Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-01-1983 NOTICE OF ORK~SUSSION~• REGUL - SF'ii'lAL CALLHD EMERGENCY ~~1Bf37'iNG OR THE ~GC-a O F T H B Cui'1'Y OF VENTON, TEXAS. Notice 13 hereby giv ci tha~j on the _ day of 19 the ' of ot~Uenton";`l"exas w W? J r ~sess p~ - rage ar special called, - emergency Mee ng at -°i o'clock, s m,, In ' the f t~ Ie unicipal Bui ng 'lo(~ated at ;;15 ast c' nn y, e 4 n on, axes. The subjects to be considered are ;listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and make a part of this not ice. If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the Board/Commission should determine that an executive meeting of the 13oard/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should be held or is required, then such executive meeting; or consultation with the City's attorney as authorized by Arl:icle 6252.17 Revised Civil. Statutes of Texas will be held by the Board/Commission at the date, hour, and place given In this notice or as soon after the i.ommencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the idoard/Commission may conveniently meet in such executive meeting, or consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and for an and all purposes permitted by Section ?(b) through Section ,2(p), inclusive, of said Article 62$2.17, including, but not limited to: Section 2(c), Section 2(e), Sect ton '2(f), Section 2(g), and Section 2(j) And as marked in the attached Agenda, Should any final action, final decision, or final vote be required In the opinion of the Board/Commiss Lon with regard to any inatter considered in such executive meeting or consultation with the i*ity's attorney, then such final acrlon, final decision, or final vote shall be at either; (a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of this public meeting, or (b) at a subsequent public meeting of the Board/Commission upon notice thereof, as the Board/Commission shall determine. On this day of .r , 1,9 e the original of -zl this instrument was filed arp g t o c`.ial records of the C{ ty of Denton, 'texas, and an origiddi 'copy wa posted on the bulletin board in the main lobby of the Muiiiclpal Blailding of the City of Denton at o'clock,on said date, A L h ALL 'c , (Try S 'Cft I Y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS u214C NOTICE OF WORK SESSION -16ZlLAR S P 8 C I CALLED - EMERGENCY MEBTiNG OF THE OF THE CI'T'Y OF DENTON, 'T'EXAS. Notice is hereby given that, on the day of 18 k, the the City of Denton, exas w i~fa work session regu ar - special called - emergency me ing at 7e' ~ o,cloc .1 - m., in the y w;_, of t 1e unIcIPa1 8ui1 a g oocated at 215 Hast Mc inne Tenton, exas, The subjects to be considered are listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and make a part of this notice. If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the Board/Commission should determine that an executive meeting of the Board/Commission, or a eonsultatiun with the City's attorney should be held or is required, then such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney as authorized by Article 6252-17 Revised Civil Statutes of Texas will be held by the Board/Commission at the date, hour, and plane given In this notice or as soon after the commencement of the meeting covered by this notice as the Board/Commission may conveniently meet in such executive meeting, or consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and for any and 0.1 purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section 2(p), inclusive, of said Article 6252-17, Including, but not limited to: Section ?(c), Section 2(e), Sect ton 2(f), Section 2(gand Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda, Should any final action, final decision, or final vote be required. In the opinion of the Board/Commission with regard to any matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation with the City's attorney, then such final action, final decision, or final vote shall be at either: (a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the reconvening of this public meeting, or (b) at a subsequent public meeting of the Hoard/Commission upon notice thereof, as the Board/Commission shall determine. On this - y1`-day of l9 , the original of this instrument was filed am the o vial records of the City of Denton, 'texas, and an origin copy was posted on the bulletin board 'in the main lobby of the Niuntclpal Building of the City of Denton at clock, -*-v- on said date. I AR ' E ALL 'N, -Coll ' SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 0214C V CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL February 11 1983 Public Nearing by the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, Februar 1, 1983, at 30451 p.m. on the east side of Teasley Mane (VM 21.81 } and north of Robinson Road. 3045 p,m. 11 public Hearings 1. This iii a public. hearing to consider annexation of approximately 4$6 acres of land located along the east aide of Teasley lane (Fbt 2181) and north of Robinson Road. 2-1560 (The Planning and 'Zoning Commission recommends approval.) work Smesion of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, ,'kkOs )riaa y 1, 1983 at 4x15 p.m, in Lhe Civil Defense Rooth of the Munlc:ipal Building at which the following items will be co.;»., i de r ed . 4:15 p,m, 1. Executive Sessions A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A,T.S. n. Real Estate - Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A,T.S. C. Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D, Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6256-17 V.A.T.S. 5130 P.M. 1. Receive a report on the City of Denton's Economic Development Program. 2. Receive a report from Chuck Carpenter, Executive Director of the City of Denton Chamber of Commerce, regarding reoont Chamber activities. Regular Meeting of the city of Denton City Council on 'T'uesday, February 11 1983 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be consid.Qred. 7:Oo p.m. 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 18, 1983. 1 r 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda February 11 1983 Page Two 2. Consent Agendas Eaoh of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Bids and Purchase Orderss 1. Bid # 9085 Distribution Transformers 2. Bid # 9086 Capacitors 3. Bid # 9089 Sale of Refuse 't'ruck 4. Bid # 9093 Renovation of Heat, Air Conditioning and Ventilation S. Bid # 9097 Lath and plaster 6. Bid # 9098 Ceramic the 7. Bid # 9101 Lockers 8. Bid # 969 Wood doors 9. Bid # 9104 Wnthood 10. Bid # 9110 Sale of lathe and drill presses B. Final Paymentst 1. Approve final payment to Jagoe Public for the balance of Northridge drainage. C. Plates 1. Approve the final plat of block 1, Lakewood Estates, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the final replat of lots 2, 3, and 4, block 14, Ows,ley Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton CIty Council Agenda February 14 1983 Page Three 3. Public Hearingsi A. (Z-1560) This is a public hearing to consider annexation of approximately 456 acres of land located along the east side of Teasley lane (FM 2181) and north of Robinson Road, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) B. (Z-1555) This is the petition of Joe Belew requesting a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to planned development (PD) classification for multi-family use on a '9.1 acre parcel beginning at the northeast corner of Bernard and Vodsey, The property has approximately 620 feet of frontage along the east side of Bernard Street and 600 feet of frontage along the north side of Lindsey Street, if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the construction of approx mately 271 multi-family units. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning from single family (8F-7) to planned development (PD) classification on a 9.1 acre parcel beginning at the northeast corner of Bernard and Lindsey, C. (5-164) This is the petition of W. V. Tunnicliff requesting a specific use permit to allow for the expansion of the Center Point Mobile Home Park on property located adjacent and north of the existing mobile home park and containing approximately 4.5 acres of land, The Center Paint Mobile Home Park is located along the west side of Forth Worth Drive (U.S. Highway 377), beginning approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of James Street and 1<ort Worth Drive. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an Ordinance approving a specific use permit to allow for the expansion of the Center Point Mobile Home Park on property located adjacent and north of the existing mobile home park and containing approximately 4.5 acres of land. City of Denton City Council Agenda February 1, 1983 Page Four 4. Approval of the site plan of North Texas Industrial Park - Phase I. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 51 Approval of the final plat of North Texas Industrial. Park Phase I. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Appearance by Mr. Joe Landers representing the Links Club regarding the use of Fred Moore Park on June 17, 18, and 19, 1983. 7. Ordinances, A. Approval of an Ordinance authorizing the City-County Health Offiaers to issue written citations to persons violating health laws within the Denton City limits. B. Approval of the revised weed Ordinance. C. Consider repealing the No Parking Zone in the 1200 block of Elm Street to allow vehicles to park on the east side of Elm Street from its intersection with Second Street to its intersection with Third Street, (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) A. Approval of are Ordinance designating a No Parking zone on the south side of Third Street between Elm and Locust. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) S. Approval of an Ordinance designating a No Parking Zone on the south side 'of Sawyer Street between Austin and Locust. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) F. Approval of a truck route Ordinance. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Sui?port. Commission recommends approval.) G. Approval of an Ordinance regulating the operation of emergency ambulances and transfer ambulances in the City of Denton. H. Approval of an Ordinance providing for a two percent (28) tax on bingo receipts. City of Denton City Council Agenda February 1, 1983 Page Five 8. Resolutionst A. Consider adoption of a resolution acquiring 0,65 acres to replace parkland lost to Windsor Drive, 91 Receive a report on the naming of the Library. 10. Receive a report from Alexander Grant on the City of Denton audit, 11. Receive a report on TMPA, 12, Official Action on Executive Session Itemas A. Legal Matters B, Real Estate C. Personnel D, Board Appointments 13, New Business$ This item provides a section in which to suggest new items of business for future agendas. I 06140 d , AMDA CITY OV 0ENTON CITY COUNCIL February 1, 1983 Public Ilearing by the City of Denl:on City council on Tuosday, February 1, 1903, at 3x45 pp,M. on the octet sidq of Teasley Lane (VM 2181? and north of Robinson Road, 3x45 p.m. 14 Public Hearing3 1. This is a public bearing to consider annexation of approximately -156 acres of land located along the east side of Teasley lane (FM 2181) and north of Robinson Road', 1-1560 (The Planning and 'Zoning Commission recommends approval.) Work Session of the City of Denton Cit Council on Tueeday, February 1, 1983 at 4:15 p,m. in the Civ~l Defense Room of the Municipal,'Building at which the following items will be considered. 4115 p.m. 1. Executive Sessionr A. Legal Mate'grs - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T,S. B, Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S, C. Personnel - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252--17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments - Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6356-17 V.A.T,S. 5130 p,m. 1. Receive a report on the City of Denton's Economic Development Program. 2. Receive a report from Chuck Carpenter, Executive ' Director of the City of Denton Chamber o'E Commerce, { regarding recent Chamber activities. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, FebrGary 1, 1963 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building `at which the following items will be considered, 7x00 p,m, 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of j ,January 18, 1983. I .4 City of Denton City Council Agenda February 1, 1963 Page Two Consent Agendas Each of these items is recommended by the Staff' and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in ac;cordat)ce with the Staff recommendations. A. Dick and Purchase Orderss 1. Bid # 9065 Distribution Transformers 2. Bid # 0066 Capaci.tora 3. Bid # 9069 Sale of Refuse 't'ruck 4. bid # 9093 Renovation of Heat, Air Couclitioning and Ventilation 5. Bid # 9097 Lath and plaster 6. Bid # 9096 Ceramic the 7. F3id # 9101 Lockers B. Bid # 9099 Wood doors 9. [aid # 9104 Venthood 10. Bid # 9110 Sale of lathe and drill. presses B. Final Paymentst 1. Approve final payment to Jagoe Public for the balance of Northridge drainage. C. Plats s 1. Approve the final plat of block 1, Lakewood Estates. ('t'he Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the final roplat of lots 2'(TY, ? and 4, block 14, Owsley Park Addition. Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) I 1i E 15 City of Denton City Council Agenda February 1, 1983 Page Three 3. Public Hearingst A. (Z-1560) This is a public hearing to consider annexation of approximately 456 acres of land located along the east side of Teasley lane (FM 21b1) and north of Robinson Road, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.,) B. (Z-1555) This is the petition of Joe Below requesting a change in zoning from single family (810--7) to planned development (PD) classification for multi-family use on a 9.1. acre parcel beginning at the northeast corner of Bernard and Lindsey. The property has approximately 620 feet of frontage along the east side of Bernard Street and 600 feet of frontage along the north side of Lindsey Street. If approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the construction of approximately 271 multi-family units. (The 1'lanni.ng and Zoning Conlin ission recommends approval.) 3. Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning from single family (SF-7) to planned development (VD) classification on a 9.1 acre parcel beginning at the northeast corner of Bernard and Lindsey. C. (S-164) This is the petition of W. V. Tunnic.liff requesting a specific use permit to allow for the, expansion of the Center Point Mobile Home Park on property located adjacent and ' north of the existing mobile home park and containing approximately 4.5 acres of land. The Center Point Mobile Home Park is located along the west side of Forth Worth Drive (U.S. Highway 377), beginning approximately 200 feet north of the ir.tor,section of dames Street and Fort Slorth Driva. (The Planning and 121on1rig Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an Ordinance approving a specific, use permit to allow for the expansion of the Center Point Mobile [come Dark on property located adjacent and north of the existing mobile home park and containing approximately 4.5 acres of land. City of Denton City Council Agenda February 11 1P83 Page Pour 4. Approval of the site plan of North Texas Industrial Park - Phase 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Approval of the final plat of North Texas Indusf:,rial Park - Phase 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval..) 6. Appearance by Mr. Joe Landers representing the Links Club regarding the use of Fred Moore hark on Jurna 17, 188 and 19, 1983. 7. Ordinances: A. Approval of an Ordinance authorizing the City-County Health Officers to issue written citations to persons violating health laws within the Denton City limits. B. Approval of the revisod weed Ordii>ance. C. Consider repealing the No Parking Zone an the 1200 block of Elm Street to allow vehicles to park on the east side of Elm Street from its intersection with Second Street to its intersection with 'T'hird Street. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) D. Approval of an Ordinance designating a No Parking Zone on the south side of 'T'hird Street between Elm and Locust. (The Citizsni) Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) E. Approval of an Ordinance designating a No Parking Zone on the south side oll aawyor Street between Austin and Locust. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.) F. Approval of a truck route Ordinance. (The Citizensa Traffic Safety Support commission recommends approval.) G. Approval of an Ordinance ::eyulatiny the operation of emergency ambulances And transfer ambulances in the City of Denton. 11. Approval of an Ordinance providing for a two percent (2%) tax on bingo receipts. City of Denton City Council Agenda February 1, 19£33 Page [give a. Resolutionsi A. Consider adoption of a resolution acquiring 0.65 acr,,,s to replace parkland lost to Windsor Drive. 9. Receive a report on the naming of the Library. 10. Receive a report from Alexander. Grant on the City of Denton audit. 11. Receive a report on WIPA. 12. Official Action on Executive Session Ttemsi A. Lo,al Matters 13. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 13. New Businesst This item provides a section in which to auggest new items of business for future agendas. 06140 MEMORANDUM DATE; January 26, 1983 \ T0; Mayor and City Council 1 F OM; Charles Watkins, Senior Planner SUBJECT; Field hearing for annexation it is respectful].y re uested that the Council assemble in the Municipal Building at 3.15 p.m, on February 1, 1983 for transportation to the site of the hearing. CW;cs CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BAZIK TUP ff RT>-R- HPT MEETING DATE4 February It 1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: This is a public hearing to consider annex- ation of approximately 456 acres of land located along the east side of Teasley Lane (FM 2181) and north of Robinson Road, (Z-1560) SUMMARY: Construction of a t~,uuile home park has I)egun on a tract of land consisting of approximately eighty-three (83) acres lo- cated on the east side of Teasley Lane and north of Robinson Road. Grading, pouring of pads and laying of the internal water and sewer system has begun. The annexation policy sets out four (4) guidelines for determining when annexation should be considered: 1. Single family developments over five lots, 2. Multi-family, industrial or commercial developments over one acre. 3. Any area where the density exceeds 500 units per square mile. 4. Any development or area that might present a significant impact upon the City in such ways as service cost, in- creased traffic, utility needs or util- ization, safety or health hazards, sub- standard construction practices, detri- mental aesthetic quality or other simi- lar community impacts. The annexation policy also requires consid- eration of annexing logical planning areas around the area of initial concern. iW (:ity Council Agenda Back-up summary Sheet ti'ebruary It 1983 pogo 2 If the land lying north of the mobile home park was left out of the annexation it would be surrounded by the Denton city 'mite. Additionally, some of the property to the east of the mobile homo park has been discussed with the staff, as the future site of a multi-family development and the easternmost parcel which abuts the Corinth City limit was sold for development pur- poses but was repossessed by the sellers. The Hickory Creek Sewer line is approxi- mately 95% complete at this time. The line runs along the east side of the mobile home park. Staff believes that the mobile home park under construction is in essence a multi- family development in that approximately 400 units are proposed for one 80 acre tract of land with the remaining three (3) acres to be reserved for possible retail uses. The scale of the development alone suggests a significant impact upon the city. it is felt that the 456 acre tract consti- tutes a logical plannin+) area and the pre- sence of the sewer line insures additional future development in this area. ACTION REQUIRIM i Hold a public hearing, no other action is required. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Hold a public hearing. 2. Choose not to continuo the annexation process. 3. Delete territory from the proposed annexation. City Council Agenda Back-Up Summary Sheet February 1, 1983 Page 3 RECOMME NDAT10Nt The Planning and Zoning commission recom- mends approval of the proposed annexation by a vote, of 5-0. SX11113ITS1 1, Map 2. Service plan 3, property owner List 4. Reply Forms Total 5, planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of January 19, 1983 r, 1 -WA n es ins Senior planner . •^-~.~~a 4 cnllwlll.,0lrww:11 w~ ,1411 \ 1 1 1 _ .l Z-1564 1 J1 1 1 r'w'11 . 1 , . 1 J If 1 1 1~ PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS 1MVREAu, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the go%verninF; body of a city prior to paq,,ittge of an ordinance annexing an area; and IMEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area whioh is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS; Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 070a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service; 1. Basic Service Plan A. Polio (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and-other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B. Fire + (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the-effective date of annexation, C. Water (-1) water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas., E. Refuse Collection (1) The swine regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation, s9ervioe Plan Annexed Areas page two F. -Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, eta.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same Pasis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area oa the effective date of annexation, (3) ]Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will'be accomplished under the established policies of the city. G. Inspection Services (1) Any iro3pection services now provided by the city (building) electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitntinn,___et.c_,) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, I{. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City plariniug will thereafter -encompass the annexed area. T. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J, Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program a?.id facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution , (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. %5orvloe Plan Annexed 'Areas PtIge three L Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the et~eotive date of annexation, II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines a8;, (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. (2) -Impact. on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics, The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the - upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIF planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. Proposed Annexation Schedules (Button Mobile Home Park) Z-1560 January l0, 1.983 - Submit Agenda Items January 12, 1983 - Submit Agenda Back-up * January 18, 1983 - Council. sets date, place and time- for public hearings January 19, 1983 - Deliver ad to Denton Record Chronicle January 21, 1983 'publish Advertisement Ja try 24, L9.83 - Submit Agenda Items January 26, 1983 - Submit Agenda Back-up February 1, 1983 Hold public hearing in field and in Council Chambers February 21, 1983 - Submit Agenda Items ::_Yeb_njar.y 23,_ 1983. - Stihmir_Agenda Back-up u Mar`-c:h 1, 1983 - Institute annexation proceedings March 2, 1983 - Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle March 4, 1983 - Publish Ordinance March 28, 1983 - Submit Agenda Items March 30, 1983 - Submit: Agenda Back-up u April 5, 1983 - 'Final Action City Council Activities II i w I i 1 130s, ,A Ire «a s Ce ZO Aro 007 ti Y T I V Phi ~n f~ 1/0 41 A 1 r Jr H d r Den b '407A ! ~raCf ~A files. y~ , Trn~.~ 1 Zeamt trr A _ Add,r.~s a 6n d , ~C ~i.~ ~e rL a f 7t,re f Ala, wen _-ep) r' L (f 414 r e -6 LIU- r ~,°rlYSe n 6 q3 f eon L~dfn~-s Jt T nc f 2 J9 ` crilm \ _ _ _rd _ >7~fitjlt<eh /JAW/fh/ ~rrtd--IfN gj46 1 i . ~r ~ 9 ~ u W r, . ;;xoa t 0 3 -two bo~ PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1560 IN_AVOR IN OPPOSITION UND 'C DED z„ R, Herkimer Nona Received Nona Received ,5902 llestgrove Dallas, Texas 931-6142 1 Minutes Planning and zoning commission Oanuary 19, 1983 Page 6 they would be a ,plying for under a normal subdivision plat. Mr. Watkins further explained he thought Mr. But- ton had refused to be annexed. Here again, his informa- tion was incorrect. Mr, Button had not refused to be annexed. Mr. Sidor asked about the extension of Loop 288? Mr. Watkins explained there are two options, pirst* in the future.when it comes time to build it they can acquire 60 feet from Mr. Button, or second, lot±?; ~-;c ai„finding the thoroughfare plan to see if there is a more suitabl4 less expensive route. Mr. Si,dor moved to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat of block 1, Lakewood Estates as presented to Commission at last meeting, Seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried.. (5-0) B. FConsider making a reeommondation on the annexation of approximately 456 acres of land including the mobile home park under construction on the north aide of (UNAPPROVED) Robinson Road. (Z-1560) Mr. Watkins explained request and showed a map to the Commission explaining where Mr, button is developing his mobile home park. He said Robinson load forms a natural boundary. Ruth Mitchell spoke In opposition of request. Her opp:- sition to this request is she does not want to have to pay city taxes. Chair closed consideration. Mr. Sidor moved to recommend to City Council the 456 acres be annexed. Seccnded by Mr. Claiborne and unani- mously carried. (5-0) C. Approval of the preliminary plat of loth 1 and 21 La Colina Ranch Apartments Addition. Mr. Ellison explains preliminary plat is correct and the Development Review Committee recommends approval. Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried. (5-0) CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MBETINGI February 1, 1963 CITY COUNCIL AGENVA ITEM USE EXACT WORDING A Y TER I PLACED ON AGENDA) Consider adoption of a resolution acquiring 1.393 acres for right-of-way on Windsor Drive. SUMMARYt We are pur-hasing additional. land for right-of-way on Windsor Drive for the street paving pro;jcct. FISCAL SUMMARYt Coat to the City will be $220076.00 plus closing costs. Funds are available from the Bond Fund. ACTION RfEQUIREDt Council should approve the resolution and contract. ALTERNATIVESt Council could not approve the resolution and contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recc,mmends approval. EXHIBITSt i. Resolution II. Contract Y Ric 5vehla Assistant City Manager R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas has heretofore and authorized the extension and improvement of Windsor Drivej and WHEREAS, such street extension and improvement requires the acquisition of the land described herein; ' NOW, um roRe, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Denton hereby authorizes the acquisition of land In accordance with the Contract of Sale attached hereto, described as £ollowsr Tract lr All that certain 0.279 acre tract, or parcel of land s tuate in the B.B.B. 6 C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No,, 186, Denton County, Texasj said tract being part of a tract shown by dead to E, D. Headlae and recorded in Volume 878, Page 564 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as fo:lowsr BEOINNINO for the northeav.t corner of the tract being described herein at an iron set in the ground at the northeast corner of said 'Headlee Tract, said corner also being the northwest corner of a tract deeded to Tex Martin and recorded in Volume 762, Page 484 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas? THENCE south 2014159" west 27.13 feet to an iron pin set in the ground on the south line of proposed Windsor brine? THENCE north 88027127" west with the south line of said proposed road 442.62 feet to an iron pin set in the ground on the west line of said Headlee tract and the east line of a tract deeded to B. M. Ennis and recorded in Volume 1001, Page 542 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texasl THENCE north 02014159" east 27.71 feet to an iron pin set in the ground at the northwest corner of said Headlee tract; THENCE south 88022157" east. 442.61 feet to the point of beginning. .r CT 2r All that certain 1.046 acre tract, or parcol oe land s tLvat.a in the Thomas Tory Survey, Abstract No. 12811, and the S,B,H. s C,R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 106, a..' the N. H. Meis,34hoimer Survey, Abstract No. 810, Denton County, Texati; said tract being part of a tract shown by deed to E. C. Headleo and recorded in Volume 878, sago 567 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described herein at an iron pin set in the ground at the northeast corner of said Headlee Tracts THENCE south 01012149" west 167,30 feet to an iron pin found in the ground at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Section 4 of the Headlee Addttion to the City of Denton; THENCE north 88014147" west with the north line of Mesquite Street 49.93 feet to an iron pin found in the grruund at the northeast corner of Lot 11, Block. 1., Section 4 of the Headlee Additions Pt.aE ON3 THENCE north 01,112'49" east 137.49 feet to an iron pin not in the ground on the south line of proposed Windsor Drivet THENCE north 894,00132" west with the south line o£ said proposed road 1040443 feet to an iron pin set to the ground on the east line of Hinkle Drivet THENCE north 01"12149" east with the east line of said proposed road 41485 feet to an iron pin set in the ground at the northwest corner of said Headlee traott THENCE south 88020130" east 1090.36 feet to the point of beginning. at. 3i All that certain 0.068 acre traotr or parool of land situated in the B.B,B, i C,R,R, Co. survey, Abstraot No, 186, City and County of Denton, Texas) Saia traot being part'of a tract shown by deed to E. D. Headlee as recorded in Volume 878, Pagge 561 of the Deed Records of Denton County, 'rexas«said tract beim3 further described by metes and bounds as follower BEGINNING for the northwest corner of the tract biting described herein at an iron pin in Old Sanger Road at the northwest Cotner of said Headlee Tract, being also the northeast corner of tract shown by deed to Tex Martin as recorded in volume 7620 Page 484 of said Deed Records of Denton County, Texas) THENCE south 88021158" east 164.83 feet along, the north line of said Headlee Tract to an iron pin not at point of'inr.ersection with the southeasterly proposed right of way line oi' Windsor Drivet THENCE westerly 167.99 foot with arc of curve to right whose radius is 670,83 feet to an iron pin set at its interaectlon with tha western line of said Headlee Tract, chord bearing south 82012106" west 167,39 feett T4E'NCE north 2014159" east 27,43 feet to the place of beglnningi from E. Deats Headlee, and the Mayor is here4y authorized to execute said Contract of Sale and other documents necessary to such conveyance, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of January, 1983. RICr N- Ake • STE VART , KAY R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST) NARLOTTS MEN, CITY SECR TAkY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM C. J , TAYLOR, JR. , CITY A'T'TORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY, PAG:. 