HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-01-1983
American Public Power Aiisocfatfor
SURV OF PUBLICLY OWNSp ELECTRIC~STEMS Lo `ra 4 II,j
Name of Utility Dr /V J'o I✓ (I iv; ; Q a U 1"i I P TI t rlfj
i
Addeoss~ ' .1 S f~'~ c w tj
City! ) r 'N t C r State. T k• x zip `l (p 2 U 1 11! PIBAS@ RETURN THIS COMPLETE
rounone rclude area code) _ 117 ti 6 _ $ z'141 QUBSTiONNAIRB TOl
Narnf anndddj:tiee of C,+ief CHIcer of System d6ANNl6 KILMIR
--4= -Selo
, / r51 Statiatla/Dep Pto4►pinp'MMeper
/~4r'C''GtrC CI tit"%Li T/CS APPA
2301 M Street, N.W.
Name of Person Comoteting Questionnaire L /Yi! I S'r-~ Washington, D. C, 20037
Cats Form Completed (month(day/yearl__ Tdephonu 202/7754100
1
INSTRUCTIONS
-Give 1982 data for all nuestions --either calendar or fiscal year.
If a question does not apply to your utility, such as a question shout electric gene(a.
ring equipment, please write "NA" by the question number and go on to the follow.
Jng question,
-Numerals in parentheses are for office use only,
1) ELECTRIC SALES STATISTICS
NO, OF ELECTRIC CROSS E1.9C7RIC
CUSTofvlaAs KWH SALES OPpRATINO REVENUES
A) Resldantial / 7 7 P9 )
. d
BI Commercial 12 ! 3 r- p ~T, 7 rJ
C) Industrial
D) Other $alas I/ a 2'C- 2 r1 7,21
E1 Total Retail Js"! .7 5 9p'W_ 95~f 1 4N4f
i
F) Wholesale (Resale) 2/ l ~G LZ Q
(1) Total Retail and Wholesale l9 ti°~l, Sr 161
11 Inetudee Itrigatlon, other farm, street lighting, munlolpa( sales, ate; does not Induda interdepartmental transfers of 4t4otrtalty, +
211n4tuder only firm power trsntwionr severing periods of twelve months or more,
2) TOTAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT PAYMENTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: S 'fee' ooo
(Olreet payments + total taxes, in•lleuof•tax psymente, and dlreet transfers to government or nlunklpal fund,
Indlreet payments ■ velue of free or subsidlxed enorpYl that Is, hating or 114htJng of schools, firehouses, at other
munkipal bu(Idings, or street tightfng that is below 4ort.1
31 YEAR PUBLICLY OWNED ELECTRIC SYSTEM WAS ESTA8LISHED:/ /1905, Irt!
41 NET ELECTRIC PLANT INVESTMENT: S Z -7,/__1 3 s, fG ~
(Utility plant less accumulated provision for depreciatlon and amort(2ation. Do not include nuclear fuel.)
t} NO. OF FUL,L•TIME ELECTRIC UTILITY EMPLOYEES: 9
CHECK REQUISITION-VOUCHER
ec Number Number
Pay to $9,246, 35
Ount
--American Publin POWOr Aga ignn{At, inn atxAf. ion
2301 M. Street, N,W apartment
Ontnhar In
pate ~ 15,83_._,
Washington, D.C. 20037
Acct, Balance Invoice date numbar and/or ex lanation Account No, Net Inv, Amount
Sarvice fee for 12 months
beginning 10/1/83 10-008-0250- $9,246,35
8505-E921
TOTAL $9,246,35
The above has been reviet_ed and recoatnendation for pa ent is ade by the undersigned.
lC o D~~
Acoounting Approval Signature
Citq Manager Approval Director of Financa Approval
MY of ONN'rON,TEXAS _ MUNICIPAL BUtLVING / DENTON, TEXAS 16201 ~ TELEPHONE (817) 566-000
M r M O 11 A N D U M
TOt Mayor Stewart and City Council Members
FROM: G, Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATE= October 17, 1983
SUBJECI,, CONTRACT WITH RESOURCE iNC,
Attached is a proposed contract with Resource Inc, for the purchase of a Human
Relations/Customer Service training program, This program includes two ninety
minute videos, student's audio tapes, facilitator's guides, training for up to
four facilitators, participant's texts and customizing for the City of
Denton, The training for facilitators is scheduled to begin on November 29
and implementation of the program is projected for January 1984,
This training pprogram will enable us to provide customer relations training
for employees in Utilities, Water and Sewer, and Customer Service, However,
it can be used in any area where the employees have contact with the public.
The program will not become outdated and will be usable for new employees as
well as providing a refresher program for other employees, the funds for this
training program were budgeted as a supplemental package in the Utilities
Department Budget for FY 1983/84. The payments for this purchase will be paid
in three intervals as follows:
o 25% due upon receipt of invoice
(October 1983),
o 65% due ten days after facilitator training
(November 29, 1983).
o 10% due after receipt of all materials (approximately
December 15, 1983).
The total cost of the program is $7,640, Should you have any further
questions regarding this contract, please let me know.
G. Ch9sHarrtUngj ty Mena r
GCHtce
attachment
01882
ciryol veNTCN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL. BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 5668200
MEMORANDUM
TOr Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
FROMI Kathryn Usrey, Personnel Administrator
DATEi October 17, 1983
SUBJECTI SCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM FOR NOVEMBER 11 1983
Attached is a council agenda item regarding a contract with Resource Inc, for
the purchase of a Customer Service training program. The money for this
training program was budgeted as a supplemental package in the Utilities
budget for FY 1983/84. This cost includes the basic training package which
consists of two ninety minute videos, two student audit tapes, four
facilitator's guides, two carrying cases, 1-4 facilitators trained in Tampa
(not including personal expenses), customizing for texts and topes and twenty
student texts, The facilitator training for this program is tentatively
scheduled for November 29 through December 2. Program materials will be
shipped within 10 days after facilitator training and we should be ready to
implement this program by January 1, 1984,
The City of Denton presently has a contract with Resources for some of our
safety programs, John Maxwell has been very pleased with the quality of these
programs. A representative from Resources presented a program preview and the,
quality of the video and the participant workbooks was excellent. Beverly
Little, Customer Service Mainager, attended a two clay workshop at Resources and
hiply recommends the program. Because it is specifically tailored for
Ut lities, it will be an extremely beneficial training program for our
employees, However, it can be used in any area where the employee has contact
with the public. A list of user agencies supplied by Resources is attached.
The Dallas Water Utilities was contacted and they are very satisfied with this
program,
The objective of this training is to teach employees to operate effectively
under stressful situations and to deal productively with customer related
problems. The program focus is on the most useful proven elements of
Transactional Analysis along with other applicable techniques. It consists of
Memo to Betty MCKoan
REi Council Agenda Item for,November 1, 1963
• page 2 4
a 16 hour modular program complete with facilitator's handbooks and
participant's workbooks, There is also a provision for a refresher course for
all participants, The textbooks and video tapes will be customized with the
City of Denton's logo,
Should you have any further questions regarding this request, please let me
know,
Rat ry Usrey, pe- onnel A m n s razor'
KUice
attachment
01877
USSR COMPANIES OF THE SIX MODULES BASIC PROGRAM
CUSTOMER RELATIONS FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES
Alabama Power Company Ken Stewart
(205) 783.6244
American Electric Power Service Company Ken Shearer
(614) 223.1374
Anaheim Public Utilities Department Ed Alario
(714) 999.5100
Arizona Public Service Company Dee Saager
(602) 271.7006
Arkansas Power & Light Company Jack Cato
(501) 371.4176
Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Richard Mason
(301) 234.7274
Black Hills Power & Light Company Gene Raetz
(605) 342.3200
Burbank Public Service Department J. 1, Perry
(213) 847.9631
Central Illinois Light Company Sue Wenger
(309) 672-5291
Central Louisiana Electric Company David Cruse
(318) 445-8211
Central Power & Light Company David Gula
(512) 881-5676
Central Vermont Public Service Company Jack Moore
(802) 773-2711
City of Calgary Paula Angus
(403) 263-6328
City of Cleveland Department of Puhlic Works Diane Kosla
(216) 664-2734
City of Lakeland George Yates
(813) 682-2885
City Utilities of Springfield Louis O'Neal
417 83I-8311
Ial am County Public Utility Phil Jackson
(206) 452-9771
Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc, Tom Beard
(904) 473-4911
Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company John Reed
(614) 464.7333
Commonwealth Electric Company Bob Comeau
(617) 291-0950
Co P, National Bob Battersby
(415) 680-7700
Dallas Water Utilities Stu Davis
(214) 670-3983
Dayton Power & Light Company Paul Harris
(513) 224-6121
Delmarva Power & Light Company Larry Hyde
(302) 429-3458
Duquesne Light Company Dick Lescott
(412) 393-6370
El Paso Electric Company Jack Duffy
(915) 543-5807
The Empire District Myron McKinney
(417) 623-4700
Florida Power & Light Company Rose Nelson
(305) 863.3699
Florida Power Corporation Judy Young
(813) 866-4197
r pale 2
Georgia Power Company Jack Morse '
(404) 626.3604
Gulf Power Company Shelby L, Walters
(904) 434.8616
Gulf States Utilities Frances Englebrecht
(713) A38.4366
Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc, Tom Hoshino
(808) 548.3594
Houston Lighting & Power Company Jerry Ferguson
(713) 228-9211
Hydro-Electric Commission of the
City of North York Lorne Peck
(416) 229.5014
Idaho Power Company Dennis Hall
(208) 383.2527
Iowa Power & Light Company Sue Vawter
(516) 281.2451
Iowa Southern Utilities Company Nub Oronert
(5,15) 437-4400
Jacksonville Electric Authority Ken Juhn
(904) 384.1637
Kansas City Board of Public Utilities Sylvester Byrd
{913) 281-8100
Kentucky Utilities Fred Spraggs
(606) 266.1461
Lake Superior District Power Company W. R. Roeming
(716 682.4511
Lee ounty Electric Co-Op., Inc, 0. D, Reynolds
(800) 282.1643
Long lsll,nd Lighting Company Leila Truman
(516) 228.2938
Louisville Gas & Electric Cordell Compton
(602) 666-4575
Madison Gas & Electric Company Mary Griffith
(608) 252.7094
Maine Public Service Company Charles Kilby
(207) 768.5811
Mississippi Power Company Cully Randall
(601) 864-1211
Mississippi Power & Light Company Fred Akers
(601) 969.2434
Missouri Association of Municipal Utilities Wendell Locke
(314) 635-4526 Gerald McHaffie
Missouri Power & Light Company Gary Tipton
(324) 636.0171
Missouri Utilities Company Dave Kaempfer
(314) 651-5653
Nantahala Power & Light Company Bill Yeiser
(704) 524-2121
New England Power Service Company Chet McKinley
(617) 366.9011
New York State Electric & Gas Corp, Greg Lapham
(607) 729-2651
i
i
page 3
Northeast Public Power Association 'licks King
(617) 237.9126
Northeast Utilities Service Company Byron Aubrey
(203) 666.6911
Northern Indiana Public Service Company Kris Emaus
(219) 886.5893
Northern States Power Company Ed Beyer
(612) 330.7631
Omaha Public Power District Doug Brown
(402) 536.4337
Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc, Mary Moy
(914) 352.6000
Otter Tail Power Company Dale Trosviq
(218) 736.5411
Pacific Power & Light Company Pam Strickfaden
(503) 243.4580 Alan Lindsey
Public Service Company of New Mexico Patrick Neal
(505) 848-2159
Public Service Company of Oklahoma Mike Fry
(918) 599.2929
Puget Sound Power & Light Company RoseAnn Webber
(206) 454.6363
Riverside Public Utilities Paul Osborne
(714) 787-7419
Rochester Gas & Electric Company Al Jones
(716) 646.2700
Rock Mount Utilities Ray Hart
(919 977.2111
Sacramento Municipal Utility Jerry Goetzman
(916) 452-3211
Salt River Project Nell Bennett
(602) 273-2060
Santee Cooper Roy L. Hunter
(803) 899-2121
Seattle City Light Naomi Smith
(206) 626-3000
Snohomish Public Utility District Joy Louia
(206) 258-8211
Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company Rod Penfield
(812) 464-4655
Tampa Electric Company Malcolm Hall
(813) 223-0800
Tennessee Valley Public Power Assn. Peter Dal]
(615) 756-6511
Union Electric Company Joe Schmid
(314) 621-3222
Upper Peninsula Power Company Frank Stipech
{906) 482-0220
Virgin Islands Water & Power tuthority Alma Lynton
(809) 774-3662
Wisconsin Electric Power Company Tom OeVeau
(414) 277-3202
Wisconsin Power & Light Company Kay Kirchner
(608) 262-3274
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Tom Smith
(414) 433-1057
iNDEFENDENTx NTRACT4A 5 AGREEWNT
THE STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DENTON KNOW 414 MEN BY THESE PRESENTSI
The City of Canton, Texas, a Municipal Home Rule city situateo In
Canton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City", acting herein by and through
Its City Manager, and RESOURCES, Inc. hereinafter Called Contractor, hareby
mutually agree as followst
1, SERVICES TO BE PHRFORM1EO1 City hereby retains Contractor to
perform a here na er designated services and Contractor
agrees to perform the following servicest
A. Provide the City of Denton with the followingt
"Human Relations Training'' For Municipalities BASIC Package
2 90 minutes videos
2 Student Audio Tapes
4 Facilitator's Guides
2 Carrying Cases
1.4 Facilitators trained In Tamps (not Including personal
expenses).
20 Student Texts
Customizing of text and video with City logo,
11, COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONTRACTORi City agrees to pay
an raotor ror t e sere ces per-ormed nareunder as followst
A. Amounts to be paid
"Human Relations Training"
for municipalities Basic Package $6,500,00
2 90 minute videos
2 Student Audio Tapes
4 Facilitator's Guides
2 Carrying Cases
1»4 Facilitators trained in Tampa (not Including personal
expenses).
