HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-14-1985
o-'
1 '
1
f
I
t
I
f `
I
MMfD DYt
Empire Microfilm Company
Dallas, Texas
214-243-6 173
ol
1
AGENDA PACKET CITY COUNCIL 05/14/85
n
i '
h
1
C
I ,
14
I
I
I
1 AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
May 14, 1985
regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
May 14, 1985, at 7:UU p.m. iri the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:OU p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of Apri1 16, 1985 and the Special Called
Meeting of April 23, 1985.
2. Consider approval of a resolution approving an
agreement between the Gity of Denton and North Texas
+ State University for solid waste collection and
disposal services.
3, Consent Agenda:
approval thereoftwill ibe rstrictlyeon bthethbasisaof the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase )rders to be approved for
1 payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
1 10.A1 and 10.81. This listing Is provided on the Consent
Agenda to allow Council Members ;o discuss any item prior to
approval of the ordinance.
1. Bid # 9431A - Modular furniture panels
2, Bid # 9441 - Distribution transformers
3. Bid 6 9442 - Trailers
4. Bid # 9443 - Front load refuse truck
5. Bid # 9444 - Flail mower and tractor
6. 81d # 9446 - Traffic control cabinets
7, eid 9448 - Westgate Heights participa-
tion
8. Bid # 9449 - Aire, cutouts and pedestals
9. Bid # 9451 - Remote terminal unit/alarms
event pri,iter
V
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 14, 1965
Page Two
E 10. Bid d 9452 - Electrical terminators
11. Bid # 5455 - Water and s,iwer su;.plies
12. Bid # 9456 - Painting of trucks and
trailers
13. Bid Y 9458 - Line puller tensioner
I' 14. Purchase Order 0 66974 to Borg-Warner Air
Conditioning in the amount of $8,791.88
I,
15. Construction inr the amount6oft$6,500tUOOrcreek
16. Purchase Order # 679e3 to Trans Tex Supply
t Company in the amount of $7,251.UO
17. DPurchase Order # istributing in the amount 7of y $4,235.59watsu~
8. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of final replat of the Bellaire
Heights Phase One Addition, Lot 16, Block
C. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary plat of the Johnson
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Horthside Addition, Lots 6-15, Block 4.
(The Planning and Toning Commission
recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the W. J. Wheeler Addition, Lot 7A, Block
1. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
5. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
tpp Wimbleton Village Addition, Phase IV9
Tract A, Lot 1, Block 14. (The Planning and
Zoning commission recommends approval.)
4. Presentation of awards from the Texas Safety
Association to City of Denton departments.
5. Presentation by the Chamber of Commerce Convention and
Visitors Bureau of their proposed budget and plan for
the new year.
1k
I
F.
t city of Denton City Council Anenda
May 14, 1985
F Page Three
6. Presentation by the Chamber of Commerce on the
Leadership Denton Program.
Consider approval of use of Mack Park with fees waived
( for a softball tournament with all profits to go to
the Fred Moore Scholarship Fund.
g, Consider approval of a request to hang a banner across
( Avenue E to welcome students to NTSU.
r~ 9, Public Hearings:
' A. reque. Consader change the petinionzoninga fRocca rom Pena the 11
requesting
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development (PD) district on a 14.06 acre tract
I located along the east side of Riney Road,
adjacent and south of U.S. Highway 77, and north
of Windsor Drive, at a point beginning
I approximately 22G feet east of the intersection
of Riney Road and Windsor Drive. If approved,
r the planned development will permit the following
land uses:
i
sl single family detached lots on 10.6 acres
with a density of 2.9 units per acre
(minimum 8,UOJ square foot lots)
An 80 unit retirement center on 3.5 acres
acre.
with a density of 22.9 units
Commission
(The Planning and Zoning
approval.)
B. Y-14. Consider the petition of Ali Al -Khafaj -
requesting a variance of Article 4.15 of the City
of Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations Twith his tractsisc1 drainage
requirements.
on the west side of Duncan Street between Smith
Street and Dallas Drive. The tract is described
as Lot 1, Block 1, of the Al-KhafajiAbstractAddition 6and
shown in the S. C. Hirams Survey,
The lanning property yZonis zoned ing Commission mrecommends )denial.)
P
C. V-15. Consider the petition of J. P. Waygood
requesting a variance of Articles 4.03 and 4.15
of the City of Denton Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations requiring perimeter
street and drainage impruvements. This tract is
the northwest corner of
10.UO acres
Boone drae Street located and at Payne Drive. The tract is
10
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 14, 1965
Page Four
described as Block 1, Lot 1, of the Life
Tabernacle Addition a,-td shown in the Francis
zoned BatsSurveyt on Abstract 43the development of is
church is anticipated. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends denial.)
D. Public hearing concerning the ^etition of Hammett
A Nash, Inc. for annexation of approximately
361.708 acres situated in the H. May Survey,
Abstract 807, and the V. E. Oailor Survey,
i Abstract 452, and beginning west of FM 2164
ppximaiely 7,000 feet north of
(North Locust) ) (A-16).
Hercules
E. Public hearing concerning the petition of Hammett
b Nash, Inc. for annexation of approximately
180.98 acres situated in the John A. Burns
Survey, Abstract 130, and the Thomas Polk Survey,
Abstract 999, and beginning west of FM 2164
Nortn Locust) approximately 9,000 feet north of
j Hercules t.ane (A-19).
1 10. Ordinances;
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance acceptir
competitive bids and providing for the award or
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipoptnt, supplies or services and providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore.
B. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or service: in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bins.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting ►he
parking of vehicles on both sides of Hollyh1)1
between Londonderry and oodbrook. (The Citizens
Traffic Safety Support
approval.)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting
from stsf intersection twitheSInterstat SHighway
from 11
35-L Service Road to its intersection with
Londonderry. (The Citizens Traffic Safety
Support Commission recommends approval.)
r
1
V
City of Uenton City Council Agenda
May 14, 1985
Pag^ Five
E. Consider adoption of an ordinance temporarily
prohibiting two-way vehicular traffic on Airport
Road from Interstate Highway 35-W to the Denton
Municipal Airport and Airport Road from the
Airport to Interstate Hitghway 3511. (The Airport
Advisory Board recommends approval.)
f F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the
conveyance of 0.991 acres of real property to the
Town of Crass Roads in accordance with an
agreement previously approved on April 50 1983,
` between the City of Denton and the Town of Cross
Roads.
