HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-18-1983_10-04-1983
ciryof DENTAN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 8MOING / 08NrON, TEXAS 76201 ~ rELCPHONE (817) 566,8200
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: 0, Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATE: October 16, 1983
SUBJECT: Bids on Commercial Sanitation Systems
As you know, we have also received bids on the sale of the
commercial collection system which we have been in the process
of evaluating. As in the report on the residential bids, we
have presented this analysis in two parts. The first section
attempts to identify the best bidder and the second section
attempts to determine whether or not we should sell the system.
1 YS S OF BIDS
in the area of commercial collection, we received three bids
which varied in relation to rates, the purchase price for our
equipment and the percentage of revenue paid to the City for
billing and collection. The bidders on the system were Texas
Waste Management (TWNI), MSM Sanitation (MSM), and Area
Industrial Disposal Service (AIDS), A summary of the bids
received and the existing City rates are as followsi
city of
TWM MSM AIDS _ Denton
Equipment
Purchase Price $314,900 $172,405 $271,500 N/A
Percentage Paid
city for Billing 5% 2% N/A
Service Per Week
2 Yd, container
1 $15,00 $12.00 $ 24.50 $11.76
2 28.00 18,00 43,35 18.29
3 40.00 25,00 66.30 24.82
4 53.00 31.00 87.97 31,36
5 66,00 38.00 110.92 37.89
6 78,00 45,00 132,60 44.43
3 Yd. Container
1 $ 20.00 $15.00 $ 29.25 $15.03
2 36.00 25.00 58.50 24.82
3 53.00 33.00 86.62 33,32
4 70.00 42.00 117,00 41,81
5 87.00 51.00 145.13 50.63
6 104.00 60.00 175.50 59.46
4 Yd. Container
1 28.00 $18.00 $ 38.25 $17.96
2 54.00 31,00 77,63 31.02
3 79.00 44.00 117.00 43.78
4 105.00 57,00 115.25 56,85
5 130.00 70.00 194.63 69.91
6 155.00 83.00 234,00 82.65
~ y
ANALYSIS OF SIDS
October 16, 1983
Page 2
ROLLOFF RATE,S,
TM
SLZ~F RENTAL PER PULL 1 SJ 2X/WK X S 4X/WK
20 YD. O.T, $ 47,52 $120,30 $564.81 $1,082.10 $1,599,39 $2,116,68
40 YD. O.T. 52,92 150.00 697.92 1,342.92 1,987,92 2,632.92
12 YD. PACKER 82,08 109.50 552.93 1,023.78 1,494.63 1,965.48
15 YD, PACKER 89.10 113.55 577,37 1,065.64 11553.91 2,042.18
20 YD, PACKER 91,47 120.30 608,76 1,126.05 1,643,34 2,160.63
25 YD. PACKER 98,60 127,05 644.92 1,191.24 1,737,56 2,283,88
42 YD, PACKER
2.3 225.00 150.00 870.00 1,515.00 2,160,00 2,805.00
42 YD, PACKER
4.0 250.00 150.00 895.00 1,540.00 2,185.00 2,830,00
42 YD. PACKER
2.3 W/CHUTE 245,00 150.00 890.00 1,535.00 21188.00 2,823.00
SEC. DOOR
ms m
SIZE RE Al-I PER PULL 1' W 2X/WK 3X/WK 4X/WK
20 YD. O.T. $ 47.52 $ 50,00 $240.00 $ 400.00 $ 550.00 $ 700.00
40 YD. O.T, 52.92 65.00 317.00 575.00 832,00 11082.00
12 YD. PACKER 82.08 30.00 191.00 293.00 396.00 498.00
15 YD, PACKER 89,10 35.00 206,00 316.00 426.00 536.00
20 YD, PACKER 91.47 50,00 242.00 399,00 526.00 668.00
25 YD. PACKER 98,60 65.00 276.00 445.00 613.00 782.00
42 YD. PACKER
2,3 140.40 75.00 422.00 690,00 958.v0 1,230.00
42 YD. PACKER
4.0 174.96 75.00 459.00 724.00 996.00 1,265.00
42 YD. PACKER
2,3 W/CHUTE 144.72 75.00 426,00 695.00 963.00 1,238.00
SEC. DOOR
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
October 16, 1983
Page 3
AIDS
SIZE RENTAL PER PULL 1'c W ~ 3X/WK 4.,{/WK
20 YD. O.T. $ 85.00 $135.00
40 YD. O.T. 105.00 145.00
12 YD. PACKER 150,00 152.00 NOT BID
15 YD. PACKER 175,00 158.00
20 YD. PACKER 200.OU 165.00
25 YD. PACKER 225.00 173.00
42 YD. PACKER 318.00 192.00
42 YD. PACKER 550,00 192.00
42 YD. PACKER 375.00 192.00
W/CHUTE Sr
SEC. DR.
1
CITY OF DENTON
SIZE RENTALS PER PULL 1X WK 2Z/WK 3X/WK 4 4Yi
20 YD. O.T. $ 47.52 $ 35.64 $200.77 $ 354.02 $ 507.27 $ 660.52
40 YD. O.T. 52.92 54.64 287.90 523,34 757.87 982.86
12 YD. PACKER 82.08 2i.60 174,96 267.84 360.72 453.60
15 YD. PACKER 89.10 23.22 188.94 288.79 388,63 488.48
20 YD. PACKER 91.47 30,05 220.70 349.95 479.19 608,43
25 YD. PACKER 98.60 35.64 251.85 405.10 588.36 711.61
42 YD. PACKER 140.40 56.70 384.21 628.02 871.83 1,115.64
42 YD. PACKER 174.96 56.70 418.77 662.58 906.39 1,150.20
42 YD. PACKER 144.72 56.70 388.53 632.34 876.15 1,119.96
W/CHUTE &
SEC. DR.
From the information received in the bids, MSM was definitely the
low bidder in terms of rates with TWM being second lowest and
AIDS was significantly higher than both of the other companies.
TWM bid the highest price for the purchase of equipment, with
AIDS offering the second highest price and MSM offering a signif-
icantly lower price for the equipment, eased upon the high
rates to be charged by AIDS and their moderate bid on the purchase
of our equipment, we have eliminated them from serious contention
on this bid.
MSM has offered the best rate for the customer and is sub-
stantially lower than the TWM on all rates. 'The offer for
equipment of $172,405 is considerably lower than our estimated
value of the equipment. In the area of commercial sanitation,
the City currently has an incurred debt of $13,000 for accrued
1 '
r
,
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
Octobor 16, 1983
Page 4
vacation time, $45,600 for equipment leases for a total of
$58,600. In addition, the commercial collection share of the
landfill closure cost is estimated at $115,650 for a total
liability of. $174,250. The equipment purchase price offered by
MSM would result in a net loss of $1,845.
At the present time MSM has not given a price for the City
providing for the billing and collection of revenues although
they have expressed a desire for the City to provide this service.
In regard to reference checks, MSM has been operating in the
City of Denton for over five years and seems to provide adequate
service. There were no other references offered by the bidder
for reference check, in addition, the bidder has failed to
provide information required in the bid specifications relative
to the competency of the company (Section 11 of the bid
specifications).
In regard to the impact on our employees, MSM has agreed to main-
tain the employment of all of our employees at their current
rate of pay for at least six months. This bidder has stated
that his company will probably eliminate one or two of the
positions after the six month period expires, In relation to
employee benefit package offered by MSM, no formal information
has been provided by this company. We do know that MSM provides
some type of medical and life insurance for the employee at group
eatest however, btSM does not cover the cost of the life insurance
for their employees, In addition, MSM appears to offer some
type of profit sharing plan. We havo no information pertaining
to MSM benefits concerning paid vacation, sick, and holiday leave.
TWM has proposed a rate which is considerably higher than
our existing rate and higher than the rate bid by MSM. TWM has
offered the City $314,900 for the purchase of our equipment
which would cover the current system's debt and result in a
balance of $140,650 in revenue to the City, in addition, TWM
has offered to pay the City a 5% fee on gross revenues for the
provision of billing and collection service. This fee would
result in an additional $44,407 annual revenues to the City
and $222,033 over the five year life of the contract. The cost
of providing this service is estimated at $155,423 over the life
of the contract, resulting in a profit of $66,610 over the next
five years.
The reference check on TWM operations revealed that they were
highly regarded in the communities they serve. There seemed to
be very few problems in the communities which TWM served and
these appeared to be quite minor in nature. TWM also appears to
have an excellent track record regarding community involvement
and responds well to request for special service.
1
ANr1L03FS OF BIDS
October 16, 19$3
Rage 5
Relative to employee benefits, TWM appears to offer a benefit
package similar to the one the City of Denton offers, TWM
does not offer paid sick leave and offers less paid vacation
than the city of Denton. TWM does offer dental care insurance
and a profit sharing plan as opposed to the City's benefit
package which does not offor either of these benefits, TIN
has also agreed to maintain the employment of our existing
employees at their current rate of pay for a six month period.
TWM has also indicated that they would like all of these
persons to stay with their organization on a long term basis,
While MSM offers the best rates, TWM appears to be superior
in all other aspects of the bid. It also appears that TWM
is more capable of providing dependable, quality service to the
customer, The rates proposed by MSM are extremely low and
according to the bid specifications can only be increased a
maximum of 6% per year for the five year term of the contract.
We are extremely concerned about MSM's financial. ability to
provide the service over the length of the contract especially
in light of the trends In the rate of inflation, In essence,
we are afraid that NISM might go under due to their low rates
during the term of the contract. Thus, the city of Denton would
be forced to rebid the system or get back in the business of
commercial collections.
Xn our opinion, TWM appears to offer the best deal for the City
although their rates are significantly higher than those offered
by MSM. One essential point which must be taken into consideration
is the fact that MSM is already operating a system in Denton.