Customir,ing charge for texts. 600,00
Customizing charge for city logo an tapes, 200,00
20 Custom Student Texts a $17,00 each, 340,00
0, Payments to contractor will be as followst
1) 25% payable upon receipt of Invoica S 11910,00
2) 65% due 10 days after facilitator training
(November 29 • December 2) 4,966,00
3) 10% due after receipt of all materials 764,00
TOTAL $7,640,00
III StP6L MON AND CONTROL BY CITY1 It Is mutually understood and
agreao oy anc between City an Contractor that Contractor is an
independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or
considered an employee of the City of Banton, Texas, for the
purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes,
vacation or sick leave benefits, or Any other City employee
benefit, the City shall not have supervision and control of
Contractor or any employee of Contractor, but It is expressly
1 understood that Contractor shall perform the services hereunder
at the direction of and to the satisfaction of the City Manager
of the City of Denton or his designee under this agrement
INDEPENCENT CONTRACTOR'S AGREEMENT
RESOURCES, INC, . PACE 1
IV, SOURCE OF FUNOSI Ali payments to Contractor under this
agrdemen "fro Eo be paid by the City from funds appropriated by
the City Council for such purposes in tho Budget of the City or
Centcn,
V. fNSU. RANW Contractor shall provide At his own cost and expense
wor ens compensation Insurance, liability insurance, and all
otner insurance necessary to protect Contraotor In the operation
of Witractor's business,
/I, CANCELLATION: City reserves the right to cancel this Agreement
at any time by giving Contractor thirty (30) days written notice
of It Intention to cancel this agreement,
VII, T RM OF CONTRAC71 This Agreement shall commence on the 20th day
o Octooer, 1983, and and on the 31st day of December, 1983,
EXECUTED this the
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
8Y1
0. CHRIS HARTLNG
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST,
Charlotte
an, C y ocre ary
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C,3, TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
8YI
RESOURCES, Inc,
WILLIAM SALZER, REPRESENTATIVE
BYI
That Kathryn Usrey, Personnel Administrator, is hereby designated as the
person to administer the provision of this agreement,
Date G, CHRIS H TUr , M N E,f E
INOEPENOENT CONTRACTOR'S AGREEMENT
RESOURCES, Inc, - PACE 2
1451P
10/11/83
1
CITY OF DENTON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REQUEST FORM*
DAVE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING( November 1, 1983
ITEM TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA=
1, Word item exactly as it 'is to be placed on agenda,
Include any Advisory Board Recommendations,
2, List backup materials (to be submitted no later than
1000 a.m. Thursday, prior to the council meeting,)
3. State the order in which the item needs to appear on
the agenda,
1. A contract for $15,000 with priority Systems) Inc, to provide
progrnmming support to the City of Denton on nn a)s oeoded
basis primarily in the nren of systems progrnmming but not limited
to this oven,
2. Memorandum to 0, Chris Hartung, City Manager in reference to
Data Processing Advisory Board Meeting,
Agenda of Data Processing Advisory Bonrd Meeting hold on Tuesdny,
Octobor 25, 1980,
totter from priority Systems, incorporated,
* THIS FORM IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY 10t00 A.M. OF THE
MONDAY OF THE WEER PRIOR TO THE REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING. ONLY ITEMS c>F A CRITICAL NATURE WILL BE
ACCEPTED AFTER THIS TIME.
NOTEi Please use a separate request form for each item
that is submitted.,
Q 1
ctrrof DENrON, r1ffXAS MUNICIPAL RUILOING / PENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $668201
MI'MORANDUM
'1'O; G. Chris Hartung, City Managor
Rol: Gary A, Collins, Director of Data Processing
DA'I'II, October 2S, 1983
SUBJIiCI'7 DATA PRM, SSING ADVISORY BOARD ME111'ING
Unfortunately the Data Procossing Advisory Board did not have a quorum
present at tho meeting this morning and consequently did not vote on any
items on the agenda. I have attached a copy of our agenda for your review.
In discussions with the two members present it was agreed that items 3
through 9 on the agenda wore morely continuations of contracts that have already
been approved by the City Council and wore necessary items for the operation of
the computer, Also in those discussions it was agreed that items 1 and 2
were replacements for the contracts that wore in force last fiscal year with
these two firms at a reduction in the amount of the contract by $22,000
and $13,000 respectively,
Since the ordinance creating the Data Processing Board expires in November
of 1983, I polled the two members present asto their opinion on the
continuation of the Data Processing Advisory Board, Mr, Ron K Dade indicated
he felt the board should remain in existence and be called only on those
items of major significance, Mr, McDade expressed his concern that if an
item arose in which the Council felt the need for advice from the Data
Processing Advisory Board, it would be more expeditious if that Board was
in existence rather than a now board created, Mr, Dale %ddry expressed his
feeling that the Board has served out its useful purpose unless major items
such as new software packages or now equipment were brought to the Board
early in the evaluation period in order to take advantage of the Board's
experience and expertise,
At the August 10 meeting of the Data Processing Advisory Board when this
subject was first mentioned, Mr, Ray Pittman and Mr, Gerald Cardwell
expressed their opinion that the Data Processing Advisory Board had fulfilled
its useful life since the major hardware and software acquisitions had been
completed.
At both this mornings meeting and the prior meeting I expressed my feeling
that the Data Processing Board had performed a vital service to the City and
I personally felt they had been a great benefit to me and had served as an
Mom to Chris Mirtunp
Rli: Dnta Processing Advisory Board Mooting
Octobor 25, 1983
Page 2
important llnk between the City Council and the Data Procossing Dopartmont,
At both mootings X pollod the members on their willingness to serve another
torn amd Mr, Cnrdwol1, Mr, Maddry and Mr, McDade all indicated their
willingness to servo another term,
A410
qry` A. C Collins
Diroctor of Data Processing
GAC;co
1
AOFNDA
CITY OF DFNTON DATP. PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
October 25, 1983
Special called meeting of the City of Denton Data Processing
Advisory Board, Tuesday, October 25, 1983 at 700 a.m. at the
Ramada Inn Restaurant mooting room, Denton, Texas,
Monthly Annually
1, Priority Systems Contract $ $ 15,000,00
2. TRFS Contract 25,000,00
3, I.B.M, Software (lease) 1,626,00 19,512,00
4, I,B.M. Lease/purchase
of hardware 38,065,65
5. ITT Leann/purchaso and
maintenance on terminal 31297,50 391570.00
6, First Municipal Lease/purchase
of disks and tapes 2,852.00 34,224.00
7. I.B,M, Local Program Support 322.00 31864.00
8. Hardware Maintenance 31800.24 45,602.88
9. Computer Associates 705.00 8,460.00
PRIORITY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
1t00 O lglm l do,
,3rieuYr~y> .°~ums 75061
11.4/b'S9 0000
October 12, 1983
Mr, Gary Collins
Director of Data Processing
City of Denton
216 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Collins;
Thank you for the opportunity to be of continued service to you and
the City by providing programming support personnel for your computer
system. We will continue to provide IBM 4300 programming expertise
on an as-needed basis, This letter is to document our arrangement
with you.
We have assigned Mr. John Dyer as Project Manager and Me, Jerry
Osborne as System Programmer on your project, Other men will be made
available to you as you need them. Our fees will be based upon
actual time spent by these men plus out-of-pocket expenses. Our
billing rates for these men is $46,00 per hour. Travel expenses will
be at twenty cents ($0,20) per mile. The billing rate of $46,00 per
hour will be maintained through September 30, 1984, We will bill you
semi-monthly with payment terms of net ten days,
if this arrangement letter properly describes our arrangement with
you, please sign one copy and return it to me. Again, thank you for
the opportunity to serve you.
Very truly yours,
Daryl ,Cutler
Vice President Gary Collins
OCC/1kc
lwwod4x -VOA~
' CITY OF DENTON
CITY COUNCIL Aarmna prnr EST FORM*
DATE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 1, 1983
ITEM TO BE PLACED ON AGENDAI ~
1. Word item exactly as it is to be placed on agenda.
Include any Advisory Board Recoomendations,
2. List backup materials (to 14e submitted no later than
10:00 a,m. Thursday, prior to the council meeting,)
3. State the order in which the item needs to appear on
the agenda.
A contract with I'I1ES Corporation to nrovido programming support
to tho City of Denton on an as needed basis in tho areas of
the pnyroll/11cryonnol System known as "Pis" and the Utility Biliing
Systom known as "CIS,"
2 Memorandum to G, Chris 11artung, city Dfanager, in reference to
Data Processing Advisory Board Neeting held on Tuesday,
October 25, 1983
* THIS FORM IS TO BE SUBMITTED BY 10:00 A.M. OF THE
MONDAY OF THE WEETC PRIOR TO THE REGULAR COUNCIL
MEETING. ONLY ITEMS OF A CRITIC_ ..NATURE WILL BE
CCEPTED AFTER THIS TIME.
NOTE: Please use a separate request form'for each item
that is submitted..
Q
CfrYA/ DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE tare $66,8200
MEMORANDUM
TO; G, Chris Hartung, City Manager
EROI: Gary A, Collins, Director of Data Processing
DATE October 25, 1983
SU&MCP; DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEBTING
Unfortunately the Data Processing Advisory Board did not have a quorum
present at the meeting this morning and consequently did not vote on any
items on the agenda, 1 have attached a copy of our agenda for your review,
~~nn discussions with the two members present it was agreed that items 3
t. rough 9 on the agenda were merely continuations of contracts that have already
beon approved by the City Council and were no,:ossary items for the operation of
the computer. Also in these discussions it was agreed that items 1 and 2
by c $22,000 with
in t the h amount were of in the force contract fiscal
were replacements
rethe duction contracts
at f a for
these t
and $13,000 respectively,
Since the ordinance creating the Data Processing Board expires in November
of 1983, I polled the two members present as to their opinion on the
continuation of the Data Processing Advisory Board, Mr. Ron McDade indicated
he felt the board should remain in existence and be called only on those
items of major significance, Mr, McDade expressed his concern that if an
item arose in which the Council felt the need for advice from the Data
Processing Advisory Board, it would be more expeditious if that Board was
in existence rather than a new board created, Mr, Dale Maddry expressed his
feeling that the Board has served out its useful purpose unless major items
such as new software packages or new equipment were brought to the Board
early in the evaluation period in order to take advantage of the Board's
experience and expertise.
At the August 10 meeting of the Data Processing Advisory Board when this
subject was first mentioned, W. Ray Pittman and Mr, Gerald Cardwell
expressed their opinion that the Data-Processing Advisory Board had fulfilled
its useful life since the major hardware and software acquisitions had been
completed.
At'both this morning's meeting and the prior meeting I expressed my feeling
that Board I personallyafeltcthey had beenadgrea servandicehadtoservedthe and
Memo to Chris Hartung
JIB: Data Processing Advisory Board Meeting
October 25, 1983
Page 2
important link between the City Council anr' the Data Processing Department,
At both meetings T ppolled the members on their willingness to serve another
term and Mr. Cardwo 1, Mr, Maddry and Mr, McDade all indicated their
willingness to serve another term.
1 -
a~ 0 is
Director of Data Processing
GAC:ce
AOENDA
CT'M' cp U21TON DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
October 25, 1983
Special called meeting of the City of Denton Data Processing
Advisory Board, Tuesduy, October 25, 1983 at 700 a,m, at the
Ramada inn kestaurant meeting room, Denton, Texas,
Monthly Annually
1, Priority Systems Contract $ $ 15,000.00
2, TRBS Contract 25,000,00
3, I,B,M, software (lease) 11626,00 19,512,00
4, I,B,M, Lease/purchase
of hardware 38,065.65
5. ITT Lease/purchase and
maintenance on terminal 3,297.50 39,570,00
6, First Municipal Lease/purchase
of disks and tapes 2,852,00 341224,00
7, I,B,M, Local Program Support 322,00 3,864,00
8, Hardware Maintenanco 3,800.24 45,602,88
9, Computer Associates 705,00 81460,00
Minutes
Development Review Committee +
September 20, 1983
DRC Members Presenti Jerry Clark, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison,
Jack Gantry, Wayne Horsley, Fan McLaughlin,
Koorosh Olyai, Denise Spivey, Tommy Stone,
Sob Ticknor, Steve Brinkman, Tim Fisher,
Bob Hageman, Harlan Jefferson and Pablo Rubio
VII. Review of Property Disposition Carroll and-Highland
A. Engineering
1, Buyer of tract to pay for survey and when tract is sold, City
of Denton Purchasing Department shall include this in selling
contract,
2. Due to future possible expansion of Carroll - including free
turning lanes and intersections - Carroll Boulevard land should
be retained,
3. Consider protection of Carroll access by use of this land for parks,
future mass transit collection or other needed uses in high cost
land areas,
B, Water and Sewer
A line is present in this area but exact location has not been
determined,
C, Electric
No comment,
D. Building Inspection
No comment,
•E, Transportation Engineering
see comments under Engineering section,
F. Fire
No comment,
G. Parks and Recreation
Any property given up now would restrict development of strip park
as now exists on North Carroll Boulevard - recommend not disposing
of city property, ,
i
Minutes 1
Development Review Committee
Property Disposition Carroll
and Highland
September 20, 1983
Page 2
R. Lone Star Gas
No comment,
lo G.T.E.
No Comment,
J. Cox Cable '
No representative from this department was present
K, Planning and Community Development
A
Planning Department recommends retaining all land along Carroll
Boulevard for future traffic needs and urban design projects,
rsErioRn~~ro~rs ~ ~ 3 ~
DATE September 27, 1963
T0; David Ellison, Development Review Planner
C' FROM Jerry Clark, Senior Civil Engineer
R,E; Property Dispositions on Carroll Boulevard - Between
Petit Prairie and Highland - approximate sizes
Parcel #1 - Abuts Lots 1 and 21 - Cite Reference Block 321
Approximately - 145 60 ti 8700 Ft.2 t ,2 acre
Parcel 02 - Abuts Lots 14, 18, 22 - City Reference Block 321
i
Approximately - 125 x 65 n 8125
35 60 e 2100
120 x 60 7200
180 x(11_.45) 18900
36,325 Ft.2 r .83 acre
JC; lc
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY aHEET
MEETING DATE: November 1, 1983
SUBJBCTI Consider disposition of excess public
right-of-way along the oast side of Carroll
Boulevard between West Prairie and Highland
Street. (D-33)
BACKGROUND= This is an approximately 36,325 square foot
(.83 acre) arcel, Present zoningg is two
family (L-F~ classification. It is felt that
the parcel can be develol)ed in a en ent y.
This request raises similar issues to an addi-
tional one involving property to the north, but
it was submitted by Mr. Dale Irwin separately
in April, 1983. The Planning and Zonin Com-
mission first considered the property disposi-
tion in June, 1983 and unanimously recommended
approval with certain conditions {retention of
20 foot strip being primary condition). Staff
information was limited in June, and following
consideration of a request for office zoning to
the north which led to concerns regarding open
space and curb cuts, staff requested that the
Planning and Zoning Commission reconsider the
request at its meeting of September 28, 1983.
SUMMARY: The Planning and Zoning Commission considered
this disposition request of its meeting of
September 280 1983. Staff recommended that
the right-of-way be retained for the following
reasons;
1) Future planning of uotential widenin of
Carroll Boulevard. Planning and Zoning
omm ss on mem ers all generally agreed
that there is a minimal chance that Carroll
Boulevard will be widened in the future, but
recommended that a minimum 20' strip be re-
tained along the east line if the property
is disposed of.
i
(U-33)
Page 2
2) Provisions for open apaoe, green belt or
strip park along this section of Carroll
Boulevard consistent with the middle section
of Carroll Boulevard beginning near Panhandle
Street and extending further north.
Members of the Planning and 4on,tng Commission
discussed the merits and demerits of retain-
ing the right-of-way for the above purpose
extensively. One member of the commission
seemed to feel that open spade and greenbelt
considerations alone is justification for
retaining the right-of-way, The majority of
the commission did not appear, to share this
sentiment.
3) Retention of right-of-way provides Cho city
with more absolute control of curb outs
along this section of Carroll Boulevard,
Interest in office specifically, and other high
intensity type land uses along Carroll Boulevard
has heightened. Existing policies discourage
strip retail/commeroial uses and unrestricted
curb cuts along Carroll and other major thor-
oughfares, If a portion of the property is
disposed of retention of a 20' strip would be
one potential solution to the curb cut issue.
ACTION REQUIREDi Approve request with or without condition(s),
deny or table request.
RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval, by a vote of 6-1, at its meeting of
September 28, 1983 with the condition that a
20 foot strip of right-of-way be retained for
public use .
The Parks and Recreation Board has also re-
quested that it be permitted to present its
point of view to the City Council, and be
officially included in the recommendation
process on future cases that warrant involve-
ment. The Parks and Recreation board meets
on October 31, 1983 and minutes from their
meeting will hopefully be available at the
City council meeting.
(D-33
Page
ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve disposition with condition(s).
