HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983
CITY 01 DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ! TELEPHONE (81
7)566-8200
Office of the City lVanager
MEMORANDUiM
i TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMI C, Chris Hartung
{ DATEt October 3, 1983
1 SUBJECT': USER FEE SURVEY
Attached is a copy of the user foe survey you requested comparing the David M.
Griffith user fee reoommendations for city services to cities In the North 'texas
Region. City staff have also made recommendations where It was felt David M.
Griffith's suggested fee was either too high or too low at this time.
We will be prepared to discuss these reoommendations and plans for Implementation
at the city council 500 work session on October 9, 1983,
I
YChrls Hartung
City Manager
la h
1
F
j
4
1384MMi
l
I
ti
I
I.!
SURVEY RESULTS-45ER CHARGES AND PERMIT FEES
} FINANCE/TAR DI:PARTMINT 9/30/83 DEPARTMENT CURRENT CON3ULTANTS STAFF
UITE PLANO RICIIAROSOIi
FEES RM ROC, ADDISON ARLiNC.'MH DALLAS FT,NORTII OARLAIIII GRAND PRAIRIE IRVING LEUISVILIE MESQ
-
FINANCE
Texl
f Tax Costs, 4,00 0,41 4,00 0 4,00 2.00 4,00 4,00 4100 4100 2,00 4100 4,00 4,00
Postage l
Charge ,60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U
Appraisal
1 Dist, 20009,00 0 0 0 0 U U U 0 0 0 0 0
A tax cortificate foe of $4.00 was established by tile, 68th Legislature gffOW Y0 September I, 1903,
The State, Property Tex Board Inter rots the $400 too to include 811 Costs of the certificate,
Most Abstract companies now furnish stamped envelopes with their certlficato requests.
I
3 `f..A7• S'3 i
i
i
I E
I
.r
f
~sti[vt
I
1
i
13741
i
SIAM HLSULI$-4501 LHAIMLS AND 11UM11I FIAS
f1R2 DEPARTMENT 9/30/83
---lirrlTllN ~
~ i UEPANIMENI GUHNENf CUNSUL1hNrS 51Af1
I ItL$ IItC._ _ IIEL. AUUISUN_AW_INUrON bALLAS FI N1111111 UARMIJ GRAND PRAIRIE 1NV1111i I_EVIIS41LIf hILS+JUIIk r!L1lAU IILLIIAIIUSUII
` rIRE
~ INSpnc, Aa,uU X N/C N/C ~ ,
F1Ye N/C NlC N/( N/C NN/a N/C
I ( Anibulancu ;
/C for
Per privnte hr.ivnte f'rivnte
resident {
` Patloot )0100 nl,uu 70,0( N/C Cont. 5,00 Cont, 50.00 Contrnet 50.00 60,00 50,00 65,0 50,oo ro
1 Cost Her 982 nom-re5,
call 206.19 N/A N/A ]40100 N/A N/A N/A 259, 300,00
? I
Lounly
I
I, Lalblb 280.00
er enl] r
herLdOta 2.20 U 2.20 None None !D Co. N/C 2.20 Nono N/A N/A
Sino 1
Lulus
tuNLrlb. r, 21 3.01 3.09 None Notte N/(; N/C 60,00 290,00 N/A N/A
I
r
1 j f
I
l ~
{
*Et, worth is lroposing a,Fire Inspection foe based on square footage with a $15.00 lnininluln charge
* *Dallas will a proposing a fee structure to the council very soon, is based on high rise structures mainly
at $120,00 per call,
x We are needing to do more study on subject; possible recommendation is based on a square foot rate,
E
I
}
1
a
N
! 9URYRY AF3ULT3--USER CIIAROf13 AND PFNMIT FFh3
LIBRARY 4/30/03
DFPARTMKNT CURRIMT COSULTANT9 STAFF
4 NFF~ RFC. RFC, ADDIGON ARLINGTON DALLAB FT WORTfI UAAI.ANb_ ORAHD fRAIAtF SVING LFW[3VIl,I.F MFi9QUIT6 PL1~N0 RICIIAhD30
f ~ L 8 RY ;RESIDENY r
CARD !
2„00 35.00 huy No Per 2"„00 -0• -0- -0- 25.00 per -0- -0• Per, )tom
i nen-CObnt nON• nerds oharge )tom per yanr, par
i City from No year par no n. ti fCIY
p9Y Dallas eervtoo romlly ty
family on-city
My
resident
oard
i
I Per Card 3.69 and Card 15 I'd Card -0. Books
nly only 2,00 for
Item only Only only items only
e 7100 16mm film
Ron-city 39 , 5,00 for
RASideflt 10,00 equlpmant 1
75 * pro,leotor
15,00 (8 mm or
300 n 16 mm)
35,00
l
i
j f
I
t
fl
i I
I
3 ~
v ~ 1
1
1
it
t
I
- Sri
M
1
SURVEY RESULTS--USER CHARGES AND PERMIT rtCS
PARKS A RECREATION lof5• 9/90183
DENTON' S DA ORIFFIN _
OEPARTNENT CURRENT DENTON'S CONSULTANTS STArr
FEES COSTS REC, REC, 1111111 A11111TON 1A1111 M111T11 1A11ANI 8RAN0. PRAIRIE 111111 1111111111 MESsUITE PEANO RICHARDSON
PARKS 6 REC,
j
Center 1
Staff
Classes
Per
clas
I h
ours $1.3 60.00 16100 600hr N/A 1,80 N/A N/A $2,00 N/A N/A 12-3 $1.3 $2,00
increase 2,05
Center r
Contract
Classes $2.3 40,26 16,00 600hr N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0/A tI/A 52.3 11/A N/A
Increase
Tennis i
Staff
Classes
Per
Student
Hour
Junior
class
8-hours: 16.00 3,81 27,00 18,00 N/A 9.00 N.A 5100 N/A II/A 25,00 N/A
Junior ;
Class
i 16-hrs, 32,00 3,87 64,00 36,00 N/A N/A N/A ti/A N/A N/A N/A NIA 35,10 29,1D
r Adult Eee 24,00 4111 40,00 26,00 N/A 12,00 I/A 25,00 N/A 25,00 N/A N/A N/A NIA =
cj
i VI
4 i1
f !
J
f
j
i
i
Ef11Nl;y KLSUIlft7--ust:s (71AIY1tY3 AND M OUT [''Fly
PAAKS & AECAfATION 2 of 5 9/30/03
UEPAK7SfX[+ GtryiHFNI~ WMIN'9 OWSUUI'IWS WAFF
_ FCN.S CYP5 KiX KFX , AL01[#~IJ AllllIittlCN INIJJ~y FI',Ibkltl 0AP1,AFt0 UKAN71 P _
PAWS & Kw, _ fV11NIC_IRJ[Nd I177tSVll(l Mlq(JUITF f[Mb 0I('JIMtxSyl
Tennie
cbctrack
ClAABea.
Per
Student
Ibur
.tumor
Class
0-hre. 16.00 4.11 4.11
Junior 1
Class
16-hra, 32.00 4.11 4,11
AAults
B'ee 24.00 4.11 4.11
Athletic
' F'eee 1
Per Team 20.00 01,2.5 40.no 30.00 !
Athletic
1 f
Rentals i {
Per
'Iburu, ' ~
y ( [Wreion - 32,90 32,!W 35,00 i
F ~ .
3 f
}
,
s
I ~I
I
I ~ IE
i
I
~J f~
TT~
I
E
r
SUAYEY RESULTS--USER CHARGES AND PERMIT FEES
C PARRS 6 RECREATION 3 of 5 9/30/03
ENN' DEPARTMENT CURRENTS DENTON'S CONSULTANTS STAFF
FEES OSTS REC, AEC, ADDISON ARLIN6T01i DALLAS FT, NORTN GARLAND GRAND PRAIRIE WIND LENISYILLE MESQUITE PLANO AICNARDSON
PARKS 6 REC, i
Athletic
Practice
Per
1172 hrs. j
Fret, 10,00 16,46 15,00 15,00 N/A 5,26 1,60/2hr 5,00/hr 2.001hr 6,00/hr 2.501hr 6,00 Whr N/C
lighted 16,00/2hr w/o ligghts 7,60/hr j
3,00/hr lighted 1
w/lights
f IndIvIdue110,00 20,00 N/A n1c 10,00 1,50 N/C N/C N/C 16,00 N/C 12.16 20,00
I Swimming child
10,00 {
Adult {
Per
Admission 1,07
Per
Child ,75 1,70 1100 1,00 N/A 175 ,7U ,40 1100 175 .25' ,75 1,00 I1UO 1,00
Per
Adult 1,00 2,26 1,34 1,00 1,00 1160 1,00 1,00 1,00 150 ,75 1.00 1,00 1,00
Per Sr,
Adult ,16 1100
I ~ f I
i {
f+ EEt
y
i
J f
ij
s~ }
l
1
V
I
r
i
SURVEY RESULTS-USER CHARGES A110 PERMIT FEES
PARKS 6 AECACATION 4 of 5 9/30/03
DENTON'S DIM, GRIFFIN
OtPARTMENT CURRENT DENTON'S CONSULTANTS STAFF
FEES COSTS AEC, REC, ADDISON ARLIN010N DALLAS FT,WORTII OARLANO GRAND PRAIRIE INVINO LENISVILLE MCS IIITC PLANO RICIIARDSON
PARKS 6 AEC:
Per
Indiv,
pass 25,00 23,00 N/A N/A N/A 15,00 N/A 15,00 N/A 10,00 15,00 P%00 10100
Pnr
FemIly E'
No 60,00 60,00 N/A N/A N/A, 50,00 N/A N/A II/A N/A 50,00 N/A N/A
Playgrounds
I Per 0
j week r
iy program 12,00 600,11 24,00 0 wks, N/A NM Dwkt, N/A N/A 8 Wks, dwks, 6 wk;, P Wks. 9 wks, 12 Wks,
20,00 free free froe free 1100 6,50 (roe
I
fIf
s I
[i
I I ~
I
E
I
i
d
9
t
I
f ,
i
l
i
S
SURVEY RESULrs,.usER CNAROES AND PERMIT FEEs
PARKS 6 RECREATION 5 df 5 4/30/83
i`
DEPARTMENT DCNTEN'5 D,M, ORIFFIN _
CURRENT DENTON'S CONSULTANTS STAFF
FEES costs
_,REC, REC,ADDISON ARIf~ t~OTpH DALLAS pt~NppTN OARLANO GAAHD ARAIRIE IRVIIIO LENISVILI_ (NSyUtTE pLAND AICIIh,RDSON
PARKS b AEC, _ }
p--
Cemeteries
Per i
i Resident 150,00 q~,q0
3 360,00 250,00 !
' Per Non.
Resident 200,00 43,48 400,00 900,00
Par e
Infant 60,00
]5,00 1
For
Concrete
Work MOD
25,00
i
E
~I
1
I
tI
f
1
4
j
i
yi
i
ON
SURVEY RMLIS--USLR I:EIAIIU0 ANU PLNI411 ILLS
PLANNING A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9/30/83
DEPARTMENT CURRENT 'CONSULTANTS STAFF
FEES REC. _ W. ADDISON ARLINGTON DALLAS PT,WORTII OARLAND GRAND PRAIRIE IRVING LENISVILLE 14ES(ZWE PLANO RICHARDSON
PLANNING
AND COMM
DEV,
Plats
Initial
Plat 65.00 660,00 100100* 26.00 100.00 160100 160.00 A O,U0 100.00 60.00 60,00 10.00 00.00 40,00
660.00 +6,00/ 400,00 +1,00 A +3.00 42,00/10 41.00 44,00 +2,00
I acre 2100 +3,00 to 760,00 or
46,00/ac 15,00
i Replat
without
NOW, 110.00 1300.00 160,00" 26.00 100.00 160.00 160.00 0,00 100,00 Sam 100,00 10,00 10,00 Sank
h300,00 + 60,00 {
ins
Reptat
with 160,00"
noti 110.00 130000, 1300,00 26,00 Sam 16U.00 160,00 O,OD 100.00 Sam 100.00 10.00 OO,UO Sane
NOW.
Foe/owhor P.100 23.60 4.00 1.00 1.00 4,00 3,00 0.00 I.OD 3.00 2100 1,00 4.00 2,00
2oniny 3300 00
Changes M)
less than 160.00 260.00 600,00 b 100 00 100,00
j
6 acres 200.00 116.00 776,00 300,00 460,00 660.00 760.00 41,00/a 200.00 2.00.00 I W,OO 76.00 46,00 12b.00
more then 200,00
6 acres 260,00 976,00 1000.00 600.00 460,00 to 100000 100,00 400.00 A 200,00 169.00 A 76,00 Same 126.00
.000,00 + 200,00 46,00/ac 600,00 300.00 42.00
f Spec,
Use Po P," 200.00 776000 776 DO 426.00 100.00 260100 0100 Samo Samo 0100 Sama MOD 16040 I?6,00 }
storic
Lah*Ark4. 25 W 726.00 25,00 0100 0,00 0100 Same 0100 6,OO 0,00 0.00 0,00 20,00 0,00 .
"to s then 3 lots or less than 6 Wes
EEE Staft recomondatlon would generate 125,376 less than consultant's total.
r
1
i I
~ i
t I
i c. Slim t Ill ,III I, UJI It I,khnlll, Will, III IIIJI I I I I a
Police Dept. 9/30/3
.~.--ucyroNls u,lr.-:I{ntrrlu
i.
CUIISUL1,1kIS 51nIF U,UII
ULINIil41l it CUIIkL111 Ill nlw ulldlnIt
lL5 HLC, IILC. nUUlSull ru(I,Illtlull UlnIA iI/ulllllJl (nlllnllll I,Itnlll) Pltlilltll vIUU IIUL41111 01,10111
I'Ul ILL 1 9, (SD
7,50/ 7,00/ 00 111.01} 10 ",.01,1 Nut to dollls )unll IN0
t;U
WaIrmll Eh. WI 24, 5C 25,00* y, C) 0 25.OUk
Service 1.W
f'unural unu Isms
Il0 110 fc)o L•• I: U(, I'.° III, 1111 1111 Ilq IIU IUI Ills
Gscurtsl 1.2,0(
46 11101. 11 11 12100 ahnrdu cllnr(le Waco nuLu uhn~'dl cluu''lu tJlnl,Ju rhnrdel c;hal:yc td1FIY9, cfl,uyu
90 In1U, 15,tN1 24,UU 21,0( II1 112 IN en
Accident 3,00 2,(J0 CI>oL° 1 ts0 2.(}0
llllense 9,01 2;00 2.00 2,00 2,00 00 9,00 noLa }
1leporl 2,UU 3.uU 113
vii IN 11,'lu
UnpUUllll 13, 1d} I'3,61J 19, s( Ito nu 0c1 3, U0 ttdlit, 11" 1 HUI
ulil udlu,l,11 uiml,ll tlclinill arluU.lt nrllnl.l u111niit
adild11 admin nclnli 1 1
Poo Cue rue Part Ca13 rue Pure fats ?:uu
rue
i
i
i
I
a i
€ ~ E
1 I ~ I 1 •
i
5, U0 tuu tl) llu r;llueyacl al'PUI: 0 C1Ly c.u'clJn,tllciu 1;;
$'1.5,01} LurilutCUls ~Y,SU iu'ununl, I'c:ul $
t
WulrnuL SO Vlcue ntn1:'ka('
1m 13kled.
{ 111n11a1e ultly uuuduultll CtnlurnJ ullctsrLn Co,.' inei.Ll.ttr ul'Ll.:uh), Pt:lvnl.rl I,tulLu,Itun:) taro Ill;on:,url by Llil• blilluu Ixat!lu:l.uwut.
1 I
r IJ 1111 oLhur aeuurt:u,
I
"lIt Wcicl.h LIONS noL uolutuuL ruluel;tl uucsol'LB. I~I'Iv,tl,u r;1,,ullIn1111 huturm L IIU usl.wLa <IUCI luulal, Illlvo .I lrlLwil;, I''nlici
tl,i,I,auL uu")rt VUlli(11.00 nL a'0111OV90 Or 91,(10 put: vcsllJclts. I; :f su1, Illlu Lhls[(Ili ILUJ',
1$2,00 fix' CJ11sL II lxuluu larlle Llwi° 1 1'ul,url ill 11 uulr.u'uLu cal,nlf'lul1 I ~ i
1
1
_I
I
i
8UkY6Y RESULTS--U8ER CIIARGt8 AND Pk RHIT FEES
PUO4IC WORKS DEPT
DEPAA",NT CUPPENT CONSULTANTS STAFF
} FEES REC. R_§C, D 8 N LINOIUN 0ALI,AB FT,iItORTII OARLANU GRAND 1NVI r~(1 h'NSVI LLR HES ITS P
_ NO IF~CIIApdfiOH
j! hUSLYC
j~K6
} Curb m 5,00 5,00 II/C N/C 10,00
11F +2,00 8w 2$ 15,00 N/C N/C $4.00 Rem 416,o0
I 81gn MeCam $20,00
PotmitS $20.UO Dq`IF PAIL fl-~ 50.00 AqMod $25 -100$45 -600-!OQ 18q U $5,00 $5.00 $60,00 $20,00
.S pm 15 0-5505 206-toe Of-18 slo P-$9,50 Alum i
$65,00
Lot $50 -200$65 »601-157 308- 120
D8 $100 2-3s129 50I
0-90 20
a 51-100$25
101-200$]5
20
1-300$15
301-400$55
401-500$10 i
Sol- $100
Cart[(. $20,00 $2n,o0 310.00 510,00 20,00 $5.00
of $2$,00 NBC 420,00 $50,00 $25.00
on ~
(A11, Sseed on.
