HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-17-1984
A(34NDA
GITY OF OWTON G1'1 X COU14C iL
January 17, 1964
work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesaau,
January 17, 1984, at 5;30 pp.M4 in the training Room of the
Service Center at wnich tae followio& items will be considered;
5;30 p.m.
1. View a presentation and receive a rev.--r on Lhe Ciey
of Denton's Economic DevelopmeoC Program,
2, Consider Phase 11 of the Fixed Asset Inventory Project.
3. Discussion of City nealth insurance program.
4. Uiscussion of annexation of approximately 53 acres of
land proposed for single tamily residential
development located on the east side of highway 377
south of brusn Creek Road.
5. Receive a report concerning the status of the grants.
b, Receive a report on south Denton residential
development on property zoned for higner uses.
7. Executive Session;
A. t,egal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6254-i7
V.A.I.S.
8. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(t), Art. 6152-i7
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.I.S.
D. board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Aat
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton (;ity Council on Tuesday,
January 17, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
:Municipal Building at which the .ollowing items will be
considered:
7;00 P.M.
1. Consider approval. of the Minutes of the Regular
[Meeting of iiovamber l), 1983; the Special Calied
L'*ieeting of November 2'2, 1983.
City of 0anton City Council Agenda
January 17, 1984
Page '1'wo
Consent Agendas
Each of these items is recommended by the Statt and
approval thermot will be strictly on the basis of the
Staft recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. bids and Purchase Orders;
1. Bid 92U9 - Drainage and paving of
Ridgeway Drive
G, Bid 9219 - Ambulance
3. Bid 9'22U - Switches for Electrical
Distribution
4. Bid 9221 - Transrormer bases
5. bid V223 - Concrete slab
u. bid i 9224 - Roll-off refuse vehicle lcruc-x)
7. bid # 9"'z5 - Mater and sewer supplies
g, Bid # 9230 - PVC conduit 5"
9. Purchase Order # b12U9 to rlAPCO, Inc,, in
the amount of $3,590.00
b. Plats and Keplats;
1. Approval of the preliminary plat of lots A
and b, Uenton Square Addition, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
2. Approval of the tinal replat of part of lots
1 and 20 of the First lnstallment of the
Carroll Park Addition. (1ne Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of the tinal replat of part of lot
9, block 4, of the College Addition. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
3. Consider approval of Phase 11 of the Fixed Asset
inventory Yroject.
5
6ity of Denton City Council Agenda
January 17, 1964
Page Three
4. Ordinancest
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Chapter four (4) of the Code of Ordinances to
revise the definitions of stray animals and
establishing mandatory animal registration.
a. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
amendment to planned development (PD-50) to
permit an approximately 20'x60' handball/
racquetball recreational facility on a site
presently approved for playground use. Planners
development (PD-50) is the site of the Remsgare
multi-tamily development which begins rit the
northeast corner of Bernard and Lindsey Streets,
(Z-1020)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 1014.4 acres of Jana
located south of Highway 38U and west of 1-35.
('L-1610) ('The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
u. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
pian annexing approximately 43.9 acres of lane
located west of 1-35W and south of the existing
city limit line. (Z-1611) ('Ne Planning ana
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 367 acres of land
located between 1-35w and the Santa Fe Raiiroao,
(Z-1612) (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 115 acres of land
located on both sides of Mayhill Road north of
1-35. (Z-1b13) (The Planning and Zoninit,
Commission recommends approval.)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance reinstating the
Data Processing Advisory Board until January 19,
1986.
H. Consider adoption of an amendment to the Cone or
Ordinances, Section 2131-35 concerning the
replacement of sidewalks within the City,
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing
ordinance 63-132 relating to the consumption of
alcoholic beverages in motor vehiclas.
t City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 17, 1984
Page Four
51 Resolutions:
on tstrwould
eet$
A. al.lowdCountypCommisioners resolution that
within the City of Denton.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City manager to sign and submit to the Department
of Housing and Urban Development a final
statement of objectives and pro,)ected use of
funds witn appropriate certifications, as
authorized and required by the dousing anQ
Community Development Act of 1474, as amended.
6. Consider approval of a construction and maintenance
agreement for bridge replacement on Masch Branch Roaa
with the Texas Department of Highways and Public
'transportation.
7. Official Action on Executive Session items;
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. board Appointments
6. New business;
This item provides a Section for Council Member co
suggest new items of business for future agendas.
Cj tR'r1F'KATE
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted an the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, rexa s, on
the day of 1984
at 01, Aock (a.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1166C
AGENDA
CITY OF DENION LI'lY GUUNUIL
January 17, 1984
work Session of the City o1 Denton City Council on Tuesday,
January 17, 1984, at 5130 .m. in the 'training Room of the
Service (enter at which the following items will be considered:
5:30 p.m.
L. View a presentation and receive a report on the city
of Denton's Economic Development Program.
1. Conside!: Phase 11 of the Fixed Asset Inventory Project.
3. Discussion of City health insurance program,
4. Discussion of annexation of approximately 53 acres of
land proposed for single Lamily residential
development located on the east side of highway 377
south of brush Creek Road.
5. Receive a report concerning the Status of the grants.
b. Receive a report on south Denton residential
development on property zoned for higner uses.
7. Executive Session:
A. Legal. flatters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-1/
V.A.I.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(1), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.I.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
b252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of toe City of Denton city Council on Tuesday,
January 17, 1984 at 7:0U p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
,Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
1:00 P.M.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes oL the Regular
Meeting or iiovember 15, 1983; the Special Called
Meeting of November Z, , 1983.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 17, 1984
Page Two
2. Consent Agenda;
lsach of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval. thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Start recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;
1, Bid # 9209 - Drainage and paving of
Rld)seway Drive
2 , bid # 9219 - Ambulance
:lid # 9220 - Switches for Electrical
Distribution
4. bid # 9221 - Transformer bases
5, sid # 9223 - Concrete slab
u. laid # 9224 - troll-otf refuse vehicle (trucx)
7. Bid # 9225 - dater and sewer supplies
S, Bid # 9230 - PVC conduit 5"
9. Purchase order # 61109 to MAPCO, Inc., in
the amount of $3,590.00
8. Plats and eteplatss
1. Approval of the preliminary plat of lots A
and li, Denton Square Addition. One
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
'2. Approval of the final replat of part of lots
1 and 2, of the First installment of tine
Carroll Park Addition. ('I tie Planning ano
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of the final replat of part of lot
9, block 4, of the College Addition. ("rhe
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
Consider approval of Phase 11 of the Nixed Asset
Inventory Project.
,
pity of Denton city Council Agenda
January 17, 1964
Page Throe
Ordinances;
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending
Chapter Four (4) of the Code of Ordinances to
revise the definitions of stray animals and
establishing mandatory animal registration.
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving at'
amendment to planned development (PD-50) to
permit an approximately 10'x60' handball/
racquetball recreational facility on a site
presently approved for playground use. Planned
development (PD-50) is the site of the Ramsgate
multi-family development which begins at the
northeast corner of Bernard and Lindsey Streets,
(Z-ln'LU)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 1014,4 acres of land
located south of Highway 36U and west of 1-35.
(L-1610) (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 43,9 acres of land
located west of 1-35W and south of the existing
city limit line, (Z-1611) ('l he Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing'
nnexing approximately 367 acres of land
located between 1-35W and the Santa Fe Railroad,
(Z-1611) (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
1''. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 1115 acres of land
located on both sides of Mayhil.l. Road north of
1-35. (L-lb13) (The Planning and Coning
Commission recommends approval,)
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance reinstating the
Data Processing Advisory Board until January 19,
196b,
H. Consider adoption of an amendment to the Code or
Ordinances, Section 1131-35 concerning the
replacement of sidewalks within the City,
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing
Ordinance 63-132 relating to the consumption of
alcoholic beverages in motor vehicles.
1
Gity of Denton City Council Agenda
January 17, 1984
Page Four
S, Resolutionsi
A. Consider approval of a resolution that would
allow County Commissioners to do work on streets
within the City of Denton.
B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City ManAger. Lo sign and submit to the Department
of Hour,ing and urban Development a final
statement of objectives and projected use of
funds with appropriate certifications, as
authorized and required by the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974, as amended,
6. ConsTdar approval of a conritruction and maintenance
agreement for bridge replacecneaL on Masch Branch Rudd
with r,h(s Texas Department of Highways and Pub11c
Transportation.
7. Official Action o.i ExeCuL1Ve Session items;
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
G, Personnel '
D. Board Appointments
8. New 13uslness;
't'his item provides a section for Council Member Lo
suggest new items of business for future agendas,
i;EK'1'lE'1CA'1'f;
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the Cicy Hall of the Clty of Denton, Texas, on
the day of 1984
at o'clock (a.m.) (p.m,)
I
CI'T'Y SGCRe'1'ARY
1166C
* JL
CfrYo/OEWON, rRXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 5668200
MWORANDUM
DATE, January 12, 1984
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM; Betty McKean, Assistant. City Manager
SUBJECT; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
The following report Is provided to you as a summary of the
City of Denton's Economic Development Program. This report
includes an overview of program goals, objectives achieved, and
possible future actions,
The City of Denton's Economic Pevelopment Program consists of
the following goals;
o Attracting potential industrial and commercial newcomers
to Denton;
o Providing complete and accurate information to
businesses considering relocating in Denton;
o Organizing the process of the dissemination of
information to serious business prospects, thereby
avoiding often conflicting duplication of efforts by the
City, Chamber, School District, and other entities, and
making the needed data available in one location;
o Identifying attractive industrial sites.
To achieve these goals the following activities were completed
during this past year;
o Development of an Economic Development Slide Show, A
program was developed in a slide show and video format,
The video format will allow the City to make the show
available on a loan basis to companies considering
relocating to North Texas. Citizen groups will also be
able to borrow the program for civic presentations;
Mayor and City Council Membors
January 12, 1984
Page Two
a Development of a targeted program of industrial trade
journal advertisements to market the City of Denton,
Advertisements were sponsored in the East. Texas
Industrial District's Guide and the Dallas Industrial
District's Guide;
o Participation in exhibitions to market Denton, On
September 26-27, 1984 the City of Denton and Chamber of
Commerce will co-sponsor an exhibit booth at the Dallas
Market Hall Industry and Business Expo, The staff made
an Economic development presentation in November at the
National League of Cities conference in New Orleans;
o Development of an Economic Development Factbook to be
distributed to companies seriously considering Denton as
a relocation site;
o Prepared a Development Review Checklist to provide
information for developers;
o Industrial site maps for Denton nre being developed in
cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce and private
developers.
Future activities include:
o Formal presentation of the slide show at the March 15,
1984 Annuol Chamber of Commerce Banquet;
o Evaluation of glter.nati.ve wethods for encouraging
industrial development in Denton;
o Continuing to actively market Denton, through the slide
show, advertisements, industrial exhibit shows and other
efforts to recruit industries;
o Continued cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce to
develop a coordinated program of Economic development-
o Continuing to update the Factbook and provide this
information to developers,
Since May, 1983, the City of Denton has expended $18,279 of the
$40,232 obligated for Economic Development, The remaining
$21,953 will be obligated based on costs for delivering
services are presented in this report,
fietty Mc e
Assistant City Manager
ja
0108]
cirv a/ DENTON, TEXAS MUN10PAL BUILDING % DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817 566.8200
L1a'1' OF ECONOi11G Dl VELOPMEtci 6XPEN011URES
May 1, 19113 - December 31, 1983
11'EM AMOUN 1
Economic Development Slide Show $11055100
Economic Development Factbook 4,489,54
East i'exas Industrial District's 1,050.00
Guide Advertisement
Dallas lndustritil District:'s Guide 780.00
Advertisement
Art work and Design of Advertisement 1~5.uu
Exhibition Booth - New Orleans 96.5e
Aerial Photograpns for Slide Show 8b.00
West Texas Chamber of commerce 50.00
Economic Uevelopment Meeting
Industrial Site Map Printing 4bbb
IVIAL lb, G78. 12
Unobligated Funds remaining by December 31, 1983 amountea to
$21, 953.17.
11j
.January 1/, 1984
1584M
CITYot DBNTON, r1FXAS MUNWIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
r M 0 R A N D 0 M
TO: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
FRO14: Kathryn Usrey, Personnel Administrator
SUBJ: The Impact cf Adding Retirees to the City Insurance Program
DATE: January 11, 1981
Last December when we presented the insurance bids to the Council for the City
health insurance, they requested that we research the impact of adding
retirees to the City insurance plan, The following is my report,
SHOULD RETIREES BE ALLOWED TO REMAIN ON
O~UP HUM 1NMIM"ROGRAM
From a financial standpoint it is felt that the City cannot be responsible for
retirees for the rest of their lives regarding health insurance, We also feel
it is unfair for current employees to carry the burden of covering retirees on
the insurance program. In 1978, when the City began looking at a
self-insurance program, serious consideration was given to the impact of
allowing retirees to remain on our program. Obviously, the larger the group
of senior people with more serious health problems, the higher the risk and
certainty of claims against the group plan. Due to the skyrocketing medical
costs, and the impact of these claims on our plan, we were forced to make the
decision to remove them from our program, The retirees who were already on
our health insurance plan in 1978 were allowed to remain. However, it was
determined from that point on that benefits would stop at the point of
termination for all other employees,
If humanitarian concerns were the only consideration, then, certainly it would
be preferable to allow retirees to remain or, our plan, if, however, this
policy were enacted, the impact for our current city employees would be
considerable. Their rates would have to--F rased in order to subsidize the
additional risk of the retirees and their spouses.
Memo to Dotty McKean
RE: Adding Retirees to Insurance Plan
Page 2
IMPACT ON STOP LOSS LEVEL
Funding for a'ne4,r, higher aggro gate level will be necessary because of the
increased claims liability for the City and would eventually require
substantial premium increases for all employees.
Maintaining retirees on an insurance program definitiely impacts the stop loss
level established by the insurance company. This level, you will recall, is
the point at which the city stops paying claims and the reinsurance coverage
begins. This is determined by and due to the long term risk that retirees
present; our aggregate level could potentially be greatly increased. Life of
the Southwest indicates that for every retiree on the plan for a full year,
our aggregate will be increased oy approximately $3,000 per year per retiree.
This will be calculated in the following manner:
Expected Average Claims (EAC)
Employees:
$ 98,15 x 12 mos x 1,25 x # of employees a aggregate level
Retirees:
$196,30 x 12 mos x 1.26 x # of retirees - retiree aggregate level
The FAC for employees is $98,16, For retirees, however, the EAC would be
.$196.30.
The calculation for employees and retirees would them be combined to give us
our new aggregate level;
Employee Aggregate Level
+ Retiree Aggregate Level
New ggrega e ever" l
It was my understanding that the Council wanted to look at the impact of
adding retirees between the ages of 50 and 65 to this program. I have to
assume that we would also cover the spouses of those retirees, We researched
our current employee group and found that we have approximately 84 employees
who are between the ages 50 and 65. Without further definition of the term
retiree, this would mean that all 84 employees, and their dependents, would be
eligible to come on our insurance program as a retirep., This is in addition
to the number of current City employees. At the current cost of $3,000 per
year, this would be an additional $252,000 added to our aggregate level.
Memo to Betty McKean
RE: Adding Retirees to insurance Plan
Page 3
IMPACT OF ADDING RETIREES
ACROSS A 10 YEAR PERIM-
YEAR # RETIREES *ADDITION TO AGGREGATE LEVEL
1 5 15,000
2. 10 30,000
3 i5 45,000
4 20 60,000
5 25 75,000
6 30 90,000
7 35 105,000
8 40 120,000
n 45 135,000
10 50 150,000
AS SUMP TTMJ: Five retirees per year between the ages of 50-513 will be AnOED
per year,
*Based on 1984 rAC figures for retirees submitted by Life of the Southwest.
Although it is understood that realistically, not all of those would retire
immediately, it does reflect the potential impact on our aggregate level
within a 10 yoer period. If we have 5 employees per year going on the program
as retirees, the impact on our aggregate level, for the first year, may iiot be
significant, But across a 10 year period, as you can see on the chart, the
impact becomes much greater, Assuming that are have 5 retirees per year, in 5
year's time we are adding $75,000 to our aggregate level, and, in 10 year's
time, $150,000. 'rhe $3,000 per person does not seem large until you start
examining a cumulative effect.
ADDITION OF RETIREES-- IMPACT ON CLAIMS
The impact on the claims level is even greater than the problem related to
getting stop loss insurance at a reasonable level in that you also have the
claims of the retiree's dependents. Statistics show that individuals within
the age group of 50 to 65 do not necessarily have more claims, but their
claims average 1 112 -times higher than those 40 and under. Therefore, the
real impact: of adding retirees to the program is the increase in our claims,
Hemo to Betty McKean
Adding Retirees to Insurance Plan
Page d
The $3,000 per retiree per year being added to the aggregate level does not
mean that we mould be liable for only $3,000 worth of claims por retiree, We
would be responsible for all of the retirees claims until either the
individual claim reaches $50,000 or the group's composite claims reach the new
aggregate level,
Last year our claims were $606,285, Our average monthly claims were
approximately $50,683 per month, Although we may not see an immediate major
impact on claims by adding h or 5 retirees during the first year, across the
next 10 years, the cumulative effect of having retirees and their dependents
on that plan could cause our claims level to skyrocket. Since, our aggregate
has also been raised, the claims will be a City liability funded through our
rates (passed through to current city employees), The real impact on our
insurance program will not be immediate. It will occur in the next few years
when the number of retirees on our plan increases.
The size of the retiree group will not be as controlled as the employee
group, Once they =ire on the plan they stay on until age 65. The group will
continue to grow larger, Without charging the retirees a rate that will cover
our added liability for their claims, this has potential of destroying the
financial validity of our insurance program, The decision at hand is one that
will have a major impact in years to come,
QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
Should we decide to pursue the benefit addition of retirees, a major critical
question is how to actually define 'retiree';
o Would this include only those permanent employees who meet the TH RS
and Fire Pension requirements for retirement?
o Would we cover retirees only until they become eligible for Medicare
at age f5,41
o Would we cover all "retirees" equally no matter how long they worked
for the City?
o Would it cover all individuals who leave the service of the City
between the ages of 50 A 65, regardless of whether or not they meet
Fire Pension or TM RS retirement requirements;
o Would it include only employees who terminate after having worked for
the City for a set amount of time, i.e., 10 years of service.
o Would we cover the spouses and dependents, if they were younger than
50, and continue to cover them after the retiree becomes eligible for
Medicare?
There are other questions that need to be answered if retirees are to be
covered,
o Who would pay for the retiree's coverage retiree or the City?
Memo to Betty McKean
R[; Adding Retirees to Insurance Plan
Page 5
n What happens when an employee reaches 65 and the spouse is younger?
would rqe continue to cover the spouse and/or dependents until he/she
is eligible for medicare?
In light of the rising costs of health insurance, and the fact that we have
recently had to substantially increase our rates to our employees based on our
own claims, it is my recommendation that we maintain our current policy of
only providing benefits to the people in the City's service. Should the
decision of the Council be to add this benefit, we should research various
alternatives that would help restrict our liability, Some of those
alternatives might be,,
o To match coverage with their years of service, for example, an
employee who works 10 years, will be covered for 10 years,
o Stop coverage at age 66;
o Have a different rate schedule for retirees to assist us in covering
our liability;
SUMMARY
Since adding retirees to our insurance program is going to have an impact on
employee and city contribution rates to the program, it is important to keep
in mind the revenue problems we have been experiencing and our difficulty in
stabilizing rates.
An additional consideration is the impact the retirees may have on ability to
secure reasonable bids on our insurance program in the future, Larger
insurance companies will not cover a group if the average age is 45 or older.
Maintaining retirees would increase the average age of our group considerably.
once again, my recommmendation is that we maintain our current policy regarding
retirees on our insurance program, However, if the decision is otherwise, I
would hope that we could explore alternatives that would protect as much as
possible the liability of these claims for the City so that we may continue to
offer the best health care package. In a time when benefits are a key factor
in recruitment, I feel that it is important that our health insurance plan be
one that is positive, Being able to continue oftering reasonable insurance
rates to current employees is most important in recruiting top people,
if you need further clarification regarding any of these points, please feel
free to contact me,
G
a iryn rey, ersonne -m n s ra or
YU:ab
16221?
Attachment
LD
CJrYot VENroNf rBXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TEl.EPNONE (817) 5668200
i
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 9, 1984
TU: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: Charles S. Watkins, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: DISCUSS ANNEXATION OF A 53 ACRE TRACT OF [,AND
PROPOSED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 377 SOUTH OF
BRUSH CREEK ROAD
The preliminary plan of this 53 acre tract shows approximately
45 lots with a typical one (1) acre size. Approximately 1/2 of
the proposed subdivision is already within the City limits.
The zoning for that portion inside the City is agricultural (A)
zoning classification. The developers plan to tie into the
Argyle water system but will install the waterlines and fire
hydrants to City of Denton standards. Sewer service is to be
by individual septic systems. The internal street system will
be in accordance with estate subdivision standards.
Although, Brush Creek Road has not been formally adopted as the
southern route for Loop 288, the developer has been requested
to dedicate sufficient R.O,W. for the Loop along the north side
of the development.
Charles S. Watkins
gd
0125g
N
00' 5056" L
l~sd a•{ •wlu ._..~..._..~'oo"~ e~so'~ ono n W, 'to
l•aa-•--•.. _,g RUSM'4Rf.l
y y
IN $6, 59130. 9
717
4, 1 IV
` • i ~ ~ x,..11.`
! ° ~ R I t
71 ~
r
l! A ! r ~
' 2' CIO' ) r,~ \
IX /I
t J f `.t. , i a
7
I
III
Cy 7' f/r 8
y
•tl~ ,
P ~
.I ~ IY lil.p
°IffJ! / I t
IJ,4 III
uw.•Pr{dui.ii_ n._. lS 41
II
,
~q
.f
t 1
&36
'5,
M E M 0 R A N D U M
DATE: December 14, 1983
T0: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
Charles Watkins, Senior Planner
RE: Receive a report concerning the status of our
application for a Community Development block
Grant (CDBG)
The City of Denton received notification earlier this year of its
entitlement status for 1984 Community Development Block Grant
funding. The Planning and Community Development Department is
currently-preparing a Housing Assistance Plan which must be
reviewed and ap roved by the Housing and Urban Development
Department (HUDg prior to submission of our application.
ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
All proposed activities.must: (1) benefit the low and moderate
income persons; or (2) aid in the prevention or elimination of
slums or-blight; or (3) meet other community development needs of
particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and
immediate threat to the health and welfare of the community.
Proposed projects are classified into four categories:
1. Public facilities/services
2. Housing
3. Economic Development
4. Community Development Planning/Capacity Building
Examples of eligible activities under each category follow.
1. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
* Acquisition of real property necessary to install or
improve public facilities (easements, etc.);
* Water and sewer facilities, including storm sewers;
* Street improvements, including paving, lighting, curbs,
r utters, sidewalks, and handicap ramps,
* on-residential centers for senior citizens and/or the
handicapped;
Memo to 0, Chris Hartung
CDDG Status report
December 14, 1983
Page 3
31 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
* Technical assistance;
* Loans,
* Loan guarantees'
* Interest Subsides;
* Land and Building Acquisition;
* Public Facilities Improvements.
4. PROJECT PLANNING DEVELOPMENT
* Comprehensive Communityy Development Planning;
* Development of Policy-Planning Management capacity to
rationally and effectively conduct community development
projects;
* Preparation of elements of a community development pla-,;
or strategy.
5. GENERAL PROJECT ADMINISTRATION (Applicable to all Project
Activities)
General management, oversight and coordination;
*
* Provision of information and resources to residents and
citizen organizations concerning CDBG activities;
* Reasonable costs of environmental studies; and
* Costs for professional services that are associated with
project administration.
Prior to the submission to HUD for its annual grant, the grantee
must:
1. Develop a proposed statement of community development
objectives and projected :•se'of funds, including the
following items:
A. .The community development objectives the grantee
proposes to pursue.
B. mite community development activities the grantee
proposes to carry out with anticipated CDBG funds,
to address its identified community development
objectives. Each such activity must address at
least one of the broad national objectives and be an
eligible activity.
2. Meet the following citizen participation requirements:
A. Furnish citizens with information concerning the
amount of CDBG funds expected to be available for
community development and housing activities, an6
the range of activities that may be undertaken with
those funds.
Memo to C. Chris Hartung
CDBG Status report
December 14, 1983
Page 2
* Neigghborhood facilities designed to provide health,
social, recreational, or sim lar community services for
residents of a project area;
* Removal of architectural barriers (e.g. activities to
remove materials and barriers restricting the mobility
of the elderly and handioapped);
* Clearance activities; including the demolition and
removal of buildings as well as the moving of structures
to other sites,
* Flood and drainage facilities of a local nature;
* Parks, playgrounds and other recreational facilities
that are designed for the use of residents within the
project area.
The following activities are eligible but must meet special
procedural conditions before they can be funded;
* Fire protection facilities and equipment;
Parking facilities,
Solid waste disposal facilities.
Public service activities are eligible If they have not been
provided by the community during the past year, However,
public service activities provided during the past year that
are, discontinued due to events beyond the community's control
may be eligible for funding. The amount of funds for public
service activities may not exceed ten percent of the total
amount of funds requested.
These activities must be located in or serve areas where
other activities included in the Community Development and
Housing Plan are being carried out.
2. HOUSING.
* Real property acquisition;
* Rehabilitation, clearance, demolition, and/or removal of
privately owned buildings;
* Rehabilitation of publicly-owned or acquired propezries
for use or resale in providing assisted housing;
* Non-maintenance types of housing modernization (e.g.
weatherization);
* Code enforcement for deteriorating or deteriorated
property within the project area;
* Relocation assistance for displaced individuals,
families, etc., when appropriate to the community
develc; ment program.
* Replacement housing or "last resort" housing assistance
for individuals, families, businesses, etc., when they
are displaced due to another eligible activity.
* Historic preservation activities.
Memo to G. ah'rio Hartung
CDBG,status report
December 14, 1983
Page G
B. oflcitizenssonothepgrante tsrhousingoandicommunityws
development needs.
C. Publish Its proposed statement of community develop-
ment objectives and projected use of funds so as to
afford affected citizens an opportunity to examine
the statement's contents, and to provide comments on
the proposed statement and on the grantee's community
development performance.
D. Prepare its final statement of community development
objectives and projected use of funds. Once the
grantee has completed the citizen participation re-
quirements, the grantee must consider any such com-
views received and if the grantee deems
ments and
appropriate modify the proposed statement. The
grantee shall make the final statement available to
the public.
The city should receive somewhere in the neighborhood of $610,000
in Community Development Block Grant funds. HUD will advise us of
the exact amount ib January 19841
CSW;lc
r
Clry CQuiVC1L MINUTRS
NOVember li, 1943
Pst£Sc.NTt MambirsSAlkoro, Garton,PChewreHoprini~aandgSCiph~nanoil
n
City Manager, City Attorney and City $$Oratory
The Council convened into the work session to consider initiation of
annexation proosedings on a tract of land, approximately 60 sores In
size located along the north aide of- tae oast-west section of P,M.
