HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-15-1983_11-01-1983
ARTHtl12 ANDERBRN cgC Co.
SUITH 04300
1001 ELL STRIXT
DAU,As. TAxAs 7*070
(e14) 741,0461
November 91 1983
Ir. C, Chris Hartung
City Manager
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Hartung)
The purpose of this letter is to summarize the proposal disoussed
with you to assist the City of Denton in a project to define the overall scope
of a new Fixed Asset System, We understand that the Fixed Asset System is a
high priority project for the City and we are very pleased to be submitting
this proposal to you,
Overall Approach
As we have discusseds we recommend you begin with the first phase of
a four phased approach (See Attachment), By utilizing this approach, we are
able to provide you with the neoessary information to direct And monitor the
overall systems effort, The phased approach provides checkpoints during the
overall project which allow the flexibility to modify the objectives, priorities,
approach, staffing and schedules based upon completed work and minimize the
commitment And investment in any single phase. The four phases are)
Phase 1- Define the System Scope
in this phase, we will define the major functions to be addressed
in the new system and how you are currently addressing these functions,
phase 2-- Refine the Functional Requirements and Identify Interim
Improvements
in this phase, the system processing features, reporting needs,
and overall level of detail for recordkeeping will be further devel-
oped. An approach for converting existing records/assets to the
new system should be defined. In conjunction with these activities,
certain interim improvements in your current procedures should be
defined.
AR'ruvR ANDERSEN SC Co.
Mr, G, Chris Hartung -2- November 9, 1983
Phase 3 - Software Anal vais and Selection
In Phase 3, the functional requirements developed in Phase 2
should be translated into aystem criteria. The adequacy of the
current LGFS Fixed Asset and Job Costing modules in meeting these
criteria should be evaluated, If necessary, other software paokage
alternatives will be evaluated and findings and recommendations
praaented to you,
Phase 4 - Implementation
In the final phase, the fixed asset software selected in Phase 3
will be installed and the initial data files for the current assets
built,
As you can see, this is a building block approach and has proved very
successful on other similar engagements. The remainder of this letter focuses
only on Phase I.
Project Ob.iertiyes and Scope
The objectives of this Fixed Asset - Scope Definition project will be
to assess the adequacy of your existing procedures and to identify the overall
functions of a new Fixed Asset System. As we have discussed, we will place
primary emphasis on the utility assets, but we will address the City's general
assets as well.
During this project we will interview various members of the City's
utility staff, review the existing records and procedures, assess the current
work order volume and review the current procedures for cost of service studies.
Project Deliverables
At the conclusion of this Scope Definition project, we will present
to you, in Discussion Outline format, our findings and systems alternatives,
In addition, we will define the approach for proceeding with Phase 2.
Staffing and Fee Arrangements
Based upon the objectives and scope discussed above, thr :ope
Definition project should take approximately 2-3 elapsed weeks, a.r. 'lilbur L.
Smither will have overall partner responsibility for the project. Ms. Julie F.
Nalson, an experienced consulting manager, and Mr. David E. Coburn, an
winc
Gl{~
i
~ Benda
~a.uce, f
~0 vem 6tr I ~ (9g3
R
+ + 1
' AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
November 1, 1983
Work Session of the city of Denton City Council on Tue
da ,
Municipall,6uIIdIn9 at30which ithehefoliil lowingfeitemsRoom will; the
considered;
6;30 P,m.
11 Discussion of new user fee rates in City of Denton,
24 Executive Session;
A, Leggal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 626217
Y,A,T,S,
B, Real Estate Under Sec, 2(fArt, 6262.17
Y, A, T, S,
C, Personnel Under Sec, 2(9), Art 626217 V.A.T.S.
01 Board Apppointments Under Sec, 2(gArt
6262-17 Y.A.T,S,
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
November 1, 1983, at 700 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered;
7;00 p.m,
Presentation of a retirement plaque to Mr. Dickey
Charles of the Denton Fire Department for 20 years of
service,
2. Presentation of the Sesquicentennial flag to the City
of Denton,
3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
October 189 1983,
44 Consent Agenda;
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his desigrde to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
11 Bid # 9196 - Filter Bed Media
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 1, 1983
Page Two
21 Bid # 9197 - Elevating Scraper
31 Bid # 9198 - Dic+,ating equipment
4, Purchase Order # 69678 to T.R.A,K,S,
6, Purchase Order # 60008 to Herb's Body Shop
6, Purchase Orders # 602840 60436 and 60436 all
to ISM
B, Plats and Replats;
11 Approval of the praliminary replat of the
Mesquite Ridge Townhouse Addition. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
2, Approval of the final replat of lots 3, 4,
61 6 and part of lot 29 Mercer Addition,
(The Planning and zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
3. Approval of the final replat of lot 2B,
Denton Shopping Center Addition. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
4. Approval of the final replat of the Reding
Addition, {The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
C, Payments:
1. Approval of payment of annual dues to the
American Public Power Association in the
amount of $90246.36,
01 Contracts:
11 Approval of contract with Jerry Fredricks
for construction management during the
renovation of the west wing of the M nicipaI
Building (formerly the Police section .
2. Approval of a contract with RESOURCES, Inc,
for purchase of Customer Service training
program.
I I
(City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 11 198J
Page Three
31 Approval of a contract for $15,000 with
Priority Systems+ Inc, to provide
programming support to the Cityy of Denton on
an as needed basis primarily in the area of
systems programming but not limited to this
area,
4. Approval of a contract with TRES Corporation
to provide programming support to the City
of Dpayrol l/PorsonnelQeSestem Sknown ase IEIS~
and the Utility Billing System known as
"CIS",
61 Approval of dispositioc of excess Carroll Boulevard
strreets~f (pa33)be(ThenPlanning PandrZoningdCommilgssion
recommends approval,)
61 Approval of disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard
right of way at the southeast corner of West Prairie
and Carroll Boulevard. (D-36) (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
7. Public Hearings:
A, oTfhisapproximatelly 36866ngacres o ofid landnnlocated
along the south side of Hickory Creek Road
beginning at FM 2181. (Z-1609) (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
B, This is a public hearing to consider annexation
of approximately 1014.4 acres of land located
south of Highway 380 and west of Interstate 36,
(Z-1610) (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
C. ofi approximately c43e9racrres to consider oland elocated awest
of the Interstate 36 W service road and south of
the existing city limit, (Z-1611) (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
D. This is a public hearing to consider annexation
of approximately 367 acres of land located
between I-3b W and the Santa Fe Railroad,
(Z-1612) (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
r
i
V ty of Denton City Council Agenda
November 1, 1983
Page Four
C, Thi; is a public hearing to consider annexation
of approximately 1126 a(Pts of land located on
both sides of Mayhill Road north of Interst to
36, (X-1613) {The Planning and Xon~n9
Commission recommends approval,)
8, Ordinances;
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
new user fee rates in the areas of building fees,
weed cutting, Library, Parks and Recreation,
Public Works, barricade inspections, fire
zoningtifees. servi Animal pContro9, aand
nd
Police services in the City of Denton,
B, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for Public Hearings concerning the
proposed annexation of appproximately 176 acres of
and beginning at a pint in the present City
l
imits lying 360 feet north of and perpendicular
to the centrine of U, S 38nd
approximatelye31600 feet east ,ofHthewatermiination
of the Denton city limit on U, S. Highway 380
east.
91 Resolution3s
A. Consider resolution of formal approval of the
City of Denton industrial /commercial pretreatment
program.
10, Consider approval of a wastewater services agreement
with Ben Pinnell and Buddy King. (The Public Utility
Board recommends approval,)
11. Receive a report on 200 Daniel Street drainage,
124 Consider approval of the name Briercliff for a new
City park,
13, Discussion of designating one-way frontage roads on
TN-35 from U, S, 77 north to the City limit line,
14, Consider approval of a Change Order for drainage
improvements for the Bell-Coronado system,
16, Consider approval of casting voting entitlement in the
election for Board of Directors for the Denton County
Appraisal District,
{4
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 1, 1983
Page Five
16, Discussion of open container laws,
17, Official Action on Executive Session Itemsi
A. Legal flatters
8, Real Estate
C. Personnel
U. Board Appointments
18, New Business;
rhIs item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest new items of business for future agendas,
e
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the dad! of 1983 at
o'clock (a.m, (p,m,)
CITY SECRETARY
1068C
r.
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL.
November 1, 1983
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
November It 1983s at 6130 p,m, in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal building at which the following atoms will be
considered:
6130 p.m,
11 Discussion of now user foe rates in City of Denton,
2. Executive Sessions
A, Legal Matters Under Soc. 2(eArt. 6262.17
V. A, T, S,
84 Real Estate Under Sec. 2(fArt, 6262-17
V, A, T, S,
C, Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6262-17 V,A,T,S.
U. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6262-17 V. A. T, S.
Rogular Meeting of the City of Uen ton City Council on Tuesday,
November 114 19830 at 7s 00 p,m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items w111 be
considerods
7:00 p.m,
1, Presentation of a retirement plaque to Mr, Dickey
Charles of the Denton Fire Department for 2U years of
service,
21 Presentation of the Sesquicentennial flag to the City
of Denton.
3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
October 181 1983,
4. Consent Agendas
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. Bid 0 9196 - Filt,sr Bed Media
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 1, 198;1
Pago Two
2. Bid N 9197 - Elevating Scraper
31 Bid N 9198 , Dictating equipment
4. Purchase Order # 69678 to T,R,A,K,S,
61 Purchase Order N 60008 to Herb's Body 511op
6, Purchase Orders N 60284, 60436 and 60436 all
to IBM
B, Plats and Replats:
i, Approval of the )rellminary replat of the
Mesquite Ridge Townhouse Addition, (The
Planning and [oning Commission recommends
approval,)
2, Approval of the final replat of lots 3, 41
CoAddition,
(The6 anart of and s 2Zoning Mercer
mmission
recommends approval,)
3. Approval of the final replat of lot 26
,
Denton Shopping Center Addition, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
4, Approval of the final replat of the Reding
Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
C, Payments;
1. Approval of payment of annual dues to the
American Public Power Association in the
amount of $9,246,36,
0. Contracts;
11 Approval of contract with Jerry Fredricks
for construction management during the
renovation of the west wing of the M nicipal
Building (formerly the Police section .
2. Approval of a contract with RESOURCES, Inc,
for purchase of Customer Service training
program.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
November 1, 1983
Page Three '
31 Approval of a contract for $16,000 with
Priority systems, Inc, to provide
anoasanneededsupport
s primarilyitin Of earea of
systems programming but not limited to this
area,
4, Approval of a contract with TRBS corporation
to provide programming support to the City
of Denton on an as needed basis in the area
and P he known
known as
"cis",
61 Approval of disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard
r
Steets, (D-33) be(ThenPlaWest nningPandrZoningdCommission
recommends approval,)
6, Approval of disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard
right of way at the southeast corner of West Prairie
and Carroll Boulevard, (0-36) (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
7, Public Hearings;
A. ofisapproximateliy 36.66ngacres o ofidlandnnlocated
along the south side oi' Hickory Creek Road
beginning at FM 2181. (2-1609) (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
B. This is a public hearing to consider annexation
of approximately IU14.4 acres of land located
south of Highway 3U0 and west of Interstate 36,
(Z-1610) (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
C. This i:, a public hearing to consider annexation
of approximately 43.9 acres of land located west
of the Interstate 36 W service road and south of
the existing city limit, (Z-1611) (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
D. This is a public hearing to consider annexation
of approximately 367 acres of land located
between I-36 W and the Santa Fe Railroad.
