Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-16-1984
C ITY COUNCIL A GENDA 10"m 164074 ILI v AQZNDA CITY Off' DkNTON CITY COUNCIL October 16,1984 Work Session of the Cl.ty of Denton City Council on Tuesd~iy, October 16, 1984 at 2:OC p.m. at the Municipal Building at which the following item will be considered; 2 00 p.m. 1. Depavt for tour of Lake R?►y Roberts const-uetion site, Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesd,qy , October 16, 1184, at S SO p.m, ,in ' he Civil Defenso Room of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered 5:30 p.m, 1. Discussion of proposed five (5) ac-e office development and general development plan for 70 arse site located in the extra territorial jur sdiction (adjacent and north of Highway 380 west And west of Masch Branch Road) for the purpose of detarmi.ning whether to begin the annexation process. 2. Discussion of the ordinance setting fire inspection and permit fees. 3. Discussion of a st oet bond election, 4. Executive Session: A, Leggal Matters Under See, 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 8. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2{g), Art 6252-17 V .A T,S. D. Borg:-d Appointments Under Sac, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 16, 1984, at 7,00 p.m, in the Council C'1ambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7,00 p.m. i 1. Consider Approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of July 24, 1984; the Special Called Meeting of July 31, 1984; the Regular Meeting of August 7; and the Special Called Meeting of August 13, 1984. ~c'iky of Denton City Council Agenda October 16, 1984 Page Two 2. Consent Agenda: Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the b4stA of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the Lity Manager or his dosignee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations A. Purchase Orders: 1. Purchase Order 11 65~81A to George Stracener in the amount of $5, 00.00 2. Purchase Order # 65197 to Mahanay International in the amount of $3,658.95 3. Purchase Order A 65263 to J. S. Equipment Company in the amount of $6.320.97 i B. Plats and Replats; 1. Consider app-oval of the preliminary plat of the Dallas Drive Mini Stor..age Addition. The . Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Consider approval of the preliminary re lat of the Milton Court Addition, lot 1., block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of the preliminary replat of Sun Valley Addition, lot 13, block A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends apps-oval.) 4. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of Southridge Ill. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Consider approval of the final replat of the Guy Laney Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Hartman Acres Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) . 3. Receive a report from the Committee on Employment of the Handicapped. City of Denton' city Council Agenda Agtober 16, 198+ Page Three 4. Consider approval of the request by the Miller girls of Denton to paint the wall on Bonnie 8r.ae and Scripture. 5. Public Hearings: A. 2,1684, This is the petition of W, S. Nash requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned develo ent (P ptn D) classification on e 44.1 acre tract located on the east side of FM 2164 (North Locust Street) approximately 5,600 feet north of Hercules Street. The tract is more particularly described as immediately adjacent and west of Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park, If approved, the planned development will permit the construction of a 198 lot mobile home subdivision. (The Planning and Zoning Commission r.ecommen6a denial,) 8. Z-1691, This is the petition of Bob Crouch requesting a change in zoning from the aggricultural (A) district to the light industrial (LI) district on an approximately 20 acre parcel located on the north side of Fishtrap Road, approximately 2,400 'feet east of T & P, H KT Railroad. The property is more particular) described as lots 1-1.6 of the Meadow Lark Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) . 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the light industrial (LI) district on an approximately 20 acre parcel described as lots 1-16 of the Meadow Lark Addition. C. Z-1692. This is the petition of Charles Watkins, rep-r-esenting Karl F. Young, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the commercial (C) district on two trects totaling 18.8 acres located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 2500 feet south of East McKinney Street (FM 426). The property is loc,,ated directly across"1~op 288 from the eastern extension of Morse Str'2 : (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) City of Denton City Council Agenda October 16, 1984 . Page Four D. Z-1694. This is the petition of R. W. G. P., lnc,, represented by Curtis Hodgson requestin a change in zoning from the agricultural g(A) district to the planned development' (PD) district on an approximately 17.1 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Paige and Swisher Roads. If approved, the planned development will permit 18 single family lots '(minimum lot size 7,000 square feet) along the south side of Paige Road and 11 single family estate lots (minimum lot size one acre) along the west ide of Swisher Road, ('The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) R. 4-1695. This is the petition of R. W. G. P., 1R. represented by Curtis Hodgson, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) district on a 49.4 acre tract in tihe Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. The property is located on the north side of Shady Shores Road approximately 250 feet west of Swisher Road. If approved, the planned development will permit the development of a 275 lot manufactured housing subdivision. ('The Planning and Zoning Commission recommen-As approval.) 6. Ordinances: A. Consider adoption of an ordinance approvingg a change: in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and SY-16) zoning classifications to the planned development (PD) classification on an 83,2 acre tract located on the east and west sides of Lillian Miller Parkway beginning approximately 1,000 feet south of Interstate Highway 35E (Z-1682). B. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to planned development (PD-6) on a 58.2 acre tract located on the south side of Colorado Boulevard approa,imate ly 1, 500 feet northwest of Loop 288 (Z-1674). C, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification on a 52.9 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Bonnie Brae Street and Payne Drive (Z-1688), -City of pentor; `ptty'Cc~u~cc i A,,fiend. October lb; 1984 page rive D. Consider ndogtion of 'an ordinance repealingg Articl,q X1 of .0hapter 25 of the Code of Ordinano„s; enacting a new Article II of Chapter 25 of tl}e Code of ` Ordinances to provide for the establishing of •sates, charges, fees, deposits, bLlli.nis and procedures for providing electrical service 1)y ordinance; and declaring an effective dace, E, Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing rates, charges, fees, deposits, billings and procedures for providing electrical services by the City to its customers; providing a severability clause; and providing for an effective date. (The `Public Utilities Board recommends approval,) F. Consider a..loption of an ordinance repealing Article III and IV of Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances; enacting a new Article III of Chapter 25 of the Code of'Ordinances to provide for.the establishing of rates, charges, fads, deposits, billings and procedures for providing water and sewer service by ordinance:, and declaring an effective date. 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing rates, charges, fees, deposits, billings and procedures for providing water and sewer services by the City to its customers; providing for a severability clause; and providing for an effective date, (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval,) 7. Consider approval of final payment for the Lillian Miller Parkway (Ridgeway Drive) paving and drainage improvements in the amount Of $55)894.69. (Bid # 9209) 8. Discussion of the overrun on the Handi Hop contract. 9. Official Action on Executive Session Items; A. Ldgal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 10. New Business; . This itec; provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 1528C 1 C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting wa, posted on the bulletin boar at the City Hall of the City of De ton, Texa3, on the day of ~i► 1984 at _i o' mock (a.m.) p,m. ~r Aa NDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL October 16, 1984 Work Session of the Uty of Denton Ctty Council on :'uosd,ay, O;tober 16, L984 at 2;00 p.m, at the Mtanici.pal Building at which the following item will be co'nsidcred: 2 00 P.M. i. Depa"t for tour of LAko P.iiy Roberts consl:-ucti.ori sirrl, Work Session of thO City of Denton City Council on Tuesdr.1yy, Octobos- 16, 1184, cat 5 JO p.m. in 1-he Civil. Defense Room of rhr, Munto ipaI Building at which the following items wi'L1 be considered 5:30 p•m. 1. Discussion of proP0,4od five (5) ac e office development and general development plan for 70 acre site located in tho extra •te.rritorial iur ediction (adjacent and north of Highway 380 west and west of Masch Branch Road) for the purpose of detormini.ng whether to begin the annexation process. 2, Discussion of the ordincince setting fi+-o inopecr.ion -,nd permit fees. 3. Di.SCUSSiot1 of a st coot bond r.l.ectton. 4. Executive Session: A. Leggal Matters Under Sec, 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V. T.S. B. Real Estate - Undr-,r Sec. 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V. A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V,A T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Soc. 2(g), Arr. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Reguiar Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, October 16, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Gounnil C+tambors of the Municipal Building at which the following items wi1.1 be considered; 7:00 p.m. 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Special. Callt~d Meeting of July 24, 1984; the Special Culled Meeting of July 31, 1984; the Regular Meeting of August 7; and the Special Called Meeting of August 13, 1984. City of Oonton City Council Agenda October 16, 1984 Page Two 2. Consent Agenda; Each of these items is recommended by the Staff And approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommo ndations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the Ci.t;y Manago r or his desi.gno.e to tem in accordance with the Staff implement each item' r.ecommendattons. A. Purchase Orders; 1. Purchase Order ll 6518LA to George Stracener in the amount of $5.600.00 2. Purchase Order # 65197 to Mahanny International in the amount of $3,658.95 3. Purchase. Order N 65263 to J. S. Equipment Company in the amount of $6,320.y7 B. Plats and Replats; 1. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Dallas Drive Mini Stoi,age Addition. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Consider approval of the preliminary replrtt of the Milton Court Addition, lot 1, block 1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of the preliminary replat of Sun Valley Addition, lot 13, block A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends applovai.) 4. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of Southridge III. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Consider approW, of the final replan of the Guy Laney Audition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends ipproval,) 6. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Hartman Acres Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 3. Receive a report from the Committee on Employment of the Handicapped. 77.7 1 City of Denton City Council Agenda Uctobex 16, 1984 Page Three 4, Considor approval of the request by the Miller girls of Denton to paint the wall on Bonnie Brno and Scripture, 5. Public Hearings; A. Z-1684, This is the petition of W. S. Nash requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to tho planned development (PD) Class iftention on a 44.1 acrd tract located on the east side of. FM 21.64 (North Locust Street) approximately 5,600 feet north of Hercules Street. The tract is more particularly described as immediately adjacent and west of 'rwin Lakes Mobile }come Park, if approved, the planned development wil.1 permit the const1-uctton of a 198 lot mobile home subdivision. (Tile Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial.) B. Z-16910 This is the petition of Bob. Crouch requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the light industrial ( 1) district on an approximately 20 acre parcel located on the north side of Fishtrap Road, approximately 2,400 foot east of T & P, MKT Railroad, The property is more Articularly described as lots 1-16 of the Meadow Lark Addition, (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval.) 1. Consider adoption of nn ordinance approvin a change in zoning from tho, agricultural (A district to the light industrial (LI district on an approximately 20 acre parcel described as lots 1-16 of the Meadow Lnrk Addition. C. Z-1692, 'Chis is the petition of Charles Watkins, representing Karl F. Young, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the commercial (C) district on two tracts totaling 18.8 acres located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 2500 feet south of East McKinney Street (FM 426). The property is located directly across Loop 288 from the eastern extension of Morse Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.,) III, ~ - - r i i City of. Denton City Council Agenda October 16, 1984 Page Four D. Z»1694, This is the petition of R. W, G, >wnos,rrepresented by Curtis Hodgson requesting a change in zoning from the ngricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) district on an approximately 17.1 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Paige and Swisher Ronds. If approved, the planned development will permit 18 single family lots (minimum lot size 7,000 square feet) along the south side of Paige Road and 11 single family estate lots (minimum lot size one acre) along the west side of Swisher Road. (The Planning and 7,oning Commission recommends approval.) 8. 4-1695. This is the petition of R. W. G. P., Inc.7represented by Curtis Hodgson, requestin a cha,,;o in zoning from the agricultural district to the planned development (PD) district on a 49.4 acre tract in the Gideon Walker Survey, Abstract 1330. The property is located on the north side of Shady Shores Road a pri~xi.mately 250 feet west of Swisher Road, If approved, the planned development will permit the development of a 275 lot manufactured housing subdivision. ('The Planning and Zoning C;ommi.ss9.on recommends approval.) 6. Ordinances; A. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving n change in zoning from the single family (SF-10 and SF-16) zoning classifications to the planned development (PD) classification on an 83,2 acre tract located on the east and west sides of Lillian Miller Parkway beginning approximately 1,000 feet south of Interstate Highway 358 (Z-1682). B. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an amendment to planned development (PD-6) on a 58.2 acre tract located on the south side of Colorado Boulevard approximately 1,500 fret northwest of Loop 288 (Z-1674). C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a change in zoning from the agricultural tA) to the planned development (PD) classification on a 52.9 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Bonnie Brae Street and Payne Drive (7,-1688). City of Denton City Council Agei?da October 16, 1984 Page Five D, Consider adoption of an ordinance repealing Article II of Cheptfr 25 of the Code of Ordinances; enacting a now Article II of Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for the establishing of rates, charges, fees, deposits, billings and procedures for providing electrical service by ordinance; and declarirg an effective date, E. Consider adoption of an ordinance vstablishi.ng rates, charges, fees, deposits, billings and procedures for providing electrical services by the. City to its customers; providing a severability clause; and providing for no effective date. (The Public Utilities Beard recommends approval.) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance reppaling Article 'III and IV of Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordir:ancec; Einacting a new Prticle III of Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for the establishing of rates, charges, fens, deposits, billings and procedures for providing water and sewer service by ordinance and declaring an effective date, G. Consider ado- -ion of an ordinance establishing rates, cha,;,°,ea, fees, deposits, billings +111ri procedures for providing water and sewer servi.cas by the City to its customers; providing for a severability claus,a; and providing for en effective date. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) 7. Consider approval of final payment for the Lillian Mille: Parkway (Ridgeway Drive) paving and drainage improvements in the amount of $851894.69. (Bid # 9209) 8. Discussion of the overrun on the Haridi Hop contract. 9. Official Action on Executive Session Items; A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel U. Board Appointments 10. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 15280 t CITY OF U4NTON MEMURAND'M DATE: October 10, 1984 Tot G» Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: uavid Ellison, Senior Planner SU8JEM DISCUSS10N OF PRUPUHEU FIVE (5) ACRE UVFICE DEVELOP- MENT AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 70 ACRE SITE LOCATED IN THE EXTRATERRI'T'ORIAL JURISDICTION (NORTH 00 3$0 WEST AND WEST OF MASCH BRANCH ROAD) FOR THE PURPOSE of, DETERMINING WHETHER To 13EGIN THE ANNEXA- TION PROCESS The proposed Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition is a five (5) acre site located fifty (50) feet south of the Denton city limits line extending along Highway 380 west. Development of a con- struction office facility is the immediate proposed land use. Tri-Steal owns approximately seventy (70) acres beginning at the northwest corner of Highway 380 West and Masch Branch Road. A general development plan has been submitted for the entire seventy acre parcel at the request of the Development Review Committee (Attachment #2). The information provide' at this Lima concerning future development is limited at best (Tri- Stee.l .bas indicated possible light industrial use at some point future, but has emphasized that no immediate plans for develop- ment b"YOnd the five acre office site exists). The Denton Development Guide designates this area as low intensity. permisslion has been granted to extend and tie onto City of Denton public utility facilitiias (approval by Public Utilities Board, Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council). A preliminary plat in general conformance with city of Denton requirements has been submitted for the proposed otfice site. - , 7- 7 a. chris Hartung ootober 10, 1984 Page 2 uevelopment Review Committee processing of the preliminary plat ana general aevelopntent plan is underway and, it annexa- tion is ieconunended, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council can approve a plat Uy resolution prior to final annexation action, Tri-Steel Structures, Inc, considered the alternative of locating their oftice facility on a portion of tide tract currently in the city limits. This option was not chosen when the tact that a change in zoning woulu tie neeaea was communicated. ~ Z bs! n ~ 5av d E 11son sm Attachments 0475s llk~r► ~Irla ' 1-00 BURKE ENGINEERING Psi* t6o CONSULTING CIVIL 1JNQINk1R4 20 Sept 198'4 Mr. David Ellison Senior P.lannor City of Denton, Texas RE: Tri.-Steel Addition General Development Plan Dear David: The enclosed information is consistent with our understanding of what the Subdivision Reguldtions require for a General Development Plan, We have talked to our client about the specific land uses they anticipate; how- ever, it'is very difficult to plan for the whole 69 acres since owner- ship could change before development occurs. We have studied the Denton Development Gui de , which shows Low Intensity land use for this area. Nevertheless, our client believes that Office Zoning blends harmoniously with the surrounding Moderate to Nigh Intensity land use projected for this area in the Guide, and has asked us to pursue Office Zoning for at least the 5 acre lot shown inside the 69 'acre tract of land. We believe that due to the unpredictability in the development of the whole 69 acre tract, committing to specific land uses could inhibit the devel- opment potential of this property, 'T'herefore, we propose Light Industrial use for the remaining portion of this property, because we regard it as the highest intensity use likely to occur here, The drainage calculations have been codified to reflect the input from the City Engineering Office, Ploase contact us if we may furnish additional information, Sincerely, ,L PabloWdb o 400 CARROLL BLVD. M 102 (417) $46-4714 0914TONO Taus 74201 i t>rM M rwna 1 . cow" w I1Rflg1 1 1101t1'CIr1r11 ltt wltApa 1" «t >IMqRNII 10 the *"Of e Met NtNl6 "keel of 162,4 •Ifw16 *f iy"~tl•tte S •11 e tlri10 c6l100 tN i n 1e, ►wlN Coil it TOrN, wf hel" e / el cif l el Is J•46 fetid."" retetAeA li wfIt we o'a t • MM too bores, it ft. oP nrnlnR Cwntf, ?0060 M 1000 "to fw ot t►e te1H at+t►r / 1 w1A !rest M Nre o tow 6f1Y 016 Ow O Ore* 0 MIMM YM forlrthe the me[thetot Cerrlaret of the feet 4.100 nNerl We1A It IMA too ost ♦ t 116 of t4f Atilt Oro" 41~~ as Owwrom 1oeN nAfhi test 11Mit/k0.rAa A14104 ~Arai the r{b•N1MCeeN them, eiit / "beet"o 13 no "meat 66S M It ! 11N a w lr wefeeh. wt e1 t4 the ENt tt.• of tM ~O \ Itn6 relt Net for the 1 Meeeh oreech L64 6 AUTAneA of /«,a0 hM / aI,WM•NI CeM it of the hotels ~rttge treed 1w I 16"110 so4th *1 11~I r1NH 110"106 ft teeooltA rat 6ete•4 t!• (Otto ore" Tres \ •j At 614440 1f{he I f Otte to" t06 I1 Al tr 1":1 0101boett, ito jlt0•tN Iti loot 1.606 1of fMlrea k P• 1A the eenlet 1106 of the e4ld btlNeA ter IM lStlUSe41 forMr of the Alnlo A / evf to tr6rtl Mdr `t • % / • I .Ir •l le~r~-C 711bK'► lhrrlY lop the 010 rY Atloth the tello►fnY fetlt% ••i0der r►tfA" " •1 n , , "1 ' I, Morth ll. neR rtt6 07 klnutN M If'l 4,06, W 11 fltend6 efe t 6 ''titenet of 111,30 lost / 1, Nor1A !0 btO Ales tV7 MInu1N Of Atton,% test 6 A14itnee el I32,00 fret 71 r 1 r ,h i 1 A J, XnrIA At ireflrep IR MIAUtH S/ leeon"* Y.•( i 03110ne• of IOe,M feat I 7 / 1 •r' ' 1, worth !1601tot4 11 Mlnulte !0 a•COAAe tot I dl•toill of 111,10 test 0 a ~ ~ North It rtes R NN fAlle•0 M~ i' ' /t H Io 1 net 1 kinnt« OR aeeen A4 week • Autuee or 1,l,01 _ le 1 rotnl for the Motkh►Nt Cotner of the POW" ",tolitiboo trlotl feet! •~LL ~~~~'~~a, 0 ACMEO ~ "--y_I--~r1_`r'1•-II t~0 Xerth to r, a Jt wlna l6A f1 Q" 1 "Coned test fee•iA0 the 66101 Art hre0ee, Q / I \le ! OfAh111C aCAIE no Pee6100 at Se; }t/1,1n trot roll Nl et the 44AL thereof eeM eontlnalr 1 li f l IA the epe eoltrlel It 011, i IeUI AIAfNCe of JfO,N tee! to Pft OY u J ~i \ \ /.•I InA lnclefln( R,eM elfN of lend, a / 000, I1f YAt Mat r "NOM ALL fa01 AT 171Rar MIsiR11f11 1 • ~ .v p~p^Yeri J•H l.o, 1~jL,~Ml hereby ON l this a Ai lit +erlorallm0 tht Nfrfin Aderl J .r ietee, In,' ,'e re *rtm aMA Aa1tR! MMI71df !n l4n l:n Cntln lY, \,,~4 ltA / h VICINI iy YAP 4nA Pubite ttat li shho•eeh#r Mnlhe pvvl It ties tort .:r the 6lrNt tIfAH•el. $4 9.64' O I _ r- ltA7T Or 72RA! '14"W ! ar . 0 er nareM \ \ agURt fMlt, thn MA00itWRM40 Metrr7 Nit'(, In tm' for wo Ceunl \ A• ..aq..... ' Lit/.1 - N toil Of Pot onnt ►h6Yptlftli J \ r ♦ed a1rH en hneNt~ oet n/►t ie Wutr•C rihrd to I At L, r ,hnnen to we note end 6e, ..-.!NLl1? tt to me , IN't one tee hntte the 0/00 for the ~ ~r~ 6e one tAereln aOrHeeA colt in the n0pstitr.thereln wkltt,f cane{der6t ten A \ ; . pp 01YL01 tRln" Or NAND Aeon ft4L or ohtca TWIN---RAY UP-1#04. R SURVEY 5 kU17Q \ ~ p PRELIMINARY ~ _ _ ' ►'lAT • " , 1. Irl•, y l ' •n lHq p ,I~.n . yA .CI uN I JVaYTiMI'a TRI STEEL 1, 4ull ',I , ! , ' 1, Pr ; NtI.R. HEAD lr rt I t Vol, a.~U,.rN QCJARTERS el tie NYM Nr off t►et /'h A - _.I this 0161 Vol f treat 20 tew6t tae ADDITION U•S• HWY BIR r es well, this pl• arch 4k •Fod *4 f~l 0101 thel 6014 v 0stood 0 efloe0 Aire•a store teved or Itmat" Wri %0 00 soiucetli ore ifAiO L07 1 , f~I.U+CK 1 U_S/TY DRIVE WEST) AS 4 ar( OttY 0-1 "Moolr stool t?ENTo coUKTYf TEX rt'w. ~i.~,'~, "1~,..-,~;' . .Ile. o.te +Atu~ry hm 4WArr~ ORati• A11akt >b IrM ►Ml i PA e a ► ,ltr Au, Jz ~ lA ae•ep r" I. Ito city 04049il low" a 40y 94o 1*44 --A0 The Csgaail eonwae4 into the 000 6464i oil at ftio'P.O. is the civil Defense ROOM, PAARSKMTI "aYof stewatt= Mayer Pro Tom, Chow Council Members Altords Hopkins, MCAdams and Riddlesperger City ilanagero Acting City Attorney and city secretary MIGIRRAS AisRMTI Council Member Stephens 1. The Council received a report on the Arthur Andersen management letter, John Moaranes Director of finances reported on the implementation of various recommendations made by the City's auditors, Arthur Watson. Regarding collection efforts, in May, 1914 the city had contracted with an attorney for the collection of post due pro arty taxes, Aloo, the Accounting Division was in the process of rev sing the ttestrent of reoordiag revsaus at the time the tax levy was made, Full implementation of this reco xondation would occur with the 1904-45 fiscal year, loconoiliation between tax records and the general ledger was *courting on a regular basis, Recording of the tax levy was being donei hovsver, staff was ozoeriadciag some delay in receiving the information from the Tax Appraisal District office, Mayor Stewart stated that could result in a large loss if it was not kept current. Moorane reported that the recommendations for the utility customer accounts reosivable and work order budget versus actual comparison had been implemented, Regardibg the recommendation for a utility fixed asset systems the staff was is the prooesc of tsviewing whether to perform the inventory and evaluation of asset.' in-house or to contract the service from an outside fitm. A fixed asset system would be impI*msnted in the near future. Bank reconciliations were being performed on a monthly basis and all old Items would be voided as part of the year-end closing procedures. The recommendation that Cash disburssmeats be performed in a timely manner would be implemented at a part of the current closing procedures. j Regarding overPLl management controls, the `cosAunication among departments was improving and a policies and procedures manual vas in the review process, included in the manual would be a conflict of interest policy, Also, the Director of ?inane* position had been filled. In reopen$* to the recommendations for electronic data processing Controls and related matters, report writers were being used where feasible and the city was currently conducting a review with I.B.M. to determine the overall need for tetminals and personal computers. The recommendations fop system planning and checking of input had been implemented. Regarding utility ratters, PURPA reporting was no longer applicable. The recommendations `regarding the reconciliation of purchases and sales had been implemented. Counoil Member Hopkins asked what this reconciliation meant, i McGrant responded that an example was the reconciliation of the sale j of water to the amount which was created, In response to recommendations regarding internal Controls, security screens had been ordered to divide the City Council Chambers and Civil Defense Room area from the rest of the building. Another internal control recommendation re4ar4ing forms vat being addressed, Staff had been asked to review 411 'Current forms used and to make recommendations, This process would be completed by year-end. nitr goaagil Miqutes Nolo tog of July 24, 1014 Pale' Tile Re atdiaq uaooileotible aooovots, the 0 ty was lasikiap a 00f10Wtted short at oollectioa betore dOterM~aia# the aeobupt to be "uapoll.otibl.M, These 406OUnt{ were cot automatically written Ott, The recommendation on mileage requitootaie bad been implemented. The city currently paid 360 pet mile lot travel, The tederal allocation wee 20,60. The additional oompensattoo would be taxab.s. The Accounting' DiVision was aware Of which eXpense adVaaoee V3Le outstanding and had assigned an accountant to Contact individuals for documentation and reoonotliation. Also the suditor16 recommendations tot the bidding process had been implemented. Regarding the Municipal Court Computer s stem, a Mods analysis had been completed and a recommendation would be made to the Council in the near future. City Manager Chris Hartung stated that staff had reviewed the computer system used in the City of Bryan municipal court A,v! would look at the system in R1 Peso in August when, it o,4s fully implemented and operational. Hartung then recognised Jay Anderson, Assistant to the Finance Director, for his fine efforts and contributions during the time the city was without a Director of Finance. Wotane_reportad that draft motat pool, poli,otos were being Written and reviou", An aeooumting procedilr4 would be implemented to assure that the Varinus 41Vitiorto Within the city knew the salvage value of equipment and would transfer credits when equipment Moved from one division to another. Regarding the status of the prick year reoomMendat~l0aa,- Arthur Andersen had recommended that a formal disaster COOOVery plan be implemented for the data processing function. Moaraae reported that the Data Processing Division did haw A disaster plan, but it was not documented. 2. The Council held a discussion on financial reporting. John MoUrane, Director of Finance, requested commeQts'from thA Council on the type of reporting reduicements needed, 'Feedback was requested on the frequency of reports, the comprehsnslveness of reports, the type of information and presentation for the information, and the amount of detail. Council Member Hopkins stated that he would want to know where there were problems and, it a problem did exist, a narrative oxplauation. McOrane stated that the Finance Department would furnish monthly reports in chart form with a narrative memorandum. A report on long range issues would be forwarded aVerv six months. This reporting would begin with the new fiscal year. 3. The Council held a discussion on budget work sessions. John MCtirane, Director of Finance, asked when the Council would like to begin the budget work sessions. Council Member Hopkins suggested that the all day sessions did enable the Council to get into she budget. August 21 was set as the date for the first budget work session. e, The Council held a discussion on policies and procedures for the City arganixation. Kathryn Uarey, Director of Personnel, reported that the first nine petit es were completed, This proieot had been on-going for `nineteen , , FIR ' Qtkr Cega it 1lipueoa ' noo #al o July a{, 1144 Palo throe 0*4,ho imvolvipo several task Moss apA `h $tooting 904 , ties, ~ Baop 'ii pppp1t9yy heA been dratted by a t#ok force and tho ip itt" to the Ote*rinp committee, After review by the etootlal o#Alttes the policy was toviewed by the exooutlve e'tift, Draft copies of the ppoI M$$ were then 4Aa4e available tot employee input to the Steering Committee, The Steering Committee reviewed the input and incorporated the teaeible changes. The policies then were sent back through the executive staff Arid on to the legal department tot review prior to coxing to the Council. Uscey then love a brief desorigtioa or the nine policies being presented. There were no additions to the holiday policy, The policy on medical examinations spelled out when An examination would be required. The overtims compensation policy established exempt and non-exempt positions. The pol'loY on vacation bonus time did not set a limit on accruals. The feeaining policies on jury duty, death in the family, absenteeise/tardiness, in-house advanosment and compensatory time were mostly more documentation of sstablish.d rules, Council Member Hopkins stated that he was surprised at the portion of the absenteeism/tardiness policy which stated that an ompl-~,yee who did riot return from lsave on the pressr~ibed day would be terminsted. Hopkins then asked what other polio as were still being prepared. Usrey responded that approximately 4o. or 70 gore policies were in preparation, Most war* near completion and should be brought to council very quickly, The Council them convened into the Executive session to discuss legal patters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments, No official action was taken. The Council then convened into the Special Called meeting at 4;00 p,m, in the Council' Chambers. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor stoWartl Mayor Pro Tom Chewl Council Members Alford, Hopkins, M,)Adams, Riddlesporger and Stephens City manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ABSEWV1 None 1, The Council held a public hearing on the petition of R. J. button for annexation of approximately 11 sores of land located along the north side of 1-359 at Mayhtll Road, &A The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr, R, J. Button, the petitioner, spoku in favor of the annexation and stated that he was available to answer any questions which the Council might have. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hoarlcg, Sharron Jarmon, DevelOpm#nt Review Planner, reported that this property was on 1-35 southeast of Kayhill Road, The proposed land use -was for commercial 'light-industrial,, The Planning and Zoning commission had recommended approval, Institution of annexation proceedings would take place at noon on August 13, Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the annexation, motion carried unanimously, oily 4tiaadil Nilww~ Mott at dilly Rd, 1964 page Pe1tr 34 oretaano~a A, The Council considerod adoption of as atrendasat to the Cods of Otdin440e4 regarding the establishment of fees, Jeff "$yet,_Director of PIAA4i49 and Comsl~'Aity DsvelotmentI reported that the Planning and Zoning Co"iss on had re000000e4 this 4010041460t which would be a step towards the recovery of cost of service. Theta fiquree VOU14 not 'fully recovery actual coats but was the second year of a five year plan, The following ordinance was ptesentedt NO. 04-9S AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDI% A AND B OP THE CODE OF ORDINANCI{S OF THE CITY OF OEMTON, TEIIAS, TO PROVIDE FOR FEES FOll ANOUVSTS FOR..t,~. -O__N APPROVAL OP, SPECIFIC use PEvxlI s, x ilM ANl0ZITS, HISTORICAL LANCMARK DESir^ OHS. PLATS, REPLATS, GENERAL DEVELOPNMNT PLANS AND DEV'JLO NT REGULATION -VARU11lCES, BY. REFERENCE TO IEEE SCROULI ORDINANCES AS 'APPROVED AND AWMDPOOR TIME TO TIME BY THE ;CITY. COUNC141 REPEALING ALL ORWHAMC KS IN CONFLICT 41291INITH, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DA'Z'E. McAdams motion, R'Adlespergtr second to adopt the ordinanct. On roll 0411 vote ■ayts4 Hopkins "ays," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," siddlssperger 44yo,M ouw'Mayo," and Mayor Stewart Nay*." Notion carried uaaoimeutly. B, The Council oonsidered adoption of an ordinance setting fees. Jeff Meysr, Director of Planning, and Community Developreht, reported that this amendment would expedite the revision of fees in the future. The following ordinance ryas presentodt NO. se-93 AN ORDINANCE OF TIM CIVY OP DENTON ESTABLISHING OR REVISING FILING FEES PROVIDED FOR BY APPENDIX At THE DENTON DEVELOPlOINT CODE, AND APPENDIX B-ZONING, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS) REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HERWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "Aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanim'ausly, C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance instituting annexation proceedings on Approximatoly 31,335 acres of land located on the east side of FM4164 (North Locust Street) and vest of the Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park, &-A Sharron Jarsoo, Dsveloprent Review Plgnnet, presented an overhead projection map of the area and ropottad that this was a voluntary annexation. The owners wore requesting annexation and would then request specific use zoning for a mobile home park. The final action of this annexation was scheduled for September a. The following ordinance was presented. cislr opROii Niave.4i Na~ti e! July 144 104 Pao tw INf. •4- AN ORDINANCR ANNRXC+NI 'A. YRA Ot t,ANO CQN'1'19ONS AND ANACRNT To TNR CITY or OM4!'kI* Two; MIND AGO THAT GOT, TUCT OR pARCRG Oh GANG CCNSWIP O APPROCIIK%"t# 31.316 ACRRS OP GNO 1AY1N4 him "too 'SITVA"D XN "a COVNTY or O M'M , STATS OV TRYAI AMD NAM PART OP TO V. R. OAI49R SURVRY, AlSTRACT N0, 4S! DRuo CQUWTY# T11901 CtAsslryt O 'SAM 48 I'yRCrd1VS TtZ "A" Ots"ICT PROMRRTY; AND CGA AN R Hopkins mottos, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. Ca roll 0411 vote, "Adams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "sys," kiddlespsrger "ayy R," Chew "aye," cad Mayor Stewart "aye," Notion carried unanimously, D. The Couaoil oonsidot*4 adoption of an ordinance removing gasking in the North Texas State University area to provide for bioyole paths. Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that this issue had beta er bloyo discussed pa previously. , therute. war on 1"Wh Viand Hickory street sieAfttht further review, Welch Street was considered to be too narrow and North Totes raquestsd to 9e1AOV6 Welch and, to reroute the bike path down AVenua A and Hickory Street, The merobaats On,AVsans A Were not is favor of the plan and North ~s as, Ws pew : aski" tbat' the portion of the routs 9a Avenue A be e1 natsd. Staff bad diecuaSd affeectchief Welch Street The proposed State ordi nce wonl6 Wide andsconwith curr d~ Worth or Avenue A. Council Member Hopkins asked to hear from Chief Martin, Dan Martin, North TeXas State University POlioe Chief, distributed copies of a.map Showing the propossd route of the bicycle path. Martin reported that the justification for the Path had been previously discussed with the City Council, The uaiVersitY did not want to penalise the merchants and felt that the removal of the administrator@ Ldid note Want b to a040rif aseth do is*. inti system ~ifor one problem area, The merchants on Hickory Street bad" been Contacted again regarding the new route. Coucil Member Hopkins asked how the bicycle path would be marked, Martin respond d there would be striped lines on the outside of the path and a double-striped line on the insiue With reflector buttons, The mayor recognized those in the auaienca who wisheA to speak to this issue. Joe Northern, owner of Joe's Cleaners on Avenue A, presented a petition from merchants on Avenue A, Hickory Street and Watch Street in opposition to the removal of parking. Mrs Northern stated that they were not opposed to the idea of the path, but did not want to give up the parking spaces, Mr. Northern further stated that he had solicited signatures from property owast$ as well as merchants. 'Of the 45 business operators, all had signed with the exception of the bicycle shop and those persons who could not be contacted. He had also contacted as many property owners as he could and done were in favor of giving up the parking. Council Member Stephens asked Mr. Northern if he was opposed to the compromise offered by the university. Mr. Northern responded that the compromise had been offered after he had begun his petition. The compromise route would take one-fourth of the puking. r q~Rrr CoaMOll >xlmmgte. NIIMOia of July i/. 1004 NtNga 4004011 No"69 R14d1gIMNxroR odkN 4" Maay 00kiaq 4"00$ would be lost OA AV64104 A and "Rickety #tt"%o Mr, Nottbeca respPadod toot* we414 be l or s spaces on Avenue A and approximately le spaoes on Miakory. Council Member A19044 stated that the only argumsat seemed to be the parking spacer oa Hickory, council member kiddlespergat asked Chief I/artin how many parking spaces would be removed on Hickory. Martin responded 14. Council Member >eiddlespecger naked it the university administration bad given thought to using the sidewalks tot bicycles. Martin replied that the ualvernity was trying to eliminate the use of sidewalks on oamprA by cyclists as it was a dangerous practice. Martin further stater that most of the metered parking spaces on Hickory Street were used by students going to class and not by customers. Council Nember kiddlesperger asked about night and weekends. Martin responded that North Texas. had dnpaaded the weekend and night courses such that the bicyoli path would still be useful at those times. Council Member McAdams asked it the parking meters were for a maximum of two hours. Martin replied yes. Council Member HOA4404 then stated that the time on the Maters could be reduced and would thus discourage students from parking in the spaces. Martin responded that the university was trying to kutp students from using these metered spaces. Council Member Alford stated that the area from Avenue' B to A on Hickory Street would still have mstered:parking on the north side; only the spaces on the south aide would be forfeited' for the bike path. The parking from Avenue A' to'Welch Street on Hickory would not be affected. Curtis LOVeless stated that the Meters were now set for different lengths of time, which was helpful. The merchants had given input to the length of° time on the aetsrs, However, he felt the merchants needed every parking space now available on Hickory. Council Member McAdams stated that the Council also recognized that there was a mood for a safe place for bicycles, There must be a way to reach a compromise. Mr. Lbveleas stated that the feeling of the merchants was that the paths should be located on campus. Mayor Stewart asked Mr. LOVelesa it the marchants found that they received more business from oitisens or students, Mr. Loveless responded that parking was a problem now and citizens customers found parking elsewhere and Malked to the shops. Mayor Stewart stated that the "students appeared to be the primary customers of the Merchants in this area. o#t C~aMio## ,N#It>wtNi l~Il~ Fees 401,14 1►tsd 1~i A, ' V 1~e-ltMld « Of AOM0144O " kttd#to at Wshk ""s ttaQ iWtA ty, ReA>fe114R1 tI tililtl~ hA4 aAt ►eea a psebles: nett , PIC k#1►a s es. Moot , e taA M~r,k:#rw ol•vAV oq the south o de of x1103 hoest Redd' use by Stu#:Ilt1. The t"ueat tot the b 0r#1A path was" the result at a ooM4Aekn tot the satety of sta sp to. These "to oust#atly 1000 pi0yoles resiotered oil campus and e AU"es weuid increase. The university had tried to coach a compromise with the merohants on Avenue a and could not. CouaoiI Member Rid4losp#9449 asked Or. Pole it he felt the university had already compromised. Pole responded greatly. comaoil Member Stephens asked De, We bow the university was planning to get the bicycles oft tae campus sidewalks and onto the paths. P,>le responded the university administration would have a program of orientation, education and then tatotcement. Mt, Marvin Loveless appeared before the Council and stated that this pattieular area was totally dependent upon the available parking tot business. Although many custoWts were MT students, not all Ruts, All parties in this were intereAted in a healthy buKibeas atmosphere. Mt. Loveless further, stated that it the parking were eliminated, he would tell his property immediately. Counoii Member NOMA*$ 'tsiteseted that she believed that these spaces 4044'ent to the campus wets used by students. The following ordinance was presented: M0, 84-94 AN ORDINANCE PROHIUITINO TO PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE EAST SIDE OF AVENUE C PROM HIQHLAW TO MULRRRRY,, THE NORTH AND SOUTH $%DNS OF WLSKUY FROM AVENUE C tAVEMUt 41 BOTH SIDES OF AVRMIJX 3 ' OWN MULBERRY TO I CKORY: THE SOUTH g I DeH OF HtW(ORY FROM AVOM 8 To AVENUE A) THE WEST SIDE OF AVENUE A FROM HICKORY TO NULEERRYI THE NORTH SIDE OF MULSERAY FROM AVENUE A TO 9 UNI THE SOUTH StDt OF PRAtals FROM MULCH TO AVENUE A: THE MOUTH BIDE OF CHESTNUT' PROM MULCH TO AVENUE Al AND THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND FROM MULCH TO AVENUE C PROVIDING A SEVERAgILtTY CLAUSE,, PROVIDING A PENALTY 40T TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams Motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance. On roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye." Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperget "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 3. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution closing the 3200 block of Broken Arrow at both ends between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 906 p.m, on July 28, 1904 for a neighborhood block party. This item had been discussed at the July 17 meeting. The following resolution WAS presented: pIiIaI,UI19K WHEREAS, Margar,Mt Brown has requested that the 3200 Block of Kroken Arrow Lan*,4 E]iublio street within iba cerporate limits„ot the City of Denton, Texak~ be temporarily closed to public vehicular traffic between the hours of 5:00 p.m, to 9:00 p.m. on July 28, 1954, for the purpose of having a neighborhood block party; and 1,7 A T- 77 117 7- 7 1 Y 1. r1:.1 r. f 'T ' Cityr' ceaak►ii Miagtds 9` , NNt1 Ot Jgly t4. 1fMa NN ~44t s *Now, Nst"t~e , ~toMt► Mac 40oved the city Cwr+oil twat sit teoidapts to 0*0% bleak b+1vo a toed to the t•goxaty closiu4 of f toot pttios of Wokes. Attow L40e1 ~rd Nar4aetlt EKo" has further atsgtod the city Council that 40 aiooboliv beverages will be sotvod at the above-osattoned ' block wttyi NOM TMRRaroltE, iE I'1' REWLM By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THR CITY OF DENTON TRXASI SECTICM 1, That broken Artow, Lane, a public street in the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas, be temporarily closed to vehicular traffic in the 3200 block of said street from the bouts of 5100 P.m. to 9100 p,R, on July 78, 1416, tot the purpose of having a hoighorhood'block patty. 39=100 IL That the City Manogsr shall direct the appropriate City Department to erect barricades at both ends of the 3200 block at Broken Arrow Lana at 5:00 p.m. on July 28, 1946. and to have the . same removed at 9100 p.a. on said data. PASSED AM APPROVED this 24th day Of July, 1946. it I NAYOR r CITY OF DULON, TEXAS S ATTRI{t: CHARLOTTE ALLEN. CITY SRClICTARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAr 'r APPROVED AS TO LEGAL MORMI JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEIPTON, TEXAS 9y'. Chow Notion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved. On y roll Call vote, MoAdara Hay*," Hopkins ',&ye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddles peYq•r "ayye," Chow Hays." and Mayor Stewart "aya." „ Motion carried unAnirouslY• i ~ 6, The Council considered Approval of the preliminary plat of the Morse street Addition. Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported thee the Council had requested opinions on the plat from the City Attorney and the City Engineer. Council Member Stephens asked it the 30 day autoratiC approval apply to all plats. Acting City Attorney Joe Morris responded yes. that was a state statute. Hopkins notion, Alford second to approve the preliminary plat of the Morse Street Addition. Motion carried 6 to 1 with Mayor Peo Ter Chow casting the nay vote. r.; ale a~riaNii~ Ni~Ls1 pM~~k~~t dolt ' 1~ 39N 11. aeM4441ty approval of teimbursemaat to the YlemLOa Ce~lntr xlstitteal Cosy set** for the Cost of the kook add laNer truck 0014 l4," This 1%" Mau #14004 on the aooods as a result of discussions hold at the duly ,17 covaoil meeting, MoAd motion. Chew $00*04 to . pu9064e the truck, With the 0004 'q~44, that the Denton Coun y' kistotioal Commission be reapobsibis tot the toll Care, waiptohanoe and storage of the truck and that if told, the City would be reimbursed the funds, ACt14q City ittorgar Jot Morris stated that there would be a problem with the legality of such a transaotion. Motion and second were vithdraws and no notion was taken. a. The COUmcil considered proposed pro rata and ovetsise agroem*nts with John Pass, tnveatsents, for a new sanitary sewrline from his property on Dallas Drive, along Danoan Street, along the oreekbed to the Pecan Creek Moodrow LOU* twin 0utfall interceptors. sob Malsoa, Director of utilities, topotte4 that Mt. Pass bad offered to participate in the sewatllna. The 'City would be obligated to approximately 614.000 tot the oversisi0q and right-of- way. Hopkins motion. chow $00404 to approve the pro rata and ovetsise agto"Mate. Motion carried unanimously. 7. The:Covmcil ooasidsrea approval of an agreement for water pro 'tata participation for Hickory Creek Limited and the City of Denton to serve a sl acre mobile home park on South Teasley Lane. Bob '"Olson, Director of utilities, r6potte4 that this was the totmalisation of a previous agreement. Couho'}1 Member Hopkins stated that this development was outside the city limits and asked if the d welopor would pay more. Nelson responded no: the propk4tty was located on a state highway. Hopkins notion, Chew second to approve the agreement for water pro rata participation. Motion carried unanimously, 8. The Council oonsidei*d setting a date for a utility revenue bond election, City Manager Chris Hartung repotted that this issue had been discussed in a joint meeting with the Public Militias Board. The bond funds would be used for vitally needed utility proj*ots. Due to the requiremsnts for legal notices and since this was peak vacation tine, the staff was recommending that the election be hold on September 15. Council Member St*phons asked if a committee would be needed to help show the importance of the bonds, Hartung responded that the Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission had data available to substantiate the need for the additional funds, Council Member aiddlesperget stated that an election was not regUir*d by state law. McAdams notion, Chew second to set the date for a utility revenue bond election for September 15. Motion carried unanimously. 90 The '•Council considered authorising the City Manager to exaoute au 49teament to provide assistance to the City Council in matters relating to Flow Memorial Hospital. I ~ 7 pit cet"A Milwtss 00 We of July 24 1944 ` Cityy Rijulswr Chrla 1~ rtluw LoprtN that $tat$ well 040t+tof"N addltio"l tit" regardiaf this Matters proposals 404 "so rsesivN from the loss* Otoups Arthur wetsoa cad Medical Cemsultant Associates' Coanoil MsMoe pkias stated that he was not 00a tbet a survey was what he ves look hq tor, P10w Hospital was fi0w under now mamagemeat and ooald ooos 33y taraiah the` ihfors►stioa necessary. He was interested is kasvimg about'tbe eosaemio viability,et the hospital. Council Nember Riddlesperger stated that moat County had a 70 tax to support their hospital and the tax in Dallas and Tarrant Counties, was even hWber. Council %**bet INAdome stated she felt did not 'feel a survey of Flow Hospital users would answer her questions. she as mono interested in the stand of the county Comatiissioners. espiaially an the issue of indigent care, Perhaps further conversations with the Flow "Capital soatd of Directors, the bounty Commissioners and the City Council would be more helpful. Council Igmber Hopkins stated that the Problem was fuadiaga If %be count 'Commissioners would not support the hospitala which Aiteotioa saoull the City CeuAail take. There wee several options, each as a - hospital district or to sell the hospital. ConAOil NoMbot "ams ;asked it a Consultant Could `offer sons insight on the Various options which would be open. Hartunq responded that he bad tried to steer the consultants in tbac direotiea. It was difficult to evaluate options under the aloud of the unknown regarding the payment for indigent oars. Council'Nerbor Rid4letperger stated that be felt the Council should talk to the various groups. Council Member i1CAdams stated that she felt it appropriate to approach the Board of~ Directors and communicate the enthusiastic support of the Council for Flow. The Council should Consider meeting with the Board first and the consultants second. Hartung stated that he would be glad to arrange a meeting. 10. There was no official action on Executive Session items of legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. 11. The following items of new business were suggested. 1. Council Member Stephens stated that the issue of joint funding for the Public Health Board and the Library needed to be discussed with the County Commissioners and suggested an update in the City Manager's status Report. The Council reoooveaed into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No official action was taken. With no further items of business, the meeting was.adyourned. RICHARD 0. STENART, MAYOR CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY 152SC „s City CeaiklI M> cut" ~1 Jgly $to The A i xlsg ca~if m Atk6 $0 o1-01- Id he CiviliDO A O to NiN a&P CCU WXb venom "mom i err1~or 1<COwnrtki mayor Pro Tom Cpowl Couadl Mam~rs 1►ltOrd Hopkins, MoA4ams, Riddiesperger cad ltepbene City manager. Acting city attorney and city secretary COU00L Na W"S ustWT1 None PAZ vXM8 XS P4262 Ti Andy sidor and Tom Pearson 1, The Council ooas14stsd apprOVal of an upgrade to the Mang word processing system. The upgrade would include a CPU update, sottware, and all peripherals needed to extend the system. ANA Ningmaa, program Administrator, reported that this upgrade to the Naaf 11y tog had been reviewed by the Data Processing Advisory tl-JA rd at Me council,$ request. The board was agreeable and bad recommended approval. They had also recommended that the Director of Veto rr64l4eia9 work closely with the Word Processing Center and to bttAf future upgrade items betore the board. Mayor gtewAtt asked at what point would the need for upgrading to the system stabilise. sing as a*:rnded that that would be contikent upon the growth of the cftr cad the.deew nde node oa the word Otodsisiag Center, it was believed that this Upgrade, won24 et0ilise tA. system for a ar l years. The center was fairly stable with $ome work overage being handled by personal computers in various departments. Council Member Hopkias..atated that he had wanted the Data Processing Advisory Board to review this item to unsure that the equipment would remain compatible. He felt the board should be involved in areas other than yust the Pinanoe Department. Hopkins motion, Alford alloond to approve the upgrade to the Mang word processing system. Motion carried unanimously. 2. The Council oonaldered approval of a resolution to express the City's opposition to the mandatory minimum Sail standards for munioipalities contained in House Concurrent Resolution 217, City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the Texas municipal League had been following legislation on mandatory jail standards and was asking cities to ass resolutions to be forwarded to the legislature. 