HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-10-1983
NU'T '1Ck CAF stiUitf; SIiSSIUN - ItGGULt11c - S11L`CIAL Ca l.Lk1? - kytllkZGEi\CY ,~Igii'I1NG
011' TIM
OF -I'm
CITY OF DHN l'OcV, TEXAS,
NOtlco is hereby givan t2ttrt on the
day of 1.
the k C Q
City at llentoi, k'exity w HIngg se:L`s"`~ a , - ec ial
ailed emergency mee at o clad., mp in
the ~1a 0, ) of the r~unlc:lpal Elul ng ocated at
2lS `i;1st c~lct~~nne , enton exas. The subiacts to be considered are
listed on the Agenda which is attached horeto and make a part of this
notice.
If during the course of the meeting covored by this notice the
Board/Comm.ission should determine brat an executive meeting of the
Board/Commission, or it consultation with the City's attorney should
be held or is required, then such executive mooting or consultation
with tho City's attorney as authorized by Article 62SZ-17 Revised
Civil Statutes of 'T'exas will be held by the Board/Commission at the
dato, hour, and place given in this notice or as soon after the
commencement of the meeting cove, -.d by thl s notice as the
Board/Commission may convenietitly mecl.t in such executive meeting, or
consult witlt the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and
for any and all I)urposes permitted ',y Section 2(b) through Section
2(p), inclusive, of said Article 6252-17, including, but not limited
to:--- Soction 2(c), Sec:.(on 2(e) , Suction 2(£), Section 2(g}, and
Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda.
Should any final action, final decIs.ioIt , or
required in the opinion of the Board/Commission with £regardv tto c, be
any
matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation +;it}t the
City 'S attorney, 01011 such final action, final decision, or, final
vote shall be at either:
(a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the
reconvening of this public meeting, or
(b) at a subsequent public nice tino of the Board/Commission upon
notice thereof, as the Board/Commission shall determine.
Urt to i s y/L _ (la of
tlcls irtstrumertias~ filed , 1J ~W> the original of
amanb tit official records of the city of
1)entort, 'T'exas, and an original cop was posted on the bulletin board
in the main lobby of the Municipal Building of the City of Denton
at o'clock,. ui. on said date.
C lt1ltLu'l•'I'li ALLLcv, (.1''1 Y tSt C Kl-'TARY
CITY Uh l)CcV• ONO TEXAS
021it C
NO'1'1Cb OF (YORK SESSION r2- SPECIAL CALLED - Bj\1BllGSNCY 1\1EETING
OF THE OF THE
OF UENTON, ds f
G1LY
1 Notice is hereby given that,on the C day o Fe
city o.;, t he
19 of Denton, lexas w io a wor• session - regu ar special
called - emergency meet ng at ' o'clock, m., in '
the T g4-7ocatod at
= ' of t e Municipal Bui
215 ast c' nney, eslton; [ex s. 't'he subjects to be considered are
listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and make a part of this
notice.
If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the
Board/Commission should determine that an executive meeting of the
board/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should
be held or is required, then such executive meeting ov consultation
with the City's attorney as authorized by Article 6252-17 Revised
Civil Statutes of 'T'exas will be held by the Board/Commission at the
date, hour, and place given in this notice or as soon after the
commencement of the meeting covered by tills notice as the
Board/Commission may conveniently meet Ln such executive meeting, or
consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects vind
for and and all purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section
2(p), inclusive, of said Article 6252-17, including, but not limited
to,. Section 2(c), Section 2(e), Section 2(f), Section 2(g), and
Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda,
Should any final action, final decision, or final vote be
required in the opinion of the Board/Commission with regard to any
matter considered in such executive meeting or consultation with the
City's attorney, then such final action, final decision, or final
vote shall be at either;
(a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon the
reconvening of this public meeting, or
(b) at a notice thereof, asthe public Bomeetin of the ard/Commision shall Board/ Commission upon
n
On this day of 19 ~the original of
this instrument was filed among t e E,al records of the City of
Deboard
nton
Mlunicipal Baass uildingdofn thiee City of bulletin
Denton, E1 tile r main lobby of original
at o'clock, m, on said date.
I A LG?' h ALLEN, CI'I' SE(.RhTARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
U214C
. AGENDA
CITY OF DE)NTON CITY COUNCIL
May 10, 1983
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, May
10, at 500 P.M, in the Civil. Defense Room of the Municipal
Building at which the following items will be considered:
1. Discussion of the 1983 Citizen's Survey instrument.
2. Receive a report and consider Change Orders for the
Police Building renovation project.
3. Executive Sessions
A. Le al Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art, 6252-17
V. .17. S.
86 Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252!17 V.A,T.S.
D, Board Appo,itments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.,P.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of 'tenton City Council on Tuesday,
May 10, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building at which the following items will be considered:
7100 P.M.
11 Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
April 19, 1983.
2. Consent Agendas
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;
1. Bid # 9109 - Pecan Creek Dam
2. Bid # 9138 - Ranch Estates sanitary sewer
lines
City Council Agenda
May 10 r 1'983
Page,mwo
31 Bid # 9143 - Sprockets and chains
4. Bid # 9146 - Repair raw water pump
5. Purchase Order # 57644 to
Conley-Lott-Nichols in excess of $3,000.00
B, P.1ats i
1. Appproval of the final p lat of The Village -
Phase IV. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
2, Approval of the final plat of the Stone Hill
Subdivision. (`the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
3. Consider the request of the Kiwanis Club for
permission to hold a fireworks display at Fouts Field
on. July 4, 1983,
4. C,nsider the request of the Accelerated Christian
Kaucation conference for permission to hold a
fireworks display at Fouts Field on May 23, 1.983.
5. Public Hearings%
A. Z-1566. This is the petition or Homa Badie
requesting a change in zoning from multi-family
(MF-1) to the planned development (PD)
classification for office rise at 215 Bonnie Brae
Street. The property is more particvularl--
described as lot If Bonnie Brae Addition, and is
located along the west side of Bonnie Brae Street
beginning approximately 200 feet north of the
intersection of Bonnie Brae and West Oak. (T;ie
Planning and zoning commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from multi-family (MF-1) to the
planned development (PD) classification
for ofUce use at 215 Bonnie Brae
Street.
B. Z-1575. This is the petition of Tom Stingley
requesting a change in zoning from two-family
(2-F) to the planned development (PD)
classification on an 114520 square foot lot which
begins at the northwest corner of Bolivar and
Crescent. If approved, the planned development
(PD) would permit the division of the property
City Council Agenda
May 10, 1983
Page Three
into two (2) lots totaling 100'x60' and 60'x92',
respectively. A single family residential land
use is proposed for the 100'x60' lot that would
front on Crescent and an existing single family
residence would remain on the 601x92' lot at the
corner of Bolivar and Crescent. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning
from two-family (2-F) to the planned
development (PD) classification on an ilr 520
square foot lot which begins at the
northwest corner of Bolivar and Crescent.
6. Consider the petition of H. J. and Ann Minton
requesting a change in zoning from single family
(SF-7) to the office (0) classification on a 0.486
acre tract located at 1600 and 1608 Bernard Street and
702 Stemmons.
7. Ordinances:
• A. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time, and place for public hearings concerning
the proposed annexation of approximately 491.13
acres of land located along the south side of Ji.m
Christal Road and west of the existing city limit
line and authorizing the Mayor to publish a
notice thereof. (Z-1578)
8, Consider adoption of an ordinance pertaining to
water rates and charges.
8. Consider removing zoning Case No. Z-1565 from the
table.
9. Consider zoning change request in Zoning Case No.
Z-1565.
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from a specific use permit (5-151) for a
day care center to the two family (2-F;
classification on property located along the west
side of Stuart Road beginning approximately 1100
feet north of the intersection of Stuart Road and
Windsor Drive and being more particularly
described as lot 4, The Village - Phase t.
i (Z-1565)
City Coungil Agenda
May 10t'1983
Page dour
10. Consider removing Zoning Case No. Z-1569 from the table
ll. Consider zoning change request in Zoning Case No.
Z-1569
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from single family (SF-7) to the two
family (2--F) classification on property located
on the east side of Carroll boulevard north of
Fain street and being more particularly described
as lots 6 and 'l, block A, in the Richard A.
Harris Subdivision. (Z-1569)
12. Resolutions:
A. Consider adoption of a resolution in support of
religious freedom for all denominations.
B. Consider adoption of a resolution authorizing an
agreement between the City of Denton and the
Texas Municipal Power Agency regarding ownership
of electric facilities and improvements placed on
• City property by TMPA.
C. Consider adoption of a Resolution to create
Argyle Municipal Utility District (MUD).
13. Consider Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee
recommendation on electric rate study. (The Public
Utility Board recommends approval.)
14. Consider Change Order #3 of Contract C-48-1188-13
Hickory Creek Lift Station for Red R?.ver Construction
Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
15. Consider Change Order #13, C-48-1188-031 Wastewater
Treatment Plan., from Gracon Construction Company and
Freese and Nichols, Inc. (The Public Utility Board
recommends approval,)
16. Consider funding and purchase of the system Control
And Data Acquisition (SCADA) for the raw water pump
station and waiver plant. (The Public Utility Board
recommends approval.)
17. Consider contract with Ed Blaylock for a utility video
. slide proram. (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)'
1
City C09noil Agenda
May 101 1983
Page vivo
18. Consider participation in oversize (above 10"
diameter) of sanitary sewer line from State Hi hway
East 380 to Cooper reek Lift station serving Sandy
Hills Mobily Home subdivision and Capricorn Mobile
Home Park. (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
19. Consider increase coverage for boiler and machine
insurance.
20, Consider purchasing easements from Texas Municipa4
Power Agency (TMPA),
21, Consider approval of contracts for teaching Defensive
Driving course.
22. Consider amending the working capital vehicle
maintenance budget.
23. Consider nominations for officers and directors to the
North Central Texas Council of Government's 1983-84
Executive Board.
• 24. Official Action on Executive Session itemsi
A. Legal Matters
13. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
25. New Businesss
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
0797C
r _
NU'1'1Cks Ui won SusSlo~ - REGULAR - SHCtAL CALLIU Bti~I1RG6'NCX lfEis'T '1NG
U i' 't 1I ki OF THE
C ('1'Y OF 1)1;tr"1'U~V, ~f hXtAS,
1J Notice is hereby givarr than, o,A the
clay of
C i t y o of ll e n t.-----, e
s e hold -a
trop session - regu a - special
called emergencyme ing at _ ~,~a- o'czock, R - , in
the - f the Municipal Bui c ng ocated at
215 last Ale nney, a' a The subjects to be considered are
listed on the Agenda which is attached hereto and make a part of this
notice.
If during the course of the meeting covered by this notice the
Board/Commission should determine that an executive meeting of the
Board/Commission, or a consultation with the City's attorney should
be held or is required, them such executive meeting or consultation
wiLn the City's attorney as authorized by Article 6252.17 Revised
Civil Statutes of 'Texas will be held by the Board/Commission at the
date, hour, and pierce given in this notice or as soon after the
commencement of the ineet1rig covered by this notice as the
Board/Commission may conveniently meet in such exOcutlve meeting, or
consult with the City's attorney concerning any and all subjects and
for any and all purposes permitted by Section 2(b) through Section
2(p),-..inclusive, of said Article 6252-17, including, but not limited
to: --Section 2(c), Section 2(e), Section 2(f), Section 2(gand
Section 2(j) and as marked in the attached Agenda.
Should any final action, final OccISion, or final vote be
required in the opinion of the Board/Commission with regaird to any
matter considered in such executive nu;uting or consultation with the
City's attorney, than such final action, final decision, or- final
vote; shall be at either:
(a) the public meeting covered by this notice upon tfie
reconvening of this public meeting, or
lb) at a subsequent public, meeting or the Board/Commission upon
notice thereof, as the Board/Commission shall determine.
On this (lay of
' _ l1
f-) sy-, the original of
this instrument was filed a:ionb tie oEficial records of the City of
Denton, 'Texas, and an original cop, wars posted on the bulletin b
ard
in the main lobby of the Municipal Handing of the City •oE Denton
at -_~y'~ o'clock, --'-'-iii, on said elate.
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF DiiN'1'UN, TEXAS
U21dC
AGENDA ADDENDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
May 10, 1983
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
May 10, 1983, at 7;00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at which the
following item of business will be considered,
1. Consider approval of the request by the Accelerated
Christian Academy to hang a sign over Carroll Boulevard.
r
AGBDA ADD1iNDUM
CITY 01' DI NTON CITY COUNCIL
Dray 10, 1.083
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City COlnlcil oil Tuesday,
May 10; 1983) at 7;00 p.m. III the Council Chambers at which tll,:
following item of business will he considered,
Consider approvn] of the request by the Accelerated
Christian Academy to hang a sign over Carroll Boulevard.
AGUNDA
CITY UP DENTON CITY COUNC114
May 10, 1983
Work t;ession of the City of Denton City Council on `T'uesday, May
10, at 5330 P.M. in the Civil Uefense Room of the Municipal
Building at which the following items will be consideredt
1. Discussion of the 1983 Citizen's Survey instrument,
2. Receive a report and consider Change Orders for the
Police Building renovation project.
3. Executive Sessions
A. Legal %,Lters Under sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
s, Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V. A.7'. S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
U, hoard Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V. A.'1'. S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
May 10, at 7-.00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building at which the following items will be consideredt
7300 P.m.
1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
April 19, 1983.
2. Consent Agendas
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase 0rderss
1. bid # 9109 - Pecan Creek Dam
2. Bid 11 9138 - Ranch Estates sanitary sewer
lines
City Council Agenda
May 10, 1983
Page Two
3. Bid # 9143 - Sproc)sets and chains
4. Bid # 91.46 - [repair raw water pump
5. Purchase Order # 57644 to
Conley-Lott-Nichols in excess of $3,000.00
B. Plats:
1. Appproval of the final p lat of The, Village -
Phase iv. (The Planning ad zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
2. Approval of the final plat of the Stone Hill
Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
3. Consider the request of th,: Kiwatl13 Club for
permission to hole a fireworks uispl.ay at. Fouts Field
on July 4, 1983.
4. Consider the request of the Accelerated Christian
boucation conference for permission to hold a
fireworks display at Fouts Field on May 23, 1983.
5. Public Bearings:
A. Z-1566. ibis is the petition of Boma Badie
requesting a change in coning from multi-family
(iiF-1) to the planned development (PD)
classification for office use at 215 Bonnie Brae
Street. The property is more partiovularly
described as lot 1, Bonnie Brae Addition, and is
located along the west side of Bonnie Brae Street
beginning approximately 200 feet north of the
intersection of Bonnie Brae and West Oak. (The
Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from multi-family (Mir'-1) to the
planned development (PD) classification
for office use at 215 Bonnie Brae
Street.
B. Z-1575. This is the petition of Tom Stingley
requesting a change in zoning from two-family
(2-F) to the planned development (PD)
classification on an 11, 520 square foot lot which
begins at the northwest corner of Bolivar and
Crescent. If approved, the planned development
(PD) would permit the division of the property
- -
City Council Agenda
May i0, 1963
Page 11hr.ee
into two (2) lots totaling 100'x60' and 60'x92',
respectively. A single family residential land
use is proposed for the 1001x60' lot that would
front on Crescent and an existing single family
residence would remain on the 60'x92' lot at tht:
Oorner of boiivar and Crescent. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning
from two-family (2-F) to the planned
oevelopi{tent (PD) classificat.ion on an 11, 520
square foot lot which begins at tale
northwest corner of Bolivar and Crescent.
6. Consider the petition of N. J, and Ann Minton
requesting a change in zoning from sincjIu family
(SF-7) to the oft ice (0) classification on a 0,466
acre tract 1oc,ated at 1600 and 1608 Bernard Street ar„i
702 Stemmons.
7. OrdinancesI
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time, and place for public hearings concerning
the proposed annexation of approximately 491.13
acres of land located along the south side of Jin,
Christal Road and west of the existing ci~y limit
line and authorizing the Mayor to publish a
notice thereof. (Z-1578)
D. Consider aaoption of an ordinance pertaining to
water rates and charges.
13. Consider removing zoning Case No. Z-:1565 from the
table.
9. Consider zoning change request in Zoning Case No.
2-1565.
A. Consider adoption of art ordinance changing ttie
zoning from a sti.eQitic use permit (5-151) for a
day care cenker to the two family (2-F)
classification on property located along the west
side of lituart Road beginning approximately 1100
feet north of tl,,~ intersection of Stuart. Road and
Windsor Drive and being more particularly
described as lot 41 The Vil:iage Phase 1.
(Z-1565)
City CULII'Xil Agenda
May 10, 1983
Page Four
10, Consider removing Zoning Case No. Z-1569 from the table
11. Consider zoning change request in Coning Case No.
Z-15b9.
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from single family (Si-'-7) to the two
t•am ily (2-P') classification on property located
un the east side of Carroll Boulevard north of
!Fain Street and being more particularly described
as lots 6 and 7, block A, in the Richard A.
Uarris Subdivision. (Z-1569)
i2. Re so Iutionsr
A. Consider adoption of a resolution in support Of
religious treedom for all denominations.
13. Consider adoption of a resolution authorizing an
ayreement between the City of UenL•on and the
Texas Municipal Power i~gency regarding ownership
of electric facilities and improvements placed or.
City property by TMIIA.
C. Consider adoption of a Resolution to create
Argyle runicipal Utility District (MUD).
13. Consider Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee
recommendation on electric rate study. (The Public
Utility Board recommends approval.)
14. Consider Change Order 03 of Contract C-48-1188-13
Hickory Creek Litt Station for Red River Construction
Company. (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval..)
15. Consider Change Order #13, C-48-1188-03, Wastewater
Treatment Plant, from Gracon Construction Company and
Freese and Nichols, Inc. (The Public Utility Board
recommends approval.)
16. Consider funding and purchase of the System Control
And Data AcgLII'SitiOll (SCADA) for the raw water pump
station and water plant. (The Public Utility Board
recommends approval.)
17. Consider contract with Ed Blaylock for a utility video
slide program, (The Public Utility Board recommenaa
approval.)
I
City Council Agenda
May 10, 1983
Page Five
18. Consider participation in oversize (above 10"
diameter) of sanitary sewer line from State Highway
Last 380 to Cooper Creek Lift Station serving Sandy
Hills Mobile Howe Subdivision and Capricorn Mobile
Home Park. (The Public Utility board recommends
approval.)
19. Consider increase coverage for boiler and machine
insurance.
20. Consider purchasing easements from Texas Mu nicipaI
Power Agency (TbIPA) .
21. Consider approval of contracts for teaching Defensive
Driving course.
22. Consider amending the working capital vehicie
maintenance budget,
23. Consider nominations for officers anti directors to the
North Central Texas Council of Government's 1983-84
Executive Board.
24. Ufficial Action on Executive Session items:
A. Legal ;Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. hoard Appointments
25. New Business:
This item proviues a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
07970
l,.
CITY OF DHNTON
MEMORANDUM
TO; Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATh May 4, 1983
SUBJECT; 1983 Citizens Survey
Jim Glass has subrnittod a draft of the survr
instrument for tho 1983 Citizens Survey. T110 Staff will revi ve
the draft on 'T'hursday, May 5. Ile will subm: t i t to you pr i : r
to the 5;30 work session on Tuesday.
Following your suggestions, Jim has drafted a questi:n
referring to tho past voting behavior of peopla responding
the survey. It will then bo possible to ascertain if peop.:
who voted respond differently than people who did not vote,
After receiving input from Staff and Council, we wi:l
roturn the instrument to Jim so that he can begin the survey.
i
T' Chris 1-fa,rtUng
ca
08000
CITY OF DUTON
MORAN D UM
TO, Rick Svchla, Assistant City Manager
FRO;I; Bill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant
DATE : May 3, 1983
SUBJECT; Status Report on police Building Renovation project
As you know, we have been working for some time in an attempt to determine our
financial position relative to the Police Building Renovation Project, Due to
the cancellation of the original contract with Taylor Hall, lne. and the subs''quetnt
take over of the project by the City of Denton it has been very difficult to
I evaluate our position relative to the original budget estimates until recentl,..
r The original budget for this project wns $1,089,000, It appears that the project
will run over budget by approximately $43,269,38 for a total project cost of
$1,132,269.38, The actual cost over runs for this project are estimated at
$58,299,33; however, we will experience approxirintely $15,020.00 in cost savings
from the various project elements,
. have attached for your review a specific listing of all cost over runs relative
to this project. Basically, these over runs can be broken down into thrrae specific
categories which include: Items Not Included in Taylor Halls' Original Budget;
Change Order initiated by the City and Unanticipated Expenses.
rltt estimated $23,799.67 of the over runs have occurred due to the inability o: a
Taylor HalL to accurately budget for several of the individual project elements.
Approximately S14,139.42 of the over runs have resulted from Change Orders initiated
by the City due to Code requirements, energy conservation, projf'Ct security ar.d
anticipated grOSJtII. An estimated $20,359.29 of the uvur runs have occurred ice to
unanticipated expenses which include such items as theft of steeL, tool repair,
and contract payments to Taylor Hall resulting from the termination of the original
contract.
Although there have been some problems with the financial administration of the
project, the actual construction work is proceeding very smoothly, At the present
time, the job is slightly ahead of the construction time table established by Taylor
Hall, Inc, inspite of the delays and confusion created by the termination of the
Taylor Hall contract. We are estimating completion of tie project by September L,
1983 which is approximately two weeks ahead of the established schedule
Should you have a m, conm onts or questions on C~iatt ase let me know.
Bill Angelo
Atta.hments
BA/bp
Police Building Renovation Project
Listing of Cost Overruns and Savingu
i, Items Not Included in Taylor Hall's Budget
a. Quality Tests $462,00
b. Ymolition 735,00
c. Sidewalks 642,00
d. Grade Sand 104.00
e, Concrete Accessories $1,536.72
f. Form Seal 141,36
g. Visqueen 1308
h, Light Weight Block 2,187,58
K Masonry 10.000,00
j. Dimension Lumber 088,93
k, B/R Class 1,000,00
1. Hollow Metal Frames 1,000.00
m, Accoustical ceiling 950,00
n, Steel Erection 1,438,25
o, 14orkmuns' Compensation Ins. 2,944,85
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,799.67
[I. Change Orders Requested by City
a. Rebuild Front Doors $1,000.00 (Job Condition)
b, Reroute Plumbing 300,00 (Job Condition)
c. Add Fire Dampers 545.00 (Job Condition)
d. Steal Beam @ Vault 191.00 (Job Condition)
e. Fence Rental 516,26 (Security/Safety)
f. York Air Modulator 4,245,00 (Energy Conservation)
g. 11YAC Fan i!6 2,654,00 (Energy Conservation)
h, HVAC Consultant 297.60 (Energy Conservation)
i, Extra Conduit 857,00 (Future need)
j. Relocate Electric Service 1,700.00 (Job Condition)
k. Subcontractor Bonds 1,120.00 (City Protection)
1. C:iC Insurance 713.56 (City Protection)
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14A39.42
111. Unanticipetted Expensus
a. Theft of steel $352,82
b, Toot Repair 106,75
e. Payments to Taylor hall per Contract 19,890.'12
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,350.29
1V. Actual & Expected Savings
a. Trash haul $1,000.00
b. Clean up 1,000.00
C. Retaining walls 2,000,00
d. Termiting l7U,l~
e, uightweight concrete L,000.00
f. Non-shrink grout L00 00
g. Curing Compound 100.00
h, insulation 1,000.00
i. Rough hardware 1,000.00
j, pneumatic tubes 2,650.00
k. Plumbing credit
1, parking lot 5,000.00
TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . 515,020.00
V. Estimated Total Overrun
Estimated Cost Overruns 558,289.38
Estimated Savings " L5,020.00
Estimated Total Overrun $43,269,38
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO; Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Dill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant
DATE; May 3, 1983
SUBJECT: Change Orders for Police Building Renovation Project
As you know we have recently received two requests for Change Orders for the
Police Building Renovation Project, The first request originated from the Chit:
of Police and relates to the southwest stairway in the building, The second
request originates from a number of the Historic Landmark Coiwnission and involves
the snap-in window grids, I have included for your review a brief explanation
and cost estimate for each of these request,
Change Order #12 - Redesign Stairway
This Change Order would call for a redesign of tho -n&hwoo stairway which as
presently designed is only 42 inches in width, The Police Department feels that a
wider stairway is necessary since this stairway leads from the street to the squad
room and the officers will be carrying briefcases and shotguns both up and down
this stair. The existing, width will not allow for officers to pass one another on
the stairway and would probably result in constant damage to the stairway wal L and
the Police weapons and equipment.
To eliminate this problem the Project architects have suggested turning the srsi.r,ay
to the south and extending it to the southwestern edge of the building, This plan
would allow for greater width and would not negatively effect the exterior appearance
of the building,
Total cost of this Change order would be approximately $16,197,50,
Change Order #13 - Exterior Window Grids
This Change Order was initiated by a member of the Historic Landmark Commission and
involves the installation of outside snap-in window grids, in order to preserve
the historical integrity of the building's appearance the City plans to install
snap-in window grids on the interior side of each window. Some members of the
Historic Landmark Commission feel that the glare caused by the sun will not aitow
the interior grids to be seen at all times; therefore, they have requested thug
the City install exterior window grids.
Total cost, of this Change order would be approximately $4,015.00.
Chance orders
May 3, 1983
Pago 2
Change Order X112 - Redesign of Southwest Stairway
Redesign of Southwest Stairway appears to be a very pt•actical and necessary request,
If additional funding is made available, I would recommend that this Change order
be approved for safety and future cost saving raitsolls,
Change Order 113 - Exterior Window Grids
Exterior Window Grids does not appear to be very prru:ti 1 in 1Lglat of the
architects report and written comments we have received from the manufacturer of
these grids, In essence, both the architect and the manufacturer believe that
these grids would not hold up when exposed to the natural elements as they are
designed and manufactured for interior use only. In addition, the glare problem
only occurs on the west side of the building during the late morning; hours and does
not seem to be a real problem. We also plan to install black mesh window screens
identical to those on the original building which should help to reduce the sunlight
glare, Therefore, I would recommend against this Change Order,
If you have any questions or comments on this matter, pLease let me know,
Bill Angelo
Attachment; Letter from Gerald Stone
Letter from Marvin Windows
BA/bp
I
THE ARCHITECTURAL COLLECTIVE INC.
April 15, 1983
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
ATT: Bill Angelo
Dear Bill:
Enclosed you will find a copy of Marvin Window Company's
reply to my inquiry as to the advisablility of using their
standard wood snap-in-grids on the exterior of the Police
Department Remodel Project. As you will notice, they do
not recommend that we use their product for an exterior
application, and will not guarantee same against warping,
falling apart or rusting clips,
It is contrary to our professional practice to go against
the recommendations of the manufacturer. If you elect to
use the grids the city will be responsible and I will need
a written confirmation to initiate the work,
If you decide to pursue this route, the cost will be
approximately $4,015 to cover painting, trimming, fitting,
and installation.
Also bear in mind that we have screens that will cover
the windows and should cut down on the glare and defuse the
sun's reflection.
Yourrs~ truly,
Russell L, Bates
GERALD E. STONE, A.I.A. ARCHITECT
RUSSELL L. BATES ARCHITECT
308 N. CARROLL DEN rON, TEXAS 76202-1985 (817)387-1r' S 1
Matra Phone 214/280-7464
~~,,r~ Local Phone 214/381.1386
do 111~ &444
10928 Shady Trail
Dallas, Texas 7$220
3 /21~ /83
The Arohtnotual colleotive
1', 0, Box 1985
Denton 'rexas 76201
Russeli Rater
Dear Russell,
Concerning; your questions about the rectiingular grids
for the police station windows. X have talked with our fao-
tory representative and they do not offer o exterior glue
on these p,rtds. They also say they have sold the grids for
exterior use,•-but they will not warranty against any orob-
lem.so (i,e, Warping„ Falling, Apart, and gusting: c:lips), They
also say they have sold them in othor instances, however
nothing has been reported one way or the other, good or bad.
They also say that there might have to be a slight modifi-
cation In the sizo of the grids to make them fit, but this
would be a minor ,job.
Concerning, the costs for the rectangular grids on these
windows, below is a list of the per, each grid and total cost
delivered to the ,jobsita.
D- 8 Sets Rectangular Grids 115,56 364,48
E-10 Sets Rectangular Grids 31.62 316,20
P-31 Sets Rectangular Grids 46,02 1426,62
G- 2 Sets Rectangular Grids L16.12 92.24
Ft- 1 Set Rectangular Grids 15.93 15,R3
2.215.37
Thank You,
Nva"
Michael Day
Sales Re ,resentat•, ive
.
CIVY COUNCIL MINUTES
April 19, 1981
The Council convened Into n work session at 5130 p,m. In the
Defense Room of the Municipal Building,
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro Tam Stephens, Council .He..aber
Barton, Hopkins, Alford, Riddlespergorl City Maaa.her,
City Attorney, and City Secretary
ABSENT: Council Member Chew
1. The Council considered initiation of annexation procaa,t:ngs
on a proposed 2$8,5 acre residential subdivision consisting 50
lots, located along the south side of Jim Christal Road and an the
west side of dickory Crook,
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported to the Council tKa : the
area under consideration for annexation is a proposed residj:rtial
site. The area is located one milo northwest of the north +mu of
the runway at Denton Municipal Airport, Watkins stated that of had
contacted Chuck Hale of the Federal Aviation Administration amt had
received a noise contour map of the area. The property under
consideration is in zono A with a noise rating of 0 to 917 An
additional parallel runway in the future would extend the n,atse
contour, Watkins reported that the developers intonclon is t,) n,,ild
streets to County specifications, the subdivision standards i:: the
extra territorial jurisdiction would unsure that the devu.rpers
build to City standards, If annexed, the area would InitiiL. be
zoneo agricultural, The proposed development of ranch-type -!s:ntes
would be appropriate under O is agricultural zoning, Watkins >:wted
that under state statutes, r, city can zone an area near a mun.:;pal
airport even if it is not within the city limits,
Mayor Stewart asked if developers can build residences in in nrea
zoned Light Industrial or Agricultural under the City's ring
ordinance,
Watkins replied that the two classifications of zoning ,hich
restrict residential building are Heavy Industrial and B:j,nned
Development,
Mayor Stewart stated that porhr;ps a letter should be sent the
developers stating the problems that the City had with resiuential
developments near the airport,
Council Member Hopkins stated that the developers could build :n the
property using the ranch estates category of zoning,
Watkins reported that taking into account the property whi•:r had
already been annexed this year, an additional ton square miles :ould
still be brought into the city limits, the area in question would
be only one square mile,
Council Member Hopkins replied that he was in favor of the opr,,an of
zoning the area around the airport and not annexing.
City Manager Hartung reported that the Council may want to consider
annexing the two tracts in auestIon and also proceed wi:1, the
airport zoning. The Council r,.ould stop annexation proceodin.is if
they so desired,
Council Member Riddlesperger stated this procedure would aler," :hose
considering future construction within the extra terri:orial
jurisdiction that the City could annex the property to :;;sure
orderly development.
City ?tanager Hartung stated that with the proposed extension :i Loop
208 and the Hickory Crook sewer line the areas outside of :h: City
limits are developing very rapidly. Hartung recommended t;.it the
Council initiate annexation procedures, proceed with the i:rport
zoning, and review with the Planning and Zoning Commis st,:.. the
City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 19, 1983
Page Two
routing of the sewer line and the proposed Coop 288 to detaew.ne
which areas would warrant consideration for future annexation,
Riddlosperger motion, Hopkins second to Initiate annext:on
proc-oodinss with the understanding the proceedings could coast ii
the airport toning statute is used, Motiou carried unanimously.
Council Member Chow arrived,
2. 'rho Council discussed the Alexander Grant Management Rd,-.7t.
Bill McNary, Director of Finance, stated that in lig8lit of the r.ct
that he was leaving, he would like to make a few $to oments, Mc a4ry
reported that for the first time a financial statemant was pro,r•oed
to the Council which was unqualified, The first year, Aiax.►raer
Grant did not did make any statements regarding the internal c.E::-o1
in the utility bill system, There were no comments in the r,;,:rt
regarding any Internal control problems, McNary then highliT::ed
several areas of the report.
City Mating ar Hartung stated that the Staff was attemptini :o
streamline the utility billing system In order to mail correct ::ls
in a timely manner, The City is in the process of locating e31
maters and cross referencing to the Installation list to be sure
they correspond,
Me Vary added the Staff was evaluating whether an internal Cella-::;un
Department would be necessary,
The Council convened into an hxecutive Session to discuss rFal
matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. Vo
official action was taken.
The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 .,i he
Council Chambers,
PkESENT; Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro TOM Stephens, Council 14taDer
Barton, Ho)kins1 Alford, Riddlesperger, and Chew; :ity
Manager, C ty Attorney, and City Secretary
ABSENT; None
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes ac :he
Regular Meeting of April 5, 1983.
Riddlesperger motion, Chow second to approve the MInu tis as
presented, Motion carried unanimously.
2, Consent Agenda
A, Bids and Purchase Orders:
1, bid 1 9134 - Ammonia tank and anhydrous ammonia
2. Bid 1 9135 - Lease/purchase of equipment
3, hid 1 9137 - Carpet and installation
4. Bid r 9139 - Turf fertilizer
5, Bid 4 9140 Miscellaneous water supplies
6. Bid 4 9141 Compound meters with flanges
7. Bid 9 9144 - Rebuild Pump
3. 1tid 4 9145 Repair parts i'or electric turbine
City council Minutes
Meeting of April 19, 1983
Page Throe
D. Plats and Roplats;
1. Approval of the final plat of the ,lamco Addt_:,~n.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission roeoinaa,nas
approval.)
2. Approval of the final plat of lots l and 2, :•.ock
As Guy Laney Addltion. (The Planning and t,,ng
Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of the final replat of lots 3, 4 amt
block Is M IIsido Addltion, The planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval).
Council Member Hopkins asked that Item 2,A.3 (Bid r 9137 for :irpet
and installation) be removed from the Consent Agenda.
Hopkins motion, Chow second to approve the Consent Agenda wita ,he
exception of item 2.A.3. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Itopkins asked why the lowest bid for item 2.A.i, was
not being used,
John Marshall, Purchasing Agent, responded that tho the lowest hid
did not meet specifications and that both bids in the package wtra
alternate bids. 1
Council Member Hopkins asked who had measured the yardage.
,orshall answered that the bidders and the Staff had both ineai-+,red
tie yardage, The bids were evaluated by the highest estimate is as
riot to exceed the prie.o In the bids,
Hopkins motion, Alford second to approve item 1.A.3 for carpi: and
installation. Motion carried unanimously.
3. the Council considered approval of a contract for S doo
for Human Services study. (The Human Resources Committee reco-a:aends
approval.)
Mayor Stewart asked what was the purpose of the study,
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that the contract would
furnish the Council with lnformation on what services are :ring
provided by those agencies which the City helps to fund and ilia the
quality of the services provided, It had been six years sin,:_ the
last study was completed and updated information was needa-t on
possible gaps in services and also to establish critoria for ar;ia1
services.
Council Member Riddlosperger commented that the study would he -1 the
Council to see how efficiently services are being delivered the
agencies that the City funds.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the last survey information mi. out
of date.
Council Member Rikid Ies perger responded that the Council shout: ,.now
what the people want and need and if the City is sponding .:ney
wisely on services which are now being offered.
Chow motion, Riddlesperger second to approve the contract. .ion
carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 19, 1985
Page Four
4. Public Hearings
A. Z•1569. The Council considered the petition of John
Narsutis requesting a change in zoning from single family (SP-7) to
the two family (2•F) classification on pproperty located on the east
side of Carroll Boulevard north of Fain Street. The property is
more particularly described as lots 6 and 7, block Al to the Richara
A. Harris Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commisst->n
recommends approval.)
The Mayor opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. John Varsutis spoke In favor of the petition stating that tc,e
Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval, xr.
Varsutis also stated that a nursing home facility is across the
street from the proposed development and the change in zoning fraa
singgle family to two fa>niIy classification would allow for
duploxos. Mr. Varsutis reported that persons who have someone in
the nursing home could tsKe advantage is this type of housing an:,
thae there are several non-conforming uses In the neighborhood. !tr.
Narsutis also reported that the property was subdivided in 1949 and
that single member dwellings are no longer being constructed In tlss
area. There are frame homes In the area and the proposed brick
structures would be an asset.
Mr. Lloyd Green, area resident, spoke in opposition. Mr. Green
stated that he had lived in the area for 12 years and tins
representing other neighbors who were mostly senior citizens. kr.
Green handed out a petition to the Council. Mr. Green stated teat
the neighbors felt that duplexes were not needed lit this kind f
neighborhood. Mr, Green also stated that he had tried to buy this
particular property in the early 1950's and had made another offer
on the property 120 days ago.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if most of the people in t';tirs
neighborhood own their own homes.
Mr, Green replied yes, but not everyone had been in the neighbornood
as long as he had, %lost of the neighbors were older persons.
Council Member Alford asked if there was other rental property in
the area.
Mr. Green replied that there was some rent property on Deni>on
Street.
Council Member Hopkins asked if till of the persons who had sited
the petition lived In this particular area.
Mr. Green replied yes.
The Mayor turned the floor back to the pro side for rebuttal.
Mr. ,Narsutis stated that there were not all single family dwelli.:gs
in the neighborhood and that there was roatul property. '.cis
particular property had never had any construction on it. There are
many duplexes in the area and that lie believed this development
would be an asset to Denton.
Council Member Barton asked if Mr, Varsutis had any reason to
believe that the persons who would rent the duplexes would not ,eip
the residents of the nursing home.
Narsutis responded that he believed the location would attrac-, a
certain type of renter who would be sympathetic to the older
neighbors and the residents of the home.
City Council Minutes
Meetingg of April 19, 1983
Page Flve
Council Member Riddlospergor asked Mr. Narsutis If 'ie would 00
opposed to selling these Lots now if Mr. Green and his group wanted
to buy them.
Dir. Narsutis answered that he wanted to build the duplexes to make
money renting them out. He and his contractor had built similar
duplexes in Pilot Point and Aubrey and were not in the land sales
business.
The Mayor ctosed the Public Hearing.
Charlie Watkins of the Staff reported that 20 reply forms had been
mailed out with nine returned in opposition and one returned in
favor. Of the twenty notices mailed, approximately six did not lire
in the area. Watkins also stated that there are several duplexes is
the area, The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the proposal
was not inconsistent with the character of this area and recommenced
approval by a vote of six to one.
1. Ti,9 Council considered adoption of an ordinance
changging the zoning from single family (SF-7) to the two family
(2-F) classificacion on property located on the east side of Carroll
Boulevard north of Fain Street.
'rho following ordinance was presented;
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY uF DENTQkh,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE So.
69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO CITY LOTS 6 & 7) BLOCK A
OF THE RICHARD A. HARRIS SUBDIVISION; AND MURK PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to table. On roil call cote
Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion to table
carried unanimously. Council Members Barton and Hopkins stated for
the record that they were in favor of the zoning.
B. Z-1570. The Council considered the the petition, of
the City of Denton requesting a change in zoning from two family
(24) to the planned devolopment (PD) classification for office iu)
use on an approximately 25,000 square foot lot located at 114
Parkway (city lot 15, block 431) on the northeast corner of Parkway
and Carroll Boulevard. (The Planning and Zoniug Commission
recommends approval.)
The Mayor opened the Public Hearing.
Charlie Wal:0.ns of the Staff stated that this petition was generated
by the City of Uonton. The Chamber of Commerce building is located
on this property and the area is zoned for two family dwellings.
The City owns the property and would like to legitimize the zoning.
'rho Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with the
condition that the portable advertising sign be allowed to remain on
the property.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked why the Chamber needed the sign
and how was it decided who could and could not advertise on the sign.
Chuck Carpenter of the Chamber of Commerce responded that my
charitable, non-profit organizations can advertise on the sign.
Council Member Riddlesperger questioned why the Chamber needed a
portable sign.
City Council Minutos
Meeting of April 19, 1983
Page Six
Council Member Chew suggested that the Chamber put up a perin,t,nent
sign such as the one at the Civic Center.
The Mayor closed the Public Hearing,
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordi:i.snce
changing the zoning from two family (Z-F) to the planned dovelopaient
(PD) classification for office (0) use on an approximately :i.O00
square foot lot located at 413 Parkway.
The following ordinance was prosentedi
NO. 83.43
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DEXTO N,
TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX 1'O THE 000,I OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCA so.
69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES 'r0 CITY LOT 15, BLOCK 431;
AND MORE PAR'PICDLARLY DESCRIBED IiBREIN; AND DBCLARC4A~ AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
Alford motion, Chew second to adopt with ordinance withour, the
condition of leaving the portable sign so as to comply with the :ity
of Denton sign ordinance. Barton motion, Hopkins second to i,allend
the main motion to allow the portable sign as writ -ton in the
presented ordinance. Barton "aye", Hopkins "aya", Stephens "z.ell ,
Alford "nay", Riddlesperger "nay", Chew "nay", and Mayor ",i,s,•
Motion failed 4 to 3. On roll call vote on the main motion d,1:-ton
"aye", Hopkins "aye" Stephens "aye", Alford "aye", Riddlesp.trfer
aye , Chew "aye", anil Mayor "aye", Main motion carried unanlmou:fr.%,
(Explanatory Note; Although the matter as presented to the :itv
Council was for Planned Development (PD) zoning classification for
office use, the ordinance in fact passed by the City Colunc3I
provides for office (O) zoning classification which war in
accordance with the In ton t of the City Council.)
C. Z-1S71. The Council considered the petition of 1. A.
Ayers representing Dimension Development Company requesting an
amendment to planned development (PD-28). If approved, the
amendment would permit the development of 404 multi-family uni~:s on
13.146 acres presently designated for office-warahouse-show,' t.om,
mini warehouses and a local sttnst. The property encompasses the
southeast portion of planned development (PD-Z8) between 1.3511 and
proposed Colorado Boulevard. (TLo Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
The Mayor opened the Public Hearing,
Mr. Bill Ayers, petltionor, spoke in favor stating that apaerm-ents
in this location would be appropriate,
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the Public Hearing,
Charlie Watkins of the Staff reported that four reply forms had teen
mailed, 1 was returned In favor and none in opposition. I•his area
is high intensity and the Planning and 'Zoning Commission felt :hat
apartments would be consistent with the preseot land use.
1. The Council considered adopt Io,i of an Ord Li.ance
amending planned development (PD-28) to permit the devolopmea: of
404 multi family units on 13.146 acres located Between I.3i.i and
proposed Colorado Boulevard,
l'he following ordinance was presented,,
City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 19, 1981
Page Seven
NO. 83.44
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTUN',
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO 'rHB CODE OF
ORDI• NANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69.1, AND AS SAIL) MAP APPLIES rO APPROXIMATELY 13.149 ACRES
OF LAND, MORE OR LESS OUT OF THE DANIEL LAMBERT SURVEY,
ABSTRACT N0. 784 AND T6 JOim MCGOWEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0.
797; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Hopkins motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance, On roll
call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "ayo", and Mayor "aye", Motion carried
unanimously.
D, L-1573, 'rho Council considered the ppetition of George
liepkins requesting a change In zoning from the planned development
(P -IS) classification for a private utility shop to the commercial
(C) classification on an eight (8) acre tract located at the
northwest corner of spencer Road and Loop 288. (Tho Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
The Mayor opened the Public Hearing,
Mr. George Hopkins, representing the Denton County Electric
Cooperative, spoke In favor of the petition stating that the Co•Op
purchased the property for a now facility and now has excess
property, The proposed use is consistent with the area. 'Cho Co-Op
will keep a portion of the property for their now facility.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the Public Hearing,
Charlie Watkins reported that nine reply forms were mailed with Ic,rLe
being returned in favor and one being returned In opposition. The
Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the commercial zoning was
consistent and recommended approval.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
changing the zoning from the planned development (PD-15)
classification for a private utility shop to the commercial iC)
classification on an eight (8) acre tract located at the northwest
corner of Spencer Rood and Loop 188,
The following ordinance was presented;
NO, 83.45
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DEN'TON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDI- NANCES OF 'rHE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE .NO,
69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROX01ACELY 8,000 ACRES
OF LAND, MORE OR LBSS, OUT OF THE M1, AUSTIN SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 4; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AN'D
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DA'Z'E,
Hopkins motion, Alford second to adopt the motion. On roll call
vote Barton "aye", Ilopkins "a~e", Stephens "aye", Alto rd "aye",
Riddlespr,rger "aye", Chew "aye', and Mayor "aye". Motion carried
unanimously.
51 Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance to
quitclaim an alley In block 1 of Fulton and Spaulding Railroad
Addition. 1V-49) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
City Council Minutes
Meoting of April 19, 1983
Page Hight
Charlie Watkins of the Staff reported to the Council that the item
was approved by the Council on April 5 and this was the ordinacce
aithorizing the quitclaim.
Tito following ordinance was presented;
NO. 83.46
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF AN .-U- E1,
WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYI'n 40
HUCUTE A QUITCLAIM USED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE ATD
INTBRHST OF THE CITY IN SAID ALLEY TO THE OWNER OF 7E
'TRACT OF LAND CONVEYHD BY SAIL' EASEMENT; AND DECLARIsQ AN
HFPBCTIVE DA'Z'E,
Riddlesperger motion, Chow second to adopt the ordinance. On ;ell
call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford
Riddlosporgor "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye", Notion carried
unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance to
quitclaim an alley in block 2 of Fulton and Spaulding Railread
Addition, (Q-49) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recoa ends
approval.)