Should our existing customers dislike the rates or services
provided by TWM, they still have the option of discontinuing
the service and contracting with MSM for commercial collection
service,
Based upon this analysis, we considered TWM to be the best
bidder. Should the decision be made to sell the commercial
system, we recommend that the bid be awarded to TWM.
ANALYSIS OF JHE SALE
1
In determining whether or not to sell the system, there are
several factors which must be considered. These factors
includes
1, The effect on service to the customer,
2. The financial impact on the customer,
3. The financial impact on the City.
4. The impact on existing employees.
These factors are critical to the decision of whether or not
to sell the system and must be evaluated in comparison to our
existing system.
IMPACT ON SERVICE
Based upon the reference check conducted on the service provided
by TSJM, it appears that this firm would be capable of providing
dependable, quality commercial collection service. Additionally,
the financial condition of this firm is such that we have no
concerns regarding its continued operation and service
disruption due to lack of financing. In spite of these factors
there is still some question as to how the service would compare
to the service which is currently provided.
FINANCIAL IMPACT ON THE CUSTOMER
The rates proposed by TWM are substantially higher than our
existing rate structure and would have a significant impact
on the customer. Our current customers could expect to pay as
much as 423 more for the same level of service currently
provided by the City. It is necessary to point out that the
rates proposed by TWM are the maximum rates they can charge.
These rates would be somewhat flexible in that TWM could
reduce the rates below the maximum if they so desire.
FINANCIAL IMPACT ON THE CITY
If the system was sold, the City would obviously lose some
revenues. The impact on the general fund resulting from the
elimination of the administrative transfer would be approximately
$23,700 per year or $118,500 over the life of the contract.
Likewise, there would be a reduction of $75,003 per year or
$375,015 over the life of the contract for the commercial
collections share of the landfill operating budget. A portion
of this loss would be offset due to the anticipated profit of
ALNIALYSiS OF THE SALE
October 16, 1983
Page 2
$66,610 resulting from the 5% of gross revenue fee proposed by
TWM For billing and collection service over the life of this
contract, Thus, the sale of the system could result in a net
loss of $286,255 over the life of the contract.
Currently, our system is operating at a deficit when all costs
are considered) therefore, there is no loss of net income
resulting from the sale at this time, The financial condition
of our system is considered a short term problem and is due
primarily to some significant capital expenditures planned this
fiscal year. We anticipate that the system will generate some
amount of net income in the future) however, we have not
included these figures in this analysis,
The loss of revenue for the commercial share of landfill
operations is of primary concern. The decrease in commercial
trash received at the landfill would nt)t really allow for any
significant reduction in landfill operating costs as we would
still need the same number of persons and equipment as
currently, exists in order to handle the trash generated by
the residential system, Thus, the city would need to find
another $75,003 annually to cover the cost of landfill operations'.
This additional cost could be covered through the increase of
residential rates or through some financial arrangement with
the commercial contractor for the use of the landfill. The
latter option is questionable, while the first option is highly
undesirable.
IMPACT ON EXISTING EMPLOYEES
As stated previously, TWM has a benefit package which is similar
to the City of Denton's benefit package with a few exceptions,
TWM offers dental care insurance and a profit sharing plan
while the city does not offer either of these benefits. On the
other hand, TWM does not offer any paid sick leave and less
paid leave than the City of Denton. Thus, the better benefit
package is a matter of personal preference.
SUMMARY/RECOMMENDATION
Based upon this analysis, it is apparent that the sale of the
commercial collection system would be at best a break even situation
from a financial standpoint. The impact on the customer from
a service and cost standpoint is questionable and could
ANALYSIS OF THE SALE
October 14, 1983
Page 3
possibly be detrimental. In addition, we also question the
impact that the sale would have on our current employees. There-
fore, we would recommend that the City of Denton not sell the
commercial collection system and that the City Council reject
all bids,
R ct y submit ed,
G. Chris Hartung
Gi~uj C,ou,hci ~
f Uganda
~ackG+
O~~b~r (I,1983
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
October 11, 1983
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, October 11, 1983, at 5;00 p.m. in the New Police
Building at which the following items will be considered;
5:00 p.m.
11 Tour of the new Police Building.
2. Consider adoption of an ordinance instituting
annexation proceedings on tract of land consisting or
approximately 150 acres beginning at the intersection
of Mayhill Road and East McKinney Street. (Z^1590)
3. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.St
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(8), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on ,the of 1983 at /.J
o'clock (a.m.)(p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1049C
PUS'I'tiU;__ lO/G/83
AGHNDA:
N11Mli;~ CITY Ulr UIiN'1'UN ci'1'Y CUUNCII,
DAY: 'I'UOSdny October 11, 1983 _
1'li~lflt S;Oo
PLACe' Nols_Police 13ui1d11t~
61hM0hR5 NOTA'1'IUNS YHS NO
Richard Stewart 382-3225
Joe Alford 387-1373
Jack ua+ ton 566-24110
Mark Chew 383-1083
Charles llouklns 566-3031
James Riddlesnt~rgor 382-8757
Ray Stephens -3310 _
5eec-33 y4
M11AL Sf;RV1Cli YES NUJ
NOTIFY .NR1:SS YES NO
Denton Record Chronicle N20
K llN'1' N 3 ~J'J
Channel 25 #75
TIVIY'U Lass-0 kq-r
NT Daily 565 2353 7 C~
KN'1'U 565-3688 c -
il~iitnn C0u11ty 1%nt rFr1 . ~y _
_.5 6 6H5q-i-
0166C
F
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL.
October 11, 1983
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, October 11, 1983, at 5;00 p.m. in the New Police
Building at which the following items will be considered;
5;00 p,m.
1. Tour of the new Police Building,
2, Consider adoption of an ordinance instituting
annexation proceedings on tract of land consisting of
approximately 150 acres beginning at the intersection
of Mayhill Road and East McKinney Street, (Z-1590)
3. Executive Session;
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252-17
V.A,T.S t
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T,S.
0. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1983 at
o'clock (a.m.) (p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
10490
AGENDA
CITY OV DENTON CITY COUNCIL
October 11, 1983
Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on
Tuesday, October 11, 1983) at 5:00 p,m, in the Now Police
Building at which the following items will be considered:
5:00 p ,ms
14 'four of the new Police Building,
2. Consider adoption of an ordinance instituting
annexation proceedings on tract of land consisting of
approximately 150 acres beginning at the intersection
of Mayhill Road and East McKinney Street. (z-1590)
36 Executive Session:
A. Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A,T.S,
Be Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Do Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1983 at
o'clock (a.m,) (p.m,)
CITY SECRETARY
10490
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM= Charlotte Allen, City Secretary
DATE: October 6, 1983
SUBJECT: back-Up Materials for Agenda Item 112
The referenced ordinance will be dalivered at the Council
meeting on Tuesday.
4 ~
ar ottd Allen
ca
1049C/2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
Meec:ing Date; October 11, 1983
Subject; Institute annexation proceedings on a tract
of land consisting of 150,5 acres which be-
gins at the intersection of Ma hill Road and
East McKinney Street, (Z-1590}
Summary; A mobile home park is proposed on approxi-
mately 104 acres of the land included in this
annexation,
Action Required; Move to approve institution of annexation
proceedings,
Alternatives; 1, Institute proceedings on the entire
150,5 acre tract of land;
2. Reduce the size of the area to be
annexed and institute proceedings;
3. Discontinue annexation proceedings,
Source of Funds; Department Budgets
Recommendation; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of annexation,
Exhibit; Map
ar es Watkins
Senior Planner
VIE
. e I
' •f 1 w1 '•l #YAFI .,~'f
OA J
( VIA, j J '{w MrNwU'.
♦yl rk•"ljt y
yJ
4 I>14111[.G' i` 1 \}nf 11 ~t * .{y } 1; ` f11;ti'l~l(Ir~
t 1 ' F y ♦ ♦ \ ;,1 r, 'k N n n111•••'l..t' ' ' ~:.1, t ^ SI,~,
, Yi2 r k SI,:, r ' r r y,yM~ t
t rte, *.r Lr i" { ,frytf~li' 1 I.., e• „
i rGr. ~4111`lya;w kl`~, t. Jr ,;~^y1~,CV >1 ~r5'~ a r. 1 'y' f
• •1 Y}1 '~lJ I!rl l4 n .n\ A ~l„ y`~r"~Y.,. ~•r:ll y))
.,r M4 , l+ ~ I , 1/S~1F'r°t r} A~, 1N ,!.'~n {1 ~a~3. ,t\l ~ , j ~ j~~ ' ' '
AI
+ `fIf
k 1:W ,Fj~T I"''ti QY l,y'I#5` ♦I ,y
• ` I rrr ' V 4. t ri4}},ROlt .w b ' , ,1 ,({.ytii.. d. I Ih P rii r1 dljy t„ r 4 E'i , `r r~♦ iY '1 ' n + J
1 if `~Tr , w~ r +•,r~f~•: iC,~ . ' M'~~i , ~a•~ ~tl\r S{ Y.w t%I,111~ ~ Ij• f~7,4 4• ~rTti~ Mw
~ r"A, r~,r'• AA!`T'li~h J~AV?,i ~ ,f ♦ ~ r t~! r yy ~ S'LT~~~Sh~ r~' f •
`pl' ♦I ~',n+•' ~ •(t1 : R ''6„~ ~,J u , It t, / •S" r• , } il~'~ii ~'M~N V p~` t 1~y
`r Y, r~ S i i ~~i^• 1 ~1 . 4"d jt ++``47 , . a~ .'1irJ~H~hS1~•~~y~~l{{{f~{# Kitlyt ,~'y P. !wl~hyy
1, f 1 . . w r ...r ~1l Ht •ltnt,"r}'!{r10' •K • r! il' ,~f .