'iML felt that the adoption of mandatory standards would out a financial burden on cities by requiring modifications to existing }ail facilities to bring them into compliance, Council Member kiddlesperger asked it the proposed legislation would set up standards which would asks the City of Denton fail out of daSC, Hartung responded that this legislation was in process. Council Member Moxaame stated that she was fearful of having no standards and the resolution sounded very negative. It was her belief that there should be some type of standards. I r_711 at COW il1441ites lbstihp at July 11. 1!414 ram tMe tk li *)044t Ri4Alwieget !tetod thAt he vonld see why the Texas a ij; oival aa4q%# W91814, tails tkio stood. CoW44t1 VA"01 Nopkias stated: that he was iu favor of being 0"Ottiw of in 644 talk that ther would not asked tot assistance if they had sot roeearohed %he 1"islati0a0 RioM`rd Madden appeete4 before the council and stated that he had a4a la u. aa6 8114 R~ V40 Carlene ptoittObilo intoxication, he yas re4uired to spend a boors ;in the 04ru04 teak", There was no light. Re window, no toilet tacilitiss and no runniag water. Nine other persons were in the sash *oil. Gladden further stated that Animal pounds have aiaikaR standards Sad telt there should be some for Sail facilities. Gladden susrarised by stating that he saw that no alternative reco.meadationS had been made and questioned how the Council Could object to minimum standards. Couaoil Nember Hopkins stated that he would like to see what were the mandatory Standards. He was not opposed to Minimum standards but did object to oppressive requirements which would be cost prohibitive to meet. Council Ne.pet R14610sper~,~ger Stated that he did not want the city to be required to build a 0%bliday team for prisoners. 04ttugq repotted (1.h4t duriry the construction process, Me, Gladden bad 414ep16 OPOftunit* to see the city lianager or say Couaoil Member with' bees a'.ggastions' t she, new jail, The resolution bstore the Council opposed matd#*. titaadards. f mayor Stewart Stated,, that when the new jail was completed, he had asked why that* Mete' no toilet facilities in the "drunk Lank" and had been told that tbi) prisoners would destroy them. Gladden reponded thet this was more likely to occur in the holding cells and these cells had toilets, Riddles Ocoee motion, Hopkins second to table approval of the resolution. Notion Carried unanimously. 3. The Council considered the 1981 Denton Development Guide update. Steve Panning, Planning and Community Development staff, r♦ported that the primary goal of the update was to give an interpretation of the issues and needed clarification, The Guide Was used by staff and had an influence on development in the city and also had an impact on potential developers. There were 17 issues to be revicwsd, Council Mestec Hopkins asked it the city-wide intensity studies in the back of the update material were new or were they included in the original Denton Development Guide, tanning replied that they were new. The staff had many questions which; influenced the intensity studies, These wore now codifi d into working document corr. Council, Member Hopkins stated that the Guide was now very intensity oeiedl;rd and asked it the 'calculations used to arrive at the intensity were standard or otested by the staff. tanning responded the prooedure used to derive acceptable intensity was ,t mixed bag. Some of the factors, such as car trips generated in retail arose, were substantiated by actual studies, council Member Hopkins stated that the intent was to set policies but he was very concerned about a potential loss of flexibility for developerd it state was to be looked into a soacifIt set of numbers on intensity, FfjH city 1 iatilto* 1Mooslpl~..Jt sly 110 11164 yNs; s4i;oo Ttw6> t M►arsalls 014.i", 404 ult~ad 'Gea1NiA4#oa IM~Nc~ ~t t~ that a 00 40' "eawlo0644 too 414;4 011 vd6 took t i g~ iolN M~~igo 1 %T 14 P100 404404144 that the C600*1 Was thiakisla in togme at 44 ov#040II, o! the ohtU4 city land. the a3 4 404 ctiwula vl iti othetattaittrro oe a p+iool. this V410e4 a red tlag to the state that that* Ca ld be potential problems, otiletiA Vote Intended to bnused only as a gut r' stated that CAo4o ?mooing to orted that the use of the latepsity 0#U1%iag ooaoipt would enable staff to elect the Council when intensity bad been exoeodod in any ono particular area. it the Council approved soninq in an urea Whore intensity had boon exceeded, staff would work to aohtsve the best developsent possible, sidbr stated that the goal ws to have controlled' growth and the balance between high and low dovelopmeat. The Council than began an issue 'by issue review of the proposed update to the Outdo. Issas 01 - Now ianertant are t ho Intsn,41v Policies? 1►ap414 v reported that intensity should M A pti0xityissue but, aot the Onfy o»•. The t*0oi so4&tioq'.M,4s that' ' o oh} in,of ♦q atoa's intensity iadx stas4ard Was ooAsiaered a}or aiiwl'n qftae city and thoretoro inoreiaontal "planning activitiao 644, decisions that would change the gattent or pioisotod intensity ot, area should be tabled, time posmitting, so a opeeial intensity study of that area could be totested to the PO;, Inorslieptal plapkrng aotiiitiss &",/or decisions ina ude but wsre'not It Ito to, ;oatnot utilities, drainaggst tramsporcatton, park'piannindo 'etc, These could dtteotiy or indirectly change an area's ultimate land use intensity. The poz would focus on the intensity qusation and sake their recommendation to the council, ttsuo #2 - Intensity standards. Do thsv 3etlect our Obtectives? Planning reported that the P42 wanted to examine and discuss this issue further before Baking any recommendations to the Council. Issue 03 Syrreat, afforts to Imolement the intensity &taedarQ 1ldenuate? tanning reported that the problem was the system ourrently used and perhaps a review should be rude of the toning process, The Pax had asked staff to bring back to them a r'scammended program which would combine the current efforts and concentrate on the infrastructure. 8idor stated that it had also beenrecommended that all aayor :one oases petition for the planned development classification with a 3 year time limit for silbstantial (15U deVelopment, It this was got accomplished, the toning would be rescindod, Council should consider it the 15t re defined to financial development or actual construction. Issue N4 - type of Proi lie Under the Guido sent Policies 1 Fanning reported that the staff recommendation was that a development of 12 units or above on I ante be Considered as an apartment. Issue 05 - hocess eouired for Hich Density Housinc Panning reported that the recosnandatiol, was that in low intensity areas, high density housing would roglite the only access by a dpi Omit %$autos ' 110e~tN', of July 11, lgia Rage Oar a 1~ asy arterial or gteata . 1101 a medorate tht*"ity area, hi" deadlty houoi»q Would requsto ' !440604 by a %&Jet or sOOOMary arterial With so $00660 by 10W 461+itl reeideatial $tteeta, tesue M6 - " VsWaq tepotto that the inteai # ",to have Mite {►l44 aonttol, to the pasty Wp440d 4,0Vele"140, roman 444'; ►o64 used t control land .0600,'Tho Tki reoo"004tion wen to iaoorborate the following: it toe 0roposed develeP opt was to be within 10100 cost of so existing l 0 density restdential area, or a distance as judpsd to be materially affecting the character of 'the notphborhoods, the follOwiag policies would apply for **Moroi& I lapartment developmGAtt 1. it adjacent residential areas have landscaped front yards'r the o0amsroial/apartments would likewise have landscaped front yards 2. it adjacent to single story residential, the comsiercial/ apartment$ would be single story or have large setbacks for transition to the neighborhood i. signs would have to.. be is scale with the neighborhood, usually weaning attacbe4 to the too* ou the boildi" the parking lot 'deefiga Would 0604, to 110101 1 *octet away from ;;residences, ps,tking areas 6othaoko, per"haat screening from residences, and parking lot lights positioned away from residences. S. when practical, couvatible architeotural style would be encouraged. Issue 07A - [!lariricatiee et the PolicydaraotIIe Ai antar ent me 1, It, V. ty. oaoentrations in Lod, and ato NeighhQrhgQdd Eanninq reported that the PiZ recommendation was to change the guide policy to specific standards, such asi 1. concentrations in low intensity areas should be limited to 200 units 2. oonoentrations in moderato intensity areas should be lisited to 750 units 7. ooncantration$ must be separated from other high density housing by 1/2 mile or 501 of the intensity area length, whichever is lose. This included separation from adjacent intensity area high density housing, including moderate intensity areas, adjaoent to low intensity areas. Issue M79 - Clarification of the -Pal I " "I - Ara g9pttered 8 tad (concentrations of ne chborhood cemmereial. o L co *to.)?" Fanning reported that the purpose was to limit oftiW tStaii concoottaticns. The recommendation was that 40scitio eonceptritlon standards for neighborhood commercial - and office' be developed, specitically, an intensity conoentration limited to a typical 4 more neighborhood retail center. Specifically, the policy would state thatt 1. concentrations of oftio♦/retail, etc, in low intensity areas would be lixited'to 6 acres or 2,600 intensity units, whichever is greater r'-^r.-;~y,•T~3^-•-- 711 T", Crit~ :ot~l ii#lertoa 1feu' , .a ♦ ,Tnly sl, 3♦sd ►aqe eiw Z, a♦$o,♦ tkh # Mr ltpoti ooMitato ttoo 0"Of high isto*itty xetall• 41 lys~ ek o 14►lar' 1#M ao♦a 0# 1/! MtA# Or SO O . this too ,#Mtg it ago# loaoth, Whichevert to lease 140 to 6 $49tation tram ad jeoeat intensity c a h(vk lot* Aattrlr lame use areas, including Moderate intensity areas adiacsmt to low intensity areas, Toole Ms Riaiea jee Itns~,s Hams ;aria 0144141 repeated that K)i cecoNmsnded thW 100ation policies be the scree ae suggested for apettmemts, pot example, in low Int#as►ty aitoas t 1, the overall intensity standard not 06 violated 2. no concentration of more than 200 %hits 3, 490#46 by a Collector *traet or larger (if density was less than 12 units pat act*) e. Strict site plan'ooatccl within 1,600 teat of any existing Single family residential area 6, sufficient croon *Pao*, recreational facilities, eta. be provided a. input tCarl tbo asighsothood in planning to mod*rate intensity aro&$% 1. the overall intensity standard not be violated 2. limit concentration to 750 units 3, aooess to oollector street or larger (if density is loss than 12 units pat acs*) e. strict site plea OOAtr01 within 1,600 fast Of any existing single family residential area Issuf 09 - Ths prot cti_on.of Nxintina Housing paaning reported that the P62 recommendation to Council would be to continue the Current policy which was a very strict and narrow int#rprstation, of the criteria, IACludinc the planned development site plan requirements to include a design compatible in architectural scale and style, such as front yard, side yards, eto, Other r*quirem,>nts which would be followed in their most restrictive interprstatiofi would include only acosts by secondary arteriat or greater for multi-family/coamercial, required open space, input from neighborhood, and no violation of the overall neighborhood Intensity standard, Issue 010 Diversified Lane Use r.naouraaed in Low Intenaity Areas panning reported that the recommendation was that all current poliolea be strictly enforced and applied equally to all low fntanrity 'planning area. Limited amounts of spartmsnts, small housing, mobile homes, etc. would be aliowed in all neighborhoods, but t'ie policy would prohibit a concentration of any one type of housing in any one neighborhood; i1 strict enforoem#nt of the overall` Intensity and conoentration standards would be requited. tssue all - Commetaial/office Devaloament on Carroll aoulward panning reported that the recommendation was to reconfirm the current Denton D#Vetopmeat Guide policies, The current policy states that Carroll soul'evard is intended to be a major north/south throdgbwar and maintaining thcoughway' traffic flow is of high r it Woutes Nso i of July i1« 1004 lsxi,~` thora bin., sirts oom~aetotal senimg at, bartoll i• stcokplr ~100opf,,p4d. 114 ft"t, 84149004 nodes such as the immediate devotowm 4rea %wild N permitted. .Other o*otioss of Carroll -wild suppett du'p3349a 1404 smell scale multi-fsmily an4 ottice soaiwq under wry 3imited o0aditioast 1. "sito design t') prof dt adjacent siaglo family te$uttiag such things 44 sotoea Ag 9e4040, large setbacks, lad soaped front yards, sign control, eto." t.. "iite; 4esir to ipsure good Ott-street ottoulattoo and parking an Very limited curb cuts in order to otaimiso traffic disruption on Carroll" 30 "input from adjacent neighborhoods prior to a decision" issue 012 - Areas Fanning reported that the P&Z reoos"adation was. to Change the alignment , to Hickory Creak 20a4. it this realignoemt were accomplished, the city would not have to buy additional right-of-way book from Lakewood Eetatse. The two ourreat 10041410 intensity areas on Ryan Road should be moved to Teasley and Hickory Creek Need and to Port Worth Drive and Brush Creek Road. IMoloe stsvart stated that ho Colt this issue should be omitted at the prfoogt.tim4 due to a meeting which had, recently boon hold with the state Highway bepartmeat regarding the loop. lsove 013 - - way and runctional posiabAti0ft Street North Paasigg reported that sell Avenue was now serving as a secondary atial from University south to 1-35K, The 1964 DewlOpmeat Guide 0l,tet stnatad the loop around TMU due to Voter disapproval. Right of-vay conov.aints make an extension of 9e11 north of Mingo Road diffi6lat. Jotrv Clark, City Engineer, reported that staff had already made $01 oommitments, staff would recommend that Boll Avenue loop property being developed by Joe below and that traffic be added through the Texas Woman's University Campus, 9611 .,...o`be downgraded to a collector strosc. tanning reported that the Piz rscomsendation on this issue stated that the main concern was to set a definite right-of-way policy as decisions must be pads on platting, The elimination of Bell as a major arterial north of McKinney could have ijose negative city-wide land use impact due to the limited north/south major arterial options, Carroll Boulevardcould not carry the entire north/south load for a population of 200,000. The question of Carroll was oapecially- important in light of related policy decisions on land use, tapaoity on Carroll would decrease with added commercial or office zoninq and additional curb outs, The Engineering Department was recommending that Mingo/MdKinnsy south be designated as a secondairy arterial and Ball north of McKinney to Locust be Collector width (60 feet) with the uaderetanding that the City could make alternate routes a priority thoroughfare planning activities, Council Member Hopkins stated that he would be in favor of rerouting Boil. tf staff wad recommending the elimination of sell as a major arterial, he would 'like to see a specific alignment study for the looping of Bell from Mingo to Sharman. issue 014 - Hinoo Road Riaht-of-May fanning reported that Mingo Road did not carry enough. traffic to be olassifled as a 'major arterial and should ba dowagradad. Mingo tan tp ..t ,n q•;. ] a, fl~t~' I~r11iN11Miil~toa ~s~ awy ii, iPa the 'rai :ea4 ti4ht.ot-Mar Mhift a nee tlaaalr filil►t«oY.r ~ t Otltt to s►tols. poll %AS to4oakoil4faq that the 1841 Matoa or►a~i sat plea of dseigaatiM MiMp~0 as a 1140044ty 40stlal be reiaatatod 'Ana to 'haw Ro toot of chat-ot-Wap on Miago Whets it :aa Pataliol to the railroad. lssae 'bit "dawns Th"Al"I"Aut-Al ►ehalaq toporte4 that the Pox was re00aa~ddiAq the nw clasoiti- oatiea "expresswy" be added. Correa% classifications w=et tset#46yo which have controlled 4000$0 exrxeOWaYs which bays troatato -$0640, with some at grade o;osaiAga' major artsriala Which trawree the City 6e00044ty Arterial$ which sotve parts of city but do not traavorse Cityy Collectors which serve neighborhoods Issue 016 Chense iy i'y wins t"&%& Tim& from Aoril to OCtohat hanniAq reported that the recommendation Wad based on the hope that piasait ighxoninq CosiiiasionWil ed time on the City Council and Cra tfaat--tar Traatunt ltssuo 017 ~ Dayalsenaiat star the Paeap it64004;' stated thatthe ourtint -'psli0y suk 046ste4 that 9*6Adeatial P v,l4"Wat be 'dis00utagod A4)40eat the Piet W640wtow~o, 100g thkt amtbpt did not piovida `epoottios, ao additioaal:tosideatial 4evolopment be ronod Mithio 2#004.te!t of E1ke plant and that x0ideatial dovelop"4t geaarally, be disoottaVA between 2,600 604 4,000 feet, The Utility .POp4ttM0At reo0aneaded toot the area Within 20600 teat of the wastioitei Treatmomt Plant be utilixe4 tot industrial purposes, preferably industries that could utilize the eftluent from the plant as Cooling Water or other processes requiring lower quality water. This could enhance the future Water supply 'situation and saw money as the city would not have to purchase its Water or treat and pump it, 4„ , ?be Counoil Convened into the rxeCUtive Session to discuss 10441 ratters, real estate, personnel and board appointrents. No official notion was taken. 5. No items Of neW business were suggested for future agendas. With no further items of business, the meeting Was adyourned, RICHARD 4. 6T WT, MAYOR CHARLOTTE ALLRM, CITY SECRETARY 1526C CitAC* u otl Most" It 7♦ 064 !IN 0*W11 cos"MW into the work seisiom at 6130 p,mr'fa the Civil out as". Alot •te"st= *yac Mme Tao chew; council Members _ m Ord, Hopkins, as», Siddlespecget gad stephoas City Manages, Acting City Attorney $44 City secretary M1111peRs AYSN"I None The council received a report from Dr. James Glass on the results of the 1984 DeotoA survey of citizens. City hlopaper Chris Hartung introduced Dr. glass to present the results of the survey. Dr, glass reported that he had followed the sane termat as used in the post and would give tbs Council the iMportaat eumaary aepsots. The format' used ws$ a random sampling of adults selected ftom the telephone book. Ths same descriptors from previous surveys had bass used, 2600 of the desoriptors ware iafotmstive and some were not. The~,Couacil and staff could be encouraged by the, sample characteristics to that there was little differaaos from past ourwys. , Tbe.js' oct of tbs.'itosgits. was divided fato` obrea parts city adfvia4o, , qit adminintt0toq, and the a psaraaO* of Don~on, i►pproxf kaly S t of tbs~quostioas on the ; arvey dealt pith city servioes, Citist as.bad 144ioatsd in the survey that they felt thn streets wets serious problam sad a significant portion *t those surveyed favored a tax increase, for street improvements, council 06640c stephons asked if the citisoae'who were not in favor of a tax 'increase were asked why they opposed. MAW responded ho, but egrveyers did follow-up by asking how m4 of an increase the citirens would be willing to pay. Tbet'e was a definite improvement in the ratings in the library cato1ory as well as an increase in the favorable response to the recteatf.on programs and the packs. However, the increase in the library tategory was greater. Thera vim. also an increase in those who voiced that they had erperienoed a missed pick-up of solid waste. Under the emergency services category, there was a decrees* in the positive evaluation of polio* services. Perosptions of police officers showed a slight decline from the category of ."good" to "fair." The response to the crime prevention program was similar to that in 1063. There was an increase of 10% to those responding that they felt rater due to the program. The tire protection service inquiries received all "excellent» and "good" responses, All responses to questions on ambulance service fell within the expected range. A decline Use noted in the tteponses to animal control services from "excellent" and "good" to "fiir■ gad Opoor". The question was then asked of all services, which did the citizen feel needed the most 'improvement, tspravemeat to the streets received 92.2% of the responses with recreation and garbage collection next. When asked which services the citizen Mould delete if out-backs had to be wade, the rankings were tot recreation and parks, library, and garbage collection. Police and tits service wete ranked last. "MIT 1791 71, IT OFF- i 01c owwi it l ata~to} .c t c Is , 1644 pave y11e Casvasses04tog t$0 4ces whisk M0bN imnowtir4tso was loft arc of tiN 0360 reepoaded thet oitiosse did tot 9"1 this service was eWS♦attal. Mayor 1toMacC stated that parbaps it was due to the tact that poo le lather liked animsls or they did act and t."Cotore did act soe ttis as essential. Glass Nether repotted tbst u04er the station dsaiing with city adMinis at oa, 20% of those sux"Yo~a' had bad contact With the city. nr "a, most part, oittsom$ re satisfied and felt the person with whom they had dealt Moe helptul. Mayor Pro T*Xi Chew asked it the$* o0a4goting`tbs survey kept a ltst of Who they contacted so as not to oatl the save perace each year. class responded that he did not keep a list but due to the random saRpliap0 from the telephone book, thane Mou14 only be a remote ooesibtlity of contacting the saps "coca again. Mayor Pro Too Chew stated that the results were from only a sample of thk Citizens and might not depict the accurate views. Glad, replied that tho rosuita were a 4004 indicator of views. Council Me4bor dtsiheas stated that the results did oply reflect the view at the "gas" contacted. Glaso responded that be tsit aontideat that the tiqures wets good indicators whoa ooppated with reaponsss troll previous snrwys. City Miaatigee Hartung reported tbat the survey Was sot°,iateAdhd to be promise but rather to eatloot treads in attisea opinions over the Yeats. , CoaaistenCy 0 tbs SUCV*Y results over a eailee at years would show' these trends. The reagtting response to the 66e4ed Improvement to the streets was a good example of these expooted trends. Glass reported that the response to the question of how Welt the citizen felt Denton was run was fairly consistent with the last several year's results. Responses to questions regarding souing showed slight increases U the "good" category and also in the "bad" oategocy. Fifty percent of those surveyed were aware of tht city's efforts to attract industry to Denton. sixty two portent felt the growth in Denton was too rapid. Questions related to perceptions of living in Denton were the third category, Most people felt generally satisfied with their neighborhoods,, some did respond that they felt litter, Junked cars. eto. had increased. Whin asked tot input on ways to improve the appearanae of Deatan. the general respcase was to plant more tests and have larger green spaces. Most of those surveyed rated Denton as a good place to live which was consistent with the 1961 survey results. Glass concluded by stating that be felt the survey had value and felt that Confidence in the results Wculd'increase as more input was received in future years. Council Member Ai4dlosperger stated he felt the results were very helpful and complimented Dr. Glass on his work. Council Member McAdams stated that' responses from minorities and the poor, Were Consistently atgatiw abWAt the City mad asked bow this could be remedied. city CogaeYi l~tutssi , 1180 tag of AUN, i1t. 7, 1f64 Pago "too cou oil 11e"ot RiddiespeRser stated that it was s basic, tcueh that of Rent people usually were happier than poor people, Dr, glass 44444 that Denton was 4 faitly 4K'flue4t 000INUnity. council member McAdams stated that the results dealt with city services and she did not see a correlation between being poor and unhappy and having c problem with city services, Renters would soon, if they did not now, outnumber homsuwners and all would use the services, council Member Riddles argot stated that the attitude asonq minorities toward the polio* should be exAmined. CouSioil Member MoA44me stated that the responses to the questions rolitinq to the elt*otiW nesw of nonin0 Mould depend on what the person being surveyed felt was "effective", Sometimes this could mean know well 4000 it serve me." Council Member Stephens stated that, in light` of the decisions made to 'update the Denton Development quids, it might be appropriate to include Questions relating to city-wide land ace. Council Member Riddlesperger replied that few people in Denton realised that there was a development guide. Council Member Hopkins stated that futyr• sutyeys needed to address the issue of Aconomio development in an effort to solicit feedback. Mayor Stewart stated that the council Members associated with certain types of citizens in their social circle. The purpose of the survey was to gatbor input from a random sampling. The Council convened into the Executivo session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board adpointhents. No official action was taken. The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7;00 p.m. In tho Council Chambers. MEMBERS PRESENT; Mayor Stewartt Mayor Pro Tom Chow; council Nembers Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens City Manager. Acting City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ABSENT; None 11 The council considered approval of the Minutes of the Special Called Meeting of February 21, 19841 the Regular Meeting of !larch 13, 19841 the Regular Meeting of March 20, 1984; the Special Called Meeting of March 27, 1984; and the Special Called Mcetinq of April 3, 1984. Riddlesperger notion, Alford second to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Consent Agenda Staff requested items 2.A.2 and 2.B.5 be removed from the Consent Agenda. McAdams notion, Hopkins second to approve the Consent Agenda with the exceptions of items 2,A.2 and 2.9.5, Motion carried unanimously. a~.c CoWaatl Niauces MWITtap of August 70 1964 Pago Four Consent Agenda$ A. Bids and Purchase Or4ers1 1. Sid 0 9307 - Electric Distribution trans- formers 24 Bid M 9306 - Disposal of PCB capacitors (RCMOVED BY 6TAFr) 3. Bid 0 9309 - Bleotrio meters 4. Bid 0 4312 - Trubk cab/chassis Bid 0 9313 - Mater Meters 6. Purchase Order 0 44162 to eat-T-hark Supply CompanY, Inc, in the amount of *3,690.00 7. Purchase order 0 64197 to Group Graphics In the amount of $3,697.00 S. Purchase Order 0 64240 to J, S. BQuipment Company in the 'amount of $4.443.00 0. Plats, Rapists and site planes 1. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Bari'ster Addition. (''ie Planning *ad Zoning commission rsoomn6nds approval,) 2. Appt6val of the final replat of the Bellaire Heights Addition, Phase I~ (The Planning and zoning Commission recommends Approval.) 3. Approval of the final replat of the Haywood Jeatrr "Addition, (The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval.) i 4. Approval of the final replat of the Teasley Mall Subdivision. (The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Westgate Park Addition. ("he Planning and zoning commission recommend, approval.) (REMOVP,D BY STAPr) 6. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Mt. Calvary Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recomsends approval.) 7. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Southridgs it Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) S. Approval of the site plan of Township 11, Phase ii. (Ban Jacinto Shopping Center) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 9. Approval of the preliminary replat of Township It, Phase It. (San Jacinto Shopping Center) (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) C. rinal Payments: 1. Consider approval of final payment for 1983 drainage improvement projects (Bell- Coronado. Paisley-Mulkey, and Ponder street). ato V401 N404too "MAT et august 11 1064 rage Fve D, Codtraats and Ag6,4ee403 11 consider a provai of too Peintoganoe contract with TREE Payton FAtso»nel Bylltem, ('the Data Processing Advisory Eoard tecommeads approval,) 2. Consider 4ppmal of the maintenance contract of the AN$ binanotal system package. ('the Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval.) 3. Consider authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the City of Farmers branch extending the landfill use contract. Agenda Item 4 was moved forward as the petitioner for item 3 was not present. 4, public Hearings A. The Council held a, public hearing on the petition of Keith Shelton requesting historic landmark (H) zoning designation at 621 drove gtreat, The ptopetty was more particularly described, as lot 2 and the west 11 feet of lot 1, block 2, of the Woodland Addition. }L3Z The Mayot opened the public hearing, Nts Keith Shelton, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating' that a similar toanest had bison granted by the Council to Nr: A. W. Moos Ley. 'f he Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission, had both unanimously reoommended approval. The . property traced back to a land scrip in the 1600s with the house being constructed in 1024, Current zoning was multi-fagily I. A neighborhood group had been formed to protect the neighborhood. Dr. John Carrell, 601 Last College, spoke in favor stating that he was representing the neighborhood association, He felt fortunate to live in a neighborhood which reflected homes built in the 1920s and this request was supported by the association. Dr. Carrell stated that he had been impressed with the fact that the historic zoning ordinance viewed preservation as a public neceesity and was an effort to establish civio pride. The Shelton's property fell within the criteria established for the zoning, The plaque displayed on homes with historic zoning represented the responsibility of the owners to maintain the property and would permit retention of property values in the neighborhood. There had been objections from Texas Woman's University because this paroel was located in an area included in their master plan. TWU had offered to buy the Shelton home, but if sold, there would be no obligation by the university to maintain it. The current zoning in the neighborhood was MF -1 which meant that a developer could buy the property from TWU, tear down the home and build apartments, The currant master plan for TMU called for the bulldozing of all homes and tress for a paved parking lot. Dr. Carrell stated that he knew that the university had the power of emminent domain but the residents were trying to preserve the neighborhood. With historical designations for the Woolsey and Shelton homes, TWU would have to appear before the Historic Landmark commission prior to demolition. The Council could overturn 'the designation by a simple majority vote, Carrell further stated that he did not believe this was a onerous burden to TNU. The residents were asking that the designation be given in. order to maintain the neighborhood until the university was prepared to implement the master plan. The association was making that qualifying properties be awarded the historic designation and that the Council allow the neighbors to protect their property values. Council Member Riddlesperget stated that he had reservations about any home built sin,,* he could remember being historic and asked when the house was moved'onto the property. City ;CatlReil NiYaitee NeeLi~ et Iwr9eL y, lift Rape ilat 4s4#cp i wCwI i~ 6A1i4 Lbs Over Amp net all of toe oeitaria • L br the Nistot;eibi4,004uck 0000i0tio4, 000ee of this vintage represtated significant historical value to Denton. Council Member Aiddlespetger asked, when Texas Womaals University needed the property, could the home be moved. Carroll reapoAded yes, the otdiaapos would *Von allow for demolition it the Council so 'chose. The residents were asking for an interim alternate to protect the neighborhood, Council Member RiddloSlotfer stated that he had reoeived a letter froN a oitit*n compla sing about the restrictions placed on the property owner by the historic landmark designation and asked it the Shelton'$ were aware of these restrictions. Carroll responded yes. Council Member stophens stated that the structure was representative of an eta in Denton's past and asked it the neighborhood was united behind the petition. Cattail responded yet, by all neighbors who mere resident property owners, There had been one abstention by an owner who was an employee of TMU. CouAoil llembet Hopkins asked when the property had been toned multi-tastily. Carrell replied it was zoned for apartments prior to hie moving into the neighborhood in 1959. Council Member Hopkins stated that it appeared to be more feasible to back zone the property to single family, Dr. Carrell responded that be understood the question but this was a paradoxical situation. The residents wanted to remain in the neighborhood but had the constant fear of revisions in the TMU master plan. But it the area were toned single family, the neighborhood could deteriorate, Mary Hardin, Chairperson of the Historic Landmark Commission, reported that there had been unanimous approval of the Shelton petition so it had met 9 of the 13 criteria, Council Nember Riddlespergsr asked No, Hardin to comment on the criteria, Hardin responded that the Shelton home was an example of popular architeoturs of the 1920's and was in character with the other homes in the neighborhood, The Commission was trying to preserve these neighborhoods, h representative of the State Historical Registry had Visited Denton recently and had toured the city, one area which he had felt was worth saving was around the campus of TwU. The idea of historic preservation Ias not just to save old, fabl.tlous homes. Homes destroyed now would be gone forever and in 40 years, there would not be any loo year `old homes left. Hardin concluded by stating that she hoped the City Council appreciated the participation clad attendares by the neigllborhood at this hearing for it did show an interest in preserving the area. There had beep no opposition at the Historic Landmark Commission discussions or the hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Stewart stated that he could understand the residents of the neighborhood' trying to preserve the integrity but hated to see neighborhoods preserved by historical toning of homes. i IQ ~Ntates Mee 1..o i►agirat 7~ lops 1,406 sivom that the home was a yyclme example of how people live'8 duraq ;this era and that proteotiag the neighborhood was of Net ioiag on the oaks. Counoii Member Stephens stated that the commission did not seek and i agreed to accept estringent requirement trg utaintina ot.Commission Mr, John Lawhon, attorney for Texas woman's University, spoke in opposition stating that the university owned property on three sides of this property, the master plan had been approved six year a o and had been followed. "an Dr. Woolsey applied tot historic zoning, the university did not oppose the petition as it was only one home and they had no idea others would petition, The need tot parking space was critical, Tds university had not used 'the right of 004 negqt domain to displaoe homeowners. This particular house was not historical. It had begun with two bedrooms and one bath with an additional bedroom and both being added. Other modifications' had boon made and the original structure had been altered two times. Referonco had been made in the backupp rateriai to a grist mill which was located on McKinney Street but it'was not next to the house. The builder had, built approximately loo homes such like this. There was nothing special about this house. At the Planning and toning Commission fleeting, bullitt Lowrey had stated' that until :Twit made a, substantial ottor tot the ho#e, the ownsre should be allowed to maintain the property. The university had OASie. an otter but bad not heard book, The feeling was that it the property was coned hittorical, it would put the university in direct conflict with the Historic Landmark Commission and the City council. Thar! were two specific reasons why the university Objected it was in the TMU master plan anAl it was not a historic structure. Council Member Stephens asked why the university did not voice opposition before now. Lawhon responded there was no particular reason. The Mayor allowed Dr. Carrell to speak briefly in rebuttal, Dr. Carrell stated that the neighborhood association was in favor of the petition and did not presume to be experts on what was or was not historical. That was the )ob of the Historic Landmark Commission. The question before the Council was whether the Commission had done a proper yob, did the house meet the criteria and did the Planning and Zoning Commission meet their responsibility in recommending the house for the zoning. The Mayor closed the public heating. Denise Spivey, Dewiopment Review Planner, reported that 9 reply forms had been mailed with 5 returned in favor and 1 returned in opposition. This was the third request for the historic zoning in the TNU area. The petition for 619 had been approved and another petition at 630 Grove was approved by the PLt but denied by the Council. The older and distinctly residential character of this station of the city was quite strong and worthy of every available proteotion. Historic preservation 4)uld bring added attention to the Development Outdo policies defending protection of existing housing stock in older neighborhoods. As this area was zoned multi-family, the historic zoning classification could protect this area from the anooachmertr, of apartments. It would take six affirmative votes to approve the ordinance. Council Member McAdams stated that this was a wonderful area with lots of trees, The request had met the criteria and deserved _vu~ J~ .i ...d p7 01 . i• IililltM` AaMaat 31!! NIp ~..t 00tui iidtiOA• feat .'the , esksaiil 840414 690e0t the x"06- s~eB~atieR of ale' Mtstoria WaNMrk coaxrilaioa as they Were the. expor,tw, It tooto vote dittioxlties, psrhaps the historic Laadsark Zoning 4rdiasmae should be 4063404. Nahdeli motioa,'Stsphens aeaoad to adopt the`ordinahce approving the hiatOrto landmatk (fl) xoniag tot i2) GCOVO Otreet. OR roll 0411 vote) McAdams "aye," Hopkins "nay," stsphene: "ays," Alford "nay," Riddloaperger "nay," chow "ays," and Mayor Stewart "Ray." Motion carried tailed / to 3 with Council Members. Hopkins, Alford, Riddlesperger and Mayor Stewart casting the nay Votes. N. The Council held a ppublio hearing on the petition of M. D. Byrne, torer?eptinq the lf.M,C.A, of Mstcopolitan Dallas, onated at requesting a a- Itio uie permit. On an S.S9 acre tract located' the northwest corner of Windsor Drive and Riney Road, if appcoved, the specific use permit would allow the development of a Y.M.C.A. facility. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mc. M. D. Byrne, ropresshtiag the petitioner, spoke in favor stating td at the Raynor family had offered this land for the purpose< of providing for a YWA facility, The Planning and Zoning Commission had attached three condition, one of which' was foc a $ foot solid wood ten,.'e 41049 the north property liaG;, This particular strip was 900 feet loaf end it would cost appc'oxip,ately W000 to build this type of tease, the ptopetty abutted a wooded area to the north. AnOtbet Pit aoadi'tioa we$ that there be no signs a oept for socroboards, The YMCA would like to `glace a small sign on the property stating what was going to be built there. Ms. Ana Rocca Pena, owner 'ot' to cores across the street, spoke in opposition. Ms. Pena stated that Mr. Byrne was proposing to build athletic fields which would bring in 2,000 children. She had tried tot 2,years to have property in this same area toned, she was in the process of completing a third 'plat to bring to staff for a proposed development. Her; development would require paviaq of three toads` and she felt the YMCA petition was spot zoning, it approved, this particular facility would create traffio and parking problems. She stated that the YMCA did good work but felt it would devaluate her property value, The Mayor allowed Mr. Byrne to speak briefly in rebuttal. Mr. Byrne stated that the YMCA location in Dallas wag Very preatigous, The parking requirements were the sane as for commercial zoning, on Sunday, most of the residents who would use the YMCA would be in church which would alleviate parking and traffic problems, The facilities would include a swimming pool, a gym and Soccer fields, Mr. Byrne concluded by stating that he hoped there would be 2,000 children at the facility at one time but felt that was unrealistic. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that 10 reply forms had been mailed with 2 returned in opposition and 0 returned in ta,vor. This was in a low intensity area and the Denton Development Guide encouraged some land use diversity if protection was provided for. neighborhoods and adjacent housing, The Guide discouraged concentrations of multi-family, office, commerical and other, higher intensity uses. This petition met the 5 criteria of the Quids. The POZ had recommended approval with 3 conditions. Council Member Stephens stated that he had been involved with the YMCA in the past and knew that the need for facilities was great. He had spoken to the neighbors and they were in favor of the petition. Cif ~,1gM~e7~ 1~~~ t the follbwixs OC411"040 wes proesoutw: M0. S1-}4 AN 040IN,INCR ORANTINO A SPNCIVIC ASR' PERMIT FOR A YMCA PAe'tW 'Yf PROVIDt" POO TN6 0EPER00104 OP SUCH USE ON TM 20NINO MP OP TO CITY OF DKNTONt TEXAS, All SANE WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO ,TO COON OP ORDINANCE$ OF THE CITY OP Do", TEIIAS, IV l110INANCR NO. N-l, AND As SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMAT%wY 4.590 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OR DENTOta, TEXASI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens ma tion, Riddleiperger ssoood to adopt the ot41aanos with the 3 conditions sat by the Planning and Zoning commission and to allow tot a temporary sign. Olt roll call vote, HOAdars "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "ays," Alford "aye," Riddlesporger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Notion carried unanimously. Agenda It** 3 was hsard at this time. 3. Mr. Carl Young appeared before the Council requesting approval of a request for the use of Fred Moore PACK, with a waiver of the tee and tot a midnight ourtew, fat a Labor Day oslebration. Nr. ;OU0q stated that he was a Nembst of the Viet Nan Voterans hook I ation, The association worked with several Community pro)eoto and was requoptio$ the use of Pred .Motto Park for a Labor Day celebration, there Moµld be ball' tooinements, thjro* "nds, $ado snd domino contests amofig othsr aotivities, Free hot dogs would be furnished to children, Council Member Stephens asked what days would the association hold the celebration. Young responded August 31, ssptexber 'l and 3. The neighbors near the park 'mad been contacted and the celebration had support from the oomsuaity. Mayor Pro Tex Chew stated that he had spoken with Mr. Young and felt the Council should give Mr. Young another chance, Council Member Stephens asked who MOU14 clean up the park. Young responded that the Viet No* Veterans Association would clean up after the celebration. Mayor Stewart statsd that this request would bo placed on the agenda for August 13 for forral approval„ The Council then returned to the regulhr agenda order. C, The Council held a public hearing on the petition of George D. Sooggin requesting a change in zoning from the sin Is family (SP-7) classification to the two family (2F) classification at the northeast corner of MiyYle lowwood and J&;qusline Streets. Tile -5, block E, and property was more lots 6-12, block c, p of t the l Wyii H. Sa oes Addition. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. George Scoggin, the potitionat, spoke in favor stating that the staff had recommended approval and Mr. Claiborne of the planning and zoning commission had spoken in favor of the petition. The roquNt sat the land, use plan ;bit offering a buffer zone. Mr. scoggin ppresented a slide of the plit and stated that the development would increase fire pro I tootioa, provide attractive housing as well as an investment opportunity for low income investors. There was a demand in this area for duplexes. The land had been vacant or toned for 71 . Oit~r 4ftMdi1111autfA lidf6itl~ d! duggdt y, 1116 la~f Too 9s fit t4mil HMO goc over "pA 'Yo4is. At silo per Radar toot it vdpid co~tt A2.4,00 dust to build, the street, It the arch was tdsoaed tot duplo#os it woalb 4110M the extra margin' of tul►dd to 4*V*100 the PFo"tt . Mt. Sooggias stated that he now P90poR0 to build single story duplexes of btick and not wood cogstrmotion, The design varied from three to two bedrooms. Undsrgtound utilities would be installed. The oenttal teams was whether to build two-tamily or multi-tamily. Council Member Stephens stated that Mr. $Coggin& had mentioned many changes from the original petition, As he had made to many changes. it was logical to toter this back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Greg 1ldwar4e stated that the drainage situation had been addressed. The petitioner had looked at the master drainage plan and was following all of the elements. Charles Lamb}rt, architect, stated that the staff had been satisfied with the petition. Mt. J. D, TadXock, 1911 Merosdes, spoke in opposition stating that he had lived in the area since 1966, which was longer than Mt, Claiborne on the PU. The dewlopet had already "tlip.tloppdd" the plan and wondered it he would be honest, Mt, dooooins had told the neighbors that the duplexes would bi .two (homy and was now saying that theyy,•wOUld be ohs story; Mt, Tadlook stated that he behoved the development would be damaging to' property valuss'and would move multi-family housing closet to the aiagle tamily 'sorting, Ms. Betty Ford, 1006 Jacqueline, spoke in opposition' stating that there were aome very attractive duplexes in the neighborhood on Parvin and appartments on the corner. Her objection was to the potential drainage problems, There was rental property in the area which was used by North takss state University students. There was a lot of traffic 1A the area. Mr. Ctrl Vorte, 1107 Oakwood, spoke in opposition stating that he owned the adjacent property to the north. To the east was the Oakwood baptist Church and felt there was a question on whether or not a road would be out in, He also felt the two-family Zoning would increase the density and property values might be affected. The duplex` zoning would only be an advantage to the developer. There would be traffic and drainage problems, The petition had been recommended for denial by the Planning and Zoning Cocrsission due to opposition from the neighbors. Council Member Stephens asked where the proposed road would be in relation to Mr. Farre's property. Ferre responded the street would be east of his property. He would like to see the area developed as single family. No, Janie Stauffacher, 1106 Oakwood, spoke in opposition statinq that no one had addressed the issue of the street that was not there. The developer had promised several things. This patitian was for zoning only and the neighbors wanted assurance on the type of housing which would be constructed. There was no room for a street. This issue had beau in contention for 20 years, me. Stauffacher asked that if the toning was granted, would the council please apply a condition which would require maintenance of the street. Mr. Robert Mhitaker, 1110 Oakwood, spoke in opposition stating that there were sewer problems which would increase if more houses were built. The Mayor allowed Mr. Scoggin to speak briefly in rebuttal. City C!0wAoil 14$40 too N"tiIN of A40st 70 ltld MaN awn Mr, 64" ins 'otatod rsletivt t the iaM tot tho too/~ thi Ohgreh 040 #tAs sad of 00"44 leavlap a 4 toot right»of»wa Pot All of the strsst was paved. The street would be split with the dovaloFpere haViaa 20 toot of right-of-way and would hook 1A, with a kwood, There would probably be }top signs 0041 adequate room for a Curve. The_ Street would Continue into JO cquoline, There would be 51 toot between the private property AM the sidewalk, Drainage and sewer improvements would be "doe The 'plan had not boon "!lip-!lopped"I he was trying to accommodate the neighborhs Council Member Hopkins asked Mr. Scoggins if he owned the property tot the street, Scogdins responded nos she property was owned by R. H. Turnbull who claimed no right. The Oakwood Sar'.ist Church had the easement and he had asked thew if they would dedicate the easement to the developer. Council Membor McAdams asked if Mr. Scodgine would consider planned developmont Zoning. gcoggins replied yes. The mayor closed the public hosting. Dania* B ivoy, Development Review Planner, .reported that 26 reply totms. mad boon Mailed with i returned in favor and S returned in Oppd itiOn, The petitioner planned to o0aettuot a Maximum' ot, 10 dupplekie. Viilowood street Vae a Oollootor Street gad - public utilitioe were in place. This Vas a moderate inteasity area and duplexes would help to provide a' diversification of housing, At the publio heating before the Planning and Zoning Commission, many neepphboto had opposed the petition. It would require six atfirwative votes to approve the p*titton, it referred back, the Pit would not reconsider the petition for one year, council Member Hopkins stated that he felt the petition should be referred to the PiZ with the new information which had been provided in an effort to workout the problems. Council Member Stephens stated that the petition had taised more questions than it had answered. Stephens motion, Chew second to deny the petition. Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of Christopher Bancroft requesting a change in Zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned development (PD) classification on a 19.9 acre tract located on the south side of Highland Park Road approximately 1,500 foot east or Bonnie Brae Road. It approved, the planned development would permit 71 lots for single family detached use (minimum lot sire of 7,000 square feet) and a two tore tract rese:/ed for a private school. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Christopher Bancroft, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that there were two reasons for this development a person' had already agcood to be the landlord tot the school and market research had 'shown a demand for this type of single fns{ily housing. The pro3oot would begin construction let* in '19a4. This was a logical time and place tot this type of development, Jack Barton distributed photographs of the streets in the pzoposod development and spoke in opposition stating that he did not understand the nature of the request. There would be problems with this development feeding into streets which were already in terrible condition. The street situation was vague' and he was aonot'rned o~ti QOU~~il Nis►atek` ?i tsN o! Autnet 7, 1044 ►s" ""Iw #pO,Mt tkedlio, ikverreae was' tomiliot'4ith tbe'traiao Situ do oa Teaslell Gage which 444 booons a nitht'Oste. Wt. bartoo stated thit he helisved this 4svslop"at w40 premature and that the developer Should get together with the neighborhood groups and talk out their problems, mark Atkinsr RM Highland Park Road, spoke in opposition Stating that Highland Park toad was the only aoohst in aoo oq'+ of the proposed development$ sonata sraa from Highland Park l;oaO, south of the Santa Pe railroad -track, was only 16 or 17 toot Wide, Cars parked up and down the road at the sates Stable$ and Airport Road fed into an industrial -area. 'traffic was already awful, and the addition of 71 more single family homes, and a private school would only make the problem worse. A Sheraton hotel was being constructed at the intstsection of 1-35 and sonnie srae at Avenue D. Mr. Atkins concluded by reading from an article in the Denton Record-Chrontole regardin the Dantoo Development Guide's criteria for intensity and traffic iapa0t on development areas. Mr. P. A, $sker, i;03 Wisteria, spoke in opposition stating that there were three streets in the 4aural Addition which had vacant lots, and vacant homes. He could not see the economics of adding another Addition in the acme area. The 0101k did not show what type of, housing would be built. The city could not maintain the oristing struts. Mr, William A. stookslaa, 1106 Wisteria,' opoks`in opposition'otattag that, he ;Vas ooncarn d that Hiyplaad Park Road WAS not adequate at the precept time and the sew development would cause teaideats to use,Wisterio as an alternate, routs, The new tract would provide tar a private school snd'one was already in the area. Mr, John rields, 1606 Highland Park Road, spoke in opposition stating that there was currently traffic in front of his house all night. Thor* weta, not school which miaat they ewould have Students be in tha, driven r to school, priThis would increase the traffic even mote. Mr. James, 7106 Azalea, spoke in opposition stating that the paving contractor had to resurface the attest due to a roller coast effect caused by heavy traffio. Additional traffic was not needed as it would cause the same problem on other streets in the area. The Mayor allowed Mr. Bancroft to speak briefly in rebuttal. Mr, Bancroft Stated that the staff had addressed the street issue and that the City had directed the planned development approach. The Mayor closed the public heating. Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that LO reply forms had been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 5 returned in opposition. The site was located in a low intensity area and according to the Denton Development Guide, low intensity areas represented the primary housing ateas of the City and should emphasize residential use. This proposal was located immediately south of the Lanrel Addition and was a logical continuation of the existing land us* to the north. The five key criteria for low intansity residential areas wares 1. Strict rite design control is provided within one block of existinq low density residential 2, the overall density/ intensity standard is not violated 3. traffic planning ensures access by a collector Street or larger and not through local low density streets r 77- Pas l irtsoA a. aft of ~ pteam apace Berea to provided for X44goatioaal ~apilit~M t, Wit.:.iate plar+ning blr the aeighboihood has boon soiidited This xwaest C0~ %1$4 with the agton Develop m dt Amos PO 0tof of empbasistag re1=44 ial land use in low intensity ersae, its not aooeoeo4 by a collector street or latget, the private school Otte rkin reat rioooA n 4 approval with p I condi ion$. The ion ar~atriotion vids am condition attached by the POt had been removed by the City Attorney. council member NoAdams asked how it was anticipated to handle the traffic. Jerry Clark, city Engineer, reported that there were acosss problems, The Traffic Engineer had looked at the site and felt thee* robless could be handled. Access to Highland Park Road would be denied by bhanneliration or traffic buttons, The entrance to the development should be relocated so that acoess would be to Wisteria and Donnie Ira*. #hite this did not prtoteoly most the Denton Development outdo policios, the development plan should be evaluated on its mat its, Highland Park Road war ;~)t built to the master thoroughtare plan but might be expanded (ir, to this deVelopment. As the area developed in the future, the access problems would be addr4aaed, Council Mombar Hopkins asked if there were any other plats in the area which would utilise there streets. Clark responded no. Council Nember McAdams asked it the area on Highland Park Road was a dedicated street. Clark responded nol it was a dedicated alley, Council Member Stephens statsd that he had driven in the proposed development atom and there was not room for two-way traffic, Hs felt the proposal was premature. Clark tsported that single family $its$ were not often proposed to the Planning and Zoning Commission and they had felt the value of the overall development would offset the traffic problems. Council Member Stephens stated that Highland Park Road was very narrow, had no curbs and there vote sharp corners. He felt this was a safety hasatd. Clark responded that traffic would follow the path of least resistanos, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for approval had been based on the feeling that there was a need to encourage single family development, Council Member McAdams asked it it was not true that every effort would be made to impede the use of Highland Park Road, Clark responded yes. Council Member McAdams stated that a single family development in thie area would be a real plus but she was concerned about the amount of traffic which would be generated by the private school, Clark' replied that the numbers used by staff to calculate traffic who SS oar trips pet dayper acre for single family and 170 oar tripe per day tot a school. The petition was for a planned development. The petitioner could remove the school fro* the plan and construct only the single family dwellings, I ftit~ ~®Ywt ~ Z If~gYtee 1Ne i~l e! August 7, 1944 taro surteelk Caawbil Nobsr 4900so stoto teat 'thi'o $ee«a lilts startiAl at the other eM of tbo world amd trYial to let back, Council` Molober piddlespergor stated maybe the petition should be tabled to allow time to work out the traffic problems. Council Member Stephens stated it tabled, it should be tot a specific period of time, Riddlesperger notion. Alford second to table the request tot a maximum of three months, Council Member Stephens stated he would like for staff to tie this petition With her developments in the atea and the street situation et Council Itonber Hopkins stated that he would like for the developer to have time to work out the problems and have staff do s study on the engineetial aspects and the traffic intensity and accessibility, Motion to table for a maximum of three months passed unanimously. 1. The Council '.,etp a public Aeeciaq on the petition of Douglas Nusnschel, repteseutihq Good Samaritan vitlafts (PV-21) at 2600 Hinkle Drive. The current PD aite plan permitted the development of a senior oitisea tetiremeat ooKplex, health Center oomplex, adult, day Cate center, nine (9) duplexes and three (3) tripplexes. The pstitianor desired to Construct three (3) additional `duplaxes on the site. The Mayor opened the public hearinq. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Denise Spivey, Developaant Review Planner, reported that 10 reply focus had been mailed with 1 returned in favor and 0 t►turned in opposition. This was a request for an amendment to the original planned development for the bond Samaritan Village to add three more would duplexes. property had Access to the existing planned developsnt~et and the aduition The following ordirsanos was presentedl NO. 84-96 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDED SITE 'PLAN THEREFOR, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX B-ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DEt>TON, TEXAS AS SAID SITE PLAN APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 27.437 ACRES OF LAND, M)RE OR LESS, OUT OF THE ROBERT 39AUMORT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 311 AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, Chew seoond to adopt the ordinance. on roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye,,, Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlespergsr "aye," Chew "aye," and mayor SC'Jwart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 6, Ordinances A. i'hs Council considered adoption of on ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 81.44 acres of land located on the south side of Paige Road and along the west side of Swisher Road and north of the MKT Railroad. d`1 oirrrtt cvoowpppl Minutes o$ Litt eaugust 7,` 1014 !barren Jagagn veyo o pent Review Planners re.arted that tuis was the tinaa action on thi1 annexation, Adoption of the ordinance would accept the setviue plan. The following ordinance was presentedl NO. 14-97 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT Of LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS) BEING ALL THAT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL Or LAND CONSISTING Or APPROXIMATELY $1.11 ACRES Or LANG LYING AND BEING DITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AO BEING PAST OIL THIS G, WALKER $URVEY, ABSTRACT NO. X310, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS! CLASSIrYING THE SANE AS AGnICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford Mays," Riddl$$peVgot "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an Ordinance and service plan annexing approximately 470 acres of land beginning 350 feet south of and perpsndioular to the center line of U. S. Highway 310. tharron Jarman. Development Review Planner, reported thYa Was the final action on this annexation. The following ordinance was presented: NO. 84-9$ AN OADINAMW ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS! BEING ALL THAT LOT, '"RACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 170 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND SKING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE N. FORREST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 117, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS! CLASSIFYING THE SAKE AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY! AND DEC9M ING'AN EPPECTIV11 DATE, Chew potion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, Nohdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "jAye," Alford "aye," Riddlespetget "Aye," Chew "aye," and Mayo: Stewart "aye." Motion carried unaniscuUly. 0. Tht~ Council considered adoption of an ordinance changing the name of Ridgeway Drive to Lillian Miller Parkway, Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that the requeat had been reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning ant Zoning Commission. Ridgeway Drive had not been technically accepted by the city, Naming the street Lillian Miller Parkway would be done at the formal acceptance. Mayor Stewart asked why the request had been reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission. 8 Ivey responded that was the normal procedure fat a street name change. Streets being named of renamed in the county were referred to the Denton County Historical Commission, Council Member Stephens stated that many Dentonites knew Council Membet Miller who had given lengthy and exemplary service to the community, Ridgeway was the working title of the street and because it was to close.to Ridgecrest,' he felt it would be fitting to change the name to Lillian Millet Parkway. Me. Miller was the first woman I; city, Catiaei,l Niautas, MeotiA Of August _7, 1$44 Mare t soon slotted to' the Tfoaton city Couaoilt s a charter wenbwr at the Dolitoa° 'Couaty 0t410 . hoard when it V461716004 to 1000 'Was a member of the North Texas state University Taoglty VIVO Club, a member of the Nu4ineas-and Professional wOwe014 Q1ub, President ppf the Menton Association f Christian 104040 an instructor and Administrator of Catechism at '•mmaoulate Cono$Ption Catholic ChU oh, a delegato to the NVAOA41',~ +tocratio Convention in 19731 precinct chairperson and *loot ion judo and member of the Leagus of women Voters, No, Miller was 014-L04 to the City Council in April of 1973 and served until her death n June of 1971. Stsphens stated that it felt it would be appropriate to honor Ms. Miller in this manner, The following ordinance was prssentedi No. 81-99 AM ORDINANCe OF THE CITY OF DUMN TEXAS PROVIDINO FOR THE RKMAMINO OF RIDOEwAY DAWN, VPOM ITS APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE by TUN CITY OF DRNTON AS A PUaLIC S'TREST, SITUATED WITHIN TUX CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, TO LILLIAN MILLEA PARKwAy mD DECLARING AN arricTIVE DAn. Stephens notion, Chow ssoond to adopt the ordinance. Mayor Stewart asked where would the Council stop to rsnaning streets. Council Member Stephens' responded that this was not renaming as the city had not accepted the street, Ho had chocked with David Dunning, the developer about the naming of the street, Mr. Dunning had stated that they had called it Ridgeway beoause they had to call it something. Council Member Afddlesp*rger stated that all who knew Ms. Miller had a great affection tot her and it would be imposeible to vote against her but felt perhaps naming a park for her would be more appropriate. Council Member Stsphtmo; stated that this would be a major thorough- fare and the acne would be remembered, Council Member Alford stAteo that although the street was not foGmally named at this tiuo, many people retorted to it as Ri67eway. He had received phone calls from citizens who had a problem with this ttna,+sinq. Mayor Stewart stated that there already was a Miller Street in Denton, He personally had great respect for Ms. Miller but oititens had also been calling him wanting to know where the Council started and stopped nosing streets after people. The Council then took a vote on the motion. On roll call vote, McA4ams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephan$ "aye," Alford "nay," Rid4lesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "nay." Motion carried 5 to 2 with Council Member Alford and Mayor Stewart casting the nay votes. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance allowing the city secretary to microfilm official uity records. Vic- Boyer, Administrative Assistant, reported that he had been working with the City Attorney on the legal aspects of microfilming reoor4e. There were approximately 200,000 documents in the vault and 20,000 were being' added each year. The older records were presently being sent to storage at the warehouse. These older records were beginning to dotetiorate. Microfilming would provide a back-up set of records which would be stored oft-site in Case of a natural disaster, ouch as fire, The purpose of the ordinance was to meat the state statute requirements. The estimated cost at, the microfilming would be $10,200. { Ott Cauitioil k~Ant~~ we jig of August 9, 1184 !490 44v4AtMA The following 6t4tA400e WOO PCOSOAtOdl NO. 04-100 d AN ORDINANCk Or THE CI'T'Y OF DRNTON, TEt~,\S PROVIQINQ FOR MICROFILMING OF OFFICIAL CITY 41CORDS1 SP%CIPYINQ THE TYPES OP 82CORD1 TO 49 XICrtOTILM1101 IN IRINQ t"ICEB TO MICROFILM R0C4RDS1 RRQUIIIINQ MICROFILM TPO N'MRT "QUINJIl 'S OF. THE VNITRD STATER OF ANRRICA STANDARDS INSTITUTRI REQUIRING THE CITY 88CRI11ARY TO CERTIFY THAT EACH MICROFILM RECORD 18 A TRUE AND CORRECT DUPLICATION OF THE ORIQINA4 PUBLIC RIICOMCT AND QUARANT011ING THE PUBLIC FORE ACCRSS TO INPORMATION ON THt MICROFILM TO WHICH THEY ARE ENTITLED BY LAW Alon PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Stephen$ notion, Chew second to adopt the ordiaaace. On roll 0411 vote, MOA4&ms "AYs," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," RiddlosVsrger "aye," Chew 04yo," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously, E, The Council considered adoption of an otdinance establishing a mandatory pet registration program tot the City of Denton, 9111 Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported that this item had been disoussed previously. The pet registration proQraml 1. would allow the animal control staff to establish the number and location of animals i'A the city z. would help to control tabito as animals could not be registaced without proper vaccination s. would be less holding time in the center as staff would be able to notity,the `Pat owner 4, would allow staff to plan services and budget requirements more accurately 5, some of the cost of services at the Animal Control Center would be bor,pe by the pet owners and not of the all taypayers Every pet owner had bad an Animal escape, If the pet was registered, the owner would be notified and would not Rave ~o drive around looking for the lost pet. The program had reoeivea support from the Humane Society, Counoil Member Hopkins asked how many pet owners did staff expect would participate. Angelo responded approximately 76% during the first year, depending on the promotion and enforcement of the program. Council Member McAdams asked if other neighboring cities had this type of program. Angelo responded yes, Counci:t Member McAdams asked what was the participation rate In these other cities. Angelo responded the participation varied on the promA ion of the program and the enforcement but the rate was approximately 40% to 60%, Council Member Riddlesperger asked what would happon if a oat was impounded, Angelo replied the owner would have to registor the cat before it would be released from the Animal control center. tit 0. "Ott 14 Wee Nice iq«« of August 7, 1904 page Ightpoq Deborah" Sholton, ro reagattAq too 00004 ou"aa society, stated that the society was to favor of the program beoause; 1. the registration fees would help to offset the *Vat lnoreastag cost Ot'anisal control services 2. the registration process would help to eduoate pet owners to their rosponsibility to the community 3, the program would help to unite lost pets with their owners The Humane Society also oaoouraged the neutering of pets as there was a tremendous problem With strays, Cheryl Lange stated that she was in favor of registration but she owned 1 pets and had paid $200 to have the pets vaccinated and neutered. She did not feel ohs should have to pay the additional registration too for it plaosd the burden on responsible pot owners. She also stated that she felt the fee for un-neutered pets should be $10, Council 'Member Nopkins asked it No, Lange thought the $3 registration fee wag too much or would a $1 tee be more reasonable considering the advantages of the program. Ms. Lange responded that she felt it the fee ware too high, less people would voluntarily register their pets, The following ordinance was presented: NO. `$4-101 AN ORDINANCE' AMENDING CHAPTER / ("ANIMALS") OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TO REQUIRE CURTAIN ANIMALS SE RESUAINSD BY A LEASH, FENCE OR ENCLOSED STRUCTURE; BY ADDING A MEN SECTION PROVIDING FOR THE REGIBTRATION,OF DOGS AND CATS; ESTABLISHING FEES THEREPORI REQUIRING IDENRIPICATION TAGS TO BE WORN BY DOGS AND CATS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TNO HUNDRED ($200.00) 'DOLLARS FOR VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SFVSRABILITY CLAUSE: AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. kiddlesperger motion, Chow second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdam$ "Sys,' Hopkins "aye," Stuphens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlespergsr "aye," Chow "aye." and Mayor Stewart "aye." Notion carried unanimously. Council Member Stephens stated that he would ll),e to see a report on the effectiveness of the program after it was iuplemented, 6. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign utility permit forms and utility joint use agreeaentc fror& the Texas State Highway Department, The following resolution vas presented: R E S O L U T 1 O N WHEREAS, it is neoesoary from time to time for the City of Denton to apply for a utility joint use agreement or utility permit involving construction within the State Highway Department right-of-way in the city of Denton; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to obtain agreements and permits from said Highway Department tot said construction; and ,:vet aeu~+ik Mnvt~ 14" of August 91 IM Page Mli46044 MIIime the C`tv. N40440r theouqh his office wakes Application for said coastrltotioAl MON, THRRRPORR, RR IT RRSOLV%D by THR COUNCIL ON TAR CITY OF D19WTO11, TRXASI 11=19M I. That the City Council of the City of Denton hereby auehori:es the city. Manager acting in his official capacity to execute the Appropriate documents as an official representative of the City of Denton. PASSED ARID APPROVRD this the 7th day of August, I!14. IC D 0. STRMAR , MAYOR CITY Of' DRNTON, TRXAS ATTESTI CHALO TAE GLEN, CI SRCRRTARY CITY OF 6twmli, TEXAS APPROVED As TO LRGAL FORMI JOB D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNRY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY. Riddlesparger Notion, Chow $00004 that the resolution be passed. On roll call vote, McAdams "oyh " Hopkins "ayo," Stephens "aye," Alrcrd "aye," Riddlesperger ".aye," Chew "aye." and Mayor Stewart "aye." Noti00 Carried unanimously. 7. The Council considered approval of an a moment with Joe Below for participation in a new water line on his property from Windsor Drive along Locitst Street to Hercules Lane. City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this was a standard agreement form, Hopkins motion, Chew second to approve the agreement for participation in a new water line with Joe Below, Motion carried unanimously, e. The Council considered approval of a contract with Rady and Associates for temporary engineering plan review. City Manager Chris Hartung reported that there had beer, a turn over in the Engineering Department and the staff was reviewing a great many plans, Rady and Associates 41d not havo a conflict of interest with the city and the contract would be ended when the vacant position in engineering was filled. Hopkins motion, Alford second to approvu the contract with Rady and Associates. Motion carried uanisouely. 9. The Council considered a utility revenue bond election, City Manager Chris Hartung reported that staff had contacted the city's financial advisors and bond counselors regarding the Chanter provision on bond' elections. The bond counselor had stated that this charter provision was inconsistent with current state statutes, There had been a similar situation in the City of Austin. On the timing, if the bonds were not sold by the end of September, the city could not sell until early in 1985 due to the audit which would begin in October. city Cow~ail Nlaute~ 1Ne app of Augnst 1114 P490 sty Couaai~~:1NMyyoY 1tl+aliMP•rq~ Ito fpp that he ha4 e3tprala04 hi6solt on this `ihoonrlstenoy. T 4 940pohs ~llity.to issue 00446 was the Aity Council's aad he colt it wou14 be Wait to the voters to tell there they could have a non•biadiag referendum. Me believed it was the duty of the Council to make the decision and proceed. Council Member McAdams stated the city had to have the bond money and it would not be Wise to spend the money to hold an election which would only be a popularity contest. Council Member Stephens stated that he bs#ieyod the Council Could trust the Denton Public And Celt that they would approve the bond sale, He had taken an oath to uphold the Charter, Toe Charter had not been changed and the Attorney General had not made a ruling. The public had spoken at the ballot box and he did not feel inclined to ignore that. Council Member Mo%dmms stated that the state law superseded the City Charter. Council Member Stephens stated that was only the opinion of the bond counselor, Council Member aiddlosperger stated that he wished the Council could pass this on to the public but the Council must take the responsibility. 'rho legal advisor was competent and had stated that an election was not required. Council N*abet Stephens then stated that he WO concerned about due process. If the Charter was inconsistent with state statutes, the Charter should be revised. Stephens Motion to hold the utility revsnue bond election on September Is at had been previously presented. There was no second. Motion died. 10, Thar* was no official motion on Sxeoutive session items of legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. 11, No new items of business were suggested for future agendas, The Council then convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments, No official action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was ad)ournsd. RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY 15300 City council Minutes August 13, 1984 The Counoil'conVoned ",nto the special Called meeting at 4M pose. in the council Chambers. PRES Ts Mayor Pro Tess Chewy Council Members Alford, Hopkins, PRESET McAdams, Riddleepergsr and Stephens City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ABSENTi Mayor Stewart 11 The Council considered approval of tho request by Mr. Carl Young 'or the use of Fred Moore Park, with a waiver of the fee And the midnight curfew, for a Labor Day celebration on August 31, September 1, and September 3, 1984. This item had been previously discussed. Hopkins m tion, Alford second to Approve the use of the ark wit a waiver of the fee and with a midnight curfew, Motion carried unanimously, 3 2, The Council considered Approval of the Institution of annexation proceedings on a tract of land consisting -)f approxi- mAtelq 11.2 acres of land located north of 1-35E and southeast of MayhilI Road. xr6 This 'item had been previously discussed, The to'lowing ordinanoe was presentedi 140. 84- AM ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT (.0 TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 11.1 ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF DENTON, STATE 6F TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE M.E,P, 6 P.R.R. COMPANY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 950 AND THE 0. WALKER SnVEY ABSTRACT NO, 1330t DENTON COUNTY TEXAS, CLASSIhINO THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Stephens motion, Hopkins second to institute annexation proceedings. On roll call vote McAdams "ayQ," Hopkina "aye," Stephens aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye,` and mayor Pro Tem Chew "aye." Mottun carried unanimously. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No officiat action was taken. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. t~~ii ►.~K"._CaEG; t~(i Yat~F~tb"''CF~t__J CHMOT IT EN SEC%ETXRT 1531C j { CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING; October 16, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N: Consent SUBJECT: Purchase Order M66181A GEORGE STRACENER SUMMARY: This purchase order is for thf) emergency purchase to, Geor o's, Plumbing for the. moving' and repair of septic tank outflow lines on the landfill property, The existing lines were in the way of the slurry wall that needed to be built at the new landfill thereby necessitating immediate removal and replacement. ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS: 631-002-030M-9101 Landfill Capital Funds RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this emergency purchase for the material and labor to reroute and reinstall these lines so use of the septic tanks could continue and the slurry wall could be.built as required, EXHIBITS; Purchase Order Copy -in oice Statement SUBMITTED BY: CG ~lle:l A Z_' 1. Jdh - Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 215 H. MOKINNEY 9T, IpUROHAN OADER DINTON, TX 7=1 P. 0. NUMBER DATMENDOR NO DOCUMENT TYMI 6101 A 09/445/04 CIO S 4FA44UOI VSNDDR,, SHIP TO; GUUkG4; SUACt NI 0 CUNf INNATIUN ONLY k VU 1 00 NUT OUNLICA1E WkNTON• 7X 762U1 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUNT 01 6JI 006? 010H 91. U1 1400 REKOUTV 7 SEPTIC LINCS 66600.00 TOTAL FOR P.U. 5x600.00 The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No, 20. Reference P,O. Number on all K Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indloated, Sand lrt4010a,70: Diet All TO; City of Denton, A4courlfe Payable ` John J, Marshall, 6P.&A, "~rchas160 Agent 215 E. McKlnney St., Denton, TX 7=1 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Aest. Purchasing Agent Phone 817ra t3a= 81 7158883 1 1 DIFW Metro 267-004 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer S\ STATEMENT GEORGE'S PLUMBING SOTIC tAmK4' PHON1 312-004 CASH ON DELIVERY - LICENSED, 90NDED, AND INSURED ROUTI NO. 1, BOX 46" DENTON, TEXAS 76201 DATE. ..................1.........,,r,..... r ADDRESS. 11,. CITY DESCRIPTION AMT. I cta r Q f f r 6 771 r CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OP MEETING: October 16, 1984 COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM N: Consent SUBJECT: Purchase Order #65197 MAHANEY INTERNATIONAL SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the emergency engine repair of our vehicle number 2020 for the Solid Waste Department by the Vehicle Maintenance Department. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this purchase order for the emergency repairs be approved for $3,658.95 as shown on the invoice and purchase order copy as attached for equipment #2020. EXHIBITS: Purchase Order Copy Irw ice Cop SUBMITTED BY: ,t l~!✓--~ . i' John''J, a shall, C,P,M, =purchasing Agent 0"'00' , 0 9NTo'WTOEXAS 215 E. MoKINNOY 6T, INNONIA81 OR09A nENTON, TX M01 P. 0, NUMBER DATEN6NDOR NO, DOCUMONT Ty" 65197 10101104, GAiAA" S MAH49000 nNDOR: SHIP TO*, MA14ANAY INTERNATIONAL P,u• ti OX 580 MCKINNr Y. TX. 75069 ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO, LINE AMOUNTi dl 710 004 0695 8710 1 2090 REPAIR ENGINE 3#656*95 TOTAL FOR P.O• .3*668.95 The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No, 20. Reference P,O. Number on all all, Shipments and Invoices, Shipments are F.O.S. City of Denton, or as indicated. SwW Involo" ;TO: Direct All O quld" T0: City of Dimoo Accounts Payable John J, Marshall, CAM.'0s r6hai inp'Aont 215 E. McKinney I t,, Denton, TX Mki Tam D, Shaw, CAM, Asst.' Purchaslnq AW1 Phone 81715868223 81716813 l1 D/FW Metro 2870042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer FART NO. ~ .....nic RIrTION~ OTT, PRICE AMOUNT 1 u 18 • MAHANAY IN'T TIONAL, INC, Hlway 78 No, 0 00 Phone $42.1201 < < ~ ~ 0+11 2~1•~3 PIV -77 MoKINNE 71SOffNE"I 011 T 7, OISCL" XI;PJMitif'~K/1i. " » . A WefTMNN M 111 ~ /Y ere those 1111011110 by "MM Yb~.t.,. y4At.t..,...,.,..,...,...,.,.,.. 1ach"st TM eefw Wobll owes* " dleele6 eM weEEw,ow ShOw ex. PON 1j gllYhlit bii l1'411410' Itd; IY; bA6Y11 M 1t wer►eMy eR 1ia~Ms F KNOW He$ FLEET • ~ Nw b Me►NwIM INMPoee, aaA wNM NO. +wN1+eE eWAW fw adholotee ow Slow wow to 04"m to IN 0" QA ❑ cx [A P udnob. tivo aEM~ Nre nie 1 NMw wva *f w M MIM wWi N.a r MaaW. w N,I Nw N ' MwMt Nw.~ w1YeM Er. Y k Of Ill S N/Wy. 7% Mr NM. Ae ~Ar~► w,A1w~M't' Min ti i~NY N~ ~1w1 w~bf~ !►~waw~ Mw 6Mwe M :wr+ +rM►. w~ MN NMNMM~ kk NiN N M SMiMM M !M IAMM vMkM N M gaMM d" IeO~Nn ow *N N "W n~o4~: N IM N 1M*. IMh t MYM a a~ M1MM IWWA A~w aM' tUYn wMM xM, 1hN1 M OMMf aMwNY M dW N YMM e•Mywrcr W ►W 04 "4* 0114"N !V TkONl2Eb PATE OKKAOTION DESCRIPTION S~ PARTS RORwARDED ►ROM BACK 0- _ TOTAL PARTS AMOUNT ►.O, 7 NO. ANb MATiI11A~ 1 ry ' _ A INTERNAL SUMMARY RtCAPITULATION X X X Q7a, MOTOR OIL N TOTAL OTHER CHARGES AtcT; CHARGE I C' V HAVE INSPECTED AND TESTED THIS UNIT, THE LOS. OCAR LUBRICANT LAeoR~ M,c. < E~ ABOVE REOAtRS HAVE BEEN MADE TO MY SATIg• Lea. wNL. ORO, aAtASt CARTS Y FACTION. I HEREBY ACCEPT THIS UNIT AND CHARGES MISC, SUPPLIES SUPPLIED Pit u AS LISTED, LOANaOR a MATERIAL! v+ WM TAX (A1►IICA ICABUt) RECEIVED BY d AUTNOIIIEEb aNENAYVIIE - DATE TOTAL SUPPLIES TOTAL AMOUNT J, r~r I'l AHANAY INTERNATIONAL INCM Hwy 75 at 3$ P. 0, Box 680 ' w►•, MOKINNEY, TEXAS 75089 1342-1201 Dallas 231.3305 Z 10% 'RESTOCKING CHARGE ON ALL RE711iiNE0 PARTS, Ali r SOLD TO SHIP TO ,?IS h' I.1C1CIP1Fif:f I {7 CIqT CN Tx 76211) J CASH CHa, Cfuw1 I iIv ! Dili L. J I ACCT. 40, L (ii.11 i,ti • UWOMM OIIOM Nor wo. ffo, Plot* WVOKI oAn 1 t INVOICE ,666 101 6 `15186 1- u p M ) ~ I : I FI'I NO, QUANTITIES VE R PRICES at c PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION -ION CDC, lI 1 111 }0 ARINci 4 . 30 a, C IS 19O10ej(I Krr,m, 17 .7^ 1.41.5'0 t?;}1, 1 0 1 IE!0126 0 E~E.,AR I1. f3 1011. V.) S''," . ;1 a a7 . s,o j p I >C;I'11 X30 >i-on ~:f r Ii`.s,~IO 8. I0, , 11. j D 1 1siMK, ('1'11.1 i`11 to 10 j CI l t0cl92 1 r1 KP1 1' 1 U 1 LU` tU11RIt11_ra1't J,~`.' j a I .~'rh r.111.. 'rl:r j l'J 1 10 1 L.I`f)K LL3C.li t!. e j U 1 10001 1.K LOON I L7 l 0,-I I'f'"r' Cf4'1 .',r'Ir1 `U p;g1; 1 0 l f'115C 3 M16C; ~ 0 .0 fa J .3i1 1 !:~,i I AT l a 17 30OaIoII:X r'f'l. fIf?r'~CI 1r!J. I f 1 `'•ji. . 0 CCII~f I:or'ip R to f)Yit~ . } 1~Ip . 0 .0f1 I U 1 11~ t45 i7 I.'.llrl I.•:''• }.':11 j (1 1 F F N+ 310',i f= 11.1, t: F 1 0 j 99i 2 4 f; I CL.r eh11' PLOY 1 I I 11 i1 , i c 1 9744707N2 6A j U..T ~rl I , Li 51 SHIP DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT AMOUNT VIA w X - I , y 1 MAHANAY INTERNATIONAL INC. . Hwy, l! oI 380 P. 0. Box 680 MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75088 542.1201 Dallas 231-3305 10% RESTOCKING CHARGE ON ALL RETURNED'PARTS, ca 001 MONO SOLD TO SHIP TO r CI'T'Y OF DMT0N '1 PAOt r 2.15 !i ' i'1CK t NNF`' DE NTON TX 76201 CAIN c110. COW61t F 'k rl12 n 111 m) L. J ACCT. NO. L 001"7 GOA" ►r~c►~tu o~oai►a, ".0.010. Igvoc1 OATI to^ INVOICE Ebb 1014 'i506 1-8N p- tai} 1 t210'1 pt'I NOS :37 QUANTITIES PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION VENDOR PRICES Doci No !moo -91N 1-0Z ;y U 3 670 I F?cll: J 1 I f' LtaY Al ; 63 4, 4 ~;i 13 0 S '.p 9-'117 (p12 i.~JIATFR E 114:3t,- 1 66 4 12 C1 ! 0 1 99021C2f S'1'W,' LFO)K 1IISfILI-Y' J U 1 I'll U13 11;1Sc 1,1 .00 ;i 1 t~ l f1lSC3 t"I1'13c U.Ufi 1.x'!5 1.9`.: CZ1 'S I TI' I NG J I~ .?U1i1l.Q f:Z l,jL r 1.'',, .f11.1 Iii ! 0 J 1 t14,iCIIJt-1 0U.4RJN(,.1I;Ii J .4~ 12.5"x' 1 t U t 1J~}t1~i1 C'4 6")IJf31i ifd 6. il'i 27. ,I f 7.41 .00 Il"'.to `1 11~ J 0 DOLTZ 6e NUTS 1 0 1 J`I1 if_::i? 111 C: 0.00 15'0.00 1 fl, cl 1, ( 6001 f_'r 1: R I VK SHAFT ASST 1 0 1 121'J621, ,4'? E; IT ).g 7! ~Or': ' 52 .7-, 4 U ~+1 'AR1 CI..>)HP )i'c;I''Li~4Y 1 . 1 7 0.1'cI ~ . y';. 1 0 1 1 Ci75s 1 UNT 0. 1::4+ 0. 1 1 0. 11 TW,~raK~ FQYC JR 8 U5.1 r1 s SHIP DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT AMOUNT VIA 13 1 00 I•J~.IJ•iil~?~r~1l3L.E :?U 51.:~~ 1'1 . C1 U O,C1C= x w avto CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMRY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: October 16, 1984 COUNCIL AGEPOA ITEM N; Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Purchase Order 065263 J,S, EQUIPMENT SERVICE, INC. SUMMARY: This Purchase Order is for the emergency re air of our equipment numbers 2600 and 2490 at the Landfill operation of Solid Waste. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS; Budget RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this Purchase Order #65263 to J. S, Equipment, Inc. for the amount of $6,320,97 be approved for the emergency repairs of our number 2500 and 2490. EXHIBITS: Purchase Order Copy In v?ice;Copies 11 SUBMITTED BY; t ~11~2L doh Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent 66• ;`lr1Fti1 915 6. M1010NNt>E1f ST, ~ own WNTON, TX NAM =P. UMBP DA'f1~ INDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYPI i 10l0J'eU4 GANAGe s `VENDOR; JJJ59500 , SHIP TO J. t; eo0jPMFNT Co. 602 WILAAAFF POKWAY GRANO PRAI RI F s TX ?iAbO ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOW )1 710 Un4 OWJ0 0710 1 604600 R/R OUCKFT ASSY $9986.54 )2 710 004 0690 6710 1 #2490 REPAIR IWO SYSTEM 334043 MMTN TUTAL POR P.O. 5.:320.97 The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House 9111 No. 20. Reference P.O, Number on all K Shipments and Invoices. Shipments are ROA City of Denton, or as Indicated. Send Invoices TO: Divot All kpukkM TO: City of Oenton, Aocounta Payable John J. Marshall, C,P.M. Putchasing Agent 216 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M, Asst, Purchasima Agent Phone 81716886223 81716888311 DIFW Metro 2674M The City of Denton Is an equal opporlunlty employer % ki a rkwo Grand Prairie, Toxas?Soso 2141262.0211 or 262.0212 (;i.ty of Donton Involao No, 1770 11011 Toxar, li . pals: -~',,f34 Donton, Toxeir, 76201 Et9 8ansl hto, a. Authwksd by c~,q 7 1110 8760, 2500 .i G .?6 oaarlp~bnt ! 73 RamoVa and replace hold on c inr edr) and corr ()r bifr Rettlovo and ropla(m bucket r,kJ.d RO a it 10WOr bucket pin bda, em R01AA00 cut~ittr; 006,e teeth ador)Lorr' rind teath Fnbr.tcato and wold 12" spill laloto on back of 1h(1cltot Install new lnr0111.11l;r, and senbi Ili lower londor frruno p.l.n locaUons R and l exchange ningle fango tr7ck 1,011or P qlax artC' i~ 3 x 269.94 Wile Labor 175.5 lim. irg. shop wold:ing) 2,1111.00 ~1U.5 hrs. rog. fold timo) 3:L5.00 Hilago,56 miles} 33.6U T0111AL A1Y90UNT 1)u1i: LlLt i! 5M6.1511 NOTICE: Invoices are payable within 30 days, There will be a 1'A % interest charge added to past due Invoices. RR 1 I d 9 squ4 mo of leaks Inc. 2 ildtife PKrkwity Grand Pr&Ule, Texas 7505n 2141262.0211 or 262.0212 /I M .S 7~L (;J.ty Of Doutoll Invoice No, .1.91.0 l1AodM W&I No. AWhorIM By rAM Cat W? 1. is 5 21 90 In :l' 652.6,3 DOWIP11mt W0 o - ws ReseAl 1rydraul3.c tilt svdv0:i Ropla'00 water temperature gu~tro J,abor (7 5 hrrl, rog. field tznte) Parts 70 • i13 Tux 3401'1 L 1110 AL AMOU1,11' Dui; X31{.~t3 R ~ R NOTICE; Invoices are payable within 30 days. There will be a 1 %a% Interest charge added to past due Invoices. i co~ , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA aACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET M8ETING UATk, October 16, 1984 SU4JECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of Dallas Drive Mini-Storag~j'Addition SUMMARY: This is a troat of 3.71 acres situated on the soutt:west corner of Teasley Lane and Dallas or. Tne site is within a commercial zone and mini- Warehouse development is anticipated. This site is adequately served with water and sewer lines, but the general drainage system will need up- grading. Access to the property will be based on provisions contained in the Denton Subdivi- sion and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of preliminary plat RECUMMENUATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recpmmends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. Route local drainage through driveway to Dallas Drive or obtain a 20 foot easement. 2. The use of the plat is limited to mini- warehouse in view of full capacity of the sewer line along Duncan street. The number of toilets is limited to three. 3. One driveway will be allowed on Dallas Drive. ALTERNATIVES: Approval of preliminary plat with or without conditions ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat 4A: V , C4.,7 A._.k' Harry Persaud Development Review planner r ~ if R f F titlt \ \ \ r I A o\ \ wtrwrr w . Yito•M . wort M si ertrekr& t•r `a, .rut ie ewrwuy~'y; + LdT I BLOCK I r 9 5.71 Ac. 1 ((WME'R C+AL toNf i + Xle i F'v \ jl ~ ~riN'IMlWAl1Y /UT I BALLAS ooNc mom S701U4r AD iw4 raid ,r r.•t tfrr pWrtsr ~ ~ p;I re ~rt ~t N LOT I t0 way i " , ~+tt%?i• % p CITY 4 MOM 44 OdtfON, TV, 'r. i ' 1r/ 1 V ` b b ~ bt y I ~p VIYyiG r[tr + V 46 + oftLoadmav N) K t o• rr•ti Vin` OMLIM NOW MRW 1ri7AYt AN11rdU t JACK VILL PNOM i A[.Y.' MULL r CIM tOM „ ~ N, n " n ~Ml Hr rw~ r~I AW mo ~Kwont.an•r 'A"'0 t'•!,t S '!'-Sw1 7Ij ~;'i'T rr, n=om J.n;..n-ref- t ' 7e' oZ ' (I`i'Y COUNCIL AUkNUA ' BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEEP Mk;kTINU DATEt October 16, 1984 SUBJEM Approval of the preliminary and final re plat of thhe Milton Court Addition, lot 1, block ;1 SUMMARYt This is a tract of 0,4 acres of land situated east of and abutting Normal Street and north of West Oak Street. The site is adequately served with water and sewer facilities, Electrio service is avail- able. Access is to be allowed on Normal St. All existing etreets meet City requirements. The site is xonod for multi-tamily (MF-l) and a 17 unit efficiency development is anticipated. ACTION REQUIREUi Approval of the preliminary and final repa.at RECOMMENUATIONs TJ1e Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary and final replat. ALTERNATIVOs Approval of the preliminary and final replat ATTACHMNNTs Reduced plat Harry 1,Persaud Development Review Planner 1 I 1 NI "444 loo. "I too I~ tO1M0 Mt- 1 .MIeI ee.lYlee I1.1e w1 04 40 l! r wee.. "Al! 1•-10' e4 ItICAt10N MAP ~ Ii1 nln Uxf l MI11 lelr / ...~~~._.....-.~...e. 1. 4i INiNn 4 r0T 1, LOCK 1I M,LTO COUR 0.4 ACR ! 1N 1Nt city ANb C. "IV t lest llwn lel ll.l- 2tlN1 0 AIf - I J; ilnu •weelel e►ON w 61 *IN" . 10 ~ ~ 1J t.PUCNAilRIlURVC fONlb 4M- I • Cr AeI tRAGf NO. ! J wW MG IeO-Yfl lel: I~ • e,f 11.1 *NYI ~ 11 0-06 i u e.f. 1 i►Rf[IYINARY Rf►lAt is, r r A I., f BURKE EN(31Hr`•ERINGt Y t 11 i,. s 6Y•IS' DU" W r/ 16' . . ,~1 p.ul , ' -J. .,f 1_L. ' • Ia4. pull. 11.11 rl II 1' Ip•;"II• 1111II I bkl Srll'1 p1' A."tI at '1 Dl1 D 11, ~I _ _ VnMLtT 111111 IN IAu cl ly ul Vlrhl 1',u0-m I Mills, ITllq, Jnn L',ine r I~~ .Ii1 Ihi• 11'arl Ar9 •rlliod In 111 n, r,,,a u,V,l. Nvil,IIiol Im. u' V Il V Imhlttl fl q lur, m n •..1 p., ,,fime lull 1,, •v ASJ of the -1 prr.,l NI!.III PV 'it h,.nlrnl C4nn1%. rl.ln, Ib. 11A I,ICI IrWit I•,IP Q 091'IIr111Jr1Y •li'nrr that' ab In 11 u'.n' u ' ~ IIf01VV IVI, Ina Uu• 9u1111Yael 4'u 1f1u 1' "I the IIAII In.Ink .1Uq,'.1 IheV he'. 1 JI it IIIm Ir,1 fn11AA ,11 Ihp Inlll 9l, 11•... nl 1! I Y, 11L 11 a ul aA.al i Oak Illy.`, Milt Iho 11,141 Ihll ul 4ulnaE R11 r.41 016YCI' Yur 111 sl 1h Ihu 1'941 Ilun nl ,Ill n.N .41I lit 1, aN eI II `IIt -it III aM1 n1 1'19,11 I, ,I .UI II 1 I JI Ilu 4111.- 1 ,arnef 'I. I I'll ! Ihr Na 4 N 4 I I Iglr •w 11 I 0 TII IYCE VUI'Ih All itlklllb In VlI l n VIM Ihl• 1u.lh thil n1 the ald Marl I lio L1n.lA AVIV1 11-1 A-I IOther 111 11,,1111 119N 101 innu.l mat a 1 AA Pu 1Jn 14♦ (All Ja piu,l PANI 1141 If Ihl• 1, 111 a I, 11111,1 a1 .".1 f '.OA, 1 11.1.1 I,1 a M11111 hl Nro- q'p.11'Irt V. 111, IIm It, 'O 2. 1NISI'1: VwIll, All 0a0I es it VUIii.q 11 N...IU 11 ar.11 .I N, Ii.r YI,1 Ih / r V II 'It nl kr11 UIt.. Sir ci a 11,.( 11, 1 ,d A1 1 qa Ip lh.. N1+1 111 P L 0 T YIL INiIY Yav III1',IVVI G and I", I w 111 l'JI .1 it a,. ..I I.r f P P 3 9 L 0 V K I fV .J t s. p W 1 `;i;a, INI111'l I1N}, kYn9 11.1 -It x 111 III I.YI !'!11\1'41::. u n 0 391 AE V r IIIt9 '1Nq IYfIU51111 }'S, IVI',I u,ru I,1 11 +nipl Ihls Plal .'i41Jaa'1'1~ u 'p r the bar Ir1 ,1r1•+'lht.1 lu1'1+ qq VII 11,4 l it iu+f 1 om a: I th the ~/O !'lll'.If f +1 n OPIIIrU 1'1111111 7 fJ .w1 1.Ia Ya 1. 'I!'a 1, +,i 1.' l O v~L~ p O 114' pllhll Lr fal'rYOI' Hrt 41,1 I I~.L In it „ 1111 .aal• INN) a Trills dual Arum, y. • N 7 x. 1 ~ ~ l~ 1'N'J I4 bi'3TN 11'.9, 11'1', Ic J yO 1 04 STt II'. UI rr, V ('UIN TI' nl' nIV I11Y d~ r1T1'UNi' 1p III,, 1nl... lef` Yul Jla 11111, 1 a !a, .JiJ 1IV II♦ J" Sim, on Ills rn p I'. (1111I1' IpplJ N t/ LI J A L S K 1 knoyn to .r lu ne II r D.1 NUn yl uu 1• la t.a rlt~el I the III, A . S U R V E Y I A- 99 O' 90 1,1114. In%I'1Mm11. u I al x161, 1, Cad 1 ',I IL. ell ula, 11:. Ina Our, pu+11o41I :In' raub 1.44-.1 r I I.. r, Ir. 1 r,....• and lu L.. ' Jpa1IIII till 1 11 1111,11 '11 VI's 1'VI11'A 41 NMI yob dll ul' 1ql lrr 1U1. .Ip ul 1911, pl 9 9`17 16"w 65.10' a OAK 6MIa ran0c, )am wi STREET r11 1,AN'S I'1'NI f I IC l Fl. t1"', 111 MY IIY TI411AL NNI'!IIi it Y~ IJllt it It It V, c0 L4: Y6S,.AeA IN 11•rrn 1SIhl Ir _ _ f ISLttI 1!i, du it cerlIfY INA1 lbH Pl ll yJN MILTON COURT, 1ln "'W', rlIren an actual al a,, 111.16. .w'.,%' III t Lr.1 0, 8. r r' I L' and Ihal the eonunl tl to glp,N' I.1,•I,n Lit I I d L J C K irt ,11. 1r r IJ n'I m' attrar 1nn"nr III U1 dlrol 11 n1d C I T Y 0 F DEN T 0 IN ~1tp1'll'I~Il Ih 4lio , exa, Ihr Ih leaurow hr i I v or 11 4 6 1 11 1 T ' D E N T O N COUNTY, T E X A S u. Nta 91 _ M A 11 INDUS T41e Sf Iii S 61y1 It II 141 PANIC 19 Yllli lh ll,~rnlunln, p,p,S, tin', 10111 I%~i~ ..._DA Aeq 91 aqo Cott Y411 A A$$O CIR h fta It I` Ip 1 SUNYFYINO at '60h% , 0 U BOA 6!i 0114 1 ON. TE A A S 7i; bae y4 nu !{Sfl 1 61)• 5G5~8215 l a I T `177 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JACK-UP JIMMY RANT N811TING1 DATE: October 16, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of preliminary replat of sun Valley Addition, Block A, Lot 13 SUMMARY: The preliminary replat is for a tract of 0,655 acres of lend situated south of and abutting Hercules Lane and test of Stuart Road, The site is Within the existing general retail district and a day care canter development is anticipated. There is need tot a sidewalk along Hircules tune, and water and sexrer linen must be extended in accordance with the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulatiobs. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of preliminary replat RECOMMENDATION: The planning and zoning Commisuion recommends approval of the preliminary replat. ALTERNATIVE: Approval of preliminary replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat Harry Persaud Development Review Planner 0316f y' ,,,J <NARCLOf r,14wM AM l1RIf 10110 A00x 1- '""fir-'~[!P?L~! t1AU oA n1Aa A eMNn m ahlo« I 1 W r ~M~-.. YMarAS. W L.v. fl AM ANA ar[ CIAkt, Akt IN% MNI. L. nt 4 0.IN0 ai l a J 0 AIR 11K1 UI 141 14.1. L 1.11.4. (10WAA art rrr, 4WIA11 . IM, H Alit AND tot'klt ul NIiNk, IL Ak, Atli Illm parl id {10tt. A DI 120' RJR TOO ION VAULT AODItfto, Iua lIt110N, M nA ti If 01 Fl I full, AS IIIAN it iW 1LAt 1ILIR0te to "Jim A, t*,l lit, ILAI 60 momm" M 14AIM COrNn, t"Aa, AND oil*. "L pulick,A l DILCUPW NA /OL"ll k ►IA INItK1 AT toll NOIT*tl1 CMM11 OF $A10 41 A,%. INMt At IS nNNe S , , It INC Tit. ROltNI tO "I of Lot 1, 11.'ki 1 01 dr "to t1i ,r t x ly. - AN It 1011 rtt"pw IN cal"I n, rat. 11; KIt IK14p/ At NHIw N„LIN 6moo% R040 fool"' 11tH. Mi lot W0N AI('N1•IN YAM Of ININIa I.A?t{ 44' M f_111Y1 I. T1r1 Ml4 K4tp W 141lNttl :t NIM'It1 1o ItII.NR IAtt wl%4 1141 OW14Ltl N16Nt•Of-1'AY A D111ANtt of 10.16 flrl 1, M too, fl,,, r I iNINt'I. INR-ty OV M0ltt{ Ol 41k"f% 00 uroli" toll A MA1011, p1 t^~• ,-rl~-•-t----f• ItA,11 fV.l 110 M' IM9 rl% VN ip/ N,MIN 0:T 11 114. M AI [pJ 4►Rl L 1 111.1tvl TPINtf K1kti oltdt1S 1% YIA Vi Lc M SWAPO nar, At" lath I1 AI LIt It4'MAtI LIM! ANSI A11l1 of Ill. IL 1111 t„ ka If•♦ .la AI r- - I + I I I { I I t m imtki oll SOIL" ftNNll M tA10 ANtLS 01,111041 00 Ne11f1 M x1Mglf 07 01 s Si "4INI W ltrl r 0,Ir1AV,l CI 1111...116 "IN TN { 1141 i0 IW. M1N1 1111 611;11,01.4, li ottlalk CON[ At NLA Of %jAm" T ~J lAAN4 It:'Kt, ff! LO I ' I kv lilltlc Nt LMA' lWast "IN IY Tom ncskwlf•. LOT I BLOCK 1 ° 11NY.A 040", 1,0 11141, of. t,4, CI.AAp Air IO1 tuft, Mt Wab .+X11 h 1. 1LrU E3l 0C K A. i Wflckciv, lilt NLlllk at "Amp PAL-pion ka w I Oil If rr A nl JONES AODI 114111 UN VAyLEY 11001 fI0N [NI SON YALLl1 UVOITIOk to Tit 11n U S~I1 ! Mahn. •v Aa, o,• a. 046 50 F(~ SWIM, Sleek A NLIfu Otelufl It, tpA n'n lI of roam, u, n n `0f :1 ;t $J;1 '!ALLEY Af01 t10N W. X4/01. 2,Oq iso pR tAAUer At1 vRVN ntaM. ntsl secho", 810t1. A -6466- rRMJt[0 ~ ' R[il11 Cdb 0{ DO IS Pq ar CA" r-m: Wills, . , .4i RLN.OIolO 4 JAIL O "Atl of N1AS At i COLNir OT DeNtrN A Jl._. 1 I OVMt N[ /'Nf. ONp1111f.Ntp VOIAIf Iv 1r 114 14 a110 N :p 2 I pl StAtt Ok INIS OAt filltO'11LLY ApflAtt ARf 1,4 u Iv aIII tt.ARA AN" to Ht IO It toll 1[ettrtl I Wwk" off C; 1W L -I = r tM /Mrr /oo Ik RC Ii}tALMtkt, A" Mt!kvImcu Mti Iwt; Ali [I4CUtto hR SMI Mf fill WItMst Alto tCNSIiN1.It"P fll., I 1 J tLMta310, AND IN At CAPRI r tNl'1<Ipl 01v[N IrMty Nt NANO 01, SIAI Ill afoul mo, In I TAA ALLEY I 14? I'V-6 FiTtM IVIII,fC"i i'iNti Ilit'ofNiri,: 'PIid.If, svootrON'L tLltltlu Tl. II g 9 k" THOU 1x11 1Y Will IFEW" 5t 1 I tNAI. G CANT Y. NtMKt11 01:11itl Lo 111'tltn>AA: Allu• , •r ALVIMI COP[LANO,f11 , ORII 1 000CN11,111 DfNIOf NV Y tL1rt[v,/N Limit CLINCtN, III Nthf Ar CIm" INAI I r#1'AALA IRIS IIAT Ip+. r•. A+t•AI Av, ActWNAp S"off 01 fNI LANG. AND THAT fit JO'k Ilk, Soli, lallf' a YtRI. ILAt Lh AMMO NI FA,WFAL SD It1YISIM Iv MF'Y MKI •LrY 11x1 SUf! VALLEY 400111011, fh Sl $OttiM F 0101NAIIAIk Of lot [In fI 61.Spo, BLOCK A NIA y, r YAP Nti tit 0 ik50 ACA[ IN fut (it, e cuur,ll n, MINION, It 1L(11 FOAL ACIAIL Os[ OMNCN LM CLANK 60k 4 110C,A, 1t 16711 - .,n'rt •A„a, T --j I -T CITY COUNCIL AGNNUA HACK-UP SUMMAkY SHEET ftET1NG DATE: October 16, x,984 SU9JECT: Approval of preliminary plat of Southridge III SUMMARY: This is a tract of 59.U29 acres situated south of 1.35E and straddling both sides of the Lillian Miller Parkway, north of Teasley Lane. The use of land within the site has been approved under planned d' eve'lopment district (PU). Block 1V containing approximately 17.6 acres abutting Lillian Miller Parkway is to be developed as a private enclave. All of the streets in this single family detached zone will remain private with only one access to Lillian Miller Parkway, There is need for a 12" diameter water line along the frontage of the property on Lillian Milder Parkway., In respect of existing sewer capacaity, the utility department is of the view that a 21" diameter sanitary sewer line is needed along the southern boundary of the prop- erty, E1e-etria and telephone facilities are available. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission reoommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. Detention to the north has to be further resolved; 2. Actress to McNeill tract to be given Further consideration;. 31 Block 5 to be approved as one lot subdivision; 4. Preliminary plat should be corrected to snow balance of offsite sewer lines required to adequately serve phac•e II and Phase 111. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approval or denial of the preliminary plat 2. Approvalof preliminary pidt subject to conditions ATTACHMENT. Reduced preliminary plat N. ' a4,.-k Barry N. Persaud Development Review Planner 0333] DATArmLr ,rR la a \ w r re ~ 1!O 1 Y ~ ■TrlellrN PN .MII10h +Lwe»te~ie nYi !}r~ti+l•. t v vtV10 k1Y1~~11 YMwrr. .1 %t q LOt l ' K W,* lOt 1' NJU11'itld~jO ll~f XA 001, r~ se" - ]lr } • CI ' r h, t r t ~•r EI • `Pty ~r ~ / r 1. ~___a,-n.~ ~ ~ rr ~ •K / ;`~,,1. J } ~ _ ~ If p ' ♦ lOr 1 CLmiq 1 f u~ir \I r 1 a.~ ` ~'~J j ~ f 1 r\ r r r ` i~rl. ?yH ,ett , ~t r n r 1 ~ - ~ r r 1 `i 1 t/ t E <r I ,r,rrl II\ l • ~ i, 12210, i 1 ; . / •yw„r .r.`• r. i i. ~ i7 ~'f A l n n .e I r. r. t. of rl' ~ .w. r... ~ . -•.i.~ ♦ r / ,1- d5i,:• % SOVIHIIIDGt SICTI'vy m • BLOCK! I,I, r_r. 1, b le, / >.ur~4mu OY ..aaa 1': ctf' rr.;. 1.r.. lii• rr j. McNrr. Mdl I w .a~~~ .la,t a t rr. ,ri CITY COUNCIL, AGENDAr BACK-U ,,SUMMARY S EE MEETING DATES October 160 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of the Guy Laney Addition SUMMARYs The owner' has acquired.i~OditAonal property adjoi,nir; , ye recently apyr,.-wed auto dealership on Ural Drive. The purpose of the replat is to 6;iminate existing lot lines and create a one lot resiubdivision. ACTIO14 REQUIREDs Approval of the final repiat RECOMMENDATION: The planning:and Zoning commission recommends approval of the final replato ALTERNATIWs Approval of the final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced Plat David Ellison Senior planner i W//1 M 1~1/ tl lftlw, 1 OI 4 1~ M ltl M A /1Il 4m am to 4 Now An "a" VAIN 1, 0 14 1 1Y /Otl11i~ 1 [,IN yy [0011 , to e, All W M }~11MMyM y~[ M 1 WMtlY MIMII 1111, MM out t told elf Y (WM1 M11~.IM 11M 1101001111 "$"1 M WIfIM At tnl 111/ p~ tellll O l I, I Mu an lloq Wltl" M I~) NMY IKM~a/~W1 61 MAU LLY 041", " t O11t/ Mw u 1.Piy y411 wIM1t1 0 wt vivo a" IIfLY PiI 1"Yt~NM" 1 attwt 01 111.1{ wl to a [Ml lul 1 "0 th ti N["q f[ Il00'Hf 04 {Ito"/ Y{11 1 011SAtl " a 0 lto tat to Ir 1M11 NU PALICt IJIt1111 Otllu 4111w'nl 4111:O0016 vat %Illttltl 0 N = i64.11 wt to w IW toll 1"rl N it" it No No Will" IO too m 10 1"A Ilft 1 ul g '1 .,P VM1I 00 I"t lu JI no A*" a.f}.,vrN H Nit Mrlan HOY.f {I•Ii Qt irrl Wtt II OWU ti O&VII ]1 utv.Il rile wort uit }Y A1. IlfwOn IkMl 11.1 11in•"•r11 A 0111wi ul 10.6 0"1 k w Iw Plot tollG "An " at "is a Alp" 01 11001" rat rtm uIP M~ 1 1140.44•1Af 1 alt"" 01 10.01 tut u M I"t III, 1~~ x 11 0 t?tit 6 Y 160 a[,Atwnf it IffNN[ will .011}tw'1 N LOT A \ f"Wi 1100" If 06MM 1{ AIKVII 01 M"N Lul t butt t to III.{0 out t/ w Pilot of molmom w t'00111aw t. I'll WWI BLOCK I 6fI"`I' 3 rrsz'arw 17! 10' \ wr Irunu A1r elrttl 111 n Milt It"I"ll 60731 ACRES out, I. at I. tam, tl ru" won flit Ulut eH:aatitl to& ""IN WWII" ri"un a lot a. 6wt 1, yr m M l tl,a wttid/ t0 no. ton of PIN". "111. U0 M Out, IA f10t0An Pi too N"1t at MUM, I,, 110111 trl u.Irleit I1Y11/ rtta.. ' f1 1 lutt 00 room ,I t :a'1n of $90" u "1"t All. tot Ir ilil-M A,,tIH IOAttt Ir N6 M al0 A'1 "Aft" rill Itf /11/.wuti AOWYtl n'1 x, WO, t.wM n II No " m "uio NWl It1( II S'w ,m IJ M Nb&",f. l"f11 sti. ANN Kp1111b[" io" tot"utlln0 Ir I.1n M el lCpll. INC, !N W Jl l w t l" it4o M IR IJ wf{W, .IPI Ir w [APJttn f.Wll, ,Iw t11Pit w 11101 w aa. of 4"AA n1I la, at J h Sp'72'i{•~ A lriri ~fETI'ar'i"' wr"`twFri N! Ip~' wwHa~/ areatnn toot MU W It too" lu"nlt 104 ti.Iq.!# 0, M 16#0 . ` OW(A OUP of LAlt(1 Itlt~ 1. CYf V. , -I . WI9"1Y f/aW IO11Y "IrrtU. " 00 lox 3010# fvrw anon Ir1 1 f/wl•) 1110 Put t a k1w r "=*M .rr/4 a W u1. IW not t" 4w fir f n~ o(Iti01+, to ri201 ""III" 0 Aty ttw fit l W[/ fu0n wW Mt }au1Y y 1, ♦ s" Lumm " ftl tin w ""M. &45 ` mrr,-ulw+r,°I:~xnrm o. el[a1 . ~ -C..'~.---.. e•" s st'"r.w NAM Ailsltase ff RE. PLAT et AAITT A No INC1 Repltl of 4UY LANEY ADDITION, Lot IA, Oak 1 w 1 isl#1 CO11tIZLT1I0 btlMlt~M lIMNIIYtlII! k HOPKINS SURVEY AS. 16*4 r 1 /Are e[vnlels wn t I COOTY. TEXAS 3,i wrc y. , p5^ aw r zaw n~ ~nao%TT2a # e e -77 ' ~..4f CITY CUUNCIL AGOUA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DAWs October 160 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Hartman Acres Addition SUMMARY: The preliminary plat is for a tract of 1,0345 acres situated north of and abutting Willowwood Street, east of Kendolph Street, and west of McCormick Street and more fully described as lot, It block 1, on Tompkins Survey, Abstract #1246, Denton, The site is.Wlthin a single family residential zone W- 7) 444 ths'purpose of tha plat is to 6110"w for a single family development. The preliminary plat conforms to the requirements of'the Denton' Subdivision and Land Development Regulations with'the exception of perimeter street paving,and water Facilities. The'Plan- nthg and Zoning Commission waived the require- ments for perimeter street paving at its meeting of Uctober 10, 1954. ACIVIUN REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat subject to condition RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the condition that water lines along the frontage of the property on Willowwood Street be upgraded to a minimum of 6 inches internal diameter. ALTERNATIV'EC: 1. Approval of the' preliminary, plat with or without condition 2. Denial of preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat Harry No Persaud Development Review Planner t w 1 • N'KLWA MCMRM41bl NO~MIL N`OMNO'fO1.M f ~ a11! rrl.w lr.r iw»r era vN f,r~f~io « aw ya , r fr J t t 10349 ACM, ILOCK OAS' A is•»M IalIO SY~7 ~'r w- f i c rr flfls, M ~ ~ f.t•fo !MM lI•r Y 1`~ M M •w, s I V...wy Wi IPA6 HAMMETT 8 NA$M, INC. ~wuro»f fr C14D 9*4 9 II M OOfi9lkrm ENdfRERS B 9UIlYE1CR3 PENMN• tCKA$ rk'o 000 HARTMAN ` AGES .41, b1 'I~N ILII~, -A -71 1, Cl 61DA M0, n+xA# MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $66.8200 M E M O R A N D U M DA'Z'E; October 11, 1984 TO; Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM; Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT** Request of Miller Distributing to Paint Retaining Wall on Bonnie Brae Representatives from Miller Brewing have, approached the City about having one of their service organizations repaint the retaining wall on the east side of Bonnie Brae just south of gori.pture Street. They proposed to paint a ottyscape with the name Denton Texas on it, They have contacted all of the residents along Bonnie Brae. Included in your packet is a petition signed by all of them in favor of this project. In the past the staff has had to repaint several sections of the wall due to inappropriate graffiti being written on it. We think that this project might cut down on this writing since the whole wall would be painted by the Miller service, group. The attorney has advised that any activity in the rtght~of-way would have to be approved by tae Council. Therefore we have placed it on their agenda for their review and approval. If you have any questions, we would be happy to try and answer them at the meeting. B a ve Assistant City Manager js 1952M i l-1'f~TV I F7 rmi m'•ri..~+..y n-r. -r.'^r'.. ^,^.T°. ""N'^'T°.. i e MILLER OF DENTON PETITION ?OR DESIGN ON 'BALL OCTOBER 3, 1984 Was the undersigned, do hereby aprove the proposed painting of the wall on Bonnie Brae and Scripture by the Miller girls of Denton on October 13 and 14 (design attached). NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER 1 ~ r,.,~•1 ~'~.5~~ ~1 r3~1-~~S -.~f z-f ti~ , ~jf.'l? 1? ~ F (?j~l~ ~c~"~ rj ~~~1.' 31 24 30 4.6 64 / .ti • I.`///~ ~J}mac. 70 84 \.:I1\,..:~.. i ~t::f ''~~•l. L.L.. I. ~./1,.4. 'l 12 S6t "2J r~ 14, 041) 16 17. 18. 19. 1 n • 2421 1.36 Z North, 6smon, Toxa@ MM (eta 6e6 d71>• °;'q't +~~~,•"r + ~aF ~,x^4 ~t r e. s .e r.~e .d'.n~'R~S 'ti r ; i ,ti? t 57 PLANNING AND ZONI$G COk,M1SSiON RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Tot Denton City Coancil Case No.s Z-1684 Meeting Date: October 16, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: W.S. Nash 223 W. Hickory Denton, TX 76201 Status of Applicants Owner's representative Requested Actions Change in s0ning frbm the agricui- t:Qt*l (A) 2'6ning district tb they planned development'(PD) p1josifi- cation. If approved, the planned development will permit the oonstruc- tion of a 198 lot mobile home subdi- vision. Location and Size: A 44.1 acre tract located on the east side` of F,M. 2164 (North Locust Street) approximately 5600 feet north of Hercules Street Surrounding Land Use and zonings North - Vacant] A South Vacant; A East - Twin 'Lakes Mobile Home Park= not in city limits West - Vacant; A Denton Levelopment Guides Area is designated as low intensity. R y}a ~~I' •1 ICY Yfp li j ~1 v 1~' ''n d"Ci~'(1 I, t . 1 i (t i (Case 8 Z"1664) Page two SPECIAL INFORMATION Dra#nage: Drainage is a significant consider- ation at this site. The proposed site plan shows a floodway easement through the park. As always, the drainage issue will be handled during the platting stage of development. Transportation: Access to the park will be from F.M. 2164 (North Locust Street). This road is already overloaded and the proposed land use would seem to aggravate this situation, uti'iities= The closest existing water line is located at the intersection of Her- cules and Locust, approx'imatel.y 6000 feet away from this site. An exist- ing sewer lift station at adla6ant Twin Takes Mobile Home Park s.prob- ably not sufficient to serve this ?'-Sroject as well. The developer must i nance all costs for necessary facil- ities. Electric service will be provided by the Denton County Electric Cooperative. Gas and phone service are available to the site. ANALYSTS This site is located in a low intensity area. Recently adopted standards for mobile home parks in low intensity areas include the following: 1. The overall intensity standard should not be violated. Due to the large amount of undeveloped property in the area, this proposal will not violate the overall intensity standard. 2. No concentration should be more than 200 units. This proposal in itself contains 198 units, however, the adjacent Twin Lakes Mobile Home park contains approxi- mately 320 uni,},s. The total number of units in the proposal and the existing park would significantly exceed Lhe 200 unit concentration limit. { ~J 1 page `three ANALYSIS (Continued) 3. Access by'a collector street or larger.- Access to this site will be from f'.M. 2164 (N. Locust Street), a primary major arterial. 