'rho folioOing ordinance was presented;
NO. 83.47
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF AN
WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON A,Q AUTHORIZING THE %AIQ.i TO
EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, Tiri. J\D
INTEREST OF TIIE CITY IN SAID ALLEY TO THE OWNER ~kF THE
TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY SAID EASEMENT; AND UHCL.kR iNO AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. v: ,,-;ail
call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "ayo", Stephens "aye", Alford -aye",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye", Motion tarried
unanimously.
C. rho Council considered adoption of an ordinance to
quitclaim a 0,0434 acre strip of right-of-way located along tae %est
side of 'Teasley Lane at the Intersection on Teaslev and
Londonderry, (Q-56) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recaanends
approval,)
Charlie Watkins of the Staff reported that this Item was tab'.,-:. at
the April 5 meeting until information regarding the right-of-..• on
Teasley Lane could be provided. Watkins reported that tha
right-of-way on Teasley is 90 feat, but as 'Teasley app;:1ches
Londonderry Lane, the right-of-way widens to 120 feet,
Council Momber Stephens thanked the Staff for the detalied
information.
The following ordinance was presented;
NO, 83.48
AN OR.UINANCE PROVIDING FOR '11IH ABANDON EN1' OF A POR-. OF
A TRACT OF LAND DEDICA'T'ED FOR UTILITY AND STREIiT RlCn: OF
WAY WITHIN THL CITY OF DH,VTON AND AUTHORIZING ]'HE NIA1,'K TO
EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, Tliii AND
INTHREST OF THE CITY IN SAID LAND TO 'F11L (ACM OF lh_ ;.,ACT
OF LAND CONVEYED BY SAID I, ASBhIENT AND DECLAR NJ AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
i
City Council Minutes
Mee tin of April 19, 1983
Page Nine
Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, On roll all
vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "a~e", Stephens "aye", Alford "ske",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye', and Mayor "aye", Motion cac-ied
unanimously,
6, Resolutions
A. The Council considered adoption of a resolution
supporting modification of Part D of the Clear Air Act.
Charlie Watkins of the Staff reported the approved resolution v.uld
be forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency in suppoc: of
the clean air act and to prevent sanctions from being used ags.:nst
area cities,
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that the NCTCOG Boar: of
Directors had discussed this issue. The devices which me.Lsure
pollution had been located such that the data obtained was
inaccurate and could cause sanctions upon area businesses.
The following resolution was presented;
R H S O L U T l O N
hHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, "rxas
supports the continuation of effective air quality standards; ia.t
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texa3 also
supports efforts to provide area citizens with transporaction
mobility and the opportunity to obtain economic objectives; N0'n',
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, 'I'LlkS:
SECTION I,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas sur orts
an appropriate balance among air quality, mobility, and ec:,nomic
objectives through the modification of the proposed United ::aces
Environmental Protect Ion Agency's Construction and Funding San,:Iions
(48 Federal Register 4972, "Compliance with the Statutory Prov.s
of Part D of the Clean Air Act," February 3, 1983),
SECTION II,
That a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded the
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, :.B'„
Washington, U. C. 20460
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of April, 1983
RICHARD U, SUMCART-,-TRVM
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE ALLE7N U SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY
City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 19, 1983
Page Tan
Riddlesperger motion, Barton second that the resolution be passed.
On roll call vote Barton aye , Hopkins aye , Stephens aye ,
Alford "ayu", Riddlesporger "aye", Chow "aye", and Mayor "aye".
Motion carried unanimously,
B. The Council considered adoption of a resolution
recommending incresss instate transportation funding to urban areas,
City Manager Hartung stated that a need exists for additional funds
to maintain streets and highways. The resolution would offer the
City of Denton's support for current legislation.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the state and country need to
address the issue.
I
Mayor Stewart stated that maintenance costs should be kept in mind.
The following resolution was presented;
R E 5 0 L U T I 0 N
WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Council is the policy
body of the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Uallas- Fort
North urban area; and
WHIM ASI over the next 20 years, the population of Texas is
expected to increase by about 50 percent; and
WHEREAS, recent surveys of the Texas transportation system
reveal that;
1. Texas leads the nation In deficient bridges (17,200) and
deteriorated state roadways (7,740 miles;
2. Texas will have to triple Its present rate of hi hway
construction and maintenance funning to handle an anticipated
traffic increase of more than 50 percent it the next 20 years;
3. Texas motorists each currently pay an average of $29: per
year of "bad roads tax" in excessive fuel use and vehicle
damage and wear;
4. Texas cities cannot keep up with a growing backlog of street
repairs, although they now spend 58 percent more for that
purpose than three years ago; and
hHbREAS, a large number of Texas citizens depend upon transit
systems as their sole means of transportation; and
WHEREAS, additional funds are needed to replace aging transit
equipment and to provide additional equipment to met new demands; and
WHEREAS, increased state revenues for transportation vou)d
reduce dependence upon the fader al government and vulnerability to
federal funding cutbacks; and
WHEREAS, urban areas contrlbute a substantial portion of state
and federal revenues generated by vehicle use, NOW, 'CHEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF l'tIE CITY OF DENTON, CE\AS:
SECTION I.
That the Regional Transportation Council strongly urges the
Texas Legislature to provide additional state funding for both road
and mass transportation improvements; in particular, a level >f at
least $70 million per biennium is needed for public transportation,
City Council Minutes
Meetin of April 19, 1983
Page eleven
SECTION I1.
That the Regional Transportation Council recommends tha: an
increase in state transportation user fees be permitted only _f a
minimum of 60 percent of the additional funding to the :fate
Department of Highways and Public Transportation is spent in i.., ban
areas.
SECTION III,
That the Regional Transportation Council supports leg slatt:a: to
establish a city street improvement fund (The Pothole Bill .
SUCTION IV,
That the Regional Transportation CouncII recommends the
aIloci, t!on of transportation user fee revenues whlch will praride
matching i;~nds to assure full use of federal highway and tr .nsit
funds avallable to Texas,
SECTION V.
That this Resolution shall be forwarded to members of the _iate
Le isla ture representing the North Control Texas region and 7.t in
effect lmmedlately upon its adoption,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of April, 1983.
RICKTRAD 0. J , MAYOR
CI'T'Y OF DIiN'PON, 'TEXAS
ATTEST;
ALLEN, CITY SHCRBIARY
CITY OF DUNTON, 'T'EXAS
APPROVED AS 'FU LEGAL FURM;
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DEN'TON, TEXAS
BY;
Chew motion, Barton second that the resolution be passed, roil
call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alfora "Lve",
Riddlesporger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "aye". Motion .:a:ried
unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of a resolut::a in
sympathy and support of the Baha'is in Iran,
Council Member Chew stated that the Council had hoard a repo:_ from
the Baha'is of Denton at the April S Council meeting.
'File following resolution was presented;
R E S 0 L U T 1 U N
%1JEREAS, we live in a world that snakes universal auman
rights our first priority if civilization is to survive and aaiance;
and
~I
City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 19, 1983
Page 'T'welve
WHEREAS, a major obstacle to tIto attainment of unlvtrsal
human rights is the prejudice that manifests itself in the
prosecution of a people for their religious beliefs; and
WHEREAS, the earth Is, In reality, one country and m.tnkind
its citizens; and
WHEREAS, we in America have been given groat spiritual
capacities and blessings;
WHEREAS we must take the leadership In the quest f.Nt an
attainment of universal human rights and religious freedom;
NOW, THEREFORE$ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
That we, the City Council of Don ton, Texas, do atreby
protest the relentless persecution of members of the Bohai Faith in
Iran; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of Denton,
Texas enacts this resolution of sympathy and support of the 84sa'is
of Iran In order that the world may know our sentiments on this
humanitarian issue.
PASSED AND APPROVHD this the 19th day of April, 1983,
1TTCHARD`0, ,
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
ATTEST;
C , UI1Y SECITMITY
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C, J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Chew motion, Stephens second that the resolution be passed, Or. roll
call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddiesparger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor "ayo". Motion ci:ried
unanimously,
i
Council Member Barton requested a resolution be placed on the >ci, 10
agenda to reflect the same support for all religious denominate:-1s,
D. Tto Council considered adoption of a ros,:.~tion
postponing the regular meeting of the City council on May 3. !983
until May 10, 1983,
The following resolution sins presented:
City Council Minutes
Mooting of April 19, 1983
Page Thirteen
s
R E S 0 L II 'r 1 0 N
WHEREAS, a majority of the Council will be out of the Cit
of Denton on May 3, 1983, and it Is necessary that the Counci~
meeting for such date be postponed until May 10, 1983; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY 'rHE CITY COUNCIL Oil THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SUCTION 1.
That the regular Council meeting to be held on May 3, 1983
be postponed until May 10, 1983.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 19th day of April, 1983.
CITY OF BENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTU ALLEj -1-C t 'T
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LBOAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TflXAS
BY:
Stephen motion, Alford second that the resolution be passed. On
roll call veto Dorton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford
Faye", ".ddlesperger "aye", Chew Faye", and Mayor "aye,,. Motion
Carr' a unanimously.
7. The Council received a report on TMPA activities.
Dr. Roland Vela, TMPA Board of Directors, reported that the formal
dedication of the power plant was held on April 15. The plant has
been running for 5 months with almost no expenditures for repairs.
The facility had been run at full capacity. There had been a few
problems with the lignite fuel when it became wet but those problems
had been worked ou;.
The total cost 0f the plant is 1.361 billion dollars and is
considered by the power industry as one of the best in the Country.
Or. Vela stated that the Board of Directors had done an excellent
job and praised several individuals who he felt had been vital to
the su-cess of the 1'MPA project.
Dr. Vela reported that the engineers estimates in 1978 were that the
cost of electricity at the plant would be approximately 82.9 mils a
kilowatt hour and the national average was 73.8 mils per kilowatt
hour, and that a gas power plant would cost 53.8 mils per kilowatt
hour. The new estimato for the TMPA plant is 45.9 mils per kilowatt
hour.
City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 19, 1985
Pago Fourteen
Dr. Vela also stated that Mr. Erwin, Chairman of the Texas PuJn,ie
Utility Commission, in his address at the TMPA dedication had
compared the facility to the South Texas nuclear plant.
Dr. Vein reported that he was very proud of his association %ith
TMPA. Now that the plant was operational, the board would look eery
closely at the Comanche Peak nuclear project which is ne,iring
completion.
Mayor Stewart, also a member of t,to TMPA Board of Directors, izded
that the plant was running in a very smooth and timely fashion. A
producing gas well was on the property so gas could be used at some
future date if the need arose.
Council Member Stephens stated that Dr. Vela had helped to Lave
millions of dollars for TMPA and that the City Council appreccat ed
his efforts.
City Manager Hartung commented that the dedication ceremonies were
handled very efficiently by the TMPA Staff and the ropresenta;ives
from Denton were very pleased,
a. The Council considered changing the signal sequence a; the
intersection of Bell and Hickory,
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehia reported that this item had ,,een
brought to the Council on April S.
Council Member Chew stated that there exists an obstructicr. of
traffic viewing from Bell to Hickory and asked if the signal lights
could be placed on full cycle 24 hours a day as opposed to flashing
after 1Or00 p.m.
Svehla replied that the controller for this signal was very olt and
the wires were extremely brittle. Tha Traffic Department coulc try
to reprogram the controller but it might blow up.
City Manager Hartung asked when the controller could be replaced.
Svehla replied that the City would advertise for bids for
replacement controllers in Ma!.
Council Member Chew restated that he believed the traffic ~;:gnal
should be on full cycle 24 hours a day.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to table. Motion carried unanimous,.
9. The Council considered the request of Ms. Darles Ivatse-. for
a curb cut on Carroll Boulevard.
Assistant City Manager Svehla reported that this item had been
tabled at the April 5 meeting so as to give the Staff an oppor: nity
to see the site of the proposed curb cut. blr. Svehla had visited
with Ms. Watson and had discussed with her a turn around cr, the
property rather than a curb cut.
Hopkins motion, Riddlespergor second to follow the Staff
recommendation for the turn around and to deny the curb cut.
10. 'rho Council considered the selection of the Mayor Pro fern.
Council Member Stephens' name was entered into nomination by i,.ancil
Jrember Chow.
Council Member Riddlesperger's name was entered into nominatt:n by
Council Member Barton.
City Council Minutes
Meetingg of April 19, 1983
Page Aiftoon
Council Member Stephens withdrew his name from the nominations and
nominated Council Member Chew.
Council Member Chow withdrew his name from the nomination in suggort
of Council Member Riddlesporger.
Barton motion, Hopkins second to select Council Member ~Laes
Riddlesperger as the Mayor Pro Tom. Motion carried unanimously.
11. There was no official action on Executive Session items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
12. New Business;
The following items were suggested for Future agendas;
1. Council Member Barton requested a resolution in Opp* son
to all religious persecution.
RTCHAR D 0. -51BW ,
CHARLOT'! lCL LEN,
1 ~oSC
CITY OF DENTON Ot /7•
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETCNG: May 10, 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM k Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: Bid it 9109 Pecan Creek Dam
SUMMARY: This bid is for the construction of a Dam across
Pecan Creek at and near the Wastewater Treatment
plant as per some prior coinnitment, The bids were
sent to over 20 contractors and suppliers and five
bids were received, They range from the low bid
by Jay-Mar Corporation of $55,518,00 to a high of
$95,370.00 by Ashler Contracting company, The bid
proposal time was extended for acceptance until
May 25, 1983.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council,
ALTERNATIVES: Refuse all bids and rebid or postpone the protect.
RECOMMENDATIONS: We reconm end the low bid be approved to Jay-Mar
Corporation in the amount of $55,518.00,
EXHIBITS; TabulatloA. sheet.
SUBMITTED BY;
~ /Johl J, Mats ha I I , C.p,M,
/ I a-isng Agent
JJM:Ic
xtu n 9109 -
t3t1) '1'L'YGha ~'>+Gatil e~:k bam _
UE'FNh.U .21 Ln3 _ _ Red River Jay-Mar BAR Const. Ashler IMA Vinson
ACCOUNT 9 Const, Co, Corp. 1nC, Const, Const. Co.
!1 _ QTY " ~1~1 5 EtIE''CION VFNUOEt~ IIF.Nb01~, . V~N[10I~_.W _ VFNDOR VENDOR- VENDOR_ VENDOR
Lump Sum Total Bid Price 62:600.00 _ 55,5113.00 63,910.00 95 370,00 5G 343,60 ~
Bid Bond _YOS VeS Yes es es
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT;
Consider Recommendation Of Award Of Bid For Pecan Creek Dam,
Bid 09109
SUMMARY:
As consideration of settlement of a lawsuit by Felix Callahan
regarding the property at the Wastewater Treatment Plant, the
City agreed to construct a low water diversion dam on Pecan
Creek. Bids were opened on February 151 1983, with bids
ranging from $55,518 to $95,370.
After a relay pending additional discussions with Felix
Callahan on possible alternatives, it is recommended that the
low bidoer of Jay-Mar Corporation be awarded the contract for
$55,518,
FISCAL SUMMARY;
Cost $55,518
Source of Funds - Water Bond Funds.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Recommendation from City Council to accept the low bid from
Jay-Mar Corporation for the co,struction of the Pecan Creek Dam
in the amount of $55$18.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities hoard, at their meeting of April 20, 1983,
recommended to the City Council that the low bid from Jay-Mar
Corporation in the amount of $°5,518 for the construction of
the Pecan Creek Dam be accepted,
Respectfully,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Bid Tabulation
II Location Map - Pecan Creek Dam
1994U/3
EXHIBIT xx
LOCATION MAP PECAN CRK
DAM
1IlC WTY MAP
u.
.V4s
Tp ~
M
a
Ffzj Wr .
U(4714m ~''{r rr
~i4fStFk MAO
k
L
5- PUB MEnutes 4-20-83
6, CONSIDER FUNDING AND PURCHASE OF THE SYSTE~j CONTROL AND DATA
ACQUISIT_WN SCADA) FOR THE RAW WATER PUMP STA'PION AND WATER
PLANT:
Ham briefed the Board by stating that this was a remote control
system and capable of starting and stopping motors and pumps,
opening and closing valves at the Raw Water Pump Station. He
added that the low bidder was Advanced Control Systems,
Incorporated out of Atlanta, Georgia and that the total package
would cost $32077 and recommended that the Advanced Control
Systems bid be accepted, Herring made a motion to recommend to
the City Council that the SCADA system be purchased From
Advanced Control systems, Incorporated of Atlanta, Georgia, in
the amount of $32,077. Second by Cryan, four ayes, no naves,
motion carried.
7. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD OF BID FOR PECAN CREEK DAM:
Ham briefed the Board by stating that there were five (5)
bidders on the project, bidding prices that ranged from a low
bid of $55,518 to a high bid of $95,370. Chairman Laney as.ed
if this was part of the Felix Callahan settlement. Nelson
replied that it was and added that the City has held up on
awarding this bid in order to examine various alternatives
which would include an in-house effort to build the dam.
Nelson added that the review of these alternatives were not
very favorable. Cryan than made a motion to recommend to the
City Council that Jay-Mar Corporation be awarded the bid in the
L amount of $55,518. Second by Laney, three ayes, no nayes, one
abstention (Herring), motion passed.
8. CONSIDER PURCHASING EASE:MLNTS FROM T4XAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
I Try
. =
Tullos briefed the board by stating that in order. to extend
electrical distribution to the north and south out of the new
Airport Substation, it would be necessary : to acquire
right-of-way. He added that TMPA has the right-o£-way for
their transmission line to the north and south from this
station and have agreed to offer 15' of the west side of their
easement for our use. Tullos concluded by stating that TM PA
has offered these easements for a total of $10. Herring then
made a motion to recommend to the City Council that sub;ect
easement purchase be approved. Second by Cryan, four ayes, no
nayes, motion carried.
014
r • 1
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: May 10, 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N Consent agenda
SUBJECT: Bid k 9138 Ranch Estates Sewerlines
SUMMARY: This bid is for the construction of Ranch Estates
sewerlines, We received seven bid porposals. We
estimated the cost at $240,233,50 and received two
estimated below that amount, You will note the low
bidder Dickerson Construction included an alternate
Rock Clause in his bid of $10,00 extra per cubic yard
of rock removed with a maximum of 310 cubic yards,
When we add this Dickerson is still low. We will pay
only for the cubic yards of rock removed or up to
310 cubic yards as the final and total amount of the
contract of $213,477,25.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council,
ALTERNATIVES: Not approve the low bid, order the project re-bid or
not approve and delay the projcet,
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget account 624-008-0471-9114,
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Dickerson
Construction Company with the Rock Clause and the amount
of the contract not to exceed $218,477,25,
EXHIBITS: Tabull ation heet.
SUBMITTED BY:
John\J, M ,sha 1, C. P.M.
Purchasing Agent
JJM:lc
sln N 9138
DID '1'1T1.@;_ Ranch Cs_ tates Sewerl ines j
OPENED 4/14/83 Dickerson Lightning Bowles Si nacola IR,L. Roberts Jay-mar B
Coast. Coast. Co. an S"r`~
Ac;000N'r d 624-008-0471-9114 Const. & Sons Const.,lnc Corti. & Co.
st~0 5 ' LI'T 0 - i
_ VENDOR
VNUOk-VNUOR VfsNUOR VE:NUOR~ Vf3NU0R _VH,NUUR
i
1. Total lump sum bid 215,377.25 220,850.25 249,041.34 354,739.75 284,136.50 297,686.20 !442,228.10
Rock Clause pet, cu, yd. 10.00 ~Max. 310 yds. 3,100.00
Total With Maxi+itum rock charges - 218,477.25 -
' May 100 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJ4CT i
Consider Recommendation Of Award Of Bid For Ranch Estates
Sewerlines, BID 09138
SUMMARYi
bids were opened on the above referenced project on April 14,
1983. A total of 7 bids were received ranging from $218,477.25
to $442,228.10, (See Exhibit I,) The Contractor, Dickerson
Construction Company, Inc,, is considered an acceptable
contractor with an acceptable low bid. The proposed date of
beginning construction after Council approval will be
approximately June 1, 1983. A public meeting was held on April
17, 1983, to brief property owners in stanch Estates concerning
this forthcoming construction. At this meeting, the pro-rata
amounts were provided to property owners with the requirement
that these pro-rata amounts must be paid according to City
Ordinance in order for this project to be constructed. The
pru-rata amounts vary according to length of property frontage
and current pipe laying costs, The dollar amounts of pro-rata
vary from about $1500 to $2500 per lot. The amount of pro-rata
to be paid by property owners to the City is approximately
$108,155 or 508 of the project cost.
FISCAL SULL"IMARY i
Recommendations are as follows:
1. Dickerson Construction Co. $218,477.25
(includes rock clause)
2, Lightning Construction Co., Inc. $220,850.25
3. Bowles Construction Company $249,041.34
Source of Funds- Water Frond Funds
ACTION REQUIRED;
Recommendation by City Council to accept the low bid from
Dickerson Construction Company, Inc., for the installation of
sewerlines in Ranch Estates in the amount of $218,477.25, which
includes $3,100 for possible rock.
RECOMMNDATIUN
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of April 20, 1983,
recommended to the City Council that the low bid from Dickerson
Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $218,477.25 oe
accepted.
Respectfully,
22-7; V
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Bid Tabulation
I in , r r t ,l
PUB M1nutes 4-20-83
.4-
4. CONSIDER ECONOMIC AID PROGRAM FOR HARDSHIP UTILITY CUSTOMERSi
Laney began the review on this item by updating Reverend
Rasberry on the reasons the board felt such a program was
warranted, Laney then asked the Reverend Rasberry for his
opinions on the program. Reverend Rasberry stated that he was
employed by the National Southern Baptist Convention and then,
discussed activities involving the many aid programs that were
available to help the poor. Reverend Rasberry then discussed
his past experience in working in these areas and briefed the
Board on where he felt such aid programs were heading.
Reverend Rasberry closed by saying that he would stand ready to
help in any way he could to assist the City in development of
an economic aid program.
After a general discussion, Loveless made a motion thanking
Reverend Rasberry for coming to the Board to discuss these
concerns and added that the Public Utilities board ask the
Reverend Rasberry to help the Utility Department develop bill
stuffers to advise the citizens of the various economic aid
programs. Second by Coomes, five ayes, no naves, motion
carried.
The Public Utilities Board, through concensus, then asked the
-Staff to develop a program of implementation of the economic
aid programs for the Board to review at their next Public
Utilities Board meeting. Such a program should incluoe a
method whereby the customers could voluntarily donate money to
an aid fund with the collections handled through the monthly
utility bill.
Prior to discussion on Item 05, Member Coomes left, the meeting.
5. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD OF BID FOR RANCH ESTATES
SEWERLINEt
Ham briefed the Board by stating that bids were opened on the
Ranch Estates Sewerline project on April 14, 1983, He a aced
that a total of seven (7) bids were received ranging :tom
$218,477 to $442,228. Ham continued by stating that the
contractor, Dickerson Construction, Incorporated, is consicered
an acceptable contractor with an acceptable low bid and
recommended that Dickerson Construction be awarded the big in
the amount of $218,477.25. Cryan made a motion to recommend to
the City Council that the Ranch Estates Sewerline bid be
awarded to Dickerson Construction Company in the amount of
$218,477.25. Second by Herring, four ayes, no naves, motion
carried.
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: May 10, 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: Bid # 9143 Sprockets & Chains
SUMMARY: This bid is for the repair parts for the submergence
flocculators at the dater Production Plant, We need
to get these replacement sprockets and chains every
few years. We sent out to the only known supplies
and received four bids, as shown on the tabulation
sheet.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council,
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget account 620-008-0460-8339.
RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be approved to purchase these
repair parts form the low bidder of I.P.S. Industries
for the total net price of $3,924.00 with 42 days
delivery after receipt of order. This is considered
a good competitive bid compared to past bids and
delivery time.
EXHIBIT'S: -Tabulat' sheet.
SUBMITTED BY: C
ohn~J. ar C.P.M.
~rPurching Agent
JJM:1c
Stan 9143
BID 'I'I'1LE Sprockets & Chains
011KN1PID 4/19/03 11P,S, Mechanical Jeffery A & T
- Industries Southwest Chain Bearing
ACCOUNT #620-008-0460-8339 Inc.
c~11f~I VENDOR _ VI:NUillt VLNWIt~ VE:NUOR VENI)ON~_ VPNllOR _ V1;N1)U[t-
4 Drive Chains 11400.00 1,475.60 15428.00 1,425,76
2. 4 49 tooth sprockets 15868.00 11954.00 11,900,00 2,540.00 - - -
3, 2 22 tooth sprockets 328,00 344.80 334.00 392.94
4. 2 22 tooth sprockets 328.00 344.80 334.00 392.94 [
_-Del ivE+.ry - 42 d4s 42-58 clays ~ 21 days
FOB µ DENTON DENTON _ DENTON DENTON -
- -
i
i
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: May 10, 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: Bid k 9146 Repair Raw Water Pump
SUMMARY: This bid is for a pump repair company to pull Raw Water
pump #1, Layne-Bowles pump serial ND-16313, Repair the
pump with the estimated cost of parts, repair labor and
reinstall the pump; start up and check pump after repair
has been completed, We sent this bid to six capable
bidders and received only the two bids shown on the
tabulation sheet. We have compared this with the last
bid for repairing a like pump and considered these
competitive bids,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council,
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget account 620-008-0460-8339.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder of
Layne/Western Company, Inc., to repair the punts. After
the department has estimated the parts to be used at
the price bid, are propose the estimated cost to be
$13,698,00 as shown on the tabulation sheet, If,
however, more or less parts or used the prices bid
for each part shall prevail, We recommend approval of
this bid to Layne/Western at $135698.00.
EXHIBITS: IT-abuIat n sheet.
SUBMITTED BY:
J hn J; Marshall, C.P.M.
/ Purcidsing Agent
JJM:1 c
HTU 9146 _
ETU '1'T'P R REPAIR RAW WATER PUMP
Sill itl1 Layne/Weste n
011ENru _ 4/21/83 _ Pump Co. Pump Co.
A(TOUNT l!
IF
STY,-I JUOit VENDOR _ V1: DOR _ VENDOR HND0k
1. _ Pull & install pump 2,500.00 21740.00
2W -Repair parts, estimate only _ 10,064.00 10,030.00
3. Labor to repair pinup 3, 700.00 920.00
TOTAL W 1 & 3 6,200.00 3,668,00 _
TOTAL 1/ 1, 2, & 3 16,264.00 13,698,00 - _ -
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING; May 10, 1983
COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM N Consent Agenda
SUBJECT; Purchase order N57644 to Conley-Lott-Nichols
SUMMARY; This purchase order to Conley-Lott-Nichols in the
amount of $3,584,75 is for the parts necessary to
repair the Terex S-IIE Scraper at the landfill,
ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council,
SOURCE OF FUNDS; Vehicle Maintenance working capital 710-004-0598-8710.
RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this purchase order be approved and
invoice 50498 be processed for payment,
EXHIBITS; Pu, chase ord r 57644; invoice 50498,
SUBMITTED BY; ~y
Tom D, Shaw, P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
TDS,Ic
OF DBNTON, PURCHASING DEPT, PURCHASE OROIR NUMRBR 57644
218 8, MoKlnneY
Damon,-Texas 78201. ...•■*uy
/t3868911 D/FW MMtro 2974042 , 0Ar1 w3..1y~83 IID NO.
e TOM W.O. No.
VINOOR NO, ~
DftuVIRT ACCT 40.
710-004-059"710
~Nar
GaalesT+T~ott-til,obols ,
Tot CITY OF DENTON
V41ial• mai.nt o
w P.O. NOON ALL SHIPMENTS, 09LIVERY TICKETS, INVOICES ETC„ SEND INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE. THE CITY OF CENTON, TEXAS
EXEMPT FROM SALES TAX AS PER FIOUSE RILL. 020. TH'S CITY OF OENTON IS PROH181TE0 FROM PAYING FOR MERCHANDISE BEFORE IT IS
CEIVED, ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE F,O,B„ CITY OF WINTON, TEXAS
M CITY STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION QUAN /UNIT PRICE ►MOUNT
!sakes the n+memarr repairs to rig. 02495 - Tezmt 18OOT, 3,584.75
Serial WIN Sarsper lot
invoice # 50498
1
CCtvpr ;~rr~7rro~r t~v.
!D CII S.L- 0,
~t
PLICA,
.
I
i
,
i
Direct All Inquiries To; ~j
rJoh(m,J, OF DSNTON, PURCHASING DEPT. 3 f tC.3
Marshall, C,P,M„ Purchasing Agent-
, Shaw, C,P,M., Asst. Purchasing Agent_
v I
illltll•IN'406v 11•iiH ilY•11/•1ltll 1~7NIj•71J1
J00N4!/411 101'717y711 NiM11/7N 1111411.1411 {11137 1JIJ F1344-11400
I l"l 17,11 1
C Q S MACHINERY COMPAN'(
ACOT NO IN VOICH NO 7~'t 1110
SOLD TO
CITY OF DEI~lTPN 2609 54499 1) 3 24 13 1
i I
215 C. MC`CINNEY
0CIN TQN TX 76201 PAST DUE ACCOUNTS BEAR INTEREST AT THE HIOHES
LAWFUL RATE. ALL SUMS INVOICED HEREON ARf
SHIP TO (SAME AS SOLO TO IF BLANK) PAYABLE AT
9 .C O RG.( 22282t
DALLAS 1 TX 73222
- oT rr o7 70A T.0►tor7 uc INa 1x1 30 TBRaf N9T 10YN OF
3 X19 83 CALLED FOR 57644 Y~ K2906 MON'' FOLI.0WINO
I I 0A14 JF INVOICE
•wwwi QUJNnr. PART NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION UNIT PpICE AMOUNT
_ 0,0 SHOW
- r 7 I
TE'REX 18UOT S-11G I I
2 9052147 SPROCMET 780;23 11546 56
2 9037953 ROLLER 391:65 793;30
2 9037599 R IVG I' L l 21 22
2 9410967 0 RING }34 f68
1 9036121 VALV 7:68 708
1 941LOLO FITTING 6.23 1,23
1,20 0136725 86LT t36 43iZo
120 9037497 NUT 463 75j6O
1 9052481 CHAIN SET 1,09708 1,0971,311
5701''?5;t
1 I
I I
INSOUNO FREIGHT - 13}90
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 11 I I
1
I 1
'Vb' +alOn10 'On 1000{ IAWVI! nrn0ur Jul Hna140v y\ of rnnrJ Vvl1 11 N 'in •Ond UOV Iu0 w01 nJr• l+
0
ary01M <Ia10111n0+1.Ii0vf over ICC iwn11u1pp On 04~4 Np11w1i1( 11100 ni1.r 00111101 Wld<r 10 1 1(•llpCniNp On TdTAL $ 3, 534} 7i
VO Cnu01 C\a11{ 0 0
DUPLICATE INVOICE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHLLT
Datei May 10, 1983
Subjects Approval of the final plat of the Village -
Phase 1V.
Summary: The property is located on the north side
of Windsor uri.ve adjacent and west of and
adjacent and north of the Windsor Village
Apartments. The property also has 50' of
frontage on Stuart Road. The '7.461 acre
tract is zoned planned development (PD) f:::
duplex and fourplex use. Block 4 is re-
stricted for uuplex use and blocks 5 and
are restricted for fourplex development.
Action Reyuireo, Approve the final plat.
Recommendation: The plat satisfies subdivision regulation
requirements, The Planning and Coning
Commission recommended approval by a vote
of 6-0 at its meeting of April 27, 1983.
Alternative: Approve the final plat.
Attachments; 1. Reduced piat
2. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion meeting of April 27, 1983
David Ellison, Development Review Planner
nl is lq
I
OIIII
POlhr 07 @[II4U
'11000,
1 lA tl p~ Y IIL' r. II bf, rY' 4 ~ i II +Y b ,1 t6 I♦l ~ _ ~1NS1 llW'•
dal?. i~ 1 TLOCK to `bfk i'a'? : f
2 311 4 6 i 8 (g 0 9 f5 10 i lift 'IS! + i 15..,:
,~-~.,yl. i~ r~. 1~+OLYMPIA i rt...DRIVE srna~._..~;
V P 1 I
1 i 10 1Y { 11100' it r•
N e "IV•
PHASE Y 1•','iill~ 11.. y
1 E.oF I , MOCA 9 Y + nl vAY
s " • W U J 11 111.1
:;I I'4. I
Y ` r
Ilk
b o. lAQ C O a " R S ~ I ICJ 1•YY~yY--`'llyq ,I11 LY:Y .,.q•
M d p -rn'll'.I AD( xJ ~--~~-W' V(J N V Wal f6671 SO V qq YH IIS11
N V 4
Q i Vr11110^_ G
y 'b U C 4 ~r 1 la 11 116 71 11 F 111 II N9 1 p,
- Y11A7..
• n 11 ~a1 01.11 W RAY 11- O'•A _u Jtl~ r":1!`
013
.~J( • • 11 1••q 1 y..ln !
Ip L o ` I 0 1 I H I I 1 U 11 • v. J• 1 1 I
Q •Fy•r 1 r l iT
W qVt
3 • ro
S_ i, 1 r
' 1 Y. rl 11 ll•
1 I:y It
11 •11~1.111~Yr Its
UII IVF M'•.11 Of VF LIJP I II 111 ;ONV 1 ,
l 1' :
C
b ,
h
HLN l MiL t
j LK A
1 I 2 3 1 J g t I 2
I 5
/ IDO'A1 Ir'•
STUART ROAD
ur,aookeaoo•
a"o I n o N
FINAL PLAT
THE_ VILLAGE
pHASE IV
-
.P 2 DIV1SlWLLN 171FCi rCt pE11TON
0£11TON COUIITY,Tf RA<
RECEIVED MAR 011 1983 NASH CORPORATION-
RUIISUIHNO ENfiI1lam
101'IlIAl11 AIVANM LID u:SflSi J/l
WALE
-
_J'1W N[Itl lrit.'f 1. r• rtclt 1.• •yy 71 N WE J
DALE REVISION IV All. CYO lY j IIt t' 4-0
RI ViS10NS App, IV ot
I
P & Z Minutes
April 27, 1983
Page 11
Mr. Escue made motion to approve the preliminary plat of
the Oak Meadows Addition, Section II. Seconded by Ms.
Cole and carried. (6-0)
D, Approval of the preliminary plat or lots I and 2 of the
Thompson Addition,; ,Section: XI. ,
Mr. Ellison stated this property is located on the west
side of Old North Road approximately,550' south of
Foxcroft Street, The tract is zoned multi-family (MF-1)
and apartment development is anticipated on this tract.
Staff recommends-approval:-
Mr. La Forte moved to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat of lots 1 and 2 of the Thompson
Addition, Section Two. Seconded by Ms. Cole and carried
unanimously. (6-0)
E. Approval of the preliminary plat and the final plat of
the Stone Hill Apartments Addition.
Mr. Ellison explained this is the petition of the
preliminary and final plats of the Stone Hill Apartments
Addition. The property is located on the north side of
the I-35B service road approximately 400' east of Loop
288 and immediately adjacent and east of 4Valmart. The
13.149 acre tract is the section of planned development
(PD-28) that was recently amended to permit multi-famil~fi-
development. The PD site plan permits the construction
of 404 apartment units. Staff recommends- approval.
Mr. Claiborne made motion to approve the preliminary ant--,
final plats of the Stone Hill Apartments Addition.
Seconded by Mr. Sidor and carried. (6-0)
UNAPPROVED IF. Approval of the final plat: of The Village - Phase IV.
Mr. Ellison explained this is the final plat of The
Village - Phase IV. He said everything is fine and
staff recommends approval.
Mr. Escue moved to approve the final plat of The Vil.laq~i
- Phase 1V. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and carried
unanimously. (6-0)
a2.~a2►
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHLET
Date: May 10, 1983
subject: Approval of the final plat Of the Stone
dill Subdivision.
6 ummar.y: The property i3 located on the north side
of the L.H. 35i; service road approximately
400' east of Loop 288 and immediately adja-
cent and east of Walmart. The 13.145 acre
tract is the section of planned development
(PD-28) that was recently amended to permit
multi-family development. The PD site pian
permits the construction of 404 apartment
units.
i
Action Required: Approve the final plat of the Stone Hill
Subdivision.
Recommendation: The final plat ana plans conform with
technical requirements of the subdivision
regulations. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval of the final
plat by a vote of 6-0.
Alternative: Approve the final plat.
Attachments: 1. Reduced plat
2. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting of April 27, 1983
h C k(('1
David Ellison, Development Review Planner
CA +Nf1 C' Offrp+N rMff9
lOf l1 tot to
LOf I lurwrJp•
/u f ~-anvuv. lrN ra l ulurr uar~, ~OYORdOO.
71
J
'1 L 7rK.___
J 7II` JI
M 110 ~}71r, ~_r _ ~ lrtr- i,ulr ~ r
^ w 1 mrr } Flr - h r r _ Irr.r
_ 77 e
'hj5_• I jI Al ~rr~~YN r~ 1~ Vr Irrll 5 rIJ ill _•.m r1 L _ 1 L
.Ip ll.lY
®r
i a ~thL 3 . .~I rl
/ 1.
IJIr
P~ ;M 'i. 0 iJlr_._..•._-_..'Yil'Ad'f ~l~ _'1 /sl'NP1~
' /g/'• ~ i 1'~~ ~3 Nl. fi1,j'• 1.
r.r•„yA r4 1~ I I I 3 r~1 ~7..~ N T f
n f r 1' -~I Pl lrp 1I1✓ ~ I.
I
Old
jl "-,11'11 M119-ir1/•-~ _ _ _
ti~ l.J
• v, i t ( 1 i 4 ~I
a 7 ~ ; i ZI Il 111 'Y ~
1
' 1 a
l ~
1 I I y/ i. l I j
1•~✓' I
titit
Tp / I r r
rl J
,l r 1:rjruv ~Ir ] N1 ✓ Af ~!J L!"!'!i 1LL
~i ' Iw~r4 ~i it nx'ISr7f ..1 ~~+i r •t 171 /I 1. 1 .`l.'1
1 IiJ IIt P rl ,ur 1( i J,1 X11
L I I r ` r9- ul'11U ` pIL,.. i,~n. 11.
rnlrru (rl'P~ _ 1, d'~ / N '
I ~ 1 ~ ~ PI f Ilf' 'i^,' t S
1
~~I~~ l~ •r'">,N," Z ,11
I.-J 'D l~1 ,~-•r'r .Y r1 {i 1 1" r .~~1 ~•..71..J i'"7 "7" r.
1 _ u . nL Il.-Lnr fl..
XEffh[01111 1 L
.'ll: wr.lw. r Ylq'J1Y4W r:ry 1,114.: ✓\I( Jl At
TNf SIDNf NILL APAN`rAf
tV rs
f.l'. .T~i, i 7rF::~I;C r7,1'Y•"J'•..~^..~, .~r ..._.....r ojwovr If.YAS
d•~1 J uur or . f
1.'' 0.1 Ipl 1 111 L VI
n • 1.e1 l OhN un:CxJN rt',,,'' L .1
I' ..r OH'1[ trvPfer /19tH i.
Y.I ..I NMUI~YYM.1.r11V ___rY '~~YI
`•Nf"I""1 I I II,Y(1•",Vlrl r d'rt CJ I If A JI':i r rfl
~l`I' ~IJr}ff
1 , AJrIf I/11i f 111,1!I1J,,
+titW J, rfxU f!!or i
P & 'G Minutes
April 27, 1983
Page 11
Mr._ESoue made-motion to approve the preliminary plat of
the Oak Meadows Addition, Section II. Seconded by Ms.
Cole and carried. (6-0)
D. Approval of the preliminary plat oe lots 1 and 2 of the
Thompson Addition;,Seotion)Il..
Mr. Ellison stated this property is located on the west
side of Old North Road approximately,550' south of
Foxcroft Street. The tract is :toned multi-family (MF-1)
and apartment development.is anticipated on this tract.
Staff recommends.approval.
Mr. LaForre moved to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat of lots 1 and 2 of the Thompson
Addition, Section Two. Seconded by Ms. Cole and carried
unanimously. (6-0)
UNAPPROVED E. Approval of the preliminary plat and the final plat of
the Stone Hill Apartments Addition.
Mr. Ellison explained this is the petition of the
preliminary and final plats of the Stone Hill Apartments
Addition. The property is located on the north side of
the I-358 service road approximately 400' east of Loop
288 and immediately adjacent and east of Walmart. The
13.149 acre tract is the section of planned development
(PD-28) that was recently amended to permit multi-family
development. 'The PD site. plan permits the co~)struction
of 404 apartment units. Staff recommends-approval.
Mr. Claiborne made motion to approve the preliminary and
final plats of the Stone Hill Apartments Addition.
Seconded by Mr. Sidor and carried. (6-0)
F. Approval of the final plat of The Village - Phase IV.
Mr. Ellison explained this is the final plat of The
Village - Phase IV. He said everything is fine and
staff recommends approval.
Mr. Escue moved to approve the final plat of The Village
- Phase IV. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and carried
unanimously. (6-0)
ciryo(DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (811! `'d'..8200
MEMO RAN DU14
DATE: May 4, 1983
TO: Charlotte Allen, City Secretary
FROM: Robert Hagemann, Fite Elarshal
SUBJECT: Fireworks Display
Our office has received an application for a fireworks dis-
play from Denton Kiwanis Club, to be conducted at Fouts
Field, North Texas State University, on July 4, 1983,
Attached is a copy of tht, site inspection report. The re-
port reveals that all safeLj regulations of both City and
State have been complied with this application, and meets
the approval of the Fire Marshal,
As soon as the City Council members give their nermission,
we will issue a permit for raid display,
d
Robert Hagemann
Fire Marshal
RH/ec
w (~w
TO R£ COMPLETED 8Y OFFICER MAKING INYESTIOATION1
1. If applicant is a pere'on, is he an adult? Yes or,No. Yea
2. Is the person who will handle or aupervise the display approved
by you as a competent and experiesic'ed pyrotechnic operator, if
Class A fireworks are to be used in such display, or is such
person approved by you as a competent adult person, if Class a
fireworks only are to be used in such display? Yes or No, 'e
3. Will such display be in accordance with local ordinances or
regulations? Yes or No. Yes
4. Will such display be in accordance with the rules and regulations
set out in Commissioner of Insurance's official Order No. 8584,
adopted by the Commissioner of Insurance in his official capacity
as State Fire Marshal? Yes or No yen
5. Will such display be hazardouelto props+rty or dangerous to any
person? Yes or No, No
6. Do you approve or disapprove the application?. Approved
7, If you approve the application, is your approval subject to any
conditions? Yes or No.,, Yes List Conditions
SLE•s ATTAC11M1'',NTS -
~"i,~JL ~ CUB ry!'~GLLLI•✓
S ig na ure
i`Ire Ai~irr~hsl
Title r
April 260 1983
Date
Listed below are the conditions that are subJ Oct: to the ap-
proval of the application submitted,
1. The City Council approves and grants permit for the fire-
works display on 12y 4, 1983,
2, Fireworks not to be stored within the City Limits of
Denton. •
'3. The fireworks be delivered to location of display the
day of event, (July 4, 1983).
4. Follow guidelines set out by the Conunissioners of Insur-
ance Official Order #8584 (copy attached),
5. Any fireworks that remain unfirod after display is con-
cluded shall be immediately disposed of in a safe way
,for the particular type of fireworks remaining,
6, Any fireworks that ascend in a flat spiral motion must
not be fired.
References to these conditions are to be found in;
1. Uniform Fire Code, 1976, Article 12, Sec. 12,101-12,106,
Pages 87-88.
2, Code of Ordinances, City of Denton, Chapter 10, Sec, 10
Page 414,
3, Official Order #3584 of the Commissioner of YnsurLince of
the State of Texas, dated April 19, 1961,
Respectfully,
Robert liagemann
Fire Marshal
4/26/83
CITY of DrENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ! TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
rr~.rlox~al~ uur t
TO: Charlotte Allen, City Secretary
FROii: Robert Hagemann, Fire Marshal 1
DATE: Hay 3, 1983
SUBJECT: Fireworks Display
Our office has received an application for a fireworks display
from Accelerated Christian Education in Lewisville, Texas, to
be conducted at Fouts Field, North Texas State University, on
May 23, 1983,
Attached is a copy of the inspection report. The report revelals
that all safety regulations of both City and State have been
complied with this application, and meet the approval of the
Fire Harshal
As soon as the City Council members give their permission,
we will. issue a permit. for said display.
j~rn-ter-~~.~
lto~ier~ 41 ema ~nri
Fire Iiarshal.
FI RRORKS DISPLAY LOCATION INSPECTION
CITY of DENrON, TJ'XAS 217 % McKi.naey / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TEL6PH0N1: (811)5668
1, If applicant is a person, is he an adult? Yes or No dos
2, Is the person who will handle or supervise the display approved by you as
a competent and experienced pyrotechnic operator, i.f Class A fireworks are
to be used in such display, or is such person approved by you as a compe-
tent adult person, if Class B fireworks only are to be used in such dis-
play? Yes or No, ..Yaa._ -
3, Will such display be in accordance with local ordinances or regulations?
Yes or No,~M _
4, Will such display be in accordance with the rules and regulations set out
in Commissioner of Insurance's Official Order No, 8584, adopted by the
Commissioner of Insurance in his official capacity as State Fire Xarshal?
