HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-23-1984
C (TI CE NO A
10,8 ~.3- ~4
/^t"•Tmay.
CITY or. ~ O bVMn:r tL,
October 234 1964
Special Called Meeting Of the City of Denton City Council on
' Tuesday# October 234 1904, at 5:00 P.M. in the Couinoil Chambers
of tho,MuniaiPal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5;00 P'X.
11 COneidet reeoVinq zoning Case Z,1682 from the table.
2. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving 'a change
in Zoning frog the single family (SF-10 and SF-16)
Zoning classifications to the plannsd developm*nt (PD)
classification on an 63,2 aore tract located On the
east and west, sides of Lillian Miller Parkway
beginning approximately 14000 foot Routh of Interstate
Highway 351:. Z-1662
3, ftsouti,ve 8e481,on:
A. Legal Matters - Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.A,T.B.
8., Real Estate - Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.'r,8.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under sec. 2(q), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
C E E T I F Y C A T E
2 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin bo d at the City Hall of the City of Denton, 'Texas,
on the day of ' 1964 at o1clock
CxTY SECRETARY
I
1541C
I
rr-' r r i r•
j
CITY ► DXWTQW, A4 C 1 ory Ght1NC I L
October 13, 1946
Special called meeting of the City of Dentahen coCity uncil Council on
Tuesday, October 234 19660 at 5140 ?,mo
of the Nufticipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:.
5:00 p.m.
1. Consider removing zoning ease Z-1682 from the table.
2. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change
in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and SF-16)
zoning classifications to the planned de,,,elopment (PD)
Classification on an 83.2 aore ticaat located on the
east and west sides of Lillian. Killer parkway
beginning approximately 1.000 feet south of Interstate
Highway 369. Z-1682
3. n*outive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Arta 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Boo. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sea. 2(q), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(9), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of .SBA at o'clock
CITY gECRETARY
1561C
.1,` A'^'T"^"vmA~ ^1\~^'C"'irrtl: "'."R}'1!f` -ter TT+^-^•+^TA` 7.•~~~s~,AT^"1.RT Y+m'''~.''m m4
CITY I"'' Cll. MINu'1` S
SEPTlllMN 10 1906
Z-1612
C. The council held a public hearing on the petition
of Jo Storer requesting a change in zoning from the single
family (Sr-10 and sr-16) zoning classifications to the planned
development (Pb) 0.4 0itiaation on 4`83,2 acts tract located on
the east and west aides of Lillian Miller Parkway (Ridgeway
Drive) beginning approximately 1,OOQ feet south of Interstate
Highway 35!!, If approved, the planned development would poratt
the following land uses:
38.2 40r4s of Single family (8f-,10) detached.land use
(105 lots with a dent ty of 2.7 unite per aore)
18,0 Gores of single family (SIB-16) detaohed land use
(32 lots with a density of 1,8 units per more)
17,6 pores of single family detached land use
006 units with a density of 6 units per more)
9.4 mores of single famil~r attached lend use
(40 'units with a densftY of 6.3 units per acre)
The Mayor opened the public hearing;
Ks. Jo Storer, the petitioner, spoke in favor.
"Mayor,'. Members of the Council, I'm Jo Storer and I would like
to explain,tu You the kind of Zoning that We have arranged for
this yargeou,s' piece of land. I hope you have all been down
Lillian Miller Parkway. It's so pretty,'
"We have SF-16 at the top there (referring to the overhead
projection of the plan) that is going to have a cul-de-sac
street through it. It is going to be called The Fridge of
Southridge. We are going to have 25 lots,in'there in excess of
10000 square feet. Across the top over there we are going to
have another section that will back up to the existing lf,000
square 'lot lots in the ;existing Southridge.area. Below that,
We are going to 'do, some SPA-10. Along Ridgeway we pian two
single family separate individual houses to be on individual
lots but they will be attached With garages and gates and
fences 'and that sort of thing.; The houses are not 'attached.
Across the tiny we've really got something that 'we think As
really going to be exciting and that is going to 'be called
SoUthridge Plade.; It's going to be,a very high security area.
It's going to have single family houses' on separato lots but a
lot a green space around it. It's going to have jogg'ino
trails, possibly 'tennis court, swimming pool. It's' going to
have a masonary wall all the way around the outside of it. I
brought some picture that we took in `Port Worth and in Dallas
th ;t have a siwilar project' and a aisilar look to than to the
arthitenture that we are looking for. I would like t0 jUst
pass them along."
i
r~• ! t J i P .7z:i~
i
Mmotoor wore, it's Jjoing,' to be .a really, , really, atiraot#ve,
rosily, really wonderfUl tea. IA the two section there 'W* are
90149 to do 'a box* along *:Idgeway which is 'goi'ng to set those'.houses
back off the street somewhat and leave; a 0004;4e41 of `'the trees And
4 good deal of the landscaping in front of the `house*; Then itIs
9JA09 to have oul-de-sacs and a street, iVate street, 20 foot
street, in front of those houses. Any guestpxons?"
Charles Watkins, with Fields, Edwards and Associates, spoke in favor.
"Mr. Mayor., Members of the Council, my nano is Charles Watkins. I'm
with Fields, Edwards and Associates,, and an rspreren~iuq Mrs. Storer
in connection with this case. Since the Planning and zoning
Commission rsoomme'nded approval of this case, it has come to our
attention that there was, perhaps, some confusion or some
misunderstanding with respect to this particular cost. It was our
firms responsibility to make application to the City for zoning and
what we did was, we applied for zoning on the entire 83 acre tract
as a planned development simply because it is one unified
development bring developed by one developer, The area, that you !ee
on the, screen that is shown as OP'-10 and teen the blind of Sr46 is
curr.ep x'y 2OA64 Sr-10. The area to the u or right thAt ls `Sr-16 is
currently zoned SF-16. 8e46u6e typically he staff likes a planned
development type of zoning classification because it is all one
unified development, we just auked for planned development' zoning on
the entire tract, The purpose for the band of 00-16 zoning is that.
to the north is existing sr-16 ,housing and the developer agreed to
'put in Sr-16 zoning as a buffer, for the existing SF-lb to the
north. Then the SF-10 area predominantly would be developed as
zoned. When we made this request it was, and always has been, the
intent to lone this area SF-16 and SF-10 in accordance with all tho
City of Denton zoning regulations and to clear up any
misunderstanding we would respectfully request that, if the
council's wishes, to add a condition to this planned development
that all areas designated for single family 5F-16 and single family
OF-1o,, will be developed in accordance with all requirements of
A e of Ordinances of the City of
D6ntonix We Are also' On d9.4n&eta$ o asking for what we labeled single
family attached. Perhaps not the best label in the world because
all through ,the developer has had'one idea in mind ap4 that is that
the houses themselves, the livinq units at a density',leval of only
4.3 units _pot acre, would be built such that the'' living waits would
be detached but the gatagas or fencing Areas would, be attached. I
think that is consistent with some of the 'photo.graphi that` she has
showed You. To clear any 'misundsrstanding' with reii'pect to this
partioular area we'wouid respectfully request that the,;;COUna I14 add a
condition that all dwelling in the single family attached area w:i11
be detached except for accessory Uses such as garages, storage space
and fences. The other item I would like to address if,I may is the
intensity of this area. r believe the staff, I know they looked at
it in conjunction with the Planning and Zoning hearing', was of the
opinion that the area that is designated single family detached,
which is on the 'tight hand side of what to called Ridgeway Driver on
the vngraph, exceeded the intensity standard for that area. Perhaps
: ; ,,i
.3-
the wi,tI addr os yhis `issue latex, I would like to illusticate with
a Mr graph 4441041 sills that 1 did of the area with respect to the
ht hand side Or Ridgewa Dxivot This is is an
intensity on tqe ri:ht'
area that ooaeitts Of 326 acres, it ooludos the Dimension
Developitnt Company proposal and some area to the south of it and to
the north' of it, On the left of the bar graph is the `intensity
standard tot the 326 core area Just the right of that is the
intensity of tho Dimension Development Company proposal, which was
in excess of 160000 trips por dayy Next to that is the intensity of
all existing zoning in this particular intensity area. Text to that
is the `intensity reserved for this particular area and then we have
the intensity of this particular request which is 1,060 trips per
day,. If the zoning is approved then the entire intensity for Vhe
area is shown on the far right and slightly exceeds the intensity
standard. I would point 'out that the 326 acre intensity arsa is
about half the site of a normal intensity area. The prototype wan a
square miles 640 ♦cres, This area is only 326 acres. If you ohVse
to expound the boundaries of the intensity area, this developpont
would fall, practically no matter how you decided to expand the
boundaries, if they were ,,expa'hoed in any logical fashion, the
intensity of this, development would be within :the standards, ' "Is
think it Ia extremely reasonable, I feel that this particular l.'sAd
plan is an exoeileat land' plan 'given this area. It, is ontir,ely
single family developments It will be an asset to this area., it
will resolve future zoning issues because we will have somethin~ on
the ground. I would like to point out again that there are 130.2
cores of SF-10 lots proposedo le acres of SF-~16 lots proposed, and
those large lots are not going like hot cakes, this will be! an
asset to this area; it will be an asset to Southridge anQ I hope,'you
will approve it. Thank YOU."
Mayor Stewart, "Are there any queations?"
There were no questions.
Dr. Roland Vela spoke in favor.
"My name is Roland Vela, Honorable Members of the Council and
)ayor. You have seen me here before, generally labeled as a person
Who is against progress. This tipa', i'm, here on the sid0 of
progress, i ap in favor of this zoning, change or this pl'ilhned
development. You heard earlier someone stay that they were ;favor
raluctantly., I'm not going to say` that. I'm in favor cautiously.
I''have been a homeowner since 1953 and IIve seen one neighborhood
after anotherd4spoiled in that time."
