HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-07-1984
R
AGENDA
CITY ON DENTON CITY COUNCIL
August 7, 1984
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
August 7, 1984, at 5:30 p,m, in the C,tvil Defense Room of the
,Municlpal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m,
1. Receive a report from Dr. James Glass on the results
of the 1984 Denton Survey of Citizens,
2. Executive Session:
A. Legal Mutters Under iec. 2(e), Art. 6252-1"
V.A.T.S.
i
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-1'
V.A,T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art
. 62S2-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
August 7, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Special Called
Meeting of February 21, 1984; the Regular Meeting of
March 13, 1984; the Regular Meeting of March 20, 1984;
the Special Called Meeting of March 27, 1984; and the
Special Called Meeting of April 3, 1984.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of toe Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
• A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1, Bid # 9307 - Electric Distribution trans-
formers
2. Bid # 9308 - Disposal of PCB capacitors
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 70 1984
. Page Two
3, Bid # 9309 - Electric meters
4. Bid 0 9311 - Truck cab/chassis
5. Bid 0 9313 - Water meters
61 Purchase Order d 64152 to Saf-T-Mark Supply
Company, Inc, In the amount of $3,690.00
7, Purchase Order M 64197 to Group Graphics in
the amount of $3,597.00
8, Purchase Order k 64240 to J. S. Equipment
Company in the amount of $4,843,00
B. Plats, Replats and Site Plans;
1, Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Barister Addition, (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
2. Approval of the final replat of the Bellaire
Heights Addition, Phase 1, (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
• 3, Approval of the final replat of the Haywood
Jester Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
4. Approval of the final replat of the Teasley
Mall Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
S. Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Westgate Park Addition, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
6. Approval of the preliminary plat of the pit.
Calvary Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
7, Approval of the preliminary plat of the,
Southridge 11 Addition, (The Planning anIJ
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
86 approval of the site plan of Township II,
Phase II, (San Jacinto Shopping Center)
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
• recommends approval.)
9. Approval of the preliminary replat of
Township 110 Phase i1, (San Jacinto
Shopping C6nter) (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
City o£ Denton City Council Agenda
August 71 1984
Page Three
C, Final Payments;
1, Consider approval of final payment for 1983
drainage improvement pro ects (Bell-
Coronado, Paisley-Mulkey, and under Street).
0. Contracts and Agreements;
1, Consider approval of the maintenance
contract with TRBS Payroll Porsonnel
System. (The Data Processing Advi.s'!'.-y Board
recommends approval,)
2. Consider approval of the maintenance
contract of the AMS Financial System
package. (The Data Processing Advisory
$oard recommends approval,)
3. Consider authoriz',ng the City Manager to
execute an agreement with the City of
Farmers Branch extending the landfill use
contract,
3. Appearance by Mr, Carl Young requesting approval of a
request for the use of Fred Moore Park, with a waiver
of the fee and for a midnight curfew, for a Labor Day
celebration,
4, Public Hearings;
A. H-32. This is the petition of Keith Shelton
requesting historic landmark (H) zoning
designation at 621 Grove S.treet. The property is
more particularly described as lot 2 and the west
11 feet of lot 1, block 2, of the Woodland
Addition. (The Historic Landmark Commission and
the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
historic landmark (H) zoning for 621 Grove
Street.
B. S-180, This is the petition of W, D. Byrne,
representing the Y.M.C.A. of Metropolitan Dallas,
requesting a specific use permit on an 8.S9 acre
tract located at the northwest corner of Windsor
Drive and Riney Road, if approved, the specific
use permit would allow the development of a
Y.M.C. A. facility. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda ,
August 7, 1984
Page Four
• 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a
specific use pormit for a Y,H,C,A. Facility
on an 8.59 acre tract located at the
northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Riney
Road.
C. Z-1670. This is the petition of George D.
c~ 6gg'in requesting a change in zoning from the
single family (SF-7) classification to the two
family (2F) classification at the northeast
corner of Willowwood and Jacqueline Streets. The
property is more particularly described as lots
1-5 block E, and lots 8.12, block C, of the
Wylie H. Barnes Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends denial,)
D. Z-1675, This is the petition of Christopher
Bancroft requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development (PD) classification on a 19.39 acre
tract located on the south side of Highland Park
Road approximately 1,500 feet east of Bonnie Brae
Road, if approved, the planned development will
permit 71 lots for single family detached use
• (minimum lot size 7,000 square feet) and a two
acre tract reserved for a private school, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
E. Z-1676. This is the petition of Douglas
uWeenschel, representing Good Samaritan Village,
requesting an amendment of a planned development
(PD-21) at 2500 Hinkle Drive. The current PD
site plan permits the development of a senior
citizen retirement complex, health center
complex, adult day care center, nine (9) duplexes
and three (3) triplexes, The petitioner desires
to construct three (3) additional duplexes on the
site, (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving an
amendment of a planned development (PU-21)
at 2500 Hinkle Drive.
51 Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan anw- itig approximately 81,44 acres of land
• located on the south side of Paige Road and along
the west side of Swisher Road and north of the
MKT Railroad (A-1). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 7, 1984
Page Five
B, Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 470 acres of lama
beginning 35V feet south of and perpendicular to
the center line of U. S, Highway 380 (A•3), (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approvii.l. )
C, Consider adoption of an ordinance changing the
name of Ridgeway Drive to Lillian Miller
Parkway, (The Historic Landmark Commission and
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval,)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance allowing the
City Secretary to microfilm official City Records,
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing a
mandatory pet registration program for the City
of Denton,
6. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to sign utility permit forms and
utility joint use agreements from the Texas State
• Highway Department.
%
7. Consider approval of an agreement with Joe Belew for
participation in a now water line on his property fron
Windsor Drive along Locust Street to Hercules Lane.
(The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
8. Consider approval of a contract with Rady ana
Associates for temporary engineering plan review,
9. Consider utility revenue bond election.
10, Official Action on Executive Session Items;
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
11. New Business;
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C b R T I F I C A T 8
1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the Clty Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on they ''day of 1984 at ~i1sL o'clock
(a,m,) p,m,
1443C
AGENDA
CITY OF UENTON CI'T'Y COUNCIL,
August 7, 1984
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday
August 7, 1984, at 5;30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal building at which the following items will be
considered;
5;30 p.m.
1. Receive a report from Dr. James Glass on the results
of the 1984 Denton Survey of Citizens.
2. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T,S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
August 7, 1984) at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
.OU p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Special Called
Meeting of February 21, 1984; the Regular Meeting of
March 130 1984; the Regular Meeting of March 20, 1984;
the Special Called Meeting of March 27, 1984; and the
Special Called Meeting of April 3, 1984.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
1. Bid # 9307 - Electric Distribution trans-
formers
2. Bid 0 9308 - Disposal of PCB capacitors
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 7, 1984
Page Two
3. Did N 9309 - Electric meters
4, Bid 1 9312 - Truck cab/chassis
5. Did # 9313 - Water meters
6. Purchase Order Y 64152 to Saf-T-Mark Supply
Company, Inc. in the amount of $3,690,00
7. Purchase Order N 64197 to Group Graphics in
the amount of $3,597.00
8. Purchase Order N 64240 to J, S. Equipment
Company in the amount of $4,843,00
B. Plats, Replats and Site Plans;
1, Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Barister Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
2. Approval of the final replat of the Bellaire
Heights Addition, Phase 1. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
3. Approval of the final replat of the Haywood
Jester Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
4. Approval of the final replat of the Teasley
Mall Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
5. Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Westgate Park Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
6. Approval of the preliminary plat of the bit.
Calvary Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
7. Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Southridge II Addition, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
8. Approval of the site plan of Township II,
Phase 11. (San Jacinto Shopping Center)
('Cho Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
9. Approval of the preliminary replat of
Township II, Phase II. (San Jacinto
Shopping Center) (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 7, 1984
Page Three
C, Final Payments;
11 Consider approval of final payment for 1983
drainage improvement projects (Bell-
Coronado, Paisley-Mulkey, and Pander Street),
D. Contracts and Agreements;
1. Consider approval of the maintenance
contract with 'rRES Payroll Personnel
System. (The Data Processing Advisory Board
recommends approval.)
I
2, Consider approval of the maintenance
contract of the AMS Financial System
package, ('rise Data Processing Advisory
Board recommends approval.)
3. Consider authorizing the City Manager to
execute an agreement with the City of
Farmers Branch extending the landfill use
contract,
3. Appearance by Mr. Carl Young requesting approval of a
request for the use of Fred Moore Park, with a waiver
of the fee and for a midnight curfew, for a Labor Day
celebration.
d, Public Liearings;
A. H-32. This is the petition of Keith Shelton
requesting historic landmark (11) zoning
designation at 621 Grove Street. The property is
more particularly described as lot 2 and the west
11 feet of lot 10 block 2, of the Woodland
Addition, (The Historic Landmark Commission and
the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
historic landmark (H) zoning for 621 Grove
Street.
B. S-180. This is the petition of W. D, Byrne,
representing the Y. M. C. A. of Metropolitan Dallas,
requesting a specific use permit on an 8.59 acre
tract located at the northwest corner of Windsor
Drive and Riney Road, If approved, the specific
use permit would allow the development of a
Y. M. C. A. facility. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 7, 1984
Page Four
11 Adoption of an ordinance approving a
specific use permit for a Y.M,C,A, facility
on an 8.59 acre tract located at the
northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Riney
Road.
C. Z-1670. This is the petition of George D.
'Scog-Tn requesting a change in zoning from the
singgle family (SF-7) classification to the two
falnily (211) classification at the northeast
corner of Willowwood and Jacqueline Streets, The
property is more particularly described as lots
1-5 block B, and lots 8-12, block C, of the
Wylie H. Barnes Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends denial.)
D. Z-1675. This is the petition of Christopher
Bancroft requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development (PD) classification on a 19.39 acre
tract located on the south side of Highland Park
Road approximately 1,500 feet east of Bonnie Brae
Road, if approved, the planned development will
permit 71 lots for single family detached use
(minimum lot size 7,000 square feet) and a two
acre tract reserved for a private school. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
G, Z-1676. This is the petition of Douglas
uenschel, representing Good Samaritan Village,
requesting an amendment of a planned development
(PD-21) at 2500 Hinkle Drive. The current PD
site plan permits the development of a senior
citizen retirement complex, health center
complex, adult day care center, nine (9) duplexes
and three (3) triplexes. The petitioner desires
to construct three (3) additional duplexes on the
site, (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving an
amendment of a planned development (PD-21)
at 2500 Hinkle Drive,
5, Ordinances.
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing approximately 81,44 acres of land
located on the south side of Paige Road and along
the west side of Swisher Road and north of the
MKT Railroad (A-1). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 7, 1984
Page Five
B, Consider adoption of an ordinance and service
plart annexing approximately 470 acres of lased
beginning 35U feet south of and perpendicular to
the center line of U, S, Highway 380 (A-3). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance changing the
name of Ridgeway Drive to Lillian Miller
Parkway. (The Historic Landmark Commission and
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend
approval,)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance allowing the
City Secretary to microfilm official City Records.
6. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing a
mandatory pet registration program for the City
of Denton,
G, Resolutions;
A. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to sign utility permit forms and
utility joint use agreements from the ".?exas State
Highway Department,
7. Consider approval of an agreement with Joe Belew for
participation in a new water line on his property from
Windsor Drive along Locust Street to Hercules Lane.
(The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
8. Consider approval of a contract with Rady and
Associates for temporary engineering plan review.
9. Consider utility revenue bond elrction,
10, Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real listate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
li. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas,
C S R T i N 1 C A T B
1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the city Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1984 at o'clock
(a.m.) p.m.
14430
0MY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817 i566-8200
Office of the Cite Manager
CITY ON DUNTON
MEMORANDUM
1'(1; G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
DA'Z'E; August 2, 1984
SUBJECT; 1984 DENTON SURVEY
As you may be aware, the 1984 Denton Survey conducted by Dr,
James Glass of North Texas State University, has been
completed, The survey is attached for your consideration and
review. Dr, Glass employed the same methodology that was used
in past Denton citizen surveys. This allows for comparison
uver a six year period on many of the items,
Under the terms of our agreement, Dr, Glass was responsible for
project development and administration, including data analysis
and report preparation. He will present a report on his
research and findings and answer any questions that you may
have at the 5;30 p,m, work session on August 7, 1964,
etty e n, ss stant City Manager
ca
14460
1 11 1 1
1984 DENTON SURVEY
Prepared by;
James J. Glass
July 5, 1984
•1
1
I II ~ '
During the months of May and June 1984, a citizen survey was
designed and administered by James J, Glass, independent consultant
for the City of Denton. The 1984 citizen survey is the sixth successive
citizen survey conducted by Dr. Glass for the city, As a result of the
city council's and city staff's continuing commitment to the survey
concept, the opportunity to compare citizen evaluations and opinions
over time now exists. The report is divided into six major sections;
methodology, sample characteristics, city services, city administration,
and the appearance of Denton.
Methodology
A similar methodology to that used in past surveys was employed
for the 1984 project. Again, a systematic random sample was selected
as the most appropriate design for the study. To obtain a representa-
tive sample of all adult residents in the city, 370 completed interviews
were needed, The actual size of the sample drawn was inflated to 900
to take into account non-.working numbers, inappropriate numbers, re-
fusals, and no contacts. The sample was selected from the most recent
edition of the Denton telephone directory. After selection, the 900
numbers were then randomly divided among eight interviewers.
The interviewers were recruited and trained by the consultant,
Training consisted of three basic elements. First, interviewers were
informed about details of the survey. Such items as the reasons for
doing the survey, the concept of a random sample, and the administration
of the survey were discussed, Second, telephone interviewing method,
1
were presented, The interviewer's attitude, methods of conducting an
interview, interviewing problems, and standard procedures were covered,
finally, the questionnaire was discussed with the trainees, Each
question was examined and the specific instructions on the questionnaire
were explained, The interviewers were provided with written material
on the interviewing process, and they were instructed to conduct several
practice interviews. All of the interviewers had previous interviewing
experience so they were familiar with survey research and interviewing
techniques,
Each interviewer was assigned a quota of 50 completed interviews,
The interviewing was conducted over a period of 17 days from May 21
to June 6, 1984, Three hundred and seventy-four usable interviews were
obtained, The number of responses exceeds the target number, so the
survey population should be representative of Denton's adult population,
As with past surveys, the data are presented in tabular form with
some descriptive comments, but with little interpretation or evaluation,
The objective is to allow the staff and the council to judge the results
for themselves, The analysis of the data involved two steps, First, the
marginal percentages for each question were calculated. These are displayed
in the text as the percent responding "yes" or "no" or "excellent," "good,"
"fair," or "poor" to a question. Upon completion of the first step, each
question was then cross-tabulated with the following seven characteristics,
1. Length of residence
2. Owner renter status
3. Age
4. Education
1 3
i
S. Income
6. Ethnic group
7, Sex
The seven characteristics comprise a set of independent variables
that could add more detail to the responses of the residents, None of
the seven characteristics proved to be consistently useful in detailing
the results. However, each added detail to certain of the responses,
In each of the following sections, the 1984 survey results are
compared with past survey data when possible, Comparisons are made only
when the questions asked were the same or similar, When 1984 results
are presented alone, either the question was not asked previously or its
wording was altered significantly.
Sample Characteristics
Table 1 presents a summary of the descriptive characteristics of the
sample. Data on most of these characteristics were also gatnered in
previous surveys, As in the other surveys, Denton may be described
i
generally as a predominantly white, middle to upper-income, well-
educated community, The population is divided approximately equally
I
between those 35 years of age and younger and those who are 36 and older.
Additionally, there is a significant percentage (19,7) who are 61 and
older. A majority of respondents (55,8 percent) owned their own home.
That Denton is a stable community is evidenced by the fact that 17.5
percent of the sample stated they had lived in Denton for 6 to 10 years
and 38.4 percent stated they had lived in Denton for more than 10 years,
The high percentage of home ownership may be a contributing factor to
a
TABLE 1
Sample Characteristics
Characteristic Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Age
18-25 20.5 23,5 26.0 22.9 29.3 24,4
26-35 27,5 28.0 26.2 23.6 25.7 28,4
36-45 17,8 16.9 13,7 1811 14,9 16.0
46-60 14.6 15,4 16.3 16.8 14.6 16.3
61 and over 19.7 16.2 17.8 18.6 1516 14.9
Sex
Male 45.8 45.0 44,9 44,2 40,5 40,6
Female 54,2 55.0 54.8 55,7 59,5 59,4
Race
White 89.9 88.4 88.8 88.8 89,9 87.2
Black 6.3 7.1 6.1 5.2 6,9 7.2
Hispanic 1.6 1,5 3.3 3.4 112 3.2
Other 2.2 3,0 1.8 118 2.1 2.3 '
Homeownership
Own 55.8 59.4 54.7 $7.2 53,7 60.2
Rent 44.2 40.6 45.3 42,7 46.3 3918
Income
Less than $5,000 7.6 10.5 9.7 9.4 16.7 14,2
$5,000-$9,999 11,6 11.3 15.8 19.1 17.4 18.7
$10,000-$14,999 13.5 14,8 16,9 11.0 13.0 20.5
515,000-$24,999 23.5 19.9 20.8 2413 25.1 23.0
$25,000 and over 36,2 27.8 2316
5251000-$34,000 18.3 17.5 16.4
$355000-$49,000 15.3 1119 13.2
$50,000 and over 10.1 14.0 7.2
Education
Less than 8 years 4.6 4.1 3.1 2.5 3.9 5.5
Some High School 5.4 3.0 5.6 6.6 6.3 4.6
High School Graduate 20,5 24.6 21.2 18.5 15.5 18.7
Some College 24.9 20.0 24.3 28.4 26,8 27.9
College Graduate 23,2 26.6 23.8 19.0 19.9 1913
Some Graduate School/
Graduate Degree 21.4 21,8 21.9 24.6 27.7 24.1
5
TABLE 1 (Continued)
Characteristic Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Length of Residence
3.12 months 8.9 7,8 7.3 5.5 9.5 12.0
1-5 years 35,2 34.7 33,9 35,0 33.7 32,5
6-10 years 17.5 15.0 17,7 15,5 18.9 16.0
more than 10 years 38.4 42.5 41.4 43.8 37.9 39,6
Household Member Handicapped
Yes 6.5 511 7,6 No 93.5 94,9 92.4
Place of Work
Denton 76.3 78.8 84.4
Dallas 14.3 7.3 6.3
Fort Worth 0.8 2.9 1.6
Letirisville 0,8 4J 1.6
Other 7.9 6.2 6.1
Denton's stability, A large majority of Denton residents (76.3 percent,
work in the city,
The similarity among the percentages of the various characteristics
over the six surveys is a very positive sign, In almost all cases, the
percentages associated with the categories of each characteristic vary
by seven percent or less, and in most cases five percent or less, As a
result of the similar percentages obtained over the six surveys, we can be
increasingly confident that each sample was representative of the adult
population of Denton,
City Services
The largest number of survey questions concerned services provided
by the city. This section of the report presents responses to the
6
service questions. Included are the following services or service
concern,
1. Streets
2. Recreation, Parks, and libraries
3, Garbage Collection
4, [mergency Services
5. Animal Control
6. Service Ratings
7. Service Reductions
Streets
Respondents continue to rate Denton's street and road surfaces
as less than good as may be seen in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Condition of Street and Road Surfaces
(N=374)*
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Good all over 2.1 1.3 4.3 1.8 2.1 2.0
Mostly good 38.9 44.3 43.9 41.3 46.1 40.8
Many bad spots 5819 54,4 51.8 5118 51.8 57.2
*A11 N's are for tree 1984 survey.
As in the 1983 and 1982 surveys, a specific question on willingness
to pay for street improvements was asked, As may be seen in Table 31 in
1984 a large majority of those responding were in favor of additional
taxes to maintain and improve streets,
TABLE 3
Favor or Oppose Additional Tax For
Street Maintenance
(Na297)
Response Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981*
Favor 73.4 72.7 62,0 66.6
Oppose 26,6 27.3 38.0 33.4
*The wording o the question was a tered s ig t y rom the 1991
survey,
Those respondents more likely to favor a tax increase came from the
following groups: renters, and those in the 18-45 age group. As was
the case in the 1983 survey, there was no relationship between income
and favoring a tax increase.
Those who said they favored a tax increase for streets were asked how
much of a monthly increase in taxes they would accept. 'ihe results are
presented in Table 4. As might be expected, in both the 1983 and 1982
surveys, the majority of those who favored an increase selected the
smallest increase category. However, the 1984 results yielded the highest
percentage (19.3 percent) of respondents who indicated they would favor
whatever size increase that was necessary,
8
TABLE 4
Size of Increase 1984
(NA229)
Response Percent
1984 1983 1982
$ 4,00 r 47,6 56.8 57.3
$ 6.00 21,4 26.E 16,6
$ 8,00 4,1 4,2 .8
$10,00 7.6 3.8 5.7
As much as necessary 19,3 8.0 1f.6
Library and Recreationsal Services
Respondents were asked whether they had used the Denton Public
Library in the past 12 months and 55,3 percent said they had used the
library. More owners than renters (61 percent to 48 percent), and
more whites than blacks (56 percent to 44 percent) were likely to use
the library, In addition, library use increased with income and
education. Patterns of use varied among the different age groups,
Among those 18-25 and 61 years and older less than 40 percent reporte-
using the library, in the middle age groups usage percentages were
58 percent and above.
Those respondents who used the library were asked to rate the
services offered, The results are presented in Table 5 along with the
rankings from previous surveys. The results since 1982 should be more
TABLE 5
Ratings of Library Services
(N=172)
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 197w
Excellent 50,5 41.4 42,9 22.7 21.6 31.6
Good 46.0 49.3 49.1 58.7 59.6 50.5
Fair 3.5 8.4 7.5 14,5 17,4 1?...5
Poor 0.0 0.9 0.6 4.1 1,4 4,D
accurate than those of previous surveys, since in each of the three pre-
1982 surveys all respondents, not just users, were asked to rate librar;k
services. The 1984 results indicate a higher percentage of respondents
that rate the library services as excellent, with a lower percentage
responding fair aid no one responding poor.
Respondents were then asked whether or not they or members of their
family had used any of Denton's park or recreational facilities during
the p,~st 12 months and 65,0 said that they had. Use of park and recrea-
tional facilities was higher among renters than homeowners (71 to 61
percent), those in the 18-45 age group, and those who reported earnin!t,
of $15,000 or more.
Recreational facility users then were asked to rate the faciliti~is.
Again, the results are presented along with previous survey ratings j
(see Table 6). ^s with the library ratings, tl,e park and
TABLE 6
i
Rating of Park and Recreational Facilities
(N•239)
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Excellent 32,6 23.0 20.9 25.7 1516 26.2
Good '
56.5 63.1 64.4 57,1 65,2 55.5
Fair 10.5 12.4 13,4 14,7 16.6 15.1
Poor 14 1.5 1.3 2.4 2.6 3.2
recreational ratings since 1982 should be more accurate because only
users were asked to rate the facilities. As with the library ratings,
there is an increase in those rating park and recreational facilities
as excellent and a decrease in those rating the facilities as poor,
Garbage Collection
The city's solid waste collection services continue to operate
without many serious problems according to respondents (sve Table 7)
although slightly higher percentages of respondents did report missed
pickups in 1984.
Resnondents were asked if they would be willing to pay higher rates
for solid waste collection if the increase were used to help finance a
recycling or resource recovery system. The responses to the rate question
are displayed in Table S. Over four surveys, the response:; to this question
have varied. From the range of percentages, it would be safe to assume that
a slight majority of residents would favor such a progra^i,
11
TABLE 7
Garbage Collection Missed
(N*334)
Times Missed Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 19'?
None 10.7 83.0 18.2 81.5 85.5 16.2
1-2 18,9 9.3 14,7 13,2 10,2 20.2
3-4 7.2 4,1 3.8 1.6 1.5 3.3
5 or more 3.3 3.6 3,0 3.7 2,8 3.6
T*L E 8
Favor Rate increase to Support
Resource Recovery
(N=263)
Rcist)nnse Percent
1984 1983 1982 1'3;81
Favor 65.4 58.2 49.4 61.E
Oppose 34.6 41.8 5016 3~ .5
Renters and those aged 1E-25 were more likely to favor a rate increase
than were their counterparts.
Emergency Services
Questions were asked about the police, Denton's crime prevention
I
program, neighborhood safety, fire protection and the ambulance servi::
12
and are discussed here under the general heading of emergency services.
The first question asked whether respondents had requested the services
of Denton's Police Department during the past 12 months and 29.8 percent
reported contact. Those who had contact were asked to rate the services
provided by the police department. The results are shown in Table 9.
In 1984, there was a decline in those responding excellent or good and an
increase in those responding poor.
Table 9
Police Department Service
(N=109)
Responses Percent
1984 1983 1982
Excellent 42.2 38.9 36.8
Good 32.1 47.8 G .1
Fair 11.9 8.8 15.7
Poor 13.8 4.4 3.3
Excellent ratings were more likely among homeowners (52 percent) than
renters (31 percent). Of the white respondents, 42 percent rated the
services of the department as excellent. This compares to the 43 percent
of the Black respondents who rated police services as poor; none of the
Black, respondents rated the services as excellent. Females were more likely
to rate police services as excellent than were males.
Respondents who had contacted the police were also asked to rate the
officer who responded to their call. The officer ratings are presented in
Table 10.
13
TABLE 10
Ratings of Pence Officers
02105)
Responses Percent
1984 1983
Excellent 55.2 52.3
Good 24.8 37.4
Fair 13.3 4.7
Poor 6.7 5.6
Gompioed to the department's ratings, the ratings of services pro-
vided by officers are higher in the excellent category. Homeowners, those
in the over 45 age group, whites, and those who earned $25,000 and above
were more likely to rate officers as excellent than were their counterparts.
Respondents were then asked several questions about Denton's crime
prevention program. Responses to all the questions asked about the
crime prevention program are summarized in Table 11. Respondents were
first asked whether they were aware of the program. In the 1984 survey,
81.7 percent said they were aware. That percentage is statistically
identical to those responding "aware" in 1983; both the 1984 and 1983
percentages represent a substantial increase over the percent responding
"aware" in 1982. Homeowners were more likely than renters to be aware
of the crime prevention program (88 compared to 74 percent). Whites were
also more aware of the program than were Blacks (85 compared to 70 percent),
although awareness among Black respondents was reported at only 55 percent
14
TABLE 11
Denton's Crime Prevention Program
Aware of Program (Ne372) Percent
1984 1983 1982
Yes 81.7 81.2 47,7
No 18.3 18.8 52.3
Participation in Program (N=303) Percent
1984 1983 1982
Yes 27.1 26.6 14.9
No 72.9 73.4 85.1
Safer Because of Crime Prevention (N=260) Percent
1984 1983 1982
Safer 45.8 34.7 35.0
Same 52.7 63.3 62.9
Let <5 Safe 1.5 2.0 2.1
Interested in Participating (N=240') Percent
1984 1983 1982
Yes 65.4 62.0 64,7
No 34,6 38.0 35.3
In the 1983 survey. Awareness also increased with length of residence
and income.
Participation in the crime prevention program was essentially the
same in 1984 as it was in 1983. In keeping with the above observations,
homeowners, older residents, those with higher incomes, and Yhites were
more likely to participate than their counterparts,
All those who were aware of the crime prevention program were asked
whether they felt safer because of the program, and 45.8 percent , a
percentage that is higher than those observed in 1983 and 1982, said
they did feel safer. Finally, those who were not aware of the program
and those who had not participated were asked if they were interested
in participaing and 65.4 percent said they were, That percentage is
virtually the same as those who said they were interested in participating
in 1983 and 1982.
Respondents were also asked how safe they felt walking alone in t11%eir
neighborhoods at night. As Table 12 illustrates, there appears to be
definite trend among those responding "very safe," The percent in the
"very safe" category declined each year from 1979 to 1983, with the 198.1
results showing a slight reversal of the trend, Nevertheless, there was
a net decrease of 10,3 percent in those who responded that they felt eery
safe from 1979 to 1984, Concurrently, the responses in the "very unsafe"
category have remained relatively stable, Even though the percentage
responding "very unsafe" increased in 1984, the size of the increase
only 2,4 percent over the 1983 observation, Old^r residents, females..
and those in the lower income categories felt less safe than their
counterparts,
16
TABLE 12
Safety of Ne.i hborhood
(NR342}
Ratina Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Very Safe 35.7 33.2 37.0 41.0 42.1 46.0
Somewhat Safe 36.8 41.6 38.1 32.6 29.6 29.3
Somewhat Unsafe 13.2 13.3 1513 14.6 15.8 15.3
Very Unsafe 14.3 11.9 9,7 11.8 12.5 8.8
For the first time in 1984 respondents were asked how often they
saw a police patrol in their neighborhood, Fifteen percent responded
they saw patrols very often, 32 percent said often, 43 percent said
seldom, and 10 percent said never, Both low income residents and Blacks
were more likely to be aware of police patrols than were other categories
of Denton residents,
Only four percent of the respondents reported having called the
Denton Fire Department in the past year and their ratings of the service
provided are displayed in Table 13. The drop in fire service ratings
observed in 1983 seems to have been reversed. Indeed, even though the
percentage responding excellent in 1984 is far from the highest recorded,
no respondent rated the service as fair or poor,
Similarly, those who called for an ambulance (6.5 percent) were
asked to rate that service, There a;ould appear to be a slight decline
TABLE 13
Fire Service Rating
(N■17)
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Excellent 64.7 54.5 85.7 82.6 58.3 61.8
Good 35.3 36.4 14.3 4.3 29.2 2f".6
Fair 0.0 4.5 0.0 4.3 0.0 14.7
Poor 010 4.5 0.0 8.7 12.5 2.4
in ambulance service ratings, although the responses have fluctuated o,4=r
the six surveys.
TABLE 14
Ambulance Service Rating
(N~25)
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1:'9
Excellent 56.0 59.1 75.0 60.6 46.9 5:.2
Good 36.0 40.9 20.0 30.3 34.4 2".6
Fair 4.0 0.0 5.0 6.1 3.1 -~.4
Poor 4.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 15.6 1..8
18
Animal Control
In the 1984 survey, 17.5 percent of the respondents indicated that
they had called the city about an animal control problem, Those who
called about animal control were asked to rate the service. The 1984
results suggest a slight decline in the ratings over the 1983 results,
particularly if the fair and poor ratings are added together. In 1985
those two ratings equal 50,8 percent compared to 40 percent in 1983.
TABLE 15
Animal Control Ratings
(Nn65)
Response Percent
1984 1983 1982
Excellent 23.1 20.0 17.9
Good 26.2 40.0 37.5
Fair 18.5 12.3 17.9
Poor 32.3 27.7 26.8
Service Ratings
In this section the responses to two questions about nine basic city
services are presented. The first question asked whether much, some, or
no improvement was needed for each service and the second asked whether
the service should be reduced if that were the only way to keep taxes and
rates at their present levels.
The responses to the question about service improvement are presented
in Table 16, The responses are ranked from the highest to the lowest based
.
TABLE 16
Service Improvements 1984
Rank Service Much Some No M + S
1 Street Maintenance 48.7 43.5 7.8 92.2
2 Electric Services 9.3 24.6 66.1 33,9
3 Water Services 5.9 22.9 71.1 28.8
4 Garbage Collection 5.8 40.3 53.9 46.1
5 Police Protection 5.6 40.6 53.9 46.2
6 Sewer Services 4,4 24,8 70.8 28.2
7 Parks and Recreation 3.1 43.4 53.5 46.5
8 Library Services 1.6 27.2 71.1 2818
on the percent responding "much improvement." In the fourth column,
j headed M + S, the "much improvement" and "some improvement" responses
have been summed to obtain the total percentage of respondents who felt
the service needed improvement.
There is an obvious and significant drop from street maintenance
where 48.7 percent stated much improvement was needed, to electric
services, where only 9.3 percent responded similarly. Looking at the
M + S column, only for street maintenance did a majority (92.2 percent)
see a need for improvement. And, only for police, recreational services
and garbage collection did 40 percent or more see the need for some
improvement.
For all services, except street maintenance, those 61 years of
age and older were more likely to respond that no improvement was
20
necessary than were those in the other age groups. A higher percentage
of females than males felt much improvement was needed in police pro-
tection. Also, a higher percentage of Blacks than whites felt much
improvement was necessary it recreation and police protection.
In Tables 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21, the service ratings obtained in
1983, 1982, 1981, 1980, and 1979 are presented, The same ranking pro-
cedure discussed above was used in each of the other surveys.
TABLE 17
Service Improvements 1983
Rank Service Much Some No M : S
1 Street Maintenance 49.4 44.8 5.9 94.2
2 Electric Services 8.8 27.1 64.1 35.E
3 Garbage Collection 6.3 33.3 60.3 39.16
4 Recreational Services 5.2 39.8 55.0 45.C
5 Police Protection 3.9 39.6 56.5 43.E
6 Water Services 3.2 19.5 77.3 22.7
7 Sewer Services 2.7 22.2 75.1 24.R
8 Library Services 2.1 27.0 70.9 2S.1
9 Fire Protection 1.7 22.7 75.7 21.4
I
' 21
TABLE 18
Service Improvement 1982
Rank Service Much Some No M + S
I Street Maintenance 36.9 52.3 10.8 89.2
2 Police 4.6 43.1 $2.3 47.7
3 Garbage Collection 3.6 28.9 67.4 32.6
4 Recreation 3.1 37.3 59.6 40.4
5 Fire 115 29.4 6911 30.9
6 Library 0.8 24.5 74.7 25.3
TABLE 19
Service Improvement 1981 ,
Much Some No M t S
Rank Service
I Street Maintenance 36.9 52.3 1018 89.2
4.6 43.1 62.3 52.3
2 Police
3 Library & Recreation 4.4 38.5 57.2 42.0
4 Fire 2.6 29.6 67.8 32.2
5 Garbage collection 2.1 39.0 58.9 4'•.1
' 22
TABLE 20
Service Improvement 1980
Rank Service Much Some No M + $
1 Street Maintenance 40.2 44.1 15.6 84.3
2 Recreation 7.8 46.1 46.1 53.9
3 Police 7.2 46.6 46.2 53.8
4 Garbage 5.7 41.9 52.4 47.6
5 Library 2.2 27.4 70.4 29.6
6 Fire 115 26.7 71.8 28.2
TABLE 21
Service Improvement 1979
Rank Service Much Some No M + S
1 Street Maintenance 48.1 34.6 17.3 82.7
2 Recreation 7.3 29.6 63.1 36.9
3 Police 6.5 29.2 64.3 35.7
4 • Garbage 3.8 28.8 67.4 32.6
5 Library 3.5 25.3 71.2 29.8
6 Fire 2.7 1819 78.4 21.6
23
The most obvious conclusion that may be drawn from the six data
sets is that streets continue to be identified as a primary problem by a
majority of residents. Shifts in the rankings for the other services
have occurred over the six surveysi however, the percentages involved in
the "much improvement" category are small and would suggest that residents
do not view any of the other service areas as being major problems. When
the M + S column is examined; however, it should be noted that three
service areas, recreation, police protection, and garbage collection
ranked the highest in each of the six surveys,
Service Reductions
Respondents were read the nine services again and they were asked
whether they would favor reducing any of them in order to keep taxes
and rates the same as they are today, The services are ranked from the
highest to lowest percent saying "yes" in the 1984 survey (see Table 22.
In the 1983 survey three services, energy, water, and sewer, were
added to the list in the questionnaire. These services were also include-c:
in the 1984 survey. In no instance did a majority favor reducing any
service, although recreation and library services exhibit fairly higi7
percentages in the reduce category, In almost all cases, the respondents
in 1984 were less in favur of reducing any service area than were re-
spondents in previous surveys. If the three services added in 1983 are
taken out, the order of services based on the percent responding "reduce"
has remained the same over the six surveys.
City Administration
In this section of the'report, various aspects o`r city adminis-
tration are discussed. The topics include direct assessments of city
r
24
A
TABLE 22
Percent Responding Service Should Be Reduced
Rank 1984 1983 1'982 1981 1980 1979
1 Recreation/Parks 32.8 45.6 40.9 33.6* 42.3 25.4
2 Library 29,2 38.2 38.4 33.6* 35.2 20.1
3 Energy Services 19.8 22.9
4 Garbage Collection 17,9 27,8 30.1 24.7 22.4 17.0
5 Water Services 13.7 17.3
6 Street Maintenance 12.0 15.0 19.7 12.0 15.9 10,7
7 Sewer Services 11.9 13.7
8 Police Protection 4.4 7.1 4,4 5.4 11.5 8.3
9 Fire Protection 3.0 5.8 3.7 3.4 8.4 6.8
*Recreation and, library services were combined in 1(,'u1,
operation, services that are being classified as administrative, and
activities, such as the city's efforts to attract industry, and Denton 's
growth rate that are difficult to place in other categories,
Respondents were asked whether they had contacted any city officials
about a complaint, a request for services, or for information in the past
12 montns and 20.4 percent said they had contacted a city official, Those
who had made a contact then were asked who they contacted, whether the)
were satisfied with the results, and whether the individual was helpfu'..
Table 23 presents the responses to all these questions.
More whites (21 percent) than Blacks (4 percent) contacted the city.
Contacts also increased with income. The response patterns for the of°ice
25
TABLE 23
Contact With City
Office Contacted (NQ73) Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
City Manager 8,2 11.6 6,4 6.0 8.3 5.3
Mayor or Council 4.1 6.3 6,4 4.6 5,0 7.6
Police 8.2 6,3 12.8 11.9 15,7 15.2
City-Attorney 4,1 3,2 5,1 3,3 1.7
Municipal Court Clerk 1.4 3.2
Utility Service 30.1 43.2 32.1 3015 26.4 43.8
Other 43.8 26.3 37.2 24.5 24,8 25.1
Satisfaction (N=73) Percent
Satisfied 64.0 75.8 71.2 67.3. 66.1 55.7
Not Satisfied 33.3 23.2 21.2 31.5 33.1 38.2
Not Complete 2.1 1.0 7.5 1.2 0.8 4.1
Opinion of Contact (N-72) Percent
Helpful 81.1 87.8 86.1 83,0 81.6 79.9
Not Helpful 18.9 12.2 13.9 17.0 18.4 20.1
contacted, the degree of satisfaction, and ttie opinion of the contact
have remained relatively constant over the six surveys.
Since the 1982 survey, several questions about utility billinc
have been asked, First, respondents were asked whethp,r they had ex-
perienced a problem with their utility bill in the past 12 months and
28
in 1984, 21.6 percent said they had experienced a problem, In all threo
surveys incorrect billing was the most common problem (50 percent in 19841,
followed by meter reading errors (24,1 percent in 19$4), Finally,
respondents were asked if the problem was satisfactorily resolved. In
each of the three surveys approximately 55 percent of the respondents
said the problem was resolved.
In a general question on city administration, respondents were
asked to rate the way the city was run, The results are presented in
Table 24. The majority of respondents continue to rate city administration
as good to excellent.
TABLE 24
Flow Well Is Denton Run?
(N=358)
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1779
Excellent 10.1 919 10.1 8.1 6.3 S.'
Good 61.2 67.9 61.9 60.9 58.5 47,6
Fair 24.0 19.6 24.1 26.8 32.0 31.4
Poor 4.7 2.8 3.9 4.2 r 3.2 1+: .3
Respondents were also asked several questions about zoning in tie
city. First, they were asked whether they had been involved in a zoni-9
case in the past 12 months and 9.5 percent said that they had been inv,,1ved
in a zoning case. Involvement in zoning cases increased with income ;rte
home ownership. Those who responded positively then were asked whether
ci
the case had been handled fairly and 70.6 percent said, "yes." Those
who said, "no" were asked what the problem was in the procedures, and
most indicated that they were dissat,'sfied with procedural aspects or
the outcome of the case, Finally, respondents were asked to rate the
effectiveness of zoning in Denton, The effectiveness ratings are dis.
played in Table 25,
TABLE 25
Effectiveness of Zoning
(Nr%239)
Rating Percent
1984 1983
Very Effective 11.3 8.0
Effective 5512 69.3
Not Very Effective 33.5 22.7
Respondents also were asked whether they had enough information
about the issues and problems facing Denton and its citizens. The
following responses were obtained (see Table 26). The percentage
responding positively has remained constant over the six surveys. In
1984, homeowners, higher income residents, those in the 46 and over age
group, and whites were more likely to respond "yes" than their counter-
parts,
Two final topics are included in the city administration section.
First, respondents were asked whether they were aware of the efforts the
city has made to attract new industry and 51.1 percent said they were
its
TABLE 26
Do You Have nou3 hh);nformation?
Response Percent
1984 1983 1582 1981 1980 1979
Yes 62,8 58.9 62.6 60.5 59.1 48.7
No 37,0 41.1 37,3 39.5 40.6 51.3
aware of the efforts, Homeowners, whites, and those in the higher income
categories were more likely to be aware of the efforts than their counter-
parts.
Finally, respondents were asked whether Denton's growth rate With
respect to the number of houses, apartments, commercial stores, and
office buildings was too fast, about right, or too slow. A significant
majority, 61.2 percent, responded "too fast," 36.2 percent said, "about
right," and 2.6 said, "too slow," Those respondents more likely to
respond "too fast" were residents who have lived in the city for six or
more years, homeowners, those with college degrees and above, and those
in the 36-60 age group.
Living in Denton
This section of the report presents the responses to a series
of questions about Denton as a place to live, First, new residents (less
than one year) were asked why they moved to Denton. Although there were
only 31 people 1n this category, most said either a job ( 35,5 percent) or
college (41,9 percent) caused them to move to Denton,
29
A second question dealt with the appearanca of neighborhoods.
Table <; presents the responses to the question that asked respondents
to rate their neighborhood in terms of cleanliness, quality of houses,
and general appearance. Homeowners,and those with incomes of $25,000 and
above were much more likely to rate their neighborhood as excellent than
were their counterparts,
TABLE 27
Neighborhood Rating
(NQ374)
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981
Excellent 24.3 24,9 25.3 24.2
Good 48.1 51.5 51.0 48.7
Fair 21.1 21.1 20.4 23.
Poor 6.4 2.5 313 3
Respondents were asked whether portable advertising signs, litter,
dirty neighborhoods, junked cars, abandoned houses and lack of green
space in business areas detracted from the beauty of Denton a lot, a
little, or not at all. The results obtained are presented in Table
28.
As may be seen, advertizing signs and lack of green space in
business areas were the least troublesome problems. The other problems
received similar percentages in all three response categories, with a''i
responses being remarkably similar to those obtained in 1983.
30
TABLE 28
Appearance of .Denton--1984-1983
Detraction A Lot 'A Little Not At All
1984 1983 1984 1983 1984 1983
Signs 30.7 29.2 45.7 48.6 23.5 22.2
Litter 64.8 64.4 24.7 26.5 10.5 9.1
Dirty Neighborhoods 61.7 63.2 27.3 29.6 11.0 7.2
Junk Cars 62.4 59.6 24.7 24,7 12.9 1c.7
Abandon Houses 57.2 56.0 28.0 32.8 14.7 X1.2
Lack of Green Space in 30.8 26.8 41.6 41.9 27.6 1.4
Business Areas
A following question asked respondents what could be done to ia-
prove the appearance of Denton. The most common responses were more reen
space, more plants and trees, and general cleanup activities.
In previous surveys a similar question was asked, however, re-
spondents were told to respond "yes" or "no" to each area. The respcr,ses
from previous surveys are presented in Table 29. Even though signs !nd
green space received a majority of "yes" responses, their ranking in east
surveys was similar to their ranking in the 1984 and 1983 surveys.
Respondents were then asked how they rated Denton as a place :o
live and the results of that question are displayed in Table 30. Carlton
residents continue to rate Denton as an "excellent" to "good place
live." Specifically, more homeowners than renters (37 to 30 percent;,
Table 29
Appearance of Denton 1982.1980
Detraction Percent Responding Yes
1982 1981 1980
Signs 53.6 48,3 46.9
Litter 79.4 72.6 64,5
Dirty Neighborhoods 82.1 75.4 65.2
Junk Cars 77.1
Abandoned houses 77.9
Lack of green space in 54.9
business areas
TABLE 30
Rating of Denton As A Place To Live
(N=269)
Rating Percent
1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979
Excellent 33.9 38.0 39.1 45.2 35.5 45.3
Good 55.0 49,9 50.5 45.0 52,4 42.2
Fair 9.5 1018 9.4 8.5 10.9 10.5
Poor 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.2 1.2 2.0
_ 32
more whites than Blacks (35 to 4 percent), those with higher incomes,
and those in the 61 and over age group rate Denton as an excellent
place to live.
Summa ry
The results of the 1984 Denton Citizen Survey provide a good
decision-making data base, particularly when the 1984 results are
compared to the findings of previous surveys, By presenting the results
of all six surveys, patterns can be established and deviations from
those patterns may suggest the emergence of trouble spots or areas that
require some attention, Throughout the report, an attempt was made to
suggest those areas where apparent changes were occurring in past
patterns,
Intentionally, as with the past surveys, recommendations or
specific conclusions about suspected problem areas have not been suggested,
The purpose is to offer the findings in as an objective a fashion as is
possible. This reporting format should make the report and the informa-
tion it contains more useful to the staff and council, particularly
when the data presented are combined with other sources of information.
j160
CITY COUNCIL 81HUTES
trebru&ty 21, 1964
Tiaroatlonl eon ins the Civil Into & O)Otnt eienseork session with the Parka and Room, Counall
PRBSENTI MosibsrstAlford# Barton# Chsw,RNopkins•tand~Stsphene
city Manager, City Attorney, and city Seoretaty
ASSENT; None
PARK BOARD
MEMBERS
PRESENTi John Travelle, Jane Malone, Robby Roberts, Linn is
McAdams
The Council held a discussion on the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan,
Assistant City Manager Betty McKean stated that the purpose of this
discussion was to give the Counoil a preliminary look at the master
plan, The staff had been working with 6 committees and approximately
150 citizens,
om the
staffawasRLookingofor linpu oduced the
Steve Parke Brinkman,
and stated that EtheParke
wouldheld bewscheduledlwithnthenDISD nand
Council, commission A(additionalmeeting meetingsbeen
School Hoard prior to final approval of the master plan), many
an
leisure hneeds, allowingn involved and ccitizens oratherk thand
hiring a consultant as was done by many Cities,
The plan would create standards for park and recreation areas.
These standards would affect the programs which would be offered, as
to well as Identify defici areas.
provide cot orderlytimprovelasnteofuexisting areas and look for
most appropriate site for the future, The pllaaiio ould is provide I ands
give th
community maxbetmtera qualityeOftllifeusandoprovide meaningful leisure
services, A procedure was established cot annual upgrading of the
plan,
There were three groups of information in the plan;
1. The citizen groups aino s the (community)ng Input
from approximately 150 people
2, The professional staff recommendations
1. The recommendations based on the results of community
surveys,
All recommendations had been taken to the Parks and Recreation Board.
The Board was and recommendations to determine review w they process lreasonabletandslogical.
The finalized plan would be brought back to the City Council in May
or June.
thingsdwhichecamehInto playrsuchtas ng that there were a
nurinkman then
1. The suggestions based on a comparison of national
trends, affected the
2, That the standards directly
recommendations
Advisory Groups were
3. The
Denthe ton,
compared rof of
Council Member Barton asked if standard meant ideal.
Brinkman responded yogi it represented what was the actual need.
f
Milting ofnFebruary 21,1n1904Ninutoe
page Two
Council Member Brt aor epreterehae ord standards in the preii~einary plan
were e e in conk
Brinkman replied no.
Mayor Stewart asked If the plan included areas at the eohoo1s.
Brinkman replied Yee1 an inventory had been completed on areas which
schools felt this was a real
were actually available, Pro Tom opportunity for cooperation with stated he
schools. there acreslof
and Brinkman
neighborhood park land per 1,000 population and 5 acres of community
park land per 1,000 population. The City was currently 100 acres
short in both categories,
many facilities began in a central location and branched out, but
Denton's centers were not. The Denta nd North Lakes Recreation
recommending p6 central
center we, to on ooncentration wash on the east.of The w Staff while
portioniofatown, transportation Moo and afr.omrthe centerh wasoaecohceca
The teens wanted a place for social and team sports while physical
walking vand s a wore the teufrequent dsuggestion
for fitness
from the nelghborhoods surveyed was for more swimming pools.
Co n cilagd Member Barton families It the City was currently serving more children, Brinkman responded that it was difficult to say because
there were
lots of children involved In departmental programs during the Summer.
approximaat lyr$00aboyseanda400_SooagirlseIn rthe
Ronnie lthore oberto, member
softball program during the summer,
Brinkman reported there had been high usage of multi-purpose Confer Thand
the staff would like to expand by adding a in elementary schools e
staff would also recommend building gYmns
classes
ideaawasatoaallowhuse than the build Cityi Of school comsenftoers. The
and use by the school of theational greys, ark ex s had Of the ci with tho been identified and in every portion k
acreage.
of the northwest quadrant, there were deficiencies in Par school park
The hope would be to work with the schools to develop s
alter do nut
sires. Some of the areas identified as needing cause the staff to
have available property to develop. This would focus on churches and business for property to be used as
neighborhood parks. There existe4 approximately 50 acres which
acres which
could be utilized for jol.nt UL* and approximately a
would have to be purchased.
In regard to recomuendations twere i tof build 2 Brinkman reported d hstoftballrfields
In the Mack Park area.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the acreage for the parka included
developments which Included recreational facilities.
Brinkman responded that this would take a special study outs denthe
master plan and brought Into the plan,
possibilities available with drainage ways, linear parks and
retention ponds.
city of Denton city Council Minutes
Meeting of February 21, 1904
Page Three
Mayor Pro '11em Riddlesperger stated that no mention had boon made in
the plan of the Y and asked if any effort had been made to cooperate
with the Y.
