The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-07-1984 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL February 7, 1964 Joint Work Session of the City of Denton City Council anti Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, February 7, 1984, at 5;30 p.m. in the W vil Defense Room of the Municipal building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m.' 1. Consider approval of initiation of annexation proceedings on the latest proposed mobile home developments, 2, Executive Session: A. Legal clatters Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec, '2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C, Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V,A.T,S, D. Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V,A.T. S, Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, February 7, 1984, at 7:00 p,m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building; at whicu ttie following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m, 1, Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by vie Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Stiff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid # 9I35A - Lease/purchase of equipment bid it 9224 refuse truck 2, Bid A 9222 - insecticides/nerbicides 3. Bid 0 9220 - Refuse couLainers City of Denton City Council Agenda February 7, 1984 `Page Two , 4, Bid !1 9227 - Four. cubic yard compactor 5. Bid 9228 - Wood pole treatment 6. Bid !1 9229,- Saw and valve operator 7. Bid 9232 - Three-wheel police vehicles 8. Bid !I 9233 - Refuse packer body 9. Bid !I 9235 - Turf fertilizer 10. Bid !l 9236 - Roof replace"nt 11, Bid !I 9241 - Fire boots and helmets 12. Purchase Order # 61590 to JS Equipment 13. Purchase Order !I 61938 to Texas Waste Management, Inc, for the use of the DFlandfill B. Plats and Replats; 1. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Bent Oak Addition, (The Planning and Zoning. Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the preliminary plat of t-n Bentwood Addition, (The Planning and ZoniL.g Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of the preliminary plat of lot block 1, Jones Addition. (The Planning a;.,d Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the final replat of the Mesquite Ridge Addition, (.The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Approval of the final replat of lots 1-1:, block. 1, Northridge Subdivision. (T-,e Planning and Zoning Commission recommen-Ws approval.) 6. Approval of the final replat of the west c-.e half of lot 3, block 11, of the Aie_x Robertson Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) C. Payments; 1. Consider -approval of Community Development Block Grant Project payment for work completed in the amount of 9,912,80. pity of Denton Ctty Council Agenda February 7, 1984 Page Three D. Contracts: 1, Co~:sider app roval of a contract (Purchase order it 6113) with ttte City of Farmers Branch for ttie use of the Camelot landfill. 2. Consider approval of a contract with Jerry Wright for planning and design services in connection with the Municipal Building renovation projects 3. Consider approval of a contract with Catherine Conrady for planning and design serva.ces in connection with the Municipal building renovation projects, 2, Public Hearings: A. J This is the petition of the First Church of Me Nazarene requesting a variance of Article 111, Section 4,09, subsection (A), of the Denton Subdivision Regulations and Land Development Code, The petitioners are seeking plat approval and a building permit for the construction of a church, and the above provision requires the extension of water and sewer mains across the full width of the development lot in such an alignment that it can be extended to the next property in accordance with the master water and sewer plans of the city. The subject property is a 2,1138 acre triangular shaped parcel located adjacent and south of Hercules Lane, adjacent Hnd west of Sherman Drive (FM 428), and adjacent and east of lots 1-5, block 18, Royal Acres Addition, Section 5. (The Planninj~ and Zoning Commission recommends denial,) B. Z-1624. This, is the petition of Ana Rocco Pona requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification on a 14,034 acre parcel located along the east side of Riney Road, adjacent and south of U. S. Highway 77, and north of Windsor Drive at a point beginning approximately 220 feet east of Riney and Windsor. . If approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the construction of single family detached housing (15 lots witk a .typical size of 80' x 110') along Riney R,,-ad, single family attached (townhouses - 56 units), and duplexes (13 lots or 26 total units). (TIYe Planning and Zoning Commission recommel:ids approvei. ) ,City of Denton City Council Agenda February 7, 1984 Page Four 1. Adoption of an ordinance approvin a change in zoning from agricultural (A~ to the planned development (PD) classification on a 14.0734 acre parcel located along the east side of Riney Poad, adjacent and south of U. S. Highway 77, and north of Windsor Drive. C. Z-1626. This is the petition of Joe Belew requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification on a 127..5 acre tract located between Windsor Drive, North Locust and Hercules Street. Thy proposed residential uses begin at the northeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust with approximately 1,100 feet of frontage along the north side of Windsor Drive, approximately 3,500 feet of frontage along the east side of North Locust, and approximately 1,400 feet of frontage along the south side of Hercules Street. A proposed 4.14 acre neigh- borhood service section begins at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust. If approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the following specific land uses: (1) Neighborhood services on 4.14 acres located at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust (2) Multi-family beginning at the northeast corner of Windsor and North Locust (22 units per acre on 16.1 acres) (3) Duplexes/fourplexes along Windsor Drive (12 units per acre on 24.9 acres) (4) Single family attached garden homes (10 units per acre on 9 acres) (5) Single family detached on 60 acres beginning at the southeast corner of Hercules and North Locust (minimum lot size 7,000. square feet) (6) Floodway/open space on 10 acres between the proposed single family detached and single family' attached garden homes. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance approvin a change in zoning from agricultural (A~ to the planned development (PD) classification on a 127.25 acre tract located between Windsor Drive, North Locust and Hercules Street and a 4.14 acre tract located at the south east corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust. City of Denton City Council Agenda hbruary 7, 1964 Page Five D. Z-1627. This is the petition of ?tike Neblett requestin a ctiauge in zoning from single family NF-7) to the two family (2-F) classification on a proposed 80'x143,5' parcel beginning' adjacent and east of Bradley street approximately 150 feet north of the i,uterseetion of Bradley and Scripture Streets, and adjacent and north of 1922 Scripture Street, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from single famil (SF-7) to the two family (2 4F classification oil. a proposed 80'x143,5 parcel beginning adjacent and east of Bradley Street approximately 150 feet (10 'U.' of the intersection of Bradley and Scripture Streets, F, Z-1628, This is the petition of George of pk irs and Carroll Goen requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the single family (SF-16) classification on a 14.619 acre parcel beginning approximately 160 feet north of Hopkins Drive, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an, ordinance approvinchange in zoning from agricultural (Al ) to the single family (SF-16) classification on a 14,619 acre parcel beginning approximately 160 feet north of Hopkins Drive. F. Z-1636. This is the petition of handy Axtell requesting a change in zoning from office (0) to the planned development (PD) classification at 1100 North Locust Street. if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the establishment of a framing, gallery and art supply establishment (Art Alley). (Tile P1aanning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a ctiange in zoning from office (0) to the planned development (YD) classification at 1100 North Locust Street, if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the establishment of a framing, gallery and art supply establishment (Art Alley). City of Denton City Council. Agenda February 7, 1984 Page Six 3. Ord inanc ~ ; A. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Section 4-7 of the Animal Control Ordinance. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance expanding the membership of the Utility Account Review Committee. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 1014,4 acres of land located south of Highway 380 and west of 1-35. ('L-1610) (Tne, Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance avid service plan annexing approximately 43.9 acres of land located west of I-35W and south of the existing city limit line. (Z-1611) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) E. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 367 acres of land located between 1-35W and the Santa Fe Railroad. (L-1612) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plaii annexing approximately 1,125 acres of and located on both sides of Mayhill Road north of 1-35. (Z-1613) (Tne Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Resolutions; A. Consider approval of a resolution urging the Texas State Legislation to adopt a state-wide open container law. B, Consider approval of a resolution in support of Flow Memorial Hospital. 5. Consider approval of a contract (Bid # 9234) to acquire microcomputers for the Utility Department, the Public WorRs Department, the Data Processing Department, and the Accounting and Purchasing Divisions of toe Finance Department. (Ttie Data Processing Aovisory Board recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council A86ndo ' ,Vobruary 7, 1984 Page Seven b, Consioer approval of a lease agreement for rental of office space in the Airport Terminal Building, 7. Consider approval of final payment for the Police Building Renovation Project, 8. Official Action on Executive Session Items; A. Legal Mutters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 9. New Business; This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas, CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at tree City Hall of the City bf Denton., Texas, on the day of 1984 at 0 clock (a.m. ) ) CITY SECRETARY 12180 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL February 7, 1984 Joint Work Session of the City of Denton City Council and Plannippngch and Zoning Commission on 'T'uesday, February 7, 1984, at i ms twill oe consideredunicipal Building 3 . tliel fothe llows ngl e at wwhi 5,30 P.M. 10 Consider approval of initiation of annexation proceedings on the latent proposed mobile home developments. 2. Executive Session A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.s. B, Keel Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-11 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Dentoo City Council on Tuesday, F'obruary 7, 1984, at I WO .m. in the Council Chambers of the Municir)al Building at WA c' the following items will oe considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agendas Eactt of tt►ese items is recommended by t'hu Staff and approval tliereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda auLhorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid 0 9135A - Leash/purchase truequipment 9224 rfuge 2. Bid # 9222 - Iuseceicides/nerbici.des 3. Bid # 9226 - Refuse containers City of Denton City Council Agenda February 7, 1984 Page Two 4. Bid # 9227 - Four cubic yard compactor 5. Bid (1 9228 - Wood pole treatment 6, Bid A 9229 - Saw and valve operator 7. Bid # 9232 - Three-wheel police vehicles 8. Bid # 9233 - Refuse packer body 9. Bid # 9235 - Turf fertilizer 10. Bid # 9236 - Roof replacement 11. Bid # 9241 - Fire boots and helmets 12. Purchase Order # 61590 to JS Equipment 13. Purchase Order # 61938 to Texas Waste Management, Inc, for the use of the DFW landfill B. Plats and Replats: 1. A roval of the preliminary plat of the Bent Oak Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2, Approval of the preliminary plat of the Bentwood Addition. (The Planning and Loring Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of the preliminary plat of lot 1, block 1, Jones Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the final replat of the Mesquite Ridge Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Approval of the final replat of lots 1-11, block 1, Northridge Subdivision, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Approval of the final replat of the west one half of lot 3, block 11, of the Alex Robertson Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Payments; 1. Consider approval of Community Development Block Grant Project pa vent for work completed in the amount of 9,912.80. City of Denton City Council. Agenda February 7, 1984 Page Three D. Coutracts; 1. Consider approval of a contract (Purchase Order # 61.813) with the City of Farmers Branch for the use of the Camelot landfill. 2. Consider approval of a contract with Jerry Wright for planning and design services in connection with the Municipal Building renovation projects. 3. Consider approval of a contract with Catherine Conrady for planning and design services in connection with tho Municipal building renovation projects, 2. Public Hearings; A. V-2. This is the petition of the First Church of VYb Nazarene requesting s variance of Article III, Section 4.09, subsection (A), of the Denton Subdivision Regulations arid Land 'Development Code. The petitioners are seeking plat approval and a building permit for the construction of a Church, and the above prgvisiou requires the extension of water and sewer mains across the full width of the development lot in such an alignment that it can be extended to the next propert in accordance with ttie master water and sewer plans of the city. The subject property is a 2.1138 acre triangular shaped parcel located adjacent and south of Hercules Lane, adjacent and west of Sherman Drive (FM 428), and adjacent and east of lots 1-5, block 18, Royal Acres Addition, section 5. (Ttne Planning and Zoning CUmnliSSion recommends doniai.) B, Z-1624. This is the petition Ana Rocco Pena requesting a mange in zoninf, )rom agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification oil a 14,0734 acre parcel located along the east side of Riney Road, adjacent and south of U. S, Highway 77, and north of Windsor Drive at a point beginning approximately 220 feet east of Riney and Windsor. If approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the construction of single family detached housing (15 lots with a typical size of 80' r, 110') along Riney Road, single family attached (townhouses - 56 units), and duplexes (13 lots or 26 total units), ('T'he Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda February 7, 1984 Page Four 1, Adoption of an ordinance approvin a change in zoning fromm agricultural (A) to the planned developtent (PD) classification on a 14,0734 acre parcel located along the east side of Riney Road, adjacent and south of U. S, Highway 77, and north of Windsor Drive. C. Z-16260 This is the petition of Joe belew requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification on a 127.25 acre tract located between Windsor Drive, North Locust and Hercules Street, The proposed residential uses begin at the northeast corner of Windsor Drive and North along Locust twit he approximately side 1,700 Eee of or f rDrive, approximately 3,500 feet of frontage along the east side of North Locust, and approximately 1,400 feet of frontafle along tile 14so acre th s neigh- Hercules Street, A proposed borhood e of service section begins at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust. if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the following specific land uses: (1) Neighborhood services on 4.14 acres located at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust (2) Multi-family beginning at the northeast corner of Windsor And North Locust (22 units per acre on 16.1 acres) (3) Duplexes/fourplexes along Windsor Drive (12 units per acre on 24,9 acres) (4) Single family attached garden homes (10 units per acre on 9 acres) (5) Single family detached on 60 acres beginning at the southeast corner of Hercules and North Locust (minimum lot size 7,000 square feet) ingthe le (6) prooposed si gle afamily l~etaacres ched between family attached garden homes. (Tile Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance approvin a change in zoning from agricultural (A5 to the planned development (PD) classification on a 127.25 acre :rac:t located between Windsor Drive, North Locust and Hercules Street and a 4.14 acre tract located at the south east corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust. City of Denton City Council Agenda February 7, 1984 Page Five D, Z-16270 'Mi,s is the petition of ?tike Noblett requestin a change in zoning from single family NF-7) to Ilia two family (2-F) classification on a proposed 80'x143.,5 parcel beginning adjacent and east of Bradley Street approximately 150 feet north of the intersection of Bradley and Scri turn Streets, and adjacent and north of 122 Scripture Street, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 1. Adoption of an Ordinance ap roving a change in zoning from single Tamil (SF'-7) to the two family (2-F~ classification on a proposed 80x143.5 parcel beginning adjacent and cast of Bradley Street approximately 150 feet norto of the intersection of Bradley and Scripture Streets, F. Z-1628. This is the petition of George Hopkins and Carroll Goen requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the single family (SF-16) classification on a 14.619 acre parcel beginning approximately 160 feet north of Hopkins Drive, (The Planning and "Zoning Commission reco=ernds approval,) 1, Adoption of an ordinance approviu a change in zouitcg from agricultural (A to the single family (SF-16) classification on a 14,619 acre parcel beginning approximately 160 feet north of Hopkins Drive. F. Z-1636, This is the petition of Randy Axtell requesting a change in zoning from office (0) to the planned development (PD) classification at 1100 North Locust Street. if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the establishment of a framing, gallery and art supply establishment. (Art Alley). ('l'ire Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of au ordinance approving a change i.n zoning front office (0) to the planned development (PD) classification at 1100 North Locust Street, if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the establishment of a framing, gallery and art supply establishment (Art Alley). City of Denton City Council Aganda February 7, 1984 Page Six 3, Ordinances; A, Consider adoptioni of an ordinance amending Section 4-7 of the Animal CooLrol Ordinance, B. Guasider adopption of an ordinance expanding the membership of the Utility Account Review Committee, C, Consider adoption of do ordinance and service plan rnnexing appproximately 1014,4 acres of land located souks of Highway 380 and west of I-35. (Z-1610) (Tlie Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) D. Consider adoption of ua ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 43.9 acres of laud located west- of 1-35W and south of the existing city limit line. ('Z-1611) (The Planning and `Zoning Commission recommends approval.) E. Consider adoption of au ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 367 acre, of land located between I-35W and the 6anta Fe Railroad. (Z-1612) (The Planning and Zonin,, Commission recommends approval,) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service laic annexing approximately 10125 acres of and located on both sides of Mayhill Road north of I-35. (Z-1613) ('rhe Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4, Resolutions; A. Consider approval of a reaolution urging the Texas State Legislation to adopt a state-wide open container 'law. B, Consider approval of a resolution in uuppurt of x'luw Memorial HosYitai. 5. Consider approval of a contract (Bid 1) 9234) to acquire microcomputers for Like Utility Department, the Public Works DepartmenL, Lao Data Processing Department, and the Accounting and Purchariing Divisions of the Finance Department. (rlie Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval..) City of Deutou City Council Agenda FuUruary 7, 1984 Page seven b. Consider approval of a lease agreement for rental of office space in the Airport Terminal Building. 7. Consid.,)r approval of final payment for the Police Building Renovation Project. 8. official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Platters B. Reap. Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 9. New Business; Tois item provides a section for Council Mombers to suggest items for future agendas, CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulleti►t hoard at We City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on ttze day of 1984 tit OIclocK (a.m.) (p.in.) CITY SECRETARY 12180 CITY OFDFNTON MPMORANDUM DATE: February 1, 1084 TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Charles Watkins, Senior Plnnner Sf1BJFC'r: CONSIDFP INITIATION OF ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ON THE LATFST PROPOSED MOBILE HOME DE?ULOPMFNTS The Planning and Community Development Department staff has been appro.ched fly three developers seeking to develop east and southeast of the City as follows: 1. Mob I I c home park on approximately 60 acres on the south side of Page Road and north of S1iady ,Shores Road adjacent to the Shiloh Cemetary, 2, Mobile home subdivision on the east side of Swisher Road and on the north side of "Greentree 1?sfates," The subdivision would consist of. 45 lots with a typical lot size of 7,700 square feet on 10 acres. 3. Mobile home park on 30 to 5O acres of a 285 acre tract located in the Grissome Road and Mills Road area. The balance of the 285 acre tract, is planned for large lot (1 acre or more) site built housing. In response to the scale, the number, and the character of the proposed development, a review of policy options follows: GROWTH MANACFMrNT OPTIONS 1, LEGISLATIVE, (STATE): State Legislation to allow cities to regulate land use in the extraterritorial jurisdiction is a long term solution to rapid growth just outside the boundaries of a city, but it would be of no immediate help in dealing with our current situation. Chr i s Hartung February 1, 1984 Page Two 2. DO NOTIIING: This option may be of short range benefit to the City in that the population which would 1eCate in the oast and southeast areas just outside the City would generate additional retail sales; but, in the long term, doing nothing would be a problem so far as inadequate infrastructure and buildings in this area, 3, ENCOURAGE COUNTY TO UPGRADE SUBDIVISION STANDARDS: This option would require a considerable length of time for the county to upgrade their Aubdivision standards if they were of a mind to do so, and would be. of no immediate lielp in dealing with the current situation. 4, ANN1iXATION: Piecemeal annexation of areas proposed for development can be accomplished 1>y running 500 foot wide strips to each of the properties, This option would make for an irregular boundary but has the advantage of excluding sparsely populated territory not proposed for development with the exception of the 500 foot wide strips, The disadvantage of annexing on a piecemeal basis is that additional development may be proposed in areas not annexed thereby necessitating additional annexation, The staff could explore the feasibility of conducting major annexations into this area along logical boundaries. The advantage of conducting large annexation is that the City could have land use control over large areas in this section of the City, which Is subject to rapid growth, and can thereby ensure quality infrastructure and can also ensure conformity with the City's land us., plan. The disadvantage of annexation is that the City would have to provide services to the newly annexed territory. 5. APPLY CITY SUBDIVISION STANDARDS TO EXTRATERRITORIAL, JURISDICTION: This option could be implemented immediately and all development in the City of Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction would have to comply to the subdivision standards which are currently intended for development inside the city limits. This would mean that development proposed in the extraterritorial jurisdiction would have t7 comply with the City of Denton's street paving requirements, with the perimeter street paving requirement, and all other requirements of the subdivision regulations which are now enforced only for development inside the city limits. This option would increase development cost in the extraterritorial jurisdiction but would have the advantage of discouraging substandard development. This alternative could he used in conjunction 0 th annexation, Chris Hartung February 1, 1964 Page Three 6, MEAL OVEJiSIZE PARTICIPATION FOR UTILITY EXTENSIONS, OUTSIDE? 'rilB CTTY LIMITS UR BASED ON LENGTH OF RXTENSION; This alternative would Increase the development cost outsido the city limits or in areas which are a great length from oxisting lines, This Policy could also have the effect of encouraging growth inside the city limits rather than outside the city limits, The Planning and Community Development Department recommends immediate application of the City subdivision standards for the extraterritorial jurisdiction along with exploring the feasibility of conducting a major annexation to the east and southeast of the City of Denton. r' &nr es a ns j it 0146j CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA SACK-U? SUt4WY MET DATE OF MEETINGI February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent agenda SUBJECT; Bid # 9135A Lease/Purchase of equipment Bid # 9224 Roll-off Refuse Truck SU 41ARY; The city council, at the meeting of January 17, 1984, approved bid 9224 for the purchase of a roll-off refuse truck. The source of funds, $73,346.00, was to be a lease purchase arrangement to be presented to council at u later date, We have researched the possible options and the best is to add this truck to bid number 9135. Mercantile Bank of Dallas is willing to accept the addition at the rate approved in April, 1983, on bid 91351 The $73,346,00 principal will be financed at a fixed rate of 8,72% for 18 months. The monthly payments will be $4,361,84 per month, total payout of $78,246.67 which i.n,:ludeg finance charges of $4,900.67. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDS; Budgeted funds for replacement of Motor pool vehicles account 720-3002. RECOPIIENDATION; We recommend this be approved and the truck purchased on bid 9224 be added to bid 9135 for financing. EXHIBITS None, SUBMITTED BY; •~~Q . Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M. Assistant Purchasing Agent J' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE 3F MEETINGi February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 11 Consent agenda SUBJECTr Bid 11 9222 Insecticides/Herbicides SUMMARYi This bid is for the purchase of the annual supply of insecticides and herbicides used by the Parks and Recreation Department for parasite and weed control and for use by the Street Department for weed control in drainage areas, The quantities are estimated and may vary, ACTION REQUIREDi Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDSi 1983-84 Budget funds account 100-003-0064-8105 Parka and Recreation chemical supplies and 100-002-0032-8306 Street Department maintenance of drainage. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarde,' :o the lowest bidder as follows; Bid Item 111 Agriculture Chemicals Bid Item #2, 3, 4, 5, 12 Van Waters & Rogers Bid Item #6, 7, 8, 10, 11 Van Waters & Rogers Bid Item 119 Lake Shore Equipment EXHIBITS; 'tabulation sheet. SUBMITTED BY. L.A,b, Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M, Assistant Purchasing Agent HID N 9222 DID. Insecticides/Herbicides OPEN 1/5/84 Vnn-Waters Chemical akeshore H & 1, Agriculture Ptibl.ic 6 Rogers Turf Rquip, Co. Supply Chemicals Health Spec:lnlit ACCOUNT N 100-003-0064-8105 DVS Ckrfff i~_ _ 95--F- -7RRD~J-_ )dT- >U M, bw vcNdIiO -Vf 1 tan. Dormant 011 24,25 25,80 _ 32.50 - 19.50 25,00 2. 12/gal Dursban _ 30,26/gl. 32,94 35,05 60,25 ^35,95 34,75 3, 100#'s Dinzion 211 .44/1b, .63 ,715 .76 4. 1000s 0iazion 146 1.02/lb 1.22 1.28 1.26 1..60 1.95 Y` S. 1 es Orthene 6.79 6.93 7.8625 11.10 8,95 - 6, 20/g.l Rodeo 87.70 89.90 _ - 90.00 7. 90/gl Roundup 65,15 72.30 75.00 - 78.00 - 88.00 8. 12/ea. Oust 5.86 6.49 6,46 _ 9. 5/gl. Trimec 16.69 16,94 16,20 26.20 T 10. 25/lb Surflan .10.08 10.40 10.14 ~ v Y-W - - l l , 50/16 Antrex 1.85 2.09 _ ~__y__ _ 12, 12 I1ri.Snr.b W 9.22 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SKEET DATE OF MEETINGi February 7, 1984 COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM 11 Consent Agenda SUBJEM Bid # 9226 Refuse Containers SUPSMA3lYt This bid io for the purchase of eighty (80) 3 cubic yard refuse containers. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDS; 1983-84 Budget account number 630-002-0802-91.41 Solid Waste Commercial fixed assets, RECOMMEDNATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications of EMCO, Inc. at $229,50 per container, We also recommend we take advantage of the option to paint the containers dark green for $8.00 and to supply dark green lids for $7,00. The two options bring the total cost to $244,50 per container. Total for all containers is $19,560.00, ,EMCO, Inc. has also offered to sell additional (lark green plastic lids for $9.67 per lid if purchased along with the eighty (80) containers and lids. We recommend that we purchase 100 spare lids at this time and put them in Warehouse stock for future use, EXHIBITS, Tabulation sheet, - SUBMITTED BY-. Toro D, Shaw, C,P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent 010 N 226 820 Refuse FSSI Scott & Bnaic FMCO,Inc. Duncan Y.D.S. OPFN,,1 19 84 - 11411 Waste Fquip, Co. ACCOUNT - 278,00 230-,00--- 80 3 cubic Yard containers & lids N/B 2-84.00 261,00 229,50 .50 N/C~ N/A + 8.00 230,00 ~--Y--, - 2. Paint Dark Green N/A - N/A + 7.00 N/B 3. Lid Dnrk CreenW _ - - - 8.90 N/A 192.32 - - 5.00 4. primed only Metal Lid Metal Lid Metal. Lid ,1, 40 41' CITY COO CIL AGENDA BACKUP SUMMARY SHUT DATE OF MEETINGi February 7, 1984 COUNCIL, AGENDA ITEM Consent Agenda SUBJE M Sid # 9227 4 Cubic Yard Compactor SUMMkM This bid is for the purchase of one 4 cubic yard compactor for the Solid Waste Department. This compactor will re- place the 2.3 cubic yard compactor at thu Peterbilt Plant as per their request. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDS: This compactor will be funded from 1983-84 budget account 630-002-0802-9104, Solid Waste Commercial equipment. The cost of this unit will be spread over a 60 month period and added into the Solid Waste service cost to Peterbilt. RECOMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid meeting specification of Industrial Disposal Supply in the amount of $7,489,009 delivery in 10-21 days, FOB Denton. The bid of Duncan equipment failed to meet the compaction requirements, is approximately 1,000 lbs, lighter, uses a Vane pump instead of a gear pump, has a much lighter breaker bar, is not W.E.M.I, or N.S.W.M.A. rated or approved, have only been on the market a short period of time and only have three in operation. We feel like the E-7, Pak unit offered by I.D.S. Is the best buy for the City of Denton and Peterbilt. EXHIBITSI Tsbulation,eheet. SUBMITTED BY: Toot D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent DID N 9227 _ - BID 4 Cubic Yard Compactor 1,SSI Duncan ACCOUNT :quip, -Vff o~. .WE5R. -V~G~- r QT . _ i tJ .s fofii 1 Tl _ 4 Cubic yard compactor/with hopper 9,061,25 5,989,00 71489.00 x _ J Delivery 60 days' 30 dnys 10-21 days ~Sfg. _ Accurate _ Duncan- C,-7, Pak CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: February 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Bid # 9228 Treatment of Utility Poles SUBJECT; This bid is for the ground line inspection and treatment of wood utility poles for the electrical distribution system. This service is intended to extend the life of existing good poles and to identify unsafe or damaged poles that could lead to r;arvice interruptions or unsafe climbing conditions. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget account 610-008-0252•-8338-E355 maintenance of overhead electric distribution system. The bids are based on a per pole price and also the type of treatment necessary. RECO14HENDATION: Wei recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications of Central Utility Services in a total amount not to exceed $25,000.00. EXHIBITS: Tabulation sheet, SUBMITTED BY : kY .•._k_.\~:,4 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent Olt) 1 9228 BID Treatment of Utility Poles _ OPEN 1/19/84 smor•e central Utility ACCOUNT N QT . T -D89CWf IOff- DOR 0 -VJ DOR ^ R, D ft VENDOR VPN50R _V-F,-RbOR 1, 2500 Poles - treated 11.83 11.00 2. 500 Poles - treated-rejected 11.83 9.20 3. 300 Poles - rejected 10.21 9.20 4. 250 Poles - reported .80 .75 5. 200 Poles Sound & Bore 2.51 2.75 6. 150 Poles - Fumigant treatment 6.23 5.50 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA /`7CQ BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETINGi February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 11 Consent Agenda SUBJECT; Bid 0 9229 Hydraulic Saw and Valve Operator SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a hydraulic pipe saw and a hydraulic valve operator for use by the Water S Waste Water Field Services, We sent this bid to several pros- pective vendors and received only two bids. The bids are for the identical items one from the manufacturer, E. W. Wachs Company and one from their distributor, Tools Unlimited, ACTION REQUIRED. Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDS; Budget account 620-008-0461-9106. RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to Tools Unlimited for the total of $14,082.30. EXHIBITS; Tabulation sheet, SUBMITTED BY t ' Bohn J. Marshall, C,P,M, Purchasing Agent DID 1__9229 BID Saw & Valve Operator OPEN 1/19/84 Bowles & Toole Trans-Tex E,W, WECRAC Eden Unlimited Wachs ACCOUNT ~ 620-008-0461-9106 m E EsCRI '10 E ao - ~noh__ v o -VWn EN56 t y DOR - vS7D1U0R_.___ 1 1 Guillotine pipe saw NIB 61549.00 NIB 6,549.00 NIB 2 1 Valve operator NIB 7,533.30 NIB 7,533.30 NIB Delivery 90 days 90 days CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMdARY SHEET DATE OF MEETINCs February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITDi 11 Consent Agenda SUBJECTi Bid # 9232 Three Wheel Police Vehicle SUMMARY1 This bid is for the purchase of two (2) three wheel Police vehicles to replace unit 56 and unit 57. ACTION REQUIREDf Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDSi This purchase order will be funded by motor pool replacement funds and police department 1983-84 budget funds. Motor Pool Account 11 710-004-0020-8707 $100238.00 Police Department 11 100-007-0043.9104 $ 2,948.00 TOTAL $13,186.00 RECONL1MENDATION. We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder of Watson Distributing in the amount of $6,593.00 each in 30 days, FOB Denton. Vehicles of this type are currently only manufactured by 0. M. C. Cushman, Inc. and marketed in the Southwest by Watson Distributing Company. EXHIBITS; Tabulation s eet. SUBMITTED BY: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent BID 19232 T BI[?Aree Wheel Police Vehicle OPEN Pargo Watson ACCOUNT Distributi g QT T S I 0 D R V b0R bOR DOIt ~ VEtNDO _ 1 2 Three Wheel. Police Vehicle N/s 6,593,00 Delivery 30 days Terms Net FOR Benton CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SACK»UY SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: February 71 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 1i Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid r1 9233 Refuse Packer Body SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a replacement 30 cubic yard packer body to be mounted on an existing 1979 Insernatioual cab/chassis, The round barrel packer on unit 2030 is worn to the point it is no longer operable, The truck appears to be in good running order and is satisfactory condition to handle a new packer body, The bid includes the installation of the body and controls on our truck, It is our intention for the truck cab/ chassis to be painted and all mechanical items to be inspected and replaced as ,necessary, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE. OF MDS: The remount will be paid for from motor pool funds since it will extend the life of unit 2030. Account number 720.004-0020-8707. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to EMCO, Inc, in the amount of $21,610.00 with delivery in 15 days, EMCO is the manufacturer of the existing body on 2030 as well as all of the other round barrell packers in our fleet, EXHIBITS; abulatio~ ~heet. SUBMITTED BY: Tam D, Shaw, C.P,M. Assistant Purchasing Agent j DID` 1 9233 _ SID Refusa Parker Body OPEN 84 EMC0$lnc Pak-Mot Essl I.D.S. ACCOUNT N $x, zTS SC IPT~ON,- OR E o v VE3D +-VR-DOl2- --V-F,N5-O '-VMUO-T-' VVMDOR 1 1 30 cubic yard refuse packer body 21,610.00 NIB NIB NIB CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETINGi February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITI*'H # Consent Agenda SUBJECTi Bid 11 9235 Turf Fertilizer SUMMARY= This bid is for'the fertilizer 15-5-10 Sulphur coated slow release, for use on the parks and lawns of the City. This bid was sent directly to fine local vendors and only one bid was received. This is the same price that was the low bid last year from Harpool Seed and Fertilizer. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDSi Budget account 100-003-0064-8105. RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to Harpool Seed and Fertilizer for the same price as last year of $300.00 per ton for the estimated amount needed of 15 tons, for a total. of $4,500.00. EXHIBITS; Tabulation sheet. SUBMITTED BY -Jbhn J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent BIU _9235 - - - SID Turf fertilizer _ OPEN 1124/84 _ arpool Seed & ACCOUNT # 100-003-0064-8105 fertilizer QTY. -ITEM E C I T1 -~J~ b ADO V ~ OR OR EN It _ R VEN1n0f2 1, 15/T Turf fertilizer $300.00/T CITY COUNCIL 'AaMA BACK-UP SUMMARY MET II DATE OF MEETINGt February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid 0 9236 Roof Replacement SUMMARYt This bid is for the re-roofing of the old section of the Library, This is planned to use a Polyurethane/Foam roof as we used on the Civic Center Building last year, Also on item 2 to re-roof the South Locust street Substation Building, We bid it for either a built up tar and gravel roof or the Polyurethane/Foam roof, We at this point favor the Polyurethane/Foam roof and it is $200,00 less as per the bid. This bid was sent to twelve prospective bidders. ACTION REQUIREDi Approval by council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDSi Repair and maintenance account. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder for the Polyurethane/Foam roof at $14,949,00 for the Library and $2,800.00 for the South Locust Sub-Station, to Van-Wall Urethane Contractors, Inc. of Mansfield, Texas for a total bid of both projects of $17,749,00. EXHIBITSt Tabulation sheet. SUBMITTED BYt John-J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent I BID HID_ Roof Replacement Van-Wall Bell 'trip.io C OPHN„__1:2184_, Roofing Roofing ACCOUN'T' 1610-008-0253-8332--582 4 0303 004-020H-(1P ~'7MT 1 1 Public library 14,949.00 NIB bid to lat 2 1 South Locust Sub-Station $39000.00 Polyurethane/roam 2,800.00 NIB CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 'BACK-UP SUIMMARY SHOET DATE, OF MEETING'. ~ebruf~ry 'l, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEN 11 Consent agenda SUBJECT: Bid 11 9241 Fire Boots & Helmets SUMMARY This bid is for the purchase of replacement helmets, sUSponders and boots for the fire dopartment, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council and award of bid. SOURCE OIL FOUNDS: 1983-84 Budget funds account number 100-006-0051-8121 Fire Departmont protective clothing, RECOMMENDA'rIUN: We. recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meet:ing specifications as follows: Item #1 Helmets to Cusco Ind. e. $53.00ea. Item 02 Suspenders to DenMark 0 $ 6.75 en. Item 113 Boots to Kootter Co. 0 $45.0 ea. Total bid price $3,935.40 The bid of F.A,C,'r. on :item 3 does not meet specification. It does not have refloctive markings required or the steel shin guard, E\IIIBITS; abUlatiot Fleet. SUBMITTED BY: I Tom 1), Shaw, C.P.M. Asqistant Purchasing Agent KID 0_W a n dire Boots & Helmets OPDN 2 2 84 ' DenMark F,A,C,x, Casco Kootter ACCOUNT I- Q • IT -.'CRIPTI not" VE 0 t ENDO ENDO V) NDO 0 t VEBDOR 1. 12 Heli.tets 54.85 68,25 53,00 55.00 2, 80 Suspenders 6.75 7.60 7.00 6,90 31 60 Boots 47.50 39.50 48.00 45.99 Delivery 30-90 clay 10-90 day 15 days CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~T BACK-UP SUMMARY WEST DATE OF MEETINGi February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 11 Consent Agenda SUBJECTi Purchase Order 61590 to JS Equipment in the amount of $3,364.37 SUftkRYi This purchase order was issued for the emergency purchase of repairs for our equipment number 2490 used at our present landfill. This purchase order was issued and the work completed. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by council. SOURCE OF FUNDS Budget repair and maintenance account 710-004-0598-8710. RECOMMENDATIONi We recommend this emergency purchase order to "i Equipment be approved and invoice number 1993 for 1!,364.37 paid. EXIiIBITS: Copy of pu ase order 61590, invoice 1993. SUBMITTED BY ; ~ ~ Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent 1 1 d S CgWpnlent Service inc. 1604 Jackson M. R0,90038 Csrrolllon, Taxae 76008 Shop 2424W City of Denton Involoe No, 1993 Date, 1-10-84 215 E. McKinney Denton, Tg,♦,cau 224] Model serial No. Ea No. Authorized By Customer P.4. No, Cat 072 1 0 Deacrlptlon; Repair won't start, R and I right roller frame and track assembly Reseal right final drive leaking oil R and I service assembly and governor Recondidion Service assembly and governor Replace fuel transfer pump Labor (46.0 hrso reg4 field time) 3f 1$288600 ( r~.0 hrso field overtime) 168.00 Milage(368 miles) 220.80 Parts 1,687.57 :ax Pr rE TOTAL VOUNT DUE 3 3, 364.37 0 i CITY OF QRNY'ON, NACHASING DOPY. _ PUMASR ORMN NUMINR 51'S9~ 210 0. MoKint»y O"ton, Tons 7W1 11111117/11111WIll Dillow Ill 21111l M vOWN 40, low ti w101 NO. 01NV01111 ACCT, NO, J.S. Equip wt Service Will, 710-0044698-8710 Tot CITY OF OINTON Vehicle Maint. SHOW P.O.NO,ON ALL SHIPMENTS, ONLIVERY TICKETS, INVOICES ETC,. SEND INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYANLE, THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS IS EXEMPT FROM SALES TAX AS PER HOUSE MILL 020, THE CITY OF DENTON IS PROHIMITEO PROM PAYINO FOR MERCHANOISE NEFORE IT IS RECEIVED, ALL SHIPMENTS MUST 8E F,O,11., CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS. ITEM CITY STOCK NUMMER DESCRIPTION QUAN./UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 10 Rig #24%L R S I right roller frelae 6 assaalblyo reseal right final dr.o R 6 I service Asseably and governor. replace fret transfer pump. 1 3364437 DO Nr~T MAS ORDM D UPLZ TE JAPE 171984 Direct All Inquiries To; CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT, ~ John J, Marshall, C,P,M„ Purchasing Agent Tom D, Shaw, C,P,M., Asst, Purchasing Agent CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOi The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM., Bill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant DATE= January 31, 1984 SUBJECT; PURCHASE ORDER TO TEXAS WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. As you know, the Mosely Road Landfill site closed on January 31, 1984. As a result of this closing, it will be necessary to haul the solid waste collected in the City of Denton to one of the landfills located in Lewisville, Both the City of Parmers Branch and Texas Waste Management operate landfills in Lewisville and both entities have offored to allow the City of Denton to utilize their facilities. These facilities charge different rates for the disposal of solid waste and each operate during, different hours, The City of Farmers Branch charges $1,13 per cubic yard for the use of their facility and operates Monday through Friday, from 4;00 a.m. to 5100 p.m. The Texas Waste Management Landfill charges $1,35 per cubic yard, but is open 24 hours per day, six days per week, Although the rates are significantly higher at the Texas Waste Manage- ment Landfill, the operating hours will allow us to utilize the facility without disrupting our existing operating schedule, It is our intention to utilize the Farmers Branch Landfill as much as possible due to their lower rates; however, it will be necessary on some occasions to utilize the Texas Waste Management Landfill as the situation dictates, There- fore, we would strongly recommend that the City Council authorize the issuance of a purchase order to Texas Waste Management, Inc, for the use of their landfill facility. Should you have any comments or questions on this matter, please let us know. r Bill Angelo CITY OF OONTON, NFICHASiNO DSPT. i ~7~8 , PURCHAS# ORpI1t NUMBER 216 S, MaKlnneY , DfOW# Texas 76201 ~ 817/886.8311 D/PW Wro 2874042 3/2/114 ao No. VINOOa NO. TI►MI W.O. 40. 0101kr ACCT. *043G-Opt-W3.&$" r'~• SOOt 71! Tel CITY OF DENTON psbUC Vs k j 111 lswi8n'U** 2'X 75074719 . Y SHOW P.O. NOON ALL SHIPMENTS, DELIVERY TICKETS, INVOICES ETC.. SEND INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS IS EXEMPT FROM SALES TAX AS PER HOUSE HILL 9P20. THE CITY OF DENTON IS PROHIBITED FROM PAYING PO It MERCHANDISE BEFORE IT IS RECEIVED. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE F.O.H., CITY Cr DENTON, TEXAS. ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER OESCRIPTION gUAN,/UNIT PRICE AMOUNT &,;or Us* of DPW Laladti2l At following retest tm4tasd IBititslstrd bu Us . Cost $0000 560250.04 COIrWtod - $1.33 psr cubic Y* rd a Lwom $1.25 pair cubic yard Direct All Inquiries To CITY OP DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT. John J. Marshall, C,P.M., Purchasing Agent Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M., Asst. Purchasing Agent CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-U SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: February 7, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Bent Oak Addition SUMMARY: This 16.6 acre tract located on the west side of Teasley Lane (F.M. 2181) adjacent and east of the Southmont Place Addition is zoned planned development (PD) for office and duplex development. Utilities will be extended to serve this property. All preliminary plat requirements have been met. ACTION REQUIRED: Approve the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The planning and zoning commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat. ALTERNATIVE: Approve the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat 1 ' David Ellison Development Review Planner 0158a ad 95'1 r+'11 Ip , 71iU.f1A5 P) r~~ ~ /~,w~'.7"~11~T1 "i,lr ' Y,,V I,.t br7~fµ••M, J , I^~J _ S.'9' f_... ~..._.t nk ~4 ~V~ST I, ~•'~J'sL..t, ~v~ " ' S~ A %n i / .-'Ile ~~,~'2~e ~ ~ ' ^ O . ! 11 1 W 111 :IA 4 / I I I _ 1.1~ I i;.~ I IIn4 L,~I~NP ff I v ; AAAU 0 ~r... ~.j.~~ ADO ~ i o+ + 1 1 i 1 'p`. ,j Ill n +t~.. I ~,gfA n a n 04 ,J , . o ~ ~ ~ 6.86 , \~~r,' S i/ i (':C P<A Y+or 1 ~t~~~ \ f'{P 2 of S4K f_L ~t ? a' i. n I > I+,e rIR1s7 NAT' ' "f Jid ,o I G .,I ,1.:' NOlC 1. CONfOVR MS ARE r1M1 A p~E 'c Q WY OT DLNTM 7C1'O 16' Cf~S,?11. .irl 1~,1 V :.N j _ , -.1-= .-~0- •1 CFh \ MAP OATUI .SUY, 1~~1 Y 2 ~ ~ " ~ f ~ ►RD FOSCD 6" rGRCCM4A' Ir Q t _ rO CRISTINS I$^d1L+ll Yy rrr' t~~. WArC <AU/d! _ 6 rTa :I1 , a~r~ i 1 r -ot r_..I ~r7 f~fl . \Lti ' IrJ rxanrr C TK n il._ t t `d t L_..- ~?S0,_ ` ~•5 =-;5'7'6---,t-';:: rttMA19t RC i. _ t.rArb '~nBt r'. IR+"fJ'h 4y ~ _l„?tL°-.f'Crrr .u~wr [.w,,_•twr» TTY +^~'~f" n OC VCL OME R MANOR GREEN, INC. _ - ORWAAWARY hAr SCALE I" r /00' 1 oc roscz I 1'103 BEN 7'0AX Rev a6'C. 271 !4103 ecrAU A rorAl ox :6 u+ ACRro ,N stf[ DELIVERED DEC 2 9 1933 C. fAULLALICM S<UAVCyy A• 1p ' I„ ' OCNTON COWITYJ 7<XAl~ iyi: ' ~~';.'~1~., {yr{` V t1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACK-UP SWQ%E L SHEET MEETING DATE: February 7, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the sentwood Addition SUMMARY; This 9,8 acre tract located north of East McKinney Street at the western terminus of Montclair Place and Bob-O-Link Street is zoned planned development (PD) for single family use, Utilities will be extended to serve this property. Upgrading of a 165 foot section of offsite 611 sewerline to an all sewerline will be attached as a condition to provide sufficient sewer capacity to the development. Construction is planned in Phase I only at this time. No building permits will be issued for Phase II until the street adjacent to that phase is platted and dedicated. All preliminary plat requirements have 'peen met. ACTION REQUIRED; Approve preliminary plat with the condition that the developer upgrade a 165 foot section of o£fsite 61' sewerline to an 8" sewerline. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the condition that the developer upgrade a 165 foot section of offsite 6" sewerline to an ell sewerline. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the preliminary plat with condition 2. Approve the preliminary plat without condition ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat David Ellison Development Review Planner 0159a ad 4.; P ~n - Ali 37P: I ~J 4 40 u Its" W ~ . GNU" --A~ y - 1. . - ••ii. \ ~ i A W. eme 4.1 ~ ~•~yr- 1 q~j z 1 N w S~s o, pr 4~~ O O J LO) U _R W 11418. 1„ I Q 111 ~ Mi C'I",.,Y COUNCIL AGENDA RACK-UP SUMMARY SIIFET MEETING DATE: February 7, 1089 ,lIHJ1iCT: Approval of tho preliminary plat of lot 1, blocs: 1, Jones Addition SUMMARY: Proposed lot .1, block 1, Jonos Addition, is an 0,3P7 acre tract located ad,iacont and south of Hercules bane between Stuart koad and Atlas Street, The property is zoned peneral retall (GR) and a karate studio land use is proposed, WAter and setaer service is not available anfr must be extended. Plans for utilities have been submitted ant! must he approved durlnp the final platting stape, Cablo T. V,, gas and electric services exist: and are, adequate. ACTION RI?Q(JJTPFI): Approve the, preliminary plat PF.COMMFNDATTON: The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat, A1,T11RNATIVF: Approval of the prel iminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced p.1 at. J I`! FJ 13 Sol, Development Review Planner 0157a ad dfNCnwlRh[ ~6tNINPICVREt/N. plR fM f~((U`~~ NW IPWNL h. 10r'rlsi 01100 'C NIC I~1.[f. d' )WI 5L1'Ea , f tlR)SLQ ':IY lll':'yf ld E'Ir.r4/1 d".~' iLC:JII`f D SIU S N 4 , /i d'la lCuhpV 0, ,rlt~.a ~'~:.ae HE RCUI.ES l.AR! .[I+terrL rutq 111W rr,re tulA i ou 111t s 0,1,/1,a1no 'F1nNICEn6 DlU i4<a Ib RO'k .l HC[Y191. er Rl Ar 4sp I \ • 1 1 \ LIe1 { 1 rr r 1 yf r ~ /4 I \ o,ssta Ae. • 1(J x ) r n Y' till A ~ a V ~ Y N w t p i J 7P4 94 j r~ i 1 45G-~i o ~ 1 ?td~iril.i Nhi~~YY { ~Ll L^ rRIIN I r] l!'~ !f'!b' 81'ONt4mre Cj 17, .'"G5; DLNIIyN, t~.CdS Y•r01 I/vJ* r' •vy ft,. N •375' 0"W 7588' ~ r i2i 5 raAVll Alth SUN VALLEY ADDN. I 4r f Preliminary Plat of His. 1, Lot 1 JONES ADDITION Being A Replat of rl Three Traole In The -5 \ jl H.S.B. & C.R.R. CO. SUR. A-186 ,°1 r.o Denton County, Taxes sipt. rt, test 410 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PAPK-UP 8UMMARY sHF&T MEETING DA'L'E: February 7, 1984 SUBJECT: Appproval of the final replat of the Mesquite Ridge Addition SUMMARY; This is a 5,936 acre tract located at the northeast corner of Bernard and Collins streets. The property is zoned multi.--family (M6'-1) and the intent of the replat is to eliminate two (2) lot lines and form a one (1) lot subdivision. 'rho developer proposos to construct twenty-four (24) multi - family structures (96 total dwelling units) and sell each structure individually. Parking, open space and all property not utilized for public facilities will be reserved for common area. Adequate water and sewer, electrical, tele- phone, gas and cable services are available for extension to this site, Bernard Street is an improved collector. Collins Street is unimproved and is subject to perimeter street paving policies. Engineering plans for drainage improvements have been approved. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the final replat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the final replat. ALTERNATIVE: Approve the final replat ATTACHMENT; Reduced final replat David Ellison Development Review Planner 0157a iF i= S 9 n -d !a • 3 Logpriowv f 1~\rFl ~L I ;Y/4lJ~F~ I.III. :NIvEASlt'Y CITY APTS. T 9RUCE OAVEY < 591 i 14 Y iiiw i.. h1 ♦ r 1,40901~19'c 40 NBV+ r 1N~yye~'~,f I / ~d ibfio I~r I y_ - Id SIQNA OUILLIN 1 , 1 r«x,11 v«« ►a+•/ 948 /981 1411« 1 MI / I- • • +«4: 4t11NNM • C <a' uhl. FSS r.~ rf `W SM° '0'f b 0~~ p+ +r m va ; ti i SM°BS 'f~ a ~ WWi~ 1 l.- r\ ~GC1K FNU4 1 t,i ' W 1 +1 1~ r•~ 1 .O S PL AT A262 MICATJON THI 14 • ~ 58 iBW 1 B R. wKlres,oE 146 /512 RUB£CN i,4'rEST.NENTS, 5649 Tvur LfwisvHle, teloe 751 I r ~ 1.1 J RECF4Vr 131983 SCALE I°=100' OECEMB£R 3, 1983 FINAL MESQUI'r E RIDGE ADDITION Jd ~ Aeinq o Reolat of Pori 01 IAe Con4uislodor 3ubdlvlslon, Recorded In Book no, 4, Pq.26, P.A., 0 C.T. 5.909 acres in the ALEXANDER HILL SURVEY A-623 Oily 8 County or Cellon, Texas Jl CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA RACK-UP SUMMAPY SHEET HEITING DA1'F: February 7, 1081 SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of lots 1-ll, block 1, Northridge Subdivision SUMMARY; This final roplat is proposing a change frog eleven (11) lots to thirteen (13) lots, all of which are zoned single family (SF-10). Fa ch proposed lot conforms to zoning ordinance re- quirements in every regard. An additional change proposed is rear entry via a 20 foot access eas;Ament. Adequate streets, water and sewer, electrical, cable T.V,, gas and tolophone services are in place, Streets and drainage are also adequate, WTION REQUIRED: Approve the final replat PEC OMMEKIDATION ; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, ALT PRNATIVF: Approval of the final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat Da i(I EI I J son Development Peview Planner 0157a *WOWR QA PROJECT 511 t v k2R~tlfl!D4E . M-6 K E€._4rS I 1 UU, t u v v1(INITY MAP N.T.S. Wi, MEISENHEIMER SURVEY A-810 FY THOMAS TOf3Y I I I i SURVEY A-1288 U I W CORP _ SRERRI[E,IH MR OANC, Itt Ire AN pARW ORt+I I . ` G01tNIC MI IFN, --..f- PEN 1 Al lee ~l I Nl)~;UR S 89°OC) 34,1 10 0.99 -r 76 0 150 t5 0 1S0 '6.IB I _ pp 0 111)0 i80 ii tl0 U p0 u 0 l, II, '--`--.Q Q'' _ _f~ r, 4 IC) X 11 13 Ia S' a p [RR15,In 12 a M per ~i1 .I, IIR~.I. 'I r.. -i i`. U l.ll. .V... _ 4'U+U P ll.l i t 1 i i i I 1 I t~ t ou;;m t A l { I 1~ a I 1 0•tper Un, U t1i1 I ..:I I J+ M n u ~ I t +I p' I + , III I K' l I I ~ .L.... I I 1 tt.u Ir•r I I 1 1 r I II 1 I (n 1 I 1~ 1 i I i I I 1 t'h 1 I I 1 I II I I F ~a SF( I-)ON 4 I w 1 t~~r 1o' I fit.~+4K I I ~11rC RDLEI' ADD1 TI Ur! 1 111 I 1 I 1 y I(4 NORT HRIDGE' 1 4 66f CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK--UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE,; February 7, 1984 SUBJECT; Approval of the final replat of the west one half of lot 3, block 11, of the Alex Robertson Addition SUMMARY; This ,199 acre tract is located on the north side of Ruth Street approximately 208 feet east of Cook Street. The intent of the replat is to acquire a building permit for the construction of a single family dwelling. The property is zoned multi-family (MF-1) and residential devel- opment is anticipated. Adequate streets, utilities, drainage and other public facilities are available to the site. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval of the final replat 0 RECOMMENDATION, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the final replat. ALTERNA'T'IVE; Approval of the final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat David Ellison Development Review Planner 0192a of NO LOW, Fff 5 ALlCy EAST ~t 25' m ~ :n W^ m ~ R irk 98 ACRE. C ~ 1 f V ~ I v I Y J j v °yCt. ~ 1 1 i i ;,f Jar a'!J 'al S~~MI x~ufm nQ 1 ! i NFCS SI .~.5 51 25 r, 7 , ',05 TC E ET w ------i- - _ - RUT"- - - ---5- R f E T i_._ v' :I~~~'r tirl~o y r ~ V O N 7 S"ALE CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DA'Z'E: January 30, 1984 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning & Community Development SUBJEC'T': COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROJECT As of this date, the construction of an approximate 840 by 4 foot sidewalk along the west side of Ruddell Street, adjacent to the Phoenix Apartments, has been completed. This project was initiated by the Department of Planning and Community Development in order to provide a safer environment for those who reside at the apartments - a public housing project. There is approximately ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) in Community Development Block Grant funds available to pay for the construction project, At this time, I am requesting approval of payment to Sorenson Construction Co, in the amount of nine thousand nine hundred twelve dollars and eighty cents ($9,912.80) for the completion of this project, The final amount of. $9,912.80 reflects a $108.40 debit from the total for the placement of barricades at the site by the City. , Jeff M ja 0143j CfTYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ! TELEPHONE (817) 5668200 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Jeff Meyer, City Planner FROM: Roger Wilkinson, Right-of-Way Agent DATE: January 30, 1984 RE: Phoenix Sidewalk Project Please process final payment for this project. The cost for the barricades provided by the ity of Denton should be subtracted from the total bid. TOTAL BID $10,021.20 Barricades provided by City 108.40 9,912.80 Rogeg Wilkinson Right-of-Way Agent Is N0200E CITY of DENTGN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (8)7) 5668200 January 31, 1984 Sorenson Company P.O. Box 4338 Dallas, Texas 75208 Dear stay : Viu Sidewalk improvements for the Phoenix Apartments have een inspected and approved y City o Denton Engineering personnel. Plans are from City of Denton dated June 1, 1983', As-built drawings and a maintenance bond have been received and approved. The , improvements are hereby accepted with City of Denton maintenance beginning January 30, 1985. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, >ta er McDaniel Senior. Engineering Tech/Inspection 1s 110201E REC"'IVE D cc. tips ^S ~ I INVOICE No, 10 4 2 3 SoRBNSot~ COMPAITY ?,0, lox 4338 Dal-1&S, Texas 752.08 , , D.,t 1-6-84 -I CITY OF DENTON t purchasing DepzxtnLent 215 E "icKinney DEnton, T}; 7b20i ` of 1 ~ ...r• wlgM1 6wNfLD via s,a1 1! Dm Nc tus,u~tRt cots we rnet ' ,Mn J,ao,.'k' 1 to,µ otscsH+a~ MKi Ek odu~ I ~ MDtl.tt lMMR(t 1.93ft 10021.2 • 840'•4' Sidewalk phoenix Apartments (1002.1 Less; 10% }2etainage TOTAL BALANCE DUE -Semi Final r, 1 ti /1,I V I` V~T"ft ~ IhJ"u ~~pl I; Tit}: Y 0 ' ,;,v,-'.~✓ r- P'~ I ORIGINAL. INVOI E r.l- a~K na-t.. vyy ti 'V~.~'*-w'~r.+~~"tv.~.~,."„~.t 'yr~,r.. ' - ..z~..e;t..:s~i y-. r•~!wy'~'Y.r,... ,j.;s"~. 1 .1 CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOi The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMi Bill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant DATE; January 31, 1984 SUBJb;CT1 CONTRACT FOR THE USE OF THE CITY ON FARMERS BRANCH'S (CAMELOT) LANDFILL The closing of the Mosely Road Landfill Site on January 31, 1984, will necessitate the use of the two landfills located in Lewisville for the disposal of solid waste collected in the City of Denton, Both the City of Farmers Branch and Texas Waste Management operate landfills in Lewsivi.lle and both of these entities have offered to allow the City of Denton to utilize their facilities. The City of Farmers Branch has offered the beat rates with a per cubic yard price of $1.131 The rates offered by Texas Waste Management are significantly higher at a cost of $1.35 per cubic yard. Texas Waste Management does offer a more flexible operating schedule than Farmers Branch as the Texas Waste Management facility is open 24 hours per day, six days a week, Due to the lower price, it Is our desire to utilize the harmers Branch Landfill as the primary disposal site for our solid waste. For this purpose we have attached a standard operating agreement utilized by the City of Farmers Branch for their landfill customers. We strongly recommend that the City Council. authorize the City Manager to execute this agreement. Should you have any comments or questions on this matter, please let us know, t - Bill Angelo ~r CITY COUNCIL AGMI A BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF M ETTNG: February 7, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM # Consent agenda SUBJECT: Purchase Order 61813, Contract approval for Camelot Landfill use, SUrft RY: This is for the approval of our purchase order 61313 and the agreement with the City of Farmers Branch, Camelot Landfill for the disposal of solid waste. This contract is for use by the City of Denton until approval of our new landfill facilities have been obtained, We have estimated the usage at approximately $15,000.00 or 13,000 cubic yards, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by council. SOURCE OF FUNDS; Budget account 630-002-0803-8302 RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this contract and purchase order be approved for the approximate cost of $15,000.00 as per contract. EXHIBITS: Purchase order and contract. SUBMITTED BY: , John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent CITY-0 0WON PWICHAsm Derr f 8 i Fiii A~tl! O I 1 J 715 6, *Klnroy Duntwn Texas 78201 i17/li411Ii111 011rW K%"V "7-0"a OA" 1- 25-84 vasEwB sro. rarss w.o. ►so, 0v.IvW ACCT. N0, City of tarrasrs Br=eb sw 630-002-003-8302 Coasalot Landf ill 13000 wa. Dods m Tarkmy Tor CM OF OHNTON ist %ws BravAb, Tax" 7622 solid"sto dittat Charlie Jordon As directed SHOW P.O. NOON ALL SHIPMENTS, OELIVERY TICKETS, INVOICES ETC« SENO INVOICES TO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, THE CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS IS EXEMPT FROM SALES 'TAX AS PER HOUSE BILL 020, THE CITY OF OENTON IS PROHIBITED FROM PAYING FOR MERCHANOISE BEFORE IT 43 RECEIVEO. ALL SHIPMENTS MUST BE F.O.B., CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS. ITEM CITY STOCK NUMBER OESCRIPTION QVAN./UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1. t1se of Caaelot landfill for disposal of solidwasts 1.15 per s:y. eat. 14,950. Direct All Inquiries To; CITY OF DENTON, PURCHASING DEPT, y g John J. Marshail, C.P.M„ Purchasing Agent 1 Tom 0. Shaw, C,P.M., Asst. Purchasing Agent ti STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON SANITARY LANDFILL USE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Farmers Branch, Dallas County, Texas, a Home Mule City, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", is the Clymer and operator of a sanitary landfill situated in Denton County, known as the Camelot Landfill, hereinafter referred to as "Landfill", which landfill site has been duly permitted by the State of Texas; and MIEREAS, The City of Denton, Texas hereinafter referred to as "User" desires to contract with the owner for the use of the Landfill for the disposing of its refuse; and WHEREAS, the Owner is willing to contract with the User to make the Landfill available for disposal of its refuse; THEREFORE,, ABOVE PREMISES CONSTDI? UM) and for and in consid- eration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, it is agreed by the parties as follows: 1. Use of Landfill, For the duration of the year . beginning on the 1st day of FebrMl , 19 84 nud enditip, on the 31st day o . lu , 19 84 unTess sooner ter. minatedis ~icrei.liafLe pr(5vided, t1he Owner shell nermie the 1.1ger to utilise the Ocaner's Landfill for the duny)in€c of ehe User's refuse. 2, The User shall pay to the Owner a monthly charge based on the price of $_1,13 per cubic. yard of allowable reL'use clumped at the Landfill. The Owner shall bill the User on or about the first day of cacti month rollowinp the end of a month wherci.n th0 User dUmpe(1 1•e fuse on the Landfill. The User shall pay the Owner within ten (10) days of receipt of the monthly bill, In the event the User fails to timely pay the charges, the Owner, at its discretion, may ter- minate this contract by giving the User ten (10) days written novice, 3, All of User's vehicles shall carry readily ascer- tainable identification that is satisfactory to Owner. 4. The User shall not dump hazardous wastes as defined by the U,S, Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Texas Department of Health; barrels, tires, auto or truck bodies, 5. The Owner shall Zeep the Landfill open to accept User's refuse six (6) days a week, Monday through Friday between the hours of 4:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M,, and Saturdays between the hours of 7;00 AM, and 3:00 P,M,, including all holidays, except December 25 (Christmas Day) and January 1 (New Year's Day). 6, The owner shall construct and continually maintain an all-weather road maintained in a good, smooth con- dition from the public road through the Landfill to the dumping area. The Owner shall also construct and continually maintain w,^t-weather disposal facilities that will permit the site to be used during rainy, inclement weather, 7, a. User shall comply with all rules of operation established by Owner that are applicable to all users of the Landfill site, b. User estimates that the amount of monthly refuse to be deposited at the site to be -13.000 _ cubic yards. 8. All use, of the landfill is subject to applicable City, County, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regula- tions dealing, with the operation and use of a sanitary landfill site, 014NER - City of rarmers Branch Paul M, West, City Manager 13000 Wm, Dodson parkway l±nrmers Branch, Texas 75234 IMP. - G. City of t)enton,_Tex-is__~ EXi,CMD Chia tho day of 19 , OWNER, City of farmers Branch uTt-TsC; Cy anger USP:R, BY; APPROVED AS TO 1'ORt•1; - y Attorney CITY of vmrON, rBXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING i DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 5668100 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 2, 1984 T0; Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager FROM; Ann Bingman, Program Administrator SUBJECT, RENOVATION PROJECT CONTRACTS I have attached copies of two contracts for professional design and planning services, These services are related to continuation of renovation projects in the Municipal Building, The project elements include the following: 1. Develop a space plan for temporary courtroom 2. Develop a feasibility study and space requirements for future Municipal Courtroom 3. Develop an interior space plan for the renovation of the west end, main hall area of the Municipal Building 4. Develop specifications and prepare bid documents for office partitions and modular furnishings Both of the consultants have worked with us during the first phase of our project, the renovation of the police wing, and have provided many valuable and timesaving ideas and plans for our project, I request that you enter these contracts on the consent agenda for approval by the City Council at their meeting on February 7, 1984. Wnn III ngman mr Attachments; Contracts 00831 INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS B KNOB ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF DENTON g The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Home Rule City situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City," acting herein by and through its City Manager, and Jerry Wright, hereinafter called Consultant, hereby mutually agree as follower 1, SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: City hereby retains Consultant to perform the hereinafter designated services and Consultant agrees to perform the following servioss: A. To Municipal Buildings Renovation Projectsng services for the 21 COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONSULTANT: City agrees to pay Consultant for the services performed hereunder as follows: exceed t a total of Fifty ($50.00) and No/100ths Dollars, A. An hourly not No/100ths Dollars, B. Dates of Payments: By monthly invoice. 3. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY: It is mutually understood and agreed by and between City and Consultant that Consultant is an independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or con- sidered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas, for the purposes of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, or any other City employee benefit. The City shall not have supervision and control of Consultant or any employee of Consultant, but it is expressly understood that, Consultant shall perform the services hereunder at the direction of and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of Denton or his designee under this agreement, 4, SOURCE OF FUNDS: All payments to Consultant under this agreement are to be paid by the City from funds appropriated by the City Council for such purposes in the. Budget of the City of Denton. 5. SERVICES AND SUPPLIES O BE FURNISHED BY CITY: City agrees to furnish to Consultant the following services and/or supplies: A. None. 6. INSURANCEi Consultant shall provide at his own cost and expense workmen's compensation insurance, liability insurance, and all other insurance necessary to protect Consultant in the operation of his business. 7. CANCELLATION, City reserves the right to cannel this Agreement at any time by giving Contractor fourteen (14) jays written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement. 8. TERM. OF CONTRACT: This Agreement shall commence on the 8th day of February, 1984, and and on the 30ch day of September, 1984. EXECUTED this the day of 1984. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY; ATTESTr APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM C. J. TA~YLpO,R,, JR., /CITY ATTORNEY BY:' / 1C7ia-. BY, JERRY WRIGHTj CONSULTANT That , is hereby designated as the person to administer the'provision of this agreement. C17Y MANAGER DATE 0. °CHM FUJK7UNG, INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT'S AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § KN04J ALL MEP BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF DENTON § The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Home Rule City situated in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City,'' acting herein by and through its C.!y Manager, and Catherine F. Conrady, here- inafter called Consultant, hereby mutually agree as follows; 1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: City hereby retains Consultant to perform the hereinafter designated services and Consultant agrees to perform the following services; A. To provide professional design servinea for the Municipal Building Renovation Projects. 2. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONSULTANT: City agrees to pay Consultant for the services performed hereunder as follows: A. An hourly rate of Fifty ($50.00) and No/lOOths Dollars, not to exceed a total sum of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) and No/100ths Dollars. B. Dates of Payments: By monthly invoice. 3. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY: It is mutually understood and agreed by and between City and Consultant that Consultant is an independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or considered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas, for the pur- poses of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or sick leave benefits, or any other City employee benefit. The City shall not have supervision and control of Consultant or any employee of Consultant, but it is expressly understood that Consultant shall perform the services hereunder at the direction of and to the satisfaction of the amity Manager of the City of Denton or his designee under this agreement. 4. SOURCE OF FUNDS: All payments to Consultant under this agreement are to be paid by the City from funds appronriated by the City Council for such purposes in the Budget of the City of Denton. 5. SERVICES AND SUPPLIES TO BE FURNISHED BY CITY: City agrees to furnish tc Conculcnnt the following services andior supplies: A, :.one. PACE 01tE 6. INSURANCE; Consultant shall provide at her own coat and expense workmen's compensation insurance, liability insurance, and all other insurance necessary to protect Consultant in the operation of her business, 7, CANCELLATIOW City reserves the right to cancel this Agree- ment at any time by giving; Contractor fourteen (14) days written notice of its intention to cancel this Agreement, 8. TERM OF CONTIIACT; This Agreement shall commence on that 8th clay of February, 1984, and and on the 30th day of September, 198L>. EXECUTED this the dny of 1984, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS NY. CITY MANAGER ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN~ CITY SECRErA" APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY BY1 CONSULTANT B1'. CATHERINE CONRADY ASSOCIATE MEMBER, ASID That , is hereby desi8nated as the person to administer the provision of this agreement. bATE CITY IjkNAGER PACE TWO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE; February 7, 1984 SUBJECT; Request of the First Church of the Nazarene for a variance of Article III, Paragraph 4.09, Subparagraph (1), which requires extension of water and sewer mains across the full width of a lot proposed for development (V-2). SUMMARY; First Church of the Nazarene has submitted a final plat of a 2,1138 acre triangular shaped parcel located adjacent and south of Hercules Lane, adjacent and west of Sherman Drive (F.M, 428) and adjacent and east of lots 1-5, block 18, Royal Acres Addition, Section 5. The property is zoned single family (SF-10) and development of a church is anticipated. The subject tract is currently undeveloped and is not a part of an approved subdivision. Revar- end Phillip M. Smith of the First Church of the Nazarene conferred with staff prior to plat submission, and possibly prior to pur- chase of this property and inquired about platting and technical requirements. Members of the Planning and Community Development Department informed Reverend Smith that plat or lot of record approval, in accordance with the subdivision regulations and land develop- ment code, is required before a building permit can be obtained for property in the City of Denton. A key general requirement of the subdivision regulations is that water and sewer mains be extended across the full width of the lot proposed for development (defined by plat or lot of record) in such an alignment that it can be extended to the next property in accor- dance with the master sewer and water plans for the city. Water and sewer service pre- sently ends at the east boundary line of lot 1, block 18, of the Royal Acres Addition. The subject property has 403 feet of frontage along Hercules Lane and 407 feet of frontage along Sherman Drive. After the Development Review Committee informed the petitioners of the requirement that water and sewer mains; be extended across the full width of their lot along Hercules and/or Sherman Drive, :-he deci- sion was made to request a variance. City Council Aggenda First Church of the Nazarene Variance Page Two The Develo~w6 nt Review Committee as a body is supportive of the Utility Department's recom- mendation that utility extension requirements not be waived for this development. The requireuaent in question has beea stlard for some tl.me and is one that practically every developer must comply with in the City of Denton. The technical reasoning behind such a requirement is logical and is desiggned to insure that adequate utilities are avail- able throughout the City at the developer's expense. This property is particularly impor- tant because Sherman Drive or F.M. 428 is a state highway which requires water and sewer service on both sides. Attached Development Review Committee minutes address the water and sewer situation and staff members will be available to respond to additional technical questions. VARIANCE PROCEDURE. Chapter III of the Subdivision Regulations and Land Development Code of the City of Denton provides that variations and modifications of the general requirements may be made by the Planning and Zoning Commission when, in its ,judgement, special or peculiar factors and conditions warrant such variations and do not 1 affect the general application or spirit of the rules and regulations or the Master Plan of the City. Advice and cooperation is to be j offered by the Development Review Committee and an affirmative vote by the majority of the Planning and Zoning Commission is required to approve a variance. Denial of a variance is final unless appealed to the City Council for a final decision. Ad:acent property owners must be notified of tle variance request at least ten (10) days in advance of a required public hearing. Finally the development code further prescribes that In no case shall the Planning and Zoning Commission grant variances or modifications unless it finds that all the following conditions are satisfied; 1. The modified proposal would conform to the City Master Plan. 2. Literal enforceatent of a provision would restAt in extreme hardship for the devel- opment of the Subdivision. City Council Agenda First Church of the Nazarene Variance Page Three 3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect o£ ppreventing Che ordorly sub- division of ott7er land use in the area, 4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent of the standard. 51 The problem in question is not generally common to other properties in the City. (If the problem standard in question is of general application to numerous prop- erties throughout the city, the Planning and Zoning Commission is prohibited from granting such variance and should recom- mend that the City Council change the ordinance, instead.) 6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the property shall be considered for modification of the standards. 7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to the property itself as dis- tinguished from a hardship relating to convenience. 8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or property owner's own actions. ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny variance request RECOMMENDATION: The water/wastewater division of the Utility Department has reported that it is technically possible to serve this site from existing lines from the Royal Acres Subdivision without the required extension, but it is not in favor of the variance request. The Planning and Zoning Commission saw no justification for approval of the variance request and conditions for approval prescribed in the subdivision regulations have not been satisfied. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of the variance. ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny variance request. City Council A enda First Church o the Nazarene Variance Page Four ATTACHMENTS; 1, Reduced map 2. Development Review Committee minutes of November 22, 1983 3, Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of December 14, 1983 11 , f ' David son Development Review Planner 01688 I IITt~1 vic3m TY NA/ MINCULIS IT, NIA `A! :ZwJr ~w4w►..n / ll} PIAFT CMURCM 01' T'ML NAZAANNC 3 ` . fat l~►NtJ 1, Yi/MN •MH.M J/,pv ' ~ / I .l rn+ 4 cw rn •f M•n4 fiJa1 i' r, 't. r~ \ 4r f 10 ♦6 iI a.4 oar ,/JG44! Minutes Development Review Committee November 22, 19$3 DRC M4mbers Present: Jackie Doyle, David Ellison, Wa}me Horsley, Ken Lamberson, Don McLaughlin, Koorosh Olyai, Denise Spivey, Tommy Stone, Bob Hageman, David Ham, Harlan Jefferson and Pablo Rubio Engineer Present: Brian Burke 111, Review of Drainage and Utility Extension Waiver - Nazarene Addition A. Engineering 1. Drainage waiver is granted. 2. For, utilities information contact Engineer Greg Edwards regarding plans for Hillhaven Addition, 3. Preliminary plat is acceptable. B. Water and Sewer 1. Utility Department does not want to waive utility extension requirements for this development. 2. Sherman Drive is a state highway and would require water and sewer on both sides; therefore, water service could not come from 12" waterline on east side of Sherman Drive. 3. The Hillhaven Addition is currently planning on extending the existing sewerline on Sherman Drive to the north of this property. If that developer wishes to obtain a pro-rata agreement with the city, our department could not waive the requirement for this project. Pro-rata would be 100% of the cost of the line along the frontage of the proposed sewerline. 4. Water would have to be extended along Hercules or Sherman Drive. The Hercules Street waterline extension would be the least expensive option. This extension would not be required to bore Sherman Drive to loop into a proposed 12" waterline extension. However, it would have to extend to the right-of-way on Sherman Drive. 5. If Hillhaven project is not developed, the sewerline would need to be e.-tended to the corner of Hercules Street and Sherman Drive. C. Electric No comment. D. Building Inspection Waivers are acceptable. H'inutes Development Review Committee Nazarene Addition November 22, 1983 Page 2 E, Transportation Engineering No comment. F, Fire Waivers acceptable, G. Parks and Recreation No representative from this department was present. H. Lone Star Gas 1. Waivers acceptable, 2. Service is available from Sherman Drive. 