Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-05-82 NOTICE OF OitX SES5ION,I- REGULAR - SPECIAL CALLED - EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE i' OF THE CITY OF DEN N, 'T'EXAS. Notice is he;zy gi,yen that, an the day of LSL. ` -ot 19 , the / . ' City of Benton, e 5 will is a~]d4s_ on regu ar - special called. - emerg~ meeting at r o'clock, m., in the C.r. ?i- :-I.~t e- of t he Municipal Bui ing ocated at 2LS ast Tic' nn` y, ntonezas. The subjects to be considered are listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and make a part of this notice, if during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the Board/Commission should determine that an executive meeting of the Board/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should be held or is required, then such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney as authorized by Article 6252.17 Revised Civil Statutes of 'texas will be held by the Board/Commission at the date, hour, and place given is this notice or as soon after the commencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the Board/Commission may conveniently meet in such executive meeting, or consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and for any and all purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section 2(p), inclusive, of said Article 6222.17, including, but not limited to: Section 2(c), Section 2(e), Section 2(f), Section 2(g), and Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda. Should any final action, final decision, or final vote be required in the opinion of the Board/Commission with regard to any matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney, then such final action, final decision, or final vote shall be at either: (a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of this public meeting, or (b) notice tereof, asu the Board/Commission shall Board/ Commission upon On this / day of ly , the original of this instrument was filed among the official r on of the bulletin i board Denton, 'T'exas, and an original copy was posted in the main lobby of the Municipal Building of the City of Denton at 4 0 o'clock, m. on said date. t AR E A N, C 5 tRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 02140 a NOTICE OF N' RK $HSSION.~ KbGULAR SPECIAL CALLED - EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE OF THE CITY OF DEN kN, TEXAS. Notice is hefeby given that~on the - day of -4 X, u Me' 19 the r City of Denton, as will I (V work sass on ' regu ar special called - - emergeo y , meeting at 'c10ckko M.1 in the > ofi t e Municipal Bui ing ocated at make aoparteofd thare is Agenda enton, isxattached her eto to be 215 sot on +~the'inn listed g notice. If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the board/Commission should determine that an executive meeting of the Board/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should be hEld or is required, then such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney as authorized by Article 6252-17 Revised Civil Statutes of Texas will be held by the Board/Commission at the date, hour, and place given in this notice or as soon after the commencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the Board'Commission may conveniently meet in such executive meeting, or consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and for any and all purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section 2(p), inclusive, of said Article 6252-17, including, but not limited Section 2(g), and section to: and as marked In the attached Agenda* Section 2(j) Should any final action, final decision, or final rote be required in the opinion of the Board/Commission with regard to any matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorne',, then such final action, final decision, or final vote shall be :.t either: (a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of this public meeting, or Bomeetin of the ard/Commission shall Board/Commission upon (b) nat a otice t ereof,taspublic ly the original of Un.this i day of c this instrument was filed among the official records of the City of Denton, Texas, and an original copy was posted on the bulletin board in the main lobby of the Municipal Building of the City of Denton at o'clock,Y-- _m. on aid date. i :A E A tN, 17 S CRE RY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS U214C AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 5, 'x.982 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 5, 1982, at 5:00 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered. 5:00 p.m. 1. Discussion of the Proposed Bond Election. 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S: C. Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6256-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 5, 1982, at 700 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered. 7:00 p.m. 11 Approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of September 14, 1982 and the Regular Meeting of September 21, 1982. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda autborizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations, A. Bids and Purchase Orders= 11 Bid # 9048 - Transformer Repairs 2. Purchase Order # 54329 to JSS Equipment service v . City of Denton City Council Agenda October 5, 1982 Page Two B. Final Plats: 1. Approval of the Final Plat of Lot 10R, Block 11, Owsley Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the Final Plat of the Jupiter Industrial Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Change Orders: 1. Consider Change Order #1 - Contract A Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 2. Consider Change Order #1 - Contract C Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 3. Consider Change Order #2 - Contract A Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board re^ommends approval.) 3. Appearance by Stephen Gorman to Give a Report from the Denton Area service Enterprise Committee. 4. Appearance by Jeffrey Hale to Present Petition to the City Council Regarding the Location of the Crisis Center. 51 Resolutions: 1 A. Consider Leasing City Property Located on the Northeast Corner of Dallas Drive and Willow Springs, to Coors-Golden Distributing Company to Accommodate a Recycling Center. b. Consider Contract with Black and Veatch, Consulting Engineers, for Miscellaneous Engineering Services for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Licensing Activities on Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville Hydroelectric Units. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) Consider Contract with Freese and Nicnols for Engineering Evaluation of Location and Schedule for Water Treatment Plant Expansion. (The Public Utility Board recommends approvals) City of Denton City Council Agenda October 50 1982 Page Three 8. Consider Environmental Protection Agency Grant Amendment for Phase III of the Industrial Pretreatment Program. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 91 Official Action of Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters 11 Formal Action on Law Suit Settlement and Land Purchase B. Real Estate 11 Formal Action on Land Purchase C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 100 New Business: • This item provides a section in which to suggest new items of business for future agendas. 04170 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 5, 1982 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 5, 1982, at 5:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered. 5:00 p.m, 1. Discussion of the Proposed Bond Election. 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel - Under Sec, 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6256-17 V,A.T,S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 5, 1982, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Cha.abers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered. 7:00 p.m. 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of September 14, 1982 and the Regular Meeting of September 21, 1932. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item iii accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid f 9048 - Transformer Repairs 2. Purchase Order # 54329 to J&S Equipment Service City of Denton City Council Agenda October 5, 1982 Page Two B. Final Plats: 1. Approval of the Final Plat of Lot lOR, Block 11, Owsley Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the Final Plat of the Jupiter industrial Park Addition. (The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Change Orders: 1. Consider Change Order #1 - Contract A Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 2. Consider Change Order #1 - Contract C Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 3. Consider Change Order #2 - Contract A Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 3. Appearance by Stephen Gorman to Give a Report from the Denton Area Service Enterprise Committee. 4. Appearance by Jeffrey Hale to Present Petition to the City Council Regarding the Location of the Crisis Center, 5, Resolutions: A. Consider Leasing City Property Located on the Northeast Corner of Dallas Drive and Willow Springs, to Coors-Golden Distributing Company to Af,commodate a Recycling Center. 6. Consider Contract with Black and Veatch, Consulting Engineers, for Miscellaneous Engineering Services for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Licensing Activities on Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville Hydroelectric Units. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 7. Consider Contract with Freese and Nichols for Engineering Evaluation of Location and Schedule for Water Treatment Piant Expansion, (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda october 5, 1982 Page Three 8. Consider Environmental Pcotection Agency Grant Amendment for Phase III of the Industrial Pretreatment Program. (The Public Utility Board recomm3nds approval.) 9, official Action of Executive Session Items: A, Legal Matters 1, Formal Action on Law Suit Settlement and Land Purchase Be Real Estate 1, Formal Action on Land Purchase C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 10, New Business: This item provides a section in which to suggest new itesus of business for future agendas. 041'10 .10 City Council Minutes September 14, 1992 Work Session of the Cl . ^f uentan City Council on Tuesday, September 146 1982, at S:U%l p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building to discuss the Capital Improvements Program. The Council then adjourned into Executive Session to discuss Legal Matters, Real -state, Personnel, and Board Appointments. The Council then convened into the Special Called Meeting at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro Tom Stephens, Council Members Barton, Hopkins, Alford, Riddlesperger, and Chew, City .Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary. ABSENT: None 1. Consent Agenda Hopkins asked for Item A.3 to be removed from the Consent Agenda. Riddlesperger motion, Stephens secc,Ad to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. City Manager Hartung reported tc the Council that the Staff would also like to remove Item A.3 from the Consent Agenda. Hopkins notion, Chew second to removt Item A.3 from the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Consent Agenda: A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid f 9039A Selective Weed Control 2. Bid 19041 3/4 Ton Cargo Van 3. Bid 19045 Bubble Bounce 2. The Council then received a report on TMPA. Dr. Roland Vela, Denton represeatatlve to the TMPA Board of Directors, gava the following report: a. At the annual meeting, the Manager of the Comanche Peak Plant had reported that the plant was on schedule time and money wise. b. A report from Navasota Mining for the Gibbons Creek plant was that there are 1286 million tons of lignite available for use with possible deposits of 60 to n million additional tons available. Navasota estimates that 804 of the deposit is capable of beleg mined. C. The Gibbons Creek plant is on schedule both time and money wise. The Turbine will roll on Sepptember 20 and the lignite will be fired in October or early NoYamber. The TMPA Board will extend an invitation to the City Council and the Public Utility Board to attend the firing. d. Bill Elkins, President of the Board of Directors, has resigned. He will continue until Jerry Ransom, the new Uirector, comes on board. Also new officers for the Board of Directors have been elected. } I L Ordinances: A. The Council considered approval of an ordnance setting the 1982 tax rate. The following ordinance was presented: 82.71 AN ORDINANCE L..VYING THE AD VALOREM TAX OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE YEAR 19821 AT THE RATE OF S.S100 PER $100.00 ASSESSED EVALUATION ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS Or- THE CITY ON JANUARY 1, 1982, NOT EXEMPT BY LAN; PROVID:NG REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF CURRENT MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, AND FOR INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON OUTSTANDING CITY OF DENTON BONDS; PROVIDING FOR LIMITED EXEMPTIONS OF CERTAIN HOMESTEADS; PROVIDING FOR ENFURC MNT OF COLLECTIONS; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Riddlesperger notion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. Or. roll call vote Barton„"ayu", Hopkins ''aye", Stephen"aye". "aye", Alford aye , Riddlesperger aye', Chew aye , and Mayor Mctio1 carried unanimously. B. The Council considered approval of an ordinance establishing appropriations for the 1982-83 City of Denton operating budget. the following ordina!ico was presented: 82.72 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OCTOBER It 19820 AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 309 1983; AND DECLARING &N EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens motion, Hopkins second to remove the storm water man.+gement portion of the ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye", C,ew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered approval of an ordinance revising the sanitation rates. The following ordinance was presented: 82.73 AN ORDINANCE AMENDI.HG CHAPTER 12 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON RELATING TO THE COLLECriUN OF GARBAGE, TRASH AND RUBBISH; RENAMING rHE HEAD OF THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT; RAISING THE FEES FOR USE OF SASITARY LANDFILL; PROVIDING FOR FEES FUR COLLECTION OF CERTAIN HOUSEHOLD GOODS; RAISING THE FEES FOR RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INSTItUTiONAL GARBAGE COLLECTION; DELETING PENALTIES FOR LATE PAYMENTS; RENUMBERING CERTAIN PROVISIONS THEREIN; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN (~UNF.ICT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DAIS. Riddlesperger motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "ay:", Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. U. The Council considered adoption of in ordinance E adjusting the ambulance fees. The following ordinanca Was presented: 82.15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON BY ADDING THERETO A NEW ARTICLE V RELATING TO EMERGENCY AMBULANCES AND SETTING FEES FAR SERVICES THEREOF; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "a~e", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye". Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye', and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered a proval of an ordinaace accepting a street dedication to serve the proposed school located adjacent to Evers Park. The following ordinance was presented: 82.15 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION BY DEED FROM BOB E. TRIPP AND DAVID E. TRIPP, TRUSTEES, OF CERTAI`? ZEAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE B.B.B. 6 C.R.R. COMPANf SORVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 186, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND RECORD:D IN VOLUME 996, PAGE 376 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF DENTON L^'::~cY TO THE CITY OF UENrm TEXAS, FOR THE USE OF SAID PROPEkTY AS A PUBLIC STREET AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Alford motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye". Riddlespergar "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 4. The Council considered approval of final payment to Schnell and Fields for surveying of right-of-way on Windsor D<ive. Assistant City Manager Svehla reported that the surveying had been completed but needed Council approval for final payment. Hopkins motion, Chew second to approve the final payment to Sc:ell and Fields. Motion carried unanimously. 5. The Council, received a report on home occupation in Deatan. Charlie Watkins of the Staff gave the report which included a portion of the toning ordinance and a pamphlet which is d0 tri:uted to citizens. Chew motion, Hopkins second to accept the report. Motion carried unanimously. 6. The Council discussed the development In the area near F,M-2181 and Sam Houston Elementary School. Svehla reported that information was in the agenda packets retarding paving, speed zones, etc. All the City has are preliminary plats which the M is reviewing. City is waiting for developers to develop the area. Barton motion, Hopkins second to proceed with development. Motion carried unanimously. 7. The Council received a report concerning the handicapped parking ordinance implementation. Watkins reported that the City was working out problems with implementation. Signs have been ordered and the blanks have been received. The sign overlays are to be received in the nett f=w weeks. After the overlays are put on the blanks, the legal signage requirements will be complete and enforcement of ordinance can begin. 