Brinkman replied that a day camp cooperative effort had been looked
into but one problem had been that the Y required a membership to
use facilities and the City did not,
Council Member Stephens stated that the Y required membership foes
but he understood that they also had a scholarship program and this
6eemed comparable to the City's program.
Brinkman stated that the fields at Evers Park would be lighted which
would Allow for expansion of facilities without land purchases.
These fields could be used for girls softball.
Mayor Stewart asked about the total dollar figure.
Brinkman responded the total would be in the $15 million range with
high priority items totalling approximately $10 million with medium
priority items totalling approximately $5 million. Realistically,
the staff would investigate A number of ways to work with churches
and businesses and funds available through the Capital improvement.
Program, Most of the financing would have to be accomplished by a
future bond Issue,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated that In the past, much of the
park lands had been donated by the public,
Brinkman stated that approximately 50 percent of the current parks
land had been donated,
Brinkman summarized the recommendations of the preliminary master
plan by stating the plan would give the City;
1, A parks acquisition and development program
2 Help to beautify the community
3. A community center
4. An upgrade to the recreational facilities
5. A doubling of the size of the Senior center
6, An opportunity to work in cooperation with the DISK
7, An opportunity to offer expanded programs to the public
0, Something to work towards,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked if any thought had been given to
park development at the new Lake Ray Roberts site,
Brinkman responded that the plan would be reviewed annually and
priority needs would be looked at first,
Council Member Hopkins asked if the, greenbelt areas had been
considered.
Brinkman replied yes,
Council Member Alford stated he felt the plan had Citizen support
and enthusiasm which would give future support.
2. The discussion of Carroll Boulevard property dispositions
was not held due to lack of time,
3. The discussion of the sign ordinance for Parks facilities
was not held due to lack of time,
4. Discussion of the Parks and Recreation fees and charges
philosophy was not held due to lack of time.
City Ot Denton City Council Minutes
Mee tag of February 21, 1904
?age Four
6. The Council convened into executive session to discuss
legal matters, teal estate, persoanel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
Council convened into the regular meeting at 700 in the Council
Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespergerl Council
Members Alford, Barton, Chew, Hopkins, and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney, and City Secretary
ABSENTi None
1. The council presented a retirement plaque and resolution in
appreciation of Mr, Earl Jones, for 38 years of service
with the City of Denton.
The following resolution was presented;
RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF
EARL E. JONES
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is losing one of its most valued
employees, Earl Jones, who was employed by the City of
Denton on February 18, 1946, serving until his retirement
on January 31, 19841 and
WHEREAS, Earl Jones has always served the City of Denton and Its
citizens above and beyond the more efficient discharge of
his duties in promoting the welfare and prosperity of the
City, and has earned the full respect and admiration of
his subordinates; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has been extremely fortunate in having
enjoyed the dedicated and outstanding services of Earl
Jones;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
that the sincere and warm appreciation for Earl Jones felt
by the members of the City Council, employees of the City
of Denton, and citizens of the community be formally
conveyed to him in a permanent manner by causing this
Resolution to be transcribed into the official minutes of
the City of Denton, Texas, and forwarding to him a true
copy hereof; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
that the City of Denton does hereby officially and
sincerely extend its beat wishes to the Honorable Earl
Jones for a long and successful retirement as a member of
our community.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand and caused the official
seai of the City of Denton, Texas to
be affixed this the 21st day of
February, 1984.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
city of Denton City council minutes
Meetlnj of February 21, 1981
Page Fve
hTTESTI
CITY CHAR40TTZ DENTON, TEXAS ALLEN,, CITY 69CRETh8y
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI
JOE D, MORRIS, ASSIBTANT CITY
ATTORNEY, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
The motion WAS unanimous, the second wag unanimous.
on toll call vote Barton "aye,,, Hopkins "aye", Stephens "Aye",
Alford "aye", Riddlespeeger "aye", Chew "aye°, and Mayor Stewart
"aye", Motion carried unanimously,
The Mayor presented the proclamation to the Young People In Action,
The proclamation was accepted by Ray Richards and Eno Ek-Pen-yng~
The
proclamationpwaseao eptedebypacmemberi Of tfhe Dieteticohasoclatlon,The
The Mayor presented a proclamation for March National Professional
social work Month, The proclamation wag accepted by Eileen Short,
The Mayor presented a proclamation declaring February 20-26 to
Patriotism Week, The proclamation was accepted by Charles Hopkins
for the Denton Elko Lodge,
2, The Council roceiVed bids for the purchase of $1,000,000 of
utility system Revenue Bonds,
Frank Medanich, representative of First Southwest Company, reported
that four proposals had been wrecaaVodnot , eThe first ffective pntersl was rom
Dean whitter Rentals Corp,
9,4366%, Rausoher, Piece Refsnes, Inc. with a net effective
Interest rate of 9.413%, Kidder Peabody and Company with a net
effective Interest rate of 9,265278%, and Rotan Mosel with a net
effective interest rate 9.196944%
recMedankch ommendationnlateririn the
meeting,
3, Consent Agenda
Moti n carried unanimousslyConaent Agenda be
AVOtoved as presented. Stephens
A. Bids and Purchase 0fdersl
11 eld 4 9231 - Lee Meadows atroet
participation
2, Bid N 9237 - Concrete work, annual contract
31 Bid 0 9238 - Police Sedans
4, Bid N 9239 - Dump trucks and body
5. Bid 0 9240 - Pick-up trucks and van
6. Bid 4 8242 - Street light polas and wire
city of Denton city aounoil minutes
Meetinof February 21, 1964
Page SIX
, Roplatet
1, Consider approval of the final replatOaks
part of lot 3, blok D, Shady
Industrial d r.dommends (The rovalnjng and
Zoning Com
C. Tax Rsfundl
1. Consider
mortgage company approval in the amount refund
of u $592.76Ryan Or a tax Board of Dlreotore received
sea report of TMPA activities by the
B
Dr, Roland Vela, TMPA Board of Directors representative,
reported that ascheduled close
overhaulohadobegunconlF'ebruary 17,
normal one y Y0
and the plat would recp9n on March 19. Some revisions would be
made at the site in response to several problemo defined during
the cold weather,
The cost of production of power during October was 40,46 mils,
43,07 mile in Novemusr, and 43,61 mils in December for an
average of 4r2er 1 kiloua6t pOUZlowatt hour, The figure for Denton
was a
The monetary management was going very well, A swap In bonds
in eo diAb%i Bad realized ida profit of !14,00(, with other smaller
gain$ the
Vela Furth-Ac reported that a management report prepared by he boa agency stated that the gueotion ahad nd thee raised yes
and
membe:;s if lignite acs being left generators. Vela a stated that hee woulds likeugforct~he Council
no. board Members and staff to examine the report.
Council Member Barton stated that the $14,000 savings was a
significant figure,
nQt hate according ttothe
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperge~asstated
report, the mining company t extra coal
mined but once lost, it could not be regained,
councMember how stted th the Council needed to protect
the Interest citizens.
Council Member Hopkins directed the staff to investigate,
the
GeneraltManagerdWaggonor ontent
to city Witthhold rinChriG formationHartung by TMPAstated
agency and a meeting would be held in the future to discuss
this issue.
Council Member e atnd Barton this stated he felt Director of utilities
Nelson should
Council Member Stephens offered thanks to Dr, Vela for his
seevice the N of Directors 9totisave that
the budget committee, Vela had helped hundreds of
millions of dollars, DDr, Vela a valuable him should t
board and suggested a resolution re he
prepared.
Council
re olutionaondthehnexthCouncildagenda,to see the
rreappointMememnber
pity of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of tebruary 21, 1964
Page seven
51 The council oon9idered approval of the use of read Moore
p&VX for t open n ual June 19th 041 CAtion and the request that the
park on uhla l right Member to vote (or a aemmembe[iofoonerof the organization$
requesting the use NAACP, the park.
cit Attorney , Taylor stated vthat as Council Member Chew was a
Carl Young, President of the Denton County Vietnam Veterans
Association, requested use of Fred Moore Park for June 15. 16, 1?,
18 and 19 and that the 'dear tee be waived, Activities for June 15
Included a 16 team ball tournament, a live band, and domino
tournament. There would be a parade on the 16th and a continuation
of the tournaments, church of sethe rvices en onwith a7 h as
well as a general clean up o
contest would be on the 18th, Other organizations could set up
booths In the park,
Carl Williams, President of the Denton County NAACe, stated the
organization was a 75 year old non-profit organization with several
on-gotnq programs such as voter registration, Mr. Williams also
stated that it a conflict existed, the NAACP would bow out In the
spirit of oommuni:y unity,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked why the two organizations did not
work out a plat in which both could take part in a united
celebration,
Me, Yount' responded that the possibility of co-sponsorship had been sinc charter, the NAACP couldVnotnjointly fund theocelebration, not Have a
harter.
worked hwitht National NAAC tionowithout la cthe County
Mr. harter Williams mthey stated
C
Mr, Young Stated that he felt the Council should go with the
rotation system set last year,
the Donald throe years0his organizationlhadnattemptedstotbe involved
with the Juneteenth celebration, When the group tried to set up a
booth, they had been threatened,
Barton motion, Riddlesperger second to give the 1984 Juneteenth
celebration at Fred Moore Park to the NAACP with the understanding
that
Motiontcarriedrunanimously with C unciliMember Chowrobstalninq~ation,
6, Public Hearings
A, Z-14, This is the petition of Walter H, DeRonde (Jim
planned taquesting on oa
Stone agricultDuralop (A)t to Company)
78,112 acre traot out of the Ben)amin Lewis Survey. The property Is
located ad)acent and west of the Denton StI telSchoolf and easfcof the
Denton West Mobile (T Home Park papproved the PD would permit the
along F.M. 211801 1 (Teasley Lane). If
following uses;
neighborhood services - 5 acros
office/retail uses - 3.4 acres
single family - 51.7 acres with approximately 3,8 units per
acre (196 units)
city of Denton City council minutes
meetinq of rsbruary 21, 1994
page Eight
216 Medium density residential
consisting Ofremultitfam l yofourplex . is and duplex
The ttayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Walter DOROnde,
petitioner, spoke in favor of the petition statinq that the property
was bordered on the east by the Denton State School, and on the
north by the Sundown Horse Ranch, and on the south by the radio
theirb efforts affThesOraenbethe
lt
zoning station. ohanye and was supportive nofwould
portion of the petition was to avoid OM-16 zoning being backed up to
commercial.
0 entrance t to asked the office ase. off Teasley lanning on making the exit
and
Mr. DeRonde responded no, it would be through internal streets only,
Mayor Pro lineation m the dlLoop esp ine this asked if there was any progress on the
de area,
City Manager Hartung responded that the Loop would be much further
south.
No one spoke in opposition.
The mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, stated that 6 reply forms
had biin opposition,maThe staff h was preparing several revisions toethenDenton 2 returned in Development Guide which would be brought to
the City Council. The
first plan which H.. DeRonde had brought in was very dense. The
present plan shows less density at the site. The Planning and
Zoning Commission felt that the SO foot setback would be unfair to
developers as t.° to 40 more feet would have be dedic tied, aA
condition placed by the Planning and Zoning Commission was for a s
foot setback, This was a medium density residential area with
twelve units per acre. The petition required a final site plan
approval with medium density, The Planning and Zoning Commission
had voted 4-3 for approval with ten conditions, The conditions
needs Included 2181 and developer,s
therehwould be no access of curb wcutsnon f2161,
Council Member Stephens asked how many foot the staff was actually
talking about.
Ellison responded that Public Works had the exact figure.
Council Member Hopkins asked if thir was legal.
City Attorney C.J. Taylor responded yes.
Ellison replied that the conditions for the approval of the petition
were called out in the ardlaance.
Mayor Pro Tem Riddlespefger asked if the Greenbelt area would be
dedicated.
Ellison responded that it would be privately maintained,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked if the Greenbelt area would be
used for recreational facilities.
Ellison responded no, but would be used as a living screen.
Mayor Stewart asked if consideration had been given in the Denton
city offq Denton City council Minutes
page of February 21, 1984
Development auide to trying to keep arterial streets as traffic
MOV0ra,
recommended.
plus chow the second additional a cothe nditions ioas with
Bart conditions motion,
Motion carried unanimously,
7, Ordinances
A, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
Authorlrinq the Issuance of City of Denton Utility system Revenue
Bonds, series 1984, and approving and authorizing instruments and
procedures thereto.
the nkbids daand hoonfirmod their reported that First Soutwest Company had looked at
Uotan model. Motion carried motion. unanimously, to accept the
recommendation. Tom Spuregeon, representative from McCall, Parkhurst, and Horton,
Utility bonds
at i $50,000 would over 20 years $1,000,000
to O the O year of
2,004.
tit 1185 ordinance
stated beginning that the
b
The following ordinance wag presented.
N'>, 84-19
AUTHORIZING THE. I$SUANLE OF AND CITY APPROVING N AND UTILITY REVENUE BONDS SERIES 1984, AUTHORIZING
INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING THERETO
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance,
On roll call vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens Kaye",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chow "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye°, motion
carried unanimously.
B, council Appendix considered public an ordinance the amending sign
Artiule XVII o of f
restriction.
Steve Brinkman, Director of Parke and Recreation, stated that this
Department to allow
amendment would permit the Parks and whereeathere are tion De scoreboards.
some advertising signs In City park#
The following ordinance was preepotedo
NO. 84-20
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 17 OF APPENDIX B TO THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ADDING A NEW
SECTION "N" TO SAID ARTICLE, EXEMPTING PUBLIC PARKS FROM
THE SIGN RESTRICTIONS OF RAID ARTICLE AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
vote. Bartonn'aye'lw Hopkins t ,aye 11, Stephens "aaye,,, Alford 11 acae11
Riddlesperger Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye". Motion
carried unanimously,
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance to
quitclaim a 0,434 acre strip of right-of-way located along the west
side of Teasley Lane and south of Londonderry Lane. (Q-62)
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that this had
been reviewed In the late 1983 ordinance,
City of Dentod city council Minutes
Meeting of February 2l, 1964
Page Ton
Council Mambo( Stephens dsked if there would still be enough
right-of-way to most state standards for the expansion of Teaatey
Lane.
Ellison responded yes.
'rho following ordinance was presented)
NO, 84-21
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT of A UTILITY
EASEMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING rrM
MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIOKT,
TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY IN SAID EASEMENT TO THE
OWNER Olr THE TRACT OF' LAND CONVEYED BY SAID EASEMENTI ).ND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, on roll call
vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "Aye", Stephens "aye", Alford
Riddlesperger 'aye", Chew "aye", And Mayor Stewart "aye". Motton
carried unanimously.
D. Tt,e Council considered adoption of an ordinance to
quitclaim a portion of Ruth Street located between Cook Street and
Industrial Street with the condition that a 16 foot utility eaesa:ent
be retained. (0-63)
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that this
quitclaim had been requested by Belcher Corporation who owned two
pisoas of property which was dividnd by this strip of right-of-var.
The following ordinance was presented: e
NO, 84-22
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OP A UTILITY
EASEMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL Rli3hT,
TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY IN SAID EASEMENT TO THE
OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY SAID EASEMENT: AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, On roll .,all
vote, Barton Faye Hopkins "aye", Stephens "Aye", Alford "are",
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye Motion
carried unanimously.
E. The council considered adoption of an ordinance and
notice setting a date, tiff: and place for public heactnge
concerning the proposed annex6t ,n of approximately 7$.21 acres of
land located west of I-35W and Aouth of the existing city limits.
(Z-1645)
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that this item had teen
pr+iviously discussed by the City Council.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO 84-23
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PRO~FFIOSRD
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DEN"PON,
TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PU?LISH
NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING,
Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger "ayes', chew "aye,,, and Mayor Stewart "aye". *.,t I on
carried unanimously,
city of Denton city council minutes
meeting of February 21, 1984
Page Xleven
F. council ooneidered adoption of an ordinance and notice
setting a date, time, and plaos for public hearing concerning the
pvoposed Highway annexation 377 of approximately
the south side of Brush Crook Road.
(Z-L640
The following ordinance was presentedi
NO, 84-24
AN ORDINANCE BETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH
NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING,
Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance, ')n roll call
vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aya",
Riddlosperger "aye Chew and MayoY Stewart "ayo Motion
carried unanimously.
G. Council considered adoption of an ordinance and
service plan annexing approximately 175 acres of land beginning at
the existing city limits on the north side of Highway 380 east,
(Z-1621)
The following ordinance was preeontedi
NO, 84-2S
AN ORDINA~= ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1175
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE W. DABSS
SURVEY, ABET. NO. 328, AND THE J. WEST SURVEY, ASST. NO,
1311, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS
AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll c311
vote, Barton "nay", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford ,aye
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye and Mayor Stewart "aye". Motion
carried 6 to 1 with Council Member Barton casting the nay vote.
H, The Council did not consider adoption of an ordinance.
providing revisions and additions to the Subdivision Ordinance
including filing of plats, primary references, strrat costs and
participation, drainage and driveway culvert specifications, This
item was pulled from the agenda by staff,
11 Council considered adoption of an ordinance calling an
election for Mayor and two at-large council members to be held April
7. 1984.
The following ordinance was presented;
NO. 84-26
AN ORDINANCE CALLING AND ORDERING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD IN
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ON APRIL 7, 1984, FOR THE
PURPO€E OF ELECTING A MAYOR AND TWO COUNCILPERSONS TO THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FOR PLACES 7, 6
AND 5; ORDERING THAT THE PUNCH CARD ELECTRONIC VOTING
SYSTEM ADOPTED BY DENTON COUNTY BE USED IN SAID ELECTION;
PROVIDING FOR VOTING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION
OFFICIALS AND PROVIDING FOR ELECTION SUPPLIES,
City of Denton City Counoll Minutes
Meeting of February ii, im
Page Twelve
Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance, on roll call
vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye",
Riddlesperger lays", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye Motion
carried unanimously,
9. Resolutions
A. The Co dolroadconsered work withinatheocity limits, resolution
allowing the County t
City Manager Hartung reported that this was a procedural resolution
and a specific request would have to be made to the City for each
Incident.
The following resolution was presented;
R$ 0 L UT 1 0 N
WHEREAS, there are within the City of Denton, certain roads
which are an integral part of the county road system; and one or
more County Commissioners of the County of Denton have expressed the
desire to cooperate in specific instances in the repair and
maintenance of certain roads within the city which are part of the
county road sysceal and
WHEREAS, for such County Commissioners to undertake any
road work upon roads within the city, the express consent of the
city is required; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION
That the County Commissioners of Precincts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of
the County of Denton are hereby expressly authorized to repair,
construct, reconstruct and maintain roads within their respective
precincts which are within the city limits of the City of Denton.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21st day of February, 1984.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Byi
i
City of Denton City Council Kinutes
Meeting of February 21, 1984
Page Thtr t1en
I ktne motion, Barton second that the resolution be approved, On
roll gall vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aYe", Stephens "aye", Alford
"aye", Riddlesperger ,eye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye
Motion carried unanimously,
e. Council considered approval of a resolution protesting
the parole of John William McCrory.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesper9er stated this was an example of someone
who had admitted raping and killing a young woman but through a
fluke, the trial had been overturned, By means of plea bargaining,
McCrory had been given a 30 year term and was now eligible for
parole,
Council Member Barton asked if this did not place the City Council
in the position of reviewing paroles, Mayor Stewart asked the City
Attorney if the council would be put in a compromised position by
approving this resolution, City Attorney C,J, Taylor responded this
particular parole was of current interest in Denton and did not
believe the Council would be compromised,
The following resolution was presented:
R E 9 0 L U T 1 O N
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is of the
opinion that the best interest of the citizens of Denton County
would be served if John William McCrory is denied parole; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION 1
The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
objects to the release from prison of Denton County resident John
William McCrory and requests the Texas Board of Pardons and Parolee
to deny the request for parole by John William McCrory.
SECTION I1.
That the City Secretary is hereby directed to forward to
the Texas Board of Pardons; Room 711, Stephen F. Austin Building,
Box 13401, Austin, Texas 78711 a certified copy of this resolution
objecting to the parole of John William McCrory.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21st day of February, 1984.
RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR
4 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM!
C. J. TAYLOR, JR„ CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
city of Denton city council minutes
Meeting of February 210 3,984
Page Fourteen
Riddlespsrger motion, chow second that the resolution be approved,
on roll call Vote, Barton "ayn Hopkins "eye Stephens "aye",
Alford "aye", Ri441espe49er "aye", Chew "aye", and May0r Stewart
"aye,,, The motion carried unanimously,
C, Council considered approval of a re2011400n postponing
the regular City Council meeting of March 6, 1984, to March 13, 1984,
The following resolution was presented:
R E 8 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, a majority of the Council will be out of the city
of Denton on March 6, 1984, and it is necessary that the Council
meeting for such date be postponed until March 13, 1984; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
SECTION I.
That the regular Council meeting to be held on March 6,
1984 be postponed until March 13, 1984.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21st day of February, 1984.
RICHARD O, STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO t,EOAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Stephens motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, Barton aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford
"aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye
Motion carried unanimously,
9. Council considered authorizing the City Manager to enter
into an agreement with David M. Griffith and Associates to updits
the cost allocation plan and fee study for the city of Denton.
City Manager Hartung reported that this study had been utilitized to
develop the indirect cost allocation plan and was the basis for the
administrative management of the Utility Fund. This process was a
standard method used by other cities in developing fee studies.
Council Member Stephens stated that several years ago the City had
used a group from A&M University to do a street study with the idea
that in the future the staff would take over. Stephens further
asked if this fee study survey could be done in-house.
city of Denton city council minutes
Mestln9 of Fobruary 21, 1994
Page Fifteen
City Manager Hartung responded this could be accomplished by use of
a computer program which the City of Denton did not currently have.
This Would be espeolally difficult in the abeenoo of the Director of
Finance, The purpose of the study was to show costs of various
activities and Services provided by the City of Denton and ;N
retrieve those costs from the users, The (go study was separaF.e
from the cost allocation plan.
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second, to authorize City Managgt
Hartung to enter into an agreement with David M. Ori(fith to update
the cost allocation plan and tee study, *to,
Stephens motion, Chew second to amend the motion to remove the (qe
study portion for further Study and to approve only the indirext
cost allocation plan. Motion carried 4 to 3 with Riddlesperger.
Alford, and Mayor Stewart casting the "nay" votes,
Stephens motion, Chew second to deny the request and postpone ta,e
user fee study motion tailed 4 to 3 with Barton, Alfoct.
Riddlesperger, and Stewart casting the "nay" votes.
10, There was no official action on Executive Session items :f
legal matters, real estate, personnel, or board appointments,
11. The following items of now business were suggestedt
Council Member Hopkins asked for an update on the Colorado Boulevaad
traffic light situation,
Council Member Hopkins asked for a report on the tax collection tivy
rate and the percentage rate of mobile home taxes and fees.
Council Member Barton asked for a review of the wrecking gird
ordinance to expand the screening portion,
Council Member Barton asked for bids and figures on the retlcigs
insurance program,
Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss la;a)
matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments,
The following official action was taken under Executive Session
Items,
A, Board Appointments
Stephens motion, Chew second to appoint Vivian Edwards to the
Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission. Motion cacc.ed
unanimously.
B. Personnel
The Council considered approval of a resolution extending the
employment of City Manager Chris Hartung.
The following resolution was presented;
R E S 0 4 U T I 0 N
WHEREAS, on September 19, 1977, the City Council of the
City of Denton, Texas entered into an employment agreement wit-, 0.
Chris Hartung to serve as City Manager of the City of Denton, Tgras;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton is desirous
of retaining G. Chris Hartung as the City Manager of the Cit7' of
Denton, Texas;
city of Denton city Counoil Minutes
Meeting of February 214 1981
Page a Xtsen
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS!
SECTION t
That the Mayor of the City of Denton, Texae is hereby
authorized to enter into a revised employment agreement with 0,
Chris Hartung to be effective immediately from and upon its date of
exeoution and for a period of one year thereafter.
SECTION II,
That this resolution be effective immediately from and
after its passage and approval by the City Council of the City of
Denton, Texas,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21st day Or February, 1981,
RICHARD 0. STEWART. MAYOR
CITY OK DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM! ,
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY!
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second that the roeolatl.on be
approved, On toll call vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins layers, Stephens
"aye Alford nayen, Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor
Stewart "aye". Motion carried unanimously.
The Council considered approval of a resolution extending the
employment of City Attorney C,J, Taylor,
The following resolution was presented;
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the City Attorney of the City of Denton is
appointed to office by the City Council and serves at the pleasure
of the City Council under the terms and provisions of Article VI of
the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, on November 12, 1979 the City Council of the City
of Denton appointed C, J. Taylor, Jr„ City Attorney of the City of
Denton, Texas: and
WHEREAS, the employment contract of C, J. Taylor, Jr, has,
been extended by the City Council of the City of Denton from year to
year; and
City of Denton city Council Minutes
Mooting of February 21, 1044
Page Seventeen
WHEREAS, after the annual performanoe review, the City
Council of the City of Denton is desirous of retaining C. J. Taylor,
Jr. As the City Attorney of the City of Denton, Toxasl
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CIT'i COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI
SECTION 1.
The City Council of the City of Denton hereby extends the
employment contract of C. J. Taylor, Jr, as City Attorney of the
City of Denton, Texas, for an additional one year to perform the
function and duties specified in the City Charter, the City Code,
and the laws of the State of Texas, and to perform such other
legally permissible and proper duties and funotions as the City
council shall from time to time assign,
,2ECTION It.
The City Council agrees to pay C. J. Taylor, Jr, for his
services an annual base salary of 1145,115,20 payable in Installments
at the same time as other employees of the City are paid,
SECTION Ill.
An annual performance review will be conducted by the City
Council during the month of October of each year, and the City
council agrees to Increase said base salary, fringe or other
benefits in ouch amounts and to such an extent as the City Council
may determine that it is desirable to do so on the basis of the
annual performance review made at the same time as similar
consideration is given to other employees of the city,
SECTION IV,
It to recognized that the City Attorney hag to devote a
great deal of his time outside normal office hours to business of
the City, and to that end, the City Attorney will be allowed to take
compensatory time off as he shall deem appropriate during said
normal office hours; provided, however, the City Attorney shall
devote his entl.re time to the performance of the duties and shall
not spend more than ten (10) hours per week in teaching, consulting,
or other non-City connected bugineas without the prior approval of
the City Council,
The City Council hereby agrees to budget and pay the travel
and subsistence expenses of the City Attorney for professional and
official development and to adequately pursue necessary official and
other functions for the City, including but not limited to the
Annual Conference of the Municipal Law Officers, City Attorney ,s
Association and such other national, regional, state or local
governmental groups and crmmittees thereof which the City Attorney
serves as a member.
The City council also agrees to budget into pay for the
travel and subsistence expenses of the City Attorney for short
courses, institutes and seminars thet are necessary for his
professional development and for the good of the City of Denton.
The City Council agrees to budget and pay the professional
duos and subscriptions of the City Attorney necessary for his
continuation and full participation, including the holding of
responsible offices In national, regional, state and local
associations and organizations necessary and desirable for his
continued professional participation, growth and advancement, and
for the good of the City of Denton.
city of Denton City Council minutes
mseting of February 21, Me
page CSghtmsn
U&MU V._
Before voluntarily resigning his position, C. J Taylor,
Jr. notice In give thi t Council at least trty
his intentions to resign, stating the30r)easons
therefor,
In the event of his Involuntary separation as City
Attorney, he shall be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal
to sixty (60) days aggregate salary] provided, hVWeVer, that in the
event of his termination because of his conviction for any offense
Involving moral turpitude or any illegal act involving personal gain
to him, then, in that event, the City shall have no obligation to
pay the aggregate severance sum designated herein.
Involuntary separation as used in this paragraph means his
discharge or dismissal by the City Council or his resignation
following a reduction in salary or other financial benefits of the
City Attorney In a greater percentage than an applicable In the event
the aorose-the
refuse$ following afwritten Cnotice to comply or with any other
provisions benefiting the City Attorney herein or the City Attorney
resigns, following a sug4estion, whether formal or informal, by the
City at ohis i oI that he resign, ption be deemed toebe In that City
may
reduction or such refusal to comply within the meaning and context
of the herein severance pay provision,
SECTION VI..
All provisions of the City Charter, City Code, and Rules
and Regulations of the City adopted by the City Council relating to
vacation and siok leave, retirement and pension system
contributions, holidays and other fringe benefits and working
conditions as they ;,ow exist or hereafter may be amended, shall
apply to the City Attorney as it would to other employees of the
city, in addition to said benefits enumerated specifically for the
benefit of the City Attorney, except as herein provided, The City and sick
leave n benefits as areltaccorded Ceother department vheads, n including
provisions governing accrual and payment therefor on termination of
employment.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 21st day of February, 1994,
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
City of Denton city counoil Minutes
Meeting of February al, 1984
Page Nineteen
Barton motion, Chew eooond that the revolution be approved, On coll.
oall Vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford
"aye Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart ^aye",
Motion carried unanimously,
With no further items of business the mooting was ad)ourned,
RICHARD 00 STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
O187)
CITY COVNC14 MINUTZO
March 17, 004
The Council convened into a work cession in the Civil Defense Room,
UZOENTI Mayor stewattl Mayor Pro 't`om Riddlespecylel Council
M*%berss Alford, Barton, Chew, Hopkins, and Stephen•
ABSENTI None
11 The Council reoeiwd a report on the Arts Council buildlag,
Mr, Clovis Morriason, representing the Grextsc Denton Acts council,
introduced Gary Jucen who was the architect for the renovation
pro)eot
Mr. Juren prssented blueprints of trio plans which delineated packing
lots and an open green space area. A briefing followed on the
progress of this renovations and pro.leoted completion date. The Arts
council would be coming to the City Council at a later date to
request council approval of the project.
2. The Council oonsideced the emergency addendum item to
approve a proposal from Fulton Supply Company,
Bob Nelson, Dirsct:r of Utilities, reported that the city hid
attempted to find a salvage company to remove the pipes, pumps, and
miscellaneous items from the old warehouse area, There had not been
any takers. The city had two atecnativass
1, Have employees take down the equipment and Fulton
Supply Company would pay the City $700 for the material, or
2. Fulton Company would do a turn-key )ob for $S,300.
Nelson stated the Council should consider salaries and time the
crows would be tied up on this profeat.
Council Member Hopkins stated that this Item had been diaaussed for
several years and the funds had been budgeted,
Hopkins motion, Barton second to approve the contract witn Fulton
Supply Company. Motion carried unanimously,
3, The Council received a report on the 198-84 Denton
Development Guide Update.
Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, stated
an annual review of the Denton Development Guide was required. The
staff had tried to incorporate suggestions for improvement which
they had during the last year, Staff was asking the Council to
review these suggestions over the next two weeks and offer feedback
to the staff, The preliminac!+ draft would go to the Planning and
Zoning Commission at the and of Maroh.
Council Member Stephens asked about the time tables for euaetment of
the update.
Meyer responded the draft would be reviewed by the Planning and
Zoning Commission in late April or early May.
Mayor Stewart stated that ho would like for the staff to have the
various maps available and up for review when the Council considered
zoning petitions and annexations, Mayor Stewart also asked about
the portion of the Denton Development Guide stating that :here
should be no more than 300 moblio homes per quadrant which would
mean 120,000 over a 10 year period,
Meyer responded this was written to be 100 mobile homes total, not
each year,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked if the City could control Sunk
cars, boats, and campers parked on residential lawns.
City of Denton City Counoii Minutes
Meeting of March 13, 1964
Page TWO
council Member Chew stated that a definition of junk oars would 'ow
required.
City Attorney C. J. Taylor replied that, according to CLIT
ordluances, junk" vehicles must be lnopecabl• with no vali9
tnopeotion sticker or llosnse plates,
Mayor eof rOne and aneaggCity now ad two ressive Cod* fwoula
be underway,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespecger stated that he would like to see t~twT
City cleaned up,
Council Member Hopkins stated a real problem existed with cltiauz<s
dumping trash in the streets since the City did not currently hav,t a
landfill,
The consensus of the Council was to hold a work session on Macon 1 .
1984 to review the Denton Development Guide Update.
4. The Council received a report on the status of delinquent
property taxes,
in City Manaor. Hartung reported that the information on this Item vas
respond to any questions.
Council Membei: Hopkins stated that he would like the City to axpl1~1e
various ways of collecting taxes. The City Attorney had writtam a
memo ouggesting that another attorney be added for tax collection
and could also be used for other legal projects.
City hired, this e attorney 0. J. Taylor stated that it another City Attorney -was
and other law+luits.
Council Membet Hopkins asked if in the renovation project mere
would there bo space available for another attorney.
Taylor responded yes, that space wo,id be available,
Council Member Barton stated it would still be the same City, the
same Mayor, and the same Council Members. The psychologi..al
"meanness" of in outside attorney must be considered.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger stated perhaps the City should cons eer
consolidating with the school District end the COUni•Y on the
collection of delinquent taxes.
City Manager Hartung reported that the advantage of contracting -with
an agency or attorney for the collection was that the fee wou t be
based on a contingency basis; when the tax was paid, the collector
would be paid.
Taylor stated that the attorney with the School District colle•rted
thirty percent of the delinquent tax as a fee no matter who
collected it.
Inspections distributed f mobile reports home o 7-arks.
and on Svehla
Assistant al Y at the anager
traffic sign
Svehla reported that the new Code Enforcement Officer was on 't,nerd
and would be inspecting weeds and junk cars and mobila homes. The
request and inspections completed had doubled this year. imately Xhe
Building tnepector s office was averaging approx 25
inspections per day. An additional person could be croestraine,u to
also do plumbing and electrical inspections.
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of March 13, 1984
Page Thcee
The oonseneus of the Council was to have Assistant City Manager
Office- 20 a request co add an
$Vohla nal place person the covnoil
in the Inspeotor+ for
addiavehltiao reported regarding the signal light at Loop 288 and Colorado
Boulevard, the businesses on trio south side of Loop 288 were in
concludedh by mall
stating
theyr had gvr quested oreeninformation. representative
that the lead time for ordering any kind of traffic equipment was 90
days.
5. The Council convened into executive session to discuss
legal matters, coal estate, personnel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
The Council then convened into the regular meeting in the Council
Chambers.
PRESENT: Mayor mStewart; t Alford. Mayor Barton, lPro Chew, Hopkins, and Tom Ridlesperger: Council
Me
ABSENT; None
1. The Council prssonted a retirement plagva and resolution in
appreciation of Luoille Eggleston for 15 years with the City of
Denton Finance Department.
The Mayor coad the following resolution:
11r1A4LVTioN
TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME:
Egis %osing gleston, whoa waof its s employedt in iluod
the
WHRREAB, emplyee8 ° Lucille Denton
Sanuary 2,
nDe her rettireOf the City ment February of 29, Denton 1984; from
and
1969 until
WHEREAS, Lucille Eggleston has always served the City of Denton and
its citizens above and beyond the mere efficient discharge
the full respect and
of her tduties and hag
her subordinates; and
admiration of he having
WHEREAS, ethe Ci of Denton njoyed ythe dedicated sandeoutstanding services fortunate Of In LUCllle
Eggleston:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
that the
tyr Council,
Eggleston felt bey the me bersppofcitheon Cif
employees of the city of Denton, and a iz ns of the
community be formally conveyed permanent manner
by causing this Resolution to be transcribed into the
official minutes of the City of Denton, Texas, and
forwarding to her a true copy hereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 13th day of March, 1984.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
City of Denton city council minutes
Meeting of March l3, 1984
Page Four
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Stephens notion, Riddlesperger second that the resolution .-Se
approved. On roll call vote Barton "aye Hopkins "aye", Stephens
"eye", Alford ways", Riddlesperger "Aye", Chew "Aye", and Mag'.r
Stewart "aye Motion carried unanimously.
7. The Council considered approval of the minutes of :te
regular meeting of December 6, 1983.
Riddlssperger notion, Hopkins second to approve the minutes as
presented, Motion carcied unanimously.
3. Consent Agenda
Hopkins motion, Alford second to approve the consent agenda aL s
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda;
A. Bids:
1, Bid M 9210 - Tres trimming, Electric DLstributt:e
2, Bid M 9242 - Streetlight poles and wites
3. Bid N 9243 - Valve repair and additions
4. Bid M 9244 - Sale/transplant of trees
5. Bid M 9245 - Lease of farm land at the City of.
Denton Airport
6. Bid M 9246 - Cut-outs and cables
7, Bid M 9247 - aenaral purpose tractor
8. Bid M 9248 - Air compressor
9. Bid 0 9249 - Panhandle Street utility improveeesl
10. Did 0 9250 - Paisley Street water line
8. Plate;
1. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Mulberry
Crook Addition. (The Planning and Zoa:ng
commission recommends approval.)
C. Contracts and Agreements:
1. Consider approval of an agreement v;ih
Pierce-Catterton Executive Search Firm.
Mourn?Q of gag hl11,C1944i1 ttlnutes
Page PSve
2 KAna7*Rant ppS Assooiatso, uol Inc. fork Ptcatnlup
workshops/seminars.
7. Consider approval of an agreement with the ent,r,r,
Cultural Confederation and the enton Chanber of
Comateccs Convention/Visitor's Bureau for 4, 3*
allocation of the hotel/motel occupancy ta.z
revenues.
4. Consider authorizing the City Manager to ener.r
into an agreement with Dr. James Glass to oondu•,t
the 1994 City of Denton Citizen Survey.
5. Consider approval of paeticipation in an oversire
water line (1211) on £idgewa~nDrive ( to ssrV :,v
Southridge Village shopplnq
Utility Board reoommends approval.)
4. The Council considered approval of the resolution alos.ug
Fry Street between Oak and Hickory for the Fifth Annual Fry Strait
Fair/Spring Renaissance.
Mr 'Tennison, sigma Alpha Mu representative, appeared requesting .tie
closing of Fry Street and stated that the proceeds of the Fair wore :d
be donated to the United Way.
Council Member. Alford asked the date of the street fair.
Tennison replied that the Fair would be held on April 15.
noise he had
year Alford about stated the that
council citizens member
which was associated with -he
Fair.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the fraternity could notify .he
neighbors of the date of the Fair,
Tennison responded that the fraternity would notify the neighbors.
The following resolution was presented!
@~ggyUTi4t~
WHEREAS, on Sunday, April 15, 1984, the Sigma Alpha Mu
Fraternity is sponsoring a spring Renaissance to be held on try
Street between the intersection of Oak and Hickory; and
WHEREAS, trio Spring Renaissance is open to the gents-3i
public of the City and County of Denton; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the raid
Renaissance and in attend, the City Council deof the protect eof Denton safety of eto necessary
to temporarily close a portion of Fry Street between oak Streec and
Hickory Street from the hours of 9:00 A.M. until 5:00 P,M. on A4,jil
15, 1984; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS;
==ON-11 I
That Fry Street between Oak street and Hickory Street ar;all
be temporarily closed as a street or public thoroughfare of any kind
or charaoter whatever on April 15, 1984 from 9:00 A.M. until f;00
P. M. for the purpose of holding the Sigma Alpha Mu aigrinq
Renaissance.
City of nenton city counoil Minutes
Meetin of March 13, 1964
Page 6 x
SECI10 11,
That the portion of the abovs described streets /ha81
covert back to the City for normal traffic activity immediately fr:t
and after 6100 P.M. on April 16, 1984,
ggcT t oN,,.,3,I i .
That this resolution shall take effect and be in full fore
and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 13th day of March, 1964,
RICHARD 0, TT-&ART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CHAR40TTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LE0AL FORMI
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYI -
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second that tn.e resolution be appro'red.
On roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens °aye
Alford "nay°, Ridd1espurgec "aye", Ch,iw ''aye", and Mayor Stowicrt
"aye°, Motion carried 6-1 with Council Member Alford casting :he
"nay" vote,
4, Public Hearings
C. The Council considered the petition of M. S. Iake
requesting a variance of City of Denton Land Development C,nLes
requiring the extension and improvement of one half of Houston P.Zce
and the extensLon of public water and sewer mains actors the lull
length of the tract approximately 94.6 feet by 146,7 feet In d.:e.
The tract begins ad)auent and west of 2322 Houston Place and
approximately 400 feet west of Thomas Street. The property is azned
single family (SF-7) and single family detached developmenr is
proposed, The Planning and Zoning Commission had tsoommam3ed
dental, V-1
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr, Bob Crouch, representing Mr. Rike, spoke in favor of the
petition stating that the owner was trying to builet a single fa,n,ily
occupied home on the lot, Mr. Rike was requesting to extend the
water and sewer from the end of his house to the lot and was adetinq
to extend the ,lriveway from his house to the new lot.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked if the lot was on Houston ?:ace
and if there were no plans to develop any further,
Mr, Crouch responded that was correct. His client was seekim3 :his
variance to avoid having to build on a street Which did uo': go
anywhere.
city of penten city Council Minutes
Meeting of March 13, 1984
Pear seven
Mt. Rik*, petitioner, stated that he was seeking a variance to the
Planning and Zoning denial, He had purchased the lot last July and
had intended to build right away. There was a 15 feet streea in
+i front of the lot at the present time. Several neighbors had stilted
a petition stating that they did not Want a street, Mr. Rike stated
that it would be an unnecessary expense to build a street which. Aid
not go anywhere, He was coquetting to build a turnaround or oul.-•te-
Sao.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the right-r,-way had been dedicata,d.
Mr. Pike responded yes.
Mr. Martin Morgan spoka in favor of the potation stating that, he
lived south of the property and was under t).e impression that the
property which want to the center easement was dedicated to the
city, He felt the turnaround would be better than half a street in
front of Mr. Rike,s property.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the utilities would come from
Houston Place,
Mr, Rike responded no the utilities would be run erom Oak Stroot.
No one spoke In opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that Ibis
petition represented two requests in one, one portion of the
request was for a water and sewer variance, and the other portion
dealt with the street issue. The Planning and Zoning COmmissioa had
recommended denial. This was not a request for paving tmprovsm,n.yts
as there was an existing street, Planning and Zoning CommliKlon
felt that this would met a preoedent and though they understood the
unique characteristics of the property and technically it was true
that Houston Place had no where to go there still needed r. :r. be
appropriate access for fire and emergency equipmen^, The Plai.niitg
and Zoning Commission felt that not requiring th.* petitioner to
extend the public street would be setting a dangerous precedent.
Council Member Hopkins stated he felt that this situation was un,iquo
In character since the water line was in one-third of the way access
the propecty and the sewer line was in place across one-half or the
property. Hopkins further stated that soul imes the strict vules
did not apply.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to grant bath the variances.
After a discussion on the legalities of the extansion or the
utilities and the street situation, Council Member Hopkins called
the question.
Motion on granting both of the variances passed unanimously,
A. The Council considered the petition of Billy R. Jc,nes,
representing the Medical Building Company, requesting a chawpf in
zoning from multi-family (MP-1), office (0), and planned develr:rment
(PD) for office use, to the planned development (PD) classification
on a 6.033 acts tract located adjacent and west of Bonnie Brae
Street between 'Rest Oak and Soripture. if approved, the pLinned
development (PD) would permit the construction of a retirement
center comprised of a seven (7) story multi-family housing comirlex
(104,230 square feet of building area) and a 60 unit personal ;are
facility (25,500 square feet of building area). Z-1635
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meetin of March 13, 1964
PAq* ZIght
811,1 Jones, petitioner, spoke in favor of the petition and prvseato.d
a eendering of the proposed facility, Mr. Jones reported that these
would be no upfront money and these would be rental units, The -cost
4t the units would include two meals per day Cot the occupants 0.1
well ae utilities being furnished.
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked how much Mr. Jones thought t.Ae
Zen% would be,
Mr, Jones responded that the units would be managed by an outstfe
firm Out felt the cost would be below Dallas market price,
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayox closed the public hearing,
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, raportsd that 20 ce2.y
forms had been mailed with 2 returned In favor and 2 returned in
opposition The existing zoning to the north was multi-Camilp.
office and comnercial. The staff felt the low intensity called z -.,t
In the Den~.on Development Guide for this area was unrealist'~:.
Ellison repotted that in 1962, the Planning and Zoning Commissrh
had determtnei that the area west of Bonnie brae should be develcz*d
as medical ami was concerned about approving petitions on a lot by
lot basis, The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that tatis
petition was noeded and timely. The site plats for the deveiopmer<t
was adequate, The staff had encouraged the petitioners to eonsiier
a rear parkinyl lot or to provide a 25 feet setback to maintain t.ae
residential oharaoter of the area. The proposed development i'.so
included two curb cuts on Bonnie Scae and the staff recommended teat
the Planning and Zoning Commission consider these curb auto at a
later date, The Planning and Zoning commission had rsoommen-ft•d
approval of the petition with three conditions,
Council Member Hopkins asked what the required ratio was foe pack%nq
places,
Ellison replied currently the requirements were 1,25 spaces f2; a
one bedroom unit, 1.50 spaces for a two bedroom unit, and I. s
spaces for a three bedroom unit,
Council Member Hopkins asked if any study had been done which shrvcd,
that traffic for this type of use was less than apartments or of::;e
zoning.
Ellison responded yes,
1, The Council considered the adoption of an ordinance
providing a change in zoning from multi-family (MF-l), office ON,
and planned development (FD for office use) to the pla,aaad
development (PD) claastfication on a 6,033 acre tract located
adjacent and west of Bonnie Brae street between 1, it oak ~rid
Scripture,
The following ordinance was prevented:
NO. 64-27
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DEJCr.sN,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODA JF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE Y0.
69-1, AND At SAID MAP APPLIV$ TO APPROXIMATELY 6,033 %CXES
OF LAND OUT OF THE EUGENE PUCHALSKI SURVEY, ABSTRACT 40.
996, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS: AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCS,:BED
HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
City of Denton city council minutes
Meeting of March 13, 190,1
Page Nine
OallivoteosartonC"aye,,, Hopkins t"ayo",° tephen♦ "aye", Word On roll Ridlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye11, The motioa
carried unanimously.
S. The Council considered the petition of Lacey Satell
representing Medical Practice Management, Inc„ requestinq a ohange
in zoning from single tamilY (SF-7) to the planned Jevelopmeat (PD)
classification for light industrial (LI) use on a $3,955 tore tract
beginning adjacent and east of LOOP 290 app9Oxi11at4IY 300 test eou%4
of Spencer Road, 2-1642
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Mr. Mike Reynolds, senior Vios-President of Henry p, Miller, spoxx
in favor of the petition stating he was reprssen:.inq Me, sates:
This petition would bring the zonlnq into compliance with the Denta,t
Development Guide, The people who owned the property had n.r
immediate plane to develop now.
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that 5 repay
forme had been mailed with 2 returned in favor and 0 returned i ,
opposition, The current zoning wait mostly agricultural, The Dents<L
Deveio ment Guide policies were out of step with the current
situation as this area had seen several high intanaity uses. sh,a
Planning and Zoning Commission had reccmmended approval of a
petition with 32 conditions. With the planned development t?:
zoning classification, the City would have more control over t
development.
Councll~Member Hopkins stated with the extension of Loop 288 t0.43. 6
Mayhill, the property owner would loso some of his property :n
right-of-way dedication, The staff should try to see chat the .rap
288 alignment did not Interfere with development.
Ellison responded that Mr. Reynolds knew of the Loop 288 sxtens,.rn
in this area,
1, The Council considarod adoption of an ordinaa,tt
approving a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to :1e
planned development (PD) classification for light industrial t, G±
use 'on a 53,985 acre tract beginning adjacent and east of Loop :LL
approximately 300 feet south of Spencer Road,
The following ordinance was presented.
NO. 84-26
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DEN°'.`P►,
TEXAS, A$ SAME WAS ADOPTED A$ AN APPENDIX TO THE CODA AF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE N_?.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 53,985 A,:1rS
Or LAND OUT OF THE J. W. CHEEK SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1:4,
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRC'€.VD
HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Stephens motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted. On call
call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye'.
Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye,, 'he
motion carried unanimously,
D. The Council held a public hearing ooneerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 25,99 acres of land located
east of the existing olty limit along Highway 377, south of 3cnsh
Croak Road, Z-1641
Uity of Denton Cityy Council Minutes
Meeting of March l3, 1984
Pale Ten
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, spoke in favor of the petitlrn
stating that Z reply forms had been mailed with only I. returned
stating no preference, A proposed S3 acre estate subdivision was
located in this parcel with the petition 29.99 acres being located
outside of the city limits, Water from Argyle would be provtded to
City of Denton standards and SOWa94 would be handled thrc1.lA
individual septic systems, The Staff Was recommending sae
annexation of this parcel,
No one spoke in opposition.
'the Mayor closed the public hearing,
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second to continue with the annexation
proceedings. Motion carried unanimously,
E. The Council held a public hearing ooncerning one
proposed annexation of approximately 75,21 acres of land located
west of I-35W and north of Corbin Road. 2-1645
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, spoke in favor of the petition
stating this area was in tha Mason Tract and aas a voluntary
annexation.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Stephens motion, Chow second to continue with the annexation
proceedings, Motion carried unanimously.
6. Ordinances
A. The Council consideced adoption of an ordirtaace
approving the request of Walter H, DeRonds for a change in :owing
from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) class If Loation
on a 78.112 acre tract out of the Benjamin Lewis Survey, e
property to located adjacent and west of the Denton State School and
adjacent and east of the Denton West Mobile Home Park with
approximately 975 feet of frontage along FM 21,81 (Teasley Lame).
