624 j
and the City,of Denton Share 51,150.
Total Increase • . 97,508
t u.
Operation toss ~ . 73,890
9 ,
ti•:
` a, Maxwell k
fety 01 rector
JW/1 s
'
I
i
i,
:r
l r'
1
4 EMILY FOWLER LIBRARY
PROPOSED 1981-82 BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
erv ca Ma n enance $ 11,323
j Office/Clerical 173,105
Professional 5605$1
Management/Supervision 300088
E
FICA 160119
f TMRS 910!9
Workers Compensatiotl 98$
Longevity 2,936 i
Health/L fe Insurance 8 157
3UO,
SUPPLIES AND SUNDRY
$ 3,375
ice supplies
Hooks/Magazines 21650
pottage 2,675
Janitor Supplies 600
Recreation Program 75
Film 50
City Ordinance Supplement so
MAINTENANCE
Office Machines 10040
Machinery i Equipment Soo
Book Bindery 2
BERVICE
*19
phono $ 2,260
Special services W00
Travel Expense 2,100
Dues/Publications 400
Utilities 36,390
Schools/Seminars $ 1,000
47 780
l
INSURANCE
re Coverage $ 3,260
oeneral Liability 130
Faithful Performance 60
200
Plato C1era
,
$3t54a
FIXED ASSETS
' s 300
Records Tapes $
Books 24 7
DEBT SERVICE $110,519
TOTAL $5081605
i
E
< <a
R AS 0 L U T___I 0 1
WHEREAS, Ordinanco No. 80.48 requires that the city Council
of the City of Denton, Texas, annually appoint three members to i
the Board of Equalization designating one member as Chairman;
and I
1RiEREAS Garland Cates, Jerry Gaga and George Ritter are
real property taxpaying citizens of the City of Denton, are
arty values and are
well acquainted with real and personal prop
not in arrears in the payment of any taxes or other liabilities
due the City; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT MOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIt Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: ii
SECTION I.
Pursuant to the terms and provisions of. Ordinance No. 80-48
of the city of Denton, Texas, Garland Cates, Jerry Gage and ,
George Ritter are hereby appointed to the Board of Equalization
j.
I for a terra not to exceed one year,
St:CTION II.
4 is hereby designated Chairman {
j
of the Board of Equalization.
SECTION III.
This Resolution shall become effective from and after its s
i
date of passage and approval
PASSED AND APPROVEO this the _ day of
is
1081.
I
Kl}CY~'~
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST.
~a.
G"rrtY"S' 1' , 1" 1
xR019ti nDnr, " p r
CITY OF nr.VTON, TEKhL'~ S
r
a .
i
i
I N S T 11 T I 0 1 A
tvrvr ■ttx THl$ SHIM
y
HEAD 'CHI$ ! lLli:
Yt.
i I
A
A
j
a
y ` r` I
if r] tl Y. fI Y''.
-r
~ri err - -r,.
~~r,` .v a.. a.,,.~pp Mbi4Y+f✓,l rryyn,. G,I:'R ySF~~Y+'N2 w/Y~JyiM~~% f
1
r~
. r°'.aN•YMMheraaa flYWY, vrw,K+a.. ,1
i
AGENDA 1
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
July 21, 1961
Re Clty of Denton City Council at 5160
gular Meatinq of the
p.m l Tueeti July 21, 1961 in the council chsmbers of the ar
r Municipal Building at which the follOvinq items of businois
will be considered. "
500 p.m.
Consider p report from liret southwest Company on !!casing ,Y~
Finance Bonds,
2. Executive seesiong
A- Legal !tatters - Under Sec. 21el, Art- 6252-17
8. Real Estate Under gee, 2(f)s Anti 6252-17 V.hT-s. ;,i
„ .
C- Personnel - Under $ec, 219), Art. 6252-17 V,A.Tds,
D. Hoard Appointments - Under see. 2(g) ► Art. 6256-17
7100 1
3, Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 9, cF
1461- ~I
{
46 Consent Agenda
1
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff And
approval thereof will be striotty on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent K9411da
authorises the City Manager or his designee to implement
each item In accordance with the staff recommendations.
4 A. Bids and Purchase Orders! I1
16 Bid 1 8913 Economy Pickup
Qrfir; ' a, 81d 1 6914 Street lights 3
t S. Public Hearings ' j
{
sxat!on of the City Power Plant,
A. Approval of the demon
C{!
. n g..
7
owl
i
DENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
if during the course of the meeting covered by this
notice the Council should determine that a closed or executive
meeting or session of the Council or a consultation with the
City Attorney should be held or is required, then such closed
or executive meeting or session or consultation` with .its
attorney (as authorized by Article 6252-17 and Artiole'6256-17,
Texas Revised Civil Statutes) Will L4 held by the Council at
ace g vin in this notice or as soon after
the ate, our an place-
the commencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the
council may conveniently meet in such closed or executive
meeting or session. The Council may consult with the City
Attorney concerning any and all subjects and for any and all
purposes permitted by the following sections of Article 6252-17 Y`
and 6256-17r '
Section 2(e)t attorney consultation re ardin
settlements, litigations or matters deemed sub?eot to
the Code of Professional Responsibility of the State
Bar' of Texas.
Furthermore, the Council may determine to enter into y
executive session with or without i attorney asprovtded-in
j Article 6252-17 Sections 2(f), 2(g), and Article 6256'17 2(0),
for the purpose of discussing the followingi
Article 6252-17 Section 2(f)l cost or value of real
0, propparty, or ggifts.
Artiole 6252-17 Section 2(g)l personnel matters.
Article'6256-17 Section 2(g)l board appointments.
Should any final action, final decision, or final vote
be required in the opinion of the Council with regard to any
matter considered in such closed or executive meetingy or
session or consultation with the City Attorney then such final i
action, final decision, or final vote shall be at either (a)
the open meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of
this public meeting) or (b) at a subsequent public meetino of I
the Council upon notice thereof as the Council shiii deteimipes
i
Y S
ICA
1
~M
t
City of Denton City Council Agenda
July lit 1981
Page Two
6. Adoption of ar. ordinance amending Part of planned
development (PD-25) and changing the zoning from e7-7 to
planned development to permit development of one family
attached dwellings on 4.l core Parcel located on the south
(Th
Bide, of Windsor Drive, Comaila ion recommends approval). e Planning and Zoning
7, Resolutions
he Adoption of a resolution requesting an internal
j
auditor for the TMPA Board of Directorsi
B, Adoption of a rl)solution conbarning terms of office
of,d-reators appointed by each City and officers of
r.
T.M.i.A. 7
6. introduction of an ordinance instituting annexation p
proceedings on a tract approximately 63 cores in also
which beg ino approximately 200 leeE south of the
intersection of Hobson Lane and pM 1830. (Xalsoyj a-lito .
90 Receive a report from the City staff on the Carroll
Boulevard study.
304 Receive a report from the city staff on the now Police
building,
r
lie Discussion on the possible City funding for the final copy. i ,
of the Denton 8010 report, E ,
144 locative a report from the rinanoe Director on the r
3:
Alexander Grant Minage.aant letter.
13. Approval of appointments to the Board of nqualisation,
I
14. Discussion of a Board and Commission Member's strvios j
Award function. i!
15. Official Action on Executive Session ttemr
A. Legal Matters
,
B, Real notate it
y C, Personnel
U, Board Appointments
WI
Y ,df
'lip I It.
i
City of Denton City Council Agenda
July 21, 1981
Page Three
e
16, New 9usinessl l
This section provides City Council at-Abore a section in
which to suggest new items of business for tutus agendas, i-
I
d j ~ ~ F~(iR
a
Y'
rn
8621A
e,
R.
Y;
.J V1
I
CITY CP DENTOR CITY COUNCIL
June 9, 1981
I ?79
i
ppe0ial oalled maetiag of the City Council at S100 P.n., 100eday, Juno 9, 19810
to the COuacLl Chlmberl Of the Municipal Building.
St00 p.m. I
"Ore "tjLQ tee "XSE r Mayor ltanrt, Mayor Pro Tee ltephoas, Cour;di Members Oa31ay,
Taltaferro, Alford, Riddlosperger, and Cber.
0,10ILA A 3W: Nona. i
i
$1~T Y {j1 r city Maaater, Chris Nartunpi City Attoraay, C. J. Taylor* Tr.t I
and Acting City Naeratary, pill Angola, 1
t ` t 1. The Council conveoad into Cxodutin $euton at S100 p.a. to dtiouu Lags, r
Matters, Past tetate, Par6onsel, and Board Appolotmantl,
TrOO
P.m.
'
The Counatl 0011w604 to d,+0a 1061106 it T:00 P.M.
;
2. The Coumll eotstdorod approval tar the City Ma agor to execute a contract
vith the North Tex" Ccmminl0n and for payment of wuit dual,
(1 Chris Hartung hriafed the Council on this item stating that the purpose of North
Texu Canmisslon to to attract quality Industry to the north Taxes region through
{ d national and Iotoroatiotal marketing campaigns. Annual duel payments for their
611160 mould be 11,663.00.
Motion vu suds ty Taliaforro, llcondad by Chev td authorise the City Malager to
execute the contract vitb the North Texas Coamiuloa and provide for the payment
at annual dues, Motion dlrried unsaimoully.
3. The Council considered approval of kbd request to extend the ourfav for
Fred Moore park to 1200, midnight to June 19 and 20, 1901, for the Jcaotoentn 4,.
asletratiea.
Motion was Bade ly Chav, secoaded by Talittwi to approve this request. Motion r
carried unantmeueiiy.
k the Council cootidered a reaoexsen4ation from the Traffic UtotY Support
Coomilaton to remove no parking en the out side of Austtt Street from Rtekary
to MtdUrry.
Rich grehlo briefed the Board on this item static$ that this item vu geierated ~
at the request of first Beata Dank to allov additional parities in this arod,.
Parking vu originally removed from this street due to the aanstruettda of od"ltloaa
to the First state peak building vhiah to acv eoeplote
Motion rem suds by Ckav evadod W Utley to remora ad parting on the east old$
of Austin street from Ntekery to Nullsrry sad to restrict perking to a tvo-beur
limit, Motion carried u6anlmdully.
The folleviag ordlamea Val prsaaatedt
ro. 81.56
At ORDINlrCS PROBIBITIV TRI PAPKM OF YCNICUS or BOTB 1=28 OF PANSY IThnT FBOM
8:00 P.M. to MOO A.M.t oaYIDLNO A IrnWILfTY 01AUS21 PBOYIDINd A PlYALTY NOT I
TO FXCVD TWO AURMRBD DOLL081 AND UCLARM AN Ilya rn DATI.
i
Risk grobia ttifted the Council of this item stating that this item w1 generated
at the request of the ruldonts of the area to prevent groups of people from .t the gathering and of BsmeY street carats the evening hours,
Motion We made ty chev, st"adoi by Oailey that the drdtaando be adopted. On roll
ca+l raid, dal10Y "afire","Chou "aye", Tallalarrc "aya", Alford "aye", Niddlssperfte
"aye", std stspbetl aye". Nation earrild unaalmouly.
i
r+.
k
yrs.
law.
,
Juan 9. 1981, Continued
2fiU
6. The follovMas ordlnance 1441 prettated:
1101 01-55
Ail ORDIbARCt Al4NDIE0 BtCTIOII 24-llS Of TRt CODE OF Tfti CITY OF Pt", TVA hY
ADDIRO A 9tNz TIE was rT11:00 P M. tAM 6100pA M. 00 TNT rotwwIRG DAY1
LOCATIONS Br
Aim DECLARIRO AN VTtCTM DATE.
Rick Pablo briefed the Council ea thin item stating that this ordinance vadd ~
remora parkins arauad frad Koare park betvas the hours of 11100 p.m. cad 6:00 a.m 1
as roquested ty the ralideate Of the area. f}f
i
.
Kotion was We ty Chw, saconded by Tdlaferro, that tr.e ordinance be 98004
On roll tall rote, Galley "ar","Chav "eye", Talieforro "aye", Alford "aye , Riddle-
apergdr "aye", and Ettphdae aye", Kotion ea-ried unanimously.
anniq and tonntal
by thegutdivisiollRegulations Advisorya Coof the mmittee and thetl Pla td
Cowe1100.
Floyd KaDesielo of the Eubdivistoo Regulatiras Advisory Coemdesiea triefed the r4ard
on tale item Stating the basic situattor vbich vould trigger annexation proceedings
for trots policy toth as ra territorial e oed u jurls8lotion of the City of Down. The an-
n It to !ha idaerd policy et the City of Denton to ueeu on a tale by
C1610 baste the s,naexStion of areal in the RTJ within the arts, ddiratnd
i is the Development Win so the mito 0! KaJor Vrlan Development ,
4 wbda in this area. llgaiticaat develepmeate are proposed or enduring. MfI
The folloving are guidelines for determining rhea annexation should
be coseldered: S'y
1 Emile family developpmodate a or lire local
21 Kulti-family industrial or commdmial do lopmonte err dad serci
S Any area or part thereof It the Ascolty exceeds 500 units per
oqu►re mllat
L) Aar dwslepmdat or area that sight pruerl a HgatfleaaE SmpLeL i
upom the city is such ways as service cost, increoead traffic,
witlity utructlee pr4ctleee! eeeromeatal wthatla quality or other !
} to
similar community impacts. 111
when the above conditions exist, appropriate city staff shall rerlev
i for tha purpo d of considering annexation. Anedxotioa studies owl
isolude consideration Of unexation of logical planning awned around the
Li i area of initial castors.
is studying the question of vtdtber or not to Sand the following
criteria shall be considere6 as a minimum:
1) The ability of the city to furnish larvicide vithln a reedanall-l ,
i
time (within S yea's the Berries loyal should be equal to other
comparsbia areas !aside the city ilmite)I
2) The need AM quality of load use and building controls, (PriwSe
Controls can la dodsidortd)j
S) Current end planned previsions for community facilities rob as
reads, atilitia , eto. (Private faailities can be eeasiddroOl
i) IaPadt en the city both Wreak and lead Santa, iaaluding u a
tiafmua:
a steed dent Sol, benefits
e d) S inlrutrualastructuurs, health of reads, utilities end other community fsailltiu
•t buildias/derelopment quality
fl Aesthetic quality
g a0musity chareater
5) Cealorswoo Mth iWer sad to lasurd eonforh►nde with tae Denton
Development 0ulde. 4.
It Etter prllfmittry study, the Store triteria On balance iadiestal S j a'
seriously ooauder aiae4eica in order to prowto at protect `
{ pad to more
r the pubtia tsterelt then the 4ity rill IL" tote formal s,anexatiM pretadinsa
to toolidar the aneexatian quedties.is detail
r 4p, la,; If A property is the tv is contiguous to the City .:.,ta Stid the evaor
of aid property desires that it to Saedxld is order to to qua..:,:
M-6116 miy tye ali when available, and t to olfaradi lost t pretsatios,
the ovaar
q.
i
;use 9, 19811 Continued 81
E
?lotion was made W Riddlesperger, seccAl\d W Alford to approve the annexation
1 policy a written. motion carried uaanimauely, 1 ,
i
6, The council coasidered discussion on the continued existence of the Community 1
rthnia Relations Board.
Nargarat Green briefed the board on this Item stating that per the Council's
tastrueLtons, the stall had rsvfwed Ike most add value of the continued existence i
of the Community Ethnic Relations Board. This reriw revealed that this bard
has been inaotiw for approximately three years and that Lhe remaining board members
felt that there was no real purpose in continuing to Wrists this board, tbuo.ore
the state recommends that the Community ttbato Relations board be discontinued
at the pressat time.
it was the consensus of opinion of the Council that this Board should to discoo-
iA tinned. The Council 1vLructs4 the staff to draft the appropriate ordlaance
AICAL vould stolislr the Board.
A
9. The Council eonsiderad discussion on the continued exiRnace of the Researek
Led teonomla Development loud.
M Bill Angelo briefed the Board on this item stating that during the last tvo Years
1 this Board has kad difficulties in obtaining a Quorum for its monthly meetings,
CO The matters of this Board vsre unanimous is their opinion that the Board served
do real purpose at the priesat time and that the board should be discontinued a,
d until a need arose for reinstituting the Board.
a It vas the consensus at opinion of the Council that the Research and Bcodomic
DwelopmemL Board to discontinued at tte presint time, The staff was inatruatod `
to prepare the apprapriats ordinsnce atolishing this loud, it
~ k
10. The Council considered approval of a abuse order add final payment to Bogle
Ford Construction Company tar the Peeaa Creek weer line and the Audra lane sever i
aolleation system,
Bob Reload lrleted this Board on this item stating that these projects keg been
completed and that it ws aseeseary to approve r tidal mkange crier to adjust all
repowl items to the exact quantities installed. The tidal contract amount vas
'027 do and tidal Payment on this protest was is order in the amount of
!7,139.11. Tks Public Witties Board reao®ended ►ppeaval at the change order !
sad find payment,
Notion was aade by RlEdiNperger, seconded br Chow to approve the change order and
P tidal payment. Mice carried dnaaimously,
11, mayor Pro To Btephins announced that there vas no official action an useutiw
died items.
,
Bee E
a 11, N fr Pro Tan supheds called for items of now bueiaers, Thera were no items
aw twstned,
of
13. Notion vas made by Chow, seconded by Oailey to adjourn, motion carried
unadmoudy.
The council adjourdnd at 1140 P.A.
.
ICRARD 0. FR ART, W-
ei" of DDINS
1
CITY OP times
i
r
it. i .i
.J T.
y.. e..•IXi1l aY.l.y Y:.+Y°y ii\ W.S.."., r . .i
f
1
City Council Agenda
Summary Sheet
i
i
i
Meeting Dates July 21, 1981
Agenda item 81
Sub Sid Number 8913 Economy Size Pick-t p.
ject~ J
Summaxyt This bid $9 for the purchase of, three economy else
pick-ups. These vehicles are uotor pool replacements
for unit number 5103 assigned to Electric production
DegartmentJand unit number 1090 and 1130 assigned to
the Engineering and Inspection DeparE~ent., The old
unite will be transfered to light duty service or a
sold at public auction. Unit number 1120 will also
be retired and not replaced.
Action Required: Approval by Council and award of bid.
Source of Funds! The purchase of the vehicles will be funded from. three
accounts, 02-51-91-04 ($48'73444) Electric Production
j
fixed assets, 01-10-91-04 ($;507,63) Engineering fined
l assets and 06-00-87-07 ($10,237.93) Motor pool replace-
ments,
~!icommendationl We recommend this; bid be awarded to the low bidder of
I
Hill titter Ford i,, the amount of $60813.00 pe unit,
total bid 920,619.30 708 Denton, Terns net. 30, dslivary
in 45 days.
Exhibits Tetion s eat
Submitted Byt j
Tom D. Shav, P MR
Aset. Purchasing Agent
}
i
f 4 ~
4
1fJ4r I
Lr .
4
,
.
1 n~ d
.1
i
}
DIU 1 8913
DID ~.,Q Pic ~p
Dave Bill
OPEN 7-7-91 Krause Utter
Ford
ACCOUNT see memo
j -wool- HO UR
1. 3 Economy size pick-up 7170.00 6873.00 _
Delivery 2 vke. 45 days
FOB Denton Denton _ r
Hake/Model Toyota Courier -
a
j i
1
1.
r
{
a
ti
r
1
I
it
City Council Agenda
I
Summary Sheet
a
Meeting Datas July 1, 1981
1.
Agenda Item 91
• Subjects Bid number 8918 Streetlights
Summarys B number 8914 is for the purchase of 140 draft
high pressure sodium streetlights in three different
These lights will be
light distribution pattern.
numerous locations.
used throughout the city in Action Required' Approval by Council.
Source of Funds, no high pressure sodium streetlights are warehouse
inventory items and will be paid for from working
capital funds account number 05-98-81-08, the streetlights are charged to the Electric Diskribution
1 Department work orders and/or budget accounts when ,a
} placed in service. j
~ We recommend this bid be awarded to tha,low bidder of ~
Recommendations
Temple Inc. The total bid prise is $15,87Sr001 FOB Y}~
Denton, Delivery 30 days, terms net. 30.
l Exhibitai Tabulation she t
f Submitted Byt
Tom D. Shaw, C,p.H.
Asst, Purchasing Agent
1
F
1
-Bit) I 914
i
Bit) Streetlights Temple Cummins C.E. Nelson Priester Creybar WESCO
Inc. Supply Supply Electric Supply Elect.
OI'}:N 7-7-81 2:00 pm
' i
ACCOUNT I E
E D R d
r VENDOR E VENDOR VE VP VC
1. 150 Streetlight HPS It 52.50 53.46 63.10 54.00 62.88 68.00 _
I
2. 120 Streetlight,HPS 11-4 62400 65.20 63.10 65,90 62.88 68.00
i
3. 30 ' Streetlight HPS v 52.00 52.79 63.10 53.50 62.88 68.00
t~ Terms net. net. net. net. net. net.
1 delivery 28 days 28 days 31-10 H151, 6v8 wke, 4-6 wks.
i FOB Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton
Make 6 Model ITT/CE ITT CE ITT CE Best.
~ 31
r
,,.a„-,..-...~•..._._. ....-.....wow
Y
a~
t
r
1
7
:
i
City Council Agenda
Back-up Suc:u:ary Sheet
June 21, 1981
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
~t .
A State cccupatlonal tax o: 1.997% is levied on all gas used by
industrial plants within the City limits, but does not apply to
power plants that are located outside, the City limits.
FISCAL SU*CMY:
This tax amounted to $212,083.78 on gas used during 1980 at the i
Powe_'elant. While gas usage will decrease in'future years, the ,
price is expected to increase about 16% pet year. De-annexation
ii would reduce natural gas cost 1.991X.
f ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve or disapprove de-annexation of the Power Plant. 1
.j
RECM-05DATION: '
t ,
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of'April 280 1981,
E recommended dc-annexation. T'he Planniitg and Zoning Commision,
at their meeting of May 20, 1981, had a vote of 3-3 regarding
de-annexation and, therefore, and a negative' recommendation., i
x}0iIBIT: 1. Memo from E. B. Tullos
i 2. City of Denton Agenda back-up dated June 2, 1981.
}
l 3. Aerial Photo
1i
Lr
' ti r f E
i
i { I
r
i
. Yrl 1
~
71
j
i
CITY OF DENTON
ME MO RANDUSS
i
TO: Public Utilities Board
FROM: E. B, Tullos, Assistant Director of Utilities
DATE: April 20, 1981
RE: De-annexation of Denton Generation Plant Site
` The Lone Star Gas bills for
the past year- have, -been, as- follows: ~ r; January 1980 - $ 464,597.15 ` k
February 1980' - 4460094.37
March 1980 - 4420110.90
April 1980 - 449,$63.94
May 1980 - 673,531.63 f}
June 1980 1,187,568.95
July 1980 - 1,816,927.60 i
August 19,10 - 1,789,148.74
` September-1980 - 1,343,477.92'.;
October 1980 - 913,752,19 l
November 1960 5901750.81 r '
December 1980 555.094.66
510,6201119.06
A The state occupational tax at 1.997t has been $212,083.78 of this
Past years total bill. The tax is levied on all gas used by
industrial customers within the city limits, but is not for power
i plants which are located outside of city limits.
j While we expect our gas usage to decrease in future years due to
economic dispatch power and power from the TMPA generation, we
j will use some gas fuel and expect the price to increase about 161
per year. ;
De-annexation of the Spencer Power Plant property would allow a r~
1.9974 reduction in the cost of any natural gas used in the future.
ards, k I
E. B. Tullos
' Assistant Director of Utilities at
EBT/cg i
ar cc. R E. Nelson Director of Utilities
Ch t;.
arles Watkins, Planning Department €
File E
t
1
:JI
City of Denton
Memorandum
June 2, 1981
Agenda Item:
Consider the request ofthe City uf Denton for deannexation of }
the Denton Generation Plant Site (Spencer Pover Plant Prop.)
The parcel totals approxiwately 26.5 acres. a'
Summary:
• i
• This parcel is located along the north side of Spencer Road approxi-
mately 1800 feet west of Loop 288,
The City seeks deannexation in 8', ef•;ort to prevent having to pay
a state occupational tax of 1.:97% ~:.ltich is levied on all gas used F.
by industrial customers with!.n the city limits, but is not for
power plants outside of city limits.
,r
While the City expects gas usage to decrease in the future years
due to.economic dispatch power and power from the 9'MPA,generation;
it will use some gas fuel and expect the price to increase about
16% per year.
Deannexation of the Spencer Power Plant property would allow a 1.997%
reduction in the cost of any natural gas used in the future.
Fiscal Summary:
The Lone Star Gas bills for the past year have been as follows.
l January, 1980 $ 464,697.15
February, 1980 4460024.37
March, 1980 442,110,90
April, 1980 4490563.94
May, 1980 673,531.63 {
June 1980 1,181 568.95 !
