HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-18-1984
CITE COUNCIL
AGENDA
I~-18-84
AQ4NDA
i l'Y of 'DOWN 01'f X COUNCIL
December lb. 1984
WorK session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
December 18 , too Municipal lBui~lding 5at 0 wn~ic~h in hfollowing ipeitems gill be
conaideredo
5,30 p.m.
i, Report on activitles of Denton Sesquieenteonlal
6ommf, t tee ,
Discussion of the Fire Department reorganization wand
posit.ion title changes in the Po 4ice and Fire
epartments,
J. Discussion of the vacation/bonus pay policy,
4. Discussion of proposed expansion of the Capelcorn
Mob1.1e Home Park for t n a purpose of seter(nining
woetner to begin the annexation process,
5. Approval of proposed sign ordinance provisions.
0, EXeCUtiVe Session,
A. Legal Matters Under Sec, zke), Art, 62'2-i7
V, ,1'.5.
A
B. Reai Estate Under Sec, 'L(f), Art. 0252-17
V.A.i.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art o252-17 V.A.T.S,
D, board Appointments Under Sec, 2(g), Art
625z-17 V,A.i'.S,
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on 'T'uesday,
December 18, 1984, at 7:00 p,m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal guilaing at which the following items will be
considered:
00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of a Resolution in Memory of C. J.
Taylor, Jr.
Z. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of September 18, 19,34 and the Special Called
Meeting of September 25, 1984.
Consent Agenda;
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will oe strictly on the oasis of the
Stsfr recommendations, Approval of the Consent 'Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implewent each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
December 16,,1984
Page Two
A. Bids and Purchase Orders,
Listed ue).ow are olds and an agreement to be approved for
payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
7,A, and 7,B). fhis listing Is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Memoers to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance.
1, Bid M ysbb - Po.ice sedans and sedans
z, aid N 9.so7 - Pickups and vans
3, did # vj70 - Lease/purchase of motor pool
equipment
4. bid , j37t - 18m disk drive
5. Bid 9373 - Loss test set
u, did )3]4 - free trimming and
miscellaneous electrical lines
B. Agreements;
I. Approval of an agreement to rovide certain
program services on tae UM ity Billing
System and Payroll-Personnel System during
fiscal year 196,4-85 between the City and
fres Systems, inc,
U. Plats, deplats, and Site Plans;
1, Approval of amendment of site plan of an
approved specific use permit on an
approximately 39.31's acre tract of land
located along the east side of Mayhill Road
(S-L65), (Tne Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
1. Approval of preliminary plat of the Garner
Addition, Block 1, Lot 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commissioa recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary plat of the Smith
Hill Addition. (i'ne Plaanin and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary replat of the
Veteran's Addition, Lots 4A and, 48, ('ir.e
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
v
City of s)entoit l;ity Council Agenda
ileceMber 18, 1984
Page fnrea
5. Approval ox preliminary plat of Westgate
Part;, Hirst Addition, dock G, Lot 5. (Cho
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
n, Approval of preliminary plat of 'The
Woodlanas and Oaks of rownship ii Addition-
(the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
4. Presentation to the City Council of resolutions
approved by the Sam Houston Elementary School Parent-
'reacoers Association,
5 Presentation of a petition to the City council by Mr,
Jim Goulet regarding the saving of cress,
b. Public bearings;
A. void a public nearing on the petition of B. L.
Arener for annexation of 31.0ZI acres located at
the southwest corner of Ryan Road and laasley
Uane kriAZI81.) kA-8). (lne Manning and Zoning
~;ommissioa recommends approval,)
B. Bold a public nearing regarding the proposed
annexation of approximately 5 acres of land
located north or Highway 380 West and adjacent
and west of Hascn Branch Road (A-9), (Yhe
Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval,)
C, Hold a public hearing on the petition of Xyers
Development Corporation for annexation of
approximately 131.1 acres located south of
Zonxnf CoNowiln mmissionadrecomme0nds
i~i~hensPlannig and east
approval,)
0. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Walter
DeRonde for annexation of approximately 112 acres
located west of 1-35E service road and north of
:Marshall toad and east of the iopeKa and Santa Fe
&ailway (A-.12). ll'ne Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
1. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and awarding a contract for tine
purchase of materials, equipment, pupplies or
services; providing for the expenditure of funds
toeretore; and providing for an effective date.
City of Denton Gity Council Agenda
December 18, 1964
Page four
B, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement to provide certain program services on
the Utility Billing System and Payroll-Personnel
System during fiscal year 1984;.85 between the
6ity and Tres Systems, Inc,
C, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the
sale of 0,144 acres of real property as described
herein; authorizing the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents transferring title, (D-35)
D. Consider adoption or an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district to the planned development. (PO) district
on an approximately 17,1 acre parcel located at
the soutnwest corner of Paige and Swisher Roada,
(4-1094)
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning trom the agricuiturai (A)
district to the planoad development (PO) alsteict
on a 49,4 acre tract located on toe nortn side of
Shady Snores Road approximately Z50 feet west of
Swisher Road. (4-lb95)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the
expenditure of funds by the City of Denton for
hosting a ouainess meeting and Lianquet for the
texas Municipal League, Region 8,
u. Resolutions,
A. Consider approval of a resolution to amend the
vacation/bonus time policy.
8. Consider approval of a resolution postponing the
regular Council meeting of January 1 to January
8) 1985,
y, Receive the Comprenensive Annual Financial Report by
Arthur Andersen and Company.
10. Consider approval of closing the Wye-Robertson
railroad crossing. ('The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
11. 01ficial Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
8. Real Estate
C. Personnel
0. Board Appointments
1
Y y
City of Denton City Council. Agenda
Decemper 18, .1984
Page Five
11, New Business:
this item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agandas.
C 9 R E I F i , A I E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin hoard-at tae City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1984 at l/ 1 O'CLock
{a.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
r
1597C
AGENDA
CI1'Y, OF 'DEN'T'ON CITY COUNCIL
December 18, 1984
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
December 18, 1984, at 5:30 p,m, in the "ivil Defense Room of
the Municipal Building at which the following items gill be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
11 Report on activities of Denton Sesqutcentennial
Committee.
L, Discussion of the Fire Departmen( reorganization and
position title changes in the Police and Fire
Departments.
3, Discussion of the vacation/bonus pay policy,
4. Discussion of proposed expansion of the Capricorn
Mobile dome Park for the purpose of determining
whether to begin the annexation process,
5. Approval of proposed sign ordinance provisions.
6. Executive Session:
A. Legal. Matters Under See. lke), Art. 6252-17
V„ T,S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2l f), Art. 6252-17
V.A,I.b.
C. Personnel Under Sec, 2(g), Art 6251-17 V.A.'T,S,
D, Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6292-1.7 V.A.1'.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on 'Tuesday,
December 18, 19840 at 7;00 p,m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 P.M.
1. Consider approval of a Resolution in Memory of C,' J.
'T'aylor, Jr.
Z. Consider approval of the fflnutes of the Regular
Meeting of September 18, 1944 and the Special Called
Meeting of September 25, 1984.
3. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will oe strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
City of Donton City Council Agenda
December 18, 1984
Page Two
A. Bids and Purchase Orders;
Listed oelow are bids and an agreement to be approved for
paymont unuer the Ordinance section of the agenda, Detailed
Gback-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
7,A, and 7.B), rhls listing is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance,
1. Bid # 9scb - Police sedans and sedans
G, Bid # 930 - Pickups and vans
3, Bid # 9370 - Lease/purchase of motor pool
equipment
4. Bid # 9371 - IBM disk drive
5. Bid # 9373 - Loss test set
b. Bid # 9374 - 1'ree trimming and 1
miscellaneous electrical lines
b, Agreements:
Approval of an agreement to provide certain
program services on the Utility Billing
System and Payroll-Personnel System during
fiscal year 1964-85 between the City and
'Tres Systems, inc.
C, Plats, Replats, and Site Plans;
1, Approval of amendment of site plan of an
approved specific use permit on an
approximately 39,313 acre tract of land
located along the east side of Mayhill Road
(5-165). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
Z. Approval of preliminary plat of the Garner
Addition, Block 1, Lot 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
i
3. Approval of preliminary plat of the Smith
Hill Addition, (toe Plannin and Zoning
Commission recommends approvall.)
4. Approval of preliminary replat of the
Veteran's Addition, Lots 4A and 4B. ('the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
City at Benton 04ty Council. Agenda
December 18, 1984
Page 'Three
5. Approval of reliminary plat of West ate
Park, First` Addition, Block C, Lot 5. tPhe
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
6. Approval of preliminary plat of The
Woodlands and Oaks of Township iX Addition.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
4. Presentation to the City Council of resolutions
approved by the Sam Houston Clementary School Parent-
Teachers Association.
56 Presentation of a petition to the City Council by Mr.
Jim Goulet regarding the saving of trees,
6. Public Hearings;
A. Hold a public hearing on the etition of B. L.
Archer for annexation of 31.02f acres icioated at
the southwest corner of Ryan Road and :,asley
1,ane (FM'Z181) (A-8). ( i'he Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,.)
B. Hold a )ublic hearing regarding the proposed
annexation of approximately 5 acres of land
located north of Highway 380 West and adjacent
and west of Masco Branch Road (A-9). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval,)
C. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Myers
Development Corporation for annexation of
approximately 131.7 acres located south of
Robinson road and east of Nowlin Road (A-10).
(`fhe Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
D. Hold a public hearing on the petition of Walter
DeRonde for annexation of approximately 112 acres
located west of 1-35C service road and north of
oarshall Road and east of the l'opeka and Banta Fe J
Railway (A-12). he Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
1. Ordinances-,
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and awarding a contract for the
purchase of materials,' dquipment, supplies or
services; providing for the expenditure of funds
therefore; and providing for an effective date.
city of Denton City Council Agenda
December 18, 1984
Page Four
B, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement to provide certain program services on
the Utility Billing System and Payroll-Personnel
System during fiscal year 1984-85 between the
City and Tres Systems, Inc.
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the
sale of O,l4t acres of real property as described
nerein; authorizing the Mayor to execute the
necessary documents transferring title, (D-35)
D, Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district to toe planned development (PD) district
on an approximately 17,1 acre parcel located at
the southwest corner of Paige and Swisher Roads.
(z-1694)
S. Consider ado tion of an ordinance approving, f~
change in ~oning from the agricultural (A)
district to the planned development (PD) district
on a 49.4 acres tract located on the north side of
Shady Snores Road approximately 250 feet west of
Swisher Road, (Z-1695)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance autnorizing the
expendiLUre of funds by the City of Denton for
hosting a business meeting and banquet for the
Texas Municipal League, Region 8,
ti. ResoiuLionss
A. Consider approval of a resolution to amend the
vacation/bonus time policy.
B. Consider approval of a resolution postponing the
regular Council meeting of January 1 to January
8, 1985,
9. Receive the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report by
Arthur Andersen and Company. 4
10. Consider approval of closing the Wye-Robertson
railroad crossing, (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
11. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A, Legal Matters
13. Real Lstate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
Glty of Denton City Council Agenda
December 18, 1984
Page Five
12, New Business:
this item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agondas,
c E R 'r I F I C A r E
1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, 'T'exas,
on the day of 1984 at o'clock
(a.m.)
CI'T'Y SECRETARY
1597C
30
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
Dater December 12, 1984
Tot G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
From: Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner
Subject: Sesquicentennial Committee
As you know, 1986, the 150th birthdate of the State of Texas
is fast approaching. Recently, several members of the City
of Denton Sesquicentennial Committee attended the state leader-
ship conference in Austin. Committee members Were able to par-
ticipate in several sessions including legal issues, publicity,
marketing, fund raising, etc, Denton's committee is finalizing
plans for the celebration and would like to update the City
Council on these plans,
t~ti i
Denise Sp vey
DSiab
CITY OP DENTON
MEMORANDUM
ICI
DATEi December 18, 1,984
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM} David Ellison, Senior Planner
SUBaECTt DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CAPRICORN MOBILE
HOME PARK FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER TO
BEGIN THE ANNEXATION PROCESS
The existing Capricorn Mobile Home Park is situated on approxi-
mately 30 acres and consists of approximately 70 mobile home
sites, Holigan Development corporation (developers of Hickory
Creek Mobile Home Park) have submi;;ted a preliminary plat for
65 acres adjoining the existing park. The intent of the pre-
liminary plat is to achieve approval of a one lot subdivision
for the purposes of expanding the existing park so that there
are a total of approximately 600 units. Essentially, the
prospective developers are seeking approval of a 100 acre
mobile home park of which the existing park will reportedly be
Significantly improved. Compliance with the City of Denton
Mobile Home Park and Travel Trailer Ordinance has been pledged.
It has been indicated that the issue of annexation does not
have a significant bearing on development plans from the
owner's perspective, but annexation is the only way to insure
compliance with City Development Standards or control the use
t,.rough zoning,,
State law permits a home rule City, on its initiative, to annex
a total of 10% bf the current land area per year. The City is
approximately 42.5 square miles in size, so we do have the
authority to annex a 4.2 square mile area in 1985. This area
would not fall within the boundaries of a possible 2,000 acre
annexation which would take in property east and south of
existing city limits towards Lake Lewisville.
0 J
Mayor & Members of the City Council
December 18, 1984
Page 2
Many improvements required by the City of Denton Subdivision
Regulations (streets and utilities particularly) will be
required regardless of the outcome of the annexation question.
It is again, however, important to note that the City of Denton
Mobile Home Park and Travel 'Frailer ordinance requirements
cannot be required by law unless the property is annexed into
the City of Denton.
N L.
~nv~d~~ll~~on-"_____________
se
0553s
I
1.r I
l I I _j' i /~h'1!1!11 ~.1_iH I; MI!1 {Mn 1, !r ry r1 tll
WY
I .
NI MCI *II~I~N.tI \ • " / IN IC _ ~
III1N IN1 /1 MIIMMI \ \ 1 _ ` ~
1 `
1
. y
AI • • I1~ l
~1's 4 ~ M
1 I
1
I 1 : l
1 '
1
t
1• 1 lit
pill . 4.
s
P f
MAIT NO. 7 MIL 30, I984 50 1 3D
NO.
AN ORAINANC£ gg,E?EA1.IN0 THS EXISTING ARTICLE 17 AND OTHER PRO-
VISIONS 0.E4ATINo TO SIGNS AND RELNACTINO A NEW ARTICLE 17 OF
APP£KDIX d-ZONING OF THZ COU OF ORIIINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DZRTON TEXAS TO PIIOVI,Dk FOR THE REOV"TING OF SIGNS AND THE
PER; R+XNO THEREOF' PROVIDIK FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXC£ED TWO
HUNDRED DOLLARS (SiOO.00) FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF PROVIDING FOR
A S£VERADILITY CLAUSZ' REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
THEREOF; AND PROVIDINO hR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds that
the regulation of the site, location, height, use, maintenance,
construction and placement of signs and other outdoor advertising
devices and structures is necessary to pre4at impediments and
dangers to drivers and pedestrians upon and along City streets,
sidewalks and sasementa; and
WHEREAS, the City Council oI, thr, City of Denton finds that
,no- use of signs and other outdoor advertising devices and
structures, if unregulated, oan, because of chair number,
placement, and charecta risties, adversaly effect proparcy values;
aestnotieally damage the overall a°ivironmenc; craaca an
unfavorable business climate which hampers attempcs to attract
and retain desirable commercial and business enterprises; and
foster conditions that lessen the enjoyment and desirability of
the City of Denton as a place in which co visit, live and work;
and
wHEYE<1.;, the City Council of the City of Denton finds chat
portable or mobile signs present special craffic hazards when
t4Wed on public streets or displayed on or along public right-
of-ways; act as impediments cc the iCfectivene3s of the police
and fire departmencs in performing taaLr duties; present dangers
to the health, safety and general welfara of the citizens of the
C'-t7 of Dencon because of their mobility, chair propensity to be
blo.n about if not properly anchored, anu, is lignced, present
spec_al naaards of electrical use not -ound in other signs; and
WHEREAS, Texas Revised Civil Scatuce Article 1175 (2+)
specifically suumeratas as one -.)f cha pourers poss,►ssed by cne
PAGE 1
City of Denton is the authority to regulate, license and contvol
or prohibit the erection of signs and billboards;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HERESY ORDAINS:
SECT 1".
That Article 17 of Appendix S•Zoning of the Code of Ordi-
natsces of the City of Denton is hereby in all things repealed,
SECTION II,
That a new Article 17 of Appendix S•Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of tha City of Denton is hereby adopted to hereafter
read as follows:
ARTICLE 17. SIG' REGULATIONS
A, General Provisions
1, Purpose & Intent
2. Definitioas
3. Signs Not Regulated
4, Prohibited Signs
5 Administration 6 Enforcement
S. Permits
C. Portable Signs
D. Regular.lon of Signs by Zoning Districts
E. Regulation of Attached Signs
F, Abandoned Signs
C. Special Provisions
1, Mannar of Kaasurement
2. Setback Clearance Zone ,
3, Signs on Certain Highways
4, Claarance from Electrical Lines
5. Temporary b Political Signs
6. Sign Haintenance
7. Identification of Signs
H. Noncon!orming Signs
I, Special Exceptions Allowed
J. Historical Landmark Signs
C. Conflicting Provisions
A.. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Pucoose and Intent, it is the purpose of this Article to
regulate the construction, erection, placement, maintenance, use
and removAl, of private signs within the City of Denton, Texas,
PAGE 2
1
It is the intent of this A.rti,ole to regulate signs $$morally
by classifying each sign according to its dasign and construction
and by regulating, based on such Claseifioatioh, the type,
number, size, height and setback of signs according to location
£n the various zoning districts.
It to also the intent and determination of the City Council
that these regulations be and are the minimum necessary and least
burdensome to aoooap!.ieh the purposes heretofore stated,
2. Definitions, rho following words, as used in this Article
or Article 7, shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to
them, as follower
(a) "Advartisin"' shall seam to seek the attraction of or
to direct the attention of the public to any location,
goods, services, or merchandise whatsoever,
(b) "business Purposes" shall mean the erection or use of
any property, building, or structure, parmanont or
cemporar , for the primary purpose of uonduating in
said building or structure or on said property a
leSSitimate nomaercial enterprise in compliance with
a11' ordinances and regulations of the City o,° Denton
governing such activity. Business purpose shill not
include any property, building, or structure arected
or used for the primary purpose of securing a permit
to *root a sign,
(c) "Curb line" shall mean an imaginary line drawn along
the outermost part or back of the curb and gutter on
either side of a public street, or if no curb and
Sutter exist, along the outermost portion of the
pavement, or, if no pavement exist, along the edge of
the traveled portion of the roadway,
(d) "Effective area" means the area enclosed by the
minimumImaginary rectangle ar vertical and horizontal
lines which fully contains all extremities of a sign
(or signs), exclusive of its supporting structure.
This rectangle is to be calculated from An orthograpnic
projection of the sign viewed horizontally. A view-
point for this projection is to be taken which gives
the largest rectangle of that kind, as the viewpoint
is rotated horizontally around the sign. If elements
of the sign are movable or flexiole, as a flag or
string of lights, the measurement shall be taken when
the elements are fully extended and parallel to the
plane of view.
(a) "Non-Residential Zoning Distriec" means any zoning
district designated as a P) 0, 14'S, GR, r, LI or R1
district as shown on the official zoning district map
of the City of Denton.
(f) "Owner" means a person who nas legal ci:le, control or
possession of property.
(g) "Premises" shall mean a lot, parcel or tract of real
property as shown on a plat approved in accordance
with law and filed with the County Clerk's Office or
PAGE 3
1
r,
an unpletted treat of land as oonvayed by deed or
operation of law and recorded in the oflliaiel records
of the County Clerk's Office.
(h) "Residential xontag •Aistriot" means any toning
district designated as an A SF-7, SF-l0, $r-13$
F-16, 2-F, M -R, MF-1 or MF-~t district as shown on
thn official toning district map of the City of Denton.
(i) "Side Yard Setback Linet," mean the imaginary lines
drawn parallel to the s/,de yard lot line or property
lines on a premise which delineate the minimum
required side yard areas for that premise,
(j) "Sign" shall mean any device, fla , lignt fixture
picture, letter, word, message, symbol, plaque, wind
device, or poster visible from the premises on which
it is located or from any public street and designed
to inform or attract the attention of persons not on
that premise, excluding those searchlights and
landscape fixtures which display no words or symbols
and those works of art which display no words or
additional symbols.
For putpoes of this Article, or Article 7, particular
types of signs are further defined herein as follows;
(1) "Abandoned Sign" shall mean an on-premise sign
advertising in activity, business, service or
merchandise which was at one time,- but is no
longer, located on the premise.
(2) "Attached Sign" shall mean any sign attached to,
applied on or supported b , any part of a building
(such as a wall, roof, w ndow, canopy, awning, or
marquee) which encloses or covers usable space,
Wall signs, roof signs and projecting signs shall
be considered attached signs.
(1) "Dilapidated or Deteriorated SLgn" shall mean a
sign,
(aa) Where elements of the surface or background
can be sawn as viewed from the normal viewing
distance (intended viawing distance), to have
portions of the finished materiel or paint
flaked, broken off, or missing, jr otherwise
not in harmony with the rest of the surface,
or
(bb) Whave the structural support or frame members
are visibly bent, broken, dented, or torn; or
(cc) Where the penal is visibly cracked or in the
case of wood and similar products, splintered
in such a way as to constitute an unsiaOtly
or harmful condition; or
(dd) Where the sign or ale,~ants of it are twisted
or leaning or at angles other than those at
which it was originally erected (such as may
result from being blown or the failure of a
structural support); or
(se) Where chi message or wording can no longer 'oe
clearly read by a person .rich normal syssignt
under normal viewing conditions,
PAGE 4
(4) "Ground $iga" 0411 aeea 4 sign whose principal
support is rovided by buryia , anchor a or other-
vise oonaeoUAl the sign, os~ support structure
thorW, to the ground i0 such a meaner as not to be
easily or quickly removed or relocated, and which is
not a stake sign, portable sign or attached sign.
(S) "Off-Pramis• Si`a" shell 6440 any sign advertising a
busip}}sa, activity, goods, products or services not
usually located on the premises where the sign is
located or which directs parsons to any premise other
than where such sign is located.
(6) "On-Promise Sign" shall moan any tiro advertising the
business, person, hetivity0 goods, products or
services prim rily locate41 sold or offered for sale
on the premises where the sign is located. A sign
which promotes or 414ppl4y4 a political, religious or
ideological thought, beLlhf, opinion or other purely
noncommercial message Ilhall be considered an
on-premise sign.
(7) "One Sign" or "A Sign" sha1i mean any number of signs
located on or supported 6,y a single supporting
structure.
(8) "Portable Sign" shall mean a sign whose principal
supporting structure is intended, by design or
construct on, to be used by resting upon the ground
for support and which may be *silly and quickly moved
or relocated for reuse, Portable signs shall include,
but not be limited to, signs mounted upon or designed
to be mounted upon a trailer, bench, wheeled oarrisr
or other non-motorized mobile structure with or with-
out wheels; and A-frame signs and other similar
signs, or supporting structures thereof, resting or
leaning on the ground or other structures but not
permanently attached thereto,
(9) "Pr acting Sign" shall mean any sign which is wholly
affixed to, or supported by any building wall, and
which exttnds beyond the building wall more than
twelve (12 inches,
(10) "Roof Sign" shall mean any sign wholly erected in,
affixed to, constructed on, maintained upon, supported
by, or located upon any roof o? any building,
(11) "Stake Sign" shall mean a sign whose principal sup-
porting structure is so designed or shaped, usually
by making one and pointed, so as to be erected and
used by pushing, pounding, hammering or forcing into
the ground and allowing quick and easy removal and
relocation from one place to another,
(12) "Wall Sign" r,hall mean any sign wnolly affixed to,
suppggcreed by, or ppminted upon the wall of any
huilding, and which is not a projecting sign.
(k) "Supporting Structure" means any pole, post, cabl?, or
other structural fixtures, or parts, so arranged or used
so as to hold, secure or support a sign, or part thereof,
and which is not imprinted or labeled with any picture,
symbol, letters, numbers, or words in excess of one inch
in height nor is internally or decoratively illuminated.
(1) "hind Device" means any flag, banner, pennant, streamer or
similar device that moves -reely in the air,
PAGE 5
3. $iina Not Roaulttlid- The followigg types of IiRas shall
be' exempt from the provisions of this Artiolei
(a) Gove atal Sixna, Any sign erected or maintained
pu ua to 4 in discharge of any gover=ental
function or which is required by law, ordinance or
govera"stal regulation.
(b) gai}~ Signs, My sign witnin or on railway property
alntained in raference to the operation
an ooo or railway.
such
(o) UtilitvoIlzas. Signs seeking utility or underground
co u oa s or transmission lines.
(d) Ve a . 'Signs displayed or used upon vehicles,
tra e s or aircraft unless such vehicle, trailer or
aircraft on which such sign is displayed is permanently
stationed or regularly used at a fixed location to
serve the seas or aimilar purpose of a permanent or
portable sign not affixed to a vehicle, trailer or
aircraft.
(e) Signs Not Visib F Qg,treet. Any sign where no part
uc i ga T vi3 bTa arom any public street.
w o da 1i ou Si ns, Temporary holiday or
re g oup s gns without commercial advertising.
(g) on P r sons. Hand held signs, signs, symbols or
HIN ays on persons or animals.
(h) U__~p1u__s~~ed~~Siltpa. Signs being manufactured, transported
or storeaed not being used, in any manner or form,
for purposis of advertising.
(1) _P_.l_~__a.qque_s__. Commemorative plaques of recognized
sTF-o`rical societies and organizations.
(y) Private Traffic Control. On-premise signs which
meet Me movement o traffic on private, property
(such as ancrance and exic signs) or warn of
obstacles, overhead clearances, or control parking;
provided that such signs, are less than 10 feet in
effective area, are less cntn 6 feet in height, and
are not placed to is to interfere with she safe
movement of vehicles or pedestrians.
(k) Mail Soxes, Newspaper Racks.. Signs located on mail
oxesi newspaper van ng machines, and curbside
residential newspaper holders which identify the owner
and address of the premises or the name of the
newspaper sold or subscribed to; provided, that such
devices see not placed so as to interfere with the
safe movement of pedestrians or vehicular traffic.
(1) Signs on Outdoor !lachin , 0e vice a ~d 1,,Iement. Signs
cents on, at none to oY patea upon machines,
devices and equipment located or used outdoors which do
not generally advertise the business wnera such
machines, devices and equipment are used or located but
do, in regard to such machines, devices or equipment,
identity its trademark, tradename or manuficcuvar; give
the name or cost of the produce or service provided
therefrom; or give the operating instructions therefor,
PAGE 6
not be limited devices 4oi,a opera 11 Yondin~lmachines, fuel
disppensin pampa, Calephoae booths or aoiliCies, auto
-
matio tel~er machine{, automotive vacuum cleaners, and
other similar self-servios outdoor machines, devices or
equipment.
4, Prohibited UJI . IC shall be unlawful for any person to
erect, construct, maiatain, reconstruct, place, convert, locate
or make use of or cause to be erected, constructed, maintained,
M
reconstructed, placed, located or used, any of the following
signs for advertising purposesi
(a) S~Ana on -Private. Property without consent of Owner,
5 gns ocat• on private property wit iF'oUt tFie consent
of the owner of said premises,
(b) Parki_n.~Ltand N~~~gqeuv Areas. Signs which are
T6iCi3-ilI _ar 'titiCi! it~he use of a required
off-street
ttparking space or maneuvering area.
(c) a41 f S~r&MI dila t ated or which In r of ror
therwise unsafe, p danger falling (d) Si_ anso Pubes lto proper Signs which are located on
or w t nn a pu o Stec,', sidewalk, allay, right-of-
way, curb, or any public bridge or part of Same, or on
any public building or structure of any kind belonging
to c'he City, when such use or location unreasonably
interferes with, or creates danger in the use of the
public property, in any ease, ground or portable
signs shall not be located within the public right
of-way and no sign shall be located with- in a street
median or intersection visibility triangle,
(a) Coda Compliance. Signs which do not comply with any
a- pTicr61provision of a building code, electrical
code, or other applicable code or ordinance of the
City,
(f) Trees and Shrubs. Signs located on trees and shrubs,
(g) Motion Picture gSoi nsieturSimachinahich employ a
Itersopcialir (h) _5~___gg~ns Obsr
ouurinum~3 noaraSf< intarfeueri~ a n Wit
ehr as cView.o obsc Sigurnes
t5ca,t,gd s manner
or otherwise interfere with the effectiveness of an
official traffic sign, signal or device or so as to
obstruct or lntorfare with the view of a driver o°
approaching, emerging or intersecting traffic, or so
as to prevent any traveler on any street from
obtaining a clear view of approaching vehicles for a
distance of 250 £eet aLong the street,
(1) Proper Snieldin of Li htad Signs, Signs containing
or making use o ligncs whicn are not effectively
sniolded as to prevent beams' or rays of lights from
being directed at any portion of ttna travoled way of a
public street or which are of such intensity or
brilliance, regardless of use, directions or
shielding, so as to likely impair or Interfere with
the vision of any driver of any motor vehicle upon a
public street.