2 Approve disposition without condition(s),
3 Deny disposition.
4 Table for, future consideration.
ATTACHMENTS., 1 Map
2 April 19 1983 letter from Mr, Dale Irwin
3 June 30 1983 letter from Mr, Dnio Irwin
4 Planning and Zoning Commission winutes of
June 22, 1983
5) Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of
September 28 1983
6) Development Lview Committee minutes of
May 24, 1983
7) Develo went Review Committee minutes of
September 20, 1983
David EIT song
Development Review Planner
.
6 32
56' S0' 102.5
210'
9 16
~
}4 13 1 2 1 1 N
N
a 13 1 II to 15
50' 64' 64' 60' 102,5'
425.99' WEST PRAIRIE
I 75 100 100 50' 67
I r
2 3 4 5 n
r
I -
21 r
.o
W~
N
°J V
• n i •a
O '0, L~, e~ 75, Tb 170
m 60 o° 7 6 " Q.
Q ° eo g 22
+ 18 9 8
362.08' '
o p a~ t
Z 'o tt e,
10 0
q t t ~ I ~ 120
~ I70 _
~ 1 ' 'e~° 85' 95
f t ♦,.fO ,O 11 .2
~p tie 0 N N N
.m ;e t 6 o i N~ •h
°p p 14 13 - 12 I I, I I I 12
° o
0
419•i`' o' 0 ° 75' 75' 120'
rYwin hP~PrriSP~<fliln ~Pqu, HI
e0° 130.68 62' 60' SI' 67
o~eaQn o,
°
°oo'Oo ~ a a 2 3 4 1 5 1 r I
CIOq o
e y, u p ' 1
I18'
J 125
Ir G` n 4 b t ~ •O
,~3%~~f ~ Yt o I i 7 ,
,,Go c° 1 I•~ I 110'
D e t f f •M ~
t r
' 1 5 n Agency,
r,\ uran~
April 19, 1983
Mr. David Ptlison
Community Development Dept,
City of Denton
Denton, Texas 76201.
Dear David=
Plenso find attached a copy of a map of property located on the east
side of Carroll Boulevard and on the south of Nest Prairie. I purchased
the lot identified as the Of£enbacker Addition from Mr. Offenbacker, The
city owns the lot due north of my lot. This is approximately 60 X 90 feet.
They also own the property to the south which would be from 90' to less
than 75' depth and 140 or snore feet down Carroll,
I would be interested I.n purchasing either or both tracts to go with
my existing lot, My objective would be to build n duplex on the city lot
to the north of mine and probably a fourplex to the south, T would not
need a curb cuo as I would propose parking on the front part of the Offon-
bnckur lot with 4 units on the rear, There is an existing curb cut on the
Offenbacker lot. The front part of this lot measures 64 X 90 not counting
the city's approximate 20' frontage.
I request that this land be looked into with the possibility of the
city selling it. I would be interested in purchasing it if the land can
be used as I've described, Please advise me what steps should be taken.
Sincerely, 1
J
DALF: IRWIN
Dlrci
Xncf (1)
RECEIVED APR 2 1 1983
419 8, Carroll Blvd. 0 Denton, Texas 76201 0 817.566.0033
In , n Agency,
uran
tune l, tap?
('i,:y of 1'c'.uto:1
Can„~,Un i i:/ Pr Vn l oe!~~relt l: I`rt,L ,
ton
1, I1nv1 d
P(wordinn rllsvo.7i 117.011 OP t110 C' 410.L Ronlevard r?rore vl,rr south or Icy
offiec, l' 1lroul,l ]ilut to rull,e thr-, Vol 1.-,ipi tr pPOr,o!1n].I (li9cuas(x1 tlticl with
rr, ~rnc "or)- s, t..:irisF,rnt ('ii,v /t t.t;ornov, ,nul he advised rnr that t.t would be
in order Lo uitil:o this conilitlontil. ofl'or, lic inforrncd rte th1tt thr;, city could
roll the nron_crL;r on a puh.lle bit} bnsis;, or if tho tmcmrrl;,' i.;1 dn,eincA wnv-,nbl.e
dog, to wh1th or Lhn't it cott.ld be sold to Lim r>lmClAttr, nroj,orty mmers.
Phis deolsiOn 'ts e.}y,aretttl,v
1 would like to offn,r +l r+ per root for tho X 001 lot due noi,i,h of
the nffonbaclcer R(Wition (14" ntl;nciled), '.111'1 :I s Lhe mice thni, T Lucid for
t11e Offenbacker lend tm1 ~ roX11,10cly l ] 1
. ;ears v r"00 which ~ w t~ els9ume to
be a fair utico for all conceinrd. T vottld offer tlu~ grove f ~r"for au much
of the ntororty f:oint,, Louth Of the 0."fenhnc}'.r,. nddi.tion as can be utilized lJitr~NK
for bui.ldinf, a (luplr:x. T do not know the rronerty 01mensionFl ttouth of the Akcw-cj' "i.
nf1'enbnctcr.l• addition, but It ntobabl,y would be necessavy to cbtnin at least d-
70 to POI, At somF point Lh(-,_dct3)th vould become too shnllow. to nee, Tnere J c
would noed to be fit ]cant, 7r' depth whirll would nl.low P. kt1 deep building,
nlus 351 for front micl back sn,i,backs.
To utilize the property ib would nr^.d to be zoned 111nnned revelormeni;
A-9 ror the WAFtched rh'mving;, unless ;aomn other lettal rwrvls of develo?in(r the
property exi.nts. 1'r, i'orris ndv.ised the thea it would be in order to make this
offer cont.innOnt on Planned Nvelonmont zoning or other !ern,]. means of dovol..-
oning the property, This zottintt renuesi, would re(luire no ndditional curb nuts
on Cnrrol.l Boulevard as one alretuly existFl to Lite 6ffenbttclcer ]end, It 19 my
tatderstandinr^ that eater and sewer do exist to the Offenbneker lm(l ov If not
tbn city would iu•ovide it (9ce ettnched httor),
four nrisisi anco !,I arrveciated and T loot: foivard to worlcinq with you
and your starf on thls project,
S.hlcerely,
4t/1
AT.''', T r 1'Ii
Pit el RECEIVED JUN 0 01983
419 S, Carroll Blvd. 0 Denton, Texas 76201 0 817.666.0033
mIoutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
June 22, 1983
Page 11
Mr. EsCUe moved to approve the preliminary replat of
lot 2, block A, Freeway Park Subdivision, and to recom-
mend approval of the final replat of lot 2, block A,
Freeway Park Subdivision. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne
and unanimously carried. (7-0)
111. Considerations
A. Discussion of Evers Park football scoreboard.
Mr. Ellison explained that the Denton zoning ordinance
does not permit advertising of any kind in an agricul-
tural district. Most of parks in city, including Evers
Park, are zoned agricultural. He further stated that
Willie Hudspeth, Commissioner of Boy's Tackle Football
Association, nas been working with potential advertisers
and sponsors to erect three scoreboards. He contacted
staff and was advised that either zoning ordinance would
have to be changed or he would have to request a change
in zoning. Item was considered by City Council and they
concurred with staff recommendation that Mr. Hudspeth be
allowed to request planned development zoning for adver-
tising signs in Evers Park for three scoreboards and
that advertising be limited to certain businesses. On
question, he said that alcoholic or tobacco related
businesses would not be allowed to advertise. Three
football fields, each with one scoreboard, would be
involved.
Chairman commented he felt it would be advisable to have
all parks in a Park zoning. He further stated that Park
board approved the concept, that it was his understand-
ing that advertising would consist of a statement saying
this scoreboard was donated by name of advertiser. He
questioned whether there would be any legate problems.
Mr. Watkins said that a formal request would come back
to Commission and specific conditions could be attached
at that time. Mr. Ellison advised that no decision is
required at this time, that staff is suggesting that
Commission endorse concept.
After discussion, Commission endorsed concept of a
planned development at Evers Park for the scoreboards.
B. rConsider disposition of city owned property located
along the east side of Carroll Boulevard between
West Prairie and Highland Streets. (D-33)
Mr. Ellison explained that this property was acquired
for Carroll right-of-way, that it is left over prop-
erty. Development Review Committee reviewed request,
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
June 22, 1983
Page 1.2
there a e no public facilities in place and there is no
particular reason from a technical point of view why the
city should retain this property, he continued there
has been some discussion within the Planningg and Commun-
ity Uevelopment Department that this could be maintained
as a nice, green space area but there has been a push
within the last year to dispose of excess property to
eliminate maintenance cost,
fie further expplained that 21! zoning is in place. The
property to the north is felt to have individual devel-
opment potential; the area to the south is questionable,
there is a possibility of development of one duplex.
Petitioner is proposing to take cityy owned property, if
acquired, and the existing Offenbacher property and re-
plat into one lot, He would then request planned devel-
opment (PD) zoning to develop duplexes and onu fourplex,
with a curb cut on Carroll.
Chairman said he felt developer should be required to
take all of the property from Highland to alley, not
just developable property.
Mr. bidor agreed that all property that city has no
further use for should be put up for bid.
Earl Jones pointed out that the city retains a wide
easement along Carroll Boulevard,
Mr. Clark advised that a 20 root strip would be retained
for right-of-way for Carroll Boulevard.
Mr. Sidor moved to recommend that all of property along
Carroll in this vicinity, that is of no use to city, be
put up for sale. Seconded by Mr. Escue ands unanimously
L carried. (7-0)
C. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Apple Creek
Addition.
Mr. Ellison explained that this is a 15.5 acre tract
located on the south side of East McKinney between
Woodrow and Mack Park, zoning is multi-family and multi-
family land use is anticipated. he said water and sewer
plans and'drainage plans will be submitted at final
platting sta e; preliminary plat requirements have been
met and Uevelopment Review Committee recommends approval.
Ms. Cole moved to approve preliminary plat of the Apple
Creek Addition. Seconded by Ms. Mays and unanimously
carried. (7-0)
P & Z Millutes
September 28, 1983
Page 12
Brian Burke, engineer, stated he was retained to design
the roads, storm drainage, sewer and water lines and that
at his first realization that they had not gone through a
platting process, advised them to look into the new subdi-
vision requirements. The roads he worked the designs on,
were on separate tracts of land from the school building
tract. When he completed his design on the access roads
he submitted his plans for approval,
in response to a question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Ellison
said he was not sure what would happen if the commissioners
denied the request other than no building permits would be
issued.
Mr. Clark stated there is no reason to shut down the
project as the streets and sewer are being inspected as
it goes. He said the plans were presented to engineer-
ing 'piecemeal' but not in any manner whereby it could
be reviewed by the Development Review Committee fully and
under the normal procedures for review of all departments.
Ms. Cole asked if the project was a private development
would the recommendation be to shut it down. ,
Mr. Pearson asked for an answer to the same question posed
by Ms. Cole.
Mr. Ellison stated that probably the private developer
would not have reached this stage of development.
Basically what the problem is here is a total viola-
tion of procedures. Everything has been reviewed and
is satisfactory at this time, however, it can be denied
based on the fact that they have not followed the normal
procedures.
1Ms. Cole moved for a recommendation to approve the
preliminary and final plat of lot 1, block 1, D.I.S.D.
Elementary School Addition with the recommendation that
in the future correct procedures be followed. Seconded '
by Mr. Escue. Motion carried unanimously 7-0.
H. (consider disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard right-
of-way between West Prairie and Highland Streets, (D-33)
and
1. Consider disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard right-
of-way at the northeast corner of West Prairie Street and
Carroll Boulevard. (D-35)
P & Z Minutes
September 28, 1983
Page 13
Mr. Ellison stated there has been additional input from
the Parks and Recreation Department with regard to this
disposition of property. He explained the reason for the
delay has been due to the problem of surveying the subject
property, which is needed to determine the amount of land
area there is, the city would incur the cost of the survey
up front. However, he stated that staff feels a need to
retain all of the right-of-way for the following reasons;
l) Future planning of widening Carroll Boulevard
2) Parks and Recreation feels there is a need for an open
space greenway area on Carroll
3) To maintain control of curb cuts along Carroll
staff is recommending not to sell any of Carroll Boulevard
.property.
The property disposition at Carroll and Highland (D-35) is
approximately 8700 square feet and cannot be developed
independently as is unless re-zoned to a classification
that does not have a minimum lot width requirement - it is
currently zoned 2-F,
Mr. Fisher stated the city would need an easement from the
new property owner if sold.
Mr. Sidor said he felt he would go along with the Parks
and Recreation comments and the Development Review
Committee recommendation to retain this property for
future use as a greenway area.
Mr. Juren stated if the greenway area is the only real
consideration for retaining then he would go along with
the disposal of the property.
Mr. Pearson stated he felt Carroll Boulevard is a major
thoroughfare and there are tremendous economic forces to
develop all the way down like University, Planning and
Zoning can through a regulatory process try to inhibit
this.
Mr. Ellison explained that staff bases their decision on
the Development Review Guide which has been approved by
the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council and
Citizen Committee representatives.
P & Z Minutes
September 28, 1983
Page 14
Mr. Irwin stated it is the city's practice to maintain a
20 foot strip up and down Carroll, he thinks their reason
being to limit curb cuts. He mentioned he does not know
how the Parks and Recreation Department can maintain any
additional parks area in the city than what they have at
this time. He feels the 20 feet would be adequate for any
city purposes along Carroll and also thinks a private
owner would probably maintain a greenway area better than
a city park could be maintained.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval for
disposition of D-33 and D-35 with a 20 foot right-of-way
to be retained by the city along Carroll Boulevard.
Seconded by Mr. Pearson. Vote was called Ayei 6 votes
Nay: 1 vote (Mr. Sidor) Motion carried. (6-1)
J. New Business.
No new business was presented.
Meeting adjourned 7;30 p.m.
Minutes
Development Review Committee
Kay 24, 1983
Staff Present) Jerry Clark, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison,
Denise Sppivey, Tommy Stone David Ham, and
Ernie TuMs
1. Review of property disposition on east side of Carroll
Boulevard, south of West Prairie Street.
A. Engineering
If property is disposed of, city should retain 20' back of
the curb for Carroll Boulevard right-of-way,
B. Water and Sewer
No lines present on tAs property.
C. Electric
No lines present on this property.
D. Building Inspection
No comment.
E. Traffic
No representative from this department was present.
F. Fire
No representative from this department was present,
0. Parks and Recreation
No representative from this aepartmont was present,
H, Lone Star Gas
Gas line is located along east side of Carroll Boulevard.
0
M1 nu tea
Development Review Committoe
Property Disposition (Carroll Blvd)
May 24, 1983 ,
Page 2
1. G.T.E.
No representative from this department was present,
J. Golden Triangle Communications
No representative from this department was present.
K. Planning and Community Development
1. Development Review Committee not opposed to disposition
of property, provided that a 20' strip back of the curb
on Carroll Boulevard be retained for right-of-way pur-
poses.
2. Request will be submitted to Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council for a determination.
Minutes
Development Review Committee
September 20, 1983
DRC Members Present; Jerry Clark, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison,
Jack Gentry, Wayne Horsley, Don McLaughlin,
Koorosh Glyai, Denise Spivey, Tommy Stone,
Bob Tickner, Steve Brinkman, Tim Fisher,
Bob Hageman, Harlan Jefferson and Pablo Rubio
V1. Review of Property Disposition - West Prairie and Carroll
A, Engineering
1, If approved, buyer of tract must pay for survey when tract is
sold. City of Denton Purchasing Department shall include this
in selling contract.
2. Due to future possible expansion of Carroll Boulevard - including
free turning lanes, and intersections - Carroll Boulevard land should
be retained,
3. Consider protection of Carroll . access by use of this land for parks,
future mass transit collection or other needed uses in high cost land
areas,
B. Water and Sewer
A liqe is present in the area but exact location has not been
determined,
C. Electric
No comment.