'M' ti, , , 1' . it , ♦,j'
X 1j fi'4♦ ~51r.C
.r.11,+• r j.' 'r rl~jf ~(.7; I ~ ~I .Tw+~f ~~7., t .~}~`iti l ,~.~i ~L" 'ti
rl. .'AF 1h ~Ir'n `,.\A .4 1 1, f_ •S ~n ~,~1j~rjy~.'\. 1 ; 1 ~
~.5'w ; r . y~irtV7~'iP }j ' 'vf♦ tl'fk r ~ t~ Y
V
84
4k.~`~.'ti ' y'6 I '.~„S. ys,: ry 4y l' -I rTn ~•~kH!'~1:..
, • tti • 1 I .r-+YY~Y~y +...M. •M~~ l,'}flx+.i•. „~7.~ 'i 'r.l I~.`r.
'ryp j.,~ t1r1~ , 'r ' r~ ~ ~ • . 1" I -ll' l,.
~rM~G: I r7S' I ~ ♦ i ~ ♦
± V1 4,14. r ~S ~1iX'>~~, " . C_ ♦++~i r I IM, ..t1 r
Y . 1 ! r ~1 j r y~YY1. , .i T1 ,`1 ' ~ f'1 \ } ~ 1 +w.+ V ~ `fr I' L.i 1 .l'
.4'L~.'JS ('t,, ` p~jl l ~ ~ ~ +;'~t 7'rJ'i~t I h~ 1 • f Iif A ^ri:~ d y~ I~~l~'i ,
.y~~r, S .r { l 4~ •+1'~ .lad • J r •V1fr r ~ , t{ 1 1'M '.M~,', . t1A`- ,l~ 7.u~~,~.
- lR~ .M' r , A r ~1:;p r> t V / 'iY. 4. • I~ w w.'1•
♦.Iri ttl1 ~ii rr`a '111'. alp +Ja I_I ,
ZC W ♦S'.-1 A ll ~•K r 1 f. f~pl 1 X14 ' .Vi+.
.rf Il a. `r y t., S / 1 k 1 ~ ~f,~}1`+L ,~.ir •
ICI-
ILI
r~21 r# ~(1' l~; ' 't~ rr +Y .~I ",4:~r~ 1, r } ♦ ♦ ; rM1 , ~t
yRC r 11 ~y, may, r,
. r ~~~,~AA'~,~ ~++~1..) ',A ♦nty~. +b
4 It
1 •I1rf w r l'~'11 1' , 1t, X11i 1 tl,f~`, r d~~~+ 4
Ltl 1 V • 4~t.,. "~.~~1 r. r ~ri~.ia ~~k V'..G ~ (Y, Sy,,~ _
?V r. r• rS, 1 yL,°~r~t. ';Ml ~Ilyy
, J ~ 'e: r~ M li ~ L y~~y~~~f}~~• rlb~{ t 1 " 14:h+Y.
w N 4 r•,. II ~ !
tot
:fr 'st* ,`Yl r. i,l~-IF~y}Y~_'' I (~ti^ \ {'/L~ I ' • 4 ,
~'Ir♦ i~t1 ~;,5'r,y 1'i It
il
tF Y ,
~g~,viota
~ackof
943
Oc+oo ey 4~ 1
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 4, 1983
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 4, 1983, at 5:30 p,m, in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
consideredi
11 Discussion of City of Denton user fee survey,
2, Discussion of annexation of a proposed 15 acre mobile
home subdivision located along the west side of
Swisher Road,
J, Executive sessions
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V,A,m.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T,S.
C, Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the city of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
September 23, 1983, at 7fO0 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
consideredr
7x00 P.M.
1. Consider approval of a resolution in appreciation of
Bruno P. Diaz for 30 years of service with the City of
Denton Utility Department,
2. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Special Called
meeting of September 131 1983.
3. Consent Agendar
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orderss
1. Bid #9164 Phoenix Sidewalk Project
2. Bid #9188 P.C,B. Disposal
3. Bid #9189 Distribution Transformers
4. Bid #9193 Drainage improvement
5. Bid #9194 Wire and Cable
City of Denton City Council Agenda
' October 4, 1983
Page Two
fl, Contractsi
1, consider approval of an amendment to extend
contract with Group Graphics for the final
printing of the Economic Development
Factbook.
C, Plats and Replatsi
1. Consider approval of the final replat of
lots 9 and 10, block D, Forrestridge
Addition, Section II, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2, consider approval of the final replat of
lots 6 and 71 Phillips Addition (The
Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval.)
3. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
the Hannah Estates Addition. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Consider approval of the final plat of the
Hillhaven Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
5. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
the Ambika Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
6. Consider approval of the preliminary replat
of lots 31 41 50 b, and part of lot 2,
Mercer Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
commission recommends approval.)
7. Consider approval of the preliminary and
final plat of lot 1, block 1, DISD
Elementary School Addition. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Public Hearingsi
A, H-28. This is the petition of Mr. and Mrs. A. W.
Woolsey requesting historic landmark (H) zoning
designation at 619 Grove Street. The property is
more particularly described as lot 3, block 1,
Woodland Addition, (The Historic Landmark
Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
` October 4, 1983
Page Three
1, Adoption of an ordinance approving historic
landmark (H) zoning designation at 619 drove
Street.
B, Z-1605, This is the petition of Brian Burke
representing Snider Development Corporation
requesting a change in zoning from agricultural
(A) to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 34.37 acre parcel beginning
adjacent and north of the intersection of U. S.
Hwy. 77 and Windsor Drive. If approved, the
planned development (PD) would permit the
following land uses:
Single Family Detached - on 19.54 acres
(104 lots with a typical size of 651x1001)
Duplexes - on 3.71 acres
Townhouses - on 3.49 acres
Street right of4way - on 4.60 acres
Open Space - on 2.60 acres
Drainage Easement - on 0.43 acre
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change
in zoning from agricultural (A) to the
planned development (PD) classification on a
34.37 acre parcel beginning adjacent and
north of the intersection of U, S. Highway
77 and Windsor Drive.
5. Consider approval of the preliminary and final plats
of lot 4, block 137, Sauls Addition. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
6. Ordinancesi
A. Consider adoption of a franchise ordinance with
General Telephone (third reading).
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
minimum standards for fuel farms, fueling
operations, fueling trucks and fueling personnel
at the Denton Municipal Airport. (The Airport
Advisory Board recommends approval.)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting minimum
wages for City of Denton construction projects.
r ,
City ,)f Denton City Council Agenda
October 4, 1983
` Wage Poor
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 35,66 acres of land
located at the southwest corner of FM 2181 and
Hickory Creek Road, (z-1609)
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 1,125 acres of land
located on the east and west sides of Mayhill
Road north of I-35E,
F, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 367 acres of land
located between 1-35W and the Santa Fe Railroad.
a, consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 43,9 acres of land
located west of 1-35W,
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 1,014,4 acres of land
located west of I-35W and south of Highway 380,
7. Resolutionst
A. Consider adoption of a resolution in support of
the Greenbelt Corridor at Lake Ray Roberts,
B. Consider adoption of a resolution supporting the
adoption of a constitutional amendment
authorizing the expenditure of public funds for
the relocation of sanitary sewer laterals upon
private property.
C. Consider adoption of a resolution in protest of
the Korean civilian airliner incident.
8. Consider nominating Raymond Pitts to the Board of
Directors of Denton County Appraiaal District.
91 Consider approval of the 1983 City of Denton tax roll.
10. Consider approval of appointment of Deputy City
Secretaries.
11. Official action on executive session itemst
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 4, 1983
Page Five
12, New Business
This itom provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas,
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of
1983 at o'clock
CITY SECRETARY
1039C
EMERGENCY AGENDA AV[,.,NDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
October 4, 1983
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 4, 19830 at 7;00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
consideredr
7:00 P.M,
1, Consider approval of an ordinance and quitclaim for
the abandonment of an easement in the Phyllis Breen
estate.
2. Consider approval of a consultant service agreement
for major inspection of electrical generating unit 112.
3. Consider a report on the Municipal Court computer
system.
4. Consider approval of a resolution nominating Raymond
Pitts to the Board of Directors of Denton County
Appraisal District,
•
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day_.. of c~1'4. , 1983 at off,
o'clock (a.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
10440
~i
EMERGENCY AGENDA ADDENDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
October 4, 1983
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 4, 1983, at 7100 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 P.M.
11 Consider approval of an ordinance and quitclaim for
the abandonment of an easement in the Phyllis Breen
estate.
2. Consider approval of a consultant service agreement
for major inspection of electrical generating unit 112.
3. Consider a report on the Municipal Court computer
system.
4. Consider approval of a resolution nominating Raymond
Pitts to the Board of Directors of Denton County
Appraisal District.
CEI(TIF'ICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1983 at
o'clock (a.m.) (pans)
CITY SECRETARY
1044C
October 41 1983 1
CITY COUNCIL FIMERGENCY AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT;
Consider ~aitclaim and Ordinance For Abandonment of
Easement In The Phyllis Breen Estate,
SUMMARY
The Hickory Creek Sewer Interceptor project consisted of
constructing this line across the Ph),llis Breen Estate,
An easement was obtained from the Patrick F, Breen heirs
which consisted of a 20' wide all-purpose utility easement..
This easement is Vol, 4270 Page 183, need Records, Denton
County, Texas, also shown in Vol, 1111, Page 871, This
easement was drawn-and prepared through Freese and Nichols,
Engineering Incorporated, and drawn by Edwin A, Apell in
November, 1981,
The sewer line was actually constructed in error from the
authorized easement, This error has been subsequently,
corrected with a new easement which is attached,
FISCAL SUNWARY;
N/A.