8. The Council received a report on the abandoned vehicle ordinance enforcement program. Council Member Riddiesperger stated that the probl.m of abandoned vehicles had improved. 9. No official action was taken on Executive Session items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. . Personnel D. Board Appointments 10. The following items of new business were requested for future agendas: Stephens motion, Chew second to place Consent Agenda Item 2..k.4. from the September 7 agenda on the September 11 agenda for reconsideration. Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Alford "nay", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", Mayor "aye' Motion carried 6 to 1. Council Member Barton aske2 to re:eive a report on "non-houses" on September 21. Thu Council then adjourned into Executive Session at 8:00 P.Q. liTW6 07ST , KWUR 1,11Y SELRErM ALLEN, CRULIJUE 0423C r City council Minutes September 21, 1982 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, September 21, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building. 1. The Council discussed pending elections. City Attorney Taylor reported that due to provisions in the charter, the bingo election of January 15, 1983 and the proposed bond election could be held in one polling place, such as the Civic Center, Instead of in the single member districts. City Secretary will begin procedures through Justice Department to change polling place in District 2 from the Trinity Presbyterian Church to Flre Station 14. A discussion followed on the problem of redistricting and new precinct designations In view of the fact that the County has yet to have their redistricting accepted by the Justice Department s.nd that certain census information has not been forwarded to the cities. Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to hold the proposed bond and bingo elections at the Civic Center. Motion carried unanimously. 2. The Council discussed the 1982-83 budget from the Tax Appraisal District. Mayor Stewart reported that he and Hugh Mixon of the City Tax Office had attending the Public Hearing on the budget for the Tax Appraisal District and the Mayor expressed some concerns over the salary structure. Stephens suggested that the City's nominated joard member appear before the Council on September 28 to explain the budgut and answer any questions the Council might have. The Council convened into Executive Session to dis:uss Legal Matters, Real Estate, Personnel and Board Appointments. The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:10 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRF''dNT: Mayor Stewart, Mayor ?ro Tea Stephens, Council Members Barton, Hoppkins, Alford, Riddlesperger, and Chew; City Manager, Clty Attorney and City Secretary. ABSENT: None 1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of August 31, 1982 and the Regular Meeting of September 7, 1982. Hopkins motion, Chew second to approve the Minute i. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Consent Agenda Chew motion, Hopkins second to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Consent Agenda: A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Purchase Order 15339ti to Limitorque Corporation B. Replats: 1. Approval of the Final Replat of Lot 9•R, Block 3, Fry Addition. (The Planning and :oning Commission recommends approval.) 1 3. The Council recognized Mr. Robert Sage regarding an update of the status of the building located at 223 and 221 North Locust. Mr. Sage stated that he had appeared before the Council on July 20, 1982 regarding an inability of the City to enforce certain building codes and still ncthing had been done. City Attorney Taylor reported that the Building Inspector had made another inspection and that the two attorneys involved were negotiating. Taylor stated that code enforcement is a very broad subject. Mr. Sage stated that he anticipated this reponse and presented the Council with a hand-out. A. Public Hearings A. H-26. This is the petition of Mr. and Mrs. Robert L. Richardson requesting historic landmark (H) zonin designation at ISSS Lindsey Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) The Mayor opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Bullitt Lowery, Chairman of the Historic Landmark Conmis~ion, spoke in favor of the zoning designation stating that this wa; the first facidence of a home being moved from its original location before restoration, but that the relocation did not affect the validity of the request. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing. David Ellison stated that the Staff did not make a recommendation as they felt that the joint approval of the Historic Landmark Comission and the Planning and Zoning Commission was sufficient. 1. The Council considered adoption of an Ordinance designating the residence at ISSS Lindsey as a City of Denton Historic Landmark. H-26. The following ordinance was presented: 82-16 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE BELOW DESCRIBED LOCATION AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 80.30 (ARTICLE 28A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZUNISG ORDINANCE); AND PROVIDING FOR AS EFFt-.CTIVE DATE. Alford motion, Chew second to adopt the Ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. Z-1S58. This is the petition of L.A. Nelson representing Jupiter Transportation Company, requesting a change in zonin froe agricultural (A) to light industria' (LI) classification on a .S acre tract located on the west side of Ili 35W service road south of Airport Road. The Mayor opened the public Hearing. Mr. L. A. Nelson spoke in favor of 'he petition stating that he felt the intended usa of the property was compatible with the geographic area. No ore spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the Public hearing. Ellison of the Stafi stated that the area surrounding the tract was zoned and used as light industrial. 1. The Council considered adoption of an Ordinance changing the zoning from agricultural (A) to light Industrial (LI) classification on a 7.S acre tract located on the west side of IH 55W service road south of Airport Road. The following ordinance was presented: , 82.77 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.10 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 7.S ACRE TRACT OF LAND, MORE OR LESS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew notion, Barton second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye"a Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye"a and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. D-29. The Council considered approval of disposition of City property located along the east side of Mingo Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) The Mayor opened the Public Hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. Ellison of the Staff reported that this property was acquired in 1916 for the Mingo Road project. Property owners to the south have requested disposition. The property is zoned light industrial and includes a railroad spur on the easement which should be retained for use of other businesses. Ho kins motion, Stephens second to dispose of the property. On roll call vote Barton "aye"a Hopkins "aye" Stephens "aye", Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. S. The consider considered setting the rate increase for Cable TV services. City Manager Hartung told the Council that Public Hearings had 'wen hold so no further report would be given. Council Members Alford, Riddlesperger and Hopkins stated that they had received positive comments from citizens regarding the Golden Triangle Communications service to Denton. Alford notion, Hopkins second to instruct the City Attoiaey to draw the ordinance to grant the full increase requested by Golden Triangle Communications and to bring the ordinance back to the Council. Motion carried unanimously. t 6. The Council considered closing a section of Pecan Street { from Cedar to Elm. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) Assistant City Manager Svehla stated that this closing was far a 12 to 15 month period during construction activities at the new Police Administration Building. The Staff anticipated a permanent :losing of the street at a later date. Hopkins motion, Alford second to close the section of Pecan Street from Cedar to Elm until construction was completed. Motion carried unanimously. T. The Council considered approval of a lease/purchase of the existing word processing equipment. (The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval.) Finance Director Mc\ary reported that the City had used the Yang word processing equipment for 3 years and the Mang OIS system for 1 year. The City now has a iease credit accural of $30,000 toward the purchase of the equipment. The Micro-Computer Task Force and the Data Processing Advisory Board both recommend approval of the purchase. Stephens motion, Hopkins second to ar,prove the lease/purchase. Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered authorization of payment for aoving expenses for the Utility Department Assistant Director of Mater/Wastewater Department. Assistant City Manager McKean reported that the moving expenses xere awarded to the lowest bidder. Barton motion, Hopkins second to authorize the payment. Motion carried unanimously. 9. The Council then took up the reconsideration of September T, 1982 Consent Agenda item 2.A.4, Bid f 9046. Council Member Stephens stated that the referenced renovations had raised questions regarding the security of vault records. The renovations were underway so the reconsideration was no longer valid. 10. There was no official action on Executive Session iteas: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 11. New Business Council Member Chew requested a reconsideration of the budget item on funding of the Domino Hall. The Council then convened into Executive Session. RICHARD 0. a %LkYOR emu' r , M 1 7Z'if AIY 0425C w City Council Agenda Summary Sheet Meeting Date: October 5, 1982 Agenda Item 0: Subject: Bid 09048 Transformer Repairs Summary: This bid is for the repair of transformers belonging to the City of Denton that are in one of the three listed categories and the repair cost does not exceed the maximum allowed as specified for each size and type. This bid will run from October 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983, with one year extension, only if agreeable to both parties. Some transformers when removed will 'so be classified as not suitable for repair becaus. f age or when there is a complete burn out. Action Required: Approval by Council. Alternatives: Not repair transformers and/or T,rchase new transformers. Source of Funds: Budget Recommendation: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder Van-Trap Electric Corp. as shown on the tabulation sheet. We have used past repairs and find that the percentage of repairs as applied to each category, as shown on the tabulation sheet. As you can see 802 of our repairs will to in category 111. Exhibits: Tabulation sheet Memorandum from Ernie Tullos, Asst. Director of Utilities Memorandum from John Overstreet, Electric Distribution Y Submitti+d By: .P *Puraing r a, C.MAgent BID f 9048 BID Transformer Repair Greenvill Lone San Alamo Van-Trap OPEN Sept. 16. 1982 Transform r Star Angelo Transf. Electric Co. Transf Electric Co. Corp. ACCOUNT Budget Co. Service Co. QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENfDOR Basic a air CATEGORY 1 price-conventional &Yerage 1409 170.09 _ 160.91 172.27 240.72 P 73.33 8 4 8 94.17 134.00 Pad mount 367.14 451.96 386.14 426.42 19166.21 Total (5%) 580.47 695.63 641.88 692.79 10540.83 2. Medium Overhaul CATEGORY II Average price- conventional 218.63 200.00 345.00 294.55 283.09 CSP 124.16 94.33 203.00 160.17 156.67 Pad mount 491.43 incomplet 908.00 864.29 19327.79 Total (152) 834.22 1456.90 1319.01 1767.55 3. Major Overhaul CATEGORY III Average rice - conventional 941.45 895.20 1281.64 1054.45 843.55 CSP 395.00 361.66 531.83 430.17 350.17 Pad mount 2405.00 2406.21 2888.71 2953.71 2259.00 Totals 80X 3741.45 3663.07 4702.18 4429.33 3452.72 Grand Total 5.156.14 61800.96 61441.13 6s761.10 Evaluated Total 32147.31 4s012.37 3,777.95 31099.55 Delivery 45 days 45 days 21-35days 120 days 45 days CITY OF DENTON M E M O R A N D U M T0: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent FROM: E. B. Tullos, Assistant Director of.Utilities DATE: September 21, 1982 RE: Bid 190481 September 16,, 19821 Transformer Repair This bid is for annual estimated repair of Electric Distribution transformers which may fail in service during the next year. Evaluation of the bids were made based on 56 of transformers to be repaired to be Category It 158 to be Category II and 80% to be Category 111, The Van Tran bid averaged $617.39 per unit for` Category III type repair which is $185.02 below the next lowest bidder. Therefore, the overall bid of.Van Tran is recommended to be accepted and permit the contractor to use refined oil rather than requiring new oil to be furnished. R rds, E. B. Tullos Assistant Director of Utilities EST/cg cc: Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities John Overstreet, Electric Distribution File CITY OF DENTON M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ernie Tullos, Assistant Director of Utilities FROM: John Overstreet, Electric Distribution DATE: September 21, 1982 RE: Trans2ormer Repair Bid Evaluation I The bid evaluation on transformer repair was completed this date. The evaluation was based on each category of bids estimated as Category I - 5t, Category II - 15% and Category III - 80% of total transformers requiring repair as stated on Page 2 of Hid #9048. Two vendors complied with tha bid request very close. They were Alamo Transformers, 4931 Space Center Drive, San Antonio, Texas and San Angelo Electric, Post Office Box 1589, San Angelo, Texas. The Alamo Transformer Company failed to meet the 45-day delivery specified in Paragraph 24.0, Page 14. Van Tran Electric Corporation, 7711 Imperial Drive, Waco, Texas complied except they quoted refined oil in Categories II and III, with new oil as an option. The bid evaluation eliminated Greenville 'Transformer Company and Lone Star Transformers for failure to include oil in the bid for Categories II and IIi. The lowest bidder for Category III was Van Tran Electric Corporation which recommended refined oil in the bid, therefore would save the City an estimated average of. $55 to $75 over new oil in their bid. Their bid of an average $617.39 per I estimated unit was $318.26.below the next lowest bidder. Recommendation, based on the evaluation, is to accept the Van Tran bids for all categories and change the contract and permit use of refined oil. Regards, S! (o John Overstreet Electric Distribution JO/cg cc: File City Council Agenda Summary Sheet Meeting Date: October 5, 1982 Subject: Purchase order 054329 Summary: This is for a emergency purchase order for the repair of the transmission on our equipment number 2450, a caterpillar compactor. This compactor is used on a daily basis at our present landfill and with the limited capacity we must continue its use. It was therefore necessary to receive the emergency repairs. Action Required: Approval of emergency repairs on purchase order 54329. Budget repairs and maintenance Source of Funds Recommendation: We recommend this purchase order be approved for the emergency repairs to J b S Equipment Service, as presented by the City Mainenance staff, for the total amount of $11,565.55. Exhibits: Purchase Order 054329 Invoice Submitted By: U X4 - a-40a, e, oh J rshall, C.P.M. Purc acing Agent CITY OF DENTON. PURCHASING DEPT. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 54329 216 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 156"311 DtM Metro 287-0042 oATa 8-3-82 no "a. vuaools la. nom W10. NO. DR "T ACCT. "o' 05-98-87-10 3 b S Equip. Service SHr To: CITY Of DENTON Vehicle Maint. SHOW P.O.NO.ON ALL SHIPMENTS, OE LIVERY TICKETS,INVOICES ETC.SEND INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, THE CITY OF OE.ITON, TEXAS IS EXEMPT FROM SALES TAX AS PER HOUSE BILL 020.THE CITYOF DENTON IS PROHIBITED FROM PAYWO FOR MERCHANDISE SiEFOAE IT IS RECEIVED. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE F.O.B., CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS. ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION QUANdUNIT PRICE AMOUNT 02450 check transmission and repair as necessary estimat d 119907.12 Labor (68,5 hours shop time) 1,507 (25.5 hra. reg, field time) 650.00 (8.15 hra. field overtime) o q%025.13 Milage (242 miles) I,~{ T 145.20 Outside labor 'SON D tj L1Cp' 27.50 ?arts °ODO 140 80910.E Tax NONE 'T'OTAL AMOUNT DUE: $11,565. 5 Inv. 40822 Direct All inquiries To: CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT, John J. Marshall, C.P.M., Purchasing Agent Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M., Asst. Purchasing Agent s = J S Equipment service Inc, 1504IJackson St. P.O. Box 338 Carrollton, Texas 75006 office Shop Metro 471.9908 242.9443 City of Denton Invoke NO. 0822 215 1dcKinnev Dats:8•-19-82 Denton, Texas 76201 Model Sertal No. EO No. Cuat r P.O. No. Cat 8161 52U 1 2 0 James Bostick 29 Description: T and I engine and transmission, bring to shop and repair as estimated Labor (68.5 hrs. shop time) $ 1,507.00 (25.5 hrso rege field time) 650025 (8,15 hrso field overtime) 325*13 14ilage(242 miles) 27.50 Outside labor e $,910e47 Farts Tax NONE__ TOTAL A14OU14T DUE $11065e 55 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA j BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 5, 1982 Subject: Approval of the final replat of Lot 10 and 11, Block ?1, Owsley Park Addition. Summary: The subject property- is located at the northeast corner of Bonnie Brae and East Prairie Street. The zoning is multi- family (MF-1), and the intent of the replat is to eliminate a lot line, thus creating a one lot subdivision. South- western Bell. Telephone Company recently acquired this property to facilitate the development of telephone line and exchange switching or relay station. The replat meets technical requirements of the subdivision regulations and the zoning; is adequate for the proposed development. Action Required: Approval of the final replat. Alternative: Approval of the final replat. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission unani- mously recommends approval of the final replat. Exhibits: 1. Reduced plat 2. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of September 15, 1982 David Ellison Development Review Planner ohm AP 6R.0HC SCALE .e FEET syVtJ t 4Sxt LocON W is 1fJ I ~ SITE f- _ :,,.1., ac[ s raise, a [opsI a [ 010 i l,OT /OR a' BLOCK I/ OWSL£Y PARK DD/TION o o ~ W 1 s A N , sCO•+ ~r~. w .so Ps 's w o °s~ a N s~ W z z 0 4f I , j r w=st s.N rasa iN Pp.tlk~E SfRE,~T. _ _ Lot IO R BLOCK II l , OWSLEY PARK ADDITION P9rM Ldan srawc ty:14f fno'0t! it L `1F.`,:C? Dan+on,Dxnion Coun Y,re.os scar[ a.v sr.~: er Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission September 15, 1982 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denion, Texas was held on Wednesday, September 15, 1982, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building. Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr., Marilyn Gilchrist, Gary Juren, Robert LaForte and Andy Sidor Absent: None Present from Staff: Charles Watkins, Senior Planner; Steve Fanning, Comprehensive Planner; David Ellison, Development Review Planner; Greg Edwards, City Engineer; Jerry Clark, Civil Engineer, and Audrey Bachman, secretary Chairman Robert LaForte called the meeting to order. 1. Approval of the minutes of the September 1, 1982 regular meeting. Ms. Gilchrist moved to approve minutes of the regular meeting of September 1, 1982. Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried. II. Public Hearing itpproval of the final replat of lots 10 and 11, block 11, Owsley Park Addition. Mr. Ellison explained that property is located at the corner of Bonnie Brae and Prairie and is zoned MF-1. He said the purpose of replat is to eliminate lot line creating a one lot subdivision, that Southwestern Bell Telephone Company recently acquired the property to develop a telephone relay 3 - III tc. 'c~l r'r'gUl!'.''lznt (111d x C~ nic•il s op7ent Revier+ Co mittee recommends appruval. On question, he said staff asked for information about proposed building but no plans were. presented. No one was present in favor or in opposition to request. Chair declared public hearing closed. Ms. Gilchrist moved to recommend approval of replat of lots 10 ana 11, block 119 Owsley Park Addition. Seconded by C Mr. Escue and unanimously carried. (7-0) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 5, 1982 Subject: Approval of the final plat of Jupiter Industrial Park. Summary: A zoning change from agricultural (A) to light industrial (LI) classification was recently approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council on a 7.5 acre tract located on the west side of I.H.-35 W. service road approximately 1560 feet south of Airport Road (FM 1515). In accordance with City of Denton requirements, this final subdivision plat has been sub- mitted for review and approval so that development can begin at this site. Ade- quate water, sewer and electrical service is available for extension to this site and public access is provided from the I.H.-35 W. service road. Action Required: Approval of the final plat. Alternative: Approval of the final replat. Recommendation: unThe ani- mously a recommends z approval of s the n final plat. Exhibits: 1. Reduced plat 2. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of September 29, 1982 David Ellison Development Review Planner r i I , gyp,, ~ +e r, {If SITTER LOCATION MAP / 4 r 40T Iv9C.41 J r e J 4 ,IdrCff ~!,CUS1FrdL Cd S[ w'~a r1pNf Car /0 9!! A It Ila 0:4 te , ~ - - .rl s :ra .43 $ilaPciac - rc..ct, r i • ~ 10 ,at ativ COPP f \S 'n A 'w lu !7 041 aV 4 , i au•rJ, t2u~* ~ ~j i', ary.Etti~T7, „Ce r n. l n. a~ !r . r ► ~ 19• )1 30 f a r *k *44 I r M1 _1 iO1 Jl / t, pr f KAT REALTY CCAP, 64dfH~r SCdif ^ Afrr C, too 661 Frn61 Plot LOT I BLOCK I JUPITER INDUSTRIAL PARK eernq iSZ9acresin Ire0SBrertter Sur A-56 De'ronto,~t f, f77as A+I~sr li,19et Minutes Planning & Zoning Commission September 29, 1962 Page 4 B. Approval of the final plat of Jupiter Industrial Park. Mr. Ellison explained request stating this was a recent zoning change from agricultural "A" to light industrial "LI" on a 7.5 acre tract located on I.H. 35-W service road (UNAPPROVED) south of Airport Road. He said that Development Review Committee recommends approval, that plat meets requirements and corrections have been made. L. A. Nelson was present in support of the request. Mrs.Gilchrist moved to recommend approval of final plat of Jupiter Industrial Park. Seconded by Mr. Escue and unani- mously carried. October 5, 1982 • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Consider Change Order fl- Contract A to Cullum Construction Company- for Hickory reek ewer Line Project. Project #DNT82030- Contract C-48-1188 A SUMMARY: Cullum Construction Company has requested a change order as follows: 1. to increase the diameter of some of the boring casing, 2. to reduce the size of some of the casing, 3. to install some casing where the plans did not call for casing. FISCAL SUMMARY: Previous contract amount $1,872,807.80 Revised contract amount $1,872,807,80 Net increase- decrease NO CHANGE ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or disapproval of subject change order #1, Contract A, by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Freese and Nichols, Inc., and the Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 229 19829 recommended to the City Council approval of the change order at no charge to the City, Respectfully, R. E, Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Change Order #I- Contract A 1218U/5 SIMON W. A"S". r,t ' JAN[S R. NIclook r%. AOWIT L NICI/OS.S L[Lb.FPICLS[, ► ,►.L tt t r E S E A N A D 11, i * l!O L S IN t. , F1 I C 1, I IN C. JOC PAUL JOSE S. ISCL K L ROBEAT A. TNOyftON w, r.[. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S JO[ W MwL3, rC OCI[ C. ALUM. P.C June 4, 1992 N H CO KAC., r.L JOHN M. COOK, P 1.L. T. ANTHONY ktiD, P.C. GMY N. PE[vC3. P.C. Cullum Construction Company, Inc. P. 0. Box 5455 Dallas, Texas 75205 Re: Denton, Texas Interceptor Sewers Change Order No. 1 Gentlemen: Attached, please find eight (8) copies each of Change Order No. 1 for both Contract "A" and Contract 'a'. These change orders cover -.he changes in casing requirements for highway and railroad borings on the referenced project. Please execute all eight (8) copies of each change order and forward them to Mr. Robert E. Nelson,, Director of Utilities, City of Denton for execution by the owner. Two executed copies will be returned to you for your files. t Yours very truly, FREES£ AND NICHOLS, INC. J2..4S..-4 Elvin C. Copeland, P.E. , ECC:jd xc4, R. E. Nelson Earl Jones Coy Peach TELEPHONE rill ]]6•7f6'J !SS LAMAR STREET FOOT \YOnT1f, TLXAS 70 Sot CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORDER • PPOJECT: OT14 82030, Sanitary Sewer Lines CONTRACT: C-48-1188; Contract "A" OWNER: City of Denton, Texas CONTRACTOR: Cullum Construction Company CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE: June 2, 1982 CHANGE FOR EXTRA WORK TO BE PERFORMED The following changes in size and/or type of casing for underground crossing of public roads and railroads shall be made: CONTRACT REQUIREMENT X-ING PLAN CARRIER CASING AUTHORIZED CHANGE NO. SHT. DIA. LENGTH DIA. LENGTH E 7 24" 110, NONE - No Change EE 8 24" 321 NONE - No Change F 12 24" 102' 42" 84' No Change G 17 24" 100, 40" 82' Increase to 42" R.C.P. H 20 24" 190' 40" 120' Increase to 42" R.C.P. + P 31 16" ISO, NONE - install 42" R.C.P. Q 31 16" 152' NONE - Install 42" R.C.P. Previous contract amount $1,872,607.80 Nei(Increass)(decrease)in contract amount No Change Revised contract amount $19872,807.80 Net(increose)(decrease)in contract time of completion No Change Revised contract time of completion 365 Ci lendar Days Recommended by Approved by OWNER FREESE AND NICHOLS By By . 0 ~i,lrreuree: Approved by CONTRACTOR I - O.na I Cenli~ele► I F. N. Oltlc4 B ~ I--lt,i. Enq. X- . October 5, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #3A-2. SUBJECT: Consider Change Order fl- Contract C to Cullum Construction Company- for Hickory reed ewer nF e 7roject. Project tDNT82030- Contract C-48-1188 C SUMMARY: Cullum Construction Company has requested a change order as follows: to make a change in size and type of casing for underground crossings on public roads and railroads. Cullum Construction agrees to install some casing that was not required on the plans at no cost to the City. FISCAL SUMMARY: Previous contract amount $21144,188.00 Revised contract amount $21144,188.00 Net increase- decrease NO CHANGE ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or disapproval of subject change order dl, Contract C, by City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Freese and Nichols, Inc., and the Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 22, 19821 recommended to the City Council approval of the change order at no charge to the City. Respectfully, l )JiLo R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Change Order #I- Contract C 1218U/6 SIMON W.,RE[S[, t,L JA4E6 R. NICHOLS. PX R061A? L. NICHOLS.tC ~V H LEE 15 FREESE. OIL ~t (1 r r IN D n 110 ROBERT 5 COOCH ' E ~r ' K b E S E A 1 C C L S, 1 1 E. JOE PAUL JONES. PX ROBERT A THOMPSON W. PL C O N S L' L 1 I N G E N G I N E E 4 S JOE N. MAWYS, P,E. ( OCI[ C. ALLP4 P.C W. ERNES?CLt W1N?,PG June 4, 1932 EL.•IN C, COPELAHO, P,C. • JOHN H COOK, P.c T. ANTHO" RE10, P.I. CARY N. AEEVES, P.E Cullum Construction Company, Inc. P, 0. Box a455 Dallas, Texas 75205 Re: Denton, Texas Interceptor Sewers Change Order Ho. 1 Gentl eme : Attached, please find eight (8) copies each of Change Order Vo. 1 for both Contract "A" and Contract "El". These change orders cover the changes in casing requirements for highway and railroad borings on the referenced project. Please exzcui:e all eight (8) copies of each change order and forward them to M• . Robert E. Nelson, Director of Utilities, City of Denton for execution by the owner. Two executed copies will be returned to you for your files. • Yours very truly, F'REESE AND NICHOLS) INC. CC Elvin C. Copeland, P:E. ECC:jd xc: R. E. flel son Earl Jones Coy Veach TELIPH0HE 9 1 7 !36.716) 0 11 LAPA AA S I R C E 7 or on i Won rHi ?ERAS 76102 CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORDER • PROJECT: DTN 82032, Sanitary Serer Lines CONTRACT: C-48-1188; Contract "C" OWNER: City of Denton, Texas CONTRACTOR: Cullum Construction Company CHANGE ORDS2 NO. 1 DATE: June 2, 1982 CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK TO BE PERFORMED The following changes in size and/or type of casing for underground crossing of public roads and railroads shall be made: CONTRACT REOUIREMENT X-ING PLI CARRIER CASING AUTHORIZED CHANGE NO. SHT. D IA. LENGTH DIA. LENGTH A 5 20" 60' NONE - No Change B 5 20" 111' NONE - Install 42" R.C.P. • C 6 20" 325.5' 36" 210' increase to 42" R.C.P. D 6 20" 99' 36" 95' Increase to 42" R.C.P. 1 20 24" 80' NONE - Install 42" R.C.P. J 22 20" 58' 36" 54' 42" R.C.P. (or 26" Steel) K 23 18" 58' 34" 54' Reduce to 26" Steel L 24 12" 69' 26" 65' Reduce to 18" Steel M 26 12" 58' 26" 54' Reduce to 18" Steel N 28 10" 58' 24" 54' Reduce to 16" Steel 0 30 10" 98' 24" 94' Reduce to 16" Steel R 33 16" 80' 30" 80' Reduce to 24" Steel S 24 16" 130' NONE - Install 24" Steel (or 42" R.C.P.) T 34 16" 94' 30" 90' Increase to 42" R.C.P. U 34 16" 4721 30" 470' Increase to 42" R.C.P. V 35 12" 51' 26" 57' Reduce to 18" Steel N 36 16" 90' 30" 88' Reduce to 24" Steel X 37 1211 83' 26" 83' Reduce to 18" Steel Y 39 18" 90' 34" 86' Increase to 42" R.C.P. Z 40 16" 107' 30" 105' Reduce to 24" Sceel OTN-82032 Sanitary Sewer Lines C-48-1188, Contract "C" Change Order No. 1 Sheet 2 of 2 Previous contract amount $29144,188.00 Nof(increase)(d*crease)In contract amount No Change Revised contract amount $2,1449188.00 Not (increase)(deeroes a)in contract lions of completion No Change Revised contract time of completion 365 Calendar Days Recommended by Approved by OWNER FREESE AND NICHOLS By By Didritau}Ien~ Approved by CONTRACTOR I - owfw . I - CentOS? I.-- F, AN. Offte• ` Jt I-R~i. Enq, October 5, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Consider Change Order #2- Contract A- from Cullom Construction Company. Project ODNT82030- Contract C-48-1185 A SUMMARY: Cullom Construction Company has requested a change order for the following items: 1) Install elevated crossing in lieu of type no. 2 concrete encasement at station 502 + 85 on Hickory Creek interceptor. Decrease of - $ 972.20 2) Man hole e's 218 and 21D were omitted to allow the property owner to plow the land and does not interfere with the operation of the 27" line. Decrease of - $3,012.00 3) To relocate manhole #2 at Station 8 + 43. This would dove the bore pit 22' further away from the railroad embankment where heavy rainshed caused erosion. Increase of + $39081.20 NET CHANGE - $ 903.00 ACTION REQUIRED: City Council approval or disapproval of subject change order. RL";SOMMENDATION: Freese and Nichols, Inc., and the Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 22, 1982, recommended to the City Council approval of the change order representing a total decrease of $903.00, Respectfully.., R.E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHI81T I Change Order #2-Contract A- Cullom Construction Co. Letter from Freese & Nichols, Inc., 9/i/82 1278U/7 SIMON W. rREtSL ► [ . . JAMES R. NICHOL$, P,[. . J2 ROBERT L NICH04 S. ► t LEE B ►Atclt. P c. FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. JOii~ULJONrl,Pt.t' ROBERT A. THOMPSON LIP. . C O N S V L T I N G E N 6 1 N F E R S JO[ B NAPts, ►.t. OCIC C. ALLEN. P.C. W. ERNEST CLEMENT, P,c. ELVIN C. COPELANO, P.T. JOHN H. COOK, P.C. T. ANTHONY PEI*. P.C September 1. 1982 GARY N. 4t[VTS PA. Cullom Construction Co., Inc. P. 0. Box 8455 Dallas, Texas 15205 Re: Denton, Texas , Interceptor Sewers-Contract A Change Order No. 2 Gentlemen: Attached please find eight (8) copies of Change Order No. 2 to your Contract "A" of the Denton Interceptor Sewer project. This Change Order covers the changing of one of the creek crossings from the below ground type to the elevated type changing the length of the boring underneath Ve railroad embankment on the coed lift station line and the deletion of two manholes on the Burch property. Please sign all eight (8) copies of the Change Order and forward them to Mr. R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities, Cityy of Denton, for execution by the City. A fully executed copy will be returned to you for your files. Please call if you have any questions. Yours very truly, FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. Elvin C. Copeland, P.E. ECC:ce Enclosures xe: R. E. Pelson Earl Jones Coy 'leach TELEPHONE 617 336.7141 SI1 LAMAR STREET PORT WORTHo TEXAS 76 105 CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORDER • PROJECT: DTN-82030, Sanitary Sewer Lines CONTRACT: C-48-1188; Contract "A" OWNER: City of Denton, Texas CONTRACTOR; Cullum Construction Company CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 DATE: 27 August 1982 CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK TO BE PERFORMED The follvaing Changes Shall Be Made: A. Install Elevated Crossing in Lieu of Type No. 2 Concrete Encasement at Sta. 502+85 on Hickory Creek Interceptor (Sht. p19) as per attached: UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION UANTITY COST INCREASE DECREASE 1. 27" V.C. Pipe, 0'/6' 48 L.F. $ 44.00 $ - $ 21112.00 2. 2711-V.C. Pipe, 61/8' 8 L.F. 44.20 - 353.60 • 3. 27" Y C Pipe, 81/10' 8 L.F. 44.60 - 356.80 4. 27" Y.C. Pipe, 10'/12' 2 L.F. 45.20 90.40 5. 27" V.C. Pipe, 121/14' 2 L.F. 46.70 93.40 6. 27" Y.C. Pipe, 141/16' 4 L.F. 47.50 - 190.00 34. 24" Ductile Iron Pipe 72 L.F. 36.00 29592.00 - 35. Std. 6-Ft. Piers 3 Ea. 15100.00 31300.00 - 36. Vertical Pier Extension 22 L.F. 44.00 968.00 - 51. Type #1 Conc. Encasement 32 L.F. 27.00 864.00 - 53. Type f2 Conc. Encasement 50 L.F. 110.00 - 51500.00 SUBTOTALS $ 79724.00 S 81646.20 B. Omit Manhole Nos. 21B and 21D on the Hickory Creek Interceptor (Sht. =38) as per Merwrand Dated 8/7/82: 46. Std. 4' Dia. Manholes 2 Ea. S 850.00 $ - $ 1,700.00 47. Extra Depth Std. 14H 16 L.F. 82.00 - 11312.00 SUBTOTALS $ - $ 3,012.00 Sht. =1 of 2 C. On the CO-ED Lift Station Interceptor (Sht. 031), Relocate Manhole No. 2 Southwesterly 22 Feet to Sta. 8+43 and Begin Bore Under Railroad Embank- ment at this Point, as per Attached Memorandum Dated 7/24/82: UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION UAQ NTITY COST INCREASE DECREASE 24. 15" P.V.C. Pipe, 8'/10' 14 L.F. $ 17.00 S - $ 238.00 25. 15" P.V.C. Pipe, 104/12' 8 L.F. 17.60 140.80 38. 16" Ductile Iron Pipe 22 L.F. 21.00 462.OG - 45. Bored Crossing "Q" 22 L.F. 140.00 39080.00 - 47. Extra Depth Std. MH 1 L.F. 82.00 82.00 SUBTOTALS S 3,542.00 S 460.80 TOTAL A110UNT OF CHANGES $11,266.00 $12,169.00 NET CHANGE (Decrease) $ 903.00 Previous contract amount $1,872,807.80 Net(iaoreos*)(decrease)in contract amount 903.00 Revised contract amount $1,8/1x904.80 Not(Increase)(decreose)in contract time of completion No Change Revised contract lime of completion 365 Calendar Days Recommerd*d by Approved by OWNER FREESE AND NICHOLS ey • Oirtribulion: Approved by CONTRACTOR I -Owner 1-C0011ctor I - F. AN. OiRce I-Res. Eng. OTN-82030 sy C.O. No. 2 Sht. 02 of 2 Y v-) T. c= mou GRouND SCtRF'AC FrtoM 1~ •~(.'