4. Strict site glen control within 1600' of existing single. family,, residential development. This request 'ia a planned development which does permit site plan control. The developer has proposed a 5' living screen around the perimeter of the site. 5. Sufficieht.green space, recreation facilities, etc, pro- vided. The developer has reserved 4.6 acres of the 'site 'for a reareation'area but a specific list o£ as onities' for the area has not been provided. 6, input into planning by neighborhood, No formal neighborhood association oxists in this area and as always, it is diffi- cult`to ascertain the amount of 'input solicitied from property owners in the area. RECOMMENDATION This is a proposal for a mobile home subdivision. The proposal complies with the, standards in the current Mobile Home Park Ordinance. The proposed lot size of 5000 square feet is consistent with mobile home park standards. Streets and utilities for the project must meet Subdivision Regulation standards. Since the proposal violates the 200 unit concen- tration limit in a low intensity area, the Planning and Zoning Commiss'ioti recommends denial of Z-1684 by a vote of 7-0. If the City Council is inclined to grant this request, the following conditions are recommended for this development: 1. A five (5) foot living screen will be installed and main- tained around the perimeter of the property. Single family (SP-7) standards will be applied with the exception of lot size. I i i F777"77". r 4 (Case 0 Z-1684) C ti g F ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve peti~tiOn aith 44dikionel.dohditions 2. Approve petition'without donations 3. Approve the ppetition with conditions 4. Deny the petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Pl. tined Developiaent Site Plain 3. RRply Form Totals- 4 . Property.'Owner1i9t . 54 Minutes'of Plannifig and zoning iaesting of September 12, 1984 0817a e x r. r 0 a ,lSt .R. ~a C , el t c a • • Y P * ' aux.} Tit T' •r - w' ° > ~ f w v • i1 I A. y Y '16 f (t 91 Y T^ ~!t y }lint N ~ I I, 11 ~ ~ ,U\~.1<. wI M11~.~r 13 )111.'•76 Ii.1!'IP.t ~y~,`.:~ 11.7')7.1 I ILI, i tfl.~lef 1 t 1A I , 1 yr ' y I 1 1 At' ~ . 1.-• . - • J I k JI t. r• u ,F , 5' 1K,X' 1 _ {II I _ . _ .W _ 11 .J I _ _ .i r.: l.r;C '.l Y, . i,i 'z..1 ~'6.1 "A:,, SS. I-, .l-_. L~ ~ ....~t;1 ri. .l,t ;%3 !']STN (~.'•t..;`: If I. .O . / ; " 'J. n, .J.~.__ ~r.._•. ; ~ Wit[ C. ri' T /9r ^ •S 14'ak• O a1 C1'. 1 I. I ~ I [ ~ ~ .sii'rlr. -1r1~~ St DS1' _ af~'11x'ti[ .rp71 T+rra.GF P 1 ..vim .nry•n l+ T' f / Y: n" 11-1777,77 37 0.` PitaPim" OWE;. ►LY o CITY 1i(iIL IN FAVOR IN MOSITION UNDECIDED Won* Received, k6he Received *744 L -1~8 74'(x' ~~+.,.W'' We 1 Judol (Al I. el I 1 10 </b0 .C.h~.. r~S' 'iT^'r'.^'°'RiT, ^'i1p y, t P Z Minutes September 12, 19$4 Page 4 a1 r- This is the petition offit. 4, Nash regiAsott,a in eot►in:. ft'oo the a riaultux'Al (A) ala~osifio ion aa- l.fia Lion on a 44.1 to the pl'a lned development (?D) i~rr wore tract located on the east s de of N X16.4 (North Locust Street) 4pproxiliately $~,b00 f"i t t'6 th of Hercules Street, The treat is more particularly 'described as immediately adjacent and west of Twin Lakes Mobile Home Park, If approved, the pVanned;d,evel`opment will permit the construction 'of a 198 lot mobile home subdivision. Ms. Spivey stated there were b reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 feet of subject property; 1 was returned in opposition and zero in favor. On question from Mr. Duren, Mr. Clark poi4ted out the alignment of sell Avenue in relation to this property. Mr, Burton, W. Slackwpil statod he .is the owner of :the property and he bougght it',wfeh'th+ intent to develop it, as there is a need in Benton for't,is type of deielop- ment, He stated' he is proposing 196 sites for nahu- factored homes for sale inetea" of reint. He stated he is willing to pay for water'extend.ion from Hercules Street. Ho stated the property is located adjacent to Twin Lakes Mobile Home park, which is isolated (300 'families) at the and of Stuart Road. He `stated 'he is willing to make a public street from North Locust to the Twin Lakes park. On question from Mr, Claiborne, Mr. Blackwell stated the lot sizes will be 5,000 square feet minimum. He stated Twin Lakes has 320 pads and he is proposing 198. On uestion from Mr, J'uren, Mr. Blackwell stated no, this wan t be rent property, but property for sale and will comply witti city standards. On question from Mr. gidor, Mr. Blackwell stated this is a subdivision. Mr. Bill Nash stated he was representing Mr. Blackwell as a consulting engineer and stated the new extension of Loop 288 will pass just south of'this property which will provide additional access to this area. John Overstreet stated he lives 1,600 feet 'north of`this pro osed area, He stated the area north of the proposed is e,iin$ developed,on 1,0 acre tracts. He stated the aaoin: to 'the rpropoaed ar*A, is b t~reeis' two ~hiils on Locuat and wouldbe a 06eie tittiy dangerous, ,area, in re- Ate gard to the traffic. Hastated `there' are approx#.tdly one or two :fires per month in this area and'stated there is limited fire protection as well as a limited supply of water. 77 NPI, 77: 77-71" P i~ Z Minutes Septeaber 12, 1984 Page 8 Mr. Juren asked Mr.'4verstroot I f he was aware that this development would bring city water to this area. Mr, Overstreet stated it would not 'serve him as he is 800 feet out side of the city limits. On question from Mr. Meyer, Mr. Overstreet stated no, he does not want to be annexed, He 6tated the only city service he has is garbage pickup. Mr. James Bostick stated he lives directly behind this property; his property adjoins this area, He stated he is afraid of fires in the area as there is no fire protection, Mr. Mayor asked if he lives in' the city. Mr. Bostick stated no he does not, Carl Mank n stated he lives near'Sob Cat Road and the traffic on North Locust is very' heavy especial ly, during rush hours. He stated this development if allowed, would bring in 400 more vehicles. He stated in the past 20 years, there has never been any road improvements to North Locust as far as widening the road. He stated in his opinion, it would conjeat the traffic even more, r.-eNting a dangerous situation. Lon Clay Hill, 1419 Broadway, stated he teaches astronomy at North Texas State University, He stated he sends approximately 900 students to the north missle base for study. He would like to have more areas for clean air, clean lend and clean dark air. He stared in a day when space is a part of our future,, we need this area to do astronomy studies. He stated he would like to keep development in this area to a minimum. Tom Harrison stated he also teaches astronomy at North Texas State University and stated they acquired the missle base to have a nice darkarea to study astronomy. He stated there is $60,000of ppermano'ntly`installed 'equip- ment at this site and the problem he has with this devel- opment is the light polution. He stated this is the only area in north Texas that offers education of astronomy with labs and scopes. He offered several ways to mini- dbize light pollution. He stated he was not speaking directly in opposition to Coupd ity Development or to mobile homea, but fr'oe a ean`point :of an educational purpose. He atatedthey"have .plane to install a new telescope and hire a new teacher by next summer, as per government funds. Ms. Cole arrived at the meeting, 1 r P ra Z Minutes optowmr 12, -1464 Age 6 Mr. Moyer Asked Mr, Harrison if ,this dev l.opsont in particular or any development would 'bother this area. Mr. Harrison stated any type,oi d0velopment would bother this area; mainly the street lighting. Mr. Sidor asked Mr. Harrison if he would be opposed to the mobile home subdivision if the lighting were more efficient. Mr. Harrison stated no he would not. #ob Widm ier stated he has property in Denton and on Bob Cat 'Road. He stated he was in opposition to mobile home parks As they are an eyesore. "e stated Twin Lakes Motile Hoke Park hays over 350 units as .well as ;camper trailers tnd 'tt•*Astiot people, Re stAo*, ;the new sohool, ffiverce Lieirentary, wheq 'dprined will iars- diately ,be fkll. He stated`he;doesn't know of anyone with the exception of Twin Lakes residents who wanta mobile home park next to their property. Louise Hillman `stated she owns propetty'in Anton and her feather has owned property in Denton since 1917. She stated mobile homes Just don't make for a good living. Ms. Farmer stated she owns property between the two missle bases' and built a lovely°.home there S years ago. She stated there are a lot of lovely hoaxes being built there and we certainly don't want a mobile home park there. Ms. Spivey stated this site is located to a tow intensity area. She read the standards recently Adopted for a mobile home park in low intensity areas. She stated this is a proposal for a mobile home subdivision. The propos- al complies-with the `standards in the current Mobile Home Park Ordinance. The proposed lot size of 5,000 square feet is consistent with mobile home park standards. Streets and utilities for the, project must meet'Subdivi- sion'Regulation standards. She stated as,'the pre`posal does not violate the overall intensity standard, access is by a collector stre3t'or larger,'strict site plan control can be guaranteed and recreation area is provided, staff recommends approval of Z-1684 with conditions: 1) A five (5) foot living screen will be installed And maintained around the perimeter of the property. 2) Single family (SF-7) standards will be applied with the exception of lot size. 3) That adequate right-of-way, 501, be provided from FM 2164. P Z Minutes September 12, 1984 Page ' 7 4) That street patterns and layouts be approved by the city Engineer, Mr. Blackwell stated; Ito foals the peppie from the college have a legitimate excuse for opposition and he will he more than willing to work with them in regard to the lighting. Chaim declared the public hearing closed, Mr. Pearson stated in response to questions raised, the City plan has an arrangement to balance the traffic. However, in view of the fact that.tho Developaisht Guide tries to dispense all types of housing dovelopaent'in all areas of the city, he stated he feels there are too many mobile homes in this area. Mr. gscue stated he in troublA4 by the concentration and intends to vote against the proposal. Mr. Pearson made a motion.to deny Z-1684. Seconded by LMr. Escue and carried unanimously (70). 11. Election of chairperson and vice chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Chairman LaForte stated after serving two years is chairman, he would decline to run as a candidate fot re-election. Mr. Meyer stated the nominations are open for chairman. Mr. Eactie nominated vice-chairman Bill Claiborne for chair- man. Mr. Claiborne accepted the nomination. Seconded by Ms. Cole. Mr. Juren stated he protested, as he thought the'moti,on was for Mr. Claiborne to be vice-chairman. Mr. Eacue made a motion s i 'hor:N'ider the motion for chair- man. Seconded by Mr, Le,; A carried, 4-2, (Pearson and LaForte voted no.) Mr. Escue nominated vice-chairman Bill Claiborne for chairman. Mr. Juren nominated Andy Sidor for'chairman. Mr. Sidor`ac- cepted the nomination, Mro U'Forte made a motion for nominations to caste. Setoyded by Ms. Cole. Vote wAs cilled for CWborne: A e - Mr. C1aiharne, Ms. Cole, r. scue, Mr. a orte and Ar, Pearson; may Mr. Juren and Mr. Sidor. sc PLANNING AND 1,*XNO COMMISSION,, RECOMMENDATION TO THE CIT'Y COUNCIL To; Denton city council Case No,: Z-1691 Meeting Date; October 16, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Bob Crouch 001 North Locust Denton, TX 76201 statu$ or Applicant: Owner'$ representative Requested Action: Change from the agricultural (A) Zbnipq,clarsifioatioa to the light industrial (LI) classification Location and site: Approximately 20 acts parcel located on the north side of Fishtr'ap Road, approximately 2,4001eet east of the T. & P., M.K. & T. Railroad. Surround3.nq Land Use and Zoning: North - Railroad, single family residential, vacant South - Vacant; PD-56 East - Single family residential; A West - single family residential, plant nursery and landscaping business; mobile home parks A Denton Development Guide: Area, not covered by Development. Guide SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: A branch drains through the cuddle of this tract. Drainag'e,is a major concern at this site and detention will probably be required. Transportation: Fishtrap Road will be a collector In this area with 60, of right-of-way and 411 of pavement. Pedrimeter Street paving regulations will be applicable for'Fishtrap Road. s (Case 01691) Page Two ANALYSIS This site is located on the fringe of the limits of major urban development as defined by theDenton Development Guide, Conse- quently, the site is also on the fringe of the Development Guide study and policy area. A moderate intensity nou4 is located at the Tnter,sootton of Loop 28e and Highway W. The area east of the moderate node and west of this tract has a low intensity designation. A hodgappodga of uses including industrial, retail, commercial and residential exist in this vicinity, This area was annexed into the Oi,ty lost year and most of thes4,uses are legal non-cohforrsing 'ysea, The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council r4oently granted a xoninq change from agricultural (A) to light industrial (LI).soninq,on approximately 65 acres looated to the southwest of this tract on.the west side o#. Geeslinq Road. Other` currently existing industrial' uses located west of 06oSlinq Road include the Safety K1een Corporation and the Green Giant processing plant. Approximately 100 acres of light' industrial (LI) xonaq already exists in this area. The 'Planning and zoning Commission felt that the proposed land use was consistent with existing land use and zoning in the area. R RCOMMENDATI ON The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of z-1691 by a vote of 7-0. ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition 2. Deny raquest ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Reply Form Totals 3. Property owner List 4. Minutes of Planning and zoning Commission meeting of September 26, 104. 0446s s INS" w';; bra ' ~ x ' i ~A f fc~ n t ° ' ; . f } s, _ Rk r jr T1 yy . f t. 4 tl P , .0:; ajt .R ~ i f •4(,. of 1 ry a I r r y A'o 5~p 1/.', ~ ai:: 5~ tFyFy & ~ + 5 k4k 4 r it'k ftAPLr1t''`Y OWM RFULY ro" oITY COUNCIL Z-1691 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED No Name on None Received one reply form received in favor AAA Al ' 1s a 2 Lea r 9 r - ?502 ~Y r~ r Y , ..rte.... a P Z,K ItNe aeptaaber 26, 1984 Pago 3 81 rL*1691. This it the petition of 'Bob Grouch rquesting a afi'nge in zoning from the agrioulturaI (A), district to the light industrial (LI) district on an approximately 20 acre parcel located on the north side of N'ishtrap oV~p Road, approximately 2,400 Peet east of T it P, MKT Rail- PP roadhe property is more particularly described as lots*1-16 of the Meadow Lark Addition. Ms. Spivey stated there were 11 roply forms mailed to pproperty owners within 200 feet of 't he subject property; 2 were returned in favor and one in opposition. Mr. Bob Crouch stated he is representing Mr, Lambert and Mr. Rama and is xequeeti g that the Commission grant the zoning of light ictdustxia 'for the purpose of oonetruc- tion of metal warehouse building$s on oho acre tracts. He stated Mr. ~imbert's property ad oins 'this'pro 4rty on the north side and the'ra,lroad ~oins on the south side. ^He described the surrounding land uses. He stated the tract was annexed approximately a year and a half ago, with, the understanding it would be taken in as tight industrial, instead, it was taken in as agricultural. He stated he keels there is a need for these metal warehouse buildings and the one acre tracts have already been plat- ted. He stated there would be between 4,000 and 5,000 square feet in the buildings. On question from Mr. LaPorte, Mr, Crouch stated no, no sewer system exists, we would have to have a septic system. On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Crouch stated there is water on each lot and it is already stubbed out, The system is a private well. Mr. Juren asked it these are like mini-warehouses. Mr. Crouch answered no, they are warehouses with an office in front and warehouse in back similar to those on Woodrow Lane. Mr. Kevin Bradshaw, an area resident on Collins Road, stated there is no water and no sewer and this will make a hardship on our existing wall tables, He stated there is no`city fire protection as this area is served by the Mayhill Fire Department. He stated he feels this will bring this area down if allowed to develop light ind'ts- trial. u, ! PIS Z Minute Septouber'26, 1984 Page 4 On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Bradshaw stated he was a cattle farmer. Ms. Spviey stated this site is located on the fringe of the limits of major urban develo went ae defined by the Denton Development guide. She sated the site is also on the fringe oi' the Development Guide study and olioy Area a moderate intensity node is located at he inter- sect on of Loop 288 and Highway 380. The area east of the moderate node and west of this tract hoe a low'inten- city designation, She stated a hodgg•podge of uses in- c1'uding induatrialo rota 1, commereial, and residential exist l.A this vicinity. This area'was annexed into the City in the last year and a half end most of these uses ark legal non-aonforsingg uses. She continued the Plan ning and Zoning Ca fission and City.council recently gra~ited a aonin; bh#nge-fro* ;agricultural (A) to light industrial (U) zoning on approximately 65 acres located tothe southwest of this tract on the west side of Geesling Road. Other currently existing industrial uses located •West'of -Goosl .ng Road include the Safety Kleen Corporation and the Green Giant or Pillsbury processing plant, The uses existing to the east of Goool'ing'Road are generally leas intense than the above mentioned uses. Staff feels that industrial type land use should be limited in an area such as this one that is Adjacent to a low intensity area, She stated approximately 100 acres of light industrial LI) zoning already exists in this area. She also states this area is already platted as a county plat. It will be difficult to get immediate improvements as it is already platted; therefore, staff recommends denial of Z-1691. Mr. Sidor asked if not zoned light industrial, what other uses could this land be used for. Mr. Ellison stated staff has not considered any studies and do not have any specific recommendations for this property. Mr. Ham stated this property, if allowed to be zoned light industrial, according to the Subdivision Re u1 ations, requires 3,000 gallons per minute (g.p.m.1 of water to sevice this site. He stated water available to this site only allows for 1500 plus S.p.m. Wiles sliptest 6, 1984 Page s On_question from Mr. Juren, Me. Spivey stated yes, the petitioner has been advised of the expenses he would incurr"if he had to go through normal platting process. Mr. Morris stated the Subdivision Regulations apply to all development in the city and are required to go through the plattingg process, This general development plate apply and would require off-site and on-site regulations. Mr. Buren questioned if we allow a zoning change, they will have to comply with off-sits and on-site improvements during the platting process. It's not a question for debate? Mr. Morris stated 'whether or not it is platted is not the question, its lard beiri developed, If you, allow a change in zoning, the petitioner or developer would have to `come back with a preliminary plan or plat. Mr, gidor commented if this zoning change is approved, and then opted to sell, we'd be in a bind as it s not adequately serviced with utilities. Mr. Morris stated the Commission can impose requirements that they feel would adequately serve this development. He further stated the. Commission is rezoning the land without knowing the particular' development of it. On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Crouch stated no, they had not considered a planned development as their intent is to build on one acre lots on the fringe of the city. Mr. Sidor asked if the other lots would be for sale. Mr. Crouch answered yes, that is correct. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Chairman Claiborne stared he has no major objections. His objection is, will the 'property be brought up to city standards. Mr. l.aForte commented that he is not opposed, however, he feels it should be adequately serviced. eta 1 UVtember 26, 1984 Palo 6 Mr. Pearson stated in view of the fact there is other li ht industrial in the area, he intends to vote for the pe ition. Mr. Sidor commented on his conc,.~rn in regard to the inadequacy of water service to the property. Mr. Ham stated currently the service carries at 1500 g.p.m* and it is roughly three-fourths of a agile to the nearest water main. There are plans in the Capital Improvements' Plan, Phase It to enlarSo the mains; how- ever, that is from 3 to _S years away beforo we would.be able to provide 3,000 g.p.s. He further stated we could allow a septic tank if only minisus use it anticipated, such as two toilets and if approved by the director of utilities. Mr LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1691 with the condition that all dsvelopment shall comply to the.City of Denton Subdivisiotil and Land Development Reg- ulations app)y as applied to light industrial. Seconded I by Mr. Pearson and unanimously carried (7-0). C. 'L-1692. This is the petition of Charles Watkins, repre- sennttng Karl F, Young, requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the oommercial (C) dis- trict on two tracts totaling 18.8 acres located on the west side of Loop 288 approximately 2500 feet south of East McKinney Street (tM 426). The property is located directly across Loop 288 from the eastern extension of Morse Street. Ms. Spivey stated there were 6 reply forms-mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property; one was returned iii favor and zero in opposition. Mr. Charles WoNkins stated he was representing Mr. Charles Young who owns 18.8 acres on Loop 288. He sta- ted he has owned the property since 1971 and is re- questing commercial zoning. He gave the ourrounding land uses. He stated1there is a major flood plain in this area. He further stated this propertti.is located in a high density area across from a light industrial zoned area and the ppetitoner is relying on the 'city's Capital Improvements Plan for water. He stated this request is in line with the Denton Development Guide. 9 ;1 .Y06* t NO. G THE ING TEXASo AS NSAM WASIcADOPTED ASNAN APY NDIX TO THEE CODED OFLRDOI- NANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE, NO. 69.1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIHATML 20 ACRES OF LAND SI%ATED IN THE T. H. LIVING SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 729 AND THE M. FORREST SURVEY A$STUCT No, 4X7 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH hIDE OF FISHTRAP ROAD APPkOXIMATELY 2 400 FEET EAST OF -T i P MKT RAILROAD TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATIONTO LFROM AGRICULTURAL IGHT INDUSTRIAL "LI" ICILASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable to All or part of the property ¢eecribed below, is hereby ch4a1ed" from, Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Light Industrial "LI" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas; All that certain lot, treat or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Donton, State of Texas and being located in the T. H, hiving Survey, Abstract No. 729 and the M. Forrest Survey, Abstract No. 417, Denton County, Texas and being Lots 1 through 16 of the Meadow Lark Addition located on the north side of Fiahtrap Road, approximately 2,400 feet east of T 6 P MKT Railroad. SECTION II. That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable to all or part of the property described below is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Light Industrial "LI" District Claasifl.cation and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas; SECTION III. The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopts,) the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the rode of Ordinances of the city of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use. SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Taxaa, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular ueas, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. Z-1691/BOB CROUCH/PAGE 1 1 ' SECTION V. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and a~ pproval, the rdquired public hesrinSo having heretofore boon held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texan, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994. CITY QX DENTON, TEXAS i ATTESTS CITY 08 DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM= JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY 7 4' ~ e/v~ Z-1691/80B CROUCH/PAGE 2 ' 54 (2. Pt;AN1 KING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.s Z-1692 Meeting Date: October 160 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION f Applicants Charles Watkins representing Karl F* Young 8585 Stemmons Freeway, 500 South Dalla;sr TX 75247 Status of Applicants Owner0s representative Requested Actions Change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the commeroial (C) classification. Location and Sizes An 18.S acre tract located on the went side of Loop 2$8 approximately 2,500 feet south of East McKinney Street (F.M. 426). The propertyy is located directly across Loop 288 from the eastern extension of Morse Street. Existing Land Uses Vacant Surrounding Land Use and zonings North - Single family structures A South - Vacantr A East - Vacant, insurance offices LI West - Vacant A Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as high intensity. SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: This tract has major floodway/ floodplain restrictions. F'.S.M.A. regulations must be followed for revisions of the floodway/floodplain. On=site drainage is not a major con- cern but detention should be used to minimize the effects of development. ~7 '7o Case Not Z-1692 Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Transportation: This tract has Frontage on Loop 288, a priwary major arterial. The T;,oroughfare Plan shows Morse Street, a secondary major arterial,extending through this property. Morse Street currently has 70 feet of right-of- way, but 80 feet is preferred, A north-south collector street 1500 feet west of Loop 288 is nhown on the Thoroughfare Plan, This street ghoul be designed with this property. Utilities: Utilities are a major concern with this tract. Water service is available at the western end of the eastern addition of Morse Street and on the west side of Loop 288 south of Spencer Road, Sewer service is available at the Morse Street - Loop '18 intersection and an 18" line on the east side of Loop 288. Water and sewer lines must be extended to serve this tract. Elogtric and phone service are available to the site, but gas service must be extended to this location. i - ANALYSIS In spite of its current agricultural (A) zoning classification, I the site in this request is located in a high intensity area. This particular area has an employment emphasis, but diversity is encouraged. Furthermore, this area is adjacent to the Golden Triangle Mall center which is designated as the City's dominant commercial center, The Development Guide encourages a substan- tial.emgloyment balance in this area which is intended to providi> at maximun development 600 acres of commercial and industrial uses representing over 11,000 Jobs. Commercial zoning is consistent with these goals. RECOMMENDATION The planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1692 by a vote of 6-1. Case No. Z-1692 Page Three ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition 2. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Reply Form Totals 3. Property Owner List 4. Minutes of Planning and Zoniisg Commission meeting of September 26, 1984 i 08059 1 PRpP$RTX OWNER RyE LY FORMS 1a;,i 1 rl,a;; CITY, 4OVNC L Z-1692 IN FAVO IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Karl F, Young. None Reosived 8583 stommons, 500 South Dallas, TX 75247 I i r II A 7 ..r 1 G) 1 ~ I A ~ 26 75 I i l 'I i77,-, G1 ' - r-irrR-----•~t -ITT V t Ik Z Minute Uptembes g6o 1964 INSO 6 Mr. Pearson stated in view of the fact there is other light industrial in the area, he intends to vote for the petition. Mr. 8idor commented on his concern in regard to the inadequacy of water service to the property. Mr. Ham stated 6urrentl.y the service caxries at 1$00 g.,poso and it is roughly three-fourths of mile to the nearest water vain There are plans in the Capital Improveaents Plan, Phase I, to enlarge the mains; how- ever, that to from 3 to 5 years away before we would be able to provide 3,000 a.p.m He further stated we could allow a septic tank if only minimum use is anticipated, such as two toilets and if approved by the director of utilities. Mrs LmForK* made a motion to recommend approval of Z-1691 with the condition that all development shall comply-to the City of Denton Subdivision and Land Development Rag ulations apply as applied to light industrial, Seconded by Mr. Pearson and unanimously carried (7-0). C.FZ-16 2 This is'the petition of Charles Watkins, repro- eonting Karl F. Young, requesting a change in zoning from O the agricultural (A) district to the commercial (C) dis- PP~Ov6 westtsideCof Looptracts 288totaling approximately acres 25001feet/southtof Cu East McKinney Street (FM 426). The property is located directly across Loop 288 from the eastern extension of Morse Street. Ms. Spivey stated there were 6 reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property; one was returned i. favor and zero in opposition. Mr. Charles Watkins stated he was representing Mr. Charles Young who owns 18.8 acres on Loop 288. He sta- ted he has owned the property since 1971 and is re- questing commercial zoning, He gave the surrounding land uses. He stated there is a major flood plain in this area. He further stated this pro arty is located in a high density area across from a light industrial zoned area and the ppetitoner is relying on the city's Capital Improvements Plan for water. He stated this request is in line with the Denton Development Guide. i p ~1 Z -"b41tes Upteslber 26, 1964 8aSo 7 On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Watkins stated Mr, Young is io the process of l.ookin into types of development, he has had a marketing feasibility survey done in 1981 And is currently in the process of updating that survey, Mr. Sidor asked why the petition was for s~,Aght commercial zoning instead of a planned devei,`pment. Mr. Watkins stated bocaube this to in a high intensity area. He stated they were intending to go with planned development, but upon recommendation of the staff, decided to go commercial. No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request. Me. Spivey stated in spite of its current agricultural (A) Bonin cl;aaaifi'atign, the site in this request is located i a high iritensity area. This particular area has an employment emphasis but diversityy is encouraged, She stated this area is adjAcent to the Golden Triangle Mall 'enter which is designated as the city's dominant commercial center. She further stated the Development Guide encourages a substantial employment baiAncs ire this area which is intended to provide at maximum development 600 acres of commercial and industGrial`uses re resenting over 110;000 jobs. Commercial zoning is consistent with these goals, therefore, staff recommends approval of Z-w1692.. Mr. Pearson asked Mr. Watkins the results of the marketing survey that was done. Mr. Young stated he had had the survey done in 1981, and at that time, the statistics indicated that apartments would be appropria~.e with a strip center. He stated he is not a developer or a builder, therefore, this would be a joint venture. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Sidor commented that 'since this is a high intensity area, i1e has no reason to go against the recommendation of the staff. Mr. Sidor made a motion to recommend approval of 2-1692. Seconded by Mr. Juren and motion carried 6-1. (Mr. t Claiborne voted no.).; I'LlWNE1V~ "D ZONING COlMISSION RNCOMMUDAT I ON "'0 THE CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council case No.: Z-1694 Meeting Date: October 16, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Curtis Hodgson R,W,G,P,, Inc. 5336 Alpha Road, Suite 5 Dallas, TX 75240 Status of Applicant: Owner Rellaetted Action: change from the agricultural (A)_ zoning ckassifio tioa to the planned deVelapment (PD) classification, If approved, the PD will perAit the development of le single family (SF-7) lots along the south side of Paige Road and 11 one acre estate lots along the west side of Swisher Road. Location and Size: A 17,1_aore traot located at the southwest corner of Paige Road and Swisher Road. Surrounding Lend Use and Zoning: North - Single family residences, vacant South - Shiloh Cemetery, single family residences, vacant East Single family residences West - Vacant Denton Development Guide: Area not covered by guide. SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: County F.E.M.A. maps show a major floodplain in this area. Developer must follow all F'.E.M,A, guidelines on nap revisions and amendments. Detention is strongly urged to Mini ■ize the effects of this development. a r ~CsNe N Z~1d96) aqe Two SPECIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Transportation: Paiga Road is a collector street with a m nimum of 60 feet of right-of-way; 30 feet from center line, The developer will be required to improve 17 feet of road and the City will improve 7 additional feet if it is needed to properly use the road. Off-site improvements may be required during the platting stage. Utilities: An a" water line must be extended do Paige Road or down Shady Shores Road from the Coribth water Motor to serve this devbl'opmont, A limited Analysis of the lift station - forasmainsyste indioatee that neither one has suffi- cient capacity to handle the existing approved development plus this one. The,developer,will be responsible 1 or providing adequate sewer service for this development. A gas vain must be exteaded`.to this area and the City of Denton will provide electrical service. ANALYSIS This area is outside the limits of the Denton Development fluids study area, but the area is basically dominated by agricultural and low density residential land use. The developer seeks per mission to develop eleven (11) one acre estate lots for single family land use along the west side of Swisher Road, The proposed use is compatible with the large lot residential sub- division of Chaparral Estates on the east side of Swisher Road. The developer also seeks permission to develop eighteen (18) single family (SF-7 W typical lot size of 1171 X 621) lots along the south side of Paige Road. 'These iota, while not as large as the estate lots MentionedAbove, will be compatible with the residential character of the area. (CaAte Nx»1691) Page Three RECOMMENDATION The Planning kind Zoning Commission reoommenda approval of Z-1694 by a vote of 7-0 with the following conditions: 1. P;irimoter street paving requirements shall be imposed along the entire frontage of Paige Road. 2. Estate road conditions will be imposed on SWisher goad - a pavement width of twenty-four (24),feet without curbs is allowed for one aore lots with one hundred (100) feet or more frontage for single family use. 3. A six (6) foot solid fence will be erected along the south boundary line of this developosnt where it abuts Shiloh Cemetery. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition with conditions 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Approve petition without conditions 4. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. PD COnnept Plan 3. Reply Form Totals 4. Property Owner List 5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of September 26* 1984. 06069 g!, v -1 v r 1 NORTH j (i 1+i, f~ ' I 111 +~r {3 \ \ PROJQ T SIT[ \ 1~ PAGE RD, t COUNTY` JSE br \ ..rr CITY 0 F CENT AN !A~^„~i4,~ f + CORINTH yrSw i' RCEKYYOCP FpRCST mILLS 1 _ LLA HECK R w MIS1Y~iLEN WAL CHURCH 001 1 III Med wai yR,t,y,lt, y,~a,r ~tII i'''i'i' . I f~, ,j.,c 0.l #r'h rj' i rr.~rwr.wrw rrrw~+r,wr.ru, r ~ •+.rtwrw~~ r • .wrr ~1..-, I f~`~ V r. a I? ! DATA : Total Gross acres 17.10 r Totes S-7 Lots IS rcecocion Total Estate bits 11 r-p o nkl l Retention Poild I.86Il . ROW Dedlcutlon 2.69 uc. 'AAnR nn approximate! r rORfr,~ art ' II t COUNTY I- . CORIRTM I Mh 4„-4 . mow.. 4 0 t + OMNI" V1 Vicinity Map ROLLINGNVOOD ESTATES 'A.n Addition to tho City of Denton,Texua Developerl ' RwGP, INC, l 5336 ,'Alpha Rd Dallas.Texas 75240 Contact, CuOW' Hodgson 214/ %0.279.1 a. P OPERTY Ma UPLY Foxim CITY COUNCIL S5-1694 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITIQN UNDECIDED Nona Reaeived Carl H. aohnspn ROQt* 4, Box 132 Denton, TX 76205 7 -77 "1, 41 All I'l vet 0 4b V~ Milli 7 41 A (22) 44 -A k4). i 1 -A A5 0 G. w / L A 'y , 7J~ 4 77 '77 e p k g Minutes 8rptembev 26, 1984 Page 8- D. Wv 3. This is the petition of Monte R. Meson iv eloper) requestin a change in the current zoning classification from single family (SF-7) to commercial (C) on a tract of 1643 acres of land situated south of and abutting I4H. 35-9 and oommencing appproximately 360 feet north of Lindsay Street and'150 feet east of McCormick Street. The said tract of land forms part of T'omkine Survey #►1246 And is described as lots 4.1, 5 and 6 of plat 350, Denton. R.~ Z-1694. This is the petition of R. W. G. P., Inc., represented by Curtis Hodgson, requesting a change in zoning from-the agricultural (A) district to the planned PPP~°06 darcelplocated pat the southwest corner oft Ps 1791 VS Swisher Ro,adso Zf appro d, the, p annad development will permit 18 single fawly lots '1ainimum lot size 7,000 square foot) along the south side of Paige Road and 11 single family estate lots (minimum lot size one acre) along the west side of Swisher Road. Ms, Spivey stated there were 10 reply forme mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject.property; two were returned in opposition and zero in favor. Mr. Curt Hodgson stated he is the president and sole share holder of R.W.G.P. He stated this property is 17.1 acres ad scant to Swisher and Paige Roads. There will be 18 SF'-7 lots along Paige Road and 11 one acre estates alongg Swisher Road. He stated he has spent a great deal of time trying to make a transition zone between the resi- dential across on Swisher Road and his next project which is next on the agenda. He stated one of the issues that will come up `at the platting stage is the roads. Hfa stated he has a planned` development application in, which affords the Commission the leewa to direct as they wish the roads, namely Paige and Swisger Roads, their dedica- tion and construction. He has shown on the plat a 30 foot from center line dedication along Paige Road and has anticipated that Paige Road will be constructed according to collector'strpet specifications. He stated what he has shown and what he wants may differ a little bit and that he has met and discussed with the staff, the plans for Swisher Road and are still` in the arguing stage about k 'rk li Miouta• September, 26, 1984 Page 9 what Swisher Road might become one day. He stated what he is proposingg on the plat is a 30 foot dedication from centerline al]~owing in the future a collector. type street along Swisher Road, He further stated what he would like to do is to con- struct that 'road to an estate subdivision, a one acre estate subdivision, and that construction standards would bit a 24 foot wide pavement width and would use the exist- in draining patterns of the area rather than dig down an make that a more major road and take away one and possibly two rows of trees. He stated the advantages of the application as he has it with the one acre estates, if he can do an estate type road, is that it would involve significantly less tosts_ of constructing that road; it would preserve the rows of trees on both sides of it as they are now and would make the one acre estates marketable. On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr, Hodgson stated a liar ditch system, rather than a concrete curb or storm sower system, which already exists now. On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Hodgson stated no, these will not be manufactured homes, but site built homes. On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Hodgson stated yes, there will be curb and gutter along Paige Road, Brian Burke 'stated Mr.'Rodggson had contacted him for advice on drainage, utilities and roadways and his main concern is that all work is done according to city And county standards. He stated he would be available for questions regarding this and the next ciao, Mr, F.F, Taylor stated he didn't know if he was in opposition or not. He stated he is the president of the Shiloh Cemetery and if they widen Shiloh Road, it will mean we will have to dedicate 30 foot of right-of•way and it Will go into the cemetery whore there are raves. `He stated he is not in favor of not having a buffer zone around the cemetery. He commented he would like to know how the developer proposes to keep the water from draining into the cemetery. 71- 1, 7 71 ji t' P i Z Minutes Septo"or 26 s 1994 Page 10 Neil Snyder, a resident of Chapparral Estates, stated he was speaking in opposition basically because this proposal is married to the adjoining property that Mr. Hods on is going to develop. He stated the Chap- paral Estates residents are very much opposed to the manufactured homes that are tied into this proposal. Ms. Spivey stated this area is outride the limits of the Denton Development Guide study area, but the Area is basicallyy dominated by agricultural and love density residential land use. The developer seeks permission to develop eleven one sore estate lots for single family land use along the west side of Swisher Soal, She stated the proposed use is coup atible with the large lot res denti.al subdivision of chaparral Estates on the east side of Swisher Road. The, developer al o seeks permission to develop `ei hteen single family Sf-7 lots along the south side of Paige Road. These lots while not as large as the estate lots mentioned, will be compatible with the rssi- dential character of the area. She stated staff reeom. mends approval of Z-1694.with the condition that peri- meter street `paving requirements be imposed along the entire frontage of Paige and Swisher Roads. Mr. Ham stated although there is a sewer line that goes through this property from Corinth and a lift station and a forced main on this property, these are not of the capa- city that will take on this load. The utility staff is of the opinion that a new lift station and a new forced main parallel will be required to serve this develop- ment. He also stated there is no water, to this site and a new water line would have to be run from the Corinth water meter over to this site. On question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr. Has stated not I have had no assurance or denial by the developer that he would do this. Mr. Olyai stated the staff'study which was included in your packet recommends Swisher Road to be a collector size right-of-way and built to those'specificatioins$ He stated it is his understanding that the developer is roposino the same amount of right4of-way which is 60 feet, but construction of an estate type facility which requires 24 feet of ppavement without any curb and gutter and which will be built based on the existing topogra- 7: T" P 4 Z ~IiauCaa aaptswb`er 26. 1984 Page 11 phical features of the area, possible ending up having aligneent problems through usage of existing crown sections on the roadways. He stated he is strongly opposed to that as he feels a collector size street is warranted, on question from Mr. Claiborne, Mr, Olyai stated this area is outside our study guide and we do not have an indicator to go by. He stated what we try to do follow- ing the meeting between the developer and key staff ■embera, is to find out and define the planning area and to be able to estimate the trip eneration this entire area will producso pie stated this area will include a great portion of the flood plain due northeast of it, and it was hard to define how auch of this area will be developpable. Ho'stated it requires sore surveys to be done, therofore, we cannot tell what percentage of this area will be developed, He stated Paige Road is a'collector site street, Shady Shores has been designated by Corinth to be 'a'primary major arterialo thus having 100 feet of right-of-way. He stated there needs to be a collector size street feeding to a major arterial. There needs to be a connection between the two streets, one being Paige Road and Shady Shores Road which we thought was a collector size street which is not. Swisher Road in this section is the city limit line. He stated in his opinion, he feels Denton needs to control its own destiny rather than sending the issue to the City of Shady Shores at this connection between the two roads made, He stated since the county road is already existing it is more reasonable to use it for part of this connection which turns out to be a collector strut, on question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Olysi stated yes, there still needs to be curb and gutter as per subdivision regulations. Mr. Hodgson stated in regard to Mr, Taylors concern, the drainage problem would moat likely be worked out by pproviding a drainage flume and as far as widening Swisher Road, he stated it would not provide for anything wider. than a 24 foot wide road and would not interfere with the cemetery, He stated 'there was nothing in his proposal with regard to a buffer zone between his.property and the cemetery, however, he 'statad he would be glad to put 'up a 6 foot fence. ~ Nr j 4 . P Is z Minutes September 96, 1964 Page 12 Judy Russell$ a resident of Chaparral Estates, commented they don't want the road widened as it will take away their view and their natural buffer scone of 100 year old oak trees. Morris Pearson, a resident of Chaparral Estates, stated in his opinion there is no market for one acre lot homes and this would be an unworkable situation, He wanted to know what will happen in two years after the lots don't sell, can the developer come in and put his mobile homes on these lots. Ms. Spivey stated no, as this is a planned development for one acre estate lots. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Mr, Claiborne commented he would be in favor of as estate type road. Mr. Sidor commented he would not object to an estate type road with a 30 foot dedication from the canter line, Me. Cole stated she would be in favor of leaving the vooAd as is. Mr. LaPorte stated he agrees with the neighborhood. Mr. Escue stated he agrees with Mr. LaPorte. Mr. Juren commented 24 feet with a 30 foot right-of- way dedication would be adequate in his opinion. Mr. Pearson commented he would be in favor of leaving the street with `the trees as is. Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of 2-1694 with the following conditions: 1) That perimeter street paving r~,,quirements be imposed along the entire frontage of Paige Road. 2) That a 6 foot solid fence be errected along the southern boundary of this development where it abutts the Shiloh Cemetery. dh>lt~niMfs 30• 1181 p•«• l~ , 1) $wisher load will have 40 teat of right•of-Way, but will be developed as an estate type road (which means 29 toot of pavement and no curb). Secoaded by Mr, Sidor and unanimously carried 17-0), P, :-U.L This is the petition of at If$ at P40 Iac., representsd by Curtis Hodgson, requesting a 004490 in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned developosnt Ito) district on a 4904 acre tract in the aiaaon Walker Survey# Abstract 3130, The property is located on the north aid* of shady Shors$ Road approxi- matsly 150 toot West of $wisher Road, It approi►ed, the planned developMe'nt will permit the development of a 27% lot manufactured housing subdivision. Ns, spivev stated there veto s reply torah mailed to property owners within 200,$*ot of the subject propectyl two were returned in opposition and sere in favor. Met Curt Hodgson stated this land adjoins the previously discussed proposal. No *toted the St'reet$ will be 31 t*o t wide and he is proposing an 5-toot t*noe on,thady sooro$ lload* as is planning to 'plant trees and'sbrubs between the two pproposals as a buffer sons. p• gave a list of the seanities he is proposing and stated the estimated cost of the homes will be from $30,000 to $90,000 as target market. Me stated he doesn't mind dedicating an additional 50 feet tight-ot-way and owning land next to a major arterial, go stated this proposal is very similar to his proposal of July 1964 with the revisions 'as suggested by the opposition, the staff and the Commission. Lynn, hider stated her concerns are with the crossing of the oreak. She".wtat*d a single entrance and exit to her, would be a traffic hazard. Met Morris Pearson, a resident of Chaparral »states, stated he was speaking as a formality as be Is 100 percent in opposition to the manufactured homes this developer is proposing. pa stated the previous proposal is a step in the right direction, but not for manufaotured housing. On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Pearson stated he would love to see single family homes there rather than manu- factured homes. And not necessarily sr-7 as he feels this is very inconsistent zoning. ff it ,v"~'+"---•^"--`---'„n'-.r;,m-. 119TA xON~Nq G`OINI8$ION +✓`"'i Pta►1t~1 DNS) ROCOW NMAff ioN TO THR CITY COUNC I b To: Denton City Council Case No,: Z-1695 Meeting Date: October 16, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Curtis N, Hodgson R.M,o.P., Inc. 6336 Alpha Rd, Suite 5 Dallas, TX 76740 Status of Applicant: owner Requested Action: Chang• fros the agricultural (A) xonibg,alaisitioation to the planned 4e016patat (PD) 'classifioati,on, It apn:rOVed. the PD Will permit the development of a 275 lot manufactured housing subdivision. Location and Size: A 49 acre tract located on the north side of Shady 'Shores 'Road 'approxi- mately 250 feet west of Swisher Road. surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residences, vacant South - Single family residences, vacant East - Shiloh Cemetery, single family residences West - Single family residences, vacant Demos Development Guide: Area not covsred by Guide. SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: County F,E.M.A. saps Show a major floodplain in this area. Developer must follow all F,N.M,A, guidelines on :rap revisions and amendments. Detention is strongly encouraged to minimize the effects of this develop- ,,T. ~~Oas• N.u i-l~l1i) Page s Two SPgCYAL INFORMATION (Continued) Drainage: (Continued) sent. Manufactured homes must be 1 foot above 100 year storm 10V61- Utilities: An 0" water line must be oxtended do Paige Road or down Shady shores Road from the Corinth water meter to sarve this development, A limited analysis of the lift station - foroemain system indicates that neither one has suffi- oient capacity to handle existing approved developpsent plus this one. The developer W111 be responsible for providing adequate sewer service for the development. A gas main must be extended to this area and the City of Denton Vill provide electrical service. Transportation: Shady shores, a primary Major ar- terial, should be improved, Off-site street improvements may, be required during the platting stage. ANALYSIS This area is outside the limits of the Denton Development Guide study area. The evaluation of manufactured housing subdivision/ mobile home park requests has become a difficult task largely because most are proposed in areas initially within the extra- territorial jurisdiction. The proposed development, a manufactured housing subdivision, differs from a mobile home park in that the lots will be owner occupied rather than rented. As aresult, this devel'opsent will be regulated by the Subdivision Rool'ations rather than the Mobile Home Park Ordinance. Annexation has recently been com- pleted on this tract. This application for planned development soginq allows the planning and Zoning Commission and the City council to, vary'the standard requirements of the City. The plan, as submitted, indicates some variances from normal stan-~ lords; therefore, approval of the site plan. unless specifically noted otherwise, also constitutes approval of the noted var- iano o. The opposite rule will also apply. All City of Denton development codes and their requirements are to be followed unless specifically noted otherwise on the plan or in the final ordinance conditions. ~Ca4e M S~1S11~) 04190 Three t i ANALYSIS (Continued) Thor* are several poai,•ive aspects to this proposal, Lot sixes in this proposal will be a minimum of 5400 squats toot and an average of 6400 square test. The density level will be 5-6 units per sore. Research of national trends in various planning related journals has revealed that the 5-6 unit per sore density level and $400 square toot lot site is considered an acceptable guidelins for manufactured housing communities. Manufactured housing is considered a form of diversified housing which is enooura¢ed in all areas of the city. The proposed deed restric- tions and homeowners' associotlon to enforce those restrictions are also positive factors, This proposal also comes closer to mestioQ the now policy limiting mobile home concentration to 200 units is one cluster. There is a growing concern over the fact that the overwhelming majority of manufactured housing* mobil* home parrsa and lost to moAsii a income housing in general is being conosntrat*d in the eastetn'quadrant of the city. RECOtaMMAT I ON The Planting and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1695 by a vote of 6-1 with the following conditions: 1. Street widths within the development must be 31 feet. 2. Proposed street alignments must be approved by the City Transportation Engineer and final approval of parking shall be reviewed by the Development Review committee. 3, Perimeter street paving rsquirements along the entire frontage of Shady Shores Road shall be imposed during the platting process. a. An 8 foot masonry/wood fence mast be erected along the southern property line on Shady Shores Road. 5. Tress shall be planted every twenty (20)feet along the eastern and northern boundaries of the property between this proposal and the proposed SE-7 and one sots estate lots. r~ r„i a z cl J'a r, (Case Z•ii5) Page Four RSCOiYi MATION' (Continued) 6. Setbacks shall be as follows: front: is feet Rear: 10 feet sides. 6 Cost x, Maximum lot Coverage allowed will be 40 percent. 9. No building, dwelling, structure, or fences shall be built or placed on a lot without the approval of the Homeowners, Association. 