(Z-16)2) (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
s
City of Denton
City Council Age+taa
November 1 983
Wage Four
E, This is a public tearing
of approximatel to consider annexation
y 1126 acres of l and located on
both sides of 14ayhill o Road north of Interstate
Co ssi(on lrecommendsThapprovlaln1n)i ng and zoning
81 Ordinances;
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing
newd c user fee rates in the areas of building fees,
Public ut tiny, Library, Parks and Recreation,
Works, barricade inspections, fire
inspections, ambulance service, platting and
Police servicesiIn therCity'ofADe°ntonControl, and
8, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date,
time and place for Public Hearinos concerning the
ruposed annexation of lapproximatel y
and beginning at a point in the 1e acres of
limits lying 360 feet north of and present City
to the centerline of U, S, Highwaype380c~~and
approximately 3600 feet east of the termination
of the Denton city limit on U. S, Highway 380
east,
94 Resolutions;
A, Consider resolution of formal approval of the
City of Denton industrial /commercial pretreatment
program.
10, Consider approval of a wastewater services agreement
with Bon Pinnell and Buddy King, (The Public Utility
Board recommends approval,)
11. Receive a report on 200 Daniel Street drainage,
12, Consider approval of the name Briercliff for a new
City park.
13, Discussion of designating one-way frontage roads on
IN-36 from U. S. 77 north to the City limit line.
14, Consider approval of
improvements for the Bell-Coronado system,for drainage
l5. Consider approval of casting voting entitlement in the
elp,ction for Board of Directors for the Denton County
Appraisal District,
City of Denton
November 1, 198301ty council Agenda
page Five
16, Discussion of open container laws.
179 '
Official Action on Executive Session ltomsi
A, Legal Matters
B, Real Estate
C, Personnel
D, Board Appointments
18, New Business;
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest new items of business for future agendas,
CERTI____
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the - , day bf
o'clock 1983 at
(a.m,) fp,m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1D68C
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORAND UI4
M Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM; Charlotte Allen, City Secretary
UATEi October 27, 1983
SUBJECT; Back-Up Materials for Item #3
A reduced copy of the Minutes will be forwarded to you prior to
the Council meeting on Tuesday night,
Thank you,
1
e on
ca
1077C
,
CITY COUNCIL. MINUTRS
October 18, 1983
The Counoil convened into the Work Session at Sr30 p,m, to rooetve a
audio etorepo~rt oil t theVemanagement r letter, And ahereporta on the
results of the apeoial studies,
FRKSOTr Mayor Fro Tom Riddlespergerl Council Members Alford,
Chew, Mopkins and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney, and City Secretary
A8SKNTr Mayor Stewart was attending a oonforenco out of town,
Counoil Member Barton was ill,
Mr, Bill Dillon, Mr, Dick Kreutzfeldt, and Mr, Wilber Smith of
Arthur Andersen ware present,
discu sedor~ includinguthenstatus ofptheaeuditt the manageament letter
and the results of the special studies which had been conducted,
The audit
completed, wNo gad hadhbeen encountegrednand rolpoperatton tfrom
the City staff had been excellent. The management letter comments
were being developed and a draft of the financial statements had
been completed and was currently being reviewed b management,
requi wxantse and being rclassiification m And restatement of ormands
a
mounts were being implemented, Major Issues were the disolosureof
bank
which should sincreas-9 asset s anddenetthin omeito£izutiilities wi,thr®no
v
effect acationnleave,flArthurd Andersen o suggesCd tthat_thislbe implemented
this year, The final audit report would be presented to the Council
on December 20,
Mr, Dick Kreutzfeldt repported that no material weaknesses or
significant problems had been noted during the pr oration of the
mansgement lettar, The letter incorporated items from the special
studies which had been completed but there ,rare no me or issues
other than those which had been covered by the studies, Host of the
prior year recommendations had been implemented, Copies of the
management letter would be sent to the Counoil, r, H cottgletedgso Car, hg s waastvery impresseduwithtthe professionalismeof
Arthur Andersen,
Mr, Kreutzfeldt reported on the results of the special studies wt,ieh
had been conducted. A review of the Finance Department had been
completed using the approach of Interviews with department personnel
and a time analysis. The prime concern was the lack of timeliness
in oompluting monthly closings and providing information to other
departments, The causas for these concerns were systems issues,
procedural matters and department staffing. The procedural problems
were attributed to a lack of closing procedures formal
documentation, en excess of manual checking of information prior to
rutting into the computer, delays in receiving information from
other deppartments and many functions being manually performed, Mr,
whentinformationeshoulddbe given ton the EinencezDepartmenteand when
the Finance Department should give information out,
recommended that the staff should rely in standard comFurthe, it was
putorrcontrols
basis erather thani A u1001r heck mof fal all on do
It was suggg sted
Finance a Departmentland ethose Botherddepartmentsr submittingtinput,thA
mechanization n conshould sidered be for n as many aofatheseafunctions asopossible.
i
City Council Minutes
'fasting of October 18, 1983
Page Two
Mr, Kroutafaldc then addresaed the issue of staffing statings that a
comparison had been oompletod of other olties of ooa~arabl0 size,
The City of Denton lifts 9 1/2 staff members in the Finanoe Department
while other cities have between 9 to 14, The time analysis which
had been completed in the department vgrlfied that too much time was
spent on checking input and manual functions with several people
performing the same data entry function, Arthur Anderson
rocommandod to reduce time oons min manual functions by
mechanization and to combine certain tunofions, The City orsonna
Department was completing an analysis of the department to see what
staffing revisions would be appropriate,
yr. Krauczfeldt also reported on systems planning stating that there
was a pa lack of a lanning coordinate uctedtbys IPWM'aWnning1978oAnd
the current needs were not the same, The red mmendation was to
perform a current analysis of departmental needs, Also chore was
limited or no use of the report writer capability of the computer,
The result was that reports that were generated did not antic
Ql
meet the user needs and too ouch time was being spent working with
existing reports, Arthur Andersen recommended an evaluation of the
n od for reports which could be generated by the report writer as
w~11 as an evaluation of training needs, There also was a lack of
automated software interfacial however, this was not a priority
issue at this time as it only required approximately 20 hours per
month to accomplish manually and would require a major conversion
effort,
Mr, Kreutzfaldt also reported that the absence of a Finance Direotor
and Assistant Finance Director for an extended period of time would
negatively impact the productivity of the department. Staff meeting
should he held in the department and with other department to keep
dommunioations open. The work and storage areas in the Finance
Department were very limited and this sometimes caused morale
problems,
City Manager Hartung stated that the Personnel Department had
completed the comparison of organizational plans of other cities of
comparable size, These cities included Bryan and Garland. The
proposed reorganization of the Finance Department would 'nave the
Finance Direotor reporting to the City Manager, the Assistant
Finance Director reporting to the Finance Director, the Senior
Accountant and Senior Accounting Clerk reporting to the Assistant
Finance Director, All accountants would report to the Senior
Accountant and all accounting clerks would report to the Senior
kooounting Clark,
Kreutzfeldt reported on the special studies stating that in the area
of fixed assets, the City does not have detailed accounting reoords
for fixed assets which represent 701 of the total assets, The
recommendation wag to perform an inventory and determine/satimgto
the cost of the assets, to establish an accounting system Por
rocorditig assets, to consider establishing a property accounting
system to process utility work orders and to establish procedures
for updating records,
Mr. Kreutzfeldt than reported on the issues relating to the required
reporting under PURPA (Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978). These reporting requirements apply to all electric utilities
with annual sofas of over 500,000,000 kilowatt hours with the
biennial filing due June 30 of each subsequent year. The general
ledger accounts are not in sufficient detail at present to meet the
requirements of PURPA reporting, In order to avoid noncompliance
with the requirements, the recommendation made was to supply the
information for 1984 and to request an exemption and/or an extension
ftr 1983. Also recommended was to development the information which
would be required to meet the requirements by developing fixed asset
records and to revise the chart of accounts.
City Council Minutes
Touting of Ootobor 18, 1983
Page Three
Another problom which was addressed was the look nted
polielus and procedures for the Motor pool Fund, Mro.f Kdocooume4ment
useroddoportmencsoland stileldresponsibilityd ford the mfundatahould she
assigned to one individual,
'C
ho last issue reported on was the development of yearend closing
entries
completingnthepclosing proceduresrdo umentationwand timotab..i. The
IOcumentatlon was completed on routine closing entries and the
nonroutine ontrtea procedures were in process,
it was the aonseneua of the Council to continue Navin the entire
Council present for kuture presentations from the auditor a.
Tho Council convened into the Ueoutive Session to discuss legal
matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments, No
offiaf.al action was taken,
The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7100 p.m. in
the Council Chambers,
PRESENTI Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger; Council Members Alford,
Chew, Hopkins and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney, and City Secretary
ABSENTI Mayor Stewart was attending a conference out of town.
Council Member Barton was ill.
1. The Council considered app royal of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of Se tember 20, 1983; the Special Called Meeting of
September 27, 1983; the Regular Meeting of Ootobar 4, 1983, and the
Speolal Called Meeting of October 11, 1983,
Hopkins motion, Chew seoond to approve the Minutes as presented,
Motion carried unanimously,
2, The Council considered awarding bids for the commercial and
residential solid waste systems for the City of Denton.
item W8) (Agenda
Hopkins motion, Chew second to not consider awarding bids for
oommareial and residential solid waste systems and to reject the
bids,
Council Members Stephens asked if this was to kill or postpone the
awarding of the bids,
Council Member Hopkins replied his motion was to kill the award and
reject the bills, Motion carried unanimously,
3. Consent Agenda
The following Consent Agenda was presentedl
A. Purchase Orderal
1. Purchase Order # 60289 to Raoal-Milgo Information
Systems for $3,024.00
2. Purchase Order d 60291 to Hewlett-Paokard for
117,632,00
3, Purchase Order N 60295 to Decision Data Computer
Corporation
City Council Minute
Mooting of October N, 1983
F'ugo Pbut•
4. Purchaso Order 4 60334 to Anooom~ Micro• graphics
for 38,000.0S0
5. urchsso Order V 60350 to Xerox Corporation for
9,000,00
6, Purchase Order 0 60383 to Day Chemical and Supply
for $74684,30
Platsi
14 Approval of the preliminary p1aC and final site
plan of the Allan Estates Mobile Home Park
Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
racommonda approval )
2. Approval of the preliminary plat of late 1 and 2
block t Lodge Croak Addition, (The planning and
zoning Glommission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of the preliminary Slat of The Mad4wa
Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Comm ~asian
recommends approval,)
4, Approval of the preliminary plat of Northridge
Subdivision, (The Planning and Zoning commission
recommonds approval.)
5, Approval of the pprali~q inary plat of Woodhill
Apartments Additiod, (The Planning and Zon ng
Commission recommends approval.)
~6, Approval of the preliminary plafi of lot 11 Oodi
Enterprises. Limited Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
C. Payments)
1, Approval of payment of a tax refund.
2. Approval of Payment of the City of Denton annual
dues to the North Central Texas Council of
Governments,
3. Approval of payment of Lhe City of Denton annual
dues to the Texas Municipal League,
D. Centraotsi
1, Approval of a contract with Denton County Friends
of the Family in the amount of $25,000 to provide
emergency s eltar and counseling to women and
their children, who are victims of family
v
rape ad iolencei to provide counseling to victims of
services familioal and
education their
concerningo rapeidando fa~mily
violence. (The Human Resources committee
recommends approval.)
2. Approval of a contract with Services Program for
Aging Needs in the amount of $23,000 to provide
transportation, hot meals, and information and
referral services to persons sixty years or
older. (The Human Resources Committee recommends
approval.)