PACE 7
f
(1) My lion with
o O s except temporary
Chriet"s lights or signs %ihich hove a moviag menage
or which have automatically vhangins messsgos,
S, Ada ist;ge#on yW Ealoraeeent, rho Sualdias Otfintal
stall enforce and admiaister the provisions of this Article. The
BuildinS Official or City Manager may delegate the duties and
powers granted to and imposed upon the Building Official by this
Article,
B. PERMITS,
1, Permit Required for Signs, It snall be unlawful for any
person to place, locate, treat, construct, reconstruct, alter,
maintain, Pr make use of any sign, not exempt from regulation,
without having first secured a written permit for such sign from
the Building Official, except as otherwise provided in this
Article.
2. Exceotions tq Permit Recutrament, rho following types of
regulated sighs shall be exempt from the permit requirements of
this Article, but must comply with all other applicable regulation
of this Article,
(a) Legally nonconforming signs as defined in this Article,
(b) Wall signs, legal notices and building address numbers,
(c) State or National Flags,
(d) Signs painted on glass surfaces of windows or doors,
(e) Portable Signs,
(f) Stake Signs,
3. Apolication Procedure, Ine application for a sik:n permit
shall be submitted on such forms as tno Building Official may
proscribe and shall be accompanied by such Lnformation, drawings
r
and descriptive data as required by the Building Official to in-
sure proper regulation of such sign and to Lnsure compliance with
this Article,
4. PermiNo. If the plans and specifications for such sign
set forth in any application for a permit conform to all of the
requirements of this Ar,<cle and any other ordinance or law
applicable thereto, the Building Official snall, upon payment of
the following fee, issue the, appropriate permit;
PAGE 8
Effective ,6126 of Sian (9c, Ft,) FU
0 to ~ SO 315100
over y0 to 100 M Q0
.80
over 100 'too 0000 23, 0
over 200
over 300 50.00
S. Duration of Permit. Ualesa otherwise revoked, all permits
issued for signs shall be valid for an indefinite period of time,
except as otherwise provided for in this Article,
b. Revocation of Permit; Aooeals.
(a) lie oov r Ho~ti he t r r. The Building official is
Teare y - S~aa e power to revoke any and d all all at n
permits for violation of any provision of this
Artf.cle'; provided that, the Building Official shall
conduct a hearing, if requested by the permit holder,
prior to the revocation of the permit The person
whose permit to under consideration shall be given at
least ten (10) days written notice of the late and
time of the hearing and shall be permitted to present
relevant facts riagarding the pendin revocation.
Following such hearing the Building Official shall
issue a written decision, and, if such permit is to be
revoked, provide the permit holder with a copy of Ruch
decision and order revoking such permit.
(b) l~eis from Revocation. Any pormitholder wishing to
appeal t e ee s on an order of the Building Official
revoking a sign permit may aeai the same to the
Board of Adjustment in acc.with the laws,
ordinances, regulations and procedures governing other
matters appealed to said Board.
C. PORTABLE SIGNS.
1, Regulations Applicable to all Portable Siar,s. In addition
to all other applicable provisions the following regulations
shall apply to all portable signs in all zoning districts;
(a) F'lashin LL hts Prohibited, No portable sign shall
e use so a9 t0 mnke usa of any flashing or
intermittent lights on or in conjunction with such
sign.
(b) Signs 4nahored. All portable signs used for
a"civer-" l Mig pur?^scc, when not in transit, shall be
securely anchored, so as to prevent overturning or
unsafe movement, the su.1ficiancyy of such anchorage to
be determined by the Building Official.
(c) Maximum Size. No portable sign shall be used for
a very ng, which is in ixcess of 72 square feet of
ef fectivae area
2, Number of On-Premise Portable S!izns Limited. No person
shall place) erect, maintain or make use of, at anyone time, on
any oaa premise more than two (2) on-preftise portable signs for
purposes of advertising of an effective area of 25 square feet
PACE 9
or less or more than one (1) on-promise portable sign for
purposee of advsrtising of as effective area of aore than 23
square feet.
3. Rotulation of Off-Premise Portable Signs, The following
regulations shall apply to all off-premise portable signs used
for aivrwAsingr
(a) N m r L • No person shall erect, maintain or
is • use o more than ode oRf•premise portable sign
at gayy one time to advertise, Identify or otherwise
give irformatio'n relating to the business, activity,
event, product or service, whether one or mote,
located on or at any one business, store or
commercial w ablishaent.
(b) Seac~ep No persoq snail place, erect, asks use of
or maintain an off•pFreaise portable sign within 456
feat of soother Off-pr.gise portable) sign. In
computing the,spacingi requirement, the moasuresent
shall be made paralle to the nearest curb line and
on the same side of the strut,
(c) _Id..,~ntific do , The owner of an off-premlye portable
sign sh*11 cause 'each' sign to ba conspicuously
labeled or marked with the owner s name, address and
telephone number,
(d) Ra$ister To Be Kept, Every owner placing, using or
maznta n ng an o premiss portable sign shall keeo
a currant register or, book showing the date or dates
wnen, and lot:aCion of the premises where, such sign
is placed or used. No person shall record or
register a sign as being used on a date or dares or
at a premise when such sign was not so used. Every
person required to keep a current regiscar or book
shall make such register or book available to the
Building Enspector for inspection, upon demand, at
any reasonable time,
4. Abatement of Off-Pramiss Portable Signs in Five Year.
3eginning five years from the affective date of this ordinance,
no person shall erect, use, make use of, or maintain any off-
prtamise portable sign for advertising or business purposes.
D. REGULATION OF SIGNS 3Y ZONING DISTRICTS.
The following regulations apply to specified signs in the
specified zoning districts.
1. Residential D stricty. The following regulations snall
apply to signs in all residential coning districts.
(a) Type. Roof., projecting, portabla or off-premise
st309 are proUibiced.
(b) Hem zhc. No sign snall have a greater haignc than 23
.eat.
PAGE 10
(o) No sirs shall have an effective area greater
w $0 square fat,
(d) Sa All ground sisal shall maia;aio a minimum
MEMO or a tbeok 41,0 the curb ice which is
boat yard !ox that prestiise where the sign loc tad.
(e) onmise; except ase provid d f kr as folio ci tad on
(1) Any ppremises fronting more than one public street,
whicp is not an alloy, shall be allowed to make
use of one ground sign on each separate street
frontage.
(2) Any promise which has more than 450 feet of public
strut frontage on any one public street (axclud-
ingNalleys) may make use of one additional ground
siga for each 450 feet of froata s, or fraction
thereof; the round signs to be placed no closer
than oma-halfg of the total distance of total
street frontage on which they are used.
2. Non•Resident}a1 Districts. The following rojulations
shall apply to signs in nos-residential zoning districts:
(a) Type. All types of signs are permitted.
(b) No sign, which is not a roof sign, shill
ova a height granter than 40 feet.
(a) Sizaa. No sign shall have an effective area greater
than 400 square feet.
(d) Setback. All ground, portable, and protecting signs
s a ~ %aintain a minimum distance or setback from the
curb line, as determined by height and effective
area, in accordance with the following:
4 idinimum Serback Ft
3 30 30 30
Height (ft.) 2 20 20 JO
10 20 30
0 50 150 400
Effective Ares (Sq.Ft.)
(In datarmining the required setback the measurement
of the height or effective area o the sign which
would require the greatest satbaok shall be used;
provided, however, that if the datermintng height or
effective area measurement is a dimension that
separates two different setback requirements the
least'r;tstriettve setback shall be used.)
(a) Number, only one ground sign, or supporting struc-
ture shall be located on any one promise,
except as follows:
(1) Any remissa fronting more than one public street,
which is not an allay, snail be allowed to maze
use of one ground sign for aach separate strast
frontage.
PACE 11
M
(2) ,tay pY ise whiah has mvr• Chia 4$0 foot 01 ublio
$tsRit rootage oa any one street (oxcludiag a l.eys)
may make use of *as additional 4y0 foot of 1ia~agao
Placed
or ftiaation thereof. The signs to be
closer than QQae-hstlf of the total distaaoe of the
total street !rootage oa which they or* used.
(3)' srrsitts bust**$$ Orause to sdividedbuilpdia$s,vfbicK
Msaws or use thereon shall be allowed one ar core
on•preriae signs on the permitted supporting
structures thereon.
9. planned Deygloyagnt Dis c . All signs located in a
?leaned Development District shall comply with all provisions of
this Article including any provision that would have been
applicable to the property on which the sign is located had the
property been otherwise toned into districts in accordanos with
the uses shown on the approved site plan for such Planned
Developments provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning
Commission may racommead, and the City Council may vary La the
planned development ordinance for said premises, any of the siga
roquiremsnts of this AL-title as such requirements would apply to
signs Ln Planned Developmeat Districts,
4, Central Business Districts. The following regulations
shall apply to signs in Central Business Zoning Districts.
(a) Ai ht -of-wa Li itae t or exren SntostheN pppublic
jrightnof!wiy for a pro of more than 10 feet or
within 2 feet of the nearest curb line, whichever is
more restrictive. No projecting sign, supporting
pstructure, or part thereof which extends into the
between he g ound ylevelland 8 uEeatdabovefsaid ground
level in said right-of-way.
(b) Site, 400osqua n shill have an effective area greater
(c) Height Limitation No ground sign or supportin%q
structure C •reo~ shall have a height greater then 40
feet'.
E, REGULATION OF ATTACHED SIGNS.
In addition to any other applicable regulations, the'follow-
ing regulations shall apply to the type of sign specified in all
zoning districrs.
1. Roof Signs.
(a) PrtlleCtion. Roof signs, or the supporting structure
thereof, shall not extend laturally beyond the exterior walls,
PAGE 12
CC upward beyond the highoat point of the roof of the building on
whieb it is located, to a height, as measured fros► ground level
to the highest part of the roof, which is greater than specified
below as followai
l oae O()story bldg S x o bld$ height
2 two (i) story bldg 3% o bldg height
13~ three (3) to five (S) story bldg 30% of bldg hoight
4~ six 6)) to aia! (9) Cory bldg Z J% of bld height
Srr tea ~10) to listton (1 S) story bldg 2 % of b d height
6) sixteen (16) story bldg or higher Max. height of 40 feet strgStog. (b) seou o -the building uponiwhichsthey are installed,
2. Pr0leotiat Sixaa,
(a) C All projsetiag signs shall be securely
4ttadAdd to the building, or structure.
(b) Proi.coi0a Ing"d A projecting sign shall not
61 ~S £id ofi' r#- Y 1 of Any building so as to
proloot above t'- roof or parapet wall or above the
roo level where there is no parapet Wall; except that
a sign ereatod at a right angle to the building, the
horizontal width of which sign, perpendicular to such
wall, does not exceed eighteen inches may be erected
to a height not exceeding 2 feet above the roof or
parapet wall or above the roof level where there is no
parapet wail. A sign attached to a corner of a
building sad parallel to the vertical llae of such
corner, shall be dewed to be erected at a right angle
to the buildia, wall,
(c) Sire. The total square footage of all projecting
s Qns shall not exceed twenty (20X) percent of the
wall area on which such signs are :.coated.
3. Wall Signs.
(a) Construction. Well signs a4tachad to exterior walls
o solid masoary, concrete or stone, shall be safely
and securely attached. Wood blocks shall not be used
for anchors e, except in the case of wall signs
attached to buildings with walls of wood, A wall sign
shall not be supported by anchorages secures; to an
unbraeed parapet wall.
(b) Size. The total square footage of all wall signs
snail not exceed tws;;ty (20..) ercent of the wall area
on which such signs are located.
4. Sisns on Common 8411dinis, Wnan one or more attached
signs are located or to be located on a building which is divided
and contains more than one business or use, the regulation of
such attached signs specified herein, as to size and projection,
shall apply separately to the part of the exterior walls which
contain that business or use.
PACE 13
F. ABANDONED SIGNS
Removal Of A440400e4 Signs. All abandoned signs And their
supporting structures, if not a b"1diag, shall be removed within
thirty (30) days from the date of abandonment by the owner of the
premises on which such sign is located. Any sign or supporting
structure which is an abandoned sign on the effective date of
this ordinance shall be removed within thirty (30) days of the
effective date of this ordinance.
2. Extension of Time To Use, The owner or lessee of the
premises on which an abandoned sign is located, who desires to
use such sign, or supporting structure, may within sixty (60)
days of the. abandonment or effective date of this ordinance, make
application to the Building Official for an extension of time cc
make use of such sign. If the sign or supporting structure
conforms to all requirements of the law and the applicant submits
reasonable evidence that he is endeavoring to make use of such
sign in a lawful manner the Building Official may grant an
extension of time up to a maxinum of twelve (12) months for the
owner or lessee to make use of the sign. The Building Official
may, as a condition of granting such extension require that the
owner or lessee paint out, obscure, cover, or remove some or all
of the elements or message or face portion of the sign in such
manner as to leave the sign and supporting structure neat and
unobtrusive in appearance or in narmony with the adjacent
buildings to which it is located or attached.
3. Procedure for Removal of Abandoned Signs, Any abandoned
sign for which an extension of time to use has not been grsnred,.
or any unlawful sign or supporting structure thereof, is hereby
declared a public nuisance and may be removed in accordance with
cha procedures set forth herein.
(a) Ngtioe and Order. The Building Official shall deliver
or send a written notice to the person responsible for
placement, erection, or maintenance of an abandoned,
or unlawful sign, if known, or if not known, to the
owner or person in control of the sign or premisea
where such siggn is located, ordering the removal of
such sign and its supporting structure within tan
(10) days of delivery or mailing of the notice and
PAGE 14
order. for purposes of this rovi4ioa th aw of the
ocher local Max bid 6 Nthe rtsdioaiou for tax p 9poses r as e the
owoor of the premises where such abandoned or ualawfu.
si{n to 1040e4 shall be pro$W"d to 00 the owner of
such property or the agent for such owner and notice
mailed or delivered to said person at the address
listed shall be presumed to be sufficient.
(b) If the person ordered to remove said
iemoava s to do so wLthia the time specified, the
Bu Win Official say, after twenty (20) days of the
date o ~ delivery or aailiag of the notice and order,
remove or cause said alga to be resovedi provided,
however, that any person assrieved by said order say
Ells an appeal with the bosrA of Adiustuasat is
accordance with the provisions applicable for other
appeals fro* decisions of the building Official. In
case suep appeal 14 timely filed, the procedures
applicabll to other appeals shall be followed and the
order of the building Official may be stayed in
accordance thereof pendiag the final determination of
the board of Adjustment,
(c) ~g at -of Silasl, t~o* g~s~ tion:..Disnosal. Any sign
w r" +~ci ova y eE Iu ag 02M.I.&I pursuant to
those provisions shall be impounded and transported to
and stored by the building Official at a location
designated for such purpose, leoords of where such
si ns were located sad when removed shall be kept, rho
Building Official shall goad a letter to the owner of
such :si a, if known, or if not known, to the owner or
parson in control of the premises where such sign is
Located giving notice of such impoundment.
The building Official shall hold the sign in storage
for at least thirty (30) days alter notice of impound-
ment has been mailed. Any portable sign may be redeemed
hi the owner thereof upon the payment of a fee to the
City of Denton through the Building Official, of a total
of $25.00 for hauling the same to storage plus $1,00
per dog storage fee, Any nonportable sign may be
redeemed by the owner thereof upon payment of the cost
of removal of and hauling the same to storage, as
determined by the Building Official, plus $1,00 per day
storage fee.
Any sign not reclaimed by the owner thereof within
thirty` (30) days of the mailing of the notice of
impoundment may be disposed of in accordance with
applicable law,
(d) Rec ve.rY 4f. Costs, 11, upon disposal of an unredeemed
~F aE'oT sr! M, rho Building Official has not
received an amount sufficiant cc cover the cost of
removal and haulLnqq of such removed sign, the Building
Official shall send notice to the owner of the promises
where s4ch sign was located requesting payment of Me
removal and hauling costa less any amount receieed in
disposal of such sign. An such 'costs remaining unpaid
after thit'tyy (30.) U:,* from the data of mailing of
notice shall-bacome delinquent end shall bear interest
at ton (10%) percent per annum, The Building Official
may cause such unpaid and delinquent amount to be
assessed 'against the premises where such removed sign
was 1ittod by filing and perff4CIng a lien against
said promises. The cost leVisd+4gatnst said premises
shall include a $50.00 administration fee.
PAGE 15
f ,
(e) ADOG&I Of Coot IS"doodl v , Any pperaaa stay 4000
40SI Eor rho roSOV41
O TA Also W00447 ~ he filial as p"I with
the $004 oc Ad uotaost wtt;L twagty (20~ 4#Y4 of
bqs Meilia$ of t~ aotiw of , such coats. The bard
al s int 4~r hither uphold tho oosC isp►osed by
the luildieg official or _is0e64 aa4 amuse to be
levied whatever cost it considers to be roaaooable.
Stot• a coats imposed hereunder shall not be
4ppea~able.
0. SPSCIAL PROVISIONS,
1. Haan. er of Measurement,
(a) Setba~4. To apply the setback provision of this
Art o s for it as at may one oiac, the following
measuring procedure shall be usedP,
(1) Draw as La#sLaary vertical line 4xteadiag upward
from. the curb line of the premises;
(2) Bagi4o1ag at any point an the vertical line draw
as tssa=iaary horizontal line perpendicular to the
vertical line and curb Ilae and extending toward
the premises;
(3) Bagiaaiag at the point where the vertical line
ant*rt3gts qqhe hottixoatal line, measure along the
herisental line !or the required setback, (See
Appendix Illustration 14a)
(b) H~aighht~ To apply the applicable height limitations
U--Mts Article at any one point for signs, or
supporting structures thereof, which are not roof
sagas, the following measuring procedure shall be
used;
(1) Draw as imaginary vertical line extending upward
from the nearest curb line of the public street
fronting the premises;
(2) Beginnint at the surface level of the curb line
measure along the vertical line to a point which
is the maximum allowed height for a particular
sign or supporting structure;
(3) Proa that ppoint draw an imaginary horizontal line
perpandicular to the vertical line towards the
premises;
(4) This extended horizontal, line divas the maximum
height allowed at that location for a particular
si a or supporting structure, (Sae Appendix
Illustration 14b),
(c) Effs C v Area. In data ftiotng the effective area of
a a gn where more than one. sign is Located or affixed
t~ a single supporting structure, all signs located
thereon or affixed thereto shall be Included and
measured together as though they were one sign,
2, Setback Clearance Zone. In all zoning districts, except
Central Business Districts, all ground signs shall be so located
so that no part of the effective area of such sign shall occupy
PAGE 16
i
this apace, (as determined is the sere saner for musuri.as
height and setback for algae), between 2 end 10 feet is height
within 15 feet of the curb liae of say public street, (See
Appendix Illustration 144),
The supporting structure of such aign may occupy such space
to an extent no greater than 2 square feet in area, such area to
be determined in the some manner as for effective area of signs.
3. Stage gn cgrtaia h ahves. The provisions of this
Article shall apply to all signs along the Interstate or Primary
System of UlWayls within the City to the extent that such
provisions supplement or compliment, but are not is conflict
with, any law, rule or' regulation scooted by or made pursuant to
the Federal Highway beautification Act, (23 U.S.C,A., $ec.
at, seq) including all amendments thereto, or the Texas Highway
Beautification hot, (Article 6674 V•1, V,A.C.S.) including all
amendments thereto. All sign permits issued by the building
Official pursuant to this Article shall contain a notice
advising the parmittse that signs located along the interstice
or primary system of highways may be regulated by federal or
state law or regulation and a permit may be required from
another governmantal agency.
4, Clearance from Elgctrical Lines. Signs shall be located
a minimum distance of 6 feet measured horizontally and 12 feet
measured vertically from overhead electrical conductors which
are energized in excess of 150 volts. The term "o,arhead
conductors" as used herein means any electrical conductor,
either base or insulated, installed above the ground.
5. Temporary and political SLM.
(a) Temporary real estate sales and development, temporary
political, occasional sales and other special use
signs which are used for, or relate to, a paveicular
purpose or event shall be removed by the owner of the
promise on which they are looacad attar too (10) days
of the date of the accomplishment of. the purpose for
wnioh they are used or the occurrence of the event to
which they refer or colic.
(b) In the case of cemporary political signs the
candidate to which 'a sign refers, -if not pl'acej on a
premise by chi owner of the promise cnereof, snail be
IIAGE 17
s
N
d
responsible for the removal for such signs within the
time specified above,
(o,) Stews or portable signs which slat to a oaadidete or
issue to be voted upon by a political, party or at a
p blia election end are 2S square or lets to
n estiv AreadWmarehit 0*4 e4 wnii hout01 ~ Lri visas dto
other appliaabl0 raquirwots oil this Areiole.
6, Sian Maintemaaoe. All signs and supporting structures
shall be kept in good repair, condition and appearance. All
faces, bolts, supporting frames and fastenings shall be free from
datsrioration, insect or rodent infestation, rot or loosening.
Painted signs which are faded or obscured because of weather or
time shall be repainted or redone or painted over so as to be
neat in appearance.
7. Identifioation of Skins. Every off-premise sign shall be
plainly marked at all timas, in a location to a to be conspicuous
and easily identifiable, with the current name, address and tals-
phone number of the owner or lessee of the silo.
H. NONCONFORMING SIGNS.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this Articla, defining
and regulating nonconforming signs, shall control over any other
conflicting provision of the zoning ordinance.
2, Defined. A sign, including its supporting structure, shall
be considered nonconforming when it does not conform to all or
part of the provisions of this Article applicable thereto, is not
a portable sign or stake sign, and:
(a) w 1a to existence and lawfully located and used on the
effective date of this Article, or;
(b) was in existence and lawfully located and used in
accordance with the provisions of the prior ordinance
applicable thereto, or which was considered legally
nonconforming thereunder, and has since been in
continuous or regular use; or
(c) was in existence:, located, and used on the property at
the time the property was annexed to the City of Denton
and has since been in regular and continuous use.
1, Da truction; Repair,
(a) Any nonconforming sign, including its supporting
structure, which is destroyyed, damaged, dilapidated or
deteriorated shall not be replaced, repaired,' or
PACE 18
reaovatad, in whole or is part, if such repl""Mat,
repair or rRnovstioa wguld require axpdodituro of
monies is exoess of fi!r percent yy0~) of the raeppro-
ductioa cost of a new 14 iaolu as its iupporbiag
structure, which,is substsatially tlpi sass or aiailar
to the noaoanfotsiag sign destroyed, da"ged,
dilapidated or deteriorated.
(b) The buildiaj official "y, whenever he d necessary
- to reasons ly determine the applieab~Iey of the
foregoing provision, require the owner of said non-
conforming sign to subait two or more independent
estimates from established sign companies of the cost
of replaciag, repairing or renovating, to whole or in
pert, the onisting noaccaforsia si~a and two or more
ladeppeadent estisiatas from estatlished sign compeaies
of the reproduction coat of a now sign, including its
pp rt ilgrstruotursit e which is ng substantially the sesia
or gi destroyed
damaged to th dilapidated or deteriorated
(c) No sign or supportiag structure which is 1 vfully
reproduced, ,repaired, or renovated as a noncon orsing
sign shall be increased in effective area or height.
4. Torainationt Time Period All legally' Aonoooforsiag signs,
including supporting structures, shall be removed or modified so
as to comply with the provisions of this article on or before
January 1, 1994 or within ten (10) years of the date ttto sign
became nonconforming, whichever is later.
5. Appeals from 'termination Period. The owner of any noncon-
forming sign may appeal the termination time specified for such
sign to the Board of Adjustment, Appeal proeidures, unless
otherwise specified herein, shall be those as used in other
matters appealed to the Board of Adjustment,
(a) Tilin~Ap~eais, The owner of any nonconform-
ng 9 ggn Who w she to appeal the termination date
applicable cc such owner's sign shall file his appeal
wiith the Board of Adjustment wi" in one (1) year of
the effective data of the ordinance or within one (1)
year the premises on which is located a nonconforming
sign is annexed to the City, Failure to file such
appeal within the time specified constitutes a waiver
of the right to appeal or contest the termination date
applicable to such nonconforming sign.
(b) Hearine Aooaals. The Board of Adjustment may, in eta
serat on, near all properly filed appeals after the
one (1) year period for filing has passed and set all
appeals to be hoard at one or more times as is
convenient for such Board.
(c) Osterm nat on, The Board.of Adjustment, in case of
appsa o the applicable termination date, shall
determine whether the termination date applicable to
appellant's sign has allowed sufficient time for the
appellant to recover his capital investment in the
nonconforming sign, In making such determination the
PAGE 19
board ear atid.r the 440040t of the initial 04pital
invst"atr 90 Wpoot4ocy of the LAVOStia04, the
resiov41 4044 to aoeplr with those regulations cad any
otbAr faea r the Weed be~i.evos to be perti"at :ro the
date Min Mel !h4 *Mort sation period apple Eros
shall b4 640 uleted or ensured from the begioni.al of
tt-e, assortisation period; i.e. the date the sign
beco"t nonconforming.
(d) F.xteaeioa isatioa Period. If the (Ward
~T iuel a err na o ate as applied to
appellant a nonoonformiag sign does not afford
sufficient time to allow appellant to recoup his
investment in such siga, the board may grant, by its
order, an extension of time to a date speof#.ed so
that such sign may be maintained as a nonoonfforming
sign until such specified date.
6. Relocation of Nonconforming Signs. Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Article, any sign which is a legally
existing nonconforming sign hereunder say be relocated on the
same lot or tract of land if the silo is required to be removed
from its present location because •')f the acquisition of the
property upon which the sign is located by any governmental agency
or other entity which did or could have acquired the property
through the exercise of its power of eminent domain. Such relo-
cated sign shall be placed, insofar as possible, as to comply
with all the provisions of this Article. The termination period
specified herein shall not be extended because of such relocation.
7. Signs Located on Nonconforming Promisee. Where, on the
effective date of this ordinance, a sign is located on a premise
which is a legally nonconforming use of the premise and such sign
is used in regard thereto, the sign may be used and maintained
thereon, even though it would not be a permitted use, so long as
such premise is continually used as a lawful nonconforming use;
provided, however, if s+Ach sign is nonconforming as to height,
area, or setback, such sign shall, after the termination period
allowed herein, be brought in conformity with such requirements
applicable to the zoning district in which such sign is located.
1. SPECIAL EXCEPTYONS ALLUWED.
1. The Board of Adjustment may grant a special exception from
the provisions of this) Article for the setback or height of a
nonportable sign under the 'follo'wing circum4tances:
FACE 20
1
r ~
Whes fifty pare"t (30%) or
`e (e) 6~w Wes of Ouch assn as boated or
to 'be looted f a socordasaoa With too astbaak or hoisht
rquiroo"ts Of! Chia Artio~* 4"004 or wou d net b•
viai,Ole frost at least one 'visibility point' 640a46e
at the location of a buildi*s or structure oeas ruoted
or sreeted prior to the effective date o this
ovdi.aande.
For the purposes of this prgvisioq, "visibility point"
shall sass the viewisa locations, at a height of 6
feat Above the general surface level, determined by
extaddisg the required side yard setback lines of to
promise on which such side is toasted or to be located
so as to intersect the curb lice of the public strove
frosting said premise; than seasurisg from said iat.r-
aection points eloog the curb line in the direction of
the nearest side lot line of said lox for a distance
of 100 feet. If the street frontial said precise
allows, traffic flow in only one direction, the
visibility point located along the' curb line in he
direction from. which tvaftto approaches said pines at
shall be uaad to ddetermine the visibility requirement
herein. (Sae Appendix tllustrstion No,, IQ).
(b) M$dical M 11 --ov r When a silo located an the
promise or act uurloacy medical treatment facility
would, because of the artback or hai`ht requiremants
of this Article, not be readily visible from adjacent
public streets. For purposes of this pvoviaioo,
Emeq enay Hsdioal Treatment Facility" shall scan any
hogpiW t clinic or other facility whore medical aid
is offered to a person or animal Qho suffers an
unexpected injury or illness which requires immediate
medical attention.
2, In granting special exceptions allowed herein, the board
of Adjustment shall specify, by writtan order,. the particular
setback or the part..oular height that will be allowed and in
doing to shall not allow deviation from the provisiona of this
Article beyond what is minimally necessary to remedy the
situation allowing for said spacial except'.on.
J. HISTOAIAL L.AR'DKARK SIGNS
The provisions of this Article shall not Apply insofar as
they confict with any provision applicable to a sign designated
as a historical landmark pursuant to the provisions oaf Article
28A of Appendix '6-Zoning of the Code of Ordinancas of the City of
Denton, Texas.
K. C014FLICT LNO PROVISIONS
Tho definitions and provisions of this Artiela applicable cc
signs shall control over any other conflicting definition or
provision found in Appendix e-toning of the Code.of Ordinances of
the City of Benton, Texas.
PAGE 21
• ~.•...1 ..t;.. iq. • • s.~ r~• `gyp '1~
S19LT1
That the Appendix Illustrations of Appendix B-tonlnj of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton are nereby Amended by
adding the following illustratioasl
141 SIGNS
14a, Measurement of Setback.
QI~
Street
urb line
14b1 Measurement of Height
SIGN
i
Curb line
1 f Nf
Pdf:F 77
r ,
34vo Setback CIGOVINOS SOAK
7 400
~ sgwr• hrt
100
j ~ sq, ft,
~ SO
I
fk
2 0 10 I p
atrtif Gurtr link
i
14d. Visibility Point
vt>rbiiity
OOIM
5 boeK -
1~ ~ nns ,
Slf~tt ~
Asoiiity poem
PACE 23
' SECTION IV.