SOURCE OF FUNDS;
N/A,
RECOMMENDATION
The Staff recommends abandonment of the incorrect easement
in relationship to the "as built" sewer line and recommend
adoption of the new easement with a relationship to the
"as huilt" sewer line as shown on the attached corrected
survey, The Utilities board will review this item at thiair
special.cailed meeting of October 4, 1983, and their
recommendation will be presented at the council meeting,
Respectfully,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Location Map
II Survey of Existing Easement
III Ordinance (to be distributed at meeting)
IV Quitclaim Deed
'1 . 1\ ,
~v
EXLT= a sarl>:arr , wE.s.u.r exc'l 683
MEN V TKESE PAESENTS
OF CE' '01 ; GEED RECCIRC$
EE @AErN 3:10.67
roily nE,
for and in consideration of the sum of one
00i14r (S1 ,O0) casn to vs in hand paid by the City of Oenton, Texas, a
wwnicipal corporation of the County of Denton. State of Texas, the receipt
of width is hereby acknowledged, Ind other good and valuable Consideration
Including trio benefits that will accrue to Uur property, do hereby GIVE,
GRANT and EXTEND to the Sai4 City of Oenthn, Texas, its successors 4ad
assigns, tna right to d0nstruct or reconstruct utilities and perpetually
maintain an Ail.Pvrpos~ Utility Easement in, upon and across land described
as follows:
Said Tract being in the Wm, NEIL. Survey, Abstraet 970
Denton County, Texas, and Recorded in volume 427 Page 183 in
the Deed Records of Oentom County, Texas
Said edsemen: crossing tnis Droperty, comoeising two parts, as herein
designated Gila described, including ,li a permanent easement 20 ',feet
in width, fnr construction, or reconstruction of utilities andaour:.
enances, and for perpdtually maintaining an AlI Purpose Utility Ease-
c,ent, and 11 an additional area adjacent to the permanent easement
.alb feet In-Aidth, to be u5$d for initial conltruetion.
PART I. PU2MANEliT EASEMENT ~;Ti rVtTEAt;uE OESCAISEO AS FOLLOwSi
z
9EOINNING at a point in the South line of the aforementioned tract of
land, said point being west a distance of 255,9 fat from the
Southeast corner of said tract;
TMENCE North 01 degrees 00 minutes west a distance of 1305,75 feet to a
point in the North fence line of said tract, said point being In the
South line of Airport Road and being 278.60 feet west of the
Northeast comer of said tract.
?4xT 2, C7 : AUCT;ON EASEMENT
n adaItirr trio 20 foot C'eruanent ?:sa',.en, as described as0A. IM I A I t I a I
~s T'' S ei S... en;
:+•t . Y . ^aV:a' a14a"dr' Irc S'L'• 5? ferit
a rave :ne 'I4nt and privilege to remove
ino JiSIQ Se 3r, ;ne Sito, trots, brusn, Copris, excess exacavated
'ataeial, a;,, It WOO On t I , :hot +Cvld !n;erfere with access to the
f on$:ruCtIon $t to ono that „ould interfere with Construction Of the said
facilities,
TO HAV; A'IR T^ H0,01 ,Ail singular, the privileges Aforesaid to it,
the Said Cl". of pau'con, Texts, its successors and assigns forever,
togetnor with the right and privilege, at any and all tim s to enter said
promises or any part thereof, for the purpIse of Constructing, reconstrUCting
:-:4 perpetuAlly maintaining said facilities together with necessary dppurte.
;~ancas inside said perpetual easements and for making Conotctions therawitht
01` upon the con Ition that the City of Denton, Texas, will at all times,
drtu doing any work In Connection with the construction, reconstruction
or repair of said facilities restore said premises as nearly As feasible
to the Condition In whsCh saint, were found before such work was undertaken,
including repair of all fenC@S that might be oiStvrbed or damaged in per.
forming said work, and fvrthel• upon the condition that In the use of the
aforesaid rights And orivlleges herein nranted, the City of Denton,
Texas, will not Create a nuisance or do an,t act that will be detrimental
:o said premises and that said tract will not be used by said City.of
Canton, Texas, for any otnor purpose, under this grant. except as
herein provided,
WIVICSS CUA HANOS this -~~~day of
a,J, 1391,
i -4;
• :~rct1.11.:1 ract 8i3~
I
T CCU N' 4 of $ YCls~11 ?w 670
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for paid
county, Texa , on this y pe pally appeared
to me to be at person whose name si ( $ubaertbedato
the foregoing instrument, and ackno-Mdged to me that S he
executed the same for the purposes and consideration` tFere
expressed,
GIVEN UNDER .`fY RAND AM UAL Or OFFICE, This the ~~day
A.U. 19$L,
N D IN YD F
l CORK1'Sr T=At
My Commission expirest Qom: ,
TEM STATt OF TEXAS S
CotM1TY 08 S
BEFORE. ME, the undersigned authority, in and for, said
County, Texas, an this day personally appeared
to me to be the erso kho
the foregoing ir%strunen`t,wand ackmute n6wledged~ to (UT thaticri 'h; to
executed the same for the purposes and consideration ootT
expressed.
011-M UNDER NY NANO AND SEAL Or OFFICE, This the day
of r A.D. 19
NOTARY PUSLIC Iv A,`7D FOR
COUNTY, TEXAS
My Commission expirest'_,
T3E STAT° OF TMAS 5
COUNTY OF 5
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, in and for said
County, Texas, on this day personally appeared
known to ma to be the oersan an
or. cer whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,
and aaknoaledged to me that the same uas the act 02 the said
a
corporation, an that he e:<@CU t! tit! Same a9 the act Of
such corporation for ti%t purposes and consideration therein
expressed', and in the capacity therein stated.
GIVZO UNDER MY BAOD AND SEAL Of' OMCE, This the day
of , A.D. 19 .
ily ..~i.• 1J.~iV• 1. ~.i~y ij ~
ti
S ,
,o/a~ar ~oa~a
rr ..r dST
scAiE, /^=aa~' ~ ~',or~~•seN6vr 'I
! ALL pUA~d56'
~~1J~~j~l UT/L/TV E.ISCnNENr k i I •
y I'~1 n' to I I n
V'•~, 9 ~ ~ J'rMAOOAQY
CONSJ'I~GCT/ON E,aSMI' I
EACH s/rE I ~
Ii c
I
i1
a
UJE'ST 1?S9
LI
A4/Nr+~f3EGYNNING
,:lJlL/IN A. APEL, G, R5.
NOV 19B1 UrIC/rY ~',4SE'ME'N7'S'
~,9Tr?/C/< ~3~~~N Flux
• ~ r _ t - Il
I I
i
i / B 4~~~ a0a'~
Y171~N Rl m 11 71gM /.4. •'M 1Ir
a'>71N >D Jx' O.• Y,nr WY.J~i r1,9~i O.J 11 .IQ,
t w1 ••,k. •I I M• ~~I. C'
7fr/t0 ! I
r ~a 6A 1~~~
4.4.o
II 3
II $
I I. V
' II
II
II
I I r+
I~ x
!/D!. X17 /a! I I
~ I I
rl
I tiL s ~~.~,G.
T✓I voL adl
V~1~'LI~ r
I
I
I
+ ~I
II
i"w.ys u,ve r r 2 t A7r'
iMWN
tlp i+.~gb6 :ter?s :+r rs d
• !1~`" ~,Sy 3 J ''✓N~fQLf TD 2.5~':
TnE STATE OF TEXAS I
KNOW ALL MEN 9Y r1i E PRESENTSI
OF EC:T01; CORRECTION EASEMENT
T^AT PHYLLIS LEE ARFEN
for and in consideration of the sum of one
00114r ($1.00) Cash to us in nand paid by the City of Canton, Texas, a
municipal corporation of the County of oenton, State of Texas, the receipt
of which it hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable eonsideration
including the benefits that will accrue to ow-r- property, 40 hereby GIVE,
GRANT and EXTEND to the said City of.0ent6n, Texas, its successors,p4
assigns, thio right to construct or reconstruct utilities and perpetually
maintain in A11,Purpose Utility Ea owt In, upon and across land described
as follows:
Said Troct being in the Wm. NEIL Survey, Abstract 970 ,
Denton County, Texas, and Recorded in Yolume 427 , Page 183 , in
the Owed Records of Denton County, Texas,
$aid easement crossing this property comprising two parts, as herein
designated and described, including ill a permanent easement 20 feet
in width, for construction, or reconstruction of utilities ano appurt-
enances, 3ud for perpetually maintaining an All Purpose Utility Ease.
went, and I'') an additional area adjacent to the permanent easement
_4Q - feet in width, to be used for initial construction. •
PART I, PthMANENT EASEMENT WITH CENTERLINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSI
9EGINNINO at a point in the South tine of the aforementioned.traet of
land, said point being West a distance of 256.9 feet from the
Southeast corner Of said traetl
THENCE North 02 degrees 47 minutes 60 seconds West a distance of 1307.7 feet to a
4oint In the North fence line of said tract, said point being In the South
1ne of Airport Road and being 342.0 feet West of the Northeast Corner of
said tract.
Thds document is to correct the center line bearing and distance of North
OE oo'N 1306.75' as shown In the dOOUMdMt recorded in volume 1111 page
668 of the deed records of Denton County, Texas
FART 2, CO::iRUCTION EASEMENT
In addition .o tho 20 foot permanent easement as deseribed above, an initial
t' ast t•"" 'n 'c s t t•. f en'shed, a s aase=•I ent
:a .a' i•d'. et,a•. .,r r. ...•draEssa-.e~,;ee
e . ,
Oit? Oa ;intOn,' eat, 5,1411 have the right and privilege to remove
Y.C ciszose tf, cff :ne site, trfts, Jrv$A, 40bris, exCISO exaeavated
'd:aridl, e7C, tr. ;tie laseiaents, that 6004 interfare with access to the
Construction site and that would interfere with construction Of the said
facilities.