4 existing Bldg) I
aoerd of I l1i
CC Aptov $100 1 ,Vg1 Appl11o0 35,00
$35.00 $50.00 CC Appt0V $10,00 $50,60 025,00 !
nt $175.00 coatdloo
5H»20!{ COmmsi9o
200,00 Sl~eo$200
is Ptrk Iote$250
$1504
I park np
a t
j k
99i
1.
f
i
I
I
I
,i
f page 2 of 2 pages
fll l
! 8URV8y R88UVi'B--UASp CHAm's AND PI•;RMIT FV..Bs
` PUBLIC WORKS
II ~ b6NTUN~R D.N~ URtPCEN
tlppAp7NENT CUPRRHT OONBULTANTi3 M7APC
FEES ppC. NBC, M0180N AHbINUTOH bA1,LAp LIjL ATN UARIANU BRAND PpAIR[N IpV1Ntl L lBVILLf; M99 ST8 PIANO ICHApb
yieed
Cutting Ilealth Admin AdmlA Admin AdMin Mows In NAM NealUh Hide Health Ileplth f
II bept ;50 ♦ ;56 + ;200 ♦ 175,00 4 Cyole" Dept mpt 12N BryPt Dept Dept
$30-Hr Mewlnq Mowing MowLlg charged by
coat Cost coot eq.Pt
440,00 Ao[e
a 2M-10M 421
10-I5M 470
15-21H 475
I
1
:
i
i
e
i
i
1
SURVEY RESULTS - USER CHARGES AND
PERMIT FEES
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
PERMIT FEE5
s 1. ADyI:MN
i
$20 - Commercial
$10 - Residential
$ 5 - Reinspection
2. ARLI C3 TN
$15 - Commercial
$10 - Residential
$20 - Reinspection
AS
3. Q4NLL
} Value of Work ee
$ 0 - 500 $15 ..501 - 1500 20
25
1;501 - 3,000
3,001 5,000 30
5,001 - 50,000 4 + 0,525%
Sign Brackets .00525
50,001 100,000 $56 + 0,420%
Sign Brackets 00420
1000001 500,000 $i61 + 0,3159:
Sign Brackets .00315
500,001 or more $686 + 0,210%
Reinspection Fee No Answer
46 F'I'. W01,T9
Fee,
t coo of Fixtures
0 100 .20 each
` over 100 .15 each
appliances, motors, ntc. $2 each up to 100
$1,50 each over 100
-a $10 Minimum Fee
$10 Reinspection Fee
$1 5 .
1~1 c3ARLANO
i
$20 Commercial
$10 - Residential '
Validation (No Charge) i
$5 - Reinspection Fee
,
i
,I
i
Page 2
Permit Fees
Public Works Dept.
6. GRAND PRAIRIE
Remodel - Per Mixture ,
New Construction - Based on square footage of building
3 7. T,,~VrNC3
Minimum $10 for Service Work
A
Minimum $15 for Additional Plugs + Service Work
j Voucher System
8, r,EwISVILLF
Value of_Wark permit Fee (Residential)
I
$ 1 - $ 10000 $10 - Minimum
11001 - 2,000 $10 for $1,000 + $1 for each additional $100 ?
21001 - 25,000 $20 for first $2,000 + $3 for each additional
$2,000
25,001 - 50,000 $89 for first $25,000 + $2,50 for each
additional $1,000
50,000 - 100,000 $151,50 for first $50,000 + $1.50 for each
additional $1,000
100,001 + $226,50 for first $100,000 + $1.00 for each
additional $1,000
}
Commercial
Square footage x ,013 i
Reinspection Fee - $15.00 14I
k
9. M,~SQU,7T1;
New Commercial (Based on Square Footage)
0 - 5,500 square foot $5.00
551 - 50,000 square foot $1016
50,001 -100,000 square foot $.075 sq. ft, + $125
1000001 + 1.2~ sq. ft, + $375
$5.00 Reinspection Fee after second time
Somodel (Based on cost of ,fob) ~
0 - 1,000 Minimum $10 {
10001 - 3,000 $15
3,001 - 10;000 $20
10,001 - 50,000 .0020 x $ Value
500001 - 100,000 $25 + .0015 x $ Value
1000001 + $75 + .0010 x $ Value
Apsrtn~anta:
$10 per Apartment Unit
? $15 per eq. ft, unit 3i
I
r
Page 3
Permit Fees
Public Works Dept,
10, PLANO
General contractor - $2.75 per 100,000
Residential Minimum $5,00
Add./Alt, based on valuation (Residential)
loss that $100,000 $10,00
$100,000 - 200,000 $15.00
$201,000 - 300400 $20,00
$301400 + $30.00
Commercial Based on Square Footage
0 3,000 sq. ft. $ 60
3,001 - 10,000 sq. ft. $ 80
10,001 - 100,000 sq, ft. $100
over 100,001 $120
Construction Trailer (Temp. Power $10,00)
4
$30.00 Rainspection Fee
F
11, RICHARn$00
Single Family - $175
Remodel based on valuation - $10 per $1,000
25 minimum, 75 maximum
Duplexes - $225
Commercial (New & T.F.O.) based on sq, ft. 'I
0 - 2,500 sq, ft, $225
20501 - -100000 sq. ft. $225 base fee + 80 sq.`ft, i
~k 10,001 - 50,000 sq. ft; $125 base fee + 7~ sq, ft,
r 50,001 » 100,000 sq. ft. $625 base fee + 0 sq, ft.
100,001 - 300,000 sq, £t, $625 base fee * 0 sq, ft',
over 300,000 sq. ft. $625 base fee * 40 sq. ft.
Square foot x 0 per sq, ft, + add to base minimum rate
E
li
E
i.
s
F,
l
N
I
I
f I I Of 3 SURVItY RUMTS - USRR CIIARORS AND PERMIT MNS
111 Public Works Dept,
r CURRRNT CONS STAVV GRAND
f OPPMUMRNT MRLS RRCADDLSON ARLINGTON DALLAS FT~WORTN tlARLANb pNA1RtL' LRVL11 1[AVILt,E 11f5 ULTK PI,At10_RLCNAKIISO
pUSLIL' WORKR
Animal Conttial 15.00- 20.00- 20.00 - 0 - $15 - $25 20.00 $20 $50 $10-030 $19.00 $25.00 $5 SIS o S10-20
tmpound 84.50 112.10 15.00 a is
40.05
Holding w
$mall Animals y y
r $2/day
(Oags) 2100 3.15 4.00 $31day $21day $21day $3/day $3/daY - 0 ' - 0 - $ I/doy
V
Large Animals m
( (Cattle) 3.00 5163 6.00 NIA $4)day $2)dny $51day 051day - 0 - - 0 - $51day $tlJdey o
Adopt Lou
Actual Coate 10.00 10.00 10,00 $5525 $14,00 $35-40 N/A $1-10 $13.00 $2-18 $10.00
Ruthanasis _ , _ - - -
Residents 4.11 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - N/A - 0 - 0 - - 0 - $5.00 0 - j
5uthaneeie ~ ~ ~ ~
Non-Residents 30.00 IU100 N/A N/A - 0 NIA - 0 m/A 0 - N/A N/A ;
Varese#
Retrieval 5.00 5119 5.00 - 0 410,00 M/A 95.00 0 0 0 0
Animal
Rabies
I lnvaatlgatie j
**(ntlne - $10.00 plus $2.00/day at Center
canlne - $20,00 plus $2,001day At Center
' f
I
x
t
I
it
i
V
i
9
i
I L 01 3 S00Y 111'.501:18 - 1141;11 CIIAIuAte ANTI I`NAMII• FI9S8
CIl111111 N'f CONB. 4T'APF OIIAND
IIII'AIM1111I' PRU R80. RNLI. ADDESON ARLINGTON DALLAS FT. WORI'II OR LAND _PRAIRIE IRVING iIM BVILIX NLSItU I'IE PLANO RICHARDS01
PUBLIC RORXS
Impound only Y,00 - 0 - $5.00 N/A $2.00 $61,00 $5.00 $10;50- - 0 - $1/doy Same as
19.00/ lioldin
rley ~L'Harge to
Ustra - 0 - 134,37 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 - $20,00 0 - 0 - 0 - 1
aitations
Nedian Fine 30,00 25,90 26.00 $25.35 7 t $41.00 7 $27.50 7 $16,50
925 ;
Animal Regis,
Unneutered
Unapayed _
Animals 0 - 5.00 5.00 $1.00 N/A $9.00 $ 5,00 $3.00 NIA N/A N/A $6.00
Neutered
spayed
Animate - 0 - 2.00 9100 $1,00 I7/A $3.00 $5.0D $ LUO N/A NIA N/A $3,00
0
I
1
i
I
j'
i
i
7
dots
SURVEY RCSULTS _ USF11 CHARGES AND PF:RPI1,1' F'F:F1S
o>;NmoNis u,ll, o1azF~eiN
CURRRNr CONSUL'rANrs 5TnFp
n~~A 19CFT _ ~ F_fF7 IiCC+~ ,_[1CC~, AbU 5U1J Al t'"(J'I'ON - pALLnb__,_- FT,WJ1T11 OAIILANU _ -PGRAND
1ULIC WORKS -
Draintie ,U6 ,0'12
hYai Consultants NSIJV Curvoa 75%-ASCL
na solar x
Answer
Projects Engineers Consultants Curve 1.23 ~ Y N0
_
Regular
Cnglnears 25 -Eng 5_6% No charge
Sewer Water and Consultanta 00vornment
Projects Salar
No Chargo- strnighL Ur
In-house
- arnall prof, }
I S1 3 Sl,s4 S3 - $A
cost per
nd l vld.l $2.OU No Answer ~ 53,00 from' No Answer
Maps Direct P0or $2'10 _
from 811aIng
PCInLar Scale :
1
-
IF'I ~N
UENTON'B UU M, URF'
C
A.VPARti1JENT URREENT CONSULTANTS STAP - - - -
_ R>;Cy_ IIiVINU ME5 UITN~_ PL NO
I~t cl) nl~bsoN
~~tckopxs
Street ,06 ,072 Consultantn,• TSI>R-
Uralnaga
Projects Uond Proj,/ Curve A In llouse Only Straight
ConnulLahkA Salary x.
Tn-1JOU9a
Water 5 ;awn Ceneral rBPE - or F10 Mtllllplior j
ProJaato Fund Consul tants No charge
` Co0L Per $J-3 S1 S4 -
Indlvidual No Answer No Answer $3,00 $2,30
Maps No Answer.
s
l
t
~ f
E
.
1
A
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
USER FEE STUDY - 1933
COSTIREVENUE SUMMARY
f
DAVID V, ORIFF/rH
AND A SS O1Ar, Lib,
gAae~wwMpppSpeawtAa b aorwnmurnt
rMvlm(A PExAilJd~i°sro +i°r rA riN/ba s#6
•c
N
t
INTRODUCTION
This report contains the results of a study of service fees
3
charged by the City of Denton, Texas. Fees are charged for certain
M services in order to recover all or part of the cost of providing the
service from the Individuals and businesses who use or receive primary
benefits from those services. As the objective of charging fees is to
,I
s recover costs, as opposed to maximizing revenues, determining the cost of
providing each service Is therefore essential to evaluating the
!I
reasonableness of the related fees.
i 1
s
Costing Methodology
There are many different concepts of cost that may be used. In
establishing service fees, a fully allocated cost is often regarded as fair j
and equitable. The fully allocated cost Includes not only the directly
Identifiable costs (i.e, the cost of personnel, supplies, equipment) etc., i,
ti directly involved In delivering the service) but also a portion of that
Indirect costs allocated In an objective manner. Indirect costs Include the
{EE
costs of central administration, departmental supervision, and building t
I occupancy, which ca-',not be Identified with any single service, but are
r.
necessary to support operations of an entire department or the City as a.
A whole.
The approach used here was to develop the fully allocated cost f
E I
of each fee-generating service. All service area costs were based on
~l
J'J budgeted expenditures for 1993, rather than actual spending In previous
f
j years, It is felt that the budgeted costs more closely reflect the expected
r
C
I.•
.._111
i
N
,
expenditure outlays for 1993, for which fees are to be evaluated. Directly
identifiable costs were found by analyzing the personnel and other
II resources needed to provide the service. Indirect costs were then
allocated on objective bases3 central administration In proportion to total
expenditures, occupancy In proport.lon to floor space utilized, etc. The full
costs were then divided by the volume of actlv,lty to determine an average
cost per unit.
Limitation of Cost Data
f Municipal accounting and financial inanagement systems In many
Instances are not designed to capture expense and revenue data by units of
e
a service provided. This results In different fees being recorded In the same l
fund with no distinction between different fees being made on receipts,
and expense data not Identified to the actual service provided,
In some kristances, the limitation of data precluded matching cost 1
and revenue for a specific fee. This occurred particularly In those cases
where different fees were charged for related services and all the fees
were reported under the same fund (e.g. electric permits, recreation
classes, etc,), In those cases, the cost and revenue were matched fora I
grouping of related fees with an appropriate unit measure employed.
I
When comparing the cost of service provided to the revenue i
generated from particular fees, this study made the matchup based on the
existing fee structure, In the future, the City may be Interested In an
kl
expanded study of the structure of fees, The scope of this new study
would be to review and analyze the basis for differential rates.
a
~a
AO
I'
page 2
i
:j
i
1
J
Y..~. _ .ter
i
Hon-Cost Considerations In Fee Evaluation
In the process of analyzing the service fees charged by the City,
both "cost" and "non-cost" factors were considered, Examples of "non-
cost" factors In establishing the price of fees are;
Elasticity of Demand
* Collection Considerations
Competition from the public and private sectors
Economic Cycles
Impact on Disadvantaged or selected groups
Community need
l
When It seemed likely that raising fees to full cost would reduce
the volume of the activity significantly, or produce collections problems, l
i
an "alternative revenue projection" section was added. This section
provides different fee levels (below full cost) with varying assumptions
a regarding volume of usage. If the City of Denton should decide not to 44
s 1
recover its full cost, this section may be helpful In selecting a fee which
would maximize revenue with minimal effect on the current volume of
1
actlvlty, ~I
Other Uses of Cost Data 1
ii This study distinguishes directly Identifiable costs and Indirect
costs, In many Instances, indirect costs may be regarded as fixed for the
City as a whole--that Is, they will not Increase or decrease in total with
changes In the level of any service. In many Instances, the directly
identifiable Costs may be regarded as variable--Increases or decreases In I:
service level will result In Increases or decreases In expenditures.
page 3 f'
I
f
Thus, If there was a decrease In service level the variable cost and
therefore, the full cost of the service would decrease. BY isolating
directly Identifiable costs and indirect costs, the City will know what level
of fees need to be charged In order to recover its full cost at different
service levels.
s'
Also, by Isolating the directly identlflable costs, the City has a '
starting point for make-or-buy (contracting) decisions. If the City
y
contracts out a service It Is presently providing, the City will still have its
fixed (Indirect) costs and will only save its variable (directly Identifiable)
{ costs. Thus, if the service by an outside contractor cannot be provided
for less than the City's variable cost, there is no "cost" reason to contract
1
out the service.
It should be pointed out that for small changes In volumes, I
directly Identifiable costs will not change. In other words, a small drop In
the demand for service will not result in eliminating personnel. But the
t
time "freed-up" for that person can now be directed to other activities,
thereby, reducing the cost to that service area with the reduced volume.
