Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-06-1983 CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK- UP.SUWARY SHEET MEETING DATEI December 6, 1981 SU11,1RCTI Approval of the preliminary plat of the East McKinney Stroot Industrial Park SUMMARY; Proposod Lot 1, Block 1, of the Fast McKinnoy Stroot Industrial Park is an 0,421 acre light industrial (1.I) lot Located adjacent and north of Nast McKinney approximately 1156 foot oast of Loop 288, The proposod specific land use is unknown at this time. Water is available from an 8" line on the north side of FM, 426 (East McKinney), Sewer must be extended from an 8" line near Mayhill Road, Adequate electrical, gay and telephone service is available, ACTION REQUIREDI Approval of the preliminary plat, RECOMIENDATION; ' The Planning and Y ping Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat, ALTERNATIVEI Approve the preliminary plat, ATTACHMENTI Reduced preliminary plat bewKx (.C.GI/~(M David Ellison Development Reviev Planner M. E', P G P. R.R. CO. SURVEY 4-9?-7 TN t v'e0 ? 4~3 I 27 A ~ ~ van:: r~x;srrroq NS-~[ i ~rorosao AN 4c'U C-X' Mi~~ UN rzu.N C .n 4XIM f4V i.MtrT A001V. ~ \ I i LOCATION iAAP 4+n.IIl1 1 I WC eoYVra UZU kMN re: -1SO 0,% AOM& NAP bi7C0 1114. SCALE I" X40' 0 G7'08E72 ?.,1983 aVCOMWAVV rtgr r. 91 lagq EAST Mc KINNEV STREET 1NOU57RIAL PARM car r ~cacx r orvrcnrsx 3RUCE W4LLACE' M E R t ?Q 1~ Co. bl/K A •427 SM/77MA7rER MR16470!ON 36i rON CCUnIr% rr.YAvj V HNYp•377 Y ~F JS.+/~ll D'LC'r POINT, r6XAS RECEiVF-O NOV 0 8 tM ( 7~ 259 ' .I 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP S0111% RY SREGT MKHTING DATE December 6, 19£3 SUBJEM Approval of the preliminary plat of the Sheraton North 'T'exas Addition SUMMARYt This 11,167 acre tract encompasses University property, and specifically the proposed site of a seven (7) story Sheraton Hotol/Conference Cantor, The property Is zoned multi-family (MF-2) and the proposed land use conforms with city zoning requirements. Adequate electrical, telephone, cahlo T,V,, drainage and strout facilities are in place or available for extension to the site, no improvements are required to existing drainage and street facilities, 'ro provide adequate water service and related fire protection, a waterline (sine to be determined later based on engineering data) along the IH-35 service road must be looped to an existing 8" line at Underwood and Avenue 1) Streets, Fire hydrants must be provided at the hotel site at 300 font intervals, Sewage service is available from an existing 15" trunk line locatod on Bonnie Brae. The sower main along the IH-35 service road should he sized to handle the flow generated by the proposed facility, Minimum 16 foot utility easements arc required, ACTION REQUIRED Approval of the preliminary plat. RECOMMENDATIONi preliminary plat requirements have been satisfied, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, ALTERNATIVE; Approve preliminary plat, ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat, David Ellison Development Review Planner 1• " i' , II 144-1 1 I ~ if << - ; ; ah f / i i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACKUP SUTIMARY SHEF'f MEKTINC DATI.t December 6, 1983 SUHJEM Approval of the preliminary plat of the Southridgo Village Shopping Center Addition SUMMARYt 'this is the preliminary plat of a 17.9335 acre general retail (OR) tract adjacent and south of the 1-35 service road and adjacent and east of proposed Ridgeway Drive. Specific development plans are not known at this time. Right-of-way for proposed Ridgeway Drive was shown on the approved plat of the Dunning Subdivision, The developers and owners of this tract will reportedly be assessed for participation costs to Ridgeway Drive. Plans for duplicate water and sewer facl.l.ities are being required along both sides of proposed R18geway Drive in the event that state highway designation becomes a reality. No public facilities associated with Ridgeway Drive are in place. Sewer is existing on the northeast corner of Loop 288 and IH-35 East, An existing 14" waterline runs along the south side of the 114-35 south service road. Electrical, telephone and cable T,V, service is available, ACTION REQUIRM Approve the preliminary plat, RECOMMENDATIONt The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat, ALTERNATIM Approve the preliminary plat, ATTACHMENTt Reduced plat Aij 3"r David Ellison Development Review Planner Vv K-I~I ~t "Po c Ill mom ,arl \ tLra.~.l wb.It .r•rov MM1. inIlU Nl't'f4,1 PI Hl its' w NI n 1.0141 IO Mi Acr 0,0.0 rp ~fyler t 1 P OA tt' MINI Nr I:l d)II1'h~+4 66Jr 0, f'C 54 ~eJ3 t2[ yty~ S L,; tcN}f t `tw.Yelbl Q • IMlrl Iwulnwl r ~ ~ t\~(p f ~ 1~~1'11~~iSi rl~w•Sr..` ~<.J n~y ~SLL, `MIA°Y~i *14 10 NI WNII,NI1II I 1111 M9 NVIII OVA ~ o~..Iw renA .l a ~ ~~ii~~~r II MII W,w t\ 1rw YIY4111111 /J J, 1 `._~r,~ j N. uL I1 MI111~P1,d 1 r1. r h MIi MNIII \\tY } Hrrnoe°wv fi ut~P l+r,,.+e ►o. n I Le, ew.,e. Ne1p• ( te4rn eINtNAL tlt,AU re 'a ni111°,I•N~.• 4. i e~L ~ 11 ~ w, i",P' I \ I tame ll Nall IAYIII < I w'~Ift~111~1wM~1.~~.•..~ ff,~ ~J~t, at I 'f I p;S Lb, • I teNtD llNelt IANIL, LNNIU t IAYIL, `._eaN4t .4 A!~.~. Inrvln 4• Al. el(II 11161 e• ea u.l~ eruct e`l4 nnw ur•nn I III 1 111 • 1 1 /7[ 1 t1ll~ ' i1 CITY COUNCIL A04NDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEEP' M4KTINO DATEt December 6$ 1983 SUBJECT Approval of the preliminary plat (lot of record) of The Nest Addition SUMMARY1 This is a 0.821 acre parcel with frontage along both West Hickory and West Mulberry Streets. The property is zoned multi- family and multi-family development is expected. Adequate public facilities are in place to serve the proposed land use. All zoning ordinance area requirements have been satisfied. ACTION REQUIKED; Approval of the preliminary plat (lot of record). RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat (lot of record). ALTERNATIVE; Approve the preliminary plat (lot of record). ATTACHMENT; Reduced preliminary plat (lot of record) oudg David E lison Development Review Planner WEST HICHQRY STREET 60 ROw UH':q! T M Rp .o I. ^.qqi' I rc Wrl+ a ~ e e~ 4uncrq L++fH a'0S✓ :Ortf MOn V/ ~Myron $ $IOU1 11 JJ^8 V Spencer o/ QI 1 I / J M I / f I H gLOT3~7 CI o 6 m O OI 1 O Simi Esc 1 , to i. i I tnuleq r "~N 89g 14 00' H'~06.60' rLuumR 6'' VErp lrnl II~IIrn4 LInrI1r, Slgr N01nn0l1~ ,r-Ll glrnq is" SON IOIY SNIr MULBERRY STREET s0' Row q 7 1 , T, r ~ i aRCJFC" LOCATION E' n m , r i 'v. 0~--0o V~.CC..NI"Y, 11AA SCSLE 192000 C:~, ~-Ael v CITY COUNCIL AGENDA HACK-UP SUP(rjA SIIEET MEETING DATEI December 6, 1983 SUBJECT+ Approval. of the final replat of lot 1, Adkisson Addition SUMMARYi Existing lot 1, Adkisson Addition is a 3,9615 acre lot located at the southwost corner of East McKinney Street and Woodrow Lane, The property is zoned general retail (OR) and the intent of the replat is to crento an additional lot for construction of a private gymnastics center, Proposed lot 1S will have approximately 44 feet of frontage along Woodrow Lane, The final roplat is acceptable and engineering plans for sewer service alonl, East McKinney are acceptable, The developer has agreed to post a bond for plans and improvements to Woodrow Dane if it is acceptable to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission, ACTION REQUIRM Approve the final replat, RECOMMENDATIONI The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ALTERNATIVE: Approve the final replat, ATTACHMENTi Reduced replat, _~/0.~(~1 1:~ David Ellison Development Review Planner 71 oe ~1 ,1 '~-hlC NINr1QV _ ZCnr 4/0i1G1 NUOII a ° rr~l~,yy,.I IOd'kGM' ~ ~t I + LU1 Ix J+ a ~ac~ fcerar ' a Q ~ 1. Q •a o 104 14 vi N E L ~ 0 ' i ¢ L C t 41{ A a Cpr ! t !OJ Ia r 120nt Gfnll Or kfV0il) ti n B., 2 U 0 61, i, Ay•„ ft' I k:y! 1:' yl~ fl 8L000r I i W ; f M Z LOi 14 It t4ll'ICRCI 1 Ptnl th f.0ynly, itf l ~ 2one 4entlor afrou VICIN I S AP 6p N 66, s9 dS„N , MuM„ ~ My~RO r Cl r 9 \ ~ Y CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUNDM SUET MIMING UA'I9 1 Uocembor G, 1983 SUB.114TI Approval of the preliminary plat of the Cushman Addition SUMARYi This is the proposed one :lot subdivision of a one (1) acro tract located adjacent and north of Spencer Road beginning approximately 350 feat west of the intorsecti.on of Loop 288 and Spencer Road, 'flits one acre tract is being platted out of a larger eight (8) acre tract that is zoned commercial (C), The owners of the propor;, have indicated that a single family residence will be constructed presently on the one (1) ac.ro being platted, Tho balance of the property will reportedly be developed as n skating rink, The owners of the tract applied for a permit to locate a temporary construction facility on the eight (8) acres in conjunction with construction of the proposed skating rink. A specific use permit was approved allowing the temporary use of a mobilo home nn this one acre site on Novmeber 15, 1983, An existing water well and septic system will provide temporary utility service until public water and sower lines are extended across the frontage of the tract, The owners are requesting a waiver of the perimeter street paving requirements and public facility im- provements along Spencer Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the waiver not be granted. The Cushman's property has approximately 100 feet of frontage along Spencer Road, Adequate electrical, gas and telephone services are available to serve both the single family residence and the potential skating rink. However, with un- restricted commercial (C) zoning, a myriad of land uses could develop at the site once platting approval is granted. P&'!, bnek--Up Summary Shoot Cushman Addition Page 2 ACTION R1,QUIREDI Approve Cho preliminary plat with or without condition. WXONMYN'ATIONI Tho Planning and 7,oning Commission recommends approval of tiro preliminary plat with the condi- tion that perimeter street paving; requirement be satlnftod during final plat processing, ATTACHMENTi Reducod preliminary plat, 'avid Alison Development Review Planner 1 ' 1I /fir' 1 .rl rl•~~ I 1 1,I. ''1 7 #j) J , 1 i w 1 ~s I 0_q~o r e t +I z 0; $ e 4 o r ONE ~ " ~~C 11/N61 CU Sk4~N, tll RG aCk pNE 7 V W 'y W 2 ~ I 0 r 6 ..'r+lvr 1 V O ' G 6 °S r~. fo ~ 1 'd ' 4'' r L r ~ I 0 04 e 1101 11 e~t~~ 5 I j4i , ~~~"511 '.:.,ds ~.r,* K"r.' ~ Ai L ` or fg' q n I•, q T 'F'A v I JV G slit, J SCaI.G V v+e1►errraP ~ . ' Sc.4c6/:..: CITY COUNCIL AMIMA BACK-UP SUMMARY SkK3b_T MEETING DA'Mi Docombor 6, 1983 sUBiiwr Approval of the proliminary plat of the Oak Ridgo Estates Addition SUMMARYi This property was zonod planned development (PD) for minimum 6,400 square foot lots and single. family detached development, The property is 18,825 acreu in size, Preliminary plans for drainage and utilities are ndoquate. Plans for streets generated considerable discussion during tho zoning change request. Access to the north through this subdivision was discussed, Access to property to the east was briefly discussed. The present plan shows no potential access through this property for land to the east or north, The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council can attach conditions to tho preliminary plat if it " is in favor of alternative plans for streets. All lot sizes meet or exceed the 6,400 square foot mini- mum, The total number of lots is loss than what was approved on the planned development concept plan,. ACTION RF.'QUIRLbr Approve preliminary plat with or without conditions, RE COMMENDATIONi The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval. ALTERNATIVESi 1, Approve with conditions, 2. Approve without conditions, ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat David Ellison Development Review Planner •MIFlY,11MIF IMI MIMIMIFIMIw11 MIM1 MIMIW IFIM171•IIw,IM1y 1MIMIw11.wIFIFIMIFIMIMIFI FI.IIFI FIMIFI~IWIFIwll Al Flw11 w11FI FIFIN1 A1411F1. 1 t~ I ~ 1 ♦I1 Iw,w,al 111„„ r I 1 y,MyG _ Ol9 +lORTµ 110.440414411111 - J4 It i t I T~0 n N ~ 0 I _ 0 ~I 1 M 1 ip+Ytr i r R I ~H91'N1111141w r ~ 1 11 l y I + I t I 1 I ' " wIa•v~ I-- p 11~ 1 1~ p I I ~ IL ,+il 8^II y >r ~ ' ~ r - ate,; - } ~ y w iw.• ' 4~ ly ~ j~ I• i fQ~l ~ Y a l ♦ 11'U' 11.1 141 Y ~ tl 1' 1 ~ r 1 It'll, 111 1 1.11 1 ' i 2 ~ ? i I--• t_.r.. , r j ` I'~ so s ~ ' ! r ~'rl l i ~111'J•V "L'li111a"s.r:.Y.71 _-TI! I I i r IMI~I WIMIr1Y1WIW1 L r rrr~ {cts't!=t=stts=tltrrjll'i(~ ~ 5t ~ ji{i ( sart ye:!!=,q I,t!r1~ I1~{ ~ N: x I~ E fish+.!!!!!t!!iif~l~Il~. ~ ai:tillitttlti~i Ir`li~ QQ 1 n m ty t!t ~ 1 1 1 r j i r I I; t l l l ((I (rl = 3 j a ~ H IS itt i e~ 1 1 i, t 1,,, r 1 {+fi a 3~ m iS ~(i{~jlli!}4{llif~liif~ N i I,i jrrrrrrj rrrraj+jtte llfill'~IJ jy it<< CITY COUNCIL AGORA BACK-UP SUKMARY SNECT MEETING DATEi December b~ 1983 SUBJhC'fl Approval of the preliminary plat of the Royal Meadows Addition SUMARYI This property is zoned single family (SF'-7). All lots meet the 7,000 squain toot minimum area requirement, but approximately 3-4 lots have more than enough lot width, but not enough lot depth, A lot depth variance approved by the Board of Adjustmont is needed. All other preliminary plat requirements have been met. ACTION REQUIRM Approve preliminary plat with condition that no building permits be issued for lots with less than required amount of depth unless variance is granted by Board of Adjustment., RECOMtIhNDATIONI The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval with the condition that no building permits be issued for lots with less than required amount of depth unless variance is grantod by Board of Adjustment, ALTERNATIVESi 1. Approve with condition. 2, Deny ATTAMENTi Reduced plat David Ellison Development Review Planner I~ S 4 ~e F4Q r I` { 4 .I rr•. . n f( r r D q ! f q S ~ ` a«yoe• ~ ~ 5 1 S / 7! ~ .•r 0 7 n fj ' } • 7 1 7 ~ d, " l R 7 ~ ~.I d 9d~„. ~r 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEST MEETING DATE: December 6, 1963 SUBJECTI Approval of the preliminary plat of the Villa e Office Perk and Mini-Storage Addition SUMMARY: This 4.367 acre commercial (C) parcel is located adjacent and east of Fort Worth Drive (246.70 feet of frontage) and adjacent and west of Myrtle Street (406.37 feet of front ge) i As implied in the title, offioe7min-wr,r,ehouse development is proposed. Existing, water and sewer facilities are adequate for, the proposed land use. No perimeter, street improve- ments are required for Fort Worth Drive, however, the owners are responsible for improvements to one-half of Myrtle Street along the entire frogtage of their tract. Drainage improvements are also required. Engineering plans for re uired improve- ments must be submitted during the final platting stage # ACTION REQ01RED: Approval of the preliminary plat. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat. ALTERNATIVE: Approval of the preliminary plat. ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat David Ellison Developmen'. Review Planner Ab t' 6 ~ L m y } v S Alf 47 •~-/U~~ ~ err., E , P . i ram v q'~ w idls C 'i g ~ SE . r I t ` l i rj Ct Il ( > M N 5 ~f r 4 r, uPtJ, rr, .i uelu r~• v „o ..~._.y ..yy ♦_.`I u i474 5 .SaFrr~-.~rjlly 1~ {Hf NMr ,..tj. JFll ~~pp ~ i I iQ. COUNCIL AGENDA K,;V Sl1E GT MEETING DATE: December. 6, 1983 SUBJSCTi Approval of the preliminary plat (lot of record) of the Stoneleigh Addition SUMMARY: This is the former site of a private recreational swimming facility. The I~ropertC is located adjacent and west of lionnie Brae Street aeross from the Nortit Texas State University golf course. A one-story frame single family residence, a pool and three enclosed structures presently facilities earetnoat the w being iutilized s by n8a religious organization. Lot of record approval is required because the church group wishes to obtain a building permit to construct a private gymnasium on the site. The site has 233.65 feet of frontage along Bonnie Brae Street that is subject to per- imeter street paving requirements. All of Bonnie Brae south of IH-35 is unimproved. Article 3, Section 4603, subsection (11) of the development code provides that when land is subdivided or otherwise developed in an area adjacent to existing unimproved streets, the developer shall bear. half the cost of paving (up to 17 feet width) and installation of curb and gutter. The development code further prescribes that for single family development not exceed- ing three (3) acres in size or three (3) lots; or for industrial, commercial or multi-family development not exceed ling three (3) acres in size, the Planning and Zoning Commission can waive the perimeter street paving requirements. Such factors lack-Up summary shoot Stoll eleigh Addition Page 2 as the extent of existing and anticipated development in the urea; the amount of antioipated vehicular, and pedestrian traffic; and the current condition of the unimproved street are to be taken iuro consideration when making a decision. It appears that the proposed development is not ellggAble for a waiver of the pperimeter, street Amprovoments; therefore, tiIa im- provements should be required, or an acceptable performance bond or escrow account for half the costs should be imposed unless the Planning and Zoning Commission approves a variance of this % general requirement under a separate procedure. All other public facilities A are adequate and in place. ACTION REQUIRED: Approve preliminary plat. RE:COMME.NUATIONt The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat at its meeting of November 30, 1983. They could not act on the street Improve- ment question; however., during deliberation five of the six members present indicated that they did not feel that construction of a gymnasium warranted requiring Improve- ments to over 200 feet of Bonnie Brae. The applicants will probably request a variance of the perimeter street paving requirements before action Is taken on the final plat (lot of record). ATTACHMENT; Reduced preliminary plat David Ellison Development Review planner 1 ter"(-r i _ . 3 'I l 1 . 1. ; b6 0,0 d n°~y rug -d 1 1 ~ pp~ ~ 1 ~x D t ~ 111111 ro I ~Ib r •'I'Ila I(.Id " ' 44t-A III', oij IV q.0 i4 I, ;4 r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA HA(t_ -!P SU*tARK SHUT MEETING DAM December 6, 1983 SUBJECT; Approval of the final roplat of lots 6 and 7, Block 4, College Addition SUMMARY; Lots 6 and 7, block 4, of tho College Addition are located adjacent and north of (Jest Prairie and west of Welch Street, The property is zoned multi-family. Tho original College Addition was primarily platted into lots with 100 feet of frontage, howevor, many lots have boon split and sold by motes and bounds description without officially replatting, Most conveyances occurred several years ago but current regulations require an official roplat or :lot of record map before a building permit may be issued, in instances whore multi-family development is pro- poied on parcels which do not meat the present 60 foot lot width minimum requirement, a variance must be granted by the Board of Adjustment before a building permit may be granted according, to a legal opinion, The Board of Adjustment approved a variance for the proposed 50 foot lot on November 14, 1983, Adequate sewer, electrical, drainage, telephone) gas, cable T.V. and street facilities are in place. An existing 2 inch water line will. not provide the proposed multi-family development with adequate service, therefore the developers must upgrade the facilities to a 6 inch line in conjunction with final platting and development. Plans for the water line improvements are acceptable, ACTION REQUIREUt Approval of the final roplat, 4 RECOMMENDATIONS All requirements have been met, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the final roplat. ATTACHMENT; Reduced final roplat. J~ tly{!