Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-22-1983_11-15-1983 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATES November 22, 1983 SUBJECT: Approve the institution of annexation pro- ceedings on approximately 1,125 acres of land located on both sides of Mayhill Road north of 1-35, (2.1613) SUMMARY: Continuation of the annexation process requires institution of annexation proceedings. ACTION REQUIRED: Move to institute annexation proceedings. ALTERNATIVES., 1. Move to Institute annexation proceedings. 2. Discontinue annexation proceedings. SOURCE OF FUNDS; Department Budgets RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. EXHIBITSi 1. Map 2. Ordinance 3. Service plan Char es 6 Watkins Senior Planner ' A ` [ . 4.4 '}S~,.k 1 . r J60 n - 01 37/ TAY V - j. ft ` i C 8 1 f" ~ l O Tip t ad a 1♦ r. f•-may P I 0 J Y 1 f 1 _ J J o,9- w r \ 3 ~ O S n r * 1: ~ J Jy ~ bb r SNORES • LeM ~ ~ y P q Pcysk9As04 • Ryan . • SnoO Lis\ R r • CORINTH' ';arlH ~Y I. i' • • POP 461 MOrY~ OreeY RI• . i- Fuson i t 3 / V r ly • ~ r LfjkwlM I ~ < ! 35 --J r ! ~ t,: •~~r~~ i ✓ i - } , f W J. . LAKE ~H JkL=261L Fit IcKORy LAK 9s - .c S r ' CREEK 1 I / ~DA LL JO y I ~~il~ J t POP I, AS• ' -sit &A 41 u'ti+ 4 - _ _4A; POPZI l ua J ~ • Q~(e hid~~fl ~Cy ~~~~~w \i ` 74 1 r« ~ ~ i I No, AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXA$t BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1125 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEINQ PART OF THE J. TAFT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1256, ,I, WHITE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1433, D, HOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 646, D. LAMBERT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 784, M,E,P, 6 P,R,R, SURVET, ABSTRACT NO, 950 AND THE 0. SU, CT NO 1330, TEXASI CLASSIFYINLGXERTHE RVSME ABASE AGRIN LTURAL D"A"ONDISTRIC+ PROPERTY? AND DECLARING AN PFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a reqular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of the city of Denton, Texasj and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the ~ day of r;c. , 1983 in tnd Council Chambers for all interestoo persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided oy this orainancei and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the clay of 1983 in the Council Chambers for 411T erested persons to state tnelr views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinances and WHEREAS, this ordinance has oeen published in full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective data, and after the public nearingsi NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY OROAINSI SECTION I, That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of otner citizens of said City and shall be bound by the acts ano ordinances of said City now in effect or which may nereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied by the City, The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit, All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the J. Taft Survey, Abstract No, 1256, J, White Survey, Abstract No. 1433, D, Hough Survey, Abstract No. 646, 0, Lambert Survey, Abstract No, 784, M,E,P, & P.R.A. Survey, Abstract No. 950 and the G, Walker Survey, Abstract No, 1330 and more particularly described as follows, BEGINNING at a p^lnt in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No, 65-43 Tract 11, said point also lying at the intersection of the east right-of-way line of Maynlll Road with a point 750 feet northeast of and perpendicular to the centerline of I.H. 3551 THENCE northwesterly Along said present olt'/! limits, 750 feet n0rtheasterly of and parallel with the centerline of I,H, 35E an approximate distance of 5612,8 feet to a point for a corner in tho present city limits, 'T'HENCE north 10421 east along the present city limits as estab- lished by Ordinance No, 80-38 a alstanoe of 917,4 feet to a corner said point lying 600 feet southeasterly of and perpen- dicular to the Southeast right-Of-Way line of Loop 2881 THENCE northeasterly along the present city limits as eatab- lished by Ordinance No, 65-43 Tract If 600 feet southeasterly of and parallel with the east right-of-way line of Loop 288 to tnm east boundary line of the J, Taft Survey, Abstract No. 1256 same being the west boundary line of the Cheek Survey, Abstract No, 3241 THENCE south 0054102" west along the present city limits as established by Oroinanoe No. 72 56 a distance of 939,60 foot to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of the said J, Cheek Survey) THENCE south 89411135" east along said present city limits, same bung the south boundary line of the said J. Cheek Survey, a distance of 601,2 feet to a point for a cornea THENCE north 89016120" east along said lines a distance of 359.44 feet to a point for a corne rl TNCNCE east alongg the present city limits as established by Ordinance No, 61-94 a distance of 2080,56 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in the Mayhill Road same being the west boundary line of the O. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 13301 THENCE north 'along said present city limits and the west boundary line of said Walker Survey, a distance of 1228.21 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE east along said present city limits a distance of 1817,08 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 1009'20" west along the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 83-18 a distance of 1308.77 feet to a point for a cornerl THENCE south 88415'45" east along said present city limits a distance of 792.29 feet to a point) THENCE south 87037154" east along said present city limits a distance of 831,02 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 1°41'08" west along said present city limits a distance of 541,96 feet to a point for a corners THENCE south 87611136" east along said present city limits a distance of 2405.17 feet to a point for a corner) THE14CE south along the east line of a tract conveyed to Bonnie E. Coonrod by dead recorded in Volume 432, Page 194 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, a distance of 1608 foot, more or less, to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said Coonrod tract) THENCE west along the south boundary line of saie Coonrod tract a oistance of 3a0 feat, more or lasa, to a point for a corner in the west boundary line of a north aou south county roan, known as SwxSner noael J THENCE south along distance of the west boundary 4186 feet, more or ,,,,line of said Swisher Road a loint for a cad said point being the intersection of a Point west D for y line of wseasit said Swisher her toad kad wth the nor tit boundary line of an east and nown as FOOkrue Roads THENCE west along the north boundary line of said Pookr'us Road, a distance of 4500 feet, more or less, to point for a cornet in- the resent city limits, as establisha ed by Ordinance No, 783A react 1 THENCE north 37448'04" west along said present city limits a distance of 382,6 feet to a point for a corners THENCE north 4406131" east along said present city limits a distance of 395,07 feet to a point for a cornett THENCE south 88°09'41" east along said present city limits a distance of 597,01 feet to a point for a corners THENCE north 4102126" east along said present city limits a distance of 1203,3 feet to a point for a corners distance oft 738 0109 feet tos a point9 for is corner, t pity limits a THENCE north 4434157" east along the present city limits as established by Ordinance No, 83-16, a distance of 735,64 feet to a point for a cornea THENCE south 67457130" east along said present city limits a distance of 28,94 Peet to,a point for a aornerl THENCE north 2406' easy along said present city limits a distance of 1154,4 feet to a point for a oorner! THENCE north 88429' west along said present city limits a distance of 1489,1 Fret to a point for a corners distances of 1140 z8 feet tosa point4for la oorner~t oily limits a distnacesoft719~12 feet toss pointgforLa cornerit pity limits a THENCE south l established by Ordinance not 78-388 a the present 46,68 feetttoaa point for a corner 31 said distancesoft66 feetlto we point for a coenereaent city limits a THENCE sou distance oft 885feetl l' toa pwest oint along for a osaid ornapi resent city limits a sou west distance of 1008Foet2to a pointlforr as corneresent city limits a THENCE south 50647150" west along said present city limits a distance of 196.49 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 36°39'30" west along said present city limits a distance of 339,84 fast to a point for a cornar7 PHENCE south 22434'40" west along said present city limits a distance of :51.74 fast to a point for a corners THENCE South 16040' west along said present city limits a distance of 615 feet to the place of beginning and Oontalning 1125 a0res of land, more or less, SECTION 11, The above described property is hereby classified as Agri- cultural "A" District and shall so appear on the Official zoning map of the City of DentOn, Texas, which map is hereby amendsd accordingly, SECTION 111, This ordinance shall be effeotive immediately upon its passage, Introduced before the City Council on the day of 19_,_,. 11 PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of 19 RICHARD , STE A , KAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE MEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYt BLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service; I, Basic Service Plan A, Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards, B, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation, C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code-of the City of Denton, Texas, D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. r Service [)Ian Annexed Areas Page two P, Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,) will begin on the effective date of annexation, (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will bo accomplished under the established policies of the city, G, Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, 1, Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J, Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power, w Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three MisoeIIaneou.u (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately o months after the effective date of annexation, II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The C.IP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as; (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the bal .,,ed growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics, The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city, Ci~Fy Cou,rci ~ Ajwlw A ~acktf November (5,195 AGENDA > CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL November 15, 1983 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 5;30 p,m. in the Civil De£ensa Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered; 5:30 p m, 1. Consider initiating annexation proceedings on a tract of land approximately 60 acres in size proposed for development of a manufactured housing subdivision or mobile horse park. The tract is located along the north side of the east-west section of F.M, 2181, 2. Discussion of new user fee rates in City of Denton, 3. Executive Session: A, Legal Matters Under Sea. 