9'WO THE STATE OF TEXAS S CONTRACT OF EXCHANGE COUNTY OF DENTON S THIS AGREEMENT, by and betwuon E. DEATS HEADLEE, hereinafter called Gcantor, and thu CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called Grantee WITNESSETH, that the grantor agrees to grant and convey, and the grantee agrees to accept upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the following described coal propertyt Tract It All that certain 04279 acre tract, or parcel of land situated in the B.B.B, & C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 186, Denton County, Texast said traot being part of a tract shown by doed to E. D. Headlee and recorded In Volume 878, Page 564 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as followst BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described heroin at an iron pin set In the ground at the northeast corner of said Headlee Tract, said corner also being the northwest corner of a tract deeded to Tex Martin and recorded in Volume 762, Page 484 of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texast THENCE south 2014159" west 27,13 feet to an icon pill set in the ground on the south line of proposed Windsor Drivel THENCE north 88027127" west with the south line of said proposed road 442.62 feet to an iron pin set in the ground on the west line of said Headlee tract, and the east line of a tract deeded to B. M. Ennis and recorded !,n Volume 1001, Page 542 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas THENCE north 02014159" east 27.71 feet to an iron pin set in the ground at the northwest corner of said Headlee t'ractt THENCE south 88022157" east 442.61 feet to the point of beginning, :PACT 21 All that certain 1,046 acre tract, or parcel of land siLua c7 in the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract No. 1288, and ti,e B.B.B. & C,R.R. Co, Survey, Abstract No. L86, and the N. H. Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract No. 810, Denton County, Texas; said tract being part of a tract shown by deed to E. D. Headlee and recorded in Volume 878, Page 567 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as tollowst BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described herein at an iron pin set in the ground at the northeast corner of said Headlee Tract THENCE south 01012149" west 167.30 feet to an Iron pin found in the ground at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Section 4 of the Headlee Addition to the City of Dentont THENCE north 880141,17" west with the north line of Mesquite Street 49.93 feet to an iron pin found in the ground at the CONTRACT OF EXCHANGE-PACE ONE northeast corner of Got 11, Block 11 Section 4 of the Hoadleu Additions THENCE north 01°12'49" east 137.49 feet to an iron pin set in the ground on the south line of proposed Windsor Driver THENCE north 89000132" west with the south line of said proposed road 1040.43 feet to an iron pin set in the ground on the east line of Hinkle Drives THENCE north 01012149" east with the east line of said proposed road 41.85 feet to an iron pin set In the ground at the northwest corner of said Headleo tracts THENCE south 88020130" east 1090,38 feet to the point of beginning. Tract s All that certain 0.068 acre tract, or parcel of Sand s tuate in the 6.13.8, & C.R,R, Co, .4urve%, Abstract No. 186, City and County of Denton, Texasr said tract being pars, of a tract shown by deed to E. D. Headlee as recorded in vo'.voe 818, pa ye 561 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas said tract being further described by metes and bounds as followEi BEG I14NINO for the northwest corner of the tract being described herein at an iron pin in old Sanger Road at the northwest corner of said Headlee Tract, being also the northeast corner of tract shown by deed to Tex Martir, as recorded in volume 7t21 Page 484 of said Deed Records of Denton County, Texans THENCE south $8021158" east 164.83 feet along the north line of said Headlee Tract to an Iron pin set at point of intersection with the southeasterly proposed right of way line of Windsor Driver THENCE westerly 167,99 feet with arc of curve to right whose radius is 570,83 feet to an iron pin set at its intersection with the western line of said Headleo Tract, chord bearing south 82°12108" west 167.39 foetr THENCE north 2014'59" east 27.43 feet to the place of beginning. 1, Grantee is acquiring the real proprty doscribr.3 herein for the expansion and improvement of Windsor Drive in the City of Dentun, In consideration of Grantor conveying the property described ! heroin to Grantee, Grantee agrous to pay to Grantor Twenty-Two Thousand Seventy-Six Dollars ($22,076.00). The $22,076,00 cheer received will be endorsed and transfarrod to the City of Ceoto~ for the cost of water and sewer taps and pro-rata of sanitary sewer lines on Windsor Drive as Shown on the letter date) 12-28-82 from Earl Jones, comlrRACT OF %XCHANGE-PAGE TW 2. Grantee agrees to install and make all paving, curb, gu'.ter and drainige improvements adjacent to Grantor's propart/ without any Improvement assessments being made against Grantor or Grantor's land. 3. Grantee agrees to deposit on Grantor's property any excess excavated material taken or resulting from the street. Improvement work on the property adjacent to Seller's property. 4. The Crantor agrees to convey to Grantee marketable fee simple title to the property free and clear of all recorded and unrecorded liens, encumhrances, assessments, easements, leases and taxes except public easements and rights-of-way of record, 5. The Grantor agrees to execute and convey by grant deed, warranting title to the Grantee, the land described heroin upon payr nt of the amounts specified in 1. abuve, 6. Grantor warrants that there are no oral or written leases on all or any portion of the property, 7. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties and neither party relies upon any warrants or reprosentations not contained herein, in witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement this day of i Nuae 1983, i. E. DENTS HEADLEE, GRANTOR r. Cs / ✓c7 rt`_ F AF HEADLEF CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, GRANTEE BYi RICHARD O. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST CHARL TTE LEN, -CITY -8 ETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY i CONTRACT OF EXCHANGE-PAGE THREE f r CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: February It 1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA x M USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA) Ordinance accepting the dedication of street right-of-way. SUMMARY: Mr. E. Deats Headlee is proposing to dedicate this right-of=way for future extension of Carroll Boulevard. FISCAL SUMMARY: Not Applicable. ACTION REQUIRED: Council should approve the ordinance and dedication. ALTERNATIVES: Council could not approve the ordinance and dedication. S'T'AFF R83COMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval. EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance II. Street Dedication ck Svehla ASSIStant City Manager NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTINO THE DEDICATION HY DEED FROM E, DHATS HEADLES OF CERTAIN REAL PROPFC.Y SITUATED IN THE 8.8.0. 6 G.R.R. COMPANY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1861 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 878, PAOF $61 Or THE DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE USE OF SAID PROPERTY AS A PUBLIC STREET AND DECLARINO AN EFFECTIVE DAT8. THE COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. ,The City of Denton, Texas, hereby accepts the conveyance and dedication by deed from E. Donis Headlee of that certain real property situated in the B,B.D. 6 C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 561, Denton County, Texas, and recorded in "olune 878, Page 561 of the Deed Records of Denton County to the City of Denton, Texas, for the use of said property as a public street and for utilities, said property being more partioularly described as follows: All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the B,B.B. a C.R,R, Company Survey, Abstract No. 186, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Four M Developers, Inc, to E. Deato Headlee by deed dated March 9, 1978 and recorded In Volume 873, Page 561 of,, the Deed Record,; of Denton County, Texas and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said Headlee Tract, said point being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3 of the Headlee Addition; THENCE north 87040' west along the south boundary line of said Headlee Tract a distance of .100 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 20101 east 100 feet west of and parallel to the east boundary line a distance of 167,5 feet to a point for a cornarl THENCE south 870401 east along the north boundary line of said tract, a distance of 100 feet to the northeast corner of said Headlee Tract; THFNCE South 2018' west along the east boundary line of said Head lee tract a distance of 167.5 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0.385 acres of land, more or less, PAGE ONE t SECTION II, The City of Denton hereby accepts the conveyance and dedication of the real property describod in Section I hereof for the purposes of a public street and for utilities. SECTION III, The mayor of the city of Denton is hereby authorized to sign the instrument of street dedication executed by e, Deats Headlee, accepting such dedication and the oonditiona therein on behalf of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION IV. The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton is hereby authorized and direetod to let the real property herein dedicated be designated as a public street on the Official Map of the City of Denton, Texas, SEC'T'ION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passago and approval, PASSEb AND APPROVED this the day of February, 2993. RICtARD 0. STEJART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR.Ni C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY I 246E PAGE TWO THE STATE of TEXAS s 8?'RE1;T DEDICAT{ON COUNTY OF DENTON S That I, E. Doats HeaoleeI hereinafter known an Grantor, for and in consideration of the mutual advantage to acorue to the Grantors and the City of Denton do by these prosents dedicate to the use of the public and the City of Denton, Texas, for the purpose of streets and utilities the following described property to-wits All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the 8,0,8, s C.R,R, Comoany Survey, Abstract No. 186, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Four M Developers, Ina, to E, Doats Headlee by deed dated March 91 1978 and recorded in Volume 878, page 561 of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeast oornor of said Headlea Tract, said point being the northwest corner of Lot It Block 3 of the Headlee Addition THENCE north 87040' west along the south boundary line of said Headlee Tract a distance of 100 feet to a point for a cornerr THENCE north 2018' east 100 feet west of and parallel to the east boundary line a distance of 161.5 feet to a point for a corners THENCE south 87040' east along the north boundary line of said tract, a distance of 100 feet to the northeast corner of said Headlee Tractr THENCE south 21118' west along the east boundary line of said Headlee tract a distance of 167,5 feet to the place of beginning and containing 0,385 acres of land, more or loss, The recitation of consideration herein is for the purpose of providing consideration as required by law to cause this dedication to be effective and binding on all parties hereto. It is i,;tended that the grant and dedication made herein is a gift to the public and it is contemplated the Grantors herein will claim for income tax purposes a deduction of Twenty Eight Thousand Three Hundred Eighty-Five and Nu/100 ($28,385.0d) Collars which is the reasonable fair cash market value of the land embraced within this dedication. This dedication does not in any way enhance the value of any other property now owned by said grantor, This dedication is further upon the expreas condition that the City of Denton shall construct upon uald property a paved, curbed and guttered street at its solo expense having a minimum width of six (6) lanes and this portion of the street will not be opened to the public until that portion of Carroll Boulevard, from Sherman Drive to this right-of-way dedication is widened to six (6) lanes. TO HAVE ANd TO HOLD the hareinbafort described property to the public and the City of Denton, Texas, for streets and utilities forever. WITNESS my hand this ~ day of"." 19-IL9 . J 1?,d. r . U .AT H ' DL'E THE STATE OF TEXAS S COUNTY OF DENTON S This instrument was acknowledged before me on the " day of 19M, by E. Deats Headlee. y~y U own iH4T h W ~3Y, TEXAS NA %4. 14o DENTUN COUNTY, My Commission expirest _ x.34 i ,1 01 N Wry of VffNr0N, r&XAS MUNICIPAL WILDINO / DSN70N, 7EXAS 16201 ~ T LEPHON.6 017,+ 5668200 MEMORANDUM T0: 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE: January 25, 1983 SUBJECT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM After several months of research concerning economic and industrial development possibilities for the City of Denton, it is apparent that there are many alternatives available to us depending upon the extent of our resources and the directi~,n of the City Council. Attached are specific recommendations regarding, an economic development strategy for Denton that has been developed for your consideration. I have found that the promotion of economic growth aid development varies across the country, Many cities have no economic development program, while others have developed very elaborate programs including hosted tours of their cities and full-time travelling represcsntatives. Most of the cities that do have an economic development department work very closely with their chambers of commerce. Many cities have worked with their chambers to institute a private non-profit corporation through which they operate to buy land for industrial park:;, offer loans to businesses, advertise in national publications, produce inforo ation packet's for prospects and conduct tours to target areas of the country promoting their city. Usually the city, the county and the private sector fund such organizatons. In Denton we have Greater Denton Industl^ie5, which 'is a privately funded corporation that purchases land for the purpose of promoting economic development in the City. The original intent of this corporation was to set up an industrial park with the necessary facilities already available to industrial and commercial prospects. Due to a lack of funding, this development project, has not been realized. Currently, the group has one remaining lot. Some cities with whom we visited suggE:~,ted that we conduct a community analysis before instituting an economic; development program, in order that we be aware of problems that need to be solved in our community before attracting new business. Such analysis could involve a survey of the businesses in Memorandum to G. Chris Hartung Economic Development January 19, 1983 Page Two Denton with five or more employees, The respondents would be asked to provide helpful comments concerning the problems that they have encountered in doing business in our community. They could also provide suggestions for improvements, along with a discussion of the reasons for their location in Denton, While realizing the constraints of our budget, and knowing the City Council's priorities, 1 am recommending that we consider the implementation of an Economic Development Program with the following goals: • Identifying attractive industrial sites;, • Attracting potential industrial and conunercial newcomers to Denton; • Providing complete and accurate information to prospects by attempting to eliminate conflicting instructions on development procedures; This may be achieved through the use of a project management checklist which would outline each step of the process along with appropriate department indicators and fees; (See attached example) ♦ Organizing the process of the dissemination of information to serious business prospects to avoid the often conflicting duplication of efforts needthe ed Ci ty, available school location; and other utilities to make the The above goals could be accomplished through several means. I have listed a few of these for your consideration: • A colorful quality of life brochure will be developed and used to advertise the City to visitors and to potential prospects; • A detailed factbook will be compiled and made available to prospects who have shown a serious interest in the area; • A slide show presentation will be produced and made available for presentation to metroplex reactors and potential business prospects who have not yet considered our City for relocation purposes; • A reception will be given to provide business prospects, realtors and other interested persons with an opportunity to meet and talk to informed local business and community leaders regarding the possibilities of relocating in Denton; • Contact Barworth Corporation regarding plans for the development of a 400 acre industrial rail park (West Park) n(.xt to Brik Pak; • Consider development of additional industrial site packages; Memorandum to G, Chris Hartung Economic Development January 19, 1983 Page Three All aspects of the program will serve to acquaint newcomers to Uenton's great potential as a rapidly growing, progressive community. With the implementation of the above goals we would begin a purposeful, well planned campaign to attract commercial and industrial prospects to our City. It is our intent to design inuivi'dual project work plans for each part of the Economic Development Program. we will make a cooperative effort to coordinate our research activities and work plans with those of the Chamber to every possible extent on this project. Chuck Carpenter has expressed enthusiasm and support for 'his effort. It is recommended that the Red Board fonds be made available for the funding of this project. Possibly, cooperative funding cooed be obtained from the Chamber and other community organizations. We would seek the financial and technical assistance of the Convention and Visitors bureau in putting on the reception and preparing exhibits. I have outlined each phase of the proposed ;conomic Development Program in the following pages for your review. 1 have also incluied an estimated budget proposal for the program, and a list of the cities contacted with their ideas on how to attract businesses to their area, It is my further recommendation that once we receive authoi^ization from the City Council, I will meet again with Chuck Carpenter and begin ;nunediately to develop work plans for the implementation phase. We would also plan to meet with the Chamber Economic Development Committee to gain their input, i will also set up a meeting with Newton Rayzor, Jr. to explore any mutually beneficial potentials. Please let me know if you need further inforniation. 6Z4A4~-*~ Betty MCKeffli Assistant City Manager bMcK/vvw Attachments: Sumary of Recommendations Summary of Economic Development Programs Proposed Expenditures Project Management Checklist 0814M Sunmary of Economic Uevelopment Programs In Various Cities Page Pour Marketing Techniques: Advertise in national puhlications: Area Development Sites and Facility Planning ana Plant Site aPark$, , Target areas o the country w,^r( Industries are located that may want to move. Spend a few days in target cities. Send a letter and information package to prospects that show interest, Sponsor a host visit to Pueblo when prospects are serious. 100 COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA . POPULATION 11.,61 Economic Development Corporation, a private, non-profit organization, Marketing Techniques: Had a s1-1de show several years ago to help them get started. It was very helpful in introducing themselves. Have just put together a handbook of information for prospects. They concentrate on developing their downtown area to attract new businesses, They are currently working on a twenty (20) story, 500,OOU square foot office building; the relocation of railroad tracks; and the construction of a river front park, 0814M SUMMARY OF R 'COWENDATJONS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM BACKGROUND, The City Council has proposed that one of the major goals to be accomplished this year is to study different methods of increasing revenues for the City. It was established that economic growth and development within the City would greatly increase revenues. Following this contention, a study has been conducted for the past several months to determine how the City might attempt to increase economic growth in the area. We have also been aware that a problem exists in the handling of the dissemination of information to serious business prospects, The industrial client comes to Denton and is faced with a maxo of procedures And processes which in the past have not been clearly defined. In order to be on the leading edge of industrial/commercial sites, we must first be able to provide those potential newcomers with the information that they require in a professional manner, Many cites in Texas and the Southern United States have been contacted and asked to send any information that they have available on how they attract businesses to their area, Research has also been conducted to gather pertinent information needed by business prospects when making a decision concerning relocation of their company, An effort has been made to collect data from the Chamber and City departments to produce a comprehensive and useful document that will present a progressivo image of Denton, SUMMARY Or RECOMMENDATIONS,, The following recommendations are prov=ided for your consideration; 1. We recommend that a short, colorful pamphlet or brochure of 4-6 pages be compiled in order to interest potential prospects in moving to Denton. This short brochure would be an introduction to the quality of life aspects of Denton, highlighting our a:,sEas and encouraging the reader to respond by returning a perforated card "or more in-depth information. The brochure would include short narrative sections with illustrations on land availability, industry, housing, education, the labor force and recreation. In many instances this brochure would be the reader's first contact with the City of Denton, It must then, give a polished presentation of the dynamics of the City and impress the reader enough to motivate a response. 2. We recommend that a larger, more detailed factbook be compiled containing statistical information and narrative sections on demographics, the labor force, economic factors, utility rates and availability, transportation and zoning requirements, This factbook would be used to provide complete and accurate information to prospects who have shown a serious interest is our area, This publication will eliminate duplication and often conflicting efforts by the different entities, i.e., the Chamber, Lone Star Gas, General Telephone, Denton Independent School Oistrict, and will present a unified picture of the City to business prospects. The factbook Summary of Recommendations Page Two would also be made available to any other interested persons for a fee. We have completed 8U% of the research for this document. The proposed design would include options for quick updates without a great deal of expense. Along with the handbook would be provided a project management checklist. This list would outline every step needed to be taken by a new industry or business to become established in Denton, attached is a sample of a project management checklist which is used by the City of Knoxville, Tennessee, to assist developers and investors through the often complex development process, 3. The third phase of our economic development strategy involves the production of a slide show.which will include a ten minute entertaining tour of the City and provide information that would*be of interest to viewers who are not familiar with the area, The show will be used to advertise Denton to those business prospects who have not yet considered us as a desiraole alternative for relocation, It would also be used to focus on the advantages of our proximity to the Dallas-Ft. Worth area. Additionally, we could use the slide show to encourage Denton civic groups to participate in and contribute to our economic development program, Should the slide show be coordinated by a professional audio-visual agency, it would be done in such a way that would enable us to use the show in various formats. It would be a portable show which can be shown with one projector or several projectors, as the need may be, It is planned to convert the show to a video tape presentation, which could also be mailed to seriously interested prospects. 4. The grand finale to our economic development campaign will be an entertaining and informative event scheduled tentatively in July of 1983. We will hold a reception for industrial and commercial prospects, metroplex realtors and local businessess and community leaders. The reception will consist of a presentation of our proposed slide show, along with the introduction of Denton as a city ready and prepared for economic growth and development. We are considering having the auditorium in the Civic Center set up as an exhibition with information packets available to interested guests. These packets would contain the proposed quality of life brochure, a copy of the factbook, and other pamphlets from the Chamber, the Denton educational facilities, the Greater Uenton Arts Council, and the relevant City Departments, and other community agencies, Throughout the reception, a prevailing theme would emerge; "There's no place like Denton". From the designing of the invitations to the specially created atmosphere at the Civic Center the guests will have the feeling that they have entered thf! "Emerald Cityt of Oz (Denton), Our intent is to create an enjoyable evening with music and food that will ensure that our guests will not forget us when it comes to relocation considerations, 0814M PROPOSED EXPENDITURES* FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ITEM QUANTITY COST 1, Quality of Life, Brochure 3,000 $ 91000 2. Industrial Factbook 500 $ 6,000 3. Slide Show $10,000 4, Reception 300 guests $ 4,500** $29,5OU * 'these figures could go up or down depending on the decision of the City Council regarding the scope and sophistication of the program, **This figure could be significantly reduced by financial assistance of the Convention and Visitors Bureau, 0814M-8 1UMMA!2Y„~F C4 OM10 VI OPMEM. T . ~20G IN KT --CITIES 1, CORPUS CHRISTI - POPULATION 231,999. B Hess 0 me t Commission, a private, non-profit organization. ai er anc y work oge er, Buayec; $325,000 annually. Marketing Techniques 'end advertising to target industries, Send brochures and detailed factbook to interested prospects. Host luncheon for prospects. Attend trade shows, Show a six (b) minute film on Corpus Christi to prospects. Travel to target areas and host luncheons for prospects, 2, FARMERS BRANCH - POPULATION 33,101 City Marketing Departments Have begun to work with Chamber, Budgets over $45,000, Marketing Techniques: Provide a packet of information to ir, erested industries. Have a slide show presentation for business groups (dQaling with history, demographics, projections for the future - 15 min, long), Advertise in several business magazines, 3, MIDLAND - POPULATION 70,5'l5 Chamber of Commerce, Industrial Committee. Budget: City of Midland provides $130,000 to the total budget, Marketing Techn.~i ques ; dvertising in national publications, Send quarterly mail-outs to target industries, Have a slide show presentation for business groups, 4, PLANO - POPULATION 72,331 Chamber of Commerce, Industrial Development Authority. Budget; City provides $40,000 to total budget, Marketing Techniques; resentt Fa`cfbook to prospects. Show an eight (8) minute multi-slide projector presentation (a)so available on videotape), i Summary of Economic Development Programs In Various Cities Page Two 5. WAXAHACHIE - POPULATION 15,000 Chamber f Commerce, Economic Development; Cooperative effort between U y an Amber. Marketing Te~'h_ni_y_ues: t~ ona~ uct a Community Analysis to discover the assets and weaknesses of the commmunity for attracting new businesses. Ruy advertising in the Industrial Handbook publishd by the fast and West Texas Chambers. Go on tours sponsored by the Chamber and sell the area first, then the City. Supply complete and accurate information to prospects, 5. TUCSON, ARIZONA - POPULATION 296,457 Tucson Economic Development Corporation, a private, non-profit corpOrat on. Budget; City provides $100,OOU County provides $100,000 Private Sector provides 50 0TOTAL 322M',16-60-66 Marketing Techniques: Own and operate an industrial park. Provide a FDA small business loan program, 7. VISALIA, CALIFORNIA,- POPULATION 53,OOU Economic Development Corporation, a private, non-profit organization. Chamber and City work together. Budget: funding comes from City and County. Marketing Te~chni u-e-s. Offer FDA loans to businesses. . Advertise to promote County. . Have put together a brochure on quality of life, Have a factbook that they send to interested prospects. The City of Visalia, California has just begun their Economic Development Program. The steps taken to begin the program are as follows: 1. The City Council adopted a resolution to promote economic development in the area. They wrote an Outline of Intent which states that the City will grow by established guidelines. I Summary of economic Development Programs in Various Cities Page Three 2. corporationdthatncouldsbuyland developelands offernloans,t conduct research and do advertising., 3, The Economic Development Corporation conducted a Conrrnunity Analysis survey, Industries with five or more employees were surveyed to find out about existing problems in the community that might hinder business developVisaliaSolutions are found for the problems. (For Example: that there was a shortage of workers for one type of industry. They contacted the Community College there, which now offers the necessary training.) 