2-1634
Charli•I Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that this petition dad
been approved by the Council at the February 21, 1984 meeting.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO, 84-29
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DK%s-r-.k,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE COOc JF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE '*0.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 78.112 ACTES
OF LAND OUT OF THE BENJAMIN LEWIS SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. ti9.
AND THE JEREMIAH FISHER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 421, DESMON
COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; '-VD
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second that the ordinance be adopted. v'n
roll call vote Barton Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Al::rd
"aye", Riddlesperger ,aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye'.
The motion carried unanimously.
city of Denton Ott Council Minutes
Meeting of Maroh IT, 1944
Pigs Eleven
e, The Council gonstdered an ordinance approving additions
or revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance inoludlnq filing of plats,
primary ref►renose, street costs and participation, and drl~veway
culvert specifications,
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that this was an effort
to Clarify the Subdivision Rules and Regulations. This ordinance
would provide that the city would file subdivision plate with the
County, This would allow the developer whoever he wanted for street
gonstruotion and the city would pay the amount decided by bid
pries. The bid price would establish the participation prigs that
the city would pay,
council Member Hopkins asked if there would be any additional cost
to the people who were required to follow this ordinance.
Svehla responded he did not see that.
The following ordinance was presented)
NO. B4-JO
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY OF'DENTON, TEXAS, KNOWN AND CITED AS THE DENTON
DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDINO ARTICLE 11, CHAPTER It.
ARTICLE 2.03 RELATINQ TO COMPLETION OF FILING PROCESS FOR
FINAL PLATS; AMENOINQ ARTICLE ill, CHAPTER 111, ARTICLE
3.06, PARAGRAPH B, SUBPARAGRAPH (2)(0) RELATING TO
REFERENCES ON LOT OF RECORD MAP; AMENDING ARTICLE III,
CHAPTER IV, ARTICLE 4.03, PARAGRAPH (C) RHhATING TO METHOD
OF OBTAINING MARKET PRICES F^R CITY PARTICIPATION IN STREET
COSTS; AMENDING ARTICLE 111, CHAPTER IV, ARTICLE 4.15.
PARAGRAPH (B), SUBPARAGRAPHS (l) AND (4) RELATING TO
PERMISSIBLE WATER SPREAD LIMITS AND STREET CROSS FLOW FOR
RESIDENTIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS; AMENDING ARTICLE I[1.
PARAGRAPH IV, ARTICLE 4.15 BY ADDING A NEW PARAGRAPH (G)
THERETO RELATING TO STANDARDS FOR END SECTIONS TO DRIVEWAY
CULVERTS; AND DECLARINQ AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion. Hopkins second that the ordinance be adopted. On
roll call vote Barton "aye", Hopkins Stephens 'aye,', Alford
"aye". Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye and Mayor Stewart layea.
The motion carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
providing new water and sewer tapping fees for water and sewer
service.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this ordinance was
the result of An annual review of foes.
Council Member Stephens asked if the ordinance had to list thn cast
or could it be worded such as to cover the cost as opposed to
specifically calling them out. He also asked when the ordinance
would be effective,
Nelson replied that the ordinance would go into effect on April 1.
Council Member Hopkins asked if those who were required to tap in to
the Hickory Crack sewer line, such as Ranch Estates, should be
included in a grandfather clause.
Mayor Pro Tem Riddlesperger asked how that could be worded In the
ordinance as the Ranch Estates residents were not being forced to
tap in to the Hickory Creek line,
City Of Denton city Council Minutes
Meeting of March 13, 1984
Page Twelve
Barton notion, Riddleeperger second to table the ordinance to allow
the City Attorney to formulate a grandfat!et clause, Notion carried
6-1 to table with Mayor Stewart casting t,%e "nay" vote.
7, Resolutions
A, The Council considered approval of a resolution in
support of the Police Department Crime Prevention Grant from the
North Csatral Texas Council of Governments,
City Manager Hartung reported this was a routine Stem and the annual
renewal of this grant, The Crime Prevention Program had been a very
good ptogram for the City,
The following resolution was presented;
R E 8 0 L U T I O N
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of
Denton to authorize the submission or an applicatio,i to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for the City's Crime
Prevention Program; and
WHEREAS, Article 4413 (32a), V,T,C S, was amended to enable
the criminal Justice Division of the State of Texas to allocate
grants and administer criminal )ustics programe on a statewide
level; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such
funds and desires to protect the safety and well-being of its
citizens through the reduction of crime; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS;
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
eertifLes that the City is eligible to receive a funding allocation
from the Texas Criminal Justice Division for the City's Crime
Prevention Program and hereby authorizes the staff to submit an
application for such funds.
SECTION II,
That the City Council hereby authorizes and directe the
City Manager, or his designee, to tepresent and act on behalf of the
City of Denton in working with the Criminal Justice Division in
regard to such grant application,
SECTION III,
That a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the
Texas Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central Council
of Governments,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 13th day of March, 1984.
RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY,
City of Denton Cit Council Minutes
Meeting of March 1~. 4964
Page Thirteen
Riddlesperger notion, Chew second that the resolution be approved.
On roll? call vote Barton "aye Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye",
Rlddlesporger "ay4", Chow "aye", and Mayor Stewart "dye". Notion
carried unanimously.
0. The Council considered approval of a resolution in
support of a Polio* Department Juvenile Enforcement Program Orant
from the North Central Texas Council of Oovarnsents.
City Manager Hartung reported this was a continuation grant which
was in its second year. The ;unds for this program had been
budgeted.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S 0 L V T 1 0 N F
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of
Denton to authorize the submission of an application to the Texas
Criminal Justice Division requesting funding for a Juvenile Polio*
Officer to augment the City's Juvenile Law Enforcement Program; and
WHEREAS, Article 4413 02a), V.T.C,S, was amended to enable
the Criminal Justice Division of the State of Texas to allocate
grants and administer crlminal justice programs on a atatewide
level; And
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive such
funds and desires to promots the public safety and well-being of its
citizens through increasing the effectiveness of the Denton Police
Department in its law enforcement relating to juveniles; NOW
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SZCTION 1.
That the (ity Council of the City of Denton, Texas.
certifies that the City Is eligible to reowive a funding allocation
from the Texas Criminal Justice Vividion for a Juvenile Police
officer to augment the City's Juvenile Law Enforcement Program and
hereby authorizes the staff to submit An application for such funds.
SECTION [J,
That the city council hereby authorizes and directs tho
City Manager, or his designee, to represent and act on behalf of the
City of Denton In working with the Criminal Justice Division in
regard to such grant application.
sw,TION III.
That a copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the
Texas Criminal Justice Division and the North Texas Central Council
of Governments.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 13th day of March, 1954.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Mestinq of 144cch 13, 1964
Page Fourteen
Rlddlespergvr motion, Barton aso0nd that the resolution I's
approved, On roll call vote Barton "aye", HgKins, laye^, stepher,s
0,4yeu, Alford °ayell, Riddlesperger "aye", C sw lays", and M43'yr
4tswart 'aye", Motion carried unanimously,
S. The Council eonsidvrvd approval of a reoossiendatlon to
offer North MedCar♦ Health Maintenance Organisation (HMO) to sal
City smpLuyaes and retirees as an alternate health care program.
Kathryn Uscsy, Director of Personnel, reported that this program vas
in response to a city council request to investigate HMO. air
recommendation was to offer this to retirees and employees as an
alternate health care or insurance program.
Council Member Hopkins asked how many retiross were there currea.ty
with the City of Denton and what were the qualifications a
retiree.
Usrsy responded that there were currently 17 retirees with the C':ty
of Denton but the exact qualifications of a retiree had not Dlten
established,
Riddlespergec motion, Alford second to table the approval until a
definition of retiree could be established, motion cac:ied
unanimously.
9. The Council considered approval of an engineering servirPs
Qontract with Freese and Nichols, Inc, for an expanded Hobson St:ret
lift station.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilties, reported that there had i-rer,
substantial dsvelopment in the southeastern portion of the city.
There were now conditions which would require rerouting at the ltitt
station and the proposed contract was for engineering services,
Council Member Hopkins asked If tha,:e were not staff members y'ho
could perform these engineering serviats.
Nelson responded yes but that staff w4s totally tied up working -rth
other developmenta In the City.
Hopkins motion, Barton second to approve the contraer, with Freese
And Nichols, Motion carried unanimously.
10. The Council considered approval of a oontraet
professional services with Black and Veatch for an operatic,,, and
efficiency study for units 4 and 5 of the Electric Power Plant.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the staff had ':.pen
looking at methods to improve efficiency for some time. :he
consultants would look at thi equipment, consider the high cos: of
fuel and recommend ways to increase efficiency. It might to
possible to reduce the amount of. gas used, The amount of the
contract cost would not exceed $25,000 for the economic feasibll ty,
not the engineering phase.
Mayor Stewart aekod if the study would provide methods to incctass
efficiency of the unit whether we used it or not.
Nelson reaponded yes.
Council Member Hopkino stated he would like to $ee other ,:tries
perform the same efficiency improvement study in an effort tc n,ak,
all aystems as efficient as possible,
Riddleoperger motion, Hopkins second to approve the contract *ith
Black trod Veatch. Motion carried unanimously.
glty of pRgton City Council Minutes
MRRtinq of match 13, 1994
Page Fifteen
11, The Council Considered approval of an emergency
authorization agreement for restorat'.^e of services.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that during the wintRt
ice Rtorms, Dallas Power and Light had lent OVOWS to one area to
restore the service but the Customers still needed to have an
electrician to restore the service lines. This emergeacy
authoclsation agreement was A procedural agreement to Allow the City
to dispatch electricians to an area during a similar emergemry
situation.
Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the emergenoy Authorixatt.•n
agreement. Motion carried unanimously,
12. The Council considered approval of an agreement with Arthlar
Andersen to perform An exam!-nation of the City of Denton's financial
statements for fiscal year 1984.
City Manager Hartung reported that this was the aecond year t4at
Arthur Anderson would be authorized to perform the audit. V'!e
agreement provided for $6,000 worth of contributed servioss which
could be utili2ed during the spring.
Council Member Stephens asked if this agreement had been brought to
the City Counol.1 Audit Committee.
Hartung replied no, the aontraet for the audit usually was extemSed
for a 4 to 5 year period.
Hopkins motion, Barton second to approve the agreement with Arthur
Andersen. Motion carried 6-1 with Stephens casting the "nay" vote.
11, The Council considered approval of payment to North Texat
State University for drainage improvements to Welch Street.
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that in 1980-81 North
Texas State University had undertaken the drainage improvements on
Welch Street. This was the payment from the City for th;to
improvements,
Barton motion, Chew second to approve the payment. Motion Ovc4:*vd
unanimously.
14. There was no official action on Executive session items of
legal mattors, real estate, personnel, or board appointments,
is, The following items Of new business were suggested;
1. Council Member Chew requested a resolution appoineing
Dr. Vela to the TMPA Board of Directors for the Macch 20 meeting.
2. Council Member Stephens requested a status report on
the construction of the new North Loop
3. Council Member Stephens requested a report on the Fite
inspection fee for small businesses.
4. Council Member Hopkins requested a report on City
inspections of modular homes.
With no further business, the meecinq was adjourned,
RICHARD 0. STEWART. MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i)'709g
OfTY COUNCIL; MINUTES
March 20, 1904
The Council oonwned into the work session in the Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT; Mayor Stewact; Mayor Pro TOM Riddlesperger; Council
Members Alford, Barton, Chew, and Hopkins
City Manager, City Attorney, and City Secretary
ABSENT. Council Member Stephens
1. The Council considered the emergency addendum Item and held
a discussion of the TPSL rate Increase request.
crtsd that TP&L had filed for a rata
City manager Chris Hartung to
increase with the Public Utility Commission in Austin, There were
presently approximately 600 customers of TP&L within the Denton city
limits. The City Council did have the authority to suspend this
rate request for 90 days to study Lt, Staff would not recommend
this suspension but rather to wait on the Public Utlity commission
and the implementation of the rates Due to the time table involved
with the rate request, the staff was recommending that the City
Council do nothing,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespergar asked what would be the difference in
Denton's rates and the new TPSL rats,
Hartung responded he did not know, Tp6L was requesting a percentage
rate.
The consensus of the City Council was to do nothing.
Council Member Stephens Joined ~lle meeting.
2. The Council'held a discussion on Hickory Creak Park.
Charlie Watkins. Senior Planner, reported that Hickory Creek Park
was a development on FM 2181 about 1 miles south of the Most
southern point receiving city services, A 62 ante preliminary plat
had been submitted but no final plat, Construction on the
development had already begun, A representative from Holigan
Development had agreed to use City services,
Council Member Barton asked If there was a problem.
Watkins responded not at this time; the plats should be furnishrd
befor3 the construction began.
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla stated that the 1-,velopment was
not within the city limits but in the county.
Mr. Holigan replied that he was willing to take the risk or the
County not approving his development so that he could continue weft
at the site.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the residents of this devetopment
would use FM 2181 into Denton and the City would need assurance tzial
the development could be serviced by Water, sewer, fire and police
services if it was annexed,
Council Member Hopkins stated the reason the annexation was delay*d
by the City Council when it was previously presented was a problem
with providing services to this area, if the parcel was annexed. ;t
should be made to conform to City of Denton ordinances and standards.
Watkins reported that an ordinance would be brought to the Coun::l
at another meeting, This was a mobile home park and only :ne
subdivision. The interior could be developed to County and not 4:ity
specifications. Watkins then presented specifications of the
proposed development and stated that it would exceed the prosent
mobile home ordinance and would come very close to conforming to the
new proposed mobile home ordinance,
city of Denton Cityy Counoil Minutes
Meeting of March 20, 1984
Page Two
I
Council Member Hoppkins stated that state should view this
development as It It wets already In the olty Limito and should
perform a post/revenue study during the annexation process.
3, The Council held a discussion on the annexation of Solar.
May, Phase Ill,
Charlie Watkins. senior Planner, reported that there were drainage
problems in this phase of the Solar Way development,
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported Char, there existed a
ohannel in the development Chat was 30 feet wide at the bottom and 6
feet deep. Soma of the lots would definitely be In the flood plain,
and some lots would likely be in the flood way. No engirlaering had
been done as this particular portion of the development was still in
the County. Some of the Interior roads had a U degree elope and
City standards were 7 degree slopes.
Council Member Stephens asked if there sere any problems of this
same nature in any other phase of the Solar Way development. +
Svehla responded the City did not review because the development Was
not in the city limits at the time of development, No further
stated he did not think there were any problems of this nature,
4. The Council held a discussion of a renolution to increase
the charged for leases at Williams Trade Square and authorize the
City Manager to have meters placed on any unleaded spaces after May
1, 1984.
William McDonald, Administrative Assistant, reported that this
resolution would be presented in the regular session and the
recommendation was for an Increase in the fees charged for the
leases and to place meters on any unleaded spaced, The reason for
this was the need to recover the cost of the paving of the lot. The
current 10406 expLrod In April, 1984 and the fees had not been
increased since 1978. The motors would alleviate the problems of
businesses using the parking spaces without using them,
Council Member Hopkins asked if all of the proceeds from the leads
fees would go to pay the debt.
McDonald responded yes, and to pay for the cost of the meters.
City Manager Hartung stated that First State Bank had been contacted
and did not have a problem with the Increase In the too,
S. The Council rocelvod r, Status report On the North Loop 288
construction.
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that the Highway
Department had Inutrueted the, City to move utillties in this area.
The bid for the construction would be let in November with an
anticipated completion date in the Summer or Fall of 1984 for the
first section. 'this section would be Loup 288 at Highway 780 to
Sherman. The second section of the North Loop was in the design
phases with a final completion date expected in the middle of 1969.
Svehla also stated that engineecIng drawings were available for
further Information If the Council so wished.
6. The Council received a report on the atatute governing City
inspections of modular homes.
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla repotted that the City could
contract for these L,lspections. The staff appeared to be able to
handle the Inspections at this time. The problem had axisted last
year but had been taken care of.
i
city Of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of March 20, 1984
Page Tllrao
The Council did not tooeive a repots on tire Inspection
Cosa tot small businesses due to lack of time,
8, The Council convened into EXe0utiVe SesstOft to discuss
legal matters, teal estate, personnel, and board appointments, No
official action was taken,
The Council then convened into the regular meeting In the Council
Chambers,
PRE$ENTi Mayor: Stowartt Mayor Pro Tom Riddlespergori Council
Mombers Alford, Barton, Chew, Hopkins and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney, and City Secretary
ABSENT; None
1. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the
special called meat)nq of December 13, 1983,
Stephens motion, Chew second that the minutes be approved as
presenter'. Motion carried unanimously,
2. Consent Agenda
Hopkins motion, Rtddlesperger second that the consent agenda be
approved as presented. Motion carried unanimously,
Consent Agenda!
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;
i, Bid 0 92SI - Water treatment chemicals
2. Purchase Order M 61931 to Justice Welding In the
amount of $3,300,00
3, Purchase Order a 62429 to Cummins Supply S1 the
amount of $5,486,88
U. Plate and Replatso
1. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of Lots
A and a of the Denton Square Addition (The
Planning and zoning commission recommends
approval,)
2 Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the
Nazcrene Addition, (The Planning and Zoning
Commission reoomrtmends approval,)
3, Consider approval of the final replat of lots 21
and 22, block A, Section I, of the Bellaire
Heights Addition, (The Planning 0and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
4
4. Consider approval of the preliminary replat of
lots 1 and 3t, of the Owsiey Park Addition. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
C. Agreements
1. Consider participation in oversize waterline
(1211) to service Allan Estates Mobile Home Park
on South Mayhill Road near IH-3SE, (The Public
Utility Board recommends approval.)
City of Denton City wmo it minutes
meeting of match 20, 1484
page Four
D, Tax Refundl
I. Consider approval of a tax, refund to property Tax
Service company in the amount of 1804,22,
3, Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing concerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 25, 99 acres of land located
east of the existing city limit along Highway 177, south of Brush
Creek Road, 2-1641
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Charlie Watkins, Santot. Planner, spoke in favor of the petition
stating that 2 reply forms had been mailed with 1 returned stating
no preference, This was the second public hearing and the plan of
services was available for anyone who wanted to Oct them,
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the Ilublto hearing,
a. The Council held a public tearing concerning the
proposed annexation of approximately 75,21 acres of land located
weot of 1-35W and north of Corbin Road. Z-1615
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Charlie Watkins, Stinior Planne(, spoite In favor of the petition
stating that 1 reply form had been nailed with 0 returned, The
owner of the property was requsating annexation,
I
No one spoke In opposition.
The Mayor closed the pvbllc hearing.
4, Ordinances
A. The Council considered approval of an ordinance
amending the grass and weed ordinane9,
Assistant City Manager Riak 5vehla stated that the David M. Griffith
study had indicated that with the no-zification and ins pecIt I)n
process. a $53 to 155 cost was incurred. The administrative fee was
recommended to be Increased to 170,
The following ordinance was presented:
NO, 84-31
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE CA`DE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY CF DENTON RF.'LATINa TO GRASS AND
WEEDS, BY INCREASING THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR CITY
CUTTING; PROVIDING FOR APPEALS OF THE; AMOUNT LEVIED FOR
CUTTING; AND PROVIDING FOR AN RFFECTIVE DATE.
Riddlesperger motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted.
On roll call vote, Barton "aye 11 , Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye
Alford "dye", Riddlesperger "aye 11 , Chew "aye", and Mayor St9watt
"aye", Motion carr.ted unanimously,
B. The Council considered approval of an ordinance
amending the water and sower tappiag fees.
C1ty of Denton aitY Council minutes
Hsetinqq of March 20, 1904
Page FSV4
Bob Nelson, Dirootor of Utilities, reported thnt this ordinance h,Lal
boon discussed at the March iJ Council Meeting, The staff ha0
looked at the Ranch Estates pco-tats chacgea. Two more residents :f
Ranch totateo had been in to City Hall and ',tad paid the pco-cAi.:
ohargas dueinq this week. The sewer lines were all installe~t.
comppleted, and covered up. 4n amendment had been added to a.ve
ordinance to cover those people who had already paid the pro-rata
charges.
The following ordinance was presented,
NO, 84-12
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 28-7 OF ARTICLE 1, OP CHAP":T).r
2S OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF TH8 CITY OF DENTON, TE.U.St ,
TO PROVIDE FOR NEW WATER AND SEWER TAPPING FEES, M8"'LR
RELOCAT'ON FEES; *EWER MANHOLE N.REAKOUT FRES; CHARGES ?'JR
WORK NOT SPECIFIED; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFL:T
HeREWITHt PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING ?N
EFFECTIVE DATE,
Barton motion, Riddlesperger second to approve the ordinance wt th
the amendment.
On roll call vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins hays", Stephens "ayiI,
Alford "aye 11 , Riddlesperger playa Cb-ow "aye", and Mayor Stswati
'laye", Motion carried unanimously,
C. The Council consideted approval of an ordlnai„e
amending the wrecking yard ordinance,
city Manager Chris Hartung reported that this Item had been brou-;rat
to the Council agenda as a request of Council Membor Barrrza,.
Attention had been brought to a flaw in the fencing ordinance whLth
required that wrecking yards be fenead on the front to the Sr.:rt°t
but not at the rear to residences,
City Attoeney C. J, Taylor reported that this amendment would c:nar
up the language of the ordinance calling for fences to be along :Aa
,street.
Barton motion, Chew second that the ordinanco be adopted.
Hopkins motion, Barton second, to amend the ordinance to :ted
"screening" and not °fenceo". This would allow for shrubs v: a
living fence instead ok a solid fence.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second, to amend tho effective date of the
ordinance to read September 1, 1984 to allow citizens an opporCda:ty
to comply If they wished to use a living fence.
Motion on effective date of September 1, 1994 passed unanimously.
Motion on the amendment for a solid oa: living fence pasted
unanimously.
Vote on the main motion to pass the ordinance was taken.
On roll call vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens
Alford °aye", Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Sts,.a:t
"hyell, Motion carried unanimously,
S. Resolutions
A. The Council considered adoption of a resoLl-..on
approving the City of Denton Industrial Development. Authority
City of Denton Cityy Council minutes
Hooting of March 90, 1954
Page S x
Industtial Revenuo bond issue, FWD uevalopment Co. l.td, Pcojact,
Series 1984, 11,500,000.
City Managec Chtis Hartung requested that this item be removed (COS,
the agenda.
Riddlospergsr motion. Alford second to table the revolution,
Motion oacriod unanimously,
B. The Council considered adoption 0f a resolution
Olarifyin provisions of the franchiso ordinance concerning payment
of Costs lnaldental to rate request lnoreasss by General Tslephone,
City Manager Hactung reported that this amendment had been discussed
with GTE and was toady for consldscation by the City Council.
The following resolution was presented;
RES0i UTISN
WHFREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton passed on
fLnat reading Ordinance No, 83-111 on the 4th day of Octobsc, 1983
granting to General Telephone Company a franchise to operate in the
City of Denton. Texas; and
WHEREAS, General Telephone Company has requested the City
Council to delete the provisions of section XVIII pertaining to the
ceiwbursement of the City Of its expenses in analyzing and
evaluating future proposed rate requests by General Telephone; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the
requested section deletion should not be made, but instead clarified
by the passage of a separate resolution regarding Section Xvlli;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Of' THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS;
69CTION 1,
The City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby
Affirms that the provisions of Section XVIII of Ordinance No. 83-111,
pertainLng to the reimbursement to the City of Denton of reasonable,
fees and expenses of an independent study and evaluation of future
proposed cats requests by General Tolophooe Company would become
effective only in the instance where the public Utility Commission
is abolished and the rate making authority is redelegated to the
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas.
gr r.LQN 1~.
It was the intent of the City Council that rate increases
and reimbursement to the City of Denton for expenses would be
controlled solely by State Law and the Public Utility Commission of
the State of Texas so long as such Commission remains In existence,
PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of March, 1984,
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
A
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of Macch 20, 19$4
Page Owen
ATTE3Ti
CRfiRLO T4 LEN, 1T SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEUAL FORMi
C, J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
6Yo
Riddlesperger motl~)n, Chew second that the resolution be approved.
On roll call vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens ^aye',
Alford "aye Riddlespergar "aye°, rhew "aye", and Mayor Stevait
"aye". Motion carried unanimously,
C. The Council considered adoption of a resolution to
increase the monthly per space lease charges at Williams Trade
Square and to authorize the City Manager to have meters placed on
any unleased spaces after Pay 1, 1984,
Council Member Chdw stated that this item had been previously
discussed,
The followin-I resolution was presented:
R E S 0 L U T_1 O N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has improved and maintained tf,e
area known as the "Williams Trade Square:" and
WHEREAS, such improvements include paved parking spaces: Pt,d
WHEREAS, the City of Denton desired to increase the cuc2ent
leasing cites charged for the parking spaces in order to recover t.Ae
cost of the maintenance and improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is desirous of placing ,ae:ers
on any unleaded spaces ,after May 1, 19$4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE •:TY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
~ECx1.2N._4r..
That the City Manager is hereby authorized to puol:rly
advertise and lease up to one hundred (100) parking spaces at. the
"Williams Trade Square" at the pr.ce of One Hundred Sixty-.3, kl.,t
Dollars ($168,00) per year per space and to place muters or. my
unleaded spaces after May 1, 1984, ouch meters to charge a ca:* of
ton cents (100) per hour per space,
Pk$$ED AND APPROVED this 20th day of March, 1984,
RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I City of Denton Cityy Counoil Minutes
"win? of March 20, 1989
Page Eght
A'1"l'lsST;
CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY 840RHUY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROV>D AS TO LEOAL FORM;
C. J, TAYLOR, JR,, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
OY;
Chew motion, Barton second that the resolution be approved.
On roll 0,111 vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins "ays", Stephens "aye',
Alford "aye Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart
"aye", Motion carried unanimously,
D, The Council considered adoption of a resolution
postponing the regular City Council meeting of April 3 to April 10.
City Manager Hartung reported that since the election would be held
on April 7, a meeting would have to be held on April 10, Staff
recommendation was to postpone the meeting of April 3 to April 10.
I
The following resolution was presented;
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, a ma)oeity of the Council will be out of the City
of Denton on April 3, 1984, and it Is necessary that the Council
meeting for such date be postponed until April 10, 1984; NOW.
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS;
SECTION 1.
That the regular Council meeting to be held on April
1984 be postponed until April 10, 1984,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 20th day of March, 1984,
RICHARD 0. STLWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTT8 ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
city of Denton CityY counoil King%$$
Neetinv of March 20, 1944
Pape Nine
APPROVED A4 TO LEGAL FORMI
C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNXY
CITY OF DINTON, TtXA8
BYI-
Hopkins motion, Stephens second that the resolution be approved,
On roll call vote, Barton "aye", Hopkins °aye Stephens "aye",
Alford "dye". Riddlespetgar "a 411, Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart
"aye", Motion oaccied unanimously.
6. The Council considered authorizing the Arts Council to
proceed with the Arts Complex project,
City Manager Hartung reported at the March 13 Council meeting a
presentation had been made by the Arts Council. The Arts Council
was requesting authorization to proceed with the project so that
bide could be let.
Riddlesperger motion, Stephens second to authorize the Arts Council
to proceed,
Motion carried unanimously,
7 The Council considered removing zoning case Z-1626 from the
table.
Alford motion, Chew second to remove 2-1626 from the table. Motion
carried unanimously,
8. The Council considered approval of the petition of Joe
Below requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the
planned development (PD) classification on a 127.26 acre traot.
Mayor Stewart stated that the public heating on this petition had
boon held but he understood there were two groups who wanted to be
heard. The Council would allow one representative from each group
to speak.
Tom Jester, representing Joe Below, spoke in favor of the petition
and stated that he was present to answer any questions that the
Council may have, Mr. Jester distributed a list of the proposed
uses for the neighborhood services portion of the petition, Mr.
Jester also distributed photographs of the traffic at the cornet of
Locust and Windsor. The drainage issue had been addressed and the
petitioners felt that Bell Avenue would loop into Locust street at
the roost feasible location,
Council Member Barton asked why this petition had been tabled.
Jester responded the problem had been with the floodway open space
and retention ponds.
David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that discussions
had been held on recreational facilities.
Mary Hamilton spoke in opposition stating that everyone had been
satisfied with the plan but she believed that the plan had flaws.
Ms, Hamilton asked how long It would be for the citizens would be
asked to put in A Coronado, Stuart, Bell Street drainage project or
to widen Bell Avenue. She also believed that the schools would be
overcrowded and that this project would be a high density one in a
medium density area. Me. Hamilton concluded by elating that she was
not against progress but was against progress for profit. She
wanted to maintain a quality of life In Denton and to keep dollars
and cents oat of zoning changes.
Olt of Denton Cityy Council Minutes
Mee~inq of Match 20, 1944
Page Ten
Do vid Ellison, Development ReVlew Planner, repotted tua. the
petition is otiglnally presented had 44 reply fotme mailed with 4
returned in favor and $ in opposition, The staff had rscomsaen4e4
additional oondttione to the petition to testriot neighborhood
setvioes to the areas which had been proposed by Mr, Jester. Mt.
Below was not proposing socoer and football flulds and tennis ooutts
in the reoreational atoms, The Bell Avenue issue had been taken
back to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the P6x felt that
8e11 should tie in to Locust Street but not further north of
Hercules. The final drainage plan would be roviowed during the
preliminary and final plat process, A minimum front yard setback of
26 toot would be r4quired throughout the development. There would
be no on-stteet parkinq or portable signs.
Council Member Alford asked about the extension of Bell Avenue,
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported the staff had looked at
the proposed extension of Bell as well as other suggestions. A
slide was shown of the proposed loop and Svehla pointed out the Town
North Addition which was already built. This still left the
question of where Bell Avenue should tie In, The Denton Development
Guide showed that Bell in the future, should tie in to Locust at.
Heroules, This would create a five prong lntateeo?.ion which wore
very difficult to control, The staff was suggesting that sell
Intersect south of Hetoulas,
Council Member Alford asked where Bell would be tying In.
Svehla responded the tie in would be further north to service tore
single family areas. In response to the question of traffic, the
traffic past the school was very heavy with lots of pedestrian
problems. In addressing the drainage issue, the retention pond
would retain or impound the water on the site to it would not go
into the channel, This development would cover the soil with
concrete or asphalts however, the retention pl.in would allow for
drainage over a several day period after a rain. The channel in the
Aspen area was built to the 100 year level and would not change,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked what the diffet9nce would be if
only single family residences were In the petition and no
multi-family.
Svehla responded that Mr, Below had stated the retention pools tivuld
handle the rain water which would be the same for single or
multi-family,
Mayor Pro Toro Riddlesperger asked if the school was directly across
Windsor,
Svehla responded yes,
Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger asked if there were any problems with
the multi-family residences being close to the school,
Ellison responded that the staff had talked to the principal at
Strickland Junior High at length and had been told that not many
students reside in multi-family dwellings.
Council Member Alford asked if the proposed uses of the neighborhood
services were a recommendation from the staff or the developer.
Ellison responded the allggaetions were those of Mr. Below, the
developer.
Riddleeperger motion, Alford second to table approval of the
petition until Council Member Barton could review It. The petition
would, be brought back to the Council at the April 10 meeting.
Motion to table carried 6 to 1 with Council Member Chew castia; the
"nay" vote,
Misting of March120,C19g411 Minutes
Page Rleven
9, The Council oonsidet*d authotlaation of the addition of an
inspector position to the Building InsP00tor budget,
City Manager Hartung toocted that this item had been disc414e11
ihe voounotl by the iCouncil. A budget amendment would be brought t.r
Hopkins motion, Chow second to authorize the additional position.
Motioa carried unanimously,
10. The following official aotion on executive session itemu
was takeni
D. Board Appointments
Stephens motion, Chew second, that John Thompkine be appointed
the Board of Adjustments, Motion carried unanimously,
11. New Business
The following hams of now business were suggestod by CounatI
Members:
amount requested
much (repair work
expenditures, on att"t
Council progressingbe the Hopkins
had been completed.
With no further items of business, the meeting wait ad)ournud
RICHARCI 0, STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DEVON, TEXAS
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY L7CRETARY
01TY OF DENTON, TEXAS
0712q
City Council Minutes
March 27, 1904
rho Council convened into the special called meeting at 5100 p.m. in
the Council Chambers,
MgMOUS
PRhSBNT1 Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tem Rlddlesperger;
Council Members Alford, Barton, Chew, Hopkins,
and Stephens
City Manager, Assistant City Attorney and City
Secretary
UMBERS
ABSBNTi None
1. The Council considered adoption of a condemnation resolu-
tion,
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that this was an
13 acre plat zoned for planned development (PD) for single family
detached homes with 6400 square feet minimum lot si2a. A problem
had arisen in obtaining an easement for off-site drainage. The
developer had attempted to negotiate with property owners but was
being asked to pay what he considered an exorbitant amount for the
easements required. The developer was requesting condeariation
proceedings on the property.
Council Member Hopkins asked if the drainage was the outflow of the
13 acres,
Spivey replied yes. Ms. Spivey referred to a letter fron the
developer to City Attorney Taylor which summarized the situatiu:1 and
requested the condemnation proceedings, (A copy of this letter is
attached to and made a part of these Minutes.)
Mr, Brian Burke, engineer on the project, appeared representing Mr,
Joe Jeter stating that he was available to answer any questions from
the Council,
Council Member Hopkins asked what Mt, Jolter considered a reasonaFle
payment for the easements.
Burke responded that In January, property out of the flood ptaia in
this area had been valued at $2500 per acre. City Attorney avlor
and yir. Jeter had discussed that $4000 per acre would e a
reasonable price.
Council Membor Hopkins stated that it appeared this would ~e a
necessary step to obtain the proper drainage.
Council Member Barton stated that since the condemnation wo,.,, be
handled by t n o City, a contract for the reimbursement wo,:be
necessary.
yfayor Stewart stated that the reimbursement for the property would
be paid by the developer.
Council Member Barton stated that a contract should state ,,.at If
for some reason the developer did not pay the property owners, :here
was then no contract and no condemnation,
Assistant City Attorney Joe Morris stated that Mr, Jeter had been
working with City Attorney Taylor. An agreement between the City
and Mt. Jeter would be drawn stating that bit. Jeter was respor.sible
for the reimbursement to the property owners for the easement
property.
The following resolution was presented:
R 9 S 0 L U T 1 0 N
diIERHAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has riereto-
fore determined the necessity for and ordered the acquisition ~,N• the
City of Uenton of the hereinafter described right, titSe and
interest In the land hereinafter described; and
City of Denton City council minutes
yieeting of 4arch 27, 1484
page -Two
IiHEREAS, the City of Denton has beon unable to agroe and
cannot agree with the owner upon the value of the hereinafter
described right, title and interest in the hereinafter described
land situated in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, now,
therefore,
BE IT R6SOLNISD BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SHCTION I.
The City Council hereby finds and determines that it is
necessary to acquire the hereinafter described rights, title and
thatrittauthorizeeproc.eedingdincEminentaDomaindtohacquiresthecright,r
title and interest in the hereinafter described property,
SECTION Il,
rho Cltyy Attorney of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby
authorized and directod to bring condemnation proceeding to obtain a
drainage easement to the following tract of land situated in Denton
County, Texast
All that certain 20 foot strip or tract of land
Denton,
a nil situtedof in
B. Longbotto~m Survey, Abstract 775,
Texas Ii the said tract being a part of the tract described rived in the
deed tram A. N, Fallis, et al to 'Turner Gassaway,
thcusaid0tractabeing9more part Dlculaflyodoscribedeasofollowstty Terns;
BEaINN;NG for the northwest corner of the tract being described
herein, at the northwest corner of the said Gassaway tract;
THENCE aouth 87°47' east with the north line f f~~ eco said tract and
rner;
along a fence a distance of 20,0 feet to a point
THENCE south 01,055' west 20 feet east of and parallel to the west
line of the said Gassaway tract, a distance of 181.5 feet to a point
for corner;
THENCE south WS 6'37" west a distance of 28`43cteet,to a point for
corner in the west line of the said Gassaway
THENCE north OI'SS' east with the said west link) a distance of 22,75
feet iron rod in theFedeed cfromrJo)cce t`IeadowsthtosRichardrLee
Smith recorded in volume 1019, page 585 of the said deed records;
THENCE no,tlt 01°55' east continuing with the west line of the said
Gassaway tract and along a fence andistance iof 017909,1 (Bean acre of
less, to the place of beginning
land.
In addition to the above described permanent easement, a 16
peeasement rmanent easement, atll as parailel to
on
and peast yline construction
the fuodide t
the attached drawing incorporated herein by reference,
Said drainage uasement covering the above-described land is
sought for a public purpose; the title %hereto to be vested in the
City of Denton,
The aforesaid authorization recognizes the obligation,
imposed by e to pa forttnedexpenseroffprovidingcoff.sioteedrainage
Ridge Estates) ) to y and that said
improvements to serve the development of property
entering into Is Conditioned thatupon thesaid City~l willlpbe reimbursed iEar
e
enterng i
acquisition costs incurred In said condemnation proceedings.
city of Denton city council Minutes
dleetxng of March 27, 1984
Page Three
SECTION 1i1,
This Resolution shall become effective from and after its
date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 27th day of March, 1984,
CITY OF DENTON
ATTESTt
CITY OF DENTON, TEXivS
APPROVED AS TO LBOAL CITY FORAT'1URNEY
C. J. TAYLOR, JR„
CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS
; - -
BY
Barton :notion, Chew second that the resolution be passesubject on
the proper contract agreement between the city eJ the Ba dreton "aye" ,
the reimbursement of costs. On Rti,ddlosperger "aye",
Hopkins "aye", Stephens ,aye". ,
Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart Potion :urried unanimously.
With no further di!teusslon or business, the meeting was adjourned,
ATL'HrTit4~lt'l'-';TAYr~"r
L'ifA pj~' "L~LC , , CiT SECR T KY
lSJ1C
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
ResidentW Remodels COmmel;Clal
narch 12,1984
City Of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
ATTENTIONt MR. C. J. TAYLOR
REFERENCEt Oak Ridge Estates Drainage Easement
Dear Mr. Taylor=
During the past two months, T, have contacted the two laand nk owners
adjacent to the north east corner of the proposed
Estates. An effort has been made to negotiate a surface drainage
easement with both parties.
As of this date no agreement has been reached due to the
exorbitant prices demanded by the owners. Mr. Ralph Nations, the
owner to the north of the subdivision, will not sell the 16' wide
200' long portion of land required for the referenced easement.
However, he will seal the approximate 1/2 acre bounded by the
north side of the subdivision and the south side of the small
creek dividing his land for two finished lots in the subdivision.
This is a minimum of $21,000 for the 1/2 acre or $42,000 on a per
acre basis. It should be noted that only 1/2 of the land (1/4
acre) he has offered to sell is outside of the current flood
plain.
Mr. T. F. Cassaway is the owner of the land to the east of the
proposed subdivision. He has offered to sell approximately .37
acre of land to accommodate the referenced neasement approximately 102000E
or an equivalent of $27,027 per acre.
the .37 acre is outside the flood plain.
t8'17)332.2165
2414 Jacqueline Denton, Texas 76201
1 ~ Ie', jl~
1
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
Residential 1 Remodels 1 Commercial
The land in that general area has sold for $4,$00.00 to $6,500.00
Per acre (all out of the flood plain). The closer to Loop 288,
the more expensive the land becomes (up to ;12,500 per acre).
However, the land in question for the referenced easement is
worth only a small fraction of what the owners are requesting.
Based on the above information, I am requesting that the City
of Denton intervene in the establishment of the referenced
drainage easement through formal condemnation procedures.
Sincerely,
Jeter
93oe
' (317) 382.21F,5
2414 Jacqueline Denton, Texas 76201
e
City Council Minutes
April S, 1994
The Council ChambersInto the special called meeting at $too P.M. In
yIBJIBBR5 Mayor Stewart; Council Members Alford, Barton,
PRBSENTi Chew, and Hopkins
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
UMBNRS player pro Tam RlJdle.sparger was to Washington,
ABSBNTi D.C. testifying for the Trinity Improvement
Authority
Council Member Stephens
1, The Council considered adoption of a resolution regarding
funding for Flow Memorial Hospital.
Mayor Stewart read a letter from County Judge Buddy Cole regarding
the County's position on the join t uofithesermflow Hospital, This
letter is attached to and made a part
uponcby tlriv County stated a
the Cityeandulieocould note seer thatu the agreed the explained ti%o changes to Judg hCole'se11statement ine theoletter that a
Referring
joint meeting be called Be to review the hospital's five year plat), loms stated partios hew nconcluded
thesCounty nutawouldcvote on theooriginaltresolutionlas presented. by
talk ,teabar H''teate Cwas In ouncil a that
talk ttie
tal had taKen place and felt the
original resolution.
Council Member Stephens joined the meeting.
Mayor ;itewart stated that the County had already, budgeted ;125,000
for Flow and lie felt that the City had met their obligation, He
concurred that he Council should vote on the original resolution
am
instead of the Council Member Barton stated that the County had never had a five
year plan, The Immediate need which Flo HospiattlthedCouncilrsfunds
also agreed
vote operating original capital resolution,
rile following resolution was presented
R E S O L U _j I O N
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton and the
Commssioners Court of the Gount,v of Denton have determined to
maintain Flow Manorial hospital as a public institution of the
III host class possible to serve the health needs of the people of
this area; and
WHEREAS, we believe that broad public support is required
to assure its
resourceful hospitalvtooserve alldthe peoplealtand as ' viable and
WHEREAS, we desire to build on the foundation which has
b,aen provided by the sacrifices of tnose who have contributed toward
our goal; and
WHEREAS, a public hospital is necessary to attract the
necessary young medical professionals required to meet the needs of
the community;
City of Denton City Council Minutos
Meeting of April 31 1984
Page Two
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RHSOLYED that we encourage the help
of cItltorts and Institutions in assisting us in providing the
resources needed to support our public hospital!
88 IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we, the City Council of the
City of Denton and the Commissioners Court of Denton County agree
during the coming five year period to support Flow Memorial Hospital
financially as followst
The City of Denton pledges to the Bosrd of Directors of
Flow Memorial Hospital the sum of $125,000 for the supper: and
operation of Flog Memorial Hospital during each of the next five
years.
'the County of Denton pledges, in addition to necessary
funds for indigent care, to furnish the Board of Directors of Flow
Memorial Hospital (he sum of $125,000 for trio support and operation
of Flow Memortal Hospital during each of the next five years,
PASM AND APPROVED by the City Council of the Cof
Denton, Texas, thls the 3rd day of April, iv84,
PASSED AND APPROVED by the commissioners Court of Ccnton
County, this the 3rd day of April, 1954,
COMMISSIONER: COURT OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE
DE1t'rON COUNTY, TEAS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
9907-=, LM1'Y JUDGE-- RICHTRI) . a , b ,
WALLAC`E 6A7EY,` C S C- T. W. RIDDLESPEROT,R
PRECINCT I MAYOR PRO•TEM
SANDY JA COBS, COMM SS 1 LIT-- J0T-r,7-ALTUW, COUNCILMAN
PRECINCT 2
VET7nKLCGOQMISsr6NER--- 7A - BAlIUN,-COUNCILMAN
PRECINCT 3
B. . SWITZER, Si 0NER ?ARK R. CHE"W, COUNCILMAN
PRECINCT 4
CHARLES TfOP~" INS, C C
RCS1 E?HFTdS C,STJhTCTLti ,
ATTEST: ATTEST:
MAtY JO HILL, COUNTY Cl filtA CIARLOT'i'F CLLEN,, CITY SECRB LU,
City of Uenton City Council Minutes
Moettng of Ajril S, 1984
Pago Three
Hopkins motion, Chow second that the rosolution be approved.
Council Member Stephens stated that the public inventment in this
vital lnscitution needed to be protected and he felt the passage of
the resolution would ggive, a signal to the community that the City
Hospital vas Stephens interoste; resolving the ehe financial. problems this at flow
board
protect this complete public Investmen~lan and to take the
necessary O steps to Flow to
n
On roll call vote, aal'ton "aye", Hopkins "aye,, Stephens "ayell,
Alford "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye", Motion carried
unanimously.
Council Member Chew asked to speak for Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger
who was in Washington, Chow stated that Mayor Pro Tom Riddlesperger
had worked very dillgently on the original resolution and had only
the best interests of the hospital and the City of Denton to Aind,
In negotiations with the county Commissioners the W5,000 figures
had been ajreed upon from each ontity with the County rtLll
responsible for the indigent care. Thit• contribution would be
included in the five year plan,
Council Member Stephens asked when this contribution would begin.
Council Member Chew responded this budget year.
Mayor Stewart stated that a committee had not been formed by either
the City Council or tho County Commissioners Court to try to resolve
the reoccaring problems with funding for Plow Hospital. Individuals
had been meeting in an effort to solve the problems, it was the
consensus of the Council that a committee of Council Member Chew,
Mayor Pro Cam Riddlesporger, and Council Member Hopkins be formed to
negotiato with the County and the Joard of Directors.
Mayor Stewart also stated that he would have difficulty in approving
any plan which would require the citizens of the City of Denton. to
pay more toward Flow that other county residents, In order to meet
the hospital's Immediate financial need, he could overlook the fact
that the citizens of Denton would be paying approximately 14 per
capita for the next S years but he did not want to set a precedent
that the City of Denton would pay one-half and the County woulj pay
one-half when a portion of the contribution paid by the County was
raised by taxes collected from the City residents.
Mayor Stewart further stated that he did not believe the County was
meeting Its indigent care responsibility, due partially to the fact
that an exact definition of "indigent" had not been found.
Council Member Stepnens stated that, In Conjunction with various
problems, some of the indigent care costs were created by other
)utunof,
counties government using
would o not spay aland rhthe beCost had toembenepaitd the
operating expenses. Stephens concluded by stating that he would
iiKe to see a report from the Flow Hospital Board of Directors and
the hospital administrator on those costs and would also encourage
the board to complete the master plan,
4ith no further discussion or business, the moaating was adjourned,
RIC'II:iRD UU, J'3f•W1R~1, 'CCYc~RJ
i,I1AT , 4 S l`,FIET I~
14C9C
WALLACE BATEY LEE WALKER
"tC;NCT 1 r t_.]ur;; PnecIwCT 3
181h 464.7410
1 171 3652240 NCl11V1~ ` Rit 11;1;' COURT
Y
SANDY JACOBS B. E. SWITZER
>7 PRECIN Vt 4
~heC1.~CT 2
'21~1 476.37V 18171 482.34'3
BUDDY COLE, JUDGE
SIxiK 11000 JOSIRK A CARROL4 COVRTS 6V14O1N0 401 W1S1 HICKORY 01N7ON FIXA$ 76201 1617fi 111.1212 16171 2$7 1414 Mf TAO 436 1145
I
April 3, 1984
Honorable Richard 0. Stewart, Mayor
and Honorable City Council
City of Denton
215 East McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mayor and Council:
As you know the resolution passed by the Commissioners
Court regarding Flow Memorial Hospital is substantially
different from the original suggestion.
First, we inserted the word "minimum" because either
of us may elect to expend an amount larger than $125,000.
Second, we specifically designated "capital improvements"
because the hospital has obvious immediate needs It that area.
Third, we certainly understand the medicare repayment
needs to be addressed; however, at this point we have no
assurance that any extended payback to medicare would be
acceptable to them.
Fourth, we are in total agreement that there must be
a five-year plan for Flow. But, Flow's data on that is not
quite ready for the Council and Court to consider. If we
say now that we allocate $125,000 per year on a five-year
plan, it is really ba!;ed on no facts.
We suggest that we go ahead with the $125,000 to Flow
as stated in our resolution in order to give Flow much needed
help and show that we as partners are side by side in the
effort.
Honorable Richard 0. Stewart
and Honorable City Council
City of Denton -2- April 31 19$4
Then, we should take the Flow five-year figures and
data and call a joint meeting to begin going over the plan
for the future. Our decisions will then be based on fact
and have substantially more credibility,
Your very truly,
BUDDY COLE
County Ju ge
8C9
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: August 7, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT: BID #9307 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of Electric Distribution
Transformers. These units will replace stock trans-
formers utilized in the maintenance and new construction
of the Electric Distribution System.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Ellect8ric Budget System 0Line2Transformers
RECOMMENDATION: We ecommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
evaluated
Item 1 20 25KVA-PM Cummins Supply 864.00 17,280.00
Item 2 40 50KVA-PM Poleline 995.00 39,800.00
Item 3 10 75KVA-PM Cummins Supply 1431.70 14$17.00
All bids are FOB Dentali with delivery in 12 16 or
18 - 20 weeks,
EX1l3IT: Tobulation Sheet
SUBMITTED 8Y: '
Toni D, Shaw C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
nit)
i_._ X307
nlb _ CIUCTRIC IISiRIBUTION
"AWORHFRS - Cun+u)rrs hricster holelino CSCO GC Supply van trae W. t4.
ohrN Ju emple Oraybar
- 1?,ms.._- Dusenberry i.