D. Building Inspection
No comment.
E, Transportation Engineering
Please refer to comments under Engineering section.
F. Fire
No comment.
G. Parks and Recreation
Any property given up now would restrict development of strip park
as is now located on North Carroll Boulevard.
Pli.nuto s
Devolopment Review Committee
Property Disposition - West Prairie
and Carroll
September 20, 1983
Page 2
R, Lone Star Gas
No comment,
No comment,
J. Cox Cable
No representative from this department was present,
N. Planning and Community Development
Planning Department recommends retaining,all land along Carroll
Boulevard for future traffic needs and urban design projects,
BACKYUPO SUN Y SHEET
MEETING DATE: November 1, 1983
SUBJECT: Consider disposition of excess Carroll
Boulevard right-of-way beginning at the
southeast corner. of West Prairie Street and
Carroll Boulevard. (D-35)
BACKGROUND= The City of Denton acquired right-of-way for
widening and improvements to the above ref-
erenced section of Carroll Boulevard in the
mid 7018, 't'otal right-of-way width for Carroll
Boulevard is 140 feet. Initially, forty feet
of
O40') of 9tzeet.waAnexisted
additional 100 feet form
right-of-way was acquired from adjoining
landowners for the aforementioned improve-
ments.Presently, Carroll Boulevard is a six
(6) lane primary arterial with pavement width
and median width totalling eighty feet (801).
This disposition request was initiated when the
property owner to the east requested a change
in zoning from two family (2-F) to the office
(0) classification in July, 1983. Field notes
for the above request included property that
staff feels is actually city property. After
considerable discussion by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council the zoning
change request was denied by the City Council
with direction to the petitioners and prospec-
tive developer to consider planned development
(PD) zoning. A planned development (PD) site
plan was submitted after City Council action
was taken on the office zonin~ request. The
site plan again included a 40 strip of prop-
erty believed to be public right-of-way. The
petitioners were told that a site plan and
planned development (PD) request including
public property cannot be accepted until the
right-of-way disposition issue is resolved.
1 1 ~
(A-35}
Page 22
SUMMA Yt The Planning and 4onin8 Commission considered
this disposition request of its meeting of
September 280 1983, Staff recommended that the
right-of-way be retained for the following
reasons;
1) Future alarming of uotential widenin of
Carroll Boulevard, Planning an on ng
amm ss on mem er,s all generally agreed that
there is a minimal chance that Carroll
Boulevard will be widened in the future, but
recommended that a minimum 20' strip be re-
tained along the east line if the property
is disposed of,
2) Provisions for open space, green bolt or
strip park along this section of Carroll
Boulevard consistent with the middle section
of Carroll Boulevard beginning near Panhandle
Street and extending further north.
Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission
discussed the merits and demerits of retain-
ing the right-of-way for the above purpose
extensively, One member of the commission
seemed to feel that open space and greenbelt
considerations alone is justification for
retaining the right-of-way. The majority of
the commission did not appear. to share this
sentiment,
3) Retention of right-of-way provides the city
with more absolute control of curb cuts
along this section of Carroll Boulevard.
Interest in office specifically, and other high
intensity type land uses along Carroll Boulevard
has heightened. Existing policies discourage
strip retail/commercial uses and unrestricted
curb cuts along Carroll and other major
thoroughfares. If a portion of the property is
disposed of,retention of a 20' strip would be
one potential solution to the curb cut issue.
lip-35~
age 3
No official survey has been taken of tine
sub,jecL property, however, the en ineer.i.n~
department has estimated that it s a 1AA5 x
' (8700 square feet) strip of land, The
strip of property could possibly be developed
independently if the following occurs;
1) Disposal of the entire parcel with existing
two family (2-F) zoning; would permit
residential development (minimum lot size
required for legally platted residential lot
is 60' x 1001).
2) Re-zoning of the traot to a non-residential
classification would permit development on
the parcel so long as a minimum of thin
feet Y
(30') of street frontage is available.
(Retaining a 20 foot strip would make resi-
dential development more difficult under
existing zoning but; would not affect develop-
ment potential if a non-residential classifi-
cation is granted.)
Property with independent development potential
must be opened up for public bid. Property
that is not independently developable only
re uires negotiation between the city and
ad anent landowners.
ACTION REQUIRED: Determine development potential of property and
approve, deny, or table disposition request
with or without conditions.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
that the excess right-of-way be disposed of
with the condition that a '20' strip be retained
for public use by a vote of 6-1.
The Park and Recreation board has expressed a
desire to be included in the official recom-
mendation process when disposition requests
affecting property with significant park, open
space or beautification potential is being
considered. Staff has been informed that the
Parks and Recreation Department will provide
the Council with information on tho.ir feelings
toward this request after considering the issue
at its October 31, 1983 meeting. Since Planning
and Zoning action was taken, the Citizen Traffic
Safety Commission has also expressed a desire
to comment on the curb cut issue, but their
meeting will not occur before November 1, 1983.
(p"35)4
Fag
s
ALTERNATIVESi 1 Approve disposition with condition(s),
2 Approve disposition without condition(s).
3 Deny request,
4 Table for future consideration,
ATTACHMENTS; 1)) Map
2) Lotter, requesting disposition
3 Planning and 2on.ng Commission minutes of
September 28, 1983
4) Devolo~ment Review Committee minutes of
Septet er 20, 1983
5) Memorandum from Jerry Clark, Senior Civil
Engineer
David E11ison -6---
Development Review planner
C 3 1p 4I 5 6 7 g I G
210' ~ ~8 50' 02.4 In kn
~s 32 s I6
40,
0 r » " 14 13 12 11
N o`1$ " 13 1 11 10 N 15
50' 64' 64' 60' 118 102
425.99 WEST PRAiRiE
75 100 100 50 57
0
M
2
> 3 4 5 , ~
N
A/j~
7
~i1 I C
21
.O
rr
< L` c Q \ 75' 75' 170
CC ' 7 i 6 ONA.
c I
Y,,O 80 ° 22
0
V~ 18 6i- i 9 8 10 h
` X6208' ,
a ~
r
10 C)
l 321
` 170,
`nom i 1, 2
14 13 12 11,1 II. 12
o °
o d o°o~ ~ o o
20'
75' 75' 60, 1 n,
419,1'
Hl
10.66 62' 60' I 51' I 67' 85
iiUC (~p 'Oa I `I If`
d °V~Q°r. I 7° 1 i 1
a < ~os{c
jr, ~ , o 128
September 91 1983
Mr, David Ellison
Planning and Community Development Department
City pf Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mr. Ellison-
I would appreciate your expdeiting the disposition of property
on Prairie Street through whatever process is necessary for the
City of Denton, We have obtained financing from the First State
Dank to repay the City the amount which was paid by the City for
this property,
Respectfully,
rJ/
RECEIVED SEP 0 9 13"3
~~Y & z Minutes
September 28, 1983
Page 12
Brian Burke, engineer, stated he was retained to design
the roads, storm drainage, sewer and water lines and that
at his first realization that they had not gone through a
platting process, advised them to look into the new subdi-
vision requirements, The roads he worked the designs on,
were on separate tracts of land from the school building
tract. When he completed his design on the access roads
he submitted his plans for approval.
In response to a question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Ellison
said he was not sure what would happen if the commissioners
denied the request other than no building permits would be
issued.
Mr. Clark stated there is no reason to shut down the
project as the, streets and sewer are being inspected as
it goes. He aid the plans were presented to engineer-
ing 'piecemeal' but not in any manner whereby it could
be reviewed by the Development Review Committee fully and
under the normal procedures for review of all departments,
Ms. Cole asked if the project was a private development
would the recommendation be to shut it down.
Mr. Pearson asked for an answer to the same question posed
by Ms. Cole,
Mr. Ellison stated that probably the private developer
would not have reached this stage of development.
Basically what the problem is here is a total viola-
tion of procedures. Everything has been reviewed and
is satisfactory at this time, however, it can be denied
based on the fact that they have not followed the normal
procedures.
Ms. Cole moved for a recommendation to app-4ove the
preliminary and final plat of lot 1, block 1, D.I.S.D.
Elementary School Addition with the recommendation that
in the future correct procedures be followed. Seconded
~-bby Mr. Escue. Motion carried unanimously 7-0.
H.( Consider disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard right-
of-way between West Prairie and Highland Streets. (D-33)
and '
1. Consider disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard right-
of-way at the northeast corner of West Prairie Street and
Carroll Boulevard.- (D-35)
P & Z MinuCcs '
September 28, 1983
Page 13
Mr. Ellison stated there has been additional input from
the Parks and Recreati n Department with regard to this
disposition of property. He explained the reason for the
delay has been due to the problem of surveying the subje:-t
property, which is needed to determine the amount of land
area there is, the city would incur the cost of the survey
up front. However, he stated that staff feels a need to
retain all of the right-of-way for the following reasons;
1) Future planning of widening Carroll Boulevard
2) Parks and Recreation feels there is a need for an open
space greenway area on Carroll
3) To maintain control of curb cuts along Carroll
Staff is recommending not to sell any of Carroll Boulevard
property,
The property disposition at Carroll and Highland (b-35) is
approximately 8700 square feet and cannot be developed
independently as is unless rezoned to a classification
that does not have a minimum lot width requirement - it is
currently zoned 2-F.
Mr. Fisher stated the city would need an easement from the
new property owner if sold.
Mr. Sidor said he felt he would go along with the Parks
and Recreation comments and the Development Review
Committee recommendation to retain this property for
future use as a greenway area.
Mr. Juren stated if the greenway area is the only real
consideration for retaining then he would go along with
the disposal of the property. 4
Mr. 'Pearson stated he felt Carroll Boulevard is a major
thoroughfare and there are tremendous economic forces to
develop all the way down like University; Planning and
'Zoning can through a regulatory process try to inhibit
this.
Mr. Ellison explained that staff bases their decision on
the Development Review Guide which has been approved by
the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council and
Citizen Committee representatives.
P & 4 Minutes
September 28, 1983
Page 14
Mr. Irwin stated it is the city's practice to maintain a
20 foot strip up and down Carroll, he thinks their reason
being to limit curb cuts. He mentioned he does not know
how the Parks and Recreation Department can maintain any
additional parks area in the city thA n what they have at
this time. He feels the 20 feet would be adequate for any
city purposes along Carroll and also thinks a private
owner would probably maintain a greenway area better than
a city park could be maintained.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval for
disposition of D-33 and D-35 with a 20 foot right-of-way
to be retained by the city along Carroll Boulevard.
Seconded by Mr. Pearson. Vote was called Aye: 6 votes
Nay: 1 vote (Mr. Sidor) Motion carried. (6-1)
J. New Business.
No new business was presented.
Meeting adjourned 7:30 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE; November 1, 1983
SUBJECT; Approval of the proposed annexation of approxi-
mately 35,66 acres of land located along the
south side of Hickory Creek Road and west of
F.M. 2181, (Z-1609)
SUMMARY; A preliminary plat has been approved on 17,5
acres located on the south side of Hickory
Creek Road in the extra territorial jurisdic-
tion (ETJ). Annexation of the proposed sub-
division requires coming from our city limit
located in the right-of-way of F.M. 2181 with
a 500 foot wide strip beginning on the south
side of Hickory Creek Road and extending in a
wosterly direction to the subdivision,
The proposed land use is single family resi-
dential on 32 lots which average approximately
18,000 square feet, The residential dwellings
will probably be some type of manufactured
housins. The developer intends to serve the
subdivision with well water, and septic systems
will be used for sewage disposal.
The internal sCreets will be constructed to
county standards and the developer ttas agreed
to dedicate a minimum of 50 feet of right-of-
way from the center line of Hickory Creek Road.
The Planning and Community Development
Department staff has previously indicated
misgivings regarding annexation in this area
due to cost of service considerations.
In this case the Utilities Department would
like this property annexed because of waste
water disposal concerns.
ACTION REQUIRED; Hold a public hearing; no other action is
required.
Z-1609
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES: 11 Take no action
2, Discontinue annexation procedings
3. Reduce the size of the area proposed for
annexation
RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of annexation,
EXHIBITS; 1, Maps
2, Memorandum from Director of Utilities
3. Service plan
4, Prop arty owner list
5. Reply form totals
6. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of October 12, 1983.
imA es S. Watkins
Senior Planner
RYAN RR
-.:---ROBINSON -RD
!
Ij 1
~I W"1609
HICKORY CREEK AR_._ I i
I~
rf-~-
dd ~ it
II 1,
f
I
MOW), --"rrrc K 0A
cA ST
e t 'lotj l1J.,
M
N
! 4 4 or3C " Core a Corrc c (^r/
e ~ e
c g coral 4 Cor /e (or /fr (.r z a
NlAI
ise r• / ,v.~ ra
a o , 0 1 0 Y
~ Cel'je ♦ ♦ Cer lS (0 L1\ g~ ~ ; ler!
o t " o~ ` f / e
Y COT" t'1 g ~ ,nT90. Cam!' r1 $''rl ~ (.r' I ,i
~ u~t cwt ~ ~ I t
♦ o r a / q q e
ter Z~ Cat'n p g (eYf ; .
o CorE.d t 1
o
qjl,
lilt IArt t S L r:
e ~ 4
0 fi e'N
I is' too',
erT C
e', t ALerva 4 .'J" r11,Jl
Lo, w
h. oa1
Its ~
VICINITY NAf+
r•e+ to teat
CITYaf DxwoN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL $UILDING/ 06NTON, TEXAS 76201 TPLdPHON£ (817) 566,8200
M R M 0 R A N D U M
TO: CHARLES WATKINS; SR, PLANNER
FROM: R. G. Nelson, Director of Utilities
DAM October 5, 1983
RE: Hickory Creek Plains Subdivision
The purpose of this memo is to specifically express the
utility Department's concern regarding the Hickory Creek Plains
Subdivision's proposed utility services, but it applies in gbneral
to aan~nrr remote development in the City of Dentonts extraterritorial
jurisdiction, Furthermore, this is not just a City of Denton
Utility Department concern, it is a concern of utility,
environmental and planning personnel of all the cities in the
Metroplex area. I am presently serving on two different task forces
that are addressing some of these problems. One task force was
created by the North Central Texas Council of Governments' Water
Resources Council to explore the concerns of the proliferation of
remote subdivisions throughout the Metroplex area which are
depleting the ground water supply and polluting the streams and
lakes with inadequate sewage collection and water treatment, The
other task force was established by the Water Users Committee
representing the City of Dallas and its nineteen customer cities.
The purpose of this task force is to establish the criteria by which
water will be sold from the City of Dallas' system to outlying rural
type developments considering their inherent sewage collection and
treatment problems.
The three main concerns tha City of Denton has to such
developments are as follows:
1. Use of groundwater:
Rural subdivisions often have to drill wells and use
ground water. This causes a depletion of the scarce
groundwater resource. There is a concentrated effort
by the Texas Department of Water Resources to
encourage communities, developments and rural water
districts to secure a surface water supply and save
the ground water supplies for widely scattered
agriculturally-based users.