2181 welch was peeress. for aevelepuat of a manufactured nouaing
subdivision or mobile nome park.
prooverview ximity of Of CiCn*
location Watkins, Senior Planner,
and an
the tract, Proposed Land au es presented
ty
utilities.
Council Member Hopkins stated that he believed the City had all it
could handle now,
Mayor Pro 'rem diddlsspe;get. asked now elooe the development was to
the Hickory Creek sewer line,
watkins responded approximately 5UU feet,
Council Member darton stated that many developecs were expecting to
oa annexed if they oegan mobile home parks and would then a granted
the appropriate zoning,
Council Member Chew stated that he felt the City needed to nave
control over the land,
for that
out Council
Police to patrol couple and forogarbage
Would r be odifficult stated
pick up. pp and than
permitspetortmobils, home parts
totkhave srequests t was for especial prolem
refused,
Mayor Stewart stated that the Council had asked Watkins to prepare a
map of all of the mobile houe parks which the City Council had
approved in the last-2 or 3 years,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesparger stated it would be wiae to wait until
the mobile home subdivision was approved,
council Member darton asked it the Council could declare a
moratorium on mobile home park permits,
City Attorney C. J, Taylor responded that the Council could delay
issuing permits for a reasonable period of time, Such as 3 to b
months while the mobile home ordinance was being prepared.
Mayor Stewart stated that no believed the Council should wait until
the map of the recently approved parks was prepared and the revised
mobile home ordinance was approved,
Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council needed to find out
the percentage of occupancy in existing mobile nome parks.
Council Member Stephens stated that he would like to see the issue
of the sturdiness of mobile homes addressed in the revised ordinance,
City Manager Chris Hartung stated that the enforcement of the
ordinance would be a problem.
Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported
that the ordinance could be more strict on the quality of the mobile
home units. The problem would be witn the park management.
r
City council Mintuee
Mooting of Novambfr 15, 1983
Page No
pntne covissa ordinance aould require the
yor $ C w at asked' It
mapacks wouldb maintain n ase Cprhoblime Stated with a tvalfic e and tgarbage h pick 000114 home
mayor viewedrtby k041 Planninthe g and iZoni i bCommission rbeforee ibhawas
be
presented to Cho council tot a pcoval. The Mayor than asked what
toe Couaoi's wishes ware for Initiating annexation pcocefdings on
Cho propoefd tract,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddissporger stated that no felt the Staff /Jhould
keep a close watch in this particular aces,
80tiOn cattitd~ 5 top ti with Council Members pStophonswand Chow ocasting
the nay votes,
g, Inc Council held a diSauasion of the new user toe rates in
tna City of Denton.
Assistant City cianagor dotty McKean distributed coplea of tilt draft
ordinance, minutes grow the Bosco of Adjustment, tno Building code
doord ant the electrical Code doara, Tnis was a continuation of
toe dIscuasion that was hold at Coe November 1, L963 Council meeting,
Cho that area consicated was then of plat tees, Council ,`itwbtt
fee
Stephen$
highat The tConsnsus$ out the Counctiil iwas oChat tihnitial
wag too stated
should be Lowered to $75.
Under Police i** , the nI050 to $2the Council wag to increase the
warrant service the tStaffuintendedkro Dcoll tment, cococzendedb$5 animalnregistration
tee,
Assistant City Mnagor Rick Svenle stated that the cdllection would
be done through the Humane Society, Ift an anim l afeempbeufore ,the
animal would be released.
to pay the Council Member SStephens
ideait the City had not done this
tne ag~dd
ab
PCGYiOUSIY and Senior Administrative Assistant dill Angelo responded gnat the City
nad required alane were Opposed registration, colbut it lecting the a toea~cminated as the
veterin
The Council then considered rho food for electrical permits.
Assistant City )Aanager tees. Otndc l cities Stated Word trying proposed
to p g0 tofaf fee would $lU plus Which
was cased on a percentage of square tootago,
It was
coos rat$ ordinance until the December L6 meetingctricai fee
port the
The Council then adyourned into Executive Session to discuss legal
matters, teal estate, personnel, and board appointments. NO
official action was taken,
the Council then convened into the regular meeting at 7:00 p.m, in
too Council chambers.
M
City Council Kintvoe
1y$'}
Keoias of November l51
paxe 'rnroe
p"sENTi Koabtc~ ewart, , MAnd ayor pklge Tom diddleapeior' Council
City KsaaAe , City Attorney, and City secretary
AgSgHp, Council Kosberg Barton, Stephens, and Chow
The Council Goaeiderod approval of the Kinuto$ of the
Special Called Keating of October 25, 198 4 row the Minutes was
olsop*Vgor presented. motion carried unanimously.
Z, Consent Agenda
council Kembe s Barton, Stephens, and Chew joined approve Coeaeng,Aganda,
carried munanimousiyord second to sPP
motion KIddl46P*VQt
Consent AgendaI
A. Sidsi
1 Bid 1 9200 - Sectionalizer
21 Bid 1 9201 - Annual maintenance on typewriter
service
3, Bid Y 9204 - Traffic controller
4. Bid 0 9205 - Uniforms - Firs Department
B, Plata and deplatsi
1, Approval of the preliminary replat of lots 0 and
Addition. Me and
z
e. Approval of the preliminary plat of Denton County
Comm~$$ion Addition. approval)an~ing
S, Approval of the preliminary replat of lot 1,
Adkisson Addition. (The planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Cozy Oaks
Addition. ('ine Pianning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
5, Approval of the final replat of lots 1d, 2K and
and Loningncommissioncocommenaatapproval,PLanaitg
G. Change orders:
1. Consider approval of Change Ocd8r 015, Bid f
8753, Comp an T43458 10 reatmentOrPLant Conslim,torque
motors control and project time extension, (The
Puulic Utility Boaro will consider this item at
their meeting on November L4.)
2 FUtdhasa approval 58171 hto eDiorder 01, Bid # 9138,
ckeaon Construction
Company.
City council 410twes
64ssttag of NOVember lzi, 1983
Page your
31 Public heart"$$
A. The Cnail oonsidered the petition of the orratii
Denton Arts Council requesting histotto Iarastk (H G in
dodi nat:opA at the s0y theist odxaer of hell Avlau# a kiafivf
Strait, The property to the location of the old City of Denton
warenouae and machine shop and is more particularly described as
lots 1 through 8 of the Railroad Addition, h-~V
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Mr. Clovis Morviseon, spoke in favor of the petition and
ongratulated the City Council on the Texas Municipal League award
or thetr support of the arts, Mr, Morrissoh than gave a histor Gf
the building stating that the old City warst,ouse and power plant
were built when d, w. McKenzie was Mayor, Mayor McKenzie had
travelled to New York to pick upp the genorators, This had marked a
milestone for Denton, The arahiteot for the building was Greenwood
and the builder was Lakey, The building nod been decommissioned
several years ago, The request for nistocic landmark zoning for the
diesel plant was oaeed on the architecture, The City nod contracted
witn a diesel generator firm and had built the buildingQ are to".
rho buildings had been designed by a Milwaukee Srah3teat. tlr,
Morrisaon than qquoted trom a letter which he had received frog Mr.
Peter Flagg Maxison stating the historic value of this particular
type of arenitecture in Texas.
Ms. Mary Hardin, Chairperson of the HiStorio Landmark Commission,
Spoke in favor of the petition stating that the approval of the
zoning would snow a concern tot Denton's place in hiatdry,
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the puolio hearing.
Dania* Spivey, Planning 'Technician, reported c: hat 4 reply forms had
oral mailed with 1 returned in favor, U in opposition and 1
undecided, The present zoning was light ihdustrialR if the historic
landmark zoning were granted it. would overlay the LI zoning. The
Sesquicentennial Committee had adopted this aS one of their proaects,
1. Tne Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving nistoric landmark (H) zoning designation at the southeast
:ornar of dell Avenue and Hickory Street.
The following ordinance was presentedi
83.125
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNA'PING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BELL
AVENUE AND HICKORY STREET (THE OLD CITY OF DENTON WARE HOUSE
AND MACHINE SHOP) IN THE CITY OF DENTON, OENTON COUNTY
'rr.)AS AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER ORDINANCE NO. dO-36
(ARTICLE 1E8A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING OROINANCE); AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance, On roll
call Voce Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Milord "aye",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye", ,lotion
carried unanimously,
6. The Council considered the petition of the Greater
Denton Arts Council requesting historic landmark (H) zoning
designation at the southwest corner of Bell Avenue and Hickory
Stt-eat. The property is the location of the old City of Denton
power plant. H-3U
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
1
city Council Mintues
Hestia of Novemoer L5, 1983
Page Ffve
,polo in favoriok thee Petition and asked for the Council's support.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
returned pin favor, 0t in oppositionpandfl undsoided beat mailea with 3
11 Tne Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving historic Landmark (H) atoning designation an the southwest
corner or bell Avenue and Hickory Street.
The following ordinance was presentedi
83-126
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 89LL
AVENUE AND HICKORY STREET Id THE CITY OF DEN'TON, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER ORDINANCE 80.
du-30 (ARTICLE Y8A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING OROtNANCE)l
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Alford motion, Stapnens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
II S.C• "aye", "aye",
vote Barton 11ay•11 d Hopkin'lay*' IIa~+e ppheats "aye Kiddlesperget ays, Gnaw and Mayor Stewart aye Motion
carried unanimously.
C. rho council considered the ppetition of Douglas and
Lynn Ebersole requesting historic landmark (H) atoning designation at
630 Grove Street. The property is more partieularf.y deecrioea as
lot 1, clock e, of the Woodland Addition, H-31
The Mayor opened the public uearing,
Ms.. Mary Hardin, Chairperson of the Historic Landmark Commission,
asked the Council to vote in favor of this petition, Historic
landmark designation zoning had previously beau granted to another
home on Grove Stroet. The Historic Landmark Commission was
+ interested in preserving homes Ionian Were exemplary of architecture
of their day and in preserving neighborhoods, Ms. Hardin asked
j people tram the neighborhood in that audience who were in favor of
1 the petition to stand.
mr. John Lawhon, Texas Women Is University attorney, spoke in
opposition stating that the property was within the TWU master plan
which had been on the With to city since 1977. Mr. Lawnon also
stated that nib observation wen that this was not a historic
structure due to Cnanges and modifications whicn had been made and
the home was used as rental property, Mr. Lawhon concluded by
stating tnat the designation Would hamper IWU's ton,,, range plans for
this area.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denise Spivey reported that 12 reply forms had been mailed With 4
returned in favor and 1 in opposition. The present zoning at the
location was MF-1 and the area was designated as low intensity in
the Denton Development Guido. It the petition wets granted,
permission prior to remodeling the exterior of the structure would
be required. The structure met the criteria for historic landmark
designation. The Historic Landmark Commission had voted 7 to 2 in
tavor of the petition and the Pianning and Zoning Commission nad
voted 5 to 0 in favor,
city Council Miatues
Motion of November l5, 19d3
Page Six
Mayor Pro Tea itiddlosperger asked if rho Historto Landmark
commission nad any plans to rocommond other houses in this area tot
tno dosigaatioa,
Spivey responded tnaC there was 1, otner application before the
Commission trom this area.
Mayor Pro Tun Aiddlespergor asked it the house could be moved if TWU
wjlntod to develop on this property.
Spivey replied that the house could be moved through procedures in
the Hiatoric Landmark Commission,
Mayor Stewart commended that as a state institution, TWU nod the
rignt of condemnation.
'rho following ordinance was presented,
83-
AN ORDINANCE DF,SICNA'TINO 630 GA04 ST"FT IN T" CITY OF
DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AS A HISTORIC I.AHr,MA" UNDER
OKMANCE 440. 80-30 (Ait'r1CLii 'W OF THw 1744PREHENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE)m AND PKOVIDINC AN EFFECTIVE Dili.
Barton motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "nay", Stephens "aye", Alford "ney",
diddlespecger "nay", Chow "nay", and Mayor Stewart "nay", motion
failed 5 to 2 with Council Members Hopkins, Alford, diddlesperger,
(;new and Mayor Stewart casting the nay votes.
0. The Council considered tno petition of Richard a.
Cushman requesting a specitic use permit cc lodate an Individual
mobile home in a commercial (C) zoning district, The property
totals approximately one acre in size and is located along the north
side of Spencer Roaa, approximately 404 feet west of Loop 288. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission cecommends approval.)
The Mayor opened the public nearing.
4a, Carolyn Cushman, petitioner, spoke in favor stating that the
request ties for temporary use only, This wag an 8 acre tract to be
used for business purposes and she and Mr. Cushman would like to
build a home on one acre at the back but would like to build their
business first. rhey were requesting. permission to move a mobile
Moms onto the property to live in temporarily, There were three
other mobile homes in this vicinity.
Mayor Pro rem itiddlesperger asked why type of business would be on
the property.
wg, Cushman responded that cney planned to build a roller skating
rink along the Loop 288 frontage.
mayor Pro Tem etiddlesperger asked when the CUahman'g tnougnt chey
could build their home.
Ms, Cushman stated that they wOUid like CO start CMe MOMS but were
naving utility problems. There was a well and an existing septic
system on the property and they were in tee processing of trying to
got City water and sewerage. rho Denton County Electric Cooperative
owned the 12 acres north of their property and she felt that when
water was extended to this property, their property would also have
water,
Council Member Hopkins asked if the Cusoman's felt that cney would
need the temporary permit for 4 to 6 monchs,
City Cqua it Mintues
Meeting of November 15, 1983
Page Seven
Me, Cuslaaa respoaded that an* felt it would take approximately 6
months to actually build the business end they would need the permit
tot 11 to lb months,
Mayor Stewart stated that his only question would be what was
temporery. If the r• uest was approved, it would stay that way
until it was disapproved,
Council Member Hopkins stated that the staff recomrendatioa was for
3 years.
Ms. Cushman responded that the recommendation was for 3 years but
she And iir. Cushman hoped that it would not take that. Long. Aa.
engineer was working on the drainage problems and the laying of the
water had sewer lines. As, soo as the business was finished, they
would apply tot a permit to build a horse.
No one spoke in opposition.
me Mayor oloaed the public aearibg.
Elizabeth Evans, Flemming and Community Development intern, reported
that 5 reply forms ash been matted with 0 returned in favor And 0 in
opposition. Existing land use in the area was a recreational
vehicle used As a family residence and storage and sale of portable
signs. The Denton Development guide recommended high intensity tot
this area. The request tot the specttic sae permit was tot use of a
moods none for a single family residence. Water and sewer problems
nccesaitated conditions for plat approval. PSZ recommendeo approval
by a vote of 4 to L subject to compliance with the conditions that
the lots must have City plat approval, only one mobile home on the
lot, and the specific use permit woula expire in 3 years.
rho Mayor stated that he was conderasa about the legality of such a
temporary permit. Could the parcel be rezoned or cou14 it be done
through the specific use permit.
City Attorney C. J. 'raylot responded that this permit was for a
specif use of land tot a specific time period and was not permanent
zoning.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesparger asked if this would create an
enforcement problem.
Taylor responded that enforcement would oa done through utility
aetvices when the specific use permit ordinance expired.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a specific use permit to locate an individual mobile home
on property located along the north side of spencer Road,
approximately 404 fast west of Loop 188.
1ne tcilowing ordinance was presenteaa
83-L27
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMI[ AiQ AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS
ADOPTED AS AN APPBNUIX rO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF rHE
CITY OF DENTON, UXAS, BY ORDINANCE N0. 69-1, AND AS SAID
MAP APPLIES 10 APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE IN tI'ZE BEING LOCA'rE0
ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF SPENCER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 404
FEET WEST OF LOOP 188, AS SHOWN ON 'rHE rAX RECORDS OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote Barton "aye" Hopkins "aFG", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddlesperaer "ayes', Chew "aye', and Mayor Stewart "aye". Motion
carried unanimously,
city Coualil Miatue•
Meetiai oqt Noveabet 15, 19tH
Page Eight
g, rho CouaCil Considered the petition of 'Coe D. Jester,
Jr. requesting a Oman a to toosat from at* is family W-7)t to Cos
li ht industrial (1.l o Uatifl4 floe at 9
property is located on the east side of Frame Street approximately
G5u toot north of loot "Kinney Street, t-Lb14
Too Mayor opened the public hearing. favo
r at
stati ariuoox 300ttootQlot~iatie was requtstistLight indusatrial goal a6 rb~~ut
Warrrehouses oaathe pvopotty, abLightbindust ialwzoning twas virtue ly
mad aZOniagth~iia/oa hi cram haxaiprn fsoo°patifonti.plSaaca
distributed photographs of houses sad businesses is the area and
stated that no new building mad been done is this tree since 1967
and, he doubted Cast aay• new tingletam#ly nou*tag would 'be built
here. A statement had been made at the P&Z meeting that he would
receive ialwdapinityf#ttetihItzhadn%ean puroloiii4duas rsai~2aoHAW Late
Jester stated that he personally bid not believe that it Was a
concern of the City if the property increased in value or clot. Mr.
Jester also stated that this zoning would open the area as there was
light industrial zoning across the street. Regarding the homes in
tae area, mt. Jester stated that the results of a recent Survey
homes
apawas rtment expected
ue40-451
units,
to y tno increase of factor
oby a September expected
in Denton
Mayor Pro 'Cam Riddlesparger asked if this property was close to tae
creek.
Mr. Jester responded yssl there Wad one owner between this property
and the Creek.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlasperger asked if the property would flood.
Jester responded not the Staff had indicated that it was about L00
feet out of the flood zone. There had been some.discussioa as to
add
whether ere planted to build on the property operty Council that no Planned to
they sell it. Mr. Jester assured
build the mini-warehouses on the property.
No one spoke in opposition.
i
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Jeff that 14 Meyer,
reply fore Director hadtb~n anmailedaWith Zoning
returnedi in iot vor, This
was. indicative or the problem in this type of area Wnere most homes
were occupied by renters and the owners were the persona notified of
the zoning change requests. The request mad serious ditfstences
With Guide thCallealof ratthe lip Prfor otection s or QBoldere nDenton eighborhoods 0eyelopment
specifically that industrial development adjacent to the south and
east was to be cloSely monitored, including that industrial
development would be limited to the area east of Woodrow Lone,
p proval of this petition would violate these policies. t'ne po.'cy
also prohibited access through residential streets and access to
Frame intrusion Street Was a single totOUgh residential area Whilee it We$ true that bthere
was light industrial zoning across the street, that area itself
Would be impacted and the problem compounded if more Light
industrial Was added, if the area across the street and along
McKinney developed, theta would be a nigh concentration of
industrial or commercial uses in an area Which was bns`hiat d aswlow
intensity. Many types of Uses which could be done
tnrough to strict single site family cohousing. This ntrol, fencing, i W and om placould cement,
handsd compatiole
Planned Development was the way to accomplish this.
city council Mintuse
Meetia of November 15, 1983
Page N ne
council Member Hopkins asked if the planning and zoning Commiasion
had discussed a planned development for this area.
Meyer responded no.
Alford motion for approval of the zoning request. Motion died for
lack of a second.
nartoa motion, Chew Second to deny. Action to deny carried 5 to 2
with Council Members Alford and Hopkins casting the nay votes,
F, The Council considered the petition of 'Tom Fouts
requesting a ohaa¢e in zoning from agricultural (A) to commercial
(C) on to approxiimattly 6.769 gore tract in the A. Hill Survey,
Abstraot 623. The property is located approximately 800 feet west
of Teayley sad Sam the so to side of he 1-35t; service road between Larim
6409 Road, Z-160
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr, Tom Fouts; repraaeatidg tha owners, spoke in favor of thi
petition stating that the area to the north and west was zoned
commercial with 1/2 tote zoned for metal retail. When the request
was made it included some area wghich was already zoned due to a
lack of legal definition of what was zoned commercial and what was
zoned agricultural. Apartments were building built in the
surrounding area. The owner was concerned that Sam Bass and Teasley
constituted a large area that did not nave a street through. Jason
Street is projected to go through which would give better access to
Interstate 35 and keep traffic oft of Teasley.
CounctL Member Stephens stated that the exit showed a very sharp
turn off of IH-35 onto Jason.
council Member Hopkins asked now tar beyond the service road
intersection was the exit.
At, Fouts rapped that it was several nundred feet. The traffic
problem had been addressed by the State Highway Department.
Mayor Pro Tom Aiddlespergee asked how tar$a was Jason Street,
Mr. Fouts responded that Jason was a collector street with 60 feet
of right-ot-way and 40 foot back to back curb and gutter.
Mayor Stewart asked who owned the rest of the property,
routs responded that the people he was representing 411 of the
property that was effected by the commercial zoning. Part of the
property was already zoned commercial and tits clients were
requesting commercial zoning for the remainder.
No one spoke in opposition.
fns ,Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Development Aeview Planner, stated that 8 reply forma
had been mailed with 2 returned in favor and 0 in opposition. The
easement which Mr. FouCS~discussed was a private easement and not
dedicated. The access can not be guaranteed without planned
development zoning. With commercial zoning there would be more
opportunity for development which would mean more dollars for the
potentiaL extensions of Jason. Staff wanted to point out that it the
interior of tna property was not developed, individual lot owners
would require public street frontage along Jason and there would be
no guarantee that the extension would be made, as iH-35 provided
adequate public access. This was a moderate intensity area and
commercial zoning was consiatent with surrounding zoning and Long
City Coundil MihCUes
Meeting of November 15, 1983
Page Ten
range plans of the Denton Development Guide. The staff felt that
planned development zoning might be more appropriate to control
internal access and circulation. The Planning and boning discussed
the Acosta issue and agreed that 6 more acres would not warrant a
planned development,
Council Member atophens asked if a traffic study had been conducted
in the area.
Ellison responded that no oouo'c was done. The Traffic engineer telt
that the extension of Jason might have some impact for the
development in the immediate proximity of Jason but its overall
impact on Teasley was indeterminable.
Council Member Stephens stated that if the area were to have high
density residential development it would impact Teasley.
`Mayor Stewart asksc if it would be to the Owner$ advantage to put a
street in.
Ellison responded yes.
Mayor Stewart stated that there would not be acedei to the back of
the property witnout a street.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlosperger stated that the City could insist upon
the street.
Ellison responded no, not witnout planned devo,, Aent. If the
developers subdivided the interior, mach individual lot or platted
tract would nave to nave a public street across the frontage. Tne
land would be platted In such a way so that all of the frontage
would come otf of IH-35 and could avoid ooze off-site improvements,
Tne new Subdivision Rules and Regulations there were discretionary
provisions wnicn require platting or building of public tacilities
otf-Site if the P&Z and Council felt it was reasonable,
1, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in Zoning from agricultural (A) to commercial (C)
on property located approximately 800 feet west of Teasley Lane on
the south side of the 1-35E service road between Teasley Lane and
Sam Bass Road.
The following ordinance was prosentedi
83-12B
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OE DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO,
o9-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES 'TO AN APPROXIMATELY 6,769
ACRE TRACT IN 'IHE A. KILL SURVEY, ABSTRACT 623 LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY $00 FEET WEST OF TEASLEY LANE ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF THE 1.35E SERVICE ROAD deTWEEN TEASLtY LAND AND SAM
BASS ROADI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Riadlesperger motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote Barton aye Hopkins "aye", Stephens aye Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew aye , and Mayor Stewart aye . Motion
carried unanimously,
4. Ordinances
A, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
establishing new user fee rates in the areas of building fees, weed
cutting Library, Parrs and Recreation, Public Works, barricade
inspections, fire Inapcations, ambulance service, platting and
zoning fees, sign permits, Animal Control, dnd Police services in
the City of Denton,
Cityy Coup it Mibtues
Meetin November 15. 1983
Page 8faven
Mayor Stewart stated that the electrical service fees had been
de etea from the ordinance as presented.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this ordinance nad been
discussed at length.
Council Member Stephens stated that question$ dad been raised
regarding the fees for plats and replats.
§tepneas motion. Hopkins second to remove the plat one teplat tats
from the ordinance for disoussion. Motion carried b to 1 with Mayor
Stewart voting nay.
Cqunail Member Stephens stated that the Current tea for initial
plats was $5$ and the conSUltaat's recommendation Was $650 and tba
staff recommendation varind from $150 to $650. Council Member
Stephens suggested that this be taken in steps. 'the Smaller playa
less than 3 lots or less than 5 acres should be assessed a fee 01
$75.00 and the larger plats be not more than $100. The increases
should be implemented by degree.
Council Member Hopkins stated that this was an adjusted program over
a $ year period. The $100 fee would be gradually increased to the
3350 fee but de felt the initial Cost Should be reduced.
Council Mamoer Stephens also stated that the increase from $110 to
$650 for replats was too large of an increaat and was afraid this
would-be an inhibition:
Mayor Stewart asked for Council Member Stepnsos's suggestion.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the tees should begin at a lower
rate.
Council Member datCOn dtatad the Council should remember that the
cost was there whatnot it was borne by the individual or the
taxpayers.
Mayor Stewart stated that the City Was subsidizing the builders.
Council Member Stepnens stated that it would expand the tax base if
the Council Would encourage the cuntingeat construction and too
large of a tae would be a burden.
Mayor Stewart stated that It Was obvious On the dnart wnich showed
costs in 1987-88 it fee was still not going to cover the costs which
were borne by tn'. City on plats and replats. this ordinance was
merely a start to be Spread over a 5 year period of time to getting
the charges equal to the cost of the Service.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespargar stated that he did not have a problem
with the initial plat coat.
Council Member Stephens asked about the larger lots.
mayor Stewart stated that the coat Would still not be recouped. He
felt this was a reasonable strating increment which could be cnanged
is necessary.
Council Member Stephens aaxed if consultation had been held With
trade people to see if the tees Would be an inhibitor.
Council Member Chew asked what Would be an appropriate tee for a
teplat.
Council Member Hopkins stated that he felt the proposed fee was
extremely high and would like to hear from anyone in the audience
Who wanted speak to this issue.
City Council Miatues
Meeting of November 15, 1983
Page Twelve
,yr. Robert Sags cautioned the Council about lyumpia into a nigher
fee structure without a survey of other cities. Kt, Sage stated
that he old not think the Council wanted to discoucsge opportunities
for the City to expand.
Mayor Stewart cespondad that a survey had been conducted.
Council' Member Altocd stated, that s consultant had been hired to
determine what the actual costs Mete for Various City services. Ina
taxpayerr were paying for the serVicea at the present time,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlospererc stated that he believed the fees were
Lair and they were being implemented o *T 5 years,
Riddlesparger motion, Batton second to approve the list of tees as
submitted.