.lGi1-1AL `'?ctRYG1VVE YA1 L oTf Gl,S 1ril 7'i$D (frjoStA~:C~ f ~iCA~~S: toRZ. {lt= to, vin-r. In ' 1 i 660 ' 1 r ~ l C G ' 1 / J ci 0' >n x ~ o N N o~ o b i RbM @ 0.2d • -.per 1i1v32T SdQti3 isiYrRT 5M4.34-' `1~ TY{'z Nb1 CONC ~r7i 5~5 SNCRSrM 'z- rs (~AGN S{4:.~ 4 ~ o N N Gttnu6~ORp ; I~(°? N p t O L. ,,e.... C'Q' 8 'iy6 J40 vi- RISILS r. r6 a V. 537 Cu LL U J,-I Cc 4° 50215 jO 70 80 quo 5o3f oo ` 2e'H&tt' ea ~eteuce ~nlet~itise ~omnttl~ee Director: Ellyn Jo Miller Treasurer: Roger Williams Coordinator: Randy Newton September 30, 1982 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: Attached is a report to the Denton City Council prepared by Dr. Stephen M. Gorman of the Political Science Department, North Texas State university, on behalf of the Denton Area Service Enterprise Committee (DASEC). The purpose of this report is to bringbefore the City Council information relating to some of the economic and social impacts of the July 1981 ordinance requiring 12 midnight closings for bars and clubs. The Denton Area Service Enterprise Committee is an association of Denton b+!sinesspersons formed in April 1982 to promote a favorable community environment for entertainment enterprises (including private clubs). It is the desire of DASEC to work constructively with the City of Denton to maintain both the quality of our community life and a healthy climate for private investments in the alcoholic beverage industry. The attached report is intended to bring to light the negative consequences of 12 midnight closings in terms of employment and business income. It also suggests that the anticipated gains from early closing times may, in fact, rot have been at" ined. Finally, a survey of Denton City residents' attitudes on the isilie is presented that farms the basis for several alternative proposals put forward by DASEC. Respectfully, AO0411 Randy0evton DASEC Coordinator 809 Sunset, Denton, Texas 76201 Overview of the Issue P,elations between certain sectors of the Denton business community and the City Council concerning closing times for private clubs have been strained for the past year and a half. Three important reasons for this have been: 1) original confussion among club owners over the intentions of the City Council, 2) the political immaturity of an unrepresentative group of interested businesspersons, and 3) a lack of relevant information. This report attempts to make a first step toward resolving the third problem (the first two having more or less resolved themselves). The principal arguments in favor of early bar/club closing hours include the foiloving: 1. The operation of establishments that sell alcohol increases the risk of various forms of crime. Hence, the less hours they operate, the less crime. 2. To the extent that the sale of alcohol in bars and clubs may increase crime, it constitutes a drain on city resources (i.e., police services) ghat tan be limited by reduced operating hours. 3. The consumption of alcohol in public places after certain hours constitutes inappropriate behavior for this community, and should therefore be regulated, 4. Private clubs are not an economic or social asset to the community as a whole. While statement number three is a normative evaluation that cannot be debated in host circumstances, the other four assertions can be tested. We will turn first to the question of the economic impact of early closings. ' ]nst Iurloymont and Rusiaees Income "he sale of mixed drinks in Denton is a $3,000,000 a year industry which generates not only tax revenue for the city and provides employment for residents, but also stimulates the local economy, With an average propensity to consume of 415ths throughout the community as a whole, an industry directly generating $3 million will stimulate up to $15 million in overall economic activity for a contained economy. According to repom s from bar/club owners, business has declined since the July 1981 ordinance. From a mailing of twenty•fiye, eleven owners responded. Of that number, seven reported declines in business receipts averaging 26 percent since July 1981. At. least a portion of that lost business has gone outside the city, thereby causing both direct and indirect (multiplier effect) loses for the local economy. Future city receipts of its share of the 10 percent gross receipts tax on private clubs (the city receiving 15 percent of this amount) will provide a basis for exactly measuring the overall decline in economic activity. Table 2 shows the history of Fiscal Year Collections of tl.is tax. A $1000 decline in this tax will indicate a $67,000 decline in direct earnings by clubs, and a potential decline of about $335,000 of expenditures in the local economy (expenditures that are subject to other city taxes, such as saleo taxes, for example). In practice, it may turn out that gross receipt taxes simply do not rise as fast as in the past, which would indicate lost potential growth. A more direct consequence of early closings has been lost employment. Nine businesses reported reductions in weekly employee hours of 771, and the termination of 19 employees in response to declines in business. On this basis, it is estimated that the overall reduction in weekly employment hours exceeds 1,300. and that as many as 35 workers have lost employment (others merely having their working hours reduced). While this is a small number, it indicetes a negative direction in a time of high unemployment. Just as importantly, future employment opportunities have been lost as owner: have cancelled plans for expansion or the opening of second businesses -3- TABLE 1 Surrey of Business and Employnent Impacts of Early Club Closinga Number of Clubs Answering Survey Questionaire: 11 Average Time in The Business: 6 years, 2 months Total Number of Employee Hours Reported Lost Per week: 771 Total Number of Employees Reported Let Go After Ordinance: 19 Average PeCl+.ne in Business (of Seven Reporting Clubs): 26% in Weekly Receipts Number Reporting that Ordainare Negatively Affected lutu;e Beainess Plans: 8 (see appendix). A negative business climate is perceived, which at a minimum will retard the growth of such entertainment business, and may lead to an actual decline. It is also possible that early closings, to the extent that they have impacted public bars that stayed open bast 12 midnight (or reduced the "breakfast" crowd at restaurant.u that served late night drinkers) have reduced the collection of sales t.ixes from certain types of business. Information is being sent from the State Comptroller's office on this point which will be supplied to the Council at a later date. Private Clubs and Crime/Police Services Even if the economic I-mpje%ance of private clubs for the local economy is accepted, it may still be oblected that they pose police problems. This was an import%nt argument in support of the July 1981 ordinance. The three most ccmmon cells to the police department concerning, bar9/clubs are dittrubance, drunk, and fight calls. ("Calls" )R1E:o includes activities by the police at a location vitho•.:t a call actually having been placed ty a resident or business person.) It was suggested in July 1981 that earlier closing tithes would likely reduce the number TABLE 2 Fiscal Year Collection History for City's Share of Mixed Beverage Tax F sc&I Year Asount 1971-72 $ 3,764 1972-73 $ 61863 1973-74 $ 9,648 1974-75 $i4,109 1975-76 $18,304 1976-77 $19,675 1977-78 $22,795 1978-79 $30,539 4 1979-80 $33,132 1980-81 $379694 1c,81-82 $42,000 (Estimate) 1982-83 $46,000 (Estimate) SOURCE: City of Denton Annual Budget -5- of police calls to clubs and bars. This has not been the case. An examination of the police calls for the three most common problems to six of Denton's most popular clubs during the second quarters of 1981 and 1982 shows that nothing was gained by 12 midnight closings in this regard. The total number of calls at the addresses of these six clubs increased by over 90 percent, and police calls within one block of these clubs remained essentially the same between the 1981 period and the 1982 period (see Tables 3 and 4). It may be possible that the increased "problems" result in part from the early closings themselves. The frustration factor of individuals who want to continue their evening's entertainment is an area worth studying, but it is beyond the scope of this report. It is also possible that there has been an increase in the number of people driving to Dallas for an evening out who return a considerable distance under the influence of alcohol (DKIs have increased within the patrol area of the local DPS office by about 50 percent in the past year, but a slight change in manpower may explain a small portion of this increase), Overall, the number of police calls for disturbances, drunkeness, and fighting throughout the city increased between the second quarter of 1981 and the same period in ?.982• A comparison of Tables 3 and 4 suggests that the percentage of Disturbance and Drunkeness calls accounted for by private clubs within the city as a whole is quite small. But more importantly, the available evidence does not support the notion that closing clubs early reduces the need for T)nllce services, which in any event are not that nuneroue to begin with. Public minion At bottom, the entire issue of the appropriate closing times for pri,•ate -6- TABLE 3 Comparison of Police Calls At and Near Six Clubs, Second Quarter 1981 and Second Quarter 1982 9ype of Call Disturbance Drunk Fight Total At Club Addresses in 1961 11 8 3 22 tt Club Addresses in 1982 !a 16 7 32 Hear Club Addresses to 1981 30 13 8 51 Xear Club Addresses in 1982 18 23 9 50 SOl'RC.'6: For both tables, information was obtained from the Denton Police Department's conputer list of calls, TABLE 4 Comparison of City-Wide Disturbance, Fight, and Drunk Calls, Second Quarter 1981 and Second Quarter 1982 Disturbance Drunk Fight Total nd Quarter 1981 F51 131 47 829 2nl quarter 1982 683 190 66 944 -7- clubs has to be addressed in terms of public opinion. Some consideration must be given, however, to the origins of these opinions and the accuracy of the information that they may to based on. It is the general view of DASEC that the election held on the ordinance for 12 midnight closings was not an especially accurate measurement of community attitudes on this subject for two reasons: first, the business group that forced that election did not know how to run an effective campaign (failing to receive as many votes for 2 a.m. closings as signitures obtained on the referendum petition), and, second, the electorate was not apprised of the facts and issues attached to the vote. The results of that election, nevertheless, do indicate the depth of certain opinions which roust be considered. In an effort to determine public attitudes on thin isme, questionaires were sent to a representative sample of 241 Denton residents (see appendix for a copy of the 9uestionaire). Table 5 shows the response rate for different categories of residents. A total of 89 questic•►cairs (36.9 percent) were returned, and thel surface opinions on tL appropriate closing time for bars and clubs are listed in Table 6. These results indicate that in a well organized and highly informational vote, 2 a.m. closings would likely be approved by a majority of voters. The swing group in such an election would be those who reported in favor of 12 midnight closings. A hard core of about 10 percent of residents, on the other hand, felt that bars ana clubs should not be allowed to operate at all within Denton. The high saliency of this issue for this group, of course, increases its weight in any Council o- ^lectoral tret•ient of the subject. looking at Table 'I, it will be seen that a slight majority of respondents favored the city becoming either totally "wet" or a little more vet. A larger tiajority (59.55X) of all respondents rejected the notion that clubs pose any additional crime problem for the city. Interestingly, the group that most strongly favo-:ed 2 a.m. closings included those living, in the city for between TABLE 5 Categor pf Residents No. of Surveys Seat No. Returned Response Rate Single Fa.rily Residences (divided between 3 targeted areas in the city) 183 50 27.3t' Single Fanily Residents and Rr:ntal uupler.es near private club 46 21 58.6,• Students IONISI., 1'l. 12 100.0 TOTAL 241 69 36.9'. TABLE G Attitudes Toward Gar Cloc_irn;i_ T_ir es Attitude A11 kests Registered _Resp dents Recent Voters ~li(Inighl t Clo;ir-1 32 (35.It26 (36.10,.) 14 (33.34) `''tcul.E not t,e cyon 117 (11.24 ) 10 (14.040 4 (09.1`") ?an, ClOStn;}s 47 1.1 104,) 35 (49.3p) 24 (51.6'-) Tolt,< <~9 (101) 71 (3000 42 (1011-,) TABLE. 6 ~195e~Bars_~N=0) Hi,dnight_Closings_~N=32 tam Closings_ N=4~ Total_I 14 kegistered 100A 81.25 74.4 1 79.78` Not Registered 0 18.75 25.53 20.2_ Voted 40 43.75 51.06 47.19 Did Not Vote 60 56.25 48.94 52.81 Years in Denton Less Than Three 0 18.15 27.66 21.35 Three to Ten 20 18.75 42.55 31.46 Ten to Twenty 20 15.63 8.51 12.36 More than Twenty 60 46.88 21.28 34.8_ Moost Serious Problem Crime 60 37.50 23.40 32.41 Uncontrolled Growth 0 6.25 4.26 4.4 Quality of Govt, b Services 0 18.75 34.04 24.7-- Economic Opportunities 0 0.00 8.51 4.41 Inadequate Revenues 0 31.25 17.0" 20._ Nono of ~bove 40 5.'L5 1Z.7% 13.7-1 Desired Future of fit. L•,_ a;n can,;, 0 43.75 25.53 29.L-Little 1'A re ? - y 20 18.75 '),00 8. Totally Lry 80 6.25 0.00 ll.L= Little 'tire i;et 0 C.25 X9.71) 17.._ Tot''111 'y'et 0 25.00 32.-- L03ir(d Future Of City +v G1'owtl1 20 51) ',at F.' . " _Jci ;te, Centro+lEJ Grc,otn t0 36.t5 4E'. fast, ("110C,II0,J G7•ci,tn L. 3i.l5 3i. _ 40. E Rapid ,;ruwth l'Jtis Pnse cri+tc Prcb? rr., !i0 37. 0 5i 26. - -10- three and ten years and favoring fast, but controlled, growth. The existrace of adult entertainment till 2. a.m. may be considered an important aspect of the quality of life in Penton for a sizable group of fairly recent residents. She existence of suci: clubs might even be considered a concommitant of growth, at least for some, as the city becomes more cosmopolitan in certain respects of life style. !"his is not to suggest that 2 a.m. closings represent a prerequisit to growth. But thef nay be part and parcel of growth in the minds of some people. Perhpas the most important question that was asked was whether clubs should be forced to close at 12 midnight even if this costs the city revenue and reduces employment. The results suggest that up to 30 percent of those originally favoring 12 midnight closings might support 2 a.m. closings if this were the case. It is the opinion of this report that revenue and employment loses are resulting from early closings, but just how substantial these loses are is for the Council to determine. (The somewhat contradictory responses within the category of those favoring 2 a.m. closings to begin with may be considered e nonsamplit:g error.) In the final analysis, the results of the surrey would indicate that adequate public support exists for 2 a.m. closings, especially if it is found thnt this is beneficial in terms of city re-tonue and employment. Reco:u~ endations DASEC would like the City Council to study the issue of clsoing times with the objective of possibly changing the existing ordinance. Two ideas that DA.SEC supports which might satisfy those with reservations about extended hours are: 1. Clubs and bars be permitted to remain open till 2 a.m. 2n1 on a Thursday, Friday, and Saturday basis. 2. Clubs be required to pay some form of deposit with the city which would be foreited in the event of "too many" police 0&118. -11- TABLE 9 Should Bars Close Early Even if This Causes a Loss in_einployrient_and city revenue?__ Category of Respondents Responses No Bars Midnight Closings ~A.M. Closings All i30. 4. WA. 35.964 Yes No. 0 0.00 85.11% 44.90 21.88 10.64% 15.73'x; Oepund on level ZU of losses 9.38 0.00 3.37;, Don't Know 0 At the very least, DASEC requests that the City Council study the employment and revenue effects or early closings so that the question can be discussed in the future in more factual terms. APPENDIX QUESTIONAIRE #i 1. How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? 3 J' o L 3. How would you assess the business climate in Denton? G ~fo w ^-g 4, Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empolyment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? G %t 5. In comparison to this same period last year (before early closings)-,-- how much, i fat all, have gross receipts declined? 1 ~,Q Bet ~.~.e 6. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 7. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? t~~2la~rtS____ 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce?_~ . y 9. Did you vote in the most recent ;ity elections? L~ r ak~Lsz~~~~y 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate for a local ac~r office, and if so, approximately how much? }f (,/~if 1•_/____ 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? IZ. Has tha early closing ordinance changed your bU51neS5 plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effectiveness of such an organiza- tion? _C.y~'1 14. Do you live within the city of Denton? QUESTIONAIRE M1 1. How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals dc, you employ? 3. How would yo- assess the business climate in Denton? t 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past +lldnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empoltiment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? _Q 5. In comparison to this same period last year (before early closings), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? S \~i y ys LA.~ -.L1 , , 6. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? sl~ 7. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? 4. Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate for a local office, and if so, approximately how much? ) 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? €2. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? k 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what mould be the biggest obstacle to the effectivenes of such an organiza- tion? c~< 14. Do you live within the city of Denton? C' , r QUESTIONAIRE 41 1. How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? 3. Flow would you assess the business climate in Denton? 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empolytaent hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment Per week? 5. In comparison to this same period last year (before early closings,), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? 6. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 7. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the r early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? _ 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? J 9. Did you vote in O e most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate for a local office, and if so, approximately how much? j 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? 12. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for;the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? 13, Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effectiveness of such an organiza- tion? 1 - - 14. Do you live within the city of Denton? QUESTIONAIRE Al 1, How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? Cl 3. How would you assess the business climate in Denton? 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empolyfrent hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? 5. In comparison to this same period last year (befor+ early closings), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? _ -i l 6, Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 1. Have you reduced the size of your work fo n..e as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? 9, Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever mode a campaign contribution to a candidate for a local office, and if so, approximately how much? 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? 12. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effectiveness of such an organiza- tion? 14, Do you live witl!in the city of Denton? QUESTIONAIRE BI 1. How many years have you been in business in Denton? y 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? 3. Hew would you assess the business climate in Denton? 4. Based on the number olt nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empolyment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? Yo _ 5. In comparison to this same period last year (befcre early closings), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? LI-1-4ru 6, Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 7. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? ,i t-,.u,. h..rre! 8, Da you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? ! 9. Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Havc you ever made a campaign contribution to a candjdate for a local office, and if so, approximately how much? 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? ______Li 12. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the, future in Denton, in any way, and if so, how and why? ~ .Cl•-f~ l c , r u rte`. rc 01. j r. ri+ 11 r t 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the' effectiveness of such an organiza- tion? 14. Do you live within the city of Denton? I i i QUE57IONAIRE 01 1. How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? 3. How would you assess the business climate in Denton? 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empolyment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? O 5. In comparison to this same period last year (before early closings), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? 6. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 1. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce?_ 9. Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate f9r a local office, and if so, approximately how much? 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? W~~s 12. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effectiveness of such an organiza- tion? 14. Do you live within the city of Denton? '}'jam QUESTIONAIRE pl 1. How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? 'x?e) 3. How would you assess the business climate in Denton? .,.rj 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many emi)olyment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? AY d 5, in comparison to this same petiod last year (before early closings), c how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? b. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? . s' 7. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? r s,•s 9. Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate for a local office, and if so, approximately how much? A a - 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? `e 12, Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? A'0 -01 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners +n the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effectiveness of such an organiza- tion? P'4 %0,06 / . r✓/iai.c f .srrc 14, Du you live within the city of Denton? to s f QUESTIONAIRE 01 1. How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2, Approximately how many individuals do you -riploy? /,5f 3. How would you assess the business climate in Denton? 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately hour many empolyment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? 5. In comparison to this same period last year (before early- flosings), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? i 6, Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 7. Have you reduced the site of your work force as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if su, by how many? 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? t _ . 9. Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate for a local office, and if so, approximately how much? o c Q 11. Did you participate in the effort to try t reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? 12. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obsta la to the effectiveness of uch an org ni4 2a- 1- r- f ti. .1~ tion? 7~ ,r~- Sal\1 ~ ~l Lam"--- 14, Do you live within the city of Denton? ~i QUESTIONAIRE Al , 1, Huw nany years have you befin in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? fi • `t 3. How would you assess the basiners climate in Denton? ~,-•~li 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on tre clock after midnight, approximately how many empolyment hours have been lost as a result( n of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? 5. In comparison to this same period last year (before early closings), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined?__. 5. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 7. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? 8. Do you belong to tie Denton Chamber of Commerce? 9, Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate for a local office, and if so, approximately how much? ____L 11. Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? a ;2, Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plpns for he future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? 5 13. Do you feel there is a need for an Organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effect v ness-of such an organiza- tion? 1 "jP 1' 1 ,1 14. Co you live within the city of Denton? QUESTIONAIRE #I ynS'. IN~Ru51N>5~,t5 1. How many yaars have you been in business in Denton? ' 11zc&ni -(N,5 (34`~rrvti` 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? z 5f 3. How would you assess the business climate in Denton? DIOQ ?tATCRZ f ~STi?ftJ(~' 4. Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and the average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empolyment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? S. In comparison to this same period last year (before early closings), hoer much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? 6. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 7. Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result o the early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? _ 8. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? y yT7 9. Did you vote in the most recent city elections? 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to1,,c~a,ndidate for a local offica, and if so, approximately how much? ____`7__?C 11, Did you participate in the effort to try to`re~ se the early closing ordinance through a special election? 12. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? wo u ~ll\riiii~(. Ly 13, Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effectiveness of such an organiza- ti0n?~f ~4~'.+~_.iz{~. ~fic 'f'F,'lcf ~ fi.( ; ~ Ct4~1rL!'tlC.~S :~-''!1r~t E~►f~ at `lT~♦•;1~. l ids 14. Do you live within the city of Denton? QUES TIONAIRE NI 1, How many years have you been in business in Denton? 2. Approximately how many individuals do you employ? 1{~ 3. Now would you assess the Nsiness climate in Denton? 11c!c-L'r~ ;7t S t 4, Based on the number of nights you formerly remained open past midnight and Ue average number of employees kept on the clock after midnight, approximately how many empolyment hours have been lost as a result of the early closing ordinance at your establishment per week? _11-1- S. It, comparison to this same period last year (before early closings), how much, if at all, have gross receipts declined? 3 C 6. Do you feel that midnight closings are costing you business? 7, Have you reduced the size of your work force as a result of the ~ early closing ordinance, and if so, by how many? 4C j ` B. Do you belong to the Denton Chamber of Commerce? 9. Did you vote in the most recent city elections? eL 10. Have you ever made a campaign contribution to a candidate for'aILI,ocal office, and if so, approximately how much? 11, Did you participate in the effort to try to reverse the early closing ordinance through a special election? 12. Has the early closing ordinance changed your business plans for the future in Denton in any way, and if so, how and why? e t.~,'C 13. Do you feel there is a need for an organization to represent and protect the interests of bar and club owners in the city of Denton, and what would be the biggest obstacle to the effectiveness of such an organiza- tion? 14. Do you live within the city of Denton? 1/ y, September 5, 1982 4e the undersigned, permanent residents of Denton, 'texas, area corner remove of h Oak "Safe and Fry Haven, Streets* Crisis petition Center" "i from t the to The Crisis Center is unsuitably located in a residential area, and it has generated much anxiety throughout the neigh- borhood, We are deeply concerned about the security of our property and the common safety of our very lives, r. d .L~ C f ~rl - Y~ 4~ r 357- S, W"E ? C 12-7 6 w - OaK 332 - 5$'7 f c 0/eo-F~~yy 3t7'-`7rtr C, u It ..t ee. e-e x:Ctti I`t, i i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SKEET Date: October 5, 1982 Subject: Consider leasing City property at the northeast corner of Dallas Drive and Willow Springs Drive to Coors-Golden Distributing Company for use as a recycling center. Summary: In March, 1982, the City Council con- sidered a request of Coors-Golden Dis- tributing Company to lease City property at the above captioned location for use as a recycling center. The City Council tabled the request and directed staff to prepare a detailed agreement and site plan which would provide better information on which to base a decision. The subject property was acquired by the City of Denton for right-of-way purposes, and a portion was used to facilitate the Duncan Street realignment project. Duncan Street was realigned so that it would no longer intersect with Dallas Drive, and Coors proposes to use the remaining prop- erty and the original street section as part of their operation. The recycling operation involves the erection of a con- crete foundation which accommodates two semi-trailers, a can compacter and a can sorter. The purpose of the recycling center is to recover aluminum cans that would otherwise be buried in landfills and recycle them for continued use, thus, pre- serving natural resources and saving energy. Recyciing operations also aid in reducing litter and is a common fund raising project for civic organizations, service clubs and members of the community who rely on these funds for necessary or extra income. City Council Agenda October 5, 1982 Page 2 The staff Development Review Committee does not anticipate any immediate public use for the property, but it does not recommend disposing of the property perma- nently. If the property is disposed of permanently and acquired by a private un- restricted user, additional curb cuts may be requested at this site; if granted, they could defeat the purpose of expending public funds to realign old Duncan Street so as to improve traffic flow and access in this area. Staff was approached by an individual indicating interest in buying this property after the City Council con- sidered this request in March. The pro- posed agreement with Golden Distributing Company insures the presence of a user that will maintain the property in its present form with respect to curb cuts. Conditions in the agreement restrict any additional curb cuts and obligate Coors to maintain the property during the life of the agreement. The Parks and Recreation Department estimates that the City would realize savings of approximately $260 annually in mowing and general maintenance costs if Coors assumed this responsibility. Other agreement features include: an agreement by Coors to erect a minimum four (4) foot solid wooden fence or shrubs along the boundary of the eastern property line adjacent to Dallas Drive and Willow Springs Drive for screening purposes; pruning and trimming of all existing trees and shrubs for use as additional natural screening; no more than two (2) trailers at the site at all times; a single de- tached sign limited to a size of 4'x6'; ingress - egress from existing curb open- ing along Duncan Street only; complete and City Council Agenda October 5, 1982 Page 3 adequate maintenance of the property dur- ing the life of the lease; responsibility for any damage or injuries on or about the premises; and no subleasing or assignment of the lease without prior written consent of the lessor. The Golden Distributing Company is requesting a six (6) year lease with payments to the City of $200 annually for the first two year period; $300 per year for the third and fourth years; and, $400 per year for the fifth and sixth years. An agreement clause would also provide the City with the opportunity to have the property vacated for any reason, provided the lessor is notified at least ninety (90) days in advance. All improve- ments made to the property shall remain i City contrgl after expiration of the agreement and said improvements must be made within ninety (90) days of the effective date of the agreement. Action Required: Approval or disapproval of the attached agreement leasing City property at the northeast corner of Dallas Drive and Willow Springs Drive to Coors-Golden Dis- tributing Company for use as a recycling center. Alternatives: 1. Approve the agreement with attached conditions 2. Approve the agreement with additional or modified conditions 3. Deny the request 4. Table for future consideration Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mended approval at its meeting of March 3, 1982 by a vote of 6 - 1. Source of Income: Lessor City Council Agenda October 5, 1982 Page 4 Attachments: 1. Site Plan 2. Planning and Zoning minutes of March 3, 1982 3. Correspondence from Coors-Golden Dis- tributing Company 4. Proposed agreement David Ellison Development Review Planner oof rrsr,y` _ 4tA tar pvAtA~ sr. PAOPOSEp AECMtt[!i0 SttR ~ i s s ot. aw. ~ DALLAS DR. r.r he ■ I j 6 10 t I ' t 234 I I ~ ,r'. i 279 t , u A 10 I ILI Ja u F z t e PR ?OSED~REMUNO S 1 r r la Se 6 Q ' 164 I t 279 o 3qo~ f ie.l e 279 I lea A : 11 IS'S • a 293 W J N e ~ I F- 14 a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS rr,r r,r~r r•.~oe• Minutes Plannin;, ind Zoning Commission ~Sarch 3, 1982 Page 4 F. Consider leasing city property located it the corner of Sell Avenue and Robertson Street to Coors-Golden 1istributing Company to accommodate a recycling center. David Ellison presented this request, which was tabled at the February 17, 1982 meeting to give staff an oppor- tunity t o discuss Iandscaping and screening with appli - cont and to explore aItertiatc locations for this use. fie? Sta.''e,'l thtst ';t;!ff ha ;r list Of S.:acral city properties that could he considered for leasing to Coors-Golden Distributing, brit felt that one city lot with frontage on Datias Drive, Wiliow Springs and Ouncin Street would accommodate the recycling center best. This is a larger lot than the Bell Avenue - kohertson lot and is situated in a commercial zoned irrea. Also, no curb cut would be needed onto Dallas Drive. %Ir. F I I icon also stated that Coors - Golden Distributing Company has agreed to install ian,lscaping and screeening devices at any location approved by Planning drill Zoning Commission. Ms. McAdams moved to remove item from table and recommend leasing city property at Dallas I►rivc, Willow Springs arru Duilc.rn Street to Coors-Gulden Distributing Company for a recycling center, subject to conditions to be determine-a by staff. Ms. Gilchrist seconded and writion carried h} a vote of G-I. (Mr. Sidor voted "\o".) 