Pro acted Revenue Chance
We have projected revenues that would be realized If fees were
I raised to the level of full cost, with no reduction In volume. Where
"potential Increased revenue,' is projected on summary pages at the
a beginning of the study and on the facing pages of each department,
( consideration has also been given to those cases where fee Increases will f
I
xi discourage usage. Thus, projected revenues In the summaries are based
t4
tt either on fees raised to full cost or fees recovering only partial costs,
f
depending on the clrrumstances related to that particular fee.
page 4
. j
'1
.r
SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL REVENUE
The following schedule lists all fees, by responsible department,
which are currently underrecovering the cost of service provided by the
City of Denton,
f This schedule lists fee revenue projected based on recovery of full
costs, the annual revenue projected based on the current pricing of fees,
s
and the projected total revenue expected if fees are increased to recover
either the full costs of service or partial costs of service.* Also listed Is
4 the potential Increased revenue the City will gain at the new fee level
r I.e., the difference between revenue at current pricing and revenue
expected as a result of fees being charged at either full or partial cost,
k
* Those fee Increases selected which recover only partial costs can be
sound w1thlRti the "alternative' revenue projection" section of the individual
fee description, This selection Is not meant to reflect a "recommended
i
choice" but rather is Included within a range of possible fee choices listed t
within the section. j
t
r
sj
Page 5
i
S
l
i
CITY OF DENTON
REVENUE SUMMARY
i=
Dull Cost Current Projected Increased 1
I Department/Fee Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue
A ;
t Police Department
Warrant Service $ 42,100 $ 3,000 $ 9,772 $ 6,772
Funeral Escorts 30935 2,500 30935 1,435
Accident and Offense Reports 106,896 4,500 50400 900
Vehicle Impoundments 12,714 -0- 110526 11,526
Flnance Department
Purchasing Dlvlsloni
Williams Square Parking $ 16,049 $ 71440 $ 16,049 $ 8,609
Tax Divisions
Tax Certificates 100259 50440 101259 4,819
r Appraisal District 21089 -0- -0- -0-
i
Llbr~ I
Library $ 172,969 $ 77,516 $ 77,516 -0-
Parks be Recreation
Department
~y
Civic Center Rent $ 150617 $ 130842 $ 15,617 $ 1,775
Center Staff Classes 107,105 120625 26,452 13,827
Center Contract Classes 116,620 23,697 36,352 120655
`f Tennis Staff Classes 10,190 61130 100190 41060 1
Tennis Contract Classes !0,182 6,609 10,182 3,573
Athletic Leagues 90566 20360 4,720 2,360
821
Athletic Rentals 5,066 40245 51066
Athletic Practice 28,782 16,120 24,180 8,060;
Swimming Class 47,948 14,214 17,064 2,850
a I,
Individual Swimming 63,156 28,000 379240 91240
A Playgrounds 690844 L,680 3,360 11680
rl Cemeteries 104,550 61813 13,626 6,813 t
Page 6
<J
J
CITY OF DENTON
REVENUE SUMMARY
(Continued)
Department/f?ee Full Cost Current Projected Increased 1
Revenue Revenue Revenue
Revenue
Alr ort
Airport $ 82,493
$ 30000 $ 82,493 $ 52,493
s
I. ~ f
Public Works Department i
Animal Controls 1
Animal Impounds $ 31,638 $ 31449 $ 4,600
Animal Holding 50 393 $ 11151
Animal Adoption 10269 1'786 31349 1,563
Euthanasia 8,216 112040 88 1,040 .0-
Carcass Retrieval 5,343 621 333
j Rabies Investigation 21 231 1,905 1,977 72 j
Citation 10,231 2x038 211231 19,193
7,900 10,231 2,331
Streetst
. Street cuts
r $ 315,131 $ 120,000 $ 315,131 $ 195,131
Engineering Dlvlslont i
Capital Improvements $ 163,974 I
Maps 10,960 137,037 $ 163,974 $ 26j937
1,351 100960 90609
Inspection Division: I
Board of Adjustment $ 12,233 $ 950
Weed Cutting 21 247 $ 1,900 $ 950
a Sunk Vehicles i,103 19'625 18,o19
I 10,635 -0- 623
Meblle Home Inspections 6,667 -0-
lectrtc
6,607. 6,607
Permits 43
Curb cuts 2616812 25,702 43,812 180110 i
f Sign Permits 21263 2,080 2,616 536
Certificates of occupancy 51444 2o9600 7621263 1,503
5,444 20484 1
s
A Page 7
y
- r ~~l
k
h
CITY OF DENTON
i
REVENUE SUMMARY
(Continued)
Full Cost Current Projected Increased 1
Department(Fee Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue
Y
i Planning do Community Development
Department
Plat Processing $ 106,132 $ 81500 $ 1060132 $ 97,632
' Zoning Changes 540035 14,000 44,800 30,800
Hlotoric Landmarks 1,418 50 1,418 10369
Community Development
Block Grant 11792 .0_ -00. -0-
i
I '
Fire Department
Fire Inspections $ 109$63 $ _0. $ 109,363 $ 109,363
Ambulance 4410101 329,672 441,101 66,480
i
TOTAL, INCREASED REVENUE $ 765,465 1
* Requires actl4n of 5tate Legislature
E.
j Addendai
Street Cuts $ 318,635 $ 120,000 $ 318,635 $ 198,635
Curb Cuts 10,523 2,080 10,523 8,443 r
Barricades 17,792 -0- 17,792 17,792 j
Animal Licensing 7,398 4- 24,000 16,608
New Utility Customers 810 ..0- 810 810 f
1. Increased Revenue equals Projected Revenue less Current Revenue.
j ~
j
Page 8
r
1
r
3
,tai
i
I
Aim
DAVID M, GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD,
cfm 3601 Accounting Specletists to Government
CIIRVING, TEXAS 76062/(214) SUITE 69.1386
` June 15, 1983
Mr. Frank Varelia
Acting Director of Finance
r City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76102
} Dear Mr, Varellas
It was a pleasure meeting with you on June 14th to briefly discuss the City of
Denton Cost Allocation Plan for FY 1983, This letter will summarize the results of
E our earlier discussions and highlight the significant results of the Plan.
Electric Fund
The current cost allocation plan, based on budgeted expenditures for FY 1983,
l identifies total general fund services of $985,322 to the City 4 Electric Utility. This
represents an Increase of 16 percent over the FY 1982 amount of $849,188. f
( Attachment I to this letter compares the 1982 and 1983 allocations to the Electric
Fund by central service department. The total Increase for FY 1983 ($136)134) is
largely accounted for by refinements to the Data Processing Department allocation.
x In FY 1983, the JASPER job accounting system has permitted a more objective
analysis of data rocessing resource utillxation, As a result, the Electric Utility has
been shown to benefit not only directly from higher levels of data processing 1
services, but also Indirectly through the Accounting and Customer Service Divisions
and Personnel Department allocations, Overall, these four central services account
1 for nearly 60 percent of the total Electric Utility Increase.
Water and Sewer Fund
i The FY 1983 plan identifies $067,863 of general fund services Incurred on behalf of
the Water and Sewer Fund. This compares to $627,248 for FY 1982 and represents
r an Increase of 6,5 percent. I
Attachment It to this letter compares the 1982 and 1983 allocations by central
As can be seen from that schedule, the FY 1982 total increase
service department.
($40,613) is also largely accounted for by the refined Data Processing Department
allocation, However, hi this instance, the Increases from Data Processing, personnel, '
r.~ Accounting, and Customer Service have been offset to a large degree by decreases In
=1 Internal Service Fund allocations. (I
($It 1:
~{~1
E.
i
lip
tip. ~ f
i
F~
i'
i_
r r
T T
04
dm
Mr, Frank Varella
Page two
June 13, 1983
Sanitation Fund
The City's Sanitation Fund Is comprised of Solid Waste--Resldentlal, Solid Waste--
Commerclal, and Solid Waste--Land Fill. While the FY 1983 plan allocates Indirect
costs to these activities Individually, for purposes of this presentation, the allocations
are considered in total for the Fund.
The FY 1983 plan Identifies total general fund services of $367,853 to the Sanitation i
Fund. This compares to $308,631 for FY 1982--an Increase of over 19 percent.
i
Attachment III to this letter compares the 1982 and 1983 allocations by central
service department. The total Increase for FY 1983 ($59,222) Is primarily due tot
(1) Increased General Government allocatlons--the Assistant City Manager for Public
Works, who was previously budgeted within Public Works Adminlstratlon, was Included
4? within this account In FY 1983; (2) Public Works Adminlstratlve staff Identified higher
levels of service to Sanitation for FY 19831 and (3) Customer Service allocations
Increased'signlfIcantly. The latter is largely attributable to higher Data Processing
costs Identified to Customer Service in FY 1983,
Due to existing constraints, the results of the FY 1982 cost allocation lan were not
fully l
• mplemented for the Sanitation
Fund, Accordingly, this area should now be
evaluated by City management In view of current constraints and prerogatives.
Internal Service Funds
~ - i
The FY 1983 plan Identifies the following general fund services to the City's
Internal Service Fundsr i
Vehicle Maintenance 91 r 147 f
Machine Shop 22 138
Warehouse/Central Stores - 74,452 I
These general fund expenditures were then re-allocated to benefitting City I
i departments, Including Enterprise Funds. This procedure provides for an equitable I'
allocation of general fund services to final users, However, It should be noted that
In the case' of the Machine Shop,' the FY 1983 estimated operating deficit of $16,796;
has also been allocated In the plan. For the Vehicle Maintenance and Warehouse
operations) only allocated general fund expenses have been reallocated,
The City of. Denton may wish to consider the desirability of Incorporating general
fund central services in the Internal Service rate structures. If this approach is
elected, the total amounts shown above for FY 1983 should be used, Also,
appropriate adjustments to the plan allocations to Enterprise Funds would then be
required to prevent duplicate charging of these expenses.
a
i
{
i
I
V
I
dM ~
Mr. Frank Varella
Page three
June 15, 1983
(
Indirect Cost Rate
The City of Denton presently operates no significant grant programs which provide
i for the full reimbursement of indirect costs. However, It is expected that such
I grants may be awarded to the City In the future. Accordingly, It would be to the
! City's best advantage to have on file an Indirect cost rate for possible future use.
This would permit Indirect costs to be Included as grant budgets are prepared and
submitted for approval
For this purpose, Federal regulations provide for a simplified procedure to establish a
consolldated Indirect cost rate applicable on a City-wide basis. This procedure
specifies a standardized, simplified methodology for determining an indirect cost rate. f
Accordingly, the methodology In most cases does not allow for the potentially higher
recoveries which could be obtained
where more sophisticated cos flnd
used. t ing procedures
are f
Under the current circumstances at the City of Denton, this method for computing an
Indirect rate Is Ideal. We previously computed a consolidated, Clty-wide rate based
on the FY 1982 City budget. The resulting rate of 17.35 percent of direct salaries
and wages is still valld and should be maintained In your flies. (An additional copy
of the rate computation is enclosed for your convenience.) In the event that It
becomes more advantageous to the City, a "full" Indirect cost rate(s) can be
established in the future In consideration of actual circumstances then existing.
Federal regulations specify that local units of government must prepare cost
# allocation plans/lndleect cost rates before Indirect costs are claimed under Federal
1 awards. However, the proposals need not be submitted to the cognizant Federal
r agency for negotiation and approval unless requested to do so by that agency,
Accordingly, the City may kee the rate computation on file and use It as
opportunities arise. Should Fedeeral or State approval subsequently be required, we
will represent the City fully In that endeavor, f
Under the terms of our professional services contract dated April 5, 1983, the agreed
' upon fee of $8,000 Is now due. I am enclosing an Invoice for this amount and will i
appreciate your having It processed at your earliest convenience.
FI
t
F
I
i
1
C71"
i
Mr. Frank Varella
f Page four
June 15, 1983
Davld M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd., Is pleased to have had the opportunity to
again provide cost allocation services to the City of Denton. We are especially
grateful Jor the expanded opportunity assoclated with the upcoming fee study and
eagerly` anticipate commencing that exciting project.
i
Sincerely `yours,
ff
,
Randall R. Handley
Manager I
E RRHdt
Enclosures
cci Mr. G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
f
f ! f
t
7
~ i
n ~
S
j 1
1 t
r~
f.
j
r
r
a
r
1 feu ~
ATTACHMENT I
I4 r, City of Denton, Texas
4 Comparison of Central Service Allocations
.S
rI Electric Fund--PYs 1982 and 1983
Fiscal Fiscal Increase
Central Services 1982 1983 (Decrease)
Building Depreciation $ 545 $ 545
Nondepartmental 61035 10,857 $ 4, 822
Building Operations 39,411 39,466 53
General Government 360601 40, 397 31996
Personnel Department 44,164 54)347 10)183
Purchasing D vlslon. 16,518 16,893 375
Finance Administration 3,404 3t60 239
Data Processing 7,863 22,751 14t888
Accounting Division 67,782 75,188 7,406
Customer Service 413,438 459,643 44 207
Cashiering Division 46,308 44t899 t
Energy Conservation 70,581 132,969 62388)
la Engineering Division 9,590 20938 1652)
Legal Administration 24,437 26,450 2t013
f Vehicle Maintenance 12,996 10 170
1 Machine Shop 14,300 8,464 (2,826)
Warehouse/Central Stores 39,015 33t500 (51836)
(3,315)
(30315)
Totals
;E $8491188 $_985132 2 136,134
rt ,
To-,
ATTACHMENT 11
r
City of Denton, Texas
Comparison of Central Service Allocations
Water and Sewer Fund--FYs 1992 and 1983
Distal Fiscal Increase
Central Servlces 1982 1983 (Decrease)
I
BuJlding Depreciation $ 355 $ 355 $ .0.
Nondepartmental 80868 61642 (20226)
Building Operations 27,117 27,t86 69
GeHerat. CoV"ernmen
t 30,189 347176 3,957
Personnel Department 37,518 45,722 89204
Purchasing `Division 13,317 150626 2,309
Finance Administration 21198 29458 260
j Data Processing' 60361 90946 3,585 j
Accounting` Division 71,719 81,237 9,518
Customer SerVlce 286,284 3170477 31,193
Cashiering Divlslon 33,767 32, 490 (1, 277 )
Engineering Division 35$974 29t359 (6, 515 )
Legal Administration 24,437 26,450 2,013
Vehicle Maintenance 19,592 15,330 (4,262)
! Machine Shop 11,646 6,894 (4,752)
Warehouse/Central Stores 18,006 16,545 (11461)
3
r Totals $617t249 667,863 40,615
I I I#
j
i
l
3
E
i
I i
is
I
i
' i
ATTACHMENT III
City of Denton, Texas
Comparison of Central Service Allocations
Sanitation Fund--PYs 1982 and 1983
Fiscal Fiscal Increase
` Central Services 1982 1983 (Decrease)
r 1
Nondepartmental $ 2,433 $ 10,569 $ 8,136
Building Operations 71511 7,673 162
General Government 18,793 32p784 139M
Personnel Department 15,659 17,804 2,145
Purchasing Division 974 543 (431)
Public Works Administration 24,902 30,626 5,724
Finance Administration 734 791 57 i
Data Processing 69010 31857 (2)153)
Accounting Division 239358 22,340 (1,018)
Customer_Servl(o 118,1 o8 1660640 48, 532
Cashiering Division 33,724 30,423 (31301)
Legal Administration 5, 431 3j879 447
Vehicle Maintenance 360135 28,277 (7,858)
Machine Shop 120123 7,176 (4,947)
Warehouse/Central Stores 2,736 21472 (264)
Totals 308t631 367,933 $ 390222
f
f ~
i
5
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
CONSOLIDATED LOCAL CENTRAL SERVICES
COST ALLOCATION PLAN AND
COST RATE
FOR THENYYEARCENDING SEPTEMBER030, 1982
DIRECT CO
UNALLOWABLE TOTAL INDIRECT SALARIES (a)
COSTS ALL
- COSTS
STS 6 WAGES
-INDIRECT COST POOL: OTHER
Central Services Benefiting
Federal Programs
F
City Manager/Admin. E 327,995 f 4,024
Building Operations 327,115 4s140 # 323,9
i Legal Administration 156$60 322,975
75
Personnel 3,250 153;110
204,316
Data Processing 490,194 800 203,516
Finance Admin, 75,556 1+400 488,794
Purchasinq 106,783 450 75,106
Accnuntinq 167,014 500 1069283
Nondepartmental (b) 912,073 167+014
Assistant City Manager (c) 85,011 8460073 660000
1+000 84,011
O AECT COST RA56.
Costs of All Other City
Departments/Agencies lE
Customer Service q 7 73
Cashiering 12+72 19,141 # 317l6l
Cnergv Conservation ' 95,834 # 111,429
Municipal Court 48,654 6,889
Ci 62,170 44,590 4,064
vil Defense 60,449 57,720 44
Planning A Comm, Devel, 156,660 43,Q3 17,396
j Airnort 57,925 126,174 300486
Tax 11500 65,716 11 827 440598 1
' Ennineerinn
i 276,376 6,100 464616 196200
1 Inspection 182,476 1 100 2230981 454695 l
Traffic Control r
g Street Patching 145,690 8,875 157,01! 23,705
366,451 929815 T91'6~
Street C164ninq 208,303 2 000 175,390
Street Construction 371,846, 10f,769 97;534
Street Lightfnq 286,000 10,000 151,108 210:7
Police Administration 111,733 4,935 38
'000
Police Inve.,t(W inn 346,012 1 50,298 280UoM
Police Administrative 183,489 ,350 30938
Police Patrol 7,200 300,724 43,938
Animal Control 1+455,993 47,649 122,512 53,777
Fire Administration 114404 21500 11230+785 177,555
Fire Operations 173,18 425
983,73068 922 38,636
2,098,551 1 88,839
Fire Prevention 73,579 22,500 37,047 139,Q04
Parks and Rgcr, Admin. 103,011 2'000 1 63,999
Swfmminq Pool Oper, 63,736 7+580
AthletiGS 39,795 39,275
itecr 96,700 224470 18 ,
eation 600 ,825
s~ Parks Maintenance 346,941 34+825 61,215
461 19 033 2270887 124,054
305,725 X51
0alanca Carried Forward $11,280,490 !
1
019 1019,746 # 1,990,780 # 64,811 # 2,ib5 653
6,1
'I
ITY OF 'OENTON, TEXAS
continued)
t,
UNALLOWABLE INDIRECT SALARIES (a) ALL
TOTAL COSTS _ COSTS A WAGES OTHER
INDIRECT COST BASE - CONT'O;
a
Balances Brought Forward $11,280,990 $ 1,019,746 $ T,990,780 $ 6,164,811 $ 24105,653
A
Library Admin. 105,562 58,092 41,470
Library Tech. Processing 43,410 390310 4,100
Library Circul. Control 550251 529151 30100
Library Adult Services 129,134 21,155 98,339 9,640
Library Child Services 38,410 4,680 33,405 325 i
Sanitation Fund (b) 1,452,706 196,186 616,840 639,680
i Electric Fund (b) 34,747,133 6,293427 2,420,029 26,033,177
Water b Sewer Fund (b) 6,0665815 2,596`,314 1,627,308 1,843,193
Working Capital Kund 709,369 1669589 364,823 177957
Recreation Fund 991200 4,000 _ 95,200
TOTALS: $54,727,980 $10,302,597 $ 1,9901780 $11,475,108 $30,959,495
INDIRECT COST RATE COMPUTATION:
Indirect Costs $ 1,990,780 r 17.35"
f Direct Salaries 75, 08
(a) Direct salary and wage base includes all fringe benefits I
(b) Reserve for salary adjustment is included in unallowables; salary adjustment
affects direct and indirect costs proportionately j
(c) Represents the costs of an Assistant City Manager and a secretary who are I`
separately budgeted from the City Manager's Office
i
i
t
t
E
F M
,t
t•
j
R
i
4
+
}
I 3 h: [
tt
f
I
3
't
z
r
fit:
- -T
I
{iJl ,111E 2 5196
CIAANAC its ding
r JOINT CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES
1 AtPN[JAL AssocIATE m[:mBER stmvrY
}
j Dear Associate
1 The Joint center for Political Studies (JCPS) is very #
interested in the opinions of its Associates. Therefore, we have
created the first annual JCPS Associates survey as a way to
gather your opinion. The results of the survey will enable us to '
strengthen the ever growing Associates Program.