Stephen motion, Chew second to amend the motion to reads
plats/other $100 instead of $350
i r•plrta/other
without notification $200 inatosd of $650
plats/other
without notification $100
Motion to amend the main motion failed 4 to 3 with Council 4eabers
Barton, Altord, Riddlesparger and Mayor Stewart Besting the nay
votes,
Vote on the main motion to approve the list of teas as submitted
passed 4 to 3 with Council Members Stephens, Chew and dopeins
casting the nay 4aiii;
The following ordinance was presentodi ,
83-119
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES TO dE PAID TO THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Riddlespetgar motion, Barton second to adopt the„ordinance. on coil
call vote Barton "aye". Hopkins "aye". Stephens nay", Alford "aye",
Riddlesparger "Aye", Chew "nay", and Mayor Stewart "aye". ,(Orion
carried 5 to 2 witn Council Members Stapnene and Chew casting the
nay voted.
B. 'the Council considered adoption of as ordinance
regarding the Texas Municipal Retirement System updated service
credits and increased retirement annuities,
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the Staff was %lary pleased
to bring this ordinance to the Council. The new provisioas would
benefit employees who were nearing retirement and employees wno had
already retired. This provided for changes in the machod of
computation of their oenefita. This had been approved in tae budget
and would go into ettect January 1, 1984. ,
The t011owing ordinance was prasented;
83-130
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND ALLOWING, UNDER rKE ACT
GOVU.NING THE 'TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, "UPUATED
SERVICE CREDITS" IN SAID SYSTEM FOR SERVICE PE"ORMED BY
QUALIFYING MEMBERS OF SUCH SYSTEM WHO PRESENTLY ARE IN THE
LOYKENT OF THE CITY OF DENTONI PROVIDING FOR INCREASED
PRIOR AND CURRENT SERVICE ANNUITIES FOR RETIREES AND
BENEFICIARIES OF DECEASED RETIREES OF THE CITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH ACTIONS.
City council Mintues
Meeting of November 15, 1983
Page T trteen
I
Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordiaaacs., Oa roll call
vote Barton ay• , Aopkins ale Stephens ay• i Alf?rd aYS ,
Riddleeperger "aye"] Cnew 'aye', and Mayor Stewart aye'. Mo ton
carried unanimously.
C, rho Council considered adoption of an ordinance making
the frontage roads on 1.35 one-way from U.S. 77 north to the City
limits.
PAt the
City hangg*r at H the ungState stated Deppartment it at wpHs On the ighway$ aSad 9144
ublic
rraaaportation. They were is the progres of preparing plans for the
rebuilding of Interstate 3$ from Denton to Caineaville and had
Cs nested that the Counetl ooaatder restrtoting service road to one
We traffic upon completion of the construction.
Council Member Stephens stated that he would like for the record to
show that this ordinance would go into effect when the construction
was completed and all other service roads to the county line were
one way,
City Attorney Taylor stated that the.ordinance was written with an
effective data to Coincide with the time when tae si no were in
place. The signs would be installed after the completion of the
project,
City Mane. er Hartung reported that the staff would forward a letter
to the State Oapartment of Highways and Public Transportation
stating iIhe conditions of the ordinance that the effective date
would be upon the completion of the Interstate 35 rebuilding and
would be for only chose service roads from U.S. 77 north to the
Denton city limits.
Tne following, ordinance was presentea;
83-131
AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE FRONTAGE ROADS OF I.H. 35
BETWEEN 'THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT LINE AND U.S. 17 TO ONE-wAY
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, PROHISIIING TRAFFIC FROM SOUTH TO NORTH
ON THE WBSTERN FRONTAGE ROAD AND FROM NORTH 'TO SOUTH ON
EASTERN FRONTAGE ROAD; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO
EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00); PROVIDING A
Se.VERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance,. On roll
call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens 11 eye", Alford "aye",
Riddiesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye". Motion
carried unanimously.
0. The Council considered adoption of an open container
ordinance for the City of Denton.
City Manager Hartung stated that tnis item was on the agenda at the
request Ot Council Member Chew.
Council Member Chew stated that he had placed the ordinance on the
agenda because he wanted to see something done in the City of Denton
to regulate open containers,
,Kr. Larry Sailey, insurance agent, stated that some people in the
City of Denton were very responsible citizens and some were not.
The ordinance wnicn was oetore the Council was the same as the one
wnicn was used by the City of Houston. Several other Texas cities
had approved open container ordinance and none had been overthrown.
City Council Mintuee
Meeting of November 1), 1983
Page Fourteen
onriiair o regulation shoulaor asked seMt* law, If he thougat open
Mr, Bailey r4pon4eo very definitely,
survey oR his tiled insurance of clai $ And80t Olf atnieoa846 to sttode to
driving while intoxicated.
The following ordinance was presentedt
d3-132
AND
0 0" tlv4 GG4S 1N MOTOR NGVEHECLESHES PROVIDING N PENALTIES ALCOHOLIC
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Berton second to adopt the ordinance and to indicate to
the state that the Council felt this should be a $tat* Statute, On
roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens aye , 61ford
"aye", Riddlespergar llay• , Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart aye",
Motion oartied unanimously,
E. The Council considered adoption Of An Ordinance
abandoning An easement, lot 9, block A, W llowwood Addition, 2030
Golf Court,
nob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the owners wanted
to $ell the property and discovered that they had built a portion of
their home in the easemeatl there were no utilities is place on the
easemedt. The abandonment would not affect any other utilities,
the Public Utility Board recommended the abandonment.
'Ins following ordinance was presentsdi
83-133
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A UTILITY
EASLtEN'r wI'rH0 'r Ks ~Ct'1'Y ' o gxroN AMY - AUTHOR121,VG' 'THE ECUTE
ALL MAYOR pT,~OD E1NTER STAUCHE~CT1YDEED
IN SAIDEEASEMENT TOIGTHE
OWNJR OF 't HE TRACT 0$F LAND CONVEYED BY SAID EASEMENri AND
UECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Hopkins motion, Barton second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote Barton "aye"r Hopkiua "aYe", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "ayeChew "aye', and Mayor Stewart "aye", Motion
carried unanimously.
F. The Council considered adoption of an annexation
ordinance and service plan for a tract of land appproximately 150,5
acres in size beginning at the intersection of 426 and Mayhill
Road, and extending easterly 250 feet either side of the centerline
t and including
af 104 acre f tract on the north a Side of m FM e yy 4263 U L-1590
Cnarlia Watkins, Senior Planner, reported twat this was the final
action on the annexation on either aide of East McKinney Street and
included property belonging to Champion Mobile Homes. Adoption of
the ordinance would require 6 affirmative votes.
The following ordinance WAS presedtedl
a3-134
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A 'TRACT Of LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
AUJACENT TO CHE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 0u,4
City Couaoil Mintues
M+er,Ia of November"151 1983
„Page F~f Can
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND 88INo SITUAT60 IN IHE COUNTY OF
D"10N, SrAT& Of TLUS AND CUN O PATAT OF CHLA5SIFYIN UST,
SAAMEA'AS AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT PROPERTYI AND DECL.ARINO
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. Oa roll (3611
vote sartoa "adyll. „ Hopk ro
i~ oya , Stephens "aye". Alford ay , 404 oittiisap6gtor l with Council ,Member Bartonycastingwtot nay vote,Mot~oa
5. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing oa the petition of
Champion Home COmmuoitles, Inc, requestint approval of a a ecific
use permit for a mobile home park On a L04.28 sage tract located
adjacent and north of FM 424 (East MoKinnoy) acid ad aoent and south
of Mills load, and beginning approximately 3,004 teat east o
Maynill Road. 5.174
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Dick Kelsey introduced Mr. John Sesbel, President of Champion
HOmea.
Homes Builders Company in favor of the petition stating that Champion
plants and 4 component plants. They were a significant part of the
gaxes housing scene a$ they bad four plants located in Texas which
produced in excess of 3,u00 homes. This made them the largest
producer of mobile homes in the state. Champion's share of the
Texas market tied increased annually and now represented
'approximately l5b of the total market. There was a need for this
type Or housing as it wall attotdable to a larger number of the
population. rho average cost of on-sita built housing had increased
dramatically. if the trend of tows price increases was
extrapolated, it would show, more significant variances by 1990. The
aver}ga novae pay"o is were such that only 10% Of rho people in the
United States could atford a new site built home, The persona who
quality o manufactured homestsin would parks~domUnU facturedmehousfing Mwas
becoming a very integral part of the housing market.
housings and statedprthatttne aIndustry pphadaemadesenormousmastridesgin
the last several years. Housing needs nod increased and would
continue to increase. Mr. Seibel than presented slides of parks
which had been developed by :nampion Homes and plans for the park
which was proposed to be built in Denton. Mr. Seibel stated that
Champion mad made major choose* to the site plan to comply with City
grantedrequTshe fProjectrwasdbegunr under eCounty
the DCity Mad ordinances.
standards but they property had not been annexed into the city.
Mayor Stewart asked about or park area on coo site plan.
Mr. Seibel snow the dark area on the site plan.
Council Member Hopkins asked about the traffic density within the
park,
Mr. Seibel satimated Cnac there would be approximately UUO cars in
the park.
Mayor Pro Tom eiddiesperger questioned the size of Cho Iota,
Mr. Seibel responded that lot sizes would Vary but would be between
4200 and 55UO square feet.
City council Mintuas
Meetin of November 15, 1983
Page Sixteen the
prop Y y ewas ppurchasedaVit o s in tn* CountyatatThe developers bad tili to cost Wnen City rhe annexation was completedQeSpecific usew Zoning
would be required. us developers had oomplied with all requests
from tae City and were only asking that they be allowed to complete
Wnst they set out to do. Tne park residents would own their own
homes and cent the lot apace sad theta Waco persons Who wanted t0
too
lief is preiafabrppoat d gnomes , Site-built houses have otaken jWasa
age nst
from renting a apartment$ for day laborers would who livDo giving an ed In 0ntonlltetAaCiVe
to re
concerned, Toe payments Would go edirectly to the manager City at far 46 e Utilities War*
be paid oy the park and recouped tnrougn rental fees.
Ali of the arguments against mobile homes had been considered by the
Planning and 'toning commission and this was found to be the highest
and best use of this land. Several opponents to the petition were
not inside the City limits and did not want to be annexed, but they
wanted the City to control the ;!evelopmeat Which was adjacent to
them. Mr. Kelsey stated that thaw was natural resistance to :oaing
changes but Cns P&Z and staff had approved and these changes would
come. You could not prevent development because you do not Want
it. Champion Homes had dealt with the City to good faith and did
not feel that they should be caught Up in a moratorium on mobile
nome parka.
many
mobile home parks Kelsey ih Know
Dentoo,
vacancieso there now war* Ridlesoar asked
Mr. Kelsey responded no did not know but they all looked full.
Mr. Spibel stated that there was a Substantial shortage of mobile
home park Space all over the United States and eSpecially dace in
Texas.
mobile Council hommember e parks owore s undasked it they er consideration were aware
in Dnton~f how ashy now 4SpOnd tnr Planning and ZoningtCommiSSiOn ebutanotrapll aofnchase proposals
would be approved.
sha shared acres
to in the~proposedtdeveglopthat mentn and owned
2776
which ~was t coBrown ntiguous Spoke.
feet of common boundary. Mr. drown also stated that he was not
opposed to the mobile home industry but felt that this particular
development was not ap ropriata for this acreage and the trend was
trbUblesame in the ease quadrant of the City. Champion had stated
that $19,000 was the worth of their homes. Since this was about the
hothat too mes and not es
mobilefelt
in average
this pack s would tvery mobile likeeallMotherBrown
cut above as they had stated. Mr. Brown then presented an
advertisement from the Denton llecord-Cnronicle for an on-site Dome
which snowed the payments to be approximately 1/2 of tou price
quoted oy Champion for tnia type of housing. There were presently
45 spaces occupied at the Lakewood Estates mobile home park which
meant that there were appproximately 160 spaces Which Waco vacant.
All of the homes at Lakewood had an exterior covering which gave the
a psarance of on-site cdnStruction homes. In the beginning stages
og the development, Champion Homes did not propose a project which
ownership were to chanwould
ge
was to happen intthet futures tond ther felt a concern for
hands,
Cityy Council Miatues
MooCiag of November 15, 1983
page Seventeen
nr, Brown then stated that if his 72 acre Arabian horse tacm was
beneficial to ttV City, he would not oppose annexation. Fir, grown
then asked those in the aucisnce who were opposed to the, petition to
stand. 00)sations to the petition iaoluded the density of the lead
use, The Denton Dew lopment outdo designated this etas as low
intensity and the Champion davelopaeat would not be a low density
use, Mr, Brown also Itsted that he antiotpotsd a drainage problem
on the property. The draintals would ooze toward MaKinne Street
with V3 of the water moving towards Mills Road. With the
additional concrete and asphalt he was Concerned about possible run
ott ptable" oa 4tlls band, Tae development would also add
additional traftia problems and congestion on Mills Road, McKinney
Street and %uyhill, A dangerous problem would also exist with turn
lanes into the part. Mt, drown 8160 stated that no believed a
pt~oblem would exist with sxtenaing City utilities to the area tad
wich the increase this development would cause in the numbers of
school children la Denton schools.
Mr, Brown Stated that, contrary to Mc. Kelsey's remarks, the
resideats in this aces were not opposed to change but wanted
change. There were currently lY existing mobile nose parks in the
eastern quadrant and 3 more which bad been approved. Mr, Brown
4istributed booklets which contained photographs of all of the
mobile home parks and mobile nose Communities in the vicinity of the
Cnampion development. Mr, drown estimated a ourrent 20Z vacancy in
the existing parks. A single family development was needed in this
area to achieve a balance of homing. Mr, drown concluded by saying
that he was pleaded at the opportunity he had been lived to know the
Couno'.l and was Concerned about the kind of mess a which would be
sent to the mobile home developers, The Councit nad made tough
decisions in the past to assure the future.
Mr. Tom Potato spoke in opposition stating that no was not a
resident of Denton and his objectioa6 were pecoonal. Mr. Peters
felt that Champion was trying to find a lace to place their mobile
homed so as to increase their market, It the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting the Chaitperaon had a prepared- statement which
led him to believe that the Chairperson bar made up his mind about
the recommendation on the zoning priot to Cho meeting. ,`ir. Peters
stated Chat the tratfic on Mayaill Ana Mills Road had not been
checxed, He felt that if the petition were Approved it should be
stipulated that Champion or the City of both should be responsible
tot the drainage or other problems,
Mr. Steve Logan spoke. in opposition stating that he ~iad been a
resident of Denton for 35 years and had recently bought a home on
Mills itoad and had never soon a mobile home park appreciate property
values.
,u Kenneth Stout spoke in opposition stating that he had lived is
the area for 25 years and had not seen Cho City in this area to
re air street. This would add to the problems wnich exiated and he
felt that nothing would be done to correct them.
or. Daniel dailey spoke in opposition Stating that low cost nousing
would impact the medical Community. Persona who were attracted to
this t pe of low cost housing could not always atfora to pay their
medical bills would would put an additional load on the taxpayers,
Mr. Kelsey spoxa in rebuttal stating the tadnnical aspects of the
petition, suan as traffic and drainage, had been studied by
engineers. Che dareloppmeat would oe well within the density called
tot in the Denton Dave lopment Guide. On the issue of City services,
Cnampion ticmes did not petition to be annexed and would hold to the
City to the plan of services which accompanied the annexation,
~ i
Cityy Council eiintuea
Maetin of Novemoer 15, 1983
page Er,hteen
Mr. Kelsey also stated that Mr, Peters and ,Kr, Logan mad puroha6e4
homes near existing mobile home Parke Of lower quality than tats
proposed development, The Council would need to look at the highest
and beat use of Cue land.
The Mayor 0104041 the public nearing,
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that most of Mr.
Kelsey's remarks were ttue; however, the Staff mac apprised Champion
domes that a specific use permit would oe required. Ellison also
states that this petition had been a mesa and was indicative of
Proo14ms with developments to the extra-tatritotial jurisdiction.
Tne Champion roJaot would nave the beat Street slatem of any mooils
home park in ~ne City. The drainage problems woU d be the same With
a single family developwent, If the pV0j00t was completed, there
would be an over-capacity situation on East McKinney, This was a
9cat* highway and could be widened to 4 lands. if too area
developed at all ptOblomg would exist '.rite traffic and drainage.
Fences, distance between homes, err. would have to meet minimum
standards. Ellison reported that the action of the Council on this
M ition would be A message to future mobile home developers, the
nhing and Zoning Commission had recommended approval by a vote of
4 to 2 with 3 conditions,
Mayor Pro Tam Riddlespergec sated if the plans for the development
met the standards in the proposed mobile home ordinance.
Ellison replied that they met and exceeded the requirements in some
instanc0s. Champion had been requested to comform to the ordinance
which wag in atfact at the time ut their construction.
Mayor Pro Tam Riddlasperger then asked if the development would set e
the standards in the new ordinance,
Ellison replied it would meet the standard of the old and new
ordinance.
Council Member Stephens asked how the development could meet the
requirements wnen the now ordinance was in draft form and that
Champion might not most the requirements of the final ordinance.
Chew motion, Riddlespetger to table the petition for a specific use
permit untiL the now mobile none ordinance was approved, Motion
carried 6 to L with mayor Stewart casting the nay vote,
6. rho Council considered approval or the request of dr. Paul
Berry to begin disannexation proceedings on approximately 4,39 acres
or land located along the east aide of Highway 377 Just nortn of
Brush Greer Road,
Hopkins motion, Stephens second to remove this item from the table.
notion carried unanimously.
Charlie Watkins, Seniur Planner, reported that this itam was ueiore
fromCthecCityi 49JheuWays notrreceivingnanyr~ityssecvitCesbang'MOUR8
was used agriculturally.
fne following ordinance visa presented;
83-
Art ORDINANCE SE'rrING A DATE, 1IME AM) PLACE FOR PUnL1G
HEARINGS CONCERNING A PROPOSED DI5ANNEXAT10N OF PROX
IMA
LAaD O.
HIGH AYE377 4NORTH OFE BRUSH CR EKL ROAD~D ON THE EASY SIDE
Hopkins motion, Barton second to deny 'd19annexation, Motion carried
unanimously.
City Council Mintuss
Meeting of November L5, L981
Page Nineteen
7, Rasolutions
The Council considered approval of a resolution in support
of a grant application to the Texas Parks and ;,Wildlife Department,
Assistant City Manager McKean stated that a trust fund had been
established for McKenna Park. This resolution would be included in
a grant application to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to
secure matching funds.
r n* tollowinK resolution was prasenr.eat
E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON DESIGNATING
Cr,RTA,r CITY OFFFICIALS AS BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR, ACTING FOR, AND ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DEN'ION IN OEALINO WITH 'ra rsus PARKS AND
WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT sOK Ind PURPOSE OF PARrICIPATI'NG IN THE LAND AND
WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT OF 19651 CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF
DENTON 1S ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE; UNDER SUCH PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the United States Congreas has passed the Land and
water Conservatiuon Fund Act of 190 (PubLic Law 8a-514),
authorizing the Secretary of the interior to provide fintooial
assistance to states, and political subdivisions thereot, tot
outdoor recreation purposed and
WHEREAS, the Texas Legislature has adopted Article 6081x,
V.A.C.S., for the purpose of allowing the State of Texas, and its
political subdivisions, to participate in the Federal program
established under said Public Law tl8-578, or such other programs as
are hereinafter estanlishea by the Federal Governmentl and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is fully eligible to receive
assistance under this Programs and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is desirous
of authorizing its administrative staff to represent-and act for the
city in dealing with texas Parka ano Wildiite Department concerning
tois Programl
BE It' RESOLVED BY IH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENra,
TEXAS;
Section 11 rhat the City Council of cne City of Denton
hereby certities that the City of Denton is eligible to receive
assistance under Public 86-5781 as augmented by Article 6081r,
V.A.C.S.
Section 21 That the City Council hereby authorizes and
diratcs its City Manager to represent and act for toe City of Denton
in dealing with the Texas Parks and Witalite Department for the
purpose of this Progtam, The City Manager is hereby officially
designated as the City's representative In this regard.
Section 31 Tae City Council hereby designated its Director
of Finance as the official autnorizea to serve as the City's fiscal
officer to receive Federal funds for purposes of this Program.
Section 41 me City Council hereby specitically autnorizea
the Gity otriciala herein designated to make application to the
Texas Parka and Wildlife Department concerning the tract of land
'nown as McKenna Park in the City of Denton,
City council Mintues
8,1et.ing of November 151 1983
Page Twenty
INrd00ucto, MEAD ANA PASSED by the attirmation vote of the
City Council of the City of Denton, on this 15th day of November,
1983.
CITY Of DENTON, TEAS
ATTESTi
CHARLOTTE Ak;I1Y SECRZTAAY
DENION, TKXAS
APPROVtu AS TO FORMi
C. J. VAYLUA, UITY w
eeidd.lteperger motion, Chew second that the resolution De passed. On
Coll Call vot• bartnn "aye " Napkins ly~" Stfpnfna "aye", Alford
,
"aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "ay*':1 , a ,nd Mayor Stewart aye„ .
Motion carried unanimously.
S. The Council held a discussion on an amendment to the
General Talephone franchise ordinance,
Assistant, City Manager Ricx Svenla reported that General Telephone
had requested the station of the franchise ordinance codcerhing the
liability of the pnone company to pay for any rate Studies by
deleted. Currently all rate increase requests were studied by the
andertheasCity discussion' in had the added lathis
Public abUtility anaohi g the Cowisaion.
SOCCion to COVfr the Coat Of future rats, studies,
Mayor Stewart asked Ms. Joann Dean of GTE was the advantage would be
to the Witty.
Ma. Dean stated that GTE has asked for the section to of deleted
because the PUG and the Staff conducted the study, 99 did the rekas
,iunicippal League. This study was provided to the City and there
would be no need for an additional study.
Council Member Hopkins asked what would happen it the PUG was
dissolved.
Ma. Dean rapitea there woula be codas out she did not believe this
would happen.
Council Member Stepnens asked wasn't GTE reouired to pay a portion
of the rate study.
that the franchise this.
ordinanct ,lso
recommendedeihpt T&YlOt Stated
that at acme future date the legislation eliminated the provision
that the phone company pay for rate Studies, we would t,ave that
issue addressed.
Ms. Dean asked that the ordinance be worded such that it the PUG was
aboiisned and there were no funds the G phone company would work
with the ,ity of the charges '+hich w0 u oe incurred for a rata
Study. v.
Council Member Barton stated no believed the ordinance Should be
left as it was,
Council Member Hopxine stated that the Council did not know the
efteCt Of this and they should know.
city Council Mintues
Meeting of November 1$, 1903
Page Twenty-One
Hopkins motion, Barton Second to table for tUCtner StUdy. Motion
passed unanimously.
rhe Counoil considered approval of an agreement with the
Town of Lfttla Elm for the holding of animals at the City of Denton
Animal control %;eacer.
senior Administrative Assistant Bill Angelo reported this agreement
would allow for the reimbursement to Denton of costs associated with
the nolding of animals from Little Elm.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to approve the agreement. Motion
cacrisd unanimously.
lu. Item 1U, to consider approval or extending water and sewer
services outside the City limits to R, 0. McDonald, was withdrawn
trom the agenda at -.no request of Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities.
11. The Council considered approval of an extension for the
option agreement with P&S Contractors, Inc., for the diesel plant
sale,
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that P&S Contractors,
Inc. were the brokers would were working with Proctor and Gamble for
the $ale of the diesel plant. P66 would pay an additional $10U,000
to extend the option agreement to the end Of the Year.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to approve the extension. Motion
carried unanimously,
12. Item 12, to consider approval of participation in an
oversize waterline (12") for Champion Mobile Home Park (East
AcKinney Street near Meynili Road), was withdrawn from the agenda at
the request of Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities.
13, In* Council Considered approval Of participation in an
oversize waterline (2011) to service Denton County Electric
Cooperative, Inc, on Loop 'e88 and associated pro rata agreement.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the Public Utility
Board recommended approval of tnis participation, the cost to the
City would be $70,00U,
Mayor Stewart asked it the water line nod been changed to 24".
Nelson responded yes,
Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the participation. Motion
carried unanimously.
14. The Council held a discussion On the impact of growth On
Denton's wastewater Treatment Plant capacity.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that 7 to 7 1/c million
gallons of wastewater were being produced at the wastewater
treatment plaoc. The plant could service a population of up to
90,000 which the City of Denton should coach in the late 199019.
Mayor Stewart tnen asked it the plant capacity would be adequate
until the late 1990'x.
Nelson responded yes, unless mayor industries moved to Denton.
Mayor Stewart asked wnst effbct the service to the extra-territorial
jurisdiction had on the capacity.
Nelson replied it reduced cbe capacity available for tea City by the
number of persons in the extra-territorial yurisdiction that tied on.
City COUnoil Mintues
Meeting of November 15, 1983
Page Twenty-Two
Council Member Hopkins stated that the City would reach a time when
it could not afford to build a new plant. Hopkins asked how would
the City deal with people in the extra - territorial jurisdiction
which have to be served.
Nelson responded the City might have to go to an impact fee which
was charged at the time the customer in the extra-territorial
jurisdiction tied on to the system.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the rate payers were paying a
significant amount for water and sewerage and it was becoming
increasingly more difficult to cope with new people who were being
Annexed or served by the City.
The Council considered authorizing the City Manager to
enter into an agreement with Arthur Andersen to develop a fixed
asset inventory system.
City Manager Hartung reported that there had been a conc.trn by
previous auditors and the present auditors about the lack of a fixed
asset inventory for the City. Authorizing the agreement would begfn
Phase I of this major project. The cost for Phase I would be $6,000.
Chow motion, Barton second to approve the agreement. Motion carried
unanimously.
L6. Official Action on Executive Session Itemai
A. Legal Matters
Barton motion Chew second not to renew the airport management
contract with YAMS. Motion carried unanimously.
17. No items of New Business were requested by the Council
Members.
18. The Council moved to the emergency agenda to consider
approval of a resolution granting approval for the Denton County
Housing Finance Corporation to provide financial assistance with
respect to purchasing, improving, and constructing homes located
within the corporate limits of the City of Denton.
The following resolution was presented;
R E S O L U T I O N
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
RELATING TO THE DENTON COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION; APPROVING
THE EXERCISE OF THE POWERS OF THAT CORPORATION WIT1lIN THE CORPORATE
LIMITS OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Denton County Housing finance Corporation, a
non-profit corporation created under and pursuant to the Texas
Housing Finance Corporations Act," has been organized with the
approval and consent of Denton County, Texas, to provide a means of
financing the costs of residential ownership and development that
will provide decent, safe and sanitary housing for the residents of
Denton, County, Texas, at affordable prices; and
WHEREAS, the said Corporation plans to provide financial
assistance with respect to the purchase, improvement and
construction of homes located within the City of Denton Texas, if
approval thereof required by the aforesaid Act is given 6y the City
Council; and
i
City Caunoil Mintues
Meeting of November 15, 1983
Page Twenty-Three
WHEREAS the City Council hereby finds and determines that
it would be in the beat interesb of the City and its inhabitants for
said Corporation to provide financial assistance with respect to
homes located within the corporate limits of the City; now,
therefore,
Be IT RESOLVED SY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS
SECTION 1.
