Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-20-1984
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 0ENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL November 20, 19$4 hieeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, November 20, 1984 at 2:00 p,m, Ill the parking lot of the Municipal Building at which the following item will be considered; 2:00 p.m. 1. Depart for tour of lake Ray Roberts, Work Session of the City of Delltoll City Council on Tuesday, November 20, 1984, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building at which tiie following items will be considered: 5;30 P.M. 1. Receive a report from the Denton County Tax Appraisal District representatives, 2. Receive findings and recommendation of a new computer- ized Municipal Court system, 3. Receive a report on the bid process for the Library security detection system (Bid H 9347), 4. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, November 201 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building at which the following items will be considered: 7:00 p,m. t 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 4, 1984, 2, Consent Agenda: Each of tnese items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda autliorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations, City of Dentoll City Council Agenda Navemoer 20, 1984 `Page Two i Plats and Replats; 1, Consider approval of preliminary plat of American Stores Center, Block 1, Litt 1, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 2. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Carroll Point Addition, Block 1, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, 3. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Cimmaron Addition, Blocks A and B, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Consider approval of amendment of site plan of an existing specific use permit an a 13,7 acre tract at 2800 Fort Worth Drive (S-154), (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 5. Consider approval of preliminary plat of Country View Mobile Home Park, (The . Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 6. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of the J. W, Erwin Subdivision, Block 1, Lots ZR and 3R. (The Planning and Zoning Commissiun recommends approval,) 7. Consider approval of final re plat of the Milton Court Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 8. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Paisley Street Addition, crhe Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 9. Consider a roval of final replat of the Sun Valley Addition, Block A, Lot 13, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 10, Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Kelsoe Addition, Lot 11 Block 1, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approvals) r c City Of Denton, City Council Agenda Novesnuer 20, 1984 Page Three 11, Consider approval of site plan and final replat of Township II, Please II, Block A, Lot 4C, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 12. Consider upproval of final replat of the Watley Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, (formerly Blount Addition), (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 13. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Westgate Heights Addition, (The Planning anti Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 14. Con!~ider approval of preliminary plat of the Windsor West Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 3. Appearance by Bob Schmitz concerning property at 221 North Locust, 4. Pun11e Hearings; A. Z-1683, This is the petition of W, S. Nash requesting a change in zoning from the single family (SF-7) classification to the planned development (PD) clas,-.Ification on a 15, 1 acre tract located on the west side of Stuart Road approximately 700 feet norta of Windsor Drive. If approved, the planned development will permit the development of 96 zero lot line units (typical lot size 401x1101), (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial,) B, Z-1698. This is the petition of Keith A, Rubeck requesting a change in the zoning classification from single family (SF-7) to multi-family (MF-1) on a tract of approximately 8 acres situated east of and abutting Bernard Street, south of and abutting Collins Street and west of Cleveland Street and more fully described as lot 6,1, block 513, on Alexander Hill Survey, Abstract #623, Denton, A townhouse 'condominium project comprising approximately 119' units is proposed for the site, (The Planning and Zoning Commission nas no recommendation,) C. Z-1703. This is the petition of L;nry S. Miller Company requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) diettrict on a 243,3 acre 'tract located on the north side of 1-358, approximately City~of Denton City Council Agenda 'Novemut. r 20, 198 1 Page Four 1,800 feet east of Loop 288, If approved, the planned development will permit tt►e following uses; 57,1 acres - office (0) 29,1 acres - multi-family (k4F-2) 61,5 acres - light industrial (LI) 95,7 acres - commercial (C) (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval,) D. Z-1704, This is the petition of Henry S, Miller Company requesting a change in zo►iing from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) district on a 57 acre tract located on ti►e east side of Loop 288, approximately 2,200 feet north of I 358. if approved, the planned development will permit the following land uses; 30,1 acres - light industrial (LI) 27.0 acres - multi family (MF-2) (Tile Plnning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 5. Ordinances; A, Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date, 8. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing for an effective date, C. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of B. L. Arpher for annexation of 31,027 acres located at the southwest corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FNH2181) (A-8). D. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings regarding the annexation of approxima'~,nly 5 acres of land located north of Hignway. 380 West and adjacent and west of Masch Branch Road (A-9), City of Denton City Cou►►cil Agenda NpvWber 20, 1984 Page five B, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date time and place for public nearings regarding the petition of Myers Development Corporation for annexation of approximately 131,7 acres located sout,i of Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road (A-10), F, Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of Walter DeRonde for annexation of approximtely 112 acres located west of I-35E service road and north of Marshall Road and east of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (A-12), i G. Consider adoption of an ordinance quit claiming Center Street in the I.O.O.F. Cemetery. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) H. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for the creation of a Library Board; to provide for the adoption of policies governing the operation of the Library; repealing all ordinances in conflict therewith; and providing for an effective date. (The Library Board recommends approval.) 1. Consider ado pt ion of an ordinance revising Section 25,24 of the Code of Ordinance regarding pro rata street light costs, (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval,) J. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing an engineering services contract with Freese and Nichols, Inc. for the design of ground water storage tank at the Water T'eatment Plant, (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval.) K. Consider adoption of an ordinance `approving an annual software maintenance agreement for the Utility Billing System, known as "CIS", and meter record system, (The. Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval,) L, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a funding agreement between the City of Denton and Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN); authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement; the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. (The Human Resources Advisory Committee recommends approval,) City of Denton 4ity Council Agenda' November 20, 1984 Page six M. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a funding agreement between the City of Denton and Denton City-County Day Nursery; authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement; the exponditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date, (The Human Resources Advisory Committee recommends approval,) N, Cons'lder adoption of an ordinance authorizing the expenditure of funds by the City of Denton for participation in a municipal electric job training program and approving the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing for an effective date, 6. Resolutions; A. Consider approval of a resolution approving the newly revised policy manual for the Denton Public Library as rewritten by the Denton Library Board, (The Library Board recommends approval.) B. Consider approval of a resolution for the development of a County.-wide transportation plan for Denton County, • C. Consider approval of a resolution creating a City of Denton Health Facilities Development Corporation, 7. D-37, Consider disposition of excess Henry Street (Sherman Drive) right-of-way, (Tie Planning and Zoning Commission and Ltevelopment Review Committee recommend approval,) 8. D•38. Consider disposition of City property located at the northeast corner of Bonnie Brae and Scripture Street, (The Planning and Zoning Commission and Development Review Committee recommend approval.) 9. Consider strategy for proposed street bond election, 10, Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments New Business Th's'item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future,agendas. C H R T I F I C A T R I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the, day of 1984 at Ij o'clock a,m ry~', f AAW CITY S RBTARY 1566C AQVNDA CITY OF DVNTON CITY COUNCIL November 20, 1984 M00 ting of tae City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, November 20, 1984 at 2;00 1). m, in tile parking lot of the Municipal Building at which tite following item will be considered: 2,00 p. m. Dopart for tour of Lake Ray Roberts, llork Session of the City of Denton City council on Tuesday, Nuvombor 20, 1984, at 5;30 p. m. in the Civil Defense Room of the Hunicipa t Bu[lditig at which tite following items will be considered; S;30 p.m. 1, Recolve a report from the Denton County Tax Appraisal District roprosentatives. 2. Receive findings and recommendation of a new computer- ized Municipal Court system. 3, Receive a report on the bid process for the library security detection system (Bid it 9347), 4, Executiv Session; A. Legal Matters Wader Sec, 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A,T,S. B, Real Estate Undor Sec, 2(f), Art, 6252.17 V. A, T, S. C, Personnei Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V. A. T. S. D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T,S. Regular Meetingg of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, November 20, 1~J84, at 7,00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Municfpa I Building at whim the following Items wi11 be considered: 7:00 p.m, 1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 4, 1984, 2. Consent Agenda: hacn of tnese items is recommended by the Staff and approval thoreof will be strictly oil the basis of the Stuff recommondat,ions. Approval of the Consent Agenda autnorizos tine City Manager or liIs designee to iIII plement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. (;ity of Dontt;m City Couucll Agenda Novemuor 20, 1984 Page Two A. Plats and Roplatst 1, Consider approved of prolimillary plat of American Stores Canter, Block 1, Lot i, (Tho Planlllllg and Zoning Commission recommends approved,) 2, Collsidur al, roval of proliminary plat of the Carroll Pont Addition, Block I. (Tho Planning and 'Lolling Commission rocomplon(1s approval, 3. Consider appruval of preliminary plat of the Clmmoron Addition, Blocks A and B, (The Plalilt itiI And Zoning Commission recoullnolids a pprml ) il, Consider approval of aulelidlilent of site plan of an existing specific use permit on a 13,7 acre; tract at 2800 Fort Worth Drive (The Platuling and toning Commission rucommeilds approval,) 5. Consider approval of preliminary plat of Country View Mouile dome Park, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of tlii, J. W, Erwin Subdivision, Block 1, Lots ZR an-i 3R. ('file Planning and Zoning Commission recommeads approval.) 7. Consider approval or final replat of the Milton Court Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, (The Planning and 'Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 8, Consi-der approval of preliminary plat of the Paisley Street Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Com~iission recommends approval,) 9. Consider a, pprovai of final replat of the Sun Valley Ad'Jition, Block A, Lot 13, (Tile Planning Wd Zoning Commission recommends a pproval., ) 10, Consider appzoval of preliminary plat of the Kelsoe Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) City of upnton City Council Agotula Noveutl,o1, 20, 1984 Page Three 11. Consider approvBt of site plait and final roplat of TOWNship 11, Pfiaso Il, Block A, Lot 4C. (The planning and 7.otiing Commission recommends approval,) 12. Considor approval of flnat re plat oC the Watley Addition, Block 1, Lot 1, (formorly Blount Addition), (The Planning and Zoning Commission rocommends approval,) 13, Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Westgate ileIgats Addition, (Tito Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) lit. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the Windsor Wost Addition, (The Planning turd Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 3• Appearance by Bob Schmitz concerning property at 221 North locust, 4, Puolic Hearings; A. Z-•1683, This is the potation of 44, S. Nash roquesting a cha,igo in zoning from the single family (SV.•7) classification to the p.lanit ed development (PD) classification on a 15,1 acre tract located on the west side of Stuart Rood approximately 700 feet norta of WIndsar Drive, If a;1proved, ti« 11anned doveloputent tgilt permit the development of 96 zero lot line Lill its (typical lot size 401x110'), (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends donial,) B, Z-1698, This is the petition of Keith A, Rubeck requesting a change in the zoning classification from single family (SF..7) to multi-family (Mr-1) oil a tract of approximately 8 acres situated east of and abutting Bernard Street, south of and abutting Collins Street and west of Cleveland Street and more fully described as lot 6.1, block i13, on Alexander liill Survey, Abstract 0623, Uentoti. A townhouse condominium project comprising approximately 119 units is proposed for the site, (The PIall riIng and Zoning Commission nas no recommendation,) C, Z-1703. This is the petition of Henry S. Miller company requesting a cnange in zoning frum the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) district on a 243,3 acre tract located on the north side of 1-358, approximately C1ty Ot D011tpn City Council Agenda November 20, J984 Page Four 11800 feot east of 1,001) 288, if approved, the planned development will pormIt the following uses; 57,1 acres office (0) '9.1 acres - multifamily (MF-2) 61.5 acres - lighc industrial (LT) 95.7 ar.res - commercial (C) {Tho Planning an(I 7 0 111 ng C01111111SSiOIL recommends a ppr ova 1 . ) D. Z-1704, This is the petition of I131iry S, Nit Ilor Company requesting a change in ZOOng from thr. agricultural (A) district to the plannl dove Iolxnent (PD) district on a 57 acre tract located on tine east side of Loop 288 approximately 2,200 feet north of 1 351;. ti:' approved, the planned develolrnent will permit thf) following land usest 30,1'arres light industrial (LT) 27,0 acres - multi family (Nip-2.) ('t'he Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 5. Ordinances; A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitivo bids and awarding a contract for the purchase of materials, equiluornt, supplies or services; providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an offective date. B. Cnnsider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for tho award of contracts for public works or improvements; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing for an effective elate. C. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a (late, time and place for public hearings regarding the petition of B. L. Archer for annexation of 31.00 acres located at the southwost corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (012181) (A-8). 0. Consider adoption of an ordinance setting a date, time and place for public ncarlsngs regarding the annexation of approxiiiiately 5 acres of land located north of Iligiiway 380 nest and adjacent and west of Masch Branch Road (A••9). City of Denton City Council Agondu November 20, 1984 Page Hive 13. Consider adoption of an ordinance; setting a date, 11610 ar,d placo for public hearings rogarding tite ;petition of My ors Dovo1olHnoit t Corporation for axinoxatioil of approximately 131,7 acres located sout'ii of Robinson (toad and oust of Nowlin Road (A-10). F. Consider adoption of an ordinance sottinl,'a date, time and place Ivor public hearings regarding the petition of Walter DeRoildo f1)r annexation of approximtely 112 acres located ,rest of I. 551-, service road and north of Marshall Road and oast of the Topeka and Santa Fo Railway (A-12). G. Consider adoption of an ordinance quit claiming Cell ter street in the I,O,O.F. Comotery. (The Planning and Zoni;lg ComIII ission recommends approval,) H. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for the creation of a Library Buard; to provide for the adoption of policies governing the operation of thG Library; repoa11ng all ordinances in conflict therowith; and providing for an effective date.. (The Library Board recommends approval,) 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance revising Section 2S. 24 of the Code of Ordinance regarding pro rata :,tre(" t light costs, (The Public Utilities Board roc oms,~ends approval,) J. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing an engineering sorvicov; contract with Freese and Nichols, Iisc. for the design of ground water storage tank at the Water Treatment Plant. (The rubric Utilities Board recommends approval.) K. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an annual, software maintenance agreement for tIt o Utility Billing System, known as "CIS", aria meter record system. (The Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval.) L. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a funding agreement between the City of Denton and Services Program for Aging Noods (SPAN); authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement; the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date, (The Human Resources Advisory Committee recommends approval,) City of Denton City Council Agenda November 20, 1934 Page Six M. Consider adoption of an ordinance itppi,0Ving a funding agroumant betwoon tire City of Denton and Donton City-County Day Nursery; authorizing that Mayor to execute the agroontent; the exponditure of funds therefore; and providing for an effective date. ('rho Human Resourcos Advisory Committoo recommends approvaI.) N, Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the oxpendit.ure of funds by the City of Denton for participation in a mull IC.1pa I electric job training program and approving the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing for an effective (late. 5. Resolutions; A. Consider approval of a resolution approving the newly revised policy manual for the Denton Public Library as rewritten by the Donton Library Board. (The Library Board recommends approval.) B. Consider approval of a resolution for the ee•velopment or a Countywide transportation plan for Denton County. C. Consider approval of a resolution creating a City of Denton Health Facilities Dove Iopnent. Co rPura tion. 7. D-37. Consider disposition of excess Henry Street (Snerman Drive) right - of - fray, ('file Planning and Zoning Commission and Do voIopmeit t Review Committee recommend approval,) 8. D-38. Consider disposition of City property located at the northeast corner of Bonnie Brae and Scripture Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission and Development Review Committee recommend approval.) 9. Consider strategy for proposed street bond election. 10. Official Action on Executive Session Items; A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments 11, New Business; Th's item provides 'a section for Council Members to suggest items for futuve agondas. C 6 R 'r I F i C A T F: 1 certify that the above notice of meeting was postod on the bulletin board at the City lfall of tho City of Denton, Texas, on the clay of 19811 at o'clock (a,m.) (p, m.) CITY SECRETARY 15 660 7, 1984 _ .'..1 VCi' 1. ,JC', l?. .i i!•. t\' Qi Is 'IX C:C V. ee 1 Er C :;iC.]' r.)',:_a ~3et:1, 'n-l1 :oC]i of iP_:Ql'~cit] C:I 17,' ti- ii'1. In.>1]fJ~l. by .,..'i_;IVP C]ilt'.. 0" t.f1E'].I ..St, cu the 6c)~:n x-ritat]on level IID_::11~~31.1.y i..rwit.h ii f'Cllliii.'dclal. fo:c:e Was unable to lcx-6t_e a cawlel'c_al kiCl:acle tl-~'t w,'s 6ove1op.~)a t0 on a caril.,,uter similar to the City of L(alt.onls calll.tter, 'l~)C' fC)1101ti],1')7 r-a;ii¢arizes the fll"1351''.^,s -1-ncl rc;..ExlI'~li:'1"lc:at.)oll5 Of {-,he t' .%:s1: fUiC'(:: :i ]S a !~l:F'~~ 1.13 uL]]t t0 t.lla I"/;:e l_llil.l. i)c:iy f12'1(]].17^.S that 113VC- D_''£: r>:°_t l',.C-1 I0 )'Ci,II' " The San Nicjelt: systam wars written for an 13M Systan 34 and was Lti:sc~i alo,md an exterls.ve Inicrofillming system. The miorofilJning systev, v.-as installed at n Til'loelo .7t a cost of $38,040. It is estiri-atcd 0-•ht it would ic-qui.Ce 2.UT>: O?;iJIF3tC'.1)' $30,000 of convet'sian effort. tb C'on e.r't, tn4. &ystclli to the _ 7'j' i i18 hit) -it) of D.iJltoll s rnnputel- q.t?':. ; ^,aIl), lt. WCuId ~.rsfi. ' 1.:1:)1?ro?.:IJi<Btely yS17,444 t.0 tll° C I lei, A the i. into of our Visit:, the City of r':i. 't'.•_;•:']U Ey.r' Fin (liL 11Uf.. l>IC. >S t;, 1 'ha1yj ti6aAs. ~ 7rne C1ty of Br}'r71] Ifftllli.C'i l'.31 CiJ',ir"t =j'S 'LC'1Cl 15 on a C'C7T1T7,1t C'1' CI'IV11'C~?'iF~ft'It s]If"t] l.ar f_o Lbe City of liki[?ts a rn:::L'ar of :>=alt.on `s I'lexAs, the City c'f l:;ryar1 vmi e3itly cicr s not jvxvss pziv ci q li I n 101 C jA; "S x" 1 + a.: , i'!, n i i vy LT I. lu ! "Pi.•Q' 1 .~.i '•1 : ,..+:Jt rat, .:'tit. f. 7. I.,. (,..1{), r 99 1"! t..,..-y .C'] 17... >s. IM 0.t';' I i. _ t , "Is AI 'In A 1-0 of iri9I.,o"KO,.b Unt. 2S a; 1',aA 'MY (','1:. 'G !•c , E%:lo i•"in.n 11i1 My C1i AmY:1. m' ti t.P 110 " I 1•d. (:l. ,'`~IJ':?!t. tG,'7 due LO till tmt. nVaiC:. :'1:., Y& t.1"ut {:'c:.C ni71tii:'Cr11t~ the st:('( d site visit was f;}:'! • .'l\' ~ i!it ~lj. :•r !r' 1, c7~C. !.~1c 171.'t'K'Ci}Ili-al and IoDist.ical pLol.,,Lms f'i_1G W:c 7"( ' xi rt1]O t. .`.,1.` 1 L i..l !C the p' fCiii}'efl1-7CQ of t_)'.1MMir new syStl'ill. ti. r 1 C w \'3C7 ed that was p2'Cl assi., Onrking ti MOO.: t`o,` ~C' ,;;\'s 'ot , .,at.1'.e]1'C'- 7.J1;tt11iy C2:a1>il.it 1es U";'r,`.: i l'I'. 1+., t h IN 171 t\' of !1.. Will C',,,Ct Cho. M\ CT r., mV, J. _.'}.rC1o ."C. knots RO 11" ri,.. i 1 1p._i q V. Sts - SA wr~lc h 1: Ac "Od 1:1. t".al d i'•_: e an' 0`.. al on .t L s 17.1'. I 101 ion Alt . ON l .1 : ,i-, . U1". ' ii.h 11 le .',i:. at .1 Cis 1!f the t.!L of Q 'c;s_, -1711.7 'i: I lies Phyl'yi ['}.]11 is is :aor of I?3ta Fro__~Ssing court COB, cc r +:.ty lvicKca31 i C1tY a1 DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TEL EPNONE (817) 56~ MrMORAND*1 TO., Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager PROM; Cary A. Collins, Director of Data Procostling SUBJ; Municipal Court System DATE: October 16, 1984 As you know, Phyllis Morris and I made a rsacond site visit to the City of El Paso to view, 'their Municipal 6'ourt System 'in actual iperation, The following outlines our findings of this systems As we stated in our previous findings, the system at the City of E1 Paso accommodates mo-,(6 of the features requested in our questionnaire than any system we in8pectodb Currently, the system at E1 Paso has, no t(s;er. documentation Wt does make extensive use of ;nenu screens n6d the users of the system appear to be functioning at a high level of productivity without this documentation, At the current time, the Municipal Court personnel are typing-up each complaint urtil the City of El Pa-.,)o implements a text editor system on their main computer which is anticipated in the ne%c two months. The system at the City of El Paco schedules court apprearauces bac+ed upon officer availability and type of court requirements (court reporter or jury) which was a necessity at E1 Paso since they have twelve courts operating each day, The E1 Paso warrant officers record not only the warrants for moving violations and Class C misdemeanors, but also Class A and Class B misdemeanors as well as felony warrants and have inquiry capabilities to all of the warrants issued in the city of El Paso cot:rts, The City of E1 Paso system also tracks moving violations, parking tickets, etc, on military personnel and reports nre produced and sent to Port Bliss for resolution by the military authorities, 2'INICIPAL COURT SYSTEM - EL PASO Page z , All parking tickets are in essence a self-addressed postage free envelope and the mail-in payments are handled by one person in the cashiering area of the Municipal Court, The El Paso system does an excellent job of tracking tickets issued to each officer and the current statusi lost, void, written, etc. can :,e viewed at any time via terminal, Continuous cash balancing is performed on each person by each cash drawer, etc,, and a batch report of all cash received is produced nightly to be balanced against actual cash in the cash drawers. At this time receipts are not produced by the system rather the ticket is stamped paid, but a printed receipt is possible by merely printing the cash payment screen on the terminal. Since all cash payments are collected 1,n a central location of the Municipal Court, there are terminals in the Court Deputies'of£ice which are used to change the amount of the ticket based uparn the outcome of the court hearing in order to have the proper fine show when the ticket is paid at the central cashiering area. Currently, the City of E1 Paso on a weekly basis is creating a magnetic tape of all unpaid parking violations and sending this tape to Austin to receive owner's names and addresses of the vehicle having received a parking ticket, The current method costs the City of E1 Paso tan cents for each inquiry on the tape, The validity of this data is dependent upon the accuracy and timeliness of the Department of Motor Vehicles' vehicle registration file, In the future, the E1 Paso system will use the county's vehicle registration file since the Data Processing Department is a combined city and county operation, While the City of E1 Paso is still working on some procedural problems, the acceptance of the new system appears to be universal among users and the users are recognizing the benefits to be gained by this system. In regards to the City of Denton, we have a number of questions that need to be resolved before implementing a new Municipal Court System, The folliwing outlines some of these questions; Who will be receiving cash for Municipal Court fines? Who will be responsible for balancing cash received? Will the Police Department have on-line inquiry capabilities to the warrant file and for what time frames during day and week? Will we need a terminal in the courtroom to update fine amounts after court procedings? MUNICIPAL COURT SYSTEM Rh PASO Pa a 3 Will we be tracking tickets issued by North Texas State'Univorsity police officers and Texas Woman's University police officers? Do we want to track studeaits similar to the method E1 Paso is using for military personnel? Do we want to use a self-addressed envelope and a special post office box for parking fines? Can we eliminnte the need for the ticket once the information has been entered into the computer? Do we want to establish a method for sending a tare to Austin on overdue parking tickets similar to the method El Peso is using? How do we want to produce complaints and what is the maximum length of a violation description? How many and what types of permanent dockets will we require from the system? As you can see, some of these questions will have an impact in the finance Department and we should probably include John McGrane in some of our discussions. If you have any questions about this matters, please fael free to call me at any time. Gary A. ollins Director of Data processing cc; G, Chris Hartung, City Manager Gary Matheson, Captain Police Department Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney Phyllis Morris, Court Clerk Howard Watt, Municipal Court Judge rb PRELIMINARY FINbINdS OF MUNICIPAL COURT SYSTEM USED BY BRYAN, TEXAS i gener4ll. Qbservationa: The system we had demonstrated to us at the City of Bryan appear to be more than adequate to meet the needs of the City of Bryan. This system was originally designed and written by the City of Corpus Christi's data processing staff and ties into the City of Corpus Christi's Police Dispatching and Criminal Investigation System, The system is approximately ten years old and the major complaint of the City of Bryan was the lack of good documentation. The City of Bryan has taken on the task of properly documenting the system to meet their needs and anticipates this task will be completed within the next few months. The City of Bryan acquired the system from the city of Corpus Christi in June 1983 and went live in October 1983. In developing the questionnaire, we prepared for the evaluation of a Municipal Court System, We broke the questionnaire into various categories and -subcategories and the following outlines our findings in these various areas. Data U19ti,onary: Common Data Elements for all ticket's.: All elements outlined in the common data elements of our questionnaire with the exception of the following met with our specifications: Ticket status (i.e. active/void/lost/not issued)- while this data element is not specifically spelled out in the City of Bryan system, the City of Bryan did place a code of "v" on their records to indicate a void ticket. Other codes could be used to indicate exception situations such as lost, not issued, etc. Zip Codes - The field for the zip code was only five digits in the City of Bryan system and we had specified a nine digit zip code capability. Amount of Assesed Fine This field was not present in the City of Bryan system, but rather the City of Bryan used only the one amount which we identified in our questionnaire as Initial Fine Amount. Warrant Fee - This field was not present in the City of Bryan system, but again, was treated as one amount that we identified as the Initial Fine Amount. -1- Cashier IA w This field was not present in the City of Bryan system but there was a cash drawer indicator that was used for entering fine payments and used in balancing out the cash drawers at the end of the day or any time during the day as desired. Refund Check ID - This field was not present in the city of Bryan system. There was no alternate field present for this information. Days Sentenced - This field was not present in the City of Bryan systemr but they had a method of applying credit to the defendant, for time spent in ,fail. Days Suspended - This field was not present in the City of Bryan systemr but again, this was treated as the days sentenced above. The following :fields were not'present in the City of Bryan systemr but they indicated these fields were present in the Corpus Christi Police Dispatching and Criminal Investigation System where these fields had more relevance, Business Address Remarks (Comments) Height Occupation Witnesses Information Tax Time in Court Moving Violation Dependent Data: All data elements outlined in our questionnaire were met with the exception of the following items: Weather Condition - This field was not present and no provisions were made to gather and track this information. Road Surface - This field was not present and no provisions were made to gather and track this information. Wreck (Y14) - This field was not present, but the City of Bryan used the violation code to indicate if an accident occurred or did not occur as a result of the violation. Radar Speed - This field was not present, but the City of Bryan did not differentiate between alleged speed and radar speed but indicated by violation code if the speed was -2- determined by tho use of radar, Vehicle owner's Information - The City of Bryan 'dill not make provisions for this information to be gathered and tracked, Parkin 't'icket Dependent Datas All data elements outlined in our questionnaire were met with the exception of the following items: Parking Space Number - The City of Bryan system did not provide for this since they did not have parking spaces designated by number, Meter Number - The City of Bryan system did not provide for this since they did not have parking meters. In general the City of Bryan processed a very minimal amount of parking tickets, Misdemeanors up to $200 Dependent Data.: The system at the City of Bryan only captures' the ID number as outlined in the City of Denton's questionnaire, All other data elements were considered to be pertinent to a Criminal Investiga- tion System by the City of Bryan staff and, therefore, not captured or reported in the Municipal Court system, AniigQl control Dependent Data: The system at the City of Bryan was capable of capturing the data elements outlined in the Denton questionnaire but only as a remarks area on the ticket. This means the information could be available but retrieval of information based upon one or more of these data elements would br? extremely difficult. Birth and Death Records: All data elements requested in the city of Denton's questionnaire were missing from the City of Bryan system, In the opinion of the City of Bryan staff, the processing of birth and death records would be a completely separate system from the Municipal Court System. Input Documents to Municipal Court Systemt All documents outlined in the City of Denton's questionnaire could be processed by the City of Bryan systems but it was recommended that as much standardization as possible be provided for with these documents, The City of Bryan had redesigned their tickets to more closely correspond to the format of the inpat screen for ease and speed in entering information. -3- Syst9w C i s eyyired Capabilities Secti'on► The City of Bryan supported all of the requirements in this section with the following exceptionst While the City of Bryan system does not support agencies as a separate data element, it could support a code as the leading character of the ticket number thus providing for 26 separate agencies. The City of Bryan system supported up to 9999 violation codes thus surpassing the number of violation codes required in the City of Denton questionnaire. The City of Bryan system could not cross-referenced the agency code with an agency description since there was not a specific data element for agency within the City of Bryan system. Other CapabilitiesI The City of Bryan sy4item met the specifications outlined. in the City of Denton questionnaire with the following exceptionst The City of Bryan system did not support a cross-referet►ce file for validation of officer badge number and officer name. This feature could cause a potential problem for the City of Denton since we reissue the badge numbers of police officers. Separate court docket numbers are to be assigned by type of violations. The City of Bryan system did not segregate the docket numbers by type of violations, i.e., moving, parking, others but the system did produce a report showing separate totals, listing, etc, by type of violations for state reporting purposes. The City of Bryan system maintains a detailed history of all disposed cases for two months as opposed to the twelve months specified in the cJty of Denton questionnaire. With the City of Bryan system, the history of disposed cases past two months is maintained on tape backup files, but is not available for on-line inquiry. Selective Purging of Historical Records: The City of Bryan e,(stem has no capabilities to selectively purge disposed cases from its history file since this function is automatically performed each two months. User Help Screens; The City of Bryan did not have any help screens for displaying violation codes and subcodes in an on-line mode but rather used a printed cross-reference reported. Due to the extensive availability -q_ of violation codes, i.e., 9999, it would require approximately 400 separate screens to display all violation codes _Qrosa- Ref'eren_qqton ii a aea= The City of Bryan sytitem did not allow for a Gross-reference of a violator's name to one or more aliases, Again, the City of Bryan staff felt that this feature was more applicable to a Criminal Investigation System. On-,Line Terminal, Inqu ries: The City of Bryan system had inquiry capability only by one of the following fields: Court Docket Number - Warrent or Arrest Number Ticket Number The City of Bryan system did produce a cross-reference showing ticket number and court docket number. Display Conten : The City of Bryan system provided for all the individual violation information but did not provide for any summary information concerning offenses or fines. Since the City of Bryan system has inquiry only by Docket number or Ticket Number, the specifications to inquire on summary data by last name, date of birth, etc, would not be possible. Some of our specifications would seem to be better suited for reports in that we would want to see summary information on all defendants of a specified sex or race or date of birth, etc, The City of Bryan system retains history on disposed cases for on-line purposes for only two months as opposed to one year as specified in the City of Denton questionnaire, it should be noted that when the City of Bryan system purges disposed cases from its on-line history it produces an historical report of all disposed cases being dele-ted from the file and no open cases are ever deleted from the files. Reports: We did not examine this section in detail as we did the other sections, but rather had the City of Bryan staff show us each of the reports they received and the use they made of the system, It did not appear that the system was lacking in the report area,. We outlined in our questionnaire. Data Processing Requirements: The system at the City of Aryan seems to meet the specifications outlined in our questionnaire with the exception of the following: -64- On-line programii were written in C1C5 Macro language vs C1CS'command language, since this system was written by another aity!s staff, the annual release of enhancements, technical support, user support, user training, and D.P. training would not be present as it Would be in a commercial package, The City of Bryan has offered to provide the City of Denton staff with initial traini.ngt but it would be the City of Denton's staff responsibility to provide future training and enhancements. I PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF MUNICIPAL COURT SYSTEM USED BY EL PASO, TEXAS General Observationss While the Municl.pnl Court. System at El Paso Is not completely implemented, the capabilities planned for the system most closely met the major criteria outlined in the City of Denton questionnaire of all systems investigated, While this system system originally was designed for Overland Park, Kansas, extensive modifications to the system were made by the City of E1 Paso staff to meet their requirements. At this time the system is in a test stage and operates only in the data processing area and the users bave no access to the system in their normal work environment. It is anticipated that the system will be implemented within two months, Also at this time! the documentation of this system is ineompletel but it is anticipated that the documentation will be complete at implementation time, It should be noted that all of the data processing staff nssociatAd with this project have either resigned or been terminated, This last fact would seem to drastically reduce the City of El Paso's ability to complete this project in the scheduled time frame. In developing the questionnaire we prepared for evaluating a municipal court system, we broke the questionnaire into various categories and subcntegories and the following outlines our findings in these various areas: DATA DICT'IONARYi Common Data Elements for all 'P'ickets: All elements outlined in the common data elements of our questionnaire were met with the following exceptions: Sub Code - There was no provision for this information but the violation code was a five character code which exceeded our requirement by a multiple of at least 100 and, therefore, the sub coder, would be incorporated into the basic violation codes, Cash Bond Time - The system did not make provision for this field 1 I Cash Bond Number - This Information was not captured as a separate entity from ticko't number Receipt Number - This information was not available to the system Cashier ID - This Information Was not available to this system but was carried in another system Refund Check Number - The system did not have this information available but (lid have the amount of the refund and an indicator to show if refund was duce or not . Plea - The system did not have provisions for carrying this information Days Sentenced - The system did not provide for carrying this information Days Suspended - The system did not p' /ude for carrying this information Remarks - Tho system did provide a 25 character field for additional inform.-.Lion but this was generally used for witness information Age - The system did not, carry the age but did have a provision for (late of birth Haight This information was not carried by the system Occupation - This imnformation was not carried by the system . Witness Information- See comment about remarks Time in Court - The L1 Paso System considered this the same as the time of court appearance MOVING VIOLATION CITATIONSi All data elements outlined in the questionnaire met our specifications with the cxeeption of the followingi Weather - The system made no provision for this information Road Surface - The system made no provision for this information 'T'raffic Conditions - The system made no provision for this information Speeding Information Raciar - The system made no provision for this information Description of Vehicle Color The system made no provision for this information Vehicle OwnarIa Information - The S5c~te!.,i made no provision for this information PARKING TICKP,TSs The system will process parking tickets in the most efficient manner of all systems we have seen, All data elements outlined in our questionnaire would be met with the exception of the following= Parking Space Number -The City of E1 Paso regarded this as the same as the meter number. Vehicle Color - The system will have no provisions for this information Vehicle Year - 'file system made no provision for this information MISDEMEANORS UP TO $2001 This portion of the questionnaire was not provided for specifically in the El Paso system but rather by the use of violation codes the system handled the basic information nboi.it the citation, Most of the information requested by this portion of the questionnaire was handled by another system, ANIMAL CONTROL DEPENDENT DA'T'A" The system at E1 Paso made no provision for capturing this data but rather had this information stated on the ticket. Tile situation of escalating fines for repeat citations for the same animal was covered by the violation code. BIRTH AND DEATH R1iCORUSs The City of E1 Paso's system made no provisions for birth and death vecords since this was not a function of the Municipal Court System. INPUT DOCUNNNTS TO MUNICIPAL COURT SYSTFMt All source documents outlined in our questionnaire could be processed by the City of El Paso system. SYSTEM CAPADILITIESt Required Capabilities Sections The City of El Paso system supported all of the requirements in this section with the following exceptionst . The 61 Paso System had no provision for distinguishing the agency issuing the citation The system did not cross reference agency and validate agency sines agency was not a separate field. The system did validate the ticket number that had been issued to an officer and conceivably with proper assigning of ticket numbers this function could be accomplished. Other_Ca abilities The City of L1 Paso System met the requirements outlined in the City of Denton quo,tionnaire with the following exceptionst The system did not maintain separate court dockets, but rather combined all citations into one docket. The system (lid have the capability to create separate dockets for each of five courts and conceivably this capability could be used to separate dockets by type of citation. . The system did not print receipts but did print update dispositions, date paid and amount paid The system will maintain a detailed history for two years and an abbreviated history for five years which is more comprehensive than our specifications indicated The system could not selectively purge information by range of ticket numbers, range of court docket numbers, agency code or violation code . The system did not provide user help screens but did have an extensive menu selection The system did not provide for the capability to ososs reference violator's name with aliases but rather this was a function of the El Paso Police System ON-LINE: TERMINAL INQUIRIM The City of E1 Paso System met the roquireutents outlined in our questionnaire with the following excoptionst Violator's alias - The system did not provide this capability Violator's race - The system did not provide this capability , Violator's Sax - The system (lid not provide this capability Summary Information - The system did not provide any summary information on the screen but rather displayed all citations meeting a specific inquiry criteria and allowed the operator to access the particular citation they were interested in, HEPORTSs Operational Reports The City of El Paso system met the requirements outlined in our gtiestionnaire with the following excoptionst , Number of tickets input and revenues generated - The system did not provide for thi9s capability , Number- of Cases Disposed - This report was on a monthly basis versus a daily basis , Daily Dockets - This was a combined docket as stated earlier but by utilizing the idea of a separate court to separate the types of citations, the system could provide separate daily dockets , ioport Content - In addition to the requirements listed in our questionnaire, the I.l Paso system also shows any witness name or attorney's name All other report requirements outlined in our questionnaire appeared to be met DATA PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS The City of El Paso system met the specifications as 'outlined in the City of Denton questionnaire with the following excoptionst On-line Programs - The on-line map programs for the Ill Paso system ware written using "DAIS" language as opposed to tho CTCS Command language . Since the systom would be provided by another City's staff, the annual release of now enhancoments, technical support, usor Support and user training would not be present as it would be with a software package offered by a commeroial software company PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF MUNICIPAL COURT SYSTEM USED BY SAN ANGSLO, TEXAS The Syst,Lnn we had demonstrated to u. -a at the Ci t:y of Sven Angelo appears to have been designed to speci f i cal 1 y ,newt the needs of the City of Angelo. ThV camputerizod system is intricately integrated with al mi crop i l m system that produres the Source dncument that is used throughout the system. The City of San Angela utilizes an innovative method of printing caseu dispositions on gummed labels to update: their permanent docket. The San Angelo system has an excellent method of inquiry of their database by docket number, name, bi rthdate or a combination of two or more of thew items. At the Current time, the programs to process parking tickets have not been written and no parking tick=ets are being processed. At this time riot all of the moving violations or all of the crimin,:rl complaints are proceti;zed by the sys,terr. Tho criavi ng violations and criminal compl ai nta not being pracesswd by the computer- system are thoFae items with a more complerc compit.in't du>cripticrrr, i..ci?.: failure to yivlcl at ~,Lgp sic~n or, flilurv to yield at yield sign or failLtraa to yield al, intersection, Also at this ttimoa documentation of the syst=em ha> not been completed but is anticipated this task will be comploted in FA ccyuplcr 04 months. In develDpi rig th` gLrC-5tionnairr-, wee pi-Op;-reed for UVFRI rating sI Municipal. Court. System, we broke the gr.resti.onnaire into var-iot.ts categorioss and s;r.tbcategories ,end the following outlines our finding in those vetriau<.s at-eans. DATA ~D 1 { 'J; I ONARY: C:'r~mnlnn_D lt__EL rtner~ s~f,c~r ~~1 1 _Ti-~ All c:)l ernonts Outl. it-ied in the common dot tt el emcnts, of our car WC;ti. onnai re with thr*~, exception of the ((A l ot,ai ng met oor _epeci f i cati onss: City Agency Cudw - Ther(- s,r A.: no provi:-jo-i made for LA separate agency codt:, othor than i <,,ui. r)g _•peci ~r i c r,arigt.'s of tickets to eac.h agency I Ticket Statt.rs (i.e. active/void/lost/naL They systow made no provision for this data rel. anent but rathur hold the officer- accountable for all tickots isbued him/hniI . Zip Code The fi ld for zip'codv was onlly five? digits vL-IrEiLl" the nine digits spocifitad in ot.tr t~ul~sticutnaire Serb Code There was no provision for this inFor-mation in thi San Angr-A n system Cash Pund Date This date wets not Captured but rather- the (::OfWi( tlMl date was L150Ci fOr thi'i dots Cash Bond Tim(: Thc~ syl:tern dirt not makw provision for this field Othe(•• Costs (LCJC) - Whilr~ tho Gyst•em carried this information, this information ways not reported in ony manner Refund Check Number - The systom had the capability to' carry a yes or no indication vor°st.rs a chock' number ac outlined in bur cµ.to®tionnaire . Ti me 2f Court. Appearance The system made- no provision for inTor-muation . Date in Caurt (-trial) - Tho isystem made no provi 5i lall ror- this information . Bui>1.no3 -s Addr-uf~s - Tho mc`ide no provit:1on for this i r7 •f nrm~zt i. un ROMr r`t:i3 ThC' SiyCitC_'m 1119C1r nCl pr`ovi`~ion for- t_hi.6 i of ormctti an Persorral. Chalr-acthri.sticsi.e., height, Weight, tfx, M.c.) The System malde no provisions for this, inform.kHon Information - The system made no provision for this information Time in Caur'L (TI'-ial) ThL, sys.-,terll made no prcivii-Jon for this, insorrnnti on NIOV.T~Gi_VICJLt'~YT•U1V_-_L"I7 f~:~7C1tJf~: Al'i dtita c- It;ments(Altlinuxil irk t h o gi.lcs;ticsnr)a.ire mot our specifications with the f_;;r.trt:ttinn (:)f tho fallowing: . Registra'ition Year - 'rhr, nysitem made. no provision for this information Weather The aystem made no provision for this information . Road Surface The system made no provision for this information . Traffic Conditions - The sytatem madr no provision for this information . Spesading Informrstian Radar - Thee sys=tem rriade no provision for this information Description of Vehicle The system made no provision for this information Vehicle Owner's Information - The sysitem made no provision for this in connectichn r,+ith moving violations This portion of the system has> not lioun implemented at the time of our- visit. The programs and r6crown formats were still being developed and written at. the time of cur visit. In its, proposed form$ the s-ysLem will moet_ the d.M-d,. wlementia specifications outlinr-.d in our" due,t.Li lnsi~+irar with the following exceptions: . Park=ing Space NUMbOr The systcjm will hrive no provisions far this information Vuhiclo Color - The system will have no provisions for this; information Ill Iii[?Er~ll~::F~IVElr,S_Li~'_TQ_`~:'isn; All data eIC-meant.:~ outlined in thp questionnaire met our spec:ificaL.ions with the following uxc:cptions_: . Arrest Numbtr While this field wnR, Ejreraeni_ it arae, in regality the docJ'ut nuMbUr and the>rc: vrsi no di„aLi_nr_tion bott-oven the two natmber_ Hoo Arrcrst 1'11 L~ do (i . o , on vi c!w/c s l l /rVctr'r chit? tt- is inf Or'"matlon wclE andy ulVcll l=a}`l Ci q'I thC i COO"~1J?i!ll'I t;:5 W11Gr'i? cl wearr"al)t had been 1. i3 :,l,VC?Cl Automobile Placed in Pound - The s4y:;tem maclee nri provision for this information • Miscell<aneOr.rs Information The system made no provisioris for the var^ioi.rs data Olements Outlined in this ser:tion argil eas this was the specific charge . Other- Of f icer•:a (w oc:c:urencus) - No provt t,,ion=; haavo been made for this information by iho 5yste?m The eystU_,nr at the City of Sian AngtOo matte nn provisions for capturing this information. All datci elements outlined in the questionnaire were rni=_e>ing From the City of Sari Angr31o system. The funr_tiOn of maintaining birth and death records waK not the responsibility of the 57n Angelo Municip<.al Court. INPUT_~L.,CI1PjENTQ ,T'Ci_MUNIrlff"AL_CQU[~T,_5Y , C.M: All _ourr.c docc.imentS outlined in caur- clur:!stionmm.rP cnulcl processed by the City of San Angelo tem car Ole pre~posud p<aricing sy~ tcrm, col' TE,_r1_CFl[OnJ' ,1_TIrS, E;>_•5er__ti on: The City of Sian Angelo Syrti~m supparted all of the requirem ntt. in this section with the following e;;ceptions: The San Angelo wyutem harJ r; r7 provision for di=;tinquieiiiir7g ihe agency issuing t!-10 eitaticin The sy>tom di d not crosb referuncr_ ogency and va.l idL to ark -nc.y mi nce no 7 enc,y capabi. l i ty wos prnvi Ld While ca11 input docr,rmontr•~ could be vntf-red vi,--.x Lermini.!l no valickition a; information wc,s porferrmod sat the ti•mo of inputing but rrather ,at they t0vc, b--itch prone!:E;ir,g crcr;ur-r-e~d • T1 iv systc5rri hind iici pr'ovisirln 'Lo fiL:COLArIt fcii- tickets tither than IioIdi ng this offi.cer• responEEAL,1L, i'!yo City of 5ran Angcelc3 EyWtam met dace SPecification out Iinced A, n the Ill ty of Denton que! U oiinrai r e' "0' th the, f of 1 a,ui rig c?xco.pt i tans: Thar- cr was not a c.roSs rc-?f cr-enc a f i IQ of cf f i cer- IV hadqu raumb car5 to office- name rand no va11dation of badge nuenbc.,r, rva performed at the time of inputing the citation The dockvt. nu(nhers were not rkot.onit:ically t,.ntvignod by the ZyBl:ern trot ra.thatr thU court clvrkrs assigned the docket numbewi 5. At thi cy time Stan Angelo haF, two dock e-tsa. . The rsy%tom did not print ri-ueipts bLrt: did pr-inl. UpdMo di sprarci ti onsa date paid and amount pal d The vystum could naL vvlectivuly purge information by agcnc) code or- violation codv but dial have the capability to selectively pur-gea by bodge numbpi- The system did not pr•ovidc, for usor help sc:rc-Eons t:o display violation codes and c.;LtUcodra> but: they used a pe, i nt ed shvoi: to rof urenc:e thci r. orroLt violation r_ade The r;ystem did nc?L provide? the capability to r_rac,e reference aliasi bot did have a vvc-y fluxiblce inquiry by violator's name Thrc? City of San Angela System met the rcequi.r-ement43 aistlinod in our cioestionnrai r-o with the following ercoptions: Tic: Let IqumbCr This nt.unbcer we{s the e;amc~ as the docket ne.embc r s, inquiry capability way not: provided Vi.alrator-'r;-ilia Violator's race inquiry caprabil.ity wae, riot provided Vi ol.ator'a Sex inquiry cap<ahiIity v,rras [lot pr- ovi d(-,d Driver•"e LA cen ca Number inc,uiry ccapability eras riot pr-cvi deed . Verrie.lu 11? ineic.t 'y e,+r-s ncrt praviClUd. r but woulci her r:•vai liable on the pr opos,ead perr- kinu L ick:e t =,yst.cem The City of San Angelo Sytitem did riot di spl :Ay the individual citation information on the terminal but r4therr c..ontAin H115 information on the mi crof i the ;;yst:em. The disposition of the citation is displayed uparl the terminals. The City of San Angelo system has an excellent inquiry by violator's name?, date of birth, driver's licensw or any combination of thv5o three items. The ssystom did not provide the capability to perform ingUiry by state, race or sea; and themr~ itom~5 seem to be more appropriately the major selection criteria for a printed report. The City of Sesn Angel o' s abj r;cti vc. wz: i to retain two years of dispossed case+s on thE~ syste:mc but at the time, of our visit had purged the history filN of disposed cases twice since Qctobvr, 1983 due to dish sipaco avai lzibi l i.ty. Currently the, City of Stan Angolo is pla7nning on doubling its dial: space c.iipabi l i ty. BE Ej QB! P: We did not oxamine this section in the det„iil we did the other sec:tions: but rather we had the? City of San Angelo review their reports Arid the uac-~ of the reports. It did not appear that. t: )'1 e? 5y=_.tc±m 14ass I ach:i ng in the report dr oo Lis, outlined in cww queStionnairce. n r, r f L~CE551 hIG_h:E QU l RE MEMT5: The City of San AngC91 0 Sy~Aenr runs on an I . E;. M. f:;yv;tem Sri LASing a supervivor versus an I.D.M. il'XX computer using C1f]'ISA)3E operating system. The on-lirie? portion of the system does not opePr-atel under- CICS. As ha_; cxlre.ady boon mentioned,, the dncument.Ation of the syrttmm has not been compl.oWd. AI 1. the. batch programs were written in i'PO verSus COBOL. The ow-line programs were wri.ti:en using SDA which is a langll:ge th,it. is unigLAEe to the I.D M. system _511 VOFSL(sa C:ICS command le.nguage?. It is e ~timtrtc?d that conversion effort to thc•: City cf Dunton' s co,nputol Would r ec~t.~i r e appr ox i m.-: tul y of programming effort. Since the system wr,s written by canothe tsto.ff, the annual release of now enhancements, tctchtii cal scipp+or t, us>e+ s.Lippart and user trEAininy Would not bu p; r,,.:&r?nl eas it W(AAd bca with a packrage offorud by a commercial softvj oar o c:umpan)f. MUNICIPAL COUR'T' SYSTEM COS'T'S SYSTEM EQUIPMENT SOFTWARE MODIFICATION TRAINING COSTS COS'T'S COSTS* Bryan (5) 3,000 Termir-.'.s -0- 5,000 750,00 E1 Paso 3,000 't'erminals 2,000 1,000 750.00 San Angeio 1, 38,000 Microfilm 15,000 -0- 750,00 (10-15 Persons) 52,000 System 34 21000 3,000 'T'erminals 2. 38,000 Microfilm 15,000 30,000 3,000 Terminals 2,000 * These costs would not be out-of-pocket, costs, but rather costs of current data processing staf;: time to accomplish the modifications. 6/27/84 I t ilgti of t Ile' (i Ly N. .r: 1'Itoll ",I% I V' !il i i)0 ;.,Ir., st the 1i.wr-;da !l:n, 1-I~ .r.-Lit I, l . I~., hi el it l' C,',rrs Presellt: C;,rv ioilills Plly.lIIS ~1011-16 of the City Staff 1, The meeting was called to order by Gerald Cardwell and the minutes of July 2141 1984 meeting were considered, ']'here being no I1C'i'Ced the ,7lnutes wore approv'?d o1lanilnol:Sl.\• SS i:;,ry l:rl?i.. ; d to the Board 'fires 1011,:i,fI,ii,ll fbl' LIIC T:-'.s CCrI,e' tC 'I-Vi,i C. cr„! ?:5 ti' t is C! L. 'of i:..'n oll r !iC , j. V j, 1 , p".iCt!', ( II (,`1 II. ~t;r1 "+I t I'.1C it 'e C'o to agree, alts a,( C ii nt,:,iec ',<l,a;I t`c l .r.`tlr,irC ;ack:iEe PUi'C }:L3$e rl C'l"iS C'l:S 1. i're ,.;!de a ❑totion to recornmcrnd that the City C.f Il,.r,t.n;'s ::ppreve this o-;ai.llt ra;C• agreement, Mr, Pay Pittman sCCL'llded 1.lif snot ion and the motion tray passed unanimously, 3, Cary Collins presented the Board with findings of the trips to the Cities of Bryan, Te),as; Fl Paso, Texas and San Angelo, Texas to view the respective Municipal Court Systom, Cary Collins explained that a second trip to E1 Paso was necessary since on the first visit the system was being operated in a test mode in the Data F'rolcs~i.ng Department and nt that time serious procedural problems had not been resolved, In early October a second site visit to Ul Paso \,,is made and the system WLS mewed in a operational mode in the court: clerks environment, Gary Collins explained that the resolution of problems in the 5 months from the first visit were very apparent and the El Paso system provided the maximum number of functional options of all three systems, Cary Collins discussed with the Board the major differences between the tir_-ee systems and the foat-ures that attracted us to the City of f;l Passo's system, i i i P 1YI I LS Mo11 %v11.h 1'1 l.; l1'd l..i, {._114"1 nu-L t.,m, i.?.1 T;,.:'p ilr;lt t11r~ I..dk l,RI;E H'll'I fttillg .171d (1iri.r 7I,k- n.