That the definitions of various type signs of Article 12 (51)
through (59.1) of Appendix I-Zoning of Lna Code of Ordinances of
the City of,Denton are hereby repealed in their entirety; said
numbering to be reserved for future use.
SECT ON V
That Article 19 C of Appendix $-Zoning of the Code of Ordi-
nancas of the City of Denton relating to special development
signs is hereby repealed in its entirety; said paragraph C to be
reserved for future use.
SSCTIQN VI.
That Article 27 (52) of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton defining "sign" is hereby
repealed in its entirety; said number reserved for future use.
SECTION VII.
That Section 5-4 of Article I of Chapter 5 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton relating to permits for signs is
hereby repealed in its entirety, said section number to be
reserved for future use.
SECTION VIII,
That "I, Sign and Identification Uses" of Article 7 of
Appendix 8-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas is repealed in its entirety.
SECTION IX.
Any person who shall erect, construct, locate, pLacs, main-
tain, keep or make use of any sign in violation of any provisions
of this ordinance or otherwise violate a provision of this
ordinance, or who fails to comply therewith or with any of the
requirements thereof, or of a permit issued thereunder, shall. be
guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two
Hundred Dollars ($200.00) Each such person shall be deemed
guilty of a separate offense for etch and every day or portion
thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed,
or continued, and upon c.inviotian of any such violattoits such
person shall be punished within the 'limits above,
PACE 24
S1jCT10N X.
That if any seotioa, subsection, paragraph, $w one$$ alausa,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent
Jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such
rt,aaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION XI.
All ordiaaaoet or parts of ordiaan4es is force whoa the pro-
visions of this drdlnaaoe become effective which are iaconsistant
or in conflict with the teru or provisions contained in this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict.
SECTION XII.
That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Reoord•Chronials, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within tea (10) days of the date of
Ito passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
MILOTTL ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
C. J.; TAYLOR JR. TCITY ATtORNEY
CITY OF DENT&I W9
BY;
PAGE 2S
p:'
x,'00
itt ~r~retta~tivq of
•C. J. TAYLOR, JR0
WHEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr. was the City Attorney of the City of Denton from
November 11, 1.979 until his untimely demise July 13, 19841 and
WHEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr. served on active duty In the United States Naval
Reserve from July 24, 1942 to December 5, 1945, as a radioman aboard
the US$ Arkansas and the USS Capps) and
WHEREAS, Co J. Taylor, Jr „ earned his Doctor of Jurisprudence Degree from the
University of Missouri At Kansas City in 195? and was admittea to
practice before the Supreme Court of Texas) the Supreme Court of the
United States) U. S. Court of Appeals, N fth Circuit) N, S. District
Courts for the Northern, southern, Eastern and Western Districts of
Texasl and
WHEREAS, C. J, Taylor, Jr, enjoyed a distinge)ished reputation in the field of
governmental law, having served as Assistant Attorney General for the
State ol° Texas, Assistant City Attorney for the cities of Corpus
Christi and Austin, City Attorney for the cities of Trvilg and
Amarillo, President of the Texas City Attorneys Association In 1970,
having authored the respected and widely-uasd publication taw and
Procedures for Cities, Towns and Villages in Texas and having
leotueRd at numerous seminars throughout the state of Texas on
various aspects of the law) and
WHEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr, was a member of the State Ear of Texas) Texas City
Attorneys Assoclation) Denton County Bar Association) North Texas Bar
Association) and Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity and
WHEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr, served his community above and beyond the more
efficient discharge of his duties in promoting the welfare and
prosperity of the citizens of Denton, and earned the full respect and
admiration of his colleagues and associates)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTOH, TEXAS,
That the sincere and warm appreciation of C. J, Taylor, Jr. felt by
the citizens and officers of the City of Denton, Texas, causes this
Resolution to be formally transcribed into tha official minutes of
the city of Denton, Texas, dedicated to the rememberaace of the
•Honorable C. J, Taylor, Jr.•.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of December, 1984.
1
i
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
f '
t
ATTES
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM,
nAW
t catty Counotl minutes
September 194 1904
The Council oonvened into the Mork Session at 12100 noon in the
Training Roar of the service center.
MEMBERS
PRESLNTi Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tom Chewl Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
city manager
MEMBERS
ABSENTS None
The Council held a work session on the proposed 1984-85 budget.
The council convened into the Joint Work Seaelon with the Historic
Landmark Commission at 5130 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building.
COUNCIL
MEMBERS
PRESENT; Mayor Stewartl Mayor Pro Tom Chewl Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary
COUNCIL
MIMMBRIAS
ABSINTS None
HLC
MRMHKRS
PRESENT. Mary Hardin, Chairperson; Bullitt Lowry, Randall Boyd,
Sam Marino, Tom Mill4r and Sam Kingsbury
HLC
MEMBERS
ABSENT; Sandy Matthews, Michael Lawrence
1. The 0ouncil held a discussion of the criteria for historic
landmark designations.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he believed this designa-
tion was important but a distinction should be made betweaa the
house and the resident. A house which had been added on to the
front and the back did not do for him what he thought a historic
landmark should even if the house had been owned by a prominent or
famous Denton family,
Bullitt Lowry, member of the Historic Landmark Commission, responded
that this was a judgement call; how famous was famous. The prosent
criteria used by the commission allowed for historic designation to
homes owned by prominent families.
Council Member Hopkins suggested that an expansion on the present
criteria for designation would be pertinent to the discussion.
Randall Boyd, member of the Historic Landmark Commission, stated
that the commission did take into consideration the people who had
lived in the houses, The contribution that the person had made to
the history of Denton was reviewed as a part of the decision process.
Mayor Stewart stated that it was his opinion that the historical or
fame value of a hoarse or family should be measured by whether or not
someone from outside the city would come to Denton to see the home.
Boyd responded that designating the home as historic should not only
be done to bring in tourists but to preserve the history of Denton.
City Counoit Minutes
M#4tin9 of September la; 1944
Page Two
council Member Riddlesperget stated that there were so many houses
that would fit the present criteria, he questioned the motive of the
owner in requesting the historic zoninq claesificatlon,
Boyd replied that there were many homes in Denton which should be
designated as landmarks, However, the commission did not seek j
applications for the zoning; the petitioners came to them,
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that if the commission meNbere.
knew of houses in Denton that should have the historic landmark
designation, perhaps the commission could speak with the owners and
show them the advantages of this zoning, it was not, of coutse, the
intention of the commission or the council to influence landowners
on their deoision to apply or not to apply for the designation.
Bullitt Lowry reported that the commission was working on a
preservation plan with the downtown merchants, The commission saw
the square as an historioal district. The City had applied tot a
Main Street grant but did not receive funding as the population for
Denton was too great, The grant would have paid one-half the salary
for a Main Street Coordinator, The commission would be recommending
to the Council to proceed with hiring A Main street Coordinator even
though the City would be responsible for the entire salary,
I
Tom Miller, member of the'Histocic Landmark Commission, asked Cot
olarifiaation on the commission approaching landowners regarding
petitioning for the designation. Mr, Miller expressed the- oonaetn.
that the commission ritght recruit petitions for the designation and
the Council might deny the zoning. He felt this would place the
commission in an awkward position.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the Council would look at only
the property and not what was adjacent to the property ov who owned
the property,
The Council then convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matteta, real estate, personnel, and board appointments, No
official action was taken.
The rounoll convened into the Regular Meeting at 700 p.m, in the
council chambers,
MEMBERS
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tom Chew, Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperget and Stephens
City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secrotaty
MEMBERS
ABSENT: None
11 The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of June 19, 1984 and the Special Callod Meeting of
June 26, 1984.
Stephens motion, McAdams second to approve the Minutes as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Consent Agenda
Riddlesperger motion, Stephens second to approve the Consent Agenda
as presented, Motion carried unanimously.
2. consent Agenda!
A. Bids and Purchase Orders,
1. Bid a 9323 - Long Tet% Disability insurance
coverage
I
i
gaty council linut4s
M4atO9 of September 18, 1904
Pa9• Throe
2, Hid 0 9330 - Carpeting for Parke and Recreation
3, Bid M 9333 Pad mount switohgear
4, Bid M 9335 - Painting at Recreation Centers/
Municipal Building
5. Bid 0 9337 - Install fans at Library
6. Bid 8 9338 - Wire and cable
7. Hid M 9340 - Mobile hydraulic hammer
8, Purchase Order M 64795 to Wang Laboratories In
the amount of $3,792,00
9. Purchase Order 0 64973 to Hone Engineers in the
amount of $23,765.00
10, Purchase Order M 63465-A to Marley Cooling Tower
in the amount of $11,500,00
11, Purchase Order R 65059 to Advanced Control System
in the amount of $68,430,00
B, plate, Replats and site Plansi
1. Appproval of the preliminary plat of the Ali
Al-Khaf&JI Addition, (The Planning and Zoning
commission recommends approval,)
2. Approval of the site plan of the Carpet Max
Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
3. Approval of the site plan of the proposed
Autostopp Building, (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of the preliminary plat of Coopec e
banding, section it. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
5. Approval of the preliminary plat of the English
Village Addition, (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval,)
6. Approval of the preliminary plat of the 1-35W
Addition. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval,)
7. Approval of the preliminary plat of the Meadow
Ridge Addition, (The Planning and 'toning
Commission recommends approval,)
8. Approval of the preliminary replat of Solar Way
Addition, Section I & It, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval,)
9. Approval of the preliminary replat of the auy
Laney Addition, (The Planning and zoning
commission recommends approval,)
C. Contracts:
1. Approval of youth sports contracts for the Parks
and Recreation Department, (The Parks and
Recreation Board recommends approval,)
city council ktnutee
Keettnp of September 16, 1964
Page lour
2. Apyroval of persona; ssrvicee contracts with
Rhonda, 061tie, Totip14 tnstructor, and Betty
Noreteud, Aerobics Instructor.
The Mayor presented a Proclamation for Constitution week on
September 17 through 23, 1964, The proclamation was accepted by Me.
Nina Macklin representing the Bsn)amin Lyon Chapter of the Daughters
of the American Revolution.
3. The council considered approval of the final replat of
Township It, Phase ti (San Jacinto plaza Shopping Center). (The
Planning and Zoning commission reoommends approval.)
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that this was a
12.1 acre tract between San Jacinto Boulevard, Piney Crook
Boulevard, Township It Phase I and t-359 service road and was
currently zoned planned development tot commercial land use, The
site plan and preliminary replat were approved by Council on Auqust
70 The reopening of Piney Creek as a public road was approved In
conjunction with the approved amendment to the planned development.
staff had been under the Impression that Piney Creek Boulevard was
30 to 31 feet Wide. It had subsequently been learned that the
street was currently only 24 feet wide, The Council recommendation
had been to leave the street as it ouCrently existed, The
ppotitionec, Henry S. Killer, had a proposal they wished to ptosent
in light of the new information regarding the actual width of Piney
Creek, The petitioners, at their own expense, were coquetting to
move the current otrest to another location, rebuild the street,' put
in a new water line. They would maintain the street as a public
access easement into the new area at Township It. Many factors were
considered by the killer Company prior to making the request. One
fdctor was that the current street wag only 24 feet wide and they
believe moving the street would allow for a better alignment with
the entrance and. exits for the mall as well as allowing for a better
situation for the utilities,
Council Member Stephens asked it this new information had been found
after the Planning and zoning Commission had met on this petition.
Spivey responded yes,
Council Member Stephens asked if there were major changes to the
final replat which should be referred back to the Planning and
Zoning Commission, Stephens asked the City Attorney if the design
which had been approved were being changed, should the replat be
referred back to P&2,
Joe Morrie, Acting City Attorney, asked it this was a planned
development.
Spivey responded yes.
Morris reported that, as the petition was a planned development, the
changes on the replat did not have to go back to P&7.,
Council Member Stephens asked, if the street were moved, how much
more land would this give the petitiocler on which to build.
Spivey replied that if Panay Creak Boulevard were moved 25 feet to
the north, It would allow for more development land, would allow for
better traffic patterns, and would line up more with the entrance to
the mall.
Morris asked, as this was the final replat, if the site plan been
approved.
Spivey responded yes.
Morris stated that the site plan would have to be changed.
city Council Minutes
lNatinq of September 18, 1484
Page F ve
Counoit M*Nbar McAdams asked it the drawing which had been provided
of Piney Creek wag the existing location or the propesed relocation,
Sptvey responded that the overhead projection K,q was what the
petitioners were proposing. They were proposing to supply a 40 cost
public access center line veto moved easement 25 Whets feet to n the north would he located if the
Mayor Stewart asked it the relocation would line up with the
existing street.
Spivey responded yes,
Mayor Stewart then asked it this had not been the original complaint
from the residents of Township It,
8ppivoy responded the realigned street would only extend to the
oluater housing portion of the new Storet development,
Council Member Mogdams asked it moving the center line 25 feet would
line up the street with the Storer development,
Spivey responded yAs; the relocation would provide access into the
Storer subdivision,
Hopkins aotion, Afford second to approve the final replat of
Township I(, Phase It with the requested change for public 'access.
Spivey reported that the staff only wanted to make ,the Council aware
of the existing 24 feet width of Piney Creek Boulevard and Uad no
recommendation, Henry S. Miller Company was proposing to have Piney
Creek for public access.
Assistant City Manager Rick Svohla stated that staff was
recommending the portion of street in the Storer subdivision be a
private street as it would not meet City standards.
Council Member McAdams asked if the city was being asked to abandon
the existing Piney Creek Boulevard,
Joe Morris, Acting City Attorney, asked if the dedicated pottton of
Piney Creek was shown on the plat. Once dedicated, the City Council
had to abandon that portion. The petitioner had no control of the
street, There was 50 feet of right-of-way and the pavement was 24
feet, The council could approve the request and then abandon the
easement,
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the developer owned the land
on both sides of the street and would they dedicate the public
access easement to the City,
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla reported that Henry S. Miller had
stated that they would maintain the attest.
Morris stated that the City could not control the street if it was
abandoned,
Council Member Hopkins withdrew the motion,
Tom Moser, representing Henry S. Millar, stated that Piney Creek
Boulevard only had 50 foot of right-of~way dedicated, not 100 feet.
Henry S. Miller was proposing that Piney Creek be abandoned and the
company would then dedicate right-of-way and easements for
utilities. The surest would remain open forever and Henry S. Miller
Company would matntain it,
view motion to table the item tot one week, due to the confusion.
Motion died for lack of a second.
CityY Council minutes
mootingp of September lb, 1904
page $ix
Kgsec that stated that his firm would ptofav that the Council
approve the original plat rather than to table the item as they
needed to get the proyeot movinq.
84ophans motion, Chow second to approve the plat with the existing
Piney Creek Boulevard as presented on the agenda, Motion carried
unaniimously,
41 The Council considered adoption of an ordinance and service
plan annexing a tract of land consisting of approximately 11.2 acres
of land located north if I-35E and southeast of Mayhill Road. A--k
Denise Spiray, Development Review Planner, reported that this was
th&P final action on this annexation. The owner was requesting
voluntary annexation. Light industrial and commercial zoning would
be requested.
The following ordinance was presented%
84-115
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIQUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DMNTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL, OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 11.2
ACRES OF LAND LYINO AND BI1VO 4ITUATE0 IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE of TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE M.E.P. &
P,it.a COMPANY SURVV. A09TRACT NO, 960 AND THE O, WALKER
SuEVEY, ABSTRACT No. 1330, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS:
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
AND DECLARING AN AFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, MoAdame 11aye,11 Hopkins "aye," Stephens aye," Alford "ays,11
Riddlesperger 114ye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye.,, Motion
carried unanimously.
51 Public Heatinge
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Robert J. Button requesting a change in zoning from the general
retail (GR) and agricultural (A) classifications to the commercial
(C) and light industrial (LI) classifications on an 18,2 acre tract
at the northeast corner of I-35E and Mayhill Road. If approved, the
proposed development would have 13,7 acres of commercial zoning and
4,5 acres of light industrial zoning, z-1669
The Mayor opened the public hearing,
Mr, R, J. Button, the owner, spoke in favor stating that the
Surrounding property was currently zoned light Industrial or
commercial. To the north of the property was the railroad track, to
the east was Andrew Corporation. Several easements adversely
affected the property for apartment development. There were Texas
Power and Light and sewer easements on the property, A 12 Inch
water main with easements was in place on Mayhill Road and an 8 inch
water main on 1.35. A petition had been before the City Council on
June 8 to have the area designated as an eligible blighted area.
Button was proposing to build a hotel on I-35 and a mini-aaLl on
Mayhill at I-35, Mr. Button Showed a slide presentation of the
property and concluded by stating that the area had already dictated
what it should be.
Mr. Curt Simmons, representing Andrew Corporation, spoke in
opposition stating that his corporation did not oppose the zoning
but asked the Council to consider the current water supply to
Andrew. Another concern was drainage, Water now drained through
this IS cores and if the land were developed, retention ponds would
be headed, It the 'flow fate was not properly handled it would cause
problems for Andrew Corporation,
city council Minutes
Meetinq of September le, 1904
Page Seven
Mayor Stewart stated that the developer would have to take care of
any drainage problems,
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Denies Spivey, Development Review. Planner, reported that 8 reply
forms had been mailed with 2 returned in favor, 0 returood in
OP osition, and I returned undecided, The site was located in a
moderate intensityy center, The commercial and light industrial
zoning would provide the potential for jobs and the land uue was
reasonable, The requesting commercial zoning abutted with other
commercial zoning and the tract was In olcee proximity to the mall.
Mayor Stewart asked if the tract was close to the proposed extension
of the loop; was it out of the new loop corridor,
0 My Manager Chris Hartung responded that he believed the loop would
follow 1-3$ and Mayhill Road. The 'proposed development was
approximately 200 feet away,
1, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approvinq a change in zoning from the general retail (GR) and
agricultural (A) 'classifications to the commercial (C) and light
industrial (LI) olassifications on an 18.2 acre tract at the
northeast corner of 1-35E and Mayhill Road.
The following ordinance was pr'esonteds
NO. 84-116
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE. ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THP CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 18,2 ACRES OF LAND
SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. & P.R.R. SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 050
AND GIDEON WALKER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO, 1330, DENTON COUNTY,
TEXAS AND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF I-35F AID
MAYHtLL ROAD; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN 7,ONINO
CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL RETAIL "GR"
AND AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO
COMMERCIAL "C" AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL "LI" CLASSIFICATION AND
USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On toll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkicts "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger ,aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart 'layo,"
Motion carried unanimously.
B. The Council held a public heating on the petition of
Ed Wotski reelueating a ehanye in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the light industrial (LI) classification on a
130,6 acre tract locaLed at the southeast cotnet of Jim Christal
Road and Masch Branch Road. Z-1665.
The Mayor opened the public heating.
Mr. Larry Frank, representing the petitioner, spoke in favor stating
that this tract was located in an industrial park area as 14 was
near Brik-Pak, Peterbilt, and Victor Equipment, The tract would not
be developed tot residential use, A 16 inch water line' was in play
on the southern portion of the property and the sewer line was also
in, Street improvements would be made and utilities would be
extended. An easement for the utilities would be dedicated,
Mayor Stewart asked if the petitioner would develop this ptopE11"7
himself.
Frank responded this would be a j'bint ventuts,
city council Minuteu
Meetingq of SeptQMbar 18, 1984
page iSlght
Mayor 8tuwart asked it apartments would be built under the light
Industrial zoninj classification.
Frank responded theta would be no residential land uue in the area;
no dwelling; would be constructed.
Council Member Hopkins asked the City Attorney to addrees the Issue
of light Industrial urea at the airport.
Acting City Attorney Joe Morrie retorted that in 1963 the state had
amended the airport zoning regular one to allow cities to establish
zoning regulations for airport uses and to specify inhabitable land
use area, if cities chose to do this, they could create Airport
zoning commissions. The regulations did not have to allow foi
cumulative type zoning.
Council Member Hopkins asked Mr, Frank why the petitioner had not
requested planned development zoning.
Frank responded they had requested light industrial zorninq due to
the employment based land use.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the developer could put in
housing and the city could not do anything about it.
Frank replied that the petitioner would be glad to draw up any
documents required stating that no housing would be constructed.
Council Member Hopkins stated that would not be binding.
eounoil Mvmbar Stephens stated that he believed the Council would
feel more comfortable with planned development zoning.
Frank responded that his client had proceeded with the request for
li tit Industrial zoning based on that recommendation Zrom staff.
Council Member Stephens stated that the Planning and Zoning
Commission minutes referred to preferring this petition as a planned
development.
Council Member McAdams asked Mr. Frank if the owner would be willing
to be zoned planned development for '.fight industrial use.
Frank replied that he would have to speak with the owner.
Council Member McAdams then asked if the Council could act on this
petition at this meeting.
Acting City Attorney Joe Morris reported that the Council did not
have a planned development ordinance or site plan before them.
Council Member Jr,a Alford stated that it did not seem fair to
penalize the petitioner as they were acting on a recommendation from
staff.
Council Member Hopkins asked it it was appropriate to refer the
petition back to the planning and Zoning Commission at their next
meeting to be considered as a planned development and to waive
additional fees.
Council Member Stephens stated that off-atte +mprovemenL3 should be
considered for Jim Christal Road.
Frank responded that the Razor family owned all of the property from
the parcel to 145. To ask his client to improve the i-stire length
of Jim Cheistal Road was unfair. The Razor's should be required to
pay when they petitioned for rezoning.
vit Council Minutes
mot Ln4 of eeptember 18, 1981
Page N no
Mayor OteWart asked the City Attorney It the Council should continue
the publio hearing.
Morris responded that was at the discretion of the Council,
Prank asked the City Attorney it the zoning could be granted and the
owner deed restrict the property to light industrial uses.
Morrie responded yes, but the City could not enforce deed
restrictions,
Mr, Sohn Davis spoke in favor of the petition stating that he was a
property owner in the area,
The Mayor then oanoelled the remainder of the public hearing,
Hopkins motion, Alford second to rotor the petition back to the
Ptanning and Zoning Commission to allow the owner to request planned
development zoning and to waive the fee, Motion carried unanimously,
C. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Weston Homes, Inc, requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural, (A) classification to the planned developmen,4 (PD)
classification on a 15,8 acre tract located on trim south side of
Audra Lane approximately i,060 feet west of Loop 28a, It approved
the planned development would permit the following land uses;
8,0 acres of single family detached land use
minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet with a
density of 5,4 units per acre
3.9 acres of dupplex or two family land use
42 units with a density of 10.7 units per acre
3.9 acres of multi-family land use
with a density of 20 unite per acre ]6U
The Mai,or opened the public hearing,
Mr, Charles Watkins, rields, Edwards and Asoociates, spoke in favor
of the petition stating that his company represented woet(in Homes.
His client was petitioning for planned development and presented
photographs of the type of single family dwelling which would be
constructed on the tract. The single family homse would ba in the
$50,000 to $60,000 price range and tha duplexes in the ti)5,0oo to
$90,000 range,
No one spoke in opposition,
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner, reported that to reply
forme had been mailed with 0 returned, One telephone call had been
received from titaff opposing the petition, The tract was located in
an area which was designated as low intensity and was a mixed
residential planned development, It does not violate the area
intensity/density standard. The proposed transition from the high
intensity and high density zoning on the adjacent tract to tho eadt,
to the single family area on this request along the west border
appeared to staff to be reasonable, Approximately 254 potential
multi-family units were approved in the adjacent PD-27.
Approximately70 multifamily were requested in this proposal, The
Denton Development Guide had previously listed the recommended
multi-family donoentrations in one continuous low intensity cluster
at from 200 to 500 unite, The rovised Guide recommended the
concentration' now be limited to 200 units, Approximately 21
two-family tots were proposed with 42 unite, as well as
approximately; 51 single family detached lots. These single tautly
lots were 6,000 square feet in size and the overall proposed density
was iii the neighborhood of 10 units per`aore. A hocdeshoo shaped
City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 18, 1954
Page Ten
intstnal public street with 60 feet of proposed eight-of-way on
Audra oo ne was presented on the zoning concept plan, Audra Lane was
an upimpcoved road designated as a . collector street on the
thoroughfare plan and 60 feet of right-of-way was required. If
approved, the developer would be responsible for all internal road
improvements, as well as tw ovements to one-half of Audra Lane for
a distance of approximately 611 feet. Additional off-site road
improvements could be imposed when planned development zoning was
requested. Former Denton Development auids policies required access
by a collector street or larger to multi-family areas In low
intenetty areas. The revised Gutde policies specified that high
densityy housing have access by ssoondary arterial or greater in low
inteneity areas, The P&z had reoommended approval with 4 conditions.
11 The Council considered adoption of an ordlnanci
appproVinn a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
alaesifioation to the planned development. (PD) classification on a
15,5 sore traot located on the south side of Audra Lan•)
approximately 1,050 feet west of Loop 288.
The following ordinance was presentsdi
NO, 84-117
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 15.8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH BIDE OF AUDRA LANI. APPROXIMATELY 1,050 FEET
WEST OF LOOP 288, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRtBRD
HEREIN: TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION
FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" CLASSIFICATION AND
USE DESIGNATIONI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Chew 'second to adopt the ordinance with the
conditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger Faye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye,"
Motion carried unanimously,
6. ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving the proposed 1984-85 fiscal year budget,
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the otty chartsr provided
that the Council must approve the appropriations ordinance no lose
than 10 days prior to the end of the (kcal year. The Council had
presented to them a budget which provided for continuing operations
of the City of Denton with no tax increase with tho exceptinn of a
proposed additional 2d levy for the purposes of inoreaetog the
Street Department operating budget. The ordinance before the
Council had been prepared after the budget session earlier in the
day and incorporated the changes which council had directed.
John MoGrans, Director of Finance, reported that the ordinance
presented had incorporated the requested changes, The front page of
the ordinance incorporated $216,000 in revenues which represented a
5% increase in sales tax. It also incorporated in the aenecai,Fund
public works area an increase of $216,000 on the expenditure side,
Also incorporated in the contributions to other agencies was
$250,000 for Flow Hospital. Under the Miscsilanaous category, a
teanposition in numbers had oocucred, The number should be
$1,240,215, The budget was not In balance, The taxes should either
be increased or deoreuss the line Items to offset the $250,000 for
Flow.
CityY aounati Minutep
Meeting of September 18, 1984
Page Rleven
Mayor Uo'!art asked staff to come back with a recommendation.
Hartung asked direction from the Council on a target number.. The
council had discussed three different numbers,
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the Council had to approve
agenda item S, the tax levy ordinance, before they could approve the
budget.
Council Member McAdams stated that the Council should at least have
in mind what they were willing to approve,
Council Member Stephens asked the Finance Director to review the
changes.
MoGrans reported that under Section 2 (Revenues) the General Fund
revenues was increased by $216,000 due to the sales tax increase,
On page 2 (Expenditures) under General Fund public works, there was
an increase of $216,000, Previous amendments to the budget to the
area of the Library, Word Processing Center, and Public Works
Department had been nootporated, Revenues had also been increased
according to the new assessed evalutkon and the interest incomewhich
had been received from the Appraisal Tax District,
Tits following ordinance was presented)
NO. 84-118
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF DENTON,
TP.XAS, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OCTOBER 1, 1984,
AND ENDING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 19851 AND DECLARING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Rlddlospoeger motion, Chew second to approve the budget as submitted
with the ohangos.
Mcarane reporter; that it would require going over the $9,75% tax
levy and would be submitted to referendum. If the Council approved
a tax rate of 580, the remainder of the budget would have to be
adjusted by $250,000, If the Counoil approved a tax rate of 59,750,
the remainder of the budget would have to be adjusted by $57,500,
council Member Riddlesperger stated that it appeared that the
Council should approve the lax levy prior to adoption of the
budget. His motion would have tCi include an adjustment of $57,500
with the City Manager being given the power to make the adjustment.
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to amend the motion to approve
the tax levy at 59.750 with the instruction to the city manager to
adjust the expenditures by subtracting $57,500 where he thought bast,
Council Membet Riddlesperget stated that the Council would be
looking at the budget through the year, They should let the people
of the city of Denton know that the Council was putting 20 in for
streets, and approximately 20 in for the hospital, The budget and
the tax levy should be adopted with one motion,
Stephene motion to amend the motion to approve the budget with the
present 560 tax rate.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that the Council still had to have
$250,000 for Flow Hospital.
Motion died for tack of a second.
Joe Morris, Acting City Attorney, reported that the ordinance
adopting the budget and the ordinance approving the tax levy had to
be considered separately,
city council Minutes
Meeting of September 10, 1984
Page Twelve
Colin oil~PMember Riddlesporger stated that the Council could not do
anything with the budget until the tax rate was Coto
Hopkins motion, Chew seaond to amend the motion to adopt a budget
that would limit the tax increase to 20, staff be directed to
postpone funds and to hold additional budget hearings in February to
review projects whtoh had been delayed.
Mayor Pro Tem Chew stated that this would include funds for Flow
Hospital.
Morris reporta4 that this would be a problem, h particular
appropriation could be completely deleted trom this budget prior to
paesagel however, there was a charter provision that the budget
could not be amended at a future date unless there was a public
emergency, an event which could not be foreseen, The budget was
meant to set the approptlationa tar the entire year. It the Council
wpte to decide that it did not want to fund all of a particular
year, funding could be provided for one-half year,
Hopkins motion, Chew second to amend the motion so that $250,000 be
deleted from the construction and cenovatton in the West Wing, Phase
11 project.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked it the purpose of Council Member
Hopkins's amendment was to eliminate 1.750 of the tax and the
$250,000 would include that difference.