1. Waivers acceptable, 2. Service available, J. Cox Cable Waivers are acceptable. K. Solid Waste Waivers are acceptable, L. Planning and Community Development 1. Preliminary plat is scheduled for action at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of November 30, 1483, 2. Drainage study waiver is acceptable. P >a 4 NliI)Utes , Decemi er 14, 1983 Page 2 G. Consider abaiidonment of fifty (50) feet of public ri•grnt•of-way dedicated for Continental Street in the McAninch Addition in the City of Denton. H. Approval of-the preliminary plat of lot IR, block 1, Writer Addition. Cna)rman announced that item A iias been withdrawn from the agenda and asked that item 13 be removed from consent agenda and considered at end of agenda. It was moved by Mr, Escue, seconded by Idr. Claiborne, and unanimously carried t6-0)'to approve consent agenda with exception of items A and B. 111. Puolic Hearings A. J ! -Request of tiie First Courcri of the Nazarene for a variance of Article 111, Paragraph 4,09, Subparagraph (1), wuich requires extension of water and sewer mains across tue full width of a lot proposed for development. Mr. Ellison stated that five notices were'mailed to adja- cent property owners as required; no reply forms were received in favor, four reply forms were received in opposition. He explained that the subdivision regulations and land development code requires extension of water and sewer mains across the full width of property, proposed for development, this lot has frontage on both Shherman and Hercules. Brian Burke, engineer, stated that the petitioner does not feel it is necessary to extend water and sewer lines across full width of property to build the proposed church, that lie advised them it was a standard requirement but they de,;ided to request a variance. On question, he said they nave indicated they would be willing to pay pro rata snare for what is there now, Cnairman asked if h'e explained teat the requirement was for the orderly development of the city and hr, Burke replied yes. Ms. Lyle Springer, noilleuwner immediately adjacent to lot, stated they are opposed to a variance of water and sewer requirements oecause of existing water pressure and be- cause tile), do not Know uow sewerage would be affected. Sue continued tnat they are not opposed to tile cnurcti, however, they do not i:eel this is the proper place to build a caurcn, Sne aSKed now the churcii would oe situated on tine lot and where exits would be, Mr. Burke replied that ne had seen a site plan that snowed the front door on Sherman with exits on both Snerman and Hercules. P 4 Z Minutes Doolamber 14, 1983 Page 3 John Small asked whether a driveway would be allowed off Sherman and Mr. katliins said that th•, curb cut would be reviewed by building official; however, he thought the curb cut would meet city standards. Mr. Fisher explained that petitioner to requesting a waiver of normal requirements, that tl+, Utility Department does not feel this particular request meets criteria for approving a waiver, He continued that there is an exist- ing b" water line that dies at property line and a 1211 sewer line across Sherman but since Sherman is a state nigaway and the state does not allow boring, a line would be required on both sides of Sherman, He said it is the interpretation of Utility Department that this lot does not Have service available, The proposed hillhaven Addi- tion was discussed and Mr, Fisher said that if this addi- tion is developed plans are to extenu existing sewer line on Sherman to the north of this property, on question, lie said this particular *use would not have any utility impact on tnat line, fie further stated that development Review Committee recommends denial of the variance request and Utility Department feels that setting a precedent is an important issue. Petitioner offered no rebuttal, Ms, Springer asked about cost to other property owners dnd Mr. Fisher explained that outcome of waiver request would not affect their situation. Cnair declared public nearing closed, Mr. La)~orte commented that lie saw no reason to vary requirements, that required extension is for orderly development to the north. Mr. Juren moved to deny variance request. Seconded by . 'Pearson and unanimously carried (6-0). Mr. Watkins left chambers at this title. B. Z-102 Tnis is the petition of Marvin Morgan Construc- tion ompany, Inc. requesting a change in zoning from agricultural ( A ) to the planned development (PD) classi- fication on a 11.877 acre tract ueginning approximately 130 feet west of Bellaire Drive and approximately 850 t.eet north of Bast McKinney Street, if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit a single family aetacned development with a minimum lot size of. 00, x 1001, Mr, Ellison gave results of toe original mailout for this case as 25 notices mailed to property owners; two reply forms received in favor, four reply forms received in PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMM1lNDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To: City Council Case No, Z-1624 Meeting Date: February 7, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Ana Rocco Pena 4500 Valleycrest. Drive Arlington, Texas 76013 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: Change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) clas- sification Purpose: Single family detached (along Riney Road frontage), single family at- tached (townhouses) and duplexes Location and Size: 14.0734 acre parcel located along the east side of Riney Road, adjacent and east of U,S, Hwy, 77 :end north of 171ndsor at a point approximately 220 feet east of the intersection of Riney Road and Windsor Drive Existing Land Use: Single family residential, triplex and vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zonin&: North - Single family, agricultural; SF-16, Agricultural (A) North- east - Denton North Apartments, Kings wood Estates Apartments, North Horizon Townhomes, institution a], vacant, agricultural; PD-8 MF-1, D111-P, PD South - Single family, vacant ; SF-7, SF-l0 ]past - Single family, agricultural, vacant; Agricultural (A), MF-1 West - Single family, vacant, park land; Agricultural (A) Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity (Case NZ-1624) Pape 2 SPBCIAI. INFORMATION Public Utilities: Adequate water, sewer, electrical., tel- ephone and gas service is available for extension to this site. Transportation Systems: This property has approximately 1,700 feet of frontage along Riney Road, an unimproved collector. If approved, the developer will be responsible for dedi- cating appropriate right-of-way and providing pavement, and curb and gutter improvements to half of Riney Road. The property also has approximately 41 feet of frontage along Windsor Drive. This plan proposes use of an internal north-south residential street with 40 feet of right-of-way at its southern tip and the standard SO feet of right- of-way beyond the north property line of an abutting residence, The Planning f, Zoning Commission felt that interior streets should be public and she north- south street connecting with U,S. 77 is proposed as a public street. An east- west interior street is also proposed and was added after some members of the Planning $ Zoning Commission suggested additional public access, U. S. Highway 77 is a primary major arterial maintained by the State. This site has approximately 970 feet of frontage along highway 77. One en- trance is proposed off Highway 77 to serve the proposed development. Two driveways are in place to serve an existing triplex and single family residence. Traffic: This development will generate approxi- mately 970 vehicle trips per day. Traf- fic generated b), this proposal will not negatively impact affected streets. (Case #7-1624) Pago 3 M CIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Drainage; Drainage has been cited as a major consideration. In general the proposed residential use with an over ll density of 6,9 units per acre does nat consti- tute a potential drainage problem; particularly in view of the fact that a previous proposal at considerably highe density level (12-14 units per acre) received a positive ratinp on drainage. A detailed drainage analysis and plans for any requlred improvements must be submittod before plat approval may be granted, ZONING HIF'TORY The City Council denied the request for a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the plannecl development (PD) cl.assifIcation for 118 multi-family and 41 two family units on this sane 14,0734 acre tract on May 17, 1963 (Z-1576). Considerable opposition from the Northridge community appeared to be a factor, and questions about drainage wero also stated as a concern of the City Council, Tho Planninp, and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1576 by a vote of 5-1 with three (3) conditions, Staf. also recommended approval of the request. Consideration of a new change in zoning petition within twelve months of a previous request (ices not violate existing policies if the new proposal is different and less dense, (Case Nz-1624) Page 4 ANALYSIS The request for multi-family and two family use at this site generated a considerable amount of technical discussion and public attention when considered in the .iummer of 1983, The developers of the above referenced proposal (referred to as Meisenheimer Ad- (1ition) worked with staff extensively in designing a proposal that addressed both technical problems and satisfied key development guide policies, The present request for attached residential units, duplexes and single family detached development at an average density level of 6,9 units per acre appears to be reasonable. The Planning f zoning Commission asked several site planning ques- tions because information on setbacks, on-site parking, access and type of residentiai structures was less than adequate when re- viewed, The present plan now shows fifteen (15) single family detached residences along Riney Road on lots typically 80' x 110' In size, thirteen (13) duplexes (proposed for individual sale and townhome marketing), and 56 total units of what is described by the petitioner as attached residential development. Ninety seven (97) total living units are proposed at the site, After consider- ing comments of those in opposition and those in favor of the request, the Planning $ zoning Commission instructed staff to work with the petitioner in clarifying site planning questions. The majority of the Commissioners accepted the proposed density and subsequently recommend approval of the request, Those opposed cited action on a previous request for multi-family and duplex land use that was denied by the City Council, J J- , (case OZ,-1624) Page 5 RECOMMENDATION The Planning t Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1624 with the following conditions; (Vote; 4-2) 1, A maximum of. 97 dwelling units shall be constructed at the site at an overall density level of 6.9 units per acre, 2. The developer shall dedicate appropriate right-of-way and provide necessary off-site street and drainage improvements in accordance with City of Denton requirements along half of Riney Road from Windsor Drive to highway 77 prior to issu- ance of building permits, 3. Development shall generally conform with approved 1'D concept plan; detailed site plan approval, in addition to prelimi- nary and final plat approval, is required before issuance of building permits. The comprehensive and specific plans For parking, ingress-egress, landscaping, buffering and screen- ing must be approved before building permits are issued, 4. Development shall include an interior north/south street to be built as a standard residential street and dedicated as a public road with a minimum right-of-way of forty (40) feet. 5. Development shall include an intersecting roadway running east/west from proposed interior north/south street to Piney Road with a minimum right-of-way of 50 feet; location of said street to be a' bend of Riney Road or a point approxi- mately 100 feet south of bend if a traffic hazard would be created. 6. If site is not developed within four (4) years, zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) classification, (Case #Z-1624) Page 6 ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition with conditions 2, Approve petition without conditions 3, Approve petition with additional conditions 4. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1, Aerial 2, Concept plan 3. Reply form totals 4. Property owner list S. Minutes of Planning F, Zoning Commission meeting of December 14, 1983 ja OOSSj • r a A Yom! \ I .A t a 1 Y ~.S i • Y Jy • . -i~ , 4t 9~•Y.O a 1.• ~ y 4 1 ~Q. . V-1 ~ IM1 • 4. „1~ t t♦<Frl j+. ~ •!~•Mf• ~ fin. 1 y, ` A r.,rZ •f~y, n~ia„`.. ~n•l«Kf Y/7a'' h~p.:~.~ _ ~ 4 ~ s to N / 14 4 t Ne js t . \ 11 ~ ° a 114 4 \ a / tea t \ \ JI t ! U 0 1 a L t C \ \ et ~VA _ a t t t E t t t 97 rOTAL UMM5 6.9 UNITS PER. ACRE t L E C 1 a s109aLE rAUnty ocfiACHED • Is t ! t S r, b 2 PAMILV U51M • 13LOrS I 2C UNlrs ArrACHED RS CWflALVN1r3 44 94 LIM fl 1 tt , t E L i n L < r L li i E' 1 11 I ant " ! ! e ';b it of OFF SrREEr DARKM fi rHERE ARE A MINIMUM CF 1 L 50ACEC PER A'ITALHCD RESIDENTIAL UNITS 11Y1 N r. U• 1 !MV r'rv„I fTS:nOIVA' SCALE I' •100' I _ NOVEM61'R 10,190 -Cn, OIL 12, 083 JAN 10,'11W ,p, SITE PLAN 14.073 Ac. N H ME15CM14EIMER SURVEY A-610 CITY ANO COUNTY or DENroN r.Y PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1624 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Richard L. Riney Jae C, Thomas 1112 Linden 700 Northridge Denton, Texas benton, Texas 382-2615 E, Deats Headlee 418 Magnolia Mr,.& Mrs, Bill Payne Denton, Texas 624 Northridge Denton, Texas r, R, McEuin, Jr, and Dottie' 3101 Donna. Road Denton, Texas 387-9157 Mr. & Mrs, Melvin Dane 1028,West Windsor Denton, Texas Ralph E Cordray 1509 Riney Denton, Texas Pat Parker 1128 Riney Road Denton, Texas Charlie Cunningham Route 5, Box 30 Denton, Texas Edward R. Cottle Route 5, Box 55 Riney Rd Denton, Texas I r t y I /11 L777a' vI \ hl v', Co~~C1ra 1 ' I Oe~• l5U6~~ ~ r' J r, Fir I I'IR I} l~ r lr I;~TJi_, C~ rl 1 rv ~,hco; I~ C M I ~:c~r~,n,I~o car. s c c`, SCi L r f} f, J :3 11 e 11 t'~tTvI C(I r 1 . I w : 1 f'~~I:. r J r Y1.I ~~f:il r r: r tYv 1 I h . ` / 6 r J 7 1I ~ I 1. r,•ti ~ G T r r Qt,~~~ l i l l ~_r W 1" Idn +-rl ' d (,e r -so e L, I ~ I LJor+IrIrids • I I ~ + ~r (Ile P, A 1 f i L Le c<nj 1~ f r r r ' I 1 K a I Y Minutes December 14, 1983 Page 5 Mr, Fisher stated that utility departments concern is that utility layout is not approved when site plan is accepted, He asked that this be understood by all parties; they do not want to get locked into utility layout at this time,. Mr, Ellison continued staff report with recommendation that request be approved subject to approval of drainage solutions and facilities by engineering department, utility layout to be determined during platting stage, and minimum lot size to be u,000 square feet. Chairman asked if petitioner understood staff's recommended conditions and Mr. Morgan answered that conditions were acceptable to him. Chair declared public nearing closed, Chairman commented ,tnat staff had worked with petitioner and now had a good arrangement, Mr, Escue moved to recommend approval of Z-1623 with the following conditions: 1. Final.plat approval and building permits small not be obtained until adequate drainage solutions and facili- ties are approved. Development shall be limited to single family detached housing wiO a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet, typical lot size 601x1001, 3, Final utility layout shall be determined during the platting stage. Seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously carried (6-0), Mr, Watkins returned to the meeting, C,J Z-1624. This is. file petition of Ana Rocco Pena requesting f a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification on a 1.4,0734 acre parcel located along the east side of Riney Road, adjacent and south of U. S, Highway 77, and north of Windsor Drive at a point beginning approximately 220 feet east of Riney and Windsor. If approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the construction of single family detached housing (17 lots with a typical size of 80' x 1101) alorig Riney Road and single family attached (townhouses) on the balance of t,ie tract. A total of ninety-seven (97) dwelling units is proposed, R Z Minutes December 14, 1985 Page 6 Mr. Ellison explained that the City Council had denied a request on tnis same piece of property in May, 1983i that they were allowed to come back because of a change n plan and a decrease in density from 12-13 units per acre to 6,9 twits per acre, On question, he said that no guidelines ,exist on now many units constitutes a decrease in density. Chairman suggested that guidelines be established for ,planned developments. Mr, Ellison continued that this is not a request for wulti-family; it is a request for single family detached and single family attached. He further stated that 24 notices we're mailed to property owners; three reply forms.were received in favor, two reply forms were received in opposition-and one undecided reply form was received, Ana Rocca Pena, petitioner, stated that she owns one half of the property; the other half is owned by Dr, and Sirs. .Don Dailey, whom she represents. Sue said after many months of personal review and study she is submitting this plan for single family attached and single family detached housing at 6,9 units pper acre density. She said that at that density it will be financially impossible for her to pave Riney Road and sne is respectfully requesting that paving of Rine), Road not ue °required. Slie said she feels that no developer should be required to pave a long road like Riney Road. She said that if site is required to pave Riney that would dictate developing the property with higher priced 'homes. She continued that the area needs to be improved and she feels proposed development will in- crease value of entire area; the completion of recent drainage improvements would protect the neighborhood against drainage problems. On question, she said she did not yet know the type of construction; that nobody wants to do anything until the property is rezoned, i Greg Edwards, engineer, 'stated that lie had been retained to redo the site plan and has addressed many of the things that were initially opposed. He said they have added single family detached along Ririe), Road and they feel the density is well within Development Guide standards for this particular development. He said one access to High- way 77 and one access to Windsor are ueing provided. Chairman asKed if interior strip would ue built as a street or a driveway, Mr, Edwards answered that it could be either way, however, they only own a 40 foot wide strip, Judge Ray Martin stated he is familiar with this request and witil the petitioner. He advised that this board does not nave the authority to interfere with a person's use of his property; that zoning power does not constitute power to tell people how to develop their property except out of safety of people, riealth of people and morals of people. P 4 x Minutes Dec'e'mber 14 1983 ' Page 7 He further stared that the state statute which requires sending notices within 200 feet is because people live there and have a personal concern, that there are only two people who own property within 200,feet wr~o would have a personal concern. He also pointed out that a recent deci- sion of the Supreme Court says that cities cannot require streets, sewers and other improvements unless market value of property is increased more than the assessment; and, in this case, it would unlawful to require improvement of Riney Road. H.e asked that commission stay withi~i confines of police power. Chairman advised that all people who own property within 200 feet are presumed to have'an interest in proceedings and ne would not deny a person the right to speak. Yranklin Daniel, 1505 Riney, stated he has lived there since 1907, that there nas been no development on either side of street, He said they do not have sewerage,, teat since the last hearing the city did come out and blacktop t'lie street. He said he feels this would be the highest and bes: use of property. He further stated that some of the people who opposed tike last request seemed to be against renters and housing for senior citizens and minorities, Deats Headlee'stated ne owns all the property on south side of Windsor between Carroll and Hinkle except for two houses. He said lie is in favor of request if 1) Riney Road is opened to a full 60 foot street to carry the traffic generated by this development, 2) drainage is provided which would not create a problem to the south, and 3) the road through the property is developed a!, a public street rather than a driveway. He suggested another opening to Riney Road oetween Highway 77 acid Windsor since it would be a distance of 1700 feet. lie said lie th oug?it proposal was a good plan and wouldn't hurt other property if drainage and traffic could be taKen care of. He asked if there would be any two story development and Mr. Edwards 'said attached housing would probably be two story, townhouse type, He said lots fronting on Riney Road would be 80'x110' for single family detached housing, that behind tnose would be attached units probably duplex type. Lee Sample, 607 Northridge, said tie is concerned about this addition devaluing his property, He is concerned about traffic coming dowci Northridge to get to Carroll since Windsor is not open all the way, Melvin Daniels, adjoining property owner, said his concern is water, that terrain holds water and when terrace is taken down and replaced by buildings, concrete, etc,, water will come down on iiim, P Z Z Minutes December la; 1983 Page 8 Ralph Morrison, 816 Northridge, stated that presentation was confusing! He said he is concerned about traffic con- gestion; the plan does not show parking spaces and cars will be parked on the street, emergency vehicles will not be able to get through. He commented that at the last .hearing the mayor recommended that multiple housing not be encouraged in this area', Mr. Ellison continued staff report stating that adequate water, sewer and electrical are available, Riney Road is .a collector street and has to be improved as development occurs; if petitioner wishes to not improve Riney Road she would have to requ%~st.a variance. She would be required to pave and curb and gutter one half of the road with 34 feet of paving, He said that the interior access needs to be improved as a public street, that houses along interior have to front on a public street, He said that normal right.-of-way width can be modified but pavement width has to be 31 feet. He said that present proposal will gene- rate approximately y7u vehicle ;.rips per day, tnat staff does not feel affected roads would be negatively impa(-.ted by traffic. Staff feels that drainage, with present pro- posal, can be handled; that will be addressed during plat- ting stage. He said staff is concerned about site plan, that at this time it is too vague; staff feels that single family detached, single family attached and duplex land use is acceptable but single family detached housing front- ing on a collector street may not De a good idea. He said site plan is not adequate, staff could eituer get with developer before going to City Council or nave developer come in with a plat as the specific site plan. He said site plan should indicate type of houses, height, setbacks and parking. He also suggested that property owner to south and east deserves some protection. He questioned amount of green space provided. He continued that density/ intensity is not being violated'and staff recommends ap- proval with conditions. Mr. Claiborne asked about an east/west roadway between the interior street and Riney Road, repeating the cdncern expressed about emergency vehicles, Mr. Ellison answered that fire department had an opportunity t.o look at proposal and did not object, Mr. Olyai said ne did not see the need for suggested street, that it could create a visioility problem. On question about proposed interior nortn/south street, Mr, Clark said that street wou)6 be a standard residential street with uack to back curb; pie said that a public street would be required if they are going to sell lots, that street snould be a full 50 foot rigiit-of-way. Mr. Ellison advised tnat a private street could oe approved in a PD request but ire didn't .j,now now it would affect selling the r G Z M nuts$ Deceinber 14, 1983 Page 9 lots, tie suggested requiring a public street. on ques- tion aoout a possible condo type development, Mr. Edwards said a condo plan could be filed with the county and an individual unit could be sold to an individual buyer as a condo, that tnere are many options on the market. Mr. Ellison said staff feels proposed land use is acceptable and site plan issue can be addressed, In rebuttal, Ms. Pena said she has a contract on the prop- erty, she decreased' density as suggested by staff and now has a chance to develop the property, She said she would not be able to pave Riney Road and.asked that city improve that street. She said she felt proposed development would add value to neighborhood. Chair declared public hearing closed. Mr. Duren movea to recommend approval of Z-1bk4 with the following conditions: 1. A maximum of y7 dwelling units shall be constructed at the site at an overall density level of 6•.9 units per acre, k. the developer shall dedicate appropriate right-of-way and provide necessary off-site street and drainage improvements in accordance witn City of Denton re- quirements along half of Riney Road from Windsor orive to Highway 77 prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Development shall generally conform with approved PD concept plan; detailed site plan approval, in addition to preliminary and final plat approval, is required before issuance of building permits, fhe comprehen- sive and specific plans for parking, ingress-egress, ,landscaping, buffering and screening must-be approved before building permits are issued. 4. Development shall include an interior north/south street to be built as a standard residential street and to be dedicated as a public road with a minimum right-of-way of 40 feet, sub3ect to securing a variance. S, oevelopment shall include an intersecting roadway running east/west from proposed interior north/south street to Riney Road with a minimum right-of-way of SU feet; location of said street to be at bend of Riney Road or a' point approximately 100 feet south of bend if a traffic nazard would be created. P 4 Z Minutes December 14, 1983 Page 10 6. If site is not developed within four (4) years, zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) classifi - cation, The iutersec,ting east/west street was further discussed with Mr. Olyai repeatin that lie didn't see the need for it, that regardless of focatiou of opening there would be a visibility problem on Riney Road. Mr. Pearson seconded the motion stating that Commission is dealing with land uses,'not structures, He said that with Windsor as a major arterial and Highway 77 as a major arterial, this is 'a logical breaking point for higher dens;ty. He said he is in favor of allowing staff to work out details on site layout, Mr, Escue questioned the need for toe east/west street. Mr. Juren said lie would be willing' to withdraw that portion of his motion. Mr. Pearson said iie favored leaving the east/west street in, that lie felt it would provide a way for some inter- action between Riney }toad and the interior street and it would provide an additional outlet for the development, .Vote was called; Aye - Llaiborne, Cole, Juren, Pearson Nay - Escue, LaFor.te Motion carried (4-2) , D. 2.1625. This is the petition of Tom Fouts requesting a c ►ange in zoning from single family (5F-16) to the planned development (PD) classification. Tae tract is approxi- mately 3.1 acres in size and is located between Conway Street and proposed Ridgeway Drive, approximately ISO feet southwest of the adjoinment of Loop 288 and the 1.3s ser- vice road. If approved, - the planned development (PD) would permit the construction of a two story office/retail structure, of which 24,000 square feet of second floor office area, and 22,000 square feet of first floor retail area is proposed, Caairman announced that thiF item has been withdrawn from agenda at the request of petitioner; that petitioner has asked that item be placed on the Planning and Zoning Com- mission agenda of January 25 and property owners would be notified of that nearing. Mr. Juren left tiie meeting, 625L NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS, BY' ORDINANCE NO, 69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 14.0734 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE N. H. MEISENHEIMER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 810, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I. The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the following described property, to-wit: TRACT 1. All that certain tract or Parcel of land situated in the N. H. Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract 810, Denton County, Texas, being all of a certain tract described in a deed from C. C. Smith, at ux, to Horacio Pena, at al, on the 12th day of October 19760 and recorded in Volume 808, Page 920, Deed Records of said County, and being more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Pena Tract at c steel pin at a fence corner on the south boundary line of, U. S. 4ighway 77; THENCE south along and near a fence on the east boundary line of said Pena Tract a distance of 804.83 feet to an iron ppin at a fence corner at the northeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Cleora Parker to Melvin R. Dane on the 27th day of June, 1964 and recorded in Volume 511, Page 596, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 89°17'08" west with the north boundary line of said nano Tract a distance oc 196.0 feet to an iron pin at a fence corner at the northwest corner of said Dane Tract; THENCE south 0°02'47" west with the west boundary Line of said Dane Tract along and near a fence a distance of 318.5 feet to an iron pin in the middle of Old Sanger Road at the southwest corner of said Dane Tract; THENCE south 87°40'28" west with the middle of Old Sanger Road a distance of 42.88 feet to a found iron pin at l:he southeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Grady R. McEuin, Jr., at ux to J. A. Miller and recorded in Volume 921, Page 485, Deed Records; THENCE north 0°10'56" east with the east boundary line of said Miller Road a distance of 117.97 feet to a found iron pin at the northeast corner ox said Miller Tract; THENCE south 89°53'45" west with the north boundary lino of said Kilter Tract a distance of 109.96 feet to a fence corner post at the southeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Patrick E. Parker and recorded in Volume 667, Page 592, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 0°49'10" west with a fence on the east boundary line of said Parker Tract a distance of 98.28 feet to a fence corner post; Z-1624/ANA ROCCO PENA-PACE 1 f THENCE south 88°53'29" west with a fence on the north boundary line of said Parker Tract a distance of 139.20 feet to an iron pin in the middle of Riney Road; THENCE north 81°26'52" west with the middle of Riney Road a distance of 659.95 feet to an iron pin at an angle point in said road, THENCE north 27°13'51" west with the middle of Riney Road a distance of 544.54 feet to an iron pin; THENCE north 48°17'27" east a distance of 24.73 feet to a found iron pin at the southwest corner of a tract described in a deed from Robert J. Moon, at ux to Charles Melvin Cunningham and recorded in Volume 632, Page 217, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north 48°17'27" east with the southeast boundary line of said Cunningham Tract a distance of 174.94 feet to a found Iron pin at the southeast corner of said Cunningham Tract on the south right-of-way of U. S. Highway 77; THENCE south 59°34'29" east with the south right-of way of U. S. Highway 77 a distance of 251.25 feet to a found iron pin; THENCE south 58°50'46" east with the so+.ith boundary line of U. S. Highway 77 a distance of 454.97 foot to the point of beginning containing in all 14.0734 acres of land. TRACT II. BEOINNINO at a steel pin in an old fence corner at the intersection of the east boundary line of Riney Road and the south boundary line of U. S. Highway 77; THENCE south 59°22'47" east with the south right-of-way of U. S. Highway 77 a distance of 239.72 feet to a found iron pin at the northeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Robert J. Moon, et ux to Charlie Melvin Cunningham, et ux and recorded in Volume 632, Page 217, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 47°09'33" west with the north boundary line of said Cunningham Tract a distance of 126.37 feet to a found stool pin at the northwest corner of said Cunningham Tract on the east boundary line of Riney Road; THENCE north 28°38'45" west with the cast boundary line of Ri-.iey Road a distance of 237.04 feet to the point of beginning, containing in all 0.3333 acre of land, is hereb vianned changed mgricpDltu District ClassificationClassification Use Use t to o P Development under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditions: 1. A maximum of 97 dwelling units shall be constructed at the site at an overall density level of 6.9 units per acre. 2. The developer shall dedicate appropriate right-of-way ind provide necessary off-site street and drainage improvements in accordance with City of Denton requirements along half of Riney Road from Windsor Drive to Highway 77 prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Development shall generally conform with approved PD concept plan; detailed site plan approval, in addition to preliminary and final plat approval, is required before Z-1624/ANA ROCCO PENA-PACE 2 M issuance of building permits. The comprehensive and specific plans for parking, ingress-egress, landsoaping, buffering and screening must be approved before building permits are issued. 4. Development shall include an interior north/south street to be built as a standard residential street and dedi- cated as a public road with a minimum right-of-way of 40 feet. 5. Development shall include an intersectingg roadway running east/west from proposed interior nort0south street to Riney Road with a minimum right-of-way of 50 feet; location of said street to be at bend of Riney Road or a point approximately 100 feet south of bend if a traffic hazard would be created. 6. If site is not developed within four (4) years, zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A classification. Tue Zoning Vap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969 as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION II, That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Te:cas, ,end with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION 111. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings having heretofore been held y the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR ATTEST: CHAROTTY ALLEN, CITY MRFIM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i1Y Z-1624/ANA ROCCO PENA-PAOE 6`O \ to f { q ar 11 41 , tr a ti4: ` ~ C .j C t C r ~ < f C t < I itv 0 ( C E 97 TOTAL UAIIT5 a7 6.9 UNITS P". ?CRC I d„ OA I I I I v < E C C A SIAMC FAMILY DCtACHCO ' 13 l AA C G G I f! 2 PANILY USCS I! LOTS 249 UNITS I IA C ATTACHED XLSIDC1lrV.L l 1'S 54 S UNIT, I~ I N I E e ! I O G. f t o I fA LA I.r4S}rNY 14 °f OC'T SrXE£r VARKWO 1PA Inv ~r G C C rHERE ARC .E NIIIIMVM OF 1 fF3urrlc°w SPACES P" AT'ACHED RC510ENrIAL UNITS t 1 IIY,~ 1.14 1r+f ~ II14' V SCALE 1 '100' e - ov NOV,MELR10,1903 - I ---OLD--5A.U6ER--'tA4E1--._ - Tfl' ULC 12. 17,13 JAN tO, HE4 ~j N SITE PLAN 14.073 Ac. N. H. ME14E:MHEIMER SURVEY A-W cl rY ANU COUNTY or WNTON rx PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THP CITY COUNCIL. To: Denton City Council - ~E f Case No,; Z-1626 Meeting Date: Ee?,ruary 7, 1984 I GFNliRAI, LNFOPMATION Applicant: Joe llelew Box 1188 Denton, TX 76201 Status of Applicant: Prospective Developer Requested Action: Change iu zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PP) classification, Purpose; Development of the following land Uses: 1 1. Neighborhood services - 4.14 acres at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North locust 2. Multi -family - 16,1 acres hep,in- ning at the northeast corner of Windsor and North Locust (?.2 units per acre) 3. Puplox/fourplexes - 24,9 acres along north side of Windsor Prive (12 units per acre) 4. Singlo family attached garden homes - 9 acres (10 units per acre), S. Single family detached - 00 acres beginning at the southeast corner of Hercules and North Locust (SF-7 standards), 6. Floodway/open space - JO acres. Location and Size; Residential section Approximately 123 acres beginning at the northeast corner of Windsor Prive and North Lo- cust with approximately 1,700 feet (Case N 2-1626) Page Two riENERAL INFORMATION (Continued) Location and Size (continued): of frontage along the north side of Windsor Drive, approximately 2500 feet of frontage along the east side of North Locust and approximately 1,400 feet of frontage along the south side of Hercules, Neighborhood Services: 4.14 acres located at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust, Existing Land Ilse: Vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; A South - Benchmark Villas multi-family, Strickland Junior ifigh, vacant, single family; PD-25, A, SF-7 East - Windsor Place Estates Apts,, Windsor Village Apartments, Single family residential; SP-70 PD-249 PD-25A West - Evers Park, Vacant; A Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity SPECIAL INFORMATION Public Utilities: Adequate electrical, cable T.V., telephone and gas services are available to serve this site. Adequate water and sealer service is ~ also available, but the Water/ Wastewater Division has commented that if developed the proposal will utilize approximately 40-60% of the available existing capacity in the area, Overall, adequate utilities are available to serve this proposal, Drainage: The attached Development Peview Com- mittee minutes includes some specific (Case 07-1626) Page Throe SPECIAI, INFORMATION (Continued) Drainage: (continued) comments on drainage and other mat- ters. Drainage is a consideration but preliminary discussions between the develot>er's engineer and staff engineers have resulted in some plans and ideas that could be analyzed, evaluated and implemented during the platting process, Generally, no in- surmounta~le drainage problems seem to exist and staff will be available to respond to specific questions at the meeting, Transportation and Traffic: The City transportation engineer has advised the planning staff that Her- cules and Windsor Drive have adequate capacity to serve the proposed devel- opment, North Locust (F.M, 2164) does not have adequate capacity under existing conditions to serve the pro- posal at ultimate development level, Current capacity will he exceeded by approximately 48 percent under existing conditions, F.M. 2164 is part of the state highway network and may be improved and widened if future development and traffic justifies it becoming a priority project, but as with most state highways, no details or guarantees are available. Overall, this proposal provides major street access, Specifically, Windsor Drive is a secondary major arterial with 80 feet of right-of-way; North Locust is a major arterial with 120 feet of. right-of-way, Hercules' designation is not a collector street but existing right-of-way along some portions and function appears greater than standard residential streets, (Case NZ-1626) Page Four SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Transportation and Traffic (continued); The final alignment, function and construction of hell Avenue (north of Windsor) can be provided with this development, Bell Avenge Is present- ly designated as a primary major arterial by the approved thoroughfare plan. Primary major arterials trans- versing the City theoretical]), should lave it to 6 lanes with 80 to 120 feet of right-of-v.ay, The planned devel- opment concept plan shows an alignment for Bell Avenue that staff and Planning and Zoning Commission consider acceptable. Staff also discussed with the Planning and Zoning Commission the prospect of downgrading right-of-way requirements for Bell Avenue north of Windsor Drive to 60 feet, The feeling is that North Locust and Windsor Drive are already major streets and acquisition of additional right- of-way and widening of Bell south of Windsor will be a difficult process, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends 60 feet of right-of-wAy for Bell. Avenue but the Council has tho obvious alternative of modifying any portion of this request if the decision is made to approve the change in zoning. ANALYSIS The petitioner in this request is a proven developer that has worked with staff for several weeks in an attempt to develop a planned development concept that conforms to both private anO community needs and desires, Feedback from members of the Development Review Committee has been solicited both collec- tively and individual]), and though some technical issues require additional study, staff feels that the general concept is suit- able for zoning, change consideration in its present form. Comments of some Development Review Committee members are attached to this report, Because of the scale and diversity of this request, staff's approach to an analysis will. be to provide some general comments regarding the proposal as a whole and attach a standard matrix evaluation summary which rates each--- (Case AZ-1626) Page Five ANALYSIS (Continued) particular land use in accordance with applicable Development Guide policies, comprehensive, dense and diverse are three descriptions that seem to apply when one looks at this development proposal as a whole. Tio fact that a comprehensive planned development resi- dential community is being proposed is considered positive because it provides decision makers, the community and staff with an opportunity to evaluate and control a large tract of undeveloped property at once as opposed to incrementally, MAI - ity and street layout, drainage, intensity gradation, land. use compatibility, impact on public services and facilities and other critical planning factors can be studied in a more posi- tive manner when proposals of this type are submitted. However, it is important. that the scale and scope of these type of propo- sals are not allowed to overwhelm basic policies and concerns such as protection of existing neighborhood character and adja- cent property owners and ac?equate site design control. This site is