~1IId;I i(-11 10 1.11e laity ComI 1I at t11C IL11 WO Il: tt sihn. (;a rco 1.11118 pro' wilted to lilt.' Ird 1ho "i:1-1`It7' I\' P 01) for the 1)a(a I'ro 1113,1111 t I' wil t. it .HS t%'14 f18I) W'iS it i.'. V 01OJ1 I'd 10 CiTjjhIV- W1t.I a fCUlll t11 Mid wmild be forwcirk-d ftrr (~s.'•II' i-W "iid lt.ll~17A1 t\', it ll:iS PRplainird that: 1.11is p].+n woI1-1d '.lt:. ill. ~ I ,it.r-d in the 1'inl~rgt~r,cy Pi,an Z', ra}Y'nt NO slon I s cv--rmll CIIv' Lait'l' Il'!,,, t--.r pIi411s. Mr. Dale Maddry observed ihilt the plcin rn',ls for the City of DIyall to act as a backup s.itc and that an (-it of [clan t-,'icku'p aile is I1sed the, eonunurticat ions and people riL'Vk u:rit prcblcnls rare greatly increased. Mr, Dalee Mlidrlry scfit,r'sted the City of b,rrtun attempt to seek a backup site in Dent oil for emergency 111'ocessing on a limited basis, Cary Collins responded he would cbecl:iaitll the nthel• IBM computer sites in Denton to aee if some kind of dgreement for emergency proce:7sing would be feasible, fhet'e toeing no furt.Let' bl7alnl ss the nieet.ing was ad~o7r,r,1?, r I 30 MY01DENrON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 Office of the City Manager M E M O R A N D U M T0; G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE; November 15, 1984 SUBJECT; Letter From Jack McCall, 3M Sales Representative It is disturbing that Mr, McCall of t;,e 3M Company Continues to criticize our bid process in the recent purchase of a library theft detection system, Had Mr, McCall spent as much time in • accommodating the questions of Mrs. Orr prior to the purchase of Lite system, I feel that much of this issue would have moon resolved before the award of the bid. In a conversation iJith Mr, McCall prior to receipt of the bids, a conversation in which Mrs. Orr described Nr, MCCal IIs be,►avior as very rude, sire made every attempt to obtain from Mr. McCall names of installations of n i s product, She indicated to aim ner willingness t0 contact and, if time permitted, to visit taose installations so that site could see .auw ais product operateu. Rather tnan supply her with that informatioit1 1411 ich was a specific part of tlae bid specification, he continued to take issue with stow tale bid specifications were written, Prior to the meeting, both Tom Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent, and Councilmember Ray Stephens informed Mr. McCall of the procedure for taking an item off the consent agenda so that fie might nave an opportunity to address the City Council with his concerns, He was present during the meeting and did not make such a request. G Clir i s Hartung November 15,`1984 Page Two Because of the possibility of a controversy over this issue, I had asked Joella Orr to be presec►t during this portion of the Council meeting to responu to any questions Mr, McCa?.1 might have presented. Unfortunately, lae caose not to rresent them at ti►e opportune momvit--before a docision was made by the City Council, However, even after the doe ision was mado, Joel Ia Orr, Tom Snaw, Ray Steptens, and I met with Mr, McCall in order to make sure ne understuod wait had taken place, Ho did understand that a final decision had been made, but continued to argue about the bit specification per so, rather than present information that would prove tite superiority of Ills product, In fact, Dirs. Orr asked Lim again for names of installations that site might contact. He again evaded the question and acted as though sue should accept the reputation of cis product on its face, lie has tiever'to this date provided bier with the name of a location wt►ere his product ltas 4een installed. We consider this evasive ana uncooperative attitude to be the opposite of i4i►at we would expect of a salesperson of t;ie 3NI Company, His abrupt response to Mrs, Orr that evening was that if she installed the :M product and did not like it, it had a money-bar.K guarantee. 1 explained to him that Mrs. Orr simply could not afford to experiment to "see" if a product would work trithout prior checking, Although lie indicated that his product was choaper, we aaa incomplete information with wnich to make any decision other than the one that had been made. He seemed to present an attitude tiiat the name of uis product should carry enough weight that lie sltouidn't have to prove to Mrs. Orr teat ►iis product Would tirorx Weil in uer library setup, Rarely Piave we seen such arrogance in a salesperson, whose typical roic should be to "soil" ills product and w.,o ►cormaily provides more information than we could possibly digest, liven if tile '15M product were the best One an tiie marKet, N1rs, Orr and the Purctcasing Department can only make a decision based on the data presented, I believe both Mrs. Orr and the Purchasing Department handled this item according r,o peocedure and every effort was macie to provide Mr, McCall with the Information necessary to make a comparison to other uios. Nrs. Orr's October 232 1984, memorandum, wnich was subaitted to the City Council along with ,ier bid, itemizes those areas where there is a variance from the uid specification. Mr. IdcGall might ;cave responded to those specific areas, G. Chris Hartungg November. 15, 1984 Page Three Both Tom Shaw and Joella Orr will be resent at the meeting to respond to questions of the City Council, I lave also attached memos relating to this issuo. e c can Assistant City Manager I j Attacaments 2002NI MVIM RANAUM TOs John Marshall Purchasing Agent FNOMi Joella Orr, Library Director SUM Bid on Seourity System DATEi October 23, 1984 The two bids received for a Library Theft Detection Syst,n have been reviewed. While the 3M System is somewhat lower with it's bid than Checkpoint, it is felt the Checkpoint System is the best and only choice, 3M is new in the area of a radio frequency system ano has not proven it's system to be reliable. The only known library in Texas to have 3M's radio frequency oystem is the Orange Public Library, Acoording to the information received from the Orange Public Library I found 3M way not able to meet the contract deadline and it was only under pressure that the Orange Public Library was able to get the system installed and the needed supplies, (The system was ordered in April and it wasn't 'until Oat, 1, that the system was in operation) It is felt that the Denton Public Library cannot afford to install a system that does not have proven realiability, Listed below are specific points that the 3M system does not offer that were required in the bid specifioationsi 1. Omission of #3 in the Instructions to Bidders, 24 No descriptive data on the operation of the system was included. 3. The 3M System is not CPMK III or approved equal. 4. 3M does not Specify if its system has an audible alarm which activates a visual alarm. 5. The 3M System has only a single Sensing Antenna, not the two (2) as specified in the bid requirements, 6• 3M does not meet the requirements of three (3) sensing antennas. 7. 3M does not state that its system would detect items carried at-any angle. 9. 3M does not meet the Operator's Control Module speoifioabions. 9, 3M did not state if detection pieces are available with printed information. 10. 3M did not send a list of 12 libraries using their system for 2 years. It is my recommendation that the Th~q t Detection System selected for installation be the one submitted by Checkpoint. t Joell r, Library Director dw 0161h 30 c l~rnton pxbl~c .C`tbra~'~ 602 OAKLAND DLNTON, TEXAS 76701 ti MEMORANDUM JOELLA ORA, oiRkoton TO$ BETTY MoKEAN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER PROM; JOELLA OAR, LYBRARY DIRECTOR SUEJs ACTIONS OF 3M COMPANY SALESMAN DATEi November 14, 198 The letter from Jaok M6Call to' the City Counoil is interesting, but S am puzzled`as to its purpose, It is possible that Mr. M60all has; never dealt with a governmental agenoy before. He reoeived oomplete information about the.prooedo"S to be followed= he ohose not to follow them:and then seemed angry that he' did not get the order, For instanoe, Mr. MgCal'1 was upset With the bid speoi.fioations even though they inoluded an "or approved equal" ;staterdent.. This statement was explatm6d verbally by Tom Shaw and myself, to.Mr.'MoCall by telephone. Our bid request for speoifio' information oonoerning radio frequenoy deteotion systom installations ourrently, in operation by 3M was ignored. I requested the same information when Mr. MoCall oalled to ask me why 3M did not get the bid. I still don't have this information. Mr. MoCall was informed by Tom Shaw that the bid was on the oonsent agenda and that he oould oontaot our City Manager to have it removed from that part of the agenda so that it ooul.d be disou'ssed. Mr. MoCall did oome to the Counail meeting, but made no attempt to follow this proosduret It is Mr. MoCall's business to know that printed labels required to do a retrospeotive conversion are arose expensive than the labels required for new materials, 3M, is a respectable oompany. I believe that they will have a good radio frequenoy, detection syptero._ At this time, however, I have no knowledge of suoh an instal.iation'$ and Mr. MoCall wag not willing to supply us with this 'lpformatian'as per our bid request. Joel2 rr, Librar.,D rector G4PGH 1 ~lA 1, n~~' Tel. ~r•~. WrY ED of DENTON, MXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 5668200 MEMORANDUM TO: Joella Orr FROM, Tom D. Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent DATE: November 13, 1984 SUBJECT; Proprietary Specifications The City of Denton has on numerous occasions resorted to the use of proprietary specifications for acquisition of highly technical or specialized equipment, The use of specifications from a specific vendor as identification for a product or system is used extensively throughout the purchasing profession. All specifications of this type include the "or approved equal" statement. We reserve the right to evaluate all bids regardless of their compliance with specifications. It is also our right and responsibility to determine wh;,t is or is not an approved equal. We are the approving agency. What may be considered equal and approved in one area does not mean that it is an approved equal in all areas. We do not have the expertise nor the responsibility to develop totally generic specifications for all request for bids. We do, however, have a very definite responsibility to evaluate all responses to our bid request based on the terms and conditions of the bid package as well as compliance with the intent of the specifications. Above all else it is our intent, duty and profession to acquire the best possible product or system that will do the Job required for the dollars spent. Tom D, Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent PURCHASING DEPARTMENT DIPW METRO 267.0042 o City council Kinutee 10 September 4, 194e Y" The Council convened into a work session at Soo p a. on Tuesday, Sepptember 1, 1981 in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Buildtnq, MZKBERs PRESICNTs Mayor Btewarti Mayor Pro Tam Chewi Council Members Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlespergec and Stephens city Managec, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ABSENT; None 1. The Council held a discussion on funding of Flow Hospital. City Manager Chrie Hartung repocted that this item was placed on the agenda at the request of the Ci'vy council and the Flow Hospital Board of Directors. Mo. Mary Williams, Chairperson of the Flow Hospital Board of Directors, reported that as of July 31, the hospital was operating in the black and expressed thanks from the board for the support which had been received Crom the City Council. Mo. Williams further ceported that there the proposed budget would contain a list of capital items. 'rho executive medical eommLttee had been reviewing the list and making revisions. A meeting had been held eactiec in the day with Integrated Health Resources in Dallas, One of the plans discussed would provide a vehicle by which the new office building could be financed. Flow Hospital could borrow the funds necessary by pledging the coal propecty as security. These partieulac funds would only be available until December 11 and application fot the program had to be made within the next 11 days. The monieo could be borrowed at 55% of the prime interest rate and the funds could be Invested until © they were required for the building program. Jeff Hausler, Administrator of Flow Hospital, stated that Integrated Health Resources was selling bonds and the hospital. needed to let them know as quickly as possible if Flow wanted to participate. Me. Williams added that the physician's office building was aeoessary for the success of the hospital, Flow would also require financial support in an approximate amount of 11250,000 Ccom the council to assist in replacing the old capital equipment. nr. Don Holt, Board member, stated that the doctors were confused and needed a vote of confidence from the owners of the hospital, The doctors wanted to know it the Council w,xnted them to be at Flow; many Waco concerned about the negative attitude between the City and the County. There was much at stake and Denton could lose the only non-profit hospital in town. Dr. Holt stated that he Colt the entire issue hinged on the owners, the City and County, getting together, Me. Ralph Hawkins, representing Harwood K, Smith and partners architects, reported that his firm was involved with the mastec planning tog Flow and stated that there was a concern regarding First Texas Medical's certificate being granted in Austin and what that would mean to Flow Hospital. The impact would be felt in recruiting physicians, Flow was in dire need of a professional office building for doctors. Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the basic issue was the office building. Mr. Hawkins responded that during the mastec plan process ass . aspects of the hospital were being reviewed, such as who came to Flow, who good out of the County for medical servtoee, eta, The office building vas only one aepect of the overall m&dtcr plan. Also being considered were psychiatric and nursing home services. Cit+yy counotl Minutes` 194 Meetlnq of september 40 Page Two tspoCt addra 4 tow much publto support for Plow Would be r queired, wound Me. Hawkins replied that this would be addressed It it became a program. ditfer~ont. ember hospitals lint he arressand theaamount tof comm was available on unity support, Me, Hawkins stated that there were many small hospitals in the area, His Clem hoped to get more community support and be in a position to after total health care services. His firm had worked with many City/County hospitals and it seemed there was always Crtotion. Some of these hospitals had gone to management contracts. Me, William Parisi, tntograted Health Resources, stated that his firm had a regional finanotal pool program which would allow the the amortization loans F1 w over efurto 30 nish themrswithtnaeQ tal oHealth hospltal,s ou%ulative needs. ouncil, MO ba sEor ger asked how much money did Mc. Parisi Flow, feel could be Mr. Parisi responded that the bottom of the well was called credit, The bonds wopuld be rated by Moody or standard and Poore and might also require a letter of credit, The land on. which the hospital was located would subordinated, His tneeded acknowledgement the Couinallnd would come back to the Council with aresolution authorizing Flow hospital to enter Into the pool, Council Member Stephen asked when could the doctor's office building be operational. Mr. Parisi responded that the money would be in the pool in November. officewbuilding coulda be occupied by October or November of, Council Member Stephens asked who would recruit the physicians. hospital admint tratlond be a Joint effort Me, Hawkins s Clem and he that the toccOtment between his Council Member Stephens asked which would bo accomplished Cleat - tLe construction of the building or the recruitment of the physicians. Hawkins responded that the doctors would be rocruited first as much as possible, touhencil be Riddleaparger tot the acurrentfyethe ar or5an0on-g inglneedt from Me, Williams replied that it took capital to run Flaw and the present need was self-sufficient. $250,000 or more. The hospital wanted to become self ars and at the hospital had gotten Into a hole over the Dr. Holt last few ye was trying to dig out, Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that Flow was eeoking a commitment from the City tot $250,000 this year. Regardless of °~hat the County did, the City Council was willing to do whatever it took to make Flow hospital a viable institution. Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council needed to send out signals to the community that the City budget was not finalized, There was a commitment to the hospital and that commitment should be considered as part of the budget process, , City 06onOtt Mtnutoe Hooting of September 4, 1944 Page Three MayOr Stewart stated that the Council needed to set another budget hearing. . It was the consensus of the Council to snogUCAgs the oonetructlon of the doctors building and to ekptore all avenues for funding. 2. The Council hold a discussion on a proposed 112.7 aoce mobile hone subdivision In the extra territorial jurisdiction iapptoxlzately 9700 toot east of Loop 288 on Highway 426) for the purpose of detecmintnq whether or not to begin the annexation prooeee. Jeff 1leyyer, Director of Planning and Community Development, reported that Me Item had changed, The Planning and Community Development Depactment had been approached by developers who wanted to pay for water and sewer line extension, Staff was now looking at a very large annexation in the future and this particular area would be a portion of that larger area, There was a poestbility of an annexation of approxteately 2,000 acres and 5,000 people. Representatives from the developer were present and stated to the Council that this pacoel was presently under, contract for sale and wanted some type of indication of the Counzil's thoughts regarding annexation proasedings. it was the consensus of the council Lo proceed with the annexation of the 11247 aor$ tract and the larger parcel it ar.d when development was proposed. The Council convened into the Executive Session to consider legal mattecs, real estate, personnel, and board appointments, No official action was taken. The Council then oonvened into the Regular meeting at 7100 p,m. in the Council Chambers. • MNIMBRRS PRESENT BENTt MayoC Stewart; Mayor Pro TAro Chewl Council Members Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary MEMBERS ktISENT, None 1, The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the Regular meeting of May 1, 1984; the Regular meeting of May 22, 1954; the Regular meeting of June 5, 1984; the special Called meeting of June 8, 1984; and the Regular meeting of June 19, 1984. Council Member Stephens stated that on page 7 of the ;Minutes of the June 19 meeting, most of the discussion had dealt with whether or not to approve 240 apartments in the Dimension Development petition as was recommended by the Planning and zoning Commission or to approve 390 units as was presented In the original petition for the planned development. The mayor discussion had related to the density. Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the Minutes with the exception of the Minutes of June 14, 1984 which should be expanded and brought back for approval, Motion carried unanimously, 2. Consent Agenda McAdams motion, Alford second to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, Motion carried unanimously, 77, ~77~ a'4x Ga~'i►n k Nl~n~i;ee NeeBlnq o q ep 6009 4, 1991 P+gN Four Consent Agenda: A. Kidd and Purchase Orders: • 1, Bid 4 9316 - Bentonite slurry cutoff wall 2. Old M 9316 - Tratfio poles, Signal lights, eto. 3. Bid N 9319 - Meter maintenance 4. Biel k 9320 - Hydraullo auger 5, aid N 9321 - Padlooks 6. Bid M 9322 infrared viewer 7. Bid N 9324 - Vacuum Pump S. Bid M 9325 - Soft drinks and vending machines 9. Bid M 9326 - Sale of transformer - damaged in fire 10. Bid M 9327 - Transformer ratiometer 11, Bid N 9329 - Janitorial services 12. Bid M 9331 - Utility poles 13. Purchase Order M 63913 to general Electric Comm any, Apparatus Service Division in the amount of 113,111.63. 14, purchase Order R 64685 to Denton Electric Shop, inc. in the amount of $3,583.26. 15, Purchase order 0 64726 to Newman Engineering Equipment, tno, in the amount of $3,512,17, 16. Purchase order M 64753 to ONEAC Corporation in the amount of $4,143,00, B. Contracts: 1. Consider approval of a contract with Padgett-Thompeon for presentation of seminar retarding the legal aspects of hiring and firing, seminar to be given to all City supervisory personnel, Cost will be approximately $6,000 depending upon number of participants. 0. Plate and Replata: 1. Consider approval of the f.Lnal replat of lot 29, Section 11, of the Solar Way Addition. (The Planning and zoning commission r.ecomtands approval.) 2 Consider approval of the preliminary and final replat of the Krause Addition, (The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval.) 3. Consider approval of the preliminary plat of the Frame Street Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Jay-Mar Addition. (The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval.) • Qitaounail Minutes Maeinq "of September 4, 1904 Page F1Y• 5. Consider approvI al of the preliminapy raplat of the W*Otridae Addition, (The Planning and Zoning commission ceoommends approval.) 6. consider approval of the Prallmiaary plat of block 1 of the Woodoreek Addition, (The Planning and zoning Comatuslon recommends approval.) 7, consider aapproval of a site plan fur unit block 2, of the Fallmeadow Addition (PD-8), (The Planning and zoning commission recommends approval.) 8. Consider approval of the final replat oe the Denton Retirement Center Addition, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 31 The Council recognized a representatives of the young People in Action appearing to express appreciation to the City Council for their support. Kc, Ponald Cox, Apoftsor of the Young People in Action, appeared and thanXed the Council for the proclamation which had been issued to the -groupp and for the support which had been given to the organization, The members had gained a lot from the proclamation and were pleased to receive it, 4. Public Hastings A. The council held a public hearing on the petition of Curtis D, Hodgson, representing RW(1P, Inc., requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) classification to the planned . development (PD) classification on a 66,5 acre tract located at the southwest corner of Paige Road and Swisher Road. If approved, the planned development would permit a 413 lot manufactured housing subdivision, Z_1672 The Mayor opened the public hearing, Me. Connie Cole, from Lakewood Estates, spoke in favor of the petition stating that she believed the mobile home induetry was chan)ing. When in-place and landscaped manufactured housing offered a nice alternative and she would like to see It approved. There was a need for affordable housing for young people and older retired citizens. Mr. Curtis Hodgson, the petitioner, spoke in favor stating that ROLLingwood Estates was his idol. It was a 66.5 acre tract which would be highly restrictive. TKAcc would be 6,2 lots per acre and deed restrictions would prohibit any mobile homes with metal siding. The units would have to be owner occupied and tied down. Wheels and axele would be removed, The lots would be priced at approximately $10,000, Mr. Hodgson then stated that he had chosen Denton as the location because it was near to his own home and felt there was a demand for this type development in this area, Curbs and gutters would be included as well as any drainage improvements where required, Mr. Hodgson would extend the water and sewer lines to the development, This would be a subdivision and not a park because there would be no rentals. All rules and restrictions would be enforced by a neighborhood association. All units would have attached concrete foundations, The neighborhood association would eleet'3 people to serve 2 year terms on a member board, Articles and by laws would make It clearly the responsi- bility of this board to enforce the rules. . The devalopment would be a lad density, residential area with city water and rawer service, The perimeter toads Would be paved and arty Council Minute Meeting of September 41 1904 P416 Six natural' gee from GOSH Star' gas would be available. The only problem etpm fCOm th' fact tRollingwood with the development seemed to manutaotureu housing which had a "trailer perk" stigma. Etates imits, would Mr. Hodgson then statedtthatd heeW uld be happy etot provide l imply, thate them/adJacentt ateadwa scent landenus4l and hutfigtnq this between higher land use, He had spent hours in other mobile home parks In the area and had seen. the Ceeidents wotkinq in yacdo which they rented, to the Sollingwood development, the residents would Own the who p needed it plaul at sc al children, housing tot the less afflusnt Me. Kathleen doldetein spoke in favor stated that she and hoc husband would soon be Dukahaaing a home but believed that some she believedntheree was ta builtahomea, housing She concluded byrstaCing better thatconstructed real need for this type development, Mr, Harold Stafford, resident of Denton West mobile home yank, spoke i,k favor stating that he had lived in a mobile home tot 1,0 years and that the Lakewood 'states and Twin Lakes parka were examples of what w46 possible. The idea of the subdivision was that the residents could home would not becometalalumsareaeas stated nIn ahrecentenewspaper article. Ms. Charlotte Zimsurman4, vice-President of the Texan Manufactured Housing Aaaooiation, Spoke In favor stating that manufactured housing had doiee into its own, The Industry was the most highly the nded representedialA segmentstof the popurlati on In.the community, they Mr. W. P. att nt, stating thatPthelisite wasoanVeryoinsulatedp&Cos. De dOrestrictions which would be placed on the development included; 1, eauh resident would receive the deed to their lot 2. any dwelling must have 9,000 square test of living apace 3. the total area covero3 by the dwelling would not exceed 40% of the lot 4, the lot must be landscaped 51 there would be no renting 6, all dwellings would be kept In good repair Mr. Phillips stated that these were very restrictive and would be for their services. who were elected dfor y2 year etstvJaanddwereassociation Mr. Brian Burke, engineer for the petitioner, spoke in favor stating for drainage and the developer was that a work with all guidelines. willing Mr, Chuck Helton spoke Ia favor stating that he was In the manufactured development, The housing housing w Indthis ustry Would been upgraded over the last few years, he felt the manufactured indication of housing the firm, Mr. Mike stating as that representing favor n of manufactured housing should be expanded as it was very restrictive, months cmanufactured siut was financed on rather, Affordable t paymente, Now it was not low cost b housing through conventional financing which was amortized and not just shadow loans. it% Lewisville thatB he t had Singleton, developed e spoke in favor . and had experienced approximately a 2 1/2 ticks faster till rate than arty council Minutes meeting of 04ptamw 4, 1104 Page seven was •x acted, khothet 200 spaces was develop4d at the 44140 tilkA and the (III Cate WAS 24 pet month, or also 2 l/Z times C6041 that) WAN expected, A4pcoXtUtelY 750 new mobile homes had been placed in Denton county during the last year. Mr, B, Whitney, resident of Denton West mobile home park, spoke in O voc stating that the cent for Iota at the pack had been increased 17% during the last year and he did not know any other housing which had appreciated that much. He would like to own his own land so that these large increases In land cent would not affect him, Me, John Russstl, resident of Chaparral Estates, spoke in opposition stating that letters had boon mailed to the city council togatdinq the concerns residents had about this development, The Planning and Zoning commission had seemingly disregarded their arguments but the isoues were still there and deserved the attention of the Council, Me, Russell stated that he lived accost the attest fcom the proposed development and had watched problems with dcatnage during heavy rains, Mr. Burke had said that his engineering firm had looked at Cho 25 year flood plani Mr, Russell stated they should have looked at the 100 year flood plan, The oteeks should be left alone and not concreted in, The developer was pcoposing to build too close to the railroad tracks. In the future if there was rapid transit, the railroad tcacka would be the logical route, Mr. Russell further stated that he would not address the issue of density and Impact on traffic or the schools, but problems did exist, Me, Russell then stated that he did not understand what type of govacnmeat would not listen to oltlsens who objected, The Planning and Zonlnq Commission and the planning staff did not pay attention to the concerns and objections of the residents of Chapaccel Estates. He believed this would be creating a future slum area and as land would appreciate In value, the owners would let leases expiro and than sell, The Council needed to consider If another mobile ''home park was needed. Representatives from the mobile home industry in Dallas had appeared at this meeting which would Indicate that other cities were refusing these developmedts, Mt, Russell then gave a list of all of the mobile home parks to the southeast Denton area and asked the Council to declare a moratorium on any more manufactured housing parks in southeast Denton so as to eucourage other types of development, Mr, Russell concluded by stating that he had spoken with members of the Chaparral It9tates neighborhood and the residents would bb willing to disannex from shady Shores and be annexed by the City of Denton, Ms, Judith 0ctmes spoke in opposition stating that she had recently leoved from Lewisville primarily due to the mobile home situation there, Her only objections were density related problems, such as traffic, and the potential for crowded schools. Me, arimee also questioned how deed restrictions could effectively be enforced and asked if the issue of repossession had been considered, she concluded by stating that her objections were Increased traffic, the possibility of creating a burden on the schools due to the large influx of residents In the mobile home pack, Mr, Well Sneidee spoke in opposition stating hat he lived at the pig farm across the street and felt the density of a mobile home park would Vote a problem, Mr, Richard Green spoke In opposition stating that he had lived in Shady shores for a year and felt this particular development wo1.ld remove the country atmosphere, Mr. Orson further stated that the mobile home pack homeowners association could not control the standards established by Me, Hogsdon and the tendency would be for the development to degrade. Mr, Morris Pearson of Chaparral Estates npoke in opposition stating that the mayor problem he had with the development was the location and the incompatibility with the neighborhood, There Waco four City noµn0ii Minyt;"1N MeetltlI of Septvaber 4, 1994 Page aght orite'tto far zoning changes which had been eetabltahed by the sueeeme court, one Oil Which Stated that 'toning could not negatively atteot eurtounding 01ghbothoode. Arnother concern vat the tcatftc. Me, Hoqs4on was pcoposlnq a 11000 slot parking lots did this mean there would be 1,000 More vehtcles? Mr, Pearson stated that he did not believe this was low density, He was also cons rued about a decline in the neighborhood and property values, There already existed tratflo congestton at the Shady Shot$$ exit from IH-35. Mr, Pearson also felt the development would be detrimental to the environment as trees would have to be destroyed. He stated the approval of this zoning would set a precedent for the rematning vacant area and would encourage mote mobile home packs, Mr, Peacson stated that if this petition had been submitted tot land across from Township It or Southctdge, It would be denied and asked the Council for the same consideration. He believed there were long range effects to be considered, There was, however, room for oompromtee and was not naive enough to believe that this pcop~,.ty would not be developed, He would work with Mr. Hogsdon and the k-,4ighborhood was willing to consider single tautly, duplexes or triplexes, Council Member Hopkins, asked Me. Pearson to locate his home on the aerial photogCaph provided, Council Msmboc Stephens asked Mr. Pearson to elaborate on the oompromtes. Me, Pearson stated that he could only speak tot himself but a buffer of compatible single tautly housing on Swisher Road would be acceptable. Council Memboc Stephens asked how many rows of single family houses was Me, Peareon suggesting. Me, Pearson stated one row would be sufficient. Mo, Joy Powell spoke in opposition stating that s4veral residents on Swisher and Paige Road, not just Chaparral Estates, were against the mobile home park, She then asked the City Council to think of the community and the citizens first and not the devslof;r from out of town. Mr. Devon Kruger spoke in opposition stating that Shady Shores and Chaparral Estates realized that the property would be developed but did not Want a mobile home park. The residents were not opposed to condominiums, etc, but mobile homes had no resale value. You could not give them away. Ms. Della Robinson spoke In opposition stating that she had moved to this area three weeks ago and would not have bought a home at this location it she had been aware of the petition for the mobile home park, Mr, Morrie Kitchen of Hidden Valley spoke in opposition stating that the surrounding neighborhoods supported the Chaparral Estates position, The overall objection was density. Most residents had moved to this particular area for the rural atmosphere and had a vested financial interest in their homes. Ms. Lynn Snyder appeared in opposition and asked those people in the audience in opposition to stand. The Mayor allowed Mr. Hogsdon time for rebuttal. Mr. Hogsdon stated that the statement that mobile homcc vould decrease the property value was not true and asked it anyone had seen a decrease in value of property between Denton and Lewisville, This development would increase trio value. On the issue of over- crowding of schools, the pressure was always on the schools and if the property were developed at all, it would add students. The Cit NuW l Minutes , Not myy of 9optember 4, 1964 Page' Nlne potential trottio ptobleioalways came up. tf a problem did develop, he would widen 9hldy dhotctf road. M droosiny the concern over the Integrity of the d/v,alopmint, Mr. H496don stated that he was basing his reputation on this development and Celt that the control by the neighborhood association w i the beat that could be done. M tntelntnq a country life style was a `diloona but he would retain every tree that he could, On the issue of density, Mr. Hogedon stated that Lakewood Estates had not experienced any problems. Council Member Riddlesporger stated that one qu6ttion had been that, it developed as a mobile home park, the land would be worth $80,000 per acre and asked why Mr. Hogedon did not develop single family houeing. Mr. Hoqsdon responded that, he wa.e a businessman. No one had been able to make a profit and follow the City of Denton subdivision rules and requlat.ione, Council Member Hopkins asked it Mr. Hoqsdon was familiar with the amount of development and construction in this particular area during the last year. Mkt, Hogedon replied that he could count on one hand the number of houses which had been constructed near his property in the last year, He did not t6e1 he could develop single family housing on the property and make a profit. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Dania* Spivey, Uevelopaent Review Planner, reported that 15 reply forgs had been mailed with 0 returned in favor and 10 returned in opposition, This was outside the criteria area for the Denton Development Guide and was a mobile home subdivision with lots which would be owner occupied, The development would fall under the subdivision rules and regulations with lot sizes to be a minimum of 5,000 squats, feet and a density. of 6 to 7 per acre. Mobile homes were considered a form of divereified housing, The staff's primary concern wai the overwhelming majority of mobile homes being concentrated in this quadrant of the city. The Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the petition by a vote of 4 to 3 with 3 conditions, Mayor Stewart asked It steps were being taken to alleviate flooding. Spivey replied that all drainage and run-off problems created by the development would be handled during the platting process, Mayor Stewart asked if it was true that there was a proliferation of mobile homes in this area, Spivey responded yes, Council Member Stephens stated that it had been suggested that a nomptomias might be reacted between the petitioner and the neighborhood if some type of buffering was included in the plan. In the past, some adjustments to the original petition had been made from the floor and asked the City Attorney If the Council could vota on an ordinance with the uadecatanding that these adjustments would be Included, Acting City Attorney Joe Morris stated thAr. the zoning ordinance provided a method for the creation of a planned develop%rAnt ordinance. The zoning ordinance requires that any planned develo ment ordinance shall have a site plan which s approved with the ordinance. The came procedures In creating a planned development district were followed in any other zoning change. On the question of changing the conditions in the planned development ordinance, the Counull could change the conditions as recoansended by the P&Z as long as they are not substantial, This should be done on city council' Minutes Meeting of September 1, 1901 Paq• Ten a case by vase basis, The purpose of giving notlee of public h+•gtngs was to allow citizens to voice support or opposition to the petition before P&Z and the Council. It the Council made a substantial change attar the P&Z has made its reoommendation, the citizens who has attended the P&Z public hearing may not know of, that change and may not have an opportunity to voice their not i changeto the s such Council. m i as n fencing, etc.~a could use be is madnot e by being the o Council from the floor without the petition being referred back through the Planning and Zoning Commission. Council Member Stephens asked it the buffer zone of single tavily housing could be added. Morris responded that a change in the type of housing was a substantial change, Mayor Stewart asked If 6 affirmative votes were required to approve the ordinance. Spivey responded no; the propetty contained In the zoning change itself and the property within 200 feet did not constitute 20% and did not require 6 votes, The following ordinance was presented: NO. 81- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONINQ MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE N0. 69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 66.5128 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PAIGE ROAD AND SWISHER ROAD, AND 18 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR A. CHANGE IN ZONINQ CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL 'A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USF DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" CLASSIFICATION AND USE DXStQNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the vedinanee, Council Member Stephens stated that he believed if the ordinance were approved it provide for the buffer zone from the adjoining property, He would prefer to send the petition back through the Planning and Zoning commission and allow the buffer aspect to be worked out. Mayor Stewart stated that he had difficulty with allowing 5,000 square fast lots in the city; the Council had refused zoning petitions with 6,000 square feet Iota, Council Member Hopkins stated that he believed he was correct In that the developer under a planned development zoning could agree himself to offer a buffer of single family housing. Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he did not think the Council had been very successful in dealing with developere In the past who had made informal commitments, It would be very foolish to grant the zoning when the property could then be sold. There are too many "ifs and buts", Mayor Pro Tea Chew stated the Council could approve the concept and pass the revised ordinance at a later tine. • Council Member Stephens asked the City Attorney if it would be in order to table the otdihance or to refer the petitiou back to the P&z. Council Member Rlddlesperger stated that if thought there would be a problem even with the butter. Would someone building a home on Swisher. with a mobile home park in their bi~okyard. city Council Minutes Meeting of September 4, 1984 Page Eleven Council Member McAdams stated that the present petition would have homes Acrose the street while the butter row of single family homes would be immediately Adjacent to the park, To make the buffer would oreate a problem, Council Member stephene stated that there were natural boundaries on Swisher and Paige Road, Mayor Pro Tom Chew withdrew the motion, Council Member McAdams withdrew the second, Acting City Attorney Morrie stated that, in fairness to the developer, specifics should be spelled out for a compromise, Council Member Stephens stated that the topography of the property offered natural buffet zones, Chew motion to table and refer back to the Planning and zoning commission with specific lnetruotione on establishing buffer zones. Council Member Hopkins asked it Mayor Pro Tom Chew meant the PSz determine it a butter zone was possible, This would not be appropriate it a natural butter did not exist, Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to reject, Council Member Riddlesperger stated that Mr. Hogsdon had stated that he would withdraw his petition. This motion would allow him to proceed in that direction, On roll call vote, McAdams "nay," Hopkins "nay," Stephens aye, Alford 'aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew °nay," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion to reject passed 4 to 3 with Council Members McAdams, Hopkins and Mayor Pro Tom Chew oaeting the nay votes. Council Members Riddlesperger and Stephens out. B, The council held a public hearing on the petttion of ,10 $toter requesting an amendment to planned development (Pt)-6) on a 5812 acre tract located on the south side of Colorado Boulevard approximately 1,500 feet northwest of Loop 288. It approved, the PD amendment would permit the following land uses;? 167q Single family detached - 22 lots on 3.8 acres (typical lot site 120' x 451) Single family detached - 106 lots on 34.1 4cree (typical lot size 120' x 80') Cluster housing - 215 units on 18 acres (12 units per acre) Two family - 16 units on 2,3 acres The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr, Crog Edwards, of Fields, Ydwarde and Associates, spoke in favor of the petition stating that his firm had completed a land plan for the area and had met with the neighbors regarding the proposed development and had gone through the nlan with them. Council Members Stephens and Riddlesperger joined the meeting. Mayor Pro Tea Chew joined the meeting. Mr. Edwards stated, that hie firm felt the current land plan was not extremely good and this amendment would address several concerns which the neighborhood had. When the Golden Triangle Mall was cloned, one of the major complaints of the Township tt and Hopkins H111 residents was the traffic passing through their addition to aooeas the mall, The proposed plan would address this issue much bfttev. Another concern of the homeowners was the amount of single family buffer area adjacent to Shen, The amended plan would include city counatl minutes Meeting of September 4, 1984 Page Twelve fairly large aceas of comparable lot size single family restdentlal housing, The green belt area had been increased, The neighborhocd assoaiation would allow some higher density uses adjacent to the mall. Waornt to the apartments aocoss Colorado boulevard and adjaoent to the light industrial zoning to the north of the traot. The overall density had been slightly tnoceased but was placed in a more appropriate area and was buffered from the existing neighbor- hood, The homeowners association had boon very frank regarding their oonoerns, Mr. Hetb Shockey, representing the Township IU Hopkins Hills homeowners assoaiation, spoke in favor of the petition stating the association was giving cautious approval, There was not unanimity in the neighborhood, Some residents were against the petition, primarily duo to the significant increase in density and the impact this would have on tae neighborhood. One of the problems with the densityy increase v.1s the lose of trees which presently provided soceenlag from adj.{.ntnq land uses, Other opposition stemmed from the tact that a reraning was just granted in 1981 and there was th6 opinion among residents that that rezoning should stand. Those in favor concurred that the amendment would provide a significant improvement in traffic in the neighborhood and would at last put an end to the illegal use of Piney Creek Boulevard. In agreeing, the homeowners had asked that 6 items be included in the ordinance: 11 the location of the Hickory Creek behind Phase I be left to provide trees tot screening 2, at least 26% of the dingle family lots be developed withit. 2 years 3, simultaneous development of both single family and higher density usage 4. that San aabriel Drive is not turned into a thoroughfare through Township Ii connecting to Piney Creek 5, landscaping be accomplished on the green belt area 6. deed restrictions required to made development compatible with existing neighborhood The neighborhood association finds the plan acceptable,, the only concern was the density, but the cesidents are willing to accept this to get the improvement in the traffic situation, The primary concern was that this be the last rezoning, Council Member Stephens congratulated Mr. Shocksy and the other members of the association for working out the problems. Mr, Tom Moser, with Henry S. Miller company representing the joint venture which owns the shopping center site at northeast corn,c of IH-35 and San Jacinto, spoke in opposition stating that the City Council had voted tc abandon Piney Creek Boulevard, His company was told that Piney Creek would be quit claimed back to Henry S. Miller. His company had been tryiny for several years to get a reputable soft line department store for this site and had relied upon the faot that Piney Creek would be quit claimed back to them. His organization had chosen not to involve their attorneys as they did want to work with the City of Denton. The city had tten very cooperative in working with Henry S. Millet on the site plan for Mervyne department store, Six months ago, his organization proposed, the Piney Creek abandonment to the P&Z. At that time Henry 3. Miller, the staff and the homeowners 1roup all spoke in favor of the request. At the hearing, Ms. Stocer requested that Piney Creek be considered with her zoning request, On that basis, the P&Z tabled the abandonment cequost so that Piney Creek could be considered in coujunation with me. Storer,s zoning request, Henry S. Miller had proceeded on that basis. The proposed Miller development would include 110 million worth of improvements and generate approximately $15 million in annual sales, This should mean something to the City of Denton, Mervyns.has committed to having -the Denton store open in September of 1985, The toitinq case befors'the Council has been to CttYy Council Minutes moo EIng of deptembor 4, 1964 Page Thirteen Planning and zoning and there had boon no mention of Piney Creek • aoulevard, Mr, Motor Stated that his firm was very close to actual development and he did not know whSah way to go with his plans as they related to Piney Creek. He had been told that If information could be generated tot Pox and Council to make a declston, ircogardleas of what happened to the planned development behind their property, it would be beneficial, A consulting firm had prepared numerous traffic studies of Piney Creek Boulevard, Henry B. Miller would prefer that Piney creek be abandon back to them. The original idea was to close off access through the planned development being pcoposed before the Council. It was not their intent to block access Into the residential development. His Oryanizatton was not proaosing that there not be access from San Jacinto by way of Ptney Creek into the residential development. What they proposed Was abandonment and they would work with the developer behind them to dedicate a private easement from Piney Creek to Mo. Btorec's property, The primary access pclnt was off of Colorado Boulevard and the secondary would be from Ban Jacinto. When the Issue of a 100 toot right-of-way was conceived, a total development was behind their area. With the groan belt now splitting across Ian Gabriel, there was now only 3/4 to 1/2 of what was originally conceived, A 3C to 31 feet road would be more than adequate for any type of multi-family development of the highest density, The first pcet4cenae would be for abandonment and Miller Company would agree to dedicate a private drive for joint access thco%ah the Storer development, At the Planning and toning Commiosion Me. Storer had stated that she wanted to keep a 100 feet boulevard through the area because the felt It would be a good gateway to her development. Mr. Moser stated that he would like to Ads the standards applied equally to his property and Ks. Stocer's development. Henry I, Miller was not in the business of dedicating land to make adjacent property owners developments more attractive, They would dedicate land when it was required for traffic accede to benefit the public. Piney Creek to not being considered with this petition. If the zoning was approved, Henry S. Miller would like to have a condition attaohed which would ineure that the standards for Piney Creek were consistent, Me, Mark (]code, representing Shazo, Sterriek and Tun, spoke In opposition stating that his firm had conducted a number of transportation studies in this area, Henry S. Miller Company had asked his firm to look particularly at Piney Creek Boulevard which was still on the books as a 100 feet right-of-way, four lane divided boulevard connecting San Jacinto to the cluster home portion of the planned development request before the Council. A planned develop- ment should Show things like access, and access to the cluster home area of the proposed development was not defined, He could only assume that in addition to access on Colorado Ms. Starer was counting nn maintaining some type of access to Piney Creek Boulevard. His firm had studied this and a four lane divided boulevard could handle approximately 24,000 card per day. The small portion of cluster homes would only generated several hundred oar trips per day. Henry S. Miller company would like, as a part of this planned development if approved, for the Council to reaffirm that 100 feet of right-of-way arid a four lane divided boulevard is not appropriate at this location. They would like either a reduced right-of-way on Piney Creek Boulevard, whicch would permit a two lane roadway which would be more than adequate to handle the needs of Henry S. Miller company and tits cluster homes; or preferrable, a 30 or 31 test wide access easement which would preserve the access to the clutter homes but allow Miller to develop their property at had been committed several years ago by a previous council, The Henry S. Miller Company would 14*Xo for this Council to reaffirm as pact of the planned development approval that Piney Crook in not appropriate as a 100 feet right-of-way and to make a decision one way or the other to that they could proceed with their nand, O The Mayor allow Md. Storer time for rebuttal. cit~r Caungil Minutea Met tap of September 4, 1904 P490 Fourteen Mt, stoter stated that the Celt the 30 toot tasetsent would not be a st.I oft Ut An alley and did not Ceel that an alley into the Subdivision would be approprtato, on a 30 feet oaesment, Henry 9. Killer gould build tint up to it where as on a 100 toot easement, aonstcudtion would have to be tot bank Z5 toot. She taw no ditNt onos In leaving Tome Veen Space between the 0006eCOtal development and felt it would add to the over4l.1 Mtllsc development. Her development would have an entry from Colorado to cluster housing and would save all of the trees and a loo feet atcoot would be cidtouloue. Council Member Hopkins Stated that she backup material toad that 'Htncy a. Miller Company requested that Piney Creek Boulevard remain olosedi however they had offered to grant to No. Storer a 30 toot private 400454 tatoment through the street, Both Hs, Stocee and the Township It/Hopkino W-Ils Homeowners Association tool that the 3o toot access easement would be an acceptable volution to the problem.,, No. Stater responded no; that was a alopcl.nt and she did not tool the 30 feet easement would be satistaotory. Council Member Hopkins asked how wide was Piney Creek. Ms, Stocec responded she bolteved it was 30 toot; halt of it. Council Member McAdams asked where Piney Creak could go. Ms. Stoott teepondod that it woitld go into the subdivision and from the subdivision Into the shopping oenttt. Denies S ivey, Dovelopment Review planner, reported that $0 reply total had been mailed with 2 returned In favor and 3 in opposition. This planned development was within a low Intensity designatton acts, As a general policy, the low intensity areas cepretontod the primary housing areas with an emphasis on low density residential development, Uivtcsittes housing was strongly encouraged in all areas of the city, The proposed amendment to the planne,3 development was not objtotionable from a technical point of view. The average proposed density was approximately 6.1 units per aaee, which was within a moderate density/intensity level. The mlxcure of the residential ueee appeared to be well balanotd and the cluster and single family detached typlOal lot Site was proposed at a butter between abutting coamoroial and light Industrial zonlnq, Duplex and the cluster land uoe along Colorado Boulevard was ptaotlcal and more restriottvo than the commercial, retail and multi•tamily uses which wets typically proposed along such mayor thoroughfacto. The ShangQee In street patterns and the related containment Met coach to ttaffic was oonsidertd to be an improvement to the Ing plan. In addition to Improved buttering in the transition, a substantial green bolt would separate existing Township It from Phase III of the proposed development, The lots sizes for proposed single family detached portion was comparable to existing development in the area. The typical lot size for the Single family detached, 45 x 120, compared favorably with similar gatdon or patio home development appl~roved in other atais of the Otty Tha proposed duplex lot el2N exceeded normal tontnq ordinono* standards considerably, Staff had strongly encouraged the petitioner and the neighbors to work together. This area had attn many plans submitted and ceyeoted or Many plans that could not boon worked out, This proposal atemed to have a oonesnaus between residents and the petitioner. The planning and toning Commission had recommended the approval with 9 conditions, Condition 5 stated that piney Creek Boulevard shall be reopened for public use. Council Member Alford asked what had been promised to Henry S. Miller by the Council In 1981, Mayor Stewart orated that Piney Creek had been closed upon a . petition submitted by the Township 1 U Hopkins Hills residents. Henry S. Miller was now coking that Piney Creek be abandoned. Q1tY X41111411 Ni'RUt~t ` Nettk1%p of Beptetsbet 1, 1111 Sage rittsea Counnll Member Hapkint Asked if Piney Crook would be a street with curbing and guttorinq end notml set-backs, Kc. Motor respponded that Piney crook would not be an alley but rather lust Who the sirens No, Storer was putting through her residential development, Council Member McAdams asked if the objection was only to the 100 feet. Moaec csplied yeel Henry S. Miller would put in as good a attest as me, Storer, Council Member McAdams asked it the PU had discussed the width of Piney Creek in adding the condition that it be reopened for public use, Spivey responded that the intent for Piney Creek to be used as a publii street but no specific width was mentioned. The present width was 30 to 31 feetl the present right-of-way width on the map eras 100 tent, Crunoil Member Stephens congratulated Ms. etocer tot working with th4 neighbors and for het plan, Council Member McAdams asked it the other halt of the attest should be the same width, tt hardly made tense for a attest through a residential area to be 30 foot on one end and 100 feet at the other, Council Member Stephens said to leave the boulevard as it exists. Ridd W pecger motion, Altocd second to approve :he general schame with 30 foot right-ot-May, Stephens motion to 1pptoVe with the recommendation of the Planning and Zonit11 Commission, Died tot lack of a second. Council Mkmbet Hopkins called the questions. Council Mesbec Stephens asked tot clacitication, Mayor Stewatt responded that the motion on tht floor would mean that Piney Creek would remain essentially as it was. Mayor Pro Tem Chen asked the City Attorney if this proviso would be a substantial change. Aotinq city Attorney Morris responded no, Council Member Stephens asked the engineer for the project how this would impact the area if the council did not follow the P&Z recommendation on Piney Creek . Mc. Oteg Edwards reported that his firm was representing both Ms. Storer and the Henry a. Miller Company. This would constitute a conflict of tnterett to answer any questions, Motion to accept passed unanimously. C. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of JO Storer requesting a Change in toning from the single family (9P-10 and SV-16) zoning classifications to the planned development (PD) classification on a 83.2 acre tract located on the east and west side* of Lillian Miller Parkway (Ridgeway Drive) beginning approximately 1,000 feet south of taterstate Highway ISE. tf approved, the planned development would permit the following lahd usesi I I city council Minutes Meettn0 of sept4mber 4, 1914 Page 8lxtoon 34,2 acres of stngla family (OF-10) detached land use (105 lots with a density of 2.7 Units pper acre) 14.0 40ces of single Coolly (sF-lb) detaohed land use (37 lots with a density of 1,4 units per acre) 17.6 40944 of sin le family detaohod land use 9,4 &acesuattiingli taoil4lAttacheduland use sore) (40 units with 4 density of 4,3 units pec aore) The Mayor opened the public heattnq. Mot Jo Stococ, the petitioner, stake in favor stating that she would like to explain the kind of zonnv that had been arranged toe tilts property, Use* would be 8F-16 at the top (retectinq to the overhead projection of the plan) with a oul-de-sae street through it. This portion would be called The Ridge of southridge, There were 25 lots in excess of 16,000 square toot, Across the top there would be another section that will back up to the existing 164000 square lot lots in the existing southrldgo area, Below, that, there would be some SF-10, Along Ridgeway was planned two single family separate individual houses to be on individual lots but attached with garages and gates and fences, set, The houses would not be attached, Aetoos the way would be the portion called southeidge Place, which would be a voty high siourity area with single family houses on separate lots and a lot a g4oon soaoe around it, (noluded would be )a ging trails, possibly tennis court, swimain pool, A masonacy wall would be constructed around the outside. i1e, stater then presented photographs of pojoots In Poet Worth and Dallas with stmilAt architecture, to the two section would have a .berm along Ridgeway which would set those houses back off the street somewhat, This would leave many treat and landseap.ny in front of the houses. • There would be aul-de sacs and a pcvlate, 20 toot street in from of the houses. Charles WatkLne, with Fields, Edwards and Associates, spoke In favor of the petition stating that he was repcssenttng Mrs, 8tocer In connection with this case. 8inoe the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, It had come to that, attention that there was Some confutton or some misunderstanding with respect to this particular case, His tiro had made applLcation to the city toe zoning on the entire e3 acre tract as a planned development as because it it one unified development being dev610ped by one developer, The area being shown on the overhead projeotion as 8F-lo and then the band of 8F-16 was currently zoned 8F-10, The area to the upper eight that was shown as BF-16 was euceently zoned SF-16. Because typically the staff ltko• a planned development type of zoning classification because it is all one unified development, his fiem had asked for planned development zoning on the entire tract, The purpose to,, the band of BF-16 zoning to the north was existing SF-16 housing aid the developer agreed to put in SF-16 zoning as a butter tot the ekistinq bF-16 to the north, The SF-10 area predominantly would be developed as totkad, When the request tot zoning was made it had been the intent to zone this atea SF-16 and 8F-10 in accordance with all the City of Denton zoning regulations. to order to clear up any misunderstanding, the developer would request to add a condition to this planned development that all arena designated tot single family OF-16 and jingle family BF-10 will be davelope4l in accordance with all requirements of the Zoning oedinanoe, The petitioner also was requesting that the 9.4 acres be labeled single family attached. The developer had in mind that the houses, the living units at a density Level of only 4,3 units per acre, would be built such that they would be detached but the garages or tenotrng areas would be attached. Me. Watkins stated that he felt this was consistent with some of the photographs presented earlier, To clear any oisunderstandinq with cespeat to this particular area, the petitioner requested that the Council add a aondition that all dwelling In the single family attached area would be detached except for accessory uses such as garages, storage space and fences. Mr. Watkins then stated that he believed the staff was at' the opinion that the area designated single family detached, on qtr,y tlounOii Ninutes Meeting Of September 44 1464 page Seventeen the right fide Of Ridgeway Rrive, exOeeded the Intensity standard tot that acea. He then presented a bar graph of an analysis which he had completed with respect to the intensity on the right hand side of Ridgeway Drive, an atea consisting at 326 acres. It graph included the Dimension 0evelopMent CotApany proposal and some area to the south and to north. The graph showed the Intensity standard Coe the 326 acts area. The graph also 414play,9d the intensity of the Rlmension Development company proposal, which was in excess at 15,000 trip$ per day as Wall as the intensity of all exiettAq zoning in this pacticulac intensity acea. Also depicted was the intensity reserved Coc this area and the Intensity of this request, which vas 14060 trips per day, 1C the zoning was approved, the entire intensity tot the acea Would slightly exoeeda the intensity standard. The 326 acts intensity acea was approxtmately one-halt the size of a nocmal Intensity area as the prototype was a square mile, 440 antes. It the Counoll Chose to expound the boundaries of the intensity acea, this development would fats, within the etandatd0. Mr. Watkins Concluded by stating that he Celt this particular land plan was an excellent one this acea. It Was entirely single tamtly development and would be an asset to this area. It would resolve future zoning issues. There Were 38.2 acres of 8F-10 lots proposed, 18 acres of $F-14 lots proposed. This will be an asset to this area and to eouthrtdge. Dr. Roland Vela spoke in favor of the petition stating that he was oautiouely In favor of this coning change or this planned development.. He had been a homeowner since 1963 and had seen one neighborhood attic another despolled In that time. He Was in favor of this development because he thought It Would help to keep the neighborhood as It was. He was cautious about the eventuality of what might in happen 3 years, He Curtner stated that Me. Watkins was worried that It would be difficult to sell 8h-16 lots but he was . woccied that next year another proposal would be requested to change the Sr-16 to a SF-6 or commerotal. The testdents Of 804thrtdge Were vety fortunate and he had respect for me, Watkins inviting the CtCy council to put a condition on this proposal. Vela asked that the Counoll write into the proposal that these would be tingle family houses and not anything else and Nether urged the Council to set the zoning and not Chanqu },t again, The cestdents had soon changes over and over again and In moat cases, cases in zoning were dettlmental to a neighborhood. This case would augment the nature of the neighborhood and Mr. Vela stated that he would like to see the council approve it with the seoond condition that these would be no mote Changes. The nntghbocs wanted the development of the land to be In character with what was in place. They would hate to see another motorcycle shop of a shopping Center that would destroy the nature of the homes. Dr. Vela then asked about the 9.4 acres with four unite wanting to know if the four units were single dwellings or would be going up a stories. Mayor stewact asked Dr. Vela not to ask questions and guaranteed that the Council would ask that question during the staff presentation. Vela responded that he would give hearty approval to the proposal it the four units were four single Easily dwellings) not four duplexes, of four quadruplexes, at four aOndOxlatuMS yer act*. The same was true of the portion of the petition requesting six units pet acts. He hoped that this was not simply a echeiae by Which to introduce high density housing a little bit at a time and next year the 6r-.16 would go Into higher density units because some were already in place due to this petition. He again urged the Council to place another condition on the petition stating that this would be the last zoning change, Mayor Stewart stated that this Council could not bind future Councils. It would be illegal to say that no other Council could look at the zoning in this area. CttY CouhOtt minutes Meettap of September tl14 Page 0t~1hteen mt. Vela ucged the Council to protect the netghbothoods In Denton, Mr, W. P. Phillips, sttocney for the petitioner, spoke in favor and responded to Or, Vala'e question stating that the tout unite per acre were tingle family unite, He fuethmc stated that he was representing Jo Stocec and that he had oonfldencs in het plan and what she planned to do, He was particularly interested In coming the oooplttion of Southridge Drive to GiLltan Miller Parkway which would ycovide another outlet from Southcidge, He knew of no one who opposed tho plan because It was tinglt family dwellings and 8F-16 and 8F-10 in conjunotion with the other peojectc as outlined, Council Member Rtdd Usperyer asked it the developsent plan would entail the developer building the other halt of Lill an Millec Parkway, Phillips responded that he had not heard anybody talk about widening that particular parkway at this time, No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Dents$ Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that 75 reply focus sailed to pcopetty owners within 200 feet with S returned In favor and 15 In opposition. The 03.2 core tract was located in a low Intensity area as designated by the Denton Development Outdo, These low intensity areas cepcesent the city's primary housing areas and should emphasiat teeidenttal use. Alt of the land uses Inoluded in this proposal were tot tingle family uses. Mr. Matkinsls presentation addressed the intensity usual the stave a position Watt the Planning and Zoning Commission on the intensity issue was that the Inteasity analysis prepared for the Dimension Development . zoning vase Indicated that the coning approved on that tract utlltzed all of the available intensity on the east aide of Ridgeway Drive. The staff report to the POZ had indicated that and suggested that the intensity standard for that area east of Ridgeway, or Gillian Miller Parkway, was tilled to oapscity by the Dimension Development proposal and that additional high intensity and higher density land uses should not be recommended foe approval, The minimum reserved development eights would permit low density SF-10 type of residential land use It the Intensity was strictly enforced on the east side of Lillian Millet Parkway. This was the ataws position. It was true than with the addition of this development, the intensity standard was slightly exceeded. The Planning Commission felt that the diffecenee over the standard was not enough to wake a significant Impact in this cast and recOmmend approval of this request by a vote of 4 to 2. Another issue that staff was concerned about was that the Dimension Development request was approved by altar trig a boundary line of the intensity study developed by the staff. The staff had prepared an Itt:eneity sr.udy showing one line and the Dimension Deveiopment Company had done a separate intensity study which was indicated as Intensity Study 40A in the back-up materials. They had adjusted the line so that their development would fit the numbers there. This second boundary line had never been formally adopted, Staff asked that either this line should be adopted or the original line adopted as the intensity study, Mayor Stewart asked 0pivey to answer Council Member Riddlespergar's question on Ridgeway ucive, Council Member Riddlespecgec stated that his question had to do with the development of Ridgeway Drive which was supposed to be a four land road. Was the developer supposed to develop the other two lanes. Spivey, responded that, as she understood it, the two lanes that were ouctently in or currently being finlahtid wete.on the aids next to the single fau ly attaohed section. The developer would not be required to put chat in as It was already there. WIN city Coaaoil Kinutes Keehn of September t, 1111 Page x~neteen counoil Kembet Itid4lespetgec stated that he Mae Wetting to the • othot two lanes, O A M responded that the City's platting tequlations normally held developers responsible tot pectmettt street pavingp, that to areas that are along the trontage of the property. The stagle Easily detached station on the othet olds of this petition would fall under the normal platting regulations Maroc Stewart stated that it was his understanding that when the City paved Ridgeway the developer, as they came through and developed, WOUld pay their portion of the street and asked if this was bang ignored, City Manager Hartung respponded not there was a street assessment for the whole length of l.tlllan Miller parkway and as those properties ohanged hands or were being developed, that paving assessment is being retired, In affect, the developec paid tot the two lanes that wets in now. The City dibn't put that tn. Council Ktabet Hopkins asked it what was going to occur was that the state would be paying for the other two lanes? Hartung responded that the plan was to approach the state to have this included on the state system as an addition to the farm to market system as ask them to add the two lanes, Council Membec Hopkins asked if the total cight-ot-way had been dedicated, Hartung responded that it was already there, Council Member Riddlespetger asked if it was 80 or 90 testa Hartung responded that it was not too feet, Council Kembse Alford asked, in the event that the state did not do this, what would the Ciroumttancet be than. Hartung responded it would than be like any other street and would be city responsibility. Council Member Alford asked it this woo an different from Mr. Bancroft's petition when the Council rsquiced him to pave, Council Member McAdams responded that this was slightly different in that the Council had asked Me, Bancroft to pays both sides of the street even through his property was on just one side, Council Kembsc Riddleapetgec added that Me, Bancroft had been required to pave In front of a lot that wasn't his, Council Member Molkdtms than stated that Me, Bancroft's paving was an entrance to coMmetelal toning, Council Member Hopkins asked it the Council should go ahead and have the developer pave now and reimburse the cost? Council Member Aitocd responded not the point was It the Council required one petition to pave, what was the difference with another, Maroc Stewart stated that City required the paving for the minimum street width. The minimuM width on Ridgeway was already in and as developers Constructed, they paid. This portion had been paid for, It the state approved Ridgeway as a farm to market road instead of Teasley, than it the City would request that state continue the road and then the state would pay toe the paving, Ott COON Minutes 114M49 of optomber 4, 1444 Page T"I%ty . Counoil Member Stephens stated that at the June sth meeting the Counoil had asked staff to look into 4 new or4104noa that would reimburse mt. Banoroft, or other developers in slmilac situations, when the area they tRprov44 developed, The idea was not to ponalt%s Mc, Bancroft but to get toimbucs4m4nt Ccom the property adjacent to that dsVOlopment and this woe exactly the same situation, Council 144mb4c Stephens stated that he 4pprecL4te4 the oanoocned that had been mentioned by some of she citizens at the publlo hearing, In Oonvertattone with the developer, hoc representative and the City attorney, an 49team.ont had been coached that the petition for PC would coctatnly apply to those 41;040 where a change w41 to o0cur, Or. Stephsno then stated that Its did not see any reason to Change the BY-16 to PD oc 611-10 to PO if it was going to remain as SP-16 or BP-l0. He futthet stated that he had Yocyy stconq cemetvattons that he had shared with the devol,opst regarding the single Cagily attached poctlon, In all 4ceas of town these were single family units attached by fences which would tend to make that the standard 4et4oh4d, He would like to see the single enmity attached portion be Changed to single family detached but did not feel that would constitute a Substantial change Which would require the petition being retested back to the POx. Stephens motion, Chow Second to approve x-1602 with the conditions attaoh44 that the only plannod development part would be just as a land use change ooeucced and that the Council change the west Side of Lillian Millet Parkway to Single family detached. It would still be tot* lot line, tot ekaMp14 in a OluStered attangoRent but he would feel better pcotsoted by having the single family detached read to on the plan. Mayor Stewart aeked Council Member Stephens is he was Involved in . any negotiations on this petition, Council Member Stephens responded that he did not negotiation. He did Visit with the petitioner and with Some of the neighbors. The petitioner wanted to show the plan to the residents. He had visited with this petitioner as he had with most of the petitioners that have come before the Council, Mayuc St4Watt asked Council Member Stephens if he had called a meeting on this petition, Council Member Stephens responded that the petition has stated that the would like to talk to speak to the residents and wanted him, as the elected cepresentatlve for that district, to Share with them hoc concern. The number had grown beyond what would tit into a living boom, He had introduced hoc to the group. He had asked the group to come Cot het address and had, merely convened the meeting. He had stepped out at that point, No agreement, atrangdaent or any thing else was reached. This had been a general dtacueslon, Mayor Stewart asked it any of the City state at the meeting? Council Member Stephens stated that he did not recall any of the City staff being present. Mayor Stewact responded that it was his understanding that one or two were. Council Member Stephens than stated that Ms. Jacmon had left some density/intensity figures on the desk in the management area, but he did not recall any staff being present, City Manager Hartung asked Mr. Watkins it the field notes reflected the entire area or if new field notes would be required if the motion was passed. Watkins the field fiotes reflected the entire area. i City Coutlail Minutes Hooting ot.September 4, 1964 ?ago Twomy 004 , Hartung 6t4te4 that he would like to have olarifioatlon, The Notion was tC diteot the Attotney to modify the otdinanoe with Council Msmb4c Stephens revisions and bting back another ordinance, oounotl Maabet Stephens stated that he did not know of any disagreement with the revisions. The only things items under the planned development =oning would be just where the land use changed and the attached on the west side of Ridgeway would be detached, Hartung cestated that the ordinance would have to be revised and placed on the next agenda toe Council Approval. City Attorney Morris stated that the council could approve the petition with the new conditions and being it back and approve the ordinance, Council Member McAdams stated that she observed that this particular request gives some credance to the one which the Council had looked at eatll#tt, This one provides for 6 unite pet acre which diacussed eaelite as being so objectionable in an 4[440( large homes. This would suggest that perhaps it is not ditt oult with large lots for somebody other than Me. Hodgson to develop. SU: units tot acre was acceptable and tailed. Motion oaccled d to 2 with Council Member Hopkins and Mayor Stewart oasttnq the nay votes. 0, The Council held a public healing cegatding the use of Federal Revenue funds toe the fiscal year 1964-69. The Mayor opened the public hearing, No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in Opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. 1. The Council held a public heating on the fiscal year 1964-84 budget. John Moarans, Director of finance, reported that it was a charter requirement to hold a public hearing on the proposed budget, The Mayor opened the public hearing, Me, Greg Taylor, !test Viea-president of the Denton Firefighters Association, spoke in. opposition stating that the fltetlghters did not feel that the proposed 7% edit* was enough, The Council had recently approved an ordinance which in sttvot had out the firefighters salaries by 3%. A 7% salary would, in effect, bo a 4% eats*. The same ordinance had out the Vacation/bonus pay in halt. Council Member Riddlesperger stated that Me. Taylor was saying that the Ceunoik had out the pay and this was only a proposed budget. 'The Council had not taken any toemal action on the hlAdget. Me Taylor responded that the ordinance which had been approved regarding policies on holiday pay had out the Firefighters pay by approximately 3%. This would affect the proposed budget 7% pay rates. to the past the management, staff and Council had boon opposed to giving the firefighters additional pay because the turn- over rate had not been great enough, to 1979 the rite Department did not lose anyone) in 1980 they had last 1 rirefightocl In 1981 they lost 31 in 1962 they lost 11 in 1983 they lost 71 in 1984 they had lost 2 already and would probably lase another 2. Me. Taylor then asked what percentage of turn-ovet would the trice Department have to have to get the same consideration as the polkas Department, rout parameaius had left in 1963-84, which was a lost of a substantial investment by the oit.y to train these employees. r niC Cougo#l Minate~ Meetthg of 9epteK0et 4, 1914 Page Twenty Two The FitfftV 491 had eliminated the po'leibiltty of receiving parity PAY with the Police, Council ilelebert had Rppoken of aompacatlw pay stating that the Denton Fitetightecs should be paid approximately the same as other area rice Depactxents. A survey had been done taken tram the Texas state Aseoolation of Ficeflghers state-Wtde survey of salaries done in Ma of 1914, Out of the twelve Cities on the survey, Denton was the last in pay, The average pay of the twelve cities in the motroplex cities was 11419 while Denton't starting pay was 11407 per Month. seven pergont would not catoe the salaries wen to the average of this pay and was no where near competitive. It would take between a 16% and 251 pay increase to get Denton to an average salary, throughout the ranks, The Firefighters Nallted that this would be a burden to the taxpoyete but Celt to become salary competitive, this would be a starting point, statements had been made to the press by the staff that the City was not going to try to be competitive, The city was gcowinq and each ysac that selectee were not competitive, the rice Department lost that much mace. The city limits woes expsndinq and the rice Department had to grow and be competitive or there would be a lose of quality petsonnel, The Fttetightecs felt that the proposed 71 inotease was not enough tot the type job being done, The ceaent oltitene survey showed a response from Dentonltes that the rice De actment was the beet department in the city, Me. Taylor then asked if the ricettghters werf being penalltsd because they did a good job and did not quit, Council Mexboc McAdams stated that she wanted to olatlfy the newspaper attlole which had read that Denton was not trying to meet the area salaries, That statement had been made regatdinq salaries Department. tor e was at colpoose a to council,$ ddiscussion ?Lee the total budget and total salaries tot all city employees, It was (to reflection at all on the rice Department, It had been pointed out to the Council that salaries foe virtually every pity employee • was under the area, tango from 11% to 26%, Makdams stated that she wanted to make it cleat that staff did not say to Council that they were not going to try to Improve salaries. Staff was only recommending salaries in an attempt to improve the situation. Council Member Stephens asked Me. Taylor about the current staffing In the rtts Department, Mr. Taylor responded that the City of Dallas recently completed a study which found It to be cost effective to staff a minimum of 4 Firetlghtats on a truck 24 hours per day. In order to acoompliah this, 5 to a ri Nfightscu would have to be assigned to each truck to cover foe vacation and holidays, These were times in the Denton rice Department when they could not maintain 3 Firefighters on a truck. Mayor Stewart asked about the possibility of the Firefighters working an a hour day. Taylor eesponded that he believed this would require the hieing of a complete shift of approximately 2s people, The Mayor closed the public heating, 5. Otdinanoto A. The Council considered adoption of an otlinance approving a change in 2oning ftOm planned development (PD-19) and single tamily (SF-10) to a revised planned development classification on 161.7 tares beginning at the intersection of Teasley Lane and Gillian Miller Parkway (Ridgeway Drive), Z-1660 . David Lllison, Senior Planner, tepocted that staff had nothing to add. city co notl Ninu>;es Meetiaq of $40tewber 4, 1944 Page Twenty 'three The following ordinance was ptesentom N0, 61-109 AN ORDINANCE REPEALINQ TtM EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE AND ENACTINQ A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE FOR THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIONDI AMENDING THE ZONING PAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AS SAME NAG ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF uRDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON SY ORDINANCE NO, 49-1 TO PROUtDE FOR A CK WE IN ZONING CLASGIFiCATION AND USE DESIGNATED FROM SINGLE FAMILY "SF-10" TO PLANNED DEVUONMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE AS SAID PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP APPLIES TO 161,7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TRAGLEY LANE AND LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND AG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRISRD HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Council Member Stephens stated that PO-19 was established In 1974 and this pattioulac request had been discussed at the June 19, 1944 Council meeting, He than asked the City Attorney about procedures to limit the apartment units to the amount that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended, which was 250, instead of the 390 units in this ordinance, Stephens felt this would set the balance for the total program, Aor.inq City Attorney Joe Morris suggested that the Council could follow the same procedure as in the previous planned devolopment ordinance. A notion could be made to amend the ordinance as presented and, it approved, the ordinance would be revised and brought back to the Counoll Car final approval. Stephens motion, Chew second to approve the original plan as submitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, The company ylanning to develop was not inVolVed with the original PD-19. The idea was to keep what P&Z had ceoommendedt the only change would be to reduce the density tram 390 to 250. Council Member McAdams stated that zoning went with the property and not the person. That property was peoperly Zoned and allowed foe the 390 multi-family units, The buyer who purchased the property had every right to believe that the Boning went with the property The only reason the petition had to come back before P&Z or Council at all was because the City had realigned Ridgeway Drive. council Member Stephens responded that the Flannlnq and Zoning Commission had spent considerable time trying to work out a balance of various housing types, council Member McAdams stated that she believed that a granted zoning request should not be changed unless there was a dire need and this would set a pace precedent, Council Member 3tephe.ns stated that the P&Z had, reviewed the plans under 1964 conditions on what would go where and had looked long and hard at the present situation. Council Member Hopkins stated that in a previous zoning request before the Council at this meeting, the ir,tonsity did not matter and now intensity was a big problem. He asked what was the difference. The intensity was important and it was a 1904 problem but he did not feel the council should take away something team a developer who had spent hundeeds of thousands of dollars to do In good faith. Motion to approve with 250 multi-fasily units per care tailed 5 to 2 with Council Members McAdams, Hopkins, Alford, Rlddlespecgec and Mayor Stewart casting the nay votes. city council Minutes Meeting of $oP%4%0et 4, 1944 Page Twenty rout McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance as pcesentfd, On Coll call Vote, McAdams Hopkins "aye," Stephens "nay," Alford "aye." RiddlespergeC "aye," Chew "nay," and MayOc Stewart "aye," Motion oaccted S to 2 with council Member Stephens and Mayor Pro Tom Chov oaottnq the nay votes. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Appendix A to the Code of Ocdinanoes of the City of Denton. Texas, known and cited as the Denton Development Code, b ,.mending Article III. Chapter CV, Article 4-16, Patagcaph (A) relating to lot size, width and depth requirements for proposed ksubdiviotons and doclacing an w eative date, Steve Fanning, Planning and Community Development, cepocted that this amending to the subdivision regulations regarded imposing a minimum lot six* in the extra-territorial Juc adiction, In a previous Council action which amended the cegula,i0ne to requite the same requirements in the extra-territorial yuctsdiotton as in the city, staft fatted to amend the lot size category. This ordinance make the lot size roqulcements the same, This was not an attempt to control, land use in the ETJ but 0(,ly to set a lot give. The lot size would be got on what Wes proposed at the platting stage, This would noc guaranteed that that would be what was actually developed, A 44velopec could proposed one time and actually conltruot another without vouing. Staff dil$ not sae that as a mayor problem. The following ordinance was pcesontedi N0. 14.110 • AN ORDINANCE AM8RDtNQ APPENDIX A TO THE COOK OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS, KNOWN AND CITE) AS THE DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDINQ ARTICLE IIt4 CHAPTER IV, ARTICLE 4.16, PARAGIIAPH (A) RELATING TO LOT SIZE, WIDTH AND DEPTH REQUIREMENTS VOR PROPOSED SUBDIVISIONS AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Riddleopecgor motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On Coll call vote, McAdams Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlospocgar °aya," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried unanimously. C, The Council considered adoption of an ordinaaa~4 and service plan annexing a traot of land consieting of approximately 31,336 acres of land located on the east side of rM 2164 (North Locust Street) and west of the Twin Lakes Mobile Home Pack, &-I Council Member Hopkins stated that this item had been previously discussed. The following ordinance was preeontedi NO. A4-ill AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT Or LAND CONTIGUOUS AND ADJACENT TO THE CITY Or DENTON, TEXASI EEINO ALL TRkT LOT, TRACT OR PARCEL Or LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 31.336 ACRES OF LAND LYINQ AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY Or DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEtNQ PART Or THE V. E. SAILOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 4521 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSTFYINa THE SAM AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY, AND DECLARINO AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, Riddl a perger second to adopt the otdinance, on colt call vote, McAdams "ayG." Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," RiddlfipfCQar "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. Cityy Qou11oi1 Minutes X40 tog of 8e tembec 40 1944 Page 't'wenty live D, The CounoiI gonetdeced Adoption of an Ordinance Adopting the 191; VALtots lire Code and Astondmentl to provide toc tire Safer tnepeotione of building, tire exttnqulshtng, sprtnklec and standpipe -jyetsme, end t,~mmable storage taoilittesl providing tot inspection and permit toes and repealing all ordinanos in conflict. City Manager Hartung reported that periodically the city adopted updated vecetons of various codes. The Ftce Chief and Vice Marshall were reoommendiua that Council adopt the 1982 Code to replace the 1974 edition which was currently in effect, Counoii Member Stephens asked tot an ovtcvtew of the suostantattve changes. Jack Qentcy, Fire Chief, responded that there were no drastic changes in the 1982 code, This code would set tooth penalties toe violations of the fire code, Staff had added fess to the 1982 code for various Installations and tire inspections. The following otdinance was presentedi N0. 84-112 Fie ORDINANCE REPEALINO ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER LO OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEKASI ENACTING A NEW ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM FIRE COW 1917 EDITION AND AM WOWNTS THERETOI TO PROVIDE FOR FIRE SAFETY IROPECTIONS OF BUtLDINOS, FIRE EXTINQUI8HINQ, SPRINKhRK AND STANDPIPE SYSTEMS, AND FLAMMABLE STORAQE FACILITtESI PROVIDtNQ FOR INSPECTION AND PERMIT FEES; PROVIDINQ FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR VIOLATIONS THERROF; REPEALINO ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PROVtDtNQ FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance, On toll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins Stephens abstained, Alford "aye," Riddlecperger "aye," Chow "nay," and Mayor Stewart Motion carried 5 to 1 with Council Member Stephens abstaining until he could obtain more Information On the Cost and Mayer Pro Tea Chow casting the may vote, E. The Council coneideed an ordinance Abandonlnq an easement to the Greater Denton Acts Council, st al tract. Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the owners of the property had requested the abandonment of the easement in order to obtain a olsac title. The following ordinance WAS presented; NO. 84-113 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDIHQ FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF A TRACT OF LAND DEDICATED FOR UTILITY AND STREET RIQHT-OF-WAY WITHIN THE CITY OF DENTON AND AUTHORIZINQ THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A QUITCLAIM DEED CONVRYiNQ ALL RIOHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY IN WD LAND TO THE OWNER OF THE ADJACENT TRACT OF LAND; AND DECLARINQ AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Alford motion, Riddlespecgec second to adopt the ocdinanoe. On roll Call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlespecgec "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried urtanlmously. 6. Resolutions . A. The Council cohsideced approval of a resolution establishing At Minority Business Rnterptise Program for the Denton municipal Airport. CityY Council Minutes Meettnq of se texbee 4, 1904 Page Twenty six Bill Angola, Assistant to the Dice0tor of Public works, reported that the resolution would establish the Minority buainess enterprise Proycan for the airport. This particular pcogcIit was a regitiment to receive,wh The wprogram hadd been review d fin oontenth by ithe h ppCity Attotneyls offioe and the FAA and not their approval, The following resolution was presented: RE a,0LUT 10N MHRRRAS, the Aicpoct Manager of the City of Denton Municipal Airport has developed and prepared a Minority business Enterprise Program tot subslttal to the United States Department oe Ttanspottaton in satisfaction of the Depattmsnt's Regulations tot the receipt at federal assistance tot the aitpoct as set Corth in the Code of Federal Requlations, 49 CFR Part 23: and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, desitss to ensure that minottty business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the ~ertoManoe of contracts or subcontracts relating to airport %peovements financed In whole of in pact with federal funds provided under such minority business c:.,;etpcise agreement: NOW, T'I'itREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY or DENTON, TEXAS; SECTION 1. That the Denton Municipal Airpoette Minority Business Rnterpriss Plan, inaludinq a policy statement and agreement, . consisting of etgi,t pages, attached hereto as Exhibit °A° and incorporated herein by cetetenee, be and the same is horiiby adopted and approved, SECTION It. That the City Manager of the City of Denton, Texas, or his deslgnse, shall administer the Minority Business Enterprise Program in compliance with Its teems and conditions and those set totth In the United States Department of Transportation's Rsqulatione pertaining thereto, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 4th day of September, 1984, RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LtaAL FORM: JOE D.. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: City Council Iflnutes Meeting of lepteaber 4, 1944 Page Twenty Seven Chew notion, KaWme second that the resolution be approved, on roll Call vote, KOA4404 "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," AltOrd "aye," Rtddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," motion oacrted unanimously. B, The Council considered approval of a ceeolutton to readopt the 1964 update to the Denton Development quid*. Stove Fanning, Planning and Community Developpment, reported that the Denton Development Quids had a number of different ways to update the gulden one was a yearly totma% update pcoceduce, The Counotl would be considecinq a draft taken tram the July work session regarding the tentative recommendations toe updattng and clarifying the quid*, council Member Stephens asked about the portion tegarding the 3 year time limit on planned development to have made substantial development (16% be started). Fanning stated that he had included the intent of the council but had not worked out the wording in the Guide to make It consistent with state law, Council Member Stephens then asked how staff would deal with an owner who Objected to the unilateral action to toll back the zoning. Did this imply that when d petitionet had appeaced before the P&Z and Council, and had tRoetved the fLnancing, would they accept what the Council had done; did that become a contract that they would breach with the 15t stipulation, Fanning responded that all question: could not be answered at this point. Staff was requesting Council to make clear their intent to see development and than let staff work with the 14141 aspects and come back with speaittc procedures. The following resolution was ptesentedi R E 8 0 L U T 10 N WHEREAS, the City of Denton has and expects to continue to enjoy a pattern of growth and development throughout the 1980's and beyond; and WHEREAS, the community in response to such growth and development has inotituted a process to address questions of land use planninq, development and control; and WHEREAS, as a result of such process a document iItled Denton Development Guide Met) was produced; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas believes that such document Is a useful tool to be used to aid in the day-to-day decisions concerning growth and development of the City and adopted the Gut a toe such use; and WHEREAS, the policies contained in the 1981 Guide ate reviewed annually by the Planning and zoning commission tot their recommendation to the City Council as to amendments and modifla.ttions to be made tn the 1981 Guide; and WHEREAS, the Planning and zoning Commission has completed its L963-84 annual review of the 1961 quids and hereby makes Its recommendation that the 1981 Guide be amended, to provide for incorporation of the attached policies and procedures; NOW, THEREFORE, HE RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS% Aity Counatl M1r>ptee Meetinq of September 40 1914 Page Twenty Might 119SISd.I. DtAL90 RIM is hereby amended, toatprovide or t o noorpo w on o r e attached poltoto4 and procedures therein, and said as mended, to hereby adopted as the official land use and development QUide for the City to be used in tutute planning, devoloppmont and land us* deotstont in the manner and tot the purposes therein stated until such time it is cepe,U.ed or hsceatter amended. PASSED AND APPROVED this 4th day of September, 1901, 91CHARD IF MWART, RAYU CITY OF DEhTON, TEXAS ATTEM CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CI SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPaMp As TO LEGAL MORMI JOE MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY; Chew motion, Hopkins seoond that the resolution be approved. On roll call vote, NOW%$ ,AVG," Hopkins "aye," Stephens 11ay6,11 Afford . "aye," Riddlospetgee "aye," Chew and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 7. The Council then considered approval of tentative award of aid 0 9238 for ispeovoments at the Denton Municipal Aicport, Bill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported that the city had teoeived 3 bids on this project. The lowest bid was submitted by Atkins Brothers Equipment Company in an amount of $400,127.00. Staff had reviewed the bid and the city engineering staff had worked With this particular firm and felt they were capable of performing the job. This was only a tentative award of bid. When the grant offer was teoeived from the FAA, staff would appost before Council requesting acceptance of the FAA bid and the Final award of this bid. Council Mabee Hopkins asked what would be the elty,s portion of the payment, Angelo responded that the city had approximately $0,000 left in the airport impeovement fund remaining from previous grant monies. This money was committed to airport improvements and would be used towards the City's portion of the matching funds. Council Member Altotd asked it that was the total expenditure. Angelo stated that this was 90♦ to 10% money match project, The total projaot, including the engineering, would be in the neighborhood of $499,000. The city would have to pay approximately $49,000 and presently had $45,000 In the airport improvement fund. Stephens motion, Hopkins second to approve the tentative award of Bid M 9236. Motion carried unanimously, • 8. The Council considered taking a record vote or, the proposed tax increase tot fiscal yeat 1964-6S. City MIAO l Minutes Meeting of 00ytomboy 4, 1114 Pape Twenty We . John MoCrano, Director of trinanoo, reported that the proposed budget was based on an ad valorum tax tnectsle of 20 over the last years adcipted rate. This represented an increase over the effective rate of 4.670. state law required when the increase was over 31 that certain procedures must take place, The procedure was that a ceootd vote ?=Hd to be taken on the pcopooed incroaso, then a public hearing on the proposed tax increase be held prior to the final adoption. The public heating was set for September 13 and the final vote would be taken on September 19. Hartung stated that this was not a binding votes however, it was required to meet time deadlines for the public heating. Council Member McAdams asked it the council were to set the increase at 3,, what would be the procedure. Moarane responded that the Increase would have to be readvertitad, Mayor Pro Took Chew stated that he did not believe he was ready to advtrttse for the tax increase as several issue were still unresolved In the budget prooess. City Manager Hartung stated that this was strictly tot the tax cats under the truth in taxation lavt it would not aftect any other portions of the budget, tt was strictly the levying Of the tax rate. Mayor Pro Tes, Chew suggested that the Council set the proposed tax Increase higher and could than out back aEcec the budget review was completed. Mo0cana added a caution that If the increase went over 81, it would be 6ubl4ot to referendum, Two vents would amount of 4.671 increase and crust mote would be getting very close to e1. Council Member McAdams expressed concern over the Council looking themselves in to an amount prior to the completion of the budget hearings. City Manager Hartung reported that It a higher increase was warranted, it would not delay the adoption of the budget. staff could readvactise the public hearing and pass the tax levy after the budget was approved, This would only result in a delay in mailing the tax statemento. Mcarane reported that council could Advertise for the maximum amount not requiring a referendum, The Council delayed this Item until later in the agenda to allow the Finance Director to calculate the increase to be advertised, 10. The Council considered removing zoning case Z-1677 from the table. Stephens motion, Hopkins second to remove Z-L677 from the table. Motion carried unanimously. it. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance appproving a change in zoning from the single easily (SK-7) and agetoultural (A) classification to the planned dovelosent (PD) classification on a 52 acre trat located at the northwest corner of Lattimore Street and Audca Lane, Z-1677 Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that, the Council had requested staff to look at two alternatives for street placement In • this toning case. The developer had proposed an easttcn alignment on their property with 60 feet '.of right-of-way. The problem had been a large amount of treat wo,)ld be lost and the landowners who abutted on the east would have to give 20 feet of tight-of-way. The Ctty Qourotl Htnuto4 Keeling of 14ptoober 44 1944 Page Thirty 1 other Me V40 S we6teip alignment, in otthec cafe the road would take soot of the trees. The wootorn altgdmtnt 14YOS more trees except when the 404toper began construction of the houses. The eastern allgnoont would have same of the trees on the west and also the trees next to the eight-of-way line on each tide might etay, The altgnment would work aithet way, The western alignment would go 409010 the church property to the south. The prObtom would be who would buy the right-ot-wa and build the road accost the church property. The pcobltm witK the western alignment was that many of the lots would front on Audra Lane which was a secondary arterial, The subdivision rules and regulations state there should be a mtnimum of 200 toot spacing between drive ways and that would ntt be possible. The eastern aligqnment also aligned better with Nottingham to the north, Staff felt the eaetorn alignment of the toad was the best chat**, It might take more trees but it would allow for botte9 traffic alignment, better alignment of the lots with existing Audta Lao* and would eliminate all of the ttontage of the late on Aud a Lane, Council Mambec Stephens asked how many ttaet would be lost, Svehla responded that was difficult to say but it appeared it would be approximately the same for either the western or eastern alignment, The following ordinance was pretontedt NO, 64-ill AN ORDtNKWCE ANENDINQ THE ZONINQ MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SANE WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THIS CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO, . 49.1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO $2 ACRES OF LAND 40CATMD AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF L-ATTIMORE STRRET A" AUDRA LANE, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRISEO HEREINI TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANCE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM OINQLE FAMILY "OF-701 AND AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DE$tQNATION TO PLANNED DEVRLOPMENT "PD" CLASSIFICATION AND USE 0E9IGNATtON1 A" PROVIDtNQ FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Riddlespecgar motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance with the eastern alignment of the street, Council Member Stephens stated that at the previous public hearinq the pastor of the church had asked how tat the western alignment would be from the church. Svahla replied with the western alignment it would be over 100 feet from the church, it would be further away from the church with the eastern alignment. The developer had stated that he would work with the church. Mal Carolyn Williams stated that she was concerned about the 20 feet that would be taken off of her property. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins '-aye,,, Stephens "dye," Alford "aye," RiddItopseger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart 11aye1" Motion carried unanimously, 111 The Council eonaidered aproval of proposed authorization to perform professional services for design of approximately 7000 feet of sanitary sawerline in conjunction with John Pate Investments from property on Dallas Drive to pecan Creek/Woodrow Lane twin out[ail Interceptor. . Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that on July 24 the Council had approved the concept of the City of Denton participating in a sewecline from the accost of Dallas Drive and Teaefey Lane to city counoii Kinutes 1leetinq of /tptembtt 44 1114 Page Thirty One the outfAll tone nest Woodrow Lane, At that time, staff toposed to pay 50% of the e09tn4 rtnq costs, John Past 1nveNtments had proposed to use in en9kneocing tifm at an anticipated cost of 130400 and the city would participate in the amount of 116,000. The oontcaot would be on a time and cost baste and would be limited to $111,000. at$ hQns motion, Hopkins second to approve the authotization, Motion carried unanimously, lal The CounoiI consideced tpptoval of an Agreement tot sanitary pro rata participation toC Hlokory Ccttk Limited and the City of Denton to Nerve a 61 acre mobile home pack on South Teasley Lane, Bob Nelson, Dictator of Utilities, ceported that the city was requiring this develoyment to install approximately 1 mile of is inch sewet line South of their pCopeCty. This would curve around the Corp property and thin into the Htakocy Cctek lift stAtion, Thar* Waco approximately 360 units in this development, Council Membec Stephens asked how this would affect the Wastewater treatment plant, Nelson ceepponded that the plant had the capability of handling Apocoximatily 90,000 population, Council Member Hopkins asked it this was the same mobile home subdivision which had put In the water line along Teasley Lane. Nelson respponded that that a inch line was finished, it was outside the city Mite, And would be charged 160% of city rates. Chew motion, Hopkins second to approve the agreement. Motion caccled unanimously. 13, The Council consideced apptoval of an ov4ralzinq agreement for Loop 288 Plaza Joint VentUte. Bob Nelson, Dirtotot of Utilities, reported that Plaxa Joint Venture planned to develop this property South of Audra Lane, This was an area in which the city planned to run a 20 inch line which would ultimately come (com the water plant to Highway 380. it was appropriate to oversize this line now from 9 inches to 20 Inches. The cost to the city would be appCOximately $21,700. McAdams motion, Stephens second to approve the ovoteiztnq agreement, The council than considered the teeord vote on the proposed tax Increase f0c fiscal year 1984-85 Which had been deferred earlier in the agenda, John MOotane, Director of Fina.nee, reported that the Council could set the tax rate at 59.50 pet $100 evaluation it would place the tax increase at 7,166% increase; 59.71l! per $100 evaluation would place the tax increase at 7,619%; 601E would place the increase over the 8% level. McAdams motion, Hopkins seoonu to Set the proposed tax Increase at 59.750 per $100 evaluation. On r611 call vote, McAdams laye,° Hopkins hays," Stephens "nay," Alford 'aye," Riddlespacgtr lays," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "nay." Motion carried 5 to 2 with Council Member Stephens and Mayor Stewart casting the nay votes. 14. There was no official action on Executive Session Items of legal matters, real estate, personnel, or board appointments, . 15. No items of new business were suggested for future agendas, M~itipa~c ~#Tepwotilkbot 1, 1941 Page Thirty The COUnoil then reconvened into the Ixloutive 106GLOn tO diaauea 1.1Q41 rattece, teal estate, personnel, and bard appolatmenae. No of total notion WAS taken, With no further items of business, the meeting was adSourned. R C 0 0. 8TM RT, MA OR OT R 4L , ctTY WRITAkV . 1539C CITY CUUNCIL A(;4NUA BACK-UP SUMMiARY SHEta'1' METING DATE: November 20, 1964 6U)3JECTi Approval of the preliminary plat of fumerican Stores Center, Lot 1, Block 1 SUMMARY: 't'ile preliminary plat is for 90,656 acres of land situated west of and abutting Geesling Road and ;jortn of and abutting U,8. Hwy 380 (University Drive)o This site is zoned light induet,:ial (LI) and a warehouse/distribution center type of development is anticipated. 't'here is need for a detention pond to be shown on the site, water and sewer lines are to be shown along the frontage of the property along Hwy 380. Telephone, electric, and solid waste disposal services and facilities are adequate and available.' ACTION REpUIREDi Approval or denial of preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat of American Stores Center, Lot 11 Block It with the condi- tion that all easements required for proper drainage be provided during the final platting phase, This would include the drainage facili- ties needed to transport both ofi'site and onsite drainage through the property to Highway 380. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approval of preliminary plat with or without condition 2. Denial of preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat ~a N_ , e~at._a Harm ry Wo persaudd Development Review Planner 04113 • ltl:r M IrIN ,1 1 11ILb1,1. R,114,191111.!RIy NIr4 M1aq nl,.e l~ 1 gel 1 11111 u 1 1 I <II '1 1 1' CCnI p, llw II Il 11 1 I l r' r 1 r 1 M1 I 1 I r r 11 11 I 1.'I Ill 1 r4'. i LI . 1 11, I I J I 1 LN LUVIN6 SURVEY ABSrRAC7 7N9 „ r AWRAcr 41? 1, I 1 k~r S,IVq NB L, M, fORRESt SU0 . loafs dORrCU \l Rdi w^1y RIO, M ~efN rll € fQ .'r • !J ,.r. y'J p~ j , r, t I t 1 u 1 f '.m' fup Pt ~Itl .p i{~ of ! r, ! li \~^,i tEA{I rrii rll 1 i,nu , 111 1 . ~r . 1E~4 ' ; i'S'`~,1 et ` •.r y \l\ SIM ~nIV- ililr i 11'VI I,' l 11 "f m ' i, 1. ~1" Pip 11i00 `~,f ,~Ai~\ 1 ~•k .~~e\ A.f r~/. .1 1.111 1 t OHEO (+O]I]f. l ~f+ !re'f 1 ' '1' 1 11 M t l'll '1 llul Invl.•. it I Il I 1,1 n 41 ~`Nrn~ ,t 1 J...... ! ( I .u , 1I , i A t J 1~ Y~ I 1 4 I NI I;.' , 0, N , n "I A 1 I v-.-.k•~ y `~Ik..j1 pp •1 ASQ0 .r 1 nm r r L ~ ~ C Ill Itar N MI ~ f .l ~^f 1 1 ~ .Ml 11 ! Y :1 1 1 ' ff 1 .IIh11 .1 I• '.1 1 1' 1 1 . 1 I 1, t 1 .1~ 111t1t11 ~p Mf I IY I IA t t, I rn a W tMl!M~l i It, 11 rl N r „ 1 I I r •e , . ~ I1 ^ ■ 1111. , V 1 ~ 1 II I , , t S r, b 'rl 1 1 1'.111 tErAS 1 t .r BLOCII~ L„_,,,. ~ + i ..1 I r 1 r 111 I i VICINITY A ;IS • i ' r III I,I \I l' -.if 1 . JI', . 1~ .Ilt. 4 ~1 1 ~ 111 ,.I 1p' , I ~ ' IF ll~l 1 r 1 1 M d fi'Ci - . h`. `$AM 11,1: + sugDIVISION V to a 13 aR sp 4t6I t r'I f0 n~• lA 1 I ' ' INI 1 f 1 I n 1. 1 .r . ~ t \ •"1.. tt,r ill'IS'r Q 10j1 ~ III • I ~ iw' NI I 1 r rv Ch'f 17 th`Jnr,. r 1, r,1 fft. l': ~ L: µllY wll I1 11IO '111 1. r , ` IR/Cf IN 7 ~ ; ~ f I + l~ ~ I' 1 ' rur I ' 1 \111.,1>t 1'1 0 19U 6l dd der ll wlI/I' ~ ftiftb' e 11. 1 .i It ` '/J.+ f ' ~i h•~ ; 1141 Ir . 5 Allot 1 tl 1+ ~t ~f ~ rl 111 1 fi wl h i ul a , r • +1a'• 1 r I 1 ,1~ 11 1 Irlln 1 ..r . G 14'"4' iir1111ii H1 i' ' ' . •_n 1 r: a 1 + Il + ~ U HgN;rN I!~' N leh uwrr. Ali I I r` Sy 1 1.,1 yl r• i I 1Y r ,I ~1 i ~ ~ ~ •I It1 1 1 2 .f f. :yrl I~9 1 .f l l l 1 r ho., w. Ir, a GRAPHIC SCALE I 1. 11 1 Il IN \ •I f+~e \ ,I 1,11 t \ OWNER, `i S' f i nl,i 1, a i11F 1 R1. p1 tt I 1, I'. RON 1 rl \ f d,l AMR CAM SISAES PROPERTY uNn N J ' M Isl Sgym fp?~1' SALT LANE G,v, UtAH 04II \V A~~l l!'441 (t r l l1 1 1 r . < S \nt~. IS Sr INN al lAllilu'Y r' I 1 ll f v ,,~~jj , ' .;fC. dGRICUt.~1kll n ~f .1 , f .'1+7/ r Iiy r f K r !'-'~-r a.Sl' r .1 J . 11,1 I f .r 1, 'I l 'r r ' . _r v n ''f' t I 1. tt9 r . .r'-!• /k' 11 ,I, w < Ir Ih l CpN Irf RCId L. \ \J 1 - r (1 ale I1 r: rl t: fbn • Ir .$.y7eJ ly ...f _.fI` a.f~ ~ Z e1'SI 1i Ypk ~~•-•-d••-N\yp M ` Ht lf4V l N76H0.TAY•-J-( ._...u;„ 1' fitJ . r 1 e 4. r 1 - II 1. 1 l `r 1 tt).~ ,1 l 1,/ "nwa l•1•ry 111/ rrd/ff.IOV ,p11' III rl.. II to F t l . . "'lIIC 11 dORlCULlURAL IONl.P . NUlkr,r ll, 110,6•f6 V i k RscelWINNo'( i PRELIMINARY FLAT a sT _ owN sdnoNn sftlt 1'.200' Ha04KNifT H2A ITUR ~1\CC'Iw AMiREN STORES CENTER cY CITY COUNCIL AQ%NDA DAMUR ii.UMMBY1HUT MEETINQ DATE: November 20, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Carroll Point Addition, Block l SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0,4125 acres situated east of and abutting Carroll Boulevard and west of Fort Worth Drive, The site is zoned office district (0) and office development is anticipated. Water, sewer, electric, telephone and solid waste disposal services are available and adequate, There Is an existing fire flow of 800 g,p4m, whereas office development requires a minimum of 1500 g,p,m, There is need for a fire flow test to determine if the water flow will need upgrading, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoningg Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat of the Carroll Point Addition, Block 1. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat Harry W. Persaud Development Review Planner 0420] lot, \ \ 1 fa1V1111`411I6114I AW .`7 lOG1t ON V O ffV4lfhq IcLf I+ ilJfl LOT I f , tooo 14 1 q 1 d'. CO e 4 it t 12703' ~ rrltc+. er.i t ! e r o Lal , F ' co LrttaA, lot 44W.1VA(Nl trAir If HGtf! t tIV/W;o"t rA14U 1*6* L07 2 IOMINR41W4 x~Itvrv e. ,a~ SAI~QCK I mill 4 5x'4K7 1c na7 \ outs --:-f:~:s►,,,,,.:.-.~:-- r / 3, \ m:, c,aA ao•ru 70, ~ t7ten I I tM ALAI 4441 L~ •,t' ' fA1 C h fA• / r' N 1 , i J e/ Q ~ OWNER _ rom TlI otEY fO boo 1442 rnf Ll MINARY el A7 DENtON, TX I6P01 CARROLL POINT ADDITION} LOT 2 8LOCK I 0AM5 At. ALCUNDL4R WILL SUKVEV A•623 CRY C COUNNO' MAIM 1, tPI(Mi 4'.1 F CRG'.~ P. t7,I7 Act, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACKA P SUMMARY SHEET MEETING DATE, November 20, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Cimarron Addition, Blocks A and a SUMMARY; This is a tract of 15.75 acres situated s;;uth of and abutting Audr.a Lane and west of Loop 288, This site is zoned planned development district (PD-83) for mixed residential development comprised of multi-family (MF-R), two family (2-F), and single family (SP-6). The existing fire flow is equal to 650 g,p%m Whereas multi-family development' requires a minimum of 750 g,p,m. A fire flow test Will be required to determine the exact flow on the site, Bower service is adequate and available. Telephone service is available, brat there is need for an 8 foot wide utility easement to be provided at the rear of the lot and along the east property boundary for service to the multi- family development. Gas service is available from Audra Lane. ACTION REQUIRM D: Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat of the Cimarron Addition, Blocks A and B. A[,TERNA'CIVES: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat Harry 14, Pereaud Development Review planner 0418] -fL t A 11 ~~J T SlI ; Wn I __11 . ~ e, ~ wr.. Pllfo Ml)i M ~oo11411 ref ' _ ~ 9 ~.._...f-- )7 1 1 'Oi<J BLIP • _~s._._;~ a ~ fe ~ Y L r_ov o - _ * - r = NOTC' MASTCR DRAINAOC PLAN SHOws 11, d A t YJa W y FOK A I ATHI$ AC.A UrCN S1rt \%-AS USED FOR CNTIRC ROIXTC 46t0.~ FLOWS IN77v5 gRELLNIN44v ORA NA'gC 9 UP) N 7. o f I11 O N'a~ w N rprr .1 p J / o~r7A u j - I . r r•ul T,a.r-;.-~'si~;eTT-:rofn rH.,..el I I - t~. _ ~t . • ~omfrt fur alt slum er _to._'..._~__.. is L4 J i F ,'10~ R/ a#- - t o fl f I u - S 7 I N lU 7 I-'7S r} ,7 el r a. tr t r A i t a I IMr prI H 41L/ f •l • 1) Art is "1 t f r l / .0 / S F 8 Y F i~ ur 29 14 IT 5I0' W■{C{IY{DOCi { f l)r•!r I'r100• n s~ < c v 1. Y u n t , S o N t Ittl. irniMAAv eu~wAS, nu otvc)ort CIMARRON ADDITION - --rTrrrM„rAe1 to ni•e nr WESTO~N Hb,NE9 Uu~RR04 ADDrt ION A 4 D 4x0 9 h,ROU MPfI )oc .KS su CFd C, '09,~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP P $VMMARY $H%RT MEETING DATE: November 20, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval Of site plan amendment for B-154 (Country View Mobile Home Park) SUMMARY: This 13,7 acre tract located at 2800 Fort Worth Drive is zoned light industrial with a specific use permit for a mobile home park. The specific use permit authorizes the development of 150 mobile home lots. Seventy-seven (77) lots are currently existing and the owner now sneks site plan approval for forty-one (41) addit'-zonal lots, ACTION REQUIRRO= Approval of the site plan RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the site plan, A[,TFRNATIVE: Approve site plan ATTACHMENT ; 1 Site plan for additional mobile homy, units., nenise Spive Development Review Planner 0878g - - ~fi rPU^~! annl„J, ,WA~~~.__...•-__,T``, 'kit to, . p C n„1♦ IM ~ ~ E i y O J9a! I i" I Yw ♦ , ' I 1 • fl,O In}f\q lAJIC KVC tear C 1w` `'t~S::'.A216 t.J ,k411 iII I K, _ T . .-f--'-•-'- i-_._ abumfllY VICW CIRCL[.. I I u-tft "s` .1 1`\~i.°`-s,---1_:.`1 ~ qan ✓I _ ! ~ 0 1 IF 1 fw! 11 1 \ \I `I 1 7 p, Hr, ;CY~~~. 1'1 f`.~~ - _ - ~ 71 n C!~wrr\ _ _ ~1 1//j-. -e_. _ \L1 \`J'hMrwP 11 \~J'rM:f raw iwr.. ..J •t 1~')1-. ♦ ~~If 7T ~ •r , PY^•r l~ 1 !.4 ~ s...._sasa,u_,aan_ru.ns_____+. ..~.1~i~elu._. r > I rr nr .l f _ _ _r 1r _ 1 ~ ~Tr-.♦~•;+LTY1n1rf..