Please help us to make the Associates Program as good as it
can be by taking a few minutes M to respond to the questions.
Once the results of the survey are compiled and analyted,
r this information will be shared with you. To facilitate the
prompt return of your responses to the survey questions, a post-
paid return envelope has been enclosed. Won't you please fill
the survey out now?
1
I We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you.
r 06incerely,
Eddie N. Williams 1
President
1
I
4
J
1. Here is a .list of some issues that concern people in this
country. Which of these are of most concern to you?
a. AIDS . homelessness
L~idhts m, o ca corruption
over
buso. soc a1 seourity
a o t ket
ia.E edjr0e
ent na a regnan
g, federal budget deficit r, unem o
i h. federal farm policy s. U.S. nuclear weapons policy
i. foreign policy to welfare reform
. foreign trade deficit u, other
j c, heal
Please list the issue that is most important to yousA~a
n
Now, looking at the list above, pleaase list the issue that is
second most important to you: t(KtatP~^
Finally, looking at the list above, please list the issue that is
i { third most important to yous vWf
2. There are many important national issues that press for
resolution. However, the following is a list of issues that may
be of great importance in your loogl community. Which of these
are of agst concern to you?
a. abortion i. nuclear waste management
b. AIDS problems of the homeless
u, civil rights of minority k. school prayer
groups teens e e
{ do cleaning up the environment t e quality of pubs
1 r rig ation
r use
1 g, ealth care o. other -
9 h. high cost of living
E
List the community issue that is most important to yous 001
Now, looking at the list above, please list the community issue
that is @e_4R.nd most important to yout~WLts( a Kc4fi
Finallys looking at the list above, please list the community
issue that is tbly& most important to yous ercMG
5
T
3. The outcome of the 1988 4. Generally speaking,
presidential election concerns politics interest me:
me: f
[ef a great deal [ "1 a great deal
[ ] a fair amount
I ] a little [ ] a little
` ! f J not at all [ ] not at all
II [ ] don't know ( ] don't know
5. The tVo most important ssues affecting my choice of a
presidential candidate are the candidate's stand on (check two):
[ J abortion
y [ ] economic issues
[ ] capital punishment [ eeducation
{ [ ] civil rights [ ] foreign policy
[ crime [ ] national defense policy
( drug abuse [ ] other
b. The two most important mrognal attributes influencing my
choice of a presidential candidate are (check twos
[ J strong leadership [ ] experienced '
compassion [ ] exciting
(rJ trustworthiness [ ] hardworking
C J knowledgeable [ ] religious
( ] intelligence [ good judgement in a crisis
L J gfets things done ( fairness
[ ] other
3
r 7. Of the two top presidential contenders, my choice for
a president ins
George Bush f
[ Wiohael Dukakis 1
! 8. My choice of the vice presidential running mate on the j
i, democratic side iss
[ ] Lloyd Bentsen [ ) Bob Graham {
( W Bill Bradley
[ ] Cuomo [ J Jesse Jackson
Mario
f ]sera Nunn I
{ ] Tom Vole [ ] Patricia Schroeder
C J John Glenn ( ] Undecided
[ J Al Gore [ ] other
9. My choice of the vice presidential running mate an the
republican side ins
[ ] Lamar Alexander [ ] Jack Kemp
[ Howard Baker Jeanne' Kirkpatrick
( ] James Baker [ J Bob Laxalt
[ ] George Deukmejian [ ] Jim Thompson
[ ] Robert Dole [y~-tndscided
[ ] Elizabeth Dole Other-
[ ] Thomas Man
a
704
10. I read the following newspapers and periodicals:
( ] The Boston Globe [6.OrAmerican Visions
[ ) The Chicago Tribune/ [ J Atlantic Monthly
k sun Times (J Black Enterprise
( ] The Christian Science [ABusiness week
monitor [ ] Ebony -
F [ ] international Herald ( ],The Economist
Tribune t v1' Essence
[ ] The London Times ( ] Forbes
' ( J The Los Angeles Times ( J Fortune
[ j The New York Times [ ] Jet
[v]' The Wall Street Journal ( ] The Nation
( J The Washington Post [ ] The New Republic
t C j Newsweek
[ ]'Pima
[ ] U.S. News & World Report
[ ] Other #rAd i;.,a y,ewwf4 k
12. When I read for pleasure it is generallys
[ J fiction [ PT'non-fiction
12. On the whale I have found the following JCPS Associates
Program benefits to be most valuable (check all that apply):
( e'FOCUS, the monthly JCPS magazine
Political Trendletter, a regular FOCUS feature
( ] COPS books
( iscount on JCPS publications
t n-house resource materials (papers, reports, clippings,
statistics, survey data, and more)
L ] The Joint Center's toll-free inquiry line
( eraonal invitations to COPS conferences and symposia
I L dater on national; events
[ ] 0 her program benefits (please l.ist)t
X99 ~ ,
{ l
A
it
1
fl
r
t
NOTE: We ask the following demographic information for
7 research purposes only.
f
17. My primary professional 20. The last grade or class I
affiliation is in: completed in school vast
-i
t
( J arts j ] High school, incomplete
i [ ] community services (grades 9 11)
' ( ) education
[ ),,financial services C ) High school graduate,
I (grade 12)
I jvovernment [ ] Technical, trade, or
C ) labor business school
[ ) law [ ) College, university
[ l manufacturing (non-degree)
( ] medicine [ ] College, university
[ ] non-profit graduate
{ ] religion ( ] Graduate school, non-
( ) retail/wholeaale de ree
[ ) transportation [sraduate school
f 3 utilities [ ] Other f graduate
18. My Annual income is: 21. My age is:
h
25
[ ].L5ss soxn 25K [ ]25 ddr 40
11 [ y]' 50 - 75K 40 - 55
( ] Over 75K [ ] Over 55
19. My ethnic origin/racial 22. I am as j
heritage is:
j ro-I.S. Citizen
[ ]►sian C ] Resident Alien I
C✓i elaek (African/Amer.) Other
( ] Chicano/Mexican Amer, E
i ] Native American 23. I am at
[ ? other Hispania
( ) Puerto Rioan [ ] emale
( ) white (Caucasian, male
nom-Hispania) ! i
[ ] Other 24, 1 live in the:
~ "I"Ex AS i
~ j~tate of
x [ vj zip code- - 702os
i
The following information is optional:
Names. ~~Vla fRlfboN
- Phones (Home)"ext.
Address 215 IF, MCV.,'NNE1/ (Bus.)f~tr1,5K"t➢~o7
city: b1 A%q
ti states.. `JOXAy zips noz-ba.
a
1
vl~'I
TEXAS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST SURVEY
of
This survey is designed to collect member opinions on TCMA goals and programs in
order to develop an appropriate services plan for our future.
We want to know your interest in rospective Association services and products as
r well as your perspectives on TCMA-related policy. issues. There are no right or
wrong answers--only your opinions, This is an opporturilty for you to share with the
Board how you believe TCMA can best serve your future professional needs.
E.
arr input shapes the
o C YOU pro ess on s'
Thank you for your cooperation.
f;
John Harrison
TCMA President &
City Manager, Waco
k
f
o.as oF~rc~~ i
t
:r
1. GOALS
1, Please indicate the Importance to you of the following association activities,
Rate only,your top three choices; 1, 2, 3.
Promoting the council-manager form of government
1 Promoting the image of the city management profession and its
Association
Providing communications items such as a newsletter &
directory
A Offering more educational programs regionally
E' Providing research & related survey reports on pertinent Issues
r, Providing state legislative representation of members' views
Z► Providing recruitment/placement services
Offering an annual conference
2, Please prioritize these statements In terms of their importance to you as
} TCMA goals. Rate only your top three choices; 11 29 3,
To encourage the growth of the Association
To provide personal support services to Individual members
To educate elected officials about the purpose and value of
professional management i
1 To provide oppportunides for professional development and
i continuing educadon
plan t ve as a clearinghouse for information on council-manager
propco of a high ethical standards among members of the
To work with other organizations in advocating the interests of
IoW governments
To facilitate professional interaction with assistants
To Increase the opportunities for TCMA members to Interact
with professionals from other disciplines within local '
government
2
J
.
3. How would you rate the or^,rall value of your TCMA membership?
J Excellent f yGood [ J Fair [ ] Poor
4. What do you consider the major reasons for being a TCMA member? (Rate
your top three choices: 1, 21 3.)
'a. To network with my colleagues who are also members
b. To stay up-to-date on developments In the profession
c. To Increase my professional knowledge and skills through
training opportunities and publications
d, To have access to personal and professional counseling on
Issues such as career planning and coping with being fired
t e. To have timely and thorough knowledge of job openings
f f. To enjoy the status of belonging to an organization that enforces
high ethical standards
i
g. To support and promote professional local government
management and adoption of the council-manager plan
h. To receive membership publications (TCMA newsletter,
directory, Prospects)
1. Other (specify)
II, EDUCATION
1.H~~~aayye you attended a TCMA annual conference In the last three years? 1
M~fyes O no
2. if you marked yes, how would you rate the following aspects of the annual
conference(s) In which you attended? f
Excellent Good Pair Poor I
1
R a. Topics [ J [ J [ ]
b, Speakers t
c. OnSite Logistics [ ] [ ] [t}i' [ ]
[ d. Social Activities [ ] [ J fir [ J
f' e. Spouse/Youth Activities
3. Flow would you rate the annual conference (overall) In enhancing your
professional effectiveness? Excellent [ J Oood (Fair [ ] Poor
3
±E
i
i
WRIFF
1
4, if you rated the annual conference (overall) as "fair" or "poor", what would you
change to enhance Its overall usefulness? ,
Ntet t. Af M.rr fJ~, fz<tt tee. t~f br',C
1,n A,W.ar-1//p
t,
{ 5, in your decision to attend or not attend a TCMA annual conference how
important are: Very Minimally Not
Important Important Important
3 a, Location of conference [
j b, Educational programs/speakers [ } [ ]
C. Conference fees [ ] [ } C~
d, Social activitj,~s
a, spouse/youth activities
f, Travel expenses [ ]
g, organizational budget constraints [ ] [
h. other (please describe)
6, Should TC~vtA Incorporate exhibits within its annual conference format?
E
I
[ } yes [ j rho
o cling its annual conference at some other time
7. dShould uring T the yeA a yes no
1
8. If yes, during which month would you prefer having the TCMA Annual
Conference?
ntly, the T'CMA annual conference covers 3 1/2 days beginning on
S day morning and concluding Tuesday noon. Is this format satisfactory?
g, pFYes
o i
[ I 1 n
10, If no, please indicate on which day of the week you would prefer t ie an S tl
conference to begin. [ ] Mon, ( Tues, [ } Wed. h r [ ] [ ] [ ]
Sun,
11, Should `1'C,MA co•s onsor/pardelpate in the design and conduct of workshops
seminars, and ~o er edducational programs with other TML affillatej
organizations? lY yeS [ ] no
~k
4
1
i,f
A
12, If yes, which months are best suited for you to attend educational programs?
Please list the three best months; bY*1tW AoWL, , and ,
13. Please Indicate the ideal length of time (includ travel time) that ou are
willing to devote to an education program; [ one day [ J two days ~J three
days) four days or longer
14, Please indicate on which day of the week you would prefer the educational
` rogram to begin: O Mon, f J Tues, ( Wed. O Thurs, kVri, Sat.
l J Sun,
S~
III, COMMUNICATIONS
i
i; 1. How would you rate TCMA's primary membership publications?
a. TCMA Newsletter (montha)
[ ]Excellent (I Good [ylr [ ] Poor
b. Prospects (listen~~,,eef position openings bimonthly)
[ ] Excellent [IWCW [ ] Fair [ ] Poor
a
c, TCMA Directory (annu directory of members)
Excellent Good ] Fair O Poor
j
2. Should TCMA continue to provide its members a newsletter? (q<es no '
3, If yes, how often would you prefer to receive the newsletter? [11 fonthly
[ J Quarterly [ J Semiannually
i
}
4, Should TCMAco~ ~tnue to provide its members with an annual membership
directory? [ yes no
i
5. If yes, should TCMA continue to solicit adve ng within the directory for
purposes of helping defray publication costs? r yes ( ] no
t
6, If TCMA continues to publish a membership directory, hould the association
{ sell it to non-member individuals and organizations? Kyes [ ) no
7. Should TCMA continue its "Prospects" service? [ ]yes [ ] no
8, Should TCMA nvest in the development of a library of resources at TML for ?
purposes of~ ancing its capabilities to respond to members' Information
inquiries? t~lyes (J no
I
9, Should TCMA involve lt&slf to conducting research surveys and generating
related repo or publications on pertinent Issues of importance to the
profession? [yes j no
l~
r`.
5
I,
J
~ w
.
10. If yes, what current issues in your estimation warrant an analysis/study by this
Association?
~AGIL'~Sffl~ MiAOr~ fif /~AI`fi tf ,e+4 i AC"'m _
r ♦ kiiso6i 4ti ft
1 st ~
F
' IV. GENERAL
1. How easy or difficult has it been for you to become involved in TCMA
activities In a meaningful way?
a, f ] very easy
{ b.. easy
[.'somewhat difficult
d. f, ] very difficult
e. [ ] I haven't tried to become involved
2. If you answered the above question Kith a "somewhat difficult" or "very
difficult", will you please indicate what specific barriers have prevented your
involvement.
1 +K. r i &0$ o 401 W.0,4 )f-100 HaY we d
An #Q r.d+gI tha}'i s
ti t fh c Iuj'at ; r '
4 0#40 9 644all! M std serkallc S~e~K;nr(M+frewl.+r/Y
~Ilul i[~L. W~ItlrrL4L r'Aw/Y~~ r
3. What new services would you lUce to see TCMA develop?
E
}s
s"
b
1
l
it
f
4. What in your opinion are the most challenging problems facing our
profession? Please list In order of priority.
1.
f
2.
3.
# 5. How can TCMA be of the most benefit to you in the performance of your
4 j daily professional duties?
t ~
h
I
V. 1CMA
1, Are you } member of ICMA... International City Management Association? {
es (I No 2. If you answered yes to the above question, how satisfied (overall) are you with
! ICMA's services?
[ a. [ very satisfied
b.' [ l satisfied fw► k taeenfhyG t
c, dissatisfied E
d. [ J very dissatisfied
3. If you answered the above question with a "dissatisfied" or a "very dissatisfied", I
will you please explain your answer more fully, I
E I
z 7 _
L
1
4. Should TCMA explore undertaking joint projects . workshops, publications,
etc. with ICMA? [s [ ] no
5. How long have you been an ICMA member? [41ess than 3 years [ ] 3-5 years
[ ] 5-10 years [ more than 10 years
VT. ORGANIZATION
1. In the past twelve months, how much contact (phone, letters, conversations,
meetings, etc. pave you had with the TCMA staff? [ J a great deal some
[I a little [ lone
2. How responsive Is the TCMA staff to your needs?
[ ] very responsive (J somewhat responsive
[ ] not too responsive [ ] not at all responsive
6 3, Addidonal comments:
flit A*0 f~i n4 10 A* $ l
4. In your opinion, how well is TCMA doingg in meeting your overall membership
expectations? excellent good [yJ~fair (1 poor [ ] no opinion
1 I,
5. If you answered the above question with "fair" or "poor", what do you think
TCMA should do to Improve?
,
i
~'a l
i
` i
5.
i
W. PERSONAL
The Information you provide in this section will be
considered confidential and will be used only to assist in
analyzing survey findings.
1. What is your current age?
t [118-22 (J 43.47
23.27 48.52
[r]'L~8-32 53-57
[ ] 33.37 58.62
[]38-42 j ] over 62
2, What is your sex? Gale (j female
f
3. What is your race/ethnic background (check only one)?
Asian [ ] Hispanic
erican Indian (j White
Black [ ] Other (specify)
4, What Is your marital status (check only one)?
[ 1 S gle Separated
( arried Divorced
5. Please Indicate the highest level of education that you have completed
(check only one),
v; O Nigh school
! graduate
Sva graduate study ;
[ j Some college [q lRaster's degree
Associate (2 yr) degree ( ) Doctorate
4 [ j Bachelor's degree
t
6. How many yyears of local government service will you have accumulated as of i
December 31, 1988?
[ } one year years over twenty years
two years ( rive - ten years F
r [ } three years O eleven ~ fifteen years E
O four years sixteen - twenty years
is
9
r;
I
r
N
H
time o period?ifferent positions in local government have you held during that
one [ ] five
[ ] two (j five - ten
((four [ ] more than ten
s S. How many different local governments have you worked for?
[ one (]four
[ j two five
r f I three [ ] more than five
9. How many years have you been in your current position?
i
Prone yeaJ4 m*3 [ j five years (j over twenty years
i j J two years [ ] five • ten years
three years j j eleven - fifteen years
r [ j four years sixteen - twenty yew
14, Please Indicate your current position;
City Manager/Adm. Intern to city government
i [ ] COG Director
City department head [ 1 Consultant
(]professor/educator '
j (J Deputy Asst, City Manager [ J Full-time student
(j Adm. Asst, in city manager's office Private Sector
[ ] Adm. Asst. in city department Other (specify) 0f~ 0%H r, E
11, How many years have you been a TCMA member? I
./tw~yi~ I
rl one year
r (]two years [ ]eleven • fifteen years -
(j three - flue years I I sixteen - twenty years l
l O six - ten years over twenty years
a ~
12, What is the
population of the jurisdiction served by the organization In which
you are currently working?
[ ] over 1,000,000 r
(j 5001000.11000,000 f j 25,000.49,999
[ j 10,000 2500000 [ j 59000 (1 ~A(1$000 249,999 11 2,500.41999
It [ 50,000 - 99,999 under 2,500
t ,
r j
f 10
13, In which TCMA region Is your organization located? (see attached map)
6
[l 2 [7 7
3 [1 8
Ce4 [ ] 9
[15 C110
We may conduct some follow-up interviews to pursue these issues in depth. It you
J` would be willing to participate In the Interviews, please sign your name, and fill in
your title and telephone number, This is optional,
t' Your Name: Ay~~~ 6 i.~s<se N
Your Title: A s s" stAa f f* Kt 14ma .