ACCOUNT 4
.._6~1_Q08_0,252:4222-,3f0_ I
i'IRN fSRSu, IT TIIN Vf,fitwli VUF1F)U- V[ lGOlf VCfilSi3
V);lffiij (F Vl'fili(Sii Vl;ill~iiCt_.__. r)JUofi___ TfliiGA Vf NfiiSil ,'t:riiKTi
- -
25_kv)1 nab-Fluui>t,___. 933,40_ J}3f 00 _ _8 60
......1014 44_-_ 000
_
-
40 5Q-_kyA nad-HQFrg4___ 7192.3? 1019,00_. _.995,00__. 1109.00,.- 121J.12. 115500 12U1.00 14Y,001030,20
.-i0 75 kvA had Hnuet 141,0.30. X292-Q0._ )26~,(1tL__ 454,QP.__ 150.7,.04_- 1591~.OV_ 1.J81~00-_. 98G,00.__ 1306.,25_
70-Days _ 18.20 Nk I8-2D wp__ 44_UBY5..,_ 1J3 118Y5_ 84.Qays 141 Days_ 40 UaYS.__ 18 20 Nk
Central -
_ s t _ GC van _fealL- Maloney- C COr aw
- -
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING; August 7, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: BID #9308 DISPOSAL OF PCB CAPACITORS
SUMMARY: This bid is for the proper disposal of approximatety
11,235 pound of PCB contaminated capacitors, Thespe
are capacitors that have been taken out of service
and must be disposed of according to rules and
regulations established by the E.P.A.
ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS; 1983-84 Budget Account Number #611-008-0252-9222
Electric Distribution Line Trnasfoimers
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the Iowpst bidder
of Rose Chemical Company in the amount of $.63 per
pound including transportation charges. Total bid.
$7,078.05. The lesser price per pound quoted by S J .D.
does not include $1,670,00 freight charge.
EXHIBIT: Ta elation ,Sheet
SUBMITTED BY; l rl~ .
Toni D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
T
I.SiCi 9308
nzR)pGO DISPOSAL ENSCO ROSE PCB, INC, ED TRINITY RESOURCE
OPEN ~ July 19, 1984 2 p,m, XEBR CHEMICAL SERVICE
ACCOUNT Rl
Q R R5 t D 8 8 MI "1 to~v v'8NDORT -v'E Dom" VENDOR._ EN o 1; O _vi: ,aDO vu;N o11
1 11,235 PCB Capacitors .85 ,63 ,65 .50 ,97 1,07
FOB Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton Denton
Freight Included Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Schedule 30 Days 10 Days 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days _ 10 Days
- i
1
0?. 4, 30
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: August 7, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: BID #9309 ELECTRIC METERS
SUMMARY; This bid is for the purchase of electric meters
equipped with time-of-use registers. These are
speci?.1 application electric meters used by the
Electric Meter and Sub Station Department.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1983-84 Budget Funds Account #611-008-0253-9224
RECOMMENDATION: We reconunend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specifications of Poleline Electric in the amount
of $234,18 each for Item 1 and $345.76 each for
Item 2, Total bid price, $3,133,88, FOB Denton,
delivery in 84 days.
EXHIBIT: Tabulation Sheet
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
i
i1 ► n .....,..,9349..,
)7 rM._ T.w„x.M1M^,K1m/M wY'V„Nr YYM'~•r.,Y.~.HMMM4+Yli~ 4111 1itIJ1A
RIx-OAVIS CUMMINS POLELINE NELSON PRIESTER EMPLE 4fESC0
o1't +Gn . MY ~Q, 19$4 2 poll
ACCOCNIT
l'f \00 JE7 1'I i?~^f Vf;YI)Ok V1 Ni7C1h VIN )
1
1 6 Meter 1 Phase 243,34 1249.60 234,18 1254,00 272,00 82,00 7.00
la Meter 1 Phase Alternate 22,00
2 5 Meter 3 Phase 359,74 369,10 ! 345,76 X375,00 402,00 01,00 7,00
Meter 3 Phase Alternate r 41,00
I
Delivery-_ 84 Days 184 Days 84 Days___; 84 Da s _ 84 Da sw 84 Da s j,3 D~ys
i i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING,. August 7, 1984
COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: BID #9312 TRUCK CAB/CHASSIS
SLIM14ARY: This bid is for the purchase of two 40,000 pound
GVW truck cab* and chassis for the Electric Distribution
Department. One unit 'is a scheduled motor pool
replacement. The second unit is replacing a truck
destroyed by fire, Both of these trucks will serve
as carrier vehicles for the hole digging units.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Unit #5240
1983-84 Budget Account Number 11,218.96
Motor Pool Replacement
Account Number 720-004-0020-8707 8,505.04
Insurance Payment 10,000.00
Unit #5241
1983-84 Budget Account Number 229274.00
Motor Pool Replacement
Account Number 720••004-0020-8707 7,450,00
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
bidder meeting specification of Bill Utter Ford
in the amount of $28,908.00 for the gasoline powered,
units. We also recommend accepting the optional
12 ply tires at $816,00 per truck. Total bid cost
$59,448,00,.
SUBMITTED BY:
Toni D, Shaw, C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
G3u 'r3'~'t,~; -.Tgl)_C.K.. AL MCNATT BILL UTTER HUDIRCRG iAHANEY GMC
CHEVROLET FORD CHEVROLET INTERNATION DALLAS
0 FN r. 1)
ACCO;>;'r 0
_
~V1: I1Ol~t V1;\1)03 _ Vl? KY, En VG~DOR V~~I)Ok VEND0 VF:\pOlt
k Truck CWChassis Diesel T NB 1371995,00 t 4~ 0 926.15 X40 974.00 146J69.00
1 2 ,
2 ! 2 Truck Cab/Chassis Gasoline 33,498,00 `[28,908.00 35,926,'15 N8 NB
Delivery Item 1 120 Days Stock 120 Days Stock
Delivery Item 2_ W ' 120 Days j 120 Days 1120 Days.._ 90 Days
t '
Option for 10:00 x 20 12 Ply Tire 816.00
0~.10~71 j
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY S11EET
DATE OF MEETINGt August 7, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent Agonda
SUBJECT; Bid 11 9313 Water Maters
r
SUA4MYt This bid is for the purchase of the annual supply
of water meters. The meters are purchased as
warehouse stock and charged out as needed. Quantities
vary according to the need of the City of Denton.
The bid is firm for one year with a one year renewal
option.
ACTION REQU MM Approval by Council and award of bid.
SOURCE.' OF P'UNM Working Capital Warehouse Inventory account number
710-004-0598-8708
RECOMMATION: We recommend this be awarded to the lowest bidder
as listed:
Neptunet Items 1, 4, G, 7, 8, and Section B
Badger t Items 2, s, 5
1"XIi1BIT: Tabulation Sheet
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom D, Shaw, C.IT
Assistant Purchasing Agent
BID ~ 119313 T
b7p Water Meters
01) Rockwall Badger Neptune
ACCOUNT # 1 ~
A QT zT1 M D C.'RI TIO V OR
EN OR
V1; DOR ENDOR V ND R VENDOR
_ Section A. NEW METERS
2500 3/4
w~T 125 1~~ _ _28,9 _ 21.90 1,50 _
59.5 4 50,50
15(1,5 138,24
+ I50 n~, _ 146.00
212,5 188.33
5 8 3 183,00 -
1' _
838 10 835.00 ` 840`00
6 8 4,1
1460.0 1285,00 1210.00_
7 611
2880 , 0 2450.00 2375 , 00 -
8 12 M I NB NB 3&4,00
Section B, TRADE-IN JUNK/SALVAGE METERS
1 5/8" 3/4
3.50 3,50 5.00
7,00 5,50 -
3` l 1/2" 7 - 9,00 -
4 4 2„ - 12,00 12.00 15.00
20 , 00 18 , 00 2 5 , 00 -
~ A7
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SIIEKT
DATE OF MEETING: August 7, 1.984
COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM 11; Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: Purchase Order 11 64152 Saf-T-Mark Supply Co., Inc.
$3,690,00
SUNIDIARY: This emergency purchase order is for the purchase
of reflective lane markers and non-reflective line
markers for the marking of Ridgeway Drive. These
markers, white and yellow, are necessary and need
to be installed before the opening, of the road for
traffic, The request was received as an emergency
with the necessary attnclted memo. Saf.-T-Mark Supply
Co., Inc, has been the lore bidder in each of the
last few bids for these like items.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council,
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 510-002-0010-9105 SAFI
REC 011 NDATION; We recommend this emergency purchase order to Saf-T-
Mark Supply Co., Inc, for the necessary material for
Ridgeway Drive in the nmount of $3,690,00.
EXHIBIT: Purchase Order 1164152
SUBMITTED B1':
John J. Marshall., C,P,M.
l Purchasing Agent
218 E MaKINNEY ST, PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201
P. 0. NUMBER 17ATENENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPE
6 ZI1 : /i14 cut ; 41
iAF'~~.JO1
VENDOR; SHIP TO: 41
;hf -T~;•!A;i( JU,Ji'LY CC14* INC»4 CUNIRAI. F2c.C~:1V1Nia 44
PoOo LWX 4026
Cl,tll ls;hlAl'iCIN ONLY 4t
TYL.:.'~ 'I'X /'.~rlw UU Nu1' UUNLLCATL 4i
4k
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, LINE AMOUNT
01 b1 n )J~: U01 o b.4pj (l1 0f; 1 J')J P•-117 YLLLt7'a 0E FL LAi4L. MARKt-R s 01 v•00
U, F510 L;0": Oulu i.0.1 91US IIIUu P-7 Ye.LLUI': LXN,i. WAlti<iFi U:1J40J
' i
tj 1!
%dud
I IAL. F I~.il. 0'-] U 0.) 4.
The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20.
Reference P.O. Number on all BIL, Shipments and Invoices,
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated,
Send Involces TO: Direct All Inquiries TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing ,;pent
215 P. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
Phone 8171566.8223 817/566.8311 DIFW Metro 267.0042
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
a..
004 070
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMARY SHECT
DATE: OF NESTINGt August 7, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #1 Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: Purchase Order 11 64197 Group Graphics
$3,597,00
SUMARY: This request was received and then sent out for
quotations. Wt reccived quotes from two vendors
who were capable of doing r!iis job, They were the
vendors who had prevl,,usly printed the Brochure.
The quotes were well under $3,000.00. Before the
brochure could be printed, the department chang,ad
the paper to be used and added to the quantity.
This increased the price to $3,597.00 which was
the lore quotation by Group Graphics,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council..
SOURCE: OF FUNDS: Budget - 100-003-0062-8101
RECOb MI)ATION: We recommend this emergence purchase order be
approved to Group Craphlcs for the printing of
the Parks & Recreation Fall Brochure in the
amount of $3,597.00,
EXHIBIT: Purchase Order !1 64197
SUBMITTED BY:
John J. N1i84 h all, C.P,PI,
Purchasing Al,ent
215 E, MoKINNeY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 7=1
P, Q, NUMBER DATEIVENDOFI NO, DOOUME3NT TYPE,
64 ` 07/ 19/.34 C.1)4 S
VENDOR: GFtUfit aJ o SHIP TO:
GRUUP UN'APNI(,;3 PAicKS r: NE HItATIUN
101 AVENUd A CONFIRMATION ONLY
DEENTON, TX 76201 00 N111' OUNI.1CA1E:
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, LINE AMOUNT
1 100 00i 01)6'd W 01 29500 1984 FALL UROCHURL 3059 7.0U
y
TOVAL FUR P*O& 7.00
The Clty_of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt - House Bill No, 20,
Reference P.O. Number on all B/L, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indlcatod,
Send Invoices TO: Direct Alt Inquiries TO:
Clty of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P,M, Purchasin-, Agent
215 E. McKinney St,, Denton, TX 76201 Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
Phone 81715668223 817/566.8311 DIF01 Metro 287•Crj?',
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
~l r( N
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: August 7, 1984
COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM Consent
SUBJECT: P.O, #64240 J,S, EQUIPMENT CO, $4,843.00
SUMMARY: This emergency purchase is for the repairs of our
equipment #2500 (Solid Waste). This is for the
repair of cab, transmission train steering, and air
conditioner. This request was received for the
emergency purchase of repairs from the Vehicle
Maintenance Division,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase order #64240 to
J,S, equipment Co, for the emergency repairs on our
equipment #2500 in the amount of $4,843,00,
EXHIBITS: Purchase Order and Invoice
SUBMITTED BY ! X"'` ez ! r e l.._c.__
John J.MarshalI C.P,M,
Purchasing Agent
CITY r TEXW
215 E, MaK1NNEY ST, PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 7WI
P• 0. NUMBER DATEWENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYPE
6414U 07/ 10/64 C14 S
VENDOR: JJJ59boo SHIP TO,
Jw S I--'UUIPME?NT Cc* VEHICL,G MAINTE.NANCI:
602 WIL041F1E PARKWAY CONFIRMATION ONLY
GRANO PflA.t ft l k 9 TX 75 050 DU NOT DUPLICATE
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS ~NUMBER DESCRIPTION 910 NO. LINE AMOUN'
01 710 OU4 Ob9b kJ?IU I M25oo REP CAO# TRANS* STP AC 4*843*00
TOTAL FUR Patio 4oa43*OO
The Clty of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. t
Reference P.O. Number on all 81L, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated, t- ` =f - °1
Send Invoices TO; Direct All Inquiries TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C•P.M• Purchasing Agent
2,15 E. MoKInney St., Denton, 'T'X 76201 Tom D• Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasiing Agent
Phone 8171566.8223 8171666.8311 D1FW Metro 26710042
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
18 equipment lervice Inc.
602 Wlldllle Parkway
Grand Prairie, Texas 75050
214126?•021 I or 262.0212
I
City of Denton Invoice Nn. 1524
Deft:
r^ 1
')enton, 'r$3Xa!3 76201
Model) l Serial No ~ ¢No, Authorized By CU31 No.
v'at 9l 11_j, 8760 / C. 00
Description,
Lrr:It L.I(";;IIcot• 4AC'Cring (rime 10-11(" rllnr~- 1)oro::. ~ lt' ~~lOt;l C~L2:1.'~F3 .itGLC". .'1f
R :and. .1 mrib~ ro,i,)L.ice cab r,tount:i.n/; pad t, tt.llcl :t.n u:1.L1ti.on
nut aul „orvi cc.d Lt:i.,.r Coll 1't-" W.021cr
Romove(! 'mur -)An:i.onnt renlcicod one ~ttr -o:ln:i.on arl!i cligo
id+~oe:~.].c;c ,_,tr:nr:E.nr; rele~loe 1xi,,~,i.on❑ c:in~a czo~»hui't,
Re;;:.r:ircd. trttnsltli.tl,~~.ono1). leo.k
7?(;;~e ta.ed. both hol.et cylJ.nde:rti
Rc"' ace. trun tlnl.sc,~on muct:ton to ntll;;~~ chanGoct mi not:i_c, ocreol.-
cIvanrect tranorn:Losion falt:~r
Lrxbor (1111..5 hro. roe;* oho.p time) + 'r'8620 50
G_.. l 372.50
Parts 1606000
'Vi'a.; 11!C-111_']
L) LL 1LF31} .00
- -~NOTrcE" Irivoices are payable within n0 days. ! hero WN be a 1112 % inivresi chaigo addod to past due Invoiced,
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
PACE('-UP RUMMARY BHFET
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Barister
Addition
SUMMARY: This is a 0.3926 acre parcel 2ocatcO adjacent and
wost of Fry Street between Scripture and West
Oak. The property is zoned multi-family (M'F--1)
and multi-family redevelopment is anticipated.
A two--story frame residence and detached garage
currently exist at the site.
Adequate streets, drainage, electrical, gas and
telephone facilities are in place. A 61' sewer
main is adequate to serve this site, but an
existing 411 water main must be upgraded to a
minimum 6° in size to provide adequate service.
Plans for water line improvements must be submit-
ted before final plat is approved.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval with the condition that adequate plans
for public waster in accordance with the City of
Denton Subdivision Regulation and Land Develop-
ment Code be submitted before final plat is
approved.
ALTERNATIVE: Approve preliminary plat with or without
condition
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
David Ellison
Senior Planner
06959
I I
f I ,1 IIArt of two 1
COWn or MN1ON 1
41
- ' - VN111u. YI. KAROO 1. XOM AM "Rol 1. Nut, I11,ul IN
NML - - 0" It W A 1,1010 44" 11101 IN 1111 Al. rut1AL1111 Ulttt,
0,1411KI NA, Cln Of 141 At SAO CWNn 01 WWI, MAU, Air
MI&I ut W A 001t111 WLM •1170) OC4 llIACt AS K6414944.0 10
A 440 f1011 POP I. OICJJT f0 V.A• /AR, rOVt}to 100 TOO OM awa
IOA !1041, W iM I/10 MI Of IWCI, 1144 /ICOIM6 '.P, 1VIIrt
1 1fµ! 041 401, NIO OIC/Wt, AM It11U ALLM A! URIA, (LULU'
II.M I ACIf MCI AL 691:1144V 10 1 KU /x111 KA 11 JMO, CA44t it
PONAU 1. 4LOII "I YAM 1, WIIA, 111, 00 1116 IAIN, wl W
VKW Yy kbp NAKY, 1144 IICo0M1 t0 VOIVkI 114, JA4I an, 4410 UC40M Of
MI U04 tAIO CWOtf AM KIM 11011 )MtICWMLV 44KNII9O At 114UA",
' IIOIWIw At Mt MYSNtut to1N/ of NII cmt mut a.. 01:'6 µP
10 tit VIH /1011r•01.OAY Or 111 IHJAtl
IuWI IOVII 0 MGMII 04 NI1M10 to 1LC1MM tut "l w, lU
Vtlt 11011-00-AIAI 01 Ill $"Ali 1lilt Wtl 01 10O.W Fur, It W
lop plot
• - ' f TWIN3 1OV11 to MOUt$ Al kIMAI$ 10 IICOMi Mt A 01LIS H:1 OI
I71.61 rift TV u IIW fill
Ih O f Foso FM itlKf A*" 00 blout1 10 KI WItI " tire*$ Cut 1 1-ut1AM:1 01
64-49 '4 10000 flit t0 N IOW 1111
l'OIAWQ MF•1 A , n to LOCO PRIM It 0901410 40 NIIVtu JO IOCOM tAll A n1111Y44 (V
b I I I ..i KU{ 0011481 10 too 101010111011MIW1 AMO tMI1111N, O.)lll
y, LAW
Ngr rnod
, 111144 KM IPtA11D1I INY tNttl Ma Of tusk potill"ll
Y.:,.Ar, ilnl '
. , , 11161, VI. NOMAD 1, WVU A" 0"0T 1. Nr/1, 111 to nluJn YWl
001 LR,,v*. FM Ow AMARA FM 1911 M^ MIICOA11P0 IM IIUTA MfCOl110 IIL Lilt L LVI Mt
}a~
SIB•g9 I 11,72.78 ILM I, Of fit 1,41111(1 AMItIW t0 1O1 City ur nAlml, rjul,
IW ry 4
IM. APO 00 1110111 0111CATt 10 IAL tuILIC 011 1011911. Ilk Ol U111 444
I. OT CW ~ ILLlx/0L1 AWMO Mlldl,
Y~
BLOCK I ~4Y1 zaLMOMl
_ta«~rctwl.
"C ItAn Of Itu1 u
(0U0n or nit" At
YPddl kAO1nt,FN
j . I I I f;. • , ' Itro" IRA, 4116 YIMIAIGNIO WTUI MKIC IV AW too MT) c WrT
e•a TO z I AM tt4n OM nil 041 PIWIALLt 61114140
03926 AEgES J rFwP 10 to at of * AM YAOL! 91, tO P M -ivis I-1,'. -i
~~A.. HIMO c," 1:6nadvm . 10/IG01W 1IR1 tILMl OI, AMP KIJIW LIA:tP t 1x1I .1{f (tm" I
(tNn
FiY>•' IA., 11![04441 - 1i•2J•Ty tltlvtt0 Mt IAMJ NI TOO PVOVDIt IMP 001144LL1110/; MIf IA
.a, IM MVMAM~ tttltllt0. AND IM MI CUACl11 TILLEIN IIAIIOI
Jv' $94~I 171 r f . 1 CAIN Milk M M41D AVID sm Of Wr1CL IM
A DR al
4 11.1C1 1 11.-
Jack 01111't , FAA 1 N010
If 8?•1,O I I tvvlM*V ItM *I
plat , bl%NV u01LG ibiiii'A1iLit"id-ARO'ioi'wxiii 'ccw:n:
20PAH0 AN•I ~v 1 ott*vmo MPlad
y !r JUIVt101'I CtIr111Citt
3 ` I" T11U1. AIM 11 tWL /t1Ji NtAI
I~ r
J f iNU, I, CAII V. PANNtn, AIIUIIILD t1011A1R`41 311MVIL4 N
I'•J(1 OIILtt CAltlll HAT 1 WIMP 11111 ?LAI If11 4 .1.!0141 AAo
01441':-fit. tA1 t♦EH'FlAFitlY DQ.I411E ACCuutt WAVl1 01 lot LAIRD. AND MAY tit If" 1191 144 , Im AAOM
6gt11 Std/ S o"ST STAIf BANII BLDG Plll tLAC1D UM444 111 Jf110MA1 AOItAV111W IN iIum"u fln IOA
Of'llldf.IEfcAS 16M 010IPANct/ 101 tit city of KPr".
HE
U ARIES IN TLilly
6Y %Y1i,OJ. 4 AV. v W. 6; !.'o rv.0r O!' I lilt Kill ((IN TEXAS
WO1l Oak A' Ft•Y,
MIMIMUM FIMISN FLOM rom Now CONITp1.14f10M.011111.00 ,4.474: '-rjG("-"'
CITY QOUNCIL AGENDA
PACK SUM?tARY BHIST
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of Bellaire
Heights, Phase I
SUMMARY: The proposed replat of Lots 15 and 17, Block C,
and Lots 1 through 5, Block D, Bellaire Heights,
Phase I is designed to correct an error in dis-
tances and bearings shown on the original plat.
No public hearing is required because state
statutes provide that it is not necessary when
the intent of the replat is to merely correct
errors, Adequate streets, drainage, utilities,
and other public facilities are in place,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the final replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Approve final replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced final replat
David Ellison
senior Planner
0711a
SIII I oil IlN
111 l"111 111 10 1 11x1 ,
I'.P PIA1 11, q, sl nU lol'r~, I1. 1. 1'm mrr' of
(ri.l Ip 1 it( l 'f 1011,11
f11 C hU I l r l nlU 1 'n
IJPI 15. too tk , , I , 'I! I rlll ri f I.1'd i' IIr 11
e1 1,SC1 .yn rl Ib, In 10e C t. It".' I Unb y 1 lalle•
is ul n r n
P. It 411 t I'll IS Ari`ei rr -ell rte I•n t hu ' .I I 'U.1"01. [1
,,till rdAll lou III `11 n^d IV, f I ,
. 1111 n 011. I to
II Il iI n - 1 1.1ld fount
III 5. 1 'rl 01 Idlt1.1 elr n, Ihn is p rut m.l
,~a7 RI,I l l.r t' ul 11'r rPU II 1ho said hut , f Irnen hril, ro r' 1na1 ,lv Uu1
15 m 1I, II .'11 4.1.11 91i1 Ind thl' Intel tecI I t rr Ir•t, ""I",
e. I, r.. II bl '1 r
'l a 111 loci nl BH iu Ire rII" . IrU on.,, 1+. I OR ,d Inl,
I II, EU11. Nolih It, d1•'•I eel y ..loot r,
R'rlhl•dtl 1'I,•Prt "f ll.l1 Ire! !Hn
r+
1'I 111 riIC S„,fill ll+. i f 1'. tl Pin I • Il'n ,,,n14f u• I r -
tLl~ , E l :iul'l ll r,' Ilt1. 1 1
Co.. `111 It ll .I, '11'•Ild. if
.I'•1 M1 Irp1
uu fr1., ,4 al t an I u'
nnlnl rur I!'1• I , nh
1 1111111:L Ill o 1 fool l' I I nln 10 ❑ n rr'1
+111f1' F.. if' U du IrP1051 rir Ol r!. 1 1 1 J r. Ir,
1 1 1'111 droll ill lully
11kA1f0l MAI! 5 7NI l' i 111 11 11 Irll Ill Iht iLul 1 r'nm
NI IY I.I 111 INo l r IIa IU 1 i1t 1 Ilnl llnll 1 t
I Ap Intl 11''npl 111 III C.I t, nUl r 4 i r I 'o I
1 1 Ir.1nn .I 1
1 I I, 11111 f. Fill In lrr •41 111 I'da.r 1 in , 11 Ir r Vii, ,
I,f }111111 ln. llltl
M 1 I'1 II ll' d •I
. VIA~141A{ 51IWI[1 A•1442 ~ n 11 11oe
H 1, hrllnilt rIrld .I w,I
1 1 _I- _L AIIt,h,~1.1 II AM I I If d +II III yr
I(` •a~,- 1 IIP lnltllnr u N
t'C1. {,,fill I 1 10 dl,r Oct I.(n I II Pell
II Y 111 II 141 r11 U
r IIIp, M1I
INNaI Cnlnel :If III, '~l ,I„ ail ,r
\ / 1 1 \ / nuV i
5 r tilt kf V'. Arulh A9 dl1'rte, A n!nm rr +,A Iron,',
I 1 \ ~ 1•'11141 I. 14,1
1 .1 IL 1 it fY1 l to I t nr Ild I,- ,t
,fill 1 (,.t nl-
/ 1 l / 15 11 EIU' Nor 10, RV JI, Iles SS n1pilot ! a n err ud' i , I 1 Ire,
viii l 011v In Ile Iatp of Irr {nnlr,
:4 Nolic 151 1{r,11 r1' ' ill.PICO' 11 . f 1hn rr•t, it , r n, parr r
6 I[ I1 1 - 0
- 1 i
tltlinlin11u151., 1'if~'~II 'rtl'', I•,Ik
ri R I 1 , \ re 1 r ' r ,I,
/ > I \ I el.ht 0 `~11 till tt IRl{ICNI ~leldhf,f plot pf
y( t _ _ ) it, .Y.r ,.qr,
Uiplnt, nd
y L _ _ J * ` ~.1 ' `u a
GINM( AI an 1rl,n told a% flit Ihle .lr I I,,,, .,r , I ,11 is ln1
r Nl 111 no' f All dirt fuel For el-' + r.l r +,l, IF 111 " I I •II„
I `.~J \LS -4- lydolE -1 Y • L~~ ~~u~-- TI I EI GC Net IN Av kl,yrcea 55 nJnlit to 1 '1 alt ,ml
tO I', IR 1.•,~ r Ir1,lr,10 I So, off stop
Goo • , NPat Pil 11111'1 11 I,nn Ind for III rrr llr lrv pl I t I~(~ , OR 131 WCI SOIIIL II to IVol 11, Ir n IIIJ 11 In
nl ,
' al II M. O~ to t1l tut nrr nl Il'Ir
C 0 _1 tS: tlul tJ lot 1f LIIS 1l 11~ H If IJ M b
~ e " del'irY55 rlnul,a WI11 1 J Pill hen ed.
h
0 Ivut1 nu Irun red.
flit 111 e9 deft ex I9 maul to 11 secma Bert t1 10 1,tj nn 0 IN b0 oo* d rest r0rnvr 01 Lot 5.
C III rth A9 drPl era 211111104th li aernnJ, I:P•1 bh.0 Jett. no 141 'I'm 0, ,
It b ' to rner 01 Lor A,
l f WALBfR A^a[/,1 I 1 1 $uUlh 69 dYEl ilea 7A hirlul Yl Oe alrunds rat n!) P !tllIn I,"'rr . 1,'. rl,r,1,•.,,
I. e W
16A2M ~AO RIOCg C Rlt)CN 0 ti 'For d'~ t eol rner Pf Lrrt 11
y~ e ri 1 I TCC Ne, Nfirth 89 J14'rren 41 ulnUI r• I''1 are cinch 0, 11, ,m, I ~
vSl PM OR C"I of Lilt t And N1110 69 JPl•rr Pa 'It mll,ulr- I. 1, ndr 40.1 , 1 1r1'. .,I+ tl.'r
tAlralpet,SIVP 110N red, Ihr tnathlval rornel of L,rt on Inr re•1 l lo, of nullnit, n•,I
'S
11111
0(XAI1 5[i lr C,Iretl ofis{ 1
vet J r'I ,,n frv+l n,.
, NNC Na
IEr tl thh I 7 fret In I", nlnrr
Will, INIIA I I' OA I., Wise %11, Id'r: A5 111[51. nNl'Stl'Rt
that. L'r1r Un Iltrnrs, Ina d.,Ya licit 0, •dnp, III han„Inr rln' :m 1,1 fir!! i'
do.,i l4W trnel,, as i llnflr 1101,111'
I 1111Ulgtl 5, Alor1 0, CI la and fMimi ' LI (lr„ rn, teen •:d ,I,.~, I',
r.nrrtl Ind etAOmvlttr Inr the Willi, I, me 1, nl,.n
L'r'. ti~h 41
IINAI FIAir 0C IENAS b, I,hn r.
►LAi COMM UI BI'.N1nN ,
13ELLAIRE HEIGHTS o e1 A,fO•e me, (lit UadelslnArd Ilatlre I'uhltc 111 a1 d t,1 snl~ Il,lnn ,I r.
JAV rers0llnlly Arpea rcd ,Inhn Cola M'n kunsVr 1„ mo 1 hr the r 'ne, nnntr II, e•.
SCALC 1.1100' Pfl $ O21E 192e EON t10M19 INC. Wllhcrlhfd h
Ir, the ("ItilM lust..I nl auJ ail mes lednrd II mil pill, hr
r%Ittr1eL the
APRIL IJ, 1904 420 e, Catskill mild anae ";I'll It+e rtvl,I And conrldernt l I'( Iherrln rt1•rrta ed. nud ~•nr ,.:ry,dt 111 tluul
nxr Of. IleA eltnl (RCPL AI erlll 0 al Ate'I LO1S IS IM It, aLOCK Cl OmWn, Tin }1101 Clvrn und01 n1 !laud .,,d ceAI ilf nf(lor, n'I' wo.
Jno ,1f I"A.
/ad In" r Neagh 01 fil 01
at r1e.ICIN L, Cook C, top I'll PR.OC.1.
CHIP a CIrnC1 of DOM". Met Rrl,i i FiL11i '(i, 7jjId Fill
,nolr
M 104CNUM SVRYCN A'1412
llI 1.111r;N cl, All t will 11.
Zhu L 'It"Ve1' nl'n it, full.I cwlll t, j Pn1'al of Chia sl art rnnl
-'IUIM oil rMINHtI And me lltlrilnty nh rl' PI 1'r In nd ar,r rh.,l if., (1.m I9• '.1 ,nu„ rMr•1 -~elf e1, Cell ulli
a
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE August 7, 1984
SUBJECT; Approval of the final replat of 1.he
Haywood-Jester Addition
SUMMARY; This 0,583 acre tract is zoned commercial (C)
and is located adjacent and north of Smith St.
between Dallas Drive and Johnson Street, The
intent of the replat is to establish a one lot
resubdivision from two existing tracts and part
of lot A, block 1, Rainey Addition,
Water and sewer facilities are in place (811 and
611, respectively), Smith Street is a public
street by prescription (40 feet in width). Five
(5) additional feet of right-of-way are being
dedicated by the replat,
ACTION REQUIRED; Approval of the final replat
RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the final replat.
ALTERNATIVE; Approval of the replat
ATTACHMENT; Reduced final replat
0 ui I I
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0569g
;lY 811111(~M *"dNr .I' I ,~+,;tl ell ;It ~~51"1~
F 14164 I alto IdOr I Hu
ST11TL Of TWS
r, u11tY n0, OC'rlltt
I111:RG16, foul Hnylr"'.J and Tan JtstAr .Ire the r,metr of
(ullavr,
Alts FeWitl" MOTION at liq tract of IAInL ' 11#0111 JeeCrlhed
lGl a OtA 16 .111 that CertnlH fAl ere Irnet ue nslCel of INIJ 1t(Lp(tlJ III L.a
b tu Vy,
,Ihlt act Na•her I'1 Au4 beln• the rant tract U( IArW AA It 011ttt on u,nItAI rII .ruSu,J tlterrl•
ed ~n trV (011m lnr three Aarcelo,
• d Fort n Ia+t I lluct, 1 or the Aro r. nut J~not C. A+1nrY Ad,Ilttonn rnoorJeJ In
6b,CL J, n.IFe I) 19at met"
tr'Jt at DentFn olNlt Y, tetAt,
Y ,"l Dol I 1 nl a tract Conveyoi to T. 1., LAr(en;t or it, recur Jed In 2uluu,e )p), !,Alto
A111 Jl riCirdi 04riant CutinlY tAAatl
1 ^•Y`1•_ 6111, if I IRecurds Dental to Not b.TAe iO,' J1 Iecu(J" In Votauna 6)d, pA6a
Obl11. A JAhtT LINt/tY AOOfAyI and beinr rnrA nATtkuLlrly Je1rrILAJ As (nllm.t,
9 LOT I hyrinnln^ Al I I" r/hay fount for !hi, toulhoAtl Curvet 'I( LI"a ttscr .t cfir su Ulherest
five 1), Fie Ili pit 0,n uer ~+f 1 troCt cnn'.a vrJ b~ diet 1u C.9. 0t lnnn, et u4 0,r cn rJlJ In vnlJUnt 6
LOr 1 !LOOK 1. OcIJ v11 1I plutnn Cnunt r, ilxar, Fait " TeX, I: In lho horrF rlynrn•n(•Nay ne
U STOR p4,
' Ai R"Ilh ,tiRtV t'.
l
MINI WAR"W$tS ' •-•••--r---_,...._ IMnt' 9nnlh ,9n Je„ t
V qk1 ►179 y~ - 119. It foes to an Iron erln (Or tt l,e luul N't ttCOI nor d{hth Is llrac I, •116' r dlNAnct of
9 /A. Y
g x >3 ! Il.ence lnrth n0 deaetre. !6 nln tee 06 seconds l:tel A distance of ?17 )s it,, to An Irun
A+ln (n0, If,e nnrthveCt C~'roer oI this <rxet, Bold Pln it In the Inne s
r outh elc.Atnf•
r^,t. OrN 8 t.1, OTtri N!1 r,. ''•I' n( 9lthardann Sltrel nhich lige haen al,tn Jnnl J;
' O 1419 At Nl1 w V. 444 0111; .Feuer Nur. A9
' eIlsl c 39 nl ee 40 s L'a.et A distinct Of I'D ,x0, 'tier to in Itun
I "ln (u0, the nor lhJe.l tattler of ( this (rraiccti
e
via # ,1. 6luctlt nil'Ith nn dw'rcet 71 Firm, we JO ettorldt last a III Al ante of III, 74 '1 set la point of
,,wo"ernCArICN 1101 h,If 1
M 1441• a II Iy '
IF ww 16 . I &OPPMO new 0N611it"640 , . 'V'1. THERf: 1041:, KttUl! ALL 1111 AY tIl[SC P SENTS:
' - _ )NAT. P.m) Lan„wd AhO T," Jester Jo hereby ajopt this PIAC Jtolpif luA cnr ion, Denton herein die 1.
crlhed nrr•~lri• 5t Ia•t I rollick 1 HAy„d.JA,ter 1d4te ton to lh! ct. of Derision, Dennn
r;nunty, hc.u and do hereby dedicate to 04 puhl lc u% the rtrettA t•aaunent! IIWvn
t Iherrrn
Tull JAIIlr
"IAIL fit' fl'.A,19 'i
r. ,A A0,; aril re, 1'1e unJ rtH abut Ju l:,nrlty w1 Ihle JAY Alty p
,aye Ilit to •+e if. be t11r nertn a the f o " Ire pour. d4 And 4 6n,sw.
1'.40,04 h, n n uhute nine IhtJ t o the or enlnA erAton C red expres
' e slut he etonu 0,J the emltesfofntsCl tthe punvuc ant rnna lJ ratinn 6errlu expressed
t 'n 'I unI In the cl partly Ulerrtn tuteJ.
$CALI 1* 00'
A►RIL te, 1911 1„c J I: yen under ry hand dud teal of office, this ilia., Jiw of
Rrv. JULY 3, 1904 1~ . ~~\JI'
• July to, 0,901
LOOATION MAP
FINAL IK►LAr t"a low' rlo`i iry Publ l` In aiuLYni tl li,ic nl lexii
letnre n0, the outs re irned author I10 0,n thl1 Jay VrsunAl ly AnnNreJ ton Jolter Ltv,vn p,
- JESTER 00017104 r to be the "rnun ' hn+e name I0, eIl scr lhed to tha ("Perot let Intttvtlnt ,nun
HAYW000 err u•wledreJ
LO lie Ihnt he rXecuttJ the 1A.16 for the nutnu.la Arlo Cunslde LAtlnn thet ton arpreterd And
OWM[R6 LOT 1 bt OCB 1 'n the C.mcily therelu bated.
OOD
►AUL NAYN' nlvvn nrnler ny bAnJ AIIJ srAl ur a(flef, 11111 the JnY of
1
AOLL II,VD,
DENY", tit, ?01011 70 t. OAR
rhl71[~_W'-^ NJ(irq Politic
FN W Nt AINNtr ALtk►NOtA HKL YIMV[y A-673
Tn nnJ l~~r titsn ii o('ean
Of NrON, 11 , he"
010, A CtyAlf N INAIM, tins 9URVC1'UR'9 CLHI'IfIGl11:
,
• hai 1. .nv 0,,r ern. Reeletet,-i Puhl 4' .turye orr do heu•b: vomit IIIAL 4 pu ed this
'II At (r,vl In actual lid nrcurate tutee, Ihu land Ind that the • .a .,I!.. qW, 0111 Ile
Itdcrd uhdvr r, „nanndl nu„crsli6m
ww ,4 Hu
` of , 41
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-U#' ~i~
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of Lots 4B 1, and
4A 1, Block B, Teasley Mall Subdivision
SUMMARY, 0,574iacrestin8sizeaandyexMall istingbLoti4Aoof the
Teasley Mall Subdivision is 0.417 acres in
size, Lot 4A is the site of an approved planned
development for a neighborhood Laundromat, The
intent of the replat is to take an additional 50
feet from adjoining lot 4B andatit into
Lot 4A to provide additional parking for the
Laundromat land use. Lot 4B is currently zoned
multi-family (MF-1).
Adequate streets, drainage, utilities, and other
public facilities are in place.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the final replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval,
ALTERNATIVE: Approve final replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced final Y:eplat.
David Ellison
senior plannor
0710a
/ SIATL OE II:MP
LOCATION MAP ~I t'M!NTy or RNTOA
1111 PI:1W I, IIII., 0$11,f0, At IhP 6N101 1 i 114.0 1, ,r 1• II :vl, f1 i'1., 1• ,
1'r lex l/, OLIn:A I," I W r1 l(t'ulled 11 1.1 II P. I II t IP; Olt III, "r nynl to II11
Hot •r .n ..1
;L 1n1icln!I tom pArlnulAl ll ,Ittrrlled I is Atli Ir.u,dr NO II'li
f` N 1
I'llq h4' 00 At the 04.01 htAt rtlrunt' vIII 1nl III 1111 It I!4 B In'er1 4'u.•
Slot( par-it Lt'In4 At ltd' Ifll vl et cl ton of Litt n^I t11 Il"Ili •t.' 16 n', !Intl Of 4'l I/a ,!r hdn
line 4'1 .10!00 br 1+11
-'tTP/ t V'ttM I I.
1 1110 AtV N01 t11 01 de v l7 on ill 19 r'1n VlfNO II ^t •,ahlt I.atl PI,01 Ir11 will, kill, 'lot II•r 4'1 I'..1• 1 tIl
` td 1,A!• 11110 rl .1.100, 1'p I•:, It u, Iron I In 1111 tilt IOl Ill.e At ICI rtl nt.Irld 1„••.
1ller ct refill. 11 dlvn•tt 11 IIIM0 97 ""olds 1lot I17 ,"I it,1 I Ill, tlo• nil tl 11'1 of •',I' r In
- - rot the 11np lhaall n•Ultr o4 1,et 411, it., 1.1c lint" itt I,v,U.tr•. 010 11r1 of I.,, a 41
0. G. HIRAA4$ SURVEY A • W IIN et ssoon. DI Olt -11 to IP AIIIVII'I 14 nerMldl Lest IA. Or fr• 1 PI IA III, Plitt 1111 r1 '
Il /0001 A C1110. •I Lot IAt 011 Al, It,o I'it . Nick lot VI+ tnot l neurt t•( 'I eIN l r' Irk 141. Ihr tA, r• 1.10 1!.1 1 '
I plIY10 Cd\1111.111 ~i0ry111t1 IV,II
1101 r•I c
/ lot. Ir, c 1,1111 11 d , I
Thence AAtth it drynoet IV rluuUn 11 Ivtnhln I.Vol 107. n: 'r,t 1111. Ltr it It I, IIn1 44 I7,•a11_•S+^•^ ...d,r•... 1re,N 010111 ~1' Iti1'0
, 01 Tlltpl I onto , ts!e1: 1 1 I V1 5 torolowit
W0 01
(,I 1i I I FL PHI N% I Ri F 1
A q 4 11101 I, Air 1 nal'hi, 6i QV Irk rl,c 10100 1'001 10IAL rrt 11 11111 10- IIII I•rl t'Ib l,, tl'I II
rJ " 1 1 to lA Ito ' All II FIJI )1"111611, rill' of OOAtU„ :lartnl, 11.1110; It, At, Ill A rip hr 111 1,
Phl.N,011, A I N•pAr1 la aa"it Ni ---A l11e 11000lA anfl 011010 ALI shell. hviom,
t 1 `t ul tin ll NM11
[ I 4 I 0 ST/ At `l e` A A I Oa411f ~rL.SP. j r .I
„Ik ANII 61:IJ'01 I, rIVI -chm I. rl Ar Irv I, Ar! Of IP• S. 1let, 1 tr 011,1 ".II •I
.F B dCK gl ^.ti 0 _ 104111, Irrnr• af.t~i hr I Ill tt ttcol'Ad to 1Al0001 C, 1 tl'. li. , I 1 r 101 Ir,
1 r r I1, lC k1 1 Flt l'J 011011101010 Par I Ic1 LAM 4 141 lit, I,- ~t I I I 1l, IImvrrlt At Irll'•,I•
All
'A Not, 01 0 Ilr0l Anlntl al An 1,,4' I in 001 Ink Ih1 n"•ull"N rep Ill n' 1, 1 411 ph, Ipl t 11 Ire
111' IrW tA*t 41 U, toll^I A Ir lrl'. In tl,r but 41, 11,rtH •of•t A', 110 r~l 1,.I'l,-A, A II 11.. ON
NihulrP 11 meoo Jo I.,II It,' .91 Irut 11 r tha let H A. et 1, U, hnY11i I10 t I
.L u-LONOOiI pi RkY LANE nnn lh! 0000 rl•rill -nl•t ay Ilet ul nn ri it t .
d 101 ! .
1.0 (0101114' API It 4') IA II, IC It L,Inu1t1 14 IAP' I',"r •,t 1. 1 .1 1..tn'. 111
4111 In an Irtm Ili, 10L tut lilt htrloun, r"i.h. el t111 10,., 11,1 nntn Itluu I
10.0010 !01101 P? u.are11 11 A.f nl,1 57 it :r1 t wl ! IL I4'• rv r
,nf)ULLALI£R $URl'CY A lOpl lent 141 n,rthsill :'o1nPf of LC 11 An ht r-, {10010 I<pn I ( I N t11 1• t,.
If. ON lltlanct of Ito 00 frtl l0 a1 111 y it,, II ft11t 00111 al 1,1
e nt,rl of II.[ 41 4',,l Irv At rllO rr two. I tr ! I' t t Oaf! ;u At7rw .kill l
Ihnhre iOVt6 AI fit 'JiLl ! it rlhutnr AI K:r.el0 N.,,Ft 11 f, foot 1'11!' lilt a>nt 11 n,
I
.1.1, tilt ♦'rFl IIn. 01 IA Ili lilt 1 IC all 1., I, 1Ir• (4'1 Ih1 A,rli~rarl rr•.... I•I •),.1 2,,•I
.00 corner or Alld 101 1. Lill, folt All, I,Ih 111 11„ 1. '901, 1J•d r•rl-r4'' 111, r ;•A 'Id.
1
711rnt'f '.11 lh At J,Ql All 46 Flouter 11 errrnnr hrrf 700.00 1,rt I ill, IIn• Pl 'lIle,
IWho •nhY1v 11 no of Iemdood,rl I~ I.AAt 10 the cola! Id lltnlonluo And c„ntmvIA, tI, lr Ir t.
_.9091 n_..
Sit YL OvTNte tun;, 1 lvr11 t1't, I',n1: 01.1 !:11; r ntac n'1s'L1arI
723; S10NLWiL
Of N I ON, I f AAS 16201 IhA1 1, I'AuI Sc uut Icl, do ht1 rl,$ Adupl IhII rePI AI dt it I•In A'SIN r Ihr Irt rt In ue0c,
QQ~~ it Atl ry nlII !'W,II' lotion, I'Ity of Nentrnl Lennn ('tunt%, Tr: A/r AI,` d,• hr M., "I'll A'
~.M fit ' it aItOrlA And 011,•01 nlr 5hfvu hrlven. 1
fAVI SCIWiI(P
2006 900 0 (
L7410h, 1 /11 40% 5 0!010
:I AS f. 4'1 11.001
Comm no urhr4+'.
htlrlf P" Ihr uhdrltlonrd 1101014 e,lhllr II, Anil IM 11I,1 „nntl' All
00100, rr UJA
u1 At- t11rnA !e I! In 1•e Ice lrturo, thrt4' h"i, 11 enl ncrIL N' II Ibt 'u-t1lICr Ir
tllnl ht Itn'ofrJ III. AAnO, I(I I Ih1 I'll IInit VIII Cenl lU r f al 1011 11rIr11'. OYt1051, nn' I, t
-:I 1,11 Imdrr I,, hind and rent no of lice, tills lot .A. of I'.r
fINAI P[PL. AI
n,.
I/ell't'IW LOTS 40 1 P 4A1 BLOCK 8 I 11 .{r a To ti,
ANN 410114 1 1,01, rv., 1ht IIM,I, I Olnhrd 0100 at l' Put Iit In AI„1 f,11 to 11 +th t, 011! IA, ,P I. I - rv. I•
m
7EASLEY MALI. SUBDIVISION 4'h r r LI,„r, IN, I,. It Lc Ile 00010E .9,•ne nADA it rnl rOr Vl. ,I Uu h•I 4'r l4'. I' I I_.
MY w! 10, HN
Al to „l,0 lha! stet Vlld IA,, !of it,, I'Nrrno, NOW cOhtfl!II tl In , _I1101 rot f,. rcr 11 r u I, I, rl
ALL' N, 1004
PI INC, Ni of IL AI (d LOI 4 n A/ A, PtrrxA "lr,n uudrl 4'Y AA, 1' Ind erns PI 0f fit„ Ih1e tht d:•
1I Ioil fI VA LI $UPDf Y,SION 11 POOL 'InI''F I'rrflI Il t
' I 1 111.III, 'M ELI 111 11 Ill' fi
I 1 . le I
CIT141 q0 tPAN 11 (w ttul on
(w,o L
10AS 1'!I I, 1100.1. Il,rl!ln I. It yn< 1n 1 •r,ln II ~.lO FI1PL of At it I 4'r tIStt0 WILL S Ct0IINAN A 1 1 , e1 WICK 1.::
t 1)(A-1004 . ttaa
r -I 0000
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of lot 5,
block C, Westgits Park Addition, 1st Addition
SU181ARY: This is a ,964 acre tract located at the
Southwest corner of Fladger Drive and Westgate
Drive,) The property is zoned single family
(SF-16) and single family detached land use is
proposed,
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered a
request for a variance of perimeter street
paving requirements and standard provisions
requiring the extension of water and sewer
across the full width of one face of the
property. The Planning and Zoning Commission
denied the request for perimeter street paving
and water variances. The sewer requirement was
waived because there are grade problems,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve preliminary plat with conditions
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and toning Commission recommends
approval with the following conditions:
1. That perimeter street paving and drainage
improvements will be provided for during the
final plat
2. That the sewer across the entire width of
property be waived
ALTERNATIVE: Approve preliminary plat with or without
conditions
ATTACHME) S: Reduced map
D1vid Ellison
Senior Planner
0706a
fly e'
1 I ~IrI rr.r~
I
61s'rl~I
s 1 _
. n i. r 1. 1 t.i r
I ;
i
I I
I
I
I
wilt ,"rl ' Iw.l n. III IIV rll/ AIII'lpl Ill( tll IN ll It`ll. ,rll.i `
fll:
+ ,I I
IL1, ll A IUI p Ill nl:n t' I
" ' 711111 l' I Ili 1 ! .
1
i I I 1
1
I i
r
wi I
S
f r
1 ~ J
1 I 1
i I
1
+l i~. ~_I Vl~l11•,r.~ 111/\
I '
~ i I I'lfi4:~1 ;1i' :II'I'IUIJ
I i
I I
~ I 4` 1111 111111i+1U1~ :,I Grl~lt I~rr. .
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT; Approval of the preliminary plat of the Mt,
Calvary Addition
SUMMARY; This is a 4.1.36 acre parcel located adjacent and
west of Bushey Street, adjacent and north of
Morse Street and adjacent and south of Wilson
Street, The property is zoned single family
(SF-7) and development of a church is
anticipated.