11. Consider Scheciul i n; ri stfrdy session for 7:00 p.m., March 10, 1982. NIr. ltiatkir.s suggcAcd that a study session he scheduled for March 10, 1982. The time of the study session was discussed as to whether S:00 p.m. or 7:00 p.m. would accommodate the commission 1)etter. Conccnsus of the Commission was to schedule study sess'io'n fur 'larch l0, 15182 at 7:00 p.m. I:. Discussion of proposed revision to pre Iimiirnry plat of HiIIha ven Ad(I ition. Ciiarics !tatkkis presented the pruposed revisions to the preliminary plat of the Ilillhaven Addition, stating that developer Jesse Coffey's proposal is to delete c.i,tini,a tir,n of three streets, Ycl'owstone, Sheraton and Ilontinaton, iii+.o his 14W)IiViSiOll. He desires to bring 1luckingham into suhdivision. )1r. ltintioins ~;;iirl lie had tiiI Nvd with '•1r. Glnnings, developer of Bnyril acres just south of the lrruposed a Idition, concerning his opinion C!" GOLDEN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 400 North Stemmona. P.O. Sox 968 Lake Dallas, Texas 75065 Phone: (817) 4912281 Metro: (214) 247.5014 Denton: (8171566.2442 MARCH 101 1982 MR, DAVID ELLISON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON.. TEXAS 76201 DEAR MR, ELLISON: THIS IS TO ADVISE YOU THAT ALTHOUGH OUR PROPOSAL FOR A RECYCLING CENTER IN DENTON WAS TABLED, WE SINCERELY APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION, AS YOU KNOW, WE ARE NOW REQUESTING PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH THE PROPOSED CENTER ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST CORNER OF DALLAS DRIVE AND TEASLEY LANE, WE WANT TO ASSURE YOU THAT WE TAKE PRIDE IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND IF OUR PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED, WE WILL WORK WITH THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN ANY WAY, OUR SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT ARE AS FOLLOWS, 1) ERECT A WOOD FENCE, NOT TO OBSTRUCT TRAFFIC, 2) PLANT A ROW OF SHRUBS AROUND PROPERTY, IN SUCH A MANNER NOT TO OBSTRUCT TRAFFIC, IN ADDITION, WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO WORK CLOSELY WITH THE BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE TO INSURE THE CENTER TO BE AN ASSET TO DENTON, SINCERELY, Tom MCWHORTER GO!.DEN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 400 North Stemmons• P.O. Box 966 Lake Dallas. Texas 75065 Phone: (817) 497.2261 Metro: (214)247.5014 Denton: (811) 566-2442 PERHAPS THE BEST KNOWN COORS ENVIORNMENTAL PROGRAM IS ITS "CASH FOR CANS" RECYCLED EFFORT, IN JANUARY OF 19591 COORS BECAME THE FIRST BREWERY IN THE NATION TO MARKET BEER IN ALUMINUM CANS, COORS STARTED ITS RECYCLE PROGRAM IN 1970 AND HAS ACCOUNTED "R THE REDEMPTION OF OVER 617 MILLION POUNDS OF ALUMINUM CANS. . .D TOTAL PAYOFF TO CONSUMERS OF OVER 119 MILLION DOLLARS. APPROXIMATELY 70 PERCENT OF ALUMINUM COORS PUTS INTO ITS MARKET IS RETURNED FOR RECYCLING, WE AT GOLDEN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY ARE INTERESTED IN A RECYCLE CENTER Itl THE CITY OF DENTON, THE RECYCLING OF ALUMINUM BEVERAGE CANS IS ONE WAY MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY CAN HELP SAVE ENERGY AND REDUCE LITTER, IT IS ALSO AN EXCELLENT FUND RAISER FOR CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS, SERVICE CLUBS] PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATIONS AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON, ASIDE FROM THE MOST OBVIOUS REASONS, RECYCLING ALUMINUM IS CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES AS AGAIN THE SHORTAGE OF THIS PRECIOUS METAL BEGINS TO INTENSIFY, THE TRACK RECORD IN THE PAST OF OUR RECYCLE CENTERS HAS BEEN EXCELLENT. THIS IS OUR WAY OF SAYING THANK YOU TO YOU' LOYAL C0I4MUNITY THAT HAS AIDED TREMENDOUSLY IN THE GROWTH OF OUR COMPANY AND HELPING TO KEEP OUR BEAUTIFUL COUNTRY CLEAN ' 216L THE STATE OF TEXAS S RNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF DENTON S This Agreement, dated this the day of _ 1982, by and between the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called Lessor and Coors-Golden Distributing Company, hereinafter refered to as Lessee, made to become effective when fully executed by both parties. In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. LEASED PREMISES, TER+1 Lessor hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor, that certain property, described as follows: All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the S. C. Hiram Survey, Abstract No. 516, and also t,.ing part of a tract of land as conveyed from Charleit H. Townson Schmitt to the City of Denton by deed dated April 11 1980 and recorded in Volume 1010, Page 339 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and more particularly described as followsr BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said tract, said point lying at the intersection of the northeast right of way line of Dallas Drive with the east right of way line of Duncan Street; THENCE north 1012118" east along the west boundary line of said tract, same being the east right of way line of Duncan street, a distance of 107.29 feet to a point for a corners THENCE south 87040147" east along the north boundary line of ;ai3 trait 3 diskin,:e of fart ro a coin: for a corner; THENCE south 47021147" east a distance of 43.5 feet to a point for a Corner in the east boundary line of said tract, same being the west right of way line of willow Springs Drives THENCE south 42038113" west along the east boundary line of said tract, same being the west right of way line of Willow Springs Drive a distanci of 103.0 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the southerly southeast corner of said tract, said point also being the interseCtion of the northea?t right rf -Ay line of Dallas nrive with thi northwest right of way line of 1411low Springs; THENCE north 89025152" west alonz the south boundary line of said tract a distance of 17.24 feet to the place of teginninq, and containing 0.1374 acres of land, more or less; I to be used as an aluminum recycling center ani ua?s nor*ili: COGS-GOLDEN DISTRIBUTING COMPANY CONTPACT-PAlF ONE incident thereto and for no other purpose, for the term of six (6) years. II. RENTAL PAYMENTS . Lessee agrees to and shall pay Lessor at 21S East McKinney, Denton, Texas, or such other place ae Lessor shall designate In. writing as rent for the demised premises as foliowsi Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per year for tRe first two (2) years of the terms Three Hundred Do',lars ($300.00) per year for the third and fourth years of the terms and tour Hundred Dollars ($409.00) per year for the fifth and sixth years of the term, said rental payments totaling (61 Eyear ighteen term. Dollars ($1,800.00) for the whole six Rental payments for each year of the six (6) year term are due and payable within thirty (30) days of the beginning of each yearly term. 111. IMPROVEMENTS Lessee stall within ninety (90) days of the beginning of the lease improve the demised premises with a solid wooden fence, or shrub screening at least focr (41) feet in height extending fro n the southern edge of the property along the eastern boundary of the eastern property line adjacent to the Dallas Drive and willow Springs Drive right-of-way. All existing trees and shrubs shall be pruned and tr•:mmec+ 90 as to 54rve as an alditional natural screen. All improvements including fences and shrubs shall be maintaine,l in good condition and repair throvahoit the term of the lease. IV. TRAILERS Lessee shall cot place more then t.m 121 coil?ction trailers upon the lensed prc!mise.; at any one time during the lease ti%rz. V. SIC, NS A single detached sign properly located •,rith a maxinu~ size CCOAS-GO:DEN OISTRIBUTING, COMPANY CONTPAC^-PAOZ 'NO i of four foot by eight foot (4'X8') shall be permitted on the property. VI. ACCESS Ingress and egress to the leased premises shall be provide' by the existing curb opp,iing along Duncan Street and no other means of ingress or egress shall be made or used without tits j written approval of Lessor. i Vii. I UTILITIES 1 Lessee shall during the term hereof osy all charges fc. telephone, gas, electricity, water or sewer used in or on t=,t I leased premises and for the removal of rubbish therefrom befcce t'r,ey shall beome delinquent and shall hold Lessor harmless fc:a any liability therefor. VIII. NUISANCv Lessee shall not permit the maintenance or commission of a-r n+iisance on the leased premises or use the leased premises I--. any unlawful purpose. Lessee agrees to keep the leased premi'es free of all trashy rubbish or other debris except for thcse materials necEssary to its rec,vcling operation. IX. INDEhNIFICATION Lessee shall indemnify Lessor against all expenavs. liabilities and claims of every kind, including reasonz~:s attorney's fees, by of on behalf of any person or entity out of either (1) any injury or damaae happening on or about ='f demised premises during the term of this lple4t or (2) 2-1, mechanic's lien or security inrerest filed zgainst the d=..-, prenisea as a result of Lesseea activities nn the de-,:ee f i property. COORS-GOLDEN DISTRIBUTING CO'4PAW CONTPACT-PAGE TNRSE X. ASSIGNMENTS Lessee shall not have the right to sublease the demised premises cr to assign this lease without the prior written consent of Lessor. XI. TERMINATION Lessor may terminate this agreement at any time during the term, with or without cause, by giving Lessee written notice of such termination at least ninety 190) days prior to the termination date. MI. REMOVAL UPON TERMINATION Upon expiration or termination of this lease, Lessee shall vacate the demised premises and remove therefrom all rubbish, trash, or other debris, or equipment used for recycling including, but not limited to, collecting trailers, sorting and crushing equipment or machines. All other improvements, affixed tc or installed on the property, including but not limited to, fencing, shrubbery, screens or other landscaping features s*sll remain on the demisea premises and become the property of Lesser. EXECUTED this the day of _ 1982. r2C'i OT 07tiTO::, TEXAS. Dt5"RI9'ITV*,I LESSOR COMPANY, LESSEE. By. BY- COORS GOLDEN DISTRIPUTING COMPANY f_~oNT rZ-j A'I' FOUR 1 R E S O L U T I O N BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN'rON, TEXAS: The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City of Denton, Texas, a Lease Agreement between the City of Denton and Coors-Golden Distributing Company property located on the northeast corner of Dallas Drive and Willow Springs to accommodate a recycling center. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 5th day of October, 1982. RICHARD 0. STEKART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS (fJ October 5, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Consider Contract with Black and Veatch, Consulting Engineers, for Miscellaneous Engineering Services for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Licensing Activities on Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville Hydroelectric Units. SUMMARY: Black and Veatch has completed their preparation of licensing documents for Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake hydroelectric projects, and they, therefore, have fulfilled their pre,ious engineering contract with the City of Denton. The Staff is now reviewingy the subject documents and plans to submit to FERC by October 1, 1982. It is anticipated that some coordination activities will be necessary with FERC during their review of the license application documents. It is recommended that Black and Veatch be retained Curing the FERC license application review, so that they will be available to answer any technical questions that FERC may have with regard to the licensing documents. A proposed engineering services retainer contract is attached herewith. This contract will be established not to exceed $5,000 without further approval. In the event that it will be necessary for Black and Veatch engineering personnel to travel to Washington, DC, to the FERC offices, it is planned that the Utility Administration would pay for such out-of-pocket travel expense directly from the budgeted "services" account. FISCAL SUMMARY: The fees charged will be on a per-hour basis, based on standard Black and Veatch engineering rates and multipliers with a "not-to-exceed amount" of $5,000. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or disapproval by the City Council to enter into a retainer agreement with Black and Veatch for engineering services. 1278U/3 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve proposed engineering retainer contract. 2. Issue individual purchase orders to Black and Veatch on an "as needed" basis. 3. Do not utilize Black and Veatch for engineering services during FERC licensing review, but instead, attempt to utilize City Staff for this function. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 22, 1952, recommended to the City Council that the City of Denton enter into an engineering retainer contract with Black and Veatch to provide engineering services during the FERC's review Lake and construction iRoberts license of of the y a hydr electricunitsfor iLew iisville for Respectfully, R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Proposed Engineering Retainer Contract with Black and Veatch 1276U/4 GENERAL AGREEMENT FOR • ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS CONTRACT, effective the day of in the year Nineteen Hundred and Eighty-two, by and between the CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS, a municipal cor- poration organized and existing under the Home Rule Amendment to the Constitution of Texas (hereinafter referred to as the Dwner), and BLACK & VEATCH CONSULTING ENGI- NEERS (hereinafter referred to as the Engineer), a partnership having principals registered as professional engineers in the State of Texas, with principal business office at Kansas City. Missouri. WITNESSETH; WHEREAS, the O.+ner requires services of the Engineer from time to time to assist the Owner with requests and requirements of local, state, and federal regulatory agencies to obtain various licenses and permits required for the construction and operation of hydropower developments at Lewisville Lake Dam and Ray Roberts Reservoir Dam, and other services as may be required by the Owner on an as-needed-and-authorized basis, referred to hereinafter as the Services; and, WHEREAS, the Engineer is prepared to provide such Services. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein con- tained, the parties hereto agree as follows. ARTICLE I - SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE ENGINEER The Engineer shall perform the Services when needed, as determined required, and authorized by the Owner. ARTICLE H - COMPENSATION The Owner shall pay to the Engineer for the performance of the Services the sum of the follow- ing amounts. (1) The amount of 2.0 times payroll costs of personnel applied to the Services. Payroll cost is defined as 1.25 times direct salary cost. (2) For all expenses incurred by the Engineer directly chargeable to the Services ren- dered pursuant to this Contract, an amount equal to the actual out-of-pocket cost or standard charges for such expenses. Such expenses shall specifically include. but are not necessarily limited to, the following; (a1 Long distance telephone expenses. (b) Standard charges for operating time actually applied to the Services of the Engineer's computer center, other computer centers, and the Engineer's automated drafting systems. (c) Prints, reproductions, and printed documents at standard rates. (d) Reasonable traveling and living expenses for personnel. (e) The actual cost paid by the Engineer to third parties. (f) Other direct expenses related to the Services. The Engineer's fiscal month is from the :7th day of each month through the 26th day of the succeeding month. The Engineer will submit to the Owner monthly invoices for Services per- formed. Each invoice will be submitted by about the fifteenth day of the month following the month during which such Services were performed. The Owner agrees to pay the Engineer's monthly invoice within 30 days after the invoice is received by the Owner. The Owner has the right to audit the time records and salaries of personnel and charges for direct expenses. ARTICLE III - GENERAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE ENGINEER The Engineer shall exercise. the care, skill, and diligence customarily provided by a professional engineer in the performance of such Services for projects similar to the project contemplated hereunder. If any modifications or alterations are required to correct significant deviations from the quality of Services stipulated, the Engineer will, at no cost to the Owner, re-perform the necessary Services to correct such deviations. The Engineer agrees to defend and indemnify the Owner against clai.