Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-19-82 NO'clu Ut. w'.4K Sj SSIU~ - RL: - SPECIAL CALLED - EMERUNCY ?MEETING OF THE (IF THE CITY OF DENTO,N, ' 'XAS. Notice is hereby given t at oI the day of ,Ir7274 , ly, the ~e City of Denton, Texas 11 hold a work session - ego au special called e:ner g.c en y eeting at o'clock, M in it tie r _ ~~of the Municipal Bui ng ocated at 215 last R1 nney, Denton, IM as. The subjects 'to be considered are listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and stake a part of this notice. If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the hoard/Conwission should determine that an executive meeting of the Board/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should be held or is rtquired, then such executive meeting or consultation witn the City's attorney as authorized by Article 62SZ-17 Revised Civil Statutes of 'T'exas will be held by the Board/Commission at the date, hour, and place given in this notice or as soon after the commencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the Board/Comwiss ion may conveniently meet in such executive meeting, or consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and for any and all purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section 2(p),_.inclusive, of said article 6252-17, including, but not limited to:- Section 2(c), Section 2(e), Section 2(f), Section 2(g), and Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda. Should any find action, final *decision, or final vote be requiri.d in the opinion of the Board/Commission with regard to any matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation %;it.h the City's attorney, then such final action, final decision, or final vote: shall be at either: (a) ttie public meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of this }public neeting, or (b) at a subsequent public meetin; of the Board/Commission upon notice thereof, as the board/Commission shall determine. Un t1tis day Qf Z;~~_, ly , the original of thi.c instrument was filed among the otficial records of the City of Denton, lexas, and an original copy bas posted on the bulletin board in the main lobby of the Municipal Building of the City -of Denton at _ o'clock, -vii. on said date. CEiAIRLUl'TF ALE,L:N, CITY SEIRHTAKY CITY U: UNTO:N, 'T'EXAS 712140 loll ev AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 19, 1982 1. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of an Independent Contractors Agreement to C. H. Rodgers in the Amount of $16,350 for Consultant Services for Major Repair of Turbine ff5. B. Approval of an Independent Contractors Agreement to General Electric Company for $8,370 for Consultant Services for Major Repair of Turbine ~5. 04e5C 41 I\O.1'1CE OF WORK SE S,ION EGUL SPECIAL CALLEU - EMERGENCY MEETING OF THE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEX . Notico is hereby vjvarr teat on the day of , ly the o M1 City of Denton, Texas 1 hold a tiror• session - re u - special called"- emergency eeting at o'clock, m., in the 4 A. , Jd d- of the Muriieipal Bui ing oeated at 215 Las mcl%inney, Denton, Texas. The subjects to be considered are listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and make a part of this notice. If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the Board/Commissions should determine that an executive meeting of the Board/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should be held or is required, them such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney as authorized by Article 6252-17 Revised Civil Statutes of 'texas will be held by the hoard/Commission at the date, hour, and place given in this notice or as soon after the commencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the Board/Commission may conveniently meet in such executive meeting, or consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and for any and all purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section 2(p),., inclusive, of said Article 6252-17, including, but riot limited to:- Section 2(c), Section 2(e), Section 2(f), Section 2(g), and Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda. r Should any final action, final decision, or final vote be required in the opinion of the board/Commission with regard to any matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney, then such final action, final decision, or final vote shall be at either: (a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of this public meeting, or (b) at a subsequent public meeting of the hoard/Commission upon notice thereof, as the Board/Commission sl►all determine. Uri ttlis _Ley 14, day of , 19 the original of 51 this instrunent was filet among the official records of the City of Denton, 'T'exas, and an original copy was posted on the bulletin board in the main lobby of the %Iunicipil Building of the City •cf Denton at o'clock, n3. on said date. L! L LHARLUTTE AI.I,LN, CI'T'Y SECRETARY CITY OF Uli,NTO:`, TEXAS 02140 EMERGENCY ADDENDUM AGEN DA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 19, 1982 1. Adoption of a Resolution in Appreciation of Ms. Gwen Smale of the Texas Municipal Power Agency. < 04710 ►COTICE OF WORK SESSIU` - LGULA - SPECIAL CALLEU - EMERGENCY MEE'PIHG OF THE: OF THE CI'T'Y OF DENTON, '1' .'AS. ,V'otice is hereby v,i es tlla on the day of , 19 the a t e City of Denton, Texas i+~ 110 a tircrk session - r uf-n 1-3 - special called emerge icy me ting at o'clock, n., in the ~of the Municipal Bui ing ocated at 21S East McKinney) Denton, Texas. The subjects 'to be considered are listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and make a part of this notice. If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the Board/Commission should determine that an executive meeting of the Board/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should be held or is required, then such executive meeting or consultation witn the City's attorney as authorized by Article 6252-17 Revised Civil Statutes of 'texas will be held by the Board/Commission at the date, hour, and place given in this notice or as soon after the commencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the Board/Commission may conveniently meet in such executive meeting, or consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and for any and all purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section 2(p),..inclusive, of said Article 6252-17, including, but not limited to:--Section 2(c), Section 2(e), Section 2(f), Section 2(g), and Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda. Should any final action, final decision, or final vote be required in the opinion of the Board/Commission with regard to any matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney, then such final action, final decision, or final vote sh,ail be at either: (a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of this public meeting, or (b) at a subsequent public meeting o: the Board/Commission upon notice thereof, as the Board/Cocuiission shall determine. Oil this /l day of ~ ~i__. 19 the original of this instrument was filed among tl6c official records of the City of Uentun, 'T'exas, and an original copy was posted on the bulletin board in the main lobby of the Municipal Building of the City -of Menton at o'clock, m. on said date. C4IAIZLU'l'7'1 ALI.i:~, CITY ;LCRLTAKY CITY OF El NTO:V, TEXAS U214C 'y7P EMERGENCY ADDENDUM C~ I CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 19, 1982 7:00 P.M. to i the concerning City r of nCrossroadsl Texasy of Denton Landfill adjacent Resolution Operation of a 069OM-6 ~ .Y . it E S O L U T 1 0 M WHEREAS, the City of Denton is ! e process of purchasing land for a new Imndfillp and WHEREAS, the City of Denton to now preparing plans and specifications for submitting an application to the Texas Realth Department for such new landfills NOW, TREREFOREt BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TOE CITY OF DEN1'GNr TEXASI SECTION I. The City Council of the City of Denton hereby resolves to remain at the existing landfill site in Crossroads, Texas only until the new landfill site is permitted and the City of Denton can commence the use of the new landfill site in Denton# Texas. SECTION 110 The City council resolves t;'st the City of Denton will follow the plan submitted to the Texas Health Department on August 300 1982 and/or any other adjustments or changer, that the Texas Health Department deems necessary for the continued operation of the landfill in Crossroads, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1982. RICHARD 0. ST9WXXT-*-"RKM CITY OF OENTONi TEXAS ATTEM VICKI WESTLING, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLORo JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: C . tCI AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 19, 1982 1. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of an Independent Contractors Agreement to C. H. Rodgers in the Amount of $16,350 for Consultant Services for Major Repair of Turbine #5. 8. Approval of an Independent Contractors Agreement to General Electric Company for $8,370 for Consultant Services for Mdjor Repair of Turbine i5. 0465C EMERGENCY ADDENDUM AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 13, 1962 1. Adoption of a Resolution ir) Appreciation of Ms. Gwen Smale of the Texas Municipal Power Agency. 04710 EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 19, 1982 7;00 P.M. Approval of a Resolution concerning the present City of Denton Landfill Operation adjacent to the City of Crossroads, Texas. 069OM-6 • R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton Is in the process of purchasing land for a new landfills and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is now preparing plans and specifications for submitting an application to the Texas Health Department for such new landfills HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt SECTION I_ The City Council of the City t: Denton hereby resolves to remain at the existing landfill site in Crossroads, Texas only until the new landfill site is permitted and the City of Denton can commence the use of the new landfill site in Denton, Texas. SECTION It. The City Council resolves that the City of Denton will fo'low the plan submitted to the Texas Health Department on t August 300 1982 and/or any other adjustments or changes that the Texas Health Department deems necessary for the continued operation of the landfill in Crossroads, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of r 1982. RICHARD 0. R CITY OF D£NTON, TEXAS ATTESTi VICKI WESTLING, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AE TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS G.~ 1 By MEMORANDUM Dates October 15, 1982 Tos Mayor and City Co'Incil and City Manager FromsJeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development Res Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application Because CDBG meetings were taking place this week, your agenda does not contain backup on the CDBG item. The following is presented to brief you as best as possible before next Tuesday's City Council meeting. Very recently the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (BUD) finally announced the new rules and ranking procedures for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) appli- cations. The program is approximately a year behind schedule so that whe,i the new procedures were announced, potential applicants were forced into a rushed situation. The C08G Coinmittee held two hearings this week and received almost no response. For various reasons it may have been a bad week for meetings, but experience has shown that there really are not any good weeks. I Suspect that the public's interest in the CDBG pro- gram has wained because there are no current projects to relate to and the past two apoatttntionswhenetherecissnotla reward difficult to keep peoples' for efforts expended. It may be just as well that the public did not become actively involved. Denton's chances of being funded are net very good. A very complicated rating system is used by HUD to rank applica- tions (copy enclosed). The demography of Denton works against the city's chances of being funded. The city is a tittle too small for the entitlement program and a little too large for the Small Cities Program. Thus I think it would be unwise to build up peoples' hopes that assistance is forthcoming. Memorandum Mayor, City Council and City Manager CDBG application Page 2 The CBDG Committee nevertheless did expend considerable time studying the possibilities of application this year. Moat of their. deliberations centered around past citizen response and how it could fit into the new regulations. it was fortunaLe that the veteran members of the committee were active so that past requests could be considered. Three of the four new appointees did not attend the meetings. The committee is recommending applying for two programs under the Single Purpose provisions of the Small Cities Program. The ceil- ing amount of $500,000 will be sought. The committee proposes three activities. Public works activity would include the improvement, curb, gutter and intersection re- alignment of Robertson Street. This is the last major street in the original target area that is in need of improvement. Housing activity would include a program to either remove or rehabilitate for use by low to moderate income families all vacant structures in the core target area, a three block area from Bell Avenue to the square. Relevant administrative costs are the third item. It is felt by the committee and staff that while the chances of funding stilt, are not promising, these activities have the pros- pect of a higher rating by HUD and would benefit the community. Council approval of this concept will allow the staff to assemble the application that is due to HUD in tuo weeks. Time is short, prospects are less than rosey, but the proposed program seems to be worth the effort. FUNDS AVAILABLE APPENDIX A After substraoting funds for all multiyear commitments, the remaining funds will be divided as follows: Texas - 75% Single Purpose 25% Comprehensive New Mexico - 60% Single Purpose 40% Comprehensive This distribution of funds is subject to change if any of the following occur: 1. There is insufficient demand for Comprehensive grants to justify the amount identified; or 21 There is a demand for Comprehensive grants which would justify a reservation of more than amount identified; or 3. There is such a small amount of funds available in the balance as to make a split between types impracticable; or 5 1O Z Q 4. There is no demand for one type of grant; or ,15 5. We determine that there are an insufficient number of Q applications for one type of grant which meet the statutory objectives of the program; or 6. The funds remaining in any one category, are insufficient to fund the next highest ranked project; or 7. The qtpeneither grant eso poor that they would not merit consideration for funding, Funds Available - The following are the estimated amounts available for the competition and the general limits on grant amounts allowed to an applicant. Alloc__ations - The estimated amounts available in each category are: Multiyear Single ensive Comprehensive Purpose Dallas Area Office Compreh _ Texas $3g,~o3,000 $17,7199000 $5,271,000 $15,W,000 New Mexico $9,329,000 $ 20954,500 $20549,800 $ 3,824,700 QO" 3 • 2 Amounts subject to change based on funding of multiyear Comprehensives and recaptured funds. Ceilings - Tate grant ceilings for each type of application are: Comprehensive $800,000 57 0 • Z~ 2 Single Purpose $500,000 YP .15 R P~ Individual Grant Amounts - While grant ceilings establish the general limits which may be requasted, individual grants will be invited only in amounts commensurate with your si•%e and the proposed program. In determining appropriate individual grant amounts, we will consider: 1. Population - Requesting the ceiling amount is not appropriate in all cases. We will consider your capacity to operate and/or maintain the proposed project as well as the rela- tionship of your size to the funds requested. As a guide, an acceptable relationship between the size of a community and the amount of funds requested may be evaluated by applying the following norms: Grants - $300 per person in the community or the limits noted above, whichever is less. 2. Need - The severity of the need Vill be exaaa.zed based on generally available facts and data, as well as your ability to meet the need through other sources of funds. 3. Proposed Activities - Close review of programs/activities that would involve unusually expensive solutions to needs will be made. Activities which would alleviate the problems of only a very small segment of the total need will also be care- fully screened. 4. Ability to carry out the proposed program - This determination will be based on such factors as previous program performance, experience, staff and the scope of the proposed programs. 5. Previous funding levels and previous rate of expenditure for communities which have been CDBO grant recipients. 6. In accordance with the above guidelines, the Area Office may determine that a lesser amount than requested is appropriate; therefore, it may '-e necessary to revise and rerate your pro- posed program. The Area Office reserves the right to reduce the grant to an amount which it deems reasonable to cover the cost of the proposed activities. THE REVIEW METHOD APPENDIX B An initial determination will be made on threshold requirements including program objectives, capacity, performance and eligibility of activities by a Community Development Representative, a Program Manager and the Chief of the Program Management Branch. Applications will be rated and ranked in a(:cordance with the National Selection System after the applicant is determined to have met the following thresholds: 1. Have the capacity to administer a Community Development Block Grant Program 2. Have performed adequately 3. Designed a program of eligible activities each of which meets the selected statutory objective Data to rate the Needs factors are supplied by the Bureau of the Census. This factor does not need to be addressed in the application. Committees composed primarily of CPD staff and supplemented where appropriate by staff from Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Economic Market Analysis and Housing Divisions of the Area Office and a State Representative will rate the following factors: 1. Program Impact 2. Outstanding Performance a, Fair Housing b. Local Equal Opportunity efforts 0 STANDARDS FOR JUDGING PROGRAM PERFORMANCE APPENDIX C Threshold Standards - Capacity and Performance 1. No grant will be made to an applicant that does not have the capacity to undertake the proposed program. Capacity and per- formance considerations are in Section 570.423.(c) of the Regulations. 2. Generally, applicants which have not previously received block grant assistance will not be subjected to threshold and capa- city reviews. However, where it is generally known to the Area Office that the applicant is in apparent non-compliance with specific provisions of the threshold requirements, the Area Office may subject the applicant to the performance and capacity review procedures and reject the application for such non-compliance. For example, in the case of a city or county which has limited assisted housing or none at all and the Area Office has evidence that the situation exists because the applicant has taken steps to impede such housing, the Area Office may choose not to consider the application. 3. If you have previously participated in the Block Grant Program, you must have performed adequately. The standards below will be used as benchmarks in judging per- formance but will not be the sole basis for performance judgments. If you fail to meet the percentages, you should provide other evidence of progress and compliance with program requirements. Progress FY 77 recipients must have closed out their grants. FY 78 & earlier - closed, 4011 executed FY 79 - 100% drawdown & project activities complete FY 80 - 80% drawdown FY 81 projects on schedule; copy of 1981 schedule reflecting status of progress--must be with application. 4. Housing Performance - Achieved HAP goals or has used available housing resources to the extent feasible to meet its HAP goals. Special consideration will be given regarding any 2 actions taken by the applicant to prevent the provision of assisted housing. Indicate if you applied for housing assistance to HUD and/or Farmers Home since 1975 and were turned down. Provide dates of your requests and tha datep they were rejected. Threshold Standards - Eligibility and Program Objectives Eligibility determinations will be made on each activity based on the regulations at 24 CFR 570, Subpart C. Subpart C is being rewrit- ten to reflect the changes of the 1981 Amendment to the Housing and Community Development Act or 1974; however, the new Subpart C will not become effective before applications are received. Though some of the regulations for eligible activities have been superseded by statutory change, waiver of the regulations, where they are inconsistent with the law, is not always necessary. With regard to the four statutory changes - no waiver of the regulations is needed if an applicant wishes to comply with new statutory provisions for public services, unless the applicant wishes to spend more than 10% of its grant on public Zervices. - no waiver of the regulations is required if the applicant wishes to provide assistance to private, for-profit enti- ties, when the assistance is necessary or appropriate to carry out an economic development project. - for public facilities not otherwise specified in the regu- lations as eligible, the activity must meet the criteria for Q HUD approval at 570.201(c)(14) or 570.203(b); if the activity does not meet the criteria, a waiver of the special requirements of these sections must be requested. - for newly eligible comprehensive planning activities, the activity must meet the criteria for HUD approval at 570.205(a); if the activity does not meet the criteria, a waiver of the special requirements of this section must be requested. Any request for waivers should be submitted as soon as possible, preferably before the application is submitted. In addition, each activity will he reviewed to determine that itV meets the requirements of 570.420(k) in benefitting low and moderate G ' v" ' ~O 3 income persons, or aiding in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight or meets other urgent needs. Applicants must indicate on form HUD-4124.2, "Community Development Activities," which one(s) of the three statutory program objectives each activity is designed to address. The following will be used in determining if an activity meets one of the broad national objectives. 1. Activities that will be considered to benefit low and moderate imaome persons. (a) any activity, other than rehabilitation, that is designed or located so that the majority of beneficiaries are low r .-and moderate income persons. (i) The area served has a majority of lair and moderate income residents. . (ii) Economic development designed to create or retain permanent jobs the majority of which will be available to low and moderate income persons (iii) Facilities used principally by low and moderate income persons. ~(iv) Benefits low and moderate i=come persons exlusively based on income eligibility requirement. (b) A special project directed to removal of material and architectural barriers. An activity that must be carried out prior to or as an integral part of another activity which will principally benefit low and moderate income persons. (d) Rehabilitation - (i) Single family residential units occupied by low and moderate income households (100x). (ii) Multifamily residential structures where more than half of the units are occupied (affordable) after rehabilitation by low and moderate income households. (e) An eligible activity in support of new construction of multifamily non-elderly housing where at least 20% of the wry ~y 4 units will be occupied by low and moderate income housa- holds. 2. Activities that aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight (a) Any activity which is carried out in and designed to upgrade a slum or blighted area: (i) the area meets the definition of slum, blighted deteriorated or deteriorating under State or local law or (ii) there are objectively determinable signs of physical deterioration throughout the area Residential rehabilitation can meet this standard only if each structure rehabilitated is considered substandard and the substandard items are corrected before any less critical work is assisted. (b) aetivitie9 designed to eliminate specific conditions of blight )r physical decay on a spot basis anywhere in the locality except rehabilitation assistance to non-low and moderate income household qualifies only to the extent necessary to eliminate specific conditions detrimental to public health and safety. (e) activities necessary to complete Federally-assisted urban renewal projects 3. An activity will be concluded to meet community development needs having a particular urgency if the recipient certifies: The activity is designed to alleviate an existing serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community; the threat is of rec.nt origin or recently became urgent; and the applicant cannot finance it on its own nor find other sources of funds. Each separate activity that serves a specific area will be con- sidered on the basis of that service area. 7lannir„ and administration costs are considered to meet the pri- mary objectives. 5 Further discussion of review for compliance with statutory objec- tives can be found at 570.420(k) of the Small Cities Regulations. Other Thresholds 1. Audit Findings_ An application will not be accepted from any community that has an unresolved audit finding for an HUD program undertaken by the community or has an outstanding monetary obligation to HUD. This requirement also applies to applicants who have Public Housing Authorities with unresolved audit findings con- cerning housing units which were allocated to the grant reci- pient to assist implementation of its HAP goals. Waivers to this prohibition will depend on the degree of seriousness of instance shall a waiver be each outstanding finding; jut in no provided when funds are due HUD, unless a satisfactory .arrangement for repayment of the debt has been made. This arrangement must be made with this office PRIOR TO SUBMISS104 OF THE APPLICATION. Requests for waivers must be submitted to HUD Area Office no later than the application deadline for 1982. Waivers to this prohibition may only be granted by the Regional Administrator. The Dallas Area Office will submit the requests for waivers to the Regional Administrator wl:o has the authority to grant waivers to this prohibition when it is deemed appropriate. 2. Monitoring Findings Unresolved findings made as a result of HUD monitoring will be considered in rating the performance of an applicant, and again the degree of seriousness of the finding will be con- sidered in rating performance. The performance of any appli- cant which has an outstanding monetary obligation to HUD or its Community Development Program as a result of a monitoring visit, will be rated as unsatisfactory and its application will not be eligible to advance to the ranking and rating process unless, of course, a satisfactory arrangement is made with HUD for repayment of the debt PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF TFM APPLICATION. No applications will be considered under either the Single Purpose Program or the Comprehensive Program for applicants whose performance or capacity is rated as unsatisfactory. P RATI G SYSTEM STANDARDS ^./V- APPENDIX D Needs Factor - Comprehensive and Single Purpose (150 points) The Comprehensive and Single Purpose Program Needs factors are rated in the same manner. The absolute numb.:r of poverty persons and the percent of poverty persons are rated using data supplied by the Bureau of the Census which is available for every potential applicant. This data is supplied to the Area Office and need not be addressed in the application. Impact of Proposed Program - Comprehensive and Single Purpose Grants (400 points) Reviews will be conducted using the nine considerations listed in r the program regulations as applicable. The following information pro- vides general guidance in this regard. Adequate and tangible documen- tation is critical in each instance. 1. Extent and seriousness of need ~ The more severe and immediate the need~Ythe~highe thirg. A project to provide water to an area presently without water would have greater impact than a project to simply increase water pressure. Projects to deal with occupied dilapidated housing (clearance and relocation) would rate higher than simple cosmetic housing rehabilitation. A project to save a major employer has higher impact than one to attract new industry on a largely speculative basis. 2. Results to be achieved r _ 01 This factor considers the relative degree to which identified needs will be resolved. A project which would fully (100%) and lastingly resolve all identified needs would have greater impact than one which only partially or temporarily resolves the problems. 3. Number of beneficiaries The higher the absolute number of persons benefitting from the project, the greater the impact, for comparable types of programs (e.g., single-family housing rehabilitation compared with similar single-family housing rehabilitation programs; water distribution projects compared with other water distri- bution projects; industrial development projects compared with other industrial development projects; etc.). • ♦ 2 4. Nature of benefit In addition to the nature of benefit concerns considered under other factors, this item evaluates-dirp2* varsus JadJxA benefit. For example, a new industry provides direct benefits to its employees through wages and indirect benefits to the community as a whole through additional taxes, communitywide income enhancement, etc. Street paving provides the most direct benefit to residents in'the project area while providing secondary benefits to all street users. Housing rehabilitation most directly assists the occupant, but also in the overall upgrading of toe neighborhood. 5. Additional actions needed to resolve need Highest priority will be given to projects which will be completed with no additional actions needed to resolve iden- tified needs, or projects which have firm commitments for any additional needed resources. Projects which will require additional actions for which no firm commitments are provided will receive reduced priority. b. Previous coordinative actions Projects which are shown to be a part of a coordinated, on- going program of related community development actions will receive higher consideration than an isolated and/or uncoor- dinated project. 7. Environmental considerations Projects with critical unresolved environmental concerns which would clearly prevent or delay program completion will receive lower priority than projjrts wl.thout such concerns. 8. Displacement If displacement is likely to occur, consideration will be given to established steps to minimize involuntary displace- ment and reduce any potential adverse effects or hardships on individuals involved. Displacement is not considered to be a negative factor unless the applicant fails to establish ade- quate measures to seal with it. 3 9. Housing site selection standards For projects which involve assisted housing (e.g., purchase of sites; provision of public facilities to potential sites, etc.), sites will be evaluated to determine conformance with housing site selection standards. Firmness of housing de- velopment commitments will be a major consideration. A. Single Purpose Impact Committee While the level of competition has a major bearing upon impact ratings, our experience from previous years gives a general indi- cation of the kinds of projects which meet the given impact standards. The following outline illustrates this for three impact levels: Maximum (400 points); Moderate (200 points); Insignificant (0 points). Economic Conditions 1. Maximum Impact: Project will save an existing major employer or attract a major new employer - well documented - firm evidence of employer commitment - low cost/job. 2. Moderate Impact: Project will attract a major new employer - well documented - relatively firm evidence of employer commitment - relatively low cost/job. ' 3. Insigni*icant Impact: Project is purely speculative with little or no evidence of employer commitment - extremely high cost/job. ' Housin t 'vo, " 1. Maximum Impact: Needs are severe and well documented (i.o., occupied, dilapidated houses) - project will effectively resolve all identified housing needs in target area. 2. Moderate Impact: Needs are severe and well documented., but project will not resolve all identfri-e'~ needs in target areas (frequently did not address occupied, dilapi- dated houses). 3. Insignificant Impact: Inadequate needs documentation and/or extremely limited impact on overall housing needs. Public Facilities 1. Maximum Impact: Need is extremely severe and well docu- mented (i.o., major heal /safety problem - all iden- tified public facility needs in target area to be resolved. 2. Moderate Impact: Read is severe and clearly docv ---ted - not all identified public facility needs intargo. a will be resolved (activities too scattered for maximum impact). 3. Insignificant Impact: No clear evidence of a health/safety problem - problem clearly not a serious one - activities which are designed purely for growth. 8. Comprehensive Impact Criteria For each of the four design criteria that you select, you should describe your need and the results to be achieved in speoi- fie, measurable terms. For each of the program design criteria listed in Section 570.424(0)(1), the following standards will be used by the Area Office: 1, Supports comprehensive neighborhood conservation, stabili- zation and/or revitalization Cy The focus of this criterion is upon the nQJLt QLh.42od; it is not limited to housing. We will measure it in terms of dollars and the extent to which deficiencies in the target area will be addressed. We will look for a balanced multi-purpose approach to resolving the deficiencies housing and infrastructure in a target area. 2. Provides housing choice within the community either ot.tside areas with concentrations of minorities and low and moderate income persons or in a neighborhood which is experiencing revi- tilization and substantial displacement as a result of private reinvestment, by enabling low and moderate income persons to remain in their neighborhoods This criterion is appropriate for selection if your program provides or supports housing opportunities within your com- munity outside areas of concentrations of minorities and lower l tr "r ~ income and/or in neighborhoods experiencing revitalizationa and substantial displacement as a result of private investment. 