END or SIDE 1 OF TAPE z
BEGINNING OF SIDE 2 OF TAPE 2
to Speak in,favor of it, of this deVelopment because 1,I think.
that it would acaomplah keeping.it as it is, i have a cautious,
approve this lout ouiiy. my, ba"u,tion has to do 'with, the, tot; `the
plan as it is proposed. The plans are always beautittil. The hot
it 1 Jll'. 1
I.M
I
brAath and . the lust for land ,tbat the developer always .,ooiaes very
neatly presented, very neatly dressed and I find 60' fault'at all
with that, but what x 'ox cautious about it is the evi~htualityl it's
what will happen 3 Yeas from now. I spree with whet Mr, Watkins
SOY$4 This i~s a beautiful piece or land.. It ought to lend itself
to beautiful development. lie worrier about the selling of SP-16
lots. They don't go like hot cakes, What I worry about is that
next yea; we will be here again with another proposal to change the
Or-16 to a SP-6 or to commercial or to something else, We are very
fortunate in Southridge, We don't have a pig form close by like
those other poor folks do and I certainly don't gent to soo, anything
like that in'Southr14oe, I have very much'reepect for Xt, Watkins
inviting the City council to put a 'condition on his proposal, or
Mrs. Storer's proposal. That why don't Youcwrite into out proposal
that you, we will be held to the dovolorl~ent that was presented.
that these will` be Single family houses= that they would not be
anything, else. I urge you to do that. I also urge you to set this
zoning and not change it again, We have seen changes over and over
again and, in Most cases, cases in toning are 4etrimsot*1 to a
neighborhood. to this case, I think this particular change would
augment the nature of our neighborhood, I would like to .$06 you
approve it, I would like to see you add the 'seoond condition
together with Mt', Watkins, don't rake any sore changes. Leave it
like that. We have been fightlrq this for 16 years, over since I
have lived, 17 years, since I have lived out there and i really
would like to and that fight,, I really would like for that tlght'to
end. What we have boon fighting for, what we have bogn' holding out
for 'is that this,'the development of this land be Sri character with
what is already out there. Those of us who were early out there
picked that site because that we thought it Would make, `a good
setting for out homes. We than would hate to see another motorcycle
shop out ther6, or a shopping center that would destroy the nature
of our house, I have a very serious question. I have been out of
town and have not been entiroly informed as to what is happening. I
have a"question that says in the proposal before the 'Council tonight
it says an area 'of 9,4 acros SF attached. Mrs. Stoker gave a very
nice description of what that it.. I `am convinced that that is a
b6autiful plan. But it says four units. Is this four` units a one
single dwelling or is this going up 8 stoc.ies,"
Mayor Stewart asked' Dr.' Vela not to ask questions and guaranteed
that the Council would ask that question during the staff
presentation.
Vela
"Well, It let we pit it this way then. I would give hearty approval
to this proposal if, where it says four units it means four 811gle
family dwellings, not four duplexes, or four, quadruplexes,,.,or four
condomihiums per acre. Where it says sits per actor I would give
heartyr approval if that were six single family units and not six
condominiums- each 6 s.t4ri4e high , wtiich . would be a doMpletely
difterd"I th nq. Yet the desdri'ption` on the proposal would' be
identical; would be exactly the sane because it only says six
n r- r-}. r ~ a tr ^m...-nznn .^y~-...;..'^~ .r^ -.y.o ; ..t...--,x....~,,.... ' ~i '
units. It dloesn't;say six units of bet, I'do not want to belabor
you, I think thait I ~7an make my pornt very cleat.
It this is 'Ghe
way that it's going l}4 be cobstruoted, th4t _ it is going to be
developed, I an very mupo in favor of it, I speak only for myself -
I speak for no one else, Ito on toe other hand, this is simply a
scheme by which to introOU06 high density housing a little bit at a
time and next year we will see the SF-16 going into other high
density units because We ;alrea4y have some we might just as wall
have some more and W* can't move the SP-16 lot*, than 14ould be
very much against itand I.would be back here next year vehemently
against it again. But as 1`,t is presented now, I very much favor
it, I do urge the City CouVail to accept Mr. Watkins offer to put
conditions on this and I VoWd urge you to Out a second condition.
To make `this .a substantative ldeseription and to not change it again ~
next year. To hake this condition' t:sat the developer would not ask
rot changes in the near future, or ever again for that natter.
Mould be happy to answer any gltestions."
Mayor Stewart stated that, this Council 0oU14 not bind future
4~ouaoils', It would be illegal to say that no other Council could
look at the soning In this area,
Vela
"Mr, Mayor, this Council doesn't even bind itself. I urge you to
protect the neighborhoods in Denton.11
ter, W. P. Phillipa spoke' in favor.
"i!m,w. P. Phillips, Tsai the attoenoy for Jo Storer and;that is
four units per mire and that's singlf, family units. We have nothing
proposed but single family units period. Let me say that Roland
said that he lad lived out in Southridge for 17 years. My family
has lived in gauthridge for 19 years and we have lived'there longer
than any family in 9outhridge, Ours was the f6urth house
cenSttUCted and the three homes nrioir to our home, they've all moved
off soma other 'place, But we've lived there 19 years, Next year is
the 20th year, I know that because my house will be paid for next
year. 1 got a'20 year loan and I'll be glad.,,
"I'm exd'ited 'about it, I wouldn't be here;,' am an attorn6y, 1
represent P646 le but I wouldn't be here 'representing JO Storer
tonight if i didn, t have confidence in her plan and what, she plane
to do, I am' particularly interested in se'einq the #onpletton of
So►Athridge. Drive to Lillian Miller Patkway, we need another; Outlet
Out there. 'We need to, as hay I'm sure rea`lieescAnd City Manager
Hartung, tt,y` sometimes 'as
to get o$jt ''of bduthrldge but we
need Another,' outlet. wa have not with different' people out there
and they all seem in favor of this plan. Perhaps there's someone
against it and they will'speak tonight 'if they are against it, but I
have not talxed to anyone who is apainst it. And like I say, I've
Iived there, !fox, 19 years 'folk's uou' 1ly when you hevs ;something
affecting Oouthridge, as yqu folks might irlMgine, people have come
out and been against it but they are in favor of this project.
-7 :o
it's single family) it's What, we w nt V-16, And gy-10 and then the
other ptroject$ as outlined. I think Mt, Matkigr has 'sxplainsd the
nten~ti y study out there and I think we pretty *uah come within the
intensity Standard of the City of Denton. I'm not expert in this
but I've talked with the engineers and I 04erstand that is ebout 75
trips per acre per dry and that we come within that requirement, as
I understand; it, I don't have anything ease to say but I hope you
approve it, and if there's any questions I can answer I'll be glad to
do so."
Mayor Stewart asked it the Council had any questions.
Council Member Riddlesperger
"I'd like to ask one question, Ridgeway Drive is, I suppose, half
built isn't it? Does this entail the developet building the other
half?"
Phillips
"Nobo±iy has meAtiotied that to me. That's what we're going to call
Lillian Millor Parkway."
CounoV,. Member Hiddlesperger
"It's only half built though, It's just two lanes."
Phillips
"I understand that, Let me put it this way. I haven't heard anybody
talk about widening that particular parkway at this time."
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denies Spivey spoke for the staff.
"Mr.., Mayor and Members; of the Council.. There_ were 75 reply forms
wailed to property, 'owners within 200 feet, And we have received 5
in favor and 15 in opposition. This 93.2 acre tract is ;located in a
low intensity area as designated by the Denton Development' Guide.
These low intensity areas represent:the. city's primary housing areas
and should emphasize residential use, All of the land uses included
in this proposal Iitie single family uses. in Mr. w4tkigs's
presentation a few moment ago he addressed the i'ntensi'ty `issue to
you and the staff's position before the Planning and zoning
Commission on the intensity issla6 was that the intensity analysis
prepared for the Dimension Development. zoning case indicated than
the zoning approved on that tract' utilized all of the available
intensity on the east side of Ridgeway Drive. The staff report
itAtcboted that to there and suggested that the intensity. standatd for
that area east of gfageway or Lillian Miller Parkway was tilled to
capacity by that Dimension Development proposal and that 'additional`
high intensity and higher density land uses should not be
recommended tot App ,0441, The miniouln reserved development rights
would permit low `density Or-10 type of residential land use if the
intensity was strictly enforced on the east side of LilliMn Miller
Parkway. This was the statt's position. it's true that only, this
development to only a little bit over the proposed intensity
standard. The Planning commission felt that the differenco over the
standard was not enough to make *,significant impact in this case
and the Planning and Zoning commission recommend approval of this
particular request by a vote of 4 to IJ Another issue that staff
was concerned about was that the Dimension Development request was
approved by altering a boundary line of the intensity study
developed by the staff. The staff had prepared an intensity study
as is attached in your back-up for, showing one line and the
Dimension Development Company did a separate intensity study which
is 'indicated as Intensity Study 40A in your bAok-up and they did
adjust the line so that their development would fit the numbers
there, And this second boundary line has never been formally
adopted and staff,, another issue as Car as we were concerned was
that (1) .that that partioUlar line should either be adopted or the
original line should be adopted as the intensity Study. but, in any
case, the Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend approval of
this particular issue and I'll be glad to respond to any questions."
The Mayor asked if there were any questions, The Mayor asked Spivey
to answer Council Member Riddlesperger's question on Ridgeway Drive.
Council member Riddlesperger
"It had to do with the development of Ridgeway Drive; it's Supposed
to be, as I understand it, a four lane road, What I asked, of
oourse, just for my information is whether or not the developer is
supposed to develop the other two lanes,"
Spivey
"At I understand it the two lanes that are currently in or currently
being finished are on the side nett to the single family attached
section which shows up on the map. The developer would not be
required to put that in as it's already there,"
Council Member Riddlesperger
"I'm talking about the other two lanes."
Spivey
"Our platting regulations normally hold developers responsible for
perimeter street paving, areas that are along the frontage of your
property. The single family detached section on the other side
would fall under the normal platting regulations and that can be
enforced."
177 77
777
I' Mayor Stewart
"It is my understanding that when we paved Ridgeway that the
developer as they 0600 through apd developed would pay their portion
of the street. Is this being ignored?"
City !tanager Chris Hartung ~
"No, there is a street assessment for the whole length of Lillian
Miller Parkway and as those properties are chancing hands or being
developed that paving assessment is being retired. In foot, do you
know off hand, Rick, we've retired a good portion of that, in
effect, the developer paid for those two lanes that ate in there
now, The City didn't put that in."
Council Member Hopkins
"OK, to what is going to occur, Chris, is that, are you saying that
the state will be paying for the other two lanes?"
Hartung
"'the plan is to approach the state 'and we are in the process of
putting together a letter to the State Department of Highways and
Public 'Transportation to have this included on the state system as
6n addition to the farm to Market system as ask them to add the two
lanes."
Council Member Hopkins
"OK, that's the way I thought it was. Also, then, are we dedicating
right-of-way in this proposal. Is the total right-of-way dedicated."
Hartung
"It's alremAy there."
Council Member ltiddlesperger
"We've got so or 90 feet?"
Hartung
"It's not 100 feet and I realize that Dr. Stephens likes to see 100
feet some of the time."
Council Member Alford
"What, in the event that the state sloes not do this, Chris, what
would the circumstances be then."
Hatung
"Like any other street, would be city responsibility."
-.°R^y..^ -,-''+l^"_,.,rr,-- •-_-•~-•1--.IT T "1 1 S'r °TIj'~ ~1 '4'; ~7i ~1 t r
77
»9»
Council Member Alford
"to this any dif-#'l)!rent than Mr. Bancroft's here a while beak which
we required hie to do."
Council Member McAdams
"Slightly different. What we asked him to do was both sides of the
street rather than half, His property was on just one side,"
Council Member Riddlesperger
"Even a lot that wasn't his."
Council Member McAdams
"We're talking about an entrance to commercial."
Council Member Hopkins
"The question, is what you're getting at 'should we go ahead and have
the developer do that now and roieburse the cost? Is that what
you're saying?"