-ns, loss, or damage which are the result of any accident caused by negligence associated with Services performed by the Engineer. The Engineer's liability shall be limited to the extent of the Engineer's available insurance coverage for such negligence. The Engineer shall have no liability to the Owner for loss of use damages incurred by the Company (including but not limited to loss of profits, cost of capital. cost of replacement • power or similar damages) arising out of the Services performed, or neglected to be performed. by the Engineer under this Contract. The liability of the Engineer under the provisions of this Article shall not apply more than ta-o years after completion of the Services performed under this Contract. ARTICLE IV - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The Engineer undertakes the performance of this Contract as an independent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the methods followed in the performance of the Services and, although the Owner shall have no right to supervise directly the methods used in the per- formance of the Services hereunder. its representative shall have the right to inspect such Services during the performance thereof and shall approve same for the Owner. The Engineer shall work closely with the Owner in performing Services under this Contract. ARTICLE V - COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Engineer will, insofar as practical in the performance of Services, endeavor to comply with all applicable regulatory requirements including federal, state, and local laws. rules and regula- ti:)ns, codes, criteria, and standards. ARTICLE VI - QUALITY ASSURANCE • The Engineer shall perform the Services in accordance with the Engineer's Qu;,,ity Assurance Program. The Engineer's Quality Assurance Program shall be available for review by the Owner. ARTICLE VII - INSURANCE During the performance of the Services under this Contract, the Engineer, for the protection of the Owner, shall maintain the following insurance. (1) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than 5500,000 for each occurrence and not less than S500,000 in the aggregate, and with property damage limits of not less than S 100,000 for each occurrence and not less than S 100,000 in the aggregate. (2) Automobile Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than ~ 300.000 for each person and not less than $500,000 for each accident, and with property damage limits of not less than S 100,000 for each occurrence. (3) Worker's Compensation Insurance in accordance with statutory requirements and Employers' Liability Insurance with limits of not less than 5100,000 for each accident. Tha Engineer shall furnish the Owner certificates of insurance of the Enginecr's insurance policies covering the stated liabilities, together with the provision that the same shall not be canceled without at least ten days' written notice to the Owner. ARTICLE VIII - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES • The Owner shall supply to the Engineer, eitner directly or indirectly from others, all available information and data which is required by the Engineer. The Owner will be responsible for the following: (1) Approve all procedures established to govern the relationships among the Owner. the Engineer, and third parties. (2) Make final engineering and planning decisions utilizing informatics supplied by the Engineer. (3) Provide designated personnel to represent the Owner in matters involving the Engineer. ARTICLE IX - OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Reports, summaries, plans, and other documents arising out of this Contract shall be made available and supplied to the Owner for their use. Original notes, calculations cad investigative information, and copies of other documents shall remain in the files of the Engineer. ARTICLE X - TER,NINATION OF CONTRACT The Owner shall have the right to terminate this Contract upon written notice to the Engineer. snd the Engineer shall terminate performance of Services on a schedule acceptable to the Owner. In the event of termination, the Owner shall pay the Engineer for all Services per- formed. ARTICLE XI - ASSIGNMEN'r This Contract shall not be assigned in whole or in part except as may be approved in writing by • the Owner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Contract by their duly authorized representatives effective the day and year first above written. ATTEST CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY BY...................................... Datc TITLE TITLE................................... ATTEST: I BLACK & VEATCH CONSULTING ENGINEERS BY BY...................................... Date TITLE TITLE................................... I r~ October 5, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Consider Contract with Freese and Nichols, for Engineering Evaluation of Location and Schedule for Water Treatment Pant Expansion. SUMMARY: Our recent Long Range Water Supply Study indicates that an expansion to the Water Treatment Plant will be required in the mid to late 1980's time frame. Attached is a proposed contract with Freese and Nichols for engineering services to evaluate the schedule and the various alternative locations for such a Water Treatment Plant expansion. Within the Scope of Services listed in the contract, we are requesting that Freesi and Nichols look at the specific schedule for when a new expansion is required and to examine the various alternatives of plant location. With the construction of Ray Roberts Reservoir now undirway, it would be appropriate to analyze the relative m,%rits of locating the expansion of the Water Treatment Plant at the existing site or perhaps ioca,.e it at the northern boundaries of the City and take raw water from Ray Roberts Lake, or perhaps locate the Water Treatment Plant near the Ray Roberts Reservoir Lake site, so as to provide treated water for the area between the Lake and the City of Denton. It is anticipated that this study can be initiated durin the first part of October 1982, with a one-hundred t4anity (1201 day completion date specified, so that it would be available by the first part of 19838 This would allow the City to make necessary plans for capital improvement planning and to interface with the Corps of Engineers in the event that the raw water pump station should be installed at Ray Roberts Reservoir. It will be necessary for Freese and Nichols to coordinate their findings with the City of Denton's Water Distribution Consulting Engineers, Hogan and Rasor, so that an analysis of the impact of a new treatment system on the distribution system can be conducted. It will be necessary for the City to enter iirto a small contract with Hogan and Rasor to perform such distribution system analysis as required. It is not anticipated that such costs would exceed $5,000. 1278U/I FISCAL SUMMARY: Estimated Cost The contract price will be based on Freese & Nichols, Inc., standard per diem professional service fees times their standard multiplier with a "not-to-exceed" amount of $30,000. Source of Funds: Budgeted Funds- 1982/83 Budget Account #04-50-85-02 ACTION REQUIRED: Recommendation by the City Council as to appropriate action regarding contract with Freese and Nichols for engineering services. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve contract. 2. Consider other engineering firm. 3. Do not conduct study at this time. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 22, 1982, recommended entering into a contract with Freese and Nichols for engineeriog evaluation of location and schedule for Water Treatment Plant expansion. Respectfully, R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Proposed Contract with Freese & Nichols, Inc. BU/2 CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNT% OF DENTON ) THIS CONTRACT entered into this Day of October, 1982, by and between the City of Denton, Texas Hereinafter called the Owner, acting by and through Richard O. Stewart, its Mayor, duly authorized to act, and Freese and Nichols, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas, hereinafter called the Engineer. WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 1. Em to ment of Engineer: The Owner hereby employs the Engineer an he Engineer agrees to perform all necessary professional services as herein set forth in connection with the engineering evaluation of the schedule for and location of an expansion of the City's Water Treatment Plant. II. Character and Extent of Services: The Engineer shall per orm pro ess ona sere ces comprising engineering feasibility investigations and studies for determining the schedule for an expansion to the City of Denton's Water Treatment Plant and the evaluatic.s of various alternatives for the location of such an expansion with attention given to the new Ray Roberts Reservoir now under construction. III. Sco a of Services: The scope of work shall include the following: A. Schedule for Water Plant Expansion: 1. Utilizing the recently completed Long Range Water Supply Study, determine the schedule for the expansion of the City's Water Treatment Plant plus provide recommendations on the size expansion required. Recommendations for short term capacity improvements should be considered in determining the schedule. Evaluation of variu s sizes of the expansion shall be included and should address advantages and disadvantages of sizes larger or smaller than the recommended optimum size. 1. B. Location of Expansion at Present Site: 1. Review the hydraulics, capital costs, and projected operation and maintenance costs of an expansion to the existing water treatment facilities, including a new Raw Water Pump Station adjacent to the existing station, a new Water Treatment Plant on City owned property immediately east of the present plant, and another (third) parallel raw water line. C. Alternatives of Expansion with Ray Roberts as Water 1. Review the probable operating level in the proposed Ray Roberts Reservoir, and evaluate the hydraulics of a direct water supply from that reservoir as follows: a) Raw water pump station on Ray Roberts Reservoir pumping to Water Treatment Plant at the present site. b) Raw water pump station on Ray Roberts Reservoir pumping to new Water Treatment Plant near the reservoir site. • c) New Water Treatment Plant below Ray Roberts Reservoir dam, possibly fed by gravity flow from reservoir without raw water pumping, if topography will permit. d) New Water Treatment Plant below Ray Roberts Reservoir dam, fed by gravity flow when water level will permit, and by raw water pumps when the level is too low for gravity feed. e) New Water Treatment Plant located near the northern boundary of the City, fed by raw water pump station on Ray Roberts. D. Coordination with Distribution Studies; 11 For viable alternatives, develop projected capital and O&M costs to the year 20009 for the total water supply and treatment system. This will involve evaluation of new points of water supply input to the distribution system by the City with the computer model developed for the City by Hogan b Rasor, Inc. Capital costs will be developed for the new supply lines as well as for internal system improvements needed as a result of the changed point of input. 2. 1239U/2 • E. Report; 1. Prepare maps and tabulations showing the location and tentative configuration of all alternatives considered, together with the related hydraulic and cost data for constructing, operating, and maintaining each alternative. 2. Prepare draft report summarizing the basic data obtained in the study and presenting recommendations and estimates of probable cost. 3. Following approval of the draft report, twenty-five (25) bound copies of the final report shall be presented to the City (Owner). IV. Future Evaluation of Specific Sites at Ray Roberts Lake A. if it is determined that a new Water Treatment Plant at Ray Roberts Reservoir is cost effective, a second phase to the study will probably be desirable. This phase sites for would the eWater study to the The alternati-ee of this study would probably include; • 11 Locate possible sites with suitable topography for a Water Treatment Plant on USGS topographic maps. 2. Conduct field inspection of the possible sites and reduce the number to only those which appear best. 3. Select for each of the sites a tentative routing for raw water line, high service line connection to distribution system, line for disposal of sludges, access road, natural gas lino, and electrical service. Reduce the selections to the two best sites. 4. Prepare tentative plant layout for each site. with consideration given to future expansions. Prepare estimate of probable cost for development of facilities on each site. 51 Have soils laboratory drill at least two (2) test holes on each site to determine soil classification and to evaluate foundation requirements. 3. 1239U/3 6. Prepare a draft report summarizing the basic data obtained in the study and presenting recommendations and estimate of probable cost. B. This study of schedule and location evaluation shall be conducted such that information can be available for the subject second phase study. However, no work shall be conducted on such specific second phase site location study prior to authorization. V. Time of Com letion; The review draft of the report shall be delivered to the Owner within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days following authorization to proceed with the study. The twenty-five (25) printed and bound copies of the final report shall be delivered to the Owner within fifteen (15) calendar days following review and approval of the draft. YI. Fee: A. The Owner agrees to pay the Engineer for all services rendered under this contract in accordance with the following with the total maximum fee not exceed $30,000 without prior approval of Denton:4 11 Officer-Per Diem S.W. Freese, J.R. Nichols, R.L. Nichols L.B. Freese, R.S. Gooch, J.P. Jones, R.A. Thompson, III $640.00 T.A. Reid, J.H. Cook 2. Associats:s-Per Diem O.C. Allen, J.B. Mapes, A.H. Ullrich W.E. Clement, E.C. Copeland, $540.00 G.N. Reeves 3. Staff Members - Salary Cost Times Multiplier o 2..3 Salary Cost is defined as the cost of salaries of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers, survey-ten, clerks, laborers, etc., for time directly chargeable to the project, plus social security contributi,%ns, unemployment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, ick leave able bonuses, vacation and holiday pay thereto. (Salary Cost is equal to 1.34 times salary payments. This factor is adjusted annually.) 4. 4. Other Direct_ Expense - All other direct expenses shall be charged at actual cost. Other direct expenses shall include printing and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and subsistence away from Fort Worth and other miscellaneous expense directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory analysis, test, and other work required to be done by independent persons or agents other than staff members. 5. Payment -Payment will be made on statements su m tted by the Engineer. Statements shall not be submitted at intervals of less than one (1) month. VII. Successors and Assignments: The Owner and the Engineer, eac n s mse -,his successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the other party to this Agreement, and to the successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of such other party in respect of all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Engineer shall assign, sublet or transfer his interests in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. This Contract is executed in three counterparts. IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, they have executed this Agreement, the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON TEXAS OWNER CITY OF DENTON9 TEXAS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS (CITY SEAL) FREESE & NICHOLS INC. Engineer WITNESS; By: ames R. c o s, President J. 1239U/5 C/ October 5, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Coisider Environmental Protection Agency Grant Amendment for Phase III of the Industrial Pretreatment Program. SUMMARY: on 6une 26, 1978, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated Pretreatment Regulations governing the control of industrial waste discharged to municipal sewage treatment systems. These regulations were developed in order to fulfill three objectives: 1. To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the system which interfere with treatment processes, 2. To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the system which will pass through the treatment works; and, 3. To improve opportunities to reclaim and recycle municipal and industrial wastewaters and sludges. in order to accomplish the above objectives, the City of Denton developed a pretreatment program which regulates the discharge of industrial wastes into the sewage treatment system. The Industrial Pretreatment Program consisted of three phases of development (see Exhibit I): Phase I: Education & Training, Industrial Waste Survey, Data Analysis, Public Hearing Phase II : Pretreatment Enforcement Evaluation Authority, Limitations Design Developmnt, of Phase III: Evaluation of Financial and Revenue Sources, Laboratory Equipment Required to Implement Monitoring Program, Effluent Limitations for Prohibited Pollutants, and Application for Municipal Pretreatment P+-ogram "Apprival". The grant amendment funding request for development of Phase I and 11 g 1982 and activities I a& 11 accepted successfully Council completedi have been the City lU It is now necessary to begin with Phase III of the Pretreatment Program. Therefore, it is necessary for Denton to request a grant amendment to the City's EPA Construction Grant for the Pecan Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant for funding Phase III of the Industrial Pretreatment Program. 1278U/9 f' The estimated cost of Phase III activities is $48,678 (See Exhibit 1II). Funds are available from the EPA to fund 75% of this work. A copy of Phase is II and III of the Industrial Pretreatment Program Plan of Study is attached (See Exhibit I). FISCAL SUMMARY: Transportation Equip.