Yes or No, A
5, Will such display be hazardous to property or dangerous to any person?
Yes or No,
6, Do you apnrove or disapprove the application?-,_Apn Qv~
7, If you anprove the application,is your approval subject to any conditions?
Yes or tJo,-R List Conditions see below_ _
(1) The City Council approves and gives permission for display,
(2) Fireworks not to be stored within City Limits of Denton,
(3) The fireworks be delivered to location of display on the day of the
event,
(4) Follow guidelines set forth by the Commissioner of Insurance Official
Order 8584 (copy attached),
(5) Any fireworks that remain unf'i.red after display is concluded shall
be immediately disposed of in a safe way for the particulc:r type of
fireworks remaining.
(6) Any fireworks that ascent in a flat spiral motion must not be fired.
References to these conditions are to be found in:
(1) Uniform Fire Code, 1976, Article 12, Sec, 12.101-12,106, page 87-88,
(2) Code of Ordinances, City of Denton, Chnpter 10, Sec, 10-5, page 414,
(3) Official Order 8584 of the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of
Texas, dated April 19, 1961,
'I- /Cti esytaee'tj
big, fur
10e4t 2 1963 6"i/l,"e, - -
Title
Date
OFFICInI ORDER
of the
COhiARSS(ONf t OF INSURANCE
of Ihl
STATO OF T13XAS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
Veto April 19, 1961
Subjoct Conoidorodi
IWIA'S AN1) 110,GULATIONS FOIt TNH: OltANTINC
OF PL;'IMIT:i Foit, ANU THN PIU4SENTATION OF,
IaUWAG DISPLAYS OF~F11WYOAKS
Clonoral remarks aid offidnl acUun takeni
rho Gornmiaulonur of luotuancu, in hill olficiAi eapaetly mi State Fire ~taruhal,
In accordance with the pvoviolono of Article 1725 of the Venal Code of :ho Slalu
of Toxas, horaby adopts thu followinfi rules and re);ulatlunn for the granting of
pormite for, and thn praaenlalioo of, public displays of firoworkdi
Application for Public 1)IsPIrly of Firuworico
V
Application for A permit to maho a public diap)ay of flreworkn muot .a s,.ndo,
for each display, in writing on a form approved by the Statu Fire M'Arshal,
which form muut bo coniplutod in dutall awl tiled Au followat (1) If 0' public
dloplay ill to be conducted In nn incorpormod city, the npplloAtiott m¢rt be. (ilnd
with the Chief of tho iro 1)upartmont ur Ihu Chief Fire 1'rovnntion 0.'Ieer of
the eityl (2) If lha r.,uplay in to be r.unducted collide of llto limito of ar.y inoorp•
oralod city, the application mual be prouonlod to the GI,Aof of the F'ir., 50151irt.
moat or the Chief Fire Prevention Offlcnr of thu county, if tho cuunte to tvltich
tho dloplay Is to bo eoudectod hall tlualf;uated Any poruan Ae Chief of 1'11.a
I)opartment or the Chluf lire Provut,tiun Officer of t1w cotmlvl (3) It Ow dloplay
io to be condnclod in An arun which iti not within tho corpovato Ilmiti :•f a city
and ill not withl,% a county which has doolgnmed a Chief of the Piro L':,arttitont
or a Chief Fire Pruvontion Officer, the application must be Mod wtt the State
F'Ire Marohal at the Slate 13oprd of lnanrancn, Austin, Toxae,
All ouch applicationo must be Accompanlod by the roquirod foe of F't%,- Uollarn
($5,00) and by auruty bond or cortificatu of inuuranco roquirod by Setlion 10 of
Article 1725 of the Tonal Coda of the Stale. of Tuxaa,
Public UfapilLof firewnr i
1. Such dluplay must be conducted in accordance with all local rar:latlono
and In accordance with couditlouu preocrlbed by the offleor grait4ng tlto
application and ohall not exceed two (2) hours in duration,
2. Spectaloru at public dloplays of Oruwovka ahnll be roatralnud L+•:jrnd lines
or harrioro not lone than one heudred (100) fort from tho point a: whist,
ilia firoworka ara dlucharged, unieaa the afflcnr staking the in~rrttftatton
doslgnatou it groator diatanco an a condition of the approval of cr,e applf-
cation.
,
commiisoinnorls Order PALO Two
t 3, Any pormit issued for public display of firowcrt•ka uhdll bn condition
upon tlw exiatunce of fnvorablo womllor cotulittoms at the lima of ilia
propasod distolay, No public display u( fireworks shall be hull If the
wind velocity or oxiuting wombor cunditinma will +tffuol or allur ilia
trajectory or slability of any of tho firuwurkil to be used lit each diep.ay.
44 During the display, at loast two soda,tcid (of at luaot Z•I/Z gallon ea•
parity each) or mlhor uppruvud class A iypu fire ox Iiaguiahe vs or chrzf,•
od garden huseu cumnucWd to a water lino which providuo a eoulinuz
supply of water at uul lose than tilirly (10) 1101111611 pr-tssura, 811111 l,a
kept At as witluly suparated poillul as poosiblo within kiln area in wlu:.h
llse firoworkm am being dimchargad,
li. During the display of fireworks, all firoworka not plaead In posilio.: for
discharge must bu stol•0d At let,sl onu hiindrud (100) (eel from the V'>:nt
of dischargo of the fivuwurkm unlea8 1110 permit p,r,allted pruvidos Ok."Cl •
wise, and mm;t be covered by it iiruprouf tarpaulin or comparable t- s•
torinl. '1'ho o((icur ilrantittl; the permit may allow fireworks to be t.are<i
clusur Iltan ouu lulnilrud (100) foot if he (undo Otat much will not bo h.aaard-
ous to property or duorluru11u to pornune,
6, Prior to a+ld (olluwing o dioplny of (iruwui-}t0, all (iruworlto mtnat L.e
attired undur lucking facililiom, nod must be mlorod 110 that Ihuy wtl, oo
t protoele.d from tho rays of Wllu ouu, heal, amtl m0(uluro. Stich Ilia:: of
atoragu shall be liberally puulud with aigtts containing Iho words ".7.20.
works • No Smokiug11 is lutlera not Was thin (um, (4) InFhoa high.
Moving ilia eouruu of 11t(., diuplay, all. fireworks shall be stored 80 t.•n.I
they will not be accouoiblu to Ole public ❑ar clouer than ouu hmldvu. 1100)
feet to the speclaturo,
7, Fireworks at it dlaplay maul be discharged ill utrict accordance w,::rn
directions and specifieationa of tltu mdumfacUUer,
B. No public diuplay of fireworkm Illtall be hold within nix hundred (601:'; feat
of ally church, humpilal, anylum) or nehoal,
90 At A public diuplay of firoworka, mu firow0irhlt arlleluu tir iU1m10 d -.ll ba
purmitled to eruau over or buret above Will npectalor area or Any
Ing or any public right of way open to ueti during such diuplily,
t
Qualifications of Operator 11andling or Supervising
Public DINplay of 1'il-t1worku
1, The operator in charge of lhe,publie display of hrawovko ahalli
(A) Be roupaamiblu for And have charge Af the diuplay will, ruopuc: to
transporting, uaioading, oloring, pruparing and vatting off al
fireworks, end Iho firing and dinponing of all unfired or da(e<ttve
(dud} firoworka articluu ov items;
(b) Sot All firoworka artieieo or ilr.non at locallonu doulguated by •.2,c
aulhorily havintl juriadicllan mid take into account wind directonn
and velocity prodtct0il for the firing time in ualting (lie firtolt
angle so Thal firaworko Articles or itomm ahnll not be pormit: t d
to cross nr buret above the opuclalor avers, any building, or any
puulie right (If way open to use during ouch dtsplnyi
t CommIssiuuer's Ordur Kayo T'ltruo
1 (c) llu hold rasponsibto fot• acts of 611 persons umhloyutl it' ConstoC•
tlon with all fireworks articlus or itoms for the displny,
Z, If Class A fireworks are to bo includod in the public display, thu porion
hnn(Iliull or supervising the display shall bu an expurloncod pyruteti,r,ic
upormur whu hat) assisted ilk wit loss than thruu (3) public displays tn•
vulvinlt Class A fireworks or who has had a minlni,m) of ono (1) year's
oxperiuncu in tho Armed Sorvices of the Unllod Stator, in which, capacity
he was tuspunsiblo for the handling of explosivua and shells of higher
caliber than pistol owl rifle ammunition.
3, If no Class A fireworks are to be inelucl(id in whole or in part In sac?, dis-
play, ttu pursou handling or aupurvisinlt the display must bu a Corn; etent
adult pureutt '
Wuathor Conditions
)it the ovens lbctt weather condiUonu are uniavorablo for ihu holding of i public
display fur which a permit has been granted, such purmil may be oxton.:ccl to
a futwro date suitable to the applicant, if approved by the officer origma,liy ap•
proving the application,
Yormlts
Any purmit granted for public display of fireworks ahall be conditional }Inn
such iwiplay being conducted in necord,mCe with ttu plan prpsento<l in t:,r ap-
plientiou for permit and ill accordanco with luc,il regulations and in ace: i danco
with the provisions of this Ordur and in accordance with coadhiona pra,tribod
by the officor granting the upplicatiow, The violation of arty ouch condiatnn
shall opurato as an immuilintu sespunuion of such parent.
This Ordur euporsodue Commineionor of Ineurnnceie Official Ordut ?i;. I2270
dated March 15, 1958,
w11,l:inri n; 'liniliilsoN
COMMISSIONER 01P 1NSUO kNCL
Proparud byi
CLAY GO'1''1el
Legal Counsel '
I
I '
PLANNING AND ZONING CCMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
'I'o: Denton City Council
Case No, 2-1566 Date; May 10, 1983
GENL;RAL INFOILMATIUN
Applicant; lionia Badie
2106 Georgetown
Denton, Texas 76201
Status of Applicants Prospective Developer
Requested AcLion: Change in zoning from multi-family
{MF-).) to the pianned development (PL,
classification for office use.
Purpose: Development of a medical office
location: 215 Bonnie Brae Street is located
along the west side of Bonnie Brae
Street beginning approximately 200
feet north of the intersection of
Bonnie Brae and West Oak.
Size: Approximately .98 acre
txisting Land Use: Single family residential
Surrol.indinq Land Use
and zoning: North - Single family residential,
medical offices, vacant! MF
office (O)
South - Leli-Quik Convenience Store,
Multi-family residential,
vacant, electric substation;
Office, General Retail, MP-1,
S-19
East Single family residential,
Keno's Convenience Store,
multi-family residential;
SF-71 NS, MF-1
West - Multi-family residential,
vacar.t, Medical Surgical.
Clinic) Mir'-1 office, General
Retail., commi:rcial.
Land Use intensity: Area is designated as low intensity.
(Z-1566)
Page 2
SPLCTAL, INFORMATION
'.Traffics Bonnie Brae is an improved four (4)
lane secondary arterial.
The City Traffic Lngineer has submit-
ted information (attachment #3)
which indicates that the office devel-
opment as proposed could possibly
generate less traffic than multi-famil},
development as designated at the top
of the scale.
Physical Characterist.icss This property slopes upward towards 4
the west. Vegetation consists of I
trees and grass. A single family
structure exists at the site.
Zoning History; This property was the subject of a
zoning change request in February,
1982. The Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion considered the petition of H. D.
McSween requesting a change in zoning
from multi-family (MIS'-1) to the office
(0) classification. Staff expressed k
concerns about additional office zon-
ing along Bonnie Brae between West Oa;.
and scripture because the area is
designated as low intensity and there
are adjacent single family residences f
that would be impacted. The Planning
and Zoning Commission denied the re-
quest by a vote of 4-3 but the idea
that a PL) for office use may be ac-
ceptable was expressed by some of the
Commissioners.
Applicable Regulationss Parking; One (1) space for every 250
square feet of floor area is required
for medical offices or clinic.
Setbackss Front - 25 feet
u - Side - LO feet
hear - lU feet i
i
Planned development (PD) zoning is
typically a two stage review process.
First, a general lane use concept plan f
is submitted to the Planning and Zon- I
i.ng Commission and the City Council
for approval. Secondly, a specific
~ r
(7,-1566)
Page 3
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
site development plan is submitted for
review and approval, Significant
changes to an approved PD requires
additional review and an amendment to
the original planned development (PD)
only with approval of the Planning and
Zoning Commission and the City Council
ANALYSIS
'The site in this request is locatea in an area designated as low
intensity by the Denton Development Guide. In spite of the low
intensity designation, office, commercial, MY-J., general retail,
single family and neighborhood service zoning anti Jana uses
exist within reasonable proximity to this site, One concern
associated with this request is that approval could set a
precedent and encourage future requests for upzoning along
Bonnie Brae and the emergence of a moderate or high activity
center. Conve.-sely, the block of property fronting the west
side of Bonnie Brae, between oak and Scripture, is zoned
multi-family (M F-1) with the exception of two office tracts.
Office redevelopments could acid diversity to the area if taste-
fully designed and limited in scale and scope. The prospect of
eliminating a cluster of single family residential land uses,
stripping Bonnie Brae, and creating a moderate center are un-
favorable features of thi3 request] providing diversity and de-
creasing the amount of land ioned for additional multi-family
uses could be construed as positive factors.
When originally proposed in 1982, the request for office zoning
at this site war, not submitted in the form of a planned develop-
ment. Staff reported then, and still feels today, that provi-
sions for preservation and protection of existing 1lousi.ng stoCK
in this older neighborhood is an important consideration. Re-
view and approval of the specific nature of a development that
will be adjacent to single family housing is a standard policy
and practice. The petitioner has now submittea a concept plan
in conjunction with a PD zoning request. The concept plan shows
an existing residential structure and a proposed office build-
ing. Indications are that precise plans for redevelopment of
the tract have not been completed. The proposed options are to
recondition and convert the existing single family residence
into an office use, or construct a new 6,480 square foot builc-
ing. The existing structure may serve as a temporary office
site. Twenty-six (26) parking spaces would be required for the
new office building and thirty-two (32) spaces are provided on
the concept plan. There appears to be adequate room for parking
(7,-1566)
Page 4
ANALYSIS (Continued)
in the rear, and, if approved, staff recommends that frontyard
parking be eliminated. t,andscaping and green space are shown
and there is adequate space on the tract to meet minimum setbac+;
standards. screening is proposed in the form of hedges or fenc-
ing along the sideyards. The medical offices north of this site
are one story structures with an attractive architectural style.
If this concept is ap roved, a detailed site plan and architec-
tural renderings should be reviewed to insure compatibility wit::
the existing character of the area before building permits are
issued. The site has major street access and the request is
felt to be within area density/intensity standards. Tile traffic
engineer has reported that a medical. office would generate 466
vehicle tripr3 per day as opposed to a potential 549 trips per
day if developed as multi-family.
The question of what type and how much redevelopment should be
allowed in elder residential areas is one that frequently con-
fronts the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, Ir.
each case there are varying conditions and each request should
be viewed empirically and individually however, there are some
general principles and guidelines to consider. Hirst, the
Development Guide emphatically states that a major policy and
goal is to preserve older residential neighborhoods and protect
existing housing stocks. Approving "piecemeal" redevelopments
and upzoning in older areas could negate any atmosphere of
zoning and land use stability. If the "piecemeal" rezoning
practice is repeated often enough, property owners may place
less emphasis on maintenance in anticipation of future zoning
changes on their tract, This type of speculation and zoning
instability frequently results in few incentives for the upkee
and maintenance of older properties. Total decline and elimi-
nation of individual housing and the overall character of the
neighborhood could be a result.
The argument that a zoning change is justifiable at a poorly
maintained site "because anything new and different would be a„
improvement to the property and the neighborhood" is frequently
used when older neighborhoods are involved. Observations and
experience disproves the theory that "anything new" is automa-
tically and always superior to what exists.
RECOMMENDATION
Approving additicna.l office land use along this section of
Bonnie Brae cou'a set a precedent ghat could impact the future
of existing si.,gle family housing and contribute to the creation
of a moderate dctivi.ty center in an area designated rill low in-
(Z-1566)
Page 5
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
tensity, however, when considering redevelopment of the remain-
ing single family lots along the west side of Bonnie Drae be-
tween Oak and Seripturer the Planning and zoning Commission and
staff felt that the desires and wishes of surrounding property
owners and the neighborhood should be the major determining
factor, Multi-family zoning i- in place and some area residenti
have expressed a preference for well designed offices as oppose''
to additional multi-family development.
The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of
Z-1566, by a vote of 7-Ur with the following conditions:
1. The aevelopment shall conform to all applicable codes and
standards prescribed in the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
building codes, and subdivision regulations.
2. The use of the property shall be limited to one (1) medics'.
office building that shall not exceed two (2) stories in
height,
3. A detailed site development plan, architectural renderings
and/or elevations and landscapin,' which conforms with the
approved concept plan must be submitted and approved by to-
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council before
issuance of building permits.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions,
2. Approve petition without- conditions.
3. Approve petition with additional conditions.
Q. Deny petition.
5. 't'able for future consideration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2, PD concept plan
3, Memorandum from City Traffic Engineer
4. Reply forms total
5. Property owner list
6. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meet•inc; of
April 13, 1983
III
i
1 ~ 1
2
,r
r } ...f. '>w{ Alm" fa
43 l 4- 5 ti c E vw '
dr♦'~'1 1 f t. • ~ '0f i fYa ',r. k ` c ' 4A
Q~.
•l 'l I~r p
a y,~ F K
t! 4, fi~ ~V€ 5 a~ryks,,~~.~(gy~'•r. vy+t r i t
x' A ' 'fi,t(y 00' S ' {
all.
Q
►~ry I ~ ~r ~JOc r.! < 't' r ° r ^ ~rfLq~ F ...w~ .
7i, -..Y ~d~ • V . fd7t `r' ~ iit a
"~`i : ~r r, . ~ . t p • •nta~T '12 rip f yT . J1ijy~
'~Ln d l~ti , r $ ~ p~~5'
~ ii ,r yY•d ~Y yi!tit 1. t ~ 'W.''li°~+t
" r i4a
d1 fi
71 dam' r
r r r 0
t p f t 'rl 1♦ f< r
ki,
~ It r r~ k~,~! w/r.t.
1• 1 f 1.
. . _ _._1_.1..
U ~
t~ f f ' 1
` t
~l'______. ,ft 11~ GSd00 Ca.
N LJO to
VII c4, ~ N
L
M r p1
f
t
1 %
II
II ~ (1
CITY OF DENTON
MF DBA- M1
DATEi April 5, 1983
TO: David Ellison, Development Review Plan.%er
FROM= Koorosh Olyai, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
2C-1566, 215 Bonnie Brae
TRIP (i ENERAT_ION i
Under the present zoning (MF) if the maximum allowable number of
units is developed (40 units,/l acre), the expected trip generation
out of the property can be expected to be 549 trips/day,
The proposed deve.lop)nent, assuming the existing building is no longer
in use will generates
1) General Offices (i£ so used) 82 trips/day
2) Medical Offices (if so used) 486 trips/day
In either case the expected number of trips will be less than the
maximum expected under the present zoning.
PARKIN Regardless of the type of office usage provided parking spaces are
adequate.
If you need additional information, please call,
Koorosh Olyai
KO/yg
I
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1566
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received None Received
~:4jlk _e
41 LF
1 S peml
Sfricklrlnd
Ar'nn i .$ra P fen 26 .1 ~2L_51f 1 on
'7(~Y _ ~rL'PrI)lNC_-A_`plllcr,~ _ '7..52 L/o
10 bonnie ~r~t e In r. 1cL 1'an ~ uy~
- ,1 - L' n-____L.~ ~ t e ' ~C ~ ~ !~:L~r~1J l'N` ry1~l ! ~ _ ' ; i ~~e.t 1 • n ~ ~ •
-TA
WOa&
1`I, js , + 'e l Xim 11 r "s
_ 1 krs P RebbsnS `Tr
_ t la f rc j lilda, , Aj&A 7-A
7.5
Y l rill 3 ~~A M S (=LQ.: ja n
-241 A'Mol 26 20 1,
:R11LIti9t3
Aeri1 13, .1983
Page 2
II, Public Hearings
A,`"z~l^ 56f. This is the petition of Homa Sadie requesting
Fa change in zoning from multi-family (MF-1) to the plan-
ned development (PD) classification for office use at
215 Bonnie Brae Street, The property is more particu-
larly described as lot It Bonnie Brae Addition, and is
located along the west side of Bonnie Brae Street begin-
ning appru:timately 200 feet north of the intersection of
bonnie Brae and West Oak.
Mr, Ellison explained that 18 notices were mailed to
property owners none were returned. He further ex-
plains that in the report under General Information
staff described this as being 2.25 acres in sine when in
actuality it is 0.89 acre tract. With respect to the
traffic it is the opinion of the traffic engineer the
streets are adequate to service the traffic. According
to the traffic engineer under the present zoning (MV) if
the maximum allowable number of units is development (40
units/l acre), the trip generation would be 549 trips
per day. Under the proposed development, assuming the
existing building is no longer in use will generate 280
trips per day for general offices and 486 trips per day
for medical offices. In either case the expected number
of trips will be less than the maximum expected under
the present zoning.
Mr. Ellison said this property went before the Planning
and Zoning Commission for a zoning change in February,
1982 and was denied. He said staff expressed concerns
about additional office zoning along Bonnie Brae between
West Oak and Scripture because the area is designated as
low intensity and there are adjacent single family resi-
dences that would be impacted. He said the idea that a
PD for office use may be acceptable was expressed by
some of the Commissioners.
Homa Badie, petitioner, spoke in favor stating that an
office building is being planned to be put there. On
question he stated it would be a medical, office builaing
with probably not more than two (2) physicians.
No one spoke in opposition to request.
ilinlil~S
April 13, 1903
Page 3
Mr, Ellison further explained the roport stating the
surrounding land use and zoning, tie said the area is
designated as a low intensity area. He said staff did
not receive any written replies, however, we did recoils
a couple of calls whereby surrounding property owners
did indicate they would much rather see some type of
quality office here as opposed to an additional multi-
family (MF) development,
Mr. Ellison said staff has no formal recommendation on
this request at this time but does have three recom-
mended conditions if approved.
Mr. dadie reiterates what he said earlier saying a medi-
cal office building is planned anc he feels it would be
very convenient for the patients.
Chairman closed public hearing.
Commission deliberates. Mr. Sidor made motion to ap-
prove petition of G-1566 with the hollowing conditions
recommended by staff:
1. The development shall conform to all ap'licabl.e
codes and standards prescribed in the City of Uencon
Zoning Ordinance, building codes, and subdivision
regulations.
24 The use of the property shall be limited to one (1)
medical office building that shall not exceed two
(2) stories in height.
3. A detailed site development plan, architectural
renderings and/or elevations and landscaping whim
conforms with the approved concept plan must be sub-
mitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Com-
mission and City Council before issuance of building
permits.
L Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and carried unanimously. (%-0)
Z•IS66/HOMA BADIH
40,
AN ORDINANCE AMUNUING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF UBN-CON,
TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPT'BD AS AN APPBNDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THB CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69.1,
AND AS SAID MAP APPLIH5 TO LO'r ONE, BONNIE DRAB ADDITION, UHNTON
COUNTY TEXASI AND NURH PARTICULARLY UHSCR13BD HB4 0INI AND
U8CLARINtI AN BFBHCT m DATE.
TIM COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF DENTON, TBXAS, HdREBY ORDA1NSt
SECTION 1,
The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the
following described property, to-wit:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in Jenton County, 'Texas, being Lot 1, Bonnie Brae
Addition, located along the west side of Bonnie Brao Street
beginning approximately 200 Coat north of the intersection of
Bonnie Brae and West Oar and known as 215 Bonnie Brao, Denton,
Texas.
Is hereby changed from Multi-Family 'MP-1" District Classifi-
cation Use to Planned Development 'PL" District Classification
and Use under the Comprehensive Lonini Ordinance of the City of
Denton. Texaf, with the following condltions and specificationsr
1. The development shall conform to all applicable
code-a and standards proscribed in the City of Denton
Zoning Ordinance, building codes, and subdivision
regulations,
2, rho use of the property shall be limited to one (l)
modical office building that shall not excood two
(2) stories in height,
S. A detailed site development plan, architectural
renderings and/or elevations and landscaping which
conforms with the approved concept plan must be
submitted and approved by the planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council before issuance of
building pormits,
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, 'roxas, adopted the
14th day of Janunry, 1969, as ,an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Uenton, Texas, under Ordinance No,
69 be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use subiect to the above conditions
and spocifications.
SECTION 11,
'Chat the City Council of the City of Denton, 'Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
Clth- of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other things for the character of thv, district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with .a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encoural;ing the most app roprla to uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Vexas., and its citizens,
SIiCTION Ill,
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
f
hearings having Itioretoforo been hold by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Councll of the City of Uonton, Texas,
after giving duo uotlce theroor.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1983.
MUM C. a : , MAYOR
CITY OF UHNTON, TIMS
ATTH6T
CRAK CO I 18 =uIly-' CT['Y -"caMfy
CITY UP DENTON, THUS
APPROVED AS 'VO LSGAL FURM;
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY AFVQRNHY
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
l
1
. 1
l,.Arir~~iri~~w .P,v.
~9f.d.~ ~
c1u ~ is _ S~~ u ~ t..-~...-~~ .4..-I ~ ~
r a~.i \ a 'i
~ Q ~,r7..__--
n ~
`yt _ -
_
i l~_ ~ ..14 ~ a ,
r -
7~7,ia - ~-----~r. _.iT~..f`.
Vil <<l, l~ tJ
^N
y
r
hl
tl
`
Irk
1~ 1,
J
~ i ~ ~
V4s, 1
PEANNING AND ZONIMG COMMISSION
RI'lCOMMENDATION To TH11; CITY COUNCIL
11101 Denton City Council.
Case No. Z-1575 Rates May 10, 1983
GENLRkL INFOHMATIUN
Applicants, Tom St4ngley
P. U. Box 1492
Denton, Texas 76201
Status of Applicant; owner
kcequested Actions change in zoning from two family (2-c)
classification to planned development
(PD) classification.
Purposes, iteplat of 11,520 square foot lot (60'x
1921) into two separate lots totalling
1001x60' and 60'x921 respectively, ,
single family residence is proposed
for the 1001x60' lot and an exiatiny
single family residence would be main-
tained on the GO'x92' lot if the peti-
tion is approved.
[vocation: Northwest corner of Bolivar and
Crescent,
Existing Laird Uses Single family residential
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family and two family
residential; 2-P
South Single family residential; -F
Lust - Single family residential, two
raulily, Immaculate Conception
Church and Day Care Center; 2_I,
West. - Single family residential, two
family; 2-F
(z-1575)
Page 2
SPf C1A1, INFQRMATION
Physical. Characteristics; 'phis property is ill the 100 year flood
plain, The topography is basically
flag vegetation consists of trees,
grass and weeds.
Public 1,'acilitiesi All streets, utilities and other pub-
lic facilities are in place or avail-
able for extension to this site,
Transportation; Bolivar and Crescent are collector
type streets with adequate capacity to
serve the proposed redevelopment. A
twenty-four (24) foot curb cut is pro-
posed off Cresoent for ingress-egress
for the duplex structure. The plans
for ingress-egress conform to City of
Denton standards. No modifications
are proposed for the existing ten (1C~)
foot gravel drive that serves the
existing single family residence,
STANDARD APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Parking. Two (2) spaces for eac!-, dwelling unit.
for single family and two family de-
velopments.
Area Requirements, A minimum twenty-five (25) foot front-
yard setback is required for standarc;
single family (SP-7) development. 'i'e
petitioner is requesting approval of a
18' building line off Crescent Street
for the proposed structure.
The standard side yard setback re-
quirement is six (6) feet in a single
family (SF-7) zoning district.
('Z-1575)
Page 3
STANDARD APPLICABLE REGULATIONS CONTINUED
Rear Yard Setbaok: Minimum ten (10) foot rear yard is
required and provided on the PD site
plan.
Minimum Lot %lidthi Sixty (60) feet for residential devel-
opment.
Minimum Lot Depths One hundred (lU0) feet for residential
development
Maximum Percentage of
Lot that can be covered
by buildings Forty (40) percent.
ZONING "ISTORY
On January 5, 1983 the Planning and Zoning Commission considered
the petition of Tom Stingley requesting variances of lot width,
lot depth and area requirements of the zoning ordinance for the
purpose of replatting the 60'x192' lot at the northwest corner
of Bolivar and Crescent (Z-1558). This variance request was
submitted in the form of a planned development (PU) zoning and
the petitioner's development plan was to replace a partially
destroyed non-conforming single family structure with a new
duplex structure. Staff expressed concerns about the possible
estaDlish111e1)t of a precedent that would affect recent inquiries
requesting replatting of excess-yard space on lots in older
neighborhoods. some members of the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion commented on the small amount of rear yard area proposed
for the 1001x60' lot and the minutes reflect a general sentiment
that duplex use at this site would be excessive. Z-1558 ;:gas
denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission by a vote of 6-1.
ANALYSIS
The petitioner is requesting approval of a plan that exhibits a
replatting arrangement identical to the original proposal. It
is apparent that his interpretation of the Planning and Zoning
Commission's major objection to the first plan was the fact that
a duplex land use was considered too aense for this property.
(4-1575)
Page 4
ANAIASIS CON'TINU1W
o Klan proposee sing.lo family development
Mr, $tingley's present
on the 100'x60' lot. The situ in this requost was in a on-
siderable state of disrepair .and was extremely unsightly when
the first zoning change peti+.ion was submitted. Recent Inspec-
tions have been conducted and improvements to the condition and
general cleanliness of both the property and the existing single
family residence is substantial. The debri,6 and remains of the
burnt non-conforming structure have been removed. an old stor-
age building or wooden rhea appeared to be ready for removal at
any time.
The present plan shows an approximately 18 foot iront yard set-
back off Crescent Street for the proposed 100' x 60' lot. 'Vile
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended this distance so that
any new structure would line up with the -.,xisting one story
frame house. A ten (10) foot rear yard and ten (10) foot separ-
ation between the proposed residence and lot 2 is shown. A
single family structure totaling 1404.4 square feet is projected.
The proposal is unusual but no significant technical problems
exist, The Planning and zoning Commission received single
family development more favorably than the originally proposed
duplex land use.
RUCOMMENDA'TION
The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the fact. that two
structures existed at this site before the fire occurred is a
practical consideration that cannot be overlooked. The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval of 4-1575, by a vote
of 7-Ur with the following conditions:
1. The property shall be developed and replatted in conformance
with the approved concept plan.
2. The Crescent :street lot shall accommodate a single fancily
dwelling that is of new construction.
3. The existing trame house on the lot fronting on Bolivar can
only be replaced with a single family residence.
4. A chain link or wooden fence shall be erected along the
interior lot line separating the two residences. The house
to be built shall face Crescent Street and will be setback
to a point that is in line with the existing structure or
18 feet trom the front property line.
(Z^1575)
Page 5
RECOMAUNDATION CONTINUED
5, A detailed site plan and architectural elevations and/or
renderings must be approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building I
permit to insure compatibility with the character of the
neighborhood.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions,
2. Approve petition without conditions.
3. Approve petition with auditional conditions.
4, Denyy petition.
5. Pable for future conr,ideration.
ATTACWMIiNTS
1. Aerial
2. PU concept plan
3. Reply forms total
4. Property owner list
5. Planning ana Zoning Commission minutes of April 13, 1983
Ii
Fr/Y'f, I~if.f Ii;A/ 1 ~.~F~+I }r♦~r, ~;I ~i' ~1l 6i r? 1 ! .'i.
bil
n; p
r`.
4 . ! Ilk . • u~ 9 . I Y' r tr' : n
.h ~1 } + 11 t
7 llrl • r 1,
I:f _ t 11 `l1 ~ l1~ t'1 r
I , ' A rY
1 ; 1 r .t! f$M Ir $ N ~ r tl t4.; r
yy 'I 5~
F~l~~yyy. .w « t ~ 1' ~ t QA N lu r T4ZH M fs" l r~ « r S~ A
`+~"~P! . t 'I w Yll i ~ rV Y,t 1 . n( y' ~f
• I
~1 1 ~ 1.~ l' r y rj (t S i6C p} a ~rSr /I~ l
F 1
r
`t~
1 7 ( 1(1 I F"
1 % . ' 1 }r it ~ Y
I 7
1 i
l14~l
5. f Y J" I,~f J`.Y.1 .L i p1
X4,'1 : ~ ~ ' 1 r ~}1 ,IIr '~M r ~ ' lit~r.r1r,14 ~ y 1
0.1
1 t 'I r . v ~'~fftP f " I. I C h 1 I~ c i u~TI b y
Ioa~" r vv r
'iap ~a 1 ,1 o~,Ylyb~' 1 'tI, 111 ~1 >r ' , k~• 1 ` ti ~~~f~r~` : ~ 4
t ti-
l i t
r! r
it _ v ~ " ~ 5 ~'i1 ~ l 5
IAp01 ~ r ,~4~ sl 1 'S . 1A~~~51~
~ I I ~ Vf 1 A •f ~ ! v i 1 r 1 y r i n r.
ty "i ~t }j`r~ Ae~~
a Rl Ic.'I. t 1 ~I r 1 I 1 A 1 Jt ,ti f 9~ 1 Idddd r. 9 tlrl4+~i.'„ b,
f l~ 1j .d{'' ; ~5 k~r 1 ( k' I r~r~ } r n I ~ ~ 1~~'
'J' ,Y.f it ,y } r A ~ l l1 ti 1 v
Vrr1 b~ 1
t
r I 111 9.h t r !t rYrk r rv [•1 1r" ~ ~ ~jf l' ~ 1~
1 " " rrr!
, j _ ~s Ir by ? nY r
c t 1 l 1tI~
pl•
~~(y~, (µf'it ~ ~ 1 '{y~~t ft ode. 14~ ,«.1 t Y"~ ~ y I I `1 ~1~
` yh Y ~S :L, J r - i ~ ~n n♦/1} 4 ~1G` r '9 ~~'IAr:A ,r d'., IyI .,i ..d; «Y ;
•~~Y'•1~y<~~7. jl §Ia.l 4.4'\
. N1. ~ilr l } y~ ~ r., «'fl rP , t I"f
~ ~11yjT l n.~ r' fit' ~~~1 { l! ~ H 1 n' ~nly i rir r y r '
1 ~1~ ~~P "It h'« t C 9111 ~ JI ~1f~1~Y I r ~ 1 ~(.1 ~M}tb' r J~;~t• Rt
Ad
y `(t! r. 3r va k 1 f ft ~,i rS f 1 4 r ~ , rl.; M`Ffi1~+~SN %1,1, '~Qf'!d'~'ml ~{I
! dK +`,.i ~ ` Y,1`lA '1 L o' ? ~ t ri 1!n< Yn, ~t ,j~ i. . ~,'*YS ~ L.rv
,ul 1" f~ 1tc~v~ 1 "~1, u Y ff1,1' ti{ *5' ! 1.
r
qft V; Y r~~ P r bAl+'t' J,~l fRr" , 1 IkP: 1 't I 1 Aft.
b~t67t ),C,~ 771~h 1kip
Ir ~ ~ ti I rrt' S}
LY $7~'7 u.~,.` 1
f
9 lp ~1'r " N r 111 LV„ rl ~ b'.rt 1't,r~
1~ L 1 Y le t r r~l h~ f V" 'Y' r~4 (1~1 i1 kp " Y r ( 1~. ~ ~I ~'~AOftl .111'!
J > 1 p t v ! f ~p~ 1 1U v ~A1 Ko. i
1 1 l S t t'lv 0 4 //h f l 1P k1 L, f~t~ { l 1
} 11 t t~ r!'rl^. 71111 ,.0 15 II ~IT r~ til M i. Fx'V I• ~ E `~J ~r`1 1t1 f aV~~ff'Sf,,i Ir~4~,~~1'?~ ~1 r ~ f
s .1 I
r{ '~;p ' ISM 1 <4 `t pA `Y I♦~ r f
t r ~'t r 1`-.
1 Srd1Y it 7P ~~,yr ~r,^~. ~ iiS ~,n
Y r
if a lel LOCATION MAP
NO "like
•'441,'
! _ glow
srri: ~ ~
l
i
'f
JACK E ~)M D a$TS It. ;a
uupp pppppp t{hre`
~t040E t l4s% Cr EDEONr OR 6r1l u4c
~I
a~
~e ,V9d•5r20'E ,y 192.0 ~---~np,
~ 1 ` n y -~!_~__-_Oawa Dawn ; F
I i ti y
.E ;i. vu+fLE'i <O.J Y"
o»t u!a rE;cD 1 STOgY FRAME
(h'~- .rose ~1 t
SE( P'.DC I oOUILr EHOUSEQ
Eupi+! 9117 ~>8l arms Ue API 3 ~ F n~ !
LOT LOT 2
A4 15!4=
}13 l6PRIVATE E49E MEN71 ~ ~ v
92.0
S89'tvi 19210
CRESCENT ST.
?osel?r BgAciMOMr SURVEY 4-31
I
' V
e
ccN~c
CRESCENT STREET ADDITION
NOVf M9ER 19,1992
aEY~SC~ GEC 15,1982 ~,,,.,t C.1 of the F Ov Oumoaf Sarre A41
OE C.22,r9eZ
1"!'- 4 Lf )!NUn, Donlon 'JUnlt, lt,Jf
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1575
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Mary Garcia Trina Morales
Immaculate conception 1400 Anne
Church Denton, Texas 76201
121.E r N, Elm 387-6346
Denton, Texas
565-1770 Ear'lene & Marion Johnson
1316 Antia
James W, Owens Denton, Texas 76201
2226 N. Locust
Denton, Texas
3B2-2059
Morelle Miller
1811 Bolivar
Denton, Texas
387-7514
Mrs. J. D. Stephens
1401 Bolivar
Denton, Texas 76201
382-0118
TL .
1.S- .x.3319 k_ ~l~llr'r _
/6 j&q o/ 1w r
JeOrt
- `I L 3 ! G• ~fr~r~ 7~. b', Per 1 e _
An I
- 1 13
~7-A-AL' ~'i Odic i
~ ~ Flo ~ , _ ~r..~~ r, ~ s ~ ~
c - -
Ali, 4,1
13o); un r ,Y Ch~.tta i 1,
~1 ~1~ Jfl 11
C~/~I1.S:.GZ.r -
1 1310 I, z
NO Al 'did
~r i..
Uri f- IT
rV~ -
17
blJ,ltiul:U~
April 13, 1983
Page 4
B. Z-1575. This is the petition of Tom Stingley requesting
a change in zoning from two-family (2-F) to the planned
development (PD) classification on an 11,520 square foot
lot which begins at the northwest corner of Bolivar and
Crescent. If approved, the planned development (PD)
would permit the division of the sproperty into two (2)
lots totaling 1001x60' and 601x92 , respectively. A
single family residential land use is proposed for the
100'x6U' lot that would front on Crescent and an exist-
ing single family residence would remain on the 601x92'
lot at the corner of Bolivar and Crescent.
Mr. Ellison states that 20 notices were mailed to prop-
erty ownersa) three reply forms were received in favor,
one was received in opposition.
Tom Stingley, petitioner, explained they have been work-
ing on the property. He said the back lot has been
cleared of the old builainr that did exist on it. He
said a new house is planned. He said it will probably
be a single story frame house. Mr. Juren asked if he
would have any objections to changing the building line,
Me. Stingley replied they want to do whatever it takes.
No one was present to speak in opposition.
Mr. Ellison further explained report stating staff feels
the 15' building line should be increased to 201. He
said this request came before the Planning and Zoning
Commission back in January, 1983 requesting variances of
lot width/lot depth and area requirements of the zoning
ordinance for the purpose of replatting the 60'x'192'
lot. He said staff expressed concerns about the possi-
ble establishment of a precedent that would affect re-
cent inquiries requesting replatting excess yard space
on lots in older neighborhoods. lie said the old build-
ing has been removed from the property. The alterna-
tives'are for, the Planning and Zoning. Commission to
recommend approval of petition with conditions, without
conditions, with additional conditions, denial or table
for future consideration.
Mr. Stingley reiterated what he said earlier stating the
old stucture has been removed from the property, and
that they want to do whatever it taxes.
Chairman closed public hearing.
~ilelutes
Aprii 13, 1983
Page 5
Mr, Sidor commented he does not have any objections in
regard to distances setting a precedent, that they will
just have to take each case as it comes up it it does.
Mr. Sidor made motion to approve petition of Z-1515 with
the following conditionsi
1. The property shall be developed and replatted in
conformance with the approved concept plan.
2. The Crescent Street lot shall accommodate a single
family dwelling that is of new construction.
3. The existing frame house on the lot fronting on
Bolivar can only be replaced with a single family
residence.
4. A chain link or wooden fence shall be erected along
the interior lot line separating the two residences.
The house to be built shall face Crescent Street and
will be setback to a point that is in line with the
oxisting structure or 18 feet from the front prop-
iarty line.
5. A detailed site plan and architectural elevations
and/or renderings must be approved by the planning
and zoning Commission and City Council prior, to
issuance of a building permit to insure compati-
bility with the character of the neighborhood.
Seconded by Mr. Juren and carried unanimously. (7-0)
C. Approval of the final replat of lots 31 4 and 51
block 1, Hillside Addition.
Mr. Ellison explained this petition was considered at
the last planning and zoning Commission meeting, that
the request had a lot of drainage problems. tie said the
zoning is multi-family (MP-1) and the intent of the
replat is to remove lot lines between existing lots 3,
4, and 5. He said the drainage problems have been re-
solved and the Development Review Committee staff recom-
mends approval.
No one was present to speak in favor or opposition.
Chairman closed public hearing.
' Z-I57S/TOM M. ST14GLEY
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING Tim ZONING MAP OF 'rilb CITY OF DENTON
TEXAS, AS SAME, WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE O~
ORDiNA,NCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY URDINA.NCH NO. 69.1,
AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF
80LIVAR AND CRESCENT STREETS, DENTON COUN'T'Y, TEXAS; AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTUN, 'TEXAS, HEREBY URDAXNS.
SECTION 1.
The Zoning Classification and (Ise designation of the
following described property, to-wit;
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the A.
Beaumont Survey, Abstract ,o Sit Denton County, 'T'exas; said
tract being the tract shown by deed to Toni Jester, Trustee as
recorded In Volume 7471 Page 64 of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas; said tract being further described herein by
mates and bounds as follows;
BEGINNING for the southeast corner of the tract being describod
herein at an iron pin found at the Intersection of the north
boundary line of Crtseent Street with the west boundary line of
Bolivar Street at tha southeast corner of said Jester tract;
THENCE south 89057120" west 192.9 feet along. the north boundary
line of Crescent Street to an iron pin found at the southwest
corner of said Jester tract;
THENCE north 60.0 feet to a hackborry tree, the northwest corner
of said Jester tract;
TI(ENCF north 89051120" east 192.0 feet to an Iron pin found in
the west boundary line of Bolivar Street;
THENCE south 60.0 feet to the point of beginning.
is hereby che.nged from Two-Family "Z-F" District Classification
Use to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and use
under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton,
Texas with the following conditions and specifications;
1. The property shall be developed and replatted In
conformance with the approved concept plan.
2. The Crescent Street lot shall accommodate a single
family dwelling that is of new construction.
3. The existing frame house on the lot fronting on
Bolivar can only be replaced with a single family
residence.
4. A chain link or woodon fence shall be eructed along
the interior lot line separating the two residences.
The house to be built shall face Crescent Street
and will be setback to a point that is In line with
the existing structure or eighteen feet (181) from
the front property line.
5. A detailed site plan and architectural elevations
and/or renderings must be approved by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and the City Council prior to
issuance of a building permit to insure compati-
bility with the character of the neighborhood.
Z•157$/l'OM M. ST1NCLBY
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, 'T'exas, adopted the
14th day of January, 4969, as an Append lx to the Code of
Ordinances of the City Of Denton, TOXas, under Ordinance No.
69.1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions
and specifications.
SECTION II.
That the City Council of the Clt, of Denton, Texas, horoby
finds that such change Is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
City of Denton, 'texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other things for the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a viow to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the
maxlmuie bene'it to the City of Denton, Texas,'and its citizens.
ECTION III,
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been hold by the Planning and Zoning
Commis.ilon and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1981.
kTZ'A-AR-D- =,b , eFTCR'I'7U
CITY OF DENTON, TUGS
ATTEST
CIUM ALLEN, u b RMIRT
CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR?I;
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DEN'rON, TFX S
E1'; IZ2
a+ea
-w"~• ' LOCAVON MAP
no acalc
~I ~,t efts
..--~lA14C
~ vAwO
r
J1OR C. ! TOY 0. 1($5'101, JR.