July, 1080 1,816,927.80 1
August, 1980 1,789,148.74 i
Septomber, 193.0 10343,477,82
October, 1950 9130752.19
November, 1980 5900260.81
December, 1080 b!53,094,66
$10,620,119.06
i
1
i
, `
M
dUL"
an.... ...~.r.in...rl a n.(rs ..'MF.it va ..t.. . r -
Page Two
Deannexation of Power Plant
j
The state occupational tax at 1.997% has been $212,083.78 of this
past Year's total bill,
Recommendation:
The Planning Department, Utility Department, and Utilities BOArd
all recommend approval of this proposal, The Legal Department
has been consulted in regard to any possible legal complications,
and it is their feeling that the proposal is lawful. No action
was taken on this item by the Planning and Zoning Commission at
its May 20, 1981 meeting for lack of a majority ruling (vote was
3 in favor and 3 opposed).
i
v t
At
{ rep„ry.
y
i 1
~fiM1 , r ; r.
y n
t
1
ale,
4
ry~ rr,Ati w • f:.." ""IyJ era j ,...r.,.w~ at .,yTaw aws. A7. Y'(1"i M`%
~♦t1♦ (l~~ V f~ , a,•'< < •Y-1 I~ I ~1d, S # ~ yl'~ 1 1a i i 1~+ar ~
f~ a!~
~j-f'.~j~• ~Y' r .,~E: i'r~ ,~a .1 ~ Z B ~~t. , ~+S y,~'Y Ft `~y ~ ~r `17h it'y.~;,, ~ X71 r~~ SJr• 7. VI ~ Y r 1 I~'3",11
.[~<J'{~1if''a , t•'K `i xl'~it 4.v A, lY;.iIY ' Tr+T ~Z:~
' ,~r.. r .,a .i .1 7:_.4 ~,r ra• ~..ar JS." • 4°t' E
!"!'~i ~ . , .~tiY 1 ~?'•n! `a. fl tt fa'a }''t1i''t*' ttiy' aSr', r ` 1 ~b G:.5T1$~.l
t'\ • i~ ~jf~tl~`v ,Y a tl•'I afr I J)J 1~'~ a.1
+ 7, ~~1'.f.+ 1~• ?•a'1, if 1't„ 1{I . .
~ I arrl ♦ Ye}e lam Yk r 114•tt 1,. ,~'~I~, ~ JJ~•~~..at^'rri ~1',
a, yt i~ 1, •,1! ~+t • •.i'`'!f ~t~ I~f t!,?• "7aJ3"~ 1y'raw•~'
rf'!Slq~i`~•~~~ ~a~ t[ ~~~r1 lr 2 ~r~~a ,n~ryljari rti}M y'.~t'•WJ{p a, i.,,S~~1. ,~•r.S,~7;•
r~a'F /1'rnh; : 77 t !a''+~ a ,'t; • ff} ~{^y, •:"4T J<! ..i~;~./t'1'►7" ~`Y~(v ; ,41
► ~ a )1.1 jira ~ ~ , ~ ♦ E" 1, } t• ~~11i~•..~iCay7 a+,~' c 7 4U,.' : . j1 ~ aV`~„'1.1~'~ ,t C~+
rr', 'j + +L rYa4 n, M 1^,e'3S ^aaL,~j 1 i~:j~~ k ~.ar 's •~.1~ Sf l'1/ f::~ 1
' r J 1' 4'~: :it A: i ~S { `E 7~'Yl'i. er , "S t • ~~,ti ,"`~'JI~
' v~~l~l ! > .}y.l ri:j t'.y'Feti}y~''i. ~~i '.a t 1 ' 1• ~ iS,~ •,.t'♦ Y
~7Yl.~j~~• ~55.~ a{,•~~+~VY 'Ili. r (7~~,~V ~ ~ ♦ j 1>f 4.•T 4• ti ~ ~ i
~~r,~ ,r.•r 44 i'i+aSl, ~ !N `.~.n'i • ~i ~ 'ta , n 4 1. -r rr +T -r d~
1 1~ ~j }"`7J` 4r• d"r•~~.
.S ,r~j , t YT7.:...w_..7 r/t ~~.'11: b'Z'•~tt//"~(_~,',,~~'~' r.
. ti..:aL'N a • •r r i VaS J'41 ! •1i
at`ax 1 r T y VW try
1~/~~ =F,.~•! aytya y♦ ' ~'7r~16 3Mr{{f ,,'F .I-r*' . a *'w-."• •p1 1 H y Jfrr a' J' r•IIl •i% ♦
~ 11 •t a~.i f ~ ~1 7117Yr ~ . / r f. rS t'`i ?r M~.
•i rJr rY :l-a '~J IY. 11141 ~n w.'.~. a~~ '~'}7'y i'~/ Ey
_L77s1n fy`/1
~ 1 5 L ,1?'if`s ~Cr Isj 'ra .n 1 y f ✓ ^7 /r, ~
r4'
LM ry.,~r 91+{,y~1 1 i~eY}•,'{w~ r 1 I'~~'} 1 i i 7- ,1~a,il+•a5i i ?7' f..
prf7 Y.~y .1 ~.a• } r. f~~ty' E. ,I~tiir M ~(`1~r ,,+(s l{•
..~P (~3~.f1. -aC •,+1',}';'~1-~~Rf ll yIi).1}".•', ra~'+ 't lir~Fl^ ♦~i'..t~~~ ,
1 '4 7•+771 4l•`
♦ a w i 1~ i•i • M 1 !'a. a a 1 t 1 :.t17 1 *'r S`; f• 'rl M
'{f Fa , sr r„''K TM Y -w z~ s'dt' ti,.fi } 1,
f ~~.1. IT lla.`~~,7j ~rta7 ai jF~ a~y • ~ v;' •li C..) ~r 1 ~a"~~a;11-l~.•T
!~S ~'i lC td; ~4+_..~~'l-TIi: 14 ~r•a .J .a'a~~ aJ• 1r' 6=, * ~1M~ r?{•/' +S3~.A,j!
ltit~/.~ ''t ~~y s .'t S f 1' a ! a. r 1't 1 [ 'S JA i ,
e✓~l~~1. f d; I.ti~p>✓j'Y+'{~ u" '~f''~ e~ 1 ' ,S~.c.3a~J l o.~l?~ / l `I y~s ; •..A '
1 • L~}~4,~'yY xt.3~`b ~1~S~.•\N f;, 1~~+',a; t'a
'fnvo
j •J,if~~. K 4w'-
CF. w7 ^tihf S t ~t•~,3~'. y.i 4 t J~J y ,.}j ~e ti(i '"r•. Frr'~J t"` '
-f`,i' ;•t11 ,'J*'ti, •t d~1 "~I! ~~1 1. ~rll / . . 1~' ~ • ♦ l"t = ~1 1
~lt tyi 1t ! +,>A~f t t r h~'•f V•/?J { t i` Jt f . ~ j 1, ~'~1 ~f~~'f)ai'~ !
a~~ff Iilrl~. Y~i_a?i'~j~_ 1, 1`1 "•a~t:l•~1~~ ~ ,h N +~'~'.TiAft r~ ~Y9 ~S ~~,R•' l~y~~a
~ f! 4~'}~` ~r+.r,"a'~' ,t~ '~t✓f~+♦J~.~, ~ , S 1 , 1 ~+~•7.i.'•~ ~ ~ . 1. ,,l~
t 1r•Tj]' j~ rywcswtivlaf., ra► a i4~Lh~' 4,~ ` Piz, ' t $ k a+ ~ 1 -an f ~ J~t;'~~ti '~-+„i!~'Pc z S ~"C•~' :C~*Ila~'
~ Ij ~~c~~~•r~?r ,
•r "F[~ r ~7'~~i•1 ~j/~.'st.~t 1 Y~i"'r .t{•'~+~ t.Ll~ .i ~'i •
~t•'ity1 • a
rwN.?Kyhy M,~a•
; ~y •fi .f~~~,. I„i V~~jt'} ~'~`s '~1h:~~•~!i P"~1't't ~ ''~P.1
* , , ✓ Ia• •4 , v ~f~yY ~y» y~~.~Vt~f t' t~, !1,~.'~~('r5la~:C iS1•a~y..7~ +l~.Y+~~`.1. { • f
r • Ia ~ yi f oh flr;r ~~~.1a~ ~ f!'~!'~~r a ~+~{~6 ~ ~
' •hl I') . ly J •r1~~ ,~{ra~„r-1. ~'l. ~C:Yr ~ ~iy F~a`'ry a ~ ~ :u, ~ 5. u i
7 ' _ , , 1 71 a~,l • , " ,,f''-r . J `k~r. ci ' Y al j
r •`4, ~a~~ .^,~Z,~~;~„ 5, .~`a~.~ •`a." O r ' It ~ ~ tt:.~ y 4' ~~1~.~~~'y~7i~~~f~!'~~j''~jf y , r ,a41;0* ~~}t y~,t,~~,a \ C . r!
,Cta:,~.~t~/( T:t"bti.J+i•'. t i3GY,~•;L'~ ~
' ~a{s~•W. ~ ~~t~ ~a~ Ew/J"v+ ' 1 I r+ r 1 +••i ~~{•7' ~ ~~,'ra (y~.~t
♦ .••,1~~~~l ~ ` r ik r;' yy"= . 1 '',wy~ ~S~y 1. E'1 ,,~~"'`n., e/~'~g1VY Sr,~ +1..
' 'I' 1--~7r~ 1 J . .-.a.' Y'~ I~l`'r7 . E 'R{~tmY • K. i~ ~7'R': '
,yam`' { jv~ o air s c~ Y♦• r t 4..~\ •r.a 1.
1 {~'y :r a i' ► a.w Y'. i' ' 1 l~ ~;'Q.r1' rya-=~tY ,f r w' "1^~
` f1t , ~~a'Ct FS ,.wL•~.p• IN 1,(~ t p. \ ?f'~st~`!
,•y!;~ r ~ ,~~Tf~'~6/ S .3: ak., t agrN ~J•t.,,~' iy ~
'j, ~1! r 'i.• 1 Jf 'i'ce ay~~~ti".~ 1~f~'il~l r '!~"•y 1'!~-y~ yi•. ~ kcurl:Jl~.
. ~ l!, , ~'~~~1 ~ 1, f I!/Tr7♦~N~ .ti h9~r ^t~`C"":.µ.~, ~1'''{Y'a r .,~,py`,l'
„an ei •l1 , :1~ ay' '•d r,` ~.{a n 3 ~y {f,r ; r S
if J1 a-~ a{1 + . ,^N, . r, r ° ~r •~•._lyy7= fi ~t
I,. • ' ♦ it t .Y' [>;.%..y wliyy~`I~{t ) r. ~•,~`a 1,~ t7 , ,tin'Z
. i
~yV' ~I,~- ~ r j { j tr -lb, ~ 4,71h
{yi ' ~13. " s'1 '~•v"aa ! f ' 1,1Y 1 • s
~ ' ' r~ ~rwj(~." '~:',}C• ~ `L;!.'. ~ r 1')~r+ 1 t r I L FJ' r Ai~ ~ .
ppp
' ~11~ 1' N~ ~~*r1~'r •'`'-'yy art.. ~•Y ~j ~'~~T GI ~.I~,,.'`~l ~,.~~~„~r[i'`t•~~2rs~.,.'y1' •
N' ~ ~ ~ . \>''rl {~1 yt~-''~. ' a•1 1.. 1,• 'S'SZ y~t"z art' 1 ' Y~'~~}t `ry~C~j ~l
r.~~~..`'i'~•..~, t.: l 'a' ~ S i~ C., ~ `7r~ '".Y~ ~dr~ 'i'. -'I V. ~ f
•"'~Gv ~r ~y r. ,,L 'V' t ~ ,L i•F i.
y11.)7' , • ~la•77 y } -,M •'r ".Z
h'^ J Y! ♦ a f}' S•• ^•a •~jy J''41rg,.j \ 1 ,r ,
♦ .fl r_ r''•1, ~j ~r+'+~t.+-v: .•"K ►'L,,.. w , .a ,}av 1 1 •
',.i'` ',r ~t a' ~rl~ . ' ~~~~~ry~1.t•?'. r. a''a~ ! ~1~ .~~,ry~~~~ 7. 't'
1 t { 1 r t ru~•~.sl.-. ~•d1.7.. f wa ~~ay {fir '~.1 I~! '1 rrw+y'~1a a ~ tq{~17.:w~ ~r~•fy)ry ~ t
Y~ • :R~Oanf~'..a{,~ M" ..a •~"1~JJS,~Fr.J.C•. M I`iI .;Y'/•. ~'1•.I~..~isf' '.•~ICa.~ ~
t
,
r
t
_CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Back-Up Summary Slzeat
Meeting Date: July 21, 1981
City Council Agenda Item #
Subject: Adoption of an ordinance amending part of planned
development (PD-25) and changing the zoning from SF-7 j j
to Planned Development to permit development of one- 1
' family attached dwellings on a 4.1 acro parcel located
on the south side of Windsor Drive. (2-1467).
Summary: The City Council approved this zoning change at their
public hearing of November 4, 1080, with conditions
that density is limited to a maximum of 35 one family r,
attached units and a 6 foot solid masonry fence is to
be constructed along the southern boundary of the tract.
The current planned Development permits zero lot line
j on 45 x 100 foot lots.
Lill
The Petitioner was advised a number of times by the Planning
and Community Development Department that an ordinance
could not be adopted until a site plan was provided.
This has now been accomplished. Although the maximum
density is 35 units the site plan shows 26 units.
The density has been called to 26 unite by the Petitioner
due to development constraints. (0choell and fields is
the engineer on this site plan,)
Action Required: Adoption of Ordinance
LijAltornntives: 1. Approve the ordinance
Deny the ordinance
Table the ordinance
Modify the ordinance 1
Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval at their me"ting of October 15, 1980,
The City Council approved this Z-1467 at their
meeting of November 4,1080.
FYhibit: Ordinance
,
1
~N
i
i
I!
?V f UISI.~CL A :''1 .'SG ~~)i, Sr' S1}:' io 1,i'C!:l iY• 0."- Dr..'~Il\',
A.i i;':: C09! Ur
I' C'.lDIN t'C.S r7^ T`! Ctly Of 1 i, ri 0,'.~lri+~~ t:n, d^•l. F~
F:~h As S\'J ppi'1.1F. T) OF
KVtE OR LE$", C!T 0, 1FiE 6.r T R f„R. R. CR'„ IY
ASS'1'.R4CT 131, 1, T1o~'n CITY' Cr. '1'•[1 !':LRYIQrJLA.1.1,
t1E$.IlIfrh ,rCthl.`; ;A-!I YLC1uiR113 L. EFPCC'IA+C I':Y'!'E.
i 1'Ft5 -,00:X V. Ct r4F. Ciro Oc i1Jir6, 1i: t4.=, Et'd': Y 0!i Ai 1St
S-" T
ilt^ la.iinr Claos!Eira:ion a:.'. I;s si5rctle e" t':e
Eou o'.v,ng d::crl .1 property, to „It: P , F
f All that cartatn acra tract or rarctl of land sltunted in tbs If! 5
B. B: R. 3 C.R.R. Ct:rpr.r,y 5urv~1p, l:hstr4ct 'to, 186, rontvn ;
County, Tows; said tract tolnii part of n tract shgw:t by d:oc1
f to 11111 cer5.1 !la:eIu;vacnt Corporntln,i, inc. and rncorAc Sn ti'
volute VNa ;o a:9 of t',.^. bo , p.cco.d3 of t!rnt~,n Cnaity t'
Te.+,as ^na t.cln; rn-)r) pztt1:u17r1, c,.scrfb::3 its follviis: I
a
a
6 L t}:n 41 aatl',+=s t cn r n e r o f t!+ _ t r a c t Ids i nz (10 .
S
.~L. . s, ~ . t i :
j i ht'rcln nt tIn a sautti+.-,t car..er cE saki f;r.iv~rsul .:4nir'1a^,
Cutpcrnt•oa, Inc 1rr
7.ItI CL n0c 11 pin 101 1A west a Ilirtalee of S1?.Bi f:'ct to an
Ir,n pin 1? the :oeth rlyht. af•',,ny of Sln.Iscr ~r!re;
' 1ni,t Fi n'0rtb 8"0 511 S4" cast with vi 18 road o d;stnrto of
(?t F
14.43 Cr:t to an Iron p1 n; !
1'lih?iCfi a~e)LTI a Curti to the left W'0 said rand the C1111rd of r
said curve hears n:rth. $16 51' 57^ oast a dJs'anrn of 26",36 j. '
Eoct a rif stiw:m of 207,61 feet to n iron pin; l ) S
~ 1HE?iC11 I,nrth 750 52' CO" c.st W1 tit sai t!~1tAoE•+vay n
01%tznce OF 47:1 lp fest to it r.clnt;
Ik N
11fL,;CF south Ste Sn+ Vast fiS'.61 Ccat to I paint,
E }rer:> •o1tll ^1` 59' 1?' rat 2S3.5I e^::: to a q^lnt in 1'.--h j } a s
1i of jai: o:e3i Clc::; f rt
hrgi1G11 Pinta 1111ny A0s n Afore 0r 16a1.^
a
iI h.erit lr ehcrttd free planned Oev„1 e,n.n, "P 1S" and '
SIn51a-1n:It iv 'ar•71, DII,rict CIA ssirie7ticn Cie t6 2Jt,eed t
Cc:010r Int 15 A" (for ono (a r-,iiy n t1 is+ottonentl
LlstrIct C I a S " t f i ntl0a 1 " Lgc n"r Co .reh 111 a ",Hint ft
U:dini<r,.s tf t!1c r ty of 0_n.er., Ts a. a:4j,st :r, 112 f^.li.ufn @~
cotnSltiani ca9 r'strfctlonS to-wit:
t(
1. IJansit), III ha Ii•aitc3 to a nisi a of :r Orc
Eanily attach.~ units;,
s , y
2. A rIt (1') nor 1^114 a5 i•' ° ice 1,:A % 5-'e Conn rug A,; t. '11". :FMS aj+
9.C 'J . l;t'1V i?ns,
JJ !
l
1
1
1
I
,
The Conlr.,-'!p n.` the C1rvvf f Teri ,'15, ~'.,r t:~1 li
t,f t ;~rr'r':, '•n'n ~ f~.': u rtil,.,
' :L?+
I
S:'4T'n~, 1t. I
I h a t t4,s Cit/ Crvn I t; the C1 y of rrar'ton, Tax at `,k h•
fInAl t h a I snah C"ya Is in a .n 91sa with n ccmprchs,.A Iv-
~l^It fvr to^. "arpo=t of p=vtin+ tn+ w;rAl t&Fova Lf tht
~kti rf J.n:oa, 'asps, nl I.1: rk~ec ;h1a ..nslctatrtlnl a, toey 1 e
other t,1n*c fur the ehtr..,tat of t'-.a district W I it,s
pcc ulldr aclt~%IllC or plrtiC4t4r t.l5tl, W vIth V14W to
n7 t;'. ~ AI to c: t h.11 1 .11 r7a, pre .__tint 0:21 11 ,ma,
1t' r.. I I? In r n5M1 v ! t tl r•r^a 4f '1„ f'r t'7 .el
III^. u,. C a F 1 t t7 11;1 Cit of
Dabs r, TONS, nn! Its clt 4Cn
j That tails nrdl;t'lnc^ s1; 111 ba In full fnrc: W effort j
Irnel tatrl afta its pas, 1¢1 anlF anpre, eol, the Ycgtlr:a pJlIt ;
~ f hearing htivini; torctrfotr~ occ,t I'rlP iy eha Alunnitp nn•t Vnaln;
• COttmisStWl and t°v City Conicll of th^ Clty C, C:.nton, Tamns,
AftCY f,ik lp- f ti Mica t'CrG. r:.
P;l$"iin 1'~:1 1 J`. F^. tF.Id 'tC d7)' Of , w„ I
CJTY C'F' D"%Wb MU
a, I
nrlrsl, ;
i 1
CIIY CF t"r To., IF.S!S
APU07 0 '.S W l T,'I KVI
C. J. TAY16i, J' CIIY'A'fi9,.'t
CI'rt' pp 7a,rp:r, 7r'i:a
i
I
r
1
i
t:
I,
I
Ir e I
I,~. ~i• it I ~ ~ r i
f s I
f LIN k i
I
Ali 11
i
-J
l
i
• i ~ it
J
i
I
S
f
111. "
C ABSOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Denton jointly with the Cities of
Bryan Garland and Greenville have heretofore crested the Texas
Municipal Power Agency under the Laws of the State of Texasl and
NHEAEAS, the board of Directors pof the Texas Municipal
the office andsthe expenditure of tail [und rof this A`eney andf
WHEREAS, the City of Denton and the Cities of Bryan,
Garland and Greenvills have a direct interest in the msnegenlnt
and expenditure of Agency funds; Now, Therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of DINTON, TBXASf
IC ON I
The City Coonell of the City of Denton hereby request the
Board of Directors of the Texas tianicipal Power Agency to island
the ay-Lars of the Texas Municipal Power Agency to rtatli ,an
adslnista!!ve position within t1~e Agency to be known as the
" ternal Auditor" who shell bli appointed b gn kemoved from
otttee by the affirmative Vito of et is/stp lira ~S1 meebers dt
board oofdDirectors wlthj copies ofsall auditlt submitted to tho
Board to be furnished to the General Mryns ar and to the Mayor
of each of the Cities of Bryan, Denton, and and Greenville.
SICTION ll.
The City Coun``11 of the City of Denton further rsquests
thet An1+ ropeaed amendment- of the. By-Lows of the Te si
Mu lcipai ~ower Aganey be submitted to the Mayor and overnihtt
body of each of the Cities of Bryan, Dento~+ , Oarlend ar'~d
afdogvillo at least thirty I301 days before submlisten to the
lesrd of Directors in order to allow time for eonene from the
gevernins body of each City,
SECTION _111,-
4 That copies of this resolution be dubmitted to ech`member
f of the board of Directors and the Gen%rel Msnaget of the Texas
f Munielpat Power A10cy and to each dam er of the Eovarnint tally
and trio City Reneger of the Cities of Bryan, Garland and
I, Greenville. ;
PASSED AND APPROVID this the day of 1981.
CITY Of DBNTON, TRAS
{
ATTISTt
CITY OF DEN+ON, TEXAS
it x CPp JOYTAY1,01 JRi CITYA'ATTORNEY
# t CITY OP DINT64 TEXAS
BYE C
f`-r
1
I
{
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Denton jointly With the Cities Of
Bryan Harland and Greenville have lserstotors etoeted the Texts
Municipal Power Agency under the Laws of the State of Texasl and
WHEREAS, the board of Directors of the Texas Municipal
Power Agency is responsible for the proper administration of i
the offices and the expenditure of all funds oI the Ajencyl and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton and the Cities of Bryan,
Garland and Greenville have a direct Interest in the management
and expenditure of Agency fundsi Now, Therefore,
s It IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TBXASs
I
SECTION t
The City Council of the City of Denton recommends to the
overniht bodies of the Cities of Bryan Garland ind GNenville
that sac of the jovernlnj bodies of the Cities adopt a joint
concurrent ordinance a mondial section III of the joint
concurrent ordinances crletlni the Texas Municipal Power Agency
so that Section III would rot is follows)
1
SECTION III.
A. From end after July 1, 1912, the Oltletoril of the'Teitoo
Munici el Power Agency shell not b` sppoihted to ottice for A
dafini~e term of *fries$ but shall a lppeinted by Ind sar w on
the board of Directors of the Te ae Municipal Power Agency at
the Velours of the jovernintx body eppolntfnj Such Director to
the told. Directors thall be appointed b Re olution of the
joverainj body maklnj the appointment and s All ~s"appointed to
a place gam tA1 Dosed of DiNotpptl. The hate and the
gerernlnt edy of the particular All entity who may appoint
such Director to fill each plate shall be as followat
PLACE NUMIER APPOINTINO PU/LIC ANTI r'
I City of Bryan
s Ctty of Denton fi
A City:0 Denton
s City of Garland i
6 City o Garland '
T City a GNSnvilla
_ 1 city e[ areenvill4
MYY vacancy in office shell be (Iliad by the public entI
which ortjlna2ly filled outs position, it shill flat .be
necessary for a publle entity to remove its Direct0 1 Iran
office an the Board of Directors. The Resotutioa maklA9 'In
ap olntMent $hill state that "Pt et and aftit 1100 A M Control
3tonder Time on (a certain date) (name of Direeteri to hire by
Appointed to Place No. on the Board of Directors of the
Texas Municipal Power -{they is a Director from the City
8. (a) The officers of the Agency shell bet
I, President
1. Vice-President
3. secretity
t, ttnterni! Auditor
S. Letit AtAtor
6. Tfisourer
T. General Manager
j
M
i
j
t
ikt
I
who shell be appointed mad removed from office by the board of
Dl rectors. The office of President and Vice•Presldent must he
held by a current member of the board of Directors, and no one
person may hold more than one Office at the same time.
fb? The General Manager shell be the Chief Executive
and Administrative officer of the Agency and shall be
responsible to the board of Directors for the prover
adapnlstration of all affairs of the Atoney placed under hie
control. The Hoard of Directors shell further define and
provide in its by•Laws for the duties and functlons of the
General Manajer and all other officers and employees of the
Agency.