located in a low intensity area, Low intensity areas as stated many times represent primary housing areas whereas moderate and high intensity areas emphasize mixed devel- opments and commercial or employment areas, respectively. This request is extremely consistent with pclicies encouraging hous- ing diversity. Conventional single family residential development constitutes approximately 47 percent of the total acreage in this request. Moderate density housing (garden homes, duplexes, fourplexes) constitutes approximately 25 percent and high density housing constitutes approximately 14 percent of the total acreage, HIGH DENSITY HOUSING ANALYSIS The fact that low density single family housing represents the bulk of the proposal is considered positive; however, concen- tration of multi-family housing in this area is substantial and the proposal increase will not conform with Development Guide policies. The Development Guide recommends that apartments be dispersed throughout the City with limited concentration in any one area. One of several specific policies governing high den- sity housing in low intensity areas provides that a puideline for concentration of apartments in one area is under 500 units with most under 200 units in any one contimious cluster, The Windsor Place Fstates Apartments (64 total units approved and 28 built) and the abutting to the Cast Windsor Village Apartments (117 total units approved) begin within 1500 feet east of the proposed 16.1 acre multi-family site. The Benchmark Villas Development (44 units) is also located along Windsor Drive south and east of the proposed multi-family section, (Case- fiZ-1626) Page Six HIGH DENSITY HOUSING ANALYSIS (Continued) It is generally felt that multi-family sites should be inter- rupted by distinctly different land use types for a considerable distance to comply with low intensity area concentration poli- cies, The petitioners fee) that the 24,9 acres of duplex- fourplex property proposed between the existing multi-family on Windsor and the proposed multi-family in this request provides an adequate anti' significant break in concentration of units in the area, Shifting the proposed multi-family further north was discussed, but this thought did not appeal to the developer and staff agrees that major street access available along the south- ern portion of the property is more desirable, Intensity gradation is also a plus with the present proposal, Aliination of the multi -family housing section altogether Is obviously not a desirable alternative from the developer's point of view but it is an option available to the City Council, If concentration in terms of the total amount of multi -family development in the area is less of a concern than the number of units proposed for this specific request, another alternative is to attach a condi- tion reducing the density and/or the amount of property reserved for apartments, A propperty owner to the north and east of the proposed multi-family Uction appeared in opposition to this request, The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the concentration issue, overall density and traffic reports on North Locust and recommended no changes to the current proposal, MO~D~ER~ATTEE, DENSITY HOUSING ANALYSIS The 24,9 acres of proposed duplex/fourplex land use was a concern from the standpoint that if not limited to duplexes, the previously discussed concentration factor becomes even more acute. Although considerably less dense than convential multi- family housing, fourplexes can be designed so that they are barely discernable from standard apartments. The petitioner addressed this concern partially by agreeing to all duplexes along the Windsor Drive frontage of the proposal and clarifying exactly how much duplex and f.ourplex development can be expected If the change is approved, Approximately 13,7 acres of duplexes and 9.2 acres of fourplexes is the precise ratio and compromise proposed by the petitioner. Again, the Planning and Zoning Commission felt that this was a reasonable response to the issue and recommends acceptance of the fourplex-duplex section as currently proposed, (Case NZ-1626) I Page Seven MODERATE DENSITY HOUSING ANALYSIS (Continued) The proposed single family attached garden homes are considered acceptable and staff feels that they add diversity to the development request, Arrangement of the units, parking, access, total yard area and other site design factors are unknown at this time, but detailed site plnn approval is available through planned development zoning. O n iu The single family housing section is proposed at SF-7 standards with attractive amenities such as landscaped entries along North Locust and cul-de-sass on the interior, The developer has agreed to set up a maintenance arrangement that satisfactorily relieves the City from any maintenance responsibilities. A brick, entry is shown off the Hercules Street frontage and n masonry and iron fence is also proposed along a portion of the perimeter, The Development Review Committee is still studying plans for internal street layout, and recommends that this issue be resolved during the platting stage, if the petition is ap- proved, Overall, there are no major problems with the proposed single family land use area that cannot be resolved during the platting process. The ten (10) acres of floodway/open space will be privately maintained and used for standard drainage purposes as well as private recreational facilities that will be available to all residents. Details of plans for this area can also be reviewed during the platting and/or specific site plan approval process. The 4,14 acres of neighborhood services proposed at the south- east corner of North Locust and Windsor Drive is consistent with the petitioner's desire to create an atmosphere of community with services available to residents, Intensity is not a prob- lem, but curb cut control, and definition of specific land uses permitted at this site is strongly recommended, Traffic and access along Windsor is an obvious concern, and the presence of Strickland JU MOr High dictates that decision makers pay close attention to what activities occur at this corner, A dry i cleaners, Laundromats, ice cream and snack shops and other ! compatible small scale retail establishments which will truly provide needed services to this area could become a welcome addition, but again, these uses should be defined and detailed site plan approval. should be required before construction is permitted, (Case N7.-1626) Page Fight. OTHER (Continued) Mr, Bob Tripp, appeared before the [Tanning and Zoning Commis- sion in strong opposition to this request and the plan to locate the neighborhood service uses at the southeast corner of locust and Windsor, Mr, Tripp also expressed opposition to the neigh- borhood service location during the staff review phase, The petitioner was also made aware of Mr. Tripp's concern and has opted to not move the neighborhood service portion of the request to the northeast corner of North Locust and Windsor as suggested by Mr, Tripp, Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission did concur with the reasoning that though signi - ficant, the neighborhood service location issue is not consi- derable enough to justify a recommendation of denial of the entire proposal, SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION With exception of North Locust, all public facilities havo adequate capacity to serve this proposal. An intensity study was done and this request does not exceed the intensity/density standard for the area based on existing land use, The compre- hensive planned development approach, housing diversity and proposed amenities are all considered positive, Negative elements include concentration of multi-family housing in this area, potential capacity problems with North Locust (17M, 2164) and the location of the 4.14 acres of neighborhood service. RECOMMFNIDATION After considering the pros and cons, the Planning and Zoning Commission felt that in its judgement, the overall character and quality of this proposal is such that the proposal should not he denied and recommended approval of Z-1626 subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1, Sixty (60) feet of right-of-way shall he dedicated for Bell Avenue, 2. Final utility layout, street alignment, ciirb c,ut and drive- way locations, and overall plans for access shall he determined during the site plan approval and/or plat processing stage. (Case 07-1626) Page Nine RECOMMENDATION (Continued) 3, The f.loodway/open space area (with exception of the drainage channol), landscaped cul-de-sacs and entries shall he privately maintained, The City of Denton must review and approve a written proposal or agreement outlining specific maintenance responsibilities beforo building pormits are issued, Duplexes fronting Windsor Drive shall he single story and must conform wlth normal City of Denton zoning ordinance requirements, 5. Single family section shall conform to SF-7 zoning ordinance standards. 6. Unless otherwise approved as part of the PD proposal, the multi-family section shall conform with MP-1 zoning ordinance standards, 7. Specific site plan approval is waived for all two family and single family land use; specific site plan approval is required for multi-family, neighborhood service and garden home sections, 8. Pedestrian bridge extended across the floodway/open space by use of dam required for the detention pond, 9. Sidewalks along both sides of hell Avenne. 10, Sidewalks constructed by developer along both sides of Windsor Drive; sidewalks along one side of all interior streots shall be ?oquired throughout the development, 11. The development shall conform with tho approved PD concept plan, 12, If 25 percent of the development, with a minimum of 5 percent single family, is not developed within five (S) years, zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) classification, ALTEPNATIVFS 1, Approve petition raith conditions _ 2. Approve petition without conditions 3, Negotiate with developer and modify request. (Case V-1626) Page 'i'on ATTACHMENTS 1, Aerial 2. Planned development concept plan 3. Reply form totals 4, Property owner list 5. Planning; and Zoning Commission minutes of January 11, 1984 0126a ad Z-1626 MULTI- FAMILY SECTION AND MODERATE DENSITY • DtYEWY Rt1IC~ COhp4?i1 D6Y6L ?KtRT RATIHO COWAUD TO POLICY POLICY CY Unacoeo~abi~ 501!61`1 11A o lliohtl a Asotocabl~ Overall density/in- Based on existing land X tensity standard is use,proposal is under- not violated standard by 30%; analysis based on existing zoning is not complete Major street access Windsor Drive and N• a is provided Locust, are major streets - high density housing also adjacent to Bell Avenue Strict site plan PD zoning is Provided X control is provided and future detailed review is Possible Existing streets and Utility services have a other public-facili- adequate capacity to ties have adequate serve the proposed capacity for all development, modes of transporta- tion and land uses, Hercules and Windsor are adequate.; North Locust capacity is, not adequate a Ap.irtments are not Existing multi-family X concentrated in one concentration is area. A guideline considerable in this for this polic\ is area particularly under 500 units with east of this site; j most under 200 units 24.9 acre duplex/4- in any one contin- plex section will uous cluEter dilute concentration to some extent Z-1626 " WLTI-F'AMM SECTION AND MODERATE DENSITY (Continued) RUIDC Coto= D'EVWPKrNT PATIHO C"AIILD TO POLICY POLICY S11Chtl H/A or Sll6bi1 Ut1~QClDrobl, ooe vre AOCO b e Aeeeoc~bl♦ Apartments that Multi-family and x buffer other high low density to the intensity uses are east and north desirable respectfully; institu- tional to the south x Desirable to have access to pedestrian bike scooter and public transporta- tion, Access or location Proposed 10 acre open x adjacent to flood- space and recreational plains and/or open area is sufficient space is desirable (Intent if `or higher density to provide for recrea- tional demand), Overall Rating Gradation, diversity x for high and moderat and negotiations density housing leading to some reduction in density and break in concen- tration are some of the positives, Concentration of multi-family housing and capacity of North Locust are negatives t . E i I ' i I E I x-1626, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE SECTION DLVCLOPIO^ OVXDE CO~pq„T DCVCLOPMLNT RA71NC COMPARED TV POLICY POLICY slightly R/A or Slightly Un*oeeotOls Unooos t Ungar A<twt+E1♦ eon D Strict site plan PD zoning provided, x control within one Present plan is Mock of existing conceptual only -and single family more informr.tion is needed on potential. users overall density/in- x tensity standard is not violated Traffic planning x insures access by co.ll•ector street or larger Sufficient green x space recreational facilities and diversity of 'parks are provided i Input into planning Input provided but X by neighborhood'or. area property owner village council is remains strongly provided opposed to location of neighborhood service I k Overall Type of users, access x plans and other details still warrant discussion, but true neighborhood services j coul'd be positive I J I ! addition to this site I i ? GM . r TAT* ML moo*, I F { AV. t a' T r 4 4w so i ~ dr. E , r v C4 6 Al t* • f' MIR, it ~R f • Jaw' l; neA r .dl ~rf 1 1 ? I~ fl, 1 4"'1 * IV e Sal -_~w0~~y4 •4 ~p *.q w* wi~+l1 ~ ~.`y~g' t i~•~ ~ S}q, ~ 9 .~..r ~f.. ".0! O.•'a V•~ w • . f I~i~_+~17.1~ i'~t{,1 1. tmM ACot$ IN IK NI 1CAN Ca tu* i ilw Crfi' J CCWm W DI MON, it1A1 . SINGLE FAMILY 1 w Acsu 1 Irk Ir-Ipy11111 r I ~i it - III ::0:bWAY ::::/OPiN SPACE may. la ACot I WIDEN HOMES IuNOU~+Awlr An.tNr,a e wu. wl ~J ICAt{ f i.. ~Y414u I{ tl a I *F MULTI-FAMILY OUPL X/A-PLEX \ rI Mb11N Nr11rNU r1 ~Y1r ~ LL.1 AC AlJ I/J'A6 ~.aNgfY 11 1 ' 1,7 AC..i+I n 1 r f ; ~ Iy f~ I I ~ 1f I~+IwtaN ~AOOC S f ' ILCEIVEL 8~0g4 OG~ 1n..N.an rurl. ~ L IA AtAt$ ..........r...... r.r....... ,..,,..r........r....r...r..........r .rr. Minutes Development Review Committee December 6, 1983 ARC Members Present; Robbie Bau hmsn, Steve Brinkman, Jerry Clark, Jackie Doy e, David Ellison, Tim Fisher, Bob Ha eman, Wayne Horsley, Ken Lamberson, Don McLaughlin, Koorosh Olyai, Pablo Rubio, Denise Spivey, Tommy Stone, Bob Ticknor XII. Review of P.D. Site Plan - Hercules and Windsor. A. Engineering 1. Channel running north-south on west side of property is not shown - need design and analysis. 2. We would like to have some detention on floodway - see Article 4.15, B (6) A and B. 3. Follow guidelines as per conversation with Engineer Brian Burke - 12-5-83. 4. Bell Ave, sizing is 60' or 100' - will be determined. 5. Please consult with Traffic, Planning and Engineering to determine Bell Ave. routing. 6, Windsor is secondary major arterial - right of way of 80}. 7, N. Locust is major arterial - right of way is 1201, 8. Prefer private rather than public alleys. 9. Natural drainway could be encouraged with the use of detention. B. Water and Sewer 1, Proposed land use is quite dense - 1046 total units. 2. Proposed street layout for single family development is not well designed with respect to looping water- lines on Yucca and Aspen Dr. 3. The 5 cul-de-sacs will generate additional dead end waterlines. 4. Utilities should not be located in the proposed alleys but in street right of way. 5. Proposed density and existing sewerline capacity needs fpirther consideration. 1 Minutes Development Review Committee Hercules and Windsor December 6, 1983 Page 2 C. Electric It Electric service available. Will service be under- ground or overhead? 2. Multi-family and 4-plex underground will be under the City of Denton General Requirements, 3, A request and legal description will be needed to abandon an easement, D. Building Inspection Brian Burke clarified that minimum separation between 4-plex buildings would be 20' and minimum separation between apartment buildings would be 301, E. Transportation Engineering No comment, F. Fire Concerned about street layout in single family section, G. Parks and Recreation 1, Would like to review landscaping plans for floodway/ open space, 2. Will not maintain landscaped medians. 3. Concerned about who will maintain alleyways, H. Lone Star Gas Service available. 1, G.T.E. Service available, J. Cox Cable Service available. K. Planning and Community Development No comment. 0010a ab/29830 PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1626 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED JoAnn Nash Barbara Maddox Box 1552 3227 Nuisache Denton, Texas Denton, Texas 566.5427 Thomas N, Peck Mrs, Eugene Blagg 3224 Huisache 3000 N. Locust Denton, Texas Denton, Texas ' Rose Brehm (Allston) Hugh Prangler, Jr, 3801 Redstsne 3226 Huisache Denton, Texas Denton, Texas J. Newton Ravzor 1204 W. University Denton, Texas 1 ~~~IgTll' n4o 7,6 U:U CJ ~ 0- hcase '~s~a n II c, ~USC ~ t 1 C cN C. -S Re, s-~nnF lj o r ±LLLLpi I G, ! 5 D l~r SCE c~='4 - 3 Cl r l f'v c 1 le i i 1 , 1- 7. w r C ~C C ti ~ I c c1 \~~~•n5 [111 5Qr:1\C. 1r ~~nYr ckv. cl J) (I 1-1,4o) I P o rA rt -a•r., J ~i(~CJ l<1 $ (kCA e l)P/1o),1 , 6'q DG C i ~ ~ C f~ ~ I c i•e 1 - ~ L f 1~~ L{/•S(. ill. ~~_il"1 ~ ~ 1 i 3a~ ti WVI~V r, Lly Soho r 5 33 C 1~ ~ ~ I ~f~r~ r\ ~ , ~e.t►~c~~~ 33~~! K~,~ sc" lax i 'v A , t'V i:k rr c 3aa?b u~sc~.c U L wio" C, Q ^ i 'YA u ~ d ~~Q he Se, ~1 ~ lu c, l'ti ~t I-ol►~, a( ' i i e, j ~o ~ r it r, l? C L- Y r r ~ i _ I. P& Z i*,U n u t'e s January 11, 19$4 Page 1 1.11 Public Bearings Mr. LaForte explained the procedure of a public hearing, A, F4-1626. Tnis-is the petitioo of Joe Belew requesting a cnanga in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (YQ) classification on a 127.05 acre tract located between Windsor Drive, North Locust and Hercules (UNAPPROVED) 'Street. ine proposed residential uses begin at the oortneast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust with .approximately 1,700 feet of frontage along the north side of Windsor Drive, approximately C,50U feet of frontage along the east side of North Locust, and approximately 1,4UO feet of frontage along the south side of Hercules Street. A proposed 4.25 acre neigh- borhood service section begins at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust. If approved, the .piannea development (PD) would per'xit the following specific land uses, 1, Neignborhooa services on 4.25 acres located at the southeast corner of Windsor Drive and North Locust t. Multi-family beginning at toe northeast corner of Windsor and North Locust (22 units per acre on 18 acres) 3. Duplexes/fourplexes along Windsor Drive ('14 units per acre on 23 acres) 4. Single family attached garden homes (10 units per acre on 9 acres) 5. Single family detached on nil acres beginning at the southeast corner of Hercules and North Locust (minim1im lot size %,uOO square feet) b. Floouway/open space on iU acres between the proposed single family detacnea and single family attached garden nomes. Mr. Juren left toe council chambers for tnis item. Mr. Ellison explained that there is a small difference in the plan which was sent in the notices, to the area property owners ana the new plan now proposed essentially the.aitferen(Ne being less density in the single family and there will be duplexes along Windsor, multi-family area will be decreased by two (2) acres. A1.90 the new plans clarify toe duplex, Sour-plex density, He explained 44 notices were mailed out, 4 returned in favor, 1 returned in tavor with a condition and 5 were returned in opposition. P & ~ Minutes nuary ll, 1984 Page Brian Burke, engineer on the project, explained the new plan will nave tower total structures on the four-plex, .He stated they nave-been working w to the staff and neignbors in making this a good project, there will be a green pelt area provided for recreation. The developer will continue to work with statf, hopefully tollowing the general concept plan. Bennie Snider, (4U8 Mimosa) stated he has purchased tnirty-three acres of land west of this project across North Locust and plans a development of single family, multi-family and duplexes, also North texas Savings and Loan is doing a project in the area. He is in favor of Mr. 6elew's project and feels it will be of benefit to the community, Jo Nash, (1319 Stuart) owns fifteen acres adjacent to the project, stated she feels Joe Belew does very good work always and is in savor. She suggestea the idea of a grocery store for the neighborhood services corner, Jerry Gage (315 Magnolia) stated Denton Savings Association has worked with Joe Belew and his,work and dedication is always of fine quality. tie said a number of builders are presently looking for lots and he also would favor a grocery store at the neighborhood services section. Jim Neal, builder in Pilot Point, feels this is a very good project as Denton needs more lots for builders interested in building in the Denton area. Bill Brady, president of Denton Savings and Loan, stated they are financing the project and are also a joint. venturer in the project, the SF-7 lots are much needed in Lenton. ine county nas proposed a new single-family bond. issue for first time home buyers of which Denton Savings and Loan is administering and he feels this would go along with this project and greatly benefit Lenton residents: Bob Tripp, owns property west of Locust across from the neighbornood services section, stated.he feels this particular section would be detrimental to the future development of his property and also probably toe land gust south of this section. He feels it woulo cause problems for the foot trattic in toe Strickland Junior High School area. 1' & Z, ~ninures January 11, 1964 Page 4 'ire Windsor/Locust intersection trattic is already heavy and the project would cause more problems. He feels ii it were placed on the northeast corner the vehicular trattic would be less and he would then not object and neitner would-mrs, nlagg ltne aojacent property owner at .the south) and the area would be better situated with respect to the toot traffic, he turther commented that the right-of-way to cut Windsor thru to Highway 77 was given to the city by his family at no charge, others were paid for their land, He stated he would be very disappointed it this is approved. Jeri Veeder (3503'Huisache)•aSKed for a clarification on the number of multi-Family ana duplexes, Mr, Ellison explained there would be 94 duplexes 188 total units; kb tour-plexes and 354 total multi-family •uni is , ors, veeaer reels the density is too high for the area and it could be a bao situation tot Strickland Junior High School, she also has some concerns for the tloodinb ir the area. Mr. Larorte questioned it staff was aware of Mr. lripps objection and was it discussed with Mr. below or his representatives. Mr. Ellison explained yes, but apparently Mr. below did not feel he could accomodate his suggestion. He stated typically you get a cleaners, launaermat and other small scale service type uses. He explained there are adequate public facilities, however; this project will be using 4U-6U percent of the capacity available. He said today it appears North Locust does have some capacity problems but Hercules and Windsor are adequate, Nortn Locust, proposed bell and Windsor serve this project as major street access tot traffic and a to toot right-of-way is proposed for dell Avenue. Jerry Clark explained the greenbelt area is approximately lU acres in size, the channel will be improved by the developers with a detention system ana should help with the present tlooding in the Huisache area and he does not see any problems with the effects of the new development tot any additional flooding problems. Mr. Larorte questioned it the exact size of the greenrelt nas been determined. P &,Z Minutes January 11, 1984 Page 5 Mr, Clark ex lamed it would be very close to 10 acres which would be adequate yet is determined on the depth of toe chanilei to b%e cut, Mr, Sidor asked how a detention pond is designed for the excess water, Mr, Clark explained there are two ways to design, one being with pipes inground to drain water into the ground area. Koorosh Olyai said he would answer any questions the commissioners might have with regard to his memorandum on toe project which they have, Mr, LaForte said iris question is if the city were to get all 80 foot right-of-way dedicated for Bell Avenue then there could be a secondary arterial street, but if only a 0 foot right-of-way is obtained there could never be a secondary arterial street even if we needed one. Not sure wiiy city staff is concerned about the amount of right-of-way, should be a concern of the developer, ' Mr, Olyai stated Bell Avenue is a primary arterial but doesn't function as such, traffic count siiows to be less toan Windsor, the problem area is not in the proposed development area but south of it. Mr. LaForte stated he is not sure why t-fr. Olyai is recommending only a 60 foot right-of-way when we could get an 80 foot right-of-way and it seems it would be more appropriate for future development. He stated tie does not follow Mr, Olyai's logic, Mr,Olyai stated the traffic counts 811OW Bell cannot be classified in the same class as Carroll or Windsor, Mr, Ellison said with regard to tdr, Olyai's traffic counts, if this project does develop North Locust will be above capacity, Maintenance is a state responsibil- ity as it is a farm to market road. Overall single family is consistent with existing development .n the area, landscaping plans are all positive factors, tiie garden homes section will be a good buffer, adequate utilities are in ttie area and except for North Locust traffic the proposal is acceptable, P & Z Minutes January 11, 1984 Page b Mr. Ellison continued explaining with regard to the neignuorhood services, staff agrees with some of Mr, Tripps concerns on the access but does not totally agrse that the southeast corner is anK different from the northeast corner, The neighborhood services is a 4.25 .acres and not such a negative factor that the whale project sitould be turned down. He suggested there ,should be some discussion with regard 'to curb cuts and sidewalks. Overall acceptable and staff recommends approval with tt:e following conditions: 1. Sixty (e0) feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Bell Avenue, 2. Final utility layout, street alignment, curb cut and driveway locations, and overall plans for access shall be determined during the site plan approval and/or plat processing stage. 3. Tne floodway/open space area (with exception of the drainage channel), landscaped cul-de-sacs and entries shall be pri- vately maintained, Tito City of Denton must review and approve a written proposal or agreement outlining specific maintenance responsibilities before building permits are issued, 4. Duplexes fronting Windsor Drive shall be single story and must conform'witti normal City of Denton zoning ordinance requirements. 5. Single family section shall conform to SF-7 zoning ordinance standards, 6. Unless otherwise approved as part of the PD proposal, the multi-family section shall conform with MF-1 zoning ordinance standards. 7. Specific site plan approval is waived for all two family and singgle family land use; specific site plan approval is required for multi-family, neighborhood service and garden home sections, 8. Pedestrian bridge extended across the floodway/open space by use of dam required for the detention pond, 9. Sidewalks along uotn sides of Bell A •!nue, 10, Sidewalks constructed by developer along bout sides of Windsor Drive; sidewalks along one side of ail interior streets shall oe required throughout the development. P & z Minutes January 11, 1984 Page 7 11, Tne development shall conform with the approved Pp concept plan, 12. If 25 percent of the development, with a minimum of 5 percent single family, is nut developed within five (S) years, zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) classification. Mr. Laporte commented sidewalks are already on Bell Avenue but not Windsor in the area. Mr, Ellison stated subdivisioii regulations require sidewalks go in on one side of the.street in a project, Mr, LaPorte commented maybe we could get them on the same side of the street rather than piecemeal on each side, Air. Ellison maid the developer can be requested to-put sidewalks on either side. Mr. LaPorte asked Mr. Bellew if that would be okay, Mr, Belew responded yes and he would put sidewalks on both sides, Mr, LaPorte teianked him and commented that would be extremely generous and knows it would be mucii appreciated, Mr, Burke stated he feels that the neighborhood services located on the southeast corner is the best location for the traffic situation, With•regard to the drainage, until more s,,udies are made he is not sure exactly tio*e muca acreage will be required for floodway to be retained and this area will be used for recreation, Chairman announced the public nearing closed. Mr. LaPorte commented lie understands Mr. Tripp concerhs and thanked iiim for the donation of the property to the city, however, he said he is in favor of the project and the planned development as a wliole, tue city needs the SP-7 lots, Mr. Sidor questioned if it is possible to sever part of the proposed planned development, Mr. Watkins answered yes, Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of G-1616, seconded by Mr, Pearson. P 6 Z Minutes January 11, 1984 Page $ Mr. Sidor said he would like to amend the motion to exclude the neighborhood services section, Mr, Eseue secotided the motion, Mr, Pearson commented Chat a lot of work, time and effort has obviously gone into tlsis project and he feels it should remain a complete concept, Mr, S'J'Aor said lie feels some consideration should be given to Mr, Tripp. Mr. LaPorte commented ne thinks the commission siiould not try to piecemeal areas when there is a good complete concept at hand to be considered, Mr. Pearson said he feels the neighborhood services will not have any detrimental effects, Vote was called on the motion to sever the neighborhood services, Motion failed 3-2 (Sidor and Escue) Vote was called on the ori4inal motion witnout the amendment, motion carried 5-0. Mr. Escue made a motion to reconsider Z-1626 to include ttie following conditions. i. Sixty (60) feet of right-of-way shall be dedi.-ated for Bell Avenue. 2. Final utility layout, street alignment, curb cut and driveway locations, and overall plans for access shall be determined during the site plan approval and/or plat processing stage. 3. The fioodway/open space area (with exception of the drainage channel), landsca ed cul-de-sacs and entries shall be private~y maiutained'. The City of Denton must review and approve a written proposal or agreement outlining specific maintenance responsibilities before building permits are issued. 4. Duplexes fronting Windsor Drive small De single story and must conform with normal City of Denton zoning ordinance requirements, 5. Single family section skull conform to SP-7 zoning ordinance standards, P 4 Z Minutes January '11, 1984 Rage 9 6. Unless otherwise approved as part of the PD proposal, the muiti•family section shall eonfolm with MF-l zoning ordinance standards, 7. Specific site plan approval is waived for all two family and sinb>le family land use; specific site plan approval is required for multi-family, neighborhood service and garden home sections, 8. Pedestrian bridge extended across the floodway/open space by use of dam required for the detention pond,' Sidewalks along both sides of Bell Avenue. 10. Sidewalks coustructed'by developer along both sides of Windsor Drive; sidewalks along one side of all interior streets shall be required throughout the development. 11. Tne development shall conform with the approved PD concept plan. 12. If 25 percent of tiie development, witu a minimum of 0 5 percent single family, is not developed within five (5) years, zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) classification. Seconded by Mr, Pearson. Vote was called, motion LC_ arried 5.0. Mr. Juren returned to i,is seat. 111, Public Hearings B. Z-1627. This is the petition of Mike Neblett requesting a change in zoning from single family (SF-.7) to the two family (2-F) classification on a proposed 80'x143.5' parcel beginning adjacent and east of Bradley Street approximately 150 feet north of tue intersection of Bradley and Scripture Streets, and adjacent and north of 1922 Scripture Street. Mr, Ellison explained 15 notices were mailed to pproperty owners within 200 feet of tree subject property, A reply forms were returned in favor and 2 returned opposed. He continued explaining the subject property is one lot in excess of a normal single family lot size and the petitioner is replatting to two lots to guild a duplex on the excess area. No. AN ORDINANCE AM'ENDINO THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 9-L, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROAKATELY 130.5 ACRES OF LAND 0:7 OF THE B.B,B, b C.R.R. COMPANY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 186 DENT(:jh COUNTY TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARfNG AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follcv- ing described property, to-wit: TRACT 1: All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the M.B. & C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No. 186 in the City and County of Denton, Texas; the said tract being all of a called 100.695 acre tract and part of a called 40.891 a:re tract, both tracts described in deed from J. Newton Razor to Jesse Newton Razor, at al recorded in Volume $41, Page 654 Lr.d 655 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNINO for the northwest corner of the tract being descri'.ed herein, at the northwest corner of the said 100.69$ acre tract said ?106'4n t being in the east right-of-way line of F.M. Highvay No. (North Locust Street) at its intersection with the north '.tine of the said B.B.B. & C.R.R. Survey; THENCE south 01°29' west with the said right-of-way line a distance of 2526.52 feet to an angle point in the said line; THENCE south 00023' west continuing with the said right-of-vay line, and passing the southwest corner of the said 100.695 acre tract and continuing along the same course, in all, a tc-Al distance of 1071.95 feet to a point for corner in the north L~ne of Windsor Drive; THENCE south 89°35' east with the north line of Windsor D- -.,,,e 1780.8 feet to a point in the east line of the above mentic_,ed 40.891 acre tract; THENCE north 01°O1' east with the said east line ant passing the northeast corner of the said 40.891 acre tract and t.i6 southeast corner of the said 100.695 acre tract and continuing in the same course, in all, a total of 1024.87 feet to the mosi east,triy northeast corner of the said tract; THENCE north 87°57' west a distance of 312.29 feet to a reentrant corner of the said 100.695 acre tract; THENCE north 01°22' east with the east line of the said tract a distance of 2560.58 feet to the northeast corner of the said tract in the north line of the said B.B.B. & C.R.R. Survey; THENCE north 89°25' west with the north line of the said 100.c45 acre tract and the north line of the said Survey a distance of 1603.42 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing. 1.c.36 acres of land. miss TRACT 21 All that certain tract or parcal of land tiituatsd in e B. 6 C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract No, 186 an the City and County of Denton, Texas; the said tract being a part of the called 40.891 acre tract described in the deed from J. Newton Razor to Jesse Newton Razor, at al recorded in Volume 541, Page 655 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said trnnt being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING for the southwest corner of the tract being; described herein, at the southwest corner of the said 40.891 acre tract, said point being in the east right-of-way line of F.M. Highway No. 2164 (North Locust Street); THENCE south 89°19' east with the south line of the said tract a distance of 433.38 feet to a point in the west line of the tract described in the deed from J. Newton Razor to the Denton Independent School District recorded in Volume 535, Page 212 of the said Deed Records; THENCE north 00°59' east with the west line of the said DISD tract a distance of 415.27 feet to a point in the south line of Windsor Drive; THENCE north 89°35' west with the south line of Windsor Drive a distance of 437.72 feet to a point in the east right-of-way line of the said F.M. 2164, same being the west line of the said 40.891 acre tract; THENCE south 00°23' vast with the said right-of-way line a distance of 413.23 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 4.14 acres of land. is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification Use to planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditions and specificationsi 1. Sixty (60) feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Bell Avenue. 2. Final utility layout, street alignment, curb cut and driveway locations, and overall plans for access shall be determined during the situ plan approval and/or plat processing stage. 3. The floodway/open space area (with exception of the drainage channel), landscaped eul-de-sacs and entries shall be privately maintained. The City of Denton must review and approve a written proposal or agreement outlining specific maintenance responsibilities before building permits are issued. 4. Duplexes fronting Windsor Drive shall be single story and must conform with normal City of Denton zoning ordinance requirements. S. Single family section shall conform to SF-7 zoning ordinance standards. 6. Unless otherwise approved as part of the PD proposal, the multi-family section shall conform with MF-1 zoning ordinance standards. Z 7. Specific $it$ plan approval is waived for all two family and single family land use; specific site plan approval is required for multifamily, neighborhood service and garden home sections. 8. Pedestrian bridge extended across the floodwsy/open space by use of dam required for the detention pond. 9. Sidewalks along both sides of Bell Avenue. 10. Sidewalks constructed by developer along both sides of Windsor Drive; sidewalks along one side of all interior streets shall be required throughout the development. ll. The development shall conform with the approved PD concept plan. 12. If 25 percent of the development, with a minimum of 5 percent single family, is not developed within five (S), years zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) classification. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69.1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications. SECTION 11, That the City Council of ,:he City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is 1.1 accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of pro;uoting the general welfare of the City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration among other things for the character of the district and ?or its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTIGN 111. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1984. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DF.NTON, TE {AS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENT0N,yTE'AS BY: MIIIGYAtI TI1I I!! 1 1144 A"A IM Vol 00 60 GO NM~rPI • 1,~~ 11 1 tm 1 wow" M "NNW. "A" I 1 WNW FAANLY I N.GMA L iE I 14 .r , I • IC I I PL000WAY/OPIN EPACt 10 .au OA"%R M0Mt6 Iwwu~+wlll ~nwGel r..1«.w i A .dlA I V Ha •y ~Vr w. ILY 4X ' -71A Nr ! L 11,1 .GMtA 1t, 1. GG.MVI m i ! If ►.f .~r.►tJf i f! ! I `7 i S 111 f"" i ?InE10~A OG£~O F i~r ~ ; ttfllvEL, •1 f{ • g ilnlruMr w. ~ I n.l.i...«rr..rln•niw rn•n•nin•n•Yrnlr.iVlwr.w•Yrnll............. Y.