4. A technical data book was compiled to send to interested prospects. 5. They put together a short, colorful brochure with small narrative sections and pictures on land availability, housing, the labor force, industry and quality of life, brochure has Chamber perforated g,ALB U UER UE NEW MEXICO - POPULATION 2179,401 Albu uer ue industrial Oevelo ment Service, a private, non-profit organizat on, Bud et: $100,000 annuall for advertisin . U T p'Jb is relations articles in the press) U VIN 011 $ 10,000 on direct mail $ 40,000 on advertising in publications Marketin Techni es: ne member of the staff travels twenty-five percent (25% o the time to target areas. Personl contact with potential prospects is the most effective marketing strategy. Show a videotape of the area to prospects. Send brochures to target industries. 9. PUEBLO COLORADO - POPULATION 125 000 Pueblo Economic Development Corporation, a private, non-profit organ zat on. Budget: $325,000 annually. 725 private industries pay $1,000 each annually to fund the Corporation. The City and County add $200,000 annually. ,r PROJECT MANA09MENT CHECKLIST The City of Knoxville and Knox County encourage Industrial, commercial, resldeitlal and other forms of economic development In the community. This checklist has been designed to assist devel- opers and Investors as they work through the development process, It outlines the regulatory steps necessary In the process, Identifies the government agencies involved and references ordinances and other regulations, Not all of the steps In the checklist will apply to any ppe project. Staff of the Metropolitan Planning Commission and City and County departments will help In determining those steps which apply to a particular project, This checklist is being published by the Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission In oonjunotion with an Economic Development packet containing: ".Economic Development Informa- tlon Guide," "Economic Overview," and "Knoxville's.Center City Prospectus," KNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION ^ ^1111,111110401 MANAanMOW CHOOKU$T HPmta W111♦~6 ~ ~ tj~ ' xMedM6 ~ A , 3 ow M d M ) ~ ontul , • KFIM 00WIlll i xtwtlrW61KMD cow*j • • AIrrr.l+M t f f o...«+t ~!:=Trw orD M too" PDPw« ''D 1. M fall NI f M i 61DM t1Pr,►w { IMM Cwntlnutq S IIDDI L"44110011 Clan i DO♦ID"Dt M 00661*01 MI um M1 alwow 1 1 FAD I~IFMI f Poll 6404 1 W M M.,D,. ! 1 x x IIw t19A41004 DtuMt ID♦Itlldl w 6aw stANio" t, t 1 I saftl comw IFMI - f. P" a s ePr Dr row x ~ b MtHM Pw" AC4N In 1 t. 6ul"MA OW" PWh ' u A co"" D*w Pon X X % 2 22 1. swmd PIA61 h.+ 10. FID„.,n Pnd C1rIx,CM,OA x % 11. tiaK nDa t tNItW rnl uM l' 611006111,111 la V CIAO Ap lot Alo" ,np I F40) 1{ 1 00F 74-0-re-* l X V 60N11116 PAt WDrID'M 4'' 1 I WanA AOauLIMn X I f xl It x I VI VW4000 M 2"" *m maw" 1 1. AD 101 ewld", PDflnn f. JN PIOIkA II OMM IFwi f PdD1 SUM AM x 61 lftw MIX % 6. Pu64 "W 7. tp1MDlnrD tMY,rp IN DOPMMdI IPM X , I- I CON omy A a +nlewa~ Pmlhn ::n I I t ray PDtalen a an,w IFwI 1. ►wte C. Pv*W Dlwllnq S. CMM Court ACtMh 111 PDODPMdI Izz YII Pw,nw Pht cot '1' 1 c1 on 1 S Dmil hDnF 10 PII A WK x % t. ew101n PPlmd tgwO If A DOM+w % 5 1,44m111 Imam to LO WY 1.1CMJW cOmfw*m: 4AM NAU I, PiumDl , FNn11CDl Ind ON X •CuiD 0011 A" PDIIM X D. InI MCI IOM Maw I. CDIp6U14p Of OCCNMncy lYWd x COUnly Only WII euwm LAMMD' 1 AOD~1lDLLM IFM F1 11 l! f. AtMt/Mtnl % t IX lwn Dnd F" p IIIMIMMD,nW AputIPllHnY t " 1 sotlAcDWile011e 0,w 1 Au GYDIAr ~ CITYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Charlotte Allen, City Secretary DATE; January 27, 1983 SUBJECT; APPEARANCE OF CHUCK CARPENTER Chuck Carpenrer, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, will give an oral report of the recent Chamber activities. No written back-up infor- mation is available at this time, Mar otte n, ity secretary CA rvvw n 6 .T? ~ I~ CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: February 1, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent agenda SUBJCET: Bid N 9085 Distribution Transformers SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of distribution transformers to replace inventory stocks and to fulfill new construc- tion and maintenance requirements, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funds for the purchase of these transformers will come from the 1982-83 budget account 610-008.0252-9222-E368 Electric Distribution Line Transformers, RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder as follows: Item H Quan, Vendor Price/Ea Total Price 1. None No longer needed 2. 30 Cummins Supply $ 989.00 $29,670.00 3, 10 Priester Supply $ 1.,I95.00 511,950.00 4, 4 Priester Supply $ 3,393.00 $13,572.00 5. None No longer needed 6. 3 Tepco $13,110.00 $39,330.00 7. 15 Jerry's Elect, $ 187.00 S 2,805.00 8. 15 Jerry's Elect, $ 238.00 S 3,570.00 9. 20 Alamo $ 324,00 S 61480.00 Our evaluation is based on a comparison of the initial cost, and the operating cost spread over an average lifetime expectancy for each type of transformer, EXHIBITS: Tabulation s eet, SUBMITTED BY: Toni 0, Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent N1U 4 906 Page 1 of 2 RID TITLE Distribution Transformers 0PK,NP,b 1/6/83 Tepco SESCO Cuulmins Jerry's Alamo WESCO IJ, A. lhliesnberry ACCOUNT # 610-008-025M22M36A Supply Electric Tra n s fo rm, p PX, Y 1 U(i Q~31' 451 r YUHM UIt v AND o V NUOK Vr R ~yF:NPOtl NUOFt ~IrNUO I 1, 20 25 KVA 629.00 621.00 525.00 679.00 f w .00 _ 2, 30 50 KVA 1,328.00 989.00 1,120100 L 048,00 ~ 3. 10 75 KVAu~~y 11700.00 15163.00 _ 1,420.00 '46.00 4. 4 150 KVA 31494.00 2,863.00 _ 3,999,00~ 6. 4 750 KVA 11,116,00 9,352,00 81340,00 10,277,00` u _6. 3 1,500 KVA 4 _ 13,110,00 139527.00 14,106400 13,34(.00 77- Manufacturer porter SESCO Howard WESCO ritra Mrs"lonay 7R 15 1O'KVA _ 268.00 y280.00 187,00 234,00 8R 15 15 KVA 291.00 '318,00 238.00 266.00 9R 10 25 KVA 362.00 388.00 345.00 324.00 ~W~ FOB Denton Denton Denton Denton Uetnon Denton 'Ifernton , Nip N 9085 P e t of 2 HID TITLK- Distribtuion Transformers OP8148D 1/6/83 Priester Sunbolt Priester GIE. Temp Io Tenpia ACCOUNT # 610-000-0252-9222-E368 Supply Co, Trans, Supply Supply 2 N 1 )0 V~'Uk VL UOR _ YR_ VRNDU VP:N!)Ok~ 1, 20 25 KVA 602,00 _ 615.00 610.00 503.00 2, 30 60 KVA 11103,00 971.00 1,217,00 11210.00 3. 10 75 KVA 1,450,00__ - 1,195.00 1,350.00 1,340,00 4. 4 150 KVA 31393,00 41390,00 4,739.00 45716,00 42300.00 5. 4 750 KVA 8,592,00 10,520.00 9,583,00 9,535,00 10,300,00 6, 3 1,500 KVA _ 12,989,00 15,495.00 15,666.00 159590.00 15,175,00 Chan^$ Manufacturer RTE "D" G.E G.E. __Square Square °D" 7R 15 10 KVA 324,00 _ R 8R 15 15 KVA 374.00 9R 10 25 KVA 470,00 FOB _ Denton `Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING, February 1, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent Agenda SUBJECT; Bid #9086 Capacitors & Racks SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of 10 pieces of 200KVAR capacitors and racks. These items are used by the Electric Disthibution Department and the Electric Metering & Substation Depart- ment in the maintenance and construction of the electric distribution system, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funds for this purchase will come from 1982-83 budget funds account 610-008-0252-9219-E365, RECO14MENDATION: We recommend the items bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification of Temple, Inc., #1 in the amount of $2,280,00 each, Total bid price of $22,800.40, FOB Denton, delivery in 70 days, EXHIBITS: Tabulation sheet. SUBMITTED BY: Tom D, Shaw, C, .M, Assistant Purchasing Agent i NIP Capacitors OP$N 1 PrIester Priester Nilson Cunmins Temple Temple O,E. Suppl NESCO ACCOUNT 1 610.00.0252.92194365 I_ _T`..'M MEOMs'" Y&NDOR -M.9 -K D-OAL VPFl>~1t" ENDOR UOW 10 200 KVAR Capacitors 3,660.00 31398,00 3,488.00 39473,00 2,280.00 3,530.00 2,321,00 3,575.00 a CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: February 1, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid k 908? Sale of Refuse Truck SUMMARY: This bid is for the sale of City of Denton unit number 1940, a rear loading refuse truck. The truck was damaged by fire and is uneconomical to repair, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval, by council and award of bid. ALTERNATIVE: Reject all bids and rebid. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funds from the sale of this vehic]Q will be credited to Motor Pool replacement account-and utilized toward the purchase of a new refuse truck. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the highest bidder of Jack Brown Sales, in the amount of $3,789,00, EXHIBITS: Tabulation s0et. SUBMITTED BY: Tom D. Saw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent sit) a sops f KID TI-TIA Sale of Refuse Truck ' Jack Brawn Environment 1 oeENRD 1/6/83 Sales Sates & Service ACCOUNT ri V myITS 1. SCRIPTZON VENDOR VENDOR VENVOB ?OR VENDOR VENUOR 11 ENDOR 1 1 Sale of Refuse Truck 31789.00 11250.00 r f i' CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING; February 1, 1983 COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM # Consent agenda SUBJECT; Bid N 9093 Renovation of Heating, Air Conditioning and Ventilation at Central Fire Station SUMMARY; This is a rebid of our bid number 9066 that was recently rejected by the council We received three bids as shown on the tabulation sheet of this bid, compared to six bids received on bid 9066. We changed the specification for this bid which requires a bond guaranteeing the equipment bid was equal to that specified and was compatible in every respect to the existing compressors and heat pumps. You will note the amounts on this bid are slightly higher than tho previous bid. This bid also includes one year full maintenance on the purchased equipment and material and on the equipment furnished by the City of Denton. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNDS; Fire department. RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder DenTex Air Conditioning for the total amount of $11,463.16, with 30 working days for completion. EXHIBITS; Tabulation sheet. r SUBMITTED BY; ohi"J l'l1arsha , C.P.M. Purchasing Agent Rln N, 9093 r Otp TITU, RenoYa~f Heat, Air Cund, t OPENED 1/20/83 Work DenTex Air COS Environment Conditionin Mechanical ACCOUNT # _Fire Dept, Systems QCY, ITEM UE,gTION VENUOI3__ _ 1H, Of' _ _ VENDOR T VENDOR VGNUOEt V9Y 0a.-_ 1. Lot Renovation 24,488.00 10,928.16 12,900.00 t 2. Lot Bonds R Maintenance 1,962.00 505,00 500,00 Total bid 26,440.00 11,463,16 13,400,00 Manufacturer Carrier Payne Carrier Total amount of Bid N 9066 24,488,00 10,928,16 11,900.00 L DJ-3) CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL. BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 RFMQRAN D UhL TO. The Mayor and Members of th3 City Council ''ROM: Bill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant. DATEt January 26, 1983 SUBJEC'1't Police Building tenovation project Bids. On January 14, 1983 we opened bids for twelve items relating to the Police Building Renovation Project. At the January 18, 1983 City Council Meeting six of these bids were awarded to the low bidders and one contract was approved for the drywall work on the project. The architect on the project and the staff have completed the evaluation of the remaing bids and offer the following reconunendations. Bid 4909" Lath and Plaster (one bidder) Alvin Ellis, . . . . $17,200 Accept. Bid 09098 Ceramic Tile (one bidder) Alvin Ellis. . . . . $21,800 Accept. Rid 09101 Lockers (one Bidder) Lato Sales. $6,010 Accept, The Architect on the project has reviewed each of these items and has determined that the bid prices are reasonable based upon the cost of materials and labor. We have received no 'aids on the remaining items which includes Bid 49099 and Sid WA. Therefore we have solicited for proposals on these items and have; determined the necessary course of action. Bid 09099 Wood boors two telephone quotations wero received on this item. Custom Win-Dor of Forth Worth has offered to provide the wood doors at a cost of $3,872.40. Buell Door Company of Dallas has quoted a price of $5,611,85 for the same items. We reconunend that the Council approve the issuance of a purchase order to win-Dor in the amount of $3,872,40. Police Building Renovation Project Bids January 26, 1983 Page 2 Bid 49104 Venthood - Only one proposal was received an this item. The proposal received was from the Taylor Division of American Desk Manufactors, Tnc. in the amount of $2,637, Since this proposal was less than $3,000, wo have issuod a purchase order for this .item. The attached letters from Gerald Stone provide a few more details on these items, Should you have viny que-C.,tions or comments on these items, ple-.tse let us know. Respectfully submitted, Bill Angelo Attachments: Letters from Gerald Stone Tab sheets BA/vn CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS .January 20, 1983 Bill Angelo Assistant City Manager liunicipal Building Denton, TN 76201 RE. Police Department Dear Billi Since we had only one bid on the 'Pile and Lathing and Plastering, I have accumulated some data to validate or invalidate the attractiveness of Alvin Ellis' bids, The b.eakdown of these trades are as follows, I, Ceramic Tile 764 S.F. Ceramic Tile Floor @ 5.75 - $4,393, 113 L.F. Ceramic Tile Base @ 5.75 - 650. 934 S.F. Unglazed Tile Floor @ 6.00 - 5,604. 53 L.F. Unglazed 'Pile Base @ 6.00 n 318, 1488 S.F, Unglazed Tile Base @ 5,50 -$19,149. %4hen the price of a performance and bid bond is added to this, the total is very close to his bid of $21,800. 11, Lathing and Plastering 196 S.F. Exterior stucco @ 5.00 $ 980. 70 S.F. Soffit @ 4.00 - 1554 S.F. Interdor plaster @ 4,00 m 6,216. Miscellaneous patchwork - 2,800. 1953 S.F. Skim plaster @ 2.75 = 5,371, $15,647, When thr price of a performance and bid bond is added to this, the total is also very close to his bid of $17,200, OERALD E. STONE ELL L SA RUSSELL L. GATES 842 308 N, CARROLL DENTON, TEXAS 16202.1985 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS ,,ago 2 I feel comfortable with the unit cor+ts I i.c,va used abbvo, and have ~,heeked the quanti tins of work to be done caref'.11.ly, hence I cannot (atilt eif.her of Alvin Cllia' bids, The misfortune of 'T'aylor-Ball's allocation for this work being :insufficient creates the problam, However I do not want the Project to suffer from the lack of this dock, so I am recommending that both bids be accepted, Yours very truly, 1'~4k~ Gerald Stone CS/pm GERALD E. STONE RUSSELL L. BATES 308 N. CARROLL DENTON, TEXAS 76202.1985 (817)383.1842 i CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Bill Angela January 25, 1983 Assistant City Manager City of Denton Service Center Denton, TX 76201 121;f t Police Department Dear Billi The following Bids were riot dealt with 4t the last City Council meeting, pending my gathering additional iriformationr Bid #9101 Lockers Bid 09099 Wood Doors Bid 09104 Venthood We are distributors for Lyon Lookers and are in a position to validate the attractiveness of the Lato bid of $ 6 0 1 0 for B i d #9101. Lyon Lockers would have cost $6890, therefore we recommend Lato's bid be taken. Wood Doors, via telephone quotation from Custom Win-Dor of Fort Worth will cost $3872.40, as over against the telephone quote of $5611.85 from Buell Door Co, of Dallas. We recommend Custom Windor's bid of $3872.40 for Bid #9099. Only one quotation was received for the Venthood, which is a specialty item. That bid was $2637, from Taylor D i v i s i on of American Desk Co. of Taylor, TX. We recom- mend that this bid for Bid #9104 be approved. Sinc rely, Gerald Stone GERALD E. STONE RUSSELL L. BA'T'ES 308 N. CARROLL DENTON, TEXAS 762021985 (817)3831842 BID N _ 9097 BID Loth & Plastor - Ellis OPHN 1-1A-83 ACCOUNT ITER D1; C I IO -VENDOR 5 D VLMR 1 17,200,0 BID 9098 DID Ceramic 'Pile OPEN 1-14-83 ~ Ellis ACCOUNT 1 OTYq Y ~x T ON -V 5R- 7-RIN DO R 1 21,800.00 13 k C) 9 101 BID Lookers, Shelves & Beetches OPEN 11-14.83 Lato Sales ACCOUN'T' I `~3f, °l+HSCR 69-- VENDOR Ok VENDOR --v8NOOR -V V A~3 Ei .14-D6R CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM OATE OF MEETING; February 1, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid N 9110 Sale of Lathe & Drill Press SUMMARY; This bid is for the sale of surplus machine swp equipment. Item number one (1) is a metal lathe and item number two (2) is a large drill press. The two pieces of lquipment are no longer utilized by the City of Denton Machine Shop. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funds from the sale of this equipment will to applied toward additional equipment and improve- ments to the new Machine Shop. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the highest bidder, Machine Tool & Repair, Inc, in the amunt of $5,102.00 for the lathe and $200.00 for the drill press, Machine Tool & Repair, Inc, will pick the equipment up within 10 days of award, EXHIBITS: Tabulatio heet. SUBMITTED BY: Tom D. aw, . Assistant Purchasing Agent BID N 9110 STD TITLE Sale of lathe & brill Press OPHNRD 1/25/83 Machine Nnerican Tool Machine ACCOUNT N Tool ,~,r ITEM DESC9,;VT1QN__ VM JENDOR VENDOR VENDOR 1113NDOR_ 1, t Lathe 5,102,00 21600.00 2. 1 grill Press 200.00 175.00 W CIIPY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM T03 Rick Nvehla FROMI Jerry Clark DATH,: January 24, 1983 SUBJECT: Balance of Northridge Drainage The Balance of Northridge Drainage was given final acceptance on January 19, 1983 with 9 working days remaining of the 20 allowed. The Contractor made a very good effort to work with Moore Construction who is completing L-he majority of the Northridge project. Most of the major patches were put in right after the storm sewer work was completed. Final Contract price is $20,485.25 which is a 2.28 cost savings from the bid of $20,936.50. Jerr at , EIT Seniors Civil. Engineer MONTHLY HSTIMATe ype. of Stork AIZ~IkAep G Ratimate No. 0 Q 1 Ir r xoject Name 4aL4t'~ ' ' aVoY ' I Contract Awavoed From~~ To Contract Amount 'Z U. 6-a stima►ted Pexiod.._...~7 _ Prom i ~.L.: ,19 , to ~9",f-? 19 Calendar ~Days ontractor l Allotted Used,____,_,., 6M DSSCRIPTI N UNIT gAff r ~ PRI~ Ah1QUNT 77A ut, . S Y. j N J/ v o wa . 'G M.v SLSfta1 .l Q- Al- 1% 7,n kv -i- Total Amount, • ' $ Rrtified s Correct ' t Phis extra Work 1c,& Total Amount Of Work bone $ 2 t ~ 30 • 2 ~ . pproved . Q% ,I-%.,.., ( Usst A- Less % Retained $ ~ ate 19~1 Difference $ rGo; ¢95. 2 Less Previous Payments , $ L7. 75-1 + Z' O Amount Due This Estimate $ 733 CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA IIALK-- S -gUffffT Meeting Dates February 1, 1983 City Council Agenda Item # Subjecti Approve the final plat of block 11 Lakewood Estates. Summaryr This is the one ..1ot• plat of the Lakewood Estates Mobile Home Park located along the east side of Fm 2181 and on the north side of Robinson Road. The plat consists of approximately 84 acres of land and provides no right-of-way dedication for Loop 283. Action Requiredi Approve the plat, Alternatives: 1, Approve the plat. 2. 'Cable the plat for consideration at the next City Council meeting. Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval by a vote of 5-0 becziuse no subdivision of land has taken place. Exhibits: 1. Plat 2. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of January 19, 1983 Charles Watkins Senior Planner tM M A'1' W f'wt.Ml / 1u11-~..^...^.,+-„-„Y•+`' YN.a1 ,.tiw .1 M M M •N.N M, ♦ Y Y, YiY Y1 M .F.✓• 1.w., ~'i i •f'14 .i~l a p 4'4taltl l t t t t t a~ p ..,~ldr • ~ lippffoal:!!lllili ! ~ ! ! p p f i : 1i p i1 i1 t1 ~ I pS! 1 ~,i, I! f r 1 i iIp S 1 r t l~/ ! !,a ! i i~ l B i p f r i f " lLr« I P ~ i f p i p f i t/ t a t s I t, i If +r~ t y 5 1 = r r r, 1 11 rv t, 1 3' 1 1 t l ~ 1 ~ I F YI " ! W glff i yi i 4 7 A 1 t I t t 1 i II t t 1~ " ~ ~1 t w a a r-"' + I! 7r► ! f rr ~ ~ ~ t t' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Y ~ 4x4 1~~~ No 1 r u x t t t' 1 t 7tA111+1^' r'tiw r ~ ~ M f X f x~ ~ p B ~ M ! p/ m ~ p t$ a i i p p i p it l 't t I f i 5 A s~r• , a ! SI f ~ { ! d p~ 7 I. ! N HI ~ ~ A i ` ~ pa ! ! ! t t ~J (A A ell 1 !!ls at All Alt!! 7tiia s! lt/A! _ ! rt ° A ~ ,T2 4 ~ ~ ~ ! a ! i ! 'A=t! iliitltp~1911 +!1(!~~' t !l!i! i ' ~ . ~ 3 ~ t fAlltt/l,tf tff f197!l1A131['lIJ~7lI!'lt t! ~ ~ ~ ~ s. t ~ , ~g ~~,,,,.,,r7 ~ ~il''tti~Iilllltt,l!►111sIaA1,`°-~:1,l,t~ll ;f¢ rn 6 s ' ~ A rr k ! alA}~,!l~Ae~l~+AIlaitntlt.Kv:;, tlilI W ' ~ r ~ ~~r Y f ~i?1119ttIAl7li AA>ti1ttlt fl tl:. lltl! •4iell t~!!~ i7 tltt It.i ttJ,lt J' 1 t I Y h I t ...•,,1.:11 t.t 11 Il5'l el,-" r:1, W p l A.•'' I ' p~ UI t # i 'I ! ~i 't t FINAL PLAT LAKEW000 ESrar: > v' 4 ~ ut , "yri ~ y^? ~ + ~ ``•{p,,~ Y P gtinQ 8J.019 Auet oN of Ire 1! T " I U k~{• + ui S1EPHEh' HEMAPIE SURVEY 46 I .lr %/S U '.1 end int ELI hCKETT SURVEY A • SCI f 1 ~1 1 t Crow Counlr, Tom u w 21 r Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission January 19, 1983 Page 5 Chair closed public hearing. Mr. Sidor commented he agrees with Mr. Jesterl that there is a neec for goad mobile 'dome parks. He thinks this is a good location. Mr. Juren moved to deny request. Motion fails due to no second. Ms. Cole moved to recommend approval. with following condi- tions recommended by staxf: 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with the City of Denton Mobile Home Park and Travel Trailer Grdi- nance. 2. A preliminary and final plat shall be submitted in accordance with City of Denton subdivision regulations, and approved prior to issuance of any !wilding permits or certificates of occupancy. 3. The approved site plan and preliminary and final plats must show a 60 foot road dedication along Mayhill. Seconded by Mr. Sidor. Vote called: Aye - Cole, Claiborne, LaPorte, Sidor Nay Juren Motion caried. :IV. Considerations A. Reconsideration of the preliminary and final plat of block 1, Lakewood Estate:. Mr. Watkins explained that at last meeting it was recom- (UNAPPROVED) mended this plat be denied based or) the fact that there was no 60 foot right-of-way. In the meantime, he has been informed that his information was incorrect, and at this time sta.f,i.' would like to recommend approval of. the preliminary and final plat of block 1, Lakewood Estates. Mr. La Forte asked how were you incorrect? Mr. Watkins replied Mr. Button bought an 83 acre tract of land and the tract existed in its current configuration. He does not plat) to sell off individual lots, therefore, no sub- division has occured. Since no subdivision has occured they were unable to apply for the kind of stands that t~■nrlir~~r Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission %Ianuary 19, 1983 Page 6 they would be applying for under a normal subdivision plat, Mr, Watkins f+arther explained he thought Mr. But- ton had refused to be annexed, Here again, his informa- tion was incorrect, Mr. Button had not refused to be r n ne.xed . Mr, Sidor asked about the extension of Loop 2887 Mr, Watkins explained there are two options. First, in the future-when it comes time to build it +:hey can acquire 60 feet from Mr. Button, or second, look at amending the thoroughfare plan to see if there is a more suitable less expensive route. Mr, Sidor moved to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat of block 1, Lakewood Estates aB presented to Commission at last meeting. Seconded by Mr, Juren and unanimously carried. (5-0) B. Consider making a recommendation on the annexation of approximately 456.acres.of land including the mcDile home park under construction on the north side of Robinson Road. (z-1560) Mr. Watkins explained request and showed a map to the Commission explaining where Mr. Button is developing his mobile home park. He said Robinson Road forms a natural boundary. Ruth Mitchell spoke in opposition of request. Her oppo- sition to this request is she does not want to have to prey city taxes, Chair closed consideration. Mr. 5idor moved to recommend to City Council the 456 acres be annexed, Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unani- mously carried. (5--0) C. Approval of the preliminary plat of lots 1 and 2, La Colina Ranch Apartments Addition. Mr. Ellison explains preliminary plat is correct and the Development Review Committee recommends approval.. Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried. (5--0) CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET Datet Vebruary 1, 1983 i Subject: Approval of the final replat of lots 2, 3 and 4, block 14, Owsley Park Addition. Summary: Tots 21 3 and 4, block 14, of the Owsley Park Addition are located along the south side of Prairie Street between Bonnie Brae and Avenue G. Tlso property is zoned multi-fawily (MP-1) and the intent of the replat is to oliminate separate lot lines and combine ?.ots 2, 3 and 4 into a single 12,500 square foot lot. Multi-family de- velopment is anticipated. The final replat conforms with technical requirements of the subdivision regula- tions. Improved s'.reets, adequate utili- ties and other public facilities are in place end available for extension to this site. Action Required: Approval of the preliminary and final replat of lots 2, 3 and 4, block 14, Owsley Park Addition. Recommendations 'Cho Planning and Zoning Commission unani- mously recommends approval. Alternativet Approve the final replat. Attachmentst 1. Reduced plat 2. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of January 191 1983. David Ellison Development Review planner R PRA/ R/ E S7'REE 1' EASY I LOT I LOT I LOT I ; LOT 4 LOT S I SYNY"$$tMq{OMMWr" IMM~II,/N v401 ow4,MYwi,ko i ' .1.UT 3Q 9LD_CK 14 i ~ M x o r ~ i o a _ wrsr I o.o' All ~~a fS1S1"YY VIC IMIS Y• YAP Minuta~ Planning and Zoning Commission January 19, 1983 Page 7 D, Approval of the pre.liminnxy and final replat of lots 2, 3 and 4, block 14, Owsl,ey Park Addition, (UNAPPROVED) Mr, Alison explained request atating the preliminary plat to Correct and they have responded to all the Development Review Committee problems. Mr. Ellison asked the Commission to do two considera- tions, one for the pre?.iminar,y replat and one for the final coplat of lots 2, 3 and 41 block 14, Owsley Park Addition, Mr, Ellison further explained this is a simple one lot resu!Aivision and is moving two existing lot lines. The zoning for this property is multi-£amilyt therefore, there is no public hearing requirement, etc. We do anticipate multi-family development. All streets are in and the Development Review Committee recommends approval. Mr. 5idor-moved to recommend approval of the preliminary replat of lots 2, 3 and 4, block 14, Owsley Park Addi- tion. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried. (5-0) Chair now asked if there is a motion on the final replat of lots 2, 3 and 4, block 14, Owsley Park Addition. Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval. Seconded by Mr. Duren and unanimously carried. (5-0) E. New Business Mr. Meyer explained to the Commission they would be re- ceiving notice in the mail regarding the City Council meeting Tuesday, January 25, 1983, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Service Center 'T'raining Room. Ila said they would also be telephoned in regard to the meeting. Mr. Ellison said there is a special called meeting next week, January 26, 1983, at 7:00 p.m. In the Civil De- fense Room af the Municipal Building. Meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m. 4 CITY COUNCIL A040 DA BACK-UP S S B T MEETING DAM February 1, 1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITBMo SUBJSCTt This is a public hearing to oonsider annex- ation of approximately 456 acres of land ' located along the east side of Teasley Lana (FM 2181) and north of Robinson Road. 'L-156Q) SUMMARY: Construction of a mobile home park has begun on a tract of land consisting of approximately eighty-three (83) acres lo- cated on the east side of Teasley Laney and north of Robinson Road, Grading, pouring of pads and laying of the internal water and sewer system has begun. Th6 annexation policy Bets out four (4) guidelines for determining when annexation should be consideredt 1. Single family developments over five lots. 2. Multi-family, industrial or commercial developments over one acre, 3. Any area where the density exceeds 500 units per square mile. 4. Any development or area that might present a significant impact upon the City in such ways as service cost, in- creased traffic, utility needs or util- ization, safety or health hazards, sub- standard construction practices, detri- mental. aesthetic quality or other simi- lar community impacts. The annexation policy also requires consid- eration of annexing logical planning areas around the area of initial concorn. City Council Agenda Sack-Up Summary Sheet February 1, 1983 Page 2 If the land lyin north of the mobile hove park was left ou of the annexation it would be surrounded by the Denton City Limits. Additicrially, some of the property to the east of the mobile home park has been discussed with the staff as the future site of a multi-;Family development and the easternmost parcel which abuts the Corinth City limit was sold for development pur- poses but was repossessed by the sellers. The Hickory Creek Sewer line is approxi- mately 95% complete at this time. Vie line runs along the east side of the mobile home park. Staff beliaves that the mobile home park under construction is in essence a multi- family development in that approximately 400 units are proposed for one 80 acre tract of land with the remaining three (3) acres to be reserved for possible retail uses. The scale of the development alone suggests a significant impact upon the city. It is felt that the 456 acre tract consti- tutes a logical planning area and the pre- sence of the sewer line insures additional future development in this area. ACTION REQUIRED: Mold a public hearing, no other action is required. ALTERNATIVESt 1. Hold a public hearing. 2. Choose not to continue the annexation process. 