CO The Agency shalt have such other officers,
departments divisions and employees as may from time to time be
authori064 ~y the board of Directors.
SECTION 19ECTIONg 1111,111 I ,
That copies of this resolution be submitted to each rlnbor
of the board of Directors and the General Manealr of the Texas
Municippal Power Agency and to each member of the governing body
and tf~e Cfly Manager of the Cities of Bryan, Garland and
Orugrllle. '
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , loll.
CITY OP DENTON, 14AS {
ASTIM
a
pi
CITY OP DEMON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL PDRMs 1
C J. TAYLOR JR. CITY ATTORNEY
i CITY OF DEMN, AXAS i
!Ys J
4 I
I
i
I
. . y.. n..>.-err r.~ ,
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Cacl+- L'p uu~~: Sheet
Meeting Date: July 21, 1,981
City Council Agenda Item #
t Subject: Introduction of an ordinance instituting annexation
proceedings on a tract approximately 63 acres in sire
' which begins approximately 2600 feet south of the
f intersection of Hobson Lane and FM 1830. (Kelsey Z-1406)
Summary: Consistent with state law regarding annexation tho
attached ordinance annexing approximately 63 vcros i.s
being introduced. The introduction phase of the I
annexation ordinance constitutes the first reading of
l the ordinance.
Action Required: NO ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL. EXCFPT 'r
RECEIVE TILE ATTACHFD ORDINANCE.
Alternatives: 1. Receive the ordinance in order to continue
the annexation process.
n 2. Refuse to accept the ordinance.
Recommendation: To be consistent with City Council Ration at ,
the public hearing, the ordinance should be
received.
Exhibit: Ordinance.
. r
k i r r
i
't t
}R
r
rr, j,
F r
fr g
y^
1
i 1
I
f
i
1
ORDINANCE N0.
I
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OE DBNTON, TEXAS i BEING ALL THAT LOT TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONS1$11NG OF APPROXIMATELY 07.011 ACRE OF LAND LYING AND
BBINO SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS ND BEING
IN nil 3.1.3. 8 C.R.R. COMPANY SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. ~90 DENTON
COUNTY 7EXA51 CLASSIFYING THE SAME V AGRICULTURAL bISTRICT
PROPERIYI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for ennexatlon was Introduced at a
regular meetinS of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the petition of Richard Xelloyl and
o WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a puhtic hearing held Y,
for that purpose on Juno 301 1981 for all Interested persons to f
state their views and present avidencs bearing upon the ennexstion
provided by this ordinancel and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full it least
one time in the official newaPaper of the Citv of Denton, Tease,
i,
l prior to its effective date, and after the public hesringot
NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
ii HEREBY bRDAINSi
d SECTION
r
That the hereinefter described tract of 1W be, and the sere o
it hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Tosos, and the same is
made hereby a part of said City IAA the tend and the present and
P future inhabitants thereof shell be entitled to all the tights and
privileges of other Citisane of said City end hall be boua0 by
the sets Ind ordlosnees of said City now in affect or which may r
hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be
subject to and shall bear its prorate Bart of the taxes lev Gd by
the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as 1
fellows, to•witl
All that certsin 61,0ti sere tract or parcel of land sltutr4 In 3
the B.B.H. i C.R.R. Cotdpanyy Survey,' Ahstriet No. 1 0
County, Texas, said tract belni part of tract *1411 by, dad td H.
of the- Deid I
Osborne And recorded In volume 8416 Page 8N
y Ricardo of Denton County, Tests And, being sore partitulstly'
described is follewsf E
1BGINNINO for the northwest Corner of the era t bang dllerlbed
herein at a point In the north line of said 01 erne tract 1t the
1
alnt of lnterseetton of its north tine with sn eeatlrn lifts of
6hesC ty Limits of Denton, Texas to estahllshed by Ordinance No.
i
j
A 1:?
Y
r"
4.A
S ,
.
THENCE north 89° 17' Bast 1079,66 feet with the north line of
i said Osborne tract to the western line of Farm to Market Road No.
f ( 1230;
1
THENCE south 000 54' 40" east aloe; the west boundary line of
Farm to Market Road No. 1830, a distance of 576.42 feet to a steel
tin for the southeast corner of a 20+994 acre tract and being in
the north boundary line of a first tract of 61.50 ec em as
conveyyed by V. Clarence raith and wife to H. S. Osborne and wife,
Edna H. Osborne{
THENCE south 890 $3' east oloett the north boundary line of the
above mentioned 67,50 acre tract, 40.00 feet to a point In the
centrrline of farm to Market Road 16300 end bein/ in the east
boundary line of the 8.E.8. 6 C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No.
196, for the northeast corner of the pest mentioned 67,5D acre
i
tract{
THENCE mouth 000 54, 40" east along the east boundary line of I
the 5.S411d" C,R.R. Company Survey, and the centerline of arm to {
or the
Market 1830, a distance of 09L5 flat to ► point
southeast corner of the past mentioned 67.50 acre tract$ (call on
this line WAS 1107,22);
THENCE south 190 37' 22" west end passin1 ►t 40 tat the Meat
boundary line of Farm to Market Road 1850, eontlnuini{ on ilia
courle, and along existing fence line end the south boundary I no
of the passed mentioned first tract of 67,50 acts a distance of
1511,00 feet to a steel pin and tones corner Deet for the
southwest corner of tract herein described and being in the
northe uternly right way tine of the Atchison, Topsks and.Sants.
Fe Railroad;
THENCE north 330 271 west with the northeast line of r►tlrbod
198,13 feet to its intersection with the southeast line of the
City Limits of City of Denton At established by Ordinance No.
65.431
THENCE north 430 31, east 6t060 feet southlAsterlYY of and
0141161 to the centerline of V. S. Hllhw N°. 377 a tatil
~talent# of 611.6s fast to pintt of iftUrsectlon with the
southwest line otract shown by sod r kirhles Hints as recorded
in Volume 10230 pole 966 of the Doe Records of Denton County,
Texssl
THENCE south 460 09' east 60.6 feet to the Iouth Corner of #Ala
Michles Mints trmctl
THENC8 north 43° Si' east 200.u feet to the east corner of said
Michles Mints tracil
THENCE Werth 466 09 weft 80,6 loot with the 'nOttholst line of
.
} said Mlehles Mints tract to Its lnterasctten w1tA 4 s0uthe►st4rn
!`l line of City Limits of notton, faxes of astaNliished by Ordinance
No. 65.431
1 THENCa north 430 510 east 471431 foot to the point of beginning. ~I
SECTION It, I
The above described property to hereby classified of M
Alritulturol "A" District and shall so appear on tst offlctel
toning map of the City of Denton, Teras, which Tamp is hereby
Amended accordingly.
t•1496•A,NN8IUTION•1ICHARD KEL11Y•PA08 TWO
i
t p
Wool
c
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective InAedlately upon its
Passage,
PASSID AND APPROVED this the day of ,
1061.
CITY OP gj;;j;WAR
TE3f23
r
j
ATTEST:
• 4
IMUTAR
CITY OF DINIONs TEXAy a,
APPROVED AS TO LIGAL POAtAs
C, J. TAYLOR JA, CITY ATTORNEY
" CITY Of DENTbN, IAXAS
EYI
1
I
r
i
r
i
1
AN' XILSEY•PACE TNRII
yf
1 ~y■
CITY OF DENTON k
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung
r.
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: July 15, 1981
t RE: Proposed Study for North Carroll Boulevard'
i The Council asked the Staff to review the possibility of the
Staff doing an in-house study of the area. At the July 14
meeting, the Staff indicated to the Council that the study
j could be done by the Staff, however, som4 costs, as well as
time, would be incurred to accomplish it. These costs would be
for right-of-way appraisals, printing, anO. technical expertise
that are not currently Staff functions,
Basically there ate two elements to the approach. Number One
{ is the question of whether Carroll ought to be, paved as it
residential street and tied to Windsor in the near 'futu'r~..
This is what was in the Capital Improvement plan to begin ki h.
and has been recommended by Staff since 1974. The Northridge E
residents feel that this proposal is the most damaging to the r j
area, and have in fact, stated that they would rather see,*
I six lane divided street like south Carroll for their
neighborhood than for the two lane residential street, if the
two lane street was cut through, it would undoubtedly be used
by more residents to leave town by Highway 77 or. to. get to
North Lakes Park by using Carroll and the proposed Windsor
Street. It would be difficult to predict the traffic increase,
i
The second consideration is building Carroll six lanes straight
north and tying into Highway 77 or jogging the traffic east
from Carroll Boulevard, three blocks to Elm Street and then
north on Elm to points out of the City, if these were the
i alternatives to be studied by the Staff, we would suggest that
the traffic in either case would be the some since building j ,
this type of facility would indicate that theta are some major li
traffic generators on the north end of the City located along
Hi hway #7, (such as the Ti plant), Since we are considering
building six lanes either on Carroll or Elm, the assumption
i
1
Page 2
proposed Study for North Carroll Boulevard
would then be that the traffic wouli either use Elti, since
Carroll would not be tied to Highway 77, or it would use
Carroll since it would be the major tic to Highway 77, In i
either case, the traffic would be the Game. If the Carroll i
Boulevard option were pursued, there would be a minimum of lb
` tracts of land that would be affected by right-of-way E.
acquisition. The Staff would recommend that if the Carroll
approach is taken, that the widening be on the west side of the
existing Carroll, We would acquire approximately 80 to 100 }
feet of right-of-way on the west side of the existing Carroll,
This could be accomplished in front of the Nursing dome and the
two churches on the west side with relative ease, since these
building are set back quite a distance from the road, They
would entail some damages to the buildings, but since the are
set back quite far, these damages would probably be minimal,
There are also five tracts of vacant land on which right-of-way
would have to be obtr,ined. We would also have to obtain . dome
1 right-of-way on the fair grounds and move one building' there, 6
We would also have to obtain eight houses on the west side of
Carroll. The staff estimatea the cost of this right-of-way at
approximately $1,000,000. The drainage system on the Carroll
alternative would also be a little bit more extensive than the
` Elm system, We estimate the difference in cost for the
drainage to be approximately $601000, If this approach were
taken, the right-of-way for Carroll would be approximately 130
to 150 feet wide, The six lane arterial with a, 14 median
would be approximately 00' wide, This would leave
approximately 30 to 35' on each side as boulevard in relation 4
r to other existing property lines,
I If the Elm Street alternative was taken, there would also have
to be right-of-way obtained for the street, Currently# the f
right-of-way from Sherman north to Taliaferro is approximately 1[
From Taliaferro north to Orr Street the right-of-way lE
I I 60 wide,
is approximately 90' and from Orr Street to Old Sanger Rood,
t%e width varies from 60' to 120' at Sanger Road. Currently,
in the block between Sherman and Taliaferro Streat, there are
2C tracts of land, On almost al.1 of these tracts, the
right-of-way is within 20 to 30' of the front of the house,'
Since we would need a minimum of 20' of right-of-way in this
block we would be moving the right-of-way lines closer to the
existing houses, if we tried to take only the front yards,
most cases, there would be substantial damages to the remainder
r
t
4.
r`
r: ,
l
Page 3
Proposed Study for North Carroll Boulevard
r
I of each tract. We would estimate a square footage cost of not
less than $2.50 a square foot for this 20, depth of
right-of-way along Elm. This would result in a cost of
gproximately $50 010 for right-of-way within this block. In
e area north of Orr Street, the cost would be similar or ,
could be even more since there is some commercial zoning in
this area. Using this approach in putting the six lane divided
street on the Elm right-of-way, we would virtually have no
boulevards to serve as a buffer between the homes and the
existing property lines. In this particular area, most of the
homes would be within 20 to 301 of the traveled roadway versus
50 to 601 on the Carroll Boulevard option, This particular
roadway would ,miso be approximately 800' longer in construction
length At $150 per lineal foot this would equate to $1201000
in additional construction costs. We did not take into account r
expanding Sherman from Carroll to Elm to accommodate six
f lanes, if this were done it would also be an increase fn' the
construction costs. Finally, using the existing Sherman Drive
would cause some maneuvering problems, both at Elm" Street and
particular
these intersections I more incude the, urchbought at
of I
the Derby Gas Station at a minimum of $3006000. Consequently
right-of-way and additional construction costs for Elm coul~ '
f l range from $200,000 to 5000000 minimum. If the Elm Street
alternative is used, there would also be an additional s
transportation cost involved. That is, using the Elm Street
alternative would be approximately .4 of a mile longer than
going straight north on Carroll Boulevard, Assuming an average
daily traffic of 5,000 vehicles and assuming $0,25 per mile as
K the post of operating a vehicle the .4 of a mile extra
distance would cost motorists $156,000 per year, Obviously,
this mould be an ongoing cost until some other alignment was
appproved or built, Geologically, the impact on ' the
neighborhood would really would not be significantly changged b`
using one route over the other, Soil conditions are basicall
the same, drainage basins are basically vie same, etc, so thers
would not be any large environmental change. Finally the Lanu
Use Flan addressed the area of impact on the neighborhood. The
Staff feels that some sort of neighborhood questionnaire would
probablyy be the only reasonable way to access the impact, This
" should be done for both neighborhoods and the Staff recommends y
that this be done by some sort of outside consultant since
their conclusions would tend to t,% more objective and unbiased,
i
r
i
r
,des
Page 4
Proposed Study for North Carroll Boulevard
We feel that these are the main areas that the study would {
address if it were done by an outside consultant and the Staff j
could certainly put all these in a much more detailed setting.
We would be able to obtain letters of opinion on the values of
the land for approximately $300 a tract. We do not feel
comfortable in giving you an estimate on the cost of a
neighborhood questionnaire. it you would like to pursue that, i
we would contact some consulting firms and get some prices for
you.
if you or the Council have any further questions, we will both
be at the meeting on July 21.
ve a Jeff Me
~
J
i
i.
r;
f
i i
:I
i
CITY OF DENTON {
MEMORANDUM
3
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMI Margaret Ann Green, Administrative Assistant
DATE: July 16, 1981
SUBJECTS Agenda Item 611, Denton 80's Final Report Funding R'
The City Staff is investigating the availability of funding for
the Denton 8019 report, An oral report will be given at the
` Council Mee
F
.
Margo reen
NACimr
I
4sp,,
4
1 a
0663A i
1
i
F 4
i
~F
,t
C1TY0/DENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL WILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566-8200
f
F _
r
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: W. H. McNary, Director of Finance
DATE: July 150 1981
SUBJECT: STATUS OF RESPONSE TO ALEXANDER GRANT 8 COMPANY'S '
REPORT ON INTERNAV ACCOUNTING CONTROL
1 it
I
Alexander Grant and Co. submitted a "Report on Internal
Accounting Control" in conjunction with the Annual Financial
I I Report, and the following information outlines the status of
the comments in that report.
1
On pages 4 and S of this report, Alexander Grant described the
only, condition which they feel may "result in more than, a
relatively low risk that errors or irreplaritie3'in amounts
that would be material in relation to the combined financial
statements of the City of Denton, Texas may occur and not be
detected in a timely fashion." The weahesses outlined on
these pages exist in the current utility billing systeme
These concerns were expressed in the prior year also and,
resulted in a major project to replace the utility billing
systems software, The City has contracted to accomplish this I
project and the new system shall be implemented on October 1, 1
3.981...
r
j
i
6 ..,...r.a..
I
fI
Chris Hartung, City Manager ~
July 1S, 1981
Page 2
Alexander Grant outlines several considerations to be included
I with the new system.
L
Consideration Status
1. Print Bills over $100,000 Prints bills up to
s9, 999,999 ~
2. Effective correction process Generates automatic I '
without credit memos corrections without manual
intervention` and hAs
sophisticated edit features
3. Ability to reconstruct or Backup files are provided `
restore lost, damaged or daily
incorrect files '
,
4. Timely reconciliation of Reconciliation Is 'required
detail to control and produced daily
Alexander Grant has been asked to participate In the
k implementation of the system and to review the control
recesses to insure that the system has the appropriate
features.
p;.
f' l The following age outlines the additional coements and
observations which were not considered material by Alexander
Grant.
1 f
i
r
i
i
i
j I .
i
7 G e:
1
d A
. _ . yam. : 'a'-a.
1
. r,rt•fA&MiN+ik Ywk'NtY.M~-"iR "o..aY.s.. «.-w •~a':'UF= x war..... . _ . f.:
Chris Hartung, City Manager
July Is$ 1981
Page 3
' Other Comments and Observations
The outline below indicates the status on the remaining
comments:
I. Comments which are being corrected:
j Page
Access to checks 7
Utility and iax cash receipts 7
' Assessor's abstract record 8
1 ~
General fixed assets 8
Utility customer drafts 9
Conflict of Interest statements 9
a f,
{ Purchase orders 9
Non-sufficient funds checks 10
Accounting system documentation 11
II. Comments requiring further policy clarification;
Service Center 10
I Vehicle repairs 10.,
Ambulance fees 11
III. Comments which will be addressed during budget S.
formulation: '9
{ A
1 Documentation for Gasoline
Consumption 8
Deficit Position in pooled cash 11 1
i
IV. Comments which must be addressed by data processing
changes:
Traffic ticket procedures 10
Inventories 10
i9 F i
t
kk
i
n PtY y
CITY OF DENTON
MDIORANDUM j
1 I
TO: King Cole, Assistant City Manager ,
j
FROM: Bill Angeles Senior Administrative Assistant
DATE: July 14, 1981
A 3
SUBJECT: Cost Estimate on Board Member Service Awards Banquet
Per your request, I have developed a cost estimate for j'.
the proposed Board Member Service Award Banquet. This banquet
` woul 'cost approximately $11.00 per person which would include
the cost of the banquet hall meal, program printing and
invitation mail out. These prices are based upon the cost'
incurred for the TML Region~8 meeting hosted by the City in
January 1981.
Currently, we have 121 Board Members and 18 out going
Board Members who would be invited to the banquet. Assuming a
I° 651 turn out` we could expect approximately 91 member's to
I attend. Including Board Members, Cuncil, Staff and t>tieir
spouses we could plan on an attendancoe -'figure of approximately
209 'persons. The cost of this banquet would be approximately
i X2,299.
Cost of awards for this banquet would vary depending
on the type of award given. Formally drawn sheepskin j
resolutions would cost approximately 104 per person. Plaques n.
would cost approximately $45.00 per person.
Respectfully submitted,
{
r nge o
BA:mr
864SA
f a.
i
I
xP-[•~NKHnt •so- P>l1n Fn4,.:w FU.. a,.. y.._..~v
I
I 1
j
er
`r
DO NOT lr It l! THt~ SHEET
All
H6J~n THIS l~1LM: `
Ilk
mp
1
4 ; I
r
i
p#' fir:
a
I I
j
1
{
j
'i `V~1 y ter
.
.A:F Y A:bt . n.J. [ r.. . `''S J • . Y5 . J; .'t t aa:...,.-.: v^ ..,..n., . , ....ih
I
Y
i
AGENDA'
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON
July 15, 1980
BROADCAST LIVE ON KNTU RADIO, 88.5 F.M.
Regular Meeting of the City Council at 7200 P.M., Tuesday, July
15, 1980 in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at
which the following items of business will be considered. i
1
1. Approval of the minutes of the Reguler Meeting of July It
1980 and the Special Called Meeting of July 8, 1980.
2. Adoption of a Resolution of Appreciation for Elinor
Caldwell and David Speck for their many years of dedicat(J
service on the Library Board.
F..x
3. Public Hearings:
r, A. Consideration of issues involved in the revision of
the animal control ordinance.
4. Appearance by Vann Redman relative to his bid on excess
c` F Ciity property.
it
5. Ordinances:
A. Adoption of an ordinance amending planned developman! vF"
(PD-2) to permit the limited retail use on, the
southwest corner of the intersection of Coroni&' and
Bell Streets. (Adoption of this ordinance was omitted
in 1973.)
e. Adoption of an ordinance amending the zonino map of
the City of Denton, Texas, regarding the pet.tion of
Lindon H. Wilson for a change of zoning from
Multi-Family ONP-2" District to Neighborhood Service
r "NS" District on City Lots 17.1, 18, 19 and 19,1
(Z-14521 Lindon H. Wilson)
C. introduction of an ordinance instituting annexation
proceedings on approximately 6.2 acres of land located
' approximately 1,260 feet west of Interstate 35it,
beginning approximately 1,010 feet south of Zimmer
Motor Vans. (2-1451 Joe Belew)
i
111%
t
K
aL
.
j
City Council Agenda °
July 15, 1980
Page Two
6. Resolutionso,
A. Adoption of a resolution disposing of approximatel
6,165.65 square feet of land situated at the northeast
corner of the intersection of West Hickory and Avenue
E
B. Adoption of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to {
Execute for and on behalf Of .the City of Denton' one j
Electrical Power Line Crossing Agreement with the
Atchinson, Topeka and Santa Pe Railway Company. 1
7. Determination of Just Compensation for a .561 acre partial
tract of land and possibly an additional 301 acre tract of
land for the rerouting and construction of Paisley Street.
8. Approval of final payment to Jagoe Construction Company for ;
overwidth paving on Kings Row. E
9. Approval of Final payment to Pearcy-Christon, 1nc6 for
overwidth paving on Donnie Brae.
10. Approval of a contract with Alexander Grant and Company for
auditing services the 1979-80 fiscal year. js
11. Consent Agenda
E Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Stiff'
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authoriiis
the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in
accordance with the Staff recommendations.
E A. Bids/Purchase Ordersi
1. Bid #8763 Chain Link Fence at Waste Water
Treatment Plant.
2. Bid 18783 Purchase of Backhoe/Loader for use by
Water G Sewer Utility.
ti ~ I
i
firI ~r r
71
71
is
city council Agenda
t July 15 ► 1980 i
Page Three
12. Executive Sessions
s
' A. Legal Matters -Under Sec. 2(e), 1►rt. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. •
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f)► Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.9.
j c. Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art, 6256-17
V.A.T. S. rM, t
j 13. Consider Hoard Appointments s 1
V { t ~ ~
f li
k
t
i
E
ICY
i ~ wf
+ ` Ii t
6~k
k
V, V1 x
t k
t
isf.1
':q[. f.i 'I a`.'.1n . ~,i ' ~4: f"2~i^SS V.
T ,T
1 ~
r
23
i
City Council
f July 1. 1980
tegular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton at TOO p.a., Tuesday,
July 1, 1980 is the Caunatl Chamber of the Municipal Paildtng.
PRIBUT'v Mayor Staart, Mayor Pro Tom Taliaferro, Members Stephens, yel.s Jailer,
ae6 Hopkias3 City Manager Chris lutuae, City Attorney C. J. Taylor Lad
City Baretary Brooks Holt.
'
ASSMI Council Member Hensley
1. Motion vas made by Taltaferro, seconded by Staphems that the minutes ,
tar the Special Called Meettag of June 10, 1980, too Regular Meeting of Jane 17, I
1980 and the Bpeotal Called Meeting of June 24, 1960 be approved vitb a correction I
to the Jane 24, 1980 minutes to reflect that Mayor Stewart reappointed Miller
Dandle and Brody Mimic to the Denton Housing Authority. Motion carried.
FMC HgARMS1
(A) Mayor Stovart opened the hearing an 10-1450, the patitior of Mr.
Cf C. 0. Stebbins, requesting a change of sontag from agrlenltura' (A) to single
really (EP-131 ea a tract approximately 1/2 acre in also located along the south
side of Hdgbway 380 b4g1mU4 approximately 460 feet vast of the intersection
of Highvar 380 and Crisman Trinity Road.
' Trn spoke to favor add 3 to opposition. The opposition mentioned a
one-well eater supplr for several homes and nc aevarage.
The be••iag was Closed.
Jeff Meyer, Acting Planning and Comm,ulty Development Director, )I
stated %bat the teereet water line to approxiMtely 1,000' troy the site. The
dearest sever line is approximately 6,500' svey, and anocotoo of a sever lice
would require the idatallation of a lift Pation. He added that the P1-mtag l
and tomiag Coeaissiom felt that the propoott toning Classification to compatiblo
with surrounding uses and recomended approval by a vote of S to 0 vitb 1
abstentina,
Motion roe aide by Taltaforro, seconded by Yela that the petition i
be approved. Motion failed because a t/5 majority is rpuired,
(B) Mayor Btovart opened the hearing On 2-1411, the petition of Mr. I
ice Belw, reQUsttag Indexation of a 6.2 sort tract located ip"katoly 1,260
feat "at of taterotate 35V, beginning approximately 1,010 fait south of tiara!
Motor To".
NO ae spotm regarding the petition, so the hearing wu'closed,
,Fort Meyer, Acting Flaming end Cowumlty Development Director,
stated that ad May t, 1960 the Planning and toolag Comisaion approved the politico
of Mr. :04 3411V as folloval
(1) A change of toning frog agricultural (A) to light industrial
(6r) classification en a 2.4 acre Wool located along the
vest side of r-35W.