Council Member Hopkins responded yes,
Morrie suggested that the Council instruct the Finance Dicectot to
make the changes and the Legal Department would prepare an ordinance
to insure that there was no misunderstanding on the figures thAt
were being voted on. A motion could bt made to amend the budget
ordinance as presented and the ordinance would be prepared And
submitted for approval later in the agenda,
Council Member Hopkins asked, if the Council could not defer
projects, what would happen if funds were encumbered and transferred
at a later date.
John Madrane reported that the appropriation did not encumber the
funds► it simply made the budget allocation foe projects. For
example, in the sales tax increaoe for the street projects, the
staff would appropriate that money but would not encumber the funds
until the time the staff felt comfortable that the revenue was to
fact coming to the City.
Mayor Stewart stated that the transfer would have to be for an
emergency.
Morris stated that the charter provision regarding emergencies was
also contained in state law, The intent wag to restrict Councils
from coming back several times during the yeac and going through the
entire budget procedure,
A vote was taken on Council Member Hopkins's amendment. On roll
call Vote, MoAdams "nay," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "n0.," Alford
"nay," Riddlespecger "nay," Chew naye," and Mayor Stewart 11nay.!,
Motion failed 5 to 2 with Council Members McAdams, Stephens, Alford,
Riddlesperger and Mayor Stewart casting the nay votes.
Council Member Riddleapergee stated that his original motion was
trying to have the Council face up to problem areas. Problems were
arising in the voting process but he believed the Council needed to
face up to their responsibilities,
MeaY council ktnutes
Meeting of September le, 1984
Page Thirteen
A vote was taken on Council Membet Rt"16eper9e " motion' on toll
call vote, Molidams "aye," Hopkins "nay," Stephens "nay," Alford
Rtddlaepecgec "aver" Chew "nay," and Mayor Stewart "nsy,"
Motion tailed 4 to 3 with Council Members Hopkins, Stephens, Chew
and Mayor Stewart casting the nay votes.
Council Member Rtddlesparger stated that it was obvious there would
have to be oompcomises.
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that he would support a 20 tax increase
which he felt would fund 'Flow Hospital and do other projects also.
The additional 1250,000 could be found to make up the diffscenoe in
the budget if the council delayed or postponed Phase and the
addition of the West Wing.
Chew motion, Riddlespetger second to raise the tax base to Sao per
$100 evaluation with Flow and staff directed to out as appropriate,
Council Member McAdams stated that since the council was determined
to give 1250,000 to Plow and had earmarked the entire 20 tax !
increase to streets, they really were talking about getting 1250,000
plus any inaceasea in these items with these funds, tf the public
reaLl did support Flow.Hospital, they would be willing to pay the
additional taxes, She did not like the prospect of citizens either
receiving the services which they had become accustomed to or having
Flow. A 1,750 increase would not cover the 1250,0001 157,500 would
still have to be foun3 in the budget. The renovations to the West
Wing- had been plannei for and she felt the project should be
funded, The public had voted no to adding a second story but had
not said no to the city trying to utilize the space which it had.
nhe wag in favor of a 3.750 tax increase,
Mayor Pro Tom Chew stated that expandicuree during the last budget
year had exceeded the amount appropriated by the bonds for the
renovations to city Hall.
City Manager Chris ltactung made a clarification comment regarding
the renovation project, Since the addition to the West Wing of the
building involved pcinoipaLly the Customer Service Diviaion, the
1110,000 in the budget was basically oatried by the Utility Fund.
If eliminated, it would not help the oeneral fund as it was in the
utility transfer, Staff felt that all of the recommendations in the j
budget were needed and required, In an attempt to comptomise, there
was funding in the utility Fund for the mapping system In addition
to the funds in the General Fund, Staff would propose to delete tho
$1000000 from the General Project Fund for the mapping program with
the understanding that the project would proceed with the money
available from the Utility Fund this year to begin the mapping,
This would be resubmitted next year to fund the General Fund portion
of the mapping program. Also, funds for street improvements ace
being increased approximately 1432,000 over the current level. A
10% reduction could be made from this project and staff would then
recommend a 590 tax rate.
John MCOrdns reported that the specific change to the ordinance
would be to reduce the Revenues on the General Project Fund by
1100,000 which would make It 1512,580; on the n,econd page under
Expenditures, the General Fund public works would be reduced by
$40,000 which would make It 13,289,4591 and reduce the Genetal Fund
Miscellaneous to 1,440,235, Total expenditures would now be
$96,805,165.
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to approve the budget with the
changes as specified by the Finance Director, On toll call vote,
McAdams ,aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens 11 nay, 11 Alfotd „aye. u
Riddleeperger "aye," Chow "aye," and Mayor. Stewart "nay," Motion
canted 5 to. 2 With council Member Stephens and Mayor Stewart
casting the nay votes,
city Coutlaii Minutes
bMeetinq of Soptember 10, I904
Page Fourteen
B, The council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving the proposed 1984-e5 fiscal year tax tats levy.
John Modrdne, Director of Finance, reported that in conjunction with
the budget appropriation ordinance which had been approved, the tax
rate would be set at 590 per $100 evaluation.
The following ordinance was preeentedt
NO, 84-119
AN ORDINANCE LEVYtNQ THE AD VALOREM TAX OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAO, FOR THE YEAR 1984, AT THE RATE OF $,59 PER
$100.00 ASSESSED EVALUATION ON ht,~ TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN
THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY JANUARY 1, 1954, NOT
EXEMPT BY LAW) PROVIDING REVENUES FOR PAYMENT OF CURRENT
MUNICIPAL EXPENSES, AND FOR INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON
OUTSTANDING CITY OF DENTON BONDS) PROVtntNO FOR LIMt TCD
EXEMPTIONS OF CERTAIN HOMESTEADS! PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT
OF COLLECTIONS) PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSEI AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance. On
roll call Vote, McAdams "aye,', Hopkins "aye," Stephens "nay," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "nay,,,
Motion carried 5 to 2 with Council Member Stephens and Mayor Stewart
casting the nay votes,
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
increasing the residential solid waste collection fee,
Assistant city Manager Rick Svehla reported that this ordinance was
requesting the residential solid waste collection fee be increased
from $6,75 per month to $8.00 and was based on revenues approved In
the new fiscal year budget,
The following ordinance was presented!
NO. 84120
AN ORDINA14OF. AMENDING CHAPTER 12, ARTICLE It, SECTION
12-19(b) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON
RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL SANITATION RATES, REPEALING AF,L
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance, On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford ,aye,,,
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously,
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
transferring unencumbered appropriation balances between funds,
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this was a routine and of
fiscal year clean up item,
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 84-121
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1983-84 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS BY INCREASING THE GENERAL PROJF,CT FUND
ACCOUNT BY THE SUM OF THIRTEEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($13,500); AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
McAdams motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. on roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye ,'1 Word 1'ay,' "
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Moti#.In
carried unanimously,
Qit Counoil Minutes
Mee inqq at dsptember 18, 1404
Page P ftean
E, The Cou„all considered adoption of an ordinance
regarding 1269M which would allow assignment pay to be paid to
training officers in the Police Department.
Kathryn Usrey, Director of personnel, reported this would authorize
the city to pay assignment pay of $60.00 to officers who train other
police offiast s.
The following ordinance was presentedf
NO. 84-122
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT PAY FOR P041CE OFFICERS
ASSIGNED TO THE FIELD TRAINING OFFICERS PROGRAM IN THE CITY
OF DENTON POLICE DEPARTMENTI 61=tNO FORTH THE AMOUNT OF
ASSIGNMENT NAY AND THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH IT IS
PAYABLE] AND DECLARINO AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
Stephens motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
ball vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins ,aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye,,, Riddlesperger "aya," Chew "aye," and Mayor Ctewart ,aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
7. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution to
amend the personnel policies cotoOrning m6dibal examinations,
overtime, compensatory time, holidays, vacation/bonus time, doath-
in-the-family leave,
Kathryn Usrey, Director of Personnel, reported that it had been
discovered that one of the policies included lit the resolution on
the agetilda needed further discussion. Usrey then distributed copies
of the revised resolution which excluded the vacation/bonus time
policy. The changes which were proposed to th~~ policies, with one
exception, were predominatly for clarification, The resolution
dealt with 5 of the 4 policies which had already been approved.
During training with supervisors, areas which needed more
clarification were found. The one policy which included a change
was the holiday policy, The vaoatton/bonus time policy would come
before Council at a later date.
The following resolution was presented;
RE B0iLNT I0N
WHEREAS, the Director of the Personnel/Employoe Relations
Department for the City of. Denton has presented proposed policies
regarding employee rules and regulations for the Council's
consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such policies as
official policies regarding employment with the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE C1TY
OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1.
The following polict6s, attached hereto and made a part
hereof, are hereby adopted as official policies of the City of
Denton, Texas:
Medical Examinations (Reference No, 102,10)
overtime (Reference No. 106.04)
Compensatory Time (Refetenae No. 106,05)
Holidays (Reference No. 107.02)
Death to the Family 06144 ence No. 111.06)
catty Council Minutol
Meetin4 of September 184 1994
page S xteen
J
SECTION I.I..
The foregoing policies are attached hereto and made a part
hereof and S MI be filed in the official records with the City
Secretary.
SECTION IIIL
The previous policies relating to Medical Examinations
(Reference No. 102.10), overtime (Reference No. 106.04),
compensatory Time (Re(erence No, 106.05)1 Holidays (Reference No.
107,02), and Death in the Family (Reference No. 111,06) adopted by
Resolution of this Council On August 21, 1964 are hereby rescinded.
S9CCTION IV,
This Resolution shall be effective from and after its date of
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of September, 1984.
RICHARD 0, BTEWAKT, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM!
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNRY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYt
McAdams motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be approved, on
roll ball vote, McAdams "Aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlespetger "aye," Ch-,d "aye,n and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion catriod unanimously.
B. The Council considered approval of a resolution
regarding 1269M which would allow the Fire Chief to appoint
individuals to the position which ranks just below the chief.
Kathryn Usrey, Director of Personnel, reported that there had been
changes in the state statutes which would allow the Fire Chief to
make an appointment to the Assistant Chief level. He may appoint
only one position.
Mayor Stewart stated that he had been appointed to, and had Served
on, this committee and had travelled the state trying to got the
legislation passed. He wished to be allowed to make the motion,
The following resolution was presented;
R E 8 0. L T I O N
WHEREAS, more than four ranks exist below that of the
position of Fire Chief in the City o! Denton Fire Department as
classified positions under Article 12691,:, V.T.C,S.i and
WHEREAS, on January 1, 1483, one person was serving in the
permanent classification of Assistant Chief immediately below that
of Firo Chief; and
Ott council,Hidutes
Mos~inl of September le, 1984
Palo Seventeen
w(ARNA84 section 8A of -W tole 12691k, V,T,G,S „ as amended
effeotive September 14 1993 authorizes tho chief of the Fire
De artment to appoint one position to the classification immedi'at,ely
below him to serve at his pleasure without Civil service protection
it such authority is contacted by resolution of the City Councl11 and
WHEREAS, it is determined to be in the beet interests of
the City to confer such authority upon the Chief of the Fire
Department[
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS:
94CTTION 1.
That the chief of the Fire Department of the City of
Denton, TeXae, be and to hereby authorized to appoint one person to
the classification immediately below him when and if a vacancy
occurs in such classification now extriting or as may be hereafter
created by ordinance of the City Counol%,
§.Fe.4"r[ON IL.L
That such person appointed by the rite Chief pursuant to
Section i hereof shall meet the minimum qualifications for such
appointment as established by Artiole 1209%, V.T.C.S. and shall
s4tvs at the pleasure of the Fire Chief without civil service
protection,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of September, 1,-14,
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTFSTi
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM1
JOE D, MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNFY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY, -
Stewart motion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved.
Mayor Pro TOM Chew presided,
Council Member Stephenil asked it this would address the issue of
promotion by coming up through the ranks.
City Manager Chris Hartung responded that the Issue was whethor or
not the testing and eligibility list requiremanta would have to bo,
used as in all other positions or whether a different type;.--
selection process could be used, which might include bringingj ~.L
someone from outside the department. It would allow the ChieL to
appoint an individual to a position just below him,
Mayor, Pro To* Chew called for the vote. On roll call vote, McAdams
"aye,,, Hopkins Haye," Stephens "nay,,, Alford "aye," Riddlesperger
"aye," Chew "nay," and Mayor Stewart "aye,,, Motion carried 6 to 2
with Council Member Stephens and Mayor Pro Tam Chew casting the nay
voter.
City coanoil Ninutoo
Meetih? of September 18, 1981
Page ghtesn
C. The Council considered approval of A resolution
regarding 1269M which would allow the Police Chief to appoint
individuals to the position which ranks just below the Oise,
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this was the same issue as
the previous resolution.
The following resolution was presented;
R E 3 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, the ranks of Captain, Lieutenant, Ssrgeant and
Police Officer exist below that of the position of chief of Police
In the City of Denton Police Department as classified positions
under Article 1269m, V.T.C.S.; and
WHEREAS, on January 1, 1983, three persons were serving in
the permanent classification of captain immediately below that of
Chief of Police; and
WHEREAS, Section 8A of Article 1269m, V.T.C.S., as amended
effective September 1, 1983, authorizes the Chief of Police to
appoint up to four persons to the classification immediately below
him to serve at his pleasure without civil service protection i.f
such authority is conferred by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, it is determined to be in the best interests of
the City to confer such authority upon the Chief of Polide;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the Chief of Police of the Police Department of the
City of Denton, Texas, be and is hereby authorized to appoint up to
four persons to the olaseifioation Immediately below him when and if
a vacancy occurs in such classification now existing or 49 may be
hereafter created by ordinance of the City Council,
SECTION ti,_
That such person or persons appointed by the Chiof of
Police pursuant to Section I hereof shall meet the minimum
qualifications for such appointment as established by Article 1269m,
V.T.C.S, and shall serve at the pleasure of the Chiet of Police
without civil service protection,
PASSFD AND APPROVED this the 18th day of September, 1984,
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEOAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF MTON, TEXAS
BY;
City Couaail MtAutee
Meetin of September 100 1984
Pale Nhoteen
Stewart motion, tw(W ams second that the resolution be approved, On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "hay,H Afford
$$aye,° Riddlespacg er "aye so Chew "nay, 00 and Mayor Stewart "aye ,H
Motion carried 6 to 2 with Council Member utephens and Mayor Pro Tom
Chew casting the nay votes,
D, The Council considered apWroval of a resolution to
transfer unencumbered appropriate balances between departments,
city Manager Hartung reported that this was another and oI the
fiscal year clean up item.
The following resolution was presentedt
R P. 8 0 L U T 1 O.N
WHEREAS, Section 8,07 of the Charter of the City of Denton
authorizes the City Council to transfer unencumbered appropriations
between general classifications of expenditures within an office,
department or agency; and
WHEREAS, the City Managet deems it necessary to transfer
the funds as specified belowi NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT PESOLVND BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TRXASt
SECTION I,
These funds shall be transferred as followst
EM ACCOUNT NO, TO ACCOUNT N0, MgM
Data Processing 100-n04-0017 Word Ptooesaing 100.003-0006 $ 36,111
Public Works/ 100-002-0010 Finance Admin,/ 100-004-020M 100,000
Engineering Miscellaneous
Police/CID 100-007-0041 Finance Admin./ 100-004-020M 25,000
Miacellanaous
Data Processing 100-004-0017 Finance/Customer 100-004-0022 t_58,OOC,
Serviee
TOTAL TRANSFER $219,311
SECTION II,
This Resolution shall become effective from and after its date
of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of September, 1984.
RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEdAL FORM:
JOE 1), MORRIS, ACTINQ CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I3Y t
Cit Council Minutes
M**L Aq Ot SeptembeC 16, 1904
Page Twenty
Riddlespecgor lotion, McAdams second that the resolution be
appicovedd, On roll call voto, McAdams "aye, Hopkins "aye," Stephens
"aye," Alford "aye,lt Riddlesperger "A e,,, Chew "aye," and Mayor
Stewart "ays,ll Motion carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered approval of a resolution for a
proposed easement/license, Tract F-664, Lewleville Lake, Texas from
the U. a. Army Corps of Engineers,
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this was a routine
resolution accepting an easement license from the Corps of Engineers
acceptinq the sewer line which ran from the Hickory crook Mobile
Home Park to the Hickory Crook Lift Station. The Corps required a
resolution to accept the easement.
The following resolution was ptesontedi
A-&60LUT 1 ON
WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas wishes to acquire a
license and easement for the installation and waintenance of a
sanitary sewer line in, along and acrose property owned by the
United Stated and
MHSREAS, the United States has agreed to grant a licenue
and easement for such use pursuant to the provisions of the license
and easement agreements copies of which are attached hereto=
NOW, THEREFORE, Hg IT RESOLVED BY THE COuNctu or THE CITY
OF UENTON, TEXASi
SECTION 1.
That the city Manager of the City of Denton, Texas to
hereby authorized to execute the necessary license and easement
agreements, copies of which are attached hereto, with the Department
of Army on behalf of the Clty of Denton, to allow the city to
install and maintain a sanitary sewer line in accordance with the
tetme and provisions therein contained on, in and along the property
therein desoribod.
SECTION It.
This Resolution shall be effective from and after its date
of passage and approval.
PASSED AND ~7PROVED this the 18th day of September, 1984,
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTRST:
CIiARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LtaAL FORMt
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Stephens motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. on
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye,l' Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Rid,dlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayot Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously,
City Council Minutes
Meeting of September 11, 1984
Page Twenty-One
F. The Council considered ap roval Of a to aoo4i,ting a grant from the Federal Avlatfon Administration in the
amount of 1466,000 and authorizing the City Manager to execute the
grant agreements,
Sill Angelo, Assistant to the Director of Public Works, reported
that the FAA had offered the City the money and the City was ready
to take it.
The following resolution was presented%
h E 8 0 L U T I Qx
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has submitted to the Federal
Aviation Administration an application for Federal Assistance dated
September 6, 1984, for a grant of Federal funds for a project far
development of the Denton Municipal Airport; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has approved a
project tot development of the Airport consisting of the
construction of approximately 18,000 square yards of aircraft
parking apron, construction and marking of a connecting taxiway;
improvements r>f drainage system, and the installation of two lighted
supplementol wind cones; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration has submttted to
the City of Denton a Qtant offer in the amount of 1468,600 for the
construction of such improvements;
NOW, THEREFORE, Aft RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTON. TEXAS,
SKCTION I .
That the City of Denton hereby accepts the Grant Offer and
agrees to comply with all of the assurances and conditions contained
in the Grant Application and the Grant Offer, and the City Manager
of the City of Denton or hie designee is hereby authort2ed to
execute such agreements.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of September, 1984.
RICHARD O. BTEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST,
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LtGAL FORMI
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYl
Hopkins motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved, On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye,',
Motion carried unanimously.
8. The Council considered the final award of Did * 9328 to
Atkins Brothers Conotruction Company in the amount of 1460,129.80.
aitY Caan9il minutes
Mee ing a eptember le, 1964
page Twenty-'l'ira
Sill A119410, Assistant to the Dlrw or of Publio works, toy Ot ted
that aow`that the city had the money, we were ready to spend ft an4
reoommended to award the bid.
Hopkins motion. Chew seoond to approve the final award of Did 09328
to Atkins Brothers Construatlon Company, Notion Carried unanimously,
9. There was no ottioiai action on Executive session of legal
matters, real estate, personnel, or board appointments,
10. No items of new business toe future agendas were suggested.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned,
RICHARD 0, STEWART, MAYOR
CHARLOTTE ALLRN, CITY SERETARY
I~
i
04901
City Council Minutes
September 26, 1984
The Council convened into a' Special Called Mooting at 7:00 p,m, on
Tuesday, September 25, 1984 in the Council Chambers.
M6MBE S
PkE$ Tr Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tom Chew; Council Members
Alford, 14CAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
City 4anagoe, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary
MEMBERS
ABSENTr Council Member Hopkins was absent due to an illness In
his family
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of July 3, 1984 and the Special Called PAseting of
July 10, 1984.
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to approve the 1inutes as
presented. Action carried unanimously,
2. The Council considered authorizing First Southwest Company
to submit a proposal for purchase of city of Denton, Texas Utility
System Revenue Bonds, Series 198,1-A.
City Manager Chris Hartung repported that becaus First Southwest
Company was -tue financial advisor- to the city, the Council would
need to authorize their bidding on bonds,
Mr, Frank ,Modanich, representing first Southwest Company, stated
that his firm had submitted for Council approval a letter which
would authorize First Southwest to submit a bid on these bonds.
Tne were a member of one of the groups which would be bidding. The
authorization was to fulfill a requirement of state statutes,
Council Member Stephens stated that tae bonds were being authorized
to raise revenues for the utilities; He was in favor of raising
revenues but not in tais fashion. He believed this was contrary to
the City Charter and felt an election should be called,
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to authorize First Southwest
Company to submit a proposal for purchase of City of Denton, Texas
Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series 1984-A, Motion carried 5 to 1
with Council Member Stephens casting the nay vote,
3, The Council received and tabulated bids for the purchase of
City of Denton, Texas Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series 1984-A.
Mr, Frank 14edanicn, First Southwest Company, opened the bids, The
Tabulation Sheet is attached to and made a part of then+e ;11nutes,
Trio Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal
matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments while the
bids were being tabulated. No official action was taken.
The Council then reconvened into the Special Called Meoting.
Ar, Frank Medanich reported that all bids were correct and First
Southwest Company recommended awarding the bid to Rauscher, Pierce
and Refsnes.
1Ar, Paul Horton, representing the bond counsel AcCall, Parkhurst and
Horton, reported that toe bond counsel had reviewed and checked the
bids and would also recommend Rauscher, Pierce and Refsnes. The
approval of the ordinance would accomplish the entire transaction.
I.,, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing
the issuance of City of Denton Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series
1984-A, and spproving and authorizing instruments and procedures
relating thereto,
h ~ ha r'Int Cry, 000 Msi OMW QsiIIM Oa WWO OWbh TOM MI
TABULATION OIL RIDS
RACEIVED AT SALE OF
$20,000,000
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
(Denton County)
UTILITY SYSTEM REYENUE BONDS, SERIES 1984.A
Selling Tuesday, September 25, 1984, at 7100 PM, CDT
GROSS LESS NET WECTiYE
ACCOUNT MANAGER INTEREST COST PREMIUM INTEREST COST INTEREST RAT
l /U, ~9~s1G
C~ 2a , /to qp f
1
Cit Council Minutes
AOO~ing of September 25, 1984
Page Two
14r Roland L'dney, Chairperson of the Public Utilities Board, stated
that the bids had been reviewed and the board would also recommend
the award to Rauscher, Pierce and Refsnes,
Tiis following ordinance was presented;
NO, 84-122A
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF CITY OF DENTON
UTILITY SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS SERIES 1984,A, AND APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING INSTRUMENTS ACID PROCEDURES RELATING THERETO
Council Momber Stephens asked if this procedure were illegal, would
the bond counsel assume the liability,
Mr, Paul Horton, representing McCall Parkhurst, and Horton
responded that his firm had an opinion from the Attorney General s,
office which stated that the City Charter was In conflict with state
statutes,
McAdams motion, Riddlesperger second to adopt the ordinance, On
roll call vote, McAdams aye, Stephens nay, Alford aye,
RiddlesperggOr "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion
carried 5 Eo 1 with Council Aomber Stopnens casting the'
he nay vote.
The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss legal
maters real estate, personnel, and board appointments, NO
of cial action was taken,
with no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned,
RICHARD 0, Sl RT `MATUR
CHAKLOI ALLEN,
CITY 5tUKEIAKY
15840
CITY COUNCIL AaINDA
RACK-Up SUMMARY 31U6T
MBRTINO DATh; December 18, 1984
SUBJECT; Approval of Allan Estates Mobile Nome Park Amended Site Plan
(5-165)
SUMMARY; This 39,3 sore site was approved as a specific use permit for a
225 unit mobile home park in May oe 1983. A final site plan
was approved in November of 1983, The new owner wishes to
amend the approved site plan, The proposed changes are as
follows;
1. The 1,0 acre vehicle and boat storage area previously
located In a 60' utility easement diagonally traversing the
park has been moved to a square shaped area in the south-
eastern corner of the park.
2. The southernmost street in the park featuring a creek
crossing has been changed to a cul-de-sac and the creek
crossing has been eliminated,
3. The center street in the park has been closed at its western
and and changed to a cul-de-sac.
4. The office location has been moved to the end of the above
mentioned cul-de-sac and a pool and play area have been
added to that site,
5. The lots bordering the creek have been removed and the creek
has been added to the recreation area,
6. The street traversing the park diagonally has been
eliminated and that area is now listed as open area on the
site plan,
ACTION RKQUIRED; Approval of site plan
RECOMMSNDAT1oN; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the
site plan for Allan Estates Mobile Home Park,
ALTERNATIVESt Approval or denial of site plan
ATTACHMENTi Reduced site plan
yip
Den so Spi ey
Development Review Planner
05013
Y lMYlww 11 , I~ful.w.^JM.
NII
'Y~~',r„, ..H1 1 MM I.« ~.1 Mr 11 1~'lrY•
' n~en ~ j \ N
..NN 11, ~ N.+1. N I♦ I~, Ir1N~ •1! tMM N MN ~wr M MN •1Y 1 •,11 NYII Y1 ~1 ,+11. • fN
Of 4
p rl . • t r. "f~ i
-40
444
I 11 vI X , ',I r , ,R I J!
I
{ r q I I
I I , ` I I
y 1 I
J d d ~ rr
1 p S 1 11 x y ~r ~
......r _ ~ i. 1~ firer , 1...-«.. 4.. W....
ALLAN ESTATES M091Lk- Hd. „ I + ~R
aa,.•,. ' dHKfY.
r ~ r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December lb, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of Garner
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0,582 acres situated south
of and abutting the service road of the I-35E
and west of FM Highway 2181 (Teasleyy Dane),
The site is zoned general retail (GK) and
general retail type of development is
anl: icipated .
Water, sewer, electric, telephone and gas
service and facilities are adequate and
available. There is need however, for a
sidewalk to be provided alongg the service road
of I-35E. Only one access will be allowed off
the service road of I-35E but if the developers
agree to share access with the adjacent lots
then not more than two accesses will be allowed.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of preliminary plat of the Garner Addi-
tion, Lot 1, Block 1, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Only one access will be allowed on the
service road of I-35E but if access is
shared with adjacent lots then not more
than two accesses will be allowed,
2. A sidewalk is to be provided on the service
road of I-35E.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Harry , ersau
Development Review Planner
J
Nord r"*F I! AMINw AY
/lit" AIOtAN Og*f4
llo.
1f VWNITY MIA►
IFf-35E 1 SCALSt low 2010
I1
• r
w
: 1 _ ►1►MN• ow to t1HflM IYMIMS
8743dE 173. K. 0 W to 43"01" rim ll.w111
ro
J4G~4 'N err JOAtNlafO Nttw *ANh
Glvpr,t i6'.C P GfV1'L0I¢t rb ANSrA4L A"
V"'-' z ~1i rvcAACAWTV L'si-t 0A4omrpor ko
RIW14 v-s to YNE Alrl$71VA MANJOLor~7vA&
dvAL~ 0.114e lAWWt I4,04,4- oy Otj%IA71r 4~1N06t
AV,HP LIR7• JtAn" rjEM YNK 904LJN! 70 VC .vEW
MAtNNeL t5 ,
WO PAL NOTtSI
O w rr1N tMne1T Nwttrwuul MA1NL
L N1leturT Nnlf Itw CtMOMW
' LOO I~ ~ Aft 9A41 It SOON X*WCKTWMI
ADDITION
MbTT lWMMMNwtM. NMtt
W.S. NUMMtLL1 Ott
1
N -e3d E 173, PRELiWNARY PLAT
k GARNER ADDITION
OANY JAMES NNYNt OABf! ACNt IN JHN "AMANDt1M MOIL WIWtY
IN"C1TY AND COUW" OF DENTOMI TEXAS
OWNtNSI W.L. ANO MAMRY FNANCES OANgEN
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE; December 18, 1964
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of the
Smith Hill Addition
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 4.76 acres situated west of
and abutting U.S. Hwy 377 (Fort Worth Drive) and
south of And abutting Collins Street, and more
fully described as Smith Hill Addition, Block A,
Alexander Hill Survey Abstract Number 623. The
site is covered by a planned development district
(PD-81) and the proposed preliminary plat is for
office and restaurant development.
Access will be allowed as shown. The existing
fire flow is 1870 S.p.m. which is over the 1500
g.p.m, rsquired. The existing sewer system is
overloaded, and development cannot be undertaken
until capital improvement works are. completed.
There is need for a study to determine whether
a parallel sewer line may bo installed by the
developers, City will enter a pro rata agree-
ment for off-site utility works. Water, sewer,
electric, telephone, and commercial solid waste
disposal services and facilities are adequate
and available.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the Smith Hill Addition preliminary
plat with the following condition;
The retail /restaurant complex will be allowed to
tie onto the existing sanitary sewer.line but the
kitchen wastewater operations of the restaurant
is to be confined to the hours of 12:00 noon to
4;00 m, and frum 6;00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. This
time limitation will be applicable until capital
improvement works are undertaken to upgrade the
sanitary sewer system along Eagle Drive.
CC Baok-Up
Smith Hil Addition
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approval of tho preliminary plat with or
withot;t conditions
2. Denial of the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
P- N P:" C~tL.Ck.
Harryy ~ ersud
Development Review Planner
NfvflAMO Jf •111 •.MI 1111.Y11 M. 11'Y•MHI~T.I.I~MV 11
1; .1
l~ I ,l1 M•, . .1 3 ~ t Ili ,1 e.~'4 .1 ~r 1 Ala
V ~ r.1 • ~ rra~~i {•ii trill
~ 'val 1 1 1
r~
1
j{ J
lif!
1
p V M
4
S
I
w
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
RACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December 18,. 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary replat of, the
Veterans Addition, Lots 4A and 4B
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 0,367 acres situated north
of and abutting Lindsey Street and west of and
abuttingg McCormick Street and being a replat
of Lot 4, Revised Veterans Addition, Tompkins
Survey, Abstract 7A1246, The site is zoned
residential (SF'-7, the purpose of the replat
is to create anot11ler single family residential
lot.
Water, sewer, telephone, electric services and
facilities are adequate and available, The
preliminary re plat conforms to the requirements
of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary replat of the
Veterans Addition, Lots 4A and 4B.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary replat
A'T'TACHMENT: Reduced map
(1
arr ersau
Development Review Planner
i
LOT 22
'83499 t~=.-. :=~_._r_•=--.^•• 96.82
. • "+CONC~t Ff"-V10RM-^CHA - . •
^`-30_DRNO ESMT _ -
0
.h ~~PPy\y
h LOT ~4 9' h 4~ Qa'
F'!ZO POS i:' D \rQO fah'
FF £61 ti3 -4
7200 SQ. FI,
l'- w w
Z OAAVEL DRIVE WOOD OAAAOE CHAIN LINO FENCE
W 3 LOT 3
_ N to LOT 4 A
MAY 0.367 AC. M
(ONol
IO z
_ 6600
SQ. F1,
O COA MICK ion/d SF-7
0
z (7
H z ~.~rre~r.
N [GB9/
X
W
F.X. - - E ---100~._.~._.~.-♦--.
EXISTING 6" WATERMAIN
- - - 6,60 ,0
Mc CORMiCK---_----STREET
60, Row.
I
i
VH
EXISTING 81I SANITARY SEWER
PRELIMINARY REPLAI
LOTS 4A and 48
REVISED
VETERANS ADDITIONS
being a ReDlof of LOT 4, REVISED VETERANS ADDITION.
in the A48. TOMPKINS SURVEY A- 1246
CITY and COUNTY OF' DENTON, TEXAS -DM F'KIN S
CFO V
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUi4MARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: Denember 18, 1984
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of lot 5,
block C, Westgate Nark Addition, 1st Addition
SUMMARY; 'Phis is a .964 acre tract located at the
southwest corner of F'ladger Drive and Westgate
Drive. Tho property is zoned single family
(SF'-16) and single family detached land use is
proposed,
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered
a request for a variance of perimeter street
paving requirements and standard provisions
requiring the extension of water and sewer
across the full width of one face of the
property, The Planning and Zoning Commission
denied the request for pperimeter street paving
and water variances. The sewer requirement was
waived because there are grade problems. The
developpers have now agreed to post a bond for
perimeter street paving.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of preliminary plat subject to ppost-
ponement of perimeter street paving at this time.,
ALTERNATIVE; Approve plat with or without condition
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
11a-rry ersau y
Development Review Planner
4A
t
►
h h to 1 1 B1 eft < i
r ~ e[1I0A!( 0499 11811 1001/rON N
1/ to o k n L
h c h 1121111 rt9 tear Ro .•ar
R Y N 10111 1+ i1 n \ .
y h
ry q • N 00'27 10" Y 200 91'
iu •
r (d rJr1u .rryl. Iafl V4A~
r ~
.J Y
l f
N ~ n
$ ~ ~ M d S ! A
~ r r e e
n
a ~ 1 r N 4 .
~ C
M b i a tt' ~ O f i '21~•l~,f f.
n ` I w 1 u'
~ r try ( ~ ~ ~ ` ~ a
t+ v
y 1' • ? •1
.9Q + .rr+tl i~nY. 10012 [Ci ~ 1
00'20'1 t't 20010'
i ~51 ~ ro . r.r1 a araaae 1 evil.
a ~ A A
1A t~ lust a
C ~ v
497
3~ ~L
1 Aga"•
f 3 77zzzz
n°e C OO~O~
~p7 C d 4 j l9 w ~r n~ St g ~'n.1 ,•yY
Ord, p 3 z s 4spx~ ark ~Ee~
wirer<or 7rZ
UN•fifa 111 O x ~ax3 r i+~ e6R y~r.': Y7~~3'
► a n s S o
7"»
H
M y2
Cot! Y COUNCIL AGENDA
HA,~tc-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December 18, 1984
suBj ECT: Approval of the preliminary plat of The
Woodlands and Oaks of Township II Addition
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 33.355 acres of land situated
west of and abutting Colorado Boulevard and north
of San Jacinto Doulovard. The area is co°.,arod by
planned development (PD-6j for residential single
family cluster housing and greenbelts. Minimum
lot size for single familyy lots is established
by the PD and should not be less than 80 feet by
120 feet.
Electric service is available, There is need
for a study to ensure that adequate sewer
capacity is available to serve the area.
Drainage easement is to be provided along
Colorado Boulevard. Drainage facilities are
to be consistent with FEMA stipulations,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of preliminary plat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval of the preliminary plat of The Woodlands
and Oaks of Township II Addition, subject to the
condition that 18 inch sanitary sewer lines tire
extended to serve the development. City will
participate in oversizing and City will install
18 inch sanitary sewer line to co:inect South
Texas Industrial Park to Colorado Boulevard.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of preliminary plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced preliminary plat
N . aA~
Harry ersau
Development Review Planner
\ S 1 r , 1 '0'1141 -
~ I
~1l1( as .Ot A • : '..j
f
\ a r. 4 r~~,ld,~), F~{~c, 1 1 1•..,. ~ 11:+ J._ a~r.P~c' - ~ J
' tl r w
1 I1 Y , 1\ t 1, ! 1 1
Iii l ~ 1
I
_VII
~11 ( ,71
} ~A) 'J Z\h S. SI /,'ll 1 i 4',~ \y `1 r~ ~..qr}d f A+ ~`(r 1 r'll I(:,~ Ilt ` r i s~/ '
\ ~r ft}l II Lulf 4 r1 H UP ' 1r i 1' =1W.~ 1, !
~J ll~ }I T~(r ~I),Frrl~~lfy Ori :~Vl k,+1 ` 1~/Pr'~+, ~.r.
\ 4 'f If/ 4f-'~
A flflfl . 1 1 ~ I~ 1
, `I~~ W it ~ { a
d \ / ~1/ dcro.fA F f~ { 1 / r1 I, V \~r yy~~ y~l ~ \r~1 1. ~ ~9P r ~1 'p( }
' lD D rl ~ / % 1~~I ! ~ ,.1 ~ q /~'L 1 ~~1 1~,( L• r%.' r ~ 1 I
~ \ J ~ + ,S f:c ~ / . ~ ~ a\ l ~ 'ate\~ ~ ~i.(.r. l ~ ~ ~
1 f'1 / / ~ ~ ( \ t 1 '1''' l'r FM\ MNwr w 411M1 V IW 1 r~ Y YlY
! 1' 1 A 1) r W wul w r. 1Ir
' iw nr rr'Y~t4i1' PlI Ar IN 4. ).W~F
'rf' i ) C mfr 'nM) 1 .4.IfksY
.1{ 1rN rrrrrrllM.NLFYr ♦,.NA
1 ~ r.I.rll Mlir ar.• nl. r ~ 1Vr ~f~ \ ! ~ 4 1
block% OF 'CE r, 5+d6 p~ `3 a 1 w„ r , '
IOC d.! r
\I 7 r ) tG.4 ALA! W Am lp-A, iN: WN)Lfi[ri d ~.t
1$%T ,,(l~~M4 I=,!x,
(NNL (C~! Jf A(Ydk
1 f AU<y .u)rW w16I.
!`J N Nae<u . r.L 1,A1 wet(.
J tP . ! L r. f MNTV '~<.(Y d 1-1 1 r ".1 SA", 4
I -too OMt^)L4
1 1{
drr,a;i,~w
. _ I ' ...+1 Ail)
RESOLUTIONS
FROM
PARENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
SAM HOUSTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DCNTON, TEXAS
1984.05 SCHOOL YEAR
RESOLUTIONS;
In order to enhance the safety of the children traveling to and
from Sam Houston Elementary School in Denton, Texas, the Parent
Teacher Association of that school would like to propose that the
Denton City Council and the Denton Board of Education adopt the
following resolutions which suggest that:
1. A method of informing appropriate school personnel be developed
in order to provide principals of affected buildingg : adequate
warning that a construction project is imminent which will
make pas+seige for children hazardous. Such a warning should
also include specific information as to the designated
personnel responsible for directing children around such
hazards,
2. Additional marked crosswalks and crossing guards are needed
along Hobson, Lane, Development of,the areas from which children
are required to cross Teasley Lane also need fairly constant:
monitoring to determine the necessity of additional marked
crosswalks and crossing guards in that area. It is also suggested
that consideration be given to the feasibility of a pedestrian
overpass 6t the current Teasley Lane crossing site,
3. The current path connecting Pennsylvania Avenue with Teasley Lane
over which all children from the Southridge area must pass
should be appropriately widened to handle the volume of bicycle
and pedestrian traffic on this artery, Additional safety
personnel should be provided to patrol the wooded area before
and after school, We recommend one guard at each end of the path
and one guard in the middle,
4. We recommend that Teasley Lane be widened in the immediate future
and that immediate steps be taken and consitently pursued to lower
the speed limit in front of the school to twenty miles per hour and
to thirty-five miles per hour for appropriate sections preceding the
twenty mile per hour section. We will lend our assistance in the
necessary effort required to,accomplish this goal,
S. We recommend that appropriate steps be taken to further guarantee
the coordination' between city and school officials regarding
safety issues, construction hazards, forecasting increased
enrollment as it relates to increased congestion of traffic
patterns, schools,,etc,
1
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHOET
MEETING DATE; December 18, 1984
SUBJECT: bold a public hearing regarding the proposed
voluntary annexation of 31,027 acres located at
the southwest corner of [cyan Road and Teasley
Lane (FM 2181) - (A-8)
PI)MMARY; The Planning and Community Development Depart-
ment has received a voluntary annexation
petition for the above subject 31,027 acre
tract, The owner of the tr4ct, Mr, B, L.
Archer, has submitted a change of zoning request
which if approvod will permit 17 acres of single
faintly land use, 10 acres of multi-family
cluster housing, and four acres of general
retail and neighborhood service land use, The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval of the change in zoning request at its
meeting of October 24, 1984, The Planning and
zoning commission change in zoning recommendation
cannot be forwarded to the City council until
after final annexation action is taken. Staff
has determined that final annexation action can
be taken by the City Council at its meeting of
February 19, 1985,
RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATrVES: 1, Approve request and continue process
2. Deny request
EXHIBITS; 1, Map
2. Service plan
3. schedule
4. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0925a
li z I
~l13 3 •a 'f2 v S f-tea `1. v. v.~• ~4 n. 1
333 ~ I ~p ~ ~ I f
1 M4 11~ \ \ ' n/
IM F' _+y_
_ J
j
f;
QMK a
X • n - 111
~h
u ~ 141 f _ / \ \ , ^ , t) ,.,J
fjo.
d V
t~M
A
R D
J 71•
00
iM;j ~k.. Il b ^ 1 e
30
,
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 0704 as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area whi`ot, 's bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW; THrREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1, Pursuent to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and oth er
routine police services, using present personnel
and 6quipm6nt, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic: signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore its established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C, Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, anal
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D, Sewer
(1) Pxopertieo in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A'of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vidod within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one moitth after the effective
date of annexation,
77
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F, streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major inprovements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city,
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now proVided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H, Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J, Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K, Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of ',)enton for
electric power,
f
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
Le Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital. Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as;
(i) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be c,o longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
is : r _
A"8
REV1S80 ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items
November 130 1984 Submit agenda aack-up
*November 101 1984 City Council sets dare, time ana
s place for public hearing
November 21, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
November 23, 1984 publish notice
November 260 1984 Submit agenda item
November 27, 1984 submit agenda back-up
*December 04, 1984 City Council holds public hearing
• December 050 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
December 07, 1984 Publish notice y «~,•t-
December 10, 1984 Submit agenda item
December 11, 1,984 Submit agenda bacK-up
*December 18, 19x4 City Council holds public nearing
December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item
January 02, 1985 submit agenda bacK-up
*January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January 10, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance
February 111 1985 submit agenda item
10ebruary 12, 1985 5ulwit agenda uack-up
*February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council
0832g
P Q Z Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 7
C. Make a recommendation to the City Council on the
pproposed closing of the intersection of Wye and
Robertson streets,
Mr. Clark stated Wye and Robes son Streets run parallel
asp to the railroad crossingg at, the minor areet of a
small hill, He stated Jackson Street also comes into
the intersection lose than 501 to the soot. The end
result of all these streets ooming together at a rail-
road crossing on a small crept makes proper intersection
desi n very difficult. He a-aced they did not arrive at
a de ign that would meet AASTO at+~ndar4so city subdivi-
sion regulations, or good engineering practice. There-
fore, we are recommendin the current connection of Wye
and Robertson at the railroad tracks be closed, Another
railroad crossing exists at Morse and Hill Street only
400 feet to the south. Wye Street, which is nor iuawvily
traveled runs directly to this crossing. He further
stated the work if approved will be accomplished through
the CDBG Robertson Street pr4jecr, A4 a small costs sav-
ing from leaving the connection,
Mr, LaPorte made a motion to recommend the, proposed
closing of the intersection of Wye and Robertson
Streets, Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried
(5-0)
D. rMaks a recommendation to the City Council regarding
the proposed voluntary annexation of 31,027 acres
located at the southwest corner of Ryan ,'toad and
Teasley Lane (PM 7.181) (A-8).
P' Mr, Ellison stat,id this is a voluntary annexation
petition for 31,1127 acres located at the southwest
l corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (PM 2181), He
stated the owrw of the tract, Mr, B,L, Archer, has
submitted a change of zoning request which if approved
will permit l7 acres of single family land use, 10 acres
of multi-family cluster housing, and four acres of
general retail and neighborhood service land use, He
further stated the Planning and Community Development
Department recommends approval of this annexation
request,
Mr, LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of the
proposed voluntary annexation of 31,027 acres located at
the southwest corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane,
Seconded by Mr, Claiborne and unanimously carried (5-0),
E. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed annexation of approximately 5 acres of
land located north of Highway 380 west and adjacent
and west of Masch Branch Road (A-9)•
Mr, Ellison stated staff has received a preliminary plat
of a proposed five acre office development which is a
portion of a 69 acre parcel owned by T'ri-Steen Struc-
Cures, Inn, The preliminary plat of the Tri-Steel
Headquarters Addition (five sore office site) has been
reviewed and accepted by the Development Review Cowait-
tee and approved by resolution of the City Council,
He stated sue to the lo6ation of this property in
relation to the 1) enton'Municipal Airport, the
Development Review Committee requested submission of
a general development' plan for the entire parcel, He
stated it has been the practice of the City Council
CITY COUNCIL MIENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SH8ET
MEETING DATE: Decemoer 18, 1984
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing concerning the proposed
annexation of approxiimately 5 acres of land
located north of Highway 380 West and adjacent
and west of Masch Branch Road (A-9)
SU14MARY: The Planning and Community Development
Department has received a preliminary plat of a
proposed five acre office development which is a
portion of a 69 acre parcel owned by Tri-steel
Structures, Inc. The preliminary plat of the
Tri-Steel Headquarters Addition (five acre
office site),has been reviewed, and accepted by
the Development Review Committee and approved by
resolution of the City Council,
Due to the sensitive location of the Tri-Steel
property in relation to the Denton Municipal
Airport, the Development Review Committee,
requested submission of a general development
plan for the entire parcel. As explained in the
attached letter, definite plans for the entire
69 acre tract have not been formulated. It has
been the practice of the City Council and the
Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend
annexation of parcels in the region of the
municipal airport that are experiencing
development activity. An airport master plan
effort is currently' underway and staff is
continuing its policy of encouraging
developments in proximity to the airport that
have little future liability potential insofar
as height, noise, or other potentially negative
-onsiderations are concerned,
The City Council considered the annexation
question at its meeting of October 16, 1984.
Staff was directed to initiate formal annex-
ation proceedings for the entire 69 acres,
Tri-Steel Structures, Inc, has cooperated with
annexation efforts to date and has expressed a
Council Agqenda Back-Up (A~-9)
December 4, 1984
Page Two
SUMMARY desire to have its prelimina.Ky and final plat
(continued.}; approved p"-4or to final action in February#
1985. The intent is to begin development on the
five acre office site immediately, Although not
zoned, `S`ri-Steel Structures, Inc, has agreed to
a maximum height of two stories for the proposed
offioe use.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES: 1, Approve request and continue process
2. Deny request
EXHIBITS: 1, Map
2. Service Plan
3. Schedule
4. Minutes of Planning and zoni:,g Commission
ti
r~ 1
David Ellison
Senior Planner
0530s
C r ! H + i
f !
» ` • ' Jam' /i \ ~w
s Y
f n
Ill I ,
r
,.ULJ~Jl~.~. ••~t•
gig (ID
r,." i rY
r
r Its.1
?j gtatia; # #s~# tai ~'~~I T^a~
1 •w }j e s r n
"ff r y H p JJ11
4. A.
i5q r
A' 0
;10 All, Jul
Ica rn 3 a
g P0 r r3} a a a ~.r !Fa:~ lF sz,
~
A
o _ f ,gig # !g r gt ~d,g ~ltrr
M
• p i • fit » p
r . »
s r`
CM)
r1l
~ » r.. r
I s }}j
46
1? 1
w
A fie ~t
( 1
so" our"
•1M L N Lord BURKE ENGINEERING Psblo RuWD
OONtULTINO CIVIL 10141Ned"s
20 Sept 1984
Mr. David Ellison
Senior Planner
City of Denton, Texas
RE: Tri-Steel Addition
General Davelopment Plan
Dear David:
The enclosed information is consistent with our'underaf:anding of what the
Subdivision Regulations' require for a General Development Plan. We have
talked to our client about the specific land uses they anticipatel how-
ever, it is very difficult to plan for the whole 69 acres, since owner-
ship could change before development occurs.
We have studied the Denton Development Guide, which shows Low Intensity
land use for this area. Nevertheless, our client believes that Office
Zoning blends harmoniously with the surrounding Moderate to High Intensity
land use projected for this area in the Guide, and has asked us to pursue
Office Zoning for at least the S acre lot shown inaide the 69 acre tract
of land.
We believe that due to the unpredictability in the development of the whole
69 acre tract, committing to specific land uses could inhibit the devel-
opment potential of this property. Therefore, we propose Light Industrial
use for the remaining portion of this property, because we regard it as
the highest intensity use likely to occur here.
The drainage calculations have been modified to reflect the input from the
City Engineering Office,
Please contact us if we may furnish additional information.
Sinc,orely,
,
1
pabl o
404 i. CARROLL OLVD. * 102 4017) %4-0714 DENTON* TEXAS 76101
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTONi TEXAS
WHEREAS, ArtIole 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior tcf passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEI,W, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is. hounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS;
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
1. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police' services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B, Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C, Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the a:inexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the cede of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation,
1
Service 'Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F, Streets
(1) ftot,ggency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
ohuukholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
0. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc,, on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric, power.
Servioe Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneoue
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plats that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of_pproblems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and `professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CTP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation r,rea will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city,
1
A-9
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
November 11, 1964 Submit agenda items
November 13, 1984 Submir, agenda back-up
*November 2U, 1964 City Council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
November 21, 1964 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
November 23, 1964 Publish notice
November 2b, 1964 Submit agenda item
November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*December 04, 19b4 City Council holds public hearing
December 05, 1964 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
December U7, 1964E Publish notice
December 10, 19'4 Submit agenda item
December 11, 1964• Submit agenda hack-up
*December 16, 1984 City Council holds public nearing
December 31, 1964 Submit agenda item
January 02, 1965 Submit agenda back-up
*Jatiuary 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January 10, 1985 ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance
February 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*February 190 1985 final action by City Council
P & 4 Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 7
C. Make a recommendation to the City Council on the
F roposed closing of the intersection of Wye and
obertson streets.
Mr, Clark stated Wye and Robertson Streets run parallel
up to the railroad crossingg at the %ainor crest of a
small hill. He stated Jackson Street also comes into
the intersection less than 501 to the east. The end
result of all these streets coming together at a rail-
road crossing on a small crest makes proper intersection
design vary difficult. He stared they did not arrive at
a design that would meet AASTO standards, city subdivi-
sion regulations, or good enginoerino practice. There-
fore, we are recommending the current connection of Wye
and Robertson at the railroad Cracks be closed. Another
railroad crossing exists at Morse and Hill Street only
400 feet to the south. Wye Street, which is not heavily
traveled runs directly to this Browsing, He further
stated the work if approved will be accomplished through
the CDBO Robertson Street pro)oo t at a small costs sav-
ing from leaving the connection.
Mr, LaPorte made a motion to recommend the proposed
closing of the intersection of Wye and Robertson
Streets. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried
(5.0).
D. Make a recommendation to the City Council regarding
the proposed voluntary annexation of 31.027 acres
located at the southwest corner of Ryan Road and
Teasley Lane (FM 2181) (A-8),
Mr, Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
petition for 31,027 acres located at the southwest
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181). He
stated the owner of the tract, Mr. B.L. Archer, has
submitted a change of zoning request which if atn)vovad
will perwit 17 acres of single family land use, 10 aars-j
of multi-family cluster housing, and four acres of
general retail and neighborhood service land use, He
further stated the Planning and Community Development
Department; recommends approval of this annexation
request,
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval of the
proposed voluntary annexation of 31,027 acres located at
the southwest corner rr a Road and Teasley Lane.
Seconded by Mr. Clai,orne and unanimously carried (5-0).
E, (Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed annexation of approximately 5 acres of
land located north of Highway 380 west and adjacent
and west of Maach 3ranch Road (A-9).
Mr, Ellison stated staff has received a preliminary plat
of a proposed five acre office development wnich is a
portion of a 69 acre parcel owned by fri-Steel Struc-
tures, Inc. The preliminary plat of the Tri-Steel
Headquarters Addition (five acre office site) has been
reviewed and accepted by the Development Review Commit-
tee and approved by resolution of the City Council.
He stated due to the location of this property in
relation to the Denton Municipal Airport, the
Development Review Committee requested submission of
a general development' plan for theentire parcel. He
stated it has been the practice of the City Council
P & L Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 8
and the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend
annexation of parcels in the region of the municipal
airport that are experienoing development activity.
An airport master plan effort is currently underwayy and
staff is continuing its policy of encouraging develop-
cents in proximity to the airport that have little
future liability potential insofar as height, noise, or
other potentially negative considerations are conuernod.
He stated Tri-Steel Structures has cooperated with annex-
ation efforts to date and has expressed a desire to nave
its preliminary and final plat approved prior to final
action in February, 1985. He stated the intent is to
begin development on the five acre office site immedi-
ately. He stated although not zoned, Tri-Steel Struc-
tures has agreed to a maximum of two stories for the
proposed office use; staff recommends continuation on
the five acres proposed to be developed.
Ms, Cole made a motion to recommend the proposed
annexation of approximately 5 acres of land located
north of Highway 380 west and ad acent and west Of Masch
Branch Road. Seconded by Mr, La or,te and unanimously
carried (5-0),
F. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed voluntary annexation of 131,761 acres
of land located south of Robinson Road and east of
Nowlin Road (A-10),
Mr, Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
request for 131.761 acres of land located soutn of
Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road, the pproposed
Oakmont Development, which is located in both Denton
and Corinth, He stated staff recommends approval of
the voluntary annexation of this request.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommmend the proposed
voluntary annexation of 131,761 acres of land located
south of Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road.
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (5-0),
G. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the
proposed voluntary annexation of approximately 112 acres
located west of I-35E service road and north of Marshall
Road and east of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (A-12).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation re-
quest of approximately 112 acres located west of 1-35E
service road and north of Marshall Road and east of the
Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad. He stated staff recom-
mends approval of this annexation +request.
Mr. Escue made a motion to recommend the annexation of
approximately 112 acres located west of 1-35E service
road and north of Marshall Road and oast of. the Topeka
and Santa Fe Railroad. Seconded by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (5-0).
H. Adoption of policies of planning and Zoning Commission,
Mr, Ellison; stated staff recommends tabling this item
until the next meeting when the dirootor o£ the Planning
and Community Development Department can be present to
discuss the policiesi
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December 18, 1984
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing concerning the proposed
voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres of land
located south of Robinson Road and east: of
Nowlin Road (A-10)
SUMMARY. The owners and prospective developers, the
proposed 760+ acre "Oakmont" development
(encompasses property located in bot►a Denton
and Corinth), have petitioned for annexation
of the above referenced portion of the overall.
deVel0p1uent area. An attached mapp shows the
requested land uses for the 131.7b1, acres
involved in this request. The Planning and
Zoning Commission will consider` making its
recommendation on the total development propJsal
at its meeting of December 12, 1984.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES; 1. Approve annexation request and continue
process
2. Deny request
EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map
2. Land Use Map
3. Service Plan
4. Schedule
5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission
I a 3.a ElI' son
Senior Planner
0511,:
tiJIN
DfNT4N ClrY 4m4
#
INrN /r1' 1 .
R
TZ,
pr
4
A-10
;'C1TY lrwirs•
i ow M.4P
.
Sin
17
Single rttllY"Homes
-Cluster Homes s OW/A
40.2 Ac
o OW/Ac ? Golf Course & Club Aret
296 Units I I 10,7 At
it ~ff act 01-1V
!lo Home
6,7 At
Golf course 6.6 Dui At
51 Units
01.a A•4
ii Patio Hom+ s, t
+1.9 A0
6.6 Du/Ac '
V \ 1~7 Uplts
.
J M
1I1 ~\``Estate Homes,
r' 1 14.2 A0
t
a o u/ A o 'Groot "0-1 1'
43 Until Estate Homes
1/ ~DUnite
9 partments'7~,'_, !f
Coridominiums
11.* At
r
1.6 nu/Ac
214'unttI -Two Tram jay " Qa
Sho~p'ing Garden Homes
s.z Ao wo Family Garden Home
e.7 At 0.3 0, /,.A: T
b 6r6 At 1 Qt'(ir
b.6 bv~Ao
67 Units ownhome p
3,6 Ao
U4 DuiAo
+ OZ Unll►
N Itl ~
I7 N I IItl )i
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY O TON, TEXAS
IYH=AS, Axtiol.e 070% as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1, Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
I, Basic Service Plan
A, Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,-
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Stater for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in-the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation,
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the effective date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation,
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
04 Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H, Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation, City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
r
Servioe Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
i
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation,
II, Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
r.
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities,
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics,
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in. the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longeir than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
. k
w
A-10
ANNEXATION SCH&UULE
November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items
November 13, 19d4 Submit agenda backup
*November '2U, 1954 City Council sets date, time and
place for public hearing
November 41, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
November 23, 19b4 Publish notice v L.. c
November 2b, 1984 Submit agenda item
a November 27, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*December 04, 1984 City Council holds public hearing
December U5, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
December U7, 1984 publish notice t December 1U, 1984 Submit agenda item
December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
"December ld, 1984 City Council holds public hearing
December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item
January U2, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January lU, 1985 Ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance
February ll, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 12, 1985 Submit agenda back-up
*February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council
P & Z Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 8
and the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend
annexation of parcels in the region of the municipal
airport that are experiencing development aotivity.
An airport master plan effort is currently underway and
staff is continuing its policy of encouragin8 develop-
menta in proximity to the airport that have little
future liability potential insofar as height, noise, or
other potentially negative considerations are concerned.
He state Tri-Steel Structures has cooperated with annex-
ation of orts to date and has expressed a desire to have
its preliminary and final plat ap roved prior to final
action in February, 1985. He sta~ad the intent is to
begin development on the five acre office site immedi-
ately. He stated although not zoned, T,ri-Steel Struc-
tures has agreed to a maximum of two stories for the
proposed office use; staff recommends continuation on
the five acres proposed to be developed,
Ma. Cole made a motion to recommend the proposed
annexation of approximately $ acres of land located
north of Highway 380 west and adjacent and west of Masch
Branch Road. Seconded by Mr. LaPorte and unanimously
carried (5.0).
F. [Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres
t 4~ of land located south of Robinson Road and east of
Nowlin Road (A-10).
~t Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
request for 131.761 acres of land located South of
Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road, the proposed
Oakmont Development, which is located in both Denton
and Corinth, He stated staff recommends approval of
the voluntary annexation of this request.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommmend the proposed
voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres of land located
south of Robinson Road acid east of Nowlin Road.
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously carried (5-0).
C. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the
proposed voluntary annexation of approximately 112 acres
located west of 1-35F service road and north of Marshall
Road and east of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (A-12).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation re-
quest of approximately 112 acres located west of 1-35E
service road and north of Marshall Road and east of the
Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad. He stated staff recom-
mends approval of this annexation request.