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the
zo,,ing map of the City of Denton, Texas, as same
was adopted as an appendix to the Code of
t Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, by
` ordinance No. 69-1, and as said map applies to
approximately 12.153 acres of land situated in
the Mary L. Austin Survey, Abstract No. 4, Denton
i } County, Texas and located at the northwest corner
of Spencer Road and Loop 288, to provide for a
change in zoning classification and use
designation froia planned development "Ph"
district classification and use to commercial"C"
i classification and use for said property.
Z-1728 (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement for the sale of wholesale treated water
to the Town of Corinth. (The Public Utilities
Board recommends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and Freese
and Nichols, Inc., for engineering services
f relative to the Water Treatment Plant. (The
Public Utilities Board recommends approval.)
J. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Uenton and Rone
Engineers to provide subsurface investigation
services for the City's sanitary landfill.
11. Resolutions;
A. Consider approval of a resolution approving an
Airport Use Agreement between the City of Denton
and the Confederate Air Force for the 1945
airshow. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends
approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenia
May 14, 1945
Page Six
B, Consider approval of a resolution authorizing a
Pipeline Licanse Agreement between the City of
Denton and Missouri-Kansa:•Texas Railroad Company.
I
C. C.nsider 6 proval of a resolution in support of
Senate Bill 1257, as introduced by Senator
McFarland, relating to the amendment of Sections
15.06 and 16.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure.
0. consider approval of a resolution recommending
the introduction of legislation to amend Article
2.Olb of the Texas Election Code to provide that
when the first Saturday in April falls on Easter
weekend, that elections may be held ooi the second
Saturday in April.
E. Consider approval of a resolution in support of
Project Texas and declaring May, 1985 as Project
Texas Month in the City of Denton.
12. Consider approval of Capital Improvements Plan Project
(CIP) #85-WW-6, Hobson lift station Change Order N1,
Bid 9351. (The Public Utilities Board recommends
approval.)
13. Consider approval of participation by the City of
Denton in the Sister Cities Program.
14. Consider revisions and/or amendments to the Charter of
. the City of Denton.
15. Official Action on Executive Session Items;
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
U. Board Appointments
16. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of 1985 at o'clock
(a.m. )
CITY 5LUKEIARY
1760C
i
AGENDA
CIT1 OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
May 14, 1985
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
May 14, 19i15, at 7:UU p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at wnich the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 16, 1985 and the Special Called
Meetins of April 23, 1985.
2. Consider approval of a resolution approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and North Texas
State University for solid waste collection and
disposal services.
3. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his c'esignee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
17) recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up information is atta.hed to the ordinances (Agenda items
10.A, and 10.8). This listing is provided on the Consent
Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to
approval of the ordinance,
1. Bid # 9431A - Modular furn~'ure panels
2. Bid f 9441 - Distribution transformers
3. Bid # 9442 - Trailers
4. Bid 9443 - Front load refuse truck
5. Bid 9444 - Flail mower and tractor
6. Bid f 9446 - Traffic control cabinets
7. did N 9448 - Westgate Heights participa-
tion
8. Bid f 9449 - Wire, cutouts and pedestals
9. Bid N 9451 - Remote terminal unit/alarms
event printer
10
.City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 14, 1965
Page Two
10. Bid # 9452 - Electrical terminators
11. did 0 9455 - Water and sewer supplies
12. Bid # 945b - Painting of trucks and
trailers
13. Bid d 9458 - Line puller tensioner
14. Purchase Order 0 66974 to Borg-Warner Air
Conditioning in the amount of $8,791.88
15. Purchase Order # 61178 to 8ittercreek
Construction in the amount of $6,500.00
16. Purchase Order N 67923 to Trans Tex Supply
Company in the amount of $7,251.00
17. Purchase Order 0 67979 to Watson
Distributing ';n the amount of $4,235.59
8. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of final replat of the Bellaire
Heights Phase One Addition, Lot 16, Block
C. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
2. Approval of preliminary plat of the Johnson
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary and final repplat of
the Northside Addition, Lots 6-15, 81ock 4.
(The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
4. Approval a1Jof Wheeleri preliminary final
Lot 7Ap1 Block
1.. (The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
5. Approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Wimbleton Village Addition, Phase IV,
Tract A, Lot 1, block 14. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Presentation of awards from the Texas Safety
Association to City of Denton departments.
S. Presentation by the Chamber of Commerce Convention and
Visitors Bureau of their proposed budget and plan for
the new year.
I
r'
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 14, 1985
E Page Tnree
F 6. Presentation by the Chaober of Commerce on the
Leadership Denton Program.
7. Consider approval of use of black Park with fees waived
f for a softball tournament with all profits to go to
the Fred Moore Scholarship Fund.
8. Consider approval of a request to hang a banner across
Avenue E to welcome students to NTSU.
9, Publ?c Hearings:
A. Z-1730. Consider the petition of Ana Rocca Pena
requesting a change in zoning from the
agricultural (A) classification to the planned
development PD) district on a 14.06 acre tract
` located along the east side of Riney Road,
adjacent and south of U.S. Highway 77, and north
of Windsor Drive, at a point beginning
approximately 220 feet east of the intersection
of Riney Road and Windsor Drive. If approved,
the planned development will permit the following
land uses:
31 single family detached lots on 10.6 acres
with a Jensity of 2.9 units per acre
(minimum 8,000 square foot lots)
An 80 unit retirement center on 3.5 acres
with a density of 22,9 units per acre.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
1 approval.)
I B. V-14, Consider the petition of Ali A1-Khafaji
requesting a variance of Article 4.15 of the City
of Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations with respect to drainage
requirements. This tract is 1,075 acres located
on the west side of Duncan Street between Smith
Street and Dallas Drive. The tract is described
as Lot 1, Block 1, of the A1-Khafaji Addition and
shown in the S. C. Hirams Survey, Abstract 616.
' The property is zoned commercial (C). (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial.)
C. V-15. Consider the petition of J. P. Haygood
requesting a variance of Articles 4,03 and 4,15
of the City of Denton Subdivision and Land
Development Regulations requiring perimeter
street and drainage improvements. This tract is
10.00 acres located at the northwest corner of
Bonnie Brae Street and Payne Drive. The tract is
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 14, 1985
Page Four
described as Block 1, Lot 1, of the Life
Tabernacle Addition and shown in the Francis
Batson Survey, Abstract 43. The property is
zoned agricultural (A) and the development of a
church is anticipated. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends denial.)