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252.17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under See. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, November 15 1983, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Auilding at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p m. 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of October 25, 1983. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Bids: 1. Bid b 9200 - Sectionalizer 2. Bid # 9201 - Annual maintenance on typewriter service city of Denton Clay Council Agenda' November 15, 1983 Page Two 3. Bid /1 9204 - Traffic controller 4, Bid # 9205 - Uniforms - Fire Department 80 Flats and Replats; 1. aApproval of nd 7, blocks p4, e Coll ge Appdditi n£ 1o`Thee Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 2. Approval of the preliminary plat o Denton County Co-op Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 3. Approval of the preliminary replat of lot it Adkisson Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the preliminary p1At of the Cozy Oaks Addition. (The Plannin and Zoning Commission recommends approval.l 5. Approval of the final replat of lots 1R, 2R and 3R) Independence Square Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) C, Change Orders: 11 Consider approval of Change Order #15, Bid # 8753, Purchase Order 43458 to Graoon Construction Company, Wastewater Treatment Plant, limitorque motor control and project time extension. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) 21 Consider approval of Change Order #1, Bid 11 9138, Purchase Order 5171 to Dickerson Construction Company. 3. Public Hearings; A. H-29. This is petition of the Greater Denton Irt`s Council requesting historic landmark zoning designation at the southeast corner of ( Bell Avenue and Hickory Street. The property is the location of the old City of Denton warehouse and machine shop and is more particularly described as lots 1 through 8 of the Railroad Addit n. (The Historin Landmark Commission and the~anning and zoning Commission recommends app rovaI.) City ooE Denton City Council Agenda November, 15, 1983 Page 't'hree 1. Adoption of an ordinanc2 approving historic landmark (H) zoning des gnation at the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Hickory Street, b, H-30. This is the petition of the Greater Denton YIrts Council requesting historic landmark (Et) zoning designation at the southwest corner of Bell Avenue and Hickory Street, The property is the lonation of the old City of Denton power plant, (The Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance appproving historic landmark (H) zoning designation at the southwest corner of bell Avenue and Hickory Street. C. H-31, This is the petition of Douglas and Lynn E e cola requesting historic landmark (H) zoning designation at 630 Grove Street, The property is more particularly described as lot 1, block 20 of the Woodland Addition. (The Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Adoption of an ordinance approving historic landmark (H) zoning designation at 630 Grove Street. D, 5-175, This is the petition of Richard B, `Cushman requesting a specific use permit to locate an individual mobile home in a commero:al C) zoning district. The property totals approximately one acre in size and is located along the north side of Spencer Road, approximately 404 feet west of Loop 288. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a specific use permit to locate an individual mobile home on property located along the north side of Spencer Road, approximately 404 feet west of Loop 288. E. Z-1614. This is the petition of Tom D. ,jester, r-7- questing a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to the light industrial (LI) classification at 316 Frame Street. The property is located on the east side - of Frame Street approximately 250 feet north of East McKinney Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial.) ity of Denton City Council Agenda ovember, 15, 1983 Page Four F, Z-1615, This is vile petition of Toro Fouts reqsting a change in zoning from agricultural (A)ueto Comroeroial (C) on an approximately 6,769 acre tract in the A. Hill Survey, Abstract 623, The property is located approximately 8pn feet west of Teasley Lane on the south side of tht: 1-35E service road between Teasley Lane and Sam Hass Road. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 11 Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to commercial (C) on propbrt located approximately 800 feet west of Teasley Lane on the south side of the 1.35E service road between Teasley Lane and Sam Bass Road. 4. Ordinancesi A. C new onsider adoption of an ordinance establishing weed user e cutting,atLibrary,18 perks oanduiRecreation, Public Works, barricade inspections, fire inspections, ambulance service, platting and zoning fees, sign permits, Animal Control, and Police services in the City of Denton. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance regarding the Texas Municipal Retirement System updated service credits and increased retirement annuities. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance making the frontage roads on 1-35 one-way from U.S. 77 north to the City limits. D, Consider adoption of an open container ordinance ' for the City of Denton. E. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning an easement, lot 9, block A, Willowwood Addition, 2030 Golf Court. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) F. Consider adoption of an annexation ordinance and service plan for a tract of land approximately 150.5 acres in size beginning at the intersection of FM 426 and Mayhill goad, and extending easterly 250 feet either side of the centerline of FM 426 for a distance of appproximately 3,000 feet and including a 104 acre tract on the north side of FM 426. (Z-1590) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) CJ-Cy of Denton Ctty Council Agenda November 15, 1983 Page Hive 5. Public Hearings S-174, This is the petition of Champion Home o~unil•1,es, Inc. rEquesting approval of a specifio use permit for a mobile home park on a 104.28 acre tract located adjacent and north of EM 426 (Bast McKinney) and adjacent and south of Mills Road, and beginning approximately 3,000 feet east of Mayhill Road. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Consider approval of the request of Mr. Paul Barry to be3in disannexation proceedings on approximately 4.39 acres of land located along the east side of Highway 377 ust north of Brush Creek Road. (THIS ITEM SHOULD BB RiMOVED FROM THE. TABLE PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION.) A, Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning the proposed disannexation of approximately 4.39 acres of land located on the east side of Highway 377, north of Brush Creek Road. 7. Reoolutions; A, Consider approval of a resolution in support of a grant application to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 8. Discussion of an amendment to the General Telephone franchise ordinance. 9. Consider approval of an agreement with the Town of Little Elm for the holding of animals at the City of Denton Animal Control Center, 10. Consider approval of extending water and sewer services outside the City limits to R. 0. McDonald. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) 11. Consider approval of an extension for the option agreement with P&B Contractors, Inc., for the diesel plant. sale. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) 12. Consider approval of participation in an oversize waterline (12") for Champion Mobile Home Park (East McKinney Street near Mayhill Road.) (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) CIV of Denton City COUnoi1 Agenda November 15, 1963 Page six 134 Consider approval of partioi stion in an oversize waterline (20") to service Denton County Elaotxio Cooperative, Ina, on Loop 288 and associated pro rata agreement. (The Public Utility board w,t1l consider this item at their meeting on November 14,) 14, Discussion on the impact of growth on Denton's Wastewater Treatment Plant oapacity. 15, Consider authorizing the City Mang or to enter into an agreement with Arthur Andersen to develop a fixed asset inventory system. 16, Official Action on Executive Session Items; A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 17. New Businessi This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas, CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1983 at1`_5- o'clock (a.m.) CITY SECRETARY 1087C EMERGENCY AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL November 151 1983 Nebulae Meeting November 15, of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday , 1983, at 7100 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room ok the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered; 1. Consider approval of a resolution granting approval for the Denton County Housing Finance Corporation to provide financial assistance with respect to purchasing, improving, and constructing homes located within the corporate limits of the City of Denton. CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 41) /PI , 1983 at ' r--- -----~.1 =3 J.-~ o'clock (a.m. p gym.) CITY SECRETARY 1098C EMERGENCY AGENDA ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL November 15, 1983 Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday the©Mu Nov15, ember l3 '14ng 7a00 which In the following Defense Items will be considered: 1. Consider approval of a resolution granting approval for the Denton County Housing Finance Corporation to provide financial assistance with respect to purchasing, improving, and constructing homes located within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1983 at o'clock (a.m.) (p,m.) CITY SECRETARY 1098C AGENDA CITY OF DkNTON CITY COUNCIL November 150 1983 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday November 15, 1983, at .5:30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room ok the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. it Consider initiating annexation proceedings on a tract of land approximately 60 acres in size proposed for development of a manufactured housing subdivision or mobile home park. The tract is located along the north side of the east-west section of P.M. 2181. 