HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-02-1984
C 1 T1~ COUNCI t
A 6ENAA
10-0~.-~1 y
37. r 77" 77,p~? 7w 41
AGENW►
CITY OF pENTON CITY'COUNCYL
October 2, 1984
Work Sessio f the City of Denton City Council on Tuesdayp,
Octi 1' 9$4 at 5:30 which i htehe follil,Defe so Roo of tbaa
un a pa BuilAng at
consideredt
5:30 p.m.
11 Tour of the renovated west wing, both Phase I and II.
2. Discussion of the proposed sign ordinance.
30 Discussion of the realignment of bell Altenue.
4. llecmive a report on the water treatment plant
4.; expansion study.
5. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
V.J1.'T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f)., Art. 625217
V.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S.~
DI Board Appointments Under Soc. ?.(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
October 2, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of July 17, 1984.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff And
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorises the City MaoAger or, his designee to
implement each item in sedordanre with the Staff
recommendations.
~
,
Dedtgll City GOUncil 44en4e
4atlsber 2, 1~~4
Uge Two
A. Vida and Purchase Orders:
11 Did N 9342 • Street and water line
improversents for landfill
29 Bid N 9346 » Mobile radios
36 Purchase Order N 64764 to P. A. !lose
Machinery in the amount of 33,551.73
4, Purchase Order N 64930 to Dolain Equipment
Inc. in the amount of $3,18704
50 Purchase.9rder # 64985 to Calvert Motor Co.
in the amount of $3,217.77
61 Purchase Order f 65064 to Art4ur &idersen
and`Co, in'the amount of $40000400
7. Purchase Order M 65208 to Consolidated
Traffic Control in the amount of $10,780.00
S. Plats and lteplats
1. Consider- approval of the final r*01,at of the
Bent Oaks Addition. (The Plarfoing and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
lot 1, block 1, Calvert Addition. (The
planningg
approval and Zoning Commission recommends
3. Consider approval of thq preliminary replat
of lot 2A, block 20, College Addition. (The
Plannin and Zoning Commission rocow"nds
approval.)
4. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
North Toxas Industrial Pork, Phase II, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
51 Coii'sider approval of the preliminary plat of
lots 1 and 20 block 1, Rayner Subdivision.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
64 Consider a grovel of the final replat of the
Solar Way kddition,`Sectio'ni I and II. (The
r Planning and Zoning Commission recom ands
approval,.)
' ns '~'""`fi'r F'ge-`SR+",~y~z~: ~iYTrss~W?5",+.7'.? !"rri+-,i pmt' ~grpec'"vk~ y`-h^r«r.++:^yary?d'Gnw*, peel-., *f ,
Ciit~ 0~ >yetltOn ClCy C4Vit~0i,1 Ag~iada
October 2,084
Page Three
C. Tax Refundat
1. Consider approval of a to refund to Edith
5. Tucker in the amount of 641.10,
31 Public Hearinss:
A. Z-1687. This is the petition of Harvey A,
Thompson reyuastin a changw in *orning from the
si le famil (SP-10)' c ssstficetton to the
planned development (PD) classifioation on nn
18.1 acre trac boatd at the noxthh~ st corner
of University ~riw (l,S. Highway 380 and Old
North Road. It approved, the planned development
will permit the following land uses:
104 &,o"s - nei*hborhood service land use
240 aor*$ • proposed park
6.5 acres - offles/virohooo use
5.4 acres - condo-clustor houAing, 65 units
with a density of 12 units per acre
2.8 acres - zero lot line land use, 22 units
with a density 6t7,9 units per acre 1
(The planning and honing Commission recommends denial.)
B. Zw1688, This is the petition of W. H. Smith
ryq~lues .ray
reting a change in Oning from agricultural
(A) to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 52.9 acre parcel located at
the southwest corner of Bonnie Brae Street and
Payne Drive. If Opproved the planned
development (PD) will permit the following land
uses:
6.3 acre#.of neighborhood service land use
10.0 acres,, of single family detached knnd use
• minimum lot sise''of 7 000 squaro feet
11.6 acres of zero lot'line land use
- density `of ` 7.2 units per acre
10.0 acres .of malti-fisily land use
• denr<ity 'of 12 units for acre
14.9 acre's of multi-family land use
- density of 22 units per acre
(The Planning' and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approvin
a change' in zoning from the agricultural
to `Ohe planned development (PD)
claariiff6ation bn a 52.9 acre parcel located
at the southwest corner of Bonnie Brae
Street and Payne Drive.
i
I
7711
r
Oily of Denton City Council Agenda
~ctobot 2, 1984
are your
C. Z,_oI68Q. Thts is the petition of Joe Evans
r q o sting a cnenge in ;toning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
devIolopmont (PD) classification on a 20.3 acre
tract located on the east side of Nash Branch
Road approximately 583 feet south of t19 S.
Highway 380. If approved, tha planned
development would permit light industrial (LI)
land use. (Thee Planning and Zoning Commission
recos►wends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approvn
a change in zoning from the Agricultural
classification to the planned development
(Pb) classification on a 20.3 acre tract
located on' the east side of Masch branch
RoA4 approxieaately 383 feet south of U. S.
Highway 360.
0. 5-181. This is the petition of Sigma Tau Gamin
Fraternity r0uesting a specific use permit to
. opperate • fVoteraity. in an Office (0), soning
district .,,at the northwest corner of West Oak
Street and 'Fry Stroet. The 'property is more
Me described as 1302 West Oak Street.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval)
11 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
a specific use ermir to operate a
fraternity in an office 0) zoning district
at 1302 West Oak Street.
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
requast, for a change in.zoning fror the
ricuit'ural (A) classi> icatit~p to the planned
3ve1oprmont (PD) oisasiftd,utri^n for light
indurrtrial (LY) ones. on a A30.6 acre tract
located at the southeast corner of ' Jim Christal
Road and Masch' Sretndh Road. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recomends aproval.)
B. Consider -adoption of an ordinance approvingg net
Independent Contractor's Agreement with Jerry
Wright$ Space Planner, gor Phase III of
Renovation Project.
C. Consider adoption of an 'ordinance "approving an
Independent 'Contractor's Agreement with Jerry
Frederick, Construction Superintendent, for Phase
III of Renovation Pro.iect.
j
.•,,..,,."p'°. f "d i'~a'~° r-a'^^rc'LT ~`'C. a9' d!`s°r ~"m:
~w F1 ? l i 7 ru . .`A 2J 4'T'R' y i '^P"7!Rf~" ^.ilu
i r' 'Y L y S
l f
C#Cy 4x Aeakda City Council Agenda
~October 2, 1464
rage five
D, Consider dAd option of an ordinance w proving an
I14ep46dent Contractor's Agreedent with Richard
Cooper, Mechanical' Engineer, for Phase III of
Renovation Projeot.
9. Consider adoption of an ordinance getting
inspection and permit fees as provided for by
i' Article 1, Chapter 10 of the ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas; repealing all ordinances
in conflict.
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
quit claiming an unused easement on property
northeast of 1-35 and Prairie Street (near
proposed Hill Run apartments). (The Public
Utilities Board recomo nds approval.)
i 04 Consider adoption of an 'ordinance approving a
i contract with Freese and Nis olsp Inc. or master
pplan 'update for sewer collection system. (The
Public Utilities' Board recommends approval.)
H. consider adoption of an, ordinance ap~roving a
contract with Proese and Richois, Inc. or Denton
water.treatment plant expansion site study. (The
Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
S. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution establishing
out-of-city Library fees. (The Library Board
recommends approval.)
6. Receive a report on proposed 1984 electric, water/
wastewater rate changes.
7. Consider approval of a request for'water/sever service
outside Denton city limmits'by Jay-Mar Addition, Lot 1,
Block 1.
8. Consider approval to provide water/sewer service to
Denton County North Mobile Subdivision and Denton
County South Mobile' Subdivision on FAst McKinney
Street adjacent to Vacation 'Village Estates. (The
Public Utilities Baird recommends approval.)
y. Offi,yial Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. "!teal gstate
C. Personnel
D. Board'Appointments
e, I~w*, ~y°TP,."i z ~R{4 . 7C'p `*F",~.... ~'•y a. ~9 m l'?: ~ ~ p m hn: _
i
city. a! ftotoa city 'COUauil Ajorwe
I 00tobor 2V 194
a ix
f,
104 Now b~lainoss:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
•ug8ost items for future *Sondas.
C E R T I F L c A'r E
1 certify that the above notice of meeting woo posted on' the:
bull,otia board at the Cit Na11 of the City o Dontaa, Texas$
on the dIft ♦k- day of 1984 at o'clock
A -w
W4 0-7
1509C
d
AQF.iDA
CITY OF D&N'ON CITY COUNCIL
October 2, 1984
Work Session f the City of Denton City Council on ;ruesday,
ct otr f , 084 at 500 p,M in the C vil Defe se Room of the
un c pa Building at w~hic~ the following iteaaa will be
considered:
5:30 p.m,
11 Tour of the renovated west wing, both Phase I and II.
2. Discussion of the proposed sign ordinance.
3. Discussion of the realignment of Bell Avenue.
4. Receive n report on the water treatment plant
expansion study.
51 Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 625217 j
V.~I,T.S.
B, Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17
V,A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V,A,T.S,
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 V.A.TPS,
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council an Tuesday,
October 20 1984 at 7:00'r p.m. in the Council Chambers, of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
11 Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of July 17, 1984.
2. Consent Age6d4:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommondations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
a-ithorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in sccordence with the, Staff
recomendations.
.`77 ' ' ,ay'T+e'.n*.r.Fn ' T ^*,.+m~',yq! jk „a
77 177
City of Dootoa'City Council Agenda
Ootobor 21 1964
Page Two
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;
1, Bid N 9342 - Street and water line
improvements for landfill
20 Bid M 9346 - Mobile radios
3. Purchase Order N 64764 to P, A. Ross
Machinery in the amount of $3,551.73
4, Purchase Order M 64930 to Bolain Equipment
Inc, in the amount of $39187,04
5. Purchase Orde- # 64985 to Calvert Motor Co,
in the amount of $3,217.77
60 Puroh'dse Order 0 65064 to Arthur Andereon
and C+~, in the amount of $4,000.00
70 Purchase Order 0 65208 to Consolidated
Traffic Control in the amount of $10,780,00
B. Plata,and Renlats: i
11 Consider approval of the final replat of the
Bent Oaks Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
2, Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
lot 1, block 11 Calvert Addition. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
3, Consider approval of the preliminary replat
of lot 2A, block 20, College Addition. (The
P14nning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
4. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of
North 'Texas Industrial Park, Phase II, (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
5. Consider approval. of the preliminary plat of
lots 1 and 29 block 1, Rayner Subdivision.
(The Planning ` and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
6. Consider appproval of the final replat of the
Solar Way Addition, Sections I and 11. ('The
PlanniLn and Zoning Commiasion recommends
approval.)
Y;
'..31 A1.,
J
city of Dentop City Council Asenda
October 2, 1984
" ?age Three
C, Tax Refunds:
s' 11 Consider approval of a tax refund to Edith
8, Tucker in the amount of $641,10.
3. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1687, This is the 'petition of Harvey A.
Th-o-m son requesting a change in zoning from the
singe family (Sr-10) classification to the
planned development (PD) classification on an
IN acre tract located at the nort}1past corner
of University Drive (U-S, Highway 380) and Old
North Road. It approved, the planned development
will porait the following land uses:
1.4 acres - neighborhood service "land use i
2.0 aores - pro osed park
6.S acres - offtes/wareho'use use.
5.4 acres - condo-oluster housing, 65 units
with a density of 12 units per acre
2,8 acres - zero lot line land use, 22 units
with a density"of 7.9 units per acre
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial.)
B. Z-1688. This is the petition of W. H. Smith
requesting a change in zoning from agricultural
(A) to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 52,9 acre parcel located at
the southwest corner of Bonnie Braes Str,+et and
Payne Drivn, If approved, the planned
development (PD) will permit the following land
uses:
6,3 acres of neighborhood service land use
10.0 acres of single family deCached land use
- minimum lot size of 7•'400 square feet
11.6 ores of zero lot line land use
density of 7.2 units per acre
10.0 acres of multi-family land use
- density of 12 units per adre
14,9 acres of aultiffaaily lot use
- density of 22 units per acre
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approvin
a change in zoning from the agricultural
j to the p anned development (PD)
classification on a 5249 acre parcel located
at the southwest corner of Bonnie Brae
Street and Payne Drive,
^J4
9 ~ : i ` ail ~
y
L t. + 1'^'i .qP,F ass f lvr '~:^'1!Yi'A'
77 7 777P7 7~1 73
City of Denton City Council Agenda
' October 20 1984
Page Four
C. Z016890 . This is the petition of Joe Evans
w. w1Y1M M Vrequestiing a change in zoning from tho
agricukCUral (A) classification to the planned
development (PD) classification on a 20.3 sore
tract located on the east side of Masch branch
Road approximately 583 foot south of U, S,
Highway 380, If approved, the planned
development would permit light industrial (LI)
land use, (The Planning and ''Zoning Commission
recommerniti approval,)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approvin
a chants in moning from the agricultural (Al
classification to the planned development
(PD) classification on a 20.3 acre tract
located on the east aide of Masch branch
Rand Approximately 583 feet south of U. S.
Highway 380, ,
D, S-181, This is the petition of Sigma Tau Gamma
rraternity requesting a specific use permit to
o erote a fraternity in an office (0) zoning
district 'at the northwest corner of West 'Oak
Street and Fry Street. The'`~property is more
partioulsrly described as 1302 Vest Oak Street,
(The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
14 Consider adoption of an ordinance approving
a apeaific use permit to operate e
fraternity in an office (0) zoning district
at 1302 West Oak Street.
4. Ordinancest
A, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
request for a change in toning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development (PD) classification for light
industrial (LI) uses on a 130.6 acre tract
located &It tho southeast 'corner of Jim Christal
" Road and'Masch Branch [toad. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends aproval'.)
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
Independent Contractor's Agreemeat with Jerry
Wright, Space Planner, ffor Phase III of
Renovation Project.
C. Consider adoption of an. ordinance approving an
Independent Contractor's Agreement with Jerry
Frederick, Construction Superintendent, for Phase
III of Renovation Project,
City of Dent*k City Council Agenda
October 2, 1184
Pose Five
D, Consider adoptiors of an ordinance approving an
Independent Contractor's Agreement with Richard
Cooper, Mechanical Engineer, for Phase III of
Renovation Project.
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting
inspection and permit tees as provided for by
Article 11 'Chapter 10 of the ordinances of the
City of Denton, Texas, repealing all ordinances
in conflict.
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and
quit claiming an unused easement on property
northeast of I-35 and Prairie Street (near
propposed Mill Run apartments). ('The Public
Utilities Board recommends approval.)
Cis Consider adoption of an %dinanae approving a
contract with !'reeso and Nic ols, Ines ffor master
plan 'u date for sewer collection`, system. (The
Public Utilities board recommends approvals)
H. Consider .adoption of an ordinance ap roving ;a
contract with Freese and liohols, Inc. or Denton
water treatment plant expansion site study. (The
Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
5. Resolutions:
As Consider approval of a resolution establishing
out«of-city Library fees. (The Library Hoard
recommends approval.)
6. Receive a report on proposed 1984 electric, water/
wastewater rate changes.
7. Consider approval of a request for water/sewer service
outside Denton city limits by Jay-Mar Addition, lot 1,
Block 1.
81 Consider approval to provide water/sewer service to
Denton County North Mobile Subdivision and Denton
county South Mobile Subdivision on East McKinney
Street adjacent to Vacation Village. Estates. (The
Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
9. Official Action on Executive Session Items;
A. Legal Matters
g. Real Estate
C. Personnel:
D. Board Appointments
r
IF
1
; e
C Cy of Den,toa City Council Agenda
+v 01 tob r 2o 19 i
Aare Six'
z 10.
Now business;
`t. This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
f
pr
C E R T IF I C A T E
yIL
'I I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the Cit Hall of the City o Denton, Texae,
$I; on the t4~- day of 1984 at o'clock
t
f-
Y.r
1509C
t. yy }
y .i tM, t It!' l.Va 5 3' ~S
7
qM]M
1
August it 1984
To The Members of the City Council
Denton, Texas
Dear Council Member,
Thank you for allowing input in the drafting of a
new akin ordin"ce for the City of Denton.
A* you requested in the last study session, you will
find a list of recommendations for the proposed sign
ordinsaae.
If I cam, answer s questions about my suggestions,
t , please feel' free to contact aye.
r Since C i Rodirg 1
Reding Advertising, Inc.
CR/pr
Enclosure
~a
7
5 ;7:r
PRO~Oa~a S ION =%NAN= CRAM
I• Paq g, Section C. PORTA= SIGNS, No. 2 &Shop ps
In"&& PertA a s : -md
Change 25 sqo feet to 32 oqo ft*
Page 10, Section' C O PdRTAMJ SIGNS, No. 3 Rliuhtien of Of t-
Prmgl Portable able Six".
(a) No Wait should be sails on o i f,promi se
~n~a gns are placed correctly (is, spacing,
aet-bank, height etc.) they should be governed just
like all other ;1SUS.
(b) AM"t• OMIT
Pap 10, Section Co. PMA= S14NS, No. 4 g3i 6
Cosplotely orit this sec ont why
oaw a ""Um o ras speech?
II. Page 10, Section D. RY40LATIO14 Or SIGNS BY ZONING DISTRICTS.
1. PA,IJ, . Why prohibit portable signs in
1~~`or like,spor eat zohin8m?
Page 11, , (e) dlr. (2) Chance 4501 to 100t,6
Page 11, N0. 2 1fdn-$„i t ( b)
No sign$ which is not a roof sign, s ai hs?s a e gbt.
greater than 40 feet, axcept along Interstate 35 where the
maximum height may be 60 feet.
page 12, Yo. ,3 Planned nerelanment District.
Planned ;Developoent areas should not get special treatment!
They should Piave to comply with all other zoning sign laws.
Planning & Zoning should not be allowed to write'their own
sign ordinance for each property,
Page 139 •No. 2 . (b) Projection'BerenQf.
Why not write this section Suglish so that someone oau
understand-it? -
f
Page . Wbat about' A
wosn341 Nx~ $3 Painted sign 7 (aCould you no t 'use this typo 'o f
sign on a wall? If so, why can you not use woodon blocks to
attach sign?
T`11 , T't 717 % t' i ' ~'#t+y.'~7~'ie^r +~rncr r TFq' 3f 6 P
t11} ~r N be
o oar issue urn +~Ve
Pat's of at a Pub 3o elootiou a an 3Z square test, $to.
M Pap 19 * Soo tion K. I~MW 0FTWWMw, Stan, Noe 4 X04
All 1484117 aor.~a0 1o0bd sips Which become
S#
qo o to S as renal of his ordiAane ahaI3 be
owd to roadze ~rr lepl nonaonformin p which
becomes da~aged or d•Stro~~ed in 0=404 of Woe its ralq,
shall be reabvede Any illegal or abandoned sign shall
be removed.
V. Page 21, Section J. MS"XAL LAMMARK SIM*
We need sore information as to what makes a sign historicalt
Siss, dolor, setback, age, prioel
Pap 23, t4 a sg, , 0e
Setback should be as follows:
AsUllak fa
20 -150 ~ '
Over 200" 251
UST RMAW t
City of Denton should create a Sign Code Board to heap
make judgment calls for building official. This board would
also be a sounding board for any citizen that had special
complications concerning sign placsm*ntse This board would dire
our city a chance to operate in an unbiest logical governing body.
Thera would be many advantages for the City of Denton's Staff,
i
members of the sign industry, And the businesses of Denton to j
have a Sign Code Board made up of local citizens and sign
industry members. A Sign Code Board would help in drafting stew
sign regulations just like the Building Code Board operates for II
the building official. Also a`Sign Code Board would be an 1
appeal board for citizens who disagree with building official's
dsalsiot * as to deterioration of old Apal' safety, ;fire, or'
health hazards.
7?
'f 7 717, •f p~
7T
Saa*stionS 'tram Mr's SlAck $440%
;Am, evil, we
1
t / tl Oro
11 to
74 d"
44 /
lop
p
how
74 A
100,12
/ U A
11011
N,
o
d ,y
loo
4,~j 0~ /,/Oo*
7;i Oe4al /A,
n. b
c ~~r '7• ~ ?:r, r ;p n5w! F aP+' , tY ~ k t = t ¢ 1'T"~t 1°< tU~-' 'S1" *!R'-,~ `F ~ , a
i In
C.+t. ~b ~f'~/ S•~ O~J 1 7~+w Cl /1K.~" 1.,
W-4~•;.~( A.
~ ~ i S RT o ~J o ~ ~ ~ ¢ , o~'C ~O ~t ~N` ,l~.y+/t,~.,, ,•c,
1 Z ~ .ft ..ytr aL vv
ook~
Ol
40
°
,I
1
J~
J.
o
r ' i + 1 1 Y+,.
V1, I
WAYT 110, 7 Aft2I, 90, M4
e
NO.
VIS O"INANCZ UTINQ 70 I SIGNS AM gT1 CTIVQ A N17 &W r~ 1R1'IC 17ROf
D 4ilx CLXA;NT4 1~ItQY~OpVT" =a ' FOR ilr RCQUI~AINTIN OTFSItIS CITY OF
AMR+IR
UM
9DD DOLLA~RSS 020000? p f0 VIOTIONS4'YFttil OF` POV p
LDINO ra
~ $ZVEkADILITY TUSE~ REPEALING ALL OMINANCES IN COMPLICT
Tn EOF; AND PROVI IWO FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds that
the regulation of the sine, location, height, uee, maintenance,
construction and placement of signs and other outdoor advertising
devices and structures is necessary to prevent impediments and
danjers to drivers and pedestrisas upon and along City streets,
sidevalkw and easements; and
ALMS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds that
the, use of signs and other outdoor advertising devices and
structures, if unregulated, csn, because of their nuaber,
placement, and characteristics, adversely affect proparty values;
aesthetically damage the overall environment; create as
unfavorable business climate which hampers attempts to attract
and retain desirable commercial and business enterprises; and
foster conditions that lessen the enjoyment and desirability of
the City of Denton as a place in which to -'isit, live and work;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds that
portable or mobile signs present spacial traffic hazards when
towed on public streets or displayed on or along public right-
of.-ways; act as impediments to the effectivenegl of the police
and fire departments in performing their duties; present dangers
to the health, safety and general ualf&r* of the citizens of the
City of Denton because of their mobility, their propensity to ba
blown about if not properly anchored, and, if, light.d, present
special hazards of electrical use not found in other ci%ns; and
WHEREAS, Texas Revised Civil Statute Article 117$ (24)
specifically aiwmerates as one of the powers possessed by the
t
PACE 1
7,",7 Ar : x 'f'' r
'F
r
City of Denton is the authority to regulate, license and control
or p;°ohiblt the erection of signs and billboards{
NOV, TNQt1MP T11C COUNCIL OF TILE' CITY Of DENTON KMUY ORDAINS
That Article 17 of Appendix I-Zoning of the Code cf Ovdi-
nanoes of the City of Denton is hereby in all things repealed,
SECTION 41.
That a new Article 17 <,f Appendix I-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinanooa of the City of Denton is hereby adopted to hereafter
read as follower
ARTICLE 17, SIGN MULATIONS
A. General Provisions
1. Purpose L Intent
2. Definitions
3, Signs Not Regulated
4, Prohibited' Signs
S, Administration L Enforcement i
b; Permits
C, Portable Signs
D, Regulation of Signs by Zoning Districts
E, Regulation of Attached Signs
1. Abandoned Signs
G. Special Provisions
1. Manner of Measurement
2. Setback Clearance. Zone
3. Signs on Certain Highways
4. Clearance from Electrical Lines
S, Temporary FA Political Signs
6, Sign Maintenance
7, Identification of Signs
H.' Nonconforming Signs
1. Special Exceptions Allowed
Historical Landmark Signs
K. Conflicting Provisions
A, GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Purpose and Intent. It is the purpose of this Article to
regulate the construction, erection, placement, maintenance, use
and removal of private signs 'within the City of Denton, Tawas,
PAGE 2
74W 'i:,77+ ' 'TW4 ^K`r*.ry'ic a
73,
5
It is the intent of this Article to regulate signs generally
by classifying each sign a<cordtag to its design and construction
and by regulating, based on such clossificatioa, the type,
number, size, height and setback of stint according to location
in'the various soniag districts.
It is also the intent and determination of the City Council
that these regulations be and are the minimum necessary and least
burdensome to accomplish the purposes heretofore stated,
2. Definitions, The following words, as used in this Article
or Article 7, shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to
thou, as follows r
(a) "A,dnertisia " shall neap to sack kkhe attraction of or
to direct tie attention of the pub to to nay location,
goods, sorvicas, or merchandise whatsoever.
(b) "gusiaess Purposes" shall "an the erection or use of
any pro erty, building, or structure permanent or
tasporE4 for the pr, ry purpose of oonductiag is
said building or structure or on swid property a
le itiaate ooswrei4 enterprise in ocfippliance with
al ordinances and regulations of the C ky of Denton
`overaiag;such activity. business purpose shall not
include any property, building, or structure *rooted
or used for the primary purpose of securing a permit
to erect a sign,
(c) "Curb lire" shall mean as imaginary line drawn along
the outermost part or back of the curb and Sutter on
zither aids of public street, or if no curb and
gutter exist, along the outermost portion of the
pavements or, if no pavement exist, along the edge of
the traveled portion of the roadway,
(d) "Effective area" means the area enclosed by the
minimum imaginary rectangle or vertical and horizontal
lines which fully contains all extremities of a sign
((or signs), exc wive of its Su2pporting structure,
Thin rootangl• is to be calculated from an orthographic
projaation of the sign viewed h0r12ontally. ' A viorw~
point for this, projection is to be taken which giv#s
the largest rectangle of tnat kind, as the vitvpoint
is rotated horizontally around the sign, If elements
of the sin are movable or flexible, as a flag or
string of lights, the measurement shall be taken when
.the *laments are fully extended and parallel to %.le
plane of view.
(a) "Non-Rdsidontial Zoning District" means any tonin
district desi hated as a P 0, OS, OR, C, LI or H1
district as sto,Wn on the oificial toning district map
of the City of Denton,
(f) "Owner" means a person who has legal title, control or
possession of,property,
(g) "Premiseai' shall soon a lot, parcel or tract of real
property as shown' on a plat approved' in accordance
with law and filed with the County Clark's Office or
i.
PACE 3
A d`; r TT F ,rAi tT t w d. r~ wf T*~P~
All "
W.
an unplattod trs4t of land as conveyed by dead or
oporatioa of law and recorded in the ottllicial records
of the County Clerk's Offies,
(h) "Residential Zoning 'District" mesas any soning
digIriot doslsnated as an A $1•7, SMO, SY-13,
$r- 4 20X, •R, XF-1 or Mr•l district as shown on
the ohioial soniag district sap of the City oi Denton.
(i) "Side Yard setback Lines" wan the imaginary lines
drawn parallel to the sldo yard lot line or property
lines on a precise which delineate the minimum
required side yard areas for that promise.
(j) "St All shall mean any daviee, fla``, light fixture
picture, letter, word, nesup , 41 l, plaque, VUJ
device, or poster visible gross premises on which
it is located or from any public street 404 designed
to inform or attract the attention of persons not on
that promise, exoludin$' those searchlights and
laudscape fixtures which display no words or symbol&
and pphone works of art which display no words or
additional symbols,
For purrppootel of thi Artl4le, or Article 70 particular
types of signs are furtt,.r defined hereto as follows;
(1) "Abandon ad Sign" shall mean an on•presiss sign
advertising an activity, business, service or
merchandise which vas at one tine, but is no
longer, located on the premise.
(2) "Attaehe4 Silo" shall mean any sign attached to,
applied on or supported by, any part of a bbuilding
(such as a wall, roof, window, canopy, awning, or
marquae) which encloses or covers usable space,
Wall bogne, roof signs and projecting signs shall
bo considered attached signs.
(3) "Dilapidated or Deteriorated Sign" shall mean a
stool
I
(aa) Where elements of the surface or background
can be soon as viewed from the normal viewing
distance (intended-viewin distance), to have
portions of the finishel material or paint
flaked, broken off, or missing, or otherwise
not in hermoay with the rest of the surface;
or
(bb) Where the structural support or frame members
are visibly bent, broken, dented, or torn; or
(cc) Where the panel' is visibly cracked or in the
case of wood and similar products, splintered
in such a way as to constitute an unsightly
or harmful condition; or
(dd) Where the atgn or ilamenti of it are twisted
or leaniag or at angles other than those at
which It wasr originally erected (such as may
result from being blown or the failure of a
structural support); or
(at) Where the message or wording can no longer be
claarly road by a person with normal eyesight
under aordAl viewing conditions.
j
PACE 4
F.
~17, 7F 7' w`t 7 e F 2 i r• .z S, i,
• a
(4) "Ground Sisa" shell mean "a sign whose priaoipal
support is pprovided by buryia , aaal~o is or otkMti-
wise eonamobias the sign, 41 suppar1i41 structure
thereof, to the irowad la such a "aasr to not to be
easily or quickly removed or relocated, sad which is
not a stem sign, portable sign or attached $ism.
(S) business, activity, shell
gololds, me any produ tie or aivervices not
usually located on the promises where the $ion is
located or which directs persono to any premise other
than where such sign is located.
(6) "On-Precise Sign" shall mean any si a advertising tno
businoss, erson, activity, g004e, products or
services pr rily located, sold or offered for solo
on the ppo ses where the sign is located. A aisa
which;pfoeotes or displays a political, religious or
14oolo coal thought, belief, opinion or other purely
noacosr orcial messaie shall be considered an
on-pr'omsise sign.
(7)` '1060'gisn" or 14A Sign" shall mesa Say number of dace
located oa or supported by a single support
structure
(a) "Portwbla Sign" shall scan a sign whose principal
supporting structure is intended, by design or
construction, to be used by resting upon the {round
for, support end which may be as,stly add Quickly moved
or relocated for reuse.- portable aims shall include,
but not be limited to, signs mounted 'upon or designed
to be mounted upon a trailer, beach, wheeled carrier
or other non-sotorired sobils structure with or with
out wheels; cad A-frame signs and other similar
signs, or'au porting' structures thereof, resting or
leaning on the ground or other structures but not
permanently attached thereto.
(9) "Projecting Sign" shall mean any sign which is wholly
affixed to, or supported by any building wall, and
which exte do beyond the building will more than
twelve (12"3 inches.
(10) "hoof Sign" shall mean any sign wholly erected on,
affixed to, constructed on, maintained upon, supported
by, or located upon any roof of any building.
(11) "Stake Sign" shall mean a sign whose principal sup-
porting structure is so designed or s sped, usually
by !making'ono and pointed, so is to be erected and
used by pushing, pounding, hammering or forcing icto
the ground and allowing quick and easy removal and
relocation froo one place to another.
(12) "kill Sign" shall mean any sign wholly affixed to,
:u pbrta by, or fainted upon the wall of any
bu~lding,;add which is not a profectiag sign.
(k) "Supporting structure" means any pole, post, cab14, or
other structural fixtures, or parts, to arranged.or used
so as to hold, secure or support a sign, or part thereuf,
and which is not imprinted or labeled with any picture,
symbol, letters, numbers, or words in excess of one inch
in height nor is internally or decoratively illuminated.
(1) "Wind Orvica" means any fla , banner, ponnant, streamer or
similar device chat moves freely in the air.
PACE 5
i .ti tr 1 ~y~
3, SLen.89 N„Hot_PANUjaled, The following types of signs shatl
be 'exempt from the provisions of this Artiolel
(a) q$p"atgj Sj&u Any sign emoted or maintained
cant go -no to discharge of any povornmeatal
ungtioa or which to required by law, ordinance or
governmental ~agulatioa,
. Any sign within or on railway property
(b) %
q p"$*a 0. maintained in reference to the operation
such railway,
(o) ppi aoN~~.atStransmissionn *4 11utility or Underground
(d) V,oki&Sle Still. Signs displayed or used upon vehiolea,
fa e s or aircraft unless such vehicle, trailer or
aircraft on which such sign is ditpleyood is permanently
stationed or regularly used at a fixed location to
serw the same or similar purpose of a permanent or
portabko sign not affixed to a vehicle, trailer or
airora t,
us V AoY sign where no art
(e) ei~ug"e fii"~i3I13Iifrom any public street. p
(f) l ~ Temporary , holiday or
re ous i s w u oreial advertising.
(g) lWal go LUp Rand hrld signs, signs, symbols or
spas on persons or aniaels.
a 91gna being manufactured, transported
(h) u Sig,
or stt rim ad not being used, in any meaner or form,
for purposes of advertising,
(i) Pls ue , Couisamorative 'plaques of reco`niaed
s or cal societies and orgauizations.
(j) Pxiyat T i Cu crol. On-pr*site signs which
3 xset~` tFs,
nt or traffic on private property
(such as entrance and exit signs) or warn of
obstFCles, overhead clearances, or control parkin t;
provided that such signs, are lsaa than 10 feet n
affective area, are less than 6 foot in height, and
are not placed so as to interfere with the safe
movement of vehicles or pedestrians.
(k) Hail Soxes. w r a. Signs located on mail
boxes', newspaper vet ng machines, and curbside
residential newspaper holdors which identify the owner
and address of the promises or the name of the
nowspapor sold or subscribed to; provided, that such
devices are not placed to as to interfere with the
safe movement of pedestrians or vehicular traffic.
(1) dutdoar Machiaes~ Devige and Eluipm*nt. Signs
Ool ! On, accacned t0.. or pa a .'upon ,Chines,
devices and-equipmont located or used outdoors which do
not generally kJvertiae the business unarm such
machines, dai,ices'and equipment are used or located but
do, in regard to such machines, devices or equipment,
identify its trademark, tradoname or manufacturer; give
the tame or cost of the product or service provid*d
thersfroh.; or Siva the operating, instructions therefor.
PACE 6
"a
.a , a cSa~~'9i ~'i SR'°C`t~~°Y;~.fc'*r+ri ;jy"°4 nn ~i-n'r- ~Z••'+7}# , c v
i ' AA
, r
i Such paohi s, devices and eqq~e at o1+a11 iaeluie, but
ltod to ooia-operated vend okiaoa, twl
ae« 14 Mot
dil ~agpumps 0 telapheae booths or ittOd ausu-
smttc ~er maohiaiss, autometiw vacuum cioauers, "d
other olas'sal!-service outdoor mechiaes, d"ieos or
aruipmsat.
4. f biied sisti . It oha11' be unlawful for any pet$" to
erect, construct, maintain, reconstruct, place, ocavert, locate
or make use of or cause to be *ratted, constructed, maintained,
reconstructed, placed, located 'ar used, any of the following
signs for advertising purposesi
(a) S as n TOSS:! 1'ropguy Nithout C_ ouseat of 4rasr.
*Long oo Oct p a s proper y t
of the owneri of(I said promises.
(b) x~ 'itb 01 IWO) ~i/'Rl wigwo! a rrchgvisre
off-street fJurking $#sco or 15"Ouvoriag area.
(o) Unsal3I3z ism. Signs vhleh are, or becomes
e , dilapidated or in danger of falliey or
otherviao unsafe.
(d) $Jsiks on ~{iblig; r a Signs, which are located on
c u s.a v o alt, sidswolk, alloy, risht~of-
ways curb, or any public bridge or part of caw, or on
any public building or Utructur* of asy kind beloasias
to the City, when such use or :locatioa unreasonably
interferes with, or creates danger in tPS use of the
public property. In any cases- ground or portable,
ofiat shot 1 not b0 located within the public right.
of -way and no sign shall be located with- in a street
median or intersection visibility triangle.
(a) Coda CoaRItAnca. Signs which do not comply with an
applicable provision of a building code, electrical
code, or other applicable code or ordinance of the
City.
(f) Troea and Shrubs. Signs located on trees and shrubs,
(g) o io Pioture_ Silas Sig~ys which employ a
R ~c lure mslchine.
(h) Silas ¢bscur1njt or Interfering With View. Signs
a o_ "'TL" li3Tn such a mapper as to obscure
or othe,wise intsr;ere with the offsctivoness of an
official traffic tiga,-sipal or devUlo or to as to
obstruct or intaRaere with the: view oil a driver of
approaching, *margins or ihtarsdctiag traffic, or so
as to prevent any traveler Foo any street iron
obtaining a clear view of approaching' vehicles for a
distance of 250 fret along the street.
(i) froger ig ding Of~11sw Sip,ns. Signs containing
or making use o lights wh et are not effectively
shielded as to prcvont beams o rays of lights from
bein direated at any PPortion o tna traveled way of a
ppubl o St.-r which era ~sf such intensity of
brilli,aace, ` reSardless of iuta, directions , or
shie Vitals to a; to likely ia'air or iaterfere with
the _sioa of any driver of an;j motor vehicle upon a
public street.
s
PACE 7
~4 1'rf` ~Y { i~~ '+l
'Any wigp verb
Christ"s 11g is pr sins 1f~► b vs eX804 CeM~laoig*
or vhieb b Ave auto"tinally chsagLog massages.
4
• S.~~tratiea gnf°et The ruilaiat Official
shall onforc and a4sisittea the provisions of this Article. The
building" Official or 'City ?Tanager may delegate the duties and
powers lreanted to and imposed upon the building Official by this
Article,
1. Por"tt Required for Bisns. It shall be unlawful for, any
person to place, locate, Bract, construct, reconstruct, alter,
64ta'tain, or make use of any signs cot exempt from regulation,
without daviag first toaut'ed`s written permit for such sige fr6a
the building Official, except as otherwise Provided in this
Article.
2. Sxceotions to Permit Recuirameat. The following types of
regulated silos shall be exempt from the permit requirements of
this Articles but must comply with all other applicable regulation
of this Articles
(a) Legally nonconforming signs as defined in this Article.
(b) Wall signs, legal notices and building address numbers,
(c) State or National Flags.
(d) Signs painted on glass surfaces of windows or doors.
(a) Portable Signs.
(f) Stake Signs,
3. Application Procedure. The application for a sign permit
shall be submitted on such forma as the Building Official may
prescribe and shall be accompanied by such information, drawings
and descriptive data as roquIrad by the Building Official to in.
sure proper regulation of such sign and to insure compliance with
this Article.
4. Permit Fes. If the plans and specifications for such sign
sat forth in any 'Application for a permit conform to all of the
roAuiraaaats of. this Article and any other, ordinance or law
applicable thdrato, the building 09<icial` shall, upon payment of
the following fee, is A" the appropriate permits
PAGE 8
7) 47 W7-
171' _7
tifNtive Ant 21 Stan (Sf. Ft.)
0 t4 . $0 115,00
ever to 100 10
over' 1 to 1 2 ,
ow to $0.00
3. 'Russ ioa of tftmit. Was$ otharwiss revoked, All permits
issued for sipas shall be valid'for as indefinite period of time,
except as otherwise provided for in this Article.
6, Joy"atign 21 ! ,
(a) Raffia 1 OTdaT, The Suildiap Official is
n6rer a g i "Sir to revoke an sad all site
permits for violation of K big
Arti*14 provided that, the W ldiol A ticial sk#11
aomdAiati a hearing, if roqueatod by the po"I t kwl4or,
Prior to the rllroeatiom` of the r~i%- The
*at
whale po !a w►der oo OlAkratitk:0 ell De ai. per"
. lesttt ' ► (10) dayll +►it'it4fa uotics! ,4 the date 4"
C1tM. 4f the MAS a1~1 lthell be p ittod to Ove4 pt
Tfl'fyamt tAdta ; tEd ~d rinefatioa.
Fol owing such the ties a ffidiAl SbAll
issue written decisi'oa, and, if such permit is to be
rovoiAd provide the permit holder with a copy of suoh
deci'sloakan~d! order revoking such permit.
(b) Aid f"I ""~n nay'per~tith¢lder wishing to
App. eciiioa order of the 4uilding Official
revoking a silo permit may appeal the seen to the
board of Adjustment in accor aocs with the laws,
ordinances, rogulations sad procedures governing other
matters appealed to said board.
C. PORTABLE SIGNS.
1. Regulations Aoolieable to all Portable Signs. In addition
to all other applicable prnvisions the following regulations
shall apply to all portable signs is all zoning districts.
(a) Flashing Lights Prohibited. No portable sign shall
e use so as ro' u~ use of any flashing or
intermittent lights on or in conjunction with such
sign.
(b) S s re All portable signs used for
a ver ng purposes, whon'act in transit, shall be
securely anaborod, so as to prevent overturning or
unsafe eovemoat, the sufficienty of such anchorage to
be determined by the Building Official,
(c),~ax~m se. No portable sign sha11 be used for
acTGer s nS which is in excess of 72 square feet of
effective area.
2. Number of On-Pramise Portable Signs Limited. No person
shall place, erect, maintain or a:xe use of, at any one time, on
any one promise more than two (2) 'on-promise portable signs for
purposes of advertising of an effective area of 1S square left
PAGE 9
• y„ ~l~Z~YI ~ r . E 7 c$RC-u].'* . .y nn "''-s5, ~"`""K''2Rfi„f"~'v tii .
or to so or moiro than out (1) on-prosise portable sign for
purposes of a)ivertl.siug of an effective area of more than 23
aowre feet.
3. Rgy;Ag;om of off-t Mlse' ftlt4lb}a Signs. The followt%
regulations' shall apply to all off-premiss portable signs used
for advertising;
(a) Lir. No parson shall erect, maintain or
nos • vas o more than one off-pres<ise portable sign
at aayy one tide to advertise, identify or otherwise
give information relating to the business, activity*
event, product or service, whether one or mor
located on or at any one busiaesa, store or
oommeroial establishrent.
a
(b) opera d, No Portopp, shall place, arced, make use oqf
o tat* an off -premise portable sign within
feet of another off-presise portable alga. Is
ON 4timg the spa r quirsmeat, the 0"9%ursm"t
sl Woods pa r to re the nearest curb line asW
on the same silo of the street,
(c) I_e The owner of as off premise portable
sign she cause each sign to be conspicuously
labeled or marked with the owners acme, address and
telephone number.
(d) Register To So Kept. Every owner.placing, w ins or
as n a A ng aA off-promise portable sign shall koop
a current register or book showing the date or dates
when, and location of the premises whera, such sign
is placed or used. No ,person shall record or
register a sign as being ured on a date or dates or
at a premise when such sign was not to used. Every
person required to keep a current register or book
shall make such register or book available to the
Building Inspector for inspection, upon demand, at
any reasonable time.
4. Abatement of Off-premise Portable Signs in Five Years.
Beginning five years from the effective date of this ordinance,
no person shall *root, use, make use of, or maintain any off-
promise portable sign for advertising or business puq ores.
D. REGULATION OF SIGNS BY ZONING DISTRICTS.
The following' regulations apply to specified signa in _he
` specified zoning districts.
1. Residential Districts. The following regulations shall
apply to signs in all residential coning districts.
acting, ,sortable or off-promise
Roofpproj
aa~es are pro~~ibited.
(b) Height. No sign shall have a greater height than 13
fast.
t,
1 Sr '
PA-JE` 10 a;
j ,ir
F -1- a { i ~i...~ o. IRAM No ~l>ea shall have an Affective Arne RsaoaaT
(e) W.fo $Iwtd~ foot,
(d) All toWad sigae shall. t,otAAia a sliutomb
e' or s tb*ok fTa tho 41 line which is
gull to OY gyrator Chia ow•halol thm required
s boat yard for the promise Where th alga is located.
(o) Only sae ground sign 'shale be loootad on
000 6 so; except as provided Lor as follows;
(1) Aay ppremises fronting more than one public street,
which is act en alloy, shall boo allowed to omen
use of one ground sign on each saparato' street
frontage.
(2) Any presise which has wee than 450 loot of `public
street !rootage on say one public street (exclud-
iW alleys) may make use of one Additional #mad
sigm for each 00 toot of frontage, if friction
thtrsrf; Rho royad siraa to b: plac a* 010"T
thou ese- 1~ o the total istaace of total
street frontage oq which they are used.
2.m~ideet Rife eta. The, following regulntieao
k
sh411 apply to sips is non-resic4edtial toning districts:
(a) Tn All types of aigae are permitted,
?b), # gd, which iA pot r roof #igp, shall
height greeter than 40 feet.
(c) Six*. n shall have an affective area greater
400 aqua foot.
(d) kthAck. All ground, portable, and pxo.leeting signs
'•FtIT~ Aintain a sinistus distance or setbback frog the
curb line, as determined by height and effective
area, in accordance with the following,
4 Minig4a Setback F
3 30 30 30
Haight (ft') 2 20 20 30
0 20 30
0 so 1S0 400
Effective Area (S4.Ft.)
(In crteraining the required setback the measurement
of the height or effective area o? the sign which
would require the greatest setback shall be usmq;
provided, however, that if the determining height or
effective area -oeaaurekent is a dimension that
separAtes two different setback requirements the
least restrictive setback 'shall be uW.)
(a) Nusbor. Qaly one round, sign, or supporting strua
u hereof, sha h be *catsd on any one presise,
except as fulloaal`
(l) Any presises fronting more than one public street:,
which is not an allay, shall be allowed to mske
use of one ground sign for each separate street
, _ ' lroetrge. ~i
PACE 11
x<'~1„-~ ate".-'4 - Kn r a
.'S 7 r ASV.
(t) A041 roltoso whi,ah bas sore thou 450 fee of a10 lays)
att raatego as sty 0", strost (4401 a1lays)
say 04M use of oM additioeel 4$0 toot of a ,
' or Motion tboreot. Too ii;aa to 'be pirea a;,
closer than e4.h4lt of the total distames of the
total street ieoatape ell Auk tbey are used.
(3) W4►ar~ p+C s4 eomtaae hero t Q lawfµl,l
part4t tt bu6 ems or we in Ovido uila"a t a"
= iaess or use' thereon shall W allowed can or save
on-presise signs on the, porsitted Supporting
Structures thereon.
3. P wed Daw~logmat Di~istt[i All signs located lA a
Manned Dewlopsont District shall comply with all provialoss of.
this Article iaoludiag any provision that would haw been
applicable to the property on which the sign is located had the
property boom otherwise soned into districts in accordance with
the "as shown on the approved Site plan for such plastid ai
i
Dewlopeeati provided,` however, that the planning and Zeaimg
i
Comassion say rocomead, sad the City Council say vary in the
planned development ordinance for said presises, any of the Sign
requiresants of this Article as such rsquiresents would apply to
Signs in Plaaaod Development Districts.
4. Co ral business Dist tricti. The following regulations
shall apply to aigra in Central Dusinaos 'zoning Districts.
(a) ~i-W&y__ Lag station on Prc Pectins Sitcs. No pro-
ject no ~;n s~h&Itproject or extsn hto the public
ritht•of-woy for a distance of more than 10 feet or
within 2 feet of the nearest curb line, whichever is
more restrictive. No projgoting sign, supporting
Structure, or part thereof which extends into the
public right-of-way anall oaoupy any of the apoo)a
bbetwear the round level and 8 Feet above said greiund
level in said right-of•way.
(b) site. 'No sign shalt have an effective area greater
E a 400 Square feet,
(c} Nsiiht Limitatiops. No around sign or supporting
Strut ura rem shall have a height greater then 40
loot.
E. REGULATION OF ATTACUD SIGNS.
In addition to any other applicable rrdulationa, the follow-
ing regulations shall apply to the type of aian specified in all
Schins districts.
1.'Roof St=ns.
(a) Projeotion. Roof Signs, or the supporting `structure
thereof, shall not extend laterally beyond the exterior Halle,
PACE 12
r.
q
5 er upwase beyogd the highest point of the roof of tbi ►uilh:ag es
yAiolt it is located, to a hoigae, as maafured 9r" gtsW W lwai
to the hubase port of the roof, which is greatas then oraift"
below, as followrt
1 'oae ~1)) story bldg gSS¢~ of Rd$ hot
4ht
2 two ,Z) Story bids. 30x of d hatght
3 three (3 to five (S) sto bldg of di M iiht
sit ((6 to alas (9) t ldg
p o l MR I) to fifteen 1 11) story bldg 131 o bld4 ho tht
t
sixtaao (16) story bldg or higher Max. hoight of foot
(b) All roof signs shall be thoroughly
! ~ W* Ths building upon which they are installed.
t'
I; 2. praieaeiaa~ Pieas,
(a) . All `projecting bias shall be aecu:~tly
I` ~ the building or strue uxeo
t (b) Q~CTQQ'3n rij~1 ofp aaneotbyildt abal4 *at too
project above the roof or parapet wall or O► ow the
roo level whaea two is so parapet Milli "eapt that
a ,aiS4 er"ted at a right angle to the building, Glh*
hoeisontal width .of which sign, prrpaadioular' to ty'ch
wall, does 'sot exceed eighteen ioehes may be ereet''kW
to a height not 'axcoadiag 2 fait above the roof or
parapet wall or above the roof level where there is a,z
parapet wall. A sign attached to a corner of p
budding sad go to the vertical line of such
corner, shall bo deemed to be erected at a right angle
to the building wall.
(c) Sig, 'Cho total square, footage of all projecting
ai`ns shall not exceed twenty (10x) percent of the
Will area on which such signs are located,
3. Vail MKOS.
(a) Con r i n. Wall signs attached to exterior walls
o SO~Ld wsoor , concrete of stone, shall be safely
and securely attached. }food blocks shall not be, used
for anehora a except in the 'oat*,,, wall a as
attached to buildiags with walls;o}' .9, A wall sign
shall not be supported by anch&' set, secured to as
unbraeod parapet wall.
(b) U" The fatal square footage, of all wall signs
sal not •xoted'tuaaty (20x) ppero,ent of the wall area
on which such si=ns are loosted.
4. Stags on Comog guildiaar. When coo or morn attached
signs are located or to be 16cated on a building which i;/ divided
and contains more than one business or use, the. rogulation of
such attached signs specified herein, as to stle and projaetion,
r shall apply separately, to the part of the exterior walls 'Khiob
h,
contain that business or use.
PACE 13
. .jV17 Fps
I 1:'~ l ~ rj.11~
Y
F. AAAWMM MN
1, 1{ ~klf1 l1l~ 3i8l~ All abandoned sigas mad tlMit
supporting struitur" I it set a b"ldiog, shall be rsmowd wit"a
thirty (30) 'days, from.ebe dots of mat by the owner of the
promises on which suct;l sign'` is located. Any sign or suaportiat
structure which is so' abandooed sign on the affective data of
this ordinance 0411 be removed within thirty (30) days of the
effective date of this ordinance.
2, fntenaion of Ties Tye Use. The owner or lessee of the
promises on which as abandoned sign is located, who desires to
use such siSa, or supporting structures say within sixty (60)
days of the ab*wommsat or eftostivedatei of this ordicenas, shoe
application to the buildi.os Official for ap extstulom of time to
sake use of such sign. If they sign or supporting structure
conforms to all requirements of the low, and the applicant submits
reasonable evidence that he is sadoovoring to oaks use of such
sign in a lawful manner the building Official may grant an
extension of ties up to a maximum of twelve (12) months for the
owner or lassaa to make use of the sign. The building Official
may, as a condition of granting such extension require that the
owner or lessee paint out, obscure, ecvnr, or remove some or all
of the elements or message or face portion of the sign in such
manner as to leave the ai`h and supporting structure peat and
unobtrusive in appearance or in harmony with the adjacent
buildings to which it is located or attached.
3. Procedure for Removal of hbandonad Signs. Any abandoned
sign for which an extension of time to use has not bean granted,
or any unlawful sign or supporting structure thereof, is hereby
declared a public nuissnoe and say be r&wved in accordance with
the procedures met forth herein.
(a) dgtic• an Order. The building Official shall deliver
or send a written notice to the person responsible for
placement, erection, or saintsnanas'of an abandoned,
or unlawful sign, if known$ or if not known] to the
owner or person in control of the sign or, premises
whsrs .such slya is 104ted or4erisg the rssmewal of
such sign and its supportintt structure within tan
(14) days of delive♦;y or mAi US of" the uotic• and
PACE 14
7 er>'..( 'M1 ..'S•: r`y :
t
order. for p ' 0*4 of Chic froviliom OV amM Of tbp
Per*" listol; t City ax l►paeasor/Collector of
em;bomr looKll tdk luriWittioo for t urpOaes a the
orM„SS et tM p err. Snap, al►a~a~ed ar um~aKful
i b i! 1oAotad a 11 bo ►eoiwo~'to be ;be aw~ar of
y Pr1► or tl» "t for ►tleb owner a "ti"
eked or delivered to Said per oa at tba address
list«# shall be praswood to be su'ftioiaat,
(b) y if the pdr+lon ordered remove remove said
s 94146 do sa within the tisc i~w. Specified, the
B ld Official may, after twenty (20) days of the
97 date delivery or mai sag of the nonce Sold order,
ra*OVe of awe said sign to be ewv*d i~rovided,
~wr, that any parson gSrieved said order may
file an appeal with the Board of Adjul te"t in
accordance with the provisions applicable for other
aaali froa Appleal iss tinslr 11,104 the f prooooftr"
applicAula to other appeals shall be followed and this
order of the Willinj Ogficis ray be stayed is
sccordsese, roof poa(ty the imal detarmiratiom of
the bard ot'JwleMnnt.
(c) W 4 16, r Tu 3 ZZ&OL&A pursuant to
these provisions shall b. sire d cad transported to
and stored by tkN guildias official at a location
? designasied for sueb urpose. Ilacerds of whore cueh
s as rare located eadpkben removed shall be kept. The
Ew1aib; Official Sba11 Sand' a letter to 'the ovaor of
11441 sisn, it kno++u, or it oot knowas to the owner or
ppeeraoa 1a control Of the promiseswhere such sign is
located giving notice of such impoundment.
The building Official shall hold the sign is storage
for at least,thirty (30) days alter notice of impound-
sent has been `mailed. Any portable sign may be redeemed
by the owner ;hereof upon the payment of a fee to the
City cf Denton through the Building Official, of a total
of $25.00 for hauling the same to storage plus $1,00
per redeemed bthe owner thereof n upon payment a sign may be
by p of the cosy
of removal of and haulm the sane to storage, as
detarained by the Building Official, plus $1.00 par day
storage fee.
An sign not reclaimed by the owner thorsof within
thirty (90) days of the nailing of too notice of
impoundment may be disposed of in accordance with
applicable law,
(d) R.jcoovv._a££ Coots. If, upon disposal 99f 'sti unredeemed
noavorroul'o T164, the Building Of LOW has not
received an a"unt sufficient to cover the cost of
removel-Sad haulm] of such resolved sign,; t" Building
Official aha11 Send notice to thp`ovaer,of tha premisas
where such siga was located roquostiS
n PaYs!eat of the
removal end haulin= colts less Any amount regeived in
disposal of such sign. My such `osts remaining unpaid
after 'thirty (30) days from the data of mailing of
notice shall become delinquent and shall bear interest
at ten (10x) percent per anus. The Building Official
may cause such unpaid and delinquent amount to be
assassad a ainst tea pr"nsas hero such removed,, sign
was loeats~ :by'filing Ydd perfecting a lien against f`
tail prerisas. 'The, cost levied ri'gainst said prazises 41
shall include a $50.60 administration fee.
PACE 15
7
i
Us"" i Levied.
o4tC Xop aP' rMmwi3
of • d, a lMswiwla~r tiln ap~• vita
rM of Ai~vp►t Ott tw11 (~o)rM;o.re
tale it of , . settee o Pat"41 tat
of Ad uetmtat iitlwss upbold tbM post imposed My
the "44 *g 0l or impose beuae to 04
levied whato or cost it considers to be roasoaeala.
n $%orate cotta' iapossd hereunder shall not be
4ppaa able.