1 ~ ~ 5 The applicant must document the following: (a) That the communtiy does have areas of concentration of low and moderate income persons and minorities. (b) That the proposed program provides for rehabilitation of vacant units for lower income and minority residents out- side the areas of concentration and/or the proposed program supports housing located outside areas of con- centration throught acquisition, infrastructure, coun- seling or other methods. If the support is to be provided to new enstruction or moderate rehabilitation projects outside concentrated areas, then firm financial commit- ments must have been issued for suc pro cots. (o) If the proposed program will prow.:,-,. h~usin,g choice in a revitalizing neighborhood, the degree of displacement that is occurring in the neighborhoo8 a-n-F iat specific program proposals will mitigate the effects of such displacement and provide housing opportunities for laser income and minority persons within this neighborhood. In communities with no minorities or in communities that are predominantly minority, this criterion may be selected based cn housing choice being provided outside lower income concentrated areas or in the case of revitalizing lower income neighborhoods experiencing substantial displacement, housing choice is being provided in these areas. 39 Supports the, expansion of hojasir. ,for low and moderate income ep rsons providinK additional housin units not previously available "Expansion of housing" may include activities supportive of new construction, rehabilitation of vacant units or conversion to housing units frum a prior non-housing use. Examples include but are not limited to the following: (a) Acquisition of scattered sites outside of areas of low income and minority concentrations where a finanoial com- mitment for construction of the units exists. (b) Provision of utilities of other infrastructure where necessary to construction of the units. b (e) Rehabilitation of vacant units or units not presently being used for residential dwellings to at least Section 8 standards and cost effective energy eon3ervation standards (24 CFR 39). 4. Addresses a serious deficiency in a Community's Lublic faoili- J ties. 1 Public facilities are interpreted to mean utilities, streets, drainage, parks, etc. (a) Consideration will be given to the extent of deficiencies and their relative seriousness. (b) The following factors will be considered: ` (1) The dollar amount of proposed expenditures (2) The percentage of the total program represented by proposed CDBG expenditures (3) The level of the need to be satisfied (4) The effect of the definiency upon the publio facilities 5. Expands or retains employment opportunities The following factors will be considered: (a) The dollar amount of proposed CDBG expenditures (b) The percentage of the total program represented by pro- posed expenditures (e) The level of need to be satisfied (d) The number of permanent jobs to be created and the docu- mentary evidence in support of the number and type and location (o) The number of unemployed and/or underemployed low and moderate income persons who will receive training to qualify them for permanent employment or permanent higher- ekilled employment, 7 b. Attracts or retains business which provides essential services This criterion is related to economic development applicants with programs that attract or retain businesses which provide essential services, particularly to persons of low and moderate income may select this criterion. An essential service is one providing a needed, frequently used service usually at the neighborhood level which contributes to the overall quality of life. Applicants must explain how the service is essential. 7. Removes slums or blighted conditions xamples of projects that could be considered are code enforcement demolition of dilapidated structures or rehabilita- tion of properties. Please note that code enforcement deans active enforcement of a city's codes. The term is not to be used to identify a weed cutting or trash collection program. These types of activities are more appropriately identified as "Interim Activities". The city should specify the codes that have been adopted. The applicant should describe: (a) The extent or seriousness of slums and blight in the neighborhood (b) Ho;a the proposed program will alleviate the conditions desoribed (o) How the proposed funding will have a direct impact on the removal of slums and blight. Additionally, to receive primary consideration, the applicant should describe: (a) The amount of funds budgeted for ongoing code enforcement whoih will continue with local or other funds after :,ik I, completion of the CDBG project. IS (b) How CDBG funds used for rehabilitation will help leverage additional capital from the private sector for revitaliza- tion of the neighborhood. 9. Resolves a serious threat to health or safety You should note that this criterion is for programs which "resolve serious threats to health and safety" rather than s 8 addressing serious deficiencies in public faeiMies as described in criterion 4. The applicant must submit documentation from an appropriate State of Feder-Al agency or official that a serious threat to health and safety exists, The nature, location and extent of the threat must be described. Consideration will be given to the following: (a) The degree, intensity, frequency and impact of the threat (b) Whether the threat will be resolved or merely mitigated by the CDBG project. g, Supports another Federal rP ogram or programs being undertaken in the community or deals with the adverse impaot- of another recent Federal or State action. The other Federal or State rp ogram or action gust be of substantial size or impact in the community in relation to the proposed program. (a) The other Federal program or action must be of substantial size or impact in the community in relation to the pro- posed program. (b) The other Federal programs being supported must be iden- tified and documented, (Projects supported only by General Revenue Sharing Funds will not be counted as "other Federal programs" because such funds are considered local funds upon their receipt by the locality.) The manner in which the CDBG project will "support" the "other Federal programs being undertaken in the community" must be explained, (e) Examples of CDBG projects supporting other Federal programs include the matching of funds and services. It could also include activities that are being carried out within in a coordinated manner to serve a common purpose or objective, (d) The adverse impact of another Federal action must be iden- tified and documented. The positive results of the proj- eot upon the Federal impacts must be explained. (e) Examples of Federal actions which may have an impact are significant personnel expansion or reduction at a military base or other Government facility or major energy projects. 9 10. Supports ever production or conservation In recognition of the critteal need to focus on new methods of producing energy and on means of conserving energy this cri- tirion is included. Because this is a relatively new area, programs which support production or conservation will be examined closely in assessing impact, and benefit to low and moderate income persons. While deliberately not specifying any particular types of activities, it is hoped that imaginative approaches which result in substantial energy conservation or production will be fostered. Some examples of energy production and conservation approaches and resources are contained in the HUD publication "Block Grant Energy Conservation" which is included in your packet. Latins performance in Housing and Local Equal Goportunity Efforts for Comprehensive and Sim Purpose Grants An applicant must specifically state why a claim is being made for RP points in these categories described in Sections 570.424 and 570.428 C(O) of the Regulations. No points will be awarded to applicants that do 2 not claim points , No points will be awarded unless your claim meets the standards described below for each criterion. Housi Efforts - 40 op ints Documentation supporting a claim for points under the following items is the applicant's responsibility. Claims of outstanding performance must be based upon actual accomplishments. Clear precise documentation to this effect will be required. (a) Providing housing for low and moderate income families located in a manner which provides housi choices outside or areas f minori,_,y and low and moderate income concentrations or in a neighborhood whi h is experiencing revitalization and su bstantial displacement as a result of re ivate_ reinvestment b~+ enablin low and moderate e incomme eorso~s to remain in their neighborhood;_ or if the co=unit is Predominantly_ inhabited by persons who are members of minority and/or lose income row s the extent to which assisted housin is distributed throughout the community.- (20 paints) o r To receive 20 points, the applicant must submit a map of the locality showing the assisted housing units (Low Income, Section 8 New Consteuction, Farmers Home, 236, 221(d)(3), 202 10 and any other Federally-assisted housing that may exist in the locality) and a narrative which indicates the number of units and the type of assisted housing. Areas of minority concentration are defined as having a per- cent of minority population equal or greater than the locality's percent of minority population. Areas of low/moderate income persons equal or greater than the locality's percent of low/moderate income persons. Minority and low-income impacted areas must be delineated on the map. If the combined total of assisted housing units located out- side of minority and low-income areas is equal or greater than 75 percent, then points will be awarded; or if a neighborhood(:' in the locality is experiencing revitaliza- tion and substantial displacement as a result of private investment, the applicant could obtain points by demonstrating how such displacement has been mitigated. For example, in this affected neighborhood, how many housing units have been rehabilitated or modernized for occupancy of minorities and/or low income persons. The applicant could also obtain points if the community is predominantly minority and/or lower-income and if it can be demonstrated that assisted housing is distributed throughout the community. (b) Implementation of a HUD-approved New Horizons Fair Ho_ using Assistance Pro ect (or demonstated participation, in a HUD-approved Count;/State/reicionai New Horizons Pro eet) or a fair housing strategy that is equivalent in scope to a flew Horizons Project. (20 points) Z-0 o v- 0 There are no approved flew Horizons projects in small cities within the Dallas Area Office's jurisdiction. Therefore, in order to claim and receive points, a locality must have and submit a copy of a fair housing strategy and the actions taken to implement the streategy. The strategy should con- tain all of these factors but need not be limited to: 1. Local Compliance Activities a. An active enforcement of a Fair Housing Ordinance (having a Fair Housing Ordinance only without some other element of a Fair Housing strategy will not earn points under this rating factor). b. A study of land usage and zoning to determine whether these practices are exclusionary. 41 2. A Fair Housing Educational program to inform the com- munity about local and Federal policies against discrimination. 3. Develop a method to assist minority families with housing needs and concerns such as: a, a housing information center or cooperate on contract with an existing fair housing infor- mation center, b, develop and circulate a listing of available housing throughout the area on a periodic basis. 4. Special Programs - Examples of special programs include: a, an analysis of local lending and realty practices to identify barriers to equal access and elimi- nate "redlining". b. identify ways to improve fair housing aetivitiea. c. an analysis of the impact affirmative marketing programs would have in the community, Goals which anticipate measurable results and address the objec- tive of expanded housing choices for minorities and women must be included in the stategy. The strategy must Include timetables for implementation and identify the local organization responsible for implementation. (e) Local Entrepreneurial Efforts. (15 goints) The applicable percentage of minority population you should use for this criterion is the percentage of minorities in the applicant's jurisdiction, or in the county, whichever is higher. If the applicable minority population is 5 percent or less, and if the contract dollar value awarded within the past two years to minority-owned and controlled business is at least 5 per- cent of all contracts awarded within the last two years, the applicant will recei•ie points; or, If the applicable minority population is greater than 5 per- cent then the total percentage of-contractual dollar v.otlue awarded to minority-owned and controlled business within the last two years must be equal or greater than the minority 12 percentage of the population. However, irrespective of the percentage of minority population, 20 percent of the contrac- tual dollar value will suffice to receive these points, (d) Local Equal Employment. (10 points) The applicable per- centage of minority permanent full-time employees is greater than the percentage of minorities within the county. If the percentage of minority population in the community itself exceeds that of the county, minority employment must reflect the minority population of the community. J APPENDIX E In case of ties, we will use the following method to determine the winner: a. First Tie Breaker The points received under the Impact factor will be compared. The application having the most points will be funded. If the number of points are _ the same for both applications, the second tie breaker will be used. b. Second Tie Breaker The application recet►ing highest total score under the outstanding performance factors of housing and equal opportunity, e. Third Tie Breaker The application having the highest total score under the needs factor will determine the application to be funded. EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 19, 1982 1:00 P.M. Approval of a Resolution concerning the present City of Denton Landfill Operation adjacent to the City of Crossroads, Texas. 069OM-6 . G A E S 0 L 0 T I 0 N WHEREAS, the City of Denton is in the process of purchasing land for a new landfill; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is now preparing plans and specifications for submitting an application to the Texas Health Department for such new landfill; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVWD BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt SECTION I. The City Council of the City of Denton hereby resolves to remain at the existing landfill site in CrOSSr0ads, Texas only r until the new landfill site is permitted and the City of Denton can commence the use of the new landfill site in Denton, Texas. SECTION II. The City Council resolves that the City of Denton will follow the plan submitted to the Texas Health Department on August 30, 1982 and/or any other adjustments or changes that the Texas Health Department deems necessary for the continued operation cf the landfill in Crossroads, Texas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1982. RICHARD 0. ST9WKff7-o-RXM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTS VICKI WESTLIti00 DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORHt C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS BYs ~ • AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 195 1982 1. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of an Independent Contractors Agreement to C. H. Rodgers in the Amount of $16,350 for Consultant Services for Major Repair of 'turbine #5. 8. Approval of an Independent Contractors Agreement to General Electric Company for $6,310 for Consultant Services for Major Repair of Turbine ~5. I 0465C CITY OF DENTON t' MEMORANDUM r' TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: R, E Nelson, Director of Utilities DATE: October 15, 1962 RE: F5 Turbine overhaul Contract The General Electric turbine is being disassembled in preparation to sending to the Dallas -General Electric shop to have the last stage rotor buckets replaced. The buckets were purchased March 11, 1982, on PO 152321 in the amount of $246,103. A contract to the GE Dallas shop to install the rotor buckets is to be considered by the Council on IU/19/82 in the amount of $43,115, This is in lieu of sending the unit oack to the Lynn, Massachusets, factory which would have cost an additional $21,000 and an extra month of downtime. We have used Mr, Rodgers to act as the consultant supervisor on all our own internal major maintenance work and recommend that we use his services for disassembly and reinstallation of this work. In addition, we feel that we should have Mr, Rogers making daily inspections and supervision, bath on our own maintenance work on the turbine, as well as checking the work being done on the rotor in the Dallas GE shop, It is estimated that he will be working a five (5) day week on this project until December 11, 1982. This consultant is used in lieu of using GE consultants on a fulltime basis while the unit is being overhauled. However, we will need GE specialists and consultants in several special areas for test, supervision and factory data acquisition during the overhaul period. ,The contract to the General Electric Company for r field service engineer is to supervise the removal and cake ready to transport to the service shop and, when the rotor N~pairs are complete, to check the installation while it is being reassembled. It is estimated that the total time required will be between ten and fifteen working days, Note that the use of tor. Rogers as the primary consultant supervisor on our turbine generator overhaul is at about tyro-tPirds of the daily cost of a GE consultant supervisor, Additional extra specialists will need to be used in either case for special test and/or equipment, When we removed the turoine shell, we discovered a broken biaJa on tie 14th stage, plus damage to the 15th stage. We had only scneduIed to replace the blades in the 11th stage. We are presently assessing the cost to replace this broken blade and any other blades that may be damaged, R, E, Nelson, Director of uti tries REN:ger cc: E. a. Tullos, Asst. Director of Utilities Walker Hale, Supt., Electric Production div. file lJ39U PATE 10-11-82 FUND 610 •r Waiker Hale 02-51 AGENCY 008 R~%AAMO~ by yWpjitnpn Earl. TEAMS tr------r~•L ~~~L'' DEL. DATE ~~..~-OAGAN12ATION 0251 ENmQM'A4b or DWartrMnl ApOrogl fe 6:11 NO. OBJECT 8339 General Electric Corporation #510 PO Hx 5821 A/C Dallas Tx 75222 To: CITY OF DENTONSTEAM PLANT ATTN: J.D. Kropf 1701 Spencer Road Denton, ITEM STOCK NUMBER •OESCRIPTION GUAN/UNIT OAIct AMOU 1 Field Service Engineer for Repair & Inspection unit #5 Turbine estimated 15 days 15 $528 7920.00 2 :Mileage & expenses @ 530/day 450.00 DEL1VEAY OATS TOTALS. TAX EXEMPT. EltamaUd to tatl Grdfiution of Funds !,d Only Order tOdtay :.Jtt PurvMd From BilaflCf Oudtatlonlonly RuW QaU _ty Mu4ger Approwl PyrcMtinq Apenil Approval Emfrgency Purrh. Ovate purcn. Conrm+nion BId pu►cArtw OAT& 10-5-82 Puhlo 610 Wa. Hale 02-51 AMUIti ' p~mylt / Est. TERMS-- AGENCY 008 Olvillwn lwoval OEL. GATE ~ 0251 00"finwnl APOtawal ORGANIZATION TO C.H. Rodgers BIO No. OBJECT 8339 7030 Freemont FVC E510 Dallas, Texas 75231 TO: CITY OF DENTON STEAM PLANT 1701 Spencer Paad 'Denton, Tx 76201 ITEM STOCK NUMBER DESCAIPT4ON QUAN/UNIT PAIGE AAAOUN CONSULTANT SERVICE FOR MAJOR REPAIR OF UNIT 05 1 Fifty (50) days at $304.50 50 304.50 15,225 2 Travel expense 90 miles a 5 450 mi. 1,125 DELIVERY OATS TOTALS. TAX EXEMPT. 16,350.0 6tirrutrd to Last Gr:,rust;on Fund, Bid Only Order todsy or Ust Purchsua From ENsnes Ouounons only push psfs tatY MomW Aoorovsf PurcHsunq Agent's ApprovN Ert+srpsneY Purch. Quou PVreh. Cortfirntstlon Ba ourcn,w AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 19, 1982 Joint Meeting of the City of Denton City Council and the Public Utilities Board on Tuesday, October 19, 1982s at 5:30 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered. 5:30 P.M. 1. Receive a report from Freese and Nichols, Inc., on Long Range Water Supply Study for the City of Denton. 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6256-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 19, 1982, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered. 7:00 P.M. 1. Approval of the Minutes of the September 28, 1982, and October 5, 1982, City Council Meetings. 2. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid x9051 Denton Nurth Interchange Concrete Work 2. Bid t9U54 #2 Concentric Cable 3. Bid 19055 Laboratory Analysis for Wastewater 4. Bid 0049-A Repair Storm Damage to Antenna System at Municipal building. 5. Purchase Order ff54b44 to Calvert Motor Company 6. Change Orders: 1. Approval of a Change Order to Freese and Nichols for the Long Range Water Supply Study for the City of Denton. Agenda City of Denton City Council October 19, 1982 Page Two C. Annual Payment 1. Approval of the payment of Annual Membership Dues to the North Central Texas Council of Governments for fiscal period October 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983. 3. Approval of the final plat of th B.F. Price Addition 4. Approval of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application and authorization for Mayor to execute application. 5. Appearance by Bill Holloway regarding the renaming of the Denton Public Library the Emily Fowler Library. b. Public Hearing: A. Z-1540 This is the petition of Fred H. Deal representing Denton 288 Associates, requesting a change of zoning from agricultural (A) to planned development (PO) classification on 112.88 acres of property beginning at the southeast and southwest corners of East McKinney St. and Coop 288 and extending southward approximately 2175 feet along both sides of Loop 288. The following land uses are proposed in the request for planned development (PD) zoning: Single family detached residential 15.8 acres Single family attaShed residential 16.16 acres Multi-family residential 34.85 acres General retail 15.15 acres Greenbelt and/or Open Space 26.41 acres Proposed collector street 4.51 acres 1. Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning from a ricultural (A) to planned development (PD) classification on 112.88 acres beginning at the southeast and southwest corners of E. McKinney and Loop 288, and extending southward approximately 2,175 feet along both sides of Loop 288. (Planning and Zoning Commis;ion recommends approval) 7. Ordinanceg: A. Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing concerning the proposed annexation of approximately 63.89 acres of land located along the east side of Mayhill Road north of the Andrew Corporation; and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing (Z-1541). 8. Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing concerning the proposed annexation of approximately 63.89 acres of land located along the east side of Mayhill Road north of the Andrew Corporation; and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing (Z-1541). Agenda City of Denton City Council October 19, 1982 Page Three C. Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing concerning the proposed annexation of approximately 111.72 acres of land located along either side of FM 1830 beginning approximately 200 feet south or Hobson Lane; and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing (Z-1542) 0. Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing concerning the proposed annexation of approximately 111.72 acres of land located along either side of FM 1830 beginning approximately 200 feet south or Hobson Lane; and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing (Z-1542) E. Adoption of an ordinance approving the 1982 appraisal rolls as approved by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton County Appraisal District. F. Adoption of an ordinance establishing fees for the pick-up and disposal of Animal Carcasses. 8. Resolutions: Frame t and Mayor Mingo. sign a quit claim of resolution the u property at autrizin A. Approval o disposing the in th~z B. Approval of December 11,x1982, Bond resolution Issue designating for i the streets Street Renovations. De 9. Contracts: A. Approval of contract with City of Denton's Parks & Recreation Department and the Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc. B. Approval of contract with City of Denton's Parks & Recreation Department and the Denton Girl's Softball Association C. Approval of contract with City of Denton's Parks & Recreation Department and the Denton Pee Wee Basketball Association D. Approval of contract with City of Denton's Parks & Recreation Department and the Denton Soccer Association d the E. Consider Roads f to Denton our rossapproval Roads f to allw e the t citybetween Cross City City of C Landfill at no charge. Agenda City of Denton City Council October 19, 1982 Page Four 10. Consider selection of a Council Sub-Committee to review Council Districts and set a date for public hearing on proposed revisions. 11. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 0. Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6256-17 V.A.T.S. 12. New Business: This item provides a section in which to suggest items of business for future agendas. 4 U09um 1-4 soP. . yta.~ / October 19, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Receive Report from Freese & Nichols, Inc. on Long Range water Supply Study for the City of Denton. SUMMARY : Freese F, Nichols, Inc., Consulting Engineers, will present the Report on Long Range Water Supply for the City of Denton. The report states that Denton can provide its near term water requirements with its 4.5 to 4.6 million gallon per, day water rights from Lewisville Lake and a raw water contract with Dallas. The report, which reviewed De.nton's requirements for the next fifty years, indicates that Denton's water rights from Lewisville Lake and Ray Roberts Lake will be sufficient to meet Denton's requirements to approximately the year 2003. Thereafter, Denton could continue to purchase raw water from Dallas or develop new water sources. The report indicates three possible future alternative supplies: 1. Diversion of water from Lake Texoma. 2. Participation in development of the New Bonham site on Bois D'Arc Creek northeast of Bonham. 3. Participation in the George Parkhouse Reservoirs project on the Sulphur River near Sulphur Springs. The analysis indicated that the least expensive alternative would be to divert Lake Texoma water. However, there is presently some concern regarding the quality of Texoma water. A summary of the findings of the report are attached. Respectfully, R. t. Nelson Director of Utilities LXHIBI f t ouiamary of Findings i 9. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS R 1 Table 9.1 summarizes the projected probable future water require- I ments for Denton under normal and drouth conditions through the year ! 2030, together with the amounts that Denton may provide to Corinth and I Argyle. It is estimated that the City's water needs will rise by more than 5.6% per year during the current decade and that by 2000 the I~ k average demand will increase to approximately 2.7 times what it was in 1980. Tables 2.1 through 2.10, in Section 2, also show anticipated maximum and minimum projections for the same period of time. In view of i 1 the uncertainty of the forecasts beyond about ten years into the future, 11 it will be important to review and adjust these projections from time to f i I~. time in the light of actual experience, preferably following completion Ii of each federal census. Denton's water rights at Lake Lewisville entitle the City to divert 1 up to 11,000 acre-feet per year (equivalent to an annual average demand of 9.8 MGD) from that source. This is approximately the amount that 1 f! Denton would potentially need in an unusually dry year at the present I time. When Lake Ray Roberts is completed, Denton will have the use of ' 26% of the new storage space, and the increase in dependable yield made available by that portion of the project is estimated at 20.7 KD. 1 i I k! The Ray Roberts project will not be completed for several years. 3 The Corps of Engineers anticipates that construction will require approximately four years, so that deliberate impoundment could begin in { about 1986 (22). Allowing time for capture of a significant volume of l water in the lake, the additional water supply might not be available ~I before 1989 or 1990. By that time, Denton's requirements, including` 9.1 I (I iG I L, Table 9.1 Summary of Projected Probable Future Water Requirements - Annual Average Demand in MG9 - Year Denton Corinth Total I Requirements And Argyle Requirements Requirements Under Normal Conditions: 1980 7.7 .4 8.1 I' 1990 13.3 .7 14.0 ~J 2000 20.6 1.? 21.8 2010 28.7 1.7 30.4 2020 39.4 2.3 41.7 i{ ~i 2030 53.5 3.2 56.7 Requirements Under Drouth Conditions: 1980 8.4 .4 8.8 1990 14.5 .7 15.2 2000 22.4 1.2 23.6 2010 31.0 1.9 32.9 2020 42.5 2.5 45.0 2030 57.7 3.4 61.6 i water for Corinth and Argyle, are predicted to be approximately 14.0 PLO li for normal conditions and 15.2 MGD in drouth conditions. Until the Ray Roberts project is in service, Denton will continue to need a source of supply to supplement the amount that can be obtained from the existing ~i lake Lewisville. Under terms of a contract between Denton and Dallas from 1962 to I i~ 9.2 A 1980, Denton was entitled to purchase up to 13.0 MG9 from the Dallas share of the Lake Lewisville supply, and in return Denton agreed that it !i 1 ! would calculate its own share of the Lewisville water on the basis of 4.8% of the estimated dependable yield of the reservoir rather than the full amount of the water right permit. As a result, Denton paid Dallas for any use from Lake Lewisville in excess of an annual average of 4.5 i MGD, and in exchange Denton was assured of a total average annual supply of as much as 17.5 MGD. Although that contract expired in 1980, the two ! i ` cities have since continued to operate on a similar basis without a I formal agreement, and Denton is presently paying Dallas' established raw water rate for the annual average pumpage in excess of 4.5 MGD. Denton l : and Dallas are negotiating a new contract and expect to finalize the contract in the Fall of 1982. By continuing to purchase water from Dallas, Denton can provide the balance of its requirements between now and the time when yield can be obtained from the Ray Roberts project. 1 Denton's proportional share (4.8%) of the Lewisville yield is now estimated at 4.6 MGD. In normal conditions, this would leave the amount needed from Dallas at around 3.5 MGD as of 1980, increasing to some 9.4 ! MGD in 1990, based on the projected probable needs of Denton, Corinth and Argyle. For drouth conditions, the corresponding purchases from Dallas would range from 4.2 MGD as of 1980 to 10.6 MGD in 1990. Dallas has also proposed that the renewed contract should remain in effect for a period of 30 years. This would have the effect of holding 1 Denton to the agreed limit on its part of the yield of the original Lake Lewisville, which at present would be 4.6 MGD and which might increase slightly in the future as greater return flows of reclaimed wastewater 9.3 i ,r are discharged into streams leading to the lake. After the Ray Roberts yield becomes available, Denton would need to continue to buy water from { Dallas for some time, since the City will probably elect to defer pay- ment of 48% of the projects cost for a period of 10 years. The City's water requirements will grow to equal the combined yield of around 25.3 I MGD from the present Lake Lewisville (4.5 MGD) plus the full Ray Roberts i€ { project (20.7 MGD) in about 2003 ender normal weather conditions and possibly earlier if drouth conditions recur. Denton would need to continuo to purchase supplies from Dallas or to have developed a new source to meet the water requirements in excess of 25.3 MGD. The three most promising alternatives for additional supply after Lake Ray Roberts are (a) diversion of water from Lake Texoma, (b) participation in development of the New Bonham Reservoir site on Bois d'Arc Creek in the Red River Basin, or (c) participation in the George Parkhouse Reservoir project on the Sulphur River. Table 9.2 summarizes the estimated costs for Denton to obtain 40 MGD of new supply from those, sources and use them to meet the projected incremental needs from 2001 through 2030. The costs in the table are based on 1981 price levels, rather than on anticipated future inflated prices, so that they can be interpreted in relationship to Denton's current cost of water. The i Texoma project was examined for three alternative systems of delivery, of which the most economical would be to divert the water into Lake Ray Roberts, then release it into Lake Lewisville and finally pump it from there to the existing filter plant site. The rapidly rising price of energy is causing pipeline distances and total pumping heads to be increasingly important in the economic comparisons. Primarily because S.4 ~I ~i Table 9.2 Com arison of Estimated Costs for Alternative Sources o Raw a ter or the enton Service -Area If - Values in 1981 Dollars - 1i ~System Capital Average Average Cost{ Cost Annual Cost per 1,000 Gal. 1,Q00) ($10000) (Doliar_s) _ a Lake Texoma - pumped directly $38,355 $ 5,302 $ .94 to Denton j' Lake Texoma - diverted to 24,074 31633 .64 Lake Ray Roberts and then ~a pumped to Denton Lake Texoma - diverted to 21,749 31490 .62 E Lake Ray Roberts, released into Lake Lewisville and then pumped to Denton New Bonham Reservoir - diverted 7F,098 99972 1.76 to Lake Ray Roberts and then pumped to Denton George Parkhouse II Reservoir - 77,314 100354 1.83 diverted to Lake Lewisville and then pumped to Denton i' Notes: a. All estimates are based on systems of 40 h1GD capacity. b. The unit costs per thousand gallons represent averages over the 30-year period from 2001 through 2030, based on 1981 price levels without adjustment for future inflation. c. It is assumed that the full yields of the New Bonham and George Parkhouse projects would be developed and that Denton would pay its proportional share for 40 MGD out of the total yield in each case. s l of that factor, 'he more remote sources such as New Bonham Reservoir and 1 George Parkhouse Reservoir are now estimated to be significantly r..are expensive than the Lake Texoma alternative. i The unit costs of supply shown in Table 9.2 are based on the anti- cipated needs of Denton, Corinth and Argyle and represent over-all , 9.5 E! i averages for the 30-year period indicated. They are intended for pur- only and do not reflect differences in unit costs poses of comparison ( from year to year or the possible impact of inflation between now and ii th"i. Nor do they reflect whatever differences there may be between the i costs of supplying water to Denton and the costs associated with service to the customer cities. If the proposed new contract with Dallas is finalized this year and if it is effective for a 30-year term, it would be available as a backup for supplying requirements not met by the Elm Fork sources through the year 2012. Thus, Denton could elect to meet its needs by buying water from Dallas for a period of some 11 years after the requirements are projected to equal Denton's share of the Elm Fork yields without developing another additional source. However, at the end of the con- tract, after which water would no longer be available from Dallas, Denton would be faced with an immediate shortage of approximately 10.0 W50. Unless plans have been made long before to have available a major new source at that time, a shortage of that magnitude could only be met by drawing on the Elm Fork reservoirs in excess of Denton's safe yield amounts. Of the alternatives developed in this study, the most promising option is clearly the diversion of water from lake Texoma to augment the yield of the Elm Fork system. The City of uenton should continue to work on this alternative, with the intention of developing the Texorma diversion supply some time prior to the year 2000. The City should discuss with the Red River Authority of Texas and the Tulsa District of the Corps of Engineers its desire to be included in the Corps evaluation 9.6 77 of future allocation of Lake Texoma water. As a backup for the Lake Texoma source, Denton should also continue to explore possibilities for j i joint development with others of either the New Bonham Reservoir or the George Parkhouse Reservoir. In order to allow sufficient time for 41 permitting, design and construction, it will be desirable to reach a definite decision as to the next source of supply after Lake Ray Roberts by ahout the year 1990. 