24 Discussion of new user fee rates in City of Denton. 3. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 62.52-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.,r,s. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, November 15 1983, at 7:00 p.m* in the Council Chambers of the Municipal building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 16 Approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of October 25, 1983. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Bids: 1. Bid # 9200 - Sectionalizer 2. Bid # 9201 - Annual maintenance on typewriter service City of Denton City Council Agenda November. 15, 1983 Page Two 3. Bid # 9204 - Traffic controller. 4. std # 9205 - Uniforms - Fire Department B. Plats and Replatst 14 Approval, of the preliminary rep lat of lots 6 and 70 block 40 College Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the preliminary plat of Denton County Co-op Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of the preliminary replat of lot 11 Adkisson Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Cozy Oaks Addition. (The Plannin and Zoning Commission recommends approval.5 5. Approval of the final replat of lots lR, 2R and 3R, Independence Square Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Change Orders: 1. Consider approval of Change Order #15, Bid 11 8753, Purchase Order 43458 to Gracon Construction Company, Wastewater Treatment Plant, limitorque motor control and project time extension. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) 2. Consider approval of Change Order 1110 Bid 11 9138, Purchase Order 58171 to Dickerson Construction Company. 3. Public Hearings: A. H-29. This is the petition of the Greater Denton Xr'ta Council requesting historic landmark (H) zoning designation at the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Hickory Street. The property is the location of the old City of Denton warehouse and machine shop and is more particularly described as lots 1 through 8 of the Railroad Addition. (The Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda November. 15, 1983 Page Three 1. Adoption Ion ordinance a proving historic Ian mark zoning designation at the southeast corner of Bell Avenue and Hickory Street. B. H-30. This is the petition of the greater Denton Arts' Council requesting historic landmark (H) zoning designation at the southwest corner of Hell Avenue and Hickory Streeto The property is the location of the old City of Denton power plant, (The Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and "Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Adoption of an ordinance approving historic landmark (H) zoning designation at the southwest corner of Bell Avenue and Hickory Street. C. H-31. This is the petition of Douglas and Lynn Mersole requesting historic landmark (H) zoning designation at 630 Grove Street, The t~roperty is more particularly described as lot 1, block 2, of the Woodland Addition. (The Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 14 Adoption of an ordinance approving historic landmark (H) zoning designation at 630 Grove Street. D. S-175. This is the petition of Richard H. Cushman requesting a specific use permit to locate an individual mobile home in a commercial C) zoning district. The property totals approximately one acre in size and is located along the north side of Spencer Road, approximately 404 feet west of Loop 288. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 11 Adoption of an ordinance approvin a specific use permit to locate an individual mobile home on property located along the north side of Spencer Road, approximately 404 feet west of Loop 288. E. Z-16146 This is the petition of Tom D. Jester, rr.rerequesting a change in zoning from singgle family (SF-7) to the light industrial (L t) classification at 316 Frame Street. The property is located on the east side of Frame Street approximately 250 feet north of East McKinney Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial.) i City of Denton City Counotl Agenda November, 15, 1983 Page Four, p. Z-1615. This is the petition of Tom Fouts zequa changa in zoning from agricultural (A) to commercial (C) on an approximately 6.769 acre tract in the A. Hill Survey, Abstract 623. The property is located approximately 800 feet west of Teasley Lane on the south side of the 1-35E service road between Teasley Lane and Sam Bass Road. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 14 Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to commercial (C) on property located approximately 800 feet west of Teasley Lane on the south side of the 1-35H service road between Teasley Lane and Sam Bass Road. 4. Ordinances; A. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing new user fee rates in the areas of building fees, weed cutting, Library, Parks and Recreation, Public Works, barricade inspections, fire inspections, ambulance service, platting and zoning fees, sign permits, Animal Control, and Police services in the City of Denton. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance regarding the Texas Municipal Retirement System updated service credits and increased retirement annuities. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance making the frontage reads on 1-35 one-way from U.S. 77 north to the City limits. D. Consider adoption of an open container ordinance for the City of Denton. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning an easement, lot 9, block A, Willowwood Addition, 2030 Golf Court. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November. 14.) F. Consider adoption of an annexation ordinance and service plan for a tract of land approximately 150.5 acres in size beginnin at the intersection of FM 426 and Mayhill Road, and extending easterly 250 feet either side of the centerline of FM 426 for a distance of appproximately 3,000 feet and including a 104 acre tract on the north side of FM 426. (Z-1590) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) • City of Denton Clay Council Agenda November 153 1983 Page rive 51 Public Hearings This This is the petition of Champion Home om unities, Inc, requesting approval of a specific use permit for a mobile homo park on a 104.28 acre tract located adjacent and north of FM 426 (East McKinney) and adjacent and south of Mills Road, and beginning approximately 3,000 foot east of Mayhill Road. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 6, Consider approval of the request of Mr. Paul Berry to begin disannexation proceedings on approximately 4.39 acres of land located along the east side of H,i,gghwayy 377 REMOVED FROM HErTABLE PRIOR TO CONS1IDIERATION.~HOULD A, Adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings concerning the proposed disannex~~tion of approximately 4,39 acres of land located on the east side of Highway 377, north of Brush Cree~ Road. 7. Reaolutionsi A. Consider approval of a resolution in support of a grant application to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 8. Discussion of an amendment to the General Telephone franchise ordinance. 9. Consider approval of an agreement with the Town of Little Elm for the holding of animals at the City of Denton Animal Cqntrol Center. 10. Consider approval of extending water and sewer services outside the City limits to R. 0. McDonald. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) 11. Consider approval of an extension for the option agreement with P&B Contractors, Inc., for the diesel plant sale, (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) 12. Consider app xoval of participation in an oversize waterline (12 ) for Champion Mobile Home Park (East McKinney Street near Mayhill Road.) (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14.) City of Denton City Council Agenda November 15, 1983 Page Six 130 Consider aperoval of partioi ation to an overaixe waterline (2011) to service Denton County Electric Cooperative, Ina, on Loop 288 and associated pro rata agreement. (The Public Utility Board will consider this item at their meeting on November 14,) 14, Discussion on the impact of growth on Denton's Wastewater Treatment Plant capacity, 154 Consider authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Arthur Andersen to develop a fixed asset inventory system, lb, official Action on Xxeoutive Session Items; A. Legal Matters B, Real Estate C, Personnel D. Board Appointments 17. New Businessi This item provides a section for. Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Mall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1983 at o'clock (a.m.) (p.m.) CITY SECRETARY 1087C 1 r M E M O R A N D U M DATEi November 15, 1983 M G. Chris Hartung, City Manager ROMI Charles Watkins, Senior Planner WWW REi Consider initiating annexation proceedings on a tract land approximately 60 acres in size proposed for develop- ment of a manufactured housing subdivision or mobile home park. The tract is located along the north side of the east-west section of F.M. 2181, A mobile home subdivision with lots approximately 6000 square feet in size is being proposed on this tract, The developers intend to serve the sub- division with city sewer and may also serve it with city water by extending the existing line at Lakewood Estates to this location. The developers indicate that if they are unable to develop a mobile home subdivision then they would like to develop a mobile home park at this location, A City of Denton finger annexation is located on or near this property. Mile RYAN RD lCKQ8 CREEK- - II I I~ die 1 Lam...... w......J.. w.~.. r..,l ..