0. Sr941AL MOVU XONS .
1 • Meaner of Meuurumat.
t (a) . To apply the setback' provision of this
for aims a ear one point, the following
#XZL measur?mg procedure shall be uaedi
(1) Draw an L"Sisary vertical flea extending upward
from the curb line of tbo premises,
(1) Afti" at ear pelA4 oa tb* wrti4al, line draw
wart ~41 Le a nod curbs lie ~ pateonalog qding to the
a coward
the promisee; so$ pg at the point wtwre the vertical line
t tatttsseot ho labspal line, measure along the
i= hortsoatataeor Cho" renuired setback. (See
Appendix Illustration 146)
(b) 57 ti. To apply the applicable; height limitations
s Arciole at ear one point for signs, or
supporting structures thereof, which are not roof
signs, the following measuring procedure shall be
used:
(1) Draw as isaginary vertical line extending upward
from the nearest curb line of the public street
fronting the premises;
(2) Seginning at the surface level of the curb line
measure along the vertical line to a point which
is the s"Lous allowed height for a particular
sign or supporting structure;
(3) From that point draw eA isagiaa horixoncal line
perpendicular to the vertical Line towards the
promises ;
(4), This extended horizontal line gives the maximum
height allowed at that`lacatibu for a particular
Sian or supporting structure. (Sea Appondtx
Iliuetration 14b)
(c) E ! o ve 6geti- In deterasaiag the eifectiva sre4~of
a • gn w • more then oaa sign is ,located ct• s,ffixe'd
to a single supporting structure, all tigns located
thereon or affixed therato shall be «ncluded and
measured together as though they were one'rsign.
2. Setback Clearance one. In all zoning districts, except
Central busiiess 1?isttttets, all ground eigas shell be 84 located
so that no part of the offeotivo arse of such sign shall occupy
PAGt 16
t
1 J t .Ni ♦J ~ 1 R, - It'4 { } 1
1 I ~ L en t M ..%1 7tr,
l
m
t tea sp4co,'(so dotorrined in the sera aannor for amasur"S
bnlght aN sotbaek for signs), between 2 and 10 foot is height
vithiw 13 feet of this curb line of any public street; (goo
Appendix211ustratioa 1400
The supporting structure of such sign may occupy such apses
to an "toot no greater' than 2 aquaria foot is area, such area to
be determined is the sane manner as for affective aroo of signs,
3. Signs go Certain Niahwavs. The provisions of this
Article shall apply to all signs along the Interstate or Prisiary
8ystom of Itighwa~s within the City to the extent that such
provisions supplereot or, coc~pliaent, but are not in comflict
with, any law, rule or regulation cnactod by or Made pursuant to
the Fe"rel riighvey 11"utificsti.oe Act, (23 p.S.C.A., See. 131,
at, s") including all averments thereto, or the Texas gighway
As"tificatioa Acto (Article 6674 V-1, V.A.C.S.) including all
,
arrnd" ots thereto. All sign permitr issued by the Building
official pursuant to this Artiole shall contain a notice
advising the parmittes that signs located along the interstate
or primary system of highways may be regulated by federal or
state law or regulation and a permit may be required from
another governmental agency.
4. C~*Sraace from Electrical kjW, Signs shall be located
a minimum distance of 6 feet measured horizontally and 12 feet
measured vertically from overhead electrical conductors which
era energized in excess of 750 volts, TC a term "overhead
eooductors" as utid herein moans any electrical conductor,
either bate or inaulatad, installed above the ground.
S. Tompola Political $1ana.
(o) To or", real estate sales and davelopeento teapovary
polities!, occasional sales and other special use
sigIa'which are uaod for, or relate to, a particular
purpose or event shall be reaovad by the owner of the
premise on which they are located after tan (10) days
of the date of the accouplisherant of the purpose for
which they are used of the occurrence of the event to
which they refer or relate.
(b) In .,the cast' of c ovary ; Peliticeh •1404 tho.
candidate to which a sJgn' raters, if not placeil on a
pramisa by the ovnor of the premise tpeteof, shall b
PACE 17
t .
fT.,'jF r r§t pL^ ~ ~'Li 4j'. v i. `ri+a , ~t. aa'. .'1 "'ww•.. 'r, v ,t w ,+{;f.~" ,ww Fe~1` ,mMq„
E
,
rN thlf~s~ tot tho removal for such 0,4464 Within the
Rjeaied abaw.
(a) tubs or Po to 64ir0 wbioh rtlm« to a asAAidata of
iuw Re 1N' , wrN ,vieh by a ►eltioal' Y it at a
rcus alootiea and are O '44wo eat POKor "I Le
o~rnioootivoar*s say be 'ems d ' withosw; lWt as o
ith all
auw►*ei re ' that such 1 ns ::Otto
0 apP~ioab roquirewats J t8his la. -
16. sign Mpintsaaoea All signs and supporting structures
shall be kept in good repair, condition cad appearance. All
faces, bolts, supporting grows and fastosin,ts shall be trot from
deterioration, insect or rodent infestations rot or looaooing.
tainted signs which are faded or obaoured beeausa rf vosthsr or
time shall be'repaiatod or redone of poiated over so so to be
meat in aPpoattw:ae.
7. 14"A ka of S us. Rverr off•ptwina sign shall be
plainly marked at *:It tioas, in a location so as to be conspicuous
and easily identifiable, with the current acre, address and tale-
phone number of the`' owner or lessee of the sign.
k. NONCONlOIUIINO 81G~t5.
1. Augli~cfbility. The provisions of this Article, defining
and regulating nonconforming signs, shall' control over any otter
conflicting provision of the toning ordinsT%ne.
2. Defined. A sign, including its supporting structure, shall
be considered nonconforming when it does not conform to all or
part of the provisions of this Article applicable thereto, is not
a portable sign or stake sign, ands
(a) effective date of t islArticle,lo atad and used on the
(b) was is existence and lawfully located and used in
accordance with the provisions of the prior ordinance
App,ll.'oable thereto, or which was considered legally
nonconforming thereunder, and 'has since been is
continuous or regular use; or
(e) was in exitanoe, located, _and used on the propa'ty at
the time the property was annexed to the City of Denton
and has sines, been in regular and continuous use.
3. Destr"}otion; Repair.
(a) Any noneonformio sign, including ilia suy porting
structure, which is destroyed, draysd, dilapidated or
dotertorited shall not be ropl*c'sd, (repaired, or
PAGE 18
11. Ia 't: r q., ,rrrli IMI tz. s,,..,4 rr .4'~t*f-t7,ayg sac sr-(("~i i t;,. -t °,'i }5 ,r`. T~° ~ b 'i y.,: ,w,.
i,- .
roArvatrd, in whole nY is part, it ouch replacement,
repair or rfaovattoo would require a eadituro of
monies is excess of gigt77 percent or the rapy o-
ducti0a odat of a new saga, inclining its supportias
structure, which is subotaatially the same or similar
to the nonconforming aiga destroyed, damaged,
dilapidated or deteriorated.
(b) The buildin oUWAl airy, whenever he d t"4 aeo scary
to reaeoaa~ly determine the applicability o the
i foregoing provision,, require the owner of said Pon-
conforming sign to submit two or more independent
estimates from eatabiished sigp companies of the cost
of replacing roeairtag or reppovsting, is whole or in
part the sxiatiog n~$aooaformtn a n and two or Moto
fade~fadeat e~ttidMate~►, from ertablisEakd sign oomp4mies
of li a rep cduot on cost of new sign# including its
oupporting structure, which is substantially the sews
or si~ilar to the nonadeforming sign destroyed
o"64 dilapidated or deteriorated,
(o) No oiga or rspupportin structure wbf,oh is lavlully
si na *haall0br In re~is'fd Sari iativeas~Kea nti hi jq! g
k
4. TGraiwtioa: Time teriod. All ligilly nonconforming oiins,
' including supporting structures, shall be removed or modified to
as Tito comply with the provisions of this article on or befoxe
January 1, 1994 or within ten (10) years of the date the sign
became nonconforming, whichever is later.
5. Appeals from Tsrminntion Period. The owner of any noncon-
forming sign may appeal the termination time specified for such
sign to the board of Adjustment. App-sal proeidures, unless
otherwise specified herein, shall be those ss used in other
mattars appealed to the board of Adjustment.
(a) imi for F in A sal . The owner of any nonconfort-
s:g-~ys yn wt.o w s r,s to appeal the termination da%,e
apppplicabla to Such owner's sign shall file his appeal
with the board of Adjustment within one (1) year of
the affective date of the ordinance or within one (1)
year the premises on which is located a nondoaforming
s sign is annexed to the Cityi Failure to file such
appeal within the time epacified constieutes a waiver
of the right to, appeal or contest the termination date
applicable to such nonconforming sign.
(b) Hearing A ea s, The Board of Adjustment may in its
sae oa, ear all properly flied appeals a tor the
'S. one (1) year period for filing has passed and not all
appeals to be heard at one or more times as is
convenient for sucb.Board.
•,t
(c) ]Qjtar~inatiotj. The Board of Adjustment, in case of
ippial of the -applioabk. termination datashall
detarmine whether the termination data applicable to
appellant's aign has allowed sufficient time for the
appellant to recover his capital Investment in the
nonconforming sign. In making such determination the
.G
r
PAGE 19
'af
1. ~ ` vi Yi ~S `y~!` ` ~K'~ a: .9i '^I l ".S •'T7'W Tr-.f\Rr ~'N j'.p~hY*'.. S`:' rT `f 'f d^~Ji~ 7 1W M..''lS ~M 5 yr`.
J
1o4r4 May consider Iihs amount of the initial capital
investment, life ex1)e0t&AQy of the avestswut, the
raavsl colt to comply with theca regu~stioas-sad any
other factr the loarc believae to be pertiaen 0 the
determination, The a0rtia4tion period a pgafed from
shall be calouleted or measured from the beginning of
the amortisation period; i.e, the data the sign
beaoaise nonconforming.
(d) ~the If pp Ward
f e as RP ace as applied to
a ce at
oes not afford
appa last s nonoonformiap sign does'
suit atent time to allow Ap elladt to ricouo his
iawst#eat in ouch sign, the card may grant 6y its
order, an extension of time to a data ipealfisd so
that such sign may ba maiatained a• a nonconforming
sign until such specified date.
llelocs,,tica of N2nc ormia4, UAOS, Notwithstea4ing say
other provision of this Article,'- any sign which is a legally,'
axisCir Aonaoaformiag sits hereunder may be relocated on the
same lot or treat of, load if the sign is required to be resaved
from its present location because of the acquisition of the
property upon which the sign isI ooacod by any governmental agency
or other entity which did t,t :nuld have acquired the property
through the exercise of its 0ow4r of eminent domain. Such relo-
cated sign shall be placed, insofar as possible, as to comply
with all the provisions of this Article. The termination period
specified herein shall not be extended because of such relocation.
7, Slans Located on Nonconforming Promises, Where, on the
affective data of this ordinance, a sign is located on a premise
which is a legally nonconforming use of the premise and such sign
is used in regard thereto, the sign may be used and maintained
thereon, even though it would not be a permitted use, so long as
such premise is continually used as a lawful nonconforming use,
provided, however, if such sign is nonconforming as to height,
area, or setback, such sign shall. after the termination period
aliowad herein, be brought in conformity with such requirements
applicable to the toning diltrict in which such sign is located.
1. MCIAL EXCEPTIONS ALLOWED.
1, The board of Adjustment may grant i,spacial exception from
i
the provisions of this Article for the setback or height of a
nonportable,sign under the following circutsstances,
,
PAGE 20
1 i of ~ l~,~T: I~f l 1l ~~y7 ~
j r
p)~1 .
i
Vhen fifty percent (34x) or
(s) R8 a c ~cilat4vosorl ~ ro& of such sign as located or
to be located 4noe wi th the setback or hel gbjt
requir"Wats Artio~e cdanot or would not tw
visible from at least one 'visibility point" bocauce
of the location of a building or structure oonstructaud
or $rooted prior to tk* effective date of thtls
ordinance.
For the purposes of this provision, "Visibility point"
stall maan the viewin locations, at 4 height of a
foot above the So oral surface Tavel, determined ay
extending the raqulred side yard 'sotbaok liaas of Lhe
premise on which 44ch ai~a is 1044ted or to be located
so u to interan4t the 4Q'Lrb line of the public street
froating said promise; 'idea measuring from said iatgt-
sectioa points along the curb line is the directioh of
the dearest side lot line of said lot for a distaeoe
of 100~ allok4 traffic I fl, the street
in' oolr (rout actialiroe iox, 01,he said vi+~ibility point locatca long the curb lire la he
diroaLiea from ab tr4f~lic app aMa paid Apreal ae
shall be used to dotornine the visibility requiromoat
heroin. (See Appendix illustration so. IQ).
(b) Mor~, • 'When 4 sign located on qbe
p"£wi" sa o as emacy medical treatrent f44iity
would, - because of the setback or height requirements
i of this Article, not be readily visible from adjacent
ublio, streets. For 'purposes of this prow Sion,
'dmesgonoy Medical Tr4atmeat laoility'' shall a"* say
hospital, clime or other facility where smidipal Aid
is offered to 'a parson or animal vho suffers an
unexpected 'injury or illness which requires immediate
medical attention.
2. In granting special exceptions allowed herein, the Board
of Adjustment shall specify, by written order,. the particular
setback or the particular height that will be allowed and in
doing, so shall not allow deviation from the provisions of this
Article beyond what is minimally necessary to remedy the
situation allowing for said special exception.
J. HISTORLAL LANDMARK SIMIS
The provisions of this Article shall not apply insofar as
they confict with any provision applicable to a sign designated
as a historical landmark pursuant to the provisions of Article
28A of Appendix D-toning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of.
Denton, Texas.
K. CONFLICTING MOVISIONS
The dafinitions and provisions of this Article applicable to
signs shall control over. any other conflicting definition or
provision found in Appendix a- Zoning of the Code of Ordinanoea'of
the City of Denton, Texas.
PACE 21
rffi" ~ t1 ~i ~~.'"l~f Y•fi f~ Sk EGA N i. .,!vl>1• i 1. .vi} p.....rr.
u', °`Yr .r ,7:A. w.R a ,',^n trY: ~°P ev f rt. rb i f1
58CfI,~,OwN~IiI
That the Appdadix 111uetrationS of ,lppsadix 1•20nin4 of the
Cods o OrdiAsaese of the City of Lenton are hereby Amended by
addias the following illustratioUl
14. SIGNS
144. Mehsuremont of Setback.
I
gl
. _ ~ sheet
1rE IIM
14b. MeasurerAnt of Haight
SIGN
f
f
Cart IIM
ogre
r C• t rY ~7R!."i . ~ ~~1 t ri'~i' F"'-.t7P.'fi:'.°'~,^' r. r.. e~ t:.tm, I'ryr ~ "'Ra 'j~#'P,kfir"f
144. 80%bM*" C14s><SOX00 i0a4
40
400
"W" hM
30
aci-
1
T
Crt! i IM
f 14d. Visibility point
V~Nty
G~
O
10
setback
40' line r
Street ~r
vigWNly point
{
PAGE 23
1 l Y • {i. , .5~ ~,^^9i„^F F_ _fi F ° wx. i av ry' ~Ti y ~ T". 7 ..Mi 4i Y ~T,}~`9~4`S!n' Tfl"}ii 1
k
SECTION IY.
That the definitions of various typo signs of Article 12 (51)
t.-+,►ugh ($9.1) of Appendix 1-Zoni69 of the Code of Ordi"aass of
the City of - Denton are hereby repealed in their entirety{ said
i
numbering to be reserved for future use.
-SECTION V,
That Article 19 C of Appendix I-Zoniag of the mode of Ordi-
nanoes of the City of Denton relating to special development
signs is hereby repealed is its entirety; said paragraph C to be
reserved for future +±ee.
S€CTION V1.
That Article 27 (52) of Appendix g-Zoaiag of the Ode of
Ordinances of the City of Denton defining "sign" if' hereby
repealed in its entirety; said number reserved for futyve use.
Sg,CTION vz
That Section S•4 of Article I of Chapter 5 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton relating to permits for signs is
hereby repealed in its entirety, said section number to be
reserved for future use,
SECTION VIII,
That "I, Sign and Identification Uses" of Article 7 of
Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances ,f the City of
Denton, Texas is repealed in its entirety,
SECTION IX.
Any person who shall erect, construct, locate, place, main-
tain, keep or make use of any sign in violation of any provisions
of this ordinance or otherwise violate s provision of this
ordinance, or who fails to comply therewith or with any of th.t
requirements t hareaf, or of a permit issued therounduu, shal' be
I 1
guilty of a misdaswanor punishable by a 'fine not exceeding Two
Hundred Dollars ($200,00), taah such parson shall be deemed
guilty of a separate offense for each and every d&V or portion
thereof during which any violation of this ordiaance a committed,
or continued, and upon conviction of any Yuen violations such
person shall be punished within the limits above.
pAGt 24
'.r+15f"'^~}"A"'asr... +vk. rrg rn,; rr 3'r "75e#'~".`T'~mj
77, i
,F2
That if any sections subsection, paretraph, seacaa461 clause,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
person of oiromastaaca is, held invalid by any court of ooa al
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
reaainiag portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
City of Denton, Taxes, hereby' doe 4 ss it would have enacted such
remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION X1.
All ardtaaace~ or parts of ordinances in force when the pro-
visioos of this 8rdiaonoe become' effective which are inoonalsteat
or is conflict with the taeas' or provisions contained in this
ordtaoaae era hereby,repeala•d to the extent of any such conflict,
SECTYOl1 XI1.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
frois the date of its passages wad the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the data of
its passsge.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1984.
KLMARD U, , MXTM
CITY OF DENTON, TEAS
ATTEST;
SMETART
CITY OF DENTON,~TUAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
0. S. TAYLOR 'A CITY A*ORNEY
CITY OF DENT&I, AXA3
BY.
PACE 2 i
October 20 1984
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Receive Report of Water Treatment Plant Expansion Study.
SUMMARY:
Freese Is Nichols, Inc,, Consulting. Engineers, have
completed the Water 't'reatment plant Expansion Study, The
Study indicates that improvements to Denton's exist'in
plant to upgrade it from a 24 million gallon per day' (mobf
plant to a 30 MGD plant is reqquired as soon as possible.
The Study also recommends the addition of 2 million gallons
of ground enragge at the existing plant, addition of a
largger pus at Lake Lewisville raw water station And the
addition o a high pressure puap at the existing raw water
plant,
The Study redowsods that a new water;b ant is required by
the late 1950's and that it would b most economical to
build a new 12 MCD plant in the northwestern part of the
City with a raw water 'pipeline to Ray Roberts Lake. This
looatidn would take advantage of the 110' additional
elevation o Ray Roberts Lake over Lewleville Lake and save
on pumping costs. A cite in northwestern Denton would also
gave on the sixe o1. water distribution pipes required
between the present plant and the northwestern part of the
City.
Attached are excerpts from the Stu,ly showing past and
projected water requirements, the seven alternative new
plant site locations studied, the tabulation of economic
analysis of the seven sites, and Freese and Nichols'
recommendations,
ACTION REQUIRED:
Receive report and provide input.
Respectfully,
R E. Nelson
Direetor of Utilities
EXHIBIT,1 Misc. Excerpts from Water Treatment Plant
Expansion Study-1984
11 City of Denton Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Study-1974 Froese & Nichols Ine.
3216U:18
r~ . - 7777-,
<ai
17
historical „Miter U 1
Year around surface Tgqtal Average Peak Ratio
Mater Tatar l:iniihed Day Day Peak-04y
L&Y1..._ Water
_ L"PJ. Aver tofal-RIJ
1970 3.106 21369.345 2,379.451 6.50 13.725 2111
1971 13.861 21450,863 2,464.724 6.75 15,052 2.23
1972 13,317 2,608.503 2,621.820 7.18 15.117 2410
1973 2.315 2,421,34 2,423.469 6.64 12,175 1.83
1974 26.041 2,527:958 2,553.999 7.00 15.735 2125
1978 24.614 2,5966463 2,621.077 7418 14,523 2.02
1976 0.633 2,630.151 20630.984 7.21 144650 _1195
r 1477 8.922 2,862.842 2,891,764 7192 14.341 1.82
1978 0 3,116,325 3,116.325 8.'54 16.466 1193
r
1979 0 2,849;033 21849,033 7.80 14.550 1.87
1980 75.357 3,290,189 3,365.546 9,22 18.067 2.05
r
1981 41.465 21520.077 2,567,542 7.03 15.403 2.19 ;
two new power 'plants to be completed in the middle 1980's. After that
time, utilization of the existing plant will be limited to peak demand
r periods, and it is anticipated that a majority of the water necessary
for cooling water will be supplied by treated wastewater effluent.
r f~
r
3.4 i
;:2
a
HISTORICAL, AND Plt &CTEO PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION
d gas o~"f~ H ii
Poo
2 /p NpR~Oft0
0000,
w X50 00010
0000,
/000
o
o°
1910 1lr0 few 2000
m~
YtAR
w o- M INYORICAL PER CAPITA *AYtR USAOt
A
Table 6
P i
Service O c , o Ime
n n, 4r #00 rqy O)
Ysar Population ` 02r,") itions D t Conditions
P*rCappi AV 9, ` P"iK arx Par Capita AV O. Peak x.
Consuoption DAi l Day 'Hourly Consumption Bally Boy Hourly
cd _ [Haul, j~ (Map) (REA) (NO) (MO)
1980 50,438 168 8.5 18.2 19.1 188- 9.5 20.4 32.6
1985 66,400 176 11.7 25.1 40.2 196 13.0 28.0 44.8
x
x 1990 82,200 183 15.0 32.3 51.7 203 16.7 35.9 57.4
a 1995 102,300 i88 19.2 41.3 66:2 208 21.3 45.7 73.2
Y
2000 122,200 193 23.6 50.7 81.1 213 2610 56.0 89.5
w ,
.
KAI 01
Y0. ~ .
WNTON
notm
wa ""M
00 ^W OUT
=9 A
ww Ti1fATMfMT ;
V+ / KART 4 ,A,~ f
mot"
~ McwAAwwA r;.~r:~',7r~~Hrsups
RM %MPI* Lwft
I _ CITY OF DENTWO
~ " OpOMIT10N . ,
MEw + Niir,r.►ri"
Al►NV MtATER 5lll~pl,if
"y M" K"No 51/S1`EMS
To.ww MwMEh Ylk`ATMEt~T PLANt
At t McfEm slTe,
10
~ AL.*Ef~NA'1`NE M►i
"46 1
,
F
k 7 ii lI I .t ...t WR ~ ^I" 1 I r •f {iY. .i.: . 'h~.
(
I
lir
owned `property iow"Jot'sly east of the presot tits, For
purposes of cmveison of'olternativeso conltlructlon'of a
now 12 NO water treatment plant is planned in 19t1il1
5. SusuM of Alternative Casts f
Table 11 is a capital cast summary of Alternative No, It
Tables 12 onia 13 pro#ent annual operating coats for Route
M ,
A and Route B.
M Table 1
Alternative No. 1 Cigna) Cost Suwary II
Construction Co"trruucttion
1W Description Coat Cwt `
..ice I 1 I I~IiYill.
1, Iltt t Facilities and Channeliza- $ 2500000 $
tion at Ray Roberts
2. 'R j~ Rep rtaoo Station at 9660000 700,000
r
3. Pipetino from Ray Roberts 8,658,700 80896;000
4, Pipeline Easements 456,000 469,001)
5. Lewisville Raw Water Pump 2750060 MOM
Station and Modifications
6. upgrade Existihd Water Treatment 312260000 30226,000
P 1 ant to' 30 No
7. Construct new 12 MOD water 6,300 0 6,300.000
Treatment Plant ad scent to l~
present site (1988
Subtotal 62001601700 31908660000
Contin"roe o, Engineering, 3 024 2,97s,900
f' . 100
Adoiinistration•O 16%
Tot a1 Estimated Construction Cost 423,184,800 6220845,900
r
6.7
i Ntq[ AMb NW01, 1R
1
I i a 11 i• I/
r f x iii 'y;:nC a 1 Ntli 1 f{ it
II )fl J
r
S -w, m i s s s ► INNrr`
t
u ~~,4C' it rl~~`
aAlwYr1N {aENTON I' ~ ~I l r . 1
~INTM11 ~ATfll / Ilt'r Z
IM 11~11r ftAW r r ~
l
` 'IooIfTm"'
' c.
aunt A
mom
"W~ t
0* /ume
6 se
so AIN Low
~ , '~I IItMT } Yet
ftw
t \
r
\ r ~ !j
1 4.
• 1 r~r
` CITY OF DEWON
%Vfty
ww' SIw"
r • =t Aa.TtIMlAt~
l ,C 3' r; , c it ~r>': ~ 1 l } 3~ r X16 , A. ? : 1( i~~~ ~ i } h t17, 'i~,"1 S 4. ,1 °1.1 ~.f~, •~f '
~.r.,a-•er~.-+-.v :r. vc vi'F^!.vxy+M% r.. r+*r?'. 7177
AljjMoti,=M4, _oital cos ry
Route A Rout* 6
I Construction Construction
I G~scri ion _C2,01Cost
1, Inlet Facilities and Chinnili:a- 6 2600000
tion at Ray Roberts
2, Raw Water Pump Station at 9650000 700,000
Ray Roberts
3. Raw Mater Pipeline 190,000 700,000
4. erTr an} Plant 6,300,000 6$00,000
I L Treated Hater Pip01`ine 663690000 51165,400
64 44in9 existing Mater treatowrt 3,226,000 392260000
P1 ant to 30 no
I 7, lewi wili• Raw Mater Pump Station 276,000 275,000
Modifications
8. Pipeline Eas"Mots „w , 4k.00Q 247 'j
Subtotal 3164199000 616,613,400
Conti~~nCie$, E sneering, 2,522 900 .2,492600 "1
Adaih ~ttration ! 6%
I
Total 619,3410900 619,100,400
E
I,
6:14
p
Ay;
~111~1r1~ ,
wud w6 'H
UF.NTON
Irmo Ism
/ / IMIYIOE M an"
W P""LIL t
/I OMM 'rATi11 4M1d W
AN wwl f7 y
I ouc+a►TwN CITY OF, DENTON
w Mw r~ow RAW WATER $tPLY
~p m►~ ALt~MA'y'~ME
4
BURL 9
w'
I
T 1
A, ltrr~&Xj yg_3i Cgital Cool $Jgfty
It" i construction Cost
1. Raw Water Pipeline $ 700,000
21 Water Yre~ pt Plant 6,3000000
1260 WD 1m) j
3. Treated Water Pipoiins 5,165,400
4, "&-adinp Existing Water Treatment 3,226,000
Plata to 30 ft j
3. li~l11 yillt Raw Water Pump Station 275,000
Modi~~a+~tions
6. Pip 114ra Easements 241A
$up tl 315,913,400
Conlt vk s, E inarinp, 2,387,000
Ginistratian 6 15%
Total 31a,30o,400
.I
I.
1
c j
ik 4
i
5.20
4 .
iN[f9f ANI"rt[ ~Ui S NC
wpm
%
r v. r11 '
nENTON
`•`--.ter f I l Nf
I-i I
~TMAT11~ CANT ' T 4 1 1
taw
am wn
'"'fir t
"AIL"m VAT,
i ~ TrcNT
ww POW sm"
Lft
00 to LOU.
f,.
' U
CITY OF DWON
°ESCta►~aw, RAMP WATER SUPPLY
Lowtv WAR o arr SYSTEMS
rto sr wcw ALTM AYM We
• ~ ~ nn►ron w mom" tw
. ~ IF'~iiUFlE
1
i t 1 1 f ~ ,q1 I r$, Vi 1 :'k.. A' r[✓c ~AV Ir 1> 1a(le ~'~rt
~~J1~y 'v3'~ 4'•
Sl~~l.~. I,vY.I.~„iz, h. 61r'u2it8l'[~ ,5'~R~`f~#3i(~ f 1. y{ f4 n.. iK- z ~1~'1'i„ .f 1 ~ 11 V
P l
Altsrn+~tivd No. 5 Cost #us~~
Route A gouts 0
construction t Construction
es ~
tnlst Facilitiat and Chann4li=s- # 260,000 #
lion at pay Robdrts
2. Row Water pop Station at 985,000 x00,000 `I
pay pobarts
3. Pt no 505490000 6,666,00
6,150,000 6,150,000
4! Water TmatMsht Plant
12.0 MGO (190) 4
3 226,000 3,226,000
6► 30 iistin9 Water Traats~nt
276,000 2750000 ii
I 61 Lewisville pop Station
I 7. Pip41ina Easswnts 23 0p 47`
Subto al #12,W- 44L0 #12 m
1 ContilNw fs, f inssrtnq►
Adisinistration f 15aC
Total #19,169,400 #16,932,900 E
i
l~
1
;I
6.26
",s
••''t :Y-. : 1iq,. ~ _ i''''.S 1 t'1 Ir1~~np' :J.Y ri j(":'il tvry.2.r Y4{ E~;f
yi f y r ~ irA}o 4.x.,r. U=` Nh` !1 '~'rte t
wwr ,lmmw^ . w■t , ~w : w1~~ wow aw ww .w.w s ~ws..., ~1~'
DEN?ON \ f ' kk5~, . /
t,
~,o host ern Ht S..
t
wM d'
MIAftA ' IM~~IMATtI1pumLiAL
ow ATIOM / j ••,r
"Jj
till
` CITY OF DENTON
NEW~r ww~ mw mra« RAW WATER St f'LY
SYSTEMS
MANY 'a om f _ ALTENATIVE N0. 6
( y ,
~~~'dd~i~'ic'..nj~....~r7 ktio~`n~Ld~Jk~S.!,1:Lt.3~]'~i.:~~G 3e: ~i~lfaJe,4,iia''~.i1:e 11, :I,i .W1~1, r1. a„ c a ,.c',•Yi ~'~'h ..Sri .a`'~f~ j.;•`1.~k
'w "vy!r4,?s^r-laxa~.T~a~~yrc7a-~, ~~~n p~ x ^s,, A.. p'fl ~w
4 s,
r
Alta~„r 1Vi N0, a SIR1111 Cast $gem
;tom pescrivtion Construction Cost
LewisVille R+sw Water POP t 215,000
Station Modifications
1,480,000
2, w N lWitsr Puarp Station
6,734,000
3. P1P41'tna
~
4500000
4, Pipeline Eases~nt
I rads existing Water Tr atmint 3,226,000
5.
i I
prat to 30 FitiD i
64 coostruct new, 12 mm water
Treat t"t Plant ad scant to
Present site Ome
$18,465,000
Subtotal oq ~2,769,,,,~ 1
1 Co"ti r ration 0n15X rin0,
` Total x21,234,800,
i
6.32
10
d7 c Mgt" ,NO NICHOLS,
31, s,•n;1 .n r,r 1' ' r ..`r u, rvl r (,~r . i,Jr v . tiA'
l~r ~ .a'rp G..1~Tr {l 5 /i tmn I l
DENTON
r
l ;;N !,V
Ajr
V1
_ -
{ ~ STA I~OM~ RdY !?U6'f rS RE'S
1
r . 1 OF DENTON
CITY
ptlC11M~TION: RAW WATER SLN'PLY
} NEW, WATER TREATMENT, PLANT
SYSTEMS
04
ow JINN MMTEI! MlM1! lTAt10M ALTERNATIVE NO.T
ON RAY ROOE11T8 REl.
~ ONE o a Fiuc
FIGURE ►2
,r
,s'iv •i.
T~b~24
Altarnot Ito No 7 C !too Cost SUMO
Route' A Rout$ 8
Construction Construction
ost
1t~~ a~i~n Cost ,
Inlet Ficilities and Chmnnilixa- $ 250,000 5
1.
tion at Ray Roberts i
985,000 700,000
21 Now Mater puap Station at
Ray Roberts
50837,900 6,675,000
3. NOW Water Vipoline
Mater Tratant Plant 6,300,000 60300,000 !
72,0 MRD (,9d0)
Existirog Mater Tr"taht 5,226,000 302260000 j
5►
to 30 M$p
215,000 275,000
6. Sttation11Modiif citiO"
285 t
7. Pipeline E1360011ts 2w 85...
5170158,900 $1704610000
Subtotal 2.573.800 2.619.2x10
Contingencies, E sneering,
AdNinistrati¢° ~ 1
Total 319,7321700 $209080,200
't
1
l
6.36
' 'r p[ti[ iron nNsnOl s, Inc -
Y le
traction Coll Sumory of Al' tiv 410 In 1 tr i Savift"
Alternative Net Savihp Over Net Savioqps Total Net
~,ruoton.Cost Alternati. 1 Route _ internal Oil Alte~ rn- ti_ve WOO
Alternative No. 1
Route A ~23,><84,800 base valve brio value hose valve
Route B 22,845,900 $ 338,900 base value $ 338,900
Alto rnative No. 2 3,852,900 110100,040
Route B 19 4,952,900
Route A 19 341,4 40000 4,089,400 111001000 5,189,400
,105
c
x Alternative No. 3
Route A ' w 5,994,400
,Route B 18,?,00,400 4,894,400 191000000
Alter"tive "o. 4
5,189,00
061, to A - 1,089,40d 10100,000
Route B 19,10,00
Alternative No. _5 ,400
_ 4,025,+400 1100,000 5,1259400
Route A 19 169 4,261,800 1,100+000 50361,900
t Route 9 18,932,900
Alternative No. 6 21,234,800 1,9600000 base value 1,9601000
k Alternative No. 7 3,462,};40 3,175,000 6,637,100
Route A 19,732,700 3,175,000 6,289*600
Route 6 20,080,200 3911CO600
oo' ,
71
The current growth treWS indicate that Denton should reach an
h annual aver&O water-use population of approximately 122,200 by the yt+er i
' 2000. This includes service to portions of Corinth &M Argyle within
Denton's certificate of Co"Vehianco service area.
The projected 'potenti0 average daily finished water requir"a is
under drouth conditions is 26.0 000 and the potential peak-day and
maximum-hour are 56.0 MGO and 89.5 MW respectively, Tha future raw
F water rogireswnts should average approximately 3X more than the finished
water requirements. The steam electric generating plant cooling water
will`be obtained from the wastewater traatment plant effluent.'
The Ray Roberts Reservoir will'provida an additional water supply
source which could be' available for service, after partial filling,
about iW to 1949 depending on si&6641 'inflows alter completion of
canstruction.
Prior to the availability of Rey Roberts Reservoir, the present
water treatment facilities will be required to sleet all water demands
from Lake Lewisville.
The projected potential peak-day water demand in 1987 is 31.2 MGO,
the exiiting raw water system is not capable of furnishing this future
potential peak-day demand. It is recoMmirsded that the two smaller raw
water Pi001 be riplaced with two larger pumps approximately the same
` size as t}* two existing larger pumps. The new pumps should be equipped
with either two speed motors `or variable speed drives so that the lower
demands can be more efficiently handled. The-increased capacity' of the
modified pump station should provide a total pumping capability through
r' - - - - k11[t N'.Ntl NGMQIf~' 1NC'-.. - -
the year may,' gowever, the fires caoaeity of the iodifIad station would
only be 80""to through the year 19644 The use of a raw water terminal
stora{N reservoir could extend the firm capability of delivering raw
water to the City through the year 1987. It is recommended that a 13,8
million gallon raw water terminal storage reservoir and 4.5 MO low lift
pump station be constructed on City owned property immediately east of
the water treatment' plant, The storage reservoir would also serve as an
emergency supply of raw water and would allow more energy efficient
off-hour pumping.
The existing water treatment plant has a rated capacity 'of 16 NW. ~
newer and more ef-
The plant could be wnovated to take, advantagm of
fectiw methods of water treatment. In recent years, the techholoo of
water treatment design has made siginificant advances. Mang the thaeges
which 'have octurred is the ability to increase the'pfo"tion cap-
abilities of existing facilities through what is termed "high-rate"
technology, Using this approach, it would be possible to convert the
exerting 'plant from its present rated capacity of 16.0 ON to a
"high-rstO co, Aci ty of 30.0 M00,
A 30.0 MlO water treatment plant renovation plus the 4,0 NO of i
well capacity, will be sufficient to provide tho projected peak-day
demands through 1989,
ititi e
t
1
, fa
and supply
, ua. ti
on of "'alternative water production
1901 s
show' tMt a new ulster treatment pliant with a direct water supply from
My Roberts Reae,woir is cost effective. The'', most cost effective
location appears to be along the northwestern boundary of the City in
the proposed upper pressure plane. The final detarmination of a
_ ~ fP1lfC AIId 'NKMO iMC
tr"t""'t plant site will be 000.014i tt upon Petin0014rtt of 'Oftecto, on''the
inMrnal water distribution syst and aA luatioq of potential cites far
suitable topography, water line routing, sludge disposal, Wass and
service utllitios. The 'finol site determination should also consider
the possibility of supplying water to incorporated' cities contiguous to
the genton service area.
The major cities which would appear to warrant investigations as to
water needs are the Cities of Sanger, Krum, Aubrey, Pilot Point and
i
Krugervillo. The Texas OepartMant of Water Resources, Planning and
Developaw t Division, has published projottions of population and
omieipol water needs far the Cities of Sanger aM Pilot Point through
the year 2,"O.
Table 31 presents projections of population and mwnicipel water
i
needs o tM potenttli 'Water custasers $40ously mentioned. The
proiactibns for Krum,.Aubrey and Krugorville were based on the saw
growth rate as Pilot r6int.
Although the total water requirement from those areas are a small
percentoge of the city of Denton pro,fected total water demand; water
sales to those areas may influence final site selection. A detailed'
site study will be conductep as a second phase and supplement, to this
study. The Photo It sitra shady can. inclucM a more detailed investi-
gation of the impact of the'eA areas'on the project location end cast.
The recommended construction stichedulfoo for water treatment ,f*-
cili'ties is listed below, Consideration has been given to 'expansion
staging and:'^eMatod construction at shorter intervals is not tonsidared
-cost effective due to iticreasing'inflation and escalation.
8,3
i - rnetsi Alv NitHC Af n+a
bb
i i. ' 1' ..~P:.., +R'"P,°T*1` rrwi°`FW .:F., ..-.f,. ~'?Tr'Tr~
Ilk's a
your r-or Cguollal r : ra
A L U2L 2W 2010 420 20M
Sanger
PoQp'ulation 2574 32,57 4022 $263 6523 7834
trio 276 .55 691 .904 1112 1135
GPCO 147.1 X69.0 171.9 171.9 171.9 171,8
Pilot Point
IE
Population 2911 2,34a 2422 3169 3928 4717
No .343 , 409 .428 156 .695 834
oft 15613 172,9 176.8 176.9 176.9 176.$
Kruo
917 971 1004 1313 1627 1954
itlatloo
.142 165 .178 232 .286 .345
155.3 172.9 176.8 176,9 176.9 176.8
Aubr4y _
f Population 948 1004 1038 1358 1653 2021
E !A(ip ,147 174 ,184 .240 .298 , 357
Gko 155.3 172.9 176.8 176.9 116.9 176.8
Krugerville I
P 2 ulation 469 497 514 672 833 1000
' .073 .086 1091 .119 .147 ;177
GPCD 155.3 172.9 17618 176.9 176.9 176,8
8.4
VMK91t ANO NIGN011 rNG
eth
1pt } -el 5l~S n • 1. v
9
y 11
Exi et1 nO Maur
Year Mi+~k-Digt
flow Tv"to"t Plant Iiabr l'reatawnef PII"t
14 26 5 (14 Pi renovation)
30. E
k
19 29, M 30.0
6 $010
19ly 31.2 30.0 - I
(12,0 DOW plant)
19AA` 32.7 30.0 124
1949 34,3 3010 12.0
1991 37, 9 0, 0 12.0 3
1992 3968 30,00.
1993 41.8 30.0 12.
(8,0 No 0 oaWon)
1995 43.7 30,0
a~96 4~41, a 30.0 6
1997 ~49,a 30.0 0,0 MA41~'0 seen)
19y~ $119 30,0
19l9 0.9 30.0
2000 $6,0 30,0 2810
In 'order to Not fire insurance and State requirements for ground
storage, an additional 2 million gallon ground'storage tank at the water
treatment plant is recommended. This additional storage will satisfy a
water use population of about 61swo.
` The estimated total capital cost for construction of thr phase 1
recommended 1994 improvements is $4,0260150. A detailed cost breakdown
is given in Appendix A. The Phase 2 1 rovaments wi11 consist,of
PIP
development of the Ro Roberts treatment facilities by 1988 and will
depem on final site selection to be performed as a supplement to this
1
report. •
The above cost does, not include 'that 'required for construction of
intarnal water distribution system improvements necessary to provide
effective and economical operation of the distribution system.
- 8.5
:;i tN L[Si ANb HM H0491 :IC
1
4 t 710775,, 7
777.
„y~M~Y1 ~
I
Yuir;l 2914
C4464, 'a6`gv6ged Loo the st"y bession at S130 p,a. in the
it W40,00 hood.
Mi1Nra~g
MESSNT1 Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro' Too Chew; Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdass, Aiddlesparger and Stephens
city Manager, Assistant City Attorney and City Secretary
ASSENTt Bone
1. Tno Council considered the 1984 Denton Development (hide
update.
Steve Fanning, Planning and Community Development mtaff, reported
that the primary goal of the work session was to umderstand the
density concept. The Council needed to revise the Denton
Development Guido which was used as a tool for dnvAlopmant and
offered guidance to staff, The central points on the intensity
issue werao
1, the intensity planning concept
2. the chosen intensity standard compared to current trends in
urban dsvolopoent
3. that traditional district toping could not and would not
control city-wide land use growth structure intensity
planning was used to provide a Rood, euatainabls sconosio growth for
the city. It was also utod to pprovidectti ens with the capahiltly
to iet across town to work, shop, oto. staff was currently
usint a general sap of the intensity areas and the Denton
Development Guido in planning.
Fanning tnen presented slides of the current intensity map for
- Denton No reported that there were sevoroi intensity enncepts from
which to, chose to #valuating new dovolopgonts. The basi4 olsments
for growth were transportation and utilities. laproper- or.
unbalanced intenaity could cause poor land use and transportation
probletes. Area concentrations would have to be controlled to have
offectivs planning.
As now developments were proposed, staff considered the intensity.
impact. Staff first looked at parcels in 640 acre increments and at
natural or ran-,tads barriers. Parcels in 40 sere increments were
considered next. When an area was 9stablished, calculations were
made based on traffic generated by the current zoning (retail zoning
created the highest traffic use, somewhat lose for cospercial, and
even less for -residential). Consideration was given to tripe
generated by existing land use, trips reserved for vacant land, and
trips generated by the proposed development to the unused traffic
capodity. ' Th.- current ' intensity in Down,as c red to
traditional _standards$ showed that low intensity ~,ras 0~ above
standard. The regional economy "ispaeted local growth and
transportation and utility policies shaped growth" but could not
control it.
The Council then began a die6ussion of the items being r,svised, On
issue 41, "How isportent are' the 'intensity polfcies" Fanning
reported that the, staff, first would look at the AreaooviA impact,
not the site impact, in' order to have a. broad strategy for a
structured' plan, The Planning find zoning Corslission recommendation
was for staff to continue to emphasize the 'intensity aspect,
Mayor SteOort stated that he believed this was a good plan which
kept pace with current trends,, Developers were wanting to place
comaeretal and retail zoning o'i arterial stroete which would ruin
the transportation flow.
•,.S z .'~11-5 r~~sm tr s" r`.~rtF ,
r , 9
i
Jul i 1 64
hrri 'rM4 I
Cougpf~l,, Ne4Lex. 94OW stated that the, staff woo says that the
in ehswity oil d, would be (Or the entire area 1i0 not the
ppa tiouiar deount site within the area. Dew lopMent in
p
it ividual arose would be on a "first come, first served" basis.
fonning responded that this would be a method to avoid the problem
Dallas was now experiencing with cumulative toning.
Robert Lalorte, Chatrperson of the Planning and Boning Commission,
stated that there already was ouaulAtive Bonin`` in Denton and it
could not be controlled unless planned development toning was used,
Andy Sidor, Planning and 'Zoning Commiasion, stated that a time limit
could be 'attached to all planned deVSlopoonts. If the planned
development was not underway to 3 yeses, the toning would revert
back to the previous Boning classification.
Council Member McAdams stated that she believed the intensity
standard was very important as it would allow the Council and staff
to look for future transportation problems and avoid them.
fanninngg rrporte4'that a time limit en the planned development toning
classiftoattoe wa a good idea for tfio short term. for the long
term planning of ~nton , the toning ordinance should he amended to
eliminate oumul tive Boning and to overlay the intensity as a
perforreaoe standard over the toning districts.
till Claiborne Planning and Zoning Commtselon, asked '.f there would
be any flexibihtr in the aria lines on the intensity map that staff
had drawn.
Fannin$ responded that `these intensity areas would be met by the
City Council. !loving the area lines would be sov'ewhat of a
jud``ement call. 'The major thorougharea in the city -.ore fairly
rigid.
Council Hosbar McAdams stated that a spvoial joint seating should be
held with the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission to
discuss only the update to the Denton Development Guide,
The Counoil convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal
matters, real astete, personnel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
The Council then convened into the Regular meeting at 1:00 in the
Council Chambers,
MEMAEIIS
PRESENT: Ma or Stewart; Mayor Pro Tea Chew; Council Members
Al ord, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlespergar And Stephens
City Manager, Assistant City Attorney and City 'Secretary
ASSENT. None
Mayor Stewart asked the members of the audience to stand and observe
a moment of silence in memory of City Attorney 0. J. Tavlor.
Mayor Pro Tea Chew offered a prayer.
1. Consant Agenda
Council Member Hopkins asked that items 1.8,1, 1.B.2, and 1.E be
removed from the consent agenda.
Stephens motion, McAdams second to approve the Consent Agenda with
the exception of items 1.0.1, 1.8.20 and 1.E. Motion carried
unanimously.
9".771r
C01t~0~l, M~M►~et
lieei o! vly 1791914
T4
C 11 lles r Mopkias ewate~ ttlat he has askfrd..tor' iteMe 1.M~1 Ahd
I MM b,f ve4oved so that he could cosseend staff on she line ' job
whioh had bee done on the paisley Street water line and the Tench
~Catates sewer ins.
No kins motion, Chew second to Approve items 1.8,1 and 1,8.2.
?boon carried unanimously.
Council Mtmtor Hopkins stated that he would like for the Data
Processing AdvisoBoard to review and give A. recommending on item
1,10 the upgrade to the Wang word processing system,
Cityy MAna er Hartung responded that in the past the Data Processing
Advisory Board had not routinely reviewed vord processing issues.
Hopkins motion, Chew second that item 1.E be remanded to the DP
Advisory Board for a recommendation, Motion carried onantanualy.
Consent Agenda:
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;
1. Aid N 9294 - Trenoher/backhoe
2. Bid y 9298 - Panhandle drainage improvements
3. Bid N 9301 - Circuit breaker conversion
4. Bid 9303 Pneumatic roller
5. Bid Y 9304 - Pump repair parts
6. Bid ! 9305 - Miscellaneous electrical parts
7. Purchase Order #'63900 to Stewart an.t Stevenson
in the Amount of $31315.60,
S. Plats and Keptats:
14 Q"o ider approval of the preliminary plat of the
Northridge Subdivision, lots 4.13, block 2, (The'
P'lannin and Zoning Commission recommends
approvat.)
2. Consider approval of the preliminary And final
replat of the LSSWY Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.) -
3. Consider approval of the final roolat of the
Adkisson Addition, (The planning and zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
4, Consider approval of the preliminary n plat of the
Carroll Point' Addition. (The g and toning
Commission recommends approval.)
5. Consider approval of the, preliminary ppl~e~t of the
Windsor Park Addition, Section It. (ic Planning
and Zoning Wmuiasion r9c6mmands approval.)
6. Consider approval of the final replat of the
Lincoln Park Addition. (The Planning Avid Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
7. Consider approval of thepreliminary plat of `t `!e
St. Andrews Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
C. Contracts:
1. Consider approval of an' Independent Contractor
Agreement 'rith Wade Migr+r for thapections,
r,.
'7"r.°' +'FP` 'e spy.; i aiVF*"., V 1 r
14 qit~r loou+N011 Niap +stt
~ag sMtir 4ri JJulr lty l9gM
• st~ A. Riaal PaymAnts~
conai'dor 'approval of final pay0oat to ON'/W
Construction' Company for Paisley StreKt
62SSlli~ project Bid M 9250, Purchaso Order N
?T'ho public Uttlitio~ Board recommends
approval.}
2, Cons tdor . approval of final -payment to Dickerson
construction Company for Rench Estates Sevor` Line
Project, Sid M 9138, Purchase Order f 48171.
(The Public Utilition Board recommends approvel.)
B. Consider approval of an upgrade to tho Wang Word
Processing Systam, *Chn upgrade will include a CPU
uppdAto► softKaro' and all peripherals needed to extend
the system. (R1~i11iDED TO HE DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY
BOARD 8011 RRCONMe"VATION.)
L. Ms, Barbara Gailoy appeared before the Council requesting
consideration for the. regulation of abortion clinics,
Ma+ llaill'y stated that this was controversial but she felt vary
strongly '~hat the Oity needed to address the is' suo as it Msa a
alien ,ho ~?oaust ropre'onti the murder of l.5 million babies, par
year, 8hc'tlleq'!►skal tFtiASe ta'ths sudtinoe in'sUpppport of re$ulatti6n
abortion clinics 0', stand Ms. Gail y stated' that Denton had
been a landnr ofother csties and 'she k6411d like to' see Denton tskt*
r+ ' a stand, on'~,,abortion. Iho federal' ruling in 1473 did not afford
conatitu'tional tights to the unborn ohild, A pregnancy was
S, terminat44 avety' X21 s*~ o}1ds in the United • States, Mo. Gailey
further stated that she would like to see "ordinances adopted tha,
would require the moths ,be info,vsod of options, to abortion, to
tenuit'o the.oothor be inf4ri►ad of exacr abortion procedures, trj
proitibid " eho. sale atd disposition of aborted i~AEusea for
exportmentatiotl or other uA0i, to require the aborted fetus be
' buried by state.,burial 1ltande~rds, and to prohibit the distribution
of ;tax moony to, groups whhich support or perform abortions, Me.
Galley concluded by appl,aling to the Council to step out and take
the lead on this issue.
Mayor Stewart 'roadgnized a representative from the National `
Organization of Women to speak in rebuttal.
Ms. Cathy Edwards, representing NOW, atated that it was not her
intention, to debate morality. Ms, Sdwards distributed samples ;nf
ordinances prohibiting and/or regulating abortion which had Mien
overthrown by the Supreme Court,
3. Mr. John Shrader appserad before the Council requesting
roimburseoant by the City to the Denton County Historical Commission
for the cost of the puiohase of the fire DopArtoont hook and ladder
truck "01'd 14".
Mr. Shr4der statad~that,ithe sale of "Old 14" wed before the Council
in 1971'1 At that 'time," citicens appeared with a petition signed, by
over 25,0 people requesting the Council reconsider and not to Nell
the hookand ladder' truck at auction, In June of this year 74he
fi'r'e Ciuok had bead gold at auction' to Mr Roddy of Corinth. Mr.
t'. Roddyl had in eurq'4ald,the it bank to the Denton County HiatoAcal
r, Shridsr statud'tKat he hold many' fond mesaorieii of
Commission. Mr.'
"Old 14"'and the hook: and ladder' truck had saved many structures
from fire. The Historic& Commission should be commendad for saving
i't 'ltor the County and' i there was any way possible, Mr. Shrader
' would like to see that they were reimbursed for the cost.
Cai~ncil Morbor NcAeams asked when the truck had boon bought..
Snradet responded in 1935 for $5,822,66 and had been replaced in
a: 1974. The truck sold for approximately $4,200.
a.
~1` ' * , .'t9i r1"" dF %'9~S .a~~ r-5`'1?si+l'.s i.t..~n. ` ! f 1`• F3*: 11
41 1~
5
' I
i N iwit*•
, Gbuao 1 i
' A* of July l°J► 19a4
rein Five
Coutla 114 Wt 4041osperjer hate4:00 ho,. Dior not a%iari that,t the
fix cook %104 to bo Mold end would do whetevor he Gould to sea that
the ,Denton county Ois'toriapl Commission was reimbursed the purchase
price.
Mayor Stewart statoA thak the quebtion of the 1*5<ty of the City
re bursing the cost would have to be reviewed.
Council Member RoPkine asked if any thought hod been given to where
the truck would be kept.
Mr. Wader raaponded that the truck was presently being kept in the
old drive-in facility of the First $tate bank. The truck did not
now nor would it over again run but could be used for fire
prevention week and other similar uses.
4. Ms. Mar aiat brown appeared before the Council rrqueating
that the 7200- block of broken Arrow Lane be olnsed at both ends
between the hours of 5100 p,*, and 9100 p,a. on July 20, 1964 for a
neighborhood block party.
Me. brown stated she was requesting the closing of the street for a
neighborhood "get together". The neighbOrs had been contacted and
f approved. This would not affect traffic on any other street.
The 0e04ena40 of the Council was to, approve the NOg at and have the
City Secretary place this iteg,on the agenda for July Ay for action.
54 The Council cohsiderbd removing the prclisrinary plat of the
Morse Street Addition from the table.
Hopkins aotiono'McAdams second, to remove the preliminary plat from
the table. Notidn.carried unanimously.
64 The Council considered approval of the preliminary plat of
the Morse Street Addition.
David Ellison, 'Development Review PlannerAd reported that the
Planni and Community Development staff not have any new
information to bring before the Council on this plat.
Assistant City :"'l.~ager Rick. Svehla reported that Willow Crook
emptied onto Kerley street in this area. Thirty lots would be Added
to the addition.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that there was a very sharp curve in this
area which was dangerous when two vehicles were trying to negotiate
tao curve at the same time. If the plan were changed to have an
exit off :-)f Morse Street the developer would only lose one lot,
David ElliAon responded that if this was done, the lot depth would
not conforo to the subdivision rules and regulations and would
require a variance. j
Mayor 'Pro rim Chow stated that either way it was handled the
developer would still lose one lot.
Chew motion, Hopkins 'second to approve the preliminary plat with s
cul-de-sac at the and of Scott Street.
Council Member Stephens stated that the final plat for the addition
was approved in 1971. The existing curve in this area was very
sharp.
Svehla responded thst if this 'preliminary plat was approved, the
City would in tall si no to warn vehicles of the curve as they
apprioachid.' ds+{oloper co%lld not appreciably alter the ; plan
without 10410 several' otr and there were existing homer in place.
This ppIan'wou~d extend the subdivision to Scott Street and provide
for additional lots. ;
1
o-
~ ~ ~ k~ ~ ~ ~.f1 ~ .~Q r~ t r ~ p^k^ ~ rr~ h'i`4~'•~-+~+g.q~rk~ wr'ry A r~~^r f
' CiC~r Cevtlnil' Nin~t~+l
gitfta~~ of July
? dye 3lx'
CtiwaoiI Koob*V 110ptin• stated Cask ohl-deosaos were ltm! ed to 1440
feet by the subdivision'rulps and vsgulattons and asked iT this cul-
de»sac would akoeed th&t limit,
Svehla responded yes.
Mayor Pro Us Chew stated that he believed Scott Street should be
opened at one end and have ,4 cut»de,ssc at the other.
Council Member McAdams staled that the Council was trying to alter
the plat. If the plat met`Aagal requirestents, they could not alter
it,
Mayor Pro Tee Chew stated that the Council would be adding a
condition.
Vote on C}►ey's action ftiled 5 to 2 with McAdams, Hopkins, Alford,
liiddlesperser and Stewart voting nay; Chew and Stephens voting aye.
Council Near HcAdams stated that she aasusfed,that negotiations
with the developer had been atteYpted and had failed,
rilison responded that alternatives had been discussed and the
developer did not indicate a willingness to change the plat.
Council Member Stephens asked whet the liabiltty'to the City would
bi,if Scott Stttot was opened to through traffic.
Svohla t'eippnded that the City Attorney would have to address that
issue.
Stephens, motion, Alford, second to refer the plat to the City
Attorney and the City engineering staff for study. !lotion carried
unanimously.
7. Public Hohrings
A. The Council hold a public heario$ by the City of
b nton City Council with raapeot'to ilia iseuAnce of industrial
development bonds for Marketing and Research Cou"alors,'Inc. in an
aaount not to exceed $1,350,000.
The Mayor opened the public hearing;
City Manager Chris Hartung spoke in, favor reporting that this
particular issue had been before the (louncil earlier to designate
this site as : n eligible, blighted' area. Marketing and Research
j. Cbuneelots, Inq°; was now requesting Fhe'ieeuance of thA bonds. The
Denton Industr.dl Development Authority had net earlier in the day
and approved ti,e' ineuance.