-T t' _ ,I~..... _rq~f ~ CWMt NY _YICM (AaH. tCaeaitlP ro 11n SITE AMEN4ME SC04PI A•4 rr _ sc 1. I CITY COUWL AGEND4 CX ' MEETING DATE; November 20, 1984 SUBJECT, Approval of the preliminary plat of Country View Mobile Home Park SUMMARY; This is a tract of 13,738 acres situated west of and abutting Fort Worth Drive (U.S. Hwy 77) and east of T&P railway, The development of this site has been approved for 150 mobile home units by specific use permit (8-154). There are 77 mobile units existing on the site and the developer is proposing to add another 41 units making a total lie units. The drainage channel is to be concrete lined for the 10 year storm. Electric service is available, The developer will need to install conduits at his expense, Water, sewer and telephone service and facilities are adequate and available, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat of Country View Mobile Home Park. AI.,TKRUATIVES; Approval or denial of preliminary plat A'ITACHM~:NT, Reduced plat Harry . Persaud Development Review Planner 05048 i I FRANK 94, 11 •'AK (Xvi ISO ttA4 .1'1 PVAL A., r a W 14 N! r / t S `A 114 rwo,gt Ntv ACCtt6 L.UtYINt ` vo, r$04 0Neii 1 to t r yb .tip y Q t ! A ,r1'/'?w a ~ISt, I;[ bd~A n It pt )rAtlp4 1 I !v... •'1rpovn St bl ,ed ,A- tMl •n u, 11 1'a, w•t , YAI 414 P/ SOt VI, JACK BELL 00091 CO ~fgt r PRELIMINARY PLAT COUNTRY VIEW MOBILE HOME PARK I) 7 )B at t. 1 ASA HICKMAN 9URVCY ASdt 11 " ' CITY OF bEN70N, COUNTY OF OFNTON, TEXAS ,•I 2011I140 11 -SUP All H , J, r+r-;, I A dd. , ,`~f IQ 1 PF1f1CG',~ L. >L, LOCATION 1 MAP 41Uon • IbnA,u l"i It- C,n,1 FI,t.,, PRELIMINARY In W, Vnttli 11 1-1 PLAT Intro, r1l„ 7 CITY COUNC14 ApNNDA ' K ~1 R,CK-UP S RY BUT MEETING DATE; November 20, 1984 SUBJECT; Approval of the preliminary and final replat of the J,W, Erwin Subdivision, Got 2R and 3R, Block 1 SUMMARY; This is a tract of 3,525 acres situated south of 1-35E and west of Gillian Miller Parkway and being a replat of Got 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, J.W, Erwin Subdivision. The site is zoned commercial (C) and commercial type development is anticipated. There is need for a 101, diameter sewer line to be extended along the frontage of the property along Gillian Miller Parkway. Water, telephone, electric, and solid waste disposal services and facilities are adequate and available, ACTION PXQUTRED; Approval of preliminary and final replat RECOMMKNI)ATTON; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary and final replat of the J.W. Erwin Subdivision. ALTERNATIVES; Approval or denial of the preliminary and final replat ATTACHMENT'S; Reduced preliminary and final replat ~,}-Qf~t tlV N Harry Pereaud Development Review Planner o426J IIIW 11 off Iavlo S.IUf .L la., • - coN~aY I~P1f•f _n,.JJ ~ sral:~er ;./~Yd1•e JY ; .ter' 7 y:, ~ ~ .Y"_ rrJ. i 1111 i 1tii. .Ywa. I~ t i--• -.~_,11--- /4l y J(~ )f ' `L' rall"AA ei+N r Jtca ~c ~1~ I.... Ijl IrNmaV •Vt Jrvp J'~.Y , ,7 ~i' /1 JW f /MI MJ M~ vti rert III ` ~tG/~~t~ „et I r lt..eJ ~N..-_. 1 S/ 1 JJJJ LAC/~L. ZIP, Ad e 0, 1 / 1,~~'-\ j1 _ r ..~1 r-+••~1 a... Y- !L`~ II II a Inlfl ~NI I.I JIN II. <NYN I«W. WII.NY MIN f ~J i1..y1 111 IY N♦ I LIN. 11111.+ 4 w.. 111 / N / IM.I IININ IIN Y \rl M 11 .1 14 1,1' 1 \4\ ,.NN ~ IJIY I1y IJ Nllll. W 1\I 11 IY•1 Mlll N 41.11 r \ % I or 1 GL WNS N \Y 114YI, W ICI 1SI♦ IIII 1414 4 1 TI I~ \NI INVN NN N N. y~11~ y„iil•~ ~ + e/ ~"f~-...-'-~ l J ` . ' (S~ Nt" a Nut <eunT N NJNM 1 V ✓ K 'N lrl7 Iyty .L W YMNNW 1441111. 1 .1 rl Mlw N W _j' _ 1 - • :aL _ - ~ 111 NN NYII W MIII, II 1111 IN Nl Wlll 11r1vN IIJI N r Iw W 1111. w« I Y IM NN.w~M.w w N ~JLLId/17 MIS NNI. N, INN 11 N 11 N I4 q N' /Ild I, ` p INMIIW IN 4111114 I Ili r•NI W 1~ W -=M`-alwr - J t~'' t~/'J / / wl 4 IINNM IN 11.1 NI IN MI ^1 r/// I4HN HN.NN 11 11 17411 1 4114 14IN. •INI NW N W NI IW N NI1,4 N NN w NI ` ~ Qhk4y pruevr cure 1bv/e fiLlYtlJ \ ryih r1j7J!•fY.N.II A7/K IfIN N IIRI I ) t; )}J] t01VN 11 NYW / 'ITe% N e''H'/ . N N MIKA, 11WY11 IuN Ell "=VIA 01.10 JI 1 LMM 1111 N N 1W, 111 y1I1. / LI NI IJ' N. IIi, SLAIN 111111 ~I~A~ 141 M1lY ~411 I I UUA: W {{TJL!(SI w I.14lii Iifl4y1wa1N I II la i'l1IIN «S N IM NN 111, S fNWI 1S S 111 b..I. NINIWWWWWMI I A,NH Hfl'1 . HIJ T N NY NI11 JJN • W 1, IINI 1 Y J. Y. YN 171 IN pl Poor=, Y.IM MII Ib N NRM11 11 fYr•W IIM ~11 UN11 W ~Si N blw. INS 1(_IN N1J~ 11lIIYI IWI NIA WNVN, IN NIW li•N INI fIN IN IM •1 41141 U. IIN, I 1"11111 I. «IM lf1 1• INIy~ly IN WNI ~N1IIW 1, 11 . IIY y~ NX111 Ww11f NII I1M1 I 1r 414 • t 1 IA}'{ 1 f li lr• Yr11 I.N ,NIN <I We off I y1W M+1 N 1 1 11 IMP I. Y.11 4yT 11944 11 IwtIN 11Y MuN 9r2 W 141 NIIN' /151114 k, I NI4 111 N NM. liN NOM ~ NIN w w Nlw 11 i.llf IYfL/H/NA.~y f'SIIW W *":4.o" WnIIN SIS~' Ji::1N NI IIS'I .11 J IN11 W ,~IYw1 444 j V•Nr w rr.IW 1 1.11/ N. .l N NIIM' 45!. NO PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION Uhl Ill 1Y 411 11 % Au " PIT Zor 3Q, aZOCK / "'«iul« lif ii. ii 1«i i11i`;1, IS" lot aw i NI WITHIN THE I00 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AS DflSIOHATED for PR Illlu•.1 «,1w N IIIIIYIJU~•1nfIN 1 .NI fIN1 IIIriP'lll~t~ SY THE P.E.M.A. FLOOD PLAIN MAPS, H! CORN'/rY SUQD 1 IIJi1V I #4loI .v 1Y-ucJ 4o` 'A'S 1M«$~ 1I41"IS 1116~t~' NN,I 14 it 41111 YIIII NW NIi 1/11111 N 011111Y I - $1.%1 II IM1III,S IIMIIINI INI 41 II NM LL11-.J 11th 'YfL.n f4U0 «111 SI tY INI I4N1N N NlN•~%~ 11NIi 111, NN yy~yyl N. IN INNNINI NIN" NII11 I. W IN 4-10 a.nll J\ rwl /YrbyYn IYi H'. 111!t1[r NorSl, bNI «Y 711111 11 N II N IIyII INfIH N w1i1/ IM~ rlM11i1MyNIM 1NI1N~yA 11 111. W IAN' h1 Ip "V,It $ rJ Hr I 31t N. WINNII 111 N IWIMINII 4414 11'Nl4 NNJN 111 111W I'+ Nt NDID Iwo", M,ll 1 N' 11' 11' I, 1111 YN ILM 1111 NNI11. 11 INIIW IN 'r "m NNINIIIINI 14411 111441. JN 11 IM CIID ItN1K.~l. Mn'1 qfU YY C'J IY 0I 01,4'YJ.v OLr.'asr COw•r rr111 yll.I IIY~I aIm 11 11'~S•I111" 41111111Pool. IN No MI 11414 0.4 I'm PI 1 1111, IJ 11 II rM II11N PIP 1,ohlll Ip -.It1 or IVMIhniMli,lliNlili lltlt'I1"ISr'1 iNIM BSI Mill", I" N will 111 IN IN II W t IYN NNIN 111' 1 ' 11' Y, IM.1 MI 1• NIIN NI, ILA LLNNN N p.; rDA1R IIIi OMH I M' /1' NIW1 • 4.11 fw N IIN 1J1 lY I,.,M'YI/I'lia .I 41 s1 NNI li Nfr J. .,'Yx 411 R~dn a kYa t SN IMeI I N' u' r. IIM IMI lW uu u1 1' 15N fNl a Q~'hI~D(CfIDY}. ><f' If./ML [ea~.u aJ /I 1 t1/111, AI/I .N•'I 141'44J Ifi73/I-N / rAWde 'Y, u IIN rN I IM WIMw ..w 11 N1Y MIYI 1 N• I1' N' 4 I41N NH 1111. 1111 NNl L J.W OM DOWMI Jrol JAW MI' ,Lp WIU~ AMMOCIAT4(Lr ISO. •1111 wINl11N, 1I'111141 N IN.11 SNl N NI kN/ N Jwrl A'1 r1V/ •Wln, YII/( (/LIE ANI13, rffAl I1r1f 'r eq. IH„J 1 INIRIN W W11111N L1111 .11N N IW. f1/II , 1411, nlN.J/IV 101 ._..21:'.'_.1 S.C'. tY✓•IWIYAYY~ ` II h. ~t . CO/VlY4Y enr :if/J7 srRc1'Cfr , Fkatt el' -lot ' n e' eJ Ys Jr Nr 4 _ _ J~ ~ e.• w1.. ,ti? II •I 1. HNaa •-lor J11" 1~.ili -tot to r''~! M f I~ J 1 • • / 1 101 /J . I'e a:u;:: ::(finl!L~:.:. l1.1111. 111HI 1111. JK. fYNYa.J.q +LN J.a1. 1 u Nrr •1 l4 04111 N f. N.. 404 IINiN + Nu+l I IM II II N. flo. N YHUI M11,NVJ N; IN 1w1IrWW11N IM • 111 I.t L •I! !J~ C~ IM1 I41NM I.i I~N1' IN 14l'1~11~N'I,INIM.'ll ,I~~.1~ ;I1 'r Jti 1a.a YN Yt N. 11 .1 lW WI "f:-(Y4{flt-11111irllf Wiy. 10n11A L.....~I \i f yV iN 1e.0e b rJ « I fIIRIn 11 0411. F. 1a1 Ij1 ti` . V 11 1.104.. ~#,W IIINe ItY b 11 i ,~I,J7 • ~ " b' % mnr 4 1 n uwr - 3y IlhFnll I4 e FIlIllYlllrll'NIMYIIIJ M.rY1N' u r,,,J 1. INIIs11. 1. H II 1.I IhrW Htlru 14w1 Y N 414 • Ln.4 ~a.lY J ',v 111 :1 1. I; IJNIIYN 1 tN Ip 11rY NIl1 J+«I W Nln.'~.IIN 1. N ~`'I•h 1It, I LL 4 .104«04 :4 41 1« I4 Nr/nN1 IM lu.llw i Jn•~''{f l 11 Iq IN NNI«H 1 1 I~ IN HNIIII I411u NHH fell A, Ili •-10 •1 IINt Ir 41 r11y11 Nr f1Y. a1 Nllll Nlt IN _•„~4r 4k I J i' p nltvc ~lx N - WY crrrrlrrrr.-ayr1->R<rr- ,I .`Tr 1 n' jl i,r~lr'JJ'1'1 INU 11' I I ~ (1•"1P/'b B'I .114 • 11 1141\ 41« 1 .r..N N 1+1 s+-r .I + 1.'•1' al Hrlnl. INNI 41fi lar nJru ~'.J11 W 111]111,1 I.oHI 1.• J +H•11 11111 L1H„11+r11 II Y+1n11•~~~- + •x.111 . J.~1. II r.Y ~HIr111.Y It i+ + rol w. Iy. N UH 1,01 In ry1,1 PI. q r aid ..v 11N11I fill 1nl.lelll. III I, 111, INI le.~rll tf • n I•n ll~ 1111.. IJ lllltit ri.llt .H.1 1.11 .11f~FIN - 11111„•.1111 IM11. IldH l1 IJIN 1. I. 11 I. IN.III,1+. .,Y tr1 J Ivw FII b W11 N; FU'N. Na 1 Onl MI, IIP:1..1 " KAIJ p rl dNY', l1, 1... NIN JIN I'll 0411 4NIYIIl 1 U1N111W 04.04111 11 U111 W 41 II 1111 lH~ III II FI•NI Ni III. 11 NeIIH II M.IJI 41, 1'1 IN 11.111 IN "IN 1 :::M N [II 1 d.I . Nea I. 111 H111N11. H t H sI+N 1 1 . 4 NIMI I NII JI 1 11 11+.1 1 +1 wN 1. t. IIYII 1•\III IIIN 1 1~ !IN Hlllli fli 1 04.1 NIYN IMHHI 11 l~ H1N 11 NI«Ni IN Y411 W+. 41w1 NI Nrl NIN IN ...Poe I I ♦11~11 HlW NI1 111111. b1 1 lu 16 IMI. I1 .1 Z. t+ Ilrl. .111 I.1 b~ NI«H a 141 1Nrn LN11141f11M 04104 Pw. / F,ifYC 971 Qf/y •1 r. nNM N 1 .ew„ W IuN Y1111.111 040411111 . I.II HI 111. .1 1.11 W 1 I LOr 2a L'l ZOr le, ,9100.K 1a.9 ..Y 11' IP I. 111 14 IN I Ip U,UN1.Nf INi 111N.nu1141NIe1 111 IN 1i4 Y11M11 fill/'/~1M c aoll,l( SASa. I ,Il.o 1»a N 1Y1 ba M1 1 Ndb ; 1 ll IN 111' 11' 11' 1.. H.N N 'full I r I , 71;L 1.l ULN 'i.~ 1 1 Is11~ lit 411 IIN H bl rMfl ar If.ar JIIII l Ie 11- v 4V•nwl Avl ,IUY 1. 1. v. Iral I'M I.,IN. Nll IN NN WM W I I ! J e6rr • I HV1 Aie e('a1Y n'IwM1 II11JH• n .NU 1•Yli ♦f 1 f.~ n INl er11111 • JeM Np 111. IN WN11.111 INI MITI 1. tH 111 If 1r'1 w I., Ibllry 11 W IFI IIro11H N W. ~I. Ill 11~4 M1H 1M IN N IIII IYI 0410404'11 041111 l~ Iq~ 11 P1NIN. L.M M III eJ rlYr Kra+r '1111 Jl H,w u«II. M1411 1. ~11 H IN MIM MeM .Mr11 IY~N11N1 IL I4 NI1p II JltOldlO n' tAwN! Wi 11! IIV 041 NWNIIH N N 141 N IIMIH IM YW 11 IIIt •I 1. All. I' 11' I, II. 1111 IlN 411 Ildl 1i IIHNrI I4 111lyy W 11N1NIIIIJN 1041111 11 041104, 4 O 11 Hilo IlMlet Nr!}h\Ol •!!II N~ t 111 11.1 0 1111 " I 1i111'I NN 1.1111~,~1111p1r1 Iy«III 10411.1. MI a+ I Ill.11. iI N UI111N Nlu Hl" N+. .1 w1 IN lal ar dnN rul 1r _NI 01 C.rI eL btN/ov J<. ^s.. MN I,. •1Jf 1 un. J 411 fWN le IM 11. 1 1'. JIH'M 1111 Ili, ll f11 (nu I ..Mw ',~'il lL4 x'111. le,r 11 l l~I11l l l~l • ll' t.'IM~111,N1 If IrY II•. 0411... 1111y Nr+1' Imlitr/1I/Rt'n1Lrr.V'Q i.7lZt•Vrl"- ?f-cell NeN feel I N' N' t1 1114 N. .1 L11 bH N 1Y 11u 1`II IN 11 Itl IIU 11 lei , Ila1Y 1. Hl 1. I. Ir Y. I+IJ 10411 1041 If r}..1 f' I'll' IN , IHI 4.04 I H MIA 41 <1 1fLN fH1 ~'1 ,'Ml-TL Jv_fl JJal nNr\Je Jr Mu 1 N' 4 bN 14 YNMN lrwl 11 411 ul r 1 I W111v. M1-ITI .Hnr !/.Y!vf1 SIdG•il J t1N<.4n fill CMM141 IMI JfUH hY WI[M1 .f4fltl OINl~1 fNO. Idr • Jn' al' U' r, II 104 404 NN ' 411111.1 I. 1.1 JNII IH IC Ir rw~. 'LU ~rla M111111Y1 1IIUNl N IM,p II II Ik 'O d 1W1 !<nU M1 1 1a+1«IYI e.NUUIN 1.1111 .141 e1iW1.. 11111 INN. IIrb IU I/ ~11 14'111 Pit •i - . r r 1 v ...I~'•f•,C+-tI••aM~I.~YLYRI-!I~e+•a•+~++-•n-...~~~~ a C; CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY `SHEET MEETING DATE t November 20, 1964 SUBJEC'Ps Approval of the final replat o1 the Milton Court Addition, Block 1, Lot 1 SUMMAKYs This is a tract of 0.4 acres of land situated east of anti abutting Normal Street and north of West Oak Street. The site is adequately served with water and sewer facilities. Electric service is avail- able. Access is to be allowed on Normal St. All existing streets meet city requirements. The site is zoned for multi-family (MF-1) and a 17 unit efficiency development is anticipated. ACTION REQUIREDs Approval of final replat RECOMMENUATIUNs The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of the final replat of Milton Court Addition, Block 11 Lot 1. AbT8,RNA`PIVESs Approval or denial of the final replat A` TAC:HMSNTS s Reduced final replat Harry N. Persaud Development Review Planner Nang"" -Monopmommom A006rw OtArDON ik f A00«w 0 M NORMAL srotrET O C r'1 w0ATw irr 1$' ~ n oofo foo' ; r 07 O r0 ti04 O O S ~ ~ Jr Jr y Q o•o ` a rJrt fJ ~ ~ e 6, A n a • N 1 r,.<1 ) 0114 W . i 11,1 ` 111 y s 00,01'so• t r0O Jo' .44h0 Ie0 . Yfi AN 1 ~ ~i!' e a Iq li J y y i ~ 11 q 6 9 S ! .1e i:i I• p) > ; :ilk 7' ------•---r-~ 3 ' i " t ~ u ~ i ~ i { , ~ ~ ~ i : ? S ~ 7 ~ Sa ~ ` f i ~ i 41 m ! •ian`/ I~ i 7=e < ire rs~ 3 ! e: 41 1r , a'1 ' 7 . 9 , i• • 1 S r, • it , i i {M of y i i r yr) t= f, i n j s 6 ; 04 _ H'G ~o7Y~r fir{ i r'~• 1. f' ".L 1 ~qY s i•r i ; y 10 2 G,4,2 Nme 't Z k f 2, i i t =J may` f' 1: `i srl i [ •.i i is a •t ~N, W O O • 1 • 1 v x P ~ n k~L'1'Y CUUNCIL AUENWA JACK-UP SUMMARY SHEE'L' MEE'L'iNU DATE: November 20, 1984 SUBJECTi Approval of the preliminary plat of the Paisley Street Addition, block 1 SUMMARYi This is a tract of 0.344 acres situated south of and abutting Paisley Street and west of and abutting Ruddell Street and more fully described as Lots 1 and 21 t3lock 1, Johnathan Brock Surv?y Abstract Number A-55. 'i'he site is zoned single family (Sr'-7) and the iurlose of the geliminary pint is to establish two single family lots. Waterf sewer, electrical, telephoner and solid waste facilities and services are adequate and available. An additional 5 teet of right-ot-way is required along Paisley Street, Perimeter street paving is required along Paisley anu Ruddell streets. ACT10N REUU1REUc Approval of the preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: '1'ne Planning and Zoning Commission r.econuaends approval of the preliminary plat of the Paisley Street Addition, block 11 with the condition that an additional rive (5) feet of right--uL-way be provided along Paisley Street which teas uean designated as a collector street on the Uenton Thoroughfare Plan, AL'TERNATIVESI Approval or denial of the preliminary plat A'T'TACHMENTi keduced preliminary plat Harry Persaud ~~-G - Uevelopnent Review Planner U421j 11j 1 I' i 1 Y 1,.fhS, rl P~~~ ~u PAlS~[Y Sr 11 i~ 1 1 r\ 1 t I ( S:y ~ l 1.•I Ulr pf flY1V110'(4N\N Ul ~1 d•.. 1 MRf PIID Il• NIR l01'1 ( Lot 2 + 4 e ocx mu y I 0.11t k- I,- Gill Ac. ,1 1 3$ I Pnlsl.[v srn[[r naalr;onl AIOC.K ONC ( ~ ;tlCUtt[6Ci:~ rl P\ A IRADCII[ 11111!e, fI,M Ait CITY COUNCIL AGENDA A&M-MR UWARY 13HEET MEETING DATE: November; 20, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of the Sun Valley Addition, Block A, Lot 13 SUMMARY: The final xeplat is for a tract of 0,665 acres of land situated south of and abutting Hercules Latie and west of Stuart (toad, The site is within the existing general retail district and a day care center development is anticipated. Electric service is available from the existing facilities. Water and sewer services and facilities are adequate and available. Gas, telephone and solid waste services are also available. The final replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. AC'T'ION REQUIRRG: Approval of final replat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval of the final replat of W.n Valley Addition, Block A, Lot 13, ALTkRNATIVES: Approval of final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced replat Harry N. Persaud Development Review P?,anner 0414] ' >NII it 1111+ A ` NN N'I nr a1pI ~V. i 1 Nf.lik'ILES 1.ANE L• 1x1 :re re : ' blc t'Irp b h.. N1V. :vl 1-~t'. u.V F I. _ ILDIr I.llhr'•1'a.: \\I.•, 11 M1'Nfl 1111( iN 1N1 I ~ I `I • 1189'25'09 14776 • 7SN hl: ~a_S.r. inl... u:eD HIM v W. s# it"i 41 I Ml Eil 111 U'.N*1I-Ih• v Pn9~ INI, NL1 41.N n..N, l• , 111,1. nl. 1' AV •v - pa ' I OIIN<I MYi. NI U1r • Al.l It f:T \I'M1 iM 1 .1U ' IW IIII . V!1. fl vYw I 1 ~ lIL:N rll• 1. I - LOT 13 441 1¢ N rq tNU, 11. L:• hht h.I' \1,5.'!1 M}L,a lI1 V. !III 4!11 ~ ya; n BLOCK 4 $Uil/dLLE'r AC'OIION txl 111. 1'A X11 NLR1r "11 NIP I.•:6_ r,1-I I Pi fl $1:b,-n, 011x11. Ih4N1 r,. Y"n Nv.•.N, 0 6550 Ar, vol 2,Pq MP R r•.c .I ' S.'1 L LF r T101 L.V ~ihlr 910th d ~ PG I IHp rr 111V . ,N ~a I IJ!}4.11 IV I'\ 1 O 1 p II hN rl. , tp O0 IN. .1.1. ' '.1. O ulal Y ¢:1 ~o vir ; .11,. 1A , e I,: ALLEY ~ i., era I :1. : 6 9 9 . .1L .'v (I r01EL ARJ.IIe I CATS I. 1106EAS•fh1 OOHoINI u rANPLC..P11 LL`AtE (W-CE-4 "I SUN YALLEY ADC111011, f1rS1 SeCt4m BLOCK A rl ~ 'ahr c ! E... • 4. 1, 1'CV11 I ,Nd L L Id f L :.K ....If N'.IP 4L1\ .1 4 16 r ~ r 1 FINAL 1~ ~~'l R lat of Sltl'J VAL~.Et 11 II o,1 'n s h t stau rr, lfUfi.11M1C'GV~; V L e V e 2P 1 c .c, ,I. l 111c1arr np f, c, IaVF"YOh^, f? tli f,, CRf\ .UR1 1 Ar CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-up 9U RY ffl= MKETtNa DATE: November 20, 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the Ke180e Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 SUMMARY: This is a tract Of 1.409 acres situated east Of and abutting Bell Avenue at the bell Avenue and Mingo Road intersection and more fully described as Lot 1, Block 1, BRE & CRR Survey, Abstract Number 165 City of Denton. The site is zoned light industrial (161) and retail type devolop- ment is anticipated. Water, sewer, electric, telephone, and solid waste services and facilities are adequate and available, The preliminary plat oonforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of preliminary plat RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat of the Kelsoe Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. ALTHRNATIVSS: Approval or denial of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat ~l- Harry ON. Persaud Development Review Planner 0879g ~y YY dll Y OF OCNION, F0 3 m ~ _-_._r... _-:I.-...-affil... lm _:4...___..--..-.-_ n~ r FI _ - ---iC- - B-Ek-t- ~ - ~ -Y-----A VT ht11 V- 63 x > Y-- _ ins ~ _ N ~ 0 ~ J I'_ kl W- Y + y JIrLLLe ' ~ 1+ SI~fC'~ ~ ~ C2 - 1 ~ .a a Y y : o d r r '~!1 " p ~ o Cl -A Y ~ trek ! , • ~ l \ `a V`,~ t~~J, Jar, ~ ~5. ..._'~jT ~pv Y 1 h~ PI I \ Z n a I I N c t E• M G S , f J l l t o ~ 3 1 i S t o + j ~'i • Y , i~: ia~t{ ; a ~a' Y.,.t ~ ~ i~x G~ ;.,i~~ ai f~~. n,'r~J ~?a w• .IF I~ ~c (1ITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-U SUMMARY MEETING DATE! November 201 1984 SUBJECT: Approval of the site plan and final replat of [got 4C, Slack A, Township II, Phase It SOMMARYt This is a tract of 1.401 acres situated east of Dallas Drive and north of the I-35E and Dallas Drive intereeotior,e, The use of this site has been approved urn-4er planned development (PD-6) for commercial purposes and a plant nursery development is anticipated. Water, eewer, telephone, electrio, and solid waste disposal services and facilities are ads- quate and available. Access will be allowed on Dallas Drive, The proposed building coverage, front, rear and side yard set-backs, and off- street parking provisions are adequate, The final plat and site plan conform to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulation. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of site plan and final replat the Zoning Commission sand n final recommends RECOMMENDATION: tThe Planning he approval of and A14TERNATIVES: Approval or denial of site plan and final replat ATTACHMENTS,. Reduced site plan and final replat Harry . Persaud Development Review Planner 0425] [(\yll+f i ~ ~ l MIS.` / a~ ~ CI IS cij !j - _ I `1 ._~.......4~.4 I ral....a.~u a.=~.....~r.u~_....~d...l..a ' - ' 1 r 4 11 ILllr Ll• I ' 1'NUr ry IJlln I slue PINI!• P. a IU lr. rrn •1 •I w... III.• r• N~~ 1r111 N VT I E. 1'1 1 ^.v 1111 I'. 11 i E I•l Ilr•1111 M1111. f1 1. 1 I. X1111 IIM•• li rlN l'I1 t Illr Ili'^ 1J.lN ll 11 Irl r 11,• NY N IJ14• 111• ' 1 Ia'. r Mlr lri 'Rllr'Y1 , I. 1•' I,1 II YI 11111u'll. •1•I'I r 11 11.11 Ilr.r E4N 1. 111'11111 1.1.11 I.N f1~141.11~11.1 M r Iul )1 111 M1NN 11r IN'1 1111• lll'1 Ill ll llrl 1111 \11.1 r1 I r 1'.•1111' 11•Yll 1' l rl' ~11 rrIH 111 1 111 INI I I I.. ~•IA~.I Ir • 11P 1r1 11 E111111•11r 1.1 y1. 11 'Il l' ul I' I.1 TI•I • 111111 IUrilir •It 4.. •11. 11 N••IU. 1 , 1.. 1.1 11 II 11'wl 1 11.1 1. M.A 1 IINI... I. lrW 1 NII ♦ r NY 111 11 •u11 1111.11 EI W1111111 •tN eY 1 1'. 11111111 •r• l I E. 141 11 M11111 •1••1111` N • 111 II 1411 11 1 \I 41 Y INr 1 I• 1 I Wu1w•11 II N11U Illll l~llnl '1'. IY 1111N •r 1.. I N1• I Vll II I11W1 •I lrll ; 11 • 1••.1.1 I.1 1 rrl r•... 1 Nllu IN41 r tyY\:1 Nr111111111~ 1111 '1`. 1.1 r' 1. IlIN11111.11111 IIJI IINI Imo, Irr41W. r ll vl •11.1 1 1.1 11r1 IYRI 111• N11111~11 111YI~ •II Y• Irrl1..'r 11 411N111 • IW 11 • 1•ul Iyr.1141uIVnleuvW •aJN Iwll 11 YIrMI 11 •JIIN 411. •1 11 •1 IM- I. 1 1 1 11• IN. r. 1 _ I 11111 11 IIIIVI 11 \1111N 11 I II 11.' I 1. 1 i • 1' Iv I1 J1111 MIIU 14 u. MI 11111. •.N I.!II NIIlN 11 IV V11 'OII IU 11 • IN• I111N < 1 ♦ 11 14j I. • IU! 111WU. 14'. 1 V1 Yr 1111 11. 11N 11'IIr N.••I 111 1 1 1 111 1 1 f \ I1. 1.11A,1 411 1141 1111 le J11_Ilp1 IN 1r1u1 1 •r~ N+Ir IIIY •I ItII I Y1t. l\11, 11•,It •I~r 1111. •'1 II '.•IW It 11' 1 C~ 1 ~ IJ 1 c E31neA \ /j u1r.:1r: j 11111 N 1114 I 1 11 I 1\l l'1 VI IYYf. 1 1 \IPrY 4. 1111 11W1111`141r 1Y1 WIJ, n V1' 1•.YN11YJ 111 111wIN 11111 11'11. IvV~ Y 1 111 1. a I YV , /1 1J1NE111111\Il1.11lIlI IlY1NMM11W •~YlllEr•IIYII~II J. ' / 111111 m / 4ll 1V.41 Ir YJ 1111u1111111n 1 ~ ~LL111 el 1 ~ u 1 1 / I~NNr.1 11 Giiri Tr ..Z:T "1111 at 111. 1' 1 1 1\1.1 1 •11 1 1 1 1. r I AEC L'11'E1~ OCi I 1 Iri'~ ~1, ~1 1' ~ r 1 1.1.11 ,L1 ~ .r 1111. 11 11 rl. ~ 1, CITY COUNCIL AGKNDA vt tj{ cK-UP SUMMARLY SIMU MKETINQ DATE: Novembor 20, 1984 SUBJECT; Approval of the final replat of the Watley Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 (formerly Blount Addition) SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0.13 acres situated east of and abutting south Locust Street north of Eagle Drive and more fully described as Lot 1, Block it Watley Addition and being a replat of a parr, This site of Lot 7, Block B, Blount Addition is zoned commercial (C) and a bookstore development is anticipated. City will construct 811 water line from Eagle Drive to the frontage of the property. Sanitary sewer, electrical, telephone, and solid waste disposal services and facilities are adequate and available. The final plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, ACTION REQUIRED; Approval or denial of the final replat RECOMMENDATION: The planning and zoning commission rorommends approval of the final replat of the Watley Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of final replat ATTACHMENT: Reduced final replat Harry q1. Persaud - Development Review Planner 0423] $IMr or tI xA5. Cllli Illy 01 OCN10N: P' ,wnlr~wF~ 'EIT sraFET.- :8E411,11 I l l 1, *111 Bt Sp 1 6111.1, •i r I e,,l n Ill I l ~ IPfll, wdMIN OOIJI VttU1w 11 J u `1 I1, 1 1 1 1 II I P I.Ir I1,. I 11 1' S: 1!r1 s (11A 0`001 IVIN 11 1 1 r I I I N l ll J L. 1 l I~ 1 f, t 14 Mfeu4 f .1111 I a 11 ..I, 1 I,~ 1 , r, LIU a r 111 , \ o $ III I)H f, f+/ a 1 , e_Il Pn, 11 r1h .1 I'L, {1 k Fill 1w l V. I. I kill' wana. II ..I n.. 1, 1• I VICINITY MAP l Ilw,ra •Ilr4 •I ul No Itll~ l <u\t 4nrl: i 1 11111'1 I1+ i. lhl V•111' 11rr •1 11,1 r • ' r,J \•'I 11 it r rlir 1a1 1'. I lir 1 I '1 I1 l rl. r t - ~ 1111111 •+nln t•ll ulirl ,rW 1,'r 1,..l 11, .,.1 T"m 1nl IL. Sniit lift„1 91f1 ..t 11.1 Loral 11. I 1 1 hl I ~ (L1p1 lent ,!1„1:1;1 I•~ 16r 4n1n 11.y .I l llpl' 1•-, .rl 1n IfIC It at tlr.r nl L I I~r 111f '•r J'. lilr.l 1..1 ill"r II 11.1' lir I • i it . , r r I . iIIIVI \Irr lu•wfwl llr. id ll r 1.1 re. , Ifri 11• IIPr.. . ' I I1, 1 1r n.f,l q LOT 1,DLII s'.11 rm cn l.nr I•,1N ul vn nl In110 IYi, 0113 AQ. 1HSl II wlllllr e. non `1 .II l1 rr ,1 1 AI°. e' 'f PAR, QI l vl 'A pnq it lot ?I elccl 1 •.1 11 111 r e B.Ctdlf A°Ot,q fl .n. 1~I f 1 I1 l 7 U1 111 ,Ill + n WAS"llil N1 WA11,rI 11+11 Iq 7.1+p r1 t Vet ON 00000 lt. I u r711w r. it A CI'11 iI'll Wl Ili I x.1 11.1 we 0" Fill 1 us+lwe iue{ stctrrse Dort a Lei SOUTH LOCUST STREFT m-a}`l - FINA P L A T. CI'llll,,.R":1'11,1 I lt, LOT_11_.BLOCK I, WATLEY ADDIS ...rat r, Pl pr,-r a Ell A RCf1,Ar J~ I PAQI If r¢nN 111. rr, r' r l IIJ "I :.a: ht I0.-' rr r m kktf• Lr+ nit 1, 1111 , ill 1 -1r r1• 11r 111, 1, dr. lrrftr ;IT, 0r OEWroN, rdp4T^N CO(l TEX .rrl nv 11 1.. 1'.,r . a 1 ,x1111'.,11. .o, el ..n1f r1 ,r 11r 1111 <.`I rc 11 '1 11 r1 I• .1 L rl.n Ir lr Ilinu' 1.. . 9 A$$ 0 C' `SIC r YIHG 1. 1 ~ s EP6 i a CITY CuUNC:it, A04NPA BACK-UP bURMARY SIiLL'i' r 1:5i Ma:L'i'INC3 DATL; Noveinber 3:01 19U4 'IU13JLC'i'; Approval of tlta prelisninacy plat of the Westgate Heights Addition SUMMITRY; '1'nis is a tract of 44410 acres situated west of and abutting Payne Drive and north oi; the northern terminatioss ut ThUnderbird Drive. The site is zoned for single Lamily (8r'-10 anti Sr'-7) and single family development is antieijeted. The sanitary sewerlines will need to ue further checked to determine the adequacy of existing capacity. Perimeter ctreet paving is required along) Payne Drive, and sidewalks are to be provided along Payne and 't'hunderbird streets. Water( sewer, electrical, teleph,')ne, and solid waste disposal facilities and services are adequate and available. ACTION RLUUIKEll; Approval of the preliminary plat RLCOMMLNDtv21ON I The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of, the preliminary plat of the Westgate tieigihts Addition with tine following conditions 1. That study of sanitary sewer loading is being mace of sewer on University Drive to determine it it has salacity for the additional loading of 37 units krom said addition, be required n as indicated sanitary by the sewer study. z. That developer run 12," waterline across his property frontage oil Payne Drive. 3. City may participate in oversizing agreement and/or oft-site pro rata agreement. A121'LRNA`1'IVLS; Approval or denial of the preliminary plat ATTACHMENT; Reduced preliminary plat Harry N. erseuci Development Review Planner 04'llj r r r l I r '7 Iler•I 1 v ~ r 1 , . I~ 1 . ...r ' ~1 a <W6 r. Q I,v \ 1 1 1 ' ~ r.. } .L I . r ' ~r .rte, ...~I__._. I I_ _ r.~ _ ~~..:5.11 ~ 1~ f . r 1 1 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~1 u 1 I e LILL I II'.I 0.s. 1A 6N APIs k dSwi ' v' 1 r-~y--- lyV. • M. IOAIr •LI1L141•S'~_Ll!l.'_.LA_'_...,i.CL_3. 1111111111:1 .'IAI CITY COUNCIL AULNUA BAQN-UP SUMMAjtY IULVk M4LT1NO DATE s November 20r 1984 SU6JLCTs Approval Ot the ixeii;minary plat of the Windsor West Addition SUMMARYs 'Phis preliminary plat is for a tract of 52.982 acres situated west of and abutting Bonnie brae and south of and abuttitly Paynci Drive. The site is zoned planned development district (PD-86) comprising residential, single family (8F-7) , multi-family (ME'-1) , zero lot line, and neigh- borhood services. The existing 8" water line along Payne Drive may be subject to oversizing with City p. rtioi j4tion. Electric service is available and details are to be worked out later. An existing 8 foot utia,ity easement is to be provided at the rear of resi- dential lots. Main telepione services will ui available from Payne Drive. Commercial and resi- dential solid waste uisWsal services are avail- aole. Northway :street is to be designated a collector size street. Perimeter street pavi;cj is required along Bonnie Brae with City partici- patio►I. AC'T'ION ALQUIHI;U; Approval of the pceliminary plat RBCOMMENDNTION ; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat oL the Windsor West Addition with the following conditions; 1. A study indicated a relief sewer line of at least 10" is required to carry this increase in loading from Greenbriar and Hinkle streets acid south along Hinkle Street approximately 2600 feet to an existing 15" sanitary sewer line at the proximity of the Denton High School, this also includes a bore underneath Highway 380. The city may prtici-pate in oversizing this relief sewerline to 18" diam- eter as well as oft-site go rata agreement if requested by ,Letter. 2. The city requires a 12" waterline to be constructed from University Boulevard north along Bonnie Brae Street and tie into the proposed waterline along Payne Drive and the existing 8" Waterline at the corner of Payne Drive and Bonnie Brae Street. City may par- t;iei.pate in oversize and pro rata agreements. City Coulloil Sapkup Windsor West Aaoition November 2U, 1984 Page 2 ALTLRNATl VBSs Approval or dunial of the preliminary plat A`iTl'ACHMENTs Reduced preliminary plat starry' N. Yersaud ,,,c Developient Review Plalllier 0419] I i I {.r Nll illllllJ~. Llri( 1' llrl 1 f.]]5 •111 1\:1•l\•rt 1 - 5 ( r r r\• r L1 .a5\ r l i u I IIY IIIt~l 11'1, ":11 i I 111 AYN l 1. II c Tu l ~ - y-.uan 111 r-. l ~ ~ ( 1.l ..1_ rr 4~~~ kl+fpl OOD tit" _ . 11111 / .tot. t 1 1 WAIN IINIR ` ~4,` / ~ r"- I Y'- `J I Vl ~ QIL l ~.-lD4 1 ~ T I ~r, , 1 ~r I IN r. ry 5 4 ' Il un~rb~l . f ~ f•1 ~ ^ ~lrf a~-• 0 7 V ~ _ ~•r{ ~ I:r n.11 A 1 I 5 ~ I L ~3~.r , L JI r'1 l M 110tH 1f0 +\\\-.l 1 I uutn lAlLilyr t ~ - SIpA ~ ❑ ul..'I 'J I \ ~ -ilCO a 4 0 q1l•4 alMelt \I yyyyy AOk3LL415wi.R1.9A1.L9-''L ,+1{ f15M6 [N41t r 75 ff}I~I .M/ `0 1/1u' 1 ~ I T .r ..t 1r rl(JMr.I\. Irll I ALAI/ i'rlWr ►ItL C,1'S ':1~ 111 AH N( ' - ~ ~ V!'.NDAO0. W(,yf ADLttg4 I 41 ~1 pl~- ~I~_ - 1llu u 1 J,:' Alpo/ar. VIM 140u104 IOLtT104 Wl' { iT-'i Jl i'> rl 1010' ~~Ili n~, ~1'uSOJF Ji{oilll~~luf flIWIW" MAi 1'•-'L~i I' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RHCOMMHNDATION TO THE CYTY COUNCIL To,, Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1683 bJeoting Date: November 20, 1981 G13NRRAL INFORMATION Applicant; W.S. Nash P.O. Box 1552 Denton, TX 75202 Status of Applicant: Owner Requested Action: Change in zoning from the single family (SF-7) classification to the planned development (PD) classifi- cation. If approved, the PD will permit the development of 96 zero lot line units (typical lot size 1101x40') Location and Size: A 15.1 acre tract located on the west side of Stuart Road approximately 700 feet north of Windsor Drive Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential, church; A, S-1511 SF-7 South - Townhomes, apartments, PD-25A, PD-24 Bast - Single family residential, church; PD-24, SF-7 West - Vacant; PD-72 Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity. (Case 0 Z-1683) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Drainage: A main drainage channel is located just to the north of this tract, The drainago from the townhousos directly south of the property flows through this tract: the developer must make provi,ions to handle this runoff, Transportation: The stroot alignmonc shown in the proposod planned development site plan mayy not be the most desirable appproacl:. Street stub-outs shown should connect to existing streets, Some curves and alignments shown will need to be revised, Windsor Drive, a secondary major arterial with 80 feet of right-o£-way, does have adequate capacity to serve the proposed devel- opmont, North Locust, a major arterial in the area with 120 feet of right-of-way, does not have capacity raider existing conditions to serve this proposal plus the recently approved planned development to the west. IM 2164 is a part of the state highway network and may be improved or widened if future development and traffic justified it becoming a priority project, but as with most state highways, no details or guarantees are available. Utilities: Adequate electrical, cable TV, telephone and gas services are available to this site. Adequate water and sewer service is also available for extension to this site. ANALYSIS This site is located in a low intensity area. Low intensity areas as stated many times represent the city's primary housing areas whereas moderate and high intensity areas emphasize mixed developments and commercial or employment areas, respectively. These areas are planned to correspond to an overall gross den- sity policy of 4.7 units per acre and overall intensity policy measured at 75 trips per day per gross acre. (Case N Z»1683) Page Three ANALYSIS (Continued) An intensity study reveals that the proposed development will not violate the overall intensity standard based on existing land use; however, there is a concentration of moderate and higgh Intensity land use and zoning in this area, The following land uses are located in the immediate vicinity; (1) Windsor Vil- lage Townhomes - 26 units, (2) Windsor Place Estates Apartments . 64 units approved, (3) East Windsor Village Apartments - 117 units approved and (4) Benchmark Villas development - 44 units, There is also further moderate and high density zoning in the area, Earlier this year, the City Council granted approv- al of a 120 acre planned development immediately to the west of the current proposal, Specific zonings approved In that planned development included sixteen (16) acres of multi-family with a density of twenty-two (22) units per acre, twenty-four (24,9) acres of duplexes/fourplexes with a density of 12 units per acre, and nine (9) acres of single family attached garden homes at 10 units per acre. The above figures indicate that the area is already concentrated with moderate and high intensity land uses, The above figures also attest to the fact that diversi- fied housing types are available in this area of the city. RECOMMENDATION Due to the concentration of moderate and high density housing and the diversification of housing available in the area, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of Z-1683 by a vote of 6.0. ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve planned development with conditions 2. Approve planned development without conditions 3. Deny request for planned development ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. PD site plan 3. Reply Form Totals 4, Property Owner List 5. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of August 8, 1984 0732a Y I - I 1, ti - flo 1 } ~I~ 4 ,~sfr'A I~ rr nki Fl- 41 01 > Y. !Y e ~ llrtV J rl , kF ` I 'ri~~e '•e.i i y {T I I tl 1~~ 1 , li.1i y r 1 Ill Y j~dy , L ll I Y ^4 4~5~ J I~rL 1~ J; 1 ;4 ri 'YIt11~~1 I ~ , ~f i , , ` 1 I 1 tr?le9 .7 '»''1~1 rI. a4 K sf~ft P Il1~~vl , j ~ Ilr h'I(lee i/N, I 1 f t 1 1, f s r ,I `Y ti r, .?YH! ,I r1 ~`y3~K~~,~'µ~~1~ ~ I r fib . ~ r r N'~ I ~1 ~~P~7-,'~ 4) f t , it ~ ~J 3~ ~I I ~ Jr} .~~+M.rr 2'a ,s,' .rY r.~ ~ `I ' ~ J~ ~ J~,.• r 6 71 a I 'l31 I 7 ' ; 1r ,Y t~ L. ~w~~e t 9y{ i I , , kwJt H ~ :,~~5 vi r4~[a,~~4y JI Ire l ti;'~ p4°rC ~4. ' A,l rN(~ '3~ -I l~~+i . 4 I r •-~I r ' , I, S 1.1 311, h 1, ~e , L✓~ d ~f! ~ r: A ~ C 1 ~~5~ Y M} yC tB r ~J ~ "t ~Y~. 55'+k~ t".trr~l It71J y, ' I 11y,r , y + j,~'r TTM.. I}};} I~r~ A t n~'•~ Y.. i~j}., ~ > lr,r, r r t ~ I t Y f .C 1 f~ ~ FF&& Jr` trY ~.f~ r~t'{.J'. rT .,i I r i ~I ~ i ~~k 1. ~ i<,r~ rte.. ~\I;`, a 1,. i hl!l F+~ I 1 I 3F ~ ~ It i , ~,4?t~ 7 ~ ~jf. J ! •1 { Y~.i utr^ fi1r rr 7" I C r , law j,ll t~ CI e~qk Awl "'6'"y1Q l ~~i%w~ ~ i, h ,r.. h rr1 ~ r ~ A ~ ~ r 1 c;,ke.. ~ i 1bC >M ! r~ 1 , ,>•,y '9 ~3 ~ 11~' I 1~.: ~ 1 1 r..r ,k r k`~. J i ,3 fR a ,V k rt1 i~' ~ ~ ; ~ i 'p fi' j Fv}~' `I~ 1, # r , ~ A,i 1 t Y ~i I ~ I C ~ r'• f ~j j4 ,'~;r Y3.! I ~ h.~ ~ r r ~ „a. f XI M r rj'I~ ~ { S; v s v 'I i~ . ~tlr l~j+~re ~ 1 yy .i ' \ ..+..+:,.{~f~•r 1 ~ ~ r r , Y, ✓ Xy I7 },ja, 3~;~r} p r!{?.1, +r•.i I~ry ll,r ~ l 31 ~ ~ ~ r~tF YM,YIKI p`~., . li t l ~L~~~..., ,I ;~'ISSY a .e ! , r~Y~rfr :.R 1n, ~r rl ra ) ~yfq~dJ' 1~~~ v~~~ t ~jl ♦ 21 ~i6~ t ly ^1 v I K I ~Y. ~,5'tN, Y 1 r{{~1 ~ ~fl ~,14~ ~u ~~;3n f ~j~ v y){Z iY,l>.✓1 p ~ t t(v I I w ~ ! I 1, ) r5 1 y 2. J Y y 4 ( 6 1 a~ z~ x~ x o z Q 2 a M a ~ T ~ r" a0 ,H'01C 04,00 A ► . S ape poor ,o g ~ecl I~ ,oooli .s+of f oQ O' 8 1 0 o R '8 •8 r co'0► g 9 Y 3 i ' ro $ ,oo-010 O 9 9 4 °jr 00, 8 _ _ e 00 oil ' z ? $too ,0011 001 391 ,BCttC M„bl,f*LbYS rt g 9 s 1 q ' $ ,noon 00011 of oo'0n M 60 oil ,00000 N o.R 0001 0001 R IL'0ol t Q Well 00 ,00'.e ,0001 ,00'00 00•►e ill ,trite a,tf,ec eee a 13 ~p N • N PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL 2-1683 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None RoCeived James L. & Rayma J. Perkins 629 Aspen Denton, 'VX Betty Webb 516 Aspen Denton, TX William F, COndron 1907 rlintwood Drive RiChardson, TX 75081 Gorald & 6:4oky Goodgame 709 Aspen Denton, TX Tana & Ken Woods 512 Aspen Denton, TX ,q 1 ~ f / if I ).4 ~ ~ I r.~._.._...~ 111 1 ~ t I. ti- a - ....rte. •_.1 ~«u~~..r~.u`~~.~~~.~. ~ 1 ~ ll. f ` I / Jr ri~~ ~...u..,~_.~-..~..•~ ~ ~ .~»~.r_~~ V Il~~+~~~ u.•.w+•Jy L:L YI.IY.: J. .1l I. 1 14 r~~ ~./-1 "'ry•.r~ f7 P ~~Ir iris r III ~ , w r _I I .01 I f I \ ' r 1.1 ` ~ fla ~ ~.1 F.I. - ~I r~\ 1tII c kI ~ i i Z Minutes Au8ust 8, 1,984 Page 10 Mr. Escue made a motion to tahle -1682 for :;ix weeks until a now intensity study could be done, Seconded by Mr. Claiborne. Motion failed 21.4, (Ms, Cole, Chairman LaForte, Mr. Pearson and Mr. Sider voted no, Mr, Claiborne commented that %here will be a great pressure on tied traffic on Ridgewa' Drive and staled he is in favor of tabling until Commission can receive an intensity study, lair. Pearson stated he 1would like to see the request Mass, He feels it is a good plan and there arc &oinc to be pressures on Ridgeway Drive. Mr. Sidor made a motion to approve Z-]c,82. Seconded by Mr. P,~arson and passed 4-2. (Mr. Et. ue and Air. Claiborne voted no,) C. Z-1683. This is the petition of W, hash requesting a cnangc irj .oning from the single f.amiIN, (SF-7) cl;,.ssi- fication to the planned development (P1?) classification on a 15.1 acre tract locat-d on t11e ;est side of Stuart Road approximately 700 ;Feet north of tiiinel s o r Drive. if approved, the planned dev(;lopin ent pewit the devel - opment of 90 zero lot line units i'typical lot size •)0'x As, Spivey stated thtiire were 29 reply forms mailed to property owners tilith 200 feet of the Subject prope';t.v; 1 was returned in favor anc. ; in oppos.itior,. Jim Neal stated he was vepresontin;g Nr, h,lsh and they are proposing.96 zero lot line units in the mid-priced range, He stated lie feels this gill tnhance this area as well as the community. Mr. Claiborne asked the reason for such small yards and how many square feet will be under the roof, Mr. Neal stated most peopl,, have no desire to maintain a large yard and there will be from 1100 to 1350 square feet under the roof. ms. Marion Hamilton, 900 Sierra stated she has livc,d in. the, area for 2J Years and She doe 511`t ls'ant an encroach' [lie lit of multi - family, She stated the traffic situation on Stuart Read is a nightmare ani the area is overloaded dl t!'1 S1il~i l .l h I1C CGie ilofhe s 311i0' J f' ve i opfnffllt N fi ; Minutes August 8, 1984 Page 11 14s. Spivey stated this site is located in a low intensity area, Low intensity areas as stated many times represent the city's primary housing areas whereas moderate and high intensity areas emphasize mixed developments and commercial or employment areas, respectively. She stated these itreas are planned to correspond to an overall gross density policy of 4.7 units per acre and overall intensity policy measured at 76 trips per day per gross acre, She stated an itensity study reveiils that the proposed development wi11 not violate the overall intensity stan- dard based on exiS'ting land use; hol,ever, there is a concentration of moderate and high intensity land use and zoning in this area, She further stated City' Council granted approvaI on specific zonings of planned developments, the figures of the approved planned developments indiC,ate that the area is already concentrated with moderate and high intensity land uses, She stated due to the concentration of moderate and high density liousing and the diversification of housing available in the area, staff recommends denial of Z-1683. Mr, teal stated they were going to build quality homes wlt,h 10 year warranties. He stated they leant an economical''), feasible home and the adjacent area is an older area, chair declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Sidor commented the existing is SF-7 w:,th 4,? units per acre and they are proposing to reduce this number. He stated lie is not sure this is appropriate for the abutting proper%.y. Mr. Claiborne stated the lot size is average 4=100 square feet which is Icss than a for a mobile home park. Mr. Claibornt., made a motion to deny 4-1683. Seconded by ;pis. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0). D. 1c-5. This is the petition or William Rogers requesting a variance of Article 4.15, Paragraph A, of the City oi. Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. 'I lie above s,(,ction requitcs the d,!veloptr to ii:O,o (iile(ILIiiIP hr~V15io1) for 5l'0 M JT8i1-1,1 r1iCit'S proper~j l'~`djvli6ed or JcveIcr I,ie p!'C~Pvrty involved is S:'c:tions 1 and 11 of the Solar AddiCion. i PLANNING AND ZONING COMP+iCSsIQN RKCOMMfaNDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To,, Denton City Council Case No,: Z--1698 Meeting Date: November 20, 1984 GENERAL INF'OPMATION Applicant: Keith A. Rubeck 250 South 8temmon8, Suite 230 Lewisville, TX 75067 Status of Applicant: Purchaser Requested Action; A change in zoning classification from the single family (SF-7) to multi-family (MF-1) Location and Size: A,pproximataly 8,00 acres situated at the southeast Corner of Bernard and Collins Street Existing Land Uae: Single family (SF-7) vacant Surroundin; Land use 4xnd Zoning,, Notth - Multi-family, Mesquite Midge Town Houses (MF.-1) South - Single family houses (SF-7) and multi-family (MF-•1) East. - Single family houses (SF-7) Wept - Single family (SF"-7) Denton Development Guide: site is locatod in a low intensity a rea SPECIAL INFORMATION utilities; There is an 811 diameter water line and a 6" diameter sanitary sewer lino along Bernard and Collins street, The existing sewer capacity is inadequate to serve multi.-family use on this site, There is need for an additional 1011 diameter sanitary sewer line for about 3,000 feet to prevent overloading the system. Drainage: Drainage infrastructures will need upgrading as the Cleveland area is already flooded, (Case # x-1698) Aago Two MCIAL INFORMATION (Continued) Transportation; The site has direct access to 8ei;nardl and Collins, both residential streets which ate loaded to capacity at this _ time. ANALYSIS The proposed zoning change from single family (SF-7) to multi-tarnily (MF-1) claesification is inconsistent with the Denton Development Guide policies. a. The guide establishes a standard of 75 trips per day per acre for low intensity areas, The proposed multi-family (M'F-1} development will generate 200 trips per day per acre yielding a total of 1600 trips. This entire single family district has a planned intensity standard of 9,600 and based on existing zoning this capacity has altpady been exceeded by approximately 17%. The proposed zoning change to multi- family, if approved will result in an overall 33% above planned intensity standards, b, The Development Guide recommends as a matter of priority the need to protect the existing housing stock, Low and moder- ate income people should have protection of their quality of life, This includes protection from traffic, noise, privacy and their home property values. The increase in densities and additional traffic in this neighborhood will have sub- stantial undesirable impacts on existing single family housing. c. The Development Guide policy is that high density housing (apartments) should have access by secondaq arterial or greater and medium density concentration require at least one access by collector street. This site abutts Bernard street to the west and Collins Street to the north. Both are residential streets currently loaded to capacity. The increase in traffic to be generated by the proposed devel- opment will exceed the carrying capacity of these streets and result in further problems in this neighborhood. d, The Development Guide policy limits apartment concentration in low intensity areas to 200 units. Concentrations may be separated by 50% of neighborhood width or a half mile distance. In this case the proposed change to multi-family (W-4) will result in over 500 units in one concentration. The-`olte immediately Borth and abutting Collins street,is comprised of (1) Mesquite Ridge Townhousas - 94 units, (2) University City Apartments - 152 units and (3) Chapperal Apartments - 172 units. (total 418 units) (Case M x-1898) Page Three RECOMMENDATION No formal recommendation is available from the planning and zoning Commission, The Commission considored this item at its meeting of Ootober 10, 1984 and voted 3-1 for the denial of the petition. ALTERNATIVES 1,. Auprovs petition 3: UR"opetRion"family development for the site ATTACHMHNTS 1, Aerial 2, Reply Form Totals 3, property Owner List 4. Minutes}} of Planning and zoning commission of October 10, 1984 Harry N Persaud Development Review Planner 0314] I ! ^a r , r I1 1 , a I. ♦ G I Applow 1 AK. ~ 1. 1 Jl"„ U t m 1 I ' ~Nm b 1, k I ♦ "tit LLIN9 a • IS 'l l AI•~ I~TR 11 1 \ 1 t 1 ♦ 1 . .fit ti r 1 1 , :f ! 1 y k. 1 l I l~ 11 I I J. 1 r Iwl`h I~ S e. e... IJ IPS 1 *~V~I ) M 1, I ~ 1 lt.; r r 1• w...q PROPER'L'Y OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL. Z-1698 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED C. L. Hunt None Rocoixed 1211 Bernard Denton, TX .~V rYlrr".'o'1•I w+.w~f~1.1Y~.1~TTT~TrA1.~M'nw~nw..w.V.w /f ^fl /''jjJJ//ff~~I ~H f~ w-w.y+wrn+.MT1w_w.ww~'.nM`KY'^M.+-MMI~T`F.~.w~.w~1r.~~w1~.. ~r.tiyA~~..wM1~~r~n M.++.._~~.wr-.•_. r-n. r_4_---~.n_ ali ~1i .c, tj Il, ,'----.~•----r, 1..._x:.1..1 - ~ l~~): J1" :9~` mil/-~~1. ~-y/ l _ y ~"~TM1i ~"~Yrtn~1~}I THf'rrti..~ww~l ^~wl.~wn w~.~'AAM~~.~ItiFYw~+, T'++.Y M'nw~Yrrw ~ .....y r.....M 1~~+ri ~.rr ~ +~~.a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~~.....~.~.~.w, r... n~~..~.r~.w.~r~~~n.r. rte.......«.n ~1 l~v...............__..............._.~_...........~_..~...-...__......~._......_..._~. ~ 1, r i y ~ j! ~A~ I t l 1 l ~ ` I 1 .....Y~~y_.~..~.~..~.._.~.~_ _.....~I ~..u_`^ _~..~..r..~r.~r..:...... +r~,u..~~ ;...•I,~ Ida ..r...... ~ ' l ,1 ~7; , ~ ~1~•~ _ ._.~_..___'_r_~ ~ - _ I 1i. ,1 / l ~y~ i ~ , J. / ._.x._. ~ ' i P 6 Z Minutes October 10, 1984 Page 8 Cnair ueclared the public nearing ciosea. Cretirman L:14iporne commented roe nao a-ixed reserv,i- tions on the expansion of the none aria blowing the 1nte 11£1L}'. L0 Oe u3rsU up 1n the S(E'.a, He stALEao We ig nSnu ttie pCr!tSVe atio the 00 1V&•, nG rve:l£ .IL WOU10 be 0e1"Ie:.1Ci61 to l11G arGa rims Staten lie 1Gtena4 LO VOLE for Lrie ptcyo.;al. JU,: CIi lAdaE d iTi0LlUfl CO CE•COru.1ten0 appl'CtVa 1. c': 4-1014. w'ltn the :ullowlrtg conaltlorisi 1) Developuent e.rall E:ontoen, Lo appiovea zonlna Concept plan. i1 SpeclLSc site plill ap(;Lovai ih Le(jUlr'teU lot :++1 cl•1'L•l o p ill e n LS E•XCepl S11)41e Iall:l l}' LU) ano 0oplex lio'usln Ce plt,n 1RF'fovaJ. MUSL De yranC GU pr1Or to Crlii i:,Sual'1ce UL o'.:lia:ng pEYml t8. J) Den£1 ty iri ITWi tI'f+9n1'„i} Sect ion° t, anc f, sr,all be litllitea LL, It units per acre 4} Gtoss retail acreage iri section u snsll riot exceeo 6 acres On zoni.r:g concept plan. 5) Seatlc-n h £riall I:,e lritca co lava uses Permitted in trio c,ty of uc_r,Lon oi'fice tt`i £Gri: rlc oistricts Gn--y. b{ h ISil i,2n)Un~ t LUv"t EUI SO Corn til Cat ion woQ(; lllG 0 0r mitSUrJ-V ferL"'. L,', it l CIe' erECte0 4. 1ig 4.1 pr Opef L~ lines V1.E I'E' t=F,: ue r:::a1 lane uSe t• OL tiny L%,pe aout fetal) ana vi. C:iicr lor(: us(-. I) All City u: Benton 1)evelopilent Stahaa Y:i&, alvIvIofi riec., tat: C'ri s, Lit rla 'vc''el opmer,L CoUeE'. aria bailclr,G Gone heyuILLme i:t£ sO6 11 oe eri.OrCeo ur,lesS eXPIC5sly walVeu 7r, Lrie.. bppr.ovec pl ailr:cc aevel0piiient. Lp,ji Clelnanc'e, 4$) FItial sheet aiianutanL sr.z.. ue oeterliinea n} the City Transportation Fhglnel-r. .DL ion to ocean Lne GY 1C InaJ M r. Pe dC 5G11 t6aCie o 1- IOOL1On StaL inG nG w001a tic pi,iCe 1.t, It avcr of deck'.:t- 1ny trie plat) 1L Gonalt IOn numne r 4 were 1nor ea&E•c t rcim b to, 16 6c1eB, Sec onaLa t7}' C1ia IC'T~1•n Cla 1loor ne ar)C unanitiausly carrieG t4-0) . Mr. Escue seeondea the motion Lo r 'corr,laena apPtoval of 2-1646 witn the amencri,ehL mace fly M1. Pearson Mild Unanimousi. Carl -led (4-0). Mr, Pearson c0,')IDenovo Mr. U}'er Ur: Irle pianriI nu rrbCes£ aria foi' wcir,l.nC w•: to the r le:.gribUl'no0a. Li. i 6-1b`.'_b. Trils 1s tree pktiL 2Cn of t,EIto A. hULiCC r'. Y e1i t'st lnc a L".nin r:~G lt': Cite ZUI11 nU. C.;aB£Sf: Cali011 irur' 5.7)C le T6il.l i}' IS!' ~'1 to Gn ...o.:L C%i prt'CX1.-.i=.k. d:1'C-t. Sit~:inCet. l•i.zt C1 anu c:luct ing ❑t'-z C 1: £VUL.: U aI:G AC,LA t tl ;y Va J.l.t,1vs Street aria Wert 1'1 C.le, Ve. aria StYeCt it nG IM I:e roll} oescrloe~o as lot G.o.laCl: (,I: i+1ex6r.ccr n 11.1 bur Ve)', AUS L r aCL 16 Ue nt Or.. n tOWnno USe c(,r,uoi1iIniufr, pYC.;;ect call}>: sil)c BpprOXIniately li9 units is ploj-asea :.or trig site. 1 11 _t' P i 1~ Minutes Motu 104 1984 Page 9 t' Mr. Persaua stv a there wore 21 reply fortes mallea to property c•wners witnln 204 feet of too suo)eot property; one was retorneo in favor, o„e to oppo^ sition, anu one onaecieeo. w. oiai; dyers etaten ne wwE representing Mil Keitn h. kuoecr; in his pro.lect, He nanueo out summbrles or toe pr'o)eet ano snowed floor }'Mans of the pro- posee. He stated they have a stt'noavd of aevejop'- ment of apartments that they nave aevelope0 in other treas. He statec Loo hpartMenLS are pny&lcally structured as towrinomen witn the appearance Of single family nobles. He showed the lano plan ana StOt'eO they are proposing 34L parning spaces whim 15 in excess of the cit'f reauiremenw be emprin- L'rae'd mesquite kidce Apartments ano stated they have a !lice physical impact on trio ne:gnocrnood. he stateC Lney 010 5000 out letters tc muse in the area that the city aio to pose their plate anti relt ai t,nat time there was not any oppocltlon. he str,too they woot to proviee an attractive unit in tole oeignpornooo any raascnauie lino economical nouanng in one University arch 641sts. He 06te0 At is Ptovioing an owner occupieo housing develOpme'nt ano for that reason; ne iceis it would increase the value of the property in the aver,. He etated they Ere rocognizec bj Lae ConOOMIOIUM 0110ciation. He contlnueo trier are i.rcposiny concf Cate drives, unicA exteriors ana the density j.'roposeo is low'er' Onan treat foe' mult'i-Lfanivy zoning, be stateo LGe'tt hie plans ror a retention pone Cn '.lie nortnea;t vainer Cr one p;op6rtj, wnicn to buoit acrEs. he SCnteo LnOy w'oUiC De prC'i: IQ lit'.P'c1'eluNt: to tree OLainaaa tae Area as w'Eia as. ine Qvei'all Urain6yc E)'s'ue'.L. He stet-Ina tae;: oo extensive lane caYing on tn; - pCoperty Nna will try to ,reserve at many as rossi• We of the existing t:'ees, which will ennanU tnf property as well as tnB tie '_pIIGOC hOOa. He SLb LaO they tty to streen the .ra-°n s6fvice c;eas ant :Eel in general tnel a!e mailing a contiibuticn ty the City of Denton• he turtner stilted they w"9u1C oe makin, inprovr,;ment'e to the souto sloe OI. Col''-ins &Cf ee: a£. '.IEIt d!:. the OCalnaclH illlUr DVel11 E'f't.s 1:nC 'n'1 pi oscrve vie singie Wily rU610MLS Cf Me nelynnor- DODO. He Sta LeU tNe y nave nigh quality ':avs tractlun. C, V Hunt, on area reticent, St6tec he villa W heo to ail of trio ;esioents ana thtit main moncerD w&E the traelm pvcr,lems. It not to! Lnis, ne doesn't feel Lnere w•o'.lic oe any vh)ectlon from the neignoor- hooa, Urian burnt tuavpa sis firm was oevv wui'Ninq with C`t RJIicCr{ Inc i,i i fl;'e.5 id Nave .iOd ri., eCl the (,Omagh ISAGe's anO Lney ha VI aCLeyteO his suggestions. F.ar.oy Uj ty, a 11 0 ;L or laks `•Lreet, sited h.F CppoK tion oncezn is too Arai 1C pio rem, he ..tatoc cspel _;y cn belhACO anO.V0111nS btLee t. t.u.le liC^dG D06h EtVrra. C:'6010. OCIOCILS. •,t ` ..ti LEG '.14 -Et _1 uw! '.!A'• uLt. A:R ,.t,,' is LAYra. ale - Lot 01 `Ingle ..:+M11} HU0 5eS in tL.S "116. he Lateo'. ne en)oys lnC; in that neQnscC nood and fee4v the other reEioen..S. wOulo made Out ells leave it tc vtcome rental property it the prcposea is hpprovec, he ltatYC not rnVWInG Low deep tilt: aetehtilh pony will Ue, it 00*sn'L seen 11 Y Z Miromes October 10, 084 Page 10 safe for the children in the aret, He stated he feels the rciae genertitcd by the addiLional traffic would he a nuiKance. Mr, Perstrud stated there is an H 'rich water line and a t: inc'n sanitary sewer line along k;arnnrd and C'clline, streets. he stated Ole sew'3r line :+0016 require a IQ inch line instead of a Fb inch line, Electric, yas, and telephone services are in. place or availalle. He stated drb.inage infra-structures will nee(? v 9radinyt as the Clevehand arvr, is Glreadv flooded. lie stated the stye pl.911 has direct access to Bernard anti Collins, lotr. residential streets wl.ich are )Oiaded to capacity at this; tiI?,c lie slated the proposed ~Cnine sledge fro, ainole fbr( )ly to riulti-lrmily classif)cation is inccnsiat en t 1:1 th the Denton heveloptnknt GUir.e pr,liCies, 0,erefore, staff rerummE'n(is denial Of ~^).64F. MI . P:yers t-LeALd L1tP5' ale alIOwi119 0etl:a4!',s Ane, lan6sce. piry and proper sc:Ec'r:ino LC rrinir;ze t'r,e unsi,tisfactory ioc);s cf the t,r-artments from the front yard view and opinion cf Mr. uney, ".'its detention por.;i will re 'ry 90 percent Of t1'e time and will he LWC feet deep at the deerevt tu?inL, He states he had iearncti Of L h E need :or t'te larGer sewez lilts at t)i(. GPLelnpilx:t fievinw CCITrittke rreetiny prior to P.' atit tino and Toning Comcisaion rneeCirig and underii t.t,r,c)s they will ikve tc; 6,e6 1 whit )116% bn(i Lhat It is w'C`1, ka t.3e priObl E>:. a stated feels they are prCVidinc a 'r,f e.ring frcr the ei 1C; r, family' 11 Ctu: 1 r)9 sti(:'. bee, the r/J t'c 0ens~ e uEi nu. C)16:St C,eCl62`6'G alto- j>L 1.'13C hea11119 C1Q?. P.d, Chairman Clbitxrrre comrienter. ne doesn't feel that multi - family iMF-l) zcrt:no is thE• vLFt. +:s` ,f this land. Cii aivrar CIziharne r.a3e a notiOr; to 6r.nv -1tPF. Seconded :y Mr. %rerl. Mr, rt,arscr, cora;,,;rted trying to loo). at tT.i6 frcr. the pluses and minuses, ale doesn't :eel it would L' deverlol:oe as sirlttle fnrr,ily (1.;i-7) anc pvt hrrnd new hones there, P'e feels this, proc`c~a1 will bllow f%:r undeveloped lard to to developed and wc,"ld vote for the proposal. Vote was, C5lled a:te' ccru'!i .sjcn made nc. Iecom- menda'ion as "he vote was ..»1. ICrmr,.ssiener Fcersor. voted ❑o.) E, ^.-1( 99. '!'his is the peti':ici) of M 6 E Metal PrOCUC:s, inC„ repreeented '.ry Ftandy Srr:ti;, re,vest- i.nQ a chance irn x.onin, fr'or ti,e e9riculturaI r:lassiIicotion tc the Iic"..t ir',uust!ial .1:I) c)assi° 7iC6s.icn on a 1.9 acrd trr:ct located or1 the wvst t, :.de of f; oIn n.i c' 1: ra E, G.t rt?Et, a p:rcxi!t.p 1, el\, t, ^(ip feet f,autll of 16i j 101- oud St: eYt . The tract it mcrw ):ertitL'_arly 'eecri•ced re :x'00 E.onnie Hra•= 6treet. Ats„ Spivej' t.Lz'.ted there were f:v(m ze}:v rotas ai ed tl C`YbY+E:12`. cwneI';F fEet. C.f tt..e 9ll C: rcVie :.y onE was .e,uel,ec i:. cF:}os.,...n :nb aeYc ft,VOY. Mr. F.andy Smith st'ate`d he was rerprkitenting M 6 B Metal. Product!., :r:¢„ and that on )wau:at i', i984, th::s 1`usinet: ww t'es<royed tv :its, w'tr,ch haei teen located here and opvvatino for the part 11 6 years. PLANNXNG AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Tot Denton City Council Case No,t Z-1703 Meeting Date: November 20, 1981 GENERAL INF'CRMATIOR .Applicants Ralph Collins representing Henry S, Miller Co., Inc. 2001 Bryan Tower, 30th Floor Dallas, TX 75203. Status of Applicants Owner Requested Artiont Change in zoning from the agricultural (k) to the planned development (PD) classification. If approved, the planned development will permit the following land usest 57.1 acres - office (0) 29.1 acres - multi-family (MV-2) 61,5 acres light industrial. (LI) 95.7 acres commercial (C) Purpogo i Unknown Location and Sizot A 293.3 acre tract located adjucent and north of I-35E, approximately 1800 feet east of Loop 288 FxiW'ng Land Uset Vacant Surrounding Land Use and 'Loningt North - Agricultural, Single family, Churrhj A South - I-35E Gast - Andrew Corporation, Singlo Family, Agricultural) .LI, A West - Denton Towne Centers PD-28, PD-28.1, PD-991 tiT ))enton Development Guider Site is located in a high intensity area. i (Crude t Z-1703) Peg 0 Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Mw._ __.•._w.... wN_. w. __~w_•r. r.... r _..r w.wnwwrT n..wr_.......... w. _ r._w.r.M w._.+wl._Y._ _N M... w. _ ___M_ r. "Public Facilitiesi Engineers representing the petition- et's met with the Development Review Committee to discuss infra-structure oapabilitieto in the area of this and a subsequent request totaling approxi mately 300 acres in size. Specific comments are attached for review but, gene7rally, adequate utilities, street and drainage facilities are in place or available for extension. ANA.LXS'I S 'Phu three hundred acres controlled by the petitio'novs is the subject of two (2) separate zoning ohan a requests for office (4), multi-famlly (MV-2), commercial (C3, and light industrial (LI) planned development (PD) zoning. This site is located in an area designated as one of three high intensity or major activity centers, Little or no control of intensity is proponed for high intensity or major activity centers, Availability of adequate infrastructure is possibly the most-, critical factor and the, concept plan suggests balanced growth that is planned to insure that neighbtsrhoods and low density streets are not dis- rupted. In gens,ral', major activity centers are expected to be the major industrial, commercial and employment centers of the city. More particularly, land use diverr)ity, including high density housing, is encouraged by providing housing near jobs and services, The Golden '.Triangle Mall major activity center is identified as the dominant center for the city in the Denton Development Guide. I Staff feels that this planned development and the controls associated with it will ensure more efficient planning of the major roads., drainage and utility systems for this area than is possible with unrestricted zoning. The controls associated with a planned development will also enable the City Council to restrict certain "so-called" undesirable land uses in this area. (Case 0 x-1703) Page Mcee RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approvril of z-1703, by a vote of 5-0, with the following conditions The fallowing land uses Eahall not be permitted in the approved PDs Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or Commercial Racing Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent) Brick Kiln or 't'ile Plant Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House: Dump or Sanitary Fill Area Cemet'ry or {Mausoleum Extraot,ion acid Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone, Clay or Ggvel Fttiirg;~ounds c>r Exhibit Area Go-Cant Track: Halfway House Hatcbory, Poultry Hauling oi: Storage Company Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage*. Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psyohiat~-ic Patients Livestock Auction Livestock Feuding Plant., Pens or 'Yards Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes Open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery Petrolemm Co?.lecting or Storage Facilities Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard Rodeo Grounds Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage Stable, Commercial Mental Stable, Boarding Stable, Privates Club Storage acid Sales of Furniture or Appliances Outside a Building Theater, Drive-In Tire Re-Treading or capping • Tool Rental Trailer 'amp or Mobile Home Park Trailer Rental or Sales Used Auto Parts Sales - - (Case # 2]703) Page Four ALTERNATIVES 1, Approve petition with conditions 2. Approve petition without conditions 3. Approve petition Yoith additional conditions 4. Deny petition ww.rr.www.wn__.+.w~..ww►rr•...__rr~.,___..._v.rwr Y.. ,rnrww_4w.._►w_nr_r.,..w_M.w.wwY.. _...,.,...r.rww w►_._~ ATTAC}1M8 NTS -._..__....r__ ww.w_____...._._____..___..... 1. Map 2. PD Concept plan 3. Memorandum from City Engineer 4, Development Review Committee minutes of June 26, 1984 5, Reply Form Totals 6, Property Owner List 7. Planning and Zoning 0-.nmission minutes of October 24, 1984 0340) } t 1 LI 1 00. S - 165 ter,,.-~M f 1, % r Pb, 20 t w r .y a~'1 j 1 _12 I I } I I ' I 1 , LEGEND V 'Pfl-MP-2% Wr,.•%MO 't0PMENt 89,1 A0. 'pp„ Ow J~irn D1IMOPMENi 87,1 A0, %P0.0% t =cMVttorMEN1 88.7 A0. ` C~ +PO-L1A P'"~;S°AREVEEO►MENt 81.9 A0, O'O~o,/ 300E AO arrc TOTAL 300.9 A0, P,V'',r 1 r d e ~V100TY MAP li~Pn1v~~ ~ s~. ~ •ri -JTRAOT 2 rb• Ain. oo-,t •2., 9/.1 AC. 110 AO ~ ICOL L. A to i Ac. ti a s A0 : Y\ I'D Ll TRACT 1 s AC 1J „ 243.4 AG. DALLAS p L. 29 1A AC' ~g r/ 4i OAO -~5_E~- _z ~i~~-~~.~:-''~~ A.•~~•_'•~-~/' -"'Z'1f„~'71G7•---~xr----•--,•rr ~y-'\ ~ ~ V,= ~ „ ~ =gym. .rt_ . H 38 ~r; • - ZONING EXHIBIT 1 1)CVE:LOPEiRt M. a 300.5 ACRES-DENTON, TEXAS l~,~'MAN1OH'F:R.10At1,Ot)p r, PA1.2,A5,TF:r15 95201 /_`ncwAAUna.nA «e z. ~~0 3 a CITYW DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 9U11.D1NC; / DEN7oN, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $668200 M E M O R A N D U M TOt Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner FROM3 Jerry Clark, City Engineer DAVE: October 17, 1984 REI Z-1703 and Z-1704 The tract has a heavy impact on Denton with relation to infra structure needed to serve its future uses. Three major roads bound the tract with the railroad on the other side. 1-35 already has adequate right-of-way. Loop 288 is a major arterial with 120' of right-of-way. The pavement section probably already meets our requirements. Mayhill Road is shown to have Loop 288 rerouted into it which will require 120' right-of-way. Alignment to be adjusted to meet the I-35 underpass. Calorado Soulevara is a secondary arterial, right-of-way of 80'. Alignment shown on the plan meets our previous comments. Developer to build 17' minimum on Mayhill and Loop 288. The City to participate in 7' - 11' in conjunction. Colorado Boulevard will require the developer to build a large enough section to meet his internal traffic needs, part of the median may have to be instructed as it is to be divided in their proposed road and in the existing road to the west. All other internal collectors to be developer funded. Drainage needs to have a major detention facility constructed to hold runoff increases in a pond so the railroad culverts will not have to be upgraded. This will maintain historic runoff discharges downstream for the larger storms that could cause damage. The tracts on the northeast drain to the northwest under Loop 288. Detention should also be used here to maintain use of the existing 72" culvert. A major channel will run through the property with design size controlled by the developer engineer. we will support an earth channel since detent.i.on s being used for the outlet to maintain the green space:. Please advise if further information is requested. CAOAX Jerry ark City Engineer M Minutes Development Review Committee June 26, 1984 DRC Members Present; Jerry Clark, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison, Wayne Horsley, Don McLaughlin, Koorosh Olyei, Tommy Stone, Tex Stewart, Pablo Rubio, David Ham Developer Present: Mike Reynolds Engineers Present; David McCarver, Phillip Patterson XXS. Review of Pre-Design Conference - 300,9 acres of proposed PD land use ,A, Engineering 1. Drainage (detention at lower end) leave 'culverts as is - no increase of existing flows - show phases in PD 2. No 6" sewer. 