That approval. is hereby given and granted to the Denton
County Housing Finance Corporation to provf.de financial assistance
with respect to purchasing, improving, and constructing homes
located within the corporation limits of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
Nothing her-1.r .11 be construed to be a waiver of any
building code requirc4e11 r standards prescribed for homes located
within the City in c: vt, tan with the approval herein granted to
said Corporation,
SECTION III.
This resolution shall be effective from and after its
passage, and it is to resolved.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 15th day of November, 1983.
RICMW 0. S , RYO
ATTEST: I
(my MKMARY
CHARLOTTE ALLEN,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Stephens motion, Chew second that the resolution be Passed. On roll
call vote Parton "a,ye" Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddlespergar aye , G~hew "aye", and Mayor Stewart eye Motion
carried unanimously.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
1165C
Oily COUNClI. M1NUi4s
Novemoor 1943
ins Counoll convened into an 6xavutivs Sesalon at 5130 p,m, in the
City Manager's Conference Room to discuss legal matters, real
estate, personnel and Doard appointments. No otticial aetioh was
taken,
PRESENTi Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro ism Kiddlesperger, Council
Membela ALtord, Barton, Chew, and Stephens
ADSOTi Council Member Hopkins was absent due to a family
emergency
No Council then convened into the special called meeting at I:UO
p.m. in the Council Chambers,
PRt.5EN11 Mayor Stewart, Mayor Pro lem Riddlesperger, Council
members Altord, darton, Chew, and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
AbSBNY; Council Member Opkins was aDsent due to a family
emergency
1, roe Council donefoerea approval of an ordinance instituting
annexation proceedings on a tract of land consisting of
approximatel// u14,4 acres located soutn of Highway 46U and west of
I-35, a-1bLU
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that this was the ttrst
reading of the annexation ordinance. The puDlic hearings naa
aLroaay been neld,
Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the itrat reading of the
oralnance. Motion carried 5 to 1 with Council Kember Barton casting
the n-y vote.
G, The Council considered approval of an ordinance instituting
annexation proceedings on a 43.4 acre tract of land located west of
i-35w service road and south of the existing City limit line, L-lbll
Chew motion, Stephens second to approve the tract -reading of the
ordinance, Motion carried unanimously,
3, rho Council considered approval of an ordinance instituting
annexation proceedings on approximately 367 acres of Lana located
between I-35w and the Santa Fe railroad, L-lbll
Charlie Watkins, senior Planner, reported that the Council had
requested a discussion on adjustments in the annexation boundaries.
Alternate boundaries woula be urougnt to the l.ounCll on iledember o,
1983.
Barton motion, Chew second to approve the first reading of the
ordinance, ,lotion carried unanimously,
4, roe Council considered approval of an ordinance instituting
annexation proceedings on approximately 1115 acres of land located
on botn sides of Mayhill NoaU oortn of 1-35, e-ib13
Mayor Pro 'rem Kiaelespergev asked it the Staft was working on plans
for areas to be deleted rrom this annexation,
Charlie Watkins, Senior PLenner, responded yes.
Council olemDer altars asked it tnls would also oe preaentea to the
Council on December o,
Watkins replied yes.
City Council +Kinutas
dotting ut NOVember 'LL, 1y10
Page No
Cnew motion, Kiddlesperget seuond to approve the tirst reaping of
the ordinance, Motion cartleo h to i with Council 6ember Barton
casing the nay vote,
ins Council than radOnVenOU into the l.xeduttve Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. No
ofticial action was taken.
11720
,
CITY of affNTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (81'7) W-8200
M E M O RAN D U M
T0; G, Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROMI (tick 5vehla, Assistant City Manager
DAI.E: January 10, 1984
SUBJEC'r: Ridgeway Drive bids
bids were taken almost two months ago on the Ridgeway Drive
project. Assessment hearings and the Certificates of
Obligation advertisement and sale have been completed for the
project. Since all the legal requirements are now complete, it
is appropriate to award the bid on Ridgeway Drive.
There were several bidders on t,ie project and the low bidder
for the improvements was Jagoe Public Company, The staff
recommends the low bidder.
If you or the Council have any further questions, we will be
happy to try and answer them.
i
Ric ve a
Assistant City L'Aanager
jd
158OM
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: Januaty 17, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM p Consent agenda
SUBJECT; Bid 11 9209 Ridgeway Drive paving & Drainage
SU',*MY: This bid is for the construction Paving and Draiange of
Ridgeway Drive. We sent this bid to our vendors re-
sponding to recent bids plus others requesting to be
included on this bid list. We received four replies as
shown on the tabulation sheet, together with their re-
spective 5% bid bonds.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council.
ALTERNATIVES: Delay awarding. Reject bids and/or rebid.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder meeting
specification and bid requirements of Jagoe Public for
the total contract price of $427,230.26.
EXHIBITS: Tabulation sheet.
SUBMITTED BY: lL~~l-y
n J ,arshall, C.P.M.
Punch sing Agent
9tp 1_ 20
Btp TITLE_ _Ridg_away 1)tiv_e Pnving &
Drainage ,Jagoe onI've rt AFAC Marriott
OPENEO __i1122~a1 public Co, I'aving Co, Bros,, „ Inc
ACCOUNT A 42LQW 0010-9105
ALT?' _ -~LOE5CRIPTION VENU03t V> Nlx)wA, VENIwIt _ VNUOk VENDOR VENDOR VENI)OR
1'atnl bid price 4270230,26 5421166,80 451,197,07 4430217,41 -
100 working days
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-Up SUKWY $HEET
DATE OF MEETING; January 17, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent Agenda
SUBJECT; Bid 0 9219 Ambulance
SUN*WI Yi This bid is for the purchase of a replacement of an
ambulance in our fleet, We sent out bids to several
prospective bidders and received four bids on the
ambulance with trade-in and two outright purchase bids
for our old unit, We consider this a good response and
excellent prices,
ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by council and award of bid,
SOURCE OF FUNDSi Lease/purchase,
RECO%LNENDATIONs We recommend this bid for one ambulance with trade-in
be awarded to the lowest and best bidder of Superior
Southwest, Inc, for $38,948.00 less $7,000.00 trade-in
and two outright purchase bids for our old unit, We
consider this a good response and excellent prices,
EXHIBITS; Tabulation sheet and memo from Jack Gentry.
SUBMITTED BYI
John J. Marshall, C.P. .
Purchasing Agent
BID N 9219
010 TM E Ambalnnoe
South Point Superior Summers Stnr.line Superior .Iustln vtvr!
11p,Nfn_ 1/5/8!___ Chry-Uocigo Remount,lnc Ambulanco YnCUrprlse Southurest. Dept,
ACCOUNT N 100-006-0051-9104 And Conch Inc.
-F 4TY,. V9NI)OK_.-_ _ V NI)Uk vyllDUtt--, -VI:NUOR _ .-VEMDOR vl_Nl)Y
1 l Ambulance 39,562.37 42,849.00 39,191.00 38,948,00
Lese 51000.00^ 71000.00 2,500.00 7,000,00--
2. 1 TotnI. with trade-titi 34,562.37 35,849,00 36,691.00 31,948.00 -J---
2A l 0utrtght purchnse 3,501.00 5,201.00
- D011Vecry 60 days 45-60dAys _ 60_90 days 45-90 days
t4V IC RANDUM
DATE; January 11, 1984
I
John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
FRO 11: Jack Gentry, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Bid No. 9219
I
After reviewing all bids for new ambulance, we are recom-
mending low bid meeting all specifications,
The )ow ~Idd.er was Sunerior Southwest, 3910 East Overton Rd.
Dallas; 'fK;X,80 75216,
Bid $33,948
Less Trade-in 7000()
$31,948
ac < ,en'tr.v
Fire Chief
JG/ ec
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ,
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MFETINC: January 17, 1984
COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM p Consent agando
SUBJECT: Did 0 9220 Switches
SDL*IARY: This bid is for the purchase of replacement vacuum
switct:es used in the electrical distribution system
feeding the Golden Traingle ?fall, Currently we do
not Jtiave satisfactory back-up switch gear for this
installation,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by e..ouncil and award of bid.
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1983-84 Budget account 610-008-0252-9221-E367, Capital
Improvements, Electrical Distribution System.
RECDDIENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to R,D, Erb Company
George M, Fullwood, The Trayer switch is what we
are currently using and the RTE switch offered by
Priester would necessitate extensive modifications
making it uneconomical to purchase,
Tabulation sh~et,
E?;HIBITS :
SUBMITTED BY: Tom D, Shaw, C.P.N.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
BID 9220
HI.U TITLF.
Prieslor George rs
lli't,N~.1) 1/5/84
Go Supl,ly vull.wood
ACCOUNT / 610-008;0252-92211-r36~~
VLF NW12
Y- oqp, VC UUR V_ tJ1)OR T, Y ~ _ _ V Nl it .._VPNI)UR
1. _ 1ri,yet Switch ((7929 69596.00 6,775.00 - 61596,00 -~i
2. 1 Trnyer Switch #7928 10,555.00 80000,00 100,555.00
8-10 Wks. 13-15 wkH
F08 Denton Denton -Denton
CITY COWCIL AGENDA;
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHUT
DATE OF MEETINGi January 17, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM !1 Consent agenda
SUBJEC 1 nid # 9221 Transformer Bases
SU"iVARYI This bid is for the purchase of streetlight trans-
former bases used to house the streetlight trans-
former., soiring ,junctions, etc. This item also pro-
vides the anchor base for streetlighting poles. This
particular base is used for the larger poles and light
along interstate 35 and other highway lighting.
ACTION REQUIREM Approval.by council and award of bid.
SOURCE OF FUNDSi This material is Warehouse stock and funded in Working
Capl.tal account 710-004-0598-8708.
RECOKPIENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest b±dder
meeting specifications of Civeo Products at $237,50
each for item 1 and $57.75 each set for item 2. Total,
bid $7,086.00, delivery in 15 days, FOB Denton, V110
pr.ox Net 30.
The bid offered by Barr-Bennison Company is for a smaller
pole simular to that used in residential and parking
area lighting.
EXHIBIT! Tabulation sheet.
SUBMITTED BY
T D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
I
DID N 9221
011)
TI.TI,F. _CVnneformer Enaaa
i)pFNNf' 1/5/84 Clvca 1'riestor Temp lo, Grclybar Hsrr-
prodtlcts Supply F1ectria Hennison
m(;Uf1N'P N
VE mlt VRNDUtt - - -
VY,NUUR WNf)OR VENOOR ~VENDOR
1, 24 Nnse,_fitreatlight 237,50 315,00~~ -.-.__T^~
_33000- 31050 172,00 - - ----__._---24
.51nLs Anchor bolt----. 57 75/st - 75,OG/st 83,00 47,15/at 6700/st
Delivery --4--y 15 days - 60-75 ditys 60-75 60 56 days
_
FOB Denton - Denton - T Denton Denton Denton
Terms - W 2Y. 10N30 Net 30 - Net 30 Net Net
-
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ,
SACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETINGI January 17, 1934
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent Agenda
5UBJEM Bid 0 9221 Concrete Slab
SUMARYf This bid is for the construction of a concrete storage
slab approximately 12 feet wide and 290 feet long and
6 inches thick. This is for the storage of transformers
and other supplies at the Service Center at 901 Texas
Street. The specifications are such to hold the weight
and with required reinforcing steel and proper drainage,
We received five bids ranging from $6,080,00 to ;8,889.60
as shown on the tabulation sheet.
ACTION REQUIRED Approval by council and award of bid,
SOURCE OF FUNDS; Electric Bond Fund account 610-008-0252-9228-L361.
RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder of
J.d. Gray Construction Company for the amount of $95.00
per cubic yard for the estimated total of $6,080.00.
EXNIB M Tabulation sheet,
SUBMITTED BY
John J, hla /81Sa11, C.P,M.
Purchasing Agent
BID 0 9223 91D TITLE Concrete Slab
OPMNEI)--l/5/84 ornco Calvort J.14, Cray Fort Floyd
_ I'nving C011st. Dall toll 51111"11
ACCOUNT A
t
FLUiSR VENDOR` VENDOR VENDOR.- _ ti'BM)OR
132.98 103.31 95.00 138,90 113,40
rlce I'er Yard
I. Concrete Slab 8510,72 6611.84 6080,00 8889.60 7257.60
- - -Days to complete ARO 14 days 21 days 5 dava 4 days 7 days
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-Up SUMMARY SHExT
DATE OF INEETINGi January 17, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM I/ Consent Agenda
SUBJEM Bid 11 9224 Roll-Off Refuse Truck
SMIA RY; This bid is for the purchase of a new truck cab/chassis
and roll-off frame for the commercial solid waste depart-
ment. This unit will be an addition to the fleet and the
older unit will serve as a back-up vehicle.
ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by council and award of bid.
SOURCE OF FUNDS; This vehicle will be funded through et toatie/purchase
agreement. The lease/purchase funding package will be
presented to council at a later date after other pieces
of equipment are bid and approved.
RECOMENDATIONi We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated
bidder for each item.
Item 111: Truck cab/chassis - We recommend this item be
awarded to Mack Truck of Fort Worth in the amount of
$59,938.00 FOB Denton. The original bid delivery schedule
was 150 to 180 days however, this delivery has now been
improved to 14 days. A truck meeting the intent of our
specification has been located in stock at a California
Mack Dealership and can be shipped immediately after
receipt of order.
Item 112; Roll-Off Frame; - We recommend this bid be
awarded to lack Truck of Fort Worth in the amount of
$13,408.00 installed and delivered to the city of Denton.
This item was also bid by G & H Manufacturing at the
same price to City of Denton, Mack Truck, Lone Star
Peterbilt and other vendors. We prefer to buy the unit
through Mack Truck as a complete truck and frame.
Total cost of this bid is $73,346.00 FOB Denton with de-
livery in 14 days.
i
The bid of Gateway Ford does not meet specification and
it is a 1982 model truck. Mahaney International has bid
a conventional cab/chassis, not a cab-over as specified
and also has a 90 day estimated delivery.
The bids submitted by I.D.S. for the roll-off frame do
not meet specification. The frame rail is only 8" and
we specified 9". The lift and reeving cylinders are
below our specifications and several other exceptions
have been taken to our specifications.
G
Page 2
Council agenda back-up summary sheet
Bid # 9224
EXN'IBITY Tbulatio s aet,
SUBMITTED BY
Tom D, Shaw, C,Phi,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
- -
r~u► 1 9728
hill hall-Off Rt+fuee Tritok
RSSI hnlrron/ Hnek 1'ruok Bond rqulp ,ona 3tnr INS 1111 103 82 INS 13 HnhnuoY O' 6 II HeA,
Opr.N_1/.5/84 ~Y Wtawny nlorhlll Inl'1,
Ford
Ncc (HINT 1 _
-i' Y, --`I'fEN"IIPNCIFI:~1'Nt! ~r VOt31f" VNOt7A- "VFmtllf` VF1Ubfi" V~ittx3~f ' VEI~Wit` VUt7T _ F1~t1Ufl_~ .FHWII" VFfItR3~ ~rFt3t3IC
I, Truck Cab/Chnenis - 39,325,00 59,938,00 66,130,00 61,411,00 _ 59,911,110 T - Y_ Y
2. Roll-Off Frmhm 17,711,83 13,408,00 11,409.00 - 13,488,00 13,349.00 13,349.00 13,351,00 13,1108.110
3, Co"binerion truck 6 frnele _ 78,674.13 52,733,00 11,346,00 74,879,00 74,820,00 19,451,00 11,962,00
Delivery 135 doYe 24 do
S - ,ley= 90-120 days 63 drays 120 days 120 lays y 120 days 90 days
Truck Hake Int'f, Ford Hnck CrnnoPelerbllt Poterbllt Crnne Int'I, III[ 'I, _
Hode1 11-5070 1,N8000 HR611~- 44 14 310 310 4414 0070 F5070 y -
C'I'TY COUNCIL AGENDA •
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: January 17, 1984
COUNCIL AOFNDA ITEM f~ Consent agenda
SUBJECT: Bid 0 9225 Water S Sewer Supplies
SVIMARY: This bid is to purchase replacement stock for the
Warehouse. This list of copper setters (meter yokes),
manhole rings and lids as well as the water meter boxes
is estimated to last approximately 90-120 days. This
material is used in the maintenance and now construction
of the water distribution and sewer collection system.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid.
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Warehouse working capital account 710-004-0598-8709.
RECOMMENDATION: S7o recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
for all four items to Trans-Tex Supply as follows:
1. 350 pcs. Copper setters @ $17.14 $5,999.00
2. 50 pcs. Manhole lids @ $35.00 1,750.00
3. 25 pcs. Rings @ $50.00 2,500.00
4. 400 pcs. Meter boxes @ $21.50 8,600.00
$18,849.00
FOB Denton, delivery in 60 days, terms M ON30.
EXHIBIT: Tabulation ~I-e~~t.
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
BID ! 9225
819 TM E Water & Sewer SuppLtas
OPP.NVD 1/5/84 Fitting Bowles & Trans-'rex Industrial
Sipply :den Supply lnternntio al
ACCOUNT r
_ .~TY~_ D> Sl (~lJ'TtO - VBNUOE~ VLND01~ _ _ VRNUOR___ VrNDo VENVOR_~ VENDOR ~ VENDOR
1. 350 Copper setters 5/8" x 3/4" 18,25 17.14 ~ 17.80
2. 50 Lid, Manhole 49,00 51.75 35.00
3. 25 Rings, manhole 61.50 65.10 50,00
4. 400 Meter, box 34A 25.30 26,75 21.50 25,41
Delivery 30 days 60 days 60 days 5-60 days
FOB Denton Denton Denton Denton
Terms N c t Net 27ION30 Net
I
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING i January 17, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent Agenda
SUBJECT; Bid # 9230 PVC Conduit
SU?LMRY This bid is for the purchase of a sufficient quantity
4 inch and 5 inch schedule 40 PVC conduit and fittings
to encase a high voltage electrical feeder line across
the North end of the Municipal Airport runway, This
project is a portion of the new airport substation now
nearing cou"plet.ion,
ACTION REQUIRM Approval by Council and award of bid,
SOURCE OF FUNDSi 1983-84 Budget funds account number 610-008-•0252-9220-
E366, Capital imporvements to the Electrical Distribution
system, Work order number 1838.
RECOIZIMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
for all items, Graybar Electric.
1, 7260' 5" conduit @ 1,2916 $ 91377.00
2. 2060' 4" conduit @ .9375 1,931,25
3, 8 pcs, 5" x 90° Bend 0 13.10 104.80
4, 50 pcs" 5" collar @ 4.59 229,50
TOTAL Bill $11,642,55
EXHIBIT; ~ ' A~`r~~
Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
b[b 1'VC Conduit 5" _
Orayhar WFISCG ToMple, CIIml11a Corr-Teel1 Prlestor Noleen Dealers
OCfSM 1/10/04 F 0clrlc Inc, Supply Supply ptectric Electric
ACC(111H'P
-7 Y. I7TFi `BLIEIi"1'ID~ VL"Ron- MOPE -M iR31t 'VEHWR'- VENDOC"' "RDUR_._ vCffi3DfE`-..~ErWR~r'~N1~ORW v~Fl[~n_ viNflrio~I
5" I'VC 1 2916 1.30 1.32 1,129 1.2962 1.60 1.366 - 1.3086
2. 4" PVC .9315 .9475 9.50 1950 9201 -1417 11003 .9369
31 S" x 90' Bend 13.10 12.56 15.40 - 15.04 16.31 16.00 12.50 ^12.e9^_ V - -
7 5" C0114r v 4.59 4.60 5140 5.26 5104 6.00 4,50 4.57 A -
0clivery 30-6b days 14 days 15-20 days 14-21 days 20 days 7 daya-- 10 Lrp 14 days ~
,
A
CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA
S1It'fMARY SHrET
KEEPING DATE; January 17, 1984
AGENDA ITEM: Consent
SUBJECT., PO 1161209 Repair Parts For Flow Meter
SIMMR1'; This PO is for the emergency purchase of repair parts
for a model 900 transverse flow metier, Thta meter
would not work without the repair partH therefore an
emergency PO was issued and the parts l;nvo been reeei.oed
and the valve In operation.
ACTION REQUIRED, Approval of Purchase Order by Counct:t,
SOURCE OF FUNDS; 1983-84 Budget
RECOXkMFN1) ATION; We recommend this Purchase Order 1161209 to Mapeo Inc.
for emergency meter repair he approved for payment, im
the amount of $3590.00.
EXHIBITS: Purchaso Order
Order Acknowledgement
5UB,1T'I"1'14U BY: /.f r./ r.`i
f l_ ._L ~ ~f_.._~._
,Tohn ,T; Marshall, C.P.M.
/Purclinsing Agent
ORDER ACKNOWLEOGEMENT
0 his Is Nol all lnvob.ro)
~r
C
tJ II y _ Y(oloolNo..._ _ 5900
1 ~I 15~A A(C KJ't~c. f800SEinRimorotwnnun~TUlun,p'+Inhomat4111~Phr,nn:(Ot814'>9•t01p~7ot6xA0%59:
gIdn
SOLE) To: City of Denton CUSInfnvrOfdor140.
Pkirchnsi111,, 00pt,
21S li, McKinney 61200
Denton, TX 76201
Esllmalud Shippln,7 Oat(!
Docomber 30, 1983
Y!I r0:
SAME
N'astowator Trentmont sh;,,1',7!.r:;nrrc
1100 Mayhill Road
Denton, TX 76205 LIPS
P/N (100,147 with Modules 2 $1'195.00 X3590.00
5\!E1' TOTAL ORDER AMOUNT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -fi3590.00
Rof: Project 3633
`j
Ail
ff:Rh1S;,*IE73(I:?Al'i:•-•Sulrj,•cllnCrudilap~roval J' ~ .
7!,Is o0rr i!, S~I i: Ir. Ihr• Ifltln:~%nrl Corlditi-m.3 cUr11•u;Vrrt
h f irl lllii ' G `I i; (!n IItC fr!VEfS!' UIr}(; pld IIU r~III']F S.
f) 0" D 3
CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT, PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER 61209
216 6, MOKlnneY
Denton, Texds 76201
817/666-3311 'D/FW Nletr) 287.0042 WE 12-5-Fl3 110 NO.
VtNDOR NO. TEOMS W.O. NO.
DIIIVAAY AfC. NO.
SHIP 62R0-008-VY/ 0-8L339
Mapco Inc.
Process Controls Div. To: CITY Of DENTON
11391 East Tecumseh Wastewater Treatment
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74116 1100 Mayhill Rd.
_-_-11ttq; Sales Dept, Donlon, Texas 76205
6H0%V P.O. NOON ALL SHIPMENTS, DELIVERY TICKETS, INVOICES ETC., SEND INVOICIIS TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS
I5 VXEMPT MW SALES TAX AS PER HOUSE GILL 9%20. THE CITY OF DENTON ISPROHIBITED FROM PAYING r~OR MERCHANDISE BEFORE IT IS
ImCEIVEO. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE F,O.B., CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS.
ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER - y UESCRI PT ION QUAN,/UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Part for Model 900 Transverse Flow Meter Mapco Project #3683
Part needed:
PN400447-002-Printed-circuit Board assy, vi/modules 2 3590,00
Direct Ail Inquiries To: A
CITY OP DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT.
John J. Marshall, C.P.M., Purchasing Argent
Tom D. Show, C.P.M., Asst. Purchasing Agent
411Y CUUNG1L AGENDA
nAGK-U,N SUMMARY SHEE 1
ME611NU UA1'L: January 17, 1984
SUBJEU. Approval of the preliminary plat oL Lots A and B
of the Uenton Square Addition
SUMMARY: '.'his tract is located at the northeast corner of
the 1-35E service road and Teasley Lane. The
property is zoned commercial (C) and a retail
shopping center development is anticipated, `the
purpose or the plat is to comply with the subdi-
vision regulations which require that a plat be
on iile before a building permit can be issued.
water and sewer line extensions and drainage
improvements will be requireo to serve this
property. 'these improvements will be addressed
during the tinal platting stage. Other public
facilities are available for this project,
AGi1UN R8llUIKEU: Approval of the preliminary plat.
RECUMMENDA I LON: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat with the con-
dition that the number at driveways and the
driveway locations are not being approved as
shown on the preliminary plat,
ALTERNA~IVE5: Approval of the preliminary plat witn or without
conditions.
ACFAGHMEN'P: Reduced preliminary plat,
: r 11
David Ellison
Development Review Planner
1I
`I
I i
1 t 'l1Y FY'IU'M'lll \IIfNN1i NMIYf 11{
I INNN'II IYI
I L Ir NYf L+~ I IuMYM IMM Y.MIr r«+'Yr~l //MNYI f'll I " v
I _ • _ _ L1 1
.4 r
1'111 N. l ~ ti s l1 1lI
. i , I I I 1, I ~ LY ~_1'rw/IiYn 4..r I, 1~
I l I NUNM
11111•.«. N u 'L'am
II W.411,004 IMA f ..._M~r11 r1'w lMrr l lrr Mi
toMi
I r ..«.Ir
1W N I I Co.
ryy
(r+ •`~"j.rCd_ ,`1 :YJf" ' / I / Y~111 r ~ '1 urlrlhMf LfsGHrWM Mt/' '
I 4r ~ I MI 1 1 ~pT/ ^ I I, ' I 11 . f ~ ~ I 00
44 PU11114
I ! /r I 11 1CONMlIICIAI~~tl M~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~f`«'"" I ~ i i t uwlwr Irl I
r'- ~I I lOf I f Ci
~ 1 • ~ r~ I I I I 'I l ~ a1yoW ~ i I I
. r.11rY h.
~A4 / ~ ~I- - 1 I ~ ~~l
"lok
•.1 4' I I
w. I I II
~pD I o tl.„
4.~~`\ M. i 1\ 1 t 'tf1.''L i~ C 1 ~ •It pi,«I ~1 T'¢Y1~CV
Iry '1~1 1 1 '1 IIy~F...
1e.._ ~ T6.M f11 pY L L♦
M IOM\l 1~1'~LII IIIL ~I 1 [ LII
1001 4oPlPwe1 ICY NI RA YN
Pool OF PFUNIV
c.,.lroil yyu ~'I
UNTLCfi f_-.
1 11,.49U9..IAT~ *,h
tlTaw M«
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SiIEF+T
MEETING DATE: January I7, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of part of Lots I
and 2, Ist Installment of the Carroll Park
Addition
SUMMARY; This ,2470 acre tract is located at the north-
west corner of Congress Street and Carroll
Boulevard, The intent of the replat is to
remove an existing lot line between lots l and 2
for re-subdivision Into one lot. The property
is zoned planned development (PD) for office use
and office development is anticipated.
Adequate streets, utilities, drainage and other
public facilities are available to the site.
ACTION Rl?QOIRBD, Approval of the final replat.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the final replat.
ALTERNATIVE; Approval of the final replat,
ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat.