John Lowery, Marketing And Research Counselors, Inc. 'appearad in
favor of the isauanca^of bonds reporting that his lift tad opened
the office in March. There were currently400 people on the payroll
on a part-time basis.
Council Member Hopkins asked Mr.' Lowery if his firs owned the
building.
Mr. Lowery responded yes.
Council Member Stephens asked if the firm 'plannad'on expanding and
possibly adding 'another building.
Mr. Lowery responded no; the projected Arowth of the fire over the
t next 12 Months would deplete the bond money.
f No one spoke in opposition.
j'
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
fY
a, , r
+F+.
I~f``, '.r`4 RI('Rd'v 9S~9'7?vl`/
i Lt , l t. QTY d f
fl,
Vii t r e ~ l~ ~
~I l
ds~. ~ t~y ~ut~g19114
7
NiNA~
nu* bands 1jAd boon
induitriar•w
u t•d t
t t
'`e t A t~
tFs%r'•u F Lx cWk: 1441yo AppraxiwAtoly 50 job$ had been
04 Woh
Or+Atad due to this project.
Duo to the, 4onneotion with this issue, Mayor Stewart moved agenda
item 94. forward.
y, b, xlk, Council considered Approval of a resolution of the
city of p nCgn, pity ,,Caunbii of `the City of 0oaton with respect to
ppht publl - h'eari i in "tharinin issue of bonds And approvins
dokusonts for MAr t nt and M!!ar counrmlore, Inc, to air Moun
not to exceed $10350,O
The following resolution was presentgdi
~ IGti THC CITYCOftlt, 4PP90VINO TNC 08PAANCE
to bA}lt.C1CY or 60104, INDUST91A4 DBVIlLO ENT
AP 110RITY to tINANCR A PA0i ZOT JOOR KARA TWOp1M~
S ARCH COUNS.Lfts, 11W. FOLOV W05ikW, by f'Aiidlution thA . City Coun it (the !'Coverain`
gpdr") of City, 0 Do Who 1'ex~• (the touthoris/d cad
appt~ovad tiler 00ioo b yM City a,Y Dootpn Industrial Dovelop"nt
Auth40,tt 0* d) as:, • i4onpeoiitindustrial dewlnp oot
oorpgrAt o a'„ua~x gtMVi+4ib~! 0f the MvalQplNnt Co ratign Act
o; 9~9;'1~tpil4r 19 ! Verngn a Mnotated Texas CivillotAtutea,' as
""t*4 (t4 bAct ) ~ anq
4111>k>IA$r by resolutln: adopted on` JAhuary 11, 19b4r the
x,eaµor, tfro~'o(17. irr4* indwiitrial developson#narevenu~l bonui on
~hklofgf t±i,4, (th*AWojo4t) tauag I*pltsh the specific publlic
pu oee for'4fiieh'tha toruot'w414 created; and
WllW,~the >t,x` wr pow'•deiirer to;prdvide for' the tssuance
and 'of itf''lndustitsl baoilop"ont ReWenae Aonds, Sarief, 1994
(NArk'4tingRbaArcoh Counselate , Inc, Project) (the "Bonds'), in
the **Aftirll~{ g.4rate :p.rinoipAl mount of $1,350,000, by adopting it
arol ched hereto as Exhlyit A
r`uti0n, lµ rtadtislly in the form atta
(the ~'kaAolution")i and
Vl t~A5, 'on July 084, the Unit held.: public hearing
A, 106aEibn,; Which, under ',the facts and eiroumstanees was
cd>ivepitt fot,rasidents of. the Unit, with respect to the, bonds and
the lro3014t,,011dwitig,publi6ation of raanonable publid notice in the
fors gttaat►!d hatoto as ;xhib:!t 5 (the "Notice") in compliance with
ratio 10 (k) of,Uio Internal Revenue Code of 1.954, as amonded (the
Code"?.; and
448AiAS) the Aaverning body is the elected legislative Hody'
of the Unitt ♦nd
"i
..Act provides that the Coven ng body must+ by
ti1HERF.A,'~, the,'
rialolution Adopted no, Sore the sixty (60) d6)II4 rior to the date of
delivery of the, 30a#s epeeif 41-ly apprdVa the resolution of. ,the
Issuer, providing for t isruanoa' of the 06iodo, and Section 103(k~~.
o tM Lod! OiOifes i'r11aC tltih "applicablA l acted reprerentative,
whicF 41'6 gel edt, t`of the bonds 'ts the Governing body, approve t11e
bondr as►d,,tha i~rojact, I)rior to ifruancei
1'N0Wl'1`ltS~~FOR40 bb IT RESOLVED BY N9 CITY COUNCIL OF 'CI'T'Y
of D0ftNs TE$A3, tMT.
1. This ! Resolution of the' Issuer providing for the sale
and issuance of the bonds, substantLklly in the form attached hereto
s Itechibt A, it hlxeby'approwd.
i
tr Y , Yr +i 7+ $~I77.~i 1 ~,~.~~~~~11{'37~`+,;e r '1~^""R'F!i'II5 ';i;P"{r r R~n'l .s { t, t1 y~ ~r
lE a r q1 r a t tp { , iY7 it It t +iY Y1:r
J 3 '•i V l~ ~ r 1 Y ,
3 ~~t s►t ,1uty x~, 19lir
•
` ~y !ra#`r r . ~Y1 ~~p ilia'A ly .g roV00,L bhe~
ends, • f d' v ~k (1 this 0440 end Gt1• piojo,ct,.
1 l ao Ri4x a 474 to'o Mtg#~Ok1A¢
ILI h¢Ato arh%xhPra.}aaC and the
A. vning goy #ind4 end `detoroino Eliot S
LuYVIhoranoe d! the, publiq.purpooes of Apt,
1148gf.D AND ALOPOVIb this 11th day of July, 1984,
Maeda s aiotiork, Chow second that the resolution be approved. On
It all vote, McAdAot "i►y to Ropk s' llayarid SMayor tephens lay*,"" t Alford
r toll Riddiespetger A o,
Non carried unanisious y.
The Mayor then returned to Public Heaejnga and the regular agenda
order,
bl The CounQil hold a publio hearing on the petition of
0eorgeHopkins reque tidg 4 clAftge; in %Oning on un approximate'ly
36, 2 coke . portion ot'; planned doWtopissnt (PD-12) beginning at the
,f southwest 'Cornet' of the 4-3 b, service road and State School koad,
T1te 4pp;roied PD,lx p+risits b ice qse on 171407 acres. and a 100 cost
rastaurtat And 270 iiulti•feiiL y nnNs tin 21.799 sores, The prgposed
10=410p would pers►it 'p##lce' use, do 10.498 Acres retail use on 0.6`
acres end 260 multi-fsaily units on 17.1 aoros. iL-165.5
'f!t! AsyQt;IoOoo d this pubito h,oartiap
r~ 9it .
Go`or' i kinr,' the 'pqktit~one sppk,i, in favor atating thst he was
rlpr*4412n~ o., w, M4rtto~, `Mf. 96ft1ns .preeent44 a map of the area
s and thi"jilt * of ;tho/'Proppaass,,t,hsn4os to the planned davetop-
*#nt; TO, Propooed p1an,''abendo J.u0#ge of the Area near the me tt
p+top sty ,and would. oot' uss Wis►bCston for aoeoos to the retail
port~oA r f the dsWlbpstenty Thsro :wed not a ffiesat deal of 048a
change A ',bh! p~ ahem, 'IS4 KOh avid zo,iing Cos►ri4oion toad
xoq~feotdd+tl►aE , t i ,foal ,tool be rei o . Mr r Martin wa'e Aakin for
Uppt'nval' to hM"ve '5465 e' 44 for, general retail which' Mr. H.pg¢kina
bl►,; l4r, Nartdn was also requastin t h e d e I' ti o
fe t was,foao of
the,100.appat rest~iIt nt ,sd¢' to'reduce the multi-"Easily unity rum
.x.70 to 26A units, tt►e eroa,.to, the sast was the new country club
develop" ,nt, <Mt, 41dOia'propoiood to dedtcsta an addttional 30 feet
of right.of•xay to 'xlloviats any 'future problems on State School
Road 1
Council Modsber ltiddl'esperger adked We, Hopkins if he had, been
advised of the possible extonsion'of the south loop in this area,
Mr. Hopkins, responded that it wag ' his und*rstanding that the
pro sod ext$nsion would be adjacent to the property west of the
hi gltw,tiy .
No one spoke iN oppoeiti'dn.
rho Nayor closed the „public hearing',
kl
Denise Spivey, eve 01 nt kevisw Plonnet, reported that 14 reply
form.i had been ILlied with, t eeturnad in favor and 1 returned in
depposition. ''flits x4s an kxilgidg d1xplied developpment whigt was
tisid' r'enoA, used. c~,e d i►eldps"rs had reworked tno "plan and had
dubsi ~ilted spt~ific to piLn>< ap¢ .;yrlo;.. .'rho ,ofjico ortion of the
brigs Al pl+)1Rnrd dirvis nt, d ,pgen' axpiinded with the addition of
a fetMil 'Ar4,4. 'i'f#e nt t',o YU#ti->rYlwily,. unitst~A~d bean reduced
'And 6he fuel stop and testmAtaot lied bean deietad. Several
I c, conditions hod been attlschod by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Cou'voil'Meslber Hopkinss asked what was the normal amount of right-of-
way on'l.oap 288.
i
Ll &1a
, J~'v t I '1t 5~M , w1STm'r_~ r ~ ~~"1 1 rr Y J,ir~~idr ww¶' `.I~fP+1 lr pJ J 7 ~i71• T~ )n
e , 4 'T fit} r r
Jlyi, "iTm w '`i~ if ,4,•, :,?-v h'; rl ,i .1'
7
>ha~e 416
ik t,
' tlesi.~'tArlt Q ll'Y KAI! fit' ,d a ~ 110 I~erponded tCj~1C "~t.~1e aOWunC vepi W
frog 90' tq. X40 x'00 rpr Ohara ;tt was baortawd On r.he 1a%
xa thia+a>< akrl I rpNpnakhe kequrehsht woNldbe.'Xor
99,,14ot vets ' an e14 100, r rya', Yf the "oont propaated to 1+0
ded~$a ed` by Mr, o ktin 40i aot tuffiatent, the 0►dditianal portion
o0u o obCMined troy that, ~.bher de. '
C,punotl M4aat++ir liapkina Mi~kad' tf tho. alignsPnt was correct so that
a'dditionaxl.right•cf-way would rot need to be noquirad in the future,
0au►ioii" K40tior 9iddl6sp*p4Qr otatod that this entire Counoil woo
,ntorcaC~ld in this r,"Iioi*v*y issue and asked tf the property
ownersthe on the other 4,401 would dedicate 30 foot ao as to .lino up
with loop,extonsion.
Mayor Stewart asked stab, if it was bolisvsd that adequate right-of-
way hod been obtained, '
Spivey responded atating.according to inforret3on fro>r the Traffic
6niineer, the additional 30 feot mould be adequate,
to The Qoun4il 4onstderad 042tion of an ordinance
spppro'W$ s'planne1 devol~opaant At the southea k corner of the 1+35~
&Mioe ro±sd: and State, school Road to pokrsit 'office use on 10,698
44"Wt rotoi,l' pso on 9.6 &area Aatd 260 >Ilulti~f*ulily ',Units nn 17.1
aatoo
The lolloOlt. yordiOWW6 war pr*$Ant's 141%
NO, ,84'*d9
( D1` I~WC9 XNEIZI q 'fN~ f0 N> Nq MO 0f,' ,THE CITY of
r OAS' A P 8~ A~ `AN APPI04DIX TO Ttik' COhg o>}
` p '66Nt'OiN, x , BY '%D1NAN$ir No.
,,1, ''A5: D/~1~GYlES PTO ~,pPliQ IMaI'C~Y g6.2 ORES
xll 16.E t, 4 , E?', lZ , ft ► Sl R1 y 0 Ap5`t`lIAC NO
0$01 D N CDll~'►`Y,. 1xA~' AND Mbk2 pA[~TICULAl1LY 156SC91SED
IiE!lkXN;' p DCcLA`i IW AN C yECTIVE PATH.
.f
t, poops, tho otAij'ffllnceti, on :roll call
Cnow tlof,ibn► Ahford 66CO~yd`" tf
veto McAUos a~ ee,;" Hopkins 'ad~e,stsphoos, ay, Alford oe,
8,iddiat'rpersar aya Cheer aYe,, and: Mayor Stawstit 'aaye:" Motion
carried 6'to i with Council Meshar Strpl}rna casting the nsy vote.
C, The douncil held it pu61ic he,0ring on the petition of
DsWid Lai *bar requerting> s nhango in zonin#' i'roafl the agricultural
(A) classification to the pieinna¢ doveiojsment (?D) classification Vn
a 2'1 :ore tract in the Robert 8eaumonr:Survay, Abstract 31, located
on the vast aide of Hinkle Dfive approgimatyly 200 feet north of
Naggaard loons. );f 'apptiovm.d, the planned develb merit would -parsit 16
11
ring,la f"Ll'dotso►►~ d j{ rdso 4it baa ate thin site (typical lot size '
x 92 fink).
would''be 41 10 W
a hearing.
'The Mayor'apanod the publi
mi Aavid 11440b*rr 6t6 petitioner, spoke in favor stating that he
loo, ved tho`. Cvo, su~oC irsu~s',►}03ka}, angineoriIt anti neethettcs'. This
daw,lop>Itagt,' sfould porot no ld,i0tina + or traffic problims and ' would
usChi'ttc 11y"'e~~ttad4a',,tho`,~t hborhood. 'rho houses would..obs priced
in ,silo" 9u OQo • tun e., r,; The policy ;fin tha Denton
Davl'oparoell r rJrfida•' "rO►ecSMflndiid vorrity of tiausing and this
devalbp"tit would'rOet thdt requiraseht'And not conpeosiro tits area.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed thol public hearing.
s
, J
Ali
'Zftf
/ i~ i( '1 1, 1 V
I !I , IAA ,I .
~tTl
Cs►~,ttw~ 10 1414
Beale! 14*}'akM'vi~w 4lsnrar, f~pgrkad Rhalt 7 ra~ply
tonoB 1NM M11) Kith Qi' to r ibtnl6 nglR~taNilyt dekraoThhd
opta. 'fib, pap#blgn wail :p
~iae4en bolas 1rhiAhaere not o0nsidered ss high' density housing,
?,an4# and zooms to"Ussion had recommended approval' with 5
aooditt do.
Council Heober Hopkins asked what would be tho density per actof
spiwy responded 7030.
1. The Couhnll considered adoption of an Ordinaulce
ap'provind. * ohenge in soAAting from x116 agricultural (s)
o aseifioabian tot planned development (PD classification on. a
2,1. acre : traot 1"atcd on the Wert ride of , Hinkle Drive
approximately 200, ;feet north of Haggard Lane to permit 16 single
family detached garden hoses on'the rite,
The following{ ordinance was prr.ssnted:
NO. 84-84
AM,Oot Awx A""1W TOO 40HING MAID Ur THE 'CITY Of ~DlaiTWO
C>i7tAS Y . WAS PTeh Art IX 'r0 O T"E coolt ' por
~'1?4 ACMES
~ArlLx~~''CO.iAtYSA
IW~3~I
i
t"s; Ig P S ICl14AS1„Y 4"O t1.S" tCTN N"""1 rn aB~IAltI1l0 S DATB,
Hq~kin~ a~ot on, Mt+s~{e second o s jpp~ the ordiponot, Lin `roll call
{ 144 a it ay, `4tins aYe, taphene aye, Alford uay~,"
Niddl'esYgdt~rrChow "ayeand Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
barC ied unarri>AOU4
p.; Tl+i'- Qaunail' hold ` a public ioirin on the pek~itioa `of
Mr. J. I'.' McClollan roi~µseting a change in coning t'roe she
a riou tuel (A) :clarsitioittoo to the planned devalopmont (PD)
a as'oi it"' I" at tM dorthwoot corner of Cottonwoad,,LAAs and U.-S,
Hplway 3a she, ;a arox is core particulally dASorib6d a4 lot 37
of the -OOgton 191II& r Mobile' Hose Addition. If 'apptoved, t'ne
pl'Anoed ddvplopaeat would permit the construction of'sini'-wsrehousaaa
6n'this rite. x~167
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr, J. CMcClallxn, thtl petitionor, spoke in favor '~tsttag that
this site was located 2 02 miles west of 1-95 on Highway"330.' The
only feasible tiss'for the. property'was mini-warehouses. No water or
'40. r saltvloe was available. Mr, McClellan stated that he owned the
adJacent property.
Nb one spoke in oppositions
'1he'Maydr cloaad the public heartng._
aenisi Spivey, Development kaview Planner, -i6portod that 14 reply
fo ! h#d bben mailed with 1 returned in f vas and i. returned: 'in
oaf asi~.tots.. The r- 4"st , was for planned ~evelopmoot sontr4 for
04W4 tiai use. ~t~ egoranoe, to the proplt'ty would be from
oodoo640od'; not ~EMij'jIlay`.380, ` Phis 06ject wo{1 ''~provid~ atoriige
as to,, the %obile' home 'p rk resid nts. The P Affinin add Zen'i
uorgs~rrion had recormendet approval of the petit oil' with
conditions.
1, ` The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
, ;from the ' e riouttural (~i)
r qvi ¢i aha a iq ~epning
~ tt JAl Mt`t !t q PlM de 14*0 t ' (PD) q~aesif;eatipd r to i ;
pale it',the epaAtiliotibn' o>~i ii A 1lar06but* r at the:northw6st 'coshes
of ,ottoelwed Lade and` U. S. Highway 3J10.
iP'i.
f,
itl,l slw.5j l1r,y`!n PmkR'es~Y`~7?4N~,~
77
! `r r r
qp~yy
CWtI►bA ' tg ~ 1
N
Nf,MM,~I,Mt~M,11r ' 1T ~ l~'
The "following ardi.aaaoe'k'aa Ort+aat*da
Ate WINANCR ANT) tMi ;THE ,I ING HAr Of THIS CITY OF ag"X,
't&W1 AA $ANR k AtSOtTIW'"AS AN APtt"'X To TMZ 00(1 of
oMt1DIM~liClla3 of !SR ;_1` 411i b~Nlol1, T'UA$$ lx ONGINANC~':''"
691.1 AND Al S~XD A+►t' r,lTLit $ To LOT,ir OF DENTON RS A a
NoAILS Ron ADD`till ON CITY or DENTON, TEXAS' AN~ **t
AO ICULMLY DiSCRIItE HCRRI~i{ AND U6CLARLNG A,ll iSF L~t`TIVF
McAdoo# Motion, Riddles~erAsr, second to adopt the ordinahoe, On
roll all vote, NOA4" 'ayl+, I Hopgns '1gya}" Stephens "aye, 'i~AlfaSd
yet' Riddlosperpt eye, Chew aye, and Mayor Stewart aye.
Motion curried unapiocusly.
The Mayor moved A$*nda'itoo 9 forward.
91 Resolutions
At " Tl Council consider ad approval of a resolution
authorisia publication of notice of intention to'Lsaua Certificates
of 04li at en of the City of Linton, Texas, 'for solid waati, disposal
lobilit~es~
Ara:#atant C~ty,'M~Ay+r hick Swhla rtpoetad "that the Certificates of
Oblir•tion'~1t+uld'be in the amaunt of $1,600,000 for the Gons'truetlon
of 't haw londfil14
Tns following resolution was proseittedt
Rlt$QI~UTIQN
ANl`Ilalt x NG IOU i.ICATION' o Nd?ICE of I'll ION TO ISSUE
CLRTIF1CAtE8 0 'OBLIGATION of. ''fut CITY'OI ,PnW, T&W
06k SOLID WASTE'OI$ i6FAL >:ACIWTIES
149 $TAT$ Or WUS
COUNTY 0
'CLTY O1~ OtN
Yis6*W it is d"oed necessary alepd~ advisable that Notice
of lgtsntion" to Issue Certificates of ligation be given as
hereinafter, provided;
TAgREPOREy BE IT RESOLVED dY THE CITY COUNCIL 'OF THE CITY
OF DENTON:
Section Is That Attached horato is a fora of "NOTICE OF
IN'tLNTION"TO"ISSU1 CERTIVICATE$ OF 0 L1GA'rLON OF m Cury' OF DE.NTON,
TMk$* Fib SOLID VA$Ttt pISFQS/►L FAC14ITIES" the 'form and substance
of'Ghidti apt ,harr<by adoptt+d and approved.
Sect on 24 That the City' Sacratrry'"shall osuse said
NOTICE, iq it 140tially the form, attached hereto, to be publiaihed
onoli',a weak at two,,aonsecutive weeks in a n4Mippspar of general
circulitton in. It City, ttie date "of 'the first publication to be at
least fourteen`(} dais prior to tho date tentatively sot for the
p±tIPA g '.,of O Ordlnonce authorising 'the issuance of such
rt f ratsa Of 'Obligation.
CheltYor~dn, Alford second that the resnlution'b spprbvpd. On roll'
call, vote' NcAdsalr "eye," Hopkins I afire," Ste hens "ayeAlfurd
"ayeRtadYesprYgar. "aye,",Chew 'aye,' and Mayor Stewart "aye,"
Notion carried unanir,ously.
I
i
. y
I
i
T, MWF97 7471
Tlta Mgy'OR them '0eetieabd r1iSuise' saonda order.
S. Ordiaanc~~"
A, The, 13011,1494l eeaitderod oftItttoo of an ordinancs
to !tt's~'1t 41014 t t 0 And lac*'aot d pu 1 o hoariid rosatdin t
Mkiba l~z~, 11; d. Mu~to for ~InneltaCton of prtaxihattty 11
aoreA of land tooitod at' the Mtirreotioo of 1'-35t Mayhill Road
and repealing ordinance 84.76 relating the Tara, AA-6
Sher qp„ J.A+4mon, PlMnniAg Technician, reportad that duo to a
ria u lieation ik the ' nowep'aPerIt it would be n*c*smory to
root, rtise. The' public laarina would be'hel¢ on July 24th and
annsxeeton prooosdings Mould be instituted on August 13,
The tollowinS ordinance was presented:
$0. a4«p6
AN 00AYIUMC6 SETTING A OATS TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED
NiltAljOM Ot JkTAW 09498TY BY THE CITY or DKITON
3' XAi ANI)`~ No rNO DIRICTINC THE MAYOR TO T1111LISA
NOi,'IC~ OT S YC MPlARINO,
I kiss rotion, t'Chow aeokinvito'aodoptStophenainance. Atoroll,accall
vo I! Riddle at $yy~o~ CMM Ayo. and Mayor Stewart aye. Motion
aKrr aiiMwf#ly,
a. The dp~tgoil. considered adoption of an ordi
4004 cr
approyin~.the pet of Jarea R. Ntblott requesting a Ghanao' in
aqn !'tw aStiouttural (A) to the light industrial (LI)
olAi fioatian on A ?i~.06 to :tract located adjacent and north of
N hNA itl01i' . adjArtent aqd south of the TV and MICE 'kailroad,
ba tna na,Appxalcia~atlly 700 foot oast of Mayhill Road, 2-1661
The'follofd.ng ordinance was presented:
NO. 84.67
Ail OfIDYNANC6 Al1tND1Nq tME 'xt)NINb MAP of r~ t c1TY O! D%rtTOM,
eAM14 VAS APTtD AS AN APPENDIX TO 1►tE CODE` OF
0p~~Wp O1 THIS CI Of DEtITbNi Tf,XAS, gY 011DIMrWCE NO.
541, AND AS ~Ih MAP .:APPLIES TO APPROxtMA~'F.LEY 4~.OG ACitBS
Ole LAND QUT (IE TiiE N. FOkRtST SUttVEX, ABS CT N0. 147
DEtt'I'ON COUNTY ~ AND MORE p/~TICIJLA[il.Y DESCTIIBE~
HERLYN~ AND DEGLAR~AN EfFECT2VE DATE.
Steghans motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
1 01 I It It
1i Hopkins !1Ye, Stephens aye, A1Eogd a e,
ote - MpAdara ~0 a 0
Ridd~eapal'kar, ay+►, Chew aye, and Mayor Stewart aye, No ion
carried unaniywuoly.
C. The, Council Considered adoption of PA, ordinance
approyina the petition of JA" 1t. Neblett requestf.nq a chanSt in
Boni frost aaridultur i (A to the. it ht inauatrial (LI)
cieraffiaation od is 16.99 sore tract be inning at the northwest
corner of Highway 90oR and Goealiq Road. -1662
The following ordinance yea present" I
M0 94-,A8
AN'OOU WCE,AX90DING'THE YJ)N1Na MAP Of THE CITY;OF DENYON,
TEXAS AS SAM&' VAS ADOPTED, AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODS.; OF
OkDINA1/09S OB' TO CITY OF WITON, Te,.W BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1 OAtND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 4PROXIII ILLY 16.90~p91
41 kD>gi"t"►~'riwI ~ilNO~rPAft~I~YCt11~ARLY DPtaCkTND
iWINt AND DlrC 610 AM ACTIVE DI
.i,
i,iii `
z aK • ~i .4 , rt i1. ,4: 1 .1. G i ~~~N~w -13°'°"t?+'~' ey .y,~y.}x r~ ,3+ Yx~~
St♦ E, q ObeM o~nd to addtt, the ordtniiiioe4 On roll 0a11
Vop toZip "jje,' Stephens "Aye it Alford 'A •,~i
Rid~`oel►e1rr ohi, Chev stye And mayor Stewart aye. Motion
nArr! d ut,iaaipawly.
D, The'- Council oonridored adoption of an ordinance
abaoldoni,n8 n; utility aseareat on Santa Monica to Clovis C. and
Marilyn E. Morrirsoo.
Sob Helgon, 0trector of Utilities, reported that this was a routing
abandonaaat o an easeoent. The easevant was not used or needed,
The following ordinance was praaonted:
d0, 8489
AN OROINAIiCE ..pAOVIDINO FOR THE AAA11pONtiRNT Olt A UTILITY
EAStNENT YITHYN THE CITY, OF DENTON, AND -AUTHORIZING THE
MAY014 TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT
TITU9 ANA INTEREST of THE CITY IN SAID EASEM TO THL1
Or ru TRACT; or ~ CONVEYED BY SAID EASIMM I AND
G9CUAING AN 9MCTIYE OATEN
Ho king motioa, Riddleaperger second to adopt the ordinance, on
Coll 9a mute', NcAdar 'AY Ib as " ye," p Alford
a, , ~~OdiedperNr aro,'r Chow p Are,'r and MayorenStewart "Sys."
Nottod oarriod',w►axi*our y.
!d. rm Council considered adoption of an ordinance
abandoning a utility asrswnt on Santa Monica to Carl L. Coil, Jr.,
and Bonnie Coil.
Bob Nalson$ D~ector of Utilities, rsported that this war a routine
a6an4on tkt o 5 feet of aies►int on' one property and 5' feet on
another, The iaaertsrte',was not used or needed.
the fallowing ordinance was presented:`
NO. 84.90
AN ' ORDINAKI X PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT of +A UTILITY
EASYOM$T WXTH j,N THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO 'C0 UTE A QU TCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT,
TITLE AND IN'POUT OF 'CITY IN SAID EASEMENT 'TO THE
OWNER OF THE TRACT Of LAND CONVEYED BY SAID EASEMENT, AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DA'Z'E.
McAdams motion, Alford'saoond to adopt the ordinance. _ On roll call
vote, McAdams 'lay* to 'Hooking Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
aiddiesperger Iaye, Chow eya, and Mayor Stewart aye. Motion
carriad unanimously.
. The Council consider d' adoption of an droinanoe
abandoning r utility easemsnt on"Lynhurst to'Charlas' L. and Eleanor
RoedsMA.
Bob Nilson, Director of Utilities, reported that also was a routine
abandonaant. The easement was not needed.
Thu: following ordinance vats presented!
N0. "-91
0 ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ASA"'ONMENT OF A UTILITY
EASEMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF DOTpN AND AUTHORIZING THE
MYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT
TITLE AND IATEREST OF THE CITY IN SAID EASIXIMT TO T1i~E
OWM 0!' 'CMG"( OF. L 'CONVEYED $Y SAID E48E1ENT; ANa
DtdLARIWG AN tFFECTIVr "tat.
t. «r' cif ' {0777,,
' oiRr' 41
lot
` o! t► 1<7, 1tM
Fir
f;
NeAd ttiAt mat tow ire t as 1t`. tbs, okdi0#A0 a tall 'cots
vats N N • ye r ff $6,6-phone "aye ► ► Al ford "ily!
"aye." Motion
Ma
Ridd;4ep•+fMt Chew flsyo►!~ and >ar Stewart
4errled uaa-4 as y
9. Resolutions I
Agenda items 9.A and 9.J had been Moved' up in the agenda 'order and had
bean acted on by the Couno`il,
C. The Council considered approval of a resolution accepting
tits: todsral Easrg uletory °Commission's order issuing Denton a
license for the L*wtsvilta Aydroeleotrio tvojsot.
Bob Helson► Director of Utilities, reported that the city had received a
liesp • !or thr~ Lewisville Nydroel•otric Projtct ;n order to validate
council must approve Chs reso ut;on,
the mense► 0-a
The following resolution was presentedt
R E $ 0 L U T I D N
rgl0440 the City of Denton, taxer has filed an application
with the United States of America, fode#at Snarly Regulatory Commission,
for a license under 'tart I of the fr4deral Power Act to construct,
operate& and maintain the Lewisville Projrot No, 3940-001; and,
'eke .Feasibility •t'' 1!Y' for the eoostruo*inn of the
Le"Ovillm roeleotrio Projeaa ham i! completed and, presumed to the
Denton City .uncilf and,
44MA36 the City of Denton has received an Order 'fssui
License (Major) (Issued Naroh 27, 1964) from the united States of
ip Federal goergy Regulatory Commission for Laid Project No.
394and,
wgbRLU , tW `City Council of the City of Denton, Texas
recognises the feasibility of the Lewisville Project 3040.001, now,
therefore,
BE IT HOMY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEAS
THAT:
SECTION_I~
The Director of Utilities of the City of 'be iton, Texas, be and
is hereby authorized to accept the terms and conditions of the subject
order betwean the United States of America, Federal Energy Regulatory
Co■missioe, And the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
This Resolution *hall be in effect immediately upon its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 11th'day of July, 19PA.
Klmlim a. ' Mar_
CITY O! Deftw, TzJW
ATUST:
C IoI' L'Y''fr'SWKVM
CITY Oi OUTO140 TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORT!t
CiTJ.O! g&jk LCITY ATTOAMEY 0 +11z
BY,
{
. i, g+°x1S°?~.m:~7+~i:wq,a .q.'~r''sj'a✓~t' zinc n f Cana a^ 7_'Si`tF".Rr:+*2p.F ~St 4,~' -r.:id i, ,Fi 4'"," 'V~;
77
1 '
Q~ Cearg0~.1 Niuee
MM ,y# sRiti~w ly 17 19N►
top,
Allotrd Itettoo Rtddlespo"" seeomd that. tba resolution be
ro►wq, . 4ri "I1 l' a 11 yvqok~l ► NoA~+►~a ~ 1~ ~!'R~t 1161 11 $topfioas
aye, Alipttd Ye. Htfddlespssev a~r•► CMw aye, and Mayor
imout~ly.
Stewart "aYil." !lotion oarrirad upon
W Th. Council coaaidoral approval to provide sanitary sewer
Nsi~rvf;eecity for Ht. Oo McDonnell on as o Gore tract located outside the
Dentoq lisita.
lob' 141soct piriott►r of Utilities, reported that the property was
locab;dd on Htast "4q4" ay Street and was Sting dwalopsd by Mr.
* Odnnell as a teai4ence. Mr. McDo6001 war requesting the sewer
service and would perform the installation.
Mayor Stewart asked'how this would affect the city rate. The Public
Utilitie Commiss n has placed restrictions on service in the extra
territor al juris Mica.
Council Member Hopkins asked if Mr. McDonnell would pay 1 112 times
the rate to Denton residents.
tt4lson responded yea.
MoAdaw actions Hopkins second to approve the sanitary sever service
for Mr. Nob6naaim. tion carried unanimously.
11: 4 The Council was to -consider A; V'O aI of •bl►aeon Nsau;
portion of ea exiating16 inch wNterline ad~aoent to she Dave se
autoswMle ;dealership on Weet University oulavard between Cornell
Street and Malone Street.
This item was remoteod frost the a4aada by staff.
12. The Council oonsidoxod approval of downtown square
undorsrouod podmount switch and transformer apace.
sob Nelson, Director of Utilities, repotted that Gilbert and
Aasooiates had oomplated a study on possible locations for s,Akohes
and other aquips/ot to allow for underground utilities on the
square An uoOor round vault had been considered but was too
expensive. In order to install thine switches, certain parking
spaces would have to be designated as locations for the
tranaforears. I~►a locations war* selected to avoid reAr building
entrances or to ing areas as much as possible.
McAdasas motion, Kiddiespar ar second to approve the downtown square
underground padmount switch and transformer space. Motion carried
unanimously.
13. The Council considered appointment of Deputy City
Secretaries.
City Manager Chris Hartung repo tad chat► as a result' of staff
chasas in the City Manager's, Office, he was recommending that
Laurie Jackson and Vic gayer be appointed as Deputy City Secretaries.
Hopkins roticn,' Stephens second to appoint Laurie "Jackson and Vic
toyer as Deputy City Secretaries. lotion carried unanimously.
14 Thera was no official Action on ru4cutive Session items of ,
legal matters, real eatate, personnel, and board appointsents.
15. The lollowing items of new businosc ware suggeated for
future agendas
i., Council Member Stephens asked for, a ties line and 'plan to
establish loop 266 south
7777777
city coom" Mime441
r~~t~otw ly 1f ~ 1"4 1
2. Mdyor tro Too Chow oslad that •q its, be 016014'00 the
agenda to 4111ew the t:eunol l to 11 rior on the retstburaesont of.
costs for hook and ladder truck 4
S. Council Nmohly %opkins asked for an update on street
repairs as soon an podsible,
The council theq,4d,~ovrao4 into the ~ateoutiw Session to ditouas
lesal natters, real eatake ti personnel, and board appointooko
The followia oi"fiolal lotion was t"Ant
Hopkins slotion, Chew second to appoint Jos Norris as Actint City
Attorney until a City Attorney could be reoruitsd, Notion oarried
unanieously.
Hopklna siotigns Chew second to extend 'the tern of Rod Hutton on the
L,throry Board for aqe year to a it in 1966 and to have the Data
pYOadsains Advisory Board draw lets or lan8th of torts in order to
haute staNered expiration data*. Notion carried unanis►ously.
With no further busioesso the "*tin$ Vas adjourned.
♦ O
el" IKMMM
q ALLEN,
C
4~, 1616C ~
' T'
{!(7 77r,`7 1} i {l1 * N; Y l tr,sfi77 Y 1
CITY Cq *11 AW'DA
BACK-UP %$WAY SW ET
t,
DATE OF MEETING: October 2, 1984
r,
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N: Content
SUBJECT: BID N9342 STREET AND WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS
AT NEW LANDFILL
SUMMARY: This bid was sent to over 24`vendOrs and'suppliersr
The projects were listed separately;'bn the proposal.
i. Bids were received on either one or'both items,
We received two bids op;the Road (Street) Project
` and five on th'b Waterline Project as shown on
the Uoulation Sheet
s
ACTIOW AWIO'M Apprdval by Council a'nd AWard'of Bid
SOURCE''OF FUNDS: Landfill Project Fund
` RECOMNENDAT104: We req'*m04, this bid be a"Hed,to the low b144*r
for each r0 ect, Item i - Prof@ct-q r Rood,
to Jaggoe ub is Co. at $1520779. and Project e
Waterline, to Dickerson Construction Co. at
$65, 873.50,
EXHIBIT: Tab lation :5h'..Set
SUBMITTED BY:
/0. hn~ Jt,t shall, C.P.M.
(/purchasing Agent
BID TITLE $REST dt,.WATERLI E
INC. IPWROVEMENTS
' oYEVED,Sep ~ r in9a ;:M JJAIOE R88,
, CAhYER? ; JAY ~iAb ~ DXCkER50N
LIC PAVING (1O, CORPORATION COW,
ACCOUNT it
t,. QTY, Y 0 V 1 R 1fENDyOfi VOR V DOk N R It VR
1 Pro Gt A pd
197 01411 An
2 PrOject B - Wa erli a X2,557,5 127j881.86'1104,146.00 72.1 00 65.873, 50
_ Did Bond Gjgsed.' _ I Yoe, Yes Y Yes
y
4 i
,rc. 1~ I S~( r~ r iF l' , i iy 4VII DVS Iti'1
~7 Ilfi i i.; ~r ~s
071
,
~Yi<'Y CQUNC14 A6ENp11
BACK41P SIMBM V Si1KE,Y
DATE OF.MEETING: October 2, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITMC N: Consent
t119JECT: BID #9346 MOBILE RADIOS
SUMMARY: This`bid is for four 2-"channels mobile radios,
one for the Matte Water`Treatioent Departeient and
three for the Street Departmt,
ACTION' ~;Ei~iIRED; Appri-' *I' b Counci 1 and Award ')f Bid
SOURC.E OP `FUAOS; N620=0058»0;4 0-01S'6 ''Budget 'ACe661uAt Ora
00240304110 ~sudget Account
01fl0
RECOMMENOATION: Me recoiim*nd thiW' b d be a'warded' to 46tor01a,
the ;low`°AYailuate~ p 'dder nie409' the's ecifications
t,;1,4~8 00 each~Per 4 radios, a total of
I5,832.QO; The low bids were subioit'te'd hy Hdkeil
ln' 'trun>d'nts for the pace radio* at $01"i"`OQ~ ahd
$962.00 each. Those low bids: were eval4lated' btiy
Mr, John Maxwel,; He re'c6M"od,ed the 1o;gest and
best evaluated' Odder for the 'City of Denton,
EXHIBITS: Tabulation' Sheet
Memo from/JA n Maxwell
rSUBMITTED BY:
J\ M sha 1, C:p,M.
o hasi{htig Agent,
4 IT Iti « 'y„
5 Y~u • r ~~u-rrw ~ .i ~ BID TITLE WHILE RADIOS
Op1rNBb SeDtembiah 20. G E. RMLL VOTORDLA HOELL
$4 2 1) m CO~MI. COHN
ACCOUNT 1 Y0031M-I 0
n BH''. 8 _ VtA.oR VB V V`~1iXfR
IT= or
i 4 ftbils Raidio$ 16 x523,00 962.00 i 4040 837,
,r #
.W
r Delivery 90 Days 30 Days da s ZO DAXS i
Incl. Enst 1tncl Inst.
NFfg G.E. f Pace Motorola iPace _
LMIII 1895 LMIII 1895_____
I
I
j
i
is
I I' I 1 411 u Y I I ',r I .r
I Y1 ~ , ,
.I
I
i
Y,
' $ Tax f>M/fllCtpAf. M/ff.WVf / fl kfgfa, rf?XrcS Iii 0~ / Tlft,Ef E (df 7) She OQ
MEMURANUtlfl'
TUi Tom; Shaw, Purchasing Agent
FNUM: John G Maxwell, hmeryency Management Coordinator
uAft: September 25, 1984
RE$ Paluatidn On r,adi`o bid froo "t Nowell C:oaaKUniaation
(PACE) and 40torola
1 find that both Motorola and GB have suet the specifications as
published.
Hbwe"i1 CCinutl'finiaatii~n b'id'i"h'g `the,aC?!s radio `Yai1e to meet the
specifications in the following areas:'
Tranamitter e~ c's Howell Comm (PACE)
Spuxious & harmonic
emiesion, ~5dC3 7Udki
FM noise 70d8 4UUB
.deceiver
Selectivity' NIA 2 Signal 'i;00d8
~5c1k3
Spurious & i{daye rejection 100' dki 8bdB
Audio 'bistoration less than 34 , . 10%
Audio Output 12 Watts 'min 5 Watts
i see no noise blanker/extender on the PAC~;speciiication.
i recommend Motorola as the low compliance bidder,
n G. Maxwell
Nmeryency Management Coordinator
#0413C
3 i4 7 7SSN aM1 pf} "'y°1 ARP '1~r'~'~' Y ` , TIT, G+ i 3F r y5 r', rF +p, it e 1 I 1 r } a , 1 +
rr I ti~ fr + ~ 1 r~ i I 1V +
i
i
C11* COfNICIL A4EliM
MCK-UP 9000 SHUT
DATE OF MEETING: October 2, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM +t:
SUBJECT: Purchase Order 064764 P.A. ROSS MACHINERY
SUMMARY: This''pGrdhase tlrder► in the, aieaunt of. #3,66,1.73,
is for tha'`O ql' to oY rliaul tlf; the`'~ear a»'i 0
nule~! 2`► mobile ~iSr~
Th4 ar r `COW 4 par,`ts► labor, a d freijht .
to'cbiaplete'thi4 engine overhaul.
ACTI* REQUIRtDc Approval by Council
SOURCE' OF FUNDS; ACG'ornt Nuref" 768-004.0598-8710
Vehicle Maiintenance Sublet Repairs
RECOMMENDATION', We t"6coownd this purchase nrder'nom1her 64764
to P.A. Ross Machinery be apprOv#d in the 'amount,
of 0,551.73. The original estimate was #3,800,10.
EXHIBITS: Purchase Order Copy
I\aVoi`
SUBMITTED BY: \
Torn D ,'Show, C.P,M,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
r;.~ r rHFy~~ Ar'~'4 t r ~R ' ` fr`1a.71
l~. 0..N1Nt g11T111lYlENil1'hW.
647!'64 000,004 C14
RR541)040 'i~~ABi !{ACH;NRpY .V~Ni1i~,~MA,t1NTt=NANCE
1s,ror - CC1Nt*XttNAT>s4N ciNLr .
E4it4' Sob C°0NTRAL, V!XPRE68WAY 00 NOT'buiL.1CATE
DAW AS9•' TX• 76215
ITEM ACOOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTON BID NO. LINE AMOUP
01 Y10 004 0598 14AW 1 2890 REAR ENGINE COMPLETE 5•~In0.0o
into
TOTAL FOR Pn0• l fA800.00
The City of Denton„ Texas Is tax exempt House Bill No. 20.
ft*o toe P.O. Number on all W Shipments and Invoices. C ,
Shipments are F.O'.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
SoW M ioioe* TO: Db*M AN 44UM" YID:
C4 ~fq~rton, A4aoous PaY!W+! Jdn+ ,l. M+irNop C.p.M. hurahuMofi,t
216 Clsnt2k+, TX rd201 Ydtn `Sf+~w 'O,i~,M: Atwt. l uroho*v A~wvt
> Mtzlttrirtrl~ 1.,
'Phorn A1'~16dbd223 ' 81~'!'f~d~831f O1FVV Mbtro 26T~0/2
The CltyQf_Denton is sin equal opportunity employer
t an
r' n, t♦ 'r w. f 3' Q S e c t ~ k r k: V ^ t i '
1. Y, A E G. a . rl,. I
~ rr
CITY COW IL AQEllgl
BLACK-UP 0A WY SWET
' DATE OF. MEETING: October 2► 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM M: Consent
SUBJECT: Purchase Order #64930 BOLAIN EQUIPMENT, INC.
SUMMARY: Thi s, purchase order i s fo the everg~„„{tcy rep& r
of our eguipa nt nuaiber'2040,'a 1479 1K Cab over,
as indicated on,"the 'attached repair order,
ACTION REQU I CO Approval by Cotf11C i 1
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 9udggAtad Repair & Maintahanca
' I"630~002-008-8342
WOWNDAYION: We Yecommet,d -this ew6,,cy purchaso order. for
Vehicle repai"rs be olp., ad fo`rJa nt' i<o 8olain
Equi`prnent,Inc., in irhe ahwunt' 3487.04 as
shown on the purchase order and repair order-invoice.
EXH16ITS: Purchase Order Copy
Repair Order.
SUBMITTED 8Y: '2 .
d'n ~~~'ta shall, C.P.M.
16~1 urchasing Agent
x.
.s
r
Y.
,
i ,
r 1 } 'hCRl +Q2 9,
i
r
~ i ,c, eu 1 t ,rr''S7 1 ! i I ,({rP
~
;97
r, a CA
aar'i poCUMENT me
'1111MAlN 6w1o.NT. INC.
at 0,ox, 410
oalkfON• TX 16201
1.
' ITEM AMOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DEWRIP'TION BID NO. UNE AMOUN',
`01 Y10 004 059U 8710 1 2u40 iWpAiA,olFF9AENTlAL ~~iti7.d♦
t!
S' 1
I
i
i
TOTAL FUi P.V. 311!7+04
rw,Clty of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No, 20.
r ,
' fielelwmlr PA klum On all Bll., Shipments and Invotcee.
&*~te we F.O.B. City Of Denton, of ae Indicated.
Wnd. (nvoloes t : 0100011 AM N"Pk* to-
Pwj" ► J. mot, -0111, O.p:M. .
Cyy vi`f0nt* AoO OM
? 9fw,.i►.M. pur4hMN►p
ltN~,7e201 Tdiri.
2163 E" MOKMnr~ 40
- Pflbrte'bi7l6ed33 dt~IdUbillf DrFW Mitro 247-0042
vie City of Denton Is an wltw owrtunlly arnpioy+r
ca lN~NtwuKustnN~Atouwr
N4 ! 1060'
f~ ¢ , OISCAItitON ►RIC MAIN, R1'~ 1` o t 44 6 ON*^ 1%74*1
! ' MI. 074l,14iONlxTF10 4*10 ~ .
LW00I
ONLY IN DlWrI t7t)1lNTY o*ta TX
G `
aAt
If A"I
L No ;
40 221 . I LAII '
NS! K! #ITAIN ~ARfS IOR
II t ~ 1' MN~I'CrfON E
Y A IA
❑r
r ♦ I DWAFD PAM
(f CAtt LJ CHOII SAANt,❑ fDFf WAlM IOIItMn
Or A,No, IN TAUCTION AI
t
"ol 'J
! i
4001
1
I
TOTAL PARtS
t• i
< i.
' ; LUtltr Ak1A1Rt ; I rs
I war wMwu~ N »rw u M NN w r w M IM N1/««r Tr«,« r
~!1 A« M«A «N!« TdfA LA►OR
r M~y.N. Nlrll N ~M'IN tM 1«I NN1 M ~F . h
10 W4 I., III so
«N«. N.M«rw', I«
ot=
TOTAL PAM
` TOTAL SUNIiT RMAIR3 ~ur w.H «.1r.eli.«.rwprk0I ~
~»r/ AtC111bRIM
' IlBTIMAtt f1MgUlIr ~ S
MOk"PARr`C 00
1MOR' . - rI I Y
"Ls. OA!
i
p S rw. AwTt~
AI b114
10rK
lu e 7 .rr• .sv
J( i
t
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP WWRY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: October 2, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0: Consent
SUBJECT: Purchase Order 064985 CALVERT MOTOR CO.
SUMMARY This purchase order is for the``emergbncy replacement
of an engine in `our equipment number $221.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget Vehicle.Repair and Maintenance
0610-008-0262-8342
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this emergency repaii, purchase
order be approved for payment for the repplacement
of a motor i,n a 1982 IHC truck used by the'Electric
Distribution Department.
EXHIBITS: Purchase Order Copy
lllpa~r Order-Invoice
SUBMITTED BY:.
oKn J. `l! rshall, C.P.Mi.
Purchasing Agent
k Iph1 Mry,Nrq { iT>@1QpPd4t°~aT'n
215 L
P, 0,'NUMOA pA'►~SN I NO. DOCUNIIFNT
fiA 935 O'~I17/!!w'; GARAGE
CAL66500
YBtJgOR; SHIP T0;
CAI,Vt f7T 'MOTDft COMPANY
"*D1, flux 1005
OtNTON+ TX 76POl
fTlrfiA ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. WINg AMOUNT
01 110'004 oci9tl 1,1710 1 iP%,"1!1 WUPLACI ENOINt? '~•x1Y~77
i
TUTAL FOR ;J*0* 3 217.77
The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt House Bill No. 20. _
Refsoiopa P.O. Number on all, Bit, Shipments' and Invab.*s.
ShIpnwts are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicpted:
Se~W Irw*Wo TO: DM+rot AN Ya
City of I,tl r , 'A666' e- hyabb John J. 'Marsha o C,{
215 E MoKlnndy;3t.,'Denion, TX 18201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M,,Arat, i'urcMeltir~l.
Phone 81tf6 822:1 8itll"II DiFYV Mstro 2ilT40d~ ,
r w city of biotbn Is an equal oppoitunhy emp$oyer
i;
!M'7 kKtNil
_ IF790 ,.1
OATf
Iqt 09
It , MS~
`S+Sd`d'' hotirf /Y O S"S
*4$,W 460( opoe 1806WIM
00A ow
LotgAles Pow
° CaEVERT MOTOR COMPANY
r JA P.d, Sox 190 OENTON, TEXAS 76201 304 E. Sytorn"
i tr o" 387.9471 MNTo431.1251
All ACC6x1NTS PAYASIE AT DENTC*C WNTON COUNTY, TtXAS.
f,
40W.2ev /L.44
~ I
Bl"JW11 4001t r
C
' Nol RNpw+f of lo{S of D6"140 to CO" W rtkriit al, M n M ntf o tOtAl iM011 dU
Fire, Cause "ohd Out
{ y 1•
.ho.. omplo wad 1eb daM ebip rHh M► eer«wv e•Ma.N M~ 101Al ~ARif .
hhNieA Td o M.i o "r iimo"eve. T ie eMyeh_I~M rw. Mylk a r~MirN A« r:..
Nn
apvldMA a %N"It h.eh~ w fltowhfl~ 1a tt+ Pwros~ el NNNy Mid r MIMf1i0P Ae
/•r.os5 nw.h~ew:v ha, K h~.'6r akeew d enMro+e rM ~i 4t veMN1 N Nrw~
Y Mnry~h~ el raMMl~ I u~A!nrend N~~MI~ NY la leh.n Onlt. .W NNke.. A
TAX
AUPWV 14
.
Uhf , . { -n i at t ;;I
l iT - h x 7 aril.-~
te',:;}ie 77, vj,1 ~.i ir'v i rf~ ,~1 oLhy.M1'r r y..SiF
i
i
f
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING:, October 2, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM `N: Consent
SUBJECT; Purchase Order 065064 ARTHUR ANOERSOk ii CO.
SUMMARY: This purchase Order is for the afWit of the Eire
Pension Fund at an estimated amount of $4;000.00.
ACTION AEQUIRED: Approval byiCouncil
SOURCE W FUNDS: Budget 100«006-0050-6502
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend".this purchase ordor for the audit
of the Fire Pension Fond at the 'estimated amount
of $4,000,00 be approved for payment,'
EkHIBTT: Purchase Urder Copy
SUBMITTED BY: su-~-
~/'dnhn J. Marshall, C.P.M,
Purchasing Agent
i -
j 777f fr . ff } t z I~ r y. n.- I.,ry
lop w ST.
t 111gN, TX
v4v WWI own
NQM
AN04630b
VltpOf1; SHIP 1"O;
AAtilur AN+)I.n.%i(V 6 co VIRIA UCii~ RTOaNT
t2Q1 ELM 'STIWET CONFIRMATION ONLY
SUxTF 4 00 UU NUt DUPLICATE
DALLAS• Tr, 75270
ITEM ACOOUNT NUMBER UNITS, NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUNT
0 100 006 0050 11502 1 FIRE PENSION FUND AUDIT FST 40000000
f
y
TOTAL FOR P.C. ♦1.000000
The CAty of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt -,House BIII No, 20.
flNersnm P.O. Number on all U14 8hip*pts end lnvbices.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or ae Indloated.
Srfrld ~ WOW" 74; Dire4t AM,,040, a Yf.
city of.t5 nllbn, Agoou`nb Nyabli John J. Marti, C.P.Mf f0urbfujefn0 Agent
`215 E McKinney 8t., Denton, TX 7=1 Tom D,'Shaw, C.P.M. Aest, Purol►aeinp Apsnt
Ph6r* E171t 3 6170*4311 WFW Metro 247-0042
The City of Denton is an scowl opportunity employer
~f rl,'7' r rp .,9~ r°6~~
I
i
' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
HACK-UP SUMMARY SKEET
DATE OF MEETING: October 2, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA 1T0
N;
SUBJWt Purchase Order #66208 CONSOLIDATED TRAFFIC CONTROL
SUMMARY: The, City- ,of Denton has, for several years been
staP4ardize0 on the traffic sf'gnal Controher
manufactured by Teansyt, Inc. and sold 00'ysively
by Consolldate,d Traffic Control. They r'4 in
very competitively priced, 00 a quality product.
our rsan e11 are trained ..oo. thesq Wits; and we
stockoat;;gf..the repair pe'Nts. T,ran*yt has
offe,r+~d,:a pei}ial pricq;'for tho'Modet lA0 '4 p`hose
controller`d i .to ,ft large; overrun in"rodduGtidn and
new, ieare sophisticated uOits being placed on the
mar KetIn November of 1981, the Model 1800`
^66-troller was bid at 35►200,00.
c' :The`pprice'fora short period of time as reflected
on this purchase order is $1,478.00 each, This is
obviously a considerable savings to the City.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Account Number 100-002-0012-8303
Maintenance of Traffic Control Systems
RECOMMENDATION: We recb mend this purchase be approved by Council
and Purchase Order #65208 bi~ issued to Consolidated
Traffic Control in the amount of $10, 780.00 for
the (10) units,
EXHIBITS: Tentative purchase Order 65208
Zns.olidatld raffic Control
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom D. Shaw, C,P:M,
Assistant `P'urchas'ing Agent
I,
i
tl
T r Ji a
f r4='A +.l is ,l:
j' DOO MENT TYM
P, 0: N t?J► t FW
ti bti>~. 1MbfrM4' s1s 8
D4Ot1
ViJp p,..
TO.
C M0,11F.I0ATE0 TRAFFIC CONtOL CITYlCfr 09141TON
po at BOX 3401 TRANVORTATION EHOINESM:
AftLIWTON• TX ?6010
4 ' MW ACOOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, UNH AMOUI,
01 too do* 0012 6303 to #;;Oo Tk"VT'.4 PH NEMA CONTRt lq•Td0.00
K.
70TAL'FOrt P•O• 10.780•Uu
Tfb dty of Donlon, Texas is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20.
Reianie a P.O. Number on all M Shipments AW Invokes. _k Y
SMpments are F,O.B. 'dty of Denton, or as indicated.
saw Im a l m TO. f?kect AN M"uMla Toy
P. 1
Johlti J.
city of tarnt¢nAonountr. WYeWe Ma!'?>~ath.,C, M Purc~Mal ,
,
218 B. McKinney St., DMtt sn, TX idol Tom m Shaa► O.P.M. Asst. putOltiaslnp AQem
Phortie f117161d 23 61716 Wil 01M Metro 2014M
k,
TMe City of Denton Is an,egUW opportunlty employer
4 '
4 t.,
G,{: 9FTF .1 t,17 a7 :a+' - v yr syIe 9li,VF Mp i'ri'`~,•' ,p X !j v* r 'r" ~!;'b 3T. s f i u
C Y TY COUNC 114 AQl XVA
BACK-Up A YET
i
MERTYNa DATE: October Z, 1986
BUBJNCT Approval of the final roplat of the Bent Oaks
Addition
GUMNARY: This 16.6 &ors t,,raot loc7*tod on the west side
of,Ts*slor 14464` 040 2101) ad)aaent and east
of too $outbNopt Plao4 MAItion'is 60041
pl:'014 d dev
de elopment '(pD) for office and duple:
iop*ent. Tate sole purport: of the replat is
to add eledti ''The eaeements that wets omitted
from the origir►al plat,
ACTION RXQUtBRD: Apprgve the final replan
RECON000 ATION: The planning mind i6b'to'Conxission recommends
approval of the final replat.