Wilson Street is an improved perimeter
residential street, Morse is an unimproved
secondary arterial and Bushey Street an 11-12
foot public road by prescription. The Planning.
and Zoning Commission granted a variance or
waived Improvements to Bushey Street at its
meeting of July 25, 1984, (approximately 621.E
feet of frontage). Bushey Street was included
in a past Community Developpment Grant Applica-
tion and was not improved because it did not
serve a significant amount of existing and/or
proposed development, The Director of Planning
and Community Development has agreed to Include
total improvements to Bushey Street in the 1955
C.DB.G, application. Mt. Calvary has agreed to
dedicate the balance of additional right-of-way
needed for Bushey Street off its tract. No
access is proposed from Bushey Street. Morse
Street right-of-way dedication and perimeter
street improvements will he provided (approxi-
mately 375 feet),
Adequate electrical, gas, telephone, water and
sewer facilities are in place.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval with the following conditions:
1, One permanent driveway shall be permitted
off Morse Street
Mt. Calvery Addition
August 70 1984
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
(continued); 2, Morse Street shall be improved! }per perimeter
street paving requirements of the subdivision
on regulations and land devel,.Ipment code
3. Adequate right-of-way for Bushey Street im-
provements shall be dedicated on the final
plat
ALTERNATIVES; 1, Approval of the preliminary plat with condi-
tions regarding Bushey Street
2. Approval of the preliminary plat with addi-
tional conditions
ATTACHMENT,. Reduced map
Ojzlipw
av son
Senior Planner
i
0715a
I
I ~ 1 r ~
1 F 1'185' WI\7nN i 11'. ~1 .1- +
. wlwl r.Iwlr r "P -AllAllil.t-
• Ile r lot / / I 1 I+I
I I _ f A11R '
4 I! 1
1 ~ 1 I rfl5lr Ir rtNIC ~ ]3 •MU rT'll~
h I 1 ._Vito. 4141111A
u1
/ ~ I 1 r\ 1111 /
yli,'ta(fl~l~ ;1 j YICIHItY MAP
! I 1
Ott 1
N 1~
.1,11111
I I0l11,
/.11.11
I '`f,, ~ ~ I,~ 11 NIN1111 Valf11 ~r 1
` i HI G}V`, 1 1, IN1111111,V//111tll LYN 1111 V/INH
1 / I' IUeN11Vq 11N
1 1 1 f IaN1Na lost, INI Il11VNeaVNaaa
1f117~ 111 ?I
~`5~ lA IL, thn e OF l I It M164 i 9 :A Gn ~ II II/U IION IHNV.
lee' fl 1. tl
Gr
1/ 1 I r I
0 11 .11111 '
r ,.ta s Iot 1. ntecN 1
1 RP° St i r 0111. 1 Ir n.. rl , nl rr, n'll IN♦ It A".%,
_........u
Mgl1N1 CAI YAn' OAPtlll A0111i1e71 1 1 I 1 11^Inl I, a r.n a./1 el
x ~ • .irl 1 11'1 II II Ir if 11
~III IIq rl 1. lrll fOnxlr 8111 N10V, 111.5 m ; „1 n .nl .rll lln. nl 11. 11181
1,< 1 1.. rl . r1. ,ar,,. I •rl •.I nl InI 1 II 11
1 r.l 1 1 1 Y5r
A 119.1 ACM: I I ~ 1
I II' n1~ . .1 1. 1 li 111 II I 1 I. 1 If r. . ,~In.11
I Ir, 11r1 1 1 ~I , I 1 n
f~I II 1I 'I 11' V ~ r n . 111 11 ~1 14 ♦ lun 1 rnlr.ll
I ll,l. I~ Ilil I~'/111 ~r ' 1 " 1 .Ir. ,
f ~ ~ ~ II[ I r II 11' I I♦' 1 r I-r ♦ IH 1r 11 r1 1. ♦ O~11 rl, II
r 1 +;L;~ lil. l 1 1. I ..r.l,l 1...111,:1..1 In l l,ne. rel.al
J 1 11 1..1 1 1 ,Ilnl I IA /1 1 I. ..l
it 1 . 11 Illrll
1' / I i ~ 1 II '1 1 n 1 11. u.. Ir.r M+Iq _nlul '
/ 1111 I~ I I'. .•I I .n llr, al
1, II ar r5 I1. 'qli n b.. 1 11 1..1 17 ♦ Hnl rle
fx1~11 I'll rI Nj 1 1 "1. ~ Irv I bx6 51 rr 11 r11 .1111 11
,I / ' 1 I Ir° I.I r.1nr ~Inr nl ♦11.11., Ir.. e
x,land I 1 I H'. 11.n'f-..r1 ..C 1. 11 ♦n'a, .nI 1111w1
' 1 I l
1111 4
t .111. ' I 1
I, l
1
5 1 ~ Ill I 1
1 11 .
r u I' 1 .
a' 11a.d i 1
qli 1j1• •111' I tlr'f'.. Ir Y.
1
Alon-it
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT; Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Southridge II Addition
SUMMARY: This is a 43.218 acre parcel located west of
Ridgeway and Southridge Drive and south of
Stonegate Drive,
The existing zoning is single family (SP-10)
lots and proposed development conforms with
zoning ordinance requirements. Although
presently zoned and not proposed for change,
this site is included in a larger change in
zoning proposal submitted by Ms, Jo Storer anti
scheduled for August 8, 1984, Planning and
Zoning Commission action.
Again, the requested change will not affect
zoning of this tract, but there were concerns
about plans for access to this site should
zoning along Ridgeway Drive be permitted.
All plans for public facilities with exception
of streets and sewer are adequate; two conditions
are attached that address problems in those two
areas,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny preliminary plat.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval with the following conditions:
1. The developer must. improve the Hobson lift
station and construct a new gravity sewer
line to State School Road intercepter, or
wait until improvements are made and ade-
quate sewer capacity is made available
through the five (5) year Capital Improve-
ments program before tying into the existing
sewer system is permitted.
Agenda Back-up
Southridge 11 Addition
Page Two
RECOMMENDATION
(continued): 2, The preliminary plat shall be voided,
revised and resubmitted for review and
approval if a 161 acre proposed planned
development petition proposed by Ms. Jo
Storer involving this site and surrounding
property is not approved by the Planning and
zoning Commission and City Council,
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve preliminary plat with conditions
2. Deny preliminary plat
ATTACHMENTS: 1, Reduced preliminary plat
2. Memorandum from Jerry Clark, City Engineer
3, Development Review Committee minutes of Jul),
24, 1984
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0393s
'b
, , ~ Jfpb7u n„IIM NIaf n.
] o v r it t I r o ( r . I;ir •'}f r iJ ' 9-- -
14-4
, 1 ''.N. - r.~ r 111. fv r\ Il . ? ~
_1_.!.. _ _.+d_ ..L.- 9` l ~ 1,~, fit, If I II y it 11 11 a'" ! 1! ~ ~ / 1,~ ~
. 1
r
n
c 1 t t ! Sff I'r ' 4. SG 1 • L.L,Y.. -'_-t . -TnI \
Myk?i,~~o- d 1}J 1 ,.1 0 , t,r`_ " \ • JV -.i
lit Y~. s,r 1 / I 1( ill 1L I y .IP. •1 - p`
po,
I 1 1 1 Lf ~ J i I ~ it x _ I ~
r' - I -1. / t. r' r r..~, r' .~-1 r ::e._ i"••~ 4'f~ ~J ,I I\' \ \ %
r ( II ' 1( ~ Lr fJ H V ~ II 4 d l it,
\ 1, ) J "~~1 1 LY H V •D lA4t yV , 1 ' .
sc1 • 1 I ~ 1 177, I, •1o a 11 ry. .r r! I• \}3 _b.S ..1
r - { V~.. \r ( , +I I 1lLOGK .fir ~ ~ (1 1 r
.
V ~I} I. 11 1`
' r Y.. _ ~ \'Y 1. I n ~ + {..Y M.
t
• V /
1 y 71 71 tf H II it !1 rt '4 ~ 1l 'f t/ '
1: A I { I V ~ .
• ,_.y_.=D1 ~_~"r~~='Till. _ ~J~_ _ _ )1.
(1 I - _Lll-~1 '.'7r•~--.1 w 11111..QYi'3_Y~~ ~-9 W w u M.-~.___"_ _•f_'_ ,
( r 1 i l r t
'f~ 451•i r / p If It i r! I1! H I] M ~14L1' 1f `r
1 I ,f
!/11~ H I Y. iM1 ,l 1 +11p]Lt.Yi_T•~••!i S G V T a1
1.4,I rv
I
A14 N Yi
i OCC TI AS
44 p l P. uk
1 ti' 1(OI rMCA
I • .i'J )YIU co I1 rlfm u~y
,L'1 ,'u•
pi'A(111 rOrr O[V[..1 M,LNI MLLN it
't • • eft ~
,r U r!
EDCWNrON, TWX" MUNICIPAL SUIL DING / DINTON, TMAS 16201 / TELEPNONfr 1817!1 564•d200
M E M O R A N D U il-i
TOi David Ellison, Senior Planner
FROM, Jerry Clark, City En inner and
Koorosh Olyai, Traffic Engineer
DATE: July 23, 1984
RE: Southridge II - Preliminary Plat - Phase I
The preliminary plat of Southridge II creates two traces
totaling 9.37 acres with 40 units. This land is divided intr;
two sections on each side of Southridge that will create ma,joc
traffic problems, inefficient land use and mainly platting a
section of a major tract without a proval of zoning for the
whole tract. This creates the possibility of two sections o
land that can not be used in the best fashion for the City o.:
Denton if the proposed zoning of clusters (we don't suppors
this) isn't approved,
A possible solution now is to require adequate stubouts to the
tracts to allow efficient land use if the future zoning i,
denied.
All the above questions, considerations, etc, are comments as.
the preliminary plat does generally meet the letter of t'na
law. Please consider the comment of plating a section before
the whole tract is zoned as it effects City of Denton input ana{
control greatly.
Jerry/ Char ooros ya
City Engineer' Traffic Engineer
is
#0241E
RECEIVED JILL 2 4 1QQ4
Minutes
Development Review Committee
July 24, 1984
ARC Members Present: David Ellison Wayne Horsley Don McLaughlin,
Pablo Rubio, benise Spivey, tommy Stone, Texx
Stewart, David Ham, Harlan Jefferson
Developer Present: Jo Storer
Engineer, Planner Charles Watkins, Greg i:dwards
VII. Review of General Development Plan and Preliminary Plat of
Southridge II Addition
A. Engineering and Transportation Engineering
1. Stubout Gatewood Circle to Ridgaway along s~initary
sewer easement (see copy of related memo).
2. Preliminary plat acceptable, however, consider what is
stated in memo to David Ellison,
36 Transportation Engineering comments as follows:
at Preliminary plat for Southridge lI does not
provide for any internal access for the two tracts
(J + acres) on either side of Southridge west of
Ridgeway, It was anticipated that access to these
two tracts will be via Ridgeway Drive. The point
was substantiated with the submission of gonerai
development plan, that in fact access to these two
tracts are being proposed from Ridgeway Drive.
b, Design geometrics of Ridgeway includes one large
vertical curve (hill) which limits visibility of
crossing streets and/or driveways to Ridgeway
Drive. In order to correct this problem, it is
recommended that adequate stubout be provided for
access purposes to these tracts, thus eliminating
future openings on Ridgeway,
c, Intersections should be at 900,
d, Minimum horizontal curve length is 250' radius;
ninety degree angles may be used.
1
Minutes
DevoloppMont Review Committee
Southridge 11 Addition
July 24, 1984
Page Two
B, Water and Sewer
1. What position of this development will need to tie
onto Hobson Street gravity sewer line on Teasley
Lane. To do so, lift station improvements will need
to be made by developer or wait until bond election
is approved for city Utilities Department to
accomplish work in next year's Capital Improvements
Program,
2, East portion of this development will need to provide
an on and off-site sewer line to State School Road.
4versizing and pro-rata agreements may be approved by
the Public Utility Board and City Council,
3. Approximately 26" and 12" waterline needs to be
constructed on Ridgeway Drive (City may participate
in oversizing.)
4. No pro grata charges,
i
S. Preliminary plat is acceptable subject to on and
off-site improvements being made by developer or City
through bond program.
C. Electric
1. See 7/17/84 Development Review Committee comments.
2, Preliminary plat is acceptable.
D. Fire
1, Preliminary plat is acceptable.
2. Please rofei to Development Review Committee comments
of 7/3/84,
B. Building Inspection
See 7/17/84 Development Review Committee comments.
F. Lone Star Gas
Preliminary plat is acceptable.
G. General Telephone
Preliminary plat is acceptable.
Minutes
Development Review Committee
Southridge II Addition
July 24, 1984
Page Three
H. Cox Cable
No representative was present,
I, Solid Waste
Service is available,
J, Parks and Recreation
This department is extremely concerned about the absence
of a neighborhood park in this area.
K. Planning and Community Development
Preliminary plat is scheduled for July 25, 1984, Planning
and Zoning Commission action,
0010a
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
1A9K-UP SUWRY SHUT
MEETING DATEt August 7, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the site lan of Township 11, Phas6
11 (San Jacinto Shopp ng Center)
SUMMARY., This 12,17 acre tract located between San Jacinto
Boulevard, Piney Creek Boulevard, Township 1I,
Phase 1, and the IH-35E service road is zoned
planned development (PD-6) for commercial land
use, The Henry S. Miller Company is seeking
site plan approval and preliminary replat ap-
proval for a proposed shopping center develop-
ment. A proposed 60,000 square foot Msrvynals
Department Store represents the major user or
anchor for the shopping center. Mervyn's will
occupy Lot 4 as presently shown. In addition to
Mervyn's, four separate buildings with combined
retail lease space of 69,982 square feet is
proposed.
Proper zoning is in place, The Development
Review Committee has been in close contact with
the developers of this tract and other tracts
for several months, its review is continuing
with access both on-site and off-site being a
major consideration (particularly along the IH-35
service road.) Utility capabilities (speoifi-
cally sewer) are also being looked at extremely
closely.
Piney creak Boulevard is presently abandoned, but
proposed for reopening if an upcoming change,in
zoning request is approved. Me, Jo Storer is
proposing the change which is scheduled for
August 8, 1964, Planning and Zoning Commissio►:
consideration. The Henry S. Miller Company sites
plan has been,developed to accomodate both clos-
ing and opening Piney Creek, The Piney Creek
Boulevard question and other matters such as
screening were discussed in a meeting which
included a Township II neighborhood representa-
tive, a Henry S. Miller Company representative.
Jo Storer, and two members of the Planning and
Community Development Department. The Henry S.
Miller Company is proposing to relocate existing
utilities at their expense and grant an easement
P&Z Backup
Page a
SUM"Ry
(oontinued); where necessary in order to build over a portion
of Piney Creek Boulevard it the public right-of-
way is abandoned. An approximats 30 foot portion
of the street could possibly be used for private
and emergency vehicle access purposes. No. Storer
and the Henry S. Miller company conceptually
agreed that a private easement for access would
be an acceptable alternative during the latest
meeting held on July 18, 1984, The neighborhood
representative also agreed with the private access
oonceppt, but could not speak for the homeowner's
association as a whole,
The Utility Department has required the Henry S.
Miller Company to submit a written agreement
limiting initial occupancy and development to
100,000 square feet for "dry type, users only.
An existing 1011 sewer line which will serve this
development cannot acoomodate restaurants and
similar users. A copy of the agreement is
attached.
ACTION REQUIRED: 1. Approval of the site plan with or without
recommended conditions
2. Approval of the site plan with additional
conditions
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval of the site plan with the following
conditions:
1. Building permits and certificates of ocoupany
for no more than 100,000 square feet of "dry
type" commercial facilities can be constructed
and tied onto existing sewer systems. Im-
provements to Woodrow Lane sewer line through
proposed City of Denton capital Improvements
Plan or through developer participation must
be provided to accommodate additional develop.-
mont other than described in the attached
agreement.
2. Th;, median opening on San Jacinto Boulevard
shall be reconstructed to accommodate a 30
foot opening.
PU Backup
Page 3
RECOH,MNDATIONs 3, Approval, of site plan does not constitute
(continued) Mal approval of plans for Piney crook
Boulevard. Piney Crook Boulevard final
action shall be addressed in aanSunction
with pending request to emend planned
development (PD-6,1),
XLTERNATIVG6i 1. Approve site plan with or without conditions
2. Approve site plan with additional conditions
3. Deny site plan
AT'TACHMENTSs 1. Site Plan
2. Letter from Thomas M. Mosser to Bob Nelson
3. 'traffic Access Study for San Jacinto Plaza
Shopping Center
David Fl son'~v' t°r
Senior Planner
0712a
. ^x"1':11
IL ,
r
11 J
V L
T •i~l.~fY/ .Zi .•~~yI4~ ~
IIF j,~
r I Ij i1 . I I 1'~ k •
Div
{ 1 ' { r
r
r
HENRY S. MILLER CQ, DEVELOPMENT GROUP
• July 24, 1984
Mr, Bob Nelson
Director of Utilities
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Re; San Jacinto Plaza Shopping Center/Mervyns
Golden Triangle Joint Venture, Owner
Township II, Phase 2
12,17+ Acres
Dear Mr, Nelson;
As you know, we are proposing a 1359000 square foot retail development
at the above referenced location, which will include a 60,000 square foot
Mervyns Department Store.
Please let this letter serve as our understanding that you will allow up to
. 100,000 square feet of retail space to tie into the existing sanitary sewer
lines which serve our property,
We agree to restrict any uses which are marked with an "XII on the attached
Exhibit "A", which will preclude Cafeteria, Laundry or Cleaning Self Service,
and Restaurant, relative to the Retail and Service Type Uses, This restriction
will apply only until such time as City of Denton funding is assured for
sanitary sewer improvements along Woodrow Lane, Our property will not be
subject to assessment as a result of these improvements,
You also agree that the Utility Department will not cause a Building Permit
to be withheld relative to the 100,000 square feet of retail space in the
interim period before the above referenced sanitary sewer improvements are
in place,
If this letter accurately represents your understanding, ploase acknowledge
so in the space provided below.
Sincerely,
Thomas M. Mosser Ackn ledge and greed;
Project Director
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities
Date, ? 2 -
2001 BryAn Ta*Qt. 001h FlOa. NOW. rexa, 76201 (2144 7189171
ti, IMe
34 Uaioa AaOft * balba, Taco 7W , 314/741470
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Mosser
Henry S, Miller Company
FROM: DeShazo, Starek 8 Tang, Inc.
DATE: July 20, 1984•
SUBJECT: Traffic Access Study for San Jacinto Plaza Shopping
Center in Denton; J84083
INTRODUCTION
As shown in Figure 1 the study site is located in the northwest
quadrant of the intersection of San Jacinto and the westbound
frontage road of I.H. 35E. The site is divided into two tracts:
the main tract has 134,782 square feet (S.F,) of shopping center
containing 74,782 S.F, of retail and a 60,000 S.F. "Mervyn's",
and a future tract with 5,000 S.F. of retail.
The following analysis considers total anticipated development on
both tracts and assesses the access needs of the site in relation
to existing and anticipated traffic flows along adjacent
thoroughfares.
THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM
As shown in Figure 2 the site is served by three thoroughfares:
San Jacinto Boulevard along the eastside, Dallas Avenue (U.S. 77),
and the westbound frontage road of C.H. 35E along the southside.
o San Jacinto Boulevard - Currently exists as a four-lane
divided roadway. It provides access to the westbound
frontage road and Colorado Boulevard on the northeast
side of the Golden Triangle Mall
o Dallas Avenue (U.S. 71) - Currently exists as a four-lane
divided roadway with sufficient right-of-way to construct
an additional two lanes to upgrade it to a six-lane
divided roadway.
FIGURE 1
$It* location
31411 a it A ow w•• `
1 r ~ ~ p' o
w DEN TO
M 40f,!
I w
\ r r
r
1 ~ f
r J~ .
s r 1 f . ~ 19R
d r ~
1 ~ t
Rh
r
} r
1 IN 1
i I
I ~ 1 W•
t J y
Y I ~ : M r/lR W/N ft 4f u~
t~
I
SITE
c
. • 0 0 ~ AM" RpfA I+NI ~ NCIR ~ly»--1
n N W } s R ~u 0'.40
0~ ~fy
1 ~ ♦ ~
I~ yy~ t~ l 0 f ~ "M~
~~3
J t .
M
1s t11 +J,..
+ ' R \
~4r
NHIpA I .J / Zo tAU
1 ~
J 1
uro
IIRSitaao, Slarell k Taft, lat.
1
1
FIGURE 2
THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM
ARE
~ OALLAi NME.
o westbound Frontage Road of Ithe 3K . This section of
frontage road is constructed as a two-lane, one-way west-
bound thoroughfare, It is classified as a primary
arterial by the City of Denton.
SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC
Shown in Table I are the trip generation figures associated with
the study site, These figures include a potential "Wolfe's
Nursery" or other retail function on the tract adjacent to Dallas
Avenues Approximately 11,237 trips will be generated by the
total development in a twenty-four hour period.
These projections were based on traffic generation rates deve-
loped by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and refined by
DeShazo, Starek A Tang, Inc.
TABLE I
TRIP GENERATION
LAND USE AREA 24-HOUR A,M, PEAK P,M, PEAK
TRIPS
Retell 74,782 S.F, 6,131 90 90 283 300
Mervyn's 60,000 S,F, 40920 72 72 227 242
ub -tot a
POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
Retail 5,000 S,F. 186 2 2 8 9
TOTAL 11,237 164 164 518 550
Of the total 11,237 daily trips to and from the center, 108 trips
will be generated by service vehicles The breakdown of service
vehicle trips per 24 hours is shown in Table 2. Approximately 16
percent of the 108 daily trips would be by design vehicles
greater than a Single Unit ($,U.) Design Vehicle
TABLE 11
SERVICE VEHICLE TRIPS
(24-Hours)
USE ONE-WAY TRIPS
Retail 63
Mervyn's 42
Wolfe Nursery 3
TOTAL 108
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The orientations of the traffic by a percentage of the total
expected to approach the development from various directions are
depicted in Figure 3. These traffic orientations are used in
distributing the trips to the area thoroughfare system and in
planning the access requirements of the development. Figure 4
depicts the driveway turning movements generated by the proposed
development during the p,m, peak period. The evening peak hour is
important since a combination of the site-generated and on-street
traffic during this time frame results in the greatest impact on
the total transportation system,
DRIVEWAY ANALYSIS
Based upon the p.m. peak hour volumes shown on Figure 4, a preli-
minary analysis of driveway needs was developed. Utili2ing an
average driveway capacity of 275 to 300 vehicles per hour, the
following number of inbound and outbound lanes to specific
thoroughfares are needed:
San Jacinto Boulevard: one (1) inbound lane
one (1) outbound lane
FIGURE 3
Trip Qrlentatlon
0
♦ •1 N H~~~q N 11 •a ~ .
M~ Aw1
FIGURE 4
P.M. Peak Hour Turning Movements
1 1
1 w ~i
111_"
1 sr 100 160
. 111~~A l1 ~ 11 r~r~~.11 ~i F 1. -Y. 11 .I ,
10 4
r
OAUAM MVIE.
Westbound I.H. 35E Frontage Road; two (2) inbound lanes
two 2) outbound lanes
Combining the results of the above analysis with the need to pro-
vide access to 108 service vehicles, to provide access and ade-
quate fire lanes for fire emergency vehicles, and to reduce
on-street conflicts as well as interior lot conflicts, a driveway
layout as shown pictorically on Figure 3 is recommended.
DRIVEWAY JUSTIFICATION
The site plan provided by the architect shows the proposed number
of driveways and recommended designs in relation to the proposed
site plan. The driveways have been designed to provide adequate
access to the shopping center while minimizing the impact on the
adjacent thoroughfares.
The driveways have been designed to handle a Single Unit Design
Vehicle easily while the large W.B. - 50 Design Vehicle can nego-
tiate all entering and exiting maneuvers with minimal lane
infringements.
Specific driveway design conditions related to the site plan are
as follows:
o The northern-most access point along San Jacinto
Boulevard exists as a dedicated roadway named "Piney
Creek Boulevard We propose that it be abandoned and
maintained in the future by us as a ,joint-use access
easement between "San Jacinto Plaza" and the future deve-
lopment to the north. The primary function of this drive
is to provide ingress and egress for service vehicles to
the site.
o We propose that a full function drive with left-turn
storage in the median along San Jacinto be constructed at
a point 320 feet south of Piney Creek Boulevard and 580
feet from the intersection of San Jacinto Boulevard and
the I.H.35E Service Road.
o A "Gibralter Savings and Loan" exists at the corner of
San Jacinto Boulevard and westbound I.H.35E Service Road.
There are two drives serving this institution and are not
intended to be utilized by traffic approaching the
shopping center.
o DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. has designed a rather unique
intersection at the two western-most access points at
Dallas Avenue (U.S,77) and the westbound I.H.35E Service
Road. This design provides critical 'access to the project
from the north on Dallas Avenue (U.S. 77) and serves the
entire project via a two-way access easement that
parallels the service road on the development site.
o The access point gust to the east of t"is interchange is
approximately 340 feet from the nearest drive and 10050
feet from the intersection of San Jacinto Boulevard and
the westbound I,H,35f Service Road. This drive is 25
feet wide and will function as a right-in, right-out only
dri ve
o The access point gust to the east of the above mentioned
will operate in the same manner, It is 25 feet wide and
is located approximately 540 feet from the intersection
and 340 feet from the closest driveway.
CONCLUSION
The driveway locations and designs, shown in detail on the archi-
tectural site plan, are considered adequate to provide efficient
and safe access to and from the proposed shopping center. A
thorough attempt has been made to meet the City of Denton
Driveway Standards, while also providing needed access and on-
site circulation. Finally the proposed development as planned
will have a minimal impact on the existing thoroughfare system,
I
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
RACK-UP SUMMARY StMET
~I
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary replat of Township
Ii, Phase II (San Jacinto Shopping Center)
SUMMARY: This is the formal replat of the above referenced
proposed shopping canter development. Lots 2 and
3 presently exist at this commercial (C) site,
The replat as proposed will establish four (4)
lots. Conditions concerning this development are
attached to the site plan.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Approval of the preliminary replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary replat
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0708q
ONN
I ` yry'.~~~~\
4041
r
I `42
tivl '
\ b I /
17 ( 'A. I V r
, ICI
.4 IIt fAII H
1 ~b6 (P t(r ctAtt N
OL 4. ! Jl` ~S]U~ 1
f \,IAy, Y/1 t.flA 411 ~ I~y i,
i ti .u f J(
%CALF 1. NO
~~'IIMMNVV ^e, pn~`v> /K•r JULY 4 1"4
MAP
.1 cl
I f SIEA1
%C01 or1f1AA1q,It .1 Y
. • , h . / t
ti\. ti. -1\~• •t/ /I ~f•f/ p tG01 owl''a'+IVtn
y~.. / AI'r'lll tf A, ' >n . P ~ \ ~ fr 1•+~ fl IO IA 110076
( r• (YII L/f •J ~?Cll
AI bQ ` ~ I
tTttII"i "_-----t"11 ~f1 rrl, '~•1 ~ O ~ rl+s~/
er1.4 LtAE1 i ' «~•-"~•c'=~`\ ii ~;nl~.._.\,~( 1 b 1 ~'{./-i'~( I .
MINI r , Y < `~3 I ' .1 V
IC.1'~ N' { ' i' / _ ~•r / Ott 4~//`~•J ~ S / y. .u1M ~ ' /1
i 1 tJ T / . I : ~ I Il i i h
l I l~ pl A ~ Ill
(1 ~ V IIJ~ ! ~F--- r\' n+a ~p t . e 1 ..11.«..1.
LS v iC~ ( Y'j' J / \ L-II~Y ,ru: \ i~r+~w lJ, I IOWN 5II11 S7
G t 9(1 Arl \ \ } / / e, .1. 1.1 I I rNl14 F,
'r ~ .y w•e ` It S I ~ i 1 I 1~~\ / / r _ I I J _ MM .4fR.u, o- 1Ir.~
1 f aV~~lr 1- ~ \ xr~.!'•~!~`" / ~l r rrt..J I lU,~c^ rv
• r 1 r3_.' ` J I 1 q~'In Ival ~ ~ ~t'I fltMr/D Lnlr rf
L~ I: Rrl nip .:.1 \ \ i r z •.•~ve.»~ --•U4.0 410Nj1 w L- (NI lR 'lIna
r w Y} J v ~~f I r 11 ! I 14W 4:v r M"
tl~-_ _S_1• n +~NN7rN l,r~ +ti.'r . ral
_iLit.
~,j~ ~a Y.r •!M.'. 411.4 ~...J I11 ~{1 ~'~fr ~ I•. _~'llfr \4Nrl- f♦fY lf[1Mr1 hY<.AI•U
1
I V~ t4
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: August 7, 1984
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITEM 15 TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA)
Final payment for Drainage improvements for 1983
SUMMARY: Approve final payment for Bell Coronado, Paisley-Mulkey and
Ponder Drainage Projects which were completed on July 30,
with all work days used,
FISCAL SUM',1ARY: Total of Three Projects m $648,425,85
Original Estimate - $631,994,25
Cost Overrun 2,6%
ACT M0 REQUIRED: Approve final payment of $98,578,19
it
ALTERNATIVES: Other as determined.
STAFF RECOMMFNDATIONS:
Approve payment
EXHIDITS: Hemo to Rick Svehla on July 31, 1984
CITY O/ DEMON, rEX" MlsH1cipa dlJmmG / OeNTOis, Tirms 76241 / TarPHOHE (817) 366.8200
M E M 0 R A N 0 U M
TO; Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
DATE: July 31, 1984
RE; Final Payments - Drainage Improvements 1983 Projects -
Bid #9193
The ro,jects were completed on July 30, 1984, to City
speci?ications including all cleanup.
1) Paisley-Mulkey Drainage;
Original Estimate $148,738.00
Final Contract Price $152,244,80
Final Payment $16,339,85
All 50 work days used.
Cost overruns were due to a $2,500 water line lowering and
extra concrete riprap needed. Percent of overrun is 2,4`/„
2) Bell-Coronado Drainage;
Original Estimate +$329,3b5,25
Final Contract Price +$332,202,64
Trevira Fabric +31002,40
Total Price + 5.
Less Developer Contribution .11,3513,45
Actual Cost to City +$323,846.59
Final Payment +$46,446,8b
All 100 work days were used,
The project was expanded with a developers contribution to
include a channel, Percent saved with that contrioution is
10
,70,
page Y of "t
3) ponder Street Drainage+
Original Estimate $153, 91,0
Final Contract price $172,34,46
Final Payment $33,791,48
Street Department Participation -4,000,00
(in curb repair)
Ali 80 work days were used.
Even with the curb participation of the Street Department,
the project overran 9.4°x, When the project was designed,
the gas company located its lines for us. When the project
started, the actual location forced our storm sewer into a
position where most of the curb and 8' of street had to be
removed, The Street Department participated to allow the
curb from Scripture to Gregg on Ponder to be completely
replaced as it was very old and deteriorated greatly under
construction.
Total of all three projects,-
(Cost to City of Denton) $64b,425,85
Estimated Cost $b3l,994,25
Cost Overrun 2.6%
In conclusion, the cost overruns on Ponder were fairly major
but the drainage, curb, and street improvements completed are
very significant for that older, vital (Flow Hospital) area,
Bell Coronado Project should solve major drainage problems and
flooding in that area, Also, in conjunction with the Street
Department, Bell Avenue was rebuilt from Coronado to Driftwood
Trail. This was badly needed. Paisley-Mulkey will relieve
five houses of major flooding, greatly reduce the depth of
water in the low point on Paisley and in ggeneral provide for
future control of all drainage in that small basin, Overall,
some very significant gains have been made with only 2.6% cost
overrun.
Je{ y G~1a k
Ci En veer
is
#0241E
TKES SYSTEMS INC.
a Control Data Company
16775 Addison Road
Dallm, TexAs 78248
214/248-8737
June 8, 1984
Mr. Gary Collins
City of Denton
324-A East McKinney
Denton, Texas '16201
Dear Mr. Collins:
Enclosed is a Maintenance Addendum Agreement, an invoice
for one year's maintenance, and two copies of our Client
Order Form. After you have read the Addendum, please
sign the Client Order Form and return one copy to my
attention.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for
your continuing relationship with `1'RES, and if i can be
of further assistance, please write or call me directly.
Sincerely,
Paul Distefano
Sr, Vice President
GPD/sp
Enclosures: Maintenance Agreement
Client Order forms (2)
-.n +.ri a ii cnra wira c.o nfmny
' e
CLIENT ORDER FORM
Amend, No. Order Date the m PC W
CUENI NaME PA No Jo No {ISI) L7S,161
City of Denton 7-8 INVOICING ADDRESS if di1i Irom Agreement) SNIP TO ADDRESS bl DiNerent 324-A last McK
inney
CITY 9TA7E ZIP CITY
Den ton STATE ZIP
Texas 76201
ORDER TYPE SITE ADDRESS (Include Room, Bulld gig, Floor)
Initial Order Add On Order Change Order
Lrcarsed Nralar)aIS U Licensed Materials I Site City STATE Z P
Maintenance YMaintenance InvoictngAddress
CuEN7
CITY OF UF:NTON T14ES Sysl*mt, Inc.
By IAuuionted Signature) By IAul100112ed S+gnalurs) J ^
NAME NAM U
David R, iffen F4 0
MILL iLE
o MAw TENANCE
Executive Vice President Ei W r LICENSE FEE ;;yAROe
DALE DATE H M w
Oly Number DESCRIPTION Version d
Release
1 EIS Maintenance Fee 7-1-84 X
$11, .:x0.00
to
6-30-85
Specified Operatino Equipment Delivery Media ALL CHARGES EXCLUDE
TOTAL
APPLICABLE TAXES 1.1. , x0, OO
Use wiPr Primary Agreemonl, Licensed Materials Addendum or Maintenanco Addonuu rr
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY VENDOR
TRFS SYSTEMS, INC,
a Contird Data Company
CLIENT ORDER FORM
CL IENt NAME PA No Jc~ No. I lsll Jo. No. 2nd) Amend. No. Order Dale client PO .wc
City of Denton 758 013
INVOICING ADDRESS lit ddfo+ent hom Agreement; SHIP TO ADDRESS pt Odlerenl from Sile)
324-A East MoKinnoy
Clly STATE 21P CITY STATE r!Ir
Denton Texas 76201
ORDER TYPE SITE ADDRESS pnelude nown. Budding. Floor)
Irolial Order Add On Order Change Older
Licensed Mnlenals ; Licensed Materials I 'l Silo CITY
Mamlenance Maintenance i'l lnvoieing Addres STATE ~ryp
CLIENT
CITY OF DENTON TRES SyttMna, Inc,
By IAulhonted S gnalule) By (Avl or ed Slgnalure)
NAME NAME WW
David R, Kn eefi 7 a n
i~
HtLE TITLE
Executive Vice President g LICENSE rEE MA-ft, ;rNANCE
WC `rgNtlE
DATE
Oly Number DESCRIPTION Version 8
Release
1 EIS Maintenance Fee 7»1-84 X
to
7 7$4-.00
6-30-85
Specil ed OpoiAbng Equipment Delivery Media ALL CHARGES EXCLUDE TOTAL
APPLICABLE IA%ES $Li.r1110.00
Use with Primary Agreenmernl. Licensed Materials Addendum Of M alnlananCe Addenuu,-
. u rte, u. r....~n T, a urv ,mur~~r.
~1 TIES SYSTEMS INC
~J a Ccxwra DOm ConipAny
16775 Addison Road
Dallas, Texas 75218
2141248$737
INVOICE NUMBERi 060004
June 4, 1984
City of Denton
324-A East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Attention) Cary Collins
Invoice for the TRES Employee information System Maintenance Fee per
Primary Agreement No. 758.
CONTRACT PERIOD
July 1, 1984 to June 30, 1985
TOTAL INVOICE $11`5850_.400
4 ten, C', - '
Fxanze Wall
Controller
ku Please remit to;
TRES SYSTEMS, INC.
Post Office Box 84016
Dallas, Texas 75284
M rrru~rls
CITY 01' DENTON
DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
July 24, 1984
Called meeting of the City of Denton
Advisory Board, Wednesday, July 25,
1984 at 6100 P.M. at the City of Denton's
Data Procoss.tng office, 324 Last McKinney.
M01111)e18 Present: Gerald Cardwell
Dale Maddry
Ray PiLtman
Nombors Abr.;entr Ronald McDade
13i 11 Shanks
Others Present: Charlotte Allen
Ann 13ingman
Gary Collins
Mary Ramsey of Lhe City Staff
Charlotte Allen, the City Secretary, swore in Rory Pi lA ml' n lo 1j,;
laLcst terin as a member of the Data Processing Advisor} It, ;arr.9,
The members present drew lots to determine the year their ,;t>1,. int__
ment to the Data Processing Board would expire. Ray Oit.t.m;.rn ';no
Gerald Cardwell drew odd years and therefore their lern,s wi 11. and
in 1985 and all other ioernbers appointments will expire in 19136.
The m.inuLes of the June 11, 1984 meeting ware received and tt,-e
being no Changes to the minutes as written were approVod.
After much discussion about the proposed upgrade of word
equipment to handle fuhir:e growth and to relieve the immediaLe
limitations in the Word Processing Center, Ray Pitt-man made a ii- t. i c)n
to recommend the City of Denton Council approve thcprcluscd up:,1-.l:ie
of Lhe word processing equipment, Dale Maddry seconcied the motion
and the motion was passed unanimously. In the discussion, the n,c~;;,iucrs
of the Advisory Board indicated that they did not feel. that word
procossrn matters were nerr;ssar.ily the province of this
the word processing oqu.ipmenL wos going to be c-or'nectod to tire? ';eta
processing equip:ent via telephone lines or coaxial cables, it
was the feeling of the Board ghat these matters could be more
appropriately handled by coordination with the Director of Data
proccssi.r,g and t_he Board need only be involved in tho;re items 010
Director of Data Processing Would deem a matter for the Aclv.is"u:y
Board .
Gary Cola i rtS d1S('tSS d W1.t1) 1. 110 13oard that t.ho TRPS conr race
and nMS contract wero boUl coati nuaLlon of alto Sof'c yi)re Pt;t l nt r.trn e
contract ausociatod with the City of Dent.on's Payr.ol.l/Per;;olinel
SyStom and Financial System respectively, Me, Ray P.iti.lmul made L11o
observation Lliat he felt the Board has mace a corm 1LwcanL to this
philosophy four yoars ago and felt the associaLed costa were ruuc'h
less than costs of qualified prog;:anunors, Air, Dale Madclry i i,le
Cho obsorvat.iotl that if annual release, new cnhancoment:a and corroc:i icons
were not forthcoming for a period of time, than the City of Dcntors
should consider the option of not ronewing these maintenance ccntrcwt:,],
Gary C011.tns assured the Board that these ',.ype of cnhanccments,
vcleases acrd corrocLions had bean provided during Lhe past. your trod
new rclousc?s of those syst(nII8 woro plalmod for Lho upcominq yc.or.
The Advisory Board unan.i.mousl.y rOConurt0nded the City of Dc-neon's
Council approve both of Lhesc scftv"ciro maintonance Cont.ract.s.
Clary C011ins .infor•rted the Board that Mr, Bill Shanks bad writtcrn a
lot t:er i'c_;; i qn.i ng his mcmb~ r::ar.tp from tho. Da (a Pr: oc:esu i nc~ 71c1 v i :;orY
Board,
Thore huing no furl:her business, I.lie Do La Proc,e::;sing lulvitiory 13uu'c.l
nroot.ing was adjourned.
Amcrican Mana -'Y ment ayt,atems, Y11C,
John R. Ouina Ul
Vice Prreident
June 22, 1984
iJU~ 2 ~ ti9aa
Mr, Bill MrNary
Director of Finance
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney Street
Denton, TX 16201
Dear 8111;
Effective August 1, 1984, the LGFS maintenance support for the City of
Denton expires, Under the License Agreement, Denton 'is entitled to purchase
maintenance support from AMS for additional periods, Some of the benefits LGFS
clients derive from purchasing ongoing support from AMS are,.
• Delivery of annual enhancements to LGFS along with complete
installation instructions.
s Delivery of new modules which have been developed by AMS or other
users (i,e,, repor, tur, automatic check reconciliation, "what if"
budgeting, etc,)
o Updates to LGFS documentation,
is Continued active involvement in the Users Group (one of the main
sources for developing enhancements ' -ts).
• Support with the development of new repurt requests using AMS
provided report writers,
• Hotline support of LGFS processing logical questions.
We would like to continue to provide Denton with enhanced versions of LGFS
as they are released. The maintenance fee for LGFS is 10% of the prevailing
price list (attached).
Remittance of the attached invoice will provide Denton with LGFS
maintenance support for the 12-month period of !August 1, 1984 through July 31,
1985,
if you have any questions, please call me at (703) 841-6933,
Sincerely,
a ~
v' ohn R, Ottina
Vice President
1777 North Kent Street - Arlington, Virginia 22209 - (703) 841.6DD0 - Telex 64638 - Answerback AMSINC
Other Offices in Irosion, Chlcr,go, New York:, Jan Diego, 145:shington, D.C:,, and the San Pramisco Pdelr,)t)ohtan Area
All eric,,m Manag,C'l oat Systems, .Inc,
)ohn R. Ottlna
Vice President
June 22, 1984
Mr, Bill McNary
Director of Finance
Municipal Building
215 East McKinney Street
Denton, 7X 76201 Project No, P2649
INVOICE
LGFS Maintenance Fees for the City of Denton for
the period of August 1, 1984 through July 31, 1985,
LGFS (On-line System) $15,000.00
Fixed Assets 20000,00
Performance Measurement ^1,250.00
TOTAL INVOICE X18 X250,00
John/ R. Ot-tina
Vice President
1777 North Kent Sireei - Arlington, Virginia 22209 (7031841.6000 'Telex 6,1638 - Answerback ANfSINC
Other Offices in Iloston, Chicago, New York, Son Diego, Wash,ngton, D.C., and the San Francisco Metropolitaa Area
ANIVRICAN 1777N(xtlEfKVNTSIJ0TE t r1l~
MANAGF,N41 NT ARI.INCjV0dV, vA 22209
SYSIRNIS, INC, (703) 841.(0)0
f
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINA14CIA11 SYSTEM PRICE SCHEDULE
IBM VERS10N---1_GF -111-L1S
EfFF.CI* I\1r u1), 1983
VR01"1'SSI(_kNAL VA)IS
I. SOFTWARE LICENSE FEES PRICE orsulivw
Local Government financial System 01-1,111e Sstent) $150,11(10 Sit
011TIONS Payroll?I'ersonnel Management 75,000 40
Fixes! Assets 20,())0 5
Position i`danagentenl 151000 3 j
i I'erforntame Measurement 12,5!)1 3
i Invest men( Im entory 15,000 3
Job Cost Accounting 30,0)0 5
Exlended Support 22,5()) 50
l Tax Accounting 100,000 31t
Reporter No charge Included
I Inquiry 151000 3
Report Distribution 101000 3
I Personal Computer Graphics with Hardware 15,01)) 5
Personal Computer Graphics without Ila rdwato 5,000 5
i
11. TERM OF LICENSE AND RENEWAL
..The Initial term of the License is fifteen (15) years. At the end of this initial term, the licensee may renew the
License annually for a fee equal to two (2) percent of the initial term License Fee, i
111, NIAINTFiNANCE AND WARRANTY
The system Is warranted forone(1) year from the date of tic] iveryOf the sort ware. Anopt ionaI annual mainte-
nance service 4Irovides continued warrant); enhauuements, and Ielephone consultation, The Current annual
maintenance fees are;
LGF5 (On-line System) 515,OX1 l1westme111 Inventory 5 1,5t1t
Payroll/I'ersonncl Tanagement 8,500 Jot, Cost Aciounting 3, tick,
Faxed Assets 2, (W 'Ct\ Accounting 10,CV1)
Position Management 1,500 inquiry I"SW
Performance Measurement 1,250 Report Distribution i,0(ti1
1V. INSTALLATION AND SUPPORT
AMS will provide the above stated days of support to he used as customer desires for training, consulting or
installation and conversion support. Standard installation procedures and two (2) copies of all user and opera-
tional documentation are also provided by AMS. Reasonable travel, living and out-of-pocket expense to pro-
vide the support will bo billed to Licensee at AMS cost, including a ten (10) percent fee for associated
administrative costs, Additional training and support will he provided, if desired, M standard AMS rates for
consulting services. The current rate is $60 per hour,
i V TERMS OF PAYMENT OF SOFTWARE LICENSE FETE
75%R of License I've upon execution of License Agreement and delivery of Manal;c menf Guide, Procedures ~
Guide, Operations Guide, and Data Entry Guide.
I
25%n of License Fee upon delivery of the software.
Expense reimbursement or addilional support due upon receipt of monthly billing.
A finance fee of Iwo (2) percent per month will be clue for any announis nol paid within thirty (30) days
of due date,
NIM YORK n CI IICAGO n Dr.NVER n 1IOUS1'ON o SAN FRANCISCO
(21.1.) 618-0 ?00 1312) 269,0275 (3013) 989.7065 (713) 781.8310 (4151 595.46(X7
CITY OF DE.NTON
DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
July 24, 1984
Called meeting of the City of Denton
Advisory Board, Wednesday, July 25,
1984 at 600 P.M. at the City of Denton's
Data Processing office, 324 East McKinney.
Members Present; Gerald Cardwell
Dale Maddry
Ray Pittman
Members Absents Ronald McDade
Bill Shanks
Others Present: Charlotte Allen
Ann Bingman
Gary Collins
Mary Ramsey of the City Staff
Charlotte Allen, the City Secretary, swore in Ray Pittman to his
latest term as a member of the Data Processing Advisory Board.
The members present drew lots to determine the year their appoint-
meet to the Data Processing Board would expire, Ray Pi.tUran and
Gerald Cardwell drew odd years and therefore their terms will end
in 1985 and all other members appointments will expire in 1986.
The minutes of the June 11, 1984 meeting were received and there
being no changes to the minutes as written were approved.
After much discussion about the proposed upgrade of word processing
equipment to handle future growth and to relieve the immediate
limitations in the SJord Processing Center, Ray Pittman made a ;notion
to recommend the City of Denton Council approve thepropcsed upgrade
of the word processing equipment. Dal,, Maddry seconoed the motion
and the motion was passed unanimously, in the discussion, the ;members
of the Advisory Board indicated that they did not feel that word
processing matters were necessarily the province of this Board unless
the word processing equipment was going to be connected to the data
processing equipment via telephone lines or coaxial cables. It
was the feeling of the Board that these matters could be more
appropriately handled by coordination with the Director of Data
Processing and the Board need only be involved in those items the
Director of Data Processing would deem a patter for the Advisory
Board.
• Gary Collins discussed with the Board that the TRES contract
and AMS contract were both continuation of the Software Ma inter. ;:ro
contract associated with the City of Denton's Payroll/Personnel
System and Financial Sxstom respectively. Mr. Ray Pittman madu ~!)U
observation that he felt the Board has made a commitment to this
philosophy four years ago and felt the associated costa were much
less than costs of qualified programmers. Mr. Dale Madd.ry made
the observation that if annual release, new enhancements and corrections'
were not forthcoming for a period of time, then the City of Deal-.on
should consider the option of not renewing these maintenance ccntracts.
Gary Collins assured the Board that these type of enhancements,
releases and corrections had bean provided during the past year 3,1d
new releases of these systems wore planned for the upcoming yoar.
The Advisory Board unanimously reconunended the City of Demon's
council approve both of these software maintenance contrnr.ts,
Gary Collins informed the Board that Mr, Bill Shanks had writt,_=-% a
letter resigning his membership from the Data Processing
Board,
There bring no further business,the Data Processing Advisory 0,.:jrd
meeting was adjourned.
I
I
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TOt The Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMt Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works
DATEt August 2, 1984
SUBJECTt EXTENTION OF THE. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL CONTRACT
WITH THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH
As you know, we have been utilizing the Farmers Brnnch Landfall as our
primary disposal site for the trash collected on our residential and
commercial collection routes, The contract with the City of Farmers
Branch expired on July 31, 1984; however, they have offered to extend
this agreement under the same terms and conditions until our new site is
operational.
We would recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to
execute the necessary agreements extending this contract,
Bill Angelo
BA/sc
sw2
~IIul{fn.5 I~~'~y 1 j tµ {.11 I M nlx~ .{.r H`yt~ 42 ,ti y V
h' [ \ 11 i ✓ 1Zw" 1'F1~
((~.tI~ZFk,
t 1 n f 1 ~ , 1 1 5 . rv
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DENTON
SANITARY LANDFILL USE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City'of Farmers Branch, Dallas County, Texas,
a Home Rule City, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", Is the
Owner and operator of a sanitary landfill situated in Denton
County, known as the Camelot Landfill, hereinafter referred to
as "Landfill", which landfill site has been duly permitted by
the State of Texas; and
WHEREAS, The City of Denton, Texas hereinafter
referred to as "User" desires to contract with the Owner for the
use of the Landfill for the disposing of its refuse; and
WHEREAS, the Owner is willing to contract with the User to
make the Landfill available for disposal of its refuse;
THEREFORE, ABOVE PREMISFS CONSIDERED, and for and in consid-
eration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, it is agreed
by the parties as follows;
1. Use of Landfill. For the duration of the year
beginning on the 1st day of February ,
1984 and ending, on the 31st ay o July
19 84 unless sooner ter-
ninate as ereinafter provided, the Owner
shall permit the User to utilize the Owner's
y Landfill for the dumping of the User's refuse,
21 The User shall pay to the 0%'mer a monthly
charge based on the price of $ 1.13 per cubic
yard of allowable refuse dumped at the Landfill,
The Owner shall bill the User on or about the
first day of each month following the end of a
month wherein the User dumoeu refuse on the
Landfill, The User shall pay the Nmer within
ten (10) days of receipt of the monthly bill,
In the event the User fails to timely pay the
charges, the Oi,mer, at its discretion, may ter-
minate this contract by giving the User ten (10)
days written notice.