}1 David Ellison Development Review Planner ~~.,...,Lr..~ lufwWLta~ LOCATION MAP 1 COltL~OE ADDITION ! ~nrili I~it!}t5✓ ~ t j ks ¢ W i-i7 200 Y~ W WEST z PRAIRIE s° s a STREET 3 ~ f tt~,,al~tio O 5 COLLEGE.. ..._A DLTION LQYI_K4. S 1fiVE-y _ R A ScT_._ 4_. 2 ~-.=t:''E__^'.~-"Yp.__. ....~k~-~.li~•.e-'rte. "SGI~ i CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP SUMDIARY SIMET MEETING DATE: December 6, 1983 SUBJECTI Consider quitclaim of a 0,0434 acre strip of right-of-way located along the west side of Teasley Lana and north of Londonderry Lane. (Q-62) SUEfMY: In April, 1983 the Planning; and Zoning, Commission and City Council recommended approval of the quitclaim of excess right-of-way adjacent and west of Teasley Lane, The previous request was sub- mitted by the Attaways (owners of the old Precious Cargo building), At the time the Attaway request was filed, staff contacted Dr. Hied Tillis, the applicant in this request, and asked if he was int.orostod in having the strip adjacent to his dentist office quitclaimed. The right-of- way situation adjacent to the Tillie site is identi- cal to the former Attaway request, Dr. Tillis did not express an interest in the quitclaim procedure in April, 1983 but lie is now seeking approval of his independent request, ACTION REQUIRM Approve or deny request, RECOMMYNDATION., The Development Review Committee did not forsee any future public use of the right-of-way, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 4-1 at its meeting of October 26, 1983, ALTERNATIVES; Approve or deny request, ATTACI M ar s t 1. Map 2, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of October 26, 1983 M J A40_r~__ David Ellison Development: Review Planner s l E: J 5 y~ w 8 t f ~ 4 T ~ I.1 In ~ , f 11H , 1 i lu ~ 1~ 1 1 -~~,--i N. 111 ~ • ~t \J'1 I ~~rIV 'E I 11 I 1 11 ]1 Y.1 I ~J k'kt~ 111 ~ ~l/~ t COI ° - - t E < GC6 LONDONDERRY LAN! i .u I s p t II . It Lf ~ e _ rt a 4 11 U i 1 c I ~ ° ° Ott ~ { p r ° i . r ' cNASewooD LAi r ~ k i ' i P&4 Minutes October 26, 1983 Page 8 Chairman declared the public hearing closed, Mr. Juren commented he does not completely agree with not requiring normal replatting procedures, Mr. LaPorte questioned if there were any forseen problems for the other property owners surrounding this property, :4r. Ellison said done that could be forse,en at this time, Mr. Clark explained the legal opinion as he understood it, but felt it to be somewhat va~ue and stated he is requesting that the city attorney s office present a formal legal opinion with a clearer clarification on this type of situation and asking them if there is anything chat could be put in the regulations to stop this from occurring again, Memo from C. J. Taylor, Jr,, City Attorney, read as ' follows; "I have reviewed the circumstances surrounding the platting of the Reding Addition and it is my opinion that the plat should be approved under our ordinances and regulations. The former lot was divided sometime ago and the city can require the platting of the remaining 60 feet when some activity happens on this portion of the lot." Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approval, seconded by Ms. Cole, unanimously carried 5-0. IV. Considerations 4 A. (Consider quitclaim of a strip of excess right-of-way located south of Londonderry Lane and west of Teasley Lane. (Q-62) Mr. Ellison stated the Development Review Committee recommended approval of the quitclaim. Ms. Cole made a motion to approve the quitclaim (Q-62), seconded b Mr. Escue. Vote called Aye - 4, Nay - i (Claiborne . Motion carried. L J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SU94ARY SKEET MEETING DAM Docombor 6, 1983 ;iUBJECTt Consider quitclaim of a portion of right-of-way of Ruth Street located between Cook Street and industrial Street (Q-63) SUMAM The owners of property located adjacent and north and south of this portion of Ruth Street have re- quested that existing right-of.-way be quitclaimed. They wish to acquire title to the property because it splits t'O-Ir property and they desire to main- tain a conti)-ious piece of property. This section of Ruth Street was never built, The Engineering Department sees no need in retaining this property for future transportation purposes, No utility lines are present in the street but this right-of-way could be used in the future to loop in a 6" dead end water main on the east side of industrial Street to a 6" water main on the south side of Ruth Street, A 16' utility easement could be granted to serve this purpose if the property is quitclaimed. ACTION REQUIREDI Approve, deny, or table quitclaim request, RECOMMENDATIONi The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends F approval of the quitclaim request with the con- dition that a 16' utility easement be retained on the property, ALTERNATIVESi Approve, deny, or table quitclaim request, ATTACHMENTSi 1. Nap 2. Letter from Belcher Trucking Company 3, Development Review Committee minutes of October 25, 1983. 4, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of November 9, 1983 OaJU4~m David Ellison Development Review Planner ` e e 9 j ``t f~/ tl i I~ 1 A ' SON r A ~ ff r ^ i .1 ~ WYQ t ~ 1 ~ e v 1 b _I A A ' ~ 9 7 r B 3 r 40 r ~ ~ ~e✓1 1 ~ .r~ r e 9 to Ir o r e ~ ro n ,t 1 1! U !0 I z I z 3 s ! e I r 3 A ~ e ~ . r~tr rx r : r 2 3 A ! 6 f 3 e 9 !0 II !t ' IS 14 104 ~ + a v :^?f r r• . 1 I ' o¢~~q ROSERTSON AODI rlON s j f l~ 3 \ 9c 192 7 VOL. 11 ti~ P 19 r . I r i l ,I I E. W. BELCHER TRUCKING, INC. ROUTE 1, BOX 757•411 - PHONE 817.5687492 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 September 13, 1983 CITY OF DENTON TEXAS Planning & Zoning pept. Denton, Texas 76201 Oentlemen- outs into ourrpropertyoon the DallasiDrive,Rwehwoulldelike which obtain it for tthe following reasonsf 1. It outs into our land and altho it dead ends on our land, it still separates a large portion of it. 26 Ruth Street is unpaved and ungraded and beoauso of its position we feel it is of no use to the city as a thoroughfare. 3. There is not sufficient land to be of use to anyone else. Therefore we would appreciate your consideration in cur obtaining it. Very truly yours E. W, BELCHER TRUCXT1400 INC. E. W. Belcher, Pres. EWB1wm „ y t Minutes Development Review Committee October 25, 1983 ARC Members Present: ,terry Clark, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison, Jack Centry, Koorosh 01yai, Denise Spivey, Tommy Stone, Tim Fisher, Harlan Jefferson, Pablo Rubio an,i Ernie Tullos Developer Presents Jim Aloes VII, Review of Quitclaim Request of por.ion of Ruth Street ' A. Engineering 1, Engineering department has no use for this property for drainage or streets, 2. If property is quitclaimed, developer or buyer shall pay for all needed surveying and quitclaim costs, 3. Recommend approval of this q,iitclaim, B. Water and Sewer a 1. This right-of-way could be used in the future to loop in a 6" dead end water main on Industrial Street, 2, W that ill recommend quitclaim if t, 16' utility easement is granted east sided connect 611 south Tim sie of at 566-o8453 water for rfurther information, C. Electric Quitclaim is acceptable; D. Building Inspection ' Quitclaim is acceptable, E. Transportation Engineering Quitclaim is acceptable, , F. Fire wouldQuitclaim is a 16 foot side ofi Ruth tos 6" water on granted side of Industrial, Minutes Development Review Committee Quitclaim - Ruth Street Octdber 25, 1983 Page 2 G, Parks and Recreation No representative from this department was present, H. Lone Star Gas Quitclaim is acceptable, 1, C,T.E, No representative from this department was present,' 0, Cox Cable No representative from this department was present, K. Planning and Community Development 1, Recommend approval of quitclaim, Developer must provide field notes of portion of street to be quitclaimed, A 16 foot utility easement must be established on quitclaim, 2. Quitclaim must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, P&Z Minutes. November. 9, 1983 Page 11 B. Approval of the final plat (lot of record) of the Westgate Park Addition. (Moved from the Consent Agenda) Mr, Ellison explained this is a SF-16 lot, the proposal is to build a single family residence, The petitioner is requesting a waiver of the perimeter paving require- ment. Development Review Committee recommends approval with the waiver of the perimeter paving, Mr. LaForte commented he favors the waiver, Mr. LaForte made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat (lot of record) of Westgate Park Addition with the recommendation to grant a waiver of the peri- meter street paving. Ms. Cole seconded the motion, unanimously carried 6-0. Mr. Juren left his seat for the next item of discussion. C. pproval of site plan for office planned development ( D) at northeast corner of West Hickory and Denton Streets. (Z-1588) Ms. Spivey stated that on September 12, 1983 the Historic Landmark Commission approved specific site plans for the law office by a vote of 5-0. She ex- .plained the project conforms to the planned develop- ment with regard to the parking spaces, the tree to be preserved and the elevation. Staff recommends approval. Mr. Sidor made a motion to approve the site plan, sec~nded by Mr. Escue, unanimously carried 5-0. Mr. Juren returned to his seat. D, `Consider quitclaim of a portion of right-of-way of Ruth Street located between Cook Street and Industrial Street. (Q-63) Mr. Ellison stated this right-of-way is not being (UNAPPROVED) utilized and the petitioner owns property on each side of this right-of-way. Development Review Committee recommends approval with the condition that a 16 foot utility easement be retained, Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approval with the condition that a 16 foot utility easement be retain- ed, seconded by Mr. Escue, unanimously carried 6-0. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: December, 6, 1983 SUBJECT; Approval of the final replat of lots 19 and 20, F. M. Darnall Addition SUMMARY; Proposed lot 20H of the above referenced subdivision will total 0.578 acres in size, if approved, The intent of the replat is to remove an existing lot line between lots 19 and 20 for resubdAvision into one lot. The property is zoned multi-family (MF-2) and multi-family development is anticipated. The pr~uperty is located at the southeast corner, of Avenue B and Eagle Drive. Adequate streets utilities, drainage and other public facilities are available to the site. Although it is an improved street, Eagle Drive is designated as a secondary major arterial. The Development Guide and subdivision regulations require 60 - 80 feet of right-o£-way for, secondary major arterials. Staff is recommending that the maximum right-of-way be acquired when possible in cases where subdividing and re-subdividing is occurring for future planning and possibla improvements. No improvements are planned for Eagle Drive in the immediate future. Ten (10) feet of, right-of-way is being requested off Eaglo in conjunction with this request. Devel- opment Review Committee minutes sent is the owners erroneously advised that ae, additional twenty (20) feet of right-of-way is being requested for Eagle and that a • total of 100 feet of right-of-way is needed. Half of the total right-of-way needed is all that can be required on recordable subdivisions only. Right- of-way dedication cannot be required on lot of record plats. This is a request t City Council Back-up November 30, 1983 F. M. Darnall Addition Page 2 SUMMARY (Continued)i for re-subdivision; it is not a lot of record procedure. The petitioners ap- peared at the Planning and Zoning Com- mission with legal caunsel (Mr. John Narsutis) and it is their preference and request that no right-of-way dedication be required. ACTION REQUIRE;U; Approval of the final replat and action on right-of-way dedication issue. RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mends approval of final replat. The Planning and Zoning Commission did not act on the right-of-way question because staff did not provide them necessary information at the November 30, 1983 meeting. ALTERNATIVE: Approval of the final replat. I ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat av son Development Review Planner 'iQRTn 'e(.,; irATE JIAVERS,rY 1 C, n41014AL,M $4117M' A- 006 _-___AGLEo ROW EASY 14.70' $~P PIP I X41, L PAN.1T 0r 'S LOT 2O R I~ 00 0,078 Ac, y O 5R a H _OT 14 p0Okikoo . a' P n p aA a60 0 si WEST 164.70 LJT IS LOT 13 4-A OEVELOKRI IF l,r-.. GOLDEN 140 SYIOER CO. 9 (ryL~} ~.I 2W0 avaenan Yrall' Oenlon, fua>< Am "fill T~v yrs. r3 f LOQATION , MAP I 2000 11 j FINAL PLAT F. M. DARNALL ADDITION LOT 9O R BEING A REPLAY Of LOPS 19 9 20 ✓ ~ F. M. OA RN ALL ADON., Vol. 324 P4 460, DR.OA.T. CITY 6 COUNTY of DENTON. YEXAS SCALE 1", 40' NOVEMBER 17, 1993 18JPNIC SC4 LL IN PEEr 40 so CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUD11lARY_ g1JE :T MEETING DA'I'S i December 6, 1983 SUBJEM This is a public hearing concerning the proposed annexation of approximately 175 acres of land beginning at the existing city limit on the north side of Highway 380 east, (Z.•1621) SUMMARYI The proposed annexation is 500 feet wide and goes north for 10,560 feet and then turns west for approximately one mile, All of the property in- volved in the proposed annexation belongs to the Corp of Engineors. Annexation will extend the city's extra territorial jurisdiction (F.T.1) two (2) miles to the north of the northern extremity of the annexation which will en- able subdivision review by the City of Denton in this area. Annexation of this land will enable additional future annexations in the direction of our future water resource and can servo to more clearly define the ul- timate northeastern boundary of the City of Denton. ACTION REQUIRED; Hold a public hearing. ALTERNATIVES! 1, hold a public hearing. 2, Discontinue annexation process. 3, Reduce the size of the proposed annexation. RECOMMENDATIONi The Planning and Community Development Department staff recommends approval, The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation at their meeting of December 14, 1983. EXHIBITSi 1. Map 2. Service Plan 3. Property owner list 4, Reply form totals Charles S. Watkins Senior Planner r ~:rwa ~•r „ rlLr S, xK'hWY.•.'1ri.vluMNiakM4ti A Alt , . v.„ , N• n r1/! ,F•i pia • 1 .v 1 . _ N . ry/ \ 4 TI Nsl r( IL(K nM~ L :r~~Y N.W ~'y~,~j 11.11. j , aM Y N •Sr i m t w r I•L+.r~N ~ r'Mdf•1Nhh• r ~ b 0 1 115rubbt Rd to • : IV ' • 1 0 , AIOpY I + 4 h SnYDc' c Rd, i l d i•0 0i •ii' • x >jrr_rr_:r.:-ai rr-~->ar~-~~~-..,~,.1~ic:rc~~YYC Y , y~ F; 1 V{r .$reen 'volley M ' C r'~, r # r „ 4 ••f,~'~~`, X44 1 o xr-• - ° ' ' r N ~wbji,chgn''Rd u<^ . X I p all ~rN ro • WOrf` Fhu Rdr c 70 a' Qa,•e~'y p6'.'•~ E I m.80ttOm CirCIA.W '4 D '_`~/V`E• • • ' • / RoCk ~ ~V `_r Y.y FYI ' 1 ~ rl ~ ,1 / r b / ' • 'AIRFIELD phood6 ~Rd 1 ,~'•~0 1 t ~l j.~"-=lF-'`.Yfff(((Y• •/Ciilbrl)thz \ 317y 62 It t H2d ie teFie1d ' Rd } / .I Y 1 • Y \ r~ + ArYln Ni11 •R Y 4 , ' n'? \ Y p ' is ~ ~ I . ~ ~ , ~ • KI now Dr. rlfl n . rl _ IC ~ _ / p <24 Y •ti I Tin 91 z Q~ ~ i1 Cte - 2, , roster d. I e26 Y r ,PJd ./o 1 PLAN OF SERVICE FOR A"3VEYED AREA CITY OF DENTON TEXAS be adoptodKI'REAS) Art.iole 070a as amended requires that a plan of service annexing ng anby the governing body of a city prior to passage of an o area; and rdinanoe area whichWHEREAS the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an h is bound" as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; ' amended, TSection.1,Annursuant to the iProvisions of Article 970a as as Code annexation area the following plan of service: adopted for the proposed I, Basic Service Plan A, Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (Z) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic oontrol devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present ment of the fire fighting force,~ewill nbe providedp- on the effective date of annexation, C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and 'thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13,06 of appondixx A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, E, Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation, 1 ' 1 Service Ilan ~ Annexed Areas Page two F, Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,) will begin on the effective date of annexation, (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city, G, Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, I, Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec- tive date of annexation, The same standards and policies now used to the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L, MtsceIIan eous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation, II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as; (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. .29 0a ° S ;r PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1621 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received f CjrYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 - Office o(tho city M1lc3nagor November. 