2538U
Charles Watkins Memo-October 5, 1983
Page 2
2, Sewer disposals
Remote developments often require the use of septic
systems which have a history of failing after a few
years of service, Raw sewage is then allowed to run
into our streams and lakes and cause pollution,
Although Health Department laws are in43ndad to
control this pollution, area courts fail to prosecute
offenders, Invariably, the remote subdivisions then
seek assistance through Federal, state or local
assistance programs or a local municipality to oome in
and help them finance the construction of collection
systems to assist in alleviating the problem that
wasulini tiatedeen Allkeno faathese sot tionse throwspmthe
burden over to other tax payers,
The second problem with these septic systems is that
water that is discharged through the septic system is
not collected and sent to a central treatment plant
where it can then be recycled back into a useable
water resource, This also depletes the water
resources which are scare in the Texas area,
3. Future development costs;
The general history of such remote subdivisions is
that after the properties are sold to the second or
third owners, the people begin to want and expect some
of the amenities available in the neighboring cities
and communities, Political pressure is then applied
to have the area annexed and immediately requests are
made to extend utility services to these areas, The
utility must then incur substantial costs in extending
the sewer collection lines and the water distribution
lines to the subdivisions plus install the local
collection and distribution lines,
Although pro-rata charges are collected for these
lines, they rarely cover the actual cost to install
and, therefore, are subsidized by the other rate
payers in the existing incorporated city. This
subsidy in large part comes from property owners and
rate payers who have usually had to pay for their own
water lines and sewer lines in front of their own
homes as part of the purchase price of their home and
now are being asked to subsidize installation of the
water and sewer facilities in the remote development
where the property owners in that area have not had to
pay for the appropriate water and sewer lines.
2538U/2
1
Charles Watkins Memo-Oatober 5, 1983
Page 3
In addition, remote subdivisions, such as proposed in this
particular case, foster "leap frog' type development which is much
more expensive to operate and maintain than well-coordinated
developments closer to the rest of the community. In the City of
Denton 'a case, there are substantial properties interior to the city
limits which are in relatively close proximity to utility services
which are already in place and are presently under utilized.
The City of Denton's subdivisions Rules and Regulations do
establish that, alternative water systems and sewer systems can be
utilized providing certain criteria are met. The City of Denton, of
course, is operating under those subdivision rules and regulations
and will approve such utility services, but it is hoped that the
above-listed concerns are taken into consideration by all parties
who are responsible for planning, developing and approving such
remote sudivison developments.
Yours very truly,
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
2538U/3-gcr
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNI3XVD AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS
WHIMAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by thr governing body of a oity prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the Cityy of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as sktown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of servioe;
I, Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 1:906 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation,
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
11, streets
(1) ilmorgency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, meaaures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
Will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city,
d, Inspection Services
(1) Any i;tspection services now provided by the city
(builcting, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annex anion,
11. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
T, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installer in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordunce with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L, Iliscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II. Capil:<iI Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
datod ye;trly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
11es as
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics,
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will 'oe no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city,
7
r /~(aslrac 1 1315 7ret 1 A ~aiy ~lrrv~~ l l~ pop, Z✓rs1+~K p/art~
P4, H 6 /13ox bo'llon Uaol
r
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS }
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1609
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
(10/18)
None Received None Received
{11/1) None Received None Received
P&4 Minutes'
October 12, 1983
Page 6
Mr. Pearson stated he thinks a planned development
should be an important consideration.
Mr.. Sidor commented he is concerned that if approved it
would be opening the whole area to commercial devel-
opment and it is a residential area of low intensity and
would be opposed to the rezoning.
Mr. Escue made a motion to deny Z-1614, Mr., Claiborne
ueconded. Vote was called Aye - 5
I.aFor.te) Motion carried 5-2, Nay - 2 (Juren and
III, Considerations
A. !Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
35.66 acres of land located along the south side of
(UNAPPROVED) Hickory Creek Road and west of F.M. 2181, (2.1609)
Mr. Watkins displayed a map showing area to be annexed
outlining area to the commission and public. He stated
this is 17.5 acres, with preliminary approval by
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, the
developer is proposing 32 lots, septic systems and well
water will serve the subdivision, streets will be built
to county standards, if annexed into city internal
streets would be required to be built to city standards,
Mr. Sidor questioned if sewer lines are in the area does
the developer have to tie onto them.
Mr. Fisher said at this time there are no sewer lines
they would have to be constructed to the property.
Mr. WP.tkins explained if the development is+within 200
feet of the line the developer would have to extend and
tie on.
Mr. Claiborne asked how far away is the line?
Mr: Fisher stated 1000 feet.
Mr. Watkins stated the Development Review Committee
recommends approval of Z-1609.
Mr, Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1609,
seconded by Mr.. Juren. Vote called Aye - 6
Nay - 1 (Escue)
Motion .-arried 6-1.'
BACK-UP CITY OS U *1"YGSHEET
MEETING DATE: Novomber. 1, 1983
SUBJECT: Approval of the proposed annexation of approxi-
mately 1014,4 acres of land located south of
Highway 380 and west of 1-35, (Z-1610)
SUMMARY: Annexation of this area presents the oppor-
tunity to control land use, to have subdivi-
sions ovnstructed in accordance with city
standards, to require developer participation
♦ in improvements to perimeter roads, and to
apply building code standards,
Size: Approximately 1014.4 Acres
Land Use: Approximately 5 Dwellings,
Selwyn School, and Agri-
cultural Uses
Land Use Plan: High/Moderate Employment
and Commercial Center
Population: 56
Transportation: Area is served by 1-35,
Highway 380, FM 1515,
Airport, Railroad (spur
under construction).
Masch Branch Road and
Jim Christal Road bifur-
cates the area. West Loop
288 is planned to serve
the area in the future.
Existing Utilities: I. Hickory Creak Sewer
2. 16" Waterline in
Airport Road
3, Airport Substation
under construction
Z-1610
Page 2
SUMMARY
(Continued); Planned utilities: 1. 1984 - 10" Sewer Line
on Highway 380 (Mesa
to Hickory Creek .Line)
2. 1984 - 10' Airport
Sewer Line (Airport to
Hickory Creek)
3. 1985 - 16" South Bonnie
Brae Waterline (Air ort
Road to Bonnie Brae
4. 1987 - Additional
Transformer for Airport
Substation
5. 1987 - Airport
Perimeter Waterline
Project.
The population is concentrated at Selwyn School
or, along Highway 380. Provision of city ser-
vices to this area would not be a significant
burden at dhis time given the relatively sparse
development and the fact that services are cur-
rently being provided to surrounding areas.
This area has the highest development potential
of all areas reviewed because of transportation
facilities and infrastructure.
ACTION REQUIRED; Hold a public hearing; no other action is
required.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action
2. Reduce the size of the annexation
3. Disapprove annexation
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
EXHIBIT: 1. Map
2. Service Platt
3. Property owner list
4. Reply form totals
5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of October 12) 1983
Al A
Charles Watkins 'S o Senior Planner
Lr -4
Z Ir~A
hlnri✓Rd, • r
i
• . , Muscn I • 1
Radecke Rd. Mooch
to
• 9 Rd r • Stanch Rd
M1ti; arlh td Rd • a
.
36 PA'S tl, ;DENTON
I ' ~r i •
POP 19,874 -
MIR 11 y3 • co
'RUM of a \ * I • • - I
v E e i • 3
POP a54 , a -j
1 I\ `u O c a ^ '1 r
a l ok Rd I - M
a d ~J u
f a c k oon Rd, , • tea. ^
/.t v S • J o , i I ~ i
~ r • • G ° d 0 • 'y i O .r
',,cam' f
` BOA ? U.J 4 • • ' ~f
i
ILM ~ ~x - - S ° ' it ~#-.-J~~~~ r~ ra
~Jlnf Chrl-~I 'RQ ' ~'1,• • t
4.6
.
7. 5 N I I e e Rd»0 of e t i
r~ HMI ..J~ O :•y0.S ~.a.. I.`y
CAS
ile Rd Yom . 0 01 e/40. J 22 r515:. rte/
f
35 0
CL a rla .sideRJ` r' / ar f
~Yx Rd,' u
e . •ROSb dw CIm, Rd.
b
4 FAS
r F OC - tt ,
~7rrJt:y[: sJK 2449 - Bo Bro Rd'.
I~ ~ Y ~ 7r Bpi ~
'LI ely l' Rd.
rtr d It 1BrOnfh • • '~Ir•
_ 0~ . m • . Lone
00 f ' r J Sr0° • . Ryon d
l / r ~~;'1(
lJ cot r~~rn ~ a 7
r /
P,LOr KNOB/ pdo% rBrueh:44" k Add ' "Y• CreeY~
e 038' Johnson n <P' yS~-
Ird Rd
a too
~wNORTMLA'E` o
a POP 20 U e a G d ~ ~ ~C
cs Crawford Rd. •Cror oJe0`9ra 1~JJ-7^-, v
-61
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS) the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1, Pursunnt to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service,
I, Basic Service Plan
A, Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
page two
F, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
`he effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be aocomplished under the established
policie of the city,
G, Inspection Services '
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H, Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
T, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed In the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L, MiseelIaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as;
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, e8tablished
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics,
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longed than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
-Als Ma
I 4A
~b !b k ~ • '76 ~
it
It
r
r
l 1V n' `FiK
,ZA
/ Uniy_vrs, 1, 6Pn4,4n 76 bn!
7r t
Ora .f J Xn l
15 A
lY T r
J r
r ~ , 4
It
r l
it It
r
rr
r ~
- if
A, 4
~ r
,
J
~ ~1
z
,w ~ 3
_
Tr t N
_
~ u ,
-
.col
~ -
_ y ,
J .
e~
_ .
_ . .
PROPERi^l OWNER REPLY FMIS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1610
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
(10/18)
None Received Margaret Weaver Russell
902 Easy; Randall
Beeville, Texas 78102
(512) 358-5970
(11/1)
None Received 1 Richard C Durham
Betty Durham
Margaret Russell
Scott Russell
B. C. Weaver
Velma Edith Weaver
by George Hopkins
First State Bank Bldg,
Denton, Texas
10
N(4 Minutes
0ct6ber, 12, 1983
Page 7
B. 'Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
1.0?4.4 acres of land located south of H±ghway 380 and
west of 1.35. (Z-1.610)
Mr. Watkins stated this area is currently surrounded by
the City of Denton, He explained there are 56 people
(UNAPPROVHD) living in the area, predominately around Selwyn School.
Staff recommends approval because this area has poten-
tial for development, utilities are planned for the area
for 1984-85. The area has a major transportation system
easily accessible, railroad tracks are available in the
area and with the planned utilities makes it a good area
for development. His concern is that if a major devel-
oper, came in to develop in this west area and it is not
in the city, the delay could cause them to look else-
where.
Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1610.
iSeconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried 7-0.,
C. Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
43.9 acres of land located west of 1-35W service rod
and south of the existing city limit line. (Z-1611
Mr. Watkins pointed out area on a map and stated he does
feel the area has significant development potential and
recommends approval. Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend
approval of Z-1611. Seconded by Mr. Pearson, unanimously
carries' 7-0.
D. Ap roval of the proposed annexation of approximately
367 acres of land located between 1-35W and the Santa Fe
Railroad. (Z-1612)
10
Mr. Watkins stated there is a population of 27 people in
the area. Bonnie Brae is a major arterial and there is
some development going on in the area and he would like
to see city standards imposed in future developments and
therefore recommends approval of annexation.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1612.
Seconded by Mr. Claiborne, unanimously carried 7-0.
/-l r1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
HACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE;: November 11 1983
SUHJECTt Approval of the proposed annexation of approxi-
mately 43.9 acres of land located west of 1-35W
service road and south of the existing city
limit line. (Z-1611)
SUMMARY: Annexation of this area presents the opportunity
to control land use, to have subdivisions con-
structed in accordance with city standards, to
require developer participation in improvements
to perimeter roads, and to apply building code
standards,
SiLe: Approximately 43.9 acres
Land Use; Vacant Land
Land Use Plan: Moderate Commercial Center
Population: Zero (0)
Transportation: Proximity to Airport, 1-35,
and FN 1515. Northeast
portion of tract is served
y 1-35 West service road.
This section of service
road is in extremely poor
condition but is the only
reasonable access to the
property. A secondas-y
arterial is planned for
south side of tract.
Existing Utilities: Hickory Creek Sewer Line
Planned utilities., 16" Water and Sower is
available for extension
from northeast property
line.
This land has high development potential
because, of access and proximity to water
and sewer.
ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing; no other action required.
z~lbll
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES: If Take no act:.on
2. Disapprove annexation
3, Reduce the size of the proposed annexation
RECOMMENDATION., The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,
EXHIBIT., 1. Map
2. Service plan
34 Property owner list
4. Reply form totals
5• Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of October 12, 1983
Charles-S. Watkins
Senior Planner
. ,ftri~ ~ fry/ 4••.. ~'s/i
AIRPORT RD°
I' ' ~ 'i~' ~
i
1 1 V
~ti It
~rF. r I r ✓y'~417►♦ \'G y, i ,,~-r ~l' ' r ' ~'1 1
~ I~ f 1 r F
Z- I's I I
r V
,jA
' ` , 1 1 ~ ' • .111 7 1 . ~ , a , ~ ".V" 1 ,
` ~ w' , nA.1~/~ 4 r 'r' ~ '"i`S• /~p I VI, ' • 1 1t 1 1'!;,,'' < Ih''•wFry•~
L{i ,j f ~y"•a of ~fY .f~y ,1.t '~~~►~~~,y ' ,
OIBIN by Sf ~'~b., 4~%:.t't. 6':'6" a''3 ~i' tif;+ .
' I r. M1'v ~ ' ~ 141 . ` ,'~S ~ ~ .~,•.a
Vie
1
PTAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the govern:Ing body of a
annexing an area; and city prior to passage of an ordinance
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area whioh is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW0 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Sootion 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 070a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
1, Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sower lines in accordance with article 13,06 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the eff.ectiva
date of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets '
(1) Emergency maintenancu of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city,
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(bu lding, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing)
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
T, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, eto „ on the effeo-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately & months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists oi, a five year plan that is up.
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
teohxtii:al standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for UP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
504 ~ 'r"rauj g bulloy 7k ~S.7py
rrr~f yn
1+ / r
7 r,~tt y1;
7r,,~¢ Nt- 1A ~3P1f 12a+~~ r S/rtf .d1e>a I
R o Boy ll8 s / APn ien "U vel
rNd y6 '14.1 Grate A Brubaker
7rtcf 40 ` /(3 ✓ fNas~Prn 54a~d a~1i
'1 00 s,' `16 Boll An
Sfe 0d)rr6: llOOr't
7"r04+ 6011 440 (114J
set address dbcdve
7'rat,f ys"` IE ✓ Crret~ M. ~~ubakrr
lG~~2 bldbu~ Rl,~ ,~r~1no U 91'36
' 7"ra+,+ `lE ~ali~ Ci'¢i~s CaacrPlt Ce,
/sty /e3~1~ ~vn~a! ~dzol
Tra~7 ~lE`1~ Roo R00-r1n~
SPe eddrrss i6ouv~
i
' i
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1611
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
(10/18}
None Received None Received
(11/1}
None Received None Received
c
P&Z Minutes `
October, 12, 1983
page 7
B. Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
1014.4 acres of land located south of Highway 380 and
west of 1-35. ('L-1610)
Mr, Watkins stated this area is currently surrounded by
the City of Denton. He explained there are 56 people
living in the area, predominately around SelA7n School.
Staff recommends approval because this area has poten-
tial for, developp went, utilities are planned for the area
for, 1964-85. The area has a major transportation system
easily accessible, railroad tracks are available in the
area and with the planned utilities makes it a good area
for development. His concern is that if a major devel-
oper came in to develop in this west area and it is not
in the city, the delay could cause them to look else-
where,
Mr,. Escue made a motion to recommend approval of z-1610.
rSeconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried 7-0.