~.IYI ~11.Ir. rani............... i PLANNING AND ZONINQ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To; Denton city council I Case No.: Z-1627 Meeting Date: February 7, 1984 GENERAL INFOR ATION Applicant: Mike Neblett 527 Bradley P.O. Box 1066 Denton, Texas 76201 Status of Applicant: Prospective Developer, Requested Action: Change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to the t:wo-family (2-F) classification Purpose: Development of a duplex structure on the back portion of 1922 Scripture (Existing lot is 143,51X2501; it would have to be replatted to allow the development of an additional struc- ture,) Location and Size: If a replat is approved, an 8O'x143,51 lot would be created adjacent and east of Bradley Street between Scripture and Sena Existing Land User Single family residential on the front portion of the existing lot; dilap- idated storage building on the back portion of the property Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family; SF-7 South - Single family; SF-7 East - Single family, multi-family, office; SF-7, 0 West - Single family, two family; SF-7, 2F Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity (Case #Z-1627) ' page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Public Utilities; Adequate streets and utilities are in pla,7s and available for extension to this site. ZONING HISTORY AND BACKGROUND In September, 1978, Mr. Mike Neblett petitioned for a change in zoning from SF-7 to the multi-family (MF-R) classification (Z-1360) on a 15,000 square foot lot located adjacent and west of Bradley street across from the site in this request. The Planning and Zoning Commission was provided with a staff report which expressed concerns about the prospect of fourplex use in this older area and fear of a harmful precedent at its meeting of October 18, 1978, Fifteen (15) reply forms were mailed to property owners within 200 feet; seven (7) were returned in favor and two (2) were returned in opposition when the 1978 request was considered. Staff advised the Commission of its opinion that neighborhood sentiment should play an important role in consideration of Z-1360. The Planning and Zoning Commission apparently had misgivings about MF-R zoning and development in this area. The petitioner agreed to downgrade his proposal to the two-family (2-F) classification. The two-family proposal was recommended for approval by the planning and Zoning Commission by a vote of 6-1. The City Council approved the two-family (2-F) request on November 7, 1978. An attractive yet somewhat imposing two-family residence (in comparison with typical structures in the area) was built at the site of 2-1360. The address is 527 Bradley and the petitioner does reside at the site, Information in the Z--1360 file indicates that Mr, Neblett advised the Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, staff and surrounding property owners of particular plans for design of the residence. Staff cannot substantiate the claim, but a property owner within 200 feet who opposed the 1978 request and is opposed to the present request has informed staff that Mr. Neblett failed to develop a single story structure as promised when Z-1360 was considered, The opposing property owner has intimated that, though beautiful. the residence at 527 Bradley is out of character with surrounding residences and, again, different from what was offered during the change in zoning procedure. Planned development (PD) zoning was not approved in 1978 and the residence of 527 Bradley was built in accordance with City standards. (Case 11x--1627) Pape 3 ANALYSIS The petitioner is attempting to replat an existing single family tract with frontage along both scripture and Bradley into two lots which could conceivably meet minimum standards for both single family and two family construction, it this request is approved, a duplex will be constructed on the back portion or Bradley Street portion of the tract, The two story duplex existing directly across Bradley was made possible when a 1978 zoning change was approved. This area is one of the older neighborhoods in the city which has maintained a residential character that is still predominantly single family. After considering comments of two or three opponents to this request and analyzing the pros and cons, the Planning and Zoning commission resolved that an additional duplex at the proposed site would not negatively impact the character of the area or perpetuate zoning instability. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval of Z-1627 by a vote of 6-0. ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1, Aerial 2. Reply form totals 3. Property owner list 4. Planning and Zoning commission minutes of January 11, 1984. i r "y1 l Who, A r d 0 ~WA , I law \ j ti, w/.K n dp r . s q _JL qw y R v I .l N. yy ..e / t 'f W M1 . " ` s M 1`\ .I t roc a low • J I, Y Mir a„ INK PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FOMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1627 IN FAVOR IS' OPPOSITION UNDECIDED James R., Neblett Fthel R, Woodby 2003 Sena Clarence T, WoodbY Denton, Texas 1913 Sena -Denton, Texas Ernest L, Simnson 382-'2210 716 Ector Denton, Texas 387-1312 Albert E. Harpool 1002 Bonnie Brae Denton, Texas 382-6149 Ir,1 ) ^ 1 1 1 y r r ~ f 1 ` 1 C 1 a ~ W a3 (I i W 1 I ~ {l 1t 11 r G De-,)-Ndsz, > C 50.1 G r 11 1' c Lo c rl 1 'L, ~ ~ (',i L M 1 r r Mot O rr III V r ~ I ~o-a3 ooU 1 , ^ r l 1 r ~ i , i P & 4 Minutes January 11, 1984 Page 9 b, Unless otherwise approved as part of tiis PD proposal, the multi.-family section snall conform with MF-1 zoning ordinance standards, 7. Specific site plan approval is waived for all two family and silb le family land use; specific site plan approval is required for multi-family, neignborliood service and garden home sections, 8. Pedestrian bridge extended across the floodway/open space by use of dam required for the detention pond.- 9. Sidewalks along both sides of bell Avenue, 10. Sidewalks coustructed'by developer along both sides of Windsor Drl.ve; sidewalks along one side of all interior streets shall be required throughout the development, 11. Trie development shall conform with the approved PD concept plan, 12, If 25 percent of the development, with a minimum of 5 percent single family, is not developed within five (5) years, zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) classification, Seconded by Mr, Pearson, Vote was called, motion carried 5-0. Mr. Juren returned to ills seat, 111. Public' Hearings B,1 Z-1627, This is the' petition of Mike Neblett requesting a change in zoning from single family (SF-,7) to the two family (2-F) classification on a proposed 80'x143,5' parcel beginning adjacent and east of Bradley Street (UNAPPROVED)' approximately 150' feet north of ti-te intersection of Bradley and Scripture Streets, and adjacent and north of 1922 Scripture Street, Mr, Ellison ex lained 15 notices were mailed to roperty owners within 200 feet of the subject property, 4 reply forms were returned in favor and 2 returned opposed, Be continued explaining the subject property is one lot in excess of a normal single family lot size and the petitioner is replatting to two to is to build a duplex on the excess area. P & Z Minutes January li, 1984 Page lit Miller Davidge,. attorney for i-like 11oblett, explained that the proposal is for a duplex wit" 1500 square feet on each side and one'iueing for Mr, Neblett's personal home, The plan is for a two story,strvcture of wuico he believes would ue no.problem if it were a single family zoning and should not be of any concern being a duplex structure, he sees no uiffereuce. He commenced toe 1978 request for a two family residence did not cause several zoning requests to arise in the neighborhood and he does not feel this one will either, Mr. Neblett has gone to the neighborhood to speak to families and explained his plans. One reply form was changed by Mr, Meadows to be an appproval of the change in zoning, Mr, Davidge feels it will be an attractive addition to the area and knows Mr, Neblett will do it in the best of taste and there- fore would like to see this petition for the zoning mange approved uy the commission, Mark Moore (Realtor aiid liaison from the Board of Realtors to the Planning and Zoning Commission) speaking in favor of the request said he does not see how any problems would arise with a number of zoning changes being requested in the area as this i,s the last available lot remaining in the area, Ethel Woodby (1913 Sena) in opposition stated the previous speaker was very wrong, there are several vacant lots in the area. She stated she has lived in the neighborhood over thirty years and sne is very much opposed to a two-story duplex looKin$ down over aer backyard and to any further spot zoning in the area, Mr. Juren questioned if her opposition is more particularly the fact that the structure is to be a two-story that she is against, Mrs. Woodby stated no the spot zoning is also .a concern for 'the neighborhood overall. Mr. Ellison explained the differences of Cate overall impact for two-family and single family as being very insignificant and the duplex itself is not considered a problem. Staff's recommendation of denial is very weak however, there is some concern that this might be a signal to the neignboriiood and cause some instability, Mr, LaForte questioned if the request in 1976 was for a planned development zoning classification, Mr, Ellison answered no, was a straight Cwo-family (duplex) zoning request. P ~ x flittut'es ,luhuary ll, 1984 Page 1',l Mrs Ellison responding to a question from Mr, Sidor stated whether the request is for a single family or two family it will still go through a platting procedure, Mr. Sidor questioned Mr. Neblett as to whether or not he presently owned the subject property, Mr. Neblett said no but is in contract to purchase, Mr. Davidge stated the Neblett family lives next door to the presently zoned duplex property and Mike Neblett (petitioner) has lived there in the neighborhood for 36 years and plans to be there,man more with plans of being in tite new structure whether it is a duplex or single family. Again lie stared a single family zonin* would allow for a two-story structure, Mr. Neblett will ouild the structure to afford the most privacy to ois .own family and the neighboring uack yards, In his opinion tree duplex being owner occupied would be a plus and nothing he has done in the area in the past or plans to do would be inconsistent with the neighborhood, Chairman announced the public hearing closed. Mr, Juren made the comment he does not see any problems with a two-story structure and feels the new addition to the neighborhood would be an attractive addition to the area. Mr, Juren made u motion to approve Z-1627, and was seconded by Mr, Pearson, vote was called, motion carried C. z-1628. This is the petition of George Hopkins and arro'1 Goen requesting a change in zoning from a*ri- cultural (A) to the single family (SF-16) classsfi.cation on a 14.619 acre parcel beginning approximately 160 feet north of Hopkins Drive, Mr. Ellison explained there were 23 notices mailed out to property owners witnin 200 feet, 2 reply forms were returned in favor and 5 were returned opposed, Georb)e Hopkins (petitioner) stated his plans are for SF-lb lots and explained he wants to be consistent with tiie neignooruood and feels this project will do so. He said me is astounded that there would be any opposition from toe ueiguuortiood and maybe tie should withdraw this request and come back in witii a multi-family project-, He explained the SF-16 lots to be tue highest use in tie single family zoning classification trlat can be put in, N0, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0,263 ACRE OF LAND OUT OF THE ROB3RT BEAUMONT SURVEY, ANSTRACT NO. 31, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS;. AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION 1. The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follow- ing described property, to-wits All that certain uract or parcel of land situated in the Robert Beaumont Survey, Abvtract No. 31, City and County of Denton, Texas, being a part of a tract described in a deed from Sena A. Wright, at vir to W. C. Wright on May 6, 19400 recorded in Volume 284, Page 104, Dead Records and part of a tract described in a deed from William W. Wright to Wm. Crow Wright on February 15 1955, recorded in Volume , Page . , Deed Records, and ali of a tract described in a eed from qm- T4. Wright, at ux to William Crow Wright, at ux, on June 25, 1941, recorded in Voiume 290 Page 567, Deed Records of Denton County, and being more ful{y described as follows; BEGIM41NO at the northeast corner of said tract from William W. Wright to William Crow Wright recorded in Volume 290, Page 567, Deed Records which is also the northwest corner of a tract froc J. T. Thompson to Senatir Wright recorded in Volume 282, Page 473, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE south a distance of 80.0 feet to a corner on the east boundary line of said tract recorded in Volume 284, Page 104, Deed Records of Denton County; THENCE west a distance of 143.5 feet to a corner on the east boundary line of a tract described in a deed from W. C. Wright, at ux to City of Denton on February 15, 1955; THENCE north with the east boundary line of said City of Denton tract a distance of 80.0 feet to a corner on the north boundary line of said tract recorded on February 15, 1955 in the Deed Records of Denton County; THENCE east o distance of 143.5 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 0.263 acre of land, more or less. is hereby changed from Single-family "SF-7" District Classifica- tion Use to Two-Family "2-F" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of. January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-i, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. Z-1627/MIKE NEBLETT/PACE 1 SECTION 17., That the City Council of tha Cityy of Denton, Texas> hereby finds that such change is in acoordanos with a gomprehensive p an for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonabla consideration, among other things or the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and maximumbenefit encouraging to the most the City o f p ria Dent OnCeTexas, and itlsenditifor the SECTION III. That this ordinance shall be SSin full force and effect heretofore bean and by the Planning land Zoning he~aringsehxvie p Commission andng the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1984. RICHARD 0. TE~m CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LECAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: 2-1627/111KE NEBLETT/PAGE 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COl1NCII To: Denton City Council Case No. Z-1628 kleeting Date; February 71 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants: George Hopkins and Carroll Goon Box 485 Denton, Texas 76201 Status of Applicants: Owner Chan ,e in woning from agricultural. (A) Requostod Action: to t U single family (SF-36) classifi- cation Purpose: 4 . . 4 ' , Location and Size: X4,619 acres beginning approximately 160 feet north of Hopkins Prive l:,xisting Land Use, Vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Light industrial us es; L l; South - Single family SF-10 Fast - Vacant; PD-6 for single family residential use West - Timberidge Townhouse Addition, office, Jonathan's Private Club; Ph-30, GP, LI the fringe of a moderate Denton Development Guide: Area Is on node intensity Z-1628 Page 2 T APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The following regulations are applicable in SF-16 zoning districts: Minimum Lot Area: 16,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width: 100 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 120 feet Maximum Building Coverage: 35 percent Minimum Front Yard Setback: 35 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback: 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback.: 10 feet ANALYSIS The proposed SF-16 zoning classification for the 14,619 acre parcel in question is considered acceptable. Light industrial, townhouse, office and general retail zoning and land use exist in this area but single family zoning and land use abuts this tract to the west and south. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1628, ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Reply form totals 3. Property owner list 4. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of January 11, 1954 0109g gc I~w M pp S .4 via a OWL ' q ~ r~- 6 10. Al; • w %b ,1 y PROPERTY OWNER UPLY FORMS CITy 2-1628 IN FA17OR IN OPPOSITION un ECIDED Richard R, Compton Fred Graham 1203 Hopkins 1015 Hopkins Denton,Texas Denton, Texas H, T1, Foster 1011 Hopkins Denton, Texas Bill Mi.dgett 1040 Shady Oaks Denton, Texas Herman E, Nolen 1205 Hopkins Denton, Texas rir, & Mrs. Stanley Kirby 1209 Hopkins Denton, Texas W, H. Harris 3.115 Hopkins Denton, Texas Dennis Iaccisano 1018 Hopkins Denton, Texas .LI-1c~a~ 7 (oaxj . Gc 0 - a ~ 1 nr, 11 v Fa 101N ~IUJ err ' C,4 x ~+1CZSrt r Y~~ V. 11c, r. k ~t. ~ NCtirr+S 1115 + I f ~ 03 ~ IC_, n U~ 111 • a 9 L-I C'_ c ' Amm bJQ ro J'\ , a III, G J 10 P, D I 1 tc ao a 1-~ Lt \ r k ~J f'E'rr` (r d2 ~ `1 L~. ~Jrn ~ r ~ . r ~ 7 .J• 10 I l I I C7 1 I . 1 P & Z Minutes January 11, 1984 Page 11 S idor Mr; Ellison responding to a question from Mr, stated whether the request is for a single family or two .family it will still go through a platting procedure. Mr, Sidor questioned-Mr. Neblett as to whether or not he presently owned the subject property. Mr. Neblett said no but is in contract to purchase. w Mr. Davidge stated the Neblett family lives next door to the presently zoned duplex property and Mike Neblett (petitioner) has lived there in the neighborhood for 36 years and plans to be there manyy more with plans of being in the new structure whather'it is a duplex or single family. Again he stated a single family zoning would allow for a two-story structure, Mr. Neblett will build the structure to afford the most privacy to his own family and the neighboring back yards. In his opinion tr,e duplex,being owner occupied wou''.d be a ,plus and nothing he has done in the .area in the past or plans to do would be inconsistent with the neighborhood. Chairman announced the public bearing closed., Mr. Juren made the comment he does not see any problems with a two-story structure and feels the new addition to the neighborhood would be an attractive addition to the area, Mr. Juren made a motion to approve Z-1627, and was seconded by Mr. Pearson, vote was called, motion carried 6-0. C. Z-1628. This is the petition of George Hopkins and arro 1 Goer requesting a change in zoning from e ri- cultural (A) to the single family (SF-16) classification on a 14,619 acre parcel beginning approximately 160 feet north of Hopkins Drive. (UNAPPROVED) Mr. Ellison explained there were 23 notices mailed out to property owners within 200 feet, 2 reply forms were returned in favor and 5 were returned opposed, Geor e Hopkins (petitioner) stated his plans are for SF-1 lots and explained he wants to be consistent with tine neighborhood and feels this project will do so. He said tie is 88tounded that there w uld be any opposition from the neignooroood and mayrie .e should withdraw this request and come back in witti a multi-family project, lie explained the SF .16 lots to be toe highest use in tiie single family zoning classification that can be put in, P Z Minutes January 11, 1984 Page 12 Mr, Sidor asked what the access to the area would be, Mr, Hopkins explained the surroundingg area properties and stated that Travis Street would be the main access. Stanley Kirby (1209 Hopkins) came forward and stated he would be in favor of the single family zoning of SF-16. John Walker (1206 Hopkins) stated he would be in favor of this single family classification request. Max Libowitz stated lie represented the Township 11 Homeowners Association and is in favor of a SF-16 classification, Ricuard Compton (1203 Hopkins) stated he is in favor of the proposal, No one spoke in opposition Jerry Clark stated he has no problem with the development but wanted to make everyone aware of twe fact that there is a fair amount of flooding on Duncan Street and Willowsprings in the nearby area and the drainage will be a topic of concern. Mr. Ellison stated the Development Review Committee recommends approval, Public hearing closed Mr. Sidor made a motion to approve Z-1628, seconded by 1 Mr, Juren. Vote was called, motion carried 6-0. D. -Z--1629. This is the petition of'Tom M. Stingley request- ing a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to tape two family (2-F) classification on a 4.220 acru parcel beginning adjacent and north of Paisley Street, approxi- mately 100 feet crest of the intersection of Mulkey and Paisley Streets. Mr. Ellison explained there were 44 notices mailed to property owners .witnin 200 feet, 1 reply form was returned in favor and 9 were returned opposed, Tom Stingley, petitioner, explained the surrounding property use acid stated lie feels like the duplexes are the highest and best use. He said the density is to ue thirteen duplex Lots (26 units) on 4.220 acres which is less tnan single family very large lots and will not affect the traffic significantly in the area. He feels Denton is in need of more duplex lots, lie 'stated he would fence the wtiole addition off if necessary. 140, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDIUNCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE N0. 69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 14,619 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE R, H, HOPKINS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1694, DENTON PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED KERLIN! ANO COUNTY G MAE1'FECAND TIVE HORE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS! SECTION 1. The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follow- ing described property, to-wit! y land oftuthed R n H the Hopkins All Dentonat Deron certain Cotact unty or parcel a of Su-eve Abstract No. 1 94, and being more particularly described as follows, to-wit; BEGINNING at the northwest corner of the Hopkins Survey, said point being the southwest corner of the Wm. Teague Survey; THENCE south 87°52'10" east 1324.64 feet with the north line of the Hopkins Survey, a corner; THENCE south 02°21' west 442,2 feet, more or less, a corner, same being the northeast corner of Block 5 of the Hopkins Hills Addition to the City of Denton; THENCE north 87°39' west 400 feet, a corner, same being. the northwest corner of said Block 51 THENCE south 02°21' west 50 feet, a corner, in the west line of said Block 5 THENCE north wes4cornerebeing the northwest corneriof of the Hopkins s Survey said Block 2 of the Hopkins Hills Addition to the City- of Denton, Texas; THENCE north 01°03'40" east 492.20 feet to the place of beginning and containing 14.619 acres of land, more or less. is hereby changed from Agricultural ''A" District Classification Use under otheiCompr hensive l'Zonin1g OrDistrict dinance of the iCityoof aDenton, Texas, The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION 11. That the City Council of tho Cite of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a colapreheusive Z-1628/HOPKINS & GOEN/PAGE 1 lan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the p City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable oonsideration, Among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, sod with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, the and Denton, Texas, and itsncitizens. maximum cbanefitg to the most the City of p SECTION III. That this ordinance shall be pp in full force and effect after its herstpofore and a PlanningiAred nd Rublic, commission and the t a Cnotice ity thoreof 1 of the City of Denton, Texas, 1984. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of jUL;Wu 0, SMART, HATUR, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY, Z•1628/!{OPKINS L GOGN/PAGE 2 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1636 Meeting Date: February 7, 3,984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Randy Axtell 1013 North Carroll Denton, Texas 76201 Status of Applicant: Prospective Occupant Requested Action: Change in zoning from office (0) to planned development (PD) classificatio Purpose: Conversion of building to accommodate an art gallery, framing and supply establishment. Location and Size: 1100 North Locust Existing Land Use: Vacant building and parking Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family, multi-family, two family, office; O, MF-l South - Single family, two family, multi-family, office; 0, MF-1 East - Single family, two family, multi-family; 0, MF-1 West - Multi - family, single family, two family; 0 Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity (Case MZ-1636) Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Public Facilities; Adequate utilities, streets and drain- age are all in place. Locust and Sawyer Streets are both improved; however, Sawyer Street is narrower than existing standards, Background; The building at 1100 North Locust was built in 1915 and has been utilized in many ways through the years, Recently, the building sat dormant for more than six (6) months and consequently lost its legal nonconforming status, The building is currently vacant following the departure of a religious organi- zation which last utilized the structure as a "Way Station", The building has also accommodated a wholesale/retail coffee service, and was reportedly the site of a neigh- borhood grocery store. Parkingi Many older structures with legal non- conforming status are used for various purposes without the provision of paved parking per current City of Denton standards. After the non- conforming status was lost because of a six month lapse, four (4) paved parking spaces had to be provided on site to accommodate the "Way Sta- tion". The proposed use requires seven (7) parking spaces. There is a city ordinance which permits the use of parking off-site if the spaces are within 500 feet of the subject prop- erty, Texas Woman's University (Denton Baptist Center) has allowed the petitioner to lease three (3) spaces on a yearly basis in a lot at the corner of Sawyer and Oakland Avenue. The lot is within 500 feet of 1100 N, Locust and both the building inspection division and legal depart- ment have approved the lease agreement. (Case M2-1636) Page 3 SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Parking (continuedIn summary, only four (4) paved park- ing spaces will be available on-site for the proposed use or any future uses; however, the petitioner has worked out what appears to be a satis- factory arrangement which allows him to provide the required seven (7) spaces if the petition is approved. ANALYSIS The building at 1100 North Locust has accommodated several land uses in the past. The property is currently zoned office but due to its former non-conforming status it appears that it has never been utilized for office purposes, If the building had not sat dormant for more than six (6) months and the noncon- forming status had been maintained, it is conceivable that a change in zoning would have not been required for the proposed land use. Four (4) on site parking spaces are less than the required seven (7) spaces but it is unlikely that any use beyond single family or two family would be able to meet current parking standards. It is felt that on site parking has been developed to the full- est capability and the petitioner's agreement with T.W.U. Appears satisfactory, An owner of property in the area voiced strong opposition to this request with parking cited as the principal problem during the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing, Past problems with on-street parking and driveways being blocked were described for the Commission with no specific emphasis on the site in question, The Planning and Zoning Commission expressed sympathy for those affected by the parking problem in the area in question, but concluded that the petitioner in this request has done as much as can reasonably be expected to provide on-site parking for his proposed business. The petitioner is proposing to relocate his Art Alley establish- ment (currently located at 1821 N, Elm) to the site in question. Given the history of the site and the fact that office zoning presently exists, the proposal appears quite rea- sonable. The petitioner has submitted a planned development (PD) request and is amiable to the idea of limiting the use to an art gallery, framing and supply establishment only. r (Case NZ-1636) Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1636 with the following condition; The land use permitted at the site shall be limited to an art gallery, framing and supply establishment; certificates of occupancy shall not be issued for any other uses without an amendment to the planned development approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition with condition, 2, Approve petition without condition, 3, Approve petition with additional conditions, 4. Deny petition. ATTACMIENTS 1, Aerial 2. Site Plan 3, Lease Agreement 4, Reply form totals S. Property owner list 6, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of January 11, 1984 ja 0096j 001:112111 lap FLI tiff Jiy 4r • _ ..T , •*.Y' tee h 4tA 8 e 4io 416 - tom, Fr ~ t.•> i , + nR J I +I F 'c oij ~lip* jA dlr., s a. i,~. sir ~~•y , ~A up Y ;AW 'TM7L ' e; Y iX•" • ~4 1k~y~ L'd•' ry YJ 0 0' ` - 'AM w - - w IA Ica PARKING .AgEk 4 SPACES ~ a Cis ' lU W At. -01 .t A . r I "r y RIrT'A1L aREA ~W~ CA a t s V t I C Locus'#" d I 7-1 +I I N ~ I~ 11 FORM REii ART ALLEY 4k- f2ao1 FidAr'111d6 ~ CP,U~Y'A~'sUNPLIS~ a SAY I _ti , TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY LEASE AGREV= The-Texas Woman's University agrees to lease to RANDY AXTM three (3) parking spaces in the lot at the corner of Sawyer and Oakland Avenue. This lease begins December 1, 1983, and terminates August 31, 19840 and may be renewed on a yearly basis with the mutual agreement of both parties. The first year's rent shall be $54.00 and re-negotiated each year thereafter. Rent is payable at the beginning of each year. Either party may terminate this agreement with thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. FOR TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY: Robert 0. 8e ield Vice President for Fiscal Affairs December 60 1983 Randy Axtel, a Decem"r 6, 83 4pe ARTALLE'r 2928 1821 N. ELM PH, 817.383.4372 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 19 ,L i iltd PAY 0 THE ORDER OF z LE+D DOLLARS iCt w rr. "w, tt. w tMLL M I W M co tM M,.OI. Adaftw h Bl ~O e3 , ART ALLEY i ~ E PROPERTY OVNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1636 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Henry Shoopman 1004 N, Locust Denton, Texas Ms, Hiram J. Friedsam 1403 Kendolph Denton, Texas Ms, G,. A, Lloyd Ill Sawyer Denton, Texa C. E. Lowrey 1117 Austin Dentori, Texas 382-5943 { ~l i 1_ K ~aCJc c~ II . 8 ~ ~I 13 Iv LR pus-} ~ 4 rs p , Isov 3 ' Oe,r, 4 ors i1 Cl Iv e ~ I iSJ11 1 ~ 1~ "L) '~'~T I) lA f. a I 1 u 3 ~n13 SCOY~vko ~a~5 LJGf U~ ~~1~R+1 } CG I~ 3- y c( I\i S C ti1~, . ('1 E c~ ~Fi I'll I IC ~ f ~ ~ 1 SG 111G t~ s a b~~,.e Nvis a I b 11 L.a ~u sl c\ w c e ~ 1 C ~ r r a- ~'i I p r Y 61J, a --T H Q U i i ~11 1 II i„ o CI I 11 1 C i1U 1 Y 1 CS f r i e- r C • Y -7 (n f 1 a, ~ ~ c~ ~,a ~ r I n e ~O w e. l Law GkX ti i a ti , Lo t,u ,4. 1~~ 11'1~s. C t C u. s ~r, `l4an~le. 6-1 a~efi P &.Z Minutes January 1.1 , 1984 Page 13 stov stating Autumn soke in singleofamily. Mr. Ellison stated overall the' density is not a problem as 14r, Stingley said but lie disagrees that there is not diversified housing in tiie area, to the north along Mulkey he pointed out locations of multi-family which nas been approved but not yet developed and explained the area could be changed drastically with what is presently zoned but. not yet in the process of construction. Development Review Committee recommends denial of Z-1629. area Mr, Pearson said lie knows of otiier duplex lots in the Mulkey. best use Mr, nStingley stated and again oufeels this is l of character lt for the not he for the area. Public hearing closed Mrs Pearson commented lie could not see breaking up the single family area, Mr, Escue made a motion to recommend denial of Z-1629, seconded by Ms. Cole, vote was called and motion carried 6-0. E.1 Z-163b. This is the petition of Randy Axtell requesting; a. change in zoning from office (0) to the planned devel- opment (PD) classification at 1100 North Locust Street, if approved, the planned development (PD) would permit (UNAPPROVED) tiie establishment of a framing, gallery and art supply establishment (Art Alley), Mr. Ellison explained this petition is requested in order to relocate a business known as Art Alley to this site. Recently the wilding set dormant for six months and consequently lost its legal non-conforming status, Twenty-one notices were mailed to property owners in the area, 3 reply forms were returned in favor and zero were returned in opposition, Randy Axtell stated he will renovate the building and put in his establisiied uusiness at this location as new owner of the building. P &.Z Minutes January 11, 1984 Page 14 MiKe Crawford (1112 N. Locust) said he did not respond to his notice but does have some concern with regard to the parking in the 'area, The single family houses in the neighborhood have been greatly affected with terrific parking problems due to new apartments and there are more currently under construction, Mr. Ellison explained the parking requirements difference between office and general retail designation in response to questions 'ny Mr, Pearson and Mr, .Sidor, Mr, Ellison explained that Sawyer is a narrow street and. arKing is a problem but tiie paved parking lot is an mprovoment, Development. Review Committee recommends approval of '-1636. Mr, Axtell commented he was sorry about the parking problems but does not-think his ~usiness will affect the parking situation muco more thgn what is presently- occurring. Public hearing closed. Mr, LaForte said he feels that the parking situation is a very good objection, however he is not sure that this business would cause much more problem than what is present, Mr, Sidor made a motion to approve Z-1636 with the condition that the land use permitted at the site shall be limited to an art gallery, framing and supply establishment; certificates of occupancy shall not be issued for any other uses without an amendment to toe planned development approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Seconded by Mr, Pearson, motion carried 6-0, F. Approval of the final replat of part of lots 1 and 2, First Installment of the Carroll ParK Addition, Mr, Ellison stated the plat is in order and the Development Review Committee recommends approval, Mr, Escue made a motion to approve the replat, seconded by Mr, Pearson, motioned carried 0-0, NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DEMON, TEXAS ORDINANCES OF ITHEWCITY O FPTDENTON, TLXA3,PEBY ORDINANCEE NO ~D64-OF AND AS MAP LOCUST STREET, DENTON COUNTY, STEXAS; AND PLMORE TPARTICOULARLYH ES RIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follow- ing described property, to-wit; All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being a part of the B.B.B. b C. Ry. Company Survey, Scrip No. 111, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the east side of North Locust Street in said City of Denton in the south line of a lot sold by A. E. Tabor and wife to F. D. Cox by deed recorded in Volume 145, Page 532 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north with the east side of North Locust Street 25 feet to corner; THENCE east 125 feet to corner; THENCE south 25 feet to corner; THENCE west with the south line of said lot so r.onveyod by Tabor and wife to Cox 125 feet, to the place of beginning, and being the same tract of land described in a deed from G. W. Martin to Byrdie Martin Wilson dated April 21, 1945, and recorded in Volume 114, Page 176 of the Deed Records of Denton County, 'texas, is hereby changed from Office "0" District Classification Use to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas with the following conditions and specifications: 1. The land use permitted at the site shall be limited to an art gallery, framing and supply establishment; certifi- cates of occupancy shall not be issued for any other uses without an amendment to the planned development approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications. SECTION 11. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in dccotidance with a comprehensive ,Ian for the ?urpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among II Z-1636/RANDY AXTELL/PAGE l other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular us$$, and with a view to protecting human lives, conserving the value of the pbuildings' n the and maximum cbenefitgto the most the City of pDenton t Texas e and its citizens. SECTION IIi- That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning after sgio ndua the notice Citythereof~ of the City of Denton, Texas, 1984, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; , CITY OF DENVON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: Z-1636/RANDY AXTELI/PAGE 2 i lC i ~ + i I _ dAStkIN~, ,A0.F.A , 4 SPACES h~ r s i I' S ~ RETR1'~ A9Ef, W 3 I `f f E f a Locu+i,4 fry } ' i I 1 t ~k I CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM `L'O: The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: 11111 Angelo DATE: January 31, 1984 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 4-7 OF THE ANIMAL. CONTROL ORDINANCE I have nttnched for your consideration a copy of n proposed ordinance which amends Section 4-7 of the Animal Control Ordinance by redefining stray animal violations, t,s you may recall, this item well included with the ordinance establishing an animal registration program and was tabled at the Council Meeting of Jnnuary t7, 1984. The current definition of stray animals has created some effectiveness problems for our Animal Control Officers in the enforcement of this provision, As currently stated, an animal must be "unrestrained and wander onto public property or on to the property of another" before a violation is committed, In order to enforce this provision, our officers must actually observe the animal off of the owner's property. Unless the complainant is willing to press charges and testify in court, our offi- cers are unable to take any action although the animal is still unre- strained, Needless to say, the workload in thin division does not allow the officers the luxury of sitting and waiting for the animal to wander off of the owner's property, In order to eliminate this problem and to increase the effectiveness of our enforcement activities, we have proposed amending the Animal Control. Ordinance to establish what is known as a leash law, This amendment will. require that an animal be restrained by a leash, fence, or enclosed structure at all times regardless of whose property the animal may be on, Thus, our officers will be able to take action on these complaints without the testimony of the complainant and without having to observe the animal wandering off of the rwner's property, During the last Council Meeting several questions were raised during the discussion of this item, These questions included the npplirability of the ordinance to cats, the effect on animals trained to stay in their own yards, the legality of such a provision, and the justification of the ordinance for revenue purposes. The following is a brief response to these concerns, Although cats appear to be less of a problem than dogs, there is still a need to attempt to control the activities of the cat population, 1%1hile cats do not pose a great threat in terms of attacking humans, they still create problems relative to nuisance and public health concerns, AMENDMENT TO SF(TION 4-7 OF THE ANIMAL. CONTROL ORDINANCE January 31, 1984 Page Two Cat problems are handled on a complaint only basis and capture activities are attempted through the placing of trapa in the general area of the complaint, The proposed amendment will have very little, if any, effect on the handling of cat problems, In relation to the ordinance's effect on those nnimals trained to stay in their own yard, we do not feel that any such animal exist, Given the fact that dogs lack the ability to reason, it is very easy for an animal to be distracted from its training, especially if the owner is not present, Evan the best trained dog will leave its own property if tempted with the right distraction, such as a child riding a bicycle, a jogger running down the street, or a bitch in heat, Thus, any unre- strained animal could be a threat to public health, safety, and property in addition to creating a nuisance problem. The City Attorney has offered his opinion as to the legality of this provision, stating that it is a very common practice in other commu- nities, In fact, Denton is one of the few cities in the area that does not have a leash law, It was indicated at the last meeting that this issue was another attempt by the City to increase revenues, It is true that there should be some increase due to an increased number of impoundments and citations, however, this is not the purpose of the ordinance, The primary objective of this ordinance is to give our officers an ordinance that they can enforce without the need for testimony from a third party or without having to determine the ownership of the property an animal may be on, In essence, this amendment is aimed solely at increasing the effective- ness and efficiency of our Animnl Control. Division in their mission to provide animal control services to the City of Denton. Should you have any comments or questions on this item, please let us know, r K"- Bill. Angelo Attachment: Proposed Ordinance N0. OF T DENTON ("ANIMALS") S1 TO OF THE CITY CHAPTER ORDINANCES ORDINANCE OF AMENDING REQUIRE STRUCTURE; ANIMALS BE RESTRAINED BY A LEASH, FENCE OR ENCLOSED STRUCTURE! PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED ($200.00) THER DO.LLLARS AND D VII LATO AN EFFE CT T' PDATEDING FOR A SEVERABILITY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section 4-7 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas be amended to read as follows: "Section 4-7. Animals Running at Large Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for an owner of any dog, cat, horse, pony,. mule, cattle, goat, sheep, pig, sow or other livestock to fail to restrain said animal by leash, fenced yard or enclosed structure. For purposes of this section, an offense, as herein defined, occurs without regard to any . cupable mental state of the owner." SECTION 11. That.Sections 4-24 through 4-30 of Chapter 4 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton are hereby amended to reserve said sections for future use as follows: "Sections 4-24 through 4.30. Reserved. SECTION III. That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding "'wo Hundred Dollars ($200.00); and edch day and every day that the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in addition to and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be available at law and equity. SECTION IV. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effeotive fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of 1484. S CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST, CRAROTTE ALLEN MY SECKETM CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 254(d)(3) OF CHAPTER 2$ OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DEN 0 , TEXAS TO PROVIDE FOR AN ADDITIONAL. NONVOTING MEMBER TO SERVE ON THE UTILITY ACCOUNT REVIEW COMMITTEE; REPEALINO ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITHi AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY OR.DAINSc SECTION I. That Section 25-6(d)(3) of Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordi- nances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to read as follows: 11(3) If the customer is unable to meet these conditions or if he/she has defaulted on a deferred agreement, he/she will be referred to a "utility account review committee" for further action. This committee will be composed of the city manager, city attorney, finance director and utility director. Additionally, one citizen representative selected and appointed by the city manager will serve as a nonvoting member of the committee. If committee members,are unable to attend the meeting, they may send a designated representative in their place, The utility account review committee is authorized to develop a deferred payment agreement beyond the six (6) month period but could not extend beyond twelve (12) months. Neither the customer service . department nor the utility account review ,oumJ.ttee will have the authority to waive all or any portion of the utility statement owing to the city except when an error in billing has occurred. Any account that is delinquent will be referred to the city attorney for collection, and appropriate reports regarding the account's credit rating will be processed." SECTION 11. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinance become affective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict. SECTION' 111. That this ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and, approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1484. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: UKARIMII~ ALLEN, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS • APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORD: C. J. TAYLOR, JR,, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DE}'TON, TEXAS By~ 61, CI':Y COUNCIL AGENDA PACK-UP SUMKAItY SHEET MEETING DATE. February 7, 1984 SUBJECT., Adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 1014,4 acres of land located south of Highway 380 and west of I-35 (z-1610) SUMMARY: Adoption of the accompanying ordinance and service plan will finally accomplish annexation of this property. The Planning and Community Development Department is currently processing a subdivision plat and zoning petition on approximately 100-150 acres of land, which is primarily located in the area proposed for annexation. ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt the ordinance and service plan. ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to adopt ordinance and service plan 2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan 3. Table SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental Budgets RECOMMENDATION: The planning and zoning Commission recommends approval. EXHIBITS:. 1. Ordinance 2. Service Plan 3. Map le It Charles S. Watkins Senior Planner 0125g 40, AN ORf`7NANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO Tkr CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: MNG ALL THAT LOT, TRACT Olt PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF&?PROXIMATELY 1014,4 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN T,f+E COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE B.S,B. 1 C,R.R. Co. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 192, W. BRYAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 140, J. PERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1040, A,' COBERLY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1542 AND M J. SCOTT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1222, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS: CLASSIFYING THE SANE AS AGRICULTURAL "A' DISTRICT PROPERTY: kND DECL:.RING kl: r,FFECTIVE DkTF, , WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at j regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Taxan, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texast AM WHEUM, an opportunity Was afforded, At a puDliC hearing held for chat purpose on the 110" day of Oc =r rr IM in the Council Chamber for all interested persons to state tnelr views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided oy this . Ordinance: and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, At%a public nearing held for that purpose on the / Y day of t.„~~r 196? in the Council Chamber for all interested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinances and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been puDlishe6 in full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its elfective elate, and after the puolic hearingst NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THF. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FER.EBY ORDAIWSI SECTION I• That the -'Mere., naf:er described tract of land De, ano the same nereay annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is is ..ade nereby a pa:: o: sand City and the :and and the .resent and future :nhac.tants thereof snail oe entitled to e11 the ..gnts and pr. ._eges o: other c...:ens of said , and scall oe cound c} . the acts and c:d.sarnces of t,a.d C.ty now in effect o: :n.cn, ma'.. :,E:oaf td: Le enactec anc nee 'rCCe:t~ 5:.:ated Ce S. ;aCt :C a.. sna_ :ea: _ts :at_ :axes .e', leC v t the City, The tract of land nereoy annexed 10 described as follows, to-wit; All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the B.B.B. 6 C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 192, w, Aryan Survey, Abstract No. 146, J,,perry Survey, Abstract No, 1040, h, Coberly Survey, Aostrict No. 1542 and the J. Scott Survey, Abstract No. 1222 and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by Ordinance tio, 75.28, caid point being the intersection of the north right-o; way line 'of Jim Christal Road with the west right-of-way 11ne of trio G.c. a S.F, Railroad; THENCE south 89036110" west along the north right-of-way line of said Jim Christal Road, same being said present city limits, a distance of 648.3 feet co a point for a corner; THENCE north 21451' west along said present city limits a distance of 746,5 feet to a point for a cornet; THENCE north 68109' east along said present city lia.its a distance of o00 _°ee: to a point for a corner in one west right-of-way line 0! said G.C. I S.F. Railroad; :HENCE north 21051' west along the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 65-43, same being the went • right-of-way of said G.C. i S.F. Railroad &,'distance of 2928.iS feet to a point for a corner, said point lying 300 feet south of the centerline of U. S. Highway 380; THENCE north 88150' west along the present city limits as establisned by Ordinance No. 69-40, 300 feet solath of and parallel with the centerline of U. Highway 380, a distance of approximately 2941.11 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE south 0101114" east along the present City limits as established by Ordinance No, 79.63, a distance of 216.08 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE north 88.4515:" west along said present city limits a distance of 300 feet to a point for a corner; ':HENCE north along said present city limits a distance of 2222.67 feet to a ptint.for a corner; THENCE north 88150' west along the present •c:ty limits as established, by Ordinance No. 69-40, 300 feet south of and parallel w•itn the centerline of U. -S. Highway 380, a distance o: approximately 1561,11 feet to a point for a corner; °THENCE soutn along the present city limits, as estaolisned by Ordinance No, 82-52, 1250 feet oast 0' and parallel with the centerline of Underwood Road a cistance cf approximately 3700 feet to a point for a corner said point lying in the centerline of .i^ ChStal n0 ad; -"-NC-7 westerly along said ;relent city limits rame being the • Cehtt e:l:,he of `Jim C.^,::stal Road a distance of approximately 12° feet to a point for a corner; 3: .!,E 'Eder„ ..f..: ai 6: :a.._.5„!0 3"E ...filan ce a 'C: y: THEt,,CE east along said present city limits a distance of 6099 toot to a point for a corner; THENC~o noa point for rth & on9 said id present city limiW A distance of 3912.06 toot THENCE noe north 305 W36 feet 10' a $Opoint tt Along a cor Present city limits a THENCE north 21'51, west along the present city limits as established by Ordinance No, 65-43 a distance of 32.5 feet to the ?lace of b6ginning and containing 1014,4 aates of land, more or leas. ' sEGT~o__ The above described property is nereby Classified as Agricul- tural "A" District and shall to appear on the official toning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is heraoy amended accordingly. SECTION " i. Tnis ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Introduced before the City Council on thtzm day of 1~E f, 19 PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day 0! RI R 0. STZ'WkXTj MAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; CcARLOTTE ALLEN', CI7Y SECRETARY CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LZGAL FORMi C. J, TAYLOR, JR „ CITY ATTORNEY C17Y OF DV -6N, TEXAS BY: l~ e 1 1 PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED ARIA CITY OF MTON TEXAS 0 WHEREAS, Article 970% as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a a,s amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service; I, Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, • and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C, Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at City rates, from existing city. lines on the effective date of annexation, :,nd thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13.06 ol appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. • E, Refuse Collection (1) The same reg-.lar refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area withl.n one month after the effective date of annexation, Servios Plan Annexed Areas Page two 0 F, Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,) will begin on the effective date of annexation, (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, 1. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, pavks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and, facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. I ~ Servioe Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street noute signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation, II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as,, (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics, • The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning iL% the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other, areas of the city. I i , R d Z` • I M .CSR mor b M t i",' • ~ • • • • A~ klnn R ' t :;i ~ l'' ~81W l~nd ,,w • „l~r / '`^~io,~ ~ r •.,i M + Flo ` • ♦ •4~I r Rd~ ~r fKf' • " " • o I Chin Rd, • 4 11 35 • r• Rd ; • Branch Rd „ Id I a ~ )DENT 0 N 1 1 '3 li 1 • ♦ pop 39,e74 'Op 454 f • ' 1' T, ' •,1 • JJJ ( j11 { yt Ir' is 1i I . 4E~II f, 71 ro 'eJ 44k$on Rd. • ti a • ~a .J r • O ♦ ' pA e ~ ~ • 1'i ii C did, 10 a A 380' 4. ' T..• N, 2,3 40' 4 11101- .9-A&a A% LM hri>ttal 'Rd 1~.., Ski I•• Rd J' nI It 161 1 .IRI"f ~I .,a R r • 7 o m• C o I• d,.;1 M !,12 2. it V Led 1 JA Yx Rd. coot. Rd. 6 4 ° U FAS ' $o Ore RdW 2449 4 M, Livel Rd J • Y / o ai t Ivel ~Rd, JEroncn Kee ^•e L or, r1 w " 3r7 Cor r~lh Al Cr • ♦ IBC . 1) 7;J e . Grru k Ad.~` ' jr ?fir u •h II PI T CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-VP SUMMARY S=T MEETING DATE;: February 7, 1984 SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 43,9 acres of land located west of I-35 West and south or the existing city limit line (z-1611) SUMMARY: Adoption of the accompanying ordinance and service plan will finally accomplish annexation of this property. ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt tho ordinance and service plan. ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES. ALTERNATIVES: 1, Move to adopt ordinanoe,and service plan 2, Disapprove ordinance and service plan 3, Table SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental Budgets RECOMMENDATION: The F-lanning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance 2, Service Plan 3, Map Charles S, Watkins Senior Planner 0125g • AN O'.DINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, B£INO ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 47.9 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BLINO SITVATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE 0. BREWSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT 140, S6, DENTON COUNTY, C`A IFYING DECLARING HAN £SAME CT7S D"RICULTVRAL A. DISTRICT PROPERTY, WUEPJAS, the. request fog annexation was introduced at a regular meetznq of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texasi and wHEREAS, an opportunity was affordeo, at o public nearing held for that purpose on the I P L$'day of i 1983 in the Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance, and W'eZPEAS, an opportunity was affordeo, at a public nearing neld !or that purpose on the / day of /~c ? 983 in the Council Chambers for all interested persons -to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexatio,h provided by this ordinance, and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City -of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings, NOWTHZREFOR.T., TEE COUNCIL OF TJJX CITY OF DENTON, TIXAS, =P.EBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same .s hereby annexed to the City-o! Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and !uture inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rignts and privileges of other citizens of said City and snarl De bound oy the acts and ordinances o! said now in effect cr wmicn may • herea!ter De enacted and the propertp situated there:., De s,:-cc: to and snag' Gear :s tro.ata cart of .e taxes .cried act .z^•d eroc hnhex ec s descr.::,ec as A14 that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated survey, 'Denton, Abstract No.o56Teand, oeingeiMorrarparticularly BrewsterCounty oeseribed as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits said point lying at tne e described' in Ordinance of t 69-40 vest othe aSoutheast corner the of tract to the $ceni+rline point of I; H. 3Iv5~ing S00 feet tract west c of b and l Ordinance No, 60- f TIU CE south 22601102" west along said present oity limits as established by ordinance 69-40 and $00 feet west of and parallel s of I.H.35w, a distance of 142'!.56 feet to a entarlin with the C for a Deed Records of Denton County, Ttx&sl Pagen36Siof the T UNCE north 64136'10" west along the south boundary line of said fO1208.31 -.set to a n r of said tractpoint for. a corner, same being the sovthwest c THE14CT north 2142' east along the west boundary line of, said tract city llmce s of iestablished by Ordinance ! No. a 80 corner in the present 1%1:14CE south 84644' east along the present city I.Imits a distance of 1681.22 feet to the place of osginning and containing ;3,5 acres of land, more or less. M-0-V X. The above oescribed property is hereby classified as Agricul. rural `A" %District and snail to appear on the official .oning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION III, This ordinance shall be effective Immediately upon its passage. Introduced before the City Council on the 2Nr day of r+. 19 Z3 Ij PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of ,.,:-:nFD 0, T«K/+nT, 1Ijk'YOF Ci:Y' Gf DE: TON, TZXAS V... w. III V. , S. Y.. 'M PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service e adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: I, Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards, B, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Stater (1) dater for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) properties in the annexed areas will be conne„ted to sewer lines in accordance with article 13.061 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. . E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation, Service Plan Annexed Areas age two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)I will begin on the eff~otive date of annexation, (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of ';he city, G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, H, Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive data of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric Distribution • (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three 0 L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately S months after the effective date of annexation. IT. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. M Ail, I,Z ,«1n N J i J 'w' v t I e,. is 1'~„' • "44 ' • /K~ ' lye ~~`1 A~RPQR1' • ,7A \`'"'",',~"A~~ r ~''~ii~ , I'~~( I ~ V I ? • r ? IS,'. ,a,,' y~ ' w~. N J j' , .rT > t j~,,,,,,~"(~ • / ~ ~'T t ' 1 ' .•a r,~i'•r ?s 1 ~ n yi~,,^', tl~ , A Y~ ~~./1 `yi.. jt~~' ~y I. ,M'y.. i V' y.•1,,:. I+f •4'.t ~•r"y Trw r ( r is • ,.~"'R.ty, "',1. ~M ..may ~M'L.`, 1~. ! p.; .~•SM , lk, 40 1 ..n. 1 els" 4. : 1611 . -sip ! yin- r • ! 1 V ' 1 .rOT ail 1t :.tub w n I r . 4.. y, `1L'~ ' . 1 \1',u •al Lvl'Y`~~"I :M y ♦1 r,ril t> i " ! 1 J l''yl 4t. ' i.r. y , .U^ 7. y~ .w i s h•. ,'~~1!. ti )at' . MV. '~'l`►1~ + Jt~',w4 Alp ,i ll. ♦~f~.l`+. .Y ♦11 1, ~.1' tt y. '.'y t r~~//.. i. I yT♦ f• 1 . i, , l 1.• . ` ,O.Q'y a1. '\..y. dry, a•y ~ v J• 1 0.. ♦ t ~ • • , , Ski. ~ J ' . t. • • ' 70- IF, sf r, ' it 'i i• 04, • W V a 5419, CITY COUNCIL AQENDA BACK-UP SUMMAay BURET ME4TINQ DATE: February 7, 1984 SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 367 acres of bind located between I-35 West and the Santa Fe Railroad (Z-1612) SUM2$ARY: Adoption of one of the accompanying ordinances and service plan will finally accomplish annexacion of this property, The Planning and Community Development Department has received two phone calls concerning development of a mobile home park on 32 acres of land belonging to Dr. Singlaub located in the area proposed for annexation on the east side of Bonnie Brae across from the Solar Way Addition. ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt ordinance and service plan. ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Move to adopt ordinance and service plan 2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan 3. Table SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental Budgets RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval. EXHIBITS: 1, ordinance #1 and map 2, ordinance #2 and map 3. Ordinance #3 and map 4. Servico Plan A Charles Watk ns senior Planner 01'25g ¢ri r N0. AN ORDINA= ANNEXING A TRACT Of LAND CONTIGUOUS AND AWACXNT TO THE CITY Of OENTON, TXXASI SEING ALL THAT LOT, TPJICT OR PMICEL Of LAND CONSISTING Of OPROXIMATXLY 367 ACM Of LAND LYING AND SEING SITOATXD IN TUX COUNTY OF DENTON# STATE Of TEXAS AND $XING PART OF THE 0. BREMSTER SURVEY, A"TRACT NO, S6# A. THOMFKINS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1246# A. MXCXKAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. $11 AND TBE J, COMONSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 400, DENTON COUNTY, TEXASI CLASSIFYING TEE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT PROPERTY) AND DECLARING AN BFFECTIV8 OATS. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introdueea at a regular meeting of the City Council of the city of oenton, Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas) and WRL"REAS# an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held I*V that purpose on the 11'0' day of A Ar.4oe # 1903 in the Council Chambers for all Interested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinances and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public nearing held for tnat purpose on the day of ".r ,,e v , 1983 in the council Chamoers for all ~rested p One to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation proviaed by this Ordinanoet avid WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least one time In the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings) NOW, TBEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the sane is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof snall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other oiti:ens of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or whion may hereafter 0e enacted and tna property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and oeing situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the 0. Brewster Survey# Abstract No. $6, A. Thompkins Survey, Abstract No. 1246, A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. $21 and the J. 5dmonson Survey, Abstract No. 400 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 60.40, said point lying in the Intersection of the west right-of-way line of the O,C. G S.F. Railroad with the south boundary line of the A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. $21) • THENCE west along the south ooundary line of said Hickman Survey, a distance 09 1730 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner, same asing the southwest corner of the said Hickman Survey) T4EINC3 nor h along the west oouneary line of the said Hickman Survey, a aistanea of 4130 feet, mure or lass, to a point for a corner lyin; in an east and West county roar (Roselawn)) THENCE west along the center of said county road A distance of 1910 test, mots or less, to a point for a corner in tae west boundary line of the J, Edmoason Survey, Abstract No, 400 and the east boundary lint of the W. Sajvis Survey, Abstract No, 1174) TUNCE north along the east boundary line of W. Sajvis Survey, a distance of 1100 feet, More or less, to a lnt for a corner, $ame being the northeast corner of tat W. Savis Survey, said point also lying in an east and west county road) TELNCE west along the north boundary line of the w, Sajvis Survey, sable being in the said county toad a distance of 1$00 feet, more or less, to a point for a cornet in tea present city limits as established by Ordinance No, 69.40 Tract II, Said point also lying 500 feet east of and perpendicular to the centerline of I.0.35W) TMCE north 26•S1'40" east along said present City lisitS 1244,96 feet, sort or less, to a point TUNCt north 20060112" east along said peasant city limits a distance of 3827,79 feet, Mots or less, tv a point tot a oorner in the west right-of-way line of the G.C, i S..'. kailroadi TR'ENCE southfaatetl along the present city limits AS established by Ordinance No. 60-40 sass being the west tight-of-way lane at the G,C. i SIP, Railroad a distance of 9373,85 feet, more or ,less, to the place ad beginning and Containing 367 acres ad land, acct or less. SECTION Ir, The above described property is hereby classified as Agricul- tural "A" District and $hall to appear on the official zoning map of, the City ~of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION III. This Ordinance.$hall be etftotive immediately upor. its passage, Into duped b tore the City Council on the 202 day of ~P , 19 . PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on '.h1 day of RICHMW 0. , ,R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST, CHARLOTTI ALLEN, CITY CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS • APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM, C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r 1V V 0 M R 1~ 13~! f ~3, ,/1. ~'I i } ' i ! • 1 • + ~ ~ • ts04p~pi I ~ ~ii 1.~• • 3 • 4j t• • 1 A 2~ lit' -OW 213 • jwGe~ ~ ~i~ .i it~F$ ~ ' 't i s w •oll~ie el M' l l i • J' }ii I t . ',~`~•Q?i'r~ii lo III' I ` ?Uk / • tt. * ~ ~ ! A ' aim" * C o t s 4. ii~ 1 „ 2 2 : t ;•yii', ; > a t! .w ~ Diu. . :.;•ar:i! r' 1 ~AI ,iil • 1' .1. f7 * ':a:;:'.,., ItIM IG • to W.LIv*I '110 • fi is i};,~r' • i S~ ! . • ~ ~ ~ 1 IOn[Y► a 0116 :et 041 ~:i' t • y • Z. 16 VIP h :L35/; ' p Iskery i;;oell Ilk III • . ee 'PILOT ,N09 i' y ~oAnsoe ~~i. ai,` ' ~r I } y', • Pal •O . °a /Old 13 ! /Altom 8.6 4t Ads d Rd. • Crew ,K, t • 11C^ s F %doo r • ~.°",:',i,'' o: { A I Oh - .;sue ~ l • r~ 'rte ~ r ~i h I iE'''* e • l'r K• A5• 11f*~•}11 4 =r 4. • • y • • Mi0•t •r : ARGYLE --'l • •Re~ • • .ii POP 443 •~Mi4d r Old JUS11n d. r s • • . . s \ r\ hi# 1•fi Sam__0aVIS.Pt N0. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING A1, THAT LOT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 307 ACRES b£ LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF "'94 AND BEING PART OF THE 0. BRUSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. THOMPRINS SURVEY, ABSTRAAT NO. 1246, A. HICXHAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. $21 ANA THE J. EDMONSON SURV'dY, ABSTRACT N0. 400, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texan, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texan; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at public hearing held for that purpose on the day of , 1984 in the Council Chambers for all ntntt#rrested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the day of 1984 in the Council Chambers for All Ynt& *sted persons to hate their • views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published In full at least one time in the official'newspapor of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public heariaga; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY 6RDAMS; SECTION I. That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes. levtad by the City. The trait of land hereby annexed is described lillows, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being part of the 0. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56, A. Thompkins Survey, Abstract No. 1246, A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521 and the J. Edmonson Survey, Abstract No. 400 and being more particularly described as followG: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 60-40, said point lying in the intersection of the west right-of-way line of the G.C. b S.F. Railroad with thA south boundary line of the A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521; THENCE west along the south boundary lane of said Hickman Survey, a distance of 1730 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of the said Hickman Survey; PAGE UNE THENCE north along the west boundary line of: the said Hickman corrnerr''lyinSs.auto east and west' county road U0461ewa);int for a posaid int for nty a corner to dis the west l•ss , to a of 88Cfoot,tmore or the 1880 Abstract No. 400 and boundary the J. line of d the o W. Survey, Survey, Abstract No. thin east line of 1174; THENCE north along the east boundary line of W. Sajvis Survey, a distance of 1100 feet, more or less, to a ppoint for a corner, sa a bo Ln It o northeast and e weal county. ro5A vis Survey, said point yt.. P In an east THENCE west aloe` the north boundary line of the W. U via Survey, same being in the said county road a distance of 1500 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in the present city Points slice lgiclgglh500 foetreaetncof Nand 6perpandiaularttto sthe centerline of 1.H .35W; THENCE north 26051140" east along said present city limits 1244.96 feet, more or less, to a point; THENCE north 20°50'12" east along said present city limits' a distance of 651.21 feet, more or less, to a point for a owner • in the north boundary line of a tract conveyed to We. B. Rogers, at al by deed recorded in Volume 994, page 652, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; r THENCE north 89°38" east aloag the north boundary line of said Rogers tract a distance of 846.20 feet, more or less to a polat, said point being the northwest cornet of Lot It Solar Way Addition; THENCE south 89°12' 11" east, along qhe north boundary ra line of corner, said Lot 11 a distance of 483.25 feet to a polar said point lying $00 feet wait of the east boundary line of•the 0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56•; THENCE north, 500 feet west of and parallel with the east boundary line of said Brewster survey, to appproximate distance east westQOofeandtoperpendicular atoo t'he Intersectionlgofg t500 foot boundary of said survey with the southwest right-of-way line of the C.C. & S.F. Railroad; THENCE east a distance of $00 feet to a point for a corner, ofidgalppdisu ieynwith the intersection of OiC & S.F. Railroad, said paint also being the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 60-40; THENCE southeasterly along the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 60-40 same being the west less, to h the place S.F, Railroad more aor line of of beginning andicontaining 73 feet, 07 acres of land, more or less. . SECTION tl. The above described property is hereby classified as Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official coning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly, PAGE TWO This ordinonos shall be eftiotive iw*diately upoa its Passage. Introduced before the City council on the day of 1984. PASSED AND APPROVW by the City Council on the day of 1984. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST MY 5ECK&TARY V N ALLM, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. uYI.OR, JR. , CITY ATTORNEY • CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 6Y; r~ PAGE THEE lop 41. •1. ~ ~ ' t 1 t I 11 ~ ~ r t t.. ,r,r•r w~•1•IA~•. , 5. ~1.~,«' 'r .'F; 'w lOll' pop . .,~j r^S ~ .'•.,,;y~h•GII~I~ of iR~ 1 i t ' ' 1 , `x•~ • ' ,~1 • , ~ , ,r 1. 1 4.•w~' 11 J 1 J 1 l ~ M 1,~•i Y J i t . ' t:1 S• TLS { 1 1 ' I i 1 . ~ ' ~'i, 1S s ' • 1. ::Sid ' v~• • 1 1 h^'°illop" pWlpllpmpo po mow, OyIV~1.1. d I°a~'~1 ~i .lr ,~.Z t. S t~,,~,lt' ,fG~r'-+ r ~ Jr J 'Jry ~y__ t, rt, , tt•~2LiiSr 5 r:A .Y/`, - ` /O ~O 1T VYww a / •i1' ~•~r r'y"y', 1O 44 2 r. 1 'fJ - t / Y 0 1.. ' .1 ISO Lively RC • 4~ ro' r} s'.~' ri+ ~s •a,; V 4 f+ • rwr r• r ~1 ♦ A.1 . % LA L ! a t . • e . ~i / COn*vf^ 3A1lre "RJ- ij FNekory~-C►ask itJ• i~ a- PIL4r KNOB' .f I IOhhtOR n • . //!p • . J 'll. de r" a ~"~y+C.. Cf Off/ l % Q ` • ° PIZ. ell,'~ •I loph, Re . • • ` r / • r f••. 46 o i" '„'.w° • _ tAt ► ° r r " 04 ~1 1t00 o~'wrG~~+~~E fJ. y ~r^ 1 ~S ' y u f v c•~a'' II; 'iL ~r s d• f,nC • j1'!4=' )}IsC.kCr♦ F1lil'TSCI iL•.1 Fkdj r. yier• Mi Ir Wirl -0 Hari. . r a ,t+.?fglo• PW + a a C 2 [ i R, c v I s . f1 J: Liq f 7 k • R d ' `r S~ ° u x•~ lop I . s. t i r r6 t •a Kt. „ t: NO . AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIM.M. Y 30S.3$ AC1W OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF THE 0. BMSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, S6 A. TAOMPKINS SURVEY, ABSTRAAT NO. 1246, A. HICXW SURVEY, ADS'fRACT NO. 321 AND THE J. EDMONSON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 400, DENTON COUNTY TEXAS' CLASSIFYING THE SANE AS At1RICVLTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPER+Yt AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a regular seetiag of the City Council of the City of Denton, 'Ewan, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and WHEREAS, an opportunity wan afforded, at a public hearing held .for that purpose on the day of , 1964 in the Council Chambers for all nt rarested persons to state their views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS, an opportunity 'was afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the day of , 1984 in the Council Chambers for all Me sited peso-"'Ta'Fa state their views and present evidence baariag upon the annexation provided by thie ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least one time in the official newapapor of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DE'.NTON, TEXAS, HEMY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges of other citizens of said City and shall be bound by the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may hereafter be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit, All that certain tract or paroel of land lying and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the 0. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56, A. Thompkins Survey, Abstract No. 1246, A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521 and the J. Edmonton Survey, Abstract No. 400 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 60-40, said point lying in the intersection of the west right-of-way line of the G.C. & S.F. Railroad with the • south boundary tine of the A. Hickman Survey, Abstract No. 521; THENCE west along the south boundary line of said Hickman Survey, a distance of 1710 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner, same being the southwest corner of the said Hickman Survey; PACE ONC TMC£ north' along the w st boundary line of the said Hi k"a Survey, a distance of 2138 feet, more or less, to a point tar a corner lying in an east and west county road (Rosslawn) 1 THENCE west along the center of said county road a distance of 1880 feet, %ora or less, to a point for a corner in the west boundary line of the J. Edmonton Survey, Abstract No. 400 and the east boundary line of the W. Sa}vis Survey, Abstract No. 1174; THENCE north along the east boundary line of W, Sajvis Survey, A distance of, 1100 feet, more or leis, to a paint for a corner, same being the northeast corner of the W. Saivis Survey, said poiat also lying in an east and west county road; THENCE west along the north boundary line of the W. Sa via Survey, same being is the said county road a distance of I500 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in the present city limits as astablihsed by Ordinanos No. 69.40, Tract I1, said point also lyin $00 feet au t of and perpendicular to tho aenterline of 1.1~.35W; THENCE north 26°51'40" east along said present city limits 1244.96 feet, more or less, to a point; THENCE north 20°50'11" east along said present city limits a Q distance of 6$1.21 feet, mare or less, to a point for a corner in the north boundary line of a tract conveyed to Wm. B. Rogers, at al by dead recorded in Volume 994, Page 6$2, 'of the Deed Records of Denton County,,Texas; THENCE north 89°38" east -along the north boundary line of said Rogers tract a distance of 846.20 feet, more or less to a point, said point being the northwest corner of Lot 1, Soar Way Addition, THENCE south 89°12'11" east along the north boundary line of said Lot 1, a distance of 483.25 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying 500 feet west of the east boundary line of the 0. S. Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56; THENCE north, 500 feet west of and parallel with the east boundary line of said Brewster survey, so approximate distance of 700 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying 500 feet west of and perpendicular to the intersection of the east boundary of said survey with the southwest right-of-way line of the G.C. & S.F. Railroad; THENCE east, a distance of 500 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying at the intersection of the east boundary line of said survey with the southwest right-of-way line of the G.C. & S.F. Railroad, said point also being the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 60.40; THENCE southeasterly along the ppresent city limits as established by Ordinance No. 60-40 same being the west right-of-way line of the G.C. & S.F. Railroad it distance of 7000 feet, more or less, to the place of begSzning and containing 307 acres of land, more or less. • SAVE AND EXCEPT all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the O. S. Brewster Survey, Abst• No. 56 of Denton, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed from Earl W. Wilson to Sue I-I. Wilson by deed recorded in Volume 774, Page 633, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described es follows: WAGE TWO 1 BEOINNm at an old iron pin at a fence corner at the southeast corner of said 2.11 acre treat and on the east boundary line of said'brewster Survey; TtUNCE fence 8700311011 the eastdline of 2Donn3ie Bra* Streets;reel pin THENCE N. 20°55' E. with the east line of said Street 420.5 fast to a steal pin at a fence corner at the southwest corner of a tract out of said 2.11 tore tract as described in a dead from Lavelle Barber to J. H. Howard and wife, on November 14, 19641 and recorded in Volume 516, Page 140, Deed Records of said County; p cre treat ion THENCE a fonts corner ion ithe said (line of 4said f2.11 to and o said Brewster Survey; THENCE South with said fence and said survey line 340.8 feet to the place of beginning, CONTAINING in all 1.654 acres of land. SECTION II. his above dascribed property is hereby classified as Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION lii. , This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Introduced before the City Council on the day of , 1984. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day of , 1984. CITY OF DFMON, TEXAS ATTEST; ,Q CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM! C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE THREE * w : j1 y, ,11 f Wit~~>E~ ~~11 11~I. b t' ~1. Itu • i~1'a1; f PNIMOUNd is IS pst ' . ~ . i,. u ~ 1' r •I q wl I r' Sr 1' w 45 N /1 S w . ' ~ , M 1~ ' V` ; r,.' 'M1~"1 • , . ~ ~~111i. •1 141 • ' •n ~V1I I Ah. ~I• y'~1 r 1 r , , 1 ~T, i.,'I i w~,w 'i•A4',5, , • ••I) .j.!H l.~ % 1 0.1 "1.41 ,ow r • L Is, ' •t1i~1 1r ' , ' 1L I 1 i 1 H I , ,T,• •1L' 6 • , iwC .'•.1H x.•11 1 " ! I r/ V i• " r '.f „r •'j :•.'•+JA.wy•I. 1 i} "'1" II'1 1 : " 11 i 1 ;~e a 1'w 1 I) ~•.^~^,f~R1 ~~d ' ♦ • 1 ~ ~ 1 J ~ t i ' r I~w . , 1 /1.,.~ ''w ~•a1 .•~1 ,1'~d. •7~R "i'i ~N~{,1L ,.r X41 11.1 • • , ~ 1 . •O ~ ` ' `y I ! r 1 • lr r y • M r1, 't i~4;y•. ~^'t1,''•' 't. 1 ♦ *A'., I rt1,, r. ; •'i " •i ~ , .1: .u ft. ~ ill?~~~ 1. • ~-~~y ' I I 1 •11LI" eIn•COSa i ~ ; ,Y . L , . , x212 {~~~~}~~,'t~,r',,~~~~ 01 ~llo too / ~1`•'-r . , t=` a s~►Ce~. 1i'•, ZIE .~G: - z ~ FaS ;~~•~~`'o.: ~ ! , Se ~ Ifr' s. :1 :ifluliL,l 00 miss, Pil 40 awe AL l~11OnM • 2 i 1 • 1--% r Is I 16 N, GOrrytn `r: VAllre '•R~ rj t yA.e r a~r Al, ,~O r l ; fi►~Itl~ L4-ftl► t' i+d✓ u y "ZIt ' i s/ PS LO- KNOS 1 ,Ir. s13Q' IMIO~IfI►PR IAS t ~V 1~, ' 'J~ ♦ r!. lr, kl, 10 10 t 10 06 +c~ lore Rd.y •Crev \ o° S~~ a 50, tRi JI` ell re / 1 • . a • O tiTr~ \ 40 0 r- ti f r i r s 1 me 6 ~ jG 1 •'...-`..:~j"'t0T1'~~il Ro• ~ n, • =r C. ' r'`. l'I e \ 1 1 0 ••rr.'✓~'t ^..yi C+torYl?Ifi'A~•To.r' Gam' GIC 'Jus51n ►.C~6esS r►MtCtiO~• I,i It ' •RdC • • o e worf•' ~lo• itdl d `f ' - L C C" „~.yx,,/ V v' S' r r .kctF3o♦ : R , e r c .f ~.1 Serr. c s . E Rd \ ~J PLLN QF SERVICE FOR ANNM AREA, _21TY 2F DENTON, TEXAS WIMREAS, Article 970% as amended requires that a plan of service e adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS.' Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970& as attended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service; I. Basic Service Plan A, Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; . (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed f as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards. B, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation, C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sexier (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to sewer lines in accordance with article 13,06 of . appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, E, Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. II Service Plan Annsxed Areas :fie two F, Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc. will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of stbrm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. 0. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area • on the effective date of annexation. ' H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric n stribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plan Annexed Areas , Page three L. ;Miscellaneous (1) Strettt name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation, II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five pear plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics. The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly,to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY HEFT MEETING DATE: February 7, 1989 SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 1125 acres of land located on both sides of Mayhill Road north of r-35 (Z-1613) SUMMARY: Adoption of one of the accompanying ordinances and service plan will finally accomplish annexation of this property. In addition to the Roddy Mobile Home Park and the mobile home subdivision proposed in this area, another mobile home subdi- vision is proposed on the east side of Swisher Road and another mobile home park is proposed on about 60 acres on the south side of Page Road. ACTION REQUIRED: Move to adopt ordinance and service plan, ADOPTION REQUIRES SIX (6) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES. ALTERNATIVES: 1, Move to adopt ordinance and service plan 2. Disapprove ordinance and service plan 3, Table SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental Budgets RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance #1 and map 2. Ordinance #2 and map 3, service Plan Charles Watkins Senior Planner 0125g ,i N0. - AN OJOINANCE ANNEXING A TRACY' Of LANO CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO eEIHG ALL THAT LOT, TII*CT OA FAACEL THE CITY OC DENTON, Tlat#S► AND or LAND CONSISTING Of APPAOkI?1ATELY ills ACCA TKESO! Of TE LAND XND LYANLDNO 69:14 00 OEINo SITOA= IN TKE COUNTY Of OENTON, STA PART Of THE J. TAM SUAVEY, MSTRACT NO, 1256, J. WHITE SURVEY, HOUGH MVEY, ABSTRACT 40. d66r D. LAHiEAT AOSTRACT NO, 1433r D. N 130 T,DE TO MSTMCT COUNTY 9SO A SVI%VtYt 4 104, 3 AND THE THE 0.lYIN4 T#E SAKE AS AGAIQ~LTU.1o DISTM4 T%XASAI CLASSI ~ TEX PROPS M AND DECLARING AN tr"CTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduce oentona regular meeting of tnt city Council of the City Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texasj and WHEREAS, an opportunity was fforded, at f 1ublic heariirgi held for that purpose on the day of 1983 the Council Chambers for +11 inteceon rhecsaoirninexationa provided views and present evidence beating upon oy this ordinances and WHEREASr an opportunity was afforded, at a public nearing held for that purpose on the /it day of 1983 in the council Chambers for all interested persons to state their evidence beating upon the annexation provided 'b.16ws this nd 90 n~ti and • WHEREAS, tnis ordinance has been published I lull atTexasa one time in the official newspaper of the C lie hearings, prior to Its effective date, and after the pub NON, THERSFono THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF, DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI span 1- That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the At"t same is hereby annexed arttof said City e&no theeland and the part same is wade hereby the rights anduprivilegesaof otnerocitizens_bofestaideCity and shall be bound by the hacts and ereafter obeinenacted andidthetyproperty effect or which aY tae City.an'Then tracteof land PCOCAt& taxesshleviede suoject to partaOfd therein annexed is derc::tbed as follows, to-wits All that certain tract or paccel of land lying and being situated in the County of Dentonr State of Texas, being part of Hough Survey Abstract No,7 646it0.aLambert ASurvey, th J. Noe 1433,!0. Survey, Abstract No, 784, M,E PAbstract RNo Su1330 ands more partlculacly the 0. Sulker Survey, described as follows) 3EGINNING at a point in tre present city limits as establishe by Ordinance No. 65. 