TO HAVE A!* TO HOW, all singular, the privileges aforesaid to it,
the said City of Canton, Texas, its successors and assigns foriver,
together with the right and privilege, at any and all tim?$ to enter said
pramises or any part thereof, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing
cnd perpetually maintaining said facilities together with necessary appurte-
nances inside said perpetual easements and for raking connections therewith;
all upon the eon.ition that the City of Canton, Texas, will at all times;
after doing any work in connection with the etnstrvetion, reconstruction
or repair of said facilities restor>t'said preaiises as naarly a feesiblt
to the condition in which. same were found before such work was undertaken,
including repair of all fences that might., be disturbed or damaged in pir.
forming said work, and further upon the condition that to the use of the
aforesaid rights and privileges herein granted, the Cit; of Denton,
' Texas, will not crane a nuisance or do any act that will be detrimental
to said premises and that said tract will not be used by said City-.of
Oenton, Texas, for any other purpose, under this grant, except as
herein provided.
WITNESS CUA HANDS thi; day of A.D. 198,.,
• s
=3 STATE OF "AS §
COt7: T Y OF §
BEFO?x M4, the undersigned authority, in and for said
County, Teyas, on this day personally appeared
tc ae to be the person whose name known
{ s) ( are) subscribed to
Lhe foregoing instrume t, and acknowledged to me that he
executed t;je same for the purposes and consideration there1:i
expressed.
Git';N LrNDEFi WAND A,4D SEAL OF OFFICZ, This the day
pf A.D. 19
1
A1/1F'OU7' t1W o
wear
y - ~ I 341.0
SG4LE: PW' E sb AEPi414N6VT
1 AGG , 4-A SE
41m/TV~ISFMFNr i I
NI. , 9 as ~ r~/.,~ovoY
1 ~ P coNSracrr~av costar ~ ~ ~
EACM S/rJE I1I ~ M
~I
l1JEST I 1559'
AaAT l AralmmV.-
r by f , 1Y.r
di 1 sw ~.i .i s• ~.r~ ~ u~''.~~~C
91x
_ ~r.L...uJl..r..~l.r ~.1l'.u+r...A~. 1.. ..~r:i •:~..rL
i ;
N0.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A UTILITY EASEMENT
WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A
QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE
CITY IN SAID EASEMENT TO THE OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED
BY SAID EASEMENTI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, acting
pursuant to law, and upon the request and petition of the
grantee herein, deems it advisable to abandon and convey the
hereinafter described tract of land to grantee and is of the
opinion that.said utility easement is not needed for public use,
and that same should be abandoned and quitclaimed to the Phyllis
Breen Estate, as hereinafter provided and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is of the
opinion that the best interest and welfare of the public will be
served by abandoning and conveying the same to the Phyllis Breen
Estate, for the consideration hereinafter more fully set fortht
now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONs
SECTION I.
That the fallowing described tract of land in the City of
Denton be and the same is hereby abandoned, vacated and closed
insofar as the right, title and easement of the public are
concernedi
Said tract being in the Wm. Neil Survey, Abstract No. 970,
Denton County, Texas, and recorded in Volume 427, Page 183 in
the Deed Records of Denton County, Texast
Said easement crossing this property, comprising two parts as
herein designated and described, including (1) a permanent
easement 20 feet in width for construction or reconstruction of
utilities and appurtenances, and for perpetually maintaining an
all purpose utility easement and (2) an additional area adjacent
to the permanent easement 40 feet in width, to be used for
initial construction.
PART 1. PERMANENT EASEMENT WITH CENTERLINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSs
BEGINNING at a point in the south line of the aforementioned
tract of land, said point being west a distance of 255.9 feet
from the southeast corner of said tracts
THENCE north 01°00' west a distance of 1305.75 feet to a point
in the north fence line of said tract, said point being in the
south line of Airport Road and being 278.69 feet west of the
northeast corner of said tractt
PART 2. CONSTRUCTION EASMENT
In addition to the '20 foot permanent easement as described
above, an initial construction easement 40 feet in width is 'to
be furnished. This easement shall be adjacent and parallel to
the permanent easement and shall be 20 feet in width on each
side of said permanent easement. The construction easement to
be used for initial construction only.
PAGE ONE
t
SECTION -II
That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby authorized to
execute and deliver that certain quitclaim deed attached hereto
and incorporated herein conveying said utility easement described
therein to the Phyllis Breen Estate,
SECTION III.
That portion of the public utility easement herein described
is made subject to all existing zoning regulations and deed
restrictions, if any, and subject to all existing easement rights
of others, if any, whether apparent or not.
SECTION IV,
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and
effect f,:om and after the date of its passage, and it is so
ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, this the day of October, 1983.
CHARD 0. STE ART, YOR
CITY OF DE;NTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYI _
' r f C-106--(1Clr CLAIM or'111) THE STA'L'E OF TEXAS, KNOW ALL mEN BY THESE PRESENTSi
COUNTY OP DrNToN 11 '
That THE CITY OI' DENTON, TEXAS, A MVNTCIP:,L CORPORATION
of the County of DENTON and State of TEXAS for and in consideration of
the sum of------_'--------_---_....----.----. 'i
--TEIQ AND 00/100 ($10,00) j; and other good and valuable consideration DOLLARS,
to it in hand p aid by y Phyllis Breen Estate
of the County of Denton and State of Texas , the receipt of which
i'
Is hereby acknowledged, do, by these presents, BARGAIN, SELL, RELEASE, AND FOREVER ii
QUIT CLADI unto the said Phyllis Breen Estate, its
~j heirs and assigns, all its right title and interest in and to that certain traot or par-
cel of land lying in the County of Denton and State of Texas, described as follows,
f to-wit:
aid tract being in the 11m. Neil Survey, Abstract No, 970, Denton County,
exas, and recorded in Volume 427, Page 183 in the Deed Records of Denton
ounty, Texas I
aid easement crossing this property, comprising two parts as herein ~M
asignated and described, including (1) a permanent easement 20 feet in
idth for construction or reconstruction of utilities and appurtenances, ~i
i nd for perpetually maintaining an all purpose utility easement and (2)
!J n additional area adjacent to the permanent easement 40 feet in width, ;
o be used for initial construction.
PART 1, PERMANENT EASEMENT WITH CENTER-LINE DESCRIBED As POLLOWSs
1 !i
1EGINNING at a point in the south line of the aforementioned tract of
and, said point being west a distance of 255.9 feet. from the southeast ii
orner of said tracts
HENCE north O1°00' west a distance of 1305.75 feet to a point in the
earth fence line of said tract, said point being in the south line of
Airport Road and being 278.69 feet west of the northeast corner of said
racti
'I
ART 2. CONSTRUCTION EASMENT
n addition to the 20 foot permanent easement as described above, an
nitial construction easement 40 feet in width is to be furnished. This
asement shat; be adjacent and, parallel to the permanent easement and
'hall be 20 feet in width on each side of said permanent easement. The
onstruction easement to be used for initial construction only.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, together with all and singular the rights, privi.
E leges and appurtenances thereto in any manner belonging unto the satdphyllis Breen Estate ;
i
fI its heirs and assigns, forever, so that neither the said
City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation, its successors
nor )idtifi~W any person or persons claiming under it shall, at any time horeafter,
R
~I have, claim
or demand any right or title to the aforesaid premises or appurtenances, or any part there-
11 of, .
f WITNESS band at Denton, Texas this
day of October A. D 1983
ti'itnesses at Request of Grantor: CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST: BY
. _ ~ _ - _ . W
CHARLOTT ..E ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
1 ,
1
October 4, 1983
CITY COUNCIL EMERGENCY AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT;
Consider Consultant Service Agreement for Major Inspection
of Electrical Generating Unit #2,
SUMMARY
The City of Denton Electric Production Division has used
Mr. C. A. Rogers for several years for assisting our
maintenance personnel on maintenance of the electric
generating units, The City's insuran:e carrier has
recommended that the unit be inspected at this time
interval, Mr, Rogers is a retired General Electric
serviceman who is very familiar with our type equipment,
FISCAL SUMMARY;
Contract Amount $7,848,00
Source of Funds; 610-008-0251-8339-E510
ACTION REQUIRED;
Approval of Independent Contractor's Agreement with C. H.