3, All of User's vehicles shall carry readily ascer-
tainable identification that is satisfactory to
Owner,
4, The User shall not dump hazardous wastes as defined
by the U.S, Environmental Protection Apenc and the
State of Texas Department of Health; barrels, tires,
auto or truck bodies,
5. The Owner shall keep the Landfill open to accept
User's refuse six (6) days a week, Monday thrpugh
Friday between the hours of 4-00,A,M, and 5;00 P.M
and Saturdays between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and
3:00 P.M., including all holidays, except December 25
(Christmas Day) and January l (New Xear'6 Day),
6, 'The owner shall construct and continually maintain
an all-weather road maintained in a good, smooth con-
dition from the public road throu,h the Landfill to
the dumping area. The Owner shah also construct and
continually maintain wet-weather disposal facilities
that will permit the site to be used during, rainy,
inclement weather,.
7, a; User shall comply with all rules of operation
established by Owner that are applicable to all
users of the Landfill site,
b. User estimates that the amount of monthly refuse
to be deposited at the site to be is'ooo cubic
yards.
8. All use of the Landfill is subject to applicable City,
County, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regula-
tions dealing, with the operation and use of a sanitary
landfill site,
01MER - City of Farmers Branch
Paul M, West, City Manaper
13000 b,m. Dodson Parkway
Farmers Branch, Texas 75234
I ,
Q~ CChia r nc. City Mannyer
City of Denton, Texas
EXECUTED this the
7k~1 day of f 19
OWNE,R, City of Farmers Branch
BY ;
au es y asta er
USER,
By! APPROVED AS TO FORM.
Q
ty to 0
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No,! H-32 Meeting Datet August 7, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicantt Keith Shelton
621 Grove St.
Denton, TX 76201
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Historic landmark (H) zoning
designation
Location: 621 drove St.
Existing Zoning: Multi-family (MF-1) classification C
Existing Land Use: Single family residential
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as Low intensity,
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Article 28A, Section 28 A-1, of the City of Denton Zoning Ordin-
ance defines a historic landmark as any building, structure,
site, district, area of architectural, historical, archaelogical
or cultural importance or value, which the city Council deter-
mines shall be protected, enhanced, and preserved in the interest!
of the culture, prosperity, education, and general welfare of the,
people.
Section 28 A-2 of the above referenced ordinance declares as pol-
icy the following purposes of the historic preservation ordinance,
related efforts:
1. To protect, enhance, and perpetuate historic landmarks which
represent or reflect distinctive and important elements of
tho city's and state's architectural, archaeological, cul-
tural, social, economic, ethnic: and political history and to
develop appropriate settings for such places.
(CasO4►fi-32)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
2. To safeguard the city's historic and cultural heritage, as
embodied and reflected in such historic landmarks by appro-
priate regulations.
3, To stabilize and improve property values in such locations.
4. To foster civic pride in the beauty and accompli,lhments of
the past.
6. To protect and enhance the city's attractions to tourists
and visitors and provide incidental support and stimulus to
business and industry.
6. To strengthen the economy of the city.
7. To promote the use of historic landmarks for the culture,
prosperity, education, and general welfare of the people of~
the city and visitors of the city.
ANALYSIS
This petition is the third request for historic landmark (H) zon-
ing designation in the Texas Woman's University area of the city.
The Planning and Zoning Commission and the city council approved
a similar request on the property immediately adjacent and west
of this site, 619 drove St„ in the fall of 1983. A request on
tract across the street from this site, 630 Drove St., was ap-
proved by the Planning and Zoning Commission but denied by the
City Council. Texas Woman's University opposed the second case
and similar opposition is expected this time.
The older and distinct residential character of this section of
the city is quite strong and worthy of every available protec-
tion. Historic preservation could bring added attention to
Development Guide policies demanding protection and preservation
of existing housing stock in older neighborhoods. Since this
area is zoned multi-family, historic (H) zoning could serve to
protect this area from multi-family encroachment.
RECOMMENDATION
The Historic Landmark Commission recommended approval of H•-32 by
a vote of 6-0 at its meeting of May 14, 1984, and felt that the
(Case *H-3x)
Page Three
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
residence meets the following criteria for (H) zoning designa-
tion:
1. Character, interest or value as part of the development, her-
itage or cultural characteristics of the City of Danton,
State of Texas, or the United States,
2. Embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architec-
tural type or specimen,
3. Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites or areas
which are eligible for preservation according to a plan bas<►d
on architectural, historic or cultural motif,
I
4. Portrayal of the environment of a group of Poo is in an area
of history characterized by a distinctive arohiteotural
style,
5. Identification as the work of an architect or master builder
whose individual work has influenced the development of the
city,
6. Exemplification of the cultural, economic, social, ethnic or
historical heritage of the city, state or United States,
7, Identification with a person or persons who significantly
contributed to the culture at,d development of the city,
state or United States.
8. A building or structure that because of its location has
become of value to a neighborhood, community area or the
city.
9. Value as an aspect of community sentiment or public pride.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of H-32
by a vote of 7-0 at its meeting of June 13, 1984.
,
ALTERNATIVES
1, Approve petition
2. Deny petition
(Qa~Re ~1H~32)
Page Four
ATTACKMNNT8
1. Aerial
2. Petition
3. Historical Summary
4. Reply form totals
5. Property owner Gist
6, Minutea of Historio Landmark Commission meeting Of May 14,
1984
7. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June
13, 1984
I
05518
~~k. s .r 1rr V
v y
.
w^r _ ~ r
t
4 rK
• a1
wis&
a
71
+r b
r
p„
y y ' /
P ~
o
o
f w I ,
i
4•
~ YT
PETITION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK ASSIGNATION TO THE HISTORIC LANDMARi
COMMISSION, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, AND CITY COUNCIL OF DENTON, xE,'S
I/We, tha undersigned, owmer(s) of, or party(s) with financial interest
in, all property herein described, do hereby file this, my/our petition,
asking that the said property be designated as a historic landmark under
the provisions of Ordinance #80-30 of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texas. The said property is located at C f
and is more particularly described as follows:
7'-
I/We herewith tender the filing fee of twenty-five dollars ($25).
I/We authorize the City of Denton to place a sign or signs'on the above
property for public notification of the proposed historic designation.
Name , - - //,r'G~~ G s„
Address
City r' State
Phone 7 7/S
Submitted this, day of 198
HISTORIC LANDMAIM ZONING PETITION
City of Dontonl Tors{
SITE ADDRESSs r Y'U v L
CITY LOT & BLOCK OR LEGAL D SCYPTIONs
H C
F412 )AFT
tt - «
PRESENT USES ZONINGS
CONSTRUCTION/DESCRIPTIONS ;5,~ r `x
CONDITION t
t r N
EXTERIORt ^GCcI INTERIORS CCCd
(GOOD] FAIR, POOR
PPxSENT OWNERS ADDRESS
P>Cc'd
DATE BUILT: DATES AND E.YTENT OF ALTERATIONS/ADDITIONS:
ARCHITECTS BUILDER: r~~, L /
ORIGINAL OWNER,. )Asti -e be fit, G 0cd e
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE. OR PERIOD WITH DESCRIPTION OF ANY INNOVATIVE DESIGN f FEA=S 0
DETAILS, MATS'RIALS OR CRAFTSMANSHIP:
NATIONAL REGISTER? NATIONAL LANDMARK? %k' RECORDED TEBAS LANDMARK?
LOC SURVEYS OR REGOQNITION?
C ,f ! v
ADD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO SUPPORT CLAIM IN CHECKED CATEGORY$
Applicants Keith and Deborah Shelton
621 grove St,
Denton► Tx, 76201
Status of Applicants Occupant and Owner
Requested Actions Historic Landmark (H) Zoning Designation
Locations 621 Grove St.
Existing Zonings Multi-Family 1 (MF-1)
Existing Land Uses Single Family Residential
Denton Development Guides Area is designated as Low Intensity
Rationales As the applicant, I believe this Property meets
criteria 1,~'3s 6, 79 9, 11, 12 and 13 of the criteria to be
used in Historical Landmark Designation.
The house originally had four large roams and two baths, A
bedroom was added on the east side, and later (1970) another
bedroom and a breakfast room were added on the rear, The roof
line and the front of the house were not changed, The front
has a porch with gable roof over the entryway, The main roof
is gabled to the ends. There is a chimney on the west side of
the roof, There are eight windows across the front of the
house. Two windows face the front on the east side addition,
The house now has two large rooms across the front+ a bedroom
on the west rear, a bedroom-office on the east side, a kitchen,
the breakfast room and a bedroom on the north side and two
bathrooms in the center of the house.
It is of wood frame construction with brick chimney. The foundation
is on hardwood Piers.
At one time, the house, according to Joe Jagoe, was on Pecan
Creek+ which had a grist mill on it at one time. The creek has
been rechanneled. The grist mill was a landmark in the area,
1 J\lJ
r t
History of the Property at 621 Grove $t., Denton
Patent No. 963, Vol. 2 of the Records of Patent of Denton County,
Texas, filed for record on Oct. 91 1876, conveys the property from
the State of Texas to the BBB&C Railway Co, it was transferred in 1854.
It included 640 acres, and was granted by virtue of land scrip
issued in 1853.
In 1858, the railroad authorized Otis G. Welch and Joseph A. Carroll,
two of Denton's pioneer attorneys, to sell the land. It was duly sold
in 1869 to C.C. Bell for $510. Bell paid $260 cash and made two notes
for $100 to be paid in one year and $150 payable in two years at 108.
Provision was made for a 30-foot street on the west side. Part of the
land became the A.E. Sell Addition and part the Schmitz and Rippy
Addition. The portion Bell purchased actually was 72 1/3 acres of the
640. C.C. Bell and his wife A.E. Bell designated as their homestead
a Fortion of the land from the north of Congress Avenue and the east
of Bell Avenue in 1882.
In 1880, the Bells conveyed 28 feet off the east aide to the city for
Bell Avenue for $50.
In subsequent years, parcels were sold by the Bells to G.B. Collins,
J.P. Justus, the city of Denton for a street (in 1898).
The land was subsequently divided and sold through history until on
Nov. 2, 1921, Lot 2, Block 1 of Woodland Addition was sold by J.D.
Rates and his wife Cora to James Goode and his wife Elizabeth.
A mechanics lien was entered Aug. 7, 1924, to R.C. McCormick, contractor,
to construct using his own plans a five-room frame house for $800 down
and $2,800 on Oct. 1, the house to be completed within 60 days from
Aug. 7, 1924, The lien was released by McCormick on Oct. 19, 1925.
The house and lot subsequently passed into the ownership of this
applicant, James Keith Shelton and Deborah Kennedy Shelton.
The land ownership has involved some of the earliest historical figures
of the city of Denton. The house is of a style of the times, a style
which is quickly disappearing from the city.
-
I
3
1 ~ 1~ ~ 17 y
F ~ir0 r I 'F'
E ,
3 6 I
i~e~ a an'e h 1
y 61? C+ro-cr florlllR S A i> 1
I
r; l ~ro6P LIPIdi11 761e I
IA 64'~~Pr S
600 G ?6 r
I' ~I•ey~ ~ r .S '
ru AId„
.5"t'nTI'dh ~1Pn11) n
15
I y Si ,n Q 6 rJ
a aiI rn I
I I
- I I
PROPER'T'Y' OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
H-32
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Wallace Woolsey Robert 0, Senfield
619 Grove Vice President for
Denton, Texas Fiscal Affairs
TWU
Aline Wolters P, 0, Sox 23955-TWU Station
600 Grove Denton, Texas 76204
Denton, Texas
Robert Castleberry
627 Grove
Denton, Texas
Douglas Ebersole
630 Grove
Denton, Texas
Minutes
Historic Landmark Commission
May 14, 1984
The regular meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission of the
City of Denton, Texas, was veld on Monday, Matt 14, 1984, at
400 p.m ,o in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building,
Present: Randall 5, Boyd, Mary D, Hardin, Sam Kingsbury,
Michael Lawrence, Bullitt Lowry, Carroll Rich and
Jim T. Wheeler
.absents Samuel J, Marino, Sandra A. Matthews and Tom Polk
Miller
Present from Staffs Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner,
and Debbie Boydston, secretary
Chairperson Mary Hardin called the meeting to order,
T. Minutes
A, Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of
March 12, 1984
B. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of
April 16, 1984
Mr, Lowry inade a motion to approve the minutes of the
regular meetings of March 12, 1984 and April 16, 1984,
Seco,ided by Mr. Kingsbury and unanimously carried (6-0).
II, Public Hearing
1H1-a-Toric 4 -32. This is the petition of Keith Shelton requesting
4 landmark (H) zoning designation at 621 Grove Street.
Mr. Shelton stated that he didn't have much to add to
his previous presentation at the regular meeting of
April 16, which he stated he and his wife Deborah are
the property owners at 621 Grove Street and at one time
the house, according to Joe Jagoe, was on Pecan Creek,
He stated the abstract states the property is located
two miles out on a creek and added had a grist mill on
the property and was a landmark in the area, He stated
that the property is surrounded on three sides by Texas
Woman's University and is in one of the older neighbor-
hoods in Denton. He also stated his interest in this
type of zoning is to preserve the neighborhood, which
are older homes occupied by the owners, and in his opin-
ion the neighborhood is worth preserving, He added that
the style of his home, built by Mr, R.C. McCormick, in
1924, was the typical style of the day, He added the
roof line was basically the same and is gabled to the
ends of the house, He stated there is a chimney on the
west side of the roof and a bedroom was added on the east
HLC Minutes
page 2
side of the house and two rooms were added on the back,
Ms, Martha Swain stated she like living in her modest
home in the same neighborhood as Mr, Shelton, which she
added was typical of the homes built in the 20's and she
stated she would be in favor of historical type zoning
as she feels it would better preserve the neighborhood,
No one spoke in opposition.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Commission discussed criteria to be used in historic
landmark designation.
Mr. Boyd made a motion to recommend approval of H-32
and to approve the criteria accepted and discussed at
the regular meeting of April 16, 1984, which included:
1, Character, interest or value as part Of the develop-
ment, heritage or cultural characteristics of the
City of Denton, State of `riexas, or the United States.
2, Embodiment of distinguishi,:g characteristics of an
architectural type or specimen,
3. Identification as the work of an architect or master
builder whose individual work has influenced the
development of the city.
4. Relationship to other distinctive buildings, sites
areas which are eligible for preservation according
to a plan based on architectural, historic or cultural
motif,
5, portrayal of the environment of a group of people in
an area of history characterized by a distinctive
architectural style,
6. E>;emplification of the cultural, economic, social,
ethnic or historical heritage of the city, state or
United States.
7, Identification with a person or persons who signif:.-
cantly contributed to the culture and development o:
the city, state or United States,
8. A buildina or structure that because of its locati~_-n
has become of value to a neighborhood, community area
or the city.
9, Value as an aspect of community sentiment or public
pride.
HLC Minutes
Pago 3
Seconded by Mr, Kingsbury,
Chair asked for roll call voter Aye - 61 Nay - 0,
Motion passed unanimously (6-0),
Mr, wheeler commented the commission does not want to
antagonize TWU to the point that this neighborhood be-
comes a target area,
Mr, Rich stated he feels the commission needs to be
prepared to defend the historic zoning cases before
City Council,
Mr, Lowry commented he fears the threat of these older
homes being bought and torn down by developers.
Mr. Shelton stated there are a lot of older people in
this neighborhood that are dying and their property is
left to deteriorate and further stated it his interest
to preserve his home and in hopes, the neighborhood.
Mr. Rich commented if a fair number of buyers and owners
take interest to preserve this area it could be designated
as a pocket of history. He further commented that TWU
does not implement the school's major plan and for the
past decade the school's have not had the boom they once
had to develop. 0
On question from Mr, Rich, Ms. Spivey stated the area
is designated as low intensity acco..,ding to the Denton
Development Guide.
Mr, Lowry stated that the city has no government over a
state institution,
TIY, Considerations
A. Progress report on letter to realtors, contractors,
etc., to familiarize them with the procedure and th-
possibilities of receiving comment from HLC before
seeking landmark designation.
Ms. Spivey stated staff is attempting to prepare a list
to send to developers, realtors, contractors, etc., to
explain historic zoning and the value of it.
Mr. Rich stated that most people who apply for historic:
landmark designation are private home owners who after
remodeling or adding on to their home have ruined their
chance for historic zoning.
B. Progress report on preservation plan.
Mr. Lowry stated the plan is very near completion. He
needs a couple of hours to put on the finishing touches.
P & Z Minutes
June 13, 198+
Page 2
C. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Patio Garden
Homes Addition
D. Approval of the preliminary and final plat of the
Pecan Forrest Addition
Mr. Escue made a motion to approve the consent agenda.
Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (6-0).
III. Approval of an ordinance amending Chapter 13 of Appendix
B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Den-
ton to provide for the use of lots with less than the
minimum area, width or depth requirements when such lots
are approved through the subdivision process; repealing
all ordinances in conflict therewith; and providing for
an effective date,
Mr, Ellison stated the reason for amending the ordinance
is to forward the commission's recommendation to the Coun-
cil and to let them consider to approve a lot without
approval of the Board of Adjustments and to have one
uniform procedure with the criteria being the eight (8)
conditions listed in the Subdivision Regulations, He
stated the effective date would come from the Legal
Department,
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of an
ordinance amending Chapter 13 of Appendix B-Zoning of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton to provide
for the use of lots with less than the minimum area,
width or depth requirements when such lots are approved
through the subdivision process. Seconded by Mr. Escue
and unanimously carried (6-0).
Mr. Juren arrived at the meeting.
IV. Public Hearings
A.(--H,-32. This is the petition of Keith Shelton request-
ing historic landmark (H) zoning designation at 621
Grove Street, The property is more particularly
described as lot 2 and the west 11 feet of lot 1,
block 2, of the Woodland Addition.
Ms, Spivey stated there were 9 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet; p were returned in
favor and 1 in opposition,
' P & z Minutes
June 13, 1984
page 3
Mr. Keith Shelton stated he and his wife Deborah
Evans Shelton are the property owners at 62t Grove
and this case is similar to the case of Mr. and Mrs.
A.W. Woolsey which the commission recently approved.
He stated he is currently in the process of organiz-
ing a neighborhood association trying to preserve
this neighborhood, He stated most o£ the people in
the neighborhood live in and own their own homes and
stated his major request was to preserve the neigh-
borhood,
on question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Shelton stated the
foundation was not pier and beam but huge wooden
plies and that it was the type built in that era,
He stated further, that no architect was used,
Mary Hardin, chairman for the Historic Landmark Com-
mission, stated she would hope the commission would
vote in favor as she stated we are looking at a
neighborhood and a way of life at the turn of the
century. She stated the Historic Landmark Commission
did vote unanimously to recommend approval and would
hope the commission would also.
Mr. Bullitt Lowry, vice-chairman of the Historic
Landmark Commission stated three or four weeks ago
Denton had a person visiting from the National
Register and was enthusiastic about this area becom-
ing a National Register district much like West Oak,
Grove, and Vine Streets and the Denton Square area.
TWU opposed a similar case across the street, but not
next door to the proposed property. He stated until
TWU makes a substantial offer to the owners, they
should have the right to do what they can to their
property to preserve it,
on question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Lowry stated the
owners can sell property with historic zoning if
TWU makes an offer.
No one spoke in opposition.
Ms. Spivey stated this is the third request in the
TWU area for historic landmark (H) zoning designa-
tion. She stated the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council approved a similar request on the
P 4 Z Minutes
June 13, 1984
Page 4
property immediately adjacent and west of this site,
619 Grove Street, in the fall of 1983. A request on
a tract across the street from this site, 630 Grove
Street, was approved by the Planning and Zoning Com-
missi,n but denied by the City Council. Texas
Woman s University opposed the second case and
similar opposition is expected this time. She stated
the older and distinct residential character of this
section of the city is quite strong and worthy of
every available protection. Historic preservation
could bring added attention to Development Guide
policies demanding protection and preservation of
existing housing stock in older neighborhoods, Since
this area is zoned multi-family, historic (H) zoning
could serve to protect this area from multi-family
encroachment. She stated the Historic Landmark Com-
mission recommended approval of H-32 by a vote of
6-0 at its meeting of gay 14, 1984, and felt that the
residence meets the criteria for historic zoning
designation. Staff recommends approval of H-32.
Chairman declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of H-32.
LSeconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried (7-0).
B. S-179. This is the petition of Wanda and Ricky Cloud
requesting a specific use permit for a single mobile
home to be used as a temporary dwelling unit while a
permanent structure is being constructed. The 2.1
acre tract, which is zoned agricultural (A), is lo-
cated on they south side of Audra Lane approximately
2,000 feet west of Mockingbird Lane.
Ms. Spivey stated there were 5 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of subject property;
1 was returned in favor and 1 in opposition.
Mr. Ricky Cloud stated the subject property is zoned
agricultural and just a temporary dwelling until he
can get his house built within the three year time
limit and probably sooner. He stated he didn't feel
it would devaluate any of the neighbors surrounding
property.
NO,
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 621 GROVE STREET IN THE CITY OF DENTON,
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER ORDINANCE NO.
80-30 (ARTICbE 28A OF THB COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE)I AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and
Zoning Commission of the City of Denton have recommended that the
property herein described be designated as a historic landmark in
the city of Denton+ NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION__ I_.
That the following described property, to-wit:
All that Certain lot, tract of parcel of land situated in
the City and County of Denton, State of TONbS, described
as Lot 2 and the west 11 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Woodland
Addition and known as 621 Grove Street, Denton, Texas,
is hereby designated as a historic landmark under Ordinance No,
80-301 Article 28A of the Comprehensive Zoning ordinance of the
City of Denton, Texas,
SECTION 11.
That said property herein described shall be indicated upon
the zoning map Of the City of Denton as a historic landmark, by the
letter 'H', and the property herein described shall be subject to
all of the terms, provisions and requirements of Ordinance Na,
80-30, Article 28A of the Comprehensive Zoning ordinance of the
City Of Denton, Texas and such designation shall be in addition to
any other use designation established in the City's coning
ordinance applicable to such property.
SECTION 111.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its date
of passage,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1484,
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
'Q ►
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To; Denton City Council
Case No,: S-180 Meeting Date: August 7, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Mr, W. D. Byrne
Y,M,C,A, of Metropolitan Dallas
601 N, Akard
Dallas, TX 75201
Status of Applicant: Y,M,C,A Representative
Requested Action; Requesting a specific use permit to
allow the operation of a Y,M,C,A,
facility on agriculturally (A) zoned
property
4
Location and Size: An 8,S acre tract located at the
northwest corner of Windsor Dr, and
Riney Road
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family residences,
vacant; A
South - Single family residences,
vacant; SF-10, A
East - Single family residences,
vacant; SF-7, A
West - North Lakes Park; A
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity,
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: Drainage is not a major consideration
at this site. Drainage facilities
were installed when Windsor Dr, was
built. Detention ponds in adjacent
North Lakes Park also help to control
drainage in this area. Any drainage
should go to North Lakes.
(Case Y S-180)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Co,,.inued)
Utilities, Water and sewer lines are available
from Windsor Dr. Electric, gas and
telephone service can also be provide
to this site.
Transportation: This tract has frontage on Windsor
Dr,)an improved secondary major
arterial, The developer will be
required to improve one half of Riney
Rd, along the frontage of the
property,
ANALYSIS
Low intensity area policies encourage some land use diversity if
protection of the neighborhood and adjacent housing 15 provided,
but discourages concentrations of multi-family, office, commer-
cial and other higher density/intensity uses. There are five (S
criteria that diverse land uses should meet when proposed in a
low intensity residential area. These criteria are as follows:
1. Strict site design within one block of existing low densitZ
res ent ali is, ~ ac,yi ed. This is a specific use request;
therefore, onditions and development requirements can be
attached before occupancy occurs. There is ample room to
develop parking and access and a six (6) foot solid wood
fence can be required along property lines abutting
residences to provide adequate screening and reduce noise
levels.
2. The overall density/intensity standard is not violated due
to the amount undeveloped property in this area. Y
3. Traffic planning ensures access by a collector street or
larger and not through local ow esis ty streets. The site
does meet this criteria as access is provided through Riney
Rd., a collector street.
4. Sufficient green area for recreational facilities is
provided, This 81%;r e tract as sufficient space or t e
propose athletic fields.
5. Input into planning by the neighborhood. It is difficult to
ascertain the egree o input solicited by the petitioner or
offered by neighbors when staff is r-)t directly involved.
(Case 0 S-180)
Page Three
R''LCOMMBNDATION
The site is accessed by a collector street or largeri the 8.5
acre site does provide ample room for parking and access, The
overall intensity/density standard is not violated and the tract
is adjacent to North Lakes Park, a very compatible dofse.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval
by a vote of 7-0 with the following conditions:
1. No detached signs shall be permitted.
2. A permanently maintained six (6) foot solid wood fence shall
be erected along the north proplperty lines.
3. fThe acilityngissnotlderevert velopedobygtheuendrof aAthre+etyear.period,
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the petition with additional conditions
2. Approve the petition without conditions
3. Approve petition with conditions
4. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. Specific Use Permit Concept Plan
3. Reply form totals
4. Property owner list Commission
5. Minutes of the July 11, 1984 Planning and Zoning
meeting
064lg
~►,`7►'s,' a
.'ev 41
gy. t o s
• yr
r
i - .
VTR,
w
'
y '
A
'r
,r„r
r ,
WIN ono i
i
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN
Y,M,C,A.OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS
DENTON BRANCH f - - - - - -
"
i
I
ATHLE IC FIELDS
GYM "
I-_ POOL
I I ADMIN
I ov 11111 OFF, -1- -jTTf f) f.
PARKING 40 CARS
RINEY ROAD WAt.I V agwUs ..~,.f~
-lRo
i
l J Z ' KK Attu
31
! (or 4
JUG , ~ Iry
a -
1,.,h, 4
i J
.10
-09
- - - _2 46,13
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL,
S-180
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received Patrick E. Parker
1128 Riney Road
Denton, Texas
E. Deats Headlee
418 Magnolia
Denton, Texas
I
P & z Minu es
July 11, 184 M
Page 15
Chair declared public hearing closed,
Mr, Escue made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-107b. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried
(7-U).
E. S-160. This is the petition of W. D. Byrne, repre-
senting the Y,M.C.A6 of Metropolitan Dallas, requesting
a specific use permit on an 8.59 acre tract located at
the northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Riney Road,
if approved, the specific use permit would allow the
development of a Y.M.C,A. facility.
Mr, Lllison stated there were 10 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 2UU feet of the subject property;
1 was returned in opposition and zero in favor,
Mr. W.D, Byrne stated he was representing the Y.M,C.A.
and would ask that the commission approve the proposal.
Bill Highland, stated he is the director of the Y.M.C.A.
in Denton and has been for three years. He stated the
current membership is close to 2,000 children and a
facility of this nature would be very favorable.
Ralph Morrison, ilb SouthridgeI stated this will add
prestige and a place for the neighborhood children,
John Wier, a new area resident, stated he has just
signed a contract on his home and is concerned about
the proposed parking lot.
Mr Dane, an area resident, stated he thought the
proposed was a very good idea. He stated his question
was in regard to Riney Road.
Mr. Ellison stated perimeter street paving would apply.
Mr. Ellison also stated low intensity area policies
encourage some land use diversity if protection of the
neighborhood and adjacent housing is provided, but
discourages concentrations of multi-family, office,
commercial and other higher density/intensity uses. He
stated there are five (5) criterian that diverse land
uses should meet when proposed in a low intensity
residential area. He stated the site is accessed by a
collector 13treet or larger; the 8.5 acre site does
provide ample room for parking and access, The overall
intensity/density standard is not violated and the tract
is adjacent to North Lakes Park, a very compatible land
use. He stated staff recommends approval of S-180 with
conditions.
yutyZl~inwo$#
Page 16
Chair declared public hearing cloned,
Mr, Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of 5-16U
with the following conditionst
1. No detached signs shall be permitted other than a
scoreboard sign.
2. A permanently maintained six (6) foot solid wood
fence shall be erected along the north property
lines,
3. The zoning shall revert to agrir.ultural (A) if the
Y.M,G.A. facility is not developed by the end of a
three period,
Seconded by Mr. Claiborne and unanimously carried (7-U).
1.
F. Approval of the final replat of the Adkisson Addition
(Denton County Jail).
Mr. Ellison stated this 21.9 acre tract is located on
the west side of Woodrow Lane approximately 30' south of
!vast McKinney Street. The tract also has 6U' frontage
on East McKinney Street. He stated the property is
zoned general retail ((;K) and munti-family (iKF-1) and
will be the site of the new county jail. He stated
water and sewer service is available to the property and
as and electric service will be available in the
future. A 60' right-of-way runs through the center of
the property and is to be abandoned in conjunction with
this plat. He further stated the petitioner did comply
with the access restrictions and one driveway on East
McKinney is proposed. Staff recommends approval.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to request.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Eacue made a motion to recommend approval of the
final replat of the Adkisson Addition (Denton County
Jail). Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried
(7-U).
G. Approval of the final replat of the Lincoln Park
Addition.
140,
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A YMCA CtLITY1
PROVIDING FOR THE REFERENCING OF SUCH USE 00 THE ZONINb MAP OF
THE CITY OF DEHTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDtX TO
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY
ORDINANCE NO, 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APYROXIMA7£LY
8.$90 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTOH, TEXAS; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE PATE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI
SECTION I.
The Zoning Classification and Use designation of the follow-
ing described property, to-wLts
SITUATED in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and reing
a tract of land in the N. H, Meisenheimer Survey, Abstract No.
810, and being a portion of that certain tract described as 4.20
acres in 'Exhibit A' in deed recorded in Volume 885, Page 619 of
the Deee Records of Denton County, Tex39, and said portion reing
more fully described as foliowsi
BEGINNING at an iron rod set for the point of intersection of
the present north line of~ Windsor Dirve (01d Sanger Road) with
the present west line of ineY Road, said point of intorse,tion
bei'%9 as defined by R,O,W, acquisition by the City of Dento:i;
THENCE north 89001' west with said north line of Windsor :irve,
as defined by said R.O.W. acquisition, 144.32 feet to an iron
rod aet at the point of intersection of said north line with the
southwesterly line of said 9.20 acres and the northeasterl, line
of that certain tract conveyed to the City of Denton as rra,t I
In deed recorded in Volume 697, Page 207 of said Deed Recorder
THENCE north 34°50155' west .)id common line between said
9,20 acre tract and said City L. Denton tract, 1038,38 feat to
an iron rod in place for the m~rthwest corner of said 9.20: acre
tract and the northeast corner of said City of Denton Tract I;
THENCE south 88°45130' east with a fence along the common line
between said 9,20 acre tract and that certain 49,622 acre 'Tract
B' in said deed in Volume 885, page 619 of said Deed Records,
741.46 feet to an iron rod in place for the northeast corner of
said 9,20 acre tract In the west fence line of said Riney t¢asds
THENCE south 0012120' west with said west fence line of Ciney
Road and with the east line of said 9,20 acre tract, 809.3$ feet
to an iron rod set at the point of intersection of said west
line with the most northerly north line of said City of Benton
R,O,W, acquisitions
THENCE north 89055115' west with said most northerly nortt: line
of R.L,W, acquisition, 6,50 feet to an iron rod set for the most
northerly northwest corner of said R.O,W, acquisitions
THENCE south 0004'25' west with a west line of said F.o.W.
acquislton and said present west line of Riney Road, 29.20 feet
to the place of beginning and containing 8.590 acres.
S-1801W. D. BYRNE/PAGE 1
which is classified as Agricultural 'A' District Classification
usv under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Denton, Texas is hereby granted for the use of said property a
specific use permit for a YMCA Facility, sub3eot to the follow-
ing conditions and restrictions to-wits
1. No detached signs shall be permitted other than a
ecOreboardt
2. A permanently maintained six (611 foot solid wood
fence shall be erected along the north property
linest
3. This specific use permit shall expire if the YMCA
Facility is not completed within three ( 3) years
from the effective date of this ordinance.
4. The development of the property shall us in
substantial compliance with the site plan attached
hereto and made a part hereof (of all purposes.
SECTION 11,
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the code of
j
j Ordinances of the City of L'enton, Texas lender Ordinance No,
69-10 shall be referenced to show the property herein described
being granted a specific use permit for the use approved herein,
SECTION III.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby
finds that such use is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the city of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving
the Value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and
encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum
benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION IV.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the planning and Zoning
S-180/W. U. BYRNE/PAGE 2
Commission ano the City Council of the City of Denton, Teias,
attar giViuq due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1984.
RICHARD 0, F-M-KI-M-M-07
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
(!HARLO T ALLE , CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTOkNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY; ~ )
TI-
5-180/W. D. BYRNE/PAGE I
I
I
PROPOSED PLOT PLAN
Y,M.C,A.OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS
DENTON BRANCH
ATHLE IC FIELDS
x
I ~ I
,
L- POOL ` GYM
f- ff - -
f I ADMIN 1 - - - -
11-FF-l.}TITI .i-i._f_1_1
PARKING 40 CARS
rrn i
I RINEY ROAD SCAH I' vijuils
41, ,
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton city council
Case No.: Z-1670 Meeting Date: August 7, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: aoorge R. Scogyin
3116 Brighton Dr,
Denton, TX 76205
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the single
family (SF-7) classification to the
two-family (2F) classification
Purpose: Construction of ten (10) duplexes
Location and Size: Approximately one acre located at. the
intersection of Jacqueline and Willow
wood Streets.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Southside Baptist Church; SF-
South - Single family residential;
SF-7
East - Apartments; MF-1
West - Single family residential;
SF-7
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as moderate inten-
sity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Public Utilities: Water and sewer lines are available
for extension to this site. Elec-
tric, gas and cable TV service is
available to the site.
(Cane # x-1670)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Transportation; Willowwood is an unimproved collector
street with 60 feet of right-of-way,
Drainage; Drainage does not a pear to be a
major problem at this site,
Applicable Regulations; Parking; Two spaces for each dwell-
ing unit are required for two family
land use.
Minimum setbacks; Front - 25 feet,
Side - 6 feet, Rear - 6 feet
Minimum Lot Width: 60 feet
Minimum Lot Depth: 100 feet
maximum percentage of lot which may
be covered by buildings: 40 percent
ANALYSIS
This site is located in a moderate intensity area, Denton De-
velopment Guide policies encourage diversified housing in all
sectors of the city. There is already single family (SF-7) and
multi-family (MF-1) housing in this section of the city and du-
plexes would help to diversify the housing market in this area.
These duplexes could also serve as a buffer between the single
family residences to the west and the multi-family and commercial
development to the east of this property.
If approved, this proposal would permit the development of a
maximum of ten duplexes. Willowwood, a collector street with 60
feet of right-of-way, has adequate capacity to serve this devel-
opment but must be improved in accordance with City of Denton
Subdivision Regulations. Public utilities are adequate to serve
this development.
RECOMMENDATION
At the Planning and zoning commission public hearing of June 27,
1984 many neighbors registered their disapproval of the proposed
duplex project. Some concerns registered were drainage, traffic,
and the proposed height of the buildings (two-story).
(Case NZ-1670)
Page Throe
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
As a result of these factors and concerns, the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends denial of Z-1670 by a vote of 5-1,
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. Reply form totals
3. Property owner list
4. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June
27, 1984
0630a
t
r
t
,
4
A ~■3y- A •
f f1 ~ r
40
y
~y A
O ~ J A■*s w
t 4 R ~ f
M1
"F
f ~ s
e 4
150
/IV
r
Awl, AA/
r
Al
16
Ole
.Y I
ro
E
/ell
-11 W I Ala
- ~Jk~)Ooll
-
{ f
ll
,4a~ I!0 ~~~CWeeol L?.. fw„ r16
41
I ZA12kL
I f
bid
-rig
Vii)
: 41.
.~waay+- ♦.k. ti(+1.<'„ M,•:,gv~01r.<7 t
I
j
• i
761 L
10 1
I 1
~ I
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
2-1670
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNNDE.,CIDID
Raymond L, Williams E. R. Riley
Route 1, Box 433 926 VJillowwood
sulphur, Oklahoma 73086 Denton, Texas
Jack 0, Kiser
1903 Mercedes
Denton, Texas
Duaine & Patricia Whitaker
1110 Oakwood
Denton, Texas
Carl & Julia Ferre
1107 Oakwood
Denton, Texas
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1984
Page 13
districts. The area is also directly east of the major
dominant commercial center (Golden Trian le Mall area)
as access to
desinated by the Development Guide and
1-351, a primary major arterial. She further stated a
portion of this property as designated by the Cit
Council as a blighted area to encourage industrial use.
She stated staff feels that the ratio of commercial to
light industrial could be more equitable but this
reservation is not signiBfaiccaandtonnehehreouestosmend
com-
denial of the request land use and typical
patibility with surrounding
moderate activity center uses, staff recommends approv-
al of Z-1669.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1669. Seconded by Mss Cole and unanimously carried
(6-0) .
E. z-1670. This is the petition of George D. Scoggin
requesting a change in zoning from the single family
(SF-7) classification to the two family (2F) classifi-
cation at the northeast corrneofi ood Street and
partcularly
lots rty 8is more
described as lots. The property
Jacqueline
-12, block C, of the
described as lots 1-5,
Wylie H. Barnes Addition.
Ms. Spivey stated there were 32 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of the subject property;
1 was returned in favor and 6 in opposition.
Mr. George Scoggin stated he is a Denton resident and
works in Dallas as a realtor and is fasking amily for achange
classif-
in zoning from single family
ication. He stated he was planning to build duplexes
and to sell them as the market trends are to buy
and live in one side and rent out the other side.
On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Scoggin stated the
type of exterior facade would be wood siding. He stated
he decided to build two story, with two bedru•-%ms and a
bathroom upstairs with all parking in the rear of the
buildings under carports.
J.D. Tadloclc, 1911 Mercedes, stated this type of
of the homes in the
dwelling would in,jurethe
brick,
neighborhood as they were
P & Z Minutes
June 27, 1984
Page 14
Betty wood, 1909 Jacqueline, stated she feels it would
over crowd the neighborhood,
Jerry Sims 1914 Mercedes, stated he lives on the south
side of Willowwood and that apartments are already in
doesn't c need to l be any d moand stated re crowding he of feels the area.
Keva Friedsom, 1403 Kendolph, stated she feels the major
problem is drainage,
Mr. Clark stated with any improvements to Willowwood, it
would increase flow of water to run-off of the prop-
erty, He further stated that any development to the
property would better the drainage problem.
Robert Conlin, 2114 Jacqueline, stated the children
traveling to school down an already busy street was his.
main concern.
Janie Stauffacher, 1106 Oakwood, stated she wants the
neighborhood to remain a quite neighborhood and stated
she was against this type of housing, She stated she
had not even seen a site plan and therefore doesn't know
what he is going to build.
Harold Curtison, an area resident, stated his opposition
was to building two-story buildings. He stated this
neighborhood is single family homes and single stories.
Carl Ferre 1107 Oakwood, stated he would like to see
single family homes built there.
Charles Fedder, 1116 Oakwood, stated he didn't think
two-story buildings would help the neighborhood,
however, he would not oppose one-story buildings.
Robert Whitaker, 1110 Oakwood, stated he bought in the
area because his house was on a dead-end street and he
stated he was very opposed to the proposed.
Ms. Spivey stated this site is located in a moderate
intensity area. Denton Development Guide policieo
encourage diversified housing in all sectors of the city;
there is already single family (SF-7) and multi~tamily
(MF-1) housing in this section of the city and duplexes
would help to diversify the housing market in this
She stated these duplexes could also serve as a
area.
buffer between the single family residences to the west
this
hi
and the multi-family development to the east of t
P & 2 Minutes
June 27, 1984
Page 15
property. She stated if approved, this proposal would
permit the development of a maximum of ten duplexesi
She stated Willowwood is a collector street with 60 of
to serve this
right-of•way and has adequate capacity
development but must be imppl1roved in accordance with City
Subdivision
adequate She stated
Dinton
uti
She further stated as reported on several previous
occasions, many duplexes developed today are practically
identical to single family detached structures inasmuch
as architecture and aesthetics are concerned. She
stated many duplexes are platted separately for in-
dividual sale and owner occupancy. Staff recommends
approval of Z-1670.
Mr. Scoggin in reb-.ittal, stated the main opposition
seemed to be the drainage and the City Engineer has
stated would be improved with development. He stated
the church wanted to extend the proposed street all the
way through to Willowwood rather than a cul-de-sac.
With the dosign that he is proposing and on today's
market, he stated he shouldn't have any problems selling
the duplexes especially since they are proposed to be
built with wood exteriors.
Chairman declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1670. Motion failed for lack of second.
Mr. Sidor made a motion torden aib1670. oSeconded by Mr.
Escue and carried 5-1.
F. Z-1671. This is the petition of Mr. J.E. McClellan
requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD) clas-
sification at the northwest corner of Cottonwood Lane
and U.S. Highway 380. The property is more particularly
described as lot 37 of the Denton Estates Mobile Home
Addition. If approved, the planned development will
permit the construction of mini-warehouses on this site.
Ms. Spivey stated there were 14 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of subject property; 1
was returned in favor, 2 were returned in opposition and
1 undecided.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1675 Meeting Date: August 7, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Christopher Bancroft
1621 N, Elm
Denton, TX 76201
Status of Applicant: Financial Interest
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricul-
tural (A) classification to the
planned development: (PD) classifica-
tion. If approved, the planned
development will permit the develop-
ment of 71 lots for single family
detached use (minimum lot size 7000
square f.eet)and a private school
Location and Size: 19.39 acre tract located on the
south side of Highland Park Road
approximately 1500 feet east of
Bonnie Brae Road
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family residential,
vacant; SP-7, A
South - Single family residential,
vacant; A
East - Single family residential,
vacant; A
West - Single family residential,
vacant; A
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity.
(Case N Z-1675)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: Drainage is a significant considera-
tion with this development. A 30"
storm drainage pipe must be installed
along the south property line and
downstream owners must grant permis-
sion for drainage onto their property.
Public Utilities; Sewer service is available from an
existing 18" trunk line which runs
along the south roperty line. There
is an existing J pro-rata water line
in Highland Park Road that the
developer will tie into an internal
loop system for this development.
Electric, gas and telephone services
are available to the site.
Transportation; The tract has frontage on Highland
Park Road, an unimproved collector
street. The developer will be
responsible for improving half of
Highland Park Road and providing
internal residential streets for the
development.
ANALYSIS
This site is located in a low intensity area. According to the
Denton Development Guide, low intensity areas represent the
primary housing areas of the City and should emphasize residen-
tial use. This proposal with 71 single family detached lots,
minimum size 7000 square feet (SF-7), obviously matches that
definition.
This proposal is located immediately south of the Laurel Addi-
tion, on existing SF-7 subdivision. The proposed use is a
logical continuation of the already existing use to the north,
The second section of the planned development is a two acre
parcel at the southwest corner of the tract to be reserved for a
private school. In low intensity areas, staffs applies Denton
Development Guide policies which encourage some land use diver-
sity if protection of the neighborhood and adjacent housing is
l
(Case 04.1675)
Page Three
ANALYSIS (Continued)
provided, but discourages concentrations of multi-family, office,
commercial and other higher density and higher intensity uses.
There are five (5) key criteria that diverse or non-low density
land uses should meet when proposed in a low intensity residon-
tial area. These criteria area as follows:
1. Strict site design control within one block of existing low
density residential is provided, This is a p Anne eve op-
ment request. pec c conditions and development require-
ments can be attached before occupancy occurs. There is
ample room to develop parking and access and a six (6) foot
solid wood fence can be required along property lines abut-
ting residences to provide adequate screening and reduce
noise levels.
2. The overall density/intensity standard is not violated due
to the small scale of this proposal and the presence of a
significant amount of undeveloped property in the area.
3. Traffic planning ensures access b4 a collector street or
larger and not t rou~ ow density treets.. -Thfs site
does not meet this criteria as access is prow ed through
Horn Street, a local low density street.
d. Sufficient green space area for recreational facilities is
pro_vf ed. This two acre tract provides ample room or
recreation/playground area.
5. input ini~~to__ planning b the neighborhood has been urged by
start, butt Is always it cult to ascertain the degree of
input solicited by the petitioner or offered by neighbors
when staff is not directly involved.
RECOINWENDAT ION
This request complies with Development Guide policies of empha-
sizing residential land use in low intensity areas, While not
accer;sed by a collector street or larger, the private school
site does provide ample room for parking and recreational area,
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1675
by a vote of 5-2 with the following conditions:
(Case NZ-167$)
Paige Pour
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
1. The two acre private school site must have site plan approv-
al. Plat approval shall constitute site plan approval for
the single family section of the development.
2. A permanently maintained six (6) foot solid wood fence shall
be erected along the north boundary line adjacent to lot 17.
3. No detached signs shall be permitted,
4. The private school site shall be zoned SP-7 if the school is
not developed within three (3) years.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions
2. Approve petition without conditions
3. Approve petition with additional conditions
4. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1, Aerial
2. PD Concept Plan
3. Reply form totals
4. Property owner list
S. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July
11, 1984
~J
0351s
rT `
• f%
44
.
~ } rya
Y l;
R
I It
y}tt
~w y . -SFr
~t • a+1 ' e - ate'".
A I k f ` 0 .j fM
~ r
N y
• x iA >
~r • ! •
-:4 WWI
°►,~r' r
p. 1 14
y -.f w1
1~ V rt1 vn
i
ll U 11 i t
1 LOp ~
Il
~IA ~ 1' rl~ ~ • ~ ~ YD r~\
1 ,C'a1• ~ LF11' 1af_ ,r_. i / (-tj 1 'd ,
~4~4 ~ 1 ,
reb7'1;` "L1 TD 1 e
I , r
r
>f /I
W
aPd 070
-p1+. I L t Y+1. Il i. \I Lc:J1Ci.
.J.-• 111. 5 1 ri, I \.tloJll Lr
I" 11 I N! rl 1. 1 i.,
v. Ju ' 1 2-3 tee"
yy .:x r 13\ +
fj
r , V 7151 1im
I IJ 40 I
r t
1
17 I _`_1yf 1 19 ~ _1- ~ III ~ 1 J y \
I lo +r I
1 it U r I'I/ 17
V 's1 It1RI 1 k
V ' ; •~r ~ 9• B ` L r r:; reps
22
' 1 rV nrAi}e It ~~o l54
MQ1L \1 1 0 -j 1
1'r ,I.rI nM ~i<( oil (tly r rl A Zl
HIV l.4r ut'.k .1 " DNIL-. .
I 1'•.
VVrLCFTr
) UIR18 dx11C11l,Yh
I 1021 N Ctrl ~rr•• J
I{r ) JC11tON,T'V 1L201
I A[IiMINA4k pu K[tk?.f d-:Ct
1 ADbIT10N , I ,'x,~4'P;I
frLlf.n W l J :00C
At3A n1(Khan sv 4,30
i
<11`r 1110I011Y Or WOCIJ/,tY
r
BCAIf I 11wJ'
mol't
..•n a wn,
Co
7 rt .
cp. Ala IL1/
h rr /
A y4a,
i n
I ( , i
I I '
~I I
f
( a 1". lit
~ 'r f r
J
I
I
12
f f? ' r r ;t
' .J
~ v
'2 ! u ..di,,',~
J a m F `r'u m o r
-:144
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CI'T'Y COUNCIL
Z-1675
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received Mr. & Mrs. Sam LeGear
2108 Wisteria
Denton, Texas
James H. Perry
3209 Wisteria
Denton, Texas
M. & Mrs. J. D. Atkins
2223 Highland Park Road
Denton, Texas
Linda McKissack
2111 Wisteria
Denton, Texas
P & G Minutes
July 11, 1984
Page 1'2
Mr. Sidor'commented he thought it is an excellent
opportunity to get Teasley Lane improved and he stated
he plans to vote in favor of it.
Mr. Claiborne made a motion to deny Z-103. Seconded by
Mr. Escue and carried b-1. (Mr. Sidor voted no.)
C, G-105. This is the petition of Qhristopher Bancroft
requesting u change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development kPD) classifi-
cation on a 19,39 acre tract located on the south side
of Parvin Road approximately 1,50U feet east of Bonnie
Brae Road, If approved, the planned development will
permit 71 lots for single family detached use (minimum
lot size 7,000 square feet) and a two acre tract
reserved for a private school.
Mr. Ellison stated there were lU reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of subject property; I
was returned in favor, 3 in opposition, 1 In favor not
on the mailing list and 5 opposed not on the mailing
list,
Mr. Chris Bancroft, 1621 N. Elm, gave the location of
the proposed addition and stated his purpose was to find
a piece of property for a private school (Montesourri).
Mike Drurey stated he owns property to the northeast of
the proposed 23 acres and his main opposition was to the
increase of traffic. He stated he would be in favor of
the proposed if the City would block off the traffic
from Highland Park Road.
'Cony Franciona, 2104 Wisteria, stated Highland Park Road
is not a legitimate street, but runs directly into the
addition and with a private school, it will generate a
great deal of traffic.
Mark Atkins, 2'223 highland Park Road, stated his spirits
were greatly dampened as there has been a lot of in-
correct information given out regarding this property.
David Penn, 1908 Wisteria, gave the elevation of the
property and stated his opposition was to the lateral
Lines and sewerage station, He stated in his opinion
there is a need for a new pumping station.
Gerald Beasley, an area resident, stated he would not be
0 osed if the alley were blocked off or made a one way
alley, (Highland Park Road) as it could not be used as a
major street for the entrance i:o the addition.
P & 'Minutes '
July 11, 1984
Page 0
Emma Marie Atkins stated she owns 8 and one third acres
develop-
ment asetM and she has
her Wholes WaydOf life.