VeII CN !WON UNR Qq 'p (M
TO Ci CON31RVCiLO~70ERfY EIN(
V
N!_'--► N B9•~!T'2o~ E 540
roe 0 ~
A IA' d / C 1` ORAVt~ p,lwr
YIN (LEY 5180 _ 272 / aPJ
glf+wt v5 I'AWA IOOfA 111000
I~ '6 I STORY FRIi
AM p - Y0 BE
BUILT ~I
uPO POSED B+.O G.. I 0 EXISTM
IA Eeu, ^9 0ealro0l a/Ta.le 'NI ~ ~ ~ 0 i
LOT 2
LOT
j ~ ~ 1 I 16'PAIVAYE CA9(NCNf
. , ~ 92.0 r•,~
r------ s 09, 71,10 IV gev f92.o p v1:R
CRE5CENr sr.
dt AtIwAIr ,l/RI/k')' A-31
1
* Y r
• : sc
{ CC, top
i-
4
SCAU top CRESCENT STREET ADDITION
IIOVCMOU" 19,1982
A!VISED 00.13,1982
• 09C 72,e'X2 ce'r9 a COrt of IA! A. 9l7Un19nt SuTVly A•31
Area .+s~ Co, of
,)!neon, OfAlon County, Tot it
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 4, 1983
TO: ~~rrMayor and City Council 0
From: 'CDavid Ellison, Development Review Planne-
Re: Z-1568
Mr. Joy Yarbrough, prospective developer, has submitted the
enclosed site plan for review and approval in conjunction
with PD zoning, The site plan is substandard, therefore,
staff has not been able to conduct an adequate review,
Mr. Yarbrough was counseled and made aware of staff's
problems with the plan. Another plan may be submitted,
but it will be difficult for staff to evaluate it properly
between now and the May 10, 1983 City Council meeting,
DE:ab
Enclosure
i
I 10
:
Now Awj c, id ~
I r`
~ e.wA (?1`rTrc1~;
.41 r ;
%~o i .
J'
.
I i
v
'II II I`_ ~
4# 1
h
i
/ l i i I I \ I
._..f- 14. 11...1 .c tt U_..a 1k ~s_..~ • E... 1___~ j
1 _ Vol v
y., I
I t .I
.
~ i
ucht
~ ' 4 1`~
• ■ ~ 1 i'tiC''re Fi .hJ t'I f.) -'1r'~R, Yi.~~'• h'~~'%ayP .ICI,..`.- 'fi";
r.. !J c71s _ AN ..r
sl
allu
i
'A.
DIY ~ 1 "T'~I K. I( ME.
ul
c- JLYARBROUGH
F%Vw 0 wn.f nA vr"ky ' - Y.(G
. ~ I
1
f
'J I
.
r~
i'
J
~
r S• • \ ~ ~ ~ f`--
{ `L
1
~ ~P ~
I~ ~
•`1 x
~
~ I
i C `a ~ ,
/7CS C'i / .1/
~I
L\~
1
r
' f ' ,
r I
r" J~ ~ i ~ ! ~ r'
.e f
r~
1_ 3 J - - .
[
PLANNING ANO <':ONI.NG CUMMISSION
KE;CUthMENDA`I'IUN TO THE. CITY CUUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No, z-1568 Date: April 5, 1983
GENERAL INFOF&IATION
Applicant: Ann and H. J. Hinton
Hilltop Road
Argyle, Texas 76226
Status of Applicant; Owners
Kequesi.ed Action: Change in zoning from single family
(SF-7) to thi: office (U) classifica-
Cion,
Purpose:
Locution and Size: 702 Sterrunons and 1600 and 1608 Bernard
(two logs beginning at the nor.thwest.:
corner of the I-35 Service [toad and
Bernard SCreet)
Existing Land Use: Single family residential on both 3.Q,ts
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family residential; SF-
South - 1-35 Service Koad
East - Denton Baptist Temple, vacant;
SF'-7, NF-1
West - Single family residential,
commercial; SF-7, C
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as moderate
intensity.
ANALYSIS
't'here are specific development guide policies and practical,
factors associated with this request that would support a rec;,m-
rnendation of approval for office use at this site. Converse 1,
there are often stated concepts, philosophies and policies;. that
would place this request; on the negative side of the rating
:
(G•156~)
Page 2
ANALYSIS CONTINUED
scale because there is an obvious lack of detailed planning.
This property is located in a moderate intensity area. Moderate
intensity areas are projected to at:commodate a mixture of land
uses that are balanced and diverse. The Barnard Street area
from Eagle Drive to I-35 is encountering an increasing amount of
pressure for upzoning and more intense land uses. In recent
weeks, staff has responded to several inquiries that will un-
doubtedly result in petitions for upzoning along Bernard Street.
Although this is a moderate intensity area, there are two major
staff concerns with additional intensity in this area the
ability of Bernard to handle additional traffic, and preserva-
tion and protection of existing housing stock, developments and
redevelopments in fragile residential areas should be closely
scrutinized, well conceived, and subject to detailed site plan
review.
An office use at this location would represent diversity because
none exist in this immediate vicinity. The devolopment guide
noes recommend that high intensity uses provide intensity grada-
tion or buffering when adjacent to existing low density residen-
tial uses, A transition from single family housing to office
does not represent effective intensity gradation, but a request
for office zoning along a major thoroughfare is much morn. con-
servative than one for commercial or retail. A corner site that
abuts 1-35 lessens the possibility of local streets be?.ng se-
verely impacted and utilized for general traffic circulation to
other high intensity developments. There is no way to evaluate
internal circulation patterns without the benefit of site devel-
opment plan.
An office development of considerable size and scale could be
developed on this tract if unrestricted office zoning is ap•.
proved. The residence that fronts on Bernard (1608) appears to
be in superior condition when compared to the one that fronts on
btemmons (702); residential properties to the north and west
together form a well kept cluster of single family housing that
deserves the highest amount of protection. The request for open
office zonin6 does not insure strict site design control that is
associated with a well conceived development. Landscaping, gen-
erous front, side, and rear yarcis, and specific site design
standards that would create an overall development that will be
compatible with sutrounding residences might work at this site
if submitted in the form of a planned development (PD).
011-].568)
Page 3
ANALYSIS CONTINUEU
During its review and evaluation, staff explained the concept :.f
PD zoning to the prospective developer, and subsequently in-
formed the Planning and Zoning Commission that Development Guie
policies could supporr an OH Ice use at this site if specific
development plans were reviewed and approved by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council. Representatives of the pe-
titioners discussed specific development plans with the Planning
and Zoning Commission during the public hearing held on March ,
1983, but there has been a resistance and reluctance to submit
development plans for technical review in conjunction with PD
zoning. The Planning and "honing Commission indicated that an
office use at the subject site would be acceptable if planned
and controlled so as to provide some protection for abutting
single family residences. The Planning and Zoning Commission
also explained that verbal committments to develop a property an
a specific manner does not provide the approving authorities
with necessary guarantees, and planned development ;coning is --ne
only method of controlling the specific nature of a developmec•.t.
it, was further explained that the City of Denton zoning struc-
ture would permit multi-family development or any other per-
mitted land use in an open office zoning district. The reque-t.
was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, however, the
prospective developer was encouraged to come back: with a spec.-
fic plan in conjunction with a planned development (PD) zonin_
request.
The decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission did not
affect the reluctance of the petitioners to choose the planne,_
development (PD) option and an appeal to the City Council was
requested.
SUMARY
This is a ❑Zoderate intensity area and an office use would adc
mixture and diversity to the neighborhood. Traffic planning
could be another positive factor given the site's immediate
access to 1.35 and its corner location. The major problem is
the request for unrestricted office zoning that provides no
opportunity to control the specific nature, scale and scope
of the development as part of an effort to protect adjacent
residences.
(Z-1568)
Page 4
RECUKv1k,NUAT I ON
The Plannin and Zoning Commission recommended denial of Z-1568
by a vote of 5-1 at its meeting of March 9, 1983.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition.
2. Deny petition.
3. Modify to PU and require a site plan,
4. Table for future consideration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. Reply forms total
3. Property owner list
a, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of
March 9, 1983.
r.,,h t..,fll 1' Sii.ri ~1J,.1, t. ; I f\.~~•,• `1. fl ♦jf 1~..~.. +2m.~,\r~i} 7 ,tit ' ir,
r' 71 ~i,} \ , '~•i'ST t'j• " , ll"f. ~A Z...•.lr.. I 1 t'l/~l°ll'r'N~~1 i.~,' t ~ifI
S1 0
'1: ..l•, : 'a ' . . i '1 :r4• ' i ICI . '
ti \ ♦r 1" 'l1 i 1 eje J u 1 1 1 : Y t ;1:77 `4. sl t : a, l l1
f. "l °.tl ! ...-aAl• Ir•. i4 A.l.M+r : tw+. .M,
• c . , I t. f 1, .~11 bd.. r.. ♦ ~ r' I,. n f. "~r F' a 1~«1
\ It ri ' t J w 7 Ir 4~t t i~ • 11,i. V ;y Ark
' ',1 1 'fr a 1 N ~ ' n r 7. r,' l.rci I i \ r • '1 t
7 ~L II ti 1 t•.re
F7f 1
r ' ~ w i. 1 , Il 11+A V ~ • 1. ! \ If
i ky 11 + 1 ;t ' n ily~. ~'1 •I ~ i. li-, 1 ~iy rl\'.
y~ .f F!' r,~ l 1(l l~l rl~+( rfr f\^.. ~:ww«'l.. ,I Ir t1r 1 ~1 Vif 1 t~ .
It/' i. ti f.'~p nY I~+YI 1.. Ir ,L f 1.. +
•'I*`
. . . f M 5 h L .11 I. r 1 , 1 Y'. 1 l rl w.
f • ~ 1 I.~I,{111 11. ~I~♦)` ! 1.41\1. 1 I) 1 } 7 •'Rf ,\~.1
t :H~ `(1, ' ' 4. ~GL~4~. 17 •s\'\I i~' r~ 111' ~Ir 1 ~..Y 'x' 1Y"l 'aT~'~.If +ytia i~.l .1" 1+
~,~•t p 1 , Lend
r. .~1
• I 'y xwY 1 'I 1`I~ r^11 t/jl`+ r' ` ,Mxlti 1` ~I.x 1 • }x I'l r '
ar i ' J41'' j 1 1 , I -40
'I N` ^I j.r1 1 t, ll\ > 'L , , 1:I-1 II ,CwJ•
.I+.' ~ r.' °h^''~` '')y L/ '~1` n) . \ti r'~l , L,r , 1tS 1. t
♦ ~ a`'~pfl{' .l fir. 1 ~~+11 t 1~ p'1. ,v.• 1... 1 n. ~ '
~ I It. r,''' '1 N' ` ri' 1 •t" 1 LO l+r°~ i 1 ~ C r `.v : • 1 l: ~ . f i
~n...~• r• lr `l r,Jl~~ ~ h hl , 1 1 I+ ~ r ' r ~ I t~ JI
t,~ to J II. V Ir• t ♦ li r:y. , 11 ,I> "r.~ 1 µ e n 1 1• ~ a
~~Y r." •'r ~'IJ,rl.fi ynt'~..`,., ~ ~r . ^I:} li 1• I,*r 11 A
z I• ,1„J + 1' lt'~J +1J t y` v'~''+\ t 'f ,15 , ,1
d.l~ 1+' ,w(~Ifa ~l:. T 1.\Vr t, '•l~~sl't\ ~ ,y+ \~I ~ ~ , S
. ~ ' 'r .1 1 6~ j M' 1 . l • + ~ . ~I r ff I'
Aviv,
1 .~...'d. hl fa' l f 1 ,tit a I a
l4\r I ~e\y lr ♦'li Y' i\4 `1~, I,^ , ll ~ :
s
t•
t 4F' w7J rl' J'1 :
yLn' . ''•Ip :`i l~l 'f ,:,~•<`i:'1 1568 4'6 n •l,+ / , ~.1, 1..;.
r i
..,,A.,..,.. ~\.y, 11'M 1°w~•X f;%rf' • 1''+ ~ I\`: t. 4f{''.`
' 4 1l 1 t r l r11 ~i 4aj i+~ r 1''~, f. .~f~ s• , ~ ` '1 .
r't Ir,44;~ J`'t11~.. Y~y + ' 1 'It S 1 1 \ -'.y
• It ' i ryl 11 y.1'. il( tl il,r^ d ' • , ;N 1 ..I ;i 1 f•:iy 'f'<►y~ FJ irl !l -1
• 1, 4 if .1, y.\J 1.~~ 1 1 1 >h '~'\i, y `l Yr ~fy~Y..'
f 4L
14
Al , 1 , 1', t •'1 d ^1 ,tom I 1 -r. '`tv
prvs'any1S \ L,
y~y~y/ 4r x 'ft. ~ o, f. ~a '
o~~ 7t Yi'Kr~ \11 , 1~'q•t 1/r``• '
:r. :•'t't I. ax';r.,, ,ix . .....a •1,'' r.x.. i, A''4 NI • 1, ,
"It
- \ 'i~ • \ 11 . ,I,.. t (1 N . ~,1~11~ .1(~li .',?I{ 1'" + . _t .
...,rrlx L•-•-wy. Wa • rf j• ''ri L: (ra.-.1' 2•I`;f S H,I .r 1 '
' ~ I v1 C.'~'iti ,w,~P i } I1l1 ...1 vya ',LLi .-/4~..1. l,• 1 l ~•3 w~1 l'
Ii1'+•y.l ♦ 'L. i j 14 r. '4 y r i•-... . , rS, r/"v, ,
v
~^r3;1?= YAx.• ~ ~`~i+i♦ ar, ,1:1'i r11fy'~ .i • } i?. \ \.{i, N. + ~ ~ ~ It '.4~ 1 \ / ry 1 \ 1_ ati. •1 ,
,4'• Y' r" ti 1 rye.
l !
It I
~W I, • .,el I .IH I , _ .I n. :'ff ,4 l l l .A 1 \ = .
~ . ~ It ~rr., r .l Ii.= vti
me&* If
,.i \ ~~.~11~~r.. . 'yr'1L~ jf. 1 ,v + I. '~•I 1• MM ~ ; Vr i~w. , I ; I,' , ~ '
y.l }r11I 1 : Ly . of ' a L~ • i. y! _
r L .i:l 1 1•p ~I ,'~7 by Il 4.1;. I~h.1 t . -Ru
If, .4 lr.,~, aryl y'~rar:'..'..1\ ".M^ ~~33••" l•n[1 ~It' •t• ] y'k":,li M1..
a e ' y`V, rr xr ,P 1.f r~'. (r''S~f It * '~r~,~~ rr. f
: r I r.r..Y'°I ••'j,7 i~+.. .•1 ti ♦ r f /1~ t rll;'... ! i j 7 '
y • N. .'I
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FOR6I3
CITY COUNCIL
G-1568
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
J. M. Jones None Received Hone Received
901 Lindsey
Denton, Texas
387-0455
Ann Minton
Route 1, Box 242A
Argyle, Tx 76226
565-2194
Joe Be1ew
Box 11.88
Denton, Texas
387-1700
i c .,q
_rtL C12LSL1L! _ i~l'~ 1f rl ~ f• "~1 /n
4
get Lihi~el
/
3 „r p~ c .
4' 90~
fit,
,
6 +p ~Sr nH
• S' ~ l r' hl hle It 'v r ~.l . /~l ~ n
3 1 1 q14 1_. 'x,1<nrT Xitilt ba la„a ( A
!r
rl~ 4
lrlr' , j
_ rn ~ •J^ ~.>~.,r,',_~ 2 1. 1I,;1.iP.,l.L.r_ ~'z' ~,F
+ .VI
l ~ ~
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 9, 1983
Page 8
8. Maximum number of fourplex units shall be sixty (A,,0),
9. Maximum number of duplex units shall be fifty-six (56).
10. Single family development shall be permitted on any
property designated for duplex use without an amerd-
ment to the PD ordinance; duplexes shall be ppermieted
on any. property designated for fourplex (MF ) use
without an amendment to the approved PD ordinance.
11. That a sidewalk shall be constructed in the ri$ht-
of-way along the south side of Windsor, beginning at
the southwest corner of Windsor and Stuart and e-
,<,.-end-ing west along Windsor for a distance equivalent :o
that of the frontage of a 4.026 acre greenbelt area
adjacent and north of Windsor Drive (approximately 430
feet0from Stuart Road to western boundary). The side-
walk shall be constructed in accordance with City ,f
Denton subdivision regulations proposed for 1983 adop-
tion and shall be built when 25 percent of the lots in
this planned development are sold.
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried. (6-0)
FD. Z-1568. This is the petition of H. J. and Ann Minton re-
ques i`ng a change in zoning trom single family (S1%-7) to
the office (0) classification on a 0.486 acre tract 1,_~-
cited at 1600 and 1608 Bernard Street and 702 Stemmons.
Mr. Ellison explained request stating that proposal i.s for
straight office zoning, not for a planned deve:lopmemc. He
said that seven notices were mailed to property owners;
one reply form was received in favor, no reply forms were
received in opposition.
Sill Smith said he is attorney representing Mr. Joy
Yarbrough who has a contract to purchase the property con-
tingent on zoning. He said there are two frame house, on
property, one fronting on Bernard Street which would -e-
main as a rent house and one fronting on Stemmons (1-35
service road) which would be added onto to make a sin--'Le
story brick office building to be used as a real esta--
office. fie presented plans showing proposed additions and
photographs of existing houses. Mr. Smith continued ::hat
across Lindsey to northwest is a large commercial bui"
ing; across Bernard to southeast: is the Grace Temple ..ap
tilt Church, and across I-35 is motel and Broken Spoke.
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 9, 1983
Page 9
Fie said that proposal would be an improvement to property
and intended use would be consistent with surrounding bus-
iness uses. He said he understood that there had been no
written objections to request .from adjoining residents.
No one appeared in opposition to request,
Dir. Ellison continued staff report stating that stafe's
major concern is that this is not a PD request, He maid
that proposed use is wore conservative than a commerc;;al
type use and that since property fronts on service rc.,Dd it
is conceivable that Bernard Street and other low intensity
streets would not be imparted as much as if property -was
located in interior portion of Bernard Street. He expres-
sed concern that there is no protection for the clus,:~r of
existing attractive singly family residences, stating, that
staff feels that those remainingg residential dwellin;E
should be considered even thourh no has objected, On
question, he said the concept of a PD was discussed with
Dl r. Yarbrough but apparently he wants to request str.:-ght
zoning. He iurr.her stated that staff is not saying a PD
woui.d be r.ecomp.iended, that site plan would have co be
evalluarad.
Mr. Smith said they are not requesting a PD at this .ime
as it :is ❑ror~j restrictive than office zonir.g, that
are requesting straight office zoning.
Chairman pointed our. that with a PD, the city has mole
control over size of structure. He said it is his feeling
that the people who live in those houses should have some-
body to be concerned about them.
Dlr. Smith pointed out that the property fronts on a major
highway, that residents referred to had opportunity :o
state their views and have not responded. lie said c-at
any office building on the property would have to me_t
city specifications as to size, parking, etc.
cMr. Sidor asked about screening to protect residence.
Nc. Smith anscJered that no screening is proposed, that
they don't reel a brick building would be undesirab:= to
look at.
Dlr. DIeyer quoted from zoning ordinance other less de_ir-~
able uses allowed in straight office zoning. Dlr. Sc:.;.h
suggested amending zoning ordinane to correct that p,.,s-
sibility.
►~linutes
planning and Zoning, Commission
►'larch 9, 1983
Page 10
Mr, Ol.yai referred to lack of control on surroundin,&
streets if office zoning is granted, advising that a 20
stoey oi`fice building could be constructed on the property.
Chair doclared public hearing clo,led.
Ms. May; stated that more control is needeci and moved to
recommend denial of straight office zoning as reques.red in
?.•1568. Seconded by Mr. Escue.
Vote was called; Aye - Cole, Escue, i.aForl--e, Mays, Sidor
Nay - ;laiborne
Motion carried.
E. S-167. This is the petition of the Cumberland Pres'tiy-
l;ex an Children's Home requesting a specific use permit
to allow expansion of the existing children's home at
1304 Bernard Street. The property is approximately
1.7.359 acres in size and begins at the northwest comer
of Bernard and Greenlee.
L Nlr, Ellison explained that intent of sl~ecific use permit
is to legitimize the existing children s home and also
allow them to expand as their master plan projects without
having to address the question of being; a non-confc.ming
use each time a building permit is requested. He said
that 24 notices were mailed to property owners; fou: reply
forms were received in favor, one undecided reply c--,rm was
received, no reply forms were received in opposition,
James Gilbert, representing the Cumberland Children's
dome, stated they (ire ready to proceed with another facil-
ity and when a building permit was requested it was sug-
gested that they apply for a specific use permit. rie said
they would like to be legitimate and are requesting ap-
proval. He s.id they do have a master plan that tney pro-
ceed with as funds are available.
No one appeared in opposition to the t-eques t.
Nr. Ellison continued staff report stating that this has
been determined to be an institutional use which re-, uires
a specific use permit in a single family zoned arel. He
said this was called to their attention and they ar now
requesting a specific use permit to make their use ~on--
forming. It is a legal non-c:ontorming use as it his
existed at this location since 1939. He said that appro-
val of requested zoning would legitimize existing s:ruc-
tunes and would permit new construction and expansLzm,
giving the city control over scope of development. lie
`/e
No,
AN ORDINANCE SbTTING A DA'1'B, 1'1518 AND PLACE ON TOR PROPUSEO
ANNEXATION UP CERTAIN PROPER'T'Y BY THE CI'T'Y OF MINTON, TEXAS, 1.v4
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THB MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE UP SUCH
PUBLIC HEARING,
THE CITY COUNCIL OP 1'118 CITY OF DBNTON IIHRBBI' ORUAI,NS,,
SECTION 1,
On the day of 1983, at o'clocr
at the intersect ott of Jlm r s j-iT-Road and HIMTy~~reek, tn,
City council of the City of DentonI 'Texas will hold a publLL
hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and a.i
heard on the Proposed annexation by the City of Denton, 'T'exas a:
the property described below.
On the day of , 1982, at 7:00 o'clock
in the Clty Loimcil Cham~or-oft e Municipal Building of tns
City of Denton, Texas, tiie City Council will hold a pub1L:
hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and !1-f
heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Ter,as
the following described property, to-wit:
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and bois:l
situated in thn County of Uouton, State of Texas, and being pert
of the W. Davis Survey, Abstract No, 377, G. Moyers Surve:..
Abstract No. 843 and the A. Miller Survey, Abstract No. 887 Lac
being more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as ostoblish,tc
by Ordinance No. 69.40, Tract I, said point lying in east
boundary line of said Davis Survey, said point also being Lt,
inner ell corner of a tract of land conveyed to Dahi t:r
Properties Joint Ventura by dood recorded in Volume 1191, Pa.1t
521, said point also being the northeast corner of a tract
land conveyed to Malcolm M. Long by deed recorded in VoIurne 31;.
Page 389 of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE south 89028'15" west 2359, 92 font to a point for r
corner;
THENCTs north 0005'54" west 6UU,48 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE west 5295.60 foot to a point for a corner in the ea s:
line of Wolfe Road;
THENCE north 0015' east 2664,3S feet along the oast line
Wolfe Road to a point for a corner in the conter of Jim Christ,,.
Road;
THBNCE along the center of Jim Chrlstal Road the Eatlowi1..C..
fourteen courses and distances; (1) north 89°0' east 1531
feet; ( 2) north 88°201 east, 555,0 feat; (3) north 890IU' oast,
944,0 feat; (4) east 511,0 feet; (5) south 8800' oast, 9'1.;'
feet; (6) south 8S°0' east, 316.D feet; (7) east 500,0 feet
the beginning of a curve; (8) southeasterly 80,29 feet al said curve to the right having a radius of 180,40 feet,
cm:
bears, south 77°15'01" east 79,63 feet to a point of tangam: ;
(9) south 64030' east, 368.19 foot to the beginning of a cure;
(10) southeasterly 260,60 feet along said curve to the la
having a radius of 553,02 feet, chord boars, south 7810101" eset
2-1578-PAGE ONTi
258,2 feet to a polnt of tangoney; (11) north 88030' east,
1320.0 feet; (12) north 68940' east, 693,0 foot to the beginning
of a curve; (13) southeasterly 359,08 foot along a curve to the
right having a radius of 1059,69 feet, chord bears, south 82910'
east 337,63 feet to a point of tnngoncy; (14) south 7390' east
200.0 foot to a point for a cornor in the present city limits as
established by Ordinance No. 69.40, Tract I;
THBNCE south along the present city limits a distance of 2985.32
feet to the placo of beginning and containing 491.13 acres of
land, more or lass.
SECTION :1.
The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized
and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be
published once in a aawspopor having general circulation in the
City and in the above described territoryy not more than fort•~
da; s nor les:f than twenty days prior to the date of such publl.:
hearingg, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act
(Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes),
SECTION Ill,
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
following Its passage nd approval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
R °S"1 EFrC RIM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY
1-1578-PAGE TWO
N11CN (OI' PUBLIC 118ARIN(i ON CONTt1MPIJVUU AN% ON
NOTICE Is HBRny alvliN TO ALL INTBRI?STED PURSONS THATi
Tito City of Denton, 'roxas, proposos to institute annexation proceed.
tags to altor the boundary limits of said City to add the following
described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit!
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the
County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the W. Davis Survey,
Abstract No, 377, G. Moyors Survey, Abstract No, 843 and the A. 4tllor
Survey, Abstract No. 887 and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by )rdi•
notice No, 69.40, Tract 1, said point lying in east boundary line of said
Davis Survey, said point also being an inner oil corner of a tract of
land conveyod to Ilanton Properties Joint Venture by dead recorded In
Volume 1191, page 521, said point also being the northeast corner of a
tract of land conveyed to Malcolm M. Long by doed recorded in Volune 389,
Page 389 of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE south 89028115" west 23S9,92 feet to a point for a corner;
THBNCB north 0005'54° west 000.48 foot to a poinr for a corner;
TIIENCU west 5295.60 feet to a point for a corner in the east line of
Wolfe Road;
THENCE north 0015' oast 2664,35 foot along the east line of Wolfe &oad
to a point for a corner in the center of Jim Christal Road;
THENCE along the center of Jim Christal Road the following fourteen
courses and distances: (1) north 8900' east 1530.0 feet; (2) north $3020'
east, S55.0 feat; (3) north 89010' east, 944.0 feet; (4) east 511.0 Beet;
(5) south 8810' east, 90.0 feet; (6) south 6S°0' east, 316,0 feet: (7)
east 500.0 feet to the beginning of a curve; (8) southeasterly 80.3 feet
along said curve to the right having a radius of 180.40 feet, :hord
bears, south 77°15'0'." east 79.63 feet to a point of tangency; (9; :oath
64030' east, 368,19 feet to the boginning of a curve; (10) southeasterly
260.60 feet along said curve to the left having a radius of 553,0: feettt
chord bears, south 78°0'01" east 358.2 feet to a point of tangency: t111
north 88030' east, 1320.0 feet; (12) north 88°40' east, 693,0 feet to the
beginning of a curve; (13) southeasterly 339.08 feet along a curve to the
right having a radius of 1059.69 feet chord bears, south 82010' east
337.63 feet to a point of tangency; (141 south 7300' east 2004 fee: to a
point for a corner in the present city limits as established by Gr'_:nanco
No, 69.40, 'tract T;
THENCE south along the present city limits a distance of 2985,32 feet to
the place of beginning and containing 491,13 acres of land, more or less,
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council :f the
City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1983, at
o'clock at the Intersection oe Jim Christa=oa`f nnii_'~ickory Creic, cur
all persons interested In the above proposed annexation, At sail time
and place all such persons shall have tho right to appear and be aeard,
Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and
matters herein mentioned, will take notice,
A Public Hearing will be hold by and before the City Council :f the
City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1983, at 7:00
o'clock P. in the City CouticiT-Chamber ott the %lun a pal Buila:ng of
the City of Denton, 'T'exas, for all persons interested in the above
proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shai'. have
the right to appoar and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all
persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take
notice.
I
iF RARD U. . 51 VAR f . SfTM'
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
AT'T'EST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, C =YS ECNE +1 RF
N0YICF/Z-L57S-PAGE SOLO
46,
Mtty 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGLNDA 10P)SM
;;uuut,~~rt
Consider Ordinance f'.or Water hate Adjustment duo to
increased i~aw Water Costs from the City of Dallas.
6UMMAKYt
in October 1982, the City of wallas implemented tzew water
rate charges to the City of Denton that, in effect, doub4ed
the rate Denton pays for its raw water in excess of 4.5
MVU. Prior to the October 1982 increase, Denton was paying
a rate of 17.90 per 1,000 gallons. The new rate raised :r,e
charge to 35.59¢ per 11000 gallons,
In addition to the rate increase, the City of Dallas
clanged their billing methodology. Previously, Denton d'~S
billed on an annual basis whereby total annual consumptLon
was reduced by Uenton's 4.5 MGD allocation to arrive at a
billing amount, The bill from Dallas was received at
end of each fiscal year and represented a one time ann,.:al
payment The City of Dallas has changed from t^,is
methodology and now renders bills on a monthly basis. ..he
bills are calculated by multiplying the number of days in
each month by the 4.5 MUD Denton water allocation. Usage
ill excess of this amount is billed to the City of Denton at
the 35.59¢ per 1,000 gallon rate. As a result of tc•,is
change fcom annual to monthly billing, the City of Denton
has already incurred $106,247 of additional costs for >aw
%gater purchases through April 1983. An examination of
projected raw wat^r requirements for the months of tray
through September 19830 indicate that an add itic~a1
$170,567 will be needed to meet the increased raw water
costs. The $1061247 raw water costs incurred during the
first seven months of the fiscal year will be absorbed,
From the revenue side, 35.711 of budgeted water rate revenue
has been collected through the first 6 months of fist.-al
1982-83. 't'his represents approximately $1,373,709 o-F a
total budgeted amount of $3,847,595. Historical trends in
water revenue collections indicate that approximately 38%
of total revenues should be collected through the first 6
months of the fiscal year with the remaining 62% to be
collected over the 6 remaining months.
The $170,567 raw water cost projected increase for the
remaining 5 summer months (May 83- September 83) could be
recouped through an adjustment to the water rates. It is
projected that 1,392,883,800 gFilons of water will be Sold
over the next 5 months. To recover this $170,567 over t;;is
r
20400-1
volume of water, will require an increase of 12V per lr000
gallons, The proposed water rates and water rate ordinance
exhibits are attached, The sales for resale class (W-3-
City of Corinth) will receive no increase since their rates
were prvvionsly adjusted in October 1983 to incorporate the
increased raw water costs,
FISCAL SUMMARY1
Not applicable
ACPIUN RGQUlitUDI
Approve or disapprove subject water rate adjustments
ordinance and declare an effective crate.
RECOMMENDATION I
The Public Utilities Board is scheduled to meet Monday, May
91 1983, to consider the subject rates, The Staff
recommends subject water rate ad3ust•ment ordinance be
approved with an effective date of June lp 1983.
RespectLully,
R.S Nelson
Director of Utilities
6XIiIIJIT I Raw Water Purchase Cost Comparison
it Pi:oposeu Water Aat(:s (2 Mayes)
III Proposed Ordinance
20ii0li-2
EXHIDIT I
RAW WATER PURCHASE COST COMPARISON
May 2, 1983
Gallons Gallons Cost Cost
Produced Purchased @ 180 @ 35,594
(x1000) (x1000) per 1000 per 1000 Difference
let 7 MOB,
ACTUAL _
OCT 1982 281,930 142,430 $25,637 $50,G91 $25,054
NOV 1982 210,218 75,218 13,539 26,770 13,231
DEC 1982 205,610 66,110 111900 23,529 11,629
JAN 1983 203,421, 6;x,921 11,506 22,749 11,243
FEB 1983 192,252 66,252 11,925 23,579 11,654
MAR 1.983 222,055 82,555 14,860 29,381 14,521
APR 1983 242,530 107,530 19,355 38,270 18,915
TOTAL 1,558,016 604,016 $108,722 $214,969 $106,247
Last 5 Mos.
PROJECTED
May 1983 246,620 107,120 $19,282 $381124 $18,842
JUN 1983 311,520 176,520 31,774 62,823 31,049
JUL 1983 418,605 279,105 50,239 99,333 49,094
AUG 1983 373,175 233,675 42,062 83,165 41,103
8 E P 1983 308,275 173,275 31,190 61,669 x0,479
TOTAL 1.,6581195 969,G95 $174,547 $345,114 $170,567
COMBINLD
TOTALS 31216,211 11573,711 $283,269 $560,083 $276,814
2042U/05-03-83/Utility Administration Department
EXHIBIT TT
PROPOSED WATER RATES
Present Proposed
Residential Water Rate (W-1)
Facility Charge $3.00/mo $3.25/mo
Billing Months June-September
0-20,000 gallons $1,10/1000 gals. $1.22/1000 gals.
Above 20,000 $1.30/1000 gals. $1,42/1000 gals.
Billing Months October-May
Volume Charge $1.10/1000 gals. $1.22/1000 gals.
Minimum Charge $5.00/month
Commercial/Industrial Water Rate (W-2)
Facility Charge $6.50/month $7.25/month
Volume Charge $.1.05/1000 gals. $1.17/1000 gals,
Minimum Charge $5.00/month
Sales for Resale (Corinth) W-3
Facility Charge $100/month $110/month
Volume Charc{e $1.19/1000 gals. $1.19/1000 gals.
0252U/1.2
Utility Uper,ation ~W-4)
r'acility Charge $6,50/11ionth $7,25/1110 1nt11
Volume Charge $i.lU/loUU gals. $i. 22/:1.000 gals
Sales to City Accounts ~ld-5)
Facility Charge $6.95/month $7.50/month
Volume Charge $1.10/1000 gals. $1,22/1001) gala.
bales to bteam Generating Plant W-6),
P'acili.r..y Charge
Volume Charge $,25/1060 gals. $.45/1000 gal,.
Fire lines
six Inch $ 7.50/month B.25/month
Lignt Inch $iU,0U/iuolit h $11.00/month
`I
I
I
400L
AN ORDINANCE, AMHNDING CHAPTUR 25, SUCTION 25.60 OF THU CODE, u:t
ORDINANCUS OF THE CITY OF DENTON hXAS PERTAINING TU WAT&J
RATES AND CHARGES AND DECLARING AN w"RTIIIE UATE,
THE COUNCIL. OF THU CITY OF DIINTON, TEXAS, IIEREBY ORUAINS:
SUCTIUN I.
That Chapter 25, Section 25.60 of the Code of ordinances :e
the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended nad shall hereafta;
read as follows:
ARI'ICLH IV WATUR
Section 25.60, Rate Schedule.
'The rates to be charged by the City of Denton for da;n±
services are hereby established as follows:
(a) Residential Users Inside of City Limits (W-1 Rate):
(1) Monthly Rate:
Customer Charge $3.25 per 30 day billing peri
Winter Volume Charge (Oetobor-May)
All consumption 31.22 per 1,000 gallons
Summer Volume Charge (Juno-September)
0.20,000 gallons $1.22 per 1,000 sallons
Above 20,000 gallons $1.42 per 1,000 gallons.
(2) Minlmum Chnrge, $5.00
Commercial Users $8,00
(3) Availability
Residential Service. Applicable for single-
family residential use, Whore less than five
(S) units of a multiple dwelling are served by
a single water service line, the minirnum bill
and the number of gallons in each category
shall be multiplied by the number of family or
housekeeping units.
(4) Payment:
Billing for service hereunder will be at the
net monthly rate, payment of which is due on
or before the due date shown on the
statement. Sections 25.4 and 25.6 of this
Chapter will apply to ser~lico users hav tag
overdue bills.
(b) Commercial and Industrial (h'-2):
(1) Monthly Rate
Customer Charge $7.25 per 30 day billing per::c
Volume Charge $1.17 per 1,000 gallons
(2) Minimum Charge $8.00
(c) Sales for Resole (W-3)t
Customer Chargo 110.00 per 30 day billing perloc
Volume Charge 1:19 per 1,000 gallons
(d) utility operations (W-4)i
Customer Charge $7.25 per SO oay billing period
Volume Charge $1.22 par 1,000 gallons
(o) Sales to City Acconnts (W-5):
Customer Charge 1'.202 per 3oo00ygal onsg period
volume Charge
(f) Sales to steam uonorating Plant (W-b):
volume Charge $0.37 per 1,000 gallons
(g) Fire Service (W-7)i
(1) IRate ndusturialmoestablishment r quiringmmaresitalndby
fire service lino (unmetered) to serve
sprinklers or other private fire-fighting
equipmont shall pay for this service each
month as follows:
For each six-inch Ciro service line 3.25
For each eight-inch fire service line 11.00
2) AvellabIItty:
Each fire service line is not to be used for
any purpose other than fire fighting.
(h) Customers Outside City Limits:
Except for W-3 Rate Customers, customers outside
the city limits shall be charged the appropriate
rat: schedule as listed above multiplied by one
hundred fifteen (1151) percent.
SECTION il.
This ordinance shall become effective on Juno 1, 1983.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
RTd1iATlD 0`- 7 BFlTi1`;- NSA
G1YY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
rrl~llcllrzIr a~~t~r ~rT~ cReTjM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPRO M AS 'rO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CI'T'Y OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
/ PAGE 2
i
PLANNING AND ZONING CM11ISSION
RECOKMENOATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No, Z-1565 Date; April. 5, 1983
GENERAL INFOMATION
Applicant: Dori Poarson
1434 Churchill
Denton, 'T'exas 76201
Status of Applicant: Financial Interest
Requested Action: Change in zoning from a specific use
permit (5-151) for a day care center
to the two family (2-F) classification,
Location and Size: 0.703 acre located along the west side
of Stuart Road approximately 1100 feet
north of the intersection of Stuart
and Windsor.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Vacant, single family resi-
dential, church; Agricultural
(A)) SF--7
South - Vacant, drainage channel,
single family; SF-7, PD-25A
Last - Single family; S."-7
West - Vacant; SF-7
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity.
(z~z565)
Page 2
SPECIAL ZNFOKMATION
Transportation; This site has immediate access to
Stuart Road. Stuart Ro,W is desig-
nated as a secondary arterial and has
adequate capacity to serve this devel-
opment.
Physical Characteristics; The topography is flat and a drainage
channel exists immediately south of
this parcel. Vegetation is trees
along Stuart and grass and weeds.
ZONING HISTORY
Ms, Saundra Jones petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council for a change in zoning from single family
(SE-7) to a specific: use permit (5-151) for a day care center on
December 22, 1980, The request was initially scheduled for
Planning and Zoning Coamiission action on February 4, 1981, how-
ever, consideration sans postponed until Mi-it-ch 4, 1981. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of 5-151
a vote of 6-1 with the following conditions:
1. The number of children to be accommodated is limited to a
maximum of 89 children.
2. Adequate off-street parking shall be provided.
3. Adequate manuevering avea shall be provided in the parkin,;
lot in order to prevent: the necessity of hacking onto Stuart
Road.
4. No detached signs are permitted,
5. The design of the structure shall be consistent with the
rendering submitted.
The City Council approved S-151 at its meeting of April 7, 19:1
with the conditions reconanended by the Planning and Zoning
Conuniss ion.
(Z-1565)
Page 3
ANALYSIS
If approved, this request will represent down-zoning of the sub-
Ject parcel. A day care center is considerably more intense
than two family or duplex land use and staff does not feel that
the proposed change will negatively impact surroundini; proper-
ties. This is a peculiar request when one considers consistent
testimony proclaiming the need for additional sites in residen-
tial areas that will accommodate day care centers. This area is
totally engulfed by diverse residential land uses and is within
a few hundred feet of Strickland Junior High School. If advis-
ing potential day care center developers of residential areas
that would possibly meet Development Guide standards for zoning
approval, staff would consider referring to this site as a model
or example.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this
request but concern was expressed over approving specific use
permits that are not developed within a reasonable period of
time. Some discussion of possibly placing a time limitation on
specific use permits was conducted by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
RLGO,~NEINDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-15 b5
by a vote of 6-0.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition.
2. Deny petition.
3. Modify to PD and require a site plan.
G. Table for future consideration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. Property owner list
3. Reply form total.
4. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of
k1larch 9, 1983.
r to I I-
to I w~? . tR+M . I ~a
! „Ile
I' 1 w r I ! 1 'll' r 1 . ~ V? ~ I f i1" r• ~'11 w'
1 '.~r ~ 'rw a«'.. "iAMU/}.'! 1~wYy.,~ : yl~. r~ i K ~ I~~y, ~ ' rti ! ~ i ! I ':1' (1• r
,1'' 'A k {A ,/T" 1..1 .2 ~ , +I+r 1 r1 y 1 t,1 t !.L.r 1t C.
.IN !f{' Ia11wMM'1 r1 I,f'
>M► 4 r1 [ I. I.tI1r~[. •MII u , I .11r,q~ .r r. ♦ ' , ` t,
F•o'>,+r.,l
r " • 'riYr' r.l I y ..r.w.` l: '^Yr~u ` ."~+u~'' ' '71 , y,~ ..r i'",~ 1 r~' { / _
a 'I ~1i 1r ~ h'1'
1 y.. . 1 '.r IY ~ Ings ROW
~ ; 1~ lt,w!~ K}1 ~~f,h ~ 1 I 1 la V► •J'.~; r, •••1.~
r ' y .~H.. 1 •+1 ♦ f~}rrtY• ~'uo~y 9'~.'!~'I,M n4""~ u~ I.Ir~.~►,N 1" r' 1 YI"L! 1 kM u r . y f 4 _ .
1 T y ~1 i M 41`{•~ C , .1 t yy~'ir
•'1 I►''u• ' r~• ti,, Iu! •Y.,I ~,r 1?..M..~/~, Y .71'jt l V~ ~n l' .1: 'Its w(r I'~
~,..w j,. ~'..I aa ~r ,.I,r i ';1, .S , h'~ .3. , ♦.!a N ,.Y
I~yy „P +i~h:f'C2 nft?.`1''7.`Yy 1 Jr.((L{ 5 1 ~ Irwln ~IYt.M.u.t. '..,y'!Ih{. -0* +k5t ~ ~ . t 3
♦ ulr~'! RT}. W f ~.f. 'l ' ,1, .,.1 it it
• ! }a+ , (rs! a 4t. ~0,> t l i 4 aka'u f I.Ss e I ♦ s.~, '
1 ttoo :II !•.~Wltal„S r yt-;/.CC+J~ t♦>r IN I", In 1•lYr 'h j} P. r 1,r 11:1.:x1 ,!tom'. t.
l a ye7!
' r ai,,wt l'tY J 't I~>M hl~ A ~ I.t \1•\~ ~1. ~ ~ 1 1~.^'~ ~r ' w! 1r"fem. .~+,I....1r~1 ly'Au.r..~ . ~„r rrrw,r•r
u ! r a,', C uS r 1 : `1 / .b S ~ ..r. i 1 1 f 1] •]1
' ' it Yl$fNy{r ref 1,', ,.'~a'1J rr•y;'', ~.t; r//'1` u~'1'.1 I - y~' ~ 'y' ,~`,75\ ,~.r~l. ~1 ~r Af~;~r
i IT~'••\ ~1 1~', r(~.. Yy 1 kr 1 iii r . MI1,7777 r ~..'_11
I .1
u 1lt 1 i F JS~ fl 'vf"''. I "J , +r1 ; r1 I t.aS 7~' ` y~ ,y +f i' 1~1 aune It
+ r 'yn,~'►Fa l 1 Y.{. 11 w, ' !rY /R[uu •~'rV ' • rS u 1 " r .•1 Y ^'•M `S
. t. \ f r~! ti~~,,• 1~,1 ayy 115 rr wJt ~~M '~~•~L~f ~ I..Htti I.~v !f. 7 1~1.r~.. 1 I~ * ; `;~1•~r .T`4j ~ .1
r r r, A Y.,, I ~y L1~+',/ 1 t i 4 k MY }.}I t.' " 14 ~ f. 01.. S' r J , r f I!♦"' 1 'rf ~ ~~III'.f w~l
rya lk.raY Ny.', r ♦ li1 ,}.Y.:.' f i'1. r !'•••'r 1{ 1r rT!: r~_y,, titr.
ol 14
1.' V. ~~aa.....tl~.ya,yq lr .!rya). Nlr,•11i1 ~rY r t'~.• , f) !tf•,t'
.4 ,yR / 1 c \ 1
. !y'r~'~hl ~ 'r. ~ 1 t1~\ t^ .~~I f''f''' s" . ~ ~ ~{!w~ !
.,r 'w n`I i ~ 1 ~ 1 r 1 ~ ter` y j a nl
' ;rf•f r' 1 / a;W;1~.1< 'r3~r `r, r,r ~rN'~, !1. {.':yid
1~,ry:.LY~ r I 1 'fkh1-11ir1 ',,r ' 1.` 11 ~.rrar,Irr~ ~__>~ry'ri',•,we'
' _ 1. , 1, r / . Y I+ aCa fit! r.?~}` •
. f: 154v;
•'>#.f ,a. • , N1 Lr1~1 I, 3.~ C1 `Y-ni, T: w, +r
j1 '4.41 t,. ' Y
' _ .~I' 1 ,1..>." r~l ~".~i ♦J j.4 N•y l,~f~►'.,~AI •~"~M #'t,~~
ot.
iA,al ' I ` . ~}.~a;,,e~,j•\`; ~ Y{'j,~ +1 ' y''~9 ~ l~"t111P ~ '+•~w►r.Y r I \ • .
,I
f J ] ~ ~ T.[ i, 1a { to
" ;s~ , ~ p, tf5u,1 ~ •11~. ,~~ri!rlrfv.r~'•.
tel
Not
r r Y ~ ~ Man~►attan ~ r
^ .1' ~i.. 11 rl Y.. 1 t ,x .'i• It Ml r
do1
}}yy,, 3 ~t1~ rr.1(r~,.,t~ •~f 1 ~ +~{1'', 'y} 4 # }f
+~•.t~~
ty"',^1'; •(:.7•jFr ! Y. r~1. ; I... .}7 ta1,W 7.11 y~ y,.t ~'T ♦Y.