D. Public nearing concerning the petitiow of Hammett
A Nash, Inc. for annexation of approximately
361.708 acres situated in the H. May Survey,
Abstract 80.79 and the V. E. Gailor Survey,
Abstract 452, and beginning west of FM 2164
(North Locust) approximately 7,000 feet north of
Hercules Lane (A-16).
E. Public hearing concerning the petition of Hammett
y gash, Inc. for annexation of approximately
180.98 acres situated in the John A. Burns
Survey, Abstract 130, and the Thomas Polk Survey,
Abstract 999, and beginning west of FM 2164
(North Locust) approximately 9,000 feet north of
Hercules Lane (A-19).
10. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services and providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore.
8. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for
• the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases
of materials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting suci, purchases from requirements of
competitive bids.
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting the
parking of vehicles on both sides of Hollyhill
between Londonderry and Woodbrook. (The Citizens
Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends
approval.)
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance prohibiting
frominitsf intersecstion twitheSInterstat SHighway
35-E Service Road to its intersection with
Londonderry, (The Citizens Traffic Safety
Support Commission recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda
May 14, 1985
Page Five
E, Consider adoption of an ordinance temporarily
prohibiting two-way vehicular traffic on Airport
IE Road from Interstate Highway 35-W to the Denton
Municipal Airport and Airport Road from the
Airport to Interstate Hitghway 35W. (The Airport
Advisory Board recommends approval.)
F. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the
conveyance of 0.991 acres of real property to the
Town of Cross Roads in accordance with an
agreement previously approved on April 5, 1983,
between the City of Denton and the Town of Cross
Roads.
G. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending the
zoning map of the City of Denton, Texas, as same
was adopted as an appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Dei,ton, Texas, by
ordinance No. 69-1, and as said map applies to
approximately 12.153 acres of land situated in
the Mary L. Austin Survey, Abstract No. 4, Denton
County, Texas and located at the northwest corner
of Spencer Road and Loop 288; to provide for a
change in zoning classification and use
designation from planned development "PD"
district classification and use to commercial "C"
classification and use for said property.
Z-1728 (The PI arning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval.)
H. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement for the sale of wholesale treated water
to the Town of Corinth. (The Public Utilities
Board recommends approval.)
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and Freese
and Nichols, Inc., for engineering services
relative to the Water Treatment Plant. (The
Public Utilicies Board recommends approval.)
J. Consider adoption of an ordirance approving an
agreement between the City of Denton and Rone
Engineers to provide subsurface investigation
services fo:• the City's sanitary landfill.
11. Resolutions:
A, Consider approval of a resolution approving an
i Airport Use Agreement between the City of Denton
and the Confederate Air Force for the 1985
airshow. (The Airport Advisory Board recommends
approval.)
City of Denton City Council Agenda.
'May 14, 1985
Page Six
d. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing a
Pipeline License Agreement between the City of
Denton and Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company.
C. Consider approval of a resolution in support of
1 Senate Bill 1257, as introduced by Senator
McFarland, relating to the amendment of Sections
15.06 and 15.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure.
0. Consider approval of a resolution recommending
the introduction of legislation to amend Article
2.01 b of the Texas Election Code to provide that
when the first Saturday in April falls on Easter
weekend, that elections may be held on the second
Saturday in April.
E. Consider approval of a resolution in support of
Project Texas and declaring May, 1985 as Project
Te,ias Month in the City of Uenton.
12. Consider approval of Capital Improvements Plan Project
(CIP) #35-WW-6, Hobson lift station Change Order #1,
Bid 9351. (The Public Utilities Board recommends
' approval.)
r'
13. Consider approval of participation by the City of
Denton in the Sister Cities Program.
14. Consider revisions and/or amendments to the Charter of
the City of Denton.
15. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Leal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
0. Board Appointments
16. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was Y g posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of fi nton, Texas,
on the Jay of 1985 at o'clock
r (a.m.1 p.
I .J Aw"~ /
1760C
r
Council Minutes
April 16, 1985
The Council convened into the Work Session at 4:04 p.m., meeting in
the parking lot of the Municipal Building.
PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Alford,
Riddlesperger and Stephens
ABSENT: Mayer Stewart; Council Members Chew and McAdams
1. The Council conducted a tour to view various billboards and
signs in conjunction with the proposed sign ordinance.
The Council then convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m, in the
Civil Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members
h Alford, Chew, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENT: None
In conjunction with the tour to view billboards and signs, Council
Member Stephens stated that he felt the Council ought not act on the
proposed sign ordinance at the present time. The current session of
the state legislature was considering sign related issues and
perhaps the Council should delay action until the session was over.
Council Member Stephens further stated that wherever the Council did
take official action on the proposed ordinance, some members might
be opposed to the ordinance including existing non-conforming signs
at the time of passage of the ordinance.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that that would assume that the
only problem with the proposed ordinance was in regard to signs
which did not conform due to size.
Council Member Stephens stated that another problem would be
amortization.
Mayor Stewart stated that he believed the ordinance should be
approved before the end of the legislative session in Austin. The
Council could delete from the ordinance those issues about which
they were In doubt.
Council Members Stephens and Chew stated that they would rather wait.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the longer the ordinance
was delayed, more signs would be put up.
Mayor Stewart asked about the large signs on the interstate highway.
Hartung responded that the legal staff could give clarification on
where the city jurisdiction ended and the Highway Beautification Act
jurisdiction began.
Council Member McAdams stated that she wanted an end to the signs.
Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins stated that he felt the bill would pass the
state legislature; however, the city would then be responsible for
buying the signs.
Council Member McAdams statel that she wanted to see the proposed
ordinance passed and if the legislature acted, the city ordinance
would become invalid.
Charlie Watkins, sign ordinance consultant, stated that the city
ordinance would not be invalidated but some of the existing signs
would have to be relocated.
Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins stated that 2 out of S signs would have to be
moved. This would open the city up to an unimaginable number of
lawsuits.
i
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
I Page Two
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that those signs that did not
conform to the proposed ordinance did not conform to the existing
ordinance.