~C
navITTson
Development Review Planner
0014s
sa
N k 4
QA0.Y P. PATTON Fk JAN A YATE S, RA
u
y
I
y >
c ~
Or ! A ,
Y
47CACRE -
J
ILI:
.f
al
41
i ~ c9
60 0' y Y
1 tki
I (
I{ °
i
L.
I ~
1
r
N
.1
~ II
NIS
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA
BACK-11P SUMMARY SHEET
ME1'TING DATE: January 17, 1984
SUBJEc T: Approval of the final replat of part of Lot 9,
Block 4, of the College Addition
SUMMARY; Part of hot 9, Block 4, of the College Addition
is located on the north side of West Prairie
Street approximately 404,5 feet east of Welch
Street, The property is zoned multi-family
0IF-1) and the anticipated land use is
multi-family. The original College Addition was
primarily pplatted into lots with 100 feet of
frontage, however, many lots have been split and
sold by metes and bounds description without
officially replatting, Most conveyances
occurred several years ago but current
regulations require an official replat or lot of
record map before a building permit may be
issued,
Adequate sewer, electrical, drainage, telephone,
gas, cable T,V „ and street facilities are in
place. An existing two (2) inch water line will
not provide the proposed multi-family
development with adequate service; therefore,
the developers must upgrade the facilities to a
six (G) incl. line in conjunction with final
platting and development, Plans for the water
line improvements are acceptable,
ACTION RFQUIRFD: Approval of the final replat,
RFCOMDIENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the final replat,
A'TTAC1 MCNTt Reduced final rep,lat.
Dav E son
Development Review Planner
00145
sa
+ ~ i 1f fY~i~ f„,t ~I ~t 3 1't
+I,l
O'ATI N MAP
i
I
I
COLL OE IADOt iON
i F. ~ r I t + ~ r+ufr
irrf,'rVt~l
r► I I i i ' 6 l f I F
'aoa,s~ ra a
n 'NC51
WEST PRAIRIE ao a..•~.I STREET
PL dC£ :f
J +tGINNiNO• • _ -
LJ 08
R P.I AS MARX QF 019...
AD O.M.0
4~rr~ LOVIN4 SU,FZVEY _ 9 ,XRYA ..._~!4
~~J,Lt~N , ~9UN7Y. r ~ K,A.~
ONERO
RgF.FINQ - WA B(~~ mQnRT!UM
aQS ni2h~ . Ro_1D Q4~~K1k~ if r. LEx_.._.Tp-M
BROWN LAND WRYEYOU
aogx~n_,~y,, reY ~ Lsoe ~
J
+
CITY OF 0 NTON
MEMORANDUM
101 Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: C. Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATE: January 12, 19B4
SUBJECT., Agenda Item #3
1 will be meeting with a representative from Arthur Andersen at
5100 p.m, on Thursaay, January 12 to receive a briefing and to
discuss the secona phase at the fixed asset inventory project.
Back-up materials for this agenda item will be forwarded to the
council as quickly as possible,
i
G. Chris artung
ca
11I1C
4
Cl'TYof vzwCN, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ! DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
T0; The Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM; Bill Angelo, Senior. Administrative Assistant
DATE; January 11, 1984
SuBipt. r Amendments to the Animal. Control Ordinance
I have attached for your consideration copies of a proposed
ordinance amending Chapter Your of the Code of Ordinance.
This ordinance accomplishes two objectives which have been
previously discussed with the council, First, this ordinance
teeth into Section 4-7 of the Animal
attempts to put more
Control ordinance by redefining stray animal violations.
Secondly, this ordinance establishes a mandatory registration
program for dogs and cats. The need for both of these amend-
ments will be discussed in the following sections of this memo.
STRAY ANIMAL, VIOLATIONS
As you know, the current definition of stray animals has
created some effectiveness problems for our Animal Control
Officers in the enforcement of this provision. As currently
stated, an animal must be "unrestra:..ned and wander onto public
property or on to the property of another." before a violation
is committed. In order to enforce this provision, our, officers
must actually observe the animal off of the animal owner's
property. In most situations, our officers will receive a
complaint on a stray animal and by the time they are able to
respond to the call, the animal will be back on its owner's
property. Unless the complainant is willing to press charges
and testify in court, our officers are unable to take any
action although the animal is still unrestrained. Needless to
say, the workload in this division does not allow the officers
r
Amendments to Animal. Control Ordinance
January 11, 1984
Page 2
the luxury of sitting and waiting for the animal to wander
off of the owner's property.
in order to eliminate this problem and to increase the
effectiveness of our enforcement activities, we have proposed
amending the Animal Control Ordinance to establish what is
known as a leash law. This amendment will require that an
animal be restrained by a leash, fence, or enclosed structure
at all times regardless of whose property the animal may be on.
Thus, our officers will be able to take action on these
complaints without the testimony of the complainant and without
having to observe the animal wandering off of the owner's
property,
MANDATORY REC;7STRATION
During the Council workshops on the 1983-84 Budget, we discussed
the needs and benefits of a mandatory registration program
for all owned dogs and cats within the City. This ordinance
establishes the basic guidelines for such a program and
provides a penalty for noncompliance. As you may recall,
the registration fees for this program have been establish,-ki
in the general fee ordinance adopted by the Council at a
previous meeting. The basic fee structure contained in the
ordinance establishes an annual fee of $5,00 per animal for
animals that have not been spayed or neutered and a fee of
$3.00 per animal for those animals rendered permanently
incapable of procreation,
Should the Council approve this ordinance, we would recommend
that a grace period of sixty days be established before the
ordinance is actually enforced. This grace period will allow
us to publicize the program and begin the initial registration
effort. The Denton Humane Society has volunteered to assist
us in mass registration effort to be conducted prior to the
enforcement of this ordinance. We anticipate that the required
registration renewal process can be handled by mail in future
years.
Although we have discussed these issues on previous occasions,
we feel that it is important to restate the anticipated benefits
of this program. A brief summary of these benefits is as follows:
Amendments to Animal Control ordinance
,Tanuary 11, 1964
page 3
I, public Health
A. Establish number and location of animals
within the City. Will allow for the
direct notification of animal owners
in an area should a rabies epidomic occur.
B. insure compliance with existing rabies
vaccination laws and regulations.
C. Lessen the holding time of animals at
the Animal Control Center, thus reducing
crowded conditions and possible exposure
to transmittable diseases.
IT, Operations
A. Lessen the holding time of animals at
the Center, thus reducing holding costs
and time spent on Center maintenance
activities.
B. Establish number and location of animals
within the City so that services and
budgets can be planned appropriately.
TIT. Revenues
A. Increase revenues for the Animal Control.
Division to provide funding for additional
personnel to meet- increasing demands
for service.
B. Place some of the burden for funding on
animal owners without further penalizing
the general taxpayer who may or may not
own pets.
During the last few months, we have discussed this program with
both the Humane Society and some of the local veterinarians.
~Phe l umane Society has expressed their support for the program
and lave offered to promote and participate in the registration
effort. Several of the local veterinarians have expressed their
support of the program and have offered to assist in the
promotion of such a program.
1
Amendments to Animal Control Ordinance
January 11, 1964
Page 4
i
Some questions have been raised concerning the ability to
enforce such an ordinance alid the anticipated successfulness
of the prograr-+. Although it is impossible to guarantee the
success of thi3 program, it is safe to say that successfulness
will be dependent on the amount of support the program receives
from groups like the Humane Society and the local veterinarians,
9sed upon the input Nye have received at this timo, T would
iy that we are well on the way to establishing an effective
program,
should you have any comments or questions on this matter, please
let us know,
Bill Angelo
BA/sc
Attachment
w
NO.
AMENDING ORDINANCE ENDING CHAPTER 4 ("ANIMALS") OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TO REQUIi.t CERTAI.J
ANIMALS BE RESTRAXNED BY A LEASH, FENCE OR ENCLOSED •'TRUCTURE
AND ADDING ESTNEW SECTION ASLtSHIN13 FEESVITHEREFORI TREQUIRING REGISTRATION
V 1p~ a~200p00) CATS) DOLLARS DI FOR i VIOLATION PENALTY EXCEED THEREOFt
TAGS O TWO WOVN
PROVIDING FOR SEVERASILITY CLAUSEI AND DEC'.ARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION 1.1.
That Section 4-1 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas be amended to read as followai
"Section 4-1, Animals Running at Large Prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for an owner of any dogs cat, horse,
pony, mule, cattle, goat, sheep, pig, sow or other livestock
to fail to restrain said animal leash, fenced yard or
regard
responsenclosed iblestructure, vlolationowner of this holdwiprima facia
to the person's mental state or intent."
SECTION II.
That Chapter 4 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas is hereby amended by adding a new Section 4-23 to
read as follows,
"Section 4-23. Registration i Identification of Dogs 6 Cats
p
of a onthsooEoage ashellt
1. Rn thera"o~ CnrIsloverefoucw(4) m
within thirty (30) days of the time the person becomes Cue
owner of said animal, and each year thereafter, register
said animal with the animal control officer of the City.
An owner within the City temporarily shall not be required
register
period g of o more t than WiliCh sixty (60) days. within the
City
2. Procedure and Fees: The owner of a dog or cat required
stared herein shall register such animal each
to be rag
year on forms provided by the animal control officer,
Each animal to be registered must have a current rabies
vaccination certificate. The registration ear for Owners
animal shall be five dollars ($5.00) peto the animal
who submit written proof, satisfactory
charged a register stof ethree
officer, t
control incapable of procreation shall animal
dollars ($3.00) per year.
3. Registration CertiCicatest Identification Tags
a) Upon proper registration of the animal and payment of
the proper fee the owner shall be issued a registra-
tion certificate and animal identification tag which
PAGE 1
shall be valid for one year. The tag shall contain a
re istration number, E ective date as such other
information as the animal necessary
b) The tog shall be affixed to the collar or harness of
the animal register d and the owner shall unuae said
collar or harness with affixed tag to be worn at all
times by said animal.
i information acontainedn ono aalter or
c) oit shall bliterate b any unlawful
identificatiggon tag. owne d) obtain ha taduplicatelost
llar
upon payment d of hea one r doshall
($1.00) fee.
SECTION 111.
That Sections 4-24 through 4-30 of Chapter 4 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton are hereby amended to reserve
said sections for future use as follows;
"Sections 4-24 through 4-30. Reserved.
SECTION IV.
That any person violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding
Two Hundred dollars ($200.00); and each day and every day that
the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a
separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in addition to
and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be available at law
and equity.
SECTION V.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application t:iereof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of
competent ,jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the
validity of tho remaining portions of this ordinance, and tho
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it
would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such
invalidity.
PAGE 2
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDINQ THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE
N0. 83.06 RELATING TO PUNNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 50 PROVIDING FOR
THE ADDIYTON THERETO OF A HANDBALL/ RACQUETBALL RECREATIONAL
FACILITY, AS THE SAME APPLIES TO APPROXI- MATELY 8.9$6 ACRES OF
LAND CUT OF THE ALEXANDER HILL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 623, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS;
SECTION
That Ordinance No. 83-06, having been passed and approved by
the Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on February 1, 1983t 6
her?by.amended and reenacted in its entirety to hereafter read as
follows;
The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the following
described property, to-wit;
All that certain 9..101 acre tract, or parcel of land situated in
the Alexander Hill Survey, Abstract No. 623, City and County of
Denton, Texas, said tract being the remainder of tract called 11
3/4 acres in deed from T. P. Burg* to H. F. Hancock as racorded 'z
Volume 170, Page 351 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas,
said tract being further described herein by metes and bounds as
follows;
BEGINNING for the northwest corner of this at the northwest
corner of said 11 3/4 acre Hancock Tract on t~s west line of the
aforementioned Hill survey, a steel rod set in Bernard Street;
THENCE south 89°39' east at 19.9 feet a crosstie corner post,
overall 600.0 feet with fence to steel rod set at the northeast
corner of said Hancock Tract;
THENCE south 696.65 feet with the general course of old fence line
to a steel rod set 30 feet northerly of the occupied center line
of Lindsey Street;
THENCE south 87°35' west 600.52 feet with the north line of Lindsey
Street to its intersection with the west line of the aforementioned
11 3/4 acre Hancock Tract;
THENCE north 408.7 feet with the west line of said Hancock Tract
to the point of intersection with the south line of tract described
in deed from H. F. Hancock, et ux to Herbert Hancock, Jr., at ux
as recorded in Volume 352, Page 446 of the Deed Records of Denton
County, Texas;
THENCE north 88°1.9' east at 12 feet the start of retaining wall and
, fence, overall 162.18 feet to three inch pipe post for the south-
,
east corner of said Harbert Hancock, Jr. Tract;
THENCE north 0`47' west at 74.25 feet fence corner, overall, 73.0
feet t the northeast corner of said Herbert Hancock, Jr. Tract;
THC;CE south b8°lS' vest lb1.15 feet parallel to fence on sc":tt,
side of said Herbert Hancock Tract to the west 'Line of afc:e
mentionod 11 3/4 acre tract;
z-16'20/JOE BELL -Fi,C'E
THENCE north 211.7 foot (call 210.0 foot) to the plaoe of beginning
there being 0.145 sores in Bernard Street as it is prosanlily
occupied leaving a not acreage of 8.956 acres of land.
is horaby changed from Single Family "$F-7" District Classification
Use to Planned Dovolopment "PD" District Classification and Use
under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton,
Texas with the following conditionsi
1. Apartments as spsaified and according to the layout of the
attached site plan dated January 3 1983 as drawn by Robert
E. Horn & Associates with the addition of a six (6') foot
j wooden fence erected along the northern and eastern
perimetars of the property prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.
} 2. A handball/racgvetball recreational facility as specified
and according to the layout on the attached site plan as
revised on October 17, 1985 by Robert E. Horn Associates.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denson, Texas, adopted the 14th day
of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the
a City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same
j is heruby amended to show such change in District Classification
and Use.
SECTION 11,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promot$.ng the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonalu . consideration, among other
things for the character, of the strict and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting humnn lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION 111.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984.
ATTEST;
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C, J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Or DE;NTON, TEY.AS
BY
Z-1620/JOE BELEW-PAGE 2
' I
.r-
it
11 1 1 11 ` 1 Il \I 1~ 1 1 I
i,
11 1 f ! 1 f f 1 w
11 / 11
11 M
Z~v
1 1 -
I ` 1
1 1 11Oy0 G[ S
@ el ~ • ~ 1 1 t ~ iii 4.~~ ,1
LLI ~ ! ~ 1 1 1 ' ~ sl • I W
llllll 11 I '1• 1. 1 . /
~ I
•I 1 ,I ~ I
4LR
1~ !
i
I fn
at-
•M' I •r1 yr.. •'r -1 1 ,.i ~~`I ~ it
1 /
JI W
•y 1 / I ~ 1 1 Y J~ 1'~1 j11~
Ir Y. 1 ID'
f' ~ 11Y1D~t1 ~tll[[t
2,1-1 WE PLAN I'1•n'.e'
~y,~ ~~y~y ~ /L /MWIQGNK R• MMI~U Vb,4ti ,Nf
21 1#1
' .wy • f!-i, ~.1 w' .I ~u K//n•(f 1,1,M~.llry.I
111/11w n r'~u WM /n ! r.~ pvw~~.
«.Iw ' uw`...f.Q:. l«i~ lar..r.... ►w: e w 4r....1
1 u.t I ymvYy nla-w
.
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
-U „ BUS, ey SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 17, 1984
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 1014,4 acres of
land located south of Highway 390 and west
of 1-35. (Z-1610)
SUMMARY: Adoption of the accompanying ordinance and
service plan will finally accomplish
annexation of this property.
ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt the ordinance and service
plan. ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6)
AFFIRMATIVE VOTES.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to adopt ordinance and service
plan,
2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan.
3. Table.
SOURCE OF FUNDS; Departmental Budgets
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.
EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance
2. service Plan
3. Map
Charles S, Watkins
Senior Planner
AN 6RDI8ANf:E ANNEXINO A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OT DENTON, TEXA$i BEING ALL THAT LOT, 'TRACT OR PARCEL Or
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1014.4 ACRXS OF LAND LYING Al1D
BEING SITUATED IN THt COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND W NC
PART OF THE B,B.B. i C,R,F. Co. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 192, W,
BRYAN SUM'EY, ABSTRACT 110. 1461 0. PERRY SUP.VEY, ABSTRACT NO,
1040 A.' COBERLY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1142 AND THE J, SCOT:
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1222, DENT ON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE
SAME A$ AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPLRTYI AND DECLARING At:
CFFECTIVt DATE,
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular Neeting of the city council of the City of Denton, Texas,
on trio petition of the City Of Denton, Texae{ and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, ar, a public hearing ~~ld
o r s not purpose on the irk day Q ..nc-w 1k c ; 1663 in the
f-----
Council Chamber for all interested persons so state tneit t•iews
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by finis
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, in opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing ;,eld
f0t that purpose on the / dap of r , l°63 in the
Council Chamber for all interested persons to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective sate, and after the public hearings,
NOW, MRKORE, THE COUNCIL Or THE CI".•Y OF DENTON, :ERAS,
HEREBY OrGAINSI
ISEMON '
That the O reiM ter described tract of :and be, ano the same
is neteby annexed to the City of Denton„ Texas, ant the sane is
bade hereby a part of said City and the 1s0 and the q esent and
futa:e innac:tants thereof snail oe entitled to a' trc .:cots and
.;i_eces of caner t:t..ene of said Inc snail .e :C_nc e••
tr,e acts and ordinances of said . now in effect c: ...,•c•. ",a:
:e:eafte: :e eAncloc anc ,'e ,:clot ty s:..:a:ed .Lire:.. s'.a.1 Le
:C :Ea: .n l :ayes .e'..eC
the City, ;ne tract of lane nereoy annexed :s described as
follows, to-wit,
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being sit" "t
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, ano being part of the
B.D.B. a C.R.N. Co, Survey, Aostract No. 482, W, Bryan Survey.
Abetted% No. 146, J,,Perry Survey, Abstract No, 1040, A. Coberiy
Su r 1222 eand Abeingc moreo particuarly the 0. as So.lrlows, r,Aatract Nc.
BEGINNING at & po,in% in the present city limits as established :y
ordinance No, ?5-26, said point being the intersection of the
nerttii-o Oyht-Gine aot ltht ine G,of s Jim F, Chr iltal Road with the wess
THENCE south 89036110" west along the north right-of•way line of
said Jim Christal Roar, same being said present city limits, a
distance of 64E•:4 feet tc a point for a corner;
}1SNCE ncrt-h 21051' west along said present r:ty 11t6its a distance
cf 148,5 feet to a point for a corner;
7HE14CE north 68009' east gang said present city Iina is a distance
cf too fee: to a point f01 a cornet :r, the Westr;gnt-of-wkl line
o£ said G.C. t S,T. Rai::oad;
:HENCE nortn 21151' west along the present City limits aF
established by ordinance No. 65-43, Same being the Vest
right-of-wav cf said G.C. 4 S.F. Aa11:oad a;distance of 292E._E
pint for a corner, said point 1,'ing 300 feet south cf
feet to a ei
the centerline of J• C. Highway 360;
THENCE north 88°50' west along the present city limits as
established by ordinance No. 69, 40, 100 feet south of and para':.lel
a distance of
with the n 2941311 feet to a point for aa eorenett
approximately
No. )h18ns arse-tanceeof 221E f etst:aa
TNCZ stablished toy o°rdlinance east
e
point for a cornet;
THENCE north 88°45'S5" west alone said present City limits a
distance of 300 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE north along said present city limits a distance of
feet to a point .for a corner;
THENCE nortn 88°50' west alone the present - city l icit<_ as
established oy ordinance No. 65-4C, 100 feet souct of and pars::e1
with the centerline o: J. •5, tB19nwa5, 360, a distancE cf
approximately 1561,1: feet to a point fcr a corner;
THENCE so-tn alone the present city 1irA tt, as estate sned Gy
K dinanre tao, 82•S2, 1250 feet east 01 and paralle'. wits. the
centet line c,` Under wooo 5oad a e:stance cf approx iaato :y 3,0C + feet
to a point fcr a Corner said Feint :yiny in the centerline C:
said :resent C:t: Brits same oethe
°*E E;;CE estc, .y a.o
Cen teIne Cf Cn::Stai nGad a d:ftanCE Gf iFF2CX:;ua:E` .[S
feet t0 t scLnt for a cCrntr;
_ _ SE :cast.. i',. 3~ L•f :c...5;. r.:
THEhCL' east along said present cir 2imita a cistence of 60SS feet
to a point for a oornert
feecCionob point rth & oror said Present city limits a distance of 3972,0f
said preaht city limits a
of t 4436110 1. lto aeaPCLht st along: Cornell
dlacaace north
THEr~`CE north 21•:1' vest along the present city limiLa as
art$ of of 2 land, mote L
e shed by Ordinance e contairing 1014,4 tance
l&ce 01
plan Of b~ginnir,y
loss.
SECTIO\1 15.
The above described property is hereby olassif:ec as AQricul~
turai "A" District and shall so appeal on the official z0hin4 map
of the City of Denton, Texas, Vnicr map is hereby amended
accordingly.
b•
This ore:r,ance shall be effective immediately upon its pas '
:ntrodueed before the City Counc:'_ or. tne4a!"j day of 1.
y of
PASSED ANt APPROVED py the City Council on the da
IIC9AnD 0. STE'++xFT~ N.Ay'C'A
CITY OS DEt; N , TIXAS
ATTESTi
CEAFLOTTE A LEt:, CITY SECnETkk)'
Ci T OF Dt. ,ITON , TLKAS
A'r'rRGVEO A£ TO LEGAL FOPMt
C. TAYLOF, ,JA. , CST:' ATTOF.Kc
C:TY OF nn"- `N, TEX:.S
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passago of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service,
1. Basic Service Plan
A, Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
j date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic co,,itrol devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texa:!,
E, Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J, Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L, MisceIIaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately G months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as;
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city,
Him
m 14. On' Old
• ?y
p~e Ho klna glut Mound e• . Rio
1 • • x \
• I l N •
~ ~ u •I • ~ ~ WEId Cotr,Rd
• • • 2, 4 ~Cre,4
\ a Chin Rd.
liodeck Rd, ae~h' „ • I : 'I'1'
C
• r• p kd • ' . oroneh 114 I ~l• m f It
11 r •
I old
FAs old
' 1J T
DEN ON
• E 73 ~ ) . as ~p0i 39.074 I 1 r
a0C 4$4 . ~ ~ ~ I. • • • ~ c~
I O r V1 I. ' .1 ti r
e` ,-Jackson ad. ~Rd
o.
a"c • • e 'o p
m '
Q `OO ' Is - t t r r„
t •I\ u • a J 0
it
rA of . • r
~ ,vi~ 380' .v 4.~
Y Yp
1 c roe e i r ti~
0 • t +T-~- + ~
Nlnl f hrleiol •RQ of
i .a
\ Y `~.Ly 'iy! it i~ • I' •
T. N, Ski Ise Rd
T, Skil d • • rc'~'~ Fp'" r9 0
* .f SIS 74 1 ti1~-- ;r
R , To.m tol• d
wdt
01
f p yx Rd. • • Cor I •
' r s Ceen. Rd. . E _
A f5
• E q
a 'JSO Br0 Ad..,. ~...r,
2449
H, Lively Rd ) . a J~ \k . ,y
y I. J
1L I v I k Rd. a r~ dEronfh •F • JKe Lore ,
p R d _
j • `I 35~° l ' ,
4i / 1
CC' JAllr d
. r~ r 1B r u sh '.'Cf,al ► Rd'., ~ ~ .
v1L0 KJ40 p.;. ,r. TAT x~
RJR Johnson n~ _ {
CITY COUNCIL A0ENDA
RACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 17, 1964
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 43.9 acres of land
located west of I-35 west and south of the
existing city limit line. (Z-1611)
SUMMARY: Adoption of the accompanying ordinance and
service plan will finally accomplish
annexation of this property,
ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt the ordinance and service
plan. ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6)
AFFIRMATIVE VOTES.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to adopt ordinance and service
plan.
2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan.
3. Table. 4
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental Budgets
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission
recommends approval.
EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance
2, Service Plan
3. Map
"
Charles S. Watkins
Senior Planner
N0.
AN ORD1NhNCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
T AS1 BEItrG ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PkACE11 OF
THE CITY OF DENT( N, •EX
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 43,9 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUkTED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND IZ2NG
TRACT N0, S6, DENTON COUNTY,
PART OF THE 0, gAEt~'STER SURVEY, S XORICULTUML 'A' DISTRICT
TEXASI CLASSIFYING THE SW PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
NHEAEkS, the, requett for anne%ation Wat Lntroduced at a
reqular mectLnq of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
cn the petition of the City of Denton, Texasl and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was affordeo, at a public hearino held
rr i v 1483 in the
for that purpose on the da}' cf
Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their Views
and present ev:oenct bearlnq upon the annexation.provi6ed by tr.is
ordinancei and held
Wr;EFSf.S, an opportunit. wa: affordce, at a pudic nearing
'r day Cf /I ' .~r. I : 1583 i n the
for that purpose on the
Council Charr,bers for all Interested persons to state their views
and present evi6ence bearing upon the annexatieh provided by tr.is
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City 'Of Dentor„ Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hear1n9S;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,'
EEPX'SY OF.DkIN5 c
SECT, I_ O_?
the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
Th a d
of Benton, Texas, and the same is
is nereb}' annexed to the City resent and
;cane hereoy a part cf Said City and the land ano the t
'cture ir,hatttants thereof snail be entitled tO all the rignts and
criviieees of other citizens 0f .aid City and sna11 De bound cy
now 4n effect c: wr,:ch "W'.
-he acts ar.d ordinances c. said n C.t• .
sit'JateO thE: e:r<_r.0.• DE
:,ere a: ter BnaC ted LriL thF p: oiler t.
r,c t: ..c trCf a:a ~a:.
•.h:t t0 and f.",a.. ac
t.nExec 5 cescr. ec
,
r
par being situated
excel of and lying ing being and
All that certain tract or more particularly
Inty of Deacon state of Texas, t of the
it, the t
Er0Wster Cot Survey ' Abstract No. 56 and Deing
oescribe6 as folloWSr oint 1 in
SEJINN'.N, at a point in cne present city limii~neeiof p the tract
at the intersection of the vest boun so
describe d, in ordinance No. 69.40 With the s point corner of the , 60 tr actweatoof bend in Panda ce N to the5cenceiline lof 1 lti o
35 'ng $OG
feet
TUWCE toutn 2241'02" west along said present City limits as
estr.blished by ordinance 6540 and $00 fe oet t of and f eeicract deacpibedlen
~1ch the centerline of I,N.35h, a distance of 1427 56 feet to e
point for a corner in the south boundary
Vclume 725, Pagt 365 of the geed Records of Denton Coun1SYneTOfesaid
^Y.ENCE north, 64°36'30" veEt a2•ono the sovoint°Ufor 4 corner, same
point
that: a distance of 1206,37 eat to a
DWI; the southWest corner of said wE¢ttbcundary line of said tract
it, the presen-
corner
w- 'CE north 2`<2' east along she
t a distance of i•3227 4 feet to a point ~cr
Ci:~' ,:rui tF LE estitlished b}' CSdinante No
6G'61~/l irul L: a diSLr-.'Ce
TF:EIaCE south e914?, east along the pzpsent tit,
of 1661 22 feet to sne place of Del inrning and containing
acres of land, more or less.