Mr. Eacue made a motion to recommend the annexation of
rond approximately anorth 112 acres
Marshall Road and teast lof 5 the service Topeka
and Santa Fe Railroad. Seconded by Ms. Cole and
unanimously carried (5.0).
H. Adoption of Policies of Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Ellisot,,stated staff recommends tabling :this item
until the n,►xt meeting when the director of the Planning
and Communi!'y Development Department can be present to
discuss the policies.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: December 18, 1984
SUBJECT: Hold a puulic hearing concerning the petition
for annexation of approximately 112 acres
located west of Highway I-35E service road,
north of Marshall. Road and east of the Topeka
and Saute Fe Railway. (A-12)
SUMMARY: The above referenced tract is owned by three (3)
individuals that have submitted a petition for
both annexation and zoning. The proposed zoning
is light industrial (LI), A change in zoning
petition cannot be considered by the city
council until final annexation action is
complete.
R81COMMENDATION: The Planning and '3oning Commission recommends
approval of the annexation request.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve petition and continue process
2. Deny petition
EXHIBITS: 1. Map
2. Service Plan
3. Schedule
4. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes
David 81lisoll
senior Planner
0530s
I
I U
, tl
2!G! 7a n
fITC
r AI r
4
A-12
,
H WLIIt OC11 }Y A IdU.t i 1%FtIt t r'Rrt t11 •.v A 1.11 ' 11 WA14 A OW
h~yr
It 14 tot
134 266 At I 1 1,
I i J I Iglu u1141•.r PIAI ~ 0111 u.yl MAI
I
I
I k
1 ~ ,I
~A I ' AAI ',()N Sr A 't
w . ) „0111 Itf0W,l tIA1 lull
f I
I
I. 04,1
I L v.r nn lrn• ,hAl
1
0.:r• hn iiNll 16 ,
\ I iJrl .ryl n..'. yll iryA kNyr(,, MAP
l.Ill~ b I ' LH I ' ff
III 8i
I
I ;7 I JO(1'
,
Yt(IIMIWAV fo/trtrt YUt
m tee At
R VAII IOCX SY A•1AOS r uv +tiu
IS 6611 C R R CO SY A-111
4 WAVE 4Mk407 wN/tat~M•Nei to rew
CI tYICOUNtY I'DCA 1011, TCk IV A-NOI
lot
I .nuw M«~i r.rr, wrw w~a new Its..
WAI t it =rK • r.r+. M i ftA e11Y t. T f
PLAN OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA CITY OF DENTM TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article Ma as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the gove,rni.ng body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area,, and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which iF; bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS,
Section 16 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is horeby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service;
1, Basic Service Plan
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic, control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards,
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation,
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided aL city rates, from existing city
lines on the o iective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4,09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas,
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4,09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas,
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within th' city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation,
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Straets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc,)
will begin on the offeotive date of annexation,
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city,
G, Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc,) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H, Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will. thereafter
encompass the annexed area,
I, Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city,
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tive date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational prograin and
facilities in the enlarged city,
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
Servipe Plan
Annexed Areas
Pago three
L, Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effeotive
date of annexation,
11, Capital Improvement Program (Cip)
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly, The plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as;
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restrains or opportunities,
(2) Impact on tho balanced growth policy of the city,
(3) Impact on overall city economics,
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation, In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city,
A-12
ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
November 12, 1984 Submit agenda items
November 13, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
,,"*November 20, 1984 City Council sets dater time and
place for public hearing
November 21, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
r- November 23, 1984 Publish notice •si, .rr,.~~~•Ka
November 26, 1984 Submit agenda item
November 27, 1984 Submit agenda track-up
*December U4, 1984 City Council holds public hearing
December 05, 1984 Notice to Denton Record Chronicle
December 07, 1984 Publish notice y
uecember 10, 1984 Submit agenda item
December 11, 1984 Submit agenda back-up
*December The 1984 City Council holds public hearing
December 31, 1984 Submit agenda item
January 02, 1985 Submit agenda oaek-up
*January 08, 1985 Special called meeting of City
Council to institute annexation
proceedings
January 10, 1985 ordinance to Denton Record
Chronicle
January 13, 1985 Publish ordinance
February 11, 1985 Submit agenda item
February 12, 1985 Submit agenda backup
*February 19, 1985 Final action by City Council
P w Z Minutes
November 140 1984
page 6
and the Planning and Zoning Coaimissio to recommend
annexation of parcels in the region of the municipal
airport that are experienaing development activity.
An airport master plan effort is currently uiWo sway and
staff is continuing its policy of snoouraging develop-
manta in proximity to the airport that have little
future liabiity potential insofar as height, noise, or
other potentially negative conaideration& are concerned.
He star dd Tri-Steel Structures has cooperated with annex-
ation aforts to data and has expressed a desire to nave
its pr:eviilopasnt liminary and final plat approved prior to final
action in February, 1989 He stated the intent it to
begin on the five acre office site immedi-
ately. Hs stated although not zoned, Tri•Steel Struc-
tures has a88reed to a maximum of two stories for the
proposed of Loa uae; staff recommends continuation on
the five Gores proposed to be developed.
Ms. Cola made a motion to recommend the proposed
annexation of app oxiaately 5 acres of land located
north of Highway §80 west and adjacent and west of Masch
Branch Road. Seconded by Mr. Worts and unanimously
carried (5-0).
F. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed voluntary annexation of 131.761 Acres
of land located south of Robinson Road and east of
Nowlin Road (A-10).
Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
request for 131.761 acres of land located south of
Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road, tna proposed
Oakmont Developpment, which is located in both Denton
and Corinth. Ha stated staff recommends approval of
the voluntary annexation of this request.
Mr. Juren made a motion to recommmend the proposed
voluntary annexation of 131.761 acres of land located
south of Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road.
Seconded by Mr. Escue and unanimously CArried (5.0).
C. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the
proposed voluntary annexation of approximately 112 acres
located wait of 1-35E service road and north of Marshall
Road and east of the Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (A-12).
i~ Mr. Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation re-
quest of approximately 112 acres located west of 1-35E
('1 service road and north of Marshall Road and east of the
Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad. He stated staff recom-
mends approval of this annexation request.
Mt. Eacus made a motion to recommend the annexation of
approximately 112 auras located west of 1-35E service
road and north of Marshall Road and east of the Topeka
and Santa Fe Railroad. Seconded by Me. Cole and
i unanimously carried (5.0).
H. Adoption of Poli.ciaa of Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Ellison stated staff recommends tabling this item
until the next matting whin the director of the Planning
and Community Development Department can be present'to
discuss the policies.
J u L -
j
N0.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE; OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip-
ment, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials equipment, supplies
or services as shown in the "Bid Proposalsl' submitted therefor;
and
WHEREAS, the City Counei.l has provided in the City Budget
for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of
the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and
accepted herein; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
Wl1EREAS~ Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contract+ng of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS;
SECTION I.
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown In the "Bid
Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest responsible bids for such items;
BID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
.9366 1 Krause Dodae _ 5121,434,72
_.,9366 2 _Krause d 36.184126
_ 9366 3 _Mcllatt Chevrolet $ 10,442,17
-9366 4 McMott Chevrolet 7,581 31
9367 2 Krause_Dodge $ 39,945,05
9367 3 Krause Dodder $ 32,796.60
St4TION II,
That by the acceptance and approval o4 the above numbered
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting, the bids for such 'items and agrees to
purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities
and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
PACE 1
CONTINUATION SECTION I,
BID NUMBER ITEM NO, VENDOR AMOUNT
4
_ 9367 4 _Krause Dodge $ Q,599,85
9367 _ 5 _ Krause Dodge $ 24,834,90
9367 6 Krause Dodge $ 81814,15
9367 7 Bill Utter Ford $ 10,031,00
9367 8 Bill Utter Ford $ 13,996,00
9370 All Gelco Municipal Service 8.68;
9371 All IBM $ 35,480,00
9373 All American HV Test, Inc, $ 9,300,00
9374 All Whitmire Line Clearance $100,000,00
SECTION III.
That should the city and persons submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval,
and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designatod
representative is heresy authorized to execute the written
contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the
written contract is in accordance with the teems, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums
contained in the Bid proposal and related bid documents herein
approved and accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant ro a written
contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this la day of December , 1984.
RICHARD 0, b
CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS
ATTEST;
=RLOTTE ALLEN CITY ECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS S
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM1
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY;
PAGE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: December 18, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent/Ordinance'
SUBJECT: BID #9366 POLICE S'eDANS AND SEDANS
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of Police Patrol
Sedans, Administrative Sedans and Station Waggons.
The eleven (11) patrol sedans are for the Police
Department, Two of the Administrative Sedans
are for the Fire Department, and two are for the
Police Department. The full- ize station wagon
is for the Plice'Department, and the mid-size
wagon is for the Fire Inspection Department, One
patrol sedan is a fleet addition and one of the
administrative sedans is also, The other units
are Motor Pool Replacements,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-85 Budget Funds and Motor Pool Replacement Funds
RECOMMENDATION: We reconmend this bid be awarded to the lowest
bidder meeting specifications for each item as
listed below:
#1 Krause Dodge $115039,52 ea. $121,434,72
#2 Krause Dodge $ 9,546.07 ea. $ 389184,28
#3 McNatt Chevrolet $10,442.17 ea. $ 10,442,17
#4 McNatt Chevrolet $ 71581,31 ea. 7,581,31
The price for Item 2 offered by Krause Doge is
$56,88 higher than the price offered by McNatt
Chevrolet; however, it included a 24 month, 249000
mile extended warranty, The McNatt.price includes
only a 12 month, 12,000 mile warranty,
EXHIBIT: .Tabulation S eeet
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
f3ID rI rl,l;._...P.OL1CE-Sf:DAMS_.&-SED6NS DAVE MCNATT CHESTER 611.1.
KRAUSE CHEVROLET MORRIS UTTER
arrtais~ 11--84__2_P M, DODGE CHRYSLER FORD
PLYMOUTH
ACCOUNT
I!
h QTY Ll' :~I. U ~SC~I1''1IQN~_ Vf NU01~ VENDOR y VEN )0R_u VENW- R VLNDOR VENDOR + VI NllUR _
11,4 9.52 11,863,82_ 111?63,41 11,404,00
4_,-_Fgur 9 646,_07 _ 9,489_.49 9,687,32 10,455,00
3 1 Four Door Station Wagon Full J~ NB, 105442,17 NB 10,953.00 i
4_-_- okra-oox StAt3on Wagon 8 716,67 _71581.31 ~.8>730,02 9 413 00 _
Mid -Size
DeIiyery_~__ 75 Days 60-90 Day 45 DAys
CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
BATE OF MEETING: gecember 18, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent/Ordinance
SUBJECT: BID #9367 PICKUP TRUCKS AND VAN
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of pickups, light
trucks and a van for motor pool replacement in
the;
Building Inspection 3 ~ Ton Pickup
Electric Meter a Sub Sta. 1 4 Ton Pickup
Electric Meter b Sub Sta. 1 3/4 Ton Pickup
Cust(~mer Service 1 k Ton Pickup
Solid Waste 1 3/4 Ton Pickup
j Wastewater Treatment 1 3114 Ton Pickupp 4 Wh, Or,
Animal Control 1 3/4 Ton Cab Chassis
Water a Sewer 1 1 To„ Truck
Par'cs b Recreation 1 15 Passenger Van
and fleet additions in:
Animal Control 1 3/4 Tan Pickup
Water a Sewer 1 3/4 Ton Pickup
Water & sewer 1 3/4 Ton Cab/Chassis
Warehouse 1 3/4 Ton Pickup
Parks b Recreation 1 1 Ton Truck/Tow Package
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE Of FUNDS: 1984-85 Budget Funds From the Above Listed Departments
and Motor Pool Replacement Funds
RECOt4MENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
bidder meeting specifications as follows:
N1 Not be purchased and quantity of Item 2 increased.
#2 Krause Dodge $ 7,989.01 ea. $ 39,945.05
#3 Krause Dodge $ 8,199,15 ea. $ 32,79660
#4 Krause Dodge $ 9$99.85 ea. $ 9,599.85
#5 Krause Dodge $ 8,278.30 ea. $ 249834.90
#6 Krause Dodge $ 8,814,15 ea. $ 85814.16
#7 Bill 'Utter Ford $109031.00 ea. $ 10,031,00
#8 Bill Utter Ford $139996.00 ea. $ 13,996,00
Total Bid Award $140,017.55
Delivery is from 45 to 90 Days
EXHIBIT: Tabulation Sh et
. C.
SUBMITTED BY: Tom D. Shaw, C.P,M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
Hitt # .9367-
BID TITLE PICK-UPS AND VANS
OVENrn•_____ 12-11-84 2 m, DAVE MCNATT BILL
- p--- - KRAUSE CHEVROLET UTTER
ACCOUNT # DODGE FORD
QTY _.LUE(L.PLe"_8;E,It LJT QN VI~N(XR _VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR ~ VENDOR - VENDOR _T
_2. __._Picku~ 48.x.
2 3 -picker ~ Yon LWB 6 7,989 0L_. 265.24 8,288,00_
3 4 fiickup_ 3/4 Ton LWB V8 81199.15 91269,38 9 52,x;.0,0__,
'4 1 Pickup 3/4 Eon LWB V8 4WD 9,599,85 309051.51 , ).0,815.00
5 _3 _Cab-Chassis 3/4 Ton LW8 V8~ x,278.3 _ 9.31 4.76 9,323.00
6 -1 _Cab-Chassis._ 1 Ton 8,814.15 10,020,24 9 859,00
1 Cab-Chassis 1 Ton Tow Pkg. ` NB- _ 109216.12 10,031.00
8 1 Van 15 Passenger A4,769.95 ` ~I --13,99.6,010 Delivery
60`90 Days 60 Des 45-90_D~s ~ ---u
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: December 16, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent/Ordinance
SUBJECT: BID #9370 LEASE/PURCHASE FINANCING OF MOTOR
POOL EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY: This bid is for the lease/purchase financing of
Motor Pool Equipment for the 1984-85 fiscal year,
The payments will be for 36 months, First payments
are due upon delivery of oquipment, This bid
covers the funding for twenty (20) pieces of
equipment, (See excerpt from Bid 9370 for complete
list indicating cost and delivery schedule,)
Third party leasing allows us to lessen the impact
on cash flow, spread payments over 36 months, and
take advantage of low interest rates,
ACTION REQUIRED: ApMroval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-85 Budget Funds and Motor Pool Replacement Funds
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest
bidder of Gelco Municipal Service, The fixed
annual percentage rate is 8,68%, Payments are
to be made monthly in arrears. We feel like this
is an excellent rate of interest,
EXHIBITS: Tabulation Sheet
P4ge 3 and 4 Qf BID #9370
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom D, Shaw, C,P,M,
Assistant Purchasing Agent
Ib quo-....__
_
.
aEtpu Ott _QF-MJ.QR_
J'I, EQU PI OELCO FORD MERCANTILE SECURITY SECURITY FIRST FIRST APITAL FIRST
r IN, - -Qw~ FMT MOTOR BANK PACIFIC PACIFIC CONT, PEN i1UNICIPAL 1TY CONT.
MANAGEMENT CREDIT CAPITAL LEASING CORP. LEASING EASING EASING
C:CC~I~N'1' i SERVICES IIARKETS INC. 0.
_ `__ITf'H [iF ~<F7fiPf~N_ ' _ V At !'Ii E Wff ` VfTSGiSN - V>IFItS~ V)~1[x511 " V1aF1I~Tif~" VLFIt3tSti-'- ~o1i ~ V1'ATiuIF- V~Pbc3i~`" VFN
Annuei Percentage Rate x:68 10,6 415199 8,74 8,99 9,961 1015 9.4'.. 8,95
BID N"FR 9370 RID PROPOSALS Page 3 of 20
ITEM 613CNlf T10N QUAN. PRICR AMOVNT
eve
sualostsd "t" 41.4 4604i4i"q bhs eg ooWA 6.
o-
orpti'e
in bho ,
LRASt3/PURCUSR AORKSMKVT FOR MISCELLANEOUS BQUIPMRMT
AS ONSCRIBKD ULM
013CAIPTIOM Q} DRL, SCM=Ds
1, Side Loading Refuse Truck 64,121,00 1/02/85 1
2, Side Loading Refuse Truck 64,121.00 1/02/85 1
3. Side Loading Refuse Truck 64,121.00 1/02184 1
4. Repr, Loading Refuse Truck 490432.00 1/02/85 1
5, atoll-off Type Refuse Truck 74,019.00 12/20/84 1
6, Conosercial Side Loading
Truck 619079,64 12/20/84 1
7, Commeroial Side Loading
Truck 61,079,64 12/20/84 1
8. 6 yard Dump Truck 20,000.00 4/01/65 1
9. 6 yard Dump Truck 209000-00 4/01/85 1
10. Sewer Cleaning Truck 1100000,00 4/01/85 1
TOTALS
We quota the above f.o.b. Denton, Texas, Shipment tan be made in days from receipt of order. Terms net
unless otherwise indicated,
In submitting the above bid, the vendor agrees that screptanoe of any or all bid items by the City of Denton, Texas within a
reasonable period of time constitues a contract.
N Inca Addre" 81ddor
City state Zip slan~tur~
Tal"hod• TWO
DID NUMBER 0370 BID PROPOSALS Page 4 of 20
ITEM P1sCRIPTION WAN, PRICK AMOUNT
LRASICOURCHASR AORRKUNT FOR KISCKLLA SOUS KQUIRMP.NT
As ONSCRtsto 81114OW4 (Continued from previous Page)
OKSCRIpTIU CiQ ORL, SCRf;D,
11, Truck with Flatbed & Hoist 20,000,00 3/01185 1
12, 1 Ton Flatbed Truck 15,000,00 2/15185 1
13. 15 Passenger Van 16,000,00 2/15/85 1
14, Truck and Asphalt
Distributor $59000,00 001/85 1
15, Tractor Loader Backhoe 26,000,00 2/01/85 1
16, Front Loader 20,000,00 2/01/85 1
17, Vibratory street Roller 20,000,00 2/15/85 1
18. Steel Wheel Street Roller 60,000.00 2/13/83 1
19, Trailer Flat 321 100000,00 2/15/85 1
20. Tractor !lower 8,000,00 4/01/85 1
NOTC Item 1 thru 7 are firm prices with realistic
delivery schedules, All others are asttmated only,
oe :
TOTALS
We quote the above Lo,b, Denton, Texas, Shipment can be made in days from receipt of order. Terms net
unless otherwise indicated,
In submittinj thil above bid, the vendor agrees that acceptance of any or all bld items by the City of Denton, Texas within a
reasonable perloti of time constitues a contract,
Nulling Addraf Blddor
City State 210 Slgmtun
Td Isphon • Title
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SWORY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING; December 18, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent/Ordinance
SUBJECT: BID #9371 IBM DISK DRIVE
SUMMARY; This hid is for the lease/Purchase of a 3370
Model 2A Disk Drive for use by the Data Processing
Department to upgrade the existing equipment,
This item will be purchased on a Lease/Purchase •
Contract through IBM or through our lease/purchase
package for equippment being approved under a
separate bid. This will depend on the best
interest rate for the City of Denton,
ACTION REQUIRED; Approval by Council
SOURCE OF FUNDS; Budgeted Payments
RECOMMENDATION; We recommend this bid be awarded to IBM the only
bidder on this compatible equipment for the purchase
price of $35,480,00 payable in 48 months lease/
purchase at $892,43 per month, transportation cost
$95,00, and maintenance at $126,00 per month after
three months factory warranty with delivery by
February 28, 1985,
EXHIBIT: ..814 Proposa l
SUBMITTED BY:
;!Jo.A J rshall, C.P.M.
Purchasing Agent
BID ER 9371 BID PROPOSALS Page z of z
ITI PA Ql~CR{PTIQN QUAN. PRICE AMOUNT
1, IBM 3370 Model 2A Disk Drive with 730 Mega Bytes of 1 $35,480 $35,480
storage capacity, or an approved compatible ec,ual,
2. 48 Months Lease/Purchase Under this contract, the City of $892.43/m.
Cost Per Month Denton will own the equipment at
the and of the 48 month period.
Contract includes a fiscal year
3, Installation Cost funding out clause. No Charge
4, Transportation Cost $95.00 $95,00
5, Maintenance Contract Cost (per year) $126/mo. $1,512/yr
Equipment includes 3 month warranty, i.e. Maintenance
billing will start 3 mo, after installation. Maintenance
is quoted for 7 atm. to 6 p.m. Monday thru Friday.
Bust show leaseholders with cpmplete address.
Warranty covers equipment 24 hours/day, 7 days/week.
The equipment bid must he acceptable by IBM for a
Maintenance Contract,
*If the City of Denton chooses to purchase
the 3370(itemlll), the terms and conditions
in the attached IBM Purchase Supplement should
be included in this bid response, If the City
of Denton chooses to finance the 3370 over
48 months(item#2), the terms and conditions
in the attached IBM installment Payment.
Agreement should be included in this bid
response,
TOTALS
We quote the above Ca,b Denton, Texas, Shipment can be made )H Terms net
unless otherwise Indicated, by 02/29/84
In submitting the above bid, the vendor agrees that acceptance of any or all bid items by the City of Denton, Texas within a
reasonable period of time constitues a contract.
P.O. Box 340921 IBI
fAMA9 AddrMt n 4 dWr
Dallas TX 75234 l '
CITY State ZIP Slgn~luN
620-6137 Marketing Representative
TN~pnon• TR1d
J
Intsm ilanal 8utino" M00hims COrgomflon Armonk, Now York 10504 Supplement to Agreement'for Purchase of 11#M Machines
(X I'urcl,aa4 of Ua•Urdar Maelslrlar ( i Purelaa4a of IlwlttMad Machlder
Rlarw h Refnlenen nefnlnnro
IBM
,~{R1WMI~i~u.r re<Inln,enl Nu.l
N, f aV omer(iavoka loll 8 .in,I,Ilallor, AtWeal A
C'RIuIT& Alts ,(RcNu.; Am*,
323 E. McKi,nney/~ I:udertxrRefctcmnt vtlu4J aalnl'rclwrrd 12/04/81
Denton, TX 16201 I'urcllMw nrirnl~Ikd Mi[I~irreei If..,Nf x M. ,M t:flr, u,r 1144 of lrorrl,...i
INM Resimb Offk4 Adalreaal ees (All purrhaw ur lrutalled Manhiner may lw choligevl l y NN up to nrxl lilt lral ingg tlx F:(Ie, llru
Kato of Purchase (which must lie wltldu Idle Q,wlaliun MonlW, wliY-i I to au) I nitiaituns rk~
2727 183 Freeway acrilxdin llx s(gdieahh+ IBM lease ur rental revowill.
Dallas, TX 75234 ~ AVarranty Malme"mee
FI Olah>„s A nl
9ervkv
1yIxr y res
IBM Pi" F'umbase
Onkror like 1:aIImaleJ y Avallallln Avairalde
Machine Serial Model or $ Tutal ShllIune"I Y ~ (NNmUII• r] II1)nksa ,
y. w Number (+I Fealure Ikscriptbn IPerUahl f llale M lessNolerl) _ Nine,)
L 3370 829XDH A02 DASD 11135,480,00 035,480,00
1, Sr .1 I
!1F ,t t'l fl ~ "1
t u
kkf I,'i,1 ,.j
1
~rf.~ r ~ .'.1 • 1 Sri
A A., 01
THIS SUPPLEMENT CONFIRMS YOUR ORDER TO PURCHASE THE MACHINES LISTED HEREIN. FURTHERS CUSTOMER AGREES THAT THIS SUPPLEMENT AND THE REFERENCED AGREEMENT,
INCLUDING ANY OTHER IBM AGREEMENTS OR CERTIFICATIONS REFERRED TO THEREIN, AND REF'EREN CE 1) AMENDMENT, IF ANY, ARE THE COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES, SUPERSEDING ALL PROPOSAIJ' 00 PRIOR AGREEMENTS, ORAL ON WRITTEN, AND ALL OTHER COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE PARTIES RELATING
TO THE SUNJECT MATTER HEREOF,
END USER CERTIFICATION, SEE REVERSE SIDE. _ (4) Am 1144110 Ries Mac Lime Serial Nurrsben
lovntee Inforlllaliurll Invni.ee No.t 8901991 Suhlnlal f 33, 480, 00 WARRANTY OPTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACREEWNTSEHVICE
Paymenl u due on the bale of Inslallallon eseept for Ip,uunhase of tnualkd Machines for which ~ roVos,w~,A (Ilve revorso side hK athlidonal In(u.roat")
payment mum W ,calved by Inv, Ntfor to the e W of the 0uo1a11 in Month in onler to establlsh Tasty : N/A By aeleeNng for ewrh MatbMue Type Win the Types A,atlable vml
by hdlialin6
The Effectlve Ihteof Purchase, below, ~ml relun,ing it ropy of each Imp of This bapvIemenl b. mvt at its MI-
Remil to Athlroaal ueslinatiun Charges S Invoiced Later tirreesss Illl-k,777ve, the fuatunlur aueepls:
[lay nib Amount S IBM Warrmity (h)limn, If available; aNVW
33,480.00 IBM Malnlenance Agreemem Service.
21254631-M (UNOSO) 744 (&pgMnNMCdnYraMlonztaglS/t06S Page of
1n*nwA mW gush Machin" CnrpoAlbn Am wk, New York rasa
IraWInwit Psym nt `Agmm"t
tstww► and Loots (11*0.ntn+«h)
Nana and AddrW of Cuslonwr. Reference Agreement No„
CITY OF DENTON Reference Supplement ogled
215 E. McKinoay
Daato'l,f TX 76201 Agreement No,;
?BM Branch Oft* Address, IBM Branch Office No.; GMG
2727 LBJ Freeway Customer No. 1802610
Dallas, TX 75234
Internattlonal Suslneu Machines Corporation (ISM) and the Customer agree that th(s Installment Payment Agreement
supplements and amends the referenced Agreement for Purchase of ISM Machines and Its referenced Supplement with
respect to the following IBM machines, features, model upgrades, machine elements and/or accessories (hereinafter
called "Machines unless the context requires Individual reference).
