Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09-04-13-1984
i EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL Septe:aber 131 1984 i Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Thursday, September 13, 1984, at 5:00 p.m. In the Civil Defonse Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be oonsidere6: 5:00 P.M. 11 Work Session on the proposed 1984-85 budget. 21 Executive Session: A. Legal Hatters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.r,5. B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S, D. Board appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the / day of 1984 at_ o'clock ' Y``~- 1497C EMERGENCY ADDENDUM CITY OF DENTON UITY COUNCIL September 13, 1984 Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Thursday, September 13, 1984, at 5:00 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 5;00 P.M. 1. Work Session on the proposer) 1984-85 budget, 2. Executive Session; A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T E ! I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1984 at o'clock 1497C A,rENUA CA'ry OF 00 TON Cif Y COUNCIL Septemuer la, 1984 Special Cailed Heeting of the City of Uenton uity Council on Thursday, Septemuer 13, 1984, at /:3U p,m, in the Council unamuers of the Municipal building at wnicn the following items will oe cunsidered; 7;30 p.m, Puolic Hearing on the FY 1984-85 proposed tax increase, 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec, tte), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 6. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. L, Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 5252-17 V.A.T.S. U. Board Appiintments Under Sec. 2(gArt 627[-1/ V.A.T.G. C E R r 1 F i C A 'f E i certiry tnat tale aoove notice of meeting was posted on the oulletin uuard at the uity Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1184 at.; u c1ock (a.m.) A ~ z z GI . 1486G/2 ~ i Auk11DA CITY OF DENTON UiTY CUUNCIL Septemuer 1y, 1984 Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on T,-iursday, Septemuer 13, 1984, at 7:3U p.m, in the Council unamuers of the Municipal building at which the following items will oe considered: 7:30 P.M. NUUliC Hearing on the FY 1984-89 proposed tax increase. 2. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), P*%. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. G, Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V,A.T.S U. board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art i527L-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T I F I C A T E i certify that tn° auove notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the _ day of 1984 dt - o'clock 146602 AUENUA ~;iTY OF 00WN UiiY UOUNCIL September 1~, 15'a4 Work Session of the 4ity of Denton Uity Council on Wednesday, September 11, 064, at !);UU p,m, in the Uivil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at wnion the following items will be considered; 5;UO P.M. Work Session on the proposed 15'84-85 oudget, 2, Executive Session; A. Legal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art, 6271-17 V,A,i,S, B. meal Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V,A.f,S. 1, Personnel Under Sec, 'L(g), Art 05252-17 V.A.'T,S, U. RodL,d Appuintments Under Sec, t(g), Art bL7L-11 V.A,f.S. U E R T I F 1 C A T E I certify tnat the aoove notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin uuard at the City Hall of the pity of Denton, Texas, un the _ ll'"A- day of , 15'84 at nlclocx la.m.) (p.m,) J J~ U Sty 1+8oU/ 1 AUENUA UtTY OF DENTON C11'Y COUNCIL September 12, 1954 Work Session of toe Uity of ounU;n City Council on Wednesday, September 12, 15+84, at 5;U0 p,m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal t3uilding at wnicn the following items will be considered; 5;00 P.M. 1, Work Session on the proposed 1984-85 budget. 2, Executive Session; A. Legal. Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A. f. i, a. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A,T.S. G. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V,A,T.S. 0. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 62y2-I7 V.A.F.S. C E R T I F 1 C A E I certify tnat the aoove notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1`•984 at o'clocK ta.m.1 7 p;m,.j__ lN86C/ 1 AGENDA CI'T'Y OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL f September 4, 1984 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday September 4, 1984, at 5;30 p.m. In the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following Items will be considered: 5:30 P.M. 1. Discussion on funding of Flow Hospital. 2. Discussion of a proposed 112.7 acre mobile home subdivision in the extra territorial Jurisdiction (ap roximately 9700 feet east of Loop 288 on Highway 4M for the purpose of determining whether or not to begin the annexation process. 3. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 6252-17 B. Real bstate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 625.9-17 V.A.T,S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on 'T'uesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 1, 1984; Regular Meeting of May 22, 1984; Regular Meeting of June 5, 1984; Special Called Meeting of June 8, 1984; and the Regular Meeting of June 19, 1984. 2. Consent Agenda: Bach of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereon will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Stafr recommendations. i City of Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 1984 Page Two A. Bids and Purchase Orders; 1. Bid N 9315 - Bentonite slurry cutoff wall 2. Bid N 9318 - Traffic poles, signal lights, etc. 3. Bid N 9319 - Meter maintenance 4. Bid N 9320 - Hydraulic auger 5. Bid k 9321 - Padlocks 6, Bid N 9322 - infrared viewer 7, Bid N 9324 - Vacuum pump 8. Bid N 9325 - Soft drinks and vending machines 9. Bid N 931.6 - Sale of transformer - damaged in fire ' 10. Bid N 9327 - Transformer ratiometer 11. Bid N 9329 - Janitorial services 120. Bid N 9331 - Utility poles 13. Purchase Order N 63913 to General Electric Company, Apparatus Service Division in the amount of $13,111.63, 14. Purchase Order N 64685 to Denton Electric Shop, Inc, in the amount of $3,583.26. .5. Purchase Order N 64726 to Newman Engineering Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $3,512.17. 16. Purchase Order N 647S3 to ONhAC Cor;)oration in the amount of $4,143.00. B. Contracts. 1. Consider approval of a contract with Padgett-Thompson for presentation of seminar regarding the legal aspects of hiring and firing, seminar to be given to all City supervisory personnel. Cost will be approximately ,$6,000 depending upon number of partic.ipantss. City of Denton City' 6uncil Agenda September 4, 1984 Page Three C. Plats and Replatsl 1. Consider approval of the final repllat of lot 29, section II, of the Solar Way Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 2 Consider approval of the preliminary and final replat of the Krause Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 3. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Frame Street Add it,ioil, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Jay-Mar Addition, (The Plantti.ng and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) S. Consider approval of the preliminary replat of the Westridge Addition. (Tile Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) V. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of block 1 of the Woodcreek Addition. (The 111annirig and 'Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 7. Consider aapproval of a site plan for unit 2, block 2, of the Fallmeadow Addition (PD-8). (The Planniog and Zoning Comlaissioll recommends approval.) 81 Consider approval of the final replat of the Denton Ratirement Center Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Appearance by representatives of Young People in Action to express appreciation to the City Council for their support. 4. Public Hoarings: A. Z-102. This is the petition of Curtis D, Hodgson, representing RWGP, Inc., requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 66.S acre tract located at the southwest corner of Paige Rd. and Swisher Rd. if approved, the planned development wi11 permit a 413 lot manufactured Housing subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 1984 Page Four I. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 66.5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Paige Road and Swisher Road. B. Z-1674. 'T'his Is the petition of Jo Storer requesting an amendment to planned development (PD-6) on a S8,2 acre tract located on the south side of Colorado Boulevard approximately 1,510 feet northwest of Loop 288. If approved, the PD amendment will permit the following Land uses; Single family detached - 22 lots on 3.8 acres (typical lot size 1201x451) Single family detached - 106 lots on 34.1 acres (typical lot size 120'x801) Cluster Housing - 215 units on 18 acres (12 units per acre) Two family - 16 units on 2.3 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Z-1682. This is the petition of Jo Storer r©~juesting a change in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and 811-16) zoning classifications to the planned development (PD) classification on a 83.'2 acre tract located on the east and west sides of Lillian Miller Parkway (Ridgeway Drive) beginning approximately 1,000 feet south of Interstate Highway 351:. If approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses: 38.2 acres of single family (SF-10) detached land use (105 lots with a density of 2.7 units per acre) 18.0 acres of single family (SF-16) detached land use (32 lots with a density of 1.8 units per acre) 17.6 acres of single family detached land use (106 units with a density of 6 units per acre) 9.4 acres of single family attached land use (40 units with a density of 4.3 units per acre) i•c l,,,nning and Coning Commission recommends al-pp v~i I 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the SF-10 and SF-16 classification to the Planned Development City of Denton City Council Agenda September 40 1984 Page Five (PD) classification on a 83,Z acre tract located on the east and crest sides of Lillian Miller Parkway beginning approximately 1000 feet south of 1.3513, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) D. Public hearing regarding the use of Federal Reven,ie funds for the f iscal year 1984-85. L. Public hearing on the fiscal year 1984-85 budget, 5. Ordinancos; A. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a a change in zoning from planned development (PD-19) and single family (SF-10) to a revised planned development classification on 161.7 acres beginning at the intersection of Teasley Lane and Lillian Milier Parkway (Ridgeway Drive), (Z-1660). ll, Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Appendix A to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, known and cited as the Denton Development Code, by amending Article fill Cliapter IV, Article 4,16, Paragraph (A) relating to lot size, width and depth requirements for proposed subdivisions and declaring an effective date. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 31,335 acre:5 of land located on the east side of FM 2164 (North Locust Street) and west of the Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park (A-5) (7'lre Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval.) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance adopting the 1982 Uniform Fire Cole and Amendments; to provide for fire safety inspections of buildings, fire extinguishing, sprinkler and standpipe systems, and flammable storage facilities; providing for inspection and permit. fees and repealing all ordinances in conflict, h Consider an ordinance abandon irig an easement, Greater Denton Arts Council, et al tract. Cityy ok Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 1984 Page Six 64 Resolutions,, A. Consider adoption of a resolution establishing a Minority Business linterprise Program for the Denton Municipal Airport, (The Airport Advisory Hoard will meet on August 31.) B. Consider adoption of a resolution to readopt the 1984 update to the Denton Development Guide. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 7. Consider approval of tentative award of Hid N 9238 for improvements at the Denton Municipal Airport, ('Fite Airport Advisory Board will meet on August 31,) 8. Consider taking a record vote on tine proposed tax increase for fiscal year 1984-85. 9. Consider removing zoning case 2-L677. 10. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the single family (SF-7) and agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 52 acre itract located at the northwest cornor of Lattimore Street and Audra Lane, ('Cite Public Utilities Hoard recommends approval.) ll. Consider approval of proposed authorization to perf+:rra professional services for design of approximately 7000' sanitary sowerline in conjunction with John Pass Investments from property on Dallas Drive to Pecan Creek/Woodrow Lane twin outfall interceptors, (The Public Utilities Hoard recommends approval,) 12, Consider approval of an agreement for sanitary pro rata participation for Hickory Creek Limited and the City of Denton to serve a 61 acre mobile home park on South Teasley Lane, ('rhe Public Utilities Hoard recommends approval.) 13. Consider approval of an oversizing agreement for Loop 288 Plaza Joint Venture. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 14. Official Action on Executive Session Items, A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel 1). Board Appointments 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 19V< Page Seven 15, New Business, 'this itom pravides a section for Council Members to suggest ite!ns for future agendas. C G R T i F I C A 'r H I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, i on the day of , 1.984 at o'clock (a.m.) CITY SECRETARY 1477C MyOfDffifrOV, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN70N, TEXAS 7vi«01 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ANNEXATION REVIEW OF DENTON COUNTY NORTH/SOUTH ADDITION (MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION) Preliminary plats have been filed with the Planning and Commu- nity Development Department by Homecraft Enterprises, Inc, who are proposing to buil6 two mobile home subdivisions on F.M. 426 (East McKinney Street), approximately 9700 feet east of Loop 288. The proposals include Denton County North, 64.5 acres (325 lots) west of the existing vacation Village Estates; and Denton County South, 48.2 acres (266 lots) southwest of Vaca- tion Village. Due to the size of the proposed development, staff has reviewed the proposal for the purpose of considering annexation. A major conclusion of the study was that unless the city is going to deny this type of land use (zoning), the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations will control most urban develop- ment questions and therefore the impact on the City would be the same whether or not the area is annexed, However, there were some other concerns noted; 1. There is a slight possibility of substandard building if it is not annexed. 2. The proposed lots are less than 7,000 square feet. 3. There will be a need to annex a 500 foot wide strip along F.M. 426 to connect to the existing city limits (approximately 4,800 feet). An ordinance amending Article 4.16, Paragraph (A) of the Subdivision and Land Use Regulations relating to lot size, width and depth is being recommended for approval to the City Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff feels that if this ordinance is approved a major concern will be aleviated. Annexation Review Page Two gtudy Conolpsion: Due to the size of this proposal it is a strong candidate for annexation. The :gain question is with zoning and building codes, and how strong they should be considered. If the land use is objectionable to the point it might be denied, staff recommends that you consider possible annexation. If the land use is not objectionable, then the annexation cost would appear to outweigh the benefits since we have substantial development control through the Subdivision and Land Use Regulations. Staff recommends a continued close monitoring of this area, and if development appears to be proceeding contrary to the City zoning standards or building codes we would then recommend annexation in order to exercise these controls, however, at this time, staff cannot strongly recommend annexation because of good control through the Subdivisions and Land Use Regulations. The Annexation Study checklist is attached. 0 Steve Fanning August 29, 1984 0784a CITY OF DORTON mm, PLANNING AND COMNMITY DIVOLOPMItNT DBVAXTlCtlix' A . it AreA is annexed ANN1lXATION CHEMIST X " If Am is not WWOK04 1 IMPACT OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION ON CITY OF DENTON ISSUE I ANNEXATION ISSUE STATEMENT { I 1 { COMMENTS NUMMER ! MINIMUM CRITERIA I 9 1 1 1 I I I I I € 1! 1 1 1 1! 1 A. ! Ability of the City to Furnish } { I A I I X f I I City services are presently at oapaa.5t,y. Normal Urban services I I I ! ! I I I Additional demand would causo addit ;Dual I I I I 1 I I I I strain. B. I The Reliability, Capaelty, and I I I I A I I I I Subdivision requirements would be t w Future public cost for community I I ! ! ! { I 1 same whether or not the area is I facilities, i.e, roads, utilities,! I I I X I I I I annexed, I etc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C. I The need and quality of land use ! I I X I I A ! { I Unless the City is going to deny th:r 1 and building controls. { I I I I { I I land use (zoning) the Subdivision I I I ! ! 1 I I Regulations will control most urban I ! I I { development questions, impact woul ; be I I I I I I I I I the same whether or not area is wmmued. D. I Current and Long Range impact on: I I I I I { I I I I I I I I I I I { 1. Fiscal Cost and Benefits I I I A I I X I ! ( The fiscal cost may outweigh fiscal I I I I I I I ! I benefits. I I I I I I I I I 1 2. Traffic f I IA/X I I I I Impact the same whether oi., not annwared. I I I I I I I I I 3. Infrastructure I I I IA/X I I I I Impact the same whether or not annwwe+d. I 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 14. Safety or Health I I I IA/X I I I I Impact the same whether or not anna:ued. ! 1 1 1 1 1 1{! 1 5. Building/Development Quality I I I X ! I A I I I There is a slight possibility of sua, I I I I I I I I { standard building. t I I I I I I I I 1 6. Aesthetic Quality ! I I !A/X I I I I Impact the same whether or not anne:red. 1 7. Community Character I I I IA/X I I I I Impact the same whether or not annmued. I ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B. ( Conformity To Master Plans 1 I I IA/X I I I I Impact the same whether or not unnamed. w~ coop zaa Grp llAilr5 TWO r . ~ f / V1r11VITY ;VA1F y3~ i Den+ar+ Ccun+y Subdivision Su:ih Denton Cckn+'y Subdw~sion ~orlr r" A „ City council minutes . May 1, 1984 The Council convened into a work session at 500 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room, MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Steward Mayor Pro Tom Chewi CouuciI Members Alford, Chow, McAdama, Riddlespergor and Stephens City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ASSENTi Council Member Hopkins was absent to to illnesi 1, The Council considered the emergency agenda addendum discussion of the commercial fire inspection fee program, Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that he sad requested that this item 1:e placed on the agenelk as he had a problem with the letter from the Eire Marshal delineating fees for commercial fire inspections. The letter stated that this was an annual charge based on the square footage in the building. Chow stated :hat an individual office in a complex was not a building. City Manager Chris Hartung responded that this was an annual fee which was based on occupancy of the building. The goal wag to check the usage of the premises by the occupants, Any confusion in the intent of the inspection should be corrected, This program was approved during the budget process and projections of revenues had been based on these foes, if the program was was altered, a reassessment would need to be done cf fire inspection staffing. • Eire Chief Jack Gentry reported that the consultants had recommended a charge of $44 based on the actual cost of the service, The Fire Department staff had reeommendjad that the fee be charged on the basis of square footage in the office to keep small businessmen Eros paying the same as large industries, Mayor Stewart asked about the procedures followed during thit inspections. Gentry responded that the Inspector introduced himself and gave a copy of the letter stating the charges to the businessman. If tht businessman refused the inspection, the Fire Department personnel left. Council Member Riddlesperger asked what Was the charge fc: Inspection of individual offices in office complex buildings. Gentry replied that any square footage of 6,000 or Less was charged $15,00. The charge was per office and not per building. Council Member Stephens asked if the inspection reports were forwarded to the State Insurance board, Gentry responded that a report was sent of the total n+,mber of inspection completed but not a list of the buildings inspected, Council Member McAdams stated that the building was inspected at th-2 time a.f construction, After that, each business would ce responsible for the space which they occupied, Mayot Pro Tem Chew stated that he had lease space in the same building for two years and no inspection had been done until the fe,e was imposed. City Manager Hartung responded that until the fee wan approved raise the revenues necessary to pay :or the cost of tiervice, adequate staff was not available to perform the Inspections, City of Penton City Council Minutes Meeting of may 1, 1984 Page Two Mayor 'Pro Tom chow asked if the landlord (owner of the tvailding) would 'be charged for the inspection of the stairs or slevaaors and fire hosee as well as charging the individual occupants too. Mayor Stewart stated that individual office occupants could bring space beaters or other such fire hazards into their office and the landlord would not know it. ,Mayor Pro Tom Chew asked if all the occupants were going to be charged and the landlord also, Mayor Stewart stated that he believed the letter explaining the service and the charges should be reworded, City Attorney C. .3. Taylor stated that the letter should be written so as to reflect the wording of the fire code ordinance. The consensus of the Council was to have the legal staff review the ordinance and the wording of the letter and bring the item back to the Council on the May 22 agenda. 2. The Council held a discussion on the proposed mobile home and travel trailer ordinance. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, displayed a map of the city showing the locations of proposed mobile home parks, Council Member Stephens asked if 41 feet collector streets within the mobile home parki were be necessary. Watkins responded that interior streets were to be 34 feet wide, Council Member Stephens stated that he hated to see this issue stay in limbo and felt it would be appropriate to discuss those areas of the proposed ordinance which were problems Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated that Council Member Hopkins had several questions regarding the legality of the ordinance. Mr, Marc alova, Vice-President and Treasurer of Champion Homes, stated that the basic issues as far as his company was concerned revolved around the width of the interior streets and the lot sizes, The manufactured housing industry had changed into an alternate form of housing for many people. In the past 5 years, manufactured housing had provided 35% of the housing in the United States. Champion Homes was geared around affordability for prospective homeowners. The proposed development by Champion would not represent a subdivision and felt the subdivision rules and regulations on street width would be too stringent as mobile home parks had lees traffic than most traditional subdivisions, Mayor Stewart asked if a 34 feet street would be wide enough to move a mobile home In and out of the park, Mr. Tom Kellogg, engineer for Champion Homes, stated that when. moving a home in the moving company could run up over the curb and onto another lot, Most mobile homes, approximately 911, are moved into a park, tied down and are not moved again as the cost of moving was quite expensive. The interior streets should be designed tr handle vehicular traffic with no "outside" traffic other thdr, service or delivery trucks. In the proposed Champion development, there would be no on-street parking with two car parking spaces and quest parking provided. Mayor Stewart asked about space to leave boats, ctc. Mr. Kellogg responded that apace had beer, provided in the propose.i development for campers, boats, etc. city of Denton city council Minutes Meeting may 1, 1984 Page Three e council Member Riddlesperger stated that he did not ses how the traffic in a subdivision oould be greater than that in a mobile home park due to the density of housing in most parks. Me, Kellogg replied that typieall , the greeter traffic was in the more traditional type housing subdivisions. Council Member Mckdams stated that since manufactured housing units were getting larger, if the lot size were reduced the park would appear to be more crowded, Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that the proposed regulation specified that the lot size should be 5,000 feet, There were appropriate lot size specifications based on square footage of the housing units. Council Member McAdams stated that if the lots were made large enough in the beginning, staff would not have to continue to check to see if larger units had been moved onto the lots, Mr. Kellogg replied that this problem could be controlled through the issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy. Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he could not see any cost difference In a 4,500 and 5,000 lot. Me, Kellogg responded that Champion Homes felt the requirement for 5,000 lot was too much and would affect flexibility of design. Me, R. J. Button, owner of Lakewood Estates Mobile Rome Park, stated that 41 feet collector streets in the parks would defeat the purpose . of the streets to move and traffic as they would be turned into parking lots by the residents and guests. Charlie Watkins reported that collector streets collected the traffic from residential streets and fed into arterials which moved traffic across town. The recommendation for 41 feet wide streets inside mobile home parks might be excessive, Council Member Stephens how the staff had arrived at the recommendation for 41 feat streets inside the parks, Watkins responded that 34 feet wide streets had been discuused for the park interior and the staff had assumed these streets would feed into collector streets. Council Member McAdams asked if the need for collector streets could be taken care of during the platting process. The 31 feet wide streets were the minimum, if a site plan required wider streets, could they be required. Watkins replied yes. Mr, Curtis Hodgson, developer of the proposed Rolling Wood Estates mobile home park, stated that he had forwarded a letter to the Council Members listing problems that he had with the proposed ordinance. The first problem was that mobile home parks were often confused as being of a high density. The proposed ordinance as written would mean that 188 of the land would have homes and the other 828 would be green space or streets. Me, Hodgson further stated that he had paid two and one-half times as much for his property than Mr. Button had paid for his land In Denton. Mr. Hodgson anticipated a need for less than 5,000 square feet lots tc r+coup his Investment in the land. Mr. Hodgson also stated that the proposed ordinance was 1708 more rigid on street width requirements that the requirements for apartments. Interior streets in mobile home parks were not open City of Denton City Counoll Minutes Meeting of May 1, 1984 Page Four streets for ,publio use, The current ordinance specified a 60 feet radius for oul-d•-sacs while the current single family ordinance specified a 40 feet radius, The third area of concern was the requirement for fire hydrants at 200 teat intervals in mobile home perks while the requirement for duplexes was 600 test intervals. Council Member Stephens asked Mr. Hodgson why he was interested in building A mobile home park in Denton, Mr, Hodgson replied he liked the texture of the land. Council Member McAdams asked why the staff had recommended a 60 feet cul-de-sac, Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, replied thin was the requirement in the subdivision rules and regulations to provide adequats room for fire and solid agate vehicles to ':urn around, Council Member Stephens asked it new mobile homes moved into existing parks would have to meet the requirements and standards of the proposed ordinance. Assistant City Manager Rick Svshla responded that these mobile homes were inspected to insure that the units met codes. City Attorney C. J, Taylor stated that the standards would not change and the units would have to meet electrical, fire, plumbing, etc. codes. e Charlie Watkins also reported that there would be an annual license renewal for the mobile home parks and an inspection would e performed by the building inspector, Mayor Stewart stated that he would like to stay with the 5,000 feet lot size and the 34 feet minimum street width, The Council might also want to consider limited existing mobile home parks on what they could put in in the future and also to address the problem of location of future parks, A method should be devised to limit mobile home parks in one area of town to insure a fair distribution of various types of housing. Another concern was the impact of a large influx of mobile home parks on the city's utility system. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No official action was taken. The Council then convened into the regular meeting at 7,00 p.m, in the Council Chambers. DtEMBERS PRESENT, Mayor Stewart., Mayor Pro Tem Chews Council Members Alford, Chew, McAdams, Riddleeperger and Stephens City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ASSE,vTi Council Member Hopkins was absent to to illness The Mayor presented a Proclamation for National Volunteer Week which was accepted by Mr, tlary Truitt. . The Mayor presented a Proclamation for National Fitness Testing week for May 6 through 12, 1984. City of Denton Ott Meetin yy Cc$ unvii Minutss g of May 1, 198 Page F'lv 1. Consent Agenda Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, Motion carried unanimously, Consent Agendai A, Bids and Purchase Orders 1. Bid # 9265 - 40 feet by 70 feet shed 2. Bid # 9267 - One vent turbine pump/motor controller 3, Bid # 9270 - Loader/backhoe 4. Bid # 9271 - Door and partition 5, Bid # 9272 - Open top containers 6, Bid 1 9214 - Capacitors and racks 7, Bid # 9275 - Zeta Meter System 30 8, Bid # 9276 - 8-channel dual trans record/ reproduction 9, Bid # 9277 - Brass pipe fittings 10. Bid t 9278 - Epson computer printers w/cables 11. Bid # 9280 - Crack sealant B. Purchase Ordersi 1, Purchase order # 62962 to North Texas State University in the amount of $21, 315.24. G. Plats and Replatsi 1, Approval of the prelim Leary plat of lot 1, block of the Neblett Addition, (The Planning and Zoo ng Commission recommends approval.) 2, Approva; of the preliminary plat of the Hopkins Hills Addition, Section 11, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 3. Approval of the preliminary and final replats of lot 7R of the Cool Crest Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval) 4. Approval of the preliminary and final replats of lots 18 and 19, block. E, Kingston Trace Subdivision, Section il. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Approval of the preliminary and final replata of lots IA and 1B, block 3, of the North Horizons Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 6. Approval of the preliminary and final replats of lots 25A and 256, block 2, North Horizons Subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) M 7, Approval of the preliminary replat of the wolski Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of May 1, 1984 Page SIX 8, Approval of the preliminary %rrl final replats of lots l+B, block Wks of The 'village, Phase IV. (The Planning and Zoning Commission rec.,)mmends approval,) 9, Approval of the preliminary plat of the Paisley Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recr,mmends approval.) D, Tax Rs.undl 1. Consider approval of a tax refund to Savings of AmErica in the amount of 5521,16. The representatives of the Mayhtll community requesting to appear before the Council regarding water issues were not present. 3, Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amendment requiring garagekeepers insurances coverage relating to tow service. This item was withdrawn from the agenda by staff 8. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hoaringa on the proposed annexation of approximately 81,44 acres of land beginning at Swisher/Shiloh Road. A-1 Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that the next three items on the agenda had been approved by the Council at the April 17 meeting, However, due to a scheduling problem with the Council meeting of May 15, the dates of the public hearings would have to be changed. Staff was recommending the first public hearing be held on May 22 and the second public hearing held on June 5, The following ordinance was presentedi N0. 84-52 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. McAdams motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings on the proposed annexation of approximately 20 ;acres of land beginning at Swisher Road. A-2 Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that staff was recommending the first public hearing be held on May 22 and the second public hearing hold on June 5, The following ordinance was preaenteds N0, 84-53 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DA'"E, TIME AND PLACE Ot THE PROPOSED . ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY nY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of May 1, 1484 . Page Seven Chow motion, Stephens second that the ordinance 'A adopted, On roll call Vote, MOAdAms "aye,° Stephens "ay U," Alford uaye,u Riddlesperger aye, Chew aye, and Mayor Stewart. aye. Motion carried unanimously. D, The Council considered adoption o; an ordinance setting a date, time and pla7s for public hearings on the proposed annexation of approximately 522,76 acres of land beginning 750 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of U, S. Highway 380, A-3 Chavlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that staff was recommending the first public hearing be held on May 22 and the second public hearing held on June S. The following ordinance was presented, NO. 84-54 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION 01' CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND ALTHORIZINQ AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, McAdams motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddleoperger "aye," Chew and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance, appendix S, Articles 7M and 12A of the code of ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, by adding a new • use to the schedule of uses, permitting the mixing and sale of concrete in various zoning districts, by adding section 12A (65) defining and restricting the mixing and sale of concrete and declaring an effective date. David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that with the exception of Me. McAdams, the Council was familiar with the locat.on, operation and problem this ordinance would address. The intent was to allow individuals to purchase a small amount of concrete for small home projects. The staff had probleme determining what type of zoning should be in place for bu..iinoer,es which sold these small amounts of concrete, A batch plant wotild require a zoning classification of light industrials however, a business which sold small amounts was not a batch plant, A legal opinion had been received from the City Attorney's office and staff had surveyed manufacturers, other cities and the American Planning Association on this issue, Most experts felt that this was a purely commercial, use, Staff was recommending in the ordinance several standards for these mixer facilities. Zoning would ht:ve to be commercial and some type of fence or screening was requested. The following ordinancn was presentedi N0. 84-55 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, APPENDIX B. ARTICLES 7M AND 12A OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ADDING A hEW USE TO THE SCHEDULE OF USES, PERMITTING THE MIXING AND SALE OF CONCRETE: IN VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS) BY ADDING SECTION! 12A(65) DEFINING AND RESTRICTING THE MIXING AND SALE OF CONCRETE, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Riddlesperger motion, McAdams second that the ordinance be adopted. . On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. City of Denton City Ct : Minutes Meeting of May 1, 19n4 . Page Eight F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance abandoning An easement in the Denton Center - Phase IX Denton Center joint venture, Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the City did not have anything in this easement and the joint venture had dedicated another easement, Council Member Stephens stated that some items had been placed on this council agenda prior to the item being brought before the appropriate advisory board and/or commission for a recommendation, Stephens furthst stated that this would be appropriate in the case of an emergency item but was not sure these items were of an emergency nature. City Manager Hartung responded that if the Council wanted to make a hard and fast rule on this issue, the staff would strictly adhere to holding items until the next Council meeting after the appropriate board/commission had met to make a recommendation, Council Member McAdams stated that she did not see a problem with this issue as it was out and dried. Council member Stephens stated that it was a point of order, The following ordinance was presentedi NO. 84-56 AN ORDINANC' PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING THE . MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY IN SAID EASEMENT TO THE OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY SAID EASEMENT) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Stephen: motion, McAdams second that the ordinance be adopted, on roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 0. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 25 of the City of Denton Code of ordinances to require owners to furnish single phase electric meter boxes. Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that at the present time, the City Electric Department furnished metal containers to developers. The developers had chosen not to use type type of meter base. It was estimated that the adoption of this ordinance would save approximately $90,000 per year. The following ordinance was presentedi NO, 84-57 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 25 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, RELATING TO ELECTRIC SERVICE, TO REQUIRE OWNERS TO FURNISH SINGLE PHASE METER BASEST AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Riddlesperger motion„ Chew second that the ordinance be adopted, On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," St,3phens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance abandoning a portion of an existing utility easement in Mesquite Ridge Townhouses Addition. City of Denton City Council Minutes Msetinyy of May 1, 1984 • page Nin• Bob Nelson, Director place rand tnone w•reo plannedalor ht he lutur~nt had no city utilities in p The !allowing ordinance was presented! N0. 84-58 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF A TRACT OF LAND DEDICATED FOR UTILITY AND STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, OF THE OWNER THEITLEADJACENTAND OF LANDCIAND SAIDARINLAND AN EFFECTIVE DATE Alford motion, McAdams second that herdina ce beAltopted,ayeOn roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Stephens Motion Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." carried unanimously, 4, Resolutions A. The Council theconsidered approval intersection, resolution to Sall-Eagle purchase eight-of-way City Manager Hartung reported that this was a routine property acquisition. The following resolution was presented% 4 R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton finds it necessary to purchase a certain ra of land to aced in the City of Denton, Texas, and more fully described WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton swof the oplnicn that the best interest and welfare of he public served by the purchase of the parcel of real estate described belowi and WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Purchaser, and Ali A1-Khafaji, Owner, of said parcel, agree that a consid rats not f eucvedescri nd Dollars (55,000,00) is a fair and agreed value propertyi NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEYASi , SCCT1ON I The City Attorney is hereby authorized to prepare the necessary legal documents to complete the transfer fproperty so described below from the owner thereof to the City of Denton% Ali that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of an to , Shoe of Texa ,band part 759, and eing part of the William Loving Survey, of Lot Nos, 8 and 9, Block A, and part of Lot 9, Block B, of the act oft lands City and 'homastE, No 1 Blount Additio, offn a additin also being ng p par ction deed dated anci wife, Fama C. Noel to Ali A1-i<hafaji by corre January 19, 1981 and recorded n and Volume 056, Page 1 y5 of t e eed Records of Denton County, follows city of Denton City council minutes Meeting of May 1, 1994 Page Ten as HEOINHINO at the most easterly northeast id corner point of lying act at the described !n above mentioned deed, line with intersection of the present Hell Avenue west h5tz feti ay the present south right-of-way line of Wainwright east boundary tine THENCE south 29'44'42" west along said 'tract 5 S same being thS west right-of-way line of Bell Avenue a distance of 40.31 feet to a point for a corners . along said lines a distance of 50.60 THENCE a sopoint uth )744613211 for a cornecr THENCE south 44625'58" west along said lines a distance of 35.71 toot to a point for oorneri THENCE north 35033'12" east a distance of 41,66 feet to a point for a cornea THENCE north 29'44 ' 42" east a distance of 85,0 feet to a point for a corner in the north boundary line of said Tract 5 same being the south right-of-way line of Wainwright Stline7a distance of 12.0 feet THENCE south 5 alon said 0,0231 acre of land, more to the place o 9 or less. SECTION The City of Denton is hereby authorized to pay its share the necessary and reasonable cost of closing as required by the salon contract, 1984, PASSED AND APPROVED this the lot day of May, RC RD S W R, 0 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST, C A LE , T S C AR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS 1".) LEGAL FORM, C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY% Stephens motion, Riddlesperger second tha Stephensresolut'i"n be I Al approved. roll call votel " Chow d"ay ayeand Mayor Stewart ayford "aye, Riddl esperger "ayee,," Motion carried unanimously. resolution B. The Council considered approval of A until May 22. postponing the regular City Council meeting of may 15 Mayor Stewart tstated that and Coun iloutul the pitying an annual on May would be of planning The following resolution was presented, R E 5 0 L U T I 0 N rybothaout Of t. the t nec ewill HEA May a l5 majority , and th it Council of Denton on Council . mooting for such date be postponed until May 22, 19841 NOw, THEREFORE:, City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of May 1, 1984 Page Pleven BE IT PESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, SECTION I. That the regular Council meeting to be hold on May 151 1984 be postponed until May 22, 1984. PASSED AND APPROVED this the lot day of May, 1984. RICRARD 04 , CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO L80AL FORM, C, J, TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY1 McAdams motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 5, The Council considered approval of an engineering service contract with Freese and Nichols, inc., for the evaluation, preparation and plans and apeciflcationu, review of bidding documents and periodic on-site review for raw water pumping improvements (CIP Project 84-0-3), Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the Public Utility board had reviewed the contract and recommended approval. McAdams motion, Alford second to approve the engineering service contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc. Motion carried unanimously. 6. The Council considered approval of non-reaident fees for recreation programs, Steve Brinkman, Director Roicreation, fee philosophy to ads staff was recommending a restructuring of the a non-resident fee beginning with the fall sessions. The recommendation was to charge $3.00 to those patrons using city of Denton facilities who did not live within the city limits and pay taxes. Council Member Riddlesperger asked approximately how many non- residents participated in programs. Brinkman responded that the number varied from program to program. In some programs as many as 20% of the participants did not live within the city limita, in other programs, there were none. The sports programs already required a non-resident fee. Council Member McAdams asked if the city was already subsidizimj these programs. Brinkman responded yes because the fees collected did not pay all 0! the actual facility expenses. City of Denton City Council Minutes Meeting of May 1, 1984 Page Twelve Council Member Stephens asked how it would be determined if a pparticipant was a non-resident as some people lived outside of Denton but received mail at the Denton post office, Brinkman replied that staff would have to depend on the honesty of the patrons to some extent. Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to approve the non-resident fees for recreation program. Motion carried uanimously. 1. The Council considered approval of the Adopt-a-Park and Park Watch programs, stove Brinkman, Director of Parka and Recreation, reported that the staff was very excited about the support which had been given to the City parks. The Adopt-a-Park program would give citizens an opportunity to be rewarded for the volunteer work which they had done In the parks and to encourage more support. The Park Watch program was similar to the Police Department's Neighborhood Crime Watch program and would encourage neighbors to look out for their park areas. Chew motion, McAdams second to approve the Adopt-a-Park and Park Watch programs, Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered authorizing development on lot 6 of the Golden Triangle Industrial Park Addition, Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that moat developments and improvements had peen completed in this addition. The developer had attempted to obtain eaaementa for lot 6 but had been unsuccessful and was requesting permission to develop this one lot, Alford motion, Riddlesperger second to authorizing the development of lot 6 of the Oolden Triangle Industrial Park Addition, Motion carried unanimously, 9. The Council considered an appointment to the Texas Municipal Power Agency Board of Directors, Mayor Stewart stated that this item had not been discussed under board appointments in the Executive Session and asked what were the Council's wishes. There was no response. Stephens Motion, Chew second to reappoint Dt. Roland Vela to the TMPA Board of Directors, motion carried 5 to 1 with. Mayor Stewart abstaining because the appointment had not be discussed. 10. The Council then presented their list of budget priorities to the City Manager. Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated his first priority was streets and second priority was more money for economic development, Council Member Alford stated his first priority was streets and second priority was economic development. Council Member Riddlesperger stated his priority for budget was funding for Flow Memorial Hospital. Council Member McAdams stated she concurred and had no new items to add, Council Member Stephens stated his first priority was the use of the 69 utility transfer for street improvements. Stephens also reported that the Library board had asked him to call the Council's attention to staffing problems in the Library with the purpose of having adequate staff so as not to have to reduce the hours the Library was open, Stephens then stated that he would like for staffing needs City-wide to be reviewed and kept to a minimum, City of Denton City council minutes Meeting may 1, 1984 Page Thirteen Mayor Stewart stated that his first priority was streets, his second priority was to reach an agreement with the County Commissioners on fundingg for Flow Memorial Hospital, and the third priority was eeonomfc development to bring industry Into the City and increase the tax base. Council Member Stephens then stated that he would like to have staff look at the Police Department budget to determine the increased demand for services in the newly annexed areas, II, There was no official action on Executive Session items legal matters, real estate, personnel or board appointments. 12, The follawtng items of New Business were suggested for future agendas, 1 Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that it was the consensus of the Council for the City Attorney to look Into correct wording for the fire inspection letter to assure that it complied with the wording of the ordinance, The intent was that the letter be specific regarding who would be responsible to pay for each service. This item should be placed on the May 22 agenda. 2. The was the consensus of the Council to have the mobile home ordinance placed on the May 22 agenda for consideration of passage. 3. Council Member Stephens asked for a report on the Col.rado/ Woodrow intersection, The report could be given in the arty Manager's Status Report. The Council then adjourned into the Executive Session to discuss . legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments, There was no official action. With no fu!;ther items of business, the meeting was adjourned. RICH RD 0, STEWAR , ,OR C OTT AL S RE R 1474C City Council Minutes May 22, 1984 The council convened into a work session at SOO p,m, in the Civil Defense Room. MZMEE RS PRESENTi Mayor Steward Mayor Pro Tom Chewi council Members Alford, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ASSENTi None 1, The Council held a discussion of eligible blighted area designations in the City of Denton for the sale of industrial revenue bonds. William McDonald, Administrative Assistant, reported that the City of Denton had been Involved in the issuance of industrial revenue bonds for several years and was now seeing the benefit. Bonds had been issued in amounts ranging from $100,000 to $10,000,000, New regulations would require the designation of eligible blighted areas and also would require the area to contain 25% substandard housing units and an unemployment rate of 98, Staff's Intention was to set guidelines for future bonds over the next three years, The Community Development Block Grant target areas were being recommended for the eligible blighted designation, Eleven areas in the city had been identified by staff as appropriate for the designation. The advantages of designating all eleven areas at ane time includedi 1. a three year period would be provided to developers to make application for industrial revenue bonds 2, the cost developers had to Lear to have an area designated as an eligible blighted areas would be eliminated 3, cases for individual areas being brought to the Council would be reduced 4. a variety of areas could be developed Council Member Stephens stated that the area bounded by Carroll Boulevard and Eagle Drive should include all of the area, A small triangle where Myrtle Street, Fort Worth Drive and Carroll Boulevard split had been left out of the designated area, Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated that a large amount of the designated area was in the eastern portion of the city and some of the parcels were residential, William McDonald responded that the concept was to look at commercially zoned areas. The blighted designation did not have an adverse affect on insurance rates, Staff had tried to follow natural boundaries. Mayor Stewart stated that he had driven by these areas and had a problem that they In fact were not blighted. Portions of cone tracts might he blighted, but not the entire tract, This was one of the reasons the law had been changed. City Attorney C. J. Taylor stated there was a difference in terminology. Under the Urban Renewal Act, blighted meant an area that should he demolished. In this context, blighted meant that there was a lack of development. Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he saw this process as an . enticement to industries by way of the lower interest loans for -Development. + J City Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 Page Two Cow 7il Member Hopkins reported that several hours had been sgs nt discussing this issue at the National League of Cities conference, The intent was to encourage development in the city rather than, on the edge of the city where utilities would have to by extended, Council Member McAdams stated that this was a vehicle to encourage development and nothing more. The problem seemed to stem from the term "blighted" which had the connotation of being a program for poor people, Council Member Alford stated that the National League of Cities conference discussion had viewed this as a program to develop the unused areas in the core of cities. Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated he had a problem with the label of "blighted" as he felt it would Inhibit future residential growth. City Manager Chris Hartung responded that the terminology did riot affect zoning and was not shown on zoning maps, The primary function of designating these eleven areas together was to sxpe~3ite the bond process. 2, The Council considered the emergency addendum item and held a discussion on the City of Denton statement of purpose, City Manager Hartung distributed copies of the statement of purpose. The executive staff was proposing to circulate the statement to city employees and to selected persons outside of the city organization for the purpose of soliciting assistance In the strategic planning process. The consensus of the Council was that the draft of the statement of purpose needed to be condensed but was otherwise acceptable, 3, The Council convened into the executive sassiest to discuss Legal matters, real estate, personnel and Loard appointments, No official action was taken. The Council then convened into the regular meeting at 700 p.n, in the Council Chambers, Me W. RS PRESENT, Mayor Stowartf Mayor Pro Tom Chew; Cc"..ncll Members Alford, Chew, Hopkins, Mcklams, Riddlesperger and Stephens City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS A08ENT; None 1, The Council considered approval of the Minutes c, the Regular Meeting of December 20, 19831 the Regular Meeting of J& uary 19841 the Special Called Meeting of January 10, 1984; the 14.:ular Meeting of January 17, 19841 the Special Called Meeting of Jam.ary 24, 1984 and the Special Called Meeting of January 31, 1984, City Manager Chris Hartung asked that the approval of cbe minutes of the Special Called Meeting of January 31, 1984 be removed frc,n the agenda. Hopkins motion, McAdams second to approve the minutes as prase-.tsd, Motion carried unanimously. 21 Consent Agenda McAdams motion, Alford second to approve the Consent Agen,3a as presented. Motion carried unanimously. r City Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 Page Three Consent Agendas A. Bids and Purchase Orderer 1. Bid 1 9169 - $treetlwatee Improvemei,ta Allen Estates Mobile Nome Park 2. Bid t 9279 - Forklift 3. Bid 1 9281 - Forrestridge Paving Improvements 4. Bid t 9283 - t2 Triplex Cable S, Bid t 9284 - Distribution Transformers 6, Purchase order A 63468 to Marley Cooling Tower Company in the amount. of $4,750,00. B. Lease Agreements 1. Consider approval of a lease for Community Development Block Orant office at 235 West Hickory street, C. Plate and Replatsr 1. Consider approval of the preliminary end final replat of the Paul Hamilton Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Business Center 288 Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the J. B, Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 4, Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Lakeview Oaks Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the 4orthwood Addition, 9th Installment. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 6. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Super 8 Motel Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 7, Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Indian Ridge SuhdivisIon. (The Planning and Zoning Commis,tiion recommends approval,) 3. The Council recognized Mr, Wayman Dever of the Dart on Kiwanis Club requesting permission for a fireworks display at Fouts Field on July 4th. Mr, Ted Tripp appeared for Mr. Dever representing the Kiwanis Club. This was an annual program of the Kiwanis and the proceeds ',could benefit the Children's Clinic, The Fire Marshal had reviewed the request and given his, approval. Hopkins motion, Chew second to grant permission to the Kiwanis Club for the July 4th fireworks display at Fouts Field. 1 City Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 . Page Four Council Member Stephens recognized members of the 4th grade class from Newton Razor elementary School who were attending the Council meeting in conjunction with their studies on municipal government. 4. Public Hearings A. The Council considered the petition of Christopher Bancroft requesting a change in zoning from single family ($F-7F to the planned development (PD) olassification on an approximately 8,74 acre tract beginning at the southwest corner of Highway 377 and Collins street. It approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the following land usest 1. Residential land use on 4,00 acres at 10.5 units per acre 2. A single store 2,400 square foot retail site 3. A two story 6,000 square toot restaurant 4. Maximum of two (2) office sites (not to exceed 20,000 square feet each and not to exceed three C33 storlee) Z-1649 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Christopher Bancroft, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating the property at the corner of 317 and Collins and the portion fronting on 377 had slipped into a state of disrepair, Two of the houses at the site had burned down and the site was being used for dumping grounds, Collins and Cleveland Streets were below standard with no curbing or guttering, Three homes were currently located on the property. The City had labeled a large section near this area as blighted and this property was under petition for the same designation. The site was currently surrounded by commercial zoning with existing business on three sides. The improvements to the property would consist of two phases over a three year period. A total of 4.7 acres was involved in Phase I which would front Highway 377 and Collins Street with access from Collins. Phase I would consist of a 150 sent two story restaurant with an attached wing which would have an outdoor patio area for outdoor dining. To the south of the proposed restaurant would be two multi-storied office buildings. The structures and the site would be landscaped, Phase 1 had a projected start date of October 1984 and completion date of September 1987. Phase It would front Cleveland and Collins Streets with sixplex and Eourplex building making up the 42 residential units. Parking would be on-site and off-street. The impact of the proposed project, especially the restaurant/office phase, would be minimal on the lower Income housing in the district. There were 220 homes in the district with 11 (or 5%) on the site perimeter, 41 (or 19%) within one-fourth mile, and 179 (or 81%) beyond one-fourth mile west of Bernard Street. The residential phase would add 22 low to medium priced housing units at the site. The project would be a direct threat to only 3 houses which represented 1% of the total single family housing In the district. The trade-off would favor the district as it would allow long needed improvements and would not diminish the value of the Denton Development aulde. The intensity district boundaries were set before Carroll Boulevard was improved to its present condition which had caused this site to be improperly zoned relative to its proximity to Carroll. The Denton Development Guide Intensity regulations concerning this area prohibited any progressive or logical development at this site, The current decaying condition at this very visible site was a direct result of these intensity guidelines, The site along Highway 377 was no longer suitable either economically or logically for single family development . It was surrounded on 3 sides by commercial zoning with businesses in place, a major thoroughfare, and . substandard housing on the street behind the site. The proposed project would offer economic growth and revitalization in this distressed area, It also would offer a comprehensive plan giving consideration to existing neighborhoods by providing a buffer to the City Council Minutes Meetingg of May 22, 1984 Page Tiw commercial phase. The buffer would be the moderate density residential phase. This would be a logical solution to a current zoning problem and an improvement to a lower income neighborhood. The completed project would also help to Paso past flooding problems on Cleveland Street since the City would be compelled to maintain adequate streets in an area which had been previously ignored. it would encourage existing businesses in the area to upgrade their businesses fronts. The City of Denton Industrial D,lvelopment Authority tied granted an inducement resolution on April 23 which would allow the issuance of tax-free bonds, the proceeds of which would finance Phase I. The project would provide 20 to 30 new full-time jobs during construction and would serve as a model to other developers. Mr. Bancroft than asked the Council to disregard the Planning -and Zoning Commission rscommondation that he improve both sides of Collins Street as a condition to the petition as he felt this was an excessive and unfair request. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. David Ellison, Development Review Planner, presented slides giving an over-all view of the area and discussed the proposed zoning concept plan. As pointed out in the discussion, the petitioner had proposed a residential land use on approximately 4,0 acres with a maximum dl~nsity of 2,5 acres per acre. Staff had not yet seen any specific development plans, It was staff's understanding that the residential units would be in the later phase of the over-all development, The development plan for Phase I included a one stary retail facility with a maximum of 2,400 square fast, a restaurant • with a maximum of 6,000 square feet and office spaces. Staff did have problems from an intensity standpoint and the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0 with two conditions, The first condition was that both aides of Collins street from Fort Worth Drive to the intersection of Collins and Cleveland to improved by the developer, One-half of Cleveland across the entire frontage of the subject tract would be improved per normal City of Denton perimeter paving requirements, These street improvements could occur in phases or as the development occurred. Ellison then stated that in response to Mr. Bancroft's question regarding the procedure for perimeter paving requirements, it was true that typically ao development occurred along Unimproved perimeter streets (those streets within the city with no curbing or guttering), the developer was only responsible for his half along the entire property line, however, in a planned develop-nent request, the Council had in the past and has the authority to impose additional off-site street or other public facility Improvements that were deemed necessary. The p&Z, especially the Chairperson, had felt very strongly about the need for the developer to improve both sides of Collins along the entire frontage from he intersection of Fort Worth Drivc to Cleveland Street. this condition had been specifically discuss.,d at the P&Z meeting and Mr. Bancroft had not raised any objections. It was Ellison's personal opinion that ample opportunity had be,in afforded to discuss this condition with the P&Z, to explore alternatives, and request the condition not be imposed. Perhaps Mr. Bancroft had plugged in numbers and felt that it was not economically feasible for him to have to make improvements to both sides of Collins. However, due to the fact that opportunity had been afforded, it seemed a bit unfair to request the deletion of the paving requirement now, Mayor Pro Tem Chew asked if Mr. Bancroft would t© reimbursed as other property in the area was developed. Ellison responded noti not for street improvements. City Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 Page SIX Council Member Riddlesperger asked what was the width of Collins Street, Ellison responded he was not sure but Collins probably had the present right-Hof-xay width of SCE to 60 feet and a paving width of something in the area of 30 test. Council Member I26ddlesperger asked how far Mr. Bancroft would have to pave to reach the entrace of his property on Collins. E1liv,n replied If normal development standards were imposed, or the subdivision roqul,red no additional off-sits facilities, Mr. Bancroft would only have I,o pave his half of Collins Street. r:ouncil Member 'Aiddleeperger stated that he was asking about the entrance from t;he highway to Mr, Bancroft's entrance into his business on Collins and asked why he should need to pave the full width any furthor than to the entrance. It appeared that Bancroft should pave one,-half all the way and the full width to his business entrance. Council Mamter Stephens responded that people would come from both directions all .he way to Avenue, A. Ellison reported that there were several reasons the paving was required, It was felt that with a more intensive type land use such as this one, specifically retail, office and moderate intensity type housing, would negatively impact streets that were designed for low intensity or residential type land use, By requesting this type zoning (if tho development were constructed), the developer would create additional traffic beyond that which would normally be placed along public utilitiss if the parcel were developed as single family or other lower density type land use. There was a drainage problem . in the area. The City Engineer had indicated that the drainage was designed conceptually to be handled mostly on Fort Worth Drive. Part of street improvements traditionally included drainage improvements. E111son stated he felt that was a matter of ethics. If an individual wfis awarded zoning that would allow morn intense and dense land use, and would in turn receive a certain economic advantage, the Planning and Zoning Commission felt the developer should be required to make additional off-site public utility improvements beyond those normally attached. Council Member Riddlespergex stated that Collins was a very narrow street paved back to Cleveland, Ba-rnard and beyond. He asked If the city could require property owners on the other side of Collins to pay their fair share of the paving. Riddlesperger asked for an opinion from the City Attorney, City Attorney C. J. Taylor responded that couH be accomplished by assessment, The Courts looked at enhancement of the value of property abutting public streets but only the enhancement of the value of the lots, Council Member Riddlesperger stated that there was apparently a block of land in the center of this area that Mr. Bancroft did not own and asked who would pay for (the pavement on both sides of that particular parcel, Ellison replied that the recommendation was that Mr, Bancroft be required to pave that area as well, Council Member Riddlesperger asked if that property owner would not have enhamaed value, • Ellison responded that would depend on whether the C'ounctl rheose to approve a subsequent change in zoning request, on that particular parcel. city Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 Page Seven Council Member Riddlssperger stated that he was asking because it to that the to 45C toot i1whiwas ch asking also uusual nenhance tithe property Aonrthe other side of the street. itiddiespsrgsr further stated that, in his judgement, most of the traffic into Mr. Bancroft's property would come from Fort Worth Drive and did not believe that Collins Street would have much additional traffic. He had a t obi e w with requiring the petitioner to pay for all of the paving improvemnts. Ellison stated that he would take issue with theea ount or additional traffic. In graphic leYgenerates 110 Y rvehiols trips a multi-family dwelling typically would per day per dwelling. A retail land user tarQrdeti°nOafficsglandaue approximately 630 vehicle trips per s as many vehicle tripe as would generate approximately one-half retail. This represented a tremendous increase in traffic generated and activity at this site. To address the issue of fairness, the P&Z felt this individual was requesting uptoning and his property realize anyntimmediate pbanefit across economic the street avantages to Yalu* owners and from the toning change unless they petitioned for a zoning upgrade themselves, cou not Council to Member pay their part of thekpavingras they wo ld be getting the others to pay part paving done with no assessment, Ellison replied that he believed the City Attorney had addressed that question previously. Mr. Bancroft's development would be the cause of the increase in traffic. and esstated peciallysthatlgenerated bydt he ofrfeimcendous this McAdams Council traffic in Member retail areas of the development. later wand atthewoCophaAe would also that this which Stephens Council evelopment Member • d should consider the entire project as it was one planned development. Council Member Hopkins asked if Mr, !Bancroft would improve the streets as the land was developed. ELlison responded yesr staff was looking at this patition as a two phase development. The recommendation had been based on the intensity area concept in the Denton Development Ouide. A high intensity area (such as industrial uses, commercial, Eaa e i tense retail, etc.) would require pLanning of public ed. Those areas improvements based on the level of intensity g were centered around major thoroughfares. A moderate intensity area typically had corners of secondary arterial, but again major type thoroughfares such as Sherman Drive, etc. If approved this would already lower boyondntthe sitiyntaernesaitwhich staff standards represent hdetermined intensity in a with the zoning tmon raised atE themP&Zcmeatingaby toning ' the petitioner as to why this particular area had nlraadysiinsl,1aceg low intensity given the commercial/retail toning One thing the Council should consider was how well the axisting facilities can handle additional commercial/retail uses. Obviously Collins and Cleveland area was not subdivided or laid ou,c w:th public, wouldhave Ultimately tosy pay n genepi:aL land uses. existing dcfo higher either .-he developer or t to upgrade the public utilities. nbelseh, maki'ng 1~elieved the developere pay theientir the problem and could not see e cost, City Council Minutes Meetin of May 22, 1984 Page Eight CounoII Member McAdams stated the petitioner was requesting financing through industrial devolopment bonds which gave spo.r al credit, an ability to do something he could not otherwise 3a. Poop le who own property on one tide or the other of the street and will not benefit frog thist in fact, taxes might Fe raised as a result of the devolopment, They did not ask for this dsvolopme,rt. The paving was a way to recover the cost of actually putting ia. a high intensity development which would benefit the overall area. The Counoil would defeat their purpose if they did not plan well in terms of providing adequate streets to carry the traffic. The dew lopment can be constructed in such a way as to get a return on the cost of paving the street, It was not fair to say to the paTle who live there that the developer would like to develop a large parcel of property which will generate a lot of traff~cv unfortunately this will require the street ao be paved and you +311 have to pay for it. Ellison stated that he would like to clarify some points. No petitions had been received of this sort at this location or sear the location since the implementation of the Development Qls.ie. Also, retail or office was not t'ne only alternative for development at this type. Moderate type horsing was possibilityi therefore, the inferencs that the i,.~one ity policy in some ways dece_red development was not accurate. Mayor Stewart stated that he believed this was a good pIa,r,ned development with the exception of the portion on Carroll Boul-ward which was for commercial use, Arterial streets should be uswl to move traffic and not attract it, At a recent U. S. Conference of Mayor conference one of the topics was "Don't Turn our Thorougghfares into Restaurant Alleys". The Council should con3_3er maintaining arterial as traMc movers and stay with the poll-r of no curb cuts on Carroll Boulevard as much as possible. . Council Member Stephens stated that he disagreed with the Mayne in that this would be a start for improvements In the noightn-',ood which would extend to more than just the one site, He believed :.rat the positives of the planned development would offaac the negative of the a curb cut on Carroll Boulevard. Chew motion, McAdams second to approve the petition with the two conditions recommended by the planning and Zoning Commission. Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to amend the main motion, to include the condition that the petitioner be required to pave manly to the lot which he owned on Collins, Council Member Stephens stated Allison had addressed this issuy Ind than the development would be done in phases to allow Mr, Ban-_.-aft adequate time to take care of the paving requirements. Council Member Riddlesperger stated tt,~t he wanted to make it ::ear that it would be fully permissible to say that Mr, Bancroft it! not have to pave in front of someone else's property. Council Member Hopkins stated that another alternative was to stave Mr. Bancroft pave the full width of the street to his propert" and to have him pave his half from Cleveland to Fort Worth Drive new and pave the other half during the second phase. Vote on amendment to the main motion was Alford, Riddlesperge_ and Hopkins "aye 11, Stephens, Chew, McAdams, and Stewart 1,ry Amendment felled by a vote of 4 to 3, Vote on main motion passed by a vote of 6 to 1 with Mayor S4i-wart casting the nay vote. S, The Council then considered the emergency agenda id,,ban3um item to adopt an ordinance approving a quit claim of any interest the City of Denton may have on a certain 20 foot r.tavel road lc,zLted city council Minutes Meatingg of May 22, 1984 Page N►me on a tract of land at the intersection of Collins Street and Carroll Boulevard. David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that no right-of-way had been dedicated and no easement had aver bean established, The following ordinance was presented; No. 84-59 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF ANY INTEREST THE CITY OF DENTON MAY HAVE IN A PORTION OF A TRACT 01' LAND RESERVED FOR STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHIN THE CITY OF D+E\'CON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM M ED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY IN SAID LAND TO THE OWNER OF THE ADJACENT TRACT OF LAND! AN0 DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted. On roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "Aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 4. Public Hearings 8, The Council then returned to the agenda to hold a public hearing on the petition of Christopher Laurance requesting a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification (or two-family (duplex) land use on a 5.1 acrd tract located adjacent and north of Windsor Drive and south of the new elementary school adjacent to Evers Park, If approved, the planned development (PD) would permit the construction of twenty- five (25) duplexes (a total of 50 dwelling units), Z-1652 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Christopher Laurence, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that the property was bounded on the south by Windsor Street, on the west by Evers parkway, on the east by Evers Park and to the north was Evers Elementary School, A fence would be constructed between the development and the elementary school. The use of internal streets would be encouraged. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that J reply forms had been mailed with ' returned in favor and 0 in opposition. The Planning and Zoning Commission felt this was an attractive land use and development. The internal streets would be private and not maintained by the city. The recommendation of P&Z was unanimous to approve the petition with 5 conditions, 1, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification for two-family (duplex) land use on a 5,1. acre tract located adjacent and north of Windsor Drive and south of the new elementary school adjacent to Evers Park, The following ordinance was presented NO. 84-60 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CEN^ON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS AD)PTED AS AN APPENDIX OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. . 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 5.116 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE B.B.B. & C.R.R. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0, 186, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE, DATE, City Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 Page Ten Ridd,'asperger motion, Hopkins second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye,"" Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye., Alford "aye," Riddleaperger "aye, Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of Eleanor Green requesting at change in zoningq from office (0) to the planned development (PD) classification for neighborhood service uses at 800 North Locust Street, The property was approximately ,49 acre in size and was located at the northeast corner of North Locust and Marshall Street. Z-1653 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Ms. Eleanor Green, the property owner, spoke in favor of the petition stating that she was seeking retail sales capabilities under the planned development zoning, Ms. Green had been approached about leasing the area to someone who wanted to teach art and sell artwork and supplies at the location, No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Development Review Technician, reported that in June 1981 the property had been rezoned as the site was a non-conforming use lot with a duplex, The site did have immediate access to a major thoroughfare, The P&Z had recommended approval with 3 conditions. 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from office (O) to the planned development (Pit) classification for neighborhood service uses at 800 North Locust Street, The following ordinance was preeentedt N0. 84-61 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING tAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY .49 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE B.B.B. & C.R.R. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT 140. 185, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens .motion, Chew second that the ordinance he adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously, E. The Council held a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 81.44 acres of land beginning at Swisher/Shiloh Road, A-1 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, spoke in favor of the annextion stating that 2 notices had been mailed with 0 returned, A slide was shown of the property and a map was available for the Council to view. A mobile home suM ivision was proposed on the east section of the tract which would extend to Shady Shores. A mobile home park was proposed on approximately 40 acres on the western section. Surrounding land uses were single family on Swisher Road, east of the site was Chaparral Estates in Shady Shores, and generally the remainder of the other surrounding land was vacant. Watkins presented a graph depicting the cost to bring this area into the city versus revenues which would be generated, The Council would need to judge if the potential cost was worth the trade-off to gain control of land use in this area. d' City Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 M Page Eleven Council Member Hopkins stated that this comparison of cost and revenues generated was what he had wanted t,: see, If the pity did not control the land use, someone else would and this urea had drainage problems, Council Member Riddlesporger stated that this annexation would benefit Shady shores more than it would DOnton. Mr. Curtis Hogsdon, owner of 66 acres oi! property in the proposed annexation, spoke In opposition stating that he had never received notification and that he was approximately one year away from beginning to develop the property. Council Member Riddlesperger asked Mr, Hogsdon if all of this proposed annexation tract was his property, Mr. Hogsdon responded that he and his neighbor represented approximately one-half of the parcel. The d'.cyor closed the public hearing. D. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of Russell Trapp requesting a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to the two family (2-F) classification on an approximately 0,9116 acre tract located adjacent and west of North Elm Street and adjacent and east of Bolivar Street approximately 400 feet south of Headlee Street, The Alayor opened the public hearing. Mr, Russell Trapp, the property owner, spoke In favor of the petition stating that he was requesting to divide the lot and construct four duplexes. Two of the units would front on Bolivar . and two would front on North Elm, Council Member Hopkins asked if these unite were similar to the, duplexes Mr. Trapp was building at another location, Mr, Trapp responded no; these units would to smaller, No one spoke in oppositioi., The Mayor closed the public hearing. David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that 28 reply forms had been mailed with 2 returned in favor and 2 returned in opposition. An incorrect aerial photograph had peen mailed with the reply forms but the error had been rectified, The P&Z recommended approval of the petition, 1, The council considered adotion of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from single family (SF-7) to the txo family (2-F) classification on an approximately 0,9116 acre tract located adjacent and west of North Elm Street and adjacent and east of Bolivar Street approximately 400 feet south of Headlea Street, The following ordinance was presented, NO. 84-62 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTCtt, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS A00PTED AS AN APPENDIX OF THE CODE CF ORDINANCES OF TIV, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE a0, 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0 ,9116 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE N, MEISENHEIMER SURVEY, ASSTPkCT N0, 810, DENTON COUNTY, TEXASt AND MORE PARTICULARLS' DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Cityy Council Mlautes Meeting of May 22, 19A4 Page Twelve McAdams ma.ion, Hopkins second that the ordinanoo be adopted, on roll call Jotq, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Ri,Jdlesperger "aye," Chew "nay," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried 6 to 1 with Mayor Pro Tom Chew casting the nay vote. F. The Council held a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 20 acres of land located along Swisher "cad. A-2 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that a mobile home subdivision with septic system and wells for water had been proposed in this location. Staff had advised the developer that the proposal did not meet County specifications and not received any word back. No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Council Member Stephens stated that according to the map of the Denton city limits, this parcel was between the City of Denton and shady 9hores, As Shady Shores was a general law city and could not expand without Denton's permission, the Council could delay taking any action. Hopkins motion, Chew second to discontinue the annexation proceedings. Motion carried unanimously. 0, 'The Council held a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 522.76 acres of land beginning 350 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of U. S. Highway 380. A-3 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, spoke in favor of the petition stating that maps were available. Nine reply forms had been mailed with zero returned. The existing city limits line was on Highway 380. Staff was proposing to come down to a 280 acre proposed development which consisted of 50 acres for use by mobile homes and the remainder to be use for site-build homes on 1 acre tracts. The water would be furnished via a well system installed on Mills Road and Grissom road, This would be in violation of the subdivision rules and regulations. Trenches had already be dug for water lines, Staff was recommended that a 500 feet wide strip be extended from the existing city limits line down to include the area d,~,signated for the modular home subdivision. This subdivision would have approximately 550 units and staff felt this annexation would be advisable to control growth. Ms. Faye Mulkey spoke in opposition stating that the proposed annexation area included 9 acres on the east aide of her property. Ms. Mulkey stated that her property was 30 acres in size and J not want 9 acres in the city and asked if the Council would consider removing that portion from the annexation proceedings, Mr. Kelly Brooke spoke in opposition stating that he owned property on 380 and asked when the Council intended to put sewer lines in this area, Council Member Stephens asked how the staff had set the annexation line that took in Ms. Mulkey's 9 acres. Watkins responded that the staff had followed a survey line but felt they could work out a Solution to Ms. Mulkey's request, . Watkins also stated that sewer lines were available in this area upon request. The cost to tie on would be paid by the developer or the property owner. City council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 Page Thirteen H, The Council held a public hearing on eligible blighted area designations in the City of Denton for the sale of Industrial Revenue bonds. The Mayor opened the public hearing, William McDonald, Administrative Assistant, spoke In favor stating that the eligible blighted area designations were required in order to allow the city to offer companies tax free development bonds, This would benefit the city and the developers, The request before the Council was for the designation for community development block grant target area, Existing zoning was commercial or light industrial in the areas. Mr, Bob Tripp spoke In opposition of the designation for area H on the map as it was a fast growing area and not blighted. Mr. Burch spoke in opposition stating that money had been expended to put in the Hickory Creek sower line and felt the city should follow that line. City Manager Hartung responded that these particular areas had been chosen due to the commercial or light industrial zoning which was already in place, Council Member Hopkins stated that these sites were within the city limits with utilities already in place but were not being fully utilized, Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that most of the undeveloped land along the Hickory Creek sewer line was not it the city limits, • 6, Ordinances A. The Council eoneidored adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 2,99 acres of land located east of the existing city limit along Highway 377, south of Brush Creek Road, Z-1641 Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that this property had been proposed as a 53 acre estates subdivision with one-half of the property In the city limits and the other one-half out of the city, Since the institution of annexation proceedings, the property had changed ownership. The now owner was proposing a 172 acre development. If the annexation were continued, the city would be furnishing city services to part of the development. Hopkins motIoi,, Aiford second to defer the annexation. Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 75,21 acres of la,,d located west of Interstate 35W and north of Corbin Road, Z-1645 Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that this was the final action on this voluntary annexation. The following ordinance was presentedi NO. 84-63 AN ORDINANCE ANW,'XING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BEING ALL 'PHA'r LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 75,21 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE 0, BRE%gM R • SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 56, AND D, DAUGHERTY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 357, DENTON, COUNTY, TEXASt CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS Cityy Council Minutes Mee EIng of May 22, 1984 Page Fourteen AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY! AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Hopkins motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," 3tephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously, C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings on the proposed annexation of approximately 9,013 acres of land beginning approximately 700 rest east of Sherman Drive. A-4 Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that this voluntary annexation was part of a 130 acre development north of the city, Staff was recommending the first public hearing be held on June 5, the second public hearing on June 19 and the institution of annexation proceedings on July 10, Cour,il Member Riddlesperger asked how close this parcel was to Hartlee Field, Watkins responded it was approximately 1000 feet from the entry, The following ordinance was presented: N0. 84-64 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENT ON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, • Stephens motion, McAdams second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance repealing and reenacting Article 111, Chapter 23, of the Ccde of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, relating to mobile homes, mobile home parks and travel trailerst providing a penalty of a fine not to exceed two hundred dollarat providing a severability clause; repealing all ordinances In conflict herewitht and declaring an effective date, Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that this ordinance had been discussed several times and hoped that the latest revisions were consistent with the wishes of the City council, The following ordinance was preaentedi NO, 84-65 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING ARTICLE III, CHAPTER 23 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, RELATING TO MOBILE HOMES, MOBILE: HOME PARt<S AND TRAVEL TRAILERS! PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED 0OLLARS1 PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE? REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HE REWITHt AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens motion, McAdams second that the ordinance he adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "nay," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "nay," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried 5 to 2 with Council ,Xember Hopkins and Mayor Pro Ten Chew casting the nay votes. City Council Minutes Meetingg of May 22, 1984 Page Fiftesn E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amendment to the Electric Rate Schedules, Ordinance No, 83-102, Schedule AF (Athletic Fields). Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that when the new electric rates had been adopted in the fall, the athletic field category had not been adequately addressed, The following ordiance was presentedi N0, 84-66 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 23-21 OF ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 25 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY PROVIDING FOR A NEW ELECTRIC SERVICE RATE FOR ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING SERVICESi AMENDING THE "RATE" PROVISIONS FOR SERVICE DEPOSITS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC SERVICESt REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Hopkins motion, McAdams second that the ordinance to adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amendment to the Electric Rate Schedules, Article II, Section 25-95, ordinance No. 83-102, Schedule-Service Deposits. Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this item related to customer service. On commercial accounts, a deposit of $300 was required, If the customer defaulted, the city lost money. This would adjust the amount to one-sixth of the annual bill. . Council Member Stephens asked how this situation was handled in other cities. Nelson responded in various wayst some cities required a hind through a bonding company. This section was included in the follow`.nq ordinances NO, 84-66 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-21 OF ARTICLE 11 OF CHAPTER 25 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DEN'TON, TEXAS, BY PROVIDING FOR A NEW ELECTRIC SERVICE RATE FOR ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING SERVICES! MIENDINO THE "RATE" PROVISIONS FOR SERVICE DEPOSITS FOR RESIDENTIAL. AND COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC SERVICES1 REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, McAdams motion, Stephens second to adopt this section of Ordinance No. 84-66, On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously. G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amendment to the Water/Wastewater Rate Schedules, Ordinance No. 84-09, Schedule S-8, Charles Cryan, Administrative Assistant to the Utility Director, reported :hat the Council had been addressed at the April 10 meeting by owners of mobile home parks regarding those parks which received only sewer service, Staff had net with the mobile home park owners and had adjusted the rates. The 1,5 multiplier would remain. city council Minutes Meeting of May 221 1984 Page Sixteen . The following ordinance was peasontodi NO, 84-67 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-49 OF CHAPTER 25 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDED VOLUME CHARGE FOR THE NET MONTHLY RATE FOR RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE USERS WITHOUT CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (SCHEDULE 8 811 REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITIi AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Riddlesperger motion, Alford second that the ordinance be adopted, On roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously, if, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amendment requiring garagekeopers insurance coverage relating to tow service. Clovis George, Denton Police Department, reported that there was a liability to the City under the present ordinance on wrecker service, The recommendation was that wrecker services on the list have garagekespers insurance and to have the city named in the policy, Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that this was needed. The following ordinance was presenteds NO. 84-68 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS RELATING TO TOW SERVICE BY REQUIRING GARAGEKEEPERS INSURANCE COVERAGEI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, McAdams motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted, On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddl.osperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously, I, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing an additional penalty to defray costs of collection for delinquent taxes, City Manager Hartung reported that under the state law, when a city hired an outside collection agency to collect delinquent taxes, an additional amount could be added to the collection to cover the costs, The following ordinance was presented, NO. 84-69 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE :ODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO PROVIDE FOR A PENALTY ON DELINQUENT TAXES TO DEFRAY THE COST OF COLLECTION THEREOFI REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Stephens motion, ''•,ew second that the ordinance to adopted, On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carrie.i unanimoue).y, 7, Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution declaring certain areas of the City of Denton as bllghted for the purpose of allowing the sale of Industrial Revenue bonds to improve these areas, city council minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 • Page Seventeen The following resolution was presentedi R£ S 0 L U T I 0 N WHEREAS, Resolution adopted March 4, 1980, by the City Council of the CityY of Denton, Texas, the City of Denton authorized the creation of the City of Denton Industrial Development Authority to exercise the powers of such corporations organized pursuant to the Development Corporation Act of 1979, as amended (the 'Act"h and WHEREAS, the Act together with the Rules for Issuing industrial Development Bonds promulgated thereunder by the Texas Economic Development Commission (the "Rules"), provide for the financing of projects for commercial uses) and WHEREAS, said Act and Rules provide certain procedures with respect to the establishment and designation of Eligible Blighted Areas within the City for the purposes of financing projects for commercial uses and alleviating economically disadvantaged areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASi SECTION I. That the areas outlined on the attached maps which are designated A, B, C, D, E, F, 0, H, f, J and K and whose boundaries and are further described in Exhibits A attached hereto are established and designated as Eligible Blighted Areas for tha purposes of the Act and the Rules, all being portions of the City, SECTION II, That the City finds that the areas designated herein at; Eligible Blighted Areas contain a substantial number of under employed people and substandard or deteriorating structures which impair or arrest the sound growth of the City and are areas that constitute an economic or social liability in their present condition or use, The information attached as Exhibit a further supports the City's decision to designate the areas referenced in Exhibits A as Eligible Blighted Areas, SECTION III, That the City finds and represents to the Texas Econcaic Development commission that the availability of financing of projects for commercial uses under the Act will conttitute significantly to the alleviation of the blighted conditions found to exist in the designated Eligible Blighted Areas, SECTION IV, That the principal types of projects for commercial caes desired and authorized by the City to enhance its redevelopment efforts in the Eligible Blighted Areas are those projects allowed under the Act and as may be limited by more restrictive policies established by the City of Denton Industrial Development Authority. SECTION V, That the City represents that it will review all prae'e:t descriptions for approval of specific projects for commercial uses in order t, determine whether such projects are consistent with ::-,e City's objectives for redevelopment of the Eligible Blighted Areas, SECTION VI, That attached hereto as Exhibit C is a description of proposed public. improvements to be made in the Eligible Blighted City Council Minutes Meeting of May 22, 1984 Page Eighteen Areas, the estimated commencement and approximate mohedule for such public improvements, and the source of funds the City will use for such purposes, all of which is based on thr City's best estimates as of the date of adoption of this resolution. SECTION VII. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and the City Secretary is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Texas Economic Development Commission. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 22nd day of May, 1984. RrCHARB 0. AR , KAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST i MARLoTTE ALLEN, CITY ETAR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY, Hopkins motion, McAdams second that the revolution be approved, on roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart Motion carried unanimously. B, The Council considered approval of a resolution appointingg Dr, Roland Vela to the Texas Municipal Power Agency Board of Directors for a '_wo year term from July, 1984 to July, 1986. The following resolution was presented, R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the term of office for Place 3 of the City of Denton, Texas on the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency will terminate July 1, 19841 and WHEREAS, Roland Vela was heretofore appointed by the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas to Place 3 on the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Power Agency and has been serving as such Director to the present times NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI SECTION I, Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Ordinance No. 75-22 of the City of Denton, Texas, Roland Vela Is hereby appointed to the two year term of office to P13ce 3 on the Board of Directors of the Texas Municipal Paler Agency. The term of office beginning Jul), 1, L984 and ending June 30, 1986, SECTION It. • This Resolution shall become effective from and after Its date of passage, and it is so ordered. City Council Minutes Meekingq of May 22, l5j84 Page Nineteen PASSED AND APPROVED this the 72nd day of May, 1984. RICKARD 0. STEWART, KAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST i CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C, J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY1 Stephens motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Al::>rd "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously, 8. There was no official action on Executive Session items of heal matters, real estate, personnel, or board appointments, 9. New Business The following items of new business were suggestedt 1. Council Member Stephens asked for a follow up report or_ the management letter, . 2. Council Member Hopkins asked for a report on the st;nal light at Colorado, 3, Council Member Hopkins asked I!or a report on the insp~.-cticn of modular homes, 4, Council Member Hopkins asked Cor a report on P&Z activttses (length of time it took an Item to be placed on the P&'L agenda). The Council then convened Into Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, 4,nd board appointments. No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned, #TCfIAIiFS~ STEWAIFT-,-,AYfff- CHARLOTTE ALLEtT7-7iT7-T'i<AST7 R • :476C city Counoil Minutes June 5, 1994 The Council convened into a work session at 500 p,m, in the Defense Room, MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Stewart) Mayor Pro Tem Chew) Coun,z:1 Members Alford, Chow, Hopkins, McAdams, tnd Riddlesperger City Manager, Assistant City Attorney and '.:ty Secretary MEMBERS ABSENT: Council Member Stephens 1. The Council received a report on retiree insurance, Kathryn Usrey, Director of Personnel, distributed a rate sheet ml, Ch outlined the cost of retiree insurance as a poet emplm/larent benofit. Three different rates ($10 a month, $25 a month, and S-*, a month) had been used, Without an actuarial study, the impact wr.~Lija be greater than the contribution on the balance sheet during be first five years, For example, during the first year a eontribut on of $14,400 would be reflected on i.,e city's balance sheet as $190,000 and in the fifth year a contribution of $24,000 would be reflected as $394,000, Mayor Pro Tem Chew asked how many current retirees did the city !),ate. Usrey responded 24 with 7 more to to added this year. Staff assumei there would be approximately 4 added per year, Staff recommend,; to offer an HMO to current and retiring employees with the smpl,rp-ees . making the contribution on their own, Mayor Stewart stated that the City of Sherman carried rga:red employees on their insurance plan and had started out wIt:+ an $11,000 contribution in 1979, The expected expense to Sherman :n 5 to 7 years is $3,000,000, The HMO plan being recommended by staff seemed to be In line. Council Member Stephens joined the meeting. Council Member Hopkins asked how many of the 24 current retirees were in the age group of 65 years or over, City Manager Hartung responded that this was not known, The auditors, Arthur Andersen, had been contacted but a precise d:11ar figure could not be obtained without an actuarial. staff had tried to get a ballpark figure for consideration and tried to find i way to address the issue of retiree insurance without starting an :,pen- ended program, Council Member Hopkins asked if under an HMO, if the city n.tce a contribution would it fall unrier the Faste rule. Usrey responded yes, Hartung stated that the city had to change their reporting suc!, that accrued nick leave and vacation leave would to listed on the 'ca:anct sheet as contingent liabilities, Council Member Hopkins stated the Counoil appreciated the wor's that Kathryn Usrey had done and would like to make a contritut::-n to retired employees insurance, but the possible liability 9ee:a•a•-4 to make that very difficult, ?iayor Pro Tem Chow asked what was ceing done for disabled employees who were not of retirement age. City Council Minutes Meeting of June 5, 1984 Page Two Uer% responded that the Texas Municipal Retirement service had a disai'.ity plan plus long term disability. This plan would pay for one year past the point the employee was removed from the city payroll, Mayor Pro 'rem Chow stated that disabled 50 year olds would have a problem getting any insuranoe. Hartung responded that staff shared the same concern and that was why long term disabi:.ity had been added to the insurance program two years ago, These issue would be addressed during the budget process as it represented an on-going commitment. Assistant City Manager McKean stated that staff folt the HMO was the best choice for retiree insurance at the present time. The prcgrar; could be offered now as a pay as you go plan and considered again during the budget discussions, A contract for the HMO would be brought back to the Council. 2. The Council held a discussion of Planning and Zoning Commission processing times, Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported that the City of Denton probably had the fastest time from when a petition was filed with staff until it was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. T'nn City of Dallas required a written application and it still would take 6 months, If a petition were filed in the City of Arlington in June, the zoning would be considered in December if there were not difficulties, in Denton a zoiiing petition could be completed within 6 weeks if there were no problems. Local developers felt the process was too slow but out of town developers thought it was fine. Council Member Hopkins stated that hin question was not the length of time to receive zoning but the length of time it took for a petition to get. to the Planning and Zoning Commission, Meyer re.aponded that the P&Z had set a limit of 5 zoning cases per meeting but were willing to hear more than 5 if that was the Council's wishes, Assistant City Manager Rick Svuhla stated that the subdivision rules and regulations controlled platting, curb cuts, drainage, etc. and tended to slow the process, After the t&Z made heir recommendation, there was a public hearing with the City Council and then the zoning was granted. Council Member Hopkins asked if additional staff was needed in the Planning an,l Communi°y Development department or did the P&Z noel to meet more often. The P&Z needed to make a recommendation. Meyer responded that the Planning and Zoning Commission realized that growth was coming but also felt that citizens should be heard, The W& was consiclering limiting the time allow for citizens to speak during public hearings to speed up the meetings. Mayor Stewart stated that he was pleased with the job that the Planning and Community Development department was ioing, 3, V h a Council held a discussion on Flow Memorial Iospital and the Library, City Manager Ha r.tung reported that. several meetings had been :;eld with the Hospital Administrator and Judge Cole in an effort to Eind solutions to ease the current Medicare/Medicaid payback proclem, Several alternatives had benn discussed such as the hospital issuing bonds or a straight loan arrangement. It was suggosted that a contract arrangement be drawn between the hospital and the city and county, Judge Cole had indicated Chat the Commissioner Court did not intend to create any problems with the city on the current City Council Minutes Meeting dune 5, 1984 Page Three ee Medicare/Medicaid payback but this issue did raise questions for the future, It was felt that this was not th.N time to enter into a contract with the county regarding Flow Hospital as legal questions should first be resolved, staff reoommandation was that the City Manager, City Attorney and Hoapit i Administrator negotiate a contract for short term funding. Flow was looking Into staff reductions and increasl..d currently charged fees, Approval of short term funding would show that the Council was responsive to the needs of Flow Hospital. Two issues would need to be addressodi 1. If the Count yy was going to have outside legal advise on the hospital, should the Clty also 2. The issue of indigent care should be deferred to the City Attorney Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he agreod that the city should also have legal advisors, Lawyers who defend indigent clients are paid but then state that doctors who treat indigent patients should not be paid. Council Member Hopkins stated the Council should instruct the Legal Department to proceed and research where the Council stood -n the issue of funding for indigents and paupers, Council Member Stephens asked if the Legal Department would have to the time to complete the research. Assistant City Attorney Joe Morris stated that City Attorney Taylor was in the hospital and Assistant City Attorney Hunter had been on medical leave for 2 months. He did not know if he wool: have sufficient time for this research but would discuss It with t'ne City !tanager, The consensus of the Council was to look for outside health related legal assistance and to bring a contract back for consideration. Council Member Hopkins stated that he believed the City Manager was correct and the Council should move on these issues. The Council should know what was happening with the personnel at Flow as it was not the city's intention to hurt the hospital, The economics of the hospital should be considered on a bi-weekly basis, On the issue of Library funding, Assistnnt City Manager Betty McKean reported that a letter would be forwarded to the County Commissioners with a copy of the proposed budget for the Library. rf the County decided not to fund the requested 25%, it would be the recommendation of stare to have a city library and sell cards, McKean had met with Judge Cole and there did not seem to be a plan in place for a library system. Council Member Stephens stated that the Commissioners Court was split on this issue, ,.-Kean reported that acme cities in the county did not fund their MI libraries at all if moneys were receivud from the Commissioners, The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, anti hoard appointments. No official action was taken. i The Council than convened into the Regular Meeting at 7100 in the Council Chambers. MEMBERS PRESENT, Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tem Chows Council Members Alford, Chew, Hopkins, McAdams, and Riddlesperger and Stephens City Manager, Assistant City Attorney and City Secretary city Council Minutes Meeting of June S, 1984 Page Four MEMOERS ABSENTi None 1. The council oonsidered approval of the Minutes o! the Special Called Meeting of January 31. 1984, Riddlesperger motion, Stephens second to approve the minutar as presented, Motion carried unanimously, The mayor presented an award of honor from the National 3.afety Association to the Fire Department, Chief Gentry accepted the hard, 2. Consent Agenda Staff requested that item 2.A.2 - Bid 1 9273 for circuit breaker conversion be removed from the consent agenda. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the Consent Agenda with item 2.A,2 removed, Motion carried unanimously, Consent Agendai A, Bids and Purchase Ordersi 1. Bid 1 9254-1 - Modular furniture 2. REMOVED 3. Bid 1 9285 - Utility marki-ig system 4. Bid 1 9286 - Pothole patch machine 5. Bid 1 9287 - Brush chipper 6. Bid A 9288 - 60" cut mower 7. Bid 1 9289 - Concrete saw 8. Bid 1 9295 - Office furniture 9. Purchase Order 4 63108 to 8ailoy Meter Coma-_ny in the amount of $3,514.00 10. Purchase Order 1 63396 to Gaylord Broth-trf Inc. in the amount of $4,980,00 1l. Purchase Order 1 63,171 to Anacomp Micrcgrz.hics in the amount of $5,000.00 B. Plats and Replatsi 1, Approval of the preliminary replat of lots 3, 4 and 5, block A, of the Lincoln Park Ad~i;tSon, (The Planning and Zoning Commission reccrmend9 approval.) 2. Approval of the preliminary replat of lots : and 2 of the Adkisson Addition (Denton County :ill). (The Planning and Zoning Commission re,-:m;r:ends approval,) 3. Approval of the preliminary plat of the C_mrierce Center Addition, (The Planning and -'cning Commission Vecommends approval.) City Council Minutes Meeting of June 3, 1984 . Page Flee 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of lots 1, 2 and 3, hlook 1, of the Jannis Street Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) Approval of the preliminary plat of Section I of the Windsor Park Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 10, The Council considered agenda item $10 tc rs'ceive a report on pollution in Denton, Mayor Stewart stated that representatives from the special class for the deaf at Olnnings Elementary school were in the audience. Those students had completed a class project on pollution in Denton and had presented the report to him. These problem areas would be investigated, The report would be on file in the office of the City Secretary. 3, The Council returned to the agenda order and considered approval of the Parks and Recreation Department comprehensive caster plan. Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation, reported that the master plan had been developed over the last year. Approval was needed prior to implementation. Brinkman distributed letters of support from Mr. Clovis Morrisson and Dr. McGee of the Denton Independent School District. The plan had received approval from the DiSD and the School Board, Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he was impressed ;y, the time and effort which had been put Into the plan, Brinkman responded that the completion of the plan would not have been possible without the assistance of over 100 citizens 'ho had given of their time to this effort, Mr. Mike Campbell, Chairperson of the Parks and Recreation Board, stated that he did not have more to add other than he felt it was an excellent idea to have a comprehensive plan and ti}at implementation nodded to begin. Council Member Stephens asked if the plan was set in concrete or was it rather more conceptual, Brinkman responded that recommendation regarding joint use of -,hurch and school facilities would be going Into effect, The research Into new areas and facilities was conceptual, John Traveile, Parks and Recreation Board, thanked everyone •who had been associated with the completion of the master plan for their hard work. Mr. Raymond Pitts stated that the senior Center had been a very find facility but was not inadequate. The new plan showed the Senior Center to be 82 of the overall priority, Ms. Lynn Hilbeth, Special Advisory Committee for the Denton Independent School District for handicapped and disabled persons, stated that input from her group had been incorporated by the Parks Department and she appreciated the commitment which had been made by the city. Rlddlesperger motion, Hopkins second to proceed with the development of the plan with the understanding that the plan would be :hanged from time to time to reset priorities, • Brinkman reported that the plan would be reviewed on an anr,u.%I basis. Staff was requesting approval to proceed with the plan and to continue the detail work. City Council Minutes Vestingg of June 9, 1984 Page SIx Council Member Hopkins called the question. Mot ton to prc.,aed carried unanimously, City Manager Hartung reported that the Parks and Rear ea it ion Department had recently received an award for their innova,ive programs, 41 Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing on eligible blight ,sees designations in the city of Denton for the sale of industrial revenue bonds, The Mayor opened the public hearing, William McDonald, Administrative Assistant, spoke In favor stating that the city had participated in the issuance of industrial revenue bonds. Eleven areas hail been designated as eligible blighted areas the at the May 22 Council meeting. Staff had received two nore requests for the designation from developra. The first areas was requested by Mr. Adami and was located at the Smith and Dallas Drive. The proposed development would be office apace and warehouses, The second petitioner was Me, Bancroft for an area located at Fort Worth Drive and Collins Street for office building and small shops. The zoning for this parcel had been approve-.i by Council on May 22, This would be an approximately $3,DOC,d00 project, Council Member Hopkins asked if these areas had not been approved for the eligible blighted area designation on May 22. McDonald responded no, but these areas were adjacent, Mayor Stewart asked if the zoning was commercial, j I McDonald responded the zoning was either commercial or light industrial, No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearirtig, Riddlespergor motion, Hopkins second to declare both locations as eligible blighted areas, Motion carried unanimously, a, The Council held a public hearing on the petiti:rs of Melvin Haisler requesting a change in zoning from agricultural, (A) to the general retail (0R) classification on an approximately 0.8 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of FM 2164 1 5arth Locust) and proposed Loop 288, The Mayor opened the public hearing, Me, Jonita Haisler, property owner, spoke In favor stating that the zoning change was requested because of the extension of the loop, Council Member Stephens asked Ms. Haisler if she lived a: the location. Ms. Haisler responded yes, No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing, David Ellison, Development Review Planner, reported that 2 reply forms had baen mailed with 2 returned in favor and 0 in opposition, This was the first request for development zoning along the r-rth side of the proposed loop. There was no problem with intensity based on the Denton Development 0uide, City Council Minutes Meeting of June 4984 Page Seven Council Member Hopkins asked where the city limits line eras in relation to this property, ElU eon responded 590 feet north, 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from agricultural (A) to the general retail (OR) classification on an approximately 0.8 acre parcel located at the northeast Qul„eC of FM 2164 (North Locust) and proposed Loop 288, The following ordinance was presentedi NO, 84-70 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0,851 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE 'THOMAS TOBY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1288, DENTON COUNTY, TEXASi AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED M REINI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Stephens motion, Hopkins second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," kiddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously, C. The Council hold a public hearing on the pro>posed annexation of approximately 81.44 acres of land beginning at Swisher/Shiloh Road, A-1 . The Mayor opened the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, spoke in favor stating that 2 reply forms had been mailed with 0 returned but the staff had received mail from interested parties who were not within the legal distance for notification, The mapping in the area was fairly limited. Staff was proposing to annex 81.44 acres, A 40 acre mobile '.some subdivision was proposed in the area bounded on the north by Page Road and fronting on Swisher Road, Staff was unsure of the proposed mobile home park on the other side of this parcel. The land was vacant now with a major drainage channel through the property, The council decided not to annex, the property would come under the extra-territorial jurisdiction regulations and would be subject to perimeter paving and drainage improvements, Staff was also concerned about the cost of annexation as these developments do not pay their own way, Annexation would mean that the City of Denton would have the ability to control the ultimate growth in this area, The Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval, Council Member Hopkins asked if the PSZ had considered 3 cost analysis weighing the cost of providing services and the rot-lrn of revenues. Watkir., replied not apeclfically. Council Member Riddlesperger stated that a developer could put anything on the land as long as it met County standards if the area was not in the city limits. If annexed, the city could control chat was developed on the land, air, ,morris Pearson, Chaparral Fatateo, spo'<e in favor stating that he was concerned about what would happen to this property, A a,obile home park was inconsistent and inappropriate with adjacent property which was already developed. • Ms. Judy Russell, Chaparral Estates, spoke in favor stating that she lived across the street from the proposed development and felt that Denton should take firm action in areas such as this. Cityy Council Minutes Meeting of June 5, 1984 Page Eight Mr, John Tinnerello, 2805 Shady Shores Road, spoke in favor stating that the parcel abutted his property on the north side and felt the mobil* home park would be a high density land use. He felt the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should gain control of this property now before too many things were already in place, Mr. Curtis Hogsdon, owner of a portion of the property, spoke in opposition stating that he had never been notified of any P&z or Council meetings. He was in favor of organized annexation to obtain city services as soon as possible, The problem, had been that he had "showed his hand" to the staff prior to developing. Hogsdon stated that the Council wanted to annex in this area it should annex all of the property and not just his, Mr. Hogsdon urged the Council to table this petition until the second meeting in July so it could be considered as s planned development zoning petition, The mayor closed the public hearing, Hopkins 4ntion, Chew second to continue the annexation proceedings. Motion carried unanimously, D, The Council held a public hearing on the roposed annexation of approximately 522,76 acres of land beginning Y50 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of U. S, Highway 380, A-3 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that 9 reply forms had been mailed with 2 returned in opposition and 1 undecided. At the May 22 meeting, the Council had directed staff to delete that portion of the parcel containing Me. Nulkay'a property, An • alternate ordinance had been prepared with this property taken out. An estate type subdivision was on 280 acres of the tract was underway with wells for water. A preliminary plat had been filed. The tract to the south was a proposed 130 acre mobile home subdivision. This annexation would not pay Its own ways however, the impact analysis assumed the area to be fully developed. No one spoke: in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Riddlasperger motion. Alford second to continue the annexation proceedings, Motion carried unanimously, E. The Council held a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 9,013 acres of land beginning approximately 700 feet east of Sherman Drive. A-44 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Charlie Watkins, senior Planner, spoke in favor stating that 2 reply forms had been mailed with 0 returned. This was a voluntary annexation requested by Holloway Corporation as part of an overall zoning request for this area, Mayor Stewart asked what Holloway Corporation was planning to do in this area. Watkins responded this parcel was a community development plan for single family housing. Mr, Calvin Cooper, Holloway Corporation, stated the development would have 4.2 houses per acre with swimming fools and tennis courts. The area was contiguous to the other 1.0 acres in the total parcel. . No one spoke in opposition, city council Minutes Meeting of June 5, 1984 Page Nine The Mayor closed the public hearing, Stephens motion, Hopkins second to continue the annexation proceedings, Motion carried unanimously, g, ordinances A, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings on the proposed annexation of approximately 31,335 acres of land located on the east side of North Locust Street, Asb Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported this parcel was between ,North Locust Street and the Twin Lakes mobile home park, Staff was recommending the first public hearing be held on June 19, the second public hearing be held on July 3 and to institute annexaticn proceedings on July 24, The following ordinance was presenr.edi N0. a4-71 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION O! CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND WTHORI7ING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, McAdams motion, Chew second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance • restricting the parking between the northern most driveway on the west side of I.O.O,F, to the and of the pavement on I.O.O.F. Assistant City Manager Svehla reported that this item had teen considered by the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission. This was a very small area on I.O.O.F and there had been a problem with the distance tetween the driveway and the end of the pavement, Council Member Riddlesperger stated that this was not a through street. The following ordinance was presentedi NO. £34-72 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEIIICL88 04 'THE WEST SIDE OF I.O.O.P. STREET BETWEEN 552 FEET NORTH OP HIGHLAND STREET AND THE END OF PAVE MENTI PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE i PROVIDtNO A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARSI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Riddlesperger motion, Alford second that the ordinance be adopted, On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously, C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the closing and vacating of that portion of Texas Street beginning 125 feet east of Rose Street and ending 170 feet west of 'Rood Street. Assistant City Manager Svehla reported that this was that portion of Texas Street which ran throi%gh the Service Center complex, Although this area was locked at night, traffic did go throucl, here during the day, Staff was proposing to close this section of the street to through traffic. Cityy Council Minutes Meeting of June 5, 1984 Page Ten Mayor Stewart asked if this was a dedicated street, Svehla responded yeel but it was the staff's understanding that there was no formal dedication, The following ordinance was presented) NO, 84-73 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING AND VACATING OF THAT PORTION OF TEXAS STREET BEGINNING 125' EAST OF ROSE STREET AND ENDING 170' WEST OF WOOD STREETI PROVIDING FOR THE REVERSION OF THE F££ TO SAID PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSESt AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Alford motion, Riddlesperger second that the ordinance be adopted. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adeption of an ordinance amending street light pro rata charges. Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that an annual review of pro rata charges had been completed. The city was now using a new type of poles which had raised the cost. The Public Utilities Beard had review and approve the change in pro rata. The following ordinance was present,adr NO. 84-74 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 25 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES . OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, TO PROVIDE FOR REVISED COST FOR STREET LIGHTING SERVICESI REPEALINO ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITHt AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Hopkins second that the ordinance be adopted, On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 6. Resolution A. The Council considered approval of a resolution and accompanying final statement of community development objectives and projected use of funds. E112ateth Evans, Community Development Block Grant Administrator, reported that Denton was now an entitlement city and this waa the final resolution and applica..ion to be forwarded to HUD. Mayor Stewart asked if staff was merely taking requests or had specifics on projects been determined. Evans replied yest however, some specifics had been determined on streets in the projected use of the funds. The following resolution was presented) R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, is concerned with the development of viable urban communities, including decant housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunitiesi and WHEREAS, the City of Denton, has a special concern for persons of Low and moderate incomes and Cityy Council Minutes MooEing of June 5, 1994 Page Eleven WHLREAE, the City of Denton, as an entitlement city, has pre ared through a citizen participation process, a program for utilizing Its first year entitlement funds in the amount of $614,0001 and WHEREAS at public hearing has been held In accordance with laws and WHEREAS, the Act requires an application and appropriate certifioationsl now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASs SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas authorizes the City Manager to sign and submit to the Development of Housing and Urban Development a grant application and appropriate assurancne for entitlement funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1914, as amended, SECTION II, That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas authorizes the City Manager to handle all fiscal and administrative matters related to the application, the Housing Assistance Plan and the assurances required therefore. SECTION Ill. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Development of Housing and Urban Development, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 5th day of June, 1984, RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTS CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETAR APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt C. J, TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY Riddlesparger motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesparger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered approval of a resolution declaring certain areas of the City of Denton as blighted for the purpose of allowing the sale of Industrial Revenue Bonds to improve these aces. William McDonald, Administrative Assistant, reported that this was the formal action to be taken. The public hearing Yad besn held earlier in the meeting. The following resolution was presented, city Council Minutes Meeting of June S, 1984 Page Twelve R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, by Resolution adopted March 4, 1980, by the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, the City of Denton authorized the creation of the City of Denton Industrial Development Authority to exercise the powers of such corporations organized pursuant to the Development Corporation Act of 1919, as amended (the "Aot")r and WHEREAS, the Act together with the Rules for Issuing Industrial Development Bonds promulgated thereunder by the Texas Economic Development Commission (the "RU1e8"), provide for the financing of projects for commercial usesi and WHEREAS, said Act and Rules provide certain procedures with respect to the establishment and designation of Eligible Blighted Areas within the City for the purposes of financing projects for commercial uses and alleviating economically disadvantaged areest NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TFXASi SECTION I. That the areas outlined on the attached maps which are designated boundaries and are further described in Exhibits A and B attached hereto are established and designated as eligible Blighted Areas for the purposes of the Act and the Rules, all being portions of the City. SECTION II. That the City finds that the areas designated herein as Eligible Blighted Areas contain a substantial number of under employed people and substandard or deteriorating structures which impair or arrest the sound growth of the City and are areas that constitute an economic or social liability in their present condition or use. The information attached as Exhibit C further supports the City's decision to designate the areas referenced in Exhibits A and B as eligible Blighted Areas, SECTION III, That the City finds and represents to the Texas Economic Development Commission that the availability of financing of projects for commercial uses under the Act will contribute significantly to the alleviation of the blighted conditions found to exist in the designated Eligible Blighted Areas, SECTION IV, That the principal types of projects for commercial uses desired and authorized by the City to enhance its redevelopment efforts in the Eligible Blighted Areas a:e those projects allowed under the Act and as may be limited by more restrictive policies established by the City of Denton Industrial Development Authority. SECTION V. That the City represents that it will review all project descriptions for approval of specific projects for commercial uses in order to determine whether such projects are consistent with the City's objectives for redevelopment of the Eligible Blighted Areas. SECTION VI, That attached hereto as Exhibit D is a description of proposed public improvenents to be made in the Eligible Blighted Areas, the estimated commencement and approximate SCIW(lLile for such public improvements, and the source of funds the City will use for such purposes, all of which is based on the City's best estimates as of the date of adoption of this resolution. City Council Minutes Meeting of June S, 1984 Page Thirteen SECTION V I I , That this Resolution Ahall take effeat immediately upon its adoption and the City secretary is herely directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Texas Economic Development Commission, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 5th flay of June, 1984, RICKARU Q, STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS A'T'TEST i NA-RI,OTTE IT SC 'AW CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi C. J. TAYLOR, JR., CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Byi Hopkins motion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved. On roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously. 7, The Council considered approval of a request from RPDO, . Inc, for water and sewer service outside the City limits at Page Road and Shiloh Cemetery (southeast of Denton). Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this. was a 66 acre tract on the edge of the proposed annexation. This area would require an 8 inch water line and the Corinth Lift station would provide the sewer service. The Lift station was approximately 909 full. Improvements would have to be made. The Public Utilities Board had reviewed and recommended approval. Council Memter Hopkins stated that tine Council could not refuse the request as the city was obligated to serve in this area, McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the request from RPDO, Inc. for water and sewer service outside of the city limits, Motion carried unanimously, 8, The Council received a report on electric rate demand charges, Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported on demand and revenue expectations stating that staff had expected $11,900,000 from commercial customers and 14,200,000 in fixed costs, The proposal had included 708 base demand charge and 109 in energy charges. Staff anticipated recovering approximately 114,000,000 from demand charges, The percentage on the demand charges was correct and kilowat billings were up approximately 179. Denton lied a 15,10 kilowat charge for all customers. Texas Power and Light had a two level system with an expander block which was a very complicated system. Nelson then presented a slide of the comparison of demand rates from the City of Denton, Texas Power and Light, Dallas Power and Light, and the City of Garland as compiled by the city of Austin. The chart showed the rates in various consumer classes from residential to large industrial. City Council Minutes Meet i;tq of June 4, 1964 • Page Fourteen Mayor Stewart stated that this referred back to the fact that the City of Denton had decided to use the same demand charge for all classes of customers to encourage conservation, Nelson concluded by stating that the ohart showed DP&L on it oid rate and a portion cf TPSL on their old rate, TESL wou d standardize the rater, d, The Council considered authorizing the City Manager to negotiate with the Flow Hospital Administrator concerning an advance of funds to the hospital. City Manager Hartung reported that the Council had discussed ear'.ier the need to make moves to aid the hospital in the Medicare/Medicaid payback, During recent discussions with the County, a legal opinion had been released by the Commissioners Court relating to the responsibility for indigient care, Staff was recommending that the Counoili 1. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate with the Hospital Administrator and City Attorney to develop a contract allowing the city to advance funds to Flow Hospital in the form of a loan 2. The city should retain legal assistance to determine the long range goals and needs of the city in respect to Flow Hospital 3. Direct the City Attorney to pursue a resolution to the question of the County's responsibility for the payment of indigent care. Chew motion, Stephens second to approve all three recommendati.ne, Motion carried unanimously. 11. There was no official action on Executive session it.rms of legal matters, real estate, personnel, or board appointments, 12, New Businesal The following items of new business were suggesr_e-i Ly Council Members for future agandase 1, Council Member Stephens asked about an ordinance or. pro rata street paving of Collins Street in conjunction with the petition of Christopher Bancroft, 2. Council Member Stephens requested a report on the cost of street rupairs and seal coating. 3. Council Member Alford requested a report on the star:os of code enforcement on Rose Lawn Drive. 4, Council Member Hopkins requested a report in the near future on the fire inspection program, The Council adjourned into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. 140 official action was taken, With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned. RICHARD 0, 5 EW ' , DMA 0R =RLUCTE L ,CITY SF~ARY • 1479C City Council Minutes June 8, irJBM Phe Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at IZ 00 noon In the Council Chambers. MEHEERS PRHS8NT; Mayor Stewart, +Iayor Pro Tom Chewl Council Members Alforu, Chow, cMcAdams, and Rlddlesper;er Assistant City Ma nngo rI Assistant City Attorney and City Secrriary MEMBERS ABSENT; Council Members Hopkins and Stephens 1. I'ue Council nold a public hearing on eligible blighted area designations in the city of Denton for tlia sale of industrial revenue bonds. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Itilliam McDonald, ldrninistratlve Assistant, reported that the st,.ff was requesting two more areas be designated as blighted for the purpose of issuig industrial revenue bonds. rho first area lead oeen requested to be included by Council Member Stephens and wns located at the corner of Carroll Boulevard and Eagle the second area was requested by Mr. R. J. Button and was located at Mayhill Road and 1.352. Mr, Button planned a three phase development in this area which would include a minim-mall and would provide approximately 80 jobs ,Mayor Pro 'am Ch,)w stated that he had received many telephone .tills regarding tho word "blighted". Council Nloinber McAdams stated it was her understanding that this phraseology Mould be changed in the state statute. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. 1. The Council considered approval of a resolution declaring certain areas of the City of Denton as blighted for the purpose of allowing the sale of industrial revenue bonds to improve these areas. I'ne following resolution was presauted; R E S O I, U T 1 0 N WHEREAS, by Resolution adopted March 1, 1980, by the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, the City of Denton authorized the creation of the Cliy' of Denton lndustrlal Development Authority to exercise the powers of such corporations organized pursuon: to the Development Corporation Act of 1979, as amended (the 'Act"); and 4HEREAS, the Act togetner with the Rules for issuing Industrial Uevelopment Bonds praeulgated thereunder by the Texas Economic Development Commission (cne "Rules"provide for the financing of projects for commercial uses; and iHEREAS, said Act and Rules provide certain procedures with respect to the establishment and designation of Eligible Alighted Areas dit,) in the City for the purposes of financing project; for commercial uses and alleviating economically disadvantaged areas; Ntlw, THEREFORE, BE IT KESOuVEU BY THE CUUNull. OF THE CITY OF DEN MN , rEXASo SECTION 1. • "That the areas outlined o" the attached maps which are designated boundaries and are further described in Exhibits A and B attacned nereto are estaolIshed and designated as E11,ible Blighted Areas for the purposes of the Act and the RuIus, all being portions of the City, l City Council Alnutes a of tune e, 1981 Page two S C"IVN I1, That the City finds that the areas designated heroin as Ellgiblo 81 lghted Areas contain a substantial number of under employed people and substandard or deteriorating structures which impair or arrest the sound growth of the City and are areas that constitute an economic or social liability in their present condition or use, rho information attached as Exhibit C further supports the City's decision to dosl&hate the areas referenced in bx,t bits A and 8 as Eligible Blighted Areas. SECTION Ill, That the City finds and represents to the Texas Economic Development Commission that the availability of financing of projects for eommorelat uses undor the Act will contribute significantly to toe alleviation of the blighted conditions found to exist In the designated Eligible ti:ighted Areas, SEC1'lUN Iv, That the principal types of projects for commercial uses desired and authorized by the City to enhance its redevelo ment efforts In the Eligible Blighted Areas are those projects allowed under the Act and as may be limited by more restrictive policies established by the City of Denton Industrial Development Authority, SECTION V. Chat the City represents that it will review all project ddzcriptions for appr:val of specific projects for commercial uses in order to determine whether such projects ire consistent with the City's objectives for redevelopment of the Eligible Blighted Areas, SBC'f10N N1, That attached neroto as Exhibit D is a do scription of proposed public improvoinenti to be made in the Eligible flighted Areas, the estimated coramsw:ement and approximate schedule for such public improvements, and the source of funds the City will use for such purposes, all of which is eased on the City's best estimates as of the date of adoption of this resolutioh, 5ECTION Vi1, That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and the City Secretary Is itereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Texas Economic Development Commission, PASSED ANQ APPROVED this thn 8th day of June, 1984, K I CHART-T-79 l $Ni~iTf , 706-R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; CHAROTTE ALLEN, CITY bhuKl~;IA CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPR01'E0 AS 1'0 LEUAL FOR?I; C. J. TAYLOR, JR,, CIfY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEwfON, TEXAS fYt City Council Minutes liaeting of June 8, 1964 Page TitCOe Chew notion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved, On roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Alto rd "aye," Riddlnsporger "aye," Chew "aye," and M4yor Stewort "aye," Motion carrled Unanimously, With no further business, the nesting was adjourned, RICHARD 0, STSWARr. MAYOR CHARLOTTE Lb,, ci S AY 1480C , CITY COUNCIL MIM ES June, 19, 1984 The Council co nvyned into study session at 5;10 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room, HHMBHRS PRESHOTI Mayor Stewart; Idayor Pro Tent Chews Council Members Alford, Kidd Iasperger, Stephens, McAdams, and Hopkins City Managers City Attorney and Deputy City Secretary ASSOrt None inc. to asssist Council CitysCouncil employment ldevmeloping long ftsu It nfor Plow Hospital. City Manager Chris Hartung stated that lie felt the need for a third party to Help assist in the development of the long range plan, He introduced Steve Clayton. Steve Clayton, representing Medical Consultants, Inc., suggested doing a survey of physicians to find out if their needs were being met by Plow hospital and if there was proper staffing as the physicians really control the hospital, Council Member R1Jdlespergor asked what would be the benefit of the survey, Clayton responded that it show people of the interest in Flow Hospital and It would show First re xas Modlcal, Inc. that some action is bean; taken. Council Member Alford asked how long the survey would take. Clayton said that it would take about 30 Jays to put a questionnaire together and tnat he tiould work with Jeff Hausler and then 30 days beyond that to put the answers together for presentation to Council. Mayor Stewart asked how muen this service wuuld cost, Clayton said that he charges 375,00 per hour but he felt the whole survey and response would cost less than $10,600.00. Council Member Riddlesperger asked If the questionnaire could also lead to ideas on improvement. Clayton stated that the questionnaire would have both objective and subjective questions. Mayor Stewart stated that the Council needed to know what needed to oe done to make the hospital successful. Clayton said that no would work as in extension of the hospital. Mayor Pro rem cnew suggested getting another proposal so they could make a comparison. Council Member Stephens asked what Taylor Hospital was doing and could tney do the same sort of thing. Mayor Stewart said that getting someone Independent was the general idea. city Manager Hartung stated that this is strictly City business. Council Member Hopkins stated that we own the 'tospital and that we must make the major decisions. Mayor Pro rem Cnew again suggested getting another proposal so they could make a comparison. Mayor Stewart said that it needs to be done relatively quickly. Hartung said he would get some other firms to present to the Council so that they Could make a Comparison. afoetlnti of Juneul9Y 1984c11 Mlntues Page Two The Council considered an agreement with Plow Hospital for assistance in funding of the atedtcarelMedicaid reimbursement, at the meeting to discusls n the r reHartng imbursemnstated and t Rat t 33Y Hauslor questions , Jeff Hausier, Administrator of Plow Hospital, stated the Council had the opportunity to finance additional reimbursements, Additional banking sources were available and that there was an option of reimbursement to Medlcare/Medicaid and Blue Cross/Blue Shield with only a IZ month referral, He stated that Plow needed the flexibility of 3 years, The City could execute the advance of funds, City Manager Hartung stated that the County Commissioners were planning on discussing the nospital funding on June 10 and that Judge Cole had indicated lie felt the County would assurae their share of responsibiltty, Hartung to stated ur herh when theyr calling a ai betterpidealof awhat discuss this Council the County was going to do. Council %lember Riddiesperger asked if the City was assuming the responsibility for funding half of what was still to be paid, assuming about n$1150,000, debt was apprximately J300,000 and the responded that needed some form of formal action as there was no contract at the present time, mayor Stewart asked if cash flow was the problem and would the nospital need sore or less than the JIS0,000, Jeff Hausler answered probably more but hopefully it could be repaid witn the tares years or less, Mayor Stewart asked now serious the casn flow problem was, Jeff Hausler stated that the cash flow problem has been turned around, out was not good yet, Ae said that this was a better year, uut still not great and that my needed to borrow the full amount so it can be spread out over 3 years, Council Member Riddlesperger stated that flexibility was the key, CounclI Member Hopkins suggested that the Council authorise the City Manager to negotiate a contract to get outside assistance. The Council wished to con U nue to negotiate with the County and the nospital, Hopkins also requast,3d City Attorney to advise the Council of the legalities. 3, The Council held a study session on the proposed sign ordinance, Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, stated tnat the Planning and Zoning Commission nad been working on the sign ordinance for two years, rwo public hearings and be held and many changes made, the P&1W voted 6 - 0 to recommend approval of the ordinance. The process began with staff members touring the city. A study was then completed on the existing sign ordinance, The purpose was to correct any ieflclencies In the current ordinance and to have an ordinance which could be enforced, 1'ne regulations on signs would oe divided Into residential and non-residential ordinances Council Member Stephens asked if the Board nad gotten input from the sign people of Denton in working out our own ideas. City of Denton Clty Council Hlntues 14eeting of June l9, 1984 Page Three Watkins stated that Planning 9 toning had not gone outside the committee for negotiations, but rather nod made their own decisions, Council Member Stephens asked if the Board had gotten input from the people who would be affected by the ordinance, Council ,Member McAdams stated that comments were received from sign entities and that tae feeling of the sign industry were made clear, Gary Juren, Planning 8 toning Commission, stated that he felt comfortable with the document and that the city needed these regulations, Council Member Riddlesperger asked if all protable signs would be outlawed after i years, Watkins said portable signs would not be outlawed, but off premises signs would be. Raymond G0410, owner of an advertising business, stated he dealt with btllboards felt the amortization was unfair, All signs that were ouilt legally at the time and had permits should stay as they were, He furtner stated that some of his signs would be non- conforming In 10 years, lie concluded oy stating that half of his signs kaoout 10 signs along the Highway) are covered under the beautification Act, Larry Brockett, Starlight Signs, stated that a many of his CU stome rs'9 signs would ')ecome non conforming and that he fact to years was not enough time, He also stated he felt the ordinance was unfair to people who nad purchased permits and were conforming at the time, tie suggested that those signs over 40' high be protected under a grandfather clause. Watkins responded that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation did not include a grandfather clause, Those people wno could not conform within the 10 year period could petition for an extension from the Board of Adjustment. Mayor Stewart asked about historic landmarks, such as the Morrison Milling sign, Watkins replied that would be an issue for the Historic Landmark Commission to decide, Cliff Redding, owner of a sign company, stated If believes the ordinance was confusing and asked how a sign could change from being legal to being Illegal, lie stated that one set standard was not fair and that the people who would be most affected by the ordinance had not given enough Input or enough time to attend the meetings. The Council asked for those i,iterested in giving some information to put those recommendations In their boxes for their review, d. the Louncil convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No otticlal action was taken, lh,j Council then convened into the regular meeting at 7:00 p.a. in t?~ Council Chambers, PRI'SEN'r: Mayor Stewart; ?Mayor Pro Tern Chew; Council Members Alford, Riddlesperger, Stephens, McAdams, and Hopkins city Manager, City Attorney and Deputy City Secretary 1. Consent Agenda Council Member Stephens requested item A-1 oe removed ftom the consent agenda. City of Denton city council Mintues Meeting of June 19, 1984 Page Four slayor Pro Tom Chow requested item B•4 be roisoved from the consent agenda, Stephens motion lopkins second to 4g rovo the Consent Agenda excepting items 1.1 and B-4. Motion carried unanimously, 04vid Ellison, uoveloppment Review Planner, reported on item B,4 (preliminary plat of the Morse Street Addition) stating that he was familiar with the area, but that staff needed to investigate the area further. Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that a curve in the plat area was difficult to navigate and asked for a report from En lnsering at the meeting on July 3 1984, Chow also asked the staff to look at Scott Street again and 3etermirte who would pay for the widening. Ellison stated that he felt confident that 2 weeks was sufficient time to got the Information, Chew motion, Stephens second to have this item brought back in two weeks. Motion passed unanimously, Consent Agenda; A. Bids and Purchase Orders; 1. Bid r 92ob - Bast Prairie paving improvements 2. 3ld 0 9292 - Controller terminals, replacement keypads and terminal printers 3. Bid 0 9291 • Transmission poles 41 Bid 0 9296 • Fire Department windbreakers 5, Purchase Order Y 62529 to G. R. Haley Company in the amount of $3,193.27 B. Plats and Replats: 1. Consider approval of the preliminary replat of the Maywood-Jester Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 2. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Patio Gardens Homes Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 31 Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Mack Center Addition, (The Planning and Tuning Commtsslo!t recommends approval,) 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of. the Morse Street Addition, ('rhe Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) The Mayor read a proclamation declaring July 4, 1984 as a holiday, t, The Council received a report from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the recormendation for the Vivo Year Capital Improvement Plan. I Rube;t 4aForte, Chairman of the P4Z, reported there were $50,000,000 ..ovth of programs from whicn to choose. The biggest needs were for drainage improvements and work on streets and traffic signals. He stated tnat the Council might consid-ir a bond election for improve- ments to roads since there was a neoo for 330,000,000 worth of road improvements, Q1ty of Denton City Council NIlntues Noatinlill of June 19, 1984 Page Nive Council Member McAdams asked if the area of town where houses always flood was taken care of in the drainage needs. LaPorte replied yes. Bob Nelson reported that there were CIP pproieccs over the next five years watch would amount to 45,000,000. 'these projocts would require bond sales in the amount of $46,000,000. The CEP was pro}acted on a 4% per year electrical usage growth and 3 1/21 water usage growth rate, li growth was greater, the CIP would have to be adjusted in the next few years. He presented scheduled indicating debt service requirements necessary to fund bond sales to support the capital improvements. Council Member Hopkins suggested the Council have a joint work session with the Public Utilities Board to discuss the expenditures for PY 1984.85. 3. 4s. Carolyn Cushman appeared requesting permission to install storage shads on l acre of an 8 acre tract, ?is, cusnman stated that her property was located at Loop 189 and Spencer Road and that nor request for a skating rink had been denied because of the lack of water and sewer, She requested permission to build all steel storage buildings, 30' from the property line, She had spoken with the Building Official who had no problems, but the Fire Marsnal indicated there would be a problem because of the water situation. She stated that there were families Living out there affected by the same lack of water and that the storage buildings she was requesting would not nave any Impact on numan lives. the Council referred the question of whother or not she could huild mint-warehouses to the City Attorney. The City Attorney was directed to work with Ms. Cushman. 4, the Council considered authorizing the Confederate Air Force to use Denton Municipal Airport for an airsnow on July II and is, 1984. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.) Dill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported that this agreement between the City and the Confederate Air Force wait basically the same as in past years, There was a fee increase anc the city would be providing additional resources. The CAF was also requesting to sell beer as they had in the past. Council Member Stephens stated that after last year's show some citizens were concerned that the planes were flying too low. He asked to make sure that the proper altitudes were observed, iton Cox from cue Confederate Air Force said that minimum and 7aximun altitudes were set and monitored by FAA regulations. Riddlesperger motion, Stephens second to approve use of the Airport for Air Show. Motion passed unanimously, S. Public Ilea rIngs A. The Council held a public hearing on the proposed a;,nexation of approximately 9,015 acres of land beginning approxi• mately 700 feet east of Sherman Drive (A•4), the Niaycr opened the public nearing. Bill Dyer, representative of the Robert Holloway Corporation, spoke in favor of the annexation, He stated that the corporation was ready to proceed with plans for the zoning change. is No one spoke in opposition City of Vinton City Qouncil MLintues Meeting of June 19, 1984 Page Six The Mayor closed the public hearing, Charlie Watkins, Senior Planner, reported that 2 reply forms Were mailed with U returned, N, The Council held a public hearing on the proposed annexation of approximately 31.33$ acres of land located between HZ164 (North Locust Street) and Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park (o-s), The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor of the annexation, No one spoke In opposition of the annexation, fhe Mayor closed the public hearing, Charlie rlatklns stated that tnls was a voluntary annexation request for toning for a mobile home park, C. Council held a hearing on the petition of Moreile M, Miller requesting a change in coning from single family (SP-1) to the light industrial (LI) classlficatlon on an approximately 2,32 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Morse and Woodrow Streets (1314 Morse Street), alorelle M, Miller spoke in favor of the request stating that the owners wanted to sell the land to pay hospital bills, She stated that their need was great and that the Light Industrial coning was the best use for the land, Site stated that the land was not suitable for single family use and that she had someone interested in buying the land for light Industrial use, I Dorothy Mentor spoke in opposition to the coning request. She said that this was a single family neighbornood and that there was already too much lignt industrial usage in the area, She asked the Council not to be hasty in making a decision and that people who ilad chosen that area for their !tomes should not have to deal with the industrial development in their area, She strongly opposed the coning request, Ms. Miller spoke In rebuttal stating that the land was far enough away from tare neighbors not to be a problem and that they could build at n fences to separate the area, She also said that the owners of the land wore destitute and the land was not suitable for single family use, The Mayor closed the public hearing, David Ellison stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial and that there are other alternatives to Light industrial coning. He also stated that the Denton Development Plan works to preserve residential neighborhoods. Council Member McAdams spoke in favor of perseving the neighbor- hood. Sne stated that was the most important factor. McAdams motion to deny request, Chew second. Motion passed unanimously. D. -1060. this is the petition of Dimension Development Company, Inc, requesting a change in coning from planned development (PD•19) and single family (SP-10) to a revised planned development classification on IUI.7 acres beginning at the intersection of Ioasley Lane dnd Ridgeway Drive. Existing PD-19 is comprised of 42.11 net acres (lo.i acres of general retail, lo.7 acres of cluster housing at 11 twits per acre, and 15 acres of multi-family at 26 units per acre). the balance of the Ibl.7 acre tract (119.3 acres) IS presently zoned to accommodate single family detached land use on minimum 10,000 square foot lots, if approved, the revised or newly established pianned development (PU) will permit the following land uses; City of Uenton city council Mintues Meeting of June 19, 19a4 Page Seven 1. A reconfiguration of existing PU,19 to the east side of Ridgeway Drive to respect a new alignment, The 10,s net acres of oneral retail Is the same as existing PD•19, Multi family on lo.? net acres (maximum of 390 units is the same number of maximum units as existing PD•19,) cluster housing nas been reduced Crow 12 units per acre in existing PD-19 to 8 units per acre in the proposed revised PD and relocated to the south boundary of the tract, 2. Single family (SP-10) on 14.44 acres beginning adjacent and west of Ridgeway Drive, 31 Single family (SP-10) on 30.49 acre parcel located east of Ridgeway Drive along the northern boundary of the site, 4. Single family (SP•?) on 3S acres beginning approximately 1,400 feet east of Ridgeway Drive, 5. Cluster housing on 28,89 acres at 11 units per acre (318 maximum units) beginning approximately 2,300 feet east of Ridgeway Drive. c. Office use on 4,68 acres located at the northwest corner of Teasley Lane and Ridgeway Drive. 7. City service use (potential fire station site) on a 1.55 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Ridgeway Drive and Teasley lane, 3. Proposed public park land use on 2,3 acres. Bob Wachtel from Ulmension Development spoke in favor of the petition stating that the proposal was a culmination of 6 months work. His company had spoken with people living all around the area and had tried to take advantage of the best use of the land as well as keep the area pleasant for all surrouuding areas, Mr. 4, P. Pnilllps, representing Mr, and Mrs, Jerry Cott, spoke in favor stating tits Cotts were supportive of the proposition but that they would prefer the IU,S acres of general retail be used as nelgnbornood services instead of general retail, This would give no store more than 4,000 square feet, ,NO one spoke to opposition, The Mayor closed the public Hearing, Uavid glllson spoke, saying that 11 reply forms were mailed, 1 was returned in favor, 0 were returned in opposition, He stated that Planning 4 Zoning were In support of the development and they had recommended approval, Council Member Riddlesperger said that he was vary pleased with the professional approach taken by Dimension Development and said they were a good example for all other developers. McAdams motion to approve request with the exception of M3 and 06 (Single family (SP•101 on 30.49 acre parcel located east of Ridgeway Drive along the northern boundary of the site ahd office use on 4,68 acres located at the northwest corner of Teasley Lane and Ridgeway Urive phew second, A discussion ensued concerning whether or not to leave in items 03 and 40, Stephens motion, Riddlesperger second to accept the entire petition. Motion failed with 3 voting aye, 4 voting no. McAdams motion to accept petition deleting items 43 and k6, Chew second. Motion passed- o ayes and t no. Gity of uenton City council Mintuss Meetlnit of June 19, 1984 Page Bight • q, The Council considered aoning change request Z-16ol. The Mayor opened tae Public Hearing. George liopkins spoko in favor of the request stating that the area was suitable for light industrial development, No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closea the Public Hearing, David Ellison spoke stating that 8 reply Earns were mailed, 4 were returned in favor, 0 returned in opposition, Hopkins motion, Stephens second to approve the zoning change request, Motion passed unanimously. F. The Council considered zoning change request 4.1644, Cho Mayor opened the Public Hearing, George tlopkins spoke in favor of the request stating that the area was suitable for light industrial development, No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the Puollc Hearing, David Ellison spoke stating that 6 reply forms were mailed out, 1 were returned in favor, 0 returned in opposition. He also stated that the water and sewer were in the planning stages to be extended, Hopkins motion, Chew second to approve the zoning change request. Motion passed unanimously. G. Th, Council considered zoning change request 2.1664, The Mayor opened the Public Hearing, Bill Rogers Uoveloper of Solar Way Subdivision passed out completed plats, He stated that the community oegan before being annexed into the city limits and they need the zoning change to continue selling the remaining lots. W.P. Phillips spoke in favor of the development saying that the lots are larger than some lit Sw,tnridga, if they have to replat they will have to put In paving and drainage, This is actually a nonconforming land use. Al Stewart spoke in favor of the request stating that ~e had 'beef refused a building permit and was ready to start g everything could be approved. 40 0110 spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing. uavid Ellison spoke stating that 10 reply forms were mailod out, 1 was returned in favor and 1 was returned in opposition. He also stated tiiat the planning and Zon!.ng Commission does not see this as a problem. Riddlesperger motion, Hopkins second, to approve the zoning change request, Mation passed unanimously, 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a mange in zoning from agricultural (A) to the single Way Solar ion,S60cbtlionclassification 30,0Solarlots Way Additions Section 11, Addit City of Ugnton City Council Mintues Maetln of June 14, 1984 Page Vtne • the iollowtng ordinance was presentedl NU. 34.73 AN ORDINANCE ArIENUtNU THE ZONMU :LAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SANE WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX 1'0 THE CUDti OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DOMN, TEXAS, 01' ORDINANCE ,NO, 69 1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO LO'T'S 1, 13, 14 AND I$ OF SOLAR WAY ADDITION, SECTION I AND LOT 5O OF SOLAR HAY ADDITION, SECTION 11, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARrICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Stephens motion, Caew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote McAdams "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye", Alford "aye", Rlddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "ayell, Motion carried unanimously, 6, ordinances A. rlfe Council considered adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings regarding the pettion of Mr. k.-J. Button for annexation of approximately 11 acres of land located at the interyectfon of 1.35E and Mayhill Road (A•G), The following ordinance was presented: NO, 34.76 AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE UN THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, Aol) AUTHORIZING ANU DIRECTING THE MAYGR 'TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, 'The dates were set as July 3, 1984 and July 11, 1984. Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote McAdams "aye", Hopkins "aye", stspliens "aye", Alford "aye", Kiddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", and Mayor Stewart 113)'e", Notion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinanco approving a change in zoning from single family (SP-7) to the planned development 1PD) classification on an approximately 8,74 acre tract beginning at the southwest corner of Highway 377 and Collins Street (i•1649), The following ordinance was presented: NO. 34•'17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONINU MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED Ai AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF 'rHE CITY OF DENTO,N, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXLIATELY 8,74 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE ALEXANDER HILT. SURVEY, ABSTRACT 40. 643, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HERSIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE UATB, Hopkins motion, Stepnens second to adopt tho ordinance. Oh roll Cali vote McAdams 1laye1', Hopkins "aye", Staphelis "aye", Alford "aye", Rlddlesperger "aye", Cnew "aye", and Mayor Stewart "aye", Motion carried 1:nanlmously, C. rhe Council CunsiJered ad6yi!On of an ordinance prohibiting parking on the east side of Mesa give Rick Svenla, Assistant City Manager gave j repurc stating that this area has been a problem for some time and that the Traffic Engineering Division has had conplalnts from citizens concerning the parking on Mesa Drive. City of Denton City Court0l ,Hintues Meeting of June 14, 1944 Page 'fen fhe following ordinance was prasenteJi NO. 84.18 m ORDINANCE PROH181TING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE S.t,ST SIDE OF MH$A DRIVE PROD; ITS INTURS11CTION WirH U. S. HIOHWAY bge rO END OF PAV6MENT1 PROVIDINO A SEVERA816ITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED fWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Hopkins motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance, On roll _all vote McAdams "aye", Hopkins "aye", Stephens "aye1. Alford Riddlesperger "aye", Chew "aye", an.. Stewart "aye". Iot<on ,arried unanimously, 71 Consider removing tuning request S•174 from the table. Ghdw mutton, Riddlesperger second, Motion passed unanimously, 8. S• 14 This is the petition of Champion Home Communities, :tic, request ng approval of a specific use permit for a t4obile home ;:•rrk on a 104.28 acre tract located adjacent and north of FM i:5 (East McKinney) and adjacent and south of Mills Road, and bagia:xng approximately 1,000 feet east of Mayhill (load. David Ellison gave a report stating chat a public hearing had aeon held and the request was to amend the zoning map. The Piannil; S Zoning Commission approved the request by a vote of 4.2. Ilopkins motion, Chew second. Motion carried with 4 voting "ave" And 3 voting "nay". 9. Consider removing zoning request S•176 from the table. Cnew motion, McAdams sec;oud, motion passed unanimously. 10. S-17o This is the petition of W. J. Roddy requesting appracal of a specific use permit for a mobile home park (197 lots a typical site of 50' x 1001) on a 36.96 acre tract 10aA..-d approximately 3,SUU fbet east of the 1.356 service road and ad;a,:ent and north of Page Road, David Ellison spoke stating that there was already an existing mobile home park in the area and that this one would have to toafarm to existing spe, Ificatlons and would have to show individual lets. He stated that there had been a public hearing, Mary Stewart spoke In oppposition to the park. She stated that Mr, Roddy already owned a mobllo none park and tnat it was in a very sad state of disrepair. Soo said there was Improper plastic pipe ender the road, that the ditch nad uocome a cesspool and that the par+. was covered with debris and junk vehicles. She said that the parr had been turned into the Heaitit Department for code violations. Ur. Brant Romeo spoke in favor of the park. H: stated that tie ras actually the owner of the property and that tits intent was to oa„e a clean, "Christian' community, striving for moral excellence. He said tie intends to ouuld ;t chapel and gnat he would exceed the requirements of the park. Council Member Riddlesperger asked if lie would live on the prope;t>•. Dr. nomoo safe uo, tie would not live there, Cnew motion., Hopkins so,:ond to deny the petition. Motion ;asked unanimously.. City of Denton City Council ,Mtntuos Meetin of June 19, 1984 Page Eleven It, Consldor removing disposition request D.3s from the table. Chew notion, Alford second, motion passed unanimously, 12, D-y5~~ Consider approval of disposition of excess Carroll Boulevvart right -of way at the southeast corner of West Prairie and Carroll Boulevard. David ELILson spoke stating that Planning and Zoning Commission had approved the disposition by a vote of o•1. He also said that the city has control of the right-of-way deed on the east line of Center street, lbm Jester spoke sa,Ino that the real Issue was an ownership quostIon, What did tni city actually purchase? He stated that the city still owns 10' of the area. Steve artakman, Parks and Recreation Director stated that the Parks Master Plan suggested not disposing of any property on Carrot' Boulevard and suggested holding onto the land, Chew motion, Hopkins second to approve disposition and retain 101, Motion passed with S voting "aye" and 2 voting "nay", l3, Consider the North Texas State University 19814.85 parking Nnd traffic proposals. Rick SvahIa, Assistant City Manager spoke stating that there were three proposals submitted by North exas State University. The bisic request was for a bicycle path around the campus. Staff felt the proposal was acceptable with the exception of Watch Street, the recommendation was that representatives from North Texas meet with staff to determine wnicn streets should have the parking romoved, the bicycle path would be initiated only If all problems with merchants and parking spaces could be resolved, Dr, Fred Poole from North texas gave a brief explanation of what the university was trying to do in the way of making the campus more easily a(;essible for the students, tie said that he and Dan Martlh, Polies Cr, ai would work with city staff in any way possible. it id,il9speryer motion, Alford second to approve the concept of tits bIcy.~e pain, %lotion passed unanimously, 14, "onsidsr authorizing the Airport manager to apply for an FAA grant ,`or a master plan study for the airport, Bill Angelo spoke In favor of the request stating that funds were avallaole and that it would oe of benefit to the Municipal Airport. Stephens motion, Chew second to approve request, Motion passed unanimously, 15. There was ao official action on 6Yocutive Session Items of legal matters, real estate, personuol, o- bo..trd appointments, Lb. The following items of new business ware suggested for future agendas; 1. A report on the bird control program 2. A joint meeting with the PuuLic Utilities Board 3, A request was made for a map with mobile home parks marked 4. A report on 8.33 on South Carroll Boulevard City of uonton Vlty Council Mintues Reeking of •Junb 19, 1984 Page twelve Thn Council convened Into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appotntwents, No official action was taken, Nitn no further business, the meeting was Ad)ourned, KICKARI) 0, ,NATOT- JUAN J, UHPUTY L • 1481C CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING; September 4, 1984 COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM N; Consent Agenda SUBJECT; BID N 9315 BENTONITE SLURRY CUTOFF WALL SUMMARY; This bid is for the purchase of a bentonite slurry wall to be constructed around the new landfill, The wall was designed by HDR TECHSERV, Rone Engineering, and the City of Denton staff, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council and award of bid, SOURCE OF FUNDS; Special project funds for construction of the new landfill, RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Geo-Con, Inc, in the amount of $97,300,00, EXHIBITS; Tabulation sheet Memo - Bill Angelo Memo - HDR TECHCERV, Inc, SUBMITTED BY; t Tom D. Shaw, C,P.M, Assistant Purchafing Agent 1 i i ~xa N 9315 DID BENTONITF SLURRY CUTOFF WAIL GEO-CON BENCOR CASE AMERICAN OPEN- 8/23/84 _ 2,00 p.m,_ INC, Internati nal Foundation ACCOUNT N Company Inc, _ ^t T VM ) -V wi . O ) n T TERWR VTNpd 1.39 TOTAL PRICE 97.1304 -126 X000 _ - j831286__ 5% Bid Bond Enclosed __yqe es.__. CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM To: The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works DATE= August 29, 1984 SUBJECT: BID #9315 - [IENTONITB SLURRY CUTOFF WALL As you know, we recently received bids for the construction of the Bentonite Slurry Cutoff Wall for the new landfill, Of the three bids received, the low bid was offered by Geo-Con, Inc, at a price of $97000. The second low bid was offered by Ben-Car Corporation at $126,004, and the high bid was submitted by Case International Company at $183,286. Upon reviewing the credentials of these firms, we feel that al), of the bidders are capable of performing this work. Due to the bid price . offered from Geo-Con, Inc., we would recommend that the bid be awarded to this firm as their bid represents the lowest and best bid. The attached letter from Risa Fisher, from HDR, supports our recommendation in this matter. Should you have any comments or questions, please let us know, Sincerely, Bill Angelo BA/sc sw2 Attachments: Letter from HDR Tab Sheet D August 28, 1984 Mr. 8111 Angelo Public Works Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Soil-bentonite slurry cutoff wall for landfill Dear Mr. Angelo: Regarding the recent bid opening for construction of the referenced slurry wall, we understand that Geo-Con, Inc. submitted the low bid, This is to inform you that HDR recognizes Geo-Con, Inc. as an experienced firm in the field of slurry wall construction. We look forward to working with them on the upcoming project. Sincerely, HOR TECHSERV, INC. Risa W. Fisher Project Manager RWF:pp Aio,rarldwa ) 7 AVentA AueGn i Charlotte i ago 1I 3b 1 %ver. 1 HOUil ton Norfolk Omohe rter15ecoia Phoenx Siinta Doi )w,o S~atUe CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF' MEETING; September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA'. ITEM Consent Agenda `;418JECT; BID N 9318 TRAF'F'IC POLES & SIGNAL LIGHTS SUMMARY; This bid is for equipment necessary for the completion of signals, etc, on Lillian Miller Drive. We sent out bids to nine prospective vendors and received only two bids. The only bidder bidding the complete package was Traffic Signal, as shown on the tabulation sheet. However, this controller is not compatible to the others that we have installed ana cannot be used at this location, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS; Account #432-002-0012-9105 RECO14MENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded for a compatible unit controller on item one with low bids on items 2, 7, and 8 to Consolidated Traffic Controls for a total of $9,972.00. Then award items 3, 49 5, and 6 to Traffic Signal Equipment Corporation, Inc. for a total of $10,685.00, All are awarded to the low bidder except for item 15 which is awarded to the only bidder bidding compatable equipment that can be used on the system at Colorado and Loop 288. Delivery on all items is 30 to 90 days from factory. EXHIBIT: Tabulation sheet SUBMITTED BY; - / Jahn J. f~arsh`all•, C.P,b1, Purchasing Agent BID AID---- --TMEEK-Mu.4 I1-%aL4.[~al ~ Traffic Consol i- Traffic & OPEN 8/14/84 2,00 Signal dated Trans, Sup ly p_ S i gna 1 Inc, ACCOUNT ' 0 432.002-0012-9105 R' P S ffy fTO - DOR -79N OR ENDOR D V OR Wit; N 1 1 1880 Controller 4790,00 8825,00 - Ng 2 3500 f Loop Wire 1986,2r ^M 455,00 18 Gold Flex 657,00 975.00 4 8 GOld.Flex Liquid 196,00 286.00 5 2 Poles 4700,00 N8 6 2 _ Poles - 5132,00 Ng 7 10 Clamp Kits 646,00 692,00 8 10 Arm Kits, 696,00 inc----i 60-90 da 30-90 da 1 10~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF 11IEETINclt September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Ot Consent SUBJECTi Bid # 9319 dieter Maintenance SUNIMAR'Y't This bid Is for the maintenance of meters, etc, at the wastewater Treatment Plant, We sent several bids to vendors and received four bids, The Wastewater Treat- ment Plant has spent considerable time evaluating these bids. Their recommendations tyre attached, You will note that two bids are conolderably higher than the other two, Therefore, ovaluatinn was difficult. ACTION REQUIREDt Approval by Council. SOURCE OF FUNDSt Budget 620-008-0470-8338 RECOMi1IENDATIONt We recommend with Robert King of the Utilities Department, Wastewater Division, that this bid be awarded to what we consider to be the lowest and best bid for the meter maintenance for one year to moncon at $ 15,900,00, 'Phis bid Is higher than the low bid from Fischer do Porter at $14,016,00, however Mr. King feels that Moncon is the best bid at the higher price. See attached memo. LXIIIBITSi Tabulation sheet Memo - Robert King SUBMITTED BYt y0 Purcha,singrAgen't C. P. ~rl. • 1 r alvroN, raXAS rEPA OF tfi mossmom Tos John Marshall, Purchasing Agent Fromi Robert King, Wastewater Treatment Superintendent Dates August 23, 1984 Sub,: Award of Bid 49319 After due consideration of the four vendor bids for the Wastewater Treatment Division's annual meter maintenance con- tract (Bid 49319), I would like to recommend awarding the contract to Moncon, Inc. Whereas Moncon was some $1884 above the low bid this recommendation is based in their greater ability to effectively perform the specified maintenance services, and in their exemplary record of contract perform- ance for the City of Denton. The technical personnel who installed, calibrated and started up the metering and instrumentation at the Pecan Creek facility were originally employed with the instrumentation subcontractor for the 1984-1983 plant renovation. During, and since, completion of the renovation the same technical staff has been absorbed by Moncon, making them cognizant of our facility's metering/instrumentation and more competent at executing the maintenance requirements. Additionally, Moncon has performed similar start up, calibration and corrective maintenance for the City at the recently completed Hickory Creek lift station. Moncon exceeded contractual obligations to the City on that project by perform- ing well beyond the specified warranty repair period, They have gone beyond minimal requirements in explanation of instru- mentation operation to City staff, affecting repair and correct- ive maintenance, and in emergency service call outs--all at no cost to the City. Robert King, Supe ntendent, Wastewater Treatment Division Enc: (1) cc: David Ham, Assistant Director of Utilities File IiIU TITLE _M11 'CE 1~1.Q~T1' rl AlONCON FISCHER Rill) TEXAS JOHNSON q 200 t, INC, Hnd CONTROLS, CONTHOl S t)NFNRb 1? J ? PORTER INC. .1C(:OU\T 0 820-008-0470-8335 "_..'xT% OT -,[.T'F:~)Is(I;_lP'1'.Eov _T VI N1)0 _ ~V1lvlmt~ VIiNpOk ___;:NpOEt VF:NO k V[.NOOIt VIiNDC)It I tl o Rioter A1Hintonance 1b,4)I10 14,1118 28,740 285200 t CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP S41MARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: Spetember 4, 1984 COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM N: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: BID# 9320 HYDRAULIC AUGER SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a Hydraulic Aguer for use with our Powgr Dolly used in the Electric Distribution Depar':tr(ant. This unit is a piece of optional equipment, which can be used to a great advantage by our Eloctric Distribution Department. We sent this out to several machinery vendors of this type of equipment, but as expected there is only one dealer in this area, so we recieved only one bid, • ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS: #610-008-0252-9232 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder, Commercial Body Company for the amount of $49275.00, which includes a storage bracket for the auger. EXHIBIT: Tabulation sheet SUBMITTED BY: John Marshall, .P.M. Purchasing Agent BID I _ OIO___±YD ]~-~ugER COMM6RCiAl BODY OPEN 8121ZQ4 Om CORPORAT I ACCOUNT 1 610,008.0252-9232 i~c 't'ti~3 - 'VEW) t~"--, , )oa " Jadfl O 1 1 Hydraulic Auger 41276.00 with Bracket • CITY COUNCIL AOENDA BACK-UP SUMOWRY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AOENDA ITEM SUBJECT; SID #9321 PADLOCKS SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of brass body padlocks i'or use by the Electric Distribution Department, to secure padmount transformer covers, power closure pedistals and various high voltage switches. These looks are brass to help eliminate rust and corrosion, They are all keyed alike to avoid key loss and lock destructior, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1983-64 Budget Account Number 610-008-0252-8'34 Electric Distribution Transformer Maintenance RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of American Locksmith in the amount of $3.85 each for a total of $3,080.00 Fob Denton with delivery !.n 77 days. EXHIBIT: -T@bulatiooR Sheet SUBMITTED BY: ~~;C Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent R I D fs [ u "r t Cl, -_~'L!l?I_q AMERICAN [AURA'S LOCI(SMITH LOCKSMITH t►!'~NF:n -August 2L~ 1984- _2 p,m, CO. SHOP ACCOUNT N VHNU0ft--- -VLNPOR - VFNWR 11 NIx)R 1 800 Mod 55-"50 Abus 3,85 4,85 Brass Padlock Total 3080.00 3880.00 Delivery 77 _Days 2-14 Wks I 1 1 k f I i i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM M; Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid N 9322 INFRARED VIEWER SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of an infared viewer to be used by the Electric Meter and Sub Station Depart- ment. The viewer is intended to be used for early de- tection and isolation of possible electrical problems, Being able to view "hot spots" otherwise undetectable, will prevent major problems from developing, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1983-84 Budget Account 0610-008-0252-9232 Electric Meter and Sub Station Capital Equipment RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Hughes Aircraft Company for a Phobeye 686 in the amount of $13,950.00. The Hughes bid is the highest bid, however it is the only unit that fully complies with the specifications, The using department has evaluated all of the bids received and recommends the Hughes 686 Probeye as the most satisfactory unit for the intended purposes, EXHIBIT: Tabulation sheet SUBMITTED BY: Tom D, Saw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent BID M 9322 BID iNFARED VIEWER OPEN 8/21/84 2200_p -m, %edar Hughes A.0.A, Barnes Corp. Engineer* 9 ACCOUNT $610-008-0252-9232_ ^ ~T , b 'PION ~VEN k - VN _ -956R-- VRNDOR- E UOR- V c _ RNDOR V1NnOR 1 1nfared Viewer _ J 13,600,00 13,950.00 Alternate 12,500,00 9,840.00 30 day 30 day 14 day Denton Carlsbad, Denton - - CA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 13ACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETINQs September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #s Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid # 9324 VACUUM iatsNlP SUMMARY: This bid Is for the purchase of a vacuum ppump for use by the Electric Metering and Substations Depart- ment. The pump Is complete with hoses, fittings valves, and training In operations, If necessary. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1983-84 Budget Account # 610-008-0263-9217 Electric Meter ahd Substation Capital Equipment RECONINIENDATIONs We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, North Texas Industrial Supply, in the . amount of $3,807,00, FOB Denton with delivery in 14 days. EXHIBIT: Tabulation sheet SUBMITTED BYs Tom D. Shaw, C.P.NI Assistant Purchasing Agent RID N 9~2~ 1SIU TLTtk VACUUM,NU-MP STOKES NORTH DIV, TEXAS ------AutC1JS1 21>1 ~4 -Zptm PENNWALT INDUSTRIAL CORP. SUPPLY ACCOUNT CO. I iT tE~ ~I;SGlill_1 V13NU0R-_._ VE:NI)OR - VENDOR _ VI°,NIX)R VENIX)R -------,,-_VF.NI)OR VENDOR 4566,00-~ 3807'00 Pennwalt Ingersoll 148-N Y255X5 PhlIndelphiH Denton w TX CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: BID k 9325 SOFT DRINKS AND VENDING MACHINES SUMMARY: This bid is for the furnishing of soft drinks, vending machines, etc. We sent this bid out to several vendors but have only received two bids for the last three years, The bids have some differences and also some variables, We have evaluated the bid from the bid quantities and find Dr. Pepper the lowest. However, if you consider the past two years selling, one with 0 Coca Cola and one with Dr. Pepper, we find we had the best sales the year with Coca Cola, If that were a firm basis we could be better off going with Coca Cola, But variables are weather, length of season, and attendance at the pool and other activities, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS; From sale of drinks RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder, Dr. Pepper Bottling Company for the estimated total amount of $12,677.50 for items 1 through 6, EXHIBIT: Tabulation sheet SUBMITTED BY: John J, Marshall, Purchasing Agent • RID N 9325 BID Soft Drinks & ending Mac in s OPEN August 21, 1984 2L00_p.m 1_-,-_ Coca-Cola Or, Peppe ACCOUNT 1 ITE RS IPT 0T _ VENDOk- V806 - V_ _ V DUR VR D R ENDOR WUNDOR _ -1 30m 12 oz, Can Drinks 5,75 5,75 2 5 Rental vending machines NC NC 3 150 Pre-mix cannisters 7.00 7,00 - 4 150 Post-mix cannisters 22,30 18,40 5 30 2 oz Cups 50.50 54.50 6 1 Post mix Vending Unit _ NC NC Mobil frailer 12,799.50 12,677.50 _ • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF NIEE`PINO I September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECTt BID #9326 SALE OF TRANSFORMER SUMMARY: This bid is for the sale and removal of inlarge power transformer damaged by fire while the settlement and the old unit must madeiwg ith uWestinghouse Shop. disposed of as scrap. ACTION REQUIREDi Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funds generated from this sale will be returned to the Ele.tric Utility Department. We recommend the acceptance of the proposal from RECOMMENDATION: the highest bidder, Mr. Carl Shifflett, in the amount of $1,600,00. EXHIBIT: "Ab\ulati~o Ft SUBMITTED BY: Tim D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent `b~~,~ N. __..9326..___._ - RM TITLF: _.SALFi 4C R.AM~C~i~ ~RAIQSFOVMF:R FULTON CARL oPF;NI?_----Lt>lgit-fit 21. 1Q!+-~2~,m• SUPPLY CO. SNIFF'LET'I' ACCOUNT N N_ iZIY l7'E~! DFiSCION _ VFINI)OA - - --VPNDOR VENIV}R VENI)Ok %PENWk_-- 1 Sale of Transformer (11i00.o0) 16o0.Oo tit Westinghouse Shop n ~ n CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: BID #9327 TRANSFORMER RATIOMETER S"ARY: This bid is for the purchase of a transformer ratiometer for use by the Electric Metering and Sub Station Department. This unit is used to field test power transformers, current transformers and capacif.or voltage transformers, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1983-84 Budget Account Number 610-008-0253-92-3 Electric Meter & Sub-Station Capital Equipment RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Olman Instrument. Inc, in the amount of $5525.00 FOB Denton with delivery in 30 days. The bid of Butler and Land failed to met specifications and is offered as an alternate only, EXHIBIT: Tatulation Sheet SUBMITTED BY, - _ t_•,: 4_~ Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent • OI'h;NE?U ___,yjiu5 _cl►.1~Q11.____~.N~ui~_-.... pNNSI~'IiUf•1h7M ,ANU~ tM ACCOUNT N x'LECTIMA ,4-44 -4223_22 3 MARKETING ASSOC I ATF,8 ...__V' Nhc~R VENDOR _ _VI?NDOR VPNWR._.__ 1 1 Transformer Iiatiometer 5525,00 _..Alternate 290000 Delivery 30 bays. 10-12 Wks. i, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA c t7`, BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING; Septmeber 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM'; Consent Agenda SUBJECT; BIDN 9329 JANITORIAL SERVICES SUMMARY; This bid is for the purchase of janitorial services for various buildings and facilities of the City of Denton, The contract covers the Municipal Building, Police Station, Personnel/Data Processing, Service Center, Purchasing Office, Vehicle Maintenance Office, and the yet to be completed Visual Arts Center. Bids were solicited from eight prospective bidders, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council and award of bid. SOURCE OF FUNDS; 1984.85 Budget Funds Account # 100-003-002-8502 j Building Maintenance Special Services RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid he awarded to the lowest bidder of Pedus Building Maintenance in the amount of $6$32.11 per month for all seven listed sites. Pedus is our current supplies of janitorial service. EXHIBIT; Tabulation Sheet SUBMITTED BY; ~ti• ~ V ICS , Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M, Assistant Purchasing Agent DID HID JANITORIAL SERVICES Pedus A-1 Building Building OPEN-- 8/28/84 2;00 ,m, Maintenanc Maintena ce ACCOUNT # 100-003.0002-8502 , ITffl4--UFSC -0 - -V-ERW-. V -VEWOt 0 - VE950 - -V-FRffO-R- T ND R - 1 City Hall 2780,-00 3336,00 - - Y 2 Police 1396.11 2300,00 - 3 Personnel/Data Processing 315,00 378,00 4 Service Center 976,00 937,20 5 Purchasing/Warehouse 75,00 234,00 6 Vehicle Maintenance 190,00 228,00 - J4----~ _ 7 Visual Arts Center 800,00 2400,00 Bid Bond Enclosed~~_____ ~ YES -YES TOTAL PER MONTH 6532,11 9813.20 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA l BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEEVINO: September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: BID #9331 WOODEN UTILITY POLES SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of the annual supply of wooden utility poles for use by the Electric Distribution Department, This material is warehouse stock, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: Working Capital Account #710-004-0598-8708 . HCOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of International Paper Co. Their prices are firm for one full year and the Fob point is Denton with delivery in 7-10 days, EXHBITI: Tabulation Sbeet SUD14ITTED BY, Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent I Is i t) N I I) T1'CI,M_ OPPERS Dla W:I LLIAMS ESCAMBIA TREATED COLFAX R:[ESTEN JITERNATIONAL WOOD TREAT INO TIMBER CREOSOTING 1111pi,Y Ia"ER CO, i1~~ENl?D 2 4 PRODUCTS CO, PRODUCTS CO, 10, CO, ACCOUNT I VI,NDOK -Vks Ix)R.__ VfiNi1QR ` trHNxfk 7., 160 495379 35/4 103.40 213,10 98,00 99.68T 21 _C)/_3_.____._-..-- ._l l-i,_'LQ------- - 1~7~1.Q------ _1~G,7Q------- ..1!x.3..?3_.__._ _...137..:15----_ 13G~55_-_-•---~..::_::3.1U _ d- .-_-_953 -._._----_-____!+113.__-._.-. 7 ---X5400--- ------~~3 ? ??t!~ - ?D4 2o5sQ-._ 1Q@-L44_- -141,5.3 5. 25 1+95405 55/3 273,70 276,4o 258,40 248,20 229,72238.59___-- pit+,50 Fob Denton Denton Denton Dentan Denton Denton nt,un Wks_._._ ...LO..llays__-- - Estimated Yearly Toted 128,491.00 237.02.7..50 12:L2L42Q _17.Q131.,00 119,962_ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING, September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N; SUBJECT; Purchase Order #63913 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, SUMMARY; This purchase order is for materials and labor necessary to make emergency repairs to a transformer at the power plant, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS, 1983.84 Budget Account Number 610-008.0253-8332 RECOMMENDATION; We recommend Purchase Order #63913 to General Eleo.,tric in the amount of $13,111,63 be approved for payment, EXHIBITS; Purchase Order #63913 Invo.ce,,•417E7700-001 SUBMITTED BY. el>,, ` Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M, Assistant Purchasing Agent CITY of DENTONr TEXAS , 215 E. MoKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDIR DENTON, TX 7101 R 0. NUM-NER DATENENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPE 63413 0G W44 C 1 0 GE~N70000 / VENDOR; SHIP TO, ra*F0 Cn♦/APPARAY05 SC4V DIV CONFIRMATION ONLY P.O. bOX 84462 00 NOT DUPLICATE 1 0ALLAS• Tx 754114 / ATTNI )[N41a J YFRNF:R ROO1 I j*jbIj€_i THIS PURCHASP ryujy P_SLJP„ FRrEr-O a-s &AQ1 A -,i-Ny oa..,uess ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, LINE AMOUNT 01 610 000 0253 1?582 k1332 1 PARTS FOR REPAIR GoE*12/70 MVA 6*960o79 02 6l0 008 0253 X3:53;? 1 LAODR G EXPENSES GG SERVICEMAN 59307o84 03 610 000 0263 f-59,^ 33"1 1 SPARH PARTS FUR REPAIR 643.00 CJ' TOTAL FOR P•0. 13x111.63 4 The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. X Reference PA. Number on all B/L, Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated. - Sand Iwooloss TO: Direct All Inquiries T0; City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent • 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M. Asst Purchasing Agent Phone 81716668223 817/6868311 DIFW Metro 287-0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer :y f , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N: SUBJECT: Purchase Order #64685 DENTON ELECTRIC SHOP SUMMARY: This purchase order is for fluorescent light fixtures, lamps, and miscellaneous electrical supplies for Phase II Remodel at the Municipal Building. Construction schedules prohibited bidding the fixtures. However, telephone quotes were taken, and Denton Electric Shop was the lowest bidder. They were also the low bidder for the fixtures in Phase I. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS: Special Project Fund Number 430-004-020M-GPF4 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of $3,583.26 be approved and the invoices placed in line for payment. EXHIBIT: Rur~hdse ONer #64685 SUBMITTED BY: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent ~v CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 216 L MoKINNEY ST, PURCH"a ORDER DENTON, TX 74201 P, 0. NUMBER DATENENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPE 0E 11"6 - - - - I . Q4/It3/44 CIO S 46 VENDOR: 0aN?4760 SHIP T0: 40 UE CRNFJYIiMATiUN ONLY 4G D$NiON 1.!?CTflif: *"'*r '"Co 318 * T LOCUST DO NOT DUPLICATE 46 NTC+Nr T14 76201 4G 4G AC S ~1N RC E9i0r4 WRIPTION SCNT OV16V&4 LINE AMOI f OI 430 004 02OM 4pF4 5►124 38 A2GT440AI2277V WITH LAMPS 1.558000 02 430 004 020M 4PP4 9924 6 I2GT2U40A12277V WITH LAMPS 270000 03 430 u04 420M QW4 6ilit4 A LIGHTS r ELEC SUPPLIES 4a660 Ir27ae00 04 430 004 020M GPF4 9124 I LIGHTS & FLOC SUPPLIES 46609 477026 kill- Mff&kk~ TU TAL FUN F.O. 3@ 533.26 46 The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No, 20. ~ i Reference P.O. Number on all t3/L, Shipments and Invoices, Shipments are FA,B. City of Denton, or as Indicated, Send Invoices TO: Direct All Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 E, McKinney St„ Denton, TX 76201 Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Asst, Purchasing Agent Phone 817/5"23 81715688311 DIFW Metro 2670042 The City of Denton is an equal opportunity employer CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: September 4, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent SUBJECT: Purchase Order #64726 NEWMAN ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT, INC. SUMMARY: This emergency purchase is for replacement valves for the Water Production Plant on Spencer Road. This item had to be replaced by the same valves as before or we would have had to do lot of re-plumbing. This company is the only area distributor for these valves, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget 620-008-0460-9106 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency purchase order to Newman Engineering be approved for the purchase of these valves in the amount of $3,512.17, EXHIBIT: Ru chase Sr er #64726 SUBMITTED BY: << .John J,. arshal l , C. P. M. Purchasing Agent C" OF QENTON, TEXAS 216 E, MOKINNEY 8T, PURCHAM 0lI101ER DENTON, TX 74201 P. 00 ( R D11T~y@NppR N0 ~8/ 1 e2 Cod DOCUMENT Typo $NEW51B00 0 4 SHIP TOE ENGINEERED EQUIP INC9 WAREHOUSE 4 Poo* a" gobl4 COWSKMATION ONLY 4 10052 MONROE OR* DO NOT DUPLICATE 4 OALLAS9 TX 75220 4 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUNT 01 620 008 0460 9106 9 APCO 4100146.3AIR t VACUUM VALV 29566417 02 620 008 0460 9106 9 APC4 3.'40066ol AIR RELEASE VAL 846.00 0:1 620 008 0460 9106 l FREIGHT 100.00 0 TOTAL FOR PeOe 39512017 41 The City of Denton, Texas is tax exempt • House BIII No, 20, Reference P,O, Number on all B/L, Shipments and Invoices Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated, Send Invoices TO; Direct All Inquiries TO; Gty of Denton, Accounts Payable John J, Marshall, C,P,M. Purchasing Agent • 216 E, McKinney St,, Denton, TX 76201 Tom D, Shaw, O,RM, Asst Purchasing Agent Phone 817/5664=3 8171668.8311 D1FW Metro 2674042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4~ / BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET ~Q DATE OF MELTING; September 4,1984 COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM Consent SUBJECT: Purchase Order #64753 ONEAC CORPORATION SUMMARY; This purchase order is for the emergency purchase of two CS1128 ONEAC switches to place on the telephones to eliminate the surge of electricity when switching from City power to emergency power, This will, or is supposed to, eliminate the down time we have experienced lately when the emergency generator automacilly comes on, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS; Budget 100.002-0007-9121 • RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this purchase order in the amount of $4,143,00 be approved for the purchase of 2 switches from ONEAC Corp. to eliminate the loss of telephone in case of power failure, EXHIBIT: P hase Or¢ r #64753 SUBMITTED BY: ~'!C CZl1...~Cf hn J': shall, C. P.M. urchasing Agent • CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 215 L MOKINNNY V, PURCHASK QRDRIR DENTON, TX 7WI DAT 647J >I I OR, NO, EN1 ER DQQ III T TYPEAGE 4 ON049004 4 lqw y~ q,' SHIP TO: q~ CgRPgRATI ON 4 22.07 LAKWOZ OR* 4 9ANNOCKSURN♦ IL 60015 4 4 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUNT 01 too 002 0007 $341 2 ONEAC CS1126 40118*00 02 100 002 0007 8341 1 FREIGHT 25000 TOTAL FOR PeO. 4*143#00 4 The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt - House Bill No, 20, Reference P,O, Number on all Bit., Shipments and Invoices, Shipments are F,0 8 City of Denton, or as Indicated SwW Involt" T0: Direct All Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payatle John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St,, Denton, TX %6201 Tom 0, Shaw, C.P.M. Asst, Purchasing Agent Phone 8171686-W3 81716688311 DIFW Metro 2670042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer 4 `e CITY OfDENTON, r#X" MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76101 / TEL EPHONE(817) 566.8200 MEMORANDUM TO: Betty McKean Assistant City Manager PROM: Kathryn Usrey, Director Personnel/Employee Relations SUBJ: Council Agenda Item DATE: August 29, 1984 On the agenda for City Council meeting of September 4, 1984, we have for approval an item dealing with a training session for all supervisory, management and administrative staff, We are asking the Council to approve a contract for a seminar on hiring and firing, The presentation, which has received exceptional reviews from some of our executive staff, is conducted by Padgett-Thompson, a management training organization, Padgett-Thompson offers seminars both in-house and at selected locations throughout the country and is known for its outstanding quality programs. The hiring and firing program is designed to equip supervisors and managers with information and skills to perform their employment and termination duties effectively and efficiently, while at the same time avoiding legal entrapments. The cost of this seminar will be approximately $6000, depending on the number of participants. We expect 95-100 employees of the supervisory level, If you have further questions about the approval of this contract, pli)ase let me know. a ryn s ey, ector Personnel/Employee Relati s /row 2041P July 31, 1984 Kathryn Usrey City of Denton 324 F. AL-kinney m; nton, `I'X 76201 DLar Ms. Usrey, ,phis will confirM our tel.epl-o»e coliversation regarding the "Nisic Supervision" 1'n-house to be presented to your group on SeptMW- r 61 and 7, 1984 by chuck Daniels. Me are very excited about working with you and look forward to a very succossful day. The cost breakdown for the one-day in--house seminar will be as followsr 1, $49.00 per person for a min.ijm n of 35, or $1715.00 per day. 2. $36.00 per person beginiing with the 36th participant. 3. Padgett-Tholrpson would provide the presr.-niter, the workbooks, and all handout nviter. ials, 4. Your Organivxition woulri provide the rmeting room and hwich, coffee, or solf drink breaks. 5. Your Organization would provide hotel lodging, meals, and any ground trw)sportation, and the cost of a round trip coach airfare from Kansas City, MO. for the presenter. (these prices are guaranteed for 30 days) Listed below are some tips for the physical set-up of the meetidlg rOM, based on our experience: 1. Meeting room should be classroom style with at least 24 inches of table space per person, 2. We will need a large f Up chart, or blackboard and stand--up podium and a riwr~r at least 8' X 121. 3. It is advisable to have coffee available throughout the day and soft drinks in the afternoon. Padgell•Thornpson • 8595 wasl 1101h Strcol • Overland Park. Kansas 66210 a 913.381.9810 The USU1.11 SChedul.o is as f011MV81 8 t 30am rogistrati.on l , OOpm sc-mimr restums 814 Sam seminar bog-ins 2 t 15pm - - soda break. 10100am --coffee break 2130pm seminar restums 10 t 1 S'Im - P"minar ros ums 4 100pm seminar concludes 1210n lunch This is, of ccurso, floxible and wo will be glad to work with you on it Please look over this contxact avid if you Ikave any quost.ions or need any additional, irnfolination, please call TOLL FR EX 1-•800.255-4141, Please mak© a sleeping roan reservation for Chuck Daniels to arrive Soptembor 51 1984, Please have the room quaranteed and held for late arrival. and have the confirmation sent to Padgett-Thmpson, After approval of the above, plee,se sign the copy Z have enclosed and return it in the envelope provided, S inoere l.y , PADGU I"11'1 "APSCN ; lla~~ Michael If. Sweetsor Director of In-House Services Accepted this day of 1984 CITY OF DFNIUN by t__. Sleeping Room Location Meeting Room Location CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE; September 4, 1984 SUBJECT, Approval of the final replat of lot 29, Section I , of Solar Way Addition SUMMARY After much debate and discussion, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a variance of standard subdivision requirements for the Solar Way Addition at its meeting of August 81 1984, Lot 29 meets zoning standards and immediate development of a single family detached dwelling unit is anticipated. Staff will issue a build- ing permit when the final replat is approved. ACTION REQUIRED; Approve the final replat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the final replat. ALTERNATIVE; Approve the final replat ATTACHMENT; Reduced plat N GCX,L9V av son Senior Planner 02101 )Iw ••41•/NY li1i LII 1•.1'f i t1. r I , 111 1 1 ' 1 11'.. 11'. N"I~~yl .-~JITi'il IIY )111 11) 1,I. 11111 Up{11.1 w II 14vatli Y Y441wu diJ'wball H 011-1 I 1. l': I.; 1. .111 IV/ if11 1.1 IIJ',I IItlJ 1 '11!1'1 Itt1111 111 11 '.I,I ,'11, 1 11,11 1Sirl l4d 1 1 . rl Ili 11 !1 I" 111.1..111 I1 •--1 _..yy---••NIQ11041 Irl -'1111 11 'S1 .1 111' 111'I~'ll Iq 141lIYll/ , • r, 111:. 111 '1'l Il I:I it JAY 1 ,1 t 1 11 {rptil 11P1' 111 IIN Ito lit + I K rl N41vb1 IJ 1141141 11'01 M„Il,lp,li6 t %Vill Al II111 ' 14; 1 111 4 1 :IV IN-N 111 I11.1 1111s IIII ,(y r'1 rvlr III 11 IIY "IN 14411 4111141 ' '~1• wJ HJ~S•IQ 1 .,,I 1 I3 `I I'.I 111 L.1 ]."1 111 I ItA 4141 Iowl • IP.'1: Inll.^1IV 1". 11 IIli A M 1Y )V 6dD 1. I r II 't u.1J 11 'I IY 1111 '1 kIIN1 N 1111111 IfllY111141 kilt I:1, W YI Ili Iii //gyVpp O ..11,1 U'. IN 11,1 11111+ 1.11 114 110$11 / VF (]ry ;01411 fo IIIII") I I IYY1l 1J 111011 Yr6odHM N ez ^I~1IV IN r!n4; / / IIC GYr M Il,pypH ~ I'. 1 :IA 1: :1 11. 'I 1'•'1.1711 1'l '1 'I.I 611 IY•. tY;4 .1`'11 11 "1:1 ' I II).,,$1 1 ' u I :11141 'I• ifNi / 1,~ / JJ•J fyd1~~1SY II 1 11.1. 1114 1,1111 146 / l~ /1~/ 1V n I mP Ii N41 ' I '1 , It IIII Vi IN 111.1 11 643 I FYIY iI'III{'• FI 1 .11 'k r Y UI' 1 1.1, r. 1 11 `III 1.111 / u:J1 1'41 1 1•bl.lo-l'i ` 1 ,1 Yf1 l'IINi I 11. ~ 1.1 1Y 'I ' : I 4 t Il . I..' t Il 1 } III '"V r11 I II "11 , Muni i 3 1.11 ivlwJiQl . 1 1 . 1 .1 1 ! : 1 1 .1 1 1 l k i d I I I IIJ• 1 1 I I4•INit 1 i' 1411 I:IY 1V Y] dV✓ ' 1; 1 1. 11111.1 11 .M II It AMIM (J )1 1 I, I I I li /iJ/S• V! I I 1 1 1) • 11 JJ,/ _ 1 1 111 tlll IY Ill. iHI11 I 111.1 1V YI I 1 I IV, 41 / JJJ` /J.y,S`•1(J Ot X61 _ '11> Y 1Y'11: 1'.:Id 11 U 11•FII -JJ..J /JJIf •I%f I_- 1• 11 11 1•.. is :YI 'IYIII / X,21+Q~11•~' 1 Y X11 :11111 0 1 U 11 I ! '11 tit 111 1 k:rlt YJ Id •I I' ~I,I , •.t1 it Y 4• '11111 ,G C,JPI I1 cz CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE; September 4, 1984 SUBJECT; Approval of the preliminary and final replat of the Krause Addition SUMMARY; This is a 3,887 acre L-shaped tract located ad- jacent and east of Malone Street and adjacent and north of University Drive. Anticipated land use is expansion of existing Dave Krause Pontiac/ Toyota dealership, All public facilities are in place and adequate and drainage shall be handled during the building permit stage, One additional fire hydrant is needed to serve this commercial site. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary and final replat, ALTERNATIVE; Approval of the preliminary and final replat ATTACHMENT; Reduced map r David blilson Senior Planner I I 0638a I i) trill of to IN 114 "+il nl 4rllln I PI OIfl IICh A INI AI/f. I P IA IVI, IYIIIY ill Nil4" l1111141 .1111 111 II YI 11 to -_•MA ~lii~1111 trlli A 1111 I I. 111 Y 1 1111 1Il l,l I INq 11 III r Vlnr 0 114 J 1 11171 M ~I In1 ill 11 .rrn 1 1 1 Iw •fillhl In 10 0."", Y 1 04 111 1'r ",11 111 1", . . 1Yrf n, nr• ✓'o~an'1 111111 i 11 111 41e l: fnl ti III Olt .SS 1 n1111a1 in1' Il itior"ll 4 IP lit I1 I•Ih V' n 1, 01 ,Ij 111 H 1 1113~n 11 ~'llll4 It loll lr 111ll•VU•In 'Ihr `Yr1 it, 111 ,I1IN, r•ra1. Il"I,0l 1., H 111n, 11 I:II^11 nlel 111 rr Pr n1. r... LI<I'r. 11 111 111J r. r Ilin; 1 1; ,P p L p _ Alrr ,1, n r.r In OD 110 1^IIM n1 r ' 'Ite lr'114/n y1' 11F1 trill Hlnf elri llv 1 "It 11 .r11 . fl 1 1 11. n1q• I r1, rY I tll.' lllr It IN, i f l 1, Ir ITL''r 1,n1111 rill. Aa' lln, 1 41 nl IrnlYn rr lull, 1.rn /AAr'HIQ 'CAtt V/^11111 r~ ""~~-r I'11II1 t'r 1. M Ill it l'lpjlrl M 1.<,.n~l 1.111111 lat 11.1 11,r.! TuHI S f I,'ll..Irlu, ..In N1 • YIINn1 1uv1 al u. nrt1 I'. . 1r 1111 111 f 1 , 1 1 , ` nlwfll I/111 a1 ra'll+onr1111an, 1.11. 1 1 a7 IRI~,11 Illt In 1'r lu. 1rr u1 Inl Ile1 11....1... . +Illf. it Ofl tl IY1 11111 II 1 f1 r'R ~:ul.li~/rl lil inr ~nIA .1• r - _ f f•1 IIIYI ~n1IJ IIV nl Ir Nlf•1\r r•~, In Il a,rll l r r 1 1 1tf I`.I' co \n11\ 11 IV 1111 JI M n r''l1 joCalf1u •VG ~ l _ _ f•f If V.1 111 .1;gNrll Inrl11 fl IYr 1• illll.Ilil lri.!n Iln Ilp Irl ".IN 11141~n1.1 .p , „ Irlrl ry of 'rl IA In1Yq //nr 4 II Illmll it'll. tl'f "I.1 1.1. F1 .1.,1 1 1 'i INa1. nl IM,I, Iftl In 11 Irrr ii1•' In 1♦r IbnII1Jh1 Ill nr Ili 1n1 Ilan r. rv f I 1 _ rn., .1 11,1 F., IIFLII II r.,1 nl Nr 111. i r .1. _ _ •I r.'J N, ilk AI II 11 "1.'rYlll nr Ir r IN; 1111 11f• II Ili IIIrI !111.1 1 n 111 Illf I', 1.•1 It" If 1 rlr r ._41QIE ,-QIV nl•I Ili fl i SII 11 Ur I1 0In 1 .i. '111.. r.Vp nl 1• n rl L• 1 , r I 1 1 X11, 1 1111.11 rl 11r 1 I I 1 MIY _ " I I 1 .111 f.r.rr rI Ib 111A 111.1, l . . .II Ir.l Ir .r 1 „ .r Q t.~,. F. 0. I II j I '.rl lhllar III\I r•I II'1 Irl' r r 1 ~If01 ; 1 ~ I lul 1e.1• a1 Irl n'Id 1. nn.I n~ 111111. ,.r Inl 111. 1n1 ,,111 11.r r1 1.1 M. Illlr It Ili r♦• n• b,. Iv Y~ 11111 Rn I 11.1 IIYn,n. ;1~1~~. 1- h J J Y A II1`!I \•.1 F.111f 111 1111 IFI 1111 11• ! 111on1 141rr 1 n n 11.1 111 1 I e i Inl 11 . 1 II x111 II if1, 11 bll 114 I tsh. 1nr11 nl'N .r• !1 ly.Viii N ' ,1. 3 _ f e p1 l+ IYItIN 1'1101 4 IIn4 1111 el 1;111 lyll Ir 1♦ bnn 1'n11r1 'nl 11 ,Imlrllll rn11n n1I r 1" p1 1 hfl V N 1 It 11 1 1n 11 \tI11.uYIn111, fllrr 11111 I'Inl 1111 rir I,Ir~..f 1 ^ ! V Mlf~l, ll Iu111 nrlM I~AI7 NOIrNE1 Nl01 inA w/ll ~I IA Ill 0,9 Ilnl Yr uJ Irln a1..1 '.,111 1 rlnl n I . 1 l e1 .1 1, 1 It 111 nl I1 I I ml 4 V I C I N I f y H A► I, _ 0 T = , rn a nr . 4l ISI rn n IYI a nnnu I11 YI 11tH v J 111 fI. "041, Irylill, III," 'J", Flrr:'ll 1 I 1111 lutN anal 1 I 1.1 f f 1 ' Il ~lr,l'i ;',L,,f ll 1'M1~1 •li Will 1111. 41. Ilfl rIl1 YP. ..1'111 1.~ 1 i . 1 11 I r 1 {1NIl 1 '♦e I1 i IM11 1111 11 1 ul II 1 It w _ > i ..._V r" 11 1 1.1 M Illd' Il iiiW 11<Ill• 1 111 IPIrIM 1..1 1 111 1 I 1 O t'> , ~ I .11 f \11 r11 1 , ,11 rr ;1 1 . 11 e n II' I '1 I 11 1. ill 1' 1 Y n A~ V F ~ , ~rrt 1 Ir- a111 t J -1~ TI- , Ir 1 ,I t f71n -L 11111' ail-' Flu It 11 0 1-1110 h NO, 4) n V 1 :i Jill b11ir 111111 i nn n r n : '1+11. rr 1r.n.• 1\ 1 nil. 1 f 1 r y I 4 II~rll llr N 1\1. r111Jr 111 111,' h111. I. P INI Irr .III fr.111 111,;1 rl, 111 IN I. I. • . , I 11111 11 i1 1Y 1 1r J1111r 41.,.11111 11 I.Mlllltl 11 111 11.,,11 1. 1111 r1. r.. 1 r 11, ~/Y 1 8 I 1.''11111 Illlll0l'1, 'II 111 rr rl.f r. I. 1 1\11 Ilfl 11111111 Irll Ir ♦11111'\r11 lrr•j. ' . INNON, ..J Y • r i f = I 1 • 11. 111111•.1, r'1'r 11r 1111'1111111 ••~IIInrll lr,rll 11111111.. Ili Il,r'I.r It lr l'I •1\, Iry r• 01 1! 01' 1 111 11' ' I ; 1 j 1.11. Iu 14 t 1 1 N 1 n 3 ~ x_11.1 'I f pr11 ,1 IVI ;I J IV IHII,rr11.1a.r lq qll rl nil 111 l.l.._"1w nl. _1011 tlrt. I. rl rl. 1. ' V Y 111 f \ L 11 . ,7`___ IIIM1 fI It,n Itln I llgl 1 , 11 r•,.,n fl f11x Ir" '1 Ili. } 1 I .r fll 11 I r 1 111. Irlll • I.' 1 w ~ n 1 ; 1' 'rl 11 9ql.l.. r nl, r . 1 a V J ; 1 r 1 ; 1 t 1'' r 1 1 I 1 11 1 11 Il I J 0 ♦ t V i I 1 n Ir. 1 .r nr 1.. r n 1 n It X1.1 I C III0 11 1 . , I r ' ; f 1. - 1.1. ..n. n.. 1r• oe II r„ILI Ill. W IIi .I r r. iU . , , _ _ plH 11 r1 u1 a r r _ ' J 1 P V v_ r tl l•1'. fl Il.h'. e i r11.P If, V1 ..n,1o 11 trgn 4;14 111., t., ..111.1.1. t ; t ref / e 1 ";,`"''.111 r11: "l IL LII it..1 111. :11. IL•Q l r11 n, , ".'il., 11 1.111.1.1. i 1,1 •111 r1 11,11.1111. 111 111 ♦,11 .Ill I. 41 1 11 1111 111.1111 11 y 1 , . • 11',1,' Irlr Ir. 1 r 1 r 111 Vr1 Q' , L I • Ir Ili 11,11 111.1 •Ir IIn1 11.• 1- O I - 1 1 n n/y I V I - rill. It 11 nl r Irn 1111 11 ill l•I Inll 111 nl,_ 1.11 IIYtI, M'1 flq ll lClry FINAL PLAT VW 1,'.I I:1 !1 4 t•'N Ill. 1U m er r~ w llrJ rf flf l./ T O N f 0'•1109' V 110 rILGUY Y, rnllMl Y, , Ifl ry IIUHd K R A U S A V 1 . ..'.__._t___ t,1A1 I Wnllnl, J< AVrNy runt, lh al 1.01 S 1 M 2 . P 1. OV: 1 4 _ / I. H u w fr.ru n1 Irn. 'n ill oil .nN a CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE; September 4, 1984 SUBJECTi Approval of the preliminary plat of block 2 of the Frame Street Addition SUMMARY; This is a 4,109 acre tract located adjacent and east of Frame Street, adjacent and north of Paisley Street, adjacent and west of Rose Street, and south of Mingo Road and the Texas and Pacific railroad tracks. The property is zoned commercial (C) and mini- warehouse land use is anticipated, Rose, Paisley and Frame Streets are subject to perimeter street paving requirements, Rose and Frame are residen- tial streets. Paisley is a collector street. Drainage improvements will be required as well. Adequate telephone, gas, electrical and water and sewer facilities are in place or available for extension. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat. ALTERNATIVE; Approval of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT; Reduced plat ~AAJd Dav Ellison Senior Planner 099lx !N! I '41111 VT~ -r^ ,~~~~.J 1r411•. 'I, q~lu 4J1 ..1.~IIL6 , y` lfl', u, 1u\yl. ll♦~;d ~rt,11f X`/,y, 'rC I ~~.(~f•1' n, r.1rr.'r.v1r,V atnY I uA I ~ i I •}I f 'IV 1.111 sx Y 1r J/.',I 'IV q4 ~ 1 c' rl~ l } In f 1. i e1.f. t4rCN r, r lx~ IX r f f I i \ Y 1 I I I, SEC[ l` Er 1VG I c 5B1 S; I I { 1 I zl~j l Ijl V~' i n O'1~y0 f~ w ,t0 0 1t Xl~ 32 r, I I M \ I LI .rrr 034 1 J J \ V -r 11 . I J g _ 1 L , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET' MEETING DATE; September A, 1983 SUBJECT, Approval of the preliminary plat of the Jay-Mar Addition SUMMARY; This is a 5,668 acre parcel located adjacent and south of F.M, 2181 In the City of Denton extra- territorial jurisdiction area (ETJ), Business office and construction yard land use is anticipated, Adequate gas service is available, City of Denton electrical service can be provided at customer request (this Is a dual-service area). Adequate 15 inch sewer service is in place or available for extension. Adequate water service will be available when the system serving the Hickory Creek Mobile Home Park is accepted. An alternative plan for water service is to extend an 8 inch line across the frontage of this tract. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval of the preliminary plat Rl3COMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat. ALTERNATIVE; Approval of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat ~I ~al;~ ~&W av son Senior Planner 0189j Apl J.' MAKEK 4pL)HVCY A 4-7 f'..M,_FI}R_ _ all l-.. acan,,"114--... _ JIII i' 1~~ flrx.n~Nw,l'Vr,lrtlrFelnr,fHlslws..ne.r..,_.. IPII tQ IiFT NI~Nt / Id~tlp Dll 1 h i + l r r /t 8W NYr NI rl11 V1. + f17E'll / _ r.., AC S wll .auino/ u41k l4r1w.. C 1 l ' MW ut4 4 •ct 1 1~ 5~~ 1 ..n1, + 11 CI 1. O. 1[ ,µl gµU CMMll P `4 1710 CVUYN l I'HICC Ill a~,auri~~ar r jnlj c~~ t, +,l Y711 P031 1) It I 'r1, 1 F)L)CKIIJ...` S.SW ac. A. C CANNON 5Y A 232 IOCATION MAP I [ Mals 11 0 1 1 1 0 SI V90 fA V 299 P 01 OR • N 1 I n Iwr x wtrlNM / I` J r f~ II D i MIA V PRICE 1 1 3 n b tC 1 ~If7J rx n;~ 26~1lM 41, Pr !I 1 00ttllMINIK, nur 1 JAY MAR avr)rrlonr \ l07 I !SL nr,k 04,, r' `•ulGB J•AA IAC4Sr Vp I ~t, lu au,rnJ c.T I':.nrL•.. 11.11 Tx 7tOSl s.60n Autf E C41MOU SIK YC I' 4 477 r Uf rJ ffi7J C/xlNl YI } . 01 11,[OItD IS 16 /"CAA9 1b,A 0 PIIIti .4 .1 41 J 111 OR r+ 1 °Ir 1'HflllllN~RV PI AI - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA VV BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE,, September 4, 1984 SUBJECT; Approval of the preliminary plat of the Westridge Addition SUMMARY; Proposed lot 1, block 1, of the Westridge Addi- tion Is a 1,73 acre parcel located adjacent and west of Avenue E and south of Stella Street, The property is zoned multi-family (NSF-1) and multi-family development is anticipated. Adequate drainage and streets are in place, Adequate water is existing on Avenue E; sewer loading needs to be analyzed and an existing 6" sewer line on Stella may need to be upgraded, Adequate electrical, gas and telephone services ' are available. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat, ALTER.NAi i VE; Approval of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced prelir ry plat W 4 Davia Ellison' Senior Planner 0743g 1 r 4ti l1 , 1 ~ (1T i I I I I \ON11 M.1 'd rlr bll. IpM.-w II 1 'ri ~ Innrl 1 1 IVOI 1 /1{\ /A , 1 n\ ti, fht 1. ~ y1 4 14 1 ~ I 1( 1 2CW( 1 I 11 r--..! _..._._L.._..._ t l} , '41 ry 111 \~_,7 1 M ~ a 111 + a fil ZIA% r / I 9LOCX ONE `rnlr 1 1) At . At p/pJ I,{I --1•,plb 3C5~i'Pi~71uTt"jl OT~ 1 u1 "\.v t, v...._ .__-Wil(OA" + /f W/svcaMORE -.--'(I r11 R 1aN ,(N(R N II h !N AN ~ 11.( , E Y If~rM k M fmM ru rp Jf v{It ~.vl{11v `.r I 1 ra Ail NO l Sol MI 1 Ln1R ,.V'• I VVI AUM AUAMI - 1± 926 AAMA I1EN70A1, rx 'a;rn f j 1061►IOAYV~41,fJ1~~ I r((U MiVJ11. Rf' WESTRIUOE 1' 1 SO' LOO I .ocx (Olt JULY 14,1904 I r3 r ! nrJi;>Ld~, S111 SUtlvfv A 9'N, [rtV 1 COUN(V J (tUIt011, tf.V AI _ ..r'RE2rMI) rr; WES TT III r1 rUgE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: September 4, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of block 1, of the Woodcreek Addition SUMMARY: The above referenced proposed subdivision is located adjacent and north of Brush Creek Road in the City of Denton extraterritorial jurisdiction area. The proposed land use is single family detached residential on 7.137 acres, Although in the ETJ, this and similar subdivisions are subject to City of Denton standards. Brush Creek Road is subject to perimeter street paving improvements. Brush Creek Road as shown on the thoroughfare plan is a secondary major arterial, therefore, 40 feet of dedication is required from centerline, Staff has recom- mended 60 feet of right-of-way dedication due to possible future designation of this roadway. Water service is to be provided by the Argyle Water System, as currently proposed. Sewer service is proposed from individual septic tanks, The City of Denton Utility Department has advised the developer and owner of the need to follow specific procedures for approval of alternative water and sewer systems (appli- cations for septic tanks must be approved by the Director of Utilites). A letter to the Director of Utilites is also needed from the developer requesting City of Denton permission to allow Argyle to provide water service. City of Denton electrical service is available at customer request. Adequate gas and telephone services are also available. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. The developer shall obtain approval from the Public Utilities Board, Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council to be served by the City of Argyle prior to final plat approval. Woodcreek Addition Page Two RECOMMENDATION; 2. The City of Argyle must grant approval to (Continued) serve the development. 3. An acceptable application for septic tank usage must be submitted and approved by the City of Denton Director of utilities prior to final plat approval. 4. Water lines and septic tanks must be constructed to meet City of Denton specifications. ALTERNATIVE: Approval of the preliminary plat. ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat NMiG M David Ellison Senior Planner 0188j SL1>Prt.; 1 ~ I r I ll 1 I r _a llAaf ~wptl l•VfpiUl 1 1 r-._..____.__ _.:.J._ ' ' ~ 1•nfr 1,'Ir I•.k 3a BREJ SlfI. CRCEK . a GIlk Irra 71it~wl,fl. 4• a,l,. 3 ROnE 'H' ❑ np.l i41 U~tir. lU 1 fr RO 7n0 of ~ z. r,n• it ~ l L . / .1 SIJ I1~l1-v 4• .131 , l I" rd,l SCREE' I'r100' ~ ' JUf,Y 17, I?fli 1 1 ll, i I 1 _rnirrl e_4_ 7 t r ~y'r 2'16 '5776 r ' CITY COUNCIL BACK-UP MMEY SHEET MEETING DATE: September 4, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of site plan for unit 2, Block 2, of the Fallmeadow Addition (PD.-8) SUMMARY: This 2.2 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Fallmeadow Street and Gardenview Street is zoned planned development (PD--8) for multi-family land use. The planned develop- ment authorizes a density level of 22 units per acre for this site. The developer plans to build seven (7) two story fourplox units for a total density of 28 units. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the site plan RNCOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the site plan, ALTERNATIVE: Approve site plan ATTACHMENTS: 1. Sito plan for Unit II, Block II 2. PD-8 site plan Denise Spivey` Development Review Planner 0221] AA'TAN NMIM 1004 I JC pTIp~y A{AP 1)7' I I' . 200U' 111 I ~url~ tt r - OARUCIVVIfW 9f. Haul I ; _t+ tl t lllta ! I Iran ~~t ' IIN+~. vort N ~cHVfar VON,&,~tM n. M 1• KII I A4n tAItO 'IS 4Wn1^~mnl i )tDOwe r )yyA 1 69.01V'I6 441 A,f A, FV \-.--tt tl_ - ._~._II IAV, V A flrt JIJ'n) 1:c2 VIIIIMbM `i vw Atf III, ~I ~ ~ Ir I h~ 0... M ADPOW y I i~'ti erli ~I R 1 (N£/aUOW VIEW GWAT_w-o,.. . I 10 Dront i N31I i • ~ X g I \ t O I! ' It JAAK IIr / LL I 1 r.. r )tlllpl/ VMIp AM+,Itu ill p'Ir rill di"A 1t' O 1 r ? II, _n Sit! r, All i VALLMEAOOW ADDITION ` UNIT 2 BLOCK 2 ri,63 1 NO ~W, r 11 I 7fa I L . 11 .cn, t r 'Ae 4 R -f n t.t 1] I~..' I.I - r pflJ frM 1.1Y kx) 5if~~ plan` j{eF aFProucdl f ~:1 _ , , ❑ W 119 and {r,. a I fffl ;_~C 22 y l f Ulll I K«,1 LIMN route town Home 41 LII IMkIMO_i I1IIt I. I ~ q, L H < r:7L...... I { FAIS.MEAaOW` SiR[T y ' ~ss / C,'~ ►r111411U ~~I I I_ I ~ I ~ ~r ,1 1, f~ i ~}r t1 `!1I~ I./ L.1 ~.J Intl 1,~ 'fir/ I- 1~ !1, 1 u it y1 Na, 1 « f KW r rJ", Ll w,~l I.e r_ +n.~ Pa14 •al 1 q W I n 4' i.. L._.. r ir' , r pulule ie J !!,e o W N l r._..__ Apal Imenls ` / I It. i~ . , LJ ~ _ ~ I a II'lo{MSed Apo, Invents 34 a•. f L_ ~cJti t d=fl { ORIVIL A!1l11 S:t~LQCIil UtllL.gNE_9lQCK2 .1}NLL. ~KQ/-MK-L 11NIL?.WQ_gl.OCKJ. UNli._QNE...._gIOGK...3, I ,wl f1 W.q b i}. . , i S,}G P 14n Was hd} dprtd vek C - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: September 4, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of the Denton Retirement Center Addition SUMMARY: This 6,034 acre site was recently approved as a planned development (PD) for a seven story multi- family housing community for senior citizens and a sixty bed personal care unit. The final replat conforms with the approved PD site plan, One driveway is shown on Bonnie Brae Street and a landscaped twenty-five (25) foot front yard set-back is provided. Adequate street and drainage are in place. The developers have been asked to consider on site detention for their parking lot. Electrical, telephone, gas, and cable TV service are in place and adequate. Water and sewer facilities are also adequate. ACTION REQUIRED: Approve final replat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the final replat. ALTERNATIVE: Approve final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat ~ - David Ellison Senior Planner 0325s 1 1 1 1! I'. II I IL J 1144 E PUCNAIl111 SUNYfj A' A16 i ' I • r I: ` I 'i fl '..u 1 II tio'. 1 - rill I, Ilq i t Ir;ll JI I.r I Ir1 •.r .r s1 ~ I .rl, I urv I'1 I I tI I III ' lire Lrr I . . f l I n pl,r lr vl.lll dV,ll 1 1 1•'1 Ilr II', I L RnAI Uses ring I .illy ROYfIq ' 11 1 Ir 11 "1 Ih 1 ell. 1 1 II 4r 1, •I Idlll 11 Ir I II 'P 1'Irl q 11 •I ~u I n \ 0 1 'It'll alt •I It Irv 1 Iti pal I1,'IA I •r'I a 'll 1 Ald 71 11 1111l Pl rv t Irll t'1 11.11 a1111 (rll la :II II J ,,l I rhr if Ir 100' jmv to, IS11d n n1ud 411 dlITl 11 nl r'.• .In.l^ It l l'rr by nll•p u'nl 'i I I,µ• I ' 1• 11'rll 11. t 1 .0. rl 1.'1 In I 1"1lrr IO 1'.!r t111 'VI ~ 1 'y'nr ,.n'.II .j•1 drvll'Pr 5: tlnll. Fa 11 1, nc'n I. !av. r!lil r.Ild Ir. rr r' r+1'I,l1met rlr.1•y II' II. , rill (a1111d 111' 0'4'.. r'rr r. IPI'• 1•I 'JI1 C.Iri1r Ir.K' dnA Hrr wn•r`'!11! I'C I 'f 1 tt !TW rlel.» h., Onr.l I1 h al. :'Ill I"k hu' TIC., r dell In Cnllmr 11; .,,lor 101. n 'll rl n'ar tl~ L0 11 61 II frPl tr nr '.1" Int 1r.r 1n III„IL n In •I.1 14 N rr:v 'l ll 4 v i; •11 I 1 '•t :1... r• 'I H 1:.11 h '11r 1 1.1r• 11 1 'p t l pl ul I d1•, •l I. I f'I I•r n,r 1 n ..+I .•1 'A J I r. l 1 I n l I I I I h l' r• I I r.l •IAI r I '.n 1. I. I Is 's ..Is + V 1' I l 'l n.'r I 11.1 r II 1 .1 I••1 1 !i av' 1 r jf Y ' , ' . , 11 '1' I I I r 11 L ~ I 1 r. 1 r 1 I I 11 a , I ' l.l I I' Ir rl r^I.1..r` 1 P~ ,Iy I Y11'1 t.' 1.1• ^6r IN 1 OF r r It ' ` Lq 1 I) ^Inl . Pl .y rvl. ' 1. :I III r. e..a. .ll ! 11 9 01NNINO ~r yl ll.l ,:.1• r1' rrrlr 11 1 ~ I .1111 rn1111 !.'ll. to do In. ..Ir1 .I yla ' ►C I n ,a+ r ' +v of 7 1.1 r n.l 1. I. • I. P.y 1, . I I. I . 1.. 1 d I.,' t d i r uld ,I I •1 I'%-"We %I it r•rl'n r• 1 .'n '.'nn11. . :Ilrr I'I!J i ....I' .•1". rnlCH 'f 11•In ' ~ I r `°r 1•' II• Iwu•'a !1 m-•nltr rlr;. +I.!r la l4 llv'1: n t dlnvr.. 'n Inn nl•.I I-wA I•.r v .'1 It11r 'ru'I Is" .!.•I r, . IS ry,.. . 1.. 'I; 1. .I!d :lvlr. l dl I•.n.• ..I al m 11111 1, h1, rA .I o rv~. ,rr•r,.. a 111 1'1 I. 1 r n. I, n,11,11 ••I 'fl. • ii it li^ I':. 1II V ILI I. r .•I II'L . '1' .I .'D'ull," 11.. I IIY~Y. I II I.II' '1 :.II 1 Ir' , n 11I. . ..I 1. bf, III 1• _ I ..II n , 1 I yl' •II Illl l n.1 '1 1 ,lyaln❑ ...In. . Ir~Jll.' .L• •1 ''1. 1n 11.. 1, "P r. rl p , r1'r•'. 1141 nl[r.r PP. rn'1. 1'I or, OENTON RETIREMENT CENTER AbbIt[ON .II\I :L>as rl u1, u LOT I PLO<N 1 II r p .,,11 11 city or DENTON, MNtON COUNty ICXPS 1 1 $#-It P REhl A/ N LOIS 1 "4 2 PONNIt PPA( I ~'r.' r III. 'or L.-,r ml , Ip01f ION Ind Part II E PUCHALSIft In nd .'1 rJJ ''llllnr VIII r I n 1!II I d,l. 1UPVt r A'tfA r„I i""I ~ / ~ I•I a II••1 r•, r.l nII .„r. r,'1 .1 u.I 4.d II .I I+:. •.I. rl J.I ! I'.41 -r nn rte.. ~ ' ^~~1 '.r .•I It 1, !il x'.11 --I'r I a L. I ' 11 ,I 1 .1 • i. .I.. 1. 11~ ' • • 1 n Is I I , l 1 I4 . ^►t1111 1l JlN 2 194 PLANNING AND ZONING COFIMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL nsee Denton City Council : Z-1672Meeting Date: September 4, 1984 GENERAL, INFORMATION Applicant: Curtis W. Hodgson R,W,G,P., Inc. 5336 Alpha Rd., Suite 5 Dallas, TX 75240 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action'; Change from the agricultural (fanned zoning classification to the planned development (PD) classification, If approved, the PD will permit the development of a 413 lot manufactured housing subdivision. Location and Size: A 66.5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Paige Road and Swisher Road. Surrounding Land Use North - Single family residences, and Zoning: vacant South - Single family residences, vacant East - Shiloh Cemetery, single family residences West - Single family residences, vacant Denton Development Guide: Area not covered by Guide. SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: County F,E.M.A. maps show a major floodplain in this area. Developer must follow all F.E.M.A. guidelines on map revisions and o'mendments, to Detention is strongly -ncouraged minimize the effects of this develop- (Case # Z-1672) Page Two SPLCIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Drainage; (Continued) meet. Manufactured homes must be 1 foot above 100 year storm level. Utilities; An 8" water line must be extended down Paige Road or down Shady Shores Road from the Corinth water meter to serve this development. A limited analysis of the lift station - forcemain systeo indicates that neither one has suffi- cient capacity to handle existing approved development plus this one. The developer will be responsible for providing adequate sewer service for the development. A gas main must: be extended to this area and the City of Denton will provide electrical service. Transportation; Paige Road and Swisher Road are collector streets with a minimum of 00' right-of-way, :3D' from center line. developer will be required to improve 17' of road and City will improve 7 additional feet if it is noeded to properly use the road. Shady Shores, also a collector street, should be improved, Offsite street improvements may be required during the platting stage. ANALYSIS 'Phis area is outside the limits of the Denton Development Guide study area. The evaluation of manufactured housing subdivision/ mobile home park requests has become a difficult task largely because most are proposed in areas initially within the extra- territorial jurisdiction. (Case 0 x-1672) Page Three ANALYSIS (Continued) The proposed development, a manufactured housing subdivision, differs from a mobile home park in that the lots will be owner I occupied rather than rented, As a result, this development will be regulated by the Subdivision Regulations rather than the Mobile Home Park Ordinance, Annexation has recently been com- pleted on this tract, This application for planned development zoning allows the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council to vary the standard requirements of the City. The plan, as submitted, indicates some variances from normal stan- dards; thereifore, approval of the site plan, unless specifically noted otherwise, also constitutes approval of the noted var.. iances. The opposite rule will also apply, All City of Denton development codes and their requirements are to be followed unless specifically noted otherwise on the plan or in the final ordinance conditions. There are several positive aspects to this proposal.. Lot sizes in this proposal will be a minimum of 5000 square feet and an average of 5300 square feet. The density level will be 6-7 units per acre, Research of national trends in various planning related journals has revealed that the 6-7 unit per acre density level and 5000 square foot lot size is considered an acceptable guideline for manufactured housing communities. Manufactured housing is considered a form of diversified housing which Is encouraged in all areas of the city. The proposed deed restric- tions and homeowners'. association to enforce those restrictions are also positive factors. There is a growing concern over the fact that the overwhelming majority of manufactured housing, mobile home parks, and low to moderate income housing in general is being concentrated in the eastern quadrant of the city. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-16?2I by a vote of 4-3 with the following conditions; 1, Street widths within the development must be 311. (Case M Z-1672) Page Pour RECOMMENDATION (Continued) 2, Proposed street alignments must be approved by the City Transportation Engineer and final approval of parking shall be reviewed by the Development Review Committee, 3, Perimeter street paving requirements along the entire frontage of Shady Shores Road, Paige Road, and Swisher Road shall be unposed when the platting process begins. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the petition with conditions 2, Approve petition with additional conditions 3, Approve the petition without conditions 4, Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1, Aerial 2. PD Concept Plan 3, Reply forms total 4. Propert' y owner list 5. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July 11 , 19134 l 0648g '~'I : ; ►+v1T~r 1. ;iJ"{' i ' jy~ -ii~' .r'1n k~ ' * :r... ~y ^ff ,~~7y~1~~, t y~FFr§ _ r"jt Pit16., 1 , rN'•`• ,1, fl A'1 [ `~ty1 Y' IY• ~I.y , N. ly'{•• .\^k,y 71i,V•( S ? \ „ 1 } rS , r r t • ° r l l' , , • r y lS~',irl 11 r1 14~ t 1 t , s A A a '~1. M. i 11F stn) ( r.. ' y ~ ~ 1 J . • S~ M ILI" t r '1 !r11fA+~tt, .lI 1 L 1~►]IJ., r r, f' a~b •PU t "E!4. • '.i: ~yIA~'. V +1, YL~IVf/VVV,, / V Fq' 1" • ° V " t «,i 1/ •1{,~'~~~ ,f.r~~V4 ~ i l.\~ 1'a~ ~ •1Y•~ 1 A~ t f*~ .1175 `t •Ili~~~' •i r i ~.~r. ~ / F• P~ 'r, 1 / ll Pr'\t`.ttl♦ 1 VSI' Sj' Wr } y,: ,r i . .,..iii, ! ~ y ]I 3, : , 7 {T ~ )a, q('~ a F + P! ty~r / { . ` ~f r\. ~•i .t`•r ~r 1 S i y rt~ C ~ . 1 , Y1w • ;'yam ~f''~~''1 tiI I . ~~V'J'~ ' Irr• P 1I'A'h .7 ~.r ` '4. ' A r 3~'. ,y Yy7 1 r • ' ~ 1 yrl ) ~ ✓ ! u~ J' " ' jr~ 11~i 1~'~w V~ "31 ' " •+t . ~ , 1 ` r t 7 r Y..fr'~♦ i ~ rI 1' ' I' t.. ~I ~ ~ t .'1 ~1! r a It:14,< y' l r ttl ' t tP1 }S~ ° t n' 1.11 Fit 1.-, ~YW 1` a Y•. ~1.. r d r } t r T' i , b^• r t ti f,' L tf~y}y'}[F}y~It ry• Ji , - 1 t f'i• s'A+ Ir~"il#'~f;51''1'i:'. J J,;^ p` - ' p ,ti,; ' I ' it IF I t ~rt 'l t I ~[r e. , Cl . r ry !1 _ .a j , M Y•, r• f;'I~y, di ✓<r !•'~A #.1 l.!~t't•T °'Ff. y Alt ~I(y F'cl i.\aYr + ~ .~•1V' ~ • .1~ i ~ r I 1, -;O~1.~~iy1-rVV117d,~I•• ~er~ r ~i :4i t ,a~Y' C♦ '7;1 17.V. ~1T'l- ; 1 4~^,.f r~, " ! P,~'/ f`` , , / Ir )f ' r' •ia /'Y'~i 11 r ,r' ) yy t'". } ~~~1r,CIt r -r i~~! `r~~ F+ St `!f ~~~~~1hs"'•~ r ~ ~ ~ 1 ~f ♦ l'i Y ;ii!i YH.t~ t ,•Y c fly,`♦}'~'xf'rR. t y yy) a~` ,7.'✓{~ ; {t 1~' , • r I~.~;. F My . i~ t .f Th r Si F :"1, q ~3 l K~ j , ,r' r J •.'(S p' 1`1,~ F , • + ~ ~,t . 4*r • 1 a ; •t,t;r,~iV.~pn~ RR ''~1 ,,J/t j .•rT;r' t1•.lt o ` .`,t ~~a° ~ r `P~~'~, •`ili r y 1 r 1'i~~J r~~'~~ t;~ S~~ret4' pr ~ Tf ~1 r , , I ' +,•1, pti i~ ' t ' .t A ~'11 ~ltj . If \ t,, . 1 b, i[} R\~ i!/\. "4`yµ "f~ti~f +!i ! • • 1 • 'I' t • h a`~ ~t ~ r,C4,~a ~,~t ' ~ •t/t y,r +'rv l ~ ~ ! ~ t } p t. 1 J r I'r 4i C ur a; Hod Y I I _ C l 77 11 ` .l~nitkJ.J'~r~IR..tlTtt IR..! 5n,- , ,~~E~ II NNI 21N1 .4 ~I j t 'v 1 1 I ~,d.F11N ~Ill , tt I INpO~~ '111141 IinNw ,1,.•reA ~JI1 ..IG d +S n f" .I~..~ IUIpI Wa,lrl.lgs Jla i I{ iff 4 • ~ ~ ~ rcrcnahlN 1}Inhworr Inw \rldlh•- 111' i LI ~ I I'I 1 Hid ✓ I " tilue- SINNI' I ' I ~ :1 t 111 1, ` I'aftilu4 511wea'n I'+"`'IJcJ~ III:II ' ' 1 I', ~ „ ~I f ~ ,~'1~A 1 ~ ' .a~~ ` NvlunsGN{ ISmJ~• L;ih ,K•, ~ ' ' 1 ' , 5, ~ ,5(t~' IU).N'. i)a•Jk'nHans 134 ,~y+ 5 I 1 ' ,...1✓r .rY'~\\ 5. ~~I, ~ (:IIINNwwI .1r.w. !.aJua•. • ~ 1. .~n ,.J ~ I {,~S •`j II}f ~ ~INh,h ltprilh NL l,wf W, t ,S a „-~;'.-J" ~ ~I~ dram Iwhe,lennlp I ,1vcn4h\ I,nl 5,341' NC Area In Srreute 8.8'htcl ll`} 4 ! I 1+1 It I.._~ Ii~wl.~" fi ~14 r I 1Mf I L s1 \ ,I fl I ~ 11 1 ~ ~1 ~ IN IYEI N/r •wllrvdn,Nl1lliJ I P{ ` ~ ~ ' ~ 1~1 I fy, "W 1♦` /,l ~~?•JR11IIrC ..11}? ! f Y, tS. ~I~I a el. IL, I .I ~ 1 I } Y•I j it - I ~•t I -~l ~ I I ~Ir / lJ~~ ! ``•I Vicinity Map 'I t1 ~ I •~I 1 ~ ~1 ~ I 1 I:j I 1 r t 1 y~. aY Vf Y ~ Ily 1• 1 zs .I ~ 7 ~ ' rhlha, 1 V~n~~ ~ ` ti ccnw<prv I\°•' 444 •~,+,~~Y~ "V -~a.. ROLLINGWOOD 71rc,~~r1c ESTATES IesJS I 1 i \ ) ul Ikeilupan 1-~?!~I`'~-'u•.. I All Mklili,Nt Ill Ole (1115'01 • 1 0.15 GP.INI:, - ShuJr 5lpuct Roo SS,lH IVyim ILL Dalhre;ldras,75241) :1 PROPERTY OWNER REVLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1672 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received John L, Tinnerell.o Route 4, Box 128-B Denton; Texas Neal J. Tinnerella Route 4, Box 124 Denton, Texas Carl H. Johnson Route 4, Box 1:32 Dentonr Texas Kevin McCormack Route 7, Box 108-A Denton, Texas John A. Russell 1 Chapparal Drive Denton,Texas I n I , 4^ i 1 ~ ! I w 41 C y 4 rli ILI i Y . i l- /rL4 st'FC .G'~•l.'1-~ lL-y-~r.•-~-.c.-~--E~-t_._l / zs . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a Ile ~ l_1' ! ~ Z Minutes Jul 11, 1984 Page z 6. Apgroyal. of the preliminary and final plat of the extension to the Gollege Addition. G. Approval of the final plat of the J, b, Addition, D. Hp royal of the preliminary and final plat of the 13o by Morris Addition, E. Approval of the preliminary plat of the i(orthridge Subdivision, lots 4-15, bloc(c 'l, F. Approval of the preliminary and final plat of the Roffino-Walters Addition, G. Approval of the final plat of Royal Meadows Addition. H. Approval of the preliminary plat of the St. Andrews Place Addition. 1. Approval of the final plat of the Super d Motel Addition. J. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Windsor Park Addition, Section 11. Mr, Sidor made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Seconded by Mr, E;scue and unanimously carried (7-0). III. Public Hearings A.r 'L-1b7L. This is the petition of Curtis D. Hodgson, representing RWG?, Inc., requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PU) classification on a bb,5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Page Road and Swisher Road. If approved, the planned development will permit a 413 lot manufactured housing subdivision. Mr. Ellison stated there were 15 reply forms mailed to property owners within [UU feet of the subject property; S were returned in opposition and zero returned in favor, He stated there were 29 in opposition that were not on the mailing list and b in favor that were not on the mailing list. He stated the property is in the process of being annexed. Mr. Curtis Hodp on stated this is a bb and one half acre planned community development and explained the location of the property. He stated this will be a highly restricted subdivision with lots 5400 square feet. he stated every home will be owner occupied with attached P & Z Minutes July 11, 1984 Page 3 concrete foundations and all hook-u s will be as re- quired by the City Subdivision Regulations, He stated the lots will range in price from $1G,UUU too $40,000 with 980 to 18UU square feet living space, He stated he chose Denton for th!.s development because of strong demand for this type of housing development and because all the nice parks in Denton are full, He described some of the highii&hts and amenities he is proposing and stated he Is the first developer to meet City of Uenton specifications on mobile home parks, he stated his development is similar to Lakewood Estates with the difference being his proposed is a subdivision rather than a park. He stated he was proposing 10' wide private streets and that Rollingwood Estates would be a closed community with private access to Shady Shores Road. tie stated tie is proposing cluster parking at 1,01U parking spaces for 413 lots, on question from Mr. Claiborne, air. Hodgson stated the average lot size is 54UU square feet. He went on to explain his proposed homeowners asso- ciation with a neighborhood watch service comprised of a three person board, Mr, Sidor stated he had some question about the lb' wide streets as the Subdivision Regulations require 30'. i Mr. Juren commented that the site plan has one point of access for bb acres, ylr, Pearson commented that mention had been made to a mobile home park as well as a manufactured housing development, Mr. Hodgson stated the main difference is a deed restricted area and attached concrete foundations. Ms. Charlotte Zimmerman, vice-president of Texas Manufactured Housing Association explained that toe homes would be permantently anchored to the ground. I'he wheels and axeis would come off prior to anci,.)ring I.he home, as required by State and federal laws. Mr. Brian Burke stated he was the local engineer and had been working wtth Lmr. Hodgson with the drainage and utility problems. P & Z Minutes July 11, 1964 Page 4 Ms. Gole, a resident of Lakewood Estates, states she had looked and looked for a nice place to put her mouile home, and found a limited number of nice places, She stated she has a very nice home and when the skirting and shurbbery is placed around the mobile homes, you can't tell it's a mobile home, W.P, Phil ?Milli a, GZUU Southridge, stated no is the attorney for KW(T He stated he hasn't heard or seen of a proposed mobile home park that didn't have a lot of opposition; however, he stated he has been out and looked at this property and it is not like most mobile home parks, this one is real nice, He explained some of the features of the proposed park. Mike Bowers) a representative of Manufactured Housing Industry, seftted that when he first saw the proposed, he was quite excited about it as the market for this type of development is increasing. He stated that B out Of 10 American families are priced out of the market for housing, With this type of development, this figure drops to 5 out of 10 families. He stated the type of people who would buy are quality citizens who want to own their own homes and in his opinion, the proposed ranks in the top 99 percent of projects in this country in the past 5 years. Mr, Pearson asked Mr. Bowers to elaborate on how the homes are attached to the concrete slabs, Mr, Bowers stated a concrete ueam is poured on an agreed figuro, usually 18" in the ground and is tied to the steel structure of the chasis or the frame of the mobile home. Mr. G.laiborne asked what is the life expectancy of manufactured housing. Mr, Bowers replied that is a hard qyuestion to answer, however, loans are being made for 30 years on the homes. Mr. Curtis Harshaw, Vice-President of Harshaw Properties in Dallas, stated he is the President of North 'T'exas Mobile Home Park Association and has known Mr. Hodgson for four years and knows that he is a meticulous person, He stated in his travels around the area, tie has found that the parks are only as good as the home- owners association or the management. Y & Z Minutes July 11, 1964 Page 5 Charles tiisho , a resident of Denton West Mobile Home lark, stated ge has been looking for two years for a place to put his home and is definately in favor of the proposed. Mr. Charles Stoval, a resident of Twin Lakes ttllobile Home Park, stated the mobile home parks in the area are be- coming more and more run-down and the lot rents are no unreasonable that people can't afford them. He stated he is in favor, as ne has a nice home and would like a nice place to put it. Mr. R.J. button, owner of Lakewood Escates, stated he has taken the time to check Mr. Hodgson's credibility and has found he is a man that does what he says he will do. He stated the only matter that they differ on is the subject of streets within toe development. Mr. Sidor commented that toe streets would have to be built to meet city requirements, which are SU', 111r. Button, commented that the question keeps coming up regarding the concrete foundations. He stated the foundations have to be inspected by HUU. in opposition, Mr. John Tinnerello, Rt. t4, Box 124, stated he is an area property owner of 6b and one half acres and this is a beautiful area with trees and rolling hills and creeks. He stated that a lot of the trees would have to be cut down to build this development. He stated there is already a significant amount of traffic on Shady Shores Road, which is a small country road. He stated that wood shingles and exteriors would certainly be a fire hazard as the structures would be so close together. He stated in his opinion, the proposed would ruin the environment of this land. JoAnn Yuttal, Box 1:375, stated that people who live in high density housing do no take care of their animals and stated that the animal control should be increased. She stated that the entertainment center is proposed to be placed next to Shiloh Cemetery which in her opinion is not a good spot while someone is trying to bury a loved one. She stated that those of us wno have lived through WW 11 knows what pre-fab housing looks like and that it deteriorates very fast. Y 11, Jul X, 1984 , Page 6 Douglas Mann, a resident of Chapparal Estates, stated the lot sizes in Rollingwood Estates compared to the lot size in Chapparal Estates are 15 to 1 and in his opinion that is too small, He stated there was water standing on Swisher Road approximately 61 for many, many days of last year. Jane Piston, a resident of Chapparal Estateoo stated their subdivision lies directly adjacent of the proposed development. She stated their children attend Denton schools, support Denton banks and merchants and attend Denton churches and we don't want this type of develop- ment next to us, She stated their homes are built on 1 to 4 acre lots. Dennis Lyon, a resident of Chapparal Estates stated someone will have to pay for one half of the paving of the creek to be widened and put in at least three bridges. He stated a sewerage pump station is at the north end of the property and raw sewerage is lying on top of the ground. iMr. Ham stated he was not aware of a raw sewerage problem and would give the matter immediate attention. Mr. John Russell, 1 Chapparal Drive, stated he lives on the east side of Swisher Road and he feels this development is inappropriate to this area as well as this many type homes that are being proposeu. He stated se feels that there are a sufficient number of mobile home park developments in Denton and this area could be developed as a single family residential area that would really be nice. He stated he feels there is a much better land use for this property than a mobile nome park, Al Faulkner, an area resident, showed pictures of two other mobile home parks that are hUD approved and that nave lots for sale and home owners associations and that are not at all kept up. Joy Powell, Kt, 7, box 108 U, stated she, her mother and her sister own lb acres on Paige Road and have strict restrictions on their land and feels that this type of development would devaluate their property, bill Krueger, a commissioner in Shady Shores, stated he wanted to stand in support of the Goapparal Estates residents. P & 4 Minutes July 11, 1984 Page 7 Mr, Ellison stated the proposed is a manufactured housing subdivision and not a mobile home park and all Subdivision Regulations will apply. He stated 31' is a minimum standard City of Denton street and staff feels that Mr. Hodgson should comply with City standards. He stated concerning drainage, County F.E.M.A. maps show a major floodplain in this area and the developer must follow all F,E.M.A, guidelines on map revisions and amendments. He stated detention is strongly encouraged to minimumize the effects of this development and that manufactured homes must be L' above 100 yyear storul level. He stated an 8" water line must. be extended down Page Road down Shady Shores Road from Corinth water, meter to serve this development. A limited analysis of the lift station - forcemain system indicates that neither one has sufficient capacity to handle existing approved development plus this one. The developer will be responsible for providing adequate sewer service for the development, A gas main must be extended to this area and the City of Uenton will provide electrical service. He stated if .annexed, any Improvements on sewer systems will be bared by the developer. If not annexed, the laity cannot enforce city regulations. He further stated, Page and Swisher Roads are collector streets with a minimum of W right-of-way, 3U' from the center line. The developer will be required to improve 13' of road and the city will improve 7 additional feet if it is needed to properly use the road. Shady Shores, also a collector street, should be improved. Offsite street improvements may be required during the platting stage. He also stated the Denton Development Guide urges diverse land use in all areas of the City and not all lower income housing in one area. Since this is a PU request, he stated the commission could request square footage of 1,000. Staff recommends approval of z-lb71 with conditions. On question from the chairman, Mr. Ellison stated yes, this property is being considered for annexation, On question from ass. Cole, Mr. Ellison stated the commission could require a greenbelt area; could require larger lots; and could require wooden screening or fencing around the park. Ar. Pearson asked now many acres and units were proposed by Champion. Mr, Ellison stated lU4 acres and 550 units, Z Minutes my 11, 1984 age 8'. Mr, Button stated his development included 84 acres and 413 units. On question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Button stated full occupancy of his development would probably be within the next two years, Mr, Hodgson stated he felt that his development would not decrease the area property values. He stated as far as a traffic problem, the neighborhood traffic will be kept to a minimum which is the main reason for one exit out of the development and to keep traffic from passing by Chapparal Estates. He stated if the City wants 3U or 31' streets, we can go back to that and a [ car parking space per lot with ample on street parking. He stated he can move the swimming pool and recreation area as we have already moved the tennis courts to the center of the property to keep balls from flying off the prop erty. He stated concerning drainage, he doesn't plan to skirt any of the city standards, but to comply with city regulations. He stated he chose this land to keep in the country style. He stated he would assure the commission he will make Rollingwood Estates a quality environment and do what he says he will to make the development a desirable place to live and to meet any conditions commission might stipulate, Douglas Mann stated, the staff recommended widening Swisher Road which in his opinion, they would have to move the cemetery or acquire someone else's property, Lynn Snider asked if the utilities were going to be underground, Mr. Hodgson replied they are, He also stated there would be 1 and one half acres of park instead of 1 and one half, Chair declared public hearing closed. Chairman LaForte commented there has been a lot of opposition however, he intended to vote for the proposal. Mr. Sidor stated if the proposal were a mobile home park, he would be opposed; since this is a subdivision, the idea of a person being able to purchase a lot and a home appeals to him. He stated he feels there is a need For a subdvision such as this proposal. GMs. Cole made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1676 with the following conditions and amenities and highlights given by the petitioner at this commission meeting, P & Z Minutes July 111'1984 Page 9 1, City Of Uencon preliminary and final plat approval is required before building permits may be issued; all normal standards apply unless expressly waived or varied by the Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council. Street widths within the development must be 3U' and shall conform with the subdivision regulations and standard city engineering specifications. 