C.! Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately,
43.9 acres of land located west of 1-35W service road
and south of the existing city limit line. (z-1611)
Mr. Watkins pointed out area on a map and stated he does
(UI3APPROVED feel the area has significant development potential and
recommends approval. Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend
approval of Z-1611. Seconded by Mr.. Pearson, unanimously
carried 7-0.
D. Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
367 acres of land located between 1-35W and the Santa Fe
Railroad. (`G-1612)
Mr. Watkins stated there is a population of 27 people in
the area. Bonnie Brae is a major arterial and there is
some development going on in the area and he would like
to see city standards imposed in future developments and
therefore recommends approval of annexation.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1612.
Seconded by Mr. Claiborne, unanimously carried 7-0.
BACITY CK-UP GSUMNARYGSHHFT
MEETING DATS: November it 1983
SUBJEM Approval of the proposed annexation of approxi.-
mately 367 acres of land located between 1-35W
and the Santa Fe Railroad. (Z-1612)
SUMMARY: Annexation of this area presents the opppor-
tunity to control land use, to have aubdivi-
$ions conatruoted in accordance with city
standards, to require developer participation
in improvements to perimeter roads, and to
apply building code standards.
Size: Approximately 367 Acres
Land Use: Approximately 18 Single
Family Houses, 2-3 Busi-
nesses and Vacant Land
Land Use Plant Low Intensity
Population: 27
Transportation: South Bonnie Brae,
Willowwood Roselawn (all
unimprovedj. Bonnie Brae,
a planned major arterial,
Existing Utilities: 1. Hickory Creek Line
2, 6" waterline along
Bonnie Brae to Corbin
Road
Planned Utilities: None
Natural Features: No significant constraints
This area is developing as large lot residential
(typical one acre lot size). Annexation could
inhibit large lot development due to perimeter
street paving requirement. Choosing not to
annex this area would mean no developer partic-
ipation in improvements to South Bonnie Hrae
Street. This area is no farther away from the
core of the city than many areas already in the
city.
ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing; no other action is
required.
i
2 1612
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES= 1, Take no action
2. Disapprove annexation
3, Reduce the size of the proposed annexation
RECOMMENDATION= The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
XXHIHIT: 1, Map
2, Service plan
3. Property owner list
4 Reply form totals
5, Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of October, 12, 1983
ar es S. Watkins
Senior Planner.
Ea5 I n . ~e
y
r4o I{ P )9,874 1
n Rd. ' k~__ Rd + •I M M
o pR .J 1 I rL I
2.6
a
z
• / J;,
i•.,Jim 'ChrIi oI Rd1
O .
t ~d ?Tom 00 o Is ,l . • -mot
$ 9 ~r
J
ns • C o I t d. ~ ~ 2 2 Ibis r' ,e - ~ 4
Sprlnude'Rd. e6r4 f 2
d C Or S w
p • 46W A61 o~• <
2469 / Bo Bra y _ S LL y ~
Lirel Rd >
oc t / u - 'A
116 0
'Lot
ROT ' s J 5 4° • Ryon Rd '
o f: w ( ( t IR naon.• C
~ / O J 7'7 ~'1 x r
{ Carrufn
PILOT KNOB r ` Q04~ rBrusA:L+utRd •r~trlln I
i Ill / ~ohnron nY w; ✓ ~.,y
• • 4, Old I -
A
00'•~~t'~,r/ ' /C~ iii/ • I
Rtl, po i gr 1~JJ-rte ~o ~h,6
i• •~ror ford d y / •41 1/ l~, ~ ~ I, _ S i~~Br
• ~ a
Vr
1 ` ~J.•~.K:lt
tib Ii 10:1 Iwo .1!
d nth' NOIq AI on•
•'7 • • ur. L y • rEf. • ~J u
- ARC' I j': • .~Ke4krHN1"Rd. I
r~ gold, Jutlln fed POP 44 I CK H'T_~-.lr_ r-r. -7r_ _.t-: ;~Y r4
M
g~
~ Hoy 10~,_gd,~, v ~ , ~ . a ~';PfC~hld ~=NII1~ Lon
,c yarpis;~R-sue ~szlot Rd . ~r g 1 r _
PLAN OF SERVICE Foil ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 070a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, he City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is boundted as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1, Pursuant to the provision:: of Article 070a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
I, Basic Servico Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to-ealls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D, Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13,06 of
appendix A of the coda of the City of Denton, Texas,
E, Refuse Collection
The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
data of annexation,
A
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Pagq two
r, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
us the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished tinder the established
policies of the city,
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation) etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Service Plan
Annexod Areas
Pago three
G, MisaeIIaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as;
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this now CIP planning year the
annexation area will be Judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
r~
r
Y r GI 1
rhAf~ q L A, 1
}
f I
t 7
}
' rr y
1^ a F
+
• I r +
l i l+ ,
'7 '74 JA
PrA
Wf.
r '
i
; 1
1
-TrLAIN tltfl
~inA
N. 411
._._,~Grs,~ ►ti~.. ~ ~r~l~ ~ G~ofY ~ TrL~ ,S~JPr~~~'1
r 3
A r G Lien 4 I'r Cr
161 sbr v f 7 -111
T Nort Geedsah
L2C1 k1l,innnnrkr rr 6-"OA 4, 96 ~a
14. C ,
P3 0~ 7
i
1 17 T o f u,
s
II Iy .
F }
j
46 1 ! F),i h r
5 '76
Ale, 1,14Y of-'
~a
Qel
r~o~ iy~ I ti~~a►I► Char:
~4
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COLTCIL
Z-1612
IN FAVOR , IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
(10/18)
Frederick C. Brandt William B, Rogers
205 Solar Way 206 Bob Goodson Way
Denton, Texas 76205 Route 1
382-1906 Denton, Texas 76205
387-7696
Dr, John Flohr
208 Solar Way
Denton, Texas 76205
387-8798
Sue Wilson
Route 1, Box 358
Denton, Texas 76205
387-6204
Charles V, Dansby
V1 Highview Ct
Denton, Texas 76201
566-2568
A, L. McCormick
201 Solar Way
Denton, Texas 76205
387-6369
Edgar Horace Linden
Route 1, Box 360
Denton, Texas 76205
382-6286
(11/1)
Robert W. Jones
1824 S, Bonnie Brae
Denton, Texas
382-2770
Charles V, Dansby
#1 Highview Court
Denton, Texas
566-2568
A. L. McCormick
201 Solar Way
Denton, Texas 76205
387-6369
P&Z Minutes
October 12) 1983
Page 7
B. Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
1014,4 acres of land located south of Highway 380 and
west of 1-35, (Z-1610)
Mr, Watkins stated this area is currently surrounded by
the City of Denton. He explained there are 56 people
living in the area, predominately around Selwyn School.
Staff recommends approval because this area has poten-
tial for development) utilities are planned for the area
for 1984-85. The area has a major transportation system
easily accessible) railroad tracks are available in the '
area and with the planned utilities makes it a good area
for development. His concern is that if a major devel-
oper came in to develop in this west area and it is not
in the city, the delay could cause them to look else-
where,
Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1610
Seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried 7-0,,
C. Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
43.9 acres of land located west of I-35W service ro d
and south of the existing city limit line. (Z-1611
Mr. Watkins pointed out area on a map and stated he does
feel the area has significant development potential and
recommends approval. Ms. Cole made a motion to recommend
approval of Z-1611, Seconded by Mr. Pearson, unanimously
carried 7-0.
D. rApproval of the proposed annexation of approximately
367 acres of land located between 1-35W and the Santa Fe
Railroad. (Z-1612)
(UNAPPROVED) Mr. Watkins stated there is a population of 27 people in
the area. Bonnie Brae is a major arterial and there is
some development going on in the area and he would like
to see city standards imposed in future developments and
therefore recommends approval of annexation.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1612.
`Seconded by Mr. Claiborne, unanimously carried 7-0.
1 /
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE; Novewber 1, 1983
SUBJECT; Approval of the proposed annexation of approxi-
mately 1125 acres of land located on both sides
of Mayhill Road north of 1-35. (Z-1613)
SUMMARY: Annexation of this area presents the opppor-
tunity to control land use, to have subdivi-
sions constructed in accordance with city
standards, to require developer participation
in improvements to perimeter roads, and to
apply building code standards.
Size: Approximately 1125 Acres
Land Use: Residential, Agricultural,
Vacant
Land Use Plan: High Intensity and Low
Intensity Area
Population: 87
Transportation: Mayhill Road (unimproved),
Edwards and Swisher Roads
(unimproved), proximity to
1-35 East and Loop 288.
Planned Loop 288 to go
through this area.
Existing Utilities: Hickory Creek Line
Planned Utilities: 1986 - 10" Sewer Line
from corner of Spencer
and Mayhill Roads, along
Mayhill to the landfill.
Natural Features: No major constraints
Z-1613
Page 2
SUMMARY
(Continued)= The proximity of this area to the mall, the
availability of services for extension, the
location of the landfill site and proposed
mobile home development in this area suggests
a high development potential for this area.
Edwards and one half of Swisher Road would be
a maintenance responsibility of the city, if
annexed.
ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing; no other action is
required.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Take no action
2. Disapprove annexation
3. Reduce the size of the annexation
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
EXHIBIT: 1. Map
2. Service plan
3. Property owner list
44 Reply form totals
5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of October 12, 1983
~4 I A4&2s,-
es 5. Watkins
Senior Planner
2.6 I ' - 380 ~ 4.4'• - A
`
f.. ~ ` : jam,. ~ ~ /4' ~ ~ •:r `x ~!0 y `
~ CreeA....
JFrgr ~ E \ , ~ ' f0ater d~ . ~ c 2 ~ ~ ~
*J Hill
A d.
lib, !f ~o _ 4 • 4~ z a ~ r
• • . 1
SHADY 1 }
SHORES r
V r P U
K ZCne ♦ • I ~Z POP
1 ' r N SPCC S5des
lRd
/ Ryon F,E • • -
IR rt~pt1• COPINTH Sorts
pop
Hickory Ctisk Ad • ~ I~,j~ r„50n ~ ~ r' Y ~3 ✓t ;
~ • 4 . COI C I ~ • _ , K ~ L~
9~` ~Qrpr ~I- ( 1 - ti t\~ r
, ✓ m
ge V1
y216!w~ •77 }~b~~ LAKEy~~~-1
z rA
Y G tA5 ier 1 ErLD
~ ~ r >J )t, HICKORY LAKE
•CREEK q DAL. LI
!C gY614 ♦AI POP 1,4
e Pte...
A`: Nle ♦14t Nif~'Rd r~♦;YI L Y i }DOP 21d lp c:
-FtJk
~ • 1 i ✓ C
I.o
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the govorning body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1, pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
1, Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of tho
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13,06-of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city,
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
ti, Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be Ustalled in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation, The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Sorvice Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City oorsists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as;
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics,
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city,
~ z-~619
! A~s~roe~ 6Nb Tr~e~ t Masan ANa~9a►rot.
Tml Ig
'RI.' ~CY Ss~ A+n~in ~e t. .
rra ~ q II is Ga !e ,Qavis~+n
e1 Y 999a! .
"a IS4 44). ~0AL 17 Aidlaod A d),Ih4 7
7r~o~ 3A I
r r+~aai 3A`1~ ~•ehad aARUieon,
16ob Ceonfl Club Rl) ~i,~~cnGt Tx -7fPdi
_ I`rrof 3l3 Qon UCunnfn~/~a~ _ .
PY 7) Sex $S CJ ,dvn~ih 76,01.
Tracf 3 ~]r a14 A I~~~~tn
Al. x#171 say SsQ~ &Mfdo %Aoi
A. 4ek
tai Cdr.~Pn~~ kdis TX "7"61
1
f~ba, ?$Y lra4f •~8 111„ pal dak ,'ar~a~ U~h~or~ .
aao, ~ryG~ rw~, , se~A F~e~r, dt~t~ -74
~"rt~a N"~ ?Ienry S. ~1J~Pr ~ Ce. rrUS~Pt -
_ 11 !r
.90.,
~4 bs, 4S0 7rGl t SG r`l~n r~ /t1i +~hr~ CD ,
~~5, 1330 ~lrRct ~ar,ws 1., J~rac~it
313V Tur4~o C"tk 'A loll ~A~~td 95a
•
•
' 1 1
7h« f ea ~lal~rdn FGndPr/o,,,rlc
1?~ J~ a, 13o X S4 B Armen '76ao 1
Jra~t J$ 13 Al
P'VfA J1Gr}~~nZ
n), Box 60 pmio, 'n A01
~hac~ 18 nn~C rf j~, /ifa~ti~9<r
64Y inao I
Trac~ 1$` a ~Par4e J. Kay
~r~~t 19.9 far! Feworas
l?~ . FI ~ , Qon~eh '~Ee?a I ,
1
1
•
7raf ddA 77 GrralQ SnVor
164.? /~1GLin4R~~ /~tA~? 90.20/
7ra~~ a3 SUSur ports i Inc,
7roal ~3A Crvy wolf W1,01's
P6, ~oX 8 5~0?os t ~aflas r~ '7,N r
7reci a.3 r3 tv;140N K, / arkM
r+. a !1 Saa /06/ 104h TX ?S Coa
lraol d3!j Rh;an s~l~~
T4 ~a7
7rRc} X23 $ ~p~~b ~oistlle
3vq Bonnie t3rap~ Qa,~~an '96~c1
`fraci .t s ~d CcwQNP
Pi. 7q 7x Box qo) Aml oh ?Gaol
Ra, M 71 ~cX )441 ~Pmlon N,201
7•,'aat ~9 Guill(~+•rt luulcf~~~ Jr.
39G ~dward'S~~awiJOille7'n 7,5`c~'7
Treat ~9A Par Ad. uphiv (.0,
1 ~l01 S• 5yammen5 I tuhJ G'i/le .
1
7'ro~f 3e etl lpn A, Ar,4,hsoh
Ri, # 7/ 8on d ppnfcn ~60?0l
Tract 3oA 4odKw.4 hawis
P-0, Aix SDOS1 Arntan 7«0l
Tract ZDA I C. A. 6rp~a
1
Al, 0 7/ 13eX /o9A~ ,ll~nfen 76ao!