Your Telephone Number: C ! r7) XVG -1307 `
r k
Please return this survey by Friday, August 261h to;
d
Texas City Management Association
21Aus h 7tbetre Sas 78701{328
i Attn. Program Development Department ~
f
I
Sly
1.
1
Texas Clty Management Association
Regional Map of Texas
i M,r Nru •weM dl~, BMW
j Vlhl~ !4~ K~' YY I'1 .IMYi
]]Ij` sw 1 s~~u u..e+ r! win
1
sY rr .'+~i Yr~~Y wn 11~r
~ /..w w~N rrY rwr r. ✓
w\ ur Y.1 yw ~n.n unr ..iwl.
CK ALx1~ ~JY(1 Itl1H M/IY Y~Y i1[4. 1+ wy
rY,r Nrl .w. ~W 1 4 3 ~wY 0 , r.r Y.. ~ 'rnYl. ~ l • ~ y~
r«I rrwM.N Y>/. rµ r« "s't' 1'IVr ~I ^ ~ ~ ~Yr.w
rr
r
IY«r I.Y• rw ,fir •1~Y u.,..Y w1w iYi, ~ ..N1rY. f ~ 1
IWO'
.w Yrr r'r ~d rv •M.1 urr. / Yrwr I
OVA
rrr NY r rr r N.r ~ ~ rel~\. iw1 rr, YMIIi1 .ir / }
w'r ~y/.w try ~ Mw► ~
11w ruw. Yw1 MY' wrl rW Iw/ w ..I
Mw /y rrn .Iw ~Iw r,rr 1 a r'
'LJ~ \M MNw 1 A II.
I.YI rr
MAIN
u1W ~NYw yy YY 'r y'. I.W ♦ V «~ti r
MMMI
rlr'r Y,.. M,
LIB/( WY .WI
rw MN
NIY NMI WrM
1 E..
~~i rrYYl )jt
H1 YYM IMII.I` MM"
WI .YYy r~Y,..11 w w ~ M~ ' }I}}
\rW
I&W
1Q
IwY NYr l:
1
f
r`<
a
T
M
i CfrYol DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 8UlLWNG / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
DATE: October 27, 1983
SUBJECT; USER FEE RATE INCREASES
Attached is a revised User Fee Survey which includes the recommendations
of city staff, advisory boards and David M. Griffith and Associates
consultants for your review. An ordinance will be presented at the
November 1, 1983, 6;30 work session for you to discuss before formally
approving new fees in the 7;00 p.m. council meeting.
The survey includes only those fees which are required to be in an
established ordinance. Special contractual agreement charges will be
t considered during contract negotiations. Those not included in the
ordinance are county and small cities ambulance per capita rates,, f
recreation program contract classes, animal control fines established by
f the municipal judge, and street cuts previously approved by the council
to provide ;196,004. Excluding these types of charges, the Griffith
f study recommends an increase of ;489,268 in additional revenue. The city
staff and advisory boards recommend an increase of #335,282 in new 3
revenue with the adoption of fee increases.
f Special contractual agreement charges will be considered during contract
negotiations. The following is a list of fees included in the Griffith
study, but not in the ordinance for your approval;
i REASON EXCLUDED
AMOUNT REVENUE SOURCE FROM ORDINANCE
11, a Cites Ambulance ontract negotiated again in
Per Capita Charges Spring, 1984
56,613 County Ambulance Per Contract Ncootiation, increased
Capita Charge October 1, 1983 from $2.00 to
52.20 per capita. Budget set f
for 1983-84
I ; 36,848 Recreation Program Individual Personal Services
Contract Negotiations
Contract Classes
2,331 Animal Control Municipal Court Judge sets fines
Citations
i
t
T_
User Fee Rate Increases
Page Two
AMOUNT REVENUE SOURCE REASON EXCLUDED
FROM ORDINANCE
I $195,131 Street Cuts Rates ppreviously approved by
Counci],
$ 49819 Tax Certificates Rate Set by State Legislature
$ 1,868 Tax Appraisal District Contract Negotiation with staff
Charge recommending no charge for _
service although consultants
recommend $1,8611 fee.
$ 52,493 Airport Contract Negotiation '
$ 80609 Williams Square Parking Lease Rate Approval by
Resolution
$368,232 TOTAL
The following table outlines the amount of increased revenue by -
department if new fees are approved by an ordinance:
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION REC~MENO CONSULTANT'S STFBOARD*
Fire
-
9 00
Library 82,862 260
Parks and Recreation 29,788 120200
3
Plan. & Comm. Develop. 1209942 101,564**
:
Police .20,583 20483
Public Works 1250461 109,886
TOTAL 4890268 3350262
*No Board for Fire and Police Departments
"Board recommends five year phase-in period
As reflected in this table the major difference in the coltsultant's
recommendation and staff/bosrd suggestions are in the areas of Fire
Library, Parks and Recreation, Planning, and Public Works, The following f
analysis explains the reason for the difference by department. f
FIB
}
3 The consultants recommendation of a $44.00 'flat charge for each
inspection failed to recognize time involved in different types of
i inspections. As a result the staff recommends a system based on building
size and type of inspection.
I
l
I I
User Fee Rate increases
Page Three
LIBRARY
The consultants recommended for non-city users of the library a $3.69 per r
item charge which would create $130,862, or an additional $82,862 if the
city wanted full recovery of cast, or a payment from the county of
$172069. According to the Texas State Library, the city cannot charge
Denton county users for this service while the county subsidizes the
library. The library board recommended a $36 fee to non-Denton County
library users with the understanding that if this $35 fee were charged to
all non-city users approximately $200000 would be raised. Presently the
library receives $48,000 from the county. The library board recommended
against the $3469 per item charge for non-city users, since people would
still be able to attend programs, use reference services, without paying
for these services, and a per item charge of $3.69 per item would curtail
use resulting in less revenue overall.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Athletic league team participation charges, and practice costs were
maintained below the consultants recommendations. The board's
recommendations on individual swimming fees were also lower than the
consultants. Swimming fees were increased this past year from $,50 to
$,75 for children and the proposed $1,00 charge was approved by a 3-2
vote. Cemetery fees were held lower than those recommended by the
consultants causing $7,538 less in revenue increases.
PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEYELOPMBT
The board recommended implementation of new fees over a five year
period. The difference in revenue was caused by plat and zoning charges
varying with the amount of land being considered rather than flat fees as
recommended by the consultant. A historic landmark designation fee
I remains unchanged based on the staff and board recommendation.
PUBLIC WORKS
I
The rabies investigation charge of $134 by consultant recommendation
r j would reduce the number of requests resulting in a health hazard, thus a
! char a of $26 for investigation and $5 holding charge is recommended by
stag. This would create $170281 less than the consultant's charge.
The major purpose of the Griffith study was to identify the actual costs
of delivering city services and proposing fees to meet these costs. User I
fee increases will allow the city to hold property tax rates down by
providing a more equitable means of financing certain municipal
services,' Many city services do not benefit the ppublic-at-large and a
user fee allows the recipient to pay a share of'tha cost. li
Copies of the boards' minutes considering these items will be distributed
f at the 5;30 p,m. meeting.
3
' ! l
;
e
Assistant City Manager
i
fah
1458M i
i
1
r
i 1
SURVEY RESULTS--USLR CHARGES AND PERMIT FEES 10/27/93
DEPARTMENT CURRENT CONSULTANTS STAFF FT, GRAND
SON
I ' LEES REC, REC, ADDISON ARLINGTON_ DALLAS NORTH GARLAND PRAIRIE IRYING LENISYILLE _MESi1UtTE PLA#10 RICHARD
Par Private Prlvat Private N/C res i
I t1lnt i 70.00 70,00 10.00 -0- Cont. 85.00 Cont. 50,00 Cunt. 60,00 60,00 60,00 66100 60.00
for non-
resident
Cost per I j
j206.19 _w-_
F r! - - - - -
Ins -G' 44.00 -0- -0- RR R .0- -0- -0- .0- -0- .0_ .0_
. I
Annual
i Char
q!
based on- }i
sq# ft. 3
6 3
00160-10 16100
2,000 30,00
12.000-244 60.00
24,000-abov 100.00 s
Aut" t t
1
system
Install. q
Inspedt. I
New I 50.00 E
s Charged~torl
f
t
t
:
i.
ti
1
:
I
1
1 SURVEY RESULTS--USER COARGES AND PERMIT PM I
l0/27/DJ
EPARTMENT CURRENT CONpEC1ANf5 STAPP f t. GAAND _ _ -
- - _ AECr AOD15tlN ARLINGTON DALLAS kURll! OARLAUO PRAIRIE IllVINO I.ENISYIt f LEE PLANQ NSCNAADSOy-
lA
ulan,~e,
] pper Private Prfval PPlaate N/C res
Patient 70,00 10,00 70.DO -0- Cont, 88.00 Cont. 60,00 Cont. 60.00 66,00 60,00 66.00 60.00 ~
for mom-
resident
Cest per. j i
~206.f9 i
t
r`c"
wo.- .0. 44.00 -0- .0- kA ti •O- -0- -0- -0- -.0- •6- .0-
Annual
CRero
base9d on 1
ft, I
0.6000 16.00 ~
6001-12 000 30.00
000-Alox) 60.00
I 24,000-abov 100.00 _
6rtlr~g. ~
System
Instail~ i
Inspect.
~~yy f
fCantra4tor! 60,00
therged) I F
!
t
t ~
i
i
i
t
)
f
i
I i~
u
j SURVEY RESULTS--USER CHARGES AND PERMIT FEES 2
I l0/27/RJ
' LLPAR:T1WK:NT CURRENT CONSULTANTS STAFF FT. GRAND FEES REC. RECI ADDIM ARLIN0ION UfTLLAS WORM GARLAIID II IRVINLLE-
LSQUITE ANO [Ul jIAROMY
;
Annual
Inspect,
lowner
charged) 26.00
asoline
and Lp0
link
Install.
Inspec.
(contra toi
harpe 60100 ~
Sprlnkler
System I!
nstsll, I
nspec ~ '
f (contratof
hargedl 60.00
Standpipe
System
Install.
InsycG,
Icontrac10 1 6D.00
* Ft. North Is proposing a Fire Inspection fee based on square footage with a $16.00 mfnIM charge.
a'Dallas will be proposing a fee structure to the rngncil very soon, It is based on high rl$e structures mainly at $120.00 per call,
Ambulance-Smell titles per capita contribution,wn deleted from survey since It is based on a contractual charge end not ordinance. s {
--County contrl~U Ivp per cappfta wee deleted f~om s0rveyf 31nce tlifs is baseduq a recommendation to an ambulance comafttoe for contract 1
. negotiet on w h tho next hecomnenda Ion to a dAterm ned n too Spring, 1904,
AAmm6bulance Collections 19 estimated to be $61,206.
Fire inspection--Stsff recommendation revenue Is estimated to be $90,900,
Oriffith's revenue estimate Is $109,622,
i
~ f
I
t
I
I
j'
.
`.J
J
i_
f
1
SURVEY ABULIS-45CA CHARGES AND PERMIT FEES 10/27/OJ
LIDRARY 9/30/O3
EPARiT1ENT CURRf'"11 SULTANTS S1AFF#
FEEAEC, EC, ADDISON ARLINOIUN DALLAS F1,NU11111 GARLANO GRAIIII-PNAIIIIE -IRVINO LENISVILLE MES UQ ITfLANRICIJARUSON
eiand y per 26,OG .0- 2B, W
fromc arge Item per year 0- Fer }tcM
lid per fam lyer
Dallas service family,
Per -0,60 Y•0- Card _ . -
16 Card -•U- Books
Ikem only Card
Items only
Denton 6,0 only 2,00 for l
County 55 ■ 16M film
Resident IO,GO 6.00 for
76 M equlpmeht
1p5,00 protector
1000 Ib ?-,r
4
Non- 25 tw 36,00
County ennuall 3065 year
resident per per Item por
family family G- p, 0" G-vf
l
- *0oard recommendation same. as staff.
s
A 1J.65 per Item charge for non-clty resldonto will create 1130,862 In revenue according to consultant,
A 335 per family charge to non-city residents would create approximately 120,000 In annual revonuo comparod to the current W,Coo allocated by
the county
I A 135 per family charge to non county residents would create approximately $076 In aunual revenue,
1314M
1
1
i
I
i
i
{
I
i
i
1 'r
10/21/03
6URYCY RCSUI.IS--IISCR CHARM'S MO Pf.IIMIT f11:S
PAMYS AND RCCRtATIOM
111
btiHTUN!S
CORK 011T11' CONSULTA"11 ODARO
rCES COSTS PLC, Arc, OI11Sall ARIINOTON DUL rT.HOR H OAIILANI OR.PRAIRII: IRYIIIR LTWISYILLC f1CS 1 C PLAl10 I1ICRARDSON
fIItCTIC
CAGUM `
Ppr team 20.0t1 01.25 40.00 30.00
'111W IC 3
ItlN1Al51
Per Tourn
Session J0.110 3J;00 33.00 6,00/hr
unligghted
1u,11O/hr
j 11911(ed
I
ATH4CTIC
1 PRhCllf,11
t. r rvu. Per II611t 10,00 16.46 15.00 6,OOlhr N/A 5.25 1,60/2hr 6.IIU/hr 2,00/11r 6,00/hr 2.50/hr G, 00 SG/hr R/C
unllghlec liryhted I5. 00121hr /0 Ilryhts 1,60/hr
IO. 5.00/hr II(IRod
0' ;'0" OUed /lights
-ND -1v I M-
'WMHt11N0 f
AOMI5510N1
Wind .15 t.10 1.00 11.00 N/A ,1'r .25 .40 1100 ,15 .25 .15 1100 1.00 1.00 i
Adult 1.106 2126 1,50 1,00 1,00 1.60 1101) 1100 1,00 .50 15 t.nD 1.00 I.Un
Sr, Adult .15 1.00 1100
5oa, PESS 26.00 25,60 26,00 N/A M/A R/A ICi.nO H/h 15.110 H/A 10.011 I6,011 20,00 10.00
ram, Pass 6U.00 60.00 60.00 N/A N/A N/A 10.00 N/A N/A !!/A II /A 60.00 N/A N/A ;
1Where no comparisons are mado, those epics are not Involved in th„ activities. !
11The Orard has reservali0es cuncorning this fee.
1
I
a
I
6: 1
I
f
j
L
r
r
I;
J
;t;
1 ,
SUIiVf.Y IIESIII.IS--USER CRAItUS AIIII PlIVI Ei:CS 10/27/83
PARKS M!b 11101A1 1011
bCIII oil ' S
CUIMUIT OUIT0111S C011SULTAl{15 DOARb
IUS C0515 RUC, IICC ADD ISON ARLINGTON OAI LAS I'1 10111 GARLUD IIn.11TAlltll i IRViIID LFNISVILLC IVCSIIUIIC ht ,A110 IiICIlARI1SUtl
CCMCTERIES: i
Nonresl-
donl Lot 200,00 43,46 480,00 300,00
per year
1 Rosidan6
Lot 150,00 43.48 360,00 250,00
per year '
Infant
i Lot 50,00 120100 15,00
r
Uncrelo
Mork 10,00 25100 25,00 I
Inler• I 4
i nlellt
permit I0,00 25,UD 25.00
Ust,ablislment of the proposed (nos would goncrotc additional onnual revonoos ofI
Praposod Fees board Racpmaiandod pees `
A1fILETIC tCAWLS f 2,3r6,0U f 1,20U,00
ATNLUTIC RENTALS 421,oU 5U0 00
AtHLVIC PRA01CC 01060,00 3, CU.00
INDIVIDUAL SWIMMINO ADMISSIONS 94403,00 G,noo,00 t
CCHUTCAICS 30. 00 ~2,000.f1O j
1 PARKS 6 RCOREATION $29,18n,00 k12,200,00
I
1
1
I I
t 1
,
i
i
f
i
SURVEY RESULTS-MER CIIAROES AND PERMIt FEES" G
r
10/27/03
~ w~
EPAgfNENT CiIRgCh? CONSULTANTS STAFF - ` -
{
IiS C E UI,aN AgL1NOf N OAI.LAj Ft NO I" FAKOAQjAND QANO PRAIRIE IRViNO LEVfISYILLE Nf,5QUi1[ pLAN0~g1C11AADSOr
PLA
ANDNC"
Platt
Initial
Plot 65.00 66o,o0 100.001 26,00 10,00 160,00 160,00 0,0660.00 16,00/ 10 OU Moo 60,00 10,00 100.0 40,00 i
I 400.00 .01/
+1,00 +3,00 +2,00/1 t 41,00 +4,00 ar/42,00
;
acre ec/ 2.00 760,00
- 46,00/n oI
s N1Plat ncN6 0V
Ithoot
Off. 110,00 13Uo,00 160,004 '9.6,00 100,00 160.00 160.00 0.00 140,00 Same 100,00 10,00 loV,UU Sa
300,0 + 60,00
Re let In
1 h 160, bU*
f notlf. 110.00 1300.00 I30o,O0 26,00 Sam 150,00 160,00 U.Uo 100,00 Some 100,00 10,00 100,00
;are
Foe
/owner 2,00 23.OD 4,00 1.00 1,00 4,00 3,00 0,0 1,00 3,00 2.00 1.00 4.0 2400
Ming
Changes JOD I
~ 11,D)
) ~
less than 160,00 260,00 600,00 100,00
6 acres 200,00 116,00 176,00 300,00 460,00 060,00 760,00 +1,00/ c 200,00 2100000 I
UU.W 10,00 76,00 +6,00 IMDD I
more then ~II
1200 00
S Acres 260,00 416.00 1000,00 600,00 460.0V to 1000100 100,00 400,00 6 200,00 160.00 A 76,00 Sam 126100
2000,00 4 200,00 46400/ c 600,00
Spec, 12.0
700,00 116.00 116.00 426,0 100,00 260,0 0.00 Same Some U, 0 Same 16 W 160 OU 126,00
Istoole
LsndwarkS 26.-60 17.6,00 26100 0100 U.00 MOO Sam 0100 0000 0,00 0100 0100 20100 0100
*Less than 3 lots or Iasi than I acres
10nssultant recommended 120,94e,
totf Rec"mauded 1101,664.