3. T intersection - Colorado and western north-ysouth street - 80' right-of-way 4. No streets across railroad - put collector on northeast corner - ourve up to new Coop 288 above Page Rd. Mayhill/State School Rd, - match with 120, right-of-way for rialocation. S. Make Mayhill concrete as other side Allen Estates - is to be concrete. S. Minimum 241 roads (city collectors) 1098 02 - 1/2 pavement when used. 7. Schedule phases of road in PD ordinance, B. Water and Sewer 1. Water lines are acceptable provided industrial area is served with 3000 g.p,m. factor. 2. Sewer lines to be sized using 126 g.p.d. per capita x 4 pecking factor. 3. Need 161 easement for offeite water line-and sewer line. Double manhole sewer line to 2111 and 2411 outfalls, Development Review committee Pro -Desiln Contereace Jun* 2bt 1984 Pale Two B. Water and Sewer (Continued) 4. Submit letter ragueatinq oftsite pro rate agteement on sanitary sewer. 5- Minimum s12e for water is 811 and sanitary sewer site is loll, C. Electric 1, Electric service available. 2. Electric installation will be per City of Denton general requ;irsmsnts underground commercial/ industrial customers electric service. 3. The 138 KV transmission lines eassmont needs to be shown on plan; the two pole'structurss shown on your topographical maps were removed several years ago and replaced with the single structure 1.18 KV lines. Suggest a boulevard be designed around the 138 KV lines considering the easement restrictions 4. The utility easement along the north side of the MKT railroad tracks need to be shown on plans. S. The electric utility department will need to build a main distribution line (13.8 KV) acrosa. D, Building Inspection Driveway access from major arterials shall be limited as stated in Subdivision and Development Standards Ordinance. E. Transportation Engineering 1. Mayhill is primary major arterial with 120+ of right-of-way. 2. Mayhill (future Loop 288) must match existing state School Read. 3. Colorado is secondary major arterial with 80, of right-of-way, 4. Colorado should tie into the street off of r-35 as a T intersection. 111ngCea D*Viiapmant Review committee Pro-Design Conference JUnq 264 1984 Page Three E. Transportation Engineerinq S. Eliminate railroad crossing and no roads running parallel to railroad tracks, 6, Serve the property east of railroad track via collector street where alignment can be adjuster,. 7. Need densities, number of units, net. acreages fiyr each category of land Use. 8. Subject to zoning approval, 9, Oft-site improvements may be required following' zoning analysis. 10. Recommend Traffic impact study. F. Fire 1, Fire hydrants required every 300 feet for industrial zoning and every 6001 roc multi-family zoning. 2. Must provide an all weather driving surface on not leas than 20 feet of unobstructed width, with, adequate roadway turning radius capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus before construction begins. 3. Fire hydrants and water system must be operational before construction begins. 4. The access roadway shall be extended to within 150, feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. 5, Uniform Firid Code, 1976, is applicable. d. Parks and Recreation This area is currently not being served by a neighborhood park. Strongly suggest that provisions be made for adequate open space to serve multi-family areas particularly. H. Lone Star aas Exiating 411 gas line oan serve this pr6posal along I-35 South. 11 00~ Dovolopotnt Review Comaitte* P,r4-Deriq4 Conference JUitie 26, 198# Page Four n a.T 6. I. 1, 'telephone service lines exist along the I-35 service road,. 2. xf developed in phases would appreciate site plans in advance. J, Cox Cable No representative was present. K. Solid Waste No;representative was present. L. Planniny'and `Coin munity Development Zoning case will be scheduled for Plann.ing and Zoning Commission meeting of July 25, 1984 if site plan and all other ;iecessary documents are gubmitted by July 5, 1984. 06,10a :L ILI PROPERTY OWNtR "PLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL zµ1703 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received _ 10 :w _ -r- c5 t' ,..,,..ter. .....r..~L r.r..~ J.- / r i r._r-.r~_r_. ..-_.._~..~._..-.r.-_••-.....___.~........_.......~.it_Lr._uw..r__J.u.~._.____a..~~_~.._ ...-.~r..a..-..____...._u..__. -.r__.__.._r.r.. iii P & 4 Minute$ Pagobef 24, 1984 Page 6 Charles Watkins stated ne was ropresentl.tiy mr, u,t„ Archer. tie stated the property is outs},ue the vity limits and we are requesting to oe anneked. tie stated the proposed is consistent with tionton ueveiop- ment'Uuide policies. lie stated lie has discussed the conditions required by ai;atf with the potitioner and tie is agreeable. o. i-1703. This Is the petitlan of Henry 5, mil.ler. Company requesting a viianyo in zoning trom rite ayridulturai (A) district to the planned uevo.Lupment iPU) district vn a 643.3 aura tract lvuatea on the nortn aide of 1A35t, approximately 1,800 test east of c,uop i88, It approvue, the planned aevelopment will permit the toilowiny usesi 57.1 acres office (u) 25,1 aoros multi-taouly (.'Jr'-z) 61.5 acres itgnr industrial (II) 95.7 acres - commeroial (C) AS, ,ypivoy atatea there were seven reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 test of the suoject property) three were returned it) favor and zero In vppositlon, Charlea watKins stated tnis is the tnird time tnat the Henry S. Miller i:ompany has tried to get this property • rezoned, He statou they have been working on this pro- )Out for the past year. He gave the location and the surround).ng land uses of the property. He stated the Henry S, Miller Company has spent a consiueraoia amount of Money for a water uistriuution plant. He stated tnis wilt nave a major positive economic impact on r.ne City of uenton. On question from Mt. ylubr, Mr. watKlns stated the reason fur two petitiona Instead of one is oecitkit%e tile property is nuc cuntiyuous, it is separated uy toe railroad traC'K. Me, Mason Haggard stated this property oacK$ up to nor ,Jroperty un the western uoundary lute anu she has lived there fur 40 yeeirs. one stared her concern wuulu ue some type of t0iolny to separate nor property from rue new development. Chair informed vos, fiaggarc tnat her property was adjoining the HSA property in the petition next on tree agenda. Cliff Simmons, a representative of the Andrews Corporation stated his concern at tills point is in regaro to uraina9c, Me. SpJ.vey stated the 300 acres controlled by the petitioners is the subject of two (2) separate zoning change requests for office (u), multi-familyY'(me-2), ooinmercial. (C), and light industrial (L1) planneu development (PO) zoning. 'Pills site is iocateu in an area uesignateci as one of three high intensity or major 40 a0tivit+ centers. She stated little or no control of intense y is proposed Lior t11'gn Intensity or major activity Centers. AVililAoillty of aaequate infra-structure is Possibly the most critical factor and the concept plan sUgg0sts balanced growtn that is planned to insure that neignournoous and low density streets are not disrupted. P b 4 Minutes Page 7 'l4, 1484 Page 7 Sne stated tnis cast) was dellie(A by tnw planning dlle, arming Commission eetrli,er tale year wtlan several utembece of the Planning and Zoning Commission ariu the Develop- Mont Review Cpmmlttee ekpcesseu resarVations at-out the amount of uhrestticted light industrial and muitl-talnlly zoning proposea In Oat request. Stan reels that tats planned development gnd the controls associated with it will ensure more ettiolent planning of the major roaus, drainage aria utility systems for this area, she stated the controls associated with a planneu development will also enable the Cumminsion to restrict certain "so- called" undesireable lano uses in this area. Bile further stated staff recommenus approval with euhuitlvna. Cnair declared the public hearing closed. Dlr. Pearson made a motion to recommend approval of 4-1703 with the following oonaltion and with tie amendment to the couditlon that delfttes the words (in building) following used Auto Parts sales) 1) The following land uses snail not be permitted In the approved Put Amusement, Commercial' (outdoor), Drag strip or commercial Racing Asphalt or Concrete batcning Plant (permanent! bricK Kiln or 't'ile Plllnt uormitory, Boarding or Rooming House Dump or sanitary r'111 Area Cemetery or Mausoleum "traction and bale of yams, Calione, atone, Clay or gavel Fairgrounds or !;x11101t Area uo-Cart TracK Halfway House Hatutlery, Poultry Hauling or storage Company Heavy machinery Sales aria Storage Home for Care of Alcoholic, Ndreotic or Psychiatric Patients 6ivestock Auction Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards Mining or Storage of reining Wastes Open Salvage Yard for Rays or Machinery, etc Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities Private Utility Shop or storage Yard Rodeo Grounds Send, Gravel or Barth sales or Storriye Staole, Commercial Rental Stable, Boarding Staple, Private Cluk) Storage aria sales of Furniture or Appliances Outside a Building Theater, Drive-Ili Tire Re-Treading or Capping Tool Rental Trailer Camp or Mouile Home Park Trailer Rental or Sales Used Auto Parts Sales seconded by Mr. Bluer and unanimously carrioa (5-U). r:. X04, This is the petition of Henry S. Miller Company requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the planned development (PD) district on a 57 acre tract located on the east side of Loop 26b, II~ PLANNING AND ZQkNO COMMISSION RECOMMENOATION TO THt; CITY COUNCIL Tot Denton City Council Case No.: Z-1704 Meeting Dates November 20, 1984 GENERAL INFORMATION - Applicants Ralph Collins, representing Henry S, Miller Company, Inc. 2001 Bryan Tower, 30th Floor Dallas, TX 75201 Status of Applicants Owner Requested Actions Change In zoning from the agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classification. If approved, the planned development will permit the following usess 30.1 acres - light industrial (LI) 27.0 acres - multi-family (MF-2) Purpose: Unknown Location and Size: A 57.1 acre tract located on the east side of Loop 288, approximately 2200 feet north of I-35E Existing Land Uses Vacant Surrounding Land Use and zoning: North - Agricultural, Greenhouse, Single Familyl A South - Church, Denton Towne Center, Agriculturalt At LI, PD-28 East - Agricultural, Andrew Corporations At LI West - Golden Triangle Malin PD-6 Denton Development Guides Site is located in a high intensity area. (Case # z-1704) Page Two SPECIAL INFORMATION Public Facilitiest Engineers representing the petitioners met with the Development Review Committee to discuss infra-structure capabilities in the area of this re- quest. Specific comments are attached for review but, generally, adequate streets, utilities, and drainage facilities are in place or available for extension. ANALYSIS The three hundred acres controlled by the petitioners is the subject of two (2) separate zoning change requests for office (0), multi-family (MV-2)0 commeraini (C), and light industrial (LI) planned development (PD) zoning. This site is located in an area designated as one of three high intensity or major activity centers. Little or no control of intensity is proposed for high intensity or major activity centers. Availability of adequate infra-structure is possibly the most critical factor and the concept plan suggests balanced growth that is planned to insure that neighborhoods and low density streets are not dis- rupted. In general, major activity centers are expected to be the major industrial, commercial and employment centers of the city. More particularly, land use diversity, including high density housing, is encouraged in these areas both as a buffer for adjacent low intensity areas, and a way of promoting trans- portation balance and energy conservation by providing housing near jobs and serviges. The Golden Triangle Mal]. major activity center is identified as the dominant center for the city in the Denton Development Guide. Staff feels that this planned development and the controls associated with it will ensure more efficient planning of the major roads, drainage and utility systems for this area than is possible with unrestricted zoning. The controls associated with a planned development will also enable the City Council to restrict certain "so-called" undesirable land uses in this area. (Case Z-1704) Page Three RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1704, by a vote of 5-0, with the following conditionsr 1. The following land uses shall not be permitter) In the approved PDs Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or Commercial Racing Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent) Brick Kiln or Tile Plant Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House Dump or Sanitary, Fill Area Cemetery or Mausoleum Extraction and Sale of sand, Caliche, Stone, Clay or Gravel Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area Go-Cart Track Halfway House Hatchery, Poultry Hnuling or Storage Company Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric Patients Livestock Auction Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes Open Salvage Yard for Stags or Machinery Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard Rodeo Grounds Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage Stable, Commercial Rental Stable, Boarding Stable, Private Club Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances Outside a Building Theater, Drive-In Tire Re-Treading or Capping Tool Rental Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park Trailer Rental or Sales Used Auto Parts Sales 2. There will be a six (6) foot solid fence between the Henry S, Miller property and the railroad track and between the Henry S. Miller property and the Mason Haggard property. (Case # Z-1704) Page Four ALTERNATIVES - I., Approve petition with conditions 2, Approve petition without conditions 3. Approve petition with additional conditions 4. Deny petition ___-__-_M..-._. ATTACHMENTS - _ - 1. Map 2. PD Concept Plan 3, Memorandum from City Engineer 4, Develop,nent Review Committee minutes of June 261 1984 S. Reply Form Totals 6. Property Owner List.: 7, Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of October 24, 1984 __________________w__..--.__--------------- _ 0342j G~ r s-loo V L1. f 00 } 00 00 .`.``rte ,Tj•>~~ r/~' ` 00 S-,Oo 01 'OD 0 l\ ' f. \ \ ..`mow SIN -49 S~ 42 TI, { sF- rI 11. i7 R •i ~ i~~ L r.l_~ o- I ~ Q t_T'1 x.....1.1 1 ~:E. Tr, SF- 10 P -ae y 1 , - p~ L50 END 'PD-MF-'2' 1,V411-FAM1lYEl(IAI.FEM1 66.1 A0. P r-1 'p0-O' OIAfNN[oo6vElOPM6Nt 57,1 AC. 'p0„Cr C 1OMICYE[q CPMV60" N 1' 06.7 AC. l--.J 'PD-LI' PNbU1/RIApplEV6l0P11EN1 01.6 A0. + Mf. A0.&16 TOTAL. 300.5 AC, 11 Pw' e, C f I ` ~ V10"TY MAP ,p wlr h ~U it . V 1, S4~ ~r1'J J ~THAtlI' ~ q~/~ PD11 81.1 A0. 001 A6 ~ •7 _7 Ah if.0 AC. 1 is V~ a0^IN PO l1 ' to 1 AC c ''•k r;• fry MAI 44 0 At:. P°-O TRAOr -•_.]1.,: _ +1 1' • %243.4 AC. PD-C • PP•0 gALLky !1 ao•c ~b:o.7a Ac r o AC rr AI`~+, xr- Ya.. w•.~ .7./• .,1 - 17 nrnu••7tlllni 1 ZONING EXHIBIT »F,VELUp1{tl JWN WE 001 N N WEAo 11N1~RR 30f~ 5 ACRES-DENTON, TEXAS 2 AL BRYAN 71 101b Fl.OI)It IlA1. ~ LAS,TEXAS TEXAS ~ wu~rArroeux~,wc .MM ryJWr 1 1 ~..,-,may t ` t; GITYofogrAfrom, rgxas MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 06NTON, TEXAS 76201 / T8'L,6PN0NF. (817).%6.8200 M E M O R A N D U M M Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer DATE: October 17, 1984 RE: Z-1703 And Z-1704 The tract has a heavy impact on Denton with relation to infra structure needed to serve its fu~~ure Ojos. Three major roads bound the tract with the railroad on the other side. I-35 already has adequate right-of-way. Loop 288 is a major arterial with 120' oP right-of-way. The pavement section probably already meets our requirements, Mayhill Road is s1lown to have hoop 288 rerouted into it which will require 120' right-of-way,, Alignment to be adjusted to meet the I-35 underpass. Colorado Boulevard is a secondary arterial, right-of-way of 801, Alignment shown on the plan meets our previous comments. Developer to build 17' minimum on Mayhill and Loop 288. The City to participate in 7' - 111 in conjunction. Colorado Boulevard will require the developer to build a large enough section to meet his internal traffic needs, part of tae median may have to be instructed as it is to be divided in i,heir proposed road and in the' existing road to the west. All ether internal collectors to be developer funded. Drainage needs to have a major detention facility constructed to hold runoff increases in a pond so the railroad culverts will not have to be upgraded. This will maintain historic runoff discharges downstream for the larger storms that could cause damage. The tracts on the northeast drain to the northwest under Loop 288, Detention should also be used here to maintain use of the existing 72" culvert. A major channel will run through the property with design size channel maintain the green space, Please advise if further information is requested. ~~erry ark City Engineer ~lir~uta« Dev*lopm"nt Review committee June 26, 1454 DRC Members Presoint: Jerry Clark, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison, Wayne 009S141P4 Don McLaughlin, Koorosh 01yai, Tomsty Stone, Tex Stewart, Pablo Rubio, David Ham Developer Present: Mika Reynolds Engineers Present: David McCarver, Phillip Patterson XXI, Review' of Pre-Design Conference - 304,9 acres of proposed PD land use A. Engineering 1, Drainage - (detention at lower end) leave culverts as is -'no increase of 'existing flows - show phases in PD 2. No 611 sewer. 3. T intersection - Colorado and western north-south street - 801 right-ol-way 4. No streets across railroad - put collector on northeast corner -curve up to new Loop 288 above Page Rd, - Mayhill/State School Rd. - match with 120' right-of-way for relocation. 5, Make Mayhill concrete as other side - Allen Estates - is to be concrete. 6. Minimum 241 roads (city collectors) 1098 42 - 1/2 pavement when used. 7. Schedule phases of road in PD ordinance. B. Water and Sewer 1. Water lines are acceptable provided industrial area is served with 3000 g.p,m, factor. 2. Sewer lines to be sized using 125 g,p,d, per capita x 4 peaking factor. 3. Need .1,6+ easement for offaite water line and sewer line. Double manhole sewer line to 21" and 2411 outfall's. 11inu~et t~wlo egt gevi,ew Comaittee Pro-Desigh Conference Jruae 44o 1984 Peg* Two B, Water and Sew*& (Cont'inued) 4. 9ubait letter requesting offsite pro rata agreement on sanitary sewer, S. Minimum size for water is 811 and sanitary sewer size is 104. C. Electric 1, Electric service available, 2. Electric installdtioa will be per City of Denton general requirements underground commercial industrial Customers electric service. 3. The 138 KV transmission lines easement noeds to be shown on plan; the two pole structures shown on your topographical maps were removed several years ago and replaced with the single structure 138 KV lines. Suggest a boulevard be designed around the 138 KV lines considering the easement restrictions 4. The utility easement along the north side of the MKT railroad tracks need to be shown on plans. 5, The electric utility department will need to build a main distribution line (13.8 KV) across, D. Building Inspection Driveway access from major arterials shall be limited as stated in Subdivision and Development Standards Ordinance. E. Transportation Engineering 1. Mayhill is primary major arterial with 120, of right-of-way. 2. Mayhill (future Loop 288) must match existing state School Road. 3. Colorado is sadondaxy major arterial with 801 of right-of-way. 4. Colorado should tie into the street off of 1.36 as a T intersection, 0ovelopoo" At Review Counitteo Pro-bo siqu Conf'ore.400 Jupe 36, 1964 Page Three E. Transportation Engineering 5, Eliminate railroad oroseinq and no roads running parallel to railroad tracks. 6, Serve the property east of railroad track via collector street where alignment can be adjusted. 7. Used densitiese number of units, net acreages for each category of land use. S. Subject to zoning approval. 9. Oft-site improvements may be required following zoning analysis. 10. Recommend Traffic Impact Study. F. Fire 1. Fire hydrants required every 300 feet for industrial zoning and every 6001 for multi-family zoning, 2. Must provide an all weather driving surface on not lose than 20 feet of unobstructed width, with adequate roadway turning radius capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus before construction begins. 3. Fire hydrants and water system must be operational before construction begins. 4. The access roadway shall be extended to within 150, feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. S. Uniform Fire Code, 1976, is applicable, a. Parks and Recreation This area is currently not being served by a neighborhood park, Strongly suggest that provisions be made for adequate open space to serve multi-family areas particularly. H. Lone , V ,Ar das Existinq 411 gas line can serve this proposal along 1.35 South. D*Ve14pMegt ~AV3,iw Co~iCte pz~-r?~tigp Contexendm JUAO x6, 1984 page Four 1. Telephone service lines exist along road tho 1-35 eas.vice . 2, rt develops," in phases w advance, ould appreciate site plans in J. Cox Cable No representative was present. K. Solid Waste No represontative was present. L. Planning and Community Development Zoning case will be scheduled for PlannSng and Zoning Commission meeting of°July 25, 1984 it site plan and all other necessary documents are submitted by July 5, 1984, 0010a 777- PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1704 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received i INI- 7 r ' _-rte III[ I ~ P b 4 Minutes uctober 114, 1984 Page 7 6110 stated tnls case was danleu uy Lou Piannlny 411U coning QommLislon earlier this year Wnen several memovv s ut the Plannlny ana 4unlny Commis9LJn anu the uavelop- ment Review Com'-'•ttee expresseu reservations duout toe amOllnt of nnCOSCClcted llgnt inaustr,tal anu multl•tamlly Zoning proposes In tnat request, btafr reels that tnls planned uevelopment Anc ens controls aseooiatea wltn it Will ensure more efficient planning Of the major ruaus, arainaye and utility Systems for this area, she st,ite-l the controls associated with a plaoneu developmene will also enable the Commission to restrict certain "su- cailea" undeslreable Lana uses in tnis area. Soe furtner stateo staff recommenus approval with cunuitiuns. Cnair declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Pearson mace a motion to reeommena approval of 4-1703 with the following condition and with the amendment to the condition that deletes the words (in bullaing) following used Auto Parts dales) 11 The following land uses snail not be permitteu in the approved Pul Amusemotit, Commercial loutaovrl, Urag strip or Commercial Racing Asphalt or Concrete Satcnlny Plant ipermanentl dricK Klin or Tile Plant uormltory, Boarding or Rooming House Uump or Sanitary 0'111 area Cemetery or mausoleum 6xtra4jtiun anu sale or banu, Caliene, Stone, clay or uravel FalrgCounus or txnlblt Area Uo-Lart TracK Halfway House Hatchery, Poultry Hauling or Storage Company deavy Machinery bales and Storaye Home for Care or Aiconollc, ,Narcotic or Psycnlatrlc Patients L,IvestocK Auction LivestocK r'eeaing Plant, Pens or Yarus Mining or Storage of .~Rining wastes open Salvage YaCa to, nags or machinery, etc Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities Private utility Shop or Storage Yara Rodeo Grounas Sana, Gravel or Earth Sales or storage Stable, Commercial Rental Stable, doaraing Staple, Private Clut, Storage ana Sales or Furniture or appliances Outside a dulldrny Theater, Detve-in Tire Re-'1'reaaing or Capping 111001 Rental 'l`railer Camp or Moulle Home ParK 't'railer Rental or Sales Usea Auto Parts Sales Seconded by Mr. 6'luor and unanimously aarrlea (5-u), Z-1704. This is the petition of Henry S. Mr7.1er Company requesting a anange in zoning from the agricultural (Al aistriet to the planned development (PD) district on a 57 acre tract located on the east side of Loop 288, F a G t•fillut@$ v0t(1beC d4r l9dq Page d appeoximjt-illy 2,[UU teot north ut i-s5L, li aipruvoa, the plalule(l developmont will permit the tolto winy land usesi 30.1 acres light industrial (1,1) e7.u acres multi i'amily me-t) ass. Spivey stateu there wet:u seven rep;.y torms malted to property ownrrs within 20U feet of tnkk HUL)jeo(' propurty) tneoe wore returned in favor, zero in opposition ano one Undecided. Ar. Charles Watkins statou Ile was representlny the h6m Company and tnAs proposal is north of the railroad track. lie stated Ae would iiKe to roguust a u0nuition to be considerocl by the Commissiun, that a solid sureeniny along the border of As, Hagyard'e property is well as along tna railroad track bo ureUted. !vo one spoke in tuvor or in opposition to the request. Ar, LaB•orte a8kud 08, Ildyyard It a six (b) toot soilu wood fence would snttsry. Ms, riaggard answureu, yes it woulu. Ms. Spivey stated thin is basically t)lY same as the pseviouLi petition and it also is a nrk;l: intensity area. Sl;e skated staft recommends approval. Mr, Sldo,: made a motion to recommend approval of G-1704 wit) the following conditions) 1) Che following land uses snail not be permitteu in the approved P0, ATlu5ement, Commercial (outdoor), Urag btrip or Commercial Racing Asphalt or Concrete Batci~lny plant ipermanent) Brick Kiln or 't'ile Plant uormitory, Boarding or Rooming House Uumll or Sanitary ✓•'ill Area cemetery or mausoloum Extraotion and sale of sand, Caliche, Gtono clay or Gravel r'alr.yrt,unan or rxnioit Area Go-Cart 'i'racK Halfway Mouse Hatchery, Poultry Hauling oe SLOrayd Comtlany Heavy machAnery bales and btorayi) dome for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatr;c Patients Livestock Aultion LiVestoaK k'6L01ng Plant:, pens or Yeirus ,•iining or Stotage of dining wastes, Upon salvage Yard for Rays or raacninory, etc petroleUnl Collecting or storaye r'aciiities Private Utility Shop or btoraye Yarc Rodeo Grounds Sand, caravel or Ear tit sales o); stcraye Stable, Commur.cial hental stable, Boarding Staple; Private Club storage and Sales of ¢'urni.Lure or Appliances vutsiae a Building Theater, Urive-in 'l'ire tie-Treadinu or Capping Tool Rental Y b G ~~unutea October 24, 1904 Page 9 'Frailer Camp or kgouile Homo Park 'Frailer Hetntal or gales Used Auto Parts Sales e, There will be a alx (b) foot 80110 ronoe between the 8011ry 5, Miller proporty ana th,: railroad traux gnu siotween the Henry d, eliti.er Property and the Aasoh liagyard Property, SeoonLled by Mr, Pearson anu unanimously carried l5.ut, i NO, AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIAS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, roceived and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a iiesiVnated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids ate the lowest responsible bids for the materials equipment, supplies or sorviees as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided to the City Budget for the appropriation of funds co 'oe used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that avert' act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shell, be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for materials, equipment, supplies, or services, ahown in the "Bid Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids foss such items; BID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR MOUNT 9344 1 ASEA Electric $260,410.00 ` 9344 _ 2 Clark, Inc $172,734,00 9344 2a Clark $ 4,372.00 9349 All Industrial Automatic Trans. $192,263.00 9349 All Basic Waste `i 49,432.00 9350 All Multi-Information Systems $ 56,966,00 SECTION It. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and Agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or s'evvicea in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the `specified sums contained in tha Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. PAGE 1 A N ECT QN 10 BID NU_,MJR 1TE, N0, '16. NDOR M.NT 9353 1 Lone Stap Peterbilt $ 69,941,00 9353 2 G b H Manufacturing $ 14,078.00 9357 All BMCO $122- 9359 All Garland Uniform 8,126,65 $ _ ~ .w_ 9360 All Marsh-McBfrney $ 71177,00 9361 1 Texas Hospital Supply $ 4,268.43 9361 2 Dixie USA Inc, $ 1,277,97 9361 3 H.L. Moore $ 189.00 9361 4 First Responder Medical $ 20455,93 9362 y All Participation Bid $ 38,228.00 ~ 9363 1 r Trans Tex Supply $ 6,600,00 E 9363 2 _Ferguson Universal $ 81515.00 9363 3 rr Ferguson Universal $ 405,00 ! 9363 4 Ferguson Universal $ 545.00 9363 5 Ferguson Universal $ 587,50 9363 6 Trans Tex Supply $ 4,707.90 9363 7 W Trans Tex Supply $ 40820.90 SECTION 114. That should the City and persona submitting approved and accepted Items and of the submitted bids wish to enter Into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, appproval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designatdd reprasentative to hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto) provided that thu written contract is In accordance with the terms, conditions, speoifi.cations, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the abova numbered items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the appr.,>vi,d bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION Vt That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 20 day of November 1984. RICHARD 0. STEWART, HAYOK CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CW.MTTE , CITY S CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PACC 2 CITY C()UNCIL AGENDA BACK-11P SUWARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N: Consent SUBJECT: BID x+9344 POWER TRANSFORMER AND SUBSTATION SU14MARY: This bid is for the purchase of a 15/20/25 MVA power transformer, a set of 15 KVA switch ear and a 138XV substation. The new substation will serve the area along South I-35. The exact site has not been determined, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: Electric Utility Board Funds Account Number 611-OD8.0253-9217 Capital Improvements to the Electric System RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated bid meeting specifications for each item. Item 1 Power Transformer ASEA Electric $260,410.00 Item 2 Switchgear Sub Station Clark Inc, $172,734,00 Item 2a Opt, Switchgear Equip, Clark Inc, $ 4,372.00 Total Bid Award $437,516.00 The Utility Board reveiwed this bid October 29, 1984, and recommends approval, EXHIBIT: bulation eet SUBMITTED BY: Tom D, Shaw, C.P,M, Assistant Purchasing Agent dID 1 es~~ HID onurR jwjSFOgj;A/U&Uk( OAItNtinte6mr la. 1414 2 P.M. 04NCRAL PRIESTER HCORAW- KUNLIIAN CLARK BUTLER A$EA ESTINONOUS ELECTRIC SUPPLY EDISON SUBSTATION A LAUD ELECTRIC ACCOUNT 1 INC; 7'F!A"bl,BZ'liT _ _ ;1 DO 2Y ' V6!NTi n`ND0w""', Tr&mfereer ('72,734,00 84r. Cabloation 174, 423,168.0Q 4$1 600.00 n __4137 2,00 i CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP SUWARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0: Consent SUBJECT: bid #9348 SIDE LOADING REFUSE TRUCKS SUMMARY. This bid is for the purchase of three side loading residential refuse trucks, They are motor pool replacements for (1) 1979 and (2) 2980 trucks, ACTION REQUIPED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-85 Budget Funds for the Lease/Purchase of Equipment Solid Waste Account Number 630-002-0801-8508 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid of Industrial Automatic Transmissions, bidding a Belgium-Standard Shu-Pak truck in the amount of $64,121,00 each, Total cost $192,363,00, EXHIBIT: Tabulation S et SUBMITTED BY: < ~ Tom D. Shaw, C,P.M, Assistant Purchasing Agent v 31D # 9348 BID TITLF Sfb~ ~DADINC R~xU,S>~rRIICKS OPENCD ~lovemher 6 1484A~ I,D.S BASIC E. S. S. 1, BASIC 1.A.T.S. ►IASr~ I,a,r,s. ACCOUNT P WASTE N1 ST Ili N2 # TY, Y' T pff._ PT N ---,?~$~~J VENDOR VENDOR VI;NDOIt VENDOR VFNDOIt VENDOR V.NDOR 1 3 Refuse rruc s 77 756.00 76,756,00 69,473,00 72,626,00 65,350,00 64,121.00 Del Ivery _ 215-245 170-200 45-50 Days '160-170 165 Days 45-60 DaysT dys ays ays , t i 1 1 ' A I it CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACKUP SUWARY SHEET i DATE OF MERTING: November 20, 1984 3 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0: Consent SUBJECT: BID 09349 REAR LOADING REFUSE TRUCK SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of one rear loading li refuse truck, This unit is a motor pool repla a3- ment for a 1981 tear loading truck. This truck is used for special pick up and as a back up i~ unit for the regular residential refuse fleet, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funds for this purchase have been budgeted as a lease/purchase package. Solid Waste Account Number 630-002-0801-8508 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification of Basic Waste in the amount of $49,432,00 for the truck and body combination, (Bid 02 from Basic Waste,) EXHIBIT: Tab~ulatiion S eet SUBMITTED 8Y: C~=• ~~s"_ _ Tom D, Shaw, C.P,M.. As:;istant Purchasing Agent BID DID REAA LOA2010 R F TRU.K I.D.S. BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC E. S. S.I. CAI.VERT ~BII.L 11411ANEY ' OPEN NOY#mbfr 6A 1904 .ptip, , HASTE WASTE WASTE WASTE 1110YOR ~ UTTER INT'L ACCOUNT 11 11 02 03 04 CO. FORD VEN R vgmbiS $ _ w VE' R V'ENlf'OK- IT --~I~~ oh`PbafF--- v `RSbrE- ruck Cah/Chay;ls to,2 .STD .33. _ St,l 5.052. U 14~9~ ; ,1natton 1 d z ¢~slg1 . ,~Q l4 2. 20 4 4 .9l,4Q1,4~ ~4,42i,~tst 44a?:'~44 Deltvr J0 Oa s 16 Da s 150 Days JO DAYS 1.50 DAYS 120-150 _ 4Q•iz{~_ 12g oars 16, a f Ee r OAy$ _ Receipt o i _17111 y, , CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING; November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent SUBJECT: BID #9350 COMPUTER PACKAGE FOR POLICE SUMMARY: This bid is for a Police Computer Package (Law Enforcement Management Information System), This system is to be compatible and connect to the regional and state information systems for law enforcement, We sent out bids to several bidders, but we received only one bid from Multi-Information Systems, Inc, of Arlington, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS: Budget 100-007-0042-9106 RECOMMLNDATION: We recommend with the Police that this bid be awarded to Multi-Information Systems, Inc, of Arlington for the bid amount of $39,225,00. This system will be purchased on a Lease/Purchase contract for 36 month at $1,298.00 per month, other purchase costs aro listed on items 7 R 8 for the total amount of $7,600.00 and maintenance as shown for the total amount of 10,140.00 per year, EXHIBITS; Tabulation Sheet P ce D pa ment Memo SUBMITTED BY: hn Marshall, C.P.M. urchasing Agent hID H 9354 SID TITLE CoAjpUTER PAQ AGE FOR POLICE MULTI MONTHLY OPENED Noyember 8,19$4 2 pm, INFORMATION LEASE/ SYSTEMS PURCHASE ACCOUNT P!,_100-007-0042-9106 TOTAL COST N TY, S IPTI VENDOR VENDOR VENDOK VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR 1 1 Central Processing Unit 26,000,00 861.00 2 9 Video Display Terminals 6000,00 209.00 3 1 I/O Expansion Boards 19326.00 43,00 ZOOM 23.00 6 2 Dot Matrix Printer 22900.00 96.0 6 1 Letter Quality Printer 29000.00 66.00 } Total 399226.00 1,298.00 L-~ Software 6.000.00 8 Training 1,600.00 9 installation I 10 Full Service 10,140,00 r 845.00 Mo f CITY OV DENTON MEMORANDUM T0i Tom Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent PROMi Gary L. Matheson, Administrative Captain, Police Department 5UBJECTi Police Computer Package (Bid #9350) UTEi November 12, 1984 We have reviewed the proposal of Multi-Information Systems, Inc., regarding our requested computer package. We recommend that their proposal be accepted and awarded at your earliest convenience. /(a3 ar L. Matheson dministrative Captain Police Department CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUWARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent SUBJECT BID #9353 ROLL-OFF TYPE REFUSE TRUCK SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a 64000 GVW diesel powered truck cab/chassis and roll-off frame. ThIs unit is a motor pool replacement for a 1979 model truck. It is used by the Solid Waste Department for pick up of the 30 Cubic yard refuse containers, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-85 Budget Funds for Lease/Purchase of Solid Waste Equipment Account Number 630-002-0802-8508 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specification with the best possible delivery schedule. Item 1 to Lone Star Peterbilt for a 1985 Model 310 Peterbilt in the amount of $59,941,00 with delivery in 7 to 10 days. The bid of Calvert Motor Co, fails to meet specified engine requirements and has a 180-220 day delivery schedule. The lesser price offered by Lone Star Peterbilt meets specifications but has a 140 day delivery schedule, Item 2 to G A N Manufacturing in the amount of $14,078,00 with delivery in 18 days after receipt of truck chassis, Total cost for the truck and frame is $74,019,00. EXHIBIT: T. lation Sheet SUB14ITTED BY: C om aw,G.P.M, Assistant Purchasing Agent DID 1. 4163 DID - - ROLL-OFF REUSE TRUCK IO.S, 0 to M 0 1 N ENVIRO- MACK BOND CALVERT AC6L LONE UIIE 0►KN Novj#Ar B, 1941 2,o,M, MFG. CO. MFO. CO. MENTAL YRUCK$ EQUIPMENT MOTOR UTTER STAR TAR MES INC CO. CO. FORD DETERBILT ETERBILT ACCOUNT 1 _ SERVICE Il 2 173mmmm: IVXNDQ#t VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR Truvk C& (Chassis NIB 61 N1, 1 63,638,00 66,496.00 $9,773.0 4.941-00 2 1 Roll-Off Fl-ow 11 950,00 14,070,00 14,070.22 14 14,078.00 f1i2 go, so oollydry #1 60-90 Days 10 Days 120 Uyj 180. 220 ok 10-120 I)AY1 0411 r AMC 1 10 Days 18 1 D CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SWORY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N: Consent SUBJECT: 810 #9357 Commercial Refuse Truck SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of two (2) side loading commercial refuse trucks. They are motor pool replacements and used to service the "green containers" on the commercial installations, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-85 Budget Funds for Lease/Purchase of Solid Waste Equipment Account Number 620-002-0802-8508 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid meeting specification and having an acceptable delivery schedule, of EMCO in the amount of $62,273.40 each, They have offered a deduction of $1093,00 if we will accept a white cab instead of orange, This reduces the purchase price to $61,079,64 per truck, Total order is $122,159,28 with delivery in 60-90 days. The other lower bids offered fail to meet minimum required specifications and/or have a delivery schedule we cannot accept. EXHIBIT: T bulation S t SUBMITTED BY: om D, aw, C. , Assistant Purchasing Agent AID 1_ flay DID QH98CIAL REFUSE TRUCK ENCO E11C0 Emco £MCO ENCO 11CHATT CALVERT BILL 1AHANEY OPEN Norarbar e, 1984 2 n,wt !1 /2 13 04 06 WTOR UTTER 111T1. ACCOUN'T' I CO. FORD VENSa .a1u,DO Total combination 1 6 2 62,27140 76 126,31 $1,169,01 60j480.16 62,2L4,29 60,983.71 r llvrr /l 30-60 Da 120.160 120 Days l4 Days 46 Days 90 Da s 120.160 160 Days 160 Days ays ys _ Days Days i I i I i CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent SUBJECT: BID #9359 FIRE DEPARTMENT UNIFORMS SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of uniforms for the fire department, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984.85 Budget Funds Account Number 100-006-0057-8108 Fire Department Uniforms RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of Garland Uniform in the total amount of $8,126,65 with delivery in 30 days after receipt of order, EXHIBIT; Ta lation. Sheet SUBMITTED BY: Tom D, haw, , , . Assistant Purchasing Agent HID l1__~__ 9359. BID TITLE UNIFORM$ - FIR DEPARTMENT OPENED November 81 1984 2 p.m, DONIVAN JB BATTLE FACTORY GARLAND SALES UNIFORMS ACCOUNT A QTY~_. ITEM D S T 0 VENDOR, VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDO VENDOR VENDOR Pants27,00 28.96 30.20 2g7Q } 2 -AL t 10.00 10.50 0 j 9.51 I ~ JQ Shirts 10.50 10.60 11.00 10.25 I 4, 9Q_ Shirts 2,5 2, 13. 11-95 6 20 Uniform Shirts 10.50 10,50 11,00 10,23 6 16 Jackets/HD 60.00 62.95 64,90 57,25 I Delivery 60 Days 30-45 Days 30 Days 30 Days i Total 8,705.00 80950146 9 419,40 8.126.65 r_____ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20,1 984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMN: Consent SUBJECT: BID #9360 FLOW MEASURING EQUIPMENT SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of special flow measuring equipment for use by the Water and Waste Water Division of the Utility Department, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-86 Fiscal Budget Account #620-008-0471-9104 Capital Equipment Water A Sewer Department RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder, Marsh-McBirney, Inc, of Gaithersburg, MD, ire the total amount of $7,177.00. They are the only known manufacturer; and therefore, the only known source of this particular flow measuring equipment, EXHIBIT: T ulatioti S eet SUBMITTED BY: Tom D. Shaw, C. . Assistant Purchasing Agent :SC D Il _..9364,. Sill TITL15 , PLOW 1-1E SUSINO LOUIPt-JENT MARSH- OPENED November 8, 1964 2 p,m, MCBIRNEY ACCOUNT N p QTY, EM S PTI PNDOkq_ VENDQk _ VENDOkENDOR V'NDOR VENE)bg VENDOR 1 Level Velo it S ns 14.95Q.00 I I 2 1 Proce s r I's 0.00 3 2 Batter 36.00 4 1 Rechar er 100.00 5 1 6" Band 90.00 ' 6 1 8" Band 90.00 7 1 10" Band 90.00 ` 8 1 12" Band 90,00 9 3 3" Adaptor 25,00 10 2 12" Adaptor 50.00 11 1 Carrying Case NZC Prei ht j Total 7,177.00 Delivery 90 Davs i 4 I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SLW,4ARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent SUBJECT: BID #9361 MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE SUMMARY: This bid is for some 66 items of routine medical supplies to replenish the material stocked by the Fire Department Emergency Medical Services. The quantity request is an estimated 4 to 6 month supply for most items ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984.85 Budget Funds Account Number 100-006-0051-8106 Fire Department Medical Supplies RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the loest bidder for each item: Items 2, 7, 0, 10, 11, 12, 139 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 34, 35, 40, and 41 to Texas Hospital Supply in the amount of $4,268,43, Items 9, 33, 36, 38, 39, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, and 59 to Dixie USA Inc. In the amount of $1,277.97, Items 499 50, 51, 52, 57, 61, 62, 63, 64, and 66 to H. L. Moore in the amount of $189,00. Items 1, 3, 4, 52 6, 14, 22, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 329 42, 43, 44, 459 469 47, 489 and 60 to First Responder Medical in the amount of $2,455,93, No bids were received on items 16, 189 37 and 65. tat bid rd is $6,191.83, SUBMITTED BY: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Assistant Purchasing Agent CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM N: Consent Agenda SUBJECT: Bid N 9362 Woodhill Apt, Sewer Main Participation SUMMARY: This bid is for the City participation in an over- sized sewor line for Woodhill Apartments. This bid was picked up by over 12 vendors, however we received only four bids, We have evaluated this bid and find the low overall difference to be as shown on the attached sheet, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Utility Funds RECONMENDATION: We recommend this participation be approved for the estimated extended total difference of $38,228,00, as per the estimated low footage price. EXHIBITS: Tabulation sheet, SUB14ITTED BY: r CJO n J, Iarshal 4urch sing Agent u i u rr.__.._y .s u SID TITLE Dickerson Alb®neslus Lightning Hall-Alber. Eveluate~ Sewer Mains wa0dhi11 Apts. Construct, Construct, Construct, Construct, s mate OPENED 11-6-84 2100 P.M. Co, Co. Totals ACCOUNT !1 Participation # QTY. I.T41 pESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR 1 635 ' 8.00 5,00 9108 9.20 31,750. 2 15.0' 8,00 10.00 11,00 10,00 1,500, 1 y 3 204' 17.50 4.00 5.50 10,00 816, 4 230' 72,50 11.00 11,00 ,00 2,530, 5 204' 7.95 8.00 6.60 15.00 1,632, 1 TOTALS 113,95 38.00 43.18 44,20 38,228, Total Participation on the estimat d footage on each item $38,228,00 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent SUBJECT: BID #9363 WATER & SEWER SUPPLIES SU*tARY: This bid is for the purchase of replacement warehouse stock. The bid is for water meter boxes, valve boxes and fire hydrants, The quantities are approximately a 90-120 day supply. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: Working Capital Inventory Account Number 710-004-0598-8709 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications as listed: Item 1 to Transtex Supply @ $22.00 ea, $ 6,600.00 Item 2 to Ferguson Universal @ $86.15 ea. _ $ 8,575,00 Item 3 to Ferguson Universal @ $5.40 ea, $ 405.00 Item 4 to Ferguson Universal @ $10.90 ea. _ $ 545.00 Item 5 to Ferguson Universal @ $11.76 ea. = $ 587.50 Item 6 to Yranstex Supply @ $470.79 ea. _ $ 4007.90 Item 7 to Transtex Supply @ $482.09 ea. _ $ 41820.90 Bid #9363 Total = $26,241.30 Note: Item 3, 4, 6 6 must be compatible. EXHIBIT: %abllatio S eet SUBMITTED BY: „'lam-~_s Tom D. Shaw, . . i. Assistant Purchasing Agent BID BID TITLE _WATER 6 SEWER SUPPLIES THE ATLAS METROPLEX FERGUSON TRANS TEX ROHON CO. UTILITY UTILITY UNIVERSAL SUPPLY CO. OPENED Nauember 1984 2 n.m. SUPPLY SUPPLY CO, INC. ACCOUNT rJ TY ITEAf DESCRTPTT.O VENDOR VENDOR _ V NDO VENDOR VEtJDOR VEN ORVENDOR ,,I~ ter Box With Lid I A25.20 25.40 .30 22,QO 2. 1 Meter Box With Lid 55A 90-00 81.20 86.20 86.75 87.83 ' 3. 75 Li On1 Valve ox 4615 7.20 5,6 7120 5.40 5,4 4. 50 Top Section 461S 11.55 10.08 11.55 10.90 10.89 5, 50 Base 461S 12.26 10,08 12.25 11.75 11.74 6. 10 Fire Hydrant 3'8 538.44 N8 550.67 475,00 470.79 7: 10 Fire Hydrant 39 651.38 NB 563.90 486.00 482.09 ; I Del er 1-4 WK 7-21 Days 30 D Days 110 Days -6 WK H~dmnts-- 1-2 WK Balance ; , All or None f i ' f , 1 r • ( i I NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS: PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improve. ments in accordance with the procedures of state law and city ordinanes; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invita- tions", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications attached hereto are hereby accept¢d and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 9341 Red River Construction Co. $277,700.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above competititve bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the PACE l person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorzied to excecute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantitites and specified sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and In the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 20 day of November 1964 . CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST; ALLEN, MOM CITY StGREMY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM., JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY, PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 1984 COUNCIL AGENOA ITEM Consent SUBJECT: BID #9341 HIGH SERVICE PUMP STATION EXTENSION SUMMARY: This bid was sent out by our engineers, Freese & Nichols, Inc. We received eight bids as shown on the tabulation sheet, This bid has gone to the Utilities Board for their recommendation, ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council SOURCE OF FUNDS: C.I.P. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Red River Construction Co, at $277040.00. EXHIBIT: TaWlation -Wet SUBMITTED BY: zoiq aAn a shadl> C,P,M, urchasing Agent C~iTY OP O~NTOk MAS W YCR'WORK IMP~OYEMENTS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NOR B" PUMP STATION ERTENSION 010 M341 TABU LAT ION OP B 1 DS 61ds Opened 2100PM Nor. 6, 1964 n frefsf aAd lllohol3~ lno. , Consulting Cn9inedrs $a cG 1. Construotlon of M.S. Puna Ste. EKtMSion Coe 104 As Swifiedl lump $uh $ ,0 s s j ~O s . 1~3 2, For addfd or W OtW amounts. a. 1600 PSI Concrete Unit Price S~Gd 25 C.Y. E_.fDd' - /~,5'QD,. ED - QOd. _ E. /OD. DD E CAD. _ _ b. 3000 PSI COCrete 3 S'n D p O. 16 C.Y, 1500 Los O. $ DO o,s'o " d. i cncreta~ L~ 5D~ 0, '/.5'O. _ _ _ D[%C>, 26 C.Y. Subtotal Item 2 e9 ?S%J. °O Total Mount Bid E E d.o E '~7~_f_~°-~ E ov letion Time Cal, Da s ~$2_ - Reayrks ti 3 _ r, ;j 11A74ER 40RKSNINPAOVIHENTS CONSTRUCTION OF HIGH SERVICE PUMP STATION EXTENSION PROJECT NO. 85-WP-6 !10 M341 T A 8 U L A T I ON OF e l OS i Bids Opened 2100PN Nov. 6, 1994Frees# end Nichols, Inc. C.. s,s P~Ar~ Co e. • SMIyQ+~+J ~o. Consulting Engi Mrs D8 GAD d 1. Construction of H,S. Pu" Ste. $ ii f l ed t LLurp l ec S#A AS 3 oQa f _ oa s Olio ao s 37„ 3L1~" $ 2. For eddfd or deduct" exounts. e. 1600 PSI Concretg Unit Price 26 C.Y. S p, j0 S ~S~ /g9.Sy`"O f. ~~~5'D. S 20,OOt~ b. 3000 PSI Concrete 00 °O 3 °f' D. ODO. 0. `RfPV, 16 C.Y. g 1500 LOS ,.SO 7S~•°d V °O / ~O, ~,1~ 2961. d. i oncrete _ 26 C.Y. Qt_nG ~~7r d00, reo, /2SCD. Subtotal Sten+2 y, ddo.•~ 1, .0 D.° "-1 k4r-, " 1001 A+wunt Old f f X28 10940, Completion Tlae CAI. Days Rmarks r~ 0903L mac, N0. ING PROPOS ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BYI THEACITYP OF LDENTONTH TEXAS s AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. On the day of + 1984, at 700 o'clock P, MI in the City ouncil Cham errs-of ffi-`Runioipal building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persona the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below, On the day of , 1984, at 7.00 o'clock P.M, in the City Council Chambers oF-Th Flunicipa, Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wits All that certain 34.173 acre tract or parcel of land situated in the Eli Pickett Survey> Abstract Number 1018, Denton County, Texas; said tract being more particularly described as followai BEGINNING for the southeast corner of this traot at a point n the east right-of-way of. Farm-to-Market Road Number 2181, said (Teasley Lane) said right-of-way is the City of Denton, City limit line as shown on Annexation Ordinance 75-31, said point is north 89°53' east 90.00 feet from northwest aornev of a called 58,103 acre tract, recorded in Volume 769, Page 553, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 89°53} west part way with north line of said 58.103 acre tract, a distance of 1.389.88 feet to a point for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE north 00°07'44" west a distance of 1132,64 feet to the north right-of-way of Ryan Road, also the City of Denton, City limit line as shown on said Annexation Ordinance, for the northwest corner of this tract; THEN08 north 89°57' east with said north right-of-way and City limit line a distance of 1102.74 feet to said east right-of-way of Teasley Lane, for northeast corner of this tract; THENCE south 33°49'45" east with Said City limit line a distance of 58,64 feet to the beginning, of a curve to the right having a radius of 1477.30 feet (chord bearing south 17 37 45 east); THENCE southeasterly with said city limit line, and said curve a distance of 835.39 feet to and of curve; THENCE south 01°25'45" east with said east right-of-way a distance of 296.56 feet to Point of Beginning, SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published A-8/B. L. ARCHER/PAGE ONE 1 once in a newspaper hoving general circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor leas than, twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in aocordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), SECTION M. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1484. 3 RICHARb 0. STEWART~ MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY : C"1 A-8/B. L. ARCHER/PAGE TWO 0903E _ NOTICI Of MLIC ""RIM ON CONTEMPLATED AN KXATYON NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THATI The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation corporate said of the city following described territory to the limits Denton, to-witi limits y All that certain 34.173 acre tract or parcel of land situated in the Eli Pickett survey, Abstract Number 1028, Denton County, Texas; said tract being more particularly described as followst BECINNINO foal, the southeast corner of this tract at a point in the east right-of-way of Farm-to-Market Road Number 2181, said (Teasley Lane) said right-of-way is the City of, Denton, City limit line as shown on Annexation Ordinance 75-31, said point is north 89°53' east 90.00 feet from northeast corner of a called 58.103 acre tract, recorded in Volume 769) Page 553, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas; THENCE south 89°53' west part way with north line of said 58.103 acre tract, a distance of 1389.88 feet to a point for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE north 00°07'44" west a distance of 1132.64 feet to the north right-of-way of Ryan Road, also the City of Denton, City limit line as shown on said Annexation Ordinance) for the northwest corner of this tract; THENCE north 89°57' east with said north right-of-way and City limit line a distance of 110.2.74 feet to said east right-of-way of Teasley Lane, for northeast corner of this tract; THENCE south 33°49'451' east with said City limit line a distance of 58.64 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1477.30 feet (chord bearing south 17°37'45" east); THENCE southeasterly toith said City limit line, and said curve a distance of 835.39 feet to and of curve; THENCE south Ot°25145" east with said east right-of-way a distance of 296.56 feet to Point of Beginning. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 19840 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City Council Chambers o tie unicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said timo and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and bo heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1984 at 7:00 o'clock P. M, in the Cityy Council Chambers o tie unicipaf Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. RICHARD 3. STEWARTl MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE , CITY SECR9'rAAT A-8/B. ARCHER/PAGE SOLO A-8 REVISED ANNEXA'T'ION SCHEDULE November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items November 13, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *November 20, 1984 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing November 21, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle November 23, 1984 Publish notice November 26, 1984 Submit agenda item November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 04, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 051 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle December 07, 1984 Publish notice December 10, 1984 Submit agenda item December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 18, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item January 02, 1985 Subinit agenda bacK-up *January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City Council to institute annexation proceedings January 101. 1985 ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance February 111 1985 Submit agenda item February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council 0832g 0933E Do. NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE 'CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. On the day of , 1984 at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the CTTy -Council Chambers o -EFe Muniotpal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persona the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the day of 1984, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the `City Council tam era o e 6 nicl al Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: All that certain tract of land situated in the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract Number 514, Denton County, Texas, and being a part of the called 69.198 acre tract described in the deed from Lorene Sheppard Darrow, at al to John F. Brown recorded in Volume 1092, Page 748 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING for the northeast corner of the tract being described herein, at an iron rod set in the east ling of the said Brown Tract, south 01°23'18" east a distance of 555.7 feet from the northeast corner thereof and being in the west line of Masch Branch Road; THENCE south 01°23'18" east with the east line of the said Brown Tract and the west line of Masch Branch Road a distance of 406.26 feet to an iron rod set for the southeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE south 88°3624" west across the said Brown Tract passing at 542.84 feet to an iron rod set on the east bank of a dry branch and continuing along the same course, in all, a total distance of 569.89 feet to a point in the centerline of the said branch for the southwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE northerly up the said dry branch the following south meander calls: 1. north 51°07'11" west a distance of 144.35 feet; 2. north 20°57'02" east a distance of 132.88 feet; 3. north 87°48'54" east a distance of 106.69 feet; 4. north 56°16'35" east a distance of 178.40 faet; 5, north 12°54'08" west a distance of 95.07 feet; to a point for the northwest corner of the herein described tract; A-9/TRI-STEEL STRUCTURES, IN&,/PACE ONE THENCE north 88°36'24" east leaving the said dry branch, and passing at 34.9 feet, an iron rod set on the bank thereof and continuing along the same course in all, a total distance of eginning and enclosing 5,000 acres of 390.89 Feet to the place of beginning, land. SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in the City and in the above described territory not more than forty days nor less than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in aocordanoe with the Municipal Annexation Act (Article, 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of _ , 1984. III CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS II ATTEST: 7"r0, , CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: A-9/TRI-STREL STRUCTURES, INC./PAGE TWO 0933 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTEMPLATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY OXVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THATi The City of Denton, Texas, proposes to institute annexation proceedings to alter the boundary limits of said City to add the following described territory to the corporate limits of the City of Denton, to-wit; All that certain tract of land situated in the S. Huizar Survey, Abstract Number 514, Denton Count P Texas, and being a part of the called 69.198 acre tract described in the deed from Lorene Sheppard Darrow, at &I to John F. Brown recorded in Volume 1092, Page 748 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; the said tract being more particularly described as follows; BECINNINO for the northeast corner of the tract being described herein? at an iron rod set in the east line of the said Brown Tract, south fl1*23'18" east a distance of 55547 feet from the northeast corner thereof and being in the west line of Masch Branch Road; THENCE south 01°23'18" east with the east line of the said Brown Tract and the west line of Masch Branch Road a distance of 406.26 feet to an iron rod set for the southeast corner of the herein described tract; THENCE south 88°36'24" west across the said brown Tract pe,saing at 542,84: feet to an iron rod set on the east bank of a dry branch and continuing along the same course, in all a total distance of 569.89 feet to a point in the centerline old the said branch for the southwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE northerly up the said dry branch the following south meander calls; 1, north 51°07'11" west a distance of 144.35 feet; 2, north 20°57'02" east a distance of 132.88 feet; 3. north 87°48'54" east a distance of 106,69 feet; 4. north 56°16'35" east a distance of 178,40 feet; 5. north 12°54'08" west a distance of 95.07 feet; to a point for the northwest corner of the herein described tract; THENCE north 88°36'24" east leaving r".d said dry branch, and passing at 34.9 feet, an iron rod set on the bank thereof and continuing along the same course, in all, a total distance of 390.89 feet to the place of beginning and enclosing 5.000 acres of land. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 19843 at T:00 o'clock P. M. in the City L unQil Chambers o the unicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1984 at 7100 o'clock P. M, in the City ouncil Chambers o t e unicipal Building of the City of Denton, TexasI for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard. Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. MRID 0, 9TEWART, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: MRLOTTE ALL , CITY SECRETM ;t - `l A-9 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items November 13, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *November 20, 1984 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing November 21, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle November 23, 1984 Publish notice November 26, 1984 Submit agenda item November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 04, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 05, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle December U70 1984 Publish notice December 10$ 1984 Submit agenda item December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 18, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item January 02, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *January 08, 1985 Special. called meeting of City Council to institute ani,exation proceedings January 10, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance February 11, 1985 Submit agenda item February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council 09320 NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTq BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. On the day of , 1984 at 700 o'clock P. M. in the CTS Council am ere o e Municipal Building of the Citq of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the property described below. On the day of 1984' at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the"C''ty Council am era o e 6nici al Building of the City of Denton, Texas, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persona the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wit: Being a tract of land situated in the Berry Merchant Survey, Abstract No, 800, Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an inner corner of said Berry Merchant Survey, said point being the northwest corner of the A.H. Serren Survey, Abstract No. 1198, a point for corner; THENCE south 4°47' west along the dividing line between the Merchant Survey and the Serren Survey, 1272.31 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 4°05' west and continuing along the dividing line between said Merchant Survey and Serren Survey, 903.88 feet to the most southerly southeast corner of said Merchant Survey, same being the northeast corner of the B.B.B. b C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No. 190, a point for corner; THENCE north 85°39' west along the dividinc line between the Berry Merchant Survey and the B.B.g, S C.R.R. Co. Survey and passing the northwest corner of the B.B.B, & C.R.R. Co. Survey at approximately 1600 feet and continuing at north 85°39' west along the dividing line between the Merchant Survey and the C. Chacon Survkjy, Abstract No. 298 for a total distance of 1760.23 feet to a point for corner; THENCE north 1°08' east 3319.61 feet to a point in the center of a county road, a point for corner; THENCE south 86°41.' east 1561.11 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 3°07' west 1165.90 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 85°32' east 366.17 feet to the place of beginning and containing 131.761 acres of land. A-10/MYERS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/PAGE ONE A SECTION II. The Mayyor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and dir=sd to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspapper having general circulation in the City 'Aud in the above desoribed territory not more than forty days nor I"sss than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in see ordance with the Municipal Annexation Act (Articlle 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE ALL -'TTY' SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D~ MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: II A-10/MYERS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/PAGE TWO ? 09321, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTMELATED ANNEXATION NOTICE IS HEREBY OVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT: The City of Denton, Taxas, proposes to institute annexation following de scribed territory to the Limits oort said he Clttton, following described y Porate limits o y of Den Bain gg a tract of land situated in the Berry Merchant Survey, Abstract No. 800, Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an inner corner of said Berry Merchant Survey, said point being the northwest corner of the A.H, Serren Survey, Abstract No. 11984 a point for corner; THENCE south 4°47' west along the dividing line between the Merchant Survey and the Serren Survey, L272,31 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 4°05' west and continuing along the dividing line between said Merchant Survey and Serren Survey, 903.88 feet to the most southerly southeast corner of said Merchant Survey, same being the northeast corner of the 8.8,B, & C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract No, 190, a point for corner; THENCE north 85°39' west along the dividing line between the Berry Merchant Survey and the B.B,B. 6 C,R,R. Co, Survey and passing the northwest corner of the B.B,B. & C,R.R4 Co. Survey e,t approximately 1600 feet and continuing at north 85 39 west aloog the dividing line between the Merchant Survey and the C. Chaoon Survey, Abstract No. 298 for a total distance of 1760 23 feet to a point for corner; THENCE north 1°08' east 3319.61 Oeet to a point in the center of a county road, a point for corner; THENCE south 86°41' east 1561.11 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 3°07' west 1165.90 feet to a point for corner; THENCE south 85°32' east 366.17 feet to the place of beginning and containing 131.761 acres of land. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton) Texas, on the day of , 1984, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the Cityy Council Chambers o theMunicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texaa, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation, At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard, Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice, A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton; Texas, on the day of , 1984, at 1:00 o'clock P. M. in the City ouncil Chambers or_tRe lfunfcipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard, Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters Ferein mentioned, will take notice. RIC 6. STEWART~ MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHARLOTTE XLLENt GUY SECRETARY A-10 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items November 13, 1954 Submit agenda back-up *November 20, 1984 City council sets date, time and place for public hearing November 21, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle November 23, 1954 Publish notice November 2b, 1984 Submit agenda item November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 04, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 05, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle December 07, 1984 Publish notice December 10, 1984 Submit agenda item December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 18, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item January 0'L, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of G fty Council Lo institute annexation proceedings January 10, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance February 11, 1985 Submit agenda item February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up *February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council 09344 NO. AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DA'Z'E TIME AND PLACE ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION UIZINOQ ANDDIRCCTINQ THE BY THE E TO PUBLISH ~NOTICE OF SUCH A PUBLIC HEARING. THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I. On the day of , 1984 at 7100 o'clock P. M. in the Cam-Council iS era o 9 the Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Taxes, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the' property described below. On the day of 1994, at, 7100 o'clock P.M. in the`orty council ae ore o tile" ~luniciPal 1u~l,ding of the CiCy of p~nton, Texts, the City Council will hold a public hearing giving all interssted persona the right to appear and be hoard on the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of the following described property, to-wits All that certain 111.710 sore tract or parcel of lend situated in the 6,9.8. & C.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract Number 1411 and in the R. Nhitlook Survey, Abstract Number 1403, Denton County, Texas; said tract being part of a tract shown by deed to W. W. Marshall, recorded in Volume 416, Page 600, Deed Records Denton County, Taxes, and being more particularly described as foilowal BEGINNING for the northwest corner of this tract at a fence corner poet, said corner is the northwest corner of said Marshall tract; THENCE south 89°51'30" east a distance of 1961.87 feet a point for corner in Denton city limits line, said point is 600 feet southwesterly from the right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 350 for the northeast corner of this tract; THENCE south 03°39'47" east parallel to Interstate Highway 35 a distance of 2648.36 feet to a point for the southeast corner of "hie tract; THENCE south 89°58'42" west 1346.13 feet to an iron pin in the northeast right-of-way of A.T. & S.R. Railroad, for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE north 33°02' west with said right-of-way a distance of 94.68 feet to an iron pin Eor the begining of a curve to lthe right having a radius of 9091.23 font; THENCE northwesterly with said curve a distance of 254.27 feet (chord bearing north 33 17116" wait) to an iron pin fov the end of said curve; THENCE nouthwesterly with another curve to the ri;ht havin a radius of 6800.60 foot (chord bearing north 25°46 37" west e distance of 1324.91 feet to an iron pin, the end of curve) for a corner of this tract; THENCE north 00054139" west a distance of 1165.47 feet to point of beginning and containing 111.710 acres of land. A-12/HALTER DERODE-PAGE ONE 1 SECTION II. The Mayor of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such public hearing to be published once in a newspapper having general circulation in the City and in the above desoribed territory not more than forty days nor leas than twenty days prior to the date of such public hearing, all in accordance with the Nunicipal Annexation Act (Article 970a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), SECTION 111. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CIMLOTTF ALLEN, CITY SECKETKKY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LROAL F'ORMi JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: A-12/HALTER DERODE-PAGE TWO 0934G NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONTZH?LATED ANNEl g ON NOTICE IS HEREBY 01V,IN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THATi The City of the, Texas, proposes to institute annexation Mlowinngdeterritory torthe lt said the Itt $ describe Y corporate limits of Y of Denton, to-wits All that cbrtain 111.710 acre tract or parcel of land situated in the 8,348. 6 C,R.R. Co, Survey, Abstract Number 141, and in the R. Whitlock Survey, Abstract Number 1403, Denton County, Texas; said tract being part of a tract shown by deed to W. W. Marshall, recorded in Volume 416, Page 600, Deed Records Denton County, Texas, and being more particularly described as fol{owe: BEGINNING for the northwest corner of this tract at a fence corner post, said corner is the northwest corner of said Marshall tract; THENCE south 89°51'30" east a distance of 1961,87 feat a point for corner in Denton city limits line, said point is 600 feet south- westerly from the right-of-way line of interstate Highway 15, for the northeast corner of this tract; THENCE south 03°39'47" east parallel to Interstate Highway 35 a distance of 2648.36 feet to a point for the southeast corner of this tract; THENCE south 89°58'42" west 1346.13 feet to an iron pin in the northeast right-of-way of A.T. & S.R. Railroad, for the southwest corner of this tract; THENCE north 33°02' east with said right-of-way a distance of 94.68 feet to an iron pir, for the begining of a curve to the right having a radius of 9091.23 feet; THENCE northwsstq ly with said curve a distance of 254,27 feet (chord bearing north 33 17'16" west) to an iron pin for the end of said curve; THENCE noathwesterly with another curve to the right 1%aving a radius of 6800.60 feet (chord bearing north 25°46'37" west) a distance of 1324.91 feet to an iron pin, the end of curve, for a corner of this tract; THENCE north 00°54'39" west a distance of 1165.47 feet tc, point of beginning and containing 111.710 acres of land. A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1984, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City 'Council Chambers o the M nicipal Building of the City of Denton, Texas, for all persons interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard, Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice, A Public Hearing will be held by and before the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1984, at 7:00 o'clock P. M. in the City ouncil Chambers Ehe Municipal Building of the City of Denton, Texaa, for all persons Interested in the above proposed annexation. At said time and place all such persons shall have the right to appear and be heard, Of all said matters and things, all persons interested in the things and matters herein mentioned, will take notice. CIVY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CHAnOTTE ALLEN, CITY UECKETnY A-12 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE November 121 1984 Submit agenda items November 13, 1984 submit agelida back-up *November 20, 1984 City Council sets date, time and place for public hearing November 21, 1984 Notice to Uenton AecOrd Chronicle November 23, 1984 Publish notice November 26, 1984 submit agenda item November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 04, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 05, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle Uecember 07, 1984 Publish notice Uecember 10, 1984 Submit agenda item December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up *December 18, 1984 City Council holds public hearing December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item January 02, 1985 submit agenda oack-up *January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City Council to institute annexation proceedings January 10, 1985 ordinance to Denton Record Chronicle January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance February 11, 1985 submit agenda item February 12, 1985 submit agenda back-up *February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council CITY Or PENTON MEMORANDUM, DATE OF MEETINOt November 20, 19811 SUBJECT: Quitclaim of Center Street within 1.0,0.F Cemetery SUMMARY, There is an on going problem with traffic cutting; through cometery to avoid traffic light at Carroll and Cagle. This traffic also represents a, safety hazard to cemetery visitors and maintenance workers, Also we believe it advantapreous to close this entrance . to the cemetery since it would make it harder for vandals to enter and leave the cemetery, PXSCAL SUMMARYi No budgetary impact ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of ordinance as presented ALTERNATIVES: I. Approval of ordinance as presented 2, Disapproval of ordinance as presented 3. Table for future consideration STAFF RECOMMEDATION: Staff recommends approval believing; that this ordinance would negate a hazardous traffic situation. EXHTBXTS$ P & Z minutes D1 oa CITY of DBNron, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200 M 1s M 012 A N D U M TO: Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager FROM: Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation DATE ; November 6, 19811 SUBJECT: Quitclaim of Center Street We would like to have Center Street which runs through I.O,O.F cemetery qu.itol.aimed to out, down on traffic through the cemetery. It would also enable us to complete the fencing project along Eagle Drive which will greatly reduce the walking traffic through the cemetery and hopefully vandalism of headstones, We hope to have this item on the Council agenda for consideration on November 20, 19811, This has also been approved by DRC and the Planning and Zoning Cominission. C --ft% -46V Steve Brinkman PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT / 817.367.6146, j66.8270 N0, AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING AND VACATING OF THAT PORTION OF CENTER STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH EAGLE DRIVE NORTH THROUGH THE I,040 F, CEMETERY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH HIGHLAND STREET; PROVIDING FOR THE REVERSION OF THE FEE TO SAID PROPERTY FOR CEMETERY PURPOSES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after due investigation and consideration, has determined that the best interest and welfare of the public will be served by vacating and closing that portion of Center Street hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, that portion of Center Street hereinafter described is wholly adjoined by property owned and used by the City of Denton for cemetery purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I, That the following described portion of Center Street is hereby closed and permanently vacated as a public street and right-of-way of any kind or character forever; BEGINNING at the intersection of the north right-of-way line of Eagle Drive with the west right-of-way line Center Street; THENCE north along the west right-of-way of Center Street an approximate distance of 900 feet to a point for a corner, said point also lying in the south right-of-way line of Highland Street; THENCE east an approximate distance of 50 feet to a point for a corner, said point also being the east right-of-way line of Center Street, THENCE south along the east right-of-way line of Center Street an approximate distance of 900 feet to a point for a corner, said point also lying in the north right-of-way line of Eagle Drive; THENCE west an approximate distance of 50 feet to the place of beginning. SECTION II. That the ownership of the fee of that portion of Center Street closed and vacated herein shall revert to the adjacent property owner, the City of Denton, as provided by law. SECTION III. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this ordinance to be filed with the Office of Deed Records for the County of Denton, Texas, SECTION IV, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately after its passage and approval, i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984 RICWD 0, , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTI CHARLOTTE ALLENj CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM t JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CI'T'Y OF DENTONO TEXAS BY:,„~n~ y, MinuCes Planning and zoning commission July 21, 1982 Page 2 Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of Q-52, Seconded by Mr. Juren, Ms, Gilchrist asked about putting in speed bumps, Dis. cussion followed about desirability of speed bumps as a means of controlling speed and Mr. Brinkman agreed to monitor situation to see if some type of speed control would be necessay, Ms, Gilchrist then asked whether it would be more costly for city to maintain as a parking area rather than as a street and Mr. Edwards answered it would probably be about the same. Chairman asked if Commission wished to amend motion to add conditions of approval of quit claim. No amendment was suggested. Motion unanimously carried, (6-0) ~r B, ^53. Consider request of Parks and Recreation grtment for quitclaim of Center Street in IOOF Cemetery, it was moved by Mr. Claiborne, seconded by Ms. r9.lchirst and unanimously carried to remove item from table, Mr. Ellison presented request stating that Development Review Committee recommends approval, Steve Brinkman, Director of.Parks and Recreation, stated there is currently a problem with traffic cutting through cemetery to avoid the signal light at Carroll and Eagle, which is unsafe for citizens using cemetery and for maintenance people. They plan to barricade Centec at Eagle on a temporay basis and eventually will install a curb. There will still be three entrances and exits, including Carroll Boulevard as the main entrance. ` He said there is also a problem with vandalism] that police have been called but by the time they arrive on the scene vandals have left, as it is very easy to get in and out of cemetery, This inay create some hindrance, but that is what they are trying to do, Mr. Sidor moved to recommend approval of Q-=53. Seconded by Ms. Gilchrist and unannimously carried, (6-0) \t vi l 61* 14 111'# i 1 OAK CEMETERY DENTON, TEXAS . • 14 14 • r e Is 4 A 11 bIVIS14NS A•Y euxx BLOCKS NUMBERED w AS SHOWN ~ 1- SS, M, ~ ~ I 1 7 ~ p • 14 14 a !I >r 16 10 D 21 r 771 HIGHLAND STREET I I T I e 1 7 N N~ e n ~ M • d~ F 15 I E a 17 R is X !l i to 32 to tt 3b{ 33 4 35 , 40 41 42 34r.. > 1314131611 m rq It li 9• I Y i 7 Q 1E 18 H 14 S e 14 T 0- MAPLE a t ~ ° ae a in F "I „ E 3!f :e t4 in A 0 1 I I 1 '1- 14 e- J 1 0 13 u 21- i Eft ! 334 In F as In F M In E 33 331 7 8 Y 1 1 f 1 ! 1011 K L P V W Y 25 36 as In F as in E 33 os so[ 33 as iA u -1 1 11511 }{LI 1{I1 33 t e} 14 161 14 8}114 414 4 lie Zzi is EAGLE DRIVE N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR THE CREATION OF A LIBRARY BOARD TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF POLICIES GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE LIBRARY, REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH{ AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I. That Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances is hereby ame :ded by adding a now Article IV which shall read as followsi ARTICLE IV. LIBRARY Sec. 2.50. Library Board There is hereby created a Library Board which shall consist of seven (1) members to be appointed by the City Council. I The members shall be appointed for a term of two (2) years, provided three (3) members shall be appointed each odd numbered year and four (4) members each even-numbered year. Each member shall be a resident of the City of Denton. The Board shall elect its chairman from among its members, and shall serve for one (1) year or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. The Board shall serve without pay and shell adopt such rules as may be necessary for the regulation of its business and affairs. Sec. 2-51. Powers and Duties The Board shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Director of the Library and the City Council. The Board may make recommendations concerning operating policies and programs of the library, long range capital improvement planning and policy, and such other matters pertaining to the library and its operation as the Board dotermines necessary. The Board shall also have the responsibilities and duties conferred upon it by written policies expressly adopted, and as from time to time amended, by the City Council. Sec. 2-52. Operating Policies and Procedures The Library Director shall be responsible fo. the day to day operations of the library. The library shall be operated in accordance with the policies and procedures as recommended by the Board and approved by the City Council, a copy of which shall be kept on file with the City Secretary. See. 2.53. Library Cards (a) Residents, An adult applicant who submits reasonable documentation or information that the person perma- nently resides within the city limits is eligible for a library card free of charge upon making proper application. (b) Non -Residents. An applioant who is not a permanent resident of the city of Denton, but wtio is a resident of Denton County, ma upon proper applioatlon and pay- ment of an annual m% upon of eleven dollars ($11.00) be issued a library card which is valid for a period of one year. SECTION It. That the present members of the Library Board shall continue to serve as the officially appointed Library Board until the expiration of their respective terms, at which times now members of the Board shall be selected, appointed and serve in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION III. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any 'such conflict. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1984. IC D 0. STEWART, MAY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: C T ALLEN, CITY SECRMM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES The regular meeting of the Denton Library Board was held on Thursday, 27 September 1984 in the Board Room of the Denton Public Library at 7:30 p,m, PRESENT: A. Travelle (chairman), R, Hutton (acting secretary), S, Lockhart, K, McCallon, and J, Orr. ABSENT: K. Ferstl (ex), L, Gonzales (ex), M, Nichols (ex), R, Lookabatigh (ex), and R, Stephens (ex) GUEST: 1. S. Lockhart moved, K, McUllon seconded, Viet the minutes of the 26 July 1984 meeting be approved as corrected, ;lotion carried unanimously. 2. County Patron Fees: J. Orr reported that the City Council would take action related to the user fee for county residents (i,e,, non-Denton residents) at its next meeting. Eleven dollars ($11) was proposed as an appropriate user fee at the last Council meeting. 3. 1984,85 Approved Budget: The City Council approved a budget of $581,359 for the Library for fiscal year 1984/85, This budget includes 25 staff positions, an increase of two over the previous fiscal year. 4. Resolution of Appreciation of Margaret Nichols; R, Hutton moved, S. Lockhart seconded, that J, Orr send a memo to B. McKeen requesting M. Nichols be recognized by the City Council for her steadfast service as liaison representative for the County Commissioners and that a book be added to the Library's collection in her honor. Motion passed unanimously. 5, Old Business LA r reported that the revisions and corrections have been completed on ibrary's policy manual and that the text is at the City Manager's e, Members of the Policy Manual Revision Committee were: K. Ferstl., tton, S, Marino, and L. Miller (chair), ibrary changed to its winter schedule the first week in October, ry hours are, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday: 9:00 a,m, 00 p.m,; Tuesday and Thursday, 9:00 a,m, to 8:00 p.m.; Sunday onday, closed. ent citizen survey of city services revealed that Library services d the highest of all services provided by the city, 6, K, McCallon moved, S, Lockhart seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously, The motion was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. November 20, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITHM SUBJECT: Consider Revisions of Sectioli 25-24, Pro Rata Street Light Costs, SUMMARY. 5oction 25-24 specifies the costs to be paid by developers for street lighting to be installed on all new streets, 'These costs are revised semi-annually so that t':o City can recover the cost of installation, ordinance 25-24 needs to be revised to reflect the current costs as follows: Current Cost 5/84 Cost 4 Proposed Rate 10OW HPS Fiberglass Pole (owner conduit) $660 $670 10011 14PS Fiberglass Pole (City conduit) 810 825 25OW HPS Fiberglass pole (owner conduit) 1900 910 2SOW 11PS Fiberglass Pole (City conduit) $1,045 $1,065 HOW HPS Existing i+ood Polo 180 185 ,-SOW 11PS ExistinWood Pole 275 1275 1OOW HPS New Wood Pole $490 $510 250W HPS New Wood Polo $585 $600 FISCAL SUMMARY: It is pro)ected that, approximately 100 pro rata street lights will be installed during the next six months. The differential between pro rata charges and actual costs will be a capital cost to the electric division, AC'T'ION REQUIRED: City Council approval to revise Ordinance 25-24 to reflect the current pro rata costs. 3298U:8 RECOMM1iNUATIO : The Public Utilities Board, at their mooting of October 17, 1981, roe ommotide d to the Council Approval of the proposed revision of Ordinance 25-241, Respoctfully, R. E. Nelson Director of Utilities Exhibit- 1 Ordinance 11 Minutes PUB Meeting of 10117188 S298Ut9 1 N0, j AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING COST FOR STREET LIGHTING SERVICES PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.23 OF CHAPTER 25 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES; REPEALING ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HERESY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 25.23 of Chapter 25 of the Code of Ordinances of the cost to be charged for providing street lighting services are hereby established as followat SODIUM VAPOR LIGHTS SIZE POLE COST 100W UPS Fiberglass Pole Owner Conduit) $ 670 100W HPS Fiberglass Pole City Conduit) 825 250W HPS Fiberglass Pole Owner Conduit) 910 250W UPS Fiberglass Pole City conduit) 1,065 100W HPS Existing Wood Pole 185 250W HPS Existing Wood Pole 275 100W UPS New Wood Pole 510 250W HPS New Wood Pole 600 SECTION II, All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the pro- visions of this ordinanoe become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent, of any such conflict. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984, MWD 0.- AR , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST t MROTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM JOE D. MORRIS, AITING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BYI lA CUN$' , R' t 1 N - gElLOCATiON OF OVERHEAD UTILITY lS-OUWN N U H"$ 0 y Nelson advised that the Telephone Company has indicated a ' willingness to also place their lines underground around toe square, but desired a resolution from the Council that they could send to their headquarters, fne Board asked how mucn the Gelepnune and iATV would be paying to place their lines in the same trencn with the pity's and Nelson advised tnat, since the electric was going to have the trenches available anyway, tnat the laity was going to allow the Telephone Company and UATV to snare the trenches when possiole at nu cost, The Board requested tnat the Staff negotiate witn the Celephone Company and CATV and get each to pay one-tnird of the costs if possiole, Herring tnen made a motion to recommend to the Council toe resolution ~je approved and that the Staff negotiate with the 'Celephone Udmpgny and (;ATV for participation in a snare of the trenening costs, Second by Coomes. Five ayes, no nayes, motion carried, .0 CONSIDER REVISIONS OF SEL;TION 25-14 PRO RATA STREET LIGHT C1JS~S S. Nelson advised tnat this update of pro-rata street lights 0 is a routine revision eaen six (6) months to reflect the latest costs of street lights. Horring maue a motion to recommend to the Council the proposed pru rata street iignt changes, Second Uy Coomes, fj.ve ayes, no nayes, motion carried, 16. REuEiVE UPDAI'E ON: a) Raw water Pump Unit Controller & Valve u} uIP waterline & Sewerllne Projects. c) High Service Pump :nation Extensions Ham briefly reviewed the status of each of these projects- and advised that contract award on each would be Before the board in the near future, No further action was required on tnis item, ht1B MIt IfTTs 10/17/84 November 20, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AGHNDA ITEM Zr SUBJECT: Consider Engineering Services Contract with Freese $ Nichols Inc., for Design of a Ground Water Storage 'l'ank at the Water Treatment Plant, SUMMARY: In the slogan and Rasor Water Distribution Study of 1980, and in the Freese & Nichols Water Plant Study of 19840 it was noted that Denton is deficient in ground water storage according to state standards of 130 gallons per capita. Denton has 5 million gallo:ts Of gratind storage at the Plant and, for a population of 53,500, the requirement is 6,955,000 gallons. Denton pumped 20 MGD during the peak day this summer with hourly peak flows of 1,500,000 gallons or more, Considering the overhead storago of 4.3 million gallons, Denton's storage reserves would 'last approximately 6 hours during a peak day. Therefore, it is necessary to install a new 1,000,000 gallon ground storage tank at the Plant. This was included in the 1985 Capital Improvement Plan's first phase of Water Plant Rehabilitation Project #85-WP-2 ($1,780,000) and was included as one of the uses of the water bonds recently issued. The estimated cost of the tank is $400,000 with the engineering fee estimated at approximately $10,000, FISCAL SUMMARY: Engineering Cost $101000 Material and Construction Cost $400,000 TOTA14 $410,000 Source of Funds: Water Bond Funds i ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or disapprove of engineering contract with Freese and Nichols Inc., for subject ground storage tank design. 3312U:3 RIXONINIGNDATION The Public Utilities Board, at Choir meeting of October 29, 1984, recommended to the Council approval of the proposed ellginooring contract with Freese and Nichols for design of the ground storage tank with a foe not-to-excood $10,000, lies Oct£ul y R. U. Nelson Director of Utilities EXHIBIT I Engineering Contract with Freese Y, Nichols Il Minutes- PUB Mooting of 8/29/84 III ordinance I 3312U:4 i 0885L (let,) i , III NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF A GROUND STORAGE TANK FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAB` APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires to enter into a contract to procure professional services for the design of a ground storage tank including foundation and retaining wall, for the Water Treatment Plant; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36(f) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shell be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS; SECTION I. That the contract for engineering services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of Denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc., to provide for the design of a ground storage tank, including foundation and retaining wall, for the Water Treatment Plant is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the contract on behalf of the City. SECTION II. That the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the attached contract is hereby approved. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. c CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM JOE D, MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS c- - BY ~w~ j. t;N ENGINEERING SERVICES STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON THIS CONTRACT entered into this day of October 1984, by and between the City of Denton, Texas, her ne after called the Owner, acting b and through Richard 0. Stewart, Its Mayor, duly authorized to act, and Freese and Nichols, Inc, Consulting Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas, hereinafter called the Engineer, WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 1. Em to ment of En ineer: The Owner hereby employs the Engineer and the Eng neer agrees to per orm professional services. as herein set forth in connection with the construction of a 2 MG ground storage tank, foundation and retaining wall, hereinafter called the Project. 2. Character and Extent of Engineering Services: The Engineer shall render engineering services for he development and construction of the Project, which shall include the following: a. Desi ns Plans and Specifications: Make field surveys; advise with the Owner as to the number of borings, test pits, and other foundation explorations necessary to give a general indication as to the type and kind of subsurface conditions which can be expected at the site of the 2 MG ground storage tank and to observe the borings, test pits, and other fOUnda- tion explorations which the Owner deems necessary; prepare working drawings and specifications for the project, prepare forms of proposals; attend conferences and assist in the coordination of the work with other interested parties; and assist in the award of construction contracts. b. General Representation and Observation Durin Construction: The Ong neer shall furnish genera representation and ob- servation of the work during the construction phase as fol- lows: Review shop drawings pursuant to the General Conditions of the Construction Contract; make two visits per month to s+te by office staff; review such work of testing laboratories as may be required by the Owner; keep the Owner informed of the progress of the work; issue all instructions of the Owner to Contractor; prepare change orders as required and review the application for payment submitted by the Contractor. The Engineer shall use reasonable diligence to detect defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractor and disapprove or reject work as failing to conform to the Contract Documents. Engineer shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected 1. 1 I by Contractor or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the Contractor, Engineer shall not be re- sponsible for the acts or omissions of any person (except his own employees and agent) at the Project site or otherwise -010 orming any of the work of the Project. C. Resident Representation During Construction: If requested by the Owner, Resident Project Representative and assistants will be furnished who will act as directed by Engineer in order to provide more extensive representation at the Project site during the Construction Phase, The duties and responsibili- ties and the limitations on the authority of the Resident Project Representative and assistants, if requested by the Owner, will be set forth in Attachment A which is to be identified, attached to and made a part of this Agreement, Construction layout will be provided as a part of Resident Project Representation. Through more extensive on-site observations of the work in progress and field checks of materials and equipment by the Resident Project Representative and assistants, Engineer shall endeavor to provide further protection for Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work, but the furnishing of such Resident Project Representation will not make Engineer responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety precautions or programs or for Contractor's failure to perform the construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents, d. Subsurface Investigations and Laboratory Tests: The Engineer will provide the owner with advice, when requested, with respect to the making of all subsurface investigations, in- cluding borings, test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explorations; however, the making of such investigations and the interpretations of data and reports by special consultants are not a part of the services to be rendered by the Engineer, and the cost therefor shall be paid by the Owner, The Engineer shall monitor and review the work of testing laboratories and inspection bureaus required for the testing or inspection of materials, witnessed tests, factory testing, etc,, for the Project, but the cost or such laboratory tests or inspection shall be paid by the Owner, e. Topographic, Ri ht-of-Wa and Land Surveys: The Engineer shall make profile and topographic surveys only in connection with the location and design of all structures under Paragraph 2.a. 3. Compensation to Engineer: The Owner agrees to pay the Engi- neer for all professional services rendered under this contract in accordance with the following: a. Designs, Plans and Specifications and General Representation: For Designs, Plans and Specifications, and General Repre- 2. i sentation During Construction (Paragraphs 2,a. and 2,b,the Engineer shall be paid a lump sum of $10,000. For the pur- poses of preparing a statement, 85% of the fee shall be for deigns, plans and specifications and 15% of the basic fee '0411 be for eneral representation during construction, Eighty-five (85%1 percent of its fee shall be due and payable upon completion of designs and the submission of complete plans, specifications and contract documents to the Owner. The fee for general observation services (15% of the fee) shall become due and payable on the basis of the value of the work completed by the construction contractor, b, For Resident Representation and Inspection During Construction and Construction Laout: or the resident representation during construction and construction layout, if requested by the Owner (Paragraph 2,c,), the Engineer shall be paid based on the Schedule of Charges shown in Attachment B. Payments for Resident Project Representation and construction layout shall be due and payable upon submission of statements by the Engineer, Statements shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly, 4, Preliminary Estimates, When requested to do so, the Engineer will furnish est mats es of probable construction cost of the work, but he does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimates, 5. Revisions of Plans and Specifications: The Owner reserves the right to recut substantial revision of the plans and specifications after due approval by the Owner as Owner may deem necessary, but in such event the Owner shall pay to the Engineer just and equitable compen- sation for services rendered in making such revisions, 6. Inspection and Review of the Work: The Engineer will endeavor to protect the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractor, by inspection and observation of the work as it progresses, by interpretation of the plans, specifications and other contract docu- ments to and with the Contractor, by the disapproval of defective work and the issuance of stop-orders from the Owner with respect to defective procedures, where they are observed, and the Engineer will exercise due diligence to assist the Owner in requiring that the work be done in accordance with plans and specifications, but the Contractor will remain independent contractor with the Owner, and the Engineer does not guar- antee the performance of such construction contract. 7. Ownershio of Documents: Drawings and specifications as in- struments 6T-serv~ce are the property of the Engineer whether the work on which they are made be executed or not and the Engineer will retain in his files original drawings and specifications for the work. The Engineer will provide up to twenty-five sets of plans, specifications and contract documents. If additional sets are required, the Engineer shall be reimbursed based on the prevailing commercial rate. Upon completion of construction, the Engineer shall revise the working drawings in accordance with data furnished 'by Contractor to show the Project as constructed and the Owner shall be furnished two sets of prints made from the "Record" drawings. 3, 1 8, Teri ation; This Contract may be terminated at any time by the Owner, without penalty or liability except as may otherwise be specified herein provided the Engineer will be entitled to compensation for work perl.ormed prior to termination, 9. Arbitration; No arbitration arising out of, or relating to this Agreement ay~include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional party not a party to this Agreement. 10. Successors and Assignments; The Owner and the Engineer each binds himself, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns to the other party to this Agreement, and to the successors, executors, ad- ministrators, and assigns of such other party in respect of all cove- nants of this agreement. Except as above, neither the Owner nor the Engineer shall assign, sublet or transfer his interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other, This Contract is executed in two counterparts, IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, they have executed this Agreement, the day and year first above written, ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Owner ~ Charlotte Allen, My Secretary Y c ah rd 0. Stewart, Mayor City of Denton, Texas City of Denton, Texas ATTEST; FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. Engineer 'IV By: Robert Nichols Vice President 101~OMk oil, r 1 cot 4. ATTACHMENT A Duties, Responsibili/ties and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Repr/osentati've A, Ctreral. Resident Project Representative Is ENOINHEA's Agent, will act as directed by and under the supervlalort of EN01- NEER, and will confer with ENGINEER regarding his actions, Resident Project Representative's dealings in matters pertaining to the on-she Work shall in general be only with ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR, and dealings with subcorNrooors shall only be through or with the full knowledge of CONTRACTOR. Written communication with OWNER will be only through or as directed by ENGINEER, a, wo" wsd IlanslbiYtlM, Resident Project Representative will: 1. Sch*duks,- Review the progress scheduk, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions and schedule of valuei prepared by CONTRACTOR and consult with ENGINEER concerning their acceptability, 2. Con/erence.t~ Attend preconstruction conferences, Arrange a schedule of progress meetings and other job conferences as required In consultation with ENGINEER and notify those expected to attend in advance, Attend meetings, and mahttain and circulate copies of minutes thereof. 3. Valtonr a, Serve as ENGINEER's liaison with CONTRACTOR, working principally through CONTRACTOR's superinien• dent and asslst him in understanding the Intent of the Contract Documents, Assist ENOINEERin serving as OWNER's liaison with CONTRACTOR when CONTRACTOR's operations affect OWNER's on-she operations. b. As requested by ENGINEER, assist In obtaining from OWNER additional details or information, when required at the job site for proper execution of the Work. I, Shop Drawings and Samples; a. Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples, receive samples which are furnished at the site by CONTRACTOR, end notify ENGINEER of their avallabil!ly for examination. b. Advise ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR or its superintendent Immediately of the commencement of any Work requlring it Shop Drawing or sample submission if the submission has not been approved by ENGINEER, S Review of Work, Rejection of Defecrls,e Work, Imix,(rfuna and Tests, a. Conduct on-site observations of the Work In progress to assist ENGINEER In determining If tht Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and that completed Work will conform to the Contract Documents, b. Report to ENGINEER whenever he believes that any Work Is unsatisfactory, faulty or defective or dots not conform to the Contract Documents, or does not meet the requirements of any Inspections, tests or approval required to be made or has been damaged prior to final payment; and adyim ENGINEER when he believes Work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for observation, or requires special testing. Inspection or Approval. c, Verify that tests, equipment and systems startups and operating and maintenance Instructions are conducted as required by the Contract Documents and in presence of the required personnel,,arW hat CONTRACTOR maintains adequate records thereof; observe, record and report to ENO [NEER appropriate details relative to the test procedures and startups, d. Accompany visiting Inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these Inspections and report to EN0INPER, ®19/9 by National Society of Professional Ensineers 2029 k St„ N, W , Washington, D.C, 20006 NSPF)ACCC/ASCE Pubtkallon No, 1910•I•A i979 EdI1Wn i 6. lnterpreiarloil of Conlrilct Documews: Transmit to CONTRACTOR ENOINEER's ciarlficallons and Interpretations of the Contract Documents, t 7. ModlJlrarions: Consider and evaluate CONTRACTOR's suggestions for modifications in Drawings or Specifications and report them with recommendations to ENGINEER. 8. Records., a, Maintain at the job site orderly nits for correspondence, reports of job conferences, Shop Drawings and samples submissions, reproductlons of original Contract Documents Including all addenda change orders, field orders, addi• tional Drawlegs issued subsequent to the executlo,l of the Contract, HNOINEERIs clarifications and Interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and other Project related documents, b. Keep a diary or log book, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of exltas or deductions, list of vithing officials and representollvts of manufacturers, fabricolors, suppliers and distributors, dally activities, decisions, observatlons in general and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures Send ct•ries to ENGINEER. c, Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all CONTRACTORS, subcontractors and major suppliers of materials and aquipment, 9. Repo►ri: a, Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports as required ofprogmssoftheWork andCONTRACTOR'scompliance wkhthe approved progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing submissions b, Consult with ENGINEER in advance of scheduled major tests, inspections or start of Important phases of the work, c, Report Immediately to ENGINEER upon the occurrence of any accident, 10, Paymem Requivilons: Review applications for payment with CONTRACTOR for compliance with the established procedure for lhteir submission and forward them with racommendattons to ENGINEER, noting particularly their relation to the schedule of values, Work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not incor• porated In the Work, It. Cerrtficares, MalHtenanCe and Operatlon Manuals: During tht course of the Work, verify that certifkates, maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and furnished by CONTRACTOR are applicable to the Items actually installedi and deliver this material to ENGINEER for his review and forwarding to OWNER prior to final acceptance of the Work, 12, Completion: a, Before ENGINEER Issues a Certificate of Substantial Compittlon, submit to CONTRACTOR a list of observed items requiring completion or correction, b. Conduct final inspection in the company of ENGINEER. OWNER and CONTRACTOR and prepare a final list of items to be compkled or corrected, c. Verify that ail Items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to ENGINEER concerning acceptance, C. LiollMilowu'Aw"101y, Except upon written instructions of ENGINEER, Resident Project Representatiye; 1. Shall not authorize any deviation from the Contract Documents or approve any substitute materials or equipment, 2. Shall not exceed limitations on ENOINEER's authority as set forth in the Contract Documents, J. Shall not undcrtaktany oftheresponsibliitiesofCONTRACTOR,subconlractorsorCONTRACTOR'ssuperintendent. or expedite'tht Work. 4. Shall not advise on or issue directions relative to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques. sequences or procedures of construction unless such is specifically called for in the Contract Documents. S, Shall not advise on or issue directlons as to softly precautions and programs in connection with the Work. 6. Shall mat authorize OWNER to occupy the Project in whole or in part. 1. Shall not paHkIpatle In specialized fief or laboratory tests. NOW ►i BnWeete' lath Canna Doc wnente Co nnw,ee ' A,►►dwd)s,Mly by, ►rn,4u,enM Entineen M Mvsle Res, ke,spnc tice 4iv1 &ion d ON Nol"W%M* lyd Rn IIw &JFn„M:-e. AOWACM ConwMwy Fno n"nCowwd: Aa - ksnsetr,•, d C I W low'"tn ATTACHME14T 8 FREESE AND NICHO_LS, INC. Schedule of Charges Special Services Staff Members Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2,2 Salary Cost is defined as the cost of salaries of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers, surveymen, clerks, laborers, etc., for time directly chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions, un- employment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, bonuses, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay applicable thereto. (Salary Cost is equal to 1.39 times salary pay- ments. This factor is adjusted annually,) Other Direct Expense Actual Cost Times Multiplier of 1,0 Other direct expenses shill include printing and rdproduction expense, communisation expense, travel, transportation and subsistence away from Fort worth and other miscellaneous expense directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and other work required to be done by independent persons or agents other than staff mdmbers, MINUTES PUBLICUTILI'rIES BOARD MBETINO October 29, 1984 7;00 AM Ramada Inn Denton, Tx Members Present: Laney, Herring, Coomes, Boyd, Thompson Chris Hartung, R,E. Nelson Staff Present: E. B. Tullos, David Ham, Charles Cryan Others: Congressman Ray Roberts John Ho, Espey-Huston Associates, Engineers Chairman Laney brought the meeting to order at 7:20 AM, 1, CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING OF OCTOBER 17 19 4: Mr. Coomes made a motion to approve the Minutes as wr tten, Second by Herring, Five ayes, no nayes, motion carried, 2. CONSIDER THE ENGINSERING SERVICES CONTRACT WI H FREESE AND HICHOLS , THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT: Nelson in ormed theBoard Chat tHe° pity is a n n, ground level water storage capacity according to state standards, as reflected In both the Hogan and Rasor Distribution Study of 1980 and the Freese and Nichols Distribution Study of 1984, The project has been included in the 198S Capital Improvement plan for bonA funds from the recently issued revenue bond. The. Board asked questions clarifying waere the money would come from and whether the project is included in the current Capital Improvements Plan, Following this discussion, Mr, Coomes made a motion to recommend signing the contract, Second by Thompson. Five ayes, no nayes, motion carried, 31 CONSIDER BID 09344- POWER TRANSFORMER AND SUBSTATION s : Nelson an ull'os expla ne t at t e uTs"ta"f'i`on will be needed before next summer's peak load due to the growth in the southeastern portion of the City of Denton, Mr, Tullos explained that they bid both for the components and for a completed project, "turn key'", to determine whether it is feasible to have the work done other than with City staff. The determination at this time is tnat the City can still build its own stations somewhat cheaper than those bidding on the contract, The project is a part of the 1985 Capital Improvements Plan and will be ppaid for out of bond funds. The staff recommendation was or the Board to recommend to the Council acceptance of ASIiA Electric for the transformation equipment and Clark Substation for the substation equipment, additional materials and supplies necessary for the new substation as the lowest qualified bid. 3311U NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, FOR THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FEE. FOR THE UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires to continue receiving professional maintenance servtoes for its u~.ality billing system; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36(f) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000.00; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Denton City Charter requires that every act of the City Council providing for the expenditure of funds or the contracting for indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, I THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the expenditure of $14,400.00 for annual maintenance of the Customer Information System and $4,200.00 for annual maintenance of the Meter Records System, a total sum of $18,60U.00 as specified in the invoice attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference and pursuant to the existing contract with TRES Systems, Inc., is hereby approved. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED TH18 THE day of 1984. C STEQUY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: MiMLOTTE ALLEN) CITY SECRETAR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: J08 D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DEN,T~fON, TEXAS By: Q C1 TRES SYSTCMS INC; 1617$ AdOlw A0W D*44,14"s 1b246 214/2/6!111 i INVOICE NuM6FR 080015 September 10, 1984 CITY OF DENTON 324-A East McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Attention: Oary Collins invoice for the TRES Customer information System Maintenance fee per Primary Agreement No, 758. CONTRACT PERIOD October 1, 1984 thru September 30, 1985 Customer information System S14,400.00 Meter Records System 41200,00 TOTAL INVOICE $18,600,00 (.~1+'rsH Gl.~a+-saved Ross tarrons controller Vm Please remit to: TRF.S Systems, Inc, P,o. Box 84016 Dallas, 'Texas 752A4 V614J'l l % it 110L.1 11 VI 1111 CLIENT NAME PA Ni an No. f1t1) JO HO.Ilny Mr/no Ito OrJd Dal1 CTenl PO No City of Denton 758 014 /12/84 g1Y01CINO ADDRESS 111 ddllunl llom Agr"MOIl SNIP TOA ORE5s (110d1e1enl DOm&u)~"` 324-A East McKinney CITY PATE 21P CITY STATE hP Denton lvx 76201 BOER INK SITE A RES$IIrKlude noorc., DmMinp, FXmj Immorder AWI On Order Cnl1g/OWN C l l Keny/d WAIvoll 1'1 bc*n dM/t/daH Urwo CITY S1AIE 21P I IMarnlH4ma OAIJinNnlnoe nInr ldnq Addry3 CLIENT TR698y1MInhMK. - Cit of Denton Ey IAUlhaged $Ipralunl r yl ulhalrld SpMN Ham/ A N E m r Nelson G. Hamrick NTt ~ l1lE s Sr. Vice President DAITF_ CA19 } September 12 1984 igSt OIy Numt>.r DESCRIPTION YellionA `.i Retenl 1 Customer Information System (CIS) Maintenance (10-1-84 to 9-30-85) $14,400 Meter Reoords SystsAm Maintenance (10-1-84 to 9-30-84) 41200 Specllled Op/rlhnq Equipm/nl Derhery Medea ALL CMAROES EXCI VICE TOTAL APPLICABLE SAXES $1 e , 6 0 VN wdN Prlm/ry AglNml nl, LIHANd A1111rN1a Addlndum or Mlmtlnlnce AdJlndom AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY VENDOR i S N ~Pg o tAc Cit.Y C'} I)I'1,1-n Ad Cy to, rd, r y 11., ~'f I ~ at 1:00 V,M, iat. the R.. il:a lass. ?f hi,1,,~l i'r~;efhtt (:i,r~ald C,1vowol,l Pale WHY Ronald McDodc Ray Pittman C' h l'roAlpt i Cary Collins Phyllis Morris of thv City Staff The t^"P''ng was called to order by Gerald Cardwell and h_he minutes f Ju,; 14, 1964 meeting were considered, There being no c.rrvC.t, .i ns nceded the minuics werc Ftl'pi'ovpd unautm usly its n:'11'r. i v, X ry Collins prosynt.ed to the scard the I' intorknC (t lros Corporation for the Tres rorporation to pi vl'E: V- rvices to the 1:':V c Dorton. an the t t i ily 41110; F: I is CIS" _ne to Pat! !(,,YS e' :tcm. Gary CK .11 . d9e t'orit roc is wore , u- t i1. is 114 Cif a "1 r. " .I 11 s ahd L1'at tthe ,'SL 01 01 tVe Not or L dS l! ! . {iYcl?ilr1WO a8FE'uzont had YOU il],;lllit K in 10 O .E:rn', :If i rk e, Cary Collins stated Gat as in the past the Wt ee C vv : ,,q' ngi:_awE.nts woye anticipated vhen thV original . wofiw.re l,fiCh'nge purchase decisinns wore bade, Mr, Pon ik' adc. made a motion to recommend that the City of Donlon's counC_il approve this mattltr:A"ce agreement. Mr, Ray Pittman seconded the motion and the Motion was passed unanimousl'~D 3, Gary Collins preEented the board with findings of the trips to the Cities of Bryan, Texas; E1 Paso, Texas and San Angelo, Texas to view the respective Municipal Court systcam, Cary Collins explained that a second trip to El Pas,, was necessary since on the first visit: the system was being operated in a test mode in the Data Pronussig'Department and at that time serious procedural problems hied not been resolved, In earls' October n second site visit to 0 ?,vc was made and the system was Wowed in a opieratirnal wo& in tills r:oorL clerks environment, Cary Collins explained that the ion-lution of problems in the 5 mrnths from the first visit u re very apparent and the E1 Paso system provided the maximum number of functional options of all three systems. Cary Collins discussed with the Board the major differences butwoe.n We thioo systems and the features that attracted us to the City of El lrlasso'6 system. -s >no i.l V'v 1 i3 Not t I.. "id 41 e re "ni'. As NO ut El no's :VO IP01 Court sy"Iym, ':ply C-10j'= Wt t: :'4i eri Wt Or: took fl+t CC . as t; i't i1 V. to p! UFrJI i. Ki- t. i lir ;r:5 l Od thoi.r r. , n W al Wn to the City Ci`t UNI at the .1: NO it My Collin; pC:,.vel' ed to :hl' Word t%v W nter 'id K ..7,..'rv Nan for 04 reta Pry lag ;Art cnl It a i`t lo d is F'"n OI,'Pod tip ',".,.7'l\' with N r,^ _5t .!oil'. O J•-Ofl.'ois :1 C1 would he iM'1.aYd-'Ii f_•1' 1.P i. r I+.'A' rte. VA It 70,., iA'i it LIdS •;plained Ont. this p4n vould he WL !jWLArWd in IQ K f_7t;.lley 1 ant Division' a rat1. 