+ l'z," a+Iv,;, q,wyy;A: lx ,.;,~t , , • ,'~`r• •1. _
r, S.,rK fJ~'! r '11 f 1 5! ~ry';
af 1y> L L!.ye \FayF r:af i3~ii! )1+'1 "t! " b0, 1 ~t ^ ,7 tw}. .y. l alt
i♦ }lvi 1'r"1+i 71 '~5 ~.n r('7rF ~y~,,. 1(J 1.~h >f.1~ 1'!! ,~I°'lljµ:~1 .!4.1,5t'4.f.a`a-,V :1, !1 X11 a ter♦..+.
f ✓ , afwt 1,n 1 ,11'~Yr• C•1~,-f , , 7 Y 1, t t 'r _"1 \
,Y, Ue f . ,5 IN ,y r, ~e I,t a~ t \t !f~. .3 r. ~i~ • `G..~ ` 1~r l' ti".
urlr rr
i+Y' t'j; , YtR \ll~ e r ~1' ^ 1 w v > r'{ ~i '1Tn'~'~'`' ♦ ,
LL 1 a,yy 4~-_~2'_•1 4 .ff la'[r Z . ~l`5 ~ e/ fY , at t ~ ~ ~ - t
a A11 ehY +~`~#,V~~rt~t~vFr '~`~~:ti11 1ri1~'~`I§ t.f •~r'4`~r~~yrrf~ f. tif.3 [F vtu lc ytf•~.~ ~\~1 r~~~ . a Vr> '~~~1 ~`V.
/'V i.AI~ 1: t,~2i f 04 4 i! rIr,f'/'.r 1,4' 1 jay 1\'~i'1f`I~h~Mi lr., ~"i!J(~~,r e~kr fN SS r VI M^1 `I a '•,r a'.1
t I y; f `rriajtt. al r 1 .a*" 'ti ,f
t 41f',,a7+f"':'+q!'r~'~'y~d!•!t',\1t{~"i1+1 "'Fia%,.i't`" il~t1Yy !~1;r y, 1x~,If'~~'~• 1 r~' e j1~,.; y ' ' '
y fff y . r, {-7.l a 1 1 1 u J y.SY! ^ ro li`yi `
luy11. ! any! ♦l, '.~,Ar ' ,}f ,41 'A(,t,i 1} •'~rk .Y)y~yy( ~?1; ~Y, P'V ~1,. 11\'
auTrfj 1.
1 r51~. • ,i!Y~,•S i 5♦ h. I~nr;y M~tidkl~,f~•f?i i1 J•#.'~1t'jy4,{ly/~l!,Ir '1q. ~7.'f.1 vy,
r'u .t, t J A ,~Y'9`tirT' ,r :1 .a^~5 In♦ a ..{^]7' r:~ "f Ip; V ~1115y,[i~': r
_lltN t s 1• r , •4.
+ i l' I q{ y}~~ ly . ~e<4e yy >I41r f•~ t• t 2 (f' t (`u,!
'~~'r L r ♦u~. Y fj vr. { ~t !`/.51.'#1, ?t' x+} 7' K^ ri (~,1~ t' r.;, a, S 1 1 . . 4 i~ ~.1 ~,7.
+V • ,1n ••f}~u l'w' ~4t 11 a 1~ ~f. .y f'r `l) tf •i ii , ' y r
,r / { \•a4.,[ r> A ' 1!•aa 1 1 t I +•1'f .d It Y ! u y.;.1.
%
`LEI r+l r t , +JYf !1 r.-•{. Y Y ~Yi,
{ It>A , tt' i'. ak•Ii I~f~1t~ ~ a.~iY~~'F'ir,(rNVff~ '~kfs al,~,li STr •fi l.! ~1 ! 1- u..,,l 1 \ '+i ~P , '
,„f. •d,tl, f. h'u 1'L\,••t s W r• ~'}rl• tiv;' vfY' 4 .fn 1' 1 i ,M: y .1 r
Ir y I'SS?lr'r 1.'lr~✓r~~ Y~yy 'r~I V rI r C~ . 1'.'~♦1y7i "i ~ V'.\ '.w
t rJ t"'~,f y. ~a[. 1 MS.. -r'j"11 f M
%F 4 i!' 14 , ti, •.1'Y'F' . 1~. f I'a, #',1 •n r 1 • u... 11. ♦
yI}
r, 1~'~~ tY N.• Rt ::1 t~l Y'`+{'}. n AWJr.. ,1` .r 1'P t!;~ 5#f+ / lt,. r r } t1 , 1 4~ w
f...v •~.u.+,.
.lot
. 1 -0a\1 11uy• ~fl ytl4i•~ S! WI't~`~~,~..,,.~~•.. 1. ,~,'~'1r i r'\. 1 Ir 1;..` 't 4 ~u~j a ) 5 ,
IY ..1.j 11-jn aFCl jr
L, 1•k'.i.,~ ay { r l l~ f,yal'',~ r T "7a. ~if 7. t151,M i i X rt t, N ~ e ~ ~ ,w i) • "I
,IM ~4`t l1 R~ 1"4 1+1, C1T1'(1-tt+j •~>4 F '3'N.~! K1'.ry `S ,`:,♦1. a r!' , r{'.!yt}If. t•~, `.a`•,~.
71 I l*~F,~1'>'IU af✓_~t .~+i=w t' ! t}t~ ti,'~}'hi ~J ~1U3 t'r~a r It iS~.. y1 r 11 .`a ,;y f A,, y.511. Y3 1C
it
_y 11 N lafl
r ra x>'tll wl•1 1~.M ya,21~((IIu.'.1 i'r\t!>. r 1 ' a ! r; 4~1f~ n~.. Y •t ~,f a. •r Y 1 " r C+,aJ~•
~•!C' f. .".a 11~~1:y rj'4 .5
11 ti •tlya~ r,f• 7,(111`1+!)A U~f t1►~>4'a, Y'~', k.7.'luy, ht+ I--'-
f,;. 1'y~r y T.',:/1 {tIM'•31r~M! y , F'e `A
ra.,.rti}~'Jyr;;`tI.; rrlr5 rl~ I ~f'l ~yrkh°t/11 J s
\ ♦ l 4. y{ r, ?if y.4- 4 r * fi 4 la ti w r^ ♦ S' elf r r , li •J.
t 7 J~ r5'~2y~•► ~1 1rt rl'.Sa a r a ~i ii 1 ! 11'IS
! f '15 I~3 P a la Ili nt~r~iq Tj.• : r~! rcK wr ~1'i.y .v ~:'I t. ~r ~r 1 1':'1' I It
aya a 1 ? . y M a r t l
a VK .t'. .Al h
, t 1 t y1 i' ,r.yyt<t '.11 ,~r jlV Y C{ a
!f„rirjhr vl' ! r s Ji l~ V..
.o,I
{le ,'t 1r.~'',~a''l ;.j~~'}5~ rld1l ,ati.'nl;l!-1.+~y ''M''lr •irl.lr~ ~[}t ti'n#~(,,~~lyb~,,;,~~. r ' yay. ~
\ .
-1alYea, PhW .✓wflWl•t i\M~'+iilhi'tlgvrA' r~., 'yA' t'17. ~1'f y'•"~` t r .
w ! , v r '1 ~~M u1M. +r•a1f y Y I♦ ! :S' I~r•.
low
! r,~ 1 e'i r' w`~ , 4 9S 1 1 1111 I
lolioil,
rti r 1 'T
, r 1 f 11 J I • 71~ 1~ ! i' 1 ti+ t ! t s.r >t~..
1 , ~sfr,h S 1• d'
ql~
1', r r it
/ FIN -Au 4
h~0), ~6 2J f
16 y
ry 11 I ,
1` 1y ,5 .S } Fh rT /"rtiih?
13
r, } J
r f- (A r
Soo , n 6
Si nr P 'Af r r, L, `
0~ ~fRn~A n P/' ~ ~~^C r<~
L)vn:s
I
rlr
A/, v
J 1
-67/ 1S"v `7 ~Sf~n, ~c~ -{fir S, /U,tS;t f
'do3GO
f Al C~,,!}
^'y C
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1565
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UMgCp
Grant Jacobson None Received None Received
Universal Development Corp,
P. 0. Box 2455
Denton, Texas
387-8502
Tom Taylor
801. Sierra
Denton, Texas
382-4381
'Minutes
Planning and Zoning Comraission
March 9, 1983
Page 2
III. Public Hearings
A. Approval of the final replat of lot 1, Triangle Addition,
Mr. Ellison explained this is the accompanying final
replat of the previously approved preliminary replan.
He said that replat meets all requirements of subdivision
regulations and the Development Review Committee recom-
mends approval.
Tim Snider, petitioner, stated that property is presently
zoned and platted so that lie could build apartments, how-
ever, he chooses to sell to individual home owners and is
requesting replat for that purpose, On question, he said
that devei.opment will be comparable to existing quadra-
plexes in area.
No one was present in opposition to request,
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Ns. Mays moved to recommend approval of final replat of
lot 1, Triangle Addition. Seconded by Cdr, Escue and
unanimously carried. (6-0)
Ir
B. Z-1565. This is the petition of dlr. Don Pearson requesting
a change in zoning from a specific use permit (S-151) for
a day care center to the two family (2-F) classification
on a parcel approximately 0.703 acre in size. The prop-
erty is located along the west side of Stuart Road begin-
ning approximately 1100 feet north of the intersection of
Stuart Road and Windsor Drive and is more particularly
described as lot 4, The Village - Phase I.
Mr. Ellison explained request stating that a specific use
permit for a day care center was approved on this property
but use was never developed. lie said that property was
zoned SF-7 at that time. Request is to change zonin from
specitic use permit for day care center to 2-F to al ow
development of two duplexes, property will be platted into
two lots at a later date. He said the surrounding area is
zoned single family and a church is located adjacent to
this property.
Chairman suggested that a time limit be put on approved
specific use permits and if use is not developed within
that time period the zoning would revert back to the zon-
ing which existed at the time the specitic use permit was
Minutes
Planning and Zo(iing Commission
March 9, 1983
Page 3
approved. dstudy session that Planning and Zoning sion.
mr. Ellison continued that 11 notice:; were mailed to prop-
erty owners; three reply forms were received in favor, no
reply forms were received in opposition.
Don Pearson, petitioner, stated that he is not the party
who received the specific use permit for a day care cen-
ter. He said that he plans to plat property into two lots
and build a duplex on each lot, that he feels duplex use
is more desirable than a day care center. He said that
property is separated from single family residential area
to the north by the drainage ditch.
No one appeared in opposition to r:3quest.
Mr, Ellison continued staff report stating that specific
use permit for day care center was approved on March 4,
1981 a vote of t would be less feels
ape
two duup le~,es
requested
P
proven day care center and recommends approval. On ques-
tion, he said that area requirements could be complied
with. On further question, he said it is staff s thinking
that considering today's housing, trends, a duplex has the
same characteristics as a single family dwelling; that it
is actually two single family residences in one attached
unit.
Mr. Pearson offered no rebuttal.
Chair.declared public hearing closed.
Chairman commented that he is going to vote for request
even though he wouldn't vote for 2-F zoning if property
was still zoned single family. He said he voted against
the request for specific use permit,
Mr. Sidor commented that at the time request was approved
for day care center, it was his feeling that property was
not suitable for single family; that he agrees that 2-F
would be a better use than a day care center.
ms. Mays moved to recommend approval of Z-1565. Seconded
by ,Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried. (6-0)
i•liiS .J: JON
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING jtAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS.
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69.11 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES
OF GSTKNOWN
TO
UART
SOT APPROXIMATELY
VILLAGE3 PHASE O I F LObANDo CATEDIIALONGRTHESWEST SIDEBEING
ROAD RTH 3TUARTEROADIAND WT DSORADRIVIIA~ DECLAROING ANOFEFFECTITHE EDATE ION 03
THE COUNCX6 Oe THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS1
SECTION I.
The toning Classification and Use designation Of the f0110wi::7
described property, to-wits
the nCity t and County of Denton, State lying an being
All situated that in certain
approximately 0.705 acre of land, more or less, and being known as
Lot 4, The Village, Phase I located along the west side of Stuart
Road beginning approximately 1100 feet north of the Intersection ;f
Stuart Road and Windsor Drive.
is hereby changed from a Specific Use Permit "9-131" District Classi-
fication Use to Two-Family "2F" District Classification and Use under
the Comprehensive Zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. "ne
Zoning Nap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 141th day of
January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texas under ordinance same
by amended to show such change in District Classification andiUse. e
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby :in s
that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for cr.e
purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Dent:_--),
Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for tGe
character of ' the district and for its peculiae suitability ar
particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the
uses protecting f for human lies, the maximums benefit encouraging
the Cltymoft Den-.-:1,
priate buildings,
Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION TIT.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
after its passage and approval, the required public hearings ha'tzng
heretofore been helc% by the planning and Zoning Commission and -ne
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due no::ce
thereof,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985'
R D , STT
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTL'3'I' i
CHARLOTTE ALLEN,JCIT`L SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORldt
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CI'CY OF 0ENTO117-_TSXA3'-
I1,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RE;COMENDATION TO THE CITY CUUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No. Z-1569 Date: April 19, 1983
GENERAL INFOWMATION
Applicant: John Narsutis
P. 0. Box 50271
Denton, Texns 76201
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from single family
(SF-7) to the two family (2-F) classi-
fication
Location: !Jots 6 and 7, block A in the Richard
Harris subdivision are located
along the east side of Carroll Boule-
vard beginning approximately 80 feet
north of the intersection of Fain and
Carroll Boulevard.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family residential; SF-7
South - Single family, Beaumont
Nursing Home, vacant; SF-7,
S-90, MF-.1
East - Denton Nursing Center, vacant,
First Assembly of God; S-113,
S-6, 2-F
West - Single family, two family;
SF-7, 2-F
Land Use Plan: Area is designated as low intensity.
(21569)
Page 2
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Physical Characteristics: Topography is basically flat and the
vegetation is primarily grass.
Public Facilities: Adequate streets and utilities are
available to serve this site.
Applicable Regulations; Minimum lot width - 60 feet
Minimum lot depth - 100 feet
Front yard setback - 25 feet
Side yard setback - 6 feet
Rear yard setback - 10 feet
Parking - two spaces for each dwelling
r unit
ANALYSIS ~
li
The residential character of this low intensity area has been
+ maintained despite the presence of commercial and institutional
land uses to the west and south. Two family land uses exist
along Denison and two family (2-F) zoning is in place along the
west side of Carroll Boulevard. The Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion generally felt that the request for two family (2-F) zoning
is reasonable and would be compatible with surrounding land uses
and zoning. A maximum of two (2) duplex structures can be ac-
commodated at the site if the zoning change is approved.
RECOKMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Comm'ssion recommends approval of Z-1569
by a vote of 6-1.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition.
2. Deny petition.
3. Modify to PD and require a site plan.
4. Table for future c)nsiaeration.
(z»169)
Page 3
ATTACHb1ENTS
1. Aerial
2. Property owner list
3. Reply corm total
9. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of meeting of
March 23, 1983
TWA
~ at17~4
y +(f' r v ' V
let.
~Ikl
r r r~ 1 If i♦„'I~1 L' r L y rv~•'~f - r -'!•;,1
kd%c a 1~ •Y.
",l• VI r, i
r !'a r Y. 1 i+y', L r~~i ( ~ I~ 't~'!'L'f ~ 1~. ~1~''.L ~F~~ e'~
41
(sw~..Y r pll- a en CAU if \ d,~~'i11P► .1 ~K, LYb..r..,
.4 ON
91
~h. ♦,1. Y1♦ •i, / , )~.t fwfT`~ ' r •A w 1 , I~A1 1F I ',e•',
r t;.~l~~ 'i► ~Tiii Ji,~n If ~ a~. ' , QQ ,~,y,~•ll~~ I
, ab.
;5 ~,+t r y~~v1 y ~1.
I fl t s • I f 'r+""{a. 0 Jr11~:. s L I,Lt )ra k 1r
(;~':}S'.I ^!h 1' Y/ 1 , y l._ , ,r'U~F/ 4 y' ♦1`'!♦ J r/' 4 r`r`-''.~'y: lf'.1 NS,'~.r~
=1 i 7A~y/r i } F~t,•r~' >""_yl y~~I'.'r~~ , 1 1 1!. 4!' 1 ~'1 N,P-
1hplin
bs~ ti t .7tiT i 10 1 ,,p~ .F.II,,4,~,1' .r~7L ~1 ,7 , ..y, '.i rY ''~~\':~{Ih;• .r W' a ~y~► /!f
1{' 11 r, ri@ 1 Lip " ~r :1yk' e ' 9. a r 1
{yw~! ~ rf~+r t ~ y r' yr '!1I'~ir'~~~7,..r' ♦y~~~!L •y`S_> .~'~,I i,~~~rl.,.,~...'• ,~~7? ii.! / aI I, ,~"1 1' 1.'.
M;'S~~ '~'~.~4' (/,y
' ♦ki ,,f.t(A,{+ I} '1,•1~~V S ♦ t M -tip' 7'~{~ ~I(t'.ry,,,.
`I '"'AS\ .)1~<II~' ~~ijft '~I ~ Y ~.I ' 'T,'. ,,,r •,1 } r7 r~~ I I,y~ T'~ f
h
J's, i,'j Ja . ~ {~j ~•r "~'r 'jr~ .~i1a~~ir ~~'`~~*7 qr .t t{~` (/'~~.+~y+ ~y,. ~
, ,f} ♦ ~j~(~ I', Y , v~~I ~ 11~~'Y"~.1. r' 4.~, ~i' \~,'w ~ :ST .~I. .,.1
17.Li~ YID~2< it/i lFl1.','YAI~I! r
VIP
a.4 ;i:,
~a+'1'ti...r• ~e~l. .~:z"'/+e~•! '1 'rr~~' e „ W ~1•~". .~T~
1'<I,I.f. wr i; , '1,:"f.'~R; S•4.~. S ' 1, l'.~',-.t
..;'r' '.j lr t{i ~ ~r 1 ~~J J. j♦~Vr , •.li•'~, l •~,+~V~~f 1'
k.,. .i,4. ~,I. IN1~ "1 q J X f 1\'r 7~r~ •L+y~.I~}..~~ ( ,~i.'.
low.
+ 4 r
N f t „ S~ .
• ~~r afi• ti a,♦ +
. i •y y':r~l 1. ;fir` ' "F+1~rJ:l,. 1` OW ,~..a(~`.~~) *~1♦~1,i'~.~t<~'}yd►'"` r+,, '
......r'• .rteyr. n I l,i , X. T' " w w rTtL~7iYr, ' .1~ .r
1 ,tja, Y,1 t.. ..:'~.Y'.- .1 is k1i,.,S~C ! ~11~{ \
4t A
'Tel
/ zS n~„~<rs, T ~a o
if 6) 1' ~t
•1
_ q 9 )5n 164 76 o•I
l'1 ~J 15` ` n pal',
i R hi
.~tZ.r1_ nrl~,. SG ~taer
4 3 Pq inn X 74l
11 11 J CfArt rth' "~G ~(t 1
fv3 0, 5C,} GP,4
1 l h
=1 q-
16 lJe cc r 1 1 J . 6rQ
Cow cl 6A I
1') zCi r6ll' t 7~ .T. Grten
~E ~ 412 I . C r+ rr I l ' C r t
l;.trrn+l Lid- Lit,d
96 2r I
~ ~ y~ I J 4
Al ~/f~ {1 /1 1 1F~, (J))~/1' -6t) Pee
2 H LI/ , l rt rrn 11 1 ~,J 11 n1
aa f.
13
f( /t1. or 11 1y!.o='L~ _Le'~ . 0 { n l~h n
Asq
"r L1
3 I v % A 1 r
r
t
1 yg
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
2--1569
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Dale J. Graham Ralph & Delia Row
12714 HighMeadow Dr. 2415 Denison
Dallas, Texas 75234 Denton, Texas 76201
(214) 243-0525 387-2942
Henry Schaer
1443 Cheshire
Houston, 'T'exas 77018
(713) 6869971
Loyd J. Green
2400 N. Carroll
Denton, Texas
3824727
Clifford kow
2412 Carroll
Denton, Tx
382-1205
C. A. Lindholm
2416 N. Carroll
Denton, Tx
382-0697
D. L. Row
2420 N. Carroll
Denton, Tx
382-5851
J. B. Welk
2407 Denison
Denton, Tx
387-6210
George rritz
2403 Denison
Denton, Tx
387-1009
Thomas L. Sanders
2317 Denison
Denton,Tx
382-4781
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 23, 1983
Page 5
B. Approval of the final replat of lots 9 and 10, block 1,
Northside Addition.
Mr. Ellison explained that property is located along the
west side of North Locust south of College, property is
zoned office (0) and intent is to remove a lot line to
form one lot. He stated that all requirements have been
met and Development Review Committee recommends approval.
No one was present in favor or in opposition to request,
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval of final replat
of lots 9 and 10, block 1, Northside Addition, Seconded
by t4s. Cole and unanimously carried. (7-0)
C. Approval of the final plat of lot 3, and final replat of
lot 1, block 1, Redman Addition.
Mr. Watkins stated that Development Review Committee
recommends denial consistent with recommendation on
preliminary plat and replat. He further stated that
the City Attorney has advised that tabling does not
constitute action on a final plat.
No one was present in favor or in opposition to request.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
iNlr.. Sidor moved to recommend denial of final plat of
lot 3, and final replat of lot l., block 1, Redman
Addition. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously
carried. (7-0)
D.rZ-1569. This is the petition of John Narsutis requesting
a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to the two
family (2-F") classificaL+on on property located on the
east side of Carroll Bou.~,evard north of Fain Street. The
property is more particularly described as lots 6 and 7,
block A, in the Kichard A. Harris Subdivision.
Mr. Ellison explained request stating that 20 notices were
mailed to property owners; one reply form was received in
favor, tour reply forms were received in opposition.
John Narsutis, petitioner, stated that he recently pur
chased this vacant property in order to build duplexes,
that he has built duplexes in other areas and feels this
area is suited for this use. He said that two nursing
►linutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 23, 1983
Page 6
homes, two churches and the fair grounds exist in this
area as well as other vacant lots. Immediately adjacent
to this property are some small, well kept, single family
homes. He said that single tamily homes are no longer an
economic viability at this location, that they plan to
construct brick veneer duplexes to sell for approximately
$70,000 to $80000, which they feel will be a practical,
economic addition Ito the area and will help protect prop-
erty values. On question, he said he has no definite
plans but envisions single story structures.
Delia kow said she owns property on the west side of
Denison at corner, that she is opposed to duplexes that
close to her property, that most of the houses in area are
single family and she would like area to remain as single
tamily. On question, she said that property has been
vacant about 15 to 20 years, that no single family homes
have been built in the area within the last 5 to 6 years.
Mr. Ellison continued statf report stating, that this is a
low intensity area, that low intensity areas are desig-
nated for single family land use. He said that recent
housing trends indicate that duplexes closely resemble
single tamily houses, that it is questionable whether
these lots would develop as single family and staff does
not feel that duplex use would negatively impact area.
Staff feels 2-F zoning is reasonable and recommends ap-
proval of request. On question, he said that the only way
a condition could be included to restrict to a one story
structure would be to modity to PU and require a site plan.
Mr. Narsutis said that he does not feel proposed use would
jeopardize property values, that he does not think he
would build a two story structure. He said he felt pro-
posal would stabilize land use and would benefit the city
and the land.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Sidor stated that he felt this was best use for the
land, that it would be unlikely that single family housing
would be built across from the nursing home. fie said he
felt proposed use would be compatible with surrounding
area and he moved to recommend approval of Z-1569.
beconded by Ms. iMays and carried. (Mr. Claiborne voted
L.Po" )
1;fir r r J~, ~
38OL/Z-1$69-John Narsutis
j
• .i
NO.
1 AN ORDINANCB AMENDING TUB ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DBNTON, TH:c,~S
A5 SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES O~
` THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1, AND AS SAID XAP
" APPLIES TO CITY LOTS 6 8 7, BLOCK A OF THE RICHARD A, HAU ]S
SUBDIVISION AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN= AND DHCLA.'lI.xG
AN HFPHCTIV DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TBXAB, HEREBY ORDAINSf
SECTION 1.
The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the £olloviag
described property, to-wit:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land located on
the east side of Carroll Boulevard north of Fain Street
beingg Lots No. 6 $ 7, Block A of the Richard A. Harris
Subdivision In the City of Denton, Texas,
is hereby changed from Single-Family "SP-711 District Classifiza-
tion Use to Two-Famlly "2F" District Classification and Use under
the Comprehensive Zoning Ordfnance of the City of Denton Tanis.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th tay
! of January, 19690 as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of :ha
City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinanco No. 69.11 be, and the sa.ae
is hereby amended to show such change in District Classlflcat&-an
i and Use.
j SECTION 11.
} That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, herby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the city of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among o 0 er
things for the character of the district and fo,- its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human Ilves, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and efr -•ct
immediately after its passage and approval, the required publ.c
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the Clty of Denton, Texas,
after giving duo notice thereof.
i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day o° 'RATOR
VAR I ,
CITY OF DE,`7TON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
f CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OOFf DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, we live in a world that makes universal hum.a:n
rights our first priority if civilization is to survive a,uc
advance; and
WHEREAS, a major obstacle to the attainment of univeri,a.:
human rights is the prejudice that manifests itsole in c ,t
persecution of a people for their religious beliefs; and
WHBRHAS, the earth is, in reality, one country and mankie.c
its citizens; and
WHEREAS, we in America have been given great splrIt1rt.l
capacities and blessings;
WHEREAS, we must take the leadership in the quest for 4n
attainment of universal human rights and religious freedom;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF *li1F
CITY OF DENTON, TUAS:
That we, the City Council of Denton, Texas, do her+rv
protest the relentless persecution of individual members of :u.r
universe because of their religious beliefs; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of Dentua.,
Texas enacts this resolution of sympathy and support ,f
religious freedom throughout the world in order that the woc'.c
may f. now our sentiments on this humanitarian Issue,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 191:
KI(MARD U. r ; MTM
CITY 012 DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
UM . , UJIY iIEIAKY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CI'T'Y ATTORNEY
CITY OF DE,NTON, TEXAS z~
BY: Q, ft Y
May 10, 1983
SUBJSCT:
Resolution Authorizing an Agreement Between `texas Municipal
Power Agency and the City of Denton.
SUMMARY=
'T'exas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) has constructed
facilities on City-owned property in order to provide the
interchange and delivery of electrical power to the City of
Denton. 'T'hese facilities consist of the Denton steam or
Spencer 136/69 KV interchange and the 138 KV line from the
Spencer interchange to the ARCO switch station. The
agreement is to protect the rights of the Agency and to
preserve its interest and title to the facilities.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council Approval or disapproval of subject Resolution &
Agreement.
ALTERNATIVES:
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION i
The Staff recommends approval of subject Resolution &
Agreement.
Respectfully,
1X C- l
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Resolution
II Agreement (TMPA)
20430
R U S O L U T 1 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C iY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of t~je
City of Denton, Texas an-agreement between the City of Denaaa
and the Texas Municipal, Power .agency, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION IT.
This Resoluton shall become effective from and after its
date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 10th day of May, 1983.
RLULARD r: , MAYU
R
CITY OF DFNTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
(N-LARLOM ALL 6rbMffTM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTO,N, TEXAS
BY:
a..~...i. .le_..r.v..a'~..aw.....~uu.~......G:K"'1'~.!~.+w.`•~+...e..~e.C7.'~"~."'!:......~~Y.i..:'~:T.'.~'r'!...~:~'!a.~L~"".~.:
ACRBBkIiNT UGARDiNO IMPROVEMIINTS
5PTUX , MUNIUIVAI, t3WNTU-TiMi
That the City of Denton, a municipal corporation herein by
and through its Mayor, of the County of Denton, Texas herein-
after called "City" for and in consideration of the sum of Tan
and No/100 Dollars and other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, and
these presents does grant unto the Texas Municipal Power Agency,
a political subdivision of the State of 'Texas, hereinafter
called "Agency", its successors and assigns, the right co
ownership and title of any and all electric facilities ar.c
improvements which have been and shall be placed by Agency on
any land owned by the City and shall not go with or become a
part of said land, provided, however, that the City shall nave,
the right upon expiration of the term hereof, to remove, it
Agency's expense, such electric facilities then remaining on tie
above described land,
The rights hereby granted to agency shall remain in forte
for the same term as the Power Salus Contract on file with City
dated September 1, 1976 between City and Agency,
Witness the hand and seal of the City of Denton, Texas, th,;
10th day of %lay, 1983,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
L U, S '4r , J U
ATTEST:
c lAR O ALLEN , --GTTT S: 1•IAR1
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOR?I;
C. J. TAYLOR, .IR., CITY A'rl•ORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: r ~T~
r
,
Serviog the cities of Bryan, Denton, Oariand 6 Greenville.
April 19, 1983
,It', C, J. Taylor, Jr„ City Attorney
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Rai Rule of Realty Agreement
Door Hr. Tayiori
The following TMPA electrical facilities have been constructed on
property owned by the City of Denton:
Description of City
Facility (T'MPA owned equipment Location _ Prooerty
Denton Steam 138/69 kV Substation Denton Denton's Spencer Power
Planti Land owned by
Denton
Denton Steam-Arco 138 kV Line Denton Easements obtained by
and in the name of the
City of Denton, some
property may be owned
In foe by Denton
In order to protect the rights of TMPA and to preserve its interest and
title to these and any other future similar improvements so constructed,
the attached agreement is submitted for your review, approval and
execution,
The agreement, we feel, is adequate for this purposel however, should y..n
have questions, will you please advise,
Sincor~aly,
Lee Uititing
Ma it
Land Acquisition/Property Management
LD:hsl
Attachment r5; t
cc: Frank H. Bass, Jr„ THPA
Charles J. Eakins, TMPA APR 21 198
CITY of WINN
UGAL DEPT.
Tr.ne alvniolp el Pewer Rgrsry P.0. Dow 570 Anderson, Teias 77830.0570 .9' 073.2165
a
May 10, 19£33
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
The residents in and around the City of Argyle are proposing
to create a Municipal Utility District (MUD) to provide sewer
service. The service territory will generally cover the -'4ty
of Argyle and certain areas between the City of Denton mnd
Argyle. Some of such area w11.1 be within Den tc}n's
extraterritorial jurisdiction, wherein Denton has a
Certificate of Convenience and Necessity from the Puclic
Utility Commission to provide sewer service, They prop,.-zed
Municipal Utility District plans to extend a gravity s^:wer
line to the new hickory Creek sewer line.
The Staff supports the creation of such a Municipal Utii:ity
District to heip solve a wastewater problem in the area, The
Staff would request that the Municipal Utility District be
financially structured so that the facilities being instated
could be deeded to the City at such time as the area is
annexed into the City of Denton, and the residents request the
City to assume the responsibility for operating and
maintaining the system. jPhe Staff would also request that the
facilities generally meet City construction standards so :hat
future operation and maintenance be compatible with the
remainder of the City's sewer system. Representatives of the
Argyle Municipal Utility District will be in attendance at the
Council meeting to discuss details of the proposed Nlunic~pal
Utility District.
FISCAL BUMMARYi
Not applicaule
ACTION REQUIRED;
Approval of a Resolution giving approval and consent for the
creation of a Municipal. Utility District within Dento n's
extraterritorial jurisdiction.
RECOMMr1NDAT1ON f
The Staff recommends approval of the Resolution giving
approval and consent for the creation of an Argyle Municipal
Utility District.
Respectfully,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Proposed District Boundary- argyle Municipal Utility
District
II A Bill to Be Entitled An Act
III Proposed Resolution
IV Certification of City Secretary
204 OU-3
PROPOSED
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
ARGYLE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Beginning at a point in the center,ine of a public road known as Cottonwooa
Road, said point of beginning also being the Southwest corner of the S.A.
Chambers Survey, Abstract 308, Denton County, Texas;
Thence East along the South line of the S,A, Chambers Survey, A-3081 688.;
feet to a point in the East right-of-way line of U .S, Highway No, 377;
Thence North 10° 47' East along the East right-of-way line of U,S, Highway
No. 377 1,596 feet to a point of curvature;
Thence in a northerly direction along the East right-of-way and along
curve to the left, having a radius of 6795,1 feet and a central angle of 01'
30' 14", a distance of 890 feet more or less to a point in the eas;
right-of-way line of U.S, Highway No. 377, said point also being on trr~
centerline of F X Highway 1172;
Y^rnce North 89° 44' East along the centerline of said F.M, Highway 1172 x
distance of 3,789 feet to a point in the centerline of F.M. Highway 1172;
Thence North along the West line-as fenced of Tract No. 6 of the W.C..
Or it 's Subdivision in the S.A. Chambers Survey, A-3081 a plat of sai,;
subdivision filed February 28, 1920, Volume 1, Page 10, Denton County Records,
a distance of 1,655 feet to a point, and said point being the Northeast corne^
of Tract No, 3 of the previous mentioned W.C. Orr 's Subdivision;
Thence West along the North line of Tract No, 3 in the W.C. Orr';
Subdivision a distance of 25808 feet to a point;
Thence North a distance of 223 feet to a point;
Thence West a distance of 976 feet more or less to a point in the Easa
right-of-way line of U,S. Highway No. 377;
Thence in a northerly direction along the East right-of-way line of U.5_
Highway 377 and along a curve to the right, having a radius of 3,282.7 feet ar:
a central angle of 21° 24' a distance of 1,226.09 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence North 17° 53' East along East right-of-way line of U.S. Highway `lo.
377 a distance of 410 feet to a point;
Thence South 88° 48' East along an occupied property line a distance
897.8 feet to a point;
-1 04/1•
t
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the creation, administration, powers, duties,
functions, operations, and financing of the Argyle Municipal
Utility District.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. CREATION OF DISTRICT, Pursuant to
Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas Constitution, a
conservation and reclamation district is created in Denton
County to be known as "Argyle Municipal Utility District",
hereinafter called the "District", which shall be a governmental
agency, a political subdivision of the state, and a body
politic and corporate. The creation of the District is
declared to be essential to the accomplishment of the purposes
of Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas Constitution.
iM SECTION 2. BOUNDARIES. (a) The District shall
inc.Owde all that certain territory in Denton County, Texas
located within the following described boundaries, to wit:
Sell 1nnlna At a DOIlit in 04 Cool e, ll no 0( a 0uol lc road tn0.h at COtton.ood
0010, said Mint of of9lnhleg Alto of lop ln$ Souln.ott Co1ne1 Of she S.A.
(h,, l Surrey, lbst14et )06, Denton C4017, tlA46c
indite Clst 11069 and South line of the S.A. Ch A+bles Surre), A.M. 668.4
feel to a Oolnl In lie Call fight-of-.4y line of D.S. 419nvay V, a));
Thence North its, el' ell along the cast H941-01--ay line of U.S, 411h.9y
la. 5,596 feet to 1 rolot or eur."ure;
(hence in a mOrtOVly direct 106 liong she 3411 right-of-.4y did 11009 A
hr.e to the left, hi nq a gisul of 619S.2 feet N4 4 Cent,41 Angle of 01'
30' 11', 1 61114"1 Of 990 feel rare le lets so 1 Polls In the !Act
r,9h t•of.ral Ilme 4r U.S. Nlgnwy M1. ))l, SAW oo,ot also of-Al X the
d+leltlnf or f, rt. 419h.4y II12;
theme North 69' 44' 2111 along ilia centers lie of lard f.M. nagn.l) 1112 I
dlsUnCa Of ),219 feet to 1 Wit In I" ctnterllne or 01.14. Nlgn Ay 2:72,
mince North 11on0 the last line At failed 01 tract No. 6 of lie O.C.
or,'S SObdii IJ10A In the S.A. Ch erofra S,"Oy, A.M. A 0111 of slid
tubAl,iiion filed feoruary f6, 1910. Poly o 1, Pape W. DehuO 0unly tec0'-dl,
a d,st Ante of 161s feel to A 00161, 104 Said mint Wig tee ho11'l.st wrier
V out No. ) Of the Drell", >enud6ed U.C. ow$ Suo 01r,11dn;
Toole Neu along the Nvlh line OF !fact h0. ) In the A ( rr•t
Su1541+,SIOn A distance It 1.106 feet to 1 Collis;
TPt,j, 10,(1 1 OiStaKe of 21) (fit 10 4 00100;
Twit Wit a dlst4Ke o1 916 401( V1a 01 lest t) a point In Ine Cast
.Ignt•Ofway Ior of 0.S 419h.ay n4 U);
lhener In 1 nu,tne,ly clef:td, 41ohg the Ent r,ghL.Or..Jy 11nr U :.S
ni9n4y ))I Iro Aloha 1 cube to the r' lit, oar ,nq 1 ryOIW of ),192 f reet a~7
1 tooars 1 angle of 25' 2a• a 611140 to oy 1,226.09 feet to f DOlnt of twgenty;
,nand North if' S)' (lit along fill elgnt.0f..ly line Of V.S. hlahrlr V .
)11 A dlStiNe of 410 fell 10 1 Wifit:
thence South 66' a6' [lit along H 4atu01H 0rooAlty line a diatiof of
691.6 lees to 1 Dolol;
Thence North 01° 12' East along an occupied property line a distance ar
336.34 feet to a point;
Thence North 88° 48' West along an occupied pro arty line a distance ufi
798.39 feet more or less to a point in the East r ght-of-way line of U.',
Highway No. 377;
Thence North 17° 53' East along the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highoy,i,
No. 377 a distance of 580 feet to a point;
Thence North 23° 36' East along the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highwa.~
No. 377 a distance of 200.8 feet to a point;
Thence North 17° 53' East along the East right-of-way line of U.S. Highwa.
No. 377 a distance of 714.6 feet to a point;
Thence South 89° 49' East along an occupied property line a distance ;r
11552.27 feet to a point;
Thence North 00° 21' 16" West along an occupied property line a distar,:i
of 979.14 feet, to a point;
Thence North 81° 40' 11" West along an occupied property line a distar,:;
of 750.24 feet to a point;
Thence North 000~ 43' 13" West 420 feet more or less to a point in ,r
South boundary line of Argyle Original'Townsite as shown by plat recorded n
Denton County, Texas records;
Thence East along the South boundary line of the Argyle Original Tounsi:e
1,120 feet more or less to a point in the East boundary line of the Argy'r
Original Townsite;
Thence East along the South right-of-way line of a public road known
Hickory Hill Road a distance of 720 foet to a point;
Thence North 01.° 30' East along an occupied property line a distance
450 feet to a point;
Thence West along an occupied property line a distance of 560 feet more a--
less to a point in the East boundary line of Argyle Original Townsite;
Thence North 19° 00' East along the East boundary line of the Argy
Original Townsite a distance of 503 feet to a point in the North boundary lane
of the Argyle Original Townsite, said point also being the Northeast corner ;f
the Argyle Original Townsite dnd on the South boundary line of the Jes: - e
Gazaway Survey, A-481, Denton County, Texas;
Thence North 88° 38' East along the South boundary line of Jessie Gazaw-z.v
Survey, A-481, a distance of 923 feet more or less to the Southeast corner of
said Gazaway Survey;
Thence North along the East boundary line of said Jessie Gazaway Survey a
distance of 493 feet to a point;
-2-
1 Thence North 89° 43' West along an occupied property line 912 feet more or
less to a fence corner;
Thence North 01° 24' East along an occupied property line 611 feet to a
fence corner;
Thence North 87° 27' West along an occupied property line 850 feet more or
less to a fence corner in the East right-of-way line of UIS. Highway No. 377;
Thence North 55° 38' East along the South right-of-way line of a public
road known as Country Club Road, a distance of 7,600 feet more or less to a
point, said point being the Southwest corner of Fairway Acres Subdivision as
recorded in Renton County, Texas records;
Thence South 88° 43' East along a South line of Fairway Acres Subdivision
a distance of 2,366.5 feet to a point, said point also being on the Test
boundary line of the H, McMurray Survey, A-956, Denton County, Texas;
Thence North 01° 29' East along the West boundary of said McMurray Survey
a distance of 1,301.2 feet more or less to the North boundary line of H.
McMurray Survey, A-956;
Tnence South 88° 08' East along the North boundary line of said McMurray
survr.ja distance of 969.0 feet to a point;
Thence North 01° 20' East a distance of 158.56 feet to a point;
Thence North 85° 01' East a distance of 63515 feet to a point, said point
being in the West right-of-way line of F X Road 1830;
Thence northerly along West right-of-way line of FX Road 1830 on a curve
to the right having a radius of 4,350 feet and a central angle of 20° 03' 3911 a
distance of 1,523.06 feet more or less, to a point in the North right-of-way
line of a public road known as Country Club Road;
Thence South 59° 06' West along the North right-of-way line of County Club
Road a distance of 4,319 feet to a point;
Thence South 57° 28' West along the North right-of-way line of Country
Club Road a distance of 1,050,8 feet to a point;
Thence South 55° 38' West along the North right-of-way line of Country
Club Road a distance of 7,600 feet more or less to a point in the East
right-of-way line of UIS, Highway No, 377;
Thence North 62° 00' West a distance of 320 feet to the West right-of-way
line of the Texas-Pacific Railroad;
Thence South 28° 00' West along the West right-of-way line of Texas-
Pacific Railroad a distance of 1,260 feet more or less to a point on the North
boundary line of Argyle Original Townsite plat;
3-
1 '
Thence North 71° 00' West along the North boundary line of Argyle Original
Townsite a distance of 320 feet more or less to the Northwest corner of
Original Townsite boundary;
Thence North 03° 06' East a distance of 199 feet to the Northeast corner
of the LI White Survey, A-1384, Denton County, Texas;
Thence West along North boundary line of the LI White Survey, A-1384 a
distance of 690 feet to a point;
Thence South 10° West a distance of 395 feet to a point;
Thence South 88° 39' East a distance of 660.08 feet more or less to the
West boundary line of the Argyle Original Townsite;
Thence South 19° West along the West boundary line of Argyle Original
Townsite a distance of 1,045 feet to a point;
Thence South 89° 35' West along an occupied property line a distance of
1,100 feet to a point;
Thence South 77° 30' West along an occupied property line 365 feet to a
point;
Thence South 76° 42' West along an occupied property line 840 feet more or
less to the West boundary line of the L. Write Survey, A-1384, Denton County,
Texas;
Thence South along the West boundary line of the L. White Survey, A-13+4,
a distance of 200 feet to a point;
Thence South 88° 48' West along an occupied property line 1,890 feet to a
point;
Thence South along an occupied property line, 900 feet more or less to the
North right-of-way line of a public road known as Old Justin Road;
Thence South 88° 48' West along the North right-of-way line of Old Justin
Road a distance of 210 feet to a point;
Thence South across Old Justin Road and along an occupied property line
a distance of 1,790 feet more or less to a fence corner;
Thence North 88° 48' East along an occupied property line a distance of
540 feet more or less to a fence corner;
Thence North along the occupied property line a distance of 858 feet t.) a
fence corner;
Thence- North 88° 48' East along an occupied property line 285 feet to a
fence corner;
-4-
~I
I
1
Thence North along an occupied property line 890 feet more or less to the
South right-of- way line of Old Justin Road;
Thence North 88°48' East along the South right-of-way line of old Justin
Road a distance of 260 feet more or less to the Northwest corner of Tanglewood
Mobile Home Park;
Thence South 00° 12' East a distance of 895,5 feet to a point;
Thence South 89° 03' East a distance of 1,067.2 feet more or less to a
point being the Southeast corner of Tanglewood Mobile Home Park;
Thence North 00° 061 West along the East line of Tanglewood Mobile Home
Park a distance of 888,0 feet more or less to a point in the South right-of-way
line of Old Justin Road, said point also being the Northeast corner of
Tanlgewood Mobile Home Park;
Thence North 88° 48' East along the South right-of-way line of Old Justin
Road 30 feet more or less to a point intersecting the East right-of-way line of
Old Justin Road;
Thence North along the East right-of-way line of Old Justin Road a
distance of 728 feet more or less to a point intersecting the South
rior,C-of-way line of Old Justin Road;
Inence North 76° 42' East along the South right-of-way line of Old Justin
Road a distance of 848, feet to a point;
Thence North 77° 30' East along the South right-of-way line of Old Justin
Road 354 feet to a point;
Thence North 89° 35' East along the South right-of-way line of Old Justin
Road 417 feet to a point;
Thence South 00° 22' West along an occupied property line a distance of
156 feet to a fence corner;
Thence South 85° 411 East along an occupied property line a distance of
214 feet to a fence corner;
Thence North 06° 451 East along an occupied property line a distance of
174.5 feet more or less to the South right-of-way line of Old Justin Road;
Thence North 89° 351 East along the South right-of-way line of Old Justin
Road, a distance of 670 feet more or less to the West right-of-way line of the
Texas-Pacific Railroad;
Thence South 17° 241 25" West along the West right-of-way line of the
Texas-Pacific Railroad a distance of 3,379,19 feet more or less to a point in
the center of a public road known as Harpole Road;
Thence along West right-of-way line of the Texas-Pacific Railroad and on a
curve to the left having a radius of 3,502,7 feet and a central angle of 21°
24' a distance of 1,308,26 feet to a point of tangency;
Thence South 00° 101 2311 West along West right-of-way line of the Texas-
Pacific Railroad a distance of 1,861,84 feet to a point;
-5-
Thence along the West right-of-way line of Texas-Pacific Railroad and on a
curve to the right having a radius of 6,575.7 feet and a central angle of 07'
24' a distance of 14.2 feet more or less to the North right-of-way line of F X
Highway No, 1172;
Thence South 89° 58' West along the North right-of-Way line of F.M.