Xt,URNATIVIS: Approve the final roplat
ATTACFMM: Reduced rsplat
DOV glliaon
senior Planner
ols'as
ad
t sPf,.t_. ~ ~ t1'J iAL~1s y~Q r, } s•l+_!
~r~ r `w, F , Iv,.I ~~R.:~ 1~i+.°~•: rrti r r'~
tf: e E~'b
I ri
wove DATA
C V C R I,
2 26' 04 333 23 151.03
4D'00,06 6000 %4.25 allow
4 IVIS $6 $413 IIS 6
Wr r i ® 1 r', lt11ay
1 Ir♦
r •pLOCK W 'I. W T r r (l 11 i ...,21h 4
ai $D
; gg II{y~ I. Y979/114
a y II
ova
J 0(mo'A Ct
V'0401216 I >I II
1
I ~ IT I y LOT ! At>
0M 46
0 i
S 1041 ~ I _;®i ~I l It~M ' tAlEIIENTt
e
;.ml~ou~A, A A
2opA u a
COMM ESMT
2*0
fIR$T NATL
H S M INC .BANK Cf DALLAS
1019/211
r ~►Si1 Cf, c ki
p mc-- `
b Tf ~1~'~/I_~IrI/
1 ~
A I '}roc otoCK ONIf0SUI lITE % I'~lOOd
rfllISST O.IL ClM. Y41HST1 I t [lo 42
~KE~yE to A* +
FINAL *CPLAr
~ I
8£NTOAK$ "
•LOM ;ONE 1 tWO
i 6 Ituo W" 0 IIN
•CALE I" 100' o,. PWLLALICII *A tV A-1006
DEN", ' TEXAS mm Ciy t CwMtr K 66 Torts
i
wauST 2r, 110114 rn,crlMC Sccic In(- PM SMT. Z0, tt1Ml
~L~,~w3•` . a ~iR '~i dY ~ .'~s 1~ a~:;'frr~ r b i
i
9 I• i i f X11
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MELTING DATE: uccuber 2, 1984
5UBJECTi Approval of the rel~minary plat of Lot 1, Block
1, Calvert Addition
SU*iARY: This is a trdct of 1,2451 acres of land situated
at the southwestern cotoor of the Bell Avenue
and Sycatiore Stri#t intetgection, The area is
currently zoned light 04ustrial classification
Mini-wat466use devoI pment to antici' ated,
'the; rop,gsed 'develq t; will ;otineot to a, pinob
rani ary' eewet ar,d,1 itih wtat lies which are
in 'place. Th" ax $t`ing ourb cut 'on'Bell Avenue
needs to be radesgne'd. Adequa
And t te electric, $ae
elephone serviices are in place or available
for extension,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approv3 the preliminary plat ;
:ECOMMENUATION: ThprovalnofgthedpYelimin~rymp]:arowirlic he ends
following conditions:
14 A maximum of one driveway on Bell Avenue,
with a maximum width of 35 feet, shall be
permitted:
2. A minimum 25 foot setback off bell Avenue
shall be required,
3. A legal opinion concerning additional right-
of-way dedication for future planning of
Boll Avenue shall. be pursued during the
final platting stage,
ALTERNATIVE: Approve the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary 'plat
av Aon
Senior hlannac
08028
imsoomealtmi. good
l saw IM.._.._ It{n of tow 4
a . COI+ft of J-11010111 IN
r~'1' ONlattt 1, 4.4', MlIt1 0 1MI dMM M a I{link M'rl ±
~ M WI eJ ` td's trl it two %ovel. ANTWI IIMi iltf of IMIr M► ~
_■~~-~'fff+sr,l t~ i Ot ISMII tflN, LIMN Mlle All 01 [pfAll 1lrM Y.i111 I~
rr- r'7 ff )It" to 0.v A5141 1wwo 'N votow 4 1 f
106 OS t~ iJt / /1 1111 /&t% III, OLLII 1.4, IN11 11.1 vou" 1111 f1la
VOWM A11 fall 1.1, D44 46A."W o/ YIl 000". aw Yli 0
3F{ y IQW WLCIM11 AS Iulwll
v t f,,a11 f 51 W 14 Of INI I LOS ON . mot Wills II6" Wr
O 41Nf mill W LOS rMN7t Nl:+f-w•Wr a wu & wMl
PR
i iNt wl,w.ro -'r { rtllh
'
AN%►/ 0/
(NIRf1 I114 1►1a .Ivl1 t0 Tw ItOat. M01M A 4, 0
olowl t:WILt 11 IMAM. { WIN IN 4611- rrr: 1 +
00 Imo n 11'1q.t9 s I. riwttl r wwj W1t,' Ithva WI
"IY Aim: ttwfl It 1131 t0 W Iw III{
1 ' fNtKl NL'lL `I t4,19111 A'. NIM lip I1 /ICO+M Wet YIM I,
AIIN'J 1 NI N 041 A 011tlKt .M I N•1'I M/\ f0 AN
PIC
II ry.t`., I9lNl1 I[iN 1 rNt11 it Nl aYtil WOW 0111 A ot1IAM!
1 2462 A RE5 n.Nl rlYt r.1 {r pW N V101
fMyplt a A~ r, { ♦ Q "+'X2'41- IIN111f1 00 0{.11l! I! C01'Itl 11 A tAAt eatl A OILTWO It III
•i R ' •`R0061 Itlt Iu AN IY{ r1I 0 trl Wtn W*11-0.041 Of. ItCAMINO 00
0 Ik 2Is III fNllt/ sv 10 tr tlunlr ,I rlrNlit 114ftmOL WT Athrum
lW :.lni WI COIItAINIM L:. N!
/ ~6 S AL 1.1 1/ A 101.0 1111 10 rNr N:r: IF
214 48, UI UINU,
Kill MUIVIE I!NY IIUCt PAN 11 •1111 rltttlMli
NAt1 II +,l, -'Al lll.t.. PP All$" 480X\ 71111 fLAT, 141100lk .
NIAIIN t[URM4 /Wtth" V . ILO" 1•' a1 108 UL''
t 4rtjA 4( A ('.ON£0eL0OR £I£Y ADb 111ua 10 1IN$ 1 cin v t1rhM. is w M OYor Nl
Li I 46W
lltl NI IVN Vk{ Nt tttl ftseNll lALadan &aI►a KNn•
C / ~ i rO Nf 'CONSIRUG1ruN 1 62-+' iW fl
I_ nN.1. t4LY 111 ._L.
!Tait ~If l14t LA
O N St'O to w. ` ,S J +1 L0+` cat" " wo" As
wom A* 04 w1 hi NMY rt,«M Mlle ill A M Iw 11,100 +o
.11410 0111111+ tat IIIIn N NO Y.A. "NOT. /Kr
OIM
' Il s 04 list & itims" IASOO NK No 10 to U MVol lE0 LI 10 1+N 1Y§mm
11% /S to ploso MIN C{'fIt WY[trt Yrr3N ~11NNlOM1 YN IN
I;ANtItt filatill
{11• 01 qa 0"6 on aaaa me SW. M JNI'lq lNII
0---
i ~ j N3ian'idiiic It♦ AIM'ioi'nriw'<inidt~ i ANYItOa'l ~wt1►1u1n
' tflMl 7231 ru fl tM/1 Mt1MrT1:
tYli h gal III IYMMttI Yttalrr MOrti)lM Slane 1
Ilrll t11IIIt f1Mt' Y. Moftm= 1111{ out. INN u &V,
A&IM11 NH11 40 Met U,MI PIM two Ilan fill "*1 1'I9
Ilal twoA I"" " /{gall" mmmt tr IN roO U" 011+
Oaa1TIN11t11Of to EIh wTawer.
1 2062 ACRES rt tN£ ua7"y,-+iliilftl LralilfM7
v ON
C111 G GOVNTYOf PINtON,YV
LO[ Id1 GOMMCRG'll VSE '
r, ahCR w A C4LYE At
304E $1'4A10CRE
DENt011, fN 14201
"T Jw
1 SQALL
IN A 1W
11<C M 1
lp~
`SaE aN1, 120' 4 0 a L'0I It MOCK I1 CALVEI~T 2WblTlbti
"Vmt~ r't (1 polwIteM a i11~w~wRs} N, S~ l♦}I
it Et.
•:..>u_'~>i0.:.4ts .d~., .r- i ,2uL,?.:n .w..~it' :1`I1'Y1; !.Y''El+..~ 1ti n nIM LFI f~4.~♦ '1M5k1 l i.I fr 'yo ...9111. I.Y. at,t t "It~i .5 1b,
S.to 111.:P1'~~IiZl34yt~;l:uY ~1. _wL.Ld.J.alW~s.L
'V{T ..ai^ i ~T ? '.T ^IP r Fns t ~1.1 ~ v lrt t ?el - I rR V till t1 e u .,I 1 l CT 'N4
oti
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 21 1984
3d8.7ECT: Appproval of the preliminary replay of Dot 2A,
Hlock 200 College Addition
SUMMARY: This is a 0.I664 wore parcel located. adjacent
and west of Welch Street between Eagle Dribo
and Maple Street. The property is coned
multi-family.(Kr-2) and duplex or four-plex
development is anticipated.,
A lot width variance must be granted by the
Board of Adjustment or Planning and Zoning
commission. Sixty feet (601) of lot width is
required and a fiftywthree foot (534) wido lot
is proposed. The building inspector has deter-
mined that parking requirements, setbacks, and
all other development standards can be 'met, and
that a 53' wide lot would not be,incompatible
with existing land uses in this older area
(minimum 50' lot width was the requirement prior
to 1959).
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat.
ALTERNATIVE: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Q sh n ,
av eon
Senior'' PlAnnei
k
`A oa14g_
. 1
lot
r Y r ! ~ ~ ~YI ~
{4 404/4 1
4r1Y, its I~rrliTi~'►""AL 1 .
Mill 1~1T 111 . a
/Af~ tAt Ly►1I~o1ri:J11 61 11"4,1 NAnLNM1 6i61fi1W M fM ~t><i liM
61.16100 rtit91~1r
tN 9166 4961
1 f
(^l latest too" / 1t6YAw" N 1A,14 "of Y
• 011"N N6Y M4x:1~t Also I v 6640061 so? & 0141atoa N
M
III 11 6 rN'n111 1 N 1111/"111 It awg6 rY17 A at" *it
"lioct10M1 c"""N mwo ~ 1I 1411 1 •M M N N 01 N4eiilltoir OMY/ inai ~±i1iN 1196.
'to
1 "1++6400 tat /illt11N NOi
W.I 1y. 101 t.A. i 01 LA6M
t! r !10' (•6 i II sW twatoal total moo 61 "Oil P SOMI
1A
t1Af 00 st NI N"4t ts"814 Lot 4446" AN J49196 at
feet o►, __Lr 01101" to 6101 4011 "so otl`AT. sagisMls6 -"a' "";I
• 60091;11111 IOZ►L►fr Al Ht 841 tL00f 11, r tomb 96000 •oltte
,'1 900.11 {'l~
• I HN, Ao o a:a 11061" . n16
1 t1 MI it" 6 tl
N 1tiMnwm Gw 1111 111001 f,~l Itl 6LIC 461 IO/t~ttl ftt 9ftNf1 Y► oUgltr +411191 1600".
eee"e"t AM "A
' \ Ntw CIANI„1Hpn16611S 00•
LOT 2, RUA LIN W6161 914.•
WHIM Elf"7it+t'~
41444u.:.
j01136 0, *Gas"
1. see rl; I or. Or
f/112 I \ I1Ai1 Or 1100011 71
1. COrMt1 01 •I01IOM IN
II04641L 00, too t6aawsk~ w1 1§ Orr Itll MI• µ~"►R~*1
0 su" W "to !41 1i/~NtA4Yi : "talc ILIA 66.44
.ynYl
I `.r ; It►+tLl Yt ooliaia 46 ! "16 rr o611a me W ,.yM~~04
Y I • 2 r r1a66s0 amN "616 A1: L6N4st006 bommos 1 too""W0
Zi M K rILLI0Y7,N Y,M 406 A"SWLS"00 M " "At wn 1" &am so "A
to Rpool Aso 0"ISM01006 1644131 "16611006, 4Y t1 to e4PAt001
10 t _ lot111o 1141160
! A 01180 40000 ro 6A06 As$ •1AL of allies Mto -sit of
r ~ 1
r ,
1..I. I 1
oU1Li ! "DillOM IO nttea'6 to+ltriCA11
GI a. P *W OR, L104 ""tit 000 go "tog ta"40161
r' 4 StA1, 11 Wl 00 Y4MMItt1 t``wllHwo 16M661"w"6. "K1t1M, me
YI •1 401161 44611"' 14At't to 696 fait $Lot "M • ArrtALAM..
i ICOOAr+ "AVIV 00 tit LAM A" "at 1fa'too Ia"ns a61111M 999164
MA► Moss 1,6669 r"U 111 N6N1AL 60f00stol6 to 4000aotWlQt rlf4 la+
46619* to 60 "it 0'4" as 0000",
111
I~ 016114 ACHE ly tHi -
CItY a, COukyy0la11M0k,1k.
I L01' AM IUA11f&MILY. UfC
U ALE owkMi JACK Ot0R6t
rs 403 EAGLE 00
,
l~ a d Aa iY Af a ld wilm Tx 76,201
1
PIELAMAW 01 AT'
sot's",►d A '•'R1p 49C',2A,40Cit20:'ODLirE¢L 1.
» coNSiM ~1,e E !~lCMIl4lK i SURVEY AEi'!N
0 IS
dT E, , ~OUN1'Y•, Of Dftlft."'1644,
ly"I kill,
sf
i Afd~IkiL'I«LEP.tn~ , " <afi~ALl i-".1. A _y
,..r~+T
iT'fnI i.A 1 ii, ^r", +a+ 777
CITY COUNCIL A0WA
BA► x.Up dUMMAkX SHUT
MUTING DATEt October 2, 1964
SUBJECTI Approval of the pr(iliminary plat of North Texas
Industrial Park, Phase Ii
SUMMARY. This is a 25.0 acre parcel located adiacent'and
west of Woodrow Lane and north Pf Shay Oaks
Drive, The pro arty is zoned light industrial.
(LI) and ten (1~) individual lots are being
platted.
Major public improvements toquired include
p rimeter street paving for an'.approximately
900 foot section of Woodrow Lane and an exten-
lion of'Morae Stest (approximately 1, 300, feet).
Morse and Woodrow are secondary major arterials.
A bridge ,is'aleo required at tho east end of
proposd Moue Street. The Planning and Zoning
Commission 4nd City `Council have the authority
to require construction of the bridge at the
time of development or accept an escrow payment
or performance bond arrangement, The owner has
requested that a 10 year performance 60pd be
acceppted at this time because no development
is planned east of the bridge, site. The Public
Works Department and the'Developutant Review
Committee recomWended construction of the bridge
at the time..of development when the Planning and
"Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of September 260 198.4. The Planning and
Zoning Commission considered the owner represen-
tative's,request f-or acceptance of a ten (1U)
year performance bond, but the Comrilssion has
recommended construction of L:he bridge at the
time of'Aevelopment. The ownEr's representative
has, requested that, he be allowed to address the
bridge issue when the City Council considers the
preliminary plat.
Minimum 81' wager and 8" sewrer"are proposed
across the frontage of interior lots aod;a 10
sewer line is proposed for extension along the
east boundary; that would tie into the Pecan
Creek 10" interceptor. A 20" watermain exists
along the Woodrow ;bane frontage, Substantial
dioifilw •0sptpw li:4t0 t+~quivod, including a
bra"dge 'a't ih,o east bbUddAry d .p#opoaed Moue ;
5t`reet. Ado4uate.alectxtr, gas, and telephone
services are,:in place or, available for extension.
r t , n .'~+c ~u=r• n i~ nd:i } i,
1 , G.1 ;11 4
4.~,n~ Gaunoil ~~~kup ,
0~„ h 'C9xae IndiJoticial park
ph'Aee II
October 2, 1984
ACTIUN REQUIREUt Approve the preliminary plat with oc without
recommended condition
RECOMMENUATIM 'rho Planning and 'Lening Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat with the condi-
tion that the bridge required at the end of
propos,ad Mcrae Street: extension be constructed
when development occurs.
ALTERNATIVEt Approve the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT; Reduced plat
aV ion
Senior planner
0265,E
I,Ji
- ,i t ~f{4:1 f f l ,;1 ..Sr torn r~tf Bi r`td , i
e
P!6a
"r 17 1}tY {"i i~s~r, } v w .rJ.' -4u y' }}:+1k4 C ry N a4~ rar ,r, r
Ut+^(NU i1
lo+r'f fl°4 1 k r e
U
i~+~~1 44r
+ I M ,,-bN r1n(r ~ur gWnMM gqt 4110A
lqr I N,W°MYM tw~l a0 •~A 1 4~
Ir. 111 / I 44 • lr
y l~ ~l I. V.' '1~`+.."^.. \.n f\(\1 0~+ 4N4rrdl !Oil
E
btotk off.. ,
IsHv, low
i
Adm.
A from low"
MOAS! ~meEr ; ,r a °w
to r
I
+ ly"• "w"thm two
s UTURf. ^CvF.40V0.)E/.1T
~ } a~acx'~ ~ rwe~ ~
' I • Y♦Mt 1MMlItIl u1L tOM' ~ '
1014 r 11 u1 Item
d ~ 6 M p 11
(~c'r PIELG$, EDWARDS ASS ATE$INC
/ Me Itlef •IPHt sent ...f♦°. "I" M"
uM Ow,sit I6111 s".1tl1 rtu ..011 0I MtN 4"•161
FUTURE wvct or
/Gf,VEL0PME N T ort°w,s Wit r~. sa
U°M1 rYMA}`rll to" MM[LHAMIA" 04AT
' NORTH TEXAS 111OuSTRIAt FMRK 00 U$ A A-4
u
tfto*wv 4k- "0
' CITY OF bEN'OW# AEfN~4N1aU~tTV~ Mt
L by
JI.1 + Gbh1 Lr Ndt
' Vfrl M'
'~~ri)r~ YI'~ I in~':•1 ,~(:i rr, ~ ~f:" P it },ri ~~J: a' h~k~ ~ rd r ~ r'tii.F In +{i t: 4L~..5 ~'i't ~~4'. ~•Lr~~r fy.."
~ r'
CITY COUNCIL AMDA
BACK,-UP SUVMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: October 2, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of Lots 1 and
20 Block to Rayner Subdivision
SUMMt1RYi This tract comprises 5.2364 acres situated
adjacent and'eaAt of Inman Street, and adjacent
and north of the I-35B service roads The area
is xoned`'commorciai (4) and mini-warehouse
devilopmint is antioipated, Inman is an'unim-
roved perimeter street. Access from I-35E will
limite•i. A major'pioblem is insufficient
q;,s u ity of existin water faoilities4 the
c ;i~Vision regulatlo' ns require a 1500 gallon
q' "winute water b'utput for adequate fire
J, ~,tecti6n'~ for meOum intensity com,eroiai land
~il4es. At 1this point, it is felt that this
st'andaird requirement cannot be met by existing
filaili,ties. An 8 inch water `line would have to
b installed t:r pro;vide the required flow,.
T;'ere is need for alternative sewer facilities
VA the form of a septic tank to be installed in
riooordanae with Article lilt 4.10 of the Denton
Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
'Adequate electric, gas and tel"'oplone facilities
are in place. Provisions for i4provements for
Inman Street must be made during the final
platting stage#
ACTION 'REQUIREDt 1. Approve preliminary plat with or without
conditions
2: Deny preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: ".'he Planning and ZoningCommissi'on recommends
a>)proval with the fi~llowing conditions:
1. A septic, tank peinit which will accomoaate
mini-warehouse use only must be approved by
the 0iredtor of, iTtil~ties before a final
plat is 'approved.
One driveway 16cated between lots 1 and 2
and centered along the common property line
shall he'p:+rmitted on the 1-35 service road.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve preliminary plat'wi.i•.h or without
conditions
2. t4h ptoll P SI
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary play
0801'
David E '~.400,n,l Sen,.a ~pl~ner, -i1
>d. e Ott i} if! a1 p r L;~+ t .ro frti..,
.tt<~x t\"1 kw~iFr`1,{N3~E.1h_Il....~ailEltf~i.d 1 o:. tt q+ 'S
Old of o1q: I At.
a» w I
, -rr+.. f YIN R{R I 0
I ti \
I;
4 ,
t
x I
L T' Oar 2 M
59 Acr 1 2.376 Aarns
R Oft »I wRRt St
sod
14 44
00
1' • to
oMltll,tor /Oust
tw o►LLRt I*
d otN T014 Ix ?4101
iC RLt.. tom' 00.r, • t:
,
I` via Ty
p~
AMMKTT M':NA111t ,
i
f'~~~'~~~ ~i ~ ~ 1~ lSl , 1 1!~j: AS e 4; ~ i' '1>~ ,I,~G { T.~1~Va 1
7 i~ f < urn si ,t f ~ ~ r. ~ ~ `Y ~.1J p~Y~ ) u, ~ 9 •'a ~f. 3$6s.~~f~~i~l- ~Nl y~1).~T ~iA ~~i
Flit 703
CITY COUNCX)~ AftWDA
BACKUP SUMIMRX 6T
MEETING DATZo October 2► 1984
SU9JECTs Appproval of the final replat of Solar Wry
Addition► Sections I and I2
SUMMARYs The above referenced final, replat is e.6n4istent'
with action previously 4isc4osod during the
change of coning process and oonsidettation of
lots 29 and 30 of the Solar Way Addition. All
lots as shown on the final V-tpl:4t reflect cur-
rent land'use and lot sire condit'ionse The sole
intent of the replat is to officially record and
dnoumOnt the area as it currently existse The I
Planning 'akid zoning Commission approved a waiver
of standard subdivision improvisaants'and tech-
nidal requirements at a previous sooting,
The owner of lot '34 spoke in opposition too, the
replat at the planning."and Zoning Commissign
meeting citing the configuration and flood 'plain
concerns with lots 2A and 2Ee One of the plait-
ning and zoning conudissi'oners also 046'~eated to
lots. 2A and 2B being replatted'froA one lot
originally to two hots as shown on the replat.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of the final replat
RECOMMENDATIONt All owners of lots in the preceding subdivision
were notified in compliance,wtth state statutes
and local requirements gover►i'it g the rapist of
lots zoned or 'deed restr,i'cted for two family or
single family use. Official reply farms re
aeived in opposition (total of 2 oppposed ahd 5
in favor received out of 14 mailed) does not
amount to 20% in opposition..
The 'Planning 'and Zoning Coo-aission recommends
approval of the final replat by a vote of 5 - 2.
AhTERNATIVEs Approval or denial of the final repl'at
ATTACHMEki Reduced replat
D&V son
senior Plainer. !
i
04300
f r1 ew ~rn v^ ~.;yp -y(• N`7 i h ! } ff to IM1W
it ~ t 1~ ) ' S J
r
I 1~ I 6.0'4Aa
~I 4411'1,/1/
W111 A"*" 1 4 R. o••ho•, M aT,l al
1
+ ' 1
W tn. SOW. M Z A
t 1.0000
' ' N /~1 t • S u
? i eaa«vwlU.: Tn•N••I,f•• b 4a46m,M 040000,00 M J ►M,on tvoo",1•t
~`"a? NJ\ EA 7 S 4 3A
y" Mg\I OOIIAG 1086Ac, elf At 1 x R5$ Ac A 303 as I. SG! a i
`11 PC N SE T10N 441 AL yC~A 7
, I "9[ff~e Y. N 1.1, 3 e ~ ! I~ B
J
J. , JJA¢ r 653AC
'+0• i
+I 5p,•.f~~`s• 1'4104' • ~y!_N6'g11U_w✓ d '2p 1Y70 ~ I~~-
L uf,. 't R'' AA9 21 IW
MI
W Z4 It
9. IA'
A N
O .M1tt !00+!00, hl d"' 5.0 y, f p
An,
N 145 AC.
••MI••,M . N
Y h f1ti JfaNr,/M O 6LMMIyr• P,
A 4 .onalen ! fl fA^+NM M. 7t 1 ft" ft
a
1
ti 86 10 it 12 13 IaA
1 049 Ac. 3636Ac. 1226A4 10161 AC. 90?Ac 703Ac
6
W r u ~ 1 rd, 11,
Sit: gee
M
~.14f55 ~+5~~ N. ~ ~ • I yj1J 14
663 At.
C
BO';2d'
41 ~ti Tn^S+1ti~fN 1
N 42'62' 'N o-' Ttilt
?S T6 y4*WE` S 14232 1.048AC. ~W 15 ty
16 F
W0 ah, ~s21aC _
T
I I {{t1• I FM
19 *n •St N1, F• stt«, F«
1041 "
.'.C4 MAP
Z 1 ':100 0 w
Jim
~ 44l~'Si'Se 11. 41~woM, IN. ~
'1 s t4 p r
,,I r e totn',~s'A3'Il?VJ. r
` t3T.ta t f
s
u r II , " I "I , , 1 1 1 / 6*04 ~404 r ~SOL A R w,A,y ab0`iTION,'~1
Nam
r' 1'",;~ Sad 1Dq
ctipn 0~~ 1~ 4b4e 1 a w,l S~ctEon
ti , t l~S 14 ' }y (1~4 '^11, Ih~~lrr ~Jf ~V ,i ~~11 f Y~y ~ 1~'''11 ~rl li 1o rYt~l
. 71
DfN~"x'QAl, TtX" MUNICIPAL SUILD(NG ! DE'NT'ON, TEXAS 76201 ~ TELEPHONE (817) $66.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE OF MEETING October 2, 1984
CISPY COUNCIL AGENDA IT1;Ms
Approve T" Refund
SUMIMARY s
Chapter 31, Section 31.11 of the Texas Property
Tax Code requires t1A appic,val of the governing body
of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $504,00,
Taxpayer, Edith S. Tucker, has requested a refund
in the amount of $641.10 for years 1915 through
1983.for erroneous payment of a duplicated
tax account.
F18CAL SUMMARYt
Financial Impact, $641.10 to be refunded,
ACTION RI,QUIREDi
Apprival. of City Council
ALTERNATIVES:
If approved, the refund will be issued.
STAFF RECOMNOATION s
Talk Assessor/Collector recorgends'that refund be issued.
EXHIg2TS:
Attached %
y v w'~ -e^ ;;n-+ e,~+' errr yr ,
t ' A +~n T*'Fm" _ rvro TT' T'- i 15VP(`
PIP
di
01"3$
x
ISM Nun
pay to 9641.10
nt
Edith B. Tucker FTMANCL/TAX
part~eot
13532 erasmer September 14, 1144
Dote
Dallas, Texas 75234
Tax Account: 3761-00800
IOVA e Invoice da r ow! tion Account No Net nv, unt
t
Refund due to duplicate accounts for 160-6004 $477.92
same tract of land 100-6002 163.18
$641.10
i4
MAL '
The above has been reviewed and recoaoendation for psyywent is side by the undersigned.
cowtint Approval lirnatura
City Manager Approval Director of Tiaanea Approval
j t y ' F , ; , ,r vRt`.?$9?T 1.7wt' y .ampr" ~r~.t' '.'~T.vl.?9P' >nS•.'iym.Y/Rla': t\'.'~1'.~.llt.~"YY ll'~' ~i
1 •
r
hxt>~tdd App~lwi~on'~1.12 !Zlat~' 1, _ •
. APKICATION FOR TAX RVUWC
Callectin9 office Naak ,
Co i l ecti n4 Tax for: city of tae Tax hem
a i ng t
1114 lost M0MV4""6q# to. a ,
s~
city* state Zt p Cody
1
In order to 40'91y fors a tax refund, the following i nforwtfon must be provided
by the taxpartr.
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER:..
Namer- Edith e. Tucker
llrlr~■rrgrr ilrrr~ll■■rl rl■Ilrlrlrrr■Yr r■Illr■IIrYYYrrYYYlI Ir IrY■■11 Y■Yr rYYrIYY
Address: 1353 r gmer T g 752a4
r
Tel ephone er accizional t orate ion s ne
IOE MT (CATION V PROPERTY:
OeSeription bf Proporty: Tract 36, 4.SMAftes, Malkei survey, 01330
r* S a oaa 1 n or roperty:
Account (Number of Property 1. 3761-00800 or ax cep u er:
ONFOMATION ON PAYMENTOF TAXES:
~!ttaaAe-of ~ Taxi nq Uni t~ Year for Amount of Tax
From Which Refund uhfch Refund Date of the Amount. of Tax Refund
Is Requested is•Reguested Tax Payment Taxes ~Paid _ Requested
1. City of Denton j975 -'83 1119 S 641.10 S 641.10
34 19 19~ S ~ S
Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documwitation) :
Refund due to duplicate accounts on same'propertx
rr++rr+r +rr II.~ r nYr r r Ir r
Y~/r'M.Yr~.rYY Y rrrrrl ■..r..r Irrwr. .rYY~rr.rlr - - ' ....~:..r■■,~~
r 1
"I haitby apply for the refund of 'the above defcribed taxes and certify
that the inform:Cion i have given on this form is truo and corrsct."
See Attached Set er 14 1214
S1 gna e rA a pp t ca ton or ax Re fund
rrrllrr~~•Ir.lr.~■Irrrr~~rrrrrr rrrr«r+rrlrrra.rr~rrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrr+~r.r.rrr-IOYrrrrr.rrrr
0MRMI NATIONf FOR TAX REFUNO: Approval Disapproval
gna ture o u:Mr*1 zed M car to
tgr►ature or resactng rrtcer~s ar laxzng ace
Unit(s) 'for refund applications over SSCO
i. ~r 1T r.y » n Jw1 ^•♦v ~~1 • 5 1,! •r 1 . r.\ ~ ,n' !
i •
/t L ~ , •q~r\d ` ,~,J r A '~.S' ~,iµ~ , ~ A ~;•~ti'rl! f, 1 r ~ S.,rA +[f
( ~r O• 1LY ..r~M. .N {~'':.y ~J f\ ` t M } ?:l ~t iYAllpf
.
r•.iwY'•.{. !;1( 'r',t~~t ~,t 7 ' 1t'
i t 41 IN
r. r ;i r
rvt + ;f.:.L.L~~.. *a S' f 1.1.5 •j 'f ,ci Y1 t , ASS
r1 fi~` ~ "rl1~v r d A f. Y:, ~ t ~ ref / 1 r~
i
~r~yI"- 1 i f , . t 'j4,Z'Y x ,
1 rt't^ F' 2 .ti yri ♦1„ Y"„.1 fs 1`T..t' P,.iL RLi
41
'$r. .ti^A~~•Yk ji 1~{t'v y^~1.~, aN ~ y.,~•~ » ' rs~.., r• r t , S+ c c.l 1 h'~yt jR.w `+j
`r► ~4J ~,3~~n Rm
C' t yAv ~f'♦ -LEGAL
r ~ .,t} V~~71~.y,'Y t 1 + ~ i i..: 1. ~,~y< tw n /y. ' ,,-,,,A.; ,~}y1 i `
C r 1 ~ (n 111N a': l 1 • i ♦w ~ a '♦J»~ ~TNf~ } ~t"',>~"k,{axy 1~ Yv;' ~ ' Lr r
1w T
11 l♦. ,h r r~/~yA.P~u*i' f~l2lf A 1~ N I i ; rJY «V
~6( ' f y~' 1 si ' ' ~•,f. r~P ir ~ • 'r r.1',.-,. ♦ y 5 ~a i i,t•1
lryy ♦ 4 11F y.N : t~S t ♦ , _1I 1 tF~ya 7 y, rt~,Z/ Vl l ~ r :..rv' 1 y i 1 ~ ~ { rr1 1
7, 4k'♦ Koji
1•' ,•r~t ' 1 t ~s ~kr f.,.' f
f , f v 1Aa. Frl
T YSAVtL r r • »
P~l
'.T ~}N. i4 rr ~>.~t{ y' r A ry-YW i - Y~. : :.i f L r ..a. ~,•r•.' 1
a ~ }>`r t • ~~.S,b~r .l- n f. r G~L~ , t t 1 y~-~(( r
r ~~i~r
w i !qF hs I4•, r 'RA7w~ 1 ♦.r~i~ 1\.
t~ 1 ~ 4
I w l.. t 7
9' ~4i f jt.+•,;i1 *~`....r T r "f' ( '{i..1 ~t .~i may fl..t 1 ~Z ~
r, ~,f,~)a S. ♦ ; ' A ~ ' SL ti~{'44 : , r ; i i t1 ~ i a .r t
r+♦I~~ r`~('~ 1r\1`~a~7 j. ~~y./ vy:.a: ,T .'.r...1 ;Sii~t 4~ y', r 4 Hr ~Y•~ju L
V
r
+
. ~N • 1, ♦!~f~ ~ C}' .
A yM ~
*.y ty~•'!p rrt. > t 7» a , ?t wY: ":rt+xtay„„ , 1 3, i~
r'• ~.r..i~~ ta'r's y'' iF+'{u~•~.. •!',~tt~y
S t s r J
~ r ~i / r Y .i..Y t''.'\ ' ' ~~:f1•.i'M..~. ' :2 •?yr/.1 7 it , r;+y rf w~ ,.i♦l'M~ ^tit
{ i:; .L \ ♦a li'= tt7 J~I..a' r, ,T Z » it y 1 F v~lc S 1 11u~w n/ ~ ~'tyf v 1
y AfY~ ! rrR'~T.ZL Yl r v ' .'A.~ d~~L,i 3 ].~-~.~4'va.~'r S!r. \ frh r+A.y C fi ~~+~Y
a' e^ ~ 1 'lT
tz ;r.., i ay Lea; t 1. py.Y .S,L ,7:* few'' ,»~..A ~a x,r. c, .•.f ,r la'o •L%3'\}.,.x t1;
ir.
(M A x tw.f ~ "'3 ,A y f ~.1 r' l.e= , W~ i; • i ^Y ~ fr ~ ~,t [ iii ~.tr r
I' r~! r M\~ r r y4 '..t+ s+r" r , ,r ti a r : t
~y;'Y r.iaj{L"t•}r t Ai••+}4~: !r• u r ,.Y- r. ♦ f .~J ,f.i=~f .S":~~'~
• . /'i ~ ~ t ti. bM.= Sardr4,t ~'t~{ii. ~ • r ~ r•:~♦I;i Ti"; , = f r,y'
' t » ,y, ,f ~ ''AID J+ lY • i '~/kl'~'1
.t r. N'1'. t + 1
rr*
MOW&
• ! j Y 1 r , 4 ~~.h• i
' , s 213 '3A T 1fro
rzszz A.
~s.Clt a:~f ',psi j k~o'
a' "Moor ftooiev.40.
630
• ,.D&Unquen:. TaxAiscords.,.thox• that. .you. owe. the fallowing' :mounts for-ttt+
airs indicated, oa , the f ollowia8 described, property:
G. Walker Survey #1330
Tract 36 2.590, ac
ute.est =d penalties in this statement are calculated to:.• j, .y 31,1984
1
1 tr
i~COUNT NO. YEAR PENALTY OF TAX b PENALTY DUF Oi
63761•►00e00 1982 S79.
' Z5 19'02 98.27
1961 60:1: 21.64 81:75'
190 60.11 23:14' 83.25
1979 57. 78 2S:71 93.49,'
1978: 57.78 25.18 96.%
1977 $7.78 3.2.65. 90.43
1976 9.25 5.78 15.04
1075 8.84 6.06 14.90
IQ83 87'0 S554.01
~,,?l'••Z $201
'
OF
y P
~AN.98 x
day ~ • ~ . .
IS STATE 1- IS FOR -CITY 'TAMPA OILY, AND DOES NOT Y,fC='S TAxEs, DUB, TIE
MW IPEPMMWT SCEML DI TRI CT ''I.
;C
1,4 5 PAYABLE' TO: ~~I?Y OF DENTON
14
DENTON, TEXAS 76201
W
. ••w~wi,ll lY~w.~.~.~~w:..~.~ww,.~~.+.~ki„M ~wMrw .lelCC.N`M•.r•~..NM w.~orrw. • ~.i ♦.r «'.i
AAhip
TAX SWIIENT ►,l ,tY A 11 Arl/f
O AILt rat
i
413344 G. WAL,Ka • TRACT 34s AC
Y
I '
i
Isi's
.I
is.flaa ft 7. a
.
too .0
4 06 3
3x909
oaNyam couNrY Tait' rcK ca
I 620 fq 1IQRTN
Ot?N 1CN 1'X 76201
Y* A TA%tS Apt ow otTow c(t), e/ Ptatir Tii OrMrr.w~r
TAX STATEMENT it' ,
ONARY IHcam s . $44tLNO $4 ~ r. ai
$101 00 "NALTY AND INT~q
} iSTDETAILS. • MkNt)w*A*
ri COtI! , i ~
r
AID, .
i
r N
P44
i
- I',
-a > P4 vy • ; °zWP'~°'~
' PLA NtM4'A,N6 ~;ON~Nf~'~COMM~IS$IbN
RECOM ENDAYION TO'THE CITY 0WIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1687 Meeting Data,. October 2, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Harvey A. Thompson
2011 Br6Mn St,,
Denton, TX 76201
Requested Action: Changge in zoning from the single
family (SF-10) t6 the planned,
development (pD) classification
purpose: To develop the following land uses:
1. 144 acres of neighborhood service
lend use
2. 2.8 acres of zero lot line land
use
3. b64 acres of condo-cluster
housing (maximum density of 12
units per acre)
4. 6 *6 acres of office warehouse
land use
6, 2 acres proposed park
location and 'Size: An approximately 180 acre tract
located `at the northeast'corner 'of
U.S. Highway 380 and 01d North Road
Existing Land Use: vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Single family, Vacant; SF-10
South - Commercial, vacant; C, A
East Vacant; SF-10
West • Apartments, vacant; MF-1
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity.
ry q~,14qits r' n i j. `TT r : d ~p pl' F F `.Trt 4; !'+t d
Pageeiwoz-168Y)
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: Draine a is not a major concern at
this site and 'as always it can be
handled during the platting phase of
developeent.
Utilities: A 10" water line and a 12" sewer
line are available to this property,
Electric service is available and
thould be underground service. Gas,
pphone, and cable TY, services will
be provided as development occurs.
Transportation: Th t.3i.tr' has, frontaye,on U44 Nigh-
w y( 38q Ip''o major arterial i
0 110 Road c ri~Ary *a or aOtt rial1.
and q.1d Oarti~ Road (co Tector).
Trawnsportation engineering h;es recom-
iRen%e that. access be, p.rovi~ded from
i
internal' streets Mather than Old
North Road or U-.S. Highway 380.
ANALYSIS
This.si,te is located Yn a low intensity area. According to
the Union Developppent Guide, low intensity areas represent
the efty's pripo housing areas and'should emphdsixe residential
u;e. Approxlmatoly;one half, of the proposed development is
reserved for residential use. Low,iii`te»sity areas should cor-
respond, to ancwerell ;Igfots density;, o.,f 4.7 units per acre. The
in ensity.of+'the pro' o3ed devilop~fent is`+.8 units per acre
which is;sllghtly over the standtrd`for the entire area; how",
ever, this area is not over the stAndard based on existing land ,
use or existing toning,
I, .
The Denton Development Guide also encourages a diversity of
6641 1 no types;:in all sectors of'the city, The pr6p6sed'ter.o lot
line and condo-cluiter areas would `serve to diversify housing
types in this;section of the city. The zero lot line and park
sections of the proposed d0t1 opment are buffers between the'
existing single %m ly W ID) section to the north and the
higher intensity office/retoll uses of this proposal. The pro-
posed park site will also serve to buffer the residential uses
in this-yropotal from the muttl-family units to the west of Old
North Road.
77W777vF~,`"'.;
Page Three
ANALYSIS (Continued)
Now Deve opme'nt Guide policy issue #78 recommends that
concentrations of office/retail 1404 use in low Intensity areas
be limited to four (4) acres, The proposed development contains
7.9 acres of office/retail land use, approximately twice the
area recommended in policy issue 07B.
RECOMMENDATION
This proposal was submitted for consideration before staff was
instructed to use the proposed revisions of the Denton Devel-
opAeot 49ide4 to this cesOc the policy, in question..Is policy
issue 0 4 1lmiting concotrations of office/retail land-use in
1 w ,intensity areas to tour (4) 4c,res. After careful considers-
t on of this Issue, &1~+o 4-06 issue' of inCreaeed trofficl~t the
i.nterseo;tion 'ofOld North ppa4d .arid 81yhwIty 1140, the .016.1a and
Yonino Coriimi,:4'1on rocomoo"Il4, denial oi~ x-1.687 by a Vote of 04
If the City Council 's inclined to grant this request, the
following conditions should be appllads
11 Specific site, plan appproval, is re.gvirod for the office/
warehouse; Con'da/cluster, and'neigh,b r`hood service sections`
of the 011anned develo'pieent.
2. Access to the condo/cluster and office/warehouse sections
shall be from internal streets only,
34 Parking lot lights in the office/warehouse and neighborhood
service sections shell be positioned awey from existing and
proposed residential housing to the north.
ALTERNATIVES
16 Ap'pro've petition without conditions
2. Approve petition with conditions
3. deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aer.,Ial
2. Planned development concept plan
3, Reply form totals,
4. Property owner list
5. Minutes o' the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
August 22,19$4
07b5a
Vir,
n' L 1,
+ } *e
•'M
P'
J~e..:.v ~ . ~ i ~ ,i~ a r
• ~ ` .fig
a ',.r►t ~ ♦ t,.. r ''f f~~}
~Y Aa it
r
P~x
L
{r . /
M, F. 1 C 10
I,
M r. • I x
i R Ot L~NE~
Le ,
PAo a
0
h1, F. I J 5 F 10
CON00•%I) T C A .NOUSINO
Nil
0P ~
OFFICE/LWAREHOUSE
A At OCNCRAL. RETAIL ~JrUr M
~fR9Jry X00 fY
COMMERCIAL
CObIMtRCIAL
µ*ti 1~ f IMMYA~t VMN Ow DRYV
PLAT" "Y
~ 1J
l CALLED 16 14 Aare!
SCALY 3' 00' 4 CARTCR SURVEY A•Z115
JUNE 21, NM A IS LONGSOTTOM. SURVEY A,115
Gi'v al COUNTY of OtNr N, rCXAS
i.
u
w 7, ~r 777
7Y IFIV, 'r F
at 1 1
noplaTY 4W1 'fit "1t LY f4
CITY COttl M
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received None Received
t~, 4. err Yr 'G4'.'„7Rr a777711111 ~
r.. it 6
jou Au
r ;
4
,
~i' s 7<
f , ML, 6
r ` }
c'
7 i;
i
emu.. ~
7 7 '17 7`7
i
7+ _
loo
Z b oo
76 5 Ail,
qi6
mom
1/ 7A.L
10 04 i~ 5
Ito AW
1A A.,
OTT VI 1
1
MOM
~a
E
r
LOJ;lt
L
74
;j
.471
rf
PVWW
e f
V r
r
n8 Y, It I Lq
r
t
IH
d'
r .,'j.p"R(" •.rr a! 771 Pf'
3 1
Minutes
A"4st 22r 1984
Page
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Sidor stated `there seems to be some confusion with
regard to the Denton Development Quid** The petition
was in the mill before the changes to policies were
being drafted.
Mr. Curen stated he has a problem with 6,044 square
foot lots. He stated he doesn't want to loosen up our
standards.
Mr. Sidor stated in a planned development,,theyy can
request any lot any size they want to for Commission
approval. He stated it make$ the lots more affordable
to those who can not afford a larger lot and in some
areas more desirable.
Mr. Sidor made a,motion to recommend approval of 2-1686
with the following conditions:
1) Specific site plain appIroval is required for all
multi-f amily,dovelopment,
2) Maximum height of multi-family structures shall be
limited to two (2) stories.
3) Single family (SF-7) land development standards,
except for lot size, shall apply to the 6,000 square
foot single family lots.
4) That 'electrical services shall be underground except
for major transmission lines.
Seconded by Chairman LaForte and carried 4-2.
(Vice-Chairman' Claiborne and Mr. Escue voted no.)
C.-.1 87. This is the petition of HSrveX A.. Thompson
requsating a change in zoning from the single family
(SF-10) classification to `the planned development (PD)
classification on'an 18.1 abre tract located at the
northeast cprner'of University Drive (U.S. Highway 380)
and Oid'Norih Road. If approved; the planned develop-
mint will permit the following land; uses:
rn 'Ti^"C +"i'(~'~ [+i?,"Sl` I' 1, 40• j~f'.°°4Firz:?`v;;."T.r ht~,•S'Gn'Sn. ~e°t',✓P,''4';ro't
F r
777 Tq
fs~ V a a Ninutea
August 22, 1984
Page 8
r.
1.4 acres - neighborhood service land use
244 acres - propposed park
fc' 695 acres office/Warehouse use
5.4 Bares - dohdo"Cluster housing, 65 units
r, with a densityof 12 units per core
2.8 'acre: - veto lot line land use, 22 units
with a density of 7.9 units per acre
Has Spivey, stated there '4r* 12 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of the sub act property;
6 were returned in favor and 1 undecided. he pointed
out where the proposed land uses are on the tract.
' Mr. Charles Watkins stated he is, with Oiel,ds to Edwards
and•ie representinq Mr. Hotvfy thompson.. He stated,'Mr.
Thosrpeon cau~wf to hiM sevoe&l' oohs ago,.and asked thus
to dtvei4p a 1464" plan for `this a 'acre tract: ne !x»
piained the area land; us,*& and the roads in relation to
r traffic. He atoned the development, is constrained by
Highway 384 which is elevated, and obviously generates a
o"t,0- level because of the traffic on the,roods He
noise
of
stated there is oor~ vi
? Highwsy 360 'and bid North Road.,yor all of these
reasons, the south portion of the tract is not suitable
for mingle family residential development.
st He stated it was felt that a sfnall neighborhood service
use as well as 'an office/warehouse use would be;obmpat-
' ible with the physical characteristics on the south side
of this tract. It was also felt an office/warehouse and
convenience store would create the least negative impact
on the neighborhood and still meet the needs of the de-
veloper.
He further atated following along these sage lines, it
became necesaary to make a land ,use transition between
'the existing SF'"l0 under construction, over .to•tbe pro-
posed neighborhood service'and,the office/warehouse land
uses. Also, was felt"the necessity for a lAN use bCeak
of some kind from the:; multi-ifaiaily use existing on, the
other aide' of Old Nor°th 6oad and 'the' multi-family. 'xgning
there, so.we put in a park, at; .the cornerbnd are. pr'op'os-
ing zero lot line housing`immedi'ately on, the south side
of Northwood Estates and then proposing condom'iniiim
cluster housing at a 12 units per acre density level to
make a transition over to the proposed office/warehouse
r°
ee,
d°~b7}.F' Y}fi r~~f"' .t w:ea. `'~"k'~63F!~y"~~''~.7'' '~",°7gy~. Fj:"1"1nr.,y..i- i .g,, ro •;i?r .s ::v rye... Wr~~..ay~
P tr ' Ninute#
August 21;'1964
psgs g
and nei4hb6rhoo4 service uses. We felt that location
would be suitable fora park although we do feel some
type of fence would'be necessary along Old, North Road.
He stated he feels he has 'come up with the best land
use plan for this tract and would ask Commission for
their approval.
On questions from Commissionors Juren'a'nd Sidor
coneerhinq the proposed zero lot lint housing,
Mr. Watkins stated he did discuss putting SF-7 where
the zero lot lines are proposed and his client seemed
favorable,
Thooss Eaves, 25 3 free Lane# stated 'he has a peti-
tion,withTe si904tures from resident= 'in opposition. to
this acegisest, 1 a .ur►der#tood it would be a ~ngle f.aaily,
sF»l0 ea, H*. gtoti4 there is"a aejor. traffic problea
at thent~i;seo'i'on of Highway 3$0 and 'Old ;North Road.
He stated the rgport indice~too there is no drainage,
pioblimi, however, the, slope run-Off is toward the *Xist-
ing hou'sinq development. He further statod.the overall
proleCt 'i* '44er 4 bores of oo*"rdial' `'development which
is against the grain of that neighborhood.
Chairman LaForte left the meeting.
Saga hosson 2516 freedom 4ane, stated the traffic
consideration on Highway 360 'is a terrible situation.
He stated another goncern`is the children in the area
who want to go to the store or to the park and having to
travel on Old North Rood. He stated he feels the pro-
posed development, if`allowed, would make the value of
his investments go down. He stated they have had sev-
eral negative factors in the neighborhood and he doesn't
want any more.
John;Rogers 2524 Freedom Lane, stated`he'would like the
Com'xissio,n to poll the audience and see just how many
are in opposition to the.r6quest, He stated he VodA
also like the Commission to poll 'the traffic engineer, to
see how many accidents occur at°*the previously mentioned
intersection each,m6nth. ke 'further stated 2 acres out
of 1$'is a large area`as proposed fora park, but it's
the other area than is the major concern.
7771
ET 7 77
,4 Nlnutss
ARiiust 22, 1981
Pigs 10
John Bigaris, 2765 Mill Pond Road, stated he was opposed
'.u the increase of traffic.
Diok'$wigger, 2736 Mill Pond Road, stated he can't see
anyone benefits from this proposal except the devel-
oper, He stated the park would be desirable, however,
in on area such as this, he stated he would not ,ail;low
his children to 'go there as the traffic on Old North
'Road is too heavy. He stated as far as the people who
live within 200 feet of the proposed property, there is
only"one Fox A asoobs house that is occupied and he
didn't know anything about the proposal.
Lawrence Kelly, 2608 Smo rson, stated he has livid at the
iptersnotion of Xmrson and Qld ;North,:rood. for If years
and has boon co* ng before "the Ctas*4446A for 11 years
for this very dodo, He stated the 'area ahd;the„streets
are .mad* for an SY-10 area. Hestated he had taiked to
and was quoting Steve brinkman, Director of Parks 'and
Recreation, who 'had told him the city does not want the
is►nd for a;pairk and would,pr4bab'ly sell it, and topsider
buying land for a parrk elsewhere. He 'hurt or' stated a
two acre park in Denton is useless and would not'let his
children go there.
Ms. Spivey stated she was riot able to reach the Director
of-Parks and Recreation, however, at Development:Review
Committee meetings, parks did not seem faVOrable'toward
a park in this area. She stated this site is located in
a low intensity 'area. And,, aooordi'ng to the Denton De-
veiopment Guide, low intensity areas represent the
city's prime housing'areas'and should emphasize resi-
dential use. She stated approximately one half of the
proposed .development is,r*served:'.for residential- use.
Low inters"ty areas shouid'`oyrrespond'to an overall
gross density of 4.7 y7its per acre. The intensity of
f`, a proposed development is 4.9 ''its per acre which is
slightly Over the standard for the entire areatt however,
this area is not over the standard based on existing
land use or existing zoning.
She further stated the Denton'~Develop*ont ouide also
encourages 'a diversity ofhousing types in,all sectors
of the city. The proposed zero.lot line and condo-
cluster areas would serve to diversify housing types in
this section of the city: The zero lot line and park
sections of the proposed development are suitable
r ~ YS i;l Y. ~);w Nil. a
1
Syr+, 3 "['1 .T `NRC mr4!.,'+Y 4?4 mi3F{dr,i,:' tee.. « "7r~k^"f 77777r r .r` ' t
oY 5
L
. T 14tnU, tes
t 22 104,
page Us t
buffors between the existing single family (SP-10)
section to the north and the higher intensity office-
retail uses of this proposal. The proppoosed park site
will also serve to buffer the residential uses in this
proposal from the multiofamil units to the west of ld
North Road. She stated interim policy issue number 78
reegmmends'that concentrations of 'office/retail land use
in ;ow intensity area$ be limited to four acres.
The proposed development contains 7.9 acres of office-
retail land use, approximately twice the area'recom-
mended in interim policy issue.namber 78. She stated
st+'f is looking to the Commission for direction in this
issue as this proposal was submitted for consideration
before, staff was instructed to use the proposed revi-
siO04,64 the Denton Oevelopswnt Ouidco Xf the Coo-
mission i's inclined to approve this rsquest, staff would
reoo mend planned development conditions.
qn.question from Mr. Si tlo xr. Clark stated the current
esitensi.on of trop 288 Norr,,h. does not plan to connect to
;Mingo; Road, The current hiEghWaiX ln; ~14e not „allow for
off>ramps which ar,e extremely ax nsive and hard to
design. Loop 288 will go over Mingo Road.
On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Clark stated the
actual property is not in the flood plain.
Mrs Watkins thanked everyone for comments. He stated he
realiged the current zoning is SF-10, howeverr, given tine
pphysical characteristics of the land, who would want to
buy an SE'-10 home whose backyard backed up to Highway
380. He stated the proposed park idea was not d smoke
screen, they had genuinally planned a park there and'had
no idea that the parks department intended to resale the
property.
Mr. Sidor commented he sees a need-for a different con-
cept on the zero lot lines and condo-cluster housing.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
"Mr. Claiborne comMented the neighborhood made a,comment
that a neighborhood ser~vide is not the best use of land
at, this po nt. He stated our current Development Guide
expounds on.ths node And this is not conducive to the
node situation. He stated one point in favor is the
ecess to Ningo Road ;which ,he feels is the main posi-
ive 'fact. plus the o f' ice/warehousinq. lie stated he
wonders 'hat else could be done with the land next to
380.
r
Y Y r^,rya!Fj•.. ~aRl` 'xT1kY4'j'P H^w*TYR9!F•!'j , °~~"~ya . r n
~ a ~NiG~►uleos
1►t~ust 2o' 1186
Vale 12
"re 3uron'commented he doesn't feel this proposal is
sensitive to the needs of the neighborhood.
Mre Juron made a Motion to deny Z-1687. seconded by Ms.
Cole and unanimously carried (5.0).
De Z-1688# This is the petition of W, H,,Smith requesting
a o ange in Wing from agricultural (A) to the planned
developm*nt (PD) classification on a 52.9 sore parcel
located at the southwest corner of sonnie Brae Street
and Payne Driven If approved, the planned development
(PD) will'pormit the following land usesi
6e3 acts of neighborhood service `land use
10.0 Aor*o of_ $i'ngglo ;familyy detoa h*d land use
- minlmtifiiot : 2se of 70.000 44are foot
11,6 4 of sero lot lino land use
de'his ty' bf 7.2 units per acre
10.0 Acres of multi family land use
- density of 12 units per acre
14.9 acres of multi-fandly land use
d'o' naity of 22 units per acre
Mel-, Spivey, stated there were 7 roply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of subject propertyt
zero were `returned.
Larry Frank stated he is representing Mr, Wo H. Smith.
He dtated he was at the planning and Commission meeting
approximately one month ago for this some ;proposal and
ho, has worked, with the ne'ighbbrhood in regard to the
traffic And stated eventually the road that runs through
the park w ll be four lanes; gon,hie Brae will also be
four' ls`tlHe stated they have scaled down the density
wind; ehow*4 ; revisions of the'• pl0;n. He Cstated there is an
8" end 10" ;sewer' line stubbed out to, 'the 'property and he
is prepared; to make a-conilderable,'amount`of improve-
mentse He further stated they hope to develop'tthe
property . h , view of Texas 'Instruments coaxing into
Denton, He.stated,they realize they can not sell beer
and wine as the, neighborhood service area is across the
street from a church.
Mre Claiborne commended Mr. Frank on all the foot work
and work done with the neighborhood.