COM I ttee recommendation some as Staff but based an five year phase In perlod, for $101,664 If fully Imulemonted Inmmllnlniy. j
I 1
' c
I
j.
i
s
`I
II
f
1
j
I
sunvaY lu:nllr;rg - ur;rh calnnnf;rl nnu rl:m+rr vrlsn 7
I .10/27/83
GU11pLY77' C~M1tl61,TANTO a7ntY _ _ _ -
crnaTHr,NT rrrm nt~, annun Irwln
PIX. _ _n0l1--18011 -AftLIgU1CNl -,I?ALLn9 VI', hY7ntll UnnLntlrl, ~•IV1lrttlr. .IIIV1Ull Vfhl.Ij._ IIL7;(~I'~7g tLAIlO alrnhnUDa
Npttllnt Y,SU/ 'f, SO/ 7,5tl/ IS bd ~
Servlr+n 7,56 2A, 50 50 f,5,Otl' 25,00' 7,50 25,60 29,60 hood
16.66 25,06 25, Oft none noon Inn
1
roil ii to I
A5 Mln, 9,6tl 12,00 12 OU nn runt fool,- 7
nu nn l.e nOLn nn nn ❑n lira Wl no
90 Mln, 14, b0 2A, 00 24400 n1111r90 elmt(10 A! IIN elinnln nhnrgn nlinrgo ahm nn dhnlge clu+rg0 ahntlgn
-
nuuldent
0rfnnnn nrn
aetwlrt 2, OA tool.-
. .L t10 J, 00 2,00 2100 2. no 2,00 2100 J,On 21 no 2100 nntn
_ sl 3.00 2100
vehicle
tlq,ound 13150 1J, 50 1J,5f1 edmih adm on h+ n0inln n+ nu no
fnn foe n 110 ndmin nclmilr ndmiu ndmin ndmlu ndn~irl nAmin
rnn _ fnn _fni,._ . _..f,~h___. _ fnn ._fnn N i
c
NnCYnhtntlrvlcOM MnYkOd 01,501M .00 I11d1nnlnn4'1,56 present for, F25,bu fro (u be uhnrfnd nltnr e Clly m'dlnrtnnrt lit p+nnnnd,
F
t[salJae only eondlwtn funnrnt onnuetn for pollen oftlearn prlvnL,%hunlnmlano oro ilcmlxe by the pollen hopnrlmnuE rnr nil OUn't 0n11001n,
2turt North bl n not nnndlwt hlnnrnl ear0rln, rrl!mta noml+nnlen parforn Llin uarnrbu nn4 mtlnl: how, n 1+eredl„ tnllan liinlmNt nneorF vahlnl0u nt n
uhnr4e of ;
01100 pnrvghfaln,
1
j82,00 for fiat A pognn IwheLllnr 1 rnpOrL nr A nnpntnte I-OpOrLni. 5,27 per pogo Llrnrenftor.
I
tOWIslrKht of 1116 rrepnsed foes Wild 9en0rete Militlnual ennnal r0vehtrns of!
Cnnsullont t Staff Ines
N6rrenl4 fees dl2t
to"r!I tsturts tAJy
Atcldt+nt A offense nets, qtly
Yehlt n fMplmnlMlenis 11!<26
1nIAL 205AJ
pp' f
l
r
r
6
1
7
t
l
I I
Rr{ a' -
'
h
13
BURYNY NF:B ULTN--IIA PJ{ CIIAR(1197 AND I'BRNIT YNP9U 10/?1/!33
IiNIW1~A -
)ePAR'1}IeN7' CURRENT tt7NBULTA
I
N BTAt'!'
c
JWCL boltlON f42 H-~wgf1tOARLA~ Lf 1HVrLLNHN4!41TN 1 W) irate Rec -i+ . _ . Vnrlee
Moral 4154 120 120 0 115-12420-Aso $10-430 sli 125 15-515 110-$20 -0-
"tral
I rMpound Ie~,so Sua.o OIl3
i
Mall k
{ orals 12 17,75 14 /31day 12/dny 42/dey SJ/Jay $3/day -0- -0- 11/day. $2/dny A3/dny
nlMeie /3 Ap,6J 16 N/A 14/dey 'J2/dny SS/day .$s/dny. 0°
loathe} Y Wdey N/A
OP
Opt [on 610 JAli Ittl~ 15-525 $14 1354,10 N/A _ A1•S10 513 $2-510 $10 - -
fuel Cost 190,71 15••129
litfisliasta
rt
eeide,tl 11,11 -0- -0- -b- -P- N/A -U- -0 -0-
bn- _tl
r I eeidente $10 110 N/p N/A 0- N/A -0- N/A U- N/A 1+/A N/A
'
{ prnaen
etrleval 55. 19.19 55 -0- $10 N/A $5 -a- .0_
IMpeund
t n y 12 -o-
05 N/A 52 161 15 110,50- 0- 11/dey 52/dey tG
p4 t" _ _ I1J/dny
!e Ware -0-- 413 120
'W.09 VAYyI See AthcWomt h
i
h
r
i
i
j
1
r
r.
i
i
W
NURVUY Hf:NUJIM--UOF;N CIIANUns ANU I'f;NNIT pnN8 to
Pun I,I tt,1151~ l rN0 1~ tlNMIL U ['-H I IL irfv14 e
~1 ' pI-A-NQ Unneukered
dN/A N/A Neukei'ed - N/A spayed
0. Y /2 H/A dJ 10 11y N/A
I - N/A /A sl
3
~~tellna 010,00 PION 12,00/day al Cenkor
aenlne - 1]4,00 plUe 12,On/day at
Canker
E
h f
~ i
I
i
1
C
to%2t/oa
BllgN;Y HPAULTB--UOF.A CON(" AND PrHAIT r6PS
)CpAnTNBNT UqnF,NT r:UN3UIRANT$ STAYr U dgl3lU_PRRIg1C_, INVINU, LGN IBVI LIAR M66QV ['fF~ ~'~.ANJ glCI1ANU8DN
Cr sa ....HMO RCC, _ I~U_U I$~1~, M,L~N .417'03 DAL1.~9 LTL"TJi UJ~It4P{I
awc
B
loot
'
fts
7.50 317 410 . 6$1020 O ILO A Value !10 $10 M L4~k-PeL 110 ~^Value named L $5 N 125 Ain
~
fn Yee !20 AC ILS C of NorM 120 U fixture $ ~v, of Notk Cxempio AlLar I175 Mex
♦ 1 tau Conga ~4 VO Min $551-SON IM e I
//Bldg ~dd_ 1$1 for me x1=014 Value named Val
15lN ur Vet Add-elo. oood e1 59,AA pu a ee I
!5 Cots 1 x coot/job 10-4334 $225
.013 &LA
$10 per U 1N-IM named 1
$15 $q rt +$BOetc t
}
eft-gemldentSn i
qe-Inep 7.30 . $13 110 15 ~ 420 410 15 $15 13 15
i
rem
,tlutiete D.16 6.50 $5 _
_
Ter Outle! J 30 .20 V~ _ _ - - {
7171 1nex! a • IS .
' ~rer outlet
over SO .06 .10 .06
~
OS OS _ -
per haw .04
I
i
1
I
i
i
I
i'
=j
i
1
1
A
t HUPVVY MUMS-USER CHARIIrm AND PIMMIT FHM
1 kPAR7Mwir ''URRP.NT CONSULTANTS NTAPP -
,."E'1S8 RSCu_ RCC,_ AUD1801i_ AHtr1NOMt b~LLAB Y.itQljTj1 UARLANU On ANn_S'x IN1n lHV}Ills -I,BHIR VI.LLR HF.nUU27- PI.AMJ AILNAAU90N
H1 IC - - -
i k9
1e~lt
raft
in Yee 7.50 11~ 110 110 on 110 R Value 010 010 R Rymodl11-Pee 010 Hee-/slue Raeod 1 $5 H $21 min
020 rC 015 C of work 020 C (ixturo 0 r of Work kxaarle @IIU 0175 max
1 + i New Cone 114 W min 0551»56N Nmeo!1 geNAda
after 1/Hldg Md 701 for ea 90.016 Yell a Hated -Val '
$5m Val Add-eta. Remoggl Ctel u exec
g2" 1 x Wat/job 1043m 1225
01) Apt4 •160 Comm
010 Pet U JM-IOH nneod 1
015 eq rt VOSbetc
R-Renidentln
i 'C-tberweroiel i
Ne-IneP 7.50 ~ IlJ Iltl 115 020 ~ 010 05 015 05 d9
31jj pet 1y 25.75 020 ~
,}t Outlets 1.75 6050
,377 Per Outlet
11 nett 75 .15 SO 20
Pet OUtlet
aver 10 06 .10 .06 j
Pam UO
i
Pet up ,oi ,05 ~ ..04
' I
t
c
I
I
f ~
j.
12
!0/27/03
BVHVBY RFBULTA--UBBR CINpr S ✓iNb PAIUrIT P1M
TMKNT CURAP,NT WNBUIMMIS NTAMt'
Pggg pgC, _REV, P~qDJSON
_RRLINUTUN DALI,AB__PT__- _,NUATI (IARf ANU URIUIU PNA INIP IHVINO Lt~WI8 V1 LN lIN9 7'8 PLJ NU ~ll'EII~HW',D,tf„_rrltet A 41 Is, 25 dA
,
k FKA
wit 46 ,15 11.30 dl
rites
3 'itault
ver 50 .30 55 .40
I or Iqn
Irault 95 $1,10
,arge F Ihp ,
lore
per k0tot V _ - E
Stet 1 $3.15 $6.50 of W44'r
vet 3 01.50 $2,79
Mall
1
Filet S
ver 5 ~0 .55
i
a
5
I'
i,
I
a
a 1
WIN
13
OUNVAY RESULTS--USRR CHARM AND PRRNIT FRES 117/21/03
r CN1VN+g
-l SPANVMT CURACNT C MULTANTS STAFF
~Ng _ }~Cr I~Y,~ ~U INO ,L_LLmgr-1 -ML IAS FT~WGR,I I UI~jI.ANU tlfiANIf SIR V._ INVIH(3 LE.WIBVILLR B9Olll'Cp _PIJQW` RFCIWlU80H
w /
1fr1C
m b ka I10 $50,59 $50.59 $5 $5 N/C N/C $10 + 2l of 115 N/C N/C $A Rea 110
$2 SN New CORgt L'oal $20
lgn
F! B F Bgtt 150 E1u.F! !?q.Ct $9 19 160 120
YatMlka 110 $29.'18 BgYt 120 @ UMW
AM $15 0-50$35 -200-100 1$- $20 0-l.$$1 - P-$9,50 Alum
Nod$25 100$15 -600-IW 300-415 18- $21 $65
{ Lar$50 200$65 -601 l5d ako eto
I _ HB 1100 _
1 ,aftlF. I
ouPalwY 110 11$.39 ISA,39 120 120 $10 $10~ 120 15 125 N/C120~r~ _$90 $25
,
i t
5
t
C Ef
1
i
h
,
f'
1
1
14
S nUNVRY aP.gU11M-~U6gk CIIAkOPS AND PRANIT 11Cn8 10/?.r/03
IIKPARTNkxIT WRARNT LUNRULTAM" 9TNVV
.`FPJ RRC. ^r~ _ n1R01 t7A GALLAb ~rNb TI_ UARt.ANb t1NANb PkA1kIR ]q _LaV„_L6 M98gll_1'f
ibllgLlU _ l S ~ .§N1L
~F.,_ pt,__ ~n~CN1Wb9UN .
axe
Rnglneering
iI{ frost
rain.
+ ProfeoEe .OF .072 1072 Cone NAPE 751 eAlery R No Ane 1109ular Cann TSPR- 8-101 Cons atrglghE
Erg Curves ARCR 1,23... No Charge good Curve h In-{Ouse Only (ialary x
ALI Cons Curve 9 - 61 Proj or NC 110 multi.
Charges Rngineers 251-Cog All Chsr C,rwern TM-Conn ~,llsr effoat
All Cher. Cone Belery in llou e
NO .In
.
Ilou He
R)ra I I
Proj
All char
Hater
and
Royer S
Prajeoks .05 106 ,06 i
Per
Indivld
$2 No Ann t3 No An
e $2.10 No Anr No Ana $3
from 611ding No Anr printer goals
spa 11-13. 11.91 1ipbf-Irl(irmootott
r
NSPE-4atfonal Sonfety of PrOf8S§10ba1 tnylneers
ASCE••fuaerican Society of CIYII Engineers
TSPt-4oxas Seclety of Profasslonal Englbears
I
z
I h~
1
j7
1 k I'
I
1
I
_ I
!i
:
i
•
i
f;
'IF MW -Iwm~
I
A
15
9URVRY REOUrM -USER CIIARUEO AND PHRHIT FRO
r
i
gOARI"MT CUIIlIENT CONAUVANTS 97AFr
~xC.. _.ItPic4,_, A_o0 DO AAIA 11SK UALI.AS r.N( nrTI !LLM U _ ,(IAAND PIU11R19 1RVIlw LF.NI9VILl.E liMI1T eJ4A1?O , . NICYNRD30N_
f ~ tVe
t
ater
Ie and
bewee
!Napa (190} $25 $049.60 $950
4011me ad at eet oral age Frbieote !h all oltlee
derrloadt,
lnapeo -D- 115.82 $16
t
DOW of
AdjUat 150 1100 $100 CC 31n0 IIN Vol Appl$100 115 $35 $50 CC 110 150 125
6115 Con13100
5N-'20K Comrt1150
$250 9pec$200 1
Perk 110.0250
1150+
- perk op
Need - _ i
Cutting 31! 151.62 151.62 Health Admin Admin Admtn Admin mown to Ileelth Ilealth Olds Health Ilea) th
Dept 150 + 156 t 1260 + 375 + Cycles Crept oept Oept. Dept
IOD-Nr HONIhg Newtng Howing Cheeged RY
Coat COAL Coot 94 Ft
110.00 Acre
2M-IOM 621
r0-15N 330
19-212! 339 r
I
i
I
I
f
r
r
16
t BIIR VP.r RY.RUJIJ'n--U9Nk UIIANOrlI ANII FT,IVIIT F[;xn IO/27/tl3 eHTONIB
I etM-r" T I:URRENT CnNeULTANTB nTArF
! ry qeC~ _ key, ~LUIBOI~ LINO v_N _ll_ gI~iJ10 rT:y~~J11T11 O~ylgl,(~N11 URAnUAI~I ~M IkVINtl Ll:H1BVILLC M ES ITS_ hIJyNU _ ,_I1IC U
ON
PUBLIC - - - - - -
~ B
JunN
4bhtala
Ilnwual -0~ 125 ;ZS
Mobile
` f Home
Inspaa
j Per Park - $50 ;]0180 ;201.
Par Stand. 11.10 ;4.10
Plat rat .0_ 0-
! I
I
i. Other c!tlas not surveyed d0 a different system fer foe charges.
letal additional revenite for Public Works will hat
CqNSULI~ §TAIT ~CCONf1EN0ATION !
1 Animal Control $ 42;7i 6 36. !
Engineering 36,610 36,610
InspeetloJl 66 639 GG A )
I MAI ~126,4G1 f1119,Rtl5 1
f J
rF
l
e
I .
_ 111
1
I
ti
SURVEY OF USER CHARGES, PERMIT FET;S
(feel free to enclose schedules, tables, etc. as
opposed to providing information in each space below)
k Dog Licenses/Pound Fees
Animal Registrations Unneutered, unspayed animals $5,00
Neutered, spayed animals $3,00
i
ANIMAL IMPOUNDMENT
I 1 .v
i Class A.
3 First Impoundment $ 20.00
Second Impoundment $ 30.00
Third Impoundment $ 45,00
i Fourth Impoundment $ 67,00
Class R: '
Pirst Impoundment 27,
Second Impoundment 00
t Third Impoundment 40.00
Fourth Impoundment $ 60,00
$ yo,r,o ~ f
s C,
First Impoundment $ 34,00
Second Impoundment s0 00
Third Impoundment 75, 00
Fourth Impoundment p113.00 l
Class Ds
First Impoundment
$ 34x00 ` f
Second Impoundment 50.00
Third Impoundment 75,00
Fourth Impoundment 1113.00
x
1-
~ Food liondl~~r's Permits
New Application s
s $50,00.
( Restaurants, snackbars $ 20.00 plus $2.00 per table, 1
{ etc. $100,00 maximum
Food hand'lers' card $10,00 +
k
j
r
Y1 i
I.
I
I
Filing Fees (for filing concept plans, site plans. plats, etc.)