3. Approval of a contract with dervices Program for
Aging Needs in the amount of $12,000 to provide
Clt Council Minute
-11aa~ingg of 0atobai N, 1983
Page Five
trans orotant, ion co qual
of Mant ified handicapped oit send r (The HHuman Resources Committee
evommanda approval,)
40 Approval of a oontravt with Fred Moore Child Care
care erforn low income eamilieay00 information and
ChildvenlsandifamIlPraelfteve dayy oare for abused
Human Resources Committee r ce omm nds approval,)
S, Approval of a contract with Retired Senior
offer Volunteer Program in the amount of $3,000 to
(60) yearssrtOfit080 orr oldearedo parsons sixty
esources
Committee recommendaa approval(jha Human RVolunteer
6, Approval of a contract with Denton City•County
Day Nursery in the amount of $7,000 to provide
low cost doY care to low income families where
both parentis work. (The Human Resources
Committee recommanda approval,)
7, Approval of a oontravt for professional serviaes
in the renovation of the west „ ng of the
Munioipal Building (former Police section),
8. Approval of contracts with youth sports
associations,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked chat Item 08 be removed from the
Consent Agenda,
Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda with the
exception of Item 08, Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that some controversy had arisen
over the use of the playing fields. Apparentlyy under the present
situation, the City turned over to the pllaying fields the scheduling
of all events on the fields, This ruled out such gros as the Y•KFA 80 out,HaRiddlespergerlask dowhatrwaspthe properawaynduupp
fields and how had it bean done,
tohsenedulelthe
Assistant City Manager McKean responded that the scheduling was done
uet the wayy it was in all of the other associationa, which we& thet
he asdealationa did their own scheduling, The issue with the Y had
been that they were categorized as a non-profit organization.
Through the sports associationa the City provides the playin space
for groups that are sponsored ~y the associations and the City of
Denton. The City did not provide any space per ad for any
non-profit group, Jane Malone, President of the Soccer Association
and member of the Parks Board, had attempted to work with the Y to
work them into the field schedule, The schedule for the fall was
already set. The contracts on the agenda only provided for funds
for officials and did not have anything to do with authoriq for the
scheduling. The staff recognized the concern and the Park oard was
wouldnlg be bringing to the ximaster thplan to a theoCouncil in theanextofew
months which would address the issue of expansion. First priority
now was being given to those groups sponsored by the City and the
sporCa asaooiatiun, which was open to everyone. The problem was
that the Y charged Chair membership,
Riddlesperger motion, Stephens second to approve Item A8 of the
Consent Agenda, Motion carried unanimously.
' City counotl Minutes
Meel:ingg of October 18, 1983
Pagc Six
4 Appearance by Mr, Richard Walters vogarding it dvainase
ditch,
~1r, Walters stated that he lived at 200 Daniel There was a
drainage ditch running from the Acme Brtok Company prop arty through
his yard. The ditch was plugged up with mud and when It rains, the
water comca up in his yard and Into hl house, Mr. Walters than
stated that lie was appearing befora the ~ounoil to got some t e or
voso:ution to he problem whether the City or Acmo Brick was
responsible,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlasperger stated that the Council would Lnatruot
the Staff to provide them with Information,
Assistant City Manager Svehla reported the property did have a ditch
across Lt. 'Ilia City does not hays drainage easement in this area.
There are settling tanks at Acme brick chat do overflow during heavy
rains, Howard Martin of the City Laboratory had checked these tanks
and found that they cohtaLned only clay par )alas and do not contain
any pollutants,
Mr. Walters stated that the vator flow was oontinuoys and had been
for several years, H1$ atto nay had adyis d him that when water ran
through property continuously for a number of years, it was a
natural ease aMt, The rail di.~ oar8a the sett11 tanks to overflow
but. the dttc ran water a l t e time and shout be tied Into the
City's sewer system,
Council Member Chew asked Mr, Walters if he would be willing to give
this as an casement to the City,
Mv. Walters responded that he would but the City Engineer had
informed him that he would have to bring the ditch up to standards,
Assistant City Manager Svehla stated that the water crosses other
property also and all parties involved would have to give the City
easements In order for Cho City to maintain the ditch. If the level
of the ditch were lowors6i the water would stand in osrtaiq sppka,
The water from the settling tanks and/or from rainfall would follow
the lay of the land, The City Attorney would' need to issue an
opinion on whether Acme Brick had the authority to release this
water continuously,
Cityy Attorney Taylor susgested that further foots would need to be
&atltorod and report book before any recommendations scold be made,
The oonsenaus of the Council was to have the City Attorney gather
information and report at the November I Council meeting.
5. Public Hearings)
A, The Council considered the petition of Brian Burke
represeppring Joe. Jeter requestingg a change in zoning from agrioul-
tural (A) to the planned developmant (PD) classification on an
approximately 18.8 acre parcel located adjacent and east of Old
North Road (also called Mockingbird) and approximately 490 feet
north of Audra Lane, If approved, the planned development (PD)
would permit the following)
Single Family Detached - on 14.0 acres
(minimum lot size, 61400 square feet)
Street Right-of-Way - on 4.8 acres z-1606
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing,
Mr. Brian Burke, oonaulting civil engineer, spoke in favor of the
petition stating that the owners were requesting the zoning be
changed to the planned development that would permit no more than 86
Lots to be built on the property, The petitioners wanted to meet
City Counoil minutes
Fleotirlg of October 18, 1983
P4I90 Seven
all of the City requirements and standards for SF-7 housing, The
development would be III single family detached housing,
Council Member Hopkins asked if this was near the flood plain area,
Mr, Burke stated that no part of the subdivision would fall in the
flood plain.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor Pro Tom closed Clio public hearing,
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that 18 reply
forms had been mailed with 4 returned In favor and l in opposition
Uavelopme pntaOuidanpolt yoandawaeioln anasarea nwhorenthewCounoilnhad
approved 61000 to 6,300 square foot lots. With the development gin
unndevelpedoareao was h situated to thebnorlm of rthlisharea, The staff
would watch future development to the north with an eye to traffic
access, The planning and Zoning Commission felt that the concerns
of the area property ownora who replied may have ooma from some
reatstanue to growth, The P&Z hed recommended approval with 4
conditions, This petition was in 'a quadrant of the City where there
had been a considerable amount of ow to moderate income housing
0 developments, The Development Guide does not desiahato any quadrant
as an area where this type of low to moderate sousing should be
developmentd u
commnity ethato theiCity nwould ICike boo eseat balanoeo
growth,
approving a 0h1angs Tto aoninggil fro a egri ultural i (A) o to ache rp lanned
development (PD) olasaifLcation on an approximately 18.8 gore parcel
MookingbirifY one approximately 430 Eeet north of Audra Lanes called
The following ordinance was presented)
No, 83.119
TEXAS ORDINANCE SAME AMENDING ADOPTEDZONING AN APPENDIXE TO CITY THEP CODE DENTON
6ORDIN4NCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NOS
OF-IL'AND OUTS OFITHE R. B, LON06040 SURVEY,, ABSTRACTCNO, MORE HE77R5AINDENT AND ECLAR610 AANN E, ° OTIVE DATE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
Hopkins motion, Chew second t(. adopt the ordinance with the
conditions as stated yyby the Planning and Zoninl; Commislion, On roll)
andlMayor Pro Toms Kidd lesperger'aye". Motion carriedeuna in mo slye
B. The Council considered the petition of Barry Wachal
eoqueating a change in zoning from two-family (2-F) to the sieggla
f mily (Sp-7) classification on lots 1, 2, 3, 41 19, 20, 21 and 22,
brook 1, North Lake Parks Addition, The property is located
ad scent and west of th pro eetad extension of Pa kalda Drive at a
point beginning approx~mate ~y 824 feet south of Bowling Oreen.
Z-1608
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing.
Mr. Barry Wachal, developer, spoke in favor of the petition stating
that when the pproperty was purchased it had been zoned for
developers noww )Wigged to haves the werezodniuplexe
changged to aSF'era so that
single family detached dwellings could be built inatead of duplea~es.
City Council Mini is
Floatingg of Octob,, 18, 1983
Pago Eight
No, ono spoke in opposition to the petition.
The Mayor Fro Tsui closod the public hearing,
David EllLson, Development Review Planner, stated that 2 reply forma
had been availed with 0 returned, The staff had nothing to add to
Mr, wachal a presentation. cons approvtnA change in zoning! f om itwo-faa ly (24) f tonghe ds1n le
family (IF- 7) olassification on lots 11 2, 3) 4, 19, 20, 21 and,
block to North Lake Parks Addition,
'rho following ordinance was prosentedi
N0. 83.120
Vk XAS BIAS SAMEAMENDING ADOPTED ASN AN~APPENDITHE X TOInTHEF CODE OOF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO,
21 AND 22 AS LSAID OCK MlP APPLIES A~DITiot~ IDhTON
DECLARINGANSdFFECTIVE DATE TICULARIY DESCRIBED HER N; AND oo. voteh HopkinsiJ a'yeY'10 Stephen tpjYedop Alfordo~'aye, , chow n"Aye', °and
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespargor aye lotion carried unanimously. C. The annexation of approximately 3hold 5166 acres public land hearing along consider
south side of Hickory Creek Road beginning at FM 4181. (Z•1609)
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor,
Mr -
HLokory CrookaRoadtend 1Qesaley Lana, tat tednthat fistdid pof know whyf
the CLCy Council would annex more then half of their 20 acres at
this corner, He stated that he assumed that someone on the other
side wanted City services. The annexation would take a huge swath
out of the propertyy, Mr. Meredith alao stated that his home had
been in the City Ilmits for 10 years and did not receive any City
services and did not want to pay taxes on another piece of property
which did not receive water and sewer service and minimal police
protection, Mr, Meredith pr osed a counter plan of taking a
utility easement along Hickory Crook Road.
spokespersons steate'd that atheinassocia ion owas oagainst8allatofn the
annexations on the Council agenda, The Board of Directors of the
assooiation had sent Mr. Hammett as spokesperson to state their
reasons for opposing Chase annexations. Research had been done on
the Hammettasreported the9Al creases rendered
monthly between
aver t0 of and 1983,
mileage, average calls for service, custody or non-trai`fic arrests,
felony offenses reported, accidents, and traffic citations issued.
Mr. Hammett then reported that in 1981 there were 44 sworn patrol
officers, In 1982 the police Department requested 12 officers and
had 6 approved with 2 funded. An Additional 4 officers would be
added ±.n April of the following yearl however, these were postponed
and not added until 1982-8.3. This year the Police Department had
requested an additional 4 officers and 2 were approved. From 1981
t,o 1983 there had been an increase of 4 patrol officers with no
increase in the amount of criminal investigation officers to do
follow-ups on criminal activity. With the increases In building
permits for apartments, the addition of three mobile home parks with
CityY Counatl 1i nuCoa
MOOCingg of October 18, 1983
Page Nine
facillties for 900 motile homes, nd the additional 7991 acres which
have boon annexed si!toe August o 1981, the Police Aaaooiation did
Wfuel that they could adequately 000troi the City with the number
o Mears which are pre3e0Cly on the for0e given the rapid growth
of Denton.
Council Membor Stephens asked Mr Hammett if he was a sworn officer
of the Denton Police Department.
Mr, Hammett responded that he was but he was speaking as a member of
the Police Aasoclation,
Mr, Dick Foster, adjoining property owner, sugggested that the
traffic pattern on Teasley Lana should be investigated before the
City conoldered any development in this proposed annexation area,
Mr, Foster stated that he believed that an development could be
controlled under the City s extra territorial jurisdiction, Mr,
Foster also stated that he had no knowledge of what was proposed for
this area,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesppergger responded that the City was aware of the
traffic problems on Teasley Lane but that housing would be built in
this area whether It was in the City limits or not,
The Mayor Pro Tam closed the public hearing.