-y.. .J.J.. T ...1 D CITY of KWON, Tl XAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DEN TON, TEXAS 76101 / TELEPHONE (8171566.8100 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M T0; Mayor and City Council Members FROM., Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE; November 10, 1983 SUBJECTi User Fee Survey Analysis The following information was prepared as an uppdate of *the financial impact of the user fee rates being considered by the Council and to provide you information conoerning advisory board actions. This report was prepared based on new revenue estimates in the areas of animal control and parks and recreation. If the new rates proposed by the staff are approved, the following financial impacts are expected to occur; o The city will recover approximately 55% of the costs for delivering services related to fees in the ordinance, instead of the 28% currently being recovered. , o A total of $599,648 or 95% of the $633,420 in new revenue listed in the FY 83-84 budget can be recovered with the approval of the staff recommendations. This amount is the sum of $370,908 (staff proposed increase being considered in the ordinance) and $228,740 in other revenue increases projected for this year (i,e., street cuts - $195,131; parks and recreation contract classes - $15,000; animal control citations - $10,000; and Williams Square parking - $8,609). The following table reflects the financial impact of the new rates. Page 2 User Fee Survey Analysis FINANCIAL IMPACT OF NEW RATES, Current Staff Fees Proposal Total Revenue Created by Fees in the Ordinance $ 371,778 $ 742,686 Percent of Service Cost Recovered by User Fees in the Ordinance 28% 55% Full Recovery Cost of Ordinance Related Fee Services $f03560040 $1$56,040 The additional revenue produced by the new fees will allow the City to provide $106,077 in new programs which were approved in the FY 83-84 Budget. This revenue will provide the city with a right-of-way inspector, code enforcement, animal control registration, fire prevention, and funds to pay for expert testimony to provide planning assistance for sign ermits. To provide these services and avoid a need to consider a tax increase, the staff proposals are recommended for adoption by the City Council. The following section provides you with the advisory board action on the staff proposed rates. Fire. Police, Animal Control, Engineering No boards to consider fees in these areas. Parks and Recreation In a meeting on October 31, 1983 the Board officially approved the staff recommendations to be sent to the Council. The Parks and Recreation Board by a 3 to 2 vote approved an increase in children swimming fees. Library Board The Library Board unanimously approved an increase from $25 to $35 for fees charged to non-Denton County users of the Library, Page 3 User Fee Survey Analysis Historic Landmark Comm s§ion Since people are not seeking commercial gain for Historic Landmark requests, the Commission unanimously recommended against increasing this type of free from $25.00. Planning & Zoning Fees The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a 6 to 1 vote, recommended the adoption of the proposed staff fee increases to be phased in over a five year period, Board of Adjustment The Board voted unanimously not to oppose or take a position on the rate increase on the Board of Adjustment fee. Builder Code Board In reviewing the proposed sign fees, the Board approved an increase of fees based on a square foot method of inspection by a vote of three to one. The Curb-Cut fee was increased to $12.75 by the Board on a three to one vote compared to the staff proposal of $50.59. The Certificate of Occupancy fees were considered and the Board unanimously approved an increase in the fee to $18.50. Electric Code Board This Board failed to make a recommendation at the October 27, 1983 meeting. They were scheduled to discuss the proposed fees in a meeting on November 9, 1983. We will consider the rate increases at the 5;30 p,m. work session. The Council is scheduled to take action on the approval of a User Fee Ordinance at the 7;00 p.m. Council meeting. A5 guk~ etty Mc Kea Assi.stant C ty Manager 1481M i CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM T0: 'rho Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: Sill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant DATE: November 10, 1983 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM - CONTRACT FOR AIRPORT MANAGEMENT SERVICES I have included for your consideration copies of the proposed contract with Texas Airport Management Services (TAMS) and an analysis of this contract which contains the staff's recom- mendation to the Airport Advisory Board, The Airport Advisory Board considered this item at the special called meeting of November 10, 1983. After considerable discussion, the Board voted 5 to 0 with 1 abstention to recom- mend to the city Council that the contract not be approved and that the City should employ its own airport manager. Should you have any questions or comments on this matter, please let us know. Respectfully submitted, Bill Angels; BA/jm • AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONTRA'- THE STATE OF TEXAS S KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF DENTON S This agreement is made and entered into this day of 19__-_,, between they City of Denton, Texas, hereinafter referred to as Denton, and Texas Airport Management Sorvioa, hereinafter referred to as TAMS, WHEREAS, Denton maintains and operates a Municipal Airportt and WHEREAS, Denton is in need of the services of a qua),ified group to manage and operate such airport and provide assistance and future planning and expansion of said Municipal Airportt and WHEREAS, TAMS is in the business of planning, developing and managing Municipal Airport facilities and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be of mutual advantage to Denton and to TAMS to enter into this Airport Management Contract under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Now, therefore, for and in • consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, it is mutually agreed as follows I. Denton does hereby engage TAMS for the development and manage msnt of the Municipal Airport for the City of Denton, Texas, and TAMS does hereby accept and agree to perform such services, II. DUTIES OF TAMS TAMS agrees that its duties in developing and managing the Municipal Airport shall consist of the following: 1. Provide a full-time manager and continual supervision of the Municipal Airport including twenty-four (24( hour emergency coverage of Municipal Airport operations 2. Formulate policies and plane governing operational and maintenance functions at the Municipal Airports 3. Supervise emergency services 4. Supervise the safe, efficient and continuous operational use of the Municipal Airport's runways, taxiways, aprons and other operational areas 5. Supervise comprehensive maintenance services for all facilities and equipment operated by the Municipal Airports TAMS/AIRPORT MANAGEMENT CONIAACT-PAGE ONZ, 1 1 , . 6, Estimate the required funding and personnel requirements necessary for operation and maintenance of the Municipal Airports 7, Forraulate the development of operational and maintenance standards for the Municipal Airporti 8, idantity and recommend to Denton of any improvements or moderoi2ation necessary) 9. Assist in negotiation of all leases and the enforcement of the provisions of such leases. Collect all fees owed Denton by the Lessees) 10, Promote business expansion at the municipal Airport, seek new tenants and develop property) 11, Seek and assist in the coordination of all Federal Aviation Administration and Texas Aeronautics Commission urantsI 12. Enforce all ground facilities, policies and procedures) 13, oversee all air show operations in the best interest of Denton) 14, Represent Denton to all transient persons and act as host to all persons using the Municipal Airport) 15. issue notams as necessary for the protection of Dentonf 16. Supervise and coordinate the removal of aircraft • osbstructing runway so as to keep the Municipal Airport operational) 17. Advise Denton and the FAA of any malfunctions at the Municipal Airport which would affect its safe and efficient user 18, Plan, coordinate, and direct any construction activity or engineering work relating to maintenance or construction work at the Municipal Airport. Enforce standards of construction and make recommendations concerning construction by lease holdersr 19, Coordinate all City of Denton and Municipal Airport activities with the FAA and TAC on various aspects of airport managements 20. Assist Denton in the preparation of all grant proposals relating to the Municipal Airports 21, Assist all law enforcement agencies on related items. Coordinate all security and police protection at the municipal Airports 22, Develop Municipal Airport plans, programs and facilities to produce maximum revenue and render optimum service to tenants, passengers and.to the general public) 23. Develop and implement a progressive industrial relations program, public relations policies, and promote general interest to the local communitys 24, Develop a master tariff plan which would yield appropri- ate economic returns from Municipal Airport propertiess • 25. Develop and administer a comprehonslve program of blunicipal~ Airport rights-of-say and rental lane and TAMS/AIkPOkT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT-PAGE TWO WON t • provide studios ano recommendations oonoerning Munioipal Airport real estate activities, 26. Establish work procedures and oonduot negotiations with agents of utility and other companies, and 27, Develop a criteria to be used In setting up a fixed base operation by an outside party so as to best benefit Denton, IX. COMPENSATION In return for the services performed by TAMS, Denton agrees to pay to TAMs as compensation for such services the sum of Twenty-Six Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($26,400.00) per year, prorated monthly, or twenty percent (20!) of the gross annual revenues whichever is greater. in determining gross revenue all revenue generatea by the Municipal Airport shall be inoluded, with the exclusion of sales tax, ad valorem property taxes, and any compensation Denton should receive for mineral rights on Munioipal Airport property, Should the agreement be extended for subsequent . years TAMS would receive a percentage increase of the base fee which would be equal to the average cost of living increases given City employees, ITI, TERM OF THE CONTRACT This agreement shall continue in force and effect or a period of years from , 14 to 19 unless terminated earlier by either party as hereinafter provided, A. This agreement may be terminated by either party hereto for just cause upon sixty days (60) written notice given to the other, B. Upon termination of this agreement, TAMS shall not remove any files, maps, books, publications, records, or other Denton property from the Municipal Airport other than the personal property of TAMS or its employees. The rights of TAMS to any compensation which accrued prior to any termination under Paragraph II above shall not be divested by such termination, IV, REPORTING • TAMS shall regularly attend Airport Advisory Board meetings and aduise tite.Board. on.matters of- concern to the Airport Advisory Board, :1AMb/AIRPOk1 :;ANAGEMENT COK7F;ACT-P.4GL' THREE . on 411 matters relevant to the use and operation of the Municipal Airport, its land and facilities, TAMS, through itsAirport Manager, shall report directly to toe City manager or his designee. No less often than annually, the City staff shall prepare a formal evaluation of the services being provided by TAMS and make any recommendations for changes or improvements In such ssrVioes, The evaluation will be submitted to the Airport Advisory Board for their consideration. Upon approval of the Board the evaluation and any recommendations will be formally communicated to the City Council and to TAM$, V. DUTrES OF DENTON To enable TAMS to properly carry out its duties under this contract, Denton agrees to provide the following) 1. A suitable office and office equipment for the Municipal Airport Manager to administer the Municipal Airports 2. Office supplies for the Airport Manager's offices . 