~yI~P ~ ❑ M1'9 .M,° YSM. ~i,Ir~aL 'Y":Sv i VA'#1'.M1t MI'9r V .O 't. ltt~l~n~~'~f~Y -u.:N``i, !,1'•' 1,~"+-'".i
R 9'°9 r t l } M !i 1 1 111
PLAigllNq , 11IMp Gwirllti~ON
RECOMW"IT I ON TO ' CITY C'OM I L
TO: Denton City Council
Case No.: 2-1688 Nestin4 Dater! ootobOt 2, 1964
ONNERAL I NFORMJ1T I ON
i
I
Applicant: 100H, Smith
POO.Boit 2753
Denton TX 76701
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: A 04st i'a sonAllp lro* th11 agri-
aulttii`p#1 (l~} ols's'Miti;a#tion tp the
plaaaed develop~ee~t cPb} alassi i-
cstion. If appproved. the PD will
permit the toliovinq <'uses:
1. NxighbprhOtid retvioe• on
acres bugiriaing at the southwet
corner 'of PAYA* Drive and Bonnie
Brae street
2. Kulti"tsmily op 14,9 acres (maxi-
nits per acre)
SUN det4sity;22"'U
located immediately vest and
south "of the aboVs` referenced
neighborhood service area
3. Zero lot line - on 84 lots begin-
ning adjacent and south of Payne
Driveo approxis:ately.1100 feet
vest of Bonnie Brae street
4. Single. fanny (BY-7) - On 49 lots
beginnin' adjacent and south of
Payne Dr vi and immediately west
of the above referenced :eio lot
line land use
6. Multi-family on io acres (maximum
density of 12 up~ts per acre)
located on the southtide `of
Payne Drive approximately 600
feet West of Bonnie Brae Street
a a t its a , -'l i f i' . ,/r . r r F•1. !f
(Case N 2-1464)
Palo TOO
GENERAL INFORMATION (COAtiAUed)
Location and Six*: A 929 acre parcel located at the
southwst corner Of bonnie brae and
Payne Dr iva
Existing Land Use; Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - ChUroh, single family house.
vacant; A
South - Single family residential.
vaaagt3 A
-East - North Lakes Part; A
INrt - Vacant= A
Denton' Development t}uide: Area is designated as low intensity.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: Drainage Information is coveted 'in
the ;4tta0hed 04korandum from Jerry
Clark. City Esn4ineer$
Tranilportation: xranspor'#ii`on ii4"i are oovefed; in
the atteahed ssisorandus from Kodrosh
Olyais City Transportation Engineer.
Utilities: Significant off site Utility Amprove
rants'vilA be required to eerve this
deveiopA nt. hater lines must also
be provided along interior streets of
the tl~relo~a:nt. alight indh sower
liAst must alno be built 11649
interior stree'tis. 1llectrib +iecvic•
viii be rovidee; Utility Department
rOcc*se;a s, that ;aetviae be
On 41000A eY660t ti►here lOddinq
head'
rtou'irements r adete an over
Brie. 'ads, talephohe and cable T.V.
services 'ean be `provided.
ANALYSIS
The follovinq analysis W%i''prepared for the Planning and koninq
Commission meeting of July ZS. 1904.
'i' w{. e ° i N.'• Y 1.(C Li IN i,
D
` y P&:, x P ~'+T"ts,:'rz [-m'a~yt+~s pRr~n i"P,r^,:m M1, l,gA4 acs y
ANALYSIS (Continued)
l~00 `taot :id, laaaye .a, loM ipteq* tl+. argot Accord.
iqd ;,t~ the;anlrri~te`p 1DeVSlO Moo ~ ids.` X1000 or44!_ A "kesent our
i~ri °ty 'hocusi . 1ire~lA in a` Ooid; 4MpAofiiftN 616t Al 1000.
yurtbersioro, ' bise areas are pla040d'to Correspond to an overall
I groo$ density roltOy'of 4.7 units per acre and overall intensity
policy measured at 75 trips per day per gross acre.
Diversified lana.use is enCOUraged, but ooncentration is diecuur-
aped. siali scattered sites of apartftents (usually less than
200 units, but no 1%0r4 than 500 units),aeighborhood coMmorcial,
office, tc, are permitted as long as:
1) strict site gin "dontrol i• 'saintain0d within on• block of
existing low 4sAoiiy residential areas.
2) Ttaf fie piagai'no ;i)00tes acoess by collector street or
larder and not through local low density streets. -
3) The overall density/intensity standard to not violated.
4) Sufficient green space, zscreational f.{aeiiities, and diver-
f sity of parks are provided.
5) Input into planning by neighborhooi or village co,snc.ils is
provided.
Strict site plan ,control cad be maintained on this tract because
it is kr Olannod development. The proposed neighborhood service
area and Musl,ti-family areas are accessed by collector streets or
larger rather than local low density streets, While the devel-
opsr is not proposing any green appace or parks, North Lakes Park
ig located immediately east of this development and will help to
MMet the"t need., mile it is not kno M if neighborhood associa-
tion,s input was sought, staff hot board from several neighbors
who were consulted on on individual basis.
While tAe Above f##toto a,Ke ooatsidered tevorysbl,o to this d`evelop-
xeewt, s has strAn'd re'eervatiblis coheeroipq this proposal.
It is toAt that the pFtopo'iea, arovi►' of neighborhood service and.
ipIti~ atily are is too 06 ~ bib'Centr4tioA of these uses for
this a)~ea. Of 5,2 .3 so'r'e otopose~l. 'the 21.3 acre multi-
family section cowprises almost ane ialf 0f the 'total area, The
total number of Multi-family units to be developed, 525, exceeds
the 500 unit limit established by the Development Guide for a
low intensity area.
`Yew N. Y-li6e) q
Pete Pont
1
asau.Yaia (contIU004)
Tb• of owlno = a."Ollsis pr•p red toil the r',' O i44 izd ` Hopi f►sr
Cow,i~ ;ev oai'Meeti p: of AiIlrust 22, ll, 41 "O l , ar•wsOt one, base
~toniA Go issibn it its duly 2a,
o itttit l; by viii f~1r1'ndin¢ And
i04 jisetinq. -the developer hail submitted a now Visa in an
attempt to address1004I of the oriticisns of the earlier p1*n.
The Originally 806mitted plan bud awlti~-tautly land use on 21,3
Act S (m4XiiUrA'4hAsity of 25 units per act$) with a total of 532
units. The 0ew'g164 has 14.9 acres of Multi-xMaily nand use
(IAaxinust density of 22 units pet bate) And to acres of
"Multi-family land use (maxis a density of 12 units per acre)
with :0 total of 447 units, rh*.aew unit total complies
with the aur'reA l?evelopaAe~at quids limits of 500 apartaent units
in ,a, si ql blvl(F,t:{► . i4 a low iate>isit~r area; however, it is not
bo"WO, with'; tho' 00wrlop"At auidu t*vieion 'i'nterim polio* 7A
04100 liiits opertuent units in a sinpie 'b1ust•r in a low`into, n
sitY, area to Zoo units.
The original p1awA cal ed io~c Q.3 acrals of aeia400"1bood ,service
land use at the southwe t garner of soriniO hra•:sud p+Yne 4rive.
ae#ql l>d>;hood service
7Plie-tout ent Orb" 6Ml' cohtui'gat 6, 3 acres or
at the "ssse looaition. Interim polil ispui 7p states that con-
aentrations of office/retail in low 'St city at#*$ " limited
to 4 acr*s. The petitioner Wish*$ to point out'that'further
reductions will be made in the size of the aeighborhood.sorvice
parcel due' to the road dedication And flood control easement.
The AU1Shot _of z'erq lot ,line and single family (0-7) lots remain
the same but their arraage>Aent has changed due to a`re-alignment
of the proposed collector street in this daVelopnent. The multi-
family section of this developaeat does comply with interim
policy M6 requiring access to high density concentrations in low
intensity areas by secondary arterial or greater.
RECO1MRWAT I ON
The developer has reduced the nunbe,r Of' pro otid, *Uiti-family
units faro* ,5.32 to 447 aiiw the al aunt' off' n*i h1SO>Ghood service
bar*o'q'R fro~A S. 3 ''to C3, Acres. The i*Vi66, proposal does comply
With forcer D*Velopaent ;c)uide ifsindards; however. it does not
Comply with sev'erai of 'the policy ise in the t»ve16,064nt
quid . rovision. the Punning and Zoainq CossNission recommends
approval of 2-1688 by a vote of 5 - 2 with the following
conditions:
~h l
4!a • da "N' ii;,`r~i4'~~.5 ~ sq 3 ~ ~?'+FP i i a ~ i' r
1 tCase • hi•1d~Rl
hf* rive
R "TIOM (Continued)
1. 21'40ti Coal Sas'vics shall be Underground except for ■ayor
transmission liaei~.
2. ?hat',all re"I'Otfoho of Apiiudix b4oniao or the Cod* of
nahces applicable to sI saxle
osrdi a to 1t n fonily "SP-7" districts
h ll apply tho.s s Plan '1oai4nate4 for single-family,
"dh*-7" laud use, unless otherwise specifically stated herein.
3, That on promise consumption of alcoholic beverages and
gasoline service stations shall be expressly Prohibited in
the neighborhood service area.
11L'Mi1?IVhI~
1. Aop'ravo peritio'a With' aoaditidns
2. Approve petition `46thovt oonditions
3. Approve otition with additional conditions
4. Deity pet tiorl
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. PD Concept Plan `(Z-1698)
3. PD Concept Plan (Z-1681)
4. memo front,Jerry Clark and Koorosh Olysi
5, Reply form totals
6. Property Owner Liar
7. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meetings of July
25. 1964* and August 22, 1984 and September 12, 1984
. e
r
1 ti
11:1104 OA'A,rN I W)HAt 4. 911b1 I~ a9gICULI'U/~l iOfK
JH! s t 7 ONE {I J04 0 WR14Nt flit. ONaR'Ilrr lln tO ~K'.'~K L! '
.14*4 0,
n
wa ,'Z
1.0
♦1 ,r Y f IY 11.
! r ' / I 1♦ ~ 11 / ~ SON
< h r > w' slpA4
'u f 1. 1. Y f / ♦,1
-7L- 1 ' j wl~n ,rJ«yv I , •Jr ;!..-r 1'tf a, i. f,c
t,, r
t t
`eJ 7 r 1 1 , r0 Y1~--ter' )l _ +1L}„IA,.
"it
• 'i1 r I •A 0 t ' ~ II LY~tJ.<I •a7 1
i ,
Irv
\`,1 II ~ t♦ I 1 .a I ~ I ~1 __.L.y-~--- I !}I~ III
f 11 r I 1 Jr rY 1 I ..,l,
J 1
L• \ ....O lfMawQw tiC' a<I l f
1' I I • r/J I.~ I OI OCR ira
.I i t. ee j ;ri 1 Muhl ,.r,iMl I'
1GAGf Y'r ie6' ,.A ty .nl < ~ A0 ~ .~-L+ .
1
L
vPlrr~~I PAI,~~n11 I IM«~At 1 LAH\'. I AtrM r: 111 Irnr Ar. 1MY N
'1 I I rrtrlr Liar h Nm t' Ilw.lr/~:,
I r• 11 I
} ~ 1 t
/
.f ! ~`r ~~•-'_lMifi_ r-!/111JNt'.i.lti.tlTE
ITT
rAN aArlMhMl 1 "a ly .ai
! I A OI ? . 1 ~ h S ~ ~ t ~ L ` ~I: I1 0 3 1
w
,
vr~
1 III'n It
Zl)
I p
11W^1t1111 . I w I 1MH I Ir
I.~r.. I VL1A YIN
rill '
Af AEI, 1. Irlll ,
µm R& .CV 4„c .
. k 1 A
IMIMPIF
' :
rX" mr ocPAL / OWw raw not / ram w (a?) *6*000
ME'MORAND UM
TOt Denise Spivey, Development tteview'Plannet
i'AAM: Jerry Claris, City `Engineer
DATE: July 17, 1944
SK: Z-02681
Streets and drainage are a major concern in this tract#
A. Streets:
1) emkift is Brae is a major arterial needing 120'
rijiht-of-way
2) Payte'Drive is a secondary major arterial needing $0'
rigbt-of-way based on divided road now.
Both l & 2 need to be perimeter street paved 17'
minimum + 7' of City participation in thickness
1" City participation
3) The thorou;hfate map shows two col,littor streets. The
first 1500 in from Bonnie Brae which might match the
middle street west of the multi-family if adjusted*
The other street would seem to fall 200'-300' south of
ibis, tract. Sbould it be adjusted up to seat the
ivide between two major properties?
4) Maximum of two drives will be allowed for neighborhood
services ons. on Bonnie brae and one on Paytia.
3) All multi-family access will be off internal street
syst"O
8. Drainage:
All th tract drains to 'the" western soil. conversation des
" lake". All 'drainage can be parsed tbrougb if tbs
total improvements ark 'made for ;thee -Culverts crossing on
Donato Scoo to tb 1a Ca, e d 'dp. 0 01400 t4 a min ®>z
F r ^1 a 51
dar id 'tot t~+Nl,04-01e of a led ` foe toi* sA►tilq a•
M1a' 0 ~Ceotser IS ea tat 1'leN1il~laii~" +~~t M11 o~
1►i1~ir'atid foth0v isprov"Onts to 000 it us" 614.
All 1 MA► wp revisions 444 smoedmest "Utews4rs a o
epoliaOte to this area*
C. wat.r:
A set of plos has boot designed for tbo future 16" Payne
Drive waterline. Those could be used vitb this development
if okayed by the Utility Deportmento
sty aeor Traf fit 9iater
*'8241
wood
CITY COUNCIL
s-use
IN „ FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UND_,.. ECCID_U
Sill Nariwy None Received
~ 17 VAnddxbil.C CT.'
DOnton, 'TX'76202
j
l
0 00-1 OWN W
l
~AO
14
-A A
20
i/olyw
6A i/Aj hi-
I
f t
1 `'i ~ t5 r~l Ss..',~ n j., ; ~Ffr „
aRiT
1 4 L Nty111tes .
Jttlr t5, 104
page g
.±bt'• oG+144q
X t~Nivef stet~►td b~04e twos lot - s t
4101, orate ntensl;ty +►r~►e f►hd; tbet',8 ' o 6 tua'iy, .for
si< ilGt #ita, plaq Coricrol w#;1:h sttra gA.t• eiral .teii
zo 'in t, It is felt t,h`at' 6bh e;aerex 'fit ei1 00 Could
bf,(harMfol to existing re4ldea~gxf AlloOtnt this use
could Solt a trend of encroach ''I on the eListfi ' single
eilyy housing. i`n thi's area,o h,is area is an older
nb ghboirhood 6ub°j.eG,t to, tho' forces , a£ oh. nga. She
stated the:DenL'op' Develop,m6At GU de,speoMcaliy; states
too following: 4h review'of zoniog,;subdivisioh,.city
br4d at Capital.lwprovament Pro roe planning and ntber
si;alar dsC si,q ri pGiafis,► priority will be, liven 'to older
e ~ d i'~Abo r oads to insure and Ptt,, t e nei A, prhood
an public "oq 66,0461- that. Z'onit:~~ s ability,`s'~ri12,e ia-
ta ued~ '#ubdi;visios.;ahd 'hau i;a x4velopwHt'n ti1iti 1I be
'04, 00' #4+;, "and pu~.i,ic fOt" br~AI'hi ve a priority to
ah se',a,rens.aver pewlye,xpandin areas." She stated
sta`Ef recommends denial of Z-160.
Ms,Aay stated the surrounding area is zoned office and
exited, she,aoesn't see it would be encroaching on the
existing single family.
Mr. LIaiooeae asked Ms. Gay if they had considered PD
zoning. She said no as they felt general retail zoning
was Nmpat`ible with the flower shop across the street.
Mr. Juxen commented that Mr. Riney had been in business
for a number of years and that in itself would form some
sort of trust.
Mr. Juren made a Motion to approve 2-1680, 3eeonded by
Mr. Sidor and carried S-1. (Hr. Claiborne voted no.)
1i. r. 6 . 'phis is thb petition of W. H. Sai'th reques•ting
a sel.R'n zoning f,roa agriculturaI (A) to the~plannod
devei'bpNia t (P13) clasaifica'tion aq a 52:982 acre parcel
begixn ng at the`southwest corner14f Payne Drive,
(kiiW's-6r Drive)and 8'dhnie Brae :Street,,. 'the tract has
approkinately 200,95, foet of frontage -el`ohg the o'utt►
side'`of P4kn4 Drive °and approxi;4 'ely1004S, toot of
gr6itijo along•the west side of llohnie'Brae Street.
it appproved, the planned developoe'nt (PD) will permit
the following'land uses:
X
r c a
S
Mi>aute:
Ju1y 25, i984
Page 9
Neighborhood services - on 80 acres
beginning at the southwest ,orner of Payne Drive
and Bonnie Bran Street
Multi•family - on 21`,~ acres'(at 2S `units per acre)
located;immediateiy west a►,d south of the above
referenced neighborhood services area
Zero l9t line - on 40 lots
beginning adjacent and south of Payne Drive
approxiattely 1,100 feet west of Bonnie Brae Street
Single family (SP47) - on 59 lots
begintii'ng adjacent and south of Payne Drive and
immediately west of the above referenced zero lot
line land use
Ms. Spivey stated there were 7 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of the subject property;
zero were returned.
Mr. Larry Prank stated he was representing the property
owner and he has owned it for some time and would like
to develop as proposed. He stated all the technical
problems have been worked out on the water and sewer,
He stated they are prepared to `work with 'staff and to
move the proposed street to connect to Thunderbird,
Payne Drive and Bonnie Brae Street will be widened to a
great extent and this will be the only neighborhood
service in this area.
Paul Haygood, pastor of 'Life Tabernacle, stated he owns
10 acres 'north 'of the proposed and since a recent fire
had destroyed teeir church building at 501 N. Wood, they
are now holding services at the roperty on Bonnie
Brae. He stated several' newlywis and young couples
nave expressed their desires to buy affordable housing
near the'church.'`He stated there is a need for more
housing in the area.
Mr. Jim Hngelbrect stated he lives in the North Lakes
Addition to the east of the proposed, and stated' he has
ta7,ked to a number of residents An ;the area who are not
total y apposed, buLhave ezpress.ed their concerns
regarding traffic. He stated he is,cbneerned with the
neighborhood service and asked that this part of the
roposah 'be witliheld'untih the ;tr#O;ic.can move out of
the,, area more smoothly, 'He s`tatpd Ehis are# is; desig-
nated as A low density area and,statod he''does not fteil
that multi-ftaily is within those bounds and that zero
lot'lines '(6,000) square feet lots are too small.
1 d ii
VA Z' 004utoi
J11iy ;25, 1984
Pigs 10
Lynn Holt, 2520 BowliAS Green, stated she Was mainly
opposed to the neighborhood service and,said she felt it
was being built in the flood plain area,
Jim Danielson, 1504 Bowling Green, stated aesthetically
this is a. beautiful area and we don't want Windsor Drive
turned into some kind of strip,
Joe Adamson, a resident of North Lakes Addition, stated
his concern is with the improvements to Bonnie Brae,
Ms, Spiv stated this 52,.9.acre tract is Jocated in a
I intet~4warea. Accai*A,ng to the Denton Development
duide 't'h'es'e ':ares►s reprelq ottr primary housing areas
and mould-*OpO*$t to residehtial use, $he''stated these
arb&$ are 'fanned to correspbbd to an; avo'4441 gross
density. policy'o€ 4,1, units per,acre and overall
intensity policy nesud at ,25, tips 'per "d per gross
acre. S, a stated t b nt6n", Dove 1opoo du de endour
aaes'i ivers'ified° land use, tint concentration is di'seour-
eged, She ~)tated small scattered sites of. apartments
(usually ie s than 200 uni'ts, -but no more than 500
units), nei nborhood commercial", office, etc„ are
permittod with certain conditions, She stated of the
2.3 acre proposal, the 21.3 acre multi-fawily;secti'on
comprises almost one half of the total area. Sho stated
the total number of multi-family units to be developed,
5x5,-exceeds the 500 unit limit established by the Do-
velopmeent Guide for a low intensity area therefore
,
staff recommends denial of ..1681. Staff would recom-
mend approval of this proposal if the concentrations of
multi-family and neighborhood service were reduced.
Mr. Frank stated he would be glad to work with staff in
cuttingg down the number of units and density. Possibly
take l0 acres of the 23`.3 acres near the zero lot line
housing, He stated they do have $1000000 off-site sewer
improvements.
OKs. Cole asked if he could not cluster the zero lot line
houses and have one street of zero lot'line housing
instead of two.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
,f
a +rt'p ..,.r~iFC , t' a'~"~~ 9 rfi71+~ a nn
5 y H t5-• 6 J f,~~l r,'..1 t .s , i' i' 7`
f! Z Ni"aute'f
July 25, 1984
t Page 'II
Chairman LaPorte stated he had toyed with the idea to
table the request. Out decided to vote against the
r_ petition.
Mr. S'.idor stated he thought there is a need for a
neighborhood service in the area near the park, but
stated he feels that 8.3 acres is excessive and should
be denied,
ry Mr. Pearson stated Mr. Sidor hod summed up his feelings
exactly.
f Chatroan LaPorte wade a motion to deny Z•1681. Seconded
by Mr. Sidor and unanimously car'ried`(6-0).
. ; C60sida,r the request of. Me:ivin D., Herr for .
d.ance of d,. of Denton Subdivision Reguiati4its and
Land pevelopoant p,ode`prdvisions requiring the extension
of public water and sewer peri'motor street aving, and
11
adequate drainage facilities across the fron age of pro-
posed lot S. block C," Westgate `Park, `First Addition.
Mr. Ellison stated the owner and developer is requesting
a variance or waiver of fundamental subdivision develop-
ment standards. He stated this was submitted as a stand-
ard preliminary plat, (Westgate Drive) and noticed
Pladger Drive was involved in the perimeter street
paving, He stated developer does not want to pay for
erimet r street paving or water across the frontage o'f
he tract. He stated there are no problems with the
sewer but water is a'problem. He stated the subject
sit& Is .964 acres in size and is locatd at the
southwest corner of Fladger Drive and Westgate Drive
(210 'feet of Fladger Drive frontage and 200 feet of
Westgate Drive frontage)., There is a lot of interest in
developing in this area and there is a need for the ex-
tension of water and for curb and gutter. The Engineer-
ing D'epartMerpt and the Development Review Committee are
recosuaendI daAiai of the drainage and perimeter street
paving vaiiince-request. He stated this is a typ ical
staff response to such regyestis with the. ratio,itale being
that 'street ioproveoants vtaivedat 'the 'time of 'the de-
velopiant,can only be done through, payingassessoent
programs or cost to the'generai public through,bond
issues and similar typs'programs.
e,
t rq`Xy'G !`7N, r'~:'
6
i►094" 11 1961
Piq• lZ
Mre Juren co"on,ied' he doesn't feel this 'proposal is
sensitive to the needs of the neighborhood.
Hr. Juren made a motion to denyy' Z-1681. Seconded by Me. '
Cole and unanimously carried 3-0).
D. ~ This is the.petitioh of We H. Smith requesting
a c ange in sorting from agricultural `(A) to the planned
dev414p"ht (PW classification on 4`02.9 afire parcel
located at the southwest corner of Bonnie Brae Street
and pxXne'Drive. if appproved, the planned development
(PD) will permit the following land' uses:
6*3 *Oros of n_eighbolrhoip4'eerviae land use
10.0 a4t*0 of single fik*ily,detached land use
* Miii4AUA. lot sise, of 7,000 090ers feet
11.6 oot 8 of Zero lot line land use
- den*lty of 7.2 units per acre
10.0 acres of multi~IN*ily land use
density.of 12 units or acre
14 *0 *ores of"multi familY , land us*
density of 22 units pet acre
Ms. Spivey stated there were 7 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of subject propertyl
zero were returned.
Larry Frank'stated he is representVng Hr. WON. Smith$
He stated he was at the Planning and Commission` meeting
approximate11 ly one month ago for this same 'proposal and
he has worked with the neighborhood in regard to the
traffic and stated eventually the road that runs through
the park will be four lanest Bonnie Brae will also be
four lanes. He stated they have scaled down the, density
and showed revisions of the plan. He stated there is an
8" and 10," sewer line stubbed out to the property and he
is prepared to make 'a considerable amount of improve-
oonts. He further stated they ;hope to develop the
property in view o Texas Inatrusents coming into
Denton. He stated they realise they can not sell beer
and wine as the neighborhood service area'is across the
street from a church.
Mr. Claiborne cosmaended Mr,. Frank on all the foot work
and work done with the neighborhood.
1
1
te"+'rc~r 7vr,.,..r.,d„ . ~.is...s R kh ;L zw^zr,. ti a},.'A-1r ~'ff rrna+,i'Y!t qTo..rgx
it 23. 1904
page 13
t'
t
Jim Sngelbrecht, 2305 N. Lakes Trail, commended Mro
Frank and Mr. Smith for the personal meetings with the
neighborhood. He stated he still has some problem with
the proposed zero lot, lines facing the SF»7 area and
stated speaking on behalf of the neighborhood* they do
not feel a necessity for a neighborhood service in this
area.
Mr, Lynn Holt, 2530 Bowling Green, stated if he is
allowed to develop apartments in this area# he feels it
will allow more developpment of apartments in the area.
He stated he' feels 14.9 acres of multi-family 'should be
cut from 22 units to 15, units
t1. dim Danielson, 2$44 Sow IIng Qr"pp stated the Commission
. ie bpfng sksd to.,alter the soning 660 agricultural to
r„ ongx~ apartnNhts'and businasees~ He stated it would be
. ' ape~ing a wedge ,for a,; otsmf+ae'roi.a.l'seator up 'dnd; down
y Bonnie 9Kb whioh' would necesaiitits turning Bo" nnie 'Brae
into a six `lane highway. He stated the area does not
4 need another neighborhood service, which would be open-
ing the whole west side of, the park up to apartments and
commercial type,'developmoht.
Ms, Spivey stated this 5249 sore tract is located in a
loa intensity area. According'to the Denton Development
Quidethese;aroas represent our primary housing areas
and should emphasize residential use. She stated these
areas are planned to correspond to an overall gross
density policy of 4.7 units per acre and overall inten-
sity policy measured at 75 trips per day per gross
acre. She stated diversified land use is encouraged,
but concentration is discouraged, Small scattered sites
of apartments, neighborhood commercial, and office, are
permitted as long as several conditions Ire mets She
stated strict site plan control can be maintained on
this tract because it is a,planned development. She
stated staff has strong reservations concerning this
pro osal it is felt t.hot the proposed amount of neigh-
bdrtood service and multi-family area is 'too great a
concentration of 'these uses for this area.
She stated this rb'quest was denied by the Planning and
zoning co"ission'at'its July 25,;1984 meeting. The
developer, has submitted a new plan in an attempt; to
address some of the criticisms* of the ealier plan. She
F,
F`i°$. r "?"~f°"~y. a~.d4.... ~ 4M a. `.,°~e~~, %"ST,"4`, °^?R'.Ir ~'?.'~.:"j~+R+}}^:'s'.°i ~ rF~A,~~ s•yF°R<'~'+"t` jr1.A'
T ''f I ( f ~ ~ 1
~ N~lnute~
A~1♦.t 72`. '1
x Page l`
stated the developer has reduced the number of proposed
multtrfamiI units from 532 to 447 and the amount of
net hb'cfhog service acreage from 8.3 to:6.3 acres. She
armed the revis0d proposal toes cursply with current be-
Wel,ppn~ent Guido st0. Ardst however, it does not comply
with several of the 'interim "policy issues in the pro-
sod Developaent`Guido revision. She stated stuff is
lookingg to CAmais4ion for direction on this cases hoar-
evert if Commissign'is inclined to approve this requests
staff recomaOnds Ithlat conditions be applied.
Mr. J'uren stated 'Stinnie Brae is on the major'thorough-
fare plan and requests a 120''of right-of-way6
on tteation'ftoa Mr. Si'doio,fir. Olyai stated Payne or
r Windsor Drive is a second major arterial.
Mr, 9idor eohtod the current Development.:Guide
provides for X00 to $00, units and they were proposing
532. He has.reduced this number''of 447 and he feels the
commission can not penalize this developer as he has
complied with the Commission's previous requests*
qtr. Frank st4ated the `SF.-7 area could be changed so that
it would not face"the;tero"lot line housing. He stated
they are not requesting an:E-z Chek or a convenience
st6re but for a prnfessianal servicep'sueh as a doctor,
sawyer or accountants offices, He stared when trying to
plan foe the areas'all they had was the current Develop-
ment Guide policies to work with and had tried to work
with staff. He stated they do want to work with the
residents, that he was born and raised in 'Denton and is
not after a fast buck as he does plan to stay in Denton.
He further stated he could come down to a reasonable
figure between 15 and 22'units# maybe 18, if that would
be acceptable.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Sidor.eipressed his feelinga.concerning the Denton
ikvelopslent' 11 Guide, to see that the city, is developing in
a proper emanner.. tie stated this is a guide, however, a
lot of land'de,vllopt~ertt is on a first come first serve
r basis. He state& the Commission can't expect. the de-
11
per to go in the hole. He further stated he is not
velo
too concerned about a neighborhood service in this area.
r
r
W S R 1 ; . 1 M a:1 .J p r Yi, It tR WY ~!"scr Mir.' a}T :'i~ r T~ 8 8 Miqutea•
A446t; 22, i084
~L Page -15
Mr. Claiborne made a motion to approve 2-1688 with the
following conditions:
1) Electrical service shall be underground except for
major transmission lines.
2) The multi,-family, neighborhood service, and zero lot
line sections of this`devtlopmont must have specific
site plan approval,
3) That the 14.9 acres be reduced to 18 units per acre
and limited to two stories in height.
Motion failed for lack of second.
Mr. Sidor made a ;motion t'o a ~r0" Z-1688 with the
conditions as suogested 6y it*tf 'ilncludeed. in the
Planning and Zoning Co"ission packet, with the
exclusion of condition`nuaaber 3 made previously by
Mr. Claiborne.
Motion failed for lack of,second.
Mr. Juren made a motion to deny Z-1688. Seconded by Mr.
Escue.
Mr.'Sidor commented he doesnOt understand the basis for
denial. He stated the developer has done and tried to
meet all of the conditions required by the Commission.
Mr4 auren stated the major reasons for denial are
because there is too much acreage for the neighborhood
service section and the zero lot line houses are facing
the SF-7 urea.
Vote was calledc Aye - Mr. Esoue and Mr. Juren; Nay:
Mr. Claiborne, Ms. Cole and Mr.'Sidor. Motion failed
3-2.
i
'Mr. Sidor made a'motion to table 2-1688 and be placed on
the next planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
September 120 1984* Seconded by Ms. Cole and
unan-imously carried-(5-0).
i I
'-`17 ~ > ir'I ° sr rY €1 .1,'4 ros4=, k, l a '.~i,l 1 !.j r 1~ ~ .v J'"1 t(.
r 71v Yr ✓rv"r Y`xr L\F .t: y~, 47 ~'y ,k a , r ! j .A.~..r, . . P
r r ryy,jwo
rti
4 Septeob*r 12, 1984
pal* 1`t
lie `atata¢ proper tongs is in place and'plans for public
improvements (draiAApe''ptiaarily) are adequat He
further stated City;Cou.Acil approved a preliminary replat
and site, pian'at it' ,,MeetiiiS of August 7' 1Q8,4 as well as
the re»oppeairig sit p )Oy'Creek a$ a pi~bl,'ic road in conjunc-
tion with the a ppr'o've'q, aNandMent to a planned development
(Pb) affecting diinllilp' 11.4 ila stated there has been
some concern about;Piaey Creek Boulevard, ° He stated the
engineers ware under the impression the City Council
approved a 30 foot'deditated right-of-way. .
Mr, Clark stated Ms. Storer wanted the City to Maintain a
100. foot rignt•of -way and then the 'street woyld narrow
down to a $1 foot 'private street running through nor
developwent.
on question f Zion Mr, t; alone, dlr. Ellison stated no, the
city does not want an additional 50 foot right-of-way
totaling a 100 foot right-of-way.
Mr. Pearson stated `all we are doing is approving what
city, I already approved. He asked what is the
typical street wi4th,
Mr. Ellison stated 31 to 34 feet.
Ar, Greg Edwards stated he is present if there are any
questions and stated Fields, Edwards & Associates has
submitted 2 plats showing a 40 foot easement which is
what he understood City Concil approved. He stated they
have met all of'the technical requirements,
on question from Mr. 5idor,`Mr. Edwards stated yes he is
representing Henry S. `Miller and ;its. Storer, He stated
what Henry S. Muller is proposing, is not what Ms. Storer
wants.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Escue made a motion to 40prove, the fi'hal replat
of 'Township 1,10 Phese 11 (San`;'Jacihto Plaza Shopping
Center). Seconded by Mr, JufshI and carried 4.2.
(for. LaPorte and Ms. Cole voted'no.)
V. Considerations
AMake a retoa~rendation to ,the, City';'aifilCil on the retquest
~4 of W, No Smith for a cb{{;~~inge tbning (roll agricultural
Q~4110 (A) to the planned deve,iop.mont (PD) classification on a
52.9 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of
Bonnie 'Brae Street and Payne Drive (Z+1688).
;}i Jhkrs, oYh.%. !%F .f'e'~i'dSLb ri~ v. . l~d•i ~~~rrr.,r.r~.~5
t V ° n
W _7
i'
i.
~ Yi,; ~mukas
Ssptoil'or 12. 1084
Pas♦ 15
Mr, LaPorte ;stated he' had been contacted by several of
the hole owner in the `area and he had told them z 1658
world not be d toossod as it'was not on'tho ppreligirary
agenda* lie stated at would li"e to table 'tuts request
until September 461 1984, the next planning and Zoning
Commission meeting.
Mr, Juren stated don't we need to bring this up off the
table?
Mr. Sidor ■ode p motion to remove Z•1688 from the table,
Seconded by Mr, Juren and carried 4"3. (,1r. Escue~
Ar, LaPorte and Mr. Claiborne voted no.)
Ms. Spivey stlitdd "the 'oe'titionor„agr"eed to reconsider the
peition'and hae ingo.rmed'sta(f'h,e*K'as'not reconsidered re-
ducing any o the_prdposal. -Shc stated the last public
.nearing was published, this one was not,
Mr. Juren asked if the Commission's motion was to table
until the next meeting.
rlr. Sidor answered yes no had made the Motion to table
and that it should appear on the next agenda.
Chairman Claiborne suggested the Commission consult with
the acting City Attorney, Joe Morris,
Cdr. Morris asked`'if a public hearing was held. Ile asked
if the 'public hearing was closed; if it had been 'tabled;
if there oas been a motion to remove from the table.
Chairman Claiborne stated yes to all of Mr. Morris's
questions,
Mr. Morris stated the commission can vote without having
a public hearing.
Mr. Pearson asked if they could have another public
hearing,
tdr. Morris stated' yes.
Mr. Pe'rSon made a'motion to re-open the public hearing.
Seconded`by 'Mr. LaPorte and carried d-1. (Mr. Bscue
voted'no.)
Mr. Laporte questioned the purpose of another public
hearing.
Mr. Pearson stated so that opposed could speak.
Chair declared public nearing re-opened.
t I ii
51~pt*b+~r 12, 1934
Pajs 16
ias, Spivey sto14d:.this is the $004 request that was
pprssented three weeks iAgd at a pr;evlous Pla'hAing and
Zoning`Coaoi'asio meet'in and that, h ve bean o changes
made. She stateithere ere 7 reply Woo madod to
property owners within 2G0 feet of the subject property;
4 were returned in favor and zero opposed.
Mr. Larry Frank ,etaCed i~4 .l s. repreeehting WA, Utth on
this project,, 40 at ed ' t 'here had been some opposition
last time and heva.mile concession$,over a period of time
with toe reside"rats. end: city s't'aff, and fQel the petition
as presented reveals the neeos of the devei'Qper as well
as the desires' of the hoigobdrjiouds, He stated tijeyy'nave
agreed to no gaioliho "Ta"lons or bars 'in the nei.' hbor
hood 'aervitb,area.. Ho stated rib has a list of ad scent
property owners in favor of' the petition, He stated he
etas curt trio pe`6p4sl down to 00,88 uni`t.s or acne and
will require of-site iaprovbaents to Hinkle Drive, No
stated he has,caahgod tae street design on the west end
of the proposed,
On question from Mr. P,earso;n, Mr,' frank stated yes, the
petltioq, that a'ppear.ed'"on the last agenda is the same as
the handout 'he. presented to Commission; and "yes, we have
met with the nei"ghborhood.
Mr. Lynn Hoit, stated he is representing the North Lakes
homeowners association, which was opposed last time to
the proposal, but are now in favor,
Rev, Paul Haygood,, pastor of the Life Tabernacle CEiurch,
stated he has a petition he would like read_verably as
the church's appreciation of the petitioner and would
like to go on record as stating they are 100 percent in
favor of the proposed,
Gene Gamble, stated he'is an area property owner and has
been for is years. He stated he and nis wife had decided
it wa,s time to rove oh: and develop. He stated he is not
opposed to.tne petition and as he sees, the only ;way to
get Bonnie Brae iaproVold0 1s to get more development out
there, 'He stated he wouId ''hope,tnat the Commission would
approve it as they have spent a lot of money on the
project.
Ms. Spivey, brieElr descriood the 'Proposed preYious+ly
presented and stated the developper Aas redueed'the nuAber
of proposed multi,fs#ily units Eroa 51 32 to 447 and the
amount of"neighnpthood serwiae atreagq froe8,3 to 6.3
I: aThe, rd'yised p1oj~osa does comply with previous'.
$6velopaent'duide staadaz`ds' however, it does not coiply
with several of the i'atbria"policy issues in the roposed
Development Guide revision. She stated staff is'~n a
w-'
c V 4 ..,rt n i `re`s rr 7y+ 7, 0 :rt 1 r ` r [ A .
917,
77777
V 4 x N4Aatos
461 e b
19~
r 1'2
t e
~
Page. 17
qqu+g4ry as this case was submitted before the proposed
Aevelopoont OtiWo` revision* were 'reve#led to the Public,
she Stated if the commission is inclined to approve this
request, staff recomit'ads that Conditions be applied,
Chair declared ths'public hearing closed.
Mr, Sidor commended Nr. Frank for the perserverence and
working with the neighborhood residents for their
epproviI4
it. Sidor aid*-* motion to recommend approval of 2-1688
with the following conditions
i`) Slbctriciai service shall be underground except for
major tansetssion lines.-
2) The multi-f'oily,.neigl~borhood,seryice, and zero lot
line sectib~s'"of this dove lopeeht must have specific
site plan approval.
3) Uat on`promtse Onsop`tion of ilcoholic beverages
ar►d asolia{~ service stations shall be expressly
prohibited in the naighbornood service area.
Seconded by Mr, Pearson and carried 5-2. (Mr, Claiborne
L sand- Mr. LaForte voted no.)
8. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the
I-j5W Addit on.
Mr. Ellison stated this is a 3.00 acre parcel located
adjaceut and west 'of the I-3iW service road 'south of
Airport Road. He stated the property is zoned light
industr,tl (W) and,the pr6p6sed land use is unknown
at this time, He Stated the shape of the tract sakes
planning for fire hydrant placement difficult wi'tho'ut
knowledge of exact locations of buildings. Fire hydrants
are required every 300 feet and the fire marshall has
advised the'0.w'0.6Ir.of "pi*4 to approve 'final location of
` hydrants during the building Permit stake, An aeUAtely
sited water`Nain'willhave to be ixtendeo thr6ogh the
interior of the teadt., He stated All 'problems have been
w'orked`out and Development Review Committee recommends
approval.
Ar, Bscue made a motion to recommend `approval of the `
preliminary plat of the I-35W Addition. Seconded by
Chairman Clalberae and' unanimously carried (7-0).
C. Recommend appproval of, ,the ~p~relimi'hary' plat of the
John Smith AddYtion an4 consider;re406st for waiver of
erimeter streetpavimS're0irements for a section of
Bonnie Art* Street,
R'x yE A ' ~ ry t o. i5~ 9 ~
2S~ 9 Mfr
AN OrtDh xMG: xNR~;'r. f' tlt 4~'
AS SAM A~ . 41 AN AT~'RND ~a.. ~ 00 at
~
V"t 00 , ,i p ~ , x C8 Q e , 69'.t l. AS l1/►I NAl'
THE CITY 0!
NNI p~ SB DRAS3~AN~, ` Y kjVtr D 9~ AT TU,
Y E11
PAOIC1iLAYlt.Y 0 Cmalt
!{RR IN i TO pROYID . yOA A AND IN ZONING c#,A8"I'CAI to" p1tON
At11tICULTU1tAI, ~`AA DIBTNLOT Cf+AA8$X ZCATT AND USt DBIGNATIOfi TO
PWNNI:D MO CRT 11pD" CLA881fICATION AND U&E OESXGNATION; ANq
PNOVIDING FOR AN tFYKCTIVE BATE.
THE COUNCIL Or THE CITY Of DMON, TEXAS, HERteY 04UXNS:
SECTION I.
That the zoning classification and use dosignation of tho
following described property, to-wits
All that certain tract or parcel of land'eitUaCSl to the fsanoes
Batson Survey, Abstract. No.' 43, Denton, countyY0 exaao betno the
saw 52.98 core traop ooawyed by J. . Glediih aux to M. C.
Collier on November 13, 1931, recorded in Volk% ~74, rtso 609
Deed Words of said County: and being more particularly describoa
or followst
BEGINNING at the northraat corner of said Collier 'tract in the
middle of a public road-
THENCE south 1°53' west with the middle of said road sod the east
Tina of said Batson Survey 1145.16 feet to a point in said road;
THENCE'north'87°23' west with a fence most of the way 1200.81 feet
to a fence corners
MAKE north 2°13` east with a fence 95.7 feet to a fence corner;
THENCE north 87°23' west With a fence -899.06 feet to a fence
corner;
THENCE north 2°06' east with a fence most of the way 1041.19 feet
to u point in the middle of an east-west public road,
THENCE south 87°38' eaat-with the middle of said public road
2095.96 foot to the place of beginning, containing in all 52.986
acres of land.
is here' yy changed from Agricultural "All District Classification
and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" Classification and
Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinan" of the
City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION It.
That in approving this planned development district ordinance,
the City Council hereby Approves the c rehensive site plan for
the areas designated for single-family "-7" use as shown on, the
attached cite plan and designated as Blocks A and B therein.
SECTION ILL.
That in, epproving' the' planned dovel44pwat district' ordinance,
the City Council hereby i-Otio-' the.prellrinary rite 1a sliovi
the proposed land user withi'p t eroas das14nat*4 as Clocks C' a4
D for Otero lot ' line use, Henke i' cad f for multi+familyy'"(10 acres)
use, block H for neighborhood service (6.32 acres) and blocks IF and
G for aulti-family use (14.9 arras).
prior to the issuenca of any buil4ing pererit for developsRient
of those usss listed in this 8oetioc I1I, a comprehensive site plan
shall be required to be submitted and approved as part of this
I
* ..F"-•} """y"a't'°,R~'~r~' R^' °'"~'Tt"'y' "r"°p 'z''^',%i e;.. av,t x 'T7' M,s-^, - 7777
i
ordinancs U accordance with Article 11, Appendix a-ZOaiag of the
Code of Ordineq
SEOTI4N IV.
'Chat prior to lasu nc* of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building witht the planned development district, the
following conditions shall ~e ma ti
1. Electri'oal service shall be underground except fo+; major trans-
mission lines.
2. That all regulations of Appendix I-Zoninc of the Code of Ordi-
nanoes applicable to iinglo-family '!Sr-Y1 distriato`'shall apply
to the sit• plan de#i nated for sin le-family land use,
unless otharwise spec Jically stated lersin.
3. That on preatse consumption of alcoholic bovera •o aiid gasoline
servics stations shall be expressly prohibited in the neighbor-
hood service area.
SECTION V.
That the development, of the property shall be in substantial
coaplieooo with the site plan attached hereto and made a part hereof
for all purposes.
The Zoning Hap of the . City Of Dsoton Texas, 14440d the 14th
day of January, 1969, as an Appondix to the. Cads of Ordinances of
tha City of Denton, Texas under. Ordinance No. 69.1; be and the
sage is hereby arendsd to show such change in District Ciassifica-
tion and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECTION VI.
ThAit the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds
that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the
ppurpose of proao~ing the general Welfare of the City of Denton,
Tex&a and with reasonable consideration, among other thins for
the character of the district and for, its peculiar suitability or
articular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the
guildin s, protectingg human lives, and encouraging the most
appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to Cho City of
Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECl iON VII.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect imnedi-
ately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings
having heretofore' been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and the City Council` of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due
notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1984.
• ItTCF~,7XitR'; `~tYdit
CITY OF DENTON', TEXAS
ATTESTt
CITY OF DENTON,~MUS
APORO AS 1 TO UdAL YWW i
J76 D. NAYS, AC'[IIIO CITY ATTORUY
C TY OF UENTON, TUAS
By
+t !tl . av is e'~
1
Tr"
41
• ~ • I MMM
I. ~
110
ij 2-1888 ;
i
e..., i„ ii' ~tll ,.y. V, .':1, ;•1. ,r , yvv i•~ I, as ~.~,I
l5
""177
°rt ^'y... , may, -q l t, i,'hLANIIIN4 AND ZOUX" ComissION
98COl61N MAT I ON TO TNX CITY COUNC I L
Tot Denton City Council
Cass No,: Z-1689 Xoetinq Datot October 2, 1986
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Joe Evanit
Star Rt, $*Uth
Saint Jo. TX 76265
Requested Actions than'ge iron "Abe agricultural (A)
04o 0g classification to the planned
d,~v t'opatnt (PD) zoning distr ct. If
kP'pro''0d11 tno' grinned deVelapeiitit
(PD) will porstit light iadusttial
1'ai.d uus.
:vocation and Size; A M 3 aore tWit located on the east
sid'e` of Masch' 'Jion'oh Road approxi-
Nately 583 feut south of U.S. Highway
380.
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Agricultural/ commercial/
residential; A
South - Construction company; C
Last - Vacant; A
West Single family$ light
industrial A
Denton Development Guide; Area is designated as moderate
intensity.
t
y
i
Py iii (?{;1y/f1M1^; I~. rl l N 'k'• t i liil °h i 5i ! i,Y':y i ~.~y: "S.L.,.129~iu'A;'L]i91,hi f.,.3=a!--_.:~.r_~i
yi . t f ?~n°' A„44',i"SFTe'n~;°. 41.r':~l, nwrr
777,77777. 7'y (Cat. ~ x-ray')
page Two
SPECIAL. INFORMATION
Drainages Drainage in this area goes under the
road in a box culvert between lots 1
and 2, This drAinage,system Must be
upgraded to support this development.
Transportations Perimeter street paving ordinance
will be applioable to match Branch
Road (60 feat of right-of-way 30 feet
from beater lies) o This road may be
considered for Loop 288 in the future.
Utilities: city water and sewer service Mutt be
extended to serve this tract,,, The
neae st sewer line is the tijo,Eory
Crook line, Eloctriao teiephdtte and
gag services are available to Zhe
site.
ANALYSIS
This, site, is located in *-Moderato intensity area. Existing
land uses along Match Branch Road range from ranch or estate
type housing and attractive single family, to a steel;compaUy.
commercial and small business uses. specifically. staff counted
twelve (12),residenoes and six (6) businesses along Match Branch
Road' betwtan Highway, 380 'and ,tits Chrietal Road, A significant
amount of agricultural (A) land and undeveloped property also
exists in. the area. Although a,moderate intensity designation
exist$ at ;this site, the Development`duide encourages protection
of low density residential areas within one block of potential
high intensity developments through measures normally associated
with planned development (PD) `zoning. This request is for
planned development (PD) zoning that would permit light indus-
trial land use, Future significant residential' development is
being discouraged because of the proximity of this area to the
municipal airport.
E
5i;" E; r .:T r.'. W~f i4 if .
i r 1 y .ar,l °7 'tt3: 'v`tJ'i9 e^ r~ IC,i~. ~.r
' (case .0 1-1609)
Page Three
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of this request is consistent with policies that dis-
courage residential development in the airpport area, Staff
reels that the residential development in this moderate inten-
sity area is worthy of protection. The Planning and Zoning
commission recommends approval of Z-1699 by a vote of 7 0 with
the following conditions:
1. Residential land use will be prohibited at this site.
2. No building within the development on this tract shall
exceed two (2) stories in height,
a. Buildings and parking areas must have a minimum fifty (50)
toot *'*tback from Match branch Road right-ot-way nine
adjoining the property.
4. Parking lot design must position parking lot lights away
from existing single family residence to the west.
5. The following land uses are specifically prohibited in the
planned development (PD):
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Half--tray House
Homo For Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric
Patients
Private` Utility Shop or storage Yard
Amusement, Commercial Outdoor, Drag Strip or pacing
Go-Cart Track
Drive in Theatre
Hauling or Storage Company
Tire Re-Treadi'nq or Capping
Tool or Trailer Rental
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Sand, Gravel or Barth Sales and Storage
Trailer Rental or Sales
storage and Silos of Furniture or Appliances
outside a-*U iiding
~ Extraction a,qd sale of Sand, Caliohs Stone.
'Clay or ata;"l
mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Asphalt or Concrete Hatching Plant (permanent)
II Brick -Ki1n %t Tile Plant
5 1, ~<Yr {i i. e:` 1 ~.i^I'~E 1. 1 t+afl I p'1:1 S.Y.r it t.A ql Y. wA 1
X77' a !f a 8`-
a ly7 , "-i
(case r► x- lass)
Page Dour
R9COMMENI)ATION (Continued)
S. (continued)
Du1Mp or Sanitary Mill Area
Open 641VAJO Yard for Rugs or Malchinery* sto.
falrgrounda, or Exhibit Area
90400 oroupds>
Stable Private Club
Stable, Cosexcial Rental
Stablr~ uoardinq
Poultry Hatchery
Livestook Auction
UVWock'Eeedinq Plant. Pens or Yards
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with additional conditions
2. Approve petition without conditions
3. Approve petition with conditions
4. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. P14anreed development concept plan
3 , Reply fora totals
4. Property owner list
5, Ninuteo or Planning and Zoning commission meeting of
September 12, 1984
0l15a
v r G, '.;r 4~ .girl n f~.~ 9flA j, i'„~ fU+'}Y"JI 6f' \ti c NV'i"~~I 4 r off. cL.1r.. .i t n I "h"
\ H it..i +°~i IY # 41 1 t.! Cr'r ~ a' S. ,u' f
j
,i
~ AtlIt It UL iURE XONE
1004af'
ti
COT I ~I I6CAIrOtl tl~~p.
0
yu . lyo
U
7 tot z ail
P. 0, fN 06MY INDUSTRIAL ZONE i
~ (A@Bip4N11AL LAMD USC PKOMI tl}tEb) I
AARICULTURt
,ONE
AORICUL ME outylet nr. I,~ns
LONG
tot 5
I
I
I
LOT 4
N
Ii
II
ryd
M
I
CALL "C
CNNMCACIAL ZONt
I
Iw , i.O 7.6NINO PLAT
p v ~y' ~•t,(,1 ,I f ~'rr 1~ i. f n •U. ~ I . t
L'
~~M1I ~ t i fl, ,4 !.!H u,1 :41~ 1 ..'l I' ~ I tmi• N j t f i ' 6 t ? e
77"-" r. .-I. -T 'Yr N' 1 . q,, r Yra
s rxr 7
PROpERT'Y OWM 1tXPLY IP ORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-I689
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
Joe 84 Evans None Received
Star Route South
Saint %lot TX 76265
Mrs. track :miller
402 Mimosa
Denton, Texas 76201
s;
A (s r r C 1 s ' '4 l u t)i' {i° g s j'r F1 Vr(,Ca s i 1$~ t h'~"li~
p:
6
z
/
1 '
5
Alf"
AtYAI
T - ' F
Svc ~ ir: +
zb,
r
f
II zG~
I'A -L
u 9 ,
d d~c~t ~111- i1Lir 1,4 tl,"1~i~M1~ I7 x 7~y In ;!-7,
j 5~115{i i. 4 1x1 i . tifi'
U~Cm
' f °.__,".,'v.'."t'n..'--~" ,fi...s"",-T ",.'f ` i'^^',' u~.- ;.,nom-,.s-arm's.-. ?.°r °~*4 7
P ~ Ni Ii11t1a
Smpti~Nber"lZ, 198~
Page' 8
Mr, Mayer stated the nominations are now open for vice.
cat i roan.
Mr. LaPorte nominated Mr, Bscue for vice-chAi'eman, Mr. Bscue
accepted the nomination. Seconded by ldr. Pearson,
Mr. Sidor made a motion nominations cease. Seconded by Ms.
Cole and passed (7-0).
Vote was called: Aye - All; Nay none.
C. :i689. 'this is the petition of Joe Evans ro4uesting,a
ange in zoning from the africultural (A) classification
~4') to the planned development PD) classification on 2003
ept~° acre tract located on tae cast side of March Branch Road
approximately $83 fee't`sou(th of 'U, S. Highway 380, if
approve°d, the planned development would permit light
industrial (LI) land use.
Ms, Spivey stated there 'were 6 reply forms mailed to
property owners within 200 feet of the subject propertyl
3 were returned in favor and zero in opposition,
,Mr. Charles'Natkins 5tatad 'ne is with Fields, Edwir4s' 6
Associates and is representing Mr, 'Evans. He stated he
had decided to request pl`ahhad development zoning and is
aware this is a residential,-area. He described the sur-
rounding land uses and Stated ne has 'discussed the'-condi-
tions with`Mr, Evans as recommended by the staff and is
agreeable to all of the conditions.
on.question from ,Mr, Sidor,'Mr, Watkins stated there are
several `fut'ilre uses of the proposed, lie stated staff had.
recommended no hauling 'or storage; companies be allowed;
and nope this won't prohibit warehouses,
Mr,. Mohammad About-Slla, a resident near this area,
stgted'he ie''not spoaking for or against tUe proposed but
would like to klnow the specific industry indicated, He
asked if there were plans for the proposed that would
create air, noise or water pollution. He asked if there
would be any increase in traffic; and if so would there
be any improvements to the roads.
Chairman Claiborne stated the qu,Astionc would be answered''
later at the time given ior'questions and answers.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
~.is• gp"ivey stated .',t'-bii sits,.is; laca+t"pa in. a moderate
intensity area, existing l'and` uses along Masth Iieanth
goad range from ranch' or esitte type housing and attrac-
tive singlerfaoily, to a steel company, commercial. and
a e , i `r i '~yl'T`:et}~ °{5+ 1 ' Ifi _ '5f'd,111^ ~ .n sB+ ~ ^ ~
Sepomher 12, 19$4
Page 9
Y11 7~,
$0611 bu##nes.s uses. $pecificslly staff counted twelve
h
(1x) residences 410 six (G) businesses along Maschh Branch
Ro*d between'Hi$hway 384 and Jim C4rlstal Road $
ficant amount' of agricultural (A) and undeveloped pro
arty also exists in the area, Although a moderate in en-
sit:y desipat,i-on exists at this site, the Development
uuide.encout&*'os protection of low density residential
areas wi't'hin one b;lock`of potential high intensity;
developments throw"$h measures normally associated with
planned. develo tent SPD toning, This 're uest is for
ppil~nned devei'o dent PD zoning that would permit light
industrial land use. She stated it is not the opinion of
the staff to prohibit warehouses. She stated no resi-
dences abut the subject tract. Future significant resi-
dential`devel'opMent is being discouraged because of the
proximity of this area to the municipal airport. The
petitioner has agreed to a planned development condition
that would prohibit residential land use at this site,
She further stated approval of this request is consistent.
with policids that discourage residential develophent in
i the airport;srot, Staff feels that the residential devel
opmeint in this noder"ate>intensity; area is worthy Q(, pro-
Staff Staff recommends approval of Z-1689.
Mr. Watkins stated 'none `of 'the proposed areas will create
noise, air or water polluti'bn. He stated any type of de-
velopaont will increase traffic, nowever, he stated he is
awara the petitioner is subject to perimeter street
paving.
Chairman declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1689
with the following conditions:
10 Residential land use will be prohibited at this site.
1. Development on this tract shall not exceed two (2)
tories in height.
stories'
' 3. 9uildings and parking,must have a minimum fifty (SO) foot
setback from the front property line,
4. Parking lot design must position parking lot lights away
from existing single family residence to, the west.
Possible' specific site plan approval required.