18, 1983 The Texas Economic Development Commission P. 0, Box 12728 Austin, Tx 78711 Gentlemen: This letter, constitutes notice to you, pursuant to Rule .002 (b) (9) (A) (1) of the Texas Economic Development Commission Rules for Issuing Industrial Revenue Bonds (the "Rules'), that the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas intends to hold a public hearing under the Development Corporation Act of 1979, V.A.C.S., as amended and the Rules for the purpose of establishing an Eligible Blighted Area. The area pro~osed by the City to be designated as an Eligible Blighted Area is as shown on Exhibit A hereto. The public hearing with respect thereto is scheduled for 7:00 p.m., on Tuesday, December 6, 1983, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at 215 East McKinney in the City of Denton, Texas. Very truly yours, Charlotte Allen , City Secretary City of Denton, Texas cc w/enclosures: H. Edward Toles Johnson and Swanson 4700 Interfirst Two Dallas, Texas 75270 Mary Macaulay First Southwest Company Mercantile Bank Building Dallas, Texas 75201 11070 R EXHIBIT A The area proposed by the City of Denton to be designated as an Eligible blighted Area is that city block which is: bounded on the west side by Kendolph Street bounded on the south side by Wilshire Street bounded on the east side by Avenue C bounded on the north side by Eagle Drive 1107C/2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given to all interested members of the public that the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, intends to hold a public hearing at 7100 p.m. on December 6, 1983, in the Council Chambers, 215 East McKinney, in the City of Denton, Texas, on the proposed establishment, pursuant to the Development Corporation Act of 1979) V.A,C.S., as amended, and the Texas Economic Development Commission Rules for Issuing Industrial Revenue Bonds promulgated thereunder, of an Eligible Blighted Area being described as followst bounded on the west side byy Kendolph Street bounded on the south side by Wilshire Street bounded on the east side byy Avenue C bounded on the north side by Eagle Drive All interested persons are invited to attend and express any comments they have regarding the proposed establishment of the Eligible Blighted Area. 1109C JOHNSON & SWANSON A'ORNEVS AND COUNFELORS 4 FAq tt;E RSHIP "IC WD'N0 PROFESSIONAL CORPOq At10 N5 n<;;Er ,I, F7 Rr,er 4700 1NTERFIRST TWO 1010 PACIFIC AVENUE +c,~~NOCwc0DlOwru (DALLA5, TEXAS 76270 $WTE 1200 1LX4S 16 t01 214 6632000 DALLAS, TEXAS 16201 Eli n'4.452P TEL@X', 73 0180 214651aw0 TSLECOPV• 214 553.2O" 18364 NOEL ROAD 'NRITER'E DIRECT DIAL NL'hIBER 2iNONE OALLERIA TO14ER (214) 653-2041 DALLAS, TEXAS 16?40 214 E61.5000 November 30, 1983 VIA MESSENGER Ms. Charlotte Allen City Secretary 215 East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Re; Establishment of an Eligible Blighted Area Dear Charlotte: *1 am enclosing seven copies of a Resolution of the City Council designating an Eligible Blighted Area for consideration by the City Council at its December 6th meeting, As you know, there will be a public hearing with respect to this matter prior to consideration of the resolution. The purpose of designating an Eligible Blighted Area is to pormit'the financing with industrial revenue bonds of projects for 1}commercial11 uses within the geographical area designated as an Eligible Blighted Area, In Texas, "industrial" or "manufacturing" projects can be financed with industrial revenue bonds without an area being designated as an Eligible Blighted Area, but, as noted above, "commercial" projects can be so financed only in an Eligible Blighted Area. An Eligible Blighted Area is an area with respect to which a city council finds that there is present a substantial number of substandard, slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures, or suffers from a high relative rate of unemployment and which substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of'the city or constitutes an economic or social liability and a menace to the public health, safety or welfare of the city in its present condition and use. Ms, Charlotte Allen November 30, 1983 Page Two One of the primary reasons that the establishment of the Eligible Blighted Area is being considered is a result of the request of representatives of Allcom, inc. to do so since this company is considering the purchase and renovation of a facility within such area and the establishment of business operations there that would employ a large number of people, it appears that the project would he a "commercial" project, and thus could be financed with industrial revenue bonds if the Eligible Blighted Area is established. The timing of this matter is important since the Texas Economic Development commission (which is responsible for prom- ulgating rules relating to the establishment of 8ligible Blighted Areas) is in the process of considering new :rules which, if put into effect, may make it more difficult for a city to establish an Eligible Blighted Area, i think it is highly desirable that the city manager or 4is staff be in the position of making a report or presenting materials which show that one or more of the conditions described above exist in the proposed Eligible Blighted Area, .1 hope that this in;ormation will be helpful to you and the members of the City Council.4 if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, cSincerely, H. Edward Toles HET/ew clrr of,DEWON, rrXAS muh)CIPAL BU1LD)NG PEN TON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (8)7} 56618200 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M T0: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM, Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager DATE: November 23, 1983 SUBJECT: Consider an ordinance establishing the need and necessity for Ridgeway Drive and for establishing a public hearing for assessed property owners. This ordinance is the first step in establishing the assessment proceedings for Ridgeway Drive. These assessments will ultimately repay all of the obligations associated with the issuance of Certificates of Obligation which will be issued to fund the construction of Ridgeway Drivel We estimate the assessment to each individual property owner as being approximately $50 - $60 per frontage foot. This figure will be pinpointed after the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation is complete and all associated costs have been computed. If you or the Council have any further questions, I will be at the mee to try and answer them. Rick Sve a Assistant City Manager lslsrs N0. AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING THE PAVING AND IMPROVEMENTS OF PORTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS IN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI ORDERING 110 BE PREPARED AN ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS, AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND 3PECIFICATIONSI DIRECTING THE U.*ViNO OF NO 1'ICE1 DETERMINING THE COST rn°t a A HMETHOD FORIITHES REIMBURSEMENT By THE CCITY OOF ODENTON OF S C031'AAGAINSTHTHE PROPERTYTABUTT ASSESSMENT IMOF A PROVEMENTS PORTION AND SUCH THE FIXING OF A LIEN TO SECURE PAYMENT FOR SUCH ASSESSMENTI DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO FILE NOTICE OF THE ASSES$MENTI AND SPECIFYINU AC'T'ION UNDER ARTICLE 1105 REV SE STATUTES AND DECLARING AN WE I D CIVIL CTIVE DA1'B, TIRE COUNCIL OF 11118 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY OROAINSI SECTION Is certain epportions ofistreets hereinafterelisted and irovement of enumerated those In Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, SECTION IT. Such streets shall be improved by cutting or filing them to bring them to grade, by widening and straightaning, by constructing, reconatruoting, repairing and realigning curbs, by constructing appurtenances and lholdentals to such improvements, Includingg all drains and culverts, all as shall be recommended Engineerlshallgpireparenanaestimate oft the cost oof Osuch improve- mart and shall draw and prepare all necessary plans and specifications, SECTION III, The City Secretary is hereby directed to cause to be prepared a notion of the enactment of this ordinance and file said notice with the County Clerk of Denton County, Texas, among the mortgage or deed of trust records of said county. SECT rV The cost of such improvements shall be paid for by the City of Denton. The City of Denton shall reimburse itself for not more than ninety percent (909) of the cost of the improvements the thr11 11 s and entrue g ownersth thereof ctine abutting Property y tand he provisions of Article 1105b, Revised Civil Statutas of the State of Texas. The amount of such assessments shall constitute a first and prior lien upon all such property and personal liability on the real and true owners thereof, whether correotly named or not. The property abutting on the street shall be ansesaed on a per front foot basis, the estimated coat par front foot and the estimated total coat of the total paving being as set forth in Exhibit A. PAGE 1 No assessment shall no made until after the nOlU0 and hearing provided by aw, and no assessment shall exceed the special benefits in enhance value to the property and the owners thereof by reason of such improvements, SECTION V. Such assessment shall be payable either byl with to tno paving engineer, assessment esarow)forathe~City of Denton equal Department of public works to be paid upon completion and acceptance of the paving by the City of Denton) or, Denton, Ulncaninamounno a or tnoteh, payable to the Cityy of asaessed against the abuttin Psainq aeeeament tb be in equal monthly installments nortpto texceeddthrees(3) yearsayable Intorest installments, on the e be tatoa rates of pa tell lepercentua(10%) per annum, Any balance on any note that is due and owing and unpaid shall carry a straight interest rate of ten percent (108) until paid, In the event that the total amount of paving assessment against any one lot is less than Two Hundred Dollars ($200,00), two notes shall be executed by the owner of the property, payable to the City of Denton, as follows) The first note equalling fifty percent {508) of the paving assessment to be assessed against his/her property is to be paid unpon completion and acceptance of the paving by the City of Denton, The second note equalling the remaining fifty percent (506) of the paving assessment to be assessed against the property shall be payablo in twelve (12) equal monthly Installments payable on the same date of each month thereafter, and shall bear interest at ten peroent (106) per annum. Any such installment may be paid at any time before maturity by the payment of the principal and accrued interest thereon. Past due principal and interest shall bear interest at the same rate from maturity until paid, If default is made in the pa me ht of any such installment or interest, the entire unpaid balance of the assessment plus interent shall, without notice to the owners, and at the option of the holder of the Certificate of Special Assessment, if any, immediately become due and payable together with expenses of collection and reasonable attorney 'a fees, if incurred. In the event of such default, collection shall be enforced by suit In any court having jurisdiction. Upon the completion of the improvement and the acceptance thereof by the City of Denton, the assessment made against all abutting property owners who have not made arrangements for the payment of the assessment as above set forth, shall be immediately due and payable, PAGE 2 SECTION VI, gg undernthea provisions suoh ns ofptheeFortieth Counotl to State lof Texas, known as Chapter 106 of the Ants of said sseefon, together with amendments thereto also known as ACtiole 110gb of Vachon's Civil Statutes, adopted by the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas, SECTION VII, In thepCityoCouhearng is noil Chambersi, eMunicipal Building, Denton, armexas. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 6th Gay of December, 1983, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE AL UN, CITY-MU CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY, PAGE 3 M WISIT "A° Estimated Front Foot Cost to Property Ownerei $50.360 Front Foot Estimated Total Cost to Abutting Property Ownerei $550,000,00 AIDGEWAY DRIVM EAST SIDE Front Footage Owne s i Address 755 24' Southridge Limited 7007 Preston Road Partnership Dallas, Texas 75205 (David Dunning) 22J$.461 Denton Residential, N.Y. 2001 Bryan Tower suite 3000 (Ken Shulman) Dallas, Texas 75 O1 1884.60' Dimension Development Co, 1910 Paottlo Avenues Suite 1700 Dallas, Texas 75201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WEST SIDE Front Footage Ownership Address 1535,64' Dimension Development Co. 1910 PaoiPio Avenue, Suite 1700 Dallas Texas 75201 2241,41 Denton Residential, N,V. 2001 Bryan Tower, suite 3000 (Ken Shulman) Dallas, Texan 75201 300' Tom Fouts 6 Frank Croukett 700 Dallas Drive Denton, Texas 76201 39I,50' Colson Real Estate 3010 Santa Mootoa (Bill Colville) Denton, Texas 76201 122,29' Southridge Limited 7007 Preston Road partnership Dallas, Texas 75205 (David bunning) PAGE SOLO CITY of DENrON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE W7)566-840 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M T0; G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager DATE November 23, 1983 SUBJECT; Consider an ordinance for raising the electric fees on apartment complexes. In the David M. Griffith study, a recommendation was made' to increase electrical fees to cover the cost of service for the City. After several meetings to review this, the Electrical Board recommended a different method of charging fees on apartment buildings be established by ordinance to raise the amounts of revenue needed, In this ordinance, each apartment building would be issued one electrical permit and then each individual "living unit" (i.e., one-bedroom, two-bedroom, efficiency) would be assessed fees just as if it were a stand-alone, single dwelling, Our fee structure has always been based on the theory that larger the quantity of circuits, service, outlets, etc., the cheaper they became. Under this new way of assessing the, fee, these "discounts" would not be realized in larger apartment buildings, rather, each living unit would be treated as a single, stand-alone unit, and therefore more fees would be generated. If building activities continue to occur as they have in the past year, then the needed amount of money to cover the cost of service will be realized. If you or the Council have any fur.thar questions, I will be happy t y and answer them. c veh la Assistant City Manager 1515M 1 NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, RELATING TO THE ELECTRICAL, CODE, PROVIDING FOR INCHEASED FEES FOR ELECTRICAL PERMITS, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REREHY ORDAINSi PART I, That Chapter 9, Article IV, Section 9.47, "Separate Permits°, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended to read as fcllowsl "Separate Permits, A separate permit shall be required for each separate building or store space, To determine the permit fee for an apartment building each apartment unit shall be calculated separately. The boat of electric service to an apartment building shall be determined by the number of service crops or aervica laterals to the building." PART II. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1983, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FONMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS By l MEMORANDUM t TO; G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM; Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager DATE; November 23, 1983 ' SUBJECT: Consider an ordinance for the issuance of Certificates of Obligation for construction of Ridgeway Drive. First Southwest has advised us that this would be the easiest way to provide the financing for the improvements of Ridgeway Drive, The repayment of these Certificates of Obligation would be accomplished by assessing all of the owners with frontage on Ridgeway Drive. If you or Lb e Council have any further questions, First Sou thw. nd I will//be at the meeting to discuss them with'you. Rick Sveh a Assistant City Manager 1515M f 1 CPDIEUACE rV)~{C ZThb CERTIFICATE FCR rssuANCE O~CERTIFICATEB OF onlzw,TZN THE STATE OF TEw CC(M OF OEMY'N , CITY of DLI= we' the undersigned officers of said City, hereby certify As follows, I, The City Council of said City convened in at 010 fticiPal Building (CCiity Nall) DAY OF Fthe JANUARY, roll was called of t}se duly constituted officers and manbers of said City Council, to-wit, Richard 0, Stawart, F4ayor Charlotte Allen, city secretary ;lark R, Chow Dr, A,. Pay Stephens Jack Barton Jim Riddlesperger, Mayor Pro Tem Charles Hopkins Jce Q. Alford and all of said persons wore present, oxcept the following absentees, $ us followingwrass transacted a osa erautvf pon, along other us mess' the Meeting, a written ORDINANCE AVIHORIZ.IM THE ISSUAECE OF CER7IFICA.W OF OBLIGATION was duly introduced for the consideration of said City Council and duly read, It was then duly moved and seconded that said Ordinance be with parsedi of After due discussion, prevailed andicarriedonby the f q ollow nq vptal the AYES, All members of said City Council shown present voted "Aye", except 4 NOES, , APSM1TTGNS! f 2, That a true' full' and correct copy of the aforesaid Ordinance passed and attached t to the et desced the and follows this Cettif cateesj tAhatt said Ordcl ahasp~n duly recorded in said City Council's minutes of said Meeting, that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full, and correct excerpt from said City Council's minutes of said Meeting pertaining to the passage of said Ordinance, that the persons named In the above and foregoing paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified, and noting officers and marbers of said City Council as indicated therein, that each of the officers and members of said City Council was duly and sufficiently notified offlalally and personally in advance, of the time, place, and purpose of the aforesaid Meeting, and that said Ordinance would be introduced and considered for passage at said Meetingt and that said Meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the tams, place,; and purpose of said ,sating was given, all as required by 'lemon's Ann, Civ, St, Article 6252-17, 1, That the Mayor of said City has approved, and hereby approves, the aforesaid Ordinancel that the Mayor and the City Secretary of said City have duly signed said Ordinance) and that the Mayor and the City l retrifirate shall constitute the are that their signing of this copy of said Ordinance for all signing of the attached and Eo11aaLng purposes, SIGNED AND SEALED the day of January, 1904, CRY secretary Mayor (SEAL) _ _ - - - - • - - - Wm, the undaesigned, being respeotively the City Attorney and the Bond Attorneys ~f the City of Denton, Texat:, horeby certify that we prepared and approved as to legality the attached and following ordinance prior to its passage as aforesaid. ty Attorney attorneys ORDINANCE N0, ORDINANC AUTHORIZING ~{E ISSUANCE OF E 2 Y'E3 OFD LIGATION T114 STATE OF TEXAS i COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF OENTON WHEREAS, Vernon'e Article 2368a,1 permits the City to issue and sell for cash the Certificates of Obligation hereinafter authorized} and WHEREAS, tho City has duly oaused notice of its Intention to issue the Certificates of Obligation hereinafter authorized to be published at the times and in the manner required by Vernon's Article 2368a,1, and no petition has been filed protesting the issuance thereof, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAIM Section 1, AMOUNT AND PURPOSE OF CERTIFXCATESi That the said City's Certificates of Obligation (hereinafter sometimes called "Certificates") are hereby authorized to he issued in the aggregate principal amount of s