Counci Member Alford
"NO; welts Just saying that if we do it on one what's the difference
in anotherV,
Council Member Riddlesperger
"Mr. Bancroft, if you remember, we asked that he develop both sides
of the streets, even including a lot that was not his,"
Mayor Stewart
"l think I can answer that, Jim. That was the minimum width that
the City requires on streets and in order to get the open street, we
did that, Y think this was up off of hart worth Drive, So we could
require hest because of the minimum width of the street. The
minimum width on this is already in and as they develop down to it,
they are paying for it. They have paid for this portion."
Council Member Riddlesperger
"bk, i wanted the information."
Mayor Stewart
"And now, if the state approves this as a fArm to market road up
there instead of Teasley, then it we request them that they continue
it up, then they would pay for it."
W4 I
•Y `R' :r+ i ~n I h,S,_.~y m' 1 ~ .I P Ri ,r r ~ rrR' '+qs- .~4".~~2rs~~`,~ a p rt:- c a ,i ry'~i ~
.
council NO-aber Stephen•
"It You will also rcgall, at our, June 5th tweeting we asked that we
look into a pow ordinance that would reimburse Mr. Bancroft or other
similar situations whoa the area that he had to improve was
developed, 'No dida't get that report, but the idea is not to
pen*li;e hims hole going 'ti: be using till then, but to get
reimbursement from the property Adjacent to that development. This
is exactly the same situation.,,
mayor Stewart
"I'd like to ask a prooedural question. Would this require 6 votes
or a majority of the Council? Was the minimum, or was the
opposition stare or less than 20%? Less?"
Council Member Stephens
**hat was the percentage? 75? 'You say 75 were "oiled?"
Spivey,
"The 75 yes, I wrote it down. 75 were mailed and we received 15 in
oppot~,ition and and 5 in favor. It'O the hand area, not the
owners."
Mayor 'Stewart
"Thatls 20t?°
Spivey
1120% of the land area? The, we, in lookinq at the 15 letters that
came in opposition, they were eingle.°family lots that, a'nd
considering that there were '83 acres, included in the total proposed
developaent., it woe an obvious conclusion from looking at them that
they did not, Would not constitute 20% of th.e 83 'acres plus the lots
all the way around, So, we didn't do an e9act calculation."
Mayor Stewart asked if there wao any more discussion.
Council Member Stephens
"Mayor, I'd like to say soatathiag. I appreciate the concerns that
nave been mentioned by some 'oP the 'folks here. Certainly agree with
Round. 'He and 1 ix "ack a' long ways as do you, Mayor, and looking
at !:,hat area some ;Years at/o trying to preserve the single, family
nature'6f it. I disagree ih part,'but!'of course that can worked out
but mentioned my reservatiohs to the developer and to her whatever
you are, Charlie - hired gun$ her professional here and I. in the
convexsi,tions with them and with the attorney, 1, , Ottaialy
dcvel 6 pe3 into , mi'd~ NAtoh, ' I ' ,didn' t get "the, we came ''to the,
li agreement that the Pbs the pri would certainly, apply to those areas
where a change was to occur. I personally can't see any reason to
R;
' rlir
,
aha►ge the OP-16 to PD or Sy-10 to PD it it's ryoiAq to remain as
Sr.16 or sto-IQ, Ok, ore point, The other' point, number two, is
that the $'ippie family attached part. I have VOVY: strong
reNervations that I've shared with the developer and Charlie, hot
pro,Itessrional representative, and in all, areas of town you have
attached by fences so that's the standard detaohed but mentioned
that briefly to the developer when they began the first stage of
de~slo Out and so that's pretty well 'what would be typicatil#
Bos,ut3ul pictures have been circulated. Where are no 'probleas
about that. I don't 'think this would be a substantial change and
ha+1a to go back becaure'we're not making the folks lose it all.
But I would like to move the approval of ?,-1682 with the Conditions
attached that the only planned development part would be just &A a
land use change occurred. The single family you lies the sholed
areas' n'both sides of Lillian,Xiller Parkway. That's one thing. on
The other is that on the West side of , the Parkway that.;we 'change to
bepooi* single taiaiiy detached. It would still be ';2ero ,riot line, 'tor
i; ei1*01e in a ;clustered 'arraagsment but I would oe~;tainir feel bs*t,ot
,protected -by ' havinq the single family detached re04 eo on ' the ,ptio-
And .the petitioner said to 9446 over the phone that, it would 'meet the j
general requirements and ideas that sihe had. YoU' 11 have the fence
con''hocted to the houses at bestand otill have your closeness there
and artistio ' design but I believe that the, I feel as ot,hors I've
talked to feel, mots secure to qustd against this sortat thing, as
Dr. Vela pointed out, that it might be for some other City Council.
9%) I would like to make that with those two conditions:, that i
understand, have no reservations from the petitioner'."
Mayor Pro Tee Chew j
"Mayor, I'll seconded it with those conditions." ~
I
Mayor Stewart
"ild like to ask a question. Ray, were you in on as on the j
negotiations on this?"
Council Meaber Stephens
"Negotiations? No, I 'didn't negotiate. I did visit with the
petitioner a time or two as you well know and took the time on that
and with some 6f the, neighbors. The petitioner wanted to talk about
and show the plan and wanted to show it to some of the individuals
out there. we have come close in our feelings and the; desire to do
what's beat for the total community and for that neighborhood and
everything will be fine. So, yes I have visited with this
petitioner as I have with most of the petitioners that 'leave come
before this group, When they talk to me,'I believe that I ought to
respond. I've never turned anybody away yet and don't propose to. i
17 ' ^^7'~.Rr^,r`n"r.}!_~"r„';I""°{ H' ~,'r PS^ '^1"T^`°i'7 T ' 11..' v 1 Ir !r i.a..r t'rr,rnr I~ °"*Tf.(1 'j ~•9,eer TSasa rr m ~ wl.
~11
y
..lx^
Mayor Stewart
"Did you call a meeting on this, by any chance?"
Council Member Stephens
"At the request Of the petitioner to get the group together, She
said she would like to talk to them and wanted me, #v the. elected
representaative for shat district to share with them her ounoern that
they Would like to meet and talk this out. The nUmber grew and grew
beyond what would fit into a living room, so, indeed, we did most.
1, introduoed her to thee I had just not her a short time beforeo
introduced her to the group, I asked the group to come for her
address, 1 merely convened` the meeting. I stepped out at that
point; they Carried it on further. No agreement, arrangemegt or any
thing else was realched. It Was a general discussions a neighborhood
aocounting if you 'mould. What's why it was very well received and
that's the important step."
` Mayor stewart
"was any of the City staff at this meeting?"
Council Member Stephens
"I don't recall Any of the City staff being present,"
Mayor 'Stewart
"It's my understanding that one or two were,"
Council Member Stephens
"Who?"
Mayor Stewart
"The secretary for one."
Council Member Stephens
"I don't recall that. .014.40 Didn't have any staff members
present. I don't recall any being present. Sharron was still in
the buildings but she didn't, she left some `density/ intensity figures
that she had located.. $'harren left those figures on the desk in. the'
management area. out I 'don't recall any staff being present.
Mayor Stewart asked if there were any other questions or discussion.
Na ~ :'r, t a ..f 'r!7` i E T 6•i 1 1'.
77, ,
City Manager HiOUntr
"Mayor, may, I ask the staff a 40estion' or Charlie. These f1*14
notes reflect the entire area so we'd have to have new field notes
it we were going to do what has been e0ved."
Watkins
"Yes. Is
Hartung
"Oki I justed to be clear. I-think the motion is to direct the
Attorney to modify the ordinance with those #uggeations and bring
that back,"
Council Member Stephens
" x refleote, aaa as far as X know x `do~i`t?, knoll anybody who
disagf4es because 'that is the intogt of the pxoposal, So that the
only thing PD'd +rould be just vhere 'the land use changes and the
attached on the west side would be dotaohed."
Hartung
"Right. Then held have to revise that clad bring it back on the next
'
agenda for Council approval,"
City Attorney Morris
"you can go 'ahead and approve with those conditions and bring it.
back and approve the ordinance.'"
Mayor stewa'ct
"'The motion was to `approve the ordinance with the changes that
Council'-Mon'ber Stephens made. He (Acting Attorney Morris) said that
the they wouldbe hanged have to be brought up at a later date and that
on the ordinance."
Council Member S.tophehs
Hit would'refloct the ideas expressed here."
Council Member McAdams
"And I was going to observe that I think that this pal;,ticular
request gives some credence to' the .one that we looked at earlier in
that this one provides for .6 %inits per acre which discussed earlier
es, being 6o ';objpotiogebie in 'an'-#rea of 14,rgo: homoi., this, w041d
iiuggest that T,etrhaips its' ist~! t difficult with I Arge lets or somebody
Ether .than Mr. Hodgson to develop. Si.x units for acre is a16ceptable
and failed."
r
t i a
1 f 1 ;
r
Council Member Riddlespaxger
writing in or what
the the motion is to approve with the simple*
they have expreesOa there, Y think it ought to be written,"
Motion passed S to 2 with Cnltnoil Mee*er Hopkins and KAYOr Stewart
oastinq the nay votes.
i
i
77777,
7777T'77- T
i..
PW1Ni1; J J1 Xq~Itwo C'p XBION"
I CO' W"TION TIM Lift COMB.
Tot pontoo city Cau40il
Caee NO.: z-1W Meeting Date; Senttaber 4, 1904
015 49AL INFORHAVON
Applicant: Jo Storor
Rt. N1, Box 276
Argyle, TX 76726
Otatus'of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in Zoning from too 0100,16
fa~til)t (88'-l0, 8f'-x4) '~tOnitid o),asa»
iticattoA, P to the pi.{ianed 44'i 091111
(Ptl) classiticition. 4t a 0,0400
the PD will pl)rtait tho tol owing used .
1. 38.2 acres of f 1gle f&mi 1y
(SF;10) `detaghdd l0d use (105
lots wiith'a density of 2.7 units
per care).
2. 18 acres of S ogle family (5F-16)
dotadhed land uoo (32 dots With a
dobsity of 1.6 units per core).
3. 17,6 acres of einglo "fariily do-
t:ached land use (106;'units With,
a density of 6 uhits'por Acre).