5. 'Cho following land uses will be specifically prohibited
in the'piaaned development (PD)
Dormitory, 8oar4ir or Rooming House
Trailer Camp or No ,le Bogle Park
i,
na~3:''~~s..?~i ;-F'fi5r¢gy-aF "ar/'ait'.+~ !i. re:~'n, ~,._T p.v^n_. i. T` •-+f-~':r 5e ...m
ti ~ ' ~ Z llftlytei
"Ptebor 12, 1964
Cemetery; or mausoleum
Halt 4o*y House
Home for c%jo of Alcoholic, Narcotic or psychiatric
Patients
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
A a0ooent, Commercial Outdoor, Drag 'Strip or Racing
Go-Cart Track
Drive in Taoatre
Flauling or Storage Company
'Cure Re-Treading or Capping
cool or Trailer Rental
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Sand Gravel or Earth Sales and Storage
Trat or.aenta,i or;Sales
Storage and Sales of Furniture or `Appliances
outside a Byildin*
Extraction Ana, Sale of $and, Wiche, Stone,
Cloy or Gr6001
a. Miping or Stolctige of Mthing Wastes
AsphaltOr Concrete Batchin` Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or. Tile Print
Dump or $*Attary 1'i11 Area
Ope6 $A14d' Yard ,for kegs or Machinery, etc.
Fairground.. or Exhibit Area
Rodeo Grounds;
Stable, Private Club
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable„ Boarding
Poultry Hatthery
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
i Seconded by Ar. Pearson and unanimously carried (7.0)',
5. 81. This is the petition of Sigma,'Tau Gamma Fraternity
re casting a `specific, use permit to operate a fraternity
it, ah Office (0) zoning district at'the ;northwest corner
of West `Oak Street `and 'Fry `Street. The"property is more
particularly described as 1$02 West Oak Street.
Ms, Spivey stated th*re;we.re,14 reply forms oailod to
property owner's within 200 feet of the subject property;
was opposed and zero 'returned' in favor.
Mr. Juren asked if any fraternity could go in at this
site, or just this one 'applying for the specific use?
Ms. Spivey stated the specific use goes with the land and
not wttb,the residents, according to the city attorney.
Mr..Meyer stated the Commission could instruct the Plan-
ning and Community Development Department to keep in eye
r dpi-.;A:y y~
aM'Tt?' 17 1Pi ,',~`.°I
-7 _71
NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING NAP OF THE CITY OF. DENTON TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS, ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE Coot OF oRDI CEi OF THE
CITY OF DEKON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE Nis,' 69.1 AND AS SAID HAP APPLIES
TO 20.366 ACRES OF 'LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE of MASCH b"SCH
ROAD APPKOXIMATELY $93 FEET SOU'T'H Or U- So HIGHWAY 380 AND IS MORE
PAATICIt Y DESCRIDED NItREINi TO PROVIDE FOR A CHAN}~I IN ZONING
CLABSIFFICATION AND
CLASSIFIION rRON AORtCULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "Poll CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFCCTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
i SECTION 1.
That the soning classification and use designation of the
following described property, to-wits
a
All that certaia' tract or parcel of lead siktiwted is the William
Brvan'Survey, Abstract No, 14g, Damon County$ T x4s, being the
north 20.366 acres of a certain 29.9 sore traot'daedhd by rreeda M.
Duffle to Joe Evans on February 99 19$9, recorded in Volulse 445,
Paso S8, Dead Records of said County, and being more particularly
described as followat
' BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said 29.9 acre tract in the
Middle of A public road on the west line of Bryan Survey;
, NENCE south 86°35'10" east with a fence 1003.45 feet to a fence
corner at the northeast corner of said tract;
TH1NCE south 0°58'30" west with a fence on said east line 882,92
foot to a steel pin;
THENCE north 88°54' west across said tract 999.91 feat to a corner
on this west line of said tract and said survey in the middle of
said road;
road 888.43 it,
THENCE north 0°45'30" east with line insaid
to the plyce of beginning, containing
in all Is hereby ota►nged from Agricultural "A'! District Classification and
n.` Use designation to Planned DeYelopient "PD"'Classification "and Use
to permit Light Industrial ILL" land use designation under the
comprehensive totting ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
That in approving this planned development district ordioando,
the City Council hereby approves s prilimittary site ;loo' showing
the general proposed land uses within the district, Prior to the
issuance of say building. permit for development within the district
or part thereof, _a comprihonsive site plan Ahall be required to be
submitted and approved as part of this ordinance in accordance with
Articlo 11, Appendix B-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances.
SECTION III..
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building within the planned development district, the
following conditions sha,11 Ma mat:
Z~i.59/JOE EVAN9/PAGE 1
J F i ry ' rl ` "Ti ry' „ryF^A'd..J. C"'^qR (4. Z~{ , . t 'may' .Rnlttu, r~
~ I r+ 4
1
f
1. Residential land use will be prohibited at this site.
2. No building within. the development on this tract shalt exceed
two (2) stories in height.
3. Buildings and pparkin areas must have a minimum fifty (50) foot
setback from Mooch Branch Road rirht-of-way line adjoining the
property.
4. Parking lot design mustposition parking lot lights away from
existing single family residence to the west.
5. The following land uses are specifically prohibited in the
planned davelopment (PD)I
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
?railer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Half»Vay House
How for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric Patients
Private Utility 'Shop or Storage Yard
Amusement Coooorcial outdoor, Drag Strip or Racing Go-Cart Track
Drive Yn atre ,
Hauling or Storege Cospaay
Tire R••Treading or Capping
'fool or 'frailer Rental
HasVy Machinery Sales and Storage
Sadd, Gravel or Earth 'Sales and Storage
Trailer, Rental or Sales
storage"and Sales of Furniture* or Appliances Outside a building
Extraction add Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone, Clay or Grcvotl
Minist orrStorags'of Mining 'castes ,
Asphalt or Concrete ppaatching Plant (permanent)
Br ok Kiln or Tila Plant
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Open Salvage Vard for Rags or Machinery, etc.
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Rodeo Grounds
Stable, Private Club
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Poultry Hatchery
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
SECTION IV.
That the development of the property &hall be in substantial
compliance with the site plan attached hereto and made A part hereof
for all purposes.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of'Jaouatiyy, 1969, 44,an Appsindix to the Code of' Ordinances of
the City of Dantod, Texas unddetr Ordinance No. 69-1, be, add the
sane is hereby amended to show such change in Diitfiot Clasaifi-
cation and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications.
SECTION V.
That the City Council of the City of Deutorii Texas, herebyy finds
that such change is in accordance with's eosprehansivs plan for the
l+urpose of promoting the general welfare) of the City of Denton,
Texas and with reasonable consideration, amaonp other things for
the character of the district and fort its pad, gar suitability or
particular` ussa, and with a view to conssrvinA the value of the
2-1689/JOK EVANS;4AGE 2
.n✓ / .1. '.T "tl < ~r1I 777,, 4+ I rtmp. `T,"9'7.m.n~fi ex twltakf ~'.~:4
11
buildings, protecting human livw $ and encouraging the most appro
ppriate uses of land for the maxious benefit to the City of Denton,
Texas, and its citisens.
SECTION- YI.
That this ordinapoe shall be in full force and effect ismsdi-
ately aftwr i a passage and approval, the required public hearings
hovini heretofore been held by the Planning and xoninS Commission
and t 0 City council of tt%o City of Denton, Texas, after giving due
notice thereof.
PASSW AND'APPROUD this the day of 19tl4.
MAIM
ItIMM Q. STRUT,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST
CHARLOTTE A w, IjA
CITY OX AB
APPROVED AS TO W" r W
JOE D. Us ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF 0lWTON, TEXAS
BYa_S.wun
r
L-1689/JOE EVANS/PAGE 3
f
1 , +r
I A:/1111! 111111 !1 VI( 1 I 9 ~1~,} \
.vau ~ 111M.,,
' ..IY y 1 .M1 •IrI N
101 I
f - =1o to
C
l01 !
_ p 0 f« i1611t MOIISf11lA1 lohC I
p.v/nnM MMi lra /MaMNpJ
r . b1flI~IINI( 'IP^!. nn•il
in1 f H
i N
C...._,_.J tot .
i
i 1
f' MAI I *1 'Al :.l, 0 1
KW LCNIIMI het.
n l +jlJ~i;{t~ v Mt
r N Y ei..-~"'~'`.., ~.+vraei.-„v .x- •+.tr~ ;.....~`V~R 5 vB'k~".
COINrMWI'IQM CITY COMIL
r
Tot Denton city council
Case NO.: S-181 Meeting Date: October x, 1984
GRUERAL I NIFOMT I ON
11pp1ScaAtt SigiavTo Gamin
1$02 Nest Oak street
D AtOn. TX 76201
Status of Applicant: Fraternity representative
Requested Action: A specific use perstit to allow the
opetaton Of a ftaternity in an office
(0) sorting district
Location and Size: An ap'ptoxilwo' ly Wo square foot lot
located at the northwest corner of
N, Oak and Pry 8tt.oets. The property
is stars particn14tl7 11e80ribed as
1302 Nest Oak Street.
Surrounding Land Use
and zoning,. North - Singlo.fAsily residential -
Multi-family; 20-1
South - Ptaiternity hauael'SF-7
East - Single family residential;
S9'-7
Nest - Multi-family residential; NF-
Denton Developlkent Guide: Mea is designated as 1Ow intensity
SPRCI1i1L INFORMATION
Drainage: Drainage is poor in this atea4
Transportation: Thivtra0t has tontage ors Nest Oak
Street designated as a 0611e0t0r. and
Tory Street, 6,10041 residential.
street. The site flan shows that
access to the tract will be from Fry
Street.
lagN T11o
6
SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued)
utilities: A 12" water lino and a a" sewer line
are located in front of this property
on Hest Oak Street and a e" water
line and a 6" sewer line are located
in Fry street, Electric* jaso tole-
phone, and cable T.V. services are
available to the tract.
ANALYSIS
This'site is ioaated in a. low intensity area. Lox intensity
ere{ poli01*0 ennouxeys solve land ,'4 diverNity it proteotton
of the neighborhood and 'ad)aoeot housih'jj is yrovided, but at$-
oouragas o0ncent,rattons of ~aulti-family,, office, oommerdiait and
other higher deneity/inteaeity land uees, The Development Quid*
wpecittis five (5) criteria that diverse land uses should most
when proposed is a low intensity residential area. These cri-
teria are ae follows;
1, strict site desigqn within one block of existing low density
residential bousiaq is provided. This is a specific use
p4rait request and development requirements Can be attached
before occupancy occurs. Fencing can be required along prop-
arty lines abutting residences to provide adequate screening
and reduce noise levels.
s. Final intensity studies shOw that this area is approximately
10 percent over the standard,
3. Traffic planning ~n~iurss access by'a collector strut or,
larger, and nor'through local lows deasity'streets. The site
has frontage on*est Oak Street, designated a collector on
the City of Dentoa'Thoroughfare Plans however, the existing
garage And. parking area will be accessed from Fry `Street, a
16641 residential street.
4. Sufficient green space area for reoreationai facilities to
provided.' This provision is got applicable due to the size
of the tract.
5. Input into planning by the neighborhood. It is difficult to
ascertain the degree of input 4olicited by the petitioner or
offered by the neighbors when staff, is not directly ibvolved
~in^arv"#v 'C. +~qT•n, +~:f5 Z.'~'C~~"4'Y'~.T 'F1R-'T~i.~yp!~* !vyY ; f'4 'i'..5`IF YID yM']xj1iF'6.,Ge a e'h I117R~ ~~'"~'fq~~R~
77,
«Re I- ISO
P490 Three
RECOMMU ATYON
The Planting and Zoning Commission felt that the proposed land
use was conpatibls with existing land uses and would "not 'nega-
tiwly impact the area. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recomaoAdt approval of 9-161 by a vote of 5 - 2 with the follow-
ing conditions,
1. No detached signs shall be constructed or maintained on the
property.
24 On the west property liar a solid wood fence shell be
erected and continuouslyy stint OW in good repair, such
fsa6l shall be of a *iniMW height of six foot4 except tot
the xxailt yard" where a h Cole's; shall be of the •axiOus<
Qoipbt'bl}o"d by the xo~ibq ofd~p~4pbb', 'All teo*sasr "r-
bits ce4ulr44 by the Code of Or4in4noss shall be obta nod
prior to the eteoti0n of any t*aot ne0606ary to comply with
the conditions stated herein.
ALTERNATIVES
i, Approve specific ues permit with conditions
2. Approve specific use perait without conditions
3. Deny specific use permit i
ATTACHMENTS
1. Aerial
2. Specific Ust Permit site Plan
3, Reply lOr1' otal$
4. Propitty owner list
S. minutes of planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 'of
September 12 i9S4
0264)
17
flip
sob
Jill,
Qa wrgt s!
14
S M
New
eN N
oziff
Sit
y
Jill
i 4Tim. ,mx+~grpseer~•.~mr.. ~ mw-1x`r•w•+n)n Yflly "•'-'~^C . -~e+"#*a ~rv~+w-. . et^~rcmTR`-iR •`~m~•xTl'A-' i M" c'~n r~r
TY ' ~MX YOM
CITY 'COtJpCIL
S-101
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECID A
None Received a, E, LiAscombe
208 Anthony
McKinney, TX 75069
G4 E, Lueoombe
1232 Cak Street
Denton, TX 76201
i
i
I
E
G
I
E
r►
1
I
1
bcr-or~roo M
kg& -7
5
1 l ~i
6,73 9 7.2 4L.
75~~~1
Liu
["&Use
1, Z_
,B
J
/6 2.14
X55
J
J
I h,
/.5
f T`SF~[+ l;a. 'tA~4nnFf`+.1: c~ ~mv s,srasrer~Y','b'rvrixvTr ''TR , n•`4?R- n ` i.fip;•P u., n W y, 1T_1` ~1 •P, .~tj?{ra 7A ~4i.
s„ is
SooteY~bor 171 1944
Page 10
i
Cemetery or Mausoleum
ii010way House
Home for Caro of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric
Patients
Pr#'vatq Utility Shop or storage Yard
Amusement, Commercial Outdoor, Drag Strip or Racing
t;o•Cart Track
Drive in Taotre
mauling or Storage Company
Tire RooTreading or Capping
Fool or Trailer Rental
Heavy Machinery Sates and Stocagq
Sand Gravel or Barth Sales and Storage
Tro.i1er Rental or Salts
SRQra e'snd Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Qutiide a gullding
Extraction aad;Site of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravol
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Asphalt or Concrete Botching Plant (permanent)
trick Ki'lh or Tile' Plant
Uuap dr Sanitary Fill Area
Op'sn' Saivagq Yard; for (tags or Machinery, etc,
P&, rgrounds or Exhibit Area
Rodeo Grounds
Stable, Private Tub
Stable, <Commercial itental
Stable,, Boarding
Poultry Hatchery
LIVestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Seconded by Ar. Pearson and unanimously carried (7.0),
o.l 5.181. This is the petition of Sigma Tau Gamma Fraternity
rr q sting a'specific use p,erait to opperate a fraternity
in in office (0) zoning district at the northwest corner
of West Oak PQ~po particularly Street . as y 1302 Street. West Oak Street~y is more
Ms, Spivey stated there were 14 reply forms sailed to
property owners within 200 foot of the subject property;
1 was opposed and zero returned in favor.
Mr. Juren asked if any fraternity could go in at this
site, or just this one applying for the specific use?,
Ms. Spivey stated,t,lo specific use goes with the land and
not with the-resld4~fts, according to the city attorney,
Mr. Meyer stated th<} Commission could instruct the Plan-
ning and Community Development Department to `keep an eye
,r
T y7f!A_777, 7"R
. .77
f A' z ci4,iA11us
SeP>r*' er its 1Si~4
Page 11
on this subject for six (6) months. He further stated
the city can backaone at any time.
Scott Rosinskio Vice-President of Sigma Tau Gamma, stated
this is too-newest fraternity on campus and has been it
oxists'ace since'MAy of 1683. He stated $o~ae Qf the sccom-
plishmeats of the fraternity as well as the charitle's
they are involved with. He stated they have cleaned up
tae area, painted and ;lave done some landscapingg, lie
stated this request for a spoctfic use `permit '+i l allow
them to display their fraternity letters on the front of
the house. He stated the principle use is a fraternity
n04 a at,OaK and Pry Streets And there are four members
livtng'thare. He stated they chose this area so as not
to, disrupt any residdntial area as other fraternities
have,, He described the surrrounding isnd uses. He
st ite.d'--.there ;is enouy~ h parking in too bAck yard to
accoAddats those living there' and,also;for r~setings, He
stated ,the fraternity would eventually like to buy, the
house and are presently in a lease/purchase agreement.,
on question f coo ,+tr, Sid,or, Mr. Resinski ~ stated yes, they
are agreeable to the conditions as recommended by staff,
Mr. Aeyer stated we have received a, number of calls
stating that a fraternity already exists there.
Cdr. Resinski stated they leave h6ld one meeting there and
three parties that have ended at midnight. He stated
there are four members living there.
On question from 14r. Pearson, ktr, Resinski stated six
would ultimately live "there,
on"question from Mr, Pearson, Mr. Resinski stated yes,
they had been located on Avenue 8`arid moved as they were
disturbing the neighbors,
On question from Mr, Juren, :dr, Resinski stated they were
a national fraternity,
Mr; Claiborne asked htr. sesinski in regard to the
fraternity house,l'ocated directly 'across the street from
tue fraternity house in'question, wouldn't the traffic
situation on Oak and Fry Streets be conjested if'they
outa'decided to have a party on the sane night.
Mr. Resinski'stated they have adequate parking and in his
opinioin would not be `con jested.
Mr. Meyer asked if these are four living there now, how
many are in attendance for social events?
Ar 7PIPTRI 711W Af1 7-1 ^'.°t" 4i F +:.e.r s~ 'yic "r
, r~ ,~',Nll~utes
~ept~lilrM! il, 1ylA
Past lt'
Mr, Resiliski answered around 75 ppeople, We stated the
major problem is durlna rush, which is t:te first week of
each semeater when'they have an open party and it could
be as many as 300` at one time,
Mr. Orrin Freeman stated he owns property adfacent to
this property, located directly west of the Yoartmannl s
parking lot. He owns a small apartment house and has had
several, complaints of the fraternity to the south on Fry
and Oak Streets, He stated there is an_excoCIYe amount
of noise' and creates a terrible traffic probleM in the
area. He stated there is always several pounds of trash
and likes-to keep his property clean and 3n better shape
than when he bouight'it.
On que,sllon from chairman Claiborne, Mr, Freeman stated
$4* there has 'been a lot 'of litter especially the south
ast corner and not just during rush week, He stated
there is continual noise.
Ms, Spivey stated this site is located.n a low intensity
area,, Low intensity,area,pol'icies eno'ourait sone land
usedi'versity if protection of ti1e neighborhood and' ad3a-
cent'h'ousing is provided, but-discourage .concentrations
of Multi»family, office,; commercial, And other higher
density/intonsity land uses. The Development Guide
specifie five criteria that diverse larld uses should
met when pt'opos;ed in a low 'htensty residential area,
oo stated tho criteria. She stated due to the fact that
this neighborhood has already been,"impacted by,frater-
pities, the hi'git density of the area, and the,heavy
traffic at this location, staff recommends denial of
S-i81, She `stated if the Commission is inclined to
grant this request, it is suggested'tnat the following
standards be applied;
1) No"devached signs shall be allowed.
t) A six (o) foot solid wood screeningfence si4all be
et+,rected and extended on the west property line.
Mr. Resthikl, stated t14'e trash Mr. Freeman is referring to
is the adjacent property; o'wder,. He staged the fraternity
had aparty on fhday night and after the ,party picked up
trash and on Saturday morning went dut into Oak Street
and pror,eded to pick up trash,. He stated ti4Y `tam tried
to pick:!an area which would have the least impact in the
neighborhood and stated they have the potential to have a
good naoW,
On "question from M!, Sidor Mr. Res'inskl stated there is
someone in the college administration to report mis-
oidsrly conduct and parties to and they come `down harder
on us titan the police do.
0
ri
eptblrmlx, ly#4
P+s~• 13
Chair declared the public hearing closed,
Chairman Claiborne stated whin he came to town 10 years
a othe city fathers voted agsinst a fraternity row,
wAich I rea11y don't understand, "lie stated the problem
he has with 'the specific use permit is the Conjestion
that it Ott cause at the intersection 'of Oak and pry
Streets4 a commended Mr. Resinski for their activity
accomplishments.
On question From Mr. Sidor, Mr. Meyer stated no, accord-
1ng to the city attorney's new opiiiiop:s, the commission
could ot request that it be approved: kt to exceed one
year.
Mr. $~Wor com0hted that since this is,* new fraternity,
and since we don't know now they are going to act, he
s. -would like to put a 't iae limit on it,
Mr,,,Juren commented that they would not Out that many
improvements into the property if they loose their permit
in 12 Months.
,Ar, Pearson stated "there are stveral frsl'irnities in the
area and most are 'adequately kept. He 'stated it is
7 usually fairly, a quite area and he intends to vote for it. ~
i
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of S-181
with the following conditions:
1) No detached signs shall be allowed.
i
2) A six (6) foot solid wood fence shall be errected-and
extended on the west property line.
Seconded by W4,Pearson and carried 4-2. (Mr. LaPorte
i errand Ms. Cole voted no.)
B. Recoaaend approval of the final replat of Township II,
phase 1l (San Jacinto Plaza Si►opping center).
' Mr, 911i's6i stated this '12,17 acre tract located between
son Jacinto Doule,Yard , Piney Creek Boulevard, Township
il$ Pnase.ii,,,phase I, 'a ad the Ssg servite''rosd is
zoned planned development (Pn=a for coiimerci'a1 land
use.. 14e stated a ',proposed 60,000 square food Mervyn's
Department Store represents the major user or anchor for
tfie shopping center. Mervyn's will occupy lot 4 as
e6tly shown, °I'n ad'dition`'to Mervyn!our se smarm
tuildings with combined retail lease spice of 690182
square feet is proposed.
Y'
a~,PZl' +~i._177R rata rr'.Rnrn"vs!"t1 'f ^.fef'T?±~r P, yavM.1 t
R 7r re {n, "FIV
'Ile
s=
1
N0.
AN ORDINANRE xNG A SPECIFIC USE Pkltt'ljjT FOR A rRATF~;t~1ITY;
PROVIDING FOItREFERSNCINO OF SUCH USE ON THE 20NINO MAP Of
THE CITY Ql~ D TEalA5, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO
Tits CODE F OIEO~ C9S OF; TH! CITY OF DENTON TIVAS, BY ORDINANCE
N04 69.11 AND SAID MAP APPLIES TO 1302 WEST OAK STKEET FIN THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXASI AND DECLARING AN EFCTIVK
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HE1t3Y ORDAINSt
SECTION 1
The Zoeing Clam sificetion.and Use designation of the property
x looeted at 1702 West Oak, being more particularly described as
~i- fol lows l
i` All that certain treat or parcel of land lying 'and piling
4 situated in the Cityy and County of Denton, State of tit,xa# a
par of the to Puchalski Survey, and more particularly desori~ed
as ~ollowst
BEGINNING at a point 30 feet north and 10 feet west of the
soukh.ast corner, of a lot out of said survey, convoyyed by Myr•
E, Middle and` husband to Mrs, Mary A• Woodwards on November 14
1904, by Deed recorded in Voluae so, Page 631, of the Dead
Records of Denton County, Texas-, the same being the intereeetton
of the north Tina of West Oak Street with the west line of Pry
Street in said City of Denton;
THENCE west 90 feet to corner in the north Lima of West 'Oak
Street;
THENCE north 173 foot for corner;
THENCE east 90 feet to corner in the west line of Fry Street;
THENCE south with the west line of Fry street 113 feet to the
place of beginning;
which is classified as Office "0" District Claatification Use
under the Cosprehenaive Za> ing Ordinance of the City of Denton,
Texaa, is hereby granted for tno use of said property a speoifir.
use permit for a fraternity subject to the following conditions
and restrictions to-wit:
1. No detaahed 'eigns shall be constructed or maintained
on the property.
2. Oa the weat property line & solid wood'fence shall
be 4toctied and continuously maintained in good
repair, Such fence shall be of aminis" height of
six foot, except for the "front' ysrdl! where such
fence ihall be of the mixiium height allowed by, the
zoning ordinance. `A11' nroesssry permits required
by the Code of Ordinances mall be obtained prior
to the erection of any fence necessary to comply
with the conditions stated he;rain.
5-181/SIGMA TAU GAMMA/PAGE 1
v <
4
r U4TIRP+ It.
The Z6'004 Ms of tho City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
d y of January, 19690 as an Appendix to the Code of W dinanc44
o the city of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69.1, shall be
referenced to show the property heroin described being granted a
specific use permit for the use approval herein,
SCCTION 1110
That the City Council of the 'City of Denton, Texas hereby
finds that such use is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of pvtoottng the enaral welfare of the City of
Dinton, axes, and w th reasonable consideration# o wng other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability' or particular uses, and with a view to oonsorvia
j the 'value of the b►lildinn4gs, protoctin` human lives, ani'
eaoourasids the most a propriate uses of land for the "ximum
benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens
t That this ordidanoe shall be in `full force and affect
issma,dtately after its' a$sage and approval, the 44uired public
hearings having heretofore -been held by the planning and zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DL TON,.TEXAS
APPK6VED AS TO LEGAL FOAM:
JOE D.'M011AIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DLNTON, TEXAS
BY: w~h
S-181/SIGMA TAU GAWM/PA(;E 2
{a'~f I ~.1 y. 'y
Y r ~~II~ ~ r
~t~~ _ l~'' !'D rNwM
r
a a~ A? moo
►PA 0 arr~ y
E
p:
So I
t-
~w
3
f
,
3-181
r
r _
ii
i;~PTr..Tie`g~z•'a
~111111*4 Awo101RING cow: $110
P4` ft MR1 IATZW TO TIM CITY ~bUSCIL
Too Denton City Council
Case'No.s Z-1685 Meeting Dates October 2, 1984
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicants City of Denton
(Zd Wolski request)
Requested Actions Change in stoningg from agricultural
(A) clasrsification to the planned
development (PD) classification for
light industrial use
purposes unknown
Location and Sizes A 130.6 acre tract of land located at
the southeast corner of Jim`Christal
Road and Masch Stanch Road
Existing Land Uses Agriculturnl and one residential
dwelling
Surrounding Land Use
and Zonings North - Agricultural, single family
- residential, Southwest Cooler
Servippi A,
South - Agricultural, airports A, LI
East - Agricultural, single family
residentialr A
West - Agricultural, airports A, LI
Denton Development; Guides Area is designated as high intensity
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainages A branch of South Hickory Creek runs
through the property and drainage will
r ration at this site
Transportations Perimeter street paving ordinance will
apply to both Jim Christal and Masch
Branch Roads. Jim Christal is a sec-
ond ry major arterial with 80 feet of
right-of-way. Masch Branch Road
~N ron" ^r;1 '"''ry,'~. .`:A~t ~.tg'R'. '"'~'~r t •'9 '^r' a n : r -s..y w++3sRt : i t~
(Cage 1 Z-148'0
P
v 4e TWO
SPNCIAL IMPOS ATION (Continued)
i. Tran, portation1 shat~]d t~ a collector With ,60 feet of
lay. dff site i>R,pt' ovmments
(Continued)' right-o w
r should b: considered to dim Christal
Road as it cannot supporr, heavy
p, traffic in its current condition.
Utilities: Water service is currently not
available to this sits. Water ser-
vice can be extended from a fine at
the Municipal Airptrt, The Hickory
Creek sewer line crosses this prop-
erty and 'provides service to this
tracts Telephone and electric
service can be provided ,§t the site.
Gas and cable T,V, service are not
available at this location,
ANALYSIS
This site is located in an area dei14noted as one of three higgh
Intensity or major activity centers in the City of Denton. Lit
tle or no control of intensity is.pproposed for high intensity or
major activity centers. In,generel, major activity centers Are
expected to be-the'major industrial, commercial and employment
centers of the City. Specifically,.` the airport area is seen as
the City's dominant employment centsr that will eventually result
in a capacity of over 18,000 jobs in the area. The petitioner's
request for light industrial noising complies with Development
Guide policies for this area.
Z-1685 was presented to the,City Council for its consideration
on September 18, 1984, At that time, the Council was hesitant
to approve straight light industrial zoning in the vicinity of
the ;airport . Specifically, the Council was concerned that
residential development could occur at this site clue to the
cumulative nature of the zoning ordinance. With the consent of
the petitioner, the Councii,voted to refer t~i• case beck to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for considera~ ion as a pianned
development. The City Attorney's office has informed staff that
another public hearing will not' be neccessary'for this item.
g
Y
777,
't1 (Case 0 1-1665)
Page Twee
RE COMM UDAT IOW
The planning w %oni" Co issibn.corsidered this iisi at its
moettng of 8lptiabor 21# 119141 &hd v6t'id to recommend approval by
a vote of 7 -'0 with the following conditionst
1. specific site plan'.Apr,NNk val will be required before
building permits art- j,seued,,
2. This site is restricted to light industrial use only - n
residential land use permitted.
3. All structures will be limited to two stories in height.
ALTERNATIVES
1• Approve petition'
p 2. Deny petition
e' 3. Approve petition with conditions
f ATTACHMENTS
1 Aerial
2. PD Concept Plan.
3. Reply forms total ( 09/18/64 public hearing)
4. P,rbperty owner list
5. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of
September 26, 1904
i
r 07368
I
oil
IAN
~t f
stye
' ~ ~ 'sf~ils „ o
• ` . " •QOQ or lld• IN ~QORtOr ,"'Rd. , • e4b'Lti01 Rd. • ,
40P k
C j irchi1,C`e ° r b ,air
I
'R 4i
° °so r 1
Fj'C Id'
DE N TON
s x ar ?r. aia:~C_'~' r_a► t~' ! o t.-
4 V l• V
"I
lit I
' • ~ 11 ~
9 "ice ~ , i 1 i a ~ I ~ f s
P, zm:f 68510
` apt ~r-~:' 1 m 3. r , . , , .1 _ ' ; , .
909 %w aR s"
44 F
- it
Ilk
a- AK r 0 a
fit
Z a'
1, t ; ' Q ~ „aYt~Ylt..~.~t i~lt~'f•r~ 1
.40 min
Y r ;f
-77
17
r7r
Y
r r ~
~nwv lcorr luxvev r„=e:
,
,
r Q
w
L-~
Y177 -TW
GITX •CQUitCII~
1-1689 (9/18/84 public haariiiq)
INFAVOR IN APPOSITION UNDECID
'Margorot Weaver Russell Paul muddell
902 East Rahd4ll Route l; Box 409
Beeville, TX 78102 Denton, TX 76205
n€r~ ,
Druce R, West
5:. 15301 Dallas Parkway.
suite 800
Dallas, TX 75248
t
r,
~S
{
~i,
77' TT i7mTr7IT"
FM1.r 1
H
good
4L add
f,
r
r y
dAjl AAA
r 1 1
r'
1P '
V
F
1
L X11 ' '
t
y ~ ~~A
klollrl
s
.,JV
i
s4 2
ti 'a!wr..ro'l.sy
r•
111M 1
Y#
i't$t 11,
f
~ 20. CpAatda'at~0ea
9> A. Nske a reoos ldat to the city ;Coiirsq a request
0~6 fort a altsaaS+. itt ft= 1VO the a riau cWar (A) alarri" i
li,oation to the p.►+Itl d develoao t 4104 illation -#OV (L1) uses
0414 1 0..4. apre tract loasted at sout9ean, onor
of J3t ristal loud mad Maach Branch Road (Z-1683),
Ms S1pi y atiited.'Z-im wes prasOO'4d to the Ci
Cot~na l qr- its conridsratioA ohs Sap>»ber 15, 1954
At that time , the Cauadil was hesitant to rppnrmre
str4i Hirt industrial soning in the viaiaity of
t fba aport, 3p♦cifi4,ally, the Council war concerned
that rasidenti4e dove loppu t could occur at this site
due to the cumulative Ann re of the sonin ordiaanae
With,the aonsout of the etitioner, the .Council;voted
to, refer th # "so yysok'to the Pi,atiai s and 'Zo~it►g
C4~issipa ~ar" aoaaideratiod as a platmar►d develgpa~ant.
. City A'Pt;0"Yr *",t
li 4e has inlorsrsd tta i' t
is orbAr iN* ' x li %Wt be neca#tsary or this
Still isth~4r s,tat iti►t! roidonwelds approval
of Z•16S S as a planned dawlopen t .
I
Mr Beau, >aade a motion to rorospwead approval of
Z-i"S with the fol'lowi ni conditions ;
1) Specific site plan approval will be required be
fore building permits are issued.
2) This site is restricted to light industrial use
only - no residential land use permitted,
3) All structures will be limited to two stories in
height or a maximum height allowed by the Airport
height regulations.
Seconded by Mr, Juren and unanimously carried (7-0),
i
~ a
1 .
08tDY 90100 MA? C1 of, C
I} 0~ i 1101
PAW Aft
P iH ~arAS. ~c
' IS tA~ITY Y DftS X1ED ro1tpU` 4'0 MDE tO1t C~iANtit
Ill GtABiYwICATx44i . ?EOlt AORtCU41'U1tA1.p ~p ~IS'1'RICT~
C WS I Ttoo 00 'USE Put 0NAr10N r0 N AMf1tD OV N "tD'
W AS$I1rMAT,ION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND ?E IDI va AN
LrrgcTIYE DAT=.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0! DEY"o TLXAS, HEMY OAAAINS:
'r
SECTION I.
t rbat tbo woinS olaasifiettiab sad use desiSoattoe of the
followift des'pribed,property, to-wits
!f'` All tj't asrtain ,tXiFoR or `parciiof land situsted Jo the John
Scott, i ey, Abstract No. 1222, Denton ounty, tons 0, being a
h. part of a (eallsq 129.44 sore tract 404stibsd to a deed from V
r it and patella grown t,o 59 A. waver at ux► to the 8th
i. day of Decaabor, 19S1, recorded in Volumm 3~6, ?a a 1690 Deed
yd of said County. and being swse fully 1easribed as
- µl,l =
BLGINKNO at the northwest corner of said 129.44. aora tract
which is the northwest corner of the John Scott Survey and the
southwest corner of the W, Bryan Survey, Abstract 148, on the
east boundary line of Match Breach Road;
THENCE north' 89*5614514 'east in and near Jim. Chrystal Road (East-
wrst) and with the north boundary line of the J. Scott Survey a
distance of 1889.19 feat to an iron pin at the northeast corner
of said 129.44 sore tract;
THENCE south past at 22.4 feet a fence corner and continuing
along and near said facto a distance of 3958.00 feet to a fence
corner at the southeast corner of said 129.44 acre tract on the
south boundary line of the J. Scott Survey;
THENCE north 89°52'35" we►tit with said survey line along and near
a fence a distance of 764,20 fast to an iron pin at the south
southwest cotuor of said tract;
THENCE north along and near a fans a distance of 1333.00 feet
to an iron pin at an inner all corner of said tract;
THENCO south 89"47145" west a distance of 448.13 fast, to as iron
pia at the southeast of a (called),6.09 Bare treat described in
a deed frog 1. A. -Waver, at " to'the City of Denton on the 5th
day of October, 1477, recorded 'in' Volusie 857, ?age 5230 Dead
Records of Denton Coudty, Texas; fast on it thnorth e northeast 6 cornor of distance said City of De ton Tract, an iron
pi
TNWC sou4d_69.47145" want a di'stames of 7,43.52 feat to an 'iron
pia at the northwest corner of said City of Dedtoa Trott on the
z-16e511D Yo1.aK:IrACE'l
t N `I.. ~h,*l,rT N 1 f'•{~, I t..V: xN~ S1IM1~'. n,. fi'~!~.' ~i'll ~T~;'.` Yr y SMt`~A d"#e,n `1 ; ~i a
i Vast beuad+►sy lino o9 said 129.44 sore tract to Wch !ranch (load
404 on the west bounidar? line of the J. Scott 8ut"y;
rocks "*orth %at% the wait 171 of astd tract and of said
survey in ""4h hragobltG l it( of 2i26.47 lent to the
point of basinniA4 and ooetaiains lab. 99 acres of low;
is 3ornb o 60* 0 Mar riau rural' ofl' `MMstf cat i4+q
and use oisisad ion to rl lopsiiat 'TDB lassi !cat on and
use to Jimolt L bt Industrial land use destination under the
cosprahansive sonia$ ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas.
I
BUT121 114
That in approving this plaaaed'daveloposot district ordinance,
the C#y Com"Ll be"Oy approves a prel6iiaary, site plea eboviag
the ieastal 'Oe"doed rlind use vtWit the district. Drior to the
issuance of nay building petiiit for dsvwlopeent within the
district or part thsraof,' a aa+proho"t" sits plan shall be
{ sequirpd to be avls►ittad sad approw4 as part of this ordinance in
f O dines. with Article 410 IX b•topinl, o, the Code of
That prior to issuance of any certificate of ocoupenoy for the
use of any buildims wiUiin the planned dewlopsent district, the
following conditions shall be met;
I.. Specific site plan approval will be required before
building parsiits are issued.
2. This site is restricted to light industrial use only-
no residential land use persittad.
3. All structures will be limited to two stories la
height.
SECTION IV$
That the developwAt of the propertX shall be in substantial
cospliaaee with the site plan attached hereto acid trade a part
hereof for all purposes.
The Zoning Map of the City of O*ntoa, Texas, adopted the
14th day of Janus. ry, -1Q69, as an Apptidiu to the. Code of
Ordinances of ,the City of 060660 Texas under Ordinance mo.
69-10
'he District, Claasssification and Use hereby subject amended to the above conditions
and specifications.
S rLCTL,may
Twat the City'Counoil of the City of Deatoas Toast hereby
Linda that-such chines is it, accordance with a coeprehans'ive
plea for the purpose of pemotio& the' sseasre,l, welfare of the
City cf Denton Taxaao an with reaaonabla conaideration, amizza
other things for the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability' or ppastioulor uses, end with a view to
, protecting human live
coasesv the value of the buildings s
and eneo r tag the most appropriate user of land for t;Y
waxiest benefit to the City of Deatoa, Texas, and its citisens.
1.
f:.
Z-1665/0 WOLSKliPAOt 2
Y
1 n
TbA tl it osd boll N ilk :toll gom 0A4 oft et
irbo#inkoly , ttos its oyo oa4 rorMl, tM sNuitN lic
r,. boobi~i hor9to ot9 ;1NM bal! 1y xhl~ llagaiy ~ lad
C~ ioM 64d tbo Qity C64"Ll of tlao City of 046too, T"" 0
.r •tt~riviaa sus aoRieo tlwrooffi,
!AMMO AND Al'fIWM this th* dq of 1964.
NWIMMT "Alm
CITY OF WO Ms '1 AO
r, ATMT
T~tAs
CI 01
DO=
AtPWM AS TO 1. A~. !CMl1i
g Jtk 0..: "*Us. Cl" ATTOWW
CITY Oy DiM1 0l1~ TRW
by l
iL_tlC♦dCL_
x
r'" ~ Z-I6AS/=D 1i0L8[I/tAOi 3
it '
tL°ST`t .R"i -1?'i~ i V,~ ^r•: .17771 K3'
r
f~. l l
i
1
t ' t a l/ r, V t ~ t♦• a V l l V♦ t t t M t
1"R7 {LRVtr IIOr S
i
_1 mow. I ~ ~
4
M
1i1fr1 ♦aq
~oHw scow wRVSr ♦.Itt~ •
46
i
f
I r
'fit f
F 1
I
t I
i
f o u l 0
A
n
r n
1 Ice
i
'A 'rot
"'F- 77717"~ 7`7'
S t K ' _
r
j
i
t+ffyot'DL'w", TZlCAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DUNTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
N MURA>NDUM
DATE: September 26, 1964
TO.$ Betty Ko>Kean, Assistant City Manager 1
?ROK: Ann Biam"n, Program Administrator
SLWXCT CONTINUATION OF htMVATION OF CITY HULL
in order to Proofed With Phase III of"i:he renovation of city
H1411f I would like to request that the ordinancos' Optpving
ih4*04hdaat,Contradtorla Agreeme~ats with Jerry wri~ht, Space
P144hor, dbrry Prederick, Construction superintendent, and
Richard Cooper, Mechanical Engineer be placed on the City
Council agenda for considerAtion.
Ann Singman
ar
Attachments
01241
ni t'"'uw,."'T'T"PvT'~*'PN_.-''~'?
'
AV
NO. ,
AN ORDINANCE or THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS AUTHORISING AN A
MENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SPADE PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE 'iENOV ION
PROJKCTS• OF THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Counci, of the City of Denton is desirous of
renovating portions of the Municipal Building; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton wishes to retain the services of
Jerry Wright as a donsultgnt for professional apace planning
services to complete the renovation work; and
liF1F:R"So Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shalt
be by ordinance; NOW, TPICASPOAX
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDA1NSt
SECTION I.
That the Mayor and City Secratary are hereby authorised and
directed to execute and attest, respectively, the agreesent
between Jerre Wright, as a consultant for professional space
planning services, and the City of Denton in reference to certain
renovation work to a portion of the Municipal Building under the
terms and conditions being contained in said agreement which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 11,
That Chia ordinance shtrll become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of October, 1984.
KIM0 0, j MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTt
CROW" ALLEN, GM SECRETARY
CITY OF DZIMNO TEXAS
APPROVED AS 'T0. LDGAJ. YORM:
JOE D. MOMIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY or DENTON, TEXAS
By.,
-.ovn.T,w•'~i+p "w;. 7- P:mx.
I
INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT'S AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF T1:XAS 9
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTSt
COUNTY OF DENTON §
The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Home Kul* City situated
in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City," acting herein
by and through its City Manager, and Jerry Wright, hereinafter
called Consultant, hereby mutually agree as follo!4t
1. SERVICES TO 1.1 PERFORMED: City hereby retains Consultant
to perform t:4e hereinafter designated services and Consultant
agrees to perform the following sorvicw
At To provide professional space planaing' services
for the Municipal building kocovation Projects.
2. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONSULTANT: City agrees to pay
consultant for the services performed hereunder aaa follow
A'. An hourly rate of Fifty Dollars (#50.00)) not to
axe *ad a total sum of Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000.00).
B. Dates of Paymantat By monthly invoice.
3. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITYi It is mutually understood
and agreed by and between City and Consultant that Consultant is
an independent Contractor and Shall not be deemed to be or con-
sidered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas, for the purposes
of income tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or
sick leave benefits, or any other City employee benefit. The
City shall not have supervision and control of Consultant or any
employee of Consultant, but it is expressly understood that
Consultant shall perform the services hereunder at the direction
of and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of
Denton or his designee under this agreement.
4. SOURCE OF FUNDS.i All payments to Consultant under this
agreement are to be'pafd by the City from funds appropriated by
the City Council for such purposes in the Budget of the City of
Denton.
PAGE 1
4. SERVICES ANN SUPPLIES TO BE FURNISHED BY CITY: City agrees
to furnish to Consultant the following services and/or supplies:
A. None.
6. INSURANCE: Consultant shall provids at hie own cost and
expense workmen's compensation insurance, liability insurance,
and all other insurancs necessary to protect Consultant' in the
operation of his business,
7. CANCELLATION: City rosarvos the right w cancel this
Agr.eaent at any time by giving Contractor fouriteen (14) days
w*jtten notice of its intention, to cancel this Agreerent,
9. TW- OF CONTRACTt This Agreowt shall commence on the
2nd day of October, 1984, and and on the 31st day of May, 1985.
EXECUTED this the Ind day of October, 1984.
OITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
RICHARD 0. NTEWT, FGMK
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN; CITY SMETM
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
JOE D. MOR(RIS* ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
BY:-
CONSULTANT
PAGE 2
7
y
i . I~TCS.7,7 `7 'ter '
7 `77V77 7,
F r
i
NO.
AN ORDINANOE OF THE CM OF DENTON, WAS AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT 'TETION
THHE HVROJ T CHUI UIGj AND CTION MA COI.AItINGR0 EFFECTOIVE DATE PROJECTS OF
WHERWA tho Council of the City of Denton is desirous of
renovating portions of the Municipal Building ; and
4 1,
WHEREAS, the City of Denton wishes to retain the services of
Jerry Frederick as a contractor for project construction" manager
to complete the ronovatiar work; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.04 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas requires that every sot of the Council providing for the
expendlrire of funds ')v, for the contracting for indebtedness shall
be by 'r'rdininga; WW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS HER£AY OADAINS1
SECTION 1-.
that the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby authorized and
directed to execute and attest, respectively, the agreement between
Jerry Frederick, as a contractor for project construction manager,
and the City of Denton, providing for renovation work to a portion
of the Municipal Building under the terms and conditions being
contained in said agreement which is attached hereto and made a
part hereof.
SECTION It.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of October, 1904.
, MAY
CITY OF DENTON; TEXAS
ATTEST
CITY OF DEMN9 TEXAS
A1+P1tOVW AS',Zb LEdiA FWH:
JOE D. NOWS,,ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY',' Y~
r
INDEPENDENT COL2 CTOR'S AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF DENTON §
The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Home kule City situeted
in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City", acting heroin
by and through its 'City Manager and Jerry Frederick, hereinafter
called 0ontraotor, hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORM E'sl City hereby retains Contractor
to perform the hereinafter designated services and Contractor
agrees to perform the following servicesi
To serve as Project Construction Manager for Municipal
Building renovation projects as followaf
A. Preparation of all necessary bid documents;
B. Evaluation and recommendations on all bids received;
C. Management and supervision of all work crews and
subcontractors;
D. Scheduling of all project activities;
E. keeping 'complete and detailed records and accounts
for financial management of the project;
F. Development of a critical path schedule for
demolition and construction;
G. Other duties relating to management of the project
as assigned by the City Manager or his designee.
2. COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONTRACTOR: City agrees to pay
Contractor for the services performed hereunder as follows:
A. Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) per forty hour week
not to 'exceed a total sum of Twenty-two Thousand
and No/100 Dollars ($22,000.00);
B. An additional One Hundred' Twenty-Five Dollars
($125.60) per forty hour week as compensation for
use of contractor's private vehicle;
C. Said coos Ipensation to be paid weekly within three
(3) working days of submission of an invoice by
Contractor.
3. SUPERVISION AND CONTROL BY CITY: It is mutually understood
and agreed by and between City and Contractor that Contractor is
an independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or con-
iidered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas for;the purposes
of inoome tax, withholding, social security taxes, vacation or sick
PAGE 1
^T!7 tox....v.-~ '^]RC"yv+~^s sa. .rv;^ :'r-i
leave benefits, worker's compensation, or any other City employee
benefit. The City shall have supervision and control of Contractor
and any employee of Contractor, and it is expressly understood that
Contractor shall perform the services hereunder at the direction of
and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of the City of Denton
or his designee under this agreement.
44 SOURCE OF FUNDS: All payments to Contractor under this
agreement are to be paid by the City from funds appropriated by the
City Council for such purposes in the Budget of the City of Denton.
5. INSURANCE:. Contractor shall provide at his own coat and
expense workman's compensation insurance, liability insurance, and
all other insurance gecessaty to protect Contractor in the
operation of Contractor's business.
6, CANCELLATION: City or Contractor reserves the right to
cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party
fourteen (14) days written notice of its intention to cancel this 1
Agreement.
7. TERM OF CONTRACT: This Agreement shall commence on the
2nd day of October, 1984, and and upon the completion of the
project or the 31st day of May, 1985, whichever occurs earlier,
EXECUTED this 2nd day of October, 1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
RICHARD . MWART, MAYOR
I
ATTEST:
CW=TTE,ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
11
BY:
JERRY FREDERICK, CONTRAC-OR
PAGE 2
r ns~-• --ems-.x.-71 ,177N?"E"'
NO.
AN OK01NANCE OF THE CITY OF DEMON 'tsW AUTH041ZINQ'AN AGREEMENT
FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CON$41, ING ENQ;NEERING SERVICES FOR
THE RENOVATION PROJECTS OF THE HU141A PAL SUILDINO; AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Denton in desirous of
renovating portions of the Municipal building; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton wishes to retain the services of
Richard Cooper to a consultant for mechanical and electrical
engineering services to complete the renovation work; and
NHERZASt Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Taxas requires that every act of the Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness she 11
be by ordinance) NOW, THLROPORE,
THE COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DEMON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby authorized and
directed to execute and attest, respectively, the agreement
between Richard Cooper, as a consultant for mechanical and
electrical engineering services, and the City of Denton, providing
for renovation work to a portion of the Municipal building under
the terms and conditions being contained in said agreement which
is attached hereto and made a kart hereof.
SECTION II.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of October, 1984.
. , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
=tME, =9N, CITY bECIRETARY
CITY OF DBNTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY or DEMON, TEXAS
BYt~ Y11 u2,+ i
'?.'',"~r"`s.tRrr -s°,,Ien.t'_ ,y.,~ .ri~~'°~7,41., ~,A,,,,.,,r,.,~ ] -4t "d` ~,v w~rm*+rtea--r.
INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT'S AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF DENTON §
The City of Denton, Taxas, a Municipal Hom4i Rule City situated
in Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called "City", acting herein
by and through its City Manager and Richard Cooper, hereinafter
called consultant, hereby mutually agree as followsl
1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: City hereby retains Consultant
to perform the hereinafter designated services and Consultant
agrees to perform the following services:
Mstahanic,al/Electrical Vnginearing Services for the 2,438
square feet'of addition to existing west wing structure and the
renovation of the canter main hall area of the Municipal building
as followa:
A4 Preliminary examination of the site 'and review of
existing mechanical and electrical systems;
B. Preparation of engineering drawings, bid, documents and
specifications for HVAC and electric power/ lighting
systems, plumbing systems;
0. Evaluation and recomwendations on mechanical ann
electrical bids received;
D. Electrical and mechanical construction administration
services to include periodic on-site observation of the
work and review of shop drawings and submittals.
2, COMPENSATION TO BE PAID CONTRACTOR: City-o.,,,rees to pay
Consultant for the services performed hereunder as follows:
A. A sum not to exceed Six Thousand and No/100 Dollars
($6,000.00);
B. Said sum for Consultant's services shall be allocated
and paid at the completion of each phase as f^llows:
a Renovation Addition
Preliminary Design Phase $ 788.00 X1,312,00
2 'Construction Documants "
(Drawings 5, Specifications) 900.00 1,SOU~.00
3 Bidding and Negotiation Phase 112100 188.00
4~ Construction Administration Phase 450.00 75,0.00
,llani.mus:Guaranteed Compensation $61000.00
3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES; Services other than those outlined
above will be considered to be additional services and will be
PACE 1
1
c 9 u
7MIT, TT';; .;!gA'AT.thfi''7 ms', m. -,.s,.-;'v+.l•e :ix +W" A!,ii""f " ..u.
-1
i
performed only alter written approval by an authorised represents
tive of the City of Denton: Additional services are defined ass
providing services relative to future Uoilitiee which are not
intended to be constructed as part of this project; revising
drawings and specifications when such revisions are inconsistent
with 'approvals or instructions previously given, and due to causes
beyond the control of the Consultant, preparing aa•buiit drawings;
or providing any services not included in this agreement or not
customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted
engineering practice. Compensation for additional services shall
be hourly based on the following schedule:
K*Oistered Professional Engineer 0'00
Draftsman 2700
Seoretary/Word Prooassor 120:00
NOTE: The following services are specifically excluded (rom'
this agreement and will be considered as additional services if
required:
1) Construction' management services involving preparation of
project schedules;
2) Doti n of plumbing systems for new or renovated restroom
facilities;
3) Design of speciality communiections or data proeeesing j
systems, other than conventional telephone system;
4) Design of specialty electrical or mechanical systems other
than kVAC and electrical power/lighting systems. Xxample-
Pneumatic Tube system such as in new Police Station.
4. SUPERVISION_ AND CUNTROL BY CIT.Y: it is mutually understood
and agreed by and between City and Consultant that Consultant is
an independent Contractor and shall not be deemed to be or consid-
ered an employee of the City of Denton, Texas for the purposes of
income tax, withholding, sncial security taxes, vacation or sick
leave benefits, worker's compensot!.on, or any other City employee
benefit. The City shall not have supervision and control of
Consultant or any employee of Consultant, but it is expressly
understood that Consultant shall perform the services hereunder at
the direction of and to the satisfaction of the City Manager of
the City'of;Denton'or his designee under ''this agreement.
5. KEIMSUKA6ALE E%PZ#6w.S: Reimbursable expenses are in addi-
tion to-total compensation and shall include actual expenditures
PACE 2
37-77777- -7y
,
made by the Consultant in the interest of the project upon prior
approval of the City Manager or his designee. These expailditursa
will typically include the expenses of repro-Wotions, postage and
handling of drawings and speoifications, long distance phone
calls, and out-of-town travel 201 per mile) if required.
6. SOURCE OF FUNDSi. All payments to Consultant under this
agrasmont are to be paid by the City from funds appropriated by
the City Council for suuh purports in the Budget of the City of
Denton.
7. INSURANCE: Consultant shall provlde at his own cost and
expense workmen's componaation insurance`, liability insurance, and
all othow insurance deemed necessary by Consultant to protect
Consultant in the`oparation of Consultant's business.
8. CANCEL, LATIONs City or Consultant reserves the right to
cancel this Agreement at any time by giving the other party
fourteen (14) days writton notice of its intention to cancel this
Agreement; provided, however, the City shall compensate the
consultant for the balance of all unpaid fees earned by him as of
the date of ouch cancellation,
9. TERM or CGNTRAM This Agreement shall commence on the 2nd
day of October, 19840 and and upon the 3lst day of May, 1985.
EXECUTED this the 2nd day of October, 1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
RICHARD 0. STEWARTj MY
I
ATTEST:
MARL TTE O
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
BY.
CONSULTANT
COOPER, KT=D E7
PACE 3
7-1
Cl yoi "NI"^ MX" MUNICIPAL BUILD(NG ~ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE 017) 566.8200
MEMO
DATE: September 14, 1984
TO Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM Chief Gentry, Flre Department
RE; Ordinance of Setting Fees For Inspections and Permits
We have chosen' to present this ordinance to provide a fee structure to be
used In the fire safety inspection and permit program. This ordinance is
the companion of the 1982 Uniform Fire Code.
Attached to this memo lawn ordinance that is enacting as a part of new
Article 1 of Chapter 10 to provide for setting Inspection and permit fees.
I
I
ck entry, Ire C e
JG lec
a, ,r I
i
NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS SETTING INSPECTION AND
POKIT FEES AS PROVIDED FOR OV AATIC4E Ic CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DEKONo TEXAS REPEALING ALL ORDI-
NANCES IN CONFLICT HERFWITH1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN' EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF UENTON, TEXASi HEREBY ORDAIM
$CCTION 1,
That the fire safer;, inspection fees and permit fees provided
for in Section 10-4 of Article I of Chapter 10 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas are hereby set in the
foliowing amountsc
1, Building Fire Safety inspection feea provided for in
section 10-4(6)1
Interior Square Footage F±•
0 to 6,000 1500
over 6,oo0 to 12,009 30.00
over 12x000 to 24,000 60,00
over 241000 100.00
2. Permit Fees for Fire Safety Systems and Storage Tanks
provided for in section 10-4(b)c
(a) automatic fire extinguishing systems $ 50,00
(b) fir-a protection sprinkler systems $0.00
(c) fire detection and alarm systems 50.00
(d) gasoline or LPG tanks 50.00
(e) standpipe systems 50.00
3. Permit Fees provided for in section 10-4(c). Fees
for all permits required for all businesses or
activities required under Section 4,101, of the UFC,
(being the enumerated activities and businesses 1
through 46 therein), shall be $25.00 per permit
except as otherwise specified herein as followsc
(a) The permit tee for 02. Repair hangers01 012. Dry
cleaning plants") 113. Dust producing operations"1
021. oariges01 •24. High-riled Combustible atock"1
038. Places of ass*%being") "44. Tire recapping"
and 045. Waste material handling plants" shall
piny a permit fee based on square footage as pro-
vided for in building fire safety inspection fees
set out in 1, above.
(b) The permit fee for 06. Burning in public place"
or 04. Bonfires or rubbish fires" shall be $50.00
per day.
(c) The permit ,~'ee . far 1116. Plasm Able or combustible
S liquids ar',tsnkr, ;hd 026. Hquified pettolbum
gases" shall be $50.00.