Tract 3e S Aoeq oa / ie Z)jrre
7~ 4ox ell ~khfar, naol
1}ract 3o L Riohorr~ Arley Maria
^ n~, ~,fez 3~8, A~n~on '~Gao~
Traoi 30 G t~, >r, ~~i,l~alew
;007 kayewcod1 Aonien `NPOI
r
7rnef 30 ~ l9r~drrw Cor~Oarafion
o?~Jd1 ~r~,l,iil nd,~ IJan~rn '~6~01
~+'och a~°,2 ]~a~in /~cCdrh+ar,l~
R9, b~nde+ 1`x en;zor
Traci a? N Aatlny Pa Ho))
i
P. 0. box /0 3I i &niori 96,10}
Trrct a~ G Aaol in A. 9#11
91, ~ 7i 866 rd8~ APn~en Nk)
Yract d9 h~ 1~r~e Powell ; ~'ana 13ac:!nar
r. N 171 Acx /08 A Qenfen '76r~oi
rrac+ d? Carold No'nFt
rt~ac+ ~~A l;awrrnt+. r~'~ (oeurgll
7rtc.} /y fSo~r»ie C'oolv~o~
y, #f 'Je Qoz 944 donfen '4ee e
rhac+ Q C~in~en l~row'h~ Jr,
~u~ 8 1+lau(1and~ Garland 7n ''I~`G'10
Traof !4 G 13abky Coen~ac~
R4. ~ 13ax q3°A, Qen'1ao ~76ao1
Traci ap Ro~Pr C, Su((ivon ~ ~ob+r~ ~+istr
r~d4~ ~ryQn rpWPN~ Sui~il lOr~pA«AS
7roc~ 1$ .~u~y /~KaY
Ri, -N 7~ I3ox 60~.4~ Ar»~en '7601
j rr~t /8 .9 pct days
n~, IgoX $3~ benfoa ~~xo1
Tracf f8 !3 Cocrard f c~yl~
P 0. BOX a~ QI ~ 4an1on N; w
1 rac+ !8 Robin 6kl14 W rlson
n~~7~ lax 8~ ~ ~1Pn~ery 76s?ol
lydcl18G ~l3. S~+i~1~
4, 13e,c '7 9 ,fin f a~ 7,S a o
•
•
PROPERTY G1MER REPLY FORMS•
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1613
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
(11/1) John D, Putnam Andrew Corporation
11 Nob Hill Circle 2701 Mayhill Road
Austin, Texas 78746 Denton, Texas 76201
(512) 327-1530 566-2400
Melvin G, Hartline
Route 7, Box 60
Denton Texas 76205
382-3046
i Guilbert M, Waldrip, Jr,
396 Edwards
Lewisville, Texas 75067
(214) 436-1948
Judy Kay
Route 7, Box 60A
Denton, Texas
387-7857
George J. Kay
Route 7, Box 60A
Denton, Texas 76205
387-7857
Mrs, Frances Mallow Fulton
Route 7, Box 85 Mayhill Road
Denton, Texas 76205
382-3595
t
PROPERTY OMN''ER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
7,-1613
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
(10/18) None Received Joe A, Mars
Route 7, Box 83
Denton, Texas
382-3389
Susar Farm, Inc
Route 7, Box SF91A
Denton, Texas
Ed Cowart
A1ite Cowart
Route 7, Box 90
Denton, Texas
387-3198
Bonnie E, Coonrod
Route 7, Box 92
Denton, Texas 76201
382-3964
Ilene Powell
Jana Bednar
Route 7, Box 108D
382-9788
J. B. Smith
Route 7, Box 79 Mayhill Rd
Denton, Texas 76205
387-3398
Clifton R. Brackeen
Edith A. Brackeen
Route 7, Box 87
Denton, Texas
382-2980
Mr, & Mrs, Don Cunningham
Route 7, Box 85C
Denton, Texas
387-0620
Mr. & Mrs, William E, Buckalew
Route 7, Box 88B
Denton, Texas
387-4010
1
P&Y. Minutes
October 12, 1983
Page 8
E. !Approval of the proposed annexation of approximately
1125 acres of land located on both sides of Mayhill Road
north of 1.35. (Z-1613)
(UNAPPROVED) Mr. Watkins explained there has been interest from
developers for a home subdivision on 15 acres on Swisher
Road; a 30-40 acre tract on Page Road for a possible
mobile home park and Henry S. Miller company (not
cpposed to being annexed) owns land in the area which
they plan to develop in the future, He stated city is
seeking control of the development of this area because
we want land uses to be controlled. There is a popula-
tion of 87 people in the area, there would be required
street maintenance, mowing by the Parks and Recreation
Department and fire protection provided but the cost to
the city would be worth control of development. Approval
is recommended for annexation,
Mr. Sidor asked if Loop 288 would go through the middle
of this annexed area?
Mr. Watkins replied yes.
Patty Wilson, from the public seating asked how many
mailouts there were and what is the procedure.
Mr. Watkins explained this meeting is not a public
hearing and the city is not required to do a mailout.
Ms. Wilson continued stating she does not feel the city
is at all fair, the city should take care of what they
already have, which they do not, how do they feel more
area can be serviced. She stated she does not want
anything the city has to offer, already the city dump
and sewage treatment plant are in her backyard. She
said she cannot afford the city, it mis-manages tax
money already.
Mr. Pearson commented he feels the Planning and Zoning
Commission needs to look at long term development of the
city, this area is showing development is going to re-
sult and feels it is his responsibility to vote for
approval.
Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approval of.
Z-1613. Seconded by Mr. Sidor, unanimously carried 7-0.
NU,
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF !'UCH
PUBLIC HEARING,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSI
SECTION I,
On the day of 1983, at o1olook in
the City Council Chamber of the Munioipal Buil uig, the city
Council of the City of Denton, Texas, will hold a public hearing
giving all Interested persons the right to appear and be heard
on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas, of the
property described below,
On the day of 1983, at 7100 o'clock P,M,
in the City Council Chamber o t h`6 Municipal Building of the
City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public
hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be
heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas,
of the following described property, to-wits
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part
of the W. Dabbs Survey, Abst, No, 328 and the J, West Survey,
Abst, No, 1331 and being more particularly described as followal
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said city
limits being established by Ordinance No, 74.36 Tr, it, said
point' lying 350 feet north of and perpendicular to the
oenterline of U,S. Highway 380 and In the east boundary line of
the W, Dabbs Survey, Abst. No, 328, same being the west boundary
line of the J, Williamson Survey, Abst, No, 14181
THENCE north along said survey lines passing the northeast
corner of said Dabbs survey, same being the southeast corner of
the SAid West survey and continuing north passing the northwest
corner of the said Williamson survey, same being the, southwest
corner of the A. Calvin Survey, Abst, No, 306 and doontinuinq
north to a point for a corner, said point lying 10,560 feet
north of and perpendicular to the said present city limitsl
THENCE westerly 10,560 feet north of and parallel with the said
present city limits to a point for a corner in the east boundary
line of a tract of land conveyed to Ray Lynch by deed and
recorded in Volume 871, Page 421, of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas;
THENCE south along the east boundary line of saio Lynch tract to
a point for a corner, said point 1ying 10,060 feet north of and
perpendicular to the said present 01ty limitsl
THENCE easterly 10,060 feet north of and parallel with said
present city limits to a point for a corner, said point lying
500 feet west of the east boundary line of said West survey,
same being the west boundary line of said Calvin survey;
':HENCE south 500 feet west of and parallel with said survey line
to a pone for a corner in said present city limits, said point
lying 350 feet north of and perpendicular to the centerline of
U.S. Highway 360;
1
THENCE easterly along said present oily limits and 350 feet
north of and parallel with the oenterline of U.S. Highway 380 to
the plaoe of beginning and containing 175 acres of land more or
less,
SECTION 11,
.
The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized
and directed to cause notice of Suoh publio hearing to be
published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the
City and in the above desoribed territory not more than forty
days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public
hearingg, all in accordance with the Municipal Annexation Act
(Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes),
SECTION III,
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
following its passage and approval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1983,
RICHARD 0, STEWART, MA R
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST,
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRET
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOPN,j
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY,
i
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THATt
The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation
proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the
following described t6rritory to the corporate limits Of the
City of Denton, to-wilt
All that Ctrtain lot, trac', or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part
of the W Dabbs Survey, Abst, No. 328 and the 0. West Survey,
Abst, No. 1331 and being more particularly described as follows?
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said city
limits being established by ordinance No, 74-36 Tr, II, said
point lying 350 feet north of and perpendicular to the
centerline of U.S. Highway 380 and in the east boundary lino of
the W. Dabbs Survey, Abet. No. 328, same being the west boundary
line of the J, Williamson Survey, Abst. No. 14181
THENCE north along said survey lines passing the r,)rtheast
corner of said Dobbs survey, same being the southeast corner of
the said 'Rest survey and continuing north passing the northwest
corner of the said Williamson survey, same being the southwest
corner of the A. Calvin Survey, Abst, No, 306 and continuing
north to a point for a corner, said point lying 10,560 feet
north of and perpendicular to the said present city limitsl
THENCE westerly 10,560 feet north of and parallel with the said
present city limits to a point for a corner in the east boundary
line of a tract of land conveyed to Ray Lynch by deed and
recorded in Volume 871, Page 421, of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texasr
THENCE south along the east boundary line of said Lynch tract to
a point for a corner, said point lying 10,060 feet north of and
perpendicular to the said present city limitsl
THENCE easterly 10,060 feet north of and parallel with said
present city limits to a point for a corner, said point lying
500 feet west of the east boundary line of said We t survey,
same booing the vast boundary line of said Calvin au 1. vevi
THENCE south 500 feet west of and parallel with said survey line
to a pont for a oorner in said present city limits, said point
lying 350 feet north of and perpendicular to the centerline of
U,S. Highway 3801
THENCE easterly along said present city limits and 350 feet
north of and parallel with the centerline of U.S, Highway 380 to
the place of beginning and containing 175 acres of land more or
less,
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council
of the City of Denton, Texas,, on the day of
1983, at o'clock, in the City Council Chamber of the
Municipal Building, for all persons tnterested in the above
proposed annexation, At said time and place all such persons
shall have the right to appear and be heart. Of all said
matters and things, all persona Interested in the things and
matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
1 ~ 1
•
r ~
A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City council
or the city or Denton, Texas, on the day of ,
1983, at 7100 o'olook P,M, in the City Council Cnamber o t e
Municipal Building or the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons
interested in the above proposed annexation, At said time and
place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be
heard, of all said matters and things, all persons interested
in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice.
G b3, 3 E ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
CHARLOTTE A R , CITY SEC ET R
J
Novuubor, 1, 1983
CITY C(RINCIL AGINDA I'MI
SUBJFCr i
Consider. Resolution of Formal Approval of the city of
Denton Industrial/Commercial Pretreatment Program,
SLIMY:
In an effort to conply with provisions of the Clean Water,
Act, the City of Denton was required by the kttviroinnental
Protection Agency (EPA) to develop an approvable
pretreatment program, The City has now coapleted all
activities associated with program development and a
program document has been submitted for IPA "approval",
Final acceptance of the Denton Indus trial/CoauaereisI
Pretreatment Program by IPA is pending progbram approval by
the Public Utilities Board and the Denton G'ity Council, An
overview of the pretreatment program will be presented to
the City Council by the utility staff,
FISCAL SLRI ZMY t
Program operations will be funded in the annual operating
budget by revenues from user charge and surcharge fees,
ALTERNATIVESi
None, The Environmental Protection Agency has mandated the
program.
RFC0MErMTIONS ;
The ".:blic Utilities Board, at their meeting of October. 18,
1983, recommended to the City Council approval of subject
Resolution.
Ressppectfull/y,
R. I, Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Proposed Resolution for Approval, of Denton
Industrial/Coamrcial Pretreatment Program
II Sewer Use Ordinance #81-39
0018v/3
1
NO. A~ ~39
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, 1965, AS AMENDED, BY DELETINQ THEREFROM DIVISION
1 OF ARTICLE III "SANITARY SEWERS" OF CHAPTER 251 SECTIONS 25-35
THROUGH AND INCLUDING SECTION 2$.451 BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE
VIII TO CHAPTER 25, PROVIDING FOR REGULATION AND USE OF AND
DISCHARGE INTO SANITARY SEWERSI PROVIDING rOR PERMITS AND FEES
FOR CERTAIN DISCHAP.OE51 PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN USER CHARGESt
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED T140 HUNDRED DOLLARS
(5200.00) FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFI PROVIDING A SEVERAHILITY
CLAUSE; AND PROVTDrNrI FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSI
PART I.
That the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, as
amended, 1966, is further amended by deleting therefrom Division
1 of Article III "Sanitary Sewers" of Chapter 25, Sections 25-35
through and Including Section 25-48.
PART II,
That Chapter 25 of the code! of ordinances of the city of
Denton, Texas, 1966, as amended, is further amended by adding
thereto a new Article VIII, Section 25-130 through and Including
Section 25-180 which shall read as foliowai
ARTICLE VIII.
REGULATION OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT DISr•HAROE
INTO SANITARY ,SEWAGE SYSTEM,
DIVISION 1
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 25-130. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Article Is to regulate and control
wastewater disposal facilities and practices within the City to
as to protect the health, welfare and property of its citizens
and to insure that all wastewater disposal, facilities and
practices are in compliance with state and federal laws, rules
and regulations.
SECTION 25-131, SCOPE
This Article shall apply to the direct or indirect dl.srharae
of all water-carried wastes in the City of Denton and shall,
PAGE ONE
among other things provide for the regulation of sewer
construction in areas within the jurisdiction of the city of
Denton, the approval of plans for sewer construction, the
quantity and quality of wastewater discharged, the degree of
wastewater pretreatment required, the issuance of
Industrial/Commercial wastewater Discharge Permits and of other
miscellaneous permits.
SECTION 25-132, DEFINITIONS
Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the
meaning of terms used in this Article shall be as followat
1, "ABNORMAL STRENGTH WASTEWATER" shall mean any
wastewater having a suspended solid, SOD, Coo
chlorine demand or total phosohate concentration
in excess of that found in normal strength,
wastewater,
2. "ACT" shall mean Public Law 92-560, as amended, as
enacted by the United States Congress and known as
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or. Clean
Water Act,
3. "SOD" (denoting Biochemical Oxygen Demand) shall
mean the quantity of oxygen utilized in the
biochemical oxidation of organic matter under
standard laboratory procedure in five {5) days at
200C, expressed in milligrams per liter,
4. "BUILDING" is any structure used or intended for
supporting or sheltering any use or occupancy,
S. "BUILDING DRAIN" is that cart of the piping of a
building drainage system which receives the
discharge of a)1 soil, waste, and other drainage
from inside the structure and conveys the some to
the building service line outside the foundation
wall of such building.
6. "CATEGORICAL PRETREATMENT STANDARD" shall mean
wastewater discharge limits applicable to a
specific category of major commercial/industrial
users as promulgated by the EPA in accordance with
Section 307(b) and (c) of the Act.
7, "CHLORINE DEMAND" shall mean the difference
between the amount of chlorine added to water,
wastewater or industrial wastes and the amount of
residual chlorine remaining at the end of, a twenty
(20) minute contact period.
8,' "COD" (denoting Chemical Oxygen Demand) shall mean
the measure of the oxygen equivalent mf that
susceptiblethto oxidationttby a a strongechemical
oxidant.
9. "COMMITTEE" shall mean the Environmental Apoeals
,Committee,
PAGE TWO
10, "COMPOSITE SAMPLE" shall mean a mixture Of grab
samples collected at the same sampling point at
different times,
11, "CONTROL MANHOLE' shall mean an opening giving
access to a service line at some point before the
service line discharges to the sewage system,
12, "COOLINO WATER" shall mean the wafer discharged
Prom any system of condensation such as air
condltionlnq, cooling or reErlaeratlon,
11, "DIRECT DISCHARGE" shall mean the conveyance of
wastewater from a service line uninterrupted to a
City public sewer,
14, "DIRECTOR or UTILITIES" shall mean the Chief
Executive Officer of the Utility Department of the
City of Denton or his authorized deputy, agent or
representative,
15, "DOMESTIC USI,R" shall mean any user who is not an
Industrial User or Commercial User,
16, "DRY CLOSET" is an indoor room or an outdoor privy
used as a toilet but lacking water for conveyance
of waste,
17, "EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental.