3. Storage space for necessary maintenance equipment and suppliess 4. City maintenance employees as necessary, with a minimum of one (1) full time employee, to report directly to the Airport Manager. Should such employee not be needed for maintenance operations then the activities of such employee may be redirected by the City Manager or his designee. 5. Necessary maintenance equipment and supplies, including a vehicle for use by the Municipal Airport staff, 6. Necessary auxiliary management servioes, such as management reports, finance and accounting assistance, data processing assistance, and other services deemed necessary, 7. Reimbursement of travel expenses to the Airport Manager for trips deemed necessary by the City staff.' VII. MISCELLANEOUS A. TAMS shall have no authority to bind, obligate, or commit 'Denton by any promise or representation, unless specifically authorized by Denton in writing in a particular transaction, a. This agreement may not be assigned, sold or otherwise . conveyed by either party. The failure of any party hereto to enforce at any time any of the provisions or terms of this agreement snali hoe be -oonstruea--to 'be 'e waiver of suon provision or term, nor TAI-WAIRPOAT i9i,liAG'EPi NT C0i;;kAC -PAGE POUk of the right of the party thereafter to enforce such term or provision, C, If any action at law or in equity is brought by either of the parties hereto, it is expressly agreed that the party in whose favor final judgment shall be entered shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable attorneys fees in addition to any other relief which may be awarded, D. This agreement shall be interpreted by the laws of the state of Texas and all obligations hereunder are performable in Denton County, Texaa, E. All notices provided for under this agreement shall be in writing and shall be sufficient If sent by certified mail to the addresse's of the parties hereto as set forth under the signatures on the last page herein or to Such other address as shall be designated in writing to the other party, F, Time is of the essence in this agreement. 0. This agreoment constitutes the entire agreement between TAMS and Denton, and there are no agreements or understancings concerning such agreement which are not set forth herein, if any provision of this agreement is invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, the other provisions herein shall remain in full force and effect and shall be liberally construed in order to effectuate the purpose and intent of this agreement. WITNESS THE S:ORATURES OF THE PARTIES HEREIN, this the day of 19~. TA14S CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY, BYt RICHARD 0, TEWART, MAYOR P. 0, BOX 61463 215 EAST MCKINNEY STREET DPW AIRPORT, TEXAS 75261 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ATTESTi ATTEST, SECRETARY CAA LOTT AL E14 CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TAMS/AIRPORT MANAGE;SENT CO\TRACr-PAGE FIVE I 1 I CIA OF D17NTON MF;pI01tr1NDi1M If O; The Chairman and Members of the Airport Advisory Board FROM; hill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistnnt DATE; November 9, 1983 SUBJECT; AIRPORT MANAGLMM CONTRACT As you know, we have recently received a proposal from Texas Airport Management Services (TAMS) for the continuation of the Airport Management Contract which was approved by the Council last year, In essence, TAMS Is roquestIng a five yoar contract with a base rate increase of $200 per month. In addition, the proposal calls for annual percentage increase equal to the cost of living increase used by the City of Denton. Other than these items, tho contract would remain identical to the exlsti.ng contract, Rased upon this proposal, the annual cost of this contract for the first year would be $26,400. The cost of the contract in future years would be dependent on the cost of living adjustmont given to City employees each year and .is+unprodictable at this time. As in the previous contracts, the City is required to pay the base foe or 20% of gross revenues, which- over is higher. This 20% fee would go into effect when gross revenues at the airport exceed $132,000. TANS has requested a five year contract, but has indicated n willingness to settle for less if the City so desires, The reasoning behind this request relntos to basic ,job security for the person filling the position of airport manager, In essenco, TAMS feels that they would be in a better position to recruit and retain competent employees if they could offer multi-yoar employment, TAMS feels that the one year term coutnined in the existing contract does not appear to afford them the nucossary job security to retain these employees, 4 one of my primary concerns relative to the THIS contract concerns the issue of job security and compensation for the person occupying the position of airport manager, Although we currently pay TMIS $24,0011 a year for this service, the airport manager is receiving only $14,000 per year as an employee with 'DAMS, Additionally, TANS does not offer any employee benefits for the manager. Given this low salary and the lack of bonefits, I am very concerned about. TAMS' ability to retain a eompotent individual in this position. AIRPORT PIANAGEMN'f roNTRAt'r November 9, 1983 Page 2 As you know, last Play, Mr, Tommy Jones vacated the position of airport manager to pursuo it better opportunity, T am confident that the current airport manager will also be leaving in the near future as a result of low pay and no benefits, In essence, I believe it will be impossible for TANS to maintain the amploymont of any competoat individual as airporL manager under those cireumstances. I am very concerned regarding the impact that constant change will have oil the airport. I am also concerned solative co the so-called benefits offered to the City by mnnnyament by conLract as compared to a City omployod mnnagor, When this contract wits orl£;inally adopted, we considered management by contract to have several advtlntages over a City omployyed airport manager. These advantages included; 1. Lower initial coal, 2. Twenty-Cour hour, 365 day per year coverage. 3. Expertise or a management toam (3 persons), 4, Greater incentive to develop the airport, We also considered this type of management to have some disadvantages over a City employed airport manager. Those disadvantages includa; 1. Lack of direct supervisory control by City Administration. 2. Administrative problems concerning supervision of airport maintenance employee and expenditures of City funds, 3, profit sharing which could lend to higher cost (20% of Gross Revenues), While these disadvantages continue to exist, 1 feel that the advantages have decayed somewhat over the years, The following is it brief summary of those errociing advantages, Lower Initial Cost During the last few months, I have prepared and submitted to the Personnel Department a job description for the position of airport manager. The Personnel Department has reviewed the position and has classified and ranked the position in our compensation plan relative to other positions with similar responsibilities, The position has ranked out in the P9inagement/Super- vision job family at a P1-3 classifi.ention. The salary range at this level is $18,720 to $28,121,60 annually, I would nssume that we would be able to bring in an airport mnnagar at it starting salary of approximately $20,000 per year. After six months, the employee would be eligible for a SG increase: based upon satisfactory performance as determined through a formal performance evaluation. The total cost of this position including AIRPORT MANACKMISNT CONTMCT Novombor 9, 1983 Page 3 the morit increase and bonefits for thu lnltial year of employmont would be as follows; 6 was, Salary @ $20,000 par year $10,000 6 mos. salary @ $21,000 per year 10,500 Bonofits @ 21,87 of annual salary 4,469 TOTAL COST x$24,969 Rasod ,pon these numbers, it is apparent thn} the cost of tho TAMS contract would be some $1,431 more during the next c„lendar year, 'fetsl Oovertigo Initially, we felt that the TAPIS contract offered 24 hour per clay, 365 days a year coverage for the airport dale to the team management approach, This total. coverago does not appear to be happening. During the last fow years, when the airport maiiagur has gone on vacation, TAMS has not placed another individual at tho airport; however, they have said that one of the partners would be available by phone if neodod, This last May, while Tommy Jones was away train the airport, a situation srose which required that i call for assistance from Herb Fisher, Upon placing; the call, we discovered' that Mr, Fishor was also out of town and unavailable to assi,'a us, Thereforo, I do not fool that this issue is really as advantage to the City, I~ertisc~ of a Dian_algetnent Team Originally, we thought that the participation of the other partners in TAMS would offer the City the expertise of throe persons knowledgeable in airport operations. As you are aware, our primary contact has been with the person filling the airport manager'e position, and there hes been very little active involvement by the other partners in TAMS. I would seriously question the real advantage of this issue bssed upon our past experience, Greater incentive to Develop the Airlort The 201 of gross revenue fee does provide some additional incentive to develop the airport due to the profit sharing approach. Although this incentive has existed since the, execution of the.eontract, we have seen very little additional development at the airport. This is not to say that the lack of development is totally the fault of TAMS, but it does raise some questions regarding the validity of this advantage, 14 ♦1 AIRPORT WNAGOWNT CONTRACT' November 91 1983 PA80 4 Overnll, I feel that TANS has performed ndequatoly for the city of Denton in most arena; however, I feel that we should seriously consider n chango in management for the Denton Municipal Airport, Based upon the provious discussion relative to the turnover of managors, and the disadvantages of the contract management, T would recommend ngainst tho approval of the