FUR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING ALL OR A PORTION OF T E ITY'S CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TO BE INCURRED FOR STREET ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, ATTORNEYS, AND FINANCIAL SADVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, Section 2, That said Certificates shall be designated as thei CITY OF DENTON CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1984, Section 3, DATE, DENOMINATIONS, NUMBERS, AND MATURITIES OF CERTIFICATES, Initially there shall be issued, sold, and delivered hereunder fully registered certificates, without interest coupons, dated 1984, in the respective denominations and princip-a -amounts mounts hereinafter stated, numbered consecutively from R-1 upward, payable to the respective initial registered owners thereof (as designated in Section 13 hereof), or to this registered eastgnea or assignees of said certificates or any portion or portions thereof (in each case, the "registered ownarH), and said certificates shall mature and be payable serially on in each of the years and in the pri.noipal amounts, respectively, as set forth in the following sohedulei YEARS AMOUNTS YEARS OUNTS The term "Certificates" as used in this Ordinance shall mean and include collectively the certificates initially issued and delivered pursuant to this Ordinance and all substitute certificates exchanged therefor, as well as all other substitute certificates and replacement certificates issued pursuant hsreto, and the term "Certificate" shall mean any of the Certificates, Section 4, INTEREST, The Certificates scheduled to mature during the years, respectively, set forth below shall bear interest from the dates specified in the FORM OF CERTIFICATE set forth in this Ordinance to their respective dates of maturity or redemption prior to maturity at the following rates per annum, Maturit'y' _i Maturity Maturity _ i Maturity Maturity b Maturity Maturity =i Maturity i Maturity _ ; Maturity ~9 Maturity ~ Said interest shall be payable in the manner provided and on thn dates stated in the FORM OF CERTIFICATE set forth in this Ordinance, Section 5, CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CERTIFICATES, Registration, Transfer. Conversion and Exchan e~ Authentica- c oa, a1 Tis City 4 Rd I-keop or cause to a opt at the ppTnoipaI-corporate trust office of the Texas (the "paying Agent/ Rag strar oo s or r©eor s nor the registration of the transfer, conversion and axch.,nge of the certificates (the "Registration Books"), and the City hereby appoints the Paying Agent/Registrar as its registrar ,and transfer agent to keep such books or records and make such registrations of transfarn, conversions and exchanges under such reasonable regulations as the City and the Paying Agent/Registrar may prescribes and the Payinj Agent/Registrar shall make such registrations, transfers, conversions and exchanges as herein provided. The Paying Agent/Registrar shall obtain and record in the Registration gooks the address of the registered owner of each Certificate to which payments with respect to the Certificates shall be mailed, as heroin providedi but it shall be the duty of each registered owner to notify the Paying Agent/Registrar in writing of the address to which payments shall be mailed, and such interest payments shall not be mailed unless such notice has been givon, The City shall have the right to inspect the Registration Books during regular business hours of the Paying Agent/Registrar, but otherwise the paying Agent/Registrar shall keep the Registration Books confidential and, unless otherwise required by law, shall not permit their inspection by anv other entity, The City shall pay the paying Agent/Registrar's standard or customary fees and charges for making such registration, transfer, conversion, exchange and delivery of a substitute Certificate or Certificatea, Registration of assignmonts, transfers, conversions and exchanges of Certificates shall be made in the manner provided and with the effect stated in the FORM OF CERTIFICATE set forth In this Ordinance. Each substitute Certificate shall bear a letter and/or number to distinguish it from each other Certificate. Except as provided in section 5(c) of this Ordinance, an authorized representative of the Paying Agent/Registrar shall, before the delivery of any such Certificate, date and manually sign said Certificate, and no such Certificate shall be deemed to be issued or outstanding unless such Certificate is so executed, The Paying Agent/Registrar promptly shall cancel all paid Certificates and Certificates surrendered for conversion and exohango. No add tional ordinances, orders, or resolutions need be passed or adopted by the City or any other body or person so as to accomplish the foregoing conversion and exchange of any Certificate or portion thereof, and the Paying Agent/Registrar shall provide for the printing, execution, and delivery of the 2 substitute Certificates in the manner prescribed heroin, and said Certificates shall be of type composition printed on paper with lithographed or steel engraved bordara of customary weight and strength, Pursuant to Vernon's Ann, Tex, Civ, St, Art, 717k•6, and particularly section 6 thereof, the duty of conversion and exchange of Certificates as aforesaid is hereby imposed on the paying Agent/ Registrar* and, upon the execution of said Certificates, the converted and exchanged certificates shall be valid, Incon- testable, and enforceable in the some manner and with the same effeot as the Certifloatee which initially were issued and delivered pursuant to this ordinance, approved by the Attorney General, and registered by the Comptroller of Public Accounts, (b) Payment of Certificates and Interest, The City hereby further apps ll I a Pay ng AgenG Rog strar to aot as the paying agent for paying the principal of and interest on the Certificates, all as provided in this Ordinance, The Paying Agent/Registrar shall keep proper records of all payments made by the cityy and the Paying Agent/Registrar with respect to the Certificatee, (o) In General, The Certificates (I) shall be issued in fully rogistora form, withomt interest coupons, with the principal of and interest on such Certificates to be payable only to the registered owners thereof, (11) may be redeemed prior to their scheduled maturities (notice of which shall be 50vdaysoprthe ior Ptoiany Aqnnt/Ragintrilir redemption by the C(1) at may least be transferred and assigned, (iv) may be converted and exchanged for other Certificates, (v) shall have the characteristics, (vi) shall be signed, coaled, executed and authenticated, (vii) the principal of and interest on the cartleicatss shall be payabls, and (viii) shall be administered and the Paying Agent/Registrar and the city shall have certain duties and reaponsibillti.es with respect to the Certificates, all as provided, and in the manner and to the effect as required or indicated, In the FORM OF CERTIFICATE set forth in this Ordinance, The Certificates i (to which nitially issued and -livered pursuant to this ordinance t attached A Compptroller of Publ: ccounts) are not required ato be, and shall not be, authe ,osted by the Paying Agent/Registrar, but on each substit-ce Certificate issued in conversion of , and exchange for any Certificate or Certificates issued under this Ordinance the Paying Agent/Registrar shall execute CERTIFICATE, 1e in PAYING form set EG forth R'sin the AOTHENTICAT10N Or CERTIFICATE, ykEjS[d covenants wltbsttFe __T_ tore ownerseo sttaa Certiflaataa that at all times while the Certificates are outstanding the City will provide a competent and legally qualified bank, trust company, financial institution, or other agency to act As and perform the services of ,Paying Agent/Registrar for the CartiPlcates under this ordinance, and that the Paying A ent/Registrar will be one entity, The City reserves the Agent/Registrar upon not less than 120 days change notice to the Paying Agent/Regiatrar, to be effective not later than 60 days prior to the next principal or interest payment date after such notice, in the avant that tho entity at any time acting as Paying Agent/Registrar (or its successor by merger, acquisition, or other method) should resign or otherwise cease to act as such, the City covenants that promptly It will appoint a competent and legally qualified bank, trust company, financial institution, or other agency 3 EXHIBIT 11 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY 1983.84 PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRE14T AID IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTION OTHER. EPA GRANTS WATER SYSTEM; atk ro u~ction 84- PW 1 - Finished Wtr Pump 425.0 425.0 0 0 0 O 84-WP-2 Rep] .4 Filter lied Media 60.0 60.U 0 U 0 0 84-WP-3 Raw Wtr Pump() ea,8 MGD) lbU,U 1bU.0 U 0 0 0 84-WP-4 Pwrline/Raw Wtr Stat, 4U.0 91010 0 U 0 U 84-WP-6 Sludge Retain. Uasin 200.( 2UO.O 0 0 0 U t375,U 875.0 0 0 U 0 Water Uist~rib ion 84-W-I Oversize WLs IUU.U IUO.U 0 U U 0 84-W-2 Miscellaneous Now WLs 26.0 26.0 U 0 0 U 84-W-3 WTP to Luop 288 to Univ. Ur. WL 737.6 737.5 U 0 0 0 84-W-4 Repl. Hillcrest St. WL 49.6 49.6 U 0 U 0 84-W-5 Rep1. WL for Panhandle Ilrainage 54.3 64.3 0 0 0 0 84-W-6 Repl. Crestwood-Wilsonwd WL 11.3 11.3 U 0 0 0 84-W-7 Repl, Gregg Street WL 12.6 12.6 U U U 84-W-8 Repl. Anderson St. WL 10.0 10.U 0 0 0 0 84-W-9 Repl. Texas Street WL IU.U 10.0 0 U U 84-W-10 Repl. Fannin Street WL 1010 lU.U 0 0 U 0 84-W-11 Repl. Mingo Road WL 6.7 0 6,1 O 0 0 84-W-12 Water Taps, Loops, Mtrs 13116 0 U 131.6 0 0 84-W-13 1-36 Service Road WL 10.0 104 0 0 0 0 84-W-14 David Mulkey WL ll.U 11.0 0 0 0 0 84-W-16 Beaird/Cushman WL 30.0 3U.0 U 0 0 0 84-W-16 Misc. Replacmt WLs 22,4 22.4 0 0 0 U 84-W-17 Mobile Equipment-Wti, Distribution 136.6 0 100.6 0 35.0 0 84-W-18 Mobile Equipment-Mtr Shop 26.0 O 24.0 0 2.0 0 84-W'-19 Repl. Tulane St. WL 13.3 0 13.3 0 0 0 84-W-20 Install Flow Cont. Valve , lu.O 10.0 U U 1,416.7 1,103.3 - 744.6 31.6 - 37.0 U 26b9U/6 Rev. 11-30-83 EXH.181T 11 (Continued) CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY 1983.84 (Continued) ($1,000's) PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID IN NUMBER DESCRIPTI014 TOTAL FUND REVENU. CONSTRUCTION OTHER WAS'fEWAT'R 'YSTEM: Wastewater Collection 84-S-1 Uversixo SLs 10010 100.0 U 0 0 U4-S-2 Miscel, New SLs 26.0 2510 U 0 U 84-S-3 US, Hwy 38U SL 68.8 58.8 U U 0 84-S-4 R;, 11 Fannin St, SL 17,1 17,1 0 0 U 84-S-5 McKinney St SL 8U.U BO.U U 0 0 84-S-6 Airport SL 42.U 42,0 U U 0 84-S-7 Sewer Taps 3515 U 0 35.5 O 84-S-8 Mobile Equip.-Sewer Collection 53.9 0 26,9 0 28,0 84-S-9 Repip. Hobson Lift ,Sta. IOU.O 100.0 0 0 U 84-S-10 Elim, Bottleneck on Bailey at Wilson/Morse/Uuncan 3U.0 3U.0 0 0 U 84-S-11 Review/Add to Cooper Creek Lift Sta. 6010 60.0 U 0 0 84-S-12 Repl, SL Panhandle Street Drainage 7b.8 76,8 O 0 0 84-S-13 Misc.Replacement zL„ 63,6 63,6 0 0 0 84-S-14 New Interceptor Swrs 349,2 349.2 U 0 0 1,08 .9 992.5 25,9 35.6 28.0 Wastewater Treatment 84-WW-1 Plant Rehabilitation 17.b 0 17.5 0 U 84-WW-2 Miscellaneous Imprvmts 1215 12.5 0 0 0 84-WW-3 Mobile Equipment 12,5 U 12,5 U 0 84-WW-4 Powerline/Hickory Crk Lift Station 0,0 40.0 0 0 U 84-WW-6 Effluent Storage Tk (ING) 200.0 200.0 0 0 0 282, b 26L.$ 315.0 0 iT Municipal Laboratory 84-ML-1 Lab improvements 1.2 0 1.2 0 0 84-ML-2 Lab Equipment 9.3 6.U 3.3 0 0 84-ML-3 Mobile Equipment 1.6 0 1.6 0 0 -=.U 6.0 ___G.U U 0 Mi scel l_a_n_eoy_s_ Ylashrack/Serv,CTr 20.0 20.0 U 0 0 84-WS-2 Covered Vehic.Sheds 5U.0 5U,U U 0 0 84-W/S-3 Mobile Equip,Adm/Engr. 7,4 0 4.0 0 3,4 84 -W/S-4 Miscell. Office Equipment/Furn, 16.U 0 15.0 0 0 84-W/S-5 City Hall Renov. 40,0 40.U 0 0 0 132.4 110.0 ` 19.0 0 - 3.4 TOTAL 1983-84 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 3,800.5 3,339.5 225.5 167.1 31.4 2669U/6 Rev. 11/30/83 EXHIBIT III BONA ISSUE $l UUO,U CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Bonds Avai1,(wtr) 29610 WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY Bonds Avai1.(Swr) 460,0 1983.84 Total $1, ($1,000`s) PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT AID IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTION OTHER WATER SYSTEM, >V-alrerr u~ction 84-WP-1 Finished Wtr Pump 426,0 426.0 0 0 0 84-WP-2 Ropl, 4 Filter Bed Media 50.0 6010 0 0 0 84-WP-3 Raw Wtr Pump (1 each 8 MGD) 160,0 16010 0 0 0 ~Ou . 84-WP-5 Pwrline/Raw Wtr Sta. 46T6-0 A,U.u `U `6 Water Distribution 8 -W~ 1 - Oversize WLs 15010 160,0 0 U 0 84-W-2 Miscellaneous New WLs 26,0 26.0 0 0 0 84-W-4 Repl. Hillcrest St. WL 49.5 49,6 0 0 0 844.1-21 Repl. WL for Panhandle Drainage 64,3 54.3 0 0 0 84-W-6 Ropl. Crestwood-Wilsonwd WL 11.3 11.3 0 0 0 84-W-*/ Repl. Gregg Street WL 12.6 12.5 0 0 0 84-W-8 Repl, Anderson St. WL 10.0 10,0 0 0 0 84-W-9 Repl. Texa; Street WL 10.0 10.0 0 0 0 64-W-10 Repl. Fannin Street WL 10,0 1010 U 0 0 84-W-15 Repl, Mingo Road WL 6,7 0 6.7 0 0 84-W-12 Water Taps, Loops, Mtrs 131.6 0 0 131.6 0 84-W-16 I-35 Service Road WL 10.0 10.0 0 0 0 84-W-17 David Mulkey WL 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 84-W-18 Beaird/Cushman WL 30.0 30.0 0 0 0 84-W-13 Mobile Equipment-Wtr Distribution 135.6 0 100.6 0 35.0 84-W-14 Mobile Equipment-Mtr Shop 26.0 0 24.0 0 2.0 844-19 Repi. Tulane St. WL 13.3 0 13.3 0 0 84-W-20 Install Flow Cont. Valve 10.0 1010 0 0 U NTX M.6 T3T. 6 -37,u WASTEWATER SYS M; wastewater Collection 84-S-1 Oversize SL 100.0 100.0 0 0 0 84-S-2 Miscellaneous New SL 26.0 26.0 0 0 0 84-S-3 U. S. Highway 380 SL 68.8 68.8 0 0 0 84-S-4 Repi. Fannin St. SL 17.1 17.1 0 0 0 84-S-6 Airport SL 42,0 42.0 0 0 0 84-S-7 Sewer Taps 36.5 0 0 36.6 0 84-S-8 Mobile Equipment -Swr Collection 63.9 0 26,9 0 28.0 84-S-9 Repip. Hobson Lift Sta. 100.0 100.0 0 0 0 84-S-10 Eiim. Bottleneck on Bailey at Wilson/Morse/Duncan St 30.0 30.0 0 0 0 84-S-11 Review and Add to Cooper Creek Lift Station 60.0 50.0 0 0 0 84-S-12 Repl. SL Panhandle Street Drainage 76.8 76.8 0 0 0 39T-T W. 7 1n. 9 X6 29.0 2669U/3-Rev.11/30/83 f±XHTBIT 1iI {Continued) WATER AND WASTEWATERILi'ry 1983-84 ($1,000's) PROJECT PROJECT 8ONU CURRENT AID IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTION OTHER Wastewater Treatmgnt 8 a 4- ~ 3 M1sce11anoousilmprvmts 12,5 12,6 107,6 0 0 84-WW-4 Mobile Equipment 12.6 0 1216 p 0 84-WW-6 Powerline/Hickory Creek 0 Lift Station 4U,0 40,0 0 0 0 --gF. -g 62,6 30,0 0 0 Municial Laboratory 874-1L-1 La Improvements 1.2 0 84-ML-2 Lab Equipment 9.3 6.0 1~2 0 0 84-IIL-3 Igobile Equipment 1.6 U 303 0 0 TT ,-o -T.0 6, b 0 0 0 Mi ceilaneou 9--4/5-3 -Mobile Miscel, EOfficeadm,/Engr, 7.4 0 4,U 0 3,4 84-W/S-6 Equip/Furn, .U 0 15,0 U 0 400.0 40,0 0 62.4 X0,0 T9`.0 `es -1.4 TOTAL 1983-84 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2,127,8 1,666.8 226.0 167.1 68,4 2669U/4 Rev. 11-30-83 rt EXHIBIT IV CAPITAL IMPROVEMFNT PLAN NO ADDITIONAL BONUS WATER ANU WASTEWATER UTILITY Bonds Avail.lWtr) 295,0 1983.84 Bonds Avail,Swr) 460,0 411000's) Total $755,0 PROJECT PROJECT BUNU CURRENT AID IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CUNSTRUCTION UTHER WATER SYSTEMI Water P"roTtion 84-WP-1 Fin,Wtr Pump 425,0 425,0 U 0 0 84-WP-2 Rep1,4 filter bed med, 6U.U 6010 0 0 U 84-0-3 Raw Wtr,Pmp (1 Ea. 8 MGD) 0 0 0 0 0 84-WP-5 Pwrline/Raw Wtr Sta, 486, U q n, U i0! -Q ~ Water Distribution 84-W-1 Oversize Wtrlines 7U.6 7U,5 0 0 U 84-W-2 Miscel, New WLs 0 0 U U 0 84-W-4 Repl, Hillcrest St. WL U 0 U 0 0 84-W-21 Repl, I4L for Panhandle Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 84-W-6 Repl.ee Crestwood-Wilsonwd WL U 0 0 0 U 84-W-7 Repl, Gregg Street WL 0 0 0 U 0 64-W-8 Repl, Anderson St, WL 0 0 0 0 U 84-W-9 Repl, Texas Street 4§L 0 0 U 0 0 84-W-10 Repl. Fannin Street WL 0 0 0 0 0 84-W-16 Rep), Mingo Road WL 6,7 0 6,7 0 0 84-W-12 Water Taps. Loops, Mtrs 131.6 O 0 131.6 U 84-W-16 I-36 Service Road WL 0 0 U 0 0 84-W-17 David Mulkey WL 0 0 U 0 U 84-W-18 Beaird/Cushinan WL 0 0 0 0 U 84-W-13 Mobile Equipment - Wtr Distribution 136,b U 100,6 0 35.0 84-W-14 Mobile Equipment-Mtr Shop 26.0 0 24.U U 2.0 84-W-19 Repl. Tulane St, WL 13.3 0 13,3 0 0 84-W-20 Install Flow Control valve 0 0 U U U 383.7 7-0.0 1-916 '13T.6 37.0 WASTEWATER SYSTE ; aW-'sTewa er o e c t i o n 84-S-1 Oversize SL 66.0 66.0 0 0 0 84-S-2 Miscellaneous New SL 0 U U U U 84-S-3 U. S. Highway 380 SL, 0 0 0 0 0 84-S-4 Rep1, Fannin St, SL U 0 0 U 0 84-S-6 Airport SL U 0 U 0 0 84-S-7 Sewer Taps 36.6 U 0 36.6 0 84-S-8 Mobile Equip,-Sewer collection 63.9 0 25.9 0 28.0 84-S-9 Repip. Hobson Lift Sta. 76.0 76.0 0 0 0 84-S-10 Elim. Bottleneck/Bailey at Wilson/Morse/Ouncan 30.U 30.0 0 0 0 84-S-11 Review & Add to Cooper Creek Lift Station 0 U 0 0 0 84-S-12 Repl. SL Panhandle Street Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 26590/1/Revised 11/30/83 60,4 -1-i ,0 25.9 3E6 28.0 EXHIBIT IV (Continued) CAPITAL IMPROVE14ENT PLAN WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY 1983.84 ($1,000's) PROJECT PROJECT 80NU CURRENT AID IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTRUCTION OTHER Wastewater Treatment W-2 ant ehab. 1716 0 17.6 0 U 6 0 U W-3 Miscel, Imprymts 1215 12,6 0 0 0 84-WW-4 Mobile E uip. 12.6 0 1215 U 0 84-WW-5 Pwrline/Hick, Crk Lift Station 0 0 0 0 0 -47,5 L.5 To,0 0 0 Municipal Laboratoo Imprvmts 1,2 U 112 0 0 84-M1-2 Lab Equipment 9.3 6.0 3.3 0 0 84-ML.3 Mobile Equipment 1.5 0 1,6 0 0 Misc011aneo S S4WRTM Mobile Equip.-Adm/Enyr, 7.4 0 4.0 0 3,4 84-W/S-4 Miscel, Office Equipment/Furn, 15.0 0 1610 0 0 84-W/S-5 City Hall Renov, 10.0 10,0 0 O 32. -1 U.7 -S. U -a `3.4 TOTAL 1983-84 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1,216.0 755.0 226,6 167.1 68.4 2669U/2 Rev. 11-30-83 M E M O R A N D U M DATF,i Novomber 30, 1983 TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager Y~WMI Charles Watkins$ Senior Planner SUBJEC'Ti Discussion of annexation boundary ndjustmonts for Mayhill and South Bonnie Brae areas A, MAYIICL.L AREA Five alternatives for boundary Adjustments in the proposed Mayhtll annexation are presented for considerations 1. Annex the entire 1125 acres as originally proposed, 2. Annex the 300 acres owned by the Henry S, Miller Company, the two (2) proposed mobile home developments and the land in between the oxit=ting city limit and the proposed devel- lopment, 3. Annex the Henry S. Miller tract, the proposed mobile home developments and the minimum amount of land in between the city limit and the proposed development. 4. Annex only the Henry S, Miller Company tract, 5. Decline to annex any of the property in this area. B. SOUTH BONNIE BRAE 1, Annex the entire 367 acres as originally proposed, 2. Annex only a 500 foot wide strip of Jones tract south of the intersection of Bonnie Brae and Railroad and the balance of the original proposal, 3. Same as #2 above but also delete 1,6 acres belonging to Sue Wilson. 4. Decline to annex any of this area, n x rti Y• ri . t fiu~:>- : fl t 'I?1 Atl~il,1 " ~ I Cooper,' '~f ---•F 'i.:>x.Aa,: .r r T .2.6- L 1 MOTT -.70 1 Jim Tom- ^ 3';:=•4 +-~-••--I f ~ ' ' { ! i ~ ~ z ,mil`: ~ 1 'I I~I• . ('Tf~-•: I ~,t, / ~^j,,,~rPP ti~'::{hii ',.r- ~ I r + 1" I I IN (I,. 