3. Delete territory from the proposed, annexation. Y CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MMETINGt Februar 1 1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 'ITEM' E E ACT WORDING AS ITEM I TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA) Consider adoption of a resolution acquiring 0,65 acres to replace park land lost to Windsor Drive, SUMMARYi We are purchasing this land to replace the land lost to the Windsor brive street Paving project through Evers Park. FISCAL SUMMARY: Cost to the City will be approximately $3,000.00. ACTION REQUIREDt Council should approve the resolution and contract, AL'PERNATIVESt Council could not approve the resolution and contract, STAFF RECOMMENDATTONSt Staff recommends approval. EXHIBITS: T, Letter to Steve Brinkman II. Resolution 111. Contract R QSve a Assistant City Manager rF-X AS F'Al'~KS ANC) WILL:X.IF'(:; LFe,r RTMrNI- COM,~115SION(iHS COAIMISSIOMAIj ~r y W. H MORN , JR. PERRY R. HASS Sa rna Elrlm Chnnman, Feu Worth`, Elmo JAMES A. PAXTON WM. O, RRAECKLEIN Dallas ViCb Chnlllilnn, Palostine CHARLES D. TRavls EDWIN L. COX, JR. @XE•CUTIVE DIREC'TCH WM. M. WHELESS, 111 A lheoS Hotuton 4200 Smith $chool Rontl Austin, Toxas 70744 oanuary 6, 1983 Mr, Steve Brinkman, Director Parks mid Recreation Department Miinici`pal Building Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Denton Parks Development (Evers Park) Project Number 48-00454 Dear Mr, Brinkman. Reference is made to your letter of December 13, 1982 and our letter of December 31, 1982 to the National Park Service (copy enclosed) relating to an exchange of property in Evers Park, The National Park Service has informed us that they approve the 6 F conversion, The City may proceed with the acquisition of the land to be added to Evers Park and the dedication of the road right-o' way. After the exchange of land is completed, provide us with a copy of the deed and verification that the picnic unit on the land to be dedicated for the roadway has been relocated in the park, Sincerely, "(am > Chief/Grants-i d Branch WRK:js Enclosure R R s Q T I WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas has h,retofore and authorized the extension and improvement of Windsor Drive) and WHEREAS, such Street extension and improvement requires the use of a portion of the land presently usod as Evers Park) and WHEREAS, the conversion of park land to other uses requires the replacement of such land for continuation of federal funding for park developments NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Denton hereby authorizes the purchase of land in accordance with the Contract of Sale attached hereto, described as follows) All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the B.B,D, 6 C,R.R, Co, survey, Abst, No, 186, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed to Bob E. Tripp and David E, Tripp, Truatees by deed dated December 29, 1919 and recorded in Volume 996, Page 376 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as followsi BEGINNING at the most southerly northeast corner of said Tripp tract, same being the southeast corner of Evers Park as described in deed recorded in Volume 596 page 560 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, said point also lying in the west right-of-way line of North Locust (F,M, i164)) THENCE north 88032115" west, along an existing chain link fence for approximately 350 feet and continuing for a total distance of 440 feet to a point for a cornerr THENCE north 40018137" west a distance of 234.47 feet to a point for a cotner) THENCE north 0006142" east passing at approximately 123,61 feet a corner post of a chain link fence and continuing along said bearing and fence, passing at 232.37 foot the south right-of-way line of Windsor Drive as described in deed recorded in Volume 1167 page 100 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, passing at 295.97 feat the north right-of-way line of said Windsor Drive and continuing for a total distance of 885 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the south boundary lino of a tract deeded to the Denton Independent School District by deed recorded in Volume 1140, Page 234 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas) THENCE north 89059103" east along the south boundary line of said Denton Independent School District Tract a distance of 1,91 feet to a point for a corner, said point being the southeast corner of said D,I,S,D. tract, said point also lying in the west boundary line of said Evers Park tract) PAGE ONE THENCE south 0001,30" east along the west boundary of said Evora Park a distance of 781,39 feet to the most northerly southweat corner of Evers Parki THENCE south 37<131129" east along the southwest boundary line of said Evers park a distance of 390,6 feet to the southerly southwest corner of said Evers Parki to boundary place of said`EEvers vouth a 9distance along f 3$0 feet south beginning and containing 0,65 acres of land more or lees, from the Sob E. TripP, Trust No, 2 to be used as part of Evers Park and tht, Mayor is hereby authorizod to execute said Contract of Sale and other documents necessary to such conveyance, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of January, 1983, CITY Of DENTONj TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTPE'XG ITT-,-"t'i`Ir3 !rmrM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AB. TO LEGAL FOR,Mi C, J, TAYWR, JR „ CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SYi PAGE TWO A-%hW""Nry 0980-W14400" w c«o«.rw A+Iw~,t~+.M.a ftARnN lawr.~ c. a»t,~ V ME STATE OF TLX St 1 Know All Men By Theaq Presentsf COVNW oF,,.....PW,tsia.- lUt 005 4, TRIVP and DAVID Fi, TRIPP, TRVST£E8 FOR TH£ SON TRIPP TRUST NO. 2 of else County of Denton , StW of Texas for sad is cow(dmdoe 0 the rim of Y1r .~\I------ ~M~MM w-----1..My~...---- -ww•YM•~M-.~I-------------TEN AND NO1100 ($10.00) DOLLU", and other good and valuable consideration to them IahW *d by the City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, bove Oraated, Sold ad Coawyed, and by these presents do Can 5#11 lad Convey unto the said City of Denton, Texas, A Municipal Corporation of the County of Denton , State of Texas = tpfM= All of the following described real property in Denton County, Texas, to wits All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the 8.31B, & C.R.R. Co, survey, Abst. No. 186, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed to Bob E, Tripp and David E. Tripp, Trustees by deed dated December 29, 1979 and recorded in Volume 996, Page 376 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as fcllowst sko n na at the most southerly northeast corner of said Tripp tract, same being the southeast corner of Evers Park as described in deed recorded in Volume $96 page 560 of the Deed Retards of Denton County, Texas, said point also lying In the west eight-of-way line o: North Locust (F.M. 216-1) t THENCE north 88032115" west, along an existing chain %ink fence for approximately 350 feet and continuin for a total distance of 440 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE north 40018137" west a distance of 234.47 feet to a point fo'r a corner) THENCE north 0006442" east passing at approximately 123,61 feet a corner; post of a chain link fence and continuing along said bearing and fences passing at 232.;7 feet the south right-of-way line of Windsor Drive :v3 described in .ued recorded in VoWh%o 1167 pag: 100 of the Deed Rocor&; of Denton Co'.nty, Texas, passing at 295.97 feet the north right;o4oway line of sltid wtndoor Drive and oontinuing tot a toa.aX distanow of 995 (tot to a point dot a corner, said point lying in the south boundary line of a tract deeded to the Denttrn Independent Sch ao1 Distriaa by deed recorded in volume 1140, Page 234 of the Deed Records of Denton County, TexAef THENCE north 99059103" east along tt,e south boundary line of said Denton Independent School District Tract a distar -e, of 1,91 test to a ppoint for A corner, said Foinp being the sQ utheast corner of said D11,8,D, tract, said point also lying in the west boundary line of said wets Park tract( THENCE south 0001130" toot, along the west boundary of said Evers Park a distance of 751,39 toot to the most northerly southwest corner of Evers Park( THENCE south 37031129" east along the southwest boundary line of said Evats Park a distance of 39005 feet to the souuhetly southwast corner of said Evers Parki THENCIE South 97043109" east along, the south boundary line of said Evers Park, a distance of 3S0 test to the place of beginning and containing 0,65 acres of land more or leas. / TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described pre ntw,, tosethev with 011 and singulu, the djhu t'td appurt"w s thento In aey*ise belo4ad unto the said City of Denton, Texas, its successors Wmand ass]Va forever; and it /doMert:y bled itself, its successors WiM eserutum and idmielstrato", to Warraet aed POPMr Defend all lad singular the said premises unto tie said City of Denton, Texas, its successors Wk*od assign against n,ety person whotmotwe lawfully dalmiag, or to claim the tame, or any put thereof. Mims our bind at Dentons Texas t0s day of A.D.19 83 Witnemes at Request of Granror _ _ IiOfi E. TRYP9, TRUSTEE DAVYb E, TR'(PP, PRU9TRE ~l. ~a ~ ~a'~ i I ` r l' 1~ i t 1 ~ 0 ~c, `t I t _ 1 l~ , i ~ . ~ \ r,. 4 ~ ..y.., r it All' C100i'I'y OF Dl:\'M5 - ')HIS ACRF;E!'EGT, I,y anu Yretween 1!(111 E. 9RIPP (inu DAVID L. I'LIPP, Trustees For the cot, F.- Tripp '1'r116t \o, 2. haraitlaLLLC called 'Seller, and the CITY OV I)rW)UN, 'II:\AS, a OUllIClpaI cerperatlon, hul,lnaftur Ca llvu Purcnr.cetl f ITNEM'1191, that tfw Seiler ayroos Lo sell and auuvuy, anu the purchaser agroes to purchnsc upun Lbe Lerrils anu conL,itturis horeinafter set forth, the followrcng descril.ed real prulcrLyl AlI that certain lot, tract or parcel of lan(i lying anu ucir.g siLUatea in the City anu County of Uentun, State of TvXa6, unt. heing part of tau B.U.B. 6 C,It,R. Co. nerve, AU sIt . ho, 186, av(. also being part of A tract of land as conveyed to tleu E. Ttlpp David F., Tripp, 'trustees by ueeu oatu(i Duccnd)er 2'), 1979 anu and recorded in Volume 99b, Page 37u of the Doeu Records of Damon County, 'T'exas, and more patticularly ecacriucu as InilOWUl 111,01 NIIA; at the most southerly northeauL curnet of said Tripp Lract, 8emo uoing the southea8t corner 0L Evers Park as descrihod in deed receCUeG In Volume 59b page 560 of the t)e?u Itecorcls of Dunton County, Texas, saiu point also lying In tr:e west right-of.-Iraq line of North Locust (P..1. ?164)1 11111INC'F. north 88032'15" wecL, along an ox Is tiny (rhaIn line, knee Cut' approximately 35U feet and continuing for a total Distance of 440 feet to a point fur a corhorl 99'E\CIi norLh 4001837 west a distance of 234,47 Ice t. to a point fol. a Cetnurt THr[JCV riot'Ln 000G42" uauL pa%loiny at approximately 1'1.3.61 leek. a currier post of a chain linx fence anu continuiny nl,.ny saiu boating anu [once, pai~sIt rig at 232.37 feet Lb(: south rlyht-of-way line of winurtoc Drive os uehcri6vt] in (iceu ruvur,.k..o In Volume 1167 page 1Ull of the VCeu Fecurus of Denton C%ur::y, Texall, passing at 295,97 feel the nur Lh right-oC -way l ine ut Salo W n(mor Drive ant'. cuntinuiny tur o total uistance of bES fact co a point fur a corner, saiu i,ulnt lying in Lhc south bonm.uary line of a tract doeuvu to thu DLntoll IlnOCI'CIt(:eI1L 5crlooi District by (teed reeot(ie(i in Vu1ulae 1.40, Lane Y34 ul the Ferortis of Denton County, TexorI THENCE; north 89059, 031, east alun5l the south uounoary line rf said Denton Indepenuent School District 'fract a aistancu of feet to a point for a corner, saiu point ueinc? the noutheaeL coiner of acid tract, saiu 1.nInL aLso lying in tiro Lest UuunLary line of uaiti Evers Park ttac L: )'NBt;CI! south 0u01'3U" east alor,y the west I ounuaiy ut :a(u i'Vel'n Park a 6i0tonce o1. 751.35' IeeL to tl:L aosL noILUetly seuthwcst corner of Lvers Park1 111Ef'Cf" uouth 37031' 29" e61;t aIon.,1 L1 L suuLl'.IresL ,00ncary I i:ne of r,aIo EvCf~, Park a uistance (it 3io,5 icul. Lo L!v stwtieri} e uu Ur. -oL corner 0t 81. it; l.Vtra Par(.I '01,1i,ACT 01, i,AhL-PAG;.~ (a.l. THENCE south 870431094 east along the south boundary line of said Evers Park, a distance of 35U feet to tha place of beginning and containing 0.65 acres of Land more or less. 1. In consideration of the performance of Seller as specified herein, purchaser agrees as folLowsi a. In accorriance with the condition containeo in that certain de4d from Bob E. Tripp, Trustee to Purchaser herein recorded in volume 591, Page 560 of the Deed Records of Denton County,Texas requiring Purchaser herein to provide a hard surface road across the north end of Evers Parks Purchaser hereby further agrees to completely curb, gutter, and pave Baia street within three years of the date of this agreement, b. To improve the existing drainago system north of Evers Park and west from Loouat Street (F,M. 2164) for 600 linear feet by reshaping, recutting, or excavating the present drainage system to contain tlie100 year flood as calculated by City Engineer. C. To pay for all necessary and reasonable expenses to update surveys of property affected by this Agreement, d, To pay all recording fees, forwaroing fees, title searches, and the premium charged for any policy of title insurance arising out of this transaction, 2. The Seller agrees to convoy to Purchaser marketable fee simple title to the property free and clear of all recorded anc unrecorded liens, encwr,nrancos, assessments, essemonts, leases and taxes except public easements and rights-of-way of record. 3. The Seller has executed and hanoed a grant doed, warrant- ing title t~ the Purchaser, the receipt oC which Purchaser hereby acknowledges ano accepts. 4. Seller warrants that there are no oral or written leases on a)l or any portion of the property, 5, This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between. the parties ana neither party relies upon any warrants ur representations not contained herufn, in witness whoreor, the parties have executed this Agreement this day of 1983, BOB TRIPP 6 DAVID E. TRIPP, TRUSTEES SELLERS W B _TRIP PI TR 'TEE B~• 'rRI P, S'Rl'EL'~ BOB E. TRIPP TRUST 110. 2 BOB E. TRIPP TRUST NO. 2 CONTRACT OF SALE-PAGE IWO CITY OF UENTUN, TLXAS, PURC11ASHI BYI NICRAM) U. STLWNT, MAYOR ChY CF WITON, IMAS A'I'I'L'ST h 1' , E, T . tT 6 A K CITY OF UENTON, 'ICXAS APPROVED AS ','0 LEGAL 1'01011 C. J. ':AYLUIt, Jli„ CITY A'ITUANLY CITY M DlrNVJN, 'I'CRAS 13Y I 1 O1;4EiA~'I OF BALL-PAW, TWZLI. 1 1 1 $ r3 ' 1 'A• ;,.StAilt~il+. 7aii1•tZl~~i~i[tj•yri ti~ '..i 'fii.tt. YtS{vt0"'•''o ~.3'{ /i:~ [r;~'.tir., ' ~iJ'1 •'iu'r 14~.''l "11.~i.~ l<., ~ 1, \ .\U ,.~V18 C .V ~1 ..1~ 1r. d. V ~ -1• i"~ • t~>, wy'°,~.f~ 1~ i a~ '7 i t1 '1' tt~i•F11 r•1 th -~f 1 r `'•'.r ti 1~l{~x w w t~♦'~~~'~t~~'~..'' 1~~'~.r1'•Ir~'1'►~'~~~]{a:~~''~,~'[• a~}tA' -~~.wa~t ' t h~}} i . k.11 ~lf y{a ' 3 r~11.( `"'~rCl`; 1fE 1•L41}w'.1•t ~t.,a.Ry 'T ♦ ti`•• r. w. r: _ V1 i~ey•tt. SF.f"., 1., .:''>at(' 1•t:: t~ r: '1I ,~r ,4~,.~[l t~ ~y it{~ ~tf 7 1I~~i.7'..•.. , ' L./ i~rr't If `l~f~ ji0\i'~ i~5a 7i tA~1A Ot-t? 1nri I i 1 Z t ♦ f [ ...r NN .t ~ rte ~t 1 i • t'' Y , f t r ~ v H i,;W 7ti ,f~'• ,t •F ^ 1 \ 4 Oim; E W~ gat./} ..,ti. ~ 1f, f" 'fy 1.1 Y. ![.~'_~1 C'~M 9'a 1~., 0. , _ 2091 ~ 5• ' 2 ~9~"-- S \~9of~aok f . a f 3.386 Ac, i r \ yt " (CALL WEST 350.01. s 7043'0 "E sa now MYR ' N. a8°sa' 1~'' w• 440. o ~ . a PCp N 1 S CO° 1'47"E 32b . s~-Ct ROW MKR 10 1 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M E M G R A N 0 U M T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Charlotte Allen, City Secretary DATE, lanvary 27, 1983 SUBJECT; REPORT BY BETTY MCKEAN REGARDING THE LIBRARY NAME CHANGE_ Written information and Library Board Meeting Minutes of January 27, 1983 will be forwarded to you prior to the Council Meeting under separate cover. ar o to Allen, ty Secretary CA,vvw CITY OF MINTON MEMORANDUM TO Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Charlotte Allen, City Secretary DATE; January 28, 1983 SUBJECT; Agenda Item 10 Back-Up This will be a report to the Council by Alexander Crant with the rosults of the City of Denton audit, There is no written back-up for this item. (vm, Chnriott•e Allen r. a (I CITY Or DENTON MEMORANDUM TO, Mayor and Members of the Cit Council FROM; Charlotte Allen, City Secretary DATE; January 28, 1983 SUBJECT; Back-Up Material for Agenda Item 1111 Dr, Roland Vela will make a presentation to the Council on TMPA aetivit,.es, There is no written back-up for this item, Charlotte Allen ca I~ Cityy Council Agenda BAo Up Summary Sheet February 1 r 1983 Page 3 RECOMMSNDATIONi The Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mends approval of the proposed annexation by a vote of 5-0. EXHIBITSt 1. Map 2. Service Plan 3. Property Owner List 4. Reply Forms Total 5. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of January 19r 1983 n es n Senior planner 1 ~1 I Z-1560 a`7131 . • , ' 'Mil]f.~ ~ ~ IIII ~ ~ ~1~1.]6 . ,I I i ~ I r v' PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNE ED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,. WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and « , WHEREAS, the City o'f Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service; I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic; signs, street markings, and other. traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore 1.5 established by appropriate study and traffic standards, B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- cpent of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Stater for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, 1. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within ono month after the effective date of annexation. Service Plan Annexod Areas page two F. streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (ropair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date. of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Rdoonstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as 'the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. 0. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, snnitatinn,.. tit.c_._) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. II. Plf,fining and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. 1. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the -established policies oe the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. servioe Plan Annexed Areas page three I„ iUSOeIIaneaus (2) Street approximately name signs e6 monthsdafwill be ter thtief.fective within date of annexation, II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CXP of the City consists of a rive year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as;, (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of poptilation, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and profesc,ional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opp,)rtuaities. (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the ---upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the data of annexation,, In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. Proposed Annexation Schedules (Button Mobile Home Park) Z-1560 January 10, 1983 - Submit Agenda Items January 12, 1983 - Submit Agenda Back-up * January 18, 1983 Council sets date, place and time for public hearings January 19, 1983 - Deliver ad to Denton Record Chronicle January- 21, 1983 - Publish Advertisement; January 24, 19.83. - Submit Agenda Items January 26, 1983 - Submit Agenda Back-up February 1, 1983 Hold public hearing in field and in Council Chambers February 21, 1983 - Submit Agenda Items February..23.,_ 1933 - . Submit-Agenda_ Back-up March 1, 1983 - Institute annexation proceedings March 2, 1983 - Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle March 4, 1983 - Publish Ordinance March 28, 1983 Submit Agenda Items March 30, 1983 - Submit Agenda Pack-up April 5, 1983 - .Final. Action -City GOUncil Activities r• , -re s It,y ~d _ r i7 ~S T~~rton ~Pltltlt~ hY7QJAI VP/1 SAN ? e2e 1 See iddnon G 7 re~~ ? 14/e/ WAtyejor, 'the'. 7`r C 2A _ _6-i2, N~nk e~ S, 9 t I 7s, t y 4 _ s RAX .36 ~y .3 x r r Nr r~JYS x N t ,k .5 la Alriu~~~lrr4 1 rl ~r' C>'(SiLC.L~tO ~LY~L '7S 2,41 T-rAtf [A TtRGT I1S17 y L~,4 41A~Lr.iA \ YTr d cry r r _~d__ 'yr^ Ir II \ ~pOI _ 3 ;ren _ 73 Ar`~ }3- j3o~( r~ - ~t n o r" x PROPERTY OWNER REPLY F'ORW CITY COUNCIL Z-1560 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED LI~-R.~ Herkimer „None Received None Received 5902 westgrove Dalla,+, Texas 931-6142 bti~nutes Planning and zoning commission January 19, 1983 Page 6 they would be ak~plying for under a normal subdivision plat. Mr. Watkins further explained he thought Mr, But- ton had refused to be annexed. Here again, his informa- tion was incorrect. Mr. Button had not refused to be annexed.. Mr, Sidor asked about the extension of Loop 2887 Mr. Watkins explained there are two options. First, in the future when it comes time to build it they can acquire 60 feet from Mr. Button, or second, look at amending the thoroughfare plan to see if there is a more suitable less expensive route. Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat of block 11 Lakewood Estates as presented to Commission at last meeting. Seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried. (5-0) B. rConsider making a recommendation on the annexation of approximately 456 acres of land including the mobile home park under construction on the north side of Robinson Road. (Z-1560) (UNAPPROVED) Mr, Watkins explained request and showed a main to the Commission explaining where Mr. Button is developing his mobile home park, fie said Robinson Road forms a na._.ural tboundary. Ruth Mitchell spoke in opposition of request. Her oppo- sition to this request is she does not want to have to paycity taxes. Chair closed consideration. Mr. Sidor moved to recommend to City Council the 456 acres be annexed. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unani- mously carried. (5-0) C. Approval of the preliminary plat of lots 1 and 2, La Colina Ranch Apartments Addition. bir. Ellison explains preliminary ,plat is correct and the Development Review Committee recommends approval. Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried. (5-0) f 6 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RE, COMMENDATION TO 'I'FIL C1 ,'Y COUNCIL Tot Denton City Council Case No. Z-1555 Datei February 1, 1983 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants ate Belew P. O. Box 1188 Denton, Taxas 76201 Status of Applicants Prospective Developer Requested Actions Change in zoning from single family (SP'-7) to planned development (PD) for multi-family use. Purposes Development of 271 multi-family units. Location and Sizes 9.1 acres beginning at t•1ie northeast corner of. Bernard Street and Lindsey Street. Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential; SF- South - Vacant, Denton Baptist Temple, LaQuinta Motor Hotel; MF-l, C, SF'-7 East - Future service station/garage, Carpenter's Union, commercial strips PD-29, C West - Single family residential, Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home, SP-7 Land Use Plans Area is designated as moderate inten- sity. (G-1555) Page 2 SPRCIA)i INFORMATION Transportationi The Development Ouide recommends that developments of this type have major street access and not be served by local low density streets. Bernard (from Oreenlee to I-35) and Lindsey (from I-35 to Fort Worth Drive) are residential streets with fifty (50) feet of right-of-way and thirty-four (34) feet of pavement. These sections were built through the 1976--77 paving assessment program and are immediate access points for this development. Major thoroughfares are accessible 400 feet east of the site (Fort Worth Drive) and 500 feet south (I-35). Approximately 1,795 vehicle trips per day will be generated by this propo- sal. It is felt that Bernard and 1"indsey will be operating above capa- city during peak hours only, but no definitive study has been conducted. ANALYSIS The proposed 9,1 acre multi-family planned development is located in a moderate intensity area, Mixed and diversified land uses are recommended in moderate intensity areas and high density housing is considered acceptable ift used for buffering and diversity; access to major thoroughfares is provided; con- centration of units is limited (500 - 1,000 units); and, good site design standards are applied to protect adjacent single family areas (large setbacks, landscaped front yards, screening fences, etc.). The requested 271 unit apartment complex has a proposed density of approximately 33. units per acre which is comyaraLle to M1;-1 zoning (typical density 25 to 40 units per acre). Planned de- velopment (Pb) zoning is being sought and the site plan exhibits a clubhouse, a pool and tennis courts. Landscaping is shown along the perimeter of the entire 9.1 acre tract. (G~1555) Page 3 ANALYSIS CONTINUED The major negative concern with this proposed development is the prospect of introducing increased traffic onto Bernard Stroetr it is also apparent that other residential type streets will Le impacted by any traffic flowing from this development to the N.T.S.U, area, As pointed out earlier, Bernard is built as a residential street and is i-i less than adequate conditioni how- ever, it is designated as a collector street by the approved City of Denton Thoroughfare Plan. Although Bernard Street can- not be discounted, it is felt the presence of Fort Worth Drive and I-35 within 500 feet of this site helps to dilute the poss- ible problem with traffic generated by this development impact- ing surrounding residential streets, The Planning and 7,oning Commission considered this request on two occasions. Originally, a recommendation was tabled pending modifications to the PD site plan, The multi-family development would buffer commercial zoning and development to the east and south, but tl•e original plan did not satisfy the Planning and Zoning Commission's concern with transition to the single family areas to the west and north. Sonia type of medium density hous- ing and/or increased setback areas between the proposed multi- family and abutting single family areas was recommondedl screen- ing was also suggested. In order to comply with Planning at) d zoning Commission concern, the developer reduced the number of originally proposed units from 290 to 271, A six (6) foot solid wooden fence was added to the development plans between the sub- ject site and single family zoning to the north. Also, less concentrated studio apartment units were shifted to the Bernard Street perimeter. The developer of the proposed planned development (PD) for multi-family use has been cooperative and consistent in his attempt to comply with technical requirements, Development Guide policies and Planning and Zoning Commission concerns. There was opposition to this request from surrounding residents, however, petitioner has purchased property formerly belonging to the one individual whose residence was totally engulfed by the proposed development. The 12,000 square foot lot is the subject of a change in zoning petition and will be incorporated into the overall planned development (PD) if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. (z^1555) Page 4 SUMMARY The request for a multi-family planned development at this site is felt to be reasonable. The abutting commercial. (C) zoning and land uses to the east and south do not insure that single family development will never occur on this property, but it does diminish the possibility considerably. Multi-family land use is a more attractive alternative than additional commercial, retail or office uses. With exception to the transp~)r.tation concerns with Bernard and other low density streets that will be impacted, the proposal complies with applicable Development Guide policies. Although access is riot immediate, Fort Worth Drive and I-35 are expected to handle some of the traffic gener- ated by this development, Setbacks, parking, curb cutp, and other development requirements are being met and the request for PD zoning provides the City Council with more site design con- trol than unrestricted multi-family (MF-1) zoning. RRC:OMMEODATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1555 by a vote of 6-1 with the following conditions Approval of planned development (PD) zoning for apartments as specified and according to the layout of the site plan dated January 3, 1983 as drawn by Robert U. Horn & Associates with the addition of a six (6) foot wooden fence erected along the north- ern and eastern perimeters of the property prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition with condition. 2. Approve petition without condition. 3. Approve petition with additional conditions. 4. Deny petition. 5. Table for future consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1, Aerial 2. Site plan 3. Reply form totals 4. Property owner list 5. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of January 5, 19£33 l u T. a ~ 1 f,. i 71E<',1 1?. 1'r a Y ,~Y D.I r,fn. q1 {t{i,~ t ~ ji I yy4 1r1 i , 1, ~A I ~ S A 1 h i ~ d l i S,{ i 1'I, ' 1" E,. h II` ~ ~~~F t 1 1L < l t IF ,~((1 ',f, 1 (f 1, R: 1 t Y4 1 r,..l y , },r ~ ~y,~rd[l1 1q Y i r 1' ~F'. 1 1r 4f~ I r ` y~ 4 t s yi r ~ y,+y~ ~~?4 ~q r RN +l 4a ! rr~+ 1. it S J~1~F 1 11' `I{F~ry 1 1 y.! i♦?'. hVWA i Zr yr TP\t~ }I1;Et r ! lil• ' t` is t7t rl r 1 !~1 rt.li!1r ! /+i5}J~;' {((~~I~~7. il1j 1XV 1~4 f j r' j 1 1 1 r / , t'^I f~ J!7 1 1 ,qf IIWW }11 1 1,`i t , ~t~~ +.(11 r dl i51 e I it };NJ, i i ipjj "AA, . o r 7 yy~~ y~ Lf , f~.. I r r • , A , , rii ~ c r rl r}lr. r a , ^1p Y I A ~ 1 t5 i~, ~ ti~~lr ~ FS ~'1 +~tv l 't f SS! It n rl'. Iti r{, lit ~ . [s ~ h ! r ~ I , + , t. , 1 i4 . 1 rllf ~ ~ 'i 1"F l ~ ~f t . 1 5P • ~ . f~f p i 1 tl it f u U 1 - { / $ x"'7' ~f.°. l I{ i. lilS~~r F11 V 7 ~ ;4• I r ~ 4 ~~n I ~ Y iit r,~ y.. ~ r{} IE I}Vr '1 ~I~4" rl !~f !1~411~41(vJ, 1:^ -~yl R~y r ~ 1 i( I qi I [ ~r I I r f fY }j r i LlI. 1 { r l ~lTI i t,fl ' ~ r► ! fr yj! ~ F L :a l ~71~ 1 r yP \ lr: ~t 1 }1 r r f ti t. y.tlY TIN I M rfr ! ~f 1 . n ! r 1 t ,S 6A ~V ' V4y ` t9 3' t I ii2 1 r } 1 F / ~ t 'rkl 1~ ~~Fs q j ,Y nr 1 11 i r ~ !f, '~C ~1~4,., rr l' l ~ V.r f Kf~~ r ,r t~ lr ,1' It h.,rj?I t; ltl ~I r )r I F rf . t - , r ..r. f I } ~ ~ r~~fy,~ ~ fff"', r f't'~.rt r r ~ r ~ I ~1 1~/t 't~ 1 irflcr n t. ~ t~ ~ ~ t!w{ r C +S Yr F ~fJd! ti.~`S~I w{} t~~+,~I~r4, p} w r > s , 1 jir Jury !r ~ ! i h ~1:, ,n, ! ~l .~1 ~~LN rIF t 1 y~ ' ~~1y ,1{i 1t~ lljr o ;i r r A r f 1{ { ` Lr f P~5 ~p( j~ 4 A% [~~1I Alli t. i. 1 R , Q I - 'PV ,r ( i tgj r i ~Arr`f~ , OY rnF ylr ill I < 'i 7~1 r } P 'J s( ~ 4~~'yl#'rSli~~ Iln r,~t}fFl~f~t a?° itjf'fr 1`i + ~~a' } tr (1 ii rl+~' ~Ir + ~r fT P r;l ~ ~~i~lr - 1'1:, T1 ~ i r 1 / a { tA, SSS 1'~ Vr/A.t r, i t R~~.'(~ }~t t ap, ~ }fr t r A a~IS~r~ fA1F _F, ny Fif l1'1, 1~ t k s4 Dr ,`i iJ lJ /y f " `fai}qqt . l 4 ' i'!. IR tr 1 ti 1,1.,,1' 1 l `b . RI 6h ,1 I 1 ~i: , ~ ,l p R t',t~ 11':E~r ,t h,r ~~i Vi 1 ~ ~~r J. ' ~ ) ^ 7 ~t~~))li 1,~ lJl, i.{, tlr rrr J t `7+ l 'r~ Yj 1 1 3FN Y' 1 1~~ 1~yy@ ~'r 1r ~!{1 y y~ 1tir olr ,f} !,'!t7'(l lr5 .l `~i. ~11 i r' 1 J r , ar' P d1 ~!;y~~~ it ~ `r 1~6 tF F r S ~r „ r %~~r~~ y l1 , f~ i I: 11, ~ ~ e ~ , acP~ r{! r Y I t 1} 1' ~ ^r ~ :r rl '..I. 1 (P 11Y ~ 1 F~! r~iti ~FI r ~ll ! rlv i~ + ~ Srt' rrr `_,~'P ~ ! Yj F ~ r. ,Yl~ ~ r 1 ) 1: r > I. I l 1'i • t , t~ iti t ~ }i' Y~ ~ rl ~ 'rf tf j 11 i~lJl I ~ ~r' j5 Y _ Pi Ifp 1 li r a. it 4r 1. 