4. 9.4 acres Of single family at.
tachod land uee (40 units with a
density of 4.3 unite per acre)
Location and Size: An 83.2 Acre tract located on the
east and'Wdst sides>.ot Lillian 'Mille-
Pairkway, beginning approximately
1;000 feet South of I.H.'35L
Sur:routidigg Land Uee
and 'toning: North - Vacant, Shopping center under
construction; 2F, dR
South w Vacant; PD-;19
East, - Vacant; SIP-`100 A
West - Single family residential;
8F-10 S!'-16
Denton DevelopmentGuide: Area is designated as low intensity,
y
..iaLi!. Lull i_.:~ L 1/A1y «YI IL.. ..ail.. ~I
.,...,n
4 t t. r , i
ASS 'H'MO
ePICIAL iN"VN,' ION
Drainage: Thor* are some drainage queetione to
be addrsso*d in this aroa,, storm
sewer pipes will be"req}ti,g+d ad some
ford of dothnti'on will prab#bty be
required, As always, drai'nage'mat-
tern caa be addroseed during the
platting stage of development
Transportatica: The major traffic issue is the use of
Gillian Miller parkway6, Lillian
Millet Parkway has 00'"xeet of
goiaated right'-of-wag and'a xd fQOt
~i,Iat on is u.bds't cono, tuction at this
b~poa . ~t'Lil,lian
tir~a. x is,
lNii10 Pafkwr4y~,,rill 1 ;vim•t'o1y; be
ti4o#i4nated is I►.,. l01. en4.
acodpted as part Of 'the atate,,highildy
$yetep►. The Tt!ans'ortatioo engineer
is Cobaerned that the integrity of
Lillian Miller Parkway be *Aintaigad.
Public Vtilitiesi Curtently existiag_water and sawar
lines aris not ,adequate 'to serve the
proposed development New Water
linos must be provided. The de-
va'oper abet either rebuild the
Hobson Lift station or build new
gravity lines to oonnoot with the
State School sewar line. Electric#
t*lo0hone4 gas and cable T.V. fa-
oiiities:can'be provided for the
proposed development.
ANALYSIS
This'"83,2 acre tract is located 'in a low inteoaity area. Ac-
cording to the I)onion Development Guide, low ikehiity areas
teproa,ent;the'city's primary housing areas'ind'should ot0haaize
reaidebtial use. All of the land uses proposed Ora single
family uses.
~R 1. I 7 rt°Try'~f.. '--^~r~ •:i' ,r.. r i TkVt i ^HV, A vrr.l.'+"
51 + v , i i i'+ + k ' ,i
.f
dslao t 41682)
age rhtoo
ANALYSIS (contiAued)
on dune 19, 1984 the OILY Council appprovOd the plannod devel*
opment zoning request of Diale~naion Development ,jun.t Youth of the
red for x-10
proposed'deyeloPagent. The intensity analysis rFil
on that
(Dimension Development PD) indicates the zonin ~Ood
utiltze all of the available intons tn' his area.
tract will Thestaff report for that ease specifically Otares the fotl,ooingc
"It 'is stron ly recommended chat decision makers reaaein mindful
of the fe,nt that all available intensity has been allocated at
and hear the corner of Ridgeway Drive and Teasley Lane;
ther"efore, future pressurea for higher intensity uses along this
corridor should be rejected or Development Guide policies should
be ganged.' 'the plan for this area was reviewed by the
Ueve, 0~sgOnt,ksOew Coawgittos`on June 19, 1.584` end the Planning
cadoaunit p,. velopfaaant Department oauhanted as follows:
nCeps ty s ahJard or area east of idgeway', riV~p hash 'A
f,i l l'0 t'o cap,,ac i tyy by itnene ton Dev~1 dnt ; pt'opOMa 1, ap r d an
June` iy,. 198+ by CYCy GounAdd'i'tot` had hi"gyp inten~siy ',er~d
hi he donsity land uses (no oaatter how attraa,tAvely `depai ned) ;
will not be rocommendsd for approval by 'the P ann,ing and ' oning
reserve develops►eht
. ,
Commiseigrr and. City Counc 1 Minimum rights
would pemit'low density ~SP'w10 type) residengiol land'use only
if intensity is strictly enforced'on east side of Kidgeway
Ur i ve
The a ioas shown on the attached concept plan asSF'-10: and SF-16
are aready in existence as suoh. It was the developer's .Wish
to advertise all of the proposed development in order to Make
the neighborhood aware of the comprehensive.plan for the area as
a whole `'The areas on the west side of Lillian Miller parkway
shown as single 'family attached do not violate the overall
intensity standard.
RUCOMMENUA' ION
As_indicatod in the analysis above, all of the'intanoity on the
e ast side of Lillian
mentMirioeosal,' Ty he w Uimepsion ted Deva e thelopment
Dimension 'Develo
roposa1 Was,over the intensity standard; in the original,study.
he Dimensihn Company Submitted a new intensity study with
altered boundaries,. Their proposal fit within the, standards of
the altered intensity area; however, the boundaries''of the
intensity study at`ea have never been formall ch'an'ed to
coijicide with the revised boundarles of the imans on Study.
Therefore, staff did not recommend approval of this case.
I { 7r 771,7 J.' 7 7 -^-7^r7 e7777 '.r"''`?rr-^777777 +..P*_ ~ s•~(QaBe M ~-xdi4) ,
Palo Dour
12COilRNUTtox (Continued)
Due to the account of vacant land reftainipp► in the area. atsff
roooxmendba impl4*44tinq Interim Policy Io•Ue ill in the proposed
revisions to the povel,opmeat duide. That polioY roads as
follows: "The Chandin of an are4's inteasity`index standard is
considered a oa)or deorsion-of the City add therefore inor4mont-
al planning aotivi,ties and decision$ that will Change the Our-
coat or proitotod intensity of an area should be tabled, tiv*
referred to thhe Plaainning a iin4,Zoaibq Comaiyy oibrit TheRaplannning be
and xoniq,q study will focus on the area's Intensity question*
Addressing the neod and impact of ahaagqinq aia area's intensity
index st`a~adard. The study roCommea44Ginn wilt be fbr 4idsd to
City Cil nail for f.ioai Aotiood" xh~► Plan , 0 a<n4, xo iaq.
ComMiision`flit;that 'the' sa~c 4t this prdpo 41:yould,cot b*via
onough of '4n` iapatit `on thb' igt4hsitx;'of this Area: to roo'omsoind
denial of this case. The planning and Zoning commission recosl-
mends aporovai of Z-1682 by a vote of 4-2.
UTERNAT I VE5
11 Approve planned devolopuent with Conditions.
2. Approve p'iannod develop*ent without Conditions.
3. Deny planned development request.
4. Table Planned development request to allow time for special
intensity study of the area.
ATTACtMNTS
1. Aerial
2. PD Concept Plan
3, Map of our,rent intensity study area
4. -Hop of Dimension Development intensity study area
5. Reply form totals
6. Pro04rty owner list
`l. Minutes of 'the planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
August 8. 1984
0195]
,z
lJ~~ 1 T't •
J A r
\ ~ 1 ~ r ~ ♦ .yiy
41~
a1~., ~ L f ~ 1.1
t~i•
. s ~
AV IL Ik 11
ti
1 ~
. ~ vcy
T' r'. v\
1 ,
• i A ~ 61l ~ r'. AID' ~ ~i ~
i
CONICEPT PLAN
AREA 7XW DFA •'i i'v
8 1 Z SF- 1O 1C5 tub, ~ 7..
18,0 5 3Z IIH
9.4 SF Arroyken 40 Oft;% ' fi x N
4001
17.E y `3F• >CtiiCNCn 106 JUNE ZLI0304
i
S . F. - 16
,a
$ 1 f 1 10 rt l' LOCATION MAP
t 0 1. z oars
.f
i
.1
III/'•' .1' Nl~f~ r
w
I
M'.
i,` Ll
1
ON%
~ nrrrrrr r~ 'Y
PD- 20 -45
♦w r . ~.I SCALL10III1000, WORT" 60
♦
60
d
,
A
20
I
a ~
j Po- ~e + a
f 3"140 tmol"
I SCALE "-1400'
-ter r rr I r r _ r
` iPOGU~
sq" i i
~ ;T~* ~~~...:7^I"'W7STa ti °',Rt it e9 ,6Y ra+ e
-7 77- 7'
ftarmy
CII 4 IY~IN/ Y
Z"1602
IN A"I, IN OPPO ON UNDICIDED
Z. Ht sell J. P, 'MaNO l
1212''Stonegete 2252 StoAOO*te
Denton, Texas Denton,Takas
Steley to%~ Ikner T inda Stephens
2 37 Stonegate 610 pidgeorest Ciroln
Denton, Texas Denton, Texas
Ka a Mccallon Fred Arrington
Ridgearest 601 Aidg6orest
Denton, Texas Denton, Texas
Douglas Ebersole W. D, Nichols
~~41 Ston*04te 11 PS 'Skylark
Denton, Texas lemon, Texas
Mrs', Prank. `Jones
225 Stoneg4te
Denton, Texas
Don S' Fletcher
615 kidgecre®t
Denton, Texas
R. B., Escue
707 Ridgeorest
Denton, Texas
Mrs. Ruth K. Munson
701 Ridgeorest Circle
Denton► Texas
Gale B..Lowe
2205 Hollyhill
Denton, Texas
`
~ T77 ~777-,nTWr
k~ y r!;,
v
~ 4 I 9 1
v 3 1 . .
17
oz,
r..
7014
,
ors
144
4
•
at
1~ Ll~nl~w~l~ f.c Qfw1ia.. QUOJ
~ r
1
C
All& ICdtg bAU 4, Ch A110 J,
Q
1
r7 LIJAnolptilt
r
{
Sea Te 1 ~h1~tin 1 LJ~1j( q,"20 y
Elm }'T mr 7 1 777777
.2 1 4
1
AA A&AYAA
vr.~w
M-P
44 pmmqw~-- ft WE MWMiA
i
t A.
IA'
f
,
'71 Jh-l
r
LqAti, 11 Ap It
'Aid It 74A.=Ald
RAkirl
A
ih rLO /I AO A '4 -4 514
...r..rr....~
i
,'Y' , 1 1~it~1'~' ;~:'^~T,n^r •iT r11~7 I`=71117117, -r"'~ ..-r.-•---^FP"rv-m ,'r- --^T q
41 -
1
r
i
. I
gi IV 21 141-4-1kAg.,64
y
.2 ft-3 q
'Air
7
'Tic L a
Y
ItAbil AI re AhA44A
1
"a T~;~n then 7r
Ld A Ad 11 It A-- r7
Q %J
h /
rZ /
1 1 .