Protection Agency or its successor agencies,
184 "FLOW RATE" shall mean the quantity of wastewater
that flows past a particular paint In a certain
period of time,
19, "GRAB SAMPLE" shall mean a sample collected at a
particular time and place, representing only the
composition of the source at that time and place,
20, "INDIRECT DISCHARGE" shall mean the conveyance of
wastewater to a public sewer by Anil means other
than direct discharge,
2l."INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL USER" shall mean any
industrial or commercial establishment which uses
the sewage system of the City and falls under a
standard industrial classification,
22, "INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
PERMIT", referred to herein as "Industrial/
+ Commercial Discharge Permit", shall mean a permit
required of a major Indus trlal/commercial user to
deposit or discharge waste into any sewage system
under jurisdiction of the City of Denton,
23, "INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL WASTEWATER SURCHARGE" shall
mean a charts, as set forth In the latest edition
of the City of Denton Codo of Ordinances levied on
industrial/commercial users of the sewage
treatment works for the additional cost of
treating wastewater discharges of ahnormal
strength wastewater,
24, "INTERFERE" shall mean Inhibition or disruption of
the sewage system which Contributes to a violation
of any requirement of this Article,
PAGE THREE
f
1
25, "MAJOR INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL USER" shall mean a
user of the sewage system that: (a) discharges
25,000 gallons or more of wastewater into the
sewage system per average work days or (b) is
regulated by the Categorical Pretreatment
Standards) or (c) Is found by the City of Denton
deterioration eof the wastewater eYsystem which
or cause
detrimental to the biological process, tither
singly or in combination with other contrihuting
wastewater, on the treated sewage; system or upon
the quality of the discharge from the sewage
system,
26, mg/1" shall mean milligrams per liter.
27, "NATURAL OUTLET" shall mean any outlet into a
watercourse ditch, laxe, or other body of surface
water or groundwater,
28, "NORMAL STRENOTH WASTrWATER" shall mean wastewater
which, when analyzed, by the City, shows by weight
a daily average of not more than 2,085 pounds Der
million gallons (250 milligrams per liter) of
suspended solids, and 2,502 lb/mg (.?.S0
milligrams/1) of SOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand),
and 2,085 lb/mg of COG (250 mg/1), and not more
than 15.1 pounds per million gallons f9,0
milligrams per liter fmg/1) of chlorine demand,
and 41,7 pounds per million gallons (5,0 ma/1) of
phosphorus, and which is otherwise acceptable into
a public sewer under the terms of this Article,
29, "NPDES PERMIT" shall mean the National. Pollution
Discharge .Eliminations System (NPDES) cermit as
issued pojreuant to Section 402 of the Act 03
U.S.C. 1342)4
30, "OBJECTIONA£LE HASTE" shall mean any wastewater
that can harm either the sewers, sewer treatment
process, or equipment, have an adverse effect on
receiving stream, or otherwise endanger life,
health, or property, or constitutes a nuisance,
31. "PERSON" shall mean any individual, firm, company,
assorlatlon, society, corporation or entity,
including a city, county, town, village, or sewer
district,
32. "PH" shall mean the degree of acid(ty or
alkalinity of a solution, expressed as the
logarithm of the reciprocal of the hydrogen Ion
concentration in gram equivalents per liter of
solution,
33, "POINT OF DISCHARGE" shall mean any discernible,
confined and discrete conveyance or vessel from
which wastewater may be discharged into a public
waterway or public sewage system,
14, "POLLUTED WATER" shall mean anv water, liquid or
gaseous soluble or waste containing of the
organic lnor
Inorganic natures settleable solids that may form
sludge deposits: grease and oilsi floating soles s
PAGE FOUR
which may cause unsightly appearance, colon
phenols and other substances to an extent which
would Impart any taste or odor to the receiving
stream, and toxic or poisonous substances in
suspension, colloidal state, solution or gases,
35, "PRIVY" is an outhouse or similar type small
building used as a toilet where wastes are either
buried on site or collected and disposed of
elsewhere,
36, "PRETREATMENT" ~ Shall mean the treatment of
wastewater before Introduction Into a sewage
system,
37, "SANITARY SEWER" shall mean a sewer intended to
receive domestic wastewater and admissible
industrial/commercial wastewater but to which
storm, surface and groundwaters are not
Intentionally admitted,
38. "SEPTIC TANK" shalt mean any covered water-tight
tank not connoeted to the sewage system and which
Is designed for the treatment of sewage,
39, "SERVICE LINE" shall mean that part of the
horizontal pipine of the building drainage system
beginningg at the outside founuation wall and
terminating at Its connection with the sewage
system,
40, "SEWER" shall mean a pipe or conduit for carrying
wastewater,
41, "SEWAGE SYSTEM" shall mean all facilities which
are owned by the City of Denton for collecting,
carrying, treating and disposing of wastewater.
42. "SLUG" shall mean any discharge of wastewater
which in concentration of any given constituent or
In quantity of flow exceeds for any period of
duration longer than fifteen (15) minutes, more
than five (5) times the average twenty-four (24)
hour concentration of flow during normal operation.
43, "STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION" (SIC) shall
mean a classification pursuant to the Standard
Industrial Classification Manual Issued by the
Executive Office of the President of. the United
States, Office of Management and Budget, 1972, or
latest edition.
44. "STANDARD METHODS" shall mean the latest edition
of "Standard Methods for the Examination of. Water
and Wastewater" prepared and published Jointly by
the American Public Health Association, American
Waterworks Association and the Water Pollution
Control Federation,
45., "STATE" shall mean the State of Texas,
46. "STORM DRAIN" (sometimes termed "storm sewer")
shall mean a public drainage pipe which carries
storm and surface waters and drainage, but is not
intended to carry wastewater other than uneo).luted
cooling water,
PAGE FIVE
47 , "STOR.MWATER" shall mean rainfall or any other
forms of exoees water which are derived from
precipitation,
48, "SUSPENDED SOLIDS" shall mean solids that either
float on the surface of, or are In suspension In
water, wastewater, or other liquids, and which are
removable by acceptable laboratory procedures as
set forth in standard methods,
49, "TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS" shall mean the material
left In the vessel after evaporation of a sample
and its subsequent drying In an oven at a defined
temperature,
5u, "TOXIC SUBSTANCES" shall mean any substance
Whether gaseous, liquid or solid which, when
discharged to the Sanitary sewer in sufficient
concentrations, as determined by the Director of
utilities, may be hazardous to sewer maintenance
and personnel, tend to interfere with any
w
hazard astewater treatment process, or to constitute a
to ifemaor beings to create a i haaard tro rto inhibit
aquatic l
ecreation
in the receiving waters of the effluent from a
wastewater treatment plant,
$1, "TRANSPORT TRUCK DISCHARGE PERMIT" shall mean a
permit to deposit or discharge septic tank,
cesspool or seepage pit wastes into the city of
Denton sewage system,
$2, "TRAP" shall mean a device designed to skim,
settle, or otherwise remove grease, oil, sand,
flammable wastes, or other harmful substances from
wastewater before entering sewage system,
51, "USER CHARGE" shall mean a charge levied on users
of the Sewage system for the oapital cost, as well
as the operation and maintenance of such works as
set forth in the City of Denton Code of Ordinances,
54, "WASTE" shall mean rejected, unutillzed, or
tolIdf s
form resulsttiangefrom ndomliuid, estic, agricultural,
or industrial activities,
$5, "WASTEWATER" shall mean the water carried wastes
which are discharged into the sewage svstem,
$6, "WATER CLOSET" shall mean a compartment or room
equipped with toilet that is properly connected to
the sanitary sewer and has the means for
mechanical discharge.
SECTION 2S-133, ADMINISTRATION
Except as otherwise provided herein, the Director of
Utilities of the City of Denton, or his designee, shall
c
administer the provisions of this Article,
i
PAGE SIX
I
SECTIO14 25-134, PROCEDURES FOR ABATEMENT OF VIOLATIONS
1, 70t1ce +nd Order, Whenever the Alreotor of Utilities has
determined that any person has violated any provision of this
Article or that such violation is continuing, reoccurrina or may
reoccur, he may, in addition to any other remedy provided for in
this Article, Issue a notice and order directing that such
violation be Corrected or such other order as Is necessarv to
prevent the violation from continuing or reoccurring,
such notice and order shall stater
(a) The nature of the violation and the provisions of
this Article which have been violated,
It
(b) The cor,reotive action that must be taken to
correct or abate the violation.
(c) The amount of time within which the violation must
be corrected,
(d) That the person to whom the notice and order are
issued may appeal from the notice and order to the
Environmental Appeals Committee by filinq in
writing with the Director of Utilities an appeal
and filinq fee within ten ISO) days of the service
of the notice and order,
(e) That failure to comply with the notice and order
and failure to file a timely appeal may result In
termination of sewer service.
2. Service of Notice and OrdeAny notice and order
issued under this Article shall be in writing and served I.n
person or by registered or certified mail on the record user or
users of the sewage system or other persons determined to be
r
responsible for such violation.
3. Appeals. Any person may appeal the notice and order o!
the Director of Utilities by filing a written notice of appeal
with the Director of Utilities on forms provided by the Director
of Utilities and by paying a filing fee of $10,00, Snch npti.ce
of appeal shall be filed and filing fee paid within ten 110)
days of service of the order,
PAGE SEVEN
y
4, No Appeal riled, If no timely appeal and tiling fee are
filed, the Director of Utilities may, if a violation le
continuing or reoccurring or may reoeour, terminate sewer
service to the person ordered to correct or abate such violation
if such violation has not been corrected or abated within the
time specified In such order,
5. Bearing anO Determination
(al An Environmental Appeals Committee is hereby
established and authorized to hear and decide
appeals from any order issued by the Direotoc
of Utilities pursuant to said Article, 9lha
Committee shall be composed of the City
Manager, or Assistant City Manager, the
Director of Utilities and the City Attorney or
their designated representative,
(b) The Committee may call and hold hearfngs,
administer oaths, receive evidence at the
hearing, issue subpoenas to compel the
attendance of witlesses and the production of
papers and documents related to the hear 'Ing,
and make findings of fact and decisions with
respect to administering its powers herelA.
(c) Upon the hearing, the Committee shall determine
if there is substantial evidence to support the
Director of Utilities' determination and
order, The decision of the Committee shall be
in writing and contain findings of fact. If
the Committee determines that there is
substantial evidence to support the
determination and order of the Director of
Utilities, the Committee shall, In addition to
its decision, issue an order (1) requiring
discontinuance of such violation or condition,
(13) requiring compliance with any requirement
to correct or prevent anv condition or
violation, or (Ili) suspending or rvvokinp any
permit Issued under the Artfole,
(d) In any decision and order issued by the
Committee, the order shall specify the time In
which the compliance with the order must he
taken, A copy of the decision and order shall
be delivered to the appellant or person to whom
the order is directed in person or sent to him
by registered or certified mall.
(e) Should the appellant fail to comply with the
order of the Committee within the time
specified therein, if any, the Director of
utilities, in addition to anv other remedv
provided for in this Article, may terminate
sewage service to the appellant.
SECTION 25-135, PENALTIES
A person who violates any provision of this Article is
guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction is punishable by a
PAGE EIGHT
fine of up to Two Hundred Dollars ($200,001 for each act in
violation of any provision of this Article and for each day any
violation of this Article occurs,
in addition to proceeding under authority of suhsection (1)
of this section, the City is entitled to pursue all other
criminal and civil remedies to which it is entitled under
authority of statutes or ether ordinances against a person
continuing prohibited discharges or violating any other
i
provision of this Article.
SEC71ON 25-1364 DETERMINING THE CHARACTER AND CONCENTRATION
OP WASTEWATER
The wastewater discharged or deposited into the sewage
system shall be subject to periodic inspection and sampling as
often as may be deemed necessary by the Director of Utilities.
Sampling shall be conducted according to customarily accepted
methods, reflecting the effect of constituents upon the sewage
system and determining the existence of hazarda to hea).th, life,
limb, and property.
The examination and analyses of the characteristics of
waters and wastes required by this Article shall bei
(a) Conducted in accordance with the latmst edition of
"Standard Methods", and
(b) Determined from suitable samplois taken at the
control manhole provided or other control points
authorized by the City,
The determination of the character and concentration of
industrial/commercial wastewater shall be made by the Director
of Utilities at such times and on such schedules as may be
established by the Director of Utilities,
Any person determined to be discharging wastewater in
violation of this Article shall commensate the City for the cost
of sampling and monitoring the discharges until such time as the
discharged wastewater Is in compliance with this Artlc).s, The!
Director of Utilities shall determine the number of samples and
the frequency of sampling necessary to maintain surveillance of
the discharges.
PAGE NINE
SECTION 25-',37. APPROVAL OF PLANS, ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND
CERTIFICATION OF FINAL INSPECTION
1, sewage System Mork Permit Reeuiroj,, It shall be
unlawful for any user Of the sewage system to construct,
reconstruct, modify, enlarge or alter any equipment, device,
machinery apparatus or facility or system or component thereof,
which is used or is intended to be used to treat, process,
measure, or convey any wastewater which is or will be discharged
into the °sewage system without first obtaining a Sewage System
Work Permit from the Director of Utilities,
2. Reoultements for Permit, A Sewage System Work Permit
shall be issued when all plans, drawings and speclflcations are
submitted In such detail as the Director of Utilities may
require and the Director of Utilities has determined that the
work to be done will result in adequate treatment, pi'ocessinq,
measuring, and conveyance of the wastewater discharged Into the
sewage system in accordance with the provisions of this Article,
3. Oertificate of Final ImepeCtiOM uoon Completion
(a) Upon completion of the work to be done under
the Sewage System work permit, the Director of
Utilities shall Inspect the works and if done
In accordance with tht, permit, the Director of.
Utilities shall issue a Certificate of Final
Inspection to the permit holder,
(b) if the completed work does not comply with the
plans and speclflcations submitted for which
the permit was issued, the Director of
Utllitfos shall require such eocrection as
necessary before a Certificate of Inspection
is Issued.
(e) No person receiving a -"ewaoe System Work
Permit shall utilize or make use of any
equipment, device, machinery, apparatus or
facility covered by the permit until e
Certificate of Final Inspection Is Issued to
accordance with this Article,
4, Riaht to inspect, No person shall refuse the Director
of Utilities the right to Inspect any work done or required to
be dome under this Article,
SECTION 25-138, INSPECTIONS
Representatives of the City of Denton, the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Texas Department of Water Aesourees, amr)
PAGE TEN
the Tsxas State Health Department, of any successor agency
bearing proper credentials and identification, shall be
permitted to enter upon all properties for the purpose of
Inspection, observation, measurements, sampling and testing of
the sewnge system or any wastewater discharged into the sewage
system.
SECTION 25-139 thru SECTION 29-149, RESERVED
DIVISION 2
SANITARY FACILITIES REQUIRED
SECTION 25-150, CONNECTIONS REQUIRED
Any owner/occupant of every buildinq where such build nq is
within one hundred (100) feet of any City sanitarv sewer and is
utilized as a dwelling or residential unit shall construct, cr
cause to be constructed, a suitable water closet upon Ruch
property, and shall connect or cause the same to he connected
with such sanitary sewer In accordance with all ordinances of
the City regulating such construction and shall, within thirty
(30) days after writte) notice to do so from the Director of
Utilities, abate and cease to use any septic tank, dry closet,
or l,~rivey upon such premise.
Any owner/occupant of every building where such building is
within three hundred (300) feet of any City sanitary sewer and
is utilized as a business or commercial establishment
discharging wastewater exceeding the limits autahltshed by this.
Ordinance shall construct, or cause to be constructed, a
suitable water closet upon such property, and shall connect or
cause the same to be connected vlth such sanitary sewer in
accordance with all ordinr,r-1s o',' tie City requl.ating such
construotion and shall, within z+Irty (30) days after written
notice to do so from the Dit 7tor Utilities, abate and cease
to use any septic tank, dry closet, or privy upon such premise.
The owner or occupant of any such prooerty shall veeo and
maintain such water closet and all connections in good condition
and free from any obstructions,
PAGE ELEVEN