3. Proposed street alignments must be approved by the City Transportation Engineer and final approval of parking shall be reviewed by the Development Review Committee. 4. Perimeter street ppaving requirements along the entire frontage of Shady Shores Road, Page Road, and Swisher Road shall be imposed when the platting process begins. A coq of the geed reserictions and or covenants must be on file with the City and County of Denton. b, if 15 percent of the site is not developed within three (:s) years, the zoning will revert to its previous agricultural (A) zoning classification. 1. That all hignlights and amenities given by the developer at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July 11, 1984, apply. Mr. Pearson commented that there were good points in favor and some valid points In opposition. ~,Nr. Juren commented that the proposed was a very imaginative way of putting mobile homes on lots. Mr, Escue stated he feels it is a critical issue within two jurisdictions and that some type of.buffering is needed as well as reasonable larger lot sizes. Mr. Claiborne stated tne difference is between a mobile home park and a subdivision and he intends to vote in favor strictly by point of a subdivision. Mr. Sidor seconded the motion and vote was called, In favor; Ms. Cole, Mr. Claiborne, Mr. LaPorte, and Mr. Si.dor; opposed; mr. Escue, ,dir. Juren, and Mr. Pearson. Motion passed by a vote of 4-3. /0 / NO, All ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DGNTON, 'T'EXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO, 119-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TC b6,5128 ACRES C:' LAND LOCATED AT THE SUVrHW8ST CORNER OF PAIGE ROAD AND SWISHER ROAD, AND IS ,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINI TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLA$SIFICArION FROM PLANNED AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CLAS CLASSIFICATION NAND DUSESEDESIGNATION1IN AND PRUVIOING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY URDAINSI SEC'TIUN I, That the zoning classification and Lisa designation of the following described property, to-wits All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in the ueing nmore xparticularly Udescribed as3fol,lowsi:on County, Texas, and BEGINNING at an iron rod in or near the center line of Swisher Road at the northeast corner of a 160 acre tract conveyed to Mr's. Martha Thurman uy John R. Riney) THENCE south 87052119" east, along or near the center line of Swisner Road, 1,172,20 feet to an iron rod for eornerl THENCE south 03002139' west, varying from the east side of Swisher Road and uack to the approximate center line of Swisher Road, 1090,31 feet to a P. K, nail for co ral Rin or near the intei'section of said Swisher Road witn Chapp THENCE south 0021'18' west, along or near the center line of same said Swisher Road part of the way, a distance of 1148.87 feet to a 2 inch iron pi.pe in a fence line THENCE north 86041115" west, along or near a fence line, 205.44 feet to a 2 inch iron pips for corner at a feriae corner] northOlineOof 5haay Snores Roadr to an iron rod for corner THEN nearOthesouth THENCE north 86049114' west, along or near the north line of Shady Shores Roau, a distance of 585.27 feet to an iron rod for corner in the easterly right-of-way line of the M,K anti T Railroad, also being r.ne oeginning of a curve to the left having a central angle of 12°14115' and a radiua of 2914.79 feetl THENCE along sale curve and with a fence line an arc distance of 622,55 feet to a 2 inch pipe for corners THENCE north 02000100' east, along or near a fence line, a distance of 2168,42 feet to the point of beginning ad containing in all 66,5128 acres of land, more or less, is hereuy changed from Agricultural 'A' District Classification and Use Use designationtiunder thenncomprehensive t2oningCordinancetiof the City of Denton, Texas. Z-1672/CIIRTIS U. HOUGSON/PAGE 1 SECTION II. That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any bullatng within the planned development district, the following conditions shall be met; 1. Street widtns within the development must be thirty-one (311) feet. 2. Proposed street alignments must be approved by the City Trans- portation Engineer and final approval of parking shall be reviewed by the Development Review Committee, 9. Perimeter street paving requirements along the entire frontage of Shady Shores Road, Paige Road and Swisher Road shall oa imposed when the platting process begins, SECTION 111. That the aevelopment of the property shall be in substantial compliance witn the site plan attaonea hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, The zoning ;Sap of the city of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the city of Denton, Texas under ordinance No. 69-1, ne, and the Same is aereby amended to show such change in District Classifi- cation and Use subject to the aoove conaitions and specifications, SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose Of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraying the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the city of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval, the requirea public hearings having heretofore been held oy the Planning ano zoning Commission and the City council of the city of Denton, TexaS, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984, RICHARD O. ST WART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY AT'T'ORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS By: (U. n yvw. Z-1672/CURTIS D. HODOPSON/PAGE 2 I / I ` { I 1 C y..•.- • 1 j 7 1 ! i 1 r' { r 1 1 v' • ~I - t I ~ 111r a1 i 1 I ` 1~) i r' ~I~ 1. lixxl 11rn« Icrvl. rv..U:~ I , f 1 ' I ~ ~ ~ I ginxl .4x d l u- 141 I ( ' i'la nlnM IIIrIIMNM I. tl Nlhlr 1111 J ` it ro.xl r) \iu- 4.m i I i f 1 ILr11w~ ~I'wll Urn idl.l- Will 1 ( ~~~`•r• I1 111111'. I/1'Jll.ONO% 1.14 Ai. 1 f ~ 1~r'~~`' I S IS~wNrM 1r.m :11+1 ddd llv ul. na llnxl, Mr1. Iran LIn, tcanN I ~ .lJ \ra1111 \IM1el1 N\'Iw with nl•l/r~wW r . l 'L 1 i 1" 1) 1 'mw Hl-~ I 4. A' ` •ti~!`~.~~ r 1 Ili _~ea _ / 1011.fn ~f { rJ I I 1 t, l , ~ •f' t li 5'IClnuy NIp ) ~ 1' „nwllr, ROLL INGWOOD - F.S,r;vrES ~ If Ikva4Kxn -us~.,__.u.. ~1.~.._.~J \n 1JJiln xl In qlY lln)nf lklwo 11 ua 1 IOllil',, bCl:.' >I wh 1fN NII IIouJ 1 5.1.1h Alphl Rd. UIIIu.It.xa. 7571n PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL 710t Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1674 Meeting Date; September 4, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Jo Storer Rt. 01, Box 276 Argyle, TX 76226 Status of Applicant: ~Wner Requested Action; Amendment of planned development (PD-6). If approved, the PD amend- ment will permit the following land uses: I 1. Single family detached 22 lots on 3.8 acres (typical lot size 120'x45') 2. Single family detached - 106 lots on 34,1 acres (typical lot size 120'x80') 3. Cluster housing - 215 units on 18 acres (12 units per acre) 4. Two family 16 units on 2.3 acres Location and Size; A 58,2 acre tract located on the south side of Colorado Blvd. approxi- mately 1500 feet northwest of Loop 288. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Colorado Cts. apartments, 7-Up bottling plant; PD-6, Ll South - Single family residential; PD-6 East - Howling alley, vacant, mall; PD-6 West - Single family residential, vacant; SF-10, SF-16 Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity. (Case M Z-1674) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Traffioi Transportation Engineering Department has no objection to closing Piney Creek Boulevard if a 30' private access easement is provided. Recom- mend off-site improvements to Colorado Boulevard to the railroad track. Utilities: sanitary sewer service to this devel- opment is not adequately available. Off-sits improvements may be imposed during the platting process. Ade- quate water, electric, gas, tele- phone, and cable T,V, services are available. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The Piney,Creek Boulevard issue precipitated an intense debate when the most recent change was approved in this area (December, 1981). The residents of Township IT were opposed to Piney Creek remaining open as potential access for mall traffic. Staff cited inadequate fire protection response time and an overall lack of sufficient access to the mall area as reasons for keep- ing Piney Creek open in 1981, The City Council approved the abandonment of Piney Creek Boulevard in conjunction with approv- al of an amendment to PD-6 on December 15, 1981, As part of the proposed plan, the petitioner is requesting that Piney Creek be reopened and utilized for public access; however, no connection with existing Township II is planned, Phase I or existing Township II would not be affected by through--traffic utilizing Piney Creek Boulevard for access to the mall area. At recent meetings the Planning and zoning commission and City Council approved the site plan for tho area of PD-6 immediately south of this request. The developer of that portion of the PD, the Henry S. Miller Co., requested that Piney Creek Boulevard remain closed; however, they have offered to grant Ms. Storer a 301 private access easement through the street. Both Ms, Storer and the Township II - Hopkins Hills Homeowners'Association feel that the 301 access easement would be an acceptable solution to the Piney Creek problem, Staff feels that the 301 private access easement is an acceptable compromise solution to a long standing problem. (Case Z-1674) Page Three TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (Continued) A former point of contention and current point of confusion is the approved status of an east-west residential street in Phase III whose alignment may permit access to Colorado Boulevard through the existing Hopkins Hills Addition. The site plan staff considers as approved in 19e1 shows potential access to Colorado Boulevard through existing Hopkins Hills Addition. The 1981 amended planned development (PD) ordinance includes a con- dition that Phase II of Township II not be changed. The only available minutes of City council action taken in 1981 includes a motion by a Council Member that "access to Colorado Boulevard be retained within the development". The neighborhood associa- tion is of the opinion that the site plan in effect today ould not allow access to Colorado Boulevard through the existinj1h neighborhood. Numerous plans have been submitted and documenta- tion of specific Planning and Zoning commission and city council action on this matter is limited. Based on available informa- tion, staff feels that the current approved plan does provide for access to Colorado Boulevard through the Hopkins Hills Addition. If the aforementioned connection is in fact permissible under the present plan, traffic on Hopkins Drive, Piping Rock and other internal residential streets will become a problem as ultimate development occurs. The proposed plan would better clarify street patterns and alignments and isolate Phase III of the development in a manner similar to that proposed in Phase II, Staff feels that this is an acceptable alternative that would have minimal, if any, impact on existing development. ZONING HISTORY Planned development (PD-6) was originally approved in September 1969 and has been subjected to a variety of proposed, rejected and accepted site plans and amendments. one site plan was I approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in 1973. In I August, 1980, Mr. Don Plunk, representing the Henry S. Miller Company, requested an amendment to PD-6 to permit single family, two-family, zero lot line and multi-family uses on property primarily designated for single family use on 80' x 130' typical lots (area north of Colorado Boulevard was designated for multi- family use with a maximum density of 18 units per acre), The Planning and Zoning Commission denied the petition in 1980 and no appeal was made to the City Council. In October, 1981, Mr. Plunk again filed a change in zoning petition for amendment i (Case # Z-1674) Page Four ZONING HISTORY (Continued) of PD-6 to permit single family, two-family and multi-family uses. Both requests by Mr. Plunk were heavily opposed by area residents; however, a 1981 amended plan was approved with the following conditions after considerable debate and compromise; 1. The developer shall extend one-half of Colorado Boulevard to the M.K.T. Railroad. 2. The remaining one-half of Colorado Boulevard shall be built by the developer as subdivisions occur along the south side of the proposed Colorado Boulevard. 3. A ten (10) inch sewer line shall be extended by the devel- oper to serve the site to be developed prior to the issuance of any building permit;. 4. The subject property shall be platted prior to any devel opment in accordance with City of Denton platting require- ments in effect at the time of such platting. 5. The location of tributary B to Pecan Cr.eok where the same abuts the east side of Phase I of Township II shall not be altered except to provide for necessary drainage. It is further provided that single family lots shall begin no closer than forty (40) feet east of the centerline of the existing creek. 6. The developer shall landscape the greenbelt between the ditch and the lot lines. 7. The density of the 18.5 acres of the multi-family tract shall not exceed twenty (20) units per acre. 8. The developer shall deed restrict the property; such restric- tions shall be compatible with existing deed restrictions. In June of 1983, the owner and petitioner approached staff' with yet another proposed modification to PD-•6.1. Staff commented on the technical issues and a formal change in zoning petition was filed in September, 1983. The neighborhood, staff, and the Planning and zoning commission were prepared to consider the proposed amendment to PD-6.1 on November 9, 1983 after a previous withdrawal. The owner of the property withdrew the request the day of the meeting after indicating that the property may be sold to a group of developers with ideas different from hors, The cage was again scboduled for Planning and zoning Commission action on February 22, 1984, and was once again withdrawn for the reason listed above. (Case N Z-1674) Page Five LAND USE ANALYSIS PD-6,1 lies within an area with low intensity designation, As a general policy, low intensity areas represent the primary hous- ing areas in the City with an emphasis on low density residen- tial development, Diversified housing is strongly encouraged in all areas of the City in several specific and general Develop- Ment Guide policies. i Some minor modifications could be suggested, but overall, the proposed PD amendment is not objectionable from a technical point of view. The average proposed density is approximately 6. units per sore which is within the moderate density/intensity level. The mixture of residential uses appears well balanced, and the cluster and single family detached (typical lot size 120Ix451) housing in both phases is proposed as a transition or buffering between abutting commercial and light industrial zoning and single family detached and duplexes, both proposed and approved. Duplex and cluster land use along Colorado Boulevard seems practical and far more restrictive than commercial, general retail, or multi-family uses that are typically proposed along major thoroughfares. One noteworthy recent oocurence related to the buffering issue is the approved petition of George Hopkins establishing SF-16 zoning on 14.619 acres located west of the subject site between light industrial, townhouse, and single family property. Mr. Hopkins' zoning change has had little impact on the technical assessment of the proposal but it could be construed as evidence that conventional single family zoning and development can co-exist with abutting light industrial zoning. The aforementioned proposed changes in street patterns and the related "containment" approach to traffic is considered an im- provement in comparison to the existing plan, In addition to improved buffering and transition, a substantial greenbelt would separate existing Township II from phase III of the proposed development. The Hopkins Hills Addition does not have the added protection of the greenbelt between it and abutting Phase III, however, the predominant land use proposed in Phase III is conventional single family detached housing on 801xi50' and 801x1201 lots. Typical lot size for proposed single family detached housing is comparable to existing development in the area. Typical size for single family detached (451x120'), compares favorably with I similar garden home or patio home type developments approved in other areas. The proposed duplex lot sizes (80,x120') exceed normal zoning ordinance standards considerably (601x1001). It is not felt 'that the cost of proposed housing will be in the low to moderate range. y'y (Case # Z-1674) Page Six NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT StaPf's major proUlem with thas request is based on the follow- ing rnetorical question: How many times should a neighborhood br asked or expected to meet and compromise with developers in order to achieve zoning that both parties consider acceptable? TI)-is issue was a concern in November, 1983, and February of this year and is still a concern of some at this point, Routinely, uut particularly in this case, staff strongly encourages peti- tioners and neighbors to work together In trying to devise an acceptaole plan prior to official zoning action. Because of past controversies and compromises, an attempt to reach a con- sensus on the previously submitted plan failed in September and November of 1983. In sum, there appeared to be little or no hope for a consensus or compromise in September and November of 1983 and February of 1984, This time there is hope that a different outcome will prevail. Several meetings have been hold with the developer ano the neignborhood association. The developer has made changes irr ner plan to accomodate the concerns of the neighuorhood associa- tion. It appears at the time of this report that the Township II - Hopkins Hills Homeowner's Association and Ms, Storer have reached agreement on the proposed plan. Attached to this report are a series of PD conditions proposed by the homeowner's Assoc: ation which the developer has reportedly agreed to. iECUMMENUArION Due to improved access and a superior plan for streets, PD zon- ing wnich permits strict site plan control and review, and a design that adequately separates existing Township 11 and Hop- kins Hills developments from proposed future housing, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of 1-16741 by a vote of o-U, with tie following conditions: 1. The location of tributary B to Hickory Creek shall remain unchanged where it abuts Phase 1 of ruwnsnip 11. 1, In uctn Phase it and Phase 111, the development of the sin- gle family (8U'x12U' typical lot size) area shall preede o: be concurrent witn the development of the single family cluster housing. (Case p L-1674) Page Seven RECOMMENDATION 3. Prior to or at the beginning of development of Phase 11, but in no case later than sixty (60) days after the issuance of a quitciaim deed Dy the City of Denton, the developer shall remove the existing paving of San Gabriel Drive from the point where it intersects Angelina Bend Drive to the point where it intersects ti)e cluster housing in the Phase .11 area. 4. The developer shall landscape all disturbed areas of the greenbelt as part of the development of Phases 11 and 111. D. Piney Creek Boulevard shall be re-opened for public use. e. Minimum 30 foot front, 7 foot side, and 10 foot rear yard setbacks snail be required. Specific site plan approval must be granted for cluster housing areas in Phase 11 and Phase III prior to final plat. approval and issuance of ouilding permits, 8. Developer snall be required to improve one half of Colorado Boulevard to the M,K,&T. Railroad track, 9. Developer snall install a 10" sewer line from her develop- ment up Woodrow Lane to the Pecan Creek twin, intercepter sewer lines, ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition with additional conditions 2. Approve petition witnout conditions Deny petition AfTACNMENTS E 1, Aerial 1. PD Concept Flan 3. Existing plan for PD 6,1 4. City Council minutes of Deceinuer 1~), 198a a, PO conditions proposed by homeowners' association 6. Reply form torals 7. Property owner list 8. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes for the meeting of August 8, 1984, 0731a _ ~ s 'j. ull'I. ~ ~ rFrr Ji• 4, y j w + v J , l e • ~Ir r ' 1 li ~ n •r 1. I r r. Iik w _ s fix'' ,r t . f j ; ja Vol y ~ \ YOIAk• UUM V40116 to C fAMiIY to to rp iE roy 4 fk. \ i 0 fQ1'A, SVM UNriS EE j BYM ~ trA 4604e 'A i. rOr AI SAM bV~•S - !C ~ /i"`~ , 7]t ~eS ai`i±r_~. OA 11_9 V rs__ ..ter' . / ~ 111 i~•F ~ ✓ ~ fr(• '"•.1.4VJ i \ :CU ITCH NOU9Np f l 2 At s T-CftiN~. M E M ~ OLX. \ \ echo t✓ pail! T YM ,rK •1. / e / EMR ►lAtIt 11 TOM~ if - Ole tJf► 1 edW1Y I QhTOM, T'1yM! Irm If 1 1 1N w'...~.~..1..1...~•.+.«••.........•.,«w.,.,,,, I I•.».N..rwl ..4w..... A N5(1 4 14 U ~ R 1 ' 1 ;,11 +Iw. ' n lriatptn(4*1414grM1114 ArlITS' TOWNSHP it Mr1t4MnlswlllliAk rtrr elreCo PA I1 ,,.,..1"•"`"-« ! I M NON •11111~1 11' / p' "T~"r•-+ 11 hIM Intl NI» P ,111 NIII INN owl". \ 00 IIII I y it r 1 }i , I 11 11 r 11~ n,~~ I , ~ N • I 1 pI • 4~SJ~,1•'r'u~f ll~!' ~ p~/~►~J~ •1, 11 ~ , / 11 11 . „ f I IIIN NNIM Ngll "j~ , ~ 1/ ~ II 1 Mlpylllrl ~H 1111 II wN ubQ VI / ~1' ~ r I) 1 ~ r ' 1 1 OMNIUMIIN H1I 11 NII ' - ~'1' ' MI♦1111 111NIwN r LN NI I 444,44,N INrI 1 •11 1~ ,11 1 / i i Jry~l, rN Iln N unl 'd 11 1 ' F1hf1,1 I II M NI I'/n rl NI 14 N Uq q ~ • 1 . • r1' 'I11 •1 1 a /N 11 ~ 1 '1, 11 , I. 1 .7 11 i „ I II > •If: fl'•i .1' u' ~ '.11 1 n' 1.1 ',1 1 , I I ♦ b `v 11 1 ' „a Iii 1 f I " ,1 X5•,11\,,,.I n, h \•i'~' ~ar / a /11 ' ' 1 1 II I I / y. .1 I bl ' •r 11 J'i I 11 1 ,'U ,5, , ~4 ~ V w N 11 • i^~ • r./ 1 v N o ' ~J ` i, , ' d II \ Q.. / r 141 11'! SJV NCACI/1 rh II'' !'7r ..,,rl I11 r` 5:\ 1~! i~ i fl •1 P ' '1~i1' 1*c,, ' 'I 1 off' 11i1 , i}CS ,v ~lir ' .~'~;\r ~h~ ,n '/lv ,I~ ~ i"y' rr~ O ,11 I ' 1 I.1 `I I~ 'il f . ' i /~r /r I I1~ y 1 /~~y, 'a/ I ' 11'1 ,f, 1 11 al :y. ~.1. fr . + I \ i.1\ ~ l' II I' ~1 I 1j LOl 01k I/IILIi1L ~Iq \l I I ' II •11 'li { '~i11 ~(`1. 1• rp \r1 .ll\'! % ~ 1 I 'k Irr 1 1 1+',. Ir i\':\ /'..)AI l~~ I' 1`~•, a1'll r' 1'~ 'r}` \ti, L,•1~~'r~l,1l': r~^•I ,1 \14, 1' 41 I• Ikk 35 7V:M~.INw~'1MrTM.ww. Pr,"wN1I Ne11t1r~..~.n..~. ry MwYh. '.W.~~ ✓ \ .T. ,.~w.1. v~w.~ ' ' 2 V,-'1.492, This s1.te plan was approved- by the City Council on 12/15/81, i C. Final Payments: 1, Approval of final payment for the Sycamore Street Bridge Modifica- tion. Final payment for the Sycamore Street Bridge Modification in the amount of $6,048,35 to Ashlar Contracting Co, approved. 3. Z-•1508, This is the petition of Mr, Oerald Heningsman representing Folsom Investments, Inc., requesting a change of zoning from single family (SP-10) to the Planned Development (PD) classification for two-family and multi- mily use. The parcel totals approximately 19.8 acres and is located along the east side of Hindle Drive between Denton Center and the Oood Samaritan Village. (This item was tabled by the City Council for 90 days at the public hearing 1.eld on September 15, 1981.) Mayor opened the hearing. Wayne Miller, Folsom Investments Attorney, submitted a revised plan for the acree,ge whi,:h he advised that density was reduced to 12.7 units per core And also we reduced apartments from 290 units to 232 units. Miller advised that an agreement was made for access land to Carroll Blvd. Charles Ridens, the spokesman for the property owners, of the area, said that a questionaire indicated that a majority of the residents oppose change from present si:igle family, though some would compromise. The concerns are: food control, tr,9ffic, area deterioration and decline of own property values. The Mayor called a recess for home owners to :aucus, Following the 15 minute recess, Oailey !action, Taliaferro second to pass the ordinance that has been "amended. On roil call vote Oailey "aye", Talia,ferro "aye", chew "ayeAlford 110 , Riddlesperger "no", Stephens "no", and Stewart "no". Motion failed u no - 3 aye. Hearing closed. 4. Public Hearingo: A. Z-1492. This is the petition of Mr. Don Plunk representing the Henry S. Stiller Company requesting an amendment to Planned Development (F;.-6). This portion of PD-6 is also known as Township II and begins approximately 1200 feet northwest of the intersection of Colorado Boulevard and San Jacinto Boulevard. The amendment would permit the following land uses on a tract totalling approximately 89,;1 acres; a. Single family (typical 80' x 120' lot), approximately 49.5 acres, b. Duplex (typical 80 x 120' lot), approximately 14.4 acres. c. Multi-family (20 units per acre), approximately 18.5 acres; d. Oreenbelt, approximately 7 acre3. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Judy Harper, Spokeswoman for re- sidents of Township II, stated that residents of Township IT support lion Plunk's petition. Mr. Plunk is a representative of Henry S. Miller Co. Plunk said they had met with Township II and Hopkins Hills residents continually, He added that his firm has proposed adoption of a plan to build one hall of Colorado Blvd. to its connection, It was pointed out that the Denton Fire Department was concerned about response time in case of fire in either subdivision. Hearing was closed, Galley motion, Chew second to retain access to Colorado Blvd. Motion carried unanimously. ADDENDA TO PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PD 6 I. The location of tributary B to Hickory Creels shall remain unchanged where it abutss Phase I of Township II. 2. The zoning of Phase II and Phase III shall revert to the plan adopted i n Dectambor, 1961 1 f development of at least, 25% of the single f ami I y lots (80x120 foot typical lot si•r.e) in Phaase II has not been completed by September 300 1986. In addition, the zoning of Phase III shall revert to the plan adopted in December, 1981 if development of at least 25% of the 4iing.le family lot=s (00!; 120 foot typical lot size) has not boen completed by September 30,, 1990. 3. In both Phase II and F1Iiaxe 1110 development of the single family (BOxi2p foot typical lot size) area shall preceed or be concurrent with the development of the single family cluster housing. 4. Prior to or at the beginning of development of Phase 11, but in no case later than 60 clays after the issuance of quitclaim by the City of Denton, developer mhall remove the existing paving of San Gabriel Drive from the point where it intersects Angelina Bend Drive and the point where it intersects; the clu+".tor housing in the Phase lI area. 5. Developer shall landscape all disturbed areas of the greenbelt as part of the development of Phase II and Phase III. 6. On saubmitting the? final plat, developer shall deed restrict the lots so that all lot owners pay a maintenance fee similar to that in Phase I deed restrictions. In addition, the lots will be deed restricted as follows'a Single family lots (BOx120 foot typical lot) shall have deed restr.i ct i ons3 compatible with those in Phase 1. Single family cluster housing shall have a ini ni mum of 1(.)0(:) square feet of air- conditioned living s3pace in each unit. In addition, the size of these units will be such that the average air conditioned living space shall be at least 1200 square feet, averaged over all units in the single family r.l s.sster housing area. Each cluster shall contain no more than 6 units. Single family lots (45x120 typical lot, Phase III only) shall contain at least 1200 square feet of air conditioned living space. i COMMENTS UN ADDENDA TU PD b Item 1. This requirement exists in the current PD b ordinance. In order for the property to be developed according to the proposed preliminary plat, the location of the creek separating Township II from tho now Phase 11 would need to be re-located from its present course. The current location of the creek approximates the location indicated on the proposed preliminary plat. Petween the existing housing and the current location of the creek, there is an extensive cluster of large trees on the greenbelt, The designated greenbelt in the original 1974 plan and the location of the creel:: showed this treed region to be preserved. The people along this region bought their homes based on this plan. In 19800 the creel; was widened without relocating its path. This necessitated the removal of all trees on the east bank, In 1981, the city cleaned Out the creek. This required the installation of 20' wide dirt roads on either side of the creek. In installing these roads, marry trees on the west side were removed. (Of course, that city has not been back to clean out the creek). Developer in 1981 agreed to the requirement of item 1, as a survey showing the exact location of the creek did not exist. Thins treed region of the greenbelt has undergone extensive damage from its original state because of periodic changes in the plan, This restriction presserve% some vestige of the original greenbelt concept on which many people invested their money. The exact location of the creek to preserve this treed area will require a new sup"Vey, 0and needs to be deferred until final plat. Item 2.~ The time restrictions are intended to eliminate "speculative" zoning. The original koninq for this property was mainly single family on I30x130 lots, and it was Under that plan that the ma,iori.ty of Liss bought oor homes In 1901 we agreed to an increase in density to get the area developed. We agreed to an increase in the apartment density from 11.5 acres to carver 18 acres, in the density of apratment units from 18 to 20 per acre, in the establishment of 1.4.51 acres of duplexes where single family had been, in a rc+durtion of the typical lot size from 8(1xl 3Q to R1,12:, and in a reduction in the greenbelt area from over 11 acres to 7 acres. This increase in density did not result in development - only an increase in the developer's profits. We will agree to a plan requiring an increase in density only if that plan reSL(Its in devU.lopment. We wi11 not agree to any plan which allows Just an increase in density followed by sale by owner followed by a rr=quest fear -Further density increase,. etc., etc. Item 3. This item is intended to provent the building of the high density cluster housing followed by abandonment of the plan. This is precisely what the prev.iau5 owner did in re-zoning for increased density, constrUCting only the Apartments, and then selling the land. item 4. This i teem is intended to make once ns to the mall through Township 11 impossible during the development of Phase II, and to eliminate as rapidly tan possible the frequont illegal use which is currently being made of San B abri el and Piney Gruel; for access to and from the mall. Item 3. A similar provision exists in the currant ordinances. 0 Item 6. These dared reztrictions are intended to insure than the new plan is ag compatible au poosible with existing single family hQU%I ng. Funding of a corporation to maiintain the greenbr«lt areas is a part of these deed restrictions. M PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL, Z-1674 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Mike Kozak John Garling 1432 Angelina Bend, 1208 San Gabriel Denton, Texas Denton, Texas V. W. Redman Mrs. W, N. Barrett 1101 Dallas Drive 1400 Angelina Bend Denton, Texas Denton, Texas + rr - 1 1O6 al Old 15 L. L+-.-.-._ !J 't4ntl ~Q rl+ 0 h Lilliarn fl. L c E09 oil I~i nA Pod wcar y sce 015 a 1(ra~9 "To • 7 C~dU II fl , a /OZ 08 4A) A~l - I ,a Odd PQ,+e r ao 5 rox 0 A I us.c: 0 A 'I i on I kr 1-lie, CI ";,I f C, Gi L.QZ LA 7 ~ Y c S L E am rr i 1) LOA 1 0 15 A r ~ ~ Cu.r 's 0..i e f e~bcr nat. V-C V Ll ^~~~SIAyI YMi~ ` ' e ~f S e K e O ~ C <c C I I L mCl- . C~-Fon I OU l ~r, ao f ti h Hl(lh 1r r) a AP r1~.1 Lo n T y-h e J 0 Au ~v F r I( I . {X~ n _1.1h,~.}c~,1iY1ct Ue.r~r~ a ~ ~ ~ f 5 f ~~JJJ._fJaL I~t y~ C f e,A~ .c'~s-L~.~ti -•SC:SL LL~ ~ ~ Q !)r"Ai ih g, f 1 I I 3,` a r S C rr r+' h r 1 6) ug. CL trous 1 SOA L,-% ' ~s coG 7 ~S_3 .o~ I Ne n u S, M' I l-_ ~ ~ r ~G r ~uo/ WnI f,' It a ll 1+ I1 II vy/~sf T ~/r r^ 11 z / `2 a 1 Wo. r. 10 C) au i ~t' 1.: .C~: rtU r~ Of1 0.l1 ~ 7; w P r rl //rt t ' Y 7.S x D i H , ~r r ~o.ab33~ 0G ~t4S 7s~6cn I V1 1 Y ~ L• J r i 3 ~ D~ P & Z Minutes Auyu$r d, 1984 page 2 E. Approval of the final plat of the Timberline Apartments Addition, F. Approval of the preliminary and final plat of the Canton Addition, G. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Osborne Grocery Addition. Gnairman stated staff has requested that the preliminary plat of the 0soorne Grocery Addition be added to the consent agenda. ,Ar, Claiborne made a motion to approve the consent agenda with the addition of the preliminary plat of the Osborne Grocery Addition, Seconded oy Mr, Escue and unanimously carried i6-0). Ill. Puolic Hearings A4 Z-1674. This is the petition of Jo Storer requesting an ` amendment to pianned development (PD-6) on a 58,2 acre tract located on the south side of Colorado Boulevard J6v approximately 1,500 feet northwest of Loop 288. If ~o approved, the PD amendment will permit the following IQ land uses; J~a Single family detached - 22 lots on 3.8 acres (typical lot size 120'x451) Single family detached - IU6 lots on 34.1 acres (typical lot size i2o'x801) Cluster Housing - 215 units on 18 acres t12 units per acre) Two family - 16 units on 2.3 acres Ms. Spivey stated there were 58 reply forms mailed to property owners within 2U0 feet of subject property; 2 were returned in favor, d in opposition, and i undecided. Ids. Storer stated on three different occasions she had met with the homeowners in the area to work out proolems and discuss ideas, She explained the site plan which includes cluster nousiog, tuwnhouses and single family housing. Sam Hoberts, employed by Oe5hazO, Starek and Tang, Inc., stated ne was representing the interest of the Henry S. Miller Company who owns the development to the south of the proposed. He explained the traffic impact along Piney Creek P 4 L Minutes August 8, 1984 Wage 3 and the trip generations of Township II, Phase III, He stated the Henry S, Miller Company is proposing a 30 foot two-lane roadway which is more than adequate to handle the flow of traffic, He stated they are in favor of the peti- tion, out would ask for a reasonable amount less than a 100 foot roadway as proposed. Ms. Storer stated she nad not addressed the Piney Creek issue, but woulu request the 100 foot rignt-of-way stay as it is, as it will serve as a beautiful entry to the proposed development, On question from Mr, Sidor, Ms. Storer answered no, this is not the only means of ingress and egress, however, it is a main ingress, but could also use Colorado Boulevard. Greg Edwards stated ne is the engineer on the project and has peen involveo with the revisions of the plan. He stated the most fears of the area residents were public traffic through their neighborhood enroute to the mall. He stated the proposd nas commercial ana apartment zoning adjacent to tnis property that we need to ouffer and protect, He stated they nave increased the area of single family and placed more dense development that would buffer from the existing single and multi-family developments. He stated they nave nad good input from the neighborhood residents. Mr. Sidor stated there seems to be 'l separate parcels of land and with no tie-ins to roads running east and west asked if tnis nas peen checked out with the fire department, Mr. Clark stated the proposed has been discussed at Development Review committee and is acceptable. On question from Chair, Mr. Edwards stated they did revise and enlarge the single family area as suggested oy the neighborhood association and changed the proposed duplexes to cluster housing. Christie Findley, a resident of Townsnip 11, stated everyone in Township li woulo love to see tnis area stay trees. However, sne stated sne has seen Ms, Storer's ideas, and says sne feels tney are good ideas and the land will sooner or later oe developed and sne feels no one would buy a large nome uordering the mall or the apartments on Colorado Boulevard, She stated sne is in favor of the proposed, P 6 L Minutes August 8, 1984 Page 4 Josepn Mancuso, a memoer of the faculty of North Texas State UnivHrsity, and a memoer of the neighbornood association commended Ms. Storer for compromising with the association and agreed it is the best proposal, not perfect, out the best plan she has come up %itn for the area, He stated no was in favor of the petition. Ted SKeKel, 1415 Angelina Send, stated ne had worked with the association, Ms. Storer and Mr, Edwardr> on toe modifi- cations and would iiKe to speak unofficially for the asso- ciation in favor of the petition. He skated one of the oig concerns the area is pleased with is the ending of San Gabriel or closing it off, He stated if the intent of the Uummission is to approve without the dead-ending of San Gabriel, the association would do a reversal, Ms. Spivey stated this is a low intensity area and is subject to Development Guide policies for low intensity areas, AS a general policy, low intensity areas represent the primary housing, areas in the city with an emphasis on low density residential development. Sne stated diversified nousing is strongley encouraged In all areas of the city in several specific, and general Development Guide policies. Sne stated some minor modifications could be made, but the proposed PU amendment is not objectionable from a technical point of view. Tne average proposed density is approxi- mately u,l units per acre which is within the moderate density/intensity level, Sne stated the mixture of land uses appears well 'valanced. She stated toe Hopkins Hills Addition dour not nave the added protection of the greenoelt uetween it and abutting Phase III, however, the predominant land use proposed in Phase lli, is conventional single fam- ily detacned housing on 6U' X 150' and 60' X 120 lots, She further stated typical lot size for proposed single family detached housing is comparable to existing develop- ment in the area, She gave the typical lot sizes of the proposed and stated it is not felt that the cost of the housing will be in the low to moderate range. She stated staff recommends approval of 2-1674 with 11 conditions. She also stated that condition two (Z) included in the agenda packet can not oe legally enforced and stated she would also like to add a condition. Mr, Escue asked if it would be appropriate to reword condition two (Z) to state if 25 percent of the single family lots in Phase ii have not oeen developed within three (S) years, it would come back to Planning and Zoning Commission for reconsideration. Minutes uyust 81 lyrjp age 5 Mr, Meyer stated yes, it would ue appropriate, Ms. Spivey stated regarding condition 6, where Piney Creek Houievard shall be reopened for public use or be privately maintained as a 3u' access eaaement, staff nas no opinion, However, troth alternatives have oeen approved by the traffic engineer. Mr. Sidor asked if approved to keep piney Creek open, wouldn't it De suojeet to perimeter street paving, Mr. Ulark replied, if tnis is not going to be a public street, just a private street with driveways, tnen the developer should maintain them instead of the city, Ms, Storer stated Piney Creek is the only thing sne wants to address, Sne stated she feels the area could stand a lot of space acid a lot of green and in her opinion, needs a 100 foot street with a parkway in the middle, And stated as she understands, will oe a puolic street, William LaRow, a resident of Township 11, stated he was in opposition as ne was told at the last association meeting that the property would revert back to the previous zoning. Tne intent of wanting the reversion clause he stated, was to provide an inducement for the developer to develop the land, L~nair declared the public nearing closed, Unair commented he was glad Ms. Storer has work out all the problems witn the association and he feels Piney Creek Boule- vard snould be a public str,it and maintained, He,also sta- ter if the Planning and Community Development Department dis- covers that condition 2 is illegal, it can oe struck as a condition, Mr. Escue made a motion to approve T-1674 with the following conditions as suggested by staff witn item 2 being ammended to read; 1. Tne location of trioutary 8 to Hicxory Creek shall remain uncnangeu where it abuts Phase I of Township II, 2, The zoning of Phase II and Phase III shall be reviewed oy Planning and Zoning Commission for possible rezoning if uevelopment of at least 2~) percent of the single family lots (80' X !2U' typical lot size in Pnase 11) nave not been completed in three (3) years, In addl- P 4 Z Minutes August 8, 1984 Page 6 tion, the zoning of Pnase Iii snail oe reviewed oy the Planning and Zoning Commission for possible rezoning if development of at least 25 percent of the single family lots (8u' X 1Zu' tyypical lot size) nave not peen com- pleted in three ls) years. S, in both Pnase II and Phase Ili, the development of the single family (8U' X 12U' typical lot size) area shall precede or be concurrent with the development of the single family cluster housing, a, Prior to or at the deyinning of development of Phase ii, out in no ease later than sixty (60) days after the Issu- ance of a quitclaim deed oy the City of Denton, the de- veioper snail remove the existing paving of San Gabriel Drive from the point where it intersects Angelina Band Drive to the point where it intersects the cluster nousing in the Phase II area. The developer shall ::crape all disturbed areas of the greenoelt as part of r oe,Pelopment Phases II and 111. b, Piney Creek Boulevard shall oe re-opened for puulic use, 7, Minimum 30 foot front, 7 foot side, and 10 foot rear yard setoacks snail oe required; larger setback require- ments may be incorporated into approved deed restrictions, 6, Plan approval shall constitute site plan approval for single family and duplex housing; nowever, deed restric- tion,cj compatible witn existing Township lI must oe sub- mitted f'ur review and filing prior to final plat appro- val, 9. Specific site plan approval must be granted for cluster housing areas in Pnase 11 and Pnase III prior to final plat approval anc, -.ssuance of building permits. IU. Preliminary and final plat approval based on the City of Denton's Subdivison Regulations and Land Development Code Snail oe i:equi'ed before issuance of building per- mits; all normal standards and requirements will apply unless expressly lraived oy the approved planned aevelopment (PL)) ordinance. 11. Developer shall be required to improve one nalf of Colorado Boulevard to the MKT Railroad track, P 4 Z Minutes August 8, 1994 Page 7 12. Developer shall install a 10" sewer line from her development up Wonurow Lane to the Pecan Creex twin intercepter lines, LSecgnded by Mr, Sidor and unanimously carried (6-0:. Mr, Mayer commented that the city at any time can initiate rezoning of any property, 8. Z-1682. This is the petition of Jo Storer requesting a change in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and SF-16) zoning classifications to the planned development (PD) classification on an 85,2 acre tract located on the east and west sides of Ridgeway Drive beginning approxi- mately 1,000 feet south of Interstate Highway 35E. If approved, the planned development will permit the fol- lowing land uses; 58.2 acres of single family (SF-10) detached land use (105 lots witn a density of 2.1 units per acre) 18 acres of single family (SF-16) detached land use (32 lots with a density of 1.8 units per acre) 17,6 acres of single family detached land use (iUo units with a density of 6 units per acre) 9.4 acres of single family attached land use ~4U units witn a density of 4.3 units per acre) Ms, Spivey stated there were 75 reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property; 2 were returned in favor, 8 in opposition and 1 undecided, Sne stated tnat Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council did approve a zoning case for Dimension Development (PD-19) and prior to approval, staff did an intensity study for this area, She stated Dimension Development did absorb all of the intensity on the east side of Ridgeway Drive, Sne further stated there has been no formal decision to move the intensity study boudary lines and since the Denton De- velopment Guide is in the process of being updated, staff recommends taoling Z-1682. Ms. Storer explained the proposed and showed pictures of otner areas in Dallas and Fort Worth comparable to what she is proposing to build, Sne stated it would ue called Southridge Place, (condo's and townnouses) and would have security guards on the property. She stated this is a village concept, Sne stated tnis is not a dense area and she doesn't intend for it to Ue dense. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL 7. . To: Denton City Council. Case No.: Z-1682 Meeting Date: September 4, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant; Jo Storer Rt. #1, Box 276 Argyle, TX 76226 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: change in zoning from the single family (SF-10, SF-16) zoning class.. ifications to the planned development (PD) classification, If approved, the PD will permit the following usest 1. 38.2 acres of single family (SF-10) detached land use (105 lots with a density of 2,7 units per acre). 2. 18 acres of single family (SF-16) detached land use (32 lots with a density of 1.8 units per acre). 3. 17,6 acres of single family de- tached land use (106 units with a density of 6 units per acre). 4. 9.4 acres of single family at- tached land use (40 units with a density of 4.3 units per acre). Location and Size: An 83.2 acre tract located on the east and west sides of Lillian Miller Parkway, beginning approximately 1,000 feet south of I.H. 35E Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Shopping center under construction; 2F, OR South - Vacant; PD-19 East - Vacant; SF-10, A West - Single family residential; SF-10, SF-16 Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity. (case # z-1682) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: There are some drainage questions to be addressed in this area, Storm sewer pipes will be required and some form of detention will, probably be required. As always, drainage mat- ters can be addressed during the platting stage of development. Transportation: The major traffic issue is the use of Lillian Miller Parkway, Lillian Miller Parkway has 80 feet of dedicated right-of-Way and a 24 foot section is under construction at this time, It is hoped that Lillian Miller Parkway will ultimately be redesignated as F.M. 2181 and acceptod as part of the state highway system. The Transportation Engineer is concerned that the integrity of Lillian Miller Parkway be maintaintAd. Public Utilities: currently existing water and newer lines are not adequate to serve the proposed development. NOW water lines must be provided. The de- veloper must either rebuild the Hobson lift station or build new gravity lines to connect with the State School sewer line. Eler,tric, telephone, gas and cable T.V. fa- cilities can be provided for the proposed development. ANALYSIS This 83,2 acre tract is located in a low intensity area. Ac- cording to the Denton Development Guide, low intensity areas repreaent the city's primary housing areas and should emphasize residential use. All of the land uses proposed are single family uses. (Case N Z-lbbi) Page 't'hree ANALYSIS (continued) On June 19, 1964 the laity Council approvea the plannod devel- opment zoning request of Dimension Development just south of the proposed development, The Intensity analysis prepared for G-lt~b (Dimension Development PD) indicates the zoning approved on that tract will utilize all of the available Intensity in this area. The staff report for that case specifically states the following: "It is strongly recommended that decision makers remain mindtul of the fact that all available intensity has been allocated it and near the corner of Ridgeway Drive and Teasley Lane; therefore, future pressures for higher intensity uses along this corridor should be rejected or Deveiopment lruide policies should be changed," The plan for this area was reviewed by the Development Review Committee on June 19, 1984 and the P1annl-ng and Community Development Department commented as follows; Intensity standard for area east of Ridgeway Drive has been filled to capacity by Dimension Development proposal approved on June 19, 1984 by City Council. Additional high intensity and higher density land uses (no matter how attractively designed) will not be recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Gouncil, Minimum reserve deve opment rights would permit low density (SF-.iU type) residential land use only if intensity is strictly enforced on east side of Ridgeway Drive," The areas shown on the attached concept plan as SF-lU and SF-1b are already in existence as such. It was the developer's wish to advertise all of the proposed development in order to make the neighborhood aware of the comprehensive plan for the area a,, a whole. The areas on the west side of Lillian Miller Parkway shown as single family attached do not violate the overall _intensity standard. r RECOMPIENDA'I'ION As indicated in the analysis above, all of the intensity on the east side of Lillian Puller Parkway was allocated to the Dimension Development proposal, 'rho Dimension Development proposal was over the intensity standard in the original study. The Dimension Company submitted a new intensity study with altered boundaries. 't'heir proposal. fit. within the standards of the altered intensity area; however, the boundaries of the intensity study area have never been formally changed to coincide with the revised boundaries of the Dimension Study. Therefore, sluff did not recommend approval of this case. (Case # Z-1682) Paige Four VECOMMENDATION (continued) Due to the amount of vacant land remaining in the area, staff recommended implementing interim Policy issue #1 in the proposed revisions to the Development Guide. That policy reads as follows; "The changing of an aroals intensity index standard is considered a mayor decision of the City and therefore increment- al planning activities and decisions that will change the cur- rent or projected intensity of an area should be tabled, time permitting, and a special intensity study of, that area should be referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission, The Planning and Zoning study will focus on the area's intensity question, addressing the need and impact of changinq an area's intensity index standard. The study recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for final action," The Planning and Zoning Commission felt that the size of this proposal would not have enough of an impact on the intensity of this area to recommend denial of this case, The Planning and Zoning commission recum- mends approval of Z-1682 by a vote of 4-2, ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve planned development with conditions. 2. Approve planned development without conditions, 3. Deny planned development request, 4. Table planned development request to allow time Cor special intensity study of the area. ATTACHMENTS 1, Aerial 'l, PD Concept Plan 3. Map of current intensity study area 4. Map of Dimension Development intensity study area 5. Reply form totals 6, property owner list 7. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of August 8, 1984 0195j ~ k ~If r r • tit t ; r / t' r rrr I f^'r " tLStW. r ! shy,, ~ ~r 14 ~t. I E . •S'yY ,t' iyrrl~~~,i• r '19 , a n 1 f 1 7 I f v+ _ / v } ~ ,'',•I ~fr v`~Y fl. .r, 11`v lit, { I j 1 t II' T.' n Y; r a rk rr hfe i t~1 "IC iih1 ~ Y ~Fiyyl, l~► -YJ'#i ti r i 11 g5, 1 fit t ~~.t y ~h ~j• Ir ~o r~'~ vA. A; atl r~i~ . ,t ,A '~r ~ i, f 1 too, -It ep~~ r v .ti vv •w6, r 1, 1,. ~'i `1 r l~ 9,.~ 1`I .1f~ ! 1 L'~I ~J~rEM„G.Irvllny ~f ~ r, t. 41' r 1 ~1, ~ k h 1pp '1 '1• YI; ~1 t i r l vFyle s ,.'h ! + Z ♦ 11 f t r M r 1 11 a. ~~f~ ~ ~pl~~t /1 i~(Y f I :.1~ r~ 11 ~ u ~~~~1~ ~1•~ {~~%A ~ i 1' t ~'Iy NQ ~ in fi \ Y 1 ~ ~ 14 ' • I ~1`• , 1 , If'v , 1~ rf ^ f~!. ! , a'..~ ,1. ,.rv le 4 f N 1 IS 1 ZON C., 58,_2. _ SF-1C) IO'iI_uh, ~ 7 18,0 5F Iq! '3 A 5F'Arrr intro 40 Un,t>'-- -a, x 1"1. -9f • n~_i~cirkn _ IU£, _...__.,._..__E<? O / r I" 40 S. F. 16 JWJE ! d ~t I S" S. F, IO ! LOCATION MAi- ~ 4 .r IIfs •~1 • n Li WTENSITY STUDY AAA 040 ,~Pb-49 SF- - S _-T _rr PD-16 \ \r\\ I A L I PD- 20 PD-45 = - PD-65 -S ro I 1 ! SCALE,-1 "=1000' H , , f , ~,,4 I 1 I I SR•16 91 1 00 0 STUDY AMA #40-A F S I I P0.1t; L 1 PO-45 PO, 20 AO•ss I I I r ' I I I ,t ~ _ _ _ y„ JI II i - - Po-se S-140 - ` ~ II I Nam ' Y I I I I I I SCALE: 1'~'1/~VVV r I+ ~ s ~ I SA 66 1 P06111 I • i r _ ~I_ . ~ I I pq~ I PO-54 2 PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1682 M FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED E. H, Sell J. P. McNeil 2212 Stonegate 2252 Stonegate Denton, Texas Denton,Texas Staley Faulkner Linda Stephens 2237 Stonegate 619 Ridgecrest Circle Denton, Texas Denton, Texas Kaye McCallon Fred Arrington 719 Ridgecrest: 601 Ridgecrest Denton, Texas Denton, Texas Douglas Ebersole W. D. Nichols 2244 Stonegate 1105 Skylark Denton, Texas Denton, Texas Mrs. Frank Jones 2256 Stonegate Denton, Texas Don E. Fletcher 615 Ridgecrest Denton, Texas R. B. Escue 707 Ridgecrest Denton, Texas Mrs. Ruth K. Munson 701 Ridgecrest Circle Denton, Texas Gale B, Lowe 2205 Hollyhill Denton, Texas JI ~,~I Z7612, C-G}Ot~ J, J, aC Aj/ 31 'K -c s- PY red 1( A r. Alo Alt A 24 G L Y ) 1 1 qgi Ob f 3 lseri s., r7 1 .2 A 6 ti C. Cn~n.~ ! U/1 A l~ ell) 0 tl,l Lai t °.r__ Jd,ii..ti d6 tsIr.. ~~h _~nSanh C rni i~Q 1 ' itijid At 6,4k AaAljA V 1 5 9 y ,l *f y ~ r dos' r 5144 AN) I I L. ,nos 7r. D r , AA we 7N1n1 q r 3036 r r, 1 A ' PP ? r -To TPAIII4601) Tr, R, P 6 r74' -2 A Cl Y'liL Xan A' I-AhI3 11oryot, 131:1 K~ 10 1 *rA loon 7 R , 3 ! 10A 4,o. A 0,0 A .4 r A 911 .2 z c ~ ^ 7~A Oka AA il N ~ `76.2 zi l + ? 0 r.4 /t , Lsr; ti_7r l1 P,, e n 9,( Ch, Alodeh 9 , ~.~cuiCirL~ 3 9 ' J) q 5' A ~l S ~l ,I 6 , s ~ ' 2 '76 + I 5f RdAhIJA ))g /J.5 4 10.0 j 7 411 I r r P e ~l 1 s << I6 .5 k I ),l 1,1,e rd I a SIB l . I Ic r, t7 ibe 11,0.1 --te, 7 rr ,2 S ! /lf3 S 1z Ajt)Ald5)n ~ ~ . ' N rr Co u , rr ~ rr ~r rr C' !r ir- r f r~i t d r vA, + Y %J c 14 r•° , ♦ t /I Z3 6 C*I.A^l we 1/ -6 I a X .7s.2-2,1 rat A '7 es • A 1 5' i t 7 6 a? i t r Alf, T, 1111( ~ 'r > '76 z r +7 17 r 2' t ! 13 a f7l, , '7 ! CIflil, yea Al;l r , LI ' r 16 R Ida -r t4 ball& O i' c 1 C 1 r s C~ 11 ' 6 , 1,0 L~ ~L < p % d , u 7 ~ , i P d Z Minutes August d, 1984 Page 7 12. Developer shall install a 10" sewer line from ner development up Woourow uaiie to the Pecan i;reeK twin intercepter lines, Seconded by Mr, Sidor and unanimously carried (6-0), Mr, Meyer commented that the city at any time can initiate rezoning of any property. d, rC-1682, This is the petition of Jo Storer requesting a change in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and JG9 SF-16) zoning classifications to the planned development ~r~an (PD) classification on an 83,2 acre tract located onethe east and west sides of Ridgeway Drive beginning ap ~a mately 1,000 feet soutn of Interstate Highway 35E, If approved, the planned development will permit the fol- lowing land uses; 58.2 acres of single family (SF-10) detacned land use (105 lots with a density of 2.7 units per acre) 18 acres of single family (SF-16) detacned land use (32 lets witn a density of 1,8 units per acre) 17.6 acres of single family detached land use (ioo units witn a density of 6 units per acre) 9.4 acres of single family attached land use (kU units with a density of 4,3 units per acre) Ms. Spivey stated there were 75 reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property; 2 were returned in favor, 8 in oppositior and I undecided. She stated that Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council did approve a zoning case for Dimension Development (PO-19) and prior to approval, staff did an intensity study for this area. She stated Dimension Development did absorb all of the intensity on the east side of Ridgeway Drive, She further stated there nas been no formal decision to move the intensity study boudary lines and since the Denton De- velopment Guide is in the process of being updated, staff recommends taoling Z-1682. Ms. Storer explained the proposed and showed pictures of other areas in Dallas and Fort Wortn comparable to what she is proposing to build. Sne stated it would oe called Southridge Place, (condo's and townnouses) and would nave security guards on the property. She stated this is a village concept, Sne stated this is not a dense area and sne doesn't intend for it to ue dense. P & z Minutes August 6, 1984 page 8 Mr, uharles Watkins, a planner with Fields, Edwards and Associates gave comparisons for the overall density and land use area, He stated there are 2750 generation trips per day. He stated tt%ere has been a lot of work done with the neignoornood and the developer is facing some time res- traints, Un question from Mr, Pearson, Mr. Watkins stated there is not a ;great deal of demand for SF-10 and SF-16 housing on today's market. He added, SF-10 and SF-16 tends to move ratner slowly, Mr. W,P, Pnillips stated he is an attorney in Denton and representing Ms. Storer, He stated his nome was the fourtn completed in Southridge and stated ne has lived there long- er than any family, He stated there has not oeen a oeign- oorhood association in Southridge for a long time, out Ms. Storer has done all to meet too recommendations of the neighoorhood. He stated the neighborhood is very excited auout Soutnridge Drive oeing developed to Ridgeway Drive, He stated the neignborhood had expressed concerns about the intensity on the west side of Ridgeway Drive and wanted the proposed moved to the east side of Ridgeway Drive, which Ms, Storer did. He stated most people ne nad talked to are excited about the proposal as they are single family homes and wanting Soutnridge to be developed, Mr, Mitchell Turner, a resident of Southridge, stated that the Denton Record Gnronicle stated staff would recommend tabling this request or there would oe a great deal of the Southridge people here to speak in favor of the proposed, He stated no felt it would not have much effect on the aensity. Richard Sims, a resident of Soutnridge, stated ne has been over to looi< at Ridgeway Drive and it's a very narrow street and will create a lot of traffic proulems, He stated he is concerned aoout traffic in the whole area. He is glad to nave another way in and out of Southridge, out i,, concerned with more development, it will increase the traffic flow. Ms. Spivey again stated staff recommends the request oe talled from the standpoint that Dimension Development has taken up all the intensity in the area. She furtner stated staff has no opposition to the type of land use, On question from cnair, Ms. Spivey stated the intensity study should take no longer than 6 weeks, P & Z Minutes August 8, 1984 Page 9 Mr. Sidor questioned isn't tnis out of order since this is a planned development. He asked it the Commission could not take action on the west side of Ridgeway Drive and table action on the east side of Ridgeway Drive, Mr. Meyer stated the request was advertised as a whole PD and not a partial, Mr. Watkins stated he would ask Commission to approve ratner than table or approve partially. On question from chair, Ms. Storer stated yes, she would a~~cept approval on any or all. Chair declared public nearing closed. Mr. ESCUe made a motion to table Z-1682 for six weeks until a new intensity study could be done. Seconded by Mr, Claiborne. Motion failed 2-4. (Ms. dole, Chairman LaF'orte, Mr, Pearson and Mr. Sidor voted no.) Mr. Claiborne commented tnat tnere will be a great pressure on the traffic on Ridgeway Drive and stated he is in favor of taeling until Commission can receive an intensity study, Mr. Pearson stated he would like to see the request pass, He feels it is a good plan and there are going to be pressures on Ridgeway Drive. Mr. Sidor made a motion to approve Z-1682, Seconded by Hr. Pearson and passed 4-2. (Mr. Escue and Mr., Claiborne voted r LL 0, L-1683. This is the petition of W. S, Nash requesting a change in zoning from the single family (SF'-7) classi- fication to the planned development (PO) classification on a 13.1 acre tract located on the west side of Stuart Road approximately 700 feet north of Windsor Drive. If approved, the planned development will permit the devel- opment of 96 zero lot line units (typical lot size 40' xllJ 1 ) , Ms. Spivey stated there were 29 reply forms mailed to prop- erty owners with 200 feet of the subject property; 1 was returned in faovr and 5 in oprosition, OWL NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDI- NANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE:. NO, 69-11 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 83,2 ACRVS OF LAND SITUATED IN THE JOHN ML'GOWAN SURVEY, ABUTRACT NO. 797, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST $;=3 OF LILLIAN MILLER PARXWAY BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET SOUTH OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35Ei TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY 'SF-10' AND 'SF-1.6' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -PD' CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTYI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY 08DAINSI SECTIOIJ I. That the Coning Classification and Use designation applicable to all or part of the property described as Tracts One and Two in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes is hereby changed from Single Family 'SF-10' and 4SF-16' District Classification and Use to Planneu Development -PD' District Classification and Use wide the Comprehensive •1 ~~rdinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II, The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as tin Appendix to the Coue of ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No, b9-11 be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use, SECTION 111, That the development of the property shall be in suostantial compliance with the comprehensive site plan attacned hereto arid made a part herein for all purposes, SECTION IV. That the city council of the city of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, anu with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a View to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens, SECTION V. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings haviny heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. Z-lb82/JO STOKER/PAGE I PASSED AND APPROVED this the QdY ok 1984, R;'HARD 0, STEWAKTi MAYOR CITY OF DENTONt TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTONo TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRISO ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS E3Y; I i 'L-1682/JC STOKER/PAGE 2 f' I E 1, D N 0 T 1: 6 Furst 1_rac3 All that cartain ,6,4f08 sere tract or parco', er Ian John MV00 41k SUV'O) .'Lstract 'lumbar 797i n situated in the Count' Ted Said tract being part of tl'c, tract described n deed f rom outhridge Asso- icn iation, e It';:. to American javings Asnociatj of Dallas ss recorded said tak eaG, pa'e 3 6 of "0 Deed Records of nenton County, Texasr fs0 a l i l d pta's ract Icing i;+orc f sll:' lescribe: hcr01n 1.