74
Ago n
2,2 Li
d LA
171
r rl`:~,r S`-1~^y '.m ..,.te..T..~.7~..` "-s..l P,"9 ^'*r^ ^^.e.'n'~'~'^'.^•'^ r t.:~ r~ .Iril~ ' +
t ~
Al A- iCtAgAlms
,
t
1
r
9 1" All fn A
44
t 1-rat 4,0.. 1
PA A
L1ai
f
Ao Z"
...2 lbe. in 11 -S
r /
s
Y id CA" f- 4" d 11 .14 A 7Z
ill 17 Lark krl- A-4 to
I'd 4A LJSd
7
f
4e- A', t, d A rd,
j'14 Io
77 f 74
i ~ t 1 rE~ k11; r ~
701 wen 7-Y !xrj,
10
1 '
Cpgm w If -4
l i
t
Ali <i&A AAA t
(ol`~ ~Cic q~c VC
241
re Zi
RA I d4 atte 14
..it rro 6,1 Ch
641A A 91 2,e I
04 -4L4),AJoij P7
i
T pw Te t; era y~ _ r r iT
a~j l ~w etc . t Rte. 1 ,7
-77-77777~7~ 77 7-
IA fit A 1"At
Ad A"a &I
C ~
-4 14Ah S. / &A A
54 4 A 11A
~i
C
X 6
lhin~~r.s
PJAI
11
"'-A 4A. `
i
S,'z. 7 i ra..` S` ''^R7RR[I`PMi-7PT .[w .'R1.~; xi► q igyp. ° ° ..vo3'~'r~'+m n~ ^qm* . e%7
PhL14NOi
198e +
August 00
Pape T
12. Dev 1o`p0r shall in#tall s 190 sower line from'~'her
develApi nt up, Woodrow cane to the Pecan CoreeK twin
interceptir lines;
Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried (6-0)
Mr, Mayer comMent'ed that the city at any time can initiate
rezoning of any property.
86 rZ-16026 This is the petition of Jo Storer requesting
AonaNgs in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and,
~SP-16) zoning classifications 'to the planned dYel'o'pai'ent
Pf ~e :ei►a; rli~iw;s fiO&tj r
eides of. jidgewa°y' Drivebe,!Oh-l ~ gpxaxi-
d r~ately, 1x000 feet south Of 1nt~rstate Highway ot. if
ipp'rowed, the planned deve1000'O t will perMit the fb1
lowing land uses:
.~d,2 acres of single family (SF-10) .detsened' lahd use
(105 lots witn a density of 2,7 units per.acre)
i8 `acres of s `ngle family, (SF-16) detacned land` use
(3.2 lots witn a density of 1,8 units per ac'to)
17,6 acres of single family detached land use
(40b units witn a density of 6 units per acre)
9.4 acres of single family attached land use
(40 units oitn a density Of 4.3 units per acre)
Ms. Spivey stated there were 75 reply farms mailed to
property owners witnin 200 feet of the suoject,property; 2
were returned in favor, 8 in opposition and i undedided.
$ne stated that Planning and Xoning Commission and.City
Council did approve a zoning, 'case for Dimension povelopment
(PO-19) and prior to approvalt staff did an intensity study
for this area, She stated Dimension Development did, absorb
411 of the intensity on the east side of Ridgeway Drive,
She further stated there has been no formal decision to move
the intensity, study bowdary lines and since the Denton De
velopmetft Guide is in the process of oeing updated, staff
recommends taolin9 Z-1682.
Ms. Storer explained the proposed and showed pictures of
other areas in Dallas and Fort worth comparable to what
she is proposing to build, Sne stated it would 6e called
Southridge Place, (condors and townnoUses) and would have
security guards on the property, She stated this is a
viilagi'o` ndept, Sho stated this is hot a dense area and
sne doesn't intend for it to us dense.
+k'
n^ r Pr r ta.~+•,':a`4q +n,~s{~R7S5 'T'ei7~7"
P Y Minutes
Auyuat 1#M
Page A
Mr; +:nerles Wsitk4n}, a ple''66sr with Fields Cgward* ahb
Aseoaiatee eve o01 ip+sriA0rts1"fgr the over±oil density, and
iangl,use ar a;4 Ne stated there are 274:genexation,tripe
per day; He stated there has been "a lot'of work done with
the neighborhood and the developer is facing some time res-
traints.
On'question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Watkins stated there is
nova great deal of demand for SF-10 and SF-16 mousing on
today' a' market, He adoed, SF-10 and SP-16 tends to move
rather slowly.
Mr.- .P,;Phillips .stated, he is An attorney in Denton and
repr##tnting Ms., Storer. As etatee nit n'osle w'as tr~`e four,tn
oospltetr,lld in Soui~nridge an'd'str'ated'r►e"+ies;liva¢ there ,long..
er, than'' any fosil,y. He ;st;" tad three 'has n6C daih a' neigh
oorh,40g..As"sociation in southridge tot a "long time,out,
Ms. ' Storer has done 'all to meet nu, re,coofttndationt .of the
ne100004000 , He stated ;',the ~66:othdod is very exotted
aboyt $ou Oridge Drive being developed to Aidgeway grlve,
He stetted the`neignbornood had expressed concerns about' 'the
intensity on the west side o.f-Ridqaway Drive and wanted the
proposed moved to the east side of Ridgeway Drive, which
Ms. Storer did. He stated most people he had talked to are
excited about the proposal as they are single family homes
and wanting Southridge to be'`developed.
Mr, Mitchell Turner, a resident of Southri'dge, stated that
the Denton Record Chronicle stated staff would recommend
t;blinyy this request or there would be a great deal of the
Southridge people here to speaK in favor Of the proposed.
He stated me felt it would not have much effect on the
density.
Richard Sims, a resident of`SoutMridge, stated me has been
over to looK at Riageway Drive and it's a very narrow street
and will create a lot of traffic p'roulems, He stated he is
conoa'
tne
"d about traffic in the whole area. He is glad to
nave ahotner way in and"out`of Southridge, out is dohettned
with more development, it will increase the' traffic flow.
Ms, Spivey again stated staff recommends the request be
taaled froln the sta'ndpoi'nt that Dimehsion Development has
taken Up all the intensity in the area. Sne'furtner staffed
staff-nas no opposition to the type of land use.
On question from chair, Ms. Spivey'stat6d the 'intensity
study shouiU take no longer than 6 weeks.
~±lf*.~t+wgraw^ Ii~T~ATygP'M, 7 i.,"Y,v.m^.
i
P R Z Minuiee P
Adgwst , 19N
Pepe 9
M Sio~ox ques i no* iw t this out of ' Q.rdir 'since . thi ~ is _
p fnneq develOp+a nt, He rood if, : 4 i4o"Lisinn oould not
tike action on the, west side df Rioq,oway Orive and table
action on the east 'sine of Ridgeway Drive.
Mr.' Meyer stated the request was advertised as a whole PO
and not a partial.
Mr, Oatkins stated he would ask Commission to approve-rather
than table or approve partially,
on question from ahoirtMao Storer stated yes, she would
accept approval on thy or all.
'Chair declared publio'hearing ol0sld4
Mr* Esaue made a Motion to tsoie 1»16a2'.tor six weeks
until a~now inton's"i'ty Atu¢yy could ae done. Seconded uy
Mr. uliiborne ~lot,on failed"2-4. (Ms.-Cole, chairman
i.aForte, Mr. Pearson and Mr. SidOV voted no,)
Mr. Claioorne Commented tnat there will oe a grest.press'ure
on'tne traffic on Ridyew4y Drive and Stated 'he is in favor
of tabling until Commission can receive an intensity study,
Mr, Pearson stated, he would like to see_the.,request pass.
He reels i,t is a good plan and thera are going to be
pressures on Ridgeway Drive.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to approve z-1682.. Seconded oy Mr.
Pearson and passed 4-2. (Mr. Escue and Mr.. Claiborne voted
C. L- 693. This is the pstition;of w. S. Nash reouesti'ng
a 4nge in zoning froo the single family (SF-7) classi-
fication to the planned development (PD) olossificstion
on a 19,1 acre ;trsct located on the west s;i'de of Stuart
Road, approAimatoly ,f08 feet 666th of Windsor Drive. - it
approved, the planned development will'~permit the Bevel
o8mont of 96 zero lot line units (typical lot size
4l1' X 110')
Ms. Spivey stated there were 29 reply forms mailed to prop-
erty owners with 2OU feet of the subject property; 1 was
returned in faovr and 8 in opposition.
04%
r4 I 1-4 V ~
1..
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING. THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, A$ SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX Tp THE CODE Or URD1-
NANCE9 OF THE CITY OF DISNTON, TEXAS, gY ORDINANCE Nq", 69.1, AND
AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 53,1 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED'IN THE JOHN
MCGQNAN SURVSVo ABSTRACT NO. 797, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND
LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST $IDRS OF IILGIAN MliiLER PARKWAY
WINNING APPROXIMATELY .1000 FEET SQVTH OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY
35Et TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING C4ASSIF,ICATXON AND USE
DES$ONATION FROM SINGLR FAMILY 10T10' AND 'SF-l6• DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE *0 PLANNED UHVELOPMENT 'PD'
CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY) AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREHY ORDAINS% ,
SECTION I.
That the Zoning Cla841404tion and Use.. designation
Applicable to all or part of the OKOpetty aescribOd as Tracts
One and TWO In Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part
hereof for all putposeeis hereby changed from Single Family
'SF-lo, and "SF-l66 ' District classification And Us* to Planned
Development `PD' District Classification and Use under the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, T,ixas.
SECTION II_.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, T4pta8, aaopted the
14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under ordinance No.
69-11 be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in
District Classification and Use.
SECTION III.
I
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the comprehensive site plan attacnea hereto and
made a part herein for all purposes.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas; hereby
finds that such change is in accordance With a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
City of D4nt6n, Texamo ano With reasonable consideration, among
other things; for the character of, the district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular usea, and with a view to,
consetving the `value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraging the most approprihte uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, 'Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be' in full force and effect
immediately after its passaged and a ptoval, the requited public
hearings having heretofore: been hell by the Planning and Zoning
Commi'ssA and the ''City Council of the City of Denton, ` Texas$
after giving dub notice thereof.
Z-1652/JO STOREItjPAGB 1
4~ t y..
1 l
PASISYD AND APPROVED thl* the day of 1981
RICHAAD . T r RAYOR
CITY OP 98NTON# TEXAS
ATTESTt
C OP TOVo TEXAS
APPKUVrD 48 TO LESAL PORNi
M 0. MO"lSp ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Or DI:NTON# TEXAS
HY ` "dun
x-1582/JO STOKER/PACE 7
S
.m,,.~.,~m rte; .mw~, y.n . 1 , 7
1417 , 77-1 7, -1 1
F 1 I L D N 0 T C S
first Trsa.t ,
All that polt'tain 66,0n$ Aare treat oil ppares; Of lAnd sttuated iri the
John 0latloa'Iti SUrv.,y, ,,k~etraat Nunb*r 795, D41n1lan County, TeXast said
tract bolnq part of tl,e tr.lat aesc>;ihed in deed fKom 3outheldo;o Aeso-
ciation, reo, to Amurican t)avings Association of Dallas as recorded
in. Volume r06, Pat,* J 6'of the Deed Records of Denton County, Toxast
said tract Ireing wore foll'i describet; herein ry metes and houndos as
follows.