The consensus of the Council was to place the proposed sign
ordinance on the agenda for approval as quickly as possible after
the state legislature acted.
1. The Council considered the scheduling of the $10,000,000
` street bond project.
Rick Svehla, Assistant City Manager, distributed an updated schedule
for the Council's review. Svehla reported that this was the "first
cut" at the schedule of street projects and stowed where there were
conflicts with major utilities such as water and sewer project.
Lengthy discussions had been held with the water and sewer
departments; some projects were in the design chase at the present
time. The Capital improvements Program had $250,000 for water and
sewer replacecent activities. The suggestion from staff was to pull
out those projects in conflict with the street bond program so as
not to pave and then have to tear up the streets for the laying of
water or sewer lines. Staff would be bringing back to the Council a
schedule for the funding. Those streets which conflicted with the
CIP utility improvements could be reprogrammed to 1986 or 1987 for
paving, etc.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that this reprogramming would
not change the over-all timing of the street improvement project.
i
Sve'+'a reported that :here were no conflicts with water and sewer
projects in 1985 or 1986. The installation of major water lines was
scheduled for 1987; street repairs had been scheduled so as not to
conflict. Staff had also looked at the possibility of getting
developer participation. The locations of the street repairs had
been grouped together in order to get better bids. liming of the
relairs had been viewed witn an eye to spread the locations out
city-wide so as not to totally disrupt one section of town.
' Svehla further reported the,. the overlay and repaving would be done
first. If delayed, some repaving would would become rebuilding due
to deterioration. Some streets would have to be remixed before
being repaved due to heavy use.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked about Bonnie Brae due to the
petition which had been received.
Svehla responded that Bonnie Brae was in a major growth area. There
was a concrete plant in the area which used Bonnie Brae. A1s) there
were large water lines to be put in place on Bonnie Brae was well as
the new water plant. Time was needed to give the utilities an
opportunity to gear up. Bonnie Brae was currently scheduled for
1987-88. Also there was quite a lot of vacant land in this area and
the staff would like a chance at getting developer participation.
City Manager Hartung reported that staff was working with First
Southwest Company on selling the street bonds. First Southwest was
aware that the city wanted to move as quickly as possible on these
projects.
2. The Council held a discussion of proposed restructuring of
current out-of-city fee structure for the Library.
Joella Orr, Librarian, reported that the Library had waited until
two quarters of the fiscal year had passes' to gather adequate data.
During the 1983/44 fiscal year, out-of-city use represented
approximately 201 of the total circulation and the County had
reimbursed 101 of this cost. To date this fiscal year, the out-of-
city circulation was approximately 161 which represented a cost of
t $47,410 of which only $6,809 was recovered through the sale of
f
r
City of Denton city council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1983
Page Three
library cards at $11 each. %hile this recovered revenue was
helpful, it did not cover the cost of service. The staff was
looking at several options which included:
1. to continue providing the service with the taxpayers
of Denton suosidizing out-of-city use
2. to discontinue the service to out-of-city patrons
3. to obtain funding from the County to recover the .ost
of out-of-city patron use
4. to increase the fees to recover the costs
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the increased fees would not
discourage use of the library.
Orr responded that the City of Dallas library had increased their
fees and usage had declined. It seemed that the County was ready to
rethink the funding issue. The cost would be $1.50 per capita and
the County would retaburse a portion of this for the actual use of
the library.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that perhaps now was an
appropriate time to approach the Commissioners Court on this issue.
Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager, reported that the Library
budget was being prepared and costs had gone up. It was believed
tha' the City should approach the County and present these
alternatives.
Mayor Pro Tea Hopkins stated that perhaps this should be delayed iue
to other problems between the City and the County.
City Manager Hartung reported that now would be the time as the
Commissioners Court was working on their budget.
5. The Council reviewed and considered approval of proposed
changes to the 1985 Citizen Survey.
Betty McKean, Assistant City Manager, reported that the staff had
made soze minor changes in the 1984 citizen survey grestionnaire for
1985. Items 14 and 15 from the 1984 survey had been deleted as they
dealt with street issues and the bond election had taken care of
this. Oi. the 1985 survey, items 18.A and 110.A had been reworded
while item 010.C was a new question relating to the crime prevention
program. Item 115.A ("Does the fact that you seldom or never see a
police patrol in your neighborhood concern you a lot, a little, or
not at all?") was a new question relating to public safety.
Council Member Stephens stated he felt this question could be
misconstrued and should be deleted.
Council Member Riadlesperger stated that the survey was only for
approximately 40D people and felt the Council should know how many
people were concerned about this issue.
McKean reported that the purpose of the survey was to get an idea of
how citizens felt about the community.
Council Members McAdams, Alford, Riddlesperger and Mayor Stewart
felt the question should be left on the survey. Council Members
Stephens and Chew felt it should be deleted.
McKean further reported that new items 116 (regarding if the
respondent felt improvement was needed in city services and if so,
how much), 117 (which services the respondent would be in favor of
reducing), 118 (regarding the quality of service provided by Animal
Control} and 121 (regarding which city departments the respondent
had contacted about a complaint, request for service or i:format'on)
had been added.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 15, 1985
Page Four
Council Member Stephens stated that item 118 said nothing about dogs
and asked if the item could be worded to say something about the
leash laws.
McKean further reported that item 121 hac three questions. The City
Attorney's Office and Court Clerks were not included In the list of
possible contact departments. Items 125 and 126 were new questions
or, attitudes regarding traffic. Item 127 asked if enough was being
' done to attract new industry in Denton. Item 128 asked if the
respondent was aware that the city offered a free energy audit and
129 asked if the respondent would be in favor of on additional tax
to support Flow Hospital,
Council Member McAdams asked on item 119 ("Generally, how effective
in zoning in Denton?"} if people really understood the meaning of
effective zoning.
4, The Council discussed an ordinance prohibiting storage o
cars on residential lawns.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the Council was being asked
to respond to the memorandum from the City Attorney on this issue.
1 Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, reported that the Dallas ordinance
r was lenient. The intent of the Dallas ordinance was to clean up
yards prior to the Republ?can National Convention. The Denton
ordinance had been rejected by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
F Council Member Riddlesperger stated that junk cars were already
~fohibited by city ordinance but they were still chore. The
ordinance was ineffective because a citizen cuuld move thq car I
inch and not be in violation.