Highway No, 1172 a distance of 77.1 feet to a point;
Thence South 81' 04' West along the North right-of-way line of F.M.
Highway No, 1172 a distance of 220 feet to a point;
Thence South 65' 23' West along the North right-of-way line of F X
Highway Nc. 1172 a distance of 195 feet to a point;
Thence South 63' 35' West along the North right-of-way line of F•M.
Highway No, 1172 a distance of 210 feet;
(hence South 64' 20' West along the North right-of-way line of F X
Highway No, 1172 a distance of 225 feet;
Thence South 71' 05' West along the North right-of-way line of F•M,
Highway No, 1172 a distance of 200 feet to a point, said point also being on
the East boundary line of P• Rock Survey, A-1063, Denton County, Texas;
Thence South 00' •36' East along the centerline of a public road known as
Cottonwood Road, said centerline also being the East boundary line of the F.w.
Thornton Survey, A-1244, Denton County, Texas, a distance of 2,078 feet to the
point of beginning and containing 605,85 acres, more or- less.
-6-
(b) The legislature finds and determines that the
boundaries of the District form a closure.
(c) If any mistake is made in the description of the
boundaries heretofore described, the mistake in no way
affects the organization, existence, and validity of the
District, the right of the District to issue bonds or
refunding bonds for the purpose for which the District is
created or to pay the principal of and interest on those
bonds, or the legality or operation of the District or its
governing body.
SECTION 3. FINDING OF BENEFIT. The legislature
finds and determines that all of the land and other property
included within boundaries of the District will be benefited
by the works and projects that are to be accomplished by the
District under the authority conferred by Article XVI,
Section 59, of the Texas Constitution, and that the District
is created to serve a public use and benefit.
SECTION 4. CONFIRMATION ELECTION, Before bonds or
otl,,,r obligations of the District are issued, the creation
c: Ana District must be approved at a confirmation election
to be held as provided by Chapter 54, Water Code.
SECTION 5. AUTHORITY UNDER GENERAL LAW. (a) The
District is hereby vested and empowered with all the rights,
powers, privileges, authority, and functions conferred and
imposed by general law, now in force or hereafter enacted,
applicable to municipal utility districts created under
Article XVI, Section 59, of the Texas Constitution, including
those conferred by Chapter 54, Water Code, as amended.
(b) If a provision of general law is in conflict or
inconsistent with this Act, the provisions of this Act shall
prevail.
(c) The rights, powers, privileges, authority, and
functions granted to the District under this Act are subject
to the continuing right of supervision of the State to be
exercised by and through the Texas Department of. Water
Resources.
SECTION 6. CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION OF SEWER SYSTEM.
'rhe District is hereby authorized and empowered to acquire and
construct, inside and outside the boundaries of the District, all
plants, works, equipment, improvements and facilities for the
collection, treatment and disposal of water-carried wastes (a
sewer System) and for the operation, administration and maintenance
thereof,
-7-
SECTION 7. CONTRACTS. (a) The District may enter
into sewage treatment or other contracts with a municipal
corporation or other political subdivision of the State of
Texas in the accomplishment of the District's authorized powers
and functions.
(b) If a contract provides that the District will make
payment from taxes, other than maintenance taxes, the
contract must be approved by a majority of the voters of the
District voting on the question at an election held for that
purpose, such election to be held and conducted in the same
manner described for the issuance of bonds payable from
taxes by a municipal utility district. If the contract is
approved, it constitutes an obligation against the taxing
power of the District to the extent provided in the contract.
SECTION 8, BOARD OF DIRECTORS. The District shall
be governed by a board of five directors and immediately
after this Act becomes effective, the following persons are
hereby appointed to serve as the initial directors of the
District and shall constitute the initial Board of Directorsi
Randall R. Davis, Ben Brown, Grover Wallace, Mary Margaret Moore,
and Charlotte Guest.
Such persons shall qualify to serve as the initial
directors of the District by executing the constitutional
oath of office. Should any of the above named persons fail
to'qualify for any reason, the remaining members of the
initial Board of Directors shall appoint their successor or
successors to fill such vacancy or vacanciesi provided,
however, if, at any time prior to the District being confirmed
at a confirmation election held in accordance with the
provisions of Section 4 hereof, three or more vacancies
exist on the initial Board of Directors, the Commissioners'
Court of Denton County, Texas shall appoint the necessary
number of directors to fill such vacancies on the Board.
The terms of office of two of the initial directors named
above, or their appointed successors, shall end on the 1st
Saturday in April, 1984 and the terms of office of three of
the initial directors named above, or their appointed
successors, shall end on the 1st Saturday, in April, 1985.
At the first meeting of the initial Board of Directors, the
persons named above, or their appointed successors, shall
determine and designate their respective terms of office as
specified above.
Succeeding directors shall be elected or appointed and
shall serve for two year terms of office in accordance with
the provisions of V.T.C.A., Water Code, Chapter 54, as
amended.
~g_
SECTION 9. LEGISLATIVE FINDING OF AUTHORITY, The
legislature finds and declares that the requirements of
Article XVI, Sections 59(d) and (e), of the Texas Constitu.
tion, have been performed and accomplished and that the
legislature has the authority to enact this Act.
SECTION 10. EMERGENCY, The importance of this
legislation and the crowded condition of the calendars in
both houses create an emergency and an imperative public
.necessity that the constitutional rule requiring bills to be
read on three several days in each house be suspended, and
this, rule is hereby suspended, and that this Act take effect
and be in force from and after its passage, and it is so
enacted,
• R
k~
_g_
A RESOLUTION by the City Council of the City of
Denton, Texas, consenting to the introduction of
an Act creating a Municipal tltilit District to be
known as the "Argyle Municipal Utility District'
and resolving other matters incident and related
thereto.
WHEREAS, in conformity with the provisions of Article
XVI, Section 59 of the Texas Constitution, the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas has been furnished a copy of a
proposed Act to be introduoed for passage by the Legislature
of the State of Texas during Its regular session in 1983
providing for the creation of a conservation and reclamation
district in Denton County, Texas) such district to be known
as the "Argyla Municipal Utility District" and to include
within its boundaries approximately 605.85 acres of
land, more or less, situated in Denton County, Texas and a
portion of which land is located within the extraterritorial
jurisdiction of the City of Denton, Texas) and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the Act creating said
District and other evidence and information relating to the
proposed District and has found and determined that consent
for the introduction of the Act at the regular session of
the Legislature of the State of Texas should be granted)
now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXASi
SECTION li That, in conformity with the provisions of
Article XVI, Section 59 of the Constitution of the State of
Texas, approval and consent is hereby given and granted for
the introduction at the regular session of the Legislature
of the State of Texas in 1983 of an Act providing for the
creation of a conservation and reclamation district to be
known as the "Argyle Municipal Utility District" and containing
land therein within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the
City of Denton, Texas.
SECT1014 21 That the City Secretary is hereby authorized
and directed fo forward a certified copy of this resolution
to the Governor, Lieutenant Governor and the Speaker of the
House as soon as possiblef evidencing the Council's consent
to the creation of the proposed District.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the _V day of 1?83.
Mayor, City of Denton, Texas
ATTEST)
City Secretary, City of
Denton, Texas
(City Seal)
I
I
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee Recommendation
on Electric Rate Study.
SUMMARY:
The Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee, at their meeting
on April 11, 1983, recommended to the Public Utilities Board a
set of proposed electric rates. Mr, Arthur D, Naas, Chairman
of the Committee, was present at the Public Utilities Board
meeting on April 20th to present the Committee's
recommendations,
The Committee recommended that an outside consultant be
employed to review the proposed rates for any significant
inequities between rate classes and to test the rates on the
City's consumption histories to assure that the rates will
proauce the revenue requireo, The Staff recommends that the
consulting enginee-ing firm of Gilbert Associates, who has had
extensive experience with the City of Denton's electric system
and financial records, be employed to conduct such a final
review of the proposed rates, A copy of the proposed contract
is attached herewith. Representatives of Gilbert Associates,
Austin, Texas, Rate Consulting Office will be in attendance at
the May 10th meeting to discuss details regarding the rates.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Estimated Cost $20,000
Source of Funds - Electric Administration Budget
"Services Account"
ACTION REQUIREO:
Approval by the City CouncII of the proposed contract with
Gilbert/Commonwealth in the amount of $20,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report from the Electric Rate Review Advisory
Committee and consider action on their recommendations,
The Electric Rate Review Committee recommends employment of an
outside consultant, and the Public Utilities Board, at their
meeting of April 20, 1983, concurred and recommended employment
of Gilbert Associates,
1994U-7
I _
Respectfully,
le,
R. E, Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT 1 Letter to Mr, Roland Laney, Chairman, PUB from Mr,
Arthur Haas, Chairman, EIacRate Review Advisory
Committee,
11 Summary & recommendation report from Electric Rate
Review Advisory Committee
1994U/8
423 Northridge
Denton, Tx 76201
April 14, 1983
Electric Rate Review Committee Report
Mr, Roland Laney, Chairman
Public Utilities Board
City of Denton Utilities
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Chairman Laney:
During the course of our review, the Electric Rate Review Committee
met seven times over the period from December 2, 1982, to April 11,
1963. 1 would like to take this opportunity to review with the
Board those seven meetings in retrospect, so as to enlighten the
Board on the bases of our recommendations.
MeetIng #1- December 2, 1983
Our first meeting was used primarily as a get acquainted session
whereby Committee and staff members could get to know one another.
The staff distributed an informational packet containing current
rate ordinances and other general rate information. The Staff gave
an indepth review of the City's electrical, system, both from an
operational and financial standpoint. The meeting closed with a
brief review of rate policy issues.
Meeting 02- January 10, 1983
The process of educating Committee members to the various aspects
and philosophys of electric rate setting continued in the second
meeting. The staff again distributed an informational packet
containing materials geared toward providing the Committee with a
better understanding of the cost of service approach towards rate
netting, The packet also contained a glossary of utility rate
making terms which proved very useful. A question and answer period
on such items as the charge of the Committee and time frames for the
completion of the project followed. The meeting ended with the
election of the Committee Chairman and Co-Chairman. (Art Haas,
Chairman, and Gilbert Burnstein, Co-Chairman.
Meeting j 3° January 31, 1983
The third meeting opened with a briefing by the Staff on the North
Texas State University situation and asked the Committee to keep the
situation in mind as we proceed through our examination. The
Committee then reviewed the Electric Department Budget. The Staff
briefed the Committee on some basic assumptions and methodologies
that would be used throughout the study. Committee members felt
that a thorough review of these assumptions was in order and
adjourned with the recommendation that the Committee members use the
time to review these assumptions and be prepared to discuss them at
the next meeting.
Meeting #4, February 21, 1983
The fourth meeting of the Committee brought about an upswing in
Committee work levels. The allocation of system expenses was
reviewed, and a very indepth discussion took place on the pro and
con aspects of implementing various Kate forms such as seasonal,
declining block and inverted rates. Study assumptions were again
reviewed in greater detail. First run rate proposals were presented
to the Committee and, at this point in our review, the intricacies
of electric rate design became apparent.
Meeting k51 March 71 1983
Proposed rates were once again reviewed at the fifth meeting. The
Committee reviewed each rate class's proposed rates and offered
their comments on how the rates may be modified or refined to
provide a more equitable distribution of system costs. In trying to
stay with the cost of service approach, it became evident that
certain rate classes, such as the residential and governmental
classes, would experience large increases in rates under such an
approach. The Committee felt that perhaps a long term
implementation of c,^)st-based rates over a period of three (3) to
five (5) years could accomplish the goals of cost of service rates
without severely impacting any of the rate classes. The issue of
placing demand charges on the governmental rate class was discussed
in depth. Legal as well as economic issues were raised that the
Committee felt would need to be resolved before any final
implementation of rates could take place. Fuel cost adjustments
were discussed, and it was the concensust of the Committee that the
method of passing changing fuel, costs to the customers by way of a
fuel or energy cost adjustment should be continued.
Meeting 6, March 21, 193;
The sixth meeting continued with proposed rate reviews. The
Committee re-affirmed their desire to remain on cost based rates
with periodic annual adjustments to the rates to accomplish the cost
based goal. Once again, discussions on the governmental rates took
place on the aspect of giving a break in the rate in consideration
for lost tax revenue to schools and county entities that would
otherwise be collected from a private or investor owned electric
system.
Meoting V, ApL i.l 11, 1983
At our seventh meeting, the Staff presented the Committee with a
synopsis of Committee and Staff agreements on assumptions and issues
identified throughout the prior meetings. The Staff identified
areas of concern such as final TMPA rates, electric system debt
service, rate implementation dates, and computer and staff
capabilities to perform any further rate analysis.
The charge given to the Committee was to provide input to the Public
Utilities Board as to the use,,.'s point of view on how to structure
and design the electric rates. The Electric Rate Review Committee
believes this task has been accomplished.
The following recommendations were made for the Public Utilities
Board to consident
Recommendations
1. The Electric Rate Review Committee recommended that the latest
proposed rates be forwarded to the Public Utilities Board for
consideration, except that the rates for the Denton Independent
School District remain open for further consideration and legal
opinions.
2. As general guidance and philosophy, the Committee recommended
that)
a) The cost of service approach to rate studying should be the
goal with a gradual implementation to prevent sudden large
changes,
b) The monthly energy cost adjustment be continued,
c) The summer/winter differential residential rates remain in
effect (but with 6 month periods) and non-seasonal rates !~e
in effect for all other classes,
d) The small residential user class be given a break in rates,
e) All electric residential rates be reduced during winter
months, and
f) Credit be given for transmission and distribution losses
for customers metered on the primary side.
3. The Electric Rate Review committee recommended that an outside
consultant be employed to,
l
a) Review the rates to assure that there are no major
inequities in the rates between customer classes,
b) test the revenues that these rates will produce based on
the City's consumption histories to assure appropriate
revenues, and
c) maintain the Committee's directives relating to rate
structures and other previously identified concerns.
A. The Electric Rate Review Committee recommended that the legal
questions pertaining to the implementation of. the demand rate
or governmental rates be resolved, and that subject consultant
be directed to examine the rates according to the legal
resolution.
5. The Electric Rate Review Committee recommended that it be
retained as an ad-hoc committee until the completion of the
electric rate review effort and be available to review the
findings and final recommendations on the electric rates.
In closing, I would like to make note of a final motion presented by
Gilbert Bernstein and seconced by Charles Hanley to have placed in
the Minutes the Committee's sincere thanks and appreciation for the
Staff's monumental effort and a fine job well done. This motion
passed unanimously with emphasis added.
I would like to also express appreciation on behalf of myself and
the rest of the Committee members for the opportunity to serve on
the Committee,. Although most of us were very naive concerning
electric rate structures, we gained an appreciation of the scope and
depth of the problem, and hope our contribution has been of value.
i
Sincerely,
a \9,54xon_t,
Arthur D. Haas, Chairman
blectric Rate Review Committee
City of Denton
ADH:gcr
cc: file j
CONTRACT
FOR ✓,~J/ ~`J
REVIEW OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC RATES
Contract made this , Day of , 19831 by and between the City of
Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation organized and existing under,
the Home Rule Amendment to the Constitution of Texas, (hereinafter
referred to as Denton) and Gilbert/Commonwealth, Engineers and
Consultants, Co„ a corporation duly authorized to transact business
within the State of Texas (hereinafter referred to as Consultant).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Denton wishes to employ Consultant for the purpose of
reviewing Electric Rates proposed by the Electric Rate Review
Advisory Committee. Such study consisting of:
1. A review of the proposed electric rates to assure that
there are no major inequities in allocation of cost
between rate classes= and,
2. Testing the rates based on the City of Denton's
consumption histories to assure that the rates will
produce the appropriate revenues.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
SECTION I
Consultant shall perform the services as set forth in Attachment 1
hereto.
SECTION II
In consideration of the services performed by Consultant under this
Contract, Denton shall pay Consultant:
A, Professional Services
Charges for professional services of Consultant's staff who
may be assigned to the project will be billed in accordance
with Consultant's standard hourly rates for the various
categories of personnel as follows:
Project Manager $ /hr
Technical Advisor $ /hr
Project Consultant $ /hr
Time charges will be made for personnel only while they ?ire
actually at work on the assignment and for travel time during
normal working hours.
ks, Out of Pocket Expenses
In addition to the cost of professional services, certain
other expenses consisting of, but not limited to, travel,
lodging, and living expenses of Gilbert/Commonwealth
k,ngineers & Consultants, Co., employees when engaged on a
project away from the home orrice, plus long distance
telephone and other incidental charges will be billed at
cost. Printing, reproduction and data processing charges, as
required, will be billed in accordance with Consultants'
standard rates prevailing at the time such services are
rendered. The use or Consultants' automobiles shall be
charged at 25¢ per mile. Rented automobiles will be billed
at cost.
SECTION III
Invoices shall be rendered monthly for the preceding month's
services performed and expenses incurred on Denton's behalf, and
such invoices shall be due and payable fifteen days after receipt of
the invoice.
1979U/2
9;cTION z
The Director of Utilities will serve as Project Manager for the
Study. The City will make available to the Consultant all
information that may be relevant to the City that is available
within the records of the City.
SECTION V
Denton may terminate this Contract upon thirty days prior written
notice to Consultant. In the event of termination, Uenton shall pay
Consultant for full services rendered and expenses incurred to date
of termination and Uenton shall receive all completed analysis
comparisons, and work done to the date of termination and any work
in progress or incomplete reports will be delivered to uenton.
SECTION VI
Consultant will complete its' services under this Contract and
deliver the required reports by , 1983.
SECTIUN VII
In no event shall Consultant be liable in any cause of actian for
special, indirect or consequential damages of any nature.
SECTION VIII
The provisions of this Contract constitute the entire agreement
between the parties and supersede all prior communications,
representations, and agreements, oral or written, between the
parties hereto with respect to the subject of this Contract.
i
1979U/3 I~
I,
i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their hands and seals
the day and year first above written*
GILBERT/COMMONWEALTH CONSULTANTS, INC.
ATT"T t
BY BY
Title Title
ATTF.STt CITY OF DENTON, TEXA5
8y _ BY
Title Title
1979U/4
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Review of Denton's Cost -of -Service Study by analysis of
historicai data utilizea as input, This review will
consist of determining the actual billing information
produced by Data Processing by class, by month, including:
Customers
KWH
Billing aemand wnere appropriate
Revenues
Bill frequency data
Also to be reviewed will be accounting information as
follows:
Plant capital costs by major functional areas including
production, transmission, distribution, general, custome:
and street lighting. Where available, these costs will e
reviewed on an account basis within each major functional
category above for allocation purposes.
Similarly, Denton's operating expenses, including
production, transmission, distribution, customer service,
administrative and general, purchase power and others as
identified, such as debt service, transfers, and nea
construction, snall be reviewed for allocation purposes.
After our review of the cost-of-service data base ano
analysis performed by Menton, Gilbert, will identify areas
where deficiencies exist, if any, and recommend appropriate
action to correct, including any metnoaology changes in the
cost-or'-service analysis.
The cost-of-service review will incorporate the Electric
Rate Review Advisory Committee's general guidelines anu
philosophy in rate design, which may be based on the
existing cost-of-service or a modified cost-of-service
recommended by Gilbert. This Includes special attention to
the Committee's concerns of the governmental rate for t.-,e
Denton Independent School District,
2. Gilbert will conduct a test, of the revenues that the races
will produce using the City's consumption histories
assure appropriate revenues based on the following steps;
a) Existing actual revenues by customer class.
b) Establish actual cost by customer class through t;.e
allocations developed in the cost-of-service review.
c) Review results of allocated costs vs revenue levels :n
order to establish targets for rate design, keeping in
mind the guidelines of the Electric Rate Re v;._a
Advisory Committee.
MINUTES
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
April 20, 1983
Members Present: Chairman, Roland Laney, Marvin Loveless, Charles
Cryan, Ed Coomes, Leonard Herring
Chris Hartungr Bob Nelson
Staff Present: Ernie Tullos, Dave Ham, Bob Fiorini
Others Present: Al Herman and Paul Norman, Gilbert Commonwealth
Reverend Rasberry, National Southern Baptist
Convention
Art Haas, Chairman, Electric Rate Review Advisory
Committee
Nita Thurman, Denton Record-Chronicle
1. CONSIDER MINUTES OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING OF MARCH- 23t
19831
Coomes made a motion to accept the Minutes as stated. Se~::ond
by Cryan, five ayes, no naves, motion carried.
2. CONSIDER ELECTRIC RATE REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE: RECOMMENDATION
ON ELECTRIC RATE STUDYi
Nelson briefed the Board on the background of the rate review
effort and then introduced Art Haas, Chairman of the Electric
Rate Review Advisory Committee, to review the Committee's
recommendations. Mr. Haas first recognized the Committee
members which included Gilbert Bernstein representing the.
Denton Independent School District; Dick Craven representing
the small commercial consumer; Charles Hanley representing
Texas Women's University; Juanita Milam representing the small
residential consumer; Wayne Olson representing local industry;
Delbert Overstreet representing North Texas State University;
Dick Stewart, Mayor, representing the City Council; Rose Taylor
representing the homemaker; Cassandra Gotham representS.ny the
League of Women Voters; Leonard Herring representing the °,.:b,lic
Utilities Board; and Mike Lewis representing home buil.:ers.
Mr. Haas then recognized the Utility Department Staff fo: the
fine effort in preparing materials for the Electric Rate Review
Advisory Committee meetings. Mr. Haas then reviewed the
Committee recommendations with the Public Utilities 3oard
members.
1 +~r.•... a•. ~~rM wu...r `-M I... • • . r...-.M . 4.4•r-.~• .
The Committee's recommendations were;
1. That the latest proposed rates ba forwarded to the Public
Utilities Board for consideration, except that the rates
for the Denton Independent School District remain open for
further consideration and legal opinions.
2. As general guidance and philosophy, the Committee
recommended that:
a. The cost of service approach to rate studying should be
the goal with a gradual implementation to prevent
sudden large changes)
b. The monthly energy cost adjustment be continued,
c. The summer/winter differential residential rates remain
in effect (but with 6 month periods) and non-seasonal
rates be in effect for all other classes,
d. The small residential user class be given a break in
rates)
e, All electric residential rates be reduced during winter
months, and,
f. Credit be given for transmission and distribution
losses for customers metered on the primary side.
3. The Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee recommended
that an outside consultant be employed to:
a, Review the rates to assure that there are no major
inequities in the rates between customer classes)
b. Test the revenues that these rates will produce based
on the city's consumption histories to assure
appropriate revenues) and,
c. Maintain the Committee's directives relating to rate
structures and other previously identified concerns,
4. The Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee recommended
that the legal questions pertaining to the implementation
of the demand rate for governmental rates be resolved, and
that subject consultant be directed to examine the rates
according to the legal resolution.
After discussion, Cryan maoe a motion that a Resolution of
Appreciation be drafted for recognizing the Committee's fine
effort in the Electric Rate Review. Second by Coomes, five
ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
Coomes made a motion to recommend to the City Council that the
Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee be retained as an
ad-hoc committee and be available to review the findings and
final recommendations on the electric rates. Second by
Herring, five ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
Y.♦ F• ~.r n.u ~4 WMM•4+W 4r \n N..•. ~1•+u• r\n .\.~n.\.• \n • F4wM.. ..•4~4~rrr.1 rv•
PUB Minutes 4-20-83
..3_
Nelson then briefed the Board on the proposed rates that were
developed as a result of the Electric Rate Review Advisory
Committee's efforts. Nelson identified the methodology used in
determining the rates and then compared the proposed rates to
the present rates.
After discussion, Cryan made a motion to receive the report
from the Committee. Second by Loveless, five ayes, no nayes,
motion carried.
3. CONSIDER CONTRACT WITH GILBERT/COMMONWEALTHt ENGINEERS AND
CC NSULTANTS, COMPANY TO REVIEW PROPOSED ELECTRIC RATES-
Nelson introduced Al Herman of Gilbert/Commonwealth to review
the scope of the contract. Herman identified the major areas
of the review of the proposed rates as followsi
1. Review of Denton's cost of service study by analysis of
historical data utilized as input,
2. Test the rates for revenue stability on the test year.
3. Identify problem areas on the cost of service and recommend
corrections.
Herman stated that they are prepared to follow the Committee's
guidelines and vary the scope of the effort according to the
directives of the Public Utilities Board. Herman stated that
their contract was for a not to exceed price of $20,000 and
added that work outside of the scope of the project would be
renegotiated with the board and that no work would proceed
until authorized to do so by the Public Utilities Board and
City Council. Herman added that the $20tOOO, figure is based on
Gilbert being able to use the City's computer. If the city's
computer could not be made available, a renegotiation of the
contract price might be necessary.
Member Herring asked for Gilbert/Commonwealth's qualifications
to perform the study. Herman introduced Paul Norman who
identified the firm's qualifications by reviewing past studies
they have done throughout the State of Texas. Nelson added
that Gilbert/Commonwealth has been used on four prior occasions
for the City in the areas of power supply and management
studies. Nelson added that the City was thoroughly satisfied
with these efforts.
After discussion, Herring made a motion to recommend to the
City Council that Gilbert/Commonwealth be employed to review
the proposed electric rates at a contract price of not to
;exceed $20,000. Second by Coomes, five ayes, no nayes, motion
carried.
1y
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGLNUA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider Change Order #3 of Contract C-48-1188-13 Hickory Creek
Lift Sta.-ion for Red River Construction Company. PUrc:hase Order ~S ~03~1
SUMMARY$
This cnange order consists of construction improvements to the
wet well air bubbler pipe system which were not Foreseen at
time of design. This air supply is needed to prevent sewage
from becoming septic by increasing air flow to raw sewage wn~11
may be retained for an extensive period of time in wet well.
1. The Contractor shall furnish a continuous duty rated air
compressor capable of deliverinq at least 1.0 CFM at 40 psi
of oil free air. Tne motor shall be 115V, 60 Hz, single
phase, NEMA Class 13 design, with ball bearings and
integral thermal protection. The compressor shall have
heavy duty pistons, teflon rings, and life-time grease
packed bearings. The compressor shall be mounted on a 3
gallon receiver tank which meets ASME NAtional Board U-1
code. The air compressor and receiver shall be one
integral unit, complete with all necessary appurtances to
include, but not be limited to, a pressure gauge, pressure
switch, pressure regulator, belt guard, and shut-off cock
on the outlet. The air compressor unit shall be Granger
Speed Air Model No. 26653 (or 32653) or Bell and Gossett
comparable units or equal.
2. Connect the air compressor to Circuit LA-16 with 2 #12, #12
ground in 3/4 inch conduit.
3. Connect the air output from the compressor to the air set
in the level control catbinet with 3/8 inch copper tubing.
FISCAL. SUMMARY;
The Utility Staff requests a change order for the following
items.
1. Installation of an air compressor.
2. Connect air compressor and electrical circuitry.
3. Connect air compressor air bubbler piping system.
Net Increase for above: $550.00
1994U/14
Source of Fundsc Bond Funds and possibly Environmental
Protection Agency.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or disapproval of change order #3 by City Council.
RECOKMENDATION1
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of April 20, 1963,
recommended to the City Council that subject change order #3 in
the amount of $550.00 be approved.
Respectfully,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
hXHIBIT I Description of Change Order 43 with sketch.
.1994U/15
1
' SIMON W. PR999L P-L
JAMAA R. NICHOLS, P.L
6LK IL PRKKAI.pL PL
ROOKAT & OOOCH. P.L
,y N E A N D u `1 y I C A O L S a I Y n 1 jot PAUL JONJW. PAL
90N Ilk P,L
~f tt 11 U ROBIRT A. 7HOMPSO
JOK 0. MAPES. P.L
C O N $ U L T I N G E N 0 1 N E E R S OCiK C. ALLAN. P.L
W. KRNKBT CLLNANT. P.L
ALVIN C. COP"NO. RL
JOHN H, COON. P.L
T. ANTHONY AWO. P.L
GARY N. RKAV119. PX
April 15, 1983
Red River Construction Co.
P. 0. Box 923
Addinon, Texas 75001
Re: Denton, Texas
Hickory Greek Lift Station
Change Order No. 3
Gentlemen:
Attached please find eight (8) copies of Change Order No. 3 to the
referenced project adding a small air compressor for operation of the
bubbler control system ofor the pumps, Please oxecute all eight (8)
copies of the Change Order and forward them to Mr, C. David Ham,
Assistant Director of Utilities, City of Denton for their signature.
An executed copy will be returned to you for your files after approval
by the City of Denton.
Yours very truly,
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
Elvin C. Copeland, P.E.
ECC:ce
Attachment
xr: Coy Veach
David Ham
a
TELEPHONE 8 17 13 a.7161 8 11 LAMAR STREET FORT WORTH. ICKAO 76102
I
CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORDER
PROJECT, Hickory Creek Lift Station
CONTRACTi C-48-1188-13
OWNERt City of Denton, Texas
CONTRACTORi Red River Construction Company
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 DATE, April 15, 1983
CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK TO 8E PERFORMED
furnish and install a 1.0 CFM air compressor and receiver, with controls,
',1 accordance with attached drawing and specifications to furnish control
liii% for the lift station wet well bubbler system.
Add $550.00
Previous contract amount $933,127.43
Net (incrense)(d<. in evontract amount 550.00
Revised contract amount 933,677.43
Not (inerease)(decrease)in contract time of completion No change
Revised contract time of completion No change
Recommends' by Approved by OWNER
FREESE AND NICHOLS
By
By
Dltlri6utlonf
Approved by CONTRACTOR I-ownr
I - Contra clot
I - F. A N. 41nea
By I - Rat. Eng.
Muni
1 tl
1 DENTON, TEXAS
HICKOPIY CREEK LIFT STATION
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
1. The Contractor shall furnish a continuous duty rated air compressc"
capable of deliveringg at least 1.0 CFM at 40 psi of oil free air.
The motor shall be 115V, 60 Hz, single phase, NEMA Class 13 design,
with ball bearings and integral thermal protection. The compressor
shall have heavy duty pistons, teflon rings, and life-time grease
packed bearings, The compressor shall be mounted on a 3 gallon
receiver tank, The air
compressor and receiver shall be one integral unit, complete with
all' necessary appurtances to include, but not be limited to, a
pressure gauge, pressure switch, pressure regulator, belt guard,
and shut-off cock on the outlet. The air compressor unit shall be
Granger Speed Air Model No, 22653 (or 32653) or Bell and Gossett
comparable unit, or equal.
2. Connect the air compressor to Circuit LA-16 with 2 #120 #12 ground
in 3/4 inch conduit.
3. Connect the air output from the compressor to the air set in the
level control cabinet with 3/8 inch copper tubing.
s
FREESE & NICHOLS
CONSUMNO @NOIN!!RS
~ v
j
~ v
u ~
u
Q
4
0
a
DENTO1, TEXAS
HICKORY CREEK LIFT STATION
CHANCE ORDER NO. 3
PUB Nil nutes 4-20-83
-6-
9. CONSIDER PARTICIPATION IN OVERSIZE (Above 10" Diameter OF
SA I ARY W RUNE 'R b' AT' HIGHWAY EAST 38U TO COOPER REEK
LIFT STATION SERVING ,6ANDY HILLS MOBILE t1 LME SUBDIVISION AND
CAPRICORN MOBILE HOME PARK s
Ham briefed the Board by stating that the developers of the
Sandy Hills Subdivision and Capricorn Mobile Home Park are
attempting to construct a sanitary sewerline from Highway 380
East adjacent to the Capricorn Mobile Home Park to the City of
Denton's Cooper Creek Lift Station. Ham added that the
original proposal was to build two lift stations and run. a
force main which the City would not want. to do because of
maintenance problems and operating costs involved with the lift
stations.' Ham stated that the 1.8" gravity line was a more
feasible way to go and that the City should look at
participation in the cost of oversizing that line from a 10" to
18" and concluded by stating that the City's participation cost
would be approximately $70,000.
Cryan made a motion to recommend to the City Council that
subject participation agreement be approved. Second by
Loveless, four ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
10. CONSIDER PARTICIPATION IN LEGAL ACTION WITH DEVELOPERS OF SANDY
X106
HILLS N1UH'ILE HOME SUBDIVISION AND CAPRICORN i ILE HORE PARK TO
OBTAIN NECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY SLWER AND WATER LINES:
Ham briefed the Board by stating that the developers have asked
the City of Denton to assist them in acquiring easements since
the waterline they plan to construct will become property of
the City of Denton upon completion. He added that the
developers believe that without the City's help, easements will
be impossible to obtain. Nelson pointed out to the Board that .
this was a departure in policy and that tite City normally
requires all easements to be obtained by the developer.
Chairman Laney stated that he was uncomfortable' in changing
policy on such a matter and would like to review the situation
in more depth. Herring then made a motion to table this item
to the next meeting of the Public Utilities Board. Second by
Cryan, four ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
11. CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER 431 CONTRACT C-48-1188-13, HICKORY CREEK
LIFT STATION FOR RED RIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANYi
Ham briefed the Board by stating that subject Change Order,
consists of construction improvements to the wet well air
bubbler pipe system which were not foreseen at the time of
uesign. He added that this air supply is needed to prevent
sewage from becoming septic by increasing air flow to raw
sewage which may be retained for an extensive period of time in
the wet well. After a brief disasssion, Cryan made a motion to
recommend to the City Council that subject Change Order be
approved. Second by Herring, four ayes, no nayes, motion
carried.
15
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA I'TLM
SU6JLCTi
Consider Change Order 413, C-48-1188-03, Wastewater Treatment
Plant, from Gracon Construction Company and Freese ana Nichols,
incorporated, 1111) 08971
60MMARYi
This Change Order consists of a plant improvement which
developed on March 31, 1983. On this date, a meeting was held
in Dallas with the Environmental Protection Agency, at their
request. Persons in attendance were David Ham, Assistant
Director of Utilities, Water/Wastewater] Bob King,
Superintendent, Wastewater Treatment Plants and, Howard Martin,
Environmental Services Administrator. Mr. Jerry Saunders, EPA
Engineer, indicated that It would be an absolute requirement
for the City of Denton to measure the wastewater effluent
leaving the Wastewater Treatment Plant. At this time, the
effluent cannot be totally measured without the construction of
a manhole, and a flume meter inserted on a 12" side stream
line. By the insertion of this manhole, meter and some pipe
reconfiguration, EPA compliance would be met. The deadline
established for this Environmental Protection Agency compliance
is September 11 1983.
It was indicated at a subsequent meeting held with Mr. Gary
Kosut of the Texas Department of Water Resources, that this
meter would be 75% grant eligible provided it was constructed
as a Change Order to the Wastewater Treatment Plant presently
in its final stage of completion.
FISCAL SUMMARY;
Freese and Nichols, Engineers, have determined that the cost of
this manhole, flume meter and pipe reconfiguration will cost
approximately $8,440.
Source of Funds - Water/Sewer Bond Funds and possibly 75%
Environmental Protection Agency assistance.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approval or disapproval by City Council.
19940-1
RECOMMLNDATIONi
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting Of April 20, 1983,
recommended to the City Council approval of Change Order #13 in
the amount of $8,440.
Respectfully, J
R. 1~, Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBITS Change Order 013 & Associated Backup
1 l
CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORD'IR
PROJECT, Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
CONTRACTr C-48-1188-03
OWNERI City of Denton, Texas
CONTRACTOR: Gracon Construction Company
CHANGE ORDER NO. 13 DATEI April 19, 1983
CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK TO 89 PERFORMED
1. Construct 60" diameter manhole on 12" concrete drain line and
install a Palmer Bowlus type flow meter, Make necessary revision to
existing drain sines to di vertal I flows to the meter. See attached.
(Meter is required to measure plant side streams per EPA directives).
Previous contract amount $7,866,850.00
Not(inerease9d94V►0V.In contract amount 81440.00
Revised contract amount 7,875,290.00
Not(Increase)(decreose)in contract time of completion No Change
Revised contract time of completlon No Change
Recommended by Approved by OWNER
FREESE AND NICHOLS
By
By r:
DIslrlbullom
Approved by CONTRACTOR I - ownu 1
I - Cenlradar
1 F. & N. otRe•
By _ I - Rr,a Eng.
1
Ohange Order for the Construotion of
Plow Meter on the 12" Oonorete Drain Tine,
It Conneot the 611 oast iron drain line to the 8" oast iron line
and plug the 6" sewer drain line in the area of the north plant
primary olarifiurs s shown in Figure It
24 Oonstruot a 60" diameter manhole at the looation shown in
Figure 2. Install a Palmer Bowlus exit pipe flume with a Manning
Model PBF-12-E level sensor and a Drexelbrook Model 303-331-604-
flow transmitter in a NEMA 4 enolosure,
3, Run 2 ,#12, 12 gnd in a 3/4" oonduit from the existing motor
oontrol oenter at the north ohlorine oontaot basin to the meter
and make the neoessary eleotrioal oonneotion to supply power to
the meter,
u
.j
01 V
FH I
XIS
yyQQyy ~gg~~ PRIMARY
LUP C PMP
STA
` ` EI~EfcSw ANI11 CUMNECT y IiPSTAI~ 'TT' AM
S I WN uALVE I CIQNI CC
i o.?l k'X19T I 'All 11/
i TALL EE -,o
vl : L>rlSf'i'bi _
bull
.lo 0 i +t
n 'lIa
L Out
1 LI ~
I
EXIST. NIMARY ~a I ( I I Fl
y C L A R t f 1 E R i I I Mug
4'i nnx
c'CO RCto'lnec f 24I' NC.
\ ,'"G'Y .1 111d .1 w. AS (P) till
fit
_ ._i•In'o rlcf+.... _ _ I f + - yMLVE9 I~1, Ai
f=Nc. PIPES I
.~bI~ °I 1Gt c~ fail I `XC SHT. PP-
dy1 e~ I I»
M
n f ~3 ,
E X I S T, PRIMARY Li E X I S T PRIMARY
SAMPI
HT H FI ~ ~ r C 1
I ` , 3/4" PVC PIPE 11
C,a, r.3 r~ t
kXIST' HYDRO LM
P14RUMATIO "
PRESSURE TAN ~
it
Log
I 14 %.'(JClI7L1yC`ig. J'1YLti.K -'1+\~M1'4~i~. [.4 A:=1:71}L'\'ti:-w4W .•~4Vi1' 1 yi.1.1.~.A. W'w J+iY:-4"~ri~:Mi~~il.K.i1 Ij~1.~w4h~W .-Z{. ,lt 1~ ~I
~i
W
AND P1.1.4.
F, uoa
Nl r V [7
C. D• #13 .I'•h-d M ~ 1 T1 ANHAt-E
o
I
r bjASIER o
g TOP OF k ST RIM
f M,H. SIA; 147623
;
' N
1
a Fv /
.
i II
til,/ I]
`
N co dto ~ Cc,' I \
y E, FF. PUMP STA~ I
XI o" C I It1 Q... IB'C1fl 6-DRAIMM)_
fr3' TaTZfl aidSi1:.7ICt-ai:Z:3FF'fE"!- ~I .s i4tz"i?i`7.' ~2~~i.~.i.auu'F.".u= -~1~.(~ r 4.~~'1tY\Tfi:3tr.-c~'s I
2" P. V B"gECIN EI / _
S' ° E*XIST. CHLORNE
I
d REIN-CONC. n ' _ I
CONTACT BASIN
30 C_ONCAt 1 _
- - i~~JUr J[ (WATER EL. 509,67) _ i
10 NEMAIN IN PLACE
, ME
30concif 0{: r 6/~l6S - "•n~ ( I A P
_ l\ - NO.6 ROP)
C A Sr 1 `I _ , , . rn CONC I F I
('~r'ANG'E aye o~,e 0 / 3
M~TE2~NG, rya+vNo~~ o~I
r2'+ G'o~vcRE rt: ~-pAIN LINE
F/o w 774,9e7at i ,d
oecCvel beobp A ads/
303-331-dd- ro, -Alrm,4
4 Eric/, Sca/ed c,I.7oa
Mf, W, ti, pea bae }
ro o ~o~
QBS i~ +
t~
~~"Cond~il'
Manv~cJ~rUs 1~12n ho lc
LL
y--
P~/,~ e fro w /vs
6x1'-P,pc r/vme
Mann ink Mo dd/ Grove Sao
!2 Conc, 10,03,f i2-Ec__~ eve/ S~nsa~
i ~ ~ r2"Conc.
E/ 54'4.6 a
Ole.
cm v
~v.r.•~r._r..\I.MMr.,~F..•~.\r..hr♦.rh..♦..♦.I.r.M.r••♦••r-\•I..rr..r.i....M •rN •rr.. M... r.~♦•.. w..•~7r
PUB hllnutes 4-20-
12. CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER 413 C-48-1188-03 WASTEWATER TREAV,L-_JJT
PLA T, WC-)M G ACON C NS` RVC TUN COMPANY AND FREESE AND NICHO:.:,,
ICI CORPORATED i
Ham briefed the Board by stating that this $8,440 Change Order
was for the construction of a manhole and a flume meter
inserted on the 12" side stream line of the effluent from ^.e
wastewater Treatment Plant. He added that the EPA indica;:.ea
that it would be an absolute requirement for the City of Den-on
to measure the wastewater effluent leaving the Wastewa.er
Treatment Plant and that this Change Order was necessary to
comply with the EPA directive. Hnm concluded by stating that
discussions were held with the Texas Department of Wa.er
Resources, and indications are very favorable that subj -:,rct
Change Order will receive 758 funding through the EPA gra;t.
After a brief discussion, Herring made a motion to recommend to
the City Council subject Change Order be approved. Second by
Cryan, four ayes, no nayes, motion carried,
13. CONSIDER CONTRACT WITH ED BLAYLOCK FOR UTILITY VIDEO SL.DE
PROGRAM:
Nelson briefed the Board by stating that at the Pubic
Utilities Board Planning Session, the Board expressed an
interest in the Utility Department developing a video slide
program describing the activities and functions of the Uti qty
Department, Nelson then reviewed the attached agreement with
rid Blaylock to provide the professional services for produc.ng
such a program.
.vt son mentioned that he would anticipate the slide program
being divided into three sections which would include=
1. A brief introduction of the history of Denton's uti-*,ty
system;
21 A tour of Denton's water/wastewater system; and,
3. A tour of Denton's electric system.
Nelson added that the Staff reviewed a video tape of one of
Mr. Blaylock's efforts in this area and was very pleased.
Herring then made a motion to recommend to the City Cou:-,--ii
that subject agreement for a video slide program be approved.
Second by Cryan, four ayes, no naves, motion carried.
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA I'T'EM
SUSJECTs
Consider Funding Ana Purchase Of The bystem Control Ana Data
Acquisition (SCADA) For 'The Raw Water Pump Station And wager
Plant. RLd 110092.
SUMMARY:
bids were opened in January, 1983, for the SCADA contract which
included electrical components for the Llectric, Water and
Wastewater Divisions. The low bidder was Advanced Control
Systems, Incorporated, Atlanta, Georgia, The SCADA system for
the Water and Wastewater Divisions will provide remote control.
from the Water Plant to the Raw Water Pump Station
(approximately 10 miles) and from the Wastewater Treatment•.
Plant to the various sewage lift stations around Denton. This
remote control system is capable of starting and stopping
motors/pumps, and opening and closing valves. For the Raw
Water Pump Station, this particular contract is to replace a
1955 remote control system which is often inoperative due to
age and unavailability of parts. The old systems functions are
also very limited compared to the new system.
Due to the nigh bid unit prices received, it has only been
possible to purchase the Llectric Division requirements since
Water and Sewer Funds were inadequate at time of bid award.
with the refinancing of tree Water and Sewer Bonds, it is now
possible and essential to purchase the Water Plant - Raw Water
Pumping Station portion of this contract. The Wastewater
't'reatment Plant to Lift Station SCADA will be planned for
funding in 1985.
FISCAL SUMMARYI
The Utility Staff requests the purchase of the following items;
1. One Advanced Control System MPH-3050
Microprocessor based Remote 't'erminal
Unit $ 8,512
2, One Color Graphics CRT Console For
Additionri To Existing HPM-3075 Master
Station $13,165
3. One Software License For ACS Dedicated
Dispatch utfice (DDO) Software
Subsystem $ 6,000
1994U/12
4. Spare Parts k'or MPR-3050 RTV Such ASS
One Microprocessor 0,10dule 1,000
One Modem 6 1000
One 24 VDC Power Supply $ 2,000
5, Labor eor Installation $ 21000
Total Cost $321077
,Source of Funds - Bond Funds.
ACTION RRQUIRED4
Approve or 01sapprove subject purchase.
R4COMMGNDAT I ON :
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of April 20, 1983,
recommended to the City Council approval for the purchase of
items listed above from Advanced Control Systems, Incorporated
of Atlanta, Georgia, in the amount of $32,077.