19, Any dwelling which is *rooted or placed on a lot shall contain at least 900 square fret of living 604064 shall have a roof with at least a 3/12 pitch, shall have a shingle roof (no metal or gravel), and shall have wood or masonry exterior (no motel) 10. Any dwelling which is erected or placed on a lot shall (a) be sot at A. distance of not nor, than 25 test and not lsss than 15 toot from the street unless such placement is impossible due to utilit~r sasenete. (b) be permanently attached to a concrete foundation, and (o) be finished or skirted to the ground with a material which is color- coordinated with the dwelling. The exact plaooment of any dwelling or, building on-any lot shall first be approved by the Homeowners' Association. 11. All lots will be landscaped with grass, shrubs, trees, decorative stone, bark, or other material designed for landscaping. The landscaping shall at all times be maintained, which maintsnance shall include (a) regular mowing and watering of grass, (b) raking leaves, (c) trimming trees and shrubs, (d) edging along road, concrete and sbrub beds, (e) trimming along' buildings, and (f) sweeping and cleaning walks and drives. 12. No trash, debris, auto parts, tools, eq%tipment, vehicles, bicycles, or toys shall be kept on any lot within view of the street or within view of adjacent property. 13. No antenna may be installed on any lot which extends for more than 15 feet above the dwelling. It. No person may live on or about any lot for more than 30 days in any twelve month period unless said person is the owner of the lot or a member of the immediate fa,sily of the owner of the lot. No rsntingl ~y 771 tG#t~ N $-~li9S) Page Five RNCOMM4' WATIOR (COnttnuod) 15, All structures on any lot shall lie kept in good repair. 16. Any,fonca'constructed on anyy lot shall be of wood or masonry, shall not ♦xasod aix feet in height, and shall be no closer than 30 feet to the street. 11, No towels, rugs, o'r laundryy shall be hung on or about any lot in such a manner that is visible from the street, 16. No more than two four-legged pets may be kept on any lot. The owner of each lot shall keep his pets on his property and shall insure that the pets stay oft of the common areas. 19`, If steps are required to enter the dwelling and the steps are`vigi,ble from the ettoot, than the steps must be made of oonbrete or masoary,. Alt' I"Otively, a wooden deck arrenq'"Ot MY be,used w ioh hat as part of its structure stops which are made of wood. provided that the deck has at least 80 square foot of floor area and providgd, further, that the,.deck arrangsaent be built in a good workmanlike manner with materials designed for outside 'use. Otherwise, no wooden steps sie permitted. 20.. The owner of each lot, his family, and his guests, 'shall at all times comply with these,covenants and restrictions, and shall likewise comply with all rules which the Homeowners, Association adopts. ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve the petition with conditions 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Approve 'the 'petition without conditions 4. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Site leap 2. Pb 'Conc+pt plan 3, Reply Form Totals 4. Ptoperty Owner List S. Kinutes of Planning and zoning commission meeting of September 25, 1984 0648q n. , -17777~1'71 T'-01 i NORTH it j , 3I.it PROJECT SITE r \ ~ ♦ SAGE RA. COUNTY ,u + 13 its r. alit ri' , li u ' p CIYY dF oLNT: • litl~ I I ,Iti'r~ tji'I i t t i 3~~ I ~t I t I E y G:.., .rr. r/ ~ r 'F,i, 'J,•!ihrt'•`;ry' j Ep ` CORINTH ASrfN < ~ AEEKwe00 ~ Y F Si NIL LS 3 LLA tpSTY tE CMUiRCM ev o....i,r_,r -.i-r.r 1. f " K4AW WHIN M.i MMMMnq 0 100 ! 000 i , DATA, 'Petal Oros Acres 40.41 ! _ F _ . T + I Towl No. of Lots 415 'j 1 I_l 11 in, Lot 1Vldth o' J f site AM 14) /i' I AVIPA41 LOT son A404' CommuoArods 1.37 , ~ ~ (ptxill pAVlllott, Pttrk, green Will, tratnk) Areu in Streets 6,46 ac, Act" am wpmsiuato! a -may 1 Cll.- , r J N64Ct lite ' ell, L - I COUNiY Vicinity Map `rr PROPOSED PO shlk>f, ROLLINGWOOD cemetery ESTATES 1VGp I~iG \ r - - V, An Addition to the City of Nnton,'1'exav. 5336 ' Iphu Rd. Commit urtis Hwgvm - %Shady SRwes yRoad~ (214)960.2791 P110 'S~4 . AOLY FORMS OITY COUNCIL INF ;VOA IN OPPOSITION UI D CIDER None Received. None Received r l 9-0 386 4 A 1t a i 5J 7 58 ♦ ~ . ~ N3111{koi "bier ii'. ilea page 13 3) Swisher Aoad will have 40 foot of right-of-way# but will be developed as an **tat* type road Iwhioh means 24 toot of pavement and no curb). Seconded by Mr. Sidon and unanimously Carried (7-0). r.~a This is the petition of h. w. 09 P., inc., represented by Curtis Hodgson, requesting a change in soninq from the agrioultural (A) district to the planned ~QOyti9~ development urveyo Abstract 1330s The tproperty tis located on the north side of Shady Shores Road approxi- ~UN aiately ISO test west of swisher Aoads it approved# the planned development will permit the development of a 275 lot manufactured housing subdivision. Ms. Spivey stated there wete S reply forma mailed to property owners within goo 'fast of the subjeot'property) two were returned in opposition and zero in favor. Mrs Burt Hodgson stated this land adjoins the previously disoysted p'tdpoaai. Hie stated the streets Will be 31 fast wide and he, in proposing an $ loot fance on shady Shores Aoad. Hs is planning to plant trees and shrubs between the two proposals as a buffer Bone. He gave a list of the amenities he is proposing and stated the estimated cost of the homes will be from $30,000 to $50#000 as target Market. He staved he doain't mind dedicating an additional 50 feet tight-of-wsy and owning land next to a major arterial. He stated this proposal is very similar to his proposal of July 1984 with the revisions as suggested by the opposition, the staff and the Commission. Lynn Snider stated her concerns are with the crossing of the creek. She,etated a single entrance and exit to 'her, would be a traffic rtasard. Mr. Morris Pearson, a resident of Chaparral Estates, stated he was speaking as a formality as he is 100 percent in opposition to the •anutsutuled homes this developer is proposing. He stated the previous proposal is a step in the right direction* but not for manufactured housing. On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Pearson stated he would love to see single family homes there rather than manu- factured homes. And not necessarily SF-7 as he feels this is' very inconsistent toning. f, i • ',4 ' N~,iwutaa ' •aptq~llei Zi, 1!!1 Pat$ `14 Ifs., Spivey etated this are to outside the limike'of the Penton Oavoli4osrt Guide study area. The 'evaluation of menufaetuC h4ueinq eubdivieioh/>aabi'le home park to- guests has b 0 ome a difficult task largely because most are proppoed in groat initially within the extra- territorial ~urisdicar,ion. The proposed developments a manufactured housing subdivision differs from a mobile home park in that the lots will be owner occupied rather than rented. This development will be regulated by the sub4tvisio~, ,aguletioos rather than the mobil* home park ordinance. "Anllexotion has recently been completed on this tract. This application for planned development sorting allows the planning and Aooinq commission and the City Counoil'to vary the standard reg4ttoments of the city* the planj, as submitted* indicates Some vationcss from nor'maX standards j therefor, Ilj~rovai of the site plane uhls t $pacificall,y'h0tddotkarMiaeo also'66481- titu.tod approval oS the noted vir'i&0000. The opposite rule will also apply, she stated alj city of Denton developsiont codes and their requirsoonts are to be followed unless,sp citicaily noted Otherwise on the plan or ii; the 'final ordinance conditions. She stated that* are Several poeiO8vo aspects to this proposal. Lot si`s'es in this prbpoaal will be a minimum of 5400 iqu#re feet an an avenge of 6400 square feet. The density level will be a and one-half to 5 unite per acre. She further stated mgftufaot~a:*d housing is oonsi- derd a•form of divetsified housing which is encouraged in all areas of the city. the proposed deed restrictions and homeowners' association to enforce those restrictions are also positive' factors. This proposal also comes cloier to meeting the new policy limiting mobile home concentration to 200 units in one cluster. Staff recommends approval of 2-1695 with conditions. Xr. d'uren commented he thought trees needed to be planted every 20 feet. Nro godgeon coamented he would be happy.to comply with any conditions the Commission might stipulate. Chair declared the public hearing closed. Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of z-1695 with the following conditions: -1 .'r.-; ....r . r 1 ! ~ N1M1)kes ~s~1a~rlllst ll14 fap~ is 14 street widths within the devolopmoat most be 31 feet. 2. Proposed $treat alignmonks most be approved by the city Transportation engineer and final approval of parking shall be reviewed by the Aevelo~ment Review Committee. 34 Peribster street paving requirements along the entire front4gs of Shady $hores road shall be imposed during the platting` process, 46 An 0 foot masonry/wood fence bust be erected along the southern property line on Shady shores Road. 5. Trees shall be planted *very twenty (20) feet along the eastern and northern boundaries of the property betwe4tn this''proposal and the proposed sC•7 and one sore estate lots, 4. Setbacks shall be as tollowas rronte 15 feet tear f 10 loot 8id*I d feet 7. Maxirn'40 lot coverage allowed will be 40 percent. a. No building, dwelling* structure, or fences shall be built or placed on a lot without the approval of the Howeowners' Association. 9. Any dwelling which is eceoied or placed on a lot shall contain at least 900 square feet of living spac,-4, shall have a roof with at least a 3/12 pitch, shall have a shingle roof (no metal or gravel)# and shall have wood or masonry exterior (no metal). 10. Any dwelling which is erected or placed on a Tot shall "(a) be set at a distance of not more than 25 feet and not iass than 15 loot from the street unless such placement is impossible due to utility easements, (b) be permanently attached to a concrete foundation# and (c) be finished or skirted to the ground with a material which is color coordinated with th* dwalling. The exact plaoemont of any dwelling or building on any lot shall first be approved by the Roseowners' Association. it y~ f r 5 A ~J fi:.gy, r ~ Nla~ta. ~Idpt.«ia.a 2i, 1l~f Palo is li. All lots will be, landscaped with grass, shrubs, trees, dsooiattve stone, bark, or other material designed for landscapinq. The landsooping shall at aht times be Maintained, which maintenance shall include (a) regular Mowing and watering o9 grass, (b) raking leaves, (o) trimming trees and shrubs, (d) edging aionp,road, conOrste and shrub beds, (e) trimming along buildinos► and (f) sweeping and cleaning walks and drives. 12. No trash, debris, auto parts, tools, equipment, vehicler► bioyales, or toys shall be kept on any lot within view of the street or within view of adjacent property. 13. No antenna 'may be installed on any lot which extends for gore than 15 feet above the dwelling. le. No person may live on or about any lot for More than 30 days in any twelve month period unless said person is the owner of the lot or a member of the immediate family of the owner of the lot. No renting) 15. All structures on any lot shall be kept in good repair. 16. Any fence constructed "on any lot shall be of wood or oaschry, shall not exceed six feet in height, and `hall be no closer than 30 feet to the street, 17. No towels, rugs, or laundry shall be hung on or about any lot in such a manner that is visible from the street. 18. No more than two four-legged pets may be kept on any lot. The owner of each lot shall keep his pets on his property and shall insure that the pets stay off of the common areas. 19. if steps are required to enter the dwelling and the steps are visible from the street, then the steps must be made of concrete or masunry. Alternatively, a wooden dock arrangement may be used which has as part of its structure stop: which are made of wood, r provided that the deck has at least 80 square fast of !look area and provided, further, that the deck arrangesent be built in a good workmanlike manner with materials designed for outride use. Otherwise, no wooden steps are permitted. f x ~ t Niawls~+~ September 240 1041 Palo 17 j 204 The owner of each lot, his f4mily► and his guests, shall at all times comply With the,$e covenants and restrictions, and shall likewise comply with all rules which the uomeowners, Association adopts. Seconded by Kro sidoc and serried 6-10 (Mc. Duren voted Go Recommend approval of the final replat of the osnt Oaks Addition# 'looks I and it, No Recommend approval of the final replat of solar way Addition, Sections 1 and I10 IV. Considerations A. Me"ke a recommendation to the city Council on a request for a change in xoniho from the'agricultuxal (A) e146si- ficatign to the planned dsvolopte"t. (PO) classification for'ligbt industrial (41) 4606 on a 1$044 sore treat located at the southeast oornoc of Jim Christal Road and Masch branch Road (3-164e)'. u. Appeoranoe by Jose* Co-,fey to address the Planning and toning Comoisyion regarding a pi,oposed resolution stating that all lands without development for three (3) or more years become candidates for resoning. C. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat of lot 10 block 1, Calvert Addition. D. Recommend approval of the preliminary replat of lot 2A, block 200 College Addition. S. Aecomsend approv.l of the preliminary plat of North Texas Industrial Packs Phase II# to Recoamend approval of the preliminary plat of iota I and 2► block 1, 'Rayner Subdivision. G. Approval of the final plat of the Mack Canter Addition. r V , I NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP Or THE CITY OF DENTON, TUM AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDY- NANO94 OF THE CITY Qr.DENTON, TEXAS, BY QRDINANC NO, 49.11 AND SAID MAP APPLIES TO $34 ACRES Or LAND $X ATED IN THE JOHN COWAN SUKVEY,° A3 TRACT' N0. 197 DAMN COUNTY TEXAS AND LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SI S, OF LILLIAN MILLER PAPAWAY 590tNNINQ APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET SOUTH OF I§F.RSTATE HIGHWAY 3xE TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASS rICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY "Sr-10" AND 'SF-16" DISTRICT CLASS~I!ICATION ANO USE TO PLANNED DEVUDPMM "PD" CLASSIFICA- TION D USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION 1. - That the Zoning Classification and Use designation Kppli, oabls to all or part of the property daaoribed as Tracts One Two, Three and Four in Exhibit` A" att ohed hereto and made a ppart hereof for all pu'rpaos is hereby changed from Single Family "SF-10" and !'SF-16'' District Classification and Use to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use undor the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That in approving this planned development district ordi- nance, the City Council hereby approves a preliminary site plan showing the general proposed land uses 'within the district. Prior to the ieuance of any building permit for development within the district or part thereof, a 'comprehensive site plan shall be required to be submitted and approved as part of this ordinance in accordance with Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION III. That the development of the property shall be in suhstantial compliance Mith the comprehensive site plan attached hereto and made a part herein for all purposes. SECTION IV. That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use a any building within the planned development district, the following conditions shall be met; 1. The areas` designated for single family "SF-10" and single family SF-16" on the attached comprehensive plan will be developed in accordance with all requirements of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas applicable to districts so zoned. 2. All dwellin#a constructed and located in the area designated ,.or "single family attached" use in the comprehensive plan, attached hereto shall be so dasignad and. constructed so that only the, garage s$ stotage areas or other mimilar accessory'compoaents of the single family dwelling units are attached to other single family dwelling units. Z-1662/JO STORER/PACE 1 SECTION Y,. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in Accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton TAxaa, and with reasonable consideration among other things tiQr the choriater of the district and for its peculiar nuitabi.l.ity or particular uses] and with a view to conserving the value of the, buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the soot appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citisens. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage And spproval, the required public hearings lunh heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of1984. CITY OF DENTOHo TEXAS ATTESTS CITY OF DENTON,'TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LZOAL FORM: JOE D. NORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS r BY: t 2-1682/,10 STORER/PAGE 2 4 i i~ . Mkt sv' 4 t{, li#~ M I~r F' k U il'Vg u 1. moo ,t l; F I E L D H O T E S (S.F, DETACHED) All (that'certain 17.648 Acre tract or parcel of land situated in the John McGowan Survey, ~kbstract Number 797, Denton County, Texas; said tract being more particularly described as follows: Beginning for the southwest corner of this tract at the southeast right-of-way of Ridgeway Drive and the south line (extended East) of South ridge II; Thence North 28 degrees 49 minutes 03 seoonds,East with said right-o£-wa, a distance of 1153.57 feet to a point th6 northeast corner of this tract; Thoke southeast' Iy with a ou.tve to the left having a radius of PrI 904'55 feet (chord bearing South 76 448t*es 14 minutes 31 reconds East) a distance or 475.50 feet to end of curve; Thence North 68 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 68.14 feet to a point, for the northeast corner of this tract; Thence South 02 degrees 04 mittit:cea 25 seconds East a distance of 875.24 feet to a point, for the southeast corner of this tract; Thence South 88 deggrees 40 minutes 15 seconds West with said extended south line of Southridge It a distance of 1112.70 feet to Point of .Beginning. • Z-1682/EXHIBIT "A"/PAGE 1 OF 4 rY: t P a', Nn r `M.,,++ty~l'. i T 't~ rs ;'i; 1ittzQ.v..,r- ^T'~yl*+"R! iiM t~~MYMAI~~ i F'I'ELD N91 (S.F. ATTACHED, S. OF SOUIVIZDGZ DR,) All that certain 4:460 apr+e tract "or"Parcel of land situated in the John 'McGowan Survey,Abotiict Numbor 797, Denton County, Texasi said ` tract being more particularly described as follows. Beginning for the northoast corner of this tract at the intersection of south right-of-gray Southridge Drive and the west right-of-way of Ridgeway drive; Thence South 28 degrees 49 minutes 03 seconds West with said west right-of-wayy of Ridgeway Drive a distance of 803,27 feet to.a corner in the south line of Ridgeway II (extended East) for southeast corner of this tracts Thence South 88 degrees 40 minutes 12 seconds West with said extended, south line a distance of 237,18`feet to the southeast corner of said Southridge II, for the southwest corner of this tract; Thence with the southeast boundary line of said Southridge II, the following (6) calls: North 035 9 g 18 Otootes 08 seconds East 219,57 feet, degrees 19 mhWtii 45 seconds West 250,00 feet, North 55 degrees 06 minutes 30 seconds East 156,25 fw)et, North 57 degre-s 50 minutes 28 seconds East 169.57 feet, North 51 degrees 42 minutes 01 seconds East 200,34 feet and North 37 degrees 26 minutes 56 seconds East 126.45 feet to a point in said south right-of-way of Southridge Drive; 'T'hence southeaster) with a curve to the left having a radius of 330,00 feet (chord Baring South 59 degrees 54 minutes 34 seconds East) and said right-of-way, a distance of 14,66 feet to end of curve; Thence South 61 degrees 10 minutes 57 seconds East with said right-of-way a distance of 71,64 feet to Point of Beginning, Z-1682/EXHIBIT "A"/PAGE 2 OF 4 r i r I, K n,^"°'.xq...+-*}"`o'aen?s'S'""°z~ f +~±€...re~ w s, r ell. P .i a ~OUtKric~e E: f. IELU N0TE8 (SF•16) 4 01 aoxe Croat or ppttresI of land situated in the All that Pertain $40 1 AbsractDek'797, nenbbtti County, xexas3 said John mcdowan Survey,. tract being more particularly described as (allows Beginningg for the northwest corner of this tract at the northwest corhor of Southrl.dge II Addition, said corner is also an inside all corner of $outhridge Addition to the City of Denton; Thence with the northwest boundary fine of said Southridge II the following (7) calls South 69 degrees 58 minutes 28,seconds East 252,27 feet, South 76 degrees 4 minutes 28 seconds East 116.70 feet, South .82 de tress 0 minutes 26 second; East 115.13 feet, North 86 a ress $6 ,m tut s 32 sic'pods test 294'.,87 feet, North" 69 * woos. 52 m 'nOtss 25 seconds East 279, d6 feet, North 6 do re6s 34 mijt44i 49 9eco0ds East 2 3.63 feet, and North. 45 dii revs 17 mihwto# 17 seconds fast 132463' f64t to a point in'the,South `ri`ht-of way of Southridge Drive, for the northeast corner of this tract; Thence South 38 degrees 05 minutes 14 seconds East with said right of way a distance of 149.99 feet to a point, for the southeast corner of this tract; Thence South 50 degrees 37 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 197,34 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of i069.36 feet (chord beating South 65 degrees 13 minutes 35 seconds West) ; Thence 'southwesterly with said curve a distance of 545.00 feet to the beginning of a curve to'bhe right having a radius of 1225.00 feet (chord bearing North 85 degrees 28 minutes 42 seconds West); Thence northwesterly with said curve a distance of 628,37 feet to end of said curve; Thence North 70 degrees 47 minutes West a distance of 220.10 feet to a point for the southwest corner of this tract; Thence North 24 degrees 05 minutes 06 seconds East a distance of 144.82 feet to Point of Beginning. Z-1682/EXHIBIT "A"/PAGE 3 OF 4 ~ _r 777; 77"r- f^".."1a"~'.~r','r'--..... tt (S , F , ATTACHED , N , OF 800ftna D11, ) All that 'certain 5.211 acre tract or &toel o! land; situated in the John Madowan Survey, Abstraot Number 707 D"ton Cotimty, Texas, said tract being more partidularly described as follows: Beginning for the southeast corner of this tract at the intersection' of the north tight-of-way of Jouthridge Drive and the west right-of-way of Ridgeway Drive; Thence North 61 de reps 10 minutes 57 seconds West with the north right-of-way of said Southridge Drive 71.64 foot to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence northwosterly with a curve to the right hsvift a radi%h of 270,00 feet (chord bear$zj North 42 de Ns 25 stizutes 16 seconds West), and said north right-of-way of Iovthrtdge Drive a distance of 176,82 feet to a point for and of curvet Thence North 23 degrees 39 ikt utes 35 seconds Vast with said right of way a distance of 78.10 fort; Thence northw4rterl.yy with a curve to the riot having a'radius of 58.3,04 foot (chord'beartog North 25 degrees $6 minutes 45 seconds West), and said right-of-way, a distance of 46.54 feet to the south- west corner of this tract;. Thence North 50 degrees 37 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 343,55 feet to an angle poitit of this tract; Thence North 35 degrees 07 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 350.82 feet to an angle point of this tract; Thence North 10 degrees 18 minutes 39 seconds West a distance of 195.14 feet to the northwest corner of this tract; Thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 11 seconds. East a distance of 215.07 feet to the said west right-of-way of Ridgeway Drive for the northeast corner of this tract; Thence South 00 degrees 30 minutes 27 seconds East with said right of way a distance of 3,95 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right havingg a radius of 753„26 feet (chord bearing South 13 degrees 39 minutes 24 seconds Nest); Thence southwesterly with said curve a distance of 398.62 feet to end of said curve; Thence South 28 degrees 49 minutes 03 seconds West continuing with said right-of-way a distance of 670,00 feet to Point of Beginning. 2-1682/EXHIBIT "A"/PAGE 4 OF 4 q 'CONCUI~''r RAN 14ADL F ,Meta ZONE awe, rv 36.2 SF- 10 I(.1'S LA A► 2; 7 L9, 3F f6 32 I's SF•Arrkwtn 40, IJWH a. N 1716 gF • acp~c.►+rro 106 G.0 4~ o 5 F' , - JUNE ~ 9!! 4 a S. F4 16 N ~y Ia q LOCATION MAP 1" zaaa 1 ea t ' 1~rv • jff 7 AN WINAOC Y A Ps C O CT ;t11~tSt1A , of '0 "OD C PftWISILS tt?~OX - IE CITY . of . 7 a As SAID DIar11 CT AF ICS TO APPXOX%HAT4 5V6~~1o 1744 S F 3J1Np, NWtt qU S OUT Of TRZ COLORADOT b0U1.0 A?ft VIATEELY 4 500 FEET ~NO ITHMEESTx OF SID LOOP 288s • AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TLUS, HMZBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. That the axisting planood development district toning ordi- nonce applicable to all or port of the property described as Tract I in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof for. al purposes,.hsviag been previously designated as a Planned Development District ,undlr the 'provifiod$ of. ordinar,t• No. 81.111,'paosdd and approved on the 15th da of December, 198.1, in accordance with the VOVis ons of Article 11, Appendix D-Zonin` of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is`here by 'amended a set forth herein SECTION 110 The conditions and restriotions applicable to the property is posed by Ordinance No. 81-111 are horoby superooded by the following conditions; 1. The location of tributary 9 to Pecan Creek where the same abuts the east side of Phase I of Township' 11 shall not be alterod except to provide for necessary drainair It is further provided that single family lots shall begin no closer than forty (40) feet east of the conterline of the existing creek. 2. In both Phase 11 and Phase I11, the development of the single family (80 X 1201 typical lot size) area shall precede or be concurrent with the development of the single family cluster housing. 3. Prior to or at the beginning of development of Phase II, but in no case later than sixty (60) days' after the issuance of a quitclaim deed by the City of Denton, the developer shall remove the existing paving, of San Gabriel Drive from the point where it intersects Angelina bend Drive to the point where it intersects the cluster housing'in the Phase 11 area. 4. The developer shall landscape all disturbed areas of the greenbelt as part of the development '?hoses it and 111. 5. Piney Creek Houlevi►rd shall be re-opened for public use. 6, Minimum 30 foot front, 7 foot side, and 10 foot rear yard setbacks shall be requl.red in the single family uses as shown on the attached site plan. Z-1674/JO STOUR/PACE 1 ,4^.'4. 'rTx 4~@a~an+R"-r+-wrwY!a'w^.r,+"M!e •a~r, -„ilr--'+n+R.". 1VP~ y' i,f + `-:N J 7% 7. Sptatfic tit«' plan approval Rust W gr4atK1 tar c ester 40uota` areas is Phase It Rod Phase III qmiss to final plat approval and issuance of buildias permitoS. Developer shall be required to irprovo ooo half of Colorado boulevard to the NKT Railroad track. 9. Developar shall install a 1011 sewer line from her development up Woodrow Lane to the Pecan Creek twin interceptor lines. SEU100 lilt That the comprehensive site plan for the Planned Development Dintrict approved and adopted by Ordinance No. 81»111, applicable to the hsrlain described property, is hereby amended in accocdouce with the 0.(aprohonsive site plan attached horato cad the use of said propbrtty shall be hereafter in accordance with such amended site plea. S C bN V. _ That the City Council of the City of Dodtoa, texas, hereby finds that such change is in aecordaaoe with a oobprehaaaive p, an for the purpose of promoting the toners; 'welfare of the City of Denton Texas, and with uuoaabla coatider~kion, awing other things lo, the character of the distr of std for its peculiar su3tabi~ity or particular useat and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting husuwn lives, and encouraging the moat appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citisens. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediatel after its passage and a proval, the required public hearings hy aving heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the • day of 1984. RICHARD 04 5Ttw^K,Fj mAruiK CITY OF DENTON,'TEXAS ATTEST: MMOTTE CITY SEURTARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: L ;Nw Z-1674/30 STORER/PAGE 2 , ,~~'nG z ~~y^ y., trv'P'tlA v wrY '~•P.i ...,9f 'Y ZK' Wit 110 1- 04' ¢UAVtY0a0 001 9Y 41 ! IM . uet'C++tn SC '0171 a trios q~ IRIOA ay #d 94w. AbstrAot Nu sNir.,14 . ON AS t. SudWY 0t P4 in Abf~p 4cC Ntsh►bar 4, !n the Sout4. Cdr A.~Mt q wntcqqTruCaus►t;r,, Texae, and b~ t pe~irk 0 la e' . byy~t a a- man) stee to Denton Ra 1A6i11t4yyddt !IQ Y 79 4 t e records and of raoott;4 in VolWh4 91E, p 'a; .6 3 se;; al+a, th thy; Weat. art of Tract of $414 Coun:y, and;inore specMally bei049 4, of Tract It in Said deed shown on p4sas 30 and 1 to said Volume 966, and this 96,027 acres beins described by slates and bounds as follows: to innin st: the intersection of the West line of Colorado Blvd with the North )lne of said Hopkins Survey, at a point 35,0 feet North 98 d• roes 2) minutes 18 seconds West of the ,Meth North East corner of said ` Veins Survey for the North East cornet of thisl 'Chance S<,,:hoastsrly with the South West line of Colorado Blvd with curve to tae left with a central angle; of 6S. Degvsoo p~ minutes 4o seconds, a radius of 592,49 feet for a curve len th of 673.31 feet (ioi chord south 30 da;Crees 00 minutes 30 sacondS East 637.66 test)' to the end of said curve; Thendo'South 62 dsltroot 40 irinutes 39 seconds .East 926.30 feat with the South West line of Colorado blvd to the begitmint'of a curve to the right; Thence with'the South West liM of "'Id Colorado 1 .with "Wd 44tve to.thi`r€ ht'2. h a central anRle;:of 22 degreeS 2 .k1' u loo }5 seconds, a radius of 1 ,79 feet for a curve 144th of 479 ` set, (long chord South '.1 dogre s 2; minutes 09 seconds East 476.75 feet), to the end of said curve, Thence South 40 degrees ll,.minutes 39, seconds EA#t 160.00 root with the South West line of Colorado ho an ang to in said Colorado Blvd South West line, CrlorAdo being 70 feet wide at this points Thence South 28 degrees 53 rainuta 03 seconds East 152,97 feet with the South West line of Colorado Blvd to a point where Coloesdo Is 100 feet wide, „t, the North corner of Commercial Tract 2, as shown in Volume 986, 1)ape 940, in the deed records of said county, for the East corner of tl•.;.s; Thence with Che North litre of said Commercial Tract 2 as follows, South 49 def,rees 48 minutes 21 seconds West 365.86 feet to the be- ginning of s. curve to the right, and with said ourvG with a central angle to 12 degrees 49 minucas 01 seconds a radius of 660.0 feet, for a curve tens,k:h of 147,64 feet (long chord South 56 degrees 12 minutes it seconds Vast 147,.13 feet) to the and of said curve, and South 92 degrees .i) minutes) 21 seconds West 339.87 feet to the East corner ) a 123082 aar.e'tract deeded by )enton Residential N.V. to Township 2 Estates i,,v by deed dated April 4, 1980 and of record in Volume 1013. pare 572, in the deed records of said county, for the South corner of this; Thence with the East and North liner of said 12,3002 acre tract as folloVs~ North 27 degrees 22 minutes 39 seconds Wast 190,0 rest to s point, South 62 d groes 31 minutes 21 ;saoonds WOO 28,0 feet, to a point, Kurth 21 de;trses 22 minutes 39 seconds Wset $5.0 E'foot, to a point, North 01 de;;ree 55 minutes 23 seconds East 346. IS to a point, North 79 ds;ross 17 minutes 33 seconds West 229.3qq feet to a point, and South 87 degrees 54 minutes 15'seconds West 500,Ob foot to the Northerly eOrth West :3rner of said 12,S062 acres in the East line of Township 11 Phase I as shown by plat of' record in'Vol+nme 9, page 38, in the plot records of said county, page 1 of 3 pages, 56,027 at and 12,540 ao. AM Uat, 410 North U*As at WA 2#VWhy' ti !1 ~4'4w #4dd8 Fiver, 09 "041146 1S ieesado tact 2$1,19 ENt to 4 found tb 'd a 01, N~inwt*s 10 aadonda vast 164031, feet , aroacine llpe• y NO=-Ix 6 ~3i4tda 44 croon a Waat ;9o fit, Nor, h 83 LIR014 44616 3 **,Out*$ 43 sMOOa I aot 26 l/4t, atrossin4 tAko'rukv% e4 • foundlrea ppin, South ;.77 degrees m nuts $5 $econds hest 234,99 feet to a found i>foa piK South, 80, do8rees 30 minutes 12 seconds West 74.82 feet to a found iron P< , Souttl,, d• revs 18 minutes 19 seconds West 145,86 feet to a fo an~ und iron "p n , North' 6 desreas 54 minutes 13 seconds West 334.40 feet to a found iron pin on the East line of San Gabriel Drivel 't'hence Norti 01 dep,,teea 32 mintea 03 second* list 50,0 foot with the East 1i.no of San Gabriel and East and of Piping hook Lane to a found iron Pini Thence North 88 degrees 48 minutes 33 seconds West 21S,19 feet with the North Ilne of Piping Rook Lano to a found iron pin aR the South East corner of 31ock £ ppf the Hopkins Hills Addition, for Western South Test oorner of this, oa with he Last line of said Nopkiae 1{i .18 Additt" as follow Ne th 01 doltree 09 minutes 25 $stood$ Kist 146. S9 feet to a tboV4 iron '.pno~rth 69 c~etcroes 26 minutes 14 saoonds Last 17.55 test to a towns iron Borth 01 dirrrae 13 minutes 11 soconda Kest 149.86 foot to a found iron ppiA at th;.Trth East corner of said 616ok E on the South line of Hapki Drll?ss South 8 do ees,17 minutes 14 :"*We ecoads Last 5.97 feet to a found iron pin at the .rouch East corner of Hopkins Drive and rth01 degrees 07,minutes h2 East 716.66 fast to the North line of the Hopkins Survey fnr North host corner of thief Thence South 88 degrees 29't4inutes 18 seconds East U69.40 feet with fence to the place of beginning. All of that ctrtain<12.540 acres of land, a pavt'of the R X Hopkins Survey Abstzact. Number 1694, in the South East part of.ths City of Denton, in Denton County, Taxes, and baing the idantioal property con- veYd as 12,5082 acres in the dead from Denton Residential N, V, to Township 2 Estates N.V. dated April 21, 1980 and of record in Volume 1013, page 572, in the deed records of said countyy and this tract being described from a survey on the ground as to wet Be irmi at the point ofinersection of the Northerly lino of San CA riot de nee, (a 60.0 feet row) with. the East line of Aa&alina bend Drive (a 50,0 feet sow) at the South West corner of the above ioeritioned 12.5082 acres, for the South West corner of this; Thonda with the East lies cf Angelina Send Drive North 17 degreas.37 minutes 52 sec6Aos gist 89,69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the ses++ 21 Minutes left, and with slid curve, with a central ands of 13,d* 55 seconds, a radius of 80,49 feet , for a curve 1 th'af 1,91,39 feet (long chord North 30 dagroei 46 minutes 42 words East 196.46 fast), to a found iron pin at a corner of Township It ?has* 1. shown'in Volume 9, pate 3e,'in the plat records of said County; Thence with a South, and Sant Liza, of said Towmshi~ It Phase I, as follows; South 87 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconda Last 130.59 fast, and North 02 d6grMe 09, minutes 15 seconds East 390,0 feat to the Nero, pest co,-ner, of said former 12,5082 acres far North West corner of this; Therca with the North and last linab of said for1w 12,5662 rore+ rr latieMe, Paso 2 of 3 pars, 57.962 so. attd,i2.640 ae ' tom,; axe yf.r.."i 'f" i~+ r 5Tfi" h,., Tv rf`{9' ~gi 5 ^ flc }T ~ f~S rl ,n"ci~+ }ti li .~~~al Jul ~,U!"!1 191 r' ' t rep , , ~ r S « kaR'i ~agpo tie«taea Iant~ and ed t Ooilat" ifn Ea A t eraat 2 describ i, ` 00 in tM dNd records0 OAtd~c~OWtttjr,' i RQ~t eerrgaar of e~ Th•naehe 1bqVO ligi'ef a id Qcsri•roial Tract 2 south 62 degrees tract 2, en c 37 Minutes 2f sRaoitest;J3l,~ feet to the West oorn•r of the h at line of May Creek Drive, a 100 fe wed l atrast, for t south corner of this, Thanes North 21 diyttaea 22 p~nl►C•• 39 seconds West 130.0 tent with the North !Cast Iine of Piney croak to a Drive; ovth lost lino of San Oabriet Thenoe North 62 degraee 37 Mit~ utes 21 seconds East 9,5 feet to ' East corner of San O'~abriel Drive, the Theme North 27 deira i 22 minutes 39 seconds Wb.t 60,0 feet with the fast and of San Gabriel to a North corner of same; Thence South 62 dq~rasa 37 degrees 21'seconds West 109.40 feet with the North line of lap drbrisl to the beginning of a curve to the right in the North line of some-, Thence with the #bTth:;line of son 4abri•1 Mith said",cWtvs with ben Eeot1•eof J4Ra 20i ae 40 aaaanae 79a;~s for , a rediys of40. '41; of .1~ :eat, (land sherd"SauCh dues 06 rd~btit;i 4f , e ' ti6st Ocs fast) , to, t s 'end .of 444 cu end thst''b of 'another oiiv to the t~iAht'with a antra angle of 07 d. ~a 6 stioutes 20 s4oonds,;a radius of 1026.82 f curve l4`yth o1J.31 fast (I tot for a cu sea ons chord North 79 'de rte. 14 !minutes to Coe in $40 acres of , 51 :6 ll et l3 .Z2 t3et to the place of btsinn na one calculated The ' 'eiiMd doss hereby certify that the Plat `hereon 'i-o breed on an Actual survey, *Adt on the 'ground this data, and that tt ii a true; correct and aaeurate representation of the property as surveyed,' the li r and dloonstons of the ropt art the size, buds # , location and type of ni i0pro oments, 4 pnd,.ha there are no visible cnorOachmtnts. visible 40 licto, visible io sea$$$pt• axceppt a shown on said pplc, or any said paaror ort aeoees y has II to a ubl ia rood, and that he has accurately calculated the ggantity of land shown therein. ti ya+y C. 44 ,~„JOY..b ........t.. Joy C, Crean 179r r Public Surveyor No, 1797 October 10, 1903 paps 3 of 3 pains, 57.962 aC and 12 f40 ac. IPIr11 M~'YM M NI•N war Mvwrs • Y I}t 40 4~ IwMM 446 Y / 4 It wool 1r ~ I a~ J ~ f I I 1 ~ /1, ~ j I N~•', . I 4.1 yi11 1 y11r ww4w } y' ! / MSS 1 r'- per: -"r,.rr.. .r ~ _ 1 i ~r -r..r _f r, r not AN ORDINANCE AMD Nq THE ZONINQ MAP 06 THE 'CITY Of DENTON MUS AS SAME WAS A WI FD A0 AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF 01t 14NCES ' 01 THE CITY OF DENT N, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE N04 69.1 AND AA8 SAID MAP APPLIES TO 52.9 ACRES Ol LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTH91 S'S CORNER OF BONNIE BRAE AND PAYNE DRIVE AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO 1'ROYIUE FOR A VHAOiZ IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM 3RICULTI►RAL ~'A~ DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "P411 CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EMOTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION 1. That the zoning classification and use designation of the following desoribsd property, to-wit: All that certain tract or parosl of land situated in the Trances Batson Survey, Ab4traot No. 43, Denton Count~yy, Texas, being the aaae $2.98 Acre :tract oonveyed by J. A. Oladish at ux to w.- C. Collier on November 15,1951, recorded in Volume 374, Page 6090 Deed Records of sail County s:nd being more particularly deicribed as follows: n4IN1.4IN4 at the `northeast corner of said do) liar tract in the middle of a`publio road; THENCE south OW wesw with the middle of said road and the east line of said Batson Sutvay 1145.38 feet to a point in said road; THENCE north 87025' west with a fence most of the way 1200.81 feet to a'fence corner; THENCE north 2°13' east with a fence 95.7 feat to a fence corner; THENCE north 87°23' west with a fence 899.06 feet to a fence corner, THENCE north 2°06' east with a fence most t•f the way 1041,19 feet to a point in the middle of an east-wc,st pubic road; THENCE south 87°38' east with the middle of said public road 2095.96 feet to the place of beginning, containing in all 52.986 acres of land. is hereby changed from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use designation to Planned Development "PD" Classification and Use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas. SECTION II. That in approving this planned development district ordinance, the City 6ouo tl hereby approves the comprehensive site plan for the areas designated for single-family "SF-7" use as shown on the attached site plan and designated as Blocks A and b therein. SECTION III. That in approving the planned development district ordinance, the City Council hereby aproves the preliminary site plan,ahowing the proposed land user witran the areas designated as Blocks C and D for taro lot line use, Blooks E and F for multL-family (10 acrea) use, Block H for neighborhood service (6.32 `acres) and Blocks F and G for multifamily use (14.9 acres). Prior to the issuance of any building permit for development. of those uses listed in this Seotion 111, a comprehensive site pla,ti shall be required to be submitted and approved as part of this ordinance in accordanoe with Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. s ..x.~T... ; ; r , 7, -7- 1 V r SECTION IV. That prior to lssuano♦ of any certificate of occupancy for the use oL` Any building within the planned development district, the following conditions shall be meti 1. Electrical service shall be underground except for major trans- mission lines. 2. That all regulations of Appendix g-Zoning of the Code of Ordi- nancea applicable to single-family 'W-7' districts vhall apply to the site plan designated for single-family "SF-7' land use, unless otherwise spaoifically stated herein. 1. That in the area designated on the site plan attached hereto as "Neighborhood Service there shall be no sales of alcoholic beverages, either for on or off-promise consumption. 4. That in the area designated on the site plan attached hereto as 'Neighborhood Service' there shall be no 'gasoline service stations permitted or motor fuel dispensing pumps or devices of any kind. SECTION V. That the development of the property shall be in substantial compliance with the site plate attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Zoning Map of the City of .Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of Januory, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No, 69.1, be and the sacks is hereby amended to .1how such ohanEe in District Ciassifica- tion and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications. SECTION VI. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the CLty of Denton, Texas and with reasonable conaideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or pparticular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildinga, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of Land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION VII. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immedi- ately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. 910MM 0, , MAYOK CITY OF DENTON, TEAS ATTEST: CHMME ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTGN, TEXAS By: V o~ Q t1Mr1 7 4 c•~y«or N . ~.,«Ir f 1.1 31 +e.,co l1 u4.11 r,..n 1 r IjOrtl I~ rnl a aflnlr ~ f',. f un l:. all l~tn 1I f+. r 1 t ~ i.l l . 11 S r ' !~.~~gp~,rtt+~f l 'll',I \ ~ X11 ,I \ 1 I rr 1 1 I ~ I 1 •t .,.I. a e' t ,1.. y ' ~ 11 r ++~elb. _ >4at t - tI- _ v ~,I.v. JI • Lit II•° ~ ~ 0~ ~ rl ._y II ) t.l 1 ~ I i ~ \ '4 I _ t I 11 1 r- l l ..L_ ' _ ~ IN (-i 'sl_ Ni I __I-_' y I{411a~,1. 11141 •+I i... ,i•.. N ♦ f 1 II VV y.1. I ( 000 0, 'L ♦ f.J. e II tP ~ W N 1w~lu 1 .tl I11 1W111I .~;s,'. I 1 if, tr__L ~ I i et,1t I u.w. I'f f .l 10W -0 1 t. (L.l. tlLC_at .l ~a~.v`Zif.V~, le. ai tif+_+ P.tt ;1 t~~'~.•: -.'t A]'" nrs;m-r1••rrv tn~- 1 '~d`~ ' 7; -71 R. i r No. AN ORDINANCE REY 04 AXTICLI It OF CWTER 2S Or TU CODE OF ORDIA Oagog$ KNAAOT 4 Es To Or 01101 A W OR I 1SSA1LgK2l " 2SO THE COD ODE huTt$suvid myoRDf,NA~.ai mo oidatt~irricTiivvi DAlTE. j I.ECICAha' THE COMM Or T.Nhi CITY Or DXWON, TF.XAB, FI OY OMIN81 SEC~ON Il, 'That Article It of Chapter 25 'of the Code of Ordinances is hereby tepe4led in its entirety. SH (elf It. Tha'c a new Article It of Chapter 25 of the Coda of Ordiaeaces is hereby enacted which 'shall read as followss ARTICIX it. tt.tC''MIIC SUVICZ S", 25-21, The, rates, oholao , fees, ddpo;its billings and procedures for providial electrical service b the City to Its custowts $hall be established and be in adCordtooe with ordiddac*a adopted; and is from tise-to-time a"464, br the City Council, the ordiaa css , and amendments thereto to be kept on file with the. City Secretary and' to be available for inapeotioa by the public during resular business hours. SECTION 111. That this ordinance shall become effective when the ordinance adopted pursuant to Sactioo 11, above, becomes effective, a copy of which shall be attached hereto. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ____day of , 1984. RICWD 0. STEWART, WO CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS To LEGAL FORM: 'Y ATTORNEY C Y 0!' D16NTON, TLW r ^ I• 5 ~rrc ti° f'A5^."~SR.9lF4'^T'!14!^y V 4, ..iv 'ra f '~i7f- nP r7. 7J771777 1 _ 1. x7" .7` , , 7 1` •f :r Ao NdA If r~ CITY 11A,64, SUBJECT: Cpfnsidex Proposed Electric Rate Ordinance. SUMMARY: For the past five monthsl the Utility Staff has been roodueting an inr-house, study of the eie4trio rates. An ~,iecutive summary of 'the study is attached and a copy of the study was included with the Council Agenda packet foi, the Council's October 2, 1984, meeting, The study provides background for an electric rate increase of about 15.8%4 The 1984 EleotriC'Rate Study was developed using the Uilbert Associates Cast of Service model developed for the City of Uenton. The new rates are designed in a mahner so as to attempt only to additionAlly recover the cost 'which now is reflected in the Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) rates.- The rate categories have not been changed. FISCAL SUMMARY: Present Rates Proposed Revenue Percent 19.8.3.84_ECN Rates a_E.CA Increase Increase - 1964o,85 FY Expected Revenues $42,677,000 $49,420,000 $6,743,000 15.8% ACTION REQUIRED: 1. Approval of Rates; This will allow the Department of Utilities to continue to operate in an efficient manner with sufficient funds to meet its obligation through the 1984-85 fiscal year, 2. Rejection of Rates: This will cause a slightly larger increase for electric customers than is presently anticipated in the proposed rates, RE UDMMENDA f ION : The Public Utiiities Board unanimously recommends the proposed rates for adoption by the City Council. The Board made their, recommendation at their meeting of September 25, 1984. Respectfuily, R. E.„Nelson Uirector of Utilities EXHIBIT I' Executive Summary- 1984-Rate Study I Proposed Ordinance- a ctric Rates III Minutes PUB, Meeting o 9/25/84 32100 r 'Nu O ? 66LIC,"U'T:" LIlIE5" dA~tq MEETtoo September 26, 19$4 6:00 PM Civil Defense 'Room Members Present: Roland Laney, Chairman; t,eonard Herring, Edward Coomes, Nancy Boyd, John Thompson Staff Present: R, E, Nelson, Ernie Tuiios, David Hang, Charles Cryan, John Mcilrane Others: Jon Waist, Denton Record Chronicle Absent: G. Chris Hartung 1. CONSIDER UTILITY'RATES; Herring 'made a motion,to recommend p, o ose u y ates as amb'nded to' the City Council Thompson second, Five ayes, no neyes,'motion carried. The Boa'ed'adjourned at 04,0 PM to 'the ' City Council CMiamb'ers for a Joint City Council/Public Uti'l'ities Board meeting. MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING September 25, 1984 7:00 PM City Council Chambers Present: Mayor Stewart and Members of the City Council G, Chris Hartung ,Public Utilities Board members and 'Staff I Jon Waist- Denton Record Chronicle 1. CONSIDER ISSUANCE OF CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE OUNU4; u es oar m m r, y made a motion to recommend to the Council acceptance of the bid of Raucher Pierce, at al, at 10,2966% average 'i'nterest rate for $20 million of Utility Revenue Bonds. Thompson second, five ayes, no nayes, motion carried. The above recommendation was presented to the Council by Chairman Laney. The Board then adJourned from the Council meeting at 7:45 PM. 32710 r r 7 4: ~x~cuYrvc ~ui~Ahv 1984 Electric t W ter RAte Study A policy 'developed by the Public Utilities Board and City 0uuncil in 1961 recommends annual review of utility rates. Such a review `snould`determine (1) whether existing rates will pay for all uparating costs, capital ousts and debt service and transfers to general government, (2) wnatne, economic and/or system efficiencies may be obtained from restructuring the rates, and (3) wnether the rates capture customer cost of service, The staff has reviewed the existing rates and other available information to provide tree Board and uouncil wits) the bacKup for rate changes. As the Council and Board are aware, all utility service rates were increased in tne`1983-84 fiscal year. Tne electric rates c8.me into effect in Nuvemuer and water and sewer rates in March, At the beginning of 1983-84, staff had estimated system growth at four (4Si) percent for electric and three and one-i)alf `(3,j%) percent for water and sewer. These estimates produced expected Sales of 533 millsun kilowatt nuurs of energy afrd x.81 uillioli gallons of water. Actual figures new for 198s-84 indicate energy sales of about 584 miiilun Kiluwatt nuu,s and water sales of 3,08 uiil.Lon gallons. System growth nas, tnerefure, been over 145 for electric and about 14X F'Ur water. These additional sales nave improved substantially the financial position of the Denton Utilities. Une oenefit of toe increase in water sales is a net gain of $171,000 for the water and wastewater services rather than a net loss of $974,000 as projected when rates were increased oarlier this year. A second positive result is tnat wastewater rates will not generally increase althougn some specific increases are necessary such as the rate for industrial water. A third benefit of the increase in customer use is a reduction in the cost per Kiiowatt-hour of the Texas Municipal Power Agency (T4PA) fixed cost from wnat would have been auuut ).8 cents eased on 4% growth as compared to the prupused 3.5 cents per KWH eased on current pro,jectiuns. ~~00U Sbth ,the el'actric ahd water rate review; h4ve : rM2,4e0 hdaivily ah the Gilbert Uaet»ot»Service studies prepared wi'toin the Post 'y'ear. the 'water rate changes result in an increase` of about lOo6% over current rates raising tiffs average cost par 1,UO0 gallons from about $1.63 to about $1.8u. The electric rate changes increase the average cost per kilowatt nour from aoout 7,U36 per KWH to about 8,14e per KWH for an average increase of 15.8%. Four changes are proposed for the electric rates, 1)' Removal of the 4,5d/KWH of fuel and purchased power from the oase energy rate, place TAP A's $210272;OUJ net fixed costs in the ba't'e eliar gy rate, wnion represents per KWH, (Exhibit VILL . s) Place all variaula, fuel and ppurchased 'power costs in toe energy oust adjustment (uCA) ahdz,ge, (Nis cost would include only 'the variable `mining casts from TMPA, all fuel purona'sas and all power purchased through economic dispatch), 4) Estaalish a s(I(Omer 'and winter energy cost ad, ustment reflactingg ac$sjal variable costs per 'KWH for each season uhioil will result in a winter (Nov-April EUA of 2.256 per KWH and a summer (May -October) EGA of 2, 750 per KWH (Exhibit IX). The need for a rate change for electric service arises not frum a need to generate additional funds, rather to re-allocate the rates to reflect changes in the fixed and variable structure of system costs. The rate proposal will actually reduce the cost to the ratepayer sligntly over what would now be collected from present rates and EcA pass tnroughs. (See Electric Pro Forma, Exiii0it I:) A summary of the proposed rates (Exhibit I), and the relative cost increase anticipated (Exnioit 111) show tine effect on the various customer classes. A review of the Water Pro Forma (Exhibit XII) demonstrates the need fur allditionai revenues. m e current rates would leave the 41r 11.77 T7 7977~Tv 77-" i i $00LOe ibOOt $v95 "600 'siinrt f ~aaetino axpanditu a requjlxaNient• for the fiscal 'year. "The `ad,jus bd rates will prudw6e a net positive financial position showing'euout $65,000. The rate change consists primarily of about five percent increase on the facility charge and 'an addition of $0.15 per 1,000 'gallons to the volume charge, Tne rate change will account for about $560,000 uf' increased sales revenues (Exhibit XiII), REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Planning Period The planning period used for this atudy is the nistoric data from Fiscal Year 1982-8.) torougn the present and projections for fiscal year 1984.87, The budgeted a'xpenditures for fiscal year 1984-05 are used as too uase fur'reveiiue needed, Sales ~;onsumotion Energy consumption is pru,jected at dbout five (5%) percent increase for FY 1 84.-85 over FY 1983-84, Tois exceeds the ten year historic trend; nowever, evidence of continued growth in O'ignton indicates this is a reasonaula assumption. Water consumption is projected to grow at aoout'tnree and one-half (3.5%) percent, ELECTRIC WATER Sales (GWH) (Million Gals) 062-d3 X06 20698 1983-84 584 3;081 1984-85 60 5,190 Usage_uy Customer `Class Annual volume by rate class based on the past two years of mont icy reports,, EuEOTRIO WATER Heslueiitial 34.6% 4/.9% Uommercial .5969% 49.5% Governmental 4,1% 0ori0tn z.4% Other 18% ,2% 100.u loo-,0 t1 it S' Y^S^ .-.,.•.-m.T'„^v+9:p r--+ ;'F r x I t vY i'i I::rR ~'1 ^ v; NUMbet of Customers Customer growth is measured oy the number of transactions pasting within a rate class each monto, Staff applied a growth rate of 5% for annual electric bills and 3,5% for annual. water bills. 1 1983.84 I I 1)84.65 I I I I ~I Customer Class IElect:ic Water I (Electric eater l Residential 2360872 152,414 2510991 157,942 u0mmerclal 291929 15149ti 30,534 26,387 OoVernment* 10458 12 10517 12 Uther µz163 513 ±121 540 TOTAL 2720422 1780434 2880377 184,881 Water is for. resale Hate Program Uescription' The rate programs are designed to allow for new rate implementation at any time during the fiscal year. It is anticipated that rate study will ue ongoing and oew rates will nurmally coincide witn budget years or be implemented so as to reflect cost for a full fiscal yeai. Other Income Income from sources utner than commodity sales are considered constant assuming tnat changes in other income are nut directly related to revenue generated from commodity sales. Income figures in the pro formas lnciude additional interest from uoud investments (see Deut Service below). New Expenses Both water and electric expenses used for this study reflect the 1984-85 Utility Department uudget. changes from the 1983-84 budget are reflected in increased debt service and interest income due to the issuance of Uonds. (See Exhibit Ii, Elect:ic Pro Forma and Exhibit XII, Water Pro Forma). 