---No funding requested $ 0.00 Sampling Equipment $ 79657.00 Analytical/Laboratory Equipment $35,741.00 Administrative Facility 5 5,280.00 TOTAL FOR PHASE III $48,678.00 Federal Share $36,508.50 City's Share $12,169.50 Source of Funds: Wastewater Treatment Plant Bond Funds ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by the City Council to submit the Application for a grant amendment Phase III to the Texas Department of Water Resources. ALTERNATIVES: None RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September 22, 1982, recommended to the City Council the approval of the herein-referenced request for funding (grant amendment) for submittal to the Texas Department of Water Resources. Respectfully, R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I City of Denton Pretreatment Program Plan of Study II Cost Summary/ IPP/80 Phase I and Phase II III Funding Request Summary IV Detailed List of Proposed Equipment & Facilities-Phase III 1276UIIO Page 1 City of Denton EXHIBIT I CITY OF DENTON PRETREATMENT PROGRAM PLAN OF STUDY (Revised) PHASE I I.' EDUCATION AND TRAINING This part of the outline is to identify regulation requirements and to organize the development of the program. A, Literature. 1. Federal Guideline Documents (EPA-430/9-76-017a). 2. Magazines. 3. Categorical Standard Development Documents. 4, News Letters. 5. Subscription to the Federal Register. B, Training. 1, Visit other cities to learn methods and procedures. 2. Attending seminars and workshops on program development. 3. Participate on American Metropolitan Sewage Agencies 'rational Pretreatment Committee. (i. INDUSTRIAL WASTE SURVEY The following activities will give the City the background information needed to evaluate monitoring needs and will also establish an inventory of the City's industrial sector. A. Identification Of Affected Users. 1. Denton Water Utilities Billing. 2. Yellow Pages and Criss Cross Directories. 3. Chamber of Commerce. 4. Texas Manufacturing Guide, 1007U/1 Page 2 City of Denton B. Preliminary Data Analysis. 1. Develop Master List of Industries. 2. Classify Industries by SIC Code. 3. Delineate Between Wet and Dry Industries. 4. Tentatively Identify Significant Dischargers. 5. Establish Industry Inventory for Questionnaire Survey. C. Questionnaire Survey Form Development 1. Production. 2. Employment. 3. Water Usage. 4. Sewer Connections. 5. Discharge Characteristics. D. Informing Procedures. 1. General notification by public newspaper. 2. Mail and deliver copies of the regulations to each affected industry. 3. Telephone affected industry. • 4. Establish an information source for industry. 5. Establish a local induptrial advisory board. E. Data Collection. 1. Questionnaire mailed to each affected industry. 2. Visitations and inspections as needed. 3. Telephone as needed. 4. Questionnaire followup as needed. 5. Perform sampling and analysis of industries who have the capability of discharging toxic pollutants. 6. Estimates of sludge and other waste generated by pretreatment for off-site disposal. F. Detailed Data Analysis. 1. Develop final list of industries. 2. Confirm initial wet/dry determination and SIC classification. 3. Delineate industries to be induced into a sampling program. G. Public Hearing On Data Acquires; And Alternatives To Be Considered. 1001U/2 Page 3 City of Denton . CITY OF DENTON PRETREATMENT PROGRAM PLAN OF STUDY (Revised) PHASE II III. PRETREATMENT LIMITATION DEVELOPMENT The purpose is to identify the current problems in wastewater collection treatment resulting from the discharge of Industrial waste, if any, and the level of control necessary to overcome these problems. A. Prohibited Discharge Pollutants. 1. Identification of problems in operations. a. Sample the influent and effluent of the POTW. h. Perform analysis for the prohibitive discharge pollutants. 2. Development of POTW tolerance to problem pollutants. at Review of operating history. b. Review of existing limitations for prohibited pollutants which may also be sub;ect to categorical discharge standards. c. Review existing literature? on activated sludge treatment of prohibited discharge pollutants. d. Assess pollutant removal in existing treatment works. 3, Development of specific limits for problem and prohibited discharges. B. Categorical Standards Requirements. 1. Review for applicability. 2. Identification of problems in operations, if any. a. Sample the influent and effluent of the POTW b. Perform analysis for the categorical discharge pollutants. i IOUlU/3 Page 4 City of Denton 3. Development of POTW tolerance to problem pollutants. a. Review operating history. b. Review existing literature on activated sludge treatment of categorical discharge pollutants. c. Development of specific limits for problem and prohibited discharges. d. Assess pollutant removal in existing treatment works. 4, kevieW the potential for deviations from National Standards, either by local credits or fundamentally different factors. IV. EVALUATION OF LEGAL AUTHORITIES The purpose of this section of the program is to insure that the City of Denton has the legal authority to effectively enforce the Pretreatment Program. A. Review Technical Data Accumulated In 111. Pretreatment Limitation Development. 1. Evaluate current problems present in treatment system, if any. 2. Review treatment works tolerance to priority pollutants. 3. Review pollutant removal capabilities of existing system. B. Evaluate Effectiveness Of Existing Sewer Use Ordinance. 1. Amend current Sewer Use Ordinance based on local needs. 2. Develop new Sewer Use Ordinance. 1001U/4 Page 5 City of Denton • C. Develop Provisions To Be Enacted Into Sewer Use Ordinance. 1. Federal and local limitations. 2. Discharge Permit for Industrial users. 3. Enforcement procedures. 4, Penalties. 5. Reporting requirements. 0. Prepare Enforcement Documents. 1. Violation Notice. 2. Permit to Discharge. 3. Pretreatment Agreement. 4, Repc,' of Analysis. E. Draft Ordinance And Enforcement Procedures. F. Public Nearing On Proposed Sewer lase Ordinance And Program Development. G, Submit Draft Ordinance And Enforcement Procedures To EPA And State For Review And Cowments. • H, Expected Date To Enact Local Ordinance, V, DESIGN OF A MONITORING/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM A. Update Industrial User Information. 1. All commercial customers will be assigned an SIC number when activating water service. 2. All new commercial customers corresponding to the f oliowing SIC t required to complete a user survey form. 3. Information entered into data processing customer billing. 4, Annual computer printout of all I/C accounts categorized as major industrial/commercial users complete with last 12 month average water consumption, account number, SIC number, 5. Included new I/C account on montoring program . schedule as appropriate, 1007U/5 ,Page 6 City of Denton B. Notification To Industrial Users Of New Or Program Changed Pretreatment Standards and Information. 1. Users categorization by SIC number. 2. Subscribe to BWA water pollution control series to maintain current development information. 3. Maintain contact with EPA Pretreatment Program for updated program. C. Reporting From Industries Affected By Categorical Standards. 1. Receive and analyze baseline monitoring report. 2. Establish schedule and construction progress reports. 3. Receive and analyze self-monitoring reports. 0. Conduct Compliance Monitoring. 1. Require those industries affected by categorical standard to establish control man hole for compliance monitoring. 2. Establish sampling frequency and procedures. a. Random. b. Periodic. 3. Establish chain of custody procedures. 4. Develop analytical methods and capabilities required. 5. Develop compliance tracking system. E. Investigations Of Non-compliance. 1. Written notification of the violation. 2. Establish specific time limit for response and compliance activities. 3. Notification of charges associated with sampling and analysis of non-compliance discharge. F. Conduct Enforcement Procedures. 1. Submit non-compliance activities to Jtilities Review Committee. 2. Initiate decision of URC. 3. Maintain public-noticing of major violators. l0U)U/6 Page 7 City of Denton G. Development Of Heeds To Accomplish Monitoring Program. 1. Establish information management system necessary to integrate pretreatment program. 2. Develop storage and filing system. 3. Staffing levels required. 19 1007U/7 Page 8 City of Denton CITY OF DENTON PRETREATMENT PROGRAM PLAN OF STUDY (Revised) PHASE III VI. EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL AND REVENUE SOURCES A. Legal Authority To Collect Revenues. 1. Costs charged back to industries in equitable fashion. 2. Periodical adjustments to system to reflect actual cost. 6. Establish Potential Costs Of Pretreatment Program. 1. General overhead costs. 2. Administrative costs. a. Administrative salaries. b. Recordkeeping. 1) Wages. • 2) Equipment and supplies. 3. Operation and maintenance costs. a. Labor. 4. Sampling costs. a. Labor. b. Equipment and supplies. 6. Enforcement costs. a. Court costs. b. Appeal costs. c. Attorney fees. d. Damages to POTV. C. Develop Funding Necessary To Accomplish Program Activities. . 1. Evaluate current funding sources and levels. a. Annual operating budget. b. User charge. c. I/C surcharge. 2. Develop new revenue sources as appropriate. 1007U/8 Page 9 City of Denton VII. LABORATORY EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT MONITORING PROGRAM A. Description Of Existing Equipment And Facilities Available For Use In A Pretreatment Program. 1. Transportation equipment. 2. Sampling equipment. 3. Analytical/laboratory equipment. 4. Administrative facility: B. List Of Proposed Equipment And Facilities Needed To Carry-out The Pretreatment Program. 1. Transportation equipment. 2. Sampling equipment. 3. Analytical/laboratory equipment. 4. Administrative facility. C. Purchase Of Additional Equipment And Construct Facilities As Need Arises. • VIII. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR PROHIBITED POLLUTANTS A. Provide Specific Recommendations For Prohibited Discharge Standards. 1. Fire or explosion hazards. 2. pH. 3. Solid or viscous pollutants. 4. Any pollutant of such volume or strength as to cause interference at POTW. 5. Heat in amounts which might inhibit biological activity. B. Provide Specific Recommer,d:tions For Local Discharge Standards. 1. Any pollutant significantly contributing to a violation of the City's NPOES permit. 2. Any pollutant that will limit sludge disposal or use options. 1007U/9 Page 10 City of Denton • IX. APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM "APPROVAL" A. Introduction. B. Outline. 1. Transmittal letter. a. Reason for program development. b. POTW position on removal credits. c. Description of past industrial program. d. Conditional approval request. 2. Table of Contents. 3. Program submittal. a. General description/summary. b. Development of program. c. Programs implementation. 4. Appendix. a. Ordinance/rules. . b. Funding mechanisms. c. Sample form. d. Appropriate public comment. e. List of equipment/laboratory facilities. 1007U/10 EXHIBIT II COST SUMMARY INDUSTRIAL Pff-T EN PROGRAM'1980 • PHASE I I. BACKGROUND Not eligible for funding N/£ II. EDUCATION AND TRAINING Not eligible for funding N/E 111. INDUSTRIAL WASTE SURVEY A. Identification of Affected Users No Funds Requested 5 0 B. Preliminary Data Analysis No Funds Requested 5 0 C. Questionnaire Survey Form Development- No Funds Requested E 0 D. Informing Procedures No Funds Requested $ 0 E. Data Collection Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 No Funds Requested 5 0 Item 5 Funding Requested (See Schedule I) $19,628.00 F. Detailed Data Analysis No Funds Requested $ 0 PHASE 11 1. PRETREATMENT LIMITATION DEVELOPMENT A. Prohibited Discharge Pollutants B. Categorical Standards Requirements Funding Requested (See Schedule II) $10,056.00 II. EVALUATION OF LEGAL AUTHORITIES Funding Requested (See Schedule I) $ 3,200.00 III. DESIGN OF MONITORING/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM Funding Requested (See Schedule I) 5 1,200.00 • TOTAL REQUEST $34,084.00 IOO7U/11 EXHIBIT III PHASE III FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY VI. EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL AND REVENUE SOURCES No Funds Requested $ 0 VII. LABORATORY EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT THE MONITORING PROGRAM (Additional Detail- Exhibit IV) A. Description of existing equipment & facilities B. List of Proposed Equipment & facilities 1. Transportation Equipment No funds requested 0 2. Sampling Equipment $ 7j657.00 3. Analytical/Laboratory Equip. $35,741.00 4. Administrative Facility S 51280.00 • C. Purchase of Additional Equipment No Funds Requested $ 0 VIII. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR PROHIBITED POLLUTANTS No Funds Requested S 0 IX. APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM "APPROVAL" $ 0 TOTAL REQUEST $48,678.00 10070/12 Page I City of Denton EXHIBIT IV S. LIST OF PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 1. Transportation equipment- No funds requested 2. Sampling- Equipment: The proposed funding request will allow the City two complete sampling outfits enabling the City crew to sample two sites per day: Model 2100 sampler w/multiplexer S 31372 Model 1870 Recording bubbler Flow Meter S 2,910 Leopold-Lagco Insert type flume 80 5 650 Leopold-Lagco Insert type Flume 10" S 725 TOTAL S 7,657 3. Analytical/Laboratory Equipment a) Accessories for the Perkin-Elmer Model 4000 Atomic . Absorption Spectrophotometer with HGA400 graphite fu-ance AS-50 Autosampler for flame atomic absorption: $ 4,110 Includes control unit, sampling table, carousel and cover, three stainless steel probes, polyethylene tubing, a ra;k of 125 polystyrene test tubes, beaker for solvent aspirations and appropriate spare parts. AS-40 Autosampler for HGA 400-Graphite Furnace: o$ 11700 Microcomputer-controlled Autosampler for 35 samples, automatic method of additions using two procedures, automatic matrix modification and automatic triggering of instrument calibration. Model 056 Dual-Channel Multirangz • Recorder: S 3,275 Used for simultaneous recording of AA-8G and BG (background correction) signals with the Model 4000 1007U/13 Page 2 City of Denton Nitrous Oxide Burner Head: $ 360 • Required when using nitrous oxide acetylene flames for determination of refractory metals. Manual Lamp Turret; S 13080 Holds six lamps for operation in the Model 4000 atomic absorption spectro- photometer Intensitron Lamp current Reverser: S 60 Reverses current through the lamp which improves the performance of older or seldom used lamps Eight (8) Electrodeless Discharge lamps S 29575 EDL are usually much brighter than the corresponding hollow cathode lamps and are preferred for high precision analyses or for determinations which are "noisy" due to weak hollow cathode lamp emmision. TOTAL ATOMIC ABSORPTION ACCESSORIES $190160 b) Accessories for the Sigma 115 Gas Chromatograph with the Sigma I Data Station; Model AS-100 Artomatic Sampler: S 69290 Supplied complete for mounting on Sigma Series gas chromatographs. Includes microprocessor controller, crimp-top vials, vial caps and crimper tool. Detector Maintenance Kit: S 175 Consists of adjusting tools and spare jets Detector Evaluation Kit: S 150 Includes test column and three vials of • test solution to evaluata performance of FID, 4WD9 NPD, FPD and ECO. 1007U/14 Page 3 City of Denton Sigma I _Battery Backup: S 500 Maintains current to the consol for up • to 8 hours in the event of a line power failure thus preserving information and memory. Multiplexer: $ 350 Allows automatic metering of 2 detector signals into the same data channel for Sigma I - detectors 1 & 2 only. Priority Pollutant Columns for the Gas Chromatograph: f 11185 Priority pollutant columns to meet require- ments proposed by EPA test methods for water pollutants. Column Packing Material: $ 780 Packing suggested in proposed EPA test methods for water pollutants. Column Installation & Filling Accessories: S 546 includes tool kit, column caps, column • tags, restrictors vibrograver. TOTAL CHROMATOGRAPH ACCESSORIES: $ 90976 C) Laboratory Equipment Leak Detection Unit: $ 730 Detects gas leaks around fittings with- out liquid leak detectors, extremely sensitive to both helium and hydrogen, detects minute amount of leakage. Sample Injection Syringes: $ 321 Microliter Pipets (fixed & Variable): $ 560 Sample Bottle and Vials: $ 289 Sample Concentration & Clean-up Accessories S 906 Accessories: Include Kudera-Danish apparatus micro and macro concentrator, Snyder macro concentrator with micro connectors, volatile purge and trap. TOTAL LABORATORY EQUIPMENT $ 29806 1007U/15 Page 4 City of Denton d) Laboratory Chemicals & Reagents ACS Quality Chemicals $ 788 Pesticide Quality Solvents $ 684 Priority Pollutant standards $ 750 Gas Chromatogra h Internal Standards $ 112 Reagent Required for Electron Capture Detection $ 65 TOTAL CHEMICALS & REAGENTS $ 29399 e) Equipment Installation: Includes cost of installation of atomic absorption spectrophotometer and gas chromatograph accessories. TOTAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION S 11400 4. Administrative Facility Information Management System using mini- computer application: features would include 16 bit minicomputer, 128K to 8M bytes memory, expandable memory, floppies or hard disk, printer with graphics, optional tape-drive. TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITY 5,28t? TOTAL ANALYTICAL/LABORATORY EQUIP CyT 3489675 1O07U/16 CERTIFICATE OF AUYHffi CIYY_.-• THIS IS TO CIPTIFY that the m1crophelooraphe appoorino on this plfm•Irllo ShrN with CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET -10/05/82 and M 1lndlwith CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET ate g w accurate and complol• reptoductloni of the retirds of (Company and Depl,) CITY OF DEttTON - CITY SECRETARY ...._.__as delivered In the regular course of buslness for photographing$ ft Is further certined that the micropholographic processes were accomplished in i rnannot and on Alm which meets with requirements of the National Bureau of Standards hr permanent mlctophologrop4ic copy. .jg"a - Rego da (C;omp_rf)l 1b ww) TECMn0i0GY AT(*gftK C..r~ 0r~ PI.ACEt 6m vkQt%Perk BW State Arlington, Texas 76010