Respectfully,
R, P,. Nelson
Uirector of Utilities
I
i
1994U/13
PUB Minutes 4-20-83
.5-
6. CONSIDER FU NIING AND PURCHASE OF THE SYSTEM CONTROL AND DATA
AC U~ IST-TY-6N (SCADA) FOR THE RAW W TER PUMP STATION AND WATER
PLANT&
Ham briefed the Board by stating that this was a remote control
system and capable of starting and stopping motors and pumps,
opening and closing valves at the Raw Water Pump Station, He
added that the low oidder was Advanced Control Systems,
Incorporated out of Atlanta, Georgia and that the total package
would cost $32,077 and recommended that the Advanced Control
Systems bid be accepted. Herring made a motion to recommend to
the City Council that the SCADA system be purchased from
Advanced Control Systems, Incorporated of Atlanta, Georgia, in
the amount of $32,077. Second by Cryan, four ayes, no nayes,
motion calrried.
7. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD OF BID FOR PECAN CREEK DAM:
Ham briefed the Board by stating that there were five (5)
bidders on the project, bidding prices that rangea from a low
bid of $55,518 to a high bid of $95,370. Chairman Laney asked
if this was part of the Felix Callahan settlement. Nelson
replied that it was and added that the City has held up on
awarding this bid in order to examine various alternatives
which would include an in-house effort to build the dam.
Nelson added that the review of these alternatives were not
very favorable. Cryan than made a motion to recommend to the
City Council that Jay-Mar Corporation be awarded the bid in the
amount of $55,518. Second by Laney, three ayes, no nayes, one
abstention (Herring), motion passed.
8. CONSIDER PURCHASING EASEMENTS FROM TLXAS ~LMUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
TiMPA s I
Tullos briefed the board by stating that in order. to extend
electrical distribution to the north and south out of the new
Airport Substation, it would be necessary to acquire
right-of-way. He added that TMPA has the right-of -way for
their transmission line to the north and south from this
station and have agreed to offer 15' of the west side of their
easement for our use. Tullos concluded by stating that TMPP.
has offered these easements for a total of $10. Herring then
made a motion to recommend to the City Council that subject
easement purchase be approved. Second by Cryan, four ayes, no
nayes, motion carried.
f
I
i
i
' I
may 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SOBJECTs
Consider Contract Witn u(1 Blaylock Foz A Utility Video Slide
Program.
SUMMARY i
At the Public Utilities Board Planning Session, the Board
expressed an interest in the Utility Department developing a
video slide program describing the activities and functions of
the Utility Department. Attached is an agreement with Mr. Ed
Blaylock to provide professional services for producing such a
video slide program. The cost of this program will be $21500
for professional services ana $1,500 for film, supplies and
equipment.
The slide program will be divided into three sectionsi 1) a
brief introduction of the history of Denton's utility systemr
2) a "tour"+ of Denton's water system from the water pumping
station at Lake Lewisville through the treatment system to the
distribution system to the home and back through the wastewater
collection system through the wastewater treatment plant and
back to Lake Lewisville) and, 3) a tour of the electric system
from power production throuyh the transmission ana substation
systems through the distribution system to the customer's
home. The slide program will focus on facilities, equipment
and personnel on-the-job and how the City provides utility
services to the customer. Mr, Blaylock plans to take a number
of black and white photos around the utility and develop a
workbook presentation which the Staff will review for content.
He will then develop the narrative with review from Utility
Staff. The slide program will be a full color multiple slide
projector media program with accompanying voice narration.
Also attached is Mr. Blaylock's proposal and resume. It is
anticipated that the program would be used for orientation of
new Council or Board members or other officials of the City,
for presentation to new employees of the City, and to present
to various civic groups in the community.
FISCAL SUMMARY;
Program Cost $4,000
Source of Funds - Account $85-02, Special Services, Electric
Utility Administration and Water/Wastewater Utility
Administration.
1994U/10
ACTION REQUIRED1
Approval of disapproval of video slide program.
RECONMENDAT ION t
The Public Utilities Board, at tneir meeting of April 20, 1983,
recommended to the City Council that subject Agreement with Mr.
Led Blaylock to provide professional services and develop a
video slide program of the Denton Utility System be approved.
Respecfully?
R, 6, cielson
Director of Utilities
6XHIB1T I Proposed Agreement With Ed Blaylock
I1 Proposal. and Resume of Ed Blaylock
1994U/11
FOR i
PROFESSIONAL 6ERVIC46 FOR VIDLO SLIu~ ;PROtiFi11M ~
Contract made this Day of_, 1983, by ana between the City of
Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation organized and existing under
the Home. Rule Amendment to the Constitution of Texas, (hereinafter
referred to as Denton) and Thomas Eawin Blaylock, (hereinafter
called the Consultant)
WITNESSETH3
WHEREAS, Denton wishes to employ Consultant for the purpose of
producing a twenty (2(1 minute video slide program of the Utility
system. The video slide program will consist of:
1. An introduction with a brief history of Denton's
utility system; and,
2. A "Tour" of Denton's Water System from the Water
Pumping Station at Lake Lewisville through the
treatment system to the distribution system to the home
user ano back through the wastewater Collection System,
through the Wastewater Treatment Plant and back to Lake
Lewisville; and,
3. A "Tour" of Denton's Electric System from Power
Production through the transmission system to the
substation system through the distribution system to
the customer's home.
NOW, THr;REFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
1. Employment of the Consultant
The City agrees to engage the Consultant and the Consultant
hereby agrees to perform the following services:
2. Sao a of Services
The Consultant shall do, perform and carry our, in a good and
professional manner the following servioesi
a) Development of a twenty minute multi-projeotor,
narrated, colored slide program explaining the
functions of the City's utility system. The slide
program will focus on facilities, equipment and
on-the-job personnel describing how the City provides
utility services to the customer.
b) The Consultant shall take a number of black and white
photos of the various utility facilities, etc., and
develop a workbook presentation which the City will
review. The Consultant shall review the entire draft
of the program including video and narrative at each
stage of the production of the slide program.
Time of performance .
The services to be performed hereunder by the Consultant
shall be undertaken and completed in such sequence as to
assure the expeditious completion of the Scope of Services
and the purposes of this Agreement. All services requirea
hereunder shall be completed within two months from the date
this contract is signed by both parties.
4. Compensation
The City agrees to pay the Consultant a sum not to exceed
four thousand ($4,000.00) dollars for all services outlined
herein, which shall include reimbursement for expenses
incurred. Consultant agrees to complete the project and all
services provided herein for said sum.
50 Method of Payment,
Invoices shall be rendered monthly for the preceding month's
services performed. Such invoices shall be due and payable
fifteen days after receipt of the invoice.
6. Termination of Agreement
If, through any cause, the Consultant shall fail to fulfill
in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under
this Agreement, the City shall thereupon have the right to
terminate this agreement with cause, by giving written notice
of such termination specifying the effective date thereof, at
least fifteen days before the effective date of such
termination. In the event of termination, the Consultant
shall delivery to the City all work done to the date of
termination and any work in progress for which the City has
rendered payment.
City Not Obligated to Third Parties
The City will not be obligated or liable hereunder to any
party other than the Consultant.
8. Prior Agreements
The provisions of this Contract constitute the entire
agreement between the parties and supersede all prior
communications, representations, and agreements, oral or
written, between the parties hereto with respect to the
subject of this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their hands and seals
thi day and year first above written,
THOMAS EDWIN BLAYLOCK
ATTESTS
By }3Y
Title Title
ATTESTi CITY OF DEN`X'ON, TEXAS
By BY
Title Title
1979U/8
TALK ANALYSIS
DENTON PUBLIC UTILITIES PSA
Thomas Edwin Blaylock
March 1983
GOALSi To inform the general public about the Denton
Public Utilities system) how it serves the community,
and a basic overview in layman terms about how it works,
AUDIENCE: Denton citizens of all ages who are concerned
with how their tax dollars are spent within the Utilttya•:
Departments.
PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONSt This program will be a slide-
tape presentation approximately 20 minutes long,
TREATMENTi This program will be divided into 3 sections:
1, An introduction with a brief history of Denton's Uttltcy
works and the needs from which these came, This section
would include a description of life for the early pioneer
settlers and how the need for some form of community sant!a-
tiun developed as Denton grew from a frontier settlement
to a prosperous city during the latter part of the 19th
eenturys A particular incident to be brought to light
involves an a Typhoid epedemic in 1908 which took the liras
of many Dentonites and forced the city fathers into appro-
priating funds from local businesses in order to finance
a water purifacation system, This sequence krill utilize
copies of old tin-type photographs available through the
Emily Fowler Library and Denton Historical collection,
The sound track will include a running narrative and musts
of a historical, western themes( Billy the Kid Suite, by
Arond Copeland) New World Symphony by Dvor,jak )
The opening will last approximately 22-3 minutes and ser~,-e
as an interesting, unique angle to approach the subject
of city utilities$
21 A tour of Denton's water purifacation system beginning
with the pumping station at Garza Little 1:.lm Resevor~
and following the journey of water through the purifacation
plant, water mains, storage tanks, and finally to the home.
Interspersed within the visuals and soundtrack will be
descriptions of the various crews and operators involved
in the process, and an occasional narrative by one of the
workers describing a particular ,job.
From the home, the viewer will follow the journey of waste-
water to the treatment plant and back out to the lake,
The viewer will come away with a basic understanding of
the scope and complexities involved i,n the vital processes of
water purifacation and waste-water treatment, This segment
will approach the subject from an educational viewpoint and
be valuble material for high school and college level
science and biology courses. Mention will be made of the
city's practice of subcontracting water and sewer Install-
ation work to local contractors in the interest of stimulat-
ing local business, A running narrattve,sound effects, and
music of an ind rustrial nature will guide the viewer through
the process,
3. The electrical dept, will be dealt with in an identical
manner. we are given a brief description of the aaturo of
electrical energy and taken on a tour of a power generating
plant, transmission lines, relay stations, and finally
its arrival in the home, Along the way we will meet the
various crews involved in tho creation, distribution, and
maintenance of our electrical power system,
The program will close with a brief overview of how the
various utility depts. function as a whole, and a glimpse
of future problems and projects now in the planning stages.
BOGET PROPOSAL AND BUAKDQ4
1, NATEERIALS COST
A. CAMERA, LENS, AND ACCESORIES.
1, camera body and 50m,m, lens $7,50 daily
2. fisheye lens 7150
3, 28m,m, lens 7,50 "
4. 70»210m.m, zoom lens 7.50 "
5. macro lens 7,50
6. light meter 5,00 "
7, tripod 5100 "
DAILY TOTAL 740 , 00
WEEKLY TOTAL 7190100
B. SPECIAL FILTER PURCHASE
1, polarizing 715,00
2, flourescent $21.00
3, tungsten 521,00
4, daylight 721.00
5. filter adapter ring S21.00
"COTAL $100.00
C. LIGHTING EGUIPMENT RENTAL
1. Lowel Tota Light Kit WEEKLY TOTAL $200.00
D. SOUND EQUIPMENT RENTAL
1. Nagra Tape Recorder $70.00 daily
2. Lavalier condenser mike 515.00 "
3. Sennheiser 815 mike 525100 "
DAILY TOTAL 8110.00
WEEKLY 'T'OTAL $440.00
4, Recording tape
3 rolls at $15.00 TOTAL $45.00
SOUND TOTAL $485.00
E. FILM AND PROCESSING TOTAL. 7364.00
Price of film and developing 1 36exp, roll of slides =x13,00
28 rolls X $13.00 =$364.00
10 slides per minute X 20 minutes 200 slides
200 slides X 5 to 1 shooting ratio 1,000 slides
1,000 slides divided by 36( number of slides per roll)4 28rolls
28 rolls X $13,00 per roll = $364.00
F, ARTWORK- GRAPHICS
10 graphics at $30.00 per graphic = $300.00
TOTAL $300.00
G, LABOR COST
1, Script writing and research. ( 10 - 12 days) .$'700
2, Photography ( 7 days) $600
3, Sound recording ( location and studio) ( 4 days) $300
4, Cditing ( visual and audio) ( 7 days) $600
5. Sound mincing ( 3 days) $200
6, Narration ( 2 days) 00
LABOR TOTAL $2,5004
H. MISCELANEOUS EXPENSES
Gas to and from film labs and rental houses,
Long distance phone calls TOTAL $55.00
COST SUMMARY
MATERIALS
camera 0190
filters $100
lighting $200
sound equip. $485
film and processing $364
artwork $ 300
labor $2500
misc. $55
TOTAL Q4 , t94
.
RESUME
Thomas Edwin Blaylock (Ed)
416 Bryan Street
Denton, Texas
(817) 382-9403
OBJECTIVE: Desire challenging position in all phases of
production; writer, Producer, Director, Di-
rector of Photography, Cameraman, Soundman,
Editor. Primary interest in cinematography.
Also have experience in videotape.
EXPERIENCE: Casting and Assistant Director, Key Grip, Sound-
6-82 man, and Supporting Actor for "The Weakest Link,"
to feature-length dramatic videotape utilized in
present training of management personnel.
Narrator and on-camera talent for company pro
motional videotapes.
Narrator and on-camera talent for Eire-safety
videotapes for major high-rise hotels in Dallas.
National mechanical Corporation
Dallas, Texas
7-8-82 Soundman and Boom-mike Operator on sales training
to film for Mary Kay Cosmetics.
7-12-82
Rainbow Productions
Dallas, Texas
7-1-82 Teaching Aid for beginning film pr:-(luct:.ion class,
to
8-13-82 North Texas State University
Denton, Texas
1-82 Announcer for commercial 16 tract: recording sz-.zdio.
to
present inside Track
Denton, Texas
1-82 Teaching Aid for Radio-TV-Film Course, Actina
to for the Camera. Responsible for teCchingerama
5-82 and beginning Radio-TV-Film students function
and operation of TV studio (camera, switcher,
microphone, audio-board operation and studio
lighting.
N.T.S.U., Denton, Texas
Ed Blaylock (continued) 2
3-14-82 Key Grip on 30 sec. PSA for NTSU) telecast on
to all major Dallas/Ft. worth Stations,
3-15-82
8-30-81 Writer, Producer, Director of "Precision Fork
to Lift Operation," NTSU-Green Giant internship
12-10-81 designed for production course,TV for Business,
Industry, and Education. Responsible for entire
project and on-the-job training and supervision
of other students.
Green Giant warehouses, NTSU
Denton, Texas
6-7-81 Co-producer and Assistant Editor on "Rudi,"
to 16 m.m. documentary film.
7-30-81
New York City
4-7-31 Assistant Director and Key Grip on 16 m.m. docu-
to mentary film about United way agencies in Ft. Worth,
4-11-81 Texas
John C, Stevens Motion Pictures
Ft. Wort , Texas
5-1-80 News Cameraman, Switcher, and Audio-board
to Operator, Reporter-Announcer. Assisted in
8-30-80 production of news and commercials on local
cable news station.
Golden Triangle Communications, Channel 25
Denton, Texas
5-19-80 Announcer-DJ on classical music program. Pro-
to duced PSAs for broadcast.
8-30-80
KNTU-FM, Denton, Texas
6-1-78 Stage Manager responsible for equipment check-
to out to clients and in-house crews, Grip, Gopher,
8-30-78 Driver
Bill Stokes Associates
Industrial, Training, Sales Films and Commercials
Dallas, Texas
1-15-78 Cameraman
to
5-10-78 NTSU Physics Lab, Videotape Studio
Denton, Texas
Ed Blaylock (continued) 3 -
3-78 Soundman on movie-For-TV, "The Trouble with
to Hello"
4-78
Jim Gable Productions
EDUCATION & TRAINING$
Bachelor of Arts, Radio-Television-Film
North Texas State University
Graduate: 12-18-82
Courseworki 16 m.m. Cinematography
Editing
Sound Recording (studio and location)
Audiotape Dubbing and Editing
TV Camera Operation (studio and location)
Videotape Dubbing and Editing
TV Studio Operation (switcher, audioboard, VTR)
Lighting (motion picture and television)
Scriptwriting and Direction of TV, Motion
Picture (theatrical and non-theatrical)
Multi-media Programming
TRAVEL 1970 high school exchange student to Sweden.
Extensive travel throughout Northwestern Europe,
most of U.S.A., and Mexico
LANGUAGES Speak, read and write German and French.
PERSONAL Age 30, single, will travel, relocate.
References available on request.
i
i
/ I...Y.r..'.w+trY 1....1..«.mNt.HwM.. Ff.\rY NMtiwa.w H~Frn.. \ 1.
PUB Minutes 4-20-83
-7-
12. CONS IDl~ CHANGE ORDER 113 C-48-1188-03 WASTEWATER ` REATkKLNT
PLA :C~- ROM GRACON CON5TRUCTION COMPANY AND Rk: " E AND I C LS ,
INCORPORATED:
Ham briefed the Board by stating that this $8,440 Change Order
was for the construction of a manhole and a flume meter
inserted on the 12" s{de stream line of the effluent from the
Wastewater Treatment Plant. He added that the EPA indicated
that it would be an absolute requirement for the City of Denton
to measure the wastewater effluent leaving the Wastewater
Treatment Plant and that this Change Order was necessary to
comply with the EPA directive. Ham concluded by stating that
discussions were held with the Texas Department of Water
Resources, and indications are very favorable that subject
Change Order will receive 758 funding through the EPA grant.
After a brief discussion, Herring made a motion to recommend to
the City Council subject Change Order be approved. Second by
Cryan, four ayes, no naves, motion carried.
13. CONSIDER CONTRACT WITH ED BLAYLOCK FOR UTILITY VIDEO SLIDE
PROGRAM:
Nelson briefed the Board by stating that at the Public
Utilities Board Planning Session, the Board expressed an
interest in the Utility Department developing a video slide
program describing the activities and functions of the Utility
Department. Nelson then reviewed the attached agreement with
6d Blaylock to provide the professional services for producing
such a program.
Nelson mentioned that he would anticipate the slide program
being divided into three sections which would include:
1. A brief introduction of the history of Denton,'s utility
system;
2. A tour of Denton's water/wastewater system; and,
3. A tour of Denton's electric system.
Nelson added that the Staff reviewed a video tape of one of
Mr. Blaylock's efforts in this area and was very pleased.
Herring then made a motion to recommend to the City Council
that subject agreement for a video slide program be approved.
Second by Cryan, four ayes, no naves, motion carried.
j
' IQr
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM
;iUOJbC'i':
Consider Participation In Oversize (Above 10" Diameter) Of
Sanitary SewerLine From State Highway East 380 To Cooper Creek
Lift Station Serving Sandy Hills Mobile Home Subdivision And
Capricorn Mobile Home Park.
SUMMARY i
Subject to the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission
of the Sandy Hills Subdivision plat, the Staff submits the
following information:
1. Mr. Jim Griffis, developer for Sandy Hills Mobile Home
Subdivision, and Mr. Jack Browder of the Capricorn Mobile
Home Park Group, have asked the Utility Staff for guidance
and City assistance in the construction of a sanitary
sewerline to serve these two mobile home developments.
+ Capricorn Mobile Home Park currently exists outside the
City limits with city water and privately owned septic
tanks. Sandy Hills Mobile Home Subdivision is in the
planning stage, also outside the City limits. Both
developers desire City water and sanitary sewer service.
2. The sanitary sewerline size required to open up this vast
new area of development should be 8,750 feet of 18"
diameter pipe. It is estimatea that 100 mobile homes at
Capricorn would tap on to this sewer line when constructed
and an additional 150 mobile homes tapped on when Sandy
Hills Mobile Home Subdivision is completed. The proposed
18" sewerline would allow growth capability for other new
developments north and south of Highway 380 east.
3. The developers are willing to dedicate the sewerline and
easements to the City upon project completion. They will
also construct these sewerlines to city of Denton
regulations and specifications with proper engineering,
City review and approval.
1994U/5
SCAL 9UMMARXi
Total Cost of 18" Sanitary Sewerline
Oversize (estimate) $254,000
City's Share (estimate)
(Difference 18" from 10" sewer) 70,000
Developer's Share (estimate)
{1011 sewer) 184,000
Total Project Cost $254,000
Source of Funds - Water/sewer Bond Funds
ACTION RLQUIRr.D:
Approval or disapproval from City Council for participation in
subject oversize line.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Boara, at their meeting of April 20, 1983,
recommended to the City Council that developers be advised of
this oversize requirement and that the City intends to
participate in the funding of this oversize Sewerline from a
10" to an 18" aiameter. Developers would be advised that an
ayreement to pay for oversize will be established after bids
are opened and actual cost to the City of Denton is determined,
Respectfully,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
1994U/6
,
~i
• " ~ a
r
, y
11' r rr
,t + ,r
a7 a
~ b~ 1 ' Q97! HC6+ 8 7S0' t
r ISG: two: r. /
t i F~' y~ ,~:/4 'Y~, Ot• , '1 :.j~, ~~T l.T l~~yy~~ '1
y ~C ~+`4, 1 ~ of L
LliGUT~F
: 9d1 .4 1,~ if•~'.x'p,;yi..'~1 .l lt, 'rl,"•,,
,I .,Nr• r! ` J 1. ~ tct{j t \J,~ 1 M i' ++±J ,..Ti4k'}j~ •Z
t. ~ 4l t. ri
ON'
• v 2 , rl.rJ~r t i• X" } rt ~ ' n ~ ~ ,
Q. ~ t~ ~ + 'i rid. XI` 1'..t~„ " t ~ ~,(1
1.~ jf' t tP.• t5f,10 RCE`M ,IN j 'r~"♦
1 '?7 ,.i~_V: ~r • '`1 Re t ilk ~ + V .y,~ f~Tl' ~a:g~. /Y' ( r•r~
11 a r , T '_r " t~ "
K~ '4' ~T,.. try ; rf• u.. '
v: 1 h~/y~Wd_j~~n y, 'dr~;~' +d;+~ r' ti •'a ~r
`CREE}4',Q
1:•S jp4 ~r .,vIO,l(~4r+ I: '1': irl. „ I~".. .av ,:11 {
tfl,Y+•
M"P•,;"+"~ `YC~n,'~', +..~.tt~~~~l}••',',,• r~Q I`u,,,r IIIN1111Wjj/~~`~~L4~
4 y.q,M~ ' ~5r+u1. I N y .tp~ r. .r~-l Y • , l.. 'ti~.~ ~ ~
''.t.4+~ w/y4 rP ~1F4~fr', 1 r ~ r , ~Wll~ . ~Y} .y 1 .
~ I •ry Md .r•J11.~ •
5 , ~N I C ~Y.''t' ~ r 'rrrW CM'r1•', ~ ~r 7 !
, 1 Q ,tr, i , ' t'r': .T &t~ y i' +I }4:. ri.~ I,..•+ 5/~.
' Ir ' ^Xf!✓: ~ y ~`L, Y '`f~~~';•.(~r r ) ' a. y t~rLr. ' i
• A.:f~ (•I~ ~ •Vw ',\55..'`~`.,~'+1.1X'~-ali~rl~'wn~/''p\ ~~:t~i.' 1, t , ~u~~ ~_'~~4 . : y.j"~",..
PUB Minutes d-20-iT,
91 CONSIDER PARTICIPATION IN OVERSIZE Above 10" Diam to OF
S b C b R, ~jTATE HI(itiWAY T iQQ TO COOPER I
IFT STA N SERVING SANDY HILLS MOBILE ME SUBDIVISION ALND
CAPRICORN MOBILE HOME PARK:
Ham briefed the Board by stating that the developers of the
Sandy Hills Subdivision and Capricorn mobile home Park are
attempting to construct a sanitary sewerline from Highway 180
East adjacent to the Capricorn Mobile Home Park to the City of
Denton's Cooper Creek Lift Station. Ham added that the
original proposal was to build two lift stations and run a
force main which the City would not want to do because of
maintenance problems and operating costs involved with the lift
stations.' Ham stated that the 18" gravity line was a mare
feasible way to go and that the City should look at
participation in the cost of oversizing that line from a 10" to
18" and concluded by stating that the City's participation cost
would be approximately $70,000.
Cryan made a motion to recommend to the City Council that
subject participation agreement be approved. Second by
Loveless, four ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
10. CONSIDER PARTICIPATION IN LEGAL ACTION WITH DE;VLLOPERS OF S.l.NDY
HILLS MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION AND CAPRICORN MOBILE HOME PAR:ti TO
OBTAIN NECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINES;
Ham briefed the hoard by stating that the developers have asKed
the City of Denton to assist them in acquiring easements since
the waterline they plan to construct will become property of
the, City of Denton upon completion. He added that the
developers believe that without the City's i~elp, easements will
he impossible to obtain. Nelson pointed out to the Board that
this was a departure in policy and that the Ciry normally
requires all easements to be obtained by the developer.
Chairman Laney stated that he was uncomfortable in changing
policy on such a matter and would like to review the situation
in more depth. Herring then ,nade a motion to table this :item
to the next meeting of the Public Utilities Hoard. Second by
Cryan, four ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
11. CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER #31 CONTRACT C-48-1188.131 HICKORY CREEK
LIFT STATION FOR RED RIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY;
Ham briefed the Board by stating that subject Change Cider
consists of construction improvements to the wet well air
bubbler pipe system which were not foreseen at the time of
design. He added that this air supply is needed to pra•,,ent
sewage from becoming septic by increasing air flow to raw
sewage which may be retained for an extensive period of ti.-,.e in
the wet well. After a brief discussion, Cryan made a motion to
recommend to the City Council that subject Change Order be
approved. Second by Herring, four ayes, no nayes, motion
carried,
194
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITE61
SUBJE'CTi
Increase Coverage for Boiler & Machinery Insurance.
SUMMARYI
The Stuff has reviewed the coverage of the insurance policy
with the Arkwright-Boston Ins.rance Company issued February 17,
1983, and the underwriter evaluation of specific areas where
the coverage needs to be broadened. The Staff feels that the
following coverages and limits need to be includedi
FISCAL SUMMARY t
1. k~ir or Replacement:_
on two GE steam turbines of 12,650 KW
which are currently valued at Actual Cash
Value $ 2,300
2. Water Damage Limits
Increased tr.om $5,000 to $20,000 $ 323
3. Additional Expediting Expenses:
Increased from $5,000 to $50t0UU $ 4,01.8
4. "In use or 'Connected and Ready for
Use" Restriction will be deleted $ 2,050
5. Definition of Accident:
"Manifestation" wording broadened to
an occurrence definition $ 510
6. breakdown Coverage;
Two GE steam turbines of 12,65U KW
currently have limited explosion
coverage. This will be broadened to
breakdown coverage 6 21900
TOTAL $.121101
Source of funds; 610-008-0251-8802 For all except #2
#2- General Government Funds
1994U-25
K ~
NC'PION REQUIRLI)s
Approve or disapprove endorsement for the aciclitional coverage
in the amount of $12,IUI.
AVVERNATI VRS I
Not applicable.
STAFF IfECOMMENDA`I'ION %
The Staff recommends the additional coverage being offered as
an endorsement to the policy,
Respectfully,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
1994U-2b
V
May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUHJ4 t
Consider Purchasing Easements from Texas Municipal Power Agency
(TMPA),
SUMMARYi
In oraer to extend electrical aistribution lines to the north
and south out of the new Airport Substation, it will be
necessary to acquire right-of-way. TMPA has right-of-way for
their transmission lines to the north and south from this
station and have agreea to offer 15' of the west side of their
easement for our use. The proposed "Agreement for Easement
Assignment" and associated easements is attached herewith.
FISCAL SUMMARYi
Not available at present.
ACTION RLQUIRED1
Approval or aisapproval by City Council of subject "Agreement
for Easement Assignment" with TMPA.
M COMMENDATIONt
The Public Utilities board, at their meeting of April 20, 1983,
recommended to the City Council approval of this Agreement.
Respectfully,
R, L. Nelson
Director of Utilities
r.XHIBIT I Agreement for Easement Assignment & Associated Exhibits
1994U/20
rr1{31:, '1 1ICiWI.ET'1'wl'aAl'~I(AI'dD 322 111A,7, l2 4':Il:l'T/;6000 '1'Itla, ArR 14, -11i'0 3 10 i'12 AM (t) Ill
i
A(;RI~IIME'N1' FOR t tM;EMI NT ASEM.NMf NT
5 STATE OF TEXAt3 )
6 ) KNOW ALL MIWN BY 'fF•rOll liltl-:al't'i'; 9 t
7 COUNTY OF D51NTON )
li
9 THIS AGRCmwr is made and entered into by and between Texas
10 Municipal Powts+r Agency, a poliii.cal. s3ubdi.vioion of- the ;a1-ate of
11 Texas, ASSIGNOR, and thc: City of Denton, ASGIGNEr°
12
13 WI-IFIRI~A5, AG(376NOR hair, ar.quired certain proprriy rights and
'14 easements lor.a ted in Denton County and described in IMed Records
15 of said County is rallowsi
16
17 TRACT NUMt4LR VOLUME PAGE GRANT0R
19 T-1502-1)2 1131; 923 Willard L, F'eucht, et ux
20 T°1502-D3 1131 229 Malcolm M. Long, et ox
21 T-1502-DS 1163 996 Ft, Worth National 11an1<,Tr 1
2,? T-1502-D41 1137 0200 Maries Hampton
23 T_1502•-t)4;:' 1133 065 Trvit't Doyle & Joe Abbo't't
24
25 WHEREAS, ASSIGNEE has purchased a 1133 acre tract oV land adjacent
26 to ASSIGNOR'S easement on a•for,rsaid tract T-I`;0;2-D45 as recorded in
27 Volume 1105, Page 999 of said De*d Records, for the construction
?r3 of an electrical. substation and,
29
30 WHEREAS, AF3GIGNCC has need to construct oalec'trir,al distribution
31 circuity from said subcta•ti.on 'to the south -to FIMI Highway 1515,
32 and to the north to U.G. Highway 300 and,
33
34 WHI-REM-1), AGI.','CGNOR now desiress to assign to ASSIGNEE all its
35 rights, 'titlr!a and intereAsts in a par-tion o•f each of 36 easements and AG`yIGNEL dosiresc to ar_cepi the assignmervn
thereof;
37
313 NOW, THEREFORE, for tho rum of Ten Dollar: ($10100) and
39 other hood and valuable consideration, paid by
40 AGGIGNrE, the rer.eipt of which is hereby icknowlecq*d,
41 ASSIGNOR hereby assigns -to A1;3;CIyNCIi all oi' ARNG ;GNOf2'(3 right,
42 title and •interes-t in land to thrt portion of the above listed
43 property rights and easement's which are more pariir.ulirly
44 described in ai•tached Exhibits as I'ol'lows:
4 t.'i
46 EX1-11BIT TRACT NUMBER ACRES AMIIGNED
47
413
119 "A" T-1502°•D2 1 , 000
lz-p 0 ° D T- 15 0'2-D3 0 , 6;313
51 IC1 T°1`j02--D3 2 0 'IS8
`;;2 "1)" T -15 0 ;2- IWI 0 2BO
0'Z T-1 502_"1)421 0 1 111
54 `
SL It is F'xi:3re5s.I.y Under!rltoucl th~lt ACI!31:GNL.E sltlal.,l. he relslpori•- E
16 sibl.e for any amounts rEiqui.red to be paid io thc.1 fir?e•! !ni.mpli??
57 owner(s) of the aforesaid properties; which may ho required as
' l_
i~1rl~ a HCWLE'r'r•pAf;!(AIt1Y ~>~:olA 71? EDIT/3()00 WFD 61:q~ 41(74 PM (C)
~Q a retxult• of ihiti asaetignment and/or any esubt:smquent activit.iast by
59 ASSX(MEE on Tho land Yhum oscs;i,gned,
60
61 ASS:MNEE shall da%ign and locate ito lines with respect to
6w A391GNUIRIS '1301cv lines and the we?ioernmost R;I,ght-or••Way lino.
63 of ASSIGNCIR12, eamementm to meet all clearance criteria of the
64 National. Electri.col Safety Code, 1901 Edition, and such delaign
(45 shall tie suh jaoct to review and approval, of AGSIGNOR
66
67 'As additional consideration for the assignmont oV theme eaoements,
60 ASSIGNOR shall be hold harmlesz by A1313IGNCE against any claim ran
6'? account of claath) injury or damages r,es3ultincg From ASS'IGNEEr 16 use
70 of said oassem(ynts.
71
72 FURTHERMORE, it is understood that, if ABOIGNEE ever wishe% -to
73 abandon any or all of said easements, ASSIGNEE agrees; co prepore
74 and executy the necessary documents to complete reversion thereof
7`; To ASSIGNOR
76
77 ASSIGNEE) by acceptance of this assignment, agrees to keep, perform,
7E1 and -Fulfill, all terms, covenants, conditiorttx and obli.gationm
79 required to be kept, performed and fulfilled by ABSIGNOR with
130 respect to the easeme3nts hereby assigned ,
is 1
i32 EXCCUTED thiss„________.»..__..__day of„ W„_„_.r_..__..___, 1783,
93
04 CITY Or" DENTON) TEXAG
b5
0 6
07 iry__.
Ou
f~
9U
91 TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
9"
93
94 By
91:,
96
97 ATTEST
98
99
100
i01
i
i
i
T-PACKARD 32201A,7,12 IIUlT/30oo wizD, Ara 14 6, 1903, 11100 AM (G)
PAWS 1 HEWi.f.T
1 T^luo2-D8 F«XF~ItiilT "A"
~Y MIW1 rAMMYTwYN TwI ITV TI wI wY H.T YMr1 ASSIGNMENT of a portion of -the? might-of-Way acquired by Texas
5 Municipal, Power Agency from Wil'larld L. feucht, of ux, and
b recorded in Volume 1132, Pane 923, Denton County Records.
7
B The westernmost 1FS0 foot wide strip of said Right--of-Way, More
9 particularly described as followsi
to
11 BEGINNING at a point on the south line of said Right-of-Way,
12 said point being South 09 53' 4511 West 22,+1 feet, more or
13 legs, from the centerline point of entry of said Right-of-Way)
14
is THENCE North 01 451 3611 West 29,33 Poet, more or less)
16
17 THENCE North 41 13' 42" West 092,99 feet, more or le+ss1
is
19 THENCE North 01 49' 49" East 540,99 Poet, more or lass)
20
21 THENCE North 01 03' 10" Cast 934,60 Poet, more or lass}
22
23 THENCE North 01 02' 05" West 512,13 feat, more or less to
24 a point on the north line of said Right-of---day, paid point
25 being South 09 AV 47" West 22,50 feet, more or less, from
?6 the centerline point of exit of said Might-of-Way;
'7
28 THENCE with the north line of said Right-of--Way South 09 30' 47"
29 West 15,00 feet, more or lass, to the northwest corner of saij
30 Right-oi'-Way}
31
32 THENCE with the west line of said Fight-oF-Way as followsi
33 South 01 02' 0311 East 512,03 -rent, more or less)
34 South 01 03' 10" West 924,22 feet, more or less;
35 South 01 49' 49" West 6)46,$1 feet, more or less)
36 South 41 13' 42" Cast 893.52 feet, more or leas)
37 South 01 45' 30" Last 23,51 Feet, more or less to the
38 southwest corner of said Right-oP-Way)
39
40 THENCC with the south line of said Right-oF-Way North ti9 53" 45"
41 Cast 15,01 feet, more or less) to the place o-P b*ginning,
42
43 CONTAINING 1.00 acres of land, more or .less,
44
45
O41 S/R, 27
,
~ t.
I ~ ~ 5/z.og 51x.13
t ' 915,16' I ~ ,
J32,a7' f t
r
~9sS,lbr ~~892.18' ~ ~
92%a21 9tyio'_ 2r _
r , "6i.o PROPoItN at d. oR 75' wioe'
Ww PaR Vol, 1132 PC 923. t
' r
it ~ •
I Syi.T/ SY0.99'
fr ,
\ o e Aarf
j lN7l~A ARr~►,) \ t d9?.l a'
`i .993.52' 89L,9g'
r f E '
11,33' f
ax s/' !III
08Z'
I
g
i
s f
iSTFT
PAGE 1 HEWLETT-PACKARD 32201A.7,12 ED'TT/3000 WED, APR G, 1983, 11;01 AM (C)
1 r-ia02-D3 EXHUrr "Et" ,
-
3
4 ASSIGNMENT of a portion of the Right-o•r-Way acquired by Texas
5 Municipal Power Agency from Malcolm M. Long, F.t ux, and
b recorded in Volume 1131, Page 229, Denton County Records,
7
e The westernmost 15,0 foot wide strip of said Fight-of-Way, more
9 particularly described as rollowsi
10
11 BEGINNING at a point on the south line of said Right-of-Way,
12 said point being South 89 381 47" West 22.60 feet, more or
1
13 .less, from the centerline point of entry of said Right-of-Way
14
15' THENCE North 01 02' 05" Wart S,US,12. 60 feet, more or less to
16 a point on the north line of said Right-of-Way, said point
17 being North 89 14' 10" West 22 51 -F*et, Mork or ',less, from
18 the centerline point of exit of s4id Might-of-Way)
19
20 THENCE with the north line of said Right-of-Way North 09 14' 10"
21 West 15.01 feet, more or lest, to the northwest corner of said
22 Right-of-Way)
23
24 THENCE with the west line or said Right-oi'-Way South 01 02' 05" Ea~ll
25 1)332.89 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of said Right-
26 of-Way l
27
20 THENCE with the south line of said Right-of-Way North 89 38' 47"
2Y East 15.00 feet, more or :lees, To tho place of beginning
60
31 CONTAINING 0,630 acre of land, more or less,
32
3;1
N
►G1 cA N
Z
y
Q ~
%Nk
t4,,
w
%
b o . IN
u~i \
k ~a
A D
e r
m D
a
a
a
0, d RAPS IN 1fkS.S1c;A1 ,667-
3 ,19 ACRES IN EASEMENT- -Vol. 1131,
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE TEXAS PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM
DATC ACTIVITY NO. BY
10.15.81 OR16INAL ISSUE. ~ 1724
i0,zh,ol C~EViSEO 7; in
l#-143 4ss14;1vcD isl n b s1vro"v 3 ,s
TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AG5NCY
C~-~ 77& SERVING THE CITIES OP SCALE 0.400'•0 "
z +~;a BRYAN. DENTON GARLAND •GREENVILLE
DRAWING NUMBER
tit LCOLM vi.LoNG ET,UX VIV/AN A.
lO :p.
(96 AC. T=l.502 -03
PAGE 1 HEWLETT-PACKARD 32201A.7.12 EDIT/3000 WED, APR 6, 1903, 11101 AM (C)
1 T-1502-D5 EXHIBIT "C"
2
3
4 ASSXrNMENT or a portion of the Right-of-Way acquired by Texas
5 Municipal Power Agency from Fort Worth National Funk, 'trustee, and
6 recorded in Volume 1163, Page 966, Denton County Records
7
a The westernmost 15 0 foot wide strip of said Right-of'--Way, more
9 particularly described as followst
10
it SOUTH PORTION
12
13
14 BEGINNING at a point on the south line of said Right--of'-Way,
'L5 said point being North 09 14' 10" West 22,51 feet, more or
16 less, from the centerline point of entry of said Right-or-Way)
17
18 THENCE North 01 021 05" West 680.22 feet, more or less)
19
20 THENCE North 01 41' 36" West 579,46 feet, more or less)
~i •
22 THENCE North 20 09' i8" East 1,909,09 feet, more or less to
23 a point on the north line of said Right-of-Way, said point
24 being South 09 03' 00" West 24,12 feet, more or less, from
25 the centerline point o-f exit of said Right-of-Way)
26
17 THENCE with the north line of said Right-of-Way South 09 03' 00"
'28 West 16.05 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner o,r said
29 Right-of-Way)
30
31 THENCE with the west line of said Right-of-Way as followsi
32 South 20 09' 10" West 1,906,19 feet, more or less)
33 South 01 41' 36" East 552,27 feet, more or less]
34 South 01 02' 05" East 679.67 feet, more or loss to t•he
35 southwest corner of said Right-of-Way)
36
37 THENCE with the south line of said Right-of-Way South 09 141 10"
30 East 15.01 feet, more or less, to the place or beginning, this
39 {portion containing 1,091 acres of land, more or less,
40
41 SAVE AND EXCEPT the 0,087 acre portion within the aboua described
42 assignment located within a portion of tho 1.33 acre tract
43 acquired by the City of Denton From Fort Worth National Bank,
44 Trustee, and recorded in Volume 1195, Page 999, Denton County
45 Records, being the northern 254,00 feet thereof.
46
47 CONTAINING 1,004 acres of land, more or less.
4B
49 NORTH PORTION
50
51
BEGINNING at a point on the south :Line of said Right-or-Way,
53 said point being South 89 03' 00" West 24.1'2 feet, more or
54 less, from the centerline point of entry of said Right-of'-Way)
55
56 THENCE North 20 09' 10" East 59.01 feet, more or less)
57
PAGE 2 HEWLETT-PACKARD 32201A,7,12 EDIT/3040 WCD, APR 6, 1'7x;3, 1101 AM (C)
v0 THENCE North 01 12' ?6" East 20944,00 feet, More or lee% to
59 a point on the north lino! 01' said Right-of-Wray, said point
60 being North 00 33' 07" Wiest 212,50 feet, more or l alas) from
61 the centerline point of exit of said Right-of-Way)
62
63 THENCE with the north lane of said Right-of-Way North 130 33' 07"
64 West 15.00 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of said
65 Right-of-Way)
66
67 THENCE with the west line of said Right-of-Way as Followsi
60 South 01 12' 26" West 21)941,56 feet, more or leases)
6Y South 20 091 10" West 62,30 feet, more or less to the
70 southwest corner of said Right-of-Way)
71
72 THENCE with the south line 0 said Right-of-Way South 05 43' 30"
73 Cast 16.08 feet, more or less, -to the place o•f beginning,
74
75 CONTAINING 1.034 acres of land, more or leise.
76
i
i
}
1 , t
• 'C
DitJIra X393 + 1 y
1 N ~ti
r
I / I q
1
i IN bh! y17N 1J9!' t4 o
H
r
r A tie Qq ~ a
/9/3 oa aM q~A' '
s3s 'Mls awq, V e
+A
1
wue,.a PROAtRYY & as 7S' W/DQ
R/w PIK ve4, 1163 Pa. 560 LC IS
1.33 At PCk VOL. ~1$S, pq~999,
1 1 M ~
1 W Mh ~ r}, V1
n m
L1oZ o
~ o o
{
b to
1 _
i • t 1 N ~ ~ M ~:.1
Igr.e .~•109H0 :dP.lwun '.IC;r)
i 15, d v
„ /toa~ aa15o' I A I
`1 " ' I
.
4+i -.I
i
i
III
L3SAA C~rY f313~' • • y
I or biNTON ~
575 7OW4, Y ISot•bS<S)
' 691'
9~l'-s1 k- I
wkeL.r V Plot VOL." Y 8 d' co 96' wfsle ' .
i'►/w PiR veII43, 1'4, 54,64 L`SS
1 1139 ks, P!A VOL. II$5, P4, 999,
1 I
Q• ~
N a
~ a
N'
,
W
Q
~,i .5910!' ¢SN•o8~ h I
hum
,
~f,: •E. CIT OR 1 vv t o@ 24
12
,
DelstoN 6•
I ,aaNli~s'la
~tiva :ag>roaKo :HMVUO
r'
ICI
1
II~ ~ i
.
PAGE 1 HEWL.E:TT-PACKARD 32201A,7.12. EDIT/3000 WED, APR 4, 19!131 11101 AM (C)
1 T-I%OC -D41 EXI-IVilT "n"
2
3 '
4 ASSIGNMENT of a portion of the Right-of-•Way acquired by Texan
5 Municipal Power Agency Prom Maries Hampton) and recorded in
u Volume 1137, Page C00, Denton County Records,
7
8 The westernmost 15,0 foot wide strip of said Right-oF-Way) more
9 particularly described as followal
10
11 BEGINNING at a point on the south line of said Right-oi'-Way,
12 said point being North 9£i 33' 07" West 22 ,50 Feet, more or
13 leas, from the centerline point of entry al' said flight-of-Way,
14
15 THENCE North 01 121 2611 East 814,51 feet, more or less to
16 a point on the north line of said Right-o-f-Way) said point
17 being North B7 40' 4v'! Went 2C.50 feet, more or leas, from
18 the centerline point of exit of said Right-o-P-Way)
19
20 THENCE with the north line of said Right-of-Way North 07 40' 4411
21 West 15,00 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner o-F said
212 Right-of-Way)
23
24 THENCE with the west line of said Right-of-Way South 01 121 26" West
25 0114.74 feet, more or less, to the sou-thwnst corner of said Right-oV--
26 Way)
Y)
~0 THENCE with 'the south line of said Right-ol'-Way South £38 33' 07"
29 Cast 1500 feet, more or less, 'to the place o•1' beginning
30
31 CONTAINING 0,280 acre of land, more or less.
32 ,
33
2z,sar .
rRVlrrooYl.E
I~
~.r._„ 15
U.S. NWY N° 380
tk~
°w
fp~r WOF?rH vArloAlAL BANK mus'rEE
I,S. do'~ •
' 22.50,
a
v ,
0, 2 8 AakES I11 ~S.T /u<NM6~11' 7'0 DERV ro,v
0, 98ACRES /N EASEMENT"
BEARINGS ARE BASEDON THE TEXAS PLANE COCJRDINATE SYSTEM
DATE ACTIVITY No. BY
10.15.81 ORIGINAL ISSUE 1 T,bi
• i •SS 'n ~ ASS 1 ~GN1 M E fJ'T c Es
3
?4{V! •T TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
c SERVINGTN6 CI'f1ES0A 5CALE 1'n 300'-0
7 BRYAN • DENTON, GARLAND • GREENVILLE
DRAWING PIU~dBER
N
LAJ N1ARlES HAMPTON (24AC,) T-1502 - 041
PAGE 1 H#:WI,V'T-PACKARD 32201A 7-12 ED'T/3000 WED, AI'I'2 13, l~i'C13, 4130 PM (C) 1
1 T-1502-D42 EXHT.0I~ T-"Ell
4 ASSUNMENT o•F a portion of the Right-of-Way accluir%ed by Texas
5 Municipal Power Agency from Truitt Doyle and ;Poe Abbott,
b and recorded in Volume 1133, Page 1360, Denton County Racnrds,
7
a The westernmor•t 15,0 foot wide strip of said Right-of-Way, being
9 the southernmost °10,0 feet thereof, mor,a particularly describe.td
10 as followsi
11
12 EEUMN'ING at a point on the south 3. ins of said Right -•of-Way,
13 said point being North 07 31' 313" Wast 22,50 -Feet, more or
14 le%%, from tho centerline point o-f entry of maid Right•-of-Way1
15
16 THI_NCE North 01 12' 26" East 50,00 feet, more or lens;
17
to THL:NCE North f07 31' 30" Wost 15,00 'feet, inure or leas, to the west
19 line o•F said Right-of-Way}
1 THENCE with the west line of said Right-of-Way South 01 12' 26" West
22 50,00 feet, r+ure or less, to the southwest corner of saaid Right-of-
23 Way;
24
25 THENCE with the south line of said Right-of-Way South 07 31' 38"
26 Cast MOU feet, more or less, to the place of bf:Iginning.
27
213 CONTAINING 0,017 acre of land, more or lose;.
29
30
M/GORED t~ERNICE SM/rH~~~ /5'
L
.