}. elates enc hor.rnds as G e3 Inn LlcJ felt' thu r1osl 1101'11teri}' nnr:hweHt cornet' of the tract beii,g doscrihocr rurvin, an iron oln 'ound it tho northeast :nrner of ,Ot 1~' Dloc1 38 "thridhic as r,cr.u<iei! in volume p, age 33 a of L•ntorl p f the plat Records , 9'~:xas r Th,3nee the :ollowing calls along a south lino of aforementioned J8 Southrldge- Block South '10 degr.oes 14 minutes 56 o;econds East 33,1 feet, an Iron pill set, South 69 degrees 05 minutes Easa 108,38 feet, an iron pin set, south degeeos 45 minutes 50 reconds Cast 110,8 feet, a found iron pin, South '15 deg*ees 31 minutes 24 reconds East 116,61 feet, an iron pin uet, South U degrees 27 minutes 04 ;reconds bast 115,3 feet, an iron pin set, South 119 degrees 46 minutes 24 reconds vast 142.4 feet, an iron pin set, North J4 degrees L4 minutes 06 .seconds Past 143,0 feet, an iron pin set, Nort7 ii9 degrees 25 minutes 36 seconds East 140.0 feet, an iron pin set, North 69 degrees 53 minutas 46 seconds Cast 140,2 feet in "S" in electric box, North 56 degrees 39 minutia 37 seconds past 126,8 feet, an iron pin found, North ii6 degrees 30 minutas 12 seconds ;last 126,83 feet, An iron pin '.ound, and North .15 degrees 17 minutas 17 ueconds :last 191.04 feet to an iron LL:i :ound Ln the northwist line of So'ithridge Drives Thence Nort.l•. 38 degrees 05 minutes 14 seconds west 312,88 feet with the northeast houndar,, line of Southridg.a Drive to the most south corner of Lot 22, Blprk 4 oi' Southri3ge as shown by,plit recorded in volume page 51 of the PLrt records of Denton County, Texasr I Thence the following calls with the occupied back of lot line of said f Block 4- North 30 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds .ass 134,32 feet, a found iro% pin, North 38 degrees 58 minutes 30 seconds :ast 227,2 feet, an iron pin set. North L7 degrees 40 minutes 31 seconds Past 89,27 feet, an iron pin set, North e7 degrees 16 minutas 5o seconds ast 313,L feet, an iron pin foum.l and North 39 degrees 17 minutes 17 seconds Past 302.24 feet, an iron pin sett Thence Sr,ul.h 01 d+grees 08 minutes 45 seconds East 445.08 feet to the southwest r:orner )f Lot 8, Block 2, Erwin Sua-divisions Thence North 89 degioes 46 minutes 11 seconds East 309,89 feet with the south line of the Erwin Subdivision to an iron pin at the northwest corner of it tract convoyed to the City of Denton, by deed of record in Volume 1340, page 223, in said deed records for northeast corner of thisi I L-1682/EXHIBIT "A"/PACE 1 OF 3 • Thcncc rite :aost the l line of said City Of f)ghton tract Hlth a cegurvesto eft dlth a radius of 757,61 font, a central angle Of 30 dree 19 minutou 16 sacotlals, a tangent of 204,10 ^eet for A distance of 398,63 fc: t LO art iron pin sat At t:ne end Of laid curve, and South 48 degrvgs 4P °tnutr,s 03 soconcls I%'est 16.23,2" feet to the south line of SAW !':r'ovnn ;U1°,clyr Thonce sO.r:h 88 .v,lrees 4." minutes 15 seconds Pest 1743,96 feet with the (1est, .1ne of a tract conveyed to Marmon by deed of record in Vol me 46„ . pane 143 in se:cl Deou ttecorcls to the southwest corner of thIA dill 1'.Ut'thwL it corner of %a Id Harmon tract, 11) Iron pin Sett Thence ::orr.11 00 ,:e ircas 3.1 minutes 46 secnn::s ,e.3t 419,24 feet to an iron p.lr. ?I, ti:C 1101,t t2113t Qo1,n(I ,•,f `he Ll'.1;'t ,ieacY:heJ to deed ficm IC11013 I:Q ise: ,1!1 ~il ll!~,11) ,1 S I', .'0 t't4 I'nencC tf.C 71 lOt. l1'. ! 11N lCl1 l d sout!1 and ea:.t ; Inc: o° . CsU tt1T 1\'Qf as recordcc Ir. !,'oiul,c sue: 33, in the Plat Itfcords of said County; ;lorth 88 dources 3F rinul;os 10 seconds Cast 47, set, 2 feet, an iron pin ;dnrtil Oi uegrees 2:: minul:es 20 secondu Lest 139, 2 feet, an iron pin a t,t, „crth 87 dectrevs 5o minutes 30 seconds Past 12,2 foet, an iron pin set in the south line of Lynhurstf P;or.h 12 dectrees 44 r,inules 20 soconds East 168.3 feet, an iron pin sot, PtOrth 25 decrees ?(1 minutes East 103. feet an Iron pin set, :torch 43 decrees 21 minutes 10 seconds East 128,n feet, an iron pin set, 2;orth 33 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds East 109,0 feet, an iron pin set In the south line of Ho 11yhill Drive, and with arc of curve, whcse chord bears South 69 degrees 32 minutes 45 seconds East 56.64 feet to an iron pin in the south line of Rollyhill Drive at the end of said curve, and Horth 24 doc:rees 04 minutes 20 seconds EASt 195,0 feet to the place of Leoinninct. Z-1682/EXHIBIT "A"/PAGE 2 OF 3 F I E L D N O T E S Second TraC, All of 'hat certain 17,6480 acre tract or )areal of land, a tart of the john MoOowan Survey, Abstract Number 797, in the City of Denton, Banton County, Texas, and being the East part of that certain tract described in deed from Wott=an, Trustee to Denton Residential N.V. by deed of record in Volume 986, page 923, in the deed records of said County, and Commencinv at the southeast corner of the Denton Residential tract mentioned above, the south-east corner of said 111crowan Sur. vey, an tron Din; Thence South 88 degrees 40 minutes 15 seconds West 1049,45 feat to the nolnt of beptnning; Thence South 88 degrees 40 minutes 15 seconds West 1112,7 feet to iron Din set at the southeast corner of a tract conveyed to the City of Denton by deed of record in Volume 1340, page 223, in said deed records for southwest corner of this, an iron pin for corner; Thence with the eastline of said City tract North 28 degrees 49 minutes 03 seconds Fast 1153,59 feet to a point for corner; Thence •eith a curve to the left with a central angle of 30 degrees 07 minuu:s 08 seconds a radius of 904,55 feet and whose chord bear: South '6 dep.rees 14 minutes 31 seconds East 470.04 feet a total arc distance of 475,5() Feet to the e,.id of said curve; Thence ';girth 88 deeress 41 minutes 55 seconds East :.8,14 feet to a point. Thence South 02 degree,,; n4 r,imites 25 Seconds Fast 875.24 feet to point (,0 beginning Z-1682/EXHXBIT "A"/PAGE 3 OF 3 Afilil, 7.6NIC pl,r ~B SF- ID 10i farm 7 18 0 iF ICI 3? I,~ )./1 >f nlr,Yl/cn 40 U,,I•,! N 11.6 c, ,f n. ral llri i f<X, ~ 3. e, - +6 .wnl r c. ~r. a N IS) r` \ if I. c "'CCC ` 11 * V ~l y 5. F ylyl I f e J i~ I ~n! 4 NO, AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE AND ENACTING A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDI- 14ANCE FOR THE PROPERTY HEREIN UGSCRIdEeJ AMENDING TIE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON BY ORDINANCE NO, 69-1 TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN CONING CLASSIFICATION ANU USE DESIGNATED FROM SINGLE FAMILY 'SF-10" TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 'PD' DIHTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE AS SAID PLANNED DEVELOPMENT URDINAN::E AND ZONING MAP APPLIES TO 16147 ACRES OF LAND LOCA,rEe AT THE INTERSECTION OF TEASLEY LANE AND LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINi AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COLNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN'1TON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAI148: SEhTIUN 1. That the existing planned development district zoning ordi- nance applicable to all or part of the property described as Tracts 1 through 10 in Exhibit "A' attached hereto and mace a part hereot for all purposes, is hereby repealed in its entirety and there is hereby enacted a new planned development district ordinance anu comprehensive site plan of said property. SECTION II. That the zoning classification and use uesignation appli- cable to any or all of the property described as Tracts I through 10 in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and mace a part hereto for all purposes is hereby changed from Single Family "SF-10" District Classification and Use to Planned Development "PL)" District Classification and Use, SECTION 111, Tf,at the property described herein and designated herein as a planned development zoning district shall, prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building thereon, comply with the following conditions: 1, That SidewalKS meeting the city's standards ano specifications be installed on at least one side of the streets throughout the development, SECTION IV. The development of the property shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of DIMton, Texas under ordinance No, 69-11 be, and the same is hereby amended to show such cnange in District Classification and use subject to the above conditions and specifications. SECTION V. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, nereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive Z-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 1 plan for tnu purpose of promoting the general welfare of the city of Dentonr Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the inaXimum benetit to the city of Denton, Texas, and its citizens, SECTION VI. That this ordinance snall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and appruval, the required public hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984, RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CI SECRETARY CITY OF DEN'ION, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D, MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS B Y : Yy' vti w R 'L-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 2 292 TRACT 1 9einy part of a 161.66-acre tract of land as shown on a survey for Dimension Development Company by Espey, Huston i Associates, Inc, dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described as follows COMMENCING at the lntersectlon of the easterly line of F,M, Highway 2181 and the south line of sold 161.66-acre tractt THENCE along sold south 1lne, South 88023'46" East, 381.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE North 0024'20" West, 622,14 feet to a point In the centerline of a proposed road (60 foot right-of-way at that p0int)l THENCE along sold centerline, South 89044137" East, 773.90 feet to the beginning of a curve to the rightl THENCE along said curve, an are having a central angle of 14005121", a radius og 530.00 feet, a length of 130,33 feet, and a chord which bears South 82 41'56" West, 130.00 feet to the end of said curvel THENCE South 72035'23" East, 80.35 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 12050'51", a ra$lus of 300,00 feet, a length of 67,27 feet, and a chord which bears South 79 00145" East, 67.13 feet; THENCE leaving said centerline, South 0046'57" West, 594.28 feet to a point In the south line of said 161.66-acre tract; THENCE along said south Iine, North 88023"'6" West, 1033.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 15.00 acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" Z-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 1 292 TRACT 2 Part of a 161,66-acre tract of lend ns shown on a Survey for Olmension Oe w lopment Company by Espey, Huston 4 A~isoclates, Inc. dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described a4 followst COMMENCING at the intersection of the aasterly line of F,M, Highway 2181 and the south line of said 161,66-acre tractl THENCE along said south line, South 88023'46" East, 38144 food THENCE North 0°24'20" West, 622.14 feet to the POINT OF 9EOINNING, said point balm In the centerllno of *proposed road (60 foot rlght-of-way at that polmt?l THENCE North 0°24'20" West, 575431 feet to a point; THENCE North 89°19'59" West, 360.90 feet to a point in the centerline of proposed Ridgeway Drive, said point being on a curve to the right; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 8°46'05", a radius of 1000.00 feet, a length of 153.04 feet, and a chord which bears North 25°35'07" East, 152.89 feet to the and of said curve; THENCE along sold centerline, North 29°58'11" East, 469.50 feet to the centerline Intersection of Ridgeway Drive and a proposed road (60 foot right-of-way); THENCE along the centerline of the proposed 60 foot road, South S9051'12" East, 165.50 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 21033'55", a radius of 325,00 feet, and a length of 122-32 feet to the end of the curve; THENCE South 38017'17" East, 351.34 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along sold curve, an arc having a central angle of 51°06'11", a radius of 520 feet, and a length of 463.80 feet to the end of the curve; THENCE South 89°23'28" East, 39,;9 feet to a point; THENCE leaving said centerllne, South 1035'27" West, 156.58 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve, aii arc having a central angle of 29053'19", a radius of 260.00 feet, and a length of 135.63 feet to the end of the curve; THENCE South 28°17'52" East, 89.47 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; EXHIBIT "A" Z-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 2 THENCE along said curve, an arc havlng a central onglo of 58°24'45", + radius of 160.40 feet, and a length of 163.12 feet to the and of the curvei THENCE South 86°42'37" East, 15.87 feet; THENCE South 0°46'57" west, 93.64 feet to a point in the centerline of a proposed 60 foot road and a curve to the right; THENCE along sold centerline and curve, an arc having a central angle of 12 50151", a rodlus of 300.00 feet, a length of 67.27 feet, and a chord which bears North 79°00'45" west, 67.13 feet to the end of 0o curvei THENCE North 72°35'23" West, 80.35 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along sold curve, an arc having a central angle of 14005121", a radius 04 530.00 feet, a length of 130.33 feet, and a chord which bears North 82 41146" West, 130.00 feet to the end of curve; THENCE North 89°44 37" West, 773.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 17.12 acres, more or less. 292 TRACT 3 Being part of a 161.66-acre tract of land as shown on a survey for Dimension Development Company by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc. dated March, 1984, and being more paeticularly described as followss BEGINNING at the Intersection of the easterly line of F,M. Highway 2181 and the south line of said 161,66-acre tract, said point being on a curve to the left; THENCE aloe ine, an are having a central angle of 13 0 26151n, a radius of said easterly 1 761.20 feet, and a length of 178,66 feet, and a chord which bears North 14 02121" West, 178.25 feet to a point In the centerline of proposed Ridgeway Drive (80 foot right-of•way)i THENCE along said centerline, North 1004`17" blest, 637.78 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the right; THENCE along said curve and centerline, an arc having a central angle of 22 16122119 a radius gf 1000.00 feet, a length of 388.73 feet, and a chord which bears North 10 03154" East, 386.29 feet to a point; THENCE leaving said centerline, South 89019'59" East, 360.90 feet to a point; THENCE South 0024'20" East, 1197.45 feet to a point In the south line of said 161.66-acre tract; THENCE North 88023'46" West, 381.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 11.44 acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" 2-1660/RO13ERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 3 292 TRACT 4 Being part of a 161.66-acre tract of land as shown on a survey for Dlmenslon Development Company by Espey, Huston i Associates, Inc. dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described as followst BEGINNING at a 1/2-Inch Iron rod at the most northwesterly corner of said 161,66-acre tracts THENCE along the most northerly line of said tract, forth 89049'59" East, 935.00 feet to a point in the center of proposed Ridgeway Drive (80 foot right-of-way); THENCE along the centerllne of said Ridgeway Drive, South 29058'11" West, 528,29 feet to a point at the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along sold centerllne and curve to the left, on are having a central angle of 28 10'48", a radlug of 1000.00 feet, a length of 491,84 feet, and a chord which bears South 15 52'46" West, 486,90 feet; THENCE leaving said centerllns, South 89049'59" west, 541.15 feet to a point in the west line of said 161.66-acre tract; THENCE along sold west line, North 0036'41" East, 924,89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 14.80 acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" 1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 4 292 TRACT 5 Being part of a 161.66-acre tract of land as shown on a survey for Oimenslon Development Company by Espey, Huston t Associates, Inc, dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described as follows COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said 161.66-acre tract; THENCE along the most northerly Ilne of said tract, North 89049'59" East, 935.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point being In the centerline of proposed Ridgeway Drive (80 foot right-of-way); THENCE along said northerly Iine, North 89049'59" East, 2209,54 feet to a point; THENCE South 0046112" East, 708.56 feet to a point In the centerline of a proposed 60 foot road; THENCE along said centerline, North 89023'28" West, 1393.19 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 51006'11", a radius of 520.00 feet, and a length of 463.80 feet to the end of curve; THENCE North 38017'17" West, 351.34 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve, an' are having a central angle of 21033'55", a radlus of 325.00 feet, and a length of 122.32 feet to the end of curve; THENCE North 59051'12" west, 165,50 feet to the centerline intersectlon of said 60 foot road and Bald Ridgeway Drive; THENCE along centerline of Ridgeway Drive, North 29058'11" East, 58.79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 30.49 acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" Z-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 5 292 TRACT 6 Beingg pert of a 161.66 -acre tract of land as shown on a survey for 0lmension Oevelopmnt Company by Espoy, Huston 6 Associates, Inc. dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described as followso COMMENCING at the Intorsectlon of the easterly line of F.M. Highway 2161 and the south line of sold 161.66 -acre tract; THENCE along said south line, South 88023'46" East, 1415.13 feet to the POINT OF SEGINNINGI THENCE North 0046'57" East, 687.92 feet; THENCE North 86042'37" west, 15.87 feet to the beglnning of a curve to the rlght; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 58024'45", a radius of 160.00 feet, and a length of 163.12 feet to the end of curvet THENCE North 28017'52" west, 89.47 feet to the beglnning of a curve to the right; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 29053'19", a radius of 260,00 feet, and a length of 135.63 feet to the end of curves THENCE North 1035'27" East, 156.58 feet to a point In the centerllne of a proposed 60 foot rood; THENCE along said centerllne, South 89023'28" East, 1117.73 feeti THENCE leaving said centerline, South 1008106" west, 468.43 feet) THENCE South 88028'25" East, 432.01 feet; THENCE South 1008'13" west, 38.03 feet to the beglnning of a curve to the right; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 54035'49", a radius oS 160.00 feet, a length of 152,46 feet, and a chord which bears South 34 04141" East, 146.16 feet to the end of curve; THENCE South 6046'49" East, 40.22 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve, an are having a central angle of 66041'14", a radius of 90.00 feet, and a length of 104.75 feet to a point of reverse curve; EXHIBIT "A" Z-1660/RUBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 6 1 THENCE along a curve to the right, an are having a central angle of 74 50151", a radius of 110.00 feet, and a length of 143.70 feet to the and of curve; THENCE South 1022'48" west, 61.82 feet to the beginning of a curve to the lefts THENCE along said curve, an are having a central angle of 29036'13", a radius of 200.00 feet, and a length of 103.34 feet to the end of curvet THENCE South 28013'25" East, 168,90 feet to a point In the south IIns of sold 161,66-acre tract; THENCE along said south line, North 88023'46" West, 1664.48 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 35.00 acres, more or less. 292 TRACT 7 Being part of a 161.66-acre tract of land as shown on a survey for Dimension Development Company by Espey, Huston $ Assoelatas, Inc, dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described as followst BEGINNING at the Intersection of the easterly right-of-way of F.M. Highway 2181 and the west line of sold 161,66-acre tract; THENCE along sold west IIna, North 0°36'41" East, 209.62 feet to a point; THENCE leaving sold west Tina, North 89°49'59" East, 547,75 feet to the centerllne of proposed Ridgeway Drive (80 foot right-of-way), said point being on a curve to the left; THENCE along said centerline and curve to the left, an are having a central angle of 2°51'39", a radius of 1000,00 feet, a length of 49#93 feet, and a chord which bears South 0 21'36" Wast, 49.93 feet to a point at the and of said curve; THENCE along sold centerllne, South 1°04'17" East, 197,27 feet to a point at the centerllne Intersection of said Ridgeway Drive and proposed Teasley Lane (90 foot right-of-way); THENCE along centerline of said Teasley Lane, North 89°44'37" West, 434.91 feet to a point in the easterly IIne of F.M. Highway 2181, said point being on a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve, an are having's central angle of 9°17'09", a radius of 761.20 feet, a length of 123 37 feet, and a chord which bears North 73°58'45" West, 123.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and contalning 3,05 acres, more or less. EXHI132'T "A" 'L-1660/RO13ERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 7 292 TRACT 8 peinq part of a 161.66-sore tract of land as shown on a survey for Dimonslon ve opment Company by Spey, Huston i Associates, Inc, dated March, 19849 and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Intersection of the west line of said tract and the easterly right-of -fay of F.M. Highway 21819 said point being on a curve to the rlghtl THENCE along sold curve, an arc havlnq a central angle of 9°17'09", a radius of 761.20 feet, and a length of 123 37 feet to the POINT OF 1ECINNING, said point being on the eenterline of proposed Teasley Lane (90 foot right-of- way); THENCE along said centerline, South 89044'37" East, 434,91 feet to the contertlne Intersection of sold Teasley Lane and proposed Ridgeway Drive (80 foot right-of-way); THENCE along centerline of said Ridgeway Orlve, South 1004117" East, 440,51 feet too point In the easterly line of F.M. Highway 2181, said point being on a curve to the leftl THENCE alongg said curve, an are having a central angle of 48034'22", a radius oS 761.20 feet, a length of 645.31 feat, and a chord which bears North 45 02158" west, 626,16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.55 acres, more or less, EXHIBIT "A" Z-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 8 292 TRACT 9 Balm9 part of a 161.66-acre tract of land as shown on a survey for Dimension Development Company by Espey, Huston E Associates, Inc, dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at the westerly northeast corner of sold 161.66-acre tract; THENCE South 0046112" East, 708,36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, sold point being In the centerline of a proposed 60 foot roadl THENCE along sold centerllne, South 89°23'28" East, 195.76 feet; THENCE leaving sold centerllne, South 1008'13" West, 415.35 feet; THENCE North 88028'25" West, 432.01 feet; THENCE North 1008'06" East, 468,43 feet to a point in the centerline of a proposed 60 foot ra di THENCE along sold centerline, South 89023'28" East, 236.28 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 4.68 acres, more or less. EXHIk3IT "A" Z-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 9 292 TRACT 10 Being part of a 161466-acre tract of land as Shown on a survey for Dimension Development Company by Espey, Huston B Assoclotes, Inc. dated March, 1984, and being more particularly described as followsr BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said 161.66-acre tract; THENCE along the south line of said tract, North 88023'46" West, 481.77 feet; THENCE leaving sold south line, North 28013'25" West, 168.90 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; THENCE along sold curve, an are having a central angle of 29036'13", a radius of 200.00 feet, and a length of 103.54 feet to the end of curve; THENCE North 1022'48" East, 61.82 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve, an arc having a central angle of 74050'51", a radius of 110.00 feet, and a length of 143.70 feet to a point of reverse curve; THENCE along a curve to the right, an arc having a central angle of 66 41'14", a radius of 90.00 feet, and a length of 104.75 feet to the end of curve; THENCE North 6046'49" West, 40.22 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; THENCE along said curve, an are having a central angle of 54035'49", a radius OS 160.00 feet, a length of 152.46 feet, and a chord which bears North 34 04141" West, 146.76 feet to the end of curve; THENCE North 1008'13" East, 513.38 feet to a point In the centerline of a proposed 60 foot road; THENCE along said centerline, North 89023'28" West, 195.76 feet; THENCE leaving sold centerline, North 0046'i2" West, 402.45 feet; THENCE North 89049'15" East, 1013.43 feet; THENCE South 0020'14" Wait, 1589.72 feet to the POINT Of BEGINNING and contalning 28,53 acres, more or less. EXHIBIT "A" Z-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 10 ' i t i' ~ fl 1 J ~ '1 l; l`~1 'J,~'1 ,i .`1 '~~,.I ~~y~/~ .I /f\ , 1 i•'`I Q.~~' Sr'~ y t t 1 t. ,~,t , •1 1~ ~ ' li f ~ , ''y ''/Ll--~.J.~'....L ~:...1 L. , /1,'1,+ i '%,~1 f!1 'l !;I, '1'`, .~1~ '!J ~I'~y, ~ 1 ' ''1' F,1 '1 1j, I / t ' 1 ~ ; M","7'~: p~1 , ~ /1 , i 1 r 1~ mss' ~ f ~ r r ` I}~ ` ' • r► 1W~y ~.YN. Nr 1~1r .1t1 ,~\'S1 ,'\'\,'\,',i' i 1, , / 1'.. ''lt '~'1 .r/'~~, L ` -.y 'val.. _ 1''~ ' I"•S• i~NV it , i+-;t"F .i ' 'I 1 ` ' ' r' L `l\ ~'1; •i C4r 1, l II f' ' 1% ~ 4't` 1 1~W i} ~\1 / ` r1 f:,i' :il W~Mwll Ii!! II t' ` t IN ~ '1''t~ rr { 4«wN ft" 11,411' I 1 .1 „I 0-10MwoN A 64.44 M IWhIwaN SON / }}ff uaN O Ip10f11Cf Ifylllll:- 0.04 ~ 1 / JJ t`~f✓^•:;::'• NNrr.k:.H'uu.l E 1,41 L.,; , r•.•,.~i \ 'r 11 q.l t0.~ MCA US NN NN aN. AaN I 44 PROPOSED Z IL;N.S1ON Dri.y iiA .01'IVI E N`l' COMPANY 4M11N WK,rINNINYI II,•NI~.-1~, ; -~I. f i CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: August 29, 1984 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Fanning, Comprehensive Planner SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 4.16, PARAGRAPH (A) OF THE SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The attached proposed amendment is required in order to make our subdivision iules consistent within both the City and the extratetriturial jurisdiction. Currently there is no minimum lot size in the ETJ. This amendment will impose a minimum size on residential development which is consistent with subdivi- sions within the city limits. This is not an attempt to control land use in the ETJ by grant- ing or denying plats based upon the proposed use. The proposed amendment merely regulates the proposed use in regard to lot area regulations, Steve F nnin av 078"a NCI AN ORDINANCE AMCNDINO APPENDIX A TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, KNOWN AND CITED AS THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY - (A) RELATING TO AMENDING TSIZE,IwIDTH AND RDEI, ARTICLE 4.161 VTH REQUIREMENTS FOR PARAGRAPH SUBDIVISIONS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I, That Appendix A, Article III, Chapter IV, Article 4,16, Para- graph (A) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, heretofore effective, is P,ereby amended to read as follows; 'Article 4,16, Lots, Common Areas and Facilities. (a) Lot Size, The size, width and depth of lots snall conform to the zoning requirements for the area, If there are no zoning requirements for the area, the size, width and depth of lots for a particular land use Shall conform to the requirements for such USe pursuant to Appendix B, Article 19 of the Denton City Code.• SECTION II.' That Paragraphs (B), ICI, (D) and (E) of Article 4,16, Chapter IV, Article III of Appendix A to the Code of Ordinances Of the city of Denton shall remain unchanged, SECTION III, That this ordinance shall be effective immediately after its date of passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 10641 't2lC.iiARD 0. ~;:.'riARir t1AY0R CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTi CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRE'T'ARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVtD AS TO i,~>GAL FORM; JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF D/ENTTO[N, QTEXASf / Q~ BY: • Lt c CITY COUN"IL AGENDA BACK-UP SUHMARY SHEET MEETING DATEi Soptember 4, 1984 SUBJECT: Adoption of an ordinance and service plan annex- ing approximately 31.335 acres of lanel located on the east side of F',M. 2164 (North Locust Street) and west of the V-:in Lakes Mobile Home Park (A-5). SUMMARY: This property located between North Locust Street and the Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park has been voluntarily requested for annexation. The property owners intend to develop a mobile home park at this Site and are seeking mobile home park zoning for the property. The request for a zoning change from agriculture to P.D. (Mobile Home Park) is scheduled for the September 12, 1984, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting (Z-1684). Adoption of they accompanying ordinance and serv- ice plan will accomplish annexation of the 31.335 acres shown on the attached map. ACTION REQUIRED, Adoption of the ordinance and service plan (REQUIRES SIX (6) AF'F'IRMATIVE VOTES.) ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adoption of the ordinance and service plan 2. Disapprove the ordinance and service plan 3. Table the ordinance and service plan RECOMMENDA'T'ION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance 2. Service plan 3. Map Sharron Jar. n Planning Intern 0782a 5 N0. AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND C014-143000S AND ADJACENT TD THE CITY OF D£NTONe TEXAS) BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 31.335 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY of DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS A14D SEINZ> PART OF THE V. E, GAILOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 452, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS) CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the request for annexation was introduced at a regular meeting of trio City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the petition of the City of Denton, TeXa$i and i WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a puoiic nearing he.d for that purpose on the day of J 1984 in t..o Council Chambers for all interested persons to state tneir viers and present evidence Dearing upon the annexation provided by t.-:x ordinance) and WHEREAS, an opportunity was afforded, at a public hearing ne.d for that purpose on the .3 day or 1984 in t:e Council Chambers for all interested persons to state their views and present evidence Dearing upon the annexation provided by t.-.;s ordinance) and WHEREAS, this ordinance has been published in full at lelst one time in the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, prior to its effective date, and after the public hearings, NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN-ON, TEa.:S, HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That the hereinafter described tract of land be, and the sa,ae is nereDy annexed to the City of Denton, Texas, and the same is made hereby a part of said City and the land anu the present and future inhabitants tnereot anall De entitled to all tae :igncs and privileges of otner citizens of said City and snal1 oe bound the acts and ordinances of said City now in effect or which -.ay nereafter De enacted and the property situatec .herein shall De suc)ect to and shall bear its prorata part of the taxes levied .c the City, The tract of land hereby annexed %s descrined as A-5/PAGE ONE 119 40 , a follows, to-snit; All that certain tract or parcel of land that is situated in the v. E. Gail or Survey, Aost[act No. 452, Denton County, Texas oeing a portion of A certain (Called) 45.25 acre tract seeded by jt 8. Hassler to Burton W, Blacrs+ell on the • 17th day of June, 198; and recorded in Volume 1084, Page 194, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and being more fully descrsoed as follows; COMMENCING at the nortnwest corner of said 45.25 acre tract in the east rignt-of-way of F.M. Aoaa 2164; :HENCE north 99012'16' east a distance of 440.00 feet to the point of,5eginning; ,HENCE north 89°12'16' east a distance of 996.26 feet to a fence corner post; THENCE south 00004100' east a distance of 1377.30 feet r~ an iron pin; THENCE south 69°11'53' west a distance of 983,90 feet to a point; THENCE nortn 00039'50' west a distance of 1377,30 feet to the pcint f oeginning ana containing 31.335 acres of land, SECTIO111 I. fhe aoove described property is hereby classified as Agricul- rural 'A' District ano snail so appear on the official zoning z.ar of the city of Denton, Texas, anicn map Is nereby amenoed accordingly. SECTION :II, This orainance shall De effective immediately upon its passage. :ntroduceo before the City Council on the A4~"bay of _ 1984 PASSED AND APPROVED oy the City Council on tnr day cf 1984, n:C::ARD STEKAAT, MAYOR i C:TY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CSARLQT':E AL t, C:-Y SECRETARY C:TY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TC :EGAL FORM: C. :AYiAR, .:R., CITY .t:.ORPtEY C:TY OF ME TCN, TEXAS dy:C. 14 A-5/?AGE T'nU PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF I)ENTON, TEXAS WHEREAs, Article 070a as amended requires that a plans of service be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance annexing an area; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVE?? BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed annexation area the following plan of service: T, Basic Service Plan A, Police (1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other routine police services, swing present personnel and equipment, will be provided on the effective date of annexation ; (2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings, and other traffic control devices will be installed as the need therefore is established by appropriate study and traffic standards, B. Eire (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip- ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided on the effect ive date of annexation . C, Water (1) Water for domestic , commercial and industrial use will be provided at city rates, frorn existing city lines on the effective date of annexation, and thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, D. Seiner ( 1) Propert ies in the annexed areas wil l be connel- ted to sewer lines in accordance %vith article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas, E. Refuse Collection (1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro- vided within the city will be extended to the annexed area within one month after the effective date of annexation. Service Plan Annexed Areas Page two F. Streets (1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.) will begin on the effective date of annexation. (2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the present city, will begin in the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. (3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa- tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements, as the need therefore is determined by the governing body, will be accomplished under the established policies of the city. G. Inspection Services (1) Any inspection services now provided by the city (building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing, sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area on the effective date of annexation. H. Planning and Zoning (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city will extend to the annexed area on the effective date of annexation. City planning will thereafter encompass the annexed area. I. Street Lighting (1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan- tially developed areas in accordance with the established policies of the city. J. Recreation (1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec- tive date of annexation. The same standards and policies now used in the present city will be fol- lowed in expanding the recreational program and facilities in the enlarged city. K. Electric Distribution (1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for electric power. 5erviae plan" Annexed Areas page three L, MiscelIaneous (1) Street name signs where needed will be installed within approximately a months after the effective date of annexation. II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP) prioritized plan that is guide- The dated CIP of The City Plan consists lines as; (1) baseddpafor rtlyeonidensitycofppopulationt,emagnitude of problems compared to other areas, established technical standards n aturalortechnical a restraints professional aopportunities, (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city, (3) Impact on overall city economics, The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the area will be annexation a as allg other accordingly gof the t city. 1S , , p x} ' \ rata. a 1 r ~ :::4` 9ht~ t~ 1 V.L'~ .l t. ll~ ~.~f lit'j,.4 t , , t arty 11 r it .;K`t r q[1, 7j, 41 ,a• 1 ' ~ 1~ 1 t ~ ~ r~ •i. , ~ i f, r • « t f y hp ! y 1 trl f4 aril Ir ' t. ' 1 I i~ U ~iy! 1~ M 4• r ,f r '1 ~ n J'1.,,.~R b, 1 ~ i r. ur , , la, r' f 1 1\r ~ h'~'*!'•r*' , r~'~fi t' r. ~ 1~~~~ .~f {lrr 1(, I / rIA 'i 145,rtn .,.b \ ,f. /yie„ ~,ai• t~ t ba131J-f~i Y~r \11 a r ~ Id W.1 ! v r.. °~0.~,2 +y, tit. t r~ { ffy:l:4 t, f1 rni~ \ '1 ',J t r \Y'I~F'!1ltTfl \~~1~Ar'+YJ l~ ..r1 r w C 1y,4rn ,w1r.,l~Y ~4~'T 1.,~ IF fir'. . ~ , t a f', ° lp.l, k r~ r 1 i'aJ ~ h 7 1 . w } ~ 1 N . n' v e t Y{ , 7, a { r \ ti,l. ~ ` • IJ,,a r It t y <11?" Y 9~~~1c,fr-'•7 ,a .1.~rt t a.r , r. ,~+t ' i, i .jAY~`iy tv,~~rs ,c„ a ' .1 r t ,f1 `~a t to . I 1 ~ 1 ..e ~ 1 r a ' rr ; ~ i is ► \ 01 I R. Tt C lit I !~L ! I I ~ 1' A I fe I ar••/ F~~ 1sn.~ ~ 1 , ' ~ a.. 1 Jllr ~ q. ~ r ` ~ I a , „I..rrr r.f I Y 1 , cL r It p. T dTtl 'l,W / t HRW HFAR- pl Q CITY00ENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TE'LE'PHONE (817) 566.8200 M E M 0 TO: Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM; Chief Gentry, Fire Department RE: Ordinance of Fire Code Update DATE: August 24, 1984 After two years of study to update our fire code, and working with the City Attorneys office, we have chosen to present the Uniform Fire Code, 1982 edition, This code will update the code that we are currently using, the Uniform Fire Code, 1976 edition, The 1982 code will help In making our community a little safer to live In. Attached to this memo is an ordinance that is enacting a new Article I of Chapter 10 to provide the adoption of the Uniform Fire Code, 1982 edition and amendments; To provide for Fire Safety Inspections of buildings and permit fees for such Inspections and special inspections, ack Gentry, Fire u~ L i ef 1 NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI ENACTING A NEW ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1982 EDITION AND AMENDMENTS THERETOI TO PROVIDE FOR FIRE SAFETY INSPECTIONS OF BUILDINOB, FIRE EXTINGUISHING, SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE SYSTEMS, AND FLAMMABLE STORAGE FACILITIESr PROVIDING FOR INSPECTION AND PERMIT FEES PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF1 REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITHP AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION 1. That Sections 10-1 through 10-9 of Article I of Chapter 10 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton are hereby repealed, SECTION II. That a new Article I of Chaptat 10 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton Is hereby anacted to read as follows; ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Section 10-1. Uniform Fire Code Adopted There is hereby adopted by the City of Denton, Texas for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire and explosion, that certain Code and Standards known as the Uniform Fire code, including all appendicles thereof, and the Uniform Fire Code Standards published by the Western Fire Chiefs Association and the International Conference of Building Officials, being particularly the 1982 editions thereof and the whole thereof, save and except such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified or amended by Section 10-2, of which Code and Standards are on file with the City Secretary and the same are hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein, Section 10-2, Same-Amendments The Uniform Fire Code, 1982 edition, is hereby amended as follows; PAGE 1 1 (1) That Section 78-102(x) is hereby amended to read as fo:low81 (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess, store, to offer for sale, expose for sale, sell at retail, use or exploae, or manufacture any fireworks within the city limits or within 5000E feet thereof, except in cases where a permit fo: a supervised public display of fireworks s hereafter permitted, section 10-31 Arson Reward The City will pay a reward of two hundred and fifty zollars ($250.00) cash to any person turnishing and providing tzr City wItn information leading to the arrest and conviction of any person for the offense of arson within the corporate limits of the city. Section 10-4. Fire Safety Inspections Permits and Fees (a) Fire Safety Inspection Fees, The lessee, occupant :r user of a building or portion thereof, which is not a one-family dwelling, two-family dwelling or an Individual living un.. of a multi-family dwelllny, shall upon Inspection of such bui:,ing or portion thereof by authorized employees of the Fire Department be charged and pay, within thirty days of such inspection, a fire safety Inspection fee based upon the amount of interioc square footage of the building leased, occupied or used by such pereonl The fee shall be charged no more than once per year fzr each building inspected, regardless of the number of inspec* ions or rainspections, and shall be in an amount determined ane set, and as from time to time amended, i)y ordinance of the City Cc.;ncil, a copy of which shall be on file with the City Secretary, lcspecticn fees for common areas of such buildings shall be charye,: to and paid by the owner in accordance with the square footage inspected as provided for herein. (b) Permits for Fire Safety systems, storage Tanks -equiredj Fees Imposed. It shall be unlawful for any person to install, construct or reconstruct any au~omat.ic fire extinguishing system, fire protection sprinkler system, fire detection or alarm system, gasoline or LPG tank or storage facility, or standpipe system PAGE 2 without first obtaining a permit from the fire department, Upon application for the permit the person so applying shall pay a permit fee in an amount determined, and as from time to time amended, by ordinance of the City Council, a copy of which shall Y oe kept on file with the City Secretary, The foregoing permit requirements shall not apply to the Installation of smoke detectors in dwelling units which are governed by the provisions of Sutehapter F of Chapter 92 of the Texas Property Code (Vernon 1981), or any amendment theraof hereafter made, (c) Permits Required by the UFCI r9es imposed. Any permit required by Article 4 of the Uniform Fire codes 1982 edition, shall be issued only upon payment of a permit fee to the fire department it an amount determined, and as from time to time amended, by ordinance of the City Council, a copy of which shall be kept on file with the City Secretary, Section 10-5 10-17 Reserved, SECTION 111, That any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding Two Nundrea Dollars ($200,U0)) and each day and every day that the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in addition to and cumulative of, any other remedies as may be available at law and equity, SECTION 1V, That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and she City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. PAGE 3 SECTION V, All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinance become effective which are Inconsistent or in conflict with the terms.or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict, SECTd4)N VI, That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date Ot its passage, and the City secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten 110) days of the date of its passage, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984, RICHARD 0, STENART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTI CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM1 JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SYt PAGE 4 N0. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SETTING INSPECTION AND PEAXIT FEES AS PROVIDED FOR $Y ARTICLE It CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI REPEALING ALL ORDI- NANCES 114 CVNFLICT HEREWITH) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, " THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. That the fire safety Inspection fees and permit fees provicad for in Section 10-4 of Article I of Chapter 10 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas are hereby set in the following amountsi 1, Building Fire Safety inspection fees provided for in section 10-4(a)i Interior Square Footage Fee 0 to 6,000 $ 15.00 over 61000 to 12,000 30.00 over 12,000 to 24,000 60.00 over 24,000 100.00 2. Permit Fees for Fire Safety Systems and Storage Tanks provided for in Section 10-4(o)0 (a) automatic fire extinguishing systems $ 50.00 (b) fire protection sprinkler systems 50.00 (e) fire detection and alarm systems 50,00 (d) gasoline or LPG tanks 50.00 (e) stancpipe systems 50.00 3. Permit Fees provided for in Section 10-4(c), Faes for all permits required for all ousinessez or activities required under Section 4.101, of the UFC, (being the enumerated activities and businesses 1 through 46 therein), shall be $25.00 per permit except a$ Otherwise specified herein as follows; (a) The permit fee for 42, Repair hangers"r "12. Dry cleaning plants"j 013, Dust producing operations"; "21, Garages" "24, High-piled combustible stock,. "38, Places of assembling") 044, Tire recapping" and "45, Waste material handling plants" snail pay a permit fee based on square footage as pro- vided for in building fire safety inspection fees set out in 11 above, (b) The permit fee for 46. Burning in public place" or "4. Bonfires or rubbish fires' snail oe $50.00 per day. (c) The permit tee for 418, Flammable or combustible liquids or tanks, and 426. Liquified petroleum gases" shall be $50.00. PAGE i SECTION II, All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or In conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict, SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 119,444, RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; f CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DElTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK; JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE 2 r September 4, 1984 CI'T'Y COUNCIL AGHNI)A ITEM 50BjHCT: Consider Abandonment of Basoinont - Greater Denton Arts Council, et al Tract. SUMMARY: Cl:vis Morrison, representing the owners of this tract, is requesting the existing "blanket" easement be abandoned and a new easement d3scribing the exact boundaries to be dedicated. The existing easement was assigned to the City of Denton from Brazos Electric and is being used for the Texas Municipal Power Agency transmission power line which runs north and south, parallel to the west right-of-way line of Loop 288, FISCAL SUMMARY Not applicable. ACTION REQUIRED: City Council approval or disapproval of abandonment of existing "blanket" easement on the condition a new easement, descrioing the exact boundaries of the easement is executed, RECOMMENDATION: `rhe Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of August 15, 1984, recommended to the City t;ounciI that subject request be approved so long as new easement is executed by all parties showing exact locati-gin of line, Respectfully, 6e~ R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT 1 Ordinance for Abandonment of Utility liasement II Quit Claim Deed III Now Easement 1V Minutes PUB Meeting of 8/15/84 3091U:8 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO tRECUTE A 4LITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIOHT, TITLE AND 114TEREST OF THE CITY IN SAID EA10 0 T TO THE OWNER OF THE PkACT OF LAND CONVEYS. BY SAL) EASEMENTI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, acting p..rsuant to law, and upon the request and petition of the grantee neretn, deems Lt adviaaola to abandon and convey the neretnatter :escribed tract of land to grantee and is of the opinion that sa;a '.ttility easement is not needed for public use, and that same ssouId oe auanoone.t and quitclaimed to Texaa woman's University ;:..ncation, Selwyn St,nool, Inc., Eugena Porter Rayzor, Denton Cnar,nel Two Founoation, Inc„ and Greater Denton Arts Council, as :,e;eInafter pruvided, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton .s of the • opinion that the best Interest and weltare of the puuli: ;ill oa served oy abandoning and conveying the same to Texas Woman 'a Jniversity Foundation, Selwyn school, :no, Eugena Porte; Rayzor, Denton Channel Two Foundation, Iric., and Greater Oe - , n Acts Council, for the consideration neretnafter ,more fully set forth, :low, THEREFORE, ; BE IT ORUAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEN-,,. SECTION I. That the following described tract of land in the Ci: of Denton be and the same is hereby abandoned, vacated and closed. ,sofar as the right, title and easement of the public are concerned: Easement granted by W, T. Toone and Wife LiZZle Toone, rec. in Volume 354, page 400 Deed Records of Denton County - Filed November 21, 1949 - M.E.P. 5 P.R.R. C:. Survey section 45. - 69,65 AC. SECTION It. That the Major and City Secretary are hereby au:,-.:rued to execute and deliver that certain quitclaim deed attached .'ereto and . incorporated herein conveying said utLitty easement described PAGE L 1 1 therein to Texas Woman's Untversity Foundation, Selwyn Scn:,:., Im:,, Eugena Porter Rayzor, Denton Channel Two Foundation, and Greater Denton E,rts Council, SECTION III. That portion of the public utility easement nerein ;Iescrioeo being vacated, abandoned, and closed is made subject to a:. existing zoning regulations and deed restrictions, it any, and suu;i•:c to all existing easement rijnts of others, it any, vhetner apLarent :r not, SECTION IV. This ordinance shall take effect and be to full forcQ i:rz etfect from and after the date of its passage, and It i-e so ordain•rt• PASSED AND APPROVED oy the City Council of the City Denton, Texas, tn!. the day of 1984, RICHARD Q, STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEY, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: 404 D. MORRIS, AC MIG CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: L -Y" r' PAGE 2 ' IA A STATE OF TELAS, SNOW ALL MEN BY TH3= PMSEN'1'Bt COT71V'PY or DVT'ON i That The City of Denton, a Munioipal Corporation ~I of the County of Denton sad State of Texan for and in eonddersdon of I the stun of ` TZN AND N01100 010,00- I - bOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to it it hand paid by texas Woman's University Foundation, Selwyn School, Inv.. Lugaa ! Porter Raynor Denton Channel Two Foundation, Ina, 6 Greater Denton Arts Council of the county of Denton and state Of Texas the reccipt at which i b hereby acknowledged, do, by these prawnts, BARGAIN, SELL, RELEASE, AND FORTE QUIT CLAM unto the said Texas woman's University Foundation, Salwn School, Inc., t! Lugena Porter RAyror, Denton Channel Two Foundation, Inc. 4 Greater Denton Arts Council, thhelr su censors >Dn7U an~assignt, all its right title and Interest in and to that certain tract or W. eel of land lying in the County of Denton and State of Texas, described u follows, 41 trl'~ti t'. Casement granted by W. T. Toone and wife Lizzie Toone., rec. in volume 35~. ?age 00 Dead Records oL Denton County - Filed November :1, 190 - M.E,P. S P,R.R. Survev Section 45, - 69,65 AC, i v. r" I TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, together with all and singuiar the rights, priri. leges and appurtenances thereto in any manner belonging unto the said Texas 'onan's Cni-.crsity Foundation, Selwryn School, Inc., Eugena Porter Raynor, Denton Channel rwc Foundation, Inc and Greater Dentert Art Council their successors and assigns, ~orever, so that neither the said City of Denton, a Municipal Corporation, its successors and assigns nor xhitlMxAdtetany person or persona claiming under i t shall, at any titre hereafter, have, claim or demand any right or titie to the aforesaid Premisos or app utenances, or asn part there- ' of, , 'E 11,17T34= my hand at Denton, Texas this day of A. D. 19 ; . Witnesses at Request of Grantor: ~ CI21 OF._OE, TEXAS ?i ATTEST: BY R! RICilakU 0. MWART, KAYOR r ryl y 1 ' 9<.rUt.B ACI►.YOR'Gt:pU,y£VT TRx' STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY of BCFOItC SIC, the underula.N authontY, ,n and foe said County, Texas, on this day alasonally tppeued ':n^. vm :o To ae ::,s prior h tie -.urns ;uJsvrSvd to this f noving natrl,nent.-t4 rknouie:: _.a :-,it ae axerated this same Wr :he purpalas and as nsideronon Therein expreteed. OIYEN t; NDER MY HAND kND SEAL OF OFFICE, rho day L.3.1 NntalY Public u:y. ;teas his' CammlSaian E.xpli4s 1,m4 t, 0 SINGLE ,1CHNOR'LEDGME`IT THE STATE OF TEXAS, '.:OCSTS' OF I BEFORE ME• the undorn r-'N authonty, .n and foe 1414 CwuntY. Texas, do this day per tonally appeared knou-n to me is be the person xmole name 1u DsdnEN to the foret;awr instrument, and aekno,vl e:;ca :e me that he rterated :ee same fur :he puroofes and :ansraer2 ,on :herein e.xpressod. IWEN UNDER 111' HAND AND $CAL IF JFFICE. rhos 1sy tf t9 ymatY PuEilc. rox3s ,My':ummuston Expires June t. 1) CORPORATION ACIL.\OWLEDGIIEYT THE STATE OF TEX-AS, 'i COUNTY OF Jrr.,,,T,',O,I v.,._. ..,I BEFORE MEN the unders:e~ed authorial, A and for said Conroy, rexal. sn this day personally appe►rsd...:~11a1d 0. SC,~,'{dC4.,..,`lriycf :.^.2 ESL!. ^rln LJn, ".a:C13 _kno4 'A rte to t!4 ,e and ~irHetr ,whose name a ra Csuraed to :ae !anrrmn; .nsp'lment and a<kno4lWged :o me that the lame 4v t.te act of :ne said -.ha :.7...J.i.,.DOman ~ z.eLl1' r_:1ual_4a1._._.._...-_.°_- s konoennon. Ind that :.a oxeeated :he lame Ia tae art it fuch corporstion for the purposes anA conm.:,rsnon therun expressed. and ,n :he ocaaaty :heee,n sated. OWEN UNDER MY }LAND AND SEAL OF OFMC£. Thm___Uy A.J. 19.3.1, WWI Puollc, __17E:I 'cunq•. Ta.xm 1Pr Cammisslon Exmres Lures t, t)._ CLERK'S CERTIFICATE THE ST.ITE OF TEXAS, L .ountr :oL'~TY nF i ':Urk if •he ^ourlty Court of said Count Y, ro atreny oerttty test the for-gmnlr mstrarnent of vnt:nt :area n the day If A. D. 1) w,th :a ':ertntaate :f A'nhen:lca: '-,s i',td fir record to mY' nNet nn the der of ..t. D.:7 , at t claa< ~I . and dm"i wordnJ this dal oC A. D.:) at o'Nxx 91„ in :he Records of said County, in Volume. on :.apes NITN'ES3 MY HAND AND SEAL IF THE':OV%TY COCBT f sa,4 'aanty, at race n the day Ind yrar .ast ehora +nnen. County Clerk... lL 3J By Deputy, cut 3 z '3 I=z. I o I,? y, . . 3 .1 OD . to i _ L-W a J; Ui Q1 f-i ' HI i} ~ q u Y . ,I i , ! 9 ~ ~ at .9 3 ~ n EASEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS 5 COUNTY OF DENTON S KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That, Texas Woman's University Foundation, Selwyn School, Inc, Eugena Porter Rayxpr, Denton Channel Two Foundation, Inc, and Greater Denton Arts Council, of the County of Denton, Texas, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar 141.00) cash to us tin hand paid by the city of Denton, Texas, the receipt of which is nereoy acknowledges, and other good and valuaole consideration including the oenefits tnat will accrue to our property, do hereoy give, grant and extend to the said City of Denton, Texas, its successora and assigns, the right to construct and roc,)nstruct an ail purpose utility easement and perpetually maintain Said easement in, cn and Across land described as follows: All that certain 2,233 acre tract or parcel of land Situated in the M.E.P. P.R.R. Co, Survey, Abstract No, 927, Denton County, Texas, Salo tract being part of a tract anown by deed to Greater oentan Art Council Ana recorded in Volume 1184, Page 583 and part ar tract snown by aeed to Denton Channel ^wo Foundation, Inc and reroraeo in Volume 1173, Page 834 of the Deed Records, Denton County, texas, and being more particularly described as follows; Beginning for the nortneast corner of the tract being -escrioed herein at a point South d9056'04' west, 219,61 feet fro:ro t1,e northeast corner of said Greater DQ,Iton Art Council .tract; THENCE south 00°00'26' east and passing at 689,13 feet, : soutn line of said Greater Denton Art Council tract and the north :%ne of the Said Denton Channel Two Foundation, Inc, tract and :ontinuing for a total distance of 1389,51 feet to a point eein. north 89051'52' west 209,18 feet from the southeast corner of sai:. Denton Channel Pwo Foundation, Inc. tract; THENCE north 89051152' west with the south line of sai,i Benton Channel Two Foundation, Inc, tract 70,00 feet to a point for :orner: THENCE north 00100'26' west and passing at 699,77 feet t.:e nortn line of said Denton,Channel Two Foundation, Inc, tract and the south line of the said Greater Denton Art Council tract and continuing for a total distance of 1389,27 feet to a point on the north line of said Greater Denton Art Council tract: THENCE north 84056'04' east wltn tho north line of said ;,neater Denton Art Council tract 70,00 feet to the point of beginning. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, all singular, the privileges aforesaid to it, the said City of Denton, Texas, its successoca and assigns forever, together with the right and privilege, at any and all times . to enter said premises or any part thereof, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing and perpetually maintaining said all EASEMENT/PAGE 1 1 Purpose utility easement togetneC wI to necessary appurtenances inside said perpetual utility easement) all upon the conditia,:. :nat the City of Denton, Texas, •4111 at all timea, after doing an;. .orK in connection with the construction, reoonstruction or rer.1 of said puolio utilities restore said premises as nearly as iijazi 4;L.4 to the condition in which same were found oefore such w Q i c 4as undertaken, including repair of all fences that might oe disL-coo or damaged in pertorming said work, and that said tract will nz~t oe used ay said City of Denton, Texas, 'or any other purpose, nder tnia grant, except as herein provided. WITNESS out nand, :his the iay or _ 1914 TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY SELWYN SCHOOL, INC. FOUNDATION ay: SY: (TITLa") (iiTLE) • DEMON CHANNEL TWO FOUNDATION GREATER DENTON ARTS COUIl,:-: BYI dY: (TITLE) (TITLE) EJGENA PORTER ROVIOR THE STATE OF TEXAS S COUNTY OF DENTON S This instrument was acknowledgeo before me on the of , 1984, , of Taxaa :.an'a University Foundation, on oehal of sail foundation, NOTARY PUBLIC DENTON COUNTY, 'TEXAS THE STA':E OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON S :his instrument was acknowledged oefore me on the day of , 1984, , of Salwyn 5.^ool, Inc., on behalf of said school. NOTARY PUBLIC D£NTON COUNTY, TEXAS EASEMENT/PAGE 2 1 ' THE STATE OF TEXAS S COUNTY OF DENTON S This Instrument was aeknowledgeu before me on the day of , 1984, of Denton Channel Two oundatlon, Inc., on behalf of 44-0-TQ-undatton, NOTARY PUBLIC DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS $ COUNTY OF DENTON $ This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 19841 of Greater Centon Arts Council, on behalf of Sala coundil. ;7OTARY PUBLIC DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS i COUNTY OF DENTON S Thls lnstfument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 19841 by Eugena Porter Raynor, NOTARY PUBLIC DEN'TON COUNTY, TEXAS BASEMENT/PAGE 3 MINU'CE.S PUBLIC UTILITIES WARD MEE'rIW August 15, 1984 700 P.M, Civil Defense Roan The meeting was brought to order at 7130 P,M „ with Leonard Herring pi:e:P idi ng , Memt>-rs Presenti Chairman Roland Laney, Johro Thomson, Nancy Boyd. Leonard Herring, Edward Coomes Chris Hartung, R. E, Nelson Staffs F. B. Tullos, Ovid Ham, Charles Cryan, John McGrane, Joseph Marino 1. OONSIDER MINIlT'ES OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD/CITI' COUNCIL JOINT ME'ErINC OF JULY 24 , 1484. Edward Coomes made a motion to accept the Minutes as written, second by Thompson, 4 ayes, no naves, motion carried. 2. "SIDER AHANDONMENT OP FXSOYT.NT GREATER DDMN ARTS COUNCIL, ET AL. Ernie Tullos presented this item; that the existing blanket easement be abandoned and a new easement describjnq the exact boundries be executed, (At this point Roland Laney arrived and took the chair, 7x45 P.M.) After a brief discussion, Boyd node a motion to recomriend abandonment and Thompson seconded, 5 ayes, no naves, motion carried. 