(2) Anaexatian and light iddustrtal (U) social on a 6.2 acre
treat loated approximately 350 feet vast at 2-3" contiguous
add vest of Ho. 1 above.
The 6.2 sere treat to this request to contiguous and vest of go. 2
above. The Plamiag add toning Cowaseton r6caraeads approval of t-1451.
Motion vas made by Hopkins, itcocded by Stephens that the petition
be apprnted. Motion carried udnatawaly.
(C) Mayor Stewart opened the beartag oa t-1441, the Petition Of Mies
Ural gash, requutiag as meaQmodt to a planned dovelopeast (pD) for detached
a ! single rally housing on 45 x 100 root lots, to peralt nultl family reetriated
(MP-R) development am a tract approximately T acres in stu. The praptrty is
located north at wiadeer Drive and begins approximately 125 feet vest of Stuart
Road.
After hearing 1 speak in favor and t in opposition the heartag was
aloud.
F
J
• 'i ~ 1
July 1, 100 Continued R
:off Meyer, Act! Planning mad Community
development as Director,
lying philosophy of the tverall developmenent was to locate i
the higher density uses on the interior with rimes@ to the Viadeor extension
add with sere lot lima development. The Pla^aing Commission felt that the
proposed amendment underclass this philosophy by sigalficaatly expanding the
high density development.
Motion vas made by Vela, seconded by Stewart that the petition. be
denied. Motion Idled with 3 toting against.
Motion vas then made by Taliaferro, seconded by Bapkiaa that tbo
petition be approved. Notion failed 3 to 3.
(D) Mayor Stewart opened the hearing oa 2-1.132, the petition of Mr.
Linden S. Vllson, requesting a change of sonlmg from multi family (My-2) td
neighborhood sarrl:e (BS) classification on S lots located between Collie!
Stroot add A•eaua D, beginning immediately north of Underwood Street add totaling
kproxlmately 1.1 acres. The property to nose particularly describes as city
lots IT, 17.19 15, 19, mad 19.1, Slock MA
After hearing L speak to favor but none in opposition, the hearing
was closed.
Jeff Meyer, Acting plaaming add Community Development Director,
stated thdt 18 letters were called with 3 returned in favor and coca in nppoeltiom,
mad that the ?lamming and toning Commission recommends neighborhood servioc (N)
toning only for lots IT.l, 18, 19 end 19.1 of Black 37aA. The original request
` included lot 17 whicb was deleted.
Motion vas made by Stephens, seconded by Vela that the petition be y. i
approved as recommended by the Planning and tomtag Commission. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. The Council considered an a uraeae
by L» Brinkley rsprasethe
Southeast Banton Beeldential Idetrvctio lonai Beater Advisory Council concerning
their request that the City provide for the operation of the Southeast bottom
Iastruotioeal Center.
Mr. BrtWoy staled that the Advisory Council of the southeast Denton
Iastruational Center is requesting that the City purchase the portable buildiag
located at peed Moore Park which haabt the Southeast Denton Buidihlial
instructional Center. to also requeeted that the City iisune-vespoasi'blity Oa
fineaeind the operation of the doctor under tile Pasha am Beareatioa Department.
Brickley advised that the Texas tducatiom Agwy funded a protran that will and
ma Tune 30, 1900
I" Mayor Stewart advised that the Couaeil could car refer the matter to
the 1.rkm and Recreatiod Board.
Motion as made by Stephens, aeoodded by Vela to rotor the matter to
She Parka add Recreation. Board for their recommendation. Motion carried unanimously.
t• The Council considered approval of the Capital Improvement plat.
(A) Planning 1 toning Commission, RecoometUtloai
Limit McAdams, Chairperson of the planning i toning Commission,
presented the reacanendatloas for projects under the Capital Improvisedts Plan,
Plaaoi geenddtoningECothe mmisston4witVarks ad h as Inventory Planning of Dstrs ais meet at rseoost-
ruction mad repaving. The Waste were divided into four categories as follow'
Priority 2-Beoewtructlon or overlay ndsded
Priority 2d60414struction or overlay mtelei
Priority ve overlay Table 222 -Overlay needed (hakadccaly r distrbs points)
The Plamatag and 9oaims Commission raaommtads the following projects for Inclusion
Is the fifth year of the Capital laprovenaet Plane
r. Sauthridge-fadgridge Drive area drainage
:1. 01savood-Mimtyv004 drainage
Colt S.reat at fiery end Cordell lrairsge
Reconstruation of sidealks
F
I
July 1, 1960 Continued 25
The Planning and lacing Cosmnisoloo reeotmande that the City Council call for a
bond election for the purpose of Providing revenue for reaoastruatioa overlay
' at all streets included in Priority 1, 2 and 3. The ?L=124 Cm do a rather
recaosads that the realignment of bell Avenue be a separate itea in the bond
elation.
Council Naberf caasaended Ms. MaAdaas and the ether isobars of the
planning and Easing Coealsslon for their efforts.
Dr. Marilyn Evelyn Huey, presldemt of TWU, advised the council that
the board at Regents of TWV bad agreed to donate adequate land for the ro-rcutlag
of bell Areout on the act Side of the University campnS. She asked that this
project be included in a bond issue.
Motion vas made by Stsphaa, seaocded by Vela to aaaopt the recaestieo-
dation of the planing sad Zoning Cosseisslon and mare toward vith poet Ntimatas
of Waste, Including the Nall Avenue and tbat s
pleas, be Council decide Vhether
to preesm the matter to the raters. Ibslos carried.
(b) Public Utilities lord Eecceasndatioor
Utilities Director Bob Salon Stated that to lfsr 91, 19604 !Le Public
ll D Utilities bard vas presented With the Updated Public Utilities live Year Capital '
iayroraaat plan and was briefed by the Utilities Departaeot start on its coatsatc. 01
The Plan covers the period of 1960 through 1965: The Utilities bard held a
public hearing an luxe 11, 1960, to receive coomeotc froa ditlseae regard!
Possible ranking at priarltial and/or additions or dilations to the PISA, to
oamest vas received fro the Airport board regarding the Installation of a 16"
Water line from saletiog facilities at the neW Peterbullt Plant am praatildn load
to the Destan Mualolpal Airport. After eateooive dellber►sloar'the utilities
Baird voted to briar tbt project torvard to 1963 tray the I"$. fiscal ream and
fund the overall* portion of the Ilse. Vilh oa tureber cosaeat_s Plan reoeiwd, With the
the
t Vsilitlea board voted to accept the live Year Capital l
aforeuationed a protected e
hangs lhd recommended that the Pied be to the Planning
and Soiled araissiaa. On June 230 19609 the planniag MA Wag dommilisian
't rwtWed the live Year Capital faprowNat Plan. After Wag briefed an the
various elwsts at she Pica, the Cordsoloa voted is accept the plan. {
that the tone Viaicomaalita ~SQ the stated ties board eek t gether an he capital ,
upravwat plans.
(lotion vu ends by Vela, aecoaded by btephou to approve the Wit
ties bard's recoasautloa. xWon carried usanimusly.
Counall molars praised the City aplaysas far doing as esatudat
job, follavirg a tour at city installations.
The Maasger thanked the Counsii for their remarks, addlag that It
masS wck to the aplarw far the council to Visit this.
3. CRDtHAHCH:
The lolloviag Ordinances wers prolamudr
(A) ORDTSASCE 10. 60-69
AN MtWCH OALLINO AHD ORDERIEO AS UACTIOS tO IS MA tS d'aH CM OF DWOH
TE
XAS of AVOUAT 9, 1960 to THH mm of SVHMISmo to TH 4UALYPIED ELECTOR;
or TEE Cm OF
W%rDDft SAAWYY OF $1r1P~PE MU M Mil PCE I PRO mOlin0" FOR POUM
PLACES, Vol1y0 MACBU=, ARD HOURS a V02M.
Motias vu made by Hopkins, seconded by Tallafarro that the Ordloaace
u passed. On roll call vote St*;besa "aye", Vela "aye", (alley, "Sys", Hopkins
"ayeTallaferre "aye" and It~ "ayc". Motion carried.
(E) CRDrit cx m 60.30
AS MnWICE PROMITUO THE PAR)= Of VEHICLES OH THE VEST IlDE OF A"M E
+ rRCN "M nffLISEC'MOH OF PRADtl STREET TO THH 1MTLISEC'MOR Of OM MtM AHD CS
I
t
i
1 ~ nun
i
• .L1
Jal.r It 1980 COWAUad
TIE FAIT MI Or AVM7 I nak TS DtTERSICTIOX Or UOU Dam TO In =MSECTMI
Of OAK l9M I AND fAORMT110 PAAM10 ON DOTE SrOM of NMI Ma D('AM fAOM
TU rMNSIMOE of tr? =un in normz ACAD To QIVKf am m (?001) MT
tons or SCarprmi nom m A simuruTY Cum, PA7PIDTI6 A y=rr ROT To
LtCIED TUO IUNDAID DOLLAASI AND UCLAMO Alf CrnaTM DATE.
Motion we made try ftoppppeu, ,oconded by Utley that the Oratoaaae
bt paned. On roll eau Tote Eopkina "eya", Vela "are", Oat2er "aye", Naphue
"aye", Taliaferro "aye" and Steven "are". Motion carried.
(C) oADMicy Ro. do-sl
AN cntwcz it TU CITY or LUTON, Mo. oltOomm An trMusam In W.
DM PIDU MOTS SPIED LDUT ON ILW40 AND MIS C4W TO ft TyOTT (20) $a=$
t m NMI PIOYTDINO A M4TY Of NOT TO 9xcM Tw W=W DOLLARS 02M,0011
MOM M A SVZWTLITY CLAUSSI An OtCLAAINO AN 012C TM DATE.
Motlon w, madd br Edpkia, eeaeadad by Tallaferro that the 0341""d
be paatad. on roll fal Me Osiloy""ayr", Nephene "aye", ttephlu "aye", Yale
Iwo , Taltaterre *aye* and St~t 06W, Notiom aarrtad.
(D) OAMNANCE 90. So-Da
AN ORDWAOn MMtNDINO RWAAAOIIAPN (C)(t) of s=oN 23-23 or TN! ODDS a
MWXS$ Of
1'/TD AANDELICTotat f M IIDDIAAAJ 1rOLf~t W PI It~AMTO = UM T ,O RNN of CMM
TO tMMU AND NAINTAII SUCK SYnMI AZMUP0 ALL MUANM tf COIn= pooM,
MM.
VM I AID DtCtANINO AN VfWTIYE DAT9,
Matlen we male by Ida, afaondod by Utley that tke OrdiOakea be
weed. on reu fail "to Stephan. "aye", rda "aye", Rephtde "aye", Utley
aye", Taliaforra "aye" and ItMA "aye", Notion ferried.
6. R1/OWTIONs
TM Caumetl efndWared appeord Of the fallowing Remelutidd autherleteg
the eigeiag Of " erCrdv agreauat with the. Toy" Departmeat of Rilb"ye AM
fublia Traafportattea for the eoutruction Of a Taal uAwan
AeeOLUTiON I
VRRLU the Citr of Denton dolirem the aoutructioa or a turnaround at eeparatt"
end lacideatal itmna on U.I. Interstate Mt and
WISIMS, the State of Tex", dating thre"k its state Dlghway ded r uto Tre,".
porutien Comolimice, hu agreed to partialwa vith the City of Deafen an thtd
profeott and
YKCWr the State of Tune reamlru that ell Couaeilpereono Of the City of D"Ifn
"loute an doom agreeme"t with the Nate for its
partlttpatlfnl
ROVI 1100 l'OIIt, tt n UWLVU by In CM CCUNCIt O In CITY of Do". =a,
TSATt
smog„ 11
It to the tateet of the city Couaail'of the city, at Deabea, Tuae to partte1p44e
vita the State Of Toy" in aeaatrufttny a tur""Amd at U.D. iNere"te in, ,
and ell Camatlpereow w hereby enthariged to u*Md original, of the attnah"
Eaarow Agreeenaat rdpulr"d br the Nate of Tout to table" thin puvpodd.
sIME.jja t
The sera of $430,300.00 to heroby appropriated to pay the caf% of Lhta adeatrwtioa j
i
project.
1~ON iii, 4
That thif Ruolutlad ebd2 take dtfeot tamodiately fro., and after it, padye
end eppraTal.
,
1 1
I `
r
27
;ar 1, 1960 Continued
P"MM AND un vu tbie the tat day of July, 19a0.
WEN 0. . MA
CfTY Or DaIr", TOMS
ArtfAT t
0OKI Nmf/l', CITY K=01
CM of DOD S. rwS
AMOVRD AS To LSOAL fORMO
C. J. TAYg JN., CITY ArroR1tY!
CITE Op DQIMI, TtxAS
1
Notion vies lade by Staphess, Seconded by Yela that the laaelutlan to~
~aSSM. on roll 41611 Tote Iopkigs "aye", Oeiler "aye", Tell "are". Itep to I
r~ erTalusferro "aye" and Stewart "aye". Mceion carried.
L` T. Motion we tieda by Sopkins, oeoogdd by Vale that final psy%out for
the putielpettou adreueat,vith finamial C0e4ulting 104.0 tot ov0e164 of a
vateriise 64 Stuart Noad U appr.wd in the count at !1,270 all reoaereeded b
the Utilities board. Notioa carried.
Q 4. Nation vas nade hr Odiloy, seconded by NoykinA that tidal payment to c;
011hert Atseeiates for the 1940 paver 6ubply Itudy he approved is the haunt
of 421642 as raoaaseodd ty the Utilities !tart. Nation s16rrid0
The aattor of a smosd Holt at TmOA was discussed. 1t v d pointed out
that Oilbert and Automates did not consider the @K=4 unit.
motion vat lade br Nopkins, smoaded by Wily that final payAeat for
the partietpattas alreeasat Vitt Iorth I MS 1tat41 Uaitercity for eteraiaf Of
vaterlide e4 Avenue C ad watt aid* of sanitary sovw relief lines to approved
u follove:
Cost at oversistad vattrllaa trod 12" to l6"...,. 11,120. T!
T!N of east of wbjeet sowar Had 7i.fS0.11 f
CMIS TOTAL CM...... $193,013.00
Noting carried.
10.. The Cousall aeaiderd approval of aaandaentd to Saaitattoo c4usatiea
polity to providt tot the ellaiestim of alley heat tiakuup.
fuhlie Narks Diraotor lick Svehla stated that ourrsdtly rokidatial
dar%gi it pt4koi up is apprufat161y lk alleys is the City. Tae prwtouo Ceumil y
had reoommaded S616ad"aiad the rata hued en otual urviee. for this round
sad bealuse of daaenveriag problw, aaiatwd4e ptablass and ofeatal elad%-4
prshlOod, the Staff te0ggAmd4 leiad to curhsida piohut t"iSntq AvW 1, too.
Notion Vol undo by Vales leeondad by hopk;s to approve sa"4agato to .
to the Seaitatim Cell"tias polity to provide for the eliaiS41,16e Of allay trash
piak-up. Noting earri6d.
11. The Council ocasiderM approval of psyr6at of adahership duet to the
North Tessa Comiuutea.
ASSistast City Manager Nang Cols advised that the forth Tatar Centleio
is d erpMUtioe so ptaets the North Twat Metroplat area,, that Dated bag
partiaipatM for lateral Vitro through the 144* eh red Scamaid Dewiep ooh
board lad Dalton bas oblalaM industry vith the aid at the )feria Taws Cowdisioo.
Not toil x1 dads hr Napkins , am6ada br T i&Grr6 to appeew payssnt
of tutorship duet to the North Tadas Caaisstoa is the omust dt 87,461. Notiea
aareiM.
,x
,
July 1, 1960 cottinued
12. COWMT AOMA,
j,
Sctita vu made by raja seconded br tepkiss that the Contest As411411
Ise a05T67ppipraatconesty Use lekup Truk moved as recommended by CakwiltKabor
kid
Galley. Motion carried.
(A) 124/PIIICUU OU A!
(1) lid 16766. 7" PVC pipe, vno awarded to the low Ladder,
Industrial faternatiaaal at t total bad prigs at 129,900, f01 bentoe.
(2) Purobaae Order 147746 to Rydre Ccadult was approved is the ~l
eanunt of 10,016.11.
. ,
"k
j '
(1) Atrchame Ores r4s921 to rol.llee neetrao was approved to
the am=% of 6,740. f
tl) PGTB
(1) rtsal plat of Oak lad ta0at44 Vol approved a reeauM44
W the Paanaind Lad tanlag Co-!solos.
(2) Paa.l plat o! lleok It /..Sand is tact Mctlaaer !Slat Addition
was approved u recomasded br the Plannlad and toelas Caeimeion.
was approved as rsooam-
(s) Waal leylat of the vi11a6 Pbau S.
ended by the Plaemint asd teatad Caaeisslan.
L1, the Ceuaoal aoaidaed Mda #5750-1 Led 18789'whioh were ran" train
the Coolant Alan" as tellms
(A) Motion was ad* by Why, 8400oded by Wiatarre that Sid 06770-1,
in4vstrial foldeer, Its 1~414 to Dectoa Cceearcial Printios at 16,211.50. Motion
carried.
1 (1) Matioa vas amt W 0ailay, s"caded br Taitaterro that 1!d 16765,
eeoneaty silo pickup, be award" to Denton Datauts is the count at 61,510. Matt"
earriod.
14. The Commit tinseled late taeautive Ieuaon at 10175 #.a, to disdAs F
1461 matters, real .state, personnel Wed `card rppolataeats.
15. The Causail reaosveaed into Publia Session at 1116 L.a., dnly 1, 1960,
(A) Motion vu made by toptta, soaemded by Vein to approve City
Mara of &arm"19 aealseliou of &ont daobadn for tooppOlstsk"t to tba Civil
$srvles Gaataeian, Motion'earried uataiae,uly.
(1) Motion vu made bI h4pbons, late" Ly V41a that Dwight Utley
Le aapolat44 to the Omerdeur Medical der.ieeL Advilory Ceunsl!. Molios earned
usaaaaeuslr.
(C) *ties was soda by Stephens, looeaded by Iola that lobe lavbea
raylaid dead fish" as the larth Taw tiaher ldmatien Autkarity. Notion oarried
IleatiAl ad,teurseQ at 1125 A.a., :4Y 1 1980.
e s
I
f
t
f
city Council
July 5, 1950
Special Called Joint meeting of the city Council and the Airport Advisory board
at 1100 p.m., Tuesday, July 5, 1950 in the Council Chamber Of the ltuniotPal
luiIdiat.
pITSTKT'i Cogaoilt Mayor btevut, mayor Pro Tom Taliaferro, KtAbere Oellay, Vela,
bopkins and 6tepbene; City manager Chris Hartwig, City Attorney 0. J.
Judi rWand City shalir Joha Carrrroll, Lee Keith and Chairman Gena, Wright.
ABSENTS Council lceaber Hensley
JOINT =110 Of TWH COVWCIL AND AIRPORT BOAADI
1. General discussion on the Denton Munioipal Airport. J
lilt Angola opened general discussion of the Airport.
Airport board Chairman Oene Wright advised that much improvement bad
been made. The Airport has great potential during the next 10 years. t
lopkiaa--Do we have a Waster Airport PSan1
Wright--Teo we do, such as designated areas for industry--k tend use ` f
plan. Development is being vorted on
I
i Airport Manager Tommy Jo ti-We have limited resources. We do act
have a control tower. We're working on obtaining adequate eater-studying the i
feesitility of a parallel runway.
a'
Vala»Are w working for addltioaal firms at the Alrportt
Jonas--We are negotiating with several fine. The Airport could be a
very good maintenance base.
TaliaArro--What do we do to interest business at the Atrportf
Joan--Tf we get utilities, better roads and other needs we could
attract, hopefully, maintenance time. PAA has put us on their priority list.
Vela»BaW we considered City building hangars to be rented!
Stewart--Hare we thought of lweoua Bondst `
i
Assistant City Manager King Cole-4 have talked to Prank Wedanieh
relative to revenue bonds. Xs advised that the City must generate revenue at
r the Airport first. f
Toliaterro--ls there a conflict with Aerosaltat
i
Wright--Hot !bat I know of. They do have most of the ramp spent. We
do deed a tdralnal facility and sore reap space, also a wareboua to leads.
The aerinultural lease xea diedusadd deg to reVmut from aro s and
whether the new lease will b• on big. The losses' its paid the City 11,050. A
long tern lads eight bd the bat route.
Mayor ttevart-When will we to Olt to apply for a great! 1
Jooee--We do need grant money to build an addition of 1,000 feet to
the runway and a water line. As to the groat, p don't know.
Dab Wth at Denton Aercomith suggested tbat lesstet it the Airport
bt allowed to review other contracts before they are assigned to sake sure that
all contracts comply with the "no mart favorable rule" at coctrat terms. fir.
Smitb euggaitsd that be probably would contest a contract new beige reviewed.
Tallafarro--Oa what grounds would you pretest!
Baith--It is my contention that the contract allow for PBO, but on
a caller and laid expend" scale than Vail required of Aerosmlth, Be also
c suggested to preview contracts could eliminate future problems and passible
protests of contract terms. Smith requested that leneas be invited to the Beard
j
C y, I r
i
II ;
f
1
I
July 8, 1980 Continued
IODTM Or TNF. CITY COU1CIta
1• The Council considered approval of a contract with LWrw to conduct a
review of the data processing financial applications.
Director of Finance Bill NoRary stated that on June 3, 1980, the City
Council approved a request for a proposal to be Issued for reviewing data process.
ing financial applications. This request had bean developed in response to a
reeammandatiom by Alexander Grant and Company, the City's Auditors, and in resp-
ones to the past to revise many of the City's current financial applications.
The staff vorked with the Data Processing Citizens Advisory Board tree the Incept-
ion of this project to formulate this approach. In response to issuing the
request for proposal, the City received e proposals from time interested in
} assisting the City in this review. The proposals were submitted to an intensive
review by a at% member committee composed of a member of the Data Froceesing
Citizens Advisory Board, the City Manager, the Assistant City Manager, the
Director of Data ?"coastal, the Director at Utilities, sd the Director of i
finance. From the eight proposals submitted, the Committee requested three tires
t0 SAM further oral pre4614014as. As a result of those prlseatatiooa, LM
vas selected so the tier to parfom the project. LWYV has proposed a revive of
the financial applications of the City tar a profeosiooal too of $35,000 and
azpensse not to exceed 42,500. Tae proposal additionally includes a review,
for 270000, of other data procetsia~ applications for the purpose of providing
muugmsnt information and Assisting the City in betianing A comprobonstre data
processing planning process. Included in their approach, LVPW proposes to F '
include a review of the managment information requirements of the City and the
data processing. Although this effort was not included witbin the scope of the
Critical RPP it was determined that the reviw would be appropriate and desirable.
The most eft1cisat scans of accomplishing this toot would be to incorporate it
within the review of the financial system.
Talieferro--What are the weaknesses and whet are vet h' ,1
fling to sllmisaNt
McBary--We need to make revisions in accounts receivable. We bare s
difficulty with consumption records. One problem In meter reading is tbat we
!
must have a readied for every routs before billing. We need to modernize.
City Manager Nartung-All studies, oilbert and Associates, Alesaadar
Grant and Touch* Rosq made a mote of the need of extensive revisions.
Notion wu made by Stephens, seconded by Vela to Approve a contract
with LM to oendxt a review Of the data Preeessiag tiaannial Lpplieatiou as
rscommeaded by the staff and Data processing Citizens Advisory Board. Motion
carried.
2. The Ceumoil considered sdcptien of an ordinance
coatinuanea of Ad Valorem taxation on automobiles. prortdiag for the
The following Orllun_e was presentede
ORDI1U11C! no, 80-33
AN ORDULMN Or Tffi CITY OF DENTONI TB WO MOVIDINO too TBR C08TZI(UAUCt Of AO
VALORCM TAXATION 08 ALL AV MOBILES THAT A FAMILY OR INDIVIDUAL OV18 AND DOW NOT
BOLD OR WX ION PRODUCTION OP M M I AND PROVIDINO AN 07pCMYt; DM. j(
Notion vas Bads by Talleferro, seconded b~ Noikine that the ordinance 3
be passed. On ro roll 0411 vote Vela "Nye"j 8tephecs aye , ostler "aye", Noptiu
aye and Stewart are . Notion carried unanimously
3. The Council considered roeommandatlon for the selection of an engineering
consultant for the NcXinney Street bridge project.
City &tlaser dreg Ndwarda advised that the staff received 12 proporalf
from the iaitiai RFP mailout, Then Vera rsdtned to 3 time that were intervieved
f at Jute 26. The staff reviewed ell comments and recommsods Rady A Associates.
Osiiey--What Vero choices Oyer local eagicaertcg firmel
Edwards--Local firm dots business out of Macesota,
E;
I
~n
nt
i
lot',
r wk
.