N.
o W ti
uuii V '
U
• r
22,5
elv *r
a U.5.HW Y N9 380
o - - ---•-I 1-4--.15
MARES NAMrtlll
,
0,02,46RE•5 hVA5SI4AIMA5NT
1.61 ACRES /N EASEM6'10- - VOL,, 11335 F>Cy. g/a5
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE TEXAS PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM
DATE ACTIVITY No. BY
I0-15.01 QRlGINAL 15SUE.
4-1-83 SSIGntC,~ 5' d n DEtJ7nnf 2 C,S
TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY ScAz~ I'~?OO' o"
SERVING THE CITIES OF
BRYAN • DENTON - GARLAND • GREENVILLE
z J DRAwINGNUMBER
rRUlrr DOYLE /6..i n^AC.1 'r- 1502-0 92
c` r•,... a U06 A B B T T
' ♦ w. • • 1-•.•..•.\•1-F.•M•••.\.. •.FUF\.•••.\.. . w.l wF♦• • ..•.•\.F.4 .♦MF.~M\.•ti ~Fr•F. w...
pUB Minutes 4-20-3
-5-
6. CONSIDER FUNDING AND PURCHASE OF THE SYSTFAM CONTROL AND 5ATA
ACQUISITION (SCADA) FOR THE RAW WATER PUMP STATION AND WATER
PLANT%
Ham briefed the Board by stating that this was a remote control
system and capable of starting arLd stopping motors and puin.ps,
opening and closing valves at the Raw Water Pump Station. He
added that the low bidder was Advanced Control Systaa-ms,
Incorporated out of Atlanta, Georgia and that the total, pacXage
would cost $32,077 and recommended that the Advanced Control
Systems bid be accepted. Herring made a motion to recommend to
the City Council that the SCADA system be purchased drom
Advanced Control Systems, Incorporated of Atlanta, Georgia, in
the amount of $32,077. Second by Cryan, four ayes,, no nac,es,
motion carried.
7. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD OF BID FOR PECAN CREEK DAM;
Ham briefed the Board by stating that there were five (5)
bidders on the project, bidding prices that ranged from a low
bid of $55,518 to a high bid of $95,370. Chairman Laney asked
if this was, part of the Felix Callahan settlement. Neilson
replied that it was and added that the City has held up on
awarding this bid in order to examine various alternatives
which would include an in-house effort to build the cam.
Nelson added that the review of these alternatives were not
very favorable. Cryan than made a motion to recommend to the
City Council that Jay-Mar Corporation be awarded the bid in the
amount of'$55,518. Second by Laney, three ayes, no nayes, one
abstention (Herring), motion passed.
8. CONSIDER PURCHASING EASEMENTS FROM TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AG.:tJCY
(TMPA) :
Tullos briefed the Board by skating that in order. to extend
electrical distribution to the north and south ouc of the new
Airport Substation, it would be necessary to acquire
right-of-way. He added that T~1PA has the right-of-Tway for
their transmission line to the north and south from this
station and have agreed to offer 15' of the west side of t.neir
easement for our use. Tullos concluded by stating that i'MPA
has offered these easements for a total of $10. Herring then
made a motion to recommend to the City Council that sutr.,ect
easement purchase be approved. Second by Cryan, four ayes, no
nayes, motion carried.
CI'T'Y OF DIMON
~S li ~1 0 R A N D 0 M
Ilf1'I'E OF hfl G'l'iNG; fMla lot 1983 CI'T'Y COUNCIL AGUNDA ITT USE BXACT WORDING AS 1' EMMI 1S '1'00 r Bk
PLACH ON AGI:NDA)
Consider approval of contracts for teaching defensive Driving
Course,
SUMMARY:
During the review of the purchasing policies and contract
procedures, it calve to our attention that we do not have
contracts for people that teach defensive driving. Currently,
there are 6 poople that teach the course. The City Attorney
has reviewed all 6 and finds thom to be in compliance with the
charter and all of our ordinances.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Instructors are paid by the City from special funds derived
from funds collected from persons attending the Defensive
Driving Classes. In several of these instances, contracts will
not exceed :3,000.00.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council should approve the contracts.
ALTERNA'I'.I VES :
Council could not approve the contracts.
ST I F RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the contracts.
I:;XHIBITS:
1. Memo to G, Chris Hartung
11. Copies of Contracts
Ric e i a
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817,1 566.8200
TO: G. Chris Hartung
FROM: Rick Svehla
DATE: May 4, 1983
SUBJECT: COnt)'actS for Defensive Driving 'T'raining Porsoiuiel
During the reviev of the purchasing policies and contract
procedures, it ramo to our attention that we do not have
contracts for people that teach defensive driving. In several
of these instr,nces, contracts will not oxcred $3,000.00.
However, staff felt that it was appropriate for the Council to
review and approve all of the contracts for it ll of the
teachers. Currently, there are 6 people that teach the
course. Copies of these contracts are, itic Iticied for the
Council's reviow, 'T'he City Attorney has rev iowed all 6 any
finds them to be in compliance with the charter and all of our
o r d itlances.
If you 1 e any fUrther questions, please call,
Rfc v e 1171 a
Assistant City Manager
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR'S AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTSi
COUNTY OF DENTON §
The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Home Rule Clzy
situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City',
acting herein by and through its City Manager, and
John G. Ma.xwP11 , hereinafter called Contractor, herec;:
mutually agree as follows:
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED:. City hereby retains Contractor
to perform the hereinafter designated services and Contract-,c
agrees to perform the following services:
A. Instruct Defensive Driving Classes as assigned.
2. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONTRACTOM City agrees to pa.-
Contractor for the services performed hereunder as follows:
A. Seven Dollars ($740) for each student taught
payable at the completion of each class taught,
3. SUPERVISION AND CONTRUL BY CITY: It is mutually understccc
and agreed by and between City and Contractor that Contractor -a
an Independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or cor.-
sidered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas for the purposes
of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation ±r
sick leave benefits, or any other City employee benefit. The C:t
shall not have supervision and control of Contractor or a:.;
employee of Contractor, but it is expressly understood that
tractor shall perform the services hereunder at the direction
and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of uenc:-.
or his designee under this agreement.
d. SOURCE OF FUNDS: All payments to Contractor under tn'agreement are to be paid by the City from special tunas deri.e:
from funds collected from persons attending the Defensive Dri'::c:
Classes.
5. SERVICES AND SUPPLIES TO BE FURNISHED dY CITY, C
agrees to furnish to Contractor the following services and supplies:
DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURS'd CONTRACT-PAGE ONE
i. i.oeation to teach Dutuns ive Uri vIng Looursu cIasaus
and all materials and equipment necessary to con-
duct those classes.
6. INSURANCE: Contractor shall provide at his own cost and
expense workmen's compensation insurance, liability insurance, and
all other insurance necessary to protoct Contractor in the
operation of Contractor's business.
7. CANCELLATION: City or Contractor reserves the right to
cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party thirty
(30) days written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement.
8. TERM OF CONTRACT This Agreement shall commence on the
1st day of April, 1483, and end on the 31st day of Murch, 1984.
BXSCUTED the this 1st day of April, 1983.
CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS
BY:
• CHRIS t t NG -
CITY MANAGER
A'CTEST
MOTTE ALLEN, L t Ait
APPROVED AS TO LflGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
.
B1'.
CONTRAC'T'OR
BY; lam, 77 ,
That John G. Maxwell, is hereby designated as the person to
administer the provision of this agreement.
I
I. Location to teach Defensive Driving Course classes
and all materials and equipment necessary to con-
duct those classes,
b, INSURANCE: Contractor shall provide at his own cost an -a
expense workmen's compensation insurance, liability insurance, ano
all other insurance necessary to protect Contractor In t:e
operation of Contractor's business,
7, CANCELLATION: City or Go ntracto r reserves the right to
cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party thirty
(30) Says written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement,
8, rum OF CONTRACT: This Agreement shall commence on t;.e
1st day of April, 1983, and end oo the 31st day of March, 1984,
hxECUTED the this 1st day of April, 1983,
CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS
B 1'
G. CHRIS TURL;
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
B1': r' 4,v L, 1~a 1
i
CO1'TRACTOR
BY:
That John G, Maxwell, is hereby designated as the person to
administer the provision of this agreement,
A l.. 1 M: . Gi.
DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE CONTRACT-PAGE 11W
CJjt,' STATE OF TEXAS 9
KNOW ALL dlr:N ilY 'L'lIE5E PRi:5ENT5 r
COUNTY OF DENTON
The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal iiumo Rule Ci
situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City
acting herein by and through its City Manager, and
Tillman Uland herolnaftor called contractor, here-!
mutually agrea as (0clo'a5;
1. SL'RVICES TO ,7E PERFORMED: City hereby retains Contract::
to perform the hereinafter designated services and Contract::
agrees to perform the following services:
A. Instruct Defensive Driving Classes as asaignod.
2. CCMPENSATION TO 13E PAID CONTRACTOR; City agrees to g.tr
Contractor for the services performed hereunder as foilowst
A. Seven Dollars 1$7.00} f c r each student taught
payable at the completion of each class taught.
y. 5UP6RVISION A6D CON_fi<OL BY CITYi It is mutually underst:::i
and agreed by and oatween City and Contractor that Contractor
an independent Contractor ane shall not be deemed to be or
sidered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas for the pUrpo:s.es
of income tax, withholcding, social security taxes, vacation
sicX leave benefits, or any other City employee oenufit. The
sha II not have supervLsion and control 0f Contractor or
employee of Contractor, but it is expressly understood that
tractor shall perform the services hereunder at the direction
and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of Oen::n
or iii:; designee un,ler agreement.
4. SOUi:~'E OF YLE:iDS: All payment:: to Contractor riser
agreement are to re paid by the City (coin special funds aerz,
from (undo Collected trom persons attond:ny the Defensive Dr:._
Glaser..-,.
~.;IiHIGl:S_AND_SUP?Ur:3 TO i,F, FUf~; I13HEL) PCX CI1'Y7 _
to furniu1~ Ca Contractor t;ia following .:_rvicas ane
uupnlivs:
'T'i'A<. ,
CJ;;
06's
1 Lo Cat IUIV LU L'.:ac 11 1W'Ulis tl"J I•I 11111 r, UU 111 oe d1.I 1
and a.ll materials atxr equipmlunt necussary to con -
duct thoso classos,
6, INSURANM Contractor shall provide at his own cost and
expense workmen Is compunsatIon insurance, Iiabliity insurance, aria
all other insuranco necessary to protect Contractor in the
operatlot% of Contractor Is business.
CANCGI,LAT[UN: City or Contractor roso rves the right to
cancel this Agreemont at any time by giving the other party thirty
(30) days written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement,
8, TERM OF CONTRACT: Phis Agreomunt sha11 commence on the
1st day of April, 1983, and end on the 31st day of ?larch, 1984,
ESTiCUTED the this 1st day of April, 1983,
CITY Of DhNTON, TLXAS
BY:
(37-TIT-5 HAR ITZ;
C11'Y >IANAGEK
ATT8SI•
Hit<LO1"rIL>-N ,7 f[T EG; Ii71`VRN
APYROVLD AS TO LEGAL FORA
C. J. 'T'AYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CON1'RAG I'Dk
that John G. Maxwell, iS huruhy de,i,t..iated as tllc persolt to
uJdmintstcr thu provi.;ion uC this agrcemont,
13i', If.
lin 4~i-iP.!N6 l.'1' ~,J\1..:1 t''~':oil I
THE STATE OF T: XAS g
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS1
COUNTY OF DENTON 5
The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Hume Rule Ciz.
situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City'
acting herein by and through its City Manager, and _
Njorle Uiand , hereinafter called Contractor, here:
mutually agree as follows:
1. SFRVICES TO BE PERFORMED: City hereby retains Contrac-
to perform the hereinafter designated services and Contrac::c
agrees to perform the following servicest
A. Instruct Defensive Driving Classes as assigned.
2. COMPENSATION TO HE PAID CONTRACTORt City agrees to orb
:.-actor for the services performed hereunder as follows:
A. Seven Dollars {$7.00) for each student taught
payable at the completion of each class taught.
3. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY: It is mutually uflue rs't:•:•_°
and ayreed by and between City and Contractor that Contractor
an independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or
sidered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas for the purposes
of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation
sick leave benefits, or any other City employee benefit. The
shall not have supervision and control of Contractor or a
employee of Contractor, but it 1s expressly understood that
tractor shall :erform the services her,-n-3er at the direction
and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of Dan:rr:
ur iris designee under thin agreement.
4. SOURCE Of' FUNDSI All payments to Contractor under s
agreement are to be paid by the City froi; special Luna; der.,:.:
from !:un(!s collected from persons attendiny the Defensive
Classes.
5. SERVICLEi AND SUPPLI S TO 131: FURN1SHE1) BY CM, _
agrees to furnish to Contractor the faIlowinq a,+rvicea an
~ supplt~s:
1 BLit"'dlS f'.s rjtirv -jJ: C')U a1. i'~~ff'~':•7:•'°" .
t, LoC,lt1 11 t.~~ tv.,I OvIQi l.,15u '!I wti lbe clansas
and all materials and u(I ulpiaunt Ii ecossary to con-
duct t hose classes,
b, INSURANCE; Contractor shall provide at his own cost an.i
expensu workmen's compensation insurance, liability Insurance, and
all other Insurance necessary to 1) rotoct Contractor in tte
operation of Contractor's business,
7. CANCELU'r ioN : City or Contractor reserves the rI>ht
cancel this Agrooment at any time by giving the othur party thirty'
(3U) days writton notice of its intention to cancel this Agreeaent.
8, TERM OF CONTRACT ThIs Agreemunt shall commence on the
1st dny of April, 1983, and end on the 31st day of March, 1984.
EXECUTED the this 1st day of April, 1983,
CI'1'1' 01: DENTON, TEXAS
b 1' ;
l~ Cillt IS AR MM;
Ci'1'Y MANAGIiit
AT FL- 6 1'
C,iAT R[,O f'M 1 L i , G1'[' SEGR :'I RI
APPROVED AS TO LLG,1L FORM
C. J, TIYLUR, JR. CI'1'1' AnORNEY
~ I
CON]RALTOR
That John G. M".-cwvII, is hereby designated as tau persun
administer the provision of Luis arr,rr.ement,
I)i'. ii:;,, ,'i i ii,1i11.`. .,i dli'.o f'. Lai,,\'~;,V',:r •':11i.,
THE STATE: OF TEXAS 3
KNOW ALL M"N BY THESE PRESENTS I
COUNTY OF DBNTON 5
The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Home Rule Ci:;
situated in Denton county, Texas, hereinafter called "City"
acting herein by and through its City Manager, and
William D Scott hereinafter called Contractor, heree•!
mutually agree as collows: '
1, SERVICES TO BE PERFONMED: City horeby retains Contractu:
to perform the hereinafter designated servicos and Contract,:
agrees to perform the following servicos:
A. Instruct Defensive Drivinq Classes as assigned,
21 COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONTRACTOR, City agrees to pay
Contractor for the services performed hereunder as follows:
A. Seven Dollars (37.00) for each student taught
payable at the completion of each class tauyht,
3, SUPERVI3ION AND CONTROL BY CITIY: It is mutually underst',,;.:
and ayraad by and between City and Contractor that Contractor
an independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or cc.-.-
sidered an employee of the City of Denton, 'T'exas for the purpos,: e
of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation
sick leave .)merits, or any other City erployee benefit. The C.:
shall not have supervision and control of Contractor or a!
employee of Contractor, but it is expressly understood that C:c-
tractor sha!.1 perform the services hereunder at the direction
and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of Uen:c
or his do:;ignee under this agreement.
4. SOURCS OP MOD_; All paynent3 to Contractor under
ayreement are to be paid by the City from apecial fun.::; eerr,._
.ro;n funds collected from persons attending the Defensivu Driv:*.
Clafi3 eo.
5. SERVICES AND SUPPLL3S TO Bc FURNISHLED BY C:ITY':
agrees to furnish to Contractor the following survic,yG an; .
;t~:."1aiIV; u.;1V1,:G 1:011la;;F. C,J;iPRAr 1'-P.1(;E v6S
r
1, Luc it tion to It ui+ctt UutuIt sieu urging Cunrsu dosses
and all maturiaIs and equipment necussary to con-
duct those classes,
6, INS URAN CE: Contractor shall provide at his own cost ir.:
expense workmen's compensation insurance, liability insurance, 4:L:.
all other insurance necessary to protect Contractor in :r:t
operation of Cunt ractorIs business,
7. CANCELLATION: City or Contractor reserves the right
cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the othur party thi:t"
(30) days written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreeme.:.
8, mot of CONTRACT: This Agrocmont shall commence ou
1st day of April, 1983, and and on the 31st day of March, 1984,
EfiECUTLD tIt e this 1st Jay of April, 1983,
CI YY OF DL,N1,u,N, 1'EV\s
t
BY
CITY XANAG;R
A 1- ['F S
IAR A' I: ALLEN, MT-S-1-MI LTAR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR, JR. , CITY AT'fuRNEY
CONTRACTOR
I't
That John G. Maxwe!i, is hurubg desih!naLou as tltu porsort
adrinistur the provision ut this agreement.
1, I~ 11' d X,-N, 'o,
tf li
_ it I'Y I'iAl: Jll I1 ,i ,.'.)11HJP,
rNi4 STATE OF TEXAS S
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS i
COUNTY OF DENTON S
'rne City of Denton, Texas, a MunicIpa I Home Rule C i t
situated in Denton County, Tuxils, hereinafter called "City
acting herein by and through its City ,Vanagor, and
Luis Scobee , hereinafter called Contractor, hereo;-
mutually agree as to I lows;
1. SERVICFS TO DE PERFOILNED% City hereby retains Contractor
to perform the hereinafter designated services and Contractor
agrees to perform the following servicesr
A. Instruct Defensive Driving Classes as assigned.
2. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONTRACTORi City ayrees to p3:'
Contractor for. the services performed hereunder as follows;
A. Seven Dollars ($7.00) for each student taught
payable at the completion of each class taught.
3. SUPFP.VISION AND CONTRUL BY CITYr It is mutually understOC-'
and iyreed by and 'ootween City and Contractor that Contractor :s
an independent Contractor and shall not be doemed to be or
sidered an oinployee of the City of Denton, Texa,. for the purpose.:
of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or
sick leave benefits, or any other City arnployee onnefit. The Ci:%
shall not have supervision and control of Contractor or any
employee of Coni.ractur, but it is oxpressly understood that Con-
tractor shall. perform the services hereunder at the uirectiun .
and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the CIL], of Derv
or his designee under this agreain ent.
d. SOURCE OF FUNDSr All payments to Contractor under cis
agreement are to ue paid by the City €rom special LUndu darn:
from funds Coll,?cted from persdn3 attending the De Lenn I VB DC
Clas3u3.
5. SERVIC:S A'1D S(J PN,IES '10 HI_FU!. ISH_1) B7 ",ITYY:
a.lrnae to €urnish to Co 11tIaCt') r L11o fu11uwinq jurvic,~o nm1.
.iuppl I ~r,:
I, Loeatlua Lo teach 0~ICI1.i I4Q LI'lS lllg I.OUl Clila8a.;
and all materials and oyuipment nucessary to con-
duct those classes.
6. INSURANCE: Contractor shall provide at his own cost and
expense workman's compensation insurance, liability insurance, anu
all other insurance necessary to protect Contractor in the
operation of Contractor's business.
7, CANCELLAT[ON; City' or Contractor resorvos the right to
cancel this Agreement at any tune by giving the other party thirty
(30) days written notice of its (rituntion to ca11ce1 this Agreement.
8. TERM OF CON'T'RACT: This Agreement shall commence on the
1st day of April, 1983, and end on the 31st day of March, 1984.
IIXECUTLU the this Ist day of April, 1'J83.
CHI' Of D NTON, ThXAS
B1:
U. CHKIS lick UN G
CITY ~IANAUEK
AT'f EST
LIARLO' 'L* ,SLL-', , ( Sllk L. r}tl
AP PAUVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. "TAYLOR, JR., C11'1' ATT0101:1'
~ ~ rr
CON'rRAl T'Uk
I'll at Jolul G. DIax.veil, is here'uy designit tud :ls L h u person
adrninistur the provision of this :IZreoinent.
llrill I: l.Il i :•l rliA'e1611 kt
I
II131~L:ti'~I11', I)itl~'l:0Li '.:L'iIItSL C{)I'-I',11i1: 'I1,11
1N'U4PhSUliN'Y' CIIN'l'RAC'I'UR'S AGlRLINl:1N1'
fHEi 51'Al'G UP I'IiSrIS ~
hNUii ALI, Ml BY IHhSL PRBShN'N:
CUUN'l'1' OF 1)BNTUN S
'I'Ile City of Denton, 'loxas, a Municipal 1101110 little laity
sit uuit od in Denton County, I'll xit 5, 11 er0 111,1ftcr Called "City'
acting herein by and through its City Manager, and
Joan Davis horeinaftor called Contractor, here:
mutually agree as follolrs:
1. SLMICI:S 1'0 Ifli PURFU011"i)_ City Ituruby retains Contl'act,.:
to porforrn the hure iaafter designated services and l,ontracLull,
a Y,roes to perform the IUllowing sorvicus:
A, Ill st rIlCIt Def ell Si Ve I)1'iV i119 CIas S e S IS :I95kgnod,
CUMPLNSA'fIUN 1'0 BL PAID CUN'i'KACItUR; City agvous to pa":
Coritractor for the services performed heroun~ler as follows:
A. Seven Dullars ($7,00) for )111211 student taught
payable at the completion of oacrl class taught.
3. SUPURVISIISN AND CUN'I'KUI, BY Cl'I'): It is Illltuailr under
and igroud by and betis ooit Citq and Gen trit Ctur lh•it Contractor .
.ut iit du1) eit doii t Contractor and shit II not be doomed to be oc con -
s I de red all a111i1loyee of the City of Denton, Texas to1• the purpo 9..
tf l11COme tax, Is it hh01ding, social security tax05, vac aIt iun or
sick leave buneflts, or any otller City employee b011efit. the
shall not have supervi,L;On and control ut Contractor or any
employee of Contractor, but it is oxpre!;siy 0nderstood that C:
tractor s11a11 poriornl tho services hcrunnaer at the directlu'l
.lad to the satislaccion of the City )tanager of the City or oc-,1-- r
or ais designee under tnis igrcument.,
-1. SUUKCF OF FUNDS: All paynlcnts to ColltvactOr under t;.
a4reeIll ell t are to 11 12 p;tid by tee Cit? from speciai fends dklI, -
from Funds cnllaCtod from persons Ittondi11 the. Uct,:nsive 1) r1.~ -
c,iusses,
5. SLO,iCIiS iN1) "1110 1'1,11:5 Ill [!,l: F010I ilFU It? ~iV C I t
J J'0rS to fUrllish to font l'ac for tlic lot I)w, it}', se rvico s alld:ul'
supplies:
0 LI•L,\511'11 DR ll'IXG t:ullli,iV.. CO,\IAACi-PzOd: f) M.
Y, Lo<atIoil to teach Du foils iea Driving t:elll,so classes
Wild ate urltoIli it Is m1d uclillpmont uuuuss+II'y to Colt-
i1llCt these CYits5a8,
I.VS 1) It AN C 1, CoIt trLi ctoI, shalt 1)ruVlao at I I I s own go9t fin,i
axponse workman's compunsat1olt YnsuriutCC, liability insurance, „n.
aIi othor insur:utcu nucossary to protect C0111:rxctot, 111 1tie
operation of Contractor's husiness,
1, C.1NCY:LL,t'I'IONI I;Ity aI, Contractor resorvus the right t.;
cancel this Agra umant at any time by gIV I Iv. the other part)' thlr-
C30) Jays '.vrIt tun hence of its i11 tantlon to caacul this Agrue;ia1
I'iilt" 01: CON'1'RACi I'his Agrownunt shall cormnurtcu on tltu
Ist day of April, Y?93, 1110 and on CIIU 31st clay ul tlarcIt , 1J3I
iiXli(;i)'rut) t}w this 1st day of AlII.II. 1983.
CI I'1 UI: 1)L\'tu\, 11:X\S
RY;
CIS-1ITA CQNt
Cl i Y MANAGl:k
AtFhST
trTTliTu'TT~`aTT~~ TTlR
APPRUI'bU AS I'U 1116AL FOAII
C. J, iAILUK, JA , CITY AI'[OWN:Y
b 1 : J'_ _
la1,ITRAi:'i DR
Cleat J(1 hn G. 'laxwuII is Hereby Iusl lulte(l as thr 1) x54)11
,I<lii inister the 1)rovls10 11 of this agreement,
i)H:k b I1'I. IN i V I \li Li ~IHlbtr. Cu ( I i<;l~A . Pdlil: I iW
CI'T'Y Oh MIN'I'ON
M Ii M 0 R A N U U M
UATH OF MEETING: May 10, 1983
CITY COUNCIL. AGHiNf3A FILM ; tDT71" AS I'lliM TU
PLACIiU ON AGENDA)
Consider altielid ing the TYol•king Capital Vehicle Maintenance
Budget.
SUMMARY:
In the 1982-83 Working Capital Budget for the Machine Shop,
funds were budgeted for painting the old Service Center. When
the Machine Shop was moved in late 1982, a review of the
equipment and the needs of the department was completed, At
that time an extra lathe and (IriIL press were designated as
surplus equipment. Phis equipment was consequently sold at
auction and we received $5,302.00. rms money was counted as
revenue to the Working Capital Budget and deposited in the sale
of Fixed Assets account.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Scaff would propose to use the money from the sale of the
surplus equipment to help paint the building.
ACTION RHQUIRHU:
Council should adopt an ordinance making a change in the budget
and then approve the bid for painting the building.
AL'THNA'T'IVBS:
Council could refuse the ordinance,
STAFF RHCOMNIHNUA'T'IONS:
Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance making a change in
the budget and approval of the bid for painting the building.
E XII I B I'T'S :
1. Memo to G. Chris Hartung
TU v e 1. a
Assistant City Manager
d01L
No, M
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THIS 1982.83 DUDGHT OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS BY INCRHASING THH APPROPRIATIONS OF THE WORKINU CAPITAL
FUND IN THH AMOUNT OF $5,302,001 AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, Section 8,08 of the Charter of the City of Denton
authorizes the City Council to emend the original budget in
cases of grave public necessity where unusual and unforeseen
conditions necessitate emergency expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that
appropriations are needed to meet such emergency oxponditures
which could not, by diligent thought and attention, have been
Included in the original budget; now, therefore
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS;
SECTION I,
The 1982.83 budget of the City of Denton, Texas is hereTy
amended by increasing the appropriations of the Working Capital
Fund in the amount of $5,302,00.
SECTION 11.
The City Manager is directed to attach it copy of tis
ordinance to the 1982.83 Budget as originally adopted and file a
copy of this ordinance with the City Secretary who shall cause
the same to be published once in the next issue of the Uent, n
Record -Chronic le available for such publication,
SECTION 111,
That this ordinance shall become effective from and after
its passage and approval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1933,
'M
RICHARD 0. STEWARr, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, 'T'EXAS
EY: ~~rt
ciry of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817 `):,6.8200
- -
M H M O R A N 1) U M
1110; G. Chris Hartung
FROM; Rick Svohla
1) ATI- ; I{ay 4, 1083
SIJBJiiCT: Budget Amendment to the Working Capital Budget
In the 1982-83 Working Capital Budget for the Machine Shop,
funds were budgeted for painting the old Service Center, Whe
the Machine Shop ryas moved in late 1982, a revieaq of the
equipment and the needs 01' the department was completed. A
that time an extra lathe and drill press were designated as
surplus ec(u.i)ment, This equipment was consequently sold a`
auction and isle received $5,502.00. This money was counted a:
revenue to the Working Capital Budget and deposited in the sal:
of Fixed Assets account,
Bids have been taken for painting t.ho building in the amount o:
$7,790.00. 't'his bid would be for two coats of paint to t:
applied to the old Service Center. Since the Machine Shop ha;
moved to the old Service Center, the it seems to ical to tn:
staff that this money bo used tO refurbish its new location.
If you or the Council have any further questions, I will try r.:
answer t before or at the meeting.
is Sve t a r
Assistant City Manager
D,=PARTMF?4T OF PUBLK WORKS
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE; May 10, 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N;
SUBJECT; Bid N 9133 Painting Building at Service
Center
SUMMARY; This bid is for the labor and material to
paint the Vehicle Maintenance Building,
Solid Waste Container Maintenance Building
and the Traffic Control Building, All of
these buildings are metal structures. The
Vehicles Maintenance building needs painting
to prevent further deterioration and weather
damage. The container maintenance buildinq
has never been painted and the Traffic
Control building is the converted animal
shelter complex and needs numerous
improvements.
ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by council and award of bid.
SOURCE OF FUNDS; Funds for the Vehicle Maintenance painting
will come from a special projects account
setup for improvements to the Garage and
Machine Shop facilities, The other two
projects will be funded from 1982-83 budget
accounts for building maintenance,
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the
lowest bidder of Gray and Baty in the amount
of .$7,790.00 for item N1, Item N2, $1$60.00
and item #3, $1,050.00. Total bid price
$10,200.00,
EXHIBITS: Tabulation sheet,
~•I
SUBMITTED BY: i~ omT D, Shaw, C.N,M,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
TDS/ 1 c
0096b
11IU fl _9133
aID '1111'G1: Painting of 8 11 ding
OPENED 3/29/83 _ Bounds Gray &
Paint Co, Baty Const,
AL'COUN'I' 11
Y_._^ 1 ' h f3'S IP"IO VI,NIJOII VGNUO VENDOR - RNUOR VCNUUE2_ _ VENDOR ~ VENDOR---
Vehicle Maintenance Bldg, 13,243.00 71-~~---
790.00
2. Solid Waste Bldg, 2,207,00 1060.00
3. Traffic Control Bldg. 2,811.00 29050.00` - - + -
Total Bid 18,267.00 10,200.00
i
North Central Tend Council of 8avernments
N P O Orawer COQ Arlinglon, Texas 76006-6068
FROM: Florence Shapiro, NCTCOG President DATE: April 22, 1983a
TO: NCTCOG Member Governments
SUBJECT: Election of Officers and Directors for NCTCOG's 1983-84 Executive Board
Officers and Directors for NCTCOG's 1983-84 Executive Board will be elected at the
June 24 General Assembly meeting.
I will serve as Chalrman of the Nominating Committee, composed of the following
Richard C. Newkirk, Councilman of Fort Worth - Past President 1981-82
Nathan White, former County Judge of Collin County - Past President 1980-81
Charles Clack, former Mayor of Garland - Past President 1979-80
S. J. Stovall, former Mayor of Arlington - Past President 1977-78
Jerry Gilmore, former Councilman of Dallas - Past President 1974-75
Dan Petty, President Henry S. Miller Company, Dallas
This Committee will hold several "work sessions" prior to developing nominations for
consideration by the General Assembly on June 24, In this connection, members of the
Nominating Committee have expressed Interest In receiving recommendations from
member governments. For your consideration, attached is a sheet reflecting the
structure of the Executive Board and on the opposite side of the page a listing of
current Board members, Keep In mind that all positions are not open to nomination
and that some current members of the Executive Board may very likely be held over
for another term.
Enclosed Is a form for your convenience in submitting recommendations to the
Nominating Committee. Any local official may submit recommendations - however,
oniY vating representatives of NCTCOG city and county member governments are
ells-16Ie to serve on t e xecut ve o- a.
For your convenience, on the back side of this page are listed mailing addresses and
telephone numbers of members of the 1983-84 Nominating Committee should you wish to
contact them directly.
We would appreciate receiving your recommendations by Friday, May 13, 1983.
Florence S aplro
cf
Attachments
Genterpoint "two 616 Six Flags Drive Dallas/Fort Worth Molro 817/461-3300
1N3-84 NOI11NATING COMMITTEE
Florence Shapiro
Mayor Pro Tem of Plano
1906 Sparrows Point Court
Plano, Texas 75023
(214) 424-6631 City Hall (metro)
(214) 596-9453 Home (metro)
Dick Newkirk
4208 lone Oak Drive
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
(817) 737-6905 - Home
Nathan White
P. 0. Box 211
Piano, Texas 75074
(214) 424-7541 Office
Charles Clack
2820 Country Club Drive
Garland, Texas 75043
(214) 278-3667
S. J. Stovall
4816 Racquet Club Drive
Arlington, Texas 76015
(817) 465-0586 Home
Jerry Gilmore
1800 N. Market
Dallas, Texas 75202
(214) 742-3873 Office
Dan Petty
President
Henry S. Miller Company, Realtors-Dallas
2001 Bryan Tower
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 748-•9171 Office
1983-84 NOMINATING COMMI3'TEE
Florence Shapiro
Mayor Pro Tom of Plano
1906 Sparrows Point Court
Plano, Texas 75023
(214) 424-6531 City Hall (metro)
(214) 596-9453 Home (metro)
Dick Newkirk
4208 Lone Oak Drive
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
(817) 737-6905 - Home
Nathan White
P. 0, Box 24
Plano, Texas 75074
(214) 424-7541 Office
Charles Clack
2820 Country Club Drive
Garland, Texas 75043
(214) 278-3667
S. J. Stovall
4816 Racquet Club Drive
Arlington, Texas 76015
(817) 465-0586 Horne
Jerry Gilmore
1800 N. Market
Dallas, Texas 75202
(214) 742-3673 Office
Dan Petty
President
Henry S. Miller Company, Realtors-Dallas
2001 Bryan Tower
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 748-9171 Office
NORTH CENTRAL. TEXAS COUNCIL. OF GOVERNMENTS
Executive Board Structure
(According to NCTCOG Revised Bylaws)
OFFICERS
President
-(Elected by General Assembly, Prior experience on Executive Board desirable.)
May be any City or County NCTCOG voting representative from the region.
Vice-President
ecte Iiy General Assembly, Prior experience on Executive Board desirable,)
May be any City or County NCTCOG voting representative from the region.
Secretary-Treasurer
(Elected by General Assembly.)
May be any City or County NCTCOG voting representative from the region.
Past President
-Automat c position on Executive Board for Past President, )
DIRECTORS
Dallas Director
e ecte by City of Dallas City Council, )
Fort Worth Director
e ected by City of Fort Worth City Council.)
*Urban Count Director
is Director must be a voting representative from either Dallas or Tarrant County
governments, )
*Non-Metro County Director
(This Director must be a voting representative from one of the non-metro
member county governments.)
Non-Metro City Director
(Must be voting representative from a member city government not in Dallas or
Tarrant County,)
CITIZEN DIRECTORS
*Urban Citizen Director
(Selected by C OG Executive Board. Must be a non-elected citizen
representative from either Dallas or Tarrant County,)
*Non-Metro Citizen Director
(Selected by NCTCOG Executive Board. Must be a non-elected citizen
representative from one of the non-metro member counties.)
*A citizen representative and a County Director may not represent the same County.
(The practice has been to rotate the Urban County Director position from Dallas to
Tarrant to Dallas, etc. every two years with the Urban Citizen Director representing
the other County.)
If the Dallas or Fort Worth Director serves In an officer position, the Director slot
then becomes open,
NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL. OF GOVERNMENTS
19922-93 ExeCUUVO Board
OFFICERS
President - Florence Shapiro, Mayor Pro Tem of Plano
Vice President - Wes Wise, Councilman of Dallas
Secretary-Treasurer - Len Gibbens, Mayor of Mesquite
Past President - Richard C, Newkirk, Mayor Pro Tom of Fort Worth
DIRECTORS
Director - Foster Parsell, Councilman of Hurst
Director - Cary W, Bruner, Councilman of Arlington
4
Urban County Director A, Lyn Gregory, Tarrant County Commissioner
Non-Metro County Director - Joe Grubbs, County Judge of Ellis County
Non-Metro City Director - Jim Riddlesperger, Councilman of Denton
CITIZEN REPRESENTATIVES
Urban Citizen Director - Gerald Heningsman, Dallas County
Non-Metro Citlzen Director Jamie Vick, Parker County
t
NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVSRNMHNTS
ice- R3 Executive Board
OFFICERS
President - Florence Shapiro, Mayor Pro Tem of Plano
Vice President - Was Wise, Councilman of Dallas
Secretary-Treasurer_ - Len Gibbens, Mayor of Mesquite
Past President - Richard C, Newkirk, Mayor Pro Tem of Fort Worth
13 1 RECTORS
Director - Foster Parsell, Councilman of Hurst
Director - Gary W. Bruner, Councilman of Arlington
Urban County Director - A. Lyn Grerjory, Tarrant County Commissioner
Non-Metro County Director - Joe Grubbs, County Judge of Ellis County
Non-Metro City Director - Jim Rlddlesperger, Councilman of Denton
CITIZEN REPRIESENTATIVE.So
Urban Citizen Director - Gerald Heriingsman, Dallas County
Non-Metro Citizen Director - Jamie Vick, Parker County
FROM: _ DATE:
Title
oca overnment Represented
TO: Florence Shapiro, NCTCOG President - Chairman, Nominating Committee
SUBJECT: Recommendation for NCTCOG's 1983-84 Executive Board
I would like to recommend the following NCTCOG voting representative:
Name
Title ayorunc lmem er, -City Commissioner, County
Judge, County Commissioner)
Local Government Represented
for consideration by the Nominating Committee as they prepare nominations for
NCTCOG's 1983-84 Executive Board.
Additional supporting comments:
Signed:
(Attach a resume or additional biographical Information, If desired.)
Please return this form to the NCTCOG offices, on or before Friday, May 13.
I
I
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
May 10, 1983
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, Mal
10, at 5:30 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal
Building at which the following items will be considered:
11 Discussion of the 1983 Citizen's Survey instrument.
2. Receive a report and consider Change Orders for the
Police Building renovation project.
3. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Apppointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V. A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
May 10, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipa,1
Building at which the following items will be considered:
7:00 P.m.
1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
April 19, 1983.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee tc~
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid # 9109 - Pecan Creek Dam
2. Bid # 9138 - Ranch Estates sanitary sewer
lines
City Council Agenda
May 10, 1983
Page Two
3. Bid # 9143 - sprockets and chains
4. Bid # 9146 - Repair raw water pump
5. Purchase Order # 57644 to
Conley-Lott-Nichols in excess of $3,000.00
B. Plats3
1. Approval of the final p lat of The Village -
Phase IV. (The Planning and Zoning
commission recommends approval.)
2. Approval of the final plat of the Stone Hill
Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
3. Consider the request of the Kiwanis Club for
permission to hold a fireworks display at Fouts Field
on July 4, 1983.
4. Consider the request of the Accelerated Christian
Education conference for permission to hold a
. fireworks display at Fouts Field on may 23, 1983.
5. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1566. This is the petition of Homa Badie
requesting a change in zoning from multi-family
(bir-1) to the planned development (PD)
classification for office use at 215 Bonnie Brae
Street. The property is more particvularl,;
described as lot 1, Bonnie Brae Addition, and is
located along the west side of Bonnie Brae Street
beginning approximately 200 feet north of the
intersection of Bonnie Brae and West Oak. (The
Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from multi-family (MP-1) to the
planned development (PD) classification
for office use at 215 Bonnie Brae
Street.
B. Z-1575. This is the -~tition of Tom Stingley
requesting a change in zoning from two-family
(2-F) to the planned development (PD
classification on an 11,520 square foot lot whic-.
. begins at the northwest corner of Bolivar an<i
Crescent. If approveu, the planned development
(PD) would permit the division of the property
City Council Agenda
May 10, 1983
Page Three
into two (2) lots totaling 100'x60' and 60'x92',
respectively. A single family residential land
use is proposed for the 1001x60' lot that would
front on Crescent and an existing single family
residence would remain on the 601x92' lot at the
corner of Bolivar and Crescent. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
11 Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning
fram two-family (2-F) to the planned
development (PD) classification on an 11,520
square foot lot which begins at the
northwest corner of Bolivar and Crescent.
61 Consider the petition of K, J. and Ann Minton
requesting a change in zoning from single family
(SF-7) to the office (0) classification on a 0,486
acre tract located at 1600 and 1608 Bernard Street and
702 Stemmons.
7. Ordinances:
i A. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time, and place for public hearings concerning
the proposed annexation of approximately 491.13
acres of land located along the south side of Jim,
Christal Road and west of the existing city limit
line and authorizing the Mayor to publish a.
notice thereof. (7,-1578)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance pertaining to,
water rates and charges.
81 Consider removing Zoning Case No. Z-1565 from the
table.
9. Consider zoning change request in Zoning Case No.
Z-1565.
A~ Consider adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from a specific use permit (5.151) for a
day care center to the two family (2-F}
classification on property located along the west
side of Stuart Road beginning approximately 1100
feet north of the intersection of Stuart Road an.:
Windsor Drive and being more particularly
described as lot 4, The Village - Phase
(7.-1565)
City Council Agenda
May 14, 1983
Page Four
10. Consider removing zoning Case No, Z-1569 from the table
11. Consider zoning change request in Zoning Case No.
Z-15690
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance changing the
zoning from single family (SF-7) to the two
family (2-F) classification on property located
on the east side of Carroll boulevard north of -
Fain Street and being more particularly described
as lots 6 and 7, block A, in the Richard A.
Harris Subdivision. (Z-1569)
12. Resolutions:
A. Consider adoption of a resolution in support of
religious freedom for all denominations.
B. Consider adoption of a resolution authorizing an
agreement between the City of Denton and the
'texas Municipal Power Agency regarding ownership
of electric facilities and improvements placed on
• City property by TMPA.
C, Consider adoption of a Resolution to create
Argyle Municipal Utility District (MUD),
13. Consider Electric Rate Review Advisory Committee
recommendation on electric rate study. (The Public
Utility Board recommends approval.)
14. Consider Change Order #3 of Contract C-48-1,188-13
Hickory Creek Lift Station for Red River Construction
Company, (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
15. Consider Change Order #13, C-48-1188-03, Wastewater
Treatment Plant, from Gracon Construction Company and
Freese and Nichols, Inc. (The Public Utility Board
recommends approval.)
16. Consider funding and purchase of the System Contro.
And Data Acquisition (SCADA) for the raw water pump
station and water plant. (The Public Utility Boar,:
recommends approval.)
17. Consider contract with Ed Blaylock for a utility vide-:
slide program. (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
City Council Agenda
May 10, 1983'
Page Five
18. Consider participation in oversize (above 10"
diameter) of sanitary sewer line from state Highway
Bast 380 to Cooper Creek Lift Station serv,tng Sandy
Hills Mobile Home Subdivision and Capricorn Mobile
Home Park. (The Public Utility Board recommends
approval.)
19. Consider increase coverage for boiler and machine
insurance.
20. Consider purchasing easements from 'T'exas Municipal
Power Agency (TMPA),
21. Consider approval of contracts for teaching Defensive
Driving course.
22, Consider amending the working capital vehicle
maintenance budget.
23. Consider nominations for officers and directors to the
North Central Texas Council of Government's 1983-83
Executive board.
O 24. Official Action on Executive Session items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
25. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
07970
kjWM-C-W-0-F-AUTR-Mr1 C1
THIS 15 TO WTIF'Y Thal the mlcropholographs appearing an this Pllm*Fllo
i~aiitny M,IIh_ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET 05/10/83 and
>rndinq with CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET are
accurate and complete reproducilons of the records of (Company and Dept,) CITY OF DDENTON
CITY SECRETARY .as detlvervd In the regular course of
buslnsss for photographing,
H Is further certlflmd that the micrgphotagraphle processes were aeeompllsh.d In
v monner and on Alms which m"Is with niulremenls of th* Notlonol aurwu of Standards
fwr poe manent mlcrophotograp ►Ic copy,
~1licra • FIOGQrds COMffy
llMeel TCCHHOLOOY AT (tA 9PK come" ope"W
PLACE61n yrQlt~pmk RavJ State
Artlnalon, Texas 76010