{
PAGE 1
rTi'T F. ~T'I t1g`^
4 1\ .77
J t 1 1r 1 1J rl r J
1110-
1
1
SECTION II.
All ordinances or parts of ordinanoes in faros when the pro-
visions of this ordinance beeomo effective which are inconsistent
or in conflict with the terms or provisicno contained In this
ordinance are hereby repealer to the extent of any such conflict.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1904.
RICHAD 0. , MAYOR
CITY OF DENTONt TEXAS
ATTEST;
CHARLOTTE ALLEN,
CITY SECRET ARY
CITY OF OENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOW
JOE D. MORRISr ACTING CITY ATTORNSY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY;
PAGE 2
a f •i. J'h. Jd'°tl, .J Sul ~7JV..f_.x,z_I~ i ro b'
xS;'n^9Rw ~tp'+~rg.n.. fi~rtw~~ crv m . ..9ra3(-ii~yn .,~.~vr .-t nwq .r,n + s~
4ctaber 2, 1984
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1TBM
SU13J13C1`:
Consider Abandonment and Quit Claim of an Unused Easement
on Property `Northeast of 1-35 and Prairie f,t, (Near
Proposed Mill Run Apartments)
SUMMARY ;
'rho property owner has requested that the unused easement
be quit claimed in order to construct Mill Run Apartments.
The request has been approved by the Development Review
committee in their JOne 5, M4, meeting and by the Public
Utilities Board at their meeting of July 24, 1984. 1
FISCAL SUMMMY;
{
Not applicable.
ACTIuN RINUikgll;
City Council approval or disapproval subject easement quit
claim.
4 ALTERNATI VhS
Deny request.
RECOMMENDATION O
The Development Review Committee in their June S 1984,
~
meeting and the Public Utilities Board at their meeting of
July 24, 1984 recommended to the City Council approval of
subject request.
Respectfully,
I /x
R. H. Nelson
Director of Utilities
I
EXHIBIT I Location Map
II M,inuuies- Development Review Committee-June 5, 1984
111 Warranty Deed with Vendor's Lien
IV Unrecorded original easement
V Minutes PUB Meeting of 7/24/84
Vi Resr:iution Abandoning Basement
3zl6U:1
F~
1
c
u.
ty, , Minuos
Dovelopeent Reviow Committeo
June S, 1984
p
DRC Members Present: Jackie Doylo, David Ellison Wayne Horsley, Don
McLaughlin, Koorosh 'Qlyat, Pommy Stone, James
Johnson Tex Stewart, David Ham, and Harlan
JeFFers~n
Pngineer Represen-
tative Present: Jim Reiser
1, Review"of quitclaim request of Mill Run Easement
A. Engineering
Recommend quitclaim
Water, and Sewer
Recommend` quitclaim
C. Electric
r Recommend quitclaim
Building Inspection
Recommend quitclaim
E. Transportation Engineering
Recommend quitclaim
F. Fire
Recommend quitclaim
G. Parks and Recreation
Recommend quitclaim
H. Lone Star Gas
Recommend quitclaim
R
Y~
"1 v rp :9 l 1.1{: F yA.'p
w6
k iMi~au~A~ '
Ooveiopment Review Co"ittee
1l un Usemo:nt
no 1984
Page Two
I, G.T.A,
Recommend quitclaim
J. Cox Cable
Recommend quitclaim
K, Planning and Community Development
Recommend quitclaim, Contact Don McLaugghlin ('566.8246)
for information on process from th.ts point. {Public
Utility Board and City Council approval required)
I
r
I
~f
I
0010a
u
ue `d
T, -7771- r
8 C NSi AN114 S VIG S NT C? 64A Alt
VgArEM 2M.- _Mir
Nelson opentd discussion on thin item by covering the The
r alteriiatives or compensation to Slack and Ve,atca,
Staff recommends labor rate time 1.85 with not-to-exceed,
exniblt 111 $241,000 design and $100,000 res. engineer.
Out-of-pocket is direct without multiplier,
Contract has a maximum of 51 salary escalation per year and
includes $10,000 For additional FERC licensing. Project
will be funded by bond funds. Boyd questioned this,
desiring to wait until the bond funds are available,
The Board expressed a desire to visit with Black and Veatch
prior to approval of the pproposed engineering contract. No
definite dates were established at this time for such a
field visit. No further action taken,
At this point, Edward Coomes left the meeting (8:1S AM) to
teach class.
6. CONSIDER QUITCLAIM Or MILL RUN BASENSENT:
The property owner nas requested that the unused easement
be quitclaimed in order to construct Mill Run Apartments.
The request has been approved by the Development Review
Committee in their June 5, 1984, meeting.
I? After a briee discussion, Herring made a motion to
recommend to the City Council approval of the abandonment
and quitclaim of the Mill Run easement, second by Thompson,
4 ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
7. CONSIDER PROPOSED OVERSIZE AGREEMENT WITH JOE BELEW FOR A
N' WATER IN ON- IS PROPERTY M N R DRIVE ALONG
LOCUS STREET TO UC L LANE:
David Hasa presented this item to the Board representing
3,b50' of proposed 12" water line on North Locust. The
Hogan and Rasor Study shows an 18" line would be required.
However, there is presently a 1211 line on the other side of
the street, and rather than putting in an 18" line, the
staff has determined that the existing 12" line plus the
proposed 12" line will give sufficient capacity to equate
to an 18" line. To oversize subject line from 8" to 1211,
using existing bond funds, would cost the City $29,200.
t
Mr. Joe Belew is developing housing units adjacent to north
Locust Street. The Utility Staff is desirous' to
participate in oversizing the 8" waterline which will serve
his development with a i2" water transmission main in
keeping with the Hogan and Rasor Study to improve water
k service throughout the City,
WNVrES PUB 7/24/84
i
c v! c Ju t + J P r..~ T`t t<7l0. l~f as .q i'~i
.i2hL_u ua"'.:'s1 sS. ic' i3j i'sal~~i4b,Yl~uk'.`~~i, aivu • '
I
A111t RIN A11118)offo s
w
P i f'A"E. 61f N I v,/ n
.u f r
In Iu ,weni>'aru
~s
z
PRAIRIE
.
-ip i~urdqu+rJ .JTW _ rw 'YVVU~aeriurt UL CAII I Mio fir ri.+uif/U. u w lYl[A MILL RUN Af~ARi-wN7s
rMnwN xr n f ON T9Xi . BASEMENT AOANM)
F-a
~ F
r1
MILL RON kommoEM'S
w
a' casc~N r
10 BE ABMWOt10 fn ~
W_
Z ,
z ;
o '
m
S
PRAIRIE
W e. so. ACCr. Mo. wealuo rr ptWeMIM' D[f'M1~NlYI'f 4w Puf m NfINT WLL AMOTMENT$
oe~w~ J1. Iw. : w MT9 CITY 60 raw*". Tsi x" EMDAENY' Ab'ANO D
,wR"°.'~?T~~IIT"' im+~.s- rrrc +.vrlS?5"'R{iPra;.wati m.rra,r frt'y3.nTi£r l'ir ~y i°~ J ~ r,~~ r~ .
t 1rtlKpM OatNMal~4rOC
1 PniaPSd b 1M OW IN 40 Ywt let ew ►r 14w/" µr AOV**
1 nn•~ rr!2 t.l't{. I1.vMMl,n iaalMde Mwe4't WdteN lNt µ14, ACS! 1,1,4
waR *rY n U's DORI$ r. t
t rlIa STAra or T VAS IIRu,.
COUNTY OF plNTON
Vial Qnlq Catheum Inteepelses, Ine„ ♦ 10446 Co"fatlM
1+ Of the Cnunty of Dallas and Stan of Tawas for and io
t'Ms%1dMti6n nl the 1091 Of TM and A61 1104 ....«•••~~r••~~»•.........
'
DOLLARS
and Whit valuable ConeWMlion to the )uadontgned pow Dy the ¢nwte h&mIn natntJ, t44 welipt of which
ncml,v nCFnowl¢t-N. MJ the lvmhor mmkI rotim of the ewsoullon {nd dtllvtey by CefinNf of
Itt on8 Cortaln f+rerilson, Neto of *Ytn data hfrlfwi!h In tha'prlmolrol IUR of two Mwicn
rune hundrod and 1WMty flea thr!usanq Ylve hurtdrr! dflfars (lit M. ¢001, psyllow to
"nt LrOtr of Ye"On Sdvings and LNn AsSetutlen. ► TIM Slvinq► +tnd Lan APlnCiatlen,
m its 001:6 im the Clty of Vernon, WllbargqM County, T4941, 40 thereln pro,/idQd {nd
pwlmq Intee"t at tho `stfs theriln. spetlffod amd onY!dlnQ for 1C101erat+on of matur!ty E
16 event of default snd for attorney's YNs;
l
I
1
t
t
s
A.) Y0 14t h wt j..t ,m [ho low"I.Lan sC,:Ih'
:at'Id A 1'iA~thort3lQ
ra..
i
,"4..E T7n tl..L4'!14}, `C.r ! r!%PT CO •nr rn ,r7n, 1v: ~lCt lh! ^:SC~:J: ",)''1Q'Q'nir.1!
rJ^A,.
trn
S!4 1 1'.74"'4" ~artt0 MC !C ^L S1QG `!"i+••:' r7• L "aef.
Apr I
r
1
t:~~''!E1",~ j.,. ~.r-,:..-- we p"C'~v<<•I r ,a l'3~'.~°~F°`':~ °5 'f"*P!7';~7f4W:5."Ik°'~'':°.,Y."''gFS';~'."g5n41 'f'].".°i^-.A~i,~i:Y9!'?;PHS" "n,•Y"'Ar!'
.
y,
TUC •a"
t 4l:Sia 4 tr4tt at tand situated In the it t40414M
sur §;y AM$%r4tt M, 44A%go OwtyY, :t944, and '04ia9 part
} at 4 ilrst ;raft rowtot lh "'44 ao 437, ?4q* 4$4, Data
i ioto4dsl mal pats of 4 Idssiul :0441 41 tooordod in 'volume
f 444, too. 441, D4sal of Rottrds, Oor%w County. :oKa4, "t
hokal mtrt 04rt44u14r1v 4464rl4od 44 tel:0wol
1 sla: 2NOS as s *tool 40snet peel n46t s tense 4orhor
4e ahe ?iet141e44t aerher at the 2.726 Attu traot 4eetri4e42 la
value* 4#40 0440 442 D4et Records, Slen14n 440un:y, OX&S ;
r '.K2::3L sdu4h C dotrooo :1 Alnuto4 At sotonas Wost $24.0
tsa: t4 an lren red on the North ;lnd at tr41r1s streotf
! :HIaCi scuts It ds4reeo 3s minutss 04 8e44ndo usst vith
Ut Noe::+ eaph:•4t•w4y at 14.4.4 1trN4 6.26.s$ ':«.1 to 4 lexa1
$:4te K:4ns+4y mOnu1<ent,. 4413 :en46. 1%448 H1Q~~'«a'r
ao:mq LA tae 940% rirht•tf-W4 :n4 of inwO14:e K:v~'•'ay
_ NO, 33.40 retorted In 1414me 143, tale 31:1 0
40t 1te4erdl Of
aena4ti Ceuni'/,o+ies;
` :3t! 3! Ndr'ih'ss 4wross 44 mmtol $3 Io44ado west
73,25 Sena lo:lou:nQ uo. tast A..2.w. at gold ;,K, 713, to 4n
i lren rod for>e4rnarf
:'tY:,:X t70sth 00 OdQSOat +L4e 47 $so n41 L41: ~
6:7,13 30at44 4n lron red tsr 4ornlr, s41d :ran rod 'aa:n=
lr. :ha ::ar:~ 11tre of.la~d,1::.,Atr4_;r4t1 44 r4o1rd4as.;A
~'e;ar♦ 41, taro 211, 310t aetsrds, ~eatam 40'.4nty. SA441
tauth 34 4e4sots :3 .%mit4s 31 1040 40 X4$:
.36.10 toot 91:lsw:n4 umo ,vart 11n0 of ssta /4 4ar+ 4rac:
j :a sa. tCi;' S! It~:;3t:Ya, an: :or,tu:: ; :33, S.1,43 a~.bre
fee: or 3.063 44r41 at land.
I
,
1 t1
1
1
i
i~~v.
_7 IrT1W
1, p air 'P
AFT, 1 1, r;77
i ~ Ytrl o f 11x r~ I
i
SS:.44 a tlraq% of land oit4atdd In Rhe ! Pueha4ki
lurveY, Nla4rasL 994, 7fnaoa Caurisy, :sn4s, and being A4rL
Ye~lu+aeinl7 i49e 4!4 Rent
rifirri~sDonton Ceuniyaeleesxl a,n i
dfafrib4d as 1e/1eYai Dar-,ielilarly
C4P~!S;tC;~O 41 4 4110e1 oarnfr "$I near a (onto OorR4r ~
aL ;.yo .4orthf4st Berner of a 2.7;1 4ere Irae% rooordod in
Yolume 446, Pagf 49, D4f4 1a4arfi4, 04AW court}-, :aKaal
w.ltS;4S Forth as degT0411 13 minutes 29 tfooRde Foot,
2!l,4C (of, follouino :ho uorzl
rfCOrdfd •A L'C lCmf 43, ?age ,',41 1e' .14 of a 44 atra Iraq%
:fntOnC0Y1SL", :!flat , Of Me D.04 RaCOTdO 0:
40.1 :.,Qt + Ls an iron red be4 n4 wto 9r
b:1,lf iiol %a ma iran•i doter feriirq 64*1
In :Is S644 nim-ofo.44y ...no of :Rtarot4ia 4.1 *hsay ti0.
as rooorded in L'ol\fmo $43, 'Pave 212, Z4od Roatrla, 24.`.t?R
Coeaty, vxas;
:XV11 ,ti'4M dagrasa 44 min
wit** !2 aNeRdf want
.ovlfi
137.04 feet (al' q s.1a t4at x. W. of'34i9 :,:l, No,
a ;4Ka4 s.aa4.t:gAVaY MOrtumeRLf 2S as E
i . 4
:Nt .i ~orL 24 dogroaa 21'r,inu:aa
.tallowtaq :Aa !as: ooepana wea:
a :ovai S-aia :;.r1'~ay mor". ant; i' tall ]S
:H3`H= !'or:h 34 d4gr►u 34 ai-v as !3 soeoRda ''rat:
4n•s:aR•¢t% i4::euir5q th4 tar, t.:,W a( Laic •.;i. ;s. )S :b
OY Corner, 8444 i:.n rod bai Rq i~ti:8a lrOr::S
'--no of 14id 84 4ere tract;
36• ;YlYCt 30%A-4h 44 dagrffo 1.1 unutoo 49 00eonds tas:
.1,, loot 10.4avinq the Nor:h lino of laid ::Add :5 ::,a
Or x272}".:3C And con-airing 7144.84 sri.;4:o :tr. s:
2,isi 4a:u e: i4aC,
I
i
i
t
t
I
` ~ t ~lr~ X i .4''11 7RRT°t ~ f b" ~ ~J ~i ' S'^I l "4•~, ei•- r~
1
1, I
"{other %WA td~ aeN ~{!>4N1 s moony o"iert111 oe Poloist oorw, eM 4u 4101e Mid
Ir 1Ae taaweret~nll In a(r to Ntd 404
TO u7x At;: "3 iw W►te 4444 {rrorAss, 4644 44*" does r1~. AR, %00404? 440 411 04
,
{ln~ttler %A* :tea, rWt$, 44"tteo, tittle 4M eete4e to 0414 r'N44 tft4u 44erf 4400r4{or,ee4
44f1!y the POYS40t Met Hl, Jr OVOPIOteei sea tM WMOtet" "OPPOSely 44veoMt{ ahft Ill pay,
'IMAt{, OPFHN`4,'10 OrMlt4, SO whoa 4ett.Mte Or ANee Iter ee fntttiel, d4 4000ar On MO UtK;
SAf NOf',
'At{ tr4aJter %I %Ne rttAO4t reeetlree 4A tAo u04404L40444
+{04"104 IAts %06 a*%A 4er of Mcu►t A. 4. 1911,
Aueftl +e::4 1. 41.0 NOM4440 1AV444MAt ':4rporJttaA
Terp: {+711• Fre Ot4oM1t
A44494401 +eoreter;/ AoY L.
.irP, Je 1:.
taO '1A4*"t1AM llanoll CM1 .Lit 48y' 34rI4 r.t::Y IDPle rea .Y C;r
wrf:4, 1SCO •DrHiaf.tt Ot ROrl ~4Re :AYe{Wont :OrpOMti3ni ko'..1. CO ri1 ii if tR/ 2erf4n.
.:.e4f r,J+4 a ►useorstt,a :c tA{ lor4tetnJ :AItn+Aea: 4,ti JcNaa,t.:;~4 Se rf tlr:Af I~,JOUt4~
SIR. 44 tnf 141 4au 4404 a: {4w '{snorts{), tir :i,1 prrpow{ {r,c 4:a{13fr4u4n two..'. 4x•
er.eil4 Ors :ae 44w.tY treretA 0%&M,
iy i1•fi.' .L3er my oan3 4A3 {e{: oc 4MOO N.IJ 21:4 047 4:
1' !'arpret :rradre.4, :,4trrt 1-44:11 :L 4s:
for .4.:u :aunt 141"
A, J4 rotCt, .:IrR rL'; .44m
.ent:r..ou::y :e►JJ
ta2:•1 an. n.• sC
...I•-:' :r :~r.:a t rs,c4 tL: ~,{I: ar -asst !Aiea:,-a:
AJ: ••.JR iJrIL:• y4t:Of Jn4 •1i1, ''.A JI'. da', :0:/ ..:fir .4:.,:7„
{ .:a :ox4f for at.::r. ^.en4iyOrtet:r et u,{ 1.1 4.1, ?We* :a1A at :.✓3n: ur :nru
t:. .G::Irl, :l. P.1 r.: pOl3 lY 'w. 46s.1 714., '1A a:.. ..:A
A,IY4 ;rInt44, •4:3 4L ..:0.'tly O:, 1.. .•.f// , rfl1,•... .rf.'..,
NXII ...4 . 'Y•• •f!.... 3tr :f:ll
i
4C :Ira... :r{:t 1r:4. :t .411. ►:..J:4. :r. ...4 a ,
i•1 .f: 1 ar. v6 t. {:rf Of .:f tJ .f Jf.:1 . ~4 k'; !:.:1r
.1'. :1; r 1f.. ri: ir31: s: 1.1 ....:140 .Ir. •.1 .v.'....
...S rl•. ...'.q ..rl :1.':1:.:1: n/I:r/1a: I► ...1.
r1 L..1 r4 Or,.,... ...rrr . •1 t .,'.i'..
777
THOU 04 IIU 464 to ~ !w#iH to tM loom, 11M4 0 tr44M0 406'"I
` "tliW09 Net v}th 100000 1464 Of ►ralro4 Ure4t, 100 CO" to th4 r14440 et 14~144L}~,
`tookat" 1,04 4"00 of 1444, 00" w 4641
N hAV4 A44 ;O NOW tn4 41#044 4004riaea pre#4t01. tot4tner with 4:; aeu uryu64r, tn.
f'{ MIMI 4914 t►PW't404409t W 6M46 to 4AyWN 4410ndihd 'Jn%d th4 NW J44t• of t4Ye, ttl IY4a•
k 4460rt 444 0a411M4(Mverl 444 w e4 h4re4y tint our Aetrl, f9e40Nr4 0A 641144tetrft4H, IC
} ♦amot 444 reroV4 41 4rd sLwa4r the sal4 pr4Rlsds W40 ih1 sw hits of Teaat, t:4 Out.
4e40r1 444 Net1114, 444lnot every per$" rhe4sofgr .40Ju111' 4:4141114, or 14 4:41a :as fame,
4e any part therset,
41tA*" allrnaAlo 44 "Mon, '4a4o thin 19411 44 of i4ptf4aar A. v, 1934.
►ottfr
~ =t ry Of JdliiCiii I Jsy} .l► b,'il, "Ura 11# 4M4rs4nl 4 I,ata% Yl'a: t0, :A ml for ~eL:411 Div:
74x&11, 011 %Al4 41) pfra0n4 1:1 avto4ro4 A. C. ?Otter Rr.J+n :4 ae to o4 tA4 Ff,1011 rr Ct4 r.aSa
it4sorlooa to Lao ;4rer,Qle4 :nltru40At. 444 aCxnow;f 061 :4 5e :,14t M 4A000ki %.,,4 Ile
tnf pwposss 4114 401111 ldaMtlOn tMfein 4xpre0se4.
::ton 7n4nr a'i •Un5 4112 sea: 4c 0.01,:4, 34Y 40
.4Crs :N Anderson, i•: t4r1" .u: tl,
i,_ Seal :fntan +ewi+','Ix44
C? Sa63
:f• rtofN Sn, 1 1•a :a ry' :r. rl:
or. :Ril Siy `srso LS::: svpearod J:fgloi:
34 :Q D4 tr,s ier44A •rl444 'IGI :1 tu41ari44j.:5 / : ojl(.Ctr•t :'.itrlu^L, 1,,:. '.1 M1; :11L 444•
u r.fd c! it el 4;at% rAr Salts r.2, 4
L4 •.1 r.:j .r.~ o4as /,,1,41:.1# '..r,
i
aai: Ja }'Le:: ^1:1,40• ?:L:/r 1:.:,;4 ~ifC dso J'«•'. .".7: r:RAt: L4 1/ :Jr4Lt 114
SWC, 7G:
31::494 tl./ A11 1:i:n4C .L1. sa^1 ;:r Sbrtt lfl .:.`141,1 N:.'1~.
.1#1112, "4 :rit tAf t:4 Al" ,UA :0 r1 atY it.
::vfR uor Z, -.8r.: Ina Jla:
4441, :fL: a, :.d•:.'I ;1x41
AL:LGSi.:, lion. •;tn ;iS' at :v::3
.1 ..^~,dl :oar
•Y• I :...ll 1.. Sri, •~.Lit
,I.Jt +f, 1.'.1 tri
. ..r3:.14...x. .f./ J.. 4: :fL irJl 1 i.. 1.
,......l:.frvc; a::.. •.I a ..r.r :Irt::;r
•!?T"'~"" m'sT'SQW: `.aw'~!T:z-..a-...,. ,r. y t °'F"'s.R.,".T,^'-w,.
. w r~wJ.•••.•r e}y~,/r '~IIIMIMbM~ll~~~! ` .lw. rf f ~ 1t A.•~,Iq ~ r
V,, r.•~.,Y ILi t • ~♦Z r,F~i,M^. ry 1
•_Y,.wW wr ,w..rr
.14 nr, 17. .r of;er and .es., fONO, o, c: aad
3C't:=A^9Li01 OS' L1i CLiw, 00 C:•C Oi~4T :C tit n4k.O :ne C! Dortloni '#XAs,
a 1:'x':3, :^f '1M d; G~1:L07 v0:./`:', •CXYC, T7:Q:^t "A: Sty S~ :lfrlb;r u4::ltr:e G~04
AY .1 .l' nr, .r• . .r.~ ..1 ^~.a f ° aT~'~ •C •.Lu•.3.
•P"Cj. "e e G v Z r,l: V r• C. L!. , .3:'GC, :'-7 CC.
i .-'t:.... `:••`st.m;,~~' .,w»:•::.»., as e:,eot::: ::,i trr.e: ::rr r., ':~e~ ~:,d
! :+r..:r. so:::
. f.: is " r •i.~ ~x~ew e' f.i ~::t'x~l.i i'x:"~'eH la~ :e::r ea-ri: } semC wM~i
r' ,t .....i v •r«°e 3':T:.:1 .a'.' ~ •i: a: r .C... , C::;
.l_
14 j.
i'
i
~ I
VU L HUN ARANI'A1fNl'S'
ll! i
lu CA%MINI
ru uc AI k", 04 u
4!
U
' ~ n1
1
PRAIRIE
W.'0. NO A~CI HO fNiION{O ~Y_ A7VIAIONI-Wy r
it
{IlMAg1Ml'!It OP /'4i1LIC UlNItlt•MILL RUN Af A'A WNTS
wAwN 1TW Nu iv nAV~ ClrV O D00014, TUXAS
_ . µ y Al YNIU IIY EASEMENT A0 ANtxx n
./.c+ W s1
AN ORDINANCE P90VIDINO FOR THE A~;tNDVNM=NT OF A UTILITY CASEMENT
WITHIN THE CITY OC DENTON AND AUTNQAIxINO THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A
QUITCLAIM DEED CONVEYING ALL AXONTs TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE
CITY IN SAID SABENtNT TO THE OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED
BY SAID EhSEMENT) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE*
V;0ZREAS0 the city council of the City of Denton, acting
pt.rsuant to law, and upon the request and petition of the
grantee herein, deems it advisable to abandon and convey the
nereinafter deacrinod tract of land to grantee and is of the
opinion that sold utility ea$*Mont is not needed tot public utie,
and that sable should tie abandoned and quitclaimed to the state
Of Texas and Thomason Properties, Inc., a Texas Corporation, as
hereinafter proVidedi and
WHERBASe the City Council Ot .,tne City Of Denton is of the
opinion that the best interest and welfare of the publio will be
served by abandoning and conveying the *am to the State of
Texas and ThOWAson PCOPOtties, Inc., a Texas Corporation, for
the OOnsideratian hereinafter More fully set forthl now,
.therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CUUNCIL OF TNC CITY OF DENTONi
$ECTIO> 11
That the following described tract of land in the City of
Denton WM and th,~ same to hereby abandoned, vacated, and Closes
insofar its the right, title and easement of the putilic ate
concernedt
For point of beginning onlyt BEGIN at a point on the north
boundary line of West Prairie Street and the west boundary line
of Avenue I in the City of Denton, TekaSr
THENCE north 211 feet to a point for corner)
THENCE West 745 feet to a power pole itt place for said point of
beyinninyt
THENCE sOUtn 18 degrees 36 minutes 20-seconds west 262 teet to a
point on the north boundary line of a tract of lane conveyea by
W6Vo4 potter and wtfa to the M. P. M. Combination Haw Machinery
Company. Inc: 1
SECTION It.
That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby &UthOtOod to
execute and deliver that certain gUitciaiM deed attached nereto
and incorporated herein convoying said utility easement
described therein to the State of Texas and Tho"dOn'Propertiest
inc., a Texas Corporation.
SECTION III.
That portion of the public utility easement herein desoeibed
being Vacated, 'abandoned, and closed is made subject to all
existing zoning regulations and deed restrictions, if any, and
subject to all existing easement rights of others, if any,
Whether apparent or not.
MILL RUN APARTKXATS/PA0Z 1
Y
n,_~ M,i9.s~q~+~ 5°I,^s ~y j e u ^~^n""T f r r T'S,nt ~ . ~ertn35:4Ws`~j`np~'~ ~r'S14. c l
This Ordinance shall take 0 fact and be in full force and
eff^ot from and after the date of its passage, and it is so
ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of
Dentun, TeK4e1,this the day of , 1984%
RICHARD 0. STZWARTt MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTE.ST&
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, MY SZCKEThAY
CITY OR DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TU LEGAL CORMi
JOE D. MU"I5, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON# TEXP3
NYs S
i
MILL RUN APARTMENTS/PAGE 2
r4ok The city of tioatoa,~ Texas0 a Outtoipal Corporatioa
ofl W 0"* At Deatoa ad I" of Texas f oW Is sommiWa Mr of
the ea:r~ at ....'....MMwY1V............M w Vr www 1
.w..«.._.....kiN AND NO/100 010.00)►►..w-...►...r...___w..._n---- 001i' m
and ol,her seed and valuable consideration
to it iAMOAMM!y The State of Texas and Thomason Properties, Inc,,
o the at♦ ~oerpora t ioDenton WW 8tofs of Texas , tlw "000 At WAM
Is hsMy offaokaowMdged, do. Ly tows ptwsats. BARGAIN, SILL. RIILM" A" rOl<iV'1tM
,
QUIT CI.UX Sato tM said The State of Texas and Thomason Properties, the,
a Texas Corporation, their successors and assigns
k*mMm* YNiglal &U its AIM *4 and Wave in sad be that esrtaG bvA ar Mrs
eel Of land bias is NM Coasts Of Denton W State of Tessa, 4w AW so 10 A.
WWK t
For the point of beginning only; OMI N at a point on the north boundary
line of Vost Prairie street and the west boundary line of Avenue I in the
City of Denton,' TexAS;
TItNCB north 911 feet to a'point for corner;
THENCE west 745 foot to a power pole In place for said point of beginning;
THENCE south 18 degrees 30 minutes 20 seconds west 262 feet to a point
on the north boundary line of a traot of land oooveyed by N, C, potter
and wife tothe M. P. M, Combination Saw Machinery Company, too,
TO SAVS AIM 10,3100 W raid Peswillr, tesstlwt with Nh asd W%gWw *A li$Mo seism
loges and mess Hassle Is any s wow Wmy mob the aaM The State of Texas
and Thomason Properties, Ion„ a Texas Corporation, their successors
hlliwwid Almelo, bteowo w that "l{iwp t►s said
City of Denton, Texas, a hhnnicipal Corporation, its successors
aw is-if is, r310 esas W1 ~ewe *Wesbr l edw It 44 st nay On* Mestler,
haw, 4aim or demand any right or tltb to t1o 60MOM VkAwm a or SOPWsweness, or my PW dole.
of.
Wr1!KM Wad at Denton, Texas this
dar of A. D.19 84
Wthwom at Ryswt of *net w In tTtr flip DENTON, TEX"
ATTEST. BY;
WHIO 0. MUFF, MM
October 2, 1994
CITY COUNCIL AGEAA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider Contract With Freese & Nichols, Inc., for Sewer
Collection System Master Plan Update
SUMMARY.,
The Sewer Collection System Master Plan was last updated in
1974in conjunction with the Facilities Plan for the Sewer
Treatment lent and interceptor sewer lines. Due to
substantial growth of the City over the past 10 years, it
is necessary to develop another Master Plan for the Sewer
Collection System.
The Staff has worked with Freese Nichols, Inc., in
developing a contract and Scope of Services for this
study. The main points of the contract are:
Determine all drainage basins out to limits of
extraterritoria: jurisdiction of City of Denton.
Calculate sewage flows to be expected from these
drainage basins as per projected population and zoning
of each basin.
- Determine line sizes of sewer lines 12" and above and
where lift stations will be required.
- Prepare a projected capital improvements program for
the next five years (1990) of the most urgently needed
improvements with estimated costs.
Make presentation to Public Utilities Board, Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council.
A committee consisting of Utility Staff, Punning Staff and
City Engineering Staff will coordinate the work as it
progresses. 'The City's Master Plan and Development Guide
will serve as guidelines for the Sewer Master Plan.
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Proposed Freese & Nichols, Inc., Contract not-to-exceed
$50,000.
Source of Funds: Current Revenue- 620-008-0450-8502
5216U:4
ACTION RONOWIRED t
Ap'prove or disapprove Sewer Collection System Muter Plan
contract with Freese & Nichols, Ina.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their n,eating of September
19 1984, recommended that the City Counoil approve a Sewer
Co'ilection Syatmo, Master Plan contract with Freese &
Nichols, Ino., in an amount not-to-exceed $50,040.
Respectfully,
E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Proposed,Freeee & Nichols Contract
II Minutes PUB Meeting of 9/19/84
3Z16U:5
s
T
WTrTM" 7Herz. •,ca+H. !q -t;. ry <<r., ...:."tti`', yyx-y`x of .r~''' n<,_
i
NOS
AN CRDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT 89TV90 THE CITY, OF DRt1'M
AND M10% AND NICHOLS, INC,' FOR ENGINt ING $OVICES > IN
CONNECTION WITH THE 44MOPMENT OF A MASTER PLAN FOR THE FUTURE
DEVELOP OF THE CITY'S WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM, AND
PROVIDE ra AN EFt'ECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it is in the beat interest of the City Of Denton
to develop a master plan for the future development of the
City's wastewater collection $Yates; and
WHEREAS, the city staff and Public Utilities Board has
recommended tt:at Freese and Nichols, Inc., consulting engineers,
be retained to undertake the necessary investigations and
studies to develop the caster plan which will guide the City in
the future development of the wastewater collection system in an
Orderly and economical sannar; and
VHEIX0j Sectica 2.09 of the Charter of the City of D"too,
Texas <rouires that every act of the Council providing for the
contraotias for iadebtedaess
efcpinditure of funds or for this
shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF DY.NTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINSs
SECTION I.
That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby authorised and
directed to execute and attest, respectively, the agreewent
between the City of Denton, and Freese and Nichols Inc.,
providing for professional services in connection with the
development' of a seater- plan for the future development of the
city's wastewater collection ' system under the terms sad
conditions contained in said agreement which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
SECTION It.
That this ordinance shall becose effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of October, 1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHAIMM ALLENO CITY SECRETARY
CCITY DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D..NORRIS0 ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DCN"t TEXAS
BY:
r a nmu-7wr . °r.?^,~~.;..,.;~; ~Iy. k„ w ":Y:a vn;ajct.+!~a,.; vili.
i
t k iME0''INC SEhvZCES
STATE OF TEXAS ~
COUNTY OF DENTON
THIS CONTRACT entered into this day of October 1984, by and
between the City of Denton, Texas, here after celled the Owner, acting
by and through Richard 0. Stewart, Its Mayor, duly authorized to act,
and Freese and Nichols, Inc,, Consulting Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas,
hereinafter called the Enginer,
WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and agreeswnts
herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. Ewlwnnt of Engineer: The Owner hereby employs the Engineer and
n near a o perform professional services as herein set
i;arth n 'conroction' with `tM diV4lopelint of a master plan for the
'future develdpvtot of the City's wastewater 'collection system.
it, Character and E ,ii t o aicga; The: Engineer shall perform
pr0rosssiional services co".rislog investigations and studies Per-
taining to present and future flows in~the wastewater collection
system and to determine a cost effective method of transporting
thhe'se waste flows to the wastewater treatment plant for treatment,
resulting 'in a master plan 'which will guide the City in the future
devel,opment of the wastewater collection system in an orderly and
economical manner.
III. Scope of Services: the scope of work shall include the following:
1. Population:
a. Review the historical population trends and population
projections `based 'on informotiom available from the. City
of. Denton, the North Central, Texas Council of> Goveef,-
ments', and the census publications., For the purposes of
these `investigations, the planning years will be 1985
(for current conditions), 2000 and 2010.
b. Using available information from the City of Denton, make
projections as to d4tributi0n of the population for the
planning years 19850 2000 and 2010.
2. Wastewater Flows.4
a. Review records of wastewater flows at the Wastewater
Reclamation Plant to determine overall trends in flows
and patterns of flows.
i
1.
i
77
1
b. Wv~Top a prod .,t on of: future 'wae4kter. flowc for the
st years of l86+ 2000 and 20110 based 'on the projected
poppuation and anticipated Per capita flows,
3. CollgStion $Yst
a, p velop a drainage` area map of the City identifying the
1~mits of watersheds one square mile or larger in size.
The study area limits sha11'pe the sane as the study area
shown on Plate C of the Facility Planning Report prepared
by Freese and Nichols in 1974, with the exclusion of the
Cities of Krum, Shady Shores, and Lake Dallas;
b. Update the existing Wastewater Collection System Map,
contained in the Facility Plan dated 1974 and prepared by
Freese and Nichols, to include all major trunk mains and
collector mains which are to be studied under these
investigations.
C. Review the *xia}tinq facilities and inventory pipe sizes
1241 nohas in di deter or greater,' slopes, aqO', and
physical .060ditions. At'" 4y be ~i4i0*i,nhd from ava' 1!~.ie
information in the City's records., those 11nes,ssial'er
than 12 inches that serve as major collector mains will
also be included. No field investigations are intl dad
as a. Part of these studies except as related to 1-ft
stations as described in Paragraph 3.d.
d. Conduct tests at t iinimum of three lift stations in an
effort to determine rate of flow and total flow through
the station, These tests will be hated upon recording
electrical current to deterioine hours of operation of
pumps, together with the utilization of pump performance
curves to, develop ;'flows. It is anticipted that'the City
will furnish personnel and electrical recording meters,
e. Project flows in the major trunk main and collector mains
(as described in Paragraph 3.c,) for the study years of
1965,2000, and 2010. 0ased on this information, deter-
mine the adequacy of the present system to:meet-the pro
,jectod requirements. Develop recommendations for
additional facilities to accommodate the deficiencies
determined.
4. Estimate of Probable Construction Cost:
a. Prepare estiOtes,of probaple construction cost of
°recommended improvep►ehts to meet the `projected require-
m6hts for the years',A85 and 2000. Cost estimates will
be based on 1985 dollars.
b. Review.-theuse of television equipment for inspection of
,futilities in the pity. Neke appropriate'recoeasendationa
together with estimates of cost.
2.
1 '
' ,m „!?'+~'^:$'~rTMP SFi r,^F'"C"➢¢~.,.~±dir..x~°._,-p,:E+~•drtgW~,.~~..~`'.~~~~'~~~a+e+`,"~
C* Pre re a reCOSMM"flifed 'k1hedule for construction, of the
proposed I mprovoooots thro4ch 199 1 n the form of a
Capital Ieprovemnt Program,
5, Rl2ort:
a. Assemble and summarize the basic data, studies, findings
and recommendations into a draft report and submit three
copies of the report to the City for review and comment.
b. Upon receipt of the City's consents, prepare a final
report and submit 25 copies to the City.
IV. Tie o Com l t on, The review draft of the report shall be
delivered to e Owner within one hundred eighty (180) calendar
days following authorization to proceed with the study. The
twenty-five (25) printed and bound copies of the final report shall
be delivered to the Owner within fifteen (15) calendar days
following review and approval of the draft.
V. F":
1. The Owner agrees to pay the Engineer for all services rendered
under this-"contract on a cost tines multiplier basis in ac-
cordance with the attached Schedule of Charges, with the total
mui" fee not to exceed $50,000 without prior approval from
the City of Denton.
2. Payment will be made on statenlehts submitted by, the Engineer.
Statements shall not be submitted at intervals of less than
one (1) month.
VII. Successors and AssiEneentsr The Owner and the Engineer, each binds
mte , s successors, executors, administrators and assigns' of
the other party to this 'Agreement, and to the successors, exe-
cutors, administrators, and assigns of such other party in respect
of all covenants of this Agreement. Neither the Owner nor the
Engineer shall assign, sublet or transfer his interests in this
Agreement,without"the written consent of the other.
This Contract is executed in three counterparts.
f
3.
R':"~^~Wx` m....
q,l,7~a
S 1
i
IN T ST2Nl~MiY HWOF, t* have exacyted this Agree"nt the day and
year first above written.
ATTEST; COwNYROF DENTON, TEXAS
ar o o 1n, city ecre airy car Stewart, Mayor
City of Denton,` Texas City of Denton, Texas
(CITY SEAL)
WITNESS; FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
ENGINEER
By: Robert L
. , c 'so a 1
Viet President
i
4.
~ .~;q' a* '.3Pgy~~'~fi'r, ;'rev ^Y.w~ ~ T:,;•. .f;:.. ;5., 4`'~T'`~++IC
~N
a
i
Schedule of "Chimes
Staff M.t-Srs, SalAry Cott lima$ Multiplier 01,212
S414ry~'Catt is defined as the cost of salaries of anginaors, draftsMan,
stenographers, surveyoon, clerks, laborers, atc., for time directly
chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions, unaar
pl"nt compensation nsurance, ratiraMent benefits, ,aedlcal and -in.
surance bonefits, bonuses, sick leave vacation and holiday pay eppli,
cablo thereto, (Salary Cost is aqua to 1.39 times salary p4"ts.
This factor Is ad ustod annually.)
Qther Qfrect go" Actual Cost Tim" Hultipl or of 1.0
Other 'diu'aot
*sow NN11 i noludR._ p~ri l tihll awl 1fMOd'wM6 l e>epens ,
eaNMt~iidati,pn ah~ travil. tti~►portq~ion ~atends arm front
Fort ~rtA' acrd o olsaellaneouo a We' dirodtly N OtAw
to RM;work,
i lvflind costs `'ot laboratory analyl teats, and other work required
to be done by independent parsons or agents other than staff hrs.
I
I
i
I
i
I
i
ka", 4
77
N*~M'1i4: Ubilieis• 10asd
e~x 1!, 194
s°
90 CpNS1DU RESOLUTION U $INR DI~NT0;1' S INTENT TO RN'~'t
INTO A WATER SALES AGU ENT WITH ARGYLE WATER SUPPLY
CORPORATION.
The Board in its discussion wished to delay action pending
review of its policy,regardin$ ling extensions and service
outside the city liAtts.
Herring made a motion to table this item, second by Cooses,
S ayes, no nayea, sotioa carried.
10. CONSIDER CONTRACT WITH MEESE 6 NICHOLS-DXNTON WATER
TRffiA'YMOT PLANT EXPANSION SITE STUDY.
Nelson advised th+N Board that the contract followed the
discussion at the previous sooting k.eping in stud the
not"-to-exceed linits.
Cooms aide a motion to recomseaid approVal of this
contract, 'second by Herring, 5 ayes, no nayes, motion
carried.
110 CONSIDU CONTRACT WITH P' WE Is NICNOLS, INC. FOR ?WTZR
PLAN UPDATE FOR SEWER COLLECTION $YST%Nq
Has recommended this itudy to supplement the water *&*ter
plan for sore consistent guidance on future axteniions.
The plan will cover the city plus the extraterritorial
Jurisdiction.
Herringsade a notion to recommend to the City Council that
this contract be approved, second by Coomes, S Ayes, no
nayes, motion carried.
12. DISCUSS ELECTRIC, WATER AND SEWER RATES.
A report was given by Cryan with eneral discussion: The
Board °receivad complete copies of 'the rate proposals and
design criteria. Staff responded to questions tegardinf
costs to Denton customers relative to other utilities
do"ad costs and 'relative incriasea. A work session was
regwsted by the Board to be held"on S*ptember 25, 1954,at
5:00 PM. No further actionwas taken on this item at this
tiAa.
With no further business,, 'the Board adjourned at 12:00 PM.
321SUs3
.4;-a. rrt7 ;:Azi ••r l;i vf.-n-cwF.r `r~ ,.n:P-. s;.~-aT .r-z,,'..
K ,
~~o',+or S 1984
CITY COUNCIL A4gNDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider, a Contract with Freese & Nichols, Inc., for Denton
Water Treatment Plant Expansion Site Study,
SUMMARY:
The Freese & Nichols Water Treatment Plant Expansion study
identified the northwestern section of Denton as the most
economically feasible location for the plant. However, the
exact site was not identified since this requires
substantial topographical and soil condition analysis.
The attached proposed contract with Freese 66 Niohole will
identify a speoific site, The main points of the contract
are
Determine in conjunction with the Hogan and Rasor
Engineer, Inc., Water Distribution Study, the most
loj'icalsite to tie into the existing and proposed
future water network.
Detanine the most advantageous site from an elevation
standpoint.
Determine how site will be tied into sewer system for
expulsion of waste products removed fr6m raw-water$
Determine size and shape of site required and access
thereto.
Determine easements for pipelines required to be
served by new plant,
Determine,' present owners of propertiu and assist city
in obtaining land cost appraisals.
- Make presentation to Public Utilj,tiea BoAtd, City
Council and possibly Planning and toning `Commission.
FISCAL SUMMARY :
Proposed Freese & 'Nichols, Inc., contriOt not-to-exceed
$22,000.
Source of Funds: Bond Funds 623-008-0460-8502
3216U:2
~I
ACTION REQUIRMI
1, Approve or delay, action on the recootendation by
Freese & Nichols` of the general location of u new
water lent in the northwestern section of Donton,
identii~ied as Alternative No, 7 of the Water Treatment
Plant Expansion Study,
2, Approve or disapprove contract with Freese & nichols
for the specific site study.
RECOMMENDATION t
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of September
19, 1984, recommended to the City Council that they accept
the Freese & Nichols, Inc„ study of the City of Denton
Water Treatment Pla'at expansion and approve Alternative 7
(for site selection only) which is the location of a new
treatment plant in the northwest sector of the City of
Denton
The Public Utilities Board further recommends that the3lnoty
Council approve the contract with Freese 66 Nichols, ,
for site selection of the' new water plant in an amount
not-to-exceed $22,400•
Res ectfull
f r j
g. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Location Map
I'l Contract- Freese & Nichols for Site Study
III Minutes PUB Meettng'of 9/19/84
31160:3
:.N i s I, Q'F"!i"' ~[!F*',7FT': ^r^-rr..?3 r _'S+T.u "'S413r. a•?fia: v, ' 7 tl,.
t 1J
71
. ~M,•Ru~r~'io ~ftif hiss ~osxd
Mx 1! 1!M
co tlDp4 1*LUTION VA USING Di rt N' a INTENT TO ENTER
9$
INT A TER BALM AGREEMENT WITH ARGYLE WATER SUPPLY
OQRPORATIONO
The Board in its discussion wished to delay action pending
review of its policy regarding line %xtent► ons and service
outside the city limits.
Herring made a notion to table this iteat second by Coomes,
5 ayes, no nayes, motion carded.
100 CONSIDER CONTRACT WITH FREESE b NICHOLS•DENTON WATER
TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION SITE STUDY.
isqu advised the Board that the contract followed thrl
discussion at the previous meeting keepiap in mind the
aot•to-exceed liml,ts.
Coo"# aide` a motion to recommend approval of this,
co,atradt, second by gorring, 5 ayes, no nayes, motion
'carried.
11. CONSIDER C WITH,, FREEZE 6 NICHLS, INC. ?OR NASTER j
PLAN UPDATE h `•~!WER COt.LtC'TION SYSTEM'
a" recommendic,'"this study to supplement the water sootor
plan, for sore consistent guidance on future extensions.
The plan will cover the city plus the extraterritorial
jurisdiction$
Herring made a motion to recommend to the City Council that
this contract be approved, second by Cooees, 5 ayes, no
nayes, motion Carried.
12. DISCUSS ELECTRIC, WATER AND SEWER PLATES.
A report was given by Cryan with eneral discussion. The
Bo'►rd received complete copies ' of the ruts proposals' apd
design criteria, Staff responded to `questions regarding
costs to 'Denton customers relative to other utilities
deaand costs and ralAtive increases., A work session was
reqquested by the Board to be held on September 25, 10849, at
5: 0O PM. No further action was taken on this item at this
tires.
With no further business, the Board adjourned at 12;00'PHO
3215U:3
N0.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN A"IEKENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON
AND MEESE AND NICHOLS INC. FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTIN0 SERVICES
IN REGARD TO THE LOCAf%OH OF A NEW WATZA TREATMENT PLANT, AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
I
WHEREAS, it is in the beat interest of the City of Denton to
provide for its future needs for water treatment facilities; and
WHEREAS, the city staff and Public Utilities Board has
recomaended that Freese and Nichols, Inc., consulting engineers,
be retained to studyy and identify possible sites for a new water
treatment plant; and
WHUM t,'Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas rM4uiree that every act of the Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contrasting for indebtedness
shall be by ot'dinance; NOW, TRXREPM ,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DZWON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAIN&t
SECTION I
That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby authorised and
directed to execute and attest, respectively, the agreement
between tho City of Denton, Lnd Freese and Nichols, Inc.,
providing for pprofessional services co4rising of engineering
studies of available sites for construction of a municipal water
treatment plant under the terms and conditions being contained
in said agreement which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
SECTION II.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of October, 1984.
RICHARD 0, i HAYOK
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
c
CITY OF DENTON,,'tEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FOAM:
JOE U. W09AISO ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYt ~ 'm
,r
yT' '5i,~''f..
'~rf f'.~ t' K'- " Yr.3mi
i
641'"EERINO SERVICES
`'SYATt; OF TEXAS 1
colfTV OF,OENTOM
THIS' CONTRACT.dntlred into this day of October 1984,`4y and
botlz, the'City of Oi` ton, Texas, he" ft9r called the owner, acting
by and through Richard O. Stewart, its mayor, duty authorittd to act,
and Freese and Nichols, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Fort' Worth, Texas,'
hereinafter called the Engineer.
WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and agreements
herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. E to nt of n ineer< The Owner hereby employs the Engineer and
the Engineer agrees to perform all necessary professional services
as herein; set forth in connection with the engineering evaluation
of Alternative locations for construction of a, new water treatment
plant.in the northwest section of the City.
It. h r r 4 rrid g4te t of Services.- Tho Engineer ' shall, perform
y cng anginmring studies, including a
services
Piro ,a s, onafettiTve anal si
s, of available sites for construction of a
C6$ „ f
Municipal water treateeent plant 'in the' n0'rthwest section' of the
City, with dons ideration'giYen'to a water supply to the new plant
from the Ray Roberts Reservoir now under construction.
III. Scope, of Services: The scope of work shall include the following:
A. Locate possible sites with suitable topography for a Water
Treatment Plant on uSGS topographic maps,
R. Conduct field inspection of the possible sites and reduce the
number to only those which appear best.
C. Select for each of the sites a tentative routing for raw water
line, high service line connection to distribution system,
line for disposal of sludges, access road, natural gas line,
and electrical service. Reduce the selections to t)%* two best
sites.
0. Prepare tentativeplant layout for tech sito with considera-
tion given to future expansions Prepare estimate of probable
cost for development of facilities on each site.
F. Have soils laboratory drill at least two (2) test holes on
each site to determine soil classification and to evaluate
foundation requirements,
F. Prepare a'draift report'suwari,tinghe W'sic data obttlned in
the study' and presenting recommendations and estimate of
probable cost.
1.
/fi "R° t rtC aT 1 i. +P' 9i •Yw e'C y[ -sb T :A r Fa w+. 777;
5'`at }i .ib' f` ,rig
i
0. follow'ing &"royal of the draft report, twenty*five (25) bound
copies of the final report shall be presented to the City
(Owner).
IV, t ; The review draft, of the 'report a ,e11 be. do-
orr % " o or within oM hur►gtred oightX (1d0) calald#r :goys
following!outhorluiion td proce0d with the study. The twent114five
1~V4rk pr1 to t he ~ und within tefit een~(1Sfil )calendart days shall
followiinng
review:"and approval of the draft.
V. P t; The Owner agrees to pay the Engineer for all services
e 'under this contract on a cost times multiplier basis in
accordance with the attached Schedule of Cherges with the total
maximum foot exclusive of `Iaborstory'Charges, not to exceed $22,000
without prior approval from the City of Denton, Payment will be
made 'on,statements submitted by the Enginear, Statements shall not
be submitted at intervals of less than one (1) month.
Vi. The Owner Ind the Engineer each binds
hime r cas o s, sex*006rs, adoinistretors and' assiths `of
the other; pat~tY . to this Agee Rent, And t0 the succelAors, esocu-
tors , adpi"nistratprs, 'and es*f4hs of sueh`other party in respect of
all covenants of thls'Agreement, 4either the Owner nor the Engi-
naer shall assign, sublet or,transfer his interests in this Agree-
ment without the written consent of the other,
This Contract is executad in three counterparts.
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, they have executed this Agreement, the day and
year first above written,
ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
OWNER
Char otte A en, City Secretary car tewart, Mayor
City of Denton, Texas City of OorAon, Texas
CITY SEAL)
WITNESS: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC;
ENGINEER
Robert Cho1$r
Vice President
2'
41 `
F N •
Schedule of 04*s
Staff Myibe s Salahy'Cost Ties Hultiplier ott2t2
Salary, post is defined as the,cnst'of sAlaOies'of ehoineersw draftsmNen,
st*,*' raphors, surveyo"O Clarks, laborers, atc., for time directly
chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions, oft
ploymsnt compensation `insurance, retirement benefits, medical and in-
surance benefits, boouses,'sick leaya vacation and holiday pay a"11-
cable, thereto. Salary cost is equal to 1.39 times salary payments.
This ` factor is adjusted annually.)
other Direct Actual Cost Times !lultiplier of 1.0
E oar d# rl incl on um
~ . u~► ~ . ~ ±ri~ t~duat por►se
,
go* iCAI ;.e, ~r'i►1+I 0 l~ti! t'tst~rM .+ilid'\~1ot U aw ("0
F ` If4si,tb . M his i tan4mws' sp dittiotly "lot" to tM' weiMc
i~kruding costs of laboratory ahalyas, tuts, °a~nd 6lher work required
to bo done • by i ndependent persons or agents ether then staff members.
t
a Ayw 9_`Yvu 1 . m `fi 1`".:n+~4p3" F ,-~yt-~.-.: x ~(r+R'7o~•f+ oT'.:. t f y~#T
tr a
P
RESOLUTION
be IT RESOLVED 4Y THE COUNCIL OF TRI CITY OX DENTON, TEXASi
SECTION I.
That the Policies of the Emily Fowler Public Library as
approved by Ch* City Council on December 70 1976 are amended to
provide for foes for nonctty residents. The policy provision of
"Registration of borrowers" providing for the eligibility of
persons for library cards which presently reads as follows%
1. Residences An adult applicant who States, that he is
s r"a,*at ra tdAnt o! Denton sod/or Denton Cowaty
and gives as address in eitMr is eligiWo for 'a
library card from of char upon makLaS application
and presenting proper iden ~fi4ation,
is hereby amended to road as follows:
1. Residences An adult applicant who submits reasonable
do'ciirAhtatioh or 'itiforr tiop that tho' person pp~olr".
neatly resides within the city lirits is •ligib ~a
for a library cord free of charge upon raking proper
application.
An applicant who it not a porsianent resident of the
city of Denton, but who is a resident of Denton
County, asy upon proper application and payment of
an annual fee of eleven dollars ($11.00) be issued a
library card which is valid for a period of one year.
SECTION It.
This Resolution shall become effective from and after its
date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 2nd day of October, 1984.
KIM= 0, STEURT, MATUR
CITY OF DENTONj'TLXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
AP1".Mu A8 TO LZ04L Foams
„ JOIE D. NORMS, ACTING CfTY ATtORM
CITY' OF 09MON, TEXAS
sY s _ Y1'L„
+r
n'P"'; 'N:1+s, ~,,ry.' M~'?lir 1. i `t +~R "~j"~ :z.s ~Y `w }R +6 r. It• ulcep
, i ,T l l 4'.'+.'4 ,
t f
1
DF,NMN PUBLIC ),1BRARl'
i. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES
4 The regular meeting of the Denton Library Board was held'on Thursday
P`. 26 July 1984 in the Board Room of the Denton Public Library at 7130 p.m.
PRESENT: A. Travelle (chai Haan), K. Ferstl (secretary), L.Conzales,
R. Hutton, S. Lockhart, K. McCallon, R. Stephens, and J. Orr.
{ ABSENT: A. Lookabaugh (ex), M, Nichols (ex)
1, K, Ferstl moved, R, Stephens seconded, that the minutes of the 26 April 1984
meeting be approved as corrected, Motion carried unanimously. (No formal
Board meeting was held in May. Board members attended the annual conference
of the American Library Association in Dallas in June in lieu of the June
Board meeting,)
. 2, Polic Manual: Passages in the policy manual related to out-of-city
and/or out-of-county patrons may need, to be revised, depending upon the
f'jh'bl decision which the. County Commissioners make `about 'the County's
'o rtion of funding for the Library. J. Orr will identify'and'revise such
statements accordingly. K. Ferstl will do the final proofreading,
t 3. Cot,nty Patr4ons: The Board discussed the alternatives should the County
` Commissioners continue to 'include no'funding `for the Library in their
FY 1985 bud8et. As a result of this discussion, R. Hutton moved, K, Mc-
Callon seconded, that the Board instruct J. Orr to draft a statement
indicating that an out-of-city user fee of $35 per year would be assessed
non-Denton residents in the event that the Commissioners' Court terminates
County funding for the Library, (This amount is the same as that previously
determined by the Board as a user fee for out-of-county users. See the
Board Minutes of 29 September 1983.) The statement will be forwarded to
B. McKee, Assistant City Manager, for presentation to the City Council.
4. Announcement of Dinner: The Board will meet at Allie l's for dinner on
Thursday, 30 August 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in lieu of its regular Board meeting,
5, Old Business
The. Libratu %•111 continue its present schedule after Labor Day, Considera-
tion will be given to adjusting the schedule should tho situation warrant it.