'It1' iW r' , v, or V'1 o. W Dale Maddry '!•St UyL l t hAt the plan gill ' i t I ` P City of Fi an to not as a bnc4up gVe and th"C bon qil out o on , ~ i. '.P Site is used the corninicni loss ;end pooplu ovey, ur i Y, Y1. ..te greatly iucrutased, Mr. Dale Maddry ;ugCostcd the City of Waton Attempt to seek <a backup site in Denton for uwvTgency pro, , : sing on a limited basis. Gary Collins responded he would AeLh Vit.'n the other IBM computer sites in Demon to see it some Lind of agreement for emergency processing would he feasible. rhere being, no fort hor huv:ucss the illy v ing was adjC vned. 0816L (441x) f NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND SERVICES PROGRAM FOR ACING NEEDS (SPAN)' AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE V6ENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE;; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE0ATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City to provide public funds to Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN), in consideration of the valuable public services to be furnished by Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN to the City of Denton in accordance +oith the "Funding Agreement' attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve n11 expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves the "Funding Agreement" attached hereto, between the City of Denton and Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN), and authorizes the Mayor to execute said agreement. SECTION 11. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the Agreement. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. R1CW6 0. AM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY, 224E FUNDING AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY 01' DENTON § This Agreement is hereby entered into by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a Home Rule Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as City) and Services Program for Aging Needs (heroin- after referred to as SPAN). In order to provide transportation services to a limited number of handicapped persons on a trial basis, the parties hereto agree as £ollowsl SPAN shall provide transportation services within the city linsita to those handicapped persons under sixty (60) years of age selected by the City's Denton Human Resources Committee. Applies- tions to receive such transportation services shall be submitted by the applicants to the City on forme approved by the City. The applicants selected to receive the transportation services shall. be determined by the City's Denton Human Resources Committee on Transportation in consultation with the Director of SPAN. Appli- cants in need of transportation for employment purposes shall be given priority consideration over applicants needing transportation for medical appointments, banking, shopping or social purposes, 2. SPAN may contract with other persons or companies to provide the services specified herein during times when SPAN does not operate. Transportation services provided by such subcontracts shall be in accordance with the terms and cunditioas of this agreement, 3. SPAN shall furnish the transportation services in accordance with working hours and holidays established by the SPAN Bisrd of Directors. 4. Applicants for SPAN transportation services shall provide a statement by a physician concorning the applicant's handicap. Such statement shall be a factor in considering the applic-int'a need for transportation service. I SERVICES PROGRAM FOR AOING NEEDS (HANDIHOP)-PAGE 1 1 5. SPAN shall undokrnAa to develop a plan whaveby passqllgors of the transportation services will pay One Dollar ($1.0U) for every one-way trip provided to that person. 6. All SPAN records of the services provided for herein shall be open to the City at all reasonnble times for inspectlon kind audit. 7. The City shall pay to SPAN Five Dollars ($5.00) for every one-way trir, furnished to a passengor and Four Dollars ($4.00) for every one-way trip furnished by any subcontractor in accordance with the terms of this agreement. The City shall, at the beginn- ing date of this agreement and thereafter at Intervals of three months (quarterly) pay to SPAN Four Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Dollars ($4,950.00) for the services provided herein. SPAN shall submit monthly statements to the City RiloWing the services pro- vided pursuant to this Agreement. The City shall not in any case, • pay more than than Nineteen Thousand Eight Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($19,800.00) to SPAN for furnishing the services provided for herein. Within thirty days of the termination of this Agreement, SPAN shall return any funds previously paid to SPAN which were not used to provide transportation services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 8. At the end of six (6) months of to,, '%8reement SPAN shall make a 'report to the Human Resources Committee concerning the services so far provided pursuant to this Agreement and the projected services zo be provided during the remainder of the Agreement. Based upon such report, the Human Resources Committee may determine if additional funding is needed to provide continued transportation services through the remainder of the Agreement term. If the Committee determines that additional funding is needed, it shall make its recommendations to the City Council. 9. Commencing with and during the term of this agreement, SPAN, shall at its own exponse, procure and maintain in full force SERVICES PROGRAM FOR AGING NEEDS (HANDIHOP)-PACE 2 and effect insurance written by an insurance company authorized to do business in this State. Such insurance shall insure the City against all liability for loss, injury, damage or claims caused by or arising out of, or in connection with the services provided for herein, including injurirs to or deaths of paasengera or third persons and damage to or destruction of property. Without in any way ';inviting the generality of the above, SPAN shall keep and maintaic the following types of insurance In minimum amounts as follows; $100,000 bodily injury per person; $300, MO bodily injury per occurrence; $25,000 property damage. 10. This agreement shall be effective on October 1, 1984 and shall terminate on September 30, 1985. EXECUTED this the day of , 1984, ctry or DENTON, TEXAS SERVICES PROGRAM POR AGING NEEDS (RANDIHOP) MAYOR 6iItT'CTOR ATTEST; ATTEST: CITY SECRETARF SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY BY: `ICy `c T` µ SERVICES PROGRAM FOR AGING NEEDS (11ANDIHOP)-PAGE 3 HRC Minutes May 10, 1994 Page Two justified. Fannie Belle oaupp asked Elizabeth Evans to call Nancy Brown, Director of Fred Moore Child Care, and ask her about the increase and what the $6,000 would be used for, Ms. Evans left the room. The committee deci- ded to table action on the request until Ms. Evans returned. rh ndi-Hop was discussed. The committee said that the quested amount ($19,800) was merely a projection for w many trips would need to be reimbursed in the next ar. The committ ee agreed that the Handi-Hop program is commitment to provide a service and the amount of mon_. is not really a set amount. Karen Connor moved that ndi-Hop be funded for $19,800, seconded by Norrie wdon, Motion carried 9 - 0, enton Cit -County Day Nuraery was discussed. The agency requested 110,000 - a $3,000 increase from last year, The committee again rained the question of whether this increase was justified. Trudy Foster explained that she felt the increase was justified because the day care center was not getting as much money from the government for food and it also did not want to raise its fees, There was some discussion about the number of interna- tional students that had children at the nursery and also the fact that the nursery was not strictly for low income families. Trudy Foster moved that the agency be funded for $10,000, seconded by ncn Pickens. Motion carried 9 - 0. At this time Elizabeth Evans returned and relayed that Nancy Brown had explained the justification for request- ing an increase as follows: (1) the federal and state governments were cutting back on their funding approxi- mately 7 percent (2) inflation (3) the $6,000 would mainly be used for salary increases. The committee continued discussion of the Fred Moore Child Care request and the fact that this was the only day care facility that serves only low income working fa- milies was stressed. Irene price moved that the agency be funded at $18,000, seconded by Betty Kreps. Motion carried 9 - 0. RSVP was discussed. The agency requested $6,000, a $500 increase from last year. The committee felt that RSVP performed a very worthwhile service. Ethelyn Davis moved to fund at $6,000, Bill Crouch seconded. Motion carried 9 - 0. 4C me NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND DENTON CITY-COUNTY DAY NURSERY; AUTHORIGING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS) the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City to provide public funds to Denton City-County Day Nursery, in consideration of tho valuable public services to be furnished by Denton City-County Day Nursery to the City of Denton in accordance with the "Funding Agreement" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Cade of Ordinances egoirea that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $5,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HERESY ORDAINSi SECTION 1. That tie Citq Council hereby approves the "Funding Agreement" attached hereto, between the City of Denton and Denton City-County Day Nursery, and authorizes the Mayor to execute said agreement. SECTION 11. That tie My Council authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the Agreement. SECTION III. iat t, s ordinance shall become affective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1964. C E , CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: C! LO E A L , CITY SSC 1E ARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEM FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS „tiwi V BY; _4" 2321, FUNDING AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § KNOW ALL, MEN BY THESE PRESENTSi COUNTY OF DENTON § This Agreement to hereby entered into by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a Home Rulu Municipal Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as City) and the Denton City-County Day Nursery (hereinafter referred to as Agency); WHEREAS, the City's Human Resources Committee (HRC) has reviewed the services of the Agency and has determined that the Agency performs an important human service for the residents of Denton without regard to race, religion, color, age or national origin, and therefore HRC recommends funding the Agency; and WHEREAS, the City ties determined that the Agency morits assistance and has provided for Ten Thousand and Vo/100 Dollars ($100000.00) in its budget; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree a9 follows; I. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Agency shell in a satisfactory and proper manner perform the following taskst A. The Agency's purpose is to provide low cost day care to low income families where both parents work. H. To provide two nutritional meals (breakfast and lunch) for the children. II. TIME PERFORMANCE The services funded by the City shall be undertaker by the Agency within the following time frame; October 1, 1984 through September 30, 1985. M. USE OF FUNDS City funds made available under this Agreement shall be utilized by the Agency to perform the following; A. The funds ,aid to Agency are to be used to provide the scope of services provided for herein. FUNDING AGREEMENT-DENTON CITY-COUNTY DAY NURSLRY-PAGE ONE a Iv, METHOD OF PAYMENT The City agrees to make payoont to the Agency upon submis- sion of approved requisitions in one (1) lump sum paywFnt. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event under the terms of this contract will the total compensation to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Ten Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($10,000,00) for all of the services rendered. V. EVALUATION The Agency agrees to participate in an implementation and maintenance eysteoc whereby the services can be continuously monitored. T~.e Agency agrees to make available its financial records for re,.i(w 1; the City at the City's discretion. In addition, the Age.. agrees to provide the City the following data and/or report,„ A. All external or internal audits. B. All external or internal evaluation reports. C. Quarterly performance reports submitted in January, April, July and September, to include the following criteriai 1. Number of children served each month. 2. Income level of families participating in program. D. Quarterly financial statements submitted in January, April, July, and September to include expenses and income. VI. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION The City may suspend or terminate this Agreement and payments to the Agency, in whole or part, for cause. Cause shall include but not be limited to the following; A. Agency's improper, misuse, or inept use of funds. B. Agency's failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement. C. Agency's submission of data and/or reports that are incorrect or incomplete in any material respect, or FUNDING AGREEMENT-DENTON CITY-COUNTY DAY NURSERY-PAGE TWO D. If for any reason the carrying out of this agreement is rendered impossible or infeasible In case of suspension, the City shall advise the Agency, in writing, as to conditions precedent to the resumption of funding and specify a reasc-onable data for compliance. In case of termination, the' Agency will remit to the city any unexpended City funds. Acceptance of these funds shall not constitute a waiver of any claim the City may otherwise have arising out of this Agreement, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties do hereby affix their signa- tures and enter into this Funding Agreement as of the day of , 1984. CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS DENTON CITY-COUNTY DAY NURSERY UTTVRM ATTEST: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEOAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY FUNDING AGREEMENT -DENTON CITY-COUNTY DAY NURSERY-PAGE THREE HRC Minutes MAY 10, 1994 Page Two Justified, Fainnie Belle aaupp asked Elizabeth Evans to call Nancy grown, Director of Fred Moore Child Care, and ask her about the increase and what the $6,000 would be used for. Me. Evans left the room, The committee deci- ded to table action on the request until Me, Evans returned. % Handi-Hop was discussed, The committee said that the requested amount ($19,800) was merely a projection for how many trips would need to be reimbursed in the next year, The committee agroed that the Handi-Hop grogram is a commitment to provide a service and the amount of mon- ey is not really a set amount, Karen Connor moved that Handi-Hop be funded for $19,800, seconded by Norrie Rawdon. Motion carried 9 - 0, , rDenton Cit -County bay Nurserwas discussed. The agency uested $10, Oq0 - a $3,000 increase from last year. committee again raised the question of whether this rease was justified. Trudy Foster explained that she t the increase was justi f irtd because the day care ter was not getting as much money from the government for food and it also did not want to raise its fees, There was some discussion about the. number of interna- tional students that had children at the nursery and also the fact that the nursery was not strictly for low income families. Trudy Poster moved that the agency be funded for $10,000, seconded by bon Pickens. Motion carried 9 - 0, At this time Elizabeth Evans returned and relayed that Nancy Drown had explained the justification for request- ing an irsorease as followsr (1) the federal and state governments were cutting back on their funding approxi- mately 7 percent (2) inflation (3) the 16,000 would mainly be used for salary increases, The committee continued discussion of the Fred Moure Child Care request and the fact that this was the only day care facility that serves only low income working fa- milies was stressed. Irene Price moved that the agency be funded at $18, 000, seconded by Betty Kreps. Motion carried 9 - 0, RSVP was discussed, The agency requested $6, 000, a t500 increase from last year. The committee felt that RSVP performed a very worthwhile service, Ethelyn Davis moved to fund at $6,000, Bill Crouch seconded. Motion carried 9 - 0, it NOVEMBER 20, 1,984 'c✓ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITFAM SUMMARY= Tile attached invoice from Municipal Electric Job Traininy has been submitted by the Utility Electric Distribution and Metering/Substation Divisions for payment. Participation in this training program allows our employees to receive on-the-job safety training, etc., for the Electric Distribution crews and the Metering/Substation crews, This has proven to encourage sai•ety consciousness among the crews. FISCAL SUMMARYi Aoct, #610-008-0252-8522-E926 $4,329.68 ACTION REQUIRW)i Approval or disapproval by City Council of ordinance allowing payment of this invoice. STAFF' RECOMMHNUATION: 't'he Staff recommends this ordinance be approved. Respectfully, John r . ~~lc~rane llirector of Finance EXHIBIT I Check Requisition II Invoice Ili Ordinance 09361, NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF 'UNDS BY THE CITY OF DENTON FOR PARTICIPATION IN A MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC J08 TRAINING PROGRAM AND APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF iUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the citizena of the City to provide public funds for on-the-job safety training of all employees of the Utility Electric Distribution and Metering/Substation Divisions ; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton, Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shall be by ordinance) NOW, THEREFORE, , THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby approves the expenditure of funds to Municipal Electric Job Training for all employees of the Utility Electric Distribution and Metering/Substation Divisions for on-the- job safety training, SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of $4,329.68 as specified in the attached invoice. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1984. RICTWD 0, CITY OF DENTON3 TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 8Y: ~ U.~ntn ~M~1 R4YViS 1i MQf~~'VW~\ ~c um •r um ~r Pay to .16.632~. 66 Amount Municipal Electric Job Training Electric . i ution c/oF'red Wautera, Secretary/'treasurer Department 10/24/84 P. 0. Sox 218 Date Floresville, Texas 78114 A ct . Salanc Invoice date, number and or ex anation Account No 'Net Inv, Amo7nt Municipal Electric Employee Training Program Dues -Texas A & M 610-008-0252- 8522-E926 $4,329.68 TOTAL _$43329,68 The abov~ has Len reviewed and recommendation f payment is made by the undersigned. ~-7 0 0 Accounting Approyal Sign ure City Manager Approval 11ector of Finance Approval 1 MUNI01PAL BLIOTRIO TRAINING DUZ8 Municipal Electric Job Training t Safety Program C/O Fred wautors, Secretary/Treasurer Manager of Utllltles City of Floresville P4O4 Sox 218 Floreiv111e, Texas 78114 The City of Denton will participate In the Municipal Electric Training Program. Our commitment to the Munlelpal Electric Training Committee for fiscal year September 1, 1984, through August 31, 1985, in the amount of $ 41329.68 Is enclosed. Please Invoice our city for this amount $ Systems where combined meters do not exceed 1,000 and are geographleally located to permit joint classes may participate at minimum rate. Your 1983-1984 contribution was $ 3802'50 please bring your meter status to a current count. 1,000 Meters Minimum Rate $1640.00 91000 Meters e 21.6 e. 1944,00 13,809 Meters a 5.4 c 745.68 Meters a 4.32 4 Meters a 3.24 0 Total $ Your contribution must be submitted to the cretary/Treasurer no later than August 31, 1984. Official Signature Title Assistant Director, Utilities Electric Division ~ Dues Formula 0 - 1,000 Meters Minimum Rate $1640.00 Next 9,000 Meters a 21.6c 10,001 - 30,000 a 5,4c 30,001 - 130,000 a 4.324 1301001+ Q 3,244 (Revised 062984) bog OAKLAND DENTON, TEXAS 70201 M E M O R A N D U M JOELLA OAR, DIRECTOR TOs BETTY McKEAN, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER FROM: J08LUA ORR, LIBRARY DIRECTOR SUBJ., POLICY MANUAL FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL DATE; October 30, 1984 Attached you will find a copy of the newly edited and complete policy manual as recommended for approval by the Library Board. Also included are the resolutions for acceptance of the policy manual as written by Joe Morris, and the paperwork necessary to put this on the first available City Council agenda. I have included for your information, the copy of the manual with the changes that Jae Morris indicated wei,e necessary. They have been made. 1 i Joella Or , Library Director ci 0411H R E S O L U T I O N BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That in accordance with Section 2-52 of Chapter 2 of the Code of Ordinances, the policy manual, as recommended by the Library Board, containing policies and procedures for the operation of the Emily Fowler Public Library, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Benton, Texas. SECTION II. This Resolution shall become effective from and after its date of passage. PASSED AND r.PPROVED this the day of 1984. RIMD 0. 879WART~ MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS DYE POLICIES OF THE EMILY FOWLER PUBLIC LIBRARY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DENTON LIBRARY BOARD September 1984 M1. INTRODUCTION Brief History of tho Library Creation of the Denton Library Board Qualifioations, Seleotion, Appointment, Number, Term, and Tenure of the Board Duties and Responsibilities of the Denton Library Board Staff, Board, and Library Direotor Relationships Ooals of the Rmily Fowler Publia Library BRIEe HISTORY OF THE LIBRARY As oarly as 19140 the City Federation of Women's Clubs gave this report irj its bulletin; "One of the clubs devoted much time some years ago to tho subject of a free public library for Denton and received from Mr. Andrew Carnegie the assurance that a suitable building would be contributed by him if the city could contribute its part in location and maintenance. The City Counoil would not guarantee municipal support," Later, Carnegie withdrew his offer. In the depression years of the early 1930'x, the Federal government established many agencies to furnish employment, food, clothes, education, and services of various kinds throughout the United States. Among these services Mere the W.P,A, programs which included the sponsorship of school libraries. This enabled the schools, u;tder the ler,dership of the Denton County Superin- tendent, to employ Miss Mattis Pyrene Wilson as the library supervisor and to establish a program of oounty-wide service, In order to expedite this systam, a bookmobile service was inaugurated, Miss Wilson opened a srall 3,000 volume library on the third floor of the courthouse. The bulk of the library material was primarily acquired through two armr(`en: a $10 state teacher allowanoe for the purchase of librar, books and the donation of gift books by the Denton County Parent Teacher Association and sundry county organizations, In 1935 the Junior Shakespeare Club began a movement to combine the Denton County School Library with a public library. The olub suggested that the county school board, the city commission, and the county commission form a coalition to support a library which would be free to all oitizons of Denton County. The members of the Junior Shakespeare Club, in an attempt to stock the proposed library, oolleoted more than 4,000 books in a house-to-house can- vass of the city. The city commission then agreed to donate $600 toward the purchase of new books, and the county agreed to furnish shelves, equipment, and utilities. Finally, Denton's first public library opened on June 6, 1937. Shortly after the new library opened, however, Miss Wilson resigned her position, and Mrs. Bess MoCullar was employed as the library supervisor. Her staff included approximately twenty W,P.A. assistants who were being 3 trained in various capacities of library service. Under Mrs, MoCullar's direction, a branch library was established for the black population of Denton and was housed in the Jones' Undertaking Company Chapel, This branch, how- ever, was discontinued in 1948, Preceding World War 11, the mounting number of books and nonbook materials necessitated the removal of the library to the southwest corner of the courthouse, With the advent of World War 11, the publio library experi- enoed a temporary cessation of expansion in funds, facilities, and library materials. Furthermore, the W,P.A, assistants, the salary of the Library Director and bookmobile drivers, and the gas and oil funds were terminated. In February, 1943, Mrs. Otis Fowler succeeded Mrs. MoCullar as Library Director, Because of the growth in library collections, a new library facility was needed. In 1949, the City of Denton donated a tract of land on Oakland Street for a new building; a $50,000 bond issue was passed to build the struo- ture, and Che Denton Lions Club raised the funds to purchase the furnishings. On July 30, 1949, the Denton City-County Public Library officially opened. With an ever-inoreasing population and subsequent demand for reading mate- rials, the library's collection grew to 310497 cataloged volumes as well as a large quantity of uncataloged materials, Again, the library lacked adequate space to house the total contents of the library. In visw of the overcrowded facilities, the citizens of Denton approved a $100,000 bond issue for library improvement on March 17, 1964, Then on July 13, 1968, the Denton City-County Library closed in order to expand and renovate the old library. Ford, Powell, and Carson of San Antonio were the architects for the new building, which was approximately 11,000 square feet, quadrupling the size of the old building. This new building, at a total cost of $240,000, was designed to contain a total of 55,000 volumes. 'Phe new facility opened on February 2, 1969. The library was renamed the Emily Fowler Library in recognition of Mrs, Fowler's many years of service to the ohmmunity, Having become a department of the City of Denton the library now served the county on a contractual basis. In view of the information explosion of the 19701x, Denton voters, on February 28, 1978, approved a $775,000 bond issue for library expansion and renovation. On February 19, 19801 the Denton City Council approved the plans and specifications and also voted an additional $300000 in certificates of 4 obligation for the building, Architects Ford, Powell and Carson of San Antonio; and Moyer, Landry and Landry of Dallas, designed the new 25,000 square foot building. On October 6, 1981, the Denton City Council formally changed the library name to the Denton Public Library. At the same time the City Council paid tribute to Mrs. Emily Fowler by designating the library's collection of Local History and Texana and the room in whioh it is housed the Emily Fowler Historical Collection. On November 10 1981, the Friends of the Denton Public Library spon- sored an open house to dedicate the new library formally. On February 15, 1983, the Denton City Counoil reconsidered its deoi- sion and renamed the library the Emily Fowler Public Library. On October 1, 19840 the County discontinued its funding for all libraries within Denton County. CREATION OF THE DENTON LIBRARY BOARD The initial Denton Library Board was created by joint action of the City Council and Commissioners' Court through the City-County Library Contract;. The first Library Board was organized Wednesday, January 31, 1968, in the Municipal Auditorium in the City of Denton. The first Library Board member-3 were Mr. Dan Dudley, Chairman; Mrs. Sam Barton, Vice Chairman; Mrs. Robert Caldwell, Secretary; Mr. J. T. Jones (Denton City Council member); Mr. 0, H. Bailey (Denton County Auditor); Mr. Sammy Spratt; Dr, David Speck; Mr. Emmett Brown; Mr. Bill Thomas; and Mrs. Joella Orr (Library Director). 5 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DENTON LIBRARY BOARD The Library Director and the Library Board are partners in determin- ing the program of service undertaken by the Emily Fowler Public Library and in safeguarding its future, Success in these endeavors is contingent upon a mutual confidence and respect between the Library Director and the members of the Board and upon the appropriate sharing of administrative and policy making responsibilities. The Library Board carries a major responsibility in the determination of policy to be recommended to the City Managor related to the functioning of the library, In undertaking this responsibility, it relies upon the profes- sional training, judgment, and experience of the Library Director in making recommendations about policy matters to the Board. In turn, the Board weighs and evaluates these recommendations in view of the information available to it through human and material resources, coupled with its knowledge of the com- munity, interaction with individual citizens and groups, and its collective experience. A secondary responsibility of the Board is seeing that policies are properly carried out by the Library Director. As an agent of the City Coun- oil, the Library Board is charged with assuring the effective administration of the library. All concerns which the Board may have about the administra- tion of the library, i.e., the carrying out of policies determined by the Board, are directed toward the Library Director and/or the City Managers The above stated responsibilities are paramount to the Board's exist- ence. However, it is recognized that these are not the Board's only responsi- b bilities. The Denton Library Board endorses the statement of duties and responsibilities for library board members which is included by Virginia C, Young in The Library Trustee (3rd ed, New Yorki R,R, Bowker, 1978). Adjusted to fit local circumstances, they are enumerated as followsi 1. Determine and adopt written polioies to govern the operation and pro- grams of the library; 2, heter.nine the purposes of the library and secure adequate funds to ottirry on the library's programs; 3. Know the programs and needs of the library in relation to the oommu- nity; keep abreast of standards and library trends; plan and carry out the library programs; 4. Establish, support, and participate in a planned public relations program; 5. Know local and state laws; actively support library legislation in the state and nation; 6. Establish among the library policies those dealing with book and material selection; 7. Attend all board meetings and see that accurate records are kept on file with the city secretary; 8. Attend regional, state, and national trustee meetings and workshops, and affiliate with the appropriate professional organizations; 9. Be aware of the services of the state library; and 10. Report regularly to the governing officials and the general public, Members of the Board, olleotively or individually, represent the library to the people and to the officials of the city of Denton, However, authority and responsibility rest only in the Board as a whole. Any responsi- bility and authority granted to board members for undertaking special projects must be delegated by the Board through formal action. The Library Director carries a major responsibility for making recom- mendations to the Library Board based upon professional judgment, an awareness of community needs and the services provided by organizations in the public and private sectors to meet those needs, and the utilization of monetary resources available to the library. The Denton Library Board endorses the statement of duties and responsibilities for public librarians which is included by Virginia C. Young in The Library Trustee (3rd ed. New York; R.R. Bowker, 1978), adjusted here to fit local oiroumstancesi 7 1. Act as technical advisor to the board, recommend needed policies for board action, and supervise personnel; 24 Carry out the policies of the library as adopted by the board, and approved by the City Counoil; 3. Suggest and carry out plans for extending library servioes; 4. Prepare regular reports embodying the library's current progress and future needs; cooperate with the board to plan and carry out the library's programs; 5. Maintain an active program of public relations; 6. Know local and state laws; actively support library legislation in the state and nation; 7. Supervise seleo tlon of books and other library materials; 8. Attend all board meetings other than those in which the library director's own salary or tenure are under discussion; 9. Affiliate with the state and national professional organizations and attend professional meetings and workshops; 10. Make use of the services and consultants of the state library; and 11. Report regularly to the library board, to the officials of local government, and to the general public. STAFF, BOARD, AND LIBRARY DIRECTOR RELATIONSHIPS The Library Director serves as the liaison agent between the Library Board and the library staff. Under the policies adopted by the Library Board, the. Library Director will administer the library and direct the library staff. The library staff has responsibility for public relations inside and outside the library. Members of the staff are encouraged to suggest improve- ments in library service and operations. These suggestions are forwarded when appropriate by the Library Director to the Library Board. The Board serves as the liaison between the library and the public and between the library and government officials. Its members advise the Library Director of community needs and promote the library and its services to the public. a ry GOALS OF THE EMILY FOWLER PUBLIC LIBRARY The mission of the Emily Fowler Public Library is to assure every individual access to needed information at the time needed and in a format the individual can use. In view of this mission statement the goals of the library are: TO SERVE the community as a o6nter of reliable information, TO BUILD the best possible collection of materials and to organize it for ease of access to the users. TO PROVIDE opportunity for enrichment through use of literature, music, films and other art eorms. TO ENCOURAOE the public to use the library and to recognize its impor- tanoe in their lives. TO PROVIDE the citizens of the community with individualized planned learning experiences. TO SUPPORT the educational, oivio and cultural activities of groups and organizations. TO PROVIDE guidance services to patrons who are engaged, or intend to be engaged, in an educational aotivity, TO PROVIDE local government officials with information and perform research as needed, TO PLAY an initiatory role, with other agencies and institutions, in identifying community needs and providing programs and services to meet those needs, TO PROVIDE materials beyond the library's oolleotion through interlibrary loan. 9 GENERAL POLICIES Servioes Limitations of Servioes Bulletin Boards and Publioity Announoements Meeting Rooms I SERVICES The library selects from the mass of available materials and organ- izes for easy access those books and materials which best meet the needs of the public. The book collection of the Emily Fowler Public Library consists of honoiroulating referenoe tools and circulating library materials. Both types oonsist of titles considered basic for public library purposes and are the foundation of book stook which reflect the needs and interests of the people, Materials for all age groups are inoludedi adults, young adults, and children. In all three groups, recreational and eduoational materials are represented in fiction and non-fiction. The library provides information and materials to help people to: 1. Equip themselves for efficient activities in useful occupations and practical affairs, including vocational information, parent and home education, child care, nutrition, physical health, emotional stabil- ity and growth, budgeting and consumer information, and speoialized business, industrial, and agricultural information. 21 Increase their competence to form sound judgments on public problems and to encourage them to express their opinions and to act aooording to their ,judgment. 3. Increase their understanding and appreciation of literature, the arts, sciences, and the political and natural world. 4. Promote personal and social well-being and develop creative and spiritual capacities. The library cooperates with other community agencies and organiza- tions to determine and meet the educational needs of the community and to help them with their programs through such services as special bibliographies, materials, and exhibits. The library accepts a responsibility for securing information beyond its own resources by collecting information about, and listing for referral, resources of agencies, institutions, organizations, and individuals in and beyond the community. Circulation in the Emily Fowler Public Library provides books for home use for the period of time specified by the Library Direotor as directed by the Library Board. Rare, fragile, and expensive items which normally do not ciroulats may be loaned only at the discretion of the Library Director. 11 I The professional staff of the library aids patrons, in person and by telephone, with researoh activities and giving information from the library resources to the extent of these resouroes. Staff are available to aid students and adult user's of the library in the use of indexes, atlases, and so forth, whioh are part of the library resouroes, To the extent possible with the available staff and time, the per- sonnel of the library assist individuals and groups i;% the area of planning programs using library materials, and encourage and sponsor group activities which are library oriented and which are designed to further interest in the use of library materials, The library initiates programs, exhibits, book lists, and so forth to stimulate the use of library materials for the enlightenment of people of all • ages. The Board reoognizes that no single library can meet all demands in its community. Libraries in different politioal subdivisions working together, sharing their servl,ees and resources, can meet more nearly the full needs of their users. The L:;,brary Board and the Library Director are alert to opportunities of cooperation with other libraries in order to strengthen the services and resources of the library. The image of the library in this county is well served with the establishment of good public relations, To this end, the Library Director is concerned with the preparation of bibliographies and book lists, displays of appropriate materials in the library building, news releases of library aotiv- ities for various media, and the cultivation of a friendly and helpful atti- tude toward serving all library patrons. LIMITATIONS OF SERVICES The use of the library or its services shall be limited when gsxoes- sive demands of groups or individuals tend to curtail services to the general public. Such demands may inolude those made by students, puzzle contestants, and others whose demands on staff time, available materials, or space would prohibit attention and service to other individuals or, groups. Information service does not include providing information which is judgmental in nature) rather, the Library Director will direct the patron to 12 sources of information. Falling into the category of judgmental are requests for advice on suoh subjects as medioine, law, and consumer affairs. The use of the library or its services may be denied for due cause. Such cause may be failure to return books or to pay penalties, destruction of library property, disturbance of other patrons, or any other objeotional con- duot on library premises, A referral record will be kept. BULLETIN BOARDS AND PUBLICITY ANNOUNCEMENTS The Emily Fowler Public Library maintains several bulletin boards throughout the library. In its capacity as a public institution, the library schedules educational, oultural, and recreational activities for the oommu- nity. Because of the needs of the library in publicizing these events, and for the dissemination of information on library materials and services, the library has priority access to bulletin board space. Any remaining space on bulletin boards is available for use by the public. The following guidelines govern such use; 1. The event publioized should be for a oultural, eduoational, reorea- tional or civic purpose and be a nonprofit event. Events which will not be publicized include those which are for religious purposes, for oommeroial purposes (including money-raising events by individuals or groups such as bake sales and garage sales) or for any purpose whioh furthers an individual's goals; 2. The event must be open to all citizens in the community; 3. The event must be free of charge. Exceptions are made for nonprofit, local organizations of a oivio nature which provide cultural, educa- tional, and recreational programs for, the community. Such organiza- tions include those granted tax ex,,rir~t. status. 4. Posters and announcements must relate directly to the event sche- duled. Posters outside of the events listed in item one above are not permissible, for example, fund raising posters, promotions related to political campaigns, eto.; 54 Posters and announcements must be smaller than 22" x 1411 in size; 6. The Library Director is responsible for determining which items may be displayed; final authority rests with the Library Board; 13 7. Posters and announcements are displayed through the date(s) of the event and are removed and aisoarded within a reasonable length of time after the event; and 8. The library is not responsible for damage to or loss of posters and announcements. MEETING ROOMS Rooms may be used by educational, oultural, oivio, and governmental groups for programs and meetings. Room reservations must be made with the Library Direotor. The following guidelines govern the use of meeting rooms; 1. Meetings must be soheduled during regular library hours; 2. The event must be open to all oitizens in the community; 30 The event must be free of oharge; 4. Rooms oannot be reserved as the regular meeting plaoe for any organi- zation; 5. Library personnel are not available to assist in the handling of a exhibits and other materials needed by groups using the room; 6. Seating oapaoity is governed by the Fire Marshall. Additional seating may be proviued by the organization reserving the rooms, with the organization being responsible for delivering, setting up, and removing the seating; 7. Neither smoking nor refreshments are allowed in the rooms. 14 MATERIALS SELECTION Materials Seleotion Polioy Library Bill of Rights Responsibility Seleotion Prinoiples Seleotion Criteria Use of Material Seleotion Aids bifts Colleotion Maintenance Requests for Reoonsideration of Materials MATERIALS SELECTION POLICY The purpose of the materials selection policy of the Emily Fowler, Public Library is to present guidelines for the selection of library materials and statements on intellectual freedom. Free and convenient access Uo the world of ideas, to information, and to the creative experience is of vital importance to every citizen today. The Emily Fowler Public Library endorses the preamble of the Intellectual Freedom Statement adopted by the Texas Library Association which states in part "the freedom to read is a corollary of the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press. Freedom of choice in selecting materials is a necessary safeguard to the freedom to read, and shall be protected against extra-legal, irresponsible attempts by self-appointed censors to abridge it. The Assooih- tion believes that it is the essence of democracy that citizens shall have the right of free inquiry and the equally important right of forming their own opinions, and that it is of the utmost importance to the continued existence of demooracy that freedom of the press in all forms of public communication be defended and preserved." The Emily Fowler Public Library also incorporates as part of this policy the Library Sill of Rights, adopted by the Council of the American Library Association, January 22, 1980. LIBRARY BILL OF RIGHTS The American Library Association affirms that all libraries are forums for information and ideas, and that the following basic polioies should guide their servioes: 1. Books and other library resources should be provided for the inter- est, information, and enlightenment of all people of the community the library serves. Materials should not be excluded because of the origin, background, or views of those contributing to their creation. 21 Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and historical issues. Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval. 16 3. Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment. 4, Libraries should cooperate with all persons and groups concerned with resisting abridgment of free expression and free access to ideas, 50 A person's right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background, or views. b. Libraries which m.,~ ibit spaoes and meeting rooms available to the public they r:!• Should make such facilities available on an equitable basis, regardless of the beliefs or affiliations of indivi- duals or groups requesting their use, The Emily Fowler Publio Library also subscribes to the interpretative statements for the Library Bill of Rights adopted by the Council of the Ameri- can Library Association and the jrinaiples set forth in the Freedom to Read Statement. In acoordanoe with American Library Association guidelines, the Emily Fowler Public Library recognizes its responsibility to oolleot materials, to organize and make available its resources, to give guidance in the use and interpretation of materials, and to provide interlibrary loan services. The materials selection polioy supports these purposes of the library. The library exists to promote free access to books and other mate- rials for oontinuous education, cultural development, and constructive use of leisure time. These goals are implemented through intelligently selected materials for children, young adults, and adults. As a cultural and educational institution, this library must utilize its limited funds by adhering to a materials seleotion policy designed to pro- vide the best available materials in assisting the democratic prooess of free communication of ideas. The library provides informational material for reference in furnish- ing direct answers to specific questions. Beyond that, this library also pro- vides materials of a general educational nature and literature for leisure. Broadly, the needs and interests of Denton furnish the orientation for seleo- tion, To satisfy these needs and interests involvel identification of books and other materials designed to meet, immediate demanUs for information on, or interpretation of, ourrent issues. 17 RESPONSIBILITY The ultimata source or responsibility for determining the materials selection policies of the library is the Denton Library Board. Operating within this framework, the Library Director carries out these policies with the assistance of a professional staff which initiates book selection within the areas of service to children, to young adults, and to adults. SELECTION PRINCIPLES Oenerally, material selection is geared to the objectives of library servioa outlined above--to provide the best available materials, to aid those pursuing formal and informal educational aotivities, occupational enrichment, and spiritual and creative development. All sidei of controversial issues will be presented through a collection containing the best possible balance of available materials of opposing viewpoints. For these purposes, a large general collection of books and other library materials is necessary. Each r title is judged on its own merit and on its value to Denton and its citizens. Effort is made to select titles of current interest which will have value in the ftiture as well. The following principles are basic to a useful collection: 1. Selection is coupled with the discard or withdrawal of worn, out- dated, and damaged materials. 2. Duplication is made of materials when such materials are still valid and in demand. Paperbacks may be used to satisfy a temporary, heavy demand. 3. Highly specialized materials r6quested by individual patrons are made available by interlibrary loan, 18 SELECTION CRITERIA Materials purchased for the library's collections must adhere to the following high standards: 1. The subject matter should complement the library's collection. 2. The subjecL matter should have validity, accuracy, and timeliness, 3. The author should have expertise and considerable repute in the field. 4. The price, format, and in some instances the scarcity of certain materials, should be considered. 5, The materials selected should have ease of use, readability, and popular appeal. USE OF MATERIAL SELECTION AIDS Ideally all materials, before acquisition, should be evaluated by a librarian with trained judgment, knowledge of the 14'.brary's present resources, and acquaintance with the requirements of local patrons, Where circumstances make such evaluation impossible, the staff makes skilled use of selection aids, such as basic general lists, current general lists, book reviewing jour- nals, and special bibliographies of reference books or particular subject materials. While reviews are a major source of information about new mate- rials, they are not followed blindly, No one publication is relied upon exclusively; the critical opinions of reviewers are checked against each other. GIFTS Gifts represent a way through which the people of the community can contribute to the library. The aooeptanoe of gifts is subject to the fol- lovring considerations: 1. Gifts must meet the same oriteria as other materials to be included in the library collection. 2, Materials which are not outright gifts will not be accepted (see Appendix A). 19 3, gooks and other matai-ials will be accepted on the condition that the Library Director has the authority to make whatever disposition is advisable. 4. Memorials will be selected by the Library Director and the donor from lists of materials needed by the library, Written acknowledgment for each gift will be made to the donor and to the relative or relatives designated, 5. Personal property, art objects, portraits, antiques, and other museum objects will be screened by the Library Director. 6. Oifts of money, real property, or stock will be accepted if oondi- tions attached therato are acceptable to the Denton Library Board and to the City Council. COLLECTION MAINTENANCE Weeding (the removal of materials from library collections) is the process by which collections are maintained. Weeding must be a continuous process in order to maintain the library's collections in their most useful and attractive condition. In general, the same criteria apply to weeding as are used in the selection of materials. The professional staff will consider for withdrawal materials which are: 1. badly worn or damaged and which cannot be repaired, unless the materials are irreplaceable; 2. limited in their use because of certain physical characteristics, e.g., fine print, brittle paper, etc.; 3. no longer of interest or demand based upon the circulation of and requests for the material; 4, duplicates of titles for which there is no longer user interest and demand (no more than five copies of a title will be carried on library records); and 5. outdated because of developments in the subject area or which have been superseded by newer and/or, more accurate edition3, Community interest and the existence of the item in libraries other than the Emily Fowler Public Library, e.g., the university libraries in Denton 20 or the libraries within the North Texas Library System, are important oriteria when considering the withdrawal of the last copy of a title, Discarded materials may be sold to the Friends of the Library for its book sales, if' in the judgment of the professional staff they would be of interest to the public. The Library Director may dispose of all other with- drawn library materials in whatever manner is appropriate. REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS It is recognized that a library patron has the right to protest mate- rials, The patron may initiate review of any item by completing a reoonsid- eration form (see Appendix B), Upon completing the form, the patron will meet with the Library Director to discuss the nature of the complaint. Further action related to the objection may be referred to the Library Board, The patron will be notified and must appear at the Library Board meeting at whioh the request is to be acted upon. 21 CIRCULATION General Loan Polioy Registration of Borrowers Materials Loan Limitations Speoial Loans Fines/Overdoes/Loss or Damage of Materials GENERAL LOAN POLICY The library serves all residents of the City of Denton, Religious, raoial, sooio-eoonomio, or political status are not factors in the provision of service. REOISTRATION OF BORROWERS Any person meeting the residence and identification requirements listed below is entitled to a library borrower's card free of oharges 1. Adult applicants who state that they are a permanent resident of the City of Denton and give a valid address are eligible for a library oard free of oharge. To rooeive a card, the applicant completes a patron registration form and presents proper identification, 2, Children are issued a library card when their application is signed by a parent or guardian, The parent or guardian must meet the resi denoe and identification requirements lisisd above and must aasume all responsibility for material borrowed from the ,library. 3. An applicant, adult or child, who is not a resident of the City of Denton but who is a permanent resident of a contracting agency and who meets all the requirements above may be issued a library card with full privileges, u, An applicant, adult or child, who is not a resident of the City of Denton and who meets the requirement of proof of address may be issued a library card with full privileges upon payment of an out- of-oity fee. This fee is determined by the City Council upon recom- mendation of the Library Board. The library card is valid for a twelve month period beginning with the date upon which the fee is paid and the card issued. No refunds will be made for any portion of the fee if library materials are not borrowed during the twelve month period. 23 MATERIALS LOAN All materials except those whioh are in special demand and oar~ot he doplioated, including rare and fragile items, will. be lent for home use under IM-cry regulations and rrooedures, LIMITATIONS The circulation of materials is governed by the following limitations; to Seasonal or currently in-demand materials may be limited to seven days by the Library Dire-otor. Limitations may change or vary with the developitent of the ocllootion. 2. 16mm films may not be shown for fund-raising or commercial purposes or where admission is charged, Films are not for classroom use. 36 Borrowers must have a library card and valid identification before being allowed to check out a film and must submit a "user,, report" for the film borrowed. Borrowers must also sign a statement of responsibility agreeing to pay any and all charges for repair and/or replacement of film damaged while in their possession. Charges are determined by the staff of the North Trxds Library System in Fort Worth, the source of most of the library's films, The library does not furnish the use of a 16mm projector and does not allow an indivi- dual or an agency to check out more than four films a month. 4. Nonbook materiala must be returned in the oontainors provided and must not be returned in the book drop. SPECIAL LOANS Exceptions to the general loan policy may be made concerning refer- enoe books and fragile or nonbook materials wYiuh are charged to and received directly by subject departments. The policy and fees relating to circulation of these special materials <re as followsi 1. Special loans are made only to individuals; loans to institutions are handled as interlibrary loans. 24 2, Speoial loans are not renewable. 3. The Library Director may limit the number of vertical file or pamph- let file materials if there is a heavy demand on a sub,jeot. Overdue charges for this matQvial are on a per packet basis. 4. Special permission may be granted by the Library Director foi, loan of items not usually oiroulated, FINES/OVERDOES/LOSS OR DAMAGE OF MATERIALS The policies governing fines, overdues, loss or damage of materials are as follows: 11 Current charges or fines will be displayed near the circulation desk, 26 Library oards will be replaced at oost, 36 Fines will not be charged for days when the library is olosed. 4. All materials will remain the property of the City of Denton regard- less of the amount of fines paid. 5. Charges for ma erials lost or damaged beyond repair will be the cur- rent price of the materials plus the cost of processing. 6. The Library Director shall be responsible for assessing the value or cost of suoh pamphlets, clippings, piotures, and other speoially handled and loaned materials. 7. The library will take every measure to ensure the return of library materials. In certain instances, this may involve the city attor- ney's offioe. 25 Appendix A EMILY FOWLER PUBLIC LIBRARY DEN TON, TEXAS of the County of Denton, State of Texas, in consideration of my interest in education in the fields of literature and the liberal arts and sciences, and in further consi- deration of the efforts of the Library Board of the Emily Fowler Public Library and the City of Denton to administer, maintain, and equip the Emily Fowler Public Library as a facility for the advancement and support of educa- tion, do hereby give, grant, confirm, and convey unto the said Emily Fowler Public Library of the City of Danton, all and singular, the following pro- perty, to wit: and I do hereby release, remise, and forever quitclaim unto the said Emily Fowler Public Library all of my right, title, and interest in and to said property, Dated this day of , 191 Signature Address 26 Appendix U REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY MATERIALS Title Book„ Periodical. Other Author Publisher Request initiated byi Address _ City State Zip _ _ Telephone Do you represento Yourself An organization (name) Other group (name) 1, To what in the work do you object? Please be specific. Cite pages. 2, Did you read the entire work? What parts? 3. What do you feel might be the result of reading this work? 4. For what age group would you recommend this work? 5. What do you believe is the theme of this work? 6. Are you aware of judgments of this work by literary critics? 