7'"'4'r'*""""' .f { OeDt Service, They rete study includes an increase in delit service costs due to the anticipated sale of $200OOU,0OO in Yevenue bonds, Bond proceeds and associated costs will be allocated to Electric Service, $9.5 million, Water Service, $7.5 million and Suwnr Sorvice, $3,0 million. Previous data service is allocated 65% to Electric and 35% to water and Wastewate r, The Watur Service also has a $1,0009000 bond from darlier in this fiscal year, capital Expenditures, included in the budget and in 'the Capital improvement plan lfive;year planning document? are expenditures fur capital projects to oe funded from operating revenues rather than debt. Return on investment Vroosfer Return on investment (RUi) are calculated at a rate of six (e%) percent of net plant in service less all contriouted capital. The Staff assumed a 5U% split uetween water and wastewater for the RO1 for trio current study, A RATE QE$IGN-CLECTRIC 'the prdposed electric rates were desj,'ghed by reallooating customer energy charges, The base energy charge included in the current rates is 4,9 cents per kilowatt nUUr. Tne oase energy has now been reduced to 3,3 cants per KWH (See Exhibit VIII) and all variable energy will be included in the Energy Cost Adjustment ,(ECA). It is furtner p,:oposed to develop the ECA semi-annually for the periods of November through April and May through October (Exnibit IX), With all energy costs covered in the energy portion of the races, only ioedl operating costs, aoot service, non-debt capital and return on investment transfers need be covered by the margin auuve energy. Our previous cost'-of-service study nod allocated margins to oe covered uy either demand or facility c,)arges. There are'_o o projected changes in tine facility foes for eiuctric service, uemanU is allocated in several ways. Demand may be allocated eitner as charges per kiluwact as is dune for businesses, schools, cnurcnes and others. Another allocation method is to divide customer class demand Charges oy the anticipated kilowatt nour sales for the customer class, tnus making the demand a portion of th3 allergy charges. A further alternative, used by the City of Denton, combines ootn motoods providing a demand charge and a portion of demai)d in the energy charge, it is proposed to continue this metnod thereuy reflecting demand in twu 'ways for customers, This method reflects local and demand-related costs above anevgy for each customer class in addition to the energy charges related above. (:lee Nroposad Electric Hates, Exhibit 1), The uase demand rates fur commercial customers will rise by •Iuuut eight kd%) percent with an ad,justine tt co Lhe energy charge reflecting the additional revenue to ue gained from increasing the demand rate. the rates retain the R1 rate for residential cu$'tamira Who use small amounts of energy during the summer months as a quasi-lifeline rate, ThO$O CustomOrs will receive a facility charge of $5,50 'per montn, as they presently receive and an energy coatge of 4.4 cents per KWH, Tne R,~ rate for all otner residential users will retain the declining winter Ulock and the inverted summer block. The rate for R2 customers will be $6,50 facility cnarge, 4.9 cents per KWH in the winter muntns, declining to 4.4 cents per KWH for all energy usage over l,ODU KWH per month, Too base summer energy charge will be 5.3 cents per KWH, a decrease in the summer/winter differential of 0,1j per KWH, increasing to 5,60 per KWH for all usage over +,000 KWH per month, The Large Primary (LP) rate will retain the $49.50/month facility charge. Tne demdiid charge is proposed at $j.20 per KW witti an energy Qnarge of 3,5 cents per KWH. Qaneral ~ervlca Primary (GP) customers will retas,n the present $49,5U racility cilarge. The energy charge is proposed at 3.7 cents par KWH Mid uamanJ at $0,>3 per KW. Businesses in the ueneral Service (GS) rate olass will nave the same $lO,UU faoilityr cnarge for single phase and $13.00 for three pnase service. Tne demand rate will increase ay aDout eight (8%) percent to $5.~)O per KW and the unergy cnarge will oe set at 3.9 cents per KWH. Local governmental units will retain their present racility cnaryas, deceive a demand cnarge of $3.80 per KW and an energy rate of 3.9 cents per KWH, Cmurcnes'and otner centers of religious worsrhip rill nave tneir same facility rates of $10,OU for singio prise and $15.OU for three phase service. The demdnd.charge will stay at $3.40 and the e11drgy YSCe will gU tU 4.d Cents per Mi. ,j r: HATE DESIGN- WATER The proposed water ratas were generally established by adding $U.ly per 'thousand gallons of water used to existing rates, In additiun, the faoility charges were increased by a0out five (5%) percent. Tie rate structure retains the summer inverted i:jloek for residential users woo use more than 20,000 gallons per month, Additionally, the rates uase the monthly facility charge on the metar size. The uase residential (WI) facility chargo will increase by $U.2y per month to $4.:)U, Tile volume cliarge will increase to $1.45 per 1,UOU gallons except for summer usage in excess of 200000 gallons Wn1cn will 'ue aouut 25% more or $1.80 per 1,OOU gallons, The summer/winter time frames are maintained as May through October, summer, and Novemner tnrougn April, winter. The same rates and conditions are applied to cnurches under rate class W1R (Religious Wursoip), The commercial and industrial water rate increase (W'2) is proposed to change the base facility rate from $9,00 to $9.50 per montn. The 'volume rata will increase from $1,25 per 1,000 gallons to $1.40 for all usage. The rate charged to the City of Corinth is proposed to increase somewnat iris than other customers since tneir use is directly from the transmission system. Corinth will retain its $1!)U.UU per muntn facility charge, and the volume rate will increase to $1.35 per 1,000 gallons. During our designated summer months, tree uorinth rate will contlriue to nave an inverted olock fur all usage over S,UU0,0uu gallons per month of $1.65 per 1,000 gallons. NNTE CHANGES-WASTEWATER A few cnanges are prupused in tiie rate schedules for wastewater. Most are clerical in nature although they may have large impact if not made. The only rate cncinge p cpooed is for Industrial, Water (55). The current wastewater rates should rirovide sufficient revenue to cover service costs and within limits cost of service requirements. The rate schedule changes include reducing the Industrial Surcharge rate for users within the city limits due to an editing error In the previously adopted rates, Also -th6 Industrial $ur0narge wi'll'oe added to all rate classes availauie to ousiness aiid industrial customers, the rate for Industrial Water (55) will increase from the present facility charge of $91.00 per month to $9.00 and volume charges wii.l Lncrease from $ .60 per t, 000 gallons to $ 75 per 10000 Ualloi)s, N iXMt~tr t j CITY OF DENTON PROPOSED ELECTRIC RATES 14»86p-04 RATE CLASS FACILITY ENERGY DEMAND $/MONTH C/KWH $/KW/MO ~Y Yr RESIDENTIAL R1 $5.50 4,40 R2 1 PHASE $6,50 3 PHASE$11,00 HINTER. TO 1000 KWH 4,90 om 1000 4.40 SUMMER TO 3000 KWK 5030 OVER $000 5,00 COMMERCIAL GENERAL SERVICE SCAMWERCIAL? SS I PHASE $0,00 3,90 $5,30 3 PHASE 415.00 3190 $5,50 GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY 0P $49.50 3,70 $5.35 LARGE PRIMARY LP $49.90 3.50 $5.20 TEMPORARY POWER TEMP $10.00 6.10 GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT G1 1 PHASE $10.00 3190 $3.50 3 PHASE $15.00 3.90 $3.80 TRAFFIC LIGHTS 63 4.90 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING AF L PHASE $20.00 4,00 $1.00 3 PHASE $30.00 4.00 $1.00 amity it i CITY; OF DENTON 64OCTAIC RATES PROPOSED VS. 6I8TIN'.4 14-G4p-G4 PROPOSED EXISTING RATE CLASS FACILITY ENERGY DEMAND FACILITY ENERGY DEMAND $/MONTH C/KWH S/KN/MO $/MO NTH C/KWH $/KW/MO •1 r ..._._M..M_i ....44.....44. 10.M.Y..Y.ryr.Y.Y.V....Y.... RESIDENTIAL R1 $5450 4.40 $5450 5150 02 WINTER $6.50 $6.50 TO 1000 KWH 4;90 6600 AVER 1000 4.40 5.50 SUMMER $6.50 $6.50 TO 3000 KWH 5130 6050 OVER 3000 5.80 7,00 COMMERCIAL GENERAL SERVICE (COMMERCIAL) GS $10.00 3190 $5.50 $10.00 5110 $5.10 GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY 9P $49.40 3.70 $5.35 $49.50 4.90 $5.05 LARGE PRIMARY LP $49.50 3.50 $5.20 $49.50 4.80 $4.80 TEMPORARY POWER TEMP $10.00 6110 $10.00 7.20 GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT G1 $10000 3190 $3.80 $10.00 5.10 $3030 TRAFFIC LIGHTS 63 4.90 6400 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING AF $20.00 4.00 $1400 $20.00 5110 $1.00 RLECiRIC SERVICE PRO FORMA M 10001 i4-Sep-S4 Current Proposed Rates R+ktss PY '85 FY as NET MNH To SYSTEM 407,331 607,331 REV C/KWH So26 8.15 REVENUES RKWINTIAL 17,971 17,637 COMMERCIAL 289646 28,293 GOVERN" 21930 21897 OTHER EL BALES 647 641 TMPA COVERAGE NET 50534 51534 TMP'A SURPLUS 50000 59000 WEST TEX'UTIL CAP $30 330 OFF SYS SALES 4,337 41337 INTER (EARNED) 1°1142 11142 OTHER 323 325 TOTAL REVS 674062 66,336 PUP PON k FUEL ICENT.B/kMH 5.95 5193 EXPENDITURES PERSONAL SERVICES 31073 31073 SUPPLIES 269 269 PURC11AS9,,P0M ?)ND FUEL 51,015 51,015 MAINTENANCE 11201 19201 SERVICES 579 579 INS 6 SUNDRY 156 156 SALARY INCREASES 193 193 OTHER' 110 110 BAD DEBT 230 250 ADM TRANS 11268 11768 TOTAL EXPS 38,113 58,113 NET OPER REVS 81949 5,223 CAP` AND OTHER NON OPER EXP BUD CAPITAL 11083 1,083 DEBT SERVICE 30496 31496 ROT ON INV TRANS 10667 11667 TOT NON OPER EXP 6,246 6,246 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 64$59 649359 :rsrme ■t~ao■ NET `GAIN (LOSS) $2,703- $1,977 DEBT EERY COVER 2.56 2.35 w t><Nt1tT iV G1TY OF OENTON RATE CHANGE EFFECTS 8Y RATE CLASS t4-Sop-84 Rate FY 83-64 FY 04-65 Percent Class CENTS/kWH CENTS/kWN Ching* Residential R1 7,16 5,25 15.2% R2 7,26 9139 1516% Cos*sr c i s l LP 6423 7,24 1602% 6P 6444 746 17.4% 68 7,43 8659 1506% Tamp 9.31 10,40 11.7% Religious Worship AW 9.65 9.62 13,5% Local Government Gl 6.43 7,55 17,4%. Total 7,03 8,14 15.9% r city OF WON UMMIT v KKTAIC LKIL T AESMJ KI AT "Ml MTEI F IKAI VI AA 1144.15 H-1M-M DAY4112 Wil 1AIE1 MISS CWT c111 0 NATE EMEI! CIS I ENE1 CON 2 ECA IAIE AEYN NATE us 1ILL1 0 o l N1112 s IAN ll I pe Ki c m w c m to c m K" 0 II I* •~N..MN. M.. ...•,_,Y .Y_„r.. M_.NMM. w~.MM,.. .....r_M.Y rriw.. At 011111" 341244 0 14,433 0 3450 0400 00440 $0040 000M 11163 at 11NMM:A 32o"2 ' 0 1211" 0 Soso 0000 0, 601 4,0440 000275 1, o32 V HIM 661%0 0 101517 10,067 0630 Ooo 0044" 0,4440 040225 41102 ~ 02 MNNO 97,17s 0 110,101 12,544 6.50 0.00 o,om 0.0510 060275 1ot621 N"- Tit Ks 251,911 0 170,130 32,611 $17,637 U MOM 44 116 491154 0 49.30 5120 0, 0350 010350 0,6225 31472 ItMII A 47 145 631063 0 44050 5.20 0003% 010350 0,0213 416" M NIM* 17 54 22,332 0 49,50 5.40 04370 000M 0.0225 11647 lIIiNIE11 !s 64 22j0% 0 41.50 5140 010370 0.0310 0.0275 21157 0 NIII'm 15,013 $21 12j919 0 10.0 5150 0103" 0.03" 0.0125 7x049 !1555:" Isom 1131 1060621 0 10,00 7.50 4103" 0103" 0.0275 9, 220 YNN..Y _Y... TOT CON 30,534 1.071 3521102 0 021,250 BI NINTEN 730 43 44,503 0 10,00 3.10 0403" 0103" 0,6225 1,063 NM 151 48 170470 0 10,00 3.10 0163" 0103" 6.0275 1,352 12 NINTEA 6 0 2,033 0 4,00 0400 0.0000 00000 0.0225 201 PAD 6 0 29060 0 0.00 000 0.0000 40000 0,0275 212 13 NiNtEN 12 0 375 0 0.00 0600 0.04" 0.04" 040223 21 R M 12 0 406 0 0.00 0.0o 0.04" 0,04" 060275 31 IW4, Im IOV 1,517 9i 36,14b 0 02,192 a 111110 12 0 601 0 0.00 0.00 O.ow 0.0000 0,0225 40 km 12 0 606 0 0.00 0.00 O.o01o 0,0000 00175 45 TENT MIM71r1s 1,605 0 404 0 10.00 0.00 040610 0,0610 0.0226 92 lINNIEN 10570 0 152 0 10,00 0.00 0.0610 0.0010 0.022'3 91 NN MINER 563 13 1,310 0 10,00 3110 0.0400 0.0400 00225 131 573 ; 20 21413 0 1660 3110 0, 0110 061100 160275 237 TOt OTII 4,335 ..33 61773 0 1641 araaaaaa" a.aaaa aaaaaaaaaa as"" araaaaa TOTAL 2",377 11145 $74,551 329611 041,420 CITY OF OEN14N EXHIBIT VI ELECTRIC UTILITY. REVENUES AT CURRENT RATES 14-Sep-84 FISCAL YEAR, 1984-65 CUSTOMER BALES AALES SALES COST CHO OMG RATE EWER CHB i EWER CH 2 ECA BASE REVS AATE CLASS BILLS NM MWH 1 MMH 2 f PEA MO 1 PER 'KM C PER KMH C PER KWH C PER KMH f 1 1000 ....r ..r-r .r .ter.. r. . 04. .a...... At WINTER 34,214 0 14'1453 0 5150 0100 0 0650 0, Oise 0.0125 1,1 1 R1 SUMNER 32,772 0 12,189 6 5150 0.00 040550 060550 0 0115 11044 R2 WINTER 96,960 0 40,387 20,067 6.50 0100 040600 040350 0.0125 4 662 R2 SUMMER 97t,975 0 1101701 12,644 6150 0100 0.0650 0.0700 0.0175 104167 -.rr.. . . TOT REB 251,991 0 178,130 32,611 f17~ti,1 LP MINTER 44 116 49}854 0 49.50 440 060480 0.0480 0.0125 31875 BUMMER 47 145 63,0.63 0 49.50 4.50 0.0480 0.0480 040175 41829 BP MINTER 97 31 220332 0 49.50 5.05 040490 0.0490 0.01%5 11671 SUMMER 95 64 28,006 0 49.50 3005 0.0490 0.0490 01,0175 21190 BS MINTER 151013 327 820919 0 10.00 site 010510 0.0510 0,0125 71084 SUMMER 15,168 361 106,621 0 10.00 5.10 040310 0.0510 0.0175 9.297 --...r ....r _ TOT COM 30,534 1,071 352,802 0 1210646 81 MINTER 730 43 14,502 0 10.00 3.50 010510 010510 0,0125 19019 BUMMER 751 40 171410 0 10100 3.50 O.Od10 0.0510 000175 11372 B2 MINTER 6 0 2,033 0 0100 0.00 0.0000 0,0000 0,0125 201 BUMMER 6 0 21060 0 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0175 212 83 MINTER 12 0 375 0 0100 0.00 010600 0.0600 0.0125 27 SUMMER 12 0 406 0 0100 0100 010600 010600 010175 31 . TOT BOV 11517 91 36;846 0 $2,930 DD MINTER 12 0 609 0 0.00 0100 010000 010000 040125 40 SUMNER 12 0 606 0 0.00 0,00 010000 000000 010115 45 TEMP WINTER 11605 0 904 0 10100 0100 010120 0.0120 0.0125 92 BUMMER 1,570 0 952 0 10.00 0.00 0.0720 0.0720 0.0175 -92 RN MINTER 563 13 19390 0 10.00 3.40 010310 010610 0.0125 138 SUMNER 573 20 2,413 0 10,00 3.40 0 0510 0.0510 0.0175 2~9 --,..,..r Toy 0TH 4 335 33 6s773 0 1641 rrersaryr■_ rfrr,~r.' .trurr~rra ■r~irr ' aaaaisa TOTAL 281,377 11195 574t5sl 32,611 8501193 fB C I TT OF 1010 EINI~rT VI1 IUCTAIC 411LITY AEVENNES AT dMAEIIT MIS FIICAI MEAA 1913-11 14-5M-64 CI ITOW IAIEI IAIEii iAl1EN CHIT CMI w MR w CHI I an 0114 2 to I* AEw MR MASS, OILLI 0 "1 02 t PEA M $ W KN' C FEN MII C IEN KIN C PEN 0 t 1100 N..- NY. W. .N. Y....... N' N.«.. ....N_.~Y .N.. k1 VIM 321221 0 13$910 0 5450 0900 000304 00x10 0;0130 m 11 ` PAD 301106 0 119310 0 $400 0,00 010!30 0No 00010 NI A2 NINTU 11,142 0 319551 191064 6050 0000 0/0 00 0;0330 000030 40066 12 IM 121091 0 1441039 11,"1 14."0 o1v 010630 010700 010030 19333 TOT AES 236,072 0 INt116 309153 MOP LP NINTEA 44 114 "9331 0 49,50 4410 0,0410 0,0410 0,0030 31014 SIM 47 142 61 l 11l 0 4440 4400 00 0 0 0,0400 0l 0430 39104 IF NINTEA 97 37 21 662 0 4940 3105 0,0490 0;0410 MOO 10411 SIMMI 93 63 211166 0 0 50 5105 010490 0, 0490 040030 11734 /S NINXI 141711 320 10,431 0 10.00 5,10 0.0310 01610 0,0030 61125 IINNMA 141163 M 1039962 0 10,00 5110 010510 0,0310 010030 1t567 . TOt CON ~9j929 19030 342,751 0 123'1613 at VI NT" l01 41 14,212 0 10100 3650 010510 O, o510 010030 919 son 121 46 16, 771 0 1040 3.50 0.0510 010510 0, 0030 1$014 62 N1Nt" 6 0 21033 0 0400 0100 0,0000 010000 010030 201 son 6 0 29060 0 0600 0100 0,0000 010000 0,030 212 63 MINTER 12 0 373 0 0100 0400 0,4100 000 00 0,1030 24 SIMIMIi 12 0 406 0 0100 0100 010100 0.0600 olo03/ 26 .i...ii. N. 'tdT aw 11431 17 359A57 0 #29462 IS NINTBN 12 0 601 0 0400 0100 010000 00010 040130 40 INI MA 12 0 606 0 4600 0100 01olo0 060000 011030 '45 MIP NINTEA 19541 0 IN 0 10,00 0,00 010720 0,0'!20 O o030 10 HANNA I9501 0 1111 0 10100 0,00 0.0720 0,0720 010010 76 AN MRS, 510 12 19334 0 10140 3410 00310 mall 0,1030 121 IIMN N sm It 2,31f 11.01 3140 0/0330 1443U 6, on ' 116 YMN... •..N M...M.. Y..M. .Y~YM to? on 49163 32 69531 0 #351 T07A1 2720121 11169 333,270 3010 $410110' n 11HIN T Vil THPA FIXED COSTS Assl4ned as Energy Costs X 1000) 14-Sop-04 COMPUTATION OF BASE TMPA FIXED ENERGY COST Rate per Kilowatt-hour THPA FIXED 'COSTS. $30,337 LE!$ COVERAGE RITURN (StO 1 LESS 1403-04 OV RPAY (51000) Mwr..rr• TOTAL RECOVERABLE $21,272 DIVIDED by NET TO lYSTEM (MW 6070531 j CENTS PER KWH 3.50 i I ~KNIrfIT 1M COMPUTATION JR ENINSY COST ADJUSTMENT Six Month Averaging 14-Sep-04 t/ N 1000) HUNTER SUMMER TOTAL DENTON SENERATION f1i0S1 $2,575 $30627 GAS 444 2,571 31020 OIL 607 0 607 COMMANCHE PEAK 34 09 142 Gll1SON8 CREEK 31196 3,359 7,155 SIP LISNtTE 432 340 792 ECONOMIC DISPATCH 21952 41934 71916 rrrrrrr+ rrrrrrrr r+wwrwrr GUITCTAL 51133 I1,S2S 19,642 LESS OFF SYS SALES 2,906 1,431 41337 rrrwrwwr rrrrwwrr Nil FUEL k PUR POW 33,220 $10,097 !11,323 NET SALE6 (W) 246,001 361,250 607,331 MET CE''"G/KWH 2,125 2.795 2,123 PROPOSED ECA CENTS/kWH 2,230 2.710 2,347 REVENUES DEVELOPED 45,337 $9,934 415,471 M Y tMM1a1T )s RLICTRIC C08T COMPARIOCNM 1'4-lop-81 Typical fills 0111DtNTIAL 1021 1000 kWH per month Present Proposed Rats Rats Increase 1984 190M Minter Facility $6.50 $6450 Energy 040;00 000490 ECA 010050 0,0225 Monthly bill $71,50 $78400 $6450 Cents/kwh 7,15 7,80 9,09% Summer Facility $44SO $6050 Energy 010650 0401130 ICA 040050 0,0275 Monthly bill $76.50 $87,00 $10.30 Cents/kwh 7465 8170 13,73% .....r....rr .r ...................►„►..►►.►.►.r►►...►.r►. RESIDENTIAL (RI) 300 kMH per month Present Proposed Rate Rate increase 1984 1985 Minter Facility $5,50 $5650 Energy 0,0550 0,0440 ECA 0.0050 0.0225 Monthly bill $23,50 $23.45 $1.93 Cents/kwh 7.83 8.48 8.30% Summer Facility $5,30 $5430 Energy 010550 0.0440 ECA 010050 0.0275 Mehthly bill $23,50 $26,93 $3.45 Cents/kwh 7183 8,98 14,68% 77 iliRtr+te testt eeM~rian#~ '+1• R CAMMtRC1A1, 1081 1000 kWM per month 6 ko demand Present Proposed Percent Rate Rate Increase 1944 1985 Minter Facility $10000 $10,00 En*r4y 040010 0,0390 Demand $5,10 $5050 [CA 060050 0,0725 Monthly 8111 $96,60 $104400 $7490 Cents/kwh 9,66 10,45 4.18% 4uMmer Facility $10,00 110400 Energy 000510 0.0390 Demand 05,10 $5650 [CA 000050 0,0275 Monthly 4111 $96460 $109050 $12490 Cents/kNh 9466 10.95 13,35% rrr..rrrrrr..,rrr...r..r..r.rr.rr.rrrrrw rrr.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr COMMERCIAL 1061 75% Load Factor Customer 2959650 kWH per month 340 kW demand Present Proposed Percent Rate Rate Increase 1994 1985 . Winter Facility 010,00 $10.00 Energy 010610 0.0390 Demand $5,10 $5,50 ECA 0.0050 0.0225 Monthly Dill $19,320 $21,162 $10842 Cents/kwh 6.53 7.16 9.53% Summer Facility $10,00 $10,00 Energy 0.0510 0,0290 Demand $51i0 $3,50 ECA 010050 00275 Monthly 8111 $19,320 $22,641 $30320 Cents/kwh 6.53 7166 17,19% A~Nt~i1 p ~ R1ilttric test comparison$$ pal. 3 COMMERCIAL Ills 201 Load factor Costoser 14,400 kWh par sonth 100 «w demand Present Proposed Rite Rate Increase 19#4 1905 Minter facility 410400 110000 Energy 000510 000590 Oiaand 45.10 45.50 ECA 010050 0.0225 Monthly pill 11,310 111450 4120 Conte/kwh 9014 9499 9199% Summer facility #10000 410000 Energy 010510 0.0390 Dowd $1,10 #5050 ECA 010050 0,0275 Monthly Sill 411330 !1,531 4193 Cents/kwh 9.16 l0,49 14,41% COMMERCIAL (OV 30% Load Factor Lustomer 21,900 kWH per month 100 kW demand Present Proposed Rate Rate Increase 1904 1995 Winter facility 410,,00 410,00 Enargy 010sio 0`,0390 Demand 156`10 45,50 ECA 0.0050 0,0225 Monthly bill si,746 410907 0160 Cants/kMh 7,97 9.71 9119% Summer facility 110,00 410,00 Energy 0.0510 010390 Demand 45,10 15,50 ECA 010050 060275 Monthly Bill (19746 12,016 4270 Cents/kwh 7.97 9,21 15.46% llxl~r tt x, r - tloctrie cost C"04? eeae, poke 4 CONNINCIAL 1111 $0% Loos 'hitter Cueteeer 361500 kMli per tenth too MM 404404 Present Proposed Rate Aot$ Increase 1914 1915 Minter Facility 010,00 $t0,00 Energy 010010 010390 Desand $5110 $5150 ECA 010050 0102425 monthly Sill $2,064 $29105 $241 Cants/kwh 7102 7161 9.39% Suesor Facility $10400 $tO400 Enor/y 010010 040390 00mand ;5.10 !0100 K~A 010000 010270 monthly sill $21564 $2,917 $423 Cento/kwh 7,02 1.11 16.51% ..!,r...................................... PAlMAAY ILPI 50% Load Factor Custossr 365,000 kMH per sonth 1000 kW dowd Present Proposed Rate Rate increase 1904 1985 Minter Facility $10100 110100 Energy 010480 0.0350 Demand $4.80 $5.20 ECA 010050 0.0725 monthly sill $24,155 $269196 $2,043 Cents/kwh 6462 7.16 8446% Sussex Facility $10.00 $10100 Energy 0.0460 0.0350 Desand $4180 $5.20 ECA 0.0050 0.0275 monthly 8111 $24,155 $28,023 $3,868 Cents/kwh 6.62 7.68 16.01% .~~--~..--n...,.-?:--•4-r end-.",^--';--':?s-~. ••---7;--- - ----~--~--o.c.-~---^---- ~ENIIIT MI ^ CITY OF DUTON PROPOSED MATER RATES 20.1*#-S4 RESIDENTIAL (M11 Customer Charge (monthly) Volume Charge $1,411 per 1000 gallons 3/4" Motor $4,30 Over 70,000 gal $1450 per 1000 gallons + 1" 1,21 $523 2" $9,00 CONNERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL (M21 Custsoor-Charge (monthly) Volume Charge 11,40 per 1000 gallons 3/4" 'Motor $9030 IN $10460 1-112" $13426 2" $10,00 S $45400 4" $74-00 6" $97,00 IN $110,00 SALES FOR RESALE (W31 Customer Charge (monthly) Volume Charge $1,35 per 1000 gallons $130,00 Over 31000,000 gal 1,63 per 1000 gallons + WRASOVERNMENTAI SALES OF RAM LAKE MATER (W6l Customer Charge (monthly) Volume Charge $0.90 per 1000 gallons $97,00 RELISIOUS WORSHIP MR) All charges as residential (Ml) above. + Applies to the months of May through September only ALL OUTSIDE OF CITY SALES AND SERVICES WILL BE AT 100% OF THE APPLICAILE RATE i to I its 07-1M-84 RIFOr0u0 V1 113TINw RATIO 1ROPO♦10, E%t1CINS RESIDENTIAL (00 RATES RATES Customer Charm 3/4" Meter $4450 04,25 to $0050 $5,25 1-112" 00425 07,75 2" $9,00 $5450 Volume Charge 11445 per 1000 9411004 $1030 Over 20000 gal $1,10 per 1000 gallons + $1.60 COMMERCYAL AND INDUSTRIAL (N2) Customer charge 3/4" Meter $9480 $9,00 to $10950 $10400 1.1/20 911.25 $1r00 2" $15,00; 014,75 3 14p,00 14040 4" 176400 $7240 6" 099000 $92,00 A" .$110400 $105.00 Volume Charge $1440 per 1000 gallons $1.23 SALES FOR RESALE W) Customer Charge $150.00 per month W0400 Volume Charge $1,35 per 1000 gallons $1.25 Over 3,000,000 gal 1.64 per 1000 gallons s 1153 IkTRASOVERNMENTAL SALES OF RAN LAKE HATER (N6) Customer Charge $97.00 per month 192.00 Volume Charge 00,90 per 1000 gallons $0.50 RELIGIOUS NOASHIP MR) All charges as residential above lNll • Applies to the months 04 May through September only 77 tiXNylt1" f1tI1 WATER SERVICE PROFORNA It x 1000? Current Pruposed 14-Sep-84 Rate$ Rkttvf FY 'I5 FV '15 Percent "ft HILL DAL SALES 39190 3,190 Increast COST /1000 SALE $1063 .$1610 10,77% ...."p........... REVENUII RESIDENTIAL 20818 3,117 COMNIRCIAL 2j109 21436 AI$ALI 107 113 OTHER SALES 14 94 NON OP#RATINS 224 226 BOND INT INC 623 623 TOTAL' REVS 6,046 60606 EXPENPITURIS PE!lA,QNNAL SERVICES 1,109 11109 SUPeLIES 165 165 PR6UC1`LON POWER 613 613 MAINTINAMCE 469 469 PURCHASED WATER 703 783 SERVICE, 298 221 INSURANCE AND SUNDAY 28 28 SALARY INCREASES 73 73 ADMIN TRANSFERS 602 602 TOTAL E%PS 49069 41069 NET OPER REVS 10477 20536 CAPIT AND O1NER NON OP IUD CAPITAL 623 623 DEBT SERVICE 10454 11434 RET ON INV TRANS 395 395 TOT NONOPER 20472 x0472 TOT OPER i NON OPER E%P 60341 61341 ■ouse* !rums NET GAIN 1L0881 1$4951 $65 DEPRECIATION 247 247 DEBT SERVICE COY 1.36 1.74 ErMlrtT tiv CIO orKI M Ow Yilllty 14•IM~14 RKMiE1 AT FMMOIU MR1 MAI 0E111EIITIAI RE111E IAl aMIMIAI 08 FM WAS FOR loft WOMAL Into /Clow /Cmms IMNAITAIAI MEW KIAU Mt FINIOU AVER 11,000 IAl OTEII mm IIU IN r RIMIMANTII AINNMI; Mill/ 114,M1 1571012 16,317 12 12 321 MTEM DIES 311",1/1 1,OW1416 473,4K 11161,063 501311 21,117 p,Sll 11031 GIAAEII' MTEM mom K25 0100 $1501 0 MIN N, 00 "M 1130 f1.60 $1025 $1.25 $1.33 010 11.25 CIMAENi K" $3,117, 311 $2, 010,111 $1511571 $2,1"9112 $14111! $420144 $61,151 $16, OS1 PRrIIEI MR$ mom $4.30 $1150 $151100 "710 "'So VMIYM: $145 f1,10 $1141 11.35 $1.4 01" $1140 0004 SEW $3,7511113 $2,254,141 052,175 $1,1369113 K4,f21 "410" $71,376 $17,661 IMI AEVS 059 M2 f1'~b770t "6.602 12411. 301 p3I 711 ;21.4 31< 11,3ft $101M liIw we fans I ION IM "Tag RATR CqM too*O TyOiedl Ilillt 01810INTIAL NO 51000 Gallons per month Present Proposed Rate Rate Increase 1904 1905 Facility N,25 $4450 Volume 1030 1045 Monthly bill $10,75 $11,75 $1,00 9,30% rrrrrrrrwrrrr.rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 20,000 gallons per month Present Proposed Rate Aato Increase 1014 1985 Facility $4,20 $4450 Yalu** 1130 1145 Monthly bill $30,25 $33,50 $345 10.74% rr►rrrrrrwrr,rrrrr.wrwrrr...rrr r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 50,000 Gallons per month-Winter Present Prop4ied Increase Rite Rate 1904 1985 Facility $4,25 $4,50 Volume 1630 1.45 Monthly bill $69,25 $77,00 $7,75 11,19% rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.rrrrrrrrrrr 30,000 Gallons per month-$ummort Present Proposed Rite Rate increase 1984 1985 Facility $4,25 $4,50 Volume 1430 1,45 over 20,000 1,60 1.10 Monthly bill $1.30 $1,45 lO.tS 11.54% 1XHIB1t Xy 1 Motor coot eoi"esiooso pose 2 GOMMtIlC>IAi. tM~1 21000 Gallons per month Present Proposed Increase Rate Rate 1984 li05 Facility $94Uu $9400 Volume 1425 1./0 Monthly bill $11.50 $12,30 $0490 6~ 46>< ....................w. ..........o...- 5,000 Ballo6s per month Prodpnt Proposed Increase Rate Rate 1114 1905 Facility $9000 $1,50 Volume 1125 1,40 Monthly bill $1545 $16450 $145 8,20% . 50,000 Gallons per month Present Proposed Increase Kato Rate 1944 1905 Facility $9,00 $9,50 Volume 1,25 1,40 Monthly bill $71,50 $79,50 $0,00 11.19% - 2009000 Bs1100 per month Present Proposed Increase Rate Rate 1904 1905 Facility $9,00 $9.50 Volume 1.25 1,40 Monthly bill $254.00 $209,50 $30,50 11,y0X rt~~ a: 1984 ACTUAL AND PROPOSED Q/KWH R-2 1000 KWH 10 9 8.7 8 7.'7 8.1 7.8 t 7.2 7.58 7 ' PER 6 KWH 4 3 2 JULY AUG SEPT OCT Nov MAY E 1 \1 I. Q PER KWH SERVICE RATE 9-2 WINTER - 1000 KWH I0 J 9 8.80 8,50 8 8.08 7.80 7,82 f 7 6.32 t 6 PER 5 KWH 4 3 2 Z 0 DTN CRNT DENTON GARLAND DTN COOP TEXAS NM TEXASP&L ELECTRIC PATE C1MMIW eats per KM cltylutility KW Kim KMM KwN KIN KM 500 700 1000 Is" 2000 3000 --1-iN-- ----.----N------ -------4--.--.------..--.--1------..--N--..r.-.-.. 1Mtat,cwrnt 1,73 IOU 1,01 7.36 7,26 7113 Iettbn 1.211 too 1,01 7.0 7.42 7023 7103 owlw 1122 1000 1,12 7,61 1.62 ?.U orat+n;'Coer.w 9145 9,01 1,10 1.3e x147 a.31 tol11kM Mar, 9.05 - ION Lso 9.32 1123 0.14 TaYts' I+l 11es 1164 6132 1.16 6106 5." I 11 1~. 5 ~1k i T d PER KWH SERVICE RATE R•2 SUMMER 1000 KWH PER MONTH 10 9 8.70 193 8.58 8.22 8156 8 7.64 7 s d PER 5 KWH 4 3- 2 0 DTH CRNT DENTON GARLAND DTN COOP TEXAS NM TEXASPSL ELECTRIC Ott t"IW coats W 0 clty~u~illty Kw KMN Ko to KON KIN 100 100 1000 ISO 2000 3000 ~.....Y........... Y M N.. N... M Y....... MY ..NM.Y...Y..Y.....M.Y.._.....M .......................~M.Y..MY.~Y...~.. wetwoewrint 9,23 IA I,SI 1.36 1.21 I,ls kotoo 1.211 9035 109I 1,70 1,40 1,31 1121 I4r1bw SOO 1.40 1,22 1.09 -1,02 1 K swoo ca", 11,01 9,01 I.11 ills 7,9s 717s Ttx,K+oM lMx. 9.46 9.13 1,93 1,7s 1466 I137 Tnu 1+L 11,12 7.14 1.64 7,47 7139 7131 -^,rT 7r7-, - ^°ar1 GT 1984 ACTUAL AND PROPOSED 4/KWH GS 1000 KWH 4 KW 10 9,7 9.2 9 8.7 9 8.2 8,6 8 7 4/KWH 5 4 J 2 I JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV MAY " 1l . is PER KWH COWERCIAL GS L.f. 20% - 1000 KWH PER MONTH 7 KW 16 14 12.98 12 11.02 11.21 10.71 10.60 10.19 lb 9.22 ¢ 8 RER KWH 6 4 2- 0 OTN CRNT OTH SUNR DTN WM GARLAND DTH COOP TEXAS NM TEXASP&L ELECTRIC RATE CONIMII* coots W KW kM 2 kv 3 kv 1 kr 14 kr 34 kv is Citylutility KW ON KW KIN KIN Km 250 so 1000 2000 5000 10000 .wrNNYwwwww.rww..rr..r~N.. N.. N w.... w w w w w...................................................... w w..N w. DN►ton,r 13.71 11.11 10.72 10.21 ?191 9111 1Mth's 14,21 12,21 U,21 10471 10441 10631 iM 11M 11.11 l17 942 1,17 1,3s 1199 Notes C". 13.94 11414 10410 10.09 4.11 0113 this Mw N". 11.14 10.40 12.91 14.07 15.04 13141 toots K 11192 9.4 10,19 11.11 13,47 11." DMitM,urrMt 14.02 12.02 11.02 10.12 10.22 10.12 o CCC d PER KUH COMMERCIAL GS L.F, SOS 100,000 KWH 274 KW 10 s, l6 6 7,66 7.94 7180 7 7,03 t 6.50 6.62 6 PER 5 KWK 4 3 2 1 0 ON WNTR ON SUMR ON CRNT GARLAND ON COOP TXAS NM T P 6 L ELECTRIC RATE CWA016* toots per KW kM W kr 137 ko 105 kw 274 kw 610 cityNtiiity KM KMM KITH KWH KMR 25000 500oo 75000 100000 250000 w... ..r.b............w...................................... Naton,cvr#►t 7.97 7.95 7.94 7.94 1,93 OiMta,M<Atn 71N 7.67 7166 7,66 7,65 swims 7IR 2.13 7,12 7.10; 1,79 kotoo Coo0, 6057 6653 6051 6130 6,41 tn6► be ym, 1,18 7,16 1.07 7168 6196 Tht~~ NL 7,23 7.11 6111 6.62 5140 , n m ~.,9 ,7-7 t t PER KWH LARGE PRIMARY L,F, 50% 500x000 KWH PER MONTH 1370 KW 10 9 8 7,68 7.55 y; 19 t 7 6.78 6.93 PER 6 6.48 KWH 5 5,39 4 3 2 1 0 DTN CRNT OTN SIMR DTN WNTR GARLAND DTN COOP TEXAS NM TEXASP&L EL 111C MR COIMMim clots W 0 kw 61 kv 137 kM 214 kr 613 kM 1370 W 270 City/Utility KMM KNN Km KIM KIM a 21000 10000 101000 250000 500000 1000110 ~ ~~~~~NMY~wwYwNw~~YNYb\Y,NNN wwN W wyNYwYwYNMNNNMNN~bYMMyy~~NY Yrwwy YwYNY~wwyyNY 1~tM Lm u 7,31 7.27 7,17 7.1'1 7,11 1,11 1Mtim U5/ts 7,17 7'71 1,21 7,N 7.N 1.w owl awl 1,24 7,24 1010 6111 0,71 6.74 IMtM Cw, 6037 02 1,11 6441 6641 1N Tau No NN, 1,11 7.16 703 6691 6113 6192 Time K 1,17 1.04 6.47 6650 3131 3,34 I~ta,c~rrMt 7,74 7,63 7.50 7156 1.56 U, BREAK EVEN POINT; 404 KWD • .14 KWH $ PER MONTH AT 10,000 KWH 55 50 45 40 i 35 S 30 26 20 16 $10 5 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 55% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 27.40 13.70 10.00 7.84 6.08 64,79 18.26 10.96 9.12 6.84 5.48 ~ i t, E PER THOUSAND RESIDENTIAL WATER W1-W - 5,000 GALLONS PER MONTH CO 3.5 3.0 2.79 2.5 2.35 2,08 $ 2.0 1.93 PER 1.76 1.61 THOUSAND 1.S 1.32 GALLONS 1.0 0,5 0.0 DENtON LWSYILL DALLAS GgLANO BRYAN CRRLTN FRS BRN wtor Rate Cogwiw Cost 4r* ThomaaW Cltylutility OALLON "LLINS BALLow mum 6KLONS 6A11o1s 2300 5000 too 13000 20000 54000 Dottie $3,00 $2,13 01.71 $L31 $1.51 11.34 Iat"of 11,23 $2.33 $I 40 $1.73 41.68 $1.71 LMRrville $4,04 $2,79 $2,17 41196 $1683 $1173 kilo $2.04 $1.61 $1.,34 AM $1,29 $L 22 bled $1,11 $1,32 ti, 14 $1,04 $1,03 10.92 kyam $2.41 $1.76 $1,40 0121 $1.12 $0,44 C+rroltoN 12.36 $2.01 $j1.94 $1,M $1.17 11013 From back $2.36 $1.93 $1,72 $1.61 $1.36 $1.37 _ PER THOUSAND COMMERCIAL WATER w2--5,000 GALLONS PER MONTH 4,0 3.5 3.30 3.0 r. 2.79 S 2.5 PER 2.13 2.08 THOUSAND 2.0 1.93 GALLONS 1.5 1.32 1.19 1.0 0.5 0.0 DEN1'ON LwMLL DALLAS GARLAND BRYAN CAALTN FRS SRN wtor late Cogeriw- Coen Fer TAweee/ citywcility U111111 vum man ULLOM! 111L0a MUCK 1000 soon IS000 23000 soooo moo iiaiaiaa NaaNal aaaaNiaaY aaNNaiiaaaaaaiN NN~YaaNNaiNNNNN-aNaa laa-NaaN iaaauaaiiuaaNaVi-NaaaaNNN~aNNNNN 0eeton 11023 ~43$ 31,13 01.1 11,43 6437 1Mt~,r $10,0 $}t3o ir.o~ $1.71 f,s+ $1,32 L iivi111 n;33 "all 04% 11 n If~17 1'l,►2 bales t2 N $I It $0,90 f0 a 10,11 lO.a IVIVA $4,10 k:32 11401 11419 OO.n 101114 Irv" $1413 $2413 11,33 $1,29 $1,11 $1,05 Cwrelta $3.00 $2.01 II M $1111 $1,37 $1,33 Fereere Meech 13.15 $1,93 $1411 $1,30 $1.37 $02 ~ s,aa , 1 1 s PER THOUSAND COMMERCIAL WATER W2 - 769000 GALLONS PER MONTH 4,0 3.5 3.0. PER 2.6 . THOUSAND 2.0 GALLONS 1.62 1.55 1.5 1.52 1.05 1.0 ' 1.00 .85 .84 0.5 0.0 DENTON LWSVtLL DALLAS GARLAND BRYAN CRRLTN FRS BRN #AtW Rite c.Mrim- 49 W ThamW c tv~vtility SALLOW GALLO 1ALLO won SALLOW sAuoN 1000 5000 13000 23000 50004 15000 -~HN W MNMN1-MNN---~NNNN.I-Y-NNNNN~-Y NNIN-N W MNM-N-N--.M--W r.--.~---K-. V--Y M~Y~ W~ W N~-W Mf 1MtOR $10,23 $7430 .$1413 11,61 $1,43 11.37 l tal,' f10." $3.30 1233 $1.71 $1,34 11,52 lwiwill• N033 $4,11 11,11 $i.74 f1447 $132 kiln $ +4 $1011 $O f4' f04 M $0011 10,13 1r11M N.10 $1.32 11.01 IO,f1 $0,12 0,64 kyM K413 $2.13 $1433 $i.21 $1611 11,05 Gtr6itoo $5.00 12.41 $1.N 116111 11,37 $1433 haw Irmh $5.13 $1113 $1.61 $1.50 $1,37 $1,32 N IIIM~~~ ~ ~E~g CNf~,ft' A A~ CITY alp .~+Q ~ PROAM 4M A i0iW im-CL1LX% AM F4N%►'YDIN<i KR AN E"WI'L LATE TM , L or TW CITY or D4 =40 '1'l wA MW 00AMI . 14 That pAvLwit to Article 11 of Chapter 25 of the Code of UcdinOM", the rates, chards, fees, deposits and procedures for prcwiding electrical service by the City to its cust4amra are hereby estiblishad as follows ELMTRICAL SxRVM TASia Or CMIUMS PAGE ARTWA 1. GBWAL SaVt= CK 4= AM PpQMWWS A. Account Connaction Fee 3 8. Account Reconnection Fee 3 C, Howe Moving Chases 3 i D, Insufficient Fund Check Handling Charge it E. Maintenance Work 4 Casmrcial/It-AAtrial Custr Wrs F, Customer Requested Meter Readings 5 G, Meter Test Fee 5 H. Miscellanimm Services 6 1. Sale for Resale 7 J. Service Deposits 7 K, Special Facilities Rider 8 ARTICLE 11, SCHED ES of RATS A. Schedule Rl- Residential Service Rate 9 PAGE 1- EL CHIC BATE ORDINANCE t1. Schedula IL2- 116408 ttial SOMOO tote 11 C, Schedule LP- Lar" 'AKO%ly 14 Cawtieircial 4 Indastr al- L* tixg red Pover Service Rat" D. Schedule GP- General Service Primary 16 E. Schedule GS- General Service (Com■.rCd.l) 18 F, Schedule Gl- Local Gpwrnwat Lightitg & Power 20 Sam" Pate (City County, kOqmvkft School District) G, Schedule G2- Street iIV 22 H, Schedule G3- Street W* tic* ra Traffic Signals 23 I, Schedule DD- WW to Datan Lighting 24 (Security L,tg) J. Schedule Tl- Tamporary Service Schedule 26 K. Schedule Tro- Time of Use Rates-General Service 28 L, Schedule TP- Time of Use hates-Primary Service 30 M, Schedule P1- interruptible Service Elate 32 14. Schedule RW- Religious Worship 35 0. Schedule AF- Athletic Field 37 P. Schedule FICA- Energy Cost Adjustment 39 i PALE 2- F.LEiCMC RAZE ORD:UW CE "I -.-r 7177 r mrv m ~h a s ~grpgig. ~ r c ~ n r ;ate A. ~ ~1lAable ubm a euMfa=W xMgiwta eleatrla servl~os an a first tis» 4~i~s rRMIs +no pO!Csi'liaridMrvi pxrviously existed sad wltare a nsw acc~au+t " txwat 9 is es RATZ Resnslar time $20.00 `QwW ou~rt $30.00 Q=V 0 . A,g t ttaoo ygetta n Fee AR'i~IG1TI,,,,,~ Applicable when a austWog reewsts •orvice Ot an a6hus which he* rodatiet or previous service, Ath an existing account m her avi history. Aggular tier $10.00 Wartime $15.00 DEFINrM)N OF TIMM QWUM mg l r Time Rate will be ehaxged when customer completes application for connection or reconnection by 3;00 PM of the business day connection or reconnection is to take place or next business day service comecti.on or reconnection is allowed. Overtime Efate will be charged for all instances %~,here customer requests soma ay ~r weekend service connection or recomtk:tion and does not meet Regular Tine guidelines. C. House Moving Charges APPLICATIM Applicable whenever a house or other unusual snd oversized y structure is mnved within the electric service area of the City, The Cit will review the proposed route for safe transportAtion regarding glectric service. PAGE 3- ELEt7IttIC RATE ORDUAMCE Fier ftVUW $45,00 Damp Deposit ►.~VII~yV for ~ MW rsp~ utility sue.. for the PA"' alit n~ O"roisied struc~tras X11 be in aocoti+d~cwr with appiicable sohsdule relatiq to fork, Carrcial and Indostifil Gi taares: PlA7daxhTT Pa merit will be in advor" and will be in addition to applicable dwoop deposit which is also to be collected tin advarc of satually moving the structures. Doos p deposit is refundable after structwo is mom, Daowees, if am, will be subtracted from dm woe deposit before D. IIns ici" Fund Check HaIdIkS Charge ARK.IG*TI~1 Applicable wha a custowr check has been dishonored by the smiatpis bank and returned to the City of Mon. RATE Per Q-ack $10,00 charge E, Ms~iatt nwMte_ _Work Com erciai tr l Customers APPLICATIM Applicable to maintenance work for commercial and industrial customers involving technicians, supervisors, department heads, and special equipment needed to perform the work. SILi.IM Labor (Regular Time) Actual time worked measured to the nearest one-carter hour and billed at the rate payroi~l:itivetof 35X. oe salary `plus Labor (Overtime) Actual time worked measured to the nearest one-t?jmrter hour and billed at one and one-half timss the Regular Time 'rate applicable to the em loyee's salary plus payroll additive of 35%. PAGE 4- ELWMEC RAZE QIDIlQANCE 7 ;T!'^C' '""e.; •r'Rr^"°' g"'af^'ta;i .*T,1TT'A+++~^c •*aT • r'4:T 'a :;I,-*ne+r 777 R^~R`~"+.rrr--'YM •rvrmM1'..m ,q 3 i~ all vok&lM to~MM►~ WWI +~~•`Ml haws ft * PLUM as +~pplia~bla 41, thl dietributiq► rgbe (cost toapIgo s0a) amicable to the vehicle sed e*dp w t Material Stoorw cost plus 25% and applicable sales tax* other 'Its ' acwal cost for meals and other misce a licabl wou tto abf. -pocket expenditures DEarn=m or T= ommiom a% ..Tics will covens all notial business hours up to an eight (8) hour (7 M CO 4 PM) daay during the worts week (Monday through Friday soooludin City holidays O Owrtim will be all hour otter than regular tim including Citv holidsys~ ,-txls and between the hours of 4:00 PM and 7:00 M, F, Customer !"Mted Meter Reeadims AFMICA17Cf1 When o 'customer r**mts a r*WUV of City meter due to a contested billing more than twice in the previous eleven (11) months and no error is found RME Per Additional Reading $20.00 BILLING charges will be added to the customer's next regular bill and will be due upon customer's receipt of bill and will he delinquent 15 days after billing date. 0. Pieter Test Fee APPLICATEN Applicable when a customer requests the testing of a City meter previously tested within the past four years and the meter is found to be within the accuracy standards. PAGE 5- ELECTRIC BATE atDYNANCE R"+AiTFP4',~"e' v!.hh°xR''}~. '~i591 M' ,r'15 gq 77 I '77 rw Tut no Newt. am 6, W MMw in the ow* a motor is fa AW to be in error by eorr then plus or adrKas M (2x) peroa~t. no dump will be 0640 for aster test and the custowar sill be credited or billed up to 24 months of past history in accordance with error found * H. Miscellaneous Services APKJrA= Applicable to all sisoellarnoua sesAoes to MAI' rs not included in oboe sectiaeN. dSlitiri boo (R"tlar Tim) Actual ties worked mrawred to the nearest onsrquexter tour and billed at the rate applicable to the employee's salary plus payroll additive of 35%, Labor (Owrtim) Actual tier wodad measured to the nearest one hour and billed at one and one-her T45) ti., the reqular ties rate applicable to the employes s salary plus payroll additive of 35%. ' Trans tatian r nt All vehicles to be billed actual hours or mules as applicable according to the distribution rate (cost to operate) applicable to the vehicle and equipment used. 1 ,-i~a1 Stores cost plus 25% acid applicable sales tax. Othar Coat The ' actual cost for meals and other msiscell¢rwous out-of-pocket expenditures applicable to the ,fob. PAM 6- ELEC1ilIC RATE CRAXt4MM .777 X7" r 77777 -77""' WNW Mzj~ ra~R`"_ 4% Vd:r ~ir~atit MMc Madeq►uae1 ee>diuam CLO hali&ys 0) owwtum will be all hours odlw then voVular timm including City holidsye s and between the hours of 4:00 M and 7:00 AN* 1. Sal for Resale APPUCAT" Resale of electrical energy is limited by the following conditions: 1. Lines will not be extended aver/under lot limes or public right-of-mays. 2. The per unit ch+m ($IXW and $AW) by tho reeeller shall not Bitba plas s wqw cost ad astt chargeby ~ ":ity to the 1 Na eddFacility ~M or oths pro-rata char" rsedexrd as Part ok tree electric Milling, 34 ' Nea+eu►t+r ecst. drvi~.w mat 1 M art accuracy of 260% +atd be gated upon k by.' 016, irltiew►te cwlrgdrr or the City ofeelton utility l~Qarb o lt.RIO intavrtl betam" tests without ctn" to the Witoar1 1 shall not WOMB two (2) years. Cost of tests stall not be sore dM charged by the city wider its otdinetws, In come where the metering is found to be inacouratat the ultimate customer shall be billed or credited for up to 24 months prior usage, 4. Billing dates of ultimate customers shall be within ten (10) working days of the date used by the City for the City billing of the original customer. 5. Records shall be maintained at a City of Denton location for inspection/verification by the City and/or the ultimate customer for not less than the proceeding twelve (12) months. J. Service Deposits APPLICATWN Applicable when a customer requests service for the first time in the Denton electric service area. RATE A residential customer will make a deposit of,$150.00 or an amount equal to 1/6 of the last twelve (12) months billings at the meter location, whichever is greater. PAM 7- FLbJMC `RATE CYiDnWi'.E A Oatow Vul r k of 4=000 W AM iiiiiielk" d i/8 O!' Wt' U b l~ 'bbl at do 1rs~It' or W 0 W*OtWVOV at tho >t1M~e laowd" W many M$ U So Ot0• A 06000im Al cWtow OW Pirdwee a bad Odwid to cover the reed dgmit. D t U ' not r"Alhd &W a *%at: P Who had a " food ; Cr+ldit et xq" .for utility seivt6O with tto City of Oft ton or other eloci'ric utility iirtft for ft twelve (12) OxOte prior to application for service with the cixy of Denton. Depoei. will not be `eq~drrd in the event a customer has a ca-signer who nets the above iteria. MM Or YMIT Deposit will be hold uettil customer has cpipleted twelves (12) oorktizwn, amths with a Sood cmtit sta then with the City of Denton Utility. At ouch tams or upon elwiro the account, a refund of entire deposit plus MW accrued i:stersst will be Made. K' qWiAl Facilities Mder 5Mg& FAGIL Ai170 =0 - (1) Applicability: All service shall be offered from available facilities, if a customer service characteristic raquires facilities 'and devices which are not norarelly supplied by the City acrd sassily available at the location at which the customer requeats service, then the City shall provide the service subject to paragraph 2 of this Section K. (2) The total cost of all facilities required to meet the customer's ird characteristics which are incurrod by the City s'+.al.l IMI subject to a spacial contract entered into between the City and the, customer. This contract shall be signed by hoth parties prior to the City providing service to the customer. PAGE 8- QECIRIC RATE ORDINA= ,Y:Sev°a ? r , .an,~: c~'l.e~ ^F e,*.+x~~•+es ; !n '^"1~'y .~m'"'~" 9 r ART= 116 Sam= Cr RA'1g8 3M= 0= (a R•1) APPLI CN 1+pp icabla ll elsotrid W V140 used for residemisi purposes in a single `Eerily `hc l ar eo Lndi lly awterad apartmant; •uppliod at one point of 1 if ~ one wart: Wh"i u~ is not in a~ocess of 100 IQdt pex 30rdey month 4iri g the bills soesMAX through OChOW. it usage in aany sash ranth exasds 704 billing will rsndered that caonth under Rata BckrdtiSU A- 2 and thereafter for a period extending thft*h the 12 billirng` *x*ka of the next year ehding with the October billing. M MWIIy~ in *m■bsr the custaler my again qualify for the thl rate prided that consumption has not emseded 700 lCi*i Par 30'day m nth during the previmw six suer months. *%M individual dwelliMS unite an b servesd thr * the saw Atis ratan is' of the of tt"a 0 of this ratae and the Iii to the txrMb~c of bilii ag of PUX zhrnugh OCTM eewsed 100 !to times ft dwe i;e~ assts, the billing for Out rontt) sad &Orealtpr will be under Raterde R•24 Na "MM[.Y PAM WUM Sl~!!li Billing months of Billing months of Nov. through April May ttzrough Oct. 1) Customer Facility Charge $5.50/month $5.50/month 2) Energy Charge 4.400/KWH 4.400/KW 3) Energy Cost Adjustment Schedule ECA Schedule ECE1 MIND" BLL LING $5.50/month $5.50/month ME OF SWICE The City will supply single-phase service at any standard voltases available from the City's distribution system through one standard transformation. PASdW Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAM g.. E LAC1Rl'C RATE C)RDINAN(E .fe ...;v k~.m s'o-'.~^NS ;:v*,C'k..r. vi- s '-M1 ^r _C^.tv Pr+ .^'.r cr^ 4~ ' ' III 1~ All aatde" which r"Aft modal fiailida in Or4o r to got curt~aMr~ • eervi xpu rrw00, a "I be pravid«d A**t to the special saw IWO ri4wo ~ aE trr~trrr~t area a) Mllb* for the Facility chase ahal.l be based oca 12 billi o .nx,ally. formula: Actual W, in readiru period x castoaex SLAM 30 amm Ow Au"m A oherge per KWH of enwV taken for fuel cost calculated in accodance with Schsdsle E.C.A. I PAGe 10- ELECTRIC itA'IE btZDIYVA= 't 'e?sq.caacm;7~17°:s^, 777 m7sr.weWfiT. 7 7 MOM' Applicable to any customer for all electric service used for residential p~apowa in am it vwkwlpriveto dwalli % or an lndividt ally metww Wit, wjVPIUw at one point of delivery 0.4 me aand dwo* one peter. Also applicable to any customer hot" with olwtrlc energy, rasiatancme or but pump, a wlicable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, standby, or $Wleftntary service wMaPtt in conjunction with applicable rifts, dMOMRM Billing menthe of Billing months of Nov. ftou;h April May throu*h Oct. 1) Customer Facility Charge Single Ruse $ 6.50/month $ 6,S0/month Three phase $11.00/month $11.00/month 2) Energy Charge First 1,000 KWH 4,900/KWH All additional KWH 4.40c/KWH Fist 3,000 KWH 5.30J/KWH All additional KM 5.808/KWH 3) Energy Cost Adjustment Schedule ECA Schedule FAG PAGE 11- Et YC CRATE MDINAN(,E ri 7 !4~ 5 6 ~ ~0% ~ 6 ~ lElhorkh gKVtClt TfIK OF The City will supply singlo-Aaas service (or tha~M+`OUMIN service if available at the point of CIelivMry) at sixty (60) cycles and at air standard voltteaes available frM the City' a distribution aystere thm* one atandard transformation, Where service of the type desired by the cvstosrr is not already available at the point of serviw s special contract arrangematts between the City and the custooer may be required prior to its being furnished. Bills &M due when'rendered$ and bacare past due if rat PW within 15 calendar days fray data of issuance. SMIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subJect to the special facilities rider. MURATION OF VrILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings WW%Ally. Formula: Actual days reading period x customer charge b) Billing for the w*W charge shall be ' based on 30 days per month to determine the KWH conmWtion to be chargad to each rate block. PAGE 12- EiEGTRIC RATE OWL`1A= +.57*rn xn9^°'S4 S Tyr--"°."^FSt9'°*r'n.-. S"+!^.rie...na.x..,..y.w n, Aatu d~eln 3st b in To* black x No* per i~a r~ hloaic * pp K1 1 Of WAWV tdW !oe lual oat oalaaIxt*d in aooordrewah Sc~~dul~ Q.C.A. PAGE 13- E LWMIC RATE ORDINOM r I L (Ctr~1)~ ~u V AMS (Mmmu _.p APPLICATUN Applicable to any customer for all electric service aupplLed at one point of delivery and measured through one Prater with customer ptwiding all facilities necessary to receive primary voltage service. Not Applicable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, standby or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NM 1*11H.Y MM 1) Customer Facility Charge $49.50 per month 2) Dam" Charge $5.20 per KW of demand 3) Fmrgy Charge 3.500/DU for all KWH 4) Energy Cost Adjustment Current WA Factor ML41" BILLING An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below, but not lee, then seventy percent (70`X) of the monimum monthly demand charge for any month during the preceding months of May through Octoher plus $49.50 per, 30 day billing. TYPE OF SERVICE Primary voltage service (transformation equipment owned by customer) is available to any customer with a 12-month minimut monthly demand of 750 KW or greeter. Primary service rendered at one point on the custame0 s premises at a nominal voltage of 13,200 volts or 69,000 volts three-phase at the option of the City. The primary voltage service customer shall own, operate, And maintain all facilities necessary to receive three phase primary voltage service and all transformation facilities requirod for conversion to utilization voltage. The City shall own, operate and maintain all metering facilities, either at primary or secondary voltage, at the City's option. Where the City elects to meter at secondary voltage, two percent shall be added to the Ae=A charges the energy charge and the enargy cost adjustment charge to account for transformer losses. PAS~SFNT Bills are due when rendered, and became past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAM 14- FL9CMC RA'Tt ORDINANI:E 17 via To d1omd shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute of maxiasw uM dui the ou rent month as detimind by City a demon m etw o but rot limn then 70% of the mwoftse monthly KW similmrl i detetaircwrd 6ming the previous billing months of MAY through OCTOBER in the 12 srxWha anding with the current month, nor UMS than 750 KW, Pam FACTOR The City reeervws the rat to make tests to determine the power factor of the custom ar's instaIlation ssryod during periods of or by cu of the average pow factor ox the matt y bins period. If Chrrrt pvwrrr factor is below nU gty percent, the demand for billing purposes wilt, bo deterrad4ed by multiplying the uncorrected KW billing desmW by 90% and dividing by the determined power factor. 4" FACII.YTIES SW All servtose which require special facilities in order to meet custom's service requirements shell be provided subjftt to the spacial facilities rider. PR RA= OE MIM BUI S AL) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings amually. Formula: Actual data reading period x customer charge 30 b) Billing for demand h411 be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods. Formula: Actual days in readi, pericxf x KW demand x Rate 3U days EMM COST ADIL STMEtTI' A charge per KM of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule K.C.A. PAM 15- E=MC RATE OR UMCE t StHIMIE G! app able to caworroW And induttrial, users for all electric service supplied at one point of delivery and msasursd through one Qri~.aar„ Y voltage meter. Transfonoticn equipment is owned by the City. Mot standby or wpplame tort' service, except i n~unnct~ion witch ap¢l=10, rider. NET " M'MLY RAZE 1) Facility QSgP $49,50/month 2) Energy Chsacp 3.70/" 3) Demand Charge $5.351KW 4) Energy Cost Adjustment Current MA Factor mom BnAjM An amount eq-*1 to the demand charge as calculated below but not less than aaventy Pero" t (70X) of the max4mt monthly demand charge for any ri 30 dray breced months of May through October, inclusive, $ plus ing. TYPE OF SEWI E The City will supply three-phase service at sixty (60) cycles and at any sta;dard Voltages available from the City's distribution system. Where service of the type desired by the customer is not already available at tl* point of service, special' contract arrangements between the City and the custmar may be required prior to its being furnished. PAYMENT , . Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 days from date of issuance. Dt"~UThON O F IDM V The demand shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute period of maximum use during the current month as determined b}~yy `City's demand meter, but not less than 70% of the maxima monthly KW similarly determined the previous billing months of MAY OCMBQt in the 12 enaing with the current month, nor LM than KW. PAGE 16- ELE=C RAZE OYZMAN(E 4 f, PC= IVAL'lC1l oft city reeerws the right to =W teso to deter m$m the power fact of the customer's installation served during periods of m►exlarw 44000 of by ant of tits +rv~ex'ap po~,x factor for the aiaathiy dassctd biller~ If the power factor is below ci ty wow the too for billpu:GposQa will be dstetmired by multiplying the uncorrected KW billing damand by 90% and dividing by the determined power factor4 FACILITJES Al} services which require special facilities in order to meet the customer s service r piremrRnts shall be provided subject to special facilities ridar$ PRoAATiw of UTILITY eu Ls a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings amually. Fot)astlai Actual d i readic period x customer vt~rtes 30 b) BV ling for deasnd,shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and protated for longer or shorter billing periods. Formula: Actual days in reading period, x KW demand x Rate 3 days MMM COST ABJLM*M A charge per KW of energy taken for fuel coat calculated in accordance wito Schedule E.C.A. PAGE 17- FLWMIC RAZE ORDiNA= 77- (Son= CE) Applicable to any commercial and industrial, ulcers fot• all electric service supplied at one point of delivery and moaaured through one mater. Not Mp I,&cpble to reaele service in any event, nor to temporary, standby or supplementary service IMMt in conjunction with applicable Ma jY11LY RATE 1) Custmor, Facility Change Simla Phsse 05.00 0.00 per month Thsw Phase per month 2) Dom" Charge $5.50 per KW of doe" 3) M*W Charge 3.9000 for all KW 4) Energy Coat Adjustment Currant DG Factor BIIJ.IDIG tGEM An amount "Al to the demand charge as calculated below but not less than seventy percent (70x) of the amino monthly demand charge fo any month during the preceding moc►ths of May through October plus $10~ month for single phase or less than $15/month for three phase, per 30 day billing. TYPE OF SMVICS Secondary service available to commercial and industrial customers. The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and 'It any standard voltages available from the City's distribution system through one standard transformatIon. Where service of the desired by the customer is not already available at the point of" service, special contract arracgaments between the City and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. PA*W Bills are due when rendered, and became past due if not paid within 13 calendar days from date of issuance. PACE 18- hZZC11tYC RATE ORD MA= y i, rim" t ~ .1t~ k! 61~13► ~i hMii~M ' y I~lii, 'M~ktl~► tlsta l ~soe~ths~ w eMcurrsnt a~ogth Ift no em" 11 des" be leis than 1 W In caps where the caMocted loved is constant, the City mays at it's option, estimate the KW demand. For neon signs, one volt ampere shall be considered the equivalent of 3/4 watt. P'OWFIt F'AL'L 7ba City reserves the riaht to make testa : to determine the power factor of the customer's inatalaticn served during periods of m+ud~quipo, demand or by measurement of the average power factor for the monthly ~g period. If the power factor is below ninety percent, the dam" for billing purposes will ba determined by multiplying the uncorrected KW billing demand by 90x and dividing by'the determined power factor, SPECM FACILITIES All asrAA*s which require special fmilitirs in order to moat customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. F"EtOMnON OF MILITY OW a) Billing for the Facility chap shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge 30 b) Billing for demand shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods. Formula: Actual days Li reading period x KW demand x Rate 30 days ENERGY COST ADJUSTIENr A charge per ' KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule E.C.A. PAGE 19- ELECTRIC RATE ORDII*rFCE LOOM lu AppUceblo to any local City, C xit or School DiatxieCs for all eleatrin iwavice supplied at ona point of delivery and mseaured through oae swan. Not l r,a~bbU to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, standby or auE , N'mAtary service a omit in conjunction with applicable rider NET {1NTELX RM 1) Custce P, Chaxp Single Plase 110,00 00 per month par 2) DawW Qwp $3.00 per XW of dem-od 3) Energy Chards 3.90E per KWH for ell RM 4) Energy Cost MjUrt .nt QAVW* WA Mtn ~ An amount equal to the dem od charge as calculated below but not less than fifty percent (50x) of the mod- O'A moothlyydemand charge fo any month during the preoW4ng months 'of May through October plus 10. 007 month for single `phase or less than 315.00 month for three phase, per 30 day billing. TYPE OF SERVICE The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cyclis and at any standard voltages available from the City's distribution system thro&g one standard transformation. Where service of the type desired by the customer is not already available at the point of service, special contract arrangements between the City and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. PAVOW Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 20- ELECTRIC PLATE CRUMANCE - 1 be do IN ► dint is L~raa of =mat M uM ro~ith lad by GYty d~tdi~b~nr. Us City reserves the ~ to mMe teats to determine the power faatw of ft a utomer' a itwtellatiAn served, during pKiod~ of mR r*0 domed or by araeuromoat of the averap power factor for the aaathly bill iv g perLal. If the factor is belcm ninety percent, the demand for billing purposes will be determined by multiplArs the uwxwrectod KW billing dwmW by 90% and dividirg by the determined power factor. SM" FAC.Ii.ITId;B All serviosa which require special facilities in order to mat customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF VrIU7Y en. S Kiting for the Facility charge stall be based on 12 billings ally. FoM": Actual cam, ,nit »eriiod x custwer chum 30 b) Billing for damaad shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods. Fotmila: Actual days _in reading period x KW demand x Rata 0 days ENERGY 006T ADJUST HM A charge per OM of energy taken for fuel coat calculated in accordance with Schedule E:.C.A. PAZ 21- EL MIC RATE ORDIKM AP Applicobl+e to all str+Nt 1itl.e~ pradd within tha city of Despot and provided to the City' a# Denton , another City or that T"68 DeparCrat of shays and Publio Trawportation. HM U RAZE 1) Facility Charge 2) Energy Cost MJustMt Current MA x monthly bulb wattage factor Bulb WAtt4s Factor 100W Sodium vapor 5450 48 A14 wxith 2%W Sodium.Vapor 6600 105 IWl oooth 40OW Sodium Vapor 10,25 159 td ift- th ON fury' Vapor 5:50 70 :Z* nth 250W Mee~cuurY Vapor 8000 98 death 400w MercAcy Vapor 10:25 153 W month 1000W MecWy Vapor 119,00 380 Y, WWnth The City will supply single-ph"a services (or three-phase service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at standard volt*Vs available from the City's distribution system one standard transtormation. Where Service of the type desired by the customer is not already available at the point of serviw, special contract arrangements between the City and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. PA'D= Hills are due when reordered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PRCRATIOoV OF UnUTY _ B n S a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually, Formula: Actual days in readioet period x customer charge 30 ENERGY WBT A1VUS MERr A charge per 'KWi of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule E.C.A. PAGE 22 ELECTRIC RATE CliDINANCE 4 I 00 iii M b B (S AMUCCM lppliaable to State a-4 Local Ccwstt m* apcies that install and asintatn their own street lights and traffic signals. W' MONMY RAZE All A 4.901 per RM TYPE OF SFK= At the City's available socondary voltap and phase. PA*W Sills are dus when rsmdsred, and become put due if not paid within 15 calsmdar days frcm data of issusnce. Maintenance enepenses billed at cost. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to asset custollar's aervice requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. ENEWY COST A charge per KIJF; of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule E.C.A. PAM 23- ELECWC RAZE CRDIIVM (SCHMUZ D-0) APPUCATUV Applicable to any customer within the area served by the City's electric distribution system for outdoor area lighting when such lighting facilities are operated as an extension of the City's distribution system. NEP MORMY RATE 1) Facility Charge 2) En thy, Cost Adjustment Current ECA x monthly bulb wattage factor bulb Wattage Factor 100W Sodium Vapor 7,400 ~+8 abiittt SOOIa Vapor 91000 . 4 W SadU* Vapor 134V 1ST age . ' r 6 ~ V r4ercury apo~/ 17 ~t V month 40OW Mercury Vapor 1.1.00 1Sg3 i onth *No new or additional 250 watt mercury vapor lamps wi11' be installed after the effective date of this schedule. 'T'YPE OF SERVICE The City shall furnish, install, maintain and deliver electric service to automatically controlled, mercury or sodium vapor lighting fixtures conforming to the City's standards and subject to its published rules and regulations. Where necessary for proper illumination or where existing pokes are inadequate, the City will install or cause to be installed, one (I pole for each installed light, at a distance not to exceed eighty (80'~ 'feet from said existing lines, at no charge to the customer. Each additional pole span shall noc exceed a span spacing of one hundred (100') feet. Additional poles required to install a light in a customer's specifically desired location, and not having a light installed on same, shall bear the cost. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 24 E= WC RATE ORDDWM • TM =M= A two (2 year vantrat stMit be + d to and s by 0-s^h au . 1- 1 4"Wro Dusk•to Dmmp Lightie Service au thorlstng i fixed sM~lkhly oh=lzge sib 11, aes event ed to be cApplied, ustom to the the In the that a customer desired ed the of the unit or discontimmma of the service prim to completion of two (2) years, the reminder of the contract period shall became due aid payable, After the and of the initial two (2) year contract, service shall contmns on a mooth•to-moth basis and vay be cancelled by either party upon thirty (30) days notice. SPECIAL FACILrrit custcsll serviao ewhich requires apeoial facilities in order to meet the cuslowr ties uruder# requirements m T11 be provided subject to special facili MU TUN OF ITTI M BjW a) Billing for the Facility chap shall be based on 12 billings actually. Fonula: Actual days in reading Period x customer charge 30 ENUM OUST A charge per " of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in ac,ordance with Schedule E.C.A. PACE 25- ELWMC ELATE ORDINANCE 4 ~J) (SOMU T11 terra or sa cueUmp, requests electric service on a short temporary basi# ICT MORNLY RATE 1) Facility Singe 10,00/moth T hria Phase 113,00/moth 2) Energy Charge 6.1e/tart 3) Energy Coat Adjustment Current ECA M SIIL= $10400/10onth TYPE OF AERVICE At the city's available 120/240 volt single phase secondary $%*ply. PAYMFNf- Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of isauance. Awn=%L Tommy gy. mcE amain Labor (Pegular Time) .70 minlaaa up to 1 hour. 36.70 for each additional hour (to be measured to the nearest one-quarter hour). Labor ((hoertime) $48,70 minimum up'io l hour. $48.70 for each additional hour (to be measured to the nearest one-quarter hour). Premium time to be added where applicable. Transportation To be billed by hours or miles, as applicable, according to the estimated cost of operating `the equipment, PAGE 26- E WMIC' RATE ORDUMCE Matexd.al MAhaarisi that cairtinot be vo&W to be ballad at Stoma cost plus 25% and applicable sales tax. At the ties a te~oporary service is r*W* or cmmrted, any loss in the m4orial inatalled due to negligance or willful action by the customer will be bailed s tely to customer at Stores cost plus 25% sates tax, SPECIAL FACILI'PIES All services which require special' facilities in order to meat the customer's service requirameats shall be provided subject to special facilities rider. Sea Section 25-23(e) for standard requirements. PliOtill QN OF WILL'1"Y 9= a) eilling for the Facility charge shell be based on 12 billings annAlly. Poroula: Actual days in reading period_ x customer cheucee 3U E COST` AWUS'IMWr A charge per kW of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule E,C.A$ PAGE 27► EECMIC RATZ OttDYN M ♦ OF= gg Applicable to approved electric service required for aecOndfAry distribution service at voltage levels not to wmeed 480 volts 1) Sir4le PhPha~se 00/santh Three Phase ~.00/loath 2) Energy Charge: Billing months of June thrcugh Septewber; 12:00 Noon through 91100 poa, 8.54 per KW 9.,00 p.m. through 12;00 Now 3.70 per 16M Billing months of October through May; All KW 3.74 per KWH 3) Demand Charge: $5.50 per mouth per KW for all KW of billi4 demand. 4) Energy Cost Adjustment; Current ECA An amount equal to tlla demand charge as calculated below but not less than seventy percent (70x) of the maximum monthly KW similarly dstarmined duriN the previous billing months of MAY through OCrOM in the 12 months ending with the current month, nor LESS than 750 KW- TYPE OF SEWICE Secondary service available to commercial and 3.ndustrial customers, The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at arty standard voltages available from the City's distribution system through one stwmk~ transformation. Where service of the type desired by the custoar is not already available at the point off_ service, special contract arrargsments between the City and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. PAGE 28- ELE7f1tIC ELATE CRDll!3AM or The KW lad motored durir4 the 1S-mute period of moriaus use during the current month's peak, billiryt periods from 12100 Noon 9:00 pOm., not lesa tt* 0% of the =Udmm monthly IR sfad~y determined during the previous billing 040ths of MAY through O(,"InW in the 12 months ending with the current montso PAYhM Bills are duo when rendareds aM bores past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. NO FAC1q[t The City reserves the aright to melee testa to determine the power factor of the user's installation served hereunder during periods of maxims demand for the monthly billing period. Should the power factor so determined by below ninety (90x) p6ecsnt, the demand for bill purpawa will be detotsined by multiplyy the uncorrected KW bill demand by ninety (90x) percent and diviing by the deteroinad power factor. SPECIAL FAMITIM All service which requires special facilities in order to most the customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to special facilities rider. PRORATION OF MMATY BIU a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually, Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge 30 b) Billing for demsnd shall be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for longer or shorter billing periods. Formula; Actual clays in reader x KW demand x Rate 30 days ENE4W COST ADJUSTTlW A charge per iClM of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule E.C.A. I PAGE 29- E EMIC RATE WINANCE RW'A1i (TO Ap,~[.I, C11T'iGN Applicable to approved electric service required for primary voltage distribution service at voltage levels rot to exceed 69,000 volts and billing demand equal to or greater then 750 KW. NET "M MY 1) Qmtasrr Facilities Charge $60400 per month 2) Energy Charge: Billing months of Jura through September 12:00 Now through 9:00,psm. 8,U per am 9:00 p.m. through 12:00 Noon 3.36 per KWH Billing months of October through April All ON a 3.4 per DM 3) Demand Charge: $5.20 per month per KW for all KW of billing demand. 4) Energy Cost Adjustment: Curratt ECA MINDW BILLING An amount equal to the demand charge as calculated below but not less than seventy percent (70x) of the maximum monthly KW similarly determined during the previous billing months of MAY through OCMW in the 12 months ending with the current month, nor LESS than 750 KW. Dt'raWINAT= Op ICES" The KW load metered during the 15-minute period of maxisim use during the current month's peak billing periods from 12:00 Noon through 9:00 p.m., but not less than 70% of the maximum monthly` KW similarly determined during the previous billing months of MAY through OC`MM in the 12 months ending with the current month, nor LESS than 750 IN. TYPE Of SERVICE At the City's available primary voltage and phase. PAGE 30- UACIRIC RATE 0RDDW E g111s ar• due MIMa rends. and become past due if not paid within 15 "Under days fee date of issuance. FAL'1CIt The City reserves the right to awls tats to deterepin a the power factor of the user's installation nerved hereunder during periods of maxima demond for the monthly billiur period. shasld the porter iakor so determined be below ninety (90%) pyyer~~cawtt o the demand for billing I purposes will be deft=insd factor. M bY ninoty (90% Percent multi dividi byththe ddetandn ed powerr All service which requires Special facilities in order to meet the tamer's service requirements shell be provided subject to special facililities rider. P[ fAT LA (W crrn OM Bps e) Billing for the Facility char$a shall be bleed on 12 billings an%Ally. Formula; ctuAl g reading period x customer charge 30 b) Billing for demand al-All be calculated on a 30 day per month basis and prorated for lor4per or shorter billing periods. Formula: Atma days in gIgging period x KW De=-A x R$te 30 MMGY COST M i A charges par KM of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule R.C.A. PAGE 31" Ei.WWC RATE CRDDWM I (SCHMME PI) AMiLAM Applicable to all customers taitiry{ primary service at a firm power load exceeding 5,000 KYA during the mantis, of June, July, August or September, NET MOMMY gm 1) Facility Charge x+9.50/month 2) Energy charge 3.9i/lbM 3) Dsmand Charge $4.50/DM 4) Energy Cost Adjustment Current ECA When the City regA%" a customer to interrupt Toed and the custcrr elects not to interrupt hU lad, then the following rates shall apply for all 0 and ON the City requested to be interrupted: Energy Charge: The actual cost of all ICI purchased by the Electric Department necessary to serve the customer's load adjusted for losses. Demand (urge The actual cost of all KW purchased by the Electric Departameot necessary to service the customer's load adjusted for losses, PA)d IW Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. MLNDLM BUAX4G An mount equal Co the demand charge as calculated below but not less than seventy percent (70%) of the maximum monthly KW similarly determined the previous billing months of MAY thrg OCMM in the 12 months ending with the current month, nor LESS that 750 KW. TYPE OF SEttVICE Primary voltage service (transformation equipment owned by custcaoor) is available to any customer with a 12-month minimum monthly AmAnd of 750 KW or greater. Primary service rendered at one point at the customer's premises at a nmkinsal voltage of 13,200 volts or 69,000 .wits three-phase at the 1 tion of the City. PAGE 32• CAM= Ct= CRDINAMCE P: 'RM Of voltage 64TVi" Cwtosesmr libel l oNn, OPftWM t and ~n O►3,7. itiM necessary to cMoeiw dose Ow* prift"Y volts" serViM OW all trwagoveptim facilities required for conversion, to util4WWJdM voltOPO Ths City shall otim, OPOMe and maintain all aver faailitiu, sittuer at primary or secondary voltso$ at the Uri ity a option. Where the City elects to ester at secondiry voltage two percent shall be added to the demand charge, the energy charms the stw V cost adjustment charge to account for transfot~eetr losses. ~'r7C11 or ODWO The demand shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute period of mauilaa use during the current month as determim>td by City's demand me dstertimd ter, but not less thm 70% of the asoelmw<. monthly KW similarly the 12 during the Previous billies awrltly of MAY through OC'rOM in sOnthd *Ming with the current monthf nor LESS than 750 M CSf'DI'x m or pal The City shall notify the custoarr by tsl *aw at loot thirty (30) NUNtes Prior to the time at +which the load is required to be curtailedo The request shall be for all or part of the "toot Ia load .ooceedinmg 5,000 KVA, The msxiwr period, of interruption shall be for six hours. The interruption shall be at the request of the City during the periods when a p5tential forced outage could deny ppaoww~~ser to other oustamars or when available spi~nniog reserves are threatened. Th0 customer shall respond by suiting he will or will not comply with the city 's rsgwst within fifteen (15) minutes after notification. PCiWU FACTOR k'I~UItffi~IFN15 AND AC►1(7S'V AM Thp CiLY reserves the right to make teats to determine the power factor of the user's installation served hereunder during periods of =durum demand for the monthly billing periods$ Should the power factor so determined be below ninety (90X) percent, the dem" for billing purposes will be determined by multiplyyi the uncorrected ItW billing demand by ninety (90X) percent and dividing by the determined power factor. SPECIAL FACILITIES All service which requires special facilities in order to meet the cutoaer's service requirements shall be provided subject to special facilities rider. PRORAnON OF UI'IUTY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: PALE 33- B.OC"I= RAZE QDEWM ActW d in YMrditlt 7C ttWtc~st' Gt1ax*! b) RillUg for dwwxW shsll ba ealcuht~d pt1 a 3 doy per month basis " proratad for longer or shorter billU* periods, Formula: & 1 v$ in reading perit~d x KW D&wW x Rate C49M COST ADJUS'ITW A chap pair KW of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in aowrdsnce with Schedule E.C.A. PAGE 34- aECT1tIC WE dItDRN MM min Applicable to any facility used pruortly for religious woraship, educations and meetiM Vernon's knwtated Texas statutes (V,A,T,C.) guidelims for property tax exomption as a religious orsanizatiOA, Not available for resale, Ner MON'tlB,Y BILZJW 1} Facility le Pawr" l 110:~/mcnth Three Phew 15/month 2) Energy Charge 4,00M 3) Demand Charge 3,401KW 4) EnMW Coat Adjustment Corr nt WA M~iIMh! BIILINa An aeeamt actual to the demairi charge as calculated below but not less than fifty percent (50x) of the maximum monthly demand charge for jaw month during the preceding months of May through October Plus S10/month for single phasb or less than g15/month for three phase, per 30 day billing. TYPE OF SFR= The City will supply single-phase service (or threes-phase service if available at the point of delivery at sixty (64) cycles acxh at any at*-Aard voltages evadable from the sty's distribution system tt%*c%4 i one standard transformation. Where service of the type desired by the custcar is not alteady available at the point of service, special contract arrangements bet~ the City and 'the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. PAItW Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. DF,'-K4nKMN OF DEMATD The demand shall be the KW supplied during the 15-minute period of maximum use during the current month as determined by City's demand meter. PACE 35- E ZMMC RATE OgDMANCE y.. ;..mow..:..' . ~ ..r•i _ rtrs -..'m--,+.~, TT'~^_^'-.,,~'-^-Ira ...~...--i; 77 imams AU swv$aw w44h VOWLIe SPO" feotlid" it ordw to least cusu On ssrvk* soquirawts shall be pwridod "Joct to the spooial facilid" rigor. MMM ar t!1'LI= Buis Bi,llits for consumption atd drrrcd shall be calculated on a 30-4ry basis asd prorated for longer or skmter billing periods. a) Bolin` for the Facility charge shall bo bawd on 12 billings amually. Formula: dixarc period x customer char mtusi &n re, b) bi'iiift for desand shall be caloul&tod on a 30 day per month basis atd pmostnd Bblr longer or shottor billing perri,odss Foteula: Actual da gja readies p~riyd x 1W demand x Rate 30 days ENMGY OWr AQJlS MMr A ehatgM Kith at energy taiasn for fuel cost calculated in accordance with Schedule B.C.A6. PAM 36~ QEC'ri= RATE 0ilgTNANCE 09 UM AFlK.YCATI(!i Applicable to all electric sft" ce metered at oM point for use to light specified areas for athletic avrnts where such electrical use will not occur between the hours of 10;00 A,M, and 6100 p,M, NET' MO mLy PATz 1) Customer Facilities Charge Single Phase 20,00 per moth :30-00 per month 2) Energy Charge 6100 PM to 10:00 AM 4 o10 per KWH 10;00 AN to 6:00 PM 8010 pax KWH 3) DwWW (urge $1.00 per KW per month 4) Energy Cost Adjustment Current WA MIM M BILLING Facility Charge PYP'!r: OF' _5IIt1TYC At the City's available secondary voltage and available phase. 'For use only between the hours of 6:00 P.M. and 10:00 A.M. from May through October. PASCW Bills are d,,,q when renderad, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. DE'lIIi2lIl'1A'1'IW OF DWM The demand shall be the KW supplied durii)g the 15-minute period of maximum use durii* the current month as determined by City's demand meter. +1 I -17 *4 CIO iyMfSIM~ tdfs to a" tests to, datats~ m ft pass f aboe of ft cuet~r a i qr► .*A aft""d &,.*L% P+~ of mtimm or by Ims of #0 svP. a "Ov anctrs isotar Loir the Nonthly thw► fact t' i bi i.nity psrownt s the nbi l purposes will be d dr~d by oultiplyir* tits undo= t W k~ billivg I IL4 by 90% sad dividire by the determined power factor. All serdaw vhtch re isl facilities in OLdar to meet cusborrrto service trquinsw @W be provided subject to 6a special facilitiee rid". PST -0 Or 1MM Dl a) billies t*r ter Facility chars shall be based on 12 billings srxaa~lly. ~brulat ~ ~ swdLat d x custwmer b) 8illfre for dMUr 4 shal1 be talculated on a 30 day per aor~eh basis and prorated for loop t or shorter billing periods. Fonula; Actual ~ yss4tm period x ,~w dssend x lists ENERGY CC6T ADJ-UOWM A change per KM of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in accordance 'with Schadulm, E.C.A. 2. The total ccAt of all facilities required to most the custcoat's load characteristics 4dch are imu rred;by the City ahall be subject to R special ee►► contract shall oootrect se&earad into ba"Wa the City and the customer. lfi~ be sigosd by both parties prior to the City providing service to the customer. PAGE 38- FlW= RATE OR n#= 77 am M cI WAI All oonthly MM charges 4*11 be increased ' of dMOT0660d by an aea unt a*l to IV amts per M. to be ' Wom a the 4kpst~t cost e4jummoot (WA), The WA shall be ocip~ttaQ in the Mootlts of April, OAW October to be applW to do followitsf of yy Chia It October and November th ~hApri 1 vaspectivoly. "tty kilted in no care chset the energy cat xi sore d*n twice in either of the six ( ) aenths pariods. The WA shall be calculated by the following fay wlat 1 (Winter) • Pwisc$4 MYAM no Car wumor , WA (&awr) !MjS$4 MM" cost k L rc+o I• • "os'suaae~" 7ho abaw fomala rsrults in Winter '19WSS and _ & ae t 1963 >d AO as followrt E ~&mer)' 22,25 . in the event that actual OMW1410ivw costs of fuel, VWU610 costs of Texas Municipal Power (02,A) anerv and purchased aterv (pludiva 'IRA's fixod is greater then or lass then t cuaaulatiw SCA rovu>tna by $1, ►OOf} , the i+t4a1 ywr, the City racaaputo the Snev& Cost Adjustawnt artd rewytabli h an WA that co lects or retwav such difference over the rewti0ing months of the fiscal year, &seh cheep in nCA shall be applied evenly to all ressUA g months' FAA. PAGE 39- SIC MM MDIlVAM aua 77,- 77o:-7777UAt if air MICCiMo subOctiMt PaCCaR O$ "N"1000 Clause. OM" or M001d in this orftm ae or applicattao t!»mf to any Pereca or oimmimtavm is held in waid' by WW court of oampstant J risdiation, such holdiz{ shall not affect the V4114ity' of the "MinixV portUrA of this ord3~$ and the City Council of the City of Dentwo Tomas hereby decXsrar it would' haw macted +tich rumeinire PwtJAxw dWits soy such inv4idity4 Imm me. That this osdirmice sW1 become affective on Dwembw 1, 1994; provided, hmr4wo that the pt+ovisiom of Article 'II, "Schedules of Rath"o shall be eftectiviss applied to and be allecrd as all billiap made an or alter Deoamber . 1, 1994. MM AM AF!lIOMmi 'n11s the ~&W of ~ I*Ks mum Cm Cr Ow"t 1F.XA.S I A7`i' : CITY Cr Dw11 O ~'IF. m APFAM AS TO IS= - FW: Cl ,OF ' wAS PAGE 40- BEC = MM ORDINANCE { AN ORDIMMS RSPSALINC TICLS III sad IV OF CNAI'TSK 2$ OF Tlit CODS OF OOINANOSS KttAQ'~INQ * NEW ARTICLE IIi~~ OF CNAPTSK 25 Or THN CODS OF oKDINAACts TO tKOVIDt FOR TM SSTAILISHINO OF MTIS CHARM FSSS, Dt"SITS, SILLIN S AND PiWCSWW loll PKOV OU4 MAMA ;10 SWU SEKVICS BY Oi1DINANCt{ AND DSCLAKINO AN Z?ftCTIVE DATA. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, NEREEY ORDAINS. SECTION I. That Article III and IV of Chapter 25 of the Coda of Ordinances are hereby repealed in their entirety. SECTION II. That a new Article III of Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances io hereby enacted which shall read as followst AKTICLS III. WATSIt AND So= SYEVICE Sec. 2S-21* The rates chargge4, fees, deposit* bi.ltiols and procedures for pror~iclina water sad sam er s/rt►lQa by the 'City to its ouatowr• N~►i11; M eatabliebed add be is aocordaaea Mlrh ordiaa'~rcar adopted, mad to frog tine-to•tiae awadod, by the City Couaoil, the ordinances cad aaeadwdts thereto to be kApt on file with the Cit:r Saoretaryy and to be available for inspection by the public durinj rolular business hours. SECTION III. That Article IV is hereby reserved for future use. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become affective when the ordinance adopted pursuant to Section II0 above$ becomes offective, a copy of which shall be atteohed hereto. PASSED AND APPROVED this the ,day of , 19ri4. KICMW 6. SMART, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS KAY51 ATTEST. CIT OF DENTON,,TEXAAS APPROVED AS TO LEW4 FORM. C OF OENTON, TEMS r. t iXd.. .n xp• La 2 y .m.r ~ n _.~y rii. ~ ~ii ^ ~ i it ti. Oct"aber 160 1944 CITY C06NCIL AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Consider Proposed Water and Sewer Rate Ordinance, SUMMARY: For the, past five months, the Utility Staff has been conductingg an is.house study of the water amd sewer rates. An Executive Summary of the study is attached and a co py'of the study was included with the Council Agenda packet for the Council's October 2, 19840 meeting, The, study pprovides background for a water rate increase of about 10.77% with minor changes in the sewer- rates and the only increase being the industrial water rate' (S5) whi,ch is primarily sold to the City's steam electric production plant for use in the cooling towers. FISCAL SUMMARY: Present Proposed Revenue Percent Rates Rates_ _ Increase Increase 1484`46 FY Expected L °Revenues $6ol57,621 $5,757,113 :559,592 $10.77% i ACTION REQUIRED: 1. Approval of Rates; This will allow the Department of Utilities to continue to operate in an efficient manner with sufficient funds to meet its obligation through the 1984-85 fiscal year. 2. Rejection of'Rates: This will cause an operating loss of about '$490,000 in the City's' water service area with rates and other revenues not paying for the opdratih4 and non-operatieq costs of the water services, RECOMMENDATION: The Public 'Utilities Board una'himously recommends the proposed,rates for adoption by the City Council. The Board rode their recommendation at their meeting of September 25, 1984. Rospectfu11y► R, E, Net stir Director of 'Util hies EXHIBIT I outi`ve Summary- 1984-Ra~ to Study iI roposed 0edinance- Water/Sewer Rates III Minutes- PUB Meeting of 9/25/84 717 7 r:" J ' I r PUBLIC UTILttlt$ 60 0 MIBT144 September 25, 1984 S:OO PM Civil Defense Room Members Present: Roland Laney, Chairman; }.eonard Herring, Edward Coomes, Nancy Boyd, John Th6mRson Staff Present: R, E. NoIion, Ernie TulIos, David Ham, Charles Cryan, John' McGrane Others: Jon Waist, Denton Record Chronicle Absent: G. Chris Hartung 1. CONSIDER UTILITY RATES: Herring made a motion -to recommend p Opose utility rates as amended to the City Council. Thompson second. Five ayes, no nayes, motion carried. The Board adjourned at 6:50 PM to the City Council Chambers for a Joint City Council/Public Utilities Board `meeting, MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING September 250 1984 7:00 PM City Council Chambers Present: Mayor Stewart and Members of the City Council R, Chris Hartung Public Utilities Board members and Staff Jon Waist- Denton Record Chronicle 1. CO SIDER ISSUANCE OF CITY OF DENTON UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE c es Board me er, Boyd, m e a o n to ecommend to the council acceptance of the bid of Raueher' Pierce, et al, at 10,29665 average interest rate for $20 million of Utility Revenue Bonds. Thompson second, five ayes, no nayes, motion tarried. T40 above recommendation was presented to the Council by Chairman Laney. The Board then adjourned from the Council meeting at 7:45 PM. 3271U ExtOUTXVE '"U04 AY A> 1994 Electrio 1r water Rate Study A policy developed by the Public Utilities Board and City Uokincil in 1961 recommends annual review of utility rates, Such a review should determine (1) whether existing rates will pay for all Operating costs, capital costs and debt service and transfers to general government, (2) wilethei: economic and/or system efficiencies may be obtained from restructuring the rates, and (1) whether the rates capture customer cost 'of service, The staff has reviewed the existing rates and other available information to provide the Board and Counoil with the backup for rate changes, As the Council and Hoard are aware, all utility service rates were increased in t11q 1983-84 fiscal year. Tne electric rates came, into offect inN ve& / dnd water and sewer rates in March, At the beginning of 1983-841 staff had estimated system growth at four (4%) percent for electric and three and one-half (3, x) percent for water and sewer. These estimates produced expected sales of 533 million kilowatt hours 'of energy aiid 4.81 uillion gallons 'of water. Actual figures MOW for 1983-84 ihdicate unergy sales of auout 5A4 mililun Kilowatt nou s and water sales of 3.08 uilllon gallons. System growtn nas, therefore, peen over 14% for electric and aoout 14% fur water. These additiona.i sales have improved substantially. the financial position of the Denton Utilities. Une benefit of toe increase in water sales is a not gain of ,$171,000 for the water and wastewater services rather than a net loss of $574"00bu as projected whan{rates were inceEbasud usarlier this year, A second positive result is treat wastewater rates will not gt~nerally increase dlthougn some specific increases are necessary such as the rate for industrial water. A third benefit of the increase 3n customer use is. a :eduction in the cost per Kilowatt-hour of toe Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) fixed cost from what would have been auout ~.8 cents eased on 4% growth as compared to the prupused 3.5 cents per KWH uased on current proyectloi+5. sZuoU ^r A kladth the elootrio ano water rite reviews have relied heavily on the'oiloert Cost-af-service studies prepared wltiin 'the past year, -'The water rate changes 'resU.tt in 'an incteas4 of about 10,8X over current rates raising the average cost per 1,UU0 gallons from about $1,63 to about $1,80, The electric rate changes increase the average Cost per kilowatt nuur from about 7,U34 per KWH to about 8.144 per KWn for an average increase of Four cna'ivges are proposals for the electric t,at'es. 1) Removal of the 4,54/90 of fuel and purchased power from tne uase energy rates, 2) Place TAPA's $21,272,UUU not fixed costs in the base enemy rate, anion represoirts ~,id per KWH, (Exhibit V11i . Place all variable fuel and ~ppurchased power costs in the energy oust adjustment (ACA) charge. (rnis cost would include only the variable mining casts from TMPA) all fuel puronases and all power purchased Orougn economic dispatch). 4) Establish a summer and winter energy cost. adjustment refleccing actual Variable costs per KWH for each season which will result in a winter (Nov-April EUA of 2,756 per KWH and a summer (May -October) ECA of 2.754 per KWH (Exhibit IX), The need for a rate change for electric service arises not from a hued to generate additional funds, rather to re-allocate the rates to reflect uhanges in the fixed and variable structure of j system costs. rrie rate proposal will actually ruuuee the cost to toe ratepayer slightly over what would now be collected from present rates acid ESA pass tnroughs. (See Electric Prr, Forma, Exhibit 11). A summary of the proposed rates (Exhibit Iand the relative cost t' increase anticipates (Exn.tuit ill) snow the effect on the various customer classes, A review of the Water Pro Forma (Exhibit XII) demonstrates the need for audit:ionai revenues, fne current rates would leave the r ~ service about $49100ou short of meeting wkp'enditure requirements far the fiscal year, the adjusted rates will produce a net positive financial position showing aoout $65,000, The rate ohange consists primarily of about five (ti%) pero ant increase on the facility charge and an addition of $0.15 per 11,UUU gallons to the volume charge, The rate cnunge will account for about $560,U00 of iicreased sales revenues (Exhibit XIII), REVENUE REQUIREMENTS Planning Period The planning period used for this study is the historic data Prom Fiscal Year 1982.83 tnrougn the present and prujectioiis for fiscal year 1984-8y, The budgeted expenditures for fiscal year 1y64-85 Aett' used as tiie Uase" "Or revenue needed. Sales C2nsum~ 2ttion Energy consumption is projected dt about five (5%) percent increase for FY 1x84-85 over FY 1963-84, Tnis exceeds the ten year historic trend; however, evidence of continued growtn in Denton i indicates tnis is a reasonaule assumption, Water consumption is pto,jected to grow at about three and one-half (3,5%) percent, ELECTRIC WATER Sales (GWH) (Million Gals) i)82._d3 )06 21698 1983-84 584 3,o81 1984-85 6U7 31190 Usage by Uustomer Class Annual volume by rate class based on the past two years of montn.Ly reports: ELECTRIC WAXER Resiueiitial 34.6% 4/.9% commercial 59.9% 49.5% Governmental 467% Coriotn 2,4% Uther .8% .2% 10070-1 l00 : a Nu!O*r of Customer: Customer growth is measured oy the number of transactions posting within a rate class each Mbntn, Staff applied a growth rate of y% for annual electric bills and 'l.5% for annual water bills, I 1y83-84 I I 1984-65 I Customer Q14ss IElect.ic Mater I IElactric Water I Residential 236,872 152,414 251t99i 1.K71942 Uommercial 290929 25,05 301534 260387 Government* 10458 12 11517 1;: Other 4,163 ti0 4,335 540 TOTAL 2720422 178,434 2889377 18418al • dater is for resale Rate Program Uiscription The rate p.ograms are designed to allow for new rate impiamantation at airy time during toe fiscal year. It is anticipated that rate study will us ongoing and flew rates will normally coincide with budget years or be implemented so as to reflect cost for a full fiscal 'year: !~tner Income income from }iourees utner tnan commodity sales are considered constant assuming tinat changes in utner income are nut directly related to revenue generateu from commodity sales. Income figures in the 'pro 'formas yficlude additional interest from uuhd investments (sea geut Service below), New Expenses 80th Water and electric expenses used for this study reflect the 1964-85 Utility Department uudget. Changes from the 1983-84 budget are refiected in increased debt service and interest income due to the issuance of bonds. (See Exnibit Ii, electric Pro Forma and Exhibit XII, Water Pro Forma), 1.< f A Debt Service The rate study includes 8,n incrooae in debt service coats due to the aittioipated sale of $20,D001000 in revenue bonds. Horn proc')eds and associated costs will be allacated`to E14ctric Servtoe, $9,5 million, Water Service, 47,5 million and Sewer Survice, $310 milliun, Previous deat service is dIlGoated 0% to Electric and 35% to Water and Wastewater:. Tne Water Service also has a $1,nOO,000 uund from dariier in this fiscal year, Capital Expenditures :Lneluded in the Budget and in the Capital Improvement Plan kfive year planning document) are expenditures for capital projects to oe funded from operating revenues rather than debt, Return un rnvestment fraosfer Return on investment (RBI) are calculated at a rata of six (bpi) porcent of net plant in service less all contrlouted capital. The Staff assumed a 509 'split uetween water and wastewater for the HOI for tiie current study$ RATE DM ON-CLECTRXC The proposed electric rates were designed by reallo 'sting customer energy Charges, The base energy charge included in the current rates is 4.5 cents per kilowatt hour. The base energy has now been reduced to 3.$ cents per KWN (See Exhibit VIII) and all variable energy will be included in t1)e Energy Cost Adjustment (ECA). It is further proposed to develop the ECA semi-annually for the periods of November through Aoril and May through Oct,ohir (Exhibit IX). With all energy costs covered in the energy portion of the races, only local operating Costs, debt service, non-debt capital and return on investment transfers need tie covered by the margin above energy. Our previous cost-of-service study had allocated margins to oe 'covered by either demand or facility charges. There are 'no projected changes in the facility fdjA for electric sel'vice. Uemand is allocated in several ways) Demand may be allocated either as charges per kiluwatt as is done for busines3es, schools, chk~rcnes and others. Another allocation method is to divine customer class demand charges by tne,anticipated kilowatt hour sales for the customer class, thus making the demand a portion of the energy charges. A further alternative, used by the City of Denton, eomUines both motnods providing a demand charge and a portion of demand in the ailergy charge. it is proposed to continue this method thereby eflecting demand in two ways for customers. This method reflaets local and demand-related costs above energy for each customer class in addition to the energy charges related above. (Sae Proposed Electric Rates, Exhibit I). The ease demand ratei fur commercial eu5tomers will rise by i auout night (S%) percent with an adjustment to the energy onarge reelecting the additional' revenue to ue gained from increasing the demand rate. .(✓Jj 1 r' 4f 1t The rates retain too Al rate for residential oustomers who use small amounts of energy during the summer Months as a quest.-lifeline rate. These customers will receive a facility charge of $5,50 cper montii, as they prOtently receive and an energy cnarge of 4.4 cents per KWH, Tne Fly rate for all otner residential usera will retain the deetlning winter Mock and the inverted summer block, The rate for H customers will be $6.50 facility cnarge, 4.9 cents per KWH in the winter montos, declining to 4,4 cents per KWH for all energy usage over 1,000 KWH per month. The base summer energy charge will be 5,3 cents per KWH, a decrease in the summer/winter differential of O,ld per KWH, increasing tc 5.8b per KWH for all usage over 3,000 KWH per month, The Large Primary (LP) rate will retain the $49.501month facility cnarge, Tne demand charge is proposed at $5.20 per KW with an energy uhargo Of 3.5 cents per`KWH, General Service Prlmary (GP) customers dill retain the present $49.50 facility Charge. Tne energy charge is proposed at 3.7 cents pur KWH Aod uemand at $x.33 per Kw, Businesses in the General Service (GS) rate class will have the same $10.OU facility cnarge fur single pnase and $13.00 for three phase service, Tne demand rate will increase by about eight (84) percent cu $7.~)U per KW and toe e+iargy cnarye will be set at 3.9 cents per KWH. Local governmental units will retain their present facility Criavge5, receive a demand cnarge of $3.6U per KW and an energy rate of 3.9 cents per KWH. L;nurches and utoer centers of religious worship +4111 nave tne,,r same facility rates of $lO.OU for single poise ,ind $15.00 for three phase service. The demand cnarge will stay at $3.40 and the energy race will go cu 4.u cents per KWH. ~r M RATE UE$ION- OUR The proposed water rates were generally established by adding $U,15 per thousand gallons of water used to existing rates. In addition, the facility charges were 'increased by aodut five (5%) percent, The rate structure retains the summer inverted block for residential users who use more than 2U,000 gallons per month. Additionally, the gates ease the monthly facility charge on the meter size. The uase residential. (W1) facility charge will increase by $U,25 per month to $4.5U4 Toe volume charge will Increase to $1.45 Per 1,000 gallons except for summer usage in excess of 20,000 gallons wnion -will oe aoout 25% more or `$1.80 per I,QOU; gallons. The summerlwinter time frames are maintained as May through 'October, summer, and Novemoer through April, Winter. The same rates and conditions are applied to churches under rate class W1R (Religious Worsnip). The commercial and industrial water rate Increase (W2) is proposed to change the base facility rate from $9.00 to $9.50 per month, The volume rate will increase from $1.25 per 1,000 gallons to $1.40 for all usage. The rate charged to the City of Uorintn is proposed to increase somewnat less than other customers since tneir use is directly from the transmission sysrerr'. Corinth will retain its $150.00 per month facility cnarge, and toe volume rate will increase to $1.35 per 1,OUO gallons. During our designated summer months, the Corinth rate will continue to nave an inverted oloc:k for all usage over 3,0u0,000 gallons per month of $1.65 per 10000 gallons. r, 7-a'~Rfr3 ''-'-7r'Ri'S%{+°~'~- tyk' lL 1 b ti 3 RATE CHANGE$ftWASTEWATEA A few onanges are proposed in the rate schedules fur wastewater. Most are clerical in nature although they may have large impact if not made, The only rate cnange p4coposed is for Industrial. Water (S5). The current wastewater rates should provide sufficient revonue to cover service costs and witnin limits cost of service requirements. The 'rate schedule changes include reducing the Industrial Surcharge rate for users within the city limits due to an editing error in the previously adapted rates. Also the Industrial Swr'Charge will as added to all rate 'classes availaule to 'business and industrial customers. The rate for Industrial Water (S5) will increase from the present facility onarge of $92.00 per month to $97.00 and volume charges wili increase from $ .60 'per 1,000 gallons to $ .75 per 1,000 gallons. 4 "..,~'v-m--m'rte'---•mpaw•'.~r.v'1Ti+?v/f '!r~~nr :INHIBIT Z CITY OF DP.NTON PROPOSED ELECTAIC RATER 14-top-64 RATE CLASS FACILITY ENERGY DEMAND $/MONTH C/KMH $/KM/NO rrrrrrr rrr r....... REOIDENTIAL Al $5.50 4.40 R2 I PHASE $6,50 S PHASE $11,00 MINTER TO!'I000; KOH 4490 i0N~R 1000 4,40 TO 360 'KOH 5130 OVER 3000 5480 COMMERCIAL GENERAL 8ERVICE (COMMERCIAL) 68 1 PHASE $110,00 3490 $5450 3 PHASE $15600 3090 $5,50 GENERAL SERA;ICE PRIMARY GP $49,50 3470 $5.35 LARGE PRIMARY LP $49.50 3.50 $5,20 TEMPORARY POWER TEMP $10.00 6110 GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT 81 i PHASE $10600 3090 $3,80 3 PHASE t15.00 3190 $3.80 TRAFFIC LIOHTG 63 4,90 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING AF 1 PHASE $20,00 4100 $1,00 3 PHASE $30,00 4.00 $1.00 r E><~t:~Yr ii CITY' OF of"TON ELECTRIC NAM PROPOSED VS. EXISTims 14wE~p-64 PROPOSED EXISTING RATE CLASS FACILITY ENERGY DEMAND FACILITY ENERGY DEMAND $/MONTH C/KNH '1/KW/NO $/MONTH C/KNH V KN/MO wrw.Awrrwrrwwrwwrrwr.Ywwwr w o . w RESIDENTIAL $5450 5450 R1 $5.50 4*40 R2 $6,50 MINTER $6050 6400 TO 1600 KOH 4.90 3.50 OVER 1000 4,40 SUMMER $6.50 46650 TO`3000'KNH 0030 6150 OYER`3000 5.60 7.00 COMMERCIAL GENERAL SERVICE (COMMERCIAL) Be $10600 3490 $5650 $10400 5.10 f5, 10 GENERAL SERVICE PRIMARY Sp $44.50 3,70 $5.35 !49.50 4.90 f5~05 LARGE PRIMARY LP $49.50 3.50 $5.20 $49.50 4.00 $4.90 TEMPORARY POWER $10.00 7.20 TEMP $10.00 6.10 GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT G1 $10.00 3190 $3.80 (10.00 5.10 13.50 63 TRAFFIC LIGHTS 4.90 6.00 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING AF $20.00 4.00 $1.00 $20.00 5.10 $1.00 EMN!!1T It2 > w ELECT1116 Won PRO PON" i~ « iooor 14-i.p-!4 Currant PrOp04Ai h4teu Pat$* FY '83 FY 85 rrrrrr rwrrrr NET MNH TO SVITEM 6074331 607,331 0V C/KNH 6.26 8 18 REVENUES RESIDENTIAL 17,971 17,631 CONNEi1CIAL 281646 280293. BOYENNM 2,930 2,197 OTHER EL.SALES. 647 641 TMPA GOVERASE RET 5,534 50534 TMPA SURPLUS 59000 51000 NEST TEX UT4 CAP $30 430 OFF SYS SALES 41357 4,337 1NTER` IEARNEDI 14142 11142 OTHER 320 325 rrrr rw rrr rrrrr rrrr TOTAL REVS' 670062 661336 OUR. POLW S' FUEL C'jNYO/KMH 5.95 595 EXPENDITURES PERSONAL SERVICES 39013 31073 SUPPLIES 269 269 PURCHASE POW AND FUEL 51 015 51,015 MAINTENANCE 19701 11201 SERVICES 579 379 INS 6 SUNDAY 156 186 SALARY INCREASES 193 193 OTHER 110 110 BAD DEBT 250 250 0M TRANS 11266 1,268 rrr-Y- TOTAL EXPS 98 113 58,113 NET OPER REVS 51949 59223 CAP AND OTHER' WON OPER EXP BUD CAPITAL 19053 1,083 DEBT SERVICE 3,496 39496 RET ON INV TRANS 19667 1,667 -rrrrrr rrrrrrr TOT NON OPER EXP 6',246 6,246 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 64,359 64,359 assume museum NET GAIN (LOSS) 42,703 $19977 BEST SERV COVER 2.56 2.35 1 T"~..er 1 1 t>ti1~11t Iv -CITY OF GtNTOM RATE CHONYE KFF11CT9 9Y RATE CLAY! 14-Np-94 Rate FY 03.94 VY 04015 PsrcAnt Class CENTVkWH CENTS/MNH Chahgs Reridsotial Rl 7,16 9425 l5.2% R2 7.26 9,39 1546% Coomrr c141 Lid 6423 7424 1642% 8P 6,44 7636 1744% 0$ 7.43 0059 15 61; Tesp 9,31 14.40 1147% Religious Worship RM 0665 9.92 1345% Lotll Bovernsent 91 6.43 7,55 1764% Total 7.03 9,14 15.9% CITY N 1EMT111 EKN111t V E1 mic Y my AOI~ktiMIC! AT IMIIII* IATE1 StI1CAl 1KAN 105 10-N1~M up COO w on NO am w" all cm OILU OA70 "I1 02 mM WO Cmw cmw Cmw lo slim MM~ww Ni.r w .!M.« r.Y~ rrNMnw krMrr wwYwwr ,wMMwY Ywww~~ rYMMr, of I'll= 1 1 41 AN13#N 32171'2 1 12019 0 5,51 ISM coo so"" 0~1#n 11161 A? NlN1M 1X,01 0 "in? 204011 6.50 0:01 1,1110 O,0N f 1m 41M2 12 NMm 171975 / {l01711 121044 4451 446 1000 4,140 /.1275 111121 t01 AE1 2511M1 rY 0 1714130 32,61! !11,437 L11UN1'ER 44 114 49,154 0 41'50 5.20 060350 0,0350 041225 31472 MMNXR 41 145 13/013 0 14.51 5420 600% 1103 0 144275 4101 o i l 11T0R 91 31 221332 0 0.41 S,N 000311 s6sm 1,44M It141 um 1S 44 211111 0 40.50 6o" 101110 010310 0.1m 20111 1e MINTER 151013 321 121919 0 10100 5451 .0103" 0.0310 O,1t25 7t0N RINNNiR 15,IN 341 1"110 0 11.0 5131 0.0390 001310 0.4273 91221 rNYY. Y.Y NNwrr YYY NYr1 tot CON 30,534 14071 332,02 0 1211251 11 NINtEA 730 43 14,302 0 10001 3.0 1,0310 1.03" 0.1225 11113 SONG 751 41 17,470 0 1001 3.N 1.1001 ca" cam 11352 12 NINTER i 0 21033 0 0000 010 0:01 0.1000 0.0225 201 NANO i 0 21040 0 0, 01 0.01 00100 1.1111 loom 212 17 MINTER 12 0 375 0 1.00 0.10 1114" 1.1011 001225 27 SIN NO 12 0 401 0 MO 0601 010410 0.0410 040715 31 rYNNr .rrwr rrarw.. war, rIr d0i IIH 11517 91 34,IK 0 121"2 H NINTO 12 0 400 0 0110 060 O.NN 0.0001 0'0225 40 ININNEA 12 0 104 0 0100 0110 too* 0.0001 0.0275 45 Im 011ta 1,i05 0 404 0 will 0101 04fas 060410 0.1225 92 IAMM 1,510 0 152 0 16.0 1401 0.010 0.0110 0.0275 /l RN MINTER 543 13 11390 0 101y 0 $60 Corn CHO /.ow 137 SIOND 473 20 21413 0 ILL 3.0 1'" 0.1111 1.1275 231 7.700. rYN Nr.N., rrYN YYN 1NT ON 41375 33 61773 0 O641 .prrprtr ..Matt pprttttt pert MM~NM TOTAL 201377 1,115 $141551 32105 0"0421 .,,,~r1 it ,%FT,it, ,Ir city of 014TON KIN1611 V1 ELECTRIC UTILITY REVENIIE4'AT CURAENT AAT04 14-lop-84 FISCAL YEAA 1444-45 C110160E0 SALES $ALI$ SALE$ COST BN4 ?M4 RATE EN10 CM4i t ENO CMS, 2 [CA OAK *IV$ RATE CLAOG 4tLL$ AN MNII i MNM 2 $ PER MO S PER KM C P1A XIM C 0110 KIM G PER KMN 1 I ION w~N.M.!Iw.r w.M.r .,M..r rwrw. ..~rn~ww w. •wrrw.M. .......46. -.M.Y..... .....#.r.. ..rrlr~.• 41 "WIN 34,184 0 141453 0 6150 o.00 0,,0560 0,0450 040123 IIIn At SUMMER 32,712 0 12149 0 5050 0.00 0 0350 000550 060173 11064 R2 IiiNY1A 06,960 0 40007 20,047 6.50 0,00 0.0100 040660 0,6125 41462 02 /UNMER 97,915 0 110,701 12154,4 6.50 0.00 04650 040700 0.0115 1048v ! YYrMrw rr.lY .rr.w TOT All 251,991 0 11700130 32,611 4t7~97! LP NINTER 44 116 49,054 0 49.50 440 010110 0,0400 00125 30373 GUNNER 41 141 63,063 0 490,50 4600 040400 Or0400 060175 4,029 4P WINTER t7 311 22,332 0 M50 51OS 0.0490 0.049.0 04125 10071 BUMMER 95 64 26,006 0 49;50 S.OS 0,0490 0.0490 060175 26140 44 MINTER 15,003 327 02,919 0 10.00 5110 0.0510 0.0510 0.0129 7,444 GUNNER 151168 361 106,624 0 10.00 5.10 0.0510 O.OSio 0.0175 11297 TOT CON 30,534 11071 3520002 0 424,646 at MINTER 730 43 140502 0 10400 3,50 0.0310 0.0510 0.625 1,074 SUMMER 751 44 17,470 0 10.00 3650 010510 O.os10 0,0175 11372 62 HINTER 6 0 2,033 0 0.00 0.00 010000 0,0000 0.0125 204 BUMMER 6 0 21060 0 0.00 0,.00 0,4000 040000 0,0,15 212 43 MINTER 12 0 373 0 0.00 000 040600 040600 0.0125 27 BUMMER 12 0 466 0 0.00 0.00 0.0600 0.0600 010113 31 TOT GOY r..1$17 •--91 136,846 rlr. 0 $2,930 OD MINTER 12 0 600 0 0.00 0400 0.0000 0.0000 0.0123 40 .SUMMER 12 0 606 0 0.00 0100 060000 010000 00175 45 TEMp'NINTER 1,603 0 904 0 10.00 0.00 0.030 0:0120 000175 t2 SUMMER 11570 0 851 0 10.00 0.00 0.0720 0.0720 0.0175 92 RN MINTER 363 13 1,390 0 10.00 3140 0.0510 0,0510 0,0125 134 SUMMER 373 20 2,413 0 10.00 3.40 0.0510 0,0510 0.0173 239 TOT OTH 41335 33 60773 0 $N7 ereresrsw s.eree srewereser wars sae.aa.ws TOTAL 2049317 10145 514,551 32,611 $50,193 O~ C11Y M !1001111 Entity 1+11 E ftic tt11111y 1111111- At PLO iNI 161111 F1ft' " 1113-M C4111M I1lN IKEI MtH. Clll',0 0 mu ==I EIS as ! CA Ili a" ON OA t1" r Of w3 0111 NI 410,101 CIam CON0 CFNM01 111100 w rsr.r riMM rwwwN wrYMwr r~rYYYYrYr wrww!,MM wWrrN~1w .Nw.rrr► rrYiwM.N. oOrw It INTO 32,!27 1 13,121 _0 3410 0400 Cop 04"s 1,11# 0 At tl 211100 1 ttA 1 5,30 640 040" 1,011o 140031 NI r 121111110 111712 1 311111 190#0 4,50 0400 to" 041030 1,1131 4f$w @ 111111 all" 1 1001010 111"1 1431 0410 0,01!1 0,111 1.031 l,a! r. rr.. .wNYw .N.Y ~ww~M+. www 61 fit w 2311172 1 14,11/ 310105 011,121 1.1' 11111111 44 114 01391; 0 49,50 4610 0.11110 4,00 110031 3,114 um 47 112 6tji71 0 '41431 4,10 0400, 111111 1,1131 3,101 IF 111111110 Of 57 211112 0 41451 3005 1,1111 0,0410 0,0131 11411 111W ri 63 27o1/1 0 44,00 9,03 0,04" 0,1111 0.030 10734 N 1111111 141711 321 001431 0 10100 5410 0, 0510 0, 0310 0,0030 1,125 um 14,100 351 103,412 0 10.00 9.10 010.110 014110 0,0030 7,317 .NNwr rbMr rYY.ww wrrw M••r• TV CM 21,121 1,030 342,131 0 123,113 61111mu lot 41 14,212 0 10.00 3,00 110510 111511 04030 Ill !1111111 721 46 160171 0 loom 3030 611310 010510 0,1131 11014 12 KIM 1 0 loon 0 6 *00 0600 1,0010 11100 1,030 201 101001 6 4 loom 0 1100 0.00 00000 $100 001130 212 13 1111110 12 1 m 0 000 0401 olm" 1.1111 /,00m 24 Nm 12 0 4% 1 1. N 0400 1.0100 6,00 6110 26 rrrNwr wwYw wYMYr N~rN wr UN 1,131 p 350157 0 12,411 M 111110 12 0 101 0 000 0,00 001010 O,N44 0, 0071 0 111M 12 1 111 0 0,10 0,o0 0,40 110101 1,1130 45 TEII/ 113111111 11541 0 161 0 10401 0,00 6.0720 !.0720 0,0131 10 11111009 11307 0 111 0 11;00 0,00 0.0120 mtl0 001031 14 w wwd► a so 12 1JU4 19 4;~ 0 f1.N x.40 sow$ 1.410 0310 loom 120 0.Ig/ 14+1 rNrwr r~wYr r`wrYrw wr.N ww.. 711 m 41113 32 6,93t 0 4391 awa,maa *@am ovum mar saaasu TOTAL 272,421 low 5939273 30,15.'1 0/10111 777417 -7, ERNr~tT VZRI Y"PA FWD COSTS Assigned as Energy Cats 0 X 1000) 14-lop-S4 COMPUTATION OF SASE TMPA FIX10 ENEABY COST Rate per Kilowatt-hour TNPA ft;Xob COSTS $31,337 LESS COVERAIE RITURN 15,0141 LESS i493-14'OVERPAY (810001 rwrrrrr TOTAL RECOVERABLE $219277 DIVIDED SY MET TO SYSTEM (MMN) 607$31 CENTS PER KMM' 3,80 7'^-.,R*m.w~ r ^~;l.e. vv~e•Tr+rTYr^.mwr..`kip' ,e~...wcn,-'^,. +'-Tr 7 s l3 ak toll` IM CpNPUYATION OF Et4ENSV COST ADJU TWNT Sik Month Avoi'~gin8 ! 4~f~p•S4 tt} X 1090! WINTIR SUMMER TOTAL DENTON GENERATION $1,051` $29375 $3,627 GAS 444 20575 3,020 j OIL 607 0 607 CGMMANCHE PEAK 54 69 142 410OWS CREEK 31596 30559 70150 0EP LIGNITE 432 340 792 ECONOMIC Ot SPATCH 219 2' 41934 7,916 81lSTGTAL 11130 111520 19,662 LESS OFF SYS SALES k`1906 11431 4133? NET FUEL t FUR POW $5,228 $10,097 $15,325 i NET SALES (mWH) 246,061 361,250 607,331 NET CENTS/KITH 2.125 2.795 2.323 PROPOSED ECA j CENTS/kNH 2.250 2.750 2.547 { REVENUES DEVELOPED $59537 $9,934 $15,471 F 777 Ri1NIi~T x ~ IUCTRIC CWT C00"Ildid 14-8Rp•N Tvpkal sills R[t18tNtlAl IR~I 1000 kO" psr month present Proposes Nate Rate Increase 1904 Minter Facility 650 $4.30 Energy 0.0600 040490 [CA 010030 0.0223 Monthly bill $71,50 $78.00 16.30 Cents/kwh 7113 7180 9109% Summer Facility 46.50 $6;50 Energy 046680 000530 ECA 010030 0+0275 Monthly bill $76.30 $01400 $10030 Cents/koh 7.65 8.70 13.73% R€SiDEki1AL (R1) 300 kWH p*r month Present Proposed Rate Rate Increase 1964 1985 Winter Facility 43.30 $5630 Energy 000350 0e0440 ECA 0,00$0 0,0225 Monthly bill $23,50 $25.45 $1.95 cents/kWh 7183 8.48 6.30% Summer Facility $5.10 $5430 Energy 040330 0,0440 ECA 00050 0,0273 _i Monthly bill $23.30 $26.95 $3.45 Cents/kWh 7.03 8.98 14.66% ti'm z r .q rnr y - -.r.~.-r~. nvaaT~l'J.q^l^'T'~-"' 177r r a rc ,4-f rtiJ i irs<I~ritrT it 1 Ilectrlc cost csiopOisomtl, pals caaat~~rA~ i~fr 1000 kMN per monti, 6 kw demand Present Prgposad rarcent Rate Rate Increase 19114 17113 Winter Facility $10600 $10600 Energy 0.0510 010390 Demand $3010 $3050 ECA 010030 04225 Monthly sill $96,60 $104.50 07,90 Cents/kMh 9.66 30,45 '4010% summer Patt14tY $10400 to 000 Energy 010310 010540 Demand $5010 $5.30 [CA 0.0050 0,0273 Monthly sill $96460 $109050 $12190 Cents/kWh 9.66 10.93 13.33% M........................................ COMMERCIAL (GS) 75% Load Factor Customer 295,650 kMH per month 340 kw demand Present Proposed Percent Rate Rate Increase 1904 1983 Minter Facility $10400 $10.00 Energy 0.0310 010390 Demand $5410 $5430 ECA 0.0050 0,0225 Monthly bill $190520 $21,162 $101142 Csnts/kWh 6.53 7,16 9033% Bummer Facility $10000 $10000 Energy 0.0310 0.040 Demand $5.10 $5130 ECA 010050 0.0273 Monthly Bill $19,320 $22,641 $3,320 Cents/koh 6.33 7.66 17.19% '4 r+r+ # mrRrv+.' n'e'rys,i''nw x a.n n,`g"7!q~yi'°s:.~apru. ''A71i"°_1 ?wxa say s. J 1190011c trot twomirl"Ass '400 3 Cfg1lItIMCIAI 110) 20% ANA Fetter Net~ 14,640 kVN per month 104 kw des6Ad Ire "t preppsod Rate Rate Incroaee t914 i ts$ Mater Fq4 lily 110,00 ;10',00 Energy 0,010 010;!0 DzwaNd 15,10 x:.50 ECA 010050 040225 "Ghthly 1111 11,339 11,455 $120 Cente/kNh 9.16 9.99 B.9RX Summer hauilii;y 110400 110,00 Ener4Y 000100 04310 Demand *S140 15400 ECA 000050 0.0275 Monthly Sill 11,338 ti $31 1193 Cents/kwh 9116 10.49 14.40% .r...................rrr...................................,.. COMMENCIAL (66) 301 Load Factor Customer 21,900 ki1H per month 100 kW dseand Prevent Proposed Rate Rate Increase 1984 1985 hinter Facility $10,00 110.00 Energy 000510 060390 Demand 15.10 15050 ECA 0.0030 0,0225 Monthly 9111 119746 11,907 1160 ants/kwh 7,97 8.71 9.19% Summer Facility $10,00 110600 Enarpy 0.0510 010390 Dfman: 15.10 15.50 ECA 040050 010775 Monthly Bill $1,146 12,016 1270 Conte/kwh 7.97 9.21 15.46% Rr. clog d t1'Mttrtc coo! csMortsoss` 11 R 4 A GOMi1t111:1A1` (01} 90% Lead Factor tastolior 360500 WO per month 100 kN dowd Hiseat Proposed _Pat$ Rate 1ncrf4oe 1904 1915 Nintm facility 30,00 010,00 Energy 0,0510 0,0390 Demand $5410 $3450 [CA 040050 040223 Monthly $111 $2,564 $7,103 $241 Cents/kwh 7.02 7061 9,39% Summer Facility $10400 $10400 tneroy 040510 040310 DrRand $510 $5,50 1CA 040030 0,0775 Monthly 0111 $2464 $2,907 $423 Cants/kwh 7.02 $,11 16.51% rrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.~r.~rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrr PRIMARY 1LP1 50>< load Factor Customer 3651000 kWHper month 1000 kW demand Present Proposed Rate Rate Increase 1914 1913 Winter Facility $10.00 $10.00 Enoray 0.0400 010330 Demand $4.00 $3.20 ECA 010030 0.0223 Monthly /ill $240135 $26,190 $2,043 Cents/kwh 6.62 7.16 0.461 Summer Facility $10000 $10100 Enorgy 0,0480 0.0330 Demand $4,00 $3,20 £CA 010050 0.0273 Monthly Bill $24,133 $29,023 $3,169 Cents/kwh 6.62 7.60 16.01% 17-7 '7-P 77- s' r _ CILy Oi pink PRO►OSES 0010 RAN$ 20-Se~~11 RESIDENTIAL (W11 Customer Charge (sonthly) Volume Charge 11,40 per 1000 gallons 3/4" Motor *440 Over 20,000 gat $1,00 Poe 1000 gallons s 1" ',29 1-1/2« /2,23 2« 19.00 CON"ACIAk ANO Iaus,101AL (02) Custsat0r' 641094, (""thly) Volume Charge 11.40 per 1000 gallons 314" Oster sl* 1« 31.000' 1-1/2" 113.25 2« i10Y00 3 140.00 4" 176.00 b « 117.00 e« $ilo,oo SALES FOR RESALE (W31 Customer Charge (monthly) Volume Charge 11,33 per 1000 qallons !100,00 Over 390009000 gal 1r65 per 1000 gallons M 1NTRASOVERNNENTAL SALES OF RAW LAKE WATER (W6) Customer Charge (monthly) Volume Charge 10,90 per 1000 gallons $97.00 RELIGIOUS WORSHIP (WIA1 All charges as residential' (01) above. a► Applies '.o the months of May through September only ALL OUTSIDE OF CITY SALES 40'0 SERVICES WILL BE AT 150% Of THE APPLICABLE RATE Y~y1 yid ~ r~~~ 1T1 Th `p~.~•i4 ►R0101~! Vi ><llttlNl NATti RROpOftA #1t AOt.Esi 411101"not. (oil RATES Cuotomw charge 3/40 Meter _ ~4'~s0 $i~ 36 IN ii; ti 11~1s 2" 11,00 $4050 Values Charge 111,43 per 1000 401lons 11140 Over 20,000 oil 4140 per 1000 4611646 • 01060 COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL 1N21 Customer Charge "3/4" Meter l/ 'J0 $1,00 i~~sw: 410,;00 -12,4 0 0 2Y 41 L:QY l14 i'.i s $40 60 410 Iy6,0 $12000 111,00 $92'* 60 S• $110.40 $10500 Voluse Charge $1.40 per 1000 94110ns $1.25 SALES FOR RESALE IN31 Customer Charge $150.00 par month $150.00 Volume Charge $1.35 per 1000 gallon', 01.25 Over 3,000toto V'.1 1.65 per 100x, gallons • 1.53 tNTRA60VERNMENTAL SALES OF RAN LAKE WATER 1M6) Cuatoman Charge 601.00 per month $12.00 Volume Charge 10.10 per 1000 gallons $0.50 AELI8104 WORSHIP (MIA) All charges as residential a60vd 11111 • Applies to tl;e months of May through September only ' '."'ai°Pt ~S"'C _e.^~.^'rT', .::~}9F'wee!R"t^`-;7~ ,4~'"+T.~,'.7"°`' ~1,,"-~v*'¢7c"'~r."*!R~' n~ir-~(. rFr^vs~TaT!p~•'.,._ -.-„lF^,v,..^r...- '\Y LkNltaiT 1II1I MATER SSRVICt PROW" x 1000) rurrRne Pr*006*d 14-S~p~B4 R~lAlr Ri~l~S FY 'B» FY '15 Porcont OL' SAL SALES 30190 31190 Inereato COST /1000 GALS 11663 11410 10,77% r~++~ww rww-rrwwww r+r REVEV+;ES RESIDENTIAL 2161/ 3{112 COMMERCIAL 2049 2,436 (LE.Bt; L 1 1.07 115 ~1`,VAR NAMES k4 94 6000INY 2ft6 226 St7NDf,INT INC 123 623 TOTAL REVS 49046 6,606 E f(PNNQ 1 T41RES PNRSONNAL SERVICES 10.109 111.09 SUP►{.14iS 165 465 PRODUCTION POWER 613 613 MAINTENANCE 469 4119 PURCHASED WATER 793 783 SERVICES. 221 228 INSURANCE AND SUNDRY 28 20 SALARY INCREASES 73 73 APO N TRANSFERS 602 602 r--r-- TOTAL EXPS 4,069 41069 - NET OPER REVS 1,977 2,336 CAPIT AND OTHER NON LUD CAPITAL 623 623 DEBT SERVICE 11454 19434 RET ON IRV TRANB,- $95 395 TOT NONOPER 2,472 20472 rr-r-- _r+rr- TOT OPER t NON OPER EXP 69541 61541 romemr assess NET GAIN (LOSSI (1493) 165 DEPRECIATtON 247 247 DEBT SERVICE COY 4436 1174 IlNilil 'y iV ta1Y. ~ iMIM MA1M rTl111r . AIVIM~!