1 r I ~ ~ 444 ' n a , } y I ~p y, f~ t 1 r;~ i,~l ~If r y r { ~'7 1 I r ! ~Irl..~ 1 r tire' ~j{ ~r } I t r { s r r ff 1 ;I y, 1, dl r 4 7 1 1 rr ~S •~}1 1 r .,e i or,.~_'{}. ikr v,• {orA w:.'f h( I F~ l '!I J 1 E'S~t /''~A ~Y f ,r {1~y' rr /v S 7: ri, New r' r ! 1 1'r r a x r( Irv 1 y 5 [w r s Vii, ?}I r 'I e't I, r r, ! ii rl ' f t ~l" ` 1 ` ; l f l1 ~1 {rV~~ Y ~SF~ -.II I r 1 by ( 1 I a. 1 4 1 ?rn 1 } r f : , r r i 7., ~ ti ~ ~ r .M1. pl ~ Y ; 11 1 If r r i 1 1r r~~ ~ _ '.;DI} a f~' ~ 1 1 t } r! Sr ~ r ~ :rr t 1 1sy r 1~.'h 1 4 r ~ { 1 1 r 4, I I ~ F' 1 m 'nY ~I y~. ~ V~ :~`,f 'd~ lr ~iJr ~k~°f y f ~rr ,,~al.+•tLFy {k~r~ h 2 t frS y..4 ~{t r Y! G r Mk t 1 ~1`~(}M1 ~ i,11 lr~pl 1 r t r 'r 4 1~1C ~1 rrr r a t (Y ~ f'r r Il 1 ~ 1, I- YrVI~q Y .1 4 1~~Y.jr.bf" 1 1\{ ~'f' ,'1 ~;I.# ) ' { ~r /1• }I r 3r;y~>+1` t9: .~J(~a 11,.~Ii /tl r. r { {1j~~~~jl lff~~x {r r r ~ i ~~~r~ '~1 t~r ,I • ~.M'1 . ' SC!!t 4 7f~7~~ 1 {V~~'./ f I, 41, ~ p &i - ; 1 r }~A , 1 1 a M ff 1 ~ Yr f S ti. 4 U t r . A r r rt,1 r r~ l 1 i i .i. ~ y ~ ~?~~~rlr7{~i''Q4Gji~~' } .x rl t r 1'~`.`i 1~ J ; j{ir Ii a 7 r`}/1 } r 'rw~V 't. Ijq~•, 11 1f 41 1 Nt t4 ' rf /~y~~A~`I 1+ r ro Elr~'r~~Y ~~*j)t SU71i4+ f rr v ..1 z~~ Y af,,1' 4 ^Id . ~ 1) ,7 r t ~1 (1~ h`1p l I l 4L t trri4 + 'r 1 I . 1 y~ ! 7~ ~ y VI J ' If ' fir: ~)'k~i. • r to>.r, rr r !I ! ~f I I11W~ r SI1, r 3+ , `u v V, ~.r t r:.f." t t 1 ly*}y;y~pf r q o f4 1 ht r'•,r t4 Y , 1 r 'i}, rl ri /,At I 1 ' f1 , y~1aW: FyNx r. ~~tr ~~i~li~l rt' rat I7 ~Y~<'' ;1 tr ~ r tltitr ~ f~r r if M ri1.3 r` t t~+r~4j~.3rf~~ rt r.lV e;A y~}I vl~k.~ 4~ ,~Kyr[}' ~ } ~;.r ~ 1 7i t~ } r tti ` 1 t 1 r ,~i ,la ,in {1. + ~~r rtl hl •1 h~ tittii~ .1 r as ij 1. . yr ~ 1' t~Jl ^ C< t f C r I r', .j l r,J Yv lye'' t`~ 11 i ~ a 3! , t rD r/t~~f~rrt1 r r ' 1 rr I~1,'j f41i11' l f ,4 S.} ~~it~ 1~ I f l{ r , Rx, ~ , rSl ~ 4 A • . V memo M r L # !#itlt~~ I m ~m u•Iwo r*lim r w , w ~ ~ N I tl n ® ~f ■ M .i~ r 0 r 1 M w 1. r w .1:. n n ■ c " n .n n ..1~ 4~n ~ r~ 1 ni w ~ ~ `•L ~ . i N w .I... . t~' ~ r i 11. I!1 I IIIIE!II!l;lll it I .m a• 11AIIII! ( i 1 I g, - m n w M► . ► Q ti~ n ~r r ~ "w" Y ► Y ► X11 ■ ~ ` 111111illI W1111 il'lilll!S w n ~ Y n r N n r r n l r A Z • ' 1 a iii . 1 t J 711 Illil,~ll l liil I IIIIII N 1171,11 ! I' !'I'' I111Il11 ilIIII!IFII " " i;li ' ~II!fll,l I r A r r ~ Y rl n ~ n r r r n • . . . I F . ri r I . ~Y r A Y Y Y, 1 n n ♦ Y f ■ • n ■ I l Al Ire,, y m 0 m Q. :D c~ m ~ ~ Q~ m l9 PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL' G^1555 INFAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDO A D D. Waller Ina Jones None.Received 606 Lindsey 909 Lindsey Denton, Tex Denton, Tex 387--9044 382-6873 James C, Gilbert Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Nome P. 0, Drawer G Denton, Tex 382-5112 w s 441,011 *94 e s 1 6 /N _ reds A r l6ee c~Ir_nr~7. ~fcn~~~ All !y1x.r~ ~G ~~C !L /9Ar N• ~/T, L1pn~en 'I6~el y T • -6"9 6 Ef,--W&& A.-, I__ , AQunr Sao lUe~r Pf", Oon~on ~6 ~D l 40 k--~~8 1yI~ Aer hard I ret U, t e rnar.~ - _ _ 6 x 16 o ?L 2a 1 .+.~.W1r~'.q.."^11'..~T •n..r~+.wY..+w n-...YN ~N~.f^.....w+'^.^^~r1+nw ....rH MY... 1M^..M~"T1r'.~wel..~~w'T1w~+T.~1.'.~nn. w.~.. e~..ws~.•M~f. w'~~~wT+~ 1 r _ 7Dd Ec1e~}~ 4r, _rh n{ ~Qpn~eh i minutes Planning and Zoning ComrAission January 51 1983 Page 5 Mr, Bscue moved to deny the request. Seconded by Mr, Sidor. Vote was call.edi Aye - Claiborne, Cole, Dscue, Juren, Sidor, Mays Nay - LaPorte Motion carried. IV. Considerations AJ 2-1555. This is the petition of Joe Belew requesting a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to planned development (PD) classification for multi-family use on a 9.1 acre parcel beginning at the northeast corner of Bernard Street and Lindsey Street. The property has approximately 620 feet of frontage along Bernard street and 600 feet of frontage along Lindsey Street and begins approximately 350 feet north of the intersection of Bernard Street and the I-35 Service Road. If approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the construc- tion of 290 apartment units. Chairman read request and asked if there is a motion to remove this request from table. Mr. Sidor moved to take request off table. Seconded by Mr. Juren and carried unanimously. (7-0) Mr. Fanning explains chat on former report there were three conditions: 1, provide additional curb cuts 2. provide six (6) foot screen (living or wooden) 3. reduce density or additional setback proposed on Bernard Street He further explained this plan does provide the addi- tional curb cuts and does reduce density. He said staff does recommend approval. Mr. Sidor asked what type units are those shown on the new chart? He said studio. Mr. Claiborne asked what type structure being proposed would front Bernard and Lindsey, one or two story? He said two story. Minutes planning and Zoning Commission January 5, 1983 Page 6 1 Thomas Shackelford spoke in favor of request, fie said lie was concerned about his neighbors, but has talked to most of them about the request and the feeling is about 50-50 each way, He explained he has given much thought about this and feels this is a good location for the apartments. He said he feels Mr, Belew would help the neighborhood and he is willing to sell his home and move. Robert Horn, architect for the request, spoke in favor of the request. He explained evert by putting duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes along Bernard Street there still was, quite a bit of green space, He also stated with the four additional studios proposed, they are pro- viding nine additional parking spaces. James Gilbert, Director of the Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home, spoke in opposition. He stated it was news to him that Mr. Shackelford had sold his home. He said it is not the apartments they are opposed tol it is the location. They have a great concern for the number of people that will locate in that area. He said his biggest concern is the children's play area (the child- ren that will be moving into these apartments). He do es not feel there will be adequate space for them to play. He said the Home at one time had a fence along the west side of Bernard Street. They have taken it down to get. away from the orphanage concept. He said he is afraid that fence will have to be put back to keep the Home's play area from becoming a public playground. Ms. Jones, who lives on corner of 1-35 and Lindsey, spoke in opposition. She explained she simply does not want to live around apartments. Ms. Cox also spoke in opposition. She said she does not want to live next to apartments either. She feels her and her daughter's welfare would be jeopardized. Chairman declared public hearing closed. Mr. Juren asked about the six (6) foot wooden fence, there is a six (6) foot fence shown on the site plan on the north side, but what about the east? M;:, fanning said there is already a fence on the east side. Ms. Mays asked if the fence went all the way down the east side? He replied yes. a i Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission January 5, 1983 Page 7 Mr. Juren asked if the site plan includes Mr. 5hackel- ford's property? Mr. Fanning said no it loee not. Chairman commented on the very accurate presentation given by Mr, Gilbert on behalf of the Cumberland Presby- terian Children's Home. Mr. Gilbert said he is still not in favor of the req%iest but he couldn't think of having any better neighbor than Mr. Belew. Ms. Mays commented that she shares Mr. Gilbert's concern, Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of change in zon- ing from single family (SF-7) to planned development (PD) classification for multi-family use on a 9.1 acre parcel beginning at the northe~ist corner of Bernard Street and Lindsey Street with the following conditions Approval of planned development (PD) zoning for apart- ments as specified and according to the layout of the site plan dated January 3, 1983 as drawn by Robert E. Horn & Associates with the addition of a six (6) foot wooden fence erected along the northern and eastern perimeters of the property prior to issuance of a cer- tificate of occupancy. Seconded by Mr. Juren. Vote was calleds Aye - Cole, Escue, Juren, LaForte, Sidor, Mays May - Claiborne Motion carried L~. B. Approval of the fint.l replat of lots 7-R ar)d 8-R, block B, Stratford Addition, Section Ones. Mr. Fanning explained request stating lots 7 and 8, block B, in the Stratford Addition are zoned multi- family (MV-1), but single family dwellings have been constructed on each lot, All utilities, stroets and other public facilities are in place, He said staff does recommend approval. Ms. Mays moved to recommend approval of the final replat of Lots 7-R and 8-R, Block B, Stratford Addition, Section One. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and carried unani- mously. (7-0) jj~,u°'SM`~' r .e.: . 'e••,,:, . ,.1.7„M,u^-r.^.,.w m ..nMM....~ww~., N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON' TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF.THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO# 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 8,956 ACRES OF LAND ,OUT OF - THE"_ALEXANDERHILL- SURVEY"" ABSTRACT N0, 6231• DENTON :.COUNTY, TEXASE•AND "MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINJ AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. k4 may~}_'• ~ {~,.H~ ry'.~,... n. ,...bi ~ i, . 1..41::. r. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSt SECTION I. The Zoning Classification and use designation of the following described property, to-wits ..All that Certain 9,101 acre tract, or parcel of land situated in the Al•0x&nder..H ML-Survey, Abstract No. 621" city and County of Denton, Texas,"`said tract being the remainder of tract called 11 3/4 acres in deed from T, P, Surge to H, F, Hancock as reoorda& in Volume 1700 Page 351 of the Deed Records of Denton County,.Texasj, said traot being further described herein by mates and bounds-ax•followat. -BEGINNING for the-'northwest corner of this, at the northwest corner of said 11 •3/4 acre Hancock Tract on the west line of thti sforemenitlone3 "•Hr2T--Survey, a steel rod set in Bernard THENCE south 89039' east at 19.9 feet a oroastie corner post, - --overall 600,0 feet with fence to steel rod set at the northeast oorner•of said Hancock Tracts `THENCE south-696,,65-1eet. with the general course of old fence =1dne to-a--etee`1 -rod•--set-=~30=feet northerly of the occupied canter--line of Lindsey Streets THENCE south 87035' west 600,52 feet with the north line of Lindsey Street to its intersection with the west line of the aforementioned 11 3/4.aore Hancock Tracts THENCE north 408,7 feet with the west line of said Hancock Tract to the-point of intersection with the south line of tract described in deed from H. F. Haneook, et ux to Herbert Hancock, Jr, at ux as recorded in Volume 352, Page 446 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas THENCE north 88419' east at 12 feet the start of retaining wall and fence, overall 162.18 feet to three inch pipe post for the southeast corner of said Herbert Hancook, Jr. Traott THENCE north 0447' west at 74,25 feet fenue corner, overall, 75.0 feet-to the northeast corner of said Herbert Hancock, 'Jr. Traotj THENCE south 88019' west 161,15 feet parallel to fence on south side of said Herbert Hancock Tract to the west line of aforementioned 11 3/4 acre tracts THENCE north 211.7 feet (call 210.0 faet) to the place of beginning, there being 0.145 acres in Bernard Street as It. is presently occupied leaving a net acreage of B.956 acres of .land. Z-1555/JOE 8ELEW/PACE ONE , 1114011111111111g, ~y,~ir7..- - .::.'~;I.;r1'.1':lMh4~:r .r.. 't1; .tn.?,r~y ••r'!_, ` kfi:iC~+S~':'...r!I '~I~~.! e is hereby changed from Sin le Family "S6'-7" District Claasifi- cation Use to Planned Development "PD" District Claaeikication and Use under the Comprehensive Zoningg Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditloni 1, Apartments As specified and according to the layout of the site plan.dated January 3, 1983 as drawn by Robert E. Horn'& Associates with the addition of a six' (61 ) foot-wooden - fence erected along the nort4i rn,,,and•' AssterqE+erimeters of. ..the ..property. _ To prior to issuance. of.-a certificate of occupancy,, The Wing Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of. January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code:of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under ordinance No,~69-11 be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District classification and use. SECTION II, -That`the'.City council of the city of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that suoh change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the diatrict and for its peculiar suitability- or part.ioular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens, That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings-having heretofore been held by the Planning and zoning Commission-and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving_due_notice__thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of February, 1983. RICHARD , ST WA , ATTESTi K `m'Te'""nZZ'rET, rTY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS , RYS L - Z-1555/JOE BELEW/PAGE TWO 3.24E ~j ~1~~111M~~LiYi1~t11ifM -Y- . •••Y ~ `•~-a w r / I WAN v •I • iii ~ ~~~~'i3~ m m How" !1.611 41 1 t7 k 1 1,•.1 n ii ~ i f , 1 Y Y QI IL l 3 y 3 ° r i r' Y I • ; I,lill II II !.I II IIII Illlt "A ~ ,.m ~~5~.` A. n •lt I I i1 1.1 1 1111 1 i , I I I I III 11 III•tI11~11111111I~,iIli11111Illl ,,1i1 ICI . • n ► ► n • r n > ° n I r r A A n .t ► 'A M Y A I • / A A ` .I r A > > I A Y~ '1 Y Url, • i IIII IIiIIIilil,lllLi Iiiiliili Illi~lillill 1 -t3~ 1 !ii lilli;• I111`iIIIIII~iI~I!!!I:"I;I;;;,I11/!1~j,lllil,i ► > > r L t if r A r r r. A n~r 1► r r n s y~+~f ,r ~ , 666 ,/l!1 (D m ® 0 (D m 0 © 0 ® m 0 0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Tot Denton City Council Case No. 5-164 Dates February 1, 1983 GENERAL INFORMATION ApplicantsW. V. Tunnicliff First State Hank Building Denton, Texas 76201 Status of Applicants . . . 1 . 1 . . . . . . . Requested Actions Specific Use Permit for mobile home park development in a light industrial (LI) zoning district. Purposes Expansion of existing Center Point Mobile Home Park to accommodate twenty (20) additional lots or stands, Location and Sizes Approximately+4.5 acres beginning along the west side of Highway 377 (Fort Worth Drive) approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of James Street and Highway 377 (Fort Worth Drive). Existing Land Uses Vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - Vacant building, vacant, mobile homes, storage; LI South - Hurricane Fence Company, mobile home park; LI Last - AAA Auto Parts and Wrecking Yard, warehouse and storage buildings, single family ! residential; LI i West - Denton Marble and Tile, A-1 Transmissions, North Texas Auto and Welding, single ! family residential; LI Land Use Intensity Plan: Area is designated as moderate inten- sity s (S-164) Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Public Utilities: Adequate water, sewer and electrical, service is available for extoosion to this site. Transportations Site has immediate access to Fort Worth Drive. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Mobile home parks must be developed in accordance with the City of Denton Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Park Ordinance. Some applicable requirements and definitions are as follows: Section 23-10 - Definitions: Mobile Homes A movable or portable dwelling constructed on a chassis and which has been designed so that it may be occupied and used without a perma- nent foundation, further, a single family dwelling unit suitable for year round occu- pancy and which has provision for compliance with the applicable code requirements for dwellings. Such vehicle shall be eligible for registration and licensing by the State of Texas for being transported on the public streets and highways. Mobile Home Parks A unified development of mobile home spaces, or stands, arranged on a tract of land under private ownership. Mobile Home Subdivisions A unified development of mobile home sites or lots which have been divided for the purpose of individual ownership, and which is gov- erned by the provisions of the subdivision regulations of the City of Denton. Mobile Home Lots A parcel or tract of land £or the placement of a single mobile home and the exclusive use of its occupants, and which is located in a mobile home subdivision approved by the Plan- ning and Zoning commission of the City. Stand: An area within the park which has been im- proved for a single mobile home or travel trailer. (8-164) Page 3 1:,PPLICARLE REGULATIONS CONTINUED Section 23-61 - Requirementst Any development, redevelopment, alteration or expansion of a mobile home park within the city limits of Denton shall be cone in compliance with the following roquir©mentst Locationi A mobile home or travel trailer park shall be located only in designated zoning areas and with a specific use permit fog- that purpose, as provided and defined in the zoning ordi- nance. Area Requirementst 't'here is no minimum area which may be devel- oped or used for mobile )tome park purposes. Stand Requirementst Each stand shall provide a minimum area of 3,500 square feet; however, no such stand shall average less than forty (40) foot in width, nor less than eighty (80) feet it, depth, except where otherwise expressly approved by the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion and the City Council. Screening: There si,all be constructed and mai.ntaitied, a permanent screening novice not less than fivo (5) feet in height on all sides of the park except where na0iral barriers exist to form all or part of such a screen, or where road- ways exist to create a traffic hazard. Open Space Requirementst a. A minimal fifteen (15) feet from the nep~est corner of the mobile jtome or travel trailer to the froi, line of the stand. b. No mobile home or travel trailer shall be closer than fif- teen (15) feet to any adjoining public street, nor closer than ten (10) feet to any stand line except where expressly approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City C,)unci1. C. The minimum distance between mobile )-tomes and travel trail- ers shall be twenty (20) feet on the sides and sixteen (16) feet on the front and rear. Page 9 APPLICABLE; RNGULATIOVS CONTINUED Drainage: The ground surface in all parts of a park shall be graded and equipped to drain all surface water in a safe, efficient manner. The adequacy of drainage facilities shall be verified by a licensed professional engineer. marking: Every mobile home stand shall have two (2) off-street parking spaces, Travel trailer stands shall have one (1). Internal streets or common access routes An internal street or common access route shall be provided to each stand. The street. shall be a minimum of thirty (30) feet in width, except where otherwise approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, The internal street shall be con- tinuous and connect with outer streets in the park or with public streets or shall be pro- vided with a cul-de-sac having a minimum radius of sixty (60) feet. No internal street ending in a cul-de-sac shall exceed four-hundred (400) feet in length. All streets shall be constructed to meet the minimum specifications for streets wi~.hin the City of Denton, except the curbing, . con- crete lay down curb oi. acceptable subi,citute shall be used as approved by the building official., Recreation Areas All par4:9 shall have at least one recreation area, located as to be free of traffic: haz- ards, easily accessible to all park residents and centrally located where topography per- mits. ANALYSIS The existing Center Point Mobile Home Park is reportedly the first, and only, Denton mobile home park development that was built in compliance with the Mobile Home Park and Travel Trailer Ordinance. The Mobile liome Park and Travel 'f'railer Ordinance was approved on June 6, 1970. Mobile homes and mobile home park (s-164) Page ANALYSIS CON'T'INUED developments have changed in structure and in image in recent. years, and staff responds to daily inquiries from individuals and developers that are interested In locating mobile home(s) in the City of Denton and its extra-territorial jurisdiction areaB (ETJ - 2 miles outside City limits). There is no escaping the fact that mobile, modular or manufac-, Lured housing has become an alternative for many home buyers who cannot afford conventional residences, and this increasing trend has been embraced by courts, legislators and decision makers at several levels of government, The "transient" image of mobile homes and mobile home owners still (sxists in many communities, and there are legitimate concerns about fire safety, wind safe- ty, inspection procedures and other structural factorsi however, some traditional fears and objections have been relieved in re- cent years. There is %n abundance of information, .literature, studies and statistics which support pronouncements that mobile homes ultimately serve as permanent residences a ~,a.st majority of the time, and in some instances, the quality of the mobile homes is such that they are not distinguishable from traditional housing. There is little doubt that the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council will soon witness a substantial increase in the number of zoning and subdivision petitions in- volving mobile homes. The proposal for the expansion of the existing Center Point Mobile Home Park is considered reasonable inasmuch as there are several industrial, commercial and non-conforming mobile home uses presently surrounding this site. Twenty (20) additional or s tands will be established if t•he petition is approved. Ln - _.T_____ - RECOMMENDA'T ION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of S-164 with the following conditions by a vote of 7-01 1. Plans for development and the development itself shall conform with the Mobile Home Park and Travel Trailer Ordinance and subdivision regulations of the City of Denton prior to issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy. 2. Development shall conform to approved site plan or plot plan. 3. A six (6) foot solid wooden fence shall be erected on all property lines that abut ]and uses that are not mobile homes or travel trailer parks. 4, A ten (10) foot rearyard and sideyard setback shall be observed. a(s--16A? Page 6 ALTRRNATIVGS 1. Approve petition with conditions. 2. Approve petition without conditions, 3, Approve petition with additional conditions, 9. Deny petition. 5, Table for future consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2, Site plan 3. Property Owners List 4. Reply Forms Total 5. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes • r 1~ y : ` 1 , 1 , 1 { I, ,T r YC, , ~1 i~ 1 9+(,~,, ~,a,.,)F1~! F I~•~,~r t { fry h ~L~ IC~I,S +~,17: ~y"i v i / f~i ~itvI rJ• 5, ~I 1 r f~~~~1~^_, ,i ;Y ry , k'~i. ~ i •1 r i llr 1'~r ~ ~ ~~~r~ yt~ ~ ~~a4~~~f ~1 1'3 1 ~.V y4 hl F~ ~ ',Y~ rt. ~ 5 1 v~ ~b~~>f ~f 1 t' S. Jj tr ~ 1~;, '7 1• ~ r, t''~'1 ~ ~ ~>S~f'•'~ r, 5 Ion ~ ~Y ~4• ! Y 1 lIi ) li Tyr ~ ~ ELI ~ 4 1` 4 Z Pr 11 yr{r U( w, v ` lY ' .v{i~ i~( ~1y. b d 1x Y•. q/y~ 1~~ 1~ ~~ly ``r tt yn^' ' ' V nq 'FT~N ' 11L. ~4 .l .;TAY y~o v , + n Y j-YYY^^^ 1 I~ •r q j~ 5 7 i t ..r 1 1 r K, 4 r Y 45n 5~ ~ I { y > > ~ r h L ~~4tY 'y'. ` Irlr~y"''}K4 '.r 11 rr •r ~t 1 ( 5 + II,I f I 1 k. 4 , 1 id ) ~ F r 5 r 1 JI ' ' J' JI j 4 r i r J ~ I 1~ i r 5 f 4 Z .I 'S ~ ~r ' ~S' 1' I rt I4 'ICI ♦ ~ ~ V ~,e~d ~r!~ ,F~'~1 ~ k,~ ~ r ~ K; r r 1 .}lF 7 Iii F; r 1''.C F fV 'i' A , ?t n, L ~ ".;iM1 4,! r¢r'. ill' 1'i 'j '+''ij',{'Kf ✓t F~ ~ i h 711 ' I0 d Y; ~ I ql ~r6,'Y~i y"~ S i' I I. P 4~ Y~r( , ~ !'ti' trlli l~l 1 { 1 f 1r rp ,r 1 ~ r1 1 A 1' i. 'y 11 I tIv r5 q, r(t I I , 5~~, :1' t~ ~'Fr f t,! t ~ ! ~A b 1 , ~ 1 ~ f AP Sri y 55 ~+t y 4~ Y 7Tr ti I r 15c S {1 1 r r u) 5 I r.~1, f I' 4 5 v~ I~. 1. .I ' AI ~ ~ y J~"`~~~ ' n.: 1. i ~ it yy`. 4~ ;+1 ~ r,: 5 t.n t; p~54P~1 t in i i~Y •r h ~rA j-t' 1?l 1 r4 ` { t y~L r`v r I y , ~wr' ~ , 41 1 r.. 'r 5 < ~~1 r'. 1 I ~a F1~: ~ r~ + ' I ,.a { r Y'~ 1+ u r r 3" A'' F ,r 1 ~ 4r~~' r1 ~Iyrv ~ ~et1 611 n ~~P9~ ~ ~i If w w?. r , Irk~ ~,n} q S~,N t 111 , , 5 1 I ~ t a: V"" 5 }1y ~ I I ~.t~~.y,,~.5r ,L~d~1.5a~.~~~e'.. / ~ ,1r n (y~.~e'~✓5;~ .'l.. Jr ~ I j , :1~.; .i j•l?t LSV rl 5 A~ ,.~51 ' Ji5'~~~lT;°v. ,1 ',l 1 8 I : f. SQ ,i •y t' I c 'fir y l 1 'rl1 ~5: rl},~I' !J r •J 4{ .:.F F.`~ t, C 1 rpp /+I 44 K t. Is , 1 1i t Garter Rd ^ 40A IG'den vh?f~/gfowl I ~ '~L--• rVdlti' (i r~YJ/Q/ FdAl~d~ I { ~~~ra' neawnu rsor tiL Nid W/ 5'ik n IAII I 41 ;tip ssw• rr+va1 6q 1Vti. /0' Ouen i TYp/CAG cor LAYOUT 11 _ 1e' ae'l u//G rsmA \ I v ~ evrr \r L\ 4-11 ' ~ ~J ny I,~+ * •S N1fN gMCCY EERS CG'N7"6F~ Pa/N7' M/~~it•~' yoM~~a,~~ f~RE'L/M/A/AF?Y f~GA7' 2 I py~54c Q 5HlJ~VIA14 Sri OS 4 40"$ ~c~ we ~ Ob5 I , , CIrY o-it 476MrOnJ rxxA5 - .s PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL S-164 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received None Received s IA 4 Ida C:l .Qtd~~ '~6 2,11 tt see adhoou ut _.r J - n t _C S-1 ~s^ IA Z.2 Pj, 1JeHA 4r.. Il en'fen 7L .20 ! - LIA&& _21,1 S 6. 4ef4eh Lin. reien 9Gi2of 4 20101 Wer~~_~e._. ~ ~'~~'-~J C/r! •-.~t~~R~ Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission December 1, 1982 Page 4 Mr. Barton asked how manyy units on tract of land? Chairman said six (6). Mr. Barton then asked if stu- dents will be ranting? Mr. Peckham said his aim is to cater to the students. Chairman declared public hearing 6 osed. Andy Si,dor asked the size of the units? Mr. Peckham answered one is 900 square feet, two is 500 square feet. There are two 2-bedroom, one 1-bedroom and 1 efficiency. Mr. Sidor stated that Ms, Faller was not aware of tho six (6) foot fence to be erected around the playground area; he feels this should be put in as a condition. Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of Z-1551 with conditions and condition #4 revised to read as follows: 4. A six (6) foot solid wooden fence shall be erected along any and all property lines abutting single fam-l-ly pr.o.peLr.ty. Seconded by Ms. Mays, ~1. Vote: Aye - Claiborne, Cole, Juren, Mays and Sidor Nay - Escue and LaForte Motion carried. (5-2) B. rS-164. This is the petition of W. V. Tunnicliff requesting a specific use permit to allow for the expansion of the Center Point Mobile Home Park on property located adjacent and north of the existing mobile home park and containing approximately 4.5 acres of land. The Center Point Mobile Home Park is located along the west, side of Fort Worth Drive (U. S. Highway 377), beginning approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of James Street and Fort Worth Drive. Mr. Ellison stated we mailed out g notices; we received one reply f orn, in favor and one reply form in opposition. Simon Lewis, living behind property, spoke in opposition of proposal. He is concerned about the value of his property and what kind of people will be attracted to this trailer park; if the,; will rent trailers or own their own trailers. Also how will the City compensate for protection, is there going to be a fence? Chairman said the valp.d of his property would not be hurt by this development, He also said there will be a five (5) foot fence erected along the property line. The people will own their own trailers. Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission December 1, 1982 Page 5 H. W. Lantrip owns three (3) acres of,land north of the service station, He is concerned about what kind of fence will be put up? Chairman answered five (6) feet. 6111 Claiborne asked what the prop-arty;is used for? Mr, Lantrip answered the property hhas one (1) building on it which is used for a church; it is on the northeast cor- ner of-the property. Mr. Ellison stated staff feels this is reasonable re- quest inasmuch as there are non-conforming mobile home uses presently surrounding this site. Staff recommends approval of S-164 with the following conditions: 1. The property shall be developed in accordance with the Mobile Home Park and Travel Trailer Ordinance and subdivision regulations of the City of Denton. 2. Development shall conform to approved site plan or -plot plan. The regulations do require an official plot plan or site plan. We have informed Mr. Fields that the one we work with today needs some modification and be more specific. Mr. Sidor asked what a stand line is? Charles llatkins answered stand is like a lot. Chairman declared public hearing closed. Mr. Juren made motion to recommend approval of S-164 to include the conditions suggested by the staff and the following conditions as well: 1. A six (6) foot solid wooden fence be erected on all property lines that abut land uses that are not mobile home or travel trailer park. 2. Shall have a ten (10) "not rearyard and sideyard % setback. 3. A site plan in accordance with the Mobile Home and Travel Trailer Ordinance shall be submitted to the Planning and Community Development Department prior to City Council action. LSeconded by Ruby Cole and carried unanimously. (7-0) Y ,2, 01• /1 NO, AN ORDINANCE ORANTINO A SPECIFIC" USE PERMIT AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, A$ SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASr BY ORDINANCE NO, 69.11 ANU AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 4,5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXASr AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSt SEC ION I. The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the following described property, to-wit, All that certain 3,17$ acre tract of land, or parcel of land istuated in the Wm. Daniels Survey, Abstract No, 370, City and County of Denton, Texusr said tract being part of lands shown by deeds from Gibson to Welch as recorded In Volume 333, Page 397 and Volume 362, Page 169 of the need Records of Denton County, Texasr said tract being further described herein by metes and bounds as follows% BEGINNING for the southeast corner of tract being described heroin, at a right of way-marker found at the northeast corner of tract described in deed to Rene Cassar as recorded in Volume 101, page 756 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas (looally known as part of Center Point Mobile Home Park(r THENCE wee'. 