'Ic r t 'l I I { ~I 9.7 ~1/k , ,~W S City Crnincil Xinutes September 28, 1982 dorK Session of the City of :enton City Council on Tuesday, September 23, 1992, at 5¢00 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the .Municipal BuiLuing. 11 The Council received a report from the Denton County Appraisal ui3trict regarding the budget. Tom Barpool, Carl Degan and Charles Earle were present from the Denton County Appraisal District and the Board to report to the Council on tie 1982-83 budget of the Appraisal District. Mr. Degan gave a brief history of the past year's activities of the diitrict and nanded out C0p£e3 of the new legislative calendar for submission dates of tax rolls. Mr. Earle stated that the district serves 36 separate entities in the County= that they were a new organisation which was still learning. Reappraisals must be done in 4 years, Mr. Earle aso stated that he felt the budget for the district would drop next year. Mr, Degan reported that budget cuts were made last year in salaries but this reanlted in large amounts of overtime and compensatory time expenses for ncn-supervisory personnel, 2. The Council received a report on City/County jointly funded Health uepartment and the Library. Finance Director McNary reported that he had met with Auditor Don Mill regarding an increase the the City's portion of the Health Department funding and that Mr. Hill felt an increase would not be necessary this year. Council Member Stephens suggested that the Council invite Dr. Geral.l Flanagan, the Health Board Medical liaison, to appear before the Council to answer ^iuestions regarding the workings of the Health Huard, Tne Council then convened into Executive Session to discuss Legal Matters, Real I;state, Personnel and Board Appointments, The Council convened into the Special called meeting at 7=00 p.a, in the Council Chambers. PRESENTS Mayor St-?wart, Mayor Pri Tem Stephens, Council Me:7:er3 Barton, Aopkins, Alford, Riddlesperger, and Chew; :ity .Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary. AL ILAto None The Mayor presented a Pr,)elamat£on to the Knights of Columbus !or Knights of Columbus Day on Sunday, October l0, 1982. 1. Consent Agenda The Staff requested Item ..A.3. be removed from the Consent Agenda. Hopkins motion, Alford second to approve the Consent Agenda +ith Item 1.A.3. removed. Motion carried unanimously, Consent Agendar A. 603 and Purchase Jrderss 1. Bid 4 3047 - Service Center Drainage 2. Bid ! 9049 - IBM Hardware Components 3 Vurchase Order } 54642 to General F,le.tric Company - RL4VYED M 2. Resolutions A. The Council wnsidered adoption of a Resolution on the Crime Prevention Program continuation grant. City Manager Hartung stated that the two Resolutions being presented would approve the continuation of the Crime Prevention and Natwtic grants awarded to the Denton Police Department from North Central Texas Council of Governments. The Resolutions would approve the funaing of the grants for the next year. Council Member Stephens asked if the City was obligated to continue. Hartung responded that this was a 6 year commitment. The following Resolution was presented: R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City of Denton to authorize submission of an application to the Texas Criminal Justice Division requesting a Crime Prevention Program; and WHEREAS# Senate dill 127 was passed to enable the Criminal Justice uivision to administer on a statewide level criminal justice progra,a3s and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such funds and is desirous to promote the public safety and wall-being of its City through the reduction of crime; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires to reduce the crime rates NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TdE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, certifies that the City is eligible to receive these funds and has autnoriaed the staff to sub:ait such application to the Texas Criminal JvstLce Division. SECTION II. Tne City Council authorizes and directs the City Manager to represent and act for the City of Denton in dealing with the Criminal Justice Division for the purpose of this program. SECTION III. To indicate the City's desire to participate is this program, a copy of this Resolution will be forwarded to the Texas Criminal Justice Uivi&ion and the North Central Texas Council of Governments. PASSED and APPkOVz;U this tt+i 28th day of September, 1352. RICHARD O. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS A I'TEST I CHARLOPTI al.Li.N, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS APPROVdD AS TO LEGAL FURMi j C. J. CAYLOR, Jk., CITY ATTORNEY CI'IY Ur' OoNT,JN, TeY.s BYt Chew motion, Staprnens second that the Resolution be passed. On roll call vote Barton "aye', Hopkins "aye", Ste$hens 'aye', Alford 'aye', Riddlesperger 'aye', Chew "aye", and Mayo: "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of a Resolution on the Narcotic Enforcement continuation grant. The following Resolution was presented: R E S O L U T 1 0 N WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City of Denton to , authorize submission of as application to the Texas Criminal Justice Division requesting a Narcotic Enforcement Unit= and WHEREAS, Senate sill 127 was passed to enable the Criminal Justice Division to administer on a statewide level criminal justice programs= and W4EREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such funds and is dasirous to promote the public safety and well-baing of its City through the reduction of crimes and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has a need to reduce the use of narcotics and narcotic trafficking; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES)LVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: iECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, certifies than the City is sligible to receive these funds and has authorized the staff to submit such application to the Texas Criminal Justice Division. SECTION It. The City Council authorizes and directs the City Manager to repre3eat and act for the City of Denton in dealing with the Criminal Justice Division for the purpose of this program. SECT109 Ill. 'Iro indicate the City's desire to participate in this program, a copy of this Rearnlution will be forwarded to the Texas Criminal Justice Division an.i the North Central Texas Council of Governments. PASSED and APPROVED this the 23th day of September, IIS2. RICHARD O. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TFXiS ATTLSei CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SLCRETARi ' CITY OF DENTONt TEXAS I APPAQV D AS TO LEGAL FURAj C. J. TAYLOR, JR., ~:ITY ATTORNEY CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS $'t t Chew motion, Stephens second that the Resolution be gassed. On cull call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins Faye", Stephens 'aye , Alford "aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 3. ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an Ordinance on Texas municipal Retirement System ten year vesting. Hartung stated this Ordinance approved a reduction from 20 to 10 year vesting of retirement benefits for City of Denton employees. Tne following Ordinance was presentedi NO. 82-7a AN ORDINANCE AFFECTING PARTICIPATION OF CITY EMPLOYEES IN THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM; GRANTING THE ADDITIONAL RIGHTS, CREDITS AND BENEFITS A-JTHORIZED BY SECTIONS 62.105 AND 61.202 OF TITLE 1108, REVISED CIVIL STATUTES OF TEXAS, 1925, AS AMENDED) PROVIDING THAT SUCH RIGHTS SHALL BE SUPPLEMENTARY TO THOSE HERETOFORE ALLOWED AND THAT ARE IN FORCE ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE= AND PRESCRIBING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. Ridnlesperger motion, Alford second to adopt the Ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye", Riddlespergec "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 4. The Council discussed a proposed health facilities development corporation. Mr. Sam Florance, Jr., First Southwest Company, reported to the council tnis was a new concept similar to the industrial development corporation with an emphasis on private health care facilities, such as physicians offices, laboratories, etc. The City would not be obligated in any way, nor wuuld this corporation be in conflict with the Health Board, Chew motion, Riddlesperger second to recetva more information on the corporation. Motion carried unanimously. 5. The Council considered disposition of City property located along the east side of Carroll Boulevard near its interse.tion +ith Fort North Drive. (The Planning and Zonin; Commission recozzends approval.) Hartung reported this item was placed on the agenda at the rntjuest of Council Member Barton. Council Member Barton stated that he had been approached y a contractor asking for disposition of the property for developaent. Council Member Hopkins raquested to abstain from the vote as h_ owns some adjoining property. Barton motion, Chew second to dispose of the property throu3l the bid process. Motion carried 6 ayes and 1 abstention by Council Member Hopkins. 6. The Council then considered an amendment to the contract between the City of Denton and the federal goverment regarding costs and state maintenance of recreational facilities at Ray Roberts. Utility Uirector Nelson reported to the Council that the original contract required local sponsors to pay 50% of the recreitional facility construction and 1001 of the maintenance. The cities of i Denton and Dallas have negotiated with the Corp of Engineers and t%e State regarding payment of the construction and maintenance. Nelson requested the Coum it to approve the amendment and to allow the City Manager the flOKibility to sign the agreement when it was returned as there might be some wording changes. Cnew motion, ear'.on second to approve the amendment as pcesentei t>ut if changes were made, to have the contract brought back to the Council. 40tion carried unanimously. 7. Tne Council then rea.nsldered the funding for the D.}nino Hall. Council Member Chew stated that he would like to see the Co:~cil honor the verbal agreement made to fund the Domino Hall. Les Holland,- representing the Doa.ino Hall, appeared stating the number of players that used the facility and the cost of janitorial and utility bills. Stephens motion, Cnew second to have the City Staff look at possible utility savings and make recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered the City Manager's recommendati,}*~ of individuals t3 fill vacancies on the Civil Service Commission. Hartung recommended to the Council that Ans. Donna Jeanes be reappointed for another 3 year term on the Civil Service Commission. Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the recommendation. nation carried unanimously, i. There was no official action on Executive Session items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 10. No new items of business foe future agendas were auggeate3. The Council adjourned into Executive Session at 7:49 p.m. RICHARD J.~SrEXART, MAYOR. CHARLUTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY :425C CITY OF DtNTJN CITY COUNCIL PLETINJ MINUTES October 5, 1932 Work Session Of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 5, Iyt>2, at 5:W p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building. Utilities Director, Robert Nelson, introduced Assistant Utilities Director Mr. Haan to the City Council. 1. Dlscusslon of the Proposed Bond Election. Tne Council heard a report from Rick Svehla regarding staff's recommendation far a S4.1 million street bond election at an increased tax cost of 5: per s1W evaluation. Svehla further stated that this could be extended over a five year period. Tne proposal was discussed by the Council. It was felt that the street bond election should include the C.I.P. City Manager, Hartun stated that the C.I.P. would not affect the rate of the tax increase. Additionally, it was felt by the Council that the street bond election would be strengthened by the inclusion of the C.I.P. Crew suggested that the bond election be based on a meaningful or"ram even if "we go up to He further stated that he feels the reeds of the public nast be met. Barton suggested that the bond election be held for the total number of dollars needed regardless of whether or not the increase would be higher than the estimated bit. he further stated that the City needs to do all the work that is needed, not lust a part of it. The increase beyond the 52 would allow for this. Svehla asked for clarification from the Council regarding their direction as to whether or not the bond election should be for more than a 5d increase. Mayor Stewart asked for P motion to increase the tax increase to cover "the S7 million list" of street and drainage repairs. Chew motioned that a resolution be presented detailing the bond election proposal to cover "tne $7 million list". Garton seconded. The mdtaion passed unanimously. Tne Council convened into Executive Session to discuss Legal Matters, Real Estate, Personnel and Board Appointments. Tne Council convened Into the Regular Called Meeting at 7:CQ P,%,'. In the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro Tem Stephens, Council Members Barton, Hopkins, Alford, niddlesperger, and Chew; City Manager, Assistant City Attorney, Deputy City Secretary. ABSENT: None 1. Tne Council considered the approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of September 14, 1942, and the Regular Meeting of September 21, 1y02, iupxins notioned that the Minutes be approved as presented. Alford seconded the motion. Motion carried unanUnously. 4. Consent ,Benda: Mayor asked for any deletions on the Consent Agenda, Hopkins wed Purcnasing Agent, John Marshal) to respond to Item PA-1. Hopkins asKeu from what account these repairs were to be paid. He further asKed wnether ur not these repairs were done oo an anrwil contract basis. 1 c City of Denton City Council ,leeting minutes Octooer o, 1y82 Paye Two Harsnall responded that the repairs were indeed on an annual contractual basis. He reported that the cost for said repairs was less by doing them on these termi rather than sending each needed repair ;it on a separate bid. In responding to the question regarding budgetary source for repairs, Marshall stated that the Utility Distribution Account x83.39 is the account charged for these repairs. Hopkins motioned to approve the consent agenda as it was presented. Barton seconded the motion. The approval of the consent agenda was carried unanimously. A. bids and Purchase Orders; 1. Bid r 9048 - Transformer Repairs e. Purchase Order a 54329 to J&S Equipment Service 8. Final Plats: , 1. Approval of the Final Plat of Lot IOR, Block II, owsley Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approvll.) 2. Approval of the Final Plat of the Jupiter Industrial Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Comm I ssinn recommends approval.) C. Change Orders: 1. Consider Change Order rl - Contract A Cullum Construction Company. (The Puo11c Utility Board recommends approval.) 2. Consider Change Order rl - Contract C Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval.) 3. Consider Change Order r2 - Contract A Cullum Construction Company. (The Public Utility Board recd rends approval.) The Mayor presented a Proclamation to representatives from the DisibleJ American Yeteran's Association declaring the month of October, as D.A.Y. Handicapped Awareness Month. Mayor asRed Jeff ,Meyer for a report regarding the City's participation regarding acquiring handicapped stickers for license plates. Meyer responded by stating that the City is currently working on obtaining these stickers, but, "as yet we do not have them". d. Tne Council received a report from Stephan aorman regarding changing the closing times for local clubs from i2:W Midnight to 2;00 A.N. on Thursday, Friday ano Saturday, as recomnendeJ by the Denton Area Service Enterprise Co inittee. mr. Goraan stated that the DASEC's naJor concerns regarding the oariier closing times are: 1. Tne private club industry is losing 26a of its revenue; e. the earlier ciasing times has caised a 771 meetly man hour loss in addition to 19 terminations; 3. The club goers are taking their aisiness to Dallas. As a result of this, the local police deparbnent has seen an increase in the numcee of D'ai's ~fro,a 651 to 77i); 4. grime in private clubs has increased. Tn_ earlier clL~sing change Ali to nopefill, result in a cecrease. However, the nunbar of calls to tint siA most popular Clubs has increased. Po11ce calls within one block of the rrnst poiular clubs has also Increased. Police are getting more cells for Jisturoa ices, fight; and drunkenness Citywlde by an increase of 34%. City of Denton City Council Meeting Minutes 0:tober i, 1984 Page Three b. Tne UiSEC noes rat feel the public was well informed about the issues when toey were asked to vote. Aidolesperger asked Gorman if he felt that the 26% decrease in consumption was what was consumed between the ors of 12:00 Midnight and 2:00 A.M. Gorman responded that he was not saying that. RatH:r, he stated that the crinking hcs been moved to the streets and/or Dalias. Aiddlesperger told Gorman that the City Council would not ordinarily reverse the decision of the people. Further, he stated that to vote on this at the time of this meeting would "boa the Council in". Riddlesperger questioned Gorman about his statement of wanting the longer hours on only Thursday. Friday and Saturday nights. Gorman stated that these are the three busiest nights of the week. Gorman closed his appearance by inviting the Council to assign a staff rember to the task of researcning the sotto-economical issues relating to the earlier vs, later club closings. a. The Council received a report from Jeffrey Hale, 216 Fry Street, Denton, Texas, regarding a Petition to the City Council Regarding the Location of the Crisis Center. Mr. Hate stated that was designated by a group of petitioners to appear before the Council and rtgjest the relocation of the Crisis Center to another area of the City. He stated that the residents in the neighborhood are fearful for tneir sa-ety and security of their property. Further, he requested that the Caunctl make him aware of their decision regarding his request. Mr. Hale stated that there have been two burglaries to residents in the neighborhood, i.e., sisters allson and Aldrich, six reeks ago. City Manager, Hartung stated that he had asked the Police Chief for any informatiat regarding any criminal activity regarding residents of the Crisis Center, and none was reported. RiddlesperNr asked Hale if tie knew how much money has been invested into the Crisis Center. rile stated that he did not have that informatiot, however he knew that that particular location has KAwsed at least three different activities. He stated that the firit phase: was a suicide/druy crisis center which lasted for about five years, tnen the second phase folded after a short period and reopened as a place for adolescents and runaways. Hoykins asked if there was anyone who might be able to answer some questions auaut the activi.'•es of the center. Hate asked the Council for information regarding their decision, and asked Wow tie would be notified. Tne Mayor stated that n<i decision would be made until more infurmation hai peen obtained. City Managers Harting su}jested to the Mayor that they appeal to the audience to see if someone front the Crisis Center was available for torments. Mayor asked' if tnere was a Crisis Center representative in the audience. ;As. Panela VanEmcerg, Assistant Director of the Crisis Center, responded to tik, Mayor's request. She asked Riddlesperger to restate h1; question. Rlddlesperjer asked "now much raoney has bean Invested in tre Crisis Center". ialiEmuerj states that sne Jid nut have that information reafily available at this time. dowever, she would be w1111-tg to provide this at a later tine. She reported that at tnis tine the Center is an emergency shelter for 13 near old to 17 yea' old youths w+o have been soused and'/dr turned ou' of their nu nes . Ridulesperger oared if the .:niidren were supervised. W Emberg stated that the ciildren are supervised constantly except for all out one half hour per day. They are allowed this tine W go away from the center to the :tare, etc. witho-it supervision. t city of Denton City Council Meeting Minutes October b, 193: Page Four YanEmoerg further stated tnat regarding the burglary Incident, the person in question is not associated with the Crisis Center. She further stated that the roman who was GurglarizeJ was ;.sable to give a positive Wt+rtificatiun of the perpetrator. She stated further that the incident has not been closed. Barton asked for an report to the Council at the next Council Meeting giving details of the budget, and activities of the Crisis Center. YanEmoerg stated that she would be willing to appear before the Council on the 12th of October. City Manager, Hartung asked ManEmberg to explain the routine interactions between the Crisis Center and the Police Department. YanEmoerg stated that the Crisis Center always reports any runaways to the Police Department even if they are missing for a short while. This results in the Police Department being in a position to keep abreast of any potential problems. Hopkins asked YanEmberg what six felt the success rate at the Center was. YanEmoerg stated that ;he feels that the Cosanunity has chosen to ignore the problems of the abuses drild. The Center has seen residents go on to find success and have had some return for further counseling. Mayor, asked for a staff report from Jeff Meyer regarding funding through the Haman Resource Board. Meyer reported that the Crisis Center appears before the board every year requesting funding. However, he further stated that they have always been turned down. In responding to the zoning issue. Meyer stated that the center is legally toned. Further, he stated that this type of an operation can be legally located in many residential areas througnout the City. Mayor asked if the Crisis Center is meeting the criteria of the zoning ordinance now in existence. Meyer responded that the Center is indeed meeting all of the zoning regulations as specified by the current ordinance in force. o. Resolutions: A. The Council considered a resolution leasing City Property Located on the Northeast Corner of Dallas Drive and Willow Springs, to Coors-Golden Oistributing Company to Accorniodate a Recycling Center. The following resolutial was pre~.r,ted: R E S 0 L U T I U N BE 11 RESOLYEU BY THE CITE COU'i:lt OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS: Tne Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby authorized and directed to execute on benatf of the City of Denton, Texas, a Lease Agreement between the City of Denton and Coors-Golden Distributing Company property located on the northeast corner of Dsllas Urive and willow Springs to acconngdate a recycling center. PASSED olio A?PRUYEJ this the Sth day of October, 13:12. RICiARD 0. STEWART, M;YOR CITY Uf DEMON, TEXAS ATTEST: . CHHRLUTTE ALLEN, ECRETnRf CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS APPROVED AS TU LtGAL FORM: C. J. inYLOA, JR., U1Tf ATIOR,iEY CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS dY: 1 City of Denton City Council Meeting Minutes Octooer 5, IVJZ Page Five David Ellison spoke for the staff. Chew motion, Barton second that the Resolution be passed. On roll call vote Barton 'aye', Hopkins 'aye", Stephens, 'aye", Alford, "aye", Riddlesperger, 'aye', Chew, "aye', and Mayor Stewart, "aye•. Notion carried unanimously. b. The Council considered approving a Contract with Black and Veatch, Consulting Engineers, for Miscellaneous En9lneering Services for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Licensing Activities on Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville Hydroelectric Units. (The Putlic Utility Board recommends approval.) Boo Nelson spoke for the staff. Nelson reported that this contract has been recommended for approval by the PuDlic Utility Board. Cher motioned to approve the contract. Alford seconded the motion. The motioned carried unanimously. 7. The Council considered the approval of a Contract with Freese and Nichols for Engineering Evaluation of Location and Schedule for 'dater Treatment Plant Expansion. (The PuDlic Utility Board recommends approval.) BOD Nelson spoke for staff. I Nelson reported that tiat It will be necessary to add to the water plant in Tutu-e years. He further stated that the major concern at this time was the location of the facility. Nelson reported that the contract with Freese and Nichols would not exceed Sail,CwU. ropkins questioned Nelson regarding the possible future sale of water to adjacent communities. Nelson reported that this was not the intent of the City at this time. Hartung, stated that as the City of Denton approaches other cities for discussion, it Is not to enlist in selling them water, but rather to discuss their needs and possible supply from Dallas. Riddlesperger motioned that the contract be accepted. Cheer seconded the motion. The motion was carried unanimously. 3. The Council considered Environmental Protection Agency Grant Arend,oent fo Phase ill of the Industrial Pretreatment Program. (The Puoiic Utility Board recommends approval.) Bob Nelson spore for staff. Nelson stated that the City is ready to hove into Phrsa Ill of the progran. Tire cost of tnis contract is S43,03.uu less the EPA's .'.care of $3u,509.W- Stephens nuti.)neo that tre contract be approved. Chew seconded the motion. Tne motion to approve the contract was approved unar•1m-4sly. d. Official Acticn of Executive Session Itims: A. Legal tatters 1. The Council :onsiderad aauptlon of a Resolution on th. formal action on Law Suit Settlement ahJ Land Purchase City of Denton City Council Meeting Minutes October 5, 1992 Page Six The following Resolution was presented: RE50LUT101 WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas is the defendant in a certain Cause )f Action No. 81-6769-9 styled Felix W. Callahan, et al v. City of Denton, Texas in the 15dth Judicial District Court said Cause of Action Involving the title to a 17.93 acre tract of land described in Volume 463, Page 26J of the Deed Records of Denton County, leens and the title to a roadway easement descrioed in Volume 412, Page 263 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore instructed and authortzed the City Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings to acquire the fee simple title to said 17.93 acres of land and the fee simple title to said roadway easement; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found no determined that it would be in the oest Interest of the City of Denton to acquire approximately 15 acres of lard owned by the Plaintiffs in the above styled and numbered cause situated around and adjacent to the 11.93 acre tract of land; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that it would be In the best interest of the City of Denton to acquire said approximate 75 acre tract of land by the institution of condemnation proceedings against Felix W. Callahan, et al to squire the fee simple title to said 75 acre tract of land; NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The City Attorney be, and ne is nereby authorized and directed, to enter into an agreed judgment in Cause No. 81-6739-6 styled Felix W. Callahan, tt ai v. City of Denton, Texas in the 153th Judicial District Court of Denton County, Texas wherein the fee simple title to said 17.93 acres of land Is awarded to tine City of Denton, Texas and to further enter into an agreed judgment and/or contract of sale from Felix J. Callahan, Lotto E. Callahan Ann C. Stark, Robert W. Callihan and James E. Callihan to acquire the additional 7:1 acres of land (approximately) for a total consideration and cost to the City of D:ntan of Four Hundred Thousand dollars (5400,DU0.00) in settlement of Cause No. 81-6739-8 and in full payment for said additional 15 acres of land, the said 7y acres to be conveyed free and clear of all liens, and the judgment condemning the 11.93 acres in fee simple title free and clear of any and all restrictions and covenants herein abovr, set out in Volume 463, Page 260 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas. SECTION II. As further consideration for tiie conveyance of the above described additional property, the City of Denton hereby agrees to construct across Pecan Creek a 10W water darn in the approximate cost of Thirty-Three Thousand Crollars (a33,000.0D). SECTION III. Tnis resolution shall Decome effective Lmnediately from and after its pate of passage. PASSE) AND APPROVED this the day of , 1982. RICHARD O. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: L L EALli' CITY A CITY OF DE'ITON, TEXAS • APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORT: C. J. TAYLUR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY Uf DENTCA, SEAAS ay: _ city of Denton city council Meeting Minutes .Jctooer -J, I d52 Page Seven Hopkins motioned, chew seconded that the resolution be passed, on roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye"t Alford "aye", Risdlesperger "aye", Cnew "aye", Mayor Stewart "aye", the motion paged ur.animousty. B. Real Estate 1. Forial Action on Land Purchase The following Resolution was presented: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. a The Mayor 1s hereby, lthorlzed and directed to execute on behalfof the City of Denton, Texas t- followin- real estate sales contracts; 1. Contract of Sale between the city of Denton and Earl 1. Edwards and wife, Ruth Edwards for One Hundred Eighty. Seven Thousand Dollars (SIB7,000.00) for 116.241 acres of land; 2. Contract of Sale Detween the City of Denton and Earl I. Edwards and wife, Ruth Edwards for Two Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars (;220,000.00) for four houses and 2.6122 acres of land; 3. Contract of Sale between the City of Denton, Texas and Robert E. Edwards and wife, Elaine Edwards for Fifty- Two Thousand Dollars (s52 MU.00) for one house and J.467 acres of land. 4. Contract of Sale between the City of Denton, Tpcas and William Marren Edwards and wife, Pamela J. Edwards for Sixt; T,.ousana Dollars J$6O,000.OO) for one house and 0.501 acr.. of land. Contract of Sale between the City of Denton, Texas and Robert E. Edwards and wife, Elaine Edwards and dilliam Warren Edwards and wife, Pamela J. Edwards for One Hundred Forty-One Thousand Dollars (3141,000.00) for fou houses an4 1.924 acres of land. e. Contract of Sa'e between Richard Clark Shelton and wife, Myrtle Elitaoeth Shelton for Forty Thousand Oollars ($40,00.00) for one house and 0.416 acres of land. A copy of each of said contracts being attached hereto and made a part nereof for all purposes. SECTION 11. Tnis resolution shall become effective from and after its date of passa}e. PA`SED AND APPROVED Lois the Y~ day ofI9A2. CN~IRDJO. i'eGt4T, !i,tY~R CItY OF OFNTON, TEXAS ATTESF: CHAALO E ALLEN, 1:111' RE A7Y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED Al TO LEuAL FOP.A: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY JF DENTOIi, TEA.tii BY: _ C. Personnel 0. Board Applistnpnts 1 City of yenton City Council Meeting Minutes October 5, 19<1 page Eight Hopkins motionea, Chew secondci that the resolution be passed, on roll call vote $arton "aye", Ho W ns "aye", Stephens "aye% Alford "aye% Riddlesperger "afe", Cher "aye", az,or Stewart "aye", the motion passed uhaninuusly. W. New Business: The following Items were requested by Council Members for future agendas: Barton wants a report on the status of the Crisis Center budget, income, and activities. Hopkins initiate annexation proceedings for the newly purchased property for the sanitary landfill site (Edwards 6 Callahan properties) Alford Resolution recognizing "Hospice Week" The Cuuncii adjuourned into Executive Session at 8:27 P.M. c ar , tewart, Ttayar OW West, ng, Deputy a ty FKratary Jud'aM CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 1982 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 4 Consent Agenda s SUBJECT: Bid 9 9051 Denton North Interchange Concrete Work SUMMARY: This bid is for the concrete foundgtion work for the new Denton North Interchange with TMPA. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE OF Fi1NDS: Electric Metering and Substations work order number 1439. RECOMMENDATIONS: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest and best bidder meeting specifications. Graco Construction Company. They have bid a total price of $10,798.00. Fort Dallton Company has offered a lower price, however, they have not included time, materials and equipment to deal with rock which obviously will have to be delt with. EXHIBITS: abL-4; t. SUBMITTED BY: = Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent 3I1~ x__9051 I I BID TITLE Denton North Interchange Concrete Work OPENED 1017182 Fort Craco Floyd Dallton Co. Const. Co. Glenn ACCOUNT 0 Smith QTY• ITE1.1 DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR - I Concrete Work 91580.00 10,798.00 130200.00 I inRM,Clau a i i l CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 1982 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid 0 9054 #2 Concentric Cable SUMMARY: This bid is for the replacement of 02 15KV under- ground electric distribution power cable in Warehouse stock. This material is maintdined in stock for use by the Electric Distribution Department in the maintenance and construction of the underground electrical distribution system. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE Of FUNDS: Warehouse Working Capital 4 710-004-0598-8708. RECO%,M,r'DATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, WESCO to the amount of $597.00 per 1,000 feet, FOB Denton. EnTBITS: T bullaattio eet. SU&41TTED BY: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent BID 9Q54 BID TITLE 02 15KV Concentric Cable OPENED WESCO Graybar Cummins Priester Dealers Supply Supply Electric ACCOUNT 0 710-004-0598-8708 OT -Y,-- DESCR PTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR 1. 5M' 15KV Concentric Cable 597.00/m 690,00/m 647.00/m 712.00/m 640.32 i FOB Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton Delivery Stock Stock Stock Stock Stock Terms Net Net Nat Net Net PA-3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Summary Sheet Meeting Date: October 19, 1982 Agenda Item 0: Subject: Bid 09055 Laboratory Analysis for Wastewater Summary: ' This bid is for the testing and analyzing of the various pollutants that the City's industrial discharge into the sewer plant and then to analyze the concentration of these at the sewer plant. This is in conjunction with an accepted amendment to the original EPA Grant and received in Sept. 1981. This bid was sent out to three vendors and received two proposals. Action Required: Approval by Council Source of Funds: 25% City Bond Fund and 75% EPA Funding Recommendation: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder TRAC Laboratories, Inc. of Denton for the total of $19,029.00, complete. Exhibit: Tabulation sheet Submitted By:~ -ff) 1fll~:%lC.L-j ohn J. M rs all, C.P.M LPurchasing Agent BID 1 9055 BID Laboratory Analysis of Wastewater OPEN October 14, 1982 North Stir TRAC Laborato ies Laborato ies ACCOUNT i 620-008-0480-8523-9976 Inc. Inc. QTY. ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENMDR 1. 12 Industrial sites 13 680.0 91933.00 2. 11 Wastewater Treatment 12,540.0 9,096.00 Total: 269220.00 19,029.00 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Summary Sheet Meeting Date: October 19, 1982 Agenda Item Subject: Purchase Order #54644 Summary: This Purchase Order iv for the emergency repair of our unit 02004 in the Solid Waste Dept. This is a Peterbilt with the roll off fre:ae that picks up the big containers placed at large business and industries. This Purchase Order is for the complete repair and overhaul of the brakes and transmission for a total outside repair of $3,059.54. Action Required: Approval by Council Source of Funds: Vehicle Maintenance 720-002-0599-8710 than to budgeted account 100-002-0802-8342 Recommendation: We recommend this Purchase Order for the needed emergency repair be approved to Calvert Motor Co. for the total of $3,059.54. Exhibits: Invoice #4467 Purchase Order #54644 Submitted By: -z rc_'! John J. es hall, C.P.M. /Purchasing Agent CITYOF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 54644 215 E, McKinney (Denton, Texas 76201 8171668.8311 DOW Metro 267-0042 OATS 8-24-82 610 No. vewoe NO. It"" W.O. NO. MmItT ACCT. NO. 05-98-87-10 Calvert Motor Co. sau To: CITY OF DENTON Vehicle Haut. SHOW P.O.NO.ON ALL SHIPMENTS, OELIVERY TICKETS, INVOICES ETC.SEND INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE,THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS IS EXEMPT FROM SALES TAX AS PER HOUSE BILL #20. THE CITY OF DENTON IS PROHIBITED FROM PAYING FOR MERCHANDISE BEFORE IT IS RECEIVED. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE F.O.B., CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS. ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION GUAN./UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Rig 4 2004 Repair brakes and repair transmission as per attached invoice 0 4467 Lot $3,059.54 Direct All Inquiries TO: CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT. John J. Marshall, C.P.M., Purchasing Agent Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M., Asst. Purchasing Agent 1 r y L ~ 1 ! .''S. ;i' SP ~:v 1 F ~ ♦ ~ti~} a f X ~1 '+r 1 ! { r It°~ .ln ! t .1 ':A ~ F}'. /1.;4 ' v 15 .~''I. " IP ,r'•7'4 .j ~l. fi r y„- _ _ _ -°'r` 5 • • / ~ r!II ~r~Y ! • 1t(.. r ` r,t i t 1% C , ~ ! ! t ~ i. 1K1N~ ,.ir4}r .4 1--• ~h R • ~~~lll f 1'r .1 r, ~rr. .f 1. ~.r.f r•~y'fr,, .f , `43h1r~4y, t{; Ir AA~ .rr" 5 ; ~'•~''I J ~i r /~'r..• ,rip, . ' 1r ym 1` s ~A~- ;Mi1~ M.. 4 51 . Y r o + +?e ` ^ DA ai9i` q, Ham. 1. 1 ♦ CITY f v 7 ~dl T t`Sti fS /`tl l~.f';.• •t , ''b, . ~t , rte,lrr all 4 I TU 82 f• t .,r+ ;`»Y / 'r/ i' .S E,fO ~~-~ri ~'r '`w Pill lDI r, r0-"1*'!JO t ~•;ji ;4-; or df ! Y •r±Y 1. ' ,r a rij .q'1 ; ♦ ' , ' . i 1 t Art r "l K T` SlR1A1 NUlMER 4.. ° ppwETim ! . t t} 7 u►' _ t S , ~1, lay Ao"i "JIB \k ,'.s {i.i?~ .y'frc "'i+ ( /rC r , - .t. ra "S -ra .Y ( R • + a, w` • ~ ~ • 1 t , ~ ,T 1' ~ " ` 1 r!~~ '~+~'~•M~ ~0,•K~ 't /~f/i J~•~/ ~ ~ ~i Trl P Id• fif, a l • 1 CALVE Rot MOTOR COMPANY onb 3 t'",P,,U, Box 1005 DENTON; TEXAS ' 304 E.tymnl0' f 6 rr f ! 9 % 3d roll, 12ALL'ACCOVNTS PAYABU-0 0ENTON, GENtON 000NtY„TE1J►S, ',•j i~ q 4 y v • v t r 1111ily lei fto" 76 6'1 }I f ! ' ♦+r ti \ ' t y 1 ~ ' i ' 1 i"~!1~L V : i ',7f/~F- / ' 1 ~,~6rv,~ ~~`Fi lA1« ~+'L' a ' e. ~ X31, 4~ 1 ~.V f L t z t T. Tl ( i r'1 >r,,':, f",•~i ~py6 . .l,+'.~~ .!':.r,.,L s, a t'~`" r~l . F ~'t'f' i•f' '.,fla1~ LP:~ `~1 M7~ 1•.f •I c. y, r~.! r S 1 r!- ,r ~r't + 'a.,.1 S.'` r 1 `>P r'l.' ~ rr P"t n f' ♦ •Y' ~t t, •'i s r,l 1 . w r 1'' t, , ~ ,r a ~J,'t '4• n♦' /',I.,Fi, r~.. •~J:~ ;r ..~Z`+ r«~` f.d j.h '•r5 r tic r 1 if4 la 1~3'{ '~f~ ! ~!\r q'~-4 rt h'!', '~r ~',~'+Y~';!.' i'±\,~ ,.4'i! ~hl~ :~t,~ s t F ~5 ' . 'w""~~ \,1 tt f, r)'!dit ill ! 1P~'-.~.L `'<`lt i-• :5~ is ~•d~ .;AF ww,l., t..~.5 II' '~dr ;.y. ^r' t Y {a is •♦1. SS'~,~1'} 1 f .fit ll'. J'~. 4 l•♦~, ~ , af( a ~ . 4 -i 1TlS' ~ t~ t~•, i .F.; t'r, ~r '4,'_'i , r <t '~~4a iKi 1 1'a 7:jy r 4 f \ , L t ! . Y 4'r 1 t . ~y ,ati l~~ l ~ ~ L}~" ~'s•,t t `.~~p ' r n~• y~ Y t 1' ys5 ,'j { 1 t fi :~rr ~ ~ 4 ~ ~1 r' ' t .tA. taVf' IT~ } {a~rir ~ r ~fi}f ,r,',~'.' `•~'t< r .7 - ~\l joi, )4 t Y»'• f r'f 1!1 q?~tY rj~M1' !i). t", bya-,, ASS dir.-r.M • yl ! . ' r+ 'y + j k l~:a 1'w + .l.. * r~•i '.a 5 • l k .w i I~ri 1r'. 1,; (L a. t r N ~,l 1.' L; ~ r + . i:,' MY~{'t r. 4{r,P~.a. 1111" i:'~ a1 ~•1,rn : ♦ . ?~rf T~.tl~, eKl'~. 7~1 n {-1 •Y+'{ t «h.1 11'~'. (a_' 15 .~.~4 1,\t . ',`4 r/ !f \ ~•aa. 1 fir ,+1'9 IIV ff 1 t I .qC^ •Y ; +1 \ K'~ 4+ t f.\ ra 1~~ ,~i Y. • r ti/V r" ~ .I ;y, .i~ ~ r , ti ~1 '~'1 rf l+ \`i. r'} 3 -Y f i 'i,f 1 ,1 1 .~,w v. ~,k ,i L r i. 9.' t i + . `{`r'{y! 14, 5 , k + {'•!.j J F a ^r I 5 ♦a i of 4 ! :P 'j 4 4'.' p ly'i t! L 't !i; , a' , ^•r T ~ + :T, j l >J . ✓ «J t'S, / y a ¢ J~ "d jl^ f. ( ♦ \ ! L4 r t ,'d , + fq -t. 7 a ry , (o a. M1 } pr nl , 1'.' ' 1 1, e.. r 1j. 16S.M1 , A I1 nY }M ,ia t r n11t •f' •:.'+i «y+ •'1' 1 y'~• 44• •Y . ti ' r ' i ' ( 1., , r., ) `.Ly ' ; .'y~ Net Re"obll For l•u br Don+ope fe CeP• or Arlicl•1 tell In Cs/a in Ce••o) t T ( k•, tMff at An Ocher Couw !e nd Oat Cenlrel, OYAt tAWI1 M1 } /i1 •f L ! ! 1 r t r' 4 C ~r ' . "R w' 1 l + . 1 t ^f, f hN•b/ ON~leri!• 04 ebe4e 1q1. a,.'1 • If ylenl IIOY r 1aM • if re(~ le be doom WWei~pNNleli 4041 y~M TMN•N^ Tovu r uTS ay JI 4. Ae! { ~'F•.. wn v ' i \ xt! 1 : L t ,'y r t`{ < i k~t 7t ,'x'r , Np ,ONfehh~t••E~ nk M •t• • b1 M iMH tN~ IhrvtlyN wM i o !!}.4A ry L~ 's• ~1'" r' k'f" f r,x,. 'erlyyM•li`.pwp 11 Ilrtd•lAOM"A YI of 1 '^^S!~ ~ .ai`,. lAx •'~'J(.,."' . AtlfI10A12l~~RY~ F ' o i 4"+,+T. $r ;1'r.;; j' ,Ai p 'e ' .1• . t\~^it"r' ';,~yt % ;~~$~'~{J,, i. ell Dal t ! / 1 a T1 r ♦ October 19, 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Consider Change order and Final Payment to Freese and Nichols, Inc., for Long Range Water Supply itudy for the City of Denton. SUMMARY: As the work progressed on the Long Range Water Supply Study, the analysis of the various alternatives became more complex than first contemplated. Freese and Nichols initially estimated the cost of the study to be $20,000 and the Staff negotiated a price of $15,ODU. The contract was based on standard per diem professional service rates. Un April 29, 1982, Freese and Nichols presented the draft report of the study to the Public Utilities Board , and at that time, .ne Public Utiities Board recommended approval of increasing the contract amount from $15,000 to $26,000 to conduct the necessary analysis to be certain that all possible alternatives were explored. FISCAL SUMMARY: Contract $150000 Change Order $11LOOU TUTAL $20,000 Source of funds: Water/Wastewater Administration Special Services Account U4-50-85-02 Budgeted $75,000 Encumbered for Water Plant Study $35~00U Unemcumbered Balance $40,ODU $14,25U from the 1981-82 budget has been paid on the Long Range Water Supply Study. ACTIUN REQUIRED: Consider approval of sub je..t change order and approval of final payment. AL'tERNA1'1 VhS: A. Change Urder 1. Approve change order. 2. Modify amount of change order. 3. Disapprove change order. 1327U S. Approval or disapproval of final payment. R ECUMMENDAT ION ; The Public Utilities Board and Staff recommends approval of the change order. The study is complete and the Staff recommends final payment. Respectfully$ R.E. Nelson Uirector of Utilities 1317U G..oi too rtooled 10 .n P. 0. Drawer COO INVOICE NO. 5766 Arlington, Teas 76011 PROJECT ACCOUNT SUSSIOIARY 0000 1413 010720 DATE ' 10 - Q1- 82 I G. Chris Hartung, City Manager City of Denton 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 I L J Annual Membership Dues to the North Central Texas Council of Governments for fiscal period October 1, 1982, through September 30, 1983. Based upon estimated 1982 population of 51,350 computed at AMOUNT DUE 5610: $ 50135.00 NCTCOG's Annual Dues structure is as follows: Counties $ .01 Cities: Under 2,000 population 100.00 Between 2,000 and 5,000 200,00 Over 5,000 population Collin, Dallas, Denton b Tarrant Counties .10 per capita Non-Metro Counties A per capita Independent School Districts 100.00 Special Districts 100.00 For "uumm, contact the Department d Admnwabon (811) 640.33U1 ORIGINAL 3 CITY COUNCIL ACENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 19, 1982 Subject: Approval of the final plat of the B.F. Price Addition. Summary: This is a proposed one lot subdivision of a 1.3 acre tract located adjacent and south of Riney Road, approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of Bonnie Brae and Riney Road. The proposed devel- opment is single family residential which is permitted in an agricultural (A) zoning district if located on a lot or tract at least one (1) acre in size. The subject property has access to Riney Road which is an unimproved 40' street. Riney Road has never been dedicated for public use, but it is the legal depart- ments opinion that it is a public road by implication, due to the fact that it has been used by the public for over 40 years. The petitioners have dedicated 10 feet of property along the front of their property for future street widening, but they do not own property to the center line of Riney Road, and consequently, cannot dedicate 30' of right-of-way in accordance with the standard requirement for collector streets. The perimeter street paving ordinance and the master drainage plan obligate the petitioners to provide for improvements to Riney Road and installation of 42 ,inches R.C.P. storm drain across the front of this property. The ordinance further provides that the City Council may waive these requirements if residential development is proposed on three (3) lots or fewer, or three (3) acres or less. This final plat is a can- didate for a waiver, and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the City Council Agenda October 19, 1982 Page 2 street improvement and drainage i,equire- ments be waived by a vote of 7-0. If the City Council is not inclined to grant a waiver of the aforementioned requirements, the developers will be obligated to pro- vide for the street and drainage improve- ments and submit adequate engineering plans for the road and drainage. There is a substantial amount of undevel- oped agricultural (A) property in the area along Riney Road and it is anticipated that other individuals will be making sim- ilar requests for waivers as future subdi- visions and developments are proposed. Developers and area property owners rou- tinely share in the cost of street im- provements so that this fiscal responsi- bility is not transferred to the general public at some point in the future. A forty (40) foot front yard setback that conforms to zoning ordinance requirements is shown on the plat. City of Denton water and sewer service is not available. The City-County Health Department has approved a septic and well system for this site. The Fire Chief has emphatically advised the developers that no City of Denton fire protection can be provided due to the absence of fire hydrants. Electri- cal service will be provided by the Co-op. Action Required: Approval or disapproval of the final plat. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mended approval of the raquest for a waiver of the perimeter street paving and master drainage requirements, and subse- quent approval of the final plat, at its meeting of September 29, 19829 by a vote of 7-0. Alternatives: 1. Approve the final plat with the stip- ulation the perimeter street paving End master drainage requirements be waived. City Council Agenda October 190 1982 P=ge 3 2. Deny request for waiver and require developers to provide for necessary street and drainage improvements. (Proper consequent action would be denial of the final plat if this alternative is chosen.) Exhibits: 1. Reduced plat 2. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of September 29, 1982 atil t- ~ j David Ellison Development Review Planner If (74 r.NOtiYe. ~ w [ a RINEY ROAD EAST tTSSt ~~1 y? YM.ca./ rr s..n ♦.ww . r: IA- 2ffiGY / I qyq 1 f. ah MK a.1r Yt x.L u..u Y M I y,Y N{ / 1/Hyl.b f- ~ 1Y.f CIIrM Dl.'7Y W1LC. n 0 r ny1N. LOT ONE H YI//A( Off N HOW 66 00 "0!''0`"`660 BLOCK ONE 66a smFwe 6-M W. Yp is z L92 f ( 1 *LFIT r MN. bUYw•,M F Ik y k.t,0 N fl ~2 i .If iYl r♦ YN Y11 rI_AW INt.,f r Y l SCAB 0140' Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission September 29, 1982 Page 5 7. Adequate screening consisting of a living screen or a six (ti) foot solid masonry wall shall be erected along any property line where general retail abuts low density sin- gle family residential housing in existence at the time this property is zoned planned development. 8. Any land use permitted in the general retail (GR) classi- fication of the zoning ordinance may be developed in the areas designated as general retail without amendment of the planned development (PD) ordinance. 9. If the development plans are not realized within five (5) years so that actual development includes some residential and is not limited to general retail, the planned develop- ment will be re-evaluated and considered a candidate for possible back-zoning to a smaller size center. Seconded by Mr. Sidor. Discussion followed about desirability of looking at proposal after five years as a possible candidate for back-zoning. Vote was called and motion carried unanimously. (7-0) Iii. Considerations A.pproval of the final plat of lot 1, block 1, B. F. Price Addition. (UNAPPROVED) ,Mr. Ellison advised that several people were present and had asked to address the Commission regarding this plat which is a one lot subdivision consisting of 1.333 acres. The property is zoned agricultural (A) and proposed devel- opment is a single family "Jim Walters" 11eme. The prop- erty was annexed ten to fifteen years ago. Mr. Ellison said that two separate issue%p are involved. When plat was considered by Development Review Committee, it was discovered that Riney Road had never been dedicated as a public road, therefore, one of requirements was that petitioner deed 3U feet of right-of-way for Riney Road. Petitioner informed staff this was impossible as he did not own property to centerline of Riney Road; that pre- vious owner had owned property for 30 years and did not own property to centerline of Riney Road. City Attorney's office was consulted and it was their opinion that since road has been used for a number of years it is a public Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission September 29, 1982 Page 6 road by implication, therefore, the petitioner should not be required to dedicate anything other than the 10 feet he owns for street widening, on question, Mr. Morris stated that it was determined that Riney Road, by implied dedication, is a public easement for use of the public. He said that city can improve the street. On further question, he stated that if property to east and west of Sellars' property is not platted, city would probably have to condemn property when widening of street becomes necessary. Mr. Ellison explained second issue to be considered as whether street and drainage improvements should be re- quired advising that subdivision regulations state this provision can be waived on property less than 3 lots or less than 3 acres in size, making this particular property eligible for the waiver. On question, Mr. Watkins advised that Riney Road is not shown on thoroughfare plan; however, it is his feeling that it functions as a collector street and will continue to do so as area develops. Mr. Ellison further advised that property is in a mostly undeveloped area; that a 40 foot building line is shown on plat as required in an agricultural (A) zoned area; that driveway and culvert plans have been provided; that elec- trical service will be Co-op; that no fire protection will be provided as no water service is available; that health department has reviewed and approved well system and sep- tic system. Wiliam D. Sellars, petitioner, appeared before Commission and asked that perimeter street paving ordinance and drainage requirements be waived as he would not be able to meet that expense. He said that his house would be located in the middle of the one plus acre tract. On question, Mr. Edwards stated that cost of improvements to petitioner would be approximately $11,000. Mr. Watkins advised that Planning and Community Develop- ment Department is opposed to waiver as there is nothing to prevent the property owners in the area from selling off one acre tracts all along Riney Road with none of owners being required to pave road, therefore, all city taxpayers would ultimately have to pay paving cost. He said this would be preferential treatment. Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission September 1982 Page 7 On question, Mr. Sellars stated that property was given to them by Mrs. Sellars' fath?r, that property to east is to be willed to other family members. on question, Mr. Watkins said that when that property is subdivided, it will also fall within waiver provision and Planning and Zoning Commission will be asked to make a decision. Mr. Sidor commented this could be establishing a precedent and asked what alternatives would be. Mr. Watkins answered that either the petitioner paves one half of road now, escrows paving cost or posts performance bond; or, if waiver is granted, paving alternatives are assessment paving program, where property owners on each side of street pay one third and city pays one third, or CIP. He further advised that if paving or performance bond is required there is a time problem as engineering design work has not been done; therefore, staff would have to recommend denial because of the time factor. He said that if street and drainage improvements requirement is waived, plat can be accepted. Mrs. Sellars said that if paving and drainage improvements are required, they will not get their house. Mr. Juren moved to recommend approval of lot 1, block 1, B. F. Price Addition, waiving paving and drainage require- ments. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried. L 7-0) B. Approval of the final plat of Jupiter Industrial Park. Mr. Ellison explained request stating this was a recent zoning change from agricultural (A) to light industrial (LI) on a 7.5 acre tract located on IH 35W service road south of Airport Road. He said that corrections have been made, plat meets requirements and Development: Review Com- mittee recommends approval. L. A. Nelson was present in support of the request. Ms. Gilchrist moved to recommend approval of final plat of Jupiter Industrial Park. Seconded by Mr. Escue and unani- mously carried. (7-0) cAs. 'Vittlam A c~ollaray 13006 Qucuss' .y d{ouston, C7txas 77079 ~ Vr 4. u ~155~_AC-AN b lcr ~~~\WW ~tT y S3! 3 p i982 APR 7 I°Rz April 3, 1982 To the Denton City Council, We rasp-OtM ly request that the name of the library be returned to the Emily Fowler Library, as it was intended by the people who helped work for and made possible the building of the library, fourteen years ago. It is our understanding, that the name was changed to aecomodate the computer presgram. For computer purposes, the library could be designated Fowler Public Library. ;lnyons today who is considering making a donation of time or a g!" of money to a Denton institution will pause and give thought to the fect chat their uiehos could be thoughtlessly disearded in the future. Therefore, our family respectfully requests that the name be returned to the Emily Fowler Library. Sincerely, z Pat(Fowler) and Bill Holloway k k ,~o YaTITION TO THE DLVWN CM IIUUNCIL N11tC"Mn% 7"vSStkv ~ O\y. \C\, We reepacttQUy reyueat that the name Of the public library be reotored to the orlaiml name or the DaLY FOWLER LMRARY. i Name Address Flout No. i i , 1 3s~f.373 ~saA~. I s 46 3 8 ~ - 18 ~ p 36 f' T S'v o 1 F? k~}/(/ r~ J~'3 - J 6 v-4 32 3 ~Q MITION TO 13D: DIMN CITY COUNCIL We respectfuUy request that the name of the public Library be restored to the origin &l tam of the EMILY F UR LMPA.4Y. r Naas Address Phase No. f, J /C!'•))7t .J _(`_fi~~i~.Vr1': I~i .c,. 3if'f._i ~{/~,2, 22 3 S'A- 9/ tll:~t IJ( r`.a I~.1 1 `I x'.11 •U ~7 14, 7n - J, It 1 atko 3o1'7 Q-i~>J-Ldz>L~L /mil Mrf-r%1Qe~ ssll B shop C+, Lakc~al}as 497-s3yS J~; ~ S t il~~ f 1 / _ 5-~~ I~~' 0/55 ttJ ~ / r GI/i 5309 GJ~'4t /ANO.C 1 4.L4~/,~s ~~7-•.131 {c. i ~YI/~.P7V( rtl.0C J it A 1TY lw ~ L•Y' 44) a)' :7 • ~.i 1 M ikTITlON 1y nix ntpftmN crN cu NciL We respectf l4 request that the aa+ce of the public library be restored to the original am* of the EKU F%LER LUMAW. ?lice Adlrecs Fbote No. J s- .~.a..Z.• Oor- 1-; lee off OIL, --,It AAZ Xu 0 80 1U o f o,Q S66 a o t 7 _ e1 U ~atf L~ , S'~ s-~c2,.~ b6cfi 4 4 e.% 4 3U -liKeO W; I 3sa- 3 . ~c' - 20 r~ r ,rte, _ _ ~`L'~ • (24 5 - i f ~ i V { I PETITION TO Inw DkMWN CM CULIWIr. .Y rep pectf,ilip request Mat the n+s-+e of 11e public library be restored to the w4iaal nam of the DaEY F LER LIBRARY. Nasty Address ppome_ No. 9 f, Ile, 41 -K w A .Z &X 31 R /"10104 74 (S,__•] x.17 G'tn tit-. "'AI-r 6 Axe, 3ES- 2j~L sD~~ d/J11w D / ` ~/f / J Bella. _ 1 A, , ' > 7i .1 ~i: rat, rl S~ f X83 ` tl c A-va 40 PET1TiUk 9V TU WYMN CITY OOUKIL We respectfully request that the name of the public library be restored to the i ortgiaal name of the EKILY FOWLER LMAm, 1 Name Address Phone Ro. ' J 6 ///~QJ /d~~•x. /1~Q1 rf_~i C!J oc~70 / 1~ [,'tJL RL~"/.Z 9 Z 7A' 9.9. 79 i'1 7 7 j (L/L 6+4 *J 1> ~ C1Jt, \1 fit,. ~C l a /L, I , . • YhTITION TO'aW DEMtrN CMY COUNCIL We respectfully request twat the name of the public library be restored to the w4laal new of the DatY FWLFR LMRARY. Name Adarecc Moat No. cSR,a l~1<//lane ~I 1 *~1sd09.4 Ad, re,',. 9.. 7*.) a'I S*.r 92 r q 1~~~~ 3wf x ton X s s i/~/ • o ~ .sera ~0,~.3 (2,t~tu+4 35/Q `ogglx, b'r'a-c!lr~~9 Viva. ~~Q11 ICa s_'7 0,. ~hso9 JJa-34/5 y11-4AN A- L l t e IN 21-7-ON, s- 1917 F72 44 v • J J3S ' l! , r 1 ♦ ~1'^ 177.- I !•JJ iA_I )~S i I T~ Pwal0N TO 71{F. DKIGI)N Ci_1Y COUNCIL Ve respectfully request that the rime of the pwblle Ilbrp--y be restored to the original nme of the EMILY KVDR LIBRA.SY. XcL%e Address Phcne No. it; clLe c.' f/G L- C.C♦/ - A . !J `.l ufi lt'i iS _1__I7.1_LJIr~ F 397 4-Y O t C a,:.,L J ~ ~ ' r MON TO M DEMS MY OOUBCIL Us respectfuly request that the pass of the public library be restored to tbs oriSioal name of the DaIX YOWLER UBIARY. Hose Address Phone No. • :L~r_, (u-*1i,,,~' (~~.c?)?~_itiar F,°_ ~ . fi{~:, yttt~, 9S~ a`{ ' ~3171.`L..v l~( G'_ ~~~C..E LKJ f~,lu. V•i 2~~/~ J~~%: t~ .;1-ry.L' t •3/-, L<ie r:i_,i. 3 S S~/~ rr C12Ud`.~3~ aa-ut'7h.R. &t- loom a.L•-z• ,~z _t! • s1 ~L c c LV'. ~M'. Ji ,1 _z . E o L~ 't -~a1' .1,~(;,1ti ! f ~ ~ I t •l 1~ ;~L'~ ~,~1 i1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~1 C ' 7 I t Late t • f _ pdTMON TD THE DEMM CITY COUNCIL We respectfully request that the name of the public 11brary be restored to the original tame of the E14LY FVlfiaft L'IAA.4Y. Name Address Fbate No. c o~ T r6r , Pew try /dryf~~//rkl~ ALL-, .2 572e 4. Lilt L ' to r, --k it 00 to e e, `~11.. li, ill. •f.{ //j~f.~lell'1_~i_~ ~~.~•~r['• Jr~~'!SJ 7 ✓ J ` f r Pt.MION TO T}U: Dh:M'ON CITY OOUMCIL Ve reepectAilly request that the mm of the public library be restored to the original nape of the EMILY F UM LIEF M, • 4 - tbwe Address / aPhooe~l?bq ' jut ~~Y~`QiT ~ ~tos d~atcu,Cw..eQ 3~Z~~jh'3 i vin a.~ 1 t L~.$~- GAG . 1 r i ~t / 1' ~ T 1 . rR 1 L` O L!.! ~G7J.. . u.. : I'f. 1 y • ~-~'t i'T~y_.7' ~~'1~i.++~^._'7 ai'a.r. ~ 3 ! ~T^'i .T7~- r' u - ell r j I PLTIT//II-ON TO THE tIIa~E-`Npl~',ON CITY ODUNCIL ^ w xe reap"tt'ully request that the name of the public library Ie restored to the original Lame of the WIX FNUR LIBRARY. 'r Ume - „ _Address Note No. 00 V %vy AI7 n - Jr'i lu n, P-4 d U x~ u~,eJ r ~ PETITION TO THE DEYMN CITY COUNCIL e1 We respectfully request that the name of the public libruy be restored to the original name of the EMILY KVUR LUAAAY. Tune Address Pbone No. - - U s 8 E !~_1~.~- a ~ 3s'oa C~i'e/r _ c3'7-.7l.~y Cip .U~tn~sc~ ~..1'.,•~. '~tu.t~, 3" 3 pot . 3's~ ~ L4 ~ !1 -33 ~L jJ ,~t.2.~~,, c.'~.,1 ~.L.w j~`OD ~ktUZe.• ~lu~I,~,~.. .3Y7' 1 ? 9~'. a/O. ~9ed .rte o~_ .sk ..~~3d.?•tSS~ f~ 4 Y Styfed /si t fr..~sa~ k4, ~r ~t>.ro39 Pei PWITION TO TAi; DFMN MY OOUNCiL \v4 &L\, 4-LXoVvr\`1t1: d0 ,111. t,•e respectfally request that the mme of the public library be restored to the criginal nwA of the LMliY F0WLa UPAMY, name Wrest Pbcce No. t ,•1_~.~~„-Tt~-~`~; -its...' J~ t.s---=~,, •~S .7~ S'/ ~Yx IL A-I '.il~^~--f ~~,...•l , t'. ~~?l/• ~ l~ t:-e.=^~_._.L~<<~/ir_F_l~.Si.C.~S.. ! .~_•a ~;~(J /J1(I r; l.dt t Y t-( , L:.L..- -1'~ , i i(. ~t..• ~ j- a ~i'~t' J 7j~r.r, L`/c.._~ijjl.r.`'f.E f.._~L~.'.Sl _J_~ :~r__~_._.._ •`~'/f.~,t. J AdA, ' - S5S1 AtTURNED FOR PDS?AGE { WITION TO 'M Dejr,'ON CI'IY CDOCIL ue respectfully request that the rare of the public library be restored to the original name of the EXICY FV R LIMARt. 4 rvse - Address - - Fbcce 5o.: i~ r t I If , Aj, Ze ~03 2- -72 !1 1`4A,et~ J /~I'JJ~M! s, _ _ _ . ~ ~ ! E ~An-71./ F✓~~ ~,e, V?~~-~~-^-~r! •C.~LYd.4.-G~✓. _ .2 D ~i~c~-t.tc-`~ jq~A t4 ZC4 PLsTITION TO THE DENTON CI1Y`COUNCIL We respectfully request that the came of the Public library be restored to the original new of the DULY FOWLER LIBRARY. Name Address Phcoe No. k Z /Qd.? 391-G 7YQ 9Z al 61 <WwAi - 707 yi,W -ey. ~dG~-7Q~v Svtsa~~ YZ:~c~ X14 L W W (V 64rz 4 JJ r ~ I~~fe«~L (L q til ~ykl~e+ 3 3 79 ?LTMON TO TILE DLMN CITE COUNCIL We respectfully request that the awe of the public Iibrary be restored to the origical name of the DaLY FOW= LIBRARY. i Nacre Address 2hoee No. h r _ ' /fJlh' n 2-S , t -4- ao3 h:,~ err, /d S G~1• M~ ~ BeaRy 3~~ -~~s.r f Mt la0V w toroG1LfLS 4X414 a 8 C~L 403 41 4r-> ' ~ e. i.. OIA li erlLJ~ _~821~4~ . ~~'/LU<t (.'4t cif ~~C't'!-,'i •~ccr,~clfa Li ~ 7;17 3b0„nr,~,-O,,Q~M~o F%TITION TO THE DtMN CITY COUNCIL Ye respectfully requert that the name of the public library be restored to the ccUiaal name of the EXILY Fi0 IM LMRARY. 1 Name Address Phooe N0. ell 1f 3Y 1 -L0 3c ,J IIlG2t-LCtl ~l 1fh 11C% ✓4l"/.~'l. ~~/1'~ • 1 PLTMON TO Tl[N DlYMN CITY COUNCIL f MMt„~, duo w 10\ , rv, 0t p.m . 3 We res}vetfully request that the name of the public library be restored to the crigiml name of the EMILr FOWLER LIBRARY. Name Address Rope No. ti . M. asH~asr ~/L t/.0w~ ~k2 - if 72/ ~ rte, G-✓3 -s' Ce-Et~'~s-~ 4. C J r / v ~1-L1 S~ p 3 fl"3"iLl'Y! (4r,,.D, crat,r,/~ ~.5 1 b2n ^i' 2} l~d/'B'iz Sa'? ,1 Crpe Sb6 -01t CI-11 z V m 43 -Z kx- 9 6 77 77- l - i 2e ct /i /m L,C~cc(ti ~7~~ e ;Z 01 L 6,_ 6(6 LU,OA, PL71TION TO THE M2MN MY OOuwciL We rempeclful]y request that the mice of the public library be re.tored to the orlsiml moe of the DaM ANLPR LIB M. ?lame Address Phcae No. A L/G /o z I 38 L 6S"b~ 0 i 'f _ 42 -3 7 - d8 i 1 QnN l~n~vlle 3~S 3 s re ss~ U r~ L.~c~<< 2.3 LJ. C , ~•C*t-}~L-,• K~ k+-w... $L~- ~eTo2 ~S7-6S~I t'N h/- A _ ~nu:,,,~ ~ .~e~,.~• S06 f'vtu~osi. 3Sz -GS~c~ Utitllt, !T~ 4a_jt2 CftJ 7~ 1._ 7. +~a 3 !O lvz1 -5-3 t.ca~ - ~ ~ a L, ~ a PETITION TO M DEMTON CM ODUNCIL We respectfvlly request that the mw of the public library be restored to the orUiasl mam of the EK= FOWIM MUM raw Address Phaoe No. YMo d~o~ ..~ty ~e~Ct. X30 B ~ae~v c~ a 3ga- &017 .c1o.e aaoT i 1 -'lY xOf O ~~I-~~~~VYY F ~t~sz . f v • 3tia- i~ i8 9/L \G1b, ka,." 645 L-94 6 /6 el A,11 C / / ,-3t3-4'i95 Jr1d ,Ce. Ezr~~pL/ ` 123 ~c4viL.1`a,, a#sa 6aQ; CE l. ci~`,2r nt(.~1~...hti-~ J~; :y;.:•.i~{!`~' -lam I x ~l1~^ii':C ,i1..~c-' 1Jc,~ ,~'c,~•i/, '7~,~.o-,~ ~1~~ "ICao I 974 r...Yl~. •/Y: w. n., IJ...r na-. ..I.♦. ~ i r.I Y.. J..I..\ • ♦ wI...I. •.'.f'..\t • .A~ V Y.~ V./.- it J., _ \ 3 ~z - 2- J .3 gam- P' 9 3d- b r y ~ ~ ~,~~,~,,.-y..,~.2_ ~ ~ .~o~ 71J ' ' _ ~ Q -s'~ 9 fjz~r~~.e~Q, ~ ~ /9~g PQ ~q~~ 4.,,,...,-.i ' . a ~ fi ~ ....,.ea.wm...~..•arr.. . ...r. •n n. a~..• .,.i~.,.n.rs.';•_.uw ~`'e nr v • `?,oo . Ca.......~._.. 38.7.." r~C'7I 7 p y~ ..ham ' y~c -3~ o v.e. ~ R•. b P ~ t..~ 'f vi'a' 3 r 10, CfJ yo ' . ,S 6 7 8'S 01 A 52~Q ~ • . 0 3 moo. ~ ~~t.G 3~~ - ~ 7'D v w .rJ.. s.'N\1\. •./-l Y.~ •\R'_i.. •11. I:..• .1uMN.. In w.r. •.~..,♦.M..v q •R ..r ell - J~ta~'~tj~,._~=c.Le-z~. ,2~os..Y~t~c~Cf'C~,. ,.u._ ~F7-, a 3•S.~ r MITION TO M DEMN MY OOUNCIL Ve respectfully request the' the na4: of th•= public library be restored to t2A e original acme of the DULY FOWIa UiPAN 6 RIM Address Pbone, No_ 17 Of /A i f .a ~a3r l Y~~ -T w-l~- ~ l:~ ~~3.~ •.358 V.'j 1. U ~ ~.bt.~at t•c.v- ~ - are.,^~ O`er °y AT(,7 tt4 rr _7 r , ss'a • ~s 1 . t _ t Pro. /d3/ y _ _ "fir. f M I PETITION TO M DeMN CM ODUNCIL { We respectfully request that the name of the j public library be restored to the original new of the Da Y AWLER LIBRARY. i Name Address Phone Nn. 1 /lam 4aY rnaG:. 342 -1yyY J l ~ ICJV 1. 0,0~, { ! x3.~c~ 3319 m.~~,~'U+e, 317-lysz> c .l ~ste.~ 1,91; 7eG44eZ6c #fltei6 S-6 6-3167 Iiij i~'~ L~'~« ~z v E~$. L =rte - = jj • ilee,~' ~,2 as /~'d/~v nkti 3b'l- /G 5 ~z1;. - sISs 1< 1~z1 ~.s~.q~rs•~~ - 1'e i C rJ PI MM TO TBE DEMTOM CITY OOUNCIL Mt respeetf L4 request that the seas of the publia library be restored to the i crigieal now of tae ZKCM FOr = LI AW, 1~, o mom Address ftmt 30. c rr(n,~1~1 f i-Ytc ~ 4 td, j/. q7 tr- U c~ UAL C mix (D Art clra V~nlra- only .3.P9~*%929 -TY-ca--U ; ~ 18v1 ~t,L~rn 343-27L 1 r'.~ tn~ n9a~-~, a ~ os ~~lvtiut~-a~ 38 ~f . ~ ~ 2, P J PETITION TO 'ffi DEIVON MY OOUNCIL We respectfuLly request that the tow of tba public library be restored to the i crUiasl ume of the EKIIY POWESR IMM. YAM Address Pbeoe Ito. o G t~:Cl VI 3S7 • L. <Lil r~ bLti 14 211CLA cU 3 6-j • -v / 70.9- J~ 2?.40-~l~lc a 3 2 -5 .3 O'~t=t.r-~o. ~~t~f~~n.•ir~ 7c~ r 171 l~ PUrf ION TO THE DMOM CITY COUNCIL We respectfully request L% t\ name of the public library be reotored to the j original came of the DaLY SWLER LMPARY4 Raw idress Phone No. 9 Ce 0-44~et%r ZX r~~0e s~ u`~~" G r . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Srt YSS ZsY env, sY +c L;~- X 4 ` ~OfL.r•ea. 7~?S I~t7G.. S~ ~-M 7e.4 ti Rr ~ ~x ck~ C SEA li .ts►s..=.nr clr' ~ 2_ r,! ~ TJr 317-/..y z /S os ta., c-trn.c~ru. K-- /,so o Pa,k.~ 1~. 3?.t - ~ s ,z q M. 4-" 9 ray~~_ . o6S rded % E2 -~/t 'A 6A 2fA &P 377-2-2t Aw& 'Aw k3zs r dOL9 3e.2 -j5/// .3 p 7- ;v ~~tL 7'1~ ~»te.l~t ~/C'I G.~rt[~Nct..•c.. e'5,~7-.i~..1G "Oil yl~ Xth 7 FhTIVON TO THE Dk:tl S CITY QIUNCIL We respectfully request that the aaae of the public library be restored to the original name of the EMY FOWUM LIBRARY. / Name rf c? , Address Fbome No. St" 4"'i t ~7-bh1✓ ~~j ~ * ~r~'' ~ ~T!~~~t-relc~, ~/L~ ✓ gil C 1' 9f/ PLTITION TO 7SE MIMN CITY COUNCIL We respectfully request that the nwA of the public library be restored to the original oeme of the MLY Ma LIBRARY. t j I Nome Address Pbooe No. i i X23 8 W 3 S2 2- zG6 d ti ~L 013 ~Lti y3 Sl -63? 1-- N 41 All. -1 7 rYt~(.