Order or Purchase
mwhk* Type Number (0)
oty. Ti Feature Dowdpilon (Net Unit price) Amount S
1 3370 829YDH A02 Disk Drive $351,480.00 $35,480,00
An Indicates Machine Sarlal Number. TOTAL: $ 35,480, 00
StaMrnent of Ti anaaation
1,. Cash Price (If this were fA cash sale) . . . $ 35, 480.00
2, Trade-in Allowance Ctecilt (from IBM trade-In agreement) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , $ NSA
3. Cash Down Payment. , , , , , , , $ 00 , 00
4. Total Down Payment (Sum ofItems 2and3),,,,,,,,,$ 00.00
5. Unpaid Balance of Cash Price (item Iminus Item 4),, 350480.00.
3. State and Local Taxes, if applicable . . . . . . . , $ n0. 110
7. Amount to be Financed (Sum of Items 5 and 6) , , , , . , , . $ *15,48t) ,gp
8. FINANCE CHARGE (Time Price Differential on Item 7 . Finance Charge consists
of Interest at an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE of 1 % , , , , , , , , , $ 7, 356, 64
9. Tax on Finance Charge, If applicable, (payable In first Installment) , , $ - 00.00
10. Total Amount of Remalning Payments (Sum of Items 7, 8 and 9) . . . . . . $ 42,836.64
11. Total Time Sale Price (Sum of Items 4 and 10) . . . . $ 42,836,64
ztao.zm-as (Nw. olrar) 1 Ppo 1 of 4
WM sea
ItiyM►NIh The Customer may, at anYy tl", pay in adVanoe the full
Tht Ustomer agrees to paythe Cash Down Paymerit, amount due hereunder and the Flnanoe Chargo will be
It any, (a) upon the Cate of n~e;~~,lotlon of the Maahlttes`or adjusted byY IBM 1Q retlect the shorter payment period,
`b) wtt reepeot to Installed Maof,ini?*,-on the Bffeotive All remittaxncbs are to be made to the IBM Branch Office
Rate of Purchase, and ayre" to pay the Total Amount of address listed herein unless otherwlss, requested by ISM.
notnalnln Payments In conseouth4 'Periodic Payments,
Including Finance Charge, forthe FI3~cal Periods as set forth Asslgno* i4
below In either Payment Plan I or Payment Plan II, This Instf llmont Payment Agreement is not assignable by
sub-
PAYMENT Pf.Ahl I the Cuoconler, nor may the Customer sell, transfer, atantlally modify, relocate or dispose of any or all of the
Periodic Pa ment Finance Charge Machines without prior written permisslon of ISM, In no
FIWAI (Annum) (included in event may the Machines be relocated outside the United
Period (Blennial) Payment) States. Any attempted assignment or transfer by t
Customer of any of the rights, duties or obligations of this
1 Installment Payment Agreement Is void,
2 cuN ollees 00"Wilt
3 NSA The Customer covenants and agrees that (a) it will not
create, assume, or voluntarily suffer to exlst, wlthuut giving
ISM at least 16 calendar days' prior written notice, any
4 mortgage, pledge, encumbrance, security Interest, lien or
charge of any kind upon any or all of theMachines; (b) It will
5 keel the Machines In good repair and operating condltlon;
(o) It will promptly pay all taxes, Interest and other charges
6 when levied or assessed upon the Machines or their
operation or use, or upon IBM, exclusive of taxes teased on
IBM's not Income, In connection with this Installment
PAYMENT KAN II Payment Agreement; (d) It will promptly satisfy all hens
against the Machines; and (e) there are no mortgages,
Total Finance pledges, encumbrances, securlty Interests, lions or charges
Pvaodb Poyrrwl Charge for
(Total 01 Monthly Flaoal Period of 4-ny kind by any party other than IBM orasslgns upon he
FIvAl Payments for Momhly (Included In machines on which features, model upgrades, machine
period Fiscal Period) Payment Payments) elements or accessories will be Installed subject to this
Installment Payment Agreement,
1 6 , 24 7.01 892.43 frauranca
2 101709, 16 892,43 The Customer further agrees to procureand maintain fire
Insurance with extended coverage against loss, theft,
3 10, 709.16 892, 43 damage to or destruction of the Machines for the full
Insurable value thereof for the duration of this Installment
4 Payment Agreement, the pollcy for such Insurance being
10,709.16 892,43 endorsed to show loss payable to IBM and assigns as
respeotive Interests may appear, Upon request, a certificate
5 4,462,15 892.43 of such Insurance will be furnished to IBM or assigns. Any
proceeds received directly by IBM under such Insurance
6 shall be credited to the payment required from the Custo-
mer pursuant to the Section entitled "Casualty Occur-
The Periodic Payment for Period 1, which Includes the rences,
Tax on Finance Charge, If applicable, Is due on the first
business day of the moratn following the Date of Installation t,^"WHY occurnnc"
or the Bffeotive Date of Purchase, and the Periodic Pay- A Casualty Occurrence shall be deemed to exist If any of
ments for Periods 2 through ---g - are due on the first the Machines shall be lost, stolen, Irreparably damaged or
business day of each succeeding Fiscal Period, If Payment destroyed or otherwise rendered p( rrrlanently unfit for use
Plan I has been chosen, payments must be made In full on from any cause whatsoever prior 6 the payment In full of
the due dates, If Payment Plan II has been chosen, the Total Time Sale Price. To the extent permitted by law,
payments must be made in 'equal consecutive monthly the Customer shall promptly pay to IBM a sum equal to the
installments, except that the first lnstatiment will include the aggregate Casualty Value of such Machines,
Tax on Finance Charge, If applicable, beginning on the due The Casualty Value of each Machine suffering a Casualty
dates and contlnuing on the corresponding day of each Occurrence shall be the sum of the unpaid balanced of the
month of each Fl al Period until fully paid, Payments State and Local Taxes, Unpaid Balance of Cash Price and
fnolude Finance Charge In the appropriate amount In- Finance Charge at the time .ofsuch Casualty Occurrence
dloated above, and attributable 1o such Machine, The Finance Charge shall
The Customer having been offered the cholce of pur- be adjusted by IBM to reflect the shorter payment period,
chasing at the fovegoing Cash Price Wale appliccble State Anyy money so pald shafl be "applied by IBM to reduce
and Local Taxes) or at the Total Time Wale Price has elected Installments thereafter falling due so that such Installments
to purchase at such Total Time Sale Price, represent only the payments due for the remaining Ma-
2120.2"1.03 (14v.01/a1)
U/M M Pa" 2 004
ohlner Any excess Insurance payments received' by IBM naaonable attorney's tees and I4gal expenses,13M will pay
shall be credited to the Customer, to the Customer any portion of To not proof In excess
of the unhald Total Tlme Bale Price,
e'vef►ts of 001"N In'tthe event IBM rep4seaasee and'romovoO a fe`ditUre,
Any one or Moro of the following are Events of Nlault; (a) model urade, machine element or accosso , It shall be
the Culitomer falls to pay when duo any amount required to the Cuspgtomer's reegqonslblllty to restore anyv remafning
be paid by the Customer hereunder and such failure shall Information processing equipment to good workingg order.
continue for period' of seven days after the due date, The Customer agree that IBM shill have no liability for
except as provided In the Seotlon entitled "Funding"; (b) the damages oaused~by he repossess on of such a featv(e,
Customer falls to procure and maintain Insurance as model upgrade, machine element or accessory or by t`te
requlred In W6 Installment Payment Agreement; (o) the Customers failure to fulfill such respontiibllltles, Further,
Customer falls to perform any other provisions hereunder IBM shall have no obligation to reimburse the Customer,
or violates any of the covenants or agreements made by the user or any other secured party for iht cost of repair
Customer hereunder, and such failure or breach shalt resulting from such removal.
continue for a period of 15 days otter written notice Is IBM may pursue any other remedy available at law or In
recelvvd by the Customer from IBM; or (d) any insolvency equity, including, but not limited to, seeking damages,
proceedings of any character, voluntary or Involuntary, specific performance and an In unction, No right or remedy
shall be Instituted by or against the Customer. Is exclusive of any other proviided herein or permitted by
Any failure of IBM to require strlct performance by the law or equity, All such rights and remedies shall be
customer or any waiver by IBM of any provision of this cumulative and may be enforced concurrently or Individ-
Installment Payment Agreement shall not be construed as a ually from time to time.
consent or waiver of any other breach of the slime or of any
other provision. fiNtdilfp
Since the Customer Intends to request the approppriation
of funds periodically to be paid for the Machines, if funds
If an went of Default shall have occurred and be are not appropriated for the Customer for such Periodic
continuing, IBM or assigns may, to the extent permitted by Payment for any future Fiscal Period, the Customer will not
,aw, (a) Weyer from the Customer any and all amounts be obllgated to pay the remainder of the Total Time Sale
then due and to be become due, (b) take possesslon of any Price due beyond the end of the then current Fiscal Period,
or all of the Machines, wherever located, without demand or Such event will not constitute an Event of Default. The
notice and without any r9urt order or other process of law, Customer agrees to notify IBM in writing of such nonappro-
or render them unusable, and retain all prior payments as prlatlon at the earliest possible time,
partial compensation for their use and de recllatlon; (c) In the event that funds are not appropriated as provided
require the Customer to assemole the Machines and make above and the Customer Is unable to mtlte further pay-
them available to IBM, freight pro aid, at any place In the ments due under this Installment Payment Agreement
continental United States specified by IBM; and/or (d) Incur beyond the end of the then current Fiscal POlod IBM will
reasonable attorney's fees and legal expenses In exercising tvithln a reasonable time after the end of such Period, enter
any of Its rights and remedies upon default which the and take the Machines from the Customer's premises and
Customer hereby agrees to pay. Upon repossession of will retain all sums previously pald by the Customer to IBM
such Machines, IBM may sell, lease or otherwise dispose of as partial compensation for machine use and depreciation;
any or all of the Machines In a commercially reasonable provided, however that upon the Customer's request, the
manner, with or without notice and by public or private Customer may, prior to such repossession, retain the
proceedings, and apply the net proceeds thereof towards Machines during a reasonable period agreed to'ey ;6M at a
the amounts due under this Installment Payment Agree- monthly charge designated by IBM, beginning oil the first
ment after deducting the reasonable expenses of retaking, day following the last Fiscal Period for which payment has
holding and prAparing for such disposition and deductir;q been made hereunder,
I
Pso 3 of 4
tY k*mo ",W i.mmm a Askok a unenforceable, the patties zoo that the Machines shall he
To secure th pa mdnt of the TV( Time Sale Price, BM deemed to have beet/ Install under IBM's State and Local
rewrwtm a pure money setiur~ry intgrsalt In each oil the QovFratment~., Plain pursuant to ~h terma an cohOl-
DOI MAOeiiltes, and the' Customer hereby ' grants a security tlons 4f IBM's a gable ogreement an /or arr►en mee at
Interest In Any aubatittttlona, replacements, accessions, and IBM's applioabie.,ease Plsn Monthly 0harggeo commerio-
additions thereto and the proceeds thereof. Suoh' Interest PIng of u with. the the a in",l For or the fEfteclive tale of
shall be satisfied by payment In full of the Total Tlme Sale Poldhing, g, of IBM the shall credit For the ppeeclod prior to elan
Price. A Copy of this Installment Payment Agreement may Monthly hod Charges ll the credit to amounts the paid b by the y theablst Lease flan
omer nd a to IBM
be filed with appropriate state and local authorities, at any under this installment n a a
time after slgnatufs by the Customer, as a finanoing Payment Agreement and amounts
statement In order to perfect IBM's security interest. Such aid by the customer for maintenance, property taxes and
filing dose not constitute acceptance of this installment fnauranoe. Any excess credits will be refunded to the
Payment Agreement by IBM. The Customer also shall Customer, and any deficiency shall be due to cess but In no
execute from time to time, alone or with IBM, any flnanoing event shall any amount be
that due to IBM In excess of funds
statements or other documents and do such other `s:, )r approprlated, In the event the affected Machines are
~i staff available from 18M under a /season rental agreement, at
acts cor sidered by IBM to be necessary or desirable to the time of such holding, the Customer and IBM will agree
perfect ,,r protect the security Interests hereby created The upon a fair and equitable Lease Plan Monthly Charge for
Machines shall remain personal property, not become
fixtures to real property, and be kepi at; the period prior to and ing such holding and, Other-
wise, the provisions of this his Sect on shall apply,
If any provision or provlslons of this Installment Payment
_ 21 ate` Mr-xi,,,, Agreement shall be held to be Invalid, Illegal or unenforce-
NW- wdrou) able, and the preceding paragraph does not apply, the
Denton Danton Texas valld4y, legality and enforceability of the remaining provi-
(Gt+) (County) (state> sions shall not In any way be affected or Impaired tnereoy.
where IBM may inspect them at any reasonable time. THE CUSTOMER ACKNOWLIDGE$ THAT THE CUSTO-
MER HAS READ THIS AGREEMENT, UNDERSTANDS
Gorwoll f AGREE T BE $ UND`BY f~T~ RMS ANpp CON.
lyttt IONS, BY IOU$TOMI 1 SIGNATURE
If the Net Unit Price for any Machine Is adjusted as BELOW, ACXNOWL90GEts THAT THE CUSTOMER IS
provided In the referenced Agreement, or the trade-In LEGALLY AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREE-
allowance for any trade-in equipment Is adjusted as pro- MENT. FURTHER, THE CUSTOMER AGREES THAT
vided in an applicable IBM trade-In agreement, Items No.1 THIS INSTALLMENT PAYMENT AGREEMENT, THE
through 11 In the Statement of Transaction and the REFERENCED` AGREEMENT AND SUPPLEMENT AND
Payments herein agreed to be pald shall be adjusted, and ANY APPLICABLE ISM TRADE-IN AGREEMENT CON.
this Installment Payment Agreement shall be deemed to be STITUTE A SINGLE AOR96MENT AND THE COM•
amended accordingly. PLATE ANP EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE AGREE-
The terms and conditions of this Installment Payment MENT BETWEEN THE CUSTOMER AND IBM, WHICH
Agreement shall prevail notwithstanding any variance with SUPERSEDES ALL PROPOSALS OR PRIOR "AGREEE
the terms and conditions of the referenced Agreement. MENTS, ORAL OR WRITTEN, AND ALL OTHER COM-
Should this Installment Payment Agreement and/or the MUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE PAnTI9S RELATING
referenced Agreement be held by the courts to be invalld or TO THE SUBJECT MATTER HEREOF.
Received by IBM at
W~rkh OfNOe Name/Number
By ...................................Manapa... Signature
Name (1 YPe or Prinl)
Accepted by,
Intematlonal Business AIlacttinty Corporation CX:a 0 Di t`nx
customer
By Authon,W.SIgnature By AuthorIZ#d$~ fturo.....
Name {'fYPe or Prfn1j,, ...........................Bate Name (Type GI Prints ........................bate
PLEASE PRESS MRMLY 'METH BALL POINT PEN ON A HARD SURFACE FOR MAXIMUM LEOINILITY.
I1962Tf1~00 (M~r. Or/M)
11/Ie tkf
Pap4of4
1
'1.
CIrYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200
KMRANDUM
`blot U. Chris Hartung '
PROM: Gary A. Collins
DAIM, : December 11, 1984
SUBJWrt nA`i'A PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD
Unfortunately, at the regularly called LTieeting of the Data Processing Advisory
Board on December 10, 1984 we did not have a quorum of members, Consequently,
no votes were taken on any of the agenda items.
Mr. Gary Collins of the City's Staff discussed with Mr, Dale Maddry and
Mr. Ron McDade the need for arm additional Disk Drive and the fact that IBM
Corporation was the only bidder on this equipmnt, The two men+bers present
agreed th' s bid was consistent with past purchases of this type of equihximent.
Additionally, Mr. Gait' Collins discussed with Mr, Maddry and Mr. McDade the
implementation schedule of the proposed autonat:ed systems for the current
fiscal year and through the first quarter of the next fiscal year. Mr. Collins
reviewed the purpose of each of the proposed systems and explained the
priorities of these systems had been established by the Data Processing
Steering Committee.
Mr. Collins also discussed with Mr. Maddry and Mr, McDade the need to have a
contract with TRES Corporation for a custom programming service on the Utility
Billing System known as "CIS" and the Payroll/Personnel System known as "PIS".
Mr. Collins explained that the City of Denton has entered into this type of
contract with TRES the past two years and that these funds were budgeted in
the current fiscal year budget. Also, Mr, Collins explained that this type
of contract eliminated the need for multiple smaller contracts and established
a maximum amount tq;be spent; with TRES Corporation in the next fiscal year.
Goth Mr. Maddry and Mr, McDade agreed that this contract was preferable to
multiple contracts and was consistent with actions taken the past two years.
Pays 2
Since thkare was not a quonnn presant the Data Processing Advisory Board
did not make any recc mx)ndations for the City Council but the two mernbars
present did feel the proposed actions were reasonable and consistent with
past year's actions,
If you have any questions about this matter please feel free to call me
at any Limo,
Gaj#5~ A,
Collins
Director, Data Processing
GAC/pmj
cct Betty McKean
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUWARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING; December 18, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent/Ordinance
SUBJECT; BID #9373 TRANSFORMER LOSS TEST SET
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of testing equipment
to determine the losses associated with distribution
transformers. This will enable us to purchase
and install the most economical transformers based
on an expected lifetime cost of operation,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-86 Budget Funds Account Number 610.008-
0252-9232»E394 Electric Distribution Capital
Expenditures
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowost
bidder of. American NV Test, Inc, c/o Haenszel
Sales in the amount of $9,300.00, with delivery
in 75 days.
EXHIBIT: Tt,bulation Sheet
SUBMITTED BY:--
Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
nt.n If 9373
HID 'VIT1,[,._.LOSS._ ESLAMERICAN ULTI-
HY TEST AMP
nrrNrn SYSTEMS
INC.
ACCOUNT
ZIVI U UTION _ VENf)dHw VENDOR VENDOR-_ VRNDOR_ VRNDOR VF.NUOR V~SNUUR
1 1 Transformer LossTest Set - 99300,00 10,324,75
Model TTS-17 LTS - 167
--Del i_very 75 Days 28 Days y _ `V
- i F 0 B _ Denton Denton
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
DATE OF MEETING: December 18, 1984
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Consent/Ordinance
SUBJECT: BID #9374 TREE TRIMMING FOR MISC. ELECTRICAL
LINES
SUMMARY: This bid is for the trimming of trees to clear
overhead electrical distribution lines, This is
an onggoing project for which a specific amoui,t
of dollars are budgeted each year. The intent
is to pprevent wind and ice damage to the Electric
Distribution Overhead System,
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval by Council and Award of Bid
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1984-85 Budget Funds Account Number
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Whitmire
Line Clearance at the price of .55 per foot for
open easement and $1,10 per foot closed easement.
The entire contract will not exceed $100,000.00
total.
Our recommendation to accept the bid of Whitmire
over the bid of Trees, Inc, is based on Whitmire's
past record with the City of Denton and the
expanded proposal offered by Whitmire.
EXHIBIT: Tailbulattio eet
SUBMITTED BY:
Tom D. Shaw, C,P,M.
Assistant Purchasing Agent
BID
TREES, INC, HokrON WHITMIRE ASPLUNDH
ap~ttt.n _._..IZ IInH- NORTHEAST LINE
SERVICE CLEARANCE
ACcouN'r INC, INC
QTY, _ -1M.L DKSCRLpTiO1{ VrNbOK , VP.N[)OR V'sNUgR ^ ~ VRNDUR VENDOR VENDOR VENIM _y
1 A. Open Easement _ .40 8BO 155 ~.90
W~,.._Iasgd Easement
NB 1,0Q__ _ _
NO,
AN ORD''NANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE CERTAIN PROGRAM
SERVICE N ON THE UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM AND PAYROLL-PERSONNEL SYSTEM
DURING VISCAL YEAR 1984.85 BETWEEN THE CITY AND TRES SYSTEMS, INC.;
AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE: OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVX DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Cade of Ordinances requires that
the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every act
of the Council providing for tits expenditure of funds or for the
contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 1981 the City of Denton and TRES Systems,
Inc. entered into a "Primary Agreement" to provide computer and
other related support services; and
WHEREAS, under the Agreement the City had the right to accept
additional services from TRES Systems, Inc. by entering into "Job
Orders" une,er the terms and conditions of the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City denires to reoeivn additional support services
pursuant to the Agreemert and "Job Order" specified herein; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS) HEREBY ORDAINSt
SECTION 1.
That the "Job Order" Attached hereto, placed pursuant to the
Primary Agreement to provide custom program services on the Utility
Billing System and Payroll-Personnel System for fiscal year 1984-85
is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the "Job
Order" attached hereto and approved herein.
SECTION It.
That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of funds in the
maximum amount of $25,000 for the Job order so authorized pursuant
to the Primary Agreement.
SECTION in,
'chat this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of 1984.
RI~WD O.-MM7CIF'C ;,MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
'i"1`Ff ALLEN3
CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
t
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL. BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TEI,EPHONt: (817) 566.8200
WWRANDUM
7n~ G. Chris Hartung /
Fitt Gary A, Collins
DATES December 11, 1984
SU11JECTi DAI%A PROCESSING ADVISORY HOARD
Unfortunately, at the regularly calle( meeting of the Data Processing Advisory
Board on December 10, 1984 we did not have a quorum of members, Consequently,
no votes were taken on any of the agenda items.
Mr. Gary Collins of the City's Staff discussed with Mr, Dale Maddry and
Mr, Ron McDade the need for an additional Disk Drive and the fact that IM
Corporation was the only bidder on this equilm)ent. The two members present
agreed this bid was consistent with past: purchases of this type of equipimt.
Additionally, Mr. Gary Collins discussed with Mr. Maddry and Mr. McDade the
implementation schedule of the proposed automated systems for the current
fiscal year and through the first quarter of the next fiscal year. Mr. Collins
reviewed the purpose of each of the proposed systems and explained the
priorities of khese systems had been established by the Data Processing
Steering Conmittee,
Mr. Collins also discussed with Mr. Mad dry and Mr. McDade the need to have a
contract with TRES Corporation for a custom programming service on the Utility
Billing System known as "CIS" and the Payroll/Personnel System known as "EIS",
Mr. Collins explained that the City of Denton has entered into this type of
contract with TRES the past two years and that these funds were budgeted in
the current fiscal year budget. Also, Mr. Collins explained that this type
of contract eliminated the need for multiple smaller contracts and established
a maximum. amount to,be spent with Tmz Corporation in the next fiscal year.
Both Mr, Maddry and Mr. McDade agreed that this contract was preferable to
multiple contracts and was consistent with actions taken the past two years.
Page 2
f
since there was not a quorum present the Data Processing Advisory ward
did not make any rccommndations for the City Counoil Wt the two nmuLvrs
present did feel the proposed actions were reasonable and consistent with
past year's actions.
If you have any questions about this matter please feel free to call me
at any time,
.Co Ms
Directors Data Processing
GAC/pmj
cot Betty McKean
t
S SY INC.
1075 Add*n P40
Owl" T*X#* 76M
21444""7
December 10, 1994
Mr. Gary Collins
City of Denton'
324-A East McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dsar Garyt
Enclosed is Job Order 0.16 for a total not to exceed $25,000 for
Professional Services and expenses related to the TRES Employee
Information System and the TRES Cutrtomer Information system.
We are looking forward to supporting your Professional Serviges
needs in 1995,
Best regards,
a W. Noneman
egional Service Manager
JWN/js
Enclosure
t
G 9 TFsES sY Eiil l INC.
a Coeiti Data Company
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES JOB ORDER No. 016
CLIENT NAME PA No.
City of Denton 758
ADDRESS DATE
324-A East McKinney 12-18-84
CITY STATE YIP
Denton Texas 76201
t. 50B STATEMENT; TRES Is authorized to provide to Client consultation, training, education,
minor oustomixation, and/or major oustomization as periodically requested by Client
in reference to the TRES Employee Information System and TRES Customer Information
System, Charges for A.il such services provided hereunder will be invoiced to and
paid by gii`,ti Cf under i!4e TRES Standard Rate Schedule attached hereto and at such
tiipe's , a ,!f r'fy ,r) soi e ~~~i In. Primary Agvaement 7513.The Total. Estimated TRES Charges
aeit eq+ t v 1p' h6reinaft"s.x ilro tseTloby ck,fl.ned as representing an upper limit
of ur~Yr ~)~ftlliir~7, ~ryr'v,i,cela to }~a provi(AO horgi idr:t,, TRES will not provide nor will
Clitaa:t dc66tk )Arvicosi in Dxora si> of ;+tich to>t0, cair.rges hereunder unless such excess i
expres:lly 4.7%Qo'd to in writing by both partios hereto.
AUTHORITY: EACH PARTY HAS FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO, PERFORM, AND
EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE PERSON SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF EACH
HAS BEEN PROPERLY AUTHORI7ED AND EMPOWERED TO ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE TUIS AGREEMr-.N';,
UNDERSTANDS IT, AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY IT, IN WITNESS HEREOF, Client and TRES
have executed this agreement as of the date first indicated above.
2. ESTIMATED TRES CHARGES; (A Standard Rate Schedule(s) is attacheflThe estimated charges are:
Professional Computer Wood Relmbmsable Olher total
Services Services Processing Expenses
24,200 r 800 25,000
AGREED to ACCEPTED BY;
CLIENT TRSS Systems, Inc.
City of Denton
NAME NAME
Nelson G. Hamrick
TITLE TITLE
Senior Vice Precoident
GATE DATE
December 18, 1984
By (Authontai Signature) 8y Aulhorited Slgnalytet
AN EQUe?, OPPORTUNITY VENDOR
k,
N0.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SALE OF 0.142, ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY
AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TRANr,FEKRING TITLE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHkRF,AS, the City of Denton is the owner of real property as
described herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it would be in the
beat interest of the City to dispose of the property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, in accordance with the provisions
of Article 542le-12 V.A.T.S., has determined that the property
is of a size as to be incapable of being used independently as
zoned, and may be sold to the abutting property owners; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, the City Council has
offered to sale the property to the abutting owners in an amount
for no lose than its fair market value; and
WHEREAS, the abutting property owners have accepted the
City's offer to purchase the property for the amount stated
herein; NOW THEEREFRE:
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I.
That the real property owned by the City of Denton and con-
taining approximately 0.142 acres of land, or 6,185.52 square
feet, located at the intersection of. W. Prairie and Carroll
Boulevard, shall be sold to the abutting property owners at a
price of $1.50 per square foot or Nine Thousand Two Hundred
Seventy-eight and 28/100 ($9,278.28) Dollars.
SECTION It.
That upon receipt by the City of the amount stated above,
the Mayor is authorized to execute a general warranty deed
conveyingg title to the abutting owners of the following
described property;
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Witliam
Loving Survey, Abstract 759, Denton County, Texas, being a part
of a certain (called) 0.379 acre tract deeded by Saddie L.
Moore, at al to the City of Denton Texas on the 22nd day of
December, 1969 recorded in Volume 599, Pale 104, deed records of
said county, and being more fully described as £ollpws;
BEOINNING at the northeast corner of said 0.379 acre tract, said
point lying in the south boundary line of West Prairie Street;
THENCE south 00°26'52" east a distance of 155.12 feet to a point
in a Called 20 foot alley;
THENCE south 89°39'41" west a distance of 40.0 feet to an iron
pin;
THENCE north 00°26'52" west, 10 feet from and parallel with the
east curb of Carroll Boulevard, a distance of 155.20 feet to an
iron pin;
THENCE, north 89045157++ east a distance of 40.0 feet to the point
of beginning and containing 0.142 acre of land.
SECTION Ill.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and
effect from and after the date of its passage, and it is so
ordained,
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of
Denton, Texas, this the , day of , 1981
RICHARD 0, , MAYOR -
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
r ~p~p~A_C
WTOKNEY
C# Y OF DENTON, TEXAS
...e.a11~11'A A7aff> +~1MIM'6i~ck IM CAr feN~Nal'Ar4elwiNaMl+nt4 MO ft00M0"014' Mo"j
THE STATE OF TEXAS, ~ IcNOW AM MEN BY THESE PIiF,SEN'1'Bt
COtWff Ofd' DENTON
That The City of Denton, Texas, a Municipal Corporation
of the County of Denton State of Texas , for and 6t considoratlon of
the sum of
TEN AND N01100 ($10.w) ..--------DOId.ARS
,
to it In hand paid by Hazel Young, Alice Alexander and Daisy Punch
have Granted, Sold and Conveyed, and by tlieso presenld lu Grunt, Sell and Convey unto the aaid Hazel
Young, Alice Alexander and Daisy Punch
of the County of Denton State of Texas all that certain
tract or parhal of land situated in the Wm, Loving Survey, Abstract
759, Denton -^.ounty, Texas, being a part of a certain (called) 0,379
acre tract deeded by Saddie L. Moore, at al to the City of Denton
Texas on the 22id day of December, 1969 recorded in Volume 596, Page
104 deed recortio of said county, and being more fully described as
folfowsl
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said 0,379 acre tract, said point
lying in the south boundary lino of west Prairie Street;
THENCE aouth 00°26'52" east a distance of 155,12 feet to a point in a
called 20 foot glley-
THENCE south 899'411 west a distance of 40.0 feet to an iron pin;
THENCE north 00026152" west, 10 feet from and parallel with the east
curb of Carroll Poulevard, a distance of 155,20 foot to an iron pin;
THENCE north 89 45'57" east a distance of 40.0 feet to the point of
beginning and containing 0,142 acre of land,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all And singular, the rights
and appurtenances thereto in anywise belonging unto the said City of Denton, TeXAa , a
Municipal Corporation, its successors and aisigns
bataanixnioor forever= and it does abeheroby bind its e;tccesrors and assign:.
~~It4trtkto Warrant and Forever Defend all and singular the sald premises
unto the said Hazel Young, Alice Alexander4 and Daisy Punch, their
heir. end assigns, agafnst every person whomsoever lawfully claiming, or to claim the came or e.ny pert
thereof.
Witness my hand at Denton County, Texas
on this day of December A. D. to 84
Witnesses at Bequest of Orantorr THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTr eYi
CHARLOTTE ALUM, CITY SECRETARY -i-- _
9,42E
i
N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONINO DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOA
APPROXIMATELY 17.1 ACRES OF LAND, A$ MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
WkEIN FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (PD) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION; .A.ND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS;
SECTION I.
That the lining district classification of the property
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
b reference, id hereby changed from agricultural (A) district
classification to planned development {1'U} disrclct classification.
SECTION IT,
That prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for
the use of any building or structure within the planned development
« district the following conditions shall be met;
1. Perimeter street pavicig requirements shall be
imposed along the entire frontage of Paige Road,
2. Estate road conditions will be imposed on Swisher
Road-a pavement width of twenty-four (24) feet
without curbs is allowed for one acre lots with one
hundred (100) feet or more frontage for single
family use,
3. A six (6) foot solid fence will be erected along the
south bboundary line of this development where it
abuts Shiloh Cemetery.
SY,C'TION III.
That the planned development district shall be developed in
substantial compliance with the silo plan attached horeto and
incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change to in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its poouliar
toLtability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texaa, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the planning and zoning
Z-1694/CURTIS D. HODGSON/PAGE I
r.
Commission And the City Council of the City of Dentoti,, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTr
7ARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM;
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY;
Z-1694/CURTIS D. HODGSON/PACE 2
Rob
,,N
A 1 I/ l II I I I / 1 1 ~ l j, I 1 1 I i I''.
1 ! J.vJ~I ♦w~ '
wr...~4}.. w w~~ • • 1
1 ~ t JQtI
i
t
I
1• i
t DATAI
Sv.! Total Grass .-lcres +r.,o
~l
.r 'll Total S•7 Lots i3
rrtvnt,onl Total E rate Lots lk
Pond ! Retention Pond 1. ac.