27 7. What would you like your library to do about this work? Do not lend it to my child. Return it to the staff seleotion oommittes/department for reevaluation. other, Explains 8. In its plaoe, what work would you reoommend that would oonvey as valuable a pioture and perspeotive of the subjeot treated? Signature Date 28 DENTON PUBLIC LIBRARY LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES The regular mooting of the Denton Library Board wan held on Thursday, 27 September 1984 in the Board Room of the Denton Public Library at 700 p.m. PRESENT; A. Travelle (chairman), R. Hutton (acting secretary), S, Lockhart, K, McCallon, and J, Orr, ABSENT; K. Ferstl (ex), L. Gonzales (ex',, M, Nichols (ex), R, Lookabaugh (ex), and R. Stephens (ex) GUEST; 1, S, Lockhart moved, K. McCallon seconded, that the minutes of the 26 July 1984 meeting be approved as corrected. Motion carried unanimously, 2, County Patron Fees: J, Orr reported that the City Council would take action related to the user fee for county residents (i,e,, non-Denton residents) at its next meeting, Eleven dollars ($11) was pr.)posed as an appropriate user fee at the last Council meeting, 3, 1984/85 Approved Budget; The City Council approved a budget of $561,359 for the Library for fiscal year 1.984/85, This budget includes 25 sta':'f positions, an increase of two over the previous fiscal year, 4. Resolution of Appreciation of Margaret Nichols; R, Hutton moved, S. Lockhart seconded, that J. Orr send a memo to B. McKeon requesting M. Nichols be recognized by the City Council for her steadfast service as liaison representative for the County Commissioners and that a book be added to the Library's collection in her honor, Motion passed unanimously, 5, Old Business LA rr reported that the revisions and corrections have been completed on Library's policy manual and that the text is at the City Manager's ce, Members of the Policy Manual Revision Committee were: K, Ferstl, utton, S. Marino, and L, Miller (chair), Library changed to its winter schedule the first week in October, ary hours are: Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday; 9;00 a,m, :00 p,m,; Tuesday and Thursday, 9:00 a,m, to 8;00 p,m,; Sunday Monday, closed, cent citizen survey of city services revealed that library services ed the highest of all services provided by the city, 6, K. McCallon moved, S. Lockhart seconded, that the meeting is adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. The motion a,-as adjourned at 8;25 p.m, CJ/ s ~i cirYofvENroN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M E, M 0 it A N 1) U M TO; t,hris Hartung, CiLy Manager 111201; [tick Smita, Assistant Lily Managor DATE'l Novolobor ld , 1984 6U11J1:i(;T; Resolution ill favor of Cotuity Transportation Plan On Octobel• 20, 1984, tho County Transportation Group met to discuss the possibilities o1 a transportl.ltiOll p.lan, At Lcl,kL tilde, Ms, Sandy Jacobs, County Collin] issioner, indicated tililt Llle (,eL1111)' [lad I:Ulldeu 10011ey i111d that they Were road)' to begin looking at a transportation plan, Sile said tllo County was anxious to gat input fruln ati of the cities, TIt is resolilt iolr urges Lire County to appro1) r i a L C money to hire a consultant and to formulate a plan for the County, It would incorporate and tie into existing plans Lliat each ci Ly ilt tle county rniglit have anu would also establish priorities "or the COMIC), pull, Finally, and I.xobably most importantly, it would ustaulistl rigilt -of - way w idths and sLalldards for county Coll stauclioil ill the future, Since We Coll Linue Lo grow, 14e thInK this is of major cOn Cu, r11 to us as we annex county Lac i1ities in tlic future, if )'OU or the COMIC iI 114VC furtler yucstiolls, i would be happy to try and vespond to tllenl at the nice Ling, 41a [tic - SvAssistant City Manager ji 1,000h1 930L R E S 0 L U T l 0 N WHEREAS, Denton County the fourth fastest growing county iti the country is facing a mobility crisis; and WHEREAS, Denton County and it's cities nood to dellalop a systematic approach that will set priorities, indicate when and which transportation improvements are needed; and WHEREAS, Denton County Commissioners' Court needs to implement r. program to help meet our future right-of-way needs due to our phenomenal growth factor and escalating land values; and WHEREAS, this resolution confirms thia city's support and participation in the development of a county wide transportation plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS. SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas supports the Commissioners' Court intent to hire a consulting firm to develop a technical transportation guide designed to result in a program of transportation improvements for Denton County during the next two decades. SECTION It. The technical transportation guide would include 1. Developing a county-wide plan for a transportation network that is responsive to future growth; 2. Providing the necessary coordination among existing throughfare plans of individual cities within Denton County for the development of a integrated roadway network; 3. Establiuhing a roadway classification system; 4. Recommending a geometric and design standards for roadway development for both rural and urban conditions along with cost estimating procuuures for use in throughfare planning; 5. Right-of-way plans.for use by the county and citieH in order to reserve right-of-way during the development plat process; and M G, Recommending a program for staged development of freeways, urban arterials, rural arterials and controlled access facilities which will be compatible with incremental growth development to 2005 to insure continuity of mayor roadways an timely roadway construction. SECTION III. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984. RICRARD 0. STEWART$ MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST Z`117CALdTTE° r-TL'LEA,~ITY'~~Y CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORW JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: 1; , v~ l i SAY; J'APOI)S co>,irlls~icintlk . COMMISSIONERS COURT OF 6ENTON COUNTY JOSEPH A. CARROLL COURTS SVILDINO 401 W. HICKORY - DPNFON, TEAS 75201 15171 357.3414 ' METHO 434.1745 PRECINCT BARN 4353721 October 31, 1984 Dear Interested Parties, On October 301 1964, the Denton County Transportation Comml+•tee met to discuss the specifics relating to hiring a consultant for a county-wide transportation plan. The purpose of the discussion was to review and define the scope of this project in order to write a Request For Proposal to solicit bids from profejsional consultants, Enclosed is a sample resolution in support of a transportation plan which addresses the objectives of this project. Also included is a copy of the Collin County Request For Proposal utilized in hiring their trans- portation consultant in 1901. A similar resolution was passed by the Denton County Commissioners' Court on August 17, 1984 along with $100,000,00 set aside in this years budget to hire outside professional assistance. The Denton County Transportation Committee as well as the Commissioners' Court welcomes your city council's input in order to develop a Request For Proposal. Please have your city council consider the sample resolution or pass one of their own as soon as possible. You should mail a copy of your resolution to the Transportation Committee Secretary/Treasure, The Honorable Olive Stephens, Mayor of Shady Shores, Her. address is Box 362, Lake Dallas, Texas 75065. The Denton County Transportation Committee will meet again to further discuss this project on Thursday, November 29, at the Carroll Courts Building, at 700 P.M. We hope to have all tO resolutions returned by then, I want to encourage your support in this effort. Unity and harmony today will enhance the transportation of tomorrow in Denton County. Sincerely, Sandy Jacobs SJrpl Commissioner REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICY FOR COLLIN COUNTY 10 INTRODUCTION The Commissioners Court of Collin County, Texas, invites your submission of a proposal for the development of a transportation plan and implementation policy for 0,6111n County. It is the purpose of this document to provide information for the development of that proposal and to provide guidance for its content and objectives. IL OBJECTIVE Collin County'is rapidly transitioning from a rural county to an urban county, With its population having grown from 68,920 in 1970 to an estimated 1980 population of over1300000, Collin County contains one of the fastest growing cities In Texas. This growth has necessitated leadership on the part of Collin County in providing plans- for transportation systems affecting many of the other in the County. Additionally, major highway projects are currently under development by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. These include the proposed construction of State Highway 190 across the southern portion of, Collin County{ proposed improvements to U.S. Highway 75 through Planol and improvements to S.H. 380, S.H. 121, and F.M. Highway 544, In addition to highway improvements, other transportation systems such as transit are now within the range of possibility for implementation. Local governments in the Dallas/Fort Worth area have recently created the Lone Star Transportation Authority, and work is ourrently underway to develop the initial service plan for the Authority, Portions of Collin County could be included in the Authority provided its services are compatible with the needs of the citizens of Collin County, Collin County also faces problems characteristic of urbanizing counties in preparing for the future of its transportation system. These problems include the unknowns in regard to the availability and price of transportation energy and the environmental concerns related to the transportation system. Inflation and higher costs of proposed transportation improvements, and the ever increasing concern of citizens in regard to tax rates, demand that the Commissioners Court of Collin County develop transportation plans and policies which will permit orderly growth within Collin County and provide the most.beneficial transportation services to its citizens. It is the objective of the work under this requested proposal to develop a transportation plan and implementation policy which will address the above concerns' Work under the proposal should result in an overall transportation concept for Collin County, a thoroughfare plan which will consider areas of rapid urbanization as well as rural transportation needs, and an implementation policy which may be considered by the Commissioners Court for achieving the objectives set forth in the transportation concept and thoroughfare plan. a ITI, SCOPE It is intended that the effort outlined under the requested proposal shall provide a thorough and complete plan of action for transportation improvoments in Collin County, The effort should build upon the data oolleoted and the map system developed under the Collin County Road Plan and Traffic Study, 1949, The scope of the proposal should include but not be limited to the following work elements: Task A - Development of an OverallTrans ortation Concept for Collin Count r This 'ts s to provide direction or the Commissioners our or the total transportation needs of Collin County in a coordinated transportation system of highways, public transportation, and airports. Under this task the following subtesks may be identified: Subtask 1 - Review 'ourrent plans and programs of the State Department of g ways and Public Transportation as they relate to Collin County. Subtask 2 - Review tho current plans of the North Central Texas Council of overnments and the bone Star Transportation Authority as they relate to public trmisportation adjacent to and within Collin County, Subtask 3 - Review the current airport system plan of the North Central Texas ounc 1 of Governments as it relates to airports within Collin County. Subtask 4 - Analyzo the prissent and future transportation needs of Collin C-"ounty they relate to availability of energy, environmental constraints, and projected urban growth. Subtask 5 - Develop an overall transportation concept for Collin County which will meet highway, public transportation, and airport needs of Collin County in a coordinated transportation system. Task B - Developmerrt_of a Thoroughfare Plan for Collin County: This task is to provide a twenty-year plan for thoroughfare development n Collin County which may be utilized by the Commissioners Court and the cities within Collin County to develop the necessary transportation facilities to support the anticipated growth within Collin County during a like period. This effort should include the following subtasks: Subtask 1 - Review of comprehensive plans and major street plans of all cities within Collin County. Subtask 2 - Review and analyze projected travel demand developed by the State epartment of Highways and Public Transportation and the North Central Texas Council of Governments for a twenty year period. Subtask 3 - Analyze the transportation requirements for the rapidly growing po"rTons of Collin County and recommend a roadway system which will meet the demands of the urbanizing area as well as the rural areas of Collin County, ub s 4 Develjip a thoroughfare plan for Collin County which will guide the ' development of roadway construction by the Commissioners Court and provide assistance to cities within CoLUn County through a coordinated plan of roadway development. Task C - Devto M,0 t of an Implementation Policy for Achieving the Ob o t es of the overall CAns o tat on ono t an t Thorotiogsr-eFlAtp s effort ohmlei provide to e Commissioners Court a game pan or implementing the various aspects of the transportation plan. The following subtasks should be inoluded: Subtask 1 - Develop geometric design standards for the elements of the ot~gare plan. This should include design elements of lane width, right-of- way, design speeds, grades, capacity, etos Standards should also consider access management to protect the capacity of the thoroughfare system. Subtask 2 - Develop recommendations for the Commissioners Court for proper coordination with the State Department of Highways and PubUo "Nansportation to obtain for Collin County the highway facilities to meet the needs of the county, Subtask 3 Develop recommendations for the Commissioners Court and the o1tNs Min Collin County for public transportation service which may be provided by the none Star Transportation Authoritys uubtask 4 - DrVelop recommendations for the Commissioners Court for a proper roe or ollin County in the development of general aviation facilities. Subtask 5 - Develop subdivision standards for growth areas of Collin County as they relate to the design and construction of strost facilities within subdivisions wider the immediate control of the Commissioners Court. Subtask 6 - Develop recommendations for consideration by the Commissioners Court o policies and procedures for the most efficient implementation of the overall transportation concept and thoroughfare plan for ColUn County inoluding the funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the transportation system. Task D - Development of a Final Report: This effort will consist of the development o a ra report noorporat`ing all f ridings from previous tasks and the submission of the report in draft form for review by the Commissioners Court. After review and approval by the Court this task shall include the printing of 100 copies of the final approved report. IVs INSTRUCTIONS FOR. PROPOSALS The proposal shall contain the following major items: A. Ideniifioation of the proposers legal name, office loeatlon(s), and principal owner(s) or partners. 01 B, Statement of the proposers understanding of the pp1bjeat including the various tasks and the concepts and methods for acoompUshtng the desired tasks. This should include the overall project strategy demonstrating how all work tasks will be combined into a total effort. C, The Identification of all senior personnel', by name, who will work on the project and the specific role that individual will sill. This shall include the approximate amount of time such Individuals will devote to each task in the project, D. A list identifying the location, cost, client, and brief description of projectr, which are comparable in nature to the effort requested under this proposal, This should also Include the same Information for all parties with whom the proposer might subcontract, or joint venture, including an explanation of the allooation of responsibility, E, A statement of qualifications of the firm submitting the proposal including the size, history, and experience of the firm. 1;, A schedule of activities of the project including an estimate of effort under each task and subtask. V, PROJECT MANAGEMENT Although the final responsibility for the effort under this proposal will rest with the Commissioners Court of Collin County, a management task force will be established to provide day-today management and guidance of the project, This management task force will include staff representatives from the cities within Collin County as well as representatives of citizens groups which can provide major Input to the study effort, Appointment of the management task force shall be accomplished by the Commissioners Court, Tne consultant will be responsible for coordinating all technical activities through the management task force and will work diligently with the task force in the accomplishment of the total effort. Vi, BUDGET The total budget available for Consultant servioes'for this project will not exceed $100,000, The consultant should, as part of his proposal, present an estimated breakdown of his budget by task. VII, SUBMITTAL Ten (10) copies of each proposal should be submitted to the County Judge, Collin County, by or before p,m,, 1980. Should i~ny questions arise in t ig preparation o he proposal, proposers should eon~Act at It or call , VIIL SCHEDULE The consultant shall develop in his proposal a schedule of activities to be accomplished under the proposal, It is assumed that the entire effort can be aaepmplished within six months or less. Notice to proceed will be issued promptly upon contract execution, , lX. SZLEC71ON Proposals will be evaluated on the followings A. The oapabllity and qualifications of the firm to accomplish the objectives of the study effort. H. The proposed method to accomplish the required work. C. Past record of performance on similar efforts and partioularly performance with cities and counties in North Central Texas. While price will be considered In determining the best proposal, price alone will not be the determining factor and the above Items will be deemed most important in the selection of the firm by the Commissioners Court. X. CONTRACT Upon selection, the consultant will be asked to execute a contract with the Commissioners Court of Collin County, A Notice to Proceed will be issued immediately upon execution of the contract. CERTIFICATE FOR RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE CREATION OF A HEALTH FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF CITY OF DENTON, TEXASI APPROVING ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND APPROVING B',LAWS THE STATE OF TEXAS CITY OF DENTON We, the underatgned officers of the City Council of said City hereby certify as followst 11 The C1.ty Council of said City convened in REGULAR MEETING ON THE 20TH DAY OP NOVEMBER, 1984 at the designated meeting place, and the roll was called of the duly constituted officers and members of said City Council, to-wits Richard Stewart: Mayor James Riddlesperger Joe Alford Ray Stephens Mark Chew Charles Hopkins Linnie McAdams and all of said persons were present, except the following absentees; , thus constituting a quorum Whereupon, among other business, the following was transacted at said Meeting; a written RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AIM APPROVING THE CREATION OF A HEALTH FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ON BFHALF OF CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; APPROVING ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND APPROVING BYLAWS was duly introduced for the consideration of said City Council and read in fu11, It was then duly moved and seconded that said Resolution be adopted; and, after due discussion, said motion, carrying with it the adoption of said Resolution, prevailed and catirried by the following voter AYES, All members of said City Council shown present above voted "Aye", except NOES; ABSTENTIONS: 2, That a true, full and correct copy of the aforesaid Resolution adopted at the Meeting described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this Certificate; that said Resolution has been duly recorded in said City Council Is minutes of said Meeting,; that the above and foregoing paragraph is a true, full and correct excerpt from A said City Council 'a minutes of said Meeting parta.tning to the adoption of said Resolution; that the persons named in the above and foregoing paragraph are the duly chosen, qualified, and actin? officers and members of said City Council as indicated theroin; and that each of the officers and members of said City Council was duly and sufficiently notified officially and personally, in ndvnnee, of the time, place, and purpose of the aforesaid Meeting and that said Resolution would be introduced and considered for adoption at said Meeting, and each of said officers and members consented, in advance, to the holding of said Meeting for such purpose; and that said Meeting was open to the public, and public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said Meeting was given, all as required by Vernon's Ann, Civ, Stat, Article 6252-17, SIGNED AND SEALED tho day of , 1984, City Secretary Mayor, City Council [SEAL] RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE CREATION OF A HEALTH FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; APPROVING ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND APPROVING BYLAWS WIEREAS, the City cf Denton, Texas (the "Sponsoring Entity") is a duly created municipal corporation of the State of Texas, and political subdivision of the State of Texas created and established under the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF DENTON,'TEXASI Section 1, That, the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity has found and determined, and hereby finds and determines, that it is in the public int,sreAt and to the benefit of its residents End the citizens of this state that a health facilities development corporation be created to promote and develop new, expanded, or improved health facilities in order to assist the maintenance of the public health and the public welfare, with such health facilities development corporation to be known as the "Denton Health Facilities Development Corporation," Section 2, That, the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity hereby approves the Articles of Incorporation And the Bylaws proposed to be used in organizing the health facilitloa development corporation, which are attached to this Resolution and made a part hereof for all purposes, and the initial directors named in said Articles of Incorpora- tion shall be deemed to have been appointed, and are hereby appointed, as the initial directors by the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity. Section 3, That, the public purpose of the Sponsoring Entity which the health facilities development corporation may further on behalf of the Sponsoring Entity is the acquiring, constructing, providing, improv- ing, financing, and refinancing of health facilities in order to assist the maintenance of the public health pursuant to the Health Facilities Development Act, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATIO44 OF DENTON HEALTH FACIi,TT'f.RS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THE STATE OF TEXAS t COUNTY OF DENTON WE, THE UNDERSIGNED natural persons, not less than three in number, each of whom is at least 18 years of age, and each of whom is a resident of Denton, Texas (the "Sponsoring Entity"), acting as incorporators of a nonprofit public health facilities development corporation (the "Corporation") under the "Health Facilities Development Act", with the approval of the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity, as evidenced by the Resolution attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes, do hereby adopt the following Articles of Incorporation for the Corporation: ARTICLE ONE The name of the Corporation IS "Denton Health Facilities Development Corporation", ARTICLE TWO The Corporation is a nonprofit public health facilities development corporation under the Health Facilities Development Act, ARTICLE THREE The period of duration of the Corporation is perpetual, ARTICLE FOUR The Corporation is organized exclusively for the purposes of benefiting and accomplishing public purposes of, and to act on behalf of, the Sponsoring Entity, and the specific purpose for which the Corporation is organized and may issue bonds on behalf of the Sponsoring Entity is to acquire, construct, provide, improve, Finance, and refinance health facilities to assist the maintenance of the public health pursuant to the Health Facilities Development Act. The Corporation is A. constituted authority and a public instrumentality within the meaning of the regulations of thb United States Treasury Department and the rulinga of the Internal Revenue Service prescribed and promulgated pursuant to Section 103 of the 'intornal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the Corporation is authorized to act on beaalf of the Sponsoring Entity as provided in these Articles of Incorporation, However, the Corporation is not a political subdivision or political corporation of the State of Texas within the meaning of its constitution and laws, including without limitation Article III, Section 52 of said constitution, and nn agreements, bonds, debts or obligations of the Corporation are or shall ever he deemed to be the ngreements, bonds, debts or obligations, or the lending of credit, or a grant of public money or thing of value, of or by the Sponsoring Entity, or any other political corporation, subdivision or agency of the State of Texas, or a pledge of the faith and credit of any of them, ARTICLE FIVE The Corporation has no members And is a nonstock corporation, ARTICLE SIX These Articles of. Incorporation ntay at any time and from time to time be amended as provided in the Health Facilities Development Act if the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity by appropriate resolution finds and determines that such amendment is advisable and authorizes or directs that such amendment be made. 2 ARTICLE SEVEN The street address of the initial registered office of the Corporation to 215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas, and the name of its initial registered agent at such address is John McGrane. ARTICLE EIGHT The affairs of the Corporation shall be mnnagod by a board of directors which shall be composed in Ito entirety of persons appointed by the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity. The number of directors constituting the initial board of directors is three, The names and street addresses of the persons who are to serve as the initial directors and tho dates of expiration of their initial terms as directors, are as followat DATE OF EXPIRATION OF NAMES ADDRESSES TERM G. Chris Hartung 2217 Woodbrook December 11 1986 Denton, Texas 76201 Rick Svehla 2304 Groen Onks December 1, 1986 Denton, :texas 76201 John McGrana 3640 Wessex December 1, 1986 Denton, Texas 76205 Each director, including the initial directors, shall be eligible for reappointment. Directors are removable by the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity for cause or at will, and must not be appointed for a term in excess of six years. The directors shall serve as such without compensation except that they shall be reimbursed for their actual expenses incurred in the performance of their duties as directors. Any vacancy occurring on the board of directors through death, resignation 3 or otherwise shall be filled by appointment by the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity to hold office until the expiration of the term, ARTICLE NINE The name and street address of each incorporator prat NAME ADDRESS G, Chris Hartung 2217 Woodbrook Denton, Texas 76201 Rick Svehln 2304 Green Oaks Denton, Texas 76201 John McCrane 3640 Wessex Denton, Texas 76205 ARTICLE TEN The address of the Sponsoring Entity is 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, Texas 76201, The Sponsoring Entity has by resolution specifically authorized the Corporation to act on its behalf to 'urther the public purposes set forth in these Articles of Incorporation and has approved these Articles of Incorporation, A copy of said resolution is Attnched to these Articles of. Incorporation and made it part hereof for all purposes, ARTICLE ELEVEN No dividends shall ever be paid by the Corporation and no part of its net earnings remaining after payment of, its expenses shall be distributed to or inure to the benefit of its directors or officers or any individual, firm, corporation or association, except that in the event the board of directors shall dpterenine that sufficient provision has been made for the full payment of the expenses, bonds and other obligations of the Corporation, then any net earnings of the Corporation thereafter Accruing shall be paid to the Sponsoring Entity, No part of the Corporation's activities shall be carrying on propaganda, or 4 otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and it shall not participate in, or intervene in, (including the publishing or distributing of atatements), any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidnte for public office, ARTTCLE TWELVE If the Corporation ever should be dissolved when it tins, or is entitled to, any interest in any funds ,r property of any kind, real, personal or mixed, such funds or property or rights thereto shall not be transferred to private ownership, but shall be transferred and delivered to the Spcnsoring Entity after satisfaction or provision for satisfaction of debts and claims. TNCORPORATORS 5 DENTON HEALTH FACILITIES DEVF.LOPMPNT CORPORATION BYLA14S ARTICLE T OFFICES SECTION 1,01. The principal office of the Denton Health Facilities Development Corporation (the "Corporation") shall be at Denton, Texas, ARTICLE II DIRECTORS SECTION i'.01. The affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by a board of directors of not less than three persons (the "Board") which sha11 be composed in its entirety of persons appointed by, and whose terms of office shall be fixed by, the governing body of Denton, Texas (the "Sponsoring Entity"), No Director may be appointed for a term in excess of six years, SECTION 2,02, Vacancies in the Board, including vacancies to be filled by reason of an increase in the number of directors, shall be filled for the unexpired term by the appointment of successor directors by the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity, SECTION 2,03, The property and business of the Corporation shall be managed by the Board which may exercise all powers of the Corporation and do all lawful acts, SECTION 2.04. The annual meeting of the Board shall be held at the principal off.ic;e of the corporation on the lat Monday of December of each year, if not a legal holiday, and if a legal holiday, then at the next business day following, at 100 o'clock, p,m „ or at such time and place as shall be fixed by the consent in writing of all of the directors. All other meetings may be held at the place selected by the Board within the boundaries of the State of Texas, SECTION 2.05. Regular meetings, other than the annual meeting, may be held without notice at such time as shall from time to time he determined by resolution of the Board. SECTION 2.06. Special meetings of the hoar may be called by the President on three days' notice to each director, either personally or by mail or by telegram; special meetings shall be called by the President or Secretary in like manner on like notices on the written request of two directors. SECTION 2, 07, At all meetings of the Board the presence of a majority of the directors shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business and the act of a majority of the "directors present at any meeting at which there is a quorum shall be the act of the Ponrd, except as may be otherwise specifialilly provided by these Bylaws, If a quorum shall not be present at any nesting of the directors, th- directors present there at may recess the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until a quorum shall be present. SECTION 2,08, A meeting of the Board can be held at Any time without notice upon the execution by all directors of a written waiver of notice, And likewise may be held without notice when all of the directors are present at the muting, SECTION 2.09. Any action required by the Ilea Ith Facilities Development Act to be token at a meeting of the Board or any notion which may be taken at a meeting of the Board may be taken without a meeting if a consent in writing, setting forth the action to ba taken, shall be signed by All of the directors. Such consent shall have the same force and effect as a unanimous vote and may be stated as such in any Articles or document filed with the Secretary of State under the Health Facilities Development Act, SECTION 2.10. All meetings of the Board shall be held within the StAtE of Texas. SECTION 2.11. Each director may resi.lu or be removed by the governing body of the Sponsoring Entity for cause or at will, COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS SECTION 2.12. Directors, as such, shall receive no compensation for services rendered as directors, but shall be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred in performing their duties as directors. SECTION 2.13, The board may, by resolution or resolutions adopted by a majority of the whole Board, establish one or more committees, each committAA to consist of two or more of the directors of the Corporation. Such committee or committees shAll have such name or names, And such powers, As may be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board of. Directors, SECTION 2.14, committees shall keep regular minutes of their proceedings and report the same to the Board when required, ARTICLE III NOTICES SECTION 3.01. Whenever under the provisions of the statutes or these Bylaws, notice is required to be given to Any director, it shall not be construed to require personal notice, bV.t such notice may be given alternatively in writing, by MAO, addressed to such director At such address as appears on the books of the Corporation, and such notice shall be deemed to be given at the time. when the same shall be thus mailed, 2 SECTION 3,02, Whenever any notice is required to be Riven under the provisions of the statutes or of these Bylaws, a waiver thereof in writing signed by the person or persons entitled to said notice, whether before or after the time stated therein, shall be deemed equivalent thereto. Attendance of a director at n meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except where it director attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business on the ground that the meeting is not lawfully called or convened, ARTICLE IV OFFICERS SECTION 4,01, The officers of the Corporation shall be chosen by the Board, The Board shall choose from its members a President and a Vice President. The Board shall also choose a Secretary and a Treasurer who may or may not be members of, the Board. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person, except th.e offices of President and Secretary, SECTION 4.02. The Board shall choose such officers at its first meeting and at each annual meeting thereafter in odd number years, SECTION 4,03. The officers of the Corporation chosen pursuant to Section 4.02 shall serve until the next annual-6meeting of the Board in an odd number year or until their successors are chosen and qualify in their stead. SECTION 4.04. The Board may appoint such other officers and agents as it shall deem necessary, who shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be determined from time to time by the Board, SECTION 4.05. Any officer elected or appointed by the Board may be removed at any time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the whole Board, If the office of any officer becomes vacant for any reason, the vacancy shall be filled by the Board, The President SECTION 4.06, The President shall preside at all meetings of the directors. SECTION 4. 07, The President shall be exofficio a member of all standing committees, shall have general supervision of the management of the business of the Corporation, and shall see that all orders and resolutions of the Board are carried into effect. SECTION 4.08. The President shall execute bonds, mortgages and other contracts requiring a seal, under the seal of the Corporation, exck.pt;where required or permitted by law to be otherwise signed and executed and except where the signing and execution thereof shall be 3 expressly delegated by the Board to some other officer or agent of the Corporation, Vine President SECTION 4,09, The Vice President shall, in the absence or disability of the President, perform the duties and exercise the powers of the President, and shall perform such other duties as the Board shall prescribe, The Secretary SECTION 4.10. The Secretary shall attend all sessions of the Bonrd and record all votes and the minutes of all proceedings in a book to be kept for that purpose and shall perform like duties for the standing committees when required. He shall give, or cause to be given, notice of all special meetings of the Board and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board or the President, under whose supervision he shall be. He shall keep in safe custody the seal of the Corporation and, when authorized by the Board, affix the same to any instrument requiring it, and, when so affixed, it shall be attested by his signature. And when the corporate seat is required as to instruments executed in the course of ordinary business he shall attest to the signature of the President or Vice President and shall affix the sonl thereto. The Treasurer SECTION 4.11. To the extent not otherwise provided by the Board, by rules or regulations, in resolutions relating to the issuance of bonds, or in any financing documents relating to such issuance, the Treasurer shall have the custody of the corporate funds and securities and shall keep full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in books belonging to the Corporation and shall deposit all moneys and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the Corporation in a depository as shall be designated by the Board, He shall disburse the funds of the Corporation as may be ordered by the Board, taking proper vouchers for such disbursements, and shall render to the President and directors, at the regular meetings of the Bonrd, or whenever they may require it, an account of all his transactions as Treasurer and of the financial condition of the Corporation. SECTION 4.12, The Board may require the President, Vice President, tha Secretary, and the Treasurer to give the Corporation bonds in such sums and with such surety or sureties as shall be satisfactory to the Board for the faithful performance of the duties of their office and for the restoration to the Corporation, in case of his death, resignation, retirement or'removal from office, of all books, papers, vouchers, money and other property of whatever kind in his possession or under his control belonging to the Corporation, SECTION 4,13. The provisions of the Texas Uniform Facsimile Signature of Public Officials Act shall be applicable to the 4 Corporation, which is a duly constituted authority of the Sponsoring Entity, a political subdivision of the Stito (if Taxaa, ARTICLE V FISCA14 PROVISIONS SECTION 5.01. No dividends shall ever be paid by the Corporation and no part of its net earnings retraining after payment of its expenses nhall be distributed to or inure to the benefit of its directors or officers or any individual, firm, corporation, or association, except that in the event the board of directors shall detf~rmine that sufficient provision bas been made for the full payment of the expenses, bonds, and other obligations of the Corporation, then any not earnings of the Corporation thereafter accruing shall be paid to the Sponsoring Entity. No part of the Corporation's activities shall be carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and it shall not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. SECTION 5.02. The Board shall have prepared for each annual meeting a full and clear statement of the business and condition of the Corporation, Checks SECTION 5.03. All checks or demands for money and notes of the Corporation shall be signed by such officer or officers or such other person or persons as the Board may from time to time designate, provided that in no event shall a check be negotiable until it is signed by at least one officer, riseal Year SECTION 5.04. The fiscal year shall be determined by resolution of the Board. ARTICLE VI SEAL SECTION 6,01, The corporate seal shall be circular and shall have inscribed in the outer circle "Denton lleatth Facilities Development Corporation" and shall have inscribed in the inner circle the letters "T-E-X-A-S" and a five pointed stet. Said seal may be used by causing, it or a facsimile thereof to be fn)ireased or affixed or reproduced or otherwise, The imprint of this seal thus authorized is affixed opposite to this section. The affixing of the corporate seal to any document or other corporate instrument shall not be required except to the extent provided otherwise by applicable law. 5 ARTICLE VI? MSFNDMENTS SECTION 7,01, Those Bylaws may be altored, changed, or amended at any meeting of the Hoard at which a quorum is present, provided notice of tho proposed alteration, change, or amendment be contained in tho notice of such meeting, by the aff.',rmati.ve vote of n majority of the directors present at such meeting, 'All amendments to, substitutes for, and regeala of, these Bvlnwe shall be subject to the approval of the govarnl.ng body of the Sponsoring Entity, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this tho dny of , of 1984. President 6 CITY CUUNCIL AGFNUA BACK-UP SUMMARY. SHLL'i' M E"I'lNG UNTUt November 20, 1984 8UBJECTs Uispe-siLiota of excess Henry Street (8herman :drive) right-ot-way (D-37) SUMMARY: Disposition of approximately 1,942,5 square feet of excess Henry :street (Sherman Drive) right-ot- way has been requested by Mr. 'Pommy Caruthers. The right-of-way in question is located adjacent ana west of Denison Street and aujacent and north of Henry Street (Sherman Drive), The Development Review Committee has reviewed the disposition request and anticipates no future public need for the property. No utility lines or public facilities are in place at the subject site. ACTION !HQUYREDs Approval or denial of disposition request RECOMMENDATION: 'The Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mends disposition of the excess Henry Street right-of-way. AL`!'LlINA'i'1VRS s Approval or denial of disposition request A'T'TAC:HMEN'i'S s 1. Reduced map 2. Uevelopment Review Committee minutes of Play 8, 1984 3. Planning ana Coning Commission minutes of May 30, 1984 David B11ison Senior Plannor ( r,6ns:rrl, t ant{11s>a sutt~ ,,T~~G, 1 ~.{ALL rr~. 111 r„~tr w 0w, 4n6 4,tOIIO, tht kl„vn: Cf ptoPnY Io L411C rt f ?~T:• •lut l Tu,L tV!f e 1a t i,Vtlc.\'u,. .ielr,': s;^6-. r~• ~•e..___~._.«.... T_. _.._r.- !.4:IU?. : L L. I II: r~.ta bl ~ r w--. i • I 1 1 .tl t i U..w 1.\ ~ Ir,~st I i OU p / fr 04, , 1, r~• -`-Lan f 1 Minu C 4'i Development Roviliw committee May at 1064 DRC Members Present, Jackie Doyle, David Ellison, Tommy Stone, Robert Hagemann, Tary,on Paster, Pablo Rubio, Ernie Tullos, David Ham, and Randall Schmitt VI. Review of Henry street Disposition Request A. Engineering Recommend disposition. B. Water and Sewer Put City land up for public bid. Otherwise no comment. C. Electric Electric Department has no use for right-of-way. D. Building Inspection No comment. E. Transportation Engineering No representative from this department was present. F. Fire No problem. G. Parks and Recreation No representative from this department was present. H. Lone Star Gas No comment. I. G.T.E. No representative from this department was present. J. Cox Cable No representative from this department was present, K. Planning and Community Development Recommend disposition if there is no anticipated public need. 0010a i P $ z Minutes May SQ 1984 Page Nine On question from Mr, Claiborne, Mr, Watkins explained the sign ordinance, set backs and restrictions, tie requested that a historical sign not be restricted to this ordinance. He stated in a survey done in 1981, 8 out of 15 Texas communities surveyed, prohibited port- able signs. He stated the ordinance is basically con- servative, Mr, Juren stated as sophisticated a town as Denton is, we need an ordinance, Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend the pproposed sign ordinance to the City Council, Seconded by Mr, Sidor and unanimously carried (6-0). B. [and nsider disposition of excess Henry Street (Sherman ive) right-of-way (D-37), , Ellison stated this is the disposition of approxi- tely 1,942,S square feet of excess Henry Street (Sher- n Drive) right-of-way and has been requested by Mr, my Caruthers, The right-of-way in question is lo- ted ad)acent and west of Denison Street and adjacent nort of Henry Street (Sherman Drive). He stated Development Review Committee has reviewed the position request and anticipates no future public need for the property. He added no utility lines or facilities public are in place subject of the excess right-of-way. On question from Mr. Sidor, Mr. Ellison stated the pro perty will be appraised to determine the cost of the sale. Mr. Juren made a motion to recommend approval of the disposition of the excess right-of-way of Henry Street (Sherman Drive), Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (6-0), C. Approval of the preliminary replat of lots 1 and 2 of the Adkisson Addition (Denton County Jail), Ayub Sandhu of Goodson Engineers, stated there has been some question about complying with the subdivision regu- lations regarding access on Woodrow Lane. He stated he feels they should have no trouble In making revisions to comply with City standards. Judge Cole stated he felt the need for two access points on 'Woodrow Lane. He stated it is not known how many vehicles will be there at one time and stated he feels the need for ample access in case of an emergency and CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BACK--UP SUMMARY §HEET. MEETING DATE: November 20, 1984 SUBJECT: Approve disposition of City property located northeast corner of Bonnie Brae and Scripture Streets, (D-38) SUMMARY: This Is a tract of approximately 0,223 acres situated east of Bonnie Brae and north of Scripture. The site Is part of a larger portion of land acquired as right-of-way for Bonnie Brea development and It Is zoned agricultural (A). Immediately south of this tract is a single family lot (SF-10) occupied by an existing single family house, Mr. Cuch)a has development Interests In this site and he is proposing to use the existing house for a day care center, He Is also proposing to purchase the adjacent (north) tract owned by the City to be used for recreational purposes. Bonnie Brae has been designated a primary major arterial and It requires 120 feet of right-of-way (50 feet from center line), The existing Bonnie Brae Street has a right-of-way of 50 feet but It Is recommended that the additional rIght-of -way be held for the ultimate long term development of Bonnie Brae. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF THE SITE The site Is currently zoned agricultural (A) and It Is far too small to be properly utilized for agricultural purposes. Even so, If the use of this site is changed to residential, It's triangular shape and dimensions (87' X 112' X 1251) will severely restrict any kind of building development with the usual set backs to satisfy the minimum requirements. ACTION REQUIRED: Approval or denial of the property for disposition RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commisslon considered this Item at its meeting of October 24, 1984 and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the property for disposition, City Council Summary Page 2 ALTERNATIVES: I. Retain the property 2. Table for future consideration ATTACHMENTS; 1, location map 2, Site plan showing total right-ot-way 3. Site plan showing retention of 60 feet right.-of-way 4. Site plan showing 120 feet right-of-way 5. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes Harry Nn Persaud Develop nt Review Planner 08498 ~e!'- i ise x~ i N), W X4029 W Property disposition 2 3 C7 m 4 e W KENNA PARK Lf 1.1 I i O.Sf ~ ~22I6' „ it.l3' !!b0' i29 0 tot !!6 SCRIPTURE 2 j ~a ~!`oi3'_.- inn - nt s U7,2 6 2 3 7 4 ~ W _ t 'x ,R W R.O. \ ~ 7oto1 ~~l'sf~J 1 1J •fY • I r~• 1 \ Retenti#o o~ A.0,W, a4etooft (vt '15r I \ 3MtY (d sJ+srf rM •f leti•l nress r•~vl,) . .I 1 1 j'gf1'M~ ~ ~ S t J rl~ N ` MI \ 1 ' I ply.. ~_.S ...1y . _ ~I r, N,, ~citnfi~» of Ixo of R.O.w. (Lo (iem ccrrkAAluo e cot, street) . Q !1. 1~ e I r ~ ~ RKinLlt![i 4c?plsr 24 f 1984 V. Considerations Recommend approval of disposition of city property located at the northeast corner of Bonnie Brae and scripture Streets Mr, Persaud stated this is a tract of approximately 04223 acres situated east of Bonnie Brae and north of Soript+are. The site is part of a larger portion of land acquired as right-of-way for Bonnie Bras development and it is zonod agricultural (A), He stated immediately south of this tract is a single family lot (SF-10) occupied by an ex- isting sin le family house. Mr. Cuohia has development interests in this site and he is proposing to use the xisting house for a day care center, He is also pro- osing to purchase the adjacent (north) tract owned by the city to be used for recreational purposes. Bonnie Brae has been designated a primary major arterial and it requires 120 feet of right-of-way (60'feet from center line). The existing Bonnie Brae Street has a right-of- way of 60 feet but it is reoommended that the additional right-of-way be held for the ultimate long term develop- ment of Bonnie Brae, He further stated the lot Is far too small to be properly utilized for agricultural purposes. He also stated if the use of this site is changed to residential, its triangular shape and dimensions will severely restrict any kind of building development with the usual set- backs to satisfy the minimum requirements. He added the Development Review Committee anticipates no future public use for this site and recommends disposition. Dr, John Cuehia stated he is proposing a day care center on the property south of the tract he is wishing to purchase from the city. He stated the state laws re- garding a day care center require eight (81) feet of outside space per child and he would like to purchase this tract for recreational purposes. He showed slides and pictures of the lot to purchase as well as the surrounding area, He stated he would be dedicating additional land for right-of-way at some future date and would be willing to do that even though it would out down considerably the size of the lot. Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of the disposition of city propertyllocated at the northeast corner of Bonnie-Brae and Scripture Streets. Seconded by Mr. Sidor and unanimously carried (5-0). CMYof DENT0N, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 M H M 0 R A N D U M TO; Chris Hartung, City Manager PROM; Rick Svohla, Assistant City Manager DATB. November 14, 19811 5UBJFG1': Additional Information on Bond Issue At the Council's meeting on October 30, 1984, some additional information was furnished to Council. At that time they asked tot, additional information, They asked what the total cost of repaving and rebuilding all of the streets within tur City of Denton would be, We indicated to the Council that there are at least 45 reties of streets to be overlayed or ropaved and at least l5 males of streets to be rebuilt. Assuming tliat those mileages as the winimum in each category, the cost for overlaying would be approximately $31000,000 and the cost for rebuilding would be approximately $16,000,000, Titis would make Lite total bond package for maintenance only approximately $19,000000. in adclitie,a to that the Council also talked about adding otoer projects that would ex panel facilities to help reduce tiie amount of congestion within the city, Some of those mentioned are listed below along with the cost. 1. Audra Lane from University to Mirlgo, $225,000. 2. Audra Lane from Paisley to Charlos Street, $160,000. 3, Lillian B. Millet' the second two lanes, $500,000. 4. Teasley from Dally; Drive to Lillian B, Miller, adding; two lanes, $1,250,000. S, Willowwoocl from 4' ghland Park Road to McCormick Street, $275,000. 6. llignland park Road from 4'Iillowwood to Underwood, $375,000. 7. Windsor from Hinkle to Bonate Brae, $425 000. 8. Bonnie Brae, Windsor, to Ul►ivorsity, $W0 000, r I Adciiliolsal lnformatioii on Buuci ls5Ue 140ve111 b0r l41 , 1984 Page L '1 As Johis McGranu indic:c,tea to tfio Council at the Uctuour A 1984 mouting, tlit) re is it way thxt the Gity could finance $10,000,000 wortii of itnproveuleiits laitilout ilicreasinl; taxes. However, ii L110 COLUICiI sais4ies to include more milintenance projects and/or souse expansion projects, taxes will wive to ue levied I,o finance the additional cost. John McGrane ilas indicated that iur oach million dol tars in additional improvolnQnts, taxes will have to be raised approximately emits pair isurldreci dollars of tlssossed valuation, 1f the niiieteen million 6ullar maintenance program is to be considered turn taxes will nave to uu raised approximately 18 cents. John and 1 will both be it tale 110etin4 to discuss Stour uptions Clint the Council might used illYormiltiou on or to give theta utisei. figures if different si.e programs and other projects are to lie considere(l. ~i1ci. v7cin it _-JJ_Jy A.`isist.lilt city Man'lf;ei' )i 19 5i ;1 \f III t OWYOf fitN TRXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DEN Tom TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 Office of the City Manager NICNIORANDUM T0; G. Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager DATE. November 15, 1984 SUBJECT, Street Bond Election In the City Council's recent discussion on the street bond election, the possibility of using an advertising firm to pproniote tree election" and handle the public relations was iscussed. The City Council naa asked for further information about this possibility and cost figures, 1 have attached a report of a survey done witn a number of area cities, and also a proposal from Day Communications. The proposed cost for the City of Dentou's program would be in the area of $23,000. Please let me know if you need additional information on this, Bet y IcK n Assistant City Manager lj Attachments 2004M r' CI i4 D/'NMN,!rjrXAi MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) $668200 M H M 0 R A N D U M TOi Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager FROM: Vic Boyer, Administrative Assistant DATE; November 9, 1984 SUBJECT; Consul"cant for Advertising Campaign for Street Bond Election As per Chris Hartung's_request, Jim Glenn and I have been surveying Texas cities to research methods used to promote public acceptance of street bonds, So far, we have talked with finance officers in fifteen cities, Of the cities we surveyed, all nave used private citizen groups (usually highly-respected community leaders) to promote the bonds, In all cases, funding for advertising was provided by private individuals or urganizations, In tntee instances (Arlighton, Grand Prairie, and Uarland) an advertising consultant - Sissy Day's Communication Associates - was hired by the local citizen's committee to provide professional expertise. I have talked with Sissy Day, and she informs me ,that her advertising and consulting services include slide snows, phone banks, mailing materials, radio and television commercials, and the like. Cost ranges from $18,000 to $3S,000 depending on services requested and the population of the city. She said that $23,000 would be a figure typical of cities witn population the size of Denton's. Please let me know if you need any further information on this. Vic Boyer, am n stra ve s stars Ji 1989M AGNMOY PRO1►TLL► Day Communications & Associates is a lull-service public relations agenoy, specializing in business, community and political relations, The firm has a long history of aiding companies, institutions and governmental entities through communications. Sissy Day, president, has been credited with the success of hundreds of local, state and national campaigns, including a number of individual candidate campaigns and numerous bond and referendum elections, Through Not Day's many campaigns, the firm has acquired an extensive "library" of contacts with state senators and representatives, as well as elected officials and community leaders throughout the Metroplex, The Day firm offers a unique oombination, in that while our main base of operation is in Dallas, we have an associate office in Austin whose staff has both legal and legislative experience, The firm offers broad-based experience in lobbying, consulting, drafting of bills, zoning and campaign management, Our firm's foremost specialty is coordinating relations between the community, corporations and elected officials, Our public relations campaigns include direct mail production, data processing, graphics development, telephone and market research and special events coordination, The firm has had diverse experience in handling challenging and sometimes extremely complex assignments for both individuals and bipartisan groups, DAY COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATES 2001 McKinney Aw„ SO# 330, DUI", YoKa 76201 (214) 742,9717 M CLIENT LISTING CURRENT CLIENTS D,A.R,T, - Campaign management for defeat of recall election in the cities of Carrollton and Farmers Branch. City of Grand Prairie - Consulting for December, 1984 bond I' election. ' BONDS AND REFERENDUMS Garland Bond Election - Complete campaign management for October 13, 1984 election, Passed $68.1M of 92,53M package. Addison C.A.R.E,S. - Airport Board Referendum. campaign management for group opposed to elected Airport Board. Successful. ' Collin County Bond - Campaign managements passed $60M of $86.15M package. Carrollton Buffer-Zone Ordinance - Campaign management. I Addison Bond, 1981 - Managed entire campaign, including phone bank. All of the $28.2M package passed, all by 87% or more of the votes cast, I Garland Bond, 1981 - Managed entire campaign, including phone bank. All of the $43.7M package passed, all by 68% and up to 81% of the votes cast, Grand Prairie Bond, 1981 - Managed entire campaign, including phone bank. Of the $35.8M package, $25.1M passed. Of seven propositions, four passed with 82% or more of the votes cast. DAY COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATES 2001 MOKInney Av4„ Sulte 330, 041W, T4KU 76201(214)742-2717 r; t t L, t1~0 w erd entirM o igat inoladinp phone busk. of of the • voles s oast, Osaka" N476. bM p44sQd Wlth bat and up to 70% or more ' Police and rite Referendum 1979 -.Managed oampeign for the oat Dallas COU_nav V' 1977 - Public relations and media servloes, ° Passed, Mucruite Cabe TV R ft±2A u + ' 1990 - phone bank t passed, Carter Count r -Oae Pari-Mut++•1 njuat j entire o"P419n; successful, March 1983 - Managed garter County, Oklahoma Pari Retrr•n.~++. entire camps gn; et~aoesaful, o December 1983 - Managed zoxING FRACORP, 1983 - Public relations; suoceusful, *ederatsd Deea}xtment_~ t0ress 1981 - Phone bank a;nd direct mail in Carrolltoni successful, Addl M zoning, 1980 - Public relations; successful, Wlch4ta Falls Zonina, 1980 - Public relations . successful, Plano Zonina, 1980 - Presentation and polling, successful, OV8RNMENTAL ENTxTrES AND ORGA Yz NS J City _o! garland 1981 Monitoring legislation, I Mort Worth Chamber ef+ Commerce Political Action Committee Seminar, Dallas Chamber o! Commerce Political ActioCommittee Seminar Or-eat Southwest ----cation Set Up PAC and maintaln books,, illas Deaor-,•••.+.• Torus + Public relations. and msnagemMnt. I Callas do +n v Deaooratia p,.«*~ Public relations, Pu lle re otions and consulting to transportation. City Pubrations aad consulting to transportation. City of Plana. Public relations and consulting to transportation, Collin County 0„oamiip,112 sr_ s court Public relations and consulting to transportation, • Cosplsts Olisnt listing available on rsqusst I I