Drayovitch responded that the Texas legislature was very protective
of citizen's rights to personal property. People could insure that
a vehicle had current license tags and a valid inspection sticker
and the vehicle would be legal.
to have the
Council the Ccil
Mayor staff try w to t prepare an ordinanceh for wish of
discussion,
The consensus of the Council was to direct staff to prepare an
ordinance for discussion.
Drayovitch stated :hat the proposed ordinance would have to be
reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to coming
before the Council,
5, Due to lack of time, the Council did not convened into thy,
Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real estate, personnel
and board appointments,
The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:64 p.m. in
the Council Chambers,
PRESENT; :dayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members
Alford, Chew, McAdams, Riddlesperger and Stephens
City Manager, City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENT: None
1. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of April 2, 198S and the Special Called Meeting of
April 9, 1985.
Riddlesperger motion, McAdams second to approve the Minutes as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
K Page Five
` 2. Consent Agenda
I propkins motion. McAdams second to a the Consent Agenda as
A. Bids and Purchase orders:
1. Bid 1 9324 - Vacuum pump
2. Bid 1 9367 - Pickups and trucks
I'. 3. Bid 1 9386 - Vibratory rollers
4. Bid # 9424 - 8" w~.ter Line
h S. Bid 19427 Hand eld electronic meta[ rezdinR
device
6. Bid 1 9433 - Parkway Plaza - W6S participation
7. Bid # 9436 - Chip spreader aid asphalt paver
8. Bid # 9440 - Playground equipment
9. Bia # 9405 Raw water pump installation
10. Bid # 9435 - 2.0 MG ground storage tank
I 11. Purchase Order # 67248 to Floyd Glenn Smith in
the amount of $3,341.00
I
I 12. Purchase Order f 67420 to Butler and Land i,t the
amount of $3,776.00
67409 Gifford-}sill American
13, Purchase Ord of t ;4, 00
In the am-unt of $4,758.0D
14. Purchase Order # 47572 to Motorola Communications
in the amount of ;6,948.00
15. Purchase Order # 67579 to A. P. Green in the
azount of $8,000.0D
16. Purchase Order 0 67719 to Vermeer Equipment in
the amount of $3,083.54
B. Plats and Replats:
1. Approval of preliminary plat cf the Bell
Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends app
2. Approval of final replat of the A. E. Bell
Commissiontk recommends
Planning ands Z6 , 7 oning and 8
approval.)
3. Approval of preltminar~ replat of the JBC
Addition, Lot 3A, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary plat of the Lifee
Tabernacle CndrehZ ddition,Comm issionlocrecommends
and
Planning
approval.)
5. Approval of preliminary plat of the Naughton
Place Addition, Lot 1, block 1. (The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
Dage Six
6. Approval of -)reliminary replat of the Redman
Addition, Lot 1B, Block 2. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
7. Approval of preliminary plat of the Cedar Creek
Addition, Lots 1.16, Block 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
C. Change order:
1. Consider approval of Change order 11 for
water/sewer line relocation on Loop 188 to
Calvert Paving Company - Bid 0 9364
3. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
' Charles Watkins requesting a change in zoning from the agricultural
f (A) classification to the light industrial (LI) district on a .462
1 acre tract located at the northwest corner of U.S. Highway 380 and
If Cooper Creek Road. If the zoning change is approved, the property
may be utilized for any land uae permitted in the light industrial
(LI) district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance. Z-1729
The Mayor opencJ the public hearing,
Charlie Watkins, representing Alan Thetford the owner of the
property, spoke in favor stating that the property was locate6 on
Highway 380 and Cooper Creek ;'oa This site was the location of an
existing facility which was non-conform use. The petitioner was
requesting Light Industrial zoning as a manufacturing function was
presently being performed at the site. The owner would like to
expand as he currently must store materials at a rented facility.
Mr. Thetford was requesting the parcel be rezoned so that he could
expand the existing structure to include room for storage. Three to
five people were currently employed and no more were expected.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reported that this was a small tract
of less than 1/2 acre which was a legal non-conforming use. Light
Industrial zoning would be consistent with surrounding land uses.
Seven reply forms had been mailed with one returned in favor. The
Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval by a vote of
6 to 0.
1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning on a .452 acre tract located at the
northwest corner of U.S. Highway 380 and Cooper Creek Road.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. OS-79
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO.
69-1, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0.462 ACRES
OF LAND SITUATED IN THE M.E.P. 6 P.R.R. CO. SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 1469, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF U. S. HIGHWAY 380 AND COOPER CREEK
ROAD; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND
USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFI-
CATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL "L1" CLASSIFICATION AND
USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
R
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
Page Seven
i
r. Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll cal
"
vote, McAdams "ayE Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alfoi~rd "aye,
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart aye. Motion
carried unanimously.
L 4. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts
for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services;
providing for the expenditure of funds therefore; and prov:ding for
an effective date.
The following ordinance was presented:
N0. as-80
I~
AN ORDING ITIVS BIDS AND CONTRACTNFOR THECPURCHASECOf RAT£RIALS, EQU VONT,VSUPPLIES
OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
` Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
materials, for the of funds ineaccordancercwith sthe
1 of provisions competitive bids; and providing for c an purchases effective date, requirements
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 8S-81
F AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE lXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR
EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, E`UIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR
SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE QQFROVIPIONS OF STATE LAW
EXEMPT AND SUCH PROVIDING URCHASES ROM R I V E IDAEMENTS OF COMPETITIVE
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye,' Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Ste-gart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
r C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
I accepting competitive bids and providing ~oggr the award of contracts
for an effect3 veodatee expenditure of
for s therefore; works and providing improvoments; pr
fund
The following ordinance was presented:
1 NO. 8S-82
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR
THE AWARD OF FOR OR 14PROM:
PROVIDING FUR COTHE CEXPENDITURELIOF WOFU D.eQ THEREFtR:ENAND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
1
Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
` Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
setting a date, time and place for public hearings regarding the
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
Page Eight
petition of Hammett 5 Nash, Inc. for annexation of approximately
361.708 acres situated in the H. May Survey, Abstract 807 and the
V. E. Galo Survey, approximately Abstrac 452, and
northiofiHer Hercules. o{ A-16216;
(North Locust) apppp
Marion Copeland, Administrative Intern, reported that the
petitioners were oe ia8 avoluntary he dats for annexaticn.
public hearings.
May 14 and MY 28 as
NO. 85-83
AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS
DESCRIBED HEREIN BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF
` SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS.