`it Won M1p N[lliMllAl AISIMIA1 m iAl wo IAa on FOR IN1M MMEI,IAIMA1 It'#lEll /GI MM Ji N i limit SIMLE KM MM 11MIOD so 20ON0 IAL MA1EI1 am ...M...r..MM. M....M.M. ♦ M__ M......M~M~V1M~~ IILL1N1 IE1E1R11 AMRMII ilus 111JM1 IS71N2 2$1117 12 12 SM Mtn V AD 3l1N,311 1,0Nj11i MjW 113610043 SO^ 2711V 1313N 1,071 r w 11 t M7Ib piATMMIERR $1,25 a.N M"M N2,N n.N VIl11E t1,30 $1.60 11,25 $1,23 $1,33 $010 $1,23 t31AREM1 of" $3t117o321 12,010,111 $757,571 OJ111112 4407" $4201/0 117 15! tlts0ll now NAM pI1TM 1 $4,30 "036 OWN 417.0 41.30 M1 $1.13 CA $140 $1,33 $1013 0,10 $1.10 ►I M kit 1317571113 41112P,112 W21M $2106,113 $Nl121 t/1,W sulvt 1!1,01 1 1M K" gib m 1111;1 o7 „ii.w 61.311 p1.711 '~1.4% NI4im $i~N0o0z hl" we Ot11an I IM i~, 1~Y~'w tip. )p r1,j. 77 ` 1 1 [~M1IIT x~► a "YIN NATO COOMIONS vypical Bills Rrriori+rlR~ iw~~ 50000 6allpns per month Prodent Proposed Rate Rate` Increase 1904 1905 Facility $4.23 $4.50 Volume 140 1.45 Monthly bill =10675 $11.75 $1,00 9.30% rrrr►.............w.►......►r.r►►r►►rr►►.r................ 20,060'rallons per month Present Proposed Rate Rate Increase 7984 IM Facility $4,23 MOO Volume 1030 1.43 Monthly bill $30,25 $33.30 $3,25 10.74% 50,000 gallons per month-Minter Present Proposed lncrease Rate Hate 1964 1965 Facility $4,25 $4.50 Volume 1130 1,45 Monthly bill $69,25 $77.00 $7.75 11.19% .err.rrwr....r............ 50,000 gallons per sonth-Summor Present Proposed Rate Rate Incraaas 1964 i965 Facility $1425 $4,50 Volume, 1436 1.43 over 20,000; 1160 1,, r0 Monthly bill' 41.30 $1,45 $04is 11.54% 7 T' ?7 7 171,777 -71- t11Nl IT V -b 04tor coot coopatiseow, pat$ 2 COMlft11C1A1 iM21 20000 44116i For Month Prtio"t Proposed Increase Rate hate 044 1983 Facility 19.00 1t30 Volume 1025 io40 Monthly bill $11.30 $12.30 $0.00 6.96% rrrrrrwwrww rwyr.....wrrr.....rwr. r rrrrrrwrrrrwrrrr 5000 Gallons per month Present Preposrd` Increase Rate ,Rate 1904 l ieS Facility 19000 $140 Volume 1.73 1,40 Monthly bill 1!3.25 116.50 11.25 8.70% r.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrswr.rwrrr.rrrrrrrrrrrwrrr.rrrr......rrrrrrrr. 50000 gallons per ennth Present Proposed Increase Rate Rate 1904 1995 Facility 19.00 14.50 Volume 1.25 1.40 Monthly bill 171.30 179.50 $8.00 11.19% rrr wwrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-rrrr -r-rrrrrrrwr.._rrrrrrrrrrrrrr 200,000 Gallons per month Present Proposed Increaso Rit4 Rata 1914 1985 Facility $1,00 19650 Volume 1.25 i.40 Monthly bill $239.00 UM S0 $30.50 11.78% P F7 1984 ACTUAL AND PROPOSED t/KWH R•2 1000 KWH 10 9 8.7 g 7.7 8.1 7.8 t 7.1 7.50 PER KWH 6 5- 4 3 2 1 0 JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV MAY r f 11 Q PER KWH SERVICE RATE R-2 WINTER - 1000 KWH 10 5 8.80 8.50 a 8.08 7.80 7.82 7 6,32 4 6 PER $ KWH 4 3 2 1 0.._. DTN CRHT DENTON GARLAND DTH COOP TEXAS NM TEXASP&L EUCTAIC RAZE C/INAAIWr amto W KOH Cityi4tility KIN KWA KMN KITH KKN KMN 500 700 1000 1560 2000 5004` uruuw.r..nrrww ww r..... «r. w. r.rr.w...rru.......r.......r...............o............«.u. ~w hatolmrsot 1173 1.38 1.01 1.36 1623 7,03 *tea 1r210 1,45 1,01 7x10 7642 im I,u solmd 1.22 1.00 7;12 Us 62 f LU kotan Coel. M 1,45 1101 1,10 1.l/ 4f 1.31 le.Nw NOR. 9'" 1074 1.14 1.32 1.23 1.14 leas''1+l 6.15 6.54 6.32 6.14 8.06 3.17 TV` 177' f~ d PER KWH SERVICE RATE R-2 SUMMER 1000 KWH PER MONTH 10 4 8.70 8.93 8. 8.22 8.56 a 7.64 7 6 d PER 5 KWH 4- 3 2 1 0 OTN CANT DENTON GARLAND OTN COOP TEXAS NM TEXASP&L ELECIAIC RATE CWMIW coots W KIM Citymility KIN Km KIN KIN KIN Km 300 100 1040 Is" 2000 3000 ..w.... ..w.............. r........... w................ N......ru....r...uw..e«......rr...re DMten,cwrnt 1,23 1111 1431 1031 1.z6 Ills RM6M 1-2,1 9.35 1,11 1410 ION 141 1.27 1w 1412 too 1922 1,01 1.02 7.4 NAN Coop, i1s01 040 1$36 e.is 1" 7A Teas 1K 1.12 1.14 1,64 1.41 1,31 7.31 PV 1984 ACTUAL AND PROPOSED O KWN GS 1000 KWH 4 Ku 10 9.7 9.2 9 8.7 8,2 8.6 8 7 OKWH 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV MAY ! 1 ~ ~ { 1 l a R"+F'^~ "T T 3 1 vR_` S. T" c'm' ~ r ti A f PER KWH COMMERCIAL GS L.f, 20% • 1000 KWH PER MONTH 7 KW 16 14 12,99 12 11.02 11 21 10,71 0,60` 10.19 10 9.22 8 PER K41H 6 4 2- 0 DIN CRNT DIN SUMR DIN WNTR GARLAND DIN COOP TEXAS NM TEXASP&L ELECTRIC RATE MVMIW cuts per KIM kw 2 ko 3 kM 1 kM 14 kv 34 kw N cityiutlilty xwI KIN KW Km Ko am 250 Soo 1000 2000 soon 10000 wr~w.........r.......................r ...................M............0r.........l.....................ruu.u.rti arru u...u+w. OMton,w 13,71 l i, 71 10.72 10.11 9191 4.11 OMtM. i 14,21 12, 21 11 21 14,71 10,41 10.31 Wed 11 4r 4,wT 1,22 1,13 1031 11M C' 0Mt0n C*6 13,44 11.74 10,40 10,01 1,78 91u Tnis Wo ra. 11111 10,40 11,91 11107 11,04 15.41 Tnu1 NL 11.12 US 10,1! 1241 13047 JIM Ont"Jewrat 14.02 12.02 11.02 10,32 10,22 10.12 G 7Ir ft' 1 t PER KWH COMMERCIAL GS L.F. 60% • 140,000 KWH 274 KW 10 9 8.16 8 7.06 7.94 7.80 7.03 c t 6.50 6.62 PER b5 KWH 4 3 2 1 0 ON WNYR ON SLMR ON CRNT GARLAND ON COOP TXAS NM T P L ELECTRIC AATI CWMIBM- ants ►sr KIN ka M kr 137 ko 203 ko 274 km 4" Cityiotility KOH KOH Km K" KOH 23000 30000 75000 loooo0 23o000 .rs............u..................ri........ . ...................ii.............................. Wonjcwroat 1,97 7.93 7,94 7,94 7,93 paataoiviotsr 7.66 1161 7,64 7.64 7,63 larlaal 1.M 7,03 ' 741 MO 7.79 00otaft : Com, 4137 642 4.31 6.50 6,40 In" we IW. 1113 1,i6 7107 1103 4196 TINOS K 7'1°3 7.11 4171 6,62 6140 i ..,..-----'-•^ri.^^_'".'C'f"T".".,.- 777-^-T'_^.^ 7777777, L t PER 6M LARGE PRIMARY L.F. 50% 5009000 KWH PER MONTH 1370 KW IO 9- 8. 7.68 7.56 7,18 t 7 6.78 6.93 6.48 PER 6 5.34 KWH 5 4 3 z 1 0 OTN CRNT OTN SUMR DTN WNTR GARLAND DTN COOP TEXAS NM TEXASP&L ELECTRIC RATE CWMIW c"ts per Ko kw Ad kr 137 kN 174 k» MM kM 1370 kv 4140 City/Utility km KMN KW ON 0 KIM 25W 50000 100009 250000 500000 1000000 •Y~YNMwNwYYY.~NNNw NYY ~Y~~YN~~Y~N~YN Y~MY~~~YNY~ww~Y~YNNw~~~Y~iYYY~YM ~Y~w~ ~~MY~N •~~~YYYw YN.YwwY Nmto LMU 7, r 7,27 1167 7,19 7,15 7,11 kotpa LM301s 7.17 7,71 1.21 1,49 7o11 7,41 IVIOA 144 7.24 740 1,11 6,71 1,74 Iota c4! 6657 4,94 1150 1;41 Mi 6,41 Taal ON on, 1.`15 7,a 743 1611 1,93 1,92 Texas K 7117 7104 6,47 1,50 5,39 5.34 Oseta►,cr►tsst 7.74 733 7,59 7,56 7,51 7136 BREAK EVEN POINT; 404 KWD - .1t KWH $ PER MONTH AT 10sb00 WH 56 60 45 t 40 5 35 $ 30 t, 25 20 15 10 $'10 6- 0 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 55% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% z 27.40 `13.70 10.00 7.84 6.06 54.79 18.26 10.96 9.12 6.84 5.48 t f, -7 77- m~ 1 /1 ll 1 i 1 0 Ifs f PER THOUSAND RESIDENTIAL WATER W1•W 50000 GALLONS PER MONTH 4.0- 3,6. 3.0 2.19 2.5 2.35 2.08 2.0 1.93 PER 1.76 1.61 THOUSAND 1.5 1.32 GALLONS 1.0 0.5 0.0 DENTON LWSYILL DALLAS GARLAND BRYAN CRRLT'rl FRS BON later Rite Cuparison- Cosf re Thousand 4 Citykutllity GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS GALLONS SALLOW 2500 5000 10000 15000 20000 50000 . Won $3.00 12.13 $1.79 11.51 11651 $1.39 OMton,p $3.25 $2.35 C." $1,73 $1.68 $1.76 LoksVills 14.04 $2479 $217 $1,96 $1.03 $1,73 $1.22 a116s $2.04 41661 $1.34 $1.32 l1.29 Sarland ii.BG 11,32 11.14 $1,00 l1.03 $0.92 lryu $2.41 $06 f1,40 $1621 $1.12 10.94 Cbrrolton $2.36 $2,01 $1091 $1.19 $1.17 $1.13 Farw s Branch $2.36 $1.93 11.72 $1.61 $1.56 $1.37 l,> 7P11F P1 -r. r,; r S PER THOUSAND COMMERCIAL WATER W2--5w000 GALLONS PER MONTH 40 3.6 3,30 3.0, 2.79 s 245 PER 2.13 2.08 THOUSAND 2.0 1.93 GALLONS I.5 1.32 1.19 1,0 0,5 0.O DENTON LWSVILL DALLAS GARLAND BRYAN CRRLTH FRS BAN 1Ntor bt$ Coo0rlwo- Cost W TAou"w C1ty1Utlllty tiALL41M1 IKLONI KLm mum 1Kud ULU" 1Q00 5000 15000 23000 50000 13004 ..or..ru.......... «r. r...raw.-«...+ra.rrw...r..w..r.....,r r.uw.....w...r.r.......ro..... r r......... amtom $10,25 $2430 11.15 11,63 x1. 43 11.37 1ootM,$ , $104!0 $3.30 12003 01671 1f,S9 $1,52 6 IIf1,1v111* n~~S $2,`lf tE.l~ 1~/1,0" $1.67 ?1412 miloo 02 M 11019 10,90 $01" i0, 1t $0.05 1rtuw $4010 11.32 11,01 10.99 00012 AN kyNl $44" $2,13 11,33 11,29 $f,1t $1.07 Crroltoo ".00 12.01 $11M 11611 11.37 $1.57 frMrs ketch $5.15 $1.93 $1l/t CAQ 11.37 $L32 r-. ' 1 4. l e 1 ~ ,yY ♦ , l.~ - IF 11 T '7 1 E PER THOUSAND COMMERCIAL WATER W2 - 75000 GALLONS PER MONTH 40 M- 3.0" E PER 2.5 TH04SANp' 2.6 GALLONS 1.62 1.55 1.5 1.52 1,05 1.0 ; 1.00 .85 .84 0.5 0.0 DENTON LWSIIILL DALLAS GARLAND BRYAN CRRLTN FRS 9RN Nrty late teqarim- Cat W TkasW CitvWtilitr IAIAIgM MUD" MLLOIM WoNS 8AL1011! *IONS 1000 3004 13000 25000 so44o 7soo4 YYYYYYYY YMYNYYNWLNNNN.YNNNYNYY YY NYYYYMN.~Yy N......................... NY~YMNYYN YYY~NYYNYYN 4Mtbh f10,23 $2,30 4015 $1,61 11,43 1137 6MAtoAiF f10l10 13,30 $2:03 11.3 11159 f1.32 L fY111~ f9~3y 4119 11491 11,71 $1,67 ilia ~tl'1'a 'f2,N 41019 10.10 so," 14;11 ' 14,15 maw 14610 102 $1401 10.91 16,92 0414 kyM 4+43 $2413 C33 11,29 (fill $1.03 Gwrutim G.00 12,01 f1,N 41111 11.37 1i,33 Frarr'Irod all$ $1,93 fL6l fL10 11,37 11.32 F S-r-~.~t~[..a-irt.p rm -.'!FT^t.w.•^ q.'vrt'i`^ 'V 1^°` f91 .+a'ye4i ~wr...'iY. TS per. +t 1 ]ia iris 10 I NO A OROIIiANCE ESTAIsL HJNO HATES CHA GES FEES, DEPOSITS, OILLXNGS AND PAOCED~RES !OR NYMNO WATER AND EWER SERVICE$ 'BY THE CITY TO ITS CUSTdMERS; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,'TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION 10 That pursuant to Article III of Chapter 9$ of the Code of Ovdiuancea,,the rates, charges$ foe$$ deposits and procedures for pprovidia''S water and aewar 4orvice by the City to i,t• customers are heraby established as follows: WATER-Stm SERVICE; TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. ARTICLE I. GENERAL SERVICES-CHAiGLS AND PROCEDURES A. Account Connection Fee 3 B. Account Reconnection Fee 3 C.` Customer Requested Meter Readings 4 D. Meter T+gt Fee 4 E. Misdellanaous'Servicea 56 t1. Service Deposits G. Special Facilities Rider 6 ARTICLE; II. WATER RATE SCHEDULES A. Schedule Wl- Residential Water Service 7 B. Schedule WlN- Residential Water Service Not Connected to Sewer 9 C. Schedule W1R~- Religious Worship Water Rate 11 D. Schedule W2- Coad44cW/Industrial Watii Sarvice Rate 13 E. Schedule W2A Commercial./Industrial Water Service Motor 15 11: 1 F. Schedule W2N Commercial/Industrial Water Service Not, Cannected ` to Seater '16 PAGE 1 - WATER R SZM RATE ORDINANCE Q. Schedule W3 Water sale for Resale to Governmental Agencies Divisions or Subd visions 18 H. Schedule W4 Intra-Governmental Sales of Finished Water 20 Schedule W5 Reserved 22 Y. Schedule W6 Intra-Governmental Sales of Untreated Water 23 J. Schedule W7 Standbyy Fire Service Water Line 24 K. Schedule W8 Extra Jurisdictional Residential Water Cuatpmers 25 L. Schedule W9 Extra Jurisdictional Covwoor. cial & Industrial Water 27 Service M. Schedule W10 Metered Water from fire Hydrant 29 ARTICLE III. SEWER RATE SCHEDULES A. Schedule Sl Residential Sewer Set"Vice 30 B. Schedule S1R Religious Worship Sewer Service 32 C. Schedule S2 Commercial 6 Industrial Sewer Service 34 D. Schedule S2A Commercial & Industrial Sewer Service 36 E. Schedule S3 Wholesale Sewer Treatment Service for a Governmental Agency, Division or`Sub- Division 38 F. Schedule S4 Intragovernmental Sewer 40 Service G. Schedule S5 Sale of Treated Sewer Effluent: to Municipal utility-Customer 0 42 H. Sched+Ale 56 Metered Sewer 43 P/1aR 2 WAT .it ` 8 ,1ER "TE; ORDINANCE Y. Schedule 87 Residential Sewer Service to Users Outside City of Denton corporate Limits 45 is Schedule S8 Comm/industrial Sewer Service to Veers Without City of Denton Water Service 47 K. Schedule S9 Commercial/Industrial Sewer Service Outside City of Denton Corporate Limits 48 L. :schedule S10 Metered Sewer Outside City 50 Limits ARTICLE I. GENERAL SERVICES-CHARGES & PROCEDURES A. Account Connection Fee APPLICATION Applicable when a customer requests water or sewer service on a first time basis where no permanent service previously existed and where a new account. and number is established, without also receiving electric service. RATE Regular time $20.00 charge Overtime $30.00 charge B. Account Reconnection Fee APPLICATIONI Applicable when a customer requests service at an address which has existing or previous service, with an existing accounC''number and history, without also receiving electric service. j PACE 3,- WAFER it SEWER RATE ORDINANCE 11 RATE Regular time $10.'00 charge Overtime $15.00 charge Co Customer Requested Meter Readings APPLICATION When a customer requests a reading of City meter due to a contested billing more than twice during the succeeding eloven (11) months and no error is found. RATE Per Additional heading $20.00 SILLINO Charges will be added to the customer's next regular bill and will be due upon customer's receipt of bill and will be delinquent 15 days after billing date. D. Meter Test Fee APPLICATION Applicable when a customer requests the testing of a City meter previously tested within the past four years and the meter is found to be within the accuracy standards. PACE 4 - WATER 6 SEWER RA'I'L ORDINANCE 77- 1,1 RATE Per Test up to 2" $25.00 Charge Over 2" Actual Coat METER ACCURACY In the event a motor is found to be in error by more than plus or minus two percent 2%) on the high flow teat, no char a will be made for meter 'East and the customer will be credited or billed up to 24 months of past history in accordance with the error found. E. Miscellaneous Services APPLICATION Applicable to all miscellaneous services to customers not included in other sections. BILLING Labor (Regular Time) Actual time vorked measured to the nearest one-quarter hour ar,u billed at the rate applicable to the employee's salary plus `payroll additive of 35%. Labor (Overtl.me) Actual time 'worked measured to the nAPrest one-quarter hour and billed at one and one-half (145) times the regular time rate applicable to the employee's salary plus payroll additive of 35%, Transportation All vehicles to be billed actual miles driven at distribution rate (cost to operate) applicable to vehicle type used All Material Stores cost plus 25% and applicable sales tax. Other Costs The actual cost for meals and other miscellaneous out-of-pocket expenditures applicable to the ,job. ti TE p~Ii E CP, R'Ll PACE 5 A Ai 7r 7-r- F. Service Depot. 3t!. APPLICATOIL Applicable when a customer requests, water or sewer service for the first time in the Denton wator/sawer service area and does not have City of nanton rlactric service, RATE it eaidantiel Custaraer; A' customer will make a deposit of $100.00 or an amount equal t0 1/6 of the last twelve (12) months billinga at the meter location, whichever is leas. The'minimum deposit for residential water/saver service will be $50.00 2. ComAerci,al/Industrial Service; A commoraial, industrial or other non-residential customer will make a deopnorsYist kf the months amount equal to 1/6 of the last twelve (12) meter location, but in no case will be deposit be leas than $75.00. WAIVER OF DEPOSIT Deposit is not required if the customer has a good credit standing for utility service with the City of Denton or cation other utility system for the twelve (12) months prior to app for service with the City of Denton. Deposit will not be required in the event a customer has a co-signer who meets the above criteria, REFUND OF DEPOSIT Deposit will be held until customer has completed twelve (12) continuous months with a good credit standingwith the City of Denton Utility. At such time, or upon closing the account, a refund of entire deposit plus any accrued interest will be made. G. Special Facilities Rider SPECIAL FACILITIES RIDER 14 Applicability: If All service shall be offered from available facilities. a customer aeriplae characteristic requires facilities aand nd devices which are not normally supplied by the readily,. available at the location at which the customer requests service, then the City shall provide subject to paragraph 2 of this schedule. 2. The total cost of all facilities required to meet the customer s usage characteristics which ate incurred by the City shall be 'paid by the customer" and subject 'to a special contract entered into between the CityatiAnd mes the tusto mere This contract `,;shall be signed by both p prior City providing service to the customer. PAGE 6 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE .u. s. .,..ate -71 4 t- ARTICLLO II. WATER RATE SCHF=ES A. RESIDENT WATER SERVICE (SCHEDULE APPLICATION Applicable for single family residential service, and individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi- family facilities with less then 4 units. 1gq aPk1i 4ble to resale service in any event, nor to temporary; st nom` or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE WINTER SUMMER Billingg months of Billing months of Nov. through April May through O%t. 1) Facility Charge 3(4" Meter 4.50/Month 4.50/Month 1' Mater 5025 5,25 1-1/2" Meter S.25 8025 I.' 21, Meter 19,00 19000 to o 2) Volume Charge $1.45/1000 gals# lo45/1000 Up© 10,000 gals/mo over 10,000 gals/mo. MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. i` PAGE 7'- WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE PRORATION OF UTILITY SILLS a) billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula; Actual d"o 1 reading period x customer charge days b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the million gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula Actual day* .0 reading period x GAL in retie block x RATE per 0 1,000 gallons in rate block i` I I' PAGE 8 WATER FA SEWER RATE ORDINANCE 77 e. kLS111ENTIAL WATER SERVICE NOT rOMMUTED To MY (SCHEDULE WIN) APPLICATxON Applicable for single family residential service, and individually motored apattoonts or mobile haws or multi«foily facilities with less than 4 units, where the motored water is not returned to the wastewater system for collection and treatment; i.e., lawn sprinkler or septic system. t a liceble to resale service in any event, nor to tempos y, scan y, or supplementary service except, in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE WINTER SUMMER Oil.lin months of Billing months of Nov. through April May through Oct. 1) Facility Charge 3,411, Meter 4.50/Month 4.50/Month 1Meter 5450 5150 1-1/2" Meter 8.25 8.25 2. Meter 19,00 19.00 2) Volume Charge $1.45/1000 gals. 11.45/1000 up to 0,000 gals/mo. $$1.80/1000 over 20,000 gals/mo. MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 4 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORD'.NANCE , - PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually, Formula: Actual days in reading eriod x customer charge ays b) Billing for the water used shAll be based on 30 days per month to determine the millfon gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula Actual days in, reddin~g period x CAL in rate block x RATE per 1,000 gallons in rate block ~r 1. pA6E i0 - WAS k SCR RATE ORD F C. RELIGIOUS WORSHIP WATER RATE (Schedule W1R) APPLICATION Applicable ito all facilities used primarily for religious worship, served by a single water service line through one meter. Not Applicable for resole service in any event, ;nor to temporary, s and y, or supplementary serO.oe except iu conjunction with applicable ric't)r. NET MONTHLY RATE WI._ NTFR SUMMER billing months of Billing months of Nov. through April May through Oct. 1) Facility Charge 34++ Meter 4450/Month 4.50/Month 1' Meter 5450/Month 5.50/Month 1-1/2+1 Meter 862.5/Month 8.25/Month 2" Meter 19,00/Month 9.00/Month 2) Volume Charge $1.45/1000 gals. 11.45/1000 up to 0,000 gals/mo. $1.80/1000 over 200000 gals/mo. MINIMUM BILLING Same as facility Same as facility charge charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rAndered, end become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special, facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 11 -WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE - _.1 TI, PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual da a in reading period x customer charge ays b) Billing for the water uicd shall bu based on 30 days per month to determine the million gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula Actual days in reading period x GA4 in rate block x RATE per 10000 gallons in rate block PAGE 12 WATER 6& SEWER RATE OkDIMNCii .17 D. COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE RATE ,SCHEDULE W2) APPLICATION ApplWable to all commercial and industrial users, or other water users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. For all water provided at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Na ap~lioable to resale service in any evento nor to temporary, a and6y, or supplementary service '*xce t in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge 314", Meter 9,50 per month 1' Meter 10,50 per month 1«1/2" Meter 13.25 per month 21' ;Meter 15.00 per month 311 Meter 45.00.per month 4" Meter 7600'per month ' t!, r 97:00 per month 6,1 Me Meter 1110.00 per month 2) Volume Charge $1,40 per 1000 gallons MIN0111UM BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT within are calandar days from date of cissuance due if 'not paidBills SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to most customer's service requirements shall be Y?rovided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility oho .c shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual dA s:in readin ttiod x customer charge ays PACE 13 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE b) Dulling for the water used shall be based on 30 'days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula Actual days n reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per 1,000`gall6ns in rate block PAGE 14 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE 777- I-J7 1-7: 1:. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVICE METER (SCHEDULE WZA,) APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial and industrial users, or other water users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. For all water provided at one point of.'delivery and measured through one meter to be used in determining wastewater return only. Not licable to resalo service in any event, nor to temporary, Standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MON'xtlLY RATE 1) Facility Charge 314" Meter 9.50 per month l' Meter 10:50" per mouth j 1-1/2" Meter 13625 per month 2" Meter 15.00 per month 3'' Deter 45..00 per month k" Mater 76.00 per month 6" Meter 97.00 per month 8" Meter 11110400 per month MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 cal..:ndar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual da s in reading period x customer charge ays PAGE 15 - WATER Sc SEWER RATE ORDINANCE r'. M c " I WJDZ zM SIRVIca (SCHEDULE W2N) APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial and industrial users, or other water users not otherwise classified under this ordinance, For all water provided at one point of delivery and measured through one meter where the metered water is not returned to the wastewater sy~ptem for collection and treatment; i.e., water used in pxoduotion or irrigation or where wastewater flow is measured separately. Not applicable to resale service in a►uy event, nor to temporary, s an y, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge 34" Meter 9,#-50 per month 1' Meter 1040 per month 1&1/21"Meter x3.25 per month 2" Meter 15.00 per month 3" Meter 46,'00 per month 4" Meter 76.00per month 6" Meter 9700 per month 8" Meter 1110:00 per month 2) Volume Charge $1.40 per 1000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be `provided subject to the special facilities rider PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. PAGE 16 - WATER i SEWER RATE ORDINANCE Formula: Actual da s in reading period x customer charge ays b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per mouth to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per 1$000 gallons in rate block PAGE 17 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE G. WATER SALE FOR RESALE TO GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES SCHEDULE W3) APPLICATION Applicable to all governmental agencies, d'visions, subdivisions for distribution and resale of water supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Not applicable for temporary, standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE WINTER SUMMER billing sonths of Billitiig months of Nov. through April May through Oct. 1) Facility Charge $150.00 $150.00 2) Volume Charge $1.35/1000 gals. $1.35/1000 gals. up to 3,0000000 gala./month over5/1003 008000 per month MINIMUM BILLING $150.00 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requiremonts shall be providRd subject to the special facilities rider. WAIVER OF SUMMER BLOCK Any contracting authority under this schedule may have the upper summer block waived ~y 'installation of `water storage capacity, sufficient to provide for its finished water needs during times of maximum demand on the City of Denton water system and not taking water during such periods. PACE 19 - WATER ` SEWER RATE ORDINANCE f-'"-.-n ....n- +~...~r P,7?r._ 77 .~n•.a•r.n e•se...'.,~y... 777777777 PRORATION Or UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in readin period x customer charge b) Billing for the water used shall be bases' on 30 days per month to determine the million gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula : Actual des, n: reading period x Ga in rate block x RATE per JU 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 19 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE H. INTAA-GOVLRNMICNTAL SALES OF FINISHED WATER (SCHEDULE WO APPLICATION Applicable 'to sales of.finished water to all City of Denton Departments and accounts supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one motor. Not a libable to resale service in any event, nor to temporary, s an y, _ or supplosontary service except in conjunction w:,th applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge 344n Meter 9.50 per mot~th 1' Motor 10.50 per mcnth W/2" Meter 13 25 por month 2" Motor 15:00' per month 3" Mater 43:00 per month 4" Motor 7*00'per month 6" Meter 97.80 pei month 8" Meter 1110 .000 per month 2) Volume Charge $1.40 per 1000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which requite special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall, be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge ays PAGE 20 • WATER i SEWER RATE ORDIFLUs;CE -7-77, -171 1 'T --7777-77 b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 44,ts per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formulas Actual days in reading period x GAY. in rate block x RATE per 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 21 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE q r ..f P ..5, •1 q'".-~r~p••1.4 ~.pa 1 _r.... ..~_...~_~.iq ~.'s^^'~l{a...~'~r"'^'^fwrlT . (SCHEDULE WS) This space intentionally left blare' PAGE 22 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE qi I I. INTBA-QOVlCRNHEIa'xAL SAL&$ OF uNxiIMM WATER (SCHEDULE W6) APPLICATION Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and accounts for untreated water supplied at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Not a licable for resale exxcoRt in conjunction with applici e rider. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge $97.00 per month 2) Volume Charge $ .90 per 1000 gals. MINIMUM BILLING $97.00 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility 'charge 'Rhall be based on 12 billings annaally. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge ays b) Billing for the water used shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallDn consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual da s in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 23 - WATER ` SEWER RATE ORDINANCE .jC7 ~~TT J. $IANDSY FIRE SERVICE VATER LINK (SCHEDULE W7) APPLICATION 4plicable to commercial and industrial users for unmetercd fire service water line to serve only sprinklers or other private fire fighting equipment, Not applicable for resale in any event. NET MONTHLY RATE Facility Charge 6" Line 12.00 8" Line 118100 MINIMUM' BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from 'date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITZFS All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements nhall be providev subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY ',RILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge JU days PAGE 24 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE F"5'f c• r- r=.: 7,1 ` K. EXTRA JURISDICTIOI.AL RESIDENTIAL WATER CUSTOMERS (SCHEDULE We APPLICATION Applicable for single family residential service and individually' meteret' apartments or imobile homes or multi- AtAily f4c ilittox with less than 4 units outside the ccor2orate limits of the 01ty of Denton. NET MON'T'HLY RATS', WINTER SUMMER Billing months of Billing months of Nov. through April May through Oct. 1) Facility Charge 3411 peter 6.75 6.7$ 1' I~♦ter 7.85 7085 1- Mvi Meter 12.25 12.25 21, Meter 113630 (13.50 2) Volume Charge $2.10/1000 gals. $2410/1000 gals up to 200000 gals. $2070/1000 gals. over 20,000 gals. MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which 'require special facilities in order to most customer's service requirements shell be provided subject to the special facilities rider.' PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall hP based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge ays PAG,"s 25 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE. ~e 7 7, 1F b) ailUng for the ;water used shall be based on 30 do w per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 26 - WATER 4 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE 5 X115 i 1 I.. EXTRA JURISDICTIONAL COMMERCIAL 4 INDUSTRIAL WATER SERVLCL (SCHEDULE W9) I` APPLICATION Applicable for all commercial and industrial users or other users not otherwise classified under this ordinance outside of the corporate limits of the City of Denton for all water service 'provided at one point of delivery and measured through one meter. Not applicable to temporary, standby or supplementary service, except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY HATE 1) Facility Charge 14411 3~4"_Meter 14.25 per month ' Meter 15,75 per month 1-1/2" Meter 19.75 per month 2" Meter 22.50 per month 3" Meter 67.50 per month 4" Meter 114,`00 per month 6" Meter 145.00 per month 8" Meter 1165.00 per month 2) Volume Charge $2.10 per 1000 gallons MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of'issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. PAGE 27 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE r Formula is Actual days in reading ariod x customer charge ays b) Billing for the water used'shall be based on 30 'days per month to determine the gallon consumption to be charged to each rate block. Formula; Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per 1,000 gallons in rate block i' PAGE 28 - WATER F& SEWER RATE ORDINANCE 7t:'SwT^'. ^rp?^^.^-.r.:^r~"^'FR^T.'P'77 '^"t':j"'^1'^'. 77777-71 tic 1 M. METERED WATER FROM FIRE HYDRANT (SCHEDULE W10) APPLICATION As forall water taken through a fire hydrant or other direct distribution line source at one location for private or commercial use not associated with fire fighting. DEPOSIT $500.00 User shall place a deposit for geach use of each of the City's hydrant meter(s). no* ad. Dhpo~f-to be returned when meter is returned and final bill is paids NET RATE Volume Charge: $1.40/1,000 gallons Volume use shall be computed by subtracting the meter reading at time of customer paying deposit and receiving meter, from meter reading upon return of meter times any applicable multiplier. FACILITY CHARGE $15.00 %~~no . YNSTALLATION CHARGE $35.00/meter/installation PAYMENT Hills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 29 - WATER 6 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE ty j } ARTICLE 1119 SEWER RATE SCHMZS l A. RESIDENTIAL SEWER SERVICE (SCHEDULE S1) APPLICATION Applicable for single family residential service and individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less than 4 units. Not applicable for sub-billing or other 'utility billing by service user in any event. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge $3.00 per month 2)"Volume Charge $1.50` per 1,000 grlllon influent Billing shall be based on ninety-eight (98x) percent of water consumption but shall not exceed a 'maximum of twenty-five thousand (25,000) gallons. Monthly billings for the period March through November shall be based on the aversgm monthly rate of water consumption during the immediately prior months of December through February. Billings' for the months of December through February shall be based on actual consumption. New residential customers who do not have a full prior hon-irrigational history (December _.through February) will have a maximum bill bused on ninety-eight (98%) percent of water consumption or ten thousand 110,000) gallons of water consumption, whichever is less until a non-irrigational water consumption history is established. MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge $3.00 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be prv;oided subject to the special facilities rider. PERORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. PAGE 30 - WATER 4 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE j~' I . 711: Formula: Actual days i reading period x customer charge days b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block, formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in mate block x RATE per 30 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 31 - WATER it SEWER RATE ORDINANCE h k B. RELIGIOUS WORSHIP SEWER SERVICE SCHEDULE SIR) APPLICATION Applicable to all facilities used primarily for religious worship and/or education and not for residence or commercial or industrial enterprise. Not applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by. service user in any event. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge ,$3.00 per month 2) Volume Charge $1.50 per 1,000 gallon `influent Billing shall be based on `ninety-eight (98x) percent of water consumption but shall not exceed a maximum of twenty-five thousand (25;000), gallons. Monthly billings for the period Marsh through November shall be based on the average monthly rate of, water consumption during the immediately prior months of Dec®m4jr through February Billings for the months of Lecember ehro4sgh February shell be based on actual consumption. New res dkint'al customers who do not have a full prior non- irrigational history (December through February) will have a maximum, bill based on ninety-eight (98X) percent of water consumption or ten thougend (100000) gallons of water consumption, whichever is less until a non-irrigational water consumption history is established. MINIMUM BILLING $3.00 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered,. and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to most customer's service requirements shall be provid4d subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. PAGE 32 - WATER 6 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE t i Fattirula 1 Actual da s In readin period x customer charge ay. ' b) Billing for the sever effluent shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block. Eormulat Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per. 1,000 gallons in rate block A PAGE 33 WATER 4 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE r { C4 COMMIBCah MD INLUSTRIAL (SCHEDULE S2) APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial and indu:trial sewer service users and to all sewer service users not otherwise classified under this ordinance. Now.t..applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service us- er in any event. NET MONMY RATE 1) Facility Charge $6.50 per month 2) Volume Charge $1.60 per/1000 gallons billing based on eighty (80X) percent of monthly water consumption INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition, to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: CuwVu ([gu-260a B + (Su-260) 91) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume for user X. Bu is the tested' BOB level for user X or 260 mg/1, whichever is greater. B BOD per -1,000 gallons ($0.000590) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 260 mg/1, whichever is greater. S ($0`.000596) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING $6.50 per month PAYMENT Sills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 34 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE i. , r r, S P 1E~A~ I L x T_»___»I L~ S. All services which ro4u re spacial faoilities in order to' meet customer's service requirements shall be provided amb,ject to the special facilities rider. PRQRATI0N_ OF UTILITY BILLS a),Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actus,l days in reading period x customer charge JU days b) Billing for the sewer effluent, shall be based on 30 days per mouth to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per 13U 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 35 WATER 6 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE r r c r .~"i ,t,. 7TT • 1 D. COMMERCIAL 4 INDUSTRIAL SEWER SERVICES SCHEDULE S2A APPLICATION Applicable to all oommistoLal and industrial sewer service users and to all sewer service users not otherwise classified under this ordinance whose waste is measured by a meter dedicated to water which is returned into the wastewater collection and treatment system. Not applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service user in any event. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge $6.50 per month 2) Volume Charge $1.60 per/1000 gallons Billing' based on ninety-eight (98X) percent of monthly water consumption. INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu*Vu ([gu-2607 B + [Su-2601 Sj) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 260 mg/l, whichever is greater. B BOD per 1,000 gallons ($0.000590) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 260 mg/1, whichever is greater. S ($0.000596) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING $6.50 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 36 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE i SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to .meat customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities riders PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. formula: Actual d& Xs in reading period x customor charge days b) Billing for the sower effluent shall be bared on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in readin eriod x GAL in rate block x RATE per 1,000 gallons m rate block PAGE 37 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE: -n " -"'^ilP'_ ^•"i, 1' 1f :+i c, il°sr'~^, i.: ;^r_'+mf.-..... .~n .tea. .ti7A i E. WHOLESALE Jet TVA-TWIT SERVICE FOR GOVERNMENTAL (SCHEDULE S3) APPLICATION Applicable to any municipal corporation, or other governmental agency or subdivision which operates a sewer collection system. and contracts with the City of Denton for sewer treatment service. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility,Charge $125.00 pen month 2) Volume Charge $1.55 per 1,000 gala of effluent Billing shall be based on one-hundred (100x) percent "of actual gallons measured by meter at one point. MINIMUM BILLING $125.00 per month INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu■Vu ([Bu-2601 B + (Su-2601 SI) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X.. Vu is the billing volume for user X. Bu is the tested ROD level for user X or 260 mg/10 whichever is 'greater. B BOO pet 1,000 gallons ($0.000590) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit. Su is h, 540sted SS level for user X or 260 mg/l, wh4o~ ai is greater. S ($0x000596) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not, paid within lS calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 38 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE ~ n p SPZCIAL FACILITIES All s*rvicea which require special facilities is order to meet customer, 'a service requir*s►enta shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge ays b) ;Silli'A$ for the sewer effluent shall; be based on 30 'days per a6hth, to determine the ,ailon effluent to be charged to each rate block Formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block ,x IRATE per 10000 gallons in rate block PAGE 39 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE ngw ++y~ir _°"rtnv'°SrFfi a^7 t-'"-''°^~T' '".'i^ r S rl "3 f^ r .i~-.n. 'T 7 F. INTRAGOVERNMENTAL BEM SERVICE (SCHEDULE S4) APPLICATION Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and agencies for all sewer service. NET MONTHLY LUTE 1) Facility Charge $6.50 per month 2) Volume Charge $1:60 per month Billing shall be based on eighty (80x) percent of water consumption. INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and itadustrtal, there will be added to the not monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following 'formula: CunVu (jgu•2601 B + [Su-2601 S]) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 260 mg/1, whichever is greater. B BOD per 1,000 gallons ($0.000590) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 260 mg/1, whichever is greater. S ($0.000596) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING $6.50 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15'calendar days from date of issuance. PAGE 40 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE r y _-.Rre}.wrym~s r-,*r...; rF~Oj'- .4',C'++i-r^r^,+sr°'Tr'1. ..,,,rr•._.iyv,yn.y^'^'P?e't ^n .S1.-T„k n '-R,':lf'~' -r,-(^^`'rv-T'^,.,¢- -6'+.'.; m%!t^a- .*..•mrs ~'q-R`, SPECIAL FACILITIES All services whioh require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements ihallbq provided 'subject to the `special facilities rider. P1tOi(ATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading eriod x customer charge b) Billing for the sewer offluegt shall be based on 30 days per m6oth to aloterrine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x RATE per 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 41 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE *+r+rnrtr + ;a •S, o nm rv ^ a'sr wc.r Ta.rt 7777717, 7 SALE OF TRE/1TLO SEi R trnUaff (SCHgDULE SS) APPLICATION Ap licable on sates of treated sewer effluent to any municipal utility, Not available for resale in any event. NET MONMY RATE 1) Facility Charge $97.00 per month 2) Volusm Charge $ 975 per 1000 `gallons MINIMUM BILLING $97.00 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days frog date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITAS All services which require special facilities in order to most customer's service requireuents shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge JU days b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in rate block x'RATE per 10000 gallons in rate block PAGE 42 - WATER 16 SEWER Rr!TE ORDINANCE H• METERED SEWER (SCHEDULE SO APPLICATION Appplicot*~O~ tq any s er service customer desirigg;;to motor X11 sevrege net monthly rate effluent from R sin le customer location and not otherwise classified "under tgig ordinance. NET MONTHLY RATE Facility Charge $130.00 Volume Charge $1:60/10000 gallons INDUSTRIAL. SURCHARGE n addition to 'the -above charge for commercial and industrial, there` will be added to the net monthly rate `an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu-Vu (tau-2663 B'+ [Su-2603 s}) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X* Vu is the `billing volume for user X. Bu is the tested DOD level for user X or 260 mg/1, whichever is greater. B BOD per 1,000 gallons ($0.000590) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 260 tag/1, whichever is greater. S ($0.000596) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING $125.00 PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require' special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the 'spacial f&cilities'rider. PAGE 43 - WATER 4 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE ,I PRORATION 01 UTILITY HILLS a) billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings''annually. Formula; Actual days in reading period x Customer charge aye b) billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate 'block. f'aruula: Actual days in reading period x, (iAL is reie block x RATS per 3~- 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 44 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE :,.'..-...rr-,rrs ~Frc^-'„~le•p'°: ;r"p•y°v lryFRFka'"' ~}!Q^2P.5*'~_; _.7 "7RTA" -iii "7 i . nr Anem 19M OW&A Z2 HIM OM 21 X111 . r, ~s-C1tID= 87) APPLICATION Applicable for O n$l~►;family residential sewer customers individually, petered apertmente or mobile homes or multi-foatly facilities with lose than 4 units outside of the corporate limits of the City of°Denton and also receiving water from the City of Denton. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge $4.50 per month 2) Volume Charge $2.25 per 1000 gallons of effluent 8il~i~►g,shall'be based on, niaety*~ight (98%) percent, of water co#iueption . but, shall not exceed .a xisum of t4onty~fL*e thooiiaad (25;000),;, gall~onsi., Monthly ~iilli,pggs for the 04riod March through Novs~rber shall be' b0id on ; the average ` monthly rate of Mater consumption during the 'imi44tately prior months Of Decaaber throe h rebrua, . Billings,, for 'the months of December, througgh Fobruary shall bb 'based ~,,n actual consumption, New reitdontial.custoiiers who. do not have` a full prior non- irrigattonal history (December through February) will have a maximum bill based on ninety-ei ht (98x) percent of water consumption or ten thousand (10,000) gallons of water consumption, whichever is foss until a rion-irrigational water consumption history is established. MINIMUM BILLING $4.50 per month PAYMENT Bills are due when rendnred, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge aye PAGE 45 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE T c s, c n. n e , Sgnxd~c s w "hSs A TaT 7`7777 x!°,v' p! b) Oilli~ for the sever effluent shall bo basdd on 30 days per *oath to detbrliiae the gallon effluent to be charEed to each rate block. ~'ozd~ula. Actual days in reading period x CAL in rate block x RATE per 30 1,000 gallons in rate block pAG 46 WA $9 & SEWER RA' E Oltl}ItyA~ICE ,r g, M v l iF ..s. . ,r •"'FFl:;F. tRi'r;'Y ?I ~.s.r ,mss, 7. v 1 .'P .g+r+r.l.. +.i'^pT'R4'VF"; a.nt ' son Imes 12 Usin WHOM i~$ APPLICATION Applicable to all residential facilities not also receiving metered water seryioe'Voss'the Olty of Denton,, including sub. dirrisious, for epert"bts mobile hove parks, or other residential service users..Y60 moathly`char a will be based on the maximum =number of residential units in the area served during the month times the volume and facility charges. NET MONTHLY RATE In Corporate Outside Corporate Limits Limits 1) Facility Charge $2.25 per month $3.35 per month 2) Volume Charge $1.50/1000 gale. $2.25/1000 gals. Volume charge will be for five thousand (5,000) gallons per swath. MIN MUM BILLING $ 9.75 per month/ $14.60 par mouth/ per resident unit per resident unit PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in'readin period x customer charge ays b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block. Formula: Actual days in reading period x GAL in rote block x RATE per 30 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGA 47 -WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE s fi .57 i lv I ti: ~T ii ail ,r ppRnrm..~..p,n.a.'I -•~A F"r .k.. , Y`y'r,^-....q Y'Y! 'r4:7~i f l 'n Y ^ ri j Y K. COMMCIAL INDUSTRIAL SEWER SERVICE OUTSIDE CITY 01- Var"M LIMITS (SGNOM 99) APPLICATION Applicable to all comaorcial, industrial or any other facility not otrierwiso covered under_ this ordinance outside the corporate limits of the City of Denton and receiving sewer service from the City of Denton. NET MONTHLY RATE 1) Facility Charge: $9.75 par month 2) Volume Charge $2.40/1000`$also billing basid' on eighty (80x) percent `of monthly water consumption. INDUSTRIAL SURCRARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cuovu ([Bu-2601 B + [Su-2601 S1) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 260 mg/1, whichever is greater. B BOD per 1,000 gallons ($0.000885) is the unit coat factor for treating one unit. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 260 mg/l, whiche3ver'is'greater# S (=0.000894) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING $9.75 per month PAYMENT Bills are due what rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All aervices whi'sh require special facilities' in order to moot customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 48 - MATER is SEWER RATE ORDINANCE i PKMT1014 OF UTILITY BILLS a) swing for ' the Facility chat$* *hall be. based on 12 bill3nBs annually. Foraula: Actual days to reading sriod x customer charge aye PAGE 49 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE 7-71 e. t L. METERED SEWER OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS (SCHEDULE S10) APPLICATION Application to any sewer service customer desiring to meter all sewage effluent from a single customer location and not otherwise classified under this ordinance. NET MONTHLY RATE Facility Charge $195000 Volume Charge $2.40/1,000 gallons INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE i In addition to the above charge for commartcial' and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: t Cuwu ((Bu-260] B + (9u-2601 s)) WhEre: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 260 mg/l, whichever is greater. B BOD per 1,000 gallons ($0,000885) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit. Su is th9 tested SS level for user X or 260 mg/l, whichever is greater. S ($0.000894) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING $195.00 PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in, order to meet customer's `service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PAGE 50 - WATER & SEWER RATE ORDINANCE r PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS a) Billing ao the Facility charge shall be based on 1? billings Formula: Actual da a in reading period x customer charge ays b) Billing for the sewer effluent shall be based on 30 days per month to determine the gallon effluent to be charged to each rate block. li. Formula: Actual da s in readin period x GAL in rate block x RATE per Is 1,000 gallons in rate block PAGE 51 - WATER SEWER RATE ORDINANCE SECTION Ii. That if any section, subaection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or appplication thereof to 'Any arson or,cirauastanoes is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall beoome.effective'on December 1, 1984; 3 rovided, however, that the provisions of Article II, "Water Rate choduloa", and Article III, "Sower Rat* Schodul`es", shall bo offective apppplyy to and be charged on all billings *Ad* on or after December 1, 1984. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1984. KICHM 13. , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: MUMOTTE =No CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY:~ { s- PAGE 52 - WATER 6 SEWER RATE ORDINANCE ciryot Dsmo, rsxAS MUNICIPAL SU1LDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 ! TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager FROM; Jerry Clark, City gngineer DATE: October 1, 1954 is RE: Ridgeway Drive Final Payment The project was completed on October 19, with the last of the cleanup. A total of 135 work days were used. Days allotted were 125 but the ma or Orton of the pproject. was done in 100 work days as state. he two detour/connections to Teasley required 10 days longer than estimated. Since the contractor pursued the work diligently, no penalty is recommended. Final roject amount is $434,689.18 as compared to the $427,238.16 estimate. The overrun resulted from extra fill having to be hauled in to replace excavation of poor quality and shrinkage. Some savings occurred on fences and asphalt patch to help offset the costs. In conclusion, the road has worked as designed and provides a beautiful drive in a location already used by many people. Jerr oar City 1~ gi er is #+0259E ,i J L, 71- 7 ,`bI f VYMONTHLY ESTIMATE ~ u r~~ '~Te of Work c+v-mo+ constrUQt on Estimate No, mroject Name ,,,•Ridaeway Drive Contract Awarded 1-28-84 Frog: To Contract Amount 542.7.2,3Q,.26 , ,istimateld Per od / Rrom: , i9 , to Df. 19 Calendar Days tacoe-public Company-Box 250-Denfon,TxAl lotted 100 T2A DE CRIPTION UNIT RIW' T po "'NE .VMour T o-Way L S. Lu~p`"sum T"I 36 Ob0 Q~d 7o ro 4-i4sly- 0, COMD&Cted fill C.Y._ 31940. 2.25 71 1 e64 6" me Su ra e 5.Y. 27 68~. LL _ .;,2' - ~ated Lime T~~S 160. ~7 _.~•OO... -1 611 Type G Asphalt _ S•Y._ 1,951.°%_.:_-i .00 14,936..• ^3. 1O.'i' 7.5 f{ " Type G Asntt]~ I -S' Y y 12 14 6_. , 00.,._ t q __lLT~qw Asphalt_ _ _S.Y. 14,104. /1Z•?.?s50 Tin - 50~ _ 54.~00- r 300 00 2 •~oo,ou 42 ~Ss A ConCZete_ - C.Y. 8• 9 lass 44_0 Reinforcing Steel LSS. 735. _7 _T g 530. 17 ..d0 &11. co c " L.F. F 18" R.C.P. L#F. 4124 ~V -.21x00 . J, SUS,uo L-1 18" afety Ends - 6: 1 Pair 45Q* „00_ _L. F _ 365. _ 30~ OQ: f~ s ° v -1 2411 1R. C. P. 27" R.C.P.• : 22s ZO f _351d4 Z-44_eq- 5,. r+ R.C.P. Iy~_~ 26.5:.:: ~,~(r~•_ - -4~n~Q__ ./»~0 afaty Ends S =J f, 7 , + Each 1 • / - 1000.00y , to 61 curb inlet Al Mkhbl~lp Eac.h.._._....:.3:. 3•_.__. 1175.QQ ,3,_52~2Y 1, xhiet 46400) in, TDIat - - 4ch 1 1 IO 0 apQ~~'. 5.00 uQ, Each 124 b inn Gutter L,F. 9 790. 4 v. 5.2 atwor 86, 8.Y 2 00 L %1 ^ F?,:T"'" ~ ^'.p•n^.',: .r^.nrn m r ; - ~ e° ` M61 IoY B$TNATI v of Work A 0,910. Bttimata Noy' U ',koj*ct'$ww Ridaewav Drive - Pace '2 Cgntraet Awdrled From: To Contr*t Amount , ''timat~d Period From, , 19 to 19 Cckl(lndar Days -)ntractor Allotted t.f t ' i D CRIPTION UNIT 9XW1 T DONE OL ~~fr)t'~7 36 Replace Ex s T 'rences L. ~ 5b _ 1 L F. - 90 n 0 27Z 7 ig gene c. ertified Total Amount I A Correct Plus Extra Work $ fIYO,UO ate 2 > 19 Total Amount of Work Done $013 Rproved Less 9b Retained $ &te 24 , 19& Difference $ ~LL Less Previous Payments Amount Due This Estimate ~4 .5. ,i. 1• ak 1 .f }.f. d. .T J~ .,e~ Ai V J~ 1 ~A'H 71~ IV,, 77 717-T7 y., r Mp~q~~, dbd~aftMM CITY OF DENTON MEMORANDUM Vbl 'ACT !f iQan DATE: October 2, 1984 r: • TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager ' FROM: Jeff Meyer, Director of Planning and Community Development SUBJECT: HANDI-HOP F. The city's trap ortation program for the `handicap ed' has experienced a d%matic increase in ridership, Tha~'a the good news. The bad news is that the program now ;costs move than it'was allocated. The August payment put Handi-Hop ;404.50,over bud at, The September statement, which covert use in August, is 12,102,U0. I am holding that statement. The,-,'City's con- tractor' SPAN, estimates that the October statement, which covers September, will total $1,789.00. That is a total over run of $4,341.00. Out of which fiscal year should SPAN be paid for the services rendered? Are there any special procedures to be followed? There is an alternative. The City could decide that SPAN vio- lated the contractual amount and then refuse to pay for the services rendered, Whatever the answer is to the current problem, it seems apparent that the amount budgeted for the 1984-1985 fiscal year, $12,000, will be inadequate. Please let me know how you wish for me to proceed. e e is 03U7j p ; ~