(. ~ellc, s64 • too9 - . T-40-'a Alf/v QLMi.K'(ti `,NCI a Ft ~ 0Cx ~EC•A pcn'cn _ xQ`1 TS"t^ t MITION TO TTi_' DN:,YM CITY COUNCIL We respectfully request that the ruuw, oC the public library be reotored to the original ame of the LVLY kUWt UNWI. Nome A.ldreuu lboae No. 1 .J~ yo / S"Q c c / A c~ ~ '34?7-A7 i s- • i _'~.ct2'1L.r"}.~.'`',}-.~";; c.l i1 n •1 ~ 4r~,,~ % •..c .'0 L ✓a U 2-[J wuG~ ON,& .311-fib 33 .011 1/. 239~~-7621 3~7-t'ub9 LdCc J kL qzn,, 7/o 3 Y 7- 7Z 2L PhTIT ON TO 1115 DEM N C11Y COUNCIL \)4AkL`, QMkh-Iq,'1'~op•m. We respectfuny request that the nwce of the public 11Lra" be restored to the original now of the t?41fY FOWUN EM"?f. - A w" AMldmw lhcoe No. I 1'41 3 7- i1Y (>ft c~ k ^ [C~LJv i <<; i ? c-. / Jr/ S t ~ 1r n '7 l.'`'~.~ti-~•-. Iii dl~ C. ~1. V .fp\.r '~r'• a~.~• ~i"~--7.i ~L.t., u i.^ ~-f t.l. J ~ l~ 't-C .,t /'~-.i wn N... L;LL 1 MITION TO IM DAMN V17Y CUVNCIL We respectfully request that the wmc of the public library be restored to the original now of the DULY FOWIA4 faANAM Nam AdJrcuu Phone No. 1 v)A U-t4,t,L,,j z ry~ e 1/ /,ls+~.~lc 1. j,4 =1_ - ~ rr " i r` -s7 c i'Z. - tC•N ~L t »k.~./' ~r~ 1~.~!lllio~%~ ~.~r -~E' J • ~''lc~: ,Sc~_-,~ i'•_--area,,. ( ,1 I 1y:'-y"sue 1C e?L-, Cc t4 L v + Wyk~~ i4 0 . i t PL?rrIUN 'IV Me bh:}RUN CITY CVIINCIL We respectfully requeot that the ru%e of the public library be restored to the crigiifal acme of the MLY MwI4.1+ LIBIwY. i Name Addrec. Ibcoe No. 3 3-7- V YL Gam. 39~ a33f6 x Grf~~~ 41 3Y 01 f l~~ 1 t 1 t I }1i f { y , / . ,•ir.~~r,° i _}1.11 % to ~1 f "it -O let, I i Yb MON TO TM DEMN MY COUNCI L We respectfully request that the sake of the public library be restored to the arL U4 acme of the MLY YW EA LI PARY. -1 • I Nase _ Addreac Phoce No. V Z r~tr e ,L t~,t 3f7~bs~ / to 1 ' 1 lL~~, t.s ~1~+_'.~-C-t n_rh. )f!' ~ t ~ ~a,..C. ?.I ~ ./J%/r .CCt VO 1 +LCG/b~t'C~ ~-d fl p~ e r~ ~ v PLTP:YON TO WE DEMN C17Y COUNCIL lov We respectfully reques4 that the r6=e of the public library be restored to the original name of the DAILY FNU2 LIY+AARY. Kaye Address Fbcae NO. • 3 - Z-y a ~ ' t a Y gx 7~1cul~•,L y•L'/. ,j~/Do /~iE.t. ti/,~ ,j~~' S~VY r J-41-11 f3A-i►~2k_ _ -312 Pik ~Y_ > s~ ~l~c.c ti~i-i.•-ti...- _ ~`'fi.t ~ !~Cl ct.t~--_ ~ S~ I C? alit I J PwrFION TO THE WITON CITY OOUNCIL ue respectfully request that the name of the public library be restored to the original name of the MLY FOW R UBRARY, i FAUN P Address / Phone No. l ICI ~ CSk aa.s" r~'Yll~.iL { r' IL.~tL)~l fh 4 S' /r .111J~ L.L.4-,,- L l C<. t Jl . )A ,t kc.-. 44w- .t -'r- 4 •7YJ J fA el 11 CZe ` , c / ,t, ' 1,C r /•~'i /,/!i ~...i .t a/1. !/r•~ /n0r'iCrw.f l.r~C=C ~ `r y~ 4 i- ~.}r I • C / (1fa~~ Cl . ~ ~~dt J i__ - fir l~' ~k IL 1 ' .s... ..._r. r.I rLW ~-Y ~~t r.,......r Y......... r•.r _»rr -...._-.w.. r-. .s...l:s/, .yit~.. r ....I. _ • r 1 ~ PITITION TO THE DEUMN CM COUWIG We respectfully request that the name of the public library be restored to the original name of the MLY TNI a LIMM Nerae Address Pboce No. i J -21 - 21221! -7 -9 307 2 -,fir ell v t' . r- a?GOL 25S/ 4;J &Y1l 113 3 ,E i PETITION TO THE DEMN CITY COUNCIL 1 We respectfully request that the rime of the public library Da restored to the + orUical came of the E#QIY FwLa LURPARY. N~ Address Phow No. [ t 31n a t 2CG F fl+, l9 / f ! . !n e'i.-. b~ •..~J A.i~ is iC ~ ~ i I .//.%.J ✓ J 'J /1 L r `1 Zt' lei/ Ltcrit-,,...C~ 931 1 i I f "d Lt L ~j r ~j ti~,•.~l L 2? 7 _ -~i •tv//J. ~.~L 1r~.lJLl ~~1 r.~~~~~~.li. //12 ~O Y•~~yj/ ' r • ~~~'%.7~ ~!AC ~CJ~ht'•-71/ '1.+,; l.i. J 1 ~/~',{r ~ t i.` .A, ` /i+/ J7 ~ 1 I 1 PLTr?ION TO ME DLIMN CITY COUNCIL we respeetfu2>,y request that the name of the public libr&ri be restored to the original name of the ;WIY FINU i LIBRARY. Name Address _ Fbone No. ~~f_S•~iq~AL'~- L4ie.s ~jdL~d.:~~_/~ _/3.Jr 0 fa . ti S44 - 0166y 2'16 Ad'agIZ41- -ILL lam BOA An 1giD tr6 b 33 3 -4 3,46 4 04 7 /j(a,llu t f nrd .....-r.u. .t_ir-w.a iA. ti.... r.,_. _ .u r1.Yr.w w.. l f PhTITION To 771E Dt2MN CITY COUNCIL •i ~ ti ~ho,, \ ~4~~, d~o~Y-1`151' 00 p,t1~ . We respectfully request that the name of the public library be restored to the original name of the EMILY PNIXR LIBRARY. Name Address Phme No. 67 ,~o Cwt/- ,38,t•~o~,z. A.C-- I 90AM G 3g/•OR 7 AaJ3P.7-O91o ela .gab.-L~ ~v UL 11-241d AO #I a cs e. r bar C -,361 K)_ QREaAe4N R& 7 -(oRrz _./q 10 a ' L P 0~~ ~ $ FoX C~~'C~E 3 8x'zg68 -}PE..TITION TO ZLE DMI N cm COUN n /10 r We respectfuUy request that the naaa of the publio lib 1 ~Q racy be restored to the \ 1 ortainal name of the LILY FONLLR LIBRARY. I i Nerve Address Phone No. c Aiic;li 6 '3 ~ ~.yz f ,,..z. ~ / ~3 ~ `%~-~t':• S~. ! -!s't'd 5! 5/ cccc. ~2~t ~5 ~ `c<<cc~cLZ(e 'Q fcL• L3. ~s "I- ; ^ ✓ 1. tLL ~i.. 7. •F Ii6L: r1 Kf V L G Vj 7. -2 ~r 0a /,ccf 3Ff i, 4'- E ~ L' 351 r~ 1 f ~R PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To. Denton City Council Case No. Z-1540 Date: October 190 1982 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Fred H. Deal Denton 288 Associates 3624 Oak Lawn, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75219 Status of Applicant: Owners Requested Action: Change of zoning from agricultural (A) classification to planned development (PD) classification. Location: Beginning at Southwest and Southeast corners of East McKinney and Loop 288 and extending southward approximately 2175 feet along both sides of Loop 288. Size: 60.7 acres west of Loop 288 52.18 acres east of Loop 288 112.88 acres total Existing Land Use: Predominantly vacant or agricultural uses and one single family residence. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: East of Loop 288 North - Foxworfh-Galbraith, vacant, single family residential; LI, Agricultural South - Vacant, agricultural, Pecan Creek; LI East - Heritage Roof Tiles; Welding Shop, mini-warehouses; LI West - Loop 268 Z-1540 Page 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (Continued) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning; West of Loop 288 NorrtF PtiTIf_ps_ 66, Piggly Wiggly► Dairy Queen; General Retail (GR) South - Single family residential, Pecan Creek, vacant, a ricul- tural; Agricultural (A West - Single family residential, agricultural, vacant; Agricultural (A) East - Loop 288 Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as Moderate Intensity. SPECIAL INFORMATION Physical Characteristics: Approximately 21 acres of this 112.88 acre tract lies within the Pecan Creek 100 year floodway which is located along the southern edge of the prop- erty. Approximately six (6) more acres of the interior property is sit- uated in the flood plain. The devel- opment proposal reserves the floodway and flood plain areas as open space. Vegetation consists of large trees in concentrated areas throughout the project site, but principally in the Pecan Creek area, and grass. Transportation: This property has immediate access to Loop 288 (primary arterial) and East McKinney (secondary arterial). I Z-1540 Page 3 SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Transportation: A collector street which is generally (Cont'd) consistent with the approved City of Denton thoroughfare plan is included as part of this proposed planned de- velopment. This collector street is shown to extend through the property to serve minor streets and direct traffic onto East McKinney and Loop 288. The intent appears to be to minimize points of access onto Loop 280 in order that the thoroughfare can function safely in moving vehicular traffic. Public Utilities: Adequate electrical, water and sewer service is available for extension to this site. ANALYSIS This 112.88 acre tract is undeveloped land primarily located in an area designated as a moderate intensity center, The total tract is divided into two parcels, a little less than equal in size, that are separated by Loop 288. There is an existing res- idence on the project site and the abutting property both east and south of this property is zoned light industrial (LI). The major intersection has a lumber and supply company in the north- east corner and a gasoline station and convenience store on the northwest corner. Multi-family (MF-1) development lies further north along Loop 288 and single family development and a Piggly Wiggly store exist northwest of this site. This requesL for planned development (PD) zoning represents an attempt on the part of the property owners and petitioners, to design a land use proposal which conforms to specific and gen- era'i policies in the Development guide regarding ,roderate ac- tivity centers and the planned community concept. Individual land use areas or components of the planned development will be Z-1540 Page 4 ANALYSIS (Continued) commented on with respect to their conformity to specific and overall policies; however, it appears that the petitioners have generally succeeded in devising a proposal that complies with Denton Development Guide recommendations and policies. When proposals of this nature are being evaluated, there are some questions and issues that are subject to differing interpre- tations. This is particularly the case in moderate intensity areas because they are somewhere in the middle of high and low intensity areas, and they are written to strongly encourage diversity in land uses. In terms of diversity, it is felt that this proposal is eligible for the recommended size bonus prescribed by the Development 30 Guide. The size of moderate activity centers should be from acres to 250 acres with the centers proposing a mixture of land uses. It is suggested that a moderate center that encourages diversity and the community unit concept be towards the higher end of the acreage range, whereas, a specialized center (e.g. predominantly commercial) should be towards the smaller end of the acreage range. Again, the interpretation is that this pro- posal generally qualifies for the size bonus because of its di- versity and adherence to the community unit concept; however, the one factor regarding this policy which does not make this proposal totally acceptable is the fact that the property own- ers' admitted intent in seeking rezoning is speculative in na- ture. There are no indications that any immediate development is proposed, and the development guide policy regarding size bonus for diversity recommends that such judgements be made on proposed development that will be realized within five years. Acknowledging the fact that it is extremely difficult to antic- ipate when, and how, development will occur, the guide further suggests that the areas benefiting from the size bonus be sub- ject to reconsideration (bye^k-zoning) to a smaller sized center if development plans are not realized within five (5) years. Z-1540 Page 5 ANALYSIS (Continued) Intensity is critical in that moderate activity centers should not be allowed to exceed area standards and in reality evolve into high intensity or major activity centers. Strip commer- cial, retail, or other unsightly and inefficient concentrations are discouraged and can be avoided through the use of site plan- ning, buffer zones, open spaces, and aforementioned mixtures of laid uses. An intensity study (see graphic analysis of land use intensity analysis) has been conducted and the proposal is with- in the area intensity standard; however, as a footnote, policy and decision makers should understand that if approved, this zoning would practically utilize all of the area intensity. Unless standards and policies are changed in the future, this limits the ability of additional contiguous areas to comply with intensity standards if retail and other high intensity uses are proposed. A reduction in gross acreage reserved for general retail (GR) land uses to a maximum of 6 - 10 acres would be a plus when considering future development proposals. Designa'.ing some of the proposed general retail space for office or some other lower intensity use is another desirable alternative. Adequate open space and transition is proposed as part of this development, therefore, retail or commercial strips and undesir- able concentrations are basically avoided. The general retail area totals 15.15 acres and is divided by Loop 288 so that 10.18 acres are proposed at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and fast McKinney and 4.97 acres are proposed at the soiitheast corner of Loop 288 and East McKinney. A 16.16 acre single family attached residential area backs up against the southern boundary of the 10 acre general retail area and extends along the west side of Loop 288. This area is pro- posed for the development of attached condominiums or townhouses and would act as a buffer between Loop 288 and the detached sin- gle family residential area on the extreme western portion of the property. The general retail area and the single family attached area should be buffered through the use of landscaping and/or a screening wall or fence. Density should be limited to 10 units per acre in the single family attached area. GRAPHIC EXAMPLE 2-1540 OF LAND USE INTENSITY ANALYSIS 'DEVELOPMENT GUIDE ANALYSIS OF A N1ODERATF. STANDARD- MAXIMUM STANDARD 1 FOR TOTAL 28,300 I 20829 - UNUSED J CAPACI~ ANALYSIS STUDY AREA TRIPS TRIPS CAPACITY f MODERATE INTENSITY 250 I 17,701 TRIPS tMNERATED STANDARD TRIPS PER ACRE TRIPS BY PRtDPOSED DEVE IDPMENT 620 TRIPS DESERVED p TRIPS FOR V~%CANT 11 ACRES OF EXISTING RETAIL ZONING TO NORTH STUDY AREA (FOXWORTH-GALBRAITH, BOUNDARIES SHELL STATION, DAIRY I ~IUEEN) THROUGH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TERMINATING AT THE CREEK TO THE SOUTH STUDY AREA 113.2 ACRES I 7,150 r3APS ` TRIPS GENEI& TED BY SIZE (SIZE BONUS FOR DIVERSITY) (11 ACRES) EX-STING LAi{"Ii US E Z-1540 Page 7 ANALYSIS (Continued) The high density residential area constitutes the predominant land use on the portion of the property adjacent and east of Loop 288 and south of East McKinney. A total of 34.85 acres of multi-family land use is projected for the planned development, and if limited to 22 units per acre as suggested by the peti- tioner, approximately 767 units are conceivable. The Develop- ment Guide recommends moderate concentration of apartments (500-1000 units) in this moderate activity center, thus, this proposal consumes 3/4 of the recommended standard. As in the case of the intensity standard, the apartment concentration is near what is recommended as a maximum, therefore, future re- quests for high density housing will have a difficult time complying with the policies unless the policy and decision makers are resolved to modify the standards and policies. When considering multi-family development, one should also keep in mind the fact that the existing policies permit such development in all intensity areas. If the concentration is limited and other criteria such as adequate site planning and accessibility to collector streets or larger is provided, multi-family pro- posals could conceivably meet development guide policies in low intensity areas adjacent to this moderate activity center. A total of 31.16 acres of multi-family development is proposed on the east side of Loop 288 and an additional 3.69 acres are re- served for multi-family use on the west side between the pro- posed collector street and the northern boundary of the Pecarl Creek floodway. The multifamily sections are designated so that the maximum concentration in any one contiguous area is 13.75 acres. This would allow approximately 302 units. The site plan includes generous open space areas and a collector street which should aid in diluting concentration of the units. The open space will entail all of that land which lies in the floodway and flood plain. Development is prohibited within a floodway, and development in flood plain areas is contingent upon extensive engineering studies and requirements for elevat- ing any structures to an acceptable height above the 100 year flood. The Development Guide recommends that apartment develop- ments provide their own recreational areas, Ad, if attached as a condition, the open space areas could become functional as multi-family development occurs in the future. Z-1540 Page S SUMMARY This overall proposal appears to qualify for the size bonus suggested for moderate activity centers that are diverse and planned with the community unit concept in mind. Additional positive features include immediate access to arterial streets, a proposed collec.or street which basically matches the thor- oughfare plan and sufficient green space andbep n areas. unless tensity is somewhat acceptable. but it must noted that policies and standards are modified, future proposals within this moderate activity area must be carefully evaluated to en- If a portion sure that a high intensity center is not created. of the general retail areas were designated for office or some other lower intensity use, the intensity factor would be even more favorable. It is also significant that futuremdevelopment of the diversified land uses occur in a consistent nr, and is especially not limited to the general retail areas. Proposed concentration of apartment units is within the standards for the area, but the ability of each development to utilize open space a, as to provide its vAn recreational facilities cannot be judged until specific site plans are received for review. The proposed plan does not create tprovidecommercial dev lopyent end planned development zoning does sure strict plan control. RECOMMENDATION F. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1540 by a vote of 1 - 0 with the following conditions: 1. Land uses within the planned development are restricted to the uses specifically designated on the general concept plan; specific site plan apps-3val must be granted before development occurs within the designated land use areas. 2. Specific development proNnsils shall conform to City of Denton requirements regarding zoning use classifications, subdivision regulations, bui VI ng codes and any other codes related to development. Z-1540 / Page 9 RECOMMENDATION (Continued) 3. Density in multi-family areas shall be limited to 22 units per acre. 4. Density in single family attached areas shall be limited to 10 units per acre. 5. Residential streets in accordance with City of Denton standards shall be provided for internal circulation. 6. A living screen or a six (6) foot masonry wall must be erected between the 10.18 acre retail area at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and East McKinney and the single family attached area beginning at its southern boundary when the general retail area is developed. 1. Adequate screening consisting of a living screen or a 6 foot solid masonry wall shall be erected along any property line where general retail abuts low density single family resi- dential housing when the general retail area is developed. 8. Any land use permitted in the general retail (GR) classifi- cation of the zoning ordinance may be developed in the areas , designated as general retail without amendment of the planned developmen'6 (PD) ordinance. 9. If the development plans are not realized within five (5) years so that actual development includes some residential and is not limited to general retail, the planned develop- ment will be re-evaluated and considered a candidate for possible back-zoning to a smaller size center. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve Planned Development zoning with conditions. 2. Approve Planned Development zoning without conditions. 3. Approve Planned Development with modified or additional conditions. 4. Deny petition. 5. Table for future consideration. I Z-1540 Page 10 ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Site plan 3. Reply form total 4. Property owners list 5. Planning and Zoning commission minutes of September 29, 1982 Page 11_ Z-1540 DEVELOPMENT (AIDE COLE WT DEVELOPMENT RATING COMPARED TO POLICY POLICY slishtlJ NIA or slightly Unacceptable Unacceptable Unsure Acceptable Acceptab G Moderate Area Plan is utilizing 86% of unallocated intensity. Intensity A bonus size is giv X Standard* en for diversity.-- Land Use Diversity office or some other X Encouraged lower intensity use designations on por- tion of general re- tail areas would make proposal total- ly acceptable. Existing low den- PD Zoning provided. X sity within one block protected by site plan control, etc. Proposed plan dis- courages strip commercial. X Access to Collec- Loop 288 and East X for Streets or McKinney are arter- greater. ials; proposed col- lector consistent with thoroughfare plan. Adequate open space All floodway and X recreational areas flood plain (26 and diversity of acres) reserved as parks. open space. Un- known if open space will be utilized as recreational areas to serve multi-fam- ily sections. Concentration of 767 units are pro- X multi-family lim- posed, ited to 500-1000 units. *Due to some uncer ainity in realizing diversity. SITE PLAN YETROPLEK EOUITIES GENERAL. RETAIL T k,NNFr DISTRICT GENERAL, S RETAIL SITE PLAN LAND USE ISTRICI r uea Aqa , Ae 3z+ 10.18 ac. - ,.8 F S N O o 34 O s*, 4.97 me. ti CC Fn.~r iv 4 :.lC'.)q <rcEt. qJ.1-Cr-wAr i.Si . 1.47 aC.-7 tiP~ tDti„ rIz.BD OC~ES i tJ ~Cp MULTI-FAMILY r SNGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT °V MULTI-FAMILY V ^A,NAVSic c. A?.:aAz c DWELLING DISTRIC-' ATTA(HED Qcti p°<_ D'REL JNG DISTRICT 10.0 aC• a° . 0 01 0 13.75 ac. u.~, aasc o e_a,rr A_. 1er1d aC. 1a •O a i► MULTI-FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED L o DWELLING OISTRIC DWELLING DISTRICT 242 so. 2. 9 s 7.41 ac. 10.25 ac. O MULT -FAMILY ; i DVELLI IG DISTRICT r4DaCSED CDllf C1;P SIaEEt' ~ c..r••••;•c•.t 3.a9 Be. SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED io0-TEAR fIODDMAt CrEp SPACE DWELLING DISTRICT 10.3480. CREEK ~--r 10.6500. CItY COUNCIL Z-1540 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Christine Dickie Laney None Received None Received 1850 Veranda Dr. Nest Columbia, TX 77486 Fred H. Deal Harrison Freedman Assoc., Inc. 3624 Oak Lawn, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75219 (214) 528-5930 John .1. Ricci 5700 Mabry Dr. Clovis, NM 88101 (505) 769-2626 David Martino Martino Realty Co. 1222 Emerson Lane Denton, TX 76201 r 9 e G u Praijl* e T S Ste . ! At kLmou 619- •t edrlr~ss ~l,en.r S' $ G I r 1 e4VIkot, R c W 9A "Sid y r. re P1 .t P.E. Six gels ,0~~~.~ MI6 2e! 1 Igo Ac. konome, ~t ' 2 l S k• c a~ 41~ E c k~.At2~-`I b 01 "P.4. 'PAX S 91Ad-l- Ihf- N- IAA ,B ~.z cy H ~2 99 X49 Dre{e„ ref ? 6 /4A, X' Ada is A C c ? Qedbrmk A& r &AJA.1 74 Ae l la! Cor _x y ? ~~e nee 1 • L__ - ~rd~!_~2~~_t_~ ~'2ht,~ _ 'I !'e. A TrYi~~ ~x _6 _ ~1 an ~Ci n s Re, Bey X0111 , ,t}arlcs ?X ~sa36 ? f3 E. At. I n FoXIAISAI 1 u Ce ALOIt ID /3 r ' Rt.N Co. &gPLagid f /.t .t A alt rtJM Z n . 4 a 8 ,E. X ' Al. M.? 11 go A X l d 7 e 1s , n C Sec ad.+rtas obeot D, 91 . c kg"4,7f Ate ' f Ce % S S e t Gr. LIM IS Agol s 1 9 wNsAfee 1, Ails At Kf*hmpy Si. f` Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission September 29, 1982 A special called meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, September 29, 1982, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building. Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue, Jr., Marilyn Gilchrist, Gary Juren, Robert LaForte and Andy Sidor Absent: None Present from Staff: Charles Watkins, Senior Planner; David Ellison, Development Review Planner; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Greg Edwards, City Engineer, and Audrey Bachman, secretary Chairman Robert LaForte called the meeting to order. L.. Approval of the minutes of the September 15, 1982 regular meeting. Mr. Sidor moved to approve minutes of the regular meeting of September 15, 1982. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried. II. Public Nearing rZ 1540. This is the petition of Fred H. Deal representing Denton 288 Associates, requesting a change of zoning from (UNAPPROVED) agricultural (A) to planned development (PD) classification on 112.88 acres of property beginning at the southeast and southwest corners of East McKinney Street and Loop 288 and extending southward approximately 2175 feet along both sides of Loop 288. The following land uses are proposed in the request for planned development (PD) zoning: Single family detached residential 15.8 acres Single family attached residential 16.16 acres Multi-family residential 34.85 acres General rL"ail 15.15 acres Greenbelt and/or Open Space 2b.41 acres Proposed collector street 4.51 acres Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission September 29, 1952 Page 2 Air. Ellison advised that there is a slight difference in acreage of each use In the site plan submitted to Commission for consideration and the public notice mailed to property owners in the area, stating that after notice was sent out petitioner hired an engineer who came up with new figures and a new site plan. He said there is slightly less retail and more greenbelt, that no development is proposed in floodway or Cloud plain. he further stated that 17 notices were mailed to property owners, 7 reply forms were received in favor, one telephone call from a property owner within 200 feet was re- ceived in favor, no reply forms were received in opposition. Fred Deal, petitioner, stated they have owned property eight or nine years and that he represents all partners. They feel now is the time to develop property, they have worked with staff and come up with this development and are requesting rezoning for planned dovelopnent (PD). Their intention is to begin development within the next 12 months, if possible. on question, he said first step would be development of a small retail area, then the collector street through the project, at which time they would attempt to secure individual developers for residential portion. He said they are primarily shopping center developers with holdings of about 50 shopping centers, mainly in Texas. On further question, he said they have no time table, it will depend on available financing. No one was present in opposition to request. Mr. Ellison stated that property consists of 112.88 acres, approximately 6U acres on west side of Loop 288 and 52 acres on the east side of Loop 288, current use is predominantly vacant and agricultural with one single family residence. He stated that petitioner consulted staff and designed an attrac- tive plan generally consistent with Development Guide, that the proposed collector street conforms to the thoroughfare plan. He said other streets will he required when property is subdivided for residential development; adequate electrical, water and sower service is .available for extension at cost of developer. lie continued that property is in a moderate in- tdnsity area, which areas are difficult to evaluate; that key is to keep intensity at an acceptable level so that it does not become a high intensity area. He said Development Guide suggests limiting a moderate intensity center to 30 acres; however, if there is diverse development, a bonus for size can be granted. Ile said staff feels this particular plan would qualify for the bonus. lie explained the policy relative to a size bonus is to look at center at the end of five years; and, Minutes Planning and Zoning commission September 29, 1982 Page 3 if only a retail area is developed with no residential uses developed, then the proposal can be reconsidered by Planning and Zoning Commission as a candidate for back-zoning. He said plan would be more acceptable if retail area was scaled down to a maximum of 10 acres and some office type zoning proposed. Chairman stated that he felt proposal should be approached from standpoint of whether it is the right land use for th" area. Mr. Watkins explained that petitioner is requesting 15 acres of retail use, that approximately 15 acres of retail use exists in the area at the present time. He said that if pro- posal did not include this mixture of housing and retail, staff would not be recommending approval of this rauch retail. Mr. Ellison continued that intensity analysis of area shows that, with this development, area is at 86 percent capacity; that when future requests are made in the area, a close look at intensity will be necessary. He advised that 620 trips are reserved for future development of vacant land. He said that townhouses will act as a buffer between Loop 288 and detached single family residential, chat suggested density of 10 units per acre and suggested screening is acceptable to petitioner. Multi-family development of 22 unity per acre, allowing upp to 767 units, is acceptable as Development Guide recommends be- tween 50U and 1000 multi-family units. lie said that proposed greenbelt and open space will help dilute the effect of mass concentration of apartments and it is hoped that developers will utilize that open space for recreational areas. He con- cluded that staff feels this is a good plan, that it has an overall rating between slightly acceptable and acceptable, and staff recommends approval subject to conditions including spe- cific site plan approval, screening, and p_ootection of exist- ing single family residence which would be engulfed by this development. Commissioners discussed impact of development on Loop 288 and McKinney Street traffic. on question, Mr. Edwards said that Loop 288 can accommodate two more lanes, that it is wide enough but there is no provision for a grade separation at Loop 288 and McKinney. on further question, he said that right-of-way exists to allow expansion of McKinney to four lanes. Minu to s Planning and Zoning Commission September 29, 1982 Page 4 Mr. Claiborne expressed concern about other properties in area that might want retail zoning in the future and Mr. Watkins said that any.further requests for retail zoning would have to be reviewed very carefully as capacity, as specified in the Guide, is being rapidly approached. Ms. Gilchrist questioned type of screening stating she felt thew should be an option of either a living screen or a solid e masonry wall abutting existing single family house. Mr. Deal said it is their feeling that proposed plan is best and highest use for the land, that he is aware of and in agreement with conditions recommended by staff. He urged approval of the request. The owner of the single family residence within the area spoke from audience asking about possibility of rezoning that prop- erty. Chair declared public hearing closed. Ms. Gilchrist moved to recommend approval of Z-1540 subject to the following conditions: 1. Land uses within the planned development are restricted to the uses specifically designated on the general concept plan; specific site plan approval must be granted before development occurs within the designated land use areas. 2. Specific development pr6posals shall conform to City of Denton requirements regarding zoning use classifications, subdivision regulations, building codes and any other codes related to development. 3. Density in multi-family areas shall be limited to 22 units per acre, 4. Density in single family attached areas shall be limited to 10 units per acre. 5. Residential streets, in accordance with City of Denton standards, shall be provided for internal circulation. 6. A living screen or a six (6) foot masonry wall must be erected between the 10.18 acre retail area at the south- west corner of loop 288 and East McKinney and the single family attached area beginning at its southern boundary when the general retail area is developed. Minutes Manning and Zoning Commission September 29, 1982 Page 5 7. Adequate screening consisting of a living screen or a six (6) foot solid masonry wall shall be erected along any property line where general retail abuts :ow density sin- gle family residential housing in existence at the time this property is zoned planned development. 8. Any land use permitted in the general retail (GR) classi- fication of the zoning ordinance slay be developed in the areas designated as general retail without amendment of the planned development (PD) ordinance. 9. If the development plans are not realized within five (5) years so that actual development includes some residential and is not limited to general retail, the planned develop- ment will be re-evaluated and considered a candidate for possible back-zoning to a smaller size center. Seconded by Mr. Sidor. Discussion followed about desirability of looking at proposal after five years as a passible candidate for back-zoning. Vote was called and motion carried unanimously. (7.0) 111. Considerations A. Approval of the final plat of lot 1, block 1, B. P. Price Addition. Mr. Ellison advised that several people were present and had asked to address the Commission regarding this plat which is a one lot subdivision consisting of 1.333 acres. The property is zoned agricultural (A) and proposed devel- opment is a single family "Jim Wa'.tors" home. The prop- erty was annexed ten to fifteen years ago. Mr. Ellison said that two separate issues are involved. When pliat was considered by development Review Committee, it was discovered that Riney Road had never been dedicated as a public road, therefore, one of requirements was that petitioner deed 3U feet of right-of-way for Riney Road. Petitioner informed staff this was impossible as he did not own property to centerline of Riney Road; that pre- vious owner had owned property for 30 years and did not own property to centerline of Riney Road. City Attorney's office was consulted and it was their opinion that since road has been used for a number of years it is a public I No. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE z04iNG mw OF 'riiL CITY oe DENPO:i, 'rEXAS,. AS SAME WAS AD02TLD AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF r4C CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,. .3Y ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND A3 SAIU HAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 112.68 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF TdE M.E.P.. i P.R.R. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 9271 THE M. L. AUSTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 4, AND THE M. YOACHA14 SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1442, DEMON COUNTY# TEXAS; AND MORE 7ARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEiL:I`t AND DECLARING AN EFFeCTIVE DATE. TdE COUNCIL OF TJE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,. HERESY ORDAINS2 SECTION I. The zoning Classification and Use des ignatLon of 0e following described property, to-wits All t"t certain tract or parcal of land situated in the I.E.P. 4.P.R.R.. Survey, Aimtract No. 927, Denton County, Texas, being part of the Second Tract of a deed conveyed by J. R. EArle, et ux to Delbert T. Cruze on April 18, 19411 recorded in volurse 290, Page 155, Deed Records of said County, a-.j beinq note particularly described as followa: B-GINNING at the southeast corner of the above described Second Tract in the center of the Caannel of Pecan Creek; THENCE west with the center line of Pecan Creek the following 5 courses and distancasi (1) north 840041 west 171.77 feet, )2) south 78050120" west 247.69 feet, (3) north 8308120" we%t 384,79 feet, (4) south 84037' west 298.1 feet and (5) south 71017' west 311.7 feet ti the east right of way of Loop 263; THENC3 north 1015' east with said east right of way 370.3 feet to a right of way post; TdENCO, north 1037' west 200.2 feet to a right of way post; THENCE north 1015' east with said east rig;it of way 1530.0 feet to a right of way post; THENCE north 55034' east with sail right ':f way 56.0 felt to a ::Gilt O: way ~J~.. .:n the E4Gt1 14:n: Of ZasC 1::a1R17fy-St:C3t; THENCS south 65025' east with said McKinney right of way 80.9 feet to a right of way post THENCE south 61037' east with said McKinney right of way 304.0 feet to a right of way post Td8NC8 south 62230' east with said right of way 56.0 feet to a fence cornatt THENCE south 21041'30" west 1'94.49 feet to a fence cornerr THENCt: south 6204G'40" east with a fence 467.5 feet to a fence corner; THEtICE north :9000140" eavt with a fence 191.0 feet to a fence corner on the south right of way of McKinney 9treetl TaENCS south 61051P east with said McKinney Streit right of way 458.6 feet to 9 right of way poatt 7ti il~cii t'~~ H. •hA. le'i'. THENCE soitheastecly with said McKinney. Street right of way an3 with a 3.6110 to the left 125.4 feet to a fence corner; THENCE south 1045' west with a fence 1320.0 feet to the place of beginning, and containing in all 52.351 acres of land. All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the M. L. Austin Survey,. Abstract No. 4, and the M. Yoacham Survey, Abstract No. 1442, Denton County, Texas, and being past of a First Tract described in a deed conveyed by J.. R.. Earle, et ux to Delbert T. Cruxe on April 180 1991, recorded in Volume 290, Page 155, and pact of a tract conveyed by C.. E. W311ace, et ux to Deb Cruze on July 12, 1944, recorded in Volume 306, Page 492, Deed Accords of Denton County, . Texas, and being more partt:;lail; le.;:ribed as foliwa: BEO&INNING at a fence corner on the south eight of way of East McKinney Road also being the north~-ast corner of the above described Wallace to Cruze tracts THENCE south 84020' east with said tight of way 485.0 feet to a corlecj THENCE south 66031'2.0" east 213.46 feet to a corner at the intarse:tlon of East McKinney and Loon 29aj THENC south 1015' west with the went right of way of Loop 285 a distance of 1573.0 feat to a right of way po3t; THENCd south 9047' west with said right of way 200.2 feet to a right of way post; TdENCr; south 1315' west with said right of way 393.7 feet to a corner in the canter of the Channel of Pecan Cree:) THENCi: westerly with the center of Pecan Creek the following courses and diitancesi (1) south d41341' west 399.05 feet, (2) south 74040' west 192.9 feat, (3) south 6005n' ,rest 391.2 feet, (4) north 45001' west 304.6; THENCL north 93057' west with a fence $10.0 feet to a fence corned THC:aCS' north 1059' east along and with a fence 992.0 feet to a fence corner on the south line of said Yoacham Survey; THENCE north 39053' east with a fence 975.1 feet to A fence corn3r) TKSVCE north 1035' east with a fence 1312.9 feet to the plr~-e of beginning and containing 60.528 a:res of land. is hsraby changed from Agrtcultucal "A' District Clasaificst(on Use to Planned Devylop.tent "PD" District Classification and Vs%? under the Compreh^nsivi Zoning Orlininae of th•: City of Denran, Te:<ss ;abJeat to the following conditions anJ restri:tion9 a,1,] Sits Plan attached hmr,+to to-wits 1. Lanj u:es within the planned devui.E!n~1t are re,3tcict-eJ to the uses specifical:/ iA31,grn3ted on t h a )enara1 ronc•lpt plan) specific site plan a,snro'!11 n:at ba gcant4d t'-.for? dove 1')prne'lt within the dasignntad land use areas; L-1540/WM0 H. DEAL-PAGli TWO 2. Specific development proposals shall conform to City of Denton requirements regarding zoning use classifications, subdivision regulations, building Codes and any other codes related to dsvelopmentr 3. Density in multt-family areas shall be limited to 22 units per acre; 4. Density in single-family attached areas shall be limited to 10 units per acrer 5. Residential streets in accordance with City of Denton standards shall be provided for internal circulation. 6. A living screen or a six (6) font masonry wall. nuat be iciztg1 bitwp2:i t`le 19.13 a,r] rita11 area at the southwest corner of Loop 288 and East Mcxinney Street and the single family attached area beginning at its southern boundary when the general retail area is developed; 7. Adequate screening consisting of a living screen or a six (61 foot solid irasonry wall shall be erected along any property line where general retail abuts low density single family residential housing when the general retail area is developed; 8. Any land use permitted in the general retail (OR) classification of the zoning ordinance may be developed in the areas designated so general retail without amendment of the planned development (PD) ordinance; 9. if the development plans are not realized within five (5) years so that actual development includes some r4sidential and is not limitd to general retail, the planned development will be re-evaluated and considered a candidate for possible back-zoning to a smaller size center. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 19691 as an Appendix to the Code of ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amendeA to show such change £n District Classification and Use. SECTION It. That the City Council of the City of Denton, T,?xa3, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable considaration, amonq other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar su£tab£1£ty or particular ussg, and with a view to conserving the vacua of the buildings, protectinq human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uaes of land for the maximum b!nefit to the City of Denton, Texas, ail ita ctttzans. SECTIO4 III. That this ordinance shall he in fall force aml eff.ec: Imme3tately attar its p333age and approval, th? requtceil puSlt.: hearings havfnq herat^fore been held by the Plsnntng in.l ^onfn' 2-1540/FRED H. bcAL-PA? TiiREE f 1 Commission and the City Council of tha City of D•?nt.m, Texas, after givlnq due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of OCto`.er, 1x87. RICPIARD O. STrWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DEN'TON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYt Ci.-. r / / nrAt.-F1rR Fni1Q 2-1540/FFFD If. SITE PLAN - 2-1540 !'E1ROpLEF ECUIThES EAST 41 GENERAL RETAIL DISTRlCt GENERAL ~ r, RETAIL fITF PLAN LAND USE STRICT ~Ir{ 61".c I+ 1. 0." 10.16 ac. In r I, 1...1.11 M1l 'I a. 'LAS J N'I} 0 ...s•. r..:. ..g. 1.47 ae. 1' ,r` 1N:' Iri FI 1Lµ{ FS~Ne5tf LIULTI-TAIILY S.rd l .5. +.1 DWELL NO DISTRICT ~j MULT1-FAMILY r.:+:rvr c ATTACAD DWELLING DISTRICT 1 DV:EL.IrIG DISTRICT .10.0 A0. v' . T _ 1e It I, 114-11"r.11 i.Iu 16.16 aC. t, 16.76 1C. •O1~ 5114M FAMILY DETACHED a itlll.tl-fAiIILY DMONC DISTRICT K` CWEtLINC DISiRIC 10.96 ac. MU7.41111 ~S i JNSTP~V ac.. g F DWEL.. r1,aY..lM1 foSil apl 1. l•Il I 9.89 me. S>rAWLY CNFO t 40.D4 00. ru 6tO.bS aa l . r . ; I. V ~i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 19, 1982 Subject: Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing con- cerning the proposed annexation of approxi- mately 63.89 acres of land located along the east side of Mayhill Road north of the Andrew Corporation; and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing. (Z-1541) (Public hearing in Council Chambers) Summary: The purpose of this ordinance is to set a date, time and place for the first public hearing regarding the proposed annexation of approximately 63.89 acres east of Mayhill Road. Action Required: publicyhearing~andmadopt thecordinanhe. Alternatives: 1. Adopt the ordinance 2. Table the ordinance for future action 3. Disapprove the ordinanceeg Recommendation: hThe earingfforeNo ember 9, 1982 ate7:0u01p.m in the Council Chambers. Exhibits: 1. Proposed Annexation Schedule 2. Ordinance 3. Notice of Public Hearing Charles Watkins Senior Planner PROPOSED ANNEXATION SCHEDULE October 110 1982 Submit Agenda Item October 13, 1982 Submit Backup * October 19, 1982 City Council adopt ordinance setting hearing dates October 20, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation October 21, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle October 24, 1982 Publish Ad for public hearing November 1, 1952 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 3, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) * November 9, 1982 Public hearing in Council Chambers November 10, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle November 14, 1982 Publish Ad November 22, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 24, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) November 29, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (I) a November 30, 1982 Public hearing in area December 1, 1982 Submit Backup (I) * December 7, 1982 Institute Proceedings December 8, 1982 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle December 12, 1982 Publish Ordinance January 10, 1983 Submit Agenda Item January 12, 1983 Submit Ba,.%up * January 18, 1983 Final action * City Council Action Required NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PIJICE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTPORI2ING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF Str-H PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of , 1982, at o'clock P.H. In the City Council Chamber of the Munic pa-l 9u lid ing of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a p~:b4tc hearing giving all intereat-~d cersons the riaht to anoasr and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: All that certain tract or ptreel of land lying and beinq situated in the County of Denton, Stets of Texas, and being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract Nt,. 1330 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly northwest corner of prnstnt city limits as established by Ordinance No. 79-38, said point lying in M.ayhill Road and in the west boundary line of the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, said point also being the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Andrew Corporation by deed dated. September 80 1978 and recorded in Volume 912, Page 804 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas= THENCE north 4013144" east along the west boundary line of said survey and in Mayhill Road a distance of 719.12 feet to a point, said point being the northwest corner of a tract conveyed to Andrew Corportion by deed recorded in Volume 912, Pa4e 821, site being the southwest corner o! a tract conveyed to Allan Mobile Homes, Inc, by deed recorded in volume 1161, Page 570 of the D!ed Records of Denton County, Texan; THENCE north 2025130" east along the west boundary line of said survey and to Mayhill Road, sane te£nq the west boundary lime of said Allan Tract, a distance 5f 1140.8 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the northwest corner of said Allen mcatt and the intersection of :aayhil: Road with the centerline of a County Road to the eastt { THENCE south 88029' east along the north boundary line of said E tract, said beina the centerline of County Road, a distance of 1489.1 feet to a point for a corner, said point beina tl%e northeast corner of said tracts THENCE south 2006' west alonq the east boundary line of said tract, same being the center of a County Road, a distance of 1154.4 feet to a point for a carver, said point being the southeast corner of said tr.actr THENCE north 91057'30" wext along tro south hound3rv line of sail tract 3 distance of 28.94 feet to 0 onint fnr a corner in laid County Road same being the northeast corn±r of said Andrew Tract; THENCE south 4034157" west along the east boundary line of !aid Andrew Tract a distance of 735.f4 feet to a point for a corer, sAiA point lying in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 18-391 ALLEN MOBILE HOMES, INC./AMDRF!4 CORPORATION-PA:E ONE THENCE north 87048156" west along the present city limits a distance of 1026.01 feet to a point; THENCE north 86009' west along the present city limits a. distance of 435.6 feet to the place of beginning and containing 63.89 acres of land, more or less. SECTION It. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is herebv authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be publishe9 once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the above described territorv not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, 211 i.t accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (article 970x, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED A.ND APPROVED this the day of , 1982. RICHARD O. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DF.NTOA, TEXAS ATTESTS CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR!: C. J. TAYLOR, JR. CITY t.TTORINEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: V ALLEPI MOBILE WIES, TYC./ANDREW CORPGRATi0^!-PAGE TWO NOTICE OF PtrsLIC HFAg19C, ON COMTTk!PLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being cart of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly northwest corner of present city omits as established by ordinance No. said point lvinc 11i'/hill Road and in the west boundary line of t`z G. VW-: Survey, Abstract No. 1330, said point also heinq the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Andrew Corporation by deed dated September 8, 1978 and recorded in Voluve 912, Page 804 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 4013144" east along the west boundarv line of said survey and in Mayhiil Road r distance of 719.12 feet to a point, said point being the northwes': corner of a tract_ conveved to Andrew Corpnrtion by deed recorded in Volume 912. Page 821. scree being the southwest corner of a tr+ct conveved to Allan Mobile Fomes, Inc. by deed recorded in Vo'.uae 1151, Pace 570 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 2025130" east alonq the west boundary line of said survey and in Mayhill Road, same being the west boundary lire of said Allan Tract, a distance of 1140.8 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the northwest corner of sal; Allan Tract and the intersection of Mayhill Road with the centerline of a County Road to the east; THENCE south 88029' east along the north boundarv line of said tract, said being the centerline of Countv Road, a distance ^,F. 1489.1 feet to a point for a corner, said point beinc t*.e northeast corner of said tract; ?HENCE south 2105' west alrnq the east boundary tine of said tract, same heinq the certor of a Countv pond, a distance cf 1154.4 feet to a point for a corner, said point being th.z southeast corner of said tract; THENCE north 87057130" vest along the south boun(larv line of said tract a distance of 29.94 feet to a ooint for a corner in said County P.oad same being the northeast corner of said An`'rew Tract; THENCE south 4034157" west alone the east_ boundary line of said Andrew Tract a distance of 735.54 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the present city iin its as established by Ordinance No. 78-38; THENCE north ?7149159" wa st aloha t"e pros?'1t city limits a rllstance of 11715.01, feet to ] ?nin'.; 7H:'1CE ncrti 3-109' west along tie nreennt city Iin it a distance r.f 435.5 feat to t1- rl--tc- of teitnnirnu and contai-ing 53.99 acres of land, more or foss. NOTtCE/ALLEN MOBILE NOWES, tt1_./ArrDF,fl' CORPORA"'rO:o'.5 A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1982, at o'clock P. M. in the Citv Council Chamber of the Munic pa 8u ldinq of the Citv of Penton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above orcposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall havo the right to aopear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all aeraons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY `:')72CE/A1 ;rN YOBIU NO'!ES, U+C./At:DRE'.' CORPORA^IO?'-P.A!'E 111"40 1B CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 19, 1982 Subject: Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing con- cerning the proposed annexation of approxi- mately 63.89 acres of land located along the east side of Mayhill Road north of the Andrew Corporation; and authorizing and directing, the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing. (Z-1541) (Public hearing in the area) Summary: The purpose of this ordinance is to set a date, time and place for the second public hearing to be held in the area proposed for annexation. Action Required: public Specify a ate, time and place for the Alternatives: 1. Adopt the ordinance 2. Table the ordinance 3. Disapprove the ordinance Recommendation: The staff recommends setting the public hearing for November 30, 1982 at 4:00 p.m. along the east side of Mayhill Road approx- imately 250 feet south of the intersection of Page Road and Mayhill Road. Exhibits: 1. Proposed Annexation Schedule 2. Ordinance 3. Notice of Public Hearing Charles Watkins Senior Planner PROPOSED ANNEYATION SCHEDULE October 11, 1982 Submit Agenda Item October 13, 1982 Submit Backup October 19, ?_982 City Council adopt ordinance setting hearing dates October 20, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation October 21, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle October 24, 1982 Publish Ad for public hearing t:overnber 1, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 3, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) November 9, 1982 Public hearing in Council Chambers November 10, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle November 14, 1982 Publish Ad November 22, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 24, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) November 29, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (I) November 30, 1982 Public hearing in area December 1, 1982 Submit Backup (I) December 7, 1982 Institute Proceedings December 8, 1982 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle _December 120 1982 Publish Ordinance January 10, 1983 Submit Agenda Item January 12, 1983 Submit Backup January 18, 1983 Final action City Council Action Required NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE 014 THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of 1982, at o'clock on the east side of Mayhill Road approximately 250 feet south of the intersection of Mayhill Road and Paqe Road, the City Council +_i hold a public heacino givin^ all interest-0 oer%ons the 11 right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-vit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly northwest corner of present city limits as established by ordinance No. 76-38, said point tying in Mayhill Road and to the west boundary line of the G. walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, said point also being the southwest corner of a tra.:t of land conveyed to Andrew Corporation by deed dated September 8, 1978 and recorded in Volume 912, Page 804 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 4013144" east along the west boundary line of said survey and in %sayhill Road a distance of 710.12 feet to a point, said point being the northwest corner of a tract conveyed to Andrew Corportion by deed cecordee in volume 912, Page 821, same beinq the southwest corner of a tract conveyed to Allan Mobile Hones, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 1151, Paqe 570 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 2025130" east along the west boun-lacy line of said survey and in :•!avhill Poa~, same h?inq the west houniarv line of said Allan Tract, a distance of lIA0.8 feet to a point for a corner, said coint being the northwest corner of said Allan Tract anal the intersection of Hayhill Road with the centerline of a County Road to the east; THENCE south 880291 east alono the north boundary line of said tract, said being the centerline of County Road, a distance of 1489.1 feet to a point for a c,)rner, said point being the northeast corner of said tract; THENCE south 2006' west along the east boundary line of said tract, same being the center of a County Road, a d(Atance of 1154.4 feet to a point for a corner, said ooint being the southeast corner of said tract; THSti"5 north 870,7130" wost along the soli") houn!4ary Lire of tract a I' m-tance 01 18.91 feet tn a n0f n`. f- 3 corner in -41:1 count", ROd'i sa7q i)?in!] th° no'th4,lst of n3i9 An. rew ~r3:. :Hr`,CL' sovUth 41"14'17" west alonq the east b,lurnrl+r': lin- of Safi Ac!riw Tract a dist3nca of 735.64 faet to n o,,fnt f .~r a cornet, s+i, Doint l my in the present city limits 3s establiO'Ad by 0 -3inance NO. 78-391 ALLEN M49IL8 HOMES, INC./ANDREW CORPORATION-PA6F. ONE THENCE north 870481560 west along the present city limits a distance of 1026.01 feet to a point= THENCE north 86009' west along the present city limits a distance of 435.6 feet to the place of beginning and containing 63.89 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper having gereral circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all In accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of . 1982. RICHARD 0.-STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON,.TEXAS ATTESTt CY.ARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY ClrY OF DZWON,- TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM- C. . J.. TAYLOR,. JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS by: i f ALLEN MOBILE HO:ScS, INC./ANDREW CORPORATION-PAGE 7io i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THATs The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and beirta situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly northwest corner of ores+nt cf-.° limits as established by Ordinance No. 78-38, said point lvina In Mayhill Road and in the west boundary line of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330, said point also being the southwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Andrew Corporation by deed dated September 8, 1978 and recorded in Volume 912, Page 804 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 4013144" east along the west boundary line of said survey and in Mayhill Road a distance of 719.12 feet to a point, said point being the northwest corner of a tract conveyed to Andrew Corportion by deed recorded in Volume 412, Page 821, same being the southwest corner of a tract conveyed to Allan Mobile Homes, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 1161, Page 570 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; 1 THENCE north 2025130" east along the west boundary lint of said survey and In Mayhill Road, sane being the west boundary line of said Allan Tract, a distance of 1140.8 feet to a ooint for a corner, said point being the northwest corner of said Allan Tract and the intersection of Mayhill Road with the centerline of a County Road to the eastl THENCE south 88029' east along the north boundary line of said tract, said being the centerline of County Road, a distance .f 1489.1 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the northeast corner of said tract: THENCE south 2006' west along the east boundary line of said tract, same being the center of a County Road, a distance of 1154.4 feet to a point for a corner, said point beinq t'e southeast corner of said tract; THENCE north 87057130" west along the south boundary line of said tract a distance of 28.94 feet to a ooint for a corner in said County Road sane being the northeast corner of said Andrew Tract; THENCE south 4034157" west along the east boundary lire of said Andrew Tract a distance of 735.64 feet to a point for a corner, said ooint lving in the present city iimlt4 as established by Ordinance lag. THENCE north 87048'x6" west along th-i present city limfta a distance of 1026,01 feet to a oointt THENCE north 86009' west alonq the present city limits a distance of 435.6 feet to the place of teginning and ccntainina 63.89 acres of land, more or less. NOTICE/ALLEN MOBILE HOMES, INC./ANDREW COPPORATION-PAGE ONE A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1992, at o'clock on the east side of Mayhill Road approximately 250 feet south of the intersection of Mavhill Road and Page Road, for all persons interested in the above vroposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RICHARD T A T, MAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST. CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY NOTICE/ALLEN MOBILE HOMES, Mr./ANDREW CORPOP.ATION-PAGE rao V '007 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Date; October 19, 1982 Subject: Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing con- cerning the proposed annexation of approxi- mately 111.72 acres of land located along either side of FM 1830 beginning approxi- mately 200 feet south of Hobson Lane; and authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing. Z-1542 (Public hearing in Council Chambers) Summary: The purpose of the ordinance to set a date, time and place for the first public hearing regarding annexation of approximately 111.72 acres on both sides of FM 1830. Action Required: Specify date, time and place for public hearing and adopt ordinance. Alternatives: 1. Adopt the ordinance 2. Table the ordinance 3. Disapprove the ordinance Recommendation: The staff recommends holding the public hearing on November 9, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Exhibits: 1. Proposed Annexation Schedule 2. Ordinance 3. Notice of. Public Hearing Charles Watkins Senior Planner PROPOSED ANNEXATION SCHEDULE October 11, 1982 Submit Agenda Item October 13, 1982 Submit Backup October 19, 1982 City Council adopt ordinance setting hearing dates October 202 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation October 21, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle October 24, 1982 Publish Ad for public hearing November 10 1982 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 3, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) November 9, 1982 Public hearing in Council Chambers November 10, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle November 14, 1982 Publish Ad November 220 1982 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 24, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) November 29, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (I) November 30, 1982 Public hearing in area December 1, 1982 Submit Backup (I) December 7, 1982 Institute Proceedings December 8, 1982 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle December 12, 1982 Publish Ordinance January 10, 1983 Submit Agenda Item January 12, 1983 Submit Backup January 18, 1983 Final action City Council Action Required s NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE, PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of , 1982, at o'clock P.M. in the City Council Chamber of the Municipal Eui'_d- ing of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearin.a givinq 311 interestsl persons the right to aDCear and ba heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lyinq and beina situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 900 and the B.A.R. 6 C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 199 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said paint lying in the west right of way line of F.M. V 1830, said point also- being the northeast corner of the land as described in A.nnexaticz Ordinance No. 01-79; THENCE south 89013' west along the present city limits a distance of 1074.6 feet to a point for a corner, same being the intersection of the land as describe9 in Annexation Ordinance No. 60-40 with the land as descrih?d in Annexation Ordinance N7. 81-79: THENCE northeasterly along the present city limits, an aoproxi- mate distance of 1989.23 feet to a point for a corner= THENCE east along the present city limits an approximate distance of 2404.22 feet to a point for a corner, same beira the north- west corner of the land as describe ed in Annexation 17dinanee *a. 74-5: THENCE south 0007140" west along the present city limits a distance of 1231 feet to a point same being the southwest cotter of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 74-6 and the northwest corner of the land as degcrlhed in Annexatfon Ordinance No. 79-611 THENCE south 0007'43" west along the present city limits an approximate distance of 350 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 80-12; THENCE south 91034146" west 31onq the er?sent city limita a dlstance of 2916.16 feet to a onint for a cnrnec, Raid ck)int lvinq in the east right of way line of F.+1. 1810; THER117F, s0vth 1019' east along the ore,nnt city limits inl the 4x3t 'fight of way ling of F.%!. IR31, a rlistnnce of 41.111 faeh7 THV7CE south 89045'35" west a dist3rre of 40 feet to a mint for a corner, said point lvinq in the centerline of F.M. 1830; THFv_E south 0054140" east alnnq the rerntncline of F.!'. 19}(3 an approxiate distance of 355 feet to 3 point for a corner, sa:,e COUNTRY CLU3 ROAD/F.:1. 1830-PALE ONE 1 being the easterly northeast corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-791 THENCE north 89051' west along the present city limits a distance of 40 feet to a point for a corners THENCE north 0054140" west along the present city limits a distance of 576.42 feet to the place of beginning and containing 111.72 acres of land, more or less. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Genron, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation In the City and in the above described territory not 1r+.ore than forty days ror less than twenty days Prior to the date of such Public hearing, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED &ND APPPOVED this the day of . 1982. RICHARD O. STEWART, MAYO_n. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECPETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEN-10-4, TEXAS SYe COUNTP.Y CLUB POAD/F.M. 1830-PAGE WO , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton. Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City di Denton, to-wits All that certain tot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and boina part of the T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 900 and the B.B.n. 5 C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 106 and being more particularly described as followst BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point lying in the west right of way line of F.N. 1930, said ooint also being the northeast corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-79; THENCE south 89013' west along the present city limits a distance of 1079.6 feet to a point for a corner, same being the intersection of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 50-40 with the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-791 THENCE northeasterly along the present city limits, an approximate distance of 1989.23 feet to a point for a cornert THENCE east along the present city limits an aooroxinnate distance of 2404.22 feet to a point for a cor•:<r, same beinq the northwest corner of the land as described in A nexation Ordinance No. 74.6; THENCE south 0007140" west along the present city limits a distance of 1231 feet to a point same being t;,t4 southwest corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 74-6 and the northwest corner of the land as desc,O ee in Annexation Ordinance No. 19-51t , THENCE south C007'43" vest along the present city limits an approximate distance of 3S0 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner of t'ie tand as 145critel in Annexation Ordinance No. 90-12; THENCE south 89034146" west :.long the present .ity limits a distance of 2616.76 feet to a point fnr a corner, said point lying in the east right of way line of F.M. 1830] THE`1CE south 1011' east Ilona the present city limits and the east right of way line of F.M. 18301 a distance of 40.01 feet; THENCE south 39046'35" west a distance of 40 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the centerline of F.M. 1830; T.RFNCE south 0054140" east alnno the centerline of F.'d. 183r an aroroxiate distance of 355 feet to a point for a corner, sece h,iing the e3sterty northeast corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance N-. 91-19; WNCE north 89053' west alono the present city limits a distance of 40 feet to a point for a corner; TABNCE north 0054140" west along the present city limits a distance of 574.42 feet to the placa of beginnfnq and containing 111.72 acres of 16nd, pore or less. NOTICE/COUNTRY CLUS 10A0/F.1-!. 