4 3 Tr act I I , said po int ng a t the intersection of the east right-of-way line 0f ,K also ni ly ll iRoad with a point 730 feet northeast of and perpendicular to the centerline 01 I.H. SSao TNtNC4 no 4048terly along 444d present 9441 limits, 750 feet nortneasterly of and parallel wtkA the centerine of 14M. 359 an a9pfxi"ke aiayanoq of? 5812.8 feet to a point for a corner in TMCS north 1043' east along the present city limits as estab- lished by Ordinance No. 80-34 a distance of 917.4 feet to a corner said point lying 800 feet southeasterly of and perpen- dicular to the aoutneast right-of-way line of Loop 2681 THENCE northeasterly along tne present city limits as estab- lished by Ordinance No. 65.43 Tract to $00 feet southeasterly of and parallel with the east rtght-of-way line of Loop 288 to t.r,e east boundary line of the J. Taft Survey, Abstract No. 1256 s4m being the west boundary line of the J. Cheek survey, Abstract No. 3241 THUCS south P S4102* west along trio present city limits as established by Orainance No, 72.56 a distance of 939.60 feet to a point for a corner, save being the southwest corner of tae said J. Cheek Survey? THENCI south 89011135" east along said present city limits, sa." being the south boundary line of the said J. Cheek Survey, a distance of 601.2 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE north 89016020" east along said lines a distance of $59.44 feet to a point for a corners THENCE east alongg one present aig limits as established by Ordinance No. 81-94 a distance of 2680.56 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in the Mayhill Road same being the .nest ~ boundary line of the 0. Walker Survey, Abstract No. 13301 THENCE north 'along said present city limits and the vest boundary line of said walker Survey, a distance of 1228.21 :set to a point for a corner? THENCE east along said present city limits a distance of 1811.08 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 1609120" west along the present city limits as establisned by Ordinance No. 83.18 a distance of 1308.77 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 88615'45" east along said present city limits a distance of 792.29 feet to a points THENCE south 87037154" east along said present city limits a distance of 831.02 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 1041108" west along said present city limits a distance of $41.96 feet to a point for a corner) THEN= south 87.11136" east along said present city limits a distance of 2405.11 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south along the east line of a tract conveyed to Bo.:,,ie E. Coonrod by deed recorded in volume 432, Page 194 of the :red Records of Denton County, Texas, a distance of 1608 feet, wore or less, to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said Coonrod tract) THENCE west along the south boundary line of said Coonrod ::act a distance of ie0 feet, more or less, co a point for a corner in and west Boundary line of a north one soutn county roan, <:,own as swisner koaci 1 THENCE etouth along the west boundary line of said Swisher Road a distancfe of 4146 feet more at less, to a point for a corner, said point being toe intses"%ion of the West boundary line of said Swisher Road wth the north boundary lino of an east and west county road known as Pookrus Roadt THENCE west along the north boundary line of said toakrus toad, a distance of 4500 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in the present city limits, as established by Ordinance No, 78"340 Tract 22) THENCE north 37648104' west alongq said present city limits a distance of 381.6 feet to a point !or a cornea THENCZ north 4906131" east along said present city limits a distance of 393407 feet to a point for a corns a THENCE south 88609'41" east along said present city ltm£ts a distance of 597.01 feet to a point !or a corner) THENCE north 4002'26" east along said present city limits a distance of 1203,3 feet to a point for a corners THENCE north 440S120" east along said peesent city liaits a distance of 73$.19 feet to a point for a cornea THENCT north 4434157" east along the present otty limits as • established by Ordinance No. 83-16, a distance of 735.64 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south $7657130" east along said present city limits a distance of 28.94 feet to.a point for a corner) THENCE north ~2406' eas4 along said present city Limits a distance of 1154.4 feet to a point for a eotner) THENCE north 88.29' West along said present city limits a distance of 1489.1 feet to a point for a Corner) THENCE south 2625130" west along said present city limits a distance of 1140.6 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 4013144" west along said present city limits a distnaee of 719.12 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 10651'09" West along the present city limits as established by Ordinance no. 78-38 a distance of 46.68 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 31641' west along said present city limits a distance of 66 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 54431150" west along said present city limits a distance of 88 feet to a point for a eornar) THENCE south 78041120" west, along said present city limits a distance of 100 feet to a point for a corner) THENCE south 50647150" West along Sa$.d present city limits a distanca of 198.49 feet to a point for a corner) • THENCE south 36139130" weet' along said present ctty Limits a distance of 339.84 feet to a point for i corner) THENCE south 22034'40" West along said present cit7 limits a :)stance oe .31.74 feet to a point for a corner; AMMEMEMEME THENCE south 16640' west Along said present City limits a distance of $1S feet to the place of beginning and containing 1125 acres Of land, more or less. SEC' U II. The above described property is nerebY Classified as Agri- oultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby ass*nded accordingly. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective imaediately upon its passage. Intr duc*d before the City Council on the 22M .L day of PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Cauneil on the day of 19~T , KA R AICW0 0. CITY OF DENT'JN, TEXAS ATTESTS r CWLOT7Z ALUN, MY SECRET" CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROM AS TO LEOAi, FORKS C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTOMEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS sYl Opp 914 Jil P. A•. ..;a~'~"il'• ,4 r I A, .1 r ,J2 ~ ~ ~ , ~'r / / \ ~ '.tit ' ~C~ ' ~ ' :ice`. .}ti~ '~r,~ P OE 1 ..W-.3;eqR . r ii fi; aL i::t-..1. 'ti i Ste: f ~ , . I E 1•:;--::•:::~.• 6 k' to 34 y ~~r47 r o ~ t • 'Ali • C\~`/~yf S H A 0 Y/ I 1 i rte. SHORES I - .'Ryan A • • _ ~ 3or1li =~/r;;;~ - • ' CORINTH' - .r M i • / • Pop J I _ _ tom,' • o 1~ • v ~ l:.~L. it: Mlekorr Ccf*ok RA' 44 it 9e ~Alfbn S: ( x e ; • 00 v .JJ/""" * r cAS JEL ~ HIChORY A or OAi_L ~ R CREEK pop A ~ f ~ : _ 'may • - " to 44 chid •M It a 1i': , t ! v /r r.. , _ ,,,~•h',J ,'ma'y L'Ad 't, Z NO. AN ORDINANCZ ANNFXINO A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON TEAS BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND AXING CONSISTING 61 IN THE COUNTY 0 L DENTON STATE OF TEEW AND 91M PART OF THE J. TAFT SURVEY, ABSTRACT I~o. 1256, J. SMITE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1433 D. HOUGH SURVEY M$ TRACT NO. 646 D. LANI RT SURVEY, ABSTRACT VO. 784, M,E.A, 6 P.R.A. SURVEY, ABShACT No, 9950 AND THE 0. WAL n SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. JS3140, DENTON COUNTY, TF:Wt CLASSIFYING THE SANE AS AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHSRXAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a ro$ular rNtin= of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, Texas; sad WHEREAS, an opportunity w a afforded, at a public hearing held for that purpose on the /49 day of . Q 6ev., 19 4~ , in the Counoil,Chambers for all ~raated persona to state--Mir views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this ordinance; and WHEREAS,' an opportunity w 'M afforded, at a public heariag,held for that purpose on the ~ day of ower4 , 198,3 , in the Council Chambers for all -faterested persons to state tTi'eir views and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this • ordinance; and WHEREAS, this ordinaabs has been published in full at least one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective data, and after the public haariags; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS, HERESY 6RDAMSo Section 1. That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and privil•g•a of other citizens of said City and shall be subject to and shall bear its prorate part of the taxes levied by the City. The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit; Tract I All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and beingg situated in the county of Denton, State of Texas, being part of tha J. Taft survey, Abst. No. 1236, J. White survey, Abet. No. 1433 D. Rough survey, Abst. No. 646, D. Lambert survey, Abst. No. 754 and the M.E.P. & P.R.R. survey, Abst. No. 950 and more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 65-430 Tract 11; said point also lying at the intersection of the east right-of-way line of Mayhill Road with a point 750 feet northeast of and perpendicular to the centerline of T.H.35E; THENCE Northwesterly along said present city limits, 75U feet • northeasterly : and parallel with., the centerline of 7..H.33E an approximats distance of 5812.8 feet to a point for a corner in the present city limits; PACE ONE i THENCE North 1°42' East along the present aiCy limits as established by Ordinance No. 80.38, a distance of 917.4 feat to a point for a corner, said point lyic 600 feet southeasterly of and perpendicular to the southeast right-of-way line of Loop 268; THENCE Northeasterly along the present city l is as established by Ordinance No. 65-43, Tract I 00 feet southeasterly of and parallel with the east right-of-way line of Loop 2880 to the east boundary line of the J. Taft survey, Abst. No. 1256, name being the west boundary line of the J. Cheek survey, Abet. No. 324; THENCE Sout,>1 0°54'02" West, aloe the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 72-56, a distance of 939.6 feet to a point for a corner, sane being the southwest corner of the J. Cheek survey, Abet. No. 324; THENCE South 8911135" East, along said present city limits, same being the south boundary line of the J.. Cheek survey a distance of 601.2 feat to a point for a corner, sass being the northeast corner of the J. White survey, Abst. No. 1433 and the northeast corner of the 0. Hough survey, Abst. No. 646; THENCE South, along the east boundary line of the J. White survey, ease being the west boundary line of -the D. Hough survey to a point for a corner in the Southwest right-of-way line of the M.R. A T. Railroad; . THENCE Southeasterly along the southwest right-of-way line of the M.X. L T, Railroad to a point for a corner at the intersection of the post right-of,-w% line of Mayhill Road with the Southwest right-of-way' line of the M.K. FAT. Railroad, said ppoint lying in the present city limits as established by Ordinance No. 78.38, Traot•I; THENCE South 50°47'50" West, along said present city limits, a distance of 198.49 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 36°39"30" West, along said present city liaita, a distance of 339.84 feet to a point for a corner; THENCE South 22°34'40" West, along said present city limits, a distance of 151.74 feet to a point for a corner, THENCE South 16°40' West, along said present city limits, a distance of 615 feet to the place of beginning and containing 235 acres of land more or leas. All that certain lot or tract of land lying and being situated Tract II; in the county of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the G. Walker survey, Abst. No. 1330 and more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits, said point lying at the most easterly southeast corner of the tract as described, in Ordinance No. 78-38, Tract 11; THENCE North 4°34'57" East, along the said present city limits, a distance of 577 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner; THENCE East, a distance of 1444.6 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner, said point being the northwest corner of a tract of land conveyed to Gilbert Waldrip by deed recorded in Volume 103.', Page 971, of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; :NEirCE South 85°14'21" East, along the north boundary line of said tract, passing at 446.61 feet the northeast corner of said tract, same being the northwest corner of a tract conveyed to PAGE TWO w lume 3881 of the deedVrocord4 oyf Dent Oa County, Toxast and cone,ioui~n8 for a total distance of 1575.94 feet to a point for a corner, same beint this northeast corner of said Pate Rd. Joist Venture tract; of said of l'335tets .27 the east test, $*mth 7$5914611 point for corner,, act, tract, acdiataaee 1of11497 33, along point for n+ corlner; of said ttract, aodistance o41131$ Wes 27 loot tohe ea pointbforda oc"orel of said THENCE South, aloe` the east boundary line of said tract a distance of 165.27 iset to a point tos • Goner* saw bsiAt the southeast corner of said tract, said point lyint io Page Road; sa~id C tract;, alons Pat* Wait along distance ofsouth 12bound 64 7a fo t~to oa point for a corner, same beint southwest corner of said tract; ttractE, aodistance ofll738.6,tootnto a point forum corner, of said THENCE West, passing at 463.5 feet the southeast corner of a tract conveyed to L. C. Dupree by deed recorded in Volume 530, soft 798.5 feet t Pagen 541 and contiauing for a total tdistance said southwe corner of • t for a corner, saes being poi Dupree tract and the southeast aornar• of a tract conveyed of Richard H. Baron by dotd .recorded In Volume 543, Page the Dead Records of Denton. County, Texas; THENCE 89°58'20" West, elect the south boundary line of said Berta tract, a distance of 41.26 feet to a point for a corner, same being the southeast corner of a tract conveyed to Andrews Corporation by deed recorded In Volume 912, Page 790, of the Deed r Denton County, THENCE North 86'06'30", West, along the south boundary lint of and dcontaining 63 dstatet s of land more ortless~ place of beginning All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the county of Denton, State of Texas, being part of Tract III.; the G.' Walker survey, Abst. No. 1330 and more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a point in the present city limits as established sout west corner of8the8 tractdto describedgintlsaid ordinanceeandd the northwest corner of a tract conveyed to Bonnie Coonrod by deed recorded in Volume 432, Page 194, of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE South 87°11'36" East, along the said present city limits, a corner; Coonrod tract, g distanceiogf 5the north 00.6 feet to a d line of THENCE South 500 fast east of and parallel to the west 'boundary corner in distance the a south of bo1595 undary elint of s le said line lea;, of, SAIJ to a point u for d a tract, Coonrod tract; THENCE North 35'46'37ing along northW stlicorner said Coonrod tract, passing deed recorded in of a tract conveyed to Park Services, Inc. by PAGE THREE Volume 1243, ?a p 604 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and continuing for a total, distance of 1351 fast to a Seoint for a cornar, same being the northeast corner of said Park rvices, Ina, tract and lying in a north and south road (mown as Svisher Road; TUNCE South along the east boundary line of said Park Services, Inc. tract and in said road, a distance of 678.27 feet to a ppoint for a corner, same being the southeast corner of said Park Services, Inc. tract, THLNCE South 89'38154" West, along the south boundary of said Park Services, Inc, tract passing at $89.39 foot the cost southerly southwest corner and continuing for a total distance of 2051 feet to a point foc a oorner; THMCE North pasaiag at 14, feet the southwest corner of said Coonrod tract and continuing along the west boundary line of said Coonrod tract a total dstance of 2304 feat to the place of beginning and containing 50 acres of land sore or leas SECTION II. The above described property is hereby classified as Agricultural "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map 'of the City of Denton, Texas, which map is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION III. This ordinance shall. be effective immediately upon its passage. I trodugqed before the City Council on the day of No JP m 6e ✓ 198x' , PASSED AND APPROVED 'by the City Council on the day of KIM= U. SWLWART, FMYUK CIYY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTCE A"4 CITY OF DEMON,,TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE FOUR I ~y.P'• r . • I• , ' Yom/► i • t.~ a~, 1 S I -0 i ' fin' , •t• .i•i • _ • 1 ..,1.,~., . fit' J' i , • 1r M, Ar' 00 - • 141 ~ f~ ~ ~ a! 4' hjl ~ 6 . •„T; ~ ' J ~Z1 ' r ~f ~1 fO~ is 1 ."J ti { ? ` i:::•''.:, t Ii: r. W..> 111 `t X R L _ •Jr~r= '•r,r try ~i~ I~♦/, '1 , ~S~~ 'POO 1LIA0 4 /,o x':.35 ;t,; I E SOT h ~ ~ ~ti R j.;e•-!1 d to ~.OR! N T :iL -o ti•~:: < ' Ast Lk* ~ PO► ♦6~ _ ;j•.t..,:~, . lKttkorr • f 'J y~„ ,~`ii• oA. A '/i".StG'1 ~li'' • ~ fjj~1~'i~.y ~:'L'~ai','J, 1 ;~y T;~'~'~lr:xE~ NJ, C 3 F E.: 0 Ili` P` w.~1~.,\~(I t~'t N40., `~.i 4C rl.~ ,ry, •~"i , HICKORY ~ • • ~ r rr f ~ ~ j1, a • . ¢~t t.=,~",1~' ~ p o C 21 t~ • f i~~~,'•_,, 9 !'d ,1, I ~C r Q • Y F~..'r'•'fl ~„J'. 'l~y~~` ~4 Y~ S ✓'S' `1 •~t` ~ I~,E 1 ,r+' II • • • `~,cV ~:~yyl~~% ...4'~ ~ `.i '•r • /~d+T•ir~r,, , ~i~ `''1'`•~M1C•k.lTHftl ~~.,..f } '1 G~•,~, R • • ' ' . • p{ t h l d ► i 1! ~I I I : 'ff+ i . 'tC -~•'r; fti V`. i{ F,. ..yr;lo• ii! • T o ~J'/ JiC:;, PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNr=- AREA, CITY OF DENTON. TEX WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordina.noe annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on,& map of the proposed annexation. NOWO THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 9701 as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of services 1, Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio reatponses to calls, and other routine services, will beprovided ponsthe effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, . and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established-by appropriate study and traffic standards. S, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel pand roved equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be on the effective date of annexation. C, Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 13.06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connec-~ed to sewer lines in accordance with article 13,06 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. • E, Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of 'annexation. service plan annexed Areas gage two y. Streets (1) Ekholes, measuresenecessarytforrtrafficfflow, *tca chuchuc will begin on the effective date Of aanexat oa. annexedsareaton (2) present oit7o same basis preseesent citq the effective date of annexation. (3) Re Of stormndrand resurfacin of ainage facilitiss,$constructiouaafa tuon rn curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the wtherefore is body, policies of the city. 0. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas housing, annexation,annexation area, ofbegin oonsanitationt e2iective )datewill H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning Jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on atvilleffereafter date of annexation. City planning encompass the annexed area. 1. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- developed polacies areas of in accordance c citgance with the tially established J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standilds afol- policies now used in the present city w be lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, . K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. Service Plaz Annexed i~ rats Page three • L,. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. 11. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as: (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities. (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics., • The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city, HINny S MiLLIA CO., REALIOR$s 2001 ERYAN TOWER 90YM FLOOR DALLAS. TEXAS 14101 TELEPHONE YIAIiN 0111 J, Mlkol 0"I AUSTIN DALLAS EL PASO 1`041 WORTH HOUSION SAN ANTONIO BRUSSELS FRANKFURT TELEX 70.1469 senior or V KO Plasid1~II0oM'k January 6, 1984 Mr. Charles Watkins City of Denton Municipal Building .Denton, Texas 76201 Rey, Interstate 35-B at 9 Acres Mayhill Road Dear Mr, Watkinst Enclosed please find an executed petition lofor Annexation for the property owned by HSM Inc., Trustee, under- standiastnthe of I 35-E in the • standing that the City general Mayhill Road area was to be voted on by 17th Council on January 3rd but was tabled until the January City Council Meeting. In the event the City Council elects not to annex those properties esire previously HSM Inc., Trusteehthatyour1300.941-acretion, it is the d tract be annexed into the City of Denton on an individual an- nexation case on January tThis will enable our commission owning case to to be heard by by January 25th. Should you have any questions concerning this petition for Annexation please don't hesitate to contact me. very truly yours, olds Mike Reyn /emz Enclosure • f hOJLif N. °(l•JPC ,il.n iq•$ <•irt'E _ qqq •#'1E UlF°: .,a.. .L re eS, E.. .E .i v~bF S• C R. M<kVNN~y , 0 to x qq s~cea d A N r~~S ~~>~V Opp SITE s~ •1C MOO V SCALE; *r2ooo* VIGIMTY MAP 0 ~,I R E S O L U T I O N NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, recognizes that the consumption of alcoholic beverages while operating a motor vehicle is a significant factor in a large number of tragic accidents and deaths on Texas Highways; and WHEREAS, the Attorney General of the State of Texas has declared that cities do not have the authority to adopt local ordinances banning the possession of alcoholic beverages in motor vehicles;.pow, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; SECTION I. That the Legislature of the State of Texas is urged to enact legislation prohibiting the possession of alcoholic beverages in motor vehicles or, alternatively, authorizing cities to do so cy local ordinance; That all citizens of the City of Denton are hereby encouraged to support such legislation by contacting their alectsc state representatives; and That the City Secretary is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the elected state representatives and senators representing the citizens of the City of Denton, Texas. PASSrD AND APPROVED this the day of February, 1984. ,~a4bff RICHARD CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AT ;'EST: l.nKr AL) ,U, 1 ARY CITY OF DENTM', TEXAS . APPROVED AS 'O LEGAL FW1,_ " C. 1 4 RESOLUTION WHVEAS, the City Council of Denton, Texas is a joint owner with the County of Denton, Texas, in Flow Memorial Hospital, a public, acute care, general hospital, and WHEREAS, there exists as application subject to the review and approval of the Texas Health Facilities Commission, the regulatory body in the State of Texas responsible for granting Certificates of Need for health care facilities in accordance with Section 1122 of the Social Security Act as amended, and WHEREAS, said application made by First Texas Medical, IAC, is for approval to construct, own, and operate a fifty bed general, acute care private hospital within the city limit of Denton, Texas, and WHEREAS, the construction and operation of such a facility as proposed in the application to the Texas Health Facilities Commission made by First Texas Medical, Inc., is unnecessary duplication of existing facilities, is not necessary to meet the requirements of the medical service area, and will not be accessible to all patients in the medical service are, and WHEREAS, the -,oloremantioned proposed new hospital, if Certificates of Need were to be granted by the Texas Health Facilities Commission, and it then subsequently constructed, would have an adverse effect on Flow Memorial Hospital and its abilities to Continue to provide health care services to the population served, predominantl/ the residents of the City of Denton, Texas, and the County of Denton, Texas; now, therefore BE TT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; SECTION I. That the Texas Health Facilities Commission is urged to deny approval for a Certificate of Need, based upon the failure of the application to meet the Commission's standards, for the project proposed by First Texas Medical, Inc,, to build a hospital in Denton, Texas; and That the City Secretary Is hereby directed to forward a copy of this RESOLUTION to the Texas Health Facilities Commission in Austin, Texas, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of February, 1984. . CHARD 0. STE RT, M YOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C, J, TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY 6Y; • r MINUTES CI'rY OF DENTON DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOA'.ZD February 1, 1984 Called meeting of the City of Denton Data Processing Advisory Board, Wednesday, February 1, 1984 at 7:00 A,M. at the Ramada Inn. Members Present: Gerald Cardwell Dale Maddry Ron McDade Ray Pittman Members Absent: Bill Shanks Others Present: Chris Hartung Rick Svehla Robert Nelson Jay Anderson Joe La Beau and Gary Collins of the City Staff 1, The meeting was opened by Ray Pittman and the minutes of the regular meeting of August 10, 1983 were considered. Dale Maddry made a motion the minutes be approved and Ron McDade seconded the motion, Motion carried. 2. Gary Collins informed the Board of the ordinance that was passed by City of Denton City Council on January 16, 1984 establishing the Data Processing Board as a standing advisory board which will meet on an "as needed basis." A discussion followed regarding Mr. Bill Shanks inability to attend meetings of this Board and a suggestion was made the Board elect a new chairman. Ray Pittman made a motion that Gerald Cardwell serve as chairman of this Board and Ron McDade ;,econded the motion. Motion carried. 3. Gary Collins provided the Board with a status of the Data Processing Department accomplishments since the last meeting and future implementation plans for the remainder of the fiscal. year. 4. A discussion on the merits of the I.B.M. personal computers and the capabilities of this equipment. During this di.s ussion, it was pointed out that this equipment provided the requesting departments with a powerful productivity tool and that this equipment would be capable of communication to the I.B.M. Data Processing Advisory Board Minutes for February 1, 1984 p.2 mainframe computer system. Also, it was noted that while the anticipated life of thin equipment was 7-plus years, each requesting department had showed a two-year or less payback period. Gary Collins informed the Board of his recommendations that the printer propsed by i.B.M, not be selected, but that the City acquire a printer similar to EPSON MX100 or its equivalent. Each of the requesting departments discussed with the Board how they planned on using the equipment and the potential benefits each department would receive. Ron McDade made a motion that the Data Processing Advisory Board recomme; 9 that the City Council direct the Data Processing Department to enter into a contract with I.B.M. to acquire nine (9) I.B.M. personal computers, nine (9) monitors and nine (9) copies of the software packages known as LOTUS 1,2,3 and PEACH TEXT, The motion was seconded by Ray Pittman. The motion carried, 5. Gary Collins discussed with the Board that the new law regarding conflict of interest disclosure would in all probability not apply to this Board due to its advisory nature with no other responsibilities. The purpose of this item on the agenda was for information purposes 'only. 6. With no further business, Ray Pittman made a motion the Board meeting be adjourned and Dale Maddry seconded the motion. The motion carried. AQENDA CITY OF DENTON DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD February 1, 1984 Called meeting of the City of Denton Data Processing Advisory Board, Wednesday, February 1, 1984 at 700 a.m. at the Ramada Inn Restaurant meeting room, Denton, Texas. 1. Approve minutes of August 10, 1983 meeting 2. Discuss the status of the Data Processing Advisory Board 3. Consider recommendation on the acquisition of micro-computers for user departments 4. Discuss Conflicts of Interests statue 5. New business I CITY of DEWON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL SWL01MG / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE 017) 566.8200 MEMO Ft AN DUM TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Gary Collins, Director of Data Processing SUBJ: Justification of Personal Computers DATE: November 170 1983 As you know, we have received a number of requests for .'dial computers from various departments directors and divis w4', managers. I have attached copies of the justification for these personal computers for your review. The savings benefit outlined in these attachments were compiled by the requesting department.. The following outlines my review of these justifications. In order to preclude debate, the savings in personnel costs and reduced man hours are taken at the values shown in the attachments. Th;s memorandum only addresses the validity of equipment costs,'-.he feasibility of performing the tasks, and the frequency the tasks will be performed as outlined in the attachments. In the memo from Mr. !tick Svehla, he indicates in Item 7 that there would be a combined one hour/day savings to Building inspection staff and Customer Service staff having access to the data base of the Building Inspection personal computer. At this time and for the short-torm basis, it will not be possible for a terminal to inquire into data bases contained on personal computers. If we eliminate this item from the justification, the payback period would be .57 years. It appears this personal computer will be used in perform- ing daily tasks and will have a high usage. In the memo from Mr. Jay Anderson, he indicates a monthly savings of 150 associated with the reduction of a terminal. Currently, the terminal costs approximately $100/mo. If we reduce this savings by $50 per month. The personal compu~-n. for the Accounting division will be 11.3 months. It would appear this personal computer will be uAed primarily for monthly and annual tasks with the exception of daily terminal oriented tasks. In the staff report from Mr. Bob Nelson, he segregated the justifi- cation of the personal computer by functional area and my response will address these justifications in the same manner. quatifJoAtIgn 0 1983 In the justification for the personal computer for the Utility Administration office, there. is. a $191/month which is associated with New Tasks, This monthly justification is based on the benefits derived from closing 4 load forecast and a forms' analysis. While these benefits are ongoing once-the load forecast and the forms analysis is done, these tasks would be performed one time on an irregular time frame and, therefore, could be performed on any personal computer available in the City. I feel that we should eliminate this item from the justification, thus mlking our payback period 16.6 months. This personal computer would be used primarily for monthly and annual tasks with the exception of the limited inquiry to the Utility Billing System. In the justification of the personal computer at the Service Center, the item labelled New Tasks accounts for $1,387.50/month. Again, these tasks would appear to be one-time items that could be accomplished on any personal computer available. Also, in this justification there is an $813/month benefits associated with Utility Data System Data retrieval-and maintenance. It would appear this task would be appropriately performed by inquiry to the Utility Billing System and/or to the proposed labor distribution portion of the Payroll System. If we eliminat.,: the $1,387.50/month benefit for New Tasks, we have a payback period of 6.86 months. If we eliminate both the New Tasks and the Utility System Data, we have a payback period of 15.49 months. In the Electric Plant justification, the item labeled Maintenance and Inventory Schedules accounts for a 5393/month savings. It is my feeling'-that this task would be better accommodated by the proposed Materials Management System on the mainframe and/or the proposed Fleet Management System. If this item was eliminated from the justification, the payback period for this personal computer would be 15.23 months. Most of the remaining tasks would be monthly or annually oriented. In the justification of the personal computer for the Water Plant, there again, is an item of New Tasks dealing with Maintenance Schedule. This task, again, seems more-appropriate for the proposed r1eet Management System: If we eliminate this benefit, we have a payback period on this personal computer of 0.6 months. Most tasks associated with this personal computer will be of a monthly or annual basis. In the; justification for the personal computer at the Wastewater 'Treatment Plant, again, we have a benefit associated with inventory Maintenance which I feel is more appropriately a task for the proposed Inventory System. If we eliminate this benefit, we have a 26-month payback period based upon the full cost of the personal computer or a seven-month payback if we consider the cost of the personal computer after reimbursement from a federal grant. it should be noted that this personal computer was not listed in our original memo to you concerning requests for personal computers. It is my opinion that we should acquire a personal computer for the Purchasing divis.l .on's use at the Service Center. This personal us ifica ihn of Pers co utera 12,3 ovember 17. 1983 computer would replace the current terminal being used by the Purchasing division for inputing purbhase e-orders and daily inquiry to the budget. Additionally,, this personal computer will. give-the Purchasing division the capability to perfo= some word processing and budget preparation tasks. Additionally, I am recommending that the Data Processinq Department acquire a personal computer which will allow our staff to provide programming support and assistance in operations to'the staff of other departments in their use of personal computers. Also, this personal computers will replace a terminal in the Data Processing Department. We will await your approval of this matter before issuing a request for bid for nine personal computers. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Zi-a-ry A Co line Director of Data Processing cc: Jay Anderson John Marshall Bob Nelson Rick Svehla ✓ attachments rc J CITYo1 DENrom r EXAS _ MUNICIPAL RUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 16201 /TELEPHONE (8)71 566.8200 Office of the City Mc"ager M E M O R A N D U M TO: Gary Collins FROM: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager DATE: November 9, 1983 SUBJECT: Justification for the IBM PC in the Building Inspection/Engineering Divisions I visited with the staff and discussed the time saving aspects of installing the IBM PC in the Inspection Division. I have taken the staffs recommendations on time saving and reduced them to what I feel are appropriate numbe ,s. Most of tre staff feel that these numbers are conservative. The time that we would be able to save is as follows: 1. Currently, the inspectors come into the office in the morning, collect all of the phone messages and requests for inspections and make a log of all the places where they must make inspections for that day. This process takes each of the three inspectors approximately 30 minutes each morning. We understand that the capabilities of the IBM PC will allow us to generate these lists from the machine every evening so this thirty minutes of each inspector's time would be eliminated each day for a total of 1 1/2 hours each day. 2. The office support staff and the Assistant to the Building Official spend approximately 3 hours per day on inquiries from builders and contractors as to whether inspections have been made, whether red tags have been issued, or the status of their request for inspection. Since the activities from the prior day, as well as activities in the morning, will be entered into the machine by noon, any requests that are received for information on inspections that have occurred the prior day will be able to be answered by making an inquiry into the machine. This will eliminate the support staff having to look through unposted paper work, etc. We will be able to eliminate approximately 2 1/4 hours of office support time each day by using the machine. Page Two justification for the IBM PC in the Building Inspection/ Engineering Divisions 3. Currently, it takes more than a hour each' day to post the result's of the inspection activity of all the inspectors for that day. Since all the activities for the day would already be on-line in the machine, approximately one hour per day would be saved in posting time. 4. Currently, there is a file kept on existing Certificates of Occupancy. If these were put on the machine, we would save approximately 45 minutes each day trying to find information on the status of C.O. inspections. 5. If the machine was installed, red togg activities could be relayed immediately to the office. Better tracking could be kept for billing and since charges are made for red tags, we feel the red tag inspections would be reduced. If they were not reduced, we would still reduce the amount of time taken looking through existing paper work or trying to contact inspectors on the status of what was wrong, since they will have called those in immediately and entered into the P.C. We estimate that we would eliminate the inspection or the amount of time looking through existing paper work or trying to contact the inspector in the field to find out the status of the red tags for a combined total of 10 of these situations. Currently, each one of these situations takes approximately 15 minutes to handle. With the reduction of approximately 8 of these, we would eliminate 2 hours of work each day. 6. Currently, we type cards for posting on all the new building permits that are issued. This typing and filing takes approximately one/half hour per day. We would eliminate all of the filing of these cards by having them on-line in the machine. 7. Currently, Inspections and Customer Service deal with each other on final inspections and whether connections should or should not be made to new construction. If the PC could be connected to the mainframe, then customer service would be able to see our activities for each day, approximately 1/2 hour of their time and 1/2 hour of our time would be saved for a total of one hour per day. I ' . Page Three Justification for the IBM PC in the Building Inspection/ Engineering Divisions These seven items total approximately 9 hours -a day that would be saved in the Building Inspections area. There are also some monthly savings that we feel would occur in billing and in compiling reports for various agencies. I also feel that there would be some applications in engineering. We do not feel comfortable at this point in claiming any reduction in time by implementing this system for these savings. Assuming that we save nine hours a day for 260 days per year, we would save 2,340 hours per year. Using a conservative $5.00 per hour figure for wages, this would total a little over $14,000 per year. This does not count the monthly savings in billing or report compiling in inspections or any savings from the engineering department, or any minor applications for emergency management. We have been advised that the cost of our configuration for building, inspections would be approximately $7 200.00. This means that using the conservative numbers Lhat - we have generated, payback for this installation of the PC would be approximately .51 of a year. If we can swer any further questions, please call. Ric Svehla Assistant City Manager 0470R C/Tyol DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M E M 0 R A N D V M DATE: November 3, 1983 TO: Gary Collins, Director of Data Processing FROM: W. Jay Anderson, Senior Accountant SUBJECT Acquistion of an IBM Personal Computer The accounting Division acquired two (2) Osborne computers June 24, 1983. The units have been consistently used internally and when use permits, have been loaned to other divisions for their use, During the past budget period the units were very instrumental in completing the project on time. Other uses of the systems include LGFS System analysis, cash investment analysis, Customer Information System reporting and analysis, as well as a number of schedules and analysis'. The units have been very good tools, although they do have their limitations. The primary limitation has been that of internal memory; the Osborne's memory cannot be expanded. The original acquisition cost of the Osborne's was nominal, $895 including software; because of price, the lack of expandability, software limitations, and other capabilities could be ignored. We have now proven to ourselves the need and uses for a more flexible machine. I would like to request the approval to purchase an IBM personal computer. The price would be approximately $7,200. Configuration of the system is as follows: PC 3270: including 684K memory, 10 megabyte drive, floppy disk drive, host comm board, color monitor, Epson MX100 printer Software: Lotus 1, 2, 3, Wordstar, Mailmerge and Spellstar As I understand it, the availability of this machine will be in the first quarter of 1984. , Memo 0. Collins November 3, 1983 Page 2 The justification of this system could be summarized as follows: In conjunction with the City's annual financial audit, Arthur Andersen & Co, have developed a series of financial statements that utilize the IBM PC format and Lotus 123 program. It would be difficult to place an exact dollar value for justification of this asset, but it would be the cost of an accountant developing the worksheets for the financial audit on a continuing basis. It could be estimated at 160 hours at $9.00 per hour or $1,400, This same program could be utilized monthly for the Utility System Financial reports saving 20 hours per month or $180 per month. The IBM 3270 will have the ability to interact with our host system which could be the savings of a terminal or approximately $150 per month. One of the divisions existing computers will be freed up by the use of the proposed system. The Accounting Clerk Supervisor has expressed a desire to place hand generated schedules that could be automated and save man hours in these areas. Time that would be saved could be estimated at near 40 hours per month at a rate of approximately $6,00 per hour or $240 per month. Summary of the cost savings is as follows: Annual savings of Financial Audit $1,400 Monthly savings: Financial report for utilities $180 Cost of Terminal 150 Scheduling savings 240 Monthly Savings annualized 570 61840 Annual Benefits $8,240 System pay back period is 10.5 months W. Jay And rson cyb 0976F 1 1 PROPOSED MICROCOMPUTING EQUIPMENT DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITY DEPARTMENT AN ASSESSMENT OF BENEFITS October 24, 1983 City of Denton, Texas A STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR OF DATA PROCESSING FROM THE UTILITY ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT R. E. NELSON, DIRECTOR OF UTILITIES a By R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities Joseph A. Labeau, Administr&tive Assistant 11 11 1 1 1 ~ ` i . \ r ' 1 r • SUMMARY Purmnsa and ScQDe oxt of the utility This report is submitted in sthe :Director's request for microcomputin$ equipment. It identifies planned placement, application, benefit, and cost of the proposed equipment. Conclusion The benefit by month and total equipment cost is compared Pay-out is as a below for each site and for proposal benefit. terms of months sand is simply to their present Leased items are costed by converting payments value. Cost(Present Value Payout Site Benefit 12 Uti1. Admin. 623.63 $7,733'20 2,666.15 $25,540.65 Svc. Center 10 7 Elect. Plant 1,044.16 $70133.20 Water Plant 1,224.39 $7,733.20 6 2 $ Lab & WG1TP 1.072._4_4 $1,933.30 Sum 61630.77 $50,673.55 2573/25760 1 Based on these data, benefits vastly outweigh costa. Mere, each piece of equipment will pay for itself within a year of its implementation, with most sites having less than an eight-month payout This extremely good pay-out rate is even more positive when oas recalls the very narrow view of benefits taken by this study. In short, it seems that the equipment is not only justified, but that it should be implemented at the very earliest opportunity because the Department of Utilities is effectively losing money every day it goes without it. 2. INTRODUCTION Baokaxound On September 12, 1983) the City Manager issued a memorandum that directed City departments to submit a list of their anticipated m4rocomputing needs to the Director of Data Processing, This report reviews the Utility Department's assessed requirements for such equipment from a cost/benefit perspective. This approach was employed because the equipment, although included in the approved budget, nevertheless represents a significant expenditure that is appropriate only to the degree that benefits exceed costs, Constraints Microcomputing equipment is expected to improve both the quality and quantity of clerical and administrative output per unit of worker hours. Additionally, computerized analysis is expected to allow the operator to identify and execute capital economies that were before impossible. In order to preserve and preclude debate> this credibility an report avoids applications based on conjecture and ignores the benefit of improved product quality. In short, the analysis is confined to only those benefits that may be readily and objectively priced. This consequently tends to greatly understate benefits. Methodoloav Computer applications we,•e obtained by interviewing prospective users within each division of the Department of Utilities. The benefit of each application was de,*ived from a two-fold analysis. First, improvement of labor productivity was priced by applying the wage of the worker to the time required to perform a task, before and after computerization. Second, where approp•:riate, capital pro~'uctivity improvement was priced by assessing the cost of resources per unit of output both before and after computerization. Where entirely new tasks are proposed, the benefit of the task is reduced by the cost of the labor and capital (excluding computing equipmene) required to perform it. 3. i 1 In each case, the reduction of cost is based on an estimate of the min improvement that computerization would have upon task efficiency, Organization The next section of this report, APPLICATIONS AND ECONOMIES, first considers microcomputing benefits from a location-by-location perspective, In this part of the section, specific applications are evaluated, The final part of this section reviews the anticipated timing of microcomputing installation and, identifies funding sourceA. 4. ' r 1' r r APPLICATIONS AND ECONOMIES 1. Utility Administration This location will require one IBM PC-XT and one dot matrix printer. Software requirements will include Lotus 1230 Wordstar, Spellstar, and Mail/merge packages. Below, specific applications are outlined and the benefits are quantified by month Billing_Analvsis This task is cu`rrontly consuming approximately twenty-four hours of a P-4 employee's time per month. A spreadsheet program for this task would reduce costs by at least thirty-three (33) percent. P-4 Labor Before (24)(10.53) ■ $252-72 Less Labor After (.66)(252.72) $166.80 BZNEFIT $85.92 hate Ana_lvsis This activity consumes eighty (80) percent of a P-4 employee's time during three months of the year. Approximately fifty (50) percent of this time is spent collecting, cleaning and co,paring rate data, as well as generating graphics for public presentations. It is estimated that the time required for these tasks will be reduced by at least thirty-three (33) percent when data are stored and manipulated by microcomputer. P-7 Labor Before (.8)(.5) 5,476/12 ■ $182.52 46 . Less Labor After (.66)(182.52) 1120120.46 BENEFIT $62.06 Quantitative Analysis Presently a P-3 spends approximately thirty-five (35) percent of work-time engaged in statistical and financial calculation, including graphic composition. During non-rate setting months (9 months per year), a P-7 spends about twenty-five (25) percent of his time in similar tasks. It is expected that microcomputing will reduce the time required for these general and routine analyses by at least twenty-five (25) percent. 1 i P-3 Labor before (s35)(1250) $437.50 Less Labor After 75) (437.50) Lai .'.1. BENEFIT $109.37 P-7 Labor Before (.25)(.75)(11825) $3+2.19 Less Labor After (.75)(342.19) $256.64 BENEFIT $85.55 Budget coam ositian in addition to routine duties, the annual budget process requires that the Director, a p-7 employee, and a P-3 employee spend respectively about twenty-four (24) hours, thirty-two (32) hours, and sixteen (16) hours engaged in calculating and recalculating the coming year's cxpenditures and revenues. The time required for this task would at least be reduced by half if done with a microcomputer. Dir. Labor, Before (24)(21.87)/12 ■ $43.74 Less Labor After (.5)(43.74) 21'87 BENEFIT $21.87 P-7 Labor Before (32)(10.54)/12 $28.11 $14.06 Less Labor After (28.11)(.5) BENEFIT $14.05 • P-3 Labor Before (16)(7.21)/12 a $9,61 Labor After (9.61)(.5) a 4.80 BENEFIT $4.81 Word Processing Since numeric tables can be merged with text files in the PC without re-keying the data, secretarial labor is Apected to be reduced by one hour per week for each of two secretaries at this site. 49,00 Re-Key Benefit (4)(12.25) ` BENEFIT $49.00 6. New Tasks Two specific applications whose benefit can be quantified are load forecasting and forms analysis. Computerized load forecasting benefits can be pra.ced at the amount of savings effected in capital expenditures Flare it is ea4lmated that capital expenditures are within two (2) percent of their optimum level. Further, it is estimated that the proclivity to underspend is twice as great as that of overspending, and computer-assisted forecasing will diminish overall error by ten (10) percent. To simplify analysis, only the cost of overspending is used to calculate benefit. Total Error , (51196,000)(.02)/12 ■ $8,660 Overspending Before (8,660)(.33) X $21858 Overspending After (2 , 858) 9) $21572 Gross Benefit $286 Less Labor (240)(7,21)/12 $144 NET BENEFIT $142 The secretarial staff currently spends about twenty-five (25) percent of their time processing forms. A flow analysis to be executed with the microcomputer is expected to eliminate fifteen (15) percent of this labor, Secy. Labor Before (.25)(1,960) $490 Less Labor After (.85)(490) 417 Gross Benefit $73 Less Project Labor 40(7.21)/12 24 NET BENEFIT $49 Total Monthly Benefits Billing Analysis $85.92 Rate Analysis $62.06 Quantitative Analysis $194.92 Budget Composition $40.73 Word Processing $49.00. New Tasks $191.00 TOTAL $623.63 7. 1 114 SERVICE CENTER This site will require an IBM Displaywriter, an IBM PC•XT, a controller and modem, and a letter-quality printer. Software needs include Lotus 123, Wordstar, Spellstar and Mail/merge packages. This system will serve the two Assistant Directors, three divisionsal Superintendents, two electrical engineers, and one civil engineer, as well as their technical avid clerical staffs Below, intended applications are given, and their benefits are quantified by month. Word Processing ' A word processing center will be established at this site. Joint-use of a Displaywriter by secretarial staff is expected to preclude the need for an additional C-5 employee. C-5 Labor Cost Before $920.40 C-5 Labor Cost After "0- BENEFIT $920,40 Utility System Data Retrieval and maintenance of data pertaining to work orders and customer and contractor inquiries is currently performed by Assistant Directors and technical personnel. The Wtr/WW Asst. Director estimates he and a T-2 employee each spend forty (40) hours a month on this task. The Electric Asst. Director estimates his time on this task at about twenty (20) hours a month, and estimates his two Superintendent spend a similar amount of time in this activity. Putting this data on a computerized spreadshlet will allow current participants to reduce their involvement time by ninety (90) percent by shifting most of the task to the secretarial staff. After computerization, secretarial staff will spend ap?roximately one half hour a day each, or forty (40) ;pours a month total, performing this task. 8. 1 Wtr/WW Dir. Labor Before (40)(16' 15) $646.00 Labor After (.1)(646) 4060 Wtr/WW Air. GROSS BENEFIT $581.40 T-2 Labor Before (40)(7.07) $282-80 T-2 Labor After (.1)(282.80) 28.28 GROSS BENEFIT $254,52 Elec.Dir. Labor Before (20)(20.38) $407.60 76 Elec.Dir. Labor After (.1)(407.60) 40. _ $366.84 GROSS BENEFIT' Two Sup ts. Labor Before (20)(31.44) $628.80 Two Supts. Labor After (.1)(278.60) 62.88 GROSS BENEFIT ' $565.92 Sum Gross Benefits $1,768.68 Less Secretary Labor (40)(23.88) = 955.20 NET BENEFIT $813.48 Bud& C_ osi~tion As in the case of the Utility Administration Office, users of the PC at the Service Center can reeuce the time required for this task by at least fifty (50) percent through use of integrated spread-sheet software. The Water/Wastewater Asst. Director, Electric Asst. Director, and three on-site Superintendents are estimated to spend twenty-four (24) hours per year each on this activity. Wtr/WW Asst.Dir.Labor Before (24)(16.15)/12= $32.30 40.76 Elec.Asst. Dir. Labor Before (24)(20.38)/12= M/S Supt. Before (24)(17.51)/12■ $35.02 E/D Supt. Before (24)(13.93)/12= $27.86 W/WW Supt. Before (24)(12.54/12= 25.08 SUM LABOR BEFORE $161.02 Less-Labor After (.5)(161.02)s 80.51 BENEFIT $80.51 Graphics Three technical peison~oducing graphicpmaterialu that Xcould percent of their time manually p be produced by use of a microcomputer. Efficiency is estimated to improve at least seventy-five' (75) percent for this task after computerization. 9• Droft'speople Labor Before (,06)(30445) $206,68 +Loss Labor After (*25)(206s68 1.67 BENEFIT $155001 New Tasks In his role as Vice President of the Planning Engineers Microcomputer Users Group, the Electric Asst, Utility Director has lined up IBM compatible software that will be used to increase capital efficiencies, The first project aims at reducing electric system power loss by minimizing the loss due to high power factor conditions. Currently, the system loss is about six (6) percent. At minimum, the analysis is expected to enable an improvement of .5 percent in power loss. 'Power Loss Before (,06)(5431518,439)/12 r 2,717,592KWH Less Power Loss After (,995)(2,717,592) a 21704,004KWH Power Recovered 13,588KWH Gross Be-aefit (.05)(13,588) $679,40 Less Labor (10.83)(120)/12 108,30 NET BENEFIT $571.10 A second project is to use a program to find the optimal mix of on-line transformers. The Asst. Utility Director estimates that this program will at least reduce transformer expenditures by five (5) percent. Currently, annual expenditures are approximately $300,000 for this item. Gross Benefit (.05)(300,000)/12 $12250.00 Less Labor (10,83)(480)/12 $433.20 BENEFIT $816.80 a Total Monthly Benefits Word Processing $229.25 Ut. System Data $813.48 - Budget Composition $80.51 Graphics $155.01 New Tasks- $12387.90 " OTAL MONTHLY BENEFITS $2,666.15 10,. • 1 III. ELECTRIC PLANT This site will require one IBM PC-XT and one dot matrix printer. Software requirements will include Lotus 123, Wordstar, Spellstar and Mail/merge packages. Below, benefits are by month, Adm~inistrgtive Rgpo_rtina Date maintenance and retrieval for City reports and Federal and State regulatory compliance reports is estimated to take six (6) percent of nine employees' time per month. Computerization is expected to improve efficiency by at least thirty-three (33) percent. Labor Before (.06)(23,159.16) $1,389.55 Less Labor After (.66)(1,389.55) 917.10 BENEFIT $472.45 1 Maintenance And Inventory Schedules, Manual upkeep of various maintenance and inventory schedules is estimated i:o require an additional five (5) percent of these employees' time, Improvement is estimated to be at least thirty-three (33) percent after using computer equipment. Labor Before 1.05)(23,159.16) ■ $1,157.96 Less Labor After (.66)(1,157.96) x 764.25 BENEFIT $393.71 New Tasks The Plant Assistant Superintendent will employ an inventory management program that will optimize inventory stock levels. Inventory is valued at $3,000,000 and is estimated toobe within two (2) percent of the optimal level. Further, proclivity for understocking is expected to be equal that of overstocking, and the optimization program is expected to diminish overall error by ten percent. To simplify analysis, only the cost of overstocking is used to calculate benefit. Total Error (3,000)000)(.02)/12 $50000 Overstock Before (5,000)(-5) $2,500 Overstock After (2,500)9) $29250 GROSS BENEFIT $250 Less Labor (80)(10.88)/12 $72 NET BENEFIT $178 11. Total Monthly Benefits Administrative Reporting $472045 7 M61 Schedules $393*71` New Tasks $178,00 TOTAL MONTHLY BENEFITS $.1,044.1.6 A I 12. r IV. WATER PLANT This location will need one IBM PC-XT and one dot matrix printer. Software requirements include Lotus 123, Wordstar, Spellstar, and Mail/merge packages. Administrative Reporting Data maintenance and retrieval for reports to the City and various regulatory agencies absorbs a great deal of employees time, ,The plant Superintendent' and the plant Foreman respectively spend sixteen (16) hours and forty (40) hours per month on this type of activity. A T-4 employee also spends fort, (40) hours per month in report composition. Computerization is expected to reduce the time required by thirty-three (33) percent for each position,, Supt. Labor Before (16)(15.56) $248.96 Foreman Labor Before (40)(9.37) $374.80 T-4 Labor Before (40)(8.87) 354.80 Sum Labor Before $978.56 Less Labor After (.66)(354.80) 234.17 BENEFIT $744.39 New Tasks The installation of a computerized maintenance scheduling routine at this site will make it possible to extend the present maintenance schedule to include equipment that was previously not on the schedule. The value of currently unscheduled *equipment is approximately $1,000,000, and its useful life is on average about ten (10) years. Inclusion on a routine maintenance schedule is expected to preserve equipment life by fifty (50) percent. Parts and labor for the additional maintenance is estimated -at eighty (80) percent of the equipment cost. 13. Unscheduled Equip. Before (10000,000)/(10)(12)n $8,333 Unscheduled Equip.After (100001000)/(20)(12)• 4 166 Gross Benefit $4,167 Less Parts & Laborww(1,000,000)(o8)/(20)!12) $3$33 Less Analyst Labor (8.87)(40) MW 3.54 9 NET BENEFIT $480 Total Monthly Benefit Administrative Reporting $744,39 New Tasks 480.00 TOTAL $1,224.39. 14. i r V. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND MUNICIPAL LABORATORY This site will require an IBM PC-XT and a dot matrix printer. Software requirements include Lotus 123, Wordstar, and Spellstar packages. Seventy-five (75) percent of the cost of this equipment will be borne by the Federal Govexrunent in relation to its grant for the City's Industrial Pretreatment Program. ,Administrative Reaortinz ' At the Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Superintendent and an M-2 employee each spend about twenty-four (24) hours a month in developlag, maintaining and graphically depicting report-related data. At 'the Municipal. Laboratory, a T-4 employee spends twenty-five (25) hours a month engaged in similar activities. Computerization is expected to reduce task time by at least thirty-three (33) percent. Supt. Labor Before 24(13.83) _ $331.92 M-2 Labor Before 24(9.35) _ $224.40 T-4 Labor Before 25(9.77) = 244.25 Sum Labor Before $800.57 LESS Labor After (.66)(800.51) 528.38 BENEFIT $272.19 New Tasks The present value of inventory at the Wastewater Treatment Plant is estimated at $65,000. Further, it is estimated that current levels are fully a third greater than the optimum level. By computer-assisted analysis, the Superintendent believes he could reduce inventory overstocking by at least fifty (50) percent. Overstocking Before (65,000)(.33)/12 = $1,787.50 Overstocking After (1787.50)(.5) = 893.75 Gross Benefit $893.75 Less Labor (120)(9.35)/12 = 93.50 NET BENEFIT $800.25 15. v Total Monthly $enefies Administrative Reporting $272,19 New Tasks 800.2 TOTAL $1,072044 A 16. 1 VI. SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION Ti_ mfg The Utility Director requests all systems be on-line as soon as possible and in any event, requests delivery by no later than December 1, 1983. Cost and Funding Total equipment cost is estimated at $37,563.66. This cost is based upon the outright purchase of PC-related devices and a sixty month lease/purchase agreement at ten(10) percent APR for the Displaywriter, daisy-wheal printer, modem, and controller devices. Particular costs of equipment and the respective accounts prom which funding has been approved are detailed in the following table. SITE DEVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT Util. Admits. PC, Software, 0250-9229-E21 $7,733.20 and Printer Svc. Center PC, Software, 0250-9229-E21 $3,866.60 and Printer 0450-9103 $3,866.60 Displaywriter, 0250-9229-E21 $2,818.54 Printer, Modem, 0450-91-03 $1,879.02 Controller Elect. Plant PC, Software, 0251-'9229-E $7;733.20 and Printer Water Plant PC; Software, 0460-91-03 $5,000.00 and Printer 0460-91-06 $2,733.20 Lab and WWTP PC, Software, 624-8-480- $7,733.20 and Printer 8502-99 Less Fed. Grant ($5,799.90) Total Cost $37,563.66 17. xr V Inlernatlonal Business Machines Corporation 272f'L8J Freeway P.O. Box 540921 Dallas, TX 75234 2141620-6100 January 20, 1984 Purchasing Department City of Denton 215 East McKinney Street Denton, TX 76201 Dear Sir, Thank you for the opportup'ty to respond to your bid request, 4!9234, for Personal Computers, Printers,.and Software. IBM is pleased to respond and a completed proposal is attached. I am happy to offer the City of Denton -a 27% discount off the regular purchase price through an agreement between IBM and the State of Texas. Prices can be found in attachment A. We at *IBM look forward to your decisirn, Sincerely, 0 .9 'i Scott Collier Marketing Representative - National Marketing Division r 2GMG.0204.2 Btu i,utlf~ yzsa DID PROPOSALS rtgc 2 of 2 DESCRIPTION - YQUAN. PR1CE Ar.l 1. Personal computers capable of being fible to communicate 9 ea. $ 5920.30 $53 with and I.B.M. 4331 computer via a-n X.B.M. 3274 con- troll.r or equivalent controller using only DOS/VSE & CICS. (Tha City of Denton does not intend installing a local nlatwork.) The personal computers must have a minimum of 128K RAM memory, capability to producs-aolor graphs on a color monitor, and xapable of performing a minimum of one host computer oriented task while con- currently processing a personal computer program such as Lotus 1-2-3. The personal computer must also come faith one (1) Floppy disk drive and one (1) 10 Megabyte Hard 'Disk Drive and the associated operating system software. *Q,trrent1 y graph os support i s not avat 1 abl a. See ~~~~oota bel tw. 726, 35 S 6 2. Color monitors capable of being attached to item f/1. 9 ea. 3. Software packages known as lotus 1-•2-3 and Wordstar, 9 ea. $T;- $ Ma•lltnerge, Speller. See Attachment A 4, riot Matrix printers capable of printing 132 clinracters 9 ea. $ 434.35 $ 3 per line and at a 100 characters per second. 5152 Model 2 Graphics Printer at_80 cps, $ 5. TOTAL OF ALL OF THE ABOVE 6. All of the above items should be Lid as follows: $ A. Outright purchase price (items 1 through 4) 9 ea $ 'Att. A At _ B. 24 month leese/purchase (items 1 through 4) 9 ea. $1t~ $A C. Monthly maintenance cost (items 1 through 4) 9 ca. $ Att. $At D. Any installation cost. Customer responsibility. 9 ea E. Delivery costs. (5271, 5272, and 5152) 9 ea. $--65.00 $ Costs are estimates. Actual costs may vary. NOM: 1 ti 1 e graph cs support is currently available, 1119 has aruiotaiced i is statement of di recta on to support graphs cs l tin graphs es support is announced, you W) l be notified. - TOTALS-- Nle quote the above f.o.b. Denton, Texas. Shipment can be made in._ _days from receipl of order, Terms net unlcssotherwisaindicatad. * Delivery schedules have not been announced. In submitting the above bid, the vendor agrees that acceptance of any or all bid items by the City of Denton, Texas within a reasonable pe.l iod of tintf constitues a contract. 2727 L6J Freeway Branch Office GMG - IBM Wiling AdOecis bidder Dallas, TX 75234 elly Slale~ ZIP J~Sgn~wl! 214/ 620-6037 Marketing Representative ._.-•11111 'i t1l ph bn! ATTACHMENT A CI'T'Y OF DENTON BID #9234 PRICE SUMMARY UNIT MODEL DESCRIPTION qTY PRICE -27%) TOTAL 5271 006 3270-PC w/Keyboard 9 $7180 $5241.40. $47172,60 1003 64KB Memory Module 9 165 120.45 1084.05 1013 64/256 Memory Expansion 9 350 255.50 2299.50 5612 Printer Cable 9 55 40.15 361.35 1505 Control Program 9 300 219.00 1971,00 4061 DOS 2.0 9 60 43.80 392.40 SUB-TOTAL $5920.30 $53282,10 5272 001 Color Display 9 995 726.35 6537.15 5152 002 Graphics Printer (80 cps) 9 595 434.35 3909.15 SOFTWARE 9047 1-2-3 Lotus (PN 06811325) 9 495 361.35 3252.15 4039 Peach Text by Peachtree 9 400 292,00 2628.00 Wordstar/Mailmerge/Spellstar has been withdrawn. - Eligible software may be purchased for a 27% discount if included with the 3270 PC order. Purchase of IBM machines will be by the agreement for purchase of TBM machines-State and Local Government, signed by the customer and IBM. 2GMG.0204.2 ATTACHMENT n CITY OF DENTON HID 119234 24 Month Lease/Purchaset Through the use of IBM's State and Local Government Installation Payn.int Agreement, the City could structure the following terms: Downpayment: $0 Number of Months: 24 Interest rate: 10% MONTHLY UNIT I.TY PRICE PAYMENT 5271 9 53,282:70 2438.41 5272 9 61537.15 299.16 5152 9 3,909.15 178.90 Termination: May be terminated at the end of fiscal period of funds are sought but not appropriated Insurance: Owner's responsibility Property Taxes: Owner's responsibility, if applicable 2GMG.0204.2 - ATTACHMENT C CITY OF DENTON BID (19234 MAINTENANCE CHARGES WARRANTY EXTENSION REPAIR CENTS ANNUAL TERM MINIMUM USE CHA (A) (E) (A) (E) 5271 Model 6 80 Base unit w/ keyboard $466 $723 $350 $598 (A) (B) (C) (D) (A) (B) (C) (D) 5272 Color Monitor. $65 $55 $70 $90 $49 $41 $53 $68 8n 5251 Graphics Printer $40 $40 $50 $63 $30 $30 $41 $55 (A) Customer Barry-in repair (119821) ' (B) Customer carry-in exchange (119816) (C) Customer on-site exchange (119824) (D) IBM on-site exchange (119830) (E) IBM on-site repair (119797) Wartanty: ° Three-month warranty IBM On-site service* (5271, 5251 and 5272) Nine-month warranty extension available Note: The IBM Personal Computer elements of the workstation may have different warranty, These warranties may be upgraded to on-site service for an additional charge, Maintenance offering: ° Annual service offerings* (Amendement for IBM Service/Exchange Center Services and IBM Maintenance Agreement) - Customer Carry-In Repair (5271 and 5272) The customer will deliver the failing machine to a designated IBM service/exchange center and, when it is repaired, pick up and return the repaired machine to the customer's location, connect it, and verify its operation. - Customer Carry-in Exchange (5272) IBM will have an exchange machine available for the customer at a designated IBM service/exchange center, The customer will deliver the failing machine to the IBM center, pick up the exchange machine, and take it to the customer's location, connect it, and verify its operation. 2GMG.0204.2 January 20, 1984 Page 2 Customer On-Site Exchange (5272) IBM will have an exchange machine delivered to the customer's location. The customer will disconnect the failing machine, connect the exchange machine, and verify its operation, The customer will follow IBM's instructions regarding the return of the failing machine; the return will be at IBM's expense. IBM On-Site Exchange* (5272) IBM will disconnect the failing machine, connect the exchange machine, verify its operation, and remove the failing machine from the customer's location IBM On-Site Repair* (5271) IBM will repair the failing machine at the customer's location and verify its operation. The 5271 keyboard will be repaired or exchanged at IBM's option. * Service means exchange or repair at IBM's option, Service is available only during normal IBM business hours at the machine's location. On-site service is available in areas. Note; In the above carry-in offerings, the customer, in lieu of delivery, may ship the failing machine prepaid in the original shipping container, or equivalent, to a designated IBM service/ exchange center and, upon request, IBM will ship the exchange or repaired machine back prepaid to the customer locations within the United States and Puerto Rico. ° Time and materials service may be obtained by calling the Service/Exchange Communications Center's toll free number 800-428-2569. From Hawaii or. Alaska, call collect (312) 986-7451. The center will direct customer to carry or mail the failing unit to the nearest service/exchange center offering time and material repair. 2GMG.0204.2 CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM T0l The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMi Hill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant DATEi January 31, 1984 SUBJECT1 AIRPORT OFFIGS LEASE AGREEMENT I have attached for your consideration copies of a proy,osed lease agreement with Mr, Louis Hubbert (Consultant Services, Ltd.) for use of office space in the Airport Terminal Building. This office was provi- ously occupied by Mr. Ray Testa for his itircrnft parts distribution business. Mr. Testa has recently moved from this area, resulting; in the vacant office space. Mr. Hubbert has requested this lease for the purposes of operating his own business. Mr, Hubbert is primarily engaged in the business of agricultural consultation and the sale of agricultural supp.Liss. This type of activity soems to be compatible with our use of the building and will have no detrimental impact on our operations. Unfortunately, we have been unable to get the Airport Advisory Board together to formally consider this Item. We have discussed this lease with each member of the Board via the telephone, and each member has expressed their support for this agreement. Therefore, we would recom- mend that the City Council approve this lease agreement and allow Mr. Hubbert to utilize this office space. Should you have any comments or questions on this matter, please let us know, Bill Angelo THE. STATC OF TEXAS 4 LEASE AOREEMENT COUNTY OF DENTON 4 This lease is made between the City of Denton, Texna, A home rule municipal corporation, as Lessor, and Mr. Louie Hubbert, doing business An Cnnaultant Service Associates, Ltd. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee and Lessee hereby hires from Lessor, offico space as presently constituted (hereinafter called "premises") in the City of Denton Airport Administration Building located at the Denton Municipal Airport, herein referred to as office "B" as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The office space is leased for a period of one (1) year, commencing on the day of , 1984, and ending on the day of 1984, under the terms contained havoin, However, either party may cancel this lease upon thirty (90) days • advance written notice to the other party, The Lessee shall pay to the Lessor the monthly rental of Ono Hundred Dollars ($100,00), due and payable in full, in advance, on the first day of each calendar month, All monthly rental and any notice of cancellation to Lessor shall be addressed or made payable to the City of Denton and delivered to the Denton Municipal Airport Mnnager at his office or such other place As the Lessor may designate in writing. Lessee shall commit no act of waste and shell tnko good care of the premises and fixtures and appurtenances therein, And that at the ex- piration of the lease, peaceable possession of the said premises shall be given to the Lessor in an good condition as at the beginning of this lease, usual wear And tear, damns. by fire, and acts of Cod or the elements excepted. Lessor shall furnish heating, air conditioning, and necessary electricity for Lighting And the operation of jaunt office machines, Lossor shall have the right of access at reasonable tir.~es for examining • and ranking repair, to snid promises. RASE ACWRENT/PACL: OV. M Lossoo shall not engage in, nor Vomit any third party to engage In, Lila following Aativitios! 1. Avionic Sales and Services 2. Selling of Pilot Supplies 3. Operation of. A Flight School 4. Aircraft Storage 3. Aircraft Haintonance 6, Aircraft Sales 7, Aircraft Rebtal 8. Aircraft Charters 9. Fuel Sales 10. Overnight or monthly tie-down rentalu. Leases shell not assign nor sublet this lease nor a,iy part thereof without first obtnining the written consent of Losaor, Time is of the essence of this lease with respect to the perfor- mance by the Lessee of its obligations heroundar. The covenants horein shall extend to and be binding upon the hairs, executors and administrators of the porous to this leoea. Lessoo'e failure to core n broach of any of the eovennnts and conditions contained herein after t'airty (30) days written notice of such branch shall constitute Ali automatic termination of this loaas And any and all of Losseo'a rightt horoundee shall oeaue. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this LuASe Agroemont have hereunto net their hands on this the _ day of 19S4. LOUIS 11UBBERT, d/b/a CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CONSULTANT SERVICES LESSOR ASSOCIATES, LTD., LESSEE BYs BY: LOUIS HURBERT RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR F. 0' BOX 51 KRUM, TEXAS 16249 ATTEST: CIlARLUTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: • C. J. TAYLOR, JR,, CITY ATTORNrY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS nr: LRASL AOREPMP.dT/PACE. TWO I I~ I f~ f I I ` I I . 1 ~ LOt3GY 1i f.l IAISIES H RE9TlU~S OFFIGE OFFICE u[i° "Au 1 I ~ ~ ,1 ~tGN5 f fU:SPI~A~I 1r II ' I)t2P" AMTCIPAL AIRPOW I 4 I'HfLirML TAYOW fI I ~ I CITY OF DENT.ON MEMORANDUM TO: The Mayor and Members of the CIq Council FROM: Bill Angelo, Senior Administrative Assistant DATFi January 31, 1984 SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT ON THE POLICE BUILDING RFNOVATiON PROJECT As you know, the Police Building Renovation Project is virtually com- plete. Traditionally, the final payments on construction projects have been brought before the Council to signify the acceptance and close-out of the project, Although the primary purpose of this item is the consideration of final payment in the amount of $28,422,01 and to adjust the existing purchase orders, we feel it is alsc necessary to provide a summary report on the expenditures involved in the project, As we have reported previously, we have anticipated some significant cost overruns in this project, The original contract price on this project was $1,089,000 as approved by the Council when the bid was awarded to Taylor Hall Construction Company, The total project cost is estimated at $1,193,130,29, which is $104,130.29 over the original contract price. These overruns are attributable to two major factors which include: the cancellation of the original Taylor Hall contract and the subsequent switch in project management; and, the numerous change orders executed by Council and Staff due to job conditions and other factors, The following is a brief summary of the impact of these factors on the cost overruns, TAYLOR HALL/SWITCH IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT When it became evident that it would be necessary to cancel. the Taylor Hall contract, a settlement agreement was agreed upon and executed by both parties, in this agreement, Taylor Hall stated that they had $57,000 in outstanding invoices on the project which would need to be paid. The City agreed to pay these invoices direct to the vendors to insure that they were paid. In turn, the City deducted this same amount from the invoice which Taylor Hall claimed the City owed them. As it turned out, Taylor Hall actually had $93,500.29 in outstanding invoices which the various vendors submitted to the City for payment, We were unable to find any representatives from Taylor Hall to pursue this difference, All of the invoices were reviewed and checked to insure that the materials and services had gone into our project, Thus, the City felt obligated to stand good for these items. The total overrun from this area was $36,500,29, H"I L PAYMENT ON THF, POLICE LUIUDINC RENOVATION PROJECT January 31, 1984 Page Two Shortly after taking over the management of the project, we discovered that the original budget used by Taylor Hall had excluded several items in the project, The most significant of these omissions included the masonry work, B/R glass, hollow metal door frames, light-weight block, etc, The total overrun from this area was approximately $23o799,67, I might point out that this discovery substantiated our fears that Taylor Hall would not have been able to complete the project for the original contract price and could have defaulted on the contract without the adequate performance bonds, Another factor which contributed to the overrun was the switch in project management. The cancellation of the Taylor Hall contract loft the City with a major construction project: without adequate project management, To resolve this situation, the Council approved a con- struction management contract with Construction Management Conaultants (Stone & Bates), The total cost of the service was $76,000, This item was a non-budgeted item relative to the original contract price. The total cost of these factors was approximately $136,299.96, CHANGE ORDERS During the project we were faced with several change orders which were necessitated due to job conditions and practicality, We knew, going into the project, that there would be some change orders due to the fact that the original building plans were not available during the prepara- tion of the remodeling plans, In addition, we knew that the initial demolition phase of the project would reveal structural items which tied not been anticipated in the remodeling designs, The two major change orders on the project were necessitated by practi- cality and were brought before the Council for consideration. These items included the addition of the South Stairway and the revisions in the HVAC system for energy conservation purposes, The total cost of these change orders was $20,435, As previously stated, there were numerous change orders necessitated by job conditions, All of these items were minor in nature, but the great number of these change orders added significantly to the cost of the project. The total of these change orders was estimated at $31,219.42, These items ranged in price from $21,00 to $2,900,00, and included such things as; rerouting plumbing, adding fire dampers to meet code, rerouting electrical wiring, repair of windows and wall due to vandal- ism, security fence rental, subcontractor bonds, additional jail lockers to meet standards, etc, The total cost of these change orders was approximately $51,654.42. FINAL. PA'1'MFNT ON THE POLICE BUII.UINO RENOVATION PROJECT January 31, 1984 Page Three The total cost of all these overruns was estimated at $187054,38. As you may notice, the actual overexpenditure relative to the original contract price was only $104,130,29. The difference of $83,824.09 is attributable to the various cosy savings we experienced in some parts of the project, As you know, we have deleted some of the non-easential parts of the project, such as the concrete paving in the parking lots and we performed some of the work with existing employees to cut costs, Overall, we are very pleased with the project and we feel very fortunate that the problems with the original contract did not have a greater negative impact, Although we exceeded the original contract price, funds are available to cover the overrun. These funds have been gen- erated from the interest earned on the original bonds which were sold for the project. Therefore, we would recommend that the City Council approve the final payment on the project and authorize the staff to adjust the original purchase orders to reflect the total project cost. Should you have any questions or desire ar more detailed information, please let us know, Bill Angelo ..ion CERTIFICATE 01~ AUTHENTICITY Owosso" THI$ IS TO CERTIFY that Iho mlcrophntopraphc appeorlnp on Ihlo Film File CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET 02 07/84 fdndln~ with CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET ah accvma and complsto raprodvctlonw of 1he records of (Company and pop14) CIT... . ~ ENTON CITY SECRETARY „ac dolivond in 1ho roqular course of buclnotii for pholoprophlnno M Is further cortlnod 1hol the Mlagpholpprpphle proeocroc wars accomplIOMW In a rnannw and on Alm which msalc with rojulromonlc of Iho Nolloh I bwroeu of Slandomdc lw pormanonl mlcrophotogrop:i1c ropy. i ' ~ e. Records Compfi+ X-~ 161) T(CH(101OGY A11K9)V( Pl.ACE~ a►a v.Q t`Park B" Steto Allinmon, To"s 76010