Initial Plat
Fewer than 3 lots or fewer than 5 acres $100,00
Other $325.00
Re2lat (without notification)
Fewer than 3 lots or fewer than 5 acres $150,00
Other $650,00
keplat (with notification) a
Fewer than 3 lots or fewer than 5 acres $150,00
other $650,00
zoning Retest Fees
Fewer than 3 lots or fewer than 5 acres 400,00
Other 11500.00
Specific Use Permit $400,00
Historic Landmarks $ 2S. 00
Subdivision Ordinance Vari
ante $ 75.OC
s
Fence Permits (for erecting fences)
We do not have such a requirement. s
Swimming Pool Permits (construction of pools)
ii Public Pool (no charge to City) $120,00 `
( Semi-Private Pool (motels/apartments) $100,00
jl,n Permits c
0 50 square feet $ 15100
51 100 square feet 20,00
101 - 200 square feet 25.00
j, 201 300 square feet 30,00 i
30) 400 square feet 50,00 }
401 S00 square feet $100.00
501 square feet $150,00
t
Buirdin (Construction) Permits (indicate if separate fees are
~
lequ re for. we`ie "ctrTc,T permits, plumbing permits, heating/
air conditioning permits),
_.y
Certificate of Occupancy
$28,00
S
2y
I
Inspections
i
Board of Adjustment fee $50,00 1w i
Total-Valuation Fees
$ 1 500 $ 5
$ 501 - $ 21000 $ 5 for first $500 plus $1
for each additional $200 or
fraction thereof to and
I including $2,000
I
$ 2tool - $ 2510001 $ 20 for the first $2,000
plus $d for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof,
to and including $25,000
$ 25,001 $ 50,000 $112 for r.he first $25,000
plus $5 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof,
to and including $50,000.
$ SO,OU1 - $100,000 $187 for the first $50,000
plus $2 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof, }
to and including $100,000
$100,001 - $500,000 $287 for the first $100,000
plus $1.50 for each
additional $1,000 or fraction
thereof, to and including
$500,000
$500,001 and up $887 for the first $500,000
plus $1 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof
{
The fee for reinsPection shall be $15.00
To figure building permit fee for all new construction and
additions, mu]tlply $ll,`OO times total square feet, Then enter that {
valuation into above schedule and increase results by 50 percent,
To figure building permit fee for alterations fee damage, repairs,
remodeling and accessory buildings, multiply i'~6,50 times total
i square feet, Then eater that valve tion into the above schedule and
Increase results by 50 percent,
1
Moving Permits (movjL~Lhouses and other structures ~
1 1/4 cent's per square foot
,j
i
Solicitor's License (Peddler's License)
$10,00 if product is produced in the state
No charge for products produced out of state
a Irrigation Permits (installation of sprinkler systems)
(Automatic Extinguishing System Installation)
New Inspection (Contractor charged) $50,00
Annual Inspection (Owner charged) $25.00
Traffic $ Stree~tSigns (reimbursement by developers or others
or installation f street name signs, traffic signs, etc.)
No reimbursement required
I
Swimming•Fees Admission to City-operated pools)
1
s See "Recreational Fees" on page S.
s
Tennis Fees (admission to or use of City orated ternis courts)
Charge after 6 p.m.
$1.00 per person for 1 1/2 hours - 18 years and over
75 per person for 1 1/2 hours - Senior citizen
75 per person for 1 112 hours ° Under 18 years of age
i
Library Fines (oye'rdue materials)
.10 per working day for overdue books r
$1,00 per working day for art prints, video movies, sculpture, I
video games
Patron Use of Libraries
Non,Denton County resident $35.00 annually
S
Electricians'. Exam and Certification Fee i
Exam Renewal
Muter $100. 00 }faster $ 20, 00 f
Journeyman $ 20.00 Journeyman $ 5.00
5
1
.4.
,
Recreation Fees
t; «w
Athletic Leagues per team $30100
Athletic Rentals per tournament session $ 5.00/hour unlighted
$10.00/hour unlighted
Athletic Practice per practice S100/hour unlighted
`10,00/hour unlighted
Individual Swimming Admission
` Child eP 75
f Adult $ 1.00
Senior Citizen Adult 1.00
Season Pass 1.5100
Family Pass 160.00
Service Charge on Re-t~rned Checks
{ $10,00
i Emergency Alarm Permits anti/or Charges for Resp~nding_to_False Alarms ;
Fire calls no charge
FaUae alarm fire calls - no charge E
i
Wrecker Service Franchise/Fees
i
Junk vehicle removal $25,00 E
,
Sale o£ Me s or Other Printed Materials
Per Individual Map $2,00
water and Sewer Maps (Book of Maps) $5SO100
Park Concessions
$5,00 per hour or $60,00 a day
7 a.m. - 7 a,m, n one day }
i Ambulance Service
Per patient $70.00 - if transported,
'rf transported to Dallas or Fort worth, one-dollar per mile for each i
mile outside of county line,
i
tf Lngineerinj_and Plnnnine~Services (for processing permits, etc,)
See "Filing Fees" on page 1, y'
5
'I r
i
i
l
1
Refuse Collection Fees
Residential $6.75 per 30 days of service
COMMERCIAL CONTAINER RATES
µ
i
2 cubic yard containers
_s
Service per week Mo_ nthl> Charge
1 $11.76
2 18.29
3 24,82
4 31.36
S 37,89
6 144,43
3 cubic yard containers
Service per week Month- Charge
1 ' 15...03
2 $24,82
3 33,32
ff 4 $41.31
5 $50,63 I
6 $59.46
i i
4 cubic yard containers ry
Service per week Monthly Charge
27.96 2 151.02
3 43, 78 f
4 S6. 85
5 69,9]
i 6 82,65
C
1
6-
Charges for Water fr Sewer Service (including charges for basic
service`, service connect n fees, charges for water sewer
taps, meter installation charges and any other service charges.)
30-day Cycle
Water " Schedule h'1
Facility charge; 3/4" meter $ 4.25
1" meter $ 5.00 _
1 1/2" meter $ 7.75
2" meter $ 8.50
Volume Charges
May Oct. 0 - 26 000 gal/month at $1.30/1,000 gal.
Over x,0,000 gal/month at $1,60/1,000 gal.
Nov Apr; All usage $1.30/1,000 gal.
Water Schedule W2
Commercial Charges - 30 day Cycle
4
Facility charge: 3/4" meter $ 9.00
1" meter $ 10,00
1 1/2" meter $ 12,50
2" meter $ 14.25
3" meter 43,00
4" meter 72.00 '
611 meter $ 92.00
8" meter LOS. 00
i
1
Sewer `y
N
Residential (30-day cycle) Schedule S1 !
Facility Charge.: $3,00
Volume F'eess $1.50/1,000 gal.
Residential Solid Waste 00-day cycle) $6.7S
y (980) average water use Dec,., Jan., F'eb.}
Commercial/Industrial (30-day cycle) Schedule 52 +
i
Facility Charge: $3100
4 Volume Fee; $1,60/],000 gal.
1 "Industrial surcharge; Based on concentrations of suspended solids i'
a and biological oxygen demand Of effluent.
Customers outside the city limits 011 pay ISO percent of the above
( rates
for both water and sewer.
a;
1 i.
7"
;'i
Special Service Pees "
1, A connection fee of $15,'00 will be charged to new customers,
11
2. A transfer fee of $15,00 will be charged existing customers for
transferring from one location to another,
3. A reconnect fee of $15,00 will be required if it customer's
service is disconnected for non-payment,
4. A temporary service fee is required in advance for each connec.
tion of temporary service,
5. All services which require special facilities in order to meet
the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to
a special contract and associated fees,
Other Charges or Fees Not Listed Above
z ,
Fire Inspector
(Annual charge based on square feet)
0 - 6,000 $ 15,00
6,001 . 12,000 $ 30,00
12,001 240000 $ 60,00
Over 24,000
' $100,00 ,
i
y
i I
f
4
t
05208
I
t
i
1
i
i
a rt ~ C TR
N~
VO
~l
CO
a N r~o
= ry
C 0) -0
h
yp O
m 7 -I fop O co , f+9
A
py fp pp
O N CC -OM O
R i-1'
066
C) .p
g
i
x o
4 u
? O f~9 O t7
o I
r+
Cl
o rv
1 c
t. ~ i' roo N _ 'f ,
a 1
m ro
rf ~ h ~ o o as
n
-h 0
it n N -~h
ygro
1. ,
tM
1-4
i
(l
i
r' C W ~
i' O O A
w
1 e a O ,p
~ g
i
tip:
ao ~ syr' N 0) 0 asj r> ate- -:n
CA C
m~b~pp ^'~g O 'h Gbt Ifp~ ihJ~
0.W in-F .J j tC n
n {{yy i N S+ m to rrt
O O
O V yC1
IU C3 N1 0 t
x ~
g IC) r-
' O b O p P CR
CD
d
O ~ h
i
yr r
'D rM^
`I
I
f p ~ ~
S'
_ a~ o
i I
* h-i H N N A 0 M 1-~ ViTi1 A M -a"'~j (r1 H ~1 O '
A b b ~C ~-F =0 a 5 ~G V 11 5 J O 3~T•_ 5' O'7 N ~r
a 0 0 " 0' -ws "o " '1 w o V1 +n C]. "
' rf f1 D VR ~~Op -S N ~ fD ' . rv ~s from p CD -ros n' ~
a w • ° J. p p -9 -a a.a.
F-e w Vi O Cl . v A . m A • m
N A .i fT tD O 'S O
o ro S.
91
J, mM
v V
o' IG C n
'fi M A 5 cF ro J, N
IA j
tl'O
HA royJ+c a
e 5 m b ro
W
O
ro O A f~t + O O
(D o ro j
J,
h Q CL1 '~f
J Ny...G
y~ J. J x CY ~
i S I s `Vro~ fdD ,^OJ ro. N C ~ N
c
~S,dro ~ N c7 ~ `
J r
tr ID < p
' M
N
g o
yy1
to NIA G CO
(A (A
y ro y C' a O
a w r,
q ro ro N -
v" IV C)
" .d 1
LO lw to :3
ju 7
i -ai - W -
w a ~ ~
-s
a ~ ~ m
n o ~
ro ~ ro w
4 Y ~ N
-j N)
w
w M oo Ito ^rr(D_
W W~ W K K N ~C~ m
w v' O p C+ r~+ *-t m
m a ~i
ro yg~
~C 9 A~ ~ 'S J O I I V1 R1 ~ +r
--I
a w a 0~
y 'f K N
O O ~J N
h yI
06 :3 rD *3 (A
f J a
CS
i ( w {rC~
a T gab b < I
SSDD' J W -,j W ttp7
= W t~ U" (n Lnn 0 (h II Mtn 6 ro
b o~ . U, Y r-
10 0
a fl Cl C) ti
JI
~w¢ ~ ~yr7
W
~ p pro, p I ~N~
3 r.
a
O 6
I
C ~
r
r
H G G•. -
M ~ i3 C" frog W
7
i7
X, LA
A y: 'n N In > 0 u V- Z V V Ti •-1 ti -A) rn --I -V in --i
N rD n 2 s 3 ~-a t:J to ID }I X N rD - X- rD Y a:
' W . C • .-..S r-~ `5 'S CI r- N 5 -I 1- -1 C1 r-'
to i rn N V III C. Ill
to -5 r+ o- Sn .-I x -0 •-4 i-• -1 rn -l
tw
to •V •V a >-e 2 O O O O (n to V)
r+ w N v c o c5 c c tv in n c" n t7
O :5 N N c y 'S n -Y
-S N) In In
r d f1 b Ut C) C) p •n c- rn
~ O
a g OO`•ic N C) Q p h1 In 'u rno
a t5 oour o Cn o o ~
t : f N IV
•S J.
to N m
m 75 I I. , N p -z-1
rn r' Snz
s N 0) C.
IL W
f+ -s _ : - - - - Y _
_ _ - YJ - w o
to
O M N Z
N W . . r
C7 C)O Cnp O O U nrC
° ca
a C3 o o c~ CD ° C' •-I
I ~ ro n
O ul W
N ♦ _ r '..r- U1 O ..--i U1 W 177
.a. N O O O UOao ' p m.
U O0U 0 O
e~+ o co C) C+ Ca cti o n d
It. Ll l y f rD r
] CL
LA M
t
y~ ~ G yy A Y p
7
M U)
C
5 C
K
2 ~a p W to SN77 x
I'd O
c~
6 N
o yb vUl J
rm y
'-f,)f"r~-_~.___.---- ice.-__'--.____-._..__.
N O L" I-. Ut V ,n d S
y rh p O GJ An O U1
yr O' 00 tlU bQ
(7 G~
Y ID N N O ~
: i W 5. 7
'S 1
(wll
r. 2 Z W W Gl CJ - C7 ' f
n U ~ U rrl.
,b M
F.
MN
10
CL ^S 'S
~CG7 ~ (71 N I.
v L•, U1 411
r
w 1
d'. Sn - w r ~ 471
n
c
r
.n
01
o o1
1J ;n
~OO nn r1
a
c7
r
s
E
i ~
r.
rn _
to v r n ;a z m
C r r --I
m t+ O V) -fi [A lei I ryl
K 0. r+ m m
n H n.-{ n n J, C+ I C r+ iD In ;O
rn ZYz N rt
o 1
mdr rsrc 3 m + 0 o 1 t
--1~:ffrr77MM N nu
M r. ~I »-I --I o Nt .,t C m
HCnnG7 O O t7 O m;D -A
II In I' v tTl O O Gi C) O
N .A 3y ct V7
r- M
7C ,`i fn N Z7 1 t t A m .p nn M '
to s a t t nw S w
¢e i~ o 1000 m co N °
t1i N
D.
A H
M In -it N w y
n N N N N. cn rn N
NI O N Vi Vt O O O f) p
c7 z ~ ~
D
f2 (n O o p U O O L
I
W
1 N N V UI
IV O ;U 0
i 7 Cfl W V7 O O rn n
W O cli C3 CD n Po
O O O b
LO 101007 N... o Q 0 '
V US ...P p A W to A. .
W Cr N Cs ro
9 ~ co w ~p^j o a n
c5
C) 0 C) C) 0 0 (D =1
m 0)
r, M i1
47 Rt
O 7
1~ N bl m K _.v~.....- ..__....M_~.._ C7 `f3 N
N N Vt w H .b f0 r 7.7
N 0 wU1N n c r-
0 Uxl N
C) CD 0 4n CD CD a m
O 0 0 0 0 0 I N N M
0 0 p 0 0 m O
^ -h~ O x
tl 00000
m
t1i
p ri O
(0 S Y N
t N y._......». 0 O z
p
b
rn I
IV LI)
D
Jfr
IM '
f*1 q
~ r
d ~n I1
w
r.. ~
riI
:Y
I
r-
C)`'
:U
CI
l~
yip m.~.T..O. J f
rx v, `(n-~ 'c~N ..nz' m yr ti oyb d
1yv~ ~ryp* ~gq i' 0 -ny 0 w n, rt rt
-4f ( ~i+ N Pl to 8 t+ fp ~n n p -h -n 0) -n o o) ^Irn c~ v
~xpi C Y (A fA * L L A 1° 5 . 1 of c~* rt z
.J J
..J Upt oO O O N O O vi
:.0 a p+ O $ 0 a 0 0 00 00 1411°z
06 Ell O N ~I M V N 0 -"O 01
r+ c ro cn u~ Lh fn w o 1
S!,O u to 1 . 1 . . . . 1 G
^J fJ1 4,J1 In O 00 O O O O O h
I ~ nw
N J J ».1
i y N V'I N v O V O W O N LTI 0 (/1
W fn w o fn A 0 0 o C7 O o --ii
'iH h . . . . . 66 . . 0
m 9 Do °o $ Do 00 ~00 800
1
rt O fn O O O _ _.N In fh Sn _
1 . 1 I. . . . 1 . 1
Cr
O. O O O O O O C7 O O
p * In
0 ~ Vt o 0 z {
C, 0 CD
1~~ d O O O O , N O q O 20.'
0 N °o o CNN vs w w ~ 0 L"
C) 00 C, C~
Iw1i ppN O -48 p OO OO CD OO W O O 88
G4OC~ C7
47 O 98 _ O .__C
31
Lpt N
W
Do a ro
W o f.
~j A ti t
8 S C) 0 S 088
1-4
o f~ °o w 7u I.
x
tl 8 8 e 8 8 88
C) C7 C7 O N O O fit f? N 0 •C
1 . . 1 1 . 1 1 . . 1 ly
8 S8 S 8 8 8ogg I
}
8 8' 88 S 0 8 S S8
,c
I
`y` C O
n
CI
a) 4b 0
$o Q °o ~g Q tirn
J
p M r+W w
(;1 ~ In ~ N fit N O
r pp y ~~jj 'pi 06 O
IJ
r`w paro `i $a~ ana nH ro
MO ro H 9, o~ 9 a ~'p mm aY~ y
it YI
f I N N N W N N N N N (a`y~
` O N W F, W WO W N 00 ~i
r• N
.fF
f1
~ N I N N N N N N N N
N O N Y A N Ul w G O M qq
.q A I H O O J
C) N n r
~D l.o Ln J
I` ? W
~ O
4
}
i, ~ 1 O W O tn3
44 1 d m r o N a N w
0 o Ja \ a Ul
a ~
44 b N ° o
w N
to
a
44
O
s I N N z 'x x N N N
i
44 a
44 b Ln 0 a M
b N N o \ I $A
k qI I~ ro
\ n 1 i I W I I F
1 k4 c M 11
I
j
1 1 n o ras a b N
i I N I Z U. N N N N j
C) C) LA H CA
a
k Un E
t
44 IA 2 1
,I O N F+ 2 C M ` \ o W v66
tiC- iMu d yyyy w r
4 1 7 I N a N II W
{ I C) UI \ I T
M KS ~ Ey°
O O -
O O O p
1' I r
' N N
.t
:d k"
ff n
464 44
} ~i k w vi ~ N
h
a .
x y;
u w a
w ~
r
i Ln Ln
~ w t I
r y }
f ~ f
1 3 1111
f x x
I
I
1 44 iA b
i w 4
i o Na `
w
f W w
x
~j
3
a
n
Y
W C P
8
44
o N
vi o P c L4
M H
H
N N C
ti C W O A
co O
N 440
y+oq e
~nm F
N N ,
Q
N 44 IA
q t» No c
1 ~
} b
j a~ A y j
Q MM F~',
P
41
1 k W A
i ,
~ M N hd
p N
do
tl
yyy{ N rA Y o
7
OP
z
i
i dd
B
m
N o K" y"» ow nn" r" n"
G It G
N N rrr W y N' O rt
m A P H.