1.1 01C'. Ix
T n e above oescrlbed property, is hereby classified as >,yricv
turai "k"'vistrict. and shall so appear on the official taninl
of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended
accordingly,
SECTION I-:-
This ordinanct shall be effective irAediately upon its passage.
introduced before the City Council on sne ZN day of l"M►
19 day of
PF.SSED AND kPPROt::) by the Cit}' Counci. on the
10
cv- _y
1Y
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS ;
Section 1. Pursuant to ~,he provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of sex-vice;
I, Basic Service Plao
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
mont of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C, Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code ~.)f the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
L, Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
M
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housi,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexatio,, area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J, Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area ma.y use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation, The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L, Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program ((!IP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other neeas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the City,
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation, In this new CIP Manning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
t 4 i
ell
AfRPOR 1 RD tok,I,
•.l• i r.~ ~•j1, r I
e~I ~f
.t1 I •r ~r'1 'tt ~Ily~,y ~'1~ '!Y ~i~iF~;! M"'~/r ,.fa'Frj1 • 1 ,l • 1
I.1 rt wF~1~"r. ~ , ',M'4. ; •M1r 11 1 ~ 4 } 1
v 44.1
.
.41
- y 1 , •lj i,! c~~,Y,~s...~ rr 1.11, 1, N e
~ ' i. ,r~ iii, ~t 1y iF. ~1 f~11. , ' ~1~
Y 1 ?ir < 1~'Y; fir, i'IAt+h v r \ lyLi
1 1 s`~ {A t7. R~~ ~}1 rtr"i/. jli :'7~ •~'f '.•y
1 w , 1''1ti f4 r1 1~'/ 'r `~il9-~+- .J~1 i~
k► ~ 1 ` " Vj!t'"I ~ . X11 IR.l•" .y K , '1 '
' , • ~ F. ~ ~{F'. •'y ti~ 1 .'Y .4 {f • y ' H '7': may, 1~'.
' J1 al +.V tY , Jrf\, lt. 1 i l r!. r
.~y 1~j, 'FYI h,y~. c~ k • I. '.f ill it.w j 1~ ~ f.G , '/,t - ~ PFJi.^.
/ )Ittl1~r i. 'CT 1 1~'.r• / Y ' 1f~, 1. i`1. , ~ ~
/ • w.A•I!` 1"i 1~ i{1 elf r', L, 1 1,.. , `
/ '1 • ~ r~. ♦ S' ~.1 ' 1 r " J 't 4 ~ ~ • ,~i;l 1 j' ~wfr fit lArli' 40
INN ' :.~•-'ORBtN',RD 'rN , Y;f 1•'~". L.~..i`'-- 'l wt ^y t.''i.
44,
• 1
J '
r i'
l ~t
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~ACiC-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATEt January 17, 1984
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 367 acres of land
located between I-35 west and the Santa Fe
Railroad, (Z-1612)
SUMMARY: Adoption of one of the accompanying
ordinances and service plan will finally
accomplish annexation of this property.
ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt ordinance and service plan.
ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6) AFFIRMATIVE
VOTES,
ALTERNA'T`IVES : 1. Move to adopt ordinance and service
plan,
2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan,
3. Table,
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental Budgets
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,
EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance #1 and map
2, Ordinance #2 and map
3. Ordinance 03 and map
4, Service Plan
'Ll" ~ L%L,
Charles Watkins
Senior Planner
01'2 5 c~
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF D£NTQNr TEXASI BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL Of
APPROXIMATELY 367 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
LAND BEING SI CONSTUATEDISTING IN OF F COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
THE
PART OF THE 0. BREWSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 56, A. THOMPKINS
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1246, A. HICKMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 521
AND THE J, EDMONSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 400, DENTON COUNTYo
AN EFFECTIVE DAGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
TEXAS) CLASSIFYING DECLARING THE S AS
PROPERTYt
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introdueeo at it
on9the rpemeetin of the tition of the City oCouncil f Denton,f T xthe as sand of Denton, Texas,
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
_ 1983 in
held for that purpose on the /Pp`' day of an-.
the Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance) and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was,tafforded, at a public nearing
meld for tnat purpose on the 1= day of ✓~+"^P~ 1983 in
the council Chambers for all erested persons to state tneir
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation prbvtosd
by this ordinancel and
• WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published to full at least
one time in the official nhwspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearingsr
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINSr
TIONI,.
SEC _
That the hereinafter described oftract Denton, ofland Texas, band ache theme ame
is hereby annexed to the City
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof small be entitled to all the rignts
and privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be sound
by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or Which.
vied
be may hereafter tto andesmalldbeani er its proratatparttoftthettaxesniesr.all
by the City. The tract of lend hereby annexed is described as
follows, to-witf
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, andesngupart of the ct
Brewster Survey, Abstract No. $o, A, Thompkn
No, 1246, A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521 cand th edJ. Sd edsas
Survey, Abstract No, 400 and being more p
followsr
BEGINNING at a point in the pres present city
in It eitinas es abl sheotne
ordinance No, 60-40, said poit lying tersection of
West -of I
A. Hickman Survey, Abstract o.d52lrthe 'outh.
boundaryh line of -way the line
THENCE west along the south ooundary line of said Hickman Survey,
. a distance of 1730 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner,
the soutowest corner of tae said iICKMar) Survey;
same baiag
T;jE;;Ct north ;long the west ooundar'/ lima of toe said Hickman
Survey, a oistanca f c130 feet, r.ure or lass, to a ;oin,t 'or a
corner lytr,; in an east and ,est count, road irbselawni;
•
THENCE west along the center of said county road a distance of
1880 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in the west
east dboundary line of the W. Sajvis uSurvey, Abstract oNo. 011741 the
THENCE north along the east boundary line of W. Sajvia Survey, a
distance of 1100 feet, more or legal to a ppint for a corner, same
being the northeaat corner of the W. Salvia Survey, said point
also lying in an east and west county roads
THENCE west along the north boundary line of the W. Sajvis .Survey,
same being in the said county road a distance of 1500 feet, more
or less, to a point for a corner in the present city limits as
I
500 establishe eastyof Ordinance N. 0 torahs 11, nteaid ne oftI.H.35lying
THENCE north 26051140" east along said present city limits 1244.96
feet, more or less, to a point]
THENCE north 20050112" east along said present city limits a
distance of 3827.79 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in
the west right-of-way line of the G.C. 6 S.F. Railroad
THENCE southeasterly along the present city limits as established
by Ordinance No. 60-40 same being the west right-of-way line of
the G.C. i S.F. Railroad a distance of 9313.85 feet, more or less,
to the Place of beginning and containing 367 acres of land, more
or less.
. SECTION [I. 1
The above described property is hereby classified as Agricul-
tural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map
of the City -of Denton, Texas, Wnich map is hereby amended
accordingly.
SECTION III.
This Ordinance, shall be effective immediately upon its passage,
Introduced before the City Council on the.L,GyyNtlp+ day of
yambitr , 192„•
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day oe
RICHA" 0. MEMO, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEM
A L TT ALLEN, CITY SFCRETAR7
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
+ ♦ , • ~t.r7 I~ ♦ Iti ryr, as+~.. I ~iili3'~i1,il 1~
a di, . ~ , i~, ~ III I f 1 K 1 i
Jackson 1114114 y ~ RI V [I r '~A~;iii lii i ; 3• I •
r • • Ij r • COOS , 'i!l;
~ ~i\ u ~ li'~ N+ p
y o
380' ~ c°>'~ 4.~ ~ • + rCl
ea`os : . y t « s 1
Mir.
• 0 nl •Chils of old
is d . • • ~ • ; 2 s
Rd C,
j' 1 • fl ,«`J,o,e+~ ~%iin~Fi!•(i!:1H~ ~ I / 'Ei •
F&S
Will. .4
T oan • C o I s 1, ~ i. .,2 2: Ib15 + `*1 / 10o a
•
• p r tl a ~ f". . s-..,,. * 3 5 p Od i '3 •
IdV
0.3
. f.% fs• , J.
-tt
F45 i A so ro •1
2449
L$vel 'Ad
O
Ryan d
f
y w ~ f
J' s
• \
COfrufh + • O •
/ VAIlrod "Ad
1., ',J, .wry , Q . iNekory~•Cro*k Rd•
S \ It
:~r*ssatlj'.fa~k .Koplin
PILOT KNOrj
\vi . ~i~ , • -y I
638' i Johnson in
/Mom r • pp~,. O • • io ~ • it I I
. cc~~pp , • 17 ~
401 d
° f ' • , ITV
rd Rd.
crow Mob
~ • ! cord Rd • • °It~
1c d!
*A 1 00
' t •ti h~f , 0 3 G Q • a 'a
V~ . ` • L' Q~ d a ~Ir1C , Us le 14440A4, ~•u I ~ y
v POGO 43 ! H16 n' Mil , •Ad~,
OId JUSIIn d. _ +
~i: •
Nill,
v He 104 IIIIIIIIA mob bid
i Sam 0 a Y I Rd•' r • •MC6104old ~r! a ~,r
• S C a • e
e M~ l ✓ti
~'o2r
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT' TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT' OA PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 307 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING PART OF THE 0, BREWSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 54, A.
THOMPKINS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1246, A. HICKMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO. 521 AND THE J. EDMONSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 400, DENTON
COU1,"1'Y, TF-US; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Taxaa; and
WHEP,EAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the day of , 1984 in
the Council Chambers for all ni-t®rested persons to state their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the day of , 1984 in
the Council Chambers for all `Into asted pe so s s ate their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
'.WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the
present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxes- levied by the City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to-wit;
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part
of the 0. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56, A. Thompkins Survey,
Abstract No. 1246, A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521 and the
J. Edmonson Survey, Abstract No. 400 and being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as establishod
by Ordinance No. 60-40, said point lying in the intersection of
the west right-of-way line of the G.C. k S.F. Railroad with the
south boundary line of the A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521;
THENCE west along the south boundary line of said Hickman
Survey a distance of 1730 feet, more or less, to a point for a
corner, , same being the southwest corner of the said Hickman
Survey;
PAGE O1~E
SHrvey,nardistance fh2130sfoot,~nmore ornlessf, toe as pointiforaa
corner lying in an east and vest county road (Roselawn);
posaid int for county a corner in distance the
THENCE , more along or the
less, to o of
1880 feet west
boundary line of
line of d the o W, Survey, Sajvis Surveyt AbNo. stract t No.
boundary the J.
the ea
1.174;
THENCE north along the east boundary line of W. Sa,jvis Survey, a
distance of 1100 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner,
same being the northeast corner of the W, Sa,jvis Survey, said
point also lying in an east and west county road;
THENCE weat along the north boundary line of the W, Sa3vi►
Survey, same being in the said county road a distance of 500
Ordinance a No corner in tTractBB11 t said
feet, limits more eor logo, to a stablihsad by point
point also lyingg $00 feet east of and perpendicular to the
centerline of 1.11.3$w;
THENCE north 26°51'40" east along sai.d present city limits
1244.96 feet, more or less, to a point;
THENCE north 20°50'12" east along said present city limits' a
distance of 651.21 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner
in the north boundary line of a tract conveyed to Wm, B. Rogers,
at al by deed recorded in Volume 994) Page 652, of the Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE north 89°38" east along the north boundary line of said
Rogers tract a distance of 846.20 feet, more or less to a
point said point being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Sour Way
Addition;
THENCE south 89°12'11" east, along the north boundary line of
said Lot 1, a distance of 483.25 feet to a point for a corner,
said point lying $00 feet west of the east boundary line of'the
0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56;
distance
' oundary oli e, of00saidaBrewsterosurvey, paanraapllel with the
of 700 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying 500 feet
west of and perpendicular to the intersection of the east
boundary of said survey with the southwest right-of-way line of
the G.C, & S.F. Railroad;
THENCE east, a distance of 500 feet to a point for a corner,
of said point
survey lying with the southwest intersection of Gline
.C.
& S.F. Railroad, said point also being the present city limits
as established by Ordinance No. 60-40;
THENCE southeasterly along the present city limits as
established by Ordinance No. 60.40 same being the west
right-of way line of the G.C, & S.F. Railroad a distance of 7000
feet, more or less, to the place of beginning and containing 307
acres of land, mgre or less.
SECTION II.
The above described property is hereby classilied as
Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the )fficial
Zoning nap of the City of Denton, Texas, which map i, hereby
amended accordingly.
PAGE TWO
SECTION 111,
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage,
Introduced before the city Council on the day
of , 1984,
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day
of 1984,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CFARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SEULETARY
CITY OF DENPON,,TEXAS
APPROVED A$ TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE THREE
M
rs.t • k t o n it 'i 1 i ►~1 ~lu~ ~ 11 i : ~ ,
~'r ~ • ~ A r , t., , • : r:, 1'71,: ~ t 5 ldl:. 5
M :r~ J r.. n•'„~'.'ilM i~ r. •`~00~~ ~'1' i~'~' Ij.
ttp
• • yea ia,.r' ,1~ • At "!:..':~~5.
It,
r I
40
X14 „ 4 . 1 ,'I 1
G ,J\ J,., Tom. 1 1 . ♦ >
II .•vs~,.s i •►+:~n+'•lal~la al hd 1 I } i , , i•1-•- -
O • .i (1l'[T] lf~iti'i'•~I t.77•~ \ 4.... ' "'j.-:; v1 T'rL
rti•I..,~ •--'o 'Ile•t'fn,rrrtrl•,•/' ~T4~• ^"'T"-T•^ I} '
Vr •L' a Iii. r~~1 ! , r............
I C/'\•'-rte,
7.1
o,n`.. Co I/c~id. Q1 z,72 SW,yrr_art,tr ~u r + ` .~~•+r i J.
•ra ~r hl C tl r.,s gum p' I .Gl t. it
-'t':^• ••b. t ~to,f~lcrJ• J • Gf .r~l~' \~G
° .~~°r ,e ° c? - t e Corn. Rd, 215+ ~r`
?pia .r.l1Wr .
l~ ~ A,rt ~ ;iL r' yr
IF rip,
0+. L Ivel Y* Ike
r~/QRC?ti • I , I Idle 2 r
~plT. 'rf ~.~~1V,~><~~ f l ttRYen Rd ,~r_~.
'F / t. 3;554 ° ~ l~,,y" ~ t\ • t .kobirr+cPnr
7
1>A11r
1 !Ji/ Jam---► ` '0% .1, ` •;~l v~►•tkory ~Cr.ck kdt
P1LG- KNDB' c°' .i~ .011. t'~ , . • I
r 838 'f 'iohnlcon n ' • 1 i~~ ~ ~ r
r p 11 r
r \ r ''f:/~. ~~f „'/y ~/YeO. 1 t .
Will,
` Z •~•'.G.,•,`•rv~
/ 0 L Fc L . ...i . , a t O 1f rr l ) ' . GJ & It
_ I t t r , \ i n •.,t . SIC: f'-::~
on AL 11 to
~rf i• r ~f 'fls ail R6 •b ^i'~' r 01 Hie t kelr Muir ~G~'vy t`~
G: eG;C .►,H}t'IIIP~' lf r 'RG~ ~~r r
G ~ b k 0 t f >,O • R'+d ? fe t o C t `
I1•!-Ord,`R,r~~~ns'?I'DIO• `R_ ~"`~-t- C',~r .ter'`
C.r~' •/GCfr. ~Cvll•I~Cr~;} f: kQ
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 345.35 ACRES OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS, AND
BEING PART OF THE. 0. BREWSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 56, A.
TKOHPKINS SURVEY, ABSTRAAT NO. 1246, A. HICKMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO, $21 AND THE J. EDMONSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 400, DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY. AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the requeat for annexation was introduced at a
regular ,meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, in opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the day of , 1984 in
the Council Chambers for all nI-terested parsons to state their
views and presant evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity 'was afforded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the day of , 1984 in
the Council Chambers for all interested person- to state their
views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided
by this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the C4ty of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREBY ORDAINSi
SECTION 1.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the
present and futu,;e inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all
the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate
part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to-wit;
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part
of the 0. Brewster Survey, Abstract No, 56, A. Thompkins Survey,
Abstract No. 1246, A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521 and the
J. Edmonton Survey, Abstract No. 400 and being more particularly
described as follows;
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established
by Ordinance No, 60-40, said point lying in the intersection of
the vest right-of-way line of the G.C. & S.F. Railroad with the
south boundary line of the A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521;
THENCE west along the south boundary line of said Hickman
Survey, a distance of 1730 feet, more or less, to a point for a
corner, same being the southwest corner of the said Hickman
Survey;
PAGE ONE
of 2130 feet, more or line of the said Hick-ortan
Survey, north' along the
corner lying in an east and west county road (Rose.lawn),
THENCE west along the center of said county road a distance of
1880 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in the west
boundary line of the J. Edmonson Survey, Abstract No. 400 and
the east boundary line of the W. Sa,jyis Survey, Abstract No.
1174;
THENCE north along the east boundary line of 'J. Sajvis Survey, a
distance oP-,1100 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner,
same being the northeast corner of the W. Sa~via Survey, said
point also lying in an east and west county roe ;
THENCE weat along the north boundary line of the W, Sajvis
Survey, same being in the said county road a distance of 1500
feat, more or lase, to a point for a corner in she present city
limits as establissed by Ordinance No. 69-40, Tract 11, said
point also lying 500 feet east of and perpendicular to the
centerline of 1.H.35W;
THENCE north 26°51'40" east along said present city limits
1244.96 feet, more or less. to a point;
THENCE north 20°50'12" east along said present city limits a
distance of 651421 feet, more or less, to a oint for a corner
in the north boundary line of a tract conveyed to Wm. B. Rogers,
et al by deed recorded in Volume 994, Page 652, 'of the Deed
Records of Denton County,,Texas;
THENCE north 89°38" east along the north boundary line of said
Rogers tract a distance of 846.20 feet, more or less to a
point said point being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Solar Way
Addit~on;
THENCE south 89°12'11" east sloegg the north boundary line of
said Lot 1, a distance of 4 25 East to a point for a corner,
said point lying $00 feet west of the east boundary line of the
0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56;
THENCE north, 500 feet west of and parallel with the east
boundary line of said Brewster survey, an approximate distance
of 700 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying 500 feet
west of and perpendicular to the intersection of the east
boundary of said survey with the southwest right-of-way line of
the G.C. & S.F. Railroad;
THENCE east, a distance of 500 feet to a point for a corner,
said Point lying at the intersection of the east boundary line
of said survey with the southwest right-of-way line of the G.C.
& S.F. Railroad, said point also being the present city limits
as established by Ordinance No. 60-40;
THENCE southeasterly along the present city limits as
established by Ordinance No. 60-40 same being the west
right-of-way line of the G.C. & S.F. Railroad a distance of 7000
feet, more or less, to the place of beginning and containing 307
acres of land, more or less.
SAVE AND EXCEPT all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land
lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State
of Texas, and being part of the 0. S. Brewster Survey, Abst No.
56 of Denton, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed
from Earl 11. Wilson to Sue 11. Wilson by deed recorded in Volume
774, Page 633, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and
more particularly described as follo%,s.
MG E TWO
i
BECINNINO at an old iron pin at a fence corner at the southeast
corner of said 2.11 acre tract and on the east boundary line of
said Brewster Survey;
THENCE 87°03'10" W, with said fence 269.36 feet to a steel pin
at a fence o:+rner on the east line of Bonnie Brae Street;
THENCE N. 20°55' E. with the east line of said Street 420,5 feet
to a stool pin at a fence corner at the southwest corner of a
tract out of said 2.11 acre tract as described in a dead from
L%-sslla Barber to J. H. Howard and wife, on November 14, 1964,
and recorded in Volume 516, Page 140, Deed Records of said
County;
THENCE S. 72°12'40" E. with said fence 124.85 feet to a steel
pin at a fence corner on the east line of said 2.11 acre tract
and of said Brewster Survey;
THENCE South with said fence and said survey line 340.8 feet to
the place of beginning,
CONTAINING in all 1,654 acres of land.
SECTION 11.
The above described property is hereby classified as
Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the day
of , 1984,
of PASSED AND APPROVED98~ the City Council on the day
KM ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
ALLEN, CHARLOTTE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL, FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE THREE
` r 'w"r±: IUt ~IIE I 1=#!~' a i
tin iltd
a ` ~ J O C A '~1~, , L,,, . lj r, : A' fuli• j• ' rt ~'r'1
. wt
. I x ►+.i•Llll,'~Jrl►~l! 01 'lid 1 • ' ; }
' ; ' ' ~I~* t:~lha a . • ,1 1' I i ~ ' , ~ I I'-'l.'. +,2,,~`., 1
. 0"06
jS~1 l~A ~b}.•l~„~~ ww~Till; a I ~ 1 ,'~rv~^J
.'~•J` -i I~ ~.rf•''''r~r"f4,T$r• 1 ~ ' ! j % It l
T O~n C 0 1N~t dr 1•r: e 2 2 ~ I.. It f .1 ` 1
'
~•r. firir' .~'~C' Fi~r~.irr~if~ii:i..• f r b` f""•-• C G~
•a. • clK l'~ f 1 ` c6 ..Zf
~ r,• ~ ~ e irw9~ LoM. ~Y'J`, d. 18 nY:. ,
z rtl5- 9e IrtTBte' r 1
2 s
V IJ
• ~prrvtn >Allre ''R~' .iv • t.` t' ~J~y ,
1 _:~,:1. y H~ckery `'Cra-•It RE•
t f,! ' t ~1 ` po ff 'r8rnP6 '►laaf k' Ti~.~ `'i \ li ~ht~.'I,
/ 'O1Ld' E KNOB
Johnson L6-61,
B o~ti~~~
. ! 4 f C R G . i ✓ ~ • C f e V ry ~ ~ , s CCU . ~ 4 ~ • 1 " w"" ` ~ '~t i ,t t•'
it Ir
4L:
he(
• a' ems. 'L, 14 r. rY 'u_ j ~"~d n.
1/U .-•e-r- r • •i•ii `~tl_ • f ~:IC skQrg N1ii'~L? u ,
cc.
ri r fJ M A -~1V: 6< . 6 F{~ L 1iCs f! I T " A s a _ ,p r
19
C '6 fi a ( 5 Ie• ~~.a-►~~ a ct
+e'e •.t ♦ t ' C ,.rte p ► ' . s + • G i 1
t r " lSer, ^cv s . Rt''.i !1_orrtr+ 'Rd_ ` ~ _~Io. RC r r.
St.
a at
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREAS CITY DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
06 adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;'
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
I. Basic Service Plan
A, Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C, Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D, Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13,06 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
• E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
r
Service Plan
Annexed Areas +
Page two
0 F. Streets
(1) chuckholes, measures Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of azards
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city,
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plurubing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
• H. planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass 'the annexed area.
i . Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J, Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, pants, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
i
service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The GIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand. for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall. city economics.
• The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly.to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
C - U I- LIME-T
MEETING DATE: January 17, 1984
SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 1125 acres of land
located on both sides of Mayhill Road
north of 1-35, (Z-1613)
SUMMARY: Adopption of one of the accompanying
ordinances and service plan will finally
accomplish annexation of this property,
ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt ordinance and service plan.
ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6) AFFIRMATIVE
VOTES
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to adopt ordinance and service
plan,
2, Disapprove ordinance and service plan,
3. Table.
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental Budgets
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission
recommends approval.
EXHIBITS: 1, ordinance #1 and map
2. Ordinance #2 and map
3. service Plan
a4, -
Charles Watkins
Senior Planner
0125g
r
NO,
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON, T4XAS1 BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND BEING SITUATEDTINGTHE COUNTYIOFTDENTON, STATE OF FTELAND XAS AND LYING SEING
PART OF THE J. TAFT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 12$6, J. WHITE SURVEY,
SURVEY, ABSTRACT ABSTRACT 1433, NO. D. HOUGH 184,, t4.9- P. Y i ,PH. R P.R.R. CrSUNO. RVET 6461 D. NO.