Rogers,
ALTERNATIVES;
A service contract could be executed with General Electric
Company, but would be at a higher cost,
RECOMMENDATION;
The Staff recommends approval of the subject Independent
Contractor's Agreement with C, H, Rogers, The Public
Utilities board will review this item at their special
called meeting of October 4, 1983, and their recommendation
will be presented at the Council meeting,
Respectfully,
R, E, Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Purchase Request
EXHIBIT 11 Independent Contractor's Agreement
PUACHAGN RIQUNGT PA NO,
OAT$- 9-9-83 PVNO 610
Halo 0251 008
RaqulNtlo oaparlmMl RMt, TRRMR AQRNOy
01Y10611 A 0251
twrowl 0404rtnwitAppowl OOL,OAYR ORGANIZATION „
To 8339
C. H. Rodgers RIO No, ORJROT
7030 Freemont E510
Dallas, Texas 75231 R/0
TO: CITY OF CBNTON STEAM PLANT
1701 Spencer Road
Denton, Texas 76205
ITRM STOCK NUMR[R O[SCRlpTION OUAN/UNIT PR101 AMOVN
11 Consultant Service for major repair on unit #2 24 days $304,50 $7,308,
2, Travel 8xpenses 90 miles X 24 days 2160 mi, $ ,25 $ 540,
(Work to start 10-3183. Finish 11-4-83)
O[LIVIRY OATR TOTAL, TAX 9X[MPT,
latlntalad to Lai,
Bid only Order today CartNkallon Of Funds
Last Fwahmd From Oalanca
OuotatlOM only Rush
Oats
pWM&MW AYwawl
x'101' luroh, Quota Pureh, Murehallnp ARant't Approval
Conllmms" Old purto
1 I
I
CITY of OENTGN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (317) 566$200
H M0RANDUM
TO#. EI B. Tullos, Assistant Director of Utilities
FIRM Walker Hale, !luperintendent, Electric Production
DAM September 9, 1983
5UBJECTi Consultant Charges
consultant charges for Charles Rodgers on unit #2
followf
24 days @ $327,00 per day Total Cost $7,848,00
Work will begin on October 3, 1983 and finish on November 4,
1983,
Walker Hale, uPerint6ndent
Electric Production uiviaion
WH/bj
I
DRAFT
INDBPHN08NT CONTRACTOR' AGREIDIENT'
TH$ STATE OF TEXAS
XNOV ALG 1-1121 07 1'HGSR P1B5Btl'Pd:
COUNTY OF DDNTON }
The City of Donton, Texas, a Muniatpal Rome Rule pity
situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called '+City+',
acting herein by and through its Clty.Manager, and
,
hereinafter called Contractor, hereby mutually agree as followx:
1, SBRVICES TO BE PERFOR•IEDI City hereby, retains
Contractor to perfoz'm the hereinafter designated services and
Contractor agree3 to perform the following,services I
Supsrvlslon and consultant service for the OentOn Sieo, Gen, Unit. Y, r,
the lnspectlon of the fnrbiAe, generator, and
It's components,
,
H, odgers
ate
2. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONTRACTOR:. City agrees to pay
Contractor for the services performed hereunder as follows:
A. Amount of Payments for Services:
;7,308,00
B, Trnnsportotion Costs!
I.
Mileago, 90 Milos per day for 24 days giving 2160 miles,
9o X 24 X 01,25 (Cost per mile) *$$40,00.
C. Dittos of Payments I
Within ten'uays of completion of inspection
S. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY; It is mutually
understood and agreed by and between City and Contractor that,
Contractor is an independent Contractor and shall not be deemed
to be or considered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas for
the purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes,
vacation or sick leave banofits, or any other city employee
benefit, The City shall not have supervision and control of
Contractor or any employee of Contractor, but it is expressly
understood that Contractor shall perform tho services hereunder
at the direction of and to tho satisfaction of the City Manager
of the City of Denton or his designeo under this agreement.
[:fll%1'GND??"'f C6Pk'R,IC'fU;t'5 Awjunmsi' - PAGr 2
f 4, yon,+l.li n; lu,~~)St „ia {ywen,~~ ho Lantructor ardor cl~Lc
agr"Mont are to be pnid by thu City from rundo approprintod by
f the City Council for such purpooios in the Budgot of tho Ciiy of
f; Denton,
{ S. SERVICES AND SUPPUBS TO I38 PURNIS112D_By Ciryl C,lty
agrees to furnish to Contractor the following services and/or
suppliesi
None
6. rNSURAXCEr Contractor shall'provide at his own cost and
expense workmen's compensation insurance, liability insurance,
and all other insurance necessary to protect Contractor in the
operation of Contractor's business,
7. CANCELLATION, City reserves the right to cancel this
Agreement at any time by giving Contractor thirty (30) days
written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement,
8. TERM OF CONTRACT, This Agreement' shall commonc.3 on
the J day of , 1983, and and on the
day of 198.
INDrIMI MN'T C011 RACr'01IS AGAS SIGNT - ,PACE 3
MUM this day of , 1983
f CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYi
ATTESTi
i
UUK4TART
r APPROVED AS TO LHOAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
BYt
ROBERT H. NELSON ,
is hereby designated as the person to administer the provision of
this agreement.
MY MANACIER
UAVB
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR'S AGREEMENT - PAGE 4
A
R E S O L U T I O N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASi
SECTION I.
The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby casts
all of its 560 votes for Raymond Pitts as a member of the Board
of Directors of the County Wide Appraisal District for the
County of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
This Resolution shall become effective from and after its
date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of October, 1983.
RICHARD O. STEWART 1A OR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETAR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
C
C. J. AYLOR, CI'PY ATTORNEY
CITY F DENTO ,TEXAS
AGENDA ~
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, October 41 1983
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 4, 1983, at 5r30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
11 Discussion of City of Denton user fee survey,
2. Discussion of annexat'on of a proposed 15 acre mobile
home subdivision located along the west side of
Swisher Road,
3. Executive Sessions
A. Legal Matters Under sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. ;:(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T,S.
C. Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 625217 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
September 23, 1983, at 7:00 P.M. in the council chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7100 P.M.
1. Consider approval of a resolution in appreciation of
Bruno P. Diaz for 30 years of service with the City of
Denton Utility Department.
2. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Special Called
meeting of September 130 1983.
3. Consent Agenda)
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the city Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1, aid #9164 Phoenix Sidewalk Project
2. Bid #9188 P.C.B. Disposal
3. Bid #9189 Distribution Transformers
4. Bid #9193 Drainage Improvement
5. Bid #9194 Wire and Cable
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 4, 1983
Page Two
B, Contractst
11 Consider approval of an amendment to extend
contract with Group Graphics for the final
printing of the Economic Development
Factbook,
C. Plats and Rep.latst
11 Consider approval of the final replat of
lots 9 and 10, block D, Forrestridge
Addition, Section 11. (The Planning and
Zoning commission recommends approval,)
2. Consider approval of the final replat of
lots 6 and 7, Phillips Addition (The
Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval,)
3. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
the Hannah Estates Addition, (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Consider approval of the final plat of the
Hillhaven Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
5. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
the Ambika Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning commission recommends approval.)
6. Consider approval of the preliminary replat
of lots 3, 4, 5, 6, and part of lot 21
Mercer Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
7. Consider approval of the preliminary and
final plat of lot it block 1, DISD
Elementary School Addition. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Public Hearingst
A. H-28. This is the petition of Mr, and Mrs. A. W.
Woolsey requesting historic landmark (H) zoning
designation at 619 Grove Street, The property is
more particularly described as lot 31 block 1,
Woodland Addition. (The Historic Landmark
Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 4, 1983
Page Three
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving historic
landmark (H) zoning designation at 619 Grove
Street,
B, Z-1605, This is the petition of Brian Burke
representing Snider Development corporation
requesting a change in zoning from agricultural
(A) to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 34.37 acre parcel beginning
adjacent and north of the intersection of U. S,
fiwy. 77 and Windsor Drive. If approved, the
planned development (PD) would permit the
following land uses:
Single Family Detached on 19,54 acres
(104 lots with a typical size of 65'x100')
Duplexes - on 3.71 acres
Townhouses - on 3,49 acres
Street right of way - on 4,60 acres
Open Space - on 2.60 acres
Drainage Easement - on 0.43 acre
(The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval.)
11 Adoption of an ordinance approving a change
in zoning from agricultural (A) to the
planned development (PD) classification on a
' 34.37 acre parcel beginning adjacent and
north of the intersection of U. S. Highway
77 and Windsor Drive.
5. Consider approval of the preliminary and final plats
of lot 40 block 139, Sauls Addition. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
6. Ordinancesr
A. Consider adoption of a franchise ordinance with
General Telephone (third reading).
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
minimum standards for fuel farms, fueling
operations, fueling trucks and fueling personnel
at the Denton Municipal Airport. (The Airport
Advisory Board recommends approval.)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting minimum
wages for City of Denton construction projects.
City of Dental, City Council Agenda
October 41 1983
Page Four
D, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 35,66 acres of land
located at the southwest corner of FM 2181 and
Hickory Crook Road, (Z-1609)
P", Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 1,125 acres of land
located on the east and west sides of Mayhill
Road north of I-35E.
F, consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
Lime and place for public hnaringB concerning the
annexation of approximately 367 acres of land
located between 1-35W and the Santa Fe Railroad.
a, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 43.9 acres of land
located west of I-35W.
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for public hearings concerning the
annexation of approximately 11014.4 acres of land
located west of I-35W and south of Highway 380.
7. Resolutionat
A. Consider adoption of a resolution in Support of
the arc,enbelt Corridor at Lake Ray Roberts.
B. Consider adoption of a resolution supporting the
adoption of a constitutional. amendment
authorizing the expenditure of public funds for
the relocation of sanitary sewer laterals upon
private property.
C, Consider adoption of a resolution in protest of
the Korean civilian airliner incident.
8. Consider nominating Raymond Pitts to the Board of
Directors of Denton County Appraisal District.
9. Consider approval of the 1983 City of Denton tax roll.
10. Consider approval of appointment of Deputy City
Secretaries.
11. Official action on executive session items
A. Legal Matters
B, Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
,
City of Denton City Council Agenda
October 4, 1983
Page Five
124 New Business
This item provides a se0tion for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas,
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the -_,_day of , 1983 at
o'clock (a.m.) (p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1039C
j
cirvot oomroN, rexAS MUNICIPAL SUILOING / 06N TON, ?'ERAS 76201 / TELEPHONE {817} 5668200
M1;NI0RANDUNI
'Poi Mayor and Members of the City Council
F'RONI: Charlotte Allen, City Secretary
DAM September 280 1983
SUBJBC'1'I CITY 0V DEN'PON USER FHJ 8 U1tVLI Y
7'he survey information will be delivered to you prior to the council meeting next
'Puesday,
Charlotte Allen, C ty Secreteryu -
vvw
1384M
r
MEMQRANDUM
Dater September 26, 1983
Too G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
Fromi (~j~lJ Charles Watkins, senior Planner
Rei Discuss annexation of a proposed fifteen (15) acre
mobile home subdivision located along the west side
of Swisher Road,
The Development Review committee held a pre-application conference
with developers who are proposing a mobile home subdivision on the
west side of Swisher Road in the extra territorial jurisdiction.