Mr. U1yai stated there seems to be some confusion in
regard to access to the addition, He stated off-site
improvements on Parvin would be made all the way to
Bonnie Brae Street which would be a major access to the
addition.
Mx. Clark stated he did not feel the trip generation
would be enough to binder the traffic in this area.
Mr. Ellison stated this site is located in a low
intensity area and feels that SF-7 type development
should not be denied on the basis of the traffic
problem, He stated according to the Denton Development
Guide, low intensity areas represent the primary housing
areas of the City and should emphasize residential use.
This proposal with 71 single family detached lots,
minimum size 7UUU square feet, obviously matches that
definition. He stated the property is located
immediately south of the Laurel Addition, an existing
SF-7 subdivision and the proposed use is a logical
continuation of the already existing use to the north.
He stated the second section of the planned development
is a 'l acre parcel at the southwest corner of the tract
to be reserved for a private school. He stated in low
intensity areas, staff applies Denton Uevelopment Guide
policies which encourage some land use diversity if
protection of the neighborhood and adjacent housing is
rovided, but discourages concentrations of multi-
amily, office, commercial and other higher density and
higher intensity uses. He stated there are five (5) key
criteria that diverse or non-low density land uses
apa low proval intensty Zi105 residential
should meet . Staff when
does proposed recommend in
area
conditions.
Mr. Ham stated there is no need for any additional sewer
facilities. He stated there is an existing lb" gravity
line that runs along the railroad track.
Mr. Bancroft stated he had no rebuttal,
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval G-1675
with the following conditions;
PJuyl*inoO4
Page 14
10 The two acre private school site must have site pplan
approval. Plat approval shall constitute site plan
approval for the single family section of the
development.
2, A permanently maintained six (b) foot solid wood
fence shall be erected along the north boundary line
adjacent to lot 170
3. No detached signs shall be permitted,
4, schooliistnotcdeveloped withinbthreee(3)P7eara,Che
Mr. Sidor made a motion to ammend the conditions and to
add that Parvin Road be improved all the way to Bonnie
Brae. Motion failed for lack of se;;ond.
Mr. Pearson stated he intended to vote against the
proposed for lack of adequate access.
Mr, Juren stated that lack of adequate access is not the
fault of the developer.
Mr. Sidor seconded the motion and carried 5-2, (Mr.
..Claiborne and Mr. Pearson voted no.)
D. G-10b. This is the petition of Douglas Wuenschel,
representing Good Samaritan Village, requesting
an amendment of a planned developpment (PU-'l l) at
25UU Hinkle Drive. The current 2 site plan permits
the development of an senior citizen retirement com-
plex, health center complex, adult day care center,
nine (9) duplexes and three (3) triplexes. The
petitioner desires to construct three (3) additional
duplexes on the site.
Mr. Ellison stated there were lU reply forms mailed to
property owners within 2UU feet of subject property; 1
was returned in opposition and zero in favor,
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Mr. Ellison stated the proposed addition of three one
story duplexes appears to be a reasonable land use
proposal in keeping with the approved site plan and low
intensity area policies. He stated the existing
utilities are adequate to serve the addition and the
entire planned development has access to Hinkle Drive,
a collector street and access to the proposed dupplexes
will be from the internal private street, Frank Hall
Drive. He stated staff recommends approval.
i
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.., Z-1676 Meeting Date: August 7, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Mr, Douglas Wuenschel
Good Samaritan Village
2500 Hinkle Dr.
Denton, TX 76201
Status of Applicant: Administrator, Good Samaritan Village
Requested Action: Amend currently existing PD site plan
to permit the construction of three
additional duplexes
Location and Size: A 28 afire tract located at the
southeast corner of Headlee Street
and Hinkle Drive
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Duplexes, single family resi-
dences; PD-21, SF-10
South - Rotirement center, vacant;
PD-21 and SF-10
East - Triplex, single family resi-
dences, vacant; PD-21, SF-10,
2-F
West - Triplex, vacant; PD-21, A
i
Dentoai Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity,
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: 't'here is an existing drainage channel
on the property located west of the
site of the proposed duplexes. The
three proposed additional structures
will not have a significant impact on
the current drainage situation.
(Case M Z-1676)
Page Two
i
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation; The entire PD has immediate access to
Hinkle Drive, a collector street with
60 feet of right-of-way. The propose
duplexes will be served by an internal
loop roadway system.
Utilities: There is an existing 161 utility
easement between two of the proposed
structures and another 16' utility
easement to the south of this area.
Adequate water, sewer, electrical,
gas and cable T.V, facilities are
available to the site,
ZONING HISTORY
A petition for a change in zoning classification from SF-10 to
W-2 was filed on behalf of Denton Good Samaritan Village by
Frank N. Hall in October of 1974. The purpose of the zoning
change was to establish a retirement village for senior
citizens. At the Planning and Zoning commission meeting of
November 13, 1974, this request was modified to a planned
development (PD) to insure that the property was developed as
presented; i.e., residential apartments and a health center.
The City Council approved the zoning change to planned
development (PD) at its regular meeting of December 3, 1974.
In May, 1979, the property owners wished to continue development
of the site by adding another wing of apartments (50 additional
units), and a row of duplexes along the south side of Headlee
Lane, The Planning and Community Development Department, in a
May 2, 1979 report to the Planning and zoning Commission, indi-
cated this was a reasonable land use proposal in keeping with
the approved site plan, and subsequently recommended that the
Planning and Zoning commission approve the site plan for
additions with two modifications. Based on the Planning
Department's recommendation, the Planning and Zoning commission
approved the addition to Good Samaritan Village at its May 2,
1979 meeting.
At the May 15, 1979 City Council meeting, the recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of the site plan
for an addition to Good Samaritan Village was approved. The
(Cass #Z-1676)
Page Three
I
ZONING HISTORY (Continued)
I
addition included duplexes on the south side of Hsadlse Lane; a
triplex on the south side of W. Hall Drive near Hinkle, a tri-
plex on the south side of East Hall Drive near the east property
line; and a 50 unit four-story apartment addition located adja-
cent and south of the existing building.
I
I
ANALYSIS
The proposed addition of three one story duplexes appears to be
a reasonable land use proposal in keeping with the approved site
plan and low intensity area policies. Existing utilities are
adequate to serve the addition. The entire planned development
has access to Hinkle Drive, a collector street, and access to
the proposed duplexes will be from the internal private street,
Frank Hall Drive.
RECOMMENDATION
Inasmuch as the proposed addition complements land use in the
existing PD and complies with low intensity area policies, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1676 by
a vote of 7-0.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition
2. Approve petition with conditions
3. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. Proposed Amended Concept Plan
3. Reply form totals
4. Property owner list
5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July
11, 1984
0657a
Nqlll4,p Are
V, V
lot,
•
t • t t
I AL..
t ■TW(' 1
h~
~ r.
s
i
1 * ~
~d` \ to
Alt
Jim&
1
14
clsop SAIAWf'Ald vl. ,;.u.. LOr , BLOCK r
/ r,1 [~:Ar PNE ~If.RY ON( 9fplY
' 4~ qp CVYI Ee tlVOLC1
I ~ i r
1 ~r !
I ~
3
~ S , ~ ~a:-r~z-ixroRrtw. '419!'(.'.Q9LL~SC7S.TYLIt-••~~
1~
C2
~ % `114'
i
41 -
L lll' LLI r~ CAE lit Cl ~L. ,-f
PROPERTY W COiiREPLY FORMS
CITY L
Z-1676
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Harry Down None Received
U,S, Bank
Dentont Texas
J
Puty21*inV984
Page 14
it 'rho two acre private school site must have site plan
approval. Plat approval shall constitute site plan
approval for the single family section of the
development.
2. A permanently maintained six (b) foot solid wood
fence shall be erected along the north boundary line
adjacent to lot 17,
3. No detached signs shall be permitted,
40 The private school site shall be zoned SF-7 if the
school is not developed within three (3) years.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to ammend the conditions and to
add that Parvin Road be improved all the way to Bonnie
Brae, Motion failed for lack of second.
Mr. Pearson stated he intended to vote against the
proposed for lack of adequate access.
Mr. Juren stated that lack of adequate access is not the
fault of the developer.
Mr. Sidor seconded the motion and carried 5-2. (Mr,
Claiborne and mr, Pearson voted no.)
D G lb7b. This is the petition of Douglas Wuenschel,
representing Good Samaritan Village, requesting
an amendment of a planned development (PD-Zl) at
L5UU Hinkle Drive. The current PD site plan permits
the development of an senior citizen retirement com-
plex, health center complex, adult day care center,
nine (9) duplexes and three (3) triplexes, The
petitioner desires to construct three (J) additional
duplexes on the site.
Mr, Ellison stated there were lU reply forms mailed to
property owners within 2UU feet of subject property; 1
was returned in opposition and zero in favor.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request,
Mr. Ellison stated the proposed addition of three one
story duplexes appears to be a reasonable land use
proposal in keeping with the approved site plan and low
intensity area policies. He stated the existing
utilities are adequate to serve the addition and the
entire planned development has access to Hinkle Drive,
a collector street and access to the proposed dupplexes
will be from the internal private street, Frank Eiall
Drive. He stated staff recommends approval.
Z 1, M4
July 11, Page 15
Chair declared public hearing closed,
Mr, Escue made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-167b. Seconded by Ms, Cole and unanimously carried
L(7 U).
E, S-180. This is the petition of W, D. B rne, repre-
senting the Y.M,C.A, of Metropolitan Dallas, requesting
a specific use permit on an 8,59 acre tract located at
the northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Riney Road.
if approved, the specific use permit would allow the
development of a Y.M.C.A. facility.
Mr, Ellison stated there were lU reply forms mailed to
property owners within 2UU feet of the subject property;
1 was returned in opposition and zero in favor,
Mr. W.U. Byrne stated he was representing the Y.M.C.A.
and would ask that the commission approve the proposal.
Bill Highland, stated he is the director of the Y.M.G.A.
in Denton and has been for three years. He stated the
current membership is close to 2,000 children and a
facility of this nature would be very favorable.
Ralph Morrison, 71b Southridge, stated this will add
prestige and a place for the neighborhood children,
John Wier, a new area resident, stated he has just
signed a contract on his home and is concerned about
the proposed parking lot.
itilr Dane, an area resident, stated he thought the
proposed was a very good idea. He stated his question
was in regard to Riney Road,
Mr. Ellison stated perimeter street paving would apply.
Mr. Ellison also stated low intensity area policies
encourage some land use diversity if protection of the
neighborhood and adjacent housing is provided, but
discourages concentrations of multi-family, office,
commercial and other higher density/intensity uses. He
stated there are five (5) criterian that diverse land
uses should meet when proposed. in a low intensity
residential area. He stated the site is accessed by a
collector street or larger; the 8,5 acre site does
provide ample room for parking and access. The overall
intensity/density standard is not violated and the tract
is adjacent to North Lakes Park, a very compatible land
use. He stated staff recommends approval of S-180 with
conditions.
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FOR
AN AMENDED SITE PLAN THEREFOR, PURSUANT THEECTTY PROVIStQNS Of
G OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
APPENDIX B-CUMIN
TEXAS AS SAID SITE PLAN APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 27.437 ACRES OF
LAND, MORE OR LESS' OUT OF THE ROBERT BEAUMONT SURVEY' ABSTRACT NO,
311 AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS' HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION I.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation of the
following described property' to-wits
All that certain lot' tract, or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas, and
being a part of a 37.98 acre tract conveyed by Trustee's Deed dated
February 5, 1929' from R. M. Barnes, Trustee, to Joe 5, Gambill, as
shown of record in Volume 222, Page 468 of the Deed Records of
Denton County, Texas, and being out of the Robert Beaumont Survey,
Abstract No. 31, and being more particularly described as foliowsi
ana east boundary line e an of
and ldirectly between the north the
east Hinkle Drive at a steel pin in street designated as Headlee Lana, said point of beginning also
being south 00415' east $12 feet from the original northwest corner
of the Gambill 37.98 acre tracts
THENCE north 89430' east along the centerline of Headlee Lane 901.5
feet to a steel pin in the east boundary line of said 17.98 acre
east curbs
tracto and oenterline
point being south between 00the *17'31`north
from the original northeast corner of the Gambill 37.98 acre tract)
THENCE south 00417131' east along the east boundary line of the
37.98 acre tract passing at 17 foot the south curb in Headlee Lane,
distance continuing of on said t course a and along existing
the uOutheast corner of
the Gambill 37.98 acre traetl
THENCE north 894511544 west along the south boundary line of the
southwest cornerf oeft thto a fence
Gambill for the old
e Gambill
37.98 acre tract and being 21 feet east of the centerline of Hinkle
Drive, whose present width is 42 feet)
THENCE boundaryolineOoflSHinkleeDrivetpaalong ssingaate23031feetncthenSouth curb
in Headlee Lane, and continuing on said course a total at:stance of
2320 feet to the point of beginnings
having been previously designated as a Planned adl apment Di trict
under the provisions of ordinance No. 81-25' paas
the 17th day of March, 1981) in accordance with the provisions of
Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to provide for a revised compre-
hensive site plan of the development.
Z-1676/GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE/PAGE 1
SECTION 11,
The conditions and restrictions applicable to the Property
described herein and Imposed therein by Ordinance No, 81-2$, which
are as folluwsi
1, Planned DevelopmenT 'PD-21" for use S~j an elderly retirement com-
plex) Day Care entertea, Triplexes, a Health Center
2, perty r line owner extending provide the fusix (61) ll width f of t E, Screen along Hall Drive eastern pro-
are expressly retained and nut amended hereby,
SEC,TIUN III,
That the comprehensive site plan for the Planned Development
District approved and adopted by Ordinance No, 81-251 applicable to
the herein described property, Is hereby amended In accordance with
the comprehensive t'te plan attached hereto and the use of said pro-
perty shall be here.-fter in accordance with such amended site plan,
SECTION IV,
That the city council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds
that such change is in accordance with it comprehensive plan for the
purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton,
Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for
the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or
particular with a View to
s,, conserving the g lutheof most
protecting
buildings,
appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of
Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordLnanee shall be in full force and effect immedi-
ately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings
Dentono toning giving Commission due
Council eof the the Planning and
and ithe heretofore
notice thereof,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of August, 1985,
RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM,
JOE D, MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
-
2-1676/000D SAMARITAN VILLAGE/PAGE 2
0,600 SAMAAITAa LIT r BLOC,( r
l':A~ ONI lt611r ON/ eTplr \ . , , k
I - ~
i
I
i
J
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: August 7, 1984
SUBJECT: Adoption of, an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 81,44 acres of land
located on the south side of Paige Road and
along the west side of Swisher Road and north
of the MKT Railroad (A-1).
SUMMARY; Adoption of the accompanying ordinance and
service plan will accomplish annexation of
the 81.44 acres shown on the attached map.
ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of the ordinance and service plan.
(REQUIRES SIX (b) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES,)
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adoption of the ordinance and service plan
2. Disapprove the ordinance and service plan
3. 'Cable the ordinance acid service plan
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance
2, Service Plan
3. Map
arron arm n
Planning Intern
No,
AN ORDINANCE ANt?FXING A TRACT OF LAND C^VTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO
THE CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL
OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 81.44 ACRES OF LAND LYING
AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PENTON STATE OF TEXAS AND
BEING PART OF THE G. WALKER SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 13110 DENTON
COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYINO THE SAME AS AORICULTMAL 'A' bISTRICT
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the
petition of the City of Denton, Texas$ and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing held
for that purpose on the ~7ArA day of , 1984 in the
Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their views
and present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, sat a public hearing hold
fox that purpose on the 54bll day of T, „e, , 1984 in the
Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their views ,
ant' present evidence bearing upon the annexation provided by this
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at least
one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Taxes,
prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, K_RE.
ORDAINS
SECTION 1.
That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the same
is hereby annexed to the City of 9enton, Texas, and the same is
made hereby a part of said City and the land and the present and
future inhabitants thereof shall be entitled to all the rights and
privileges of other citizers of said City and snap be bound by :;)e
acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which may nerz•
after be enacted and the property situated therein shall be subject
to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied by the City.
SHILON-PAGE KOAD/PAGE ONE I
~~V
The tract of land hereby annexed is described as follows, to-wit;
All that Certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the County of Denton, State of Texas, being part of the C.
Walker Survey, Abstract No. 1330 and being more particularly
described as follows]
BECII4141410 ac a point in the present city limits as established by
ordinance oo 74-44, said point lying in the east boundary line of
a tract conveyed to Launa Ann Caudle Huffines by deed recorded in
Volume 822, Page 167 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas
said point also lying in a north and south road known as Swisher
Road;
THENCE north 86°15' west along the said present city limits,
passing at 1169.84 feat the west boundary line of said Huffines
tract, same being the east boundary line of a tract conveyed to
Oak-Scott Five, Ltd. by deed recorded in Volume 1112, Page 448 of
the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and continuing for a
total distance of 1826.17 fast to a point for a corner, said point
lying in the southerly boundary line of said tract, same being the
northerly right-of-way line of the M.K.T. Railroad, said point
also 1 ins in a curve to the left with a radius of 1544.69 t'eet,
central angle of 1°55'28" and a chord of north 71'44'34" west
51.88 feet;
THENCE northwesterly along said curve to the left an arc distance
of 51.88 feet to a point;
THENCE north 72°42'18" west a distance of 215.16 feet to a point
for a corner same beng the southwest corner of said Oak-Scott
Five, Ltd. tract;
THENCE north 3°56'48" west along the west boundary line of said
tract a distance of 1593.86 feet to a point for a corner same
being the northwest corner of said tract, said point lying in an
east and west road known as Page Road;
THENCE south 85°38'47" east along the north boundary line of said
tract and in said road a distance of 1079.41 feet to a point for a
corner, same being the northeast corner of said Oak-Scott Five,
Ltd, tract and the northwest corner of said Huffines tract;
THENCE south 87°52' east along the north boundary line of said
Huffines tract and in said road a distance of 1172.2 feat to a
point for a corner same being the northeast corner of said
Huffines tract; .
THENCE south 2°06' west along the east boundary line of said
Huffines tract and in said Swisher Road a distance of 1665.28 feet
to the place of beginning and containing 81.44 acres of land, more
or less.
SECTION 11.
:ne above described property is hereby classified as Agricui-
t,:al "A" District and shall so appear on the official zoning map
of the City of Denton, Texas, wuich map is nereby amended
accordingly.
$1111,0}1-PAGE :LOAD/PAGE: 7V:O
SECTION III,
This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its pateagr,
introduced before the City Council on the -.26 ! day of Xvn e_ ,
1984.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council on the day
of , 1984.
KAYUK
RICHA"
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE-ALLE-N CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,)TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEOAL FORK;
C. J. TAYLOR JR., CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTbN, TEXAS
BY;
Silli.011-PAGE KOAu/PACE THREE
PLAN OF SZRVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 870a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 870a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service,
I, Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
S. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting farce, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
uhuckholos, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in tha annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H, Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
T, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed a re,zs in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J, Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L, Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
No Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
I
f~~f X11
f ~
. r
r
h
r
IayiV I,I
r ~
r
e
1 r
II
I ~ N1
Soso
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
I
MEETING DATE; August 7, 1984
SUBJECf1 Adoption of an ordinance and service plan
annexing approximately 470 acres of land
beginning 350 feet south of and perpendicular
to the centerline of U, S. Highway 380 (A-3),
SUMMARY: Adoption of the accompanying ordinance and
service plan will accomplish annexation of
the 470 acres shown on the attached map,
ACTION REQUIRED; Adoption of the ordinance and service plan.
(REQUIRES SIX (6) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES.)
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES; 1. Adoption of the ordinance and service plan
2. Disapprove the ordinance and service plan
3. 'fable the ordinance and service plan
ATTACHMENTS; 1. Ordinance
2, Service Plan
3. Map
arron Jarm n
Planning Intern
N0.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT GOT, TRACT OF PARCEL OF
LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMAT"_GY 470 ACRES OF :.AND LYING AND BEING
SITUATED It, THE COUNTY OF DSNTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF
THE M. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 411, DCiTCN COUNTY, TEXAS:
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICUL"U.nAL CIST.' RICT PROPERTY; N:
DECLAR:t;G AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, one requast fc: annexation :as Introduced a: a
:ec:'ifr •-,eet:nc of the city Ccunci: of one city cf Benton, texas.
on one petition of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a pudic neari,ne ne:_
for tnat purpose On the CA, Cf '11 c" `1984 :r. .ne
C:uncii Cnamners for all interested pe:sons state tteir ._ew.
and present evidence bM inc ,.pon one annexation provieed o;' ..._s
ordinance; and
'W'HEREAS, an opportunity .as a::crcec, at a ;colic r,earir.;
for .rat purpose on the r*fn ca;, cf n _9b: e
CO'unc 11 Cnanoers f c : ail interested persons to State .ne i. is~
sac esent eyicence oearin: upon one annexa:_. n provided cy
Crd,nan:e; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance nas Geen putiitned .n fl.:i at _eaat
one time in the official new paper of .he city Denton, :ex.s
prior to Its effective date, anc After one pudic :neatincs;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CGUKC:_ THE CITY OF :'MCN, MA
HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTI^N I
Tnat one hereinafter des:: iced .:ac: of :anc ne, anc one :..-e
is nerecy annexed 00 one Ci , of Denton, :exis, anc toe .:.-r is
aaoe nere:y a part of said C::, Inc .:,e :and anc one ,:esen:
:,.,ire innaoitant_= .:epee: sna:: r,e _.,..t:ec all ;to :13n._
.ri..IaGes Ct none: c:._.:e.",z ca:.. c; , anc son-_ .e
..:e acts ano L1_;, races . « l:.=CI or w.... r
11 in: sea: pa.. _ LAE ......b- 2 .c_
J°w. e.
All that certain, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated
in the county of Denton, State of Taxas, being part of the
Forrest Survey, Abstract No, 417 and more porticu:arly described as
follovs;
BEGIMOING at a point in the present city linics as established by
Ordinance No, 69-40 Tract V, said point lying 350 feet a;outh of and
perpendicular to the centerline of L'. S. Highway 380 and in the
east boundary line of Lot 6, Block A of the Subdivision ei said
survey;
,,irl CE south along the east bourdary Tina of said Lot 6, pass:,-,g
its southeast corner, same being the northeast corner of Lct l.,
an.4 passing the southeast corner of Lot l2, and passing the ncrtr-
east corner of Lot 51 Block B and continuing to the southeast
corner of said Lot 5 to a point for a corner;
'HENCE south 84°49'20" east passing the nortneast corner of Lot
310ck B, passing the nor thvest corner of Lot 5, Block E, an
continuing for a total distance of 1778,08 feet to a point for a
corner;
THENCE south 35°33'40" east a distance of 319.94 feet to a point
for a corner;
"ENCE south 69023'20" east a distance of 422,45 feet to a pc i., r.
for a corner;
...%ENCE soutn 6x°45'10" east a distance cf 323.50 feet to a ic'_Gc
for a corner;
CE south 5°55'10" east a distance of 501 ,tO feet to a ^iat
a ccrner in the east boundary. line cf Lot 5, Block E;
,
}1Ei;CE south 4°58' west along the east boundar'.' line o-.' t
Bloc Y. E a distance of 1313.62 feet to a pcint for a corner;
-YNCE nort", 84°49'20" west along the south boundary line c:
Block E to a point 500 feet east of the southwest corner of Lot
Block E;
`HENCE south 3°07' vest 500 feet east of and parallel to t:,e west
Boundary line of said Lot 2, Block F, a distance of 1432,4" feet to
a point for a :.orner in the north bounda r: line of a tract cenve•,ed
to McDonnell inter;) rases by deed reccrdec in Volune 1195, ?ag:e t,
of the Deed Records of Dencon County, Texas;
,M CE south 31`06'42" east a di8tancc :f 369,55 feet to a pci t
for a corner;
=r ;CE south 40°36'52" east a distancr cf 551.38 feet a -s tint
for a corner;
r.;CZ south east a distance ct :Pet to a :C....
for a corner;
_N C. SC: t., 25`22' 26" .'est c CLstance :i I'I.5F feet , C1...
.,,7 a ccrner ,
nCr_r~ east a __S tF Ce Jc G._ teEt tC c
r a ccrner;
L;~Ci SCL _~.:1'GC•" :ESt o ..._.cdCE :eBt n
a corner;
.KTNC .cut:o 2037 ' west a c'_::ance °.6G feet to a
ccrner;
THENCE south 39')7' west a distance of :35,26 feet to a point for
a cornea
.HENCE south 2°04'27' west a distance of 595,66 feet to a point for
a IQ rner;
;HENCE 83032'49' west a distance of 1023.4) feet to a point for a
cornea
mcE nortn 64°50'47 west a distance of .0'1,15 feet to a point
for a corners
THE:+:E north :°1)east aiony :he west :oundary .ine Of LCt
sane oelnc the east bouricary ♦ine of Lct 6, @locK F of said
subs:vis ton, a distance of ?45 , 64 feet to a point fW a corner;
'HENCE norm l°46'25' east along said lot lines a distance of
2127,77 feet to a point to; a corner sane oeinc tae north':est
corner of said Lot 7 ano the scctneast corner of Lot l;
::HENCE north 66°:6'40' 'rest a:Cn; :he soutn tdundary __he of -'c o
passing at :.)93,23 feet toe southwest corner of Lot 1, sane oe:ng
the wetter!; southwest corner of Sald Mic DCnhe.l tract and the east
bounoary line of a north and south cb'un:j road, known as Criss C;n
Road, ano continuing for a total distance of 140.3 feet to a ;pint
for a corner in vrissoa Roao;
?:ENCE north 2°26'35' east in said Cr%sso: Y.o ac a .:stancef
.-,5,40 feet to a point for a ccrner;
MACE scut, E6004,21, east pass:ny at feet the east oo nca
_ine of said Kiss= Roac, sane oe:nc .no vest oounda: line ^f
sazc McDonnell tract, ano ccnt:nulnc or a total distance of .6.,YS
zee, to a .nt for a corner;
7EENCE south 66'1'0"' east a ...stance 7394_ feet :c a ;Ci nt
fe. a corner in the eac '-'..uary l.ne of Lot ,
'HENCE north 4135120' east a ..:stance Of `_67.4 feet to a porn: fcr
a corner;
THENCE north 3°07' east a distance of :.._,5: feet to a point for a
corner, same oetn; toe nortn'rest corner A Lot 2, 31ocr. sa^e
being t'rre northeast corner of Lot 1, Block
`HENCE norm 64`49'20' rest passing the southwest cornet of _ t
B1ocK B, same oein@ the southeast corne: Of Lot 1 , hLOC K C and
continuing to a point for a corner, said Point being tnt cost
southerly southwest corner of a :act Conveyed tc Mar'j LOelse t.:d,
et ai by deed recorded in voiu,ae 10:6, Pace 743 Of the :,eec Scccrds
of Benton County, Texas;
HENCE nett,. a°51'40' east a Clstance of f46.__ feet tt a
a corners
...SCE ncrtn 63, 1J' rest tistance 6F2 feet i point
fcr corner;
. ENCE ncrtn 4 a t 9 ' 4 1 ' bas: bass:'. at 1M,:F feet WE nC: tst
c _ and Ca n. t.,. ,..nd ..r .sta.. :v s:.n.Ct tee. .t
.nt a :writer za _ zlinC ..:t . t
w
TEEIiCE moron S04 feet nor tn t nounaacy of to',( east Coundar line of Lot
Slocy, ame A, Passing tn Lot 6, aLocx A and continuing
G
point lying ,o the present city
tsao me a be pioingnt th feor sou a th cornet oary said line
,
knits, said puint also beinq 350 faet Scutt. of and perPenaicular
to the centerline of U. 5, gi(n';ay 3601
THENCE nortneasterly alone the present c:t/ limits 350 feet souts
of ano parallel to the centerline of U, S. gignway to a place c.
oecinninq ana containing 470 acres of land, more or less.
E6 CT 11 C 11, LI I
The above descricec Yrcperty is heresy classified as n5::c4
tural 'Ar District ane Stall so appear on t;e official zoning map
of the City of Dentcr„ Texas, .h:cn map is nerecy ar.en1:ec
accordirngly.
This `ordinance stall ce effective immediately upon its passage.
on the G tlday of J~..
:nt:ocuted cefora C'. CourC.1 o k.--
.
V PASSED M"D APPROV.. ry :.E _.tf Cc'.nCOr, the u~ :a}
19£4.
R:CY.Ar,U 0, TE~'1.?T, :'...Yu
ERAS
CITY OF DEN TON, .
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLE`, C:TY ECETARY
C:TY O DE:4701f, TEXA5
APPROVED AS ;'0 LEGAL -C'Ru:
C. J. TA: )R, JR., C,-. AT:OR1iE':
C:TY OF DErT01i, TEXAS
N
PLAN OF SERVICE FO ANNT<+ ED AREA CI Y OF DENTO m X .
IMEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
1, Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective dente of annexation, anu
thereafter from new 11nes as extended in accordance
with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D, Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, 'texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will he extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
$ervioe Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
ohuokholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, eta.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
ae the need Liierefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
r
Service Plan
Annexed Areae
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street nararoximatelye8emonthsdafwill be ter the installed
within app
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the They Plcon ansistprioritized byasuchapolicy guide-
dated yearly.
lines as;
(1) Demand for services as compared to other area
based partly on density of population, magnitude
ude
estshed
of problems compared to other areas,
standards a i
technical
naturalortechnicalrestraintsoraopportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
from
The annexed area which will i be r no longerpthannonegyeart
the upcoming CI year the
' the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning
same
annexation area will be judged accordingly
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
1 . ..........r
Jr Ii
f
1
\ i I
I+
i. I.
Y \
, ~L( \\111 \
1 _1 1 I
l I A-3
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 11 1984
To: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
Fromi Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner
Subject: Name change for Ridgeway Drive
Councilman Ray Stephens has requested that we process a request
to change the name of Ridgeway Drive to Lillian Miller Parkway.
The request has been reviewed and approved by the Historic
Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
As Ridgeway Drive has not yet been accepted by the City, it
technically does not have a name. This street will be named
Lillian Miller Parkway when it is accepted by the City.
4s.rvJ k.
Denise S ivdy
DS:ab
Attachments
1
i~j
#Itto$ N.
fr
w
y } slo¢mNw ` ►114►0lED STllttt NAME CHANGE
L~ j4 ..1 1
LIZ
r __.,1 ~gl~pra r„
NO~UW_NIll7_~ V~'
' ~ 1 V
5 } I+,
I 1
I IOIi110M +0.
i
1 i
r`
HLC Minutes
July 19, 1984
1. Consider changing the name of Ridgeway Drive to Lillian Miller
Parkway,
Councilman Ray Stephens appeared before the Commission to
request that the name of Ridgeway Drive be changed to Lillian
Miller Parkway. Councilman Stephens reported that Ridgeway
drive is quite close to Ridgecrest Street and the similar
names have already resulted in confusion to the public.
Councilman Stephens presented background information on
Lillian Miller: Mrs. Miller was the first woman elected to
the Denton City Council, was a charter member of the Denton
County Health Board when it was formed in 1969, was a member
of the N.T.S.U. Faculty Wives Club, was a member of the
Business and Professional Women's Club, was President of the
Denton Association of Christian Women, was Instructor and
Administrator of Catechism at Immaculate Conception Catholic
Church - for her many years of service in this role she was
awarded the Bishop's Medal of Honor, the highest award of the
diocese, was delegate to the National Democratic Convention of
1972, was precinct chairman and election judge, was chairman
of the Voter Rights Committee of the League of Women Voters.
She was elected to the City Council in April of 1973 and
served until her death in June of 1974.
Dr. Stephens stated that he had contacted the four individuals
who own property bordering on the present Miller Street and
all have no objection to renaming the existing Miller Street,
Ms. Spivey stated that she received a call from the Board of
Directors of the League of Women Voters expressing their
support for the proposed name change.
Mr. Boyd moved to recommend that the name, Ridgeway Drive, be
changed to Lillian Miller Parkway. Seconded by Mr. Miller and
unanimously carried (7-0).
P $ Z Minutes
July 25, 1954
Page 8
H. Consider changing the name of Ridgeway Drive to Lillian
Miller Parkway.
Councilman Ray Stephens appeared before the Commission
to request that the name of Ridgeway Drive be changed to
Lillian Miller Parkway. Councilman Stephens reported
that Ridgeway Drive is quite close to Ridgecrest Street
and the similar names nave already resulted in confusion
to the public, He presented background information on
Lillian Miller; Mrs. Miller was the first woman elected
to the Denton City Council, was a charter member of the
Denton County Health Board when it was formed In 1969,
was a member of the N.T,S,U. Faculty Wives Club, was a
member of the Business and Professional Women's Club,
was President of the Denton Association of Christian
Women, was Instructor and Administrator of Catechism at
Immaculate Conception Catholic Church - for her many
years of service in this role she was awarded the
Bisnop's Medal of Honor, the highest award of the
diocese, was delegate to the National Democratic
Convention of 1972, was precinct chairman and election
judge, was chairman of the Voter Rights Committee of the
League of Women Voters. She was elected to the City
Council in April of 1973 and served until her death in
June of 1974.
Ms. Jo Storer stated that she owns property along
Ridgeway Drive and supports the name change to Lillian
Miller Parkway.
Mr. Sidor asked if there was an existing Miller Street
and Mr. Stephens answered that he had contacted the four
individuals who own property bordering on the present
Miller Street and none object to renaming the existing
Miller Street.
Ms. Spivey stated that she received a call from the
Board of Directors of the League of Women Voters
expressing their support for the proposed name change,
Chairman LaPorte stated he thought it was a good idea
and commended Dr. Stephens for thinking of it,
Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval of the street.
name change from Ridgeway Drive to Lillian Miller
Parkway. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried
(6-0).
NO,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS PROVIDING FOR THE
RENAMING OF RIDGEWAY DRIVE, UPON IT$ APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE BY
THE CITY OF DEN"ON AS A PUBLIC STREET, SITUATED WITHIN THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, TO LILLIAN 4ILLER
PARKWAY AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Ridgeway Drive from the intersection of Interstate
35E Service Road and Loop 288, extending 4,650 feet south to
Teasley Lane (F.M. 2181V is an unopened street dedicated by plat
within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas) and
WHEREAS, the City Council, upon the opening, approval and
acceptance of Ridgeway Drive by the City of Denton, Texas wishes
to rename it to Lillian Miller Parkways and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas will accept the
responsibility of keeping and maintalning said street upon its
opening, approval and acoeptancel NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I,
That upon the opening, approval and acceptance of that
certain street dedicated and designated, by plat, as Ridgeway
Drive, and which intersects the Interstate 35E service road and
extends south 40650 feet to Teasley Lane (F.M. 2181, said
street, upon becoming a public street, shall be and hereafter be
known as Lillian Miller Parkway, and it is hereby named and so
designated,
SECTION Ii.
The Planning and zoning Commission of the City of Denton,
Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to let that puollc
street herein named Lillian Miller Parkway be so designated on
the Official Map of the City of Denton, Texas,
SECTION Ill.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its
date of passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1984.
RICHARD 0. STEW ART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXt.S
7
I
L7))
ciryof osier N, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING OENTON, TEXAS 76201 i TELEPHONE (817) 5668200
Office of the City Manager
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
DATE: August 2, 1984
SUBJECT: MICROFILMING OF CITY RECORDS
Due to the limited size of the City vault and to the rapidly-
deteriorating condition of many of our older )fficial City
records, I am recommending these important records be
microfilmed. The vault presently contains over 280,000 pages
of documentation and approximately 20,000 more documents are
being added t A I s year, These are "official" City records
. (minutes, ordinances, resolutions, contracts, and the like),
Removal of these records from the vault to another location,
such as the City warehouse, would create an increased security
risk and would provide inconvenience to the City Secretary in
obtaining records. Use of microfilm will allow us to store
more documents in the vault, speed retrieval time, and prevent
the loss of vital information due to the aging and
deterioration of paper copies,
A microfilm ordinance is required by state law before official
records can be microfilmed and the originals destroyed,
Approval of the attached ordinance will satisfy this state
requirement. At a future City Council meeting my staff will
present for your approval a contract with a service bureau to j
perform the microfilming.
I will be glad to answer any questions which you may have about
this
J
etty ean, s star anager
ca
1445C
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR MICRO-
FILMING OF OFFICIAL CITY RECORDS) SPECIFYING THE TYPES OF RECORDS
REQUIRING AMERICA
STANDARDS INSTITUTEI REQUIRING THE CITY SECRETARY TO CERTIFY THAT
EACH MICROFILM RECORD IS A TRUE AND CORRECT DUPLICATION OF THE
ENTITLED CBYS LAWOj
ORIC.NAL INFORMATION PUBLIC ON THE RECORDI WHICIHOTHTHE EY PUBLIC FREE
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the original copies of ordinances, resolutions, and
other records maintained by the City Secretary are aging ann
deteriorating) and
WHEREF;+, the size of the City vault limits the amount of hard-
copy ecords that can be maintained] NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS]
SECTION I,
1. Authorization to Microfilm Public Records, That the City
Secretary or other designated officer or employee is authorized to
microphotograph or microfilm the following specific public records
of the City kept on file with the City Secretaryt ordinances,
resolutions, proclamations, minutes Of the city council meetings)
minutes of the meetings of all boards and commissions of the City,
indexes to minutes, contracts, bids, bonds, deeds, real property
records and oaths of office,
2, Index, That all microfilm records made pursuant to this
ordinance shall have an accompanying index for such ,ocords,
1. Quality Standards. All microfilm records made pursuant to
this ordinance shall meet the requirements of the United States of
America Standards institute for archivist quality, density, reso-
lution, and definition except for microfilm records intended only
for short term use, as determined by the City Council,
4, Certified, The City Secretary, Deputy City Secretary or
other designated officer or employee shall check and certify that
each microfilm record made pursuant to this ordinance is a true
and correct duplication of the original public record.
PAGE 1
i
ubl►p, That the public shall have free access
5. Accea_
to information in microphotographs or microfilms made pursuant to
this ordinance, which they are entitled to under law.
6, Destruction of original. Records Notice Transfer to State
L(brar
(a) That original public records microfilmed in compliance
with this ordinance may be destroyed as directed by the City
council with the advice and consent of the City Attorney, unless
otherwise required by federal or state law,
(b) That original public records, the subject matter of
which (s in litigation, may not be destroyed until such litigation
is final.
(c) That original public records which are not microfilmed
in compliance with this ordinance or which are determined to be
worthless by the City Council may be destroyed as directed by the
1
City council.
(d) That notice of proposed destruction or disposition of
original public records shall first be given to tite state Librarian
or State ArehiViSt, and if such records are, in his opinion, needed
for the State Library, the records shall be transferred thereto.
SECTION II'
That this ordinance shall becomu effective immediately upon
its passage and approval. 1984.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of -
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTS
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
13Y; m ,
PAGE 2
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TOt The Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROMt bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works
D&TEt August 2, 1984
SUBJECTt MANDATORY ANIMAL REOISTRATION
I have attached for your consideration copies of a proposed ordinance
amending Chapter Four of the Code of ordinance by establishing ordinance
tory animal registration program for the City of Denton, he b dogsbandhcats keptswithindthencorporateelimittsaofathepCl.tying only to
g
In essence, this program will require the owners of dogs and cats to
register their animals with the City thrthehbits Animal Control Division
on an annual basis. As y may recall, asic fee se tained in the ordinance establishes an annual fee of $5.00 per animal
for animals that have not been spayed or neutered and a fee of. $3.00 per
Themordinanceoalsovestabl.ishesradpenaltyeforythosepownersfwhoofailttov,
register their animals.
Should the Council approve this ordinance, we would recommend that a
grace period of sixty days be established before the ordinanc isthe
actually enforced. This grace period will allow us to publiize
program and begin the initial registration effort. The Denton Humane
Society has volunteered to assist us in a mass 'registration ffort to he cipate conducted prior to the enforcement of this ordinance. hae<ll t by
mail in
that the required registration renewal process future years.
Although we have discussed these issues on previous occasions, wefeelA
is i as p follows: of this program.
it is brief summary important of t these restate benefits anticipated
Establish number and location of animals within the
City. Will allow for the direct notification of animal owners
in an area should a rabies epidemic occur.
Insure compliance with existing rabies vaccination laws and
regulations.
MEMO TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
August 2, 1984
Page 2
Lesson the holding time of animals at the Animal Control
Center, thus reducing crowded conditions and possible exposure
to transmittable diseases,
lessen the holding time of animals at the Center, thus
reducing holding costs and time spent on Center maintenance
activities.
Esteb1Ish number and location of animals within the City so
that services and budgets can be planned appropriately,
Increase revenues for the Animal Control Division to provide
funding for additional personnel to meet increasing demands
for service,
Place some of the burden for funding on animal owners without
further penPlizing the general taxpayer who may or may not ovr
pets.
In addition, we see this prograv. as a real benefit to the responsible
animal owner. Even the most responsible of owners have their pets get
loose on occasion, and many of these Animals are impounded And held at
the Center. If these animals were registered, Animal. Control could
notify the owners of such animals immediately upon impoundment, Thus,
the pet owner would be spared the worry and time spent in search of
their pets. For many owners, this service would be well worth the
annual fee they would be required to pay.
During the last few months we have discussed this program with both the
Humane Society and some of the local veterinarians. The Humane Society
has expressed their support for the program and have offered to promote
and participate in the registration effort. Although n few of the local
veterinarians have openly opposed the program, others have indicated
that they would not participate in the program, but would promote the
program through their practices,
Should the Council choose not to adopt the ordinance, it will be neces-
sary to take a hard look at the service level of this division as the
revenues generated by registration were dedicated to the cost of the
division's operations. Specifically, these revenues were earmarked to
fund additional personnel for this division which has not experienced .a
staffing level increase in eight years, With the increasing demand for
service due to the growth of the City, it will be impossible to meet the
demand for services, thus, some service reduction wil.' have to be made,
MEMO TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL,
August 21 1984
Page 3
Should you have any comments or questions on this item, please let us
know.
Sill Angelo
AA/sc
anm
Attachments; Proposed Ordinance
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4. ("ANIMALS") OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY Or DENTON TEXAS by ADDING A NEW SECTION
PROVIDING FOR THE REGISTRATION bF DOGS AND CATS; ESTAhLISHING
FEES THEREFOR' REQUIRING IDENTIFICATION TAG$ TO BE WORN BY DOGS
AND CATS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUMORED
($200,00) DOLLARS FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A
SEVER.OILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSi
SECTION I.
That Chapter 4 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas is,hereby amended by adding a new Section 4-23 to
read as follows;
"Section 4-23. Registration & Identification of Dogs & Cats
1. Registration Required; Every owner of a dog or cat kept
in the City wnicn over four (4) months of age shall,
within thirty (30) days of the time the person becomes the
owner of said animal, and each year thereafter, register
said animal with the animal control officer of the City.
An owner within the City temporarily shall not be required
to register a dog or cat which is not kept within the
city for a perl,od of more than sixty (60) days.
2. Procedure and Fees; The owner of a dog or cat required
to be reg s ere erein shall register such animal each
ear on forms provided by the animal control officer.
ach animal to be registered must have a current rabies
vaccination certificate. The registration fee for each
animal shall be five dollars ($5.00) per year. Owners
who submit written proof, satisfactory to the animal
control officer, that the animal to be registered is
incapable of ocreation shalt. be charged a fee of three
dollars ($3,08), per year.
3. Registration Certificates; Identification Tags
a) Upon proper registration of the animal and payment of
the proper fpe the owner shall be issued a registra-
tion certificate and animal identification tag which
shall be valid for one year. The tag shall contain
the name and addrese of the owner of the animal, the
effective date a description of the animal and such
other information as the animal control officer deems
necesaary,
b) The tag shall be affixed to the collar or harness of
the animal registered and the owner shall cause said
collar or harness with affixed tag to be worn at all
times by said animal.
c) It shall be unlawful for any person to alter or
obliterate any information contained on a current
identification tag.
d) If such tag is lost or destroyed the owner shall
obtain a duplicate upon payment of a one dollar
($1,00) fee.
.
SECTION II.
That any person violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall, upon oonviction, bw fined a sum not excee-ting
Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) 1 and each day and every day 'that
the provisious of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a
separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in additi(:- to
and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be available aC law
and equity,
SECTION III..
That if apy section, subsaction, paragraph, senn+nce,
clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, application thitreof
to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any cot-t of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect tile
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, anii the
City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declaz,xa it
would have enacted such remaining portions despite an,i such
invalidity.
SECTION VI.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14)
days from the date of its passage, and the City Secrec4e.ry is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be
published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the oLficial
newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (iO) (:,,Lys of
the date of its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED th.',s the _ day of 1484,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
E
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, C ITY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED Al; TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J. TAYLOR JR., CITY ATTORNCY
CITY OF D(ENT&N TEXAS
BY: (
MY of DEMON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL !WILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
M E sM URA N u U ;N
'CU; Mick 5venla, Assistant City Manager
FROM; Jerry Clark, City Engineer
DA'rL; July 31, 19b4
itE; Kesolution for hignway Contract Signature - City of
Denton
'i'he attacned resolution is needed to allow the City Manager to
sign ali contracts the City of Denton completes with Cne Texas
Department of Highways and Public 't'ransportation, An urgent
need exists with toe Loop 488 Utiiity Adjustment Contract about
• to be bid.
`this resolution should cover all other state contracts neederi
in the next few year/resolutions effective dates. Please
advise it further information is needed,
r
Je r C a k
Ci En eer
is
~Oi41t;
•
R E S 0 L U T 1 0N
WHEREAS, it is necessary from time to time for the City of
Denton to apply for a utility joint, uaf~ agreement or utility
permit Involving construction within the State Highway Department
right-of-way in the city of Denton) and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to obtain agreements and permits f::nh
said Higi.aay Department for said construction) and
WHEREAS, the City Manager through his office maKes applicati:;n
for said construction) NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RSSOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, rEXASi
SECTION I.
That the City Council of the City of Denton hereuy authorize=.
the City Manager acting in his official capacity to execute rr.e
appropriate documents as an official representative of the City
of Denton,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of ---o 1984.
R:CHARD 0, STEtIART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
August 7, 1984
CITY COUNCIL AGHNDA ITEM
SUBJEM
Consider proposed oversize Agreement With Joe Belew, for a
New Waterline on His Property from Windsor Drive along
Locust Street to Hercules Lane.
SUMMARY
Mr, Joe Belew is developing housing units adjacent to north
Locust Street. The Utility staff is desirous to
F articipate in oversizing the 8" waterline which will serve
Is development with 12" water transm ssi aon hen to
keeping with the Hogan and Rasor Study,
improve water serA ce throughout the City.
By City participation, 'che cost of this large transmission
main will be reduced to thelfCity in that Developer will pay
up to z 12waterline and the City will only
for aee dquivi ent 811
the size
pay
FISCAL SUMMARY;
Costs are estimated as follows:
Total cost of this ro ect
$87,600
3,650' of 12" Water Line @ $24/ft
Cost of this project to Joe Bel__ ew Development
$58,400
3,650' of 8" Water Line @ $16/ft
Cost of _this project to the ~:ity of_
Te`nton;
Difference between a 12" & 8" $L9~200
water line
Source of Funds.
Water Bond Funds Acct 0623-008-0461-9114
This project has not specifically been identified in t13e
Capital Improvements Program. However, monies have been
set aside for oversizing and collection mains sufficient to
fund such a project,
3109U:l
ACTION REQUIRHDi
City Council approval or disapproval of participation in
the oversizing of a 12" water line with Mr. Joe Below,
Developer,
ALTBRNATIVhS:
1. Approve request by Utility Department for this water
transmission main oversizing.
2. Disapprove request of Utility Department for this
water transmission main oversizing.
RECOM ENDA'I'I ON ,
Tlie Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of July 24,
1984, recommended to the City Council that the oversizing
participationi for a 12" water transmission main from
Windsor Drive to Hercules Lane along North Locust Street be
approved.
Res ectfull ,
, ~ WAtv~A_~
R. E, Nelson
:..rector of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Letter of Commitment-Joe Belew
II Location Map
III Hogan and Rasor Map-Alternative 3
IV Sewerline oversize agreement
V Minutes PUB Meeting of 7/24/84
31U9U:2
*104 BURKE ENGINEERING
0 111W BURKE, PAL
JEN4iNQ11 AZT I
COqwoma w6
21 June 1984
Hr. Dave Ham, P,R,
Water and Wastewater Division
City of Denton Utilities Department
Re: Windsor Park, Section One
Dear Dave:
We, the developers of Windsor Park, Section One, are writing to state our com-
mittment to participate with the City in the future installation of an 18"
waterline along the Western boundary of the entire Windsor Park project, We
will participate to the extent of the cost of an 8" line with the understanding
that the City will pay for oversizing expenses for anything larger. It is our
intention to install the waterline, including the portion that lies within
Windsor Park, Section One, as we develop the property fronting on F,M. 2164
to the North of Section One. The layout we understand is acceptable to the
City for this waterline is'shown schematically on the enclosed overall project
utility map and labeled J Z".