Beginroilg for thy roost: nor:herty horthwout corner of t`,s tract boin
desoributl ruruin, an iron On 'ound it the northeast corner of Lot 1q,
ialOck 38 .thYldy~ as rcciirdel in Volume 4, page 13 of the Plat Records
of 6'unton .:<:anty, Tuxass
ThN,nea the Hollowing calls along d south lino of aforementioned Block 38
Southridge
South 't0 degrees 14 minutes 56 ueeonds I:ast,33,1 feet, an iron pin
South 69 dagreas 05 minutes East 100.31 feet, an `iron pin ast,
South "0 dsgesea 45 minutes 50 seconds East 110,1 feet, a fqurtd
it4't, ppin, '
south'.'t5 degitees 31 minutes 24 seconds East 116.61 'feet, stn iron
pin itet,
South t13 degrees 27 minutes 04 aaconds Mast 115.3 feet, an iron pin
Soto
South 119 degrees 46 minutes 24 :seconds East 142;4 feet, an iron pin
get,
North ;14 degreas 14 minutes 06 seconds 14ast 143.0 feet, art iron 'pin
Set,,
Nortn 69 dog.-ant 25 minutes 36 seconds East 140.0 feet, an iron pin
set,
North 69 degrees 53 minutes 46 seconds Fast 140.2 feet an "X" in
olurtric box,
North 56 degrees 39 minut-as 37 seconds East 126.8 feet, an iron pin
found,
North 16 dogcees,30 minutes 12 :seconds Last 126.83 feet, an iron pin
sound, an
North -IS degrees 17 minut.as 17 seconds ;last 193.04 feet to an iron
riu found in the northeast line of Solrthridge Drivel
Thence Nort;l'. 38 degrees 05 minutes 14 seconds Wept 312.88 feet with the
northeast boundar,, tin* of Southridge Drive to the most south corner of
Lot 22, eli:wk 4 of Southridge as shown by,plit recorded in volume 3,
f page 51 of -.he PIAt Records of Dento.i county, Texast
Thence the 'Ollowtnq calls with the occupied back of lot line of said
Block 4-
North '50 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds Fast 134.32 feet, a found
iro:t pin,
North W degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds Sast 227.2 feet, an iron pin
t set,
North 0 degrees 40 minutes 31 seconds east 89.21 feet, an iron pin
set,
North 0 degrees 16 minutes 50 seconds Bast 313.1 feat; an iron pin
found and
North 19 degrees 17 minutes 17 seconds East 302.24 feet, an iron
pin tetl
Thence South 01 degrees 08 minutes W asocondl East 445.0,8 feet to the
southwest nurner ~f Lot 8, block 2, erwin Su'n-division)
.
Thance North 69 dsglcees 46 minutes 11'sirondli Eaot"369.194ee11 with the
south line of the Erwin s'ubdivialion to an' iron pin at the Korthwat
corner of a tract conveyed to the City of`Uent:on, by deed of reetord in
Voluate '340, page 223, In said deed cecords'for northeast corner of thist
x-1682/EXHtBtT "A'/PAGE 1 OF 3
'7 1-17i 7 T- I
.
"the nc~~wlth Eh•' +•Ilb 1'sn$I of ,4:14, CttY Of Urntoh tR(nCt with • 'atlrv* to
qhh! l~M~t w,ltli a,.recllu• of 753, fro; it
a•ritr+ri ai{al'4 a£ 30 dlgr!!s
1# MindRou 16 pncood•, s tan gent, of ~ft4,16 !!!k or d diittd~oe at
391. fout to "An''IYon pin set At the dlnu of sAid curve, and south 20
dqpru~(I'4,S minutee 03 second/ woo t 1623.27 feet to the south line of
sNid ltofuwiin ~urvoy)
Thence ,EOU';h 88 6okiress 40 minutes i3 seconds 1~,cstr 1743,98 feet with
t the north iine of a tract conveyed to Itarmon by <I+ied of record in
Vol me 40,.'page 143 In said D*46 Recortle to the southwest corner of
tltils an(i tor,thwest corner of 4411110 HArmon tract, An iron pin tot)
Thcnca Vorth 00 don rocs 33 mImutos 16 saconrs Wclit 418,?4 feet to an
iron pin ai tho northeast corner of the tract dolecribed in deed from
Ntohola t.C hoksae' and Suilivan as 1iocor(16,i .n 11~krc A39, recce 60, .n
Baia dead rQcordnr
rnenee tix fOllok,tn(r cAlln Wirrh 0 sGuth Ml east line of ;outhridgn as
recordod ir, Volur,c pnpe 331 in the Plat 1lscords of. said Countyl
icirth 08'dagraes 36 ninutel 10 second.4 rrast 47,2 feet, an iron pin
i eet,
North 01 dpcrrees 22 minutes 20 s•conlc Wost 139.2 foot, an iron pin
tlet,
Neettl 07.dooree• 50 minytas )0 r oonds Vaist 12.2 feet, an Iron pin
sot. in thb south line ui Lyrlhurstr
Ntlr`%h 12 'd!{lr+rns 44 minutes 20° seconds 'East 169.1 foot, an 'iron pin
`Ili t ,
North 25 degrees 06 minutes East 103.7 `foot am Aron pin set
466th 43 degreca 2l minutes 10 seconds last 128.0 feet, an Got pin
NQt,
Vorth 33 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds East 109,0 feet, an iron pin
set in, the south line of 11ollyhill Drive, and with ara of carve,
whose onord betare South 69 dlgro*a 32 minutes 45'seconds Eaut
56:64 feet to an iron pin in the south line of Hollyhill Drive
at thu end of said curve, and North 24 doorees 04 minutes 20 seconds
DAst 195,0 feet to the Place or geginnina
x-1682/EXHIBIT "A'/PAOE 2 OF 3
71777*-rm r^r'* s~r^ R\T
KLIL0 NOTES'
3!4RA$?~r~S?S
A l of chat cart4in 11.6480 we tract or as col of land a part
o the John Mc(lowao Survey, Abstract Number 797 to the 6ity of
ounton. oanton'Countyy, 'eras, and being the %Ast part of that
cortain tr of deeorNod th deed from Wsittman TYu4coe to Denton
$osidsnt1-4 N.V, by do*d of record in Volume 486, pv;* 923, in
the deed records of said County, and
Cor"oncino.. at the southeast corner of the Denton Rs6'iotntial
tract mentioned above, the south-east corner of said M4(=owan Sur•
vey, an iron otn,
Thence South 88 deRrRes 40 Minutes 15 seconds West 1040,4 feet
to the mAnt of bekinninRi
Thence Smith Sa deftv.Raa 40 minutes 15 seconds Vest 1112,7 rest to
ikon pin sat of the,;N4thsast corner of a tract convayod to Cho'
Clay of`oenton by d644 of record in Volums 1340, past 223, icaisid
dapd records fox soutWist corner of this, an.4kohhn pln,for ddi-neri
e~tatutes M secondssF.Ai't 1153.59dfeetyto a noinitioreoor ire 41'#
Thenco with a eurve to the'.loft' with a central a"Itle of 30 dexcN s
0 ninutas 08 seconds a radius of 904,55 feet and whose chord 'bears
South 76 depress 14 minutes 31 seconds East 470,04 Not a total are
distance of 475.5() ?act to the and of said curve;
Thence North 88 derruss 41 minutes SS seconds East 68,14 feet to a
point;
Thence South 02.degrseA n4 mim utes 25 seconds Cast 875.24 feet to
point of beeinnino
t«1682/EXHIBIT "A'/PAGE 3 OF 3
18.2 SF 10 106 L~tr
ie,Q.._ yF y1Q. 3z 1.6
11,4 SF.nrrMNrn 4C) U, fs 1.
17.6 'iF, )~TaL.oti 106 (10 1 400'
N .r S, f ; Ib JUNE U-11U4
11 ~
\~,S F, - Igo b
a ~
S fi
$ , F. - I O i! k~, 1_b LOCATION MAP
i 2000
ur, 1
,it7
~t e ~ A6, ~ ,yin i~N
,
i P r . ! ::r rl T_ orr.a, r,vmr.'77
14.
r
I
XNFORMATIONAL
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 161 1984
Alford absent
Z_1687
A, The Council Considered ado tion of an ordinatiae
approving a' change, in zoning from the s~nglo family (Sr-10 And
$F-14) zoning classi'fioations to the planned development (p,b)
c apaification on an e3,2 acre tract located on the 'east and west
s ides of Lillian Miller Parkway beginning approximately 10000 feet
south of Interstate Highway 359.
1 11
Denise Spivey
"'phis is An ordinN11611 e for a for the ~o~iinq °~case in the. ago Stgror
Soning date in Southr140 area thati You did approve in a
p~cstvioue> t►6etinq and i't's basically the teohiiical `"ttsr of adopting'
the ordinance. And I'll be Pleased to respond to any questions that
anyone might have.,,
Mayor Stewart asked if there were any questions.
AT THIS POINT. I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO PICK UP MUCH FROM THE TAPE.
THE FOLLOWING IS TAKLN PROM MY NOTES.
Council Member Stephens asked if the council was considering the
revised ordinance which had been distributed and asked the City
secretary if she had distributed the revisions at the work session.
Charlotte Allen, City Secretary, responded that she had distributed
thecopies of the revised ordinance to the Council Members in the
Council Chambers prior to the 7:00 meeting.
Council Member Stephens stated that the ordinance in the Council
back-up material did not track with the motion which was made.
Denise Spivey
"The tapes, as to what the intent was, I cannot specify from that
but the tape, the motion that was voted on Dr. Stephens wade the
motion for a detached, the areas west of 'Lillian Miller Parkway to
be dete'ohed and that was the particular motion that was voted on
according to the tapes.,,
Council Member McAdams stated that she remembered this petition very
well and the lengthy discussion about detached versus attached with
the finbes, garages and storage buildings.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that some were attached t.,
garages. etc. but looked detached.
i i.
r
_2_.'
Council Member Hopkins steed that the original presentation
included houses which could share a common garage,
Council Member Stephens stated that two changes had been made to the
original petition with his motion, The first was that the planned
development be changed to SIOw16 and sly--10 where that Zoning already
was in place. The second change was that the portion west of
Lillian Miller parkway be detached.
Council Moalbft McAdams Otatyd that 'the was not aware that was the
case and thought she had Voted on the petition as presented.
Hopkins notion, McAdams second to table the ordinance. Motion to
table carried a to x. Council Members MoAdaNs, Hopkins.
Hiddlssperger and `Mayor Stowrt voted aye to"table; Council members
Stephens and Chew cast the nay votes.
16400
0$471.