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, stated that 4 of the annexations on
the agenda were a result of a staff studyy of areas which it was felt
had a high growth potential, This par oulor annexation had been
initiated in accordance with the City Council's annexation policy,
Whenever a development was proposed in the City's extra territorial
jurisdiction which was essontially more than 5 lots, It may have a
significant Impact on the City. The parcel which is requested for
annexation is 35 acres in size baginning at the oorgar of Hiokor
Creek Road and Teasley Lane, This was essentially a S00 foot strI~
which goes westward to a 17 acre parcel where a 32 lot subdivision
is proposed, If this development is not annexed, the developer can
build the internal street system to County standards which are
essentially gravel roads with bar ditches, 'rho developer planned to
install a well system for water distribution and septic systems for
sewer disposal. The concern of the City was that the experience had
been that over time the water and/or sewer systems malfunction and
the nearest local government Is requested to resolve the problem
which would be a cost to all taxpayers, If annexed, the street
system would be built to City standards which would mean a curb and
gutterad street and the Infrastructure would have to be of a higher
quality than if left in the s,:tra territorial jurisdioation. In the
annexation process the Council can take no action on this Itse and
can hold another public hearing on November 1, or could disooneinue
the annexation proceedings or reduce the size of the area to be
annexed. The reason the piece of land which adjoins the subdivision
and goes to Teasley Lane is 500 feet in width Is to meet state
statute requirements for annexation,
Mayor Pro Tem Riddlegperger stated that this was essentially a
defensive move on the part of the City to avoid being surrounding by
septic systems and well water distribution systems.
City Manager Hartung commented that he wag extremely disappointed
that a group of individuals who claim to be speaking for a group of
City employees would take a somewhat self-serving attitude about an
issue thin lmportantl particularly when In the very near future, the
Police Department would be moving into a new facility on which the
people of the community had spent ver a million dollars, There was
no question that the City Council had given the highest priority
that they could to providing police and fire Protection to people in
the community within the ability of the citizens to pay, it was
easy to say that since not all of the positions requested had been
unded, a fence should be built around the community. The Council
had added positions as could be financed. Not annexing these areas
5 ~
City Counoll Minutee
hleottng of Octohor 18, 1983
Pago Ton
would not stop growth, the aonatruotix of mobile home parks, or the
development of these areas, kventually these Areas would be ip the
city of Denton, It is in the long term best Interest or the
community to have a program of annexation which was not based on
knoo~Jerk re~Iaction to development which ocuured in the extra
manleroandl therionlytway thhceth#syaould erow ssured ww9owitlllChaeee
areas within the Cl,ty limits, the City of Denton could not control
land uses outside of its City limits, Every departwont in the City
organization Weis having to stretch because of the period of
ox tremoI vapid growth which Denton was experianoing, Hartung
stated City was talking about +t program which woulld attempt to
yring some order to the development which was oocurrlng on the
fringe of the City,
annexacioV. The
of apprxiuebely 1014,4y acres Public e and hearing to
south of
Il+,ghway 380 and west of Interstate 35, (2.1610
The Mayor Pro Tam opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor, n Do tlhatJhe didncaster of why Selwyn in s oposition
make any difference as the annexation
was virtually wholly rural With no
development on it at the present time,
Mr, John Bradford spoke in opposition stating that this annexation
towardydevelopmentrinBrhisoarea. St atementsehad been me thatvthe
City had no control over development unless an area wad in the
City. This did not take into account the City's extra territorial
extradterritorialijjurisdicti,aheywouldtlhavertotbulldy sC eets tto
they next standars
hearingnhebwouldClioyyn krpto !hear whatgthefCitystwould tdotfor
w
oulditheecitize nsigot curbhandarea utter streets, extra If go, unlessait
was
have aseweroorhwater problems,beMrBeBtudfordpstated that heelived 300
thetcostmOf toppingryinroy thesysowerlilina"nd ®eociiti:ens weredtold
they would have better streets, better electric service, watorA
sower and police proteocion would be made available to Chem,
The y land s inh been rtin
area w'+ich uwas the are
rece tly parallel had not seen iany
improvements,
The Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing,
mailedy andt0iwere Senior returned. This area r was exporienoiq and would be
desireyto annexe just significant itorthee occupiranoea oifnmajorturbanization,
if the annexation decision was made too late many undesirable land
approximatelyaft000tacres uin benplace. ~recommendationlcfordthe
annexation of the four areas which were before the Council, The one
thing that all four areas had in common was the Hickory Croak 9awor
territorial juwas a risdictioniallows the City onlyeapproval of plats. 11
the area becomes urbanized in the future and is then taken into the
City, all of the taxpayers would have to pay the cost of upgrading
the existing infrastructure. The staff felt that this particular
parcel was of epeoial significance as it was located just West of
MunicipaleAirportwand wasaalready served byyproximity
rail. Theo Hicthe kory Dentor,
sewer line was in place, a 16 inch water line was in place near the
City Council Minutes
Meeting of October 18, 1983
page Eleven
airport and other capital Improvements were proposed for this area
during the next 4 years, This area was also a major a loyment
cantor in the City.. Future roads would be required and if khe area
were In the City limits, developer participation would be required.
Mayor Pro Tam RLddlesperger stated that the City had to plan for the
future.
Council Member Stephens asked why Mr. Bradford had not been sent a
notification of the annexation,
oftproperty oond wnershwash t kealdfromcthentaxthrollssatonthetAppraisal
District,
City Manager Hartung responded to Mr. Bradford's statement ragarding
the City's placement ofpower lines next to existing TP&L lines,
Hartung stated that this line was extended to the airport substation
serve the area, it was not thehpracticeaof itsheoCityiofaDenton to
jcquire the facilities of any electric utility In an annexed area,
Council Member Hopkins stated that if the area were annexed, the
residents could stay'on TP&L or transfer, to the City if they wished,
annexation of approximately 4319 acres public iland hearing to consider
terstate 35 W service road and south of the existing city limit,
Z. 1 611)
(n
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing,
Mr. L, A. Nelson, representing Jim Mason the owner of the property,
strongly south favor nadof the jacent annexation
to exthe c City Limits a and hesoarea was
uth and
adjacent to property which was resently utilized as light
industrial property. In the near fupture, this property would also
be used for light industrial purposes, If annexed now, the future
developers would not have to wait for annexation and rezoning, Mr.
Nelson also urged the staff to consider annexation of an additional
40 acres to the south. If the entire parcel were annexed, pressure
could then be brought to bear on the State to expand, extend, and
maintain the service road on Interstate 35,
Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council and staff recognized
that this particular area was a prime location for light industrial
egpaad itioeal 4QuRl ecread that the staff look into the annexation of
No one spoke In opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, stated that the staff had nothing
to add, ,
annexation of approximately held a
acres of bland ocated between heari to consider
and the Santa Fe Railroad, (z-1612)
The Mayor Pro 'rem opened the public hearing,
No one spoke in favor.
Mr, Bill Rogers, developer of the Solar Way Addition, spoke in
opposition stating that the Solar Way Addition was an attempt to
develop an area In low density rural style with ecological and
energy conservation considerations primary, With permission from
the City, the development had used County specifications for larger
4
•
City Council Minutes
Meeting of October 18, 1989
Page Twelve
lot sines to retain the ohaeaoter of the area. If annexed, there
would be no way to develop further according to City .ltandards which
require very small lots due to the economics of the situation.
Council Member Hopkins referred Mr. Rogers to the staff to obtain
information on the new subdiviaton rules and regulations governing
estates subdivisions.
stating that Nelson, Jones r owned n gS 84 acrbat W. es on then extremeknorthorncend of
the tract proposed to be annexed, The acreage is the remainder of a
larger parcel which had been family owned for 40 years, There was
no access to the property 'from interstate 35W. There was no
frontage on Bonnie Brae, There was a 2 acts tract on the east of
the Santa Fe railroad which was already in the C1ty limits, The
tract is on the west side of the Santa Fe and had no aoceas to
Bonnie Drae. The land was currently being used for cattle
ranching, butnathislspropertythwas land
the ibasenawhere Conty nwere
brought before going to market, In summary, Mr. Nelson stated that
incompstiblevwithyurbantlifeOCeThere w the re noeutilltias this
availablewto
the property,
The Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing,
Charlie
A
returned inafavor, rand that 0ineopposition were
plan of service was available for reviow, The thoroughfare plan
showed the southern part of Bonnie Brae to be a mayor thoroughfare,
can t be requestremained obtained from t devalcf era butt the Citydcouldtnot
require developer participation,
Council Member Hopkins requested the staff to look again at the
particular piece of property which Mr. Nelson had referenced.
of land hearing ted on to both consider
annexation of approximately 11hold 25 acres public
of Mayhill Road north of Interstate 95. (Z»1613
The Mayor Pro Tom opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor of the petition.
Ila, Patty Wilson, resident of the area, spoke in opposition stating
that she had received the reply form after the Planning and Zoning
Commission maetin . Ms. Wilson stated that the residents were not
receiving the not ces. Ms. Wilson also questioned whether the City
could offer fire protection to the area. In December a house in the
recently annexed Mayhill area burned and the City Fire Department
referred the call to the Sheriff who notified a volunteer fire
department to respond to the call. Ms. Wilson stated that she knew
the City Police Department was understaffed and overworked annd
questioned whether adequate patrol would be available, In the f 1/2
years she had lived in the area there had been no growth. She did
understand that 9 mobile home parka were proposed. She also stated
that the City dump was 1/2 mile behind her house and she did not
consider this a healty environment in which to raiae children. Mo.
Wilson also stated that, in response to the Issue of County
standards for roads, there were road In the City which were not
curbed and guttered until the r.eaidents requested it, Ms. Wilson
reported that Mr, Frank Martino was developing in the Mayhill area
and had damaged the roads since before school was out last year and
they had not been repaired. An article had appeared in the Sunday
paper regarding the water treatment plant, and Ms. Wilson stated
that she understood that the plant would be too small in five
years. If annexed, the area could be serviced by City sewer. The
newspaper article stated that the sewer plant would be too small in
v
City Council Mlnutos
;looting of October 18, 1983
Pago Thirteen
five years and that if areas already within the City which are not
on City sewer weru serviced, the plant would be too small now.
Mr. Ooorge Kay, resident, stated that the area waa proposed to be
annexed last year but was deleted at the last misrule but their
and®hsince war annexed. xhas doubleilin hsome park
and now has last
seep ln Onto adjacent pro arty. Mr, Kay tated that he has lived in
the scent area and ha~ not seen a police car come down the road
since the area was annexed, Mr. Kay also stated that according to
the was rkLyselectricity, Mr. Kay statedh thatslhenfelt~ he hCity twas not
doing what they had stated that they would when the Mayhill
community was annexed,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that the Council was optimistic
about the City and felt that the City had good water and sewer
systems. The Council and staff were planning ahead for future
development,
Mrs. Mason Haggard spoke in opposition asking why the City annexed
part of the mobile home park and Andrews Corporation instead of
annexing all of it.
City Manager Hartung responded that the entire mobile home park and
Andrews Corporation property had been annexed for several years,
Mrs, Haggard stated that Mr. Watkins had stated that the Henry S,
Miller Company wanted to be annexed but they ware an investment
company and the people who lived there had a lot invested In the
area. 'rho residents would like to be given the same consideration
as the Council gives to Denton residents. The landfill had not be
placed in Southridge. The land had been purchased prior to the
announcement shat this was the la dfill site. Southrid8a did not
want Loop 238 so it had been placed in their community. Mrs.