J o6
Bill Brady
406 S. CARROLL ST. n»s+•.m~ Oltll M,TEZAS7a=
1 rf C,i~ •Irrr r. ~M i~,M .,Iri f. vt'r'S/•V ..1 t,,.~ / rl~''1 ! ' , 1~ f♦~
14L WA Y
\ = Y.,rl
s pp ~ 1
r y,1i•J~ ~4t •rYYiMn~ I 1
{ ` / 44yf \f p
LI/
1 r\
.1'"% v ~ J gh4~~{91 , ~ ~ i ~ 1 mil' ~ C2
I ~ . y
1
A;~we.e`; i'i.1'AMIrM iyhusvwn gai t $741 \ S •°'•ai~S6l' ''1` ` I r
aiae~♦~/~e~r►Jr~Rge~rn c ENTON DENTO
%t.~ 1 , •1 I~ ~~1 WrM Y~IAIr.wi '~'r 4~ ~ ~ . ~ ~1 ~ I~il~~ ~ ~ E
Y\..i~ll . ! ~ r• r 'i xr~~!•+\~~YJI~r 'V~r.~ 1 .!!P..ls:• _ ~:y ~ a1
v , 11 N 1
it \ ` • ' r i I . O 1 ! ~''~~+/~r~ f: I
' , _ . ^`Il, i.I:. c. Ytl CtCf~ 4!' X11 ( I • ~ r
c . 11 tiAQ" ' i \ R r"' ~...a•.~3 II._. VV f IfL ftwI\"~Wmw wit-ON
-u YM?i1 tip yr _ c1J
'Ij ~''S, . y 1 t •a `1`•• vn. •rI it~r'✓ J~Zl~ ~1.
1 1: v-: y~y.-~. Y[~t'_-Y.:~.a`a~MHC ar y..i •l 1 I yl..,~
r n u.a7'.,.- v s._tM~-r a , 1 r~ qi 6~• G,Y ` '
7.7
o f.. ) y~-~ I, 'Ii ..~r~j= L. •1 IiaYl ' 3`1 F I "Sctl htlrh'f. '°'~y`v,~ ' ;.,e-~.
" I, } C''• I) ; fti~ 11 ._L., Y I . .va x , -a; ~Spr9 ;iya
+-aMn.a m+I a s, d r 1 .I y fr Il . 1~ yS 171 3 OR
NW fa+ '
IJIa ♦ !
T~U 15nM~p I~, 1 i'rP= ~I 1
,n ) ~Ip ~ r► 'J ~ I ? V,I ~ h~ h011~\: ~ i .l' • ~ f ' ' + l 'f ~
~ 1~ mot} 1 t• I 1 r ,
,y f K~• !~r ~r~r~ LtY 1 ' I' ~~c'"'q-` , 1 r L• }31'~i;~ I 1
6 =t I- + ~ ~~.I L.y' i, ~ '1,,7r ~ J~ 11 .5f11T 'r I }I
.44
'I it r 1 r a p ] f. rf. }
• ~ 'J'am' I r. I ~ I ~I }
-So
..~lr ,r.. • ,••I ! -•-.aa:•I'd~~wJl'.. A~ Y'f.~3$~111~~1.1\9' ICI f jl 1';\ • r, i"J~q~ r ?
TUN
wI y\11pg:IT1' f!, ~~E~
~ ~a/` ar -~•ri>~-,~,^ I J~ I,,. rIJ, ~'~i .'Tix y"Z C..q. _ \ + / , ! ! I I 1 ` 1~
\ J 1
P!! 1, kE ~f:; 1 fi za if L)} l 1 i it J
~l f , ~C}i r5yflJr ~r$1~ 5th''t O.i i h••~ ~''/1~ - _ l .J r
1
y r'
' Hlgh fr'I ( I rM Gf
.~rS ~a(.~~-.~16 Je , i fY
Z .r•-.: a..r r ti, OI , I.1= _ Z• i.• l . ' . l I I /t 1
O I 1 u'^1 1 1 r r S ~ G
I -W _u if I Y r
40 CF
A P / 7 !
,J~.-...-._
I , r ~.',:lv J " ~ P.~ fV 11011V' ~ I/' I'.11v4k~r S t<*7C;irr ~ i
n, ra { f t r
I
~n
t r ~h;r. , -=1.• ~ t ,L II.J' of ~ ~ Y ~I•rr4~,lll I. ! : , : ~ f •
® ~1
01AV
~11CI',4f10'44 IA/ ~Jy11frC, ~wur'r ,.~rer'~'
1A 7oT4 A) mote 4
t 36Se+ fr,
9f 2~
m t 9 s
.f`
r r 1
B L r
L ~ , 1 N Y
% La ~ ~ is
fi r r ~ ~ 1~
tit J ~'my t ^v.
r V
v a t 4
L 1
i
mt it r }J I ~
k) 0
VW d U LJ r t N~ t
k~ 0)
Cd P1 S W W.. 1 i
~ r
tL
•l t L.
y 8
S L E ~~~S
~ yyn
1
~r
D
LJ
b 3 !
CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS
t~iRL4b."" k 0%"A xAoa.r{ ALTERNATE NO. 3
COMPUTER INDEX MAP
- raw.,a wr
- wnan.r.,,u., HOGAN a AASOR, ,n..
WATERLINE OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
i
THE STATE OF TEXAS S
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE FRESENTSI
COUNTY OF DENTON S
THAT WHEREAS, JOE 84LEW, RFD 51 DENTONi TEXAS, 76201 (817)
382-9457, is the Developer of certain property shown on the
attached map, which map is incorporated herein as If set forth
in full, In the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and
further described as property on North Locust St ,f and Developer
desires to serve such property with 3,6$0 feet of on alto water
line faotlitiesr and,
WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires that such on site water
facilities be oversized and the City will participate in the
additional Cost of the oversized facilities pursuant to the pro-
visions of the Denton Development Code, Appendix A to the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texasl
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT? made this day of
_ , 1904, by and between J08 BELEW, hereinafter
called 'DeVeloper'1 and the City of Denton? Texas, A Home Rule
municipal Corporation of the state of Texas, hereinafter called
'City'
W I7'NESSETH I
1, The Developer will Install, by contract or otherwlse, a
12" waterline and ap up rteninces to serve the property described
on the attached map in accordance with all City of Denton
ordinances, rules, regulations, policies and procedures. The
said facilities shall be ).ocated as shown on the attached map
which is made a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference.
2. The City's share of the estimated cost of said facilities
is $29,200. Upon cumplet~.on of construction and acceptance by
the City of said facilities, the actual cost of she City's
participation in said facilities shall be determined and
certified to by the Director of Utilities, and his certificate
setting out the City's coat of said facilities shall be attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
WATERLINE OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/WITH JOE RELEW-PAGE 1
1
,
3, The City shall pay for its share of the facilities within
thirty (30) days from the date of acceptance of the faoillties,
or under such terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable
to the parties.
4, Title to said facilities Is hereby and shall at all times
be vested in the City,
5. The Developer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify
and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or
liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury to
property or third person occasioned by any act or omission,
neglect or wrong-doing of Developer, its officers, agents,
employees, invitees, contractors or other persons with regard to
the performance of this contract, and Developer will, at its own
cost and expense, defend and protect against any and all such
claims and demands,
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed In triplicate
originals this day of r 1984,
JOE BELEW (OWNER)
BY:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
RICHARD 0. 5TE`AART, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
ROBERT B. HUNTER
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
WATERLINE OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/WITH JOE BELEW-PAGE 2
JI
s l ilk 0WAY (i dl r
% TO
41
w lit
rl wyMw"ar~Oq •~''k r:, ti; ~ 1'• q lu
l 1 • ~1 I
I I P 1 r.cr'l . 11 L
i ~.:~ia aa~ 4w~+a r. I , v~ .r1111r \5 , 11 r
I I r~
/ l I `I ) \ at a as . 4,• ~ hli - `
•I ~ r .1 I r - 1. {
e 7~nrvar+~i 1 11~~;~ 676 d ' 1 ;1 f J a~--...~
~ I ~~rl[L rar♦y/°~L ar..n .a~~~NJ , irl,a 1_"I
3&50' cf !'RbmlsBC ! ENTON DENTbi rl
, I
,''~L-' •Irll II I t• ~ j ,''N :y,"''apaa~ra
ic>i.r:^.1--s~'rc.o.>..1,1.~ns~.:~ ,C..~; ,~~,~n.~ w.+.s~'• I ~1~~~y'A, ~ \
, ± T'Ci.✓ 5 I, 111 IY II~ 1 I II • ~f \1•
•qC..-.~v. • O r 1.~yR~,.'• may `r /..li 11,11 Y ~:q y ,
.1 T
I• J .w. r, • t' -.~r _ L..~. 1/i191 ° ~1 `I 41 IrSC d'11Ce`~•
~-r Po
4s.
4
BM
Deus>Il n-1 •a' •')/el .jl I, 41 `F11~7,Fg1 ~JA
B ~~_s~i j - tl 2' I?a'• a q I(..
•,.,_,'.w I' !r-'~-~ I r•1 ~ ~ ~11I ~ li. Te,.t15t any 'I 1J
ffl I . , • , # I rl•t
• 1 ~+r~-f ;I~r' V 1 I CrtlYtrfl `5 1T
z<
r,..~.~rlnc'.~,'S. \ ,-:1f=~'~ I 'i )11• 1r7, ~ *I r' r
„ I 11 r ,n: a I! il~' ! lil 4
1
TEXAS J15611.1\S Is~l I Il l!~ ) 1 e I ~a ~f rDE L ~ 4
D
-_rrr .a.-. „ a•rl I \I r 1. ~11};(~a la r I' ~ I s' ,'n ~I G ~ ~5~ 1`,t
vx. ~'I SV.~\ y F ".~_b~/q\ 1 O.,_- r~.:~i'~ ~ (r rrr ',1\ r //`.~,~l~r~i~l ~.~.i-. _'•''I
~aa y H n \ s ~ ~xyl H I' i A'1'.".'I M~. Y ~r Y ~'i l y / \(3' ✓ ' ~ IV .r'
50~ I qy ~tobrrt H: Lel Cri{dam A,
- ''t_ ~ ~R~ fCEN l I_'i$ I,r I Sa~h=T' c M ~ H r~~ i f'
1A F~j
~,,I<I~h { a~;~~~~•!:~{t+ rL~~M~~rl~~r. a ~f~••~'~ I I J} .5 1
svta 1. ITV
br
ti
QI ,I: tai l.tTf~ ~ t 1',' I I ~ { ~ ?"3Y.'Y. ''_i,~Y cK.4S r~ O , I S, I1
ffLL I -r 4,
v o ULEf f f m ,~,V ]
• r Tr~ rte, h r 'l.,l rT• ~ ~ a it I + ~ - .li`
' h H Y II t ~ y i. i 1'~.rrlu6~~~l~fl~ r__ 1 ( ~`t• 1..r,..
F1111
~I, ~:'st ~._~Y ► s~', .N„',' JelfYr3u n.,'l ' , ,
-777
CONSIDER ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BLACK AND
VlArCR R ENGINEBRINU V9510 ND ON TRUi MA AGSM NT
OF IS I YDROE ECTRI PROJECT,
Nelson opened discussion on this item by covering the 3
alternatives for compensation to Black and Veatch, The
Staff recommends labor rate time 1,8$ with not-to-exceed,
Exhibit 11. $241,000 design and $104,000 res. engineer.
Out-n£-pocket is direct without multiplier.
Contract has a maximum of 5% salary escalation pet, year and
includes $10,000 for additional FERC licensing. Project
will be funded by bond funds. Boyd questioned this,
desiring to wait until the bond funds are available.
The Board expressed a desire to visit with Black and Veatch
prior to approval of the proposed engineering contract. No
definite dates were established at this time for such a
field visit. No furth°r action taken.
At this point, Edward Coomes left the meeting (8;15 AM) to
teach class.
6, CONSIDER QUITCLAIM OF MILL RUN EASEMENT.
The property owner has requested that the unused easement
be quitclaimed in order to construct Mill Run Apartments,
The request has been approved by the Development Review
Committee in their June 5, 1984, meeting.
After a brief discussion, Herring made a motion to
recommend to the City Council approval of the abandonment
and quitclaim of the dill Run easement, second by Thompson,
4 ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
7. CONSIDER PROPOSED OVERSIZE AGREEMENT WITH JOE BELEW FOR A
NEW WATERLINE ON RIS PROPERTY FROM WINDSOR DRIVB ALONG
LOCUST STREET TO HERCULES LATE;
David Ham presented this item to the Board representing,
3,650' of proposed 12" water line on North Locust, The II
Hogan and Rasor Study shows an 18" line would be required.
However, there is presently a 12" line on the other side of
the street, and rather than putting in an 1811 line, the
staff has determined that the existing 12" line plus the
proposed 12" line will give sufficient capacity to equate
to an 18" line. To oversize subject line from 8" to 12",
using existing bond funds, would cost the City $29,200.
Mr. Joe Belew is developing housing units adjacent to north
Locust Street. The Utility Staff is desirous to
participate in oversizing the 8" waterline which will serve
his development witli a 12" water transmission main in
keeping with the Hogan and Rasor Study to improve water
service throughout the City.
PLM MNUMS 7/24/84
By City particippation, tihe cost of this large transmission
main will be reduced to the City in that Developer will pay
for an equivilent 8" size waterline and the City will only
pay the difference up to 12" size.
After general discussion, Herring made a motion to
recommend to the City Council that the City participate in
this water line oversizing, second by Thompson, 5 ay,)s, no
nayes, motion carried.
CONSIDER PROVIDING WATER/SbWBR SERVIC13 TO TRI ST136G
STRUCTURES RH BRANCH OU D RO N C
AND PRO RATA AGREEMENTS:
Brian Burke, Engineer for Tri Steel Structures Corporation,
has requested water and sewer service to a proposed office
site just outside of the Denton city limits yet within the
extraterritorial jurisdiction. They also request
associated pro rata agreements for the offsite water and
sewer lines.
The Utility Department would additionally request an
oversizing participation to a 12" size in keeping with the
Hogan and Rasor Water Distribution Study. These extended
lines are in a city limit strip to the edge of this new
development; therefore, oversizing participation is
appropriate,
All costs are estimates:
Total Cost of Project
2500 of lZn water line @ $24/ft $60,000
2000' of 10" sewer line @ $20/ft 40,000
Total cost $ X66
Cost to Serve Tri Steel Structures Corporation
2 00 of 8' water line 16 ft 400000
2000" of 10" sewer line @ $20/ft 40 000
Total Cost to Serve Tri Steel 80,000
Cost to Cit for oversizin
Waterline 60,000 - 409000) $20,000
Sewerline 0
Source of Funds Water Bond Funds
Account Y 623-008-0461-9114
tf~~
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE OF MEETING: August 7, 1984
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM (USE EXACT WORDING AS ITE14 IS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA)
Approval of Rady & Associates as consultant for temporary
engineering plan review.
SUMMARY:
Due to our civil eAgineera position being vacated by resignation
and continued high levels of plan review; a temporary review consultant
is being requested until the position is filled.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Last selection took about 5 months to fill. Review time will be
at salary times a 2,5 multiplier,
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve contract with o month maximum time period.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Reject contract
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
2. Approve contract
EXHIBITS:
1. Memo to Rick Svehla
2, Proposal from Rady
l -
0MY01WNMNt TNX" MUNICIPAL WILDING / DWON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $66.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
DA'Z'E; July 25, 1984
RE; Consideration of Rady & Associates for Engineering Plan
Review
The civil engineers position in the Engineering Division has
been handling all the plan review for the Development Review
Committee. That position will be vacant on August 1, with
Pablo Rubio's resignation. Development has continued to stay
at high levels with many large tracts, Most of these tracts
require detailed engineering plans for streets, drainage, water
and sewer improvements.
To enable me to continue my other duties as City Engineer such
as bond project design, flood plain administration, etc., major
plan review needs to be handled by a consultant until the
position can be refilled. Last time, it took about five months
to obtain a qualified person who could handle the work
involved. Roger Wilkinson, Charlie McKenna and I will handle
all small sets of plans, all plats and most of the general
items processed in Development Review Committee. We will only
require Rady's services if large tracts enter the platting.
Rady was one of three companies asked to submit a proposal last
year when the same type of overload nit, They were one of two
firms seriously considered for this work as they handle plan
review for many small9r towns and cities around Fort Worth.
They are now writing a master plan for Denton County for
services needed in the next 20 years, They have designed our
last two bridge projects in tine City so they are familiar with.
Denton and the staff. Your consideration of this matter will
be appreciated.
C.(~~t,._
Jer C a k
Cit Ena eer
0241E
ASSI~dd tes, Inc.
July 24, 1984
Mr. Jerry Clark
City Engineer
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney Street
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr. Clarkt
Rady and Associates, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to respond to the
City of Denton's request for a proposal to provide tubdivision review
services. Our firm has provided expertise in this field to Texas cities
since 1924. Through this experience, we are very well qualified to
assist the City with its particular needs.
Based on an evaluation of Denton's specific requirements, Mr. Charles M.
Staplea, F.E. has been designated as the Project Manager responsible for
the City's subdivision review. As Project Manager for the City of
Denton, Mr. Staples will be assisted by staff engineers who have
specific expertise in storm drain hydraulics, street design, and water
and sewer system design. The educational and professional
qualifications of the individuals representing these fields of expertise
are detailed in the resumes accompanying this proposal.
It is the policy of Rady and Associates, Inc., when reviewing
developers' plans, to coordinate and cooperate with the developer and
his engineer to assure an expeditious review. However, our primary
obli,vition is to the City in assuring that the proposed construction
will ultimately result in a subdivision which is an asset to the
community and in compliance with the governing ordinances, rules and
regulations.
It has been our experience that the physical features of a subdivision
and the quality and completeness of plans submitted by developers vary
significantly. Therefore, the time required to adequately review and
comment on plans also varies. However, when submitted, plans are
complete and prepared in accordance with the City's subdivision rules
and regulations, we anticipate an average subdivision can be reviewed,
commented on and returned to the City within approximately five working
days.
To provide the services outlined in the City's request for proposal, our
compensation will be the salary cost of the personnel involved times a
multiplier of 2.5 which includes general and administrative overhead
items and profit. The salary cost will be the actual direct wages paid
the employees engaged in the work, plus the associated employee
benefits.
910 CoW a Street Port Wortb. Texas 76102 8170"11
City of Denton
Page 2.
The following hourly salary rates will apply for our servicest
Principal $2444 - per hour
Project Manager $15.00 - $2100 par hour
Project Engineer $12.00 - $16.00 per hour
Engineer $ 9.00 - $12.00 per hour
Drafting $ 5.00 - $ 9.00 per hour
surveyor $ 4.00 - $ 9.00 per hour
Clerical $ 4.00 - $ 7.00 per hour
Rady and Associates, Ina., since its formation 60 years. ago, has been
recognized for the professional excellence that has provided our
municipal clients with the engineering competency necessary for the
efficient, orderly development of their community. The strongest
affirmation of our firm's professional qualifications is our clients.
Attached is a representative listing of client references which we
encourage you to contact regarding our capabilities in subdivision
review.
We intend this letter proposal to respond directly to your request for
proposals We will be happy to furnish you any additional information
which might assist you in evaluating our proposals We welcome your
questions and comments and will look forward to working with you in
planning the future of the City of Denton.
Very truly yours,
RADY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
f- gt~
*Al,
Derrell E. J Anson, P.Es
President
DEJ;mkr
Encl.
CLIENT REFERENCES
W) of Azle Barry Dalin, Jr. 613 S,E. Parkway
City Manager Axle, TX 76020
(817) 444-2541
City of Benbrook C,W4 Rogers 911 Winsaott Rd.
Assistant City Manger For t)Worm, TX 76126 2491000
City of Copperas Lester Pack, P•E• P. 0. Drawer 280 Cove City Engineor Copperas Cove, TX 76522
(817) 547-4221
City of Forest Kill CityoMaanager 6800 Forest Bill Dr.
Fort Worth, TX 76119
(817) 293-3695
City of Haltom City CPat ity MManager P, 0. Box 14246
Fort Worth, TX 76117
(817) 834-7341
City !f Keller Johnny Sartain P. 0. Box 770
City Manager Keller, TX 76248
(817) 431-1517
City of Saginaw Jon Ed Robbins P. 0. Drawer 79070
City Manager Saginaw, TX 76179
(817) 232-4640
City of Weatherford cKenneth Reneau ity Manager P. 0. Box 255
Weatherford, TX 76086
(817) 594-5441
City of White Mike Groomer 214 Meadow Park Dr.
City Manager Fort Worth, TX 76108
Settlement Y (817) 246-4971
LAW OFFICES
MCCALL, PARKHURST & HORTON
NOROY H. MQOALL 000 DIAMOND SHAMROCK TOWER 'a~ ~N,INOu
PAUL a. NORTON MILLARO ►AwMHVA$f
►LTCR M. tARt DALLAS. TCXAS 78801•eSe7 11*00•1*Tal
RICHAwo C, ►ORitw
AN09LO R ►ARMCR Awk♦ COOL [I♦ 740.0001 CLARCNCt t. CROW[
O. CHA*I.CS K00014N ❑*01•IN[I
T[L[CON[11: JI. 7~0•YOIO
THOMAS t.►OSOHARRKY0
MCNNCTH C. 1472
JOHN W RVGOTTOM August 1, 1984
JtrewtY A. ItUSOHCI
THOMAS K..1►VROCON
L,C. ORIZAOLARA, OY
KCNNCYM A ARTINO
41109N[[0 IN N[W WORM ONLY
Mr. G. Chris Hartung
City Manager, City of Denton
215 s. McKinney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Chris:
You have requested our opinion as to whether or not an
election is required by law as a prerequisite to the issuance and
delivery of utility system revenue bonds of the City, in view of
section 9.01(4) of the Denton Home Rule Charter, which provides
that no revenue bond issue in excess of $i,000►000 shall be
"ordered" until a "nonbinding referendum election" has been held.
Article Xi, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution specifically
stated that no Home Rule Charter shall contain any provision
"inconsistent" with the general laws enacted by the Texas Legis-
lature. Vernonls Articles 1111b and 1112, being general laws
enacted by the Texas Legislature, authorize all cities, including
Home Rule Cities, to issue utility system revenue bonds for
improvements and extentions to utility systems in any amounts
without the necessity of an election. It is our opinion that
under these circumstances Section 9.01(d) of the Denton Charter
is "inconsistent" with the general laws of Texas, and therefore
invalid and of no legal force or effect. Even though the refer-
endum called for by Section 9.01(d) is called "nonbinding", it
constitutes an additional requirement, encumbrance, expense, and
delay in the ability of the city to issue revenue bonds, and
therefore is "inconsistent" with the general laws. It is also
obvious that as a practical matter, a "nonbinding" referendum
would be a political impossibility.
There are many court decisions dealing with matters of this
general nature, and our opinion is based on such decisions. You
are aware that the law requires the Attorney General of Texas to
approve the validity of all bonds issued by the City. We can
advise you that many other cities have charter provisions which
purport to require elections or referendums in connection with
revenue bonds, for example, San Antonio, Austin, and Corpus
Christi. Both we and the Attorney General frequently have
approved revenue bonds for these cities without elections,
notwithstanding any charter requirements. The Public Finance
Mr, G. Chr'is' Hartung
August 1, 1984
Page 2
Division of the Attorney General's Office has been contacted
concerning your particular situation, and verbal assurance has
been given that your Charter referendum election requirement
would be ignored.
We might remind you also that your non-voted Utility System
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1983, were issued after Section
9.01(d) of your Charter was adopted. Had Section 9.01(d) been
effective, a referendum would have been required. So you already
have a precedent for issuing revenue bonds without a referendum.
One more point to be mace is that Vernon's Article 2368,:
requires in eftect that before issuing revenue bonds unclea,
Articles 1111 and 1112, a notice of intention to issue the bonds
roust be given. If at least 108 of the qualified voters sign a
petition requesting a referendum on the issuance of the revenue
bonds a binding referendum on the issuance thereof must be held.
You can see that if Section 9.01(d) of your Charter were applied,
therb might first be a nonbinding referendum, then a binding
referendum. This, in our opinion, further increases the objec-
tionable inconsistencies with the general laws.
Sincerely yours,
McCALL, PARKHURST & HORTON
by
~ 74~ ~
au B. Horton
PSHtcp
1xx" tlONfCfPAL BULL L9N ON, AA hf%
7usx~ c 1
(ek
AjK~~
CITY OF DENTON PAGE OF -L
POLICY lADXIN18TRATIVI PROOSDUAWADHINISTxi
SECTION: I up= BaMI
eel~
RET-AIPTONS
0 O1
BCTIVS GATE:
SUBJECT:
ATT9NDANQE r 17-84
li'FIC
71TLHi a PLACes:
ARQEKTULbMZTARDINESS 4,10
POLICY STATEMENTI
Employees shall be required to be at their places of work in aooordanoe with
these policies and procedures. All departments shall maintain attendance
records of employees.
Absenteeism and tardiness on the part of employees increases the work load of
fellow employees, interferes with productivity, and reduoes the quality of
service.
The absence from work of any employee usually involves the rearrangement of
work schedules and the temporary reassignment of other employees. To
accomplish these tasks, sufficient advance notice of absence is necessary.
Unauthorized absence, failure to return at the expiration of a leave of
absence, or being absent without leave for a period of at least one working
day or shift of duty shall be deemed an automatic resignation, Such a
resignation may be rescinded by the department director if the employee
presents satisfactory reasons for failure to report the absence within three
working daya of the effective date of the automatic resignation.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURESt
I, Procedure Tor Reporting Absences
A. Each department, division, or section shall designate an individual
who will be responsible for receiving absentee calls.
B. To be eligible for paid sick leave an employee must report his/her
absence to the designee by a time to be determined by each
department, division, or section, not to exceed one half (112) hour
after his/her regularly scheduled work day begins. (See Policy
111.01: Sick Leave)
~u l v tr „.I
C1tt MArIAGE l
r`
'QTY OF DENTON M44.,.._.0F,_,_
POLICY/ADMINIST*ATIVR PRO0XI)VI1i/ADHININTRATM DIXXQTIVX
R£F£HSNCS
SECTIOW NUMBEW
T NS 102.10
eFFECTlve DATE;
SUBJECT;
EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT 7-17-84
REPLACES;
TITLE:
MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS
POLICY STATEMENT:
It is the policy of the City of Denton to require certain employees as
determined by the job specification to be examined by a physician under
certain circumstances described below. No one who is given a medical
examination shall, be employed unless the examining physician certifies that
the person meets the minimum standards of physical fitness required for the
position.
Medical examinations may be used to ensure that employees remain in good
physical condition in order to perform the demands of the job.
As a condition of employment, and based upon job requiraments, all prospective
or transferring employees may be required to pass a physical examination
administered by a physician designated by the City of Denton.
Employees may be required to have a physical examination on other occasions,
such as promotion, or whenever the employee's supervisor determines that a
potential health problem may prevent an employee from performing his/her job
duties.
I. Conditions of Nmployment
A. Physical examinations required by the City of Denton for promoted,
transferred, or current employees shall be paid for by the City of
Denton. Time spent by an employee in waiting for and receiving a
physical examination shall be considered hours worked for pay
• purposes.
B. Supervisors are responsible for notifying the Personnel/Employee
Relations Department of any positions which place physical or
environmental demands on the employee. Such positions will be
reviewed by the Personnel/Employee Relations Department in order to
evaluate and determine the type and extent of medical examinations
required prior to job performance.
II. PaLnAent: of Medical Examinations
A. Medical examinations paid for by the City of Denton are the property
of the City of Denton and shall be confidential. A copy of the
medical examination report shall be available to the employee upon
written request.
PAQI- 010
• POLICY/ADMINtSTIATIVY plOCIDURR/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRLCTIV= (0oottarsd)
REFERENCE
NUMBER:
TITLE: 107.10
lSEDIGAL aY~NINATI0113 -
B, When the City of Denton requires a physical examination or
physician's report concerning on illness or injury suffered by an
employee, the examination shall be at the expense of the City of
Denton and performed by a physician selected by the City of Denton,
C. Such examinations may be authorized by the Director of Persnnnel
only, Employees who are not satisfied with the physician's
dstvi-urination may submit a report from a physician of their own
choosing and at their own expense, in the event of conflicting
opinions, the City of Denton may employ a third physician to examine
the employee. The City of Denton will pay for this third physica
examination.
perform the hjothe demands of
emyioyeecs involved$ along
b duties, will
D. the joboand the the
be the basis for a decision.
III. Civil service
In the case of n', rejectioof a n shall apply appointment,
or for. promotion;
wishes to challenge the rejection.
Vernon's Civil Statutes, Article 1259p, is available for review at the
City of Denton Public Library and the departments of Fire, Police, and
Personnel/Employee Relations.
02488
7/11/84
r
C*TY OF DENTON J
P0LTC;'l/ADM1NI8TIlATIVX PlOOSDURVADMINISTRATWX DIRICTI.»
SECTION. R!SUBJECT: IVE OATI:
EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT' 7-8a
ES:
TITLE:
IN-HOUSE ADVANCEMENT
POLICY STATEMENT:
The City of Denton',,, in-house advancement policy is to make every effort to
fill job vacancies by in-house advancement of qualified employees to positions
withi:6 the City. The authority to submit an employee requisition to fill a
vacancy is delegated to supervisory staff by department directors, Requesting
supervisors will specify, in the requisition, when a vacancy is an in-house
advancement opportunity for employees within the city. For any posted
vacancy, all employees shall haven an equal opportunity to apply as long as
they meet the minimum qualifications.
An in-house advancement is defined of a muve to a classification having a
greater base rate of pay than the classification the employee is leaving. In
most cases, the employee being considered will start ar the base step of the
new classification, or receive a five percent increase in salary,
whichever is higher, Requests for exceptions to this practice must be
submitted by the department director to the Personnel Director for approval.
The decision for an in-houu o advancement will be based on the quality of each
applicant's prior performane on the job as per the class specifications and
jab description. Other areas to be considered are attendance records,
education, records of progression, completiosi of training or developmental
assignments; awards, letters of. commendation, and details of leadership
experiences where appropriate.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES:
1. Job Announcements
A. To process an in--house advancement request, the requesting
supervisor is to submit an employee requisition to Personnel
indicating an advancement opportunity within the City.
B. An in-house Promotional Opportunity notice is posted in specified
places as indicated in Policy 101.01 where it can be viewed by all
employees of the City of Denton. Qualified employees who have
filled out job vacancy cards will be notified in writing by
Personnel of the vacancy.
C. The job notice will indicate job title, pay range, job duties,
minimum educational requirement, experience, availability of
additional information and application procedures.
kOILIOT/AbMINIBTRATIVX PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIV3I DIRECTIVI (Continued)
REP6RENCI
TITM NUM8 1
_~oHOT1oN 104.04
D. If no qualified applicants have applied at the end of an in-house
posting period, the position will. automatically be opened to the
general public.
E. All employees either within or outside the department who made
application for the position shall be notified concerning the status
of their application.
II, performance Review
A. Immediate supervisors are responsible for training the employee in
new ,jab duties, for keeping the employed aware of his/her progress,
acid for making recommendations for specific areas of improvement.
H. The employee shall be periodically reviewed in job performance.
Unless otherwise established, the reviews will follow the schedule
for the job family of the new position. This review schedule will
place no limitations or restrictions upon accumulation or use of any
benefit to which the employee is entitled.
C. The employers who has failed to satisfactorily perform the duties of
the job at the time of the review may be subject to performance
demotion or termination.
111. Civil Service
All fire anO police civil service promotions are governed by Vernon's
Civil Statutes 1269m, Sections 9 through 14.
The Vernon's Civil Statutes, Article 1269m, is available for review in
the Emily Fowler Public Library and the Departments of Fire, Police, and
Personnel/Employee Relations.
li
0251g
7/11/64
CITY of DENTON FA131-1,.,.0FI.
POLIMAD1t111IATRATIVD FROG UNWADMIIi18TRATIVS D1120TIVI
RefaRaaca
SUCTION: NUMOM
PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 111.02
eFFECTIVe DAM
suWcT:
APPROVED LEAVE 7-17-84
A 6"CES:
TITLE:
JURY DITTY 4 ,11
POLICY STATEMENTt
Leave with pay will be granted to all City employees when called to appear for
jury duty, as a witness or other official participant in court, except where
an employee is the plaintiff or defendant of a proceeding which arises out of
an off-duty activity not related to City employment, Employees are not
required to reimburse the City for any payments made to them by other
governmental agencies fov jury or subpoenaed witness duty.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURESt
I. The employee must provide as early notice as possible, and be propared
to show documentation upon request by the immediate supervisor,
II. The employee is expected to retu.^n -to work if proceedings are dismissed
earlier than one (1) hour before the close of the scheduled work day.
III, Jury duty service or court proceedings may sometimes occur during an
employee's vacation. At the supervisor's discretion, the scheduled
vacation period may be extended a corresponding amount of time, or tho
cancelled portion of the vacation may be returned to accrued vacation
balance if such time has already been deducted.
02528
7/3/84
CITY OF DENTON
A1.10T/ADMINUTZATIVR tROORDORR/ADNII/IXTRATIVI DII1180TIY1i
' R4F@R6N04
SECTION: NUMtSM
PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 107,02
EFFECTIVE DATE:
SUEUECT;
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND SERVICES 7-17-84
REPLACES;
TITLE:
HOLIDAYS 4,3
POLICY STATEMENT
The following holidays are declared official holidays for permanent full time
and permanent part time employees)
New Year's Day
Memorial Lay
Independence Day
Labor Day
Thanksgiving
Friday After Thanksgiving
Christmas Eve
Christmas Day
A holiday shall be defined as a period of-eight (8) hours at straight rates.
Holidays occurring on Saturday will be observed on the proceeding Friday and
holidays occurring on Sunday will be observed on the following Monday.
All permanent employees are eligible after completion of one day of work.
Permanent part-time (includes one-half and three-quarter time) employees ,no
work twenty (20) hours per week or more shall be entitled to holiday pay at a
rate equivalent to the budgeted pay classification of either one-half (112) or
three-quarter (3/4) time.
Seasonal and temporary employees will be paid their regular rates on a holiday
only if required to work.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDUREI
I. Working on Holidays
A. All non-exempt employees who are required to work a designated
holiday shall be given equivalent hours off (the date of time off is
subject to supervisor's approval), or may be paid time and a half
rates for the hours worked in addition to their regular pay,
B. Exempt employees who are required to work on a designated holiday
should refer to Compensatory Time Policy 106.05.
0 F-2.
1 POLIMAOMMISTRATIVS P1001Dt1MAI)MINUT19ATIVI DIRICTITV, (Oxxlfxwe~}
R8p6RtNCt
TITLE HOLIDAYS
C, When the holiday and regular day off occur on the same day, those
non-exempt employees who are scheduled off duty on that day will be
entitled to additional pay at regular rates or an alternate holiday
off.
Exempt employees will be given an alternate day off. The date of
the day off is subject to the supervisor's approval,
II, UNAUTHORIZED A13SENCE - HOLIDAYS
A. An employee who has an unauthorized absence on the day immediately
preaeeding or following a holiday shall lose pay for the holiday as
well as for that day,
B. An employee absent without permission when scheduled to work a
holiday, is not entitled to holiday pay, and is subject to
disciplinary action.
III. TERMINATION - HOLIDAYS
If the last day of employment falls on the holiday, the employee will
not be paid for that holiday,
IV. HOLIDAY PAY FOR WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND SHORT-TERM DISABILITY
An employee on workers' compensation, or on an approved short-term
disability leave, will receive holiday pay only when the employee would
have been normally authorized to be paid for that holiday,
V. RELIGIOUS OR OTHER NATIONAL HOLIDAYS
With leave approved by the supervisor, an employee may request one of
the followings
A, Request authorized leave without pay,
B. Request charged to compensation time off, or,
C. Vacation time off.
02'l4a
7/3/84
WY OF DENTON fAGR..~,..OP.~.
POLICT/ADMININTZATIVY PROOSDUIX/ADM1XISTRATIVA DIRXCTIVN
SECTION: REPdRINU
NUMBER:
106,05
SUBJECT: EPPECTIVE DATE;
AGE AND SALARY PLAN 17-17-84
TITLE: REPLACES;
COMPENSATORY TIME
POLICY STATEMENTI
The City of Denton provides compensatory time at the discretion of the
supervisor in lieu of paid overtime. Compensatory time is defined as time off
taken as compensation for approved hours worked beyond an eighty (80) hour pay
period. The overtime policy 106.04 requires all employees to work overtime
when necessary and as directed by the supervisor.
At the discretion of the supervisor, compensatory time off at the rate of one
and one-half times the hours worked may be granted in lieu of paid overtime.
A maximum of eighty (80) hours oompensatory time may be accrued. All time
accrued beyond that limit will be converted to overtime pay at the current pay
rate.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURESI
1. Non-Exempt Employees
Service Maintenance 1-B, Office Clerical 1-11, Technical Para
Professional 1-5
A Prior to working any overtime, employees must check with their
supervisor to make sure compensatory time is or will be authorized.
B. Work performed by an employee in excess of normal working hours
will not be automatically considered for compensatory time and must
be specifically authorized in advance by the supervisor. ?or
examples Work during meal times, before and after normal working
hours, or work taken home.
0. Compensatory time shall not be granted unless accurate, official
compensatory time records are submitted by the employee and
approved by the supervisor.
D. Employees who leave the service of the City shall be paid for
accumulated compensatory time which has not been taken as time off
prior to the date of termination.
E. Compensatory time may be taken in minimum intervals of one hour at
the discretion of the supervisor.
0
PO61CTIADMINI1ITRATIVI PROCTIDUNIUADMINIATRATIV3 DIXZCTIYD
RRpRR8NC8
71TLP.; NU HR;
COMPENSATORY TIME 106,05
IT, Exempt Employees
A. Professional Pay Range 1-51 Management 115
1, Time worke6 beyond an eighty (80) hour pay period constitutes
compensatory time off at a rate of one to one. An employee mount
have prior approval before working any overtime for compensatory
time to be granted,
2. A maximum of eighty (80) hours of compensatory time may be
accrued. Accruing the maximum of eighty (80) hours of
compensatory time does not exclude an employee from being
required to work overtime when necessary or requested by the
supervisor due to workload demands,
3. Compensatory time shall not be granted unless aoourate, official
re,,,ords are kept within the appropriate department and approved
by the supervisor.
4. Exempt employees who leave the service of the City shall not be
paid for accumulated compensatory time.
5. In emergency situations only, as determined by the supervisor,
employees in M/1-3 pay range may, in lieu of paid overtime,
receive compensatory time off at a rate of one and one-half
times the hours worked,
6. An employee who works overtime not specifically requested by hie
supervisor, must check with the oupervisor prior to working the
overtime if he wishes to be considered for compensatory time,
7. Work performed by an employee in excess of normal working hours
will not autocratically be considered for compensatory time
unless specifically author'zed in advance by the supervisor.
For example; Work during meal times, before and after normal
working hours, or work taken home.
B. Professional Pay Rarrge 5-10; Management 4-5
1. Senior level positions require a full commitment that may at
times result in hours worked beyond an eighty (80) hour pay
period without compensation.
2. Supervisors of senior level positions will determine, by the
nature of the work load, occa.ional discretionary time off for
hours worked beyond an eighty (80) hour pay period.
3. Discretionary time is defined as time off taken in a flexible
mariner, as approved by the immediate supervisor that does not
equal or exceed the number of ex+ra hours worked.
1
FAOE.. L0I'..-L
POLICY/ADMINIOTRATIVX PROCZDURVADIIINISTNATIVS DINsCTIVS (061Wa1440
filiFEfiENCB
TITLEr NUMIi911;
COMPENSATORY TIME 06.0!
III. Civil Service Employees
Policies concerning oompersatory lime for Fire and Police Civil Service
employees are governed by Civil Service Statute 1269P.
Sections l through 9 of Article 1269P* outline the specific laws
concerning overtime of Civil Service employees,
Civil Service employees may be granted compensatory time at a rate of
one and one-half times the hours worked in lieu of paid overtime.
The Vernon's Civil Statutes, Article 1269P, is available for review in
the City of Denton Public Library and the departments of Fire and
Personnel/Employee Relations,
02618
7/3/'34
WY OF DENTON
POLICY/ADMIXIISTRATIVX PROCRDIVIVADMINISTRATIV; DIRX17TIVS
' pE~sn~NCe
5ECT ION Numa l
PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 106,04
SU&JECT: EFFECTIVE OATS:
WAGE AND SALARY PLAN 7-17-84
TIT L&: REPLACES:
OVERTIME 3.7
POLICY STATEMENT:
The City of Denton requires employees to work overtime when neosseary and as
requested by the supervisor. Overtime is defined as authorized time worked by
employees which exceeds their officially scheduled time and/or approved paid
leave during an eighty (80) hour pay period. Overtime on any jor ahsll be
allocated as evenly as possible among all employees qualified to do the job,
The Personnel Director is responsible for maintaining the exempt/non-exempt
status of all city positions,
Supervisors shall make every effort to schedule overtime as far in advance as
possible. Supervisors shall be held responsible for ensuring that overtime is
assigned only when absolutely necessary.
E~t/Non-Fxempt Status
A. Non-oxempt employees are classified under the following ,tub
families: servioe/maintenance, office/clerical, and
technical/pare-professional.
B. Exempt employees are classified under the following job families:
management/supervision, professional, and executive.
0. Employees in job family M/1-3 will convert to non-exempt status for
emergency overtime situations only.
Overtime Pay
A. Non-exempt employees will be paid at the rate of one ani one-half
times their regular rate of pay for authorized overtime. Overtime
will be paid for all additional time worked to the nearest quarter
hour.
B. Permanent part-time employees will not recnive overtime pay until
the number of hours actually worked exceeds an eighty (80) hour pay
period.
C. Seasonal and temporary employees are not eligible for overtime pay.
RsfeRSNCe
TITLM NUMOM
OVERTIME IiMoO4
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURBI
A. Prior to working any overtime, employees roust check with their
supervisor to make sure overtime is or will be authorized.
B. Work periurmed by an employee other than normal working hours will
not be considered payable overtime unless authorized by the
supervisor. For examples work during meal times, after normal
working hours, or work taken home.
C. Exempt employees in job family M/1-3 will receive paid overtime at a
rate of one and one-half times their regular rate of pay only in
emergency situations.
An emergency situation is defined as a disruption or lose of an
essential earvioe that relates to water, elsotri.oity, health or
safety.
CIVIL SERVICE
Sections 1 through 9 of Article 1269P (hours of labor and vacations of
firemen and policemen in certain cities) outlines the specific laws
concerning overtime of Civil Service employees.
Vernon's Civil Statutes, Article 1269P, is available for review at the
City of Denton Public Library and the departments of Fire, Police, and
Personnel/Employee Relations.
02588
7/3/84
,44TY OF DENT, ON PAGl.,.LoF..L 4
P01.i0T/ADX1X:3?%ATIV% PROCXDURX/ADMIN18TRATIV2 DIRSOTIVI
RSPRRfiNCa
SECTION: NUMBRAj
PEr3ONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 111.06
EFFECTIVE CAM
SUBJECT: 7-17-84
APPROVED LEAVE
HQPIACES:
TITU: DEATH IN THE FAMILY LEAVE
4.G
POLICY STATEMENT:
It is the policy of the City of Denton to grant a maximum of three days leave
to employees in cases of death of family members, Uses of this leave may
include making funeral arrangements and attending funeral services including
travel time. The following family members are considered family memberst
Immediate Family Other Family
Husband Father-in-law Uncle
Wife Mother-in-law Aunt
Son Brother-in-law Nephew
Daughter Sister-in-law Niece
Mother Son-in-law Grandfather-in-law
Father Daughter-in-law Grandmother-in-law
Brothers Grandparents
Sisters Grand Children
Step and Foster Children
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURESt
1. For each instance of death in the immediate family all permanent
full-time employees may be granted leave by the immediate supervisor,
not to exceed three (3) paid calendar days. The three-day length is at
the option of the supervisor; it is not automatic. It is assumed that
one day is needed to attend funeral services, however two to three
calendar days may be necessary if travel is involved.
One day of paid leave may be granted to attend funeral services for
relatives other than immediate family.
II. Part-time employees may be granted up to three days without pay for
each instance involving immediate family, and one day of non-paid leave
for services of relatives other than immediate family.
III. All employees may be granted up to two hours of paid leave to attend
the funeral services for felloti: employees when the services occur
during scheduled work hours. Employee leave for such attendance is
conditional upon supervisor approval, work load, and need of the City.
POLIMADMINISTIATIVS PROCSOUR X/ADMINTaTRATM MIXOTIVE (Comitans4)
" a~AeRaNC~
TITLE: NUh4p8gr
DEATH IN THE FAMILY LEAVE 111,Ob
IV, Employees may request compensatory time, vacation time, or leave of
absence without pay for funerals of individuals not covered in the
policy statement,
025bg
7/3/84
CITY OF DENTON ►~atl.a.cf.J~
POLICYIADMINIOTIATIVX PX0CZDVAX/ADMINI9TXATIVx DIXXCTIVX
secr *N: NUMNtl NUMNI :
R:
PERSONNEL/EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 107.03
EFF66TIVH OATH:
SU 8J a CT:
YAOX AND SALARY PLAN 7_17_84
RHPIACIS:
Time:
VACATION/BONUS TIME 4.4
POLICY STATEMENTi
It is the policy of the City of Denton to provide vacation pay and hours to
all permanent employees who have completed six full months of employment.
Vacation hours for eligible employees are accrued on a monthly basis. Pay in
lieu of taking vacation is not permitted except upon termination.
The City of Denton also awards bonus time to employees who have given five
years of full-time service to the City, The amount of bonus time is not
related to an employee's shift or hours per week. Bonus time is given in
addition to regular vacation. Upon completion of five years of continuous
service, each permanent employee shall accrue four hours of bonus time for
each year of continuous service beginning on the anniversary date of
completion of the fifth year of service and continuing until permanent
full-time service with the City has ended. Pay in lieu of taking bonus time
is not permitted Qxoept upon termination.
An employee is not eligible to receive or use vacation hours until he or she
has completed six full months of permanent employment.
Vacation hours may not be used in advance of the hours being accrued.
Vacation for non-Civil Service employees is accrued at the rate of eight hours
for each month of continuous service.
Accrual rates for Civil Service employees are covered in Article 1269, V.A.T,S.
Maximum Carry-Over
The maximum allowed carry-over of vacation and bonus time is three hundred and
twenty (320) hours per calendar year (January through December) for all
non-Civil Service employees and Police Civil Service employees. Fire Civil
Service employees shall be allowed 480 houru per calendar year. An employee
may accrue as many hours of vacation as possible throughout the year; however,
it is the employee's responsibility to ensure that the maximum allowable hours
do not ijx1v:*id beyond a calendar yehr.
Permanent Part-Time Employees (Includes 112 and 3/4 time workers)
Employees who work 20 hours per week or more shall be entitled to vacation at
a rato equivalent to the budgeted pay classification of either 112 or 3/4
time. These employees will not accrue bonus time.
i
FAG12QF...3,
1POLIOT/ADki11IXTXATIVX PXOCkDU1WAAKIN1STXATIVX DIXXCTIVX (0ea61%we4)
TIT LS; RIFIRONCB
VACATION/BONUS TIMM
Mmployees holding more than one part-time position may not accrue more
vacation hours per month than a full-time employee, (See Part-Time Policy
#106.08).
Seasonal and Temporary Employees
Temporary and seasonal employees shall not earn or accrue vaoation/bonus time
or be entitled to vaoation/bonue time pay upon separation,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURESi
I. Accrual
The first full month will be determined by the date of permanent
amplovaent.
When an employee begins service before the 16th day of the month, that
month will be considered a full month. When an employee begins service
after the 15th day of the month, the first full month will not be
completed until the close of the next calendar month.
EXAMPLE:
Employment Dater May 1.2th
First full month completed end of May,
Employment Dater May 20th
First full month completed end of June.
Upon completion of six full months (as defined above), forty-eight (48)
hours vacation will be credited to the non-civil service employee's
account (earning 8 hours per month).
After completion of six full months, the vacation hours accrued in a
subsequent month are not available for the employee to use until the
first day of the following month,
II, Scheduling
A. The designated supervisor must approve all vacation and bonus time,
giving due consideration to the moods of the service and the ability
of the remaining staff to perform the work of the department or
division. If taking more than one day of approved time, an employee
must make the request at least three (3) working days in advance.
B. A supervisor may approve one day or less of vacation or bonus time
provided:
, Y
POLIO TIADMINIST1RATIVA PROOSDURVADIIINISTIATWX Dl]kXCTIV# 10ontimss4}
RRuWMg4NCI
TITlar VACATION/BOVSIS TIME
1. The employee makes his request prior to the start of the
affected work shift,
2. The reason for the request is reasonable and of an emergency
nature, and does not create an undue hardship on the division.
0. Vaoation/bonus time may be taker, in minimum intervals of one hour.
D. The maximum amount of continuous bonus and/or vacation time which
can be granted to an employee at one time is four calendar weeks,
unless approved otherwise by the department director.
O26jg
7/3/84
(:kkI MCAll: UF- AUTHENTICITY
f
i
THIS I$ TO CIPTIFY Thal Iho rnlaophnl~yraphc appoarlnp on this FIIM•FII*
>tilorliny wfih CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET 08 10711984 and
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
lndlnq with _ .__arn
accurole and tomplats mprodutllons a( She rowds of (Company and Aopl,) CITY DENTON
CITY SECRETARY
.as dollw►rd In this ►.yular caurso of
buslnsss lot photographing,
h Is Purthor corllflod That the mlugphol~pt►sphlt protessos warn accompllthod In
a manna and on Alm whlth mools with filul►1monlt of Ihr Nallonal bum", of itandanis
fsr pamanonl mlc►ophol"lopl14 copy,
f-
i
ji+ ;_ldlGln • Rocor s Comp4L.
ILw1At TfCNl101o01 AY I*PK '
Pl.ACE_►~,_Stn iW t~PArk Rey $14ts
►rllnoinn Tome Win