1,
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll ca
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
1 setting a date, time and place for public hearings regarding the
f petition of Hammett 5 Nash, Inc. for annexation vi approximately
` 180.9855 acres situated in the John A. Burns Survey, Abstract 130,
9,00 feet north begini,ift west of FM
r and :h~~ :as Polk Survey
roximately Abstract
Hercules.
' 2160 tNorthth Locust) app
A-19
I The following ordinance was presented:
i NO. 85.84
r
` AN ORDINANCE SETTING A DATE, TIMC AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC
` HEARINGS ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AS
DESCRIBED HEREIN BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND
t AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF
IL SUCH PUBLIC HEARINGS.
Chew motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesptrger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
repealing Section 25-6.1 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas; reenacting a now Section 25-6i1 to provide for the
average billing of utility services; and provding for an effective
date.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the Public
billing would
the average ordinance
lia technical had dreviewed ju tment this Item. This
program.
for
Projected costs for the upcoming year has caused utilitiy bills to
be larger than they should have been. This adjustment wLuld allow
those persons on the average billing system t~ have bills which were
closer to the actual cost. The ordinance wojid also allow customers
who good were
c edit history, to be placed bills the average billing lsy tem. of
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-a5
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 25.6.1 OF THE CODE OF
PROVIDE DENTON, TEXAS;
FOR THE AVERAGE REENACTING A
ORDINANCES H TO CITY OF
BILLING N
SECTION ZS OF
UTILITY SERVICES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
10
City of Denton City council minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
Page Nine
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddiesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a proposed oversize agreement with Ridgeway Plaza Joint
Venture for a new water line of Lillian B. Miller Parkway along the
frontage of the property.
Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that this was merely a
name change on the contract as a new party had purchased the
property.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-86
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE CITY'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF INSTALLING OVERSIZE WATERLINE
FACILITIES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT;
APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
S. Resolutions
A. The Council considered app: oval of a resolution
closing Congress Street between :,lice and Denton streets from 3:00
p m. to 7:00 pp.m. on Friday, May 10, 1985 for the annual Day of the
Cougar fundraising event sponsored by the Calhoun Junior High School
PTA.
Ms. Candy Hickerson, Vice-President of the Calhoun Junior High
School P-TA, stated that the street had been closed fot this event
in 19e4. Mr. Olyai, Traffic Engineer, had felt it best that the
P-TA come before the Council to request the closing. The Day of the
Cougar fundraiser involved the entire school and the closing of the
street would alleviate any potential safety problem for parents and
children who would have to cross the street many times during the
day.
Tne following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, on Friday, May 10, 1985, Calhoun Jr. Hi,h PT;, is
sponsoring an annual Day of the Cougar fundraising event, to be i.sld
on Congress Street between the intersection of Alice Street knd
Denton Street; and
WHEREAS all abutting property owners of the street have
given th.•tr permission to the temporary closing of said street; and
WHEREAS the Day of the Cougar fundraising Event is open to
the general public of the City and County of Denton; and
WHEREAS, to order to provide adequate space for the said
fundraising event and in order to protect the safety of citizens who
attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is necessary
to temporarily close a portion of Congress Street between Alice
Street and Denton Street from the hours of 3:00 P.M. total 7:00 P.M.
on May 10, 1985;
1
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
Page Ten
NOW, THERTFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CuUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SE0ION I.
That Congress Street between Alice Street and Denton Street
shall be temporarily closed as a street or public thoroughfare of
any kind or character whatever on May 10, 1985 from 3:00 P.M. until
7:00 P.M. for the purpose of holding the Day of the Cougar
funlralsing event.
SECTION 11.
That the portion of the above described streets shall
revert back to the City for normal traffic activity Immediately from
` and after 7:00 P.M. on May 10, 1985.
SECTION 111.
` Tnst this resolution shall take effect and be In full force
and effect from and after the date of its passage And approval.
1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of April, 1985.
f CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLUTTE ALLEN, CITY SECREUR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
McAdams motion, Hopkins second that the resollition be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams aye, Hopkins aye, Stephens aye, Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," anJ Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered approval of a resolution
approving an agreement by the City of Denton Industrial Development
of such bond her and the bond
resolution providing for the issuance Glenn L.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the Denton Industrial
for Development
pro~ec t Authority which dwoumet ld andapproved vnewt companiesartodocuments to
Denton. The Authority was now asking for Council approval of 3 bond
resolution to provide for %he issuance of the bond.
Mr. Byron Hart, representing the petitioner, stated that Mr. Hulcher
would be moving his 3 corporations to Denton from Illinois. The
first company was a national leasing and financial corporation, as
well as Hulcher Emergency Services and EV Systems which dealt with
computer software. The company was very excited about coming to
Texas and would bring 22 families fro: Illinois. Approximately 15
new fobs in the $10,000 to $40,o00 per year salary range would be
generated with the possibility of 25 more jobs over the next 3 to 5
years.
The following resolution :as presented:
City of Denton City Council Minutes
:Meeting of April 16, 1985
Page Eleven
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AiREEMENT BY
CITY OF DENTO,N INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
TO ISSUE A BOND FOR
GLENN L. HULCHER
AND THE BOND RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR
THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BOND
WHEREAS, City of Denton Industrial Development Authority
wss created under the auspices of the City of Denton, Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton (the
"City") has, by written resolution declared that certain areas of
the City be designated as blighted areas (the "Blighted Areas")
pursuant to the Develo~prmuent Corporation Act of 1979, as amended,
Article 519U.6, V.A.T.C.S., and the rules promulgated thereunder
(the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, Glenn L. Hulcher desires to finance, pursuant to
the Act, the construction of an office building containing
approximately 14,500 s ware feet located at 611 Wimberly Drive in
Denton, TeXA.s (the "Pro~ect"); and
WHEREAS, the Project is located within or adjacent to the
Blighted Area; and
WHEREAS, the general public had an opportunity to make
comments on the Project prior tc the adoption of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable that this
Resolution be adopted.
THEREFORE, BE 11 RESOLVFD BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTUN THAT:
Section 1. The "Loan Agreement between City of Denton
Industrial Development Authority and Glenn L. Hulcher", in
substantially the form and substance as attached to this Resolution
and made a part hereof for all purposes, is hereby approved, and the
Bond in the principal amount of $1,550,000, may be issued pursuant
thereto for the purpose of paying the test of acquiring and
constructing or causing to be acquired and constructed the Project
as defined and described herein.