3. CONSIDER PROVIDING WATER~SEWER SERVICE M DFS1'ION COUN'T'Y NOPTH MOBILE SUBDIVISION A&DENTON COUNN SOUTH SUBDIVISION ON EAST MCKINNEY ST. AWACENT IO V CATION VILLAGE FSTATELS~ David Ham presented this item to •U-he Board remrrmending that we let them tie on to the Vacation Village Water company and upgrade the lift station to the Denton Sewer System,, developer to pay the cost. Coomes stated he is concerned about annexing the area in the future, resulting in difficulty upgrading the system to City standards. Hair stated the water system will be put into our specifications. Thcrrpson wants to know the legal problems involved upon future annexation. Laney questions how we will bill for sewer without water flow. The response was that it would be put on the Vacation Villa()e System and billed per customer. Thompson wants an attorney to look at a formal policy, regarding such things as who pays for the system when annexation occurs. CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOt The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMI Hill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works DATE: August 30, 1984 SUBJECTi RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR THE DENTON' MUNICIPAL AIRPORT I have included for your consideration copies of a resolution and supporting documentR establishing the Minority Business Enterprise Program for the Denton Municipal Airport, The establishment of this program is a federal requirement which is tied to our federally funded airport improvement project, This program was written by our airport manager and follows the guidelines required by the FAA, The FAA has reviewed this document and has approved its form and content, The Airport Advisory Board will review this resolution on Friday, August 30, 1984, and develop its recommendation, The Board's recommen- dation will be presented to the Council at the September 4, 1984, meeting, Should you have any comments or questions, please let us know, J ill Angelo BA/sc ai Attachmentst Resolution MBF Program anal. R E s 0 L U T 1 0 N WHEREAS, the Airport Manager of the City of Denton Municipal Airport has developed and prepared a Minority Business Enter- prise Program for submittal to the United States Department cf Transportaton in satisfaction of the Department's Regulations t,~r the receipt of federal assistance for the airport as set fortn in the Code of Federal Regulations, 49 CFR Part 23) and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, desires to ensure that mim.rity business enterprises as uet::;ea in 49 CPR Part 23 have the °jaximum opportunity to partlcipate in the performance of contracts ur suucontracts rebating to airc.rt improvements financed in whole or in part with federai icnas provided under such minority business enterprise agreement) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE Cl.: OF UENTON, TEXASI SECTION I. That the Denton Municipal Airport's Minority Business :a u- prise Plan, including a policy statement and agreement, const;t:ng of eight pages, attached hereto as Exnibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, be and the same is hereby adopted a::d approved, SECTION 11, That the City Manager of the City of Denton, Texas, oc :,rs destynee, shall administer the Minority Bus Ihess Ell ter;:ise Program in compliance with its terms and conditions ana those set forth in the United States Department of Transportatn's Regulations pertaining thereto, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of RICHARD 0. ST7.WART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF_D/ENTON, TEXAS BY: 1 L~ ~T tA~ D EXHISIr .'A" Page 1 : i 3 CWYoI01WNnW, rtXA8 MUNICrPAL AIRPOAr ROUTE I, AIRPORT ROAD 0VNTON, TEx4.: 16201 DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PLAN POLICY STATEMENT IT IS THE POLICY of the Denton Municipal Airport to encourage the participation :f Minority Business Enterprises (MBEs) to the maximum extenr feasible in all phat.ia of its procurement practices, This is done by providing an equal opportunity f., MBEs to compete for contracts in the areas of construction, services, equipment and supplies, and, generally for any other procurement requirements the Airport may t.a e, The City of Denton recognizes that minorities (including women) have been under-epresen- ted as owners and managers of businesses in this counrry and as contractors pa r.:,ipating in federally assisted programs, The City of Denton has in the past and will,: Trt inue, both as a matter of principle and law, to ensure that no person is discriminate'i against on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex. This policy provides tst minority business enterprises receive a fair percentage and fair dollar volume :f the contractual business done by the Airport, This policy extends to encouraging use of minority owned businesses and banks by contractors doing business with the l sport. 1'or the purposes of this policy, a "minority" is defined as a person who is a :--tiren or lawful permanent resident of the United States and who isi (a) Black (A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of t rica)l (b) Hispanic (a person of Spanish or Portuguese culture with origins in X,cxi<o, South or Central America, or the Caribbean Islands, regardless of rac:); (c) Asian American (a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pact+'ir Islands); or (d) American Indian and Alaskan Native (a person having origins in any o: the original peoples of North America); and (e) Members of other groups, or other individuals, found to be economiaal:z• and socially disadvantaged by the Small Business Administration under Se.:;ion 8(a) of the Small Business Act, as amended (15 u,s,c, 637 (a)), "Minority Business Enterprise" means a snail business concern, as defined puri,,Ir t to Section 3 of the Small Business Act and implementing regulations, which is owns,; and controlled by one or more minorities or women. This definition applies only c; financial assistance programs, For the purpose of this ;)olicy, owned and controlled business means a businessi (a) t,'hich is at least 5l percent owned by one or more minorities or womec er, in the case of a publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the st:,ck of which is owned by one or more minorities or women; and (b) khose management and daily business operations are controlled by one :T more such individuals. TELEPHONE 817,"566-8419 - 0 PW METRO 434-2520 Page 2 of a To the extent legally practicable, the Denton Municipal Airport will ensure that all contractors providing servioes, materials or eapplios to the Airport, provide eaployment opportunities to minorities and fossils equal to those provided to all other groups or individuals. Contractors will also be required to take positive steps toward the utilisation of minority businois enterprises to the maximum extent feasible Upon request, the Airport will provide MBEs with Information on the preparation of bid specifications, fulfillment of general bid requirements, job performance requirements, and procurement opportunities, The Airport encourages joint ventures among Mggs and between majority and minority firms bidding for Airport contracts, The Airport will use its best efforts to ensure that Me are informed of current and future procurement activities through utilization of newspapers, local minority chambers of commerce, and other minority assistance organizations, as well as through direct contact with minority entrepreneurs. Signature Name Title Date Signature Name Title Date Page 3 of A DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MINORITY BUSINESS ENTEkPRISE PRf)GRAM The Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) pro ram to follow is being submitted to the U,S, Department of Transportatlon (DOT) by the Denton Municipal Airport (Airport) In satisfaction of requirements set forth in the DOT MBE regulations (49 CPR Part 23), The Denton Municipal Airport understands and agrees to the following: "if as a condition of assistance the recipient has submitted and the department has approved a minority business enterprise affirmative action program which the recipient agrees to carry out, this program is incorporated into this financial assistance agreement by refer- ence, This program shall be treated as a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this financial assistance agreement, Upon notifi- cation to the recipient of its failure to carry out t;,,e aproved program the Department shall lmpose such sanctions as noted In 49 CPR Part 34, Subpart E, which sanctions may in- clude termination of the agreement or other measures that may affect the ability of the recipient to obtain future DOT financial assistance," The Denton Municipal Airport further agrees to adopt the following program elements and reporting procedures: 1. MBE PROGRAM ELEMENTS 49 CPR Part 23 sets forth certain required MBE program elements in S23.43 (e)-(I), to be applicable to activities carried out by the Denton Airport. The Airport agrees to Include the following clauses in each procurement initiated directly by the Airport, and to adopt the following program elements: A. Required MBE contract clauses: 1. Policy. It is the policy of the Department of Transportation that minority business enter- prises as defined in 49 CPR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate In the performance ol! contracts financed in whole ar in part with Pedcral funds under this agreement. Consequently the MBE requirements of 49 CPR Part 23 apply to this agreement. Page A of 8 MBE Programs Page 2 2. AIDE Obligation. 'the recipient or Its contractor agrees to ensure that minority business enterprises as defined in 49 CPR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate In the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or In part with Federal funds provided under this al,reement. In this regard all recipients or contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in acordance with 49 CPR Part 23 to ensure that minority business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. Recipients and their contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of DOT-assisted Contracts, MBE Directory (S23,45(e)The Airpport will develop a loose-leaf directory of minority businessos to identify MBE's with capabilities relevant to con- struction of airport improvements. The information contained in the VIBE source list or directory shall be made available to (subreciptents), contractors, bidders, and proposers to facilitate their efforts to meet the specific bIBE program requirements where uniti exist, for private sector contracting or purchasing C. Procedures to ascertain the ollggibillty MBE's end joint ventures involving MBE's 1S23,45(f)); 1. The Airport will ensure that any benefits re- sulting from the goal-oriented MBE program accrue only to firms owned and controlled by minorities or women within the meaning of 49 CPR Part 23, $23.5. 2. The Airport agrees to certify MBE's in accord- dance with the requirements of 49 CPR part 23, Schedule(s) A and B upon receipt of notifica- tion that the Office 0f Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the format under the prov- visions of OMB Circular A-40, The Airport may accept certifications proviously accepted by other DOT operating elements. 3. The Airport will ensure that the certification systems are at leash as effective as procedures prescribed in 49 CPR Part 25, 523.51, Page B of 8 MPE Programs Page S 4. The Airport will when possible replace a VIBE subcontractor thjtt is unable to perform suc- cessfully with another MBE. The Ali-port (and its subreeipients) will approve all substitu- tions of M135 subcontractors before bid opening and during contract performance, to ensure the substitution of bona fide MBE's. D. Percentage goals for the dollar value of wort; to be awarded to MBE's ($21.45(g)). 1. For each grant or pproject, the Airport will review is various Programs so as to identify those proposed contracts having potential for MBE participation and set an overall goal for MBE participation within the generated activities to be carried out and goods to be purchased. The overall MBE goal shall include a separate goal for firms owned and controlled by minorities, and a goal for firms owned and controlled by women. The Airport overall goal for minority-owned firms for is lot and the goal for women-owned business Is 211. These per- centages are based upon the total dollar value of contracts with, and goods purchased from, the private sector. 2. Contract goals will be negotiated whore MBE subcontracting opportunities have been iden- tified. The goal(s) will be expressed as a percent of the total dollar amount of the con- tract. The Airport will meet or exceed the goals} or be prepared to demonstrate that best efforts were expended so as to accomplish the MBE obligation. S. The overall goal (and/or subsequent contract goals) will be based on a review of the avail- ability of MBE's located within at least the usual market area for contractors and vendor.. The overall goal will reflect the results that reasonably could be expected as a consequence of aggressive efforts to implement the MBE program, 4. The NIB Circular A-95-Clearinghouse review shall suffice as the goal-related 45-day comment period required by 514.45(g). Page ti o!' 8 MBB Programs Page 4 E, Procedures to require that participating MBE's are identified by name by competitors for contracts (W .45(h)1. The Airport will require prime contractors to submit the names of any MBE subcontractor(s), their re- spective scope of work, and the dollar value of the proposed MBE subcontract(s) within a reasonable time within the circumstances of each solicitation after bid opening(s) and prior to the actual contract award, F. Selection criteria to ensure that prime contracts are awarded to competitors that meet MBE goals (123,45(1)1. 1. The Airport contracting activities Incorporate procedures whereby bids will be reviewed to determine whether the lowest bidder meeting the MBE contract goal is within the zone of com- petition as to price for the contract. 2, if the Airport determines that this competitor has offered a reasonable price, the firm shall be awarded the contract, If the bidder's price Is not reasonable, the competitor with the next highest percentage of MBE participation shall be considered and so on, in order of their per- centage of MBE participation until one with a reasonable price is selected. In the event no bidder with MBE participation has ofered a reasonable price, then the Airport may elect to award the contract to any bidder or offeror that demonstrated a reasonable effort to meet the MRh contract goal. 3, The Airport will consider steps, including but not limited to the following, as to determining whether reasonable efforts were made to meet MBF contract goalst a. Attendance at a pre-bid meeting, if any scheduled by the recipient to inform ,MBE's of subcontracting opportunities under soli- citation; page 7 or 8 M$f Programs Page S b, Adravdeertlsement in general circulation media, t aasocletion publlcatlons, and minority. focus ppmedia for at least 20 days before bids ava~lableals are due, If 20 days are not reasonable ti time its tacceptabjeshorter c, Written notification to MBE's that their Interest In the contract Is solicited; d. Efforts made to select portions of the work proposed to be performed by MBE's in order to Increase the likelihood of achieving the stated goal; e. Efforts to negotiate with MBE's for specific bids for subcontracts including at a minumum; I. The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of MBE's that were contacted; 11, A description of the information prov- ided to MBEs regarding the plans and specifications for portions of the work to be performed; and Ill. A statement of why additional agree- ments with MBE's were not reached; f. Concerning each MBE the competitor contacted but rejected as unqualified, the reasons for the competitor's conclusion; and g• Effort made to assist the MBE's contacted that needed assistance in obtaining bonding or insurance requlred by the contractor or recipient, 4. Bidders, proposers, offerors, that fall to meet (MBE contract goals and/or) the foregoing reasonable efforts" test, will not be certified as eligible to be awarded the federally-assisted contract. S. The Airport will ensure that all obligations under MBE contracts are met, by reviewing the contractor's DIBE Involvement efforts during the life of the contract. (Any Interruption of scheduled progress payments to MBE's shall be brought to the attention of the City of Denton,) 1 , Page 8 of 8 MBE Programs Page 6 II. REPORTING PROCEDURES A. The Airport will maintain records on specific con- tract awards to MBE's, In a format and frequency (quarterly) to be prescribed by DOT, B. The minimum MBE data elements to be maintained are as follows: 1. The number of contracts awarded to MBE's; 2. A description of the contract(s) awarded to MBE'sl 3. The dollar value of MBE contract awards; 4. The percentage of the dollar value of all contracts awarded to the private sector that awarded to MBE's; and 5. An appraisal of the extent to which the MBE awards mat or exceeded the MBE goal. This program is offered In consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal fin- ancial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Denton Municipal Airport. by the Department of Trans- portation and Is binding on it, other recipients, subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in Interest and other participants. DATED; I APPLICANT Attachments; Department of Transportation Regulations 0170) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE: September 4, 1984 SUBJECT: Consider a resolution to readopt the Denton Development Guide with 1984 amendments SUMMARY: The Denton Development Guide provides for a yearly formal review and readoption. As re- quired, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the Guide and recommended a series of Guide clarifications. These clarifications were reviewed by the City Council in a work session in July, 1984, Attached are the tentative conclusions of that review which would be incor- porated in the Denton Development Guide if. approved. ACTION REQUIRED: Adoption of the resolution ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the resolution 2. Modify the resolution 3, Disapprove the resolution RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the 1984 Denton Development Guide. EXHIBITS: 1. Resolution 2. List of 1984 amendments 3. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes teve Fanning Comprehensive P1 rner 0781a •1 R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the City of Denton has and expects to continue to e113oy a pattern of growth and development throughout the 1980's and beyond) and WHEREAS, the community in response to such growth and development has instituted a process to auoress questions of land use planning, development and controls and WHEREAS, as a result of such process a document titled Denton Development Guiae (1981) was pruouced) and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Uenton, Texas believes that such document is a useful tool to be used to did in the day-to-day decisions concerning growth and development of the City and adopted the Guide for such use) and WHEREAS, the policies contained in the 1981 Guide are reviewed annually by the Planning and Loning Commission fur their recommendation to the City Counei:. as to amendments and modifications to be made to the 1981 Guides and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has completed its 1983-84 annual review of the 1981 Guide and hereby makes its recommendation that the 1981 Guide be amended, to provide fur incorporation of the attached PoTTicies and procedures! NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Denton Ueyelopment Guide (1981), is hereby amended, to provide for the -incorporation o the attached policies and procedures therein, and said Guide, as amended, is hereby adopted as the official land use and development goide for the City to be used in future planning, development and land usi+ decisions in the manner and for the purposes therein st;tite•7 until such time it is repealed or hereafter amended. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1964. RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS ATTESTt CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF UENTON, TEXAS h BY., DENTON DEVELOPMENT GUIDE (1981} AMENDMENTS 1983-84 Sept. 1994 DENTON DEVELOPMENT dUIDE AMENDMENTS 1983-84 The following are the 1983/84 issues that are to be incorporated with and made a part of the Denton Development Guide, i, POLICIES ON INTENSITY STANDARDS A. Basic Intensity Planning Policy The intensity index policies are the priority policies of the Guide, The importance is to be emphasized in all planning activities. The changing of an areas intensity index standard is considered a major decision of the city and therefore incremental planning activities and decisions, that will change the current or projected intensity of an area should be tabled, time permitting, and a special intensity study of that area should be referred to the Planning and zoning commission. Incremental planning activities and or decisions include but are not limited to, zoning, utility, drainage, transportation, park planning, etc., that can directly or indirectly change an areas ultimate land use intensity, The Planning and Zoning study will focus on the areas intensity question, addressing the need and impact of changing an reas intensity index standard, The study recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for final action. Special Note: It should also be understood there are numerous other policies and factors that will be considered in City planning decision making. B. Intensity Standards. Do They Reflect Our Community Objectives? The staff is hereby instructed to recommend a study procedure to address this question in more detail. For the interim our current intensity standards will be maintained. C. Are Current Efforts To Implement The intensity standard Adequate? The staff is hereby :nstructed to recommend a study procedure to address this question. The study amo, 'ig other things will include consideration of the follow- ing concepts: -1- Concept Yl on plin mentation For concentrate funding of infrastructure only in planned areas, Concept Y2 - Consideration of an intensity overlay zone. This concept requires each deve- lopment to meet the intensity zoning nas well as the District standards (also could e include othe guide policies). I n the interim i t i s the policy of th,~ c i t y hat.iall major zone caseu be a P.D. with a 3 year time for substantial development (15%) to be started, it the specitted time limits are not met the subject agenda required cons aeration P.D. aw and 11prlaced will be on processed of modifying trie zoning, II. SPECIFIC LAND USE AREA PERFORMANCE POLICIES. A. The Type of Project Called *ApartmLow ent wil,b2 Density e l Density etc. Medium Densityt classified as follows: Units/Acre Low Density 0 - 5 Medium Density 6 - 12 High Density 13 - and above B. Access Required For High Density Housing In low intensity areas: o high density requires the only access by secondary arterial or greater. street (not requires at least one o amedium ccess ben a y collector concentrations unit). In moderate intensity areas: o high density, at least one actress by made`isi or secondary arterial with no access by low ty residential street. by concentrations a collector street requires at least o (not every access density 0 one medium individual unit). C. Clarify The Intent Of The Policy "To Have strict Site Design ReView For All Projects Within One Block Of Existing single Family Dwel.linga" by adding the following wording, If within 1,500 feet of existing low density residen- tial or such addir.ional distance as judged to ne materially affecting the character of the neighborhood the following policies apply for commercial/apartment development; 1. If adjacent residential areas have landscaped front lard then the commercial/apartments would liKewise have landscaped front yards, 2, It adjacent to single story residential, then the commlarci.al/apartment would be single story or have large setbacks for transition to the neighbornood, 3. Signs will have to be in scale with the neighborhood, which usually means attached to the building race, 4. Parking lot design would need to consider access away from residences, parking areas setbacks, permanently screened from residence, and parking lot lights positioned away from residence. 5. Also, when practical, compatible architectural style would be encouraged. D. Clarification Of Concentration Policies , Clarification of the policy on apartment concentra- tion in low and moderate intensity neighborhoods, Change guide policy to specific standards as follows: o Concentration in low intensity areas be limited to 200 units. o Concentration in moderate intensity areas be limited to 750 units. o Concentration must be separated from other high density housing by 1/2 mile or 50% of intensity area length, which ever is less. This separation includes separation trom adjacent intensity area high density housing, including moderate intensity areas, adjacent to low intensity areas. -3- 2, clarification Of the policy on (page 24). What are "small scattered sites" (concentrations of neighbor- hood coinmercial office, etc.), Chango guide policy to specific standards as follows: o Concentration of office/retail etc, in low intensity areas be limited to 4 acres or 2,600 intensity units whichever is more, o Concentration must be separated from other high intensity retail, office or similar land uses by 1/2 mile or 50% of intensity area length, which- ever is less, This separation includes separation from adjacent high intensity land use areas, including moderate intensity areas, adjacent to low intensity areas. However, no separation is required in conjunction with an apartment concen- tration (i,e., apartments (200 units) and retail (4 acres )J equal one concentration area to be separated from another:. E. Policies For Mobile Nome Parks Add to the guide the following location policies for mobile home parks: Low Intensity Areas: 1, The overall intensity standard not to be violated 2. No concentration more than 200 units 3. Access by a collector street or larger (if (#ensity less Loan 12 units/ac) 4. Strict site plan control within 1,600 feet, of existing single family residential 5. Sufficient green space, recreation facilities, etc. provided 6. Input into planning by neighoorhood Moderate Intensity Areas: 1, The overfill intensity standard not to oe violated 2. Limit concentration to 750 units 3. Access to collector street or larger (if density less than 12 units/ac) 4. Strict site planning within 11600 feet of single family residential _4_ F, clarification of The policieG Concerning Protection of Existing Housing The City is to continue the ourent policy which is a veS4 str';t and narrow interpretation of the criteria on page s, including e plaiine~Tc development (pp) site plan requirements. in addition the toilowing wording will be added to the development guides Typical Review Criteria and Procedure; 1, impact on neighborhood intensity index, if the proposed development exceeds the intensity index standard then the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council will typically conduct a special study of the neighborhood to see if the intensity index standard can be raised and still maintain the neighborhood and city development integrity. This first study will be for overall neighborhood intensity study and not to consider the specifics of a proposed request. Also note raising a neigh- borhood intensity standard does not automatically signal approval of a specific request, 2. if the development meets the neighborhood intensity index standard (or as revised) then a detail site plan will be required for development within 11600 feet of the neiyhborhood (or such distance that is judged to materially affect the neighborhood), 3. Other general review criteria states: o Sucn things as upgrading or eliminating older ueteriorating structures will be considered a positive action but not to the extent,that it is judged detrimental to the overall neighborhood. o A major review criteria will be to compare the proposed use and location in toe subject neign- borhood to the same use in a similar location in a new neighborhood. if it would be allowed in or adjacent to the new neighborhood it is probably acceptable to the older neighborhood, if it would not be acceptable the newer neighbor- hood it will probably not be acceptable to the older neighborhood. -5- G. 2Reconfirm AndO Clait The Intent 4) DiversifiedrLandzUse Encouraged in Lowliintensity Areas The current policies should be strictly enforced and equally applied to all low intensity planning areas, Allow limited amounts in all neighborhoods, but pro- hibi concentration in any one neighoorhood, strictl enforcin the overall intensity standard and concen- trat on standard W%" Ad be required- H. Commercial/Office Development On Carroll Bouiev,rrd Reconfirmation of the current guide policies. III4 FIXED DESIGN POLICIES A. New Southern Alignment of Loop 288 And The Corre- sponding Medium Intensity Areas The alignment is to be changed to Hickory Creek (toad, and the two current medium intensity areas on Ryan Road are to be moved to Teasley and Hickory Creek Road and Ft. Worth Drive and Brush Creek Road. B. Bell Avenue Right-of Way And Functional Designation From McKinny street North Alternative alignments for Bell Avenue to Sherman Drive will be studied and Drought back to Planning and Zoning and City Council for final determination, C. Mingo Road Right-Ot-Way b0 feet of right-of-way as Mingo parallels the railroad. D. Redefining Thoroughfare Classification The expressway designation will be added for Loop 288 and Highway 380. E. Changes Yearly Guide Update Time From April To October F. Development Near The Pecan Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant No additional residential development will be zoned within 2,500 feet of the Wastewater Treatment Plant and that residential development will be generally discouraged between 21500 feet and 91000 feet from the Plant. The area within 21500 feet of the Wastewater Treatment Plant will be utilized for indu8trial purposes, preferal:ily industries that could utilize the effluent from tY,e Plant as cooling water or other: processes requiring lower quality water, -6- P & Z Minutes June 27, 1984 PASS 18 B. Approval of the final plat of the Audra Estates Addition Mr. Clark stated the property in this proposed sub- division is zoned single family (SF-7) and approximately 63 lots for detached single family land use is pro- posed, The site is located ad.iacent and east of Audra Lane, north of the Lee Meadow Addition, He stated the existing 15" sewer and 8" water mains will serve this site, lie stated Audra Lane is subject to perimeter street paving requirements. Adequate gas, electrical and telephone services are available for extension to this site. He stated the owners of the adjacent prop- erty have expressed concern about plans for handling drainage, He further stated Development Review Commit- tee does not recommend approval until the problems are worked out between property owners on the drainage. Mr. Juren made a motion to table the final plat of the Audra Estates Addition until the next Planning and Zon- ing Commission meeting of July 11, 1984, so that the drainage problems can be resolved. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0). C.FConsider final recommendation to the City Council for 1984 Development Guide update. Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approval of the 1984 Denton Development Guide update with the recommendation to reword the first issue to reflect the Planning and Zoning Commission's desire to review all intensity modifications. Seconded by Mr. Escue and L unanimously carried (6-0). D. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Denton Retirement Center Addition. Mr. Clark stated this 6.034 acre site was recently approved as a planned development (PD) for a seven story multi-family housing community for senior citizens and a sixty bed personal care unit. He stated the preliminary plat conforms with the approved PD site plan. One drive way is shown on Bonnie Brae Street and a landscaped twenty-five foot front yard setback is provided. He stated adequate street and drainage are in place and the developers have been asked to consider on site detention for their parking lot. Mr. Ham stated that all problems in regard to water and sewer have been worked out. CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM TOt The Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works DATE; August 300 1984 SUBJECTt BID #9328 - IMPROVEMENTS AT THE DENTON MUNICIPAL. AIRPORT As you know, we will bu opening bids on the Airport Improvement Project on August 30, 1984. These bids are scheduled for consideration of the. Airport Advisory Board on Friday, August 31, 1984. Since this project will be performed using federal grant funds, is is essential that the project be under contract by September 30, 1984. In order to meet this deadline, the City s;ouncil will need to tentatively award this bid on September 4, 1984. After the bid is tentatively awarded, the FAA will prepare the grant offer and submit that document to the City for formal acceptsnca. Once the grant offer is accepted by the City, then the bids can be formally awarded and the project can be put under contract. The bid informe'cion and the Airport Board recommendation will be for- warded to the (:ouncil as soon as possible. Should you have any comments or questions on this matter, please let us know. r' Bill Angelo BA/sc ai I V ~ Ctry of DeNTGN, raxA$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING DFNTON, TEXAS 76201 Tr LEPNONF (817) 566,8204 MEMORANDUM G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: John F. McGrane, Director of Finance DA1'E: August 29, 1984 `IJBJEG'1': Proposed 1'ax Increase 'i'he Proposed 1984-85 budget Is based upon an ad valorem tax increase of $.02 per $100 valuation over the 1983-84 adopted tax rate of $.56 per $100 valuation. The Appraisal District's effective !:ax rate for the city is $.5552 per $100 valuation, State Law requires a record vote and public hearing before adoption of the 19134-85 tax rate when the increase is greater than 3%. The proposed increase to $.58 per $100 valuation is an Increase of 4.67%. 't'herefore, the state law requirements need to be compiled with. The following schedule will meet those requirements, if approved by Gouncil: 1, September 4, 1984 Record vote taken on proposed tax increase 2. September 13, 1,964 Public hearing on proposed tax increase. 3. September 18, 1984 Final adoption of tax increase. If you have any questions or need any further information, please advise. 40 A Jo F. McGrane JFM: bmh 120OF clryotasNTON,rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 h1 B ,41 0 k A l 1) U M DA'M August 30) 1984 To.. G, Chris Hartung) City Manager Rick Sveltla) Assistailt City Manager FROM; SUl1JtiCT; Alignment of Audra Lazio 't'hrough English Village 'file staff has made further review of the alignment of Audra as directed by the Council. At the last meeting the Couucil was concerned about the trees along the east property line of Englisil 4illago. If Lite proposed route as submitted by the developer is used It would indeed take a large majority of #t tie trees out as it result of the street construction, Ilowever, in all likelihood there would be trees left the oil each coide of the road that would not be disturbed by If the street were moved west to miss the majority of the trues along the east line the trees would then become obstacles for the construction of tile homs OhatllwouldVerouttreesudra, be would all likelihood large por pamtios~, andeaccess lti ways oftor rthe icoo1nstruction equipmentariveways, 'l'itre second proposal would also mean that all the houses east of Audra would have to access Audra Lane in order to get out of their property. Since Audra is ultimately classed oas200 secondary arterial with the minimum driveway sp' feet, this would seriously vie Late subdivision regulations, 'file third problem with this concept would be the right of way acquisition and the connection to Audra south of Lattimore Street. 'file right -of -way would have to be acquired and the subsequent intersection would have to be made. It is my uitders1. ait ding that Lite developers are willing to acquire Lite smai1 amount of right of way needed from thJesthu ciali if the eastern alignment is used, Finally, if the is used the old existing Audra would have to remain a G, Chris Hartung August 30, 1984 Page Two viable road since lots that are platted in the Audra Estates subdivision have frontage on Audra, Since Lattimore Street would not be oxtended east from tlie7 new western alignment, !t would mean that the old Audra would have to be tied to this new alignment, This would make an awkward intersection at the juction of the old and new Audra as sliown the accompanying aerials. The accompanying aerials show both alternatives and the associated intersections with each looki rig at those intersections as well as the other problems associated with either alignment. Staff still suggests that the best alignment is the eastern alternative. In any event the staff certainly recommends the connection of Audra and Mingo Road using either alternative, if you or the Council has further questions we will be Happy to try an(] answer them at the meeting. Ric K6 q4 s h a Assistant pity Manager js Attachments 1902NI i PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RLCOOMNDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To,, Denton city council Case No,: Z-1677 Meeting Date; September 4, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Delwin Dorton { 2425 N. Central Expressway Suite 323 Richardson, TX 75080 Status of Applicant: Trustee Requested Action: Change in zoning from single family (SF-7) and agricultural (A) classifi- cations to the planned development (PD) classification, If approved, the PD will permit the development of 251 residential lots (typical lot size 6000 square feet). Location and Size: 52,3 acres located at the northwest corner of Audra Lane and Lattimore Street Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant South - Single family residential, vacant; A, PD-9 East - Single family residential, vacant: A West - Single family residential; SF-7 ` Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity, (Case M Z-1677) Page Two SPECIAL INFORKATV)N Drainage; Drainsge ie a major consideration at this site. Detention and a storm sewer system will be required as well as some channel improvements. Utilities; This development will be served by utilizing and extending existing water and sewer lines in Wayne, Tyler and Lattimore streets, Electric service will be provided; a combi- nation of overhead and underground service is recommended, Gas service is available and telephone and cable T,V, service can be provided. Transportation; A street layout featuring a realign- ment of Audra Lane is proposed. Audra Lane will go north and connect with Nottingham. The portion of Audra Lane from the south boundary of this development to the bend of the road will remain open at the present time for access to residences located there. ANALYSIS The proposed single family detached land use in this request is consistent with Development Guide policies for low intensity areas. The smallest zoning ordinance standard single family lot size is 7000 square feet (SF-7 zoning district); however, sev- eral subdivisions with 6000 minimum square foot lots have been approved in recent years through planned development (PD) zon- ing. Although the 6000 square foot lot trond is now being repeated in the north quadrant of the city, the east quadrant of the city has been impacted more than any other area to date. Six thousand (6000) square foot lots for conventiinal single family detached site built housing is considered reasonable if approved to the point that SF-7 zoning has no practical application and value. (Cage # Z 1677) Page Three ANALYSIS (Continued) The intensity study indicates that there is available intensity in this area based on existing land use. There are 5314.36 trips per day available based on existing land use, The pro- posed development will generate 1769 trips per day; therefore, this development is well within the intensity guidelines for this area based on existing land use. R E COI41rIE NDAT I ON The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1677 by a vote of 6-0 with the following conditions; 1. Preliminary and final plats in accordance with the City of Denton Subdivision Regulations and Land Development Code, shall be secured prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Final street layout will be determined during the platting stage of this development. 3. Single family (SF-7) zoning ordinance standards and building code requirements shall be met unless expressly waived as part of the planned development (PD) zoning process. 4. Single family detached land use on minimum 6000 square foot lots shall be permitted at this site (60' x 100' typical lot size.) 5. Electrical service will be underground except for distribu- tion feeder lines. 6. If 15 percent of, the property is not developed within three (3) years, the property will be reviewed for possible back- zoning. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition with conditions 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Approve petition without conditions 4. Deny petition (Case No. Z-1677) Page Four ATTACHMENTS 1, Aerial 2, Concept Plan as approved by Planning and Zoning Commission on July 25, 1984 3, Alternate Proposal 4. Reply Form Totals 5. Property Owner List 6, Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of July 25, 1984 0708a MOO f1\Mt~~~' M~ .10 i /ice oo~ iii 187 u,.r•: ~ ~ it I : •.l . e e c t ~ \ ~ 1 ILA .t c6t dolt Me L r MAAttS' - i . X V. J 'I SUAAVV F.A.4C z f r 1 ' 7 T- I _J _ i o T11- FF lj As approved by & Z July 25, 1984 i tG q'7 ,N C c~ H o n 1 i r~ + r. r~i \ I ! i ! l , I k Alternate proposal z ~ 7 PROPER'T'Y OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1677 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Maranatha Baptist L. L. Morris 1301 Audra Denton, Texas (One reply form was returned from C. L. Yeatts without indicating whether in favor or opposed.) ov JL,, 'J 1 I f k I ~ i G' •~I O&S/. 7 Ain, I~ _LE f /AAA I)AI.11 I i I ; s JZ)~ /50 ~J 14~1D I s I ft [T n ~ ~.-..,-r. ~ Y/7110 MOP, I-si 140L AA A i AA AA) 12 tpw- L ~ yyvt~-, xdk,-. 22- j7 2,3 'All - - - - - - - w II { I 24~ ! ` a~ 25 r K-►v~ i r I 1 1 i ! ~ dll~srra 1 -r zo -AN . C44 'Y{ ,.1. ~ ~~rti, ~ 1. .._{S..C~vY4 r.H+, ~ ~ .f 1.1 ~ Y': 'C ' ~ ~ ~ ~,k ~ `Si.. mow. ~_y.,F w 1w .M7 I j i i I / r I n V i { i ' I f I I I I P & Z Minutes Page 2 Mr, Sidor made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Seconded by Ms, Cole and carried unanimously III. Public Hearings A. rZ-1677, This is the petition of Delwin Morton requesting a vie in zoning from the single family (SF-7) and agricul- tural (A) classification to the planned development (Pb) classification on a 52 acre tract located at the northwest corner of Lattimore Street and Audra Lane. If approved, the planned development will permit the development of single family detached land use with typical lot size of 6,000 square feet. , Ms, Spivey stated there were 36 reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property; 1 was return- ed in favor and zero in opposition. Mr. Charles Watkins stated he is a planner with Fields, Edwards & Associates and he is representing the petitioner. He described the proposed 52 acre tract and the location. He described the surrounding land uses and stated this is a low intensity area as indicated by the Denton Develop- ment Guide. He stated in discussing the proposed with the area land owners, their concern is that it is a rural area and their fears of it becoming urban. He described the proposed re-routing of Audra Lane, He stated he feels this is consistant with the Development Guide and asked Commission for their approval. On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr, Clark stated Audra Lane will go across to Nottingham and cross the MKT Railroad. Carol Williams stated she lives on Audra Lane and the gave the dimensions of her lots, She stated her oposition is the 60' right-of-way they would be required to dedicate to the City, which would be some 6,000 square feet. She stated she would like to see larger lot sizes there, Ms. Spivey stated the proposed single family detached land use in this request is consistent with the Development Guide policies for low intensity areas. She stated the smallest zoning ordinance standard single family lot size is 70000 square feet (SF-7) zoning districts however, several subdivisions with 6,000 minimum square foot lots have been approved recently through planned development (PD) zoning concept. She stated the intensity study indi- cates there is available intensity in this area based on existing land use and existing zoning, There are 5314.36 trips t:2r day available based on existing land use and 7497.3 trips per day available based on existing zoning. The proposed development will generate 1768 trips per day; therefore, this development is well within the intensity guidelines for this area. She further stated staff recommends P & 2 Minutes July 25, 1984 Page 3 approval with conditions, Mr. Juren asked if 20' of right-of-way will be ob- tained by the city. Mr. Clark stated we will start out with a 45' road. Mr. Sidor asked if it would be necessary for adjacent property owners to dedicate 20' off their property. Mr. Clark said yes, when Audra Lane goes through they would still have to dedicate 20'. Mr. Sidor commented that 251 residential lots are proposed and asked if SF-7, or SF-101 what would be the number of residential lots. Mr. Greg Edwards answered 208 and 210 respectively, Mr. Watkins stated he would like to emphasize with respect to the re-routing of Audra Lane, the petition- er is dedicating 60' of right-of-way and the develop- er does intend to dedicate a part of the land for a park if the city is willing to accept it. Mr. Juren commented he didn't like the idea of the houses having a 15' setback, that it needs to be a 25' setback. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Chairman LaPorte stated we don't currently have an SF-6 zoning and would hate to see it come into the PD zoning. Mr. Claiborne made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1677 with the following conditions: 1.' Preliminary and final plats in accordance with the City of Denton subdivision Regulations and Land Development Code shall be secured prior to issuance of building permits, 2. Final street layout will be determined during the platting stage of this development. 3. Single family (SF-7) zoning ordinance standards and building code requirements shall be met un- less expressly waived as part of the planned de- velopment (PD) zoning process. 4. Single family detached land use on minimum 6000 square foot lots shall be permitted at this site (60 X 100' typical lot size). 5. Electrical service will be underground except for p & x Minutes July 25, 1984 Page 4 distribution feeder lines. Mr, juren seconded the motion and carried unanimously N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZON100 MAP OF THE: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF OR))INANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 ANU AS SAID .oSAP APPLIES TO 52 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT TRI. NORTHWEST CORNER OF LATTIMURE STREET AND AUDRA LANE, AND IS MORE PAATICOLARLY DESCRIBED HEREINI TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN '4UNIISG CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY 'SF-7' AND AGRICULTURAL 'A' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND US6 DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOP- MENT 'PD' CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATIONI AND PROVIDING tOR AN EFFECTI~6 PATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI .iec wn I. That the zoning classification and use designation of the following described property, to-wit) BEING a survey of a tract of land In the William Lloyd survey Abstract No. 77J, Denton County, Texas) and being a part of a certain tract conveyed by Dora Gladys Martin to M. L. Barr by deed dated 4-29-36 and recorded in Beox 257, pg. 345, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; ano being more particularly describea as follows) BEGINNINO at an iron roo In the west line of saiu Barr tract that is north, 16.0 feet from tie southwest corner of said ?arr tract (said southwest corner being the south line of said L.ayd Survey); THENCE north 00034110" east, 648.33 feet to a fence post fir a cornert THENCE east, along a fence, 1151.32 feet to a fence post ",r a Qurnert THENCE south 46045133' west along a fence (the centerline cf an abandoned lane), 969.66 feet to an iron roo for a corner is the south line of said Lloyo Survey in Audra Lahe; WHENCE west, along the south line of said Lloyd Survey, ~4.b6 feet; THENCE north 00034110' east, 16.0 feet to a point Ina fence; THENCE west 356.61 feet to the point of beginning ano containing 12.091 acres of land. All that certain 40.227 acre tract, or parcel of land situated in the J. D. Lilly Survey, Abstract No. 762 and the William Lloyd Survey, Abstract No. 773, City and County of Denton, Texas; said tract being tract oc-upled on the ground as ::acts described in deed from Bishop Neeley to G. H. Neeley 3s recoraeu in Volume 150, Page 325 of the Deed Records of Denton CO.inty, Texas) said tract being further described herein by metes and UoLLlids as tullowst BEGINNING for the southwest corner of the tract being oescribed herein, at the center of crosstie corner post in the north line of Lattimore street at the southeast corner of Lot 18, Block Six, Z-1677/DEL'WIN MORTON/PAGE 1 VolumeoA,, Page l8 lot he Plats Records of DentontCounty,rTexaseid in .,:'ENCE north 0019' west 1598.$ feet along the general course of Block 6 and Block 4 of said Mozingo Addition to an iron pin set the tsoutheasterrn line e of o the T. & P R.R. / riK9zIngO ght of wayltlon and in THENCE north 68037140' east 1036,3 feet along said railroad right of way to a 6 inch fence corner post at the northwest corner of tract aeoc(ibea in used to Chester Sparks as recorded in Volume 3861 Page 573 of the Ueed Reoorus of Denton County, Texas) nthe orth general l oi osaid of THENCE " ns old fence lines to an pin set t in along Lattimore Street (unplattea at tnis plaoe)l THENCE sth existingotence yline along the northern along hOf general course to the place of beginning, is hereby changed from Single family "SF-7' and Agricultural 'A" District Classification and Use designation to Planned Development "PO" Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTTUN I1. That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building within the planned development district, the following conditions shall be meta 1 lines, Electrical service, bprovided byt underground f or distribution feeder 2. All lots U901 iOr single tamily detached housing shall be a minimum of 6,000 square feet in area (60' R 100' typical lot size). SECTION III. That the development ut the property shall to in sunstantial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Zoning Map of the City of DentOno eX as, tado ptCe`de toe 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. nditions 69-11 District,Cland the same assltication iandeUseysub3ectdtootheoabovehcochange In and specifications. SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, nereby finds that such change it, in accordance with comprenenstivhe sine plan for the purpose of promoting C'.ty of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with humanvilivet conserving the value of the nuldprotecting ti land for the and encouraging the most appropriate maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens, z-1677/ uLwIN MORTON/PAGE 2 SECTION V. That this orainance shall be in full force and effect i;:,meaiately after its passage and approv411 the required public herrings having heretofore been held by the Piaaiiing and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 19$4. RICHARD O. STEW ART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTI CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi JOE D. .MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTONI TEXAS SYt I 5;-1677/DELWIN AORTON/PAGE 3 I r .flo )Pb 1 v.t 10 A MI1.CI ; of I I 4 - (i 30 k 1 191141 -Pt j-__•.__.---~I- 1 ' __._~--.-.-I r ' b t d 1 ~~i.{k C..•\~-~W~ • oLLL......~~~ ~..::.1L~" f lil ~j - .i _~_I I .e.~t,, r.. 1 ~ .S ~ 1 • r ( 1 - I I ' - -il - X61 / ' ' i U THdMC6 to 1 1[ 1 'SI \i a 1 1 1 I r /,1.% -J w"w , IY 1 ~-k!1_ ~ 1-~3..!` 4S .al...-~--- III ~I C._.~, ~ - ~ ~ 1~•^!J . f B I 01. m 1 r.-• , 11- V , 1 t_ /1% I y t 11 I i 1 11 ri 1~ ~T1 ~ ~ •-I.11 w- l I I I. Y•1 ~I' r ~1JI YY III ~^-_TI' -.1._Y Jh s - R C6 t r ° II r 1 I - rr t I ~ti r I _ I' 1 I. 1 y I I C ' St4 f ~ -0C I ' ..L ~11 , ,r o 1 rule 'r 4M Su ClIPEY u{, qLE r,t _ 1.1`vst.~ C "stet 1 t 1 11 , f 1 O v! llll . 77 II I 11 I _ II t 11 I i _ ~ 1~ - t711rrrel+t -3inb _ 13. I i a.e ,loc}I I, it 3iI It I% F r1 yyl l~r I _ 1 n> - I - _ l l III-' I ' I1~ .r 1~..__ r 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Septemuer k, 1984 SUBJECT: Consider proposed authorization to perform professional services for design of approximately 7000 feet sanitary sewerline in conjunction with John Pass Investments from property on Dallas Drive to Pecan Creek/Woodrow Lane twin outfall interceptors, SUMMARYi On July 24, 1984, the City Council approved a recommended Public Utility Board agenda item concerning this same subject. That is, a sewerline which would be constructed and funded by John Pass Investments with participation by the City of Denton of ovorsizing and 50% cost-sharing of engineering design and obtainment of easements for subject sewerline, As background concerning this sewerline from Dallas Drive Along Duncan Street along creek bad to Pecan Creek/Woodrow Lane twin outfall interceptors, this existing 10" sewerline has become serious'y overloaded as a result of the large number of multi-family units having been constructed along Dallas Drive and Teasley Lane. Mr, John Pass was advised that any further development of his property on Dallas Drive and Teasley Lane would necessitate a new sanitary sewerline to handle the sewer flow quantity involved. Mr. Pass has agreed to construct the necessary sewerline and at the July 24, 1984, meeting, approval was finally obtained for the Utility Department to enter into an oversizing up to 18" sewerline size plus 50% cost-sharing of engineering charges plus 50% cost-sharing of easement charges. Cost of easement charges are estimuted at this time and will not be known until surveys are completed and property owners approached to obtain necessary costs for easements. The attached authorization for professional engineering services has been submitted by Mr. John Pass who is requesting that the engineering design be accomplished by Lichliter/Jameson & Associates, 'inc. of Dallas, Texas, FISCAL SUMMARY; Lichliter/Jameson & Associates has provided the following proposal for performing the design of the subject project; Field surveying $15,000 Construction 6,500 Design and Drafting 80500 Total $30,000 According to the sewerline oversize participation agreement, 509 of these costs would be chargeable to the City of Denton Utility Department, i,e „ $15000. Agenda Item page 2 SOURCE O1: FUNDS: Sewer bond funds account 0624-008-04719114 This project has not specifically been identified in the Capital Improvements Program, However, monies have been set aside for oversizing and collection mains sufficient to fund such a project. ACTION REQUIRED: City Council cecommendation for approval or disapproval. of the attached authorization for profeasional engineering services in the amount of $15,000. ALTERNATIVES: 1, Approve request of John Pass for this authorization for professional engineering services through the use of Lichliter/Jameson & Associates, Inc, at an amount of $15,000, 2, Disapprove request by John Pass. 3, Modify request by John Pass. RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utility Board at their August 15, 1984 meeting recommended approval of the attached "authorizations" to perform professional engineering services and recommended Denton pay 507 of such professional servieeu of Lichliter/Jameson & Associates, Inc, Respectfully, 1 Robert E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I City Council Agenda Item dated July 24, 1984 EXHIBIT IT Sewerlinl oversize design and easement agreement EXHIBIT III Public Utility Board approval. of this oversize agreement EXHIBIT IV Authorization for professional engineering services from Lichliter/Jameson and Associates, Inc, to Mr, lohn Pass EXHIBIT V Minutes of Public Utilities Board Meeting 8-•15-84 nd Pass Agea:HAM Jul), 24, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: t'onsider Proposed Pro Rata and Oversize Agreement with John Pass, Investments, for, a New Sanitary Sewerline from his property on Dallas Drive, along Duncan Street, along Creels Bed to Pecan Creek Woodrow Lane Twin Outfall Intercentors. S U'Ift R Y : Mr, J.T. Pass of John Pass Investments is considering the development of multi-family units adjacent to Dallas Drive and Teasley Lane. Mr, J.T. Pass was informed about 3 months ago by the Utility Department that sanitary sewer capacity was not available to accommodate additional development in this area, Mr. Pass was advised that sanitary sewer servi.e would be available upon the construction, either the City of Denton or by the developer, of a new sanitary sewerline which would follow the routing as stated above. The length of this line would be approximately 5,900 feet, . Such a sanitary sewerline is urgently needed in this area to alleviate the heavy loading created multi-family units on Teasley Lane, Dallas Drive and I-35. Mr, Pass has recently contacted Mr, David Ham, Assistant Director of Utilities, Water/Wastewater Divisions, with the proposal that John Pass Investments construct a sanitarv sewerline in the location as indicated, and that t'--e City share in oversizing, pro rata, and engineering design, It is the opinion of the Utility Department that as much as an 18" sanitary sewer main should be constructed in this location, not only to serve Mr. Pass' development, but any other additional developments that may wish to t,.e-on in the future. FISCAL SUrtIARY: Costs are estimated as follows: Total cost of this project to serve all areas :)f deve'.oo;nent 5,900' of 18" Sewer Line m $35/ft 206,500 Engineering Costs-10% of construction $20,650 Easement Casts-5% of construction $10,350 i Total Cost of this Project ~2371500 3048U:14 CQ$t or this project to serve John Pass Development 5,900' of 10" Sewer Line @ $21/ft $123,900 Engineering Costs-50/50 share $10,325 Easement costs-50/50 share $5,175 Cost of this Project to John Pass $139,400 I Cost of this project to the City of Denton: Difference between an 18" & 10" sewer line $82,600- 'ngineering Costs-50/50 share 10132-5 Easement Costs-50/50 share $5,175 Cost to City $98,100- Source of Funds: Sewer Bond Funds Acct 0624-008-0471-9114 This project has not specifically been identified `_n the Capital Improvements Program, However, monies have been • set aside for oversizing and collection mains sufficient to fund such a project, ACTION REQUIRED: City Council approval or disapproval of participating in the oversizing, pro rata and design with easement attainment with Mr, John Pass, Developer, ALTERNATIVES: 1. Disapprove request of John Pass for this s-nitarv sewer main. 2, Approve request by John Pass, 3. Modify request by John Pass, RECOMMENDATION: The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of -7-J1y 2, 1984, recommended to the Council that oversizing, pr rata, engineering design participation and easement attainment for an 18' sanitary sewer main from near Teasley Lane and Dallas Drive east along Duncan Street to Creek, alor.3 Creek . to Pecan Creek and tying into twin sanitary sewer interceptors on Woodrow Lane (5,900'). 3048U:15 Respectfully, e ~ I-lid ~ R. E, Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Letter of Request- John Pass II Location Map III Sbwerline oversize, design and easement agreement IV Sewerline Pro Rata Aireement V PUB Minutes of Julv 1984 • • 3048U;1F p 1 J 0 H N PA S,11 D INVESTMHNT.S I 7557 Ssmoler AO.. Sud# 1000 0811". Y/xls 7629, (214)36$•637s June 28, 1984 Mr. C. David Ham Asisistant Director of Utilities Water/Wastewater Divisions Denton, Texas Dear fir, Ham: We own a 10.962 acre tract of land north of Teasley Lane adjacent to Dallas Drive It is our understanding that to develop this property a new sanitar-- sewer system would need to be constructed by the City of Denton because present sewer system isn't adequate to accommodate any new development, After discussion with Tim Fisher some three months ago and with you more recently, we are willing to furnish funds to construct approximately 6,CIN ieet of ten inch sanitary sewer, It is our understanding that the City of Dentc_ will provide funds if the sewer line is to be oversized, We are also willing to participate in the funding of engineering expenses • incurred on this project to e_ti-pedite the completion of this vroject as scc-. as possible, We look forward to working with the City of Denton on this project and 'ac:;- u'_ly not only will it benefit our project but also future pro,',ects as .e:_. Sincerely, JOKN PASS I~n'£5TD~\"i'S J.T. Pass Partner JTPtmd E ,~Sy ~f WI o IVVnIIIN ';I rte. ant Grove ZI ; ! j1 r 41 1i« L.~ ,I Ir ~»a. ••I. 77, Il ` l o / • a..::e 1 u r 4:1 Ii r ~I SQL \ . • ~ ~ \ 3! 10 .4i IF 1.•.yfX7' ~ \S . • ~ ~ l 1 41 9E'dEALI4E UVEA9ItiE PAkTICiPATjON AOkEKNENS THE STATE Of TUAS X KNOW A4L ,4EH SY THESE PRESEfiTSt , COUNTY Of DENTON x 'THAT RHEREAS, JOHN PASS Me-4rHENTS, 755) Ranoler Aoad, Suite 1000, Dallas, Texae, 15231, 12141 363"6774, is the Developer of oertaln proparr/ dnown on the attached map, 'inr:n map is incorporated nerein as if jet forth ill tu110 in the Clt}' 7t Denton, Denton County, Texan, and furtner 0080C good as property on South Dallas Dnve, and oevelops r do aIC10 to nerve such property Alto 5,90u feet of onsits and offstte sewer tine faallitlesl ina, 'dkEHEAS, the Clty of oantJn and it 04 tnat aJ C:1 on and of fdite Sewer faellitie9 Pe oversized and the Ity 'a 111 }artialpdte in the addl,ttons! coat Qt tine averalzud fact it Les putj'.jnt to the provisions of the Denton Uevelopcianc 'od(l Appendix A tr ;ne Code of ofoinanees of the City of Denton, 'rexast Yw W64 , TREREfURE, :Nis AQAEENENT, :Made .r„s :K 19y vt 19d4, uy and oetauen JOHII PASS 0VEST8Eh75, Jail)$, Tex 3, n dtnalter called 'Developer, and the Clt! :f Denton, Texas, A Hume Rule munlclpai Corpotat1Qn of the State vF Cexaa, hereinafter palled 'City'! n'f TN ESS ETH: The Developer ill install, oy contract „ ,t he rdl;e, an 14- aeXer line and neoesdary jj?,uQrtenances to it'Cv ire VC uperty . desorihed on the attached nap in aaceruance with all c:t:l of Denton ordinances, ruled, ragUlat10n8, policies and prucedurei. rile Sala facilities Shall ae located IS shoWn on the at:acned Map 4nidh 1s naue at part noreof for All intunts and purpujes, 7r.a engineering ~ea13n and easement pur:haseo tai 3ucn line .riil oe oa:., on a nag it; oetWeen the :levelopet Ina the ilty. 2. Thu City's snare of sft a eetImatod of 3ald facilities IS 02 61.1 U for COnStfUCtidn, W,.125 fd: anginet) rIng design, and $5,175 for aasvment3, a total of ¢?a, 100. Jpon completion of oonstructlon and acceptance oy the .'.cy of aald taclllcles, tilt' actual -:USC a t - h^ -'1ty's paftri•>a::on In Said faclltcIeA snail de aecevminea and cartltied to et' Director .t Utilities, and his carC lficate settln'3 out the CIty'3 :ost of Sala tact I ities Snail oe attached hereto and Made a part oe:e.t, JOHN PASS IOVESTBENTS, SE'SERLINE )VERS1ZE PAAr:C IPA:l::. AGREEM EN: PAGE -,NE • Che 4tty shall pay tot its ahara of the faciilatea within tnitty IJ91 days from the date of aooeptahae of this tit ciIt tiao ot~ under avCh terma and cundttiona that arb mutually Acoept401e to the parttea, . 4. Title to said faellitlot %a neraby end sisal: It al'. times no 'leated in tna elty, S, The oeveloper dnall and does her edy agree to indemntfj and hold narmleas the Clty from any and all damagea, load of itaotlity of any kind 'dhatsoeVer, oy reason of in)ury to Pr.)petty 0c ill iris "(non occaa Ione a oy any act Or omI as Ion, neg left of 4 rong•d0I Aq Ot Ue V0 lope r, ltd of (1094 a, agents, ampioyeea, %nVI to aa, duntractors or othar persona with ragas to tna pertormaoc a oe ..1 la Contract, and A)avaIapar will, at tta own Cost Arid a%panda, Aaften a end peotast against any and All such cla, a and Ioman0s. 1:1 tl ITN ESS wHER EOt'~ told Instrument vd d., aC'.l ted in i tctrltcate o[IJtnaLs ~-,ISda/.)t A,d„ lNd+. Jutr-sys\d 1'vssFaiEUls t.'trNea' CYIY F 'SNTV;', TE4A- RU dA t /JL4 ATTEST: CHARLO'PTE LLEN, CITY SECReSARi . CITY JF DENTON, rSUS J22ROVEO AS TO LEGAL iORiht HudER'r a. :1VNiEH~ ASSISTANT CITY A'T40RNEY .NHN PASS INVES2.4EN'IS, SEIIERI.INE JVLAS: Z7 PAA-'C1 PAt'1 ~N A3df.ENEt.: PAGE °n0 Ew x4 N o Ar,aq~r,; THE STATE Or VXAB 7 AL. MtrsY THE4E PRESENTS; • COUNTY JLNTON 1 CHAT THIN AOREEMENT is 14144 tnisp day otiQQV" 1964 oy ono oatwuen the City of Denton, a .NUnloipal Corporattot o ne County of Denton and the State of Tex40, neretnaft4r refarr4d to as 'City' ana JOHN PASS INVESTMENT& nuceinaftar referred to as 'Vwn4r'. "".SSETBi so041, AS, own VC will In at all a sewer lone trom the City Of Denton's, Woodrow Lane existing sawer lane lppr ox (mate Ii 5,900 feet i to Ownmr's joy aIopmont on the South slue of Dallas ~rtve and the wtl9C 3lde of TBd9lay !,Shat and 'IHEHEAS, In oraei to 3arve Snia aevelopnen: with so-. 