950 AND THE G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1330, DENTON COUNTY,
TEXASi CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
PROPERTY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request tot annexation was introduced at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texast and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was ffoeded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the iA ~ day of 0g. fe : , 1983 to
the Council Chambers upon persoog to
provided
evidence
views and present
cy this ordinances and
dHER£AS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing
held for that purpose on the / day of 6 0 , 1983 in
the Council Chambers for all interested persons to state tneir
views and present evidence beating upon the annexation provided
by this ordinances and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the ofticir.1 newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effectiwa date, and after the public hearingsi
VOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
HEREHY ORDAINS,
SECTION
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the
same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the
same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and tl,e
present and future inhabitants thereof shall oe entitled to all
the rights and privileges of otner citizens of said City and
shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in
effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property
situated therein snall be suo}eot to ann shall bear its prorate.
part of the taxes levied by ene City, The tract of land hereby
annexed is described as follows, to-wi'.i
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of
the J. Taft Survey, Abstract No. 1256, J. White Survey, Abstract
No. 1433, D, Hough Survey, Abstract No, 646, D, Lambert Survey,
Abstract No. 184, M.E.P. & P,R,R. Survey, Abstract No. 950 and
the G. Walker Survey, Abstract-. No. 1330 and snore particularly
described as follows,
BEGIN14I1IG at a point in the present city limits as established
tne
tact 11,
oy Ordinance No, y T
with
of the east right-of-way said line point aMaynillinRoad at
• a point 150 feet northeast of and perpendicular to the
0en:erline 04 '..H, *$5-rj
-5
•
nTHENCE ortheasterly eof Band parallel awiithprthe centerline of Ott limitsf 750 foot
appproximate distance Of 5812.8 foot to a point for a corner in
t
THENCE ho present city limits) y
lishod north 1141 aNo. alog the resent distanceo of 917140 feeto to ba
corner said point lying 600 feet southeasterly of and perpen-
dicular to the southeast right-of-way line of Loop 2881
THENCE lished by Ordinance northeasterly No, a165943 Tract present 1, 600 city lSoutheasterly aof
and parallel with the east right-of-way line of Loop 288 to the
east boundary line of the J. Taft Survey, Abstract No. 1256 same
being the west boundary line of the J. Cheek Survey, Abstract
No. 3241
TCE establishedt by0Orcinanoe No. 72-56 a distances of o939,60ieast to
a point for a corner, same being the Southwest corner of the
said J, Cheek Surveys
THENCE south 89411135" east along maid present city limits, same
being the south boundary line of the said J. Cheek Survey, a
distance of 601,2 feat to a point for a corner,
THENCE nortn 89016120" east along said lines a distance of
559.44 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE east alonQ the present city limits as established by
. Ordinance No, 81-94 a distance of 2080.56 feet, more or leas, to
a point for a corner in the .aayhill Road same being the west
boundary line of the G. Walker Survey, Abstract No, 13301
THENCE north 'along raid present city limits and the west
boundary line of said Walker Survey, a distance of 1228.21 feet
to a point for a corner,
THENCE east along said present city limits a distance of 1817.08
feet to a point for a corner,
No. 88 a t disarrce en of 1306.77 1 feet to
THENCE established south by lOrrdinance west 31
a point, for a corner)
T4iENCE south 88115145" east along said present city limits a
distance of 792,29 feet to a point)
THENCE south 87437154" east along said present city limits a
distance of 831.02 feet to a point for a corner,
THENCE south 1641'08" west along said present city limits a
distance of 541.96 Peet to a point for a comic)
THENCE south 87111136" east along said present city limits a
distance of 2405.17 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE south along the east line of a tract conveyed to Bonnie
Coonrod by deed recorded in Volume 432, Page 154 of the Deed
Records of Denton County, Texas, a distance of 1608 feet, nore
or less, to a point for a corner, same being the southeast
corner of said Coonrod tract,
• THENCE west along the south boundary line of said Coonrod tract
a olstance of 3dU feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in
tr,a avast ooundary line of a north ano south county roaa, mown
as Swisner koaal
THENCE south along the west boundary line of said Swisher Road a
distance of 4186 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner,
said point being the intersection of the west boundary line of
said Swisher Road wth the north boundary line of an east and
west county road known as Pockrus Roadl
THENCE west along the north boundary line of said Pockrus Road,
a distance of 4500 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner
in the present city limits, as established by Ordinance No,
78-38, Tract III
THENCE north 37048104" west alongy said present city limits a
distance of 382.6 feet to a point for a cornarl
THENCE north 4406131" east along said present city limits a
distance of 395.07 feet to a point for n corner)
THENCE south 88609141" east along said present city limits a
distance of 597,01 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE north 4402126" east along said present city limits a
distance of 1203.3 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE north 4105120" east along said present city limits a
distance of 73$,19 East to a point for a corner)
THENCE north 4034157" east along the present city limits as
established by Ordinance No. 83-16, a distance of 735,64 feet to
a point for a cornarl
THENCE south $7157130" east along said present city limits a
distance of 28.94 feet to,a point for a corner)
THENCE north 21061 east along said present city limits a
distance of 1154,4 feet to a point for a cornarl
THENCE north 88029' west along said present city limits a
distance of L489.1 feet to a point for a oornarl
THENCE South 2125130" west along said present city limits a
distance of 1140.8 feet to a point for a cornarl
THENCE south 4413'44' west along said present city limits a
distnace of 719.12 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE south 10651'09" west along the present city limits as
established by Ordinance no. 78-38 a distance of 46.68 feet to a
point for a corner)
THENCE south 31°41' west along said present city limits a
distance of 66 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 54631150" west along said present city ?Amiss a
distance of 88 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE soutn 78441120" west, along said present city limits a
distance of 100 :set to a point for a corner)
THENCE south 50047150" west along said present city limits a
distance of 198.49 feet to a point for a corner)
THENCE south 36039130" west, along aaid present city limits a
distance of 339,84 feet to a point for a corners
THENCE south 22434140" west along said present city limits a
tistance of 151.74 feet to a point for a ~ornert
THENCE south 16440' west along said present city limits a distance
of 615 feet to t• n place of beginning and containing 1125 acres of
land, more or less,
SECTION 11,
The above described property la hereby classified as Agri-
cultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official toning
map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended
accordingly,
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage,
Intr duced before the City Council on the 9-L-1 L day of
AIAYO~kj_ &r 194a.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of
R AR 0. 9TEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECUTARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEOAL FORMi
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYl
1
•
\ r w
oil
t:li C1
2 5 i j rl : Aa
j .L~4,~/ •I ;:.y1.-.-'-titi•'. tia•3'::_` -'1 i
tot
~ , ~ ` • -ti's , j
~E" 'a, E ~ \ . 2 ~ ` ' f'o t t ! r l a 6 k: .ti~ v'j~'• ~
« /1111 if `
one C)
I ` • 't!•- `-~'•`''f fit- •;r r
old
' A SHAD SHORES I r
lLOn1 • Pop g5C p -z- "
•'R On • • ' ~ ~ ~ ~y SnOCySSO~EtNid - ,
r Rd
IR •'Rd arth•
CO INTH'
POP 4
v
Hickory C►E0 k Rd' . ° I vsOn
1 /•3,
• /old 13 C cK.
o ` /futon I` ~7 ( -~~1 r~ r
/ • E . 1 q~ . yr. y~/ r
~~f \0 X8.6 r 77 LAK'E ~f
c 216= Lh r o4 R. VI Y/ 1 r
FIELD C'-C
' \ d~ 1 3 ~e as ",7 HICKORY r LAK
f' CREEK DALLj
POP 1.4
rg• V ~`V+•-~:~" - ; s'•; I p.. POP 2~A-
• M1e•kor MfM}'Rd•oo'., I i, I v x -
• . 2 IT.pi 0'hl =Hilt 'ynE C iii. J`• y t if n( 'i
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF D1:'PITON, TEXAS' BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 348 A(.'RES OF LAND LYING AND
BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING
PART OF THE J. TAFT SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130. 1256, J. WHITE SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO, 1433 D. HOUGH SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 646 D. LAMBERT
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 40. 784, M.E.P. 6 P.R.R. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 950
AND THE G. WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a
ragul4%r meeting of the City Council of the City of Dentuu, Texas,
on the petition of the City of Denton, ^'exas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the /.P-A/' day of p<./yler , 19 3;i , in the
Council Chambers for all _rn-terested persons to state'_treir views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity wv afforded, at a public hearing hold
for that purpose on the ~ day of de.,,Grv , 19.73 , in the
Council Chambers for all -interested persons to state tieir views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinanbe has bren published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas,
prior to its effective date, and alter the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TE.KAS,
HEREBY ORDAINS,
Section 1.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be subject to
and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by the City.
The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit;
Tract I All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and baing situated
in the county of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the J. Taft
survey, Abst. No. 1256, J. White survey, Abst. No. 1433 D. Hough
survey, AbsC. No. 646, D. Lambert survey, Abst. No. 75'4 and the
M.E.P. & P.R.R. survey, Abst. No. 950 and more particularly
described as follows;
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by
Ordinance No. 65-43, ?Tact II; said point also lying at the
intersection of the ea..<•t right-of-way line of Mayhill Road with a
point 750 feet northeast of and perpendicular to the centerline of
I.H.35E;
THENCE 'Northwesterly along said present city limits, 750 feet
northeasterly of and parallel with, the canterline of I.H.35E an
approximate distance of 5812.8 feet to a point for a corner in the
present city limits;
PAGE ONE
f ;
THENCE North 1°42' East along the ppresent city limits as
established by Ordinance No. 80-38, a distanoe of 917.4 foot to
a point for a corner, said point lying 600 feat southeasterly of
and perpendicular to the southeast right-of-way line of Loop 288;
eotablished,ybystOrdyinanoongNothe65 p43, sen Tractity1, 1600ts feet
southeaster ly o f and parallel with the east right-of-way line of
Loop 2880 to the east boundary line of the J. Taft survey, Abet.
No. 1256, same being the west boundary line of the J. Cheek
survey, Abst. No. 324;
THENCE South 0.1154'02" West,,along the present city limits as
established by Ordinance No. 72.56, a distance of 939.6 feet to
a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of the J.
Cheek survey, Abet. No. 314;
THENCE South 89°11135" Eaat, along said present city limits,
same being the south boundary line of the J.. Cheek survey a
distance of 601.2 feet to a point for a corner, same being the
northeast corner of the J. White survey, Abst. No. 1433 and the
northeast corner of the D. Hough survey, Abet. No. 646;
THENCE South, along the east boundary line of the J. White
survey, same being the west boundary line of the D. Hough survey
to a point for a corner in the Southwest right-of-way line of
the M.R. & T. Railroad;
THENCE Southeasterly along the southwest right-of-way line of
the M.K. & T. Railroad to a point for a corner at the
intersection of the east right-of-way line of Maybill Road with
the Southwest right-of-way' line of the M.K. & T. Railroad, said
point lying in the present city limits as established by
Ordinance No. 78-38, TTAct.1;
THENCE South 50°47'50" West, along said present city limits, a
distance of 198.49 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE South 36°39"30" West, along said present city limits,, a
distance of 339.84 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE South 22°34'40" West, along.said present city limits, a
distance of 151.74 feet to a point for a corner,
THENCE South 16°40' West, along said present city limits, a
distance of 615 feet to the place of beginning and containing
235 acres of land more or less.
All that certain lot or tract of land lying and being situated
Tract II ; in the county of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the G.
Walker survey, Abst. No. 1330 and more particularly described as
follows;
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point
lying at the most easterly southeast corner of the tract as
described, in Ordinance No. 78-38, Tract II;
THENCE North 4°34'57" Eaet, along the said present city limits,
a distance of 577 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner;
THENCE East,, a distance of 1444.6 feet, more or leas, to a point
for a corner, said point being the northwest corner of a tract
of land conveyed to Gilbert Wa,drip by deed recorded in Volume
1032, Page 971, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE South 83°14'21" East, along the north boundary line of
said tract, passing at 446.61 feet the northeast corner of said
tract, same being the northwest corner of a tract conveyed to
PAGE TWO
rate Rd. Joint Venture by deed recorded in Volume 1219, Page
38 , of the dead records of Denton County, Texas, and oontinuiug
for, a total distance of 1575.94 feet to a point for a corner,
same being the northeast corner of said Page Rd. Joint Venture
tract;
THENCE South 1°59'46" East, along the east boundary line of said
tract, a distance of 355.27 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE South 2°04'27" East, along the east bounary line of said
tract, a distance of 497.33 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE South 2°21'48" West along the east boundary line of said
tract, a distance of 31$.27 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE South, along the east boundary line of said tract a
distance of 165.27 feet to a point for a corner,, same being the
southeast corner of said tract, said point lying in Page Road;
THENCE North 85°14'21" West along the south boundary line of
said tract, along Page Road, a distance of 1264.7 feet to a
point for a corner, same being southwest corner of said tract;
THENCE North 3°29'42" East, along the west boundary line of said
tract, a distance of 738.6 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE West, passing at 463.5 feet the southeast corner of a
tract conveyed to L. C. Dupree by deed recorded in Volume 530,
Pag•a 54, and continuing fo'c a total distance of 798.5 feet to a
point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of said
Dupree tract and the southeast cornea of a tract conveyed to
Richard H. Barca by deed'.recorded in Volume 543, Page 496, of
the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE 89°58'20" West, along the south boundary line of said
Barca tract, a distance of 481.26 feet to a point for a corner,
same being the southeast corner of a tract conveyed to Andrews
Corporation by deed reenrded in Volume 912, Page 790, of the
Deed Records of-Denton County, Texas;
THENCE North 86°06'50" West, along the south boundary line of
said tract, a distance of 621.96 feet to the place of beginning
and containing 63 sores of land more or less.
All that certain tract or parcel of land lying' and being
situated in the county of Denton, State of Texas, being part of
Tract ITT; the G.' Walker survey, Abst. No. 1330 and more particularly
described as follows;
BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established
by Ordinance No. 83-13, said point being the most southerly
southwest corner of the tract as described in said ordinance and
the northwest corner of a tract conveyed to Bonnie Coonrod by
deed recorded in Volume 432, Page 194, of the Deed Records of
Denton County, Texas;
THENCE South 87°11'36" East, along the said present city limits,
same being the north boundary line of said Coonrod tract, a
distance of 500.6 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE South, 500 feet east of and parallel to the west 'boundary
line of said Coonrod tract, a distance )f 1595 feet, more or
less, to a point for a corner in the soutt, boundary line of said
Coonrod tract;
THENCE North 39°46'31" East along the south boundary line of
said Coonrod tract, passing at 147.67 feet the northwest corner
of a tract convcved to Park Services, Inc. by deed recorded in
PAGE THREE
Volume 1243, Page 604 of the Deod Records of Denton County,
Texas, and continuing for a total disr.f,nue of 15$1 feat to a
ppoint for a corner, some being the northeast corner of said Park
Services, Inc. tract and lying in a north and south road known
as Swisher Road;
THENCE South along the east boundary line of said Park Services,
Inc. tract and in said road, a distance of 678.27 feet to a
point for a corner, same being the sou0.east corner of said Park
Services, in•c. tract;
THENCE South 89038'54" West, along the south boundary of said
Park Services, Inc. tract passing at $89.39 feet the most
southerly southwest corner and continuing for a total distance
of 2051 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE North passing at 71AI, feet the southwest corner of said
Coonrod tract and continua along the west boundary line of
said Coonrod tract a total distance of 2304 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 50 acres of land more or less.
SECTION 11.
The above described property is hereby classified as
Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official
zoning map 'of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby
amended accordingly.
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage.
Introduced before the City Council on the day
of /V,, J, )I 6e r , 1983 .
PASSED ?.'VD APPROVED 'by the City Council on the day
of , 1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORDS:
C. J TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: _
PAGE FOUR
: 7: 'Aw.lr1',~ 1 . r ; f Mi, I' 1'~r w . ~.f'f ~,r .fir ~ • . • • ~ ~ 4 • t ~ ^1
1/~'' 711 1 f r . . ' ~ Q
' .1 M. ,•.1'1r r • 'r
knt~
77
G ~~`'t • Tray: ~ •,f :!i' P / .
+ ! ~ r . ~ I ~ it i i t 1 C~1~L~
lip
-11110
r~ 1 •"f I ~r ''r I ~ ,.:I~.j• 1 ,r'.~`1 652 E+ •i {i•••~~~ ~~/J/
~ [ ,r Q,~ ~ i ',::1 fOft~~.~~ / ..11.1.. .
by ~ '~\.%f '~C •1.~~
Its
r,._ G a~ I! fay , . ~ r • ~ F~
Garr.. ,~rf ~d. 6 00
'Qe=-+' z-•r=• ';1/
66
tt '.tl ITi j;'i
S
r 1(1C ` ~rFN. Cn S40
~opCY
i ''r .•Rroe !td ew,,. Re ~~RIN"f
rob
-pop
• NO ' .r, f . •.Y: I ' Y r 1JS0~'', , f~•r.. >ti..-~-'~. Sl1 i
14.: r `mac-11~~
• thlekerp ~Cr~~Y 'R1"' j. r. 3b lli
•.,e .d /Ofd}„ : S r`♦, 1 •!:r'
~ Ir, a /~E.b ,i. •1,w FIE.
aw,' ~ r'r1 J • e s „'cJ"` ~I/I Gplr0 RY t ~Y. e, Ispw=
I. f t,o t, \ e F ~ . P U 2 E ~ r .w
.ter7 Hitf'p~~.~, v t's`•'~~e ` r~ t;'t 4
• Kit
C 7 [a l~\y ')~'t fir! (tivfa frl~ti
. • t • 'O • C h 1 Q . } 1 I I L It
• 'C r tl: r . 7[^'rr- ✓'ti L f•R j iti;;{ \ : i., r~ `TC' \_3JMt 1 r'
I• C /1.-f /•y J J
Y _'f
Gam` r ' ✓rr . 4•t f:ti ~i.~ ~ti _ r r '
♦K:.' ~ -e ' .1-.,rte..-` •-~:.ov,, % .a
u \ v C $ mot' " - •r-.
'
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXEAREA, CITY OF DENTON TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
adopted by 'the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on.a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970& as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
Y, Basic Service Plan
A, Police
(1) Patrolling, radio respoiases to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established-by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel
el andequip-
will
of the fire fighting force,
ment
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereaf.er from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
. E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same re_gular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, instn.lla-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area,
on the effective date of annexation,
• H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
1. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc„ on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
Ii, 'Electric Distribution
• (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
0 L, Miscellaneous
street ithin aamroximatelye6emonthsdafter theiefteutivve
(1) w
date of annexation,
11, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The
datedlyearly. They Plansistprioritized byasuchapolicy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(s) Impact on overall city economics. con The annexed area wiwhichh williberno longerPthannonegyeartfrom
. upcoming CIP plan,
the date of annexation. In this new CIP Pltonthe same the
annexation area will be judged accordingly
established criteria as all other areas of the city,
HENRY S, MILLER 00, REA0ORS' 2001 BRYAN'TOA(A 001H FLOOR DALLAS 1EXA$ 152011 EL ell H a+F 2140,16.91 ?1
AOP'N OA'.LAS EL PASO FORT N'00N K0010N SAN AN'0'60 BRUSSELS 4RANKFURI TFLSY 73 M1
J. Mlkel Rsynolds 1984
Sams Vice PreeroeNi January 6 T
i
Mr. Charles Watkins
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Rei, Annexation of 300,941 Acres
Interstate 35-E at Mayhill Road
Dear Mr. Watkinsi
Enclosed please find an executed Petition for Annexation
for the property owned by HSM Inc., Trustee, located at the
northeast corner of 135-E and Mayhill Road. It is my under-
standing that the annexation of the properties located in the
general Mayhill Road area was to be voted on by the City
Council on January 3rd but was tabled until the January 17th
City Council Meeting,
In the event the City Council elects not to annex those
properties previously considered in the Mayhill Road annexation,
it is the desire of HSM Inc., Trustee that our 300.941-acre
tract be annexed into the City of Denton on an individual an-
nexation case on the January Planning Commission nning
case to be heard by by g &
January 25th.
Should you have any questions concerning this Petition for
Annexation please don't hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
Mike Reynolds
/emz
Enclosure
~ MC KINNRY
~"~ter
A
Q
'a
Q 4T~EtSCER tiV ROA
a
T~y5 .~o c OP
X9 Q 4 ~0
4",I<~ r0
r4ti°`~ SITE
sF
i
IMIX
acHno~
SCALE t"W2000'
VICINITY MAP
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS, CREATING A "DATA
PROCESSING ADVISORY HOARD" AND PROVhING FOR APPOINTHENT AND
NERBERSHIPI PROVIDING FOR POWERS AND DUTIES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
(a) There is hereby created a Data Processing Advisory
board to be composed of five (5) mnbers, appointed by the City
Council for a term of two (2) years, subject to the provisions
of subsection (b) of this ordinance. All members of the board
shall serve without compensation. Vacancies shall be filled for
any unexpired term in the same manner as provided for regular
appointments.
(b) Unless continued in existence by ordinance, the Data
Processing Advisory Boardyas appointed under the authority and
provisions of this ordinance is abolished effective January 19,
1986. Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prohibit
the City Council by ordinance from terminating the Data
Processing Advisory Board at a date earlier than that provided
in this ordinance.
(c) The City Manager or his designee shall be ex officio
members of the board. They shall attend meetings of the board
and shall have the right to' discuss any matter that is under
consideration by the board, but shall have no vote.
(d) Members of the board shall be residents of the City of
Denton.
(e) At its organizational meeting, and annually thereafter,
the board shall select a chairm-an from among its members. Any
three (3) of the appointed board members shall - nscitute a
quorum. The board shall determine its own rules and order of
business. The board shall meet as needed and all meetings shall
be open to the public and a written record of its proceedings
maintained. Such written record shall be approved by the board
and filed with the City Secretary's Office.
PAGE ONE
SECTION I7-
The Data Processing Advisory Hoard shall have the powers and
perform the duties assigned to it by the City Council.
SECTION III
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence,
clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof
to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of
competent jurisdiction, auoh holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it
would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such
invalidity.
SECTION IV,
That this ordinance shall become effective upon passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
PAGE TWO
CITY of DEMON, r1FXAS MUNICIPAL. BUILDING ! Lwwm, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) $668200
M E M 0 R A N 0 U J
f0; G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM; Rick Svehle, Assistant City Manager
DAM December '47, 1983
SUBJECT: Amendment to Code of Ordinances Sections 2132-35
Currently, these sections of the ordinance provide for
replacement of sidewalks witnin the city. By these sections of
the ordinance, the Council could require that the abutting
property owners pay for the total cost of removing and
replacing the sidewalks with the city being responsible for
grading. Staft has reviewed these requirements with the
requirements of six other cities. Of those six, four have
similar requirements, which require the property owner to pay
the entire cost, one splits toe cost with the property owners,
half and halt ana toe last one pays the total bill.
we nave reviewed costs and procedures contained in this
ordinance ana would like to recommend an amendment to the
ordinance. This amendment would allow for a contract to be
signed between the abutting property owner and the City of
Denton. In this contract, the city would agree to do all of
the removal, grading, and all of the labor associated with the
installation of replacement sidewalk, me land owner would
agree to pay tot the costs of the materials. This alternative
or amendment would allow tot two things.
1. It would be an incentive to land owners since cost of
materials would be cheaper than assuming the full cost of
replacement.
2. Secondly, it would remove ana eliminate much of the
paperwork that the Council and staff would have to do to
assess toe total cost, It would also allow the staff to
fit the replacement into the schedule in a much more timely
fasnion and allow toe work to be completed sooner.
Page Two
Amendment to Code of Ordinances Sections 2132-35
It the Council agrees with this pnilosopoy, this will improve
the ordinance, it tnere are proolems or questions or we can
provide more data, please let us Know,
Rick 5venia
Assistant Pity manager
1560M
G23L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE It OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF T14E CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ADDING A NEW DIVISION
3 SECTIONS 21.37, 21.38 AND 21-39 THERETO, RELATING TO REPAIR AND
RkPLACEMENT OF SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND GUTTERS BY AGREEMENT OF THE
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER tO PAY I
CRITERIA FOR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT FOR COST OF NATERIALSt PROVIDING
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTIO14 t.
That Article II of Chapter 21 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas, be and the same is hereby amended by adding
a new Division 3 thereto, consisting of Sections 21.37, 21-38 and
21-39 heretofore reserved, which shall hereafter read as fellows:
DIVISION 3. BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER
if
Section 21-37. City to bear all ocosts wners except tmaterials
a ter al s,
abutting property agree to rep&irs.
The Superintendent of Streets is hereby authorized to
repair or replace sidewalks and/or curbs and gutters that
meet the criteria of Section 21.38 hereof with the City
bearing the total cost of excavntion and removal and the
total cost of labor iu repairing and replacing such side-
walks, curbs and gutters if the abutting property owner or
owners prior to the oommenaemont of such work, pay to the
city the cost of materials for the proiect as determined
by the Superintendent of Streets or, in 1Letti thereof, sip
a promissory note and lten for the cost of such materials
before the City of Denton will commence the work. The
terms of the ppromissory note shall be no longer than
twenty-four (24) months, shall provide for twenty-four
(24) equal monthly payments and shall bear interest at the
rate of eighteen (189.) percent per annum.
Section 21-38. Criteria for sidewalk repair or replacement.
Criteria for sidewalk repair or replacement shall be as
follows:
(a) Sidewalk location must be in the City of Denton right-
of-way.
(b) A minimum of fifteen (15) linear feet per residence
must meet these repair or replacement criteria.
(c) Sections to ba roplaced must be shattered or cracked
or structually unsound, as defined in (e), (d) or (e)
below.
(d) Sections have h them two
or lf broken u w
more in diameter or that are cracked with
missing or loose pieces.
PAGE 1
(e) Sections that are upheaved or depressed, thereby
ceu ing an abrup thana in grade of forty percent
(40 ) or more two inoh vertical !n tan inches
horizontal) or creates an unsafe condition as
designated by the Superintendent of Streets,
(f) Sections having surface spelling only, will not be
considered criteria for replacement. These areas will
only be considered if the superintendent of Streets
determines they create an extremely unsafe condition,
Section 21-39, When procedure for replacement not appli-
cable or prohibited,
The provisions of this Division shall be 1!,mited to
replacement and repair of existing sidewalks abutting
residential areas; it shall not appl to new construction
or sidewalks abutting non-resident ial propperty. The pro-
cedures in this Division may not be utilized if the City
Council has, by resolution, ordered the construction or
repair of sidewalks,
SECTION II,
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately after
its date of passage and approval,
PASSED ANO APPROVED this the day of January, 1964,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEOAL FORM!
C, J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
,
BY:
PAGE 2
I
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
C.J. Taylor, Jr., City Attorney
Joe D. Morris, Assistant City, Attorney
Robert S. Hunter, Assistant City Attorney
TO.- CITY COUNCXL
FROM, C.J. Taylor, City Attorney
DATE; January 11, 1984
RE; Ordinance No. 83-132 Open Container Ordinance
Attached are the following instruments:
1) Copy of Opinion'No, JM-112 of the Attorney General of
Texas declaring that the City does not have the
authority to.pass an open container law,
.2) Ordinance repealing Ordinance 83-132Zt/a
. as
Y
City Att ney
cc, Richard Stewart, Mayor
Chris Hartung, City Manager
Hugh Lynch, Chief of Police
No.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCZ NO. 83.132 RELATING TO THE
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN MOTOR VEHICLES AND
DEC-.ARINO AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 83-1320 heretofore effective,
creates the offense of possessing an open container of an
alcoholic beverage in a motor vehicle and provides a penalty
for violation thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Attorney Oaneral of the State of Texse has
issued Opinion No. JM-112 concluding that a City or County is
prohibited from adopting a local ordinance banning the
possession of open containers of alcoholic beverages in motor
vehicles; now, therefore,
THE COUNCIL. Or THE CITY OF DENTON, 'T'EXAS, HER99Y ORDAINS
SECTION I.
That Ordinance No. 83-132 heretofore effective, is hereby
E
1 repealed.
SECTION II,
That this ordinance shall be effective immediately after
its date of passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day
of , 19 .
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, C Tr SECR fie'LFtT
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C.J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
10
c~tNL),
e ~itiX1►~~`
The Attorney Genera of Texas
JIM MATTOX December 30, 1983
Attorney General ti
$uProme Coup Bulldlnp Honorable !like Wsstergren Opinion No, JM•112
P,. 0, box i2646 Nueces County Attorney 1r .1
Austin. TX, ?V,1 I. a" Rom 206, Nuooes County Courthouse Rae Authority of a county or
61214762601 Corpus Chriati,.Texas 78401 city to promulgate ordinances
Telgx 91016741467
Teleoopler 612476-0266 banning open containers of
alcoholic beverages in motor
114 Jackson. Suitt 700 vehicles
Dallas, TX. 16202W4606
2141742.8"4 Dear MT. Westlrgrent'
You have requested our opinion as to whether a municipality or a
4624 Alberta Ava„ Sults 180 county may ban the possession of open containers 'of alcoholic
El Paso, TX. 19906.2793 beverages in motor vehicles through an ordinance adopted by the city
9161533'3484 council or .an order adopted by the commissioner* court, We conclude
that the preempti.on.provisions of the Texas Alcoholic beverage Code
toot Texas, tBuNe 700 preclude such an order or ordinance,
L. Houston, TX, 77002.3111
713J2236884 Section 1.06 of the code provides in full as follows 1
WO Broadway, su11e $12 Unlea: a otherwise specifically provided by the
Lubbock, TX, 7401.3479 tome of 'this code, the manufacture, sale,
H061741.6236 distribution, transportation, and possession of
alcoholic beverages shall be governed exclusively
4300 N. Tem1h, Suits B by the .provisions of this code.
McAllen, TX. 16301-1666 l
6121662.4647 We believe that .this preemption provision is very clear and simply
precludes a city or county from enacting a local ordinance banning the
404Maln Plate Su1a100 postession of alcohA2# beverages in automobiles.