ROW Dedicutmn 1,69 ac,
i
V
r ~ i •AOf~1 an Ipprox,male' .44
•O
1 ~ NOIICf 111'1J/~'
1 r1 i ~ ~ cQUHrY
~ II \ I Y JI JIMf
Vicinity `lop
ROLLYNGWOOD
t
ESTATES
An Addition to the City of Denton,Texas
Developer, 1
RWGPI INC,
3336 Alpha Rd
Dallas,Texas 73240
Contact, Curtis Hodgso,i
»14/960^2791
Z-1694/CURTIS D, HODGSON/PAGr 3
EX1i2EiT iiA"
To all that certain treat or ppaareal of land situated in the Gideon Walker
Survey, Ab. No. 1330, in the County of Denton, Texas and being more particularly
described as followso
BEGINNING at an iron rod in or near the center line of Page Road at the Northeast
corner of a 160 acre tract conveyed to Mrs. Morthe Thurman by John R. Henrys
THENCE South 87 degrees 53 minutes 19 seconds East along or near the center line
of Page Road a distance of It 172.20 feet to an iron rod for corner=
THENCE South 03 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds West varying from the East side of
Swisher Road and back to the approximate center line of Swisher Road a distance
of 1,09001 feet to a nail for angle point in or near the intersection of Swisher
Road and Chapparal Drive;
THENCE South 01 degree 21 minutes 18 seconds West along or near the center line
of Swisher Road a distance of 1. 148.87 feet to a point for corner at the Northeast
corner of Shiloh Cemetery;
THENCE North 86 degrees 41 minutes 15 seconds West along or near a fence a distance
of 137.00 feet with the North line of Shiloh Cemetery to a point for corner=
THENCE along a curve to the left having a central angle of 70 degrees 50 minutes,
32 seconds, a radius of 290.00 feet, a tangent of 206.25 feet a chord bearing of
North 22 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds West, and a chord length of 336.16 feet to
a point for corner;
THENCE North 14 degrees 55 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 77.62 feet to a
point for corners
THENCE North 04 degrees 58 minutes 11 seconds East a distance of 46.17 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North s distance of 28.50 feet to an angle point;
THENCE North 11 degrees 22 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of 91.29 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North 04 degrees 05 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 28.07 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North 02 degrees 29 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 69.07 feet to
a point of curvature;
THENCE along a curve to the left having a central angle of 56 degrees 36 minutes
31 seconds, a radius of 122.00 feet, a tangent of 65.70 feet, a chord bearing of
North 14 degrees 31 minutes West, and a chord length of 115.69 feet to a point
for corner;
THENCE North 08 degrees 10 minutes 57 seconds West a di stance oe 309,15 feet to
an aallis point;
THENCE North 06 degrees 06 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 28.16 feet to
an angle point;
Z-1694/CnTIS D, HODGSON/PAGE 4
' 'Tt iioeh a distance of,~►~.00 test to to "$I* point=
'1ytM North 10 degrees 04 obuta 50 seconds gait a distance of 91.41 feet to
an angio point
THEM North Ol degrees 11 minutes 37 seconds Nast a distance of 48.01 feet to
an angl$ point,
71MWM North 05 degrees 55 minutes 53 seconds West a distance of 77,41 feet to
a point for corner{
THENCE along a curve to 'the rigyht having a central an le of 86 degr"s 43 minutes
37 seconds,' a radius of 68.00 feet, a tangent of 64,21 feet, a chord bearing of
North 43 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds West and a chord length of 93.38 feat
to a point of reverse curvature]
THOM along a curve to the left having a central antl♦ of 52 degrees 49 minutes#
a radius of 15.00 feet, a tangent of 7.45 feet, a chord bearing of North 12 degrees
59 minutes 31 seconds west, and a chord length of 13,34 feet to a point of tangencrt
THENCE North 21 degrees 15 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 19.31 feet to
a point of curvature{
THENNCE'slong a curve to the right having a central as la of 76 degrees 19 minutes
22 seconds, a radius of 65.00 feet, a tangent of 51.08 feet, a chord beariag of
North 18 degrees 53 minutes 10 seconds East, and a chord distance of 80.32 feet
to 0 point of tangency;
THENCE North 70 degrees 36 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 57.25 feet to
an angle pointl
THENCE North 77 degrees 59 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 48.05 feet to
a point of curvature=
THENCE along a curve to the left having a central angle of 74 degrees 19 minutes
20 seconds, s radius of 170.0 feet, a tangent of 128.86 feet, a chord bearing
of North 39 degrees 16 minutes 11 seconds east, and a chord distance of 205.38
feet to s point of tangencyl
THENCE North 03 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds East a distance of 375.13 feet to
s point for corned
THENCE North 87 degrees 53 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 972.20 feet
to a point for corned
THENCE North 02,degrees East a distance of 145.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING
and enclosing in all 17.1 acres, more or less.
z-1694/CURTIS D. HODGSON/PAGE '5
953x.
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONINQ MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONINQ DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR
APPR691MATRLY 49,41 ACRES OF LAND, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN FROM AGRIOULTUL (A) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (PD) DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION, ANC rROVIDINO FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE. vk
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the zoning district classification of the property
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference, to hereby changed from agtlculturnl (A) district
classification to planned development (PD) distrlot'elasstfication.
SECTION It.
That prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for
the use of any building or structure within the pladned development
district. the following conditions shall be mete
1. Street widths within the development must be thirty-one
(31) feet.
2. Proposed street alignw,nts meet be approved by the City
Transportation Engineer and final approval of parking
shall be reviewed by the Development Review Committee,
3. Perimeter street paving requirements along the entire
frontsgge of Shady Shores Road (dedication by developer
of fiFty (50) feet of right-of-way) shall be imposed
during the platting process.
4. An eight (O) foot masonry/wood fence must bo erected
along the southern property line on Shady Shores Road.
5. Trees shall be planted every twenty (20) feet along the
eastern and northern boundaries of the property between
this proposal and the proposed SF-7 and one acre estate
lots.
6. Setbacks shall be as follows:
Front: fifteen (15) feet
Rear; ten 10) feet
Side, six 6) feet.
7. Maximum lot coverage allowed will be forty (40) percent.
8. No building, dwelling, structure, or fences shall be
built or placed on a lot without the approval of the
Homeowners' Association.
9. Any dwelling which is erected or placed on a lot shall
contain at Ieaet 900 square feet of living apace, shall,
have a roof with at least a 3/12 pitch, shall have a
shingle roof (no metal or 'gravel'), and shall have wood
or masonry exterior (no metal).
Z-1695/CURTIS D. HODOSON/PACE 1
r
10. Any dwelling which is erected or placed on a lot shalli
(a) be $et at a distance of not more than twenty-five
(25) feet and not less than fifteen (15) foot from
the street unless such placement is impossible due
to utility easements; and
(b) be permanently attached to a concrete foundation;
and
(c) be finished or skirted to the gground with it
material which is color-coordinated iiith the
dwelling. The exact placomont of any dwol;ing or
building on any lot shall first be approved by the
Homeowners' Association.
11. All lots will be landscaped with grass, shrubs, trees,
decorative stone, bark or other mate ral desi;;ned for
landscaping. 'flee landscaping shall at all tlmes be
maintained, which maintenance sootIl include;
(a) regular mowing and watering of grass;
(b) raking loaves;
(c) trimming trees and shrubs;
(d) edging along road, concrete and shrub boils;
(o) trimming along buildings; and
(f) sweeping and cleaning walks and drives.
12. No trash, debris, auto parts tools, equipment,
vehicles, bicycles, or toys shalt be kept on any lot
within view of the street or within view of adjacent
property.
13. No antenna may be installed on any lot which extends
for more than fifteen (15 )feet above the dwelling.
14. No parson may live on or about any lot for more than
thirty (30) days in any twelve (12) month period
unless said person is the owner of the lot or a member
of the Immediate family of the owner of the lot. No
renting:
15. All structures on any lot shall be kept in good repair,
16. Any fence constructed on any lot shall be of wood or
6asonry, shall not exceed six (6) feet in height, and
shall be no closer tha- thirty (30) feet to the street.
17. No towels, rugs, or laundry shall be hunt- on or about
any lot in such a manner that is visU le from the
street.
.
18, No mo"o than two (2) four logged pets may be kept on
any lot. The owner of each lot: shall keep his pets on
his property and shall insure that the pets stay off
of the common areas.
19. if steps are required to enter the dwelling and the
steps are visible from the street, then the steps must
z-1695/CURTIS D. RODGSON/PAGE 2
be mado o` concrete or sa.isonry, AlternativoAy, a
wooden dock arrangement may be ai ad which has as part
of its structure steps which are roads of wood, provided
that the deck has at least 80 square foot of i':oor
area and provided, further, that. the (look arrangement
be built in a good workmanlike manner with materials
designed for outside use. Otherwise, no wooden steps
are permitted,
20, The owner of each lot, his family, and his guests,
shall at all times co 'I with those covenants and
restrictions, and shallmp likewise comply with all rules
which the Homeowners' Association adopts,
SECTION III:
That tho planned development district shall be developed in
substatntial compliance with the site plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein by refeeonce,
SECTION IV,
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finda that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens,
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having hereto ore been held by the Planning and 'Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984,
i
RICHARD 0. i
,7MWM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CWtOTTE ) CITY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: OOL~
Z-1695/CURTIS D. HODGSON/PAGE 3
Rood
r.M~Ne M•1 NMti~M
0 100 tdp 700
I
f fi ul' 1~ Tul9l 17fu94 .1Cfe~ 49.4 1
Total No. tit Lott 276
.\lin.Lut Width Id
/ Site 11,400
AVERAGE 40T 512E $404
ClImmun .\re'a 2.i7
1 9. (pool.pa,ihun•pJrk•
Yrtun helU.fenml)
/ lrea in S:rceta 6.20 .1:.
I
J ~ a~ ` ' ~ 1+ yl l I ~~1 1
r \ E
%
/ y'icanuy ~IJy
PROPOSED PO
,hlluh ROI.L1NGNIVUOD
i cemeter> ESTATES 1
Developer, y 1~ lr, .1n ;liddirtmon to the City of Dewon, Te\JN
WoP. INC. 3336 .1kiph9 Rd.
ContAl (T'urrtli Hi),ji~ In J Shady Shines ~RoAd~ W
r ~4) 96+>' 2ti 91
Z-1695/CURTZS D, HODGSON/PAGE 4
EXI:IBIT "A" 0
SO VEYOR'S NOTES
~t
To all that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Gideon Walker
Survey, Ab. No, 1330, in the County of Denton, Texas and bfing more particularly
described as follows;
BEGINNING at an iron rod in or near the center line of Page Road at the Northeast
corner of a 160 acre tract conveyed to Mrs. Martha Thurrwo by John R, Henry;
THENCE South 87 degrees 53 minutes 19 seconds East along or near the center line
of Page Road a distance of 1, 172,20 feet to an iron rod for corner=
THENCE.South 03 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds West varying from the East side :~f
Swisher Road and back to the approximate center line of Swisher Road a distance
of 1,090,31 feet to a nail for angle point in or near the intersection of Swisher
Road and Chapparal Drive;
THENCE South 01 degree 21 minutes 18 seconds West along or near the cc-uter line
of Swisher Road a distance of 1, 148,87 feet to a point for corner at the Northeast
corner of Shiloh Cemetery;
THENCE North 86 degrees 41 minutes 15 seconds West along or near a fence a distance
of 137,00 feet with the North line of Shiloh Cemetery to a point for corner;
THENCE along a curve to the left having a central angle of 70 degrees 50 minutes,
32 seconds, a radius of 290.00 feet, a tangent of 206.25 feet a chord bearing of
North 22 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds West, and a chord length of 336.16 feet to
a point for corner;
THENCE North 14 degrees 55 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 77.62 feet to a
point for corner;
THENCE North 04 degrees 58 minutes 11 seconds East a distance of 46.17 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North a distance of 28.50 feet to an angle point;
THENCE North 11 degrees 22 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of 91.29 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North 04 degrees 05 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 28,07 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North 02 degrees 29 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 69.07 feet to
a point of curvature;
THENCE along a curve to the left having a central angle of 56 degrees 36 minutes
31 seconds, a radius of 122,00 feet, a tangent of 65.70 feet, a chord bearing of
North 14 degrees 31 minutes West, and a chord length of 115.69 feet to a point
for corner;
THENCE North 08 degrees 10 minutes 57 seconds West a distance of 309.15 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North 06 degrees 06 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 28.16 feet to
an angle point;
Z-1695/CURTIS D, HODGSON/PAGE 5
> XH%$IT` "Ali'
THENCE North a distance of 47900 foot to an 44614 point;
00
THENCE North 10 degrees 04 Vinutee $0 seconds East a distance of 91.41 feet to
an angle point)
THENCE North 01 degrees 11 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 48.01 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North 05 degrees 55 minutes 53 seconds West a distance of 77.41 feet to
a point for corner;
THENCE along a curve to the right having a central angle of 86 degrees 43 minutes
37 seconds, a radius of 68.00 feet, a tangent of 64.22 feet, a chord bearing of
North 43 degrees 15 minutes 52 seconds West and a chord length of 93.38 feet
to a point of reverse curvature;
THENCE along a curve to the left having a central angle of 52 degrees 49 minutes,
a radius of 15.00 feet, e, tangent of 7.45 feet, a chord bearing of North 12 degrees
59 minutes 31 seconds West, and a chord length of 13,34 feet to a point of tangency:
THENCE North 21 degrees 15 minutes 06 seconds West a distance of 19.31 feet to
a point of curvature;
THENCE along a curve to the right having a central angle of 76 degrees 19 minutes
22 seconds, a radius of 65.00 feet, a tangent of 51,08 feet, a chord bearing of
North 18 degrees 53 minutes 10 seconds East, and a chord distance of 80.32 feet
to a point of tangency]
THENCE North 70 degrees 36 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 57.25 feet to
an angle point;
THENCE North 77 degrees 59 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 48.05 feet to
a point of curvature;
THENCE along a curve to the left having a central angle of 74 degrees 19 minutes
20 seconds, a radius of 170.0 feet, a tangent of 128.86 feet, a chord bearing
of North 39 degrees 16 minutes 11 seconds east, Ind a chord distance of 205.38
feet to a point of tangency;
THENCE North 03 degrees 29 minutes 57 seconds East a distance of 375.13 feet to
a point for corner;
THENCE North 87 degrees 53 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 972.20 feet
to a point for corner;
THENCE South 02 degrees West a distance of 2,168.42 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE. along a curve to the right, having a central angle of. 12 degrees 14 minutes,
15 seconds, a radius of 20914.79 feet, a length of 622.55 feet a chord bearing of
South 37 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds East, and a chord distance of 621.37 feet
to a point for corner;
THENCE South 86 degrees 49 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 585,27 feet
with the North right-of-way of Shady Shores Road to a point for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 01 seconds West a distance of 426,10 feet to
a point for corner;
THENCE South 86 degrees 41 minutes 15 seconds East a distance of 68,44 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING and enclosing in all 49.41 acres of land.
z-1695/CURTIS D. IiODGSON/PAGE 6
CIrvot oBNTON, rEXA$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DE'NTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (P;7i 566.8200
Office of the City Manager
M E M 0 R A iN D U M
10; Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager
FROM; Vic Boyer, Administrative Assistant
DATE; December 12, 1984
SUBJECT; Texas Municipal League Region VIIJ. Conference
The attached ordinance has been drafted in order to allow an
expenditure which may exceed $3,000 for the 'texas Municipal
League Region 8 meeting that we will host on January 17, 1985,
1'he expenditure will be for the dinner costa of $11,15 per
person, If over 270 persons attend, the expenditure for food
will exceed the $3,000 limit that requires Cityy Council
approval, Please note that whatever the final total ls) all of
it will oe paid for tram ticket revenues,
Please let me Know if you have any questions on this matter,
Victor M, Boyer U
Administrative Assistant
lj
Attachment
2043M
' 00501+.
^
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE. OF FUNDS BY THE CITY OF
DENTON FOR HOSTING A BUSINESS MEETING AND BANQUET FOR THE TEXAS
MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, REGION 8; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council will be hosting a business meeting
and banquet for the Texas Municipal League, Region 8; and
WHEREAS, Section 2,36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas requires that every act of the Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness
shall be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS;
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves the expenditure of
funds in an amount in excess of $3,000 for expenses in hosting
the Texas Municipal League, Region 8 meating.
SECTION It.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval..
POSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1984.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTESTi
Ct MLOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETM
CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS
BY:
RE S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the Director of the Personnel/Employae Relations
Deppartment for the City of Denton, Texas has presented a proposed
policy regarding employee vacation/bonus time for consideration by
the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt such policy to
replace the existing policy on employee vaoetion/bonus time
adopted by the Council by Reeolur,ion on August 21, 1984;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTON$ TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1.
The following policy, attached hereto and made a part hereof.,
is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of Denton,
Texaar
Vaoation/Bonus Time (Reference No. 107.03)
SECTION II.
The foregoing policy 4 attached hereto and made a part hereof
aid shall be filed in the official records of the City of Denton
w 'th the City Secretary.
SECTION III.
The policy entitled vacation/bonus time adopted by Revolution
on August 21, 1984 is hereby rescinded.
SECTION IV.
This Resolution shall be effective immediately after its date
of passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day o` , 1984.
KICWD 0. STEWART~ MAY 9
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST;
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE n. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONt TEXAS
BY I~MWf 6. , ~ L-.
V I TY (J#'dENT6AP PAGE i Oa
POLIMADI11NISTRATIVE PROOEDIIRE/ADMINIATRATIVE DIREOTIVX
a'~liPL~RENC~
SECTION NUMBER:
VKRSONNEG/EMP1,OYEE RMI.ATIONS 107.03
EFFtiCTIVE DALE:
SUBJECT:
WAGE AND SALARY PI.AN 12 18 84
REPLACES
TITLE:
VACATION/BONUS 'l'l.ME 8-21-•84
POLICY STATKMENTI
VgcatLii,on.
It is the policy of the City of Denton to provide vacation pay and flours to all
regular employees who have completed six (6) full months of employment, Vacation
hours for eligible employees are accrued on a monthly basis. Pay in lieu of
taking vacation is not permitted except upon termination.
An employee is not 'eligible to receive or use vacation hours until he or she bas
completed six (6) full months of regular employment. Vacation hours may not be
used in advance of the hours being accrued.
Vacation time for full-timo non-Civil Service employees is currently accrued at,
the mite of eight (8) hours pov month of continuous service. The following
schedule indicates future increases in monthly accruals for non-civil service
nmployoest
8ffectiv-e Date Monihly_ Accryal Rite
February 1, 1985 9 hours per month
June 1, 1986 10 hours per month
The intent of this vacation benefit is to provide time away from the work
environment to puraue activities that will promote the well--being of the
individual and good physical, mental, and emotional health. In accordance with
this provision, all full-time regular employees will be required to take at ).east
five (5) days of vacation per year.
Vacation accrual rates for Civil Service employees are covered in Vernon's
Annotated Civil. Statutes Article 1269, Section 3•-2.1.
1Bonus Time
In addition to regular vacation, the city of Denton also awards bonus time to
regular full-time non-Civil Service employees who 'have completed five (5)
continuous years of full-time (part--time employees are not eligible for this
benefit) service to the City. Upon completion of five (5) years of continuous
sovvice, each employee shall receive four (4) hours bonus time. For every year of
continuous service thereafter the employee will receive an additional four (4)
hours for successive years beyond the fifth anniversary.
Pnga 2 '0~._.4 .
PIOLIMADMINIS:RATIVE FROCI DUR£/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRE-0TIVbI (potttlauad)
TITM NUM88AI
107.03
F x riigpLg, ~
Dentin _Awar4
5th Anniversary 4 [{ours
6th Annivorsary 8 Hours
7th Anniversary... 12 Hours,.,
't'his award conLinues until regulate full.-time servico with the Cit;, has ended,
Bonus Lime Is tiwavdod annually on the employoos' anni.vovaary date. Pay in liou
of taking bonus Limu is not permitted except upon LovmtnaLi.on.
Civil Service employoos are eligible for bonus ti.mo a'ter the completion of Len
(10) years of continuous service, Bonus accruals will begin on the tonth
anniversary and continue for each year of continuous service. Bonus accrual
rates for Civil Service employees aret
Police 4 hours par year
Fire 6 hours* per year
* {Proration based on twelve (12) hours equal one (1) day which is the calculation
used to dotermine hourly rate.)
Bonus accruals are four (4) hours (6 hours Fire) per year for ovary year of
continuous service and are awarded annually on the employees' anniversary date,
hffeeLivo OcLobov 1, 14871 Civil Service employoos will begin accruing bonus Lima
on the fifth anniversary (five years of continuous service),
Maximum Carry-Over
The maximum allowed carry-over of vacation and bonus Lime is 320 hours per
calendar year (January through Docembev) for all non--Civil service elployees and
Police Civil Service employees. Fire Civil Service employees shall be allowed 490
hours per calendar year. An employee may accrue as many hours of vacation as
possible throughout the calendar year; however, it is the employee's
responsibility to ensure that their accrual is below the maximum allowable {tours
by Decembov 31 of any particular year,
Regular Part-Time Employees (Includes 1/2 and 3/4 time workers)
Part time employees accrue prorated vacation hours determined by their budgeted
pay classification: half time - 4 hours; three quarters = 6 'lours. These
employees will not accrue bonus time.
Employees holding more than one part-time position may not accrue more vacation
hours per month than a full--Lima employee. (Soo Part•-Time Policy 0.06.08).
Seasonal and Temporary Employees
Temporary and seasonal employees shall not earn or accrue vacation/bonus time or
be entiLled to vacation/bonus time pay upon separation.
{
b~
CITY& Dkh:NTON, T XAS MUNICIPAL 13UILOING ~ D NON, TEXAS 7620) ~ muzP110NE (817) 566.8200
MEMORANDUM
__•-.-r
T0; Betty McKean, Assistant
City Manager
FROM; Kathryn Usrey, Director
Personnel/Employee Relations
DATE: December 4, 1984
SUBJECT; Vacation/Bonus Time Policy
Attached is a draft of the Vacation/Bonus Time Policy with proposed changed
incorporated, The draft includes changes to incorporate recommenc,i'tons from the
City Attorney's office as well as suggestions from the Police and Fire
Departments, The City Attorney recommended wording changes to clarify rules
regarding accrual, in particular, with Civil Service employees, That
clarification has been provided, The major changes in this policy come from
discussions in the Fire and Police Departments,
You will recall that the policy adopted was met with considerable dissatisfaction
from the Fire Department, since they felt it reduced their benefits. After
considerable discussion and research, it was determined that the only way to make
this policy fair to all employees was to increase the vacation benefit of
Non-Civil Service employees to the level of Civil Service employees, To
accomplish this goal of equalizing vacation benefits, we are proposing two things;
1. Increase Non-Civil Service vacation accrual from twelve (12) days
per year to fifteen (15) days per year,-- -
2. Reduce the number of years of continuous service needed for Civil
Service employees to be eligible for bonus time from ten (10)
years to five (5) years,
The increase in Non-Civil Service vacation accruals will be spread across three
(3) years (eight hours or one day per year) as indicated below.
FY ADDITIONAL HOURS NEEDED RATE OF ACCRUAL EFFECTIVE DATE
PER YEAR PER MONTH
1983-84 «0- 8
1984-85 8 (1,day) 9 February l 1985
1985-86 16 (2 days) 10 June 1, 1986
1986-87 24 (3 days) 10
Page 2
December 4, 1984
Vacation/Bonus Time
By increasing the accrual rate to nine (9) hours a month on rebruary 1, 19850 the
employees will accrual an additional eight hours or one day by the c:nd of
September, 1985, During riscal Year 85/86 employees will need to accrue an
additional sixteen (16) hours over our current accruals. The nine (9) hour
accrual rate will produce an additional twelve (12) hours by the end of September
1986, Since sixteen (16) hours are needed the rate of accrual will be increased
to ton (10) for the last four months (from June 1, 1986), During the last year
the accrual rate will remain at ten for the full twelve months to add the
necessary twenty four hours or three days.
Once the Non-Civil Service vacation benefit is fifteen days per year (October 1,
1987)9 the bonus time rules for Civil Service employees will change from ten years
to five years,
One other addition to this policy is the requirement that employees use five days
vacation per year, The intention of this requirement is to 1) further the intent
of this benefit, and 2) to help avoid the employee losing any Jacation/bonus time
due to excesiA ve accruals, Although it will not eliminate the latter problem it
will help prolong an individual accruing the maximum number of houq,,that can be
carried over.
Our intention is `to take this policy back to City Council for adoption on December
180 1984, Should you have any further questions or concerns regarding this
policy, please let me know,
tVAyn
_Dir
ector
onnel/Employee Relations
KU/ch
2259P/0050P
R F S 0 L U T I 0 N
WHEREAS, the regular Council meeting )f the City of Denton
scheduled January 1, 1985 is an official holiday, therefore, it
is necessary that the Council meeting for such date be postponed
until January 8, 1985; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the regular Council meeting to be held on January 1,
1985 be postponed until January 8, 1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of December, 1984,
RICHARD 0,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALUNI CITY RETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL. FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.
~i
ciryof oammN, rags MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 06N TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELr:PHONE (817) 566,8200
M E M O R A N D U M
A M O Y 01 m O p O
DATE : December 13, 1984
'ICU: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: John F. McGrane, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Hack Up Information For Counoi.l Agenda
I have just been informed by the auditors Arthur Andersen 4
Co., that we will not have any backup information regarding the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report tri time to be sent with
the agenda. It is anticipated that a final draft of this
information will arrive either Friday, December 14th or
Saturday, December 15th. This information will then be
delivered to the Council by special cour:;.er and, in addition, a
final copy will then be provided to Council at the Council
meeting Tuesday evening.
If you have any questions, please advise.
c
JFMcG/cyb
1309F
C/TYol DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (8171566-8200
M E M O R A N D U M
TO; City Council
FROM; Jerry Clark, City Engineer
DA'T'E: November 26, 1984
RE; Wye-Robertson Railroad crossing
A small drawing of this area is enclosed. W e and Robertson
Streets run parallel up to the railroad crossing at the minor
crest of a small hill. Jackson Street also comes into the
intersection less than fifty feet to the east. The end result
of all these streets coming together at a railroad crossing on
a small crest makes proper intersection design very diffinult,
We have addressed the problem through field data gathering and
some preliminary designs of the possible connections, We did
not arrive at a design that would meet AASTO standards, city
subdivision regulations) or good engineering practice,
't'herefore, we are recommending the current connection of Wye
and Robertson at the railroad tracks be closed, Another
railroad crossing exists at Morse and Hill Street only 400 feet
to the south, Wye Street, which is not heavily traveled runs
directly to this crossing.
It is the recommendation of the City Staff that the Wye and
Robertson connection be closed based on the details above, The
work if approved will be accomplished through the CDBG
Robertson Street project fit a small costs saving from leaving
the connection.
Please advise if further information is needed,
Jerr / Clor
City Engineer
is
NU266E
13 I
14
r:S s
MMAWIN
10
19 18 17
rl~.g
~I
10
LA.
+E \ 4 C96 7
I a
low
s ~ 239 ~:z. \
2 P
2 7
'~*t b ..b i`• ,,fit .:~}~,y
ART I.,
EAST MILL ~?o.:.~ •'~b~~` ;
it 60
12 12.1 too' 56 , cr. Sd ao' so, Sol no
m I 2 3 4
6 g. 7 e 9 10
P & Z Minutes
November 14, 1984
Page 7
C,r~{eke a recommendation to the City Council on the
ppreposed
ob aloslng of the intersection of Wye and
n
D~ lertso streets,
Mr, Clark stated Wye and Robertson Streets run parallel
C p, up to the railroad orossing at the minor crest of a
small hill, lie stated Jackson Street also comes into
,the intersection less than 50' to tile .oast, The end
roadlcrossing onuaeSmallecrestmmakeatether .
oproper iiitersocrion
design very d.iffinult, flu stated they did not arrive at
a design that would meet AASTO standards, city subdi,vi-
Sion eogulations, or good engineering
Core, we ere recommending the current oo~osorion ofaty
and Robertson at the railroad tracks be closed. AnutlIor
railroad crossing exists at Morse and Hill Street only
400 feet to the south, Wye Street, which is not heavily
traveled runs directly to this orossing,' He further
stated the work if approved will be accomplished through
the CD80 Robertson Street project at P, Small costs Sav-
ng from leaving the connection,
Mr, LaPorte made a motion to recommend t{1e proposed
closing of the intersection of Wye and Robertson
Streets. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried
(5.0).
l). Make a recommendation to the City Council regarding
the proposed voluntary annexation of 31,02; acres
located at the southwest corner of Ryan Road and
Teasley Lane (FM 2181) (A-8),
Mr, Ellison stated this is a voluntary annexation
petition for 31.027 acres located at the southwest
corner of Ryan Road and Teasley Lane (FM 2181), lie
stated the owner of the tract, Mr, B.L. Archer, has
submitted a change of zoning request which if appproved
will permit 17 acres of air;gle family land use, 10 acres
of multi-family cluster housing, and four acres of
general retail and neighborhood service land use. He
further stated the Planning and Community Development
Department recommends approval of this annexation
request.
Mr. LaPorte made a motion to recommend approval. of 'the
proposed voluntary annexation of 31.027 acres loct::ed at
Secondedl1bysMr. ClaiborneyandRunanimouslyscarriede(5.0).
E. Make a recommendation to the City Council concerning
the proposed annexation of approximately 5 acres of
land located north of Highway 380 west and adjacent
and west of Masch Branch Road (A-9),
Mr, Ellison stated staff has received a preliminary plat
of a proposed five acre office development which is a
portion Inc. a 69 ac preliminary owned by fri-Steel Struc-
tures, Addition (five acre tokfiaes site) Shass been
reviewed and accepted by thz Deve'lopmeut Review Commit-
tee and approved by resolution of the City Council,
He atated due' Co the locstion of this property in
relation to the Denton' Municipal Airport, he
Development Review Committee requested submission of
a general development plan for the entire parcel. He
stated it has been the practice of the City Council