4t 39tVic r Wlil I,e rayatred to pay the cost of ailoo feet ;t 3 eY. n t' ilntl In Lne limits of Denton Ind wilt axteho auto se.et Inv as JesvtSDed 3JuVe poraUdnt tw the ptvvtsions I" etfaot M .:.e uate of tnia Ayreament of the Denton uevelopment Moue Appendix A, to + too Coat of UrJlnanceu Jr Lou city of Jt'11tun, 7a:i33, as Mototatc ameadoui ano +NEREAS, the Owner :iuntres to receive rII.Z,uraMoll t f:,r 9Ucu Coat unu ar the provialona or data Denton Mye:0y .nano Cute 'St the ;lt'y of Denton, TexaSr MM THEAEFOHE, to SunslderAt IJO Ot the PC ~claao ant the mutual covenants ano agroemahca nereinatter provtiea, the parties nereto ogres as follows; I, That for and in constweration of one const:.sti n so sewer line extension for the oanefit Ot Owner ins the , the it: agrees to reimourae Owner not to exCeed his :Q11 .1 viNJtrRC:I:.0 only of such main axtenston the eettmaLed sum of 4.::.-c0 15,900' $21 per footI unaer the provisions in affect on .,acv of in 3 Denton Developent Coue Agreement of tna City Jt '.ant;., texas, as heretofore amanoed with the following limitations; A, Reimbursement costs wiII oe Yurittea or, the Direct:t of 'JtItitlas or nis destynee oases on letisI nos :a :t Visits sewer line conattucuon as pvsentau uy ,ne Owners, S. After the expiration of twenty t20i tiara from cote of tae numpletIon of trio aewa: 'stn e.ttenai:n, wnICh Will De completed Snout Nover.Der 1984, r.~ tut tno r rexmuur sement 4ha 11 ue made to J.ner, C. The relnmbursement .=nail not apply to ^.a in uxtenstans constructed oy too city of DenLOn or Unoer Its directions from any rain aonstrw:[lun .,:,oar out terms. Ot tnIS Agreement. D. Reimbursement payments snail be made t. the owner or their assigns if written, and to no otref person151. JOHN PASS TNVESTAENTS, SE',YERLI:iE PRO RATA AGHE'V201' - PAGE JP+E Tne C9WOUrWent AtO;094W ;hall os payaoIa only from (Mis to OLY9d D'y the City p9csUant to 74t0 Denton Development Code 1 P, There 411411 00 a maximum of twenty 1$0) 'yaats 44 the p9riod tt eltgtbtllty wn9retn this original :notAllor of the ndih may Ceque9t retmbersoment et i r o rata payments under this Agreement, Tne p+riod of sltgibility shall begin as the dite tinal inspection and acoeptano9 of the ox tons icn D; the Ctty. 0 All pro rata tees Incurred under the provisi:ra of tr,e Denton Development Code snail oe Palo 1IfIC:.f to the City and the City $4411 traneter amounts •j.i :v owner wttnin tnirty IiDI days of receipt. tI. That for and In Co nelo or at ton of the Agrvomv i,:a td De pertotmed oy the CLtj as atoresald, owner nereDy .rxnafi:a to the city a I I of its rights, title and interest in ana ::.e rain extension d03Crt0 ed aoove, and any and all easements a.;: tht of way agreements aeJOrea Uy tnem for the purpose of 1JCatln4 ,aid matn e.Vtensions. 'h'ITNESSETH the hands o'. :ne Parties nmreto :n t 137 ana rear ttrat aouvu ,tit:sn. JOHN PASS ,SYEai?'ES;; ;what. $ Y CITY VF )EtIro:,. A IC AS D ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEAS APPROVED AS TO U-GAL FORM: ROBERT 8. HUNTER ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CONSIDER ABANDQ1q)KZNT OF A PORTIOT' OF 4I`IP ISTINQ 6" w KFAU5Z A 1 = ST. ; Staff, redommen e t ,ac C ...s a an onment e approve A'Fr such approval be passed on to the City Council, After discussion with Staff, Nancv Bovd made a motion to approve and recommend to the City Council approval of t',`1 e abandonment of the easement. Leonard Herring second, all aver, no naves, motion carried. lO. CONSIDER PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND OVERSIZE AGREEMENT '„'ITX 70 k S D S:Rr::T, ALONGED TJ U~ EE}: TWIN OUTFr,LL IINTZRCEFTORS: notion made ov '.~ancy Boy co approve the L_E $ participation, ;-eco=end to the City Council Second by .eonar d rie r r'_ng A1.1 ayes, no naves, motion carr iec . C' S ~i7 R ?P,C% DING WATE?.l5E'~ C?. S .,F"'' C- C JC S 0=;"w L t _ L Y L:. l~F./ .r` J V.. OF .LV S`SNi. i J"•~~~ Ca'`:+.^..~ 7O.'/•te - V A A ,r f~V1,1L• ~S ~\.!A': ._L' ~\...ri.. i . ^ V.C. ? L L iecnard :lerring made a Wotio::, iNan,:y Soya second, t ~CVide an oversized agreement fcr 'Rater and sewer .roes r, J0 St0rer, t0 ?roviae a water line a n C sewer line, k' _Ch the City' rNa%" ng for the oversize O` t,ne -ater:_ne t,", it8 Cis\' i_ _ 5 CCk r ?C'OcCC; t4 ^e r8 i1r0ad Underpass. 4.11 aves, nc naves, =otion carr':ed v^."CLE:^R PR0^...1G N .a S= I L~1 Cr ! Y: 1 ,/11n ~1 . • lUINil -41 _1_ , rl r h C)7'7 y 1.\ l.1^I ' I IN ^t C: rL~^{ Cr Y t.i... C ")7"-,-)" anc ' ce /c s?ccnd _e^-,arc 'err _ng to re":--end a7 rova: of t'ne sewer ser%•_ce cLts_de ::he c. I s to MC10nneI fter a br.e_ ~iscuss.on, 7; ot_en ce iec ;;.ree a.:es, r/c ^,aves, =ot.on car._ed L.U. S C r. LOSOL RE r, z;0 S:'P,MER S ry S✓e:>~p.a.nec .ile S~tL'an t`.Cr. tr.at certain pa::ing spaces would have to 'oe dedicated `or the 7CSe o_ .ac_n padmounts in o':cer to 7rcvide underground electric service to the Den:on sc,uare. order to facilitate this procedure, certain parking space: a%e peen designated for use by the electric serN•ice to lace transformation equipment. rfter aiSCUssion, Leonard !;erring moc'oned that the .;-ac Commissian and the City Council adopt these iccations designated for exclusive use .'leccric 1't.1it • ~vste for .osta lat_en c_ pa6mour,t ecu.pir, ert. ee a;:es, :c na;,es, motion carried, UJ,:1 :V 1'j lY UchIIter/Jameson & Associates, Inc, CONSUSnNGENGINEMNG P1ANN1NO SURVEYING July 17, 1984 Mr, J, T. Pass John Pass Investments 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 1000 Dallas, Texas 75 31 Re; Offsite Sanitary Sewer Woodhill Apartments, Phase III Denton, Texas Dear Mr. Pass, Please accept this letter as our proposal to perform profess lonaI enginee Ing services required in conjunction with your development of WoodhiII Apartments, Phase 111, in Denton, Texas, General • We understand this project to be the installation of an offs!te sanitary sewer main from a point on the south side of Dallas Drive, approximately 700 feet west of Teasley Lane, northeasterly along a drainage channel a distance of approximately 6,700 feet to the 2411 Pecan Creek Sewer OutfalI Interceptor No, 2, This project is required to serve Woodhill Apartment:. Phase 111, an 11 acre tract of land located south of Denton Drive, north of Phases I and 11 of Woodhill Apartments, Since the project will be crossing U,S, Highway 77 and the M.K. L T, railroad, approval of the project plans by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportat'cn and the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company will be required, as well is approval by the City of Denton. in addition, the crossing of a number f privately owned properties will require the acquisition of utility ease- ments to accommodate the project, Scope of Services Lichliter/Jameson E Associates proposes to provide professional engineerilo services required in the design and construction or the project described above, and to represent the Owner, as required, in matters related to the project, i 1430 E.NPiRE CENTRAL SUITE 230 OAILAS rEXAS 75247 114/630.8667 Page Two Mr. J,T, Pass July 17, 1984 Basic Services The following engineering services are to be considered "Basic Services" under this proposal; 1, Perform a field survey to establish horizontal and vertical control along the project route, including locating both existing and pro- posed easements, to accommodate the project. 2. Perform field survey and prepare legal descriptlons and sketches of easements to be acquired across private properties, not to exceed 15 parcels, 3. Prepare and submit to the City, State and M,K,6 T. Railroad for approval, engineering plans for the project and represent the Owner in gaining approvals, 4. Provide all prlnts of engineering plans required in the bidding and construction of the project up to 30 sets, 5. Assisi' the Owner as required In the solicitation, receipt, and evaluation of bids for the construction of the project. 6. Perform construction staking for the project on a one-time basis, including reasonable re-staking (10%) as required. Additional re- staking as needed and authorized by the Owner or Contractor is to be considered and "Additional Service" and Is to be Invoiced monthly on the basis of time and materials exoended. Responsibility of the Owner 1. It is expressly understood that the Owner is to be responsible for the payment of any fees charged by the City, State, or other agency for construction permits, plan review, construction inspec- tion, utility connection or pro-rata. 2. The Owner is to be responsible for tl•t acquisition of all necessary easements to accommodate the construction of this project. Schedule for Performance of Engineering Services Lichliter/Jameson 6 Associates proposes to begin work on this project immediately upon acceptance of this proposal by the Owner and receipt of authorization to proceed with the work, and to pursue completion of plans and approvals required in a timely mariner, • t chwer,Jarneson s Assooates, Inc Page Three Mr, J.T. Pass July 17, 1984 Compensation Lichllter/Jameson proposes to perform all tasks described In this proposal under "Basic Services" for the following amounts Field Surveying: $15,000,00 Construction Staking; 6,500,00 Deslgn L Orafting; 8,500,00 TOTAL $30,000,00 The Owner will be involced monthly based upon the percentage of work completed, We appreciate very much the opporturiity to offer this proposal for your cons-i atlon and approval, and we look forward to working with you on tills roject, Very t my r V F, Elsey Jr,, P,E, Ljlk e~'P r e s i d t BFE/jb Accepted By:___ -Date; _ Title: Li_liiitcllJameson,. Associates. Irc LICNLITER/JAM~$ON 6 ASSOCIATES INO DATE REOVESTE?:~~ y PROJECT MANAGEtr nna ~aryso . AUTHORISATION TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JOB NO,; 54+,a ,,l t, q1 Requested 8yl 4, f. Pass Investments 7557 Rambler Road, suite 1000 Dallas. Tx. 75231 DrOJQCIt Woodhill Apartments, Chase III Denton, Texas Location: Description: Boundary Survey Scope of 'w'ork to Se Performed under this AuthorStaticnt ` nt,r'n of ea,e'v^ti for 31' proour(ias afreetCd try sdni(3ry )ewer, Cement S Billing Information: . Work to be Performed in accordance with Schedule of Hourly Rates, W ! a; Policy 3rd Liability Limitation As Indicated cn reverse s)do of this sheet is Time and Materials Contract Amount S~ , L.1 Hourly Rates Witt, Other (Specliyl S Estimated Budget S Hourly Rates Not To Exceed $ - This authorization will On StItute the basis of an agreement between tme Client and the £nginedr for the services and compensation arrangement indicated hire - , and must be signed by Client And returned to I,Ichllter/Jameson d Associates, tnc. ;r+or la conlencin- the work, If, at the Client's specific request, wOrk I$ COminenred rerbAl authOri- ration, in advance of receipt of this executed agreement, such wort 10' be considered to have been performed in accordance with the terms and conditions ^!reln Staled. If this authorization Is not executed and returned to LichllterrJamescn S associates, Inc. within ten (10) days from the date sent, work will be stopped;amd Clbe~,ll be billed for time s9ent to that date, _ AGREED TO AT DALLAS, TEXAS LICHEE! AM S ,IATES, ;X , 1 JI i FOR. OAT GATE; SEE SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES, BILLING, POLICIES AND LIABILITY LIMETAT:,`NS IN REVERSE S:GE w LICHLITER/JAMESON & ASSOCIATES, INC CATS REQUESTED; 7/20/84 PROJECT YAiiAO(RI Walter Nelsor AUTHDRIEArION r0 PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JOB NO.; 544.0207.07 ROQUeSted By: J, T. Pass Investmem,l. '557 Rambler Road, Suite 1000 Project: Dallas, Tx. 75231 Woodhi II Apartments, Phase 111 tocallo^; Oenton, Teaas Cescrlgtlpn; easlc Services iCooe of work to be ?erformed under this Authorization; Design and drafting for if$ s;ta sanitary sertr Comments; 811 ling Information; Rork to be performed in accordance with Schedule of Nourty Rates, Blltiny Policy and UAW I ty Limltatien as Ind(cated on reverse side of this sheet is ralla,i; Time and Naterlals d Contract Amourt S 1.500 )O Hourly Rates with ~ Other {Speclfyi Estimated Budget S hourly Rates 'lot To Exceed S 'his auth0riz4tl0n will constitute the basis of an agreement between the Client and the Engineer for the services and cc mpenSat 1gm arrangerenl fndl cated he el n, and must be signed py rIIant and returned to Llchllter/James en 4 Associates, Inc, :r for to cCcnencInc the wort. If, it the : V ant's 'peclftc requeSI, work Is corCSended on verbal authori - zalion, In advance of recel pt of this executed agreement, such work rill be considered to have been performed In accordance with the terms and condlteonS r4lein stated. If tnis authorization is not executed and returned to Llchllter/Jawhe-SW S kssoCiateS, Inc, I Ithln ten (S0) days from the date rent, work will be stoPPeO snd'Cllent will be 01 led for time spent to that date, AGREED TO AT OALLAS, TEXAS LICHLITER/JAHESS `gciATES, INC, BY: By -~T CAT OATS: SEC SCHEDULE Of uOURLY RATES, BILLINU PM IClES ANO LSABZLITY IIMI*ATlPhS CH AEYEASE S!D£ • LICHLITERNAMESON ASSOCIATES INC, WE REQUESTto1 f aRt PROJECT MANAOtRt Don Jaa ksen AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 408 NO,t S 6 0•OS Requested 8yi J. T. Pass Invostments )$57 Rambler Road, Sul to 1000 Projoctl Dallas, ta, )S7)1 VoodhiII APar tmen t s, Phase rll locatlodt Denton, Texas Owriptiont Construction Staking Scope Of Vrrk to be Performed under this Authoritationt Stare aoorox;mate ly coo feet of Sanitary weer at 100' intervals and cut sheets su Coiled. Cnrments: Rilling Information: Work to be Performed in accordance with Schedule of Hourly Rates, 81Iling Policy and . 'liability Limitation as Indicated on reverse side of this sheet as follcrs: Time and Materials E Contract Amount S o.5co-co Hourly Rates with Other (Spocify) S Estimated Budget $ Ll Hourly Rates Not To Exceed S This al'thoritati0n will constitute the basis of an agreement between the and the Engineer for the services and compensation arrangement Indicated herein, and must e signed by Client and returned to llchliter/Jameson b Associates, inc. Prior to contrenet^ the work, If, at the Clilnt'S SPecific. request, work is ComnenCed upon verbal authpri• tatl0n, In ddYdnt! Of receipt of this executed agreement, Such work x111 be Considered this aauthoeltationrIS "t executedtandlreturnedetoSLlchliter/JamosoneL AssoesateS, In<. within ten (10) days from the date sent, / work wi11 be StoPP4d and CIIonl will be billed or time SDe lit to that date, 46REED TO AT OALLAS, TEXAS LLCHLI R kK r~~4S..OCIATES, INC, - - BOR: 9Yt r`~.~; ;.F? SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES, 8ILLiN5 POLICIES AND LIARItITY LIMIT tToNS CN RES'ERSE Si c t I CHLI I [A/ )AMC SON 4 ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT YANAM: Oon Jackson AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVI CS JOB NO,: 4 A•OIOy 16 _ ReRPetled Sy: d, T. PASS In Vaalmanls 7557 Rambler Road, Suite 1000 Dallas, Tx, 15231 Project Dreanvillm HMIs Location: Dreanvllle, roles OeSOriptf dnl "As Bullls" Scope of Fort to be Performed under this Authoritation: Conrent t : Billing Inecr,naliow • Wort to be Derformed In accordance with Schedule of Nouely Rates, 8 1111ng Polity and Liability Limitation AS Ind ICated en reverse $1 de of this sheet as follows; u Time Ind Materlals t:1 ContraCt Mount S rj Hourly Rates with d Other (SDetiry) S _ Estimated Budget S 4,500.00 Lj Hourly Rates 40t To Exceed S This authorl;atlon x111 constitute the basis of an agreement between the Client and the Engineer for the services and compentation arrangement Indicated nerein, and °vst to Signed by Client and returned to LIChl Iter I Jameson b Associates, Inc. Prior to Cd Vencin the wort AGREED TO AT DALLAS, TEXAS LICNIHE AM£3011 L. CIAP(S, 1,4C, BY: FOR O AM: DA~E: SEE SCHEDULE Of HOURLY RATES BILLING POLICIES ANO LIABILITY LlM1iATIONS r!i qEvERSE S11E SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES, OIL LINO POLIOIES AND 1,101LITY LIMITATIONS Ci -is$IIIgatIon of Emb10 e6 Hour lIY Aa;rs Principal Consultant $ es .1)" Director/Department stead b0, a4 Project Manager Sj Project Man4ger/Pl4nninq i Landscape Architecture 53,04 Project Planner/Plirninq S tandscioe Architecture 44 .1,11, Engineer 48.09 Landscape OesigneN Planning 5 Landscape Architecture )2,04 Designer 40,07 Landscape Oraftsman/Planning s Landscape Architecture 31.OQ Draftsman )4Q Survey Technician M. G(: Registered Surveyor AS .70 Resident Project Aepeesentative )8.CC Two Man Party SS.:Q Three Han Party 7D ~'I Four Man Party Clerical 12. Cost of survey supplles, blueprinting, copying telephone, out •af•town travel expenses and other non. IStoe charges directly related the project will be 6111ed at cost, on a reimbursable basis, In aJ lion to the fees agreed upon for services rendered, AtI survey venIctt mileage will be Lilted at a rate of S.30 per mile. Vie of electronic r stance .measuring equipment of 11 be subject to a supplemental charge a' S50.4J per day, filing lees, permit fees and other sgecfal chsr)es +~•ch ere advanced on behalf of the client -111 be billed on a similar 7.1 t,s at 110% of cost. Billings for services rendered x111 be made monthly and aiy*en: is re• quested within fifteen (15) days of receipt of invoice, Unle+s special arrangements ire made, a finance charge of Is per month will a added to unpaid 1a)ahces more than thirty (30) days old. Lichilter/Jamesoo S Associates, Inc. makes no warranty, either txoreis or implied, as to its services, including preparation of plans sort speclflca• tions, cost estimates, s'Irveys or professional advice, except '•I+at they are prepared, Issued anu performed In accordance with general'. accepted professional engineering and surveying practices. Owner agreai that the liability of Licht Iter/Jameson S Associates, Inc. for any neg' - pence, error or omission In connection with the services provided shall no: isceed the total compensation received for said services. , , ~ICMLITER/JAMESON 1~~ASSOCiAT_,, ES AMC oAre 9(W(5r£o;_ 1ROJECT MINAOER; n l.,rl,nn AUTMORIIATION to P€RRORM PAOf£SSIONAt, SERVICES Joe NO,: S~L•020)•OS Regvested 8y1 J, T, Pass investments 7557 Rambler Road suite 1000 ProJecti Oallas, Ta, 7573r WOOdhill Apartments, Phase III LOc at l on: Oenten, Tx. Oeseriptiont Topographic survey Scope Of Lork to be Performed under this Author 124tIon: Profile and location of aPour ton ancos approainately 1,000 test ve sanitary sower. Jrh'9 ntS: BtllInq In format Ion I 'Work to be performed in accordance with Schedule of Hourly Rates, ef111ng Polley an, Liability Limitation as Indicated en reyersa ,Ide of this sheet as fol)ows: Time and Materials t2 Contraet Amount 1 a Nouriy Rates with a20.e0 Estimated Budget S Other (Specify) S C xouely Rates .4e! To E.tCeed S this at.'thorization will COnstitute the basis of an agreement betw4en the Client and the Engineer for the services and compensation arrangement indicated herein, and must to signed by Client and returned to Llchliter/Jameson 1, Associates Int. prior to comencing the Aork. If, at the Client's specific request, 00" Is cOrnnenced upon Verbal authort. zatlon, In advance of receipt of this eaeeuted agreement, such wort will be Considered t o have been performed In accordance with the, terms and conditions herein stated, If this withinutenf(10)idays from thecdate siridentreturned to becstoppandsClient swill a be sbilTnt. for time spent to that date, led i AGAEEO TO AT OALLA§, TEXAS L'ICHLj.1' d IES>? 4 CIAT£S, IA;, r BY: /R i/ FOR; By. CAW OTEy~ SEE SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES e111 IN0 POLICIES ANO LIABILITY LIMITATIONS rN 4EVERSE SIDE MINLR'F'B (CX,MT1' MTM) PUBLIC U71LMM HOARD MET 40 8-15-84 Page 2 3. (Continued) Cox*e wants the developer to owpare the cost of a new water line vs, drilling a well. Boyd wants to know what are Vacation Village's resources. coo mes made a motion to postpone this item until the next meeting. At that time discussion will continue about establishing a policy regarding systems outside the City. Seconded by Boyd, 5 ayes, motion carried. i 4. OQWI DER PROP0M A"JORIZATION TO PMFORM PROFFSSI2U SERVICES FOR DESIGN OF APPRQXIMAZ Y 7000' SANITARY SEWFR LINE IN CONIMCTION P os P TY S MM TO pEgLk it7W LM TWIN OLnTALL INTF'RCE~'IORS . David Ham presented this item indicating the line tiA ll alleviate over- loading on other City lines. The John Pass representative said they will pay their share of the cost. (bomes suggested the developer should bear the cost. 3 7hrn►1)son indicated there is a need for a policy regarding oversizing, assigning costs, etc. Herring made a notion to accept the proposal, seconded by Thompson, 4 ayes, 1 ney, motion carried. Coomes on record as a nay. 5. C X$IM A( 2Er J'I' C SANITARY SEWER r'RO RATA PARTICIPATION FOR H99MYX CREFX 'LEMQ:TED AND THE CITY OF 7FNPON 70 ')MV _F A 61 ACRE MOBILE HOW PARK ON SW M TEASLEX LANE" (Holiaan revelos Mt} . David Ham presented this item indicating that installation would be at the developer's expense. The agreement would return $112,500 to Holigan DavelopmP.nt, Tnc. over a period of 20 years for any offsite property owners that tie onto the line. After ^ brief discussion Boyd made a motion to accept because the project was previously considered and accepted, seconded by Herring, 5 ayes, no naves, motion carried. 6. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF QMIZW ACCT FOR LOOP 288 PLAZA JOINT M M David Ham presented this item stating the need for an oversize line to match a line in the capital improvement plan. Oversizing the line from 8" to 2011 will cost the City $21,000 and will result in a project cost savings of $19,000 for the City. The motion to accept was made by Herring, seconded by Thomson, 4 ayes, 1 abstention (Coomes), no naves, motion carried. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM September 4, 1984 SUBJECT= Consider agreement for sanitary pro rata participation for Hickory Creek Limited and the City of Denton to serve a 61-acre mobile home park on South Teasley Lane, SUMMARYt The Holigan Development Inc, has been given approval for a mobile home park with 380 trailer units on South Teasley Lane adjacent to old Alton Church on F.M. 2181 wh.'c.h is Teasley Lane extension (see attached map). The Holigan Development Inc, was given approval for water and sanitary service from the City of Denton for this development on December 14, 1983. Construction of the 15" sanitary sewerline is almost complete and will consist of 5,350 feet at. an off.site cost of $133,750. The attached agreement will return $112,350 to Holigan Development Inc, over a period of 2O years for any offsite property owneres tying on to this sewerline. The formula for reimbursement will be as stated in Code of Ordinances 83-70, FISCAL SUMMARYt All installations have been at developer's expense. ACTION REQUIREDt Recommend approval of subject request for sewer pro rnta participation agreement between Hickory Creek Limited and City of Denton, RECOMMENDATION, The utility staff and Public Utility Board recommend approval of the Holigan Development Inc, request for pro rata participation agreement on the 15" sewerline which serves their development, /Reespeyct~fyujlly, / obert S. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Letter of request dated 11-21-83 EXHIBIT II Location map EXHIBIT III Construction Contract between 1loligan Dev. Inc, as contractor and Hickory Creek Limited as owner EXHIBIT IV Pro rata participation agreement between Hickory Creek Limited as owner and City of Denton EXHIBIT V Minutes of Public Utility Board Meeting August 15, 1984 SLACK YVTLL & ASSOCIATES, INC, U*nmmin6 Swvoyin` • Planning November 21, 1983 Ref. No. 101-007-201 Mr, David Ham t Assistant Director , City of Denton - Municipal Building Denton, TX 76201 Re: 61 Acre Mobile Home Development, F11 2181 Dear Mr, Ham: Blackwell & Associates, Inc„ designated as the consulting engineers for our client, is submitting a formal request to the Utility Depar,ment for extension of utility service to a 61 acre site along r",M, 2181, The land would be developed as a private mobile home aark with approximately 380 units.. -We are designing the park based on threc persons per unit. Average water demand is estimated at 100 gpcd and daily sewage flow is estimated at 75 gpcd, Enclosed is a preliminary street plan and mao locating the property. Ir you require any additional information, don't hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, BLACK14ELL & ASSOCIAT S, INC. R. C. Hill, P.E. Project Director RCH/ 1 wm Enclosure 4 i 1 V r,~«r~ft~' , •i, G~ c 'tl' I'- a ~ Ig4f r I ~ S 1 ' ~rrT' 6191 ~ ~~S '.I + , , _ 1 I lid i ; 1 W I Y °e S , y 'a , ~ V (o Iradpli~ 1 , ~ I .4 ~ ~ i I I I ~ QdIA~.~ ~ V ~ ~•li ~ ! vu tr 1R 4 0 4 1 t ' l qq 'J n f 9 PAYI 1 I 1 t' ~yi 114(3'.: t. ~ , I 1 M~ ~ ~ avs , } =L I I p TtJnf Rbfk 1'~\ H,•y', It~~,' i .h0y ff il-\~~h' i t ~ ~ { j' VVVV Y t 11 I ! 1 I I f 1 'FIT ~ I ~ SuoslJ n l~ ~ r l ~~11 111 h 1 i PDT EI I i fl i i 69 1 yl r>I r~ o p f , l i ~ ! Q _ I i, ir~ ,.,~!r ! e~ t ~ Aieo 004 v 1ro r° hrt ~W 4 1yiM~ b i / '1 'A i t W tit(: ets.~t < I I. 1 11 ~IjE ° ' p y, ^ W ...111 f~ ec\ aid ! `s }I' a ,i m 3 n T 161, I' a' ~ Ga,7a. Li1d 'Efal Heseruolr~• S~~ sso~, r'I i" })f, ! 120(M rEEI q) 1 8 r.. "07'30' pQo PA'Illi lye S Aril ~~1,vAa2 Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey / APPill 5 ~ 3 0 F'T ~ I Control by USGS and USC&GS ~MI+ tG:O 0 raphy from aeoat photographs by photogrammetric methods Nl Fes- r I photographs taken 1957 Field check 1960 E i 142 M1L9 Polyconic projection 1927 North American datum 1'04, 10,000-loot grid based on Texas coordinate system, 19 MILS north central tone 1000 meter Univelsai Transverse Mercator grid ticks, tone 11, shown in blue UrM GRID AND 1911 MAGNETIC NORTH Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines DECLINATION AT CENTER Of SHEET where enerall visible on aerial photographs THIS ~~:WERL(N~ PRO RATA ACREF. Eta THE STATE: or TKRAS 3 KNOW ALL NO dY THESE PRESEN N: :1tT J! DEti ICN ) THAT THIS AWE{ENT is made this day of . 1984 5! and between the tit, if Denton, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Osst-on and the State of Texas, hereinafter referred to is "City" and Harold 3cli;an. hereinaiter referred to as Qwnar". W ITHESSETHI THUGS. Owner will install a sever line from the City of Doriton't Hickory Creek Lift Station existing lower line ipproximataly 3.350 feet to ~hroer'a development on the north We of F4 2191 Slate Highvayi and O'HEAEAS, in War to serve this development with sewer servlces, Xntr will be cequirad to pay the cost of 5,350 feat of sever line in the a... ;.faits of Denton and wiil extend such saver Line is described above pursuant t tie provisions in effect on the date of this Agreement of the Denton )eVd: ^.ont Code Appendix A. to the Code of urdirnansus at the City of Denton, Tavii, ss heretofore amondedi and 'HA EREIS, the Owner deairen to receive reimbursement for such :'i1 .naar the provisions of ;aid Denton Development Code of the Clty of Denton. :zssa; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual ::Tenants and agreemdnts hereinafter provided, the parties hereto agree is i0 ion : L. That for and in consideration of the construction of such sewer extension for the benefit of later and ho City, the City agrees to reimburse >.-.er not to exceed his cost of construction only of such main extension the astie.at43 soot of $112,350 (5,350' x $21 per foot) under the provisions in We:: o the Jiro of this Canton Developent Code Agreement of the City of Denton. Ia..is, as heretofore amended with the fol Loving iinitatlonsl A. Reimbursement costs will be verified be the olrector of Yci.t;:es or his iesignea based on actual costa o, offsita sewer line c,., struction is presented by the Owners. 8, After the oxpiratloa of twenty (20) years from this data of toe completion of the sower gain extension, which will be ccopleted about 3 1984, no further reimbursement ahai. it made to Oitne C. The reinhursemeot ehail not appiy to gain extensions aonsttuZ ted by the City of Denton or under its d.rectiens from any main c:-,strvction under the terns of this Agreement. D. Reimbursement payments shalt he node to the Owner or their sasigns if written, and co no other personisi. i to the reinbureemsnt aforesaid shall be payabts only from funaA rseeived by the City pursuant to said Denton Oovelopment tats. P, There shall be a maximum of twenty (20) years as the perlrl • of allgibility wherein the on;anal installer of the matn aa* request reimbursement of pro rata oaymenti under this Agraa•am,t. Thu par t od of elie.b (S Ety shA ll tegln ts toe dato st :1"'4 Inspection ,and acceptance of the extension by the City, 0. All pro rata toss indurred undet the provisions of the Ica::i Development Code Ahail be paid directly to the City and tae City shall transfer amvunts due to owner within thirty ?i days of receipt li. That for and in consideration of the dgraements to be perfome: iy the City as atoresatd, Owner hereby transfers to the City all of to titls and interast in and to the main extension described above, aad any c,u all easamenrs And right of way agreements sacurea by then for the pure:-Ie nt Locating said main oxtetutone. 'dlittESSETH the hands of the Parties aeroto an tho fay and ;:ear :.rat aAova wrltten, Harold I(ollgan (Cvnar) 8YI '4", City of Denton, Toxas By: . Richard 0. Stewart, 9as-t• drTESTt City of Denton, raxas APPROVED X15 tO LECAL FOP-11: CON5[RUCTIOIN C_ONUCi THB STAU OF TEXAS I COUNTY OF DALLAS I This agroement fs made. it 1720 Stommons Freeway, Suite 203, louth rower, City of Dallas. Oounty of Dallas, State of Tosas, between Harold Hollgan, hereinafter called "Owner" and Hvllgan Development, Inc„ hora• inditer tailed "Contractor" sa followst I. Dastrtpcton of Work the Contractor shall perform the following described ,ork. The sanitary sever tine shall be constructed of 0-inch polyvinyl chlorldo IpVC' Ptpo meeting ASTH Spoc It is at i on 030745 DR 35, Joints shall be teetod In sraoraance Ylth AS I'M 03212, 9anhoIts shall have sealed covers Shore shall be a Do-f ott temporary ooust rutsI h wasement vrd tJ,. No :revs far gor than inches In liameter shall be Jaaagad or ramoved. All mater Wi and <anstrueilun motho Js aorta k W-4 to this sanfcar7 sever line shall conform to the standard specifi:ations far public works construction prepared Sy North Contact Tesaa 0uncil of !lovornments unlu's noted otherwfsa. TI. Agreed Payient to )cntucc)r Owner agrees to pay Contractor for the vork described, the Contract i= is Jne Hundred Thirty-Thruo Thousand Soven 4unir3l , Fifty and No/100 Dollars I$ 1)3,750.00). IN 'd ITNESS e'HEREOF, the Parties have made and u.¢ututod :hiv the 13th Jay of ;uly, 199+. Harold Hollgan ilollaon Davelopment, Owner Contractor 3v: Harold Holigan 3vt ohn W. Amlorsan Preitdent Business Addremst dusinuss Addrssat 2720 Stamens Freeway, Su:ta 20) 2720 Stammons Freavay, Sm :a 20) South Tower Dallas, r8 '5207 South Tower Dallas, TS 'S;'?7 t ATTACM01 TD CONTRACT 66TffR6N HARO NOI,LCAH. JtNBR DE V`79 IIJ4IOA;7 D¢YTLOP4RNL INC., coNTR1CTOR Hickory Creek ut wo sanitary never line ma}or materldle regalred+ IS" PVC pipe meting AST!f Speelftratian D3038-M33 SMO Not Cant-in-Place concrete .nunholee 14 I • NtIN<7!'ES (CONTINUED) PL1MIC UTYLITIES BOARD MEE'iM 8-1584 Page 2 3. (Continued) C=rm wants the developer to compare the cost of a new water line vs. drilling a well, Boyd wants to know wtkit are Vacation Village's resources, Comes made a motion to postpone this item until the next meeting, At that time discussion will continue about establishing a policy regarding systems outside the city. Seconded by Boyd, 5 ayes, motion •-arried. 4. q NSI2M PRO nM AC1If10RI7,ATI-CN TO PMM- M PROMSSIONAL S M-MICES F~7 DF4'ICN OF APP&}CI S=T Y_ 7Q00_^ SANITARY $UM LINE IN CMUNCTION WTV JOHN PASS INVFMMMM FF M PROPERTY ON DLL&S DRIVE T2 PK2W MM02~r~U;QW LM TWIN 0MIALL INTERCF.P'IURS. David Ham presented this item indicating the line will alleviate over- loading on other City lines. The Jots Pass representative said they will pay their share of the cast. Comes suggested the developer should bear the coat. Thompson indicated there is a need for a policy regarding oversizing, assigning costs, etc. Herring made a notion to accept the proposal, seconded by Thompson, 4 ayes, 1 nay, motion carried. Coomes on record as a nay. 5. CONSIDER AQ2EF TP KR SANITARY SEWER PRO RATA PARTICIPATION FOR HICKORY CREAK LJMM AND THE CITY OF DM" TO SF RVF A 61 F.CRE MOBILE HONE PARK ON SOUTH MMLEY LANE. (Holigan Development). David Ham presented this item indicating that installation would be at the developer's expense. The agreement would return $112,500 to Holigan Development, Inc, over a period of 20 years for any offsite property owners that tie onto the line. After a brief discussion Boyd made a motion to accept because the project was previously considered and accepted, seconded by Herring, 5 ayes, no nayes, motion carried. 6. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF LA IZING AGREEMENT FOR LOOP 288 PLAZA JOINT VEWM David Ham presented this item stating the need for an oversize line to match a line in the capital improvement plan. oversizing the line from 8" to 20" will cost the City $21,000 and will result in a project cost savings of $19,000 for the City. The motion to accept was made by Herring, seconded by Tbmpson, 4 ayev, 1 abstention (Cocmes), no nayes, motion carried. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM September 41 1984 SUBJECT: Consider approval of overaizing agreement for Loop 288 Plaza Joint Venture. SUMMARYt The Utility Department in conjunction with the City Enginoer is in. the design stage for construction of a major transmission water',ne from the water treatment plant east to Loop 288 and thon north co , McKinnry Stre6t and subsequently to University Drive (Highway 1`;0) This major transmission waterline will greatly improve the water pressure and flow capabilities of our water distribution system ic, that water will be more readily available in the northeast and north portions of the City allowing for greater fire flow capabilities, Loop 288 Plaza Joint Venture is constructing a business center on the southwest corner of Audra Lane and Loop 288. Across the north/south middle of their property is a Brazos Electric utility easement, The location of this new transmission waterline will b•e along this Brazos utility easement in order to save money in the total cost of this project, The utility department staff asked Field, Edwards, and Associates, engineers for Loop 288 Plaza Joirs Venture, to service their property with water in the location of this Brazos Electric easement and to entertain the agreement of overaizing from their 8" requirement to the 20" requirement requested by the utility staff. This action would save the City the cost of approximately 926 feet of the 8" equivalent size water pipe and only cost the City the overaizing of this transmission main from an 8" pipe up to a 20" water pipe, FISCAL SUMMARY: All. costs and line lengths are estimatest Waterlinot 926 feet @ $45/ft for 20" size d $41,6 ?0 Developer: 926 feet @ $21.50/ft for 8" size - $19'9Q9 Denton: 926 feet @ $45/ft - $21,50/ft for 8" to 20" size 21,761 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Water bond funds Account fl 623-008-0461-9114 This project is a portion of the 1984-85 Capital Improvements Program for construction of a 20/20" water transmission line frees the water plant to University Drive, Funds are available for funding this overaizing. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM page 2 September 41 1984 ACTION REQUIRRDi Approve or disapprove City of Dentan's participation in oversize of thid major water transmission line, RECOMMENDATIONi The Utility Department staff and Public Utility Board recommend approval of this oversize transmission main to 20" in the approximate amount of $21,761, Respectfully$ Robert E. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I location map of Loop 288 Plaza Joint Venture development EXHIBIT II Map of Hogan and Rasor master distribution study EXHIBIT III oversize agreement for water transmission main EXHIBIT IV Minutes of Public Utility Board Meeting of August 15, 1984 I~ °ce_-...-- - - - - _ ._._....___J M►3 3 89*5 41 • lot 4. 71,11' I 1 I I t I I I I j t <WYI OAIA t•s A•3•14' t4" j .410 161W r f R LOT 2 6+319.93 LOT S S S i, /1.:t cn.s3~10'so'w I I >e (i. t44 AC.) I r { ,2 0 ~r cJ.erF,4 I r s o c p N rg,,NSM~fs~.~ 1 I! Al^f /A) -r (11.356 AC• I I iix I I J I I J k FAULTIFI~MII,Y ~ ~ j a r 0MMERCIAI. E ~ w I I y - M N 3 I L1 V1 y Vo ~ i I I ~ , J I I I V 11'_7 ~ 71+'x.____- ~ _ 1 r. .i{~ ~ _ . CHARLESTON.-_._--9AIVE•- H 9 1 0 f I'"c s i e L o cK o rwo r LL2Q9ac1 LOT ! i S s Aa11rt s,A.AA~ t ++e9.13'H s93a ~7.a9>rarY"J ISU6' 403"''~Y- O r•~rIN ~ 0N.1 LOT 2 MU L T I F'4 FA I l,Y )X llrl- i r I V<~UO~.M~ 1 r199•Il'w 499.06' Lf1 ~y VICIMI NIYIr \Ir •s + tool, Too" lip WAT49 *1.A--J 7 s , acp n s, r~ •r 5 Y Y . i. 1 ,3}~~ \ r n Y Q I\~ t t rf - r LI~ 5 1♦ 1 y ' 9 1 rfit '7 4 I, \ r ( »r,»»NNW. ;-y r„ \ ' /'"N;; P,eer7Bc7' (4",- tiff qj, ti y,' ,r~ rl 'W'Ww..rMr•rNrNNNN WN♦.rMNM♦MNHMMSMr ~ ~ ~ ~1 1 1J ~ \'i \ 1 . I I IJ Y- C~ rNr .3rN ` w , t ' N .wl rW«♦r 5. W♦W»~.NN...1 1; «w«.A ~I . ' S 1 rr 711, 1 s X51 `-11L*1 _ v, 1 P. 1 i ~ pIN.MM1NNr.W ♦w«.N~N...w«ww'/ :ilk i •J 1«~„ ' k r 1 Y T -2, - 1. 1 11 4 nl .,In 1 L - 1 111 11'~ +I• r e 1. yr , 5 ♦oe ' rf rl. 1 L t -';7 N•»wN«rN«w••NNNwNN J r M'•~» ~ LII lv' .I t~11 - 11' 1 - i ` r \ r l NYr♦.rlWrNw NNUn Tt~ ~I NMN.«W....l«.rr.rr...... r. rr♦r........N.r 'r N.....,.,,,,NN ♦ _ ` EsNe iT b' CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS ALTERNATE NO 3 COMPUTER INDEX MAP CT ~%~2:\ c , ~1'..a; cu'Pn rr5rcl,n N, .R. u.vw NnS~..+ H059AN o RASORr 1,... U p,vl V'.a.l 4:.nr r ~ WATERLINE OVERSIZE P6WCjPATIUN AOREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS S KNOW ALI, MEN $Y THESE PRESENTS! COUNTY OF DENTON S That Whereas, Loop 288 Plaza Joint Venture, 111c ,l 10000 I.H. In W, Suite 41E, San Antonio, Texas 782361 Telephone Number (512) 690-00001 is the Developer of certain property shown un the attached map, which map is incorporated herein as is set forth in full, and further described as property on Loop 288 and Audra Lane, and Developer desires to serve such property with 926 teet of onsite waterline taeilitiesr and WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires that such onsite waterline facilities be oversized and the City of Denton will participate In the additional cost of tr,e oversized facilities for approximately 926 feet, pursuant to the provisions of the Denton Development Cude, Appendix A, to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas) NOW1 THEREFORE, this Agreement, made this day of , 1984, by and between LOOP 288 PLAZA JOINT VENTURE, an') the CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, a Home Rule Municipal Corporation of the State of Texas, hereinafter called "City'! WITNESSETH; 1, The Developer will install, by contract or otherwise, a 20" waterline and appurtenances to serve the property described on the attached map in accordance with all City of Denton ordinances, rules, regulations, policies and prucedures. The said facilities shall be located as shown on the attached map which is made a part hereof for all intents and purposes. The engineering design and easement purchases will be paid by the Developer. 2. The City of Denton estimated cost of oversiZing said facilities is $21,761 (926' x $45-$21.50) for construction only, Upor completion of construction and acceptance by the City of said facilities, the actual cost of the City's oversize partici- pation In said facilities shall be determined and certified to by WATERLINE OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/LOOP 288 JOINT VENTURE, INC./PAGE 1 the Direotor of Utilities or his designee, and his oertlticate setting out the City'e cost of said facilities shall be attached hereto and made a part h6fe0f, 3. The City shall pay for Its share of the facilities within thirty (30) days from the date of acceptance of the facilitiws, or under such terms and conditions that are mutually aecuptso:a to the parties. 4. Title to said facilities is hereby anu shall at all times be vested in the City, 5. The Developer shall ana does hereby agree to indeanif'. and hold harmless the city from any and all damages, loss or llaotiity of any kind whatsoever, Uy reason of injury to property or :bird person occasioned by any act or ommission, neglect or wrong-soing of Developer, its officers, agents, employees, invitees, con- tractors or other persons with regard t) the performance of this contract and Developer will, at their own cost and expense, defend and protect against any and all such claims and deman(ar, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed by said parties this the day of , 1984, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYO.4. ATTEST; CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: .1 LOOP 288 PLAZA JOINT VENTURE, INC. BY: WATERLINE OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT/LOOP 288 JOINT VENTURE, INC./PAGE 2 I i 1 I t 1 I i ~ ' <wrf WfA ~ . i '~~~i+t~i r k e~3•le' F • (w. ir,10Ww i'See9so, LOT I 3 LOT 2 +K ft t~s99s I ~ I SI 9f' e O C A' ONE T,e NS y/ss~•rJ 11 (ti.SSfr eC,1 P?rE F !ritj,T:;r Am ILy i O U r a pr4'v E'R M 1n y ` p Yl s x ~ _ .CNONIESiON------9RIVE I I ff'Itt IrfO f l qt n 1^I `f ^ ~ 1 I ~,CCi ~p I LOCK i B y ~ TWO ~ f ? L.409 AL) LOT I S s efr ~t a 7ree I , I , It . TP) Na3'~4'W secs 5 0' LOT 2 MULTIF4MiL) 1 3 Ills t,rt-r ~ It I ' 1 rI W,. Yr ` i as N 896I3'W 49806' is nC,ritr r~r ,Goats X 88 ^4,4Z.I JertJ~' {~E♦JltJRE Fn_~: J IM{s'1' Iq~RR, mlia WAr4X i t Li 714. 4 qn _ Jw t~ t ~ , , ~ ~ " ~~.wer 2It 41 wr ✓rlywF r =t Ow '1' ' N~JwIJJ «.NI..NJNJNN~ , .Mw.~~ 7; J e 1. i -ti - 1 a ?1L' ~ p :y~~`' Y 2' i is - . . - R ~ 1 "'"J+rrw.w..«ii«.«NwwJ NN«JJwu«., .,w...'.~«I.ww•ri~r.r.+w' CITY OF DENTON..TEXAS ALTERNATE ,W 3 COMPUTER nWEY MAP w 9e r~p ra.~ HOOAN • RA®OP, Ewa KM M (OCkIP MM) PUBLIC UMLITIES BOM MMMM B-15-84 Page 2 3, (Continued) coomes wants the developer to cxmrpare the cost of a new water line vs, drilling a well. Boyd wants to know what are Vacation Village's resources, Coomes made a motion to postpone this item until the next meetinq. At that time discussion will continue about establishing a policy regarding systems outside the City, seconded by Boyd, 5 ayes, motion carried, 4. ONSIM PROPO= AUMMg SON To PMRM PROFESSIONAI, SERVICES FOR pMg:V OF APPROQJAM 7000' SPRY SW M LIME IN 911ANCCION WITH JOHN PASS INVEST FROM PROPMV ON DALLAS DRIVE TO PECAN Y~OD I&M T%7N OVPFALL nM-RCEPOMRS. David Ham presented this item indicating the line will alleviate over- loading on other City lines. It* John Pass representative said they will pay their snare of the cost. Coames suggested the developer should bear the cost. Thcmpson indicated there is a need for a policy regarding oversizinn, assigning costs, etc, Herring made a motion to accept the proposal, seconded by Thompson, 4 ayes, 1 nay, motion carried. Coomes on record as a nay. 5, MNSIDER ACpEFRgTJT FOR SANITARY SL; M PFo RATA PARTICIPATION FOR HICKORY MM LIMITED AND THE CITY Or DWrO 70 SFF2VF A 61 _ACRE MOBILE HOME PARK ON SOUTH TEASLEY LANE. (Holigan Development), David Ham presented this item indicating that installation would be at the developers expense. The agreement would return $112,500 to Holigan Development, Tnc. over a period of 20 years for any off.site property owners that tie onto the line. After a brief discussion Boyd made a motion to accept because the project was previously considered and accepted, seconded by Herring, 5 ayes, no nayes, motion carried, 6. 00%IDER APPROVAL OF OVERSIzlM AG~LI FOR_LL)Op 288 pLAZA kTOTNT VENTURE, David Ham presented this item stating the need for an oversize line to match a line in the capital improvement plan. Oversizing the line from 8" to 20" will cost the City $21,000 and will result in a project cost savings of $19,000 for the city. The motion to accept was made by Herring, seconded by Thompson, 4 ayes, 1 abstention (C,oomes), no nayes, motion carried. AGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL September 40 1984 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday September 41 1984, at 5:30 p,m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered; 5:30 P.M. 1. Discussion on funding of Flow Hospital, 2. Discussion of a proposed 112.7 acre mobile home subdivision in the extra territorial jurisdiction (approximately 9700 feet east of Loop 288 on Highway ~Jlb) for the purpose of determining whether or not to begin the annexation process. J. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252.17 V.A, r.S, . C. Personnel Under Sec, Z (g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on ruesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 1, 1984; Regular Meeting of May 22, 1934; Regular Meeting of June 5, 1984; Special Called Meeting of June 8, 1984; and the Regular Meeting of June 19, 1984. 2. Consent Agenda: Eacn of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda auttioriaes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff . recommendations. City of Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 1984 Page Two A, Bids and Purchase Orders; 1. Bid N 931$ - Bentonite slurry cutoff wall 2, Bid # 9318 Traffic poles, signal lights, etc. 3. Bid 0 9319 - deter maintenance 4. Bid li 9320 - Hydraulic auger S. Bid # 9321 - Padlocks 6, Bid k 9322 - Infrared viewer 7, laid Y 9324 - Vacuum pump 8, Bid # 9325 - Suft drinks and vending machines 9. Bid # 9316 - Sale of transformer - damaged in fire 10. Bid 0 9327 - 't'ransformer ratiometer 11. Bid N 9329 - Janitorial services 12, Bid H 9331 - Utility poles 13, Purchase Order N 63913 to General Electric Company, Apparatus Service Division in the amount of $13,111,63, 14, Purchase Order # 64685 to Denton Electric Shop, Inc. in the amount of $3,583,26, 15, Purchase Order # 64726 to Newman Engineering Equipment, Inc. in the amount of 33,512.17. 16, Purchase Order # 64753 to ONEAC Corporation in the amount of $4,143,00, B. Contracts; 1. Consider approval of a contract with Padgett-Thompson for presentation of seminar regarding the legal aspects of hiring and firing, seminar to be given to all City supervisory personnel. Cost will be approximately $6,000 depending upon number of participants. City ox Denton city council Agenda aepteOer 4, 1984 Page Three 0 C, Plats and Replats i 1. Consider approval of the final replat of lot 29, Section XI, of the Solar Way Addition, (Tile Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval . ) 2 Consider approval of the preliminary sand final replat of the Krause Addition. Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Frame Street Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ) 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Jay-Mar Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ) s. Consider approval of the preliminary replat of the Westridge Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. ) 6. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of block 1 of the Woodcreek Addition. (Toe . Planning and Zoning Commission recominenJs approval,) 7. Consider aapproval of a site plan for unit 2, block 2, of the Falimeadow Addi t ion (PD-8). (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 8. Denton BrReapproval tirement of Cethe nter final replat of CTthe he Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 3. Appearance by representatives of Young People in Action to express appreciation to the City Council 'sor their support, 4. Public Hearings; A. Z-1072. This is :he petition of Curtis D. Hodgson, representing RWGP, Inc. , requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 66.5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Paige Rd. and Swislier Rd. If approved, the planned development w ill permit a 413 lot manufactured housing subdivision, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council AgeAda* September 4, 1984 Page Four 1, Adoption of an ordinance approving a Chane in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 66,5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Par e Road and Swisher Road. B. Z-1674. This is the petition of Jo Storer requesting an amendment to planned development (PD-6) on a $8,2 acre tract located on the south side of Colorado Boulevard approximately 11500 feet northwest of Loop 288, If approved, the PD amendment will permit the following land uses; Single family detached - 22 lots on 3,8 acres (typical lot size 1201x451) Single family detached - 106 lots on 34.1 acres (typical lot size 120'x801) Cluster Housing - 215 units on 18 acres (12 units per acre) Two family - 16 units on 2.3 acres (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) • C. 2-1682. This is the petition of Jo Storer requesting a change in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and SF-16) zoning classifications to the planned development (PD) classification on a 83.2 acre tract located on the east and west sides of Lillian Miller Parkway (Ridgaway Drive) beginning approximately 1,000 feet south of Interstate Highway 351;, if approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses; 38.2 acres of single family-(SF-10) detached land use (105 lots with a density of 2.7 units per acre) 18.0 acres of single family ( F-16) detached land use (32 lots with a density of 1,8 units per acre) 17.6 acres of single family detached land use (106 units with a density of 6 units per acre) 9,4 acres of single family attached land use (40 units with a density of 4.3 units per acre) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the SF-10 and SF-16 classification to the Planned Development i:ity of Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 1984 Page Five (PU) classification on a 83.4 acre tract located on the east and west sides of Lillian Hiller Parkway beginning approximately 1000 feet south of 1.356. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) D, Public hearing regarding the use of Federal Revenue funds for the fiscal year 1984.85, E. Public hearing on the fiscal year 1984-85 budget. 5, Ordinances,, A, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a a change in zoning from planned development (PD-19) and single family (SF-10) to a revised planned development classification on 161,7 acres beginning at the intersection of Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller Parkway tKidgeway Drive), (Z-1660). B, Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Appendix A to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, known and cited as the Denton Development Code, by amending Article III, Chapter IV, Article 4.16, Paragraph (A) relating to lot size, width and depth requirements for proposed subdivisions and declaring an effective date. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance and service plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 31.335 acres of land located on the east side of FM 2164 (North Locust Street) and west of the Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park (A-5) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) D. Consider adoption of an ordinance adopting the 1982 Uniform Fire Code and Amendments; to provide for fire safety inspections of buildings, fire extinguishing, sprinkler and standpipe systems, and flammable storage facilities; providing for inspection and permit fees and repealing all ordinances in conflict, E. Consider an ordinance abandoning an easement, Greater Denton Arts Council, et al tract, city of Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 1984 page Six . 6, Resolutions; A, consider a Business ofantoresolution Programblforingthe 'Minority Denton Municipal Airport, (The Airport Advisory Hoard will meet on August 31.) B. consider the aDentonutDevelopmentdoGuide. 1984 (The {'The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 7. Consider approval of tentative award of Bid N 9238 for improvements at the Denton 1-Sunicipal Airport, (The Airport Advisory board will meet on August 31,) 8, Consider taking a record vote on the proposed tax increase for fiscal year 1984.85, 9, Consider removing zoning case Z-1677, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change 10, in zoning from the single family (SP-7) and agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 52 acre tract (The c.orner ULattimore tilities SBoard l ocated at the northwest and and Audra Lane, recommends approval.) 11. Consider approval of proposed authorization to perform professional services for design of approximately 7000' sanitary sewerline in conjunction Dwivh~ to nPecan investments from property or Dal las creek/Woodrow Lane twin outfall interceptors, (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval,) 12. Consider approval of an agreement for anitand the rata participation for Hickory Creek Limited City of Denton to serve a 61 acre mobile home park on South Teasley Lane. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) Consider approval of an oversizing agreement for Loop 13, (The Public Utilities Board 2g8 Plaza .Ioinure, recommends approval.) 14, Official Action on Executive Session Items; A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C, Personnel D. Board Appointments City of Denton City Council Agenda September 4, 1984 Page Seven 15. Now Business; This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas, C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1984 at <<<;.~' o'clock r (a. M, } m. } 1 CITY SECRETARY 1117iC CirYof DENTCN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200 Tot The Mayor avid Members of the City Council FROMI Dill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works DATEt August 31, 1984 SUBJECTt BID 09328 - AIRPORT IMPROVFMENTS PROJECT The Airport Advisory Board met on Friday, August 31, 1984, to discuss the bids for the Airport Improvements Project. The Board voted to recommend to the City Council that the bid be tentatively awarded to low bidder, Atkins Brothers Equipment Company, in the amount of $480,127.80. The Airport Advisory Board also desired that the staff and Council take note of the discrepancies in line item bid amounts on the bidders tab sheets and take a hard line against any change orders, Bill Angelo BA/sc Attachment 1 ' BID SUMMARY TOTAL BID PRICE IN WORDS~%D;~2 1~13ko2Eb F.It,►k 'ft~R>ile.: au-*"A i o IA.RS /hiA at ts In the event of the award of a contract to the undersigned, the undersigned will furnish a performance bond and a payment. bond for the full amount of the contract, to secure proper compliance with the terms and provisions of the contract, to insure and guarantee the work until final completion and acceptance, and to guarantee payment for all lawful claims for labor performed and materials furnished in the fulfillment of the contract. It is understood that the work proposed to be done shall be accepted, when fully completed and finished in accordance with the plans and specifications, to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The undersigned certifies that the bid prices contained in this proposal have been carefully checked and are submitted as correct and final, Unit and lump-sum prices as shown for each item listed in this proposal, shall control over extensions. 1 , c0►0 itACTOK B Y 1' Street Address City an State Seal J .Authorization (If a corporation) Telephone BID 1 132b din TABULATION DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AIP1 3-48-0067-01-64 Item DQsorigtion Unit Bias uantltY Unit Prica Ext Total ZZ4Ckoo•e+ •151-t.1 Clearing i Grubbing LUMP H" xs t4i►.4o •152-4.1 Unclassified Excavation CY 11,472 2.4',5 •152-4.4 Drainage Excavation CY 0,810 3.00 L46 .44* oo •152-4.7 EmoanKment (Fill) CY 4#646 1.60 A.,f."-00 -155 8.1 Lime Treated Subgrade SY 21.544 t." y0.160t.vw 802 Lime TON 345 `f 41. A0 xSV,A►Vja•r+ 309.5.1 Crushed Aggregate base Course TOCY 5t925 N 2,830 ~i~,.6o g4,0oi.•+e ,401-6.1 Bituminous Surface Course ,602-501 Bituminous Prim' Coat GALLON 7,813 1,4-0 %0-9)40p," •620-5.1 ,runway 4 Taxiway Painting LUMP SUM ►rsoe.0o -625-5.1-;5) Coal Tar Pitch Emulsion SY i1, 544 .60 11,zlev.to -701-5.1 Pipe For Storm prams And, 80 hS O6 °O Culverts •751-5.1 Catcn basins t Inlets EA 1 •751-5.1 Structural Concrete-Headwalls EA 2 40va.oo -754 Concrete Ditches (HIP Rap) SY 425 Ac+"C' tC) ,L2S.m 108-5.1 Installation of Underground Cable LF 1,500 ~.fes ~nOo.o (Cable and 't'rench) X110-5.1 Installation of Underground $ CPO t4. &0,ao Elec Duct LF 56 2 Zooo. a Qc~bo.< -807 8' Wind Cone Assembly 858 RetrofJ.ective Taxiway Guidance c, Signs EA 2 EA 117 Go, oa 7ozo.t SC ITL14S-01 Airplane Tiedowns SC IT&145-r2 Airplane Refueling Anchors EA 22 70. 0o th 40 .c LUMP SUMS 1 4$oo•Q tNTLhANCB SOHO TOTAL a 2 quidated damages will be assessed at the rate of $200.00 per day. 0 Calendar days are allowed on pro3ect. 1 ~ l BID SU`tMARY TOTAL BID PRIG; IN S4ORDS FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE DOLLARS AND SIXTY CENTS. In the event of the award of a contract to the undersigned, the undersigned will furnish a performance bond and a payment bond for the full amount of the contract, to secure proper compliance with the terms and provisions of the contract, to insure and guarantee the work until final completion and acceptance, and to guarantee payment for all lawful claims for labor performed and materials furnished in the fulfillment of the contract. It is understood that the work proposed to be done shall be accepted, when fully completed and finished in accordance with the plans and specifications, to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The undersigned certifies that the bid prices contained In this proposal have been carefully checked and are submitted as correct and final. Unit and lump-sum prices as shot-in for each item listed in this proposal, shall control over extensions. CALVERT PAVING CORPORATION CONTRACTOR BY f y PRESIDENT P.O. BOX 268 Street Address DENTONe TEXAS &1, Citj and S,: ate Sea! Ij Authorization (If a Corporation) e lep hone %~1 387-6831 1 1 910 0 9328 pG 4 AID TABULATION DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AIPV 3-48-0067-01-84 Item Description Uni Bid Quantity Unit Price Ext Total P-151-4.1 Clearing i Grubbing LUMP SUM 400000000 P-152-4,1 Unclassified Excavation CY 11,472 5100 57,36000 P-152-4,4 Drainage Excavation CY 80810 5600 440050.00 P-152-4.7 Emoankment (Fill► P-155 8.1 Lime Treated Subgrade uY 4'646 2.00 90292.00 sY ~.l, 544 3.00 64o632,00 6.2 Lime 10N 345 75.00 25*875.00 P-209-5.1 Crushed Aggregate Was* Course CY 50925 24.00 14.2,206.00 P-401-6.1 Bituminous Surface Course TON 20830 P-602-5.1 Bituminous Prime Coat GALLON 7o813 35'00 99,050.00 P-620-541 Aunway i Taxiway Painting LUMP SUM 1.00 7,813,00 P-625-5.1-(5) Coal 'Tar Pitch Emulsion 1250.00 6,0 $Y 21j544 1,40 300*,1611.660 0-741-5.1 Pipe For Storm Drains And Culverts LF 84 100.00 0-751-5.1 Catcn Basins i Inlets EA l 8,000.00 U-752-5.1 structural Concrete-Headwalls EA 2 1000.00 1,000.00 0-754 Concrete Ditches (Rip kap) SY 425 1500.00 30600.00 L-108-5.1 Installation of Undergrouna Cable LEI 10500 10.00 7x650.00 (Cable and Trench) 10.00 15, 000.00 L-110-5.1 Installation of Underground Elec Duct LF 56 100.00 50600.00 L-807 8' wind Cone Assembly E\ 2 2000.00 40000.00 L-858 Retroflective Taxiway Guidance Signs Ei, 2 500.00 10000.00 :4ISC 1=4S-11 Airplane Tieaowns EA 117 50.00 5,850.00 MISC.1=4S-12 Airplane Refueling Anchors F-A 22 100.00 2,200.00 ;•tAINTLk4k14CE BOND LUMP SUM 1 500.00 500.00 TOTAL S75~e1R?_6~ Liquidated damages will be assessed at the rate of $200.00 per day. 120 Calendar days are allowed on project. 1 ~ 1 • 1 , BID SUMMARY TOTAL BID PRICE IN WORDS 6 U r7r Gl 7iC~R ~r ~~~x!: ti e~AC 1 t3.a:S ~t Id.., c In the event of the award of a contract to the undersigned, the undersigned will furnish a performance bond and a payment bond for the full amount of the contract, to secure proper compliance with the terms and provisions of the contract, to insure and guarantee the work until final completion and acceptance, and to guarantee payment for all lawful claims for labor performed and materials furnished in the fulfilLmenc of the contract, It is understood that the work proposed to be done shall be accepted, when fully completed and finished in accordance with the plans and specifications, to the satisfaction of the Engineer. The undersigned cerr_ifies that the bid prices contained in this proposal have been carefully checked and are submLtted as correct and final, Unit and lump-sum prices as shown for each item listed in this proposal, shaLl control over extensions. C ,TPA TOR EYE Street Address 1---i State ' Seal Authorizati,c,n (if a corpornticn') Telephone l ' . , 1 1 1 ~xD BID TABULATION DENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ATPO 3-48-0067-01-14 Item Description Unit aid ruantity Unit Price Ext Total P-151-4.1 Clearing i drubbing LUMP SUM 54QO,02) el"04w.'d P-'152-4.1 Unclassified Excavation CY 11,412 02~eve P-152-4.4 Drainage Excavation CY 80810 oU *O~ P-152-4.7 Embankment (Fill) CY 4, 646~~yyyf? P-155 8.1 Lime Treated Subgradu SY 21,544 j, 9C1 !fd b~: 8.2 Lime TON 345 $lr,0.0 P•209-5.1 Crushed Aggregate Base Course CY 50925 a s'c, P-401^6.1 Bituminous surface Course 'LON 2,830 $y.eo S"U p, P-602-5.1 Bituminous Prime Coat GALLON 7, 813 -60, 2»620-5.1 Runway & Taxiway Painting LUMP SUM 7J``b4 P-625-5.1-(5) Coal Tar Pitch Emulsion SY 210544 /+~Q 7217 D-701-5,1 Pipe For Storm Drains And Culverts Lc" a0 0-751-5.1 :etch Basins b inlets iA 1 $C,O,ba Z Bc60 0-752-5l1 Structural Concrete-headwalls EA Y ee)aa.o0 00.r . SY 425 22, b v ~szzo r7^754 Concrete Ditcn„.s (Rip Rap) L-108-5.1 installation of Undergrouna Cable L~' 3,200 Sty (Cable and Trench) L-110-5.1 installation of Underground Elec Duct IF 56 .7!~c EA 2 27t4L•,G& J~o co. L-807 8' Wind Cana Assembly L-858 RetrofleCtive 1'axi.way Guidance Signs E 2 /S~GD,oc c'ar'. 117 /7, S50, ~fiSC ITS+IS-=1 Airplane Tiedowna FA EA 22 o 7J ~0e bfLSC ITEMS--s2 Airplane Refueling Anchors LUMP SUM 1ucc,roEa• c• 24J+FNTENANCE BOND TOTAL n ¢'~'Si l~/'G L:quidat.~d damages will be assessed at the rata of $200.00 Per Gay. 120 Calan3ar plays are allowed on project. BID _ - 9s2a 8t D AIRPORT EXPANSION MARRIOTT CALVERT ATO NS OPEN 873078 BROTHERS PAVING BROTHERS ---?-Ln~' EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT tl CO. QTY. _ITEM D SCRI V NDOR VN D0,I EN-OR VN DOR E D R VENDOR VT, 1 AIRPORT EXPANSION 483,992.40 575,483.6 480,127.8 BID BOND YES YES YES THIS IS To CIPTIFY lhol Iho rnluolhsloyr~p' c appealing •n Ihlc ifllal•fllo •nd $#Iwo.n~ wilh C1T. Y~Cp.U_NCSL AGENDA PACKET ending wllh CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET CITY OF OENTON - rrccurolo rn,l eomplol• r.pr♦ducllonc •I lhe rocordo •I fCompclny and pcpl~).....~...---~ CITY SECRETARY .o► dolivor+d In lho rpuloc cSYrc• 61 >>uclnocc for phol"tophImof Ic lurthor c.rilAod Thal Ih~ rnlulppholpOrpphl{ proacc'c w!ro'ceoelpllch~ / i h mannot and on Alm which on"14 Wh}, nc~ulronnoMc cal Ihr Notlon~ Iurosu of Sl ►.r losmononl lnlcrophologrophic copy, ~.Shcs'.r'=- Rnaordra Coln~W3'_.. c....or.+«+ Itrvpl ItCMt10lOGb~A1 j Scat• PLACE ► ~tg-~li.~oi '7W1 n aillnolnn Y►rAe