July 8, 1980 Continued
Both Mayor strvart and Council Member Vela stated that preferential
treatment of local time would soon result to no contract proposals from any other j
firm. t`
Motion was made by Vol*. seconded by stevart to hire Rady and Assoc-
fate as consultants for the McKinney Street bridge project as recommended by
the staff. Motion carried unanimousiy. '
4. The Council considered statue report on the proposed animal control
ordinance. i
Assistant City Manager King Cole belefed the Counall, suggesting public
hearings for citisen input. No also suggested that the following issues be
considireas
A City registration of pets
B)) Limitations on pats per bouseheld E
C) Recognition of cat population
D) Impoundment and euthanasia procedures R
s Oraduatsd impoundment fees
y) Animal ado ties "
021 Headline of exotic aslnals
I „t
1 s ?A
Pat auismncprocedures
W Jurisdiction of Animal Control Officer
Margaret Oran who eow;1lod the informatian above said that aitisona
must he educated relative to an ordinance, Cheri !s need to put tooth in animal k
control ordinance enforcement. She added that she has obtained saimel control
oroismaces from several cities for study.
Motion was made by Tslieferro, seconded by sophism to cell a public
hearing on July 15 or as soon as passible. Motion carried. t
5. The Couoail considered approval of an Wasmsst with Oolden Triangle
Mall to refund any excess funds for the Tests V-Turn construction at Loop Z55
and I.35.
Motion was made by Rophlne, seconded by Taliaferro to relsive a obeok for
1438,300 from Ooldee Triangle Mall to finance Texas U-Turn construction of ttiey 268 t a ,
and 1.31, with left over funds to be refunded. Motion carried uaanlmewly.
The Council rec4@046 into berutirl Beesion at 1Or45 P.R. to discuss
Segel matters, real state, personnel and board appofatmoatm. I~
7. The Council reconvened into public session at 11$55 F.S.
3•
Notice was made by Oailty, seconded by Tallaferro"to appoint Jim tlbeeler
and trod Patterson to the Ristorical Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 11159 P.M.
i
TTY EBC ARY 1
i
i e m e
.
t
I
I
1{II
1
{
THE STATE Ot TEXAS RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION
COUNTY OF DENTON Ot ELINOR CALDWELL
CITY OF DENTON +
vnREAS, ou behalf of the poople of the MIX
Denton, TekaY, the members of the on
Pubiia Libr[eg Board of the City of Denton,
Texas desire to publolrr express their
sincere gratitude to EL NOR CALDWELL for
bar valuabla ppubiid service am a member 4f
the Denton Publie Library Board; acd 3
VAEREAS, the members acknowledge with grateful '
appreciation the many hours of service,
riven toward this board;
NOW THEREyORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on behalf of the citizens
she has served so well, the members of the
Denton Public Libraryi~ Bard direct and order
that a copy of this 8eeolution be forwarded to
the laid ELINOR CALDWELL, to a token of our
appreciation,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of July, A.D. 190
0.
AICHM 0. SMART, MAYOR
CITY OF DZNTON, TEXAS
9
i
ATTEST:
, i
CITY of DENiOk, TEXASR A 7
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL tORNt
CITY IMME
CITY OI II6NSON, TEXAS
1
' t I
a rr ~ .aM~rV v xp 1^X4
t
Z
I
THE STATE OF WAS RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION
COUNTY Or DENTOX Or DAVID F. SPECS
` CITY Or DENTON
f 1fdEREAS, on behalf of the people of the City of
Denton] Texas, the members of the Denton
Public Library Board of the City of Denton,
Texas desire to publicly express their
sincere gratitude to DAVID P. SPECK for
his vilaable'ppublic service aI a member of
the Denton Publie Library Board; and
WHEREAS, the members acknowledge with rateful ;
a appreciation the many hours ol service given
toward this board)
J '
Now THEREFORE, BE IT MOLVED, Cast on behalf of the oitimehs
he has served so well the members of the Denton
Public Library board Atract and order that a
copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the said
DAVID F. SPECK, is a token of, our appreciation.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of July, A.D.1980.
RIIHARD I~ CITY Or DENTON, TUA8
h I
X51 "
I
ATTEST:
i :
l
.
C1TY Or 0C470NCITY-WRETART
, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEM rORX4
A_
CiTV Or aBNTON,'TE7US
f" I
i
i
t I
~t .4
i
~1
'wfl'~~µ~t e' J.
1
CITY OF DENTGii
MEMORANDUM
TOt Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROMt King Cole, Assistant City Manager t
DATEt July 3, 1980
SUBJECTS Animal Control Ordinance
The staff was instructed by the Council to exdmine our existing j
animal control ordinance, we have pursued this in two wait. We
surveyed area citWs to investigate and compare' their ordnances
and procedures to our own, Secondly, we not with interf'at
groups In the community to solicit Input on proposed changes.
Letters were sent to area veterinarians, physiciana, kennel
owners, breeders and members of the Humana Society,
In contacting area cities, we found that most were beginning to
realize the effect of the animal population by adopting more
stringent ordinances and becoming more involved in educating the
community about their responm1bilities.
The staff then compiled a list of proposed changes from the
aurvey and oteir problems facing our City, This list 'via
presented to community interest groups and their comments were
solicited, The minutes from those meetings are attached,
Me would like to receive as much oitisen input as possible on
this ordinance. The next phase will be to set up a series of
public hearings over the next few weeks.
i
ng !
xCtja +
Attachment
f.
1
try
1
rf .h+t ;a•)v ~a~may.,
i
I
City Registuation of Pets
presently, the veterinarians in the City hold the
only identification and data on animals. The City has no means
of data retrieval on pets except through the veterinarians.
City registration provides centrality and a more direct apprbach
to identification of lost or vtray animals, while at the same
time gives a better knowledge o the animal population.
2. Limitation on Pats Per Household
The limitation on the number of pets per household is
a policy that a number of cities have instituted. Some of the
reasons theme cities list for this policy is that it curbes the
population explosion, allows those pets to receive more care,
and minimizes the chance of a neighborhood nuisance, (i.e.
cleanliness and noise).
3. Recognition of the Cat Population
Historically, tho cat population has been the silent
pet In relation to the dog. However, cats can present the same
situations that dogs have. In terms of rabies alone, cats are
potential carriers.
4. Impoundment and Euthanasia Procedures
presently, the animal control ordinance states that
any animal in violation of the ordinance may be impounded. This
includes animals running at large, not currently vaccinated, or
suspected of rabies.
Impounded large animals are held for three days and
if not claimej will be advertised for sale within tan days. All F
animals not sold will be painlessly destroyed.
Small animals are held at the animal shelter for
three days and cot claimeds will be shed is os dl of painlessly.
This has been the p
II
s. Graduated Impoundment Fees
The present impoundment fee is five dollars 05) per
day for the feeding of large animals and one dollar 01) for
r advertising each large animal, For any animal of the canine
species the impoundment fee is five ($5) and a feeding charge of
one dollar. These fees were established in 1959.
The graduated fee is an increasing fine for each
offense within a twelve month period.
kw~
i
i
1-11 10
l
b. Animal Adoption
i
At this time the City does not offer animals for
adoption. This practice was discontinued a number of years ago.
7. Handling of Bxotio.Ar.imals
Exotic animals are considered to be undomesticated
animals that have a natural instinct for the wild, Example of
such animals include panthers and snakes. At %his time, the
animal control ordinance has co provision for the keeping of
exotic pets.
S. Quarantine Procedures
suspected of rabies, the ordinance
,
if an animal is
states that the animal is to be quarantined in a vetRrinary
establishment at the owner's expense. The animal must remain
confined for six (6) months or until the City Health Officer
approves release in writing. if after reasonable effort the
owner cannot be located, the animal will be humanely destroyed.
As of January 1 _o; this yerr, the State of Texas
passed a new house bill governing quarantine. These rules, will
have to be incorporated into the animal control ordinance of
benton.
9. Pet Nuisance
The present ordinance declares a nuiciance as ary
frequent or long continued noise that disturbs tho comfort and
repose of any person of ordinary sensibilities' in :he immediate
vicinity. The ordinance roes not address air pollution from ~
owners that do not clean and sanitize their pet's environment
and its effect on neighhors.
100 Jurisdiction of the '6nimal Control Officer
The ordinance doer not address the. jurisdiction of
the Animal Control Officer. The ordinance does define "at
large", but does not give the officer t'~ right to enter, the
precisos of' the owner. rot instance, the animal that `is iyitty ,
in the front yhrd unleashed and not behind a wall of sufficient
containment. j ,
F
x,
y
1
i
r
SPECIAL MEETING ON PROPOSED ANIMAL
CONTROL ORDINANCE
5e00 P.M. City Alan gear's Conference Room
7RESENT: Jim Baird$ Debbie Shelton, ring Cole and Margaret
Green
I
The representatives of the Humane Society were very much in
favor of City registration of animals. This is also endorsed by
the Humane Society of the United States, Debbie Shelton stated
that the registration should be utilized in conjunction with the
impoundment fee.
The Humane Society has no position on the limitations of the
number of animals per household, However both members present
were opposed,
•
f..
Baird and Shelton felt that cats need to be under the same
restrictions as dogs, They especially emphasized registration
and health requirements,
Shelton voiced opposition to the length of time between
impoundment and euthanasia, she felt that five days was much
better, This is also endorsed by HSUS. Both members are also
in favor of bottled carbon monoxide to euthanize animals.
The next Item addrsd was b ircoupled nhewithwere in favor of~the gradu tad too animpoundment aul!
a fee reduction for spayed and neutered
animals. It was felt that this would ioster°proper animal care
and out down on the Incidence of unwanted stray animals.
The Denton Humane Society is in favor of reinstituting animal
adoption from the Animal Shelter. They are of the opinion that
it will reduce the number of animals euthanized, Also,- they
feel that it will promote the spaying and neutering of animals.
!
Shelton and Baird feel that exotic animals should be prohibited
as pets, This is also endorsed by BSUS. However, they feel
that a grandfather clause should be allowed,
The representatives feel that the quarantine procedures are
adequate coupled with the provisions in House bill 1323,
J
S
e
I
i
.c"ar~Y1.. y...I :r a r. ,.:,,,,...e. .
}
Animal Control Ordinance Meeting
April 14r 1900
Page Two
The issue of pet nuisance was the next toppic of diacuesion.
Shelton felt that odor and cleanliness needed to be lnclOded
under this section.
The group had no opinion on the jurisdiction of the animal
control ordinance,
Shelton and Baird Indicated they would like to see Note
enforcement on small establishments, such as R-Mart, that sell h
animals, Also they felt that the name "Animal Shelter" was not ;
appropriate because the City does not shelter animals.
1
Meeting adjourned at 6e40 P.M.
i
1
i
i
4
,
V
SPEOIAL MEETING ON PROPOSED
ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
April 16, 1980 ;
5100 P.M. City Manager's Conference Room
h
PRESENTS Dr. D. R. Dyal, George Schneider and Margaret Groan
t On the issue of city registration of pets, Dr. Dyal and George i
Schneider felt that City registration was very important. # I
However they felt that its effectiveness would only be realised
it linked with a graduated impoundment fee and proper
enforcement of the ordinance. No concensus was formed on the
method of registration.
Item number two was a discussion of the limitation on the number
o[ pets per household. Both Dyal and Schneider felt that this
would be met with opposition by pat owners. They also felt that
other cities that have this provision might help' us come to a
decision about the mean number of pets that a household could
rationally cars for. Dr. Dyal gave an example of one of his
client's that had twenty cats and that the client cared vary
well for each anneal. Both felt that this was a difficult item
for a city ordinance to deal with and that perhaps the health
~
office could probably handle it better. t
George Schneider felt that cats needed to be included in every
provision that dogs were. Or. Oyal stated that cats are not the
roamer: that dogs are if properly cared or and spayed or
neutered. However, both expressed the need for cats to be
recognised as are dogs if only for their rabies potential.
Both Schneider and Dyal felt that the impoundment and euthanasia
procedures were more than adequate.
The group, was very much in favor of the graduated impoundment
fees especially with a provision for a reduction in charge for
spayed and neutered animals, Oyal stated that animal ownership
is a privilege and not a right. Schneider felt that the i
graduated impoundment fee would prov* to be a deterrent to i
owners that allow their animals to roam and th!refore enforce
proper pat ownership. Both stated that this should be linked to
~
animal registration. Schneider stated that it an animal was
registered and impounded, the owner could be charged whether or
not the animal was claimed, because the City would have proof of
ownership.
s
j
a;
1
t
Animal Control Ordinance Meeting
April 16, 1980
Pay! Two
Schneider and Dy41 ware opposed to re-establishing animal
adoption. One reason was that people adopt animals only, to save
them from death and than release the animal to roam. Another
reason was that the animal shelter should not be in the practice
of adoption because of the administrative cost and expertise
needed to find proper owners,
Both Schneider and Dyal felt that the quarantine procedures were
fine is Is, However, both voiced opposition to the home
quarantine adopted by the state. They suggested the staff flight'
want to study the issue.
i
The issue of pat nuisance was 'discussed with no conclusion, It
was agreed that noise was a perception of each individual and
difficult to enforce.
Dr, Dyal and Mr, Schneider felt that the attorneys need to
establish the jurisdiction of the animal control officef,
The closing made by Dr. Dyal and George Schneider were that
enforcement would be the key to a successful ordinance,
Meeting adjourned at SiSS P,M.
s.
i
4t:
t
r~
I
1
{
t
SPECIAL MEETING ON PROPOSED '
ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
April 17, 1980 ;
300 P,M. City Manager's Conference Room
ti PRESENTS (City) Lil Davis, Tillman Oland, Rick Mi11er~ King
Cole, Margaret Green, Burt Solomona, Howard Wattal
(County) Jim Legerri, Loreto Knox
The representatives from the City and County felt that City
registration of animals was justifiable, Chief Miller felt that
It would provide a revenue source, Xing9 Cole stated that it
would not be done as a revenue source, The question came up as
` to what use registration would have, Lil Davis felt it would
help the animal control division in Identification of the
animals brought in. The County rspr a ernt&tlves;felt it would
help in getting some indication of the animal population in the
' City, E
In the issue of the limitation of pets per household, Burt
Solamono felt that it should be a Council decision, The group
voiced no strong feelings pro or con.
In terms of recognizing the cat
population, Lii Davis stated. s
that education was one of the best ways of handling cat owners,
It was the concensus of the group that cats have the same E
enforcement policies as other animals, i
The group felt that the impoundment and euthanasia procedures
were adequate.
The group was in favor of the graduated impoundment fee coupled
with a program for spaying and neutering animaia, It was felt
to be a great deterrent, Soloaons, although in favors warned
against fees that wets excessively high,
It was the eoncensus of the
group that excels animals be
prohibited, Jim Legerri stated that for most exotic snlmals no
vaccines had been discovered and therefore these animals could
post problems in terms of disease control, Also most exotic
animals are wild in nature and tend to attack even the owner,
The group felt that the quarantine procedures wore adequate.
i
y
e
p
,'yy
-
wool
1
Animal Control Ordinance Meeting
April 17, 1900 j
Page Two
I
The group was in agreement that the pet nuisance section should
be revised, Rick Miller sugggested that a petition of three
psrsons that lived or worked in close pro-Amity of the pet, owner
#n question would help in identifying and eradicating the
roblem. The group saw this as a viable solution to an i
increasing complaint on noise as well as odor and health.
The jurisdiction of the animal control officer was discussed at
some length, Chief Miller asked Lil' Davis how this was handled }
in animal control, She stated that presently animals are dyt
picked up if they are lying idle in a yards' However, this
conflicts with the definition of "at-large" in the prssont
ordinance, Burt Solomons stated that thij attorney's off ce had
problems with officers entering the premises to impound
animalsa The attorney's office felt that entering the promises
constitutes trespassing. Solomons stated that he,. had done
research on the issue and that perhaps impcur~dinq from the front
yard would be legal but not from the back or $idea Chief killer
stated he would draw up a policy on the matter and' give' the
animal control officoir- the right to at least issue citations, i
Salomon& wanted the Chief to delay the policy until the
ordinance was approved,
Meeting adjourned at 4151 p,M.
i
~ f
I
i
i
a II
,
3
I I
i
("I
i
July 15, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
j
SUSJECTt r
Consider Sale of 1/2 Acre of Water Department Property Near
willow springs Road on Dallas Drive.
SUMMARYt
Dr. Redman, owner of the property and building improvements
located at the northeastern corner of the 'intersection of
Dallas Drive and willow springs Road, has submitted a bid to I
pl'rchase subject 1/2 acre tract of Water Department
property. This property was purchased by the iikk
Department in the 1940's for use as a wall site. A, test well
was drilled there, but the site proved to be inadequate fora
well; therefore, the Utility staff has expressed that the
property can be deolared surplus.
j - The City Attorney's office had an appraiser give a
' preliminary opinion, as to the value of the property. A
{ single bid for the property was received w ioh wag
approximately one-half the price determined by the
preliminary opinion. The Public Utility board reviewed this
and rejected the bid because of the low bid price.
i
f
{ I
~f(y 1 I V ~
e~ t
,'All
A; . •m ,asi4~is'd.. 4Hd;p:.. A. r..n'e'f!n..nr G'c...,. .
6
1 ~ 1
fl
1 ~
111' • I
1 I 2T8 ~
H t ;1
11I 11 Y; 13~ . 1 i.1.
n1^ I E
\ I f I {
/ ,11 p
- ..+v'w.a..~~ ' •~f. 111 , I ~ !
\ X79 : . i 1
its I c1; A I .SIAM WC`~ k:
I 1 \ ~ -
k \ :I
cog"
1
t 1
283
r..,.._ _ CITY OF' lEN'1'ON, TEXAS
r } •
i
I
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETINGS July 1, 1980
AGENDA ITEMS Hid 08783, backhoe Loader
SUMMARYt
This bid is for the purchase of a backhoe loader to be used by
the Water 6 Sewer Department as a replacement for tnotorpool unit number 6165. „
The bid of Trinity Equipment on a John Deers 310A dote not meet
specifications. The transmission is a direct drive type instead of the
torque converter we requested, it does not have the over center transport
position we prefer. The tires are smaller than the specifications require
and a security lock up kit, engine side panels and noise supression kit are
not available. A
The bid of Dentex Ford,$Aj 091,001 for A Ford model $55 does
meet specifications, however, the bid of Solain Equipment , $26,691.00 for
a Long Model 5N1 is only $600.00 higher for a larger, heavier piece of
equipment.
Ford 355 Long 5N1
Engine Net Norse Power 55 75
Transmission 4 speed 10 speed I
Bucket capacity 7/8 yd, 1 1/8 yd.
Rear tires 17.5 x 24 6ply 18.4 x 24 x 8 ply
Front"axel capacity 10,000 Iba. 12,000 lbs, "
Digging depth 149511 is,
Operating weight 12,300 1bs. 14,520 lbs.
Delivery 90-120 days 30 days
The Long tractor has the capability of a crane being Added at a
later date without interfering with the loader/backhoe.
Both bidders are located in Denton and have the facilities to
service the equipment.
FISCAL SUMMARYt
The funds for this purchase will be divided between two accounto.
The motor pool replacement fund, 06-00-87-07 will pay $12,060.00 and the
using department , 04-61-91-04 will be charged the balance of 140'631.00.
('this unit will replace a 1974 model backhoe, total purchase price $1),400.004)
ACTION AEQUIREDt I
Approval by council,
1
1 Wr~
r
Page 2
Memurandutn
ALTERNATIVESt
1. Approve bid as recommended by staff.
2. Accept the smaller lighter machine offered by
Ford for $600.00 less.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONSt
We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated and
most responsive bidder of Bolain Equipment for the Long SNl in the amount
of $260691.00. We feel the larger$ heavier equipment$ and shorter delivery €
time is the beat buy for the City of Denton. This purchase has been t?lroughly
and extensively evaluated and discussed by all departments involved i.% the
purchase, maintenance and operation of this piece"of equipment.- The Purchasing
Department and the Vehicle Maintenance Department all coneure on this re-
commendation,
EXHIBITSt
Tabulation sheet,
Tom D Shaw, C.P.M.
Purchasing Agent
TD5/lc
r'
I
I
y r7
to tj
~ d d
x.947
3.1
yF O 1
pp~~ N
H
l
14
a
c o b~ ,
8
~J LA
~ro
G
i
g
1
T
e
nr»xNeY.P~rrr~ifry'.`»:V+•ti'.xWl .ch{.:r
as
k
t
[{l t Yf
I jI ,1
J
CITY OF DENTON F
MEMORANDUM
" DATE: July 10, 1980
TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager „
FROM: Charles Watkins, Development Review Planner
SUBJECT: Amendment to planned development (PD-2) to t
permit a limited retail use at the southwest
corner of Coronado and Bell Streets, (The r !
Ordinance will be available at the City Council
meeting.)
,irk
The procedure for establishing a planned development (PD)
zoning district generally involves a two-stage review s' yt
process including first, approval by the City,Council`of
the basic land use plan and secondly, review and approval
by the City Council of a detailed site plan. After #
City Council approval of the basic land use plan', an
~s
ordinance is drawn up by the City Attorney and adopted
by the Council. After approvat of a detailed site plan,
the site plan is filed as part of the ordinance.
Planned development (PD) zoning for a tract between
Ball and N. Locust Street was originally approved on
February 24, 1920 by Ordinance No. 70.8, permitting a
townhouse development.
j On April 3, 1973, after receiving a recommendation from
the Planning Commission, the City Council voted to approve `
an amendment to planned developmc:" (PD-2) permitting a
{ limited retail use on a tract within the original planned
r ` developpment located at the southwest corner of Coronado 4.
and Be11 Streets, this action on the ppart of the City
Council was for approval of the basic land use lsn, t
owever no ordinance was ever adopted to permit the
limited retail use. a
After receiving the recommendation of the Planning Com-
mission, the City Council on April 11 1919 voted to s
approve a detailed site plan for the limited retail
5 f section of planned development (PD-2), The Planning
Y
r ,
>S
1
E
1
Commission recommendation to the City Council on the site
plan included five (5) conditions as follows: j
1. A building setback of ten (10) feet shall be
observed from the western property line.
2. The trees shall be planted as indicated by the
` modified site plan. The area indicated as green
space will be planted with grass. Also, a low
hedge shall be planted immediately in front
of the parking area on the east'side of the
property and at the end of the parking lot on
the west side of the property.
3. The dumpster shall be located as indicated on
site plan, and a 6' X6' wall enclosure shall
be built on three sides of the dumpster. A plan
for the enclosure will be submitted tothe Building
Official to ensure the proposal is compatible with the dumpster vehicles.
4. The building walls indicated on the elevation I
plan will be of masonry construction.' There
will be no detached signs permitted. All %tons
will be located on the building.
5. The uses permitted in the building will be
neighborhood service in character, such as a
convenience' store, and other Small retail and
office uses. A restaurant or club is not permitted.
However, city records only reflect two (2) conditions as
follows:
` i
A. A building setback of ten (10) feet shall be
observed from the western property line.
B. The trees shall be planted as indicated by the
' modified site plan. The area indicated as green
space will be planted with grass Also, a
low hedge shall be planted immediately in front
of the parking area on the east side of the
property and at the end of the parking lot on
the west side of the property.
As the Council may recall, the City Council considered an
amendment to the site plan for the limited retail section
V on June 3, 1986 to permit the installation of ggasoline
r - pumps and a canopy. The City Council denied this petition.
The failure to adopt an ordinance permitting the limited
retail use in 1973 essentially renders the retail section
of planned development (PO-2) void.
{
r
~ I
e
t" §
all
i
e
3
P
In the opinion of the City Attorney, two alternatives for
resolution of this problem are available (see attached memo.)
1. The City Council can proceed to pass an ordinance
zoningq the property for neighborhood service
district uses in accordance with the recommendation
of the Planning Commission dated Julyy 18, 1979o
which would exclude the sale of gasoline.
2. If consideration is to be given to permitting F
the sale of gasolinethen a new zoning case
should be initiated by the property owner.
i
Both Boyd and John Morrison were advised of the two
alternatives available to them and have decided to select
~ w
the first alternative described aboWat this time.
Exhibits: I. City Attorney's Memo
It, Detailed Site Plan of Cimited:.Retdil
Section of PD-2
A. Ordinance 070.8 and accompanying tat. {
B. Plat in case file with cross hitched land
uses.
C. March 7, 1913 Planning 5 Zoning tommission
Minutes.
t 0. `April 3 1973 City Council Minutes,
E, July l8, 1979 Planning b Uniog Commission
Minutes.
F. August 7, 1979 City Council Minutes.
0a Site Plan approved August 7, 1979.
H. City Council Backup.
f
i
E
j
i
k
611
KAI
1
F awl
i
i
3
r
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 13, 1980 ck
T0: Chris Hartung, City Manager
Jeff Meyer, Commisnity Development
,Charlie Watkins, Communtty Development
FROM: C. J. Taylor, Jr,, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Neighborhood Retail Zoning on tract of land at
Bell and Coronado Street.
Attached are two memorandum's dated June 10, 19801,, with
attached documents, showing the history of this zoning case.
TTheFeb property was originally, zoned for a townhouse development
pry 24, 1970 by Ordinance No. 70.8.
After receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commisslon
the City Council on April 3, 1973 voted to rezone the c6rner of -
Bell and Coronado to a small retail shopping complex," but City
records do not reflect that an ordinance was ever ppassed zo~ing
this property for retail uses, The property is sti11 zoned for
townhouse development under Ordinance No, 70.8.
i It is m judgment that the City Council can proceed t' abe an
ordinance zoning the property for neighborhood sarvice .dist'rict
uses in accordance with the recommendation of the "Plannin
Commission dated July 18, 1979 which would exclude the sile'of
i gasoline; howover, if consideration is to be given ' to
permitting the sale of gasoline, then it should he anew toning
case before the Planning Commission with proper notice given to
the adjoining property owners.
I
The property owner should be advised of this so he can.decide
' if he wishes to accept the limited zoningg or raq6st a new
hearing before the Planning Commission and the City Council,
` i
T
fi+r C1T ATTORN9
CJTJR js `
A
~Ra
4
,
~ r
k_ i
icf'.. 44-0
a p, 1
62 Nk
0. A
4y
Z
[rr--,. ;Ai
,t
46
~r i' ~nl ti U I t ~
t 1 4
1 '
[tit
i
1 r
.
ra_ S
.rA
'IV
i
f
J ~H fa 'E~.ir r ~ f
. s TOW
• ORpINAtiCB AMBNOINO THE tONINO MAP Or TtlS.CI'!Y Or DSNMC2 TBYAR♦
Ag RSAM Dr WAS ADppTRD AS AN APPSNDIX TO TRR CODS OY OApINANCBR Of i
BY OADINANCR NO. 69-1r AND. As SAID IltA3P5 +
THE CITY or DBNTON, TRXARi
APPLIES TO CRS INPIC~IAL TAX NO or 'PARTICULARLY CITY OT ODMOV1 r TR%Ai, .AND
9SOWN ON
MORE PARTICULARLY Dxcx)IL TAX PLAT INCOAYOPATRD TElRRRIN/ AND DX
CwtNO aN RF►RCTM DATR. R810T8Y OP."St {
TRSAR,
COUNCIL Ole TNR CITY OF DSNTON,
y
RtCT1ox I. Teaser &4Optad
I(a Of the City of Deatac,
That the Ronloq p
14, 1969, as +n•APPendix to the Code of Ordinances o! the
January S
ioas of Ordinance No
city of Denton, T4xb, under the provie.
3e, and the sass is hereby,amsnded as lollowss
hss h tar dssoribed Property is hereby remaved
All the
4
from the •sY-7' single Family District as shown on Said Boning
Nrp, and all provisions of ordinance No. 64-1 adopted the 14th
day of Jenuery, 19i9~ as monded, shall herealtAr apply to raid
!
Property as '►D' Ple District aoaOrdieg to, and
aned
conditions and requirements, and to the Plat,
rpb3e C! t0, the 6elow fN, and being
attached hereto and made a Part hereof for allPc N1 e!
generally dasoribed as all tAat certain iol, tract or kncwa
and County at D4ntos, Saxar,
E land situated in the City
hot 1 of city Slook 135 as shown this data on the anted mll@
City i being
and the official Tax Map of the City of Denton, Texas
the name property dNerd in tsetse and bounds on the attaohad p1e6
(located between se 11 Aeon" and NortF Loons! !lnetl, which con-
nlreme0ta are as WIWI, 1
6leione and "4
,
othir rtru0t«re rha11 be conetrneted on
No building or in end en t
or across existing lot lines shown On the attached P
he front
future replatr, nor be 010141 than t, We and rear yard i
69-11.
Ordinsnoo (Ordinance NO,
requirement slated in the toning
The l4rm •Loi Lin4e+ as u9sd in this ordinance shall Wean the
division lines Of any shown lot or par041 of iand which circus 4
eerib, an area vJthin the attached plat.
v
•
I
{ 2, Lot Lines shall be changed only by resubdividi" : ,A ~
platting in the manner provided by the 8ub&visio4,?4qulatiow;'01`
in Article 13,03'0! Appendix A to the Code of Crdinenoed.
3. When a tract or parcel of land is reeubdivided or replatt-
ad, any and all additional rights of way and easements which are•.
a deea.ed naaeeeary by the Planning and Sontag CamiseLea shall be '"r
dedicated by the owners of the land the same as if the treat or
parcel vere being originally subdivided.
tach lot or tract shown on the attached plat shall be
limited to one structure only ragardleoa of tke vas indiaated'on I
the plat, until sass is further platted within the delineated at"$ jI
i
shown on the attached plat* and each such plat shall show all Oro» ! + '
I, xt
I posed building sitsa, building set back lines from each street aced
4buttinq property, all utility, street] alley, and aces rights' E
of way, and drainage ways. Upon the dedication to the City of all
needed atr"ts, allay rays or easements to mar" bass, and upon
ti the completion of the paving of all stree4 abutting snob pgaperty,
and nodded to, gain access thereto, as ray be required by the plae:n-
ing and toning Commission, such plat shall be filed of record in
the Plat or Dead twoords of Denton Countyp along with the,general
3
plat attached hereto upon its approval by the planning sad reaiag I
E
Commission, Nuildieg permits will only be issued for theme aNas
shown on the detailed plat as building areas within the met back
lines,
I
S. When a tract or parcel of land is nsubdlvided or platted
as dascribdd in the paragraph above, any and all additional tight
of way and easements required or chased necessary by the ilanning and
laninq Commission shall be dedicated by the owner as if the braet
or parcel vote being originally subdivided. 3
6, All provisions of ordinance No. 69-01 (toning ordinanoo)
of the City of Denton shall apply to the property within the attached
plat to permit the moning user indicated thereon, by shading or }
1111 1+e"'d x •vrt A,i ik n'«':~+tw ~w~`,~t!'.i~,ea }
E -•~f?~' i~: ~:~d~t►.~~. r~4, `~Sp~r,,rrt" , t'y: ~i1~ °4, ♦j}~3.~ •k ;',.i »u ,q
' y • 411
otherwise, and no other restrictions than those found Yo~~~m~saah !'t
use district shall al exce t as f:'.> ~ ' ; 19
PP Y, P provided herein, ba ' by~.daed res ;
triction, nor shall any other use than those permitted bPthb res i~
pective coning district be permitted within the areas so ~islinalid...f
;ik _ 1~
' on the attached plat, and the toeing district areas so defieied ehi~'1-
~ not be changed except by amendment of this ordiaasae. P, a!lingmor,4
~
replatting of any area shall not affect the uses permitted within
the respective districts shown on the attached plat. ' - --r'
i i
7. All the streets# eadisents# allays and rights 6f, way
ii dioati9
on the attached plat have been properly dedioated, or are now beiu*':•
dedioeted, to the City of Denton, and the some are hereby;sooepted by
said City of Danton, and the same are hereby accepted by said City.."
for public purposes.
{ 1. All streets shall be paved as required by the Planniny'aiad i
loving Commission prior to the issuance of any building permit* and
all paving shall be done according to the spwifiations sA file in
the office of Community Development, and fader its direat insgotiea
and supervision. The paving width within the designated atreet sights f
i of way shall be as required by the Director of Community Dawlopmaal,
r ; provided that the usual standards for sales be followed.
? 0. All ordinances of the City of Denton and laws of tbi State
of Texas shell be ocrplied with, and all regulations regarding the
subdividing of property are hereby expressly made applicable hereto,
including Appendix 'A" to the Code of Ordinaneeb.
10, No building permit at certificate of oconpsnoy will be issued
until the partinent conditions stated herein have been ocmplied with.
11, All structures other than residential structures shall be
built in conformance with the requirements of the second fire district t
as established and defined in laction 5-1 of the Code of Ordinances
and such structures shall be subject to the regulations pertaining to
such second fire district.
4-
!1•, ~~v Jtja~~;9J, a .a
i
9
1
E
The Ovnor of tho land described in the attached plat, for and
in consideration of the granting by the City Council of this Zoning
classification on the said property, does hereby bind 1t4019. Its
successors, executors, administrators and assigns to W.Liodomplye'4
all of the above described terms and conditions for thi,iue 'at said
land as long as this ordinance shall remain in offeotpp'and tha'aaid ♦J"
i
owner understsnda that without fuel and complete oomplianoe A its e,.
part with the said tarns and conditions the mss permitted herein
and hereby would otherwise be prohibited under the loninq Osdlaanea ~ ; I
of the City of Denton, and in order to seoura this am saftnt to the
Boning Nap to make rocb 'rle of the aforesaid lande does Mssbr aeventiit
that It will fully and'oospletely comply with the tares cad eenditions,
I heroin mentioned, that this covenant shall rim yith the landp and
shall be binding upon itself, Its hairs, sucessmorsp axecutorso ad-
p ministrators and asaignsp that upon breach of this covenant t>is
Planned Development District'My# at the city Councils diaesstaaap
i
bq made null and void and thereupon said property shall onas agrs•end {
immediately become subject to the regulations applicable to pxopertr
p In the "e1'-7' single ramaily Boning District mdar the term of the E
I Boning Ordinance of the City cif Denton without SAY right an the part
of Itself, its hairsp svcosesorep executors, adainistrators or assigns
to continue the developslent of said premises as planned♦
1' BYCfiION II.
That the City Counail'of the City of Denton, ilaxasp hereby finds
that such planned Dove lopmnt District Is in accordaaoe with a oar-
prehensive plan for the purpose of promating the general volt"* of
the City'of Dentanp Texas, and with reasonable coosidArstion~ &W*f
other things, for the character of the land and for eta"pecallar suit-
ability or yeouiiar uses and'vith a view to amearving the value of the
i
homes and buildings in the vicinityr protecting human lives, and on-
couraging the aoet appropriate uses of land for the maxima benefit
to the city of Denton and its citiaens,
i
M T.
w•
e "W
,...eve
1
i
.~.i } it'
i
SECTION M.
T.4
That this drdinancs shall be in full force 'a" a lie++ }
alter its passage and approval, the required poblio,ha;ai~ays ba i 1
heretofore been held by the Planning and zoning Coasdstie~s aQ8 thr
council of the City of Denton, Texas, Of tat,givinq dw ier'th 4, i
PA98SD AND APPROVED this the 24th day of rebrnasyy DL''I! . I
, # i
1 city or DEII a item
t crry or Dsie o~0 T9xu 1
i Ar P D As Ulm rORN i
1
ITV of bIRM, TE1W
IIf
1 jai .4 ,rv
.
y
~ s~~
! mil
i
r
t
i
i
V r
P
a
f(~oe v ar i.
*AAm
' a q A o i I I ~
A M ~ i F;
I
r
i
1
Ia
D
1I a rms r~~r '
I ,
< ~ i II b t If ~ :t
C
1 p ~ 0 .,t a
in 0 0
u
1 Iq ~ ~ ~ ~ Q I
m ~ ! ' S i k
41
I aw i I i i~ , b
.
i
A ~ x ; -.-t•~~ t -1,~y X41 S
1
a. n f I
f, d
Y
l
i O*i , ' +rs
After haarH4 one proponent, no opPOnants, and the City r
ct. i,v Jattort for dental of a Conmurtial classification
rid rezoning to a feneral Retail classification, the public hearing
was closed. A motion was rude by Thompson, seconded y Jones to I,
deny petition Z•1189. Motion carried.
b. 1-1192 The petition of Mr. Marry Down that the Boning ;
assifiatlon In the 210Q block of Malone be changed free the Agricultural
g(Al) to the Single Family SF-10) 6essifiotion. The pproperty It further
~
described as being a troe of land Approximatel 8 1/2 acres, looted
east of the intersection of Bawling Groan and Auburn Lane. Malone Street
connects with this property on the south side. The City tax records
designate this prnpertY as City Block No. 4012, tot Nos. 11 and 12.
After hearing one proponent, one opponent, and the City
Pllneer'a retoarnfndation for approval, the public hearing was closed.
A w4tian was made by Da►Is, leconded by Janes to approve 2-1192. Notion
carried.
c. Consider' the Guest at Mrs Cub Jim to onnd a portion of
a Planned Development (PD-2 eluslfieattfan. Thai property to this request
is located in the 2600 bto ef FAIL The Pianned Dewlaappaarret, referred
"lop' ,
to tto HeritaageeuOaks his OOaak P~Le, Is a town splspparttzom hypo the
development of a smu11 retlil shop no rlst. The location of the
proposed shoppping fu1114yy is on thhae southwst comer of the intersection «
Of Coronfh tr1e4 uid Be11 Street. The City tax record designetea this I
property as City Block No. 135, set No. 3.
After hearing to proponents, one op=t and the City Pi&wr's ~
rec"Adatlon for Appproval of this request with coodltibni the public
hearing was cloud. A tat do was male by T son, seconded by Jane to
approve the asanded Planned OeveloPaant with the follatng Bono tionil _ VA
1. The General plan showing an up to-date p rills of the dowloprfn!
fit11 tyashallkbesatttaacheedd9ass am vended par! of he Pl wood Dee% fret
(PD•!~.
1i1 lottNo. /A'shhiii E1tude ikppa ti oldthe shendedAsite City and also a
part b the planned Doveloperint (h0.2) classification. -
3. Conslderationst
a. Canstder street name for common etrwt linking Northwood
M.eass Gvtlopmant and Kingston Tract Dfvflopawntt.
Mar considerable discussion betwifn Mr. Fria RgIr And the °
Cosarfsslon, a motion Nat Pik by Th%ah and seconded by Jones to 1Mtruct
the City Staff to tend roltstered lotikeere to each petitioner asking than
to reac a decision on a neutral nw before the mat Mont and 10Mog
muting. Otherwise, the Commission will "all" the earls of street.
Motion carried.
A motion was made by thmspson, seconded by Jones to Adjourn. Notion cepried.
Meeting adjourned at SM P.m.
f rsurt
c
T-
i
E~ D w
' ,tilrll 3, 191a cuiainuc3
rrelwd afer~utwantyPfivenye rs ofaservieo inrtheaE7oetric~Pyroduuction Department.
The Ma or *Ira presented a framed $100 bill, a gift from his co-workers at the
Power Plant.
S. PUBLIC MARWA.
(A) A public hearir w s held on 7.1189 the appeal of W. Don N. Milli
requesting that the zoning clssslitcatin in the 4106 block ot'Interstate 34 be
clanged fray the Agricultural (A) to the Caom vial (C) classification. This
property is further described as being a tract of land approxfootely 16 setts,
1 Situated between b'reenway Club 8states on t&% north an6 Denton Electrid Cc op~
Ins., on the sath. This pprroeppeerty fronts the i.~terstate SS frontage road. 7Ae. '
City tax records dasignste this property as City dock No. 4010, Lot *a. B sad 10. f
After hoar two propowts, one opponent and a report of dee►!a1 by,
the Planning and Zoning CanaisSion potion cos no by Keeley secotded by tlCletelder
that the petition be approved'forwnaral Retail (GR) and that the petitioner
not be required to wnstntc "offices as it buffer to Ascent apartmnt units.
Motion carried four tj one, with Jester abstaining.
1 lie hearing wag held n 1=1114; the petition of Ord *M
Dart raquesklnp t'utt the ran elassifiation in the 2100 block of Mslem be
changed from +mgrlcuitursl~jl to the single Fmiiy (0-10) classiflcatlea,
+ The property is further descri u beiritz a tract a lard, pp tell B 1/1
acres, located mot of the intersection ooff Bowl l~,t~ Crean atdaJaibtrrri Lee. MalaM
street connects vlth this property an the south sift. The City tax records
designate this property see City ak No. 1012, Lot. lbs. >1 aM 17.
After.hearing no
approval from the playn rtoningts and Caa4aiselnoon in oypa~neition, and a report of.
i
seconded n, ration tall stage by schtteidee, ,
by Jester that petition be approved. Motion carried. j
~ (C) A public hearing cos held on PD•7 Amonkent the petition of i
t ` be. Camended. Ths ub w s "king that a portion of a planned dmtdOWt W-2I clatsifieatioe
property M this r""s is Ioeattoedd in the 600 6.1od of Boll. •
The Planned Dwelop tto Warred to as Heritage Oaks or Oak Plant, is a towrth ales/ '
apartment tyke of devITftt and a request has been ergs to wed this peen to I
allot Eor t1u developaatt of a smell retail .slapping lox, TM location of the
preposed shopping facility is on the southwest correr~ths intoretntlen of
Caranrdo street cad sell strata The City tax record desisnates this property as
City Block No. 1.5, lot No. 3. }
After hearing ern proponent and nono inoppoaitlat and a of i
approval from the Plannin1 and Zen '
eqG~ise t was peon by Joe
seconded ter
b1' Ropey that the t wit by approved subject to the Following eaektinsi
i
(1) The general lam showin! an to-dsto progrtee of the decal~
4 meat of 1#iitiage Oaks !nt• 1960 ad rte location of tM oposid !
shoppngtty shah be attached as an amended pqt qt tlti ;
Planned (PD•t) classification,
07} tract of IS Mt City clock 1 g lot t•A cad Ci : ><Lock 1371
tot 4•A hall sd l a part of t!n aea>tdtd site Stan And also
a part o~ the Planned Development (00.1) classification.
.
Motion carried,
t
8. The Mayor rowgnized w, S. "BllP, Who rho a~ttraised dissatiefa.tion
with utility rata cad city services in raneral, Mrs. Nash also spoke,
Herb Adler 110 steratou Plaw, w ertod that the city use t6vti g cost
to fuel to fire boii4ro at the Power plant. He also asked that something bo done
now about the present fuel ewer incy.
W. P. Droto, 1900 1b11ybill Lone, also expressed discontent With utlliW
rata.
i
` as •.,.L{ ~w,war.. .I.ai.v,♦ MM'~`+1.~l1 l4 `..r?rf v°... IC1y,;1
, n. rue _ .,.t•.}. f~µr^~f d~
Kl I,.
.
I
i
a
7Yf ~ rt7 /~r t g v,
1
u
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
July 18, 1979
The regular meeting of the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission was held
July 18, 1979s at 5 pam. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building.
PRESENTt Linnie McAdams, Bill Brady, Robert LaPorte, Andy Sidor, Richard
Taliaferro, and Marilyn Gilchrist. Staff memberst Sam listi, John Lavretta,
` Rick Svehla, and Secretary.
ABSENT: Don Ryan
1. Swear in new Planning Commission member and reorganize the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
Ms. Marilyn Gilchrist took oath of office as new planning Commissioner,
Ar
Reorganization of the Commission was tabled until after consideration
of Item IV-B.
11. Approve the minutes of July 5, 1979.
No action was taken at this time.
_y
lit. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1407, This is the petition of Ms, Linda lavender requesting
f a change in zoning from Multi Family (MF-1) to Single Family
j (SF-7) classification at 609 West Oak Street.
The petitioner's husband, Mr. Cochran, spoke in favor of the
E
request wishing to have the zoning correspond with the use of
j the dwelling at this location.
j Ms. Yvonne Jenkins, representing the Denton Historical Commission
requested favorable consideration of this request which will con-
tinue the downzoning trend on Oak Street as a beginning step in
historical preservation of the area.
No one spoke in opposition,
Staff reported that of 23 notices sent to surrounding property
owners, one was returned in favor and one in opposition to the
requost. t,t
Motion made by Brady and seconded by Sidor to approve 2.1407. Motion f
carried unanimously, 1
B, 2-1409. This is the petition of the Municipal Police Department
requesting a change in zoning from Multi Family (MF•1) to Light
I,, Industrial (LI) classification on 2,5 acres located on the west
side of Woodrow, .3 mile south of East McKinney,
a
A
+y}~{
.alf~~ifr
1+ 'd
I
2
Chief of Police Mills requested the change in zoning in order
to construct a new animal control shelter. The building would
be 3,500-4,000 sr''jare feet in size with the remainder of the
tract used as pr;ture. ¢
No one spoke in opposition,
returned o in favor notices of sent to
Staff ,one reported was that f
the request and i nonerinerty
owners
opposition.
Chief Mills responded to the concerns of the Commission and staff.
Odor from the animal shelter can be controlled, but noise some- ;
times causes a problem to surrounding residents. This site was
selected after much searching throughout the city and found to
be the only available site, with utilities available. It is
felt the site in this request would cause the least negative
impact to surrounding, undeveloped properties, Also, a non-
conforming use (Meet Packing Plant) already exists in this a-ea
and very little opposition has been expressed by the surrounding
ppropertyy owners. Although surrounding property is zoned Multi
Family iMF-1), there are currently no plans for multi family
development. to a Motion carried withyfiand ve incfavor andGoneh(Sidon) inp pposition9.
C. Z-1410. This is the petition of Mr. Robert Horn requesting an
amendment to a Planned Development zoning district located on
the north side of proposed Windsor Drive extension, west of
Stuart PD zoning, authorizing 100 apartment units on a five
4 acre tract beginning 450' west of Stuart, was approved in 1978.
i The petitioner seeks an amendment which would permit 116 apart-
ment units.
Mr. Robert Horn stated that the area specified in this request
is buffered on three sides by zero lot line development and on
the fourth side by a greenbelt, Because this is.a limited tract,
nor should there be any
traffic patterns surrounding not properties,
No one spoke in opposition,
Staff reported that of the two notices sent to property owners
within 200 feet of the request, one was returned in favor of
the request and none in opposition, j
Motion made by S1dor and seconded by Brady to approve Y-1410. Motion
carried unanimously, s
D. 2.1408. This is the petition of Mr, Dale Cunningham requesting {
annexation and Light industrial ((L1) zoning classification for
295 acres located on the north side of Highway I1, adjacent and
east of Bonnie Brae Road.
g
3
Attorney Randy Johnson spoke in favor of the request for Texas
Instruments. TI owns the land and plans to develop the tract
at some future time. TI anticipates such a development to have
a positive economic affect in Denton and foresees no negative
impact to the area.
`olo one spoke in opposition.
7 ~
i
Staff reported that of 19 notices sent to surrounding property i
owners, four were returned in favor of the request and none in
opposition.
tI
t Commissioner LeForte asked about the effect Light Industrial (LI) '
zoning would have on the price of the Loop right-of-way extending
through this property.
Mr. Johnson indicated this was uncertain. He then rebutted the {
concerns of the staff stating that TC does not want the area I
zoned is Planned Development because this would limit their
ability to develop economically and delay the development process, E
He assured the Commission that 71 has no intentions of building
on the site proposed for the loop rigght-of-way, feeling the ex-
tension of the loop in this area would enhance the site for`T I,
Motion made by Sidor and seconded by Tallaferro to approve Z-1408.
Motion carried unanimously.
Iv. Considerations;
A. Consider final site plan for a portion of Planned Development 24,
i Motion made by Brady and seconded by Sider to approve the final site
plan for a portion of PD 24 with the following conditions:
1. Site plan is recommended for appproval ~.r the proposed development
r of 116 apartment units on this 6.089 acre tract, subject to
approval of the zoning amendment by the City Council, The
building arrangement and size drives, setbacks, sidewalk,
fence, and parking layout shall conform to the submitted plan. 111
2. Advertising signs shall observe standards required by the Zoning
t Ordinance.
3. A subdivision replat of this tract shall be approved prior to
I issuance of a building permit.
Motion carried unanimously,
B. Consider final site plan for a portion of Planned Development 2.
Boyd Morrison requested favorable consideration of this site
plan pproposing a neighborhood service development. Also, he
is willing to comply with any conditions for development.
f y
Y [1
G
u
P~5
I
t
i
WWI
} 4
s
i
Motion made byBrady andisecconditlonsidor to approve final site plan
for PD.2 with t
1, A building ten feet (101) shall be observed from the
property western 4
2. The trees shall be planted as indicated by the modified site plan, y
The area indicated as green space will be planted with grass,
Also, a low hedge shall be planted immediately in front of the
parking area on the east side of the property and at the end of
the parking lot on the west side of the property. e
3. The dumpster shall be located as indicated on the site plan, and
a 6' x 6' wall enclosure shall be built on three sides of the 11
` du star. A plan for the enclosure will be submitted to the
Building Official to ensure the proposal is compatible with the
dumpster vehicles.
4. The building walls indicated on the elevation plan will be of
masonry construction. There will be no detached signs permitted,
All signs will be located on the building.
5. The uses permitted in the building will be neigghborhood service
re character, office uses. store, n other
not permitted.
retail and offi e
Motion carried unanimously,
1, Reorganisation of the planning and Zoning Commission took place at
this time because,one of the Commissioners needed to leave.
' John Lavretta called for nominations of Chairperson and Chairperson
pro Tem.
Laforts nominated McAdams as Chairperson, Tallaferro seconded the
nomination. Nomination ceased. McAdams elected as Chairperson by
unanimous vote,
sidor nominated Brady as Chairman Pro Tom, McAdams seconded the
nomination, Nomination ceased, Brady elected as Chairman Pro Tom
by unanimous vote,
(Commissioner Brady left the meeting at this point,)
C, otovementsctoiPecannCreakeinrthepvloinitypofcPecanaCreeknnel m-
Motion made by Talieferro and seconded by Gilchrist to acquire the
property for Pecan Creak Improvements, Motion carried unanimously. i
D, Consider acquisition of property located on Woodrow Lane for an
y/y~x animal shelter,
' P`3 f art{j
k I
A .91 ~
js
e
Ah;,
f
.k~cr:
t
r~
A?I
i S
5
i
Motion made by LaForte and seconded by McAdams that in view of the
pressing need and for lack of a suitable alternative, the land be
acgalred for the provision of an animal shelter with the condition
that the site plan be reviewed by both the planning Commission and
City Council. Motion carried with four in favor and one (Sidor)
in opposition.