Section 2. Thy "Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of
City of Denton Industrial Development Authority Bond, Series 1985
and the Execution of Trust Indenture (Glenn L. Hulcher Project)", in
substantially the form and substance attached to this Rosolution and
made a part hereof for all purposes, is hereby specifically
approveu, and the Bond may be issued as provided for therein.
Section 3. The City hereby approves the issuance of the
aforesaid Bond In the aggregate principal smog-it of S1,3SO,000 for
Glenn L. Hulcher, and further approves the Project as described in
the aforesaid Loan Agreement, and such approvals shall be solely for
the purposes of Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
as amended, and the City shall Lave no liabilities for the payment
of the F.ond nor shall any of its assets be pledged to the payment of
the Bor 1,
Section 4. The City hereby assigns to the City of Denton
Indust^ial Development Authority its allocable portion of the state
private activity bond volume with respect to the reservation request
to be filed for the bond by the City of Denton Industrin' Develop-
ment Authority.
McAdams motion, Alford second that the resolution be approved. On
roil call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
l City of Denton City council minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
Page Twelve
C. The Council considered approval of a resolution
' expressing the City of Denton's intent to enter into a water salea
agreement with Argyle Water Supply Corporation.
r Bok, Nelson, Director of Utilities, reported that the Argyle Water
Supply Corporation served a large area in Argyle and in Denton's
extra-territorial jurisdiction in the area south of Denton. Ms, Jo
Storer was developing property on Brush Creek Road and was planning
on installing a t0" to 12" water line dawn Brush Creek. To serve
future developments in this area, a 16" water line would be
appropriate. The City would participate with this water line from
` Hobson Lane to the railroad tracks on Fort Worth Drive. Before
Argyle would commit the funds, they had requested assurance from
Denton that the city would sell water to them. Denton currently did
sell water to Corinth and served the extra -territorial jurisdiction
areas. Corinth had asked for a resolution as assurance and had
expressed the intention that Denton would take the customers when
the property was annexed and would, at that time, take over the
system. The system would have to collect Sol of the water and
return it to the Dentor, system. The final contract would be
presented at a later date.
Council Member Hopkins asked wh•1 Argyle was not willing to pay more
than for just oversizing when this appeared to be a major water
system. He then asked if the water would not have to go back into a
major collection system such as ours.
Nelson responded yes,
Council Member Hopkins then stated that most of the homes in Argyle
were on septic systems for sewerage. It seemed to him that the city
should require the lines to be run now to bring the water back into
1 the Denton system.
Nelson replied that the resolution before the Council specified that
L the system would conform to the Denton standards. Ore of ttese
` requirements was that at least S0% of the customers be on the
collection system.
Council Mexaber Hopkins stated that the staff needed to watch this
situation very carefully from a fiscal standpoint.
Nelson reported that one problem was that the Argyle Water Supply
Cor ration was chartered only as a water supplier. Th►y were
funding a large portion of the water IIhe as an incentive to
developers to install appropriate sewer lines.
The following resolution was presented;
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the Argyle Water Supply Corporation (AWSC)
provides water service to the City of Argyle and surrounding areas
including certain areas in the City of Denton's extraterritorial
jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, AWSC has worked cooperatively with 0e City of
Denton to install lines in Denton's extraterritorial jurisdiction in
accordance with Denton's standards in anticipation of Denton
eventually acquiring such facilities upon annexation of such
extraterritorial jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, AWSC obtains their water supply from wells and
recognizes the long-term necessity to obtain a !urface water supply;
WHEREAS, AWSC has agreed to participate in oversizing a
waterline for approximately 11,000' along highway 377 from the Santa
Fe Railroad south past brush Creek Road, all in conjunction with the
Jo Storer Homes, inc., development; and
I
~.y J
.
r City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
l Page Thirteen
a WHEREAS, AWSC has requested assurance of Denton's intent to
sell treated water to AWSC upon completion of s:ch line and upon
meeting other certain criteria as outlined in Exhibit I attached
F herewith; and
WHEREAS, AWSC's intent is to transfer ownership at no cost
to the City of any AWSC lines located in Denton's extraterritorial
jurisdiction at the time Denton annexes such area(s) provided AWSC's
oop line system integrity is maintained;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
' The City of Denton hereby expresses Denton's intent to
enter into a contract with the Argyle Water Supply Corporation
(AWSC) to sell treated water upon completion of an appropriate
waterline to the AWSC certificated area, such line to be extended by
development interests or AWSC, and upon AWSC's meeting certain
i~ service criteria as outlined In Exhibit I attached hereto and/or the
Dallas Water Utilities New Customer Service Policy Terms of such
contract shall follow the principles outlined in Exhibit I.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of April, 1985.
FTCT1MM-(T.-STFWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAM1 DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second that the resolution be
approved. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens
"aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "Aye," and Mayor
Stewart "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
D. The Council considered approval of a resolution
postponing the regular meeting of the City of Denton City Council
from May 7, 1985 to May 14, 1985.
The follow'.g resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, a majority of the Council will be out of the Cityy11
necessary May that 11985; NOW,
mee ig Denton on
sucyh 7date 98be and it
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I1.
That the regular Council meeting to be held on May 7, 1985
be postponed until May 140 1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 16th day of April, 1985.
RICHARD U. STEWART$ MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 16, 1985
Page Fourteen
ATTEST:
L'fflatL'a7"I'E'7C , , LILT btl~ 17K"
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DWOYITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, 'TEXAS
B Y:
Chew motion, McAdams second that the resolution be approved. On
roll cAll vote, McAdam "aye," Hopkins "eye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Rildlesperger aye, Chew aye, and Mayor Stewart aye.
Motion carried unanimously.
6. There was no official action on Executive Session items of
legal matters, real estate, personne' abd board appointments.
7, New Business
The following items of new business were suggested by
Council Mtmyers for future agendas:
1. Council Member Hopkins requested a report on sales tax.
City Manager Chris Hartung responded that the Council would
be receiving a financial report,
2. Council Member Hopkins requested a street light study (the
Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission review the
traffic lights). gg
was y being alone breported uadntsthat . the
study was Svehla, process Assistant
3. M agenda toe consider charter arevisionsbandp/oar amendments, next
4. Council Member McAdams requested a resolution be placed on
the next agenda for Project Texas and also a future work
session item regarding the North Texas food bank.