Y
1
No, TEXAS ~IAS S WAS IADDOP EA ASNAN APPENDIX p THE CO Er OF 0"1 ~ wcz NANCEA OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, VY'ORDINANOE NO, 69.1, AND
AS SAID NAP APPLIES TO $3,2 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE JOHN
MCGGWA14 SURVEY, O$TRACT NO. 797 DENTON COUNTY TEXAS AND
LOCATED ON THE EAST AND HEST SIDS OF LILLI HILLU PARKWAY
BEGINNING APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET SOUTH OF I STATE HIGHWAY
35E TO PROVIDE FOR, A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DES CNATtON FROM 'SINGLE FAMILY "SF-1011 AND "SF-16"' DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" CLASSIFICA-
TION AND USE FOR SAID PROP$RTYo AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI
SECTION L,
That the Zoning 'C144ai.Ei0akion and Use' dasignation appI i
cable to all or part of thR pro?arty described as 'tracts OOnn*,
Two, Three and Four in Exhibit 'All attaohod hereto and made a
art hereof for all pucposss is, hereby changed fxom Single
Family "S6'-10" and 1:0- 16" District C1ltesification and Use to
Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use under
the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas,
SECTION II,
That in approving this planned development district ordi-
nance, the City Council hereby approves a preliminary site plan
showing the general propose land uses within the district,
Prior to the issuance of any building permit for development
within the district or part thereof, a comprehensive site plan
shall be required to be submitted and approved as part of this
ordinance in accordance with Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning, of
the Code of Ordinances,
SECTION 1I1.,
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the comprehensive site plan attached hereto and
made a part herein for all purposes.
SECTION IV,
That prior to issuance of nny certificate of occupancy for
the use of any building, within the planned development district,
the following Eonditions shall be met!
1. The areas designated for single family "SF-10" and
single family "SP-1611 on the attached comprehensive
plan' will be developed in accordance with all
reqquirements of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas applicable
to districts so zoned.
2. All dwellings constructed and located in the area
designated for "single family attached" use in the
coo rehensiyip plan , attached hereto shall be so
die fined and .conitrunted;eo'that only the gerage ,
storage areas' or other similar accessory o6mp6honta
of the single 'family ,dwalling units are attached to
other single family dwelling units.
Z-1682/JO STORER/PACE 1
-7-77P~ 117
BUTTON V.
Tha the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive
plan for the purpose of promoting the eneral welfare of the
L'ity of Denton Texas, and with reasonable oonsidsration, among
other things It the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION VI.
That this ordinonoe shall be in full foroe and effect
immd4idtaly after its passage' and approval, the required public
hear ingd hsiving heretofore been held by °the 'Plapnins And Zoning
Commission and the 'City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984.
I
RIC%W o , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,oTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY;
Z-1682/JO STOKER/PAGE 2
I T'
-I T
#tp+rr.~~•
u~.1uN; ~iuu1'~Iiq~e ~rrn~w'~',►~;.
MOM 4*
F I E L D N O T E S
(S.F, DETACHLD)
All that certain 17.648 aore tract or parcel of land situated in the
John McGowan Survey, Abstract Number 7'97, Denton County, Texasl said
tract being more particularly described as folldwsc.
Beginning for the southwest corner of this tract at the southeast
right-of•way of Ridgeway Drive and the south line (extended East) of
South ridge II;
Thence North 20 degrees 49 minutes 03 aecoods,gast with said right-of-,#
a diatan,ca of 1153,57 feet to a point the northeast corner of this
tracts
Thence southeatterl wik~ a urve to tha Xeft'having a radius of
904,55 fe t~((chord' Iearing Scouth 76'dtgria' 14 minutes 31 seconds East)
a di'~tance of475.50 feet to and of curve]
Thence North 88 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 68.14
feet to a point, for the northeast corner of this tract;
Thence'South 02 degrees 04 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of
875.24 feet to a point, for the southeast corner of this tract;
Thence South 88 do roes 40 minutes 15 seconds West with said extender
south line of Southridge II a distance of 1112,70 feet to Point of
Beginning,
i
'k 13 77 ~ v„~'ael ~~TS~ T~'i~;•1 ! t r : ti"r1n~ ',`"fi". • 1 to s ~
MRTMW
(S-F, ATTACH L S OF $0 Oi1MZDGE DR.')
All that certain 4.460 acre tract or pparcal of land situated in the
John McGowan Survey, Abstract Number 7970 DoAton County, Texas; said
tract being more particularly described as fellows:
Beginning for the northeast corner of this tract at the intersection
of south ri ht-of-way Southridge Drive and the west right-of-way of
Ridgeway Drive;
ThiOce South 28 degrees 49 minutes 03 seconds West with said wist_
right-o£-wayy of Ridggaway Drive a distance ; of $93.27 fast to a corner
in the south line of Ridgeway II (extended East) for southsait corner
of this tract;
Thence South $0 degrees 40 minutes 12 seconds test with'said extended,
t south line a distance of 237.18 feet to the,sauGhAast corner of said
Southridge`II, for the southwest corr;er of this tract;
Thence with thesoutheast boundary line of said Southridge TI, the
following (6) calls,
North 35 degrees 18 minutes 08 seconds East 219.57 feet,
North '09 degrees 19 minutes 45 sec tyds West 250,00 feat,
North 55 degrees 06 minutes 39 seconds East 1,56.25 feet,
North 57 degre-s 50 minutes 28 seconds East 169.57 feet,
North 51 degrees'42 minutes 01 seconds East 200.34 feet and
North 37 degrees 26 minutes `56 seconds East 126.45 feet to
a point in said 'south right-of-way of Southridge Drive;
't'hence southeasterly with a cur'►e to the left having a radius of
330,00 feet (chord bearing South 59 degrees 54 minutes 34 seconds East)
and said right-of-way, a distance of 14,66 feet to and of curve;
Thence South 61 degrees 10 minutes 57 seconds East with said right-of-way
a distance of 71,64 feet to Point of Beginning,
r
Z-1682/EXHIBIT '4" AG 0 4
h. 4.2'
gdllth! x
P I E L D_ N O T Z 3
(8P-16)
All, that certain 5.052 acro tract or parcel of land si,tusted in the
John McGowan Survey, Abstract' Number 797, Denton. County, Texas; said
tract being more partic±xlarly described as fo11 ows ;
Beginnin for the northwest corner of this tract At the northwest
corner o Southpi,dga XI Addition, said corner is also an inside
all corner of Southridge Addition to the City of Denton;
Thence with the northwest boundary line of said Southridge It the
following (7) calls
South 69 degrees 58 minutes 28 seconds East 252,27 feet,
South.76 dogrees'45'minutes '28 seconds East 116070 Pest,
South,82 degrees 04 minutes 28 seconds East 115,13 feet,
North 86 degrees 56 minutes 32 seconds East 284487 feet,
North 69 degrees 52 minutes 25 seconds East 279,86 feet,
North:56 degrees 34 minutes 49 seconds East 253,63 feet, and
North 45 degrees 17 minutes 17 seconds East 132.63 feet to a
poiht in 'the 'south right-of way of Southridge Drive, for the
northeast corner of this tract;
Thence South 38 degrees 05 minutes 14 seconds East with said right
of way a distance of 1449.99 feet to a point, for the southeast corner
of this tract;
Thence South 50 degrees 37 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of
197.34 feet to the be LIning of a `curve to the right having a radius
of 1069.36 feet (chord Bearing south 65 degrees 13 minutes 35 seconds
West);
Thence southwesterly with said curve a distance of 545,00 feet, to
the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1225;'00
feet (chciv4d bearing North 85 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds West);
Thence northwesterly with said curve a distance of 628.37 feet to
etid of said curve
Thence North 70 degrees 47 minutes West a distance of 220,10 feet to
a point fov the southwest corner of this tract;
'T'hence North 24 degrees 05 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of
144.82 feet to Point of 3eginninkt.
Z-1682/EXHIBIT "All/PACE3 OF 4
i
IOU It
xE LD M0'Tg,g
W T 4 ATTACHED N'. OT SO't?TMIM M)
All that certain 5.211 *eve tract or excel of land situated in the
John MoG*van Survey, Abstract Number 797 Denton County, Texas;
said tract being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning for the southeast corder of this tract at the intersection
of the north right-of-way of southrid=e Drive and the west right-of-wa;
of Ridgeway Otive;
Thence North 61 de roes 10 minutes 37 seconds West with the north
right-of-way of said Southridge Drive 71.64 feet to the beginning
of a curve to the right;
Thence northwesterly with a curve to the right havi.ds a radius of
270,00 feet (chord bearing North 42 d•~r aos 25 mintutes 16 seconds
West), and said north right-of-way of 8authridge Drive a distance
of 176.82 feet to a point for end of curve;
'Thence North' 23 degrees 39 minutes 35 seconds West with said right
of way a distance of 78.10 feet;
Thence northwasterl,yy with a curve to the right having a radius of
553.04 feet (chord bearing North 25 degrees 56 minutes 45 seconds
West), and said right-of-way, a distance of 46.54 feet to the south..
west corner of this tract;
Thence North 50 degrees 37 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of
343.55 feet to an angle poirtt~o,f this tract;
Thence North 35 degrees 07 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of
350.82 feet to an angle point of this tract;
Thence North 10 degrees 18 minutes 59 seconds West a distance of
195.14 feet to the northwest corner of this tract;
Thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes ~l seconds East a distance of
215.07 feet to the said west right-of-way of Ridgeway Drive for
the northeast corner of this tract;
Thence South 00 degrees 30 minutes 27 seconds East with said right
of way a distance of 3.95 feet to the begi2ning_of a curve to the
right havingg a radius of 753.26 feet Wjor bearing south 13 degrees
39 minutes 24 seconds West);
Thence southwesterly with said curve a distance of 398.62 feet to
and of said curve;
Thence South 28 degrees 49 minutes 03 seconds West continuing with
said right-of-way a distance of 670.00 feet to Point of Beginning.
Z-1682/EXHIBIT "All/PAGE 4 OF 4
Y
.1 :'a1 .eS
GUNCE. 'r FLAN TADL
IIRI~iA ZLiN►~ p~iril T~
so, 2 SF 10 ICS tAA t L17
!Cl.G 5 Ida '3z I's 9.4 SF• Amman 4 0. Uom 4. 17.6 SF• oca'40&a 146 G,0..., t" t 4wo
w..,.. g, - 16 JUNE
o
U d
4` r
S . F, - 16
N
S . f . 10
r 'Q LOCATION MAP
Y,~,~. t` rv 1 zooo1
lu~
i i 1 l'f':",'^r- c-r*':'-^+s-+-..na'.^?.1^_^^•r-.r-^-,-:-..,q..-. n. ,i-,.. ,y
77777777-7
i
NO. _
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONI MAP OF TM MY Of DBNTON,
TEXAS AS SAME WAS IAFDOPTED AS A APPEENDIX TO '1'M CODE OF ORDT-
AS SAID W THE &0 83 2N, AONN Rx9 $f~f LYANODD$IIN'1~NCO, 69*1, AND
'T~RAA N TN$ JOHN
MCGOWA1 SURVEY, S CT N0. 797 D t " MD
LOCATE ON THE T AND WEST ID61S Of LI I'MAY
WINNING APPROATELY 1000 FEET SOV" 0 ITE HIOMWAY
3591 TO PROI'IDE FOR A C"2X IN fONINV CLASSIFIOATION AND USE
DESIGNATION FROM SIMOLE MILY '$F-lO'! AND "SF-16" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO KAMP WILOPMENT "P011 0,LAS$tFICA-
TION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND 3CLARIN0 AN 91MCTIVE (SATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTONit MW o HERENY ORDAINS;
SECTION 1.