"L
O In ~ W IT 41 +n
s .d
• rs
N
~ N i; w J w J W
in ul
in Ln H
V1
N N W ~ NS aQ
i, VE N O+ N CNf7 N in n L"E
t~E N J VE p Ut i
p N p
AA 4A 460 ~ j/1 N C y
3# x
3
N
i ~ GGGIII y_
r
s ~ r
j
r
0
N N
M n x
N N
H
H
8
N. a
ro a ~a
1 co kv
N
in
i ~
s w r~
1W
J. e v+
S a a a
o ul a
00
"sj to fi x
I
gog~ n a `i
N L"
0 C)
PA 44
o o N {
N N ~ff A M MGGG rye , } t,
111i j
' h N U
N LM \ I
FA 44
1. co { 1
i w
44
N a
' n o I -
x
N In N
H
m ti m
f i f
(D iw
a *1
C) to
NO o Lq m
m
v
o
~
H Ch t7 t0
LO CD
N
a
N
90
' x
oo~o
15, L.4vm
f
In N ~
p ~A V1+
" w N
c p
b
40
Co Y f~Yy H
h AO ~G p „ M lYhdii
}
~ ~ o~psp
r co
f f
r
w OP
w z ~4 N
w
0 ~
~f
~;i
y'~ Rl rwN W ~Nn O
J
i° M O v+
N N ) H
rt
rr en
LFI O N ~T
NH
A b UI ~UQpp ~p
{ N N N O r~
40,
Lrl
a ob rn n
of F' M
N A
y. b
Atl
W N
x
441
W
C
f
G
N
a hJ ab o H
Ln N r ~ r
8 b 04 IRO
~
' N~roMf~S F ~
/p H
b " to
M N w LLy ~(~ryJ
0 41
N~ LA
LA
r
n~
O
j
Cl W W
I1to W - i
"M I!?,
s
j
1
it .
~ I,
f M " y Cc~~ ro
1-4
-1 H m a 1 0 y m a m A
r l O N l0 .OiO ,r N W PV F-' Vr
r) ro i
W.
1 ~U3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O to
a p
J
< 1
.A3 9 N N N NN
Fj 0.
p fD O
J
Q yu
4il n
A AAA
r S i ~ o a tj
i
~ m
E N
0) CA C-)
Po
cn 0
lid
i zz
t IJ
WH
f
w
S N °i
i
USER FEE RATE INCREASE COMPAR1SiON
FULL RECOVERY CURRENT STAFEF/
BUARDS
IM t~E[' Br~ ? MEtdT COST REVENUE COPSSUL'CRNT
FIRE DEPARTMENT $209,622 $ 51,205 $160,827 $142,005
~ 109,622 90,800
hmount of Increase
r
2 Increase over 214% 177%
Current Revenue
04
of Full
Le G OV 24.4$ 76.7% 67,7%
e cost
;LIBRARY $172,969 $ 48,000 $130,862 $ 48,250
Amount of Increase $ 82,862 $ 250
increase over 1731 5%
Current,"Revenue
of Full 27.7% 75._63 27.83
Reooverv Cost
{
PARKS AND
RECREATION $208,898 $ 57,538 $ 87,326 $ 69,738
$ 29,788 $ 12,200 4
~ Amount of Increase
increase over 51,7% 21.2%
Current Revenue
i
% of Full
geooverv cost, 27,5% 41.8% 33,3% r
PLANNING AND !
i
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT $154,303 $ 22,550 $143,492 $124,114
9 Amount of Increase $120,942• $101,564
9 s
9 Increase over 536% 450%
Current Revenue
% of pull 14,6% 2?.93 90_ ,4%
Reooverv Coat
POLICE DEPARTMENT $165,575 $ 10,000 $ 30,633 $ 300633
R $ 20,633 $ 200633 ~I
Amount of Increase
t Increase over 2063 206%
1 currant Revenue
% of Full
ery 6,0% 19.08
2ecov goat
14 PUSIJC WORKS $444,673 $182,485 $327,946 $327,946
h Amount, of Increase
$145,461 $145,461 Increase over so,o% ao,0't
Current Revenue
s
% of Full
Reoo Pry_gost 9? ,0$ 74 0% 74,,,0
TOTAL $11356,040 $371,778 $881,086 $742,686
p Amount of Increase $5091308 $370,908
t Increase over
Current Revenue 137 ,0% 99.9%
}
% of Tull L80 ba,.0
R~QhVh1 C451~ w_~~_ r
iA11 user fee revenua in this analysis only inciudes money generated from fee
;items lietnd in the I)ropoeed Ordinance and tY,e cost related to delivering
eorvSCe6 aseociAtod with these fees.
y k:i
' `afyo aJl.?x.dr +~lYk i(6Uo , .•!Hl dMi , s:?..-b .~Y "w 1t N. .W',.r ~ u i+ ..t.g.u l4 _ r
' Slv ~ iry, {h.` , 1~, tiyyh. YV - A Yps w A4 K.:l> . Is/ Y
,Y f C?RS r7 1 5 v ! ! d'..{ 5' Sri c St
F y a# Y ' l T.pL 1 M~S~ t / YS y ++;~~1 f2 KUj;
/ P1 ,.7. r3 + I ^ VJfI, S~s~fj:.zm tr`A:..
Z, IV J y y? tea ' r a y IP d ur
r tD '1t• vli x . xL 1 iFTtr },y4,. , r i1,3 rt p ~H s,~ Yr1 y 1. A.-^ ,r
! { .<7,7 ~ yr~ ~k, rr d q 1~5{' ,y G'~{~f xLtiY -7`~, lr ~f+ /r-I~ ,:si<Y s I~`~,: 1 >•,t~+
~.1 r,,G:./ `rt'l~fFL,r)r i~F; ,~i. t e'. k~ram~'... .W`~ i ~1L27:41'~3.+~s~i'7^_•. S/. .ate ,r~1 wY;. 4+ _
NO. ~.~-1r9
AN:,ORDINANCE' ESTABLISHING ''CERTAIN FEES TO BE PAID TO THE CITY OF."
DENTON,''TEXAS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~r
Z THE COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS.;
SECTION 1..:
{ The following fees AS SHOWN ON Exhibit "A" attached, hereto'
are hereby established and shall be' paid to tY City of Denton,
i
Texas.
SECTION II.
This ordinance shall become effective upon its passage and
approval,
T~
PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of November, 1983,.
j
{
{
D 0. EW , MAYO {
CI OF DE TON, TEXAS
f
1
}
ATTESx'
.
CHAKLUTTZ ~
CITY OF DENTON,TF.XAS
} APPROVED AS TO FORM: i
1 C J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
7
i
n
V
t:J I t„t ~.ti~ t~.'"~5~~ !jt'4"?f "RL'Anl vS iT R r •t y y w 2rY`l"t a
~f RJR \tn tt. 'f , Y ~ ..rte R.1 'ii 1 13y'S ~4y ^ ~k"t Y 'f toe i r~~--rr``a ti
R 1. r 4S iAI S J 1t ~i u.. ~ ".v r y .t~'.r: Re y, a ` i.t 7t V~ i Rt ~ t%V^ 'at~~t'~17it7, r
t~pf'Lt~f~#^~ q+~ i A .i„1. .;'d c~v 1 > xr Iy~ts r.la n..
~ P 1 tltl `4 ~ rr ~lu~ 1
r
t_ rNd i f t n~ 1 IGt~ 1
r~ y C, 1})5 filet 1'i>,.r Y:•~p1''., a ~4.I rrt t.\ rgr~ t
t "v i° hti'cy~eR tr NC .1., j~,~l+ ttT\k° x!tr t t! <v ! "?~y~. a ',.t 4~... Xtt ! \ a4. '
trln '~d.,t F7s'ktti~l t ~Err >.5;.
EXHIBIT A
DEPARTMENT FEES ~
TIRE
Ambulance
Per patient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 70.00
Fire Inspector
` Annual Charge Based On Square Feet
I ~
I 0-6000 tl $ is.00
6001-12,000 30.00 i
12401-24400 . . . . . . . . 60.00
E over 24,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00
I Automatic Exting. System Installation
NewInspection (Contractor Charged) 50.00
Annual Inspection (Owner Charged)
.
25.00
I~
Gasoline & LPG Tank Installation
inspection .(Contractor.Charged) 50.00
F Sprinkler System Installation Inspection ,
ij (Contractor Charged) . . . . . . . . . 50.00.
I
Standpipe system Installation Inspection
(Contractor Charged) 50.00
i 1 LIBRARY
Non-Denton County Resident $ 35.00 I
PARKS AND RECREATION
Is f
Athletic Leagues f
Per Team , $ 30.00
Athletic Rentals
Per Tournament Session (Unlighted). . 5,00 per hour
(Lighted).,. 10.00 per hour
AtLietic ractice 1
Per Practice (Unlighted) 5.00 per hour
(Lighted) 10.00 per hour
is Individual Swimming Admissioni
Child .
Adult . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.00
f Senior Citizen Adult 1100
Season Pass . . . . . 25.0
i Family Pass 60.00
Cemeteries;
# Non-resident of Denton Lot $300,00
R^sicent of Denton Lot . . r R . 250.00 '
infant Lot 75.00
Concretre Work Permit . . . . . 25.00
k; Interment Permit , . . r , 1 1 25,00
t
t
EXHIBIT A PAGE ONE
i
I
yyt . J .vft i• . a ~,p- t ti.:y I ..r..~p1'`kkfkl }
t.7 Frei r14, ^rLFi3r&W?Si'JAn"}r~t'4)M1S Yn 4},o r31~~,J ' it ♦ Y k° a.1Jt :i~r w 1 $SWl he.
3 S r
k 3 t ~4Y\ n ~Cll rG 1 r i~t5 t ' n 4 Y ^ - ~ . IJ
1. li L.', ^ _ r. ~ { "i.", .p !^Xl y'k~'~. .if. t te'S. ; . t ~.`t
l `PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Plats
Initial Plat
Less than 3 lots or less than'5 acres $100.00
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325.00
3 Replat
I Without Notification
3 Less than 3 lots or less than 5 acres $150.00
Other . . . . . . . . 650.00
Replat
With Notification
Less than 3 lots or less than 5 acres 150.00
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650.00
zoning Changes
Less than'3 lots or less than 5 acres $400.00
Other , . , , . , 500.00
it 5pecifin Use Permit . . . . . . . . . . 400.04
~ Historic Landmarks .
25.00
Subdivision Ordinance Variance 75.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Warrant Service . . . . . . $ 25. i
Funeral Escorts
45 Minutes or Less . . . . . $ 12.00 t
Other, Up to 90 minutes , . , , 24.00
Accident Offense Report . . , . , . . . , . 3,00
Vehicle-Impoundment 13.50
PUBLIC WORKS
I
Animal Control Impound F
Holding
i Small Animals (dogs) $ 4.00
Large Animals (cattle) . 6.00 i
Adoption' . . . . . . . . . . . 10:00
Carcass Retrieval . . . 5.00
f
Animal Impoundment i
Class A
First impoundment . , , . . $ 20.00
a Second Impoundment , , , . . . , . 30,00
Third Impoundment . . . . . . . . . . . , 45.00
Fourth Impoundment . . . . . . . . 67,00
Class B
First impoundment . . . . 27.00
Second Impoundment . . . . . . . 40.00
Third Impoundment . . , . . . . , . . 60,00
Fourth impoundment . . . . . . . . . 90,00
Class C
First impoundment . . . . . , . . 34.00
Second Impoundment . . . . . . 50.00
Third impoundment . 75.00 i i
Fourth impoundment . . . . . . . . . 113,00
Class D
First Impoundment 34.00
Second impoundment 50.00
;r Third Impoundment . . . . . 75.00
Fourth Impoundment . . . . . . . . . 113,00
3
Animal Registration
3 Unneutered, Unspayed Animals 5.00
Neutrrodp Spayed :animals . . , . . . . . 3.00
''EXHIBIT A P.GL T W 0
T ` Jy14LL<.~il [-4 +r.': 1 ,St•.u va
a t
ILL
ty tIS
r~Y 1kY
yJ~'.T\,la a, 1F~ ~ If . rte ~}11~1!,nh
Yt
14 n" 3 ~r.a ,1P
Curb cuts $ 51.00
i ~
Sign Permits
0.50 square feet . . . . . , $ 15.00
3 51-100 square feet . , , , . , . , . 20.00
101-200 square feet . . . . . . . . . . 25.00
201-300 square feet . . 4 . , , , , , , . . 30400
301-400 square feet , , . . . . . . 50.00
401-500 square feet . . . . . . . . . , . 100,00
Plus 500 square feet . . . . . . . 150,00
certificate of Occupancy $ 18.00
Maps
Per Individual Maps $ 2,00
Water and Sewer Maps (Book of maps) , . . . 350.00
,
Barricade Inspeo ion (No charge for curb cut
barricade inspections) $ 16.00
{ Q~ Inspections
Board of Adjustment Fee $ 50.00
Weed Cutting (Notice Notification Fee) 55.00
Junk Vehicle Removal . . . . . , , . , , , , 25,00
Mobile Home Inspection (Annual Fees) f
Per Park . . . , . , . . . . . . . 205.00
Plus Per Stand Charge . . . . , . , , , 4.10
o
` i
I
t
w
i
i
3.
f
1
r
a
i
t,ti,
,
NO. „
i AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES TO BE: PAID TO THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS.:
SECTION I.
The following fees AS SHOWN ON Exhibit "A" attached hereto
..are hereby established and shall be paid to the City of Denton,
Texas.
Ih, SECTION II.
Tn s ordinance shall become effective upon its passage and
approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of November, 1983. ~
RICHAKD f
h 0. STEWART, MAYOR j
I R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ~
i
ATTEST:
r
t
CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
C. J TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
- - L
i
.
3 ,
a
I
i
'I
r
p
EXHIBIT A
t FEES
DEPARTMENT
FIRE
Ambulance $ 70.00
per 'patient
Fire Insoector
Annual Charge Based Un Square Feet
$ 15,00
0-6000 30,00
6001-12,000 6004
12,001-24,000 100.00
over 24,000
Automatic E.xtiag• System Installation
NeW Inspection (Contractor-Charged) 50,00
Annual Inspection (owner Charged) 25.00
Gasoline & LPG Tank Installation 50.00
"r Inspection (Contractor Charged)
r
Sprinkler System installation Inspection 50.00
(Contractor Charged)
! Standpipe System Installation XnspECtioe1 50.00
Contractor Charged)
LIBRARY
Non-Denton County Resident $ 35.00 ,
I
r PARKS AND RECREATION'
` Athletic Leagues
Per Team
Athletic Rentals 5;00/hour unlighted i
Per Tournament Session 10,00/hour lighted E
Athletic Practice
Per practice 5.00/hour unlighted E
1000/hour lighted
Individual Swimming Admission;
Child 0.75
1,00
Adult 1,00
Senior Citizen Adult '
Season Pass 25;00
Family Pass 60.00
CeweGezies:
` Non-resident of Denton Lot $300.00
Resident "of Denton Lot 250.00
infant Lot 75.00
'
Concrete Work Permit 25.00
Interment Permit 25.00
PLANNING AND COMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
.
Plats -
Initial Plat.
Replat witnc'.:t ,.otif,
Repeat k'ite' no, tif
~ t .
f ~
A
. I
'r;ck, 11%F ,h
Zoning Cnanges
Less than 5 acres
More than 5 acres
Specific Use Permit
Historic Landmarks
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Warrant Service '
Funeral Escorts vu ~l,
11 Accident Offense Report
Vehicle Impoundment
N PUBLIC WORKS
3 Animal Control Impound
Holdingg
Small Animals (dogs) ~a U t~
f Large Animals (cattle) _r
l Adoption
i Euthanasia
Residents
ton-Residents
Carcass Retrieval u 4
Imp ound Only 61LInvestigation-Charge to Users
y Animal Impoundment
Class A
First Impoundment
Second Impoundment
Third Impoundment
Fourth Impoundment
r~ Class B is
a First Impoundment
Second Impoundment I
Third Impoundment
Fourth Impoundment
Class C
First Impoundment
Second Impoundment
Third Impoundment
Fourth Impoundment i
;r Class n 1
First Impoundment t
Second Impoundment
Third Impoundment
Fourth Impoundment
i
Animal Registration
Unneutered, Unspayed Animals
~s Neutered, Spayed Animals
Electrical Permits
Minimum Fee r}
Re-Inspection
Delinquent Fee C
Outlets
r
;i Per Outlet next 25
Per Outlet over 50
Service
Per Amp
Circuits
First 4
Per Circuit, next 46
Per Circuit, over 50
Pc r. WiC.n Ci+:cuit
Lame , otor r a'oove
Per t
i
w
Per Motor over 3
Small Motors-less than lhp -
First 5
Per Motor over 5
i. Curb Curs - 00
Sign Permits
50 sq.ft. x 15.00
51-100 sq.ft, x 20.00
101-200 sq-ft- x 25,00
t 201-300 sq,ft, x `30.00
301-400 sq.ft. x 50,00
401-500 sq.ft. x 100.00
+500 sq.ft. x 150.00
Certificate of Occupancy r~ (1'U
=~agneain._St-reet-Drainage-Projects-
map s
` Per Individual Maps
Water and Sewer Maps ,Jw
13arrtcade Inspection i
Inspections
Board of Adjustment Fee
Weed Cutting ;
Junk Vehicle Removal 55r'
Mobile Pome Y s ecti
on
n /1 (4Per Park
}F UU'~Y Per Stand a
r
i
t
t
i
r I
r.
i
i
' :P
~r. , ~ r
N
i
r
i-
E
a
~ s