629.45 feet generally along fence to an iron pin found at, angle point in fence liner THENCE' north 89043'09" west 198.58 feet to the southwest corner of aforementioned tract as shown by deed recorded in Volume 362, Page 169 of said Deed Recorda) TH,. '9~ north 1057124" west 25,0 feet to the most western north,..3t corner of said tract) THENCE south 89032126" east 198,59 feet to iron pin found at fence cornerr THENCE north 1059129" west 224.36 feet to an iron pin found at fence corner THENCE south 89053143" east 459,0 feet to a point in north line of aforementioned Cassard tracts THENCE 4°24146" oast 248.2 fact parallel to the western line of U,S Highway No, 377 to a point) THENCE south 89053143" east 160.0 foot to a point in the western line of said U.3, Highway No. 3771 THENCE south 4024146" east 114.2 feet to the place of beginning, which is classified as Light. Industrial "LI" District Classift- Cation Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby changed and a Specific Uoo Permit is S-164-14. Y. TUNNICLIFF-PAGE 1 r - hereby granted for the use of al..Nid property for an extension of a mobile home park known as Center Point Mobile Home Park to accommodate twenty (20) additional lots or stands, subject to the following conditions and restrictions to-wits 1. Plans for development and the development itself shall conform with the Mobile Home Park and Travel Trailer ordinance and subdivision regulations of the City of Denton prior to the issuance of building permits and certificates of ooeupanoyl 2. Develogment shall conform.to approved site plan or plot: plan) 3. A six foot (61) solid wooden fence shall be erected on all property lines that ab%t land uses that are not mobile home or travel trailer parkas 4. A ten foot (l0') rear yard and side yard setback shall be observed. in addition to all uses authorized in a Light industrial 61,I' District. The development of the property shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 190 , as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, 'I'oxas under ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same Is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION N. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Te};as, and vith reasonable consideration, among other thl.nga for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the ' maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. f 3-164-w. Y. TUNNICLIPP-PAGE 2 ql„N ~ SECTION III. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval the required public hearings having heretofore boon held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of February, 1983. i I HA O 0. MWA T p AAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APpROVEU AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLO._, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTC1, TEXAS BY I S-164-W. Y. TUNNICLIFF-PAGE 3 1 / k'rfnr Parkrhy- /974' ~ , r II Par CPA ] I t ' ,f! ` I Now G'~x+/a' f`?ras>~ ',SSIWIi C L l Yoe _ Mi/7 COf Sited 1 / I a 10, avww (7I]. rrre 1 Iv' Onsn rrPicAC z or 4mu r ~ ~rlaae. r~~ w pR~L/ly//UAF2Y F~LA7' ~~~rr E is as C~'lu rc f? f~OIAJ r Mv~3rL ~ HOT' ,~ys~~E' ,!,z' SHoW/NG Sih~.~Grs Fors ,a, ~r~,os CITY 0,0 y t ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: February 1; 1983 SUBJECT; Approval of the site Ian of lots 1 and 2, block 1, North .'exas industrial Park - Phase I, SUMMARY, This property is located within planned development (PD-17), PD-17 was approved for light industrial (LI) land uses, One condition of t:hey PD ordinanri, is ghat provaJ; '>e ,ranter: specific site plan ap by the planning and Loning Jomm ssion and City Council, The petitioner is requesting site plan approval and will subsequently request final plat approval„ ACTION REQUIRED; Approval of the site plan, RECOMMENDATION. The setbacks, buildings, laud use and parking all comply with general require- ments of the PD ordinance and zoning requirements. The site plan meets all technical requirements and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval by a vote of 7-0, ALTERNATIVE: Approve the site plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1, Reduced site Elan 2, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of January 26, 1983 David Ellison Development Review Plannwc- room ~ r M - Y~ \ 1 ~t 4• ' •w NLr / / J r tit r' \ ~ I ' efxfw ;«.~1i1i« ; 1 ~ 'yy K~ •r J'I ~ u Mrt ` .fj~. R1.1lfYit t/6 'lIM(I r'.•/ / / ~ / 7FPANK C;!Ll N 0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAN OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDUANCE1S OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY (=INANCE NOS 69w1, AND AS SAID MA.: APPI41ES .TO CITY. LOT NOS.. 6, 7 ?4 C.ITX BLOCK NO, 276•-R AND 011a LOT NO. 1, CITY BLOCK N0, 276-A, AS SHOWN TRUi DME ON THE OPFICIAL TAX MA-P--OF THE .PITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE :ARTXCUL,ARLY DES- CRIBED..1 THEREIN; ANA DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE =:E, ,yj ,'i p7~i1 ~I,1 r . •..N .ir~.:\ 1..:1 frl.: is . 1 4..,:f~w,.. , i~r .7: . , l „ THUS .COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF,DENTON,' TEXAS) HEREBY ORDAINS: i ♦w.,~;'~M... _ ..f.... J,~. .vL :':wr 4 _ . w-• rrr` ti ,r. :I .~,i °S r«..~•.. a •,r?. SE.GT-IOU _L♦ That the zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted January 14, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Okdinanoes of the City of Denton, Texas, nrider pro0.alons of Ordinanoe No. 69-»13, be, and the same is hereby imended as follows: All. the hereinafter desori). ed property Ia hereby removed from the "A" Agricultural District as shown on said Zon. ing-Map, and--a-1 provisions of Ordinanoe No. 69-1, adopted the 14th d4y:of.J'anuary, 1969.,, as amended, shall hereafter 'apply ;to.said property as "PD'' Planned Development District i in.rthe same',mannex as other property located in the 11PD11 • :Planned Development Distriar,, All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being,-situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas,.,and' being Cj.ty Lot Nos, 6, 7 & 8,City BlKok No. City..Blook No. 276-D arid being `y ...further des_eribed._.as being located or, the east side of =the intersection of Woodrow and Morse Streets and to the North side of the City Power Plant, This property kiso exiats along; -both sides of Pecan Creek. SECTION IT. That--the--- City Counoi l-=of the- City of Denton, Texas hereby finds-that such change i, in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the' purpose o.f promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton,'°'Texas ,-and with reasonable oonsideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses; and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appro- nirate uoes of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas; and its citizens, d SECTION- Ill. That-this -ordinance shall be in full force and effect immedl - ately after its passak;e and approval, the required public hearings having he'r'etofore been held by the planning and Zoning Commission 'a and the, City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 30th day of October, A. D: 1973. 3t r1 cf , r1 Oft ~*ATTEST: CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS f Uctaba;r lti, ,laJ"15 Cant.liuwd / (11) A public hearing m:s hold oil 'd-1215, the ppotit.lon of Mr. Ben Purls, rogLlost.111A that the zoning classlUcatioit W the U-1.100 block of lt'oodrow Lano bu changed from tho Agricultural (A) to tho Plaiutod Development (ill)) c:lassi'ftcatl.on, Vats pra~orty is further doscribod vs' boi.ng located on . thu oast side of tha in orsoct on of Woo-?row and Morso Stroe.w and to the nor`,, g1do of tho City power plant, ,This property also exists along both silos of Pectin Crook. The Cite tax records doslgnato this property as City Block No, 2'16.13, Lot Nos, 6., 7' mid B turd City Block No, 276.1), Lot No. I.. After hoarfng 1 proponont and none ia1 opposition,' and a roport of approval from the Planning $ Zoning Co;nuni.ssion, motion was mado b foster, seconded by Schnoider that the petition be approved, subject to t e following conditions - (1) 7'11at all utility easements to, be abandoned by the City and all utility easements to be duclicatod by the property oafner be clearly specified prior to approval of the filial site plan. (2) '11int the pproposed extension of Morse Street t=hroUgh the dev- elopMent be provided with a mi-Mintnn 70 foot right-of-way across the property with the exact location to be specified , and determined before' approval of the final site plan. (:S) That a dedication- along 'the west property line of the entire tract be made so that Woodrow Lane will 1:zve a 70 foot right- of-way. This plan represents dedicating a minimum of 35 foot but that said dedication shall affect only the western most 35 foot of the Lori parks tract, % (4) That the property to the south of the proposed drainage t easement and greenbelt as shown on the map prosonted be designated as "Area 111, and that the property to the north of the proposed drai.nago easement and greenbelt as shown on the map be designaa.tod as "Area 2", (5) That with. regtard to tho development of that portion of the tract in "Area 211, that no single site p'<n be presented until approval of the site plan for the (love, lopntent.of:the entire 'Area 2" tract. ."I . r;,. 4. M . (6) "That the clevelopor make rcasonFab.to efforts to preserve and improve natural resources (i,e, trees, grassos and shraabs) in a warmer that will bo consistent to the preservation of the environment, (7) That the final plans for the development shall include a consideration of: drainage and engineering design for drainage control on the entire tract, -This condition shall include showing the location of potential %a ter, sewer, drainage structures and-related facilities. (b) That in tho preparation of final site ;Mans for approval, that all such plans shall confonn to the subdivision rules and regulations, that the engineering designs shall be approved by a ref;:istered professional engineer and that copies of all design calculations shall be submitted Upon request of the staff members -of the (.'it), of Denton. Motion carried. (C) A public: hear:ini; was hol(i on St-69, the ),.equcst of his. Sarah U, Stone, requesting tha.(: she be grant:oc! a specific use p,mi .t for tho operation of Minutes Planning and honing Commission January 2b, 1983 Page 2 A, Approval of the site plan of North Texas Industrial Park, Phase 1, (UNAPPROVED) Mr, Ellison explained this is request for site plan approval as a part of PO-17 %ghich is located along the east side of Woodrow Lane, he said that proposed land use of a storage and/or warehouse facility complies with PD light industrial land use. He said that site plan has been reviewed for compliance with PD ordinance, ana staff and Development Review Committee recommends ap- proval. He said that probably PD status should be re- moved and straight light industrial zoning given to the property as, it is an old PD and some of conditions may no longer be pertinent, Mr. Sidor referred to future need of improvement to Woodrow Lane and Mr. Ellison said that developer is not platting portion of property which would require im- provement of Woodrow Lane, that not platting that por- tion is apparently legal, Mr. Edward stated that, only a small portion of PO is being developed at this time, that improvements cap be required when other phases are developed. Mr. Escue moved to recommend approval of site plan of lots 1 and 2, block 1, North 'texas Industrial Park - Phase I, Seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried. (7-0) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE; Fobruary 1, 1983 SUBJECT; Approval of the final plat of lots 1 and 2, block 1, North Texas Industrial Park - Phase 1. SUMMARY; This is the final plat of property located within PD-17 along the east side of Woodrow Lane. PD-17 is designated for light industrial (L1) use,. and the proposed buildings and land uses will comply with zoning ordinance require- ments, The intent of the final plat is to establish two lots which will begin appproximately 190 feet east of Woodrow Lane., gy offsetting the lots and not platting property immediately adjacent to Woodrow Lane, the developer is avoiding the perimeter street paving policy portion of the subdivision regulations; there- fore, no improvements will be made to Woodrow Lane, Public access will be provided from Shady Oaks Drive, Shady Oaks is a collector type street with 60 feet of right-o£-way and 44 feet of pavement, A 30 foot dirt road abuts the southern perimeter of lots 1 and 2 but it is a county road that does not have to be improved as a part of this subdivision, A 30 foot building line is provided off the dirt road and a 25 foot building line is provided off Shady Oaks Drive. In addition, a 65 foot building line is provided from the eastern property line of lot 1. All building lines and setbacks are adequate, Drainage is a particular concern and the enp.inrering department is continuing its review of atay related plans and concerns, The developer and his engineer were informed by staff that all corrected engineering plans and requirements were due by Monday, January 24, 1983, otherwise, the Development Review Com- mittee could not offer a recommendation of approval to the Planning and Zoning Commission at its special galled meeting of January 26, 1983, The developer advised staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission the proposed North.Texas Industrial Park Phase I (final plat) February 1, 1983 Page 2 development would not take place if final pplat approval is not granted by the City Counci] by February 1, 1983, The Development Review Committee, and the Engineering Depart- ment specifically aid everything possible to accommodate the developer's r,^quest for a speedy, yet thorough review; however, the deadline for having corrected engineering plans submitted was not met. Because ade- quate engineering plans had not been submitted in time for a complete review, and a cursory review seemed to indicate that there were otill inadequacies with the required plans, the Engineering Department recommended denial of the final plat at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of January 26, 1983, The developer and engineer both acknowledged the fact that proper engineering plans had not been submitted within the specified time period, but appeal was made for conditional approval of the final, plat pending receipt of adequate plans before final City Council action on February 1, 1983, The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the senti- ments of both staff and the developers, and subsequently, recommended approval of the final plat with the condition that adequate engineering plans be submitted in time for proper review prior to final City Council action; they further recommended that the final plat be denied if corrected nigineering plans are not received by February 1, 1983, Staff is continuing its review of the final plat and plans at the. time of this writing and will provide the City Council with addi- tional information, a technical analysis and a recommendation at the meeting of February 1, 1983, Although flexibility is wvrranted and necessary, there is great concern over con- ditional plat approval and the practice of scheduling final plats for final City Council action when there are centain inadequacies or a failure on the part of the developer to comply with stated regulations, policies and deadlines, The P1Bnning and Zoning Commission has pledged that they will strongly consider specific recommendations on how to approach, and prevent, situations similar to this one in the future, North Texas industrial Park Phase i (final. p1RO February 1, 1983 Page 3 ACTION REQUIRED; Approval or denial of the final plat, RECOMMENDATIM The Planning and %oning Commission reoom- mends approval of the final plat of lots l and 2, block 1, North Texas Industrial Park - Phase I, by a vote of 6-1, condi- tionally upon everything being taken care of to satisfaction of staff and City Engineer before the February 1, 1983 City Council meeting, that if it is not taken care of before the City Council meeting of February 1, '1983, that it be denied, ALTERNATIVES; Approve, deny or table the final plat; of North Texas Industrial Park, Phase I, ATTACHMENTS; 1, Reduced plat 2, Development Review Committee minutes of meeting of January 11, 1983. 3. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of January 26, 1983. David Ellison Development Review Planner CURVE DATA rr No. An~_ R04146 "Ls +n C d Tel om O 410 6310" IN 646000 151,951 2464{9 142062 4r "33" Out 406000 (06.1e1 294.460 1 601 ® W 12'>1" W 146. 24$ 11 14t621 116.i(L6 41" 12 S31 It 406 000 291.160 to$ 061 162164 NOPtN rtAAf INW9iRIA. PAgR, PHA9t (`hL VICINITY MAP F. NO 6CALe p c i i NORTH TEXAS INDUSTRIAL. PARK Uwn6r lj7 4! Ne9"4vo0"e N ~ 19.ee' ~ ~i 4q5 2e 'f W W ; It2,~A• a 0: •J ~ ~ 60 ~1N Ci V)1 y ti I ~ 2p 1h 0. nWl W ( 2,62' e~C / SHADY OAKS OR. 3~_ T 2 LOT I 3f.01z a 3 ° g UNPLArTE ° g BLOCK ONE W j 190.00 160.00 26.00;~ 669^41.00M AlG f0'RONO-/llf OKN17 101f1.I0N 06~N15 ~•Il•INII~aril fl, D.N. 3 \SW.C. (CALLl0) 97 AC. TP, Ail. OLANCOC 70 U.N, IA7, JAN. 9, 1804,M1166, O.A. ROBERT PARHAM Ownir cc / a MINUTES Development Review Committee January 11, 1983 PRESENT: Chuck Carpenter, Jerzy Clark, Jackie Doyle, Greg Edwards, David Ellison, Jack Gentry, Wayne Horsley, Earl Jones, Don McLaughlin and Tommy Stone II. Final Plat of North 'T'exas Industrial Park, Phase I, Engineering A. Both curves preferably should have centerline radius of minimum 400 feet. B. Engineering plans are not complete, Developer ana engineer have submitted additional information but review of revised plans is not complete. C. On plat, call out all bearin s and distances between pins; calA out all Njacent property owners; permanent marker is not referenced. (See marked up plat,) D. General notes (Item #G-4) E. Drainage study does not show information needed to prove that 100 year flood will pass within the building lines, (Item SS-7 and SS-8) F, Drainage boundary lines do not show what area will drain into the proposed street. (Item SS-5, SS-6) G. Do not show plan profile of proposed 18" pipe. (Item SS-4) N, Details for headwalls and for flow at end of pipe not shown. (Item G-6) I, Need curve data and width of night-of-way on street, (Item G-5) J. No reference to City of Denton Bench Marks, (Item G-7) K. Label existing ground lii-,e, Is this centerline or at some reference line? ('Item G-2) ti Minutes Development Review committee North Texas Industrial, Park, Phase I January 11 1983 Page 2 ' L. "0;4% grade of ve rticle tangent line does not match calculated grades, (Item S•-2) rf. Give existing grade where proposed matches existing pavement, (Item Gp6~emen~ N, Sanitary sewer profile not reviewed requirements, Lines are not in for Engineering preliminar accordance with per eommenrspofnE We expect these Co be revised Development Review Ecomrni Jones at January 11, 1983. meeting. 0' Any cuts or falls needed as to insure that water does pond will be shown on the plans. - posed contours on the lots Show pro , and any rerouting of existing channel and street, in p (Item S•-4) n I- actions P. Setback Off Shad r uld in fact, each steetkexposure shouldih v 25 feet; mum 25 foot setback, ave a mini Fire Q. Show second fire hydrant ;hat was discussed and agreed to, hater and Sewer R. More water line to south side of Shady Oaks Drive; line should be 8" in size. S, Show second fire, hydrant, T. Sewer line shoull be moved to north side of Shady Oaks Drive; line should be 8" in size, G 7-- U. Define general utility easement all the Woodrow Lane and along south side of Shady Oaks Drive, -lay to , Lone Star Gas V. Need 10' general purpose easement Woodrow Lane. Will serve all Che way to property from the front, Minutes Uevelo msnt Review Committee North Mas Industrial Park, Phase I January 11, 1983 Page 3 Electrical W. Will serve buildings from existing lines along the rear; will consider front for future re- quirements. X. New estimate is needed on street lights. Planning and Community Development Y. The Vinal plat and plans were submitted on January b, 1983. This plat did not meet the fifteen (15) day deadline; therefore, it cannot be scheduled for the January 19, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission meetingg, In addition, staff has not received the required $55,00 final plat filing fee and subdivision application form. ' Z. The next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is February 2, 1983. The Development ReviewCommittee will continue to review thin plat and will recommend approval at the February 2, 1983 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting pro- vided, (1) the application form and filing fee is submitted by January 17, 1983 and (2) all corrections and revisions to plats and plans are made and submitted by 12;00 p.m,, January 27, 1983. minutes planning and Zoning Commission January 2G, 1983 Page 3 B. Approval of the final plat of North Texas Industrial Park, Phase 1. (UNAPPROVED) Mr, Edwards referred to Development Review Committee minutes of January 11 which listed 15 engineering com- ments that developer and engineer had been requested to correct, Plans were received on Monday, January 17, but only one of the 15 items had been satisfactorily oor- rected. Ile said at that tame staff talked to developer and engineer and indicated that if corrections were made and plans received by Monday, January 24, that staff ti4ould recommeccd approval. Plans were not received until Development Review Committee meeting at 10100 a.m. on Tueaday, January 25. Engineering staff has had some discussion with engineer and developer on new plans but has not had time to completely review plans and at this time is recommending that plat not be approved. On question, he said developer was aware of corrections needed. Tom Pouts, developer, stated he acquired this 100 acre industrial park recently, that lie knew at the time lie acquired property there was a planned development exist- ing on it but also knew that City of Denton had granted a lot of totally wrong buildings in that PD, He said that this property has been shown to people interested in bringing industry to Denton but because of PD re- quirements there has been little development. He now has a client who will develop the property as a storage/warehouse type industry to be leased to Andrew Corporat!on, which industry will employ approximately 20 people. lie said that PD-17 requires that Woodrow be widened and he is agreeable to giving 35 feet for widen- ing, that he knows he will have to improve street but does not ot want to now due to county plans for ne-w jail and because of tying into roads serving mall. Be said he does not plan to build right on Woodrow. He is put- ting in a sewer line '.:o accommodate this one particular building. He has a client ready to go now and doesn't have time to do drainage stud; for entire park, that client has been told is would be ready Hie middle of Marcht therefore, City Council approval is needed on February 1, that a two week dela;i will have the effect of killing the proposed industry for Denton. J hiinutep Planning and Zoning Comliiiealon January 26, 1903 Page 4 Mr, Fouts continued that City Engineer now tiaa the planar that he is asking Planning and Zoning Commission to approve pleat subject to plans satisfying the City Engineer, theft if it is not 100 percant correct before the February 1 City Council meeting; he will cal?. Andrew and tell them sorry, we can't get it. He said that this lot 1 is one foot above flood level, that lie is actually not required to do drainai~e plans but is bemuse he doesn't want any flood problemp. He said they will do drainage, but not Woodrow Street.. Bill Nash, engineer, has assured him that he now has everything readyi that lie realizes be is asking an exception but feels it is justified inasmuch as it will be bringing an industry to Denton that will employ about 20 people and which will expand in the future. Chairmal askod Mr, Edwards if lie would have time to review plans before Tuesday night City Council meeting and -9uggeste;l approving the plat subject to approval of City Engineer. Mr. Edwards advised Commission tngt conditional approval has been given in the p+aot which caused problems, that staff is trying to get :away from conditional approval and lie feelei that developer had adequate time to get corrected plats to him for review. Mr. Nash advised that all engineering comments have been satisfied, that an error was made by a new engineer with his firm which caused the delay. Chairman commented that he would like to see new indus- try come to Denton and if at all possible lie would like to approve plat subject to engineering comments being satisfied, [in said tie would come to City Council meet- ing Tuesday night in support of Planning and Zoning Com- mission rec.,mmendation if staff so desired. Mr. Ellison advised thin staff has many timoa had people come in and say they have to have approval now, that it creates tremendous prohlems in scheduling and getting information to City Council, He further stated that it is attitude of Planning and Community Development De- partment not to recommend conditional approval of plats to City Council, that normally plats are put on consent agenda and Cty Council, relies on Planning and Zoning Commission to make a determination as to whether or not they should be approvo6. Minutes Planning and Zoning commission January 26, 1983 fare 5 C On gUostion, Mr, louts staid contract does have a bad weather clause but he again emphasized that a delay of two weeks would kill. the project. On question about the 30 foot "Alex Aickie" road shown on plat, Mr, Vdwarda said it is a dedicated road but im- provoment of that road would not be required as a part of this plat. On direct question, Mr. Edwards said tae would }:.ve time tc, review plans one time before going to City Council Tuesday night, On further question, lie said lie didn't knew whether one time would be enough, that if plat was not satisfactory, he would recommend against it, Mr. Watkins said that if planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval tonight, staff is asking that this be the last time a conditional approval is given on a plat. Cie said staff will no longer recommend condi- tional approval of plats that department simply cannot function that way. Mr. Sidor stated that he appreciates staff's concern of wanting to do a good Job, that they are working on short fuse, that he is sure Mr. Fouts is also very concerned because of short fuse. Since planning and. Zoning Com- mission meets on Wednesday and the City Council on Tuesday, he said he can appreciate that these things have come up in past but snider circumstances lie moved to recommend approval final plat of lots 1 and 21 block 1, North Texas Industrial park - phase I conditionally upon everything being taken care of to satisfaction of staff and City Engineer before the February 1 City Council meeting, that if it is not take" care of before the City Council mee-.'ing of February 11 that. It be denied. Ms. Mays seconded motion as it is her understanding that staft will recommend denial of plat if all requirements are not met before the City Council meeting She asked what could be done to aep this from happening again. Chairman suggested that that probl.am be addreased at a future study session if staff had some ideas. Mr. Watkins, Mr. Edwards and Mr. Ellison said they had some ideas. r~inu~.~s vlanning and Zoning Commission January 26, 1983 Page 6 Chairman LaForte stated he appreciates staff being put in position where developers allow up and say they are losing dollars, that lie is not saying that s case this time but that it does exists llowever, he does think weighing all these things and in ba.lunce it is better in this instance to provide conditional approval. Vote was called on motions Aye - Claiborne, Cole, Juron, LaForte, Mays and Sidor Nay - 2scue Motion carried. (6•-1) CITY OP' DENTON MEMORANDUM TO Mayor and Members of t1le City Council FROM, Charlotte Allen, City Secretary DATEi January 27, 1983 SUBJECT: Back-up Material for Agenda Item #6 Counr,iI Member Chew called and requested this item ba ,)laced on the Agenda. 'T'here is no written hack-up material for this item. J r1o to A11en ca 06180 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MVNICIPAI. 81JILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76101 TFLEPHONE (817)5668200 MEMORANDUM To. The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Bill Angelo, Senio, Administrative Assistant DATE: Januar; 24, 1983 SUBJECT: Anvnendments to the Public Health Code ipropo ssues d ordinance I have included for your consideration a copy of the which would allow the City/County Health Officers to for violations of the City of Denton Health Code. The authority to issue citations for Health Code violations was requested by represen- i mptives 1e efficiency City/County eDepartment nforcement activities. Under the existing system the Health Officers are required to file formal charges with the City Attorney's office when a violation exists. process is somewhat cumbersome and consuming when compared This addition, to the alternative process of issuing cil.ations. In ad filing of formal charges could be considered a very drastic action when only minor violations occur. The Staff has reviewed this ordinance and feel that its adoption would be advantageous to the City of Denton and the City/County Department. Therefore, we recommend that the City Council approve the adoption of this ordinance. Should you have any questions or comments on this matter, please _let us know. 42espectfully submitted, Hill Angelo Attachments; Proposed Ordinance Letter from Denton City-Dounty Health Drpartment 13A/yg DENTON CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DEOARTMENT 1. COURTHOVSE ON THE SQUARE DENTON, TEXAS 76201 617!SOT•OE CG Y A January 25, 1989 Mr. Bill Angelo Assistant City Manager City of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Re; power'to issue citations by the City Health Officer(s). Dear Mr, Angelo; Please be informed that the Environmental Health Division of the Denton City--County Health Department would like to formally request as part of our food service enforcement procedure the authority to issue citations. The above request is being made as a means to further the efficiency and effectiveness of this Departments daily enforcement efforts, The authority to issue citations would be especially helpful in the case of minor code violations when a complete closing of the food service establishment would not be warranted, if you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, i LC ;gierill, R, S, #1306 Chief Sanitarian Margn et Hutchinson Administrator Dentou City-County Health Department JL/rp + N0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLd III OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY PROVIDING MR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITTEN CITATIONS TO PERSONS IN VIOLATION OF HEALTH LAWSI MAKING IT UNLAWFUL TO GIVE THE ISSUING OFFICER A FALSE NAME OR TO FAIL TO APPEAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CITATION.* PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM FINE OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOFI PROVIDING FOR A SrVERAHILITY CLAUSE AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt HERBdY ORDAINSi I SECTION I, That Article III of Chapter 11 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, b~ amenJed to provide for a new Section 11-42 which shall hereafter read as followsi "Section 11-42, ENFORC in8NT (1) The Director of the City-County Health Department or any of his designated employees, heteinafter each referred to as a "health officer", shall have the responsibility and power to enforce the provisions of this Chapter within the confines of the City of Denton, Texas, (2) Whenever a health officer determines that there has been a violation by any person of this Chapter or of a state law for which said officer has the responsibility or authority to enforce, said health officer may prepare a written notice for said person to appear in court. Such notice shall contain the name of the person, the violations committed by such person and the time and place when and where such person shall appaar in court. Such notice shall have a place for such person to give his written signature promising to appear in accordance with its terms, 3. It shall be unlawful for any, person giving his written promise to appear in court, by signing the written notice prepared by the health officer, to fail to appear in accordance with its terms. 4. It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly give the health officer a false name when such officer requests the name of said person for purposes of enforcing the provisions of the Chapter." SECTION 11. Section 11-43 through Section 11-49 Reserved, SECTION III. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements PAGE 1 ~1~lasllAa®ere~Aem~rw~'rwsRe~aer~ - thereof, shall be guilty of y misdemeanor punishable hy a fine not less than Ten Dollars ($10.00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), Each such person shall be deemeil guilty of a separate offenso for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of 0110 ordinance is oommitted, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations ouch person shall be punished within the limits above, SECTION IV. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any parson or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the val)dity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares It would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity, SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become etleative fourteen (14) days from the date of Its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1983. RICRARD 0, STEWART, MAY05 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTES'rt CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SEC ETAR CITY OF DENTON# TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CI'T'Y ATTORNEY CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS F4 Y t PAGE 2 - J' CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: February 1 1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SE EXACT R ING S ITEM IS TO B PLACED ON AGENDA) Approval of the rovised weed ordinance, SUMMARY t In order to better serve the citizens in the abatement of weed and grass oomplaintst we felt the need to update the current weed ordinance. These changes will allow for more stringent adherence to the code. FISCAL SUMMARYt Not Applicable. ACTION REQUIRED: Council should approve the ordinance. ALTERNATIVESt Council could not approve the ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval. EXHIBITS: 1. Memo to Rick Svehla II. Ordinance R Sve a Assistant City Manager t CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOi Rick svehla FROMI Robbie Baughman DATEi January 180 1983 SUBJECTi Revision of Weed Ordinance As discussed previously, I have felt the need to revise our. existing ordinanne pertaining to the abatement of weeds and grass located on privately owned properties. I have contacted Ghe following municipalities in regard to weed enforcement? Arlington, Bedford, Carrollton, Dallas, Euless, Farmers Branch, Fort Worth, Garland, Grand Prairte, Irving, Lewisville, Mesquite, Plano and Richardson. After review of their ordinances, Joe Morris aned I havd held several meet,tngs during the process of perparing the attached proposed ordinance. A copy of the current ordinance is also attached. Major revisioni3 or additions of the proposed ordinance include; 1. Removal of the exemption of (A) Agriculturally zoned property, however, agricultural crops under cultivation are exempt frog; the ordinance. 2. Property owners of lots, tracts or parcels of land of two or more acres are required to maintain the first 100' of area as measured from any open public street or adjacent property under different ownership on which habitable dwellings are located. 3. The previsions of this article are also applicable to all railroad rights-of-way within the City. 4, mould the property owner fail or refuse to pay mowing charges and an administrative tee of $35.00 within thirty (30) days of mailing, the proposed ordinance provides for a lien to be filed against the property until all expenses are recovered. According to information provided to me bt, the Accounting Department, approximately $4,000.00 was "charged off" ar3 uncollected mowing fees for the year of 1981. It is my understanding that the Legal Department was successfui in collecting a portion of this amount. During the year of 1982, these chark,es, as such, were greatly reduced. This proposed ordinance should insure collection of all mowing expenses at some time as property ownership changes or is transferred. Page 2 Revision of Weed Ordinance An attempt has been made to eliminate any potential problem areas in this document, if adopted, it is my feeling it will aid in the abatement of reed and grass violations within the city, This change in the Code of ordinances should also be reflected in future budgets, Please review and place on the agenda for Counoil action if no problems exist as prepared. Ro a Baug man Building inspector i 262L 40. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 12 ("WELDS ON PRIVATE PREMISES") OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON AND ENACTING A NEW ARTICLE V REGULATING THE HEIGHT OF, AND REQUIRING THE CUTTING OF CERTAIN WEEDS, GRASS AND UNCULTIVATED VEOETATIONt "PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS, ABATEMENT BY THE OITY, ASSESSMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE AND COLLECTION OF COSTS? PROVIDING FOR A LIEN FOR DELINQUENT COST, INTEREST THEREON AND FORECLOSURE THER$OFt PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED COLLARS (000.00) FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOPi REP4"ALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLIM PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND DECLARING All EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSs SECTION I. That the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended by repealing in its entirety Article V of Chapter 12 of said Code and enacting a new Article V of Chapter 12 which shall hereafter read as follows, ARTICLE V. GRASS AND WEEDS Section 12-26. Height limitations on certain weeds, grass and uncultivated vegetation. A. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, partnership, association, owner, agent, losses, occupant or anyone having control or supervision of any lot, tract, or parcel of land, or portion thereof, occupied or unoccupied, improved or unimproved, within the corporate limits of the City to suffer or permit grass or weeds or other vegetation, except agricultural crops, trees, shrubs, flowers or other decorative or ornamental plants under cultivation, to grow on an average to a greater height then twelve inches (12") upon said promises, or to leave such weeds or grass upon any premises after the same have been cut. B. with respect to lots, tracts or parcels of land of two or more acres under single ownership, tk.a provisions of this section shall not be applicable to the area in excess of one hundred feet (100') from any open public street or way, or to the area in excess of one hundred feet (100') from any adjacent PAGE 1 property under dilferent ownership on which habitable dwellings ara located. C. The provisions of this Article shall be applicable to all railroad rights-of-way within the City. D. shall be thv duty of any person, firm, corporation, partnership, association, owner, agent, lessee, ocoupant or anyone having supervision or control of any lot, tract, parcel of land or portion thereof, occupied or unoccupied, improv^d or unimproved, within the corporate limits of the City to out, or cause to be cut,, and remove, or cause to be removed, if necessary, to comply with this section, all such grass, weeds, and/or other vegetation as often as may be necessary to comply with, the provisions of this section. Section 12-27, Notice to owner of Violationar Abatement by Cityt Collection of Costs, In the event that the owner of any lot, tract or parcel of lard or portions thereof shall fail or refuse to comply with Section 12-26, then the City Manager or his designee shall notify such owner by letter addressed to him at his post office address, or by publication as many as two (2) times within ton (10) consecutive Jaye, if personal service may not be had as aforesaid or if the owner's address be not known, and at the ex-,Aration of ten (10) days after notification es provided herein, the City may enter upon such premises and may do such work as necessary, or cause the same to be done, in order that the premises may comply with the requirements of this Article. A statement ^f the cost incurred by the city to abate such condition shall be mailed to the owner of 'said promisee, which statement shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the data of the mailing thereof. Such Cost shall include an administrative fee of Thirty-Five Dollars ($35,00), in addition to the actual cost of cutting or removing such vegetation. In the event that said statement has not been paid within such period, the City Manager or his designee may file a statement with the County PAGE 2 Clerk of the expenses incurred to abate such condit on on said premises, and the City shall have a privileged lien c any lot, tract or parcel of land upon which such expense tE incurred second only to tax liens and Ilene for street impr vements, together with ten (10%) percent on the delinquent amo it from the date such payment is due, For any such expendit ra and interest, as aforesaid, suit may be instituted and recove:y and foreclosure had in the riiime of the City and the statement so made, as aforesaid or a certified copy thereof shall be priwa facie proof of the amount expended in any ouch work performed by the City. Section 12-28 to 12-30. Reserved, SECTION II. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a aom not less than Ten Dollars (1110.00) nor excee.,ing Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00)i and each day and every day that the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitdte a separate and distinct O`fertse. This penalty is in addition to and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be available at law and equity. SECTION III, All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with tha germs or provisions conrained in this ordinance are hereby repealed ~o the extent of any such conflict. SECTION IV, That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstAnce is tell invalid by any court of conpetent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of ;.his ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it PAGE 3 e.~rrr re»>~s~ wrald have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City secretary is herehy directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED this the # day of 19,_ RICF~4S9 RT, t OR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY-MMM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 9Y1 PAGE 4 CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING; February 1, 1983 CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT IOROING AS ITEM IS TO BE ~IACfp ON AGENDA) Repealing the No parking zone in the 200 131ock of lm Street o a oca volitclos to park on the East side of Elm Street from its intersection with Second Street to its intersection with Third Street. SUMMARaI, originally this no parking zone was to protect school children from running between parked cars. Now there are approximately 129 students at the school that are bussed to the facility. Removal of the sw parking would help the food service personnel who bring food to the school for students and staf'.*, FISCAL SUMMARY: ACTION REQUIRED; Removal of the no parking signs. ALTERNATIVES: To disapprove the ordinance, STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS; Approve ordinance in accordance with citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission reconamendation, r EXHIBITS: I ~r ~ NO, AN ORUINANCE REPEALING THE NO PARKING ZONE IN THE 1200 BLOCK OF ELM STREET TO ALLOW THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL,M STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH SECOND STREET TO ITS '4TERSECTION WITH THIRD STREETI AND DECLARING AN P.FFHCTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON IIERE)3Y ORDAINSs SECTION All oruinances prohibitinq.parking ont The east side of the 1200 Block of Elm Street from its intersection with Second Street to ite intersection with Third Stroet, are hereby repealed, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1983. VI-CHARD 2T, CITY OF DENTTON, TEXAS r ATTESTI C ARL TT A Et, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROV'UU AS TO LEGAL FORMI C. J. TAYLOR, JH,i CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DF:NTON, TEXAS HY1 308L PACE ONE MINUTES ` CITIZVN'S 'T'RAFFIC SAFET%' SUPPORT COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING DECEMBER 15, 1982 3:30 P.M. Presents Bernstein,1ejKen~~r Robinsonp Vix i is Autrey, Gilbert Chipman Absents Bob George (death in his family) Staffs Greg Edwards, Koorosh Olyai, Clovis Georgo, loan navls 1. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Solomons TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBnR 20, 1982 AS WRITTEN. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on the west sid,~ of Locust Street by the First State Bank. Stacey BUY'kholter, reprosonting First State Bank sptake stating that there have been 6 accidents at this location and that customers have complained at the bank. Fie also stated that only 5 parking spaces would be eliminated and that the First State Bank has offered use of their parking lot for individuals interested in using the facility. Motion was made by Bernstein. and seconded by Kane TO TABLE THIS REQUEST UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING WHEN STAFF COULD REPORT FEEDBACK FROM CRAVEN'S AND THE HARDWARE STORE CONCERNING THEIR OPINION OF REMOVING OF THE PARKING AND STAFF COULD GET AN EXACT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS AT THAT LOCATION. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on the south side of Third Street between Elm and Locust. Staff stated that the street is 251-26' wide which is relatively narrow. Motion was 'made by Kane and seconded by Robinson TO REMOVri PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDS OF THIRD STREET BETWEEN ELM AND LOCUST. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking along U.S. 380 east near the Flea Market. It was noted that this area is quite dangerous on the weekends of the Flea Market and that quite a few cars park on the shoulde.cs of the highway. Motion was made by Chipman and seconded by Robinson TO ASK TfIE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO INSTALL NO ' PARKING SIGNS ALONG U.S. 380 EAST NEAR THE FLEA MARKET. Motion passed unanimously. Page 2 December 15, 1982 Minutes 5, Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on Loop 288 in front of the guard rail, north of McKinney Street. It was noted that this in a dangerous area and a problem when large trucks park along this area. Motion w4is made by Gallian and seconded by Robinson TO ASK THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO INSTALL NO LARKING SIGNS ALONG LOOP 288 IN FRONT OF THE GUARD RAIL, NORTH OF VICK1NNEY STRLL'T. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Discussion Was hold concerning the request of the Red Wagon Courier Service for a loading zone at 211 Cedar. This would take the place of 1 of the 2 hour parking spaces and would cost $150.00 for' the first year and $75.00 for each year thereafter, Motion was made by Solomons and seconded by Chipman TO TABLE THIS REQUEST UNTIL NEXT MEX'TIN,G WHEN STAFF WILL REPORT WHETHER THIS RLQUEST QUALIFINS UNDER THE LOADING ZONE ORDINANCE. Motion passed unanimously. 7, Discussion was hold concerning the request for a guard rail on Shady Oaks Drive. The speed limit is 30 mph along the curve and the curve can be dangerous when the streets are wet. Guard rails oor:t approximately $3-$5 per lineal l foot, Staff stated that advance warning signs for this location have been ordered and will be installed and buttons will be placed along the centerline of the road. Motion was made by Kane and Seconded by Gallian TO WATCH THE AREA AND SEE IF THE WARNING SIGNS AND BUTTONS WORK BEFORE PUTTING UP A GUARD RAIL, Motion passed unanimously. 8. Discussion was hold concerning the request for removal of the no parking zone on the east side of the 5.200 block of Elm Street. Staff stated that originally this no parking zone was to protect school children from running between parked ears. Now there are approximately 129 students at the school that are bussed to the facility. Removal of the no parking would help the food service personnel who bring food to the school for students and staff. Motion was made by Solomons and seconded by Kane TO REMOVE THE NO PARKING ZONE 014 THE EAST SIDE OF THE 1200 BLOCK OF ELM STREE'T'. Motion passed unanimously. i Page 3 December 15, 1982 Minutes Old Business 1. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parkirq on the south side of Sawyer Street between Austin and Locust, Notices were mailed to 7 residents in the area, 2 were returned against the request and 3 were returned in favor. It was noted that the street: is very narrow with packing on both sides and difficult for emergency equipment to get in and out. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Solomons TO REMOVE THE PARKING ON '111 SOUTH SIDE OF SAWYER STREET BETWEEN AUSTIN AND LOCUST. Motion passed unanimously, 2. Discussion was held concerning the proposed truck ordinance. Several members felt that the proposed ordinance dealt mainly with truck parking and did not feel that the ordinance was really what was needed. Motion was made by Robinson and seconded by Gallian TO TABLE THIS ISSUE; AND DISCUSS I1' AT A LATER DAT WHEN A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE COULD BE AT THE MEETING 'C'0 ANSWER QUESTIONS. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Discussion was held concerning the speed study done on Teasley Lane. Drawings of the existing speed limit proposed by District 18 and the .1peed limit approved by Austin were studied. Traffic Safety Commission felt that. the speed limit proposed by District 18 best suits the safety needs along Teasley Lane, especially near the Sam Houston school. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Robinson to request the Highway Department in Austin to reconsider the speed limit proposed by District 18. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting ad;journc~d at 5:35 a CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: February 1, 1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM IS TO RE PLACED ON AGENDA) No-Parking on the south side of Third Street between Elm and Locust, SUMMARY; The Sanitation Department has been experiencing problems with parked cars on the south side of Third Street blocking their exit from the alley between College and Third, This ordinance would back-up the existing signs and allow towing of parked vehicles along this street, FISCAL SUMMARY: Signs are in place, ACTION REQUIREW Approve ordinance, ALTERNATIVES: To disapprove the ordinance, STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve ordinance in accordance with Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommendation. EXHIBITS-. r% i I 1 i` i 1 Y N0. AN ORDINANCE PIM:01TING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIRD STREET FVOM ITS INTERSECTION WITH ELM STREET TO ITS INTERSECT ON WITH LOCUST STREETI PROVIDING A SEVERADILITY CLAUSEI PROVIDING A P£NE,LTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DECLARINU AN EFFECTIOE DATE, THE COUIICIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS1 SECTION I. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person I shall park a vehicle at any time upon the following street in { the City of Denton to-wits intersection from t Locust intersection The south Strside of eet to its Third Street with E SECTION IT. The provisions of Section I prohibiting Phe parking of vehicles shall apply at all times to the street and part of streets designated therein except when it is necessary to stop a i vehicle to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer or official traffic control device. SECTION 111, Any person adjudged guilty of parking a vahiclo in violation of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200,00), r SECTION IV. 'Chat if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrsse or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of ..ti competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, heruby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity, PAGE. ONE SECT{ON V. That thJe ordinance s',all become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Sscretary is hereby dirocted to cause the caption of this c:rdinanco to be publlshod twico in the Donton Record-Chroniolo, the official newspaper of the City Of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) clays of tho date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1983, L~~ , STEWART, Y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATT E M C R T N, . T ECR 'P ' CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LSOAL FORM C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF Di:NTON, TEXAS BY t i 307L PAGE TWO r1I N U'i'E ~ i CITIZEN'S TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING DECEMBER 15, 1982 3:30 P,M. Pre6ont Rocky Kane, Burt Salomons, Wayne Autrey, Gilbert Bernstein, Ken Robinson, Virginia Gallian, Doris Chipman Absents Bob George (death in his family) Staff: Greg Edwards, Koorosh Olyai, Clovis Georgo, Joan Davis 1. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Solomons TO APPROVE THE 'MINUTES OF OCTOBER 20, 1982 AS WRITTEN. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on "the west side of Locust Street by the First, StPte Bank. Stacey Burkholter, representing First State Btink spoke stating that there have been 6 accidents at this location and that customers have complained at the baihk. lie also stated that only 5 parking spaces would be eliminated and that the First State Bank has offered use of their parking lot for individuals interestea in using the facility. Motion 'was made by Bernstein and seconded by Kane TO TABLE THIS REQUEST 'UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING WHEN STAFF COULD' REPORT FEEDBACK FROM CRAVEN'S AND THE HARDWARE STORE CONCERNING THIR OPINION OF REMOVING OF THE PARKING AND STAFF COULD 68T A10 EXACT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS AT THAT 'LOCATION. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on 'the south side of Third 'Street between Elm and Locust. Staff stated that the street is 251=26' wide which is relatively narrow. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Robinson TO 'REMOVE PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIRD STREET BETWEEN ELM AND LOCUST. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking along U.S. 380 east near the Flea Market. It was noted that this area is quite dangerous on the weekends of the Flea Market and that quite a few cars park on the shoulders of the highway. Motion was made by Chipman and seconded by Robinson TO ASK THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO INSTALL NO PARKING SIGNS ALONG U.S. 380 EAST NLAR THE FLEA MARKET. Motion passed unanimously. I Page 2 December 15, 1982 Minutes 5. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on Loop 288 in s:ront of the guard rails north of McKinney Street. It was noted that this is a dangerous area and a problem when large trucks park along this aroa. THE Motion wao made by Gallian and seconded by Robinson To K HI DEPARTMENT TO NOPARKING SIGNS RTH OF bLONG LOOP 28R Motion FRONT OF THE GUARD passed unanimously. 6. Discussion was held concerning the request of the Red Wagon Courier Service for a loading zone at 211 Cedar, would take the place of 1 of the 2 hour parking spaces and would cost $150.00 Lor the first year and 9'x`/5.00 for each year thereafter,, Motion was, made by;Solomuns and seconded by Chipman TO TABLE, THIS REQUEST UNTIL NEXT MEETINQ WHEN STAFF WT''LL REPORT WHETHER THIS REQUEST QUALIFIES UhUER THE LOADING ZONE ORDINANCE. Motion passed unanimously. 7. b+,scussion was held conce nspeadh limit requ ist 30. rma guard rail l , on Shady Oaks Drive, The r when the streets the dangerous curve and the curve can be dan,i ~5 per lineal wet. Guard rails cost approximately $3- for this foot. Staff stated that advance warning signs location have been ordered and will be install the droand buttons will be placed along the eentesl', Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Gallian TO WATCH THE AREA AND SEE IF THE,. WARNING SIGNS, AND BUIXTONS WORK BEFORE PUTTING UP A GUARD RAIL, Motion passed unanimously. 3. Discussion was held concerning the request for removal of the n-) parking zone on the east side of the 1200 block of Elm Street. Staff stated that originally this no parking zone was to protect school children from running between parked cars. Now there are approximately 129 students at Removal of the the school that are bushed to the facility. no parking would help the food service personnel who bring food to the school for students and staff. Motion was made by Solomons and seconded by Kane TO REMOVE THE NO PARKING ZONE ON THE EAST SIDE OF VIE 1100 BLOCK OF ELM STREET. Motion passed unanimously. Y Page 3 December 15, 1982 I Minutes Old Business 1, Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on the :youth side of Sawyer street between Austin and Locust, Notices were mailed to 7 residents in the area, 2 were returned against the request and 3 wore returned in favor. it was noted that the street is very narrow with parking on both sides and difficult for emergency equipment to get in and out. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Solomons TO RL41OVE THE PAriKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAWYER STREET BETWEEN AUSTIN AND LOCUST. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Discussion was held concerning the proposed truck orcinance. Several members felt that the proposed ordinance dealt mainly with truck parking and did not feel that the ordinance was really what was needed. Motion was made by Robinson and seconded by Gallian TO TABLE THIS ISSUE AND DISCUSS IT AT A LATER DATE WHEN A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE ATTORNE'Y'S OFFICE COULD BE All, THE MEETING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. Motion passed unanimously. Discussion was held concerning the speed study done on 3. Teasley Lane. Drawings of the existing speed limit proposed by District 18 and the speed limit approved by Austin were studied. Traffic Safety Commission felt that the speed limit proposed by District 18 best suits the safety needs along Teasley Lane, especially near the Sam Houston school. Notion was made by Kane and seconded by Robinson to request the Highway Department in Austin to reconsider the speed limit proposed by District 18. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 505 CITY OF DENTON / t4EMORAN DUM DATE OF MEETING: Fobruary 11982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT' WORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA) No parking on the South side of Sawyer Street between Austin and %ocust. SUMMARY: Sawyer is a narrow residential street neat Twcl. Parking is currently restricted on 0he south side of Sawyer between Oakland and Austin, Adjacent residents have requested this action, FISCAL SUMMARY: Cost of installing, new No-parking signs will be approximately $300, Funds are available in the Traffic Control btiidget, ACTION REQUIRED: Approve ordinance ALTERNATIVES: To disapprove the ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve ordinance in accordance with Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommendation, EXHIBITS: N0. AN ORDINANCE FKOHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE $W rl SIDE Of' SAWYER STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH AUSTIN STREET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH LOCUST STREET) PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE) PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDREU DOLLARS) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAIN81 SECTION I. When signs are erected giving notice theroof, no person shall park a vehicle at any time upon the following street in the City of Denton to-wits The &outh aide of Sawyer Street from its intersection with Austin Street to its interseotion with Locust Street, SECTION II. The provisions of SectJon I prohibiting the parking of vehicles shall apply at all times to the street and part of streets designated therein except when it is necessary to stop a vehiole to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer or official traffic control device. SECTION III. Any person adjudged guilty of parking a vehicle in violation of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollard ($200.00. SECTION IV. That if any section, subsection, para3raph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. PAGE ONE S_E'T70N V, That this ordinance shall become effa:tive fourteen (14) days from the date of its passago, and the City secretary is hercoy directed to cause the caption of thia ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Rooord-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1983. tfi tU rr mAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTCSTs MIAJ TTE N, 1' StM-TARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED As TO LEGAL FOPM C. J. TAYLOR, JR.i CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTONr TEXAS SYi 1 301L PACE TWO MINUTES i CITIZEN'S TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION COUNCIL "HAMBERS, MUNICT32AL lIU114DING DECEMBER 15, 1982 3130 P.M. Vresenti Rocky Kane, Burt Solornons, Wayne Autreyr Gilbert Bernstein, Ken Robinson, Virginia Gallian, Doris Chipman Absents Bob George (death in his family) Staff; Greg Edwards, Koorosh 01yai, Clovis George, Joan Davis 1. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Solomons TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 20, 1982 AS WRITTEN. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on the west si$e'of Locust Street by the First State Bank. Stacey Bukkholter, representing First State Ban% spoke stating that there have been 6 accidents at this location and that customers have complained at the bank. Ile also stated 'that only 5 parking spaces woua.d be climinated and that the First State Bank has offered use of their parking lot for individuals interested in using the facility. Motion was made by Bernstein and seconded by Katie TO TABLE WIIS REQUEST UNTIL THE NIIXT MEETING WHEN STAFF COULD REPORT FEEDBACK FROM CRAVEN'S AND THE HARDWARE STORE CONCERNING TIWIR OPINION OF REMOVING OF THE PARKING AND S'T'AFF COULD GET AN EXACT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS AT THAT LOCATION. Motion passed unanimously. ;3. Discussion was held, concerning the request for no parking on the south side of Third 'Street between Elm and Locust. Staff stated that the street is 251-26' wide which is relatively narrow. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Robinson TO REMOVE PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIRD STREET BrTWEEN ELM AND LOCUS'T'. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Discussion was held concerriinr the request for no parking along U.S. 380 east near the Flea Market. It was noted that this area is quite dangerous on the weekends of the Flea Market and that quite a few cars park on the shoulders of the highway. Motion was made by Chipman and seconded by Robinson TO ASK THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO INS'T'ALI, NO PARKING SIGNS ALONG U.S. 380 EAST.' NEAR THE FLEA MARKET. Motion passed unanimously. Page 2 December 15, 1982 Minutes 5, Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on Loop 288 in front of the guard rail, north of McKinney Street, It was noted that this is a dangerous area and a problem when large trucks park alon this area. Motion wDs made by Gallian and seconded by. Robinson TO ASK THE `HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO INSTALL NO PARKING SIGNS ALONG LOOP 288 IN FRONT OF THE GUARD RAIL, NORTH OF MCKINNEY STREET. Motion passed unanimously. 6. D'scussion was held concerning the request of the Red Wagon Courier Service for a loading zone at 211 Cedar. This would take the place of 1 of the 2 hour parking spaces and would cost $150.00 for the first year and $75,00 for each year thereafter, Motion was made by Solomons and seconded by Chipman TO TABLE THIS REQUEST UNTIL NEXT MEETING WHEN STAFF WILL REPORT WHETHER THIS REQUEST QUALIFIH5 UNDER THE LOADING ZONE ORDINANCE. Motion passed unanimously. 7, Discussion was held concerning the request for a guard roil on Shady Oaks Drive. The speed limit is 30 mph along the , curve and the curve can be dangerous when the streets are wet. Guard tails cost approximately $3~-$5 per lineal foot, Staff stated that advance warning signs for this location have been ordered and will be installed and buttons voill be placed along the centerline of the road. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Gallian TO WATCH THE AREA AND SEE IF THE WARNING SIGNS AND BUTTONS WORK BEFORE PUTTING UP A GUARD RAIL. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Discussion was held concerning the request for removal of the no parking zone on the east side of the 1200 block of Llm Street. Staff stated that originally this no parking zone was to protect school children. from running between parked cars. Now there are approximately 129 students at the school that are bussed to the facility. Removal of the no parking would help the food service personnel who bring food to the school for students and staff, Motion was made by Solomons and seconded by Kane TO RFMOVE THE NO PARKING ZONE ON TIAB EAST SIDE OF THE 1200 BLOCK OF ELM STREET. Motion passed unanimously. i I j Cage 3 j Geoember 15, 1982 j I Minutes i I'! Old Business 1. Discussion was held concerning the request for no parking on the south side of Sawyer Street between Austin and Locust. Notices were mailed to 7 residents in the area, 2 were returned against the request and 3 were returned in favor. It was noted that the street is very narrow with parking on both sides and difficult for emergency equipment to get in and out. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Solomons TO REMOVE THE MARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAWYER STREET BETWEEN AUSTIN AND LOCUST. Motion passed unanimously. , 2. Discussion was held concerning the proposed truck ordinance. Several members felt that the proposed ordinance dealt mainly with truck parking and did not feel that the ordinanc,.a was really what was needed. Motion was made by Robinson and seconded by Gallian TO TABLE THIS ISSUE AND DISCUSS IT AT A LATER DATE WHEN A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE COULD BE AT THE MEETING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Discussion was held concerning the speed study done on Teasley Lane. Drawings of the existing speed limit proposed by Distric-. 18 and the speed limit approved by Austin were studied. Traffic Safety Commi;3sion felt that the speed limit pp.-oposed by District 18 best suits the safety needs along Teasley Lane, especially near the Sam Houston school. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Robinson to request the Highway Department in Austin to reconsider the speed limit proposed by District 18. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5:35 CITY OF DENTON' MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: February 1, 1933 M CITY COUNCIL. AGF;NDA ITEM (USE EXACT 14ORDING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA) Truck Route Ordinance', ' r SUMMARY: The C'fSSC has been reviewing and receiving input concerning problems with trucks since May 1932, The proposed ordinance addressrs the problems of unnecessary truck traffic damnging resiclentirl and non- designated streets and the nuisances and safety problems associated with truck traffic and parking on smaller City streets, The exceptions in the ordinance should allow for normal operation for most trucking operations. FISCAL. SUMMARY, ACTION REQUIRED: To approve ordinance, ALTERNATIVES: To disapprove the ordinance, STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS; Council should adopt ordinance in accordance with the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommendation, 4 EXHIBITS: 00 MINUTE'S CITIVoENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION CIVIL DEFENSE ROOM, MUNICIPAL BUILDING JANUARY 5, 1983 3:30 P.M. Presentt Rool,y '.%ane, Wayne Autrey, Gilbert Bernstein, Ken Robinson, Virginia Gallian, Doris Chipman, Bob George Absent: Burt Solomons Staff: Greg Edwards, Koorosh 01yai, Clovis George, Joan Davis 1. Virginia Gallian requested that the wording of item #7 in the minutes of December 15, 1962 be changed to read "Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Gallian TO WATCH THE AREA AND SEE IF THE WARNYNG SIGNS AND BUTTONS WORK." Motion was then made by Kane and seconded by Robinson TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 15, 1982 AS CORRECTED. Motion passed unanimously. 2. A letter was read by Autrey from the Mayor concerning meeting times for City hoards. It asked that members consider what times were best for citizen input to the Doard meetings. A recommendation was made to leave the time for the Traffic Safety Support Commission at 3,30 p.m. ~:s this Board has already spent many hours considering a meeting time and had ;just changed to 3:30 to accommodate all the members. The recommendation was agreed on unanimously. 3. Discussion was lield concerning the truck ordinance. Joe Morris from the city Attorney's office gave some information concerning the ideas to be considered in the truck ordinance. The main discussion was concerning the ideas of trucks as view obstructions, the noise levels, and how and what should be regulated in the ordinance. Joe said that he would make a change in the ordinance concerning a 12x000 pound weight limit. Motion was made by Bernstein and seconded by George TO ACCEPT THE ORDINANCE; WITH Tli:i MINOR CHANGES. Motion passed with 6 voting yes and 1 voting no. saw Page 2 Minutes January 5, 1963 41 A report from Greg Edwards was given concerning the removal of parking on the west side of Locust between Mulberry and Ilalnut. Dick Craven was notified and stated that Craven's had no problem with removing the parking as long as the City would stripe and sign the 2 hour parking area behind their store. Matt Hudson of Tru-Value Hardware was contacted and stated that lie objected to removal of parking because he felt that customers would have no place to park to get to his businass. Ile also folt that customers would not park at the bank and then walk to hie store and that parking around the Square Yeas bad enough without removing 5 more spaces. Motion was made by Chipman and seconded by Ggllian TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOCUST BETWEEN MULBERRY AND WALNUT. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Greg Edwards stated that a letter had been sent to Red Wagon Courier Service requesting some information about the loading zone and no response had been received, This request was tabled until a response was received. 6. Discussion was held concerning the request of St, Andrews Church for a change in the parking situation around their church. Greg Edwards stated that they have had quite a number of problems around thr: park area r.oncorning the parking and felt that the signs had been placed there for a specific purpose. Mr, Taylor from St. AnoLv ws Church explained that many times their church services extended past the 11:00 curfew time and that when visitors came to the church they were ticketed. Motion was made by George and seconded by Gallian TO HAVE THE CHURCH GET STICKERS FOR THE MEMBERS TO PUT ON THEIR CARS TO DESIGNATE 'T'HOSE CARS AS BELONGING ~ TO THE CHURCH AND MAKE SURE THAT VISITORS COT S'T'ICK.ERS /A'0 USE AND THE C:IT t WOULD CHANGE THE SIGNS TO RF AD NO PARKING AF'T'ER 11;00 P.M. EXCEPT FOR CHURCH SERVICLS. Motion passed, unanimously. 7. Discussion was held concerning adoption of the Texas MUTCD. This would give the City Traffic Engineer authority to intall and maintain traffic control devices in the City. The main concern expressed was that it should not take away any control. the Chief of Police may have in an emergency situation. Koorosh stated that in an emergency situation, the (thief of Police would still have the power to make decisions. Motion was made by George and seconded by Gall.ian TO ADOPT THE TEXAS MUTCD. Motion passed unanimously. I~,'1ga 3 Minutes January 5, 1983 c+.)g gave a staff report on the intersection of Sell and Withers stating that the City Council. t.,Ad wanted a report after one month, in the laat month, there have been 3 accidents, oily 1 of which would be correctable by changing the light. Motion was made by Kane and seconded by Robinp.on TO LEAVE THE SIGNAL OF BELL AND WITHERS ON FLASH FOR THE NEXT G MONTHS, WHEN STAFF' WILL, AGAIN GYVE AN ACCIDENT REaPOR7`. Motion passed unanimously. Ken Robinson requested that the City look at the corner of McKinney and Sell and Malone and University and consider moving the arrow further back to give motorists more tt.me to make lane changes, if necessary. Staff will look into it and report back ,at the next meeting, Meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 24»62 OF V'HAPTER 24 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS) ESTABLISHING} DESIGNATED TRUCK ROUTES AND RU'OULATIONS FOR DEPARTURE: THEREFROMI PROVIDING FOR ,EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR A FiAXIMUN PENAL'T'Y OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR VIOLATION THEREOFP PROVIDING FOR A SEVERADILITY CLAUSE? AND DECLARING AN EFFECT'VE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE~CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERESY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That Section 24-67 of Chapter 24 "Traffic" of the Code of Ordtnancsrs of the City of Denton is hereby amended to read as t follows; SECTION 24 67. REGULATION OF VEHICLES WEIGHING OVER 120000 POUNDS. (a) Definitions The following words and phrases, when used in this Section shall muan as follows; 1. "Vehicle" means every mechanical device, in, upon or by which any person or property may be trans- .ported or drawn upon a public highway or street, including motor vhiclos, truck-tractors, road- tractors, trailers, semi. - trailers, and commeroIaI motor vehicles as those terms are defined by state law regulating registration of vehicles (Vornon's Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6675a-1). 2. "Truck" is any-vehicle-:hose gross body weight or whose combinou gross body and load weight exceeds twelve thousand (12,000) pounds. 1. "Gross Body Weight" means the actual weight of the vehicle as registered by the governmental authority which has licensed the vehicle for operation. 4. "Truck Route" is a way ovor certain utreeta, as designated herein, over and along which trucks ooming into, traveling within and going out of the City must operate. (b) Application of Regulations It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or park a truck over, on, along or upon any city street which is not a designated truck route except in accordance with and for the purposes expressly allowed by this Section, (c) Exceptions to Regulations This ordinance shall not prohibit= 1. Origin or Destination. The operator of a truck from departing from a 3esignated truck route for the purposa o£: PAGE 1 .Sw~;vGv iee.L u., .A:"ui. ....n7 v: s""`.^..... ~f:J ~ . (a) leaving or reaching a truck torminall I (b) loading or unloading cargos (o) repair or modification of ouch truck, or (d) reaching or leaving any place where such truck iii used or to be used for the purpose for which i.t was designedt provided, however, that in departing from a designated truck route the operator of said truck shall use the shortest practical routa, which is consistent with the reasonable operation of the vehicle, between the truck route and the point of origin or destination, 2, EMOC9enoy Vehicles. The operation of emergency vehicles upon any street in the City, 3. Utilitiesi Sanitation. The operation of utility or sanitation trucks while engaged in the purpose or business for which the truck is used i or designed. 4, Detoured Trucks. The operation of trucks upon any officially established detour in any case where such truck would lawfully be operated upon the street for which such detour is established. 5. Moving Buildings. The operation of trucks used In moving structures or a building where such moving is clone pursuant to permit. (d) Multiple Destination Points All trucks entering the City and operating thorein which have multiple destination points shall, after leaving the first s destination point, procood to other destination points by the shortest route using streets upon which such truck is parmitteo. (e) Truck Routes Designated C i The following truck routes, to be used in accordance with f the provisions of this Section are hereby established; 1. 'Airport Road from Interstate 35C and Interstate 3514 to Municipal Airport 2. Bell Avenue from Dallas Drive to Mingo Road 3. Bell Avenue from Windsor Drive to Sherman Drive 4. Bonnie Brae from U. S. Highway 71 to Santa Fe Railroad Crossing 5. Carroll Boulevard from Sherman Drivc to Fort Worth Drive 6. Dallas Drive from Eagle to Interstate 351: 7. Eagle Drive from interstate 358 to Dallas Drive PAGE' 2 8, Fort Worth Drive from Eagle to South City Limits Line 9. interstate 35E from South City Itmits Line to junction of interstate 359 and interstate 3514 10, Interstate 35 from North City Limits Line to Junction of Interstate 359 and interstate 35W 11, Interstate 3514 from South City Limits Line to junction of interstate 35E and interstate 35W 12. Locust Street from Eagle North to North City Limits Line 13. Loop 288 from University Drive to Interstate 35E 14, McKinney Street from Carroll Street to East City Limits Line 15. Shady Oaks from Willow springs to Woodrow Lane 16. Sherman Drive from Carroll East and North to North City Limits Line 17. Teasley Lane from Dallas Drive to South City limits Line 18. University Drive from West City Limits Line to East City Limits Line 19. U. S, Highway No. 77 from interstate Highway 35 to Eagle 20. U. S. Highway 377 from South City Limits Line to University Drive 21. Willow Springs Road from Dallas Drive to Shady Oaks 22. Windsor Drive from Bonnie SrA6 to Eaut :,Ad near old orchard Lane 23. Woodrow Lane from East McKinney to Shad" halo (f) Signs The City may cause to be posted appropriate signs and markings on designated truck routes. SECTION IT. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or falls to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding ivo Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereot during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shill bu puniahod within the lim0,5 above. SECTION tilt That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phraso or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is hold invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affeot th.e validity of the remaining portions of t.his ordinanoe, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby dt~clarea it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity, SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourtsen (lt) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to +i published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ton (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1383. RICHARD 0. 5 'E A IT, W R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTFSTs CRARL~ O TC ALLEN CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXA6 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL t=ORNt C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DYi PAGE q 'gnyY„t,~-14,^"... ~.S. q...~~~.. rL nYty.~1~11.r~ "KCYp•. n.u 1tL.!- J+Y~'..+YlMY't)l,1nY NO, AN ORDINANCE RIiOULATING THE OPEFATION OF EMEFAENCY AMBULANCE3 AND TRANSFER AMBULANCES IN THE CITY OF DENTON, M ASI AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADDING THERETO A NTW ARTICLE V REGULATINO EMERGENCY AMBULANCES AND TRANSFER AMBU- LANCF•S, REGULATING ATTENDANTS AND DRIVERS OF AMOULANCESr ANI DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTOM, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I. Chapter 26 of the Code of Ord!nances of the City of Denton. Texas is hereby amended by adding thereto a new Article V rVe. ing as follawai ARTICLC V ANDWANCES Seotion 26.65. Definitions section 26-66. Emergency Servico by Fire Department Section ~16-67. Private Emergency Service Regulations ._Saation_26-68. Transfer Ambulance Service Regulations Section 26-61. ,Attendant/Drivers Regulated Section 26-70. False Statement of Emergency Section 25-65. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this article, the following words an.. phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them i.~, this soctionj (a) ATTENDANT/DRIVER Oeans a person who Is qualified to care for a patient transported yy a transfer ambulance and who it, also qualified to drive a txansfer ambulance, (b) CHIEF OF POLICE means the chief of police of the City cf Denton or his duly authorized representative. (c) CITY means the City of Denton, Texas. (d) DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH means the airector of th,e department designated by the city manager to enforce aad administer this article or the director's authort:e- representative. (e) MMERGENCY means any circumstances that calls for im,-n - diato action and in which the element of time In transports: the sick, wounded or injured for medical treatment is essential PAGE 1 to the health or life 02 the peta•.. Such circumstances 1 include, but arA not limited to, accidents generally, tratflc aocidents, and aetr o: violence resulting in personal injury, and sudden illneae, (f) EMERGENCY AMDULANCE means any motor votilcle especially designed, constructed, equipped, and used for transporting the injured or sick in answer to en emergency call, (g) UIXRGENCY C,',T.L means any request for ambulance service that is made by tulaphone or other means of communication in circumstances which aro, or have been represented to be, an emergency and requiring immediate ambulance service, (h) EMERGENCY RUN means the emergency ambulance trip to the place where the emergency exists, or from the place of such. emax9ency to a hospital, medical clinic, or other appropriate dastlnaLion -for the patient, (i) F" RE DEPARTMENT means the fire department of the City of ire ':on. (j) OPEkATOR means any inoivioual, firm or corporation engaged in the business-, of transporting the injured, woundei, sick or dead and using the streets of trio city for such purpose. (k) STREET raAars any strent, alley, avenue, boulevard, drive or highway commonly used for the n!)r-ne of travel within the corporate limits of the city, (1) TRANSFER AODULANCE means any .aotor vehicle construc,,.ed, equipped and used for transferring the injured or sick under circuirutances which do not constitute an emergency and which have not been represented as an emergency, 5e:tion 26-6b. EMERGENCY SRVICE PrOVIDED EY FINE ',)rPARTNFNTr FEE. (a) The fire department of the city shall provide emergency ambulance servic.c within the city, (b) The city shall charge the following fees for, omorgen-, arbuLancc, services in the city provided in response to a ca-'l PAGC 2 I I received by the tire department requeatiny the servioeai I. $70 60 per person for the transport of a parson from Orly location to a hospital) and 2. In addition to the above, $1.00 per mile per person shall be oharged for the one way distance traveled beyond the juriadiotional limits of the County of. Denton for the transport to or from a location outside the County of Denton. (o) The person receiving emergency ambulance service and any person contracting for the servioe shall be responsible tot payment of the fee. In the case of service received by a minor. the parent or guardian of the minor shall be responsible for payment of the tee. Section 26.67. PRIVATE EMERGENCY SERVICE REGUf.ATIONS, (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, either as owner. agent, or otherwise, other than a member of the fire department, an agency of the United States or the Stalo of TQxas, to furnish, operate, conduct, maintain, advertise or otherwise be engsgoo in or profoes to be oagageti in the operation e2 emergency ambulance aorvice, upon the stroots, alleys, or any public way or place within the city, tot the purpose of plckin.; up patients within the eltyl except in the foilawin-, circumatancesl 1, It shall not be unlawful for a person operating a transfer ambulance in the city, upon responding to s direct call for nonemergonoy tranutor ambulanco Eorvice, to operate such ambulance under omerguncy conditions, using emergenuy equipment, after notifying the fire ainrm dispatcher and requesting permission to make an emergency run, when a deter- mination is moan by the tranafor ambulance attunuallt that an el'.iergoncy, exiutu ruyuiritlg tl%u sick ar injured parson to be transported with all practical. cpoo<I to a hoaplitol. 2. It shall not be unlawful for any person operating a transfer ambulance in the city, who Is performing the secvico of maintaining an ambulance at a particular location for a spurting ev6nt, to operate such ambulance under emergency conditlona, using emergency equipment, actor notifying the fire alarm aispatcher and requesting permission to make an einergoncy run, wilon a determination le lmaue by the transfer ambulance attunclant that an emergency uxlats requiring the sick or injucea person to be transported with all practical speed to a hospital, PAGt: 1 ....-.vnvn!.. h.'..•r. ~.:e.1~M..~.;...~:~i~.5':"..S?•+'T.....+.i............ ...........~,«»..........r....~..-....~.....~-w.....w.....r 3. it shall not be unlawful for any person to operate an emergency ambulance to a hosp city, if the place of ppemergency at which the sick to outside the scityL imlto and uthe ambulance bmaking the emeryenoy run is licensed and operated in accordana,a with Article 43gbt V.T,C.S,f provided, chat the, operator first notlflea the fire alarm dispatcher of the route over which the emergency run will be made, 4. It shall not be unlawful for any person to operate a transfer ambulance in the city on an emergeisoy run when fire doNartment ambulances are not avail- able, and the tiro alarm dispatcher requests the operator to furnish back-up emergency ambulance service for the fire department, (b) Any aerson operating a transfer ambulance in the city who makas an emergency run under the provisions of subparagraph (1) or (2) above, shall within ton (10) days of each such emeryenoy run, submit to the director of public health, a report on a form provided by himr which shall describe the circum- stances requiring the emorgency run. Section 26-68. TRANSFER AMBULANCE REGULATIONS. (a) No porson sha11 operate or couue to be operated for patient pickup in the city any transfer ambulance without first having-complied with the following roquiromentsr 1, Each vehioie shall be supplied with a first aid kit and emergency equipment requirad by the Texas Department of Pobllo Health and approved by the local trauma committee of the American college of surgeons. 2, Each vehicle must to accompanied by two attendant/drivers who are currently certified by the State of Texas as emergency care attendants or emorganoy medical technicians, 3. 6afety awchAaien,s of the vehicle Host be operative and in good repair= including but not limited to headlights, taillighte, turn signals, brakes, beakelights, emergency lights, windshiold wipers, wiper blades, handles opening doors and windows, tiros and spare tiro. (b) No person shall operate or pormit the operation of a transfer ambulance on any emergency run or in response to any emergency call not with trio use of emergency lights anti stran, unless requested to do so by the fire alarm dispatcher in case of a major cotaatrophe. VAGG d •.«-•...~.y!'.'•!.^_t'hsr~.?ya~'.!cy' 4r::-•: . :•:r ;Y:r.. :L. "~-.•4n:c. .fir. .q5~ ~ r. r. r section 26.69. ATTENDANT/DRIVER'S REGULATIONS. (a) do person shall drive a transfar ambulance or act as an attendant of a transfer ambulance without first having complied with the following requirementsi 1. Each driver or attendant shall currently hold a valid Texas chauffeur's lloailse. 2. Each attendant shall currently be rogistored by the State of Texas as an emergency care attendant or emergency medical technician. 3. No driver or attendant shall have a r,)oord of final conviction of a felony or a crime involving use or possession of narool'ios' or operating a vehicle under the influence of drugs or Intoxicating liquor or driving while license has bean suspended within the five year period immediately preceding hie or her employment. Section 26-90. FALSC STATEMENT OF EMERUNCY. It shall be unlawful for any person to willfully inform the f•lra alarm dispatcher, police dispatchar or other fire or police official' that an ambulance or more than ono ambulance is needed at a location or address when such person knows that such statement is (0160. SECTIou rj. This ordinance shall becomo effective from anti after Its date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 19d3. RICHARD . a 5 , i 1 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTrSTi c'~t'ARFdr . E , r C l ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR.'13 C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATT01tkNGY CI:Y OF DENTON, TEXAS PACs; 5 CITY OF DTNTON, TEXAS OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM C,J. Taylor, Jr., City Attorney rr l~ cat's nuN+o'L-y Joe D. Morris, Assistant City Attorney ~C Robert B, Hunter, Assistant City Attorney w v ♦vvV DATEt January 14, 1983 JAN ~ A 1W T0i Charlotte Allen, City secretary 40 FROMr C. J. Taylor, Jr., City Attorney SUBJECTt Bingo Election Attached is art ordinance providing for a two percent (28) tax on bingo receipts if the election carries, You need to send the Attc.rney General and the Comptroller of Public Accounts a copy of the following: 1. Ordinance declaring the results of the election. 2. Map of the City of Denton, 3. Copy of the Two Percent Ordinance if you have any questions, please advise. / y C . TAM U , 111. CVTlJR t j s Attachment Not AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR A T10 PERCENT OROSS RECEIPTS TAX ON RECFIPT'S FROM THE CONDUCTING OF BINGO GAMES IN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. Cnapter 22 of the Code of the City of Dentons Texas is hereby amended b5' adding to Chapter 22 A new Article III reading as follower ARTICLE III BINGO GROSS RECEIPTS TAX Seotion 22-31. Bingo Gross Receipts Tax An annual Gross Receipts flax of two percent (29) on the gross receipts on the conducting of bingo games within the City of Denton, Texas is hereby levied and shall be collected from every person conducting bingo games in the city of Denton, Texas in aeoordanee with the provisions of Article 179d of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas. SF.CTjON Lt.. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of February, 1933. I HAR R , RUM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST I G A LOT MEW, IT SECRETARY CITY OF' DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DE:NTON, TEXAS ti~ - 1 , THIS 1$ YO CEPYIFY thol lh• rniuophaloprapho appootlnQ em Ihio illrn•I<110 fh+rfinr wllh CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET 02/01/89 and lndln wllh CITY COUNCII. AGENDA PACKET arr a1c4rah and templelo roproduclloni of Iho rocordo of (Company and Doplo).~~JTY TON " CITY SECRETARY .ac dollvorld In the roovlor cowrie of 4vilnorr for phol"rophlnp. h Is lurthor cortiflod Ihol lho rnkropholoprophlc prococm wets accomPllohed In a momma and on Alm which mNlr wilh mqulromonlo of lho Hollono! flurrwti of Slandardo fw "manoml micropholographic copy, PLAGfr ill YtOHNOWAY AT ( C..«+ 4►«na 61 A Maig~ftrk -&g Wig tanaton, Toast 76010 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY