Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-05-1984 LEGAL NOTICE On June 5, 1984, at 7:00 p.m., the City Council of Denton? Texas will conduct a public hearing in the City Council Chamber at 215 E. McKinney St. and consider a resolution concerninq the designation of a blighted area in Denton. This action is required to obtain Industrial Development Bonds. Industrial Revenue Bonds are tax exempt bonds which provide industrial and commercial businesses funds for expansion or construction to improve the, community, These funds provide lower than market interest rates. The following is a description of the boundaries for the proposed blighted area in Dentoni PROPOSED BLIGHTED AREA DESIGNATION North Boundary - Collins Street West Boundary - Cleveland Street South Boundary - North boundary of the 510 Apartments property (formerly the Yucca Motel) East. Boundary - Fort Worth Drive A w,q) of these boundaries is posted at City Hall at 215 E. McKinney. If you have any questions concerning the public hearing or blighted area designation, please contact the City Manager's Office at 566-8342. May 18, 1984 Zmi !1 f . i kit - J-1 . J, wul ~ 4 41 IU~,IUI1 r 1 r _ 1r_a~~ .~f_~ 1~~'1 1~1A1YfIJl1 ~ 111 P wY~ / Wv411 ~1 ~I ^71 ~ I ``I,1 t l!N► § 1 Z~F , ~>!Y! Y:1L4i ~~wii.w lii.~ . DE) f r 4~ VIt~Y ,I ~ I ~ `rla!4 1~,-°-_1l I j~I y~l _ - - y. ~ yw4ta~ ff[ 1 1~ ~ .J ~~I.__•---__.41I ~ ~ -I~ 1 ~...,...,._t11MWbt l: blL `1416 4uJ nmnL sia_ ~Jl3s►.) M 7 [-.I i~ ~unn L211 _ El c-b~ k _ ci __~~.~i ~ II I{III' "l~l~a) ~'I - ED ED F 7 ~i~M • 5 ,•`V ` 1 r all* `t~ec t~ ((1~{{~~ l ~ 1 ~ YLIIyYIY\ 1 1 ~ 4 t d 1u 1 Il'l,.`~_ ~ 1.-___ '1411YYL~-~~Ll~ r \ 1 r 1~ / . I, NIt.1 VJII 11r 1 .J L. \ Y1 11 / _ 1 ♦t 0 AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL June 5, 1984 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 5, 1984, at 5:30 p,m, in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. 1. Receive a report on retiree insurance. 2. Discussion of Planninq and Zoning Commission processing times. 3. Discussion on Flow Memorial Hospital and Library funding. 4. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board AppoLitments Under Sec. 2(g), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 5, 1984, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of January 31, 1984. 2. Consent Agenda: Euch of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. is City of Denton City Council Agenda June 5, 1.984 Page Two A. Bids and Purchase Ordersi 1. Bid # 9254-1 - Modular furniture 2. Bid # 9273 - Circuit bxeaker conversion 3. sid # 9285 - utility marking system 4. Bid # 9286 - Pothole patch machine 5. Bid # 9287 - Brush chipper 6. Bid # 9288 - 6011 cut mo%qer 7. Bid # 9289 - Concrete saw 8. Bid # 9295 - Office furniture 9. Purchase Order # 63108 to Bailey Muter Company in the amount of $3,514.00. 10. Purchase Order # 63396 to Gaylord Brothers Inca. in the amount of $4,980.00. 11. Purchase order # 63471 to Anacomp Micrographics in the amount of $5,000.00. B. Plats and Replats; 1. Approval of the preliminary replat of lots 3, 4 and 5, block A, of the Lincoln Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Approval of the preliminary replat of lots 1 and 2 of the Adkisson Addition (Denton County Jail). (The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of the preliminary plat of the ::ommerce Center Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of lots 1, 2 and 3, block 1, of the Jannie Street Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) r City of Denton city council Agenda June 1984 Page Three ee 51 Approval of the preliminary plat Of Section E of thei Windsor Park Addition. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of the Parks and Recreation Department comprehensive master plan. (The Parks and Recreation Board recommends approval.) 4. Public Hearingsa the City hearing o Denton on Eligile Blighted Area designations A Public i Revenue Bonds, B. Z-1658. This is the petition of Melvin Haisler requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the general retail (GR) classification on an approximately 0,8 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of FM 2164 (North Locust) and proposed Loop 288, 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the general retail (GR) classification on an approximately 0.8 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of FM 2164 (North Locust) and proposed Loop 288. C. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 81.44 acres of land beginning at Swisher/Shiloh Road. (A-1) D. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of appr-)ximately 522.76 acres of land beginning 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the center- line of U. S. Highway 380. (A-3) E. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 9,013 acres of land beginning approximately 740 feet east of Sherman Drive. (A-4) 5. Ordinances; A. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings on the proposed annexation of approximately 31.335 acres of land located on the east side of North Locust Street. (A-5) • City of Denton City Council Agenda June 5, 1984 Page Four B. Consider adoption of an ordinance restricting the parking between the northern most driveway on the west side of I.O.O.F. to the and of the pavement on I,O.O.F. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Suppc•rt Commission recommends approval.) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the closing and vacating of that portion of 'texas Street beginning 125' east of Rose Street and ending 170' west of Wood Street. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending street- light pro rata charges. (The Public Utility Board recommends approval,) 6, Resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution and accompanying final statement of community development objectives and projected use of funds. B. Consider approval of a resolution declaring certain areas of the City of Denton as blighted for the purpose of allowing the sale of Industrial Revenue Bonds to improve these areas. 7. Consider approval. of a request from RWGP, Inc. for water and sewer service outside the City limits at Page Road and Shiloh Cemetery (southeast of Denton), (The Public Utility Board recommends approval,) 8. Receive a report on electric rate demand charges. 9. Consider authorizing the City Manager to negotiate with -:he Flow Hospital Administrator concerning funding of the hospital. 10. Presentation by the Mayor of a report on pollution. 11. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments • ~i ,City of Denton City Council Agenda June 5, 1984 Page Five 12. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas, C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice: of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1984 at a' clcc:ti • (a.m.) (p..m,)~ v v✓ CITY SECRETARY A CW- on i CITY OF DENTON NTON TEXAS l vt I f x~ri~ l ~ a DENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Pape Introduction 1 Demographics 1 Trends 2 Surveys 3 Standards 5 Recreation Standards b Park Classification/Standards 7 Recommendations 9 Recreation Facility Q 14 Parks/Open Space 'I Adult Sports 1 12 Youth Sports Beautification 2.3 ,a Arts Senior Services 25 Therapeutic Recreation 26 Summary of Recommendations 7 Zone Rec,imitnendat ions 31 ' Funding Possibilities 3 Summary 4 I , I ~ I INTRODUCTION A logical place to begin the presentation of a five-year Master plan is with a short discussion on the need for municipal parks and recreation departments. Municipal leisure service aggencies are charged with providing facilities, programs, and leaderhsip that recognize, promote, and encourage meaningful leisure experiences. Leisure experiences offer the best opportunity for citizens to express themselves in a personally rewarding manner. Recreation is modern society's avenue to actualize self-determination, dignity, and self-worth through positive actions and interactions. Thuje actions and interactions can most readily occur in the place, atmosphere, and company that allow an individual to feel relaxed and confident. A municipal parks and recreation department has un obligation to provide leisure situations that Individuals cannot provide for themselves. Modern urban life has taken away much of the open space and many of the relaxation opportunities that people once took for granted. It is understandable that society is acting to provide some leisure opportunities that enhance the quality of modern life. It is the intent of the Denton Parks and Recreation Department to fulfill the desires of the citizens of Denton in an efficient, effective manner. To reach that goal, the Department intends to maintain the high degree of professionalism necessary to implement, administer, and evaluate its proposals. To provide a framework for that process, the Department has been involved in an evaluation and information gathering mode that we believe will allow an appropriate plan to be presented. DEMOGRAPHICS Denton was established in 1857 on 100 acres of land provided by area donors. In !8661 the Town of Denton became an incorporated city of about four square miles. Geographic growth was slow and inconsistent until it doubled in 1960 from nine to 18 square miles. Consistent annexations since have brought the figure in 1984 to approximately 40 square miles. Population growth has also been inconsistent but always upward. Ranging from a low growth figure of 130, from 1910 to 1920, to a 90.9% in the 1940's. Until the 1960's census, the City had garnered a larger and larger share of the population of Denton County. This figure was as high as 56.6; in 1960. The percentage has fallen off to a 30.6% COG estimate for 1983. In the 1980's, the City has had a population increase of 8,189 people which is a jump of 20.5%. Denton County has had an increase of 75,682 which figures to a percentage rise of 89.2%. - 1 The high growth rates experienced by some of the cities in the southern part of Denton County are not necessarily enviable, The NCTCOG now estimates that the City is growing at a 2.691 annual rate with the County at a rate of 6,221, The rate for the City promotes economic growth and allows for effective municipal planning. It also means that the traditional stability of Denton can effect agreeable, acceptable life style changes for its citizens. The most unique variable in the population figures of Denton is the presence of two state universities. North Texas State University and Texas Woman's University contribute in many ways to Denton. Due to their presence, census data shows art unusually high percentage of residents in the 20-24 age group. The concentration of this age group is also exhibited by the fact that the median age for the City is 24.9 years. This compares to 27 year for Denton County and 28,2 years for the State of Texas. Another revealing statistic is that of size of household. The figures are: City - 2.36; County - 2.77; State - 2.82. Without the effect of the universities, the figures would probably closely reflect the State average. The ethnicity figures for the City have been very consistent, percentage wise. The 1980 census revealed that about 8S1 of Denton residents are white. Small changes in racial proportions are another example of the population stability. Minority citizens are concentrated around the two universities and in southeast Denton. Senior citizens have found Denton to be a favorable place to live. From 1970 to 1980, the 60+ age group increased from 3,908 to 5,479, a 401 Increase. Seniors have found Denton large enough to supply their unique service needs yet small enough not to be too hectic and uninviting. Seniors are now 11,41 of the population of the City, and that percentage will be steadily rising in the future. TRENDS Trends, and their impact on departmental planning, are an important, on going consideration. Trends affect local parks and recreation departments perhaps more than any other city department since the effect is both from a demograpphic and a program preference angle. It is important to be able to differentiate between fads and long-term leisure interest shifts. Parks and recreation departments must be very careful when allocating resources that those resources are soundly invested. Some of the most pronounced trends in municipal leisure service provision are joint use of facilities agreements, fitness and health attitudes, supplying appropriate leisure services to handicapped and aged citizens, and fees and charges revenue enhancements. 2 - Demographically speaking, it is wise to consider any important changes or shifts in the local population. Denton is often described as a white, middle class, well educated, and stable community. Within that framework, it is necessary to keep close observation of changes that might impact on departmental decisions. While the population is stable and local surveys indicate slow-to-change on local issues, there are national. trends that affect everyone. Some of these changes include a higher citizen involvement in government (especially local and state), basic outlook of conservatism, decrease in the size of families with part of that trend being many more single parent families, and governmental agencies acting more as facilitators and less as front-line providers of social services. SURVEYS In writing this plan, the Denton Parks and Recreation Department has relied heavily on information provided by a variety of state and local surveys. Survey techniques have been developed to a point so that extremely valid results nay be obtained through sampling of a small percentage of the total population under consideration. The validity of modern survey techniques allows agencies to confidently use the information gathered. A Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan (TORP) is completed every five years by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. TORP is the result of the Land and Water Conservation Act of 1965; the funds provided by that act are apportioned by the federal government to each state for distribution to local agencies to provide for outdoor recreation. These funds are distributed in Texas by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and usually take the form of 50/50 matching grants. To qualify for these federal monies, each state must complete an outdoor recreation report such as TORP. The report addresses itself to such subjects as statewide issues and recommendations, an inventory of outdoor recreation resources, a discussion of outdoor recreation activities, dei,cits of resources, and outdoor recreation spending. There is also a breakdown of the same types of discussion areas on each of the 24 planning areas. Denton is in planning area four which includes the who Ie metroplex. The following is a list of surveys that were used as an information base in formulating the 5-year plan: 3 State Surveys * 1981 Outdoor Sporting Goods Expenditures in Texas - by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department * Texans Opinions on Parks and Recreation Issues in 1982 by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Local 8urveys_ 1982 Denton Area Recreation Resources Guide - Donlon Parks and Recreation Department 1982 Planning Committee Report Long Range Facility Construction and Major Maintenance Plan :1982-83 through 1986-87 - Denton Independent School District 1982 Denton Survey - James J. Glass 1969 Decisions for Denton - Recreation and Entertainment Committee 1982 Survey of Citizens Attitudes and Use of Denton's Park and Recreation Services and Facilities - Division of Recreation and Leisure Studies, North Texas State University 1982 Denton Recreation and Parks Survey: High S)chool Study - Division of Recreation and Leisure Studies, North Texas State University 1969 Leisure Behavior and Opinions of the Citizens of Denton, Texas 1969 - Denton Parks and Recreation Department 1983 Neighborhood Leisure Needs Survey - Denton Parks and Recreation Department 198: 1983 Denton Survey - James J. Glass, North Texas State University 1983 Community Leisure Facility/Program Inventory Additional resources that should be noted are; Texas 2000 Commission Report and Recommendations - Office of the Governor 1980 Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan (TORP), The State Summary - Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 1980 Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan, The North Central 'texas Region - 'rexas Parks and Wildlife Department - 4 STANDARDS Probably there are few people who realize that standards exist to help parks and recreation professionals in the determination of acceptable amounts of open space and appropriate numbers of recreation facilities. These standards allow local agencies to express current and future resource objectives in quantitative terms. It is hoped that these objectives can be translated into the needed acquisition, improvement, and managemen-c projects that will provide the citizens of Denton with the level of leisure services they desire and deserve. The National Park and Recreation Association has provided a set of standards they describe as a guide to meeting community needs. The standards they have deemed appropriate reflect a great deal of research and professional experience. These standards were last updated in 1982. Using NRPA standards as a basis, and applying information gathered through several surveys, the Denton Department is satisfied that the standards proposed herein are appropriate, attainable, and deserving of consideration. Community standards must satisfy several criteria to serve as a guide for localized planning: * They must reflect the needs of the people in the specific service area. * They must be realistic and attainable. They must be acceptable and useful to both the practitioner and the polleymaker. * They must be based on a sound analysis of the best information available. In conjunction with'a discussion of park standards should be an explanation of the parks classification system. Classifying makes it possible to communicate through usirig the terminology most common around the country. The Denton Parks and Recreation Department uses the NRPA system almost, exactly. - 5 - RECREATION FACILITY GUIDE *AAvailable Existing Outdoor _Facilities Goal*Standard to -Publics _ Variance Soccer Field 1/4,000 13 6 (7) Football Field 1/10,000 5 3 (2) Picnic Shelters 1/2,500 13 10 (3) Picnic Areas 1/1,000 52 24 (28) Baseball Diamond Lighted 1/61000 9 5 (4) Softball Diamond Lighted 1/7,000 7 5 (2) Tennis Courts 1/21500 21 18 (3) Basketball Courts 1/51000 10 7 (3) Handball/Racketball (4-Wall) 1/8,000 6 0 (6) Play Areas 1/1,500 34 24 (10.) Golf Course (18 hole) 1/25,000 2 2 0 Swimming Pool 1/20,000 2.5 1.5 (1) Shuffleboard Lighted 1/5,000 10 0 (10) Horseshoe Lighted 1/5,000 10 0 (10) Volleyball Lighted 1/5,000 10 0 (10) Archery Range Lighted 1/500000 1 0 (1) Amphitheatre 1/50,000 1 0 (1) Shooting Range 1/50,000 1 0 (1) Indoor Facilities Community Recreation Center 1/50,000 1 0 (.1) Disctrict Recreation Center (with gym) 1/1S0000 3 2 (1) Senior Center 1/50,000 1 1 0 Swimming Pool 1/50,000 1 0 (1) Outdoor Education Center 1/50,000 1 3 (1) Based on 1983 COG population estimate of 51,700 **Provded to public by variety oO sources b „ COMPONLNi us( SLRYM A%tA 11lSIRAhl' SIlt ACRES/) 000 USIRAOIC slu ^T mm ON CIIARACTERISjCS f'OPO A I -k_7___._.._._. A. IOCAt/CLOSE•TO- 110HL SPACE; till ighhorhund Park/ Speciallted faclllllni that less than I-mllu 1.5 acres Within nelghborhoods and In cktl,-e Playground • lype I serve a concentrated or radlus, proximity to apartment cw pioao<, limited populalloo or, spoci.• townhouse developaunt or hour ruU flee group such as tots or for the oldorly, ' sanior cititons, total Acroa ge for Typu I d II - Ileighborhuod Park/ 3 acres Play1lro0nd - type ff Area for Intense rocre,itionil l to }•mily 10-t5 acres Suited for intoose davulolanent, activities, such as field radius to curve a Osily accessible to nefghborhuurd games, court games, crafts, population up to population-•geographically ckiov.vred playgground apparatus ores, 5,000 (a ridlgh• with site wali.ing and.blke ar•:.nss, picnicking, wading pools, etc, boeheodl, may be developed Lis a school-p,11vi faculty, conAnunlty fork Area of diverse- anvlrorrnental Sevwril nelghbor• )Os acres 5 acres May Include natural features, ;.uch y quality, May Include areas hoods. I to 2 as water hodlasI and a veal sur°cwd suited for intense recreational in lla radlus, fur intense, devolovnaut, Cis, ) 7C fact If tics, such as athletic accessible to neighborhood sdr•r.ea. complexes, swinrelfig pools, May be all area of natural quality y for outdoor racrealiun, such as N walking, viewing, sitting, to picnicking, May be any combs- nation of the above, oepending upon site suitability and com- munity need. ~ r0lAt. CLUSE•10.11014E SPACE . d ACRES/1,000 POPULW ON r 11. Itf&IOIIAL SPACE: d b Reglonal Park Arad of natural or ornamental SdvevaI cunxnuni- 200r acres S acres Contiguous to or enranpassC-ng :IV quality for outdoor recreation, lies, 1110111- natural resource s , U, such as picnicking, boating, driving time, (ishing, swlevniny, camping, and trail uses; may Include play areas, TOTAL REGIONAL )PACC 5 ACRES/1,000 POPULATIUN C. SPACE WAT HAY 0E LOCAL OR REGIONAL AND IS Litl1Q01 10 EACII COMMUNITY: Llnear Park Area developed for one or Oo applicable Sufficient width Varldble built or natural corridors.. such more varying etudes of reCrea- standard, to protect the as utility rights-of•way, oreff tional travel, such as hiking, resource and pro- IInes, vegetation patterns and biking, horseback riding, vide maximum use, roads, that Iink Other comiru,nonts cross-country skiing, canoeing, of the recreation system ui cam- and pleasure driving, Hay Munily facllilles, such JS ;;haul, include active play areas. IIbrarles, cuamdreial areaa , and (NOTE; any included for any other park areas, of above couponents may Occur in the "Ifnear park.") CUMPOW NI USE' SERVICE AREA DESIRADbE S M ACRES/1,0 DESINABU SITE POPULA11011 CNARACIERISrICS - - special Use Areas for spoclallzed or singgle No applicable Varloble depending Variable Ilithln co+rmunitles, perpor,e recreational aclivilles, standard, on desired sire, suet, as golf caurses, nature renters, marinas, 10056 con. survatories, arboreta, display gardens, arenas, outdoor lhea• Inrs, gun ranges, or downhill ski areas, or areas that pre. sorva, malnlain, and Interpret buildings, sltes, and objects of archeological significance. Also plaza; or squares in or near commercial centers, boule• ~ n vords, parkways. r A V) Conservancy Protecttor, and management of No applicable Sufficient to Variable Variable, depending on the n the natural/cultural envlron• standard, protect tho resource. resource being protected, mount with recreation use as a r secondary objective, b - - - - - - - -.~._--_v_W 0 r z Q) -i n z 0 b x 0 i RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations made within this plan represent a great deal of research, public input, and thorough, professional thinking, Priority decisions are not easy, and there is the realization that we cannot always control the pace or make the final determination as to which projects are funded. However, we believe it is important to make determinations as to what needs we have and the order in which those needs will be mitigated. Not being able to predict when r;.,)urces (through gifts, grants, budget allocation, etc.' will be available, we are making every effort to ensure that those resources are al'1-icated in a logical, fair, best-use manner We also realize that c'rcumstances can change quickly Changes may make It necessary to re-arrange some priorities even to the extent of including, some new projects and excluding some that we now rank highly. AcL.:+g ahead of time gives us an opportunity to consider things in an objective, timely manner. We will do our best to fulfill this plan as presented. Any plan involving so many variables must be dynamic in nature but still able to provide a framework of resource allocation and a measuring tool of departmental achievements, Recreation Facility Recommendations Recommendations for this area were determined by the professional staff in conjunction with the Parks and Recreation Board. Information which helped determine these needs came from two community surveys conducted by North Texas State University, a survey of neighborhood areas in Denton conducted by the Parks and Recreation Department and many interviews with other service providers yin the community. To refine our recommendations we met with the Denton Independent School District, Denton State School, North Texas State University, and Texas Woman's University to discuss their philosophies and needs. We also completed a community inventory of leisure related facilities and programs to give us an initial understanding of existing facilities in the community, Standards were also established in this area to giva us future guidance on facility expansion which is tied into Denton's population growth. These facility recommendations will hopefully aid the Department in focusing on community needs and provide specific goals which we will try to accomplish. Our future expansions will rely very heavily on cooperation with the Denton Independent School District. 1) Community Center: One important recommendation is to provide the community a facility which would be attractive to Denton residents of all ages and interests. It would hopefully become the heart of our community by providing services to a wide range of citizens. It would also enable our residents to have access to year around facilities on a par with the universities which are only available to faculty staff and students. This facility would also meet some special needs of the community by providing the teens a supervised area for them to gather, It would also give all those interested in physical fitness a number of exercise options. The pool would allow a year around water safety program and provide the State School and Denton Independent School District a facility for their students. It would also allow us t o drownproof all of Denton's elementary school children by providing classes at the pool during the school year. The facility envisioned would have a number of meeting rooms and offices, a gym with an indoor running track, conditioning room, racquetball courts, locker areas, indoor pool, gameroom/arcade, snack bar, multipurpose room. This facility would be ideally located in the Mack Park area because it is close to low income areas who do not have adequate transportation, will be the geographic center of town very soon, has good access from other parts of town to McKinney, provides a facility on the east side of town (2 centers on west side), and we already have some development and land at Mack Park. Typical Community Center Floor Plan I 1 ' ' I yJ I , 1 11~ ~ 1 J~. •1•~• + N•►•IN11 r.lll lo.J0••• rr N••• rr r•Ilq bell IN1.1 r••bJ 111 NII61 •YNIy 1041604 04411ag 46 "a 40" 011 41t 'a i l•1 ~ J YN•• + •fl{N wy 4 /N{ 11 1 rim r•• rKI .9 .t •r• I' 1 •1 r•rN r••• •Y••Y /r r•1•I•• r b•Nrr 1••IY•It r 11.1 1 • IJ.11. 1 1 II{l•1 rr •1r~1 • 1•tr1•• fr Llr • (Nlurj 1606 &we& _ .Ill►~ Iw• 4064 . M ;la ••r• •r•• 111 F~• rs'•;yrt "n ` r••h Ir 1•Jl•r• 1 1 ~IYr / I - 1Q - 2) Senior Center Expansion: Another important recommendation is the expansion of the current Senior Center to include numerous offices for staff and other agencies Involved at the center, examination/first aid ro m, game room, cafeteria style kitchen, multi purpose room, ind outside patio/game area, This expansion will help to alleviate the crowded conditions that exist many times as well as provde more space for expanded programs and services I R1r10 rul ClwR►O!C ROOY i I 41 6Wl COMMA / j r Y ROOM CICCN[N . I WtICRAPIS J' Of "01 Or Rlc1 ROOM y "CALTH . 011ICC lCRVIC[! ROOM SHADED AREA REPRESENTS EXISTING FACILITY - lI - 3) School/Center in Northeast Denton: Due to the need for gym space in Denton and specifically in the northeast t.ection, we would propose building on a gymnasium to an existing elementary school site (either Wilson or Ginnings) and allow the school to use it during the school day. We would program the gym and a section of the school on evenings and weekends. This arrangement would provide us added gym space at a far less cost than a recreation center. This would provide benefits to both the Parks and Recreation Department and th'V Denton Independent School District through this cooperative effort. I STORAQZ i L oYMNASIUM OFFICE E%14TINO $0001. ENTRY C 63' - ) I d) Bikeway Duster Plan; This plan would help to define safe routes throughout Denton and encourage an activity that is growing rapidly in popularity. - 12 - 5) School/Center in Southeast Denton; As in northeast Denton, we would propose a school/center be established in Zone 6 when the population of that area reaches 10,000 people. This would add a gym on to Sam Houston Elementary School or another elementary school constructed at a later date. The school/center complex provides for the gyns to be used by the school during the school day and a section of the school as well as the gym to be used by the Recreation Division during the evenings and weekends. This would provide recreation facilities and programs for far southeast Denton. 6) Expand Tennis Center: The tennis center at North Lakes Park will need an office/pro shop as well as expansion of courts from the current six lighted to ten lighted. Supplemental facilities such as lighted outdoor racquetball courts should also be considered. 7) Investigate Expansion of Gun Range: A study should be undertaken to review the need for a gun range that is open to the public ,.it also available for police officer training. 8) Municipal Golf Course Study: A feasibility study should be undertaken when the population of Denton reaches 65,000 to determine the need for another public golf course. 9) North District Pool; When the combined population of Zones 1 and 2 reach 20,:00, build a pool in the Evers Park area. 10) South District Pool; When the combined population of Zones 5 and 6 reaches 20,000, build a pool in the I 13 - Park,Development Advisory Group Recommendations Advisory Group Members: Stove Fanning Susan Hudson Charles Borth Doug Key Stanley Thames Ann Reban Frank Feigert Marcia Henderson Charles Glasgow Bob Tir,kner The advisory group recommendations for existing park development were: 1) Civic Center Park Development of amphitheatre area Renovation of play area Construct overflow parking lot between pool and Senior Center Picnic pavilion Expand garden area and add gazebo Develop landscaping plan Improve irrigation system 2) Mack Park Develop landscaping plan Improve irrigation system Renovation of play area 3) Milam Park Renovation of play area Small shelter Develop landscaping plan Improve irrigation system 4) Jo- Skiles Park Develop landscaping plan Improve irrigation system Renovation of play area Develop picnic area 5) Denia Park Renovation of play area Improve irrigation system Construct new restroom/concession stand Ro-lamp fields, straighten poles Pave and paint parking lot Develop landscaping plan Develop picnic area 14 - b) North Lakes Park Develop landscaping plan Fix drainage problems Improve irrigation system Develop picnic area Renovation of play area Construct soccer complex Deepen lakes 7) Fred Moore Park Develop landscaping plan Renovation of play areas Develop parking lot Improve irrigation system Improve hard surface area Picnic pavilion 8) Phoenix Park Develop landscaping plan Improve irrigation system Install shelter Renovation of play area Develop picnic area 9) Nette Schultz Construct basketball court Install shelter Renovation of play areas Develop landscaping plan Improve irrigation system Bridge over drainage area Develop picnic areas 14) Evers Park Re-lamp fields, straighten poles Develop landscaping plan Improve service road Develop play area (south section) Develop picnic area (south section) Install shelter (south section) Improve irrigation system 11) Bowlin Green [lark Develop landscaping plan Install irrigation system Install shelter Develop ballfield Construct hard surface area/basketball Renovation of play area Develop picnic area - 15 - 12) McKenna Park Develop landscaping plan improve irrigation system Install picnic pavilion Improve parking areas Renovate play areas Improve hard surface area Improve existing shelters Develop picnic areas 13) Carroll Blvd. Develop landscaping plan Improve irrigation system , 14) Woodrow Lane Park Remain as tree nursery until decision to develop 15) Windsor/Stewart Site To be developed after neighborhood needs assessment 16) Cooper Creek Park To remain undeveloped until demand for housing develops in that area 17) Airport Road Park To remain undeveloped until need for the area is, assessed Develop target range if feasible - 16 FACILITY/OPEN SPACE PROJECTIONS FOR MASTER PLAN Neighborhood Community Regional Est. Pop, Park Acres Park Acres Park Areas Total Acres existing 47 150 310 507 52,000 156 260 260 676 55,000 165 275 275 715 58,000 174 290 290 754 610000 183 305 305 793 64,oao 192 320 320 832 670000 201 335 3"5 871 70,000 210 350 350 91.0 Standards: Neighborhood Park 3 acres,/1000 pop. Community Park 5 acres ;1000 pop, Regional Park 5 acres/1000 pop, Type: Neighborhood (Type 1) size 1-5 acres Neighborhood (Type 11) size 10-15 acres Community Park size 30+ acres Regional Park size 200+ acres Facilities: N_elght~orhood (Type 1 6 11) Communit_y_ Regional *Playfields *Athlet.ic fields *Natural areas *Play areas *Play area *Outdoor recreation *Picnic areas *Picnic areas *Special interest *Shelter(s) *Shelters *Hard surface area *Hard surface area *Recreation facilities ExistinE Standard Differonce Zone 1 - Population 4488: Neighborhood Park Acreage 5 13 -8 Community 40 22 +18 Zone 2 - Population 10766: Neighborhood Park Acreage 10 32 -12 Community 0 54 -54 Zone 3 - Population 15532: Neighborhood Park Acreage 0 45 -45 Community 20 75 -55 Zone 4 - Population 10859: Neighborhood Park Acreage 15 33 -18 Community 20 55 35 Zone 5 - PopUlation 4220: Neighborhood Park Acreage 0 13 -13 Community 25 21 +4 Zone 6 - Population 6207: Neighborhood Park Acreage 16 19 3 Community 0 31 .31 - 17 Neighborhood Parks The rationale for neighborhood parks is that all parks and playground facilities cannot be provided in natural areas, i,e,, greenbelts, which in many instances are Ear removed from the residential areas. Facilities near residential areas are required in order to allow individuals to walk from their homes to play tennis, baseball, or engage in other sports. These facilities, along with the schools, should be provided in the neighborhood park/school complex. The concept of joint school-park facilities saves substantial public funds by avoiding the duplication of public effort. ~I Ilk ` y bor L C- i Ele 'enta y Soh •i f~• ••A. • r' At present, there is a clear deficiency of accessible park land in our neighborhood areas. We are approximately 110 acres below standard for this type of open space. Existing neighborhood parks are, . at present, adequately serving only 30$ of Denton's population. To increase that percentage we are proposing the following: 1) Work with the DISD to identify and lease certain tracts of school property to create school/park sites, The City would then maintain and develop these sites with approval of the D1SD. In this way, many new park sites can be secured without any purchase of land, The schools would benefit due to reduced maintenance costs and additional outdoor equipment and facilities for their students. We would suggest that all school sites be considered except the Nigh School, Strickland, Woodrow Wilson, and Norman. This would bring into the park system six new school/park sites and would increase our park services to approximately 50% of the population of Denton, 2) Try to lease land from individuals, businesses, churches, agencies, schools, etc., in or around the priority areas indicated on the park development map. These priority areas are areas that have a high residential density but do not have parks in their immediate areas. If parks could be secured in these areas, we would then be providing adequate park services to approximately 90% of Denton's population. 3) If land cannot be secured on a leased basis as per recommendations one and two, we would propose the City institute a land acquisition program targeting neighborhood park sites. Community Parks Wo also have a deficiency of approximately 100 acres in the amount o!: community park land that should be available. To keep up with recommended development, we are proposing adding on to existing community parks and acquiring new sites in two areas of town. The followiro recommendations will hopefully bring us up to standard: 1) Acquire land adjacent to Evers Park, Mack Park and Denia Park for future development. 2) Acquire two new community park sites in planning areas two and six. These sites should be in excess of 30 acres each and located as centrally in each area as possible. We must also take into account areas of natural uniqueness. Linear Parks Linear parks are a way to provide buffer, beautification and a passive alternative to the more active park areas. These parks are possible on drainage way, utility easements, parkways and 19 boulevards or in open space areas or greenbelts that link community areas. Recommendations in this area include; l) Continue development and beautification of Carroll Blvd. open space areas. If Carroll is extended, these areas should be extended as well. 2) Develop a study of drainage ways, utility easements and greenbelt needs so community facilities can be linked by linear open space areas. 3) Develop parkways/boulevards on new major thoroughfares as they are planned and constructed. University Drive between Bell and Loop 288 may provide this opportunity. 4) Consider landscape setbacks when property owners own property up to curb on major thoroughfares. Special Use Areas Special use areas are areas set aside for specific leisure opportunities. if feasible, develop target range at Airport Park and open to public. 2) Consider Pilot Knob area for park with historic significance. Could possibly use area for petting zoo and museum ofinatural history. 20 - 1 I Adult Sports Recommendations i Advisory Committee Members: Bobby Griffith Bill Chamblee Donna Woods Wayne Hudgens Joe Keahey The various adult sports leagues have recommended that: 1) All adult softball programs be moved to Mack Park, 2) Two additional lighted fields should he constructed immediately. 3) Two more softball fields should be constructed when the need arises. 4) Touch Football and Rugby will continue to use fields at E,rers Park. 21 - Youth Sports Recommendations Advisory Group Members: R. D. Krone Jane Malone Ronnie Roberts Billy Ryan Willie Hudspeth The various youth sports groups recommended that: 1) The 4-baseball/2-football field complex at Evers Park be lighted. 2) The fields at Denia be renovated and re-tamped. 3) Construction of additional practice fields at Evers. 4) construction of rest-room/concession stands at Evers and Denia. 5) Re-surface parking areas at Evers and Denia. I 22 - Beautification Advisory Committee Recommendations Advisory Group Membersi Fred Patterson Jane Mitchell Stanley Lovelace Candice Liepe Mary Ishem Mrs. Wilford Pierce Grant Jacobson Gertrude Gibson Tom Harpool Mrs, F, W. McKnight Delbert Overstrent Roberta Donsbache Charles Hanley Donna Ryan Bob Tickner The Beautification Advisory Groups recommendations included; 1) Identify and landscape visible areas. 2) Tree planting program in parks, 3) Expand irrigation system in parks. 4) Median improvement, .;i University Drive from Carroll to I-35. 5) Plant wildflowers along roadsides. 6) Expand garden area in Civic Center Park. 7) Tree planting program in community. 8) Median improvement on University Drive from Bell to Loop 288. 9) Get business, group, agency support for projects. 10) Establish an ordinance to protect beautification areas. 11) Develop overall beautification the,te for City. 12) City should fund at least one beautification project per year. 13) Start an adopt an area program. 14) Develop ordinances to encourage beautification during development. 15) Adopt minimum standards for builders and developers in regard to beautification- - 23 Greater Denton Arts Council Recommendations The Arts Council recommendations included; 1) Construction of stage and acoustical shell in Civic Center Park. 2) Sculpture garden in Civic Center Park. 3) Joint sponsorship of summer arts festival. 4) Investigate further areas of joint programming, S) Establish a formal process for accepting art for public places. b) Investigate creation of an arts district. 24 Senior Citizens Advisory Group Recommendations Advisory Group Members; Roberta Donsbache Carol Riddlesperger Dr. Cora Martin Dr. Ralph Leach Dr. Bert Hayslip Dr. Marie Fuller Dr. Jean Tague Wanda Knaffle Douglas Wuenschel Deana Nonness Joe E. Cole U. J. Ramsey Ann Cainley Eric Rounsfell Elizabeth Ferring Marian Hamilton Theda Holloway Peggy Fogle Elaine Murphey Pat Kayser Art Shields Patti Sphrem Modena Anderson Tom Fairchild Dr. Steve Applewhite Frank Davila Joe Bryant 0. B. O'Brien Moody Fuller Raymond Pitts Vergie Nimmo Howard Pulliam Fred Coffey George Clements Reba Pilkey The advisory group recommendations included: i 1) Expand program services. 2) Investigate possibility of satellite programs in targeted areas of the city. 3) Expand Senior Center. 4) Establish s networking system with other agencies providing services to seniors. 5) Increase public awareness of senior services. - 25 - Therapeutic Recreation Advisory -Council Recommendations Advisory Council Members: Lloyd Sanborn Jim Maestro Earl P. Fitts Dr. Claudine Sherrill Barbara Allen Barbara Sanchez Loretta May Kathy Peterson Dave Bryant Lynne fie 9lbuth Dr. Jean Tague Joannie Hill Burl Bourland Ann Cummings Mary Zold Kathy Tedrick Mrs, K. E. McIntyre Tom Montelione Marilyn Cooper Recommendations of the advisory council included: 1) Develop year round swim program. 2) Expand arts services for disabled. 3) Provide better access to City pool for disabled. 4) Expand general programs for the disabled. S) Dedicate one FT staff person to this area. b) Identify agencies who provide services. 7) Identify people with disabilities and determine their needs;. 8) Generate greater involvement of disabled in existing programs. 26 - SUMMARY OF RECOM14ENDATIONS FACILITY/PROJECT $ IMPACT *RATING F~guTes"below'Tncac"quTsii~on eve opment+costs onT'y.AAe~'fiigfi"pr on Projects will be reviewed as funding becomes available to *AA - medium prior. determine actual priority of projects at the time. Impact dollar figures, based on 1984 cost estimates. Recreation Facility-_Recommendations 1. Purchase land for community center 500,000 AAA 2. Construct community center 21500,000 AAA 3. Construct school/center in Zone 2 500,000 AAA 4. Expand Senior Center 750,000 AAA S. Bikeway Master Plan 51000 AAA 6. Construct school/center in Zone 6 when population reaches 10,000 500,000 AA 7. Expand tennis center 350,000 AA 8. Investigate expansion of gun range AA 9. Municipal golf course study when population reaches 65,000 AA 10, When Zones 1 $ 2 reach combined population of 20,000, build pool in Evers 600,000 AA 11. When Zones 5 f, 6 reach combined population of 20,000, build pool in southern area of city 6001000 AA Parks/Open SLaSt Recommendations 1. DISD school/parks - 6 sites($S0,000/ site) 300,000 AAA 1. Acquire $ develop 100 acres for neighborhood parks acquisition - 21500,000 in priority areas development - 9001000 AAA 3. Study on linear open space areas 2S,000 AAA 4. Additional development of all existing city parks 1,000,000 AA S. Acquire and develop land near Evers and Denia ($100,000/site) 200,000 AA 6. Acquire 2 new community park sites, 1 in NE, 1 in SE ($400,000/site) 800,000 AA Adult Sports 1. Purchase land at Mack Park 1001000 AAA 2. Build 2 softball fields at Mack Park 2501000 AAA 3. Construct: 2 additional softball. fields as needed 350,000 AA Youth Sports 1. Light 4 baseball/2 football complex at Evers 3001000 AAA 2. Re-lamp and renovate fields at Denia 100,000 AAA - 27 - SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS (contd) FACILITY/PROJECT $ IMPACT *RATING r gures below incfude`acqu sitron-~7evpment costs only. ~7 ^pr or Projects will be reviewed as funding becomes available to *AA - medium prior determine actual priority of projects at the time. Impact dollar figures based on 1954 cost estimates. Youth Sport_s_(Lontd) 3. Develop soccer complex at North Lakes 500,000 AAA Use Evers to: 4. Construct additional baseball/football practice fields 1501000 AA 5. Construct restroom/concession stand 60,000 AA 6. Resurface parking areas 2000000 AA Use Denia to: 7. Construct restroom/concession stand 60,000 AA 8. Re-surface parking area 100,000 AA Beautification Committee Recommendations 1. Identify and landscape highly visible public areas 100,000 AAA 2. Tree planting program in arks 20,000/yr) 80,000 AAA 3. Expand irrigation system in parks ($20,000/yr) 80,000 AAA 4. University Drive median improvement from Carroll to I-35 100,000 AA 5. Plant wildflowers along roadsides ($2,500/yr) 121500 AA 6. Expand garden area in Civic Center Park 50,000 AA 7. Community tree planting program AA 8. University Drive median improvement from Bell to Loop 288 200,000 AA Arts Council Recommendations 1. Construct bandshell in Civic Center Park 2505000 AAA 2. Sculpture garden in Civic Center Park 50,000 AA Senior Services Expand program services 5,000 AAA 1. 2. Investigate satellite programs in targeted areas AA Therapeutic Recreation 1. Develop year round swim program AA 2. Expand arts services for handicapped AA - 28 - ZONE/RECOMMENDATIONS To facilitate planning activities, the Parks, and Recreation Department has divided Denton into planning zones marked by major thoroughfares. The zones fall into logical and relatively homogeneous areas, but because of differences in housing density, it is not possible to have zones of similar population. These planning areas are easily recognizable neighborhoods and communities within the City. In attempting to analyze the recreation needs of the City, it is helpful to divide It into smaller units. The biggest reason for this more localized consideration is to allow for demographic differences from neighborhood to neighborhood. Also, people tend to dislike crossing barriers such as I-35 when they seek parks and recreation services. Planning Area 1 * Light athletic complex at Evers * Re-develop Evers Park * Re-develop North Lakes Park * Expand development at Bowling Green Park * Acquire and develop 10 acres for neighborhood parks * Develop soccer complex at North Lakes * Expand tennis center * Construct district pool Planning Area 2 * Build school/center * Re-develop Nette Shultz * Develop school/park site at Ginnings * Acquire and develop 25 acres for neighborhood parks * Develop one community park * Develop Windsor Drive park site Planning Area 3 * Re-develop McKenna Park Develop school/park sites at Razor and Congress * Acquire and develop 25 acres for neighborhood parks Planning Area 4 * Re-develop Civic Center Park, Fred Moore Park, Phoenix Park, Mack Park and Milam Park * Develop Woodrow Lane site * Acquire and develop 25 acres for neighborhood parks * Develop school/park sites at Davis and Lee * Build bandshell in Civic Center Park * Construct community center in Mack Park area * Construct two lighted softball fields at Mack Park 29 Planning Area 5 • * Re-develop Denia Park * Acquire and develop 10 acres for neighborhood parks * Re-lamp fields at Denia for girls softball Planning Area 6 * Re-develop Skiles Park and Briercliff Park * Acquire and developp 5 acres for. neighborhood parks * Develop school/parE; site at Houston * Construct school/center * Construct district: pool 30 _ 'FUNDING POSSIBILITIES I FUNDING POSSIBILITIES Our first priority on funding these recommendations will be to look within the community for support through donations and leasing of property at little or no cost, as in the case of Briercliff Park where the property is used at no cost and businesses and neighbors have helped to fund the development. Our second priority will be to try to use funding sources available to the City such as the General Projects Fund, Capital Improvements Projects Fund, Community Development Funds, and the Recreation Fund to assist with funding these recommendations. These funds could help leverage Local Park Fund monies which are controlled by the State of Texas. These are 50/50 matching funds for the acquisition and development of parks in local communities. Our third priority would be to seek a tax increase or bond issue to fund the recommendations that were not funded by the above methods. A bond issue seems like the best recommendation because bond issues in 1965 and 1975 have funded recreation and park improvements to date. It is probably the best way for the public to express their desire or need for additional, facilities or programs. We would propose to investigate funding sources in 1984, and if we were not able to generate the funds needed, would propose a bond issue be attempted in 1985 to secure funding for these recommendations. The longer we wait to attompt this bond issue the further we fall behind in our attempt to keep up with an expanding and developing community. After a future bond issue is passed in the community, we would recommend the following plan of action. This plan takes into account that we will have the funds available to fund all the recommendations. If any of these are dropped out of the plan in the future, they can be removed from this action plan as well. This plan also assumes that there will be some flexibility and re-prioritization of recommendations as a bond Issue is put together. We also understand that it is possible that not all of the items currently on our list will appear in a bond issue. The following action plan, again, assumes that all recommendations would be included in a bond issue. Cost figures are based on 1984 cost estimates and include only acquisition and development costs. Year of Bond Issue Purchase land for community center $5009000 Purchase land at Mack Park 1005000 Meet with DISD to plan establishment of school/park sites and school/center sites Survey community on types of facilities to be included in community center i I 31 First Year After Bond Issue Hire architect to design community center, Senior Center addition, and school/center for NE Denton $140,400 Develop two school/park sites Prioritize funding of target park sites Apply for TPW grant funds for development of two softball fields at Mack Park, 250,000 begin development 20 000 Identify and landscape highly visible areas 2,500 Plant wildflowers along roadsides Second Year After Bond Issue Start construction projects: $2,540,000 Community Center 750,000 Senior Center Expansion 500,000 School/Center, NE 'Denton Develop two school/park sites 100,000 Acquire and develop park sites in four priority g25,000 areas, get TPW grant Apply for TPW grant to develop soccer complex 500,000 at North Lakes, begin development 100 000 Re-lamp and renovate fields at Denia 300 000 Re-develop and light fields at Evers 25,000 Begin study on linear parks 5,000 Begin bikeway master plan 24 000 Begin tree planting program in parks 201 000 Identi"), and landscape highly visible areas 20000 Expand irrigation system in parks 2,500 Plant wildflowers along roadsides Third Year After Bond Issue Develop two school/park sites $100,000 Acquire and develop park sites in four priority g25,000 areas, get TPW grant 330,000 Re-develop five existing park sites 250,000 Construct band shell in Civic Center Park 20,000 Continue tree planting program in parks Investigate expansion of gun range 20 000 Identify and landscape highly visible areas Expand irrigation system in parks 20,000 University Drive median improvement from 100,000 Carroll to 1-35 2,500 Plant wildflowers along roadsides 50,000 Expand garden area in Civic Center Park University Drive median improvement from 200,000 Bell to Loop 288 - 32 - Third Year After Bond Issue (contd) Expand senior program services Investigate senior satellite programs in targeted areas Develop year round swim program for handicapped Expand arts services for handicapped Fourth Year After Bond Issue Construct school/center in SE Denton $500,000 Expand tennis center 3501000 Construct two softball fields at Mack Park 350,000 Construct additional baseball/football practice fields at Evers 150,000 Build restroom/concession stands at Donia and Evers 10,000 Re-surface parking areas in Denis and Evers 300,000 Acquire and develop park sites in four TPW grant 825,000 priority areas et Re-develop five existing park sites 3300000 Start community tree planting program Construct district pool in North Denton 600,000 Continue tree planting program in packs 200000 Identify and landscape highly visible areas 20,000 Expand irrigation system in parks 200000 Plant wildflowers along roadsides 2,500 Sculpture garden in Civic Center Park 50,000 Fifth Year After Bond Issue Acquire and develop park sites in four priority areas, get TPW grant $825,000 Re-develop five existing park sites 330,000 Acquire new community park in NE and SE Denton 8003000 Conduct feasibility study on golf course Construct district pool in South Denton 600,000 Continue tree planting program in parks 20,000 Identify and landscape highly visible areas 20,000 Expand irrigation system in parks 20,000 Plant wildflowers along roadsides 2,500 33 SUMMARY SUMMARY Parks and recreation planning is a complox exercise which requires a delicate balance between the needs of the users, the availability of funding, the social and political climate, and the ability of responsible officials to interpret and to integrate those factors. If this master plan proves successful, it will be due in large part to the amount of public input and cooperation. 'The Department has striven to provide a plan that the citizens will continue to be involved with. A successful plan will add to an already high quality of life enjoyed by Denton citizens. The plan presentation began with a discussion of the benefits of municipal leisure service agencies, their worth, and their responsibilities. It was noted that modern park and recreation departments must provide facilities and programs that citizens cannot provide for themselves. Effectively managed parks, programs, and leadership can add to the illusive quality of life factor everyone is seeking. The City and County of Denton have prospered with steady, though sometimes spectacular, growth. Denton is growing at a manageable 2.69; annual rate. That allows for economic vitality and still permits stability. Two factors have kept Denton a young (median age 24.9 years) city; economic opportunities in this area and two state universities being located here. We have maintained steady racial proportions and are proving to be a popular city for senior citizens. Leisure services agencies must constantly monitor and evaluate trends. Those trends that affect parks and recreation departments range from demographic changes in the population to the wellness concept and general fitness trend. Department officials must also be aware of funding trends and changes in attitude toward revenues by taxpayers, One of the most significant trends is the move toward political entities becoming more of a service facilitator and less of a service provider. Standards, when properly adapted, are helpful in determining amounts and location of needed facilities, and open space. These standards help administrators by providing tangible objectives toward meeting citizen needs. The Denton Parks and Recreation Department has been involved in several survey projects locally. Using the results from those questionnaires and adding information from the Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan has made it possible to make some accurate assumptions about the needs of Denton's citizens. It is also imperative that the Department remain sensitive to issues raised by users and potential users of department services. 34 Recommendations previously listed in this plan are the result of a long, arduous effort by many pt.ople. Prioritizing facility recommendations is riot easy. It is, however, necessary. Planning keeps things moving toward established goals and forces consideration of present and future problems in an effort to mitigate those problems. In attempting to recommend resource allocation, the Department has divided the City into planning areas. Those six areas, divided by major streets and highways, can be considered as relatively homogeneous neighborhoods, Attempting to fill facility and open space needs in a small geographic area makes it possible to allow more for neighborhood interests and needs. Another way to consider facility recommendations is by communities of interests. These communities include athletic interests, cultural interests, and those interested in special populations, senior citizens, beautification, park development, and lifetime sports interests. These groups sometimes contend for the same resources but are very concerned also with the well being of the overall program. We wish to thank the various groups, organizations, and individuals who were involved in many hours of planning associated with these recommendations. The City of Denton named its first full time Parks and Recreation Director in 1964. Facility additions such as the Civic Center and pool in 1965, the three recreation centers in 1975, and parks acreage having grown to 570 acres are indications of progressive improvements. Facility deficiencies do, however, exist in all parts of the City. Those ha;e been addressed in this plan with the hope that those deficiencies can be addressed in a logical sequence. Hopefully, this -Ian will allow the Department to maximize present and futu. 'esourc.es without undue adverse effect on general revenue sources. The need for general fund tax support can be minimized by a greater reliance on more efficient operation techniques, greater reliance on fees and charges, and greater cooperation with other agencies, particularly DISD. The Department is also serious about exploring outside funding sources such as co-sponsorship of special events and/or programs with corporations and aggressively pursuing monies from grant sources. A long research and deliberation process has translated findings into needs, needs into a plan, and now it is important that that plan be translated into action. The plan should provide an outline to help with specific day to day decisions so that the whole program can maintain continuity and integrity. - 35 - AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL June 5, 1984 work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, Juno 5, 1984, at 500 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5:30 p.m. 1. Receive a report on retiree insurance. 2. Disci. ssion of Planning and Zoning Coramissi.on processing times. 3. Discussion on Flow Memorial Hospital and Library funding. 4. Executive Session: l A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. [teal Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-1.7 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under. Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V,A.T.S. S). Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 5, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of January 31, 1984. 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is reconm:ended by the Staff ar,l approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. City of Denton City Counc.-U Agenda June 5, 1984 Page Two A. Bids and Purchase Ordersi 1, Bid # 9254-1 - Modular furniture 2. sid # 9273 - Circuit breaker convexslon 3, Bid # 9285 - Utility marking system 4, Bid # 9286 - Pothole patch machine 5. Bid # 9287 - Brush chipper 6. Sid # 9288 - 60" cut mower 7. Bid # 9289 - Concrete saw 8, Bid # 9295 - Office furniture 9. Purchase Order # 63108 to Bailey Meter Company in the amount of $3,514.00. 10, Purchase Order # 63396 to Gaylord Brothers Inc. in the amount: of $4,980.00. 11. Purchase order # 63471 to Anacomp Micrographics in the amount of $5,000.00. B. Plats and Iteplats; 1. Aplrov al of the preliminary replat of lots 31 4 and 5, block A, of the Lincoln Park Addition. (Thc Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 2. Approval of the preliminary replat of lots 1 and 2 of the Adkisson Addition (Denton County Jail.) . (The Pl.anninq and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Commerce Center Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of Lots 1, 2 and 3, 15iock 1, ci the Jannie Street Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) I City of Denton City Council Agenda June 5, 1984 Page Three 5, Approval of the preliminary plat of Section I of the Windsor Park Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of the Parks and Recreation Department comprehensive master plan. (The Parks and Recreation Board recommends approval..) 4. Public Hearings: A. Public hearing on Eligible Blighted Area designations in the City of Denton for the sale of Industrial Revenue Bonds. B. Z-1658. 'Phis is the petition of Melvin Ha.isler requesting a change in zoning from agricultural. (A) to the general retail (GR) classification on an approximately 0.8 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of FM 2164 (North Locust) and proposed Loop 288. 1, Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoring from agricultural (A) to the general retail (GR) classification on an approximately 0.8 acre parcel. located at the northeast corner of FM 2164 (North Locust) and proposed Loop 288. C. Hold a public hearing cn the proposed annexation of approximately 81.44 acres of land beginning at Swisher/Shiloh Road, (A-1) D. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 522.76 acres of land beginning 3,7 feet south of and perpendicular to the center- line of U. 5, Highway 380. (A-3) E. Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexati,)n of approximately 9.013 acres of land beginning approximately 700 feet east of Sherman Drive. (A-4) 5. ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public; hearings on the proposed annexation of approximately 31.335 acres of land located on the east side of North Locust Street. (A-5) City of. Denton City Council Agenda June r', 1984 Page Four B. Consider adoption of an ordinance restricting the parking between ttre northern most driveway on the west side of I.O,O.F. to the end of the paverrient on I.O.O.F. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission, recommends approval.,) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the closing and vacating of that portion of Texas Street beginning 125' east of Rose Street and ending 1.70' west of Wood Street. D. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending street- light pro rata chargcra. (The Public Utility Hoard recommends approval.) 6. Resolutions: A. Consider approval of a resolution and accompanying final statement of community development objectives and projected use of funds, B. Consider approval of a resolution declaring curtain areas of the City of Denton as blighted for the purpose of allowing the sale of Industrial Revenue Bonds to imUrove these areas. 7. Consider approvat of a request from RWGP, Inc. for water and sewer service; outside the City limits at Page Road and Shiloh Cemetery (southeast of Denton). (Tile Public; Utility Board recommends approval,) 8. Receive a report on electric rate demand charges, 9. Consider authorizing the City Manager to negotiate with the Flow Hospital Administrator concerning funding of the hospital, 10. Presentation by the Mayor of a report on pollution. 11. Official Action on Executive Session Items. A. Legal ;!tatters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments City of Denton City Council Agenda. June 51 1984 Parye .141vo 12. Now Bus moss i This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of. Denton, Texas, on the day of 1984 at o'clock (a,m.y {p.m,) CITY SECRT-;TARY ,rmcnsO CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUrLNNG OENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE r817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM TO: Betty McKean Assistant City Manager FROM: Kathryn Usrey, Director Person nol/Employee Relations SUBJ: Retiree Insurance DATE, May 29, 1984 At an April City Council meeting I presented a report on retiree insurance. The Council asked me to research the option of making a contri 0tion toward health insurance for retirees We a fixed amount of money for a fixed period of time.) This report contains the results of my research. For the purposes of this report I have used the some assumptions as before--five new retirees each year with one retiree leaving the plan each year. I have calculated three contribution rates for a fixed period of 10 years. Because of the assumptions that were used, the total dollar cost for the City increases each year up to Year 11 at which point it drops and stabilizes. Based on the aforementioned assumptions: o A $10 contribution per retiree per month would cost $7,200 in Year 10 and would then drop to $4,800 for each year thereafter, in per month Per reiree would cost $18,000 at o YA $23 ear 10 and contribution thereafter, o A $50 contribution per month per retiree at Year 10 would cost $36,000 and would then level off to $24,000 for each year thereafter, Attached is a chart which snows the annual rate for the first 12 years of this program for each contribution amount. I ('elo/iietty McKean Retiree Insurance 6/29/84 Page 2 Since this contribution rrill be considered a post-employment benefit, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) proposal that we discussed with the Council in the April 4 meeting will remain an issue. You will recall that, the FASI3 proposal will mean that the cost for any post-employment benefit must be accrued over the active service life of the employees. The impact of this proposal would mean that we would have to show on our balance sheet the yearly accrual of post benefit amounts for each employee in addition to the actual cost for the retirees, The impact of the FASQ proposal ~s i~rore significant than the actual contribution, With this additional information, my recommendations refrain the same; that the City offer the HMO as an alternative both to our employees and to retirees; that the retiree fun(, the cost of his/her insurance. Please let me know if further information is needed. Trig thryn Usrey, )recto Personnel/Employee Relations Ku/rew 1860P 7 7 it i CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATEt May 25, 1984 TOt G. Chris 11artung, City Manager FROMi Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development SUBJECTt COUNCILMAN HOPKINS INQUIRY REGARDING PROCESSING `rims The Planning and ''Zoning Commission has established an unoffi- cial pollcy of hearing a maximum of five (5) zoning petitions per meeting. As of today (May 25, 1984) the June 13, 1984, Planning and Zoning Ccm:lossion meeting has five public hearings scheduled and the June 1.984, meeting is partially booked, If a zoning petition w, fileu today, it would be scheduled for the June 27, 1984, Plat. '..)q and ~,oning Commission meeting. Planning and Zoning Commission public hearings on zoning peti- tions take considerably longe'i than the City Council hearings due to the degree of detail involved in the Planning and Zoning review, and because of tl,ie time consumed in meeting the spirit of due process requirements. The Development Review staff can only process about five zoning petitions per meeting and maintain the same level of quality. Many of the zoning cases being processed at this time are com- plex because multiplo land uses are proposed on large tracts of land. The Development Review staff also spends a great deal of time negotiating with developers with the goal of implementing the land use plan insofar as possible. This negotiation pro- cess can take up to four or five months, 'Plats are processed in accordance with the timing requirements specified in the subdivision regulations: "Submission of plat and necessary plan ten working days prior to the regularly scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting". J e f 120 U566a i . I M E M O R A N D U M T0; CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CHRIS HARTUNG, CITY MANAGER SUBJ; COUNTY FUNDING FOR LIBRARIES IN DENTON COUNTY DATE; May 16, 1984 Judge Cole requested that Joella Orr, Library Director at the Denton Public Library, host a meeting for himself and the librarians/representatives of each of the libraries in Denton County at the Denton Public Library. This initial meeting was held on March 30, 1984, At that meeting, Judge Cole asked the group to meet again and to decide what funding level they thought would be fair and would provide the best possible service for Denton County. This group agreed on the following points,. N All representatives feel that financial support for libraries is inadequate for- one of the fastest growing counties in the nation. M All libraries serve patrons outside their own town/city. All feel that the residents of the County should have equal access to the major, libraries of the County. * County funding for library service is essential for equal access. * County funding should only be provided when there is financial support from each town or city, Library representatives a--reed to contact their County Commissioners should they have any further, suggestions, The attached letter is the report Joella sent to Judge Cole. Pi 0304H , lJcnto~t publlc Zibrarb - 602 OAKLAND OENTON. TEXAS V201 May 11, 1984 JOELLA ORR, OIREOTOR Judge Buddy Cole Carroll Courts Building Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Judge Cole: I understand your concern about the County's oredibility with the public in tending one l.ibrrary for every 19,000 people in Denton County. The proliferation of small libraries in the County could dilute the effectiveness of the dollars spent. I regret that the discussions with the representatives of the libraries in 'Denton County revolved around dollars instead of service. It is necessary that all the citi- zens of the County have available to them adequate library servioe. Availability of library service should not depend on the taxpayer residing inside the limits of a municipality that funds this service. Those citizens who live outside corporate city limits also need and use libraries. The idea of free public libraries is a misnomer. Because public libraries are supported with tax dollars they are not free. What they are, instead, is a prepaid City or County service. Our citizens believe and expect library service to be something they receive for their tax dollar. County support for library service should be continued and a long range plan should be established. Presently the Denton Library is the only library with the space, staff, and diverse collection that can serve County r sidents. For instance, it is not unusual for a full busload of students from one of the County schools to come here for several hnurs. Most of the representatives of the other libraries also use the Denton County Library in order to adequately serve their patrons and for their own personal. use. Letter to Judge Cole Page -2- service I:o the County as a whole is a necessity but provision for' that eervioe can- not be the sole financlal responsibility of those citizens who live within the Uenton City limits. The County is currently funding only 10% of the Denton Library operating budget, With a current out-of-City patron usage of 25%, the City of Denton cannot afford to subsidize 60'% of County patron usage with City tax revenues. Using the current COG estimate of January 1, 1984, Denton County is given a popula- tion of 192,200 and the City of Denton 52,200. The current 1983/81 Li'orary operating: budget figure is X1181,615. The City of Denton pays $8,31 for each person living in the the City ($433,5311)• The County pays 250' for each person living in the. County ($48,081), As you can see, the County does not pay its fair share. Because the bond indebtedness for the building is the complete responsibility of the City taxpayers, it is my personal opinion that the County fair, share would be 50% of the operating budget, However, 1 will recommend to our City management and the Library Board that the County be requested to fund 25% of th- operating budget for their fair share of patron usage. The preliminary 1984/85 operating budget for the current level of service of 49 hours per week amounts to $528,631• County funding for 25$ would be in the amount of 68d per person living in the County ($132,157). The City of Denton's funding would amount to $7.59 per person living in the City ($396,1174)• Funding to restore the level of service to 60 hours a week would require a prelimi- nary figure for 19811/85 of $592,275, County funding for 25% would be in the amount of 77d per, person living in the County ($148,068). The City of Denton's funding would be in the amount of $8.50 per person living in the City ($444,207). Sincerely, Joi la Orr Library Director JO/ci 0;'981i City Council NInutes January 31, 1994 The Council convened into the special Called meeting at 5100 p.m. '..o Flow Hospital to meet with the County Commissioners, Flow Hospital Board of Directors and the Hospital Administrator to discuss Flow Hospital. MEMBERS PRESENTI Mayor Stewart) Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespergerl Council Members Alford, Chew, Hopkins, and Stephens City Manager, Assistant City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS All SENT I Council Member Barton was handling a law case out of town The Council convened Into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. The following official action on Executive Session item was taken. Hopkins motion, Che%e second to appoint Mr, Stanley Monroe to the Flow Hospital Board of Directors. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Stewart stated that the Council had been concerned regarding; the loss report which had appeared in the newspaper. Judge Cole then stated that this was a discussion item only and that no action would be taken. 'nary Williams, Flow Hospital Board of Directors, stated that the Board was equally surprised at the audit report which had been received on January 19. Jeff Hausler, Flow Administrator, handed out copies of the audit report which had been prepared by the firm of Poat, Warwick anti Mitchell. Hausler reported that assets had declined from 3.5 nillicn to 3.1 million. Fixed assets had declined due to depreciation, accounts payable had declined but accrued expenses had increase::. Council Member Chew asked about the "doubtful accounts" categ,:r%, how did the hospital establish these as doubtful to bn eoller;•.ed. Hausler responded that the audit firm determined these accounts by trends from month to month. Council Member Chew asked what procedure was now being used to collect accounts. Hausler responded that 6 months before, there had been no sys-.em to collect accounts. There was no structure to follow-up on delinquent accounts. A step by step structure had been implerentad with a staff person to follow-up only on old accounts. Council Member Stephens asked at what point were accounts written off. Hausler responded that the collection process was completed and if still not paid, the accounts were written off in 3.20 days. Council Member Hopkins stated that the trend in collections sr.-11 prevailed. After the last meeting which had been held dith Ficw ;ioard members, the Council had felt the situation was improvtnc. Hopkins expressed shock at the newspaper article on the audit report. Hausler replied that the new collection system had been !.mplemented just before the previous meeting Ind the results were just new being seen. City council Minntes Meeting of January 31, 1984 Page Two Council Member Hopkins asked if patients were being screened prior to admission to the hospital, Hausler replied this could to done and had been initiated, M,.yoe Stewart asked if a report was being made to tha Flow Board of Directors on a monthly basis, 11ausler responder yes Mayor Stewart stated that a change had been made in the report, rho previous reports reflected when a payment to the hospital had been made and not Aen the patient had been dismissed, Don Rill, County Auditor asked how the hospital administration planned on paying back the deficit. Hausler responded the hospital had been working on a month to month basis durinc the last year, The $670,000 payback to Medicare/Medicaid was now due, Hill asked since this was a nationwide problem, would the Federal Government made provisions for the payback, Hausler replied not the money was due on March 9 and there would be heavy financial penalties for delayed payment, Mayor Pro Tem Riddlesperger stated that the County and City would have to look at a tax to support the hospital, Judge Cole responded that the County was looking for the City t^ cIo their part in the support of Flow, Wallace Batey, County Commissioner, stated that nov there were two political entities with joint responsibility for the hospital. Batev felt that the hospital should be under only one entity and that the County should take it over, Judge Cole stated that the City Council and the County Commiss:vners should get together and discuss how to help Flow Hospital, Bill Switzer, County Commissioner, stated he believed a non-binding referendum election should be held on the hospital district tax issue. A discussion followed on various options and opinions on the funding of the hospital in the future and the Medicare/Medicaid payr,.ent. with no official action to be taken and no further business, the meeting was adjourned. RICHARD 0,-59BiJART, ;:,iYOR CHARLOTTE ALLEN, ClT'l SECRI'rAR'i CITY COUNCIL AGI,NDA Bi \GK-UP SUMMARY Slll,L I' DATE, OF MrETING; June 5, 1984 COUNCLh AGENDA ITEM 11; Consent Agenda SUBJECT; Bid Y9254-1 MODULAR FURNITURE SUMMARY; 'This bid is for the modular and Other furniture for the old police wing of the Municipal Bui.Lding. We have sOM this bld LW(ce n0{,' a;: prepared by Mr. Jerry Wright of Desif;us for Today. 'rite las, hid was rujocLed because we roce,lved only one hid on the modular furniture. We received throe bids this time ranging from $45,204.36 to $60,964.63 on Group "A" Modular and $14,165.78 to $)1,346.59 on Group "B". The avaluated totals on group "B" range from $15,627.38 to $17,34b..59. ACTION f;QUIVED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid S;OUP(:% OF i't'SDS: Special Remodeling Capital Improvement 1'+.nK IZGC~)?L'II,icDA'IION; I'ho IocIII ICU l oval uatIoa a; presented by Mr. Jerry Wright and attached, racomw-nds that this bid K, aWardod to Envlron for section "k" at $58,255.00, and section "B" at $0,3414.59 for the Grand Total or $75,601.59. We, however, have eval.ua Led scctiou. "B" of the hid and recommend section "B" be av. ,ded to Friday's office supply for the all but four items they hid at $14,165.18 and the balance be purchasud on an op:~n quotaLiott by Purchasing for around 11,100.00, with a saVIuf;!I of approsimaLely $1,500.00. EXHIhITS: 'r.cb"Lat ion Sheet and Technical Evaluation and RuclomwundaLion by Mr. Jerry Wright .f('hn .l. Mnrshnl.l, C.Y.M. Purchasing Agent L' i I 1311) 0 ^F_~9254-1 BXh `ODULAR/MISC, OITICE FIJItNL'CUjq Ir11'iJOR'fli is\VIICON! 11WS .1 NH,8S FRIOM'S OPEN Mav 222 1964 2 m ALIAS INC. IN'f'I:R'[OR 01'IIGI: DALLAS ARLINGTON SUPPLY ACCOUNT PENTON V K, 90 ~R vp, - L)N ) LNI)0l2 ' V1.~lf)UI2 V!?.NUUIt 'i_IdU'U(t _ A Piodtrlar O1'f ce Fut'rillure 601964.63 581255.00 45 20/s.36 X11° ?Ilsaellaneous Office Furnituro _ NB 17,346.59 15,91)0, i6 14,165.18 I'VilitlAtad Totatl/?I.lOffice I~urn, NB 17,346.59 16,270. 16 15 6 2 7 2 8 - o I (V e r v tit Ua v 90 5 5 - - - - - J0-100 75 BID - #9254-1 TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF BIDS ON MODULAR FURNITURE BUSINESS INTERIORS, 908 - 113th ST„ ARLINGTON, TX. Contract "A", Modular Furniture 1. General A. Panels do not meet accoustical requirements (see Specifications 2.2 C - N,R,C, rating ,80) Panels bid are of fabric over steel construction with an N.R,C, rating of .35. B, Panels do not have connectors which provide full height barrier to eliminate light and sight, They are not capable of interconnecting panels of different heights, or allowing for future rearrange.- ment without purchase of additional hardware (see Specifications 2.2 E) C. Panels are a mix of standard and power, 1, Standard panels bid did not include panel kick plates (spkp series) 2. Standard panels can never be retrofitted with power in the event configuration should change (sae Specifications 2.3 C). D. Finish posts arcs not provided. Bidder indicates "not required". (SCSI Specifications 2.9) r;. T-Mount Connectors are not provided (see Specification 2.5) F, worksurfaces bid arc not cantilevered and are not to specification (see Specification 2.GA) G. '.Vask lights arc not prov.idod in t.hrou widths (see 13pecification 2.6 0) 11, Rectangular tables bid do not hive end panels and full modesty panel (sec Specification 2.7) 11 . 5pc:Ci fic Item Called for in Specifications Deviation in Bid A-2 quantity 7 Extension wrong A-11 121lx66" panel, fabric 181lx65" panel, fabric A-18 361lx66" panel, glass 48"x65" panel, glass A-23 121'x80" panel., fabric 24"xg0" panel, fabric A-26 36"x80" panel, glass 4811x80" panel, glass A-38 simplex out.lut~; deleted A-41 T-Mount, kit, 48" deleted A-42 it to deleted A-46 quantity 12 bid 11 3 of those bid cannot A-46 worksurfacc. 60 x 24 be mounted at 36" height A-59/ Drawer, 611, w/lock locks not provided A-60 Drawer, 12", w/lock A-63 Walltrack 66" Wal.ltrack, 80" A-07 72"x3(1" task table noes not provide end or modesty panels ITT, Summary Even though other series of Steelc,ase or other items in this series were available, this bidder has taken liberties with the specifications to enter a low bid without regard to function of the sysLems, the ability to physically fit th(- system into the space, or whother the items bid can be mechanically assembled to closely match the drawings. in my opinion, using the items bid, the bidder cannot complete the project, if the bidder thinks this is too harsh an opinion, 1 wuttld welcome the oppoi'i:unity to review a plan drawing he prepares. contract Misc,_vurniture I, Goneral it is unclear whoth©r the LION R series chairs bid prov'.de the upgraded fabric, dual carpet castors and 5 prong bases. Also, the K-56 chairs bid were not designed to stack and factory does not recommend forced stacking. II, Summary The bid is incomplete and there is no information on the Hercules T1,368 treble provided. It woul(I seem necessary to determine whether the special HON items are to be provided, FRIDAY'S OFFICE SUPPLY, 519 N, ELM, DEN`I'ON, T.S. Contract "R"Misc, rurniture 1. General It is unclear whothol. the HON R series chairs provide the 5 1)~oncj base. II. Summary The b.id is iracoA1pIUN te. HAt-,ORTH, INC., 072 WORLD TRADE; CENTER, DALLAS, TX. Contract "A", Modular furniture uuma ry The bid is complete. and meets all of the intent of the spk~rification. 1:NVIRON, TNC., .1333 OAF, LA4JN, DALLP~S, T\, C'ontCaC_tLL "A", t_laciulrrr rui.niture CwHitrat Misc. furnlLuvo Summary 130th bids are complete and meet al l cif the inLc nt of tlzc specifications, Page A RECOMMENDATION Since this bid was designed to be awarded as o.i ther/or both Contracts "A" and "B", I fool the awards should proceed on that basis, Potentially, there could be some savings from taking item prices bid under the "B" contract but since the only complete "B" contract bid calls for aggregate award, some Items would have to be re-bid. This project has already been bid twice, at some direct expense to the City and some indirect costs based oil tImo-of -delivery, Also, there is some value and savings to the City to only have to superviso and coordinato with as few vendors as possible on a project li.ko this. The low bidder on Contract "A" should not be awarded the contract because of the many failures to meet the specifications and ommissions as cited above, ,rho third bidder on Contract "A" in combination with the low, incomplete, all-or^none t..idder on Contract "B" would save the City only a few dollars and force re-bid of several items, providing the questions on his bid word satisfactorily resolved. ror these reasons, it would seem to bo in Lhc, best.. interests of the City to award b )Lh contracts Lo Environ, Inc, s.inco they seem to have provided the "lowest and bosL" bid and the o:oO-' call proceed. ~TC;tYI'y 1~11"1g11t ~ Lie sik7ns for 'today May 25, 1904 I i I I CITY WOUNCIL AGENDA RACK--LIP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF til{EFING; June 5, 1984 COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM !r'; SUBJECT: Bid 89273 CIRCUIT BREAKER CONVERSION SUMIIIAltY; This bid Is for the conve.rston of the 15KV switch- gear from air current break to vacuum circuit breafier. The orlginaf 15KV swtteligear was installed In 1954 and the newe.SL In the 19604. We have experlonerd several failures and the maxinnlm Interrupting racing is exceeded undr.r Sop1e opora:iono, Fn Iure to COllve.rt t.ho breakers way cau9e a faiit;ro wIt Ii it resuIU1IIt Long-ttwo Ioss of CnFiLotaer sere ice. I Tho Co IIvers.1on wit L Incrtease the Intorrupt.Ing Capabi l i.ty 501 and de.cronso the operating time appruxinutLoLy 60%. ACYLOS K QUTAED; Approval by Council and Award of Bid 51At ia.E' O HIN'llS; 1983.86 Budget funds i 610--008-0251-8339 4 Unity 3$,(100.00 Gll (108-0".i.l-9d17 b hnit:: 57,000,00 61 1-008-0253-9217 2 1nterrupLers 7.~1(IC).(lU 97,100,00 104-85 Budget i"uti(k 611-OUR-0153-9217 10 Units 95000_00 TOTAL $192,100.0() 9EC0,'*tENhATI0N'; l,'c recomnlOn d thi S bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of PrienLer Supply (ESCO) in the amount of $9,500.00 per unit for 20 units and $1,050.01", pet' spare vacuum bot t icy.. Total bld pvlce $192,100.00, I I:, q!Hlls; Talullal lon Sheet PUB MlnutPs, :5/7.3/81 Pail 'I Paragraph 7 I Tom 1). Ass;istont Purvhawky, Ahvnt IIL~ C.:cc«%`:~ c,c(' ._C ..:eC l~..L..•'1...,:5. _ ..Lam.. 1. L'. 1 l•.. IB C; C•.. C_':l l+ C' \'L. i , 55..C3'1 il,r.E.1G h:L.., _ ..'L,.:'c•+. CLA _1.;14" ♦ :\i; Li 1'i::tl;:. C'. i. ..:•i~ i::CU :~i . 1 U . r ♦ ~ J 1. _ _ _ - li'.. C)[1 if3SU_.5 "e: _~1:::. t::iCc C•••~~:. i'i i.:v C'i ivti. ..f'.~`. Jil :..r.. 1: _ 1'10ldOVe •crv belle\IeC Co E, 1:~...-C. C- o oc A. .1 JZ? CCitC..lli: t::G J\I lt'.✓U: T.: ...:~v iliul Carr I\,. _ G i:...: r: Y is t.~ i Y l'...^. ii: i :1: 5 i'I f: Y 1) J ill., ii • • . 1... _ :'Ic-C l'' c c i.. :.:C u i'n 1. C " 1111) N CIrCUI l ii rt -;i k l'I' C 11 l l v v l' s 11111 -Apri l_ :.'•'1 P)W 2 1).w. 1;4501) W-'NhRA]. - XI.ECTKLC ACCOUNT it 611-170ti-0253-9 17-1:362 - 1,rrX . LTi,~t ut,sc [tz t> t toi~ UOit vt.,rauolt v[ o[~ T>~~ii ` Vi ~,i)oit VF5ff) R " .-~auo1F- C011VL'I'Siiult S S1Iare V ICWIal b0L Le ( Inter rulttcr5) 1 ,0~O, U0 Oct. l 150 D"Ivs I~ P ry TJ w~ I CI'T'Y COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUDI, WkY Si1Rii'I' DATE: OF MEETINCt T"no 5, 1981, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Pi BUBAECI': Bid 09285 UTILITY MARKING S1'STI?I SC`L'L%RY: This bid Js for the purchase 0f a pipeline Marking System constsLing of a post, decals and post driver, Tho posts are of a flexible type designed to withstand pushing; over, j,unshots and other types of vandal Ism. The tiysLem Wi.11 he tlsed to mark the raw water linEa from the lake to the plant. In fill attempt to keep colitractors and construction crows from damag ine t h i.s line, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council and Award of Bid S!)i;;,Ct. OF FUNDS 1982-83 BudgeL Fund: Account Number 620-003-00 ,,3IM-c Water PJanL Fixed Assets, Plaint and Equipment OG RL'COMME.NDATto\: We recomnlend this hid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Roadrunner Supply in the nmou"t of $5,254,00 for 500 post, 1,000 decals and I poss driver. Del ivory in 14 - 21 days Foh DoDwrl. EXIi18IT Tabulation Sheel 5UY?EI'I°l'i:b BY: 1 - Tom 17, Shaw, C,P,AI, Assistant PurchosInl; Agent l p J_ 9285 N May 22, 1984 2'1),IWO ROADRUNNi'R CARSONI'1E _I INVUSTRI S TRA FIC INTERNNI,10'Al, MOUNT E [ i G~s~ z v t 0 vi ii~~ r ~uoti -WNI)OR i,.: ()011 V )o v ; ll, i ULMLy Macklog 8ti,skem 51279.00 5,154,00 x'19,00 Delivery 30 Days 14-21 Days 30 Days - . CITY COUNCIL, ACI,,NUA HACK-Ur SUNIMRY snrl:r DATI: OF MEETINC: June 5, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM ll; Consent Agenda SUBJECT: AID# 9286 POTHOLE PATCH MACHINE SUMMARY 'T'hin b.Id as for the [mcch se of a Fotholo Patching Machine for use by the Strout Department. In the Ilia Intuuance of City streets, The unit w.ll.l he mounted on a truck cab and chassis already oil order. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid. SOURCE OF HNDS; 1983-84 Budget funds AceounL A 100-002-0031-9106 Street: Department Capital Expenditures Machinery and Equtpment. RucomIE?U.vrION: Wo recowiend this bi.d be :warded to the lowwIt bidder of RCS hiduatries in Lho amount or $20,347,57 with t1olivery in 60 days nfter rucethr of truck, F,\IIIRL'CS: Tabu!at ion Shoet. SLII1MIT ED BY: Assi::Lant Purchasing Agent I il'l'O POTHOLE P,1'I'C11 MACHINE OPEN ?lav 198;1 p,in, RCS THEiRMO l\!)Uti'1'RfES t\5I'Ho1I:f' i nCS'Ul1N'i' R lsl~U I I'MEN.l' CO, , INC. ---__-~_...iT~i,~i- a~si,'fi;t~~~~a ~i •V a )aii...... Vt~,~Uo{i _ _t~iai~uo~- -V~;rTr)~iz._ -V it`~. -UI. iG~is__ i i- Pothole Ilatchcar 20,347.5422,081_00 _Delivery 00 Mm, 60 Davs _ CITY COUNICII, AGENDA BACK-UP SUMOtr1RY Slll{E;'r DATE OF MEETINGt Juno 5, 1984 CITY COINC1I, AGENDA ITEMfi; Consent Agenda SUBJECT: BID# 9287 BRUSH CHIPPER SLRIARY; This bid is for the purchase of a brush chipper for the Parks & Recreation Department. The unit is an addition to the motor pool fleet. It Will be used in the park maintenance program. Currently, brush etc, to being; hauled to Farmers Branch Landfill for disposal., This chipper will allow us to reduce the brush M. to MOW nnct us,, It in and around the various City facIllties. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council. and Award of Bid SOURCE OF PUNDS; 1983-84 Budget Funds Account # 100-•003-0064-9106, Park Department Capital. Expendutire+, Machinery mid l:quip➢en t, he rero;nmencl this bid be awarded Co the lowest bld meL,Lhi; sporificatfon of Watson Distrlbuting, In the amount of $3,836,00. Delivery in 30 days. I The less, expensi.vc: unit quotctd by Colon.inl. Motors does not meet speclficat.i.on. It is a smaller machine with a 3" capacity instead of the 6" capacity required, EXHIMS: Tabulation sheet. SGIiMITIF.D BY: ( Tom D. Shaw, CI'PI An Isl.cnt iurchastnf, Al,,ent BID Nrush Chippur WATSON GOI.ONFAI. ( OLOWA I'114'S GOLOWAI TES 0PGN »-rtM tl, ~~8 t Y~ T DJS'I', CO, D!0'1'01t CO, ACCOUNT N gi c colt 1_ l i't'e.c+ feud Brush Chippcv 31836,00 2,380.00 30895,00 4,500,00 Vandermulcn Ruvar Rove t' Model 12 'i27Y3 2600 2600 Uel five r>' 30 Days 30 Days 15-30 pays 30 !lays CiTY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHET DATE O MEETiNGt June 5, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT I Ilid 09288 60" CVV MOWER SUMMARY: This bid IS for Lhe purchase of a 60" cut riding type mower for the Municipal Power plant- The, uniL is at moLor pool replacement for Unit 05163. The new mower will be usod in the grounds malnLenance program and the old mower will be sold SL auction. AC11ON kEt1UIREU; Approval by Council and Award of 1101 S01'9Ct: OF FUNDS: Motor pool. Replacement. Account. 11720-004-0020-87G' R1,(;t)~I'11'\DATI0N: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest and hest bid moot-iny, specifications of WaLson Distributing in the amount of $5,292,00 for a SMILhco Model 20169, The lower price of $4,791.;1 offered by WaLsou for a Howard mower falLs Lo meet cbo SpecificatLuuS in Lire size, ;spindle size, steering mounting, and Lransmission. 1:YHi13Li: TQ"UIaL10q Sheet. ~ 1 SrB11TrED BY: Tom D, Shaw, C,P,M, Assistant Purchaoing Aim I w1w 60r, ,ue Mows 0PI N Mils' 2'2 1984 2 WATSON WATSON C01-DWATTVS WATSON COLONIAL. ("OLDIM11'1'.S DIST DIST, OF TEXAS DI 8'r, MOTORIq ACCOUNT 11 w Y II. III ~,,RM MCA t IOR VEN5o t T ,N-D )F- -VMLTU(5i1 UU€-t ~ X00--R r TGaFF 1 Nowev 6,070.00 5,292.00 5,574,00 4,791,00 5,862.00 9,100,00 Maki' C11:311114F1r1 Sall thr,) Tor) Howard Ilicobsolt 7'O 1,o . - --`-Model 893804 20169 Crciunds - 601811 Turf KA 2 Grounds- Ma s l c t• ?I tr as t c r Do Iivo.ry 30 Dav 30 Days 7-14 Days 10 IJnyr 30 O"Ivs CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SACK-UP SU?11MAR'i SHEE'r DATE OF MEETING: .Juno 5, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM A: SUBJECT: Bid 09289 CONCRETE 5A14 SU01ARY: This bid is for the purchase of a replacement concrete saw for the Water S Sewer Department. The unit is used to cut concrete and asphalt around pipeline repairs making street repair much easier and neater. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of SLd SOURCE. OF FUNDS; Motor Pool Replacement Account Number 720-004-0020-8707 ($1,443,00) and 1983-84 SudgeL Account Number 620-008-0471-9104-($2,452,00) RECd~L~ita.NDA'l'I.UN: Wo recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification of Bacra e Supply In the amount of $3,895,00 Fob Denton, with delivery in 5 clays. The unit bid by North Texans Industrial fails to meet specifications in the engine size requirements. EXHIBIT: Ta elation ~heeL SUI;yI KED BY: Tom I), Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent CONCRE'r13 SAID' 13ACRAC MOODY w writSUPPLY UAY TA;XAS, N SUPI'I.Y kCCOUNT O (:uncre t o Saw "3s849.00 4 1015. 00 ` 31685,00 _ _ Turl;e I'nrl;ot 11'13CC Model Ex- 185 1sC-185 _ Uclfvery -5 ?htys 7-I0 imys - ._.__11,6 Woo s~ - _ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATEi June 5, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMAi Consent Agenda SUBJECTi This bid is for the purchase of furniture for special offices for Community Development at 235 West Hickory. We sent this bid to the three local office furniture dealers in Denton and received 2 bids, This furniture is the lines that havy been selected as standard office furni- ture for the City of Denton, ACTION REQUIREDi Approval by Council SOURCE OF DUNDS; 100-005-CD03-9102 Grant RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded as follows, To Denton Office Supply items 6 at $120.00 each because of delivery, Item 8 low bid and delivery at $330.00. The balance to Business Essentials (formerly Friday"a) as shown on the tabulation sheet, Total of bid award $4,239.35. LXHIBIT; Tabulation sheet SUBMITTED BY: Join J. Marsha 1, CPM Purchasing Agent I)ENTON BUSINESS OPEN Ma _ 3l 19~~ 2 i , q OFFICE ESSENTIALS n- •____..-.•-Y i - - _1 I SUPPLY ACCOUNT 1-LPtr 28.x. ~1 PSI.-.__ - VENDOR VEAD7It --V-VN~~ BUR 2 l_-- C'618SD lion Executive Chalr--__ 250.00 233,45 X 3 l CA29 Brown Han hxmitivu Cha1r 325,00 298, 01l 4 1 CA66 Blrtck 11011 Secretary C1141l' 130,00 120,00 5 1 C7,66 Brown Hon Secretary Chair 150,00 144.00 6 6 - CA45_BSRSW Nan -Arm Chair 120,00 104.00 7 -2 DD-PL613 Ind lana Doak 601100" 440`00 ` 3b9. 00 8 1 DD-111,640 '1' Indiana Doak 50"x26" 330,00 yy 359,00 - 9 1 DD-111,613-72 lndlnnu Desk 721106" 495.00 - 485100 x i0 1 DD-•P1,617-60 I, Secretary Desk 60/30 375,00 _ 345,00 x - ` 11 1 DD-P1.601R Sec, Roturn 235,00 215.00 Total 49390.00 4,072.35 7a 2 IIN15211 OK Ilon Desk 66"x30" 435,00 438,91 Sa 1 NN-15271 UK lion Desk 66"x30" 435.00 438,91 9a 1 IIN152910K Non Executive Desk 497,70 505,00 l0a 1 [IN-15262L OK 11011 Secretary Desk 382,75 388.00 lla l IIN-152138-OK Desk Return 226,00 229,40 Total 2,411.45 21439.13 CT'I'1' COl1NC11. ACENk I)A BACK-UP su MARY Slil_l.I 1984 ,NIEF'LLNG DATE; June 51 CT7Y COUNCX1, AGENDA I'1'EM01 Consent Agondn SUB.IEICT, Purchase Order 1163108 6niley Atotor Company Sl'"DL1R1'; THS purchase order in tl;e amount of $3,514.00 is for replncemettL prints for the Bailey Meter Control. Sy:;tem ,it the Power 1'.lant, Bnilcy Moter Company is Lhe or LgLila I manufaCturer of this nutCarial and It is not nvnilable froth any other source. ACTION RE.QU1.Rls0; Approval by Council. SOURCE OF FUNDS; 1983-84 Budget Fund Account P 610-008-0251-8339 Ma:irntenance of Genorating l:q;;tptnent, We recommend punccase order #0108 to Balley Meter Company in the cnnOUnt of $3,514.00 be approved, I:XIII1iIT St Purr..hnrr.- Order 1'63108 Miley Order P 1215111 SUB iIIVED BY; Tom U. Sl~ena, C. 1) .1iI. Assistant i'urcbnsinl; AganC: WT Vr VWi '1=^m (U 0 / C -i G 218 E, WKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER -R- - DENTON, TX 702*1 P, 0, NUMBER DATMENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPE VENDOR; SHIP T0; V , 1 r , i 1 I.. 1 r ~ . ~ iSia+~~y~.G -;1.5 BID NO. UNE AMOUNI TION ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIP t The City of Denton, Texas is tax oxempt • House BIII No. 20. n.R. NurnbO Items Recelved Date Voucher Nurnbor Amount RMC h''Ii ;1! I~'I,II Y „t. M, ~i Bailey Controls Company 6 A McDermott cumpany 20801 Euclid AvenUFi 1NIckkffo, Ohio 4402 7 t 1 i I i {218} 686.6800 Te1o:< 1:1; 21 •I-,Y 1 ~1 I `,"1 ~l.i 1 f'+IS 1,51 Al.h Li:J'ii.ti'1. } f I)V~:It-.'I i • i 1 i„ f, h, I .I 1 I ! : ~l I I I I' L. ill 'i 1... 51. ,'i i' ..r~ o -L.ii, t 1' I1• 1 . .i_rr •F } PI 1' 1 IiI e1. 1. I`a'<i:, is~.il. t.l, :~r','.vlC.r A: r: t ~1 kl. t, •.Y 1} 1~ I 11'n I.ll.! 5' .<I;Ai InF' 1_.'11 I it. i l ~I 111'~tk-~.I A.,i: r J+i ,i...t 11 iltl . l '1 l s- i i 1. 1 1 ' i , I r ' hl] "i I > i . , 1' I I' C L. 7 I Q • 1:. ) ! I • .i '.1,11 ,~'J.•:f .•i 1' 1 i'./I'1 tt ~1 • Ill ,JI-~ j .l`'~~I.1 1r 1, I , v I I'; ~i l . l 1: 1 l ' f • -r i l ~t'•.i~i''~?i~.i ~'u'I r a CITY COUNCIL MIENDA BACK-UP SMMARY MEET MEETING DATEi June 5, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM01 Consent Agenda SUBJECT; Purchase Order # 63396 GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC. SU,DLNRY This purchase order is for the purchase of moveable. compact shelving for the Library iti the Municipal Collection section. 'fliis shelving is designed to make the maximum use of small areas, and still snake all. shol.ves immediately available to use. We have purchased most of our library shelving and furniture from Gaylord Brothers and this would match our existing furniture. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Slid. SOURCE OP FUNDS; Budget # tO0-003-0730-9102 tU:L'ON;IENDATION: We recommend this Yurchasa Order be approved for the purcha';e of this shelving ,tit $4,980.00 for the. Municipal Ltbrary. FWIIBUFS: Purchase Order 63:496 Memo from Joella Orr SUB'X1'i"1'1x1 B1': A~v ~U fohrl s,~~ a . hzi 1 t , CF'Pt t'urcI cs] ng Agent. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 215 E. M4KINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 78201 P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYP 01i/A,I/A'z C03 S GAY49000 VENDOR: SHIP TO: ~r1Y1'1rZCi ;':<Cii• Ir1C• D3':N'0.1l PU)LIC 1. LMARY P li ;1CiY n''. r)1 CONI'I"MATION ONLY >Y2ACU:,-► `Y 112?1 0!.1 1401 MY-)LICATH ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION Y BID NO. LINE AMOUN nt 1), 00", 0;13 0102 1 MFI=44i1 Cil) FI_. FX SNGL CAR 400*00 I)2 1 `77 00'3 077) 9101, 2. ?-IF-' 1(7f1 M )1) FL MV 0 )L CA', 2 ►360► 00 O.i 1 J) )U;) :I? 1J 710:,t 2 AI_', 1,iV4-11 t;1T 11414 r):` SHP :;PIGL :210.00 )4 17:1 0i. ;'10;! 4 At_ )a a>3'1 ll:!A7 8101 INJ ';H* 1-11_ 1.401*0'J 1,,i !IL Fill! :'►(1• 4 • •l i!7• )0 The City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt - House Bill No. 20. - Reference P.O Number on otl BIL, Shipments and Involves. ! Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. Send Invoices TO: Direct All Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E. McKInney SL, Denton, TX 76201 Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent Phono 8171566.8223 8171566-H311 DIPW Metro 267.004?. The City of Denton is an equal opportunity employer i l~enfvn public ,C~brarb 602 OAKLAN D DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM JOELLA OAR, DIRECTOR T0: BETTY MCKEAN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER FROM: JOELLA ORR, LIBRARY DIRECTOR SUBJ: PURCHASE OF MOVEABLE SHELVINO FOR MUNICIPAL COLLECTION DATE: May 2:1, 4-934 Th(( puroh-arse order to Gaylord Brothers, Inc, has been submitted for approval fo:" thO purohaso of a modular eompaot moveable shelving systom for the Municipal Colleotion in the Library, This shelving is specially designed for use in libraries to make maximum use of small storage areas, The modulety components are self-contained and easy to install or move. The systom consits Of a modular stoel floor frame with built in lovelers, earpoLed floor sections, tracks., two end ramps, and a set of system side ramp and carriage stop. The carriages oonsist of a welded structural frame with wheel assembly, one end panel, and a mechanloal operator assembly with a 3 prong handle. The carriages are thus designed to move effortlessly, even when fully loaded. It is our plan to try this shelving system in the Municipal Collection room whr,re there is a very limited area for- storage, but a large storage napacit demand. If it proves as suocessfui. as I think it will be, we hope to use it in other areas of the Library where. shelving space is becoming a premium as bu'i.;et permits. !z3'~ Orr, Library Director r,L ; 03) "1 ti ~11r1; r~.:.r r c lohn 1arsh,rII, Puroh:rstng At;cnt iii .i•) ~ r CI'T'Y COUNCIL. AGENDA RACK-UP SUl<T WY SHEET DATE OF MEETING; June 5, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM !t; SURJECT: Purchase order #63471 ANACOMP MICROGRAPHICS SUFIMARY: This purchase is for the continuation of microfiche service for the Customer Service Division of the Finance. Department, Wo issued a purchase order earlier ghat cons approved, and this purchase order is for the balance of this fiscal fear with ail estimated amount of $3,000.00, AC'riON REQUIRED; Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS; Budget. 100-004-0022-8502 RRXIMME'NDAT[ON: We vocommend this purchase order lie approved for the continued microfiche service for Lhe balance of this fiscal year aL an estlmtiLcd amount of $5,000,00. E.X11 ifi1"T'; Purchase Order Copy SIIISyII'E'I'IiD fIy' ; J~1I111 orshul 1, C.1'.'M. Purchnstng Agcnt CITY OF DENTON, TSXAS 218 E, MoKINNEY ST, PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 7620 P. 0, NUMBER DATEIVENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPE VENDOR: SHIP TO: ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER ' UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UtNE AMOUNT Tho City of Donlon, Texas Is tax exempt • House Ejlil No. 20. R.R Number llems fieceWed Oalo Voucher Number Amount Ut'fY CUUNUIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING UATIE: June 5, 19b4 SUtiJr:Cf: approval of the preliminary replat of Lots J, 4, and 5, i3locK A, Uf the Lincoln Park Addition SUHMARY. Mis ..Sb acre tract is located at the nortawest corner of Lincoln Place and Uiiambers St. rhe property is zoned single family (SF-7) and single family development is anticipated, lie intent of the replat is to create two 75 lots Where three .5U' lots now exist. Water, sewor, gas, electric, telephone, streets, and drainage faciiities are in place. ACTIUN KLlQOIREU: Approve preliminary replat KECUMMENUAriUN: rite Planning; and coning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary replat. ALfEANATIVE: Approve the preliminary replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat eii5 ise -Spivey V Development Review Planner U5 /.gig e u A ti LOT 3; ~r o U r1N 1 `T ci 't U1 ~1i7 . 0 ` ~ Y W .J 1 c. 0 O \ ~ I L1 G I _ o ' K s 1-ARK ADG~TiON w N I 0 4 r L 0 5 f, ) n ! t aC r_ r vi i co n~ 1 , I u A;1 00 13 ROW 68 5G i I Ull'Y UUULgCIL A(iENVA BACK-UP SUMMARY Slil;KT MEKI'1NG DATE: June 5, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary repiat of Lots 1 and Z of the AdKisson Addition (Uentn Uotlnty Jail) SUMMARY: Tnis 21.9 acre tract is located on the west side of Woodrow Lane approximately :SUU' soutli of E. McKinney St. 'Ne. tract also has bU' of frontage on r:, 0cr.irsney St. fhe property is zoned enecal retail (VK) and multi-family kM -1) and wi l be the site of the new county ,Tail. Water and sewer service is available to the prop- erty. Gas and electric service will be avail- able in ttie tuture. A bU' right-of-way for the extension of Hickory St. currently runs tarouga the center of the property: this right-of-way for Hickory St. is to be abandoned with this plat. AG; IUN tEgU1KP.U: Approval of preliminary replat RECOMM&NDATION: 1'ne Planning and Zoning Uommission recommends approval o1 tue preliminary replat with the condition tnat the developers work with statt to resolve the access driveway problems. ALTERNATIVE: Approve preliminary replat ATTAG1111614t': Reduced plat Ueni.se Spivey Uevelopment Keview Planner U52,5g ' ' 11 W0t tODl I10e • 10. IfM Ofl N If ,9 IGRi I ~0 ill N 11 L!'14t CJU ['If ! ~ I 615 ~ i Q'SS I _ s, 1I t .._.1 II f I I N FM.4 8 t,1f[N r;' 'E--_. IMcKINNEY_STRE T)`~°',fi Pp9Nr AEOfyJVIG 1 I l fORI ` 9 ` 1 ll u .I 1 1k~ Ili . 0 '01 to , ~ •J' .{000 ' r •t I~rAII 0 ~1~~.-, t, _ _ lI1 t7~8 31 .f II' + 11-1 t ' efRAI 6CY.155 CR A[(q'~ISON CAe, C Ptt354 r0.~fltD ~ t i 10 RI INr„K IY ,I rr9~• ~tr~~, 6 .J uNA r•rTl9 ~ Ir,,,` `(YU ~ . r A .YOgf tt` y \ t't a IMP-II It, k -r rear /l01 M rf. 1440 L Ke 90 K - 1 a, 4. e t - - 9 s I e i Jr- • IMf~O r• - 'lj~ ' t I 1 ~ I I I I I~ 1 I I • ) ~ w 1 Ig jiiitl1H'21(89e ACRES ii i1 P.~y{ {i I`~9 I LI. 11 ~~C d, t Yx lI I I JFI I 444 L160910 JDsgiCN 1091110V \tfi ' I - q • I Kl I. k It l l i t X07 i 1 1 i A - Cv IT M !19 501 ~ IJ( NN I` t y - ~j ~4fA6TS wt. ' i'9 ~ !G,11 1 V it 10411 Mf •II I„'O vi. . ~91Ng1 18 M ; 1 I y O ''H'A \ Io ut n l Ir P p`n' 1 Ir. fi62 08' ~ r \ I.01 I t ptpt • r CITY COUNCIL SACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 5, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Commerce Center Addition SUMMARY: This 45.7 acre tract is located at the southwest corner of University Drive (Hwy 380) and the I,H, 35 service road. The property is zoned light in- dustrial (1,I) and the development of a motel and a warehouse/office park is anticipated. Adequate water supply is available to serve this development. A gravity sewer extension must be run across the frontage of this property by bor- ing under the railroad. No more than four (4) warehouses may be connected to the existing lift station pending completion by the City of the gravity sewer to the Hickory Creek Outfall line, Gas and electrical service will be available to this site. A channel must be constructed to handle the drainage from this development. Drainage im- provements should be put In when Lots 1 and 2 are developed. The access driveways to this property will be phased in as per the plan ap- proved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May lb, 1984, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, ALTERNATIVE: Approve preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat i eF nTse p I veyy Development Review Planner 0525g A: 1 F: fr I u 1 U I !1 I 4 [ _ - 1•PR1~1MP~d V.H w ~ r. it 1'•. .'rr,.lr,~~•-•• k, 1.~ 1 __S ......-~~.,.i..~'.",~-'_i I ,Nr*6i.: Iw T i 1; / r 14.j 1, r' ~~l~ .1 "LOCH I Z ' pT 3cl l fI1111\ 1 \ ~ ~ I to, io~ `fin ) 1 • ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 11 1 ~ ,y ~ ~ 4 r I l ' I ! / . • ~ _ c}tivrvt:rtmr Vt'tL !rlrr r ~ ~ - IL1RIit RIi7 rltr, •a',r. > SNOMh~fC4 NIN YI IM1,NJI frArCSfI tl4f I^. 1\'n4rl. Ir•U• r.'rq l ur F'r119FL1MINAPY PLAT 11NCIIII r(T,"IT AIW7:41 f1 n. , 1~ i L I I' ~kwll 16 10M4 ivini lilt ~.,ti 'r P ' ~'_itr--_•----.._ } 10 '1611F Vill 1%P "7;. . I r nr a I,rn ,r ry„ I I IN. rNfll rl , r rr I+ C[7MMrERCE CENT£.:R FILOC'1< 1 _ _ _ ' OMMeRC~I fra►nrre►s ' _la',P dear rr!: r nor n 4q ,P" q C'r , • ►R041MIN.d►fi~d PL.11r r .1rn'h '~4 r M1 rl .il 'I•. #.A r I. I, r1~. i,.p 1a,P~+.fVnd, r 60 DI/IIITOI•. thll I OfI Igp011f 11 d1 T'~A~IN MMA .YMN rowillIN llh J I ' CITY UUUNUIL AGIMDA uACK-UP SUMMARY SHEEP MEETING DA'Z'E: June 5, 1.984 SUdJEUT Approval of Cue preliminary plat of Lots 10 L, ~s, dlocie 1 ut Lou Jen ivi-e St. Addition SUMMIwy: Phis .99 acre tract Is located oi► LOU east side ut Jannie si:., approximately SUu, nortil of Last McKinney st, the property is zonet.i singie tamliy k8F-71 and single tanuly development is anticipated, Water and sewer facilities are available in utility easements adjacent to the property. GA3 and electric service is also available to the site. ACrJUN Kr;gUIK8D: Approval of preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: Tile Plaitnillg and Loving Uominission recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the condition that tilt: perimeter street ordinance applicable .tor the full langtn of their proper.c oil Jannie atrvet. ALTERNATIVE: Approve Lila preliminary plat: til'TAUHlrl"ivV: Keduced plat Denise Spivey Development Keview Planner USZJg u r- H I NA A C K ADDI! J^I a 31 I, / ! ' 1 ZONED SF-7 ! ~ r 4vt4.l,:~wn4 'r lo4lrw,4u 1q IunWlatTn4 I4 y, x'44 ,1 1 l.N u411 Id•,1 y/ S w C~A,14 LAK rt4Ct' 1 "SCNE~jr!91"!1 N. MK !4= I G'WAfER t, a~i ITS, EaSf titEr~~~V~08.42'~v - t.s. N88 14'E 1 I u ~ I h I 4144 II MWA41144 r 4 o r uJ 0 N I ~ ` h N 8 I4' E 206'.71' f s ~41 I ~ I' I LL 0 995 ac W x' I N g "L o r 2 aLL WWII ZONED SF- 7 u + N - N C440" L ,0 1,4 4M11°1,111li 1 bl . 20 .01 S"%q 7 I S 886 14'W 20 - N88°14'E 9 A' ro W 3. Y N. Ines 1 40 `~'~101, Q~~ vt 33 N + y lal I T,gna Ar/ (Q/1 11 I I ~ Y 4 a I I V~' , it f 'm L 0 r cr) a y----. 5szc -001 I F W,11 / VH 1E'44E _I -9~3 419[ ,,a , w 41~l a1~ _ - S 876 29'40'0 209.4 1 - i 41 I I Imwt, 'a . `1 411 It ).III it ZONED SF-7 I II Scale 1 C4 JO' 1 r-`} 611 a it 8 I 0 t 1 u1 1: ~ a f1 ~ tA.y,T y~ i .anT»r+h t 41n 1ru ItI1 4e4i-_y_~i1 ' VICINITY MAP 'J NOT Tp 501'_E CITY COUNCIL SACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: June 5, 1984 SUBJECT; Approval of the preliminary plat of Section One of the Windsor Park Addition SUMMARY; This 2 acre tract is locatod at the northeasa corner of Windsor Dr, and North Locust St, (F.W. 2164), The property is zoned planned development (PD) and duplex development is anticipated. A water line must be constructed on North Locusi St. and water and sewer lines must be built on Windsor Dr, to serve this development, Electric, gas, and phone service are available to the sit and streets are adequate for this development, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of preliminary plat RE COMMIiNDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, ALTERNATIVE: Approve preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat Uenniise Spivey e Development Review Planner OS25g 117 r 4 I Yle'virv M/r {1A~'t'ttJ4 (rr}1 (~1~J ; '.'F ~ N .a 1, Yl+l~ . J I t b~n~ i I 1 E b 1 b l.. .jl 11 ' 1 af ~.1`..Z:.Ir•'LI AT 'rr ..r ~ ~YII+:f1 IyN1Itl 4~Y M Narir iVll r... r. r + I `fr'f NSA` r' . is ! 11 , rN I~' • I -IE1 ,l I 1 II 1t-Yr' i j r - . IT 1. S14 Ij Aitsl SRl 11l f !N JNA I e,. s /N T 1 1 AL GVIf p toi NlV 6I rrw 1 I`~ 'A!0 71JIIIA 1711 1 1. so 4 lo $A 0 1!'14 1 rp+ rJ !A 1J I~ Il I II 11 1 ` N 1 . 1 ' f ~ [ FIGS OO! E (A+~e. ~ti7 ; } . \ \ \I 1 .u Mh e - t rFf F (m7 s..rl /,.I J USA r S (1) Aw/f,l..,tnui ' r h.,l~ e.,I J1.r .nn rn'Y7 r1..A..r r.r. MA.\~ w Vh I A,. Mwuf A..I1/J V.. PRELIMINANY I'LAT WINDSOR 'ARK SECTION :)NE 1'%1 ACS Y> ~ P 1x1 tlrr \+l to van n ~ \r+r M.rU OWNEIh JOH tnfi.YM' I DCHTON,TEIAl. HON-I3 NEVIlION MAY f, 1•P4 9URKE ENGIMEER0 ARIAN "WLM. 1.L' C ommmn"o cim erwwe `Y 1 IrEI~ CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 16201 TELEPHONE (817) t,i,6 ,4200 CITY OF DENTON DARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING MONDAY, MAY 2L, 1984 3, 30 P.H. SENIOR CENTER ;-lE;kH31,RS PRESI''N'I': Mike Campbell, Chairman Ronnie Roberts, Vice Chairman Jane Malone John TraveLle STAFF PRESENT: Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation Richard DILIgas, Superintendent of Leisure Serv*..es Texx Stewart, Administc,.ative Assistant Joy Hesch, Senior Secretary GUESTS PRESENT: Clovis Morrison, Gre<<ter De:lton Arts Council Raymond Pitts, Senior Center Advisory Council John Weist, Denton Record-ChronieLe Debra t•lcGuire, Fort Worth Star-Telegram L. MEF_'L'ING_C`AELED TO ORDER The meet my was called to order by Mike Caulpbell, Chaim:. 11. APPROVAL OF MINUTE',) On a motion by Jan tilal.one, second of John Travel 1. they nllnUtH'-a of the La:;L meeth-i(j woro approved. L L L . Ollb BUS i NES'S i Noue. IV, NEW BUSLNESS 1. Publ-ic Hearing on Master. Pl.arl: After a revir_w of the Master Plan by Steve and cumol(-~nts from Clovis Morrison and Raymond Pitt- thtl Boar,] unanimous Ly voted to recommciid the Haste P1.":111 to Lee City cou11n-i.l tor_ final Ipprclva1.. !1! 111:(1 QL'"OF A1 t'kl PF-0;"r" , .J f W '-i i l6 Va rks & Rocreation Board Moeting May 21, 1984 Page - 2 2. Review of Summer Programss Steve introduced Richard Dlugas, the new Superintendent of Leisure Services, wh(.) reviewed the department's summer program and announced the grand opening of the `forth Lakes fitness Center which is scheduled for Saturday, June 2. V. OTHER BUSUNESS John Travelie suggestod to the Board that :3 letter of appreciation be sent to all the advisory groups who lie Iped formulate the Master Plan. Due to severed. conflicts, the Board agreod that the next meeting will be July 9. V.1. ADJOURN On a motion of Johtl Travel.le, second of Ronnie Roberts, the meeting was adjournFA. I 501 S, Locust Denton, Texas 5-18-84 City Of Denton Industrial Development Authority Cris Hartung City Manager 215 E. McKinney RE: Designation of a Blighted Area. Location: North-East corner of Dallas Drive at the intersection of Smith Street. Dallas Drive frontage approximatly 301' and Smith Street frontage 3851. Project: Office/Warehouse Service Center consisting of approximatly 35,000 square feet Dear Mr. Hartung: Dallas Drive Development Croup, a Texas Limited Partnership is requesting the designation of a Blighted Area on the above described parcel of land. The proposed project will be the construction of an Office/Warehouse facilty that will provide space for 15-20 small businesses. The construction will be the concrete tiltwall type, similar to the 500 Center located at 500 S. Locust. The employment opportunities would be numerous with this many businesses locating in the project. In addition there: would a need for a project manager and a maintenance man. We would appreciate your consideration in declaring this area blighted and will look forward to working with you and your staf,f. If any further information is needed please give me a cell at 565-0235. Tk a~k ou, J hn Adami r. ~s 6 7 8 9 235- I 1 ' 12 I 14 O 1 ( l1 1 1 y lLfl: ~A~4Pp 50 Q 5d 9~ .4C 3 207. ` V- ( 7,6 7.5 7 16 L zoo' 5 52 50 50' i86 SMITH . 0 11 12 13 % 322 40 104' 75 116 T' 14 4 `MARVIN WILLS in 2 3.1 3,2 ADD'N. W 501 ~J r 100 3 . 14,1 79 zio21` 233 26893 - f -38 CL 14.3 14.2 Bros iJ c,J, 3 34 I' 2 67 2 70.3' KELSEY, GRE ORY, HOOT, AR Np PHILLIPS Aq,y70+ pTTORNBY$ AT•1 AW SUITe 611, FIRST STATe BANX &DO. RICHARD 1i- KsLssY DtNTON• TsxAs 16101 Mlxe 0alOORY 817/38719SM JUDO B. HOLT Me Tito: 00.1072 RONNteNILLIH April 13, 1984 Mr, William McDonald Denton City Hall 215 s, McKinney Denton, Texas 76201-04 Re= Designation of sli ible Bli hied Area Dear Mr, McDonalds on behalf of my client, Chris Bancroft, 1 would like to request that the City of Denton designate a certain area as an eligible blighted area so that Chris might obtain industrial Revenue Bond financing of a commercial project, To show you where the area is, 1 have enclosed two maps, one of them is taken from an earlier request for lighted area and shows in black the area previously The area that we are requesting to be declared blighted is marked in yellow on that map, i have also enclosed another map which gives a more detailed description of the property which aria withined are legg the area. The described land is bounded on the east by fort Worth Drive. Across the street on Fort Worth Driveacrossome service stations, a tire company, a vacant is an area and to south,balsiighndtiedcated North ofethehproperrty is Collins already Street where only one or two older houses are located. on the west is Cleveland e Sareerequestingatoebestermedeblightedr, end of the property ty it appears that no development has taken place along The houses are small, frame Cleveland Street in many years. Th the entire ones, and there are only five or six of. them along length of the street. Most of the lots on Cleveland, beat to east and west side, are vacant, some of the houses app on the east of Cl veland owners e The described area has an old gravel road leading off Collins Street that goes to the top of a hill where there are ruins of an old rock structure and burnedlat h uses. The entire property is overgrown with brush, es. s he very d ifficultato walk across. Thevsurveyorsdhadrtotdo and very ~•~x-arc 1 William MODOnald April 13, 1984 Page TWO clearing work before they could do their work. I would imagine that there has not been any clearing done for twenty years. All of the structures on top of the hill are in a deteriorated condition. we are submitting to the City Council that the condition of the described property substantially impairs and arrests the growth of the City, and for that reason, the area should be designated a blighted and/or economically depressed area. As you know, the designation of an eligible blighted area is a necessary first step in obtaining the bond financing. Chris plans to develop the 4.9 acres on the east side with two multi-storied office buildings of 20,000 square feet each, a 6,000 square foot restaurant and a 2,400 square foot building for several small shops. The office buildings will be leased to the public, the small shops will be leased to the appropriate businesses, and the restaurant will be operated by Mr. Bancroft, his subsidiary, or an entity controlled by him. Because of the higher elevation of the property, these buildings will overlook downtown Denton and be a credit to the City. Mr. Bancroft understands that there can be no curb cuts on Highway 377 side, which is the east side, so the intention is to have the entrance to the development from the north ?nd west sides. The other 4.0 acres will be used for a moderate density residential development. The Industrial Revenue Bond financing will be used only on the commercial part of the property. Chris estimates that there will be 23 new jobs created by this development (not including the construction), and that there will be an estimated annual payroll of $294,000.00 The amount of financing that Chris will apply for is 531312,166.00, I would appreciate your expediting this as soon as possible, If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, r Judd Holt JH/tb _ - - ` Enclosures cci client 777-77 ~ eo' ~ 4 tip l TRACT #13 TR 133 TRACT 413 Q C ~w TRACT wq •/1 1.4 TRACt 1 0 TRAC' *13 TRACT N135 ANO 0 8 1.3 C TRACT 412 208 2 X47 1SO' TRACT 4135 TRA .o Q d' z TRACT 412 "1 N So Q ~e f f 4 0 2.1 •4 2 N ,so T CT #121-2 TRACT #137 W 8. ..J 7, U TRACT 012 TRACT 4127 & 0145.7, a 119 87 L •D 0 J+ 0' N A ti V 2- All NING PGANBIACK-UNDSUOMMARY SHIEEETSSION To; Denton City Council Meeting Date! June 5, 1984 Case No.~ Z-1658 Q NERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Melvin Haisler Rt. 8, Box 75 Denton, TX 76202 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: Loathe zoningeftraomil (rORicultural (A) classifi- ration Purpose: Future development Location and Si^o! Approximately 0.8 acre parcel located adjacent and east of. F.M. 2164 (North Locust) and at the northeast corner of F.M. 2164 and proposed Loop 288 Existing Land Use: Single family residential and agricultural Surrounding Land Use North - Single family, vacant, and Zoning: agricultural; Agricultural- (A), E.T.J. South Vacant, single family; Agricultural (A), E.T.J. East - Agricultural, vacant, single family; E.T,J. West - Agricultural, vacant, Agricultural (A), Denton Development Guide: Area is tdesignated as moderate (case # 1-1658) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: Drainage chould be handled by Loop 298, Transportation Locust is designated as a primary major and Traffic: arterial and 1201 of right-of-_1,1ay is required, Right-of-way for hoop 288 has already been purchased. Both Loop 288 and North Locust are state highway department responsibilities, ANALYSIS The petitioner is the current owner of the subject 0,8 acre tract and has entered into a contract for sale contingent upon approval of the change in zoning. The prospective buyer ':8 a convenience store developer, Staff has been informeu of plans for development of a convenience store at some point in the future. The prospective buyer has indicated that convenience store development will not occur until after Loop 286 is constructed. Planned development (PD) zoning is not being requested, therefore, no gti:arantues in terms of time of development and type of development are available. The site of this request is located in a moderate intensity area. (general retail (OR) zoning and land use at this site will not violate density/intensity standards largely because there is so much undeveloped property in the area, Currently intensity is allocated on a "first come - first serve" basis and the attempt to secure retail zoning before construction of Loop 288 has been admitted. It is difficult to analyze site planning issues that are important today, but will become even more important as Loop 288 develops. The principle negative aspect of this case based on present conditions appears to be the danger of establishing a strip retail and commercial zoning along F.M. 2164. Strip retail and commercial zoning and land use is strongly discouraged along major thoroughfares and entries into the City. CONCLUSION The site in this request is located in a moderate intensity node designated with the major intersection of Loop 288 and North Locust in mind. Staff has reservations about general retail (GR) zoning at this site when analyzed in terms of existing land use conditions But, the proposal comprised with the development Guide intensity/ density standards and a recommendation of denial would be inconsis- tent with the current "first come - first serve" approach to intensity allocation. (Case N Z-1658) Page Three RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1658 by a vote of 6-0. ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENT 1. Aerial 2. Reply Form Total 3. Property Owner List I 4. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of May 16, 1984, I 04908 p ?r Z 1688 • 1 • 0 OWNS= td Obi V4 A SF•t0 T 1 $F•7 IPD~ f- PROPERTCIOOWNER REPLY FORMS COUNCIL Z-1658 IN FAVOR !N -OPPOSITION UNDECIDED ,7, B, Haisler None Received Route 8, Box 78 Denton, Texas I i I f. { r ~ .11 ~I ~ I jl ~I ~ ~ y^{y~_-JI ~iL.~.4.~Y 1~_.-_--_•-_•____-__-.---_•_-_..._._.~__.___. I - - ! - i ~ P & 2 Minutes May 16, 1984 Z-1658, This is the petition of Melvin Ftaisler requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the general retail (GR) classification on an approx- imately 0.8 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of FM 2164 (North Locust) and proposed Loop 288. UNAPPROVED) Mr. Ellison stated two reply forms were mailed to property owners with in 200 feet of the subject property and two were returned in favor. Mr, Gunter Knight stated he was the purchaser of the property from Mr. Haisler and his intent was to put a convenience store on the property, He added he is part owner of the EZ Check and Howdy Doody stores. Mr. Ellison explained the surrounding land use and zoning and stated the area is designated as moderate intensity. He added Locust is designated as a primary major arterial and 120 feet of right-of-way is re- quired. Right-of-way for Loop 288 has already been purchased and both Loop 288 and North Locust are state highway department responsibilities. Fie further stated the proposal comprised with the Development Guide intensity/density standards and a recommendation of denial would be inconsi`stant with the current "first come-first serve" approach to intensity allocation, therefore staff recommends approval of G-1658. Chair declared public hearing closed. Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1658. Seconded by Mr, Sidor and carried unani- mously (6-0). tJO, All ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0,651 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF 'THE THOMAS TOBY SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0, 1288, DENTON COUNTY, TEXASI AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSt SECTION I, The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follow- u19 described property, to-Witt All that certain 0,d51 acres of land, a part of the Thomas Toby Survey, Abstract No, 1288, in the City and County of Denton, Texas, ana BEGINNING in the west line of the tract conveyed to Melvin Haisley by deea Of record in Volume 1353, Page 179, in the Deea Hecoras of saro county a found iron pin at the northwest corner of a tract awardeo to the State of ;eras in Cause No, 10,443 In the county court of said county for Loop Number 288 on the east linv of Farm to Market Highway Number 2164 or Locust Street, for the western southwest corner of this: 0 'THENCE north 01037151' east 200,66 feet with the east line of Farm to Market Highway 2164 to an iron pin set for northwest corner of this: THENCE.' south 68052127' east 151,52 feet to an iron pill set for the northeast corner of this! THENCE south 01437'51' west 254,34 feet to an iron pin founa on the north line of Loop 28b for auuthaast corner of this: THENCE north 8701)81021 west. 105,9 feet with the north line of Loop 288 to iron pin found at angle point tut southern southwest comer of this; THENCE north 40144112' west 67,73 feet with the right of way line of said Loop 288 to the place of beginning, is hereby chanyed from Agricultural 'A' District Classification Use to General Retail 'GR' District Classification and Use unuer the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, Tne zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, adoptea the 14th day of January, 1969, as an AppendiX to the Code of Ordinances of the City Of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No, 69•-1, oe, ana the same is hereby amenaea to show such change in District Classification ana Use, SECTION 11. That the Ci.ty Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby Elms that such change is in accuroance with a comprehensive plan for tha purpose of pio,noting the general welfare of the City of Denton, rexas, ana with reasonaole consideration, among Z-1568/114ELVIN HAISLER/PAGE i other thinga for the eharaccec of the district and toe its peculiar suitabillty oC particular uaea, and with a viaw to conserving the value of the buildings, protacttng human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for tea maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its eltiaene. SECTION 1I;, That this ocdinance shall be in full force and effect iinmediatuly after its ppassage and approval, the required publi: nearings naving heretofore been held by the Planning and toning Commission ano the Clty Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after givcng due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPRUVED this the day of 198. RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTI CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY 3ECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J, TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS By Z-1568/MELVIN HAISLER/PAGE i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACK-UP sS RY fttPM MEETING DATE: June 50 1984 SUBJECT; Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 81.44 acres of land beginning at Swisher/Shiloh Road, (A-1) SUMMARY; The property in this case is located on the south side of Paige Road, west of Swisher Road and north of the MK&T Railroad. A manufactured housing subdivision is proposed on 66.5 acres a portion of which is already within the Denton city limits, and a mobile home park is proposed on approximately 40 acres imme- diately west of the manufactured subdivision, Approximately 430 units are proposed for the manufactured housing subdivision and approxi- mately 230 units are anticipated for the mobile home park for an ultimate population of approxi- mately 1500 people, Existing land use on the 01.44 acre tract con- sists of one single family dw611ing and a sewer lift, station with the remainder of land being vacant, The existing population of this tract of land is approximately 2 persons, Surrounding land uses include to the north single family dwellings on Swisher Road and at the corner of Paige Road and Swisher Road. To the west is Swisher Road and the Chaparral Estates subdivi- sion. The Chaparral Estates subdivision lies in the town of Shady Shores. Land use on the east side is vacant land and further on to the east is an existing mobile home park and land use to the south is Shady Shores Road. Ultimate devel- opment of the tract as proposed will generate approximately 3,960 one way vehicle trips per day divided between Paige Road and Swisher Road. Both of these roads are county reads wLth only a sealcoat surface. This property is located outside of the City of Denton's master drainage plan but major flood- plain is shown on county F.E.M.A. maps, The developers must follow all. F.E.M.A. guidelines on map revisions and amendments, City council Baok-Up Summary Sheet Page Two SUMMARY Water service options include (1) extend an 8 (continued): inch water line from the existing 8 inch main near 1-35E and Paige Road, down Paige Road across the northern property frontage, All off site extensions are eligible for pro-rata con- tractural reimbursement, (2) Extend an a inch water line from the Denton side of the Corinth water meter and 1-35E, bore the interstate and extend down Shady Shores Road across the south- ern property frontage. (3) Provisions for use of a private well are included in the Hubdivi- sion regulations, Article 14.10-B. However, economic justification is required and current policy is to encourage extension of water mains with pro-rata reimbursement, Limited analysis of the lift-station-forcemain system indicates that neither one has sufficient capacity to handle both existing approved devel- opment plus the proposed development. Under current City policy and Article 4,09A-IA of the subdivision regulations it will be the devel- oper's respunsibility to provide adequate facilities to serve their development, If the property is not annexed into the City, but connected to City water and sewer lines, the Building Inspection Division will inspect pri- vate lines for compliance with the City plumbing codes, If the property is annexed, all City building codes will apply to the development. F19CAL SUMMARY: A variety of techniques are available for fiscal impact analysis, among these techniques the ser- vice standard fiscal impact method was selected because of its usefulness in predicting the impact of proposed development, land use alter- natives, and annexation, As used here the service standard method relies on the U.S. Census of Governments tc obtain general averages of manpower and capit,11 facility service levels for municipalities of similar size and geogra- phic location, The service standard method, as prepresented here, relies on average employment levels and a relationship of annual capital-to-operating expenditures to estimate the expected increment and local municipal expenditures. These ratios, drawn from a national sample and expressed per thousand population, differ for communities of city council Back-Up Summary Sheet Page Three FISCAL SUMMARY varying size and by region, This technique (continued): determines the total number of additional em- ployees by service function that will be required as the result of growth, It is of paramount importance to recognize that there is no simple way to obtain and manipulate national standards for different service categories of municipal operating and capital expenditures, All three areas proposed for annexation were considered together in arriving at the fiscal impact analysis and all fiscal impact assess- ments assume ultimate development. In the enclosed analysis: Alternative #1 Assumes that all proposed de- velopment actually develops as proposed. Alternative #2 - Assumes development occurs as proposed except the 200 site built houeus and the 95 manufactured homes. Alternative #3 - Assumes that only the devel- opment along the south side of Paige Road and the manufactured housing subdivision east of Grissom Road develops. A comparison of the anticipated revenues to be generated by each of the alternatives is en- closed along with a bar graph showing the cost revenue of each alternative. ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing (no other action is required) ALTERNATIVES: 1. Hold a public hearing 2, Choose not to annex this property and discontinue annexation proceedings SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental budgets RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of annexation. FXIiIBi'1'5: 1. Fiscal Impact Analysis 2. Service Plan 3. Map 9. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 16, 1989. ar es S, ~Iat ns, en or P anner ALTr:>zNATIVE ' I I Idanpopor I EsfI ied ( OPer8tln9 I Total C'aPltoI -tn- I Total I Tr. -n al Ant IcIpatcA I Governmoniel I Raiic6 For I Num~or Expenses ( Annual I OPc,ratIo9 I Annual Per ;os's Population I Funci Ions I Populatlon I of I Por I CY,erating ! Ratios For I Cap Iial I f c- + 1 I EIze I Future I Futu"e I Costs by I P, UIat lon I Costs by I r+) ~y 1 ,rou; ( Frilepef- [~rcIloyees I Furrilon I `,I:e C"i,up I'unciIon 3,664 1 C"n, Control 1 .55 1 2,02 1 S 45,455 1 S 91,796 1 .011 I f 1,099 ! f F07 I Finance 1 .57 1 2,10 1 23,563 1 49,524 1 .006 1 297 1 L, I Police I 2.17 1 7.99 1 29,804 1 238,133 1 .047 1 11,192 I .3:5 I Flre 1.7§ 1 6.44 26,743 1 185,104 1 .029 1 5,368 1 472 rut l c Works I 3,50 1 44,551 1 155, WE 1 452 1 70,479 1 z':' I I I ' I hater/So%or 1 .74 1 2.72 1 57,07b 1 155,252 1 440 1 68,310 1 t2 i Sanitation 1 1,44 I 5.30 I 43,849 1 232,399 1 .104 1 24,169 1 66 I ParY,s L Re<. I 1.00 3.66 1 23,091 1 84,974 1 X148 1 12,576 1 `,50 1 Library 1 .20 I 74 1 22,917 1 16,956 1 .031 1 525 1 483 I I I I I I S 995 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I ! I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 0123s SC 1 AI,`UMNATZVE; ff 2 I Idanpo%or I Estimated I operating I Total CtpltaI -to- I Tonal I To+i e.,rnLia Ant ICIpatocf I Governmenial I Rados For I Numter I Expenses I tnoual operating i Annual Put (.Osts I Population I FvnclIons I FopuIoiIor) I Cf I Per i C4erating I Rotlos For I Ca;?Ital ng + Skzo I Future Future 1 Cpsis by i PCpulailOn I Ccsis t+y by nn 1 6raip _ Enploli.es I FmpIC}Ic-a i Fj:ricclcr, 1 Slae C:cup Funcilun I lc n ^I~ S,iOE Gen, Control I 55 1 1,71 4 45,445 1 77,710 I ,011 l i 054 1 i f,!64 „91 1 Finance 157 1 1,77 1 23,"0 41,741 1 1006 I 250 1 I Police i 2,17 1 6,75 f 29,AG4 1 201,177 1 .047 1 9,4`'5 1 02 I fire I 75 I x.44 I 26, 747 1 SI I .029 1 4,534 1 895 1 Pit Iic hCrks 1 .95 I 2.95 1 44,"51 425 1 .4`,2 1 59,404 1 p:),P29 N 57 07E I 131,279 I 44J 1 57,7x2 I C~41 i 5ar,ltalIon I 1.44 1 4,.1 1 43,549, 1 o5,4r,3 I 104 1 70,450 1 i,87J 11 1 27,091 1 71,E13 1 14E I 10,tr25 I ;.:,441 I earl,;, d Fie. , i 1.00 I 3 , I Library i .20 I .62 I 22,917 I 14,205 E X031 I 440 1 64P I ! 1 i I I I I S >",914 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 i I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ALTERNATIVE I Manpower I Estimated I Operating 1 'I'otaI I Capltal-to-1 Total Tota' annual An'Iclpafc G.wer,,mental I Patios For I Number I Expenses I Annual I Operating I ~;^nual Pue COSts PopuIatIor i Functions I Population I of Per I C~,oreting 1 Ptllos For I COP)Ta 11C;:.~ ".iirg i I Size I Future I Future I Costs by I ropula+lon I iosts !,y I C,r.~w Cy I U'rc F" co,c- s~I Empfoycos I Fumctlcn ( N .w Coup I Fun, ilor 1 2,616 Gen. Control I .55 I 1,44 i 4 45,455 1 3 65,440 1 011 I f 719' 1 159 V Finance 57 I 1.49 I 23,583 ! 35,138 1006 1 210 1 " ,346 I Police 1 2.17 1 5169 1 29,604 1 169,584 1 .047 1 7,970 1 " ,556 1 fire I 1.75 1 4.59 1 26,743 1 131,930 1 .029 1 3,825 1 ".,755 I Public WorY.s I .95 1 2.49 1 44,551 1 110,931 1 .452 1 50,140 1 tt,071 M'etnr/Sewer 1 .74 1.94 1 57,076 1 110,731 1 .40 1 48,721 1 x,452 1 Sanitation 1 1,44 1 3.77 1 43,649 1 1b5,310 I 104 1 17,192 1 ,502 1 Pe. rF.s L Rec. I 1,00 1 2.62 1 23,091 1 60,498 1 .148 1 6,953 ( t?,451 1 Library 1 .20 1 .52 1 22,917 1 11,916 1 .031 1 369 1- 285 I I I I ! f 579 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I i 1 1 I I I I I 1 k i C1'.?s sc MUN'ICIFAL RE1'FNUES BY SOURCE Alt. N1 Alt. 62 Alt. R3 Own Source Revenue Taxes Property/Personal Tax $ 270, 55 t; $193,838 $159,960 Utility Franchise Tax 39,907 34,933 28 339 Ch a 2•g es/misc. Recreation/Ambulance Fees 8,858 7,'146 6,291 Fines 31,314 26,316 22,236 Water/SeI;er 460,500 387,000 327 ,000 Sanitation 124,3:15 104,490 58,290 1ntergovernrnentaI Transfers State Sales Tax 160,021 134,479 113,639 Federal Revenue Sharing 43,691 36,718 1,025 CDBG 43,483 36,545 30,683 TOTAL; $1,182,668 $,961,765 $807,46: 0142-, JC L Lit 1 t ' "MM E /iJ/r AN 5 1 1 r PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 070a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a cite prior to passage of an ori_nance annexing an area; n.nd WHEREAS the City of Denton iS CoI'tempI'tin;; ;wine::ati,~, of area ;hich is bounded as shown on a :nap of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C'-ITT OF MENTON, TEXAS; Section 1. Pursuant to tY:e provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed anw.~xation area the following plan of service; I. Basic Sei`vice Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and of::r routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effec-,•;e date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street and other traffic control devices will be ins-alled as the need therefore is established by app-_r.-'late study and traffic standards, B, Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, azd thereafter from new lines as extended in acc..-dance with article 4.09 of appendix of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in 7-;ie annexed areas will be corn -cted to sewer lilies in accordance with article Of appendix A of the code of the City of Ienter., Texas, E. Refuse Collection (1) Tl:e sanle regular :'e'!l1F>e collection service S' prnr vided within the cit}' will he extended to annexed area wit hi. l: one m(-) ;th afte r the c,f: date of annexat.i(..~. Servioe Plan Anr.extid Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Eme:.gency maintenance of streets (repair of rdous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic t' etc will begin on the effective date of annexati::;, (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in pres)nt city, wi17. begin in the annexed area the effective date of annexation, (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, i- ;aila- tion of storm drainage facilities, construct'.: of curbs and gutters, and other such major impr.- -..ents, as the need therefore is determined by the =rning body, will be accomplished under the establ~__ed policies of the cite, G, Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the :_-v (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housir. sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexati:--. area on the effective date of annexation, H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the :.-y will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will the:.- fter encompass the annexed area, I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the subs.an- tially developed areas in accordance with tt: established policies of the city, J, Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all ex-_szing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation, The same standards end policies now used in the present city will fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program -.-.d facilities in the enlarged city, K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Dent,__ for electric power, Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L, Miscellaneous (1) street name signs where nee ded ~ti.13. be installe-. within a} }:ro~:iraately (3 mont}~s of to the effect e date or annexation• II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such police g'.,Iide- lines as, (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitu,:e of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city. (3) Impact on overall city economics, The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in. the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year frc:n the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city, Vii', j i ; ~ ~ I I , .-....t ~ \ i~..... r+= tom`{ r ~ k 'I 1, ` J'`r 1, l i ~ ~ fii~! zT-- ° " ~t _ ~ ' -%=+'"'`~_~.1".._f„+ 1 ~ ~ ',ice 4'•~i i i--" L 01 is ~y`~~ i .-...-~..-.rr. •.-'7 ;•L'`"`~':-.C j ~i 1 ' ~ tl..~----•'---~ ~ ~ I r 1 _ ~ fi"""r ~ ~ I ~ i r 1 ~ I / , I 1 ter..,. ~ \ M 1 • i P & Z MINUTES 5/16/84 K. Consider making a recommendation on the proposed annexation of approximately 81.44 acres of land located on the west side of Swisher Road south of Paige Road (A-1). (UNAPPROVED) Mr. Watkins stated the property is located on the south side of Paige Road, west of Swisher Road and north of the MK&T railroad. A manufactured housing subdivision is proposed on 66.5 acres, a portion of which is already within the Denton City Limits, and a mobile home park is proposed on approximately 40 acres immediately west of the manufactured subdivi- sion. He further stated approximately 430 units are proposed for the manufactured housing subdivi- sion and approximately 230 units are anticipated for the mobile home park for an elentua1 population of approximately 1500 people. He added the exist- ing land use on the 81.44 acre tract consists of one single family dwelling auud a sewer lift station: with the remainder of land being vacant. He explain- ed the surrounding land uses and existing populatic n and added ultimate development of the tract as pro- posed will generate approximately 3,960 one way vehicle trips per day divided between Paige Road and Swisher Road. Both of these roads are county roads with only a sealcoat surface. He explained the property is located outside of t%e City of Denton's master drainage plan but major floodplain is shown on county Federal Emergency Management Administration (F.E.M.A.) maps and than the developers must follow all F.E.M.A. guidelines on map revisions and amendments. He continued water service options include (1) extend an 8" water line from the existing 8" main near I-35E and Paige Road, down Paige Road across the northern property front- age; all off site extensions e.re eligible for pro- rate contractural reimbursement. (2) Extend an 8'" water line from the Denton side of the Corinth water meter and I-35E, bore the interstate and extend d,wn Shady Shores Road across the southern property fr.int- age. (3) Provisions for use of a private well are included in the subdivision regulations, Article 14.10-B. However, economic justification is required and current policy is to encourage extension of water mains with pro-rata reimbursement. Mr. Watkins stated that limited analysis of the ''-net- station-forcemain system indicates that neither has sufficient capacity to handle both existing approved development plus the proposed developme:-.t. Under current City policy and Article 4.09A-lA o the subdivision regulations it will be she develc)per's responsibility to provide adequate facilities tc serve their development. fie added if the property is annex- ed, all City building codes will apply to the development, Page 2 Mr, Watkins presented an economic analysis +::o the commission and stated the Planning and Community Development Department recommends continuation of annexation proceedings. Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approval of the proposed annexation of approximately 81,44 acres of land located on the west side of Swisher Road south of Paige Road (A-1). Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried,(5-4), TOWN OF SHADY SHORES P, 0, SOX 362 LAKE DALLAS, TEXAS 75065 Mav 5, 1~SA Nr, Charles VoIkins Planninand Zoning Ci.v of I)~-nton cr',nev Street hentnn, Icsaf:' 76 ..fl1 fear atkinst the i'Iannine crud 7oninc• Coir,mission of the 'faun of Shady Shores, Tcza, urges the annexation by the Cit• of benl.uTi of the Swisher Road pro1) ert:1 bordering on the Chal)nrIaI Estates subdivision, an area of. acre plus plots, A propo;,cd mobile home part:/modular hoine development i<oui d (I("-cease :-he yalti c of the 1) C''rne s in Chaparral Estate s ca11sidcInt)Iv, fercly the rumor cf an ndiricent mobile home park trlreadv has fouled the sale of property in the area, The establ.isiirr.ent of a buffer zone consisting of the flot)d zone and a sma11 p rtion of t_he land frontinc; on s,her k o a d by the cein etarv wou]d ire appreciated, A buf:e. area would 1) e1l~ maintain the present property values and a:Z. W0U.1d lessen the use of Swisher Road vhi_cI is in poor repa' to accommo4atc anv additional traffic, Very truly yours, Thomas Dues ma n Chairman Plc+nning attd 70tjing Commi5Si: CLrf. rls D, -~canc~S0N A9T OWNVY A9' t.AN' NIMA n1.1'11A NOAD. HITITE 6 0n1.1,AN. Tb7xn" asvao 4' i 45~H1). L'7U1 :`iF:\' ?lr. Charlie Watkins Senior Planter Department of Planning and Co^,muniLy Development Municipal Building 215 i:ast XcKinney Denton, TX 76201. Re; 66,5129 acres of land situated in the CIDEON k'ALUR SUULY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330, Denton County) Texas Dear Mr. Watkins; The purpose of this letter is to diolleSS the subiect Of annexation to the City of Denton of the above.-referenced land. As you know, RWGP is applying for planned development zoning on this land. In this connection, RWGP formally requests that the issue of zoning and annexation be considered simultaneously pursuant to Article 21, Section C of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton. RWGP requests that the City of Denton annex the land upon granting planned development zoning. Should no planned development :zoning be granted the land) thep RWGP formally requests that the City of Denton not annex the land at this time. IN. Watkins, I can understand the City's concern over possible unregulated development of land generally. Let me assure you, however, that there will be absolutely no development on this land of any kind unless and until the land is annexed into the City. You have my per- sonal promise and word on that, as well as the promise of RWGP. My only hesitation on annexation at this time is that 1 do not want this land to be saddled with the burden of City taxes unless either (i) some development is likely to occur on the land or (ii) ~ other land,in the area also participates in the tax scheme. {I'. Chnl'.~.le Wa Lkins Page two F lease 1:eC~ 1'' 1n:Z filled as t0 the IN*' s lilLut,tiOils 1'egaI'diIle the annexation of. RWGPIE, land, Kind rogards, Sincerely Curtis 1), 1{ocifsen," 1':'esident: S6'GF, inC. CDH;,j sh cc; Dr. Hobert LaForte Ch irr.:an, Planning and 'Zoning C'omnlission 291: Croydon Denton, TS 76241 411. +':4'.11i i~ r X. a r _ - r er,e.;EC ..r.e _rc;,__ f1C:.1'it CL: CCU'~G )•.s i r.,e:.tio;'.ed, t'«°, _r, it8e1., Gc\s o C1:1LC tC our sc;lee e veal add aC ~'rC}:1`cLel'~' l t. _ c n CG5` ?stl:idtEG tC t/e <F_.G4.C, YC;. Veal' Or` .na 1.iCl.. alC xe~ 1 1 i C l' ai., re ati\e 1~ ecuip.,:ert, The cost would ren Uercent incl-ease added each year 'orY t'~1e Succee 1.1 twc ears to a tY:ird year cost of Si,04E.00. t."G streets are de ?eloped and curbed, the mew`. na 'c-,:` d be terminated. Please advise if you need ar. adcitional information. Rcbe.:t K, Tic~ner ZN~( 3rJ . ar.rt»y4 1 ,fr AL F:IL ~~n 1: P: 70: ).r 1/ C. 1 r f 1 11 ~ . n i C.iI:., I e Planner FEW M17; clack, ScAcr QVI f ♦*l•.e r0110'I, ng are es L.dtt'a cc Sts , till' c:.. 'n A c a W arne;:ec are S;a1 coat , trr.e..s 21a Ln in D & t'E::aL _ 1:411 require i0...mwmce (patching) and a Sea'- cc-i-t CZ Y.r Cc•.ts oL,tS i) Fetcliin~ - 6b12 FT K d 1 ,2 ile 1.25 -11 1 cs x 4.5000/mi/.~r= 25 O;'ir 2) Sl:al Coats - 6612'x2]7,k32 SY 17,632 SY x 1,00/SY - S5,9OC'/Yr 3) Costs - D a i n a g e Estimate 2 %':eek•s v,ork r, x2000/Day 10 day x 4'1000/Day $•10 Dti .l;'AG TOTAL C: )SI SiRr.E':S AN 1) F.. Engineering ar,d Inspection Costs: a C! - f T 7, C LO 1, CtI'S ;E ` C'.. E t. @ C''c L C r.C _E S i. I' C.:C E - C^ E'• r t: _ SCI'. T.'! L C: I L1E"i,_.1 l c° .:i C1 C C: L t tCE t: t,'E l . 1 - r , C ~'.E L_~ I °t.I ~F ~CCI °tC :~C-C tC. Ct'CC tC` C CV Ei l'E 'r-• •e t ~ i:uE .l' `IC\_.C C. `C _:CE SC-r ..CC .:C C. C rC. nd cC VC!':'Ci cS tC f .`lECi CC :"5 C S t t~~nL tCE i",L r' t: GC1t1C:,E1 C c.. .~C_C SEiSi'1'\' C`S~L1Ci~' .,t ilCir }ic\'E, C1' iCrLI,~rE Zit C. r't C Sei,i lv w t It L. 1. ..C SUDE2'?" SC Y ^ ] ' Er St'ft _r ;;C ter LiC1C:, ii Gi t}i E. Clt a5 iaCE 1i ^,;p:'cci: le fCl' OIC- pet.cn CC 'GE'Cua tEl\ SL, t `iS E1C;)t OI' CC-n paClcl. C'ff~CC2'S SCattErC'.d throuF}',oLt Che Clt\', .rhE 1Gab.',1iC11 adECi lic tCl\' SUpe Y\'16E iS :ast appi oaChing the CYitic al Sta'9C-. T}1 i.S 1s dUe tc! a lack o` expEricnce in the Patrol o::icEr posont, e zd, bona] areas rt'c,pcsed si-,culr' not be'hc.ld fully reSponSi'ble fer th--se a.:'11Ci0ilal COStS .`02'Ceen 6iLh--'i~ the pel-1Ce CE'part-rent. .;tie aGCi ti C rlc.:. 2'2SOU 2'CC 1:lenCiOned above c:'E' al:ecd:~ i,EE'.dEd dUE' t0 paSt `t'YO1CCti7. £'reE iiit}1 t11e ri is@C i02' anti E::a ti0i25 in an c* fort CC' CC!1trCI OB\'E li'~':E :'.C In ::r ens adjacent c-ni t0 tltC C --*t': bUt CUr re SC'd I'CC'S `.'e C C!', Ed to the 2 1, ii"E. i`IfsE3iL rnd l:'1 tll Jl:t S C. :3 CME IEl L_ Ci C:~S Z: e 4'Oi;lF 1 C =•'°;CL .lice pr Waing v CLL . K"17 " to _ - EfC'l.iC:, 1C £ C.SLC'_C.t toCnty-f C'y ,.:F i .:CG:.i:C' .k. "C •!iCc C':- _.'c. Ft .~irt F c 'o e this crma lcn will e he.. N; 'cU Cc1Erot rot"! the em; e.- 1 Nvolv& in the annexation, C F'c fce r 1 1 1~'It:l`C1R.h1yDUIr1 ,n. •fo; Charles ~latl<irls, ~rnic;r F~arlncr FRO%! Jack Cr'!-,t!'y, Fre Chief Shia the Fire JCS.'.. ~r!1 rl i)~I cl ! Cycllll Ji .'C d l.l( f'. ul r',1 ~~:tlCnc~ iC , I• ,l L' ! I~-~. - 1 :t ~4 , fl1'C. E' i\ C. 1(. O is it is dcr,e ill i'l, T 5.j1; ~F~ a'hC7 SCAEf ti as .c. i'~1'rl CZSi C~~1!'~hf\' TUYCIf ill(. 1'C 1:o Ll r1 a1 c c"'. ~~'C~ I1\r:,c:l"Itc, 1(C' coula' nat Illancile a slruclul'e fil(.. , t0 C l C As fail' is Iou ic1)E lic:1 (i~l c!ld Ili e Vl 1',o',Iid hC I°GS~ .r'li. `sS lb I jl'Sh .D !'o i2 f_! f1'P CC S10 , C y0 U 1hoY ' Y '.1C1' fl!.,a1 ' fE-- Z- ~.e to cIC Ill c ri o1'el' lie next t}h!ce yew's Cl ij L:i1, C: fi!'l I'aSllc c.'1:.. r0C1•r•1Crllr ar. flll'nlSh C'larll•X We I', lOdi:\':~ CCS~ iL L't1,iC oriE { file EJI- s allCn 'i \\.:uIC: 1 cost api~I'oxImately one- lhalf mi11ic+n dolIL s, to !..")y la1-1d l~wld slatlc!n, I'DU l') - U ll 0C 'a r ~e 1. so rl!lei ca c. i, 1:ar Ci:%i~C. I'atL!s aC C C:, I: ! ;?1~1 C1 c n d t: !l a tl a= I- M I11 t}le f!vC, (S~ Ea!' c8j ital ImprC,v :ile!1t p,roU,1. In 1',e }la1'E fife sui;-siatlon 011 line 'or con"4''L1Ction in 1~OE-cc, The location Of il's. SUb-'SSaSIC?.1 Ic c<-mc-• where in the vici!hity of Pideevray Li)d Teasley La11e, i!-t the southeastern section of the city. 1'e will be proposing fire sub-stalion G in 191.)_00 to be located in the vicinity of Bonnie Brae and V indsor (in North Lakes Park) . Currently we are looking at substation "7 in 1994 on I- and Ylayhill Rd. if the trend in crowth continues in that direction, and then fire sub-station =E soinev,here on ?80 East if the c,rovrth continues in that direction as is naly 2nti- cipated. This station would probably come in late 1000. ~ul}'. L'l ntry C 1 11 JG ~c - OF DMaOtl 1Y} r~ :d 0 R A V D l' F...,1CY ...lll.; 4' F 11 C'E ~ ~i dt..,. PCt~~7 l 1.: r~ 'C LIE a LZ' ..i.. .'.cl _ l 1. Y.CI: G\'E7, C 5t7C'etS C _IL E'. tP 'ls a °t7EEt li C:• `t :6B:£ at C:.,....:E '~iri1 `•_.i t EYYc..E L"CS': 7CC"CcC 1: .'?'YB 1'Cf. :'~E•'=' -`t - t =7C~c i.G C_'ECf1 .cC ~1-t1E$, i❑E E=t,. ni BG ' ;.',.C L~)r C CpETIF Crrt. It _ Ea. ' r. C anl18 t.~ t.IC 1l entC' ~iUn cija C:ECt 7iC C': J.~t. Cs i~ct C e 7+ E t 7 L C. t. C- C ;LtC i ..C-, al'Cas, ttlel': Yal G'CUi6 CC CCClt7act Ic7 £t Yt 2:. l]ght service \-itn Tc?:a8 !'ower aG.C LiFlht 2£ GC`:a i'iGi:G b\' t}1E ?'C s_3 e7.t£. / J ET : es cc: Bob Nelson file ,i..,^.: fl ~C. ~ ~r t I i Y'v~. s~ / ~ y. 1. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACK-Up SUMMAR~ME MEETING DATE: June 5, 1984 SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 522.76 acres beginning 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the center line of U.S. Hwy 380. (A-3) SUMMARY; There are two separate developments proposed within the area to be considered for annexa- tion, There is a 280 acre tract of land which is located north of Mills Road and on both sides of Grissom Road where a 50 acre mobile home park is proposed along with the balance of the prop- erty being proposed for site built houses on lots of at least one acre in size, Another development is proposed on the east side of Grissom Road and this is a 130 acre tract of land which is proposed to be divided into 6,000 square foot lots in all probability for owner occupied manufacturing housing. The developer of the 280 acre parcel of land has already begun some work with respect to development of the site built houses including installation of a water well and some water lines, it is antici- pated that 550 units will be developed on the 130 acre site, that approximately 200 site built houses will be developed within the 280 acre parcel along with an approximately 50 acre mobile home park. The roads servicing this area are county roads with only a sealcoat surface on Grissom Road and Mills Road simply consisting of a gravel road, The proposed land uses will generate substantial traffic on these roads. ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing ALTERNATIVES; 1. Hold a public hearing 2. Discontinue annexation proceedings SOURCE OF FUNDS: Departmental budgets (CA-1 for fiscal impact assessment) Agenda Hack-up May 22, 1984 Page Two RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of annexation. EXHIBITS: 1, service Plan 2. Map 3, Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 16, 1984, Charles S. Watkins r<- Senior Planner 0260s PLAN OF SERUC~EA ANNEX13D AREAS CITY OF DENTM TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that: a plan of service bo adopted by the governing body of a cite prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is coil te;rplating rrinexation of an area t:'hlch is bounded as Shown on a In0.p pi proj-'Ad annexation, sOIS, THEREFORF, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF TEE CITik* OF D'i.,NTON, TEXAS Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Taus Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: 1. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using; present personz:e., and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic sins, street markings, and other traffic control devices till be insta li:d as the need therefore is established bv a;)prc riate study and traffic standards, 13, fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effective date of annexation, C. Wat er (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, from existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of -111e City of Denton, Texas. D. Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected to server lines in -ccordance ,v: th article L of appendix A of the cane of the City of Denton, 'T'exas. r, Refuse Collection , (1) T1ie scjme rl'f;ul'11' i'L? 1 C:VI J- LCled t5'2th111 the C. annexed area vv it,hj.n 0116 ':'Cnth ii( 3. '_i;F? l ':ECri\' gate of annexation, Sez•vice Plan Annexed :'Areas Pnk;e two F. Streets (.1) rlllerfsf-:1C" 1laa;}rf:'nance of ,^t'reet s (]'epai,- of „!'tlol; ' CI}l;c1OS ,3112' C;~ ❑iit:ii..r'i fk: t-fi, o}','. ; will begin on thkr %.1fet;tiVt, ,'late OT annexat:+.a, (2) Routine maintenance on the carne basis as in t present cite, will begin in the annexed area. cn the effective date o annexation, (J) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, i118:;111a- tion cf storm drainage facilities, conszructicn of curbs and gutters, and oth---r such major iMIuro'.'er,ents, as t'hc need thf~,'efore is determin(-d by the kct'erning body, will be accomplished under t")e establis..:td. Policies of the city, G, Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now prc%-:.ded by the cSty (building, electrical plumbing, pas, housing, sanitation, etc,) Frill begin in the annexation. area on the effective date of annexation. 14 Plant ing and Zoning {1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation, City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area, t. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J. Recreation (1) Residents of tre annexed ark:a may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc.., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The sane standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program lnd facilities in the enlarged cite. K. Electric Distribution (1) ':lie c' t y reconunends the use of City of Denton for elec.;ric po~',er, .Service Plan Annexed Areas three ?,iiscellaneous (1) Street name signs ~rhere nec>c:ed ai ] 1 becJinste1 t i`, bate TI, Capital 11"Provement Program (CI)) The CIP of the Cite cel:sists o f a f i, e y ea r p l a l (\l1icy dated yearly, The Plan. is pricritized by >;t.ch lines as: (1Demand for services as ceaparod tc other areas based partly on density of population, magnituc of roblems comp tired to other areas, establi~::' technical standards and pr:,1'es sionaI studies, natural or technical restraints or opportunitLe_, (2) Impact on the balanced g:'owth policy of the cit (31 ) Impact on overall city economics, conside,,,~d , no fov CIPtplanningyin oar The annexed area will be upcoming CIP plan, which ` r the date of anncexation, ill this new CIP planning n yseaeat to the annexat.ion area will be j'adged accerdingl' established criteria as all other areas of tl:e cite, r i r h. I 4• lot a ~ a o Q q 1 0 4 r ~ 0 0 u r c tl d o u 0 0 6 a IEf 4 E 4 ri 0,00" 1 ~ ri y a ~ o a 60 3 p 9 4 ~ ~ O 2 eP 3 • • \ 0 a 1 P & V, Minutes May 16, 198+ M, consider making a recommendation on th9 proposed annexation of approximately 522.76 acres ct' land beginning south of Highway 380 (A-3), Mr. Watkins stated there are two separate develop- ments proposed within the area to be considered for (UNAPPROVED) annexation. There is a 280 acre tract of land which is located north of Mills Road and on both sides of Grissom Road where a 50 acre mobile home park is pro- posed along with the balance of the property being proposed for site built homes on lots of at least one acre in size. Another development is proposed on the east side of Grissom Road and this is a 130 acre tract of land which is proposed to be divided into 61000 square foot lots in all probabiility for owner occupied manufacturing housing. The developer of the 280 acre parcel of land has already begun some work with respect to development of the site built houses including installation of a water well and some water lines, It is anticipated that 550 units will be developed on the 130 acre site, that approximately 200 site built houses will be develop- ed within the 280 acre parcel along with an approx- imately 50 acre mobile home park, lie further added the roads servicing this area are coanty roads with only a sealcoat surface on Grissom Road and Mills Road simply consisting of a gravel road and the pro- posed land uses will generate substantial traffic on these roads; however, Planning and Community Development Department recommends continuation of annexation proceedings, Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approva' of the proposed annexation of approximately 522.76 acres of land beginning south of Highway 380 (A-3,,. Seconded by Ms. Cole and passed unanimously (5-0;. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ©&CfC-U~'_ SIJMMARY SHE_ _N MEETING DATE: June 5, 1964 SUJIJECP: Hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 4.013 acres of land beginning approximately 700 feet east of Sherman Drive. (A.-4 ) SUMMARY: This property is part of a proposed multiple use development along the east side of Sherman Drive, The property is vacarit at the present time but is proposed for single family residential devel- opment in conjunction with an overall 130 acre planned development. ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing (no other action is requirad). A1,11ERNATIVES: 1. Hold a public hearing 2. Discontinue annexation procoadings SOURCE OF FUNDS,. Departmental budgets RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Community Development recommen~.4s annexation. The Planning and Zoning commission will consider this it%:~m at their next regular meeting. EXHIBITS: 1. Service plan 2. Map Charles -.W atkins Senior Planner 0539g PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, T)CXAS Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service; I. Basic Service Plan A. Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, using present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effect-'-'e date of annexation; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be ins~alled as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards, B. Fire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be prov_ded on the effective date of annexation. C. Water (1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial .ise will be provided at city rates, from existing pity lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from ?iew lines as extended in accordance with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code the City of Denton, Texas. D, Sewer (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be conne~-Ted to sewer lines in accordance with article 4, of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas. E, Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service no,.-i pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effec:ive date of annexation. Service Plan Annexed Areas page two F, Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area ,-.n the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the go,,erning body, will be accomplished under the establisted policies of the city, G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the c.t.y (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation, H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning Jurisdiction of the +_it.y will extend to the annexed area on the effec-•,•e date of annexation, City planning will therE':fter encompass the annexed area.. 1. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the subs-an- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city, J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all ex.sTing recreational. facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city, K, Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power, J Service Plan Annexed Areas Page three L. Miscellaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately 6 months after the effective date of annexation. II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up- dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide- lines as, (1) Demand for services as compared to other areas based partly on density of population, magnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards and professional studies, and natural or technical restraints or opportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics, The annexed area will. be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the annexation area w<11 be judged accordingly to the same established criteria as all other areas of the city. It l ~ ~..V Ivti .w n 1NYlr s+lro$'j.G Y. .lr w ♦GI MH41^1fLV{~ ~ r 14~,< J 3~+ T~. arS+ t'd b n _ ...1na ~,3« ~ bf? i . . 1980 CENSUS TRACTS 1.4. 1.7 . IM.r~..... > w 2015.01 .k C 34~r/ 3 \ r 3 r 3,1 C4 1 .r : ~ 3 33133 313 4 Jy'~ p ~ n~ 204 . 0 2 ,41.111111 3, I 1111 111111111 I 4,4, „~P r. 4.j 1111.1 1 1 ljllll Lll lllNlll 1111 1 i H141 111144111 //~i _ 'r 1 I 1 Y 1 11111 111414 Y~~ ' ~ l~.11, \h.i~ 111111 .`C....__ ^rln llllrullnl Inllu111411un1 n111 : l1C ' r p 206.0 ~ ~ n1111111 In L- ~ ` i I.I rI r111111r1111111 Y'111111111f1111111111111111111111 ~ II °11.1 4. 1 ,°\111111Q 111 1 Illllllll ll~llllljll1111111• 1111(! 1111111111111 rllllllllllllllrl11111111111ry 1 • Irv i0n1 :1 Jr11111 ~1 0 [ 2 1 ~ Cw I!/1113 y1r1 r1 ~C~-~ 1111(11 11 , t 2 1 7. / 209 / i1r ~ • 4 I,ir ~ J ~ IIIn11111f111f 1111111111 ///~R 3 / . . T~v i 11q 111111{4 / ~ i i L . ` ! ..u11n11111nnlll rl rl lrlln nlll nln 1111. • / to lulnul ulu 1111: IL.. / .:Inns of t I 00. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. On the day of 1964, at 7t00 o'clocl; P. M. in the city council Chambers of the municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City council will hold a public nearing giving all interested persons the right to appear.' and oe heard on the proposed annexation by the city of Denton, Texas of the property described below, on rho day of 1964, at 1;00 o'clocx P.M, in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal 13uilainy or the Clty of Denton, Texas, the City CoanCil will hold a public nearing giving all interested persons the right to apouar and De nears on the proposed annexation by the city of Denton, Texas or the toilowing oescribud Prop(Irty, to-wit; Ali that certain tract or parcel of land that is situated in the v, E. Gallon Survey, Abstract NO. 452, DeOtOll County, Texas being a portion of a Certain (called) 45,25 acre tract deeded by J. 3. Haislar to Burton 'd, Blackwell on the 17th day of June, 1981 and recorded in Volume 1084, Page 194, Deed Records or Denton County, Texas, and oeing none fully described as follows; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said 45,25 acre tract. in the east right-of-way of F.M. Road 2164; :HENCE nertn 89012'10 east a distance of 440,00 foot to the point of oeginningi THENCE nortn 89°12'16' east a distance of )98.26 feet to a fencd cursor post; CHEtfCE soutn 00004'00' east a distance of 1317.3o feet to an iron pin; CHEN(-F. south 69011'53' .rest a distance or )83.90 (oot.: to a point! IHEtICi: north 00°3)'50' 'west a distance of 137?..10 reut to ccint of t;eyinniny and containing 31,135 acres o' lam(j. SEC':ION 11. The i'layor )f the Cit'y' of Denton, I9%as, is aereny toUr1Z=~ ana slrected to cause notice of soon pudic nearing to :)e A-5/PAGE ONE punliuneu once in a newspaper laving general circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in accordance -dish the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in Cull force and effect immediately tollowing its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLUR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 3Y: C A-5/PAUE TWO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CN CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THATt The City of Denton, Texas, ocoposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said city to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wits All that certain tract or parcel of land that is situated in the V. E. Gallor Survey, Austract No, 452, Denton County, Texas being a portion of a certain Icalled) 45,25 acre tract deeded oy J, B. Halsler to Burton W, Blackwell on the 17th day of June, 1981 and recorded in Volume 1084, Page 194, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and being more fully described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said 45.25 acre tract in the east right-of-way of F,M, Road 21641 THENCE north 89012116" east a distance of 440,00 feet to the point of beginning, THENCE north 89112'16' east a distance of 998,26 feet to a fence corner post, THENCE south 00004100' east a distance of 1377,30 feet to an iron pin! THENCE aoutn 89411153' west a distance of 933.90 feet to a point; THENCE north 00039'50' west a distance of 1377,30 feet to me point of beginning and containing 31,335 acres of land, A Puolic Hearing dill be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1984, at 7;00 o'clock P, M. in the Cityy Council Chambers of =he Mwiicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interestea in the above proposed annexation, At said time ano place all such persons shall have the right to appear and oe heard. Of all said clatters and things, all persons interestea in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice, A PuDlie Hearing 'dill be held by and uefore the City CddnCii of the City of Denton, Cexas, on the day of 1964, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the Clt-y Council Cnamuers of Municipal Building of the city of Denton, Texas, for all persons Interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time anJ place all such persons shall have the right to appear and ca heard, Of all said matters and things, all persons ititerestaa in the things and matters nerein nention,:d, will take notice. RICHARD 0. STEWAR':, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTB ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY NOTICE A-5/PAGE SOLO A•5 ANNEIATION SCHEDULE May 29, 1964 Submit agenda item May 3U, 1984 Submit agenda backup *June 5, 1984 City Council sets date, time, and place for public hearings June b, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle June 8, 1984 Publish notice June 11, 1984 Submit agenda item June 12, 1984 Submit agenda backup *June 19, 1984 City Council holds a public nearing June 20, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle June 220 1984 Publish notice June 2j, 1984 Submit agenda icem June '2b, 1984 Submit agenda backup *July 3, 1984 City Council holds public nearing July 16, 1984 Submit agenda item July 17, 1984 Submit agenda backup **July 'L4, 1984 City Council holds a special called meeting to institute annexa- tion proceedings July 25, 1984 Urdinance to Denton Record Chronicle July 27, 1984 Publish ordinance Aug G7, 1984 Submit agenda itema Aug Z8, 1984 Submit agenda backup *Sept 3, 1964 City Council takes final action *Indicates City Council actions **Indicates special called meeting of the City Council CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE OF MEETING: June S, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WOROING AS ITEM IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA) SUMPIARY: Parked vehicles along the west side of I.O.O.F. create problems for entering 333 1.0.0J. Cause can be attributed to the fact that the driveway to 333 I.O.O.F. is located at the termination of pavement on the north side of the street. FISCAL SUMMARY: Financial requirements for the project are approximately $120.0 which is available through the Transportation Engineering Budger ACTION REQUIRED: Elimination of Parking, ALTERNAT;VES: Allow parking as it exists today. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: `Taff and Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission recommend approval, EXHIBITS: L. letter from sir, Sid Smith and Tri-Source Builders. Minutes From Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission. 3. Ordinance ~(J'~''?9f h ' Z/)7 ,WV December 5, 1983 mr. Koorosh Olyai Traffic Engineering Department City of Denton Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 RE: 333 IOOF Street Denton, Texas Dear Sir: The private driveway for Ute captioned residence a-med by W. Sid Smith enters its frontage street at the end of the street and is nearly in line with the west curb of the street. Cars parking at curbside on the street too close to the drivaiay are blocking the drive or inhibiting access to it without danger of damklge to vehicles. The wtclersigned jx-:tit:-i.oners, repre.,,ent.utg 1001 of the adjacent property owners concerned, peLition the City of Denton to designate with appropriate signs and, or c.1tr.'b wwrkings a sufficienL• portion of the curbside in front of Uiis driveway to E1110W wiimpeded access to it. Space sufficient to acconynodate a fire truck is recommended. Thank you for your assistance in alievating wfiaL promises to be a continuing problein. Very truly yours, . W. Sid Stiidth 'I'r•iSottrcc tillers / By Steve 11e1 .sselil~orn 4J. 5. i ;7nitlt 2728 4delLorn, 4130 DaLlas, Tod xas 75219 Tr.i.Source L3uilde'rs 424 IMF Street DonLon, Im%as 7620.1 f ¢ Crc1ZOn's Traffic Safety Slipport COmmiElfJo» f•,,)ruary 6, 19814 ITF_ .F~' CONSID'rRATION~ Y 1'A~K[NCY-- RELATED F'ROl}ULPS OF 333 IQOF STRF:fT Kuorosh Olyai called attention to a letter from Mr, Sid Smith and Mr. Steva 14eissenborn regarding a parking restriction along I.O.O.F. Street, resulting from problems of access from the driveway at 333 1.0.0,F. Street. tie recommended approval of a "No Parking" restriction on the west side of I,O.Q,F. between llfghland and the end rF the concrete paving that deadends the street. A motion was matte by Commissioner Autrey and seconded by Commissioner Chamberlain. Commissioner Tompkins questioned whether parking should be restricted of the street, resulting in the previous motion's secov. the full length o being withdrawn. Commissioner Tompkins made n motion that parking he restricted from entry of the house to the deadend of. I.O.O.F. Commissioner Callian seconded and the motion carried unnnimously. I1•S;AI 115 CONSIDERAT[0N of LOADLNG ZONE RENEWALS Mr, Olyai presented Lhe CUUU1l1:3r.i0rrcrs with requests from Mrs. Sue Burt, 216 West Ook, that her loading zones at the above ndclress i,. renewed, Vice-Chairperson Chamberlain made a motion that Chu ]oadill;,; zones be renewed. Commissioner Cnlliar, serouded the motion. Mr. Olyn.i also presentcd the Commissi.onors with a request :.am t-Irs, Charles McNeill that the two loading zones located at 104 West be renewed. Vice-Chalrpersotil Chambel•la.tn made a motion and it was seconded by Com"111s;;icmer Calltatl that the zolles be renetaed surd it p,:. .sed unnlliruuis.ly. C7U. AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES 06 THE WEST SIDE OF 1,0.0.F. STREET BETWEEN 552 FEET NORTH OF HIGHLAN;. STREET AND THE END OF PAVEMENT) PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS AN DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ?HE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION 1. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no perscn shall park a vehicle at any time upon the following street i^ tae City of Denton to-wit: The west slue of I.J.O.F. Street between 552 feet uortn of Highlano street and the ena of pavement. SECTION II. Tne provisions of Section I prohibiting the parking ~i vehicles snail apply at all times to the street and part :t streets ,esignateu therein except when it is necessary to stop a venicle to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance a'itn the direction of a police officer or official traffi_ control device. SECTION 111, Any person adluugea guilty o!; parking a vehicle in violation: of r,h1s ordinance shall be guilty of a misoemeanor and punisne, oy.a fine not to exceeu Teo Huaoreu Dollars 1,4200.001. SECTION IV. that if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, .cause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or applicatiun there:; to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court competent 7urisaiction, such hoIdinL, Shall not aftect validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, nereby declares M1oulo nave enacted such remaininq portions despite any s.::- invalidity. PAGE 1 SECTION V. That this or310ance shall bac0ina erfectiVH fourteen ti Jays from the gate of ita passage, and the City Secretary r_ Hereby directed to cause the caption of thin ordinance t0 oe publisnen twice in the Denton ;record-I"nr0nrcle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within tan tIC i jays of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED to is the clay of 1964, RICHARD O. srEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS ATTEST: I CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRE".ARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. 'PAY'LOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, "PEXAS BY: PAGE 2 r ei~ Sxr. ;1 w CffY*f0RN"W, rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (8171566.8200 ' Office' of the City Manager MEMORANDUM 'MAY ,1"4 uATE: May 8, 1984 Tot U, Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM. Rick Svetila, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Service Center Traffic and Parking Problems Attached is a schematic of the area surrounding the Service Center, Several division Beads have indicated a problem with through traffic inside the Service Center area. There is also a need for more security for parking during the evening and early morning hours. We have looked at alternatives to provide more security and to reduce the amount of traffic. Currently, we lock all t►ie perimeter gates in the evenin and allow employees who work late night or early morning shifts to park on tine premises. We also discontinue traffic through the Service Center along the Texas Street route from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and all day on the weekends. This has discouraged much of the traffic and provided some safety, however, we are still experiencing large amounts of traffic moving through the complex during week days. As discussed with you previously, we would recommend the closing of Texas Street permanently. We can do this by closing the gate during all hours of the day and night at location "AWe can also provide more security by providing for a second gate and increasing the height of the fence along area 11Bn Please pass this information along to the Council so that they might consider it at the meeting on May 22, 1984. If you or the Council have further questions, I will be happy to try and answer thorn. R c bve ► a - Assistant City Manager .7d Attachment 1799M GAS / r e- J CRAW_FORO OARAGE SERVICE CENMR4 ~ _ ..___-_---._------------•------•--wood sT. ~ - , i RUDDELL ST. No. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING AND VACATING OF THAT 1 POR IRON OF TEXAS STREET WINNING 125' BAST OF, ROSE STREET AND ENDING 1701 WEST OF WOOD STREET; PROVIDING fOR THE REVERSION OF THE FEE TO SAID PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. f WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after due investigation and consideration, has determined that the best interest and welfare of the public will be served by vacating and closing that portion of Texas Street hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, that portion of Texas Street hereinafter described is wholly adjoined by property owned and used by the City of Denton for municipal purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. That the following described portion of Texas Street is hereby closed and permanently vacated as a public street and right-of-way of any kind or character foreveri That portion of Texas Street btginning 125' east' of Rose street and ending 170' west of Wood Street, City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II, That the ownership of the fee of that portion of Texas Street closed and vacated herein shall revert to the adjacent property owner, the City of Denton, as provided by law. SECTION III. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this ordinance to be filed with the Office of Doed Records for the County of Denton, Taxes. SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. RICKARD U. SLEWWT, "KAYUK CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL F'ORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY ^F DENTON, TEXAS BY: June 5 1984 CITY CUUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Consider Amendment Of Ordinance For Street Lig0t Pro-Rate Charges. SUMMARY: 'rho costs and types of street li,gnts have changed due to conversion to fiberglass poles, requiring developers to install conduit, and increased slightly for existing and new wood pole types due to inflation. 'these changes require an updating of existing street light costs to developers. FISCAL SUMMARY: The costs are paid for by developers for lights installed by the City under the pro-rata ordinance. Future operation and maintenance costs are paid by the general government through the rate charges for energy consumption. "rne costs are as follows for sodium vapor lights: 12/83 Cost Current Cost IUUW Fiberglass Pole-Uwner conduit O.OU b60 iUUW'Fiberglass Pole-City conduit O.OU 810 100W New Wood Pole 48b,65 490 IUUW Existing Wood Pole 163,30 1180 IUUW Metal Pole $846.43 U 25UW Fiberglass Pole-Owner conduit U.UU $900 25UW Fiberglass Pole-City conduit U.UU $10045 25UW Metal Pole (AB) $1 197.63 U 25UW New Wood Pole 4568.74 585 25UW Existing Wood Pole $244.39 1275 ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the average current costs for use in charging developers for street light installations. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of May 23, 1984, recommended to the Council that the proposed ordinance revision be approved. Re ards R, E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Proposed Ordinance Revision 11 Minutes PUB Meeting of 5/23/84 :3UU1U:3 i. . . 1 NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 25 OM THE CODE Ole ORDINANCES OF THE, CITY OF DENTON MU►S, TO PROVIDE MR REVISED COST FOR I STREET LIGHTING SER41CES REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH{ AND DECLARING ;.1 EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HERESY ORDAINSI SECTION I._ That Section 25-24(b) of Article Ii of Chapter 25, "Street Lighting Services", is hereby amended to read as followsi (b) The owner shall provide satisfactory easements for the construction and maintenance of the faoilities to be installed and pay for each street light to be installed. Tha City of Denton will invoice the owner and the owner shall pay the invoiced amount prior to the construction of the facilities, The cost to be paid by the owner for street lighting services shall be as follower Sodium Vapor Lights w Sise Polo cost 100W Fiberglass Polo-Owner Conduit 660.00 100W Fiberglass Pole-City Conduit 810.00 100W New Wood Polo 490.00 100W Existing Wood Pule 180.00 25OW Fiberglass Pole-Owner Conduit 900.00 25OW Fiberglass Pole-City Conduit 1,045.00 25OW Now Wood Pole 585.QU 250W Existing Wood Pole 275.u00 SECTION II. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict. SECTION.III. This ordinance shall become effective immediately after its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. K1(jHARV 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE-ALLEN) CITY ECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM! C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PU$ Minutes, 5/23/64, con't: Page 3 Morrison concluded his presentation by reporting that the study recommended that Denton's Raw Water Pump Station be upgraded co a 31 MGD capacity, and that the Water Treatment Plant be upgraded to a 30 MGD capacity, Morrison further reported that the study recommended the construction of a Water Treatment Plant (Sometime around 1988) in the northwest quadrant of the City of Denton, Morrison further reported that a more extensive site study would be required to determine the exact location of the plant. The Board received the report and also requested that ttLe Staff review the report and bring the matter before the Board in as following meeting. No furtner action taken on this item; 4, CONSIDER jvMENUMSiNT OF ORDIN&NCE FOR STREET LIGHT PRO RATA owes made C ZA ter brier oa scuss on oy the or a motion that the hoard recommend the City Council approve the subject amendments for the ordinance pertaining to street light pro rata charges, Second by Boyd, five ayes, no noyes, motion carried, CONSIDER OPEKATIdG ?,"PORTS; Nelson presented the financial operating reports for the Electric, Water, and Wastewater Systems for the month ending April 1984. Oelson reported that the electric Department posted a $128,947 balance for the month of April and the Water/Wastewa.ter Fund posted a $28,712 deficit for the month of April, Nelson concluded by pointing out that the loss in the Water/Wastewater System was to be expected this time of year, for the greatest portion of revenues in this system is generated in the summer season, Brief discussion followed, after which the Board accepted tue operating report. No further action was taken at this time. 6. COOSIDER RE iUEST FROM RPDG, Ii~C 1 FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS AT EG AAAD SHILO CEASETERY (SOUTHEAST OF _ DEN'TON Hain reported that R G is requesting the extension of the existing 8" water line from I-35E along Page Road to their proposed development. Ham noted that RPDG is willing to provide the necessary pumping and writ well capacity and is further willing to construct a new force main for the 4,OOU ft, distance in order to serve the proposed development.. Discussion follooed during wnicri Board members observed that this propoSal diners from the Storer proj)0Sal (Itcrn i!l) in that ovt:rsi.zing is not at issue in this case, Herrin; made a motion that tide board recorn;rend tie City . Council ailprov<z tree subject I'eque~'t for water/sewer service providing all installation is to be at. tt,e dcvalrper`;, expense. Second by Boyd, `_our uyes, one riaye (Coomes), ijotion carried. 1 CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATES May 22, 1984 TOS G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development SUBJECTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FINAL APPLICATION we will be requesting the City Council to approve our final CDBG application to HUD on June 50 1984. A public hearing to receive citizen input was held on March 29, 1984, and those minutes are attached. Requests and comments made at this hearing and hearings for past CDBG applications were used to determine the projects that we would like to fund for this CDBG program year. The projects and their costs are included in the final application to HUD whioh is attached. A copy of the proposed statement to HUD was published in the Denton Record Chronicle on May 20, 1984. The City of Denton will receive $614,000 this year to be used for CDBG eligible activities. ff-144W f- e an U547a nv.Iw bi..i . r • r. ,f.', •x: `.4r ':p. tom.: . "ti, r T . , frr R£ 5 0 L U T 1 ,0 N WKEAEAs, the City of Denton, Texas, is concerned with the 4welopsent; of viable urban communities, including decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities; and WHERt-Le the City of Denton, has a special concern for persons of fow and moderate tocome; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton, as an entitlement City, has prepared through a citizen participation process, A program for utilizing its first year entitlement funds in the amount of $614,000; and WHEREAS a public hearing has been held in accordance with law; and WHEREAS, the Act regg4irss an application and appropriate certifications; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I, That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas Authorizes the City Manager to sign and submit to the Development of Housing and Urban Development a grant application and appropriate . assurances for entitlement funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. SECTION 11. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas authorizes the City Manager to handle all fiscal and administrative matters related to the application, the Housing Assistance Plan and the assurances required therefore. SECTION III, The City Secretary is hereby authorizod to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Development of Housing and Urban Development. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984, KTMQ Y6 , UYUK CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETAR APPROVED AS 1'0 LEGAL FORM: C. Jr TAYLOR, JR.; CITY ATTORNEY CLTY OF DENTON, TEXAS .................~.~..........n...n.,...n:n....r-«n........r..•...t..:nn..r+~-.i. ..T... ten-n..mw+-..fin FINAL STATRONT OF COMMITY DEVALOPKlSNT OBJZCTIVBS AND PROJBCTLD USE OF FUNDS The objective of the City of Denton's Community Development Block Grant Program is to support activities which are directed toward the specific objective of development of viable urban communities by providing docent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunity, principally for persons of low and moderate income, The City anticipates receiving approximately $614,000.00 for its 1984 program year. Proposed activities and objectives are as follows: 1. Housing Rehabilitation ;101,865 Rehabilitate substandard houses inhabited by low or moderate income persons living in the city, Qb eo ve: To bring existing housing stock into compliance with housing code and arrest deteriorating neighborhoods in the target area, 2. Redevelopment of Fred Moore Park $ 77,120 Substantial improvements to and the addition of new recreational facilities within the targeted area. Objective: To improve the quality of life and promote neighborhood stabilization in the targeted area. ~'igel t3t~te~ent PagA 2 3. &gaulpition $ 59,147 Acquisition by purchase, lease, donation or otherwise of real property (located in project area) for the purpose of demolition of substandard structures and/or conversion of nonresidential uses to residences for low and moderate income persons. Qbiective: To improve the quality of life in the targeted neighborhoods and provide decent and affordable housing. 4. Demolition $ 30,000 Demolish and remove substandard structures that contribute to the deterioration of neighborhoods. Objective: To arrest deterioration of targeted neighborhoods and eliminate major health hazards. 5. Ureet Improvement $200,000 Realignment of the intersection of Robertson/Wye/Jackson Streets, construction of curb and gutter on approximately 1200 feet of Robertson Street; and the construction of sidewalks in this area. Objective: To upgrade infrastructure; to improve the passage of traffic, and to improve pedestrian safety in a targeted neighborhood. 6. Street Improvement $ 23,700 j Paving improvements along a portion of East Prairie Street. I Objective: To upgrade substandard infrastructure in targeted areas as a part of the process to stabilize neighborhoods. Final Statement Pals Thrae 7. P1annina t 39,934 Data gathering, studies, analysis and preparation of plans for carrying out and evaluating programs$ Objectives, To provide a more accurate planning process in order to effectively deliver services. 8. Administration $ 824234 Program management, coordination, monitoring and evaluation associated with carrying out eligible grant activities. A total of approximately 85% of the funding listed above will be used to benefit low and moderate income persons. Any citizens or groups wishing to comment on the proposed Community Development Block Grant projects should contact the City of i Denton, Department of Planning and Community Development, 215 Texas 76201 or phone 566-8350. E. McKinney, Denton, 0486a Minutes Community Development Block Grant 1984 Public Hearing pleasant Grove Baptist Church March 29, 1984 Community Development Staff Present: Elizabeth Evans, Jeff Meyer, Julia Moore The meeting opened with Julia Moore, Community Development Coordinator, explaining that the City of Denton had become an entitlement city which means that it is eligible to receive approximately $614,000 in federal grant funds, Ms. Moore then explained the purpose of the public hearing and distributed a list of eligible activities and a map of the target area to those present, Each activity was explained and the target areas discussed, Ms. Moore then introduced .Elizabeth Evans, Community Development Coordinator, who discussed previous projects that had been funded with Community Development Block Grant money. Ms. Evans listed examples such as the McKinney street fire station, sidewalks along Rudde'.1 Street, construc- tion of the Robertson Street overpass, housing rehabilitation, demolition of substandard housing and street drainage. Ms. Evans then asked those attending f., or their su.;gestions on eligible activities. The following projects were sugoested: 1. Street improvements - specifically curb and gutter along Bonnie Brae 2, Code enforcement 3. Housing rehabilitation 4, A multi-purpose center 5. Some type of shelter for transients 6. Improvements for Fred Moore park 7. Expansion of the Senior Center B, Demolition of substandard housing 9. Redevelop Phoenix Park 10. Development of Woodrow park _eve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation Department, els o discussed a list of activities which he felt should be cnnsiderr.d for funding, Minutes of CDBG Public Hearing Page. 2 7'he staff then advised the ParticiPant F to c.ont.act them at the City of Denton if t.ht;y had any f.vrther suggestions or questions c o n C rnig she grant , ^'he meetir;g was a6 jot:rned at 4 ; 15 P.m. I 0 1,' ca R E S O L V .T 1 0 N yrHEREAS, by Resolution adopted March J, 1900, by the City Council of the City of DBntVn, Texas, the City of Denton auth- orised the creation of the City of Denton Industrial Development Authority to exercise the powers of such corporations organized pursuant to the Development Corporation Act of 1979, as amended (the 'Act•)l and WHEREAS, the Act together with the Rules for Issuing Industrial Development Bonds promulgated thereunder by the Texas Provide for the uses; ARU11384), commenrcial (the Economic Depco)ucts for commission and financing of WHEREAS, said Act and Rules provide certain procedures with respect to the establishment and designation of Eligible Blighted Areas within the City for the purposes of f1riallyngdprojects for economically commercial uses and alleviating areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; SECTION 1. That the areas outlined on the attached maps which a r a designated boundaries and are further descrined in ExhiDiti A the as ~la! purposeB i olfedtl e dActdesignated the are and B Blighted attached Areas for hereto being portions of the City. SECTION 11, That the City finds t'nat the areas designated herein 33 Eligible Biignted Areas contain a substantial number of undec employed people and substandard of deteriorating structures which impair or arrest the sound growth of the City and a:e areas that constitute an economic or social liability in their present condition or use, The information attached as tX,11bleas further supports the City's decision to designate referenced in Exhibits A and B as Eligible B1lghtad Areas, SECTION 1'I. That the City findn and represents to the Texas Eeonon Development Commission that :hs availaoility of tinancing i projects for commercial uses under the Act will contrioct= significantly to the alleviation 0t the Dligh ted con ditior z found to exist in the designated Eligible Blighted Areas SECTION IV. That the principal types of projects for commercial use: desired and authorized by the City to enhance itshredeVprojucr.: efforts in the eligible Blighted Areas ate allowed under the Act and as may be limited by more resCri0t:"e policies estaulished by the City Ot Denton 1naUatr:i. Development Authority. SECTION 11. That the City repreaents that it will :eViaw all pru;e.: descriptions for approval of bpecitic projects for commer.::s_ uses in order to detiarmine whether such projects are aonsistert PAGE 1 with the City's objectives for redevelopment of t h a Eligibly Blighted Areas, SECTION VI. That attached hereto as Exhibit D is a description <t proposed public iatprovemants to oo made in the Eligible Blighted Areas, the estimated commencement and approximate schedule for such public improvements, and the source of funds the City wili use for such purposes, all of which is based on the City's bes. estimates as of the dato of adoption of tnis reeolutl0n. SECTION VII. That tr,is Resolution shall take effect immediately upon ita adoption ado the Cit/ Secretary 1s hereby directed to transmit i certified copy of this Resolution to the Texas Economi_ Development Commission, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1994. RICHARD 0. STENART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: C. J. TAYLOR, JR, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 3Y: h PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A Blighted Area Boundary for Cnrls Bancroft Property Florth - Colllno Street East - Fort Worth Orivo West - cleveland Street South - North Boundary of the 510 apartments Property (formurly the Yucca Motel) See Attached Map PAGE 3 COLLINS I } Q ' TRACT NJ TRACT #13 1R C 133 TRACT #13 Q -v $I lea 1) zn 5 R X14 ~ TRACT y 1 D ~ ~ ~ TRACT #13 _ -10 - TRACT #135 AND I: c.c7 g lZ TRACT #12 208, 2 7S 1 5207. TRACT 1.111 TRA # .o s 1 } v TRACT 412 -1 Isa Q 314 F 2.1 0 "J 2 75, ; T _ CT o121-2 TRACT T 7 W 7. S.0 V TRACT #12 7.s M TRACT #127 & #145-7 17 9 8 7 ~ `IL 8 D 0 1+ O~ ~ nom. ~ 7 174 Fit ~ ,x EXHIBIT B Blighted Area Boundary fur John Adam. Property-Bluex 235 efest - Dallas Drive blorth - Beginning at a point 301 Net northwest of the intersection of Smith and Dallas Drives along a line 590 feet east, East - South 208 feet from the northeast boundary point to Smith Drive South - 385 feat east along Smith Drive from the intersection of Dallas Drive and Smith Street See Attached Map PAGE 4 M N K? b'LI I OSiI ,d ~O ~ H h 49'4V~ ~ N to a z 2 r' M > cr. Q ~~O Q \00 ~ 111 N ^ d I • ham., V N a a 1h 9'61 I I V q o k I r P M Q •g M M g N I •o N r 1 r I ~ "~~~/~Obr ~ `p •1~0 zz O nom. 'c i EXHIBIT C Blighted Area Designation StatistiCs Ne1911bo11100d Blighted Areas item C 0elt boyhood 22 Intersection of Median Family Cleveland & Collins income (Bancroft Property) $200724 $11,i93 Percant of Families Below Poverty 7~ 12,11 19 Intersection of Median Family Smith 5 Dallas Drive Income $20,724 $10,638 (Adams Property) Percent of F'amillas Below Poverty 79 24,1% Median owner household Value $49,000 $19,400 Median Rent $ 205 $ 95 r PAGE 5 EXHIBIT D Capital Improvement Plan - Public Works Improvements Planned in Blighted Areas Area Intersection of Cleveland 6 Collins (Bancroft Propertyl No Public Improvements Planned Intersection of Smith 5 Dallas Drive {Adam[ Property) No Public Improvements Planned PAGE 6 r June 1964 C1-1'Y COUNUIL AGENDA 1`1'1;M SUBJECT: Consider Request from RWGP incorporatod for Water and Sewer service outside City Limits at Page Road and Shilo Gemetary (Southeast of Denton). SUMMARY: The RWGP Inc. are developers proposin~ the development of bb.5 acres of land in Denton s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) (see attaciied Exhibit 11) proposed land use is for manufactured homes, and they ace requesting that the City of Denton allow Lhem to be served with Uentotl water and ;sanitary sewer service outside the City limits. KWUP inc., proposes to extend the existing S" water line from 1-:35K along Page Road to this development. T ney are requesting a pro-rata agreement for any off-site portion of this water line, KWGP Inc,, also proposes to Lie in to the Corinth lit: station with a gravity line, The Corinth Litt station is located adjacent; to tnis development. 't'hey are willing to provide any increased pumping and wet well capacity fit order to handle the sanitary sewer loading for this development. Approximately 120,UOU galions per day of sewage would be eeneraLed and 150,000 gallons per day oL water would be used. 'T'ile Utility Department staff has analyzed the above request and sees no problem with the extension of the 6" water line from 1-35K along Page Koad to the development. 't'here is a problem, riowever, with the sanitary sewer tte on at tide Corinth lift station. fife present capacity u. Llie Gorintil lift station is approximately 90% full. Tn_, size of t11i8 riew development would exceed the capacity of this station, as well as the capacity of the force ma; from Lie LUriLlt[l lift station to the gravity line locate adjacent to 1-35E approximately 4,UUO feet away from the Corinth lift station, Since Liie Corinth liIL staL'ion and force main were constructed primarily 1017 the City of Corintn, and tnis development lies outside of the City u1 Corinth ETJ a::d inside tiie Uity of Denton E'1'J, it is the UtiLit Department's opinion tnat, in addition to increasing pumping capacity and wet well capacity of Lhe GorinL'tt lift. station, the developer would also be required to construe a new force main for the 4,000 foot distance in order .o serve his particular development. 3001'J: 4 FISCAL SUMMAM: All installations to be at developer expense, ALTERNATIVES: i. Approve request for water and sewer service contingent upon the construction of complete and adequate facilities to handle the water and Bawer service to this development as per city ordinance 1163-7U. 2. Deny the request and allow the developer to use septic tanks or package wastewater treatment system and install tlis own well. ACTION KEgUiRED: f City Gouncil approval or disapproval of Subject request for water/sewer service outside of Denton 's city limits, RECUMMENDATiON The Public Utilities hoard, at their meetinb7 of May 23i 1984, recommended to the City Council approval of the RWGP inc., request for such water/sewer service outside Denton';; city limits, provided all plans and Bpecifications are submitted to the City for review, a pro- rata agreement is executed for any oversizing ou off-site cater lines, and all instailatiotis are dolle according to UiL'y of Denton specifications and ordinances, In addition, all force main and water line improvements must ue complete and adequate to serve ttlkt? proposed development. Respectfully, r R. K. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT i Letter of Request from Burke Eng. 9/7/84 11 Location Map 11i Minutes PUB 9/4.5/64 :5uulu,, '1 ~zau:n}##IIfTlsLOAD BURKE ENGINEERING BRIAN BURM P.L CONSULTING CIVIL INOINISR 7 May 1984 Sr, Dave Ham Water and Wastewater Department City of Denton, Texas Re; Rollingwood Estates Dear Drivel I am writing on behalf of RWGP,Tnc., the owner and developer of the referenced project. It comprises approximately 66.5 acres of land in Denton's ETJ (see the enclosed map). The proposed land use is a manufactured home PD sub6ivision. I am requesting to be placed on the Denton Public Utility Board agenda because RWGP, Inc, hereby requests that the tract be served with City of Denton water and sanitary sewer, The method proposed for providing water service to the tract would be for 40P, Inc, to extend the existing 8" water line from the IH-35 E frontage d just North of Page Road eastward along Page Road to the tract. RW"IP l~uld install the 8" line under a pro-rat'a reimbursement basis from future developers. We propose to provide sanitary sewer service by direct connection tc t.`.e existing 10" gravity line flowing to the "Corinth" lift station, which is located on this property, Any costs for increasing pump and/or wet we., capacity in order to handle the additional sewage load would be assume` by RWGP Inc. I will work directly with your office to evaluate the necessary modifications. The estimated daily water requirement at full occupancy is approximately 150,000 gallons, and the sanitary sewage load would be about 120,000 allons per day (annual average). We propose individual meters for each conna.tiun but are open to direction by the Utility Board. RWGP currently anticipates that it will request the City of Denton to Annex the property in the very near future, and well bofore actual construcrl4on. Please contact me if you need additional information regarding this r-:.uest, Respectfully, Burke, P,E, van, 800 W. HICKORY ST. (817)5663714 OHNTOM, TEXAS 76201 1 A•~ul • V f„ I , ' I I _ - 1:1 I• I, I ill U ` I I I 1~ N, fV4 ' ~ 1 1 1 I • I n ~J I I Ili II r - ~ coum R~ - v x , 1 ~ 1 } rw~r~e if 1~1 r ~ ~ r aI r ~ rE to K ~ y ~3 x3s` o , ~ o ~Qti`~~`\+c ij ti > tY~\\ 0 : o ' o PUB Minutas, 5/ 3/254, cont. Page 3 iorriGoll concluded iris presentation uv reporting that the stuuv recommended tnat Denton's Raw ',Dater Putnp Station be uC'Srad('E1 CO a _)G I.1GD capacil:y and tnat i:nc !dater rreatme.1C Pi ant ue upgraded Co a 30 :ICED capacit.,. Morrison turtner rc', Oi'te(7 t;l6t file study recommended flee COn CYUCtiOil of a irtiter T;: eaCme 1)C 1) l; (Solnetil:le ii r: ,ItlE: 198LK) in t:Ie ilc."tBWeSL UL)adl:HWt Of the \.it\' of i)el'l[: 1t1, i1 ~rY1.S011 1urtne: 1 reported ttlat a more extensive site studv would be required to determine the exact location of the plant, Tile Board received the report. and also requr~sted tnat the Staff review the report and t)rint, the mattar before t:-,e board in a ioll.or'ing meeting, No furtner action tatcen on tniS item, a, V;~S1Ut:it r"u`IEM).IENE OF ORDI.:ANCE OR _STK_EET i,IGHT PRO K. T.y .tiiriUl Jt fitL"er brief G3SCUS51 0 i, Dthe Doi( C001 6 e motion that LIle hoard recommend the City Council al?pro e the subject amendments for trie ordinance pertaining to street lig,lt pro rata cnarbes, Second b.; Boyd, five aver, no naves, motion carried, tIU1~SiUEit OP itA'i'1,DG RE PWi TS ; iDelson presented the financial operat:.ng reports for the Electric, LDater, and tDastewater S sceliis Lor' the toolltn e:lGing April IL't-4 Nelson • tilat tale L.iectric DepartitlE.nt posted a 41LO,uy! D a I a n c P i0r tae montfl or. .4prii and the. 1%'ater/h'aste\,'ater 'Fund pOSL:'r. r. $/iL deflclt for the mor,til of April, Nelson conc:uaec b\, poiilIing out that the loss in the tiiater/`iDaStewa:.er Svstem was to De. expected tti iS tLme of )'f'ar, fOr tie `reatest pOrCi on of rC~'etl Lt us in L'nis S\'S tau is 1g•enerated in tile Summer Season. brief discussion lollowed, after wilictl the board accepted the operatinb report. No furtner action was taken at tnis time, CONSIDER R1 iUES1' FROM r:Pi)Ga_ CDC. Fu?, WATER AND S'~i;EkC S RV'iCi OUTSIDE CITY i,11~1I ; S i{T PAGr, Ai\D SN1! . SOLITHEA;;T OF DLNTO1)'} fia;n ~reporteo+ that Rvoc. is requesting tr(e extension of tti e existing S" water line from I-•33E along Page Road to tneir proposed development. Hem noted that RPUG is willing to provide (:lie necessery and I,et well capacity anc! 15 furtler wl.ilillb to Const-uct c new force main for the 4,000 it. dist.~ince in order to serve the proposed development. D CU8S1Jtl I:)l.lUr~tCl GLi'_, .11Cfi 150c:.C; CS t`S vet' tint tn_s ~rrc~c:s.:l C Jir~==s i r t:. s~ L it L it a t 0 Vu r: 1. 21 J.. . l~ l J C i L C f. l _ l 1 U, r is 1 i I 'c i l .1 Uil(, 1 Li+ :OV CtlL' J C-. _t .'t' kr.. Lt .o•. Li11n0 ( ~ltJbe, ~~CO+i 1 ( , .u i::flL 11111 C:!1 lf'C , r June 6, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IT51 SUBJECT; Report on Electric Rate Demand Charges, SUM%kRY ; The City Council has requested a report on revenues being received from the demand charge. Subject report is attached herewith. Res'pectfu ly,, R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL June 5, 1984 REVENUES GENERATED FROM ELECTRIC RATE DEMAND CHARGES i, Demand Revenue Summary; When Gilbert Associates designed the electric rates, the identified annual fixed costs allocated to commercial customers was to be $4,180,769 which would have resulted in a demand charge of X7.46 per kilowatt vs the $5.10 per kilowatt rate set if all fixed cost had been allocated to the demand charge, However, only approximate- ly 70%, or $2,857,408 was allocated to the demand charge leaving $1,323,361 to be included in the energy charge of 5.1¢ per KIVH. Gilbert estimated that of the $11,908,336 estimated to be received from commercial customers, 240 or $2,857,408 would come from demand billing based on 560,276 KW of demand KIV. Recent estimates indicate that actual KW demand billing for commercial customers will be 655,200 KIV for 1983-84 with revenues of $3,341,520 from the demand charge. However, total commercial customer billings are estimated to be $14,393,000 for 1983-84, making the demand revenue equal to 23,2% of total revenue which is very close to the 240 originally estimated. The increased demand of 17; or approximately 8,000 KIV is believed to be a result of an increase in commercial accounts and a general increased demand by many businesses and industry, II, Rate Comparison; The City of Denton's demand charge is $5.101KIV for all KW and is the same for small or large commercial customers. In comparison, other utilities, such as Texas Power and Light, have a small custo- mer (GS) and a large customer (LP-20) rate. The GS rate allows the first 4 KW demand at no charge and charges essentially $6.40 or $3.32 or $4.80/KIV thereafter. Texas Power and ',ac: schedule does not show this as an actual demand charge, but rather adds 100 KIVH per each KW (over the first 4 KW) to the 6.4~ per KWH bracket of their energy charge), therefore resulting in a $6.40/KIV demand charge if the KIVH use does not exceed 300 KIVH per month, $3.32/KIV if the use is between 300 KIVH and 2800 KIVH per month, and $4.90/KW if the use is greater than 2800 KIVH per month. Texas Power and Light has a large General Service LP-20 rate which charges $145 as the facility and demand charge for the first 20 KW which results in approximately $7.001KIV. Texas Power and Light's LP-20 demand charge formula is similar to the General Service energy block expander rate for demand arove 20 KW, The demand rate is $6,21/KW if energy usage is less than 50,000 KIM per month and 4S,60/KW if energy usage is greater than $0,000 KWH, III, Annual Billing Comparison; Exhibit I is a comparison between Canton's rates and other utilities in the State and includes residential, commercial ind large primary customers, The state-wide survey was conducte,., by the City of Austin, and Denton's figures were calculated the Denton Utility Staff, These comparisons tend to indicate that Denton's rates are quite competi.ve in the small and mid range of commercial accounts. Selected comparisons for annual billings for the past year are; Denton TP6L DP6L ,s, and Residential 1000 KM HO S 851,18 f 826.32 $ 875.76 f 855.21 Small office 6KW Omd, 170OKWH/mo S 1,548,32 f 1,•185,84 S 1,547,16 S 584.72 Small Bus. 20KW 11md,7000 KWH/mo S S, 267, 16 S 5,42a,20 S 5,535.28 S 80 Small Otis, 30KW Dmd,12,000Kw11/mo S 8,748.56 S 8,610.24 ! 9,109,32 S 12 Mod. Bus i00KW dmd,401000 KWW/mo S 28,361,99 ( 27,782.40 S 26,769,00 5 590,56 Industry 600 KW dmd,200,000KW11/ month 1 159,035.91 S 130,128,00 S 136,191,00 3 7 162,80 Lg. Industry 7,000KW, 3,500,000 KWH/mo $2,613,958,92 $1,901,943.60 51,,919,•122,00 52,!1',221,00 ELECTRIC BILLINGS SELECTED USAGES FAT rr I 3I-nor-B4 Y R1 (RESIDENTIAL) MONTH FACILITY ENERGY 0.50 83-102 WIN 81-11SUM 81-11 12,50 $0,055 $0,0435 $0,0465 KIN KWH KWH KWH KWH KWH KIN CURRENT 100 230 500 750 1000 2000 3000 ECA -w--- --M- ---w --w- M-w M-M •M-- w-YMVs OC70869 8.90 18.51 34,52 MIA NIA MIA NIA 1.75395 NOVEMBER 10.87 18.92 32.34 45.76 59.18 112.86 166.54 (0,131881 DECEMBER 10.77 11.68 31.85 45.03 56.20 110,9! 163.61 (0.22968) JANUARY 11.16 19.64 33.79 47.93 62,07 118.65 175.22 0.15741 FEBRUARY 12.74 23,60 41.70 59,80 77.90 15040 222.70 1.73996 MARCH 12.10 22.00 38.50 54,99 71.49 137.48 203.47 1,09909 APRIL 11.12 19.35 33.60 47.64 61.69 117.88 174.07 0.11908 MAY 10.98 19.20 32.89 NIA N/A MIA MIA 0,02188) JUNE 8.71 18.02 33.54 N/A NIA NIA MIA I.558i9 JULY 8.25 16.89 31.27 NIA N/A NIA N/A 1.10409 AU8U5T 6.63 17.83 33.15 NIA NIA NIA NIA 1.48094 SEPTEMBER 9,37 19,67 36.84 NIA N/A NIA NIA 2.21870 TOTAL 123.60 232.49 413.99 MIA NIA NIA MIA ENERGY R1 (RESIDENTIAL) MONTH FACILITY 83-102 $6.50 UND 1000 OV 1000 WIN 81-11SUM 81-11 $4,50 $0,060 $0.055 $0.065 $0.0435 $0.0465 KOH KIN KW KOH KOH KWH KIN CURRENT 100 250 500 750 1000 2000 3000 ECA OCTOBER 10.60 19.76 35.02 50.28 65.54 126.58 187.62 1,75395 NOVEMBER 12.37 21.17 35.84 50.51 65.18 118.86 192,54 (0.13188) DECEMBER 12.27 20.93 35.35 49.78 64,20 126,91 189,61 (0,22968) JANUARY 12.66 21,89 37,29 52.68 68,07 134.65 201.22 0,15741 FEBRUARY 14,24 25.85 45.20 64.55 83.90 166.30 248.70 1.73996 MARCH 13.60 24.25 42.00 59,74 71,49 153.48 229.47 1.09909 APRIL 12.62 21.80 37.10 52.39 67.69 in. Be 200.07 0.11908 MAY 12.98 22.70 38,89 55.09 71.28 136.06 200.84 (0.02188) JUNE 14.56 26.65 46.79 66.94 87.08 167,66 248.25 1,55819 JULY 10.25 18.89 33.27 47.66 62.04 119.58 177.12 1.10409 AUGUST 10.63 19.83 35.15 50.48 65.81 127.12 185,43 1,48094 SEPTEMBER 11 .37 21.67 38,84 56.02 73.19 i41.87 210.56 2.21870 TOTAL 148,15 265.37 460,74 656.11 851.48 11662.96 21474.44 NIA--HOT APPLICABLE 6S (GENERAL SERVICE--COMNERClAL1 LP (PRIMARY SERVICE) 83.102 61-11 SUN 81-11 WIN 83.102 8i-11 SUM 81-11 WIN FACILITY $10.00 (MONTH 14,50 $4,50 $49,50 4b 46 INONiH OEMAND 15.10 IKN $2.10 $2.10 $4.80 1.8 1.8 /KM ENERGY 101051 /KNH $0,0415 $0,0385 $0,0480 $0.0415 $0.0385 /KNH XN KW KM KN KW KN KW 6 20 30 IN 250 KNH 71000 CURRENT MONTH KNH KNH Km KNH KNH 11100 11000 12,000 40,000 100,000 200,000 3,590`000 VA OCTOBER 112.37 438.18 739.97 ?,456.08 6033.45 12,333.90 208,784,25 1,75395 NOVEMBER 125.06 U8. 37 636.77 21027,85 51008.12 12,265.74 197,033.70 10.131881 DECEMBER 123.40 381.52 625.04 11988.73 41910.92 12,070.14 193,610.70 10.22968) JANUARY 129.98 408,62 671,49 2,143,56 51298.01 12,844.32 207,158.82 0.15741 FEBRUARY 156,88 $19,40 861,40 2,7i6,50 080,56 16,009.42 262,548,10 1.73996 MARCH 145.98 474.54 784.49 71520,24 61239.69 14,727,68 240,117.65 1109909 APRIL 129.32 405,94 666.69 21128.23 5,259.68 121761.66 205,817.30 0.11908 MAY 126.93 396.07 649.97 21071.85 51118.72 12,485.74 200,863.70 10,02188) JUNE 153,79 506.67 839,58 21703.68 6,698.79 15,645,88 256,186,15 1.55819 JULY 1002 414.29 697.99 21316.14 5,783.59 it 104.18 196,539.15 1.10409 AUSUST 112,83 440.67 743.21 21466.88 6,160.44 12,387.88 209,726,90 1.48094 SEPTEMBER 125.37 492,31 831.74 21761.98 61898.20 13,863.40 235,550.50 2-21870 TOTAL 11545,32 51267,16 81748.56 28,361.99 70,390.77 159,035,94 21613,958.92 4RANK1N8 II 13 11 10 ti NIA 4 4 a Aankinq as caepaired to thirteen (13) other Texas utilities based on the total annual billing at selected useage levels, One (1) is 0e highest annual cast and fourteen {14) is the lowest annual cost. tt NOT APPLICABLE I I till of 44110 111CI11C Vikill W" MY COMNIAISIW "Milk WVI(i • 60" . 1uluEa MN" 11"Oltf 6EMt111 if IU / 1Y N IY Y1UitY1CIEl 170 NY6 AW116 1111 ka MikId till 9 *6114 (1,311.31 13 NII33.N 1 1 MR111 IIIAl EINOM Ylw IWIl1R 11111.11114 mw 5 . MOWiV1kU, IfL.+ MAN 4111111({ 1,311.11 1 S11SO.i1 ! Mimi 1114 UKIkk MWff 111W1 IITN.N f 1,317.16 ? COMA CA 16111 Ifni till NKIC "IVIU w" 11615.31 1 S1NLw 1 MM AINION&, II VA s,63S.1! II Mwa No I Mot C irw I,SiT.l1 It I", till u fw ELICIA14 ca~ T,NI.w { 1,153.31 I to Nil, liW till M W&Aw I,SN.T7 !1 5,13610 I .J WAAM61 Mid 60 IIAIU 411klllf{ i1TEri.16 3 11311./1 U aim at, 1({Y MO4tI04 kIWIIMS 1 IAMf1 U.~ 1,161.11 3 6,13/.11 S MW(IIM, 1(UO 1U110CK IW41 I IIWi 11151.N 1 S,T51.N 1 i 1(IM ELICIAU SMICL U. 115M.T3 1 31511.00 ll fM1 "to, IfIA6 HIM Na ► IIWI U. 1,WS.11 13 5,111.10 l1 wall wu, sm 10111 tAIC6l61EONNS VA MY 11M fNIFI. COST M IIC uki U Im"lit IAI I111tIM11111 T w...w.Mw Ir....Mw.ww~.• wn+rw n r i w Y.~ w.rr w.... A i tilt 11 196111 Iticllic 1111111 111131E 111E WMMIWO 4}1111" "I", MIAMI 116IVU6 AW LINE MIAMI MU 4}1111! KIVIu • "IAN MI1MI 60VIti Lou MINI unto .............n "11) 1040 11111 1,44111 u!AEat10111 1214" us 6AMf111 ",V" IW "Wim 3","1 mm malls 315111"1 IMI 1WCIM till If AISIIII IU,4IM J 114,136.0 t IIIIIIIl.ll 11!,14,414." E AIMIi1,iElm N"VIUS Mlllt 11111116 MAW 111353.31 3 331102" 3 1IS11H.24 s 1,11A1011.M 3 MM1Wlus, U[W IMA411!31114/ 11111.U 1 21145." 1310144." 0 31213,14." J MlAll, film uNIIAl1111EI11.16101 111340.32 4 13411S.I3 4 01,1M.11 4 2143,011,14 4 two will, !tlm till MMEIt 61"lu IIAW (,1"." 1 31822}.41 6 144,431." I 213"j N." I 611 11101!1, IEW IAEEY NCI I ttwI C&OW to I.M. Ii 1 21474.40 ll 131,111.41 1 11141,422." it • 111111, JEW u lA" UU111t &111/1"0 116011." 3 311131." 1 213,343," 1 21mini'16 t • 4 (1611 film till w 411!40 11!11.11 It 2115".56 1 Is36711." is 211111224." 1 MAN, Ulm 6LL) i111E1 YIIU2U6 212 11313." l3 21146" If 13114,1." it 11511,30." 13 NAM", IIW 101161N MAIN I No cww III I,I".17 1 I1111s." A 151111.24 5 113514034.11 S 11111111111, K WA iW"tl I011A 11.1W1 11332.11 1 21,121.44 1 1311743." 1 214",131." 1 11MIAtl1 film 11116 IUCIAlt 61AVUi CWA11 121 1,113." 11 31101." I3 1211111." Is !4033,105.46 II fYf 11111, Iilm !1111 PWO 1 IIWI t11fA11 IN 61,11.24 12 11,112." 11 131,421." 11 1,44143." U 1111111 mu. KU1 Will CAMAIII)d Iii Ml ft Mi. 061 III W1191 41 clll f6#1Callsi iY 121 "If U,i %AI16 AllkmIf EW 16164 WIN n A T F C I T Y 4) F A u 9 T 1 11 "'118A4 RLVCTR I C I}F PA RT14F NT C114PARISO11 01+ IfiS111I;NTIAL RATES PAY, 1984 CIIRRI?NT Rix )M1 Awl CITY Ion.n ?Fn,n 5nn,n 76'i0,0 1Ono. n ?nnn,n .3nnn,n FUFI. COST FI)FI. G.OST «UTILITYr KNH KV41 K41 KHI 9 w K1141 KWI CFNTS/KOf CENT3,)o * U PASO, Tx, IA, 13 ?9,%14 5?,A9 75,'{? 9H,.17 189,74 ?H1, I I 3,43400 3,414110 HI. PASO RLECTRIC CO, HOUSTON TX, 11,?5 23,'in 4n,5H 57, AA 92, 16 17H,46 ?64,75 34AIn5n 3,81Lit, O HOUSfoN LIGHT d 134MR HEA11WINT, TX. 11,42 ?4,111 41,Fin A7, 79 al '7H 157,74 ?33,7n 1,99Ann 1, Mum) GULF STATES HTILITIRS CO, I)ALI.AS TX, 13,,17 ?4,44 4?,H7 611,11 79,74 153,47 ??7121 ? ,70350 7165.SNi3 11A1.~AS PONF.R A LIGHT CORPUS CHRISTI, TX', 12"79 23,35 40',94 5n,53 76, 1? 146,50 716,87 4, 14??R 4, 14 7;214 CEIMIAL P1)NFR A LIGHT LUHHOCK, TX , 11 ,67 ?.2 ,29 391,96 571,65 75, 3? 146,05 ? 16, 77 3, 08?40 3, 0021,40 LUHHOCK PONFR A 1.108T ROUND RUCK, TX , 12 ,56 ?2 ,76 .19',74 56'03 73,71 141 064 ?n9,58 2,703.50 2, 3tl .1!.1.10 TFXAS P11NFR A LIGHT FT', W)RT11, M. 1.1',64 ?3,61 40',7? 56,83 73',44 139',87 206.31 70350 2,760,75 TEXAS FLF.CTRIC SF.RVICF CO. BR IIMNfiViI.LF., TY, 10,61 ?2,23 ,M',?7 56',31 73'115 141 ;52 ?091,69 206700 1,61x,17 HRONNSVILLE Pt1HLIC UTILITY DO. GARLAND, TV-, 10.91 ?1',12 14 '.A4 55',96 7.3'.27 142,54 ?111,82 4',0772 0 4,582'10 CITY OF OARI.AND DENTON$ TX% 10',98 19.?0 12',1)9 55,09 71 1136',06 2001,84• -0'4021,48 0,d92(06 CITY OF DFUTnN SAN ANTONIO, TX-, 10,05 PO 'P5 37"26 54',?A 71'.?7 139',29 2071,31 0,20200 0,06U;33 CITY POHLIC SERVICE HOARD HRYAN, TX. 10,76 ?3,73 41%.16 57,04 701,73 1251.47 180'.2( 4',06900 4.6151113 ARYAN UTILITIES *AUSTIN, TX, 9,97 16,15 26,46 4H,?7 70,07 157,?7 ?491,61 3•,9H0nn 3,911+(,7 CITY OF AUSTIN (A.F.) 11URAL 12, 1?. w)'fiA 313,6;9 48,6? 62.66 11A,H3 174',99 3',26940 3.5J&;32 HLIIFHONNET ELECTRIC C1I-OP NOTE I RANKED ON THE BASIS OF IOnn KNH CON91MPTION + 910141FIF.S A CHAN01: IN DIV RATE 9TWICT01IF (IF TIIF UTILITY 1XIR1110 THF. AHOVF MONTH, ATTACI1MUT 1 r O NR rA1'UA9IIT1'IMNF N T AtlI h% Ai P I. It 00 I TTRY 1 ~ ANNOAL A1181filiNTIAL 1111.1. 4.II0PARIIilltl IISItin MAY, 1904 FURL. COSTS MAJOR CITY UTILITY 1 A11011 t. 11114. / ANNUAI, HILL 500 KWIIMO', 1000 KWI/1HI'1 -M-,.----Y......ww-..M A-o.,---.., ♦w-V--V-..,--.' EL PASO, TX, FL PASII ELECTRIC CO, A3?. ,?0 1100',44 HOUSTON, TK, 110115TON LIGHT A PIIWFR 06,97 1001.40 CARPUS CHRISTI, TX',CENTRAL PoWR d LIGHT 491',20 913,44 HFAOMONT, TX, GULF RTATFS UTILITIFS CO, 492,06 91?1I? LIIIl1M)CK, TX . 1.11141WK PoWR d I.I OIfT 479.52 903 ,84 FT, WORTH, TX. TEXAS FLFCTRIC SFRVICF CO. 4H?, M HHI120 OROWNSVILLE, TX', HROMSVILL.E PIMLIC HTILITY HII471',?4 680."0 DALLAS, TX. nAl.I.AS POOR A 1.10111' 514,44 075, 76 SAN ANTONIO, TY', CITY PO81.IC SEkVICF HOARH 447,1? 071,24 OARLANII, TX, CITY (IF OARLAND 441,69 0F5,?4 HRYAN, TX'. BRYAN UTILITIES 5?O.v 043.06 ROUND RICK, TX, TEXAS POWER A LIMT 44H,619 H76,32 QENTON, TX, CITY OF D "PA i94,6A_ H2 5,31% AUSTIN, TX, CITY Of AUSTIN 4M,F,1 32 7061.70 RURAL OLUUHONNIT ELECTRIC CO-OP 415, OA 751,9? NOTE i RANKER ON THE HASIS OF 1000 KWil CONSUMPTION t SIONIFIFS A CHANOF IN TIFF. RATF. STRIICTIIRE (IF THE UTILITY DOMINO TIIF AH11VF NONTII. CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMI G, Chris Hartung, City Manager DATE$ May 31, 1984 SUBJECTi Status of Negotiations between the City of Denton, Denton County and Flow Hospital The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize theJrecentand negotiations between the City Manager, the act and the Administrator of Flow Hospital concerning the imp the Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement which will be required of of the hospital beginning on June 14. During the period Manager time that these negotiations were undeayl theiity leas also been in contact with the city's financl advisors and hond counsel concerning methods for financing the remaining portions of the reimbursement. The City council needs to be aware that if the hospital June 14, Medicare/ fails to begin reimbursement prior to Medicaid will proceed to make reclucti.ons from subsequent payments due the hospital. The actual impact to the hospital will coo err~tilonsrofLltile hospital throughbthef balaincedof this .fscal year. In the event the hospital is put in that situa- fiscal p tion, the Hospital Administrator and the Hospital Board are taking a number of stops to minimize tiimpact of this cash shortfall. There are plans reductions and other with budgetary cutbacks, sonic of which are to be implemented of which the new fiscal year appropriate `through the balance of this , will be implemented a ass fiscal year. As a result of those measures, Jeff Hausler as assured me that tile, prospects for the hospital for fiscal 1984-85 are significantly improved. I have also discussed with the administrator the p he hospital of al complee review to insure that of the fees and charges made by t any opportunities for increased revenues are also investigated. It is my understanding that, in many cases, the charges for cervices at Flow Hospital are below the charges in other area private hospitals. Memo to council re Flow May 31, 1989 page Two As a result of the changes which are being implemented by the hospital administration and Board, Jeff Hauslor has assured me that Flow would be able to repay the Medicare/ Medicaid reimbursement over a reasonable payment period. Of course, that commitment takes into account the fact that the City and County have already agreed to contribute $250,000 toward the repayment. In considering a traditional loan arrangement through the hospital or the issuance of bonds for repayment of these costs, it was found that the lender would require the City and County to execute formal contracts with the hospital in- dicating that the city and the county are underwriting the terms of the financing. That presents a real problem for both the City and County, The obvious issue that this raises is that it would require the city and the county to formally adopt a method of funding for the hospital that could be included in such an agreement. Due to the recent memorandum submitted to the county by an Austin law firm concerning the payment for indigent care at Flow Hospital, my opinion is that it is not possible at this time for the city and the county to resolve the long term issue of the funding at the hospital. The question of indigen° care significantly impacts the hospital's long term financial status and should be resolved before any other arrangements between the city and the county are settled. It is unfortunate that in the discussions of the status of Flcv- Hospital the real issues have become somewhat clouded. The Council needs to keep in mind that there are two issues re- garding the funding of Flow Hospital: 1. The first issue is the city's obligation to underwrite to some extent the hospital as a result of our ownership interest. 2. The second issue relates to the obligation of the county government, irrespective of their ownership in the hospital, for the provision of indigent care for the citizens of Denton County. While it is certainly appropriate for the city to contribute to the operation of the hospital in those areas which relate to protecting our ownership interest in a major public facili:-,-, there is absolutely no logical argument for the citizens of the City of Denton to subsidize in any way the provision of social services to those residents of Denton County who happ,:~'. to reside outside of our city limits. Memo to council re Flow May 31, 1984 Page Three After much thought and consideration of the present situation the latest action of the County in seeking at the hospital, to shirk its basic obligation in support of the hospital, and in the interest of preserving the financial integrity of the hospital in the short run, I am therefore recommending to the City Council that the following steps be taken: 1. That the City Manager be authorized to negotiate a contract with Flow Hospital, independent of Denton County, which would provide for the ad- vance of funds from the city's General Fund reserves in the amount of 50% of the remaining Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement, to be repaid by the hospital. over a reasonable period o" I-ime. The understanding is that this contract woul.i be brought back to the City Council. at a future meeting for your formal approval and that the appropriate budget amendments would follow to accomplish this transfer. 2. That the City retain outside assistance in the review and analysis of the future needs in the City of Denton for a public hospital. This analysis would include a survey of the citizens and the medical community concerning their feelings about the present level of service at the hospital and the long range requirements for such a facility in the city. 3. That the City Attorney be directed to advise the City Counc:.l concerning methods for seeking the resolution of the legal questions concerning the county's responsiuility to finance the care of indigents (paupers) in Denton County. I hope by these definitive steps the City Council will be assuring the citizens of this community and the employees and Board of Flow Hospital that the Council is indeed committed to maintaining the financial integrity of the hospital. I can only hope that the members of the Denton County Commissioners Court will do likewise. 1hr _1}artung ca attachment FIRST TEXAS MEDICAL IS DEVELOPING A HOSPITAL IN DENTON r i 1 i 0 ver the past several months, the Denton County news media have reported the hearing procedures of First Texas 'IvI edical's application to build a 50-bed replacement hospital in Denton. As a result of this hearing and the attention it has received, j o there have been many issues and questions raised about our organization and about 1 the delivery of health care in Denton Count: Because you are of special concern to First Texas Medical, we'd like to take this opportunity to explain our position and our objectives in this entire process. _.--Y--..__.. w.._.-rT.•.•_... ^i..-ww^wn".Ye'..wr_..w..~...__.-.___._. ..._...r n... 1 mvn (Ill.- llom)i tl, haw not lnvcstccl the fund.." First Texas a , 'Ica ldle ll' ncccs.Vn)' to mainlaill and upgradv the hosa Who \Ve Are and pital tts It' t should have heen. a t'e•sult VkAN' " ~~'~1]at We ISO Hospital Is, accurding to a texas Depart-+lent f Fictilth official; "below average r()r ;r t:ICilin• 1"r. %:ts \iedical is •111 1]l;q;utic:uiun of Ira its age" I HIN'Sici;tns M111 prat ule •1 r,a'10Ill mWdical Flak I II rspilai is in I u IkInr,n I II ,ct r ,ll I IrC ser icCs throtl,Ithnu( I )moon l'nunn Av to and Lilc rodc rclluirenlinls '1'11t° c On, had a pr'eu•nec in this Gmim slrlcC Ind V14)1,1Llills, Nlnct is nnl 141] tcrlvtl li'nr11 rta•sv dorm(; This tinge, WV W heen I , IIr1n1111t'd to rcyuircnlCnn clue' In It', AI-V I Iowever, netthet) 1) r(widt11,tttltulht\,I ill)tI\at k.,Ill' dIkalsinIcus (Ile Cit\' Ill It' the CI)utlt}' bus de1'el lIXNI an\'' \\'e %C heil•ICd IIIAV Illc'tht':Il 611C 011"L' long-range plans for rc•versin,o this shu;tuvn. accv,ssiblc hr iwi patients NNilh o,menwim 1;tst year, our`Concerii above the Flo4 hours;u nur lk nton, ft•cs,s1 ilk, mid Can( lltnll Situation prompled First Tetxas 1ledtc,tl to J Centers. submit a propomil to the City and County od VC "N,v It)I)kccl Ga' nC%s ~\at. I1I pwo% (k. Denton to huy Flow Hospital and conslruaO.1 setvlces ICss expensireli, such 'Is nutpati IM new hospital at no cost to the taspcweN, and surgutl~ and hunk heatih i,ut• scrrrecs. 1'ht' provide funds to provide for indigent law rcce11tly upc'nCd CanCCr Ir'C MIL.-M X1]10 In- Iwhich is, by law, (lie financial r(2splansihilin Cated at our I)(2nlon 1"olin' has hrnu,t;ht new it' the Counw) and woul'd have turned (henen WMAk.'es l0 1 )Onion COL1111V WhIL11 hcti,re tcenc hospital into :l Uxpaying entity urth'ataihthleIll [Xill'Is When Ihls prnlhlsal %%;ls rok-1 col iirsl Our prim;t1]' ohjt•cdtc in .111 nor (,!lint, liAxs \icdical pursuid usher nponm (0 1) rn- has heen to deliwr (Juulin' iar12 to (hC 110.10H) rtd12 fllUll'e hnspttJI C;ur l(1r nor I )Cnl 9) ,I V:I panenls for w1will scr provide clre in I Munn p,ui12n(s as ;1 V.NLII1. HFNI lcA,t, VVLIK.11 ;)ur. Cnun1\. dl&(Al The 0121](011 OSICI y)uluc 114).I,i1.,I .Intl pin Ceded ~%illt pkins (o reillaic ,Intl I.-g).111d First Texas Nfedical the t:ICII11l' hr 21 beds Wants to Replace The New Hospital A Hospital Will Provide In Denton The prnpnsed First Tc\,Is \tedic,li t co(rr \Y): are currently awaitittq apprnt;l Irnm the ilnspil•11. M)Mltt,ll ht L1];uCd,Idi.liCnt tulhe Texas Ilealth F;Icilities Commission III huild First'li.Xas \icdicl I;t•nler I)enlnn. tnk! ors First'ksas Mcklicai Center Ifospiral in I)entun rklC grner;Il mCdi(al sur,+;lctl .1116 )IN.tclriiul \C'12't'C :IppltCd to the Sta112 to build this ;n•hetl sr1 ices This ;Vl hcd hI I>I lial tt ill .1h Isn ,ride replacement hospital hecause \ke .11-12 Cow he mnelerll Otluiplilt•n( J111.1 IaclluiCI neces• cen ied about providing quality husptuil Caru s; u'c liu'(,lUalilt' Ir•uienl cane Ill 00)(011 fur Isle 1ORWe. li ,q prl.red. this h)spilal will 11111) the The piwsicimis at Hirst Texts \Ictlkal in HISS 'l'.\Js .MCLIKA health 1211'( Jcilcr. srs. Denton practice pfIllM1'ih' al Fiutc \IC11111r1,11 (12111 iu Ik:nlual 61](1111\ In funhcr rnh.l11re Hospital. 11) fact, 90 p9'CCIlt 1]l Ihcse ph)'si• patlenl tatc clan,' hospital carC has heen pi'oridC•d al 1.1m But, over the nears, we've seen Flow Hospital! deteriorate. The City and County which jointh' \Von't a New Hospital Flow memori:ll has Iteen placetl in 4IP vulncrablc position by not taking :u) aggy:3' Hurt Flow Memorial, slvc posture In an Increasingly t:N)mpctlllV V'hlch 15 Supported envlro rent. Flow cannot caxpect to Iv pro• (ccted 6,6m coml)etidon force \ln;tily, lit' Ilax Dollars? We"I'gotc klospital Ir•Is applied to (ilk- 5cue lu odd ,lhstclrical sl'Ivices in dirc.i C(0nmc. IiANCd ,.It pUl\ulaliUn .Ind taili/•ui1r11 pro- tai(0n will, I lu\v. lcirnins, the' iun,trumull (0I Firs! il~\us \ledi- ')>vu irate psychiatric' l;tcii,rtc, h;nc cal I:(_'itlcr 114 SI)WIl slit RI Id n. t atl\efs.•Ic,tITVL'1 Ipplic• Itit)IIs I)ettihtt.It W trc;Ilnte111 ,.'ntetx in FI„t\ IItoyaoi. Fir'I tnts I.a replaiVMCIIt h(,s• the I)cltlun arca I'Itese, It I, I, 1P,itI'i dirvolk pilot, M01 a inutile I1e\\ n(0spii;tl III Ik'nth,r1. 0)MI ate with 1:11 t s Itrugr;ntts Ur;rr Itealtlt IlNcnIN >1\ ui the pruI)(;I ;n hPds •Ir ilreatlt Lwv enHnlcs have seen I told in the t.••rlth t.11v 111 SCI\ Ice and t m lud he 1'11,.i lV\.ts .\I.'dll;tl, deliver\ system and ;Irc anelnp(1n>; r. 1 till it. 1'hi,n•ci,ttlu p;ntcnls, iu t pcn:rnt i,,low,memorinf an remain uFmt)icinsti' uccup;uu}, is ;III aiCCptahle otilii,rtItm laid tutlonOuis10'.dt)<,s,6~requlres action and an l a' t ;n•hed huspit;Il I'hc C to r.'nt IC\"cI of Investment in the future, not protet.Y70ri-from uhlizanm alou,q \\rth the nett sci~ir., pr(0 contlx^IItIpIy rldcd thrui~uh du•ranCCr tt'c;nincltl rc:nler;uul p,g\ulultun ~ru\\th In the I>enlun ur;t trill easih 101 itt hods tvahotn intl);ICIIn,g Flrttt' CU1111111t[11ellt IIL„I;It;lI To the Future !n I,IiI, p, q~ul;uiun ~;ru\rdt is a major I;u'~ firs! Zc\as \icdieal is runinutrtl IL ;,r„citiin~; tar IO he cI lsiclered in pI.11111 t?g 1,11, t I le are;t s clnalitq health rare f(W the pcupEc , I I iOWIll hc•1IthC;Irc.l>cntotl( unlcislhcfruutllrir'\1i't CouillIv. This means,Isuuut~ (I,,; hospital crr,rrrrt,e irNrrrh in the 1 nitctl.tirates fly In %M'iiesand Ntxt2.oI-tlu-:Ir( I;I:ihuc .Irc;Iwil' lints the replaccnlcnt luspir,ll i> i, mplctc`I nt able fur patients. We ills Ihvn,,: •rc. make It1>;". I'irsl li•xus \Icdicul cspcCts Ihc• Etcnl"t' evcl•\, cll(0rito h~uldfjt'sl ki•xas\L•.'1r;1!%:cnk•r Cento.I,h I;IVegnm111['( 0111_9;11 topitt'sici;at's avil ll i n iktI i in rCSpuoxC to the Cuuntr !;['birth / .-77 ~,Pr'fr W/14 '~[I/ !~P//ir 1O//N t'trm hs)illknO e Other factors r/r"W'i, Illele goad Barr Affecting they) J,,,//nrrPMetP//c,licdO1)cr.r/u,Ek•- ',btcr,n~tJ!.. Hospital Delivery Me'krrurIt?&41#1 fI~///hl'!~!//r~l /o7 l~t ~i(IrIK. Ot' Health Care it is interesting to note that the ntc)ney the ' •'"waei:eitr County Cuntrihutc,< u, Fluty is being paid by J ,frn1.Taar/., .lla/F.///<rrrtr~ die counW taxpayers as ;t whole. But, approyi. mately St) percent ortlic indigent patients who use Fkow I iospitaj Come from \villtin IheCjtyof I)emmn. Only approximately four I)erccnt qI the indikcnt ])abates CumC from thrysuuthern Communities in Denton County,, I f O 1~ (I / ~*V ~t~ ~ / ~ i ~ ~ I Cj 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ j I~ ~ ` ~ 1 ~ I 1 1 r r ~ D,a h V , b ~ ~L S~a.rrin Senn Ot?dpr'sc,, w . r., r o 'I d', it" v,10 11 nr~r~ 17771-, i J I;..~ 1 nd Y 1 r 1 1 n l t. r' lid °~y y ' , ; ~ ~t. ~'t • 35 ~z~✓rcQ, ~ ' l O .t' t •r ~c..~.~ C~" 1 ~ ~ _l..-~- i +nM i S r dwo 21 y ` 1 y, . .rte,; T 1 Y' ~ r r r ~ i WOOC'~~dW e~ far +Z ) n Rl- i i c~ Aue . .~,vGr:rte' * J UeC r A~ 1 t, , nd~o r' o44 Gj n al.&o r I~j 4e z ~ ww n L1t ~Cot 0 v ; {nk.lc r~uc , Ca ~I I M.. ~ d" dk .r~►'"~ , r ij... },.i• '.asp l ~Fi4. LIM 40 1l~ 4t t• ,n 1 l r r ~:%,~9N I7 >Ci 4")C Al ..J CLKI HCA-F OF U THIS IS TO CIPTIFY that the mlcrophnte9ropho appearing OR lhl$ I'llm-l;lle i►cnrin~ with CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET g~r~1g ~ on~i Cndlny with CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET are octurolo and complete roproductlono of the recordo of (.Company and i)opl,) CITY OF-DENTON CITY SECRETARY „oo dellvered In the rosulor couroo of buvlnooc ter pholoprophlnp, N Is furthor certInod that Ihf mlcr4phologrpphlc proceooeo wet* accornpllohool In a rnonnet and on Alm which motto wllh rojulrom,cnla of lhf Nolte *11 g1+ u of Standards Iw permanent mltrophologrop:ric copy, / -",y ; lnlcre • Rocords comp ILwe) Y(CMnOLOGY AY (h orwo r 1LgCi 61n L141t~Perlc &a State A(IInOIAM Y@-YAt 711)1(1