6. riew Business
The Nominating Committee proposed the following slate of officers:
A, Travelle, chairman; R. Hutton,` vice chairman; K. Ferstl, secretary,
There were no additional nominations from the floor for each position.
L. Gonzales moved, S. Lockhart seconded, that the proposed slate be accepted,
Motion carried unanimously. (The members of the Nominating Committee appointed
by A. Travelle were: K. Ferstl, chairman, R. Hutton, and S. Lockhart.)
I
4. a
27
fi ' ` MS at' 'th'i gib` Duly a4~A' Aitatva ~.fbrat~' hbard'ree~t'3ty► 2
a
VS Two letters were presented for the Soard's information: Neil B.
Shay's letter to Judge Duddy Cole related to the County funding of the
Library; and the letter from the.chil'dtop of Sen L. and Mary Grace
Smith which acccmpimiod a check for $4,000 to the Emily Fowler Library
Foundation *a a aemorial to their parents,
7. K, Mc Callon moved, S. Lockhart seconded, that the meeting be adjourned.
Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p,m,
6
i
i
i
i
1
t,
e
} R.,..7S,Y"`+"?5'~?d i ",y„~w ?~7'„rm . p, -b.'8.~,.'°'+pae"~.;.:<a -,,,;.;.r* n,.~,-•'~.a;
October 2; 1984 t
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITE!!
SU$JECT:
Receive a Report on Proposed 1984 Electric,
Water-Wastewater Rats Changes,
SUMMARY:
Included with the Agenda Packet, under separate cover, is
the 1964 Electric and Water Rate Study for the Utility
Department. Along with the Rate Study are the Electric,
Water and Wastewater revised Rate Schedules, These
schedules will be orgganized into proposed new rate
ordinance(s) for consideration by the Council at the
October 16, 1964, Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRM:
Review Rate Study and proposed rate schedules, offer
comments and direction to Staff,
Respectfully,
E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I 1984 Electric and Water Kate Studl,:
II Electric Rate Schedules
III Water/Wastewater Rate Schedules
32i6U6
j
y.T<r.Ygt?°''FdP^»• -;gn~,IxzSPCS°.,y'zFx..~7Z 9
o ,
r, October Z, 1984
R
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUkJECT;
Request for Water and Seder Service Outside Denton City
Limits by Jay-Mar Addition, Lot 1, Block 1.
SUMMARY:
The Jay•Mar Addition is a 5,7 acre development of l,i'ght
industrial machine shop and commercial office space
proposed on NM Road 4181 (south Teasley Lane) adjacent to
Old Alton Churclti. There presently exists an V waterline
and a 15" sanitary sewerline which have very recently been
costructed by the Nickory.Creek Mobile Home Park developer
in' this area, Jay Mar Addition proposed t* ,0&y pro rota
ch ,tie'$ In older to tie on to the adjacent sinita'ry
set~erl,ine; and since PM Road 2181 is a utate ;hf*hwny, they
propose to tie on and bore underneath this road to the 8"
existing waterline., 'they will be required to extend an e"
waterline across the frontage of their property on the
south side of PM Road 118;.
Jay-Mar Addition Is requesting by attached letter to tie on
to the City of Denton water and sewer system.
FISCAL SUANARY:
All tie on and construction costs will be paid by Jay-Mar
Addition.
ACTION k9QUIRSD:
Approval or disapproval by City Council to provide water
and sanitary sewer service outside the Denton city limits
to Jay-Mar Addition.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Boatd, at their meeting of 8/29/84,
recommended the City Council approve water and sewer
service outside the. Denton 'city limits and within the
Denton extraterritorial jurisdictional area to Jay Mar
Addition so long as all costs are borne by Jay-Mar
311nU:17
111^9CE!a YA'' f+rf 4S;i°;.° 'wat e..',ypn.'c e w ^rr „lp~ c$ I4~idlte 3:rs°,.«'~`?'!R.$~+'+A°~,
I.
Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their
meeting of September 12, 1984, also recommended approval of
this request.
Respectfully,
R. 8. Nelso
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Letter` of Request
11 Location Map
III Minutes PU8 Meeting of 8/29/84
IV Minutes P`Z Meeting of 9/12/84
M
3116U:18
W rT 77.
'
04INIM AND WAVOM
'ttA11P0~0 "MlM NAW'Y+~M~M• ►.44 AM ►~l1~OM+Y
04M 0014 ~A1MMM1 MM!MYO Y"M KWO4 V4
1 DRIV! • DWON, TW4 *NX • (817) 391416 • ~1174W
METRO 4*1002
24 August 1984
Mr, David Ham
Assistant Director of Utilities
City of Denton
215 E, McKinney Street
Denton, TX 76201
Res Jay `Mar Addition
Dear' Mr. < Ham:
On beIbalf of our client I am requesting, water and sewer service
for this ote»l'ot subdivision located along the south side of
FM 2181 just after FM 2181 turns east toward I-35E.
The lot is outside the Denton City limits but within the
extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Benton.
Please 'place this request on the Public Utility Board agenda
for consideration at your earliest ca.'renience,
Sincerely,
4,
Charles S. Watkins
CSW/sm
w
" d t r /
pr,A1TON
1 ~ ~ tit
POP EVELYN L, FR!CE, f.
V, 745 P $31 R ,"..»....;......t. ,
%
LOT
IBLOC. HIGKgR11 GK,• 1' JAiy-
5,6x08 Ac, LOCATION MAP
1 1
1
0' s
r
FIT
An
x Mt*
118.8'
~•ssi
sE s ee" , ~:.C~ .Zj
;4~ 1 A~It1 ~ # o t~ lwas Board
rase S
*60
6• CONSIOR RX$OLU' ION EXP SING QLSNT4 i INTZNT TO -11t"S>7P'TM
-
.
Thompson felt this item needed further study. Coomes made a
motion to table. Thompson second. Five ayes, no Hayes,
motion carried.
7. CEO SI REQUEST WATER SEWER OUTSIDE DENTON
CC IT iw
MA
s Aftor a brief 'disoussion, Thompson **de a motion to
recommend to the City Council that this requast for
watcv/sewer service be approved. Second by Herring, five
ayes, no nayes, motion carried.
8. CONSIDER AMF.K CONTRACT FOR SEWER SERVICE T
z'
After a brief disdiAsston, Thompson made a ''motion to approve
the amended contract subject to the Ci'ryy teal Depart*ant
review and approval, second by Boyd, Your ayes, l
abstention, motion carried.
9. 0O; XD ACTIN OIL CITY OF DENTON WATER TREATKENT PLANT
Nelson stated that we must begin looking for a plant site.
Laney requested the staff negotiate a'contract to do a site
study. No further action was taken at this time.
10. CONSIDER DEVELOPMENT OF A MASTER PLAN FOR SEWER COLLECTION
SYSTER6
Laney requested the Staff develop a proposal. No further
action at this time.
12. CONSIDER ABANDON ENT OF 69 KV TRANSMISSION LINE _EASEME14T
NETWEE4 LQGUST Amu WINDSOR.
After a brief discussion, Boyd made a motion to approve
subject abandonment, second by Thompson, five ayes, no
nayes, motion carried.
' 134 CONSIDER PROPOSED EASEMENT LICENSE TRACT F-5549 L_EWIS_ VILLE
~
WME;-TEitX b"K ~GSRPS_Q M New
Presented by Dave Has who stated the line is dedicated.
Motion by Herring to approve proposed easement/ license,
second by Boyd, five ayes, no Hayes, emotion carried.
4y 3165Ut3
}w.pr.m-,^°w-.-.c.*-m,-° --:-.rmm•.P-iar '-•,zrT,. "'~s~,7~
f+ay. 3 P42 M'mnw 9/13/61
H. CAnsidir providinq water and sewer service outside
Denton city limits to Jay"Mar Addition, lot 1, block 1.
Mr. Nam stated this is a request for water And sewer
outside the city limits of Denton, The Jay Mar Addi-
tion is a small development of light industries machine
shop and commercial office space proposed on rM Road
2181 (South Teasley Lane) ad *cent to old Alton Church.
tie stated there promently exists an 8 inch water line
and -a 15 inoh sanitary sewer lime which have very re-
Oently been constructed by the Hickory Creek Mobile
Home Park developer in this area. He stated Jay-Mar
Addition proposes to pay pro rata charges in order
to tie on to the adjacent sanitaryy sewer linet and
since FM Road 2181 is a state highway, they ppropose to
tie on and born underneath 'this road to the 8 inch
waterline aoross the ,frontage of their props y
the south side of FM 'Road 2181. He stated the Public
Utility hard recommends Approval.
3 'Oo q'uOotion from Mr, claiborne, Mr. Ham stated yes,
the water line already exists.
Mr. Sidor commented he sees no reason not to recommend
approval.
Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval to consi-
der providing water and sewer service outside Denton
city limits to Jay-Mar Addition, lot 1, block 1.
Socohded by Mr. Escue and carried unanimouslyf -0).
1. Consider providing water and sewer service to West
Lake North/South Addition (formerly Denton County
North Mobile Subdivision and Denton County South
Mobile S baivision) on East McKinney Street adjacent
to VacaTkl' Village Estates.
Mr, Ham stated Homecraft Development Services, Inc,
has requested Denton sewer service for the purpose of
their new development. He stated Homecraft did not
request permission to tie into the City of Denton water
services instead expressed a desire to be served by the
Vacation Village Water Company. He stated the develop-
ment is to be constructed on East McKinney Street
adjacent to Vacation,: Village Estates. He stated this
project is 152 lots,,and will consist, essentially of
mobile home sites termed as manufactured housing and
at the present time adequate Water and sanitary sower
facilities do not exist in this area except for water
wells serving "Vacation Village Estates which are not
adeqh uate for those two new subdivisions and some
whOity does remain on the sanitary sewer lift stati6os
would be inadequate for these two new subdivisions.
He further stated since the Public Utility Board met
on August 15, 1984 .the utility staff has determined
than the sewer loading of the new development would
require improvements to the existing lift station with
a new forced main and a new gravity 'line to serve this
n^.°.wR'9~?w1lRRnP^TM",f*+o .qr+m p:~ _ F.:"„'^+.°'isq.'rzv
Pogo' 4
pzoposod dank*lo$aa*nt. IN addition, thO utility .de..
paxtment Ntoff would recommend that this new sub
division development be served by extending a water
line from Mayhill Road down MOinney Street to this
new development, The size of this water line should
be at laast a 12" six*, He further stated any over-
sizing or newer extensions will be borne by the de-
veloper,
Mr, LaOorte made a motion to recommend approval to
` consider provide water and sewer service to West Lake
North/South Addition (formerly Denton County North
and Denton South Mobile Subdivision) on East MaXiAney
Street adjacent to Vacation Village Estates, Seconded
by Mr, Esaue and unanitruusly carried (7-0).
i? -
i,
t
4
i
octbbor 2, 1484 •
CIT'; COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Consider Providing Water/Sewer Service to Denton County
North Mobile Subdivision and Denton County So%tth Mobile
Subdivision on East McKinney Street Adjacent to Vacation
Village Estates.
SUMMARY:
Home.craft Development Services,, Inc., is requesting Denton
water and sewer service for their new development, The
development is to be constructed ,id,jacent to Vacation
Village Estates. This project is 552 lots and will consist
essentially of modular home sites termed as manufactured
housing,
The City of Denton has a Certificate of Convenience and
a Necessity ta'serve'this rea.
The sewer loading of the new development would require
improvements to the existing lift station serving Vacation
Village plus a new forced 'main and a new gravity line to
serve this proposed development.
In addition, it will be necessary to extend a 12" line from
Mayhill Road down McKinney Street to this new development.
12. size
The size of this waterline should be at least a
initially and may reduce to 10" near the development. Any
oversizing would be tonne by this developer.
Homecraft Devolopmenk Services would be entitled to a pro
rata agreement on ;.any water or sanitary sewerlines
constructed offsite.
This development is outside of the Denton city limits;
however, within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the
City of Denton,
FISCAL SUMMARY:
All costs for sewer extensions will be borne by the
developer.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Approve or disapprove authorizing Homecraft Development
Services Inc,, to extend City of Denton water and sewer
service to proposed development.
3216U14
v;
i
i
a ALT TIVES
1. Approve or disapprove authorizing IIlomooraft
Development Services, Inc,, to extend City of Denton
water and sewer service to proposed development.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of Ai13ust 29,
1984, recommended approval of providing water and sanitary
sewer service outside the City limits, provided the
developer pays all costs of water And sewerli.ne extensions,
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their meeting of
September 12, 1984, recommended to the Council that they
approve providing water and sewer service to West Fake
North/South Addition ' (Formerly Denton County North );Ind
Denton 'South Mobile Subdivision) on East McKinney Street
adjacent to Vacation Village Estates.
Re S~~t u ly,
•G
R. E. Nelson
Director of Utilities
EXHIBIT I Letter of Request- 8/14/84
II Location Map
III TDH Certif. Conv. & Nec, for Vacation Village Wtr
Supply Co. and Vacation Village Sewer Company
IV PUB Minutes of 8/29/34
V p&Z Commission Minutes of 9/12/84
3216U:17
d'.
T
HOMECPArr DIIVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC.
WlLaifp66WAV,3111T6620 . DALW, T6xASNM ~ (2141W040
dALLA&POpT WORTH DIVISION
PHILIP F. BAR89A
August 14, 1984 VICE PA6610614T, MANA86R
Mr. C. David Ham
Assistant Director of Utilities
Water/Wastwater Divisions
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
o. HAND DELIVERED
$3
r Dear Mr. Hama
This letter serves as :a revision of our request of August; 1984,
and Homecrq£t Cnterprises Corporation now request?) permission to
tie into existing City of Denton sower facilities, for the purpose
of serving units to be constructed on property located in the City
of Denton ETJ and referenced in the preliminary plats entitiled
Demon ~10unty North Mobile Subdivision and Denton County South Mobile
Subdivision.
11omecraft does not now request permission to tie into existing City
of Denton water facilities as Homecraft desires to be served by the
Vacation Village Water Company.
Sincerely,
Philip F. Barber
PFB/gel
,r.
777,
l
yy IIII 4
1
A
4 1
i y
/ VICINITY MAP aww~►~i.
SW4 too ?Ci00 N
PROP. OENTor4 COUMY
NORTH MOBILE SUAbIVISION
OATA
AREA' AW Ad.
2) NtAW R CA LOTS 274
'U simoks WIDE LOTS a, Vill"*
TYR DM N 'A wiM; i12' % 4S' ~sfura.
TYP A+ifrA 3040 IF
s) OWSLE moo poi's
T R CIPTH A Wlor>•I 97'x 6t'
TYR AREA 5044 S.F Qy1•~L~
Q) MIN. 4. 97RECT RAO IUS t'!0' ? O, 0;~
0
otwE~ov~e
~CMECRAFT ENTERPRISES CORP.
h r p, ly ;ylf +i i vl.lsa J t• i`,.. r • ~.ti
r~;I ~ 4 ~ + t J I I I I I I rI J,1\'~a~~ ti ~ / --I_ly i - I I ~ L.• a I ~ - - '~,I,
~ ~ .J I' f'i"1 I ~L i ~ ~ ~ '1 11 f 1 I' , I I i i 1~ ,
t L.-j ?_1 L`1. 1 \ / 1 +r.l\ t j `:-:.f I l
\ f I l ' , 1 - I
I I ~I 1IIrII(~\\.`,,\ ~ / ,,i I....a ~1 :2' ~ 11 -1~
ICI r: I
I I ~ f ! i I 1 ~ ~ i -or .i, i I I 4 ~rl :f•.-e.~
1 I ! I I I I.I i ~`I ! I~I...r:,,, 1.` , ,L \.C r L_•.:L-.. 1 __f :~..:,.I + _ I,.
r• ~ ~ ~ \j ~ I J i r 1 I I ~r i I \ \'e. t'•'~}1iJ~r`,
_ \`i,w 1~ t.•I. ~ I._i 1 -.1 I L--- ~ ~-lam, ~ I~~
f I I f Irrl`J It J._I_i f l~ TJU
r
/ - f
I
f 1 +1 .
I 't~ I I ` 1 1~
_ ..L_... . _
! f
, t e,. F•C c -
t1 1 ( I.. I ~ 1 1 eat t.. Ar1E. Ian IIFtv~nn y _ -
II III Y
I I I t
f t a i ! Y . • ,~rjl i f t .I , o r , ' 1 w rr rt „ ~i 1 I ;r -„t 11f/j , . . r~11;- is-' - ~,I
r~ Il I`4 11 ~ ~ 1 I +Ir 111111-[}j}j}i r!
VftJ._. Ld, j . IIY r `4.. _ _ JC H[
a< IJI IJ ~ _ -
DI 6tt 4t !1 ,A .r fA 41 i .4 It
r
.I fa
J
} S I hl~t( • < IF II4 III. N r ~r I f It C IJ ]iI Rw ly
44 to
TT"
f 1 M_ t i C C ~r7 61 i7 It
,
/ r, n , r1 IMU 7 T x ~1F,r ~ Ilp r~L'~~t t~ r ! G 7:
It
r~•r Rrl• ' / N I ervW
f II •L' rf r1.,! P 1, 1 'i A !d ff l~C N 1 , .t •r:rrf I N r{r if rtl.^'
C 7 t~ S\~ V P It p 1 !G 7 4 ! i } • t ,r L t, lv /5 l~
1 f..
fir
IQY PLAT kOR V4C41/ON V14L46E L*ST47rf'3 a~ r1• c~tcs ' _ « tI n » - r e
AV 6"" LIFIRt CLAI det-SM•DLP 1 (-a1 af81f'C of .r•CfivAfla.d tt] fttr n`. 1' t :..t 4_ rrr r t - 'a l
ItI! WI[414ff0 fX/,L114M ,y/,py ~dff51 J30 lase r+r, dNt•m •:w w.r>,+. es a:,. ♦at,:aua y- I .f 'r » 1 r f1 r .~~'i ►t
r c ,'I 1,•kI 47't ~rPt,gU _
~y
41 I II1I I11,IiIIIMI
IIII 11111 j I
i
J.1 l IJ i ! 11_ L.I,., 1 .l, L,i. I 1 I I .1_! I ! +_1.1.1.1 L.l. l I I_.I i I I , ir.'
~ ; J I 1 l I r 1' I ~ ~ I .I F I\I
L
I 1l.; __l
_ I. L I I T
I-[
L1 11-41 L_LLI-i 1-1 L! l1.1. 1 ..0
f~ i P I T IT C. rT.li__I`~_.I
,1`+.. I I I I I I I I I ~~1 I I 1 1 1 I ~ ~ !F_ _ : , + - i--=
f~`T_1`}...1 ~l_I 1 I I I i-'I`t !-#`I-•I 11\ ~ ~~y \ ~ ~ .;>~~...%•'I ! I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ''7`~,
I
Y
i
1
i r
wf;l i 1 1 II II ICI I I i•1) ~ I I +I'r+,, 1•~,\\\,/ l ~ t~ ~'•_1_
I ll
i I
i_ i I :l' L I I 11 ? -
i.i I i
No 7$.t 4LL' N\K
I I l i
11
,
I I
{
- - - -
-21 _ Mrs - _ • yt I N •V 'j] Affl
A UP lY' J} A i Ir t f 1 6 0 1 1 W yr/ 1} N N N N A 1 r C 1 • .1 • 1 i
r
rrw ~•..w , ~ _.T'~-- ~.rri,.._... ._._.1BA'E.._.. ._lft3lrEN._ _...~.~:_1fl!sE.__._f. V,. ~ _Nw
1
fl r w N '
r r Jk f lfr Cq rll~ 7 t "11 1 11 Si ~ 41 I sO Ip N 11-1 µ 1 n M U Q b 't. i M 11 Y H_ L l a
' _ / 11 r, l`~ • •1 N _17 - ) ~f1Uly, ' TF - _ _ _ _ _
ur r , . 1
F T M r! • N . y l r d l` .N. J: t I l sl N
j j } I t. ! - J 1 t J_ r P N
/ .t.. .f....y r A, •ul ~y: :a. r.+ 11?S_ ~ ~ g ~ _ ..-,~,~._.-~LY+e1i ~_?R'1•----~-•-.
6
11.
T-II
♦ 1 _-tTH 666 I IY* .wr) 'r 1I} HL- I ) i r b
AIr
• C ~ ~ --~'wR~ ~Ti'7rSMlt.^'q, e, ~ ' ~,*r~w `~p{"Fv'~'°T° tin . .y... a.,ryr , . ~~s - a
DOCKET N0. 230c
APO
i;I.C4014 OF`'V "All Vlt 1. 'at ATER' PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
'
COMPANY FOR A C€RYIPItArE Of CONVRNIENCE
Alip NECESSITY AN0 TO PARTIAI"i Y DECER- Of TEXAS
TIF'1CATE THE CITY Of DENTON WI IN
DENTON COUNTY
EXAMINER'S REPORr
Procedural History
On December 81 1979, Vacatio 'Villaqa water Company applied for a Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity to Pro~ids weter service in Denton County. The requested
service area lies within the certificated service area of the City of Denton. On
January 11 1979, the City of Denton filed a letter indicating its consent to the
certification of Vacation Village rovided that 0600A remain dually certificated to the
area. On January 31, 1479, Vacation Village filed a letter requesting to be singly
certified and, by implication, that Denton be partially de-certificated, and requested a
hearing.'
A hoar.iny was condycted;on Mer;;h 140 1479, the City of Denton was represented by
its city~attoloheyf Mr. Paul IshAm. Vacation Village; was represented by on* of its ow6ars,
Mr, 80, Atwol, also' an attornty. Mr. Jose Varela of the deneral Counsel's office
represented the Comwission's Staff.
On March 27, 19799 Vacation Village filed a post-hearing brief.
i Opinion
Vacation Village is a rural subdivision with 141 connections, most of which are
mobile 'homes. The applicant is a partnership engaged primarily in real estate
development, the waster system being wi ancillary enterprise. The application, as
amended, is for two distinct tracts cf land, one of which is substantially developed, the
other not, Denton's extra' territorial iurisdictien (r 7J) encompasses most of the
undeveloped tract but not the developed area. However, both tracts are within Denton's
water service area, which extends in this vicinity slightly beyond its ETJ, Vacation
Village is near the shores of Lewisville Lake, a variable level lake. Vacation Village is
about four miles from the edge of development in the City of Denton, and two miles from
the closest supply of Denton water, Vacation Village has sewer service provided by
Denton. Denton is singly certificated to provide sewer service in the area and sewer
certiflcation is not involved in this case.
The City of Denton sought an extended water service area for essentially the same
reasons stated by the City of Waco in Docket Nos, 2$ and 720, et al, to, exercise some
control over the quality of water facilities being installed near the city which may
eventually be incorporated into the city's water system, Vacation Village objects to
being required to install water facilities which meet city standards. Vacation Village
uses smaller water lines of less expensive material than, those ',used by the city. Its
owners 'allege that most !of its customers are low income ramilieswho choose rural mobile
homes to avoid the high cost of'urban housing, To require the developers to install lines
of sufficient size to provide''fire'flow capacity and othe'Nisemeet city standards for
their water system would require a greater investment (the developers contend) than can
be recovered in lot sales or water rates from the potential purchasers of the mobile home
lots Involved. '06 the other hand, Denton ,tates it does not plan to extend water service
to the area in,question`in the foreseeable future, so Vacation Village's water system 'is
the only available water source.
.Vacation Village is also concerned about Denton ihnexing their area at soma point in
the future and "donfiacating" their water system. Denton stated at the hearing that it
requires developers who desire city water to build all the necessary facilities and
donate them to;the city. It does not pear to this Examiner that such a policy would be
aopiicable to he annexation by the city of an area already served by a self-contained
tC i1 , i t y 1 v 1 .
r x vy c.. t "fir i t
NaM : ~
. water system. In such eviii►tf`the'city, aduld eithor" franchi0ir the privately owned mater
system' to continue providing WP ter' Or purch`ese the f04il.ities 04 Meke ;Whatever
improvaments it deemed necang to tie iAto the' Q' itryy's,'system+ A "Confiscation", of
Vacation Village's /aO, Wes, woild, of course, violate constitutional property {ights.
Whether Oenton-,is certificated or npt to the area would appear to be of no relevance to
the concerns about future confiscation,
A more realistic concern. is that the city might some `day Wand its water lines into
the area, not purchase vacation Village's facilities, and compete for its customers.
C etition between water systems is an evil which the Commission's certification
aut ority is intended to avoid,
The solution to the competing concern's of the cities and the rural water %Y#
within the cities' M's arrived at in Oockot Nos, 129; et'41, (Wkols BTO) appear sowted
to this cases In that case the rural water Systems were dually certific ted and Waco was
rWwired to notify the affktdd utility and this Commission at lost 1Q days prior, to the
initiation of the construction of any water, facilities intended to proVide service'i`n► the
dually cert'ificated area# The reiM~ireeent of such notice .w4s based on the Assueption
that' the threaten'iid rural- water system Could complain to this c6maissien get an
adjudication on whither or nqt th! gity should ue iloared to s rve'custo rs of tw, rural
system, This WO Or concludee thi<t.thfs Comiss on has,juristl~ction to'auiudicate such
a complaint in a water case des I ' 4~1j4 V electric cie'tificAtion catoo the Kelt•
Case (Docket No. 07): at al i. which the Commission declined to interfere wit!
customer's choice In dually Cart,fitated areas,
Regarding. Vacation Village's concern that Denton will impose onerous stander as oA
future construction of water, aciliti4s it is noted that Denton has agreed to, Vito ion
Village's original appplicetion,for certification and there is nothing An the r*cord ,#,hot
• such agreement Is onditioned upon 4A agreement by Vacation Village to meet any 4pectfi/d
construction sta4ards, The leverage of,"a city, in such a's tluation'comes few- its
standing to protest and intervene 'in a rural water system's application to expand its
service area within the city's extended service area. The City of 14aco has, for example,.
protested such proposed expansions and then withdrawn the protest when satisfied the
rural extensions' will meet certain standards.
There is evidence in the record that the developersof Vacation Village are planning
to build more facilities in,the tract which is already substantially deyeloped,"and it is
assumed by this Examiner that they Can, do so by compliance with the standards of this
Commission, the State Department of Health; and any other applicable regulations, but
without regard to standards for the city's water system.
At the hearing, Vacation Village amended its original application to add as part of
its service area the undevlloped tract and several shoreline lots In addition to the
developed tract. The developers stated that the tract is surveyed and subdivided but
that no development has occurred or is contemplated in the next few years. Denton's
consent to Vacation Village's original application will not be construed to extend to the.
amended application for the undeveloped 'tract.., Vacation Village should apply to Amend
its certificate to include the newt tract when It is ready to begin planning the
development or e,xtension of water facilities in that tract. Denton, of°course , must be
notified of an application to ex'dand VdGation village's service area, and can protest,`if
it desires, before this Commission.
The. Commission's Engineer recommended the grant of Vacation Village's original
application and de-certification of Denton, or in the alternative, dual certification of
the area. He did not'make „a recommendat;'on regarding the undeveloped tract included in
their amended application.
this Examiner' r6COM00Adt that YaCatlon Yi,llage's driginal'applicatdon bl~griAtW
•
{i'nciuding the shoreline lots Shown in the Amehood' application map); that Dentoh rlrhain
certificated to the area sub,jeet to the notifieation,requirwOnt described above, and
that the rest of the aree''ineludad in the amendment offered at .the hearing (the
undeveloped tract) not be certificated to Vacation Village at this time One Of the
Commission's draftsmen has outlined in yellow on Vacation Village's Exhibit 3 that.area
recommended by this Examiner 'for certification to Vacation Village.
'e R .AY• ~~lG
iMage 3
i n i 'k, f.,F lc&
1, On Oecember'so 1918, Vacation 41140 s Water Company applied for a
Cart if 4 to of Convenience and Necessity to provide water service to
a subdivision in Denton County shown on' map wM 119.3-78.
2. The City of Denton holds Certificate No, 10195 to rovide water
service to the area for which Vacation Village applied.
3. On March 14, 1979, Vacation Village amended its application to
encompass additional lots and an undeveloped tract contiguous to the
subdivision for which it originally applied as shown an the map
exhibit Vacation-3.
4. Vacation Village is capable of providing adequate water service to
serve the area outlined in yellow (Original subdivision and the
contiguous lakeshors lots to the east) on map exhibit Vacation-3.
6, the City'of Denton has no water fac i11ties in the wt-dice area sought
by Vacation Village and has no plans to extend water service to the
area in the reasonably foreseeable future,
6, The public will be soeYed and accoomdated by the issuance of a
Certificate of ConVenience and Necessity to Vacation Village to
provide water service in Denton County.
1. The public interest will be served by the City of Denton remaining
dually certificated to the area'cartificated to Vacation Village if
Denton is required`to give 30 days notice to Vacation Village and
this Commission prior to the initiation of the construction of
facilities intended;by Denton to provide water service in the service
area of Vacation Village,
Con4lpsions of Law
1, Vacation Village Water Company is entitled to a Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity to provide water service to the service
area in Denton County outlined in yellow on map exhibit Vacation-3.
2. The City of Denton is entitled to remain certificated to provide
water service to the same area, subject to the notice provision in
the proposed Order.
3. The Commission has authority under Sectlon 16 of the Public Utility
Regulatory Act and Its Substantive Rule 052,02,02.031(k) to require
notice to the Commission and to affected utilities of the proposed
construction of facilities,
4, Substantive Rule 052,02.05,056(e) provides that the Commission may
grant additional certification to a utility for all or a part of an
area heretofore certificated upon . finding }hat the public
convenience and necessity esquires additional certification.
Respectfully submitted,
VICT LL BLAKEWAY
HEARINGS EXAMINER
APPROVED on the day of April, 1979.
,1i 1"', 1. .iii ,A i 'u ,r 1.• 7 <<~. ' r'-`':
DOCKET NO. 2302
APPLICATION OF:VACATION VILIA46 WATER PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION
COMPANY FOR A C ATIFICAT9 OR CONVENIENCE
ANO NECESSITY AND TO p RTIALLY DECER- OF TEXAS
TIFICATE THE CITY OF OENTbN WITHIN
0 NTON COUNTY
OROPR
In public meeting at its offices in Austin, Texas, the Public Utility Comiision of
Texas finds that, after proper statutory notice was given, the above styled and numbered
cause was heard by one of its Hearings ;Examiners, who prepared a Report containing
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which Report is hereby adopted and made a part
hereof:
IT IS THEREFORE OROEREO:
1. That Vacation Village Water Company is granted Certificate No. 11524
to provide water service in Denton County within the area outlined in
yellow on map exhibit Vacation•3.
2. That the City QQf Denton give'dotice to the Commission and Vacation
Village Water Goinpany 30 days prior to the igqitiation (by it or a
third party) of 'the construction of any facilities with which it
intends to provide water service 'within the servile area of Vacation
Village.
RENDERED AT AUSTIN,-TEXAS, on the 151:11 day of May , 1979.
PU8LIC UTILITY C011415SION OF TEXAS
SIGNED:
ROW M. COMEN
SIGNED:
SIGNED:
L R. ERWIN
• ATTEST:
PHILIP F.RIS
5ECRETARY'OF E COMMISSION
1 l 1 6
C441r
VACATION ,VILLAGE-VATER,,.C .
,,F 1, ; ;~,.•t ~~.s liuuizt' iz~{~'~' tt ,p~i~i~b'•for cer#ifirutio'rt~# ~prvU~~~~,£tttt#er
uttlt#g sip s r e t60ttigrtce ttnb ti cue # ~ f the public, ttn~
`H fort, that tho`public
i! hi bed'' , r;hb tliio fed ,
r ~.~L/Snulb i fbr# be
rib
t ,hb
of Such 70ruir e +R~ ~~~Pllrttrt# ~i0 $zztitl9 b# er gr~tt#eo
rff fi 7 j f
let
l ~
n r ww \pr fbe fntt# r ~u1if xtj4er%iUi `#tt''# tat
to rye s ire (t t~~i 6 U'41 (®rrr or
onto ttrstuzr~-ix~~bre'r> i~r (1~r~era
art on 'f # #hi~: bmmig iu''' ffi'.: {uY u textt ; ttrtb ttre
or
' •xt►Mt#Lr~ 'i3 fi~,~ztl`xeF
pxP ~n#g bode ~etu e'itu# art ttrtD t of this Grurtta to
th the Woe of fhisttt#e
vr"e
prabisuz, u#ili#g s~erit'£#r~
r ttttb
tt_~•` th -2aul o - f- this f~omntio$ton; to mig paive
old ur t~s~nb # is tllerttftctt#e
ttriiibgf t" af. ##ii ` t mmissinn #o rod
in£~s~aie'r.'tri Is~tr# u~t,att tt oulrsEsqui¢nttxfisirt tttt the pudic
tortb'e 'titmg ttnb zter' ooi#t baoul'4 ,flrg' b' 'tier' pertig~t therebg.
N
tt uf:`obe:ztber, #J79►.
It `ut ufzt' texrt,thi'g.Is# b
t., * r p
N/
r' Or .
I!+ }
/ IY+✓'hIf ~ , 1~-~ y t to
1.
11
of
l « 1 M N. f •'S 11Th 11 M .J✓ I\ T,• I.
11~Q ~y(~,. 1 ' ~ ' ~ .1 N Ylr1~'.~,♦. r ~r` M 1 ~ '1 ~ ' I f ♦ 1
,yr 1 rvlTil,~~°,y:!i, y1 I nlr r _ ,f ~~I' T M , 1 ► , ' of
~r } ~•y ~ ,r~l
,1. 1 l.- r t/ 1t N t
to .0
It It
/ ~ 1 1 \I •/k.f~ty ~~f ~~f r ~ ~ ,1 N " I 1j1 ~r5 ~f~N 1 5 1St1 ~ N
to ,`~t'fyrtl +y '~I TT' r 4` N III? 11~,. It ' l: f f t rf" 1' + Jh 1/ /
1. fJ t * / ~.f v I t
t` 71.-~vI•• ~ , 1,~ 1 „I. I• .ty1 A ` Jr ~ It 1 !I ~ I' I ~ ~
/ » ~IIJI N N N S 1,, T. -,_L!fl fi ` "Y IY I , i1 1► t' 'rC N S. r 'II✓' It
K
00 to i' .i 5 .r~;- f, 11 !1 ' h~, r'. 11 '1 nl`. 1~, ♦ 1' \ 'r ~ j ~ y ~y{ +
/ a~ .1.• Vii' 1
' i JAI , / ~ Y r••'•~- ~`l I I,~f' H., M 1' ~1 w L~.. ~ j'•~
loo,
I 5 P • ~ ,j ',l i tB lY' , ! p: r'l N1 bA y I` , I
IK f. Ili . ' ✓ , I ~If ',A I/d j1 If,,/ 1 ',1` /t
I ;
ofoI
VACAUM VILLAGE 66"!!5
tt 1+~'.. w' m~ 11 of 19 t1. 1'i • '1 tl 'I + wlllllN VW V*ots IW PL'A MI IID
;it
of WON 1 •HI
J u) t ~1 ,QF ~•Y Y
111 7 4L a
IV 0
1
dl►'F-.- Sf3t -?Gi y~
77 +1 7 , 1 , , ' 06~`,1ttT~
t A11t;YCAT1 01 +'ACAT Y PUBLIC UTILITY Coklisto
ppS~~ FA A A
"ENC N QrN p OF TE%AS
PO4 At
COUNTY R 14M
%~~RP T
Pros. ural Histor,2
On February 25, 1981, Vacation Village Sewer Compo.y (Vacation village or COM4Ay)
fl led an 4001104tion e0mosting A sewer revenue Increase of $2,982 or Six, as w11 as
watu4 revenuw increase, whiuh ApplicatJoni were assigned Docket No, 3756. On Narch S,
1981, the proposed rate increases were suspended for 120 days beyond the otherwise
effective date pursuant to General Counsel's motion, A preheaeing conference was held on
April 7, 1981, Notice of the water rate increase was given to all Interested personS,'and
numerous protests of the proposed, water increase were received, On May 21, 19!19
Vacation Village filed Its applicationt for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity
(CM for the sewer system, which application was assigned Docket No. 3888. The hearing
on the merits was conducted on June 14, 1981, with appearances entered by Mr. .4.A, uott.
on behalf of Vacation Village, )oeser's, Leon Coy and James Leighton on behalf of the
consuarri, and Mr, Steven Porter on behalf of the Commission Staff, At the hearing,
Docket No's. 3756 and 3888 were consolidated.
Subsequent to the hearing, it was discovered that the service area r""sted in
Occ%ot No, 3888 overlapped that of the City of Denton, and that proper notice of the
application had not been provided to the City of Denton, Therefore, Docket No. 3M was
. severed from Docket No. 3756. Further, at the hearing it was discover" that no nOtfce of
the proposed sewer rate increase was given, Upon Vacation Village's extension of its
proposed effective date for the sewer rate increase, the Examiner severed that portlon
from Docket No. PS6 and consolidated it with Docket No. 3868, Therefore, the Examiner's
Report and proposed Final Order, below, will deal solely with the proposed sewer rate
Increase and CCN application.
On July 20, 1981, Vacation Village filed a publisher's affidavit In support of the
sewer rate increase, Vacation Village subsequently 'filed a publisher's affidavit in
support of 'he CCN application. No additional protests or requests for hearing have been
received,
Opinion
Vacation Village 1s a partnership providing sewer service to approximately 196
residential consumers within rural Denton County, its currant rates are 52.75 per M"th
per customer, and its proposed rates are $3.75 per month per customer.
I, Certification
i
j Vacation Village has been serving the present area, consisting of a subdivision
known as Vacation Village Estates, since July 1974, The area in which it currently serves
is presently certificated to the City of Denton (City), The City was provided notice of
' i
,
r ; ' ^ T^5„"i.R°ni ~..,.-F _ 7.4° ^5Ta , fm •{Y
the co 40110etion, ehd hslw expressed no opemsition to 4411y eertiftcatin~ itself aim
V#c#tien Yillap t9 the sllbdir1~10n, Thy' V4401aft 011490 syst" conslsill of SOW 1ide4
which connect to a `lift station a+i disposal system owned 40 QW41led by the City,
Therefore, Vacation Village is 1Oequ4;tinq clrtiflcation of the lines in the subdivision,
but not the lift station and treatment plant, The Staff, fngineer reeoeaaeQded that
114cation Village oe dually certifIWO to the Vacation V1114ge Estates subdivision,
S1nce it is the only utility having sewage disposal lines in place in the subdivision, and
sinoc the City perform% the aotu4l treatment of the sewage and has no objection to the
proposed certification, the Examiner finds that it it necessary to the service,
acowoclatlon, convenlence, and safety of the public that Vocation Village be granted a
certificate allowing It to provide Sewer lines to the Vacation Village Estates
subdivision pursuant to TE%,REV,CiV,STAT,ANN, art, 1446c, 04 119E+01.
2. Allocation of Rate Base and Expenses
As Stated above, Vacation Village is a partnership servinq a subdivision consistinq
of 196 Consumers. Adjacent to that subdivislon is a mobile home area consisting of 46
consumers which is owned by one of the partners who owns Vacation Village, Vacation
Village supplies rawer service to these mobile homes at no charge, although It 4ppears
that rent is adjusted to Include $ewer service supplied to the hoaws, None of this
revenue is received by Vacation Village, however.
The Staff eecommended that rate base and expenses be reduced by 19% to account for
that portion of the system used to service the mobile home park discussed above, Another
possible way, to deal with the situation would be to offset revenue requirement to account
for those consumers, Nowevur, the area is not metered, and it may not be possible to
mater because the system is looped, and gallonage consumed in that area is therefore not
possible to calculate, As a result, the Examiner recommends that the Staff's proposed
methodology be adopted.
The consumers disagreed with the delotion of 19% of rate base and expenses related
to the mobile horse park because they disputed the number of residences within the mobile
home lot, There is no evidence that the number used by the Staff 's Incorrect, Further,
the Staff's allocation methodology was approved by the Commisslon in the companlon case
to this docket, Application of Vacation Village Water Company for a, Rate Incrpt , Docket
No. 3156, 7 P.M. BULL, ,Y, (August 4, 1981), The Examiner therefore recommends
adoption of the Staff's methodology in this docket,
3. Invested Capital
Vacation Village's original cost of plant In service of $150,071 and accumulated
depreciation of $170411 -meet reduced by 19% by the Staff Accountant to produce a net
original cost of 1107,465. To net plant was added 5528, representing one-eighth of the
Staff's recommended opeedtlons and maintenance expense, to produce a total invested
capital of $107,983, The Examiner finds the Staff Accountant's calculations to be
reasonable, and 'recommends a total invested capital of $107,983,
the,'Staff enji'eer, calculated `a composite deoreciatlon rate of 2411l111 for the
system, which he eat"eendad'be'soolled to all property now.awnad by the Ca p'any, His
recommended depreciation rate produced an annual expense of $2,402 when applied to the
.r z 1 P~ +a ,n nj.gti.pe y,T,
~k 7M
Mt `plant a1lowgd abeVe, , Mor 411 J11101e 4441400d in the future, the Staff ln~ineer
recooft6ded that Vocation V0,142e use the deo0e0letIon rites set forth on the ottached
Exhibit i. The exiolew concurs with the Staff Ingineer's eecOMAdatfoo.
4. Return '
To calculate the appropriate return on Inv+sted capital for Vacation V M 410, the
Staff Accountant used a weighted cost of Capital Aporoach, She determined from an
examin4tion of the Company's books that Vacation Village is Composed of 1009 equity.
While there are Some funds nwod by the Company to thu pArtners, the "ClO W are lon•
interest bearing with no set date for principal payments, Vacation Village's witness
testifled that neither principal nor interest was paid during the test period, and that
no payments are likely to be made in the near future, Therefore, the Staff Accountant
chose to consider the notes as equity rather than debt.
i
She computed the cost of equity by using the average annual prime interest rate for
the period April 1980 through March 19nl and adding two percentage Points to recognize
the Increased risk of a water utility operation. Ner recommended cost of equity, and
invested Capital, was determined to be 17.99%, for an annual return of $19,426. The
Examiner finds the Staff Accountant's recons Mation to be reasonabt• and therefore
recommends its adoption.
5. Cost of Service
The Staff Accountant made the following adjustments to the Company's requested cost
of service,
1; Y e"•" Qi~e~ STAFF
Tes"st Per, a
Description _Amount Amount Adjustments Recommend; ons
Salary and Wages S - S • S 693 (a) S 693
Utilities 88 (b) 88
Office Supplies - 90 c 90
Regulatory Expense 350 d 350
Accounting and Legal 66 a 66
Miscellaneous Expense 3,948 3,630 (690 f 2,940
Depreciation 3,002 3,002 (600) 19) 2,402
Payroll Taxes - 49 (h) 49
P.U.C, Assessment 44 1) 44
Return (11112) 2,188 17,2J8 J) 19,426
Revenue Requirement 5 5,838 -$8- $17,323 S 26.148
(a) Salaries and wigos The' Company requested that all salaries and wages bP
allocated to the water operations in Docket No. 3756, In that case, to:,'
expenses were reduced by 19%, and 85% of the remainder was al',ocated to the
water company." Therefore, the Staf+ Accountant recommended that the remaining
15% be allocated to the sewer company.
{b} Utilities The Staff Accall0t4nt allocated 169 ' Of the 111ow01e utility
expense incurred by the water and sewer companies in 19800 annuall:ed to
reflect the rate increase granted to Texas Power and Light Company its mrlst
recent rate case and reduced by 19%, to the sewer company,
(c) Office Supplies The Staff Accountant reduced the requested amount for the
water and sewer companies by $230 as not suffi iently known and measurable. A
further 19% was deleted and 15% of the remainder was allocated to the sewer
company.
(d) Regulatory Expense The total requested amount for the water and sewer
companies was allocated 50% to the sewer company and amortized over two years,
(e) Accounting and Legal The total amount for both the water and Sewer companies
was reduced by 19%. Of the remaining expense, 15% was allocated to the sewer
compao
(f) Miscellaneous The requested amount was reduced by 19% to allocate costs
between utility and non-utility customers,
(g) Depreciation the Staff Accountant utilized the amount recommended by the
Staff £nginaer in Section 3, invested Capital, above,
(h) Payroll Taxes The Staff Accountant recommended payroll taxes based on the
amount of salaries and waq,s assigned to the sewer company,
(1) P,U,C, Assessment The Staff Accountant recommended inclusion of ,1667% of
the Staff's recommended cost of service,
(S) Return The Staff Accountant Included the amount recommended in Section 4.
Return, above,
the Examiner finds the Staff Accountant's recommended cost of service of $26,148 to be
reasonable. However, pursuant to Commission policy, she recommends that Vacation Village
be limited to its requested cost of service of $8,820,
6, Rate Design
As stated above, Vacation Village's current rates are $2,75 per customer and Its
requested rates are $3.75 per customer, The Staff Engineer computed rates of 111,12 per
month, based on the Staff's recommended cost of service, However, since the Company is
limited to its requested cost of service, the Staff £nginwer recommended that the sewer
rate be set at the requested level of 53.75 per month, The Examiner concurs with the
Staff Engineer's recommendation, .
11, m- , t . I,
flndine's of fact
1. On h6ruaty ZsM, :1941, V u atl" 411149e Sewer Comp4ny (Vacation
4111494 Or COM00Y) filed an 001144tion rtcu/sting a revenue
Increase of $2,982 or 15%, which was assigned Docket No, 3756,
2. On march 6, 19811 the proposed effective date was suspended for 120
days pursuant to General Counsels motio»,
3, On May 21, 1981, VaCatlon V11169e filed its application for a
Certlflcate of COOYfit10041 and NeCe sity (CCN) for its sewer r
operations, which application was assigned Docket No, 1888,
44 Proper notice of the rate Increase was given,
5. Proper notice of the CCN application was given, and no parties
protested the appllu tion,
6. the sewer rate increase was severed from Docket No. 3756 and
consolidated with the CCN application contained in Docket No, 3888.
7, Vacation Village Is a partnership providing seer service to
approxiaWtely 196 residential consumers within rural Denton County.
8, Vacation Village's current rates are $2,75 per customer per month.
9, Vacation Village is provldlnq sewer service to a mobile home area
consisting of 46 customers at no charge.
10, Vacation Village has been providing Vacation Village Estates with
sewer service since July 1974,
It. The area in which Vacation Village serves is presently certificated to
the City of Denton (City).
12, The City has expressed no opposition to the CCN application.
13, Vacation Village owns sewer lines only, while the City provides the
lift station and sewage treatment.
14, Vacation Village is the only utility with sewer lines In place In the
area in question,
15, It Is reasonable to reduce rate base and expenses by 19% to account
for water supplied to the customers the subject of Finding of Pact
Number 9.
16. Vacation Village has net value of plant in service of 5107,455,
consisting of original cost of 5121,558 and accumulated depreciation
of $14,103
17, Vacation Village has an inveeted capital of $107,983 consisting of net
plant of $107,455 and working capital of $523.
-77 ~ y R 71
' 1 ,r
la, It If r4404n410 for vacation villile to apply a deprlciitIgo rate, Of
1,111%, for an annual 4 plnfl of 52,409, to all pr"*rty It now OM$
W to 601y the depreolo ion' total fat forth on Exhibit I to all
property acquired In the future.
19, vacation Villages capital structure is composed of 100% equity, when
outstanding "debts" owed to the Company's owners which bear no
Interest and no set dates for principal payments are treated as equity
rather than debt,
20, A rate of return of 17,99%, for an annual return of $19,425, is
reasonable for vacation village,
21, vacation Village has a cost of servlce of =251148, the components of
which are set forth in the Examiner's Report, However, pursuant to
Commission policy, Vacation Village should be limited to its
requested cost of servlce of =8,820.
22. A rate of $3.15 per customer per month Is reasonable for Vacation
Village.
C4A41,4020%. of 1,1W
1. The COMMission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to TEX,
REV, CIV. STAT, ANN. art, 1446c, 5316, 37, $3 and $4 (1980),
2. The Company is entitled to charge the rates set forth in Finding of
Fact Number 22.
3, Vacation Village should be ordered to apply the depreciation rates set
forth in Finding of Fact Number 18, pursuant to TEX,REV.CIV.STAT,ANN,
art. 1446c, $27 (1980),
4, It IS necessary for the servlce, accommodation, convenience, or
safety of the public that Vacation Village be granted a Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity to provide sewer service to the area known
as Vacation Village Estates shown on Map Exhiblt 8 attached to the
application In this docket,
Respectfully submitted,
aa"
HEARINGS EXAMINER
APPROVED on this the rr~ day of p_ 1981,
"'OJT
';:;ECTOR OF HE INGS
a t 2
ht' ,a e.a@YiY .C:IL ~$81Y28 4~. e
. "tewfR SYM14
RECOMMENOCO OEPRWATiON RATES
c
Account Account Se v CI r•
No, I1 _ Llf •Yr 941:64
324 Pump(a soo ter 30 3.333
((b Wei •$HP & less S 201040
(C +411-NHP 6 up 10 10,000
331 Misc. Plant s0 2,000
332 Gas C120 Chem. Feed 20 51000
4ypoghl0riO&tor 10 10,000
3456 Meterf, Services 20 5.000
352 Collection System s0 2.000
321.361 Strv tunes
9Se Masonry 30 3.333
(b~ Hood 20 1.000
370 Land
391 furniture, fixtures 10 10.000
392 Vehicles $ 20.000
394 Shop Tools 1s 6.667
395 Lab Equipment 10 10.000
396 Heavy Equipment 10 10.000
397 communication Equipment 10 10.004
' v .e+v~ ~t-i ~•n-p `,IUI,~•s~ 1wn ~ry~~ trV1M1r11~r n51~ ~ T twn ~ IRT ~1.+1•.+ .f..,
APO I'
ACC R. QrI►~at 1 TI PueLic uttLtrr` Cawc;s;aN
i~NiC,t ~rttwttEA ` OF TEXAS
E t►~CRGSE vt~i ~r~ aENraN
cntx~rr
ONOER
!n publ14 meeting at Its offices in Austin, Texas, the Public Utility Coavwjjton of
i Texas find; that after Statutory 'notice was provided to the public and Interested
persons, the above styled application was heard by an Examiner who filed ! eeporr
containing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which Examiner's Report is sdooted
and made d part hereof, The Commission further Issues the !ollowinq Order;
1. The application of vacation VI11490 Sewer Company for a rate increase
is GAA4TEO as set forth in finding of 'Fact 'Number U.
2. Vacation Village Sewer Company is ORDERED to apply the depreciation
rates set forth In Finding of Fact Number 1$,
3, vacation Village Sewer Company is hereby OAANTEO Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity Number 20$66 to provide sewer service to the
area known as vacation Village Estates, set forth on Map Exhibit
attached to its application in this docket, as requested.
4. Vacation Village is OROEREO to file a tarif,' reflecting this -jLea
granted herein within twenty (20) days of this Order.
ISSUED AT AUSTt!;, TEXAS, on this 16th day of September 1~S1.
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF rEXAs
SIGNEOo
GEORGE M. MOEN
SIGNEO
SIGNED;
1
A TEST:
5ECRETARY Of HE COMMISSION
sb/ac
ri7. 1 .'Z r 1 . / J o if`y. ✓i I 1 r.~r,jC;;.a
77, 7177T
77.
miD06e"PuOlis otilities Board
} Au0st 29, 1944
Paso 2
4. A>~ PROVIDING WATEK/SXWER SERVICE TO DENTON 'COUNTY
"''6 gD74i~ f'"XAtf"1tON .-Y ~'Sb' "t~a`#tl
cal L, V, -EAST _-MCKIPINEY
TES
-16
Has reviewed this item stating the area is not certified to
be served by Vacation Village, The Developer will pay for
all costs of extensions, The Staff recommends that the
Board should not support the petition for service by
Vacation Village,
The Developer will accept the Boa'rd's recommendation that
(1) Cite City provide both water and wastewater service to
the proposed developmont', and (2) the Developer will pay
all coats of line extensions and other costs normally
associated with such development and service extension,
Herrin aaad~t a motion to accept the Staff recommendation
p
roviding soot t re the Developer pays all costs. Laney amended
the It n~ by stating approval should be subject to
engineering analysis. Second by Coomes, Five ayes, no,
nayes, motii6a carried.
54
DE 5IDf:R ' ANITARY EWER bFMAIN FOR JO STORM HONES DIMENSION
_'"bEf~'l'ON=~tt309StSlCf L7►'1'6'~'l`X'r'E
CRUM$
Ham inLroduced this item stating the City would pay for
overaixing the 8" x 15" line (8,8201-), save a total of
appproximately $198,000. The construction cost for a large
L 13ne (24';'), would he $420,000. Thompson requested we
coropsre Costs of first-on-line fees to consumapption fees,
Cobme s ,re',4uested to see hard cost figures. Tk s item was
!,&bled, ' 116, action ttken.
lip.
F
f PA k4wt 9/lV"
H. Consider providing Meter " sewer service 'outside
Denton city limits to Jay-Max Additions lot 10 block 1.
Mr. Ham stated this,-is a request for water and sewer
outside the city limits of Denton, The Joy'^*r Addi-
tion is a small devOopment of light industrial machine
shop and oommercial_office space proposed on FM Road
2181 (South Teasley Lane) ad scent to Old Alton Church.
He stated therepresently exist* an 8 inch water line
and a 15 inch sanitary sewer line which have very re-
cently been!cohstructed by the Hickory Creek Mobile
Home Park deyioper 'in this area. He stated Jay-Mar
Addition propo os to',',pay pro rata charges in order
to tie on to tlo adjacent sanitary sewer lines and
since FM Road 2.81 is a state highway, they propose to
tie on and bore underneath this road to the 8 inch
water line `Across the frontage of their prop~rty on
the south side of P Road 2181. He stated the Public
Utility Board rocomw4nds approval
on question from Alr. ,;laiborne, Mr. Ham stated yes,
the water lire a17:,,.
ireaf; lIP exists.
r Mr. Sidor commented he sees no reason not to recommend
approval.
Mr. Sidor wade a motion to recommend approval to consi-
der providing water and sewer tarvioo outside Denton
city limit's to Jay-*r Addition, lot 1, block
Seconded by Mr. goo" and carried unanimously 'p-O).
i. Consider providing water and sewer, service to West
Lake North/South Addition (formerly Denton County
North Mobile Subdivision and Denton County South
Mobile Subdivision) on East McKinney Street adjacent
to vacation Village Estates.
Mr. Ham stated Homecraft Development Services, Inc.
has requested Dentoh-sewer service for the purpose of
r their new development. He `stated Homecraft did not
request per*isision to tie'into'the City of Denton water
services instead expkessed~-a desire to be served by the
Vacation Village Watfz Coipany..'Ho.stated 'the'develop-
ment s'to be oonstructed;on East McKinney, Street.
adjacent to Vaaation';villagga Estates. He stated this
pro Oct is 552 lots.and wi~;l consist essentially of
mobile home iites tormed.as manufactured housing and
at the present time Adequate water and sanitary sewer
facilities do not exist in this area except for water
wells serving Vacation Village;Estatess which are not
adequate for these two new subdivisions and some
capacity does remain on the sanitary sewer lift stations
which would be inadequate for these two new subdivisions.
He for rther stated since the Public vtility Board met
on August 15, 1984, the uti.lity,'stiff has detaftined
that the sewer loading of the new, development would
require i4rovements`to the exiating lift station-with
a new forced main and a new gravity line to serve this
~ i = 'Ml~►ake•
tege ~
rapooed dbvelopftnt. IN addit.ipn; the utility ;qo-
rtmsnt staff would recoftend tbat this new sub"
div' ision development be served •by extending A. water
line from Mayhili Road down McKinney Street to this
now developments The miss of this water line should
beet least a 12" *is*, He further stated any over-
sizing or sewer extensions w.11 be borne by the de-
veloper,
Mrs 'LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval to
consider provide, water and seder service to West Lake
Noith/South Addition `(formerly Renton County 'North
And Denton South Mobile Subdivision) on Em#t McKinney
Street adjacent to Vacation Village Estato5. Seconded
by Mr. Sscue and unanimously carried (7-0),
~~b d~'` 'n; ~'l'ir 1 -_8i',• too L~' f ~ \ .V1 Y` i;r