1830-PA^5 ONE • e A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City council of the Ciiy Of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1982, at o'clock P. M. In the City Council Chamfer of the Municilsa Bu lding of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said tim-, and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be keard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. CI" OF D£NTOK, TEXAS ATTESTS CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY NOTICE/COUNTPY C%UB ROAD/F.M. 1930-PAGE MI) ID CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Date: October 19, 1982 Subject: Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for a public hearing con- cerning the proposed annexation of approxi- mately 111.72 acres of land located along either side of FM 1830 beginning approxi- mately 200 feet south of Hobson Lane; anL authorizing and directing the Mayor to publish notice of such public hearing. Z 1542 (Public hearing in area) Summary: The purpose of the ordinance is to set a date, time and place for the second public hearing regarding the annexation of approx- imately 111.72 acres. This public hearing must be held in the area proposed for annexation. Action Required: Specify date, time and place for the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. Alternatives: 1. Adopt the ordinance 2. Table the ordinance 3. Disapprove the ordinance Recommendation: The staff recommends holding the public hearing on November 30, 1982 at 4:30 p.c.. along the west side of FM 1830 adjacent to a wooden fence located approximately 1,350 feet south of the intersection of Hobson Lane and FM 1830. Exhibits: 1. Proposed Annexation Schedule 2. Ordinance 3. Notice of Public Hearing oL t, Charles Watkins Senior Planner PROPOSED ANNEXATION SCHEDULE October 11, 1982 Submit Agenda Item October 13, 1982 Submit Backup z' October 19, 1982 City Council adopt ordinance setting hearing dates October 201 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation October 21, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle October 24, 1982 Publish Ad for public hearing November 10 1982 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 3, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) * November 9, 1982 Public hearing in Council Chambers November 10, 1982 Deliver Ad to Denton Record Chronicle November 14, 1982 Publish Ad November 22, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (public hearing) November 24, 1982 Submit Backup (public hearing) November 29, 1982 Submit Agenda Item (I) * November 30, 1982 Public hearing in area December 1, 1982 Submit Backup (I) * December 7, 1982 Institute Proceedings December 8, 1982 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle December 120 1982 Publish Ordinance January 10, 1983 Submit Agenda Item January 12, 1983 Submit Backup January 18, 1983 final action * City Council Action Required NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON TH6 PROPO;FD ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, IND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D%NTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. on the day of , 19820 at o'clock along the west side of F.M. 1830 (Country Club Road) adjacent to a wooden fence located approximately 1350 feet south of the intersection of Hobson Lane and F.M. 1.830, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wits All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State Of Texas, and being part of the T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 900 and the B.H.A. i C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 196 and being mote particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point lying in the west tight cf way line of F.M. 1834, said point also being the northeast corner the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-79; THENCE south 89013' west along the present city limits a distance of 1079.6 feet to a point for a corner, sane being the intersection of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 60-40 with the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-791 THENCE northeasterly along the present city limits, an a0croxi- mate distance of 1989.23 feet to a point for a corners THENCE east along the present city limits an approximate distance of 2404.22 feet to a point for a corner, same beinc the northwest corner of the lanai as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 14-4; THENCE south 0007140" west along the cresent city limits a distance of 1231 feet to a point same being the southwest Corner of the land as described in Annexation ordinance No. 74-5 and the northwest corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 79-61; THENCE south 0007143" west along the present city limits an approximate distance of 350 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 80-12; THENCE south 89014146" west alOnO the nresent city limits a distance of 2516.76 feet to a ooint for a corner, said point laying In the east right of way line of F.M. 1830; TmESCE south 1019' east along the present city Itmits and the east right of way line of F.M. 1830, a distance of 40.91 feett THENCE south 89046135" west a distance of 40 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the centerline of F.M. 1830; COUNTRY CLUB ROAD/F.M. 1830-PArE ONF E THENCE south 0054'40" east alonq the centerline of F.M. 1630 an approxiate distance of 355 feet to a point for a corner, same being the easterly northeast corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-19P THENCE north 0 o53' west along the present city limits a distance of 40 feet to a point for a corners THENCE north 00541400 west along the present city limits a distance of 514.42 feet to the place of beainnino and containing 111.72 acres of land, more or' less. SECTION IT. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of sach public hesrino to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the above described territorv not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such oublic hearing, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act 1Article 970x, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION In. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1482. RICHARD 0. STEHART, MAYOR CITY Oi DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: i CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS is V 8Y: e, k COUNTRY CLUB ROAD/F.M. 1830-PAGE TWO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERF.STEO PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wits All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lyina and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 900 and the B.A.B. i C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 195 and being more particularly described as follows: 1'vSINNING at a pot^.t in the present city limits, sait4 r%nint 1-•fna in the west right of wav line of F.M. 1830, said point also heina the northeast corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-191 THENCE south 89013' west along the present city limits a distance of 1079.6 feet to a point for a corner, same being the interse=lion of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 60-40 with the land as describers in Annexation Ordinance No. 81-79- THENCE northeasterly alonq the present city limits, an aocroxi- mate distance of 1989.23 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE east along the present city limits an approximate distance of 2404.22 feet to a point for a corner, same beinq the northwest corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 74-61 THENCE south 0007140" west alonq the present city limits a distance of 1231 feet to a point same being the southwest corner of the land as described in Annexation Ordinance ue. 74-6 and the northwest corner of the lane as described in Annexation Ordinance No. 19-61; THENCE south 0007143" west along the present city limits an approximate distance of 350 feet to a point for a corner, same being the northeast corner of the land as d?scribed in Annexation Ordinance No. 80-12; THENCE south 89034146" west alone the present city linits a distance of 2516.71; feet to a point for a corner, saih point lying in the east r{aht of wav line of F.M. 18301 THENCE south 1019' east along the present city limits and the east clght of way lino of F.M. 183n, a distance of 40.91 fe- t,- THENCE south 89046'35" west a distance of 40 feet to a mint for a corner, said point lying in the centerline of F.M. 1830; THENCE south 0054140` east along the centerline of F.11. IR30 an ;p"j rlr{ate. j{stance of 5L feet to a rooint for 3 corner, ra-'? hying tFe easterly northeast corner of the land as descci',5,A {n Annexation Ordinance No. 81-74; TVr,'Cr north 89053' west alona the present city I in" tg a distance of 40 feet to a point for a corners THE?:CE north 0054140" west along the present city limits a d°.atanee of 576.32 feet to the place of beainnfna any' 'Inatsininq 111.72 acres of land, more cc less. NOTICE/COUNTRY CLUB ROAD/P.M. 1930-PACE ONE A Public Hearing will be held by and before the Ctty Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1982, at o'clock along the west side of F.N. ).830 {Country C U Roa ) adjacent to a wooden fence located approxi- mately 1350 feet south of the intersection of Hobson Lane and F.M. 1830, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time aid place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. KICMAPD 0. R , MAYOR CITY 0° DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY I NOTICE/COUNTRY CLUB ROAD/F.-a. 1810-PAGE TWO CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEE'T'ING: October 19, 1982__ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of an ordianance approving the 1982 appraisal rolls as approved by the Appraisal Review Board of the Denton County Appraisal District. DESCRIPTION: The appraisal roll submitted to the City of Denton by the County Tax Appraisal District must be approved by ordinance. After approval of the appraisal roll, the City will prepare the tax levy and the tax statements. F?SCAL SU.%MARY: ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ; DENTON, TEXAS 76101 /TELEPHONE (817)566.8200 MEMORANDUM T0: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: William H. McNary, Director of Finance DATE: October 13, 1982 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE APPROVING THE 1982 APPRAISAL ROLL The ordinance approving the 1982 Appraisal Roll, as submitted to the City of Denton by the Denton County Appraisal District, is on the Agenda for October 19th. The approval of this roll is the final step prior to the City issuing its tax statements. The appraisal roll has been available for review by the City Council for the past week. There are a couple of items to note concerningg this roll. The roll does not include the exemptions approved by Council prior to implementing the budget. The City will incorporate those exemptions in the tax roll prior to issuing the tax statements. 0 The City staff has had an opportunity to thoroughly review the preliminary appraisal roll as we were transferring the City account numbers to the Appraisal District roil. Three part-time clerical people were hired, and each account was traced back to the City records. I will be happy to answer any questions about the tax appraisal roll. W'iFT~am~Ff: ~{c~`ary WHM:mr • t NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS, APPROVING THE 1482 APPRAISAL ROLLS AS APPROVED BY THE APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD OF THE DENTON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, HEREBY ORDAI4S: SECTION I. The 1982 Tax Assessment Rolls in the amount of $1,085,002,008 of the City of Denton, Texas as approved by the Aopraisal Review Board of the Denton County Appraisal District are hereby approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of October, 1982. RICHARD . STES ARMK 0 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ' ATTESTS r CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVEL AS TO LEGAL FORMS C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYs . 1 iD IF CITYofDENTON,TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / OENTON,TEXAS 7620I / TELEPHONE(817)566-8200 MEMORANDUM TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant DATE: October 13, 1982 sUBJECr. Disposal of Animal Carcasses During the recent budget hearings the city Council tentatively approved the establishrent cf a fee for the pickup and disposal of dead enimals from the local veterinarians. At that time it was estimated that such a fee would bring in an additional $5,000 in Animal Control fees which would be used to balance the general fund budget. At the last Council Meeting several questions were raised concerning the impact of these charges on residential pickup services and the level and cost of the services provided. During the last year the Animal Control Division made approximately 1,126 trips to local veterinarian's offices to pick up animal carcasses. It is estimated that this pickup and disposal service cost the City approximately $7,134 (1,126 trips x the average cost of pickup and disposal of $6.33). In addition, the Animal Control Division made approximately 247 trips to local residences for the same purpose at an estimated coat of $1,564. Should the demand for these services regain constant and thCouncil choose to implement a fee for both the local veterinarians and local residents, the City could expect to realize approximately $6,870 in additional revenues. In regards to the impact on residential pickup service the staff feels that there would be very little change in existing activities, should the Council adopt an ordinance which would establish a fee for both veterinarians and residents. It is our feeling that the majority of residents who experience a death of a pet usually bury the pet in their backyards. Those residents who do not wish to bother with such a problem will continue, to call the Animal Control Division for pickup and disposal services. In addition, the Denton Humane Society operates a pet cemetary at which local residents may provide a final resting place for their deceased pets at a norm naI chard. Disposal of Animal Carcasses October 13, 1962 Page 2 The staff is of the opinion that these fees are justified and are appropriate in that they will help to recover scree of the costs incurred in the provision of this service. Therefore, we would recorvend that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance which establishes a $5.00 fee for the pickup and disposal of animal carcasses fran both local veterinarians and residents. Respectfully Submitted, Bill Angelo BA/yg 115E a " l I NO. i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 4 Of THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OP DENTON PROVIDING FOR REGULATIONS AND FEES FOR DEAD ANIMAL PICKUP AND DISPOSALI PROHI9ITING DISPOSAL OF CARCASSES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY OR PROPERTY OF ANOTHER) PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION THEREOF) REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 0 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION 1. Article I of Chapter 4 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section 4-34 to read as followsi 'Section 4-34. Dead Animals) Pickup) Regulations end Fees. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to place, put or leave a dead animal upon a public place, street or right-of-way or upon property of another person without the other person's consent. (b) All veterinarians and residents shall be charged a fee of Five Dollars ($5.00) for each trip by city employees to pickup one or more dead animals. All dead animals shall be placed in a sealed plastic bag prior to pickup by city employees. Any veterinarian requesting pickup of a dead animal shall, in order to receive pickup service for animals weighing over thirty-fiv3 (35) pounds, provide lowing assistance to city employees at the time of pickup. (c) All veterinarians and residents bringing dead animals to the City's Animal Control facility shall be assessed and pay a Three Dollar ($3.00) disposal fee per trip prior to acceptance of the carcass(es) for disposal. (d) it shall be unlawful for any person to place or leave an sntm al carcass at the City's Animal Control Center except at times when such Center is open to the ppuublic and a city employee is available to receive such carcr.ss," I SECTION it, i That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a am not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00)) and each day and every day that the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in addition to PAGE 1 k r i and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be available at law ani equity. SECTION III. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance ' become effe:tive which are inconsistent or in conflict with the tf.ras or Provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Re,,ord-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) di.ys of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of October, 1992. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTt VICKI WESTLING, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYt PAGE 2 + CITY OF DENTON ' MEMORANDUM TO: u. Chris Hartung FROM: Rick Svehla DATE: October 13, 1982 SUBJECT: Disposition of property at Frame and Mingo At prior Council meetings, the Council approved the disposition of the land shown on the attached drawing. The land was bid as per the Council's formal procedure for disposing of excess land. the highest bid was that of the first State Bank Trust Department for $4,6UU.00. This resolution would allow the Mayor to sign a quit claim deed transferring the ownership of the property to the First State Bank Trust Department. If you or the Council have any further questions, please call. Kick bve la 27 YIP %a li i 6 a 6 - - 20 12 E 7 7Ja d 19 is 17 A Is 17 n IS 143 a ~~~/I7 i1 I M w w N .,a SCHMITZ I L N q q q / H N W W fO y i L0~ I t 9 11. w, tl d 7 6 S 4 3 2 It t 2 3 4 3 6 7 6 9 00 11* IZ P~ a 14 2 48 Q`O < ~ Q 7 22 364 r ~9 10 II 12 13 14 1 S I6~I4 IS 16 17 to 19 21 ' 6 S O~• 1 `1 a s n Io to r 4 4 12 1. I C 6 d 7 61 S 4 3 2 1i I 23~ 3 11 172` \ 3 49 7 y iS0 r~ G~V b pill I Iwo 9 t f v~ ~I ' a 12 d > 10 12 14 P 7 II 10 9 II a tX WITHERS I71 7 d 4 n u « '►doptll olsposmom d f6 = I 11 y 3 • 2l- 3 `3 2 3 4 16 ~ 4 7 l 2 _ 13 I51 s !5 nl► 91. ~ PAISLEY t • H ii/! IOM {OM 14 a A d1 29 4 + 13 7 F A 2 - 1 ll 2 21 , = l .2 + 3 ,N !1 i i I 12 r d a 28 •K i.l 9 153 L 384La - 4 rs 3 "1--rtfr ~I 11 10 21 / ~nlf no../ CONGRESS a -1.,. r 20 ° 262 S ! r.$$ 3 a ,2, 26 166 t67~ is I I ~ itir A 21 3 t 24► A 4 17 i 20 a 23 71 e} 16 4 9 a.' a 22 301 30 2 A 1S 41 19 15 S 10 r f r' / I A oil A. ! 21 11 6 I a $302 303 12 A 32 BANNER 20 'i ► w 'r N A 31 O I I A 30 f~y 229L R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has hereto- _ fore determined the necessity for disposing o: the real property hereinafter describeds and WHEREAS, after due notice as required by law, competitive bids were received by the City of Dentosnt and WHEREAS, the highest bid received was for Four Thousand Six Hundred (S4,600.00) Dollars, from First State Bank Trust Department of Dentont and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the reasonable and fair market value of such property is Four Thousand Six Hundred ($4,600.00) Dollarst NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TE%ASs SECTION I, The bid for Four Thousand Six Hundred (54,600.00) Dollars by First State Bank Trust Department of Denton is hereby accented. SECTION 11. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Denton, Texas a quitclaim deed conveying the hereinafter described property to First State Bank Trust Department of Denton, to-wits All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the B.B.B. 6 C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 1850 Denton County, Texas, being a part of Lots 15 and 16, Block D, of the Schmitz 6 Ripy Addition to the City of Denton, Texas, per plat recorded in Volume 85, Page 270, Deed Records of said County and being more fully described as followss BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Lot 16, Block D in the west right of way line of Frame Streets THENCE south along the said right of way a distance of 73.62 feet to an iron pint THENCE south 51026157" west a distance of 59.10 feet to an iron pint THENCE with a curve to the left, having a central angle of 7023146', and a radius of 578.8937 feet, a chord which bears south 47045'04" west a distance of 74.675 feet, an are length of 74.727 feet, to an iron pin situated in the west line of said Lot 15, Block Ds r E THENCE north a distance of 160.53 feet to an iron pint THENCE north 89055136" east a distance of 101.50 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.268 acres of land, more or less. SECTION III. The City of Denton is hereby authorized to pay its share of the necees3cy and reasonable cost of closing as required by the advertisement for bid. i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of October, 1982. RICHARD 0. STEWART# MAYOR CITY OF DENTON ATTESTI CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS C. J. TAYLORr JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS BYt , "W-at'" tutx V120-WW einrl% 1.h, .nt wiles e.cuw% Aet,..t.b.wft IrA kRN lriwwt ae. Ddr - ; THE STATE OF TEXAS, KNOW KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. COUN"rY OF DENTON That the City cf Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Denton and State of Texas , for and Ia coneId*rsUon of the sum of ---Four Thousand Six Hundred and No/100 (51,600.001----------- DOLLARS. to it In band paid by First State Bank of Denton Trust Department of tbs Count- of Denton and State of Texas , the recelpt of whkh s is hereby acknowledges, do, by these presents, BARGAIN, SELL, RELEASE, AND FOREVER Q= CLADi unto the said First State Bank of Denton Trust Department, its successors bab=nd assigm, all its right title and Interest in and to that certain tract or par. eel of land lying in the County of Denton and State of Texas, described as follows, towit : All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the B.S.B, 6 C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 185, Denton County, Texas, being a part of Lots 15 and 16, Block D, of the Schmitt i Ripy Addition to the City of Denton, Texas, per plat recorded in volume 850 Page 270, Deed Records of said County and being more fully described as follower BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Lot 16, Block D in the west right of way line of frame Street# THENCE south along the said right of way a distance of 73.62 feet to an iron pint THENCE south 51026157" west s distance of 59.10 feet to an iron pint THENCE with a curve to the left, having 3 central angle of 70231461, and a radius of 578.8937 feet, a chord which bears south 47045'044 west a distance of 74.675 feet, an arc length of 74.727 feet, to an iron pin situated in the west line of said Lot 15, Block Di THENCE north a distance of 160.53 faet to an Iron pint THENCE north 890551364 east a distance of 101.50 fect to the point of beginning and containing 0.268 acres of land, more or less. TO HAVE A-YD TO HOLD the said premises, together with all and singular the rights, privi• leges and appurtenances thereto in any manner belonging unto the Bald First State Bank of Denton Trust Department, its successors xbWas and assigns, forever, so that neither the said City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation, its successors nor k81x*xernny person or persons claiming under it shall, at any time hereafter, have, claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid premises or appurtenances, or any part there. Df. WUNESS my hand at Denton, Texas this day of October A. D. 1982 Witnesses at Request of Grantor: S'1Y-DE-DENT0Y,__TEXAS__. ATTEST: RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF UL'NTUN MLMURANDUM '1'0: G. Chris Hartung FRUAI: Rick Svel•la DATE: October 13, 1982 SUBJECT: Resolution naming the streets to be considered for the December 11 Bond Election Attached is a resolution naming all the streets on the 'ist that the Council approved at their October 12 meeting. At that meeting, the Council also asked for a cost and the distress ratings for Acme Street from Ft. Worth Drive to Bernard, Willowwood from Bernard to McCormick and Hickory from hood to Crawford. The cost for these three streets and their distress points are as follows: Construction Distress Costs Points 1. Acme from Ft. Worth Drive to Bernard R-$35,000 94 2. Willowwood from McCormick to Westwood 17 Westwood to Leslie 31 Leslie to Bernard 33 (By our ranking system, this street requires only minor maintenance, i.e. seal coating, crack scaling, etc. which would done out of the regular Street Division operating funds.) 3. Hickory from Wood to Crawford 32 (This street also needs normal maintenance, such as crack sealing, seal coating, or some minor patching and would be taken care of with regular Street Division funds.) If the Council desires to include any of these for the election oil December 110 they would need to be added to the resolution. i'lhe City Attorney has advised that the Council could do this during the meeting and make any appropriate changes, as they desire. If you or tae Cuuncil have any further questions, please call. r Rick a an RIV R E S 0 L V T I 0 N WHEREAS; the City of Denton, Texas, acting through its elected city officials and pursuant to its capital improvement } program intends to call a bond election in 1482 to finance { certain capital improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to make known in advance of the calling of said bond election what street improvements are proposed to be financed and made as a result of such bond election] NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R4SOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONs SECTION I. That if the citizens should duly approve the selling of bonds to finance the street improvements submitted at such election in 1111, it is the intent of the City of Denton to make needed improvements to the following streets within the City of Dentoni STREET NAME FROM TO ?,ocust Eagle University Bell University Sherman Elm University Eagle Oak Bolivar Jagoe Hickory Cedar Austin Hickory Avenue C Welch Hickory Carroll Cedar Locust Sherman Orr Avenue A Highland McCormick Congress Oakland Ponder Mingo Withers Mockingbird Oak Austin . Bolivar Hickory Austin RR Oak RR Austin Bonnie Brae Windsor University Audra McKinney End of Divide Nottingham University Windsor Welch Eagle Highland Welch Mulberry Hickory Welch Hickory Oa'. Bernard Hickory Eagle West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe West Oak in-is Y Sunset Anna Carroll Sunset Carroll University Oriole Mockingbird Cardinal Glenwood Windsor University Greenwood Laurel wood Cherrywood Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman Fry Scripture Hickory Bernard willowwood iH-3S Westway Bolivar Fulton Mistywood Nottingham Woodhaven Mistywood Woodhaven Robinwood r t~ STREET NAME FROM TO Alice Congress University e Denison Sherman University. TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS $8.131,500 SECTION II. That if the citizens should duly approve the selling of bonds to finance the capital improvements program submitted at such election in 19820 it is the intent of the City of Denton to make needed improvements to the following within the City of Dentoni CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Ponder Street Drainage Panhandle Drainage from Alice to Malone Signal Improvements Equipment Acquisition for Neighborhood Parks Sell, Coronado Drainage i Ac uisition of right-of-way for U. S. 380 Paisley Street Drainage Stanley, Thomas, Ector Drainage (Parts I and II) Prairie Drainage (Bradshaw to iakey) Yellowstone, Sheraton Drainage Handicapped improvements at the Square Equipment/Land Acquisition for Parks Update Signal Equipment City Contribution to Reconstruct U.S. 380 Equiptent/Land Acquisition for Parks Fire Substation Equipment/Land Acquisition for Parks Building Renovation/Expansion TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 55.110,000 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of October, 1982. RICHARD 0, STEWARTo KA CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTS , I RI WESTLING, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY 1 ~ i PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 161pl, FUNDING SCHEDULE 1982 - 1983 Ponder Street Drainage $ 2083,000 Panhandle Drainage - Alice to Malone $ 6692000 Signal Improvements $ 100,000 Equipment Acquisition for Neighborhood Parks $ 681,000 bell, Coronado Drainage $ 269,000 Acquisition of R. 0. W. for U. S. 380 $ 2009000 Paisley Street Drainage $ 122,000 $ 1,636,000 1983 - 1984 Stanle/, Thomas, Ector Drainagt Parts I and II $ 1,124,000 1984 - 1985 Prairie (Bradshaw to Lakey) Drainage $ 166,000 Yellowstone, Sheraton Drainage ~ 724,000 Handic•,pped Improve.aents at the Square $ 500000 fiquipment/Land Acquisition for Parks SO,Oow Uplate Signal Equipment $ 10,000 $ 1,000,000 1985 - 1986 City Contribution to Reconstruct U. S. 380 $ 700,000 Equipment/Land Acquisition for Parks $ 502000 Fire Substation $ 450j000 $ 1,200,000 1986 - 1987 I:rlfsipnent/Land Acquisition for Parks $ 50,000 Ifni Lding keiiovation/Expansion $ Lz10__dLO $ 1015o0000 Updated February 1901 BaiJ issue i; Originally $7,000,000 1 Boundaries Length Estimated Riding Distress street Name From To ~Illes~ Class Construction Drainage uality Points_ 1 Locust Eagle University 1.70 A44C R-975,000 253,000 2 99 Bell University Sherman 0.30 U30C R-1390000 3 80 Elm University Eagle 1.70 A40C R-920,000 352,000 2 86 Oak Bolivar Jagoe 1.00 A36C R-484,000 265,000 2 70 Hickory Cedar Austin 0.20 A48C R-122,000 2 74 Hickory Avenue C Welch 0.40 A36C R-180,000 70,000 2 72 Hickory Carroll Cedar 0.10 A35C R-40,000 2 79 Locust University Sherman 0.10 A34C 0**** Locust Sherman Orr 0.55 A34C R-2550000 3 79 Avenue A Highland McCormick 0.55 R34C R-255,000 2 75 Congress Oakland Ponder 0.95 C34C 900300 136,000 2 69 Carroll Northridge Ross 0.50 A36C * 0** 41** Mingo Withers Mockingbird 2,20 R303 1860000 1000000 2 50 Oak Austin Bolivar 0.20 A50C 280000 2 55 Hickory Austin RR 0.30 A55C 46,000 67,000 2 64 Oak RR Austin 0.20 A40C 23,000 63,000 2 52 Bonnie Brad U.S. 77 Windsor 1,10 C253 0*** Bonnie Brae Windsor University 0.75 C1,55 R-2020000 3 77 i 4 August 11, 1982 Boundaries Length Estimated Riding Distress Strcet Namo From To M11es Class Construction Drainage ualijy Points AUdra McKinney End of Divide 0.30 C55C 440400 440000 1 62 Nottingham University Windsor 0.90 A40C R-422,000 3 126 i Welch Cagle Highland 0.15 C40C 17,000 2 59 Welch Mulberry Hickory 0.10 C40C R-46,200 3 84 Welch Hickory Oak 0.10 C40C 0 2 30 a Bernard Hickory' Eagle 0.60 A30C S11000 980000 2 58 West Oak Bonnie Brae Jagoe 0.70 A36C 70,000 2 67 West Oak IH-35 Y 0.30 A64C R-234,000 54,000 4 114 Sunset Anna Carroll 0.10 R34C 0 1 28 sunset Carroll University 0.25 R34C 24,000 1 65 Bolivar Congress University 0.80 C30C 0+ 44+ Uolivar Parkway Congress 0.10 C30C 0+ 27+ Oriole Mockingbird Cardinal 0.35 R34C R-1500000 403,000 3 145 Glenwood Windsor Univi city 0.70 R34C R-3000000 4500000 2 85 Greenwood Laurel Wood Cherrywood 0.70 R34C 66,500 2 47 Greenwood Cherrywood Sherman 0020 R34C 19,000 2 64 Framo RRX S. Mckinney 0,30 R34C 0+++ 578000 Fry Scripture Hickory 0.20 R34C 19,000 2 55 He.nard Willowwood 2H-35 0.10 R36c 10r000 3 65 Boundaries Lenyth Estimated Riding Distress Street Hsnie From To (M11%gj Class Construction Drainage ua It Points Wastway Bolivar Fulton 0.45 R34C 428800 69 Mistyuaud aottingh3m Woodhaven 0.45 R44C 558000 2 55 Mistywood Woodhaven Robinwood 0.30 A44C R-114,000 2 70 Alice Congress University 0.75 R34C 710300 2 63 Wood McKinney Texaa 0.50 R34C 0+++ Crawford Texas McKinney 0130 R34C 0*** He3dlee Hinkle Bolivar 0.60 R34C 0** 40+* Denison Headlee Sherman 0.40 R34C 0** 37** Denison Sherman University 0.10 R34C 10,000 2 60 23.40 5,7191500 2,4121000 Total Street and Drainage Improvements 81131,500 1 • Overlay in 1980 Seal Coat 1981 Seal Coat 1982 Uverlay in 1960 : I CiTYof DENToN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 MEM0RANDU,M TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE: October 1, 1982 SUBJECT: REPORT ON ISSUES OF THE DENTON PARKS ANO RECREATION DEPARTMENT During our recent budget meetings the City Council raised several questions with regard to the Parks and Recreation Department program. Attached please find their reports as summarized below. 1. NON-RESIDENT FLES: The City of Denton Parks and Recreation Department has been aske by the City Council to review its policies concerning non-resident fees. In 1979, the City Council passed a non-resident fee for our sports programs. This fee is $5.00 in addition to regular fees charged. It is the staff's recommendation that we: (a) continue to Implement the same non-resident fee for sports programs, (b) implement a similar fee structure for non-resident participants in the tennis program; (c) charge no additional non-resident fees for participation in classes at recreation centers. 2. HEADSTONES AT OAKWOOD CEMETERY: During the past winterrthe Parks Division undertook a project to clean up our two cemeteries. In the process, a pile of rocks that served as a marker for a historical grave was discarded. It seems that there were no markings on the rocks or the grave which would indicate that these rocks were different from those producing maintenance problems. A permanent historical marker has since been placed on the site by the Business and Professional Women. We"have contacted Hazel Fredericks to attempt to coordinate a project for relocation of other historical sites. However, she indicated that the club will be involved in other projects for the future. The Parks Division regrets this incident, but also makes the clarification that any other missing head stones or markers from the cemetery are due to vandalism or theft which has.been a problem for some time. Memorandum G Chris Hartung, City Manager October 1, 1982 Page Two , 3. DENTON PARKS & RECREATION YOUTH SPORTS AND OFFICIALS: As requested by the City Council, t e Denton Parks and Recreat on Department has provided information on the distribution of payment for youth sports program officials. Included is information on the cost per pp.eEicipant for each sports program. Also, attached is a complete reference report of volunteer hours contributed for each sport.' 4. GIFTS CATALOG FOR DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT: As discussed earlier with the City Council, the Parks an Recreation 0epartment is developing a gift catalog which would illustrate, describe and price specific equipment, materials and services needed by the department. The catalog would familiarize citizens with the needs of the department and encourage the private sector to became involved in parks-related community projects. Items to be included in the gift catalog are: (1) land donations, park renovations, (3) advertising and marketing, (4) equipment, J2~ 5vehicles, (6) tennis facilities, (7) special events and programs (such as sponsoring the annual Halloween Carnival), and other miscellaneous projects. The number of catalogs to be printed, and the format and method of distribution will be contingent upon available finances and donations. Attached is an article from the Sall Street Journal which demonstrates how successful such gift catalogs have been in many communities. I have sample copies of catalogs if the City Council would like to see them. 5. COIN OPERATED LIGHTS AT THE PARKS: The City Council has requested a report concerning the use o coin operated lights at the parks for additional revenue purposes. The staff feels that installing these lights would not provide enough additional revenues to counter the extra maintenance problems. We presently charge user fees for our lighted athletic fields and tennis courts; only a few areas where lights are used by the public are free of charge. Please let me know if I can provide further information on any of the above issues. :C -I' ?