Emergency Items:
E, Consider disposition of excess city property located at the
southeast corner of Oak and Avenue E.
Motion made by LaForte and seconded by Gilchrist to dispose of the
property. Motion carried unanimously. i
F. Consider the acquisition of a parcel of propperty near the inter-
section of McKinney and Bolivar Streets to be used in connection
with the new Central Fire Station.
;
John l.avretta explained that prior to City Council action in acquisi-
tion of any property, the Planning Commission is required to study
and recommend action to the Council.
E Public Works Director Rick Svehia introduced the Commission to the
{ tract necessary to be purchased for construction of the new Central ;
Fire Station.
, f r. .
Motion made by Sidor and seconded by Gilchrist to purchase the pro-
Forty for use in connection with the new Central Fire Station. f`
Motion carried unanimously,
Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission adjourned at 6;45 p.m.
Y~
i
i
}
d
A'I
x Aid ~ .y
3y ; ~
~A titi< h C i.4.:
k
7
i
i
Aupwt 7, 1974 Continucd '
CITY OP D~ffOtt, 7E7U~4 t
ATrPa'T:
C11Y OF D1LPfol nM5 9
APPPa'gD AS TO LEGAL. PORN.
~ I
CITY OF Dom)
Motion was We by Voles, 0I Stepho st t the Resolution be
" ' and flash
Wood. On roll call vote Stewart "nay', Yeia 'aye", St ens ayd
eyd'. lotion tatried.3 to L
p, 7ho Cavrcil considered a Mliaiin& h q~eni:A pecifia ion s. Ater
and snthorite the architect to psocad
lotion %a Mobs. by vela, seconded by Std to sa,thorioe the atrltitoet
Proceed with p1MS and specifications for the •uw animl shelter, Motion
toed.
1DeveloyaMnt s Council considered site plan •d Eon a portion of Fleeted
s
accorded ~y volt to approve site plan for 24.
Motion was Muds. by Stephens s'Motion Grrled.
a portion of PlurNd Developsasn 2-
it. w council considered site pion Apptowl for a Portion
Wt of Plsawed
ion was made by Vela, eocwAod Stewart to apprew sits plan
for a portion of Planned Devolopriast l with the folimm eaeditioml
(A) A buildir.S setback of ten feet (10 Pat) shdi be OWerved fro
the western property line.
a ii y~th
r (f) trout gall ibe 110fito a 1~e►ayteacd~blr It boo
=rail. hed~ hall uaa be Plntediriiat~ly1bl:it
tMawt ds. of the
of the pparaSN t i an ,i
and of flu parkin4 lot on the It aiM of efw 'Ptrlerty
motion carried,
Srod"
a etion "**It of Mr ,
U chard
►1, eo a ll located ed alon mlmD WOW b deWOW STf, in n *
f repardln/ is s sere. auth"e DaepnperdonwCounty.
Motiar. was tads by Volt, seconded by Stephc to dsm ~UOR
mr to direct the City Attorney to Propers. an appropriate o j
~
11, The Cossnail cquidercd disposition of aXcaae City propesh" loo►tod at
the aoutheut carrier of Oak and Avem.a I.
Motion m We by Stewart, weeded by Stephens to dispoac of the
above exceea property, ;
Vets, seeondod by Muh to table the Satter,
anode
Motion wu than by
Motion carried.
i
it
4
•.r• r••.• •~..r`•Y'w...r.Y.r ww~ ~ N r4i rr,r~.~lr •wr•r ~rl •rrw..Y r.•i.A~~.a•ya.rY'r'r«•M~.~••SI 'A
iwY ~•rr r•. r• M ••1 / ,
r ,\y\• r~i ~ 'rte '
1 1
Y 1
Iy.Y YN. 1 . 1•\\I I
Wli 3. rr •••NI•II.Lr✓ urll.war..r.rr+•~iw ~wr br '
a ~ f 4 • + ~ 1 • / / 1. 1 • \ 1 V •r+•..w w•.~1 r.r•~•• y • I
y' 1 ♦
1
F~~" t
1
1
_ r l(~_-/fir • , 1
'dQlLf~i~" ` '•7• P-4ft • , Q ~,r n w, .11 • r , , f 1
IMQSTER
CATION'" '
N1~~~ 1 • •'1 v
111 1 •01►L5! <u~ /
mow. ►.w.w•'uta.~^~i.......y.r ~ ~...~3'jr '
E •/r/r• r''J~•r f lr;i ~,r♦i~~ , it ,~L, •
0 0"
1 10
•.''r. l••
.01
• '1 I Y7`,"? 1•~•/•r.h„ Ir•.r 1! r>i / ;1}•• 1•. Y ' 1'•H~YI ' • ♦ . r • ' .
SHRUBBERY
• ss' is1\wL 'or tia
• 1 ~ 00
1ltit . ,
• 1~\•.. y •,1 ,1 n r 1 '1, • .,'r~1'vl • • ; ~i~•'ti, ' I f• , ' 1. I ~
' N'.r hL ',r,'1 rr,atrWrjl 'r • •s ~
1 `
~ T' ,T • is ~ 1 +E
, ~ , i 'tr 1' i Ire 1 i~
40 's
r 1 1 1 w a ~f 1, .,,1 , , 1 1
~~r w~+wr.w~l!i[.rr_~r 1 ' , ,'1 • r 1. to f' •1 •11•~ 1 ~ I r
14
, i , r• r,„ ..1 1 ,rr r18 .1'. 1 ,r> ,il h,f
h
lY.
I
V Y i
rC•}e.F I ~ y} Int6 11'.
.6
s
i
City of Denton
Memorandum y
August 7, 1979
AGENDA ITEM; s
Consider site plan approval for a portion of Planned Development 2.
SUMMARY:
Planned Development (PD) zoning classification has a two stage review ppro-
cen!+re including first, approval of the basic land use plan and secondly,
review and approval by the City Council of a detailed site plan, Planned
Development zoning for multi family use and limited retail use was a proved
on a 34 acre tract located on both sides of Coronado Drive, west of Bell
Avenue, in 1973.
The apartment areas have been completed, with the exception of one tract,
and there is now a proposal to develop the limited retail area at the
corner of Bell and Coronado. The developer has submitted a site plan and
building elevation showing his proposed development. `
The planning Commission feels that the development of this retail site should
be reviewed very carefully because of Its proximity to residential develop
mint, There are low density apartments to the south and west and simile
family homes located to the north and east of this site. The Commission
I feels that it is important this site be integrated as much as possible
into this residential environment,
i
The site in this request is somewhat over in acre in sire, The devilopor
is proposin a 6,750 square foot building located on the West side of the I
rapertty with the parking area near the ntersection of Bill and Coronado, `
The parcel has a "L" shaped configuration, and there is no development i
a proppoosad for the south side of the property (see attached site plan end
map} The Planning Commission recommends some basic changes to the peti-
tionar s original site plan including more green area, a 101 building
setback from the western property line, a dumpster location and enclosure,
and a limitation on signs,
RECO_ hM1Ef`YION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the modified
1 site plan for this portion of PD-2 with the following conditions:
1) A building setback of ten feet (101) shall be observed from the
western property line.
I
2) The trees shall be planted as indicated by the modified site plan, "
The area indicated as greed space will be planted with grass, Also,
a low hedge shall ba planted immediately in front of the parking aeae
on the eas! side of tha property and at the and of the parking lot on
' r the west side of the property.
1
3
rrE
1
e
2 a
"f
7
3) The dumpster shall be located as indicated on the site plan, and a
6' x 6' wall enclosure shall be built on three sides of the dumpster.
A plan for the enclosure will be submitted to the Building official,
to ensure the proposal is compatible with the dumpster vehicles. t
4) The building walls indicated on the elevation plan will be of masonry
construction. There will be no detached signs permitted. All signs
will be located on the building, l
6) The uses permitted in the building will be neighborhood service in ,
character, such as a convenience store, and other small retail and
office uses, A restaurant or club is not pereittedx
The Planning and Community Development Department also recommended approval
of the site plan with the suggested changes.
ACTION REQUIRED:
1
The City Council should move to approve the modified site plan for this "a!
j retail portion of PO-20 with the recommended conditions,
EXHIBITS:
~ !Modi
b fied site plan
I
+I ;
j
i
x • !
v
N
}s
1
a
t vaal I
r
l ,
NO.
AN 0It41NANCE AMENDING THE ZONINO MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TO AS AS SAND WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
01(6vkk;CI1S OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS EY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1, ;
A1'D AS S11D MAP APPLIES TO LOTS 17.1 i/, 19 AND 19.1 OF BLOCK
NO. 37AA AS SHOWN THIS DATE ON THE OFFICIAL TAX MAP OF THE CITY
OF DGNTOw, TEXAS, AND NOAB PARTICULARLY DESC31BED THEREIN; AND
DECLARING AN AFFECTIVE DATE. 4
THE CUUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSi
SECTION 1_
I That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted
the 14th day of January, 1969, as en Appendix to the Code of
Ordinancos of the City of Denton, Texas under provisions of
N Ordinanco No. 69.1, be, and the same ~o hereby amended as
follows;
All the hereinafter described property is horebY roloYed
troll the Multi•FAwily 'INP•2" District as shown on said :611 hi
Nap, and All provisions of Ordinance No, 00.1 idoptad the 14tR
day of January, 1969, as amandod, $hall harem tar ipply to acid
property os Netshbo:nood Service 'NS" District,ln the-vame
manner as other property located in the Neighborhood Service
"NS" District and more particularly described as follows$
.
' All that certain lot tract or parcel of land situated in the
City and County of Denton, Taxes foteted botwoon Collier Riot
and Avonuo 0, beginning immediately north of Underwood Strfet
and totaling ipproxiaatutr 1.1 acres of lnnd, wore or less, and
sore particuUry doscrlbed as Lots 17.1, 1 , 10 and 19.1 of
Block No. 31111A.
S~,C'CrON It.
T11At the City Counell of the City of 06 ton, Texas hityyay
finds that such chango is In accordance kith a copprohe i1 w
tan for the purpose of romoting tho lionsrol welfare op Rhe
! City of Content TOxai, and With reasonable conslderAtion aw ng
other things at the character of the district and I gto
pocutlte suitability or particular uses, and with 'a vpew` to
consetving the valtw of the buildlAgst protecting huiten lives,
and oncournkint thn most ipproprlato uses of land fr' tho
maxlenum benefit to the City oI Denton, Taxis, and Its cursors.
~ rcrlDrr irl.
That this ordJnante Shall he in full forts and affect
JAIA01intely after its palmate and App {Oval, the required public
how nos having horatororO been hold Dy the pionning sod zoning
C0011011nn and tho City Countii of the City of Denton, Texts,
artor giving due notice theroof,
PASSUn AND APPADVGII this the day of A. U. 108D.
t~rr oar ac N TEXAS PATH
AT YPS'Y; I
dR1N,Y r -Itr1►; T''~i''C4 •SLL'Tf B'fn,t r
CITY OF UNION, TEXAS
APjIRO1rn A3 TO LDOAL rOR'I
C. 1. 1'AYI,I1 JA CITY AT'rURNIiY f
CITY or I)DN1'38, HXA.-1 ~
x DY: I
j Z-1432 - 1,114DON 11, WILSON
.
~ E
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINAANCB ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT
TO THE CITY OF DENTON TEXASi BEINO ALL 'CHAT LOT TRACT OR
PARCEL OF LAND CONSIST fMG OF PROXIMATELY 6.2 ACR~5 OF 'LAND
LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DEN ON STATE OF
TEXAS AND BEING IN THC 0. S. BREWSTER $URYEY AB5TUCT NO. 56,
DENTON COUNTY TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE E A AGRICULTURAL "A",
DISTRICT PROP&TY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation Vas introduced pt a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Tuxes, on the petition of Joe Below; and
WHEREAS, en opportunity was afforded, at A public hearing
held for that purpose on July 1, 1980 for all Interested
persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon
the annexation provided by this ordinance; and %
j
j WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
ono time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton,
Texas, prior to Its effective dote, and after the public
hearings;
NOW THEREFORE, T11B COUNCIL OF ME CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY SRDAINS%
1 SECTION
That the l.cteinafter described tract of land be, and the '
same Is hereby annexod to the City of Denton, Texas, the the {
same is cede hereby a part of said 'City ■nd the lend and the i
i
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citisens of sold City and e
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now In I
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
sltnnted therein s13e11 be subject to and shall bear its ptorats
part of the taxes levied by the City. The trtict of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to-wit:
All that certain lot, tract or portal of land situoted in the
0. S. Brewster Survey, Abs feet No. $6 Denton County, 77esas,
boint a part of a certain Icalled) 61.776 acre tract deeded by
N. L. Godwin, Trustee to James F. Mason, Trustee, on the 11th
day of July, 1411, recorded In Volume 7IS` Page Sidd Deed
Records of sold County, and being more fully described as
follows:
jj BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said 61.770 acre tract;
f
1
THENCE south Bea 15' 30" east mien116 the north boundary line of
said 61.770 sera tract a distance of .00 feet to in iron pins
THENCE south 890 49' 00" east a distance of 1SS.58 feet to au.
Iron pin;
THENCE south 000 11' 0011 west a distance of 310.2S feat to to
Iron pin;
S -
THENCE north 890 49' 00" west a distance of•868,80 feet to on
iron pin in the west boundary line of said 61.770 acre traet;
THENCE north 010 41' 00" east along the wait boundary line of '
sold 61.770 acre tract a distance of 330.64 feet to the point of
beglaning and containing 6.278 acres of land, more or less.
SECTION 11.
The above described property is hereby classified as '
Agricultural "A" District and small so appear on the official
toning nap of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall be effective Immediately upon its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ,
A. 0. 1P80.
R`1CMD 0. MWAK ~3R ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
A7"f 8S'C t .
C1 F -ON~I, t4"SE~RETAf4
ItR06O'dN'1
TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOAM
C. J. TAYLOR JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DEP64, TEBA.S i
f
BY:
4 3
I
-04- Az
s1r'~
1
RIS0LUTI0N
WHERESS, the City of Denton finds it necessary to dispose
of a certain tract of land located in the City of Denton,
Texas, and more fully described below; and
WHEREAS, the below described parcel of lend was lot for
bid on Nay 17, 1910 and the highest bid of One Thousand light
Hundred Twenty-Six and SO Cents ($1,126.50) Dollars was awarded
1
to Kathryn M. Arrington;
WHEREAS, the City of Denton and purchaser of said parcel,
1
Kathryn N. Arrington,' agree that a consideration of :1,126.5o
1
Is a fair and agreed value of such described property; f
NOW THEREFORE EH IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DINTON, TIM, THAT:
1
1. The City Attorney is hereby outhorlaed to prepare %
whatever legal documents are necessary to complete the transfer '
of property so described below;
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated In the City and County of Denton State of Texas
being part of the H. Puchalski Surver,,Abstract No. 996,:sal
being part of Lot Block 1 of the Amended College Additloa ,
t addition to the City and County of Denton, 'also being std
an i of a tract of land conveyed to the City bf:Deaten';by en Ai
of Special Cosuissioaers of the County Ceurt at Lrx of Dint"
County, Texas In the proeeadln s of the Cit of Denton,, fixio
vs. Fred Arrington' at ux as ailed on Nov"Kir 2, 1976 and is
i more particularly described as (allows:
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said tract laid paint of
beginning 1 ins in the north right of way line of. Hickory
Street and Delns 2204 feet salt of the intersection of the
north right of way line of Hickory Street and the east right of
way lint of Pouts Street;
THENCE west along the south boundary line of said tract tune
brin the north right of way line of Hickory Street a distance
of 11.0 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north io $11 26" west a distance of 165.16 CNt to a
point for a corner in the north boundary line of said rsct;
THENCE east don the north boundary line of said tract a '
distance of 45.0 eat to a point for a corner, same being the 1
northeast corner of said tract$
TIIENCE south along the east boundary line of said tract a
distance of 145.01 feet to the place of beginning and
coatitnins 61165.65 square feet of land, more or lass. -
PROYtDED further that no curb cuts shall be permitted on the
above described tract of land.
.141
The City of Denton is hereby further authoritsd to
pay its share of the necessary and reasonable cotta of closing.
3. This Resolution shall take effect iwediately from
and after its passage and approval in accordance with the
E prorfsions of the Denton City Charter.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
i. 1080. 1 ,1
,
CITY OF DENTON, TRUS
ATTEST:
CITY OP DENION, 7HXA9
APPROVED AS TO LBCAL PORN
C. J. TAYLOR JR. CITY
r ATTORNEY, City OF DENTON, TEXAS
by-
f
T T---
ht
F,
..N1 it 1. n . . • .
AwWAPI ~`TT DK~D-VrJ G.Wd W Capvu6. A'UwW " MARTIN k."" G, D.h. f i
THESTATE OF TEXAS, ~ Know All Men By T6eee Present: 771
COUVn. of
That The City of Denton, Texas,& Itualcipal Corporation
W the County of Penton , State a! Texas for Rod to tan darartas of y ,
amAnof
One Tbousaodlight Hundred Twenty-Six and 801100 ($1,626.50).-
I b t to%&Apald by Kathryn Y. Arrington
• t
, f
li have Crowd, Sold and Coaayad, and by thew pteranb do Cant, 9t0 and Ceavq ow tie rid
Kathryn U. Arrington
of the County of Denton I" at Texas , 14 (bat cotet,
► Lot, treat at Wool of land Syirq and being sltustsd In this City abd Ceantai'at
Denton, state of !oast, being part of the s, tuchalski Surveyst M otrtat We. ,
acrd being put of tot 40 bleak 1 of the Aeseded College' Motions as amtkiin to
the City and County of Denton, also being part of a traot'of land caovsyed so the
City Of Denton by a Awetd of Special tbaaitlioMre at this County Cant at L,ev'of
Denton County, Texas In the proceedings at the City of Denton, has ea. lted
Artiagton, at ux as tiled an Moveaber 2, 1071 and is mots partiadatly desarlbad f
a follows(
Wn1M1MO at the eonthwsot earner of ,414 treat said point at Is"Iraing tries in
the north tight at vuy line of lietory Street and being 120.0 test out of %be
(Maesoakloa of the berth right of twy line of Kittery street and the seat right
of bay line of fats Sttaett
T raft vast along the south boundary line of said treok teas being the bomb right
of way line of Klckory gtteet a dtatara at 40.0 feet to a point fat a eotastf
"W= natth 10 91t 2N wet a disEanae of 149,14 feet to a point tot a carpet
In the north beundaty line of said traatf
21111U silt along the notth boundary lira of said teat a distance at 44.0 test to
a point tot a torrar, seas being the northeast ootnar of said ttaotf
TrgMCg south along We set boundary line of said treat a distance of 145.00 feet
to the plate of beginning and containing 00149.1% square took of land, note or
MOVnDID further that no curb tuts shall be petaitted an the above desoribed treat
of Sand.
t ,
P
i'
5
i
i
r
I
f
TO 11AVE AND TO HOLD tht bow domWd p om* toptW with .l x1 dq W, 3+ 400 rl
4 apporta&Ku tWrelo In WIFtN bdoheiet Now IN OW Kathryn V. ArriaSb09, bps
k6 and nognofatevagand It /fAleabybind itself, Its
Wro, @%woy and admin6traron, to Warrant and ywetier Defend ab sad a6yuk IN Wd pmaha wte tits
N;d Kathryn W. Arriastoo, her
t kilt tnd WS" apimt awy Pam Iptoftww tawfndr atalmiaa, ar to d" 68 am, ft, my part
a9mrn our hand at Denton, Texas thh day it
A.D. It 80
Ulm" at Regom of Cmntor:
' ~ ; .AFT.§3T ~............_..w...........,.._.. F.H~..~.k~Y..OL..2~~.TQ3!a._~'x~SA~..,.~..........
a ~ BROOKS MOLT, CITY BKCRZTARY BY,~..µ711CNAAfSn;"61'61rAlCf,'HirOR
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS . ;
a r , p
4 { .i:
r
i
w
..3
July 15, 1980
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Ar
SUBJECT:
j
Resolution Authorizing the Mayor to Exerute`for `and on Behalf
' of the City of Denton One slectrica,l Power Line Crossing
Agreement With the Atchison$ Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Company.
SUMMARY
The Electrical Department is requesting to cross the AT& $F
g Railroad.
Rai Park enterind into aiatandard crossing agreement with the Rlroaes
;f
FISVAL SUMMARY:
Cost of Agreement $150
k ALTERNATIVES:
Bone
rs: w
STAFF RECOMMEM ATIONSs
The Utility Staff recommends approval of the attached
Resolution approving the crossing agreement.
Respectfully
R. B, Belson
Director of Utilities
{
I
EXHIBIT I: Resolution
Ii: Crossing Agreement
j
i
g s
}
t
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF DENTON ONE ELECTRICAL POWER LINE CROSSING AGREEMENT WITH THE
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASs
SECTION 1.
The Mayor is hereby authorised to execute on behalf of the
City of Denton, Texaeo one electrical power line crossing
agreement designated as X-3741; a copy of same being attached
hereto and made a part heteof for all purposes.
i
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of
A. D. 19'0.
RICIM 0. STEnGIR'I
CI OY mm, TMS
„y
t
ATTEST?
i
I
BRA NO T, IIT1YSECRETAR~-~
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS I
APPRVIED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C, J TwYLORI JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
aYs
1 7i
1
i
iCt-29005
i
Yom stn t;tandsA
(Amm"d bf o4o" 6oNow)
LtCIMMeD rot
rV9V 0 MU"LY I.nM ACROM OR ALONG RAI WA1 PROPERTa
Mwtrlo U&I. Powu Ih" W Tway Lbti4 InwDecit" of Yob4s4 Ombmd or Vod,rrtwel) j
THIS LICEKSB, made as of the--..._24th _-&Y of June
r
between_ THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. s
Del asrara
-corporation (hereinafter called "Santa Pe") and '
THA CITY OF DMONO TMgo a Municipal corporatim, acting haveia by its
Ma ror, hereunto duly authorised) )
(hereinafter whether one party or more called "Licensee"). i
folio Itnesseth, that the parties hereto for the considerations hereinafter expressed covenant and agree as
1. In consideration of the sum of._Sfisliuadod kif CY And 1101100 - - - - - - - Dolan
0-150 &Q-- in hand paid by Licensee to Santa Fe, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, i
and of the covenants and agreements of Licensee hereinafter set forth, and of the faithful performance by
Licensee of the same, Santa Fe lleensea and permits Licensee to construct, maintain and use an electric 1
supply line containing a maximum of - four (-)oondactors across or along the 1
premises of Santa Fe at or near the station of Denton, Denton Couatyo Texas
the kind and gauge of said conductors, the pphags,
frequency and voltage of the electric circuit carried thereon and the location of said electric aapply liar
E being more particularly shown upon the print hereto attached, No._%3741
dated- June 17, 1980
marked "Exhibit A", and made a part haroof, For convenience, the said
electric supply line, with all conductors and their supporting or containing structures Jet so far as they
relate to said electric supply line upon said promiseo, is hereinafter called the "Electric Supply Lino" }
8. Licenses shall, at Licensee's own cost, construct and at all times maintain the Bleetrdo Supply Lina
In aftrict accordance with the Specl6eation4 for the time current, for Electric Supp Unee across or along
Railway Property, adopted by the Electrical Section of the Association of Amaean Ralhoada, Or a
I successor agencyy except wbere by alltute or order of competent public authority a different typs of con.
struction or a dit~'eren degree of maJntensnoe is required or permitted, in which cam such sonstrued"
or maintenanco shall be in strict accordance with such statute or order; provided bowevem, all materials
and workmanship employed in the construction and maintenance of the Electric Supply Line shall be sub.
Ject to the approval oL Santa Fe.
& Licensee shall, at Licensee's own coat, remove all combustible material from around wooden poles
and will at all times keep the space around such poles free of such material, and if removal of such tom•
bustible material shalt not be attended to within fifteen (15? days after having been requested br~ Santa
Fe so to do, Santa Fe shall have the right itself to perform tthe work and Licensee hereby agrees W reim.
burse Santa Fe for the expense so incurred
4. During construction and while repairing, renewing or changing the Electric Supply Line, Licenses
shall exercise utmost and extraordinary dillaen,* to the end that no damage shall occur to the pro
of Santa Fe, and that there shall be no interference with the operation of Its railroad. Upon com etion
of the Electric Supply Line or after the making of any changes, repairs or renewals, Licensee 01 it
Licensee's own cost, restore said promises to their former state, and Licensee shall within fltteon (6)
days after receipt of bill therefor, pay to Santa Fe the entire cooE incurred in employ{ng watchmen or su
other means of protection as In the Judgment of Santa Fe mny be required during ehe construction, mein
tenance, repair, renewal or changing of the Electric Supply Line.