'I ' .I L r Y Z •l ri X, I ~ r I I Ci ti, t ti. I * J5 ~o to r Foslrr Fi G. 5+ G I I \ e ~ H hl Re yV~Ili • -lll. i_C OC I C IY V• \`~I fryr ' o, SNQ'DY r ~Le•>:. t 1.x,1' µ ~ ' H.Sno~PyAM 64: • coal rn 7H r n ~3ar,h Ir` POP 441 _ .f I'I r v' ' \ \ i I Cason 1 ivory Aro~v Rd• C Via' ~•~r f . :'1 Old I . 1 I 0 qtr- ' IAIfM i' ' E C f ! ;r'jo. A y.0 e 1 1 ba' /ri~c //8.6 ' E W ~'I' 77 ~tb• 1 ~ ~plkEvl~'ty 1 J1 a ° ti i t ♦ 21E'':i v ; f IELD I t j,... Q oases Ilk- ` r . HICKORY -to --met, 0 3 'CREEK b" 1 r WIN Oil tk NA Mit •IOr HIINIA6y •el ••-i-~~✓. T4 Hit I' '4: C • Lea t1'~ry~ CBI; Will lerte ~ IV% 14~ ~ +r ai ! 1,11~1•itl . , i 11 ' ♦ t Y w'• ~Sr. .~,....'y . 1 Ll 1 ~ `,1i1717~? t v ~ L.{ Iikt lJ , V: r../\ ~ r: i L \ ."i I o • 1, a•t > ~.r^. ~ . ~ ' •'317 ~F PQ ~ ~ i +'t 17 }I 1..... ' it i f i I 4 ,4 1 • 1 y •i~ t 1 , , ! 2.5 ` 14 r 3~ •Jy}: .0 All r 6 [ FT ;1j ` O~"Y • 1~i a5'b 0~ ~F , 1 forte; R r~ 26 * r F ,Corn r r ' ~-5r"' C,1 toy, kri C ( mfr, /SHADY' ' • • r• ~ r ~v, Snoo'yS~io~etbtd,,' ~ \".li .♦RyDn' d, ' ~ • I ;'.r .,~3arih 41// • ~toN 1' CQRIN7K' ns Q s 1 / V's, of) ekory~~Crklek Rd• • x 15 r/1 35 '•y4w44r1 t ~i+ 3 ' 61 X010 • ry .fib ' IAJton ` W )7' v 'FAS HICKORY \ I CREEK s.01 AI an -z ap PCP 216 her ,e10,k~r . ~'•u~ ~ k e p . M+e lkor H17l'Rd••,r ~ s• r~r ~Ki M•• . a c .G„y y / • Old =Hllt LDn._Y. V. r:~s' , v `V'Sr a RIB, y~ ✓~'v ` 1 tf►~. h '.i r/ rS p?I, I',~ ~I 11q J • . rril v,. s-K_ir t,:~ '''tr• I , 1l rill I.I,L.'}~.1 r{~f m ^ I Q , •~r}~. 2_ 4~1 l~ .1 L... • r.~.l l Iii' ''~Ii"1 v ' 1 ...ICCC. J _ A 360 ''z si 1 }`ti Y.t,M p 3 77 R rt••i ;:;'ran ii 0.1 'r r~}-•• Y . -Yi itt .d z n'Q,•~ . \ I r , .•v. 1 . i ; 4 .Y'S~..r ?h. •~'~K -iR'✓. 1V _ • ~4\ •v Illr~ l ..Y.. ~ I: .{fit •:yt.~':.u•_~ }t}~• . ~ ~ 'I11~., 1'• :i'F ' •V}tl El ~ \-~~1, 'ris `-3 •y' h,~.!'~~~...~I V~I~I :-^-+,`T"' I ' .w11 t t I ~.J ',1 ° 1'`•` whfl'~~ ~r I` i i ~ . . ~ ' I I r~'-' • 7 5 tll• ' ' ' 'v ~ P-~'. K • ~ ~i # lh\~~'+i41''~~ ~•t~ •'hr_.R. z ,..•-...rT y ~ / t f ' Q , \f - r .y~!{: `ti.S«ti :-«v t 1, ~.!I --k L'KiNf d' !JzJ 35 ,o Qs . host r d 1 a 6 e- wr U ' 06 1+ Om 4 7 ' 2t61, ~ 1 d~~ R i ~ it t~M~~ . • •tN,p GoCy • / •'Ryen•Rd • + q I • I,J3orth _x H' - he COPINT x t~ r y / POP4I . son O\ • -0 - 1 ` /olG, 11 T ` Fil /atr+ I t o, t w • t , v, y AK I It t C • h o :i MILD j~ `SJ~~~ A w /E.6 • 216 I r- ~G .i F ♦ ~.<'re5 HICKORY `1~•. 1` t{` A It . .:s,i•_ •i _-l'''a~C'~'~r~,~,A POF 219, f a 3C 0t M, v R ~'r • Alt • HI<•►ory HitI'RdY~• ~ ~ • ♦ ti-:C«: j r ~H-' ~ ~ ~ min' , K.H16 ' H0r •RdK1 T7.u 4% Old LOftO •HDYplo• Rd i , nv i y'' • r" . 41 f t~`V i ~ r ~r e I` •y r c . .i i fit. 1 , 1 r ml r `K I n 'It . M. . f ~ M . , ...v.1 tiff a f ••t-'~ Y :ti :-Y - Y Y • ' 18 i r I M i. ~ i ZZ.l •'1 l• _'l 'rS~ "'s 71 I Y ♦ 1 I ~l'~kl Foster R ~,1 e26 T Rdl cM Y s~ to r l ~ ~y ` Me-'~-~~ ; ni. N ,I~' ,r. ~ i- ~ .r l • %.1~~ POC LIU 6, RC I) ~ S I , I I o~ ; SHA DY' } h7;~, . 1^ :L,j,~. 2•,o'r `ti M SHORES' Pop • CORINTH' 13a11h IC.b` P 0 P 44+1 } 3i 1 _ k ~c • lakory ~Crc~k Ad* , . I I Faso y k. ~ . .liowlln I 3S ' 3 ii ~ ' f e ~•;3 • e~ /OIL IIh ` l { C vi~ty a• ~8,b 1. r ' l ~d ,T"~\ ° ~F'# \o lk6.IW1r77 r 1 r LAKE (ArIiELD, HICKORY ~L" . , ti..~e=''~ CREEK a • r~ s 0 i e! A I O n 1• 40" trC " z mod, p~ r pop • '.L= Hia~ior Hit i'Rd\, .~i"~ f' J r. r d • • IMCAi4 •HIII LGne marPI06 fm -A w~ L „ C i ' i,y _ t. i~'~~,',` \lt1. ! I i ,tr~~~ r f~i L..L% II ~ :•wr., ~ r:~ li I '1: ni .#~KI 71♦M ~ ♦ • .~~....~rt..^_, .~-...I :,2.:::.. f7 it f3 i a♦..j X ~ •'Vii I^4~ ~'I r.rrm r1 I IU :?i~: t'.[•' Y .4 • . I, I G~ooper,,t ~ ~ A Y- 0,1 o •-,-'f,= _ ,t~' 3 7 7 r r' C-: • ' W1 ` ti ! i 1 Yl R • ' u \ of 1 I M \ 'iT all P r ~+ti I•~ ~ I I i J : 77 + 'O ~~>'1 z. '~31' ~O~\I ..111'1! ..J ~.1 ~ ~ Sri ~ ~i t i ~{-sz 5 l` I 1 •:ti' I 1 ~1 ~ ( .1111 x + • f ~ ' L 7 ~ /1- !q .R' L- 1.•• 1 F C t•~-~ ,tom - `~/~I\~ Poo A; orn Rd,' 4 'st. ` ~ooP .t. Fry 7 POCh1Ut kC ) K E ' rar SHAY - r~.. Hok-E Ln_1 . ♦ r z q Pop S604 y /I ~.Ryan'Rd ' . /'o q - 0" 0 • ° 'R nea d C O RI N T H' '41 ' ~x.., •1 w / POP 441 W ~ ' 1 . I • 915 I ~ ~ V S 011 ' . ~ -l1 F. ~ ftd #j +.5 36 IY i r ,y I J; Or • ,pb : a / /Old 'ly ro!k ton LAKE 'C • i • ' J\ a. ^'`e Ib.6 • X16 Wz r 77 1 3 (AIR VI )e, ! FIELD Not. 0/ 5.''.\ h_ F~ ~~,ras " HICKORY *;a \ E • °r s~' y t ' CREEK Y y •.Itr♦ ♦a~. Hie ♦koryH141.11 p•ul ffH ri~ 1 ~ K-7 ;4 00 • j b t ~r b m ;p{thid EHII1~„L~o,n~• ~ Cb~ j - , ~y,~~~~~~ N V~ I 3 3r .I! 'rt' i lE • tiF.., w.~ ,3E~ 1 t J 0 C k {/0 n Rd. Rd ef, ,In IE i1el ,lei i. <tl7 ' , r, H td • 1 C ~ t 1~ ~ . + l 1t \ , 'y hrl ..'}li tlef ` 1 X Ohiit al Rd ~ h ilia ~ .N ~ a ~fE .1 Il ~11 ~ i r t y ~Iam C Ce . a ' ,.r•~' • : . ,I! i 1':1 i lo:h,~'e7rrl, Aniiil ~ , ~ e• I , t , 1~`~ aT O~trl . C 0 I.0 d. ~ ~ie Iw~ 1515 ♦ A ' 111 1 C 3,~'•i 4 If I :+Idt i+d/1 f ~ 1 ^ 4r F • t G.,yE Ad. Zla ~ \\\~S / VM a ~ PAS 'Qrt BO ~ 810 ,.'.t~ ~ rt~` I J' 2445 b i r ~ µry7 ~ t~; i. y . • ~ V Ion& 'Lill 6 46 #4 . ti RDA 'r, c ~p SD ✓ ` . Ryon Rd 6 Few 06 1 rrvih f M, Ifillild old 0 i~kr Ht,ekory'•~Cte,~t~ Rd' V♦ wlk,a' re pP rBrusA : 6~ai t 11d. ' ' 6 38 ~ ,j Johnson n P~~~~ . • . . ,r 1 ♦O. /Old 13 j'. r • w l, ~A t M I 010, % wlotd Rd. e- yle '•('irOV 10 y,; '~i''' it~ J T~\'C./f",r•.\r. ~•E; r'Y~^ • . e~ ' ~r~. -Al W / ♦ L ok • .L.t . tHic~kory HlfRd'„ I Y. ARGYLE p Olo '1 r, * r - Z-V ooHerr: le♦ _,7---'•' 'E•: ~l z Otonld S• 16 ♦ RG y., y, _.r^"• r.till. 5 o rn D e v I s. R d I a r kia 6 C ((t e w • i `r I 1. r- ~ U ~ r ' ~ U N Y~ I IIE , i r n ~ 0 C k ~On R6,~i~-~-- Rd •ti ~ .car i:iuii is iil fi ~rilr iii ,y i "i ;r'° I i ~3~ i K l a i.. , ' } 3 Cooprr; it rt c ,It g,y~~~ i,'?H1 •~i-.' !10 ?'6 tr,i 380 ` u,''.a • .l H, \ . j~ • 40~ .(o • 3 y " IG C Ski I • s R d j ~,:.C o l e ,I-..... r^ ~ , , ~ ,...,._,__,,,,,,~t . . ,.,1. ~ I;, 0 An 4-6 11~ tit t:: . la ~ prln •!tdl7td. .I 3s ,~OF"'y' C 2 y~. p fir,,, _,n.. v J~ -f , Y .~,ti • ~ FAS 1445 ~A ,3 c I ' } 4 , r \ H. L Ivel . a I Ie~rOnfh . • r .'Ryon Milli P4'. " COrrvfh - , JAllr 1 ~Q • o t 1 r • b ' H~tlery`Crolt 'Rd• iin~ 0p r~ ,:~8rusb •Gialk' F~ PILbY KNOB ' a38' i rI Johnson n Q~~~r b,~r • t Old I. Aitcy to C, \ w f or Rd r'y ' e ~a Jc~t~•ryyla raw 0 s Ord d • • -.-~'1 .f ~Q y , • . , l «'r.~,. +O ' • `pl i • e , • i/t • ~ • ~ b ~ • ' tip' ':~•r ~r~. r+-~. t L 4 ztilVr s, I~ A l 40A (r' . / , ,het ' e~. y~ , 0 k i, u•. \ . . L °'o` •w,.1AS:~l it skory Hlll4•Ar1 \.•ul A RGYL E % old Justin Ao PDDde3 ~KHICYQ,r~•Hllf •Rdj • ti: eh Y • d 10!,.. b r 1 •y•~ mfr •DSChId •►.f ~Som Oovl64Rd•, r. b! • ~•4rolot IN : Iry1 • ~K ► N• '~G, ~•r r `cJ o c k ion Itrl, uJ.S+t,. Rd . , ~S: hilt i jl ~+hl ~r i' '~•1.. I 11h+~ i .4 il h LLLLLL ' :«~Alm'•AA~It of Pd a I ~F ' Q~I E d i. i ~ 1 e~:,~ 511 irl. 1 ''1~ `'?.8 y-'' 1 .4 d, d 1. C'am` V `1 . S k I I v♦ A d ~ r'.""__ . i-~ass~" 1 ` r ;lip rnyrti+,`u rtllr!r4. Or c 14 1 7' 41 10 • I G~ r 1. J ~o j 1o Q6 Cy CS v ON tU m~ o Old a FA S~ pi; oonr~ Sro MS. Llvtly Ad J ~i• 0' r 4• R \1Vy~. d -11 ^V a fi'r' .l~rOnlh o / L • f 31 5 1' Alit % e \ 0., , 1\ 1 ~<<, C-~a • it Mliekory~ Cre;tk~ Rd' i al 1.07 KMd08 i:: , i ~ ?Ct~ r8rueb »,Fr~i k y i--,s.~--r,+.. e38' r JoAnIon nE ~r iP/~,., •O. • • 'F/i ,'a~ ~.F FOIE r J e /n rte I" a ' ~r • , e ..ii'~... e / • . c /C ' la y .1, wlo d~ ad •Cif OY / ~•✓C~14~9 y1f • , ~ JJ"`• ~ ~tp r\ ~N!'~'• G 1a / r t y • • '.C rte" . . ~ ~ e ~ ~S ' ~ ~ ell f R t V• , , • t GY . L,t • . Hie skory HI'N k41% op JHIeMIIM Rd . • . v ' y o0cniyE Ord jo On Y sib Y " . aHor loe a iCtchid ~,ti . '~<dfn [\Oad• I': r !t•1 , d C Hof Plot ad i ~ ' d.C • .;i^ 0 l _T- 1 ` yr • rl `a J p C k L On 'Rd V ~ ~d . , 'T'r•~'~'j irijj~ii t I~ lE` ~~il it ~lr,', u t r ''",rya i «.,~i, r I ~ 1 ip o ^A f i \ i~G 1 Q^ p m .7 1 1 Z g ' F' 14 M C, 0 3bOr• 'v ~•A 1 r j :II,, 1 . . « r~ III fill 6kI1 1TomC0lor f. ~ tr 'i.:}a+~' Irtluo :;sil:, ~ r I ' i r t lr:: ti t O o o P45 S u aTOm• tiI. ~c Iblb , i.1 d.{~° a jr'•' ti 6 ,:,•C ,row ~Jr Jam' ~f. ty OR0co". IV e ro rU/ fA5 r~ Bro Rd = 4 r , tlip i of r' o a Bo / 2x45 / S N. L lvtl Rd 1 / K P • 1 A+ O ' r l ~ Ida ~ • o V i a ~B~oncA e , 'Lone .`Ryon Ad s ID'S • r~ "W 0 ) W .a X577 , ~ `r y / / 4. Q' c Ito ~1 ' ~tl f-•.-► Q0~• r~J _4L y ~ y.~~ N~ehory~'~CreoY Rd• 1/ ~ I~ir'' ( . ~p 1. ::'A~u~l ~I•~r IR. P11 LOT •13E8 pQ l~ O ' ' .h i~ /~l • • o~ ~L. 1, Old ~1 44 li 00 J viord 'R d, i~ 'ere l0i R - ~ .,.:•.'~-1 ''til p , . ' rr- r- ' S .f 10 n ••rl . I I, „ p` •.''.~~~•A`n#HIC •~Oly Hlril'Rd, 'r, 6 u 1 arc ARGYLE t:z v »oc<3 ova Juttrn CH 1a r •Mlif •Rdj 1 e- . c ~ f ~ . ru c e Mar 100 o 1 . • • ti~ i • chid ar. • cc Oov,).Rd'I r / '•Hc6lo•Rd" • 't, c ~r- 9. r ~ V . r i y , FA a: Le-A ' I.S / t ~ u' r G r CITY COUNCIL MINUTED November 11 1983 The Council convened into A work session to discuss the new user fee rates in too city of Denton. MEMBERS PRESENT1 Mayor Stewartj Mayor Pro Tom RiddIQ aoergerI Council Members Alford, Barton, Chew, Hopkins and Stephens City Manager, City Attorney, and City Secretary MEMBERS ABSENTI None Assistant City Manager 1o Kean distributed minutes of various board and commisslon meetings where the now fees had bean diaoussed, McKean also distri"tod a compilation of survey results which showed the City of Denton s ourrent fees, the oonsultant recommendation, the staff recommendation and the foes currently being oollocted by various other cltiee Council Member Hopkins asked if no comparison numbers were listed in the table, could the Council assume that no fee was being charged. McKean responded yes. Council Member Hopkins stated that he believed the Council would require more time to study the comparisons and the proposed Lees and suggested that the passage of the ordinance at this time was prenature. Mayor Stewart stated that the collection of these fees was Iooorporated into the budget Council Member Hopkins stated that the fees which wore being presented ware completely different from those which had been considered previously. McKean stated that the only urgenoy in approving the ordinance would be the time lost in collecting the foes and the City was already one month into the new fiscal year. Council Member Stephens stated that the approval of the budget had been based on the incorporation of these fees as recommended by the Griffith study and the staff. City Manager Hartung stated that the staff had taken the Griffith study and backed off some of the fees which were believed to be too high. The staff had estimated $650,000 in revenue from the increased foes when preparing the budget. These increased included overhead costs as well as direct oosts, gg tat thenfeesraobhighophat the 431tizena couldsnot"use"citybfaoilltlesg It was also concerned about the zoning fees but understood that the increase would be spread over 5 years. Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported f that that was the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning woCommission but be assessedtforhzoningfchanges vid of leasrthant9 lots. Larger areas and more oomplicated zoning transactions would cost more. Council Member Hopkins then asked if one person came in to plat more than 5 acres, what would the new fee be. Meyers responded $1650. Council Member Hopkins stated that he felt that was too high. Hartung stated that the itaff was requesting information on whether or not to institute all of the teas, some ok the fees, or to reduce the amount of some or all of the foes. C1Cy Council Ml nu tea Mae ing of ovamber 1, 1989 Page Two Council Member Stophens stated that he felt these teas must be Implemented Slowly and Jnoremontally. mmonth had already had been IngorpovAtO4 budgetgandsthatoOno that if the fees owere not approved, other cuts would have to be made, Mayor Pro Tem Riddlesperger asked if the Inoreased fees would reduce the volume of permJts Issued or the use of the Perks and Recreation facilities. Meyer responded that in the case of zoning, the reduction of requosr,s had been factored Into the projected revenues. Counoil Member Hopkins stated that he felt the Increases should be Implemented over a graduated period of time, Mayer ropor.tod than each year costs Increased and a gradual Implementation would cause the City to lose more due to inflation. Council Member Hopkins stated that It required as much staff time to deal with an historic landmark designation as a plat but no increase in the Casa for the designation was presented, Meyer responded that the Griffith study did not recommend an Increase, Council Member Hopkins stated that persona applying for historic landmark zoning stand to gain access to low interest loans. A Meyer replied that other cities do not charge at all, Counoil Member Ho kJos asked why the Animal Control fee for adoption of an animal was 10.00 whin the actual cost to the City was $98.74. Assistant City Manager. Svehla responded that if the fee were set too high, no one would adopt and the animal would have to be put down, Council Member Hopkins asked why the City would inspect the Installation of gasoline or LPG tanks since the persons who performed the Installation were bonded, Svehla responded that the Fire Marshal or Fire Inspector would perform the City Inspection, Council Member Hopkins stated that the same would be true of those persons installin3 sprinkler systems and he was thinking of the City's liability. g City Attorney Taylor responded that there was no more liability on these Inspections than on an electrical inspection, Council Member Stephens asked If the Parks Board had considered the proposed fee increases, Assistant City Manager McKean responded that the board members had been contacted by telephone and a special meeting had bean held to consider the foes. Contractual fees would be discussed at a future meeting. At the suggestion of Council Member Stephens the Council and staff began reviewing the individual fees on the hand out material, The review was not completed prior to the beginning of the regular meeting, The Council then convened Into the regular meeting at 7100 p.m, in the Council Chambers, M Ci Counoil Minutes MoetCqq ing of November 1, 1983 Pago Three MEMBERS PRESENTi Mayor Stowartl Mayor Pro Tom Riddlee argerl Council Members Alford, Dorton, Chew, Hopkins and Stephens City Manager, City Attorney, and City S,3oretary MEMBERS AdSENTI None 1, The Mayor presented a retirement plaque to Mr, Dickey Charles of the Denton Fire Department for 20 years of service. Mr. Charles was present to accept the plaque and the thanks and beat willies of the Council upon his retirement, Dr. Ray Stephens presented the Sesquicentennial flag to the city of Denton. Dr, Stephens stated that the City of Denton was the second city in the state to be sanctioned as a Sesquicentennial City. This ;!as a result of thu efforts of the Sesquicentennial Committee chaired by Ms. Pet Wards, The flat would be flown at City Hall until the end of the Sesquicentennial celebration. 3. The (,ouncil considered approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 18, 1983, Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to approve the Minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 4., Consent Agenda Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked to have Item A,2 removed from the Consent Agenda, Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item A,2, Motion carried unanimously, Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that it problem had arisen on what should be included on bid Y 9197 for the elevating scraper, Mr. Chuck Fancham from Darr Equipment appeared before the Council and stated that he had held a lengthy discussion with Tom Shaw of the City Purchasing Department. Thera had been a misunderstanding on the interpretation of the bid, Mayor Stewart asked if Mr. Feacham still had a problem with the award recommendation on the bid. Mr, Fenoham stated no, Council Member Hopkins stated that in looking at the bids on the scraper elevator, one company had offered $5,800 for the present scraper. If this amount was deduoted, it would appear that there was a $9,400 difference. City Attorney Taylor responded that the bidder would have to bid the scraper separately. The bidder who bid $5,800 did not bid on the item itself. Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agant, reported that the tabulation shoot indicated that item 2 was a trade-in. Item 2,A was a purchaaa, This option had been extended to bidders who wanted to buy the old equipment. The bids were put together as a lease/purchase. These two item had been discussed with Darr Equipment. Bids were not allowed to be changed after the9 had been opened, The Council could instruct Purchasing to reject ell bids and rabid. Shaw also reported that if the bide from Darr and Plains were compared with an allowance for a deduction for the tires taken, the bids were vary close. , 1 City C00no#1 Minutes Meeting of November 11 1483 1'480 Pour Connoll Member Hopkins asked if Shaw felt that every bidder was provlded with uha same Information. Shaw responded yes. Council Member Hopkins asked why it was introduced into the bid that Persons could bid only on the scraper, Shaw replied that it was felt that It was to the bast advantage for the City to take the money for the scraper. Council Member Hopkins asked if the 91903 met specifications, Shaw responded that It did not as there was a problem with the OePoctment waa satisfied °thatedthey equipt ent uhtuh tthe Pcity sl4a i buying was the beat on the market, y Was ow s Motions carriedm6tton1 with Council Member Hopkins voting Bid !1 9197, pkinsens voLiting ng nay, Consent Agendai A. Bids and Purchase Order$1 1. Bid ll 9195 Filter Bed Media 2. Old N 9197 Elevating Scraper 3. Bid # 9198 Dictating equipment 4. Purchase Order p 59578 to T.R,A,K.S, 5. Purchase Order 0 60008 to Herb's Body Shop 6. Purchase Orders # 60284, 60435 and 60436 all to 18M 8. Plata and Replatsi 1. Approval of the prellminary rep let of the aMendsqZoniuite ssionurecommnds approval.jlanning 21 Approval of the final r and p apes[ of lots 3, 41 5 6 Plaaningrt and lot 2. goer Addition. approval,) B Commission recommends 31 Approval of the final replat of lot 2B, Denton ZoningnCommission recommends Approval.) Planning and 4. Approval of the final replat of the Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Paymentai 1. Approval of payment of annual dues to the American Public Power Association in the amount of X9,246,35. D. Contracts; 1. Approval of contract with Jerry Fredricks for construction management during the renovation of the west wing of the Munlcipal Building (formerly the Police section). City Council minutes Maatingg Of November 1, 1983 Page Flve 2 Approval oP a contract with R4SOURCES, Inc. for purchase of Customer Service training program, 3. Approval of a contract for $1$0000 with priority Systems, Inc, to provide programming sup OrC tto the city of Denton on an as neededp basis primarily In Cho area of syarams programming but not limited to this area, 4, Approval of a contract with TRES Corporation to provide programming support to the City of Denton on an as needed oasts In the area of Payroll/Personnel System known as "EIS" and the Utility Billing System known as "CIS", Carroll BThe away between approval West disposition i and o highland streets, (D-33) David is llson, Development Review Planner, stated that there were 2 Theufirstbrequesthwas oestimatedr toxbess,83 aoreowith ythei widthiand asptthisk ere B could be Mr. Dle developedlnandd was currently dzoneditfor two-family housing. A condition for the disposition was that a 20 foot strip be retained behind wthe curb to allow for water lines and to avoid curb cuts. Carroll Boulevard was believed to have 140 feet of rigght of way, some of which was from old Center Street and some ofotheaUngar Bpoark planning which wasmb being Review by mthe tParka Board for areas such as this, The Parks Board had requested to be Invol whichtcouldibeoutilizer]aswhich small,would linearaffect pathis rks.type Thisfcould be Incorporated Into the Development Review Committee Proeadures, The Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the disposition, Dr, Robert LaPorte, Chairperson of the gg Planning and Zoning Counmoilibut hepdisegdr ethat d with therPlanningvand Commupnity Development . The staff fe sta f f lt that the City should hold this land but the P lanning and Zoning Commission thought it should be sold. Areas on Carrol Council Boulevard decide on what was behad at andn the PU feoltetheaproperty should be sold to place It back on the tax rolls, Mayor Stewart asked what Dr. La Forte's opinion was on curb cuts on Carroll Boulevard, LaPorte responded that if the Council allowed Carroll Boulevard to develop commercially, ourb outs would have to be made. HIS opinion was that these curb outs should be held to a minimum, Mayor Stewart asked what the PU recommendation was an allowing a commercial strip on Carroll Boulevard, LaPorte responded that a greater amount of activity in that direction had been experienoed during the last year. Ms, Linnie McAdams, member of the parks board, reported that the Board strongly urged the Council not to approve either of the two disposition requests before them, Both of these areas had the otantial to be utilized as a park or walking area. The Board felt Boule and beautification icnowoa lovely pdrive and hei ParkspBoardlwag workingoon a master plan for parks in the entire City, The Parks and Recreation Department was short of funds and could utilize this property Instead of acquiring new property in the future. Ms. McAdams urged the Council not to dispose of the property before the master plan could be oomptated, 1 Cik Counoil Minutes Mowing of November It 1943 Page Six CounolI Member Chew asked what type of park could be bui It on the property. M Adams responded that a linear park such as the one which was north of Congress with the gazebo could be constructed on the property, Counoil Member Chew stated that there was a problem in maintaining the existing parks McAdams stated that the Parks Board was very encouraged and excited by the neighborhood participation which had been offered at Briarcliff park and believed thIN oonoept would work here. Council Member Chew stated that he could not see the logio of a park located in an area which was mostly commercial. Maty'~or Pro Tam Riddl.espargor stated that commerical businesses were A c lespergeryal also stated reas to need ee the Parka master plan. Council Member Alford asked when the plan would be completed. Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation, responded that the plan was one to two months away from Parks Board approval and would then be submitted to the Council. Council Member Hopkins stated that the Parks Board should bring to account thetlossoof moneyofromethe taxprollsoandhtheaexcessive time to maintain. Hopkins also stated that he b.ulteved some type of planned development on the property would be better. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that 20 feet would be kept for the park and disposition approved for the remainder. Council Member Stephens stated that lthe disposition had been pending for some Lima and asked why the sudden interest by the Parks Board. 0 McAdams responded that the items had Juat been referred to the Board. Council Member Barton asked if the Parks Board should be involved in zoning cases. Council Member Hopkins replied if believed they should if it was pertinent to coat. Hopkins also stated that the Council had approved a similar planned development previously. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that there Was no great urgency and felt the Council should allow the Parks Board to complete their master plan and see what could be done with City owned property. Council Member Hopkins stated that it was a worthwhile idea but it would coat mouey and the Parks and Recreation Department was already stretched thin. Council Member Stephens stated that a 20 foot strip could be kept for the park and the remainder could be sold, Riddlesperger motion, Barton second to table the disposition for two months to allow the Parks Board to comp lets rihe master pplea. Alford, Riddlesperger, Barton, and Mayor 8tsweet lays". stop and, Chew and Hopkins "nay'. Motion to table passed 4 to 3. b. The Council considered approval of disposition of excess Carroll Boulevard right of way at the southeast corner of West Prairie and Carroll Boulevard, (D-35) Riddlesparger motion, Alford second to table the disposition for two months to allow the Parka Board to complete the master plan. Alford, Riddlospergaro Barton, and Mayor Stewart "a ell, Stephens, Chew and Hopkins nay . Motion to table passed 4 to 3. M City Counoil Minutos Meeting of Novombor 11 1983 Pago Seven 7. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing to oonslder annoxation of approximately 35.66 sores of land located along the south side of Hickory Crook Road bogtnning at FM 21811 (4.1609) The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in Inver of the petitlon. Mr. Gordon Meredith, property owner, spoke in opposition stating that he had spoken at the last public hearing and whoever wanted this annexation had not presented anything publicly, Mr. Meredith also stated that he had done studies on the legal procedures for annexation and that the City had done erything correctly. He felt that the annexation would be In the bveest interest of the present citizens of Denton but did not see any advantage to those would lived in the proposed annexation area.. Council Member cliew asked Mr. Meredith it he was currently within the City limits. Mr. Meredith responded yes. Fir. Bill Burg spoke in opposition asked what would be the plans for the area. Mr. Richard Flournoy, owner of 17 acres off of Hickory Creek Road, stated that he had originally wanted to sell the property which he had obtained as an investment. A contract had been made with Mr. Peter Murphy for the land. When he became aware of Mr. Murphy's Intended to land use, Mr. Fournoy had cancelled the contract of sale and had notified the Planning and Zoning Commission to withdraw the plat. Mr. Gary Mandeville spoke in opposition stated that he saw no benefit to himself. He had owned property and lived in the area for 10 years. Mr Manderblll also stated that Teasley Lane was over crowded and the police could not offer protection. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that a proposed 32 lot devote Mont was the purpose of this annexation. This development would have high density, and be serviced by septic system and well water. Throughout the prooesa, Mr. Murphy had been deciding on whether or not to proceed with the development. He had now withdrawn his plat approval request from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any future development In the area would require plat approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Hopkins motion, Barton second to disoontieue annexation proceedings. Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council held a public hearsr~g to consider annexation of approximately 1014.4 acres of land located south of Highway 380 and west of Interstate 35. (Z-1610) The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor of the petition. No one spoke In opposition to the petition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that 7 reply forms had been mailed with 0 returned in favor and 3 returned in opposition. The area was considered for annexation because of its planned major City Council Minutes Meutin of Novamber 1, 1963 pago fjght employment potential. The City had a major investment in the infrastruoture of this area due to the Hlokary Creek sewer line. The area included the Selwyn School and twelve residences and was served by three modes of transportation (the Denton Munioipal Airport, rail service and interstate 3$), Watkins also reported in response to an inqquiry by Plr. Bradford, an area resident, that his cost to tap into the sewer line would be $7,000 whether the area was annexed or not 0. The Counoil hh l~ a publia hearing to consider Annexation of approximately k~, acres of land located west of the interstate 3$ W service road and south of the existing city limit, (4.1611) The mayor opened the public hearing, Mr. 4. A, Nelson, representing James Mason, spoke In favor of the annexation stating that Mr. Mason would like for the City to annex an additional 50 acre parcel. The purpose of the annexation was to have potential urbanization area in the City limits so the city could control development, All of this area was urban in character and would eventually be used as light industrial preparty4 Annexation now would save time in the future as the owner would not have to petition for annexation and zoning when the property was ready to be developed, Mr. Nelson also stated that if the additional 50 Aare parcel were annexed, it would join with the light industrial property to the north and the City could then Approach the State Highway Deppartment regarding improvements, maintenanoo, and extension of the IH-35 frontage road. Mayor Stewart commented that additional acreage could not be added once the annexation proceedings had begun, No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing. Charlie WAtkina, Senior Planner, reported that 5 reply forma had been mailed with v returned. Mayor Stewart asked if the staff was proasading to annex the additional 50 ,arts. Watkins aponded -ka. D. The Council hold a public hearing to consider an+ixatiun of approximately 3F7 acre, of land Iodated between I-35 W and the Santa Fe Railroad. (4.161)) The Mayor opened the public heeeing, No one spoke in favor of the petition, Ms, Sue Wilson, area roident, spoka in opposition stating that she owned less than 2 Acores on Bonnit. Brae and had all of the water, sewer and lights she needed. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlospergor asked what were her utility arrangements. Ms. Wilson responded that TP&L furnished electricity, she had well water and septic, system for sawerago and did not need any more taxes. Mr. L. A, Nelson, representing Robert W, Jones, spoke in opposition stating that his client owned 70 to 80 tracts in the proposed annexation parcel. This property had been in the Jones family in excess of 50 years. The property extended to Bonnie Brae with a 250 feet strip of access. This tract would not be subject to development in the near future, The balance of the property was rural in nature and was being used As a cattle operation. Mr. Jones Mcity eotlnogvofiNovember s1, 1981 Page Nine had spent significant sums of money on corrals, feeder pens and chutes. No utilities were available to the subJaot Ceder, In the ruralenowiAndaMr, Jonas wouldrlikeito haveathis paroeladeletedufrom the annexation proceedings. Mayor Pro Tam Riddlesperger asked if annexation would complicate the raising of cattle. Mr. Nelson responded that Mr. Jones would have a problem with all City ordinances and especially the animal control ordinance. Mr, Charles Dansby spoke in opposition stating that he lived across from the Jones property and was told that It would be 10 years before he could receive City sewerage. Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked If Mr. Dansby would be required to tie on to City sewerage, City Manager Hartung responded no, The Mayor closed the public haaring. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that 20 revly forms had been mailed with 1 returned In favor and 7 returned in opposition. whichn was pointsd to acreh tractors Approximatelys30 peopleo llvep to ethe area which is in the major thoroughfare pplan for the City, In Waticinaereportedtthat thecSolareWayiieaddition was sol ppd bout Andrthat the addition would be brought into the City as a non-conforming use, The developers would be required to complete the addition under the same conditions as they started, Jones's operation reported being that t conflict Nelson with wad rigmardi the coirec control WatkinsCesuggestedrdthat0eitrmightCebethbetterplto oameodathA animal control ordinance than to remove the Jones peroal from the annexation. Mayor Stewart stated the Mr. Jones's stockyard operation could be zoned commercial. annexation of approximately 11held a 25 acres poflland h ocat d on both consider sides of Mayhill Road north of Interstate 35. (Z-1613 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor of the petition, had recentlyypurchasedeacreaga inothisnarea ototraisethotoestand did not want to be annexed. Mr. Mason Haggard, lI spoke in opposition stating that the City Council had shown to the residents that this annexation was Inevitable but the only gain to rho residents would be garbage service. Mr. Hammett of the Police Association had spoken stating that the City of Denton Police were trying to patrol the existing City boundaries. The Council should annex the mobile home parkks and leave the other people alone, The area had adequate electricity, water, sewerage and police and fire services, Mr. Bob Coonrod spoke in opposition stating that he would like for the Council to reconsider the annexation and not take this property, The residents did not need anything the City of Denton had and the City of Denton did not want avthing the residents had. City Council Minutes Meeting of November 1, 1983 Page Ten The City was asking the residents to be annexed and to pay for services before they would $oq the services, Mr. Coonrod also stated that it would be years before this area would be developed, Me, Fay Winchell, President of the Denton Police Association, spoke in opposition stating that the association did not foal that they had adequate manpower to cover any of the are a$ proposed for annexation, There would be increased areas to receive services but no additional officers, Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked if what was really being said was that more money was needed in the Police budget. More money would hire more officers, Ma, Winchell stated that she could not see the connection, The Police could not serve the community with the personnel that they had, The Police Association was proposing that no new areas be annexed, Council Member Hop bns stated that annexations were ppolioy matters and not attuned to the Polica Department, The Poltas Department should be figuring out how work within their present staffing level, Ms, Winchell stated that she was representing the Denton Police Association and not the City of Denton Police Department, Ms, Maxine Carlson spoke in u poaition stating that she had made a conscious decision to live outside of the City limits when she had purchased her property and did not want the area eo be annexed, Me, Rod Cunningham stated that he had been a homeowner in the area For 12 years and had the services he needed, Mr. Cunningham also stated that he knew the area would be in the City in the future, Mrs, Mason Haggard presented a petition signed by homeowners in the area, Mrs. Haggard stated that at the first public hearing on this annexation which was held on October 18 it had been stated that residents could not discharge flvearws in the City limits. Mrs, Fla Bard felt that this would be necessary because of coyetea and wolves and rabbits who eat seedlings, Ms, Eilene Powell spoke in opposition stating that the annexation would hurt residents who held large soreaSe, Ma. Powell also stated that according to the service plan which was given to her the residents would have police proteot:lon and they already had that, They would receive regular refuse collection and that now was being contracted to He. Fred Hill, Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that a service plan was required by law to be furnished for each annexation, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Charlie Watkina, Senior Planner, reported that 48 reply forma had been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 18 returned in opposition. The staff felt that there was an urgency to look at areas for annexation when curtain eondit ion warranted, This particular area was important due to the location of the Hickory Creek sewer line and was the target area for two proposed mobile home parks. Another annexation was pending on East McKinney as a result of a mobile home park addition, Swisher Road had a mobile home park proposal and another north of Page Road, The staff had received notice of a 300 acre plan from Henry S. Miller for an industrial and multi-family development. If the area were not annexed, there would be more mobile home parks proposed. City Counall Minutes Meeting of November 1, 1983 Page Eleven In answer to inquiries, Watkin stated that water and sewer are provided but the City does not extend the lines whether in e city Department hind Animal Controlg would be handle taken by skunks, Soll bits sand snakes. Barton motion to stop the annexation and reconsider the size of the area to be taken in. Motion died for lack of a second. Mayor Stewart stated that the parcel could be reduced prior to final annexation, 84 Ordinances A, The COunoII considered adoption of an ordinance establishing new user foe rates In the areas of building f es, weed Cutting Library, Parks and Recreation, Public Works, barricade inspections, fire inspections, ambulance service, platting and zoning fees, sfgn permits, Animal Control, and Police aervicea in the City of Denton. City Manager Hartung stated that no additional information was available. Stephens motion, Hopkins second to table the ordinance and continue the discussion on the various fees. Motion to table passed unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for Public Hearing" concerning the proposed annexation of approximately 175 acres of land beginning at a point in the present City limits lying 350 feet north of and perpendicular to the centarline of U. S. Highway 380 and approximately 3600 feet east of the termination of the Denton city limit on U. S, Highway 380 east. Chrtrlia Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that the staff was recommending the first public hearing be held on December 6, th second public hearing be held on December 20 and a special oallea meeting on January 10 to institute annexation proceedings. The following ordinance was preaentedi NO. 83-124 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, 1 Chew motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote Barton "aye" Hopkins Stephens "aye", ~Alelyd Rlddlesperger "ayaChew "aye , and Mayor Stewart aye , Motion carried unanimously, 9. Resolutions A, The council oonsidered a resolution of formal approval of the city of Denton industrial/commercial pretreatment program, Bob Nelson Director of Utilltiea, reported that the staff had been working for quite sometime on this Industrial/oommeroial pratreatment program, Before the Environmental Protection Agency would give final approval they desired to have a formal resolution from the Council, Howard Martin, City Chamist reported that the 1978 provisions of the Clean Water Act called for control of pollutants Into the environment. The objectives ware to prevent pollutants into the City Council Minutes Meeting of November 1, 1983 Page Twelve waste water through pretreatment, to prevent pollutants which would be untreated and to prevent pollutants In the sludge. As of July, 1983 all requirements had been met and final approval by the EPA woe contingent upon the passage of the resolution. The following resolution was presented) R E$ 0 I. U T I 0 N WHEREAS the Denton City Council, on May 4, 198 , %tsd Ordinanoe No. 81.3 setting forth uniform requirements or got and indirect oontributors into the wastewater collection and treatment system of the City of Denton; and WHEREAS, this Council is responsible for CChe implementation and operation of the Denton Industrial/Commercoak Pratreatment Program and assurin that this program has adequate funding to effectively accomplish the program objectivasi and WHEREAS, this Council desires to evidence the fact that the Council endorses the Denton Industrial/Cammarioal Pretreatment prograr,; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ()F THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASt EC ION i. at the enton Industrial/Commercial Pretreatment Program herein and above referred to, is hereby approved. PASSED AND APPROVED this lot day of November, 1983. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS OR ATTESTI CITY OF DENTON,~TEXAS APPP.JVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY1 Hog king motion, Stephens saoond to apQrove the resolution. On roll call Barton "aya"HoRkino "aye', gtsphens "aye", Alford aye, Riddlesperger daye , Chew "aye', and Mayor Stewart "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Hopkins stated that the City of Denton wastewater treatment plant was second to none in the United states. City Manager Hartung stated that he would like to publicly congratulate Howard Martin and his staff for their very fine work. 10. The Council considered approval of a wastewater services agreement with Ben Pinnall and Buddy King. Bob Nalson, Director of Utilities, stated that this was development on FN 2181 approximately 1 1/2 miles want of IH-35 and 2 1/2 miles east of the Hickory Creek lift atation. The developers had asked for sewer service as an alternative to City Counoil Minutes Meeting of November 1, 1983 Page Thirteen Installation of a paukage plant. The charge rate would be 150% of the commercial rate. The developer would build and maintain a lift station to the City limit line and would be responsible for the commercial pretreatment. The details of the agreement had been worked out with the developer. Council Member Hopkins asked what the development plans were. Nelson responded this would be a single family housing development of approximately 300 to 400 homes on 60 mores. Council Member Hopkins asked where the intake for the City water was located in relation to the proposed development. Nelson responded the intake was south of the property. Counoll Member Hopking stated that in keeping with the environmental situation, the City did not want raw sewerage discharged near the intake. Mayor Stewart stated that the possibility of raw sewersga discharged near the City intake had been a concern of his but he felt that the city could not be over extended trying to serve developments in the extra territorial Jurisdiction. Mayor Pro Tem Hiddleaperger asked how far this development was from our sewer line. Nelson replied about 2 1/2 to 3 miles. Mayor Stewart asked if one lift station would be adequate. Nelson responded that the developer would ocnstruct the lift station. Mr. Buddy King stated that he had no comments to add. He had met with the staff 10 or 12 times and felt that this solution might be the answer to areas outside of the City limits. Council Member Stephens asked when the line was extended from the davalopment to the Hickory Creek sewer line and paid for, would the City have to maintain the line. Nelson answered the City would maintain only the area in the City limit and the extra territorial Jurisdiction. Council Member Stephens asked if the annexation which were pending were finalized, would the City limit line be moved any closer to this development. Nelson replied no. Mayor Steuart stated that he thought the Council should begin looking at these types of issues. It should be considered what would occur if the City had a number of these requests and the impact that would have on future expansion. Stephens motion, Hopkins second to approve the wastewater servioee agreement with Ben Pinnall and Buddy King. Motion carried unanimously. ll. The Council received a report on 200 Daniel Street drainage. Assistant City Manager Svehla reported that the staff had been working for 2 weeks on this issue. Mr. Walters property at 200 Daniel Street had 9 flat spot on it which hampered drainage. The staff had recommended to Mr. Walters that he authorize the Street Department to make improvements on his property. Mr. Walters had baeq approaohad regarding giving an easement to the City and the staff was staking an additional easement on the Landrip property. City Council Minutes Meeting of November 1, 1983 Page Fourteen When the thesa easements were obtained, the Cityve full easement from Daniel Street to Highway 380, IrawouldCitythewnou dhabe taking equipment onto Mr. Daniel's property to older the dra~cage ditch providing there was no rain, Council Member Stephens asked how the staff would handle the problem of fences on uhe property, Svehla responded that the fences would be taken down during the work and replace at the oompldtion of the project, Council Member Hopkins asked where the water went when it drained, Svehla responded that the water drained across Highway 377 into th( Center Point mobile home park, Mr, Walters stated that when the water hits his property It goes out thenhdowna Co lthedCen erpoints Mobile RNomeb Parki,ntoMr heWaltsrs lalso stated that the drainage ditch was not wide enough. 12. The Council considered approval of the name Briarcliff for a new City park, Assistant City Manager McKean reported that the staff was asking for official approval to name the new park in the MayhIII area Brisrollf4, Council Member Hopkins asked if the name was spelled Briarcliff or Briarcliff, McKean responded that in meetings with the neighbors and the Denton State School the staff had been informed that the correct spelling was Briarcliff, Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the name of Briarcliff for the new City park, Motion carried unanimously. 13, the Counoll held a discussion of designating one-way fronr.;y;a roads on IH-35 from U. S, 77 north to the City limit line. Assistant City Manager Svehla reported that the staff had presented a recommendation from the Citizens Traffic Safety Support C ission preSio771northtandCfromiHighway d388 to the U. frontage roads mm Mr, Dwight Bird from the Highway Department had appeared before the Council to discuss this ssua and to give additional information, The Highway th afrontagearoads tfrom dIH city 77onorth reconsider line one-way. the dCitynlimit Mr, Dwight Bird stated that the state had originated the request for the ordinance designating the one-way frontage raoda in order to finalize plans for a major reconstruction of IH-35. The plans could not be finalized until the status of the frontage roads was determined as it would make a difference in the engineering design designated the frontagee rods cities as along a rIf other City n J Denton chose not to do this the reconstruction project would stop at the northern City limits tine. Council Member Stephens asked what would be the date the one-way condition would become effective, Bird replied all of the frontage roads would become one-way simultaneously at the completion of the project. Council Member Stephens asked if the ordinance was approved, when would the one-way signs be installed, r Mautingcouncil Vovembers1, 1983 pugs Fifteen Bltd would beP on e mpletdaandi theosign$ installed, years before the project Mayor Stewart stated that if the Counoll did not want to designate the frontage roads as one-way at this time, could the ordinanoe be approved at a later date, Bird responded that the plans for the reconstruotion had to be completed before the contracts were let, roadsi w uld abeam o e~ way stated and his concern i U, S. 77 h north frontage d two-way between Highway 380 and U, S, 77, if an aooldent occurred, the state would immediately make all of the frontage roads one way, City Attorney Taylor stated that if the Highway Department decided It was necessarv, It was his judgement that they oould make all of the frontage roads one-way without approval by the City, Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespargor stated that the city had nothing to lose by cooperating with the Highway Department In this matter, City Manager Hartung replied that the City would gained 3 miles of new highway, Mayor Pro Tex Riddlesperger asked about the frontage roads from Highway 380 north to V, S, 77, bird replied that the Highway Department was not working on that r particular section at this time, Mr, Jerry McCloud stated that when he purchased his home in the wasGroo0wa roadso wouldKeall eventually ebecome one-way and was concerned about access into and out of the neighborhood t~r, McCloud was referred to Mr. Bird of the Highway Department for urther clarification on the project, drains a The Council considered approval of a Chaega Order for g e for the sell-Coronado system. Assistant City Manager Svahla reported that the Council had approved a bid 3 mo th earlier which was a combined bid for drainOriginallytsoparatalbidsrwereotakand en onethe Cital Bell-Cormonado project PIT the bids received were very high, The project was rebid as a combined bid with the CIP. In the haste to prepare the information and make the necessary changes, one line of type was omitted from ohangeborderoin the amount of $19,558 OOito correctnthis omisspiron. a Riddlosperger motion, Alford second to approve the change order. Motion carried unanimously, 15. The Council considered approval of casting voting entitlement In the election for Board of Directors for the Denton County Appraisal District. City Manager Hartung reported that the City of Denton had a voting antitlement of 552 votes which could be cast In the election for the Denton County Appraisal Diatrict Board of Directors. The follovinp, resolution was presentadi AT A F DEN TFJW RHELD INMTHEIMUN CIPALE BUNCITY O COUNCIL OF SAID CITY ONCTHE 01ST DAYOOF NOVEMBER, A.D. 1983. City Council Minutes Maeting of November it 1989 Page Sixteen g E S 0 b U T 1 O N WHEREAS, pursuant to the pprovisicns of Senate Bill 621 countyngintothe estate tofn Texas, sth0 Appraisal for each Denton, Texas nominated Raymond Pitts by a Resolution dated Oorober 4, 1983, to fill a position 0n the Board of Directors to the county-wide appraisal district] and pp@ Texas Is W nEtit end ito castbaeritotal rof n552 tvotesthfor0 the ofandtdatea nominated to serve on said Board of Direotorst NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTbN, TEXASt =10-1 I That the City of Denton, Texas, hereby oasts its voting entitlement as ollowsl All 552 votes to Raymond Pitts, SECTION 13. after its passages Andaappuroval by the effective C unnciimmediately the City from sod Denton, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1st day of November, A,D, 1989, KT.(;KAIW U. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTt DUN CITY OF DEN CON,'TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt G. Jo TAYLOR, CITY ATTORNEY Stephens motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved, On cal "aye", Riddle pergern"ayya®'e'Chowki'paye',yeandSMayor sSte a®rt Bayard Motion carried unanimoualy. 16, The Council held a disoussion of open container laws, pur on un the agenda was toatgathert Input andAeinform lilontion hes open container laws in Texas and for Denton. Cityy Attorne Ord i nanaa wou yldTaylorteCsta rephatortednothate thalooe pholroa natainer iposbeevderopen ccoontiners opn g could be inside of a vehicle within reach of the adreiver or any passenger, Alcoholic beverages could be transported in a vehic leo as have Co bietransported inrthe tru knout of ythe ®reach oof5tatherdr ver or any passenger, Council Member Hopkins stated that there was not a state ordinance governing open containers. City Council Minutes Meeting of November 1, 1981 Page Seventeen Council Member Barton stated that he believed the ordinance would be unconstitutional, Mr, Larry Bailey, insurance agent, spoke urging the Council to consider the passage of an open container ordinance, City Attorney Taylor stated that an ordinance of this nature would be extremely difficult to enforce as you could not stop a motorist Just to inspect for open alcoholic beversge containers, if a person were stopped for suspected driving while intoxicated and an open container was found in their possession, they could than be cited for violation of the opan container ordinaoe, 17, Now Business The following items of new business were requestedi Council Member Chew asked to have on open container ordinance prepared for the Council meeting of November 0, Mayor Stewart asked to receive a report of the effect of now developments on the wastewater treatment plant capacity at the November 1$ meeting, The Council then convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. No official action was taken, With no further business the meeting was adjourned, 10860 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING; December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent Agenda SUBJECT; Bid # 9206 Streetlights =01ARYi This bid is for the purchaso of streetlights for use by the Electric Distribution department in the new con- struction and maintenance of the streetlighting system. These streetlights are replacements for Warehouse stock and the quantity is approximately a 3-4 month supply, ACTION REQUIREDI Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE Or F'UNDS1 This purchase will be funded from Warehouse inventory st,".k account number 710-0040598-8708 and re-charged to, the applicable work order as they are placed in service. RECOKXENUATION+ We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification as followst Item lit to Temple, Inc, at ,",5,00 ea. total $ 4,500.00 Item 02 to Temple, Inc, at $45.00 ea. total $ 91000.00 , Item #3 to Cummins Supply at $52.94 ea, total $ 2,647.00 Item #4 to Kriz-Davis at $81.68 ea, total $24,504.00 Item #5 to Temple, Inc, at $14,50 ea, total $ 5,075,00 Bid Total amount $45,726,00 EYHIBITSi Tabulation ~heet, SUBMITTED BY Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M, Assistant Purchasing Agent y, pW r ~ I ~ ~T ~ Mai M O O p O p , 4k 07 ^ £ M n I n n • G H `J f+ W h m ry N I ~ H fJ n 1 Q 1 h „ Y ~ r'Ti I r+ ,py pn d ~ T' b O O ~ IM ry O Q Vi T. E C E W a 4^ O W ~ ff W W W th l7 1~ 1-+ N V U p X M Ln C O p A 9 ryb tl v 00 lh , w ry 1 P Y• co W ul a c n E ° . c ti tl ~ N lt} ro (Yq ?0 n t w p In v C fo n %E h 0 b lA V ~ b ° o o° ~y nro x ` N V r p ;5' V P VI lh g n > rA O I O LA r L7 tl A 14 O E r ,e P n N t ?d H ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACX-UP SL^ WY SHEET DATE OF MUTINGr December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM it Consent Agenda SUBJECT Bid 0 9207 Word Processing Unit S Terminal Controller SIR MARYI This bid is for i.he tease/purchase of one word processing unit, two work stations and one printer for use at the Service Center Complex, items number 1, 2, and 3, This bid was sent to several vendors and received only one bid, We did however, receive letters from five of these vendors stating that they were not bidding on at this time, but to retain their name on the bidder list. We also received a bid on a remote terminal, item 04, to be used at the Municipal Building, SOURCE OF FUNDSi Budget year 1983-84, RECOMMENDATTONt We recommend this bid be awarded to I.B.M. as shown on the tabulation sheet for the lease/purchase and maintenance for the total monthly cost of $789,40 per month on a 60 month terml plus installation and transporation cost (one time) of $245,00, EXHIBITSi Tabulati n sheet, SUBMITTED BYE /'f h J, Marshall, C.P.M. v Purchasing Agent I `r I I I ~ ~ + I 'J IJ I I~ ft (~'~~7~r.1h d Ni 73 '*3 ~ £ VY M ~ N H ry C~ W ~ AM, ~y A ~ ~ pHp r 00 A d h A N ~0 n r O n ~ n z rG rl N N li r a i r r ra 11 N V v^ M CCC H b+ ~n V W o ~ H ~c v, ~ V m y ~ l~ ~~Tpp W t" O co O b Q v H IJ ry ~ 1?