San W0610, TX 782062707 `
4122264101 r ln• dour brief ypu assert, that a •city would have such authority
,.under, thoir..ganeral grant of power to Vass ordinances for the public
.health s# .%7elfare subject ,to thc;.constitutiona1 provision that
toyer r• rn Yd;)} 1, . - .1 r
40 Ematl 09P ltyi l
mo ,.charter, or, ,any .ordinances, -passed under said
charter shall contain •aay provision inconsistent
with the Constitution~:`of the Stste, or of the
general laws enacted by the Legislature of this
State;
'j Tex. Comt..art. 91, 45. See also V.T.C.S..art, 1165. With regard to
counties you propose that a commissioners court order banning open
,r
p. 470
• • 1
Honorable Mike Wastorgren - Page 2 (,IM-112)
coptliners would be authorized by provisions of the newly codified
"county road and bridge act," Acts 1983, 68th Leg,* ch, 288, at 1431,
to be codified as article 6702-1, section 2,301(, )(1) which provides
as followst
The eoms>aissionsrs court of any county may regulate
sad restrict traffic on county roads and on other
county-owned land undsr•Yts jurisdiction,
This section also requires s public 'hearing before the adoption of
traffic regulations and specifically authorizes the commissioners
court to adopt speed limits, load limits, and a system of traffic
controlled devices,
In the case of Royer v, Ritter, 531 S.W.2d 448, 444 (Tax, Civ,
App. - Beaumont 1975, writ ref n,r,s.), the court held that a local
ordinance passed by a city sod which regulated the hours of sale for
liquor package stores conflicted with the predecessor Liquor Control j
Act. The local ordinance prohibited the opening of a package store on
days and at times not prohibited by state law. The court recognized
five "distinct" areas of municipal regulatory authority oiler alcoholic
beveragest (1) the assessment for local fees, (2) prohibiting sales
in residential sections, (3) prohibiting sales near churches and
schools, (4) regulating 'the sale of beer within the city limits, (5)
adopting hours for the sale of mixed beverages. $ee Alcoholic
Beverage Code $111.38; 105,031 ;09.31 - .33. The court held that the
ordinance in question was unauthorized by the state liquor laws and
was inconsistent therewith. The court stated the followingi
The -Legislature, by granting to the cities
power of control in five instances above set
forth, has denied this power in any instance
not specified. There is no authority in the Taxes
Liquor Control Act for the Ordinance Amder-revlew.
ftrthernoits, -this Ordinance is 'inconsistent Q
rith the Act. it 46 true that, the Legislature,
c *ftta4, ahea
r . _ ~ ~ Vackage ltorea Matte ' not -to, 1►e Opln,
.satbar'#iaiit the *,oaverse,' Ut •thir f.q.'Serely me
' : • • ,;spy. elf • tiiitstifag •'i►Mca thep '!a1' be bprta. ''Mberi' •the . .
Beaumont Ordinance *dds to the tiods they s►u4t be
1 „closed, •-the Ordinance is 'inconsistent ' Kith' the
7 Zf 0r.o
If the Legislature had intended for the City
Council to have _the authority to extend the time
'of closing oor opening of package stores from the
1
p. 471
Honorable Mike Wootergrsn Page 3 (,TM-112)
state provision, it could have said so. Navin
failed to do so, we believe they {the Legislature)
intended the provision for closing in,•the act to
* be statewide and exclusive, (Emphasis in
original).
Ro er v. Ritter, ssu~upp,,rr~a at 449-50. Based on the Royer case, We
cone ide that the legislature has not authorized cities and counties
to adopt an open container ordinance,
SUMMARY
A city or county is prohibited from adopting a
local ordinance banning the possession of open
containers of alcoholic beverages in motor
vehicles.
V rye truly q
J I M M A T T 0 X
Attorney General of Texas
TOM GREEN
First Assistant Attorney General
DAVID R. RIM MS
Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by David Brooks
Assistant Attorney.General
APPROVED
OPINION COMITTEE
Rick Gilpin, Chairman
Jon Bible
David Brooks
Colic, Car]
Susan Garrison ur
Jim Moellinger
Nancy Sutton
472
CJTYo! omrom, rexAs muNICIPAL BUILDING i' DENrON, TEXAS 76201 TREPHONE (8r7) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM; Rick Gvehla, Assistant City Manager
DAIS: December 'L7, 083
5UBJEG,r: Resolution 'rhat Would Ailow County Commissioners to
do Work on ,SCreeCS Witnin the City of Denton
lkera's correapondenccee
Attached is a resolution
sh eo indicates iChat
gee Walker, In Ms.
in order for the county to do any work within toe city limits
they must have a resolution.
'he atCachea resolution covers ms. Walker's recinct, as well
as the pcecincCS of the
allow usrtu commisstoners. tassisCancer o~ any
correspondence, this will
street witnin Che city.
it you or the Council nave any t:urther questions, 1 will ue
happy to and answer them.
Kick bvehla
Assistant City manager
1559M '
gg Rasu Ugr10
AUTrRi0K141NGOCOUNTY CQMtll$``IONERSU Do WORKI ON RODS WITHINNIHE
CITY OF DENTON.
WHEREAS, there are within the City of Denton, certain
roach which are an Intesral part of the county road eySteml and
one or more County Commissioners of the County of Denton nave
expressed the desire to cooperate to specific instance$ in the
repair and maintenance of certain roads within the city which
are part of the county road system, and;
WHEREAS, for such County Commissioners to undertake
any road work upon roads within the city, the express consent
of the city is requirea;
bE IT RESOLVED 8Y TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of
DEMON, 'IEXASi
Section 11 'that the County Commissioners of precincts
1, 4, 3, ana 4 of the County of Denton are hereby expressly
autnori'zed to repair, construct, reconstruct and maintain roads
within their respective precincts which are within the City
limits of the City of Denton.
INIRODUC0, READ ANU PASSED by the aftirmation vote of
the City Council of the City of Denton, on this 17th day of
January, 1984,
MRARD u. nw K
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
,A'lIESl;
Cn R 0 1E A ,v, CF1Y E SLULIARY
DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
I
C. j i
tN Y
1 1 , 1 „
i
i
C1TYot ocmro , TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELaPNONE l8►J J 566 8200
MBriURANDUM
TO: 'Iaylor, Jr City Attorney
FROM: Rick Svenla, Assistant City Manager
DAZE: December 20, 1983
SUBJECT: Response to Lee Walker Letter
In cne enclosed from Lee igalker, sne indicates that in order
for ner to do any work witnin the cicy in Precinct 3, she trust
nave a resolution trom us giving ner permission to maintain the
roads in ner precinct ano within the city limits. Would -yoc
please drait an appropriate resolution for the Council to sign
which would covdr all k precincts, 1 have attached the
intormation trom Ms. Walker,
i you hav any other questions, please call,
Rick Sven
Assistant City Manager
H
R7 3, BOX 1766 1 , gRfCINCT 3 18171461,7 10
ROANOM TEXAS 76202
1, 71 RESIDENCE b9 sioo
LOO WALKER
PRECINCT 3
SIKIH MOOR, )OSIPH A. CARROII COURI S BVIIOIN01 /0,M$I HICKORY 4 OINI ON, It XAS 76201418171 1?I? „BIh OBY4111, MI IRO I,4 1115
M4. G. ChhiS Hahtull9, City Managn
215 E. McKinney s~
0entoll, Texas 16201
0eah Chhih I
•AS o'un. County ghowe, changes in tile opehation take pp-ace.
J11 the paot, a tot 06 tookh wah done in inujApohated city
tilnitb (0it11o41,t lV1ti•ttCl1 agheeniClltS, illbthl4Ct•i01tb oh Collthact,%
Si.11,ce J have been you,n ColltmiSSiomcA, J have t.hied to do at't
J cotltd bon the. cities, and beet that we have. a vent' good
uluhttirlg %etatiunShip,
W.,th the new 6i.6cat year, beginning, and because o6 ljudcc.t
col16thailit,5, 1 betieve some things need to be ctahi~iied, T31c
hoad and bridge, wo/Lk done within i.ncohpohated city £imit4 ac.
pheScrLibel by State Statutes.
Foh the puhpose 06 eta4Si6.icati.on, tile 60ttowing taw's
have been ahhanged by Subject ahem
J, Jocohpohated aneab' hesponzibi.tityl
A. Ahticte 1082, Vehnoll's Annotated C.ivit St.atuee
prlovidu ill pant: Cite Cuunci.~ :571
i.11ve.Sted with butt powch and authohi.ty to ghade,
gh.avet, hepaih, pare oh othehwi4se inlphove ally
avenue, Stheet oh attey, oh .arty poht,io}1 theheo6,
within .the.timits 06 said' city, whe.haveh, by a
vote o6 two-thi.nd,s u6 the atde4mert phe.sent, they
Itlatl dee.nl Such inlphoveme,ltS 60h the pubtic illte test;
phovidcd, the City Councit pay idle-tU., d and thc.
awneh5 06 the phopeh.tu -two-thihde the,7eoa, ncept
at the intehSecii.olt 06 stheet, 64om Zot to tot,
achaSS .the. stheet eitheh wai! Shah. be paid by the
city atone..."
S. 11ah Kenn Cauntl s, City u6 1,Sah.sfi, C, , 253 S.(N, 2d, G" G9.
"7'11e. illcohporiatio11 06 a city 1Q.11c iat' ll he?^ovo!~ rile ! f
06 the cc,n,n.iasiol;e,Is couh.t t0 tau ou.t a)-,d -7eguznto.
Aoads uitll.ill tho..t city':, huunda,tie.n H
M 1
r •
R1 3 SOX 17601
ROANOM TEXAS %6282 PRECINCTS (0171464,)410
,
RESIDENCE 430.8188
+ 430,1162
LEE WALKER
PRECINCT3
$1x1N it0QR. M(PII A CAkk0tk COVA16 bull D,N06A01 MST WCK011'6 Of N10N. 1(X0 76M1 .16171121?4 I01AaV 3411. MLTNOAIJ 1745
III Limi a-bons u6 county Toad W002 WWlirl city timitA.,'
A. C.i•ty oi( BAeche.nh.idge vsl S.teehclls' Cou)1,t(/, 40 S.W. 43.
R(tgilCS llb. Col(Ij.I! onlmCbsiolleAti ah~Cu(kilty,
35 S.W. M.
"County Road and 6A.idge 6uods may be eape.llded in the
impAOVemen.t 06 comity Aoad.s pa.ss.cllg .through a
city, though they be s.tAee.ts o6 such city, phov•ided
coliben-t .Cs ob.ta.ined 64om the city and suCil stitee-tA
aAe .Cn.tegAat pa,tts 06 tile c0ull.t1 AoadA, AtAee.ts
6aAm.ing a 'connecting L'.i,lh' on duty ez4(zhUsile.d
coa)ity Aoads may be .ilnpAoved by the county tv.i til tile
collsen-t o6 .tile (.Etyl"
6, W,Cttiams vs. CaAAot.C) 182 S.W. 29, "Tile couitt f(e.Cd
t1iaT a~ 6the.c.t genenatty mean/, a pah.&agel(1ary within
the bounds o6 a mun.ic.ipa.C coApoAa.t.ion, white a Aoad
means a coucl.ty, highway 6ohm.img a commun.ienz.iun
be.t(vecit the city timi.ts o6 ano.thn city oA .town; and
white a 6tiiee,t. .iz a h.i.ghw.y it .is no.t necessaA.ity
.tAue that a highway .is a At4ce.t."
IIII Con.thac.ts betoken mun~cipati-tics and .the county;
A. A,t.toAlley Genehat Opinion ko. w,wl 1401.
"We kilow 06 110 Aeasoll why tile mun.ic,ipa.City cannot
C(IlItAac.t to pay tile caun.ty* Just as may the courl.ty
COMthac.t to pay tile mttn.i.c.il)a.Citrl, 60A dU OA pah-t
o6 the coe.t o6 pav.iltg oh maintaining a ,s.tiiee.t
Witil.in ti1C etas 06 s-tAects that a eoun~y i,5 au:tila,t.Czed
to ma. nta.in. There .is no appa,en.t Aeason whi, the
Comnl.iSSs Oltchs couA.t's authoh.tty to coli.thac.t 6cA P(Zkt
payment does mot azso inci'ude tile au.thoA.i.ty .to con-
xhac.t 60A paymecl.t o6 the e11.t.i.Ac. cost, shou.Cd 411a•t
bC the comln.i/,s.io)1cLs cUUht'•s j(1dgll1Cl1.t,"
6. CanaCCS vs, Lauah£.in, 147 Tn. 169) 214 S.W. 45I,
ArnC'ciCalt vi. ,<~114cc Cnp Co. T}? F.hCCLtOne CC1ur1.iU,
?9eS,hl ~1ri0, "A 1'itcc.6lct' Colnretibs.ione2<<Eoes riot.
Tlai!e The nlt.t+'loh.ity to make ,tll ac~hCeulei;.t Ic~itf~ a11C
60'1 - hC CCU11tir to 1.1ave (!h H,a•il~.t.a.(li n
L-t;(ce,t.. OrIty .tF.c Coni mtiAS.iol~C.h'b co{titt has c1,a,-,10,
n6 .the bu,s.i.IICss a66a,iAS o6 he. county, altd it a.f'oIIC
ita,1 au.tilo,li.tu to make col1~ t1,et.s b.illd.inq upcn .the.
Comity,
r
RT, 3, 00X 170 1 PRECINCT 3 M17! 464.74!0
Rt+ANQ9E TCXAS 76262 RESIDENCE 430 8166
430.1162
• ~tiayf ~v~n
LEE WALKER
PREC114CT 3
SIX 111)tUURIJOSEPH A CAR RUt1000RISGUROIP910 01WESIHICKORYODINT014 IINA$)6201IbI/1012g401)1 ?10114tMtIR0434V41,
Ili, Bidding upon imbeic conbthic.tiunt
A. 8erlItctt vb,• 84 0 ulrt Cuu11t0 u1,c, 1P No I, 153 Tex 5990
;5`; cv-~ld~ 9 Ve tllvta+ 06'11() Phout kb.i.nrt 06
+ w ic1 au tohizeA a county to b. d upor the
t)ubtic conAthuctiotl u6 u tnulltic,tpaC•i.t~, 7n auh v.ieu,
t11iA pnolao.aat cannot be Aa -i.d tv be u)ithilt tIt e pelt-
6vnuiancc uk a govc"illmentat 6uilct.io,1 nems'w(y to
county buA.tne.•5 k. To t11e co)'tk0kY, the phapoAat'
Augge?.t,6 ellgag.61f irI -tile Woad corl,5tnuc.i4 . on bttbineas
• tin n p:upn.i.e.tahy c.apucity, trh.iclt .ib not nutltan.ize.d
by t'.aio. A Cou+l.ty call peh 6ohm onty govehrlutelttaC
6uIle, url,s . "
lr, County -'toad Monk echcduting and coAtb excluding mate;i,at.ar
A Texa., 'StatuteA, Aht, 23'x2 1 Equipment and enlptoyce•.
NA ccmmtibAionehA cour,.t u6 a cottnty nlay ttbe. 'i.tA
Load equipment, including VwckA, and empt.oyeaz
11CC l {ahy to otae~tate the egttilametlt .tv dAA.iAt
anotheh gvvcnnmentat entity'on any prtoje.ct so kong
aA the coAt does not exceed $3, 000, 001 .i6
( I j the use o'(, the egat pwciit oh employees does itc,
itlte46e4e with the evunty'A (uonlz bchedute; arse
{21 the counts{ doeb not pats anti cost), itctated to
the use 0~ t1:e equipment oA empL'oyeeA that
,he county wotttd 11o.t pay i6 the a.6AiAtaoce
tame )lot give11 to the others guvennmetl.tat
elttitit 11 E66ective 5-29-81,
7t1 ohdcA 6oh Pne.ciitc.t 03, Deil.torl County, to con,e.tAac,t
0)~ ma.i.n.tatin ncadA io yottr' rrtuni.c,i.1:'a.Nty accohd•iitg to -tile ahk,vc.
.Carr!, "stated, 7 mlDt have (1) a heAotutioll 6)tom each ei'ly
)
ccurcit Cr•6°•6t( me perri7.t.1A.Com tv.ttlt•lii .t.tA. Cittf ~iDLi•t', all(
(2j all uI?da.tt.d map v6 r!onh c•i.tt?, .5.(glled by .ihc C.itr/ SCC1iCy
aild bcaCed w",th yo (m ci.(y seaaP.So -S IL C:Wtng dour-c I'TJ,
The Dist.%.(.c.t. At.tC,.rtey1,~ o61,%cc I:hcACn•tty I?r,claa',in:,
C(Zc~ + i'C aI?J?tii'1'Cd by •tl;C (^Crl'u; ,',iClitt'li,l, ('OU1iti 60h r5
u1. (n 1'.,C,~I%.j u'.itft Cciti.CA, 'Jt'01 a.5 < i,S corQ~rtC;ed, I t'f
d orc to lwf~ .
I '
RT. 80X 4760 1 PRECINCT 3 1811111.7,10
ROANOKE, TEXAS 7042 0 r
{I~ 1 ' RESIDENCE gv.olo
~ 1 I\~ A90 4142
LEE WALKER
PRECINCT 3
$uaM f1U0k i )U$(PM A CAHHUU CVVRI$ BVI(UING * 101 W($1 HICKORY, D(N10N. I(XA$ 7001 4 18171 1117 o INAOBn311~ ~ A1(1H01Y( 00
1,z .thc 111ean.t.imc (Uhe11 rou walit .t11c County ,to woAh ti11 C) (tA
c.i.ty .t.~ m'itb, pZca3e ~e.t a 2110(u x.41 (t1Ai.Ung exac,tty what wo01,
you have .i)4 m.i)4d, alld WC Witt (11041, .t09e.01cA on tt, ~
I ftnow loc can co-o4d.i14a.te. ou4 e66oA-t's nod wo)(h .togc.thc'r.
be%.auec we have bon •the .tab.t two 1rreaA~. I 1,n,ow .tfl.'s may )10.t
be a3, convenient aA- in the pae.t, D(7.t .thCAC aA.e the Auto we
m u'..t U v e with,
I(, yoc( have ally quegl.tioIIA, 1,.1teaAC con.tac,t me at nay
PAc-otnc.t. 8ahn {S17) 464-7410, oA at the CaAhotz Coc(At4
Bu.it'.d.ing 434-1745 kio-tAV) oA (817) 387-3414,
Si.41CIA r1,
Lee Q1at.heA
I ,
I
«:a • F
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION SY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO SION AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED
USE OF FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND
REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974,
AS AM 11ED.
WHEREAS, the Cite of Denton, Texas, is concerned
with the development of viable urban
oommunitie,,i, including decent housing
a suitable living environment and
expanded economic opportunities; and
WHEREAS, the Citv of Denton, Texas, has a
special concern for persons of low and
moderate income; xnd
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Taxas, as an
entitlement City, has prepared, through
a citizen participation process, a
program for utilizing its first year
entitlement funds in the approximate
amount of $610,000; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing will have been held
in accordance with the law; anti
WHEREAS, the Act requires an application and
appropriate certification; .
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF 6ENTON, TEXAS;
SECTION 1.
That the City Council of Chu City of Denton, Texas, authorises
the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing
and Urban Development a grant application and appropriA.~.
assurances for entitlement funds under the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended.
SECTION 2.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, authorizes
the Director of Planning and Community Development to handle all
fiscal and administrative matters related to the application, the
Housing Assistance Plan and the assurances.
SECTION 3.
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and
after its passage.
PACE ONE
S CTI 4.
That the City Secretary is hereby authorized to furnish copies
of this Resolution to all interested parties.
PASSED & APPROVED this day of 1984,
RICHARD 0. STEWMTo KAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OFiDMTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
coryot offNTON, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, Tf XAS 76201 TELEPHONE (81; 15668200
b1 M U R A N D U M
G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: kick 5venla, Assistant city Manager
DATE: January 12, 1984
SUBJECT.. Bridge Replacement on Masch Branch Road
Attached are agreements from the Highway Department which would
facilitate replacement of two briuges on Masco Branch Road,
The agreements provide for the state to do all design and
construction work. me city would agree to relocate any
utilities, participate in '0% of tale cost, and provide
maintenance otter construction.
Currently, this section of road is not in use and cannot be put
back into use until the bridges ace renovated, Under this
agreement, the city's cost would be approximately $40,bOU.00,
We estimate the cost of repair or replacements to these two
bridges to be more than that amount, if the city Lunde.d the
repairs itself.
Staft recommends participation lo this agreement,
if you or the Council have any further questions, 1 will be
availabl t the meeting to try and answer them.
c 5ve a
Assistant City isianager
jd
1588M
1
nton
DCounty
Con3D►o1 , 9
Highway,A86b o
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINiENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OR REHAM ITAYION
OFF THE STATE SY$TEN
TN1S XREEHENT, oede this da of
l! , by and between the State oeP r"t t of way$ eA u c
artment".
itV art of Dent n#tirst Part, herei;#`ocaftqe "or
Yr'M";p'ortatioN,cP
ov#rnmoot, goverao
mod 0 e»uta agene or " y' w r o eits t, hereinafter Cal led the
'6overa~ehtal Agency actin Oy and through
and by virtue o1 the authorg ity shown on Exhibit a ate hereto an Mae a
part hereof.
iiiL SETH 04 "REASO the 6oveit nMenorlsdlCtioniatklaschfBraa bridge nch,Road attDrdy F r public
road ar street within
ickorv reek (Relief Channel) and
1MEREAS, under Title 230 United States Code as amended by the Surface
Transportation Assistance Act of 1078 and subsequent opf FederalFlleegislatio Br4
praram c entitled 3
and Public tTrand _FWA ansportation aCo"I ssloo and said bridge is includedsintth}is9hway
progr aot and
MOEAS, it is incumbent upon the Department to assure accomplishment
of this work
AQEEEd 11T
00110 THEREFORE, in consideratfon of the promise$ and of mutual covept
naots and agreeoents of the parties hereto to be by them and performed, as hereinafter set forth, it is agreed as followst
t. The governmental Agency hereby authorizes the Department ar its
contracted consultant and Department's contractor to enter on the site of
said bridge and adjacent right of way or relocation right of way to perform
surveys, Inspection, construction aid other purposes necessary to replace
or rehabilitate said bridge and approaches.
2. The governmental Agency proes to provide, at its expense, the
necessary adjustment of any and 4111 utilities and services, whether
publicly or privately owned, as may be necessary to permit the work ities will tlon ande type r ofnInstallationuInlaccordance wit hrequirementssofctheo taca-
Department.
6.83
daft
34 the Gover"Nnt Agency agrees to provide 20% pf the actual
coostntction ost of the bridge replacement or reh abi itation project
including #Jimlgary engineering and toostructioa ineerin9► or that
portloo not roIW4vrsable by the federal Highway Admi stettion, and agrees
to aC Wire► at its expense► any additional right of-way, if re4uiredt
forty taw days prior to the date scheduled for the contract letting the
Weraeental ~peacy agrees to pay to the State of Texas by check made
payable to Sta a treasurer Accouot of Trust Fund No. 92; an escrow amount
equal to 20% of the estimated cost of the project incUn preliminary
e69111eoring. If► after voceipt of bids► it is found that his amount is
insufficient to pay the Governmental Agency's obligation then the
8overomental Agency► upon request of the W o,twof, will forthwith
supplement tAis amount in such amount as requested by the Department.
is completed, the actual cost will be determined by the
Attar the projecta"i"
acNutmeat} based on its standard actounting procedures, and M of the
doll tos` or that portion not reimbursabie by the federal Highway
Administration, will be the amount due by the Governmwntal Agency. Any
excess over this amount previously paid will be reiob-orsed to the
~y Ae 66overamm ataAgency withine30 days uponereceiot oftawcertifiedid
statemeat.
4. if prior to receipt of the escrow payment the Governmental Agency
the State f~those eligibie expenses Gincuirredtwhich art ettributable'to
the project.
S. The Department will prepare or provide for the construction plans,
advertise for bids and let the construction contract, or otherwise provide
for the construction and will supervise the construction or reconstruction
as required b the plans. The cost of all services performed by the
Department wilt be borne by others* tt is mutually agreed that as the pro.
fact is developed to the construction stage, both parties shall approve the
atttaached hegretour markked "Exhibit there ono aAnd a nd made pa part u hereof,~s will be
6. In the event the terms of this agreement are in conflict with
the provisions of any other existing agreements and/or contracts between
the 6overnmeotal Agency and the Department, this agreement shall take
precedence over the other agreements and/or contracts.
74 Upon completion of the project. the Governmental Agency agrees to
tharge.~thorited by this
xrcep~tpfnrhttpie tand entfltrate of the pu~iieiwithoutfacility
a9
8. the Governmental Agency agrees to indemnity the Department against
any and all claims for damages to adjoining abutting or other property for
which the Dei with ory attributed o;thegprout ofo, oject; incident to or in
my "ner associated
D-5
S-a3
r •
be exeuti$yl"oypllktoFon he parties hereto haVe Caused those presents to
PARTY Of THE SECOND PART PARTY Of THE FIRST PART
Certified as being executed for the
purpose and effect of activating
City of Denton and/or carrying out the orders.
CO* 0 v Wean + ncy established policies, or work pr"r os
heretofore approved and authorized by
the State Highway and Public
Transportation Comission;
Sys
y7f to ss s ant n9 nee rec or
of I x640 ng Of f It 4 Executed and approved for State
Highway and Public Transportation
Corm ssion under authority of
c omission, Minute Order No. 786010
ATTESTS dated May 10, 1981
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL;
s r c ng Weer
TM*
e ng neer, g way s gn
Bridge nq Weer
-3- DOS
6.83
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY
» THIS 1$ TO CERTIFY that the Mlcrophntepraphs oppeorlnp an this Fllrn•Flla
flwfi" wllh CITYYCOU+NCIL AGENDA PACKET 01/17184 end
lndlns with CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET are
occurah and cantipleto roproduellons of the rocordl of fCoMpony and Oepl.y CITYOFF, MTON
CITY SECRETARY .o/ delivered In the regular cowle of
11ul1noss for pholoprophlnp,
h Is further certiflod that the mlcropholepraphlc processes were accomplished In
a rnennor end en Alas which noels with requ1roms"11 of the Nollono lureou of 11100dordo
hr permanent rnicropholoprop,rlc copy,
lnlcre • Roeord• Comp.>~p o
howl TtCnnoLCGY XT(
j AWM PL1C£ •
Arlington, Texas. 76010