6. if at any time during the term hereof Santa Fe shall desire to make any use of its property with
which the Electric Supply Line will In any way interfere, Including the relocation of exiating or the eon-
struction of new lines of poles, wires, conduits and other foeilitles in which it shalt have an interest, Id-
eonaee shall, at Liconsee's own cost within thirty S80) dapa after receiving written notice from Santa Fe
to such effect, make much changes Yn the Electric Supply Line as In the Judgment of Santa Fe may be
necessary to avold Interference with the proposed use of Its property.
t
i
6. Seats Fe shall have the right at ila election itself to construct the Llectrle Supply Line, and at any
tame to mike such repairs, renewals or chaagea therein as It may deem necessary or desirable, and to the
event Santa Fe shall decide to exercise such rigght, Licensee shall advance to Santa F's the cost as est!-
mated by Santa Fe, of such construction, reps, r, renewal or change. If the actual cost incurred ty Santa
Fe in performing such work shalt prove more or leas than the amount so advanced, the difference shall be
promptly paid by Licensee or refunded by Santa Fe, as the case may be. Santa Fe may, at its election, ad-
vance the necessary moneys to cover such cost and, in that case, Licensee agrees promptly upon demand
to pay to Santa Fe all sums to advanced, with Interest.
7. Licensee shall atoll times indemnify and save harmless Santa Fe and other companies operating .
over Its tracks against, and shall pay in full, all loss, damage or expense that they or any of them, MAY
sustain incur or become liable for, resulting to a manner from the construction, maintenance, use,
state oil repair, or presence of the Electric Supply Line upon acid premises, including any such loss, dam- f
age or expense arising out of (a) loss of or damage to properly, (b) Injury to or death of persons, (c) me-
chanlm or other Ilona of any character, or (d) taxes or assessments of any kind.
8. Since. this license Is made In part for the Mnefit of other companies operating over Santa Fe's {
tracks, any of said companies may sue to enforce !,ie provisions hereof, either jointly or severally, as their ?
interests my be Joint or several. None of said companies nor the Santa Fe shall be liable for any damage,
howsoever caused, to the Electric Supply Line, whether dua to negligence or otherwise:
9. If Licensee shall at any time fail or refuse to comply with or carry out any of the covenants hero-
in contained, and such failure or refusal shall continue for a period of thirty (80) days after written de-
wand for such performance or compliance shall have been made upon Licensee by Santa Fe, Santa Fe
may, at its election, without notice, forth Mth revoke this license, and in case of such election, or upon any
termination hereof, Licensee shall, upon request, forthwith remove the Electric Supply Line and restore
sald premises to the condition in which they were prior to the construction of the Electric Supp!y Line.
In case Licensee shall fail to make such removal or restoration within thirty (80) days Santa Fe may
proused with such work, and Licensee shall promptly repay to Santa Fe the cost thereol!. No waiver by
Santa Fe of any default or defaults, or the right to terminate this license, shall be deemed or held to be a d
waiver of the right to terminate the same for any subsequent default or defaults, but notwithstanding i
' such waiver Santa Fe may terminate this license upon any subsequent default or defaults which may oc-
cur nor shalt any termination hereof release Licensee from any liability or obligation heteuadcr, whRth i
er of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts. omissions or events happening prior to the date of
termination or Ouch later date when the Electric Supply Line may be removed and said premises restored i
as herelnobove provided I t
10. Memo shall at all times, at Licensee's own cost, maintain the most effective system and use
the best known and most effective methods to protect the lines, wires, and service of Santo Fe and of any
licensee of Santa Fe whose permission to use said premises antedates the license and permission herein to
Memo, from interference and physical hazard, and if necessary In order to prevent such tnterferenee
or hazard, Licensee shall at Licensee', own cost transpose Licensee's circuits or make such changed in
the construction or Iocati'on of the Electric Supp~ Line as may be specified by Santa Fe.
11. In case of the eviction of Licensee by any one owning or claiming title to or any interest in said
premised, or any part thereof, Santa Fe shall not be liable to Licensee for any damage of any nature what-
soever; or to refund any moneys paid hereunder. a
12, ,any notice to be given by Santa Fe to Licensee hereunder shall be deemed to be properly served
if the same be delivered to Licensee or if deposited In the Post Office, postpaid, sddressed to Licensee at
Municipal DUA14109te bgnt~im, 'fgxaa 16243
13. In the event Licensee hereto consists of two or more parties, all the covenants and agreements of
Licensee herein contained shall cone its the joint and several covenants and agreements of such parties.
14, This' ll6ease may be terminated by either qty hereto upon _ on9_~ _ months' notice
in writing to be served upon the other party, ,tat! therein the day of the month that such termlyatIon
will take place • and upon the expiration of the time specified in such notice this license, and all rights and
privileges of Llcenaeo thereunder ,ball absolutely eeasa. This license shall terminate in any event im-
mediatelyupon the death of the Licensee, if the sole Licensee is an individual
16. This lioease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefitof the parties and their respective legal
representatives, succeaeors and assigns' provided, however, no assignment hereof b L ww.e, Lteenseo's
le I representatives, successors or ass~gna, nor any subsequent assignee, shall be bludin upon Santa Fe
license shall
without the written consent of Santa Fe in each instance, and at the option of Santa Fe on
be forfeited by any such voluntary assignment or by any assignment thereof by operation of few.
E
a~
F
mmr, the IN Wes hive a wk ted thh 3mwe in duplicate ee of the day and year drat
IN WrrlXEeeWst
above writtea
TU ASCIRIGN TS~OUKAC~AAFDD1 tANT11t _SAILWAYCOMIAMY
ArtsovID: -A tea:
AstoD wrfptloal is
ysetete¢t to Owerel yAnAter
Chief Enclum
O1T4
Ar to 8pedflcaHow; Or DIMS, TXW,
6npeAnteodaniatComtoetslatiooe Its x0yor
The A. T.Ja1.Ry.Ca
DGCO don Armed Tw A4L•rndneee44 1
CT 290OS
EXHINT 'A"
TO CONTRACr vetWEEN l
THE ATCHISON TOPEKA ANO SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
NO.P%lGPN DIVISION DALLAS O1ST"ICT '
4 AND i
CirY Or DENrom
GOVERINlf .1 POW-wR LINE CROSSING l
x1-
DfNrON# OENTON Cobyrri EX-4s
SCALE 1 106': A G M-ENGINEERit 1-AMARILLO, TEXAS •'•A•DIGI
DATED JUN6!70/980 p~
l G
'at see• aJ, Map Jt
P,rreslrt ~ QO
~.Ce. Proper/y Gbh N
r•
e e AtefL.
OPP
r _
e ,epr y U17e
E1t~a ~ ~i) ~ I
tL I
6t
tEhorN oN elr, vd,t'. Ko.wlAts _4_~
Sirt wAtA vw.lAO
►OLC7 ON V/w
Gulf ON P0 w N0,70 rO~TAE1 ' L8, lO0.
CLf AAANCI A"I MP G# MAL. ",.E.-HIASC
CIl APA1tC1 AdOYf Nv CO ODMMUIPCAKA LA.It /lJI! 0etI
v9
TO CC CONltpuCtiO 6CIr AAA S~!('il if AfeVN9
I i
1
1
~r
E
r
71
J
f ~
i
i
i
Memorandum
City Council
July 15, 1980
}
Agenda Item:
Determination of Just Compensation for a .561 acre partial tract of land and.
possibly an additional .601 acre tract of land for the rerouting and construction
of Paisley Street. t
Summary,
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) iB•79•DS-48-0014 calls for the rerouting
of Paiseey Street at the Audra Lane intersection, To construct the new Paisley l .
Street, the acquisition of a .561 acre of land from David Mulkey is rerlred.
The taking of the required land leaves an odd-shaped .601 acre tract of land that
the owner may wish to also sell. An independent appraisal of the land in question
was performed by J. A. Hinsley, CRA, and the appraisal was reviewed by the Planning
and Community Development staff. Using the Market Data Approach, Mr. Hinsley
has appraised the value of the required taking at $29400. He has further deter-
mined that damages in the amount of $700.00 would be effected because of the
partial taking. If the owner, David Mulkey, did not wish to retain an odd-shaped
portion of the remainder, the appraised value of the .561 acre tract required taking
and the odd-shaped .601 acre tract is $5,000, total.
Fiscal Issues:
CDBG regulations require the City to offer the owner no less than the appraised
value of the land plus applicable damages. The appraiselvalue for the required
taking of .561 acre is $2,400. The appraised damages are $700.00. The appraised
value of the 1.16 acres is $60000.
Recommendation:
Determine that $2,400 is Just Compensation for the .561 acre tract of land and #
that there would be $700.00 in damages. Determine that $S,000'ig Just Compensation
for the 1,16 acre tract of land. Make a written offer to David Mulkey to purchase
the .561 acre tract for $3,100 and an alternate offer to purchase the 1.16 acre
tract for $5,000,00
Action Required:
1. Determine Just Compensation as $29400 plus $700.00 damages for the described
,561 acre tract of land,
2. Determine Just Compensation as $5,000 for the described 1.16 acre tract of land.
3. Instruct and authorize the Planning and Community Development staff to proceed
with required acquisition procedures.
Exhibits:
_j
i 1. Memorandum
2. Map
` 3. Property description
I ,
s
E
~ t
'
3
i x
N Y~
f e
jt.
u.
r ,
t
t,
S U R V E Y O R S N O T E S
Tract 2 t
All that certain 0,551 acre tract, or parcel of land situated in the J. Brock Survey, r
Abstract No. 15 Denton County, Texas: said tract being tract occupied on the ground as
staked by the City of Denton, Texas; and being more particularly described to follow
Regtn ,or the northeast corner of the tract being described herein ate point South 1
99 degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds West 54.7 feet and South 20 degrees 35 minutes 2C
seconds West 302.1 feet from the northeast corner of an 18:02 acre tract deeded to David
Mulkey on November 11, 1952; I
Thence South 20 degrees $5 minutes 20 seconds West 5),5 feet to a point for corner;
Thence North 99 degrees 52 minutes 50 seconds West 29.3 feet to the beginning of a
curve to the left whose radius is 450.0 feet;
1 Thence with said curve whose central angle is 31 degrees 06 minutes 50 seconds a length
of 244.36 feet to the end of said curve,
Thence South 59 degrees 00 minutes 20 seconds West 47.9 feet to the beginning of a I
i curve to the right whose radius is 625.0 feet; j
Thence with said curve whose central angle is 6 do rate 33 minutes 70 seconds a iorwth f
of 71.33 feet to a point on the north R.O.W. of paisley Street;
Thence South 98 daRrees 51 minutes 30 seconds West with the north of said street
214,2 feet to a point for corner;
Thence in a northeasterly direction with a"curve , to the left, whose radius is 535:0
feet and a central angle is 26 degrade 34 minutes a distance of 266.6 feet to the and i
of said curve,
Thence North 59 degrees 00 minutes 20 seconds Eas't'47.9 feet to the to inning of a 4
curve to the right whose radius is $00.0 feet and 'central angle ia) degrees 06 minutes' }
50 seconds a length of 271,52 feet to the and of said curve;
' r
Thence South 69 degrees 52 minutes 50 seconds East 48,3 feet to the point of beginning, y j
i
q
}
311
k i
Tract 3 1
III
All that certain 0.601 acre tract, or parcel of land situated in the 3 Brock Survey, i
Abstract No, 15, Denton County, Texaal said tract being part of an 19,62 acre tract i
shown by datd'to, David !lulkey, dated tovember 11, 1952 and being more particularly
j described as follows; }
Beginning, for the northeast corner of'tha tract beiri;~t described herein South 69 digress
4o minutes 40 seconds West 54,7 and South 20 degrees J5 minutes 20 seconds West 355.6
fart from the northeast earner of said 1A.02 acre tract; r
Thence South 20 degrees $5 minutes 26 secoo'N"Wset lyi.9•?eeCto a point for a earner(
Thence South Be degrees 51 minutes 30 steeds Wilt 322,2 feet to a point,for a corner;
Thence in a northeasterly, direction with curve to the litft whose radius is 625.0,(eut .
and central angle to 6 degrees 33 minutes 30 seconds a distance of 71.5) feet to the
end of sold curve,
Thence North 59 degrees 00 minutes 20 seconds test 41.9'feet to the beginning of a
curve to the right;
;
Thence with said curve whose radius is 490.0 feet and central anK1e is 11 degrade
06 minutes So seconds a distance of 244.16 feet to the end of said curve;
Thence South 89 deerese 32 minutia 50 seconds East 29.3 feet to the paint of beginning.
s Daveyy Ffalds( Texas Ae*lstered
ce Pubtic 5uevayor .W. X565 i i
1 Yaw S. 195J
• Q V-R
q
• I
CITY OF DENTON '
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETINGS .1n y 190 l9A(}
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PUCED ON AGEND
Approval of final payment to Jagoe Construction Co. for•overwidth paving on
Kings Row.
h `
SUMMARY:
In'the Spring of 14791 the City awarded contracts.to Claude Smith Excavating
for overwidth paving on Kings Row. After Mr. Smith's 'death, tha Council
released his firm from these bids and instructed the staff to negottate new
contracts with the contractor replacing Mr. Smith. This wad done and Mr.
Smith's bid prices were agreed upon.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Estimated cost of Kings Row was $10,109.25. The amount to be paid was =10,706.79
and funds are available in the Street Department Budget for this.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council should approve payment to Jagoe Public for $101708.74
ALTERNATIVES s,
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval
EKHIBITSs
1. Minutes from fity Council fleeting
If. Memo to Rick Svehla
5
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Svehla
FROM: Greg Edwards
DATE: July 10j 1980
4
! RE: Overwidth Pavement and Bridge Improvements on Kings Row
•
1 have received the quantities of work done and the prices indicated on the
contract and recommend that payment in the amount of ;10,708.79 be made to i'
Jagoe Public Company.
le, X, c
Greg, warms-'
.k
i
I
j
i
,I
Tsfj
.
1
Mhy 22, 1979 Continued ~63`w
4. Tho Cototcil considered a contract with Schoell, Fields and Associates ,
concerning the roconstriKtion of the Robertson Street underpass.
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Vela to approve the contract
and ataborize the Mayor to sign. Motion carried unanimously.
S. The Council considered approval of the final application for the 1979-80
0xiumin1ty Development Block Grant, r„ry,
City Planner Jo)ui Lavretta briefed the Council on the content on the
pro,'osed Co mxu~ity Development Block Grant which he had previously discussed
with the Council.
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Hensley to direct the Mayor to
sign tho 1979-80 Community Development Block Grant and submit the application and
assurmices. Motion carried unanimously.
6. Tile Council considered a street inventory report from Texas A F, M.
City Manager Chris Hartung explained to the Council that the street
inventory report from Texas A $ M, which had been previously approved by the
Council, u,as now ready for the Council's approval. Hartung went on to explain
f that the City of Denton has over 200 miles of streets and that we Imov many of
them are seriously in need of maintenance, iio%mver, Hartung explained that the
difficulty was in identifying and putting a priority on those streets that
requiro maintenanco most. He explained that with the street inventory concept
developed in this study the City would be able to identify and put a priority
on those streets that needed maintenance, and he recommended that the Council
approvo the report from Texas A f, M and direct the Staff to proceed with the
study. Hartung also introduced Rich Kerbol of Texas A 8 M Center For Urban
4 Programs, who had developed the report, and asked if the Council had any questions '
for Mr. Kerbel.
Motion was made by Hensley, seconded by Vela to accept the report and
direct the Staff to proceed with the remainder of the study. Motion carried.
7. The Council considered releasing Claude Smith Excavating C y from '
contract obligations and direct the Staff to enter into agreements wit contract-
ors for construction in Kingston Trace and Royat Acres Additions.
Public Works Director Rick Svehla oxplained to the Council that we had
previously requested bids on oversize contracts on City streets in accordance
with our Ordinance and that the bids had been awarded to Claude Smith. SVehla
explainod that Claude Smith had died after the award of the bids but prior to
the execution of the contracts. wehla asked that the Council consider relebsing
Claude Smiths heirs from the contracts :und to consider awarding the contracts
at the pmriously accepted bid prices to time ccotractors.
Motion was made by Vela, seconded by Stephens to accept the release
from Mfrs. Smith and to direct the Staff to negotinto new contracts. Motion
carriod unanimously.
8. 11io Council considered the establishment of an estimated schedule for
completiilp various tasks related to the) Hickory Crook Sewer Line and Lift Station
plans nil,] specifications.
hob Nelson, Utilities Director, explained that the Texas Department of
ir'atc r Ilusuurcos had reviawed our grant application for Step lI funding on cur
Hickory Crock sewer line and had determined that we failed to indicate the
number oC days required by the angincor to complete the design plans. Nelson
oxplained that this required wi amendment to titre contract and that he had contact-
ed i'reese and Nichols, otir Consulting Unginoors, and they indicated that the dosign
plans could be completed within 360 days. a
Motion was made by Stephens, seconded by Vola to accept Amendment 04
indicating; 360 days for design planning and to submit the amendment to the Texas
Dcpa rtownt or hater Resources. Motion carried unanimously.
a
1
1 , prAtac~
t
r
rfa.Ae~"'3
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING:__ Jtily 15. 1980
CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGEND
I
Approval of final payment to Pearcy/Christon, Inc. for 'overwidth paving on
Bonnie Brae, -
SUMMARYt ,
Development at the Skaggs Center was reviewed and approved before the bid
procedures were initiated at the City. Before this, the procedure was to
make a recommendation to Jack Owens, Assistant City Manager, and he-would
either approve or disc prove the overwidth. This was done and the.-City
agreed to the overwidth paving on Bonnie brae.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Cost to the City would be ,$6,273.69. Funds are available in the Street
Department Budget.
.
ACTION RE4 UIRED:
Council should approve payment to Pearcy/Christon for the overwidth paving.
r
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff'recceriends approval of the recommendation.
EXHIBITS:
1. Memo to Rick Svehle
11. Letter from Schoell, Fields 6 Associates
f
f
4
C
v.
1
t 1I
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
T0: Rick Svehla
FROM: Greg Edwards
DATE: July 1D, 1980
RE: Overwidth pavement for Pearcy/Christon Addition Y
I have reviewed the quantities of work done and prices indicated on the
contract and recommend that payment in the am;unt of $6,213.69 be made to
.Pearcy/Christon, Inc. '
have enclosed a letter from Schoell, Fields 6 Associates, Inc. requesting
payment, a copy of a letter from Jagoe Public Co., acknowledging receipt of
payment for work performed and a copy of the contract.
reg ar s
rat c
I
l
y. ~ I
%WW
,
e ,
a
WILLIAM 0. SCHOELL, P.E,
DENY E. PIEUS, R.P.t.
HARRY L. GRAY, P.E. - SCHOELL, FIELDS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
1214 FORT WORTH DRIVE a DENTON, TEXAS 7001
19111383141E, 3000411, METRO 110,102, GAIN ESVIILE6E58D11
July 3, 1980
Mr. Greg Edwards
Senior Civil Engineer r
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: Pearcy Christon'Addi.tion,,North Bonnie Brae Street
overwidth coat participation
Dear Greg:
The revisions which we agreed on the letter I sent you June 25
are as follows:
611 Extra width HMO 446 S.Y. @ $8.34/S.Y.* $3214:.64
111 HMC ex depth: 955 S.Y. @ $1,34/S.Y.w $i327.'45
Lime Stabilization: 446 S,Y:.@ $2.75/S,Y.+ $1226.50
I
Total`Cit; of Denton Costs
I am including herewith o letter from Jagoe-Public Cot6pany advi-
d their full contract amount.
sing on has p° ai
g, us that Pearcy/
please submit this to, the next City Council with your recommenda-
tions if it meets with your approval.
,
Much obliged.
Very truly yours,
SCNCELL, 1'ILEDS, & ASSOCIATES, INC.
REDalgado !w
enclosure
cc; Bill Barnes !
t,,l
r
a ~w*,
r
j
s
Alexander Grant INTERNATIONAL FIRM !
• CO MR ALExAND£R GRANT TANSL[Y WITT I
C9011110 PU[LIO ACCOUNTANTS I
June 10, 1980
6
r
a ,
Mr, Chris Hartung
City Manager
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 78201
Dear Mr. Hartung;
The following paragraphs outline the services we are
providing for the City of Denton on a continuing basis. If in
the future you decide to modify these services, please let us
know so that we may provide you with an updated letter.
We will make an examination of the financial state-
ments of all the various funds and account groups of the City
II of Denton,' Texas as of September 30, 1980 and for the year then-
ended. Our examination will be made i.t accordance with generally
1 accepted auditing standards, adopted by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants and the standards adopted by'the
National Committee on Governmental Accounting in it&,publication
Governmental Accountin er, Auditin and Pinanoii1 411 I' as
amen a y the n uetry aui gu e Audit s o tIII, cal
Governmental Unite, and will include tests o accounting' data
an3 procedures wos consider necessary under the aircuststancea.
In addition, supplemental information not considered necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position, results.bf.opera
Lions or changes in financial position consisting of ,"Uppl6mihtil
finanuial'statements and information related to the details of
items in the basic financial statements will be subjeoted to"the
audit nrocedures applied in the examination of the basic finan-
cial statements. Statistical data and other nonfinancial infor-
mation furnished by the City from the City's records will be
included in the City's Annual Report but such data will rot'be -
included in our examination.' We will assist you in prepiring
the financial report in the proper format and with the necessary
f
r ;
4
1, 1800 ONE DALLAS CENTRE DALLAS, Tx 75201 (214) 1460100
F
n..
.1
Mr. Chris Hartung
City Manager
City of Denton -2- June 10, 1980
f
disclosure to enable the City to obtain a Certificate of Conformance
from the Municipal Finance Officers Association (MFOA). In this
connection, we will provide, without additional cost to the City,
a pre-filing review of the report by Mr. Don Cormie, a partner in
our firm who serves on the MFOA Certificate of Conformance Review }
Committee.
We will be pleased to meet with the City Counoil and/
or Audit Committee prior to the commencement of work and prior
to the issuance of the City's annual financial statement to
discuss the report and any related matters.
The objective of our engagement is the completion of
an examination of the financial statements referred to above,
and, upon its completion and subject to its findings, the expres-
Sion of an opinion on such financial statements. An examination
made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards is
subject to certain limitations and the inherent risk that errors
or irregularities, if they exist, will not be detected. However,
if, during the course of our examination, we become aware of such
errors or irregularities, we will bring them to your attention.
Should you then wish us to expand our norm,1 auditing procedures,
we will be pleased to work with you on developing a separate
engagement for that purpose.
This Engagement will be,undertaken at our. regular rates
and it is our expectation that our fee for this engagement, will
be between $380000 and $40,000. This fee range ineludes•the
estimated cost of our separate reports on the Ciity's Revenue,
Sharing and Community Development Block Orants,_ Our billings
for the services set forth in this letter will be "rendered for
payment on a monthly basis so that you may readily relate our
charges to the work performed,
This engagement includes only those services described
in the second paragraph of this letter. Our fee expectation is
L based upon our estimate of the normal costs of providing, those
f services. Occasionally, extraordinary, unforeseen events or
transactions occur which require the scope of our services to
be significantly expanded. If such circumstances should arise,
it is our policy to inform appropriate officials at the earliest
possible time and to estimate the additional fees involved.
21
i
y
{
Mr. Chris Hartung
City Manager
City of Denton -3- June 10, 1980
In keeping with your request, we will issue our report
on the City's financial statements on or before January 15, 1981.
If the terms of this letter are in accordance with your
understanding of our agreement, please sign one copy of this
letter and return it for our files. We appreciate the opportunity
to work with you,
Very truly yours,
ALEXANDER GRANT & COMPANY`
By . J
artner
BJRhodee
mb
Enclosure
The foregoing letter fully describes the services
roquired and is in accordance with'our understanding.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
- ~ ,e
Date i By
}
.,i
,
t
9
1 /
i~ -fia
IY 1
PAINJ
t s
q
MEMORANDUM
x
DATE OF MEETING: July 1# 1980
AGENDA ITEM: Bid i 8763 Chain Link Fence at Wastewater Treatment Plant
SUMMARY t
This bid is for the construction of approximately 2500 feet of 6
feet chain link fence at the waste water treatment plant. The delay in .i
awarding this bid was caused by the overlaping of this bid and the westa j
water treatment expansion project. We have now established separation of
the projects and the bid is ready to be awarded.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
e
Budget account number 04-70-9-09. 3
ACTION RE UIREDt
' ~g t
Approval by council
ALTERNATIVES I
Reject all bids and re-bid. ~b
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ?
We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder of Westbrook
' Fence Company from Gainesville, Texas,
WIBITSt
it
Tabula,ion sheet.
/t'
John J; Marshall, C.P.M. ~
-"Purchasing Agent
{
JJM/lc
l
~w f
+ r ;