A map of the proposed project was submitted showing a fifteen (15)
acre tract being divided into thirty-two (32) lots. Each of the
lots would be approximately 15,000 square feet in size or larger.
The map indicates use of wells for water and septic systems for
sewaga disposal.
This parcel of land was included with a large tract recommended
for annexation at a previous study session.
CWtlc
k ~',1 ~ 1 fii u I{ _,,.y_'~ 'I l' If1"rr (f 3 '''ii '1 'tl
~i I--v I } E' lr ~ 'v1' ' 1 (I Iii' ~M:
I f j f 11 { /L I S,ik )i ~IrXv w
!'II I, ,}I II'tl ~ I'r I r1 Iv~,t•-I •,r5,{ fl,l1~.. I r I( f r4 4 y I'
.~~'1 ,v ~1 i L. r''a1,+ 1. { 11 E 'r 'r" I i I ~ ~I~~
~ III I ~ • . 0 f {f I r
I (•v If _L.-~ /y 1\\n I ~11'+.'i E(` I'•i 'y I~{ i r II IL•~M I
~.,,I r 1 1 I ''r 1 I I
IUD ~i ~I• ~ I! ~ ♦ 1 ~ , 4~ k , ' ~p .~1. ~ '"ter
~ ~ ~ '•,,I a 1 11I'•. E I: ( ' Q '4, - I 4/ 1 I I 1, . f
I j f• r ' ; I r'
I I, r
I '9 iLr t' l~ '°Y _ •r` I` I ,I, , _1 4R"" d1'r
'fit I tir" II 'k~/ r r • r~ } .'W ` ,11; .
r•,41' -'T`. r, 41 k~ I ',,'1l ~ rr v t. , ,F ,~a
_W'I+~ ..'?II'~rl S~jj•ItiwAl± ' I /IIiI I>\. S 4
~4'Ir n~: Y .J.• S,_.`.-~ II • 'Ki: ' , ~ ,~17~ I ~Y ~~Y.,'r, t
(}t~ .I r Ih. IM, I YY. X111
u l , 1
j r It. I , IE 1' ft11; i I i r, lE f ,1 WTI F~~'., ' va .~'•y
~ t ~ r II'I` 1 E i ~r r ~'I } i 'r'~4 ''•r ' rl, i•
!I /f I r I rS , r y , IrxiY r• • I it . u
' ' I ~~I pr r~ .uu ,j Y: •rr/ Irr ri ,1 r
`7- ~ y • t
ti• , ~ ♦ r YI.. r1~ • ,
r, I
bl. a LI , Ip 1'r r
I} , IP'" "b 13•ii tl 'rl" I3 i I~r. uu:: I.t''y , 11 'L f''0 , rrL,
f , y ,r, / tir ' L
I SL' IIr~nl,. ~~µ1,/`II 1 II/ I! r1. 1f1 r,llllr: , II I/ly/ .4 f 4'. 'a
ii 111 '1 Mj'~'x;4( {~('1•[I rlhli t • ~ll~~'~. / '1/,v I, 1
' f i •Mw • . h ' P yv ,I r
' 'vf!'I. ~ v 1 It~ I lu•• ,u rL'~L~ 4''Ih• ,r I I ~ 13•~ ,L,, ,,I +,I~ i' I
F, t , 4 ,'~-OS S 1~ u r { rY y I'0• I I r ',L0 1 v 6
. ti ,'4~ }II{ ~0: L L I,y l v1 v`r ' 1 7 I,
rr ♦rr..J~ ,,I. !(1 '1 ir~ r• , iI I •w . ~ i ( 1t{ L }
• ,}fr } I t vi' 4 I 1 ( ~ a,.: ~ I r~} E I ! 'E E 1 I
I ! +
~ ,IY~,~ ,I•"Y'Mn' i Irl• ! I Yx1 1`. 1 I ! .I♦ I( ~ .11•. •
~ fi I! i . ; I it 't II r~' •a;;'~ •-,I;:' ;,I tins IZLw;~
rl~ C f
~ N.._ aea,
"iI y; iuVN/ M.I• I .x~ I•u'~ri f ~ •'~'ll
II
5 ? A . a I1, r I J I I
~ 11~IE r~. l I i O~
V,. f I, I I /l I~ j~ /
Ir O . •y ,h G~
' ~ u 'I. ` /w ' f r
M W fie.. yl Www..Yr...l Y......,..._..
309. 6' .
a i f
N ~ ^Ya~ v ~ I 104.Tp~
1
4
MA7HIl4 N AO ~ I ~ ~ O AI
I _
~1 I ~ III t
1 126AT I
B 11HER R y ~ i~ ((f a rj
II r I .J
r ~ I
I eI
iI"~W ul a p 9) ~I
ti .y 1 I
n I I2a 01
r =
N ~1
5 n
o I Y I
mI 13.71 I ~ S
Y i~ g m I !
gal
a If ~ 4 x i~ ~C'~
x
I /C°S2~S'E. N.
1 103.[1 121.91 I
N0°07'48"E 9 371.33' r~ q~ rl a s ~r D Lot • • N I A
/ I IS$,p' 60' 15341' I IO~ Lm of
Si
!A 1 I1~~ ~ N ,SS. {2 ~ I~ A I ~ R ~ W
• I: 1 .6 ~k' 30 40,04 :II I~ A ~I W
coo. $ 444 II v X Ct q
1
125oe
U N.0°01N.0°or'16'L. IC'i0•
I 33 6T ryo Iss, 56 II e,
la eI I ' w To
m
! N. I W
do ~i I>p ~ ~ I ~ I
I r5 i •.'r M 'ea I~ ~ "v I~ 1
x °1 >
i r I I 122.63 l
166.54 1 16N
I
r rIIr lkO°0257"L
153.6! Vol 11ES,49 I 122.62 1219!'
I
1y so' elp lm" ° N
N 'Lw' e°ua4 L 1r~1.1°4~f~ ' SrJ61r1~n4 '
' IS6.Ul 60' 15$44 S' 1 1 12l.l6' {O' 124 . eS' r
$WI$HER ROAD K,
~n op"dattnn of
'BRUMO OJAZ+
WHEREAS, Bruno Diaz is retiring from the City of Den Con
elfeotive potober 6, 19831 and
WHEREAS, Bruno DIAZ has served as An employee of the City of
Denton from October 31, 1993 to OOCnber 61 19831 and
WHEREAS, Bruno Diaz has been a faithful, dedicated and
hardworking employee in the Wastewater Treatment plant
for the past thirty years) and
WHEREAS, the management stale and fellow employees of Nr. Bruno
Diaz have enjoyed and appreciated working with Mr.
Diaz throughout these years!
NOW, TBEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY rHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or
DENTON, PEWt
that the city Council of the City of Denton, acting on
behalf of the citizens and staff, wish to aoknowladge
with grateful appreolacion the services of Bruno Diaz,
and the devotion he has given to the City of Denton in
the performance of his duties during his thirty years
with the City of Denton, and order that this
Resolution be made A part of the official Rinutes of
the City Council to be a permanent record of the City
of Denton, and that a copy be forwarded to him, Bruno
Diaz, as an expression of our sincere appreolation,
PASSED AND APPROVED this 4th day of October, 1983,
RICRARD 0. SPEWART, NAYOA
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENr011, TEXAS
Ar?r,JVs'L AS T;". i,4aAL N&ie
AD
airy aovwom, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (817) 5668200
September 21, 1983
Mr Bruno Diaz Or_r
' .t iarls
19i6 Boyd Street
Denton, Tx 76201
Dear Mr. Diaz;
We are pleased to advise you that you will be formally presented
your retirement plaque for 30 years of service to the City of Denton
at the Denton City Council Meeting scheduled for October 4, 1983,
700 PM, in the City Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building
(City Hall). Your family, of course, is encouraged to be with you
on this special occasion.
I would like to take this opportunity to personally extend my
congratulations on your long and very outstanding career with the
City. It has been a pleasure to work with you, and I wish you the
best of luck and much personal fulfillment in the years ahead.
Sincerely,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
RRNtgcr
cc; City Secretary, City of Denton b'✓
Personnel Department
0. David Ham, Asst. Dir, of Utilities, Wtr/WW
Robert King, Supt., WWTP
file
2490U/2
i
c ,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 13, 1983
The Council convnned into a work session at 5130 p.m, in the Civil
Defensa Room to discuss the proposed 1983-84 Annual Program of
Services,
PRESENT, Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro TOM Riddlesperger; Council
Members Alford, Barton, Chow, Hopkins, and stophens
city Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ASSENTi None
City Manager Chris Hartung began the discussion of proposed revenue
producing programs,
Bill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant, reported on the
benefits on animal registration stating that notifyyiny owners of
impounded pets is expedited if the pet le registered, The quicker
the pet is clalmud, the lose time the Animal Control Division would
have to feed and clean up after the animal,
Council Member Riddlesperger asked who would issue the registration,
Angelo responded that Animal Control could administer the
registration,
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if there was any reason why the
veterinarians could not handle the process,
Assistant City Manager Svehla responded that some veterinarians
would be willing to take over the registration. There were various
methods which could be used including veterinarian registration or a
mail-in registration.
council Member Riddlesperger asked if there would be an annual fee.
Svehla responded that there would.
The Council then heard from representatives of David M. Griffith
Company regarding the results of a cost recovery study. Mr. Mark
Epstein stated that the purpose of the study was not to maximize
fees, but rather to determine the actual cost of services provided
by the City and methods by which the costa could be recovered.