Haggard asked if annexed, what City services would the City provide,
Ms. Eilene Powell spoke in opposition stating that she owned ¢4
acres of land adjacent to Interstate 35E and asked what the City a
future plans were for the area and what benefit the City could give
to her. Ms, Powell also stated that the acreage would be desirable
for subdivision. A man had told her that the Council had agreed to
let him put a mobile home park on Pockrus Road which was next to the
potential subdivision area.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked if the acreage for the mobile home
park was in the City limits,
Ms. Powell responded that it was not.
Mr, Sob Coonrod spoke in opposition stating that a statement had
been made regardin how proud the City was of the sewer plant, Mr.
Coonrod stated that he lived in oloae proximity to the sewer plant
and that the City shou~d not be so proud of it. Mr, Coonrood stated
that the City should clean up your own backyard before you start
coming out and trying to tell country people how to live".
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespanger responded that the Council wanted
persona a peering to make statements about their attitudes but did
net want eo be attaoked. This hearing was beiug hold on whether or
not to annex the area and the Council was inearasted in hearing why
citizens wore in favor or opposed, If annexed, every protection of
the City would be available.
Mr. Coonrod then asked if the City intended to give the residents
every service that the people in the City of Denton had without the
residents paying for 15 or 20 years before they received it.
City Council Minutes
Meeting of Oetobor 18, 1983
Page Fourtoon
Ms. Jo Loiselle, resident of the area, stated that the area received
aloisedequaltle e personal coverage by the Sheet££ s Department, Ms,
than asked if It were against City ordinances to discharge
thafirearm the land skunks in this oncern among rural area, rMo. Loiselle
l stated
area that
was the
now City rivgto Denton
and the stre"ta wore no
hoped model to to uth on,
way for a while. The resident's had their own garbage picbild
kup
and if annexed they could not burn their brush.
The Mayor Pro Tom closed the public hearing
Mayor Pro T42 Kiddlespergar stated that no member of the Council
wanted to disappoint anybody. The rapid growth on Denton would
happen and the Council was trying to be ready for the future
development.
6. Ordinances
amending Chapter 21ouArticleonllle Section rdopton of the oCode not
Ordinances pertaining to foes for street cuts,
This ordinance had been previously discussed,
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO. 83.121
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21.41 OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE
CODS OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; TO PROVIDE
FOR AN INCREASED FEE FOR EXCAVATION PERMITS; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. t
Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance, On roll call
vot'i Hoso kips "aye", Strphe~ta 11 011 Alford °aye°, Chen 14 11 and aye
Mayor Pe low Riddlesperser aye7. Motion carried unanimously,
B. The Council City consided of Denton construction pcojeotsdinance
setting minimum wages
Council Member Hopkins stated that this item had been discussed
g:viously and that the staff had done an exoe4ant job completing
survey,
The following ordinance was presantedi
NO. 83.122
AN ORDINANCE ASCERTAINING THE GENERAL PP,EVAILINNO RATE OF
TYPEDOFMWORKHMN OR TMECHANIC NEEDEDTTO' EXECUTE OCI TYR P BLIC
WORKS CONTRACTS,
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance.
Council Member Stephens asked if the survey which was made was what
the staff knew to be high and low and the staff tried to strike an
average, Stephens also stated that the staff did not seek out one
or the other, to the bast of their knowledge, on how companies paid,
Assistant City Manager Svehla stated that the staff did not seek out
the high or low we a. Individuals, construction firms, etc. were
sought within the Ctty and as many as possible were surveyed, once
t 9e Information was obtained, t e staff simply took the average of
the high wages in each case a established the rate that way. If
trades, the staffothen "sadl the information which was obtainedlfromt
other citios to indicate the amount of distance or spread between
i
City Council Minutes
Meatingg of October 18, 1983
Page iYfteen
various raises, such as apprentices, journeymon, or master craftsmen
and allocated those in the some relative position.
Council Member Stephens stated that the Council had requested the
staff to conduct this survey and the staff had done that to the best
of their ability.
Oil roll call vote Hopkins "aya", Stephens "a~e", Alford "aye", Chew
aye and
unanimously. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger 'aye". Motion carried
C. The ordinance considering adoption of an ordinance
relating to the termination of the existing gas fuel contracts ynder
the terms of which the City purchases gas for its generating lagnts
transferh agreemgentx and ideclaring onw emergency) was removed nd from the
agenda,
7. The Council considered approval of the preliminar
the L. L. and T, Addition, y plat of
David Ellisoo, Development Review Planner, reported that this item
was on the agenda as a non-oonsent item due to a question conoernin
existin&g structures, ica somae of iwhich encroachedrainto wathrailroad
right -of-way,The petitioner proposed to expand a metal building
located at the front of the lot near where it abutted Dallas Drive.
Jjhnson Street was being used b the ublio but no formal
tho11tstaaff awoulddedication r been so
-ofWary ee dedicatt n8 ated. occurred,
pr,rtioular case, ifqthe ire petition the riehrt dedicated the correct amount of
In this
right-of-way he not onlyy would~t affectq the plans for the expansion
building mat Thebrecommend tionwo thelPlanningaAnd iZoningh Commission
was to obtain as much right-of-way as possible during final platting,
Hopkins motion, Stephens second to approve the preliminary plat.
Motion carried unanimously.
8. The Council considered authorization of an increase in the
nor limit o a ur 8se ROrder d 55497 (Lake Lewisville
V)h) aand
anginarin assistgnag with the F'ederal~Energy Regulatory Commission
for hyoroegeotrio facilities.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that Black and Veatch
had been following the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
activities for hydroelectric projects, The original contract was
for $5,000 and had been increased to $6,000 in ,July. The PERC had
come to the final stages of their activities and were now preparing
would draf be madehby lvarious parties was when the expected daft wasdreleased, Black
and Veatch would have to respond and have estimated that it woulnd
uire approximately 3 days per license at an estimated cost of
0 per day. The staff was recommending an additional $1,000 for
each project which would inoreaas the total project amount to $8,000.
Chew motion Alford second to authorize the increase, Notion
carried unan~moualy.
9. There was no official action on Executive Session items of
legal matters, real estate, personnel, or board appointments.
10, The following items of new business were requested by
Council Membersi
that
held between Council Member City Council H~thei Flow Hospital requested
boarda of eating tors
and the Hospital Administrator to discuss the hospital,
City Counoil Minutes
Meoting of October 18, 1983
Page Sixteen
2, Council Member Chew requested a disoussion on the open
container laws,
With no further business the meeting was adjourned,
1
MARLOTTE
1069C
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING November 1, 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 11 Consent agenda
SUBJECT: Sid 0 9195 Filter Bed Nadia
W,MARYi This bid is for the filter sand, gravel and anthracite
coal necessary to recondition four filter beds at the
Water Production Plant, These beds must be reconditioned
periodically to maintain the efficiency of the system,
ACTION REQUIRM Approval by Council and award of bid,
SOURCE OF FUNDSr 1983-84 budget funds account number 623-008-0450.8301
Water plant, maintenance of building and equipment,
RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification of Boa Sand Company, in the total
amount of $29,812,80 with delivery in 10 days, FOB
Denton, Texas,
The price offered by Maintenance Engineering Company
is lower, however they have bid delivery by rail, The
best possible rail site is not practical for our use and
our bid required truck delivery,
&XHIBITS: Tabulatio gheet,
SUBMITTED BY i
Tom D, Shaw, C,P,M,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
r
r+ M K
~ ~ ~ ~ llJy li
ff „
K
y
n
R
T ~ O r~ N NN IN ~ yL
X N a yaj ~ ~ O O y ~i
y
c ~ j ~ ~ v v .1 z
,o
V
i N V V M
lA N N 9 Y
M M
R V K M
N ,
h ~ ~ N y
R N
V Vy
°t' ~ N ~ WWo yW
N ~ N y tl
~N 1
I yn `'S ~ ref
f IWWN
A' ~ y U b I T 11 A ~ n
i ~ ~ y I(II I Y ~ I~
I
C
Illllllllll
III I
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHUT
DATE OF MEETING, November 1, 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent agenda
SUBJECT: Bid p 9197 Elevating Scraper
SUtMARYt This bid is for the lease purchase of an eleven cubic
yard self loading elevating scraper to replace motor-
pool unit number 2495, This equipment is used in the
sanitary landfill and is critical to our operation and
compliance with State and Federal regulations, The old
unit, a 1978 model, is not in running order and is no
longer economical to maintain and will be traded in on
the new scraper,
our request for bid was fqr a new unit to be financed
via a lease/purchase agreement over a 60 month payout
period. The bid prices reflect the total cost, in-
cluding finance charges, to the City of Denton,
ACTION REQUIRED, Approval by Council and award of W.
SOURCE OF FUNDSt 1983-84 budget funds account number 720-9002 lease/
purchase of motorpool vehicle,
RECOMMENDATION, We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification of Plains Machinery, The tonal
60 month payout price is $110,671,80, They have offered
a trade in price of $19,000,00 for our old unit 2495.
Delivery of the new unit, an International 4128 would
be within 20-45 days or sooner, FOB Denton, Texas,
EXHIBITS, 1 abbulaatio stye et,
SUBMI'T'TED BY t
yt
Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
SlU ~ 9797
BID TITLE Sera
OPENED 10 20 83 Boyd J&S Equip- Trinity Plains Darr Darr
Excavation Machinery (A)
ACCOUNT # 720-3002 (B)
# ITEH DESCRIPTION V AR
VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
VENDOR VENDOR
1- ~ lI cubic yard scraper (purchase
104,980_00 109,953.00 94,480.00 95,103.00
2- 1 Trad-in of old unit 2495
5,000-00 19,000.00 -0- -0-
2A, Outright purchase oz old unit 3,250-00 5,800-00 -0-
3- lease/purchase funded amount
99,980.00 90,953.00 94,480-00 95,103-00
4-`9onthly payment _
2,013.60 1,844.53 1,894.00 11905-00
*5 Total 60 month payout
price
120,780.00 110,671_80 113,640_00 114,300_00
Delivery
30 days 20-45 days 21 days 70 days
* Bid award based on compliaaice with specifics ion and thi dollar amo
z.
00
n w
< m N n
S ~ ~ G M N O
w ~ ~ ~ C n d Q w
ro M ~ e
to ~ Iv
,y n t7' a
qw ~ M
O M tD G W
n ^ Q• O ~ M
~ ro
A ry O G h
~ rt
W v ~ry y
W SC
a
a
0 ro "
O o
a
0 Ln a4
to C) y
a o ~
'O GG
tr O ro W
w b
O O v0 N ~D p 0 H
F., p, V O y1, 401
Qp O
ygH 'C p 4 Cj ,O n
O V' O O
°o
h N r H
O w v O O 10 O
W O
O O N O 00
O
N I
p ° .9s O A w A~yby
~C W co v I I v v M fi
y ~ ~ O co
O
C O 8
~ r ~ w
a b IT+ tp
~ ~ s,~
~s
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: November 11 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 1) Consent Agenda
SUBJECTi Bid 0 9198 Dictating Equipment
SUMMARY1 This bid is for the purchase of dictating equipment
to be used in conjunction with the newly organized
Word Processing Center,
ACTION REQUIREDI Approval by Council and award of bid,
SOURCE OF FUNDSo 1983-84 Budget funds account number 100-003-0006-9103
Word Processing Center, office machines,
RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
of Dictaphone Corporation in the amount of $5,205,44,
Delivery will be in approximately 30-45 days, FOB
Denton.