contract. and for tho switch to a City employed airport manager, ~I Dill Aiig.elo BA/se A CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 251 1989 The City Council and the Flow Memorial Hospital Board of Directors convened into a joint mooting at $0p a.m, in tho Modall'ion Room at Flow Hospital to disouss Flow femoral Hospital, COUNCIL PRESENTi Mayor Richard Stewart; Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespergerl Council Members Alford, Barton, Chow, Hopkins and Stephens City Manager, City Attorney, and City Secretary FLOW BOARD PRESENTi Chairrpperson Mary Wtlliama; Members Don Holt, Ralph Havenhiil, Dan Trammell, and Bradley Moore Hospital Administrator Jeffrey Hausler and Gloria MadoweII Mayor Stewart introduced Chairperson Williams and opened the discussion for questions, Council Member Hopkins asked Chairperson Williams if she wished to make any comments prior to questions, Is, Williams stated that this was a very ohallongin and exciting time for the hospital and the Hospital Board intended to "take the bull by the horns and go", Counuil Member Barton asked if the Board was working on a 5 year plan. Administrator Hausler reported that a 12 month short term plan was being formulated first and that the managers were getting their thoughts together for 9, 51 and 10 year plans, Council Member Stephens asked how this was progressing. Haualer responded that the 12 month plan was almost completed. A loommittee had been formed to finalize this short term plan and they would then move into the 9, 5 and 10 year plan formulation, Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council wanted to meet with the Board to gather information end asked the Hoard to address the topics of the health care plan, the indigent care program, the financial situation of Flow, plena for the Euture (including expansion of the hospital and/or a physician's professional building) and present plans, if the hospital's philosophy had changad, the equipment situation, information on the mid-wife program and the present patient-ratio. Mr, Hausler stated that the HMO contract was signed in 1981 and came up for automatic annual renewal. This particular subject had been A topio of discussion with quite a lot to be considered. The Board was continuing in a discussion mode and had tabled any immediate action. Council Member Hopkins asked if Flow would be treating these patients, Hausler responded yea, chairperson Williams stated that this issue had been raised at the last Flow Hospital Board meeting because several big companies had been approached. Mr. Hausler added that this would be a significant factor in the future. • City Counoil Minutes Meeting of October 2$, 1983 Pago Two Mayor Pro Tem Riddlesperger asked if the organization of another HMO for this institution was anticipated, Mr, Hausler responded no. Chairperson Williams stated that a possibility did exist for PPO. Mr, Haulser explained that an HMO was an organization which marketed medical services to patrons by contract to subscribers, such as North Texas State University. The subscribers using the service had no choice of the physician which they would see. A PPO1 or Preferred Provider organization, was an organized group of phyaicians who would offer discounts on medical services to subsoribers, These medical services were root prepaid. Council Member Hopkins asked how the doctors felt about this. Mr. Hausler responded that there seemed to be a mixture of footings. There was concern in the medical community toward the new Medicare changes. MayYor Pro Tom Riddlesperger commented that he had received notlfication recently on legislation which was proposed requiring doctors to accept Medicare at full payment. Riddlesperger then asked for a briefing on the possibility of a physicians professional building on the hospital site. Mr. Haulser stated that it was very important to the future of Flow couldithenorecruittAndatieaphysicians todthe hospital andethe close proximity of the facilities would allow for prompter services to devalopsplansefororaphetproposedabuilding, otInithenpastt60 days rthere had boon a revitalized interest. A specific propoaal would be presented to the Hospital Board of Directors at thbir next meeting, Mayor Stewart asked if the proposals would present financing by the firm or the City. Chairperson Williams responded that the financing aspect of the building would be presented with the proposals. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that he felt the oonstruotion of this facility was very important to the hospital. Mr. Hausler reported that the administration was making efforts to recruit now physicians to Flow and this would aid in recruitment. A comolotion data for the facility was estimated at approximately 12 to 15 months. Mayor Stewart stated that some d~itors were opposed to the HMO. These organizations would have to have facilities, such as Flow, Weatgata or Lewisville Memorial. Was the objection some physicians voiced to the HMO or to a new hospital, Dr. Don Holt responded that the HMO system was impersonal and lacked the patient/doctor relationship, The cost factor would force independent physicians to form PPOs to compete. Council Member Hop king asked if one of the reasons whyy doctors formed this type of organization might be to have umbrella liability, Dr. Holt responded that he imagined so. Council Member Hopkins inquired about the financial situation of the hospital, Cik Council Minutes Mooing of October 251 1983 Page Three administration respond takitngtsteps hospital p etnalure was in theybwoulda remaii.n so, Thinga were being done to orient the organization in this regard. The administration had looked at elements of cost control, espeolally in light of new Medicare reimbursement policies, Medicare had imposed payment of a predetermined amount of money per diagnosis. If a patient was admitted with a primary diagnosis and then, due to a secondary physical robtem, incurred large medical coats, Medicare would only pa the p Amary diagnosis amount. Mayor Stewart asked if the dollar figure was Lased on the average amount of patient costs for each particular diagnosis Mr. Hausler responded that it was based on a Yale study grouping and this would cause hospitals to readjust their charges. Council Member Hopkins asked if the hoapital administration had expressed their concern to the federal government over this policy. Mr. Hausler responded not really buoause this was the new governmental policy, like it or not. The hospital did not feel that this was in the beat interest of quality patient care. Council Member Hopkins asked the status of collections. Mr. Hausler reported that in July the accounts were approximately hoop iday, was headed bfor abettehr ytim ess with rcollection impr oving. This improvement was due to better or;;anizatton and systematization. Mayor Stewart asked If the hospital experienced delays in receiving payment from the government. ` Mr. Hausler replied that Medicare always paid promptly, Medicaid payment was poor, but by and large the turn around time was adequate. Mr. Havenhill stated that those hospitals which had a higher percentage of Medicaid payments wero hit harder, Mayor Pro Tem "ddlesperger eaquastsd information regarding the mid- wife program. Mr, Hausler reported that it was the intention of the institution to hire mid-wives. The concern of the obstetricians was that Flow was the County hospital and handled the "drop-in' maternity patients, many of which did not pay. Thewa patients usually had received no pre-natal care, If there were complications, these patients would sue the doctor and the hospital, Council Member Hopkins asked if utilizing the mid-wives would not increase the liability. Mr. Hausler responded no. The obstetricians would still handle the difficult oases. The mid-wives would work through the County Health Department to reach these maternity patients. As a group, the obstetricians felt this would help to solve the indigent maternity problem. Council Member Chew asked how the hospital had arrived at the mid- wife program as a solution to the indigent maternity care problem. It appeared that these drop-Ins would need an obstetrician more because of the look of pre-natal care. Council Member Barton than asked what was a mid-wife. Dr, bon Holt responded that the participants in the hospital mid-wife program would be registered nurses with spacial training in obstetrics, City Council Minutes Meeting of October 251 1983 Page Four Council Member Barton asked if an obstetrician would be on call and available. Mr, Haueler repplied that the physicians would not be present but would be on aall. Council Member Chew stated that i seemed the liability for the hospital and the mid-wives would be increased, Mr. Haueler responded that the patients ruaohed through the Health Department would have the advantage of pre-natal care by the mid-wives which they were not now receivingg, The program would not leasen the number of patients but early intervention would 1ea en the liability, Mr. Ifausler also stated that the issue of liability had been thoroughly researched, Mayor Pro Tem Riddlesperger asked if the liability would be lessened if a patient had not received any pre-natal care, Mr. Hoosier responded no, Council Member Stephens asked if the mid-wives would be employed and pair) by the hospital, Mr, Hausler replied yea, The County had agread to pay through Indigent care but were limited on what they could pay, Council Member Stephens stated that the funds would have to be received from dome other source, Mr, Haveohill stated that the hospital was receiving more help from the County but it did not cover the total indigent care cost. The nurse/mid-wife program would be paid by the County until the budgeted funds were exhausted and then the County would reassess. Mr. Bradley Moore stated that the board was hoping to receive income from other areas, such as Aid to Dependent Children end/or Medicare, Mr. Havenhill stated that this indigent maternity issue had been of uppermost concern for 3 years, The board was most oonoarnad with keeping t1e obstetricians at Flow so the hospital o44uld oompets with other mod oat facilities. The County was responsible for indigent care and the board had gone to the City and County with this problem for 3 years and not received any assistance for the obstetricians. Hr, Hbaoirlar realized the hospital had set needed newel magnagemetit year, The the building hadt be eon putDonitha tbnak burnerhandp theibuar6 now feltithat was a mistake. The hospital was trying to reorgauize and become more businesslike without sacrificing good dare for the patients, The board would like to have Mr. Hausler complete in 2 weeks what they should have done 9 months ago, The midwife program was a step in the reorganization and the nurses would be working with the obstetricians in an effort to avoid pre-natal problems. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that the County was responsible for indigent care by state law and then asked why these drop-in maternity cases were not indigant.s. Chairperson Williams responded that they were. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger than asked why the County did not pay all of the mid-wife program. Mr. Hausler responded that some of the charges were physician's fees. Riddlesperger then asked if physician's fees were considered part of indigent care. City Counoil Minutes Meeting of October 25, 1983 Page Pave Council Member Stephens responded that the indigent care portion was only for the hospital expenses and not the physician's fees. Council Member Barton stated that the County was doing more this year than they had in the past. When the County ran out of funds in 4 months, they would need to reassess. Mr. Havenhill stated when the funds were exhausted he believed the Commissioner's Court would look at the mid-wife program again. Council Member Barto stated that the deoiston to implement the mid- wife program was a significant one. Dr. Don Holt stated that the problem was in defining indigent. The state and the County had 2 definitions. Council Member Barton also stared that another problem was in enforcement and he believed that the County Commissioners were working on this issue. Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council had met several months earlier on this indigent care issue and had been given a draft of a formula to determine what and who were olaaaified as indigent care. Chairperson Williams stated that she had recently attended a conference and no one could define indigent oars. Mr. Havenhill stated that all counties handled this issue differently. Mr. HAusler reported that the Hill-Burton criteria was currently being used in Denton County. Council Member Hopkins stated that he thought what the board and administrator had accomplished was very good. Council Member Barton stated that the hospital was taking progress. Mayor Stewart asked If the County was being billed monthly for the indigent care coats. Mr. Hauslar replied yes; this wad begun on October 1. Council Member Barton stated that if the hospital ran out of money, the Council would need to meet with the Commissioners. Counoil Member Stephens stated that the City did not have a direct role in the issue of indigent card. Council Member Barton also stated that the Clty could not enforce or define indigent care. Council Member Hopkins asked about: the statue of the equipment situation. Mr. Hauslar responded that due to the abdenoa of proper management and poor planning the capital needs of the hospital had lagged behind the state of the art. Mayor Stewart asked if purchases of needed equipment would be financed through the fee structure. Mr. Hauslar responded that that was one approach which the hospital would be taking. The board would be continually Assesslng fees and coats. Everyone in Denton had a stake in Flow Hospital and Mr. Hauslar stated that he believed the community needed this hospital. City Council minutes Mestingg of October 25, 1983 page 51x Mayor Pro Tam Riddlesperger stated that the Council was 1001, behind the board. Hr. Havenhill reported that the hospital had been receiving help Prom the Foundation Board. The board had made a move to be more aggressive and public minded. An effort was being made to obtain more memorials and gifts which -would be another source of funds for equipment. Chairperson Williams stated that there was a fund raiser planned by the Foundation Board. Mayor Pro Tam Riddloaperger asked about plans for construction or renovations to the existing hospital building. Mr. Hausler stated that the administration was trying to assess more productive utilization of space. Council Member Hopkins stated that during the attempt to purchase Flow charges were made that the hospital facility was in need of repair and would not meet specific codes. Mr, Bradley Moore responded that the hospitals resident engigage had researched this and felt that the maintenance staff at Flow could correct the problems. Chairperson Williams skated that that issue was resolved before June. Council Member Stephens Asked U the topographical problem of flow would be considered in the plans for the physioians professional building, Some people did not want to or could not walk up the hill to the front entrance of the hospital. Chairperson Williams responded that this was being considered and a ground entrance for the building was possible. Council Member Alford stated that the attitude of the citizens toward the now administration and the hospital board was positive. It wag recognized that Flow was needed and the prospect of the hospital being run as a business was gaining uommunity support. Dr. Holt stated that this was the difference between a profit and a non-profit hospital. Services could be provided because it was right to do so and physicians could treat the patients first and not worry about their bank accounts. The hospital might have to look to the City for capital improvements in the future. Council Member Hopkins stated that this was another reason the Council needed to work with the hospital board as new development program were begun. Mr. Havenhill stated that the board appreciated the Council's concerns and questions. Hr. Havenhill also stated that the City Councils the County Commissioners and the Flow Board of Directors should meet more often. Mayor Stewart stated that he always felt better after meeting with the board and having his questions answered. Mayor Stewart summarized by stating that he was proud of Flow and the job that the Board of Directors had done. The Council then convened into the special called meeting in the Council Chambers. 10 The Council considered adoption of an ordinance relating to the termination of the existing gas fuel contracts under the terms of which the City purchases gas for its generating plants and authorizing the execution of a new gas fuel contract and a gas transfer agreement and declaring an emergency. 1 City Council Minutes Meeting of October 25, 1983 Page Seven Oltyy Manager Hartung reported that this pproposed contract would replaoe the existing contract the four TMPA cities had with Lone Star Gas, Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, stated that Denton had been involved in discussions with Lone Star Gas Company in Convert with the ?Our three TMPA cities for quite a while, The 4ontraots for the four cities were identical with a few exceptions for Bryan and Greenville, Ono of the controats before the Council for a gag exchange agreement and another was a natural gas purchase agreement with Enserc. This agreement would bring the cost per kilowatt hour down from 4,81 to approximately 4,01, The cities were currently paying a 371 transfer cost, Lone Star Gas had agreed ho a 2; increase per year with flexibility in annual volumes, The take or pay" peroentage would be reduced from the present 75% to 40%. If the City did not take the entire 40% during the yeflr, LO% ooul~ be deferred to the following year giving an effective take or pay of 30%. Council Member Hopkins stated that the present gas market had made e difference in the contract provisions. Nelson reported that the "take or pay" wag based on 20x of the price and Cho cities would be allowed to make a one time chapge of 50%. This would be exercised in the event another source o power was used in the future. The transfer agreement was essentially the same as the existing contract. Lone Star Gas would deliver Denton's gas to any other TMPA city, Garland had this same provision'wLth the addition of one other non-TMPA city, This was a five year contract which would be effective immediately, Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked what percentage of electricity in Denton would be generated using this gas, Mr. Nelson responded approximately 40% to 50% of Denton's energy would come from electricity generated with 10% to 20% of this gas, Council Member Hopkins stated that the new contract would provide flexibility which the City did not presently have and commended the staff. Council Member Stephens asked if the other 3 TMPA cities would be meeting at the same time to consider this contract, City Manager Hartung replied that the City of Bryan had approved the contract the previous night with Denton, Greenville, and Oarland considering the contract on the same night, Mayor Stewart asked Mr, Nelson to clarify for the Council why the item was being declared an emergency, Mr, Nelson responded that savings to the utility customers would begin with the execution of the contract. Mayor Stewart asked if the ordinance could become effective immediately without declaring it an emergency. Nelson responded no. The following ordinance was presented! NO. 83-123 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS, "CITY" RELATING TO THE TERMINATION OF THE EXISTING OAS FUEL CONTRACTS UNDER THE TERMS OF WHICH THE CITY PURCHASES CAS FOR ITS OENERATINO PLANTS AN AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A NEW GAS FUEL CONTRACT AND A GAS TRANSFER AGREEMENT AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Ctt Council Minutes Mae ,At of 0atober 254 1983 Page Bight Ho vote pkins motior., Chew second to adopt the ordtoanos, On roll call Barton "dye"A Hopkinj Stephens 'ayye', Alford 'ay Riddleaperger aye Chew aye , and Mayor StaWart "aye', Mo T011, carried unanimously, Drive Pro ectCandato authorize the stafflto advertiseofortbida~dgeway Assistant City Manager Svehla reported the plans to be approved were for Ridgeway Drive between Loop 288 and Teasley, This project was the first step in the process of relieving congestion on Teasley Lane, The staff would be working with the City's financial advisors on certificates of obligation to fund the project and an assessment plan to repay the certificates, Mayor Stewart stated that the project called for Ridgeway Drive to be 25 feet wide and ourbed and guttered on both side with the 80 foot right-of-way vatained to allow for two additional ~anas. Svehla reported that the staff had held numerous discussions with tha Texas Department of Public Transportation and Highways and that everything was in order, Mayor Stewart asked if the street would be in the middle of the 80 foot right-of-way, Svehla replied that it would be offset, Council Member Stephens asked what was the nature of the emergency and stated that he had just received the information. Svehla responded that the landowners in the area were in favor of an assessment program and staff was trying to meet deadlines for advertisingg for bids, 'there had bean a misoommunioation with City Secretary A11en who had placed this item on the November 1 agenda in error Council Member Stephens stated that he had reservations concerning the type of zoning around a thoroughfare of this type and asked if there was any way the Council oould stipulate that the area not be zoned commercial, Svehla replied that the area was zoned already with some planned developments, some commercial, duplex and single family residential zoning in plada, The zoning was accomplished under a 1973 planned development, Some portions in the area had been zoned commercial since the 1960'x, Council Member Stephens asked if an expression from the Council could be made stating their desires to limited the commercial zoning, Barton motion, Stephens second to express the Council's desires for no more oommeroial zoning dad to down zone the area if no activity was experienced in the area within one year, Motion carried unanimously. Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to approve the plans for the Ridgeway Drive Project. Motion carried unanimously. Svehla summarized by stdtin that the bide would probably be received in late November. The assessment would begin in November with completion in Dec,amber or January, The project would begin around the first of x'ebruary. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. MAYOR 10850 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACX-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETINGt November 15, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM fJ Consent Agenda SUBJV:'Bid # 9200 Sectionnlizers SU'IMARYt This bid is for the purchase of two (2) sectional.izers for use In the electric distribution system to supply the Brik-Pak facility with electrical power, ACTION REQUIREUt Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE: OF FUNOSt 1983-84 Budget funds account 610-008-0252-9219-6356, Electric Metering & Substations overhead conductors, REMWENDATIONt We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Priestgr Supply In the amount of $6,158,00, delivery in 12-14 weeks, FOB Denton, 6XNIBITSt Tabulation-sheot, t SUBMITTED BYt Tom D, Shaw, C.E,M, Assistant Purchasing Agent a p 1 J ~4 ~ M eN ~ ~ n P tb CIO O ~ 0 C w N h C ~ Y W M M I N, U O N IJ N i ~ N N i-a M P M fJ p~ W V 13 ry:+ 4i8TJ ~0 M I.li O M VI V ' 1 ry W 5 VJ+c' i0 ~ i g g CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP SVMWY SHEET DAv.1, Or MISE'rjzi November 15, 1983 GOUNCIA, AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent agenda SUBJEC;TI Bid 1) 9201 Annual Typewriter laintonance SUMMARY This service has been bid for the past several years and we have found a substantial savings over the prior Service with about the same service response and quality of servicB, This bid was sent to seven prospective vendors, however, we received only 2 bids (1,B,M, will aot bid their service), I will) however, list their prices :ts published, ACTION RGQUIRin Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNDSt Budget for 1983-84, RECOMMENDATIONt We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder of Friday's Office Supply of Denton at $39,99 each for the estimated total of $3,279,18, EXHIBITS; Tabulatiol sheet, L f SUBMITTED BY t !fl ) john J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent i ~ Mh Oa' b3 rr~~ ~ O H N. W ~ ~ w W N ~ ~ W N H ~ ~ 11~ O ~ G' N ry M N yWW o y py 7 tj I9 O` `NC b O S ~ W N e O +1 VrGiJ` 'c3 r Fypp+,,'D ~0 `C N `C C6 V~ 4A In N ~d V ra V H O N ~ N f~J a a rr ~Cy z CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA RACK-UP 8014%Y SHEET DATE' OF "IEA77N6I November 0, 1983 COUNCIL AGI:NIIA ITEM U COIlsetlL ilganda SUIWECTI Bid p 9204 Traffic Controller SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of traffic signal eon- trolLers and systems supervisors to be installed at Bell-Eagle, Elm-Ft, Worth Drive-Eagle and Carroll Roulvard-Engle, Bids were solicited from three qualified bidders, however, only one bidder could moot the "compatibility with existing equipment" roquiroments. Our attempt to maintain compatibility will hopefully allow us to Improve the traffic flow through the City as well as increase our traffic signal maintenance efficiency, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE: OF FUNDS: 1983-84 budget funds account WO-002-0012-8336, Traffic Enginaering maintenance of traffic signals and traffic control bond funds account 432»002-0012-8336-5116, RECOMMENDATIONf We recommend this bid be awarded to Consolidated Traffic Controls, Inc, in the total amount of $17,920,00, F'OB Denton with delivery in 90 days, EXHIBITS: Tabulation sheet., SUBMITTED BYI 1, ( Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M. Assistant Purchasing Agent ► , I IW ~J ~ I w. IJ N ri W 6 VtN rt~p~ ~q' N ~ ~ ° r Np Vp I ~ ~ M A `G ~ ~C ~ M M N I W YM+i p ~ Cp p ~1 n n N N 0 p ~i ry N N h U p w p r r r p u ~ o c 1 y $ g o",N ° ° N W h g x 1 g ' k CITY C01MCIL ACENDA BACK-UP SMLARY SHEET DACE OF MEETINGi November 15, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM d Consent Agenda 3ull')RC°TI Bid d 9205 Uniforms-Fire Dentartment SUMMARYi This bid is for uniforms for the Fire Department for the next year, We went out for bid with specification to exclude those. uniforms that were flame retardant. This bid was sent to eleven prospective vendors and received four bids, We find that Martin bid uniforms that we have specified in the past and not as specified in this bid, therefore their bid Is an alternate, ACTION RRQUIRED] Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNDS 1983-84 Budget account 100-0060051-8108, RECOMMENDATIOiNi We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meet- ing specifications, item one through six and item eight to J, B. Battle and item seven to Ladd Uniform, The total estimeated amount for the year is $10,618.90, EXHIBITS) Tabulation sheat And memo from Fire Department, SUBMITTED BYE "'~„"~Y'a:L•;::=c;., ohn J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent aD d ~ , O N CO H ~ b ~ q ~ ~ o n ro y 7' H rt N, r~i y n ~ ~r~ yy ~ ~ 6 E7 VIA 0 p' ro ,~y ~ 'O n OpC n ,i N ~R FIFO R• R N C ~ < ~ H R R' n n 0 p ' ~0 lli ern V CM N ~ 10 ~ O N Cj ~O ~ O M 1!, CC rg~ Vr NC. V v ~ O i-. O ~ W C 4 O p p N O N IJ W n oc v, eo w ~ ~ i~ ~ O In ,p n lob N 6 W ~"h W r v, ,a 0 s o0 0 w ro ta rn O O w W tin r r ~ n b M z x , MEMORANDUM DATE: November 9, 1983 T0: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent FROM; Paul Reed, Assistant Chief SUBJECT: Fire Department Uniforms Bid Number 9205 After reviewing Fire Department Uniform Bids we are recom- mending items one (1) through six (6) be awarded to J.B. ; Battle Uniform Company who is low bid meeting specifica- tions. We are recommending item seven (7) be awarded to Ladd Uni- form who is low bid and meeting specifications, We are recommending item eight ~8) be awarded to J,B, Bat- tie Uniform Company, who is low bid and meeting specifica- tions, au Reed Assistant Chief PR/ec CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SFEET MEETING DAM November 15, 1983 SUBJECT; Approval of the preliminary replat of Lots 6 and 7, Block 4, College Addition 8UMMARYi Lots 6 and 7, block 4, of the College Addition are located adjacent and north of West Prairie and west of Welch Street. The property is zoned multi-family (NF-1) and the anticipated land use is multi- family, The original College Addition was primarily platted into lots with 100 feet of frontage, however, many lots have been split and sold by metes and bounds descrip- tion without officially replatting. Most conveyances occurred several years ago but current regulations require an official replat or lot of record map before a build- ing permit may be issued. In instances where multi-family development is proposed on parcels which do not meet the present 60 foot lot width minimum requirement, a variance must be granted by the board of gadjustmont before a building permit may be ranted PlanningaandrZonfng"Commissionprecommendse approval of this preliminary replat with the condition that a variance be granted for the proposed 50 foot lot before a final replat is filed and a building permit is granted for multi-family use. Adequate sewer electrical, drainage, telephone, gas, cable T.V. and street facilities are in place. An existing 2 inch water line will not provide the proposed multi-family development with adequate service, therefore the developers must upgrade the facilities to a 6 inch line in conjunction with final platting and development. Collegge Addition Page 2 ACTION REQUIRM Approval o£ the preliminary replat with or without oondition(s), RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and honing Commission recommends approval of the preliminary replat with the condition that a lot width variance be granted by the board of adjustment before a final replat is filed and a building permit is issued for multi.-family development. ATTACHMENTS,. 1. Reduced preliminary replat, Z. Development Review Committee minutes of November 1, 1983 av son Development Review Planner I O_~ I z _~c_~ rL t rr-I 11 1 ~I r -JUL' ~,<o WELCH STREET )I .0 11 a N c° td, 44' IV a ~8 y N a ~ o L7 ~v. I ~ N r I N u4an v. M S -V 9' 4 V'L.E ftnoun+nt ~I ~ rrAf UCO atitl ~~+W 1 ~ !.lN ra Ma.U ~ ~ lCa O[N fI 33 J + I. ~ f I i ..__.._~.-..+r~....«w...n-.+.~..+..•....r.....a....._~r.......~-._r.....r.~.~n1_rti<wn n~n~Mrr..~~~.Y.wwPn'.~.Yh-...r•-.~~......_ _ , r Minutes Development Review Committee November 1, 1983 DRC Members Presenti Jerry Clark, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison, Tim Fisher, Bob Hageman, Wayne Horsley, Don McLaughlin, Pablo Rubio, Denise Spivey, and Tommy Stone Developer Presents, Anthony 0. Raffino, Joyce Walters 1. Review of Lots 6, 7, Block 4, College Addition A. Engineering Need zoning districts of surrounding property to be shown on plat, B. Water and Sewer 1, Main problem lies with the substandard size existing 2" water line, 2. Page 55, Article 4109 A, Is I of the Subdivision Regulationsi "Properties already served by water and sewer shall not be required to install additional facilities unless a) The current lines are not of adequate capacity to serve the proposed development, in which case the developer will be required to install adequate facilities," 3. Need to build on 8" water line from Welch St, across the frontage property. C. Electric Service available _ overhead from across the street. D. Building Inspection Problem with 50' wide lot in a residential zone - see page 1157, Article 13, B of City of Denton Zoning Ordinance, E. Transportation Engineering No representative from this department was present.