That the Zoning Classification and Use,detignattoti tip li-
0001e to all or part of, th%~ protorty, das Tracts -One,
Two, Three and Four in Zxhibit 'A" 0;¢4014d hereto and made a
part hereof' for all purpoaae" is hereby chanted from single
Family "SP-10" and "Sp-16" District Classification and Us* to
planned Development "PD" District Classification rind Use under
the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
That in approving this planned development district ordi-
nanaa, the City Council hereby approves a preliminary site plan
showing the general proposed land uses within the district.
Prior to the issuance of my building permit for development
within the district or part 'thereof, a comprehensive site plan
shall be reyuirad to be submitted and approved as part of this
ordinance in accordance with Article 11, Appendix a-Zoning, of
the Code of Ordinances.
SECTION 111.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the comprehensive site plan attached hereto and
wade a part herein for all purposas.
SECTION IV,
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for
the use of any building within the planned development district,
the following oonditions shall be met:
1. The areas designated for singl.a family "SP-16" on
the attached comprehensive plan will be developed
in accordance with all 'requirements of App.radix
N-zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas applicable to districts so zoned.
2. All dwellin s located. in the area designated as
"single family detached" shall be derf``ned and
constructed for occupancy by coo family and located
on a lot or separate building tract so as to have
no physical connection to A building located on any
other lot or tract and occupied by on* family.
Z-1682/JO STOKER/PAGE 1
i
77
7-77 7~7'
6
SECTION V~
Than the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hes.,eby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehenaive
plan for this purpose of promoting the moral welfare of the
City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration **ong
other things for the character of the district and For its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human livws,
and encouraging the most a propriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens,
SECTION VI.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immodiaxely after ttl passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore boon held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984.
KLUKA"
CITY OF DWON, TEXASxTUR
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTONO~TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
JOE D. MORRIS) ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: Al,
Z-16b2/JO STOIRR PAGE 2
,i t~' ~ as +
sir •k„-.
i
f
GUAICurr PLAN TAOLS
ARt'/1 2~M[ J7WAJtY ~ .
S .d S~ • IF
9.4 %f-400town 40 Wi4 4.3
17, 6 M ar 106 4.41 ' : } 1" • gyp.
J
JUMC "of"*
tia~ ~ I
I ~ y d ~t'r
N a .
4
by
Single Family
o0
Mcay4rm
.i e , a'~ .'~y, rn' 'v', •t
A.A
1~ 14Mf fIW1,`,~ Vhly~ %01 V, ,wMW IWw • ` Nr,I) ~J461* 91V%
111~t~t1ffYY ~w1t
I I > ° t
Mr, OXTA cM)
All that certain 17,646 aorli treat or ppateal of lade situated in the
John McGowan Survey, AbstrsjEt Nuaber IM Aen on County, Texas, said
tract being acre particularly de eribed as to lows
rlodht»~)tSw oyrof RidSewayeUr~,va and thetSouthrlinaa(extendedtEast) of
Southridge II;
Thence North 28 degrees 49 minutes 03 eooonds East with said ri ht-of-way
a distance of 1153,37 feet to a point the northeast corner of this
tract;
Than** southeasterly with 4 curve to the lot't having a radius of
904,55 feet chord boarino South 76 dagteer, 14 minutes 31 Seconds East)
a distance of 475,30 feet to and of curvet
Thence North 88 degree 41 minutes 55 aeeor, s test a distance of 68.14
foot to a roint, for the northoast corner ol.thts treat;
Thence South 02 degrees 04 minutes 25 oeacttd,' distance of
875,24 foot to a point, for the Southeast ok„ !+'s' hf this tract;
Thence 'South 61 de ro4es 40 mNlos i5 sadond' 'a sith slid extended
south line of"Soutnrtdge It a distance of 1112 YTfoot to point of
Beginning.
i
2=1682/EXHXDIT "A"/PAGE 1 Or 4
L 1,,L
M7 7
, 5 5 '•;4{~ ' ' V'' r i`e i'i dl " {V , e , , 1 ,
Y~
77
i4► N1MIf wilA64
0I Y.
DR~~ Old,)
I,
~11 ClH4 oestain 4,440 cord trt or 7 l7, R ON YO f lac! oitw►ted in the.
obn Nb GOW'Surv#Y0 of r t IkaN4e County, Texas, said
tract b*to$ More porticulorly deeoTM Ma llewaI
or kmaingrf torCthe northeast corner of thi tract at the intersection
south Ridgeway or1ve, way xouthridge !!rive a the we at right-of•way of
Thrtt0 South 24 de r*es 49 stinuts : 01 ssoonds !lest with said`w4at.
rig Lof•wa of Riltspray DIrivs a ~ etaboo of /93,27 fast to a corner
in the south line oR Ridgeway 11 (extended !fast) for southeast corner
of this tract,
Thence South '86 degroes 40 minutes, 12 seconds West with said axtonded,
south line a distance of 237,16 fast to the southeast corner of said
Southridgs 11, for the southwest corner of this tract,
Thence witty the southeast boundary line of said Southridgis it, the
followins (6) 041161
North 3S degree 18 minutes 0$ oioonds fast 219,S1 feet,
I 1,
With 09 468raa It ai} ►utea 4 a"
Met 50;00 foot,
North SS degrees'06 a~ toe 3 ii"00 usk„~Sb 25 foot,
North 57 do xe•s SO • tdi 2 sic., a" Fast 1¢¢9~ est,
North 51 de Tees 42 *W*Atee 0 sec s Last' 00.11 !set end
North 37 degree 26 minutes S6'•eoon s at 26, $ feet to
a point in said south right-of-way of'Southrid;e Dvivs,
Thence southeasterly with a curvy to the loft hxvin a radius of
330;00 feat (chord baarin South $9 dattroes 54'minutso 34 seconds East)
and said right-of-way, a ~istance of 14,66 feet cc and of curve,
Thence South 61 da`ree• 10 minutes 37 ascends beat with said might-of-way
a distance of 71,64 fact to Point of beginning,
z-1682/LUIDIT "A"/PACE 2 or 4
'r , ` s, ,,gin:
1 ~ ,I .t'yr
, Sowtluf~~ ~ X x
rIIL°a or:g
(SVI)
All that corxain 5.02 acts troat or, tool of 3 d arcuated in the
John NoOowat< Survey, Abstract liM►ex 1117, Dootoo County, Texas; said
tract being more particularly aaribod as follower
Seginnin for the northwest torpor of We tract aq the northwest
oorner of Souchriddj~e it Adi ion, said corner is also an inside
all corner of SouthridSo Add tion to the City of Deaton;
Thencewit(7)ho northwest boundary line of said Southridso 11 the
South 69 delras 50 minutes 21 sac, s last 252, 2i feet,
South 16 !$$rose 45 otootoo 2I tooogds lost LIC7 fa»t,
south 2 o;rsee 04 alinutes seconhest 15,3foot,
North 86 delrase $6 +ai~s"uses RA40 second: toot 264.07 foot,
North 69 ddelroas 52 minutes ~a task 279,06 foot,
North 56 degrees 34 miputss 49 ssaopda toot 2SL 63 fret, and
North 43 degrees 11 mihutet 17 seaon'a Ust 132,63 feat to a
point in the south righi-of way of Southridgo Drive, for the
northeast corner of this traott
Thence South 30 degrols'05 minutes 14 seconds last with ssid right
of W* a distance of 144.99 fat to a point, for the southeast corner
of this tract;
Thence South 50 degrees 37 minutes 33 seconds west a distance of
197,34 foot to the be train of a ourvo to the ri ht haviag a radius
of 1069.36 foot (ehor bear ng South 65 degrees l adnutos 33 seconds
West);
Thancs southwesterly with said curve a distance of 545.00 fe.t to
that beginning of a curve to the right aving a radius of 1225.00
foot (chord bearing North 85 degrees 29 minutes 42 seconds West);
Thance northwesterly vith said curve a distance of 628.37 feet to
end of said ourvsl
Thence North 70 degrees 47 minutes West a distance of 220.10 feet to
a point for tht southwest corner of this tract;
Thence North 24 degrees 05 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of
144,82 foot to Point of 8oginning,
Z-1682/EUIHIT I'A"/PAGE 3 OF 4
T.7 t LP" fi; ''1 Q 1 F 1Aj 'r :I. ^'"Gi 1'Y f4 iMI 1 ^I lr. 7' V'
0*140 •A
($IF, 0XITAUM Ht of 1144104 a.)
All that certain 5,211 #as"o treat or •roo of land situated in the
John HoGowain survey, Abstract Nu~A.r 97 tan County, Texas;
said treat being more particularly deaorioed as follows
Betrinsiini for the southeast corner of this tract at the inttrsactton
of the north right-of-vay of Southridge Drive and the west right-or•wny
of Ridgeway Drivel
Thetlos North 61 do room 40 minutes 67 a aonds West with tho norO
right-of•way of ea1d 8outhridg6 Drive 71,64 feet to the beginning
of a curve to the righti
Thence northwesterlTv t h A curv« o the rig t hevt t a radius of
210,00 feet (sherd Si North '4 ds ees 5 minutes 16 seconds
Walt) and said norrit»of»wsy of louthridge Drive a distance
of 17+,82 feet to a int for and of curvol
Thence North 23'4egrses 39 minutes 35 seconds west with sold right
of way a distance of 18,10 fast;
'Chance northwesterly with a curve to the ritbt having a radius of
583,04 feet (Qhord`bear'i;ng North 23 degrees 56 minutes 45 seconds
West), and said .ri8ht-of-waY, e distance of 46.$4 feet to the south-
vast corner of tihts tract;
Thence North 50 degroae 37:minutee 33 seconds test s distance of
343,55 fiat to an Angle point of this tract,
Thence North 35 degrees 07 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of
350,82 feet to an angle po'ipt of this traoti
',hence North 10 degrees 18 minutes 39 sodonds'West a distance of
195,14 feet to the northwest corner of this tract;
Thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds East a distances of
215,07 feet to the said ue!t right-of-way of Ridgeway Drive for
the northeast corner if this traot;
Thence South 00 degrees 30 minutes 27 eedot%ds Fast with said rigght
of way a distance of 3,95 fees to the beginning of a curve to tha
right having a radius of 753,26 foot (chord bearing South 13 degrees
39 minutes 24 seconds West);
Thence southwesterly with said curve a distance of 398,62 feet to
end of sold curve;
Thence South 20 degrees 49 minut e'03 seconds West continuing with
Bald right-of-way a distance of :70.00 feet to Point of Beginning.
2-1682/EXHIBIT "A"/PAGE 4 OF 4