Epstein then reviewed the methodology used by David M. Griffith to
determine how costs of services were allocated, The study indicated
that the currant fee structure and pricing resulted in 37.4% of the
cost of services being received in revenue with the city subsidizing
the remaining 62.6%. The proposed fees would result In 68,21 in
revenue with a 31,68 City subsidy, Even with thu increased fees, a
certain percentage of the total cost of services would have to be
subsidized.
Epstein then presented over-head projections showing comparisons of
various city services, such as street cuts, ambulance service, fire
inspections, playgrounds, etc., by cost, revenue and percentage of
coat recovered, A realizable increase in revenues of approximately
$689,385 would be possible. An alternative revenue section was
developed for those services where an increase In fees would not
create a decrease in demand, such as building permits.
Mr, Frank Coulussi itemized several areas which could most increase
revenues. These areas included airport leases, animal impoundment
euthanasia fees, street out fees, fines for wood violations,
olactrical permits, plat and zoning change filing fees, and others,
A preliminary written reports was distributed with the final report
to be delivered on September 20.
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of September 13, 1983
Page Two
The Council then convened into the special called meeting at 7100
p.m, in the Council Chambers,
PRESENTI Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespergari Council
Members Alford, Barton, chow, Hopkins, and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ARSENTI None
1, The council held a discussion on Supplemental Agreement fl
to the Ray Roberts and Lewisville lakes recreational contracts with
the federal government,
nob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the City of Denton
had entered into a contract with the federal government in 1980 for
the construction of the Ray Roberts reservoir, one contract was for
water storage and another for recreational facilities, The cities
of Denton and Dallas were responsible for 50% of the initial capital
development and 100% of the operation of the recreational facilities
on tna project. Many things had resulted from working with the
Corps of Engineers and the City of Dallas during the last two year
in the development of recreational plans, The Texas Department of
Parks and Wildlife had verbally committed to participate in late
duaois Park and provide the 50% funding, This would relieve Denton
and Dallas from the substantial amounts of recreation initial
development coats. A tentative agreement had been reached foe the
state to operate the recreational facilities.
The supplemental agreement before the council contained several
isaues, including the proposed greenbalt corridor, Nelson display ad
slides showing the comparative cost figures from the initial
contract and the supplemental agreement, Included in the agreement
' were :ost figures for Ray Roberta reservoir recreational development
coats, Lewisville lake recreational coats, Ray Roberts fish and
wildlife enhanoement, and the greenbalt corridor. The initial coat
for the City of Denton in the supplemental agreement was $2,216
million initially and $1,8 million in the future with no operation
and maintenance costs.
Nelson than reported that state's participation in Lake Ray Roberts
would include the responsibility for Isle duaois park, the operation
and maintenance of Ray Roberts, a wetlands development, fish rearing
faoilities anti the greenbalt corridor, The wetland development
would be 7 areas totaling approximately 1000 acres for the purposes
of trapping rainwater and to lure in seasonal waterfowl. The
greenbelt corridor would be approximately 2,000 feet wide and 6
miles long between bake Ray Roberts and Lewisville Lake, The 1,859
acre corridor would accommodate canoeing and rafting, stream
fishing, horseback riding trails, and areas for walking, hiking and
nature study. The state had looked at this concept in 1969 and felt
that it was a coat effective alternative to new recreational
facilities at Lewisville Lake,
Nelson the,., reported on the greenbelt corridor coat comparison. The
development of recreational facilities at Lewisville Lake would cost
$4,322,430 with Denton's share totaling $561,912, The dove opment
coat of the greenbelt corridor would be $3,095,100 with Denton
paying $201,182. Local annual charges (total for Denton, Dallas and
the State), including amortization, operations and maintenance, for
Lewisville Lake would be $265,230 and $102,436 for the greenbelt,
The total coat of Denton's share would be $68,960 for recreational
facilities at Lewisville Lake compared to $6,810 for the greenbelt
corridor.
The Corp of Engineers he' submitted the supplemental agreement to
the Division headquarters in Dallas. All of the provisions of the
agreement had been approved except the greenbelt corridor, pending
further information from the Ft. Worth office and public hearings,
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 10, 1980
Page Three
Nelson concluded by stating that the report was intended to be
informational only and would be submitted for Council approval at a
later data,
city Manager Chris Hartung commented that the overall plan was a
very exalting prospect for this region and could be very beneficial
to the people In this pert of the state, tt was an example of
10141, elate, and federal government working together to provide
long range planning. The original goal of the project was to secure
a water supply, but there was a requirement to develop a recreation
Plan. The entitle Involved were working to fulfil thls requirement
in the most cost effective manner and still meet the terms of the
contract.
Council Member Ricldlesperger stated that he would like to hear the
general view of those persona in opposition to the greenbelt
corridor, Riddleeperger further stated that with the Increases in
population, this type of recreational facility would be needed.
Mr. Roger Hamilton, from the corps of Engineers, reported that
recreation tplan hadgb been maitha led in conJideration of
Cost and the corridor
nvir nmental
impact assessment studies had been completed, The comments which
the Corp had received had either bean strongly pro or strongly con.
Persons owning property in the proposed corridor were opposed while
environmental groups and persons living outside the corridor were in
favor. Mr, Hamilton stated that as a result of the Interest which
had been generated, a public meeting would be held at 7100 p.m. on
September 26 in Aubrey for the purpose of giving a brief overview of
the proposal and to solicit comments from all parties,
Mayor Stewart stated that he had been asked if property owners in
the area would be allowed water rights for their livestock,
Mr. Hamilton responded that he was not versed In Texas water law,
but that every effort would be made to make appropriate aoucassions
with the property owners, if the proposal for the greenbelt was
approved, the Corp would try to acquire only necessary lands with
appropriate vegetation,
Mayor Stewart asked if t:io size of the proposed corridor might be
reduced,
Hamilton replied that the chart showing the location of the corridor
was only conceptual and did not take into consideration property
lines, The chart displayed the area which contained tht, proper
vegetation characteristics,
The Mayor then asked if the corridor would primarily be land which
was in the flood plain.
Hamilton responded yes.
Council Member Stephens stated that ")ne of the concerns of the
property owners in the proposed greenbelt area was the issue of fair
eomp6nsation, Stephens asked how the Corps of Engineers arrived at
a dollar flgur, which was considered to be fair compensation.
Hamilton responded that the Corp of Engineers real estate personnel
would base any land purchases on fair market value by looking at
recent sales and making comparable sales decisions.
City Attorney C, J. Taylor reported that in oondemnation procedures,
the valuation would be the fair market value of the property the day
the Corp of Engineers took possession.
Nelson also reported that as part of this supplemental agreement, in
Pacornjksunction with
WildlifetDepartmentdhad naskedethats certain n water p rights the
assigned for usage. This assignment would be 204 acre feet per year
from the City of Denton.
city of Denton City Counoil minutes
meeting of September 13, 1983
Pnge Four
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if a portion of the property
which is now privately owned would be acquired as a flood easement,
Nelson rosponded that the area was now privately owned, but during
the development of Ray Roberts this land would be acquired as a
flood easement to handle overflow.
Roger Hamilton stated that the total greenbelt area would be lase
than 2000 acres with 400 currently owned as flowage easements for
the headwaters of Lake Lewisville, These flowage easements would be
converted to fee simple land.
Nelson reported that there was a thought that once the lake was
completed, the shoreline would be fixed and would never flood,
According to the documentation, during a 100 year flood condition on
Ray Roberta Lake, 955 acres would be flooded in the existing channel
area,
Mayor Stewart stated that these proaeedings were not a public
hearing but asked to hear from one representative from the audience,
Mr, Bill Lynch stated the notice in the newspaper said that this
1 would be a public hearing for input.
Mayor Stewart responded that the public hearing would be on
September 26 in Aubrey. Stewart asked for the wishes of the Council.
Council Member Chew stated that this had been advertised as a
request for input, he felt the council should hear from persons
wishing to spank.
Mr, t1bart Hughes stated that due to an influx of horse ranches in
the area north of Aubrey, the land was now selling for approximately
$7,000 to $9,000 per care, Mr. Hughes reported that he gas aware of
the environmental groups but the country had been developed under
free trade and he felt the greenbelt corridor was a mistake. There
were hundred of acres surrounding Lake Lewisville now with the same
sorts of facilities which were not being utilized, The Army was
projecting 1000 people a day would use the greenbelt corridor and he
felt this would not occur before the turn of the century,
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if Mr. Hughes did not feel
planning should be made now for the turn of the century,
Hughes responded not in this way,
Me. Ann Powell stated that she was purchasing a tract of land on old
McKinney bridge road and had just learned of this hearing, Me.
Powell stated that her concern was the problem which would be
created for the County and the residents near the project. One of
the reasons for development in this area was to avoid expanding
money for parks at Lake Lewiaville. The Corp has already closed one
park area at Lewisville due to lack of funds for operation and
maintenance, There was restricted access to other areas and parks
due to problems with undesirables. Ms. Powell stated that one of
her reasons for purahasing the land on the old McKinney bridge road
was to avoid traffic problems. According to the map which she had,
this road would provide access to the greenbelt. Given the funding
problems which the Corp had experienced at Lake Lewisville, Ms.
Powell stated that she felt it .'orJd be a mistake for the Corp to
undertake a major project, such as ihii, She also stated she felt
the greenbelt corridor wou'.1 ^reate nabstantial security problems,
Thw County would be inroad !.o ',prove St, Johns road to handle the
Increase in traffic and t^.o :,h,,1tf' office could not adequately
patrol the areas around Lav.'nvill. ,o
Ms. Jackie Fuller, property owner from Aubrey, stated that she lived
closer to the creek than anyone else and would have the public at
her backdoor, If the Corp would negotiate, the price would
r _