4EXHIBITSe ~Zabulatio sheet,
SUBMITTED BY t Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
BID 9198
RFD TITLB_ Dictating Equipment
OPENED 10/20183
ACCOM # 100-003-0005-9I03 Sound Comm Lanier Dictaphone
Systems
(Sony)
ITEM DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR
VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1- 2 Dictating Recorder system 4,457-00 2,400.00 1,917-72
2_ 4 Desk top Transcription unit 599-00 400.00 342.50
Manufacturer Sony Lanier
Dictaphone
livery 14 day 7 dayl- #1 30-45day
- # 7-10 day,
i
any a c
C y n o0
+I~oy a ~ a
C n 0 N, O W n
ti b q M
H 7[{C[+07J7 C 00 W
e o
Q NA ~ W
b n
y
H n
W
n
G
v
N
(7 W $ d ~ HM appp M
O O ~
I ~ y
W(w x W td+,
a
g V
h0
1 ~
i I I ~ ~
I~
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
LACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETINCt November 1, 1983
COUNCIL, AGENDA ITEM A Consent agenda
SUBJECTt Purchase crier 59578 to T,R,A,K,S, Service Co,
=*[ARYi This is for the emergency repair of our unit number
7123, Water and Sewer Flushing truck, This Service
was for the repair and reconditioning of this vehicle.
This repair work will make this vehicle a front line
piece of equipment once again rather than a standby
unit,
ACTION RRQUIREDt Apnrcval by council,
SOURCE OF FUNDS1 Budget account number 620-008-04718542,
RECOMMENDATION] We recommend this purchase order to T,R,A,K,S, Service
bps approved for $7,547,00,
EXHIBITS; Copy of invoice numbers 06187 and 06182 and copy of
the puroh a order,
SUBMITTED BY e ' %1sfIGG =_e'~
~J, ~larshall, C,P,M.
Purchasing Agent
,
RDIR NNMOgR 00010
r 216 6, MoKinn/Y
Oonton, Tom 76201 1 r•
8171068'8311 D/FW Wro 267-0042 No mo.
W,O1
N0,
wsttoolt Noi~ VISA*
4 OaIIV/RY ACC7. No.
Tim sarvico-c*-
Iwo a. 'Bata to AQa1d,~ . p,o, rot cm- OF a1NTON
%rviaq, Ts =w 75080 alat ltrliata.
SHOW P.O.NO,ON ALL SHIPMENTS, OELIVFRY TICKETS, INVOICE-S ETC.. SENO-INVOICBS TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, THE CITY CP DENTON, TEXAS.
IE EXEMPT FROM SALES TAX .43 PER HOVSE SILL 020, THS OITY OF OENTON IS PROHIBITED FROM PAYINQ POR MERCHANDISE BEPORE.IT If.
RECEIVED.ALLSHIPMENTSMUST BEPO,Br,CITY Off QENTON,TV,AS. '
ITEM CITY STOOK NUMBER OESCRIPTION' QUAN./UNIT PRICK AMOUNT
Aig 17113
Attooo4iti.ara avA pasia s'ln:th " t"ck lot
c IQs nrT7TrbUC se
. P CAT ~
E
Dimat All Inqulrlea Tot
CI'T'Y OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT,
John J. Marshall, C.P.M., Purchasing Agent
Tom D, Shaw, 0,13.M., Asst. Purchasing Agent
17 pow
PARf
Ale
06187'
Z': 391-7522
- KT-is O ~ -
Address -
Recdmg ~
J x - - -'xC ArD MRl UCEhSE u0. ♦ND RAT[ wgiQ r+0.
N.F r = !o a.,.~e. 71 2 3
- - - - - n+sraUCriOnrs - AMOUrr
oaF El own 0 i . G FM G w + G vaisr+ ❑
a -
- - i - REfA!M t1tfS WR BnsfCCtOlf NSGRD )AM Totot Lvbw O _
, . MY TOW PAM
ago- EPUAM AMom PAIDS A* tUM
_ TOW Pah
~ - - ' ` ~r Gale Ges (c a..~ [w..+. t*rt s-
i. - O - C'm OI. Ore _
oft ar
t ~ Cbs G+ese ~ - _ ~~~~s
7a/al Gai-07-Goose rwa_ Tub"
t; er > . ESTIMATE TOTAL ► Ooridr wwk
VVI p ~PO~ ql b ~ e1e,r
S, F ap^s~ M le." .+d v ..~:[b 1~w~i~ ..,n.u- wd •wbr V'°n .EO aelM ~pr -rybrw. D~'^•M4• b
j A t•.4x«.br ~o~.de.de..de.~ly. b d~•we-.~A«b~~d~~p•d/o- i~q.nc+..h~~..+ . TOTI1
[t~ - bVarR AbtnorizecJ by X Daie Promised -TAX
Dose DCI~ TODAt AMOUM
- r - 7 = Y
r 5
TI 1,_:1,.1 4 r ~'t~s t=a t {I j'n , y VF
45179, .iJl", 1Z4t
'fr. ( 5y~,t`.. e5yaa "'y {f~-,~. jyfy .Nrl , ^ r 1 5
110
to
/1 +J iYiY~ y a ,
r
kkk
r I 1. .H, ~Yr'
diddiddiddip
ITT
'LL ± 't 0 4 C
ti I'd TF
jy y
M ''V • ` 1' I
j ~ ,k ' .
N
11114 ❑ k ' -'4!
t • C + 4,
.1 k
60
o.
ri 15
a ~LW# a . 11
z a Cl ~ 1 11
1 C 1 .3,
YI Q n
I'd
d 4.
4 4
IIIIIIIIIdd Co
I
' d Id .
1,
~ - ~e7YS iaf_ - > - ~awc or ~.sr r- _ ' c ~ r Y. - - ~s"y " =M-`•'-~•
-Ate 07fl T~ ' 0 6187
o_ Box lZM2
M LAS, nX. 752yf .
z 3Z
.•e .
_ +uR MAO MOOtl
- t~C[NST sq .sHD RAli MOTOR w0. _
W8TRUMON$ AMOUNT
7- FllrH
0 D~ 0 WASH p Pousm ❑
Q CATS OR 0 TRAM.
asm.
Ole
~a 6
Y _ V WAM FAM FOR DMIc how
❑ DKCAID lA11TS Told lobo. qZl] p
L r- ' . R -
V TOTAt Pm rs Sn"n Amom!ARTS A* LABOR
Totd Parts -
CA. 0~
oft. oq -,a
+t-`- ~ Cbz G.~asr C _ Accesae.,es -
; i- Told Gas-Od-CNear~ TraT. Tubes
ESMATE TOTAL / Oo7s dew«k
O, A ap-v. Rr a+, u.d....xf. r...b dw.A..>. a.s *-.b. v..+,e. ew ro F~. -^der-. s-~a.ae...
tOTAl
- r y d ~.eo%.A~we.
t yt 2 V *t k Aadsor*zed by •rA7[
Dale Dettve.ed - U
TOTAL AMOUNT - 7
, Ar, A A r 1 w 1 . j.
-.n ~1~ ail 7 ~11 , I+ h t „71. ; •r '7. J r t r
4$ 471 i. I•QZtrfr'• i{ fr ~1,~,~! 1lii, I.k~.,~ id`i • ,
M►M{~» o cacaPw ; ('REPAIR ORDER
0. YY % it ' 1. . 1'. 1. 0 o J. op
t q
di lof, x
0
a y i N 1 1 .i. Teo
a 99
i r O ' Q~ O O
7 jgq - .17 '
7 ti
o, 11 e ;
VVoooV
.I
b :
ON,
4.
44
.r .4 ?4
~pyQ p.
L# a U
. S 1 1 V 9
0
W s W are
00
x,ut C d g$$ y
MIN
- d
p .4
0 4 1. to
N A.\WpY F ! ~y y
is A
' " 911104 1 .1101 fIQ1' . ~ 'ItLNe Wl~111ia 1 ,,1~ fF r'!~ ~ P ~ ";~~jrn 5~ 7T~,r, -/~y'~ ' f '~It.~~,~. r!Y . {M"r " .
OA 141• U27~(y11t { r y r M, J7.
I 777= 7.~+,♦ ,i 1 ♦ r CIS 41 'I'I ri t 6 44
{ 4"yl lil rt, i Ir f 'J~
* 10 +y1 ti ill' 'r 14\
} ~V /~,Iyp ~ J y "f r., • '>•Li~"If',t!'il'll+'~ f4hCt irk`l r~el r1~;I J,II+},j I}A;-_. r , ` i{,." rr ; , 1 1
41 1..~'f'1 4~ {•,v ">~r ti~ j',~ l
Noill '14
Ad&t
-22 Ll
6 A660 No. Qotr ~
r• _ 41 Sphdomotr 5erla4• ` ' {
Readln~ Nc
4,0
I''~a ,MA4IMOOII. 11GhSA N?0100 SIAM, ~MOtOR HB., 4 hi f~
A',; . t '1 t'I,1 , "FZ r+, ~iy 1 i' 1l U1.•1 IyII .1111' 7 37 ru , ~Sr,4 ~N
. .I uwn 1r15r10uGrraNS'' 'll;i ''AA4oyPl1~" 'yo'
„ s;
WeAI• c}iANOe FIUSM fWSM'' tr
4 CAit' OIL Q tRAh15. 0 DIFF. 0 WASk•POUSFF
} I
O r~f~
AC fed,r v ;+n ~i
os' :p;
~I~yt
, 41f'
t I i ~ ~•.I,Iv
1 RtTAIN PARTf 1010 Iwo"IM0160 OIS<AM1 fA1TS 10101 teba
;i TOTAL PARTS f 6 MAN AM"011 PARTS AND LA101 Total Penh (~b
0011 Oa ^6 a G www tuy /r' 4 04, Ott, OrroM ' `
Oh. Oil (q1 RwW n:e«o Ata44orla r:I .4
164.Orro>. ~ rlrti. Tvbn
r Oa•OiLOrrolo
ISTIMAT!'tOTAI ► Ouhid•wmlc '
11 II Total I boo" 4.twM III. JIM r~ .rMl to w iM n4't ~+•wr1Y, w w.4" Nrl, I" CM/w "w MOW"" r+M~NIM rs
~I 0+ 4w e" rM to. rrrd a'IMiw nwon dr,YliN •Y, a Y•. . h,. IN n+now M n,r y 04JM ~AW*l AA NM•,o ~K/aM'f TOTAL Q 6 ! .
I fHll R Ar,o►, a4nwVgN M •i•W to. rM sM,M N 1op"j 4*4
~y
Work Authorial by Dote Promis TAX
Del vend to _ Dote Del ivered TOTAL AMOUNT' X06'" 00 '
+ +P,?lSYkES-"'~" - - >•...iniil , sk. , ..I{ Ni Awra4w
1 i~' I .Y, t.~4•Sy{y ' t.5 d ti~~ et A'tr +I iY.i• L~.i'~~I,:.., .,.,,.t F i, 'i, l;.y ' ' ji,n
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA
HACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETINGt November 11 1983
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 11 Consent agenda
SUBJEM Purchase order 60008 to Herb's Body Shop
SUMMARY1 This purchase order is for the repair of body damage
to our vehicle number 1850, an International truck
used in the Soild Waste department, This is an
emergency repair to get the unit back into service
as noon as possible,
ACTION REQUIRM Approval by council,
SOURCE OF FUNDS. Budget account 100-002-0803-8342,
RMOMMENDATIONi We recommend this emergency purchase order b~
approved for payment in the amount of $3,224,64
to Herb's Body Shop,
EXHICITSt eppy o nvoice and copy of purchase order,
SUBMYTTED BY. C ~'C~1 Ct'C
15b,1'. Marshall, C,P,M,
Purchasing Agent
wI T jr VACIUN, NVRQNASINQ RIP
218 8, MoKinney j.. • \ ~r ?