+ H " o o ° o a ~ A n N0 tJ W m p~ N O W 60 O O O O O O 6 N k4 A Hi C> c t'. w b W ,0'' ~ gh 0 O A d r W $ k4 n VV tY fD c CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMARY MET DATE OF ,MEETING. December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA rrpsl Ji Consent agenda SUBJECT; Bid 0 9209 Ridgeway Drive paving & Drainage SUL01ARY1 This bid is for the construction paving and Drainage of Ridguwcy Drive, Wo sent this bid to our vandors re- sponding to recent bids plus others requesting to be included on this bid list. We received four replies as shown on the tabulation sheet, together with their re- spective 5% bid bonds, ACTION REQUIRM Approval by council, k. ALTERNATIVES; Delay awarding, Reject bids end/or rebid, RECOh6MENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting specification and bid requirements of Jagoe Public for the total contract price of $427,230,26, EKHIBITSI Tabulation sheet, SUBMITTED BY: CLvLGtl /4ting , arshall, C.P,N, PurAgent a v J O ~ w J ~ W w N J Nb ty A N I N G < rt rm p w e c+ m v a~ PO r. O 00 H I ~ N 1 r M a ~ 7• n b 8 V W e7 0 V x, n H M 4 C n PO PO W ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUEUTARY SHEET DATE OF NEETINCi December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent Agenda SUBJECTi Bid # 9210 Tree Trimming SUNMARYi This bid is for the trimming of trees and clearing of electric lines in the City of Denton, The contract will be uvder the supervision of Cho Electric Distri- bution Department, ACTION REQU1REDt Approval by Council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDSi 1983-84 Fiscal budget funds account 610-008-0252-8336-E355 Electric Distribution overhead distribution system maintenance, RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification of Horton Tree Service at ,50 per square foot open easement trimming (from a bucket truck)l ,90 per foot closed easement trimming (hand climbing) and ,70 per foot for the combination areas, EXHIBITSi ` bulatiop heet, SUBMITTED BY s - • w`~ Tom. D. Shaw, tp-, Assistant Purchasing Agent f f f W f h 44 4Ion` ~ ~ a H ~ H P ~ m 4 O a m ~ ~ w h M N ft~ rt ~ M V Hi K y I n pp d a M ~ O z z cr mK K ~ m M I rgNfW W ~ CO 70 ry o 1 8 CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA BACK-SUP SLWIARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM d Consent Agenda SUBJECT; Bid # 9211 Water Treatment Chemicals SUMMARYt This is our annual bid for chemicals for the treatment of raw water, waste water and steam turbine water. We ask for bids firm for one year, FOB Denton, but some- times must consider prices subject to change and FOB shipping point, Wo received bids from ten vendors, Most were FOB Denton and most were firm. I will then recommend the lowest and best price firm for one year and FOB Denton, ACTION REQUIREDi Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNDS1 Fiscal budget year 198384, REC0[MENDATION i We. recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest and best bid FOB Denton and firm for one year when possible as followst Item #1& 2 Dixie Petro Chem 0 286.40/T & 59,60/ cwt, Item 113 Thompson Hayward @ 19,40/cwt, Item 114 & 5 McKesson chemical @ 69.90/T & 64,42/cwt, Item #6 Stauffer Chemical 0 129,80/T Item 07 McKesson Chemical @ 171.80/T The totals of this cannot be determined at this time however, with the estimated totals of product to be used the totals are as followsi Item 111 $28,640,00 Item 112 $170880,00 Item 113 $ 5,820,00 Item #4 $10,485,00 Item 115 $10,323.20 Item #6 $45,430,00 Item #7 $37,796,00 Grand Total . , , , , , , , , , , $156,374.20 EXHIBITS1 Tabulation shoat. SUBMITTED BY i John J, Marshall, C.P,M, Purchasing Agent I I I~ I I~ i N f ~ M M1 ~p "1 'y Yl r w H 1 ~ ~ N N n y N ~ Y 0 ryh pp'^ yp~, y, y~ ,~p' p pn Q t L 6 `t ~f ~ R b w R ~ ~ w ^ Y N 4 Y n y ~j A V " C e~s I~ ~ ~ ~ S ffi cas J ff I ~ N R M N Y 4 ~ v p p ee yN. p. QQQn 0 8 y O ~ ~ C o ~ p Q n ~I 8 ~ g g g J Y } O O M N M d ~ V! ,$Q rq N Y C A V Y ~ T ~ r M ~ l g n s ~ :.R .111 l1l l1i , CITY COUNCIL ACENDA BACK-UP SVM!,tARY SHEET DATE OF MEETINCt December 6, 1983 COUNCIL ACRNDA ITEM 11 Consent Aflenda SUBJECT; Purchase Order 1160419 to Dickerson Construction 5UF1,IARY r This purchase order to Dickerson Construction Company in the amount of $3,750,00 is for an emergency 15" bore under Highway 377, A high pressure water line had broken under the highway and a new line had to be in- stalled before damage to the road surface occurred, ACTION REQUIREDt Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNDSt 1983-84 Fiscal budget water distribution system maintenance, RECOHME:NDATIONt We recommend this purchase order be approved and the invoice be processed. EXHIBITst urehase der number 60419, SUBMITTED BY: Tom U. Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent CITY p e , Wnn4y PUACHA$lNG DEPT, 21108',8 MoKlnnev PURCNASI ORDQR NUMBIR 60419 'Oanlon, Texas )6201 81718Qa8311 0/FW Metro 2670042 CAta 10/14/83 uo No. vsNOOa No. . rstua Net WA No. oalvuY Rwsh Accr, No,6~0.OgB«04b1»8303 Dickerson Construction Co, fNN P.O, Box !81 Celina' TX 75099 Tot CITY OF OBNTON Water 4 Surer Field Serwiz" As directed SHOW P,O, NO. ON ALL SHIPMENTS, OK4IVKRY TtCKCTS. INV 0 ICES ETC., $11 NO INV 0WKS TO ACCOUNT$ PAYA8411, THK CITY F p IS EXEMPT FROM SAL$S TAX AS PER HOUSN 1114E *20. YHE CITY Op OKNTON IS PROHIBITKO FROM PAYING FOR MERCHANDISE 11KFORE IT IS1 RECEIVED. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST ee F,OS„ CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS. 0 KNTON, 7riXAS 7"'!,r1,1CK UMEKq~r DESCRIPTION QUAN.(UNIT PRICK AMOUNT mdar highaagl1377 at t4ae eeq Street 501 nd inat4&U 15 casing 873,00 $3e750.00 C\!\r-. •nil}'\./l~ 'uf~I/1. OCT 1915113 Olreet All Inquirles TO; CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT. John J, Marshall, C,P.M., PUrchasing Agent Tom 0, Shaw, C,P.M., Asst Purchasing Agent 1 al 41 / 1 CIT't COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETINGI December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent Agenda SUBJECTi Purchase Order #60760 to EMCO =11MARY; This purchase order is for the emergency repair of our equipment number 2030, Solid Waste Truck as shown on invoice numbers 17103 and 17102 for $6,761,21, This repair was on the truck body, ACTION REQUIREDi Approval by council, SOURCE: OF F'UNDS1 Fiscal year budget, RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend these invoices bur the emergency repair of our equipment be approved for payment. EXHIBITSi Purchase order number 60760 and invoice number 17102 and 17103. SUBMITTED BYi ~-3 m Ufa shall, G.P.M. Purchasing Agent f I I ' i j f K ~ ~ y~ K y r rl j e CL s V X: v Y! > y s a; c o I \ \ G .y k ~ C' fi k V IiI o. a I c ~I~ iY rr. G C j ~ ' n r Y LJ s '=1I I r V 1••• ♦r~ r- r♦ rV r F•f r f~ yI r l 1 rr. ^rll n' IYj hl ^M ~ 'y' ` ~ h y g p n I IJ ~ ~ ~1 r cc \ C 14 21 W Z N G ^ r 'dtT]vGOCOP''IvF'C, 5-0 C O I .Y~ r • 1 ♦ • . ♦ < m g O lalw OvV, N O' V. ~n c•oalacojoor~ c 00_-y* n G O -I c O GI G G OI C G o cL m n~~~ ,..I I A rn yc i ~ ~ w ~ C dJ o .Z y4; I 0 wW; •iI t'W O tom' O N 00 • .,....7~' G G OIG O G ~ D ~V j ~ r•+++ iie`--tll C C OI O U G' U CI C7 N f.a r v v a C Y ."i ~ z z H>~ ti ► I , I = - GI: G o i n r N xi.^ r rI4 G GIC O r~ i G y H r ~ Ifl ~ I 7 w J -a J. r \ ,y \ :~v rK r sr~c I X j C' C n 0 s~ T 3 r' 1'' W ~x ~ n ro T z i < X a ' i tr Y r'. 1. µi ~ Q IM1 x x 1+ A X ✓ w r D I \ M n I ! i fI IL! www~ C'h•\~N w~rVw C ni 9 r b I w rwr~"~.,NN wN •+N l b S li[ b b b A b b Sy 3 ' ~ I ! O I \ ti ~n Nr S W wW N A ~ Z cPm►+wCCw~Iwtn-4 C I i . ' • . . . • . . . f. I I w Z G ~t. .OWNPP+ni CHI 1. vW p r < N Gr-NI .h v v VI J, rll+~ r -a O ,'6I G O C. O G O G G G C Y O M CG,OI~JC:G 6'OOjG. GG ~ m 1n11 j N W • ! ii b L7 CC x;'vtiww~NO NaJ, W' n . i... i• . . I, . 1 A l.~li..-1Cl G O :c 6 m r C r t, ZC., d , G C'. G Gib A OI C' G C „ ir%COiC CC~C C GICC:G K i N R7 z z~? CITY OR OONTON, SINK OPT, 1 219 6, , MoWnney oKlnney 21 PURCHASE QRDfR NUMBIR 60760 Oenlon, Texas 18201 617/968.8911 Dow metro 257,0042 oAn ~a~83 uo Ho Y(HD01 HO• rjom$ W,O. NO. I UIUS'IAY ERLd ACCT 40, SHIP 710-004-0598-8702 ?A3alnvig,,,r, Tex4H` Tos CITY AP OBNTON Vehicle Maitat. 8d4 Taus AeAkoo, Texxa 76201 SHOW P.O, r,q.ON ALL. :i)nnrAENr3. O$LIVQA`r rl Ig ""MPT PROM 3ALES rAX AS P QK$T$, INVOIC$g $T0., 9$NO tNV010$9 TO ACCOUNTS PA YA$l$, iFl$ CITY OF p$NTO N, T$XAg 6A HGUgE $ILL }pU. YH$ CITY OF O$NTON IS PgOH1e ITeU FROM PAYING NOA MEACHANOIg$ 1115 17 19 R$CaIV$U. ALL $HIPM$PI YS MUST OF r'.0.8„ CITY OF oamTON, TEXAS, FQR9 IT$M GIT'r STOCK `IUMBCg OHSCRIPTION OVAN,/UNIT PgIC$ AMOUNT gib 12030 ?feet: & Am assembly Invoice 1117103 lot Invoice 917102 S3>942,19 1GC $ 319.02 i, $6,761,21 Olreot All Inquiries To) CITY OP COENTON, PURCHASING 06PT• l~ John J. Marshall, C,P,M„ Purchasing Agent Tom 0, Shaw, C,P•M„ Asst, Purchasing Agent i CITY COUNCIL A(MMA 6ACK-UP SUMMARY SKEET DATE OF MEETINGi December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent Agenda SUB.IEC'r purchase order #60916 to 8mitn pump company SUMMARYi This purchase order is for the repair and serviae to a turbine Layne pump for the waste water treatment plant, We have an estimated total of no more than $41774,00 and could be less as per the quotation, ACTION REQUIREDI Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNM Fiscal budget year, RECONMENDATIONj Ve recommend this purchase order be approved for the emergency repair of the turbine Layne pump of $4,774,00 of the recent more expensive repairs on pumpa, Smith Pump has had the lowest quotations, EXHIBITSi Copy of purchase order 060916 and quotation from Smith Pump Compnay, SUBMITTED BY1 ~6hn L M shall, C,P,M, //Purchasing Agent CITY OF Ot1NTON, PURCHASINQ OBPT, ?18 I. McKinney P01RCMA31 ORDER NUMBER 60916 Ortnton, Tomits 76201 81718688011 O/FW NUtro 207.0042 440'0~ YE140011 610. gaA}a W.9, N0. OIUWIIY AC Cr. $0. CHIP 620-008-0470-8339 glaith Pump Co. J605 Raider Or, Burst, Texas 76053 Tat CITY OM DINTON Wastewater Treatment 1100 Mayhill Rd, Detstan, Texas 76201 SHOW P•0, CIO. Of? ALL SHIPMENTS, OEL,IVERY TICKETS, INVOIOES ETC„ 38610 INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYASItt, THE CITY 00 OENTON, TgXAS 11 EXEMPT PROM SALES TAX AS PER HOUSE 01 LL. 044, THE CITY OP OENTON IS PROHIEIYED PROM PAYING $OR MOROHAN0139 eEPORE IT IS RECEIVED. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE P.O.Ea CITY OP OONTON, TEXAS. ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER DESCRIPTION GUAN./UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Rebuild service water turbine pump for wastewater treatment ~ plant. 4424,26 i Oubte by Earl P. Barrett 10-3-83. I ~ Approved by Caunoil , Olreot All Inqulrles Tai CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASINQ OPT, ` r John J. Marshall, C,P.M„ PuYchasing Agent Tom 0, Shaw, C,P.M„ Asst, Purohasing Agent 4r,t 6 1, (lX r„ IrI J• tI 1` a , 1. 1 1 p X111', Y ; '1 ± 1, 1 - "N OFF" lli( r~A Kpi~~ , ( ravn A count IIvf SMlYH PUMP COMPANY $ot W 16 04110120, Water and ewap~e PteaW~r watao, row rp10 Howwo, Yom M AO W-""n r Ao rya.-vest no %14W flow >H Itunl, TAM x W Ao 41x- 21114M 3 October 1983 G d r/~ City of Denton 215 East McKinney Avenue Denton, Texas 76201 A'T'TENTION t Mr, Bob Kiser REt Repair of Vertical Turbine Pump At Treatment Plant ' Gentlemen , The fallowing is a breakdown and labor rate on the above referenced pump, as per yo4r request. PUMP REPAIR WITH NEW EOUIPMEM i 1 - Byron Jackson. 3 stage l0MgH Bowl Assembly $2916.00 EST, 1 - 5' x 1" Spider with Cutlass Rubber Bearing 212400 IST 1 Bearing for Stuffing Box and Rework Discharge Head 300.00 EST 1 - 5"'x 6 Bushing for adopting Bowl Assembly to Pipe 36.26 EST. I - Item of 10' x "Stainless 5tael Sh£ting 144.00 BS'I', 1 - Item of 47" x 1" Stainless Steel Headshaft 56400 EST 1 Item of 20 hours shop labor @ $20.00 per hour 400.00 BST. 1 - Item of transportation to and from shop 200.00 EST. 1 - Item of Freight from Byron Jackson to Waco 160400 B$T TOTAL ESTIMATE $4,424,26 NOTE1 %AXIMIUM TOTAL WOULD BE NO MORE Tib% $4,774,00, VeITtruly COyours, MT ~II~H P INC, EPB i ,j w Nov 111983 µ0$CNASING 00 4 ' P , CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE, OF BSETINGi December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Il Consent Agenda SUBJECT,' Purchase Order number 60957 to Pedus Building service, Inc, SU JARYr This purchase order Is for the addition of the new Police Station to the existing bid contract +,'9114 for $51,132,00 per year, This includos all building. Our purchase order number 60957 adding the amount for the new Police station at the same average cost per square foot is $15,357,21 Whoa we substraeted the credit for deleting the old Police Station, that is now being romodeled, of $3,734,50 the net addition for this change order is $11,622,71. We then added an estimate for the one time clean up of the now Police Station at $500,00 making the net total change order on this purchase order $12,122,71, ACTION REQUIREDI Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNDS,' 1981-84 Fiscal budget year, RECOMMENDATIONt We recommend this change order be approved for the net total of $12,122.71 for the remainder of the contract year, EXHIBITSi Purchase Order 60957 and 60281 and letters from Pedus Building Service, SUBMITTED BY i J hn J at,scall, C.P.M. urc asing Agent M, wv CITY OF 08NTON. PURCHASING 08PT, PURCHM4 ORIDIR Numm 64957 , 218 8. MOKInneY s Oentor4!'Tex~r~78241 ~ ~ \ • 81716884111 fS7PW'e tro 287,0042 oltif"~`~ 1 ~ 9 ~ 8 3 uo No. a VI10011 N0, 110*4 WHO. N0. OItIV111Y AW. NO, 100.403,0002-8502 Padua Building service, 1Cno. 5400 gulan Street Ft, Worth, T e x a a 7 61 07 Tot CITY OF DINTON 314g. Maint. 213 40 Mominney Denton, Taxaa 76201 _ SHOW 0,0, NO. ON A64 SHIPMENTS, 09UIVQRY TICKV$, INVOI CE$ ETC„ SEND INV0ICE$ TO ACCOUNT$ PAYAat,g, TH6 CITY OP OKN TON, T11XA1S I$ EXEMPT PROM SAUSS TAX AS PER HOUSE 6144 *10, THB CITY CR OENTON IS PAOHIBITEO PROM AAYINQ POR MEROHANOISE 6EFOAa IT I$ AECEIVEO. AUI. SHIPMENTS MUST U P.04.. CITY OP OENTON. TEXAS, ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER OESCAIPTION QUAN,/VNIT PRIC9 AMOUNT Addition to the contract for the J'anitoral Service for the year 83-84, for the now Police Dept. at 221 41. Elm 1. This is for the period from November 1, 1983 thru Sept. 30, 1984. 11 mo, 1396.0 15,357,12 2. One time clean tip for move in estl $00.00 3. Lees aredit for deletion of old Police Station Win of Municipal Building 11 mo, 339.50 (3,734,50' DU;'pL fi Oa?D~ Council approved Direct All lnduiries To: CITY OF 08NTON, PURCHASING 08PT, John J, Mar$hall, C.P,M„ Purchasing Agent / Tom 0. Shaw, C.P.M.. Asst, Purchasing Agent CITY OF 06NTON, PURCHASIN4 OPT, PURCHASE QRDIR- NUMa#R 60281 216 0. MOKInneY Denton, Texas 76201 8171104411 O/FW Wfo 207,0042 oAn 10-3.~3 elo No 1 ^ VIN60a TIM" W.O, N0. OelIV111Y AGCY. NO. Pedus Building Serviae sN,~ 304-003-0002-9502 9400 Hulen Street Ft, Worth, Takes 76107 Tos CITY OP DINTON Parks 4 Rea, 215 2. 'mdm 47 Denton Texas 76202 SHOW P.O. NOON ALL SHIPMENTS, OELIVERY TICKETS, INVOICES ETO., $END INVOIOEa TO A000UNYS PAYAgLH, THE CITY ON OENTON, TEXAS IS EXEMPT PROM SALCS TAX AS AEA HOVSE BILL 020 THE CITY Op OENYON IS PROH161YE0 FROM PAYINQ FOR MERCHANOISE SEPORE IT 19 AECEIVEO, ALL SHIPMENTS MUST SE N,O,fj„ CITY ON OENYON, rEYAS, ITEM CITY STOCK NUMSER OESQAIPTION QUANJUNIT PRICE AMOUNT Janitorial Servicas 1. Service Center - 902 Taxae Street per mo 976,00 2. Vahiala Maintenance - 04 Texas Street per asc 190.00 3. Municipal Bldg. W 215 E, Mmainne7 per so, 2,780.00 4. Personnel 4 Data PToeesstng - 396 L. McKiun.ey per too 315,00 Totals 12 so, $4,261.0 51,132.00 _ i i Olreot All Inqulrles To: CITY OF 06NTON, PURCHASING ORPT. i Jahn J. Menhall, C,P.M., Purchasing Agent Tom D, $Nw, C,P.M„ Asst, Purchasing Agent PEDUS BUILDING SERVICES, INC. 9760 8iockbank November 10 Sane n; 1983 Dallas Texas 7s220 City of Denton 215 E. McKinnoy +214+360•689e Denton, Texas 76201 Attni John F, Marshall Dear Mr, Marshall; In regards to our meeting October 9, 1983 this will confirm our agreement to reduce our billing for the Municipial Build. ing in the sum of $339,50 per month for the Police Department section. Resppectfullyy; PEAS BUILDING SERVICES, INC, John F, Weekley Division Manager , 1 PEDUS BUILDING SERVICES, I NC, , 9760 8rookbank Suite #1 September 9, 1983 Dallas Texa9 76220 City of Denton 215 f McKinney (2141360.6896 Denton, Texas 76201 Attn: Bob Tickner Dear Mr, Tickner; Pedus thanks you for your existing business and are delighted to add your new police department building to our cleaning for the City of Denton, We will clean the new police department building for the sum of $1,396.11 per month, adding it to your existing account #100.003-0002-8502) P,O, # 57484, Cleaning of the entire building Monday through Friday and the departments that work seven (7) days a week will also be cleaned Saturday and Sunday, For example the Jail, dispatch, squad room, etc. Again, we thank you, Resppectfullyr PENS BUILDING SERVICES, INC John F, Weekley Division Manager CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UT SUMLWY SHEET DATE OF MEPTINGi December 6, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 11 Consent Agenda SUBJEM Purchase Order # 60988 to Craco Construction/ Change Order SUP¢UVtYi This purchase order is for a change order on the original Bid Contract #9150, for Airport Substation Foundation, The original contract was for $20,190,00 and was completed, When the final structure apparatus was to be installed we found that we needed co change some structure foundations to better install the equip- ment, therefore the change order was necessary, ACTION REQUIREN Approval by council, SOURCE OF FUNDSi Special capital account for substation construction, RECOb@ MATIONi We recommend this purchase order and change order be approved for the total amount of $4,000,00 as shoe.ro on the purchase order, MIBITSi Co y of purchase order and original bid recommendations, SUBMITTED M - / 4_~4 - J ha' J, i rshall, C,P,M, 41 urchasing Agent CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETINOi June 7, 1983 COUNCIL AGENDA ITIiM If Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Sid # 9150 Concrete Foundation for Airport Substation SUM1%1ARYi This bid is for the concrete foundation work for the new Airport Substation. The bid includes all materials and labor necessary to complete r,he work in 30 calendar days from receipt of order ACTION REQUIREDt Approval by Council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDSI 1982-83 budget account 611-008-0253-9217-3997, Metering and Substation Equipment, RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Graco Construction Company in the amount of $20,790.00 with all work to be finished on or before thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of order, EXHIBITSt Ls eat. SUBMITTED BY 1 `W t Tom ,)Shawl C, .M, Assistant Purchasing Agent TDSIlc Pt ' CITY ON 09NTON. PURCHASINO OPT. PUkHASI ORDER NIUMBER ' ~ 216 B. MoKin Iiy Renton, Texej 79201 817!686.8011 D/FW Metro 207.0042 osrc 11,13-d3 +Io No. YIM00e No, rim" w.0. NC. O/UYIoT ASCT. HO. ORACO Construction Co. sNM 611-008-0233,9217-5979 Rt. 1, Boa 17 Tioga, Texas 76271 ?*1 CITY OP D6NTON E104t. Motor 4 Sub. 901 Texas Denton, Togas 76201 SHOW P,O„40.ON AL4 SHIPMENTS, OBLIVNRY TICK6T5, INVOICIB3 HYC., SEND INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYABL.6. THB CIYY 00 ORNTON, T4NAS I$ E)(EMPT PROM SALES TAX AS PEA HOUSE 6144 }20. THB CITY OP OeNTON IS PROHIBITED FROM PAYING POA MERCHAN01S6 66POAE IT IS RECEIVED. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE P.O,B„ CITY OP OENTON, TEXAS, ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER OBSCRIPTION OVAN./UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1. Change ordsr No. 1 For dead-end structure foundations airport .substation. Complete fustallation four (4) waits. 4 1000.00 4000.00 Council Appraaed . Ref. 1`0458734, Bid #9150. X19 01root All Inouirlos % CITY OF OENTON, PURCHASING DEPT, John J. Marshall, C.P.M., Purehosing Agent Tom D. Show, C,P.M., Asst. Purehosing Agent