__,tt I Betty McKe , Assistant City Manager BMcK:vvs 0656M CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUN'CIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE;817) 5668200 CITY OF DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 280 1982 7:30 P.M. SENIOR CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Campbell, Chairman Ronnie Roberts, Co-Chairman Jane Malone John Travelle MEMBERS ABSENT: Linnie McAdams STAFF PRESENT Steve Brinkman, Director Jo Willborn, Secretary 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDEit: The meeting was called to order by Mike Campbell, Chairman. II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: On a motion of Ronnie Roberts, second of Jane Malone the minutes were approved. 111. OLD BUSINESS: a. Review Parks and Recreation Board Manual: Some discussion was held on meeting dates, which Steve said could be flexible. IV. NEW BUSINESS: a. Approval of Contracts for the Sports Associations: After a brief discussion, Jane Malone made a motion that the contracts be presented to the City Council. Ronnie Roberts seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. b. Public Opinion Survey: This survey gives a guod view of the public opinion of the Parks and Recreation service. One part deals with parks useage--how many times used, etc. McKenna is PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT / 811. 566.8170 Parks 6 Recreation Board Meeting Minute September 28, 1982 Page 2 used most frequently. This survey will be a big help to us. We will get attitudes from different parts of town. We will give you the information as soon as we get it. c. Reorganization of Leisure Services Division We have divided all the programming and all facility supervision into two different areas. Cheryl Standifer will be over the programming aspect, an! Paul Leslie will be over the facilities. d. Capital Improvements There will be a bond election in November for the Capital Improvements P:an. After that, grant applications will be reviewed. e. Review 1982-83 Budget We (Parks and Recreation Department) were asked to submit $123,000 in items for budget cuts, but none were accepted. We will spend some money on Recreation Centers, sports fields, etc. We have also taken on the Building Maintenance ,f all City facilities. So far this have been very manageable. We have hired a new person as Building Maintenance Technician. Our budget is similar to last years, with some emphasis in the Maintenance area. f. Review Annual Report Steve asked the Board members to look through last years anitual report and let him know of ways of improvement for this years Annual Report. He would like to keep it concise, easy to read, understandable and not too expensive. He asked the Board members to also mention anything they would like to have in this years report. V. OTHER BUSINESS: No other business. VI. ADJOURN: On a motion of John Travelle, second of Ronnie Roberts, the meeting was adjourned. DV CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTOANEY MEMORANDUM C.J. Taylor, Jr., City Attorney Joe D. Morris, Assistant City Attorney Robert B. Hunter, Assistant City Attorney DATE: September 1, 1982 T0: Paul. Leslie, Parks f, Recreation FROM: C. J. Taylor,Jr,, City Attorney SUBJECT: Recreation Contracts Attached are the original and one copy of the following contracts: 1. Denton Soccer Association; 2. Denton Girl's Softball Association; 3, Denton Pee Wee Basketball Association; 4. Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc.; and 5. Denton Boy's Tackle Football. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 82-55 passed and approved by the City Council on July 13, 1982; all the above contracts will need to be approved by the City Council, except Item No. 5 whr:e the expendi- ture is below $3,000. Please have them properly executed by the associations and return the original to the undersigned for council approval, Your cooperation in this matter will be appreciated and if you have any questions, please advise. , CJTJR:js Enclosures L CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: October 12, 1982. SUBJECTt Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc. Contract For Services SUMMARY: This contract will allow for hiring of officials by the Association. FISCAL SUMMARY: The amount of _ $11,000.00__ will be transferred to the Association prior to its season for the payment of officials. ACTION REQUIRED: • Approval of contracts per recommendation by staff and the Parks and Recreation Board. ALTERNATIVES: Deny funding or approve partial funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. EXHIBITS: T Director DENTON BOY'S BASEBALL, INC. TILE STATE OF TEXAS S CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DENTON S This Agreement made this the let day of April, 1983, by and between the Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc. hereinafter referred to as 'Association', and the City of Denton, hereinafter referred to as 'City',' each acting by and through its authorized officials, pursuant to the following terms and conditionst 1. City agrees to deposit with the Association the sum of Eleven Thousand and No/100 ($110000.00) Dollare, and certain fees and charges hereinafter described, for the City's fiscal year 1982- 83. Association shall submit an annual budget to the Denton Parks and Recreation Department for approval which shall set forth on an item by item basis the fees and charges hereinafter described, and the above Eleven Thousand and No/100 ($11,000.00) Dollars, the City will make one payment to the Association on the 1st day of April, 19830 in the amount projected in the annual budget. City shall make such payments solely from current revenues in the budget of the Parks and Recreation Department. Expenditures shall be authorized for a period from April 1 through August 31, 1983. II. Association agrees to provide qualified umpires for all Boy's Youth League baseball games and special games that are sponsored by the Denton Boy's Baseball, Inc. III. Association agrees to the following additional terms and conditionst 1. It will establish a separate bank account for deposit of the Eleven Thousand and No1100 ($110000.00) Dollars paid to the Association by the City and all expenditures for services provided shall be made from this account, 1. It will establish, operate, and maintain an account system for this program that will allow for a tracing of funds and a review of the financial status of the program. i 3. It will permit authorized officials for the City of Denton to review its books at any time. 4. It will reduce to writing all of its rules, regulations, and policies and file a copy with the Director of Parks and Recreation or his authorized representative along with any amendments, additions, or revisions whenever, adopted. 5. It will not enter into any contracts that would encumber the city funds for a period that would extend beyond the tern of this Agreement. 6. it will preparo and submit a report of expenditures and revenLes to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his repre- sentative by the 1st day of September, 1983. 1. It will refund the balance of the special account to the City of Denton on or before September 1, 1983. 8. It will promptly pay all bills when submitted= unless there is a diecrapancy in a bill which should be promptly reported to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his authorized represen- talive for further direction. 9. It will appoint a representative who will be available to meet with the Director of Parks and Recreation and other City officials when requested. 10. It will indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims and suits arising out of the activities of the Associ- ation, its employees, and/or contractors. 11. it will obtain releases from the officials which will release, indemnify and hold harmless the City and the Association from any claims, injuries, or damages of the officials. 12. it will retain officials as independent contractors and not as employees. Iv. The general terms and conditions are as follows: 1. If any of the terms and conditions are not complied with by the Association, the City is authorized to refuse to make any further payments until the condition on which the complaint is based in corrected to the satisfaction of the City. DEN"N BOY'S BASEBALL, INC.-PAGE 2 1 2. This contract shall be subject to all valid rules, regu- lations, and laws applicable thereto as promulgated by the United States of America, State of Texas, or any other governmental body or agency having lawful jurisdiction. 3. Association is authorized and should give notices required herein to the Director of Parks and Recreation or that person's authorised representative. Any contc'yutions or gifts received by the Association ace not subject to the provisions of this contract and they should be kept separate and apart from the funds, charges, and fees covered by this contract. 5. Association shall provide its services and be paid by the City in the capacity of an independent contractor and not as an agent or department of the City. It shall have complete control, supervision, and responsibility for Its activities under this contract including the hiring, supervision, and control of its employees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting under authority of their governing body and Board of Directors, have caused this contract to be duly executed in two counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, aA of the 1st day of April, 1983. RICKXRD 0. AR , MAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTt CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORNi C. J. TAYLOR, JR „ CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, IMAS BOY'S BASEBALL, INC. BYa ! BYt 1 NNIE ROBERTS, PRESIDENT That Paul Leslie, Is hereby designated as the person to administer the provision of this agreement. 0. CHRIS SARTURO BXT , CITY MANAGER DENTON BOY'S BASEBALL, INC.-PAGE 3 s CITY OF D ENT0i7 MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: October 12, 1W, SUBJECTt Denton Girl's Softball Association Contract For Services SUMMARY: This contract will allow for hiring of officials by the Association. FISCAL SUMMARY: The amount of _ 4 100.00 will be transferred to the Association prior to its season for the payment of officials. ACTION REQUIRED: • Approval of contracts per recommendation by staff and the Parks and Recreation Board. ALTERNATIVES: Deny funding or approve partial funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. EXHIBITS: DiraCtor DENTON GIRL'S SOF'T'BALL ASSOCIATION THE STATE OF TEXAS 4 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DENTON f This Agreement made this the let day of April, 1983, by and between the Denton Girl's Softball Association, hereinafter referred to as the 'Association', and the City of Denton, hereinafter referred to as 'City', each acting by and through Its authorized officials, pursuant to the following terms and conditi)nss I. City Agrees to deposit with the Association the sum of Faur Thousand One Hundred and No/100 ($40100.00) Dollars and certain fees and charges hereinafter described, for the C:.y's fiscal year 1982-93. Association shall submit an annual budget to the Denton Parks and Recreation Department for approval which shall set forth on an item by Item basis the, fees and charges hereinafter described, and the above Four Thousand One Hundred and No/130 IS1,100.00) Dollars, the City will make one payment to the Associ- ation on the let day of April, 1983, in the amount projected in the annual budget. City shall make such payments solely from current revenues in the budget of the Parks and Recreation Department. Expenditures shall be authorized for a period from April 1 through August 310 1993. it, Association agrees to provide qualified umpires for all Girl's Youth League Softball games and special games that are sponsored by the Denton Girl's Softball Association. III. Association agrees to the following additional terms and conditionss 1. It will eatabiish a separate bank account for deposit of the Four Thousand One Hundred and N01100 ($1,100.00) Dollars paid to the Association by the City and all expenditures for services provided shall be made from this account. 2. It will establish, operate, and maintain an account system for this program that will allow for a tracing of funds and a review of the financial status of the program. 3. It will permit authorized officials for the City of Denton to review its books at any time. it will reduce to writing all of its rules, regulations, and policies and file a copy with the Director of Parks and Recreation or his authorized representative along with any amendmilts, additions, or revisions whenever, adopted. 5. It will not enter Into any contracts that would encumber the City funds for a period that would extend beyond the term of this Agreement. 6. It will prerare and submit a report of expenditures and revenues to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his repre- sentative by the lot day of September, 1983. 7. It will refund the balance of the special account to the City of Denton on or before September 1, 1983. S. It will promptly pay all bills when submittedi unless there is a discrepancy in a bill which should be promptly reported to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his authorized repre- sentative for further direction. 9. It will appoint a representative who will be available to meet with the Director of Parks and Recreation and other City officials when requested. 10. it will indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims and suits arising out of t'l, activities of the Associ- ation, its employees, and/or contractors. 114 It will obtain releases from the officials which will release, indemnify and hold harmless the City and the ASSoci- ation from any claims, injuriee, or damages of the officials. 12, it will retain officials as independent contractors and not as employees. GIRL'S SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION-PAGE 2 IV. The general terms and conditions are as followse 1. If any of the terms and conditions are not complied with by the Association, the City is authorized to refuse to make any further payments until the condition on which the complaint is based is corrected to the satisfaction of the City. 2. This contract shall be subject to all valid rules, regula- tions, and laws applicable thereto as promulgated by the United States of America, State of Texas, or any other governmental body or agency having lawful jurisdiction. 3. Association is authorized and should give notices required herein to the Director of Parks and Recreation or that person's authorized representative. 4. Any contributions or gifts received by the Association are not subject to the provisions of this contract and they should be kept separate and apart from the funds, charges, and fees covered by this contract. 5. Association shall provide its services and be paid by the City in the capacity of an independent contractor and not as an agent or department of the City. it shall have complete control, supervision, and responsibility for its activities under this contract including the hiring, supervision, and control of its employees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting under authority of their governing body and Board of Directore, have caused this contract to be duly executed in two counterparts, each of 4hich will constitute an original, as of the lit day of April, 1983. RICHARD . STEWART# MAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTr CHARLOTTE ALLER, MY R R CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS GIRL'S SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION-PAGE 3 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOAMr C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: DENTON GIRDS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION 1 BYe ~ I D D W TE, PRESIDENT That Paul Leslie, is hereby designated as the person to administer the provision of this agreement. a DATE is KARL-No CITY MANAGER i i i CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM. DATE OF MEETING: October 12, 1982. SUBJECT: Denton Pee Wee Basketball Association Contract for Services SUMMARYt This contract will alloy far hiring of officials by the Association. FISCAL SUMMARY: The amount of $30000.00 will be transferred to the Association prior to its season for the payment of officials. ACTION REQUIRED: • Approval of contracts per recommendation by staff-and the Parks and Recreation Board. ALTERNATIVES: Deny funding or approve partial funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. EXHIBITS: r _ r.r !rector DENTjN PEE WEE BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION TOE STATE of TEXAS S CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DENTON S This Agreement made this the let day of December, 1982, between the Denton Pee Wee Basketball Association, hereinafter referred to as the 'Association", and the City of Denton, hereinafter referred to as "City', each acting by and through its authorized officials, pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. City agrees to pay to the Association the SUM of Three Thousand and No/100 ($3,000.00) Dollars, and certain fees and charges hereinafter described, for the City's fiscal year 1982-1983. Association shall submit an annual budget to the city for approval which shall set forth on an item by item basis the fees and charges hereinafter described, and the above Three Thousand and No/100 (;31000.00) Dollars, the City will make one payment to the Association on the lot day of December, 1982, in the amount projected in the annual budget. City shall make such payments solely from current revenues in the budget of the Parks and Recreation Department. Expenditures shall be authorized for a period from December It 1982, through February 28, 1993. it. Association agrees to provide qualified Basketball officials for all Youth League Basketball games and special games that are sponsored by the Denton Pee Wee Basketball Association. iii. Association agrees to the following additional terms and conditions: 1. It will establish a separate bank account for deposit and expenditure of funds described herein to avoid any accidental commingling of funds. 2, it will establish, operate, and maintain an account system for this program that will allow for a ttacing of funds and a review of the financial status of the program. r 3. It will permit authorized officials for the City of Denton to review its books at any time. 4. It will reduce to writing all of its rules, regulations and policies, and file a copy with the Director of Parks and Recreation or his authorized representative along with any amendments, additions, or revisions whenever adopted. S. it will not enter into any contracts that would encumber the City funds for a period that would' extend beyond the term of this Agreement. 6, it will prepare and submit a report of expenditures and revenues to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his representative by the 1st day of March, 1983. 7. It will refund the balance of its account to the City of Denton on or before March 1, 1993. 8. It will promptly pay all sills when submitted) unless there is a discrepancy in a bill which &Sould be promptly reported to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his authorized representative for further direction. 9. It will appoint a representative who will be available to meet with the Director of Parks and Recreation and other City officials when requested. 10. It will Indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims and suits arising out of the activities of the Association, its employees, and/or contractors. 11. It will obtain releases from the officials which will release, indemnify and hold harmless the City and the Association. from any claims, injuries, or damages of the officials. 12. It will retain officials as independent contractors and not as employees. IV. The general terms and conditions are as follower 1. It any of the terms and conditions are not complied with by the Association, the City is authorized to refuse to make any further payments until the condition on which the complaint is based is corrected to the satisfaction of the City. PAOR 2 1 2. This contract Shall be subject to all valid rules, regulations, and laws applicable thereto as promulgated by the United States of America, State of Texas, or any other governmental body or agency having lawful jurisdiction. 3. Association is authorized and should give notices required herein to the Director of Parke and Recreation or that person's authorized representative. 1. Any contribution or gifts received by the Association are not subject to the provisions of this contract and they should be kept separate and apart from the funds, charges, and fees covered by this contract. 5. Association shall provide its services and be paid by the City in the capacity of an Independent contractor and not as an agent or department of the City. It shall have complete control, Supervision, and responsibility for its activities under this contract including the hiring, supervision, and control of Its employees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto,racting under authority of their governing body and Board of Directore, have caused this contract to be executed in two counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, as of the day of , 1982. AMARD 0. , KAYOK CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTS Charlotte Allen, City Secretary r CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORKr C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DENTON PER WEE BASXETBALL ASSOCIATION by l BY r PAGE 3 CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: October 12, 1982• SUBJECT: Denton Soccer Association Contract for Services SUMMARYr 'ibis contract will allow for hiring of officials by the Association. FISCAL SUMMARY: The amount of _144500.00 will be transferred to the Association prior to its season for the payment of officials. ACTION REQUIRED: • Approval of contracts per recommendation by staff and the Parks and Recreation Board. ALTERNATIVES: Deny funding or approve partial funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval EXHIBITS: hector DENTON SOCCER ASSOCIATION THE STATE OF TEXAS S CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DENTON $ This Agreement made this the _ day of 1982, by and between the Denton Soccer Association, hereinafter referred to as the "Association"s and the City of Denton, hereinafter referred to as "City", each acting by and through its authorized officials, pursuant to the following terms and conditionsr 1. City Agrees to pay to the Association the sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 ($4,500.00) Dollars and certain fees and charges hereinafter described, for the City's fiscal year 1982- 83. Association shall submit an annual budget to the Denton ?arks and Recreation Department for approval which shall set forth on an item by item basis the fees and charges hereinafter described, and the above Four Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 1$4,500.00) Dollars, the City will make one payment to the Association on the lot day of October, 1982, in the amount projected in the annual budget. City shall make such payments solely from current revenues in the budget of the Parks and Recreation Department. Expenditures shall be authorized for a period from October 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983. II. Association agrees to provide the following aervicest 1, It shall provide qualified Soccer Officials for all Youth League Soccer games and special games that are sponsored by the Denton Soccer Association. ttt, Association agrees to the following additional terms and conditionsi 1. It will establish a separate bank account for deposit and expenditure of funds described herein to avoid any accidential comingling of funds. 2, it will establish, operate, and maintain an account system for this program that will allow for a tracing of funds and a review of the financial status of the program. 3. It will permit authorized officials for the City of Denton to review its books at any time. 4. It will reduce to writing all of its rules, regulations, and policies and file a copy with the Director of Parks and Recreation or his authorised representative along with any amendments, additions, or revisions whenever, adopted, 5. it will not enter into any contracts that would encumFer the City funds for a period that would extend beyond the term of this Agreement. 6. it will prepare and submit a report of expenditures and revenues to the Director of Parks and Recreation or his repre- sentative by the lot day of December, 1982 and the lot day of June, 1983. 7. it will refund the balance of its account except for MAO to keep the account open, to the City of Denton on or before June 1, 1983. 8. It will promptly pay all bills when submittedi unless there is a discrepancy In a bill which should be promptly reported to the Director of'Parks and Recreation or his authorised reFrr- sentative for further direction. 9, it will appoint a representative who will be available to meet with the Director of Parks and Recreation and other City officials when requested. 104 It will indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims and suits arising out of the activities of the Association, its employees, and/or contractors. ll. It will obtain releases from the officials which will release, indemnify and hold harmless the City and the Associ- ation from any claims, injuries, or damages of the officials. 12. It will retain officials as independent contractors and not as employees, IV. The general terms and conditions are as followst 1. If any of the termr And conditions are not complied with by the Association, the City is authorized to refuse to make any further payments until the condition on which the complaint is based is corrected to the satisfaction of the City. 2. This contract shall be subject to all valid rules, regula- tions, and laws applicable thereto as promulgated by the United States of America, State of Texas, or any other governmental body or agency having lawful jurisdiction. 3. Association is authorized and should give noticer required herein to the Director of Parke and Recreation or that person's authorized representative. Any contributions or gifts received by the Association are not subject to the provisions of this contract and they should be kept separate and apart from the funds, charges, and fees covered by this contract. 5, Association shall provide its services and be paid by the city in the capacity of an independent contractor and not am an agent or department of the City. It shall have complete control, supervision, and responsibility for its activities under this contract including the hiring, supervision, and control of its employees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting under authority of their governing body and Board of Directors, have caused this contract to be duly executed in two counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, as of the „ day of , 1982. RICHARD 0. , 0709 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTt Charlotte Allen, City Secretary CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DENTON SOCCER ASSOCIATION syl J ; M fDM That Paul Leslie is hereby designated as the person to administer the provision of this agreement. _ CHRIS HARTUNO CITY KMAGER 1 f i L_ CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TO: G. Chris Hartung FROM: Kick Svehla DATE: October 13, 1982 sUBjhGT: Use of the Landfill by residents of Cross Roads Attached is an agreement between the City of Denton and the City of Cross Roads to allow the residents of Cross Roads to dispose of residential solid waste and trash in the Landfill at no cost. Apparently, this was an arrangement that existed for many years. When it was brought to my attention earlier this year, the practice was stopped since the ordinance does not allow it. The attached agreement would allow the Cross Roads residents to use the landfill free of charge, as in the past. The agreement would allow the City to carry out the intentions of the Council in the past. If you or the Council have any further questions, please call. z 000'e~ - Ric., 6v66 1T t i • r i AGREEMENT E THE STATE OF TEXAS S KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS$ COUNTY OF DENTON S This Agreement made between the City of Denton, Texas and the City of Crossroads, Texas, Municipal Corporations of the State of Texas, in consideration of the mutual covenants set or" herein, agree as followst 1. The City of Denton agrees to allow the citizens of Crossroads, Texas to use the sanitary landfill site owned and operated by the City of Denton and located in proximity to state Highway 390 and Mosley Road for purposes of disposal of residential garbage and trash in accordance with the City of Denton's permit for such landfill site without charge to the citizens of Crossroads. 2. The City of Crossroads %grees to keep and maintain Mosley Road and the right of way thereof which is adjacent to said landfill site free and clear of all garbage, trash and debris deposited thereon. 3. This Agreement shall be in force and effect for a period of two years from the date of execution thereoft provided, however, should the City of Denton cease to use the location as a sanitary landfill site during the two year term, this Agreement shall terminate and the time of such nonuse. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of October, 1982. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CITY OF CROSSROADS, TEXAS BY$ BY[ RICRW 0. TE' RT, MAYO MKYOR ATTESTS ATTESTt I VICXI WESTLING, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY SECRETARY, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CITY OF CROSSROADS, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR.4i C. J. TAYLOR, JR „ CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY$ i CROSSROADS AGREEMENT-PAGE ONt CWYof DENTON, YEXA 'iroPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 5668200 Office of the City Manager MEMORANDUM T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council BROW G. Chris Hartung, City Manager DATE: (3ctober 14, 1982 As per the request of Council Persons Riddlesperger and Stephens, I dated placed this item on the agenda. The City Council has received an up population figure by blocks, from the North Central Texas Council of Governments which concerns the necessary use in developing any proposed changes to Council Districts. G. Chris Hartung City Manager (Jl;li: vvw UG97M CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Bill McNary, Director of Finance DATE: October 14, 1982 SUBJECT: Repair of Antenna System On the agenda for October 19, 1982, is approval of a Purchase Order for repair of the antenna system at City Hail. The final cost of this repair was $4,138.76. The original estimate was S2,ODU and a Purchase Order was issued under that estimate. The damage was more extensive than originally estimated and Council approval is required, since the cost exceeded $3,000. John Marshall will be available to answer questions concerning this Purchase Order. W. H. McNar WHMcN/ca 0460C CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Summary Sheet Meeting Date: October 19, 1982 Agenda Item Subject: Bid #9049A, Purchase order 454022 Repair Storm Damage to Antenna System Summary: Late last spring we suffered the loss of part of the roof on the Council Chambers, damage to trees and extensive damage to our communication antenna system, We first received an estimate for the Insurance in early July for $2,000.00, about the same time we received bids for the roof repair. We still have damage to the interior to be repaired. We issued a Purchase Order for the antenna repairs of $2,000.00 on July 19, 1981. As you recall, we were some time getting the roof repaired after the bid in order to complete the antenna repairs. On September 1, 1982 I received a memo from John Maxwell that the estimate was now $4,000.00. We then proceeded to obtain bids for the job. We received only the $4,000.00 estimate from the one vendor, North Counties C.>mmcnieations. This is the only local, capable source of doing this type of repair work. The revised estimate was made for the bid after a careful examination of the damage and the required work. It was some what of an emergency that the work should be done as soon as possible, because of the reception, the lack of wire anchors and some of the antenna were completely distroyed. We also were not protected by lightening arrestors or proper grounding. The work has been completed fo: the total amount of $4,138.76. Action Required: Approval by Council. Source of Funds: Re-inbursement by the Insurance Company and budget 100-002-0007-8301 Recommendation: We recommend this emergency, storm damage, Insurance covered bid/purchase be approved to North Counties ConLnunications for the total amount of $4,138.76. Exhibits: None 5ubr~LCted Hy: •117 ,z '-e ~'Jo in I: Vim( eishal L, C.P.M. PuO--hasing Agent to 'e 0 '.Y, C rr r. a, 43 c H 41 tR 11 H r- V O H O x Q~ N 0 C 7J ~ i.~ D co (U 4) fu AJ to a x 3 cI ro u V c pt.1 4) H a a ro ° v o H ° , w ai z0 u N 0 ro 0 u a t7+ E CL 41 O ❑ tT ttoo 4 -L) A a ro u v w A +j Q q a % 0 o w o 0 u 0 u+ Hw c 4J o w j W 4 N 4J ,14 H L 0 41 Q, n' C w E+ C 0 ro aroi ° W N 3 H u C Lj u to x 0 W+ O 3 U V V 0 •,a E 2 0 p W C 't3 to N v H 2 p m H 5c q a r t c k . ' ,a E+ U N V U) on N 0 Ili 04 ❑ C +7 to v row, c ~ C O 0 4.1 z U ~ Q< 3: ~ ~ to O ~ a U 00 0 o ° C A tp W 0 W ~ C D L 0 U W U1 C in r4 C U G V Ql H O ro C to a t fa Aj 4j (v .4.1 0 V .,4 .,4 0 0 H w r-! to .tj a L 0i C sJ H V v V 0 w .,4 0 44 e-4 0 41 10 10 -,4 Aj 4) 14 w 0 0 H c C CL H .4 a x C O x fo O w W u to C u 4 a) r: 0 ❑ ' 1-i m JJJ to 4 ,1j d. W 41 H z r4 O (r 0 Li 0 0 w F U ro v OH u u a a~i C N W W g4 p W C4 w C4 0 44 4J .,4 Aj ,a 3 U Ut ►Ht to H .,4 r-1 U W E-4 O th to to a H W O D O V U 0 4 F 7 C1 H H to A ❑ N ~ ~ U w a H 0 Q ~UU Qu u m CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY THIS IS TO CIPTIFY that the miuophntographs appearing on We Flim•fllo f1arMnf . I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET -10/19/82 and Indlnq with CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET are accurate and complete mprodvclions of the records of (Company and Dopl.) CITY OF DENTON - CITY SECRETARY .as delivered In the regular course of business for photographing. H Is further certified that the micropholographic processes ware accompllehod in a mannor and on Alm which meals with nqulremonls of the National flunrou of Standards fw pemononl mlcrophclog rop Iic copy. ;„faun • Racords Comply ILemal T(CHMOLDGY AT(W9PA / c.r.or PWW PIJtCCib,a ;&GIt+Park Rare State Arlington, Texas 76010