Denton, Texas 78111 ` S
8171881.8311 DIP ' ' +~a
w MRtN 217•0042 own
Heo rb'• Body shop ;
OMIYIRY ASA? rao: 7%0.004.• 59"n(
Tot CITY OF DINTON
_ veb3clat N+slnt.
8014 Tez" 8t.
DoutanoTesae 76201
SHOW P.Q. NO. ON ALL SHIPMENTS, OELIVEAY TICKETS, INVrOICHS 6TC.•40NO INVOICES-TO ACCOUlNTS PAYABLE, TH6 CITY OF QENTON, TIKXAS
IS EXEMPT FROM SALES TAX AS PER HOUSE 81 LL #go- '0111 CITY OF OENTOH IS PROHIBITED FROM PAYINQ FOR MEROHANOISE SE!<ORC IT IS
RECEIV90. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST B$ F.O.B., CITY OF OSNTON, TEXAS.... .
ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER OESCRIPTION' QUAN./UNIT PRIOR AMOUNY
Hag 11854 `
Repair Body Douga 1r0T
,
coovV."111x1' liU~LL
D
r ry
E1
Olrect All Inquirles To:
CITY OP DENTON, PURCHASINd DEPT,
John J, Marshall, C,P,M., Purchasing Agent
Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M., Asst., Purchasing Agent
URN. PAR !10. ~C,i I W t'i !l ~ S ~~,•j~~ )J~
PAICt S V l/ ~ U S lA O
CrusoM Auto Paigfling
~ WRb'CK~5R S~RVIC~'
1.817..566.5530 gQVTB ReOk 430
_V• NAyl,xf„t' e O OONTON, MAS 70701
Solid I to
den pt aerl 10.17.89
AODRf f3
~AKfAY00tl. .PHONE NO,~_~_
IiCSNSt N0. A S7A E p0i0
Intl truo Unit 1850 N
ftRIAL x0, M1ltA0t
A
Of SCRIPT ION OP YORK
p~int`and repair ~ oe~ r estimate
2754
SI ole nt Under Dab danta e
1 l Total
! I 3224
OVAN, ACCTSSOAIft
PAICt TOrAI, lAAOA
TOTAL, PAAr3
ACCSSSORIfS
SALIS TAX
AYhMna ee~AlA TOTAL, ACCEfSORIdf
^w"A"Tepee"~uo~b~ r.nw T rOrAL AYOUNT
YRAN d*6
eseT"eoL, b 11Y t.1X tW,j 4
ft r RaMt f a It IA 4IA44 YNAT YOY I1lL MOT 11 M Le A
1.MY IM 0 Nt •Y YOWR~ 1 /V.Y444T",*Y M run To oil ",40t IIrOYU I Mqq, 1 MMC Yd r1Y Oyy py MLMMY M 4R M OR fATUTA00Ay TIIW TA YpW,
IHAAVn goo Rae ?t$" AT NY OR" A64 '+00M"0L'' raw CAR OA
u1TM see ltll w W SfORk AyT?IORI;gyp w eAM M rMU, t"", "40"
OR / rM~11
M OttIVStRS ~y
►fC:IV10 rY.~-terry t-r-s~ ~ •~i 'L'
~ l
CITY OF DENTON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST FORM*
DATE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING t_ November 1, 1989
ITEM TO BE PLACED ON AGENDAt
1. Word item exactly as it Is to be placed on agenda.
Include any Advisory Board Recommendations.
2. List backup materials (to be submitted no later than
1Ot00 a.m. Thursday, prior to the council meeting,)
3. State the order in which the item needs to appear on
the agenda,
I Ir
(7 r r
1, Purchase order to continue leasing aystom software from I,B,D1.
on o month-to-month basis, The purchase order would allow for
twelve months loase of the currant software and would amount to
$19,512,
2. Memorandum to C. Chris !Hartung, City DInnnger, in reference to
the Ddtn Processing Advisory board meeting,
Agenda of the Data Processing Advisory8oard meeting held on
Tuesday, October 25, 1983.
3, Consent Agenda
* THIS FORM IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY 10:00 A.M. OF THE
MONDAY OF THE WEEK PRIOR TO THE REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING. ONLY ITEMS OF A CRITICAL, NATURE WILL BE
ACCEPTED AFTER THIS TIME.
NOTEt Please use a separate request form for each item
that is submitted..
CITY OF DENTON
CITY COUNCIL AGRNDA prQUEST FORM*
DATE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 1, 1989
ITEM TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA:
1, Word item exactly as it Is to be placed on agenda.
Include any Advisory Board Recommendations,
2. List backup materials
10(to he submitted no later than
t00 a.m, Thursday, prior to the council meeting,)
3. State the order in which the item needs to appear on
the agenda,
1. Purchnso order to continue the month-to-month contract for
to provide hardware motntonnoce on all computer equipment except
terminals, This purchase order would cover twelve months and
would amount to $45,602,88,
2, emorandum to 0, Chris Hartung, City Hannger, in reference to
Data Processing Advisory Board Necting
Agenda of the Data Processing Advisory Board meeting held on
Tuesday, October 25, 1983,
3. Consont Agenda,
* THIS FORM IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY 10:00 A.M. OF THE
hIONDAX OF THE WEEK PRIOR TO THE REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING. ONLY ITEMS OF A CRITICAL NATURE WILL BE
ACCEPTED AFTER THIS TIME,
NOTE: Please use a separate request form for each item
that is submitted..
1
CITY OF DENTON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST FORM*
DATE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 1, 1983
STEM TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA:
Word item exactly as it 'is to be placed on agenda.
Include any Advisory Board Recommendations.
2. List backup materials (to be submitted no later than
10:00 a,m. Thursday, prior to the council meeting.)
3. State the order in which the item needs to appear on
the agenda,
1, purchase order ko continue tiio month-to-montli contract for I,B.M,
to supply local program support. This purchase order would cover
twelve months and would amount to $3,864
2, Memorandum to C, Chris Hartung, City ~Ianagcr,in reference to
Data Processing Advisory Board DIueting,
Agenda of Data Processing Advisory Board Meeting held on Tuesday,
Octo4er 25, 1983,
3, Consent Agenda,
* THIS FORM IS TO BE :IUBMITTED BY 10100 A.M. OF THE
MONDAY OF THL WEEK PRIOR TO THE REGULAR COUDICTL -
MEETING. ONLY ITEMS OF A CRITICAL NATURE WILL BE.
ACCEPTED AFTER THIS TIME,
NOTE: Please use a separata request form for each item
that is submitted..
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MVNIC/PAL BUILDING / 0EN70N, 76XAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $66.8200
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
rRai, Gary A, Collins, Director of Data Processing
DATE; October 25, 1983
SUBJECT; DATA PROCESSING ADVTSORY BOARD MEETING
Unfortunately the Data Processing Advisory Board did not have a quorum
present at the meeting this morning and consequently did not vote on any
items on the agenda. I have attached a copy of our agenda for your review.
In discussions with the two members present it was agreed that items 3
through 9 on the agenda were merely continuations of contracts that have already
been approved by th,) City Council and were necessary items for the operation of
the computer. Also in these discussions it was agreed that items 1 and 2
were replacements for the contracts that were in force last fiscal year with
these two firms at a reduction in the amount of the contract by $22,000
and $13,000 respectively,
Since the ordinance creating the Data Processing Board expires in November
of 1983, I polled the two members present as to their opinion on the
continuation of the Data Processing Advisory Board, Mr, Ron McDade indicated
he felt the board should remain in existence and be called only on those
items of major significance, Mr. McDade expressed his concern that if an
item arose in which the Council felt the need for advice from the Data
Processing Advisory Board, it would be more expeditious if that Board was
in existence rather than a new board created. Mr, Dale Maddry expressed his
feeling that the Board has served out its useful purpose unless major items
such as new software packages or new equipment were brought to the Board
early in tiie evaluation period in order to take advantage of the Board's
experience and expertise,
At the August 10 meeting of the Data Processing Advisory Board when this
subject was first mentioned, Mr, Ray Pittman and Mr, Gerald Cardwell
expressed their opinion that the Data Processing Advisory Board had fulfilled
its useful life since the major hardware and software acquisitions had been
completed,
At both this morning's meeting and the prior meeting T expressed my feeling
that the Data Processing Board had performed a vital service to the City and
I personally felt they had been a great benefit to me and had served as an
Memo to Chris Hartung
RR Data Processing Advisory Board Mooting
October 25, 1983
Page 2
important link between the City Council and the Data Processing Department,
At both mootings z polled the members on their willingness to serve another
term and Mr. Cardwell, Mr, Maddry and Mr, McDade all indicated their
willingness to serve another term.
1
A4.30 / e
ary A,/ o s -
Director oP Data Processing
CIAC: ce
f
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
Octr,her 25, 1983
Special called meeting of the City of Denton Data Processing
Advisory Board, Tueec16y, October 25, 1983 at 7100 a,m, at the
Ramada Inn Restaurant meeting room, Denton, Texas,
Monthly Annually
1, Priority Systems Contract $ $ 15,000,00
2, TRES Contract 25,000,00
3, I,B,M, Software (lease) 7,626,00 194912,00
4, I,B,M. Lease/purchase
of hardware 38,065.69
5, ITT Lease/purchase and
maintenance on terminal 3,297,50 39,570,00
6, First Municipal Lease/purchase
of disks and tapes 21852.00 34,224,00
7, I,8,M, Local Program Support 322,00 31864,00
8, Hardware Maintenance 3,800,24 45,602,88
9, Computer Associates 705.00 8,460,00
CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA
RACK-UP SUMMARY SHEXT
MEETING UATE1 November 1) 1983
SU13JE(31 Approval of rile preliminary replat of the
Mesquite Ridge Townhouse Addition
SUMMARYt 't'his is a 5,936 acre tract located at the
northeast corner of Bernard and Collins
Streets. The property is zoned multi-
family (MV-1) and the intent of the replat
is to oliminato two (2) lot lines and form
a one (1) lot subdivision. The devel per
proposes to construct twenty-four (W
multi-family atr.ucturoa (96 total dwelling
units) and sell each structure individ-
ually.Parking open space and all
property not utilized for, public facili-
ties will be reserved for, common area.
Adequate water, and sewer) electrical,
telephone, gas and cable services are
available for extension to this site.
Bernard Street is an improved collector.
Collins Street is unimproved and is
subject to perimeter street paving poli-
cies. Drainage is a mayor consideration
and engineering plans for improvements
must be approved during the final platting
stage.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary replat
RECOMMENDATIONI The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.
ALTERNATIVESf 1. Approve the preliminary replat with
conditions.
2. Approve preliminary replat without
conditions.
ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat
~IJ a "
David Ellison
Development Review Planner
•11.1 II 1 111111 HI 111 1.11
111 II 111 111 V1~
1 o rt ~ ; der'nertl 91 /
N
j 11 • IJ
~ Ib1ny4,10 6~n1.wi ca ~ Y~---~- f.
t
f'
1 111•
a f ! f
..I,.. Ell H '
I I 1 fY
l
3y n~ 1 U
n i l
q Y i I ~ t{(f
N ~
r r ~i [i
I l Il ~ fix! ~ f
1 ! ~ 113
a ~ ~ 13~ , ' i r ► j!)i ,
e
c(~7TY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY S E%T
MEETING DATEi November 11 1983
SUBJECTt Approval of the final replat of lots 3, A,
5, 6 and part of lot 2, Mercer Addition
.SUMMARY; The proposed final replat of the above
referenced lots involves property recently
rezoned from single family (SF-7) to two
family (2-F) classification. Location of
the property is north of Sherman Drive
between Bolivar and North Elm Streets,
Lot sixes proposed ara approximately
71 feet x 251 feet on the Bolivar Street
lots, and approximately 68 feet x 151 feet
on the North Elm Street lots. If approved,
each individual lot will include desig-
nated "A" sides and "B" sides. Two family
development is anticipated and splitting
the lots individually would permit indivi-
dual sale of each side of the duplex and
potential owner occupancy. Adequate water,
sewer, electrical, telephone, cable T.V.,
drainage and street systems are in place
and available to this site. In accordance
with subdivision regulations, sidewalks
will be installed along the North Elm
Street frCt"-Age of the property.
State statuteb require a public hearing
and notification of property owners
within the preceding subdivision before
Planning and Zoning Commission considera-
tion of this item. City ordinances also
require that a courtesy notice be mailed
to property owners in a 200 foot area out-
side of the subdivision. Twenty percent
(20%) or more of the property ow,tiers did
not file written protest, therefore, the
replat should be approved.
1
City Couitoil Naok•up
Meroer Addition
Page 2
ACTION RMQUIRMUI Approval of the replat,
RMCOMMMNDAVONI The Planning and Zonin Commission r.eoom.
mends approval, of the final replat,
ALTERNATIM Approval of the filial replat
ATTACHMK NTI Reduoed r,eplat
David 4111non
Development Review Planner
I
10t Id ~ I
J
t16Ea1r nti~ OOS 464 Cl1AEH N a SEA~(~
' Yul0/VA6i } YiM/P 77j
1
1 I' • ~I ~
A I d
Yde, 0e41
--r-----~ Ib 1 c:)
od4~4'~
3 ~ !Q q
n AA opt
-16!!2SR2W @y
`
4A X M I it
1 f »
MAW" q O 4 4d
I I"!% ee 1 4 W 1e1o e6 eaw Islo " '
%f6N10.311 I O. O. TPA"
f 6.16.64
I `r
81 ~
Pd SOALe
Seoi11 1" r 50' FINA1, PLAT 1A4A710N MAP
Rrt A Sudy0ASt/ 24,Iib 2mm MERCER ADDITION
' 84164 6 REPLAT of Lon 7,4,5,6 8 Plitt of 2, Block 2,
AL. MERCER A041TION, Rscotdsd IA Vol, 142, 151,301
City 8 ~~unfy of 00nton,14,00
GYN6NS
GALE IAWIN PUSSELL TRAPP
419 9, Cortoll BIYd. 1602 Anno
Ootdon, Taos 01ntoA, To Rot
auPit k4/ i nH
h~
1
"ITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATEi November 1, 1983
SUHJECTI Approval of the final replat of lot 2R,
Denl;on Shopping Center, Addition
SUMMARY1 Lot 2B of the Denton Shopping Center
Addition is the designated site of Handy
Dan Home lg rovemant Center, The sole
intont o£ t~e replat is to relocate an
existing fire lane easement,
ACTION REQUIREDI Approval of the final replat
RECOMMENDATIONI All r,eyuiremonts have been met, The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
ap p roVtl 1,
ALTERNATIVE Approve final replat
ATTACHMENTS Reduced replat r
l.i;Jl.J~3UY
av E lison
Development Review Planner
'0
!.O1 4
LOT 1A A
.a•'/ I44I if , i,'a 'r
f IM W, h lyr
{ 1
~f 9al,~;1 Iota Ittlw,l~+ y ~ Rill IY
' JG1FI / 40' a 1+r urt~r+:;~~p. ~~~.l~i~~~' oft III
e
t Y.~aL+__ '+R' ~r~ SS p .141, ill. Iwy1 uNl'IM ,M..nm i I.: ~ I'1 : a , n
le LN / 111u<,tll
10~ n.,
Y
ti ~ Ilr,
111 WN11a1, ',1u, .x'111 n Y'v ,Y' 1
T , 11 111 1 '.1 u urv
40T 20 r .".1 ..i, n. i'•' a ,1h„i61d. .n 161,1
'1\ .l l.: .li r I~r . t l'I'' Ir, 1 . II.I 11 rl liy
1 ~''rli 1•u • r . i I: Dili fl 11, 1.1.111 1 111 ,1
4 .1 r : 41'11 Ila«~ 1111,1: i.
.IINIs .r 11,1+ 1611 ? _ vl ul ai .,N1 111
'A 2 L 40T toll,
U ' ~ t1,1Yq
r v y C l 1'q°o' i I~ ~i'•'L,ttii~~'~it~i'1rT"~-
2 + 1 i ~to
10it
11' r,,,t ~ ,11
1 ,
i 1 Nrer Yl'1 t1.~
t\ H1J' ~J- y'I
r[t rw 1
H/'It U'1 IOO' / ❑ 11' 1'1
031. dtAH .l rh RK 4
..c ,an nuwn yiMl rNl
1 .\I4! K. IN mil0jw 1:',1116 n Vrt1 :e,
/ ~I r10a00'4d L tlliaalh Ili ;1 1. 116//111 uaM I4 h 00 LI IM
NNNp I 1,1040' Y N41M6 ba,,1.N 1„•Al11rtlJ 1a U, l,1r„Iry ln111o.1'llr
11 I, N00' a M4 10'lll\pn If rr '44'4 ml.l,: lhW 141 Va
t \ , 1164 Wwl\1 Mw nu.IJ glU,l lhl•1n II
I llM l"I pw ..I 1411 41 rul" Intl C
1 'al 41...~,y~ _ vlr.
1 or ?a# J Jl.
te 40,01 8 / .r
PHI 11,
9 M ~k I~Ye
R'I' Y• Il llelt tM'''.d.
y~,1 • Yw MI frl
SYy~J~1 l1 9' ,S I. t 1.. ~ f
iti~aAl9 1.
`YALE `11\ Of,
L
I'N llw, 011111 to NYYYI IINwa Y J-• , fT ,Y o1Zry
Tillu u'. "vul' , fl .
N0TE ?'ri
C , b, I
10010A719 10Arlox9 01 I NC 24r 1181 LANE
WHION NAVI 4I1N AMS10 OUt rO OHAHOt$
IN ?HI SUILOfNO 080NIrA4, ALL OrN1A ' 1+r
INAORNA LION IS AS SHOWN ON TNd OLAr
S AS 0100AOS0 IN CASINO 0, 1401 NO LOCH?fON P
00 rNI 0INr0N 00u11i>+Y Otto Ato0R09,
OINTON 000NYYr rIIAS.
SUIT. Roll U 41Ir ItAll 01
IIOYA 0 4 e
l1 ❑1n„ l.Jlh D• 1gll r n . In.IIUlM ROllr IRl' LOT 2 B, 1
9+Iw,o1 1. 14 Milt 41 t4.\1 6, 'ILK, 161111, Itivl AI'
Olel nw YM toallM lkn /1vm.1 Wb41 4,y H '.J1 {,iid~'11t>' !
.pr le ll ay l4 r^ Iw 11. nl LH 111. lir M Va.n I Iii t
%IIM N,1„A .,.1, II16,.r l 1,,,..,.11,1. :;F~`pl A REVISION TO LOT 28
Of A 06101111011 1lAi Or
~a.1-• ~ DENTON SHOPPING CENTER ADDITION
Imo'"' ~ 1 TTr,--"-' DENTON, TEXAS
(CASINtr 0 PACE 100)
2eATA d1 TIIAL R , our 60 lot
or PAN"" A JOHN Wc9OWAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 797
III 1[y^, I 111 Sf4d 1,0-°"°AV u`"°"'y' °ieollM to . W DANIEL LAMBERT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NOI 181
411f~ JI."6:";nd eeineuleda Mllel- L"rtil tAe'i .d la 4
II rlh. J.S. TAPT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1288 '
IaRa lot 041 DO "441 end 46f id4latlenl therein Italed,
d9$ 1 U hand Ind Ieti el Olllte Ihla /w✓ d1
41'=v't9$ T NANCY CAN DENTONCOUNTY,TEXAS
/909 fRC01Nf0R9BUA0 AOAO
SU1r1 114
JAN ANTONIO, WA.9 14129 8EP17191~
dl:'444.1441
BACK-UP CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING DATE, November 1, 1983
SUBJECTS Approval of the final replat of the Reding
Addition
SUMMARY; This is an approximately 11,700 square
foot tract located off the northeast cor-
nor, of East McKinney and Ruddell Streets,
The property is zoned general retail (OR);
specific development plans have not been
revealed, Adequate water, sewer., electri-
cal telephone and gas facilities are
available to serve the site. No street
improvements are required, The engineer-
ing department is requiring the developer
to insure that drainage is handled by an
existing storm drain inlet along the east
side of Ruddell Street, Compliance with
drainage requirements can be handled dur-
ing the building permit stage,
ACTION REQUIREDf Approve the final replat,
RECOMMENDATON; The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval of the final replat,
ATTACHMENT; Reduced fin.Al replat
r
a d E1 ison
development Review Planner
1 Su EY p.gb \
JO~ai„pp BR~~K YIA 6 Ap~111QN f w~
T SITE /
4 r 2 K ~ ~ i
OOG 10 \ IA ArION i /
p Jam,
44
W li•
I
I
o LOr BLOCK '
j
0. ,?70 Ac,
I
G
Ora 300' .0 . 60 1'
ry
All
i
'60',90w -c
OWN(N
JOrIN P EHRr~ARi
92, NINOSOR MYC
OENTON, TEXAS 16201
Ordonic Scold in real
Lowe-- M W M
:lNAI. PLAT
LOT 1 BLOCK 1
REDING ADDITION
CITY dnd COUNTY of DEN10N, r0AS
02.,Q d re Dr•1, or i_of r Block ()Of College view
SEFtTa BE4 15,083 Add,rron recorded n VoIL316 PQ, 4 DR,D.CT.
• r.. ti r~ ti~•r~1 M M SFr FM M.r r N r~1 nil +.i "rr r•.~ 4~ ~M ~w rrr w! r rr.r W r.J r.y i~1 r ..i .i
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION 2301 M Street, NW, Washington, 0,0, 216 11,E 5~
1
R, E. NELSON 9J30/83
I) R OF UT LIT ES OATS
215 L GY HT G POWER
O N1"pN ELEINN
1\~\
NN MST W /mill~
T~XAS 76201 INVOICE NO. 0 066[4
L_
ACCOUNT CODED ENTN-OENTO-TX-MU
•
$201000,000 X 0.0002630
$12033*232 X 000001100
499084 X $0,00530
41689 X $0.00295
SERVICE FEE FOR 12 MONTHS BEGINNING 10/ 1/83 s?1246.35
TOTAL DUE $91246.35
SCRVICESS AND tRESEARCH IN POWER SUPPLY, ENGTNEERTNG AND OPERATIONS
)UNTING Ar~O FISIANC`i(~ ENER~/GY MAYA_GNNETTFF, PHUHBLIC ANgDg GENERAL INPORMAT ON1
TOTAOAFCE WSSHUIyi~NAAKUYEEIS,ppSEONN DEDUCTIBLE' ppOC4TTYT0{AFOf~ 3360 OF
iCRIPTI0 S TO THE APPA WEEKL NEWSLETTER TO dHICH YO R UrIL TY IS
ITLED.
31esse return one copy of Invoice with payment ORIGINAL