5. Council Member Stephens requested a resolution for
discussion regarding the changing of election day from the
first Saturday in April to the second Saturday if the First
Sunday in April was Easter,
The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss legal
matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. No official
action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
RICHARD 0. STrWWr1-VM
C MEN, 1T Y --S R F
1744C
k
F
Council Minutes
i April 13, 1985
r
,
The Council convene) into the Special Call-)d Meeting at 5;00 P.m.
meeting in the Council Chambers.
Council Members
PRESENT: Alford, Chew, ; Rddlesperger e and oStephens
ABSENT; Council Member McAdams was out of town attending a
( seminar
Ordinances
A. Tne Council considered adoption of an ordinance
instituting annexation proceedings ona tract consisting of
approximately 136.58 acres beginning approximately S00 feet east the centerline of U. S. Highway 377 and south of Brush Creek Road.
A-11
Council Member Stephens stated that it had been discussed if this
particular annexation could be voluntary so as not to count against
the City and asked if there was any report.
R David llison, Senior Planner, reported that voluntary annexation
this particular annexation had not changed.
4 The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 85-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 136.51
t ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
Ir DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE GEORGE DAUGHERTY SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 351, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS,
CLASSIFYING THE SAKE AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On. roll
call vote, Hopkins "aye," S~ephens aye, Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "ayes" Chew "aye." and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
B. The Ccuncil considered adoption of an ordinance
instituting annexation proceedings on a tract consisting of
approximately 65.12 acres beginning 3SO feet south of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U. S. Highway 380 and east of
Geesling Road (Capricorn Mobile Home Park and surrounding
property.) A-13
The following ordinance was presented:
N0. 8S-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACI'E0XFF LAND CONTIGUOUS
ALLGUTHAT OU LAND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, T
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 93.67
FO REST
ACRES DENTON ~FST ALAND TE OF LYING TEXAS RAND BEING BEING SITUATED OFN THE E 4. COUNTY OF
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY, AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, Hopkins "eye," Stephens aye, Alford "aye," Riddlesparger
"aye It Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
instituting annexation proceedings on a tract consisting of
approximately 34.60 acres of land situated in the M. Forrest Sufvey
Abstract No. 417, and beginning approximately 2SO feet southth 2ani
,perpendicular to the centerline of FM 416 and approximately
feet bast of Mayhill Road. A-14
I
10
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 23, 1985
Page Two
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 8S-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BEING ALL THAT LOT
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING O~ APPROXIMATELY 34.66
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE M. FORREST
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 417, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SANE AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. Or roll call
vote, Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesperger
"aye " Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion carried
unanimously.
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
instituting Annexation proceedings on a tract consisting of
approximately 42.35 acres of land situated in the S. Huirar Survey,
Abstract No, 514, and beginning approximately S00 feet north of and
perpendicular to the centerline of U. S. Highway 380 and west of
Masch Branch Road. A-15
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 8S-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJAC TO TH
TY OF TRACTEOR PARCEE CI OF LAND DCONS19TING 0i ABEING ALL T PPROXIMATELY 42.31
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN TVF COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THB S. HUIZAR
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 514, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye," Riddlesp,)rger
"aye," Chew "ayeand Mayor Stewart "aye," Motion carried
unanimously,
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
Instituting annexation proceedings on a tract consisting of
approximately ISO acres of land located west of Hayhill Road
approximately 4,000 feet north of I-3S and adjacent and north of the
MK4T Railroad. A-17
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. BS-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 1S0
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE D. HOUGH
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 6460 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; CLASSIFYING
THE SANE AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Rlddlesperger motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously,
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
instituting annexation proceedings on a tract consisting of
approximately 60.38 acres situated in the G. Walker Survey, Abstract
No. 1330, and beginning adjacent and cast of Edwards Road. A-18
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 23, 1985
Page Three
The following ordinance was presented;
NO, 85-
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS AND
ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF DENTON TEXAS; BEING ALL THAT LOT,
TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 60.38
ACRES OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DENTON, STATE OF TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE G. WALXER
SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1330, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS;
CLASSIFYING THE SAME AS AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT PROPERTY;
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "ayc,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
r carried unanimously.
2. Resolutions
A. The Council considered approval of a resolution
appointing an official Voting Representative of the City of Dentoa
to the North Central Texas Council of Governments General Assembly
for 1985-86.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to approve the resolution and
am int Jim Riddlesperger as official Voting Representative to
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T 1 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
SECTION I.
That Jim Riddlesperger is hereby appointed as the official
Voting Representative of the City of Denton to the North Central
Texas Council of Governments General Assembly for 1985.1986.
SECTION 11.
This Resolution shall become effective from and after its
date of passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 23rd day of April, 1985.
RICHARD ,TEAT MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON,TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, i:XAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM,
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCK, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: _
On roll call vote, Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 13, 1985
Page Four
B. Tne Council considered approval of a resolution to
issue bonds by North Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc.;
approving the issuance of one or more series of bonds; and making
certain findings ►n connection therewith.
Mr. Ralph Rushing, representing the North Texas Higher Education
Authority, Inc., reported that he had appeared before the Council 6
to 6 weeks previously requesting authorization to refund the NTHEA
1981 bonds. The Authority had been working to put the reftindiug
together and hoped to be in the market place during the next week.
In the course of working on the refunding, the Higher Education
Servicing Corporation reported that commitment for funds available
had exhausted those funds. Mr. Bernard would report and request for
authorization to proceed with the issuance of more bonds.
Mr. Mike Bernard, Executive Director of the North Texas Higher
' Education Authority, stated that the Higher Education Servicing
Corporation dealt with lenders. The corporation was conducting a
survey of lenders and had received responses back from all but
approximately 6. The corporation was looking at approximately
$35,000,000 needed capital over the next 3 years for the Dallas-Fort
Worth area.
Council Member Stephens asked about the prospects as far as
Washington was concerned.
Mr. Bernard responded that he did not feel the program would be cut
out.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if the Authority received block
grant funds.
Mr. Bernard answerers that thr banks loaned the money and the
Authority was self-sustaining through the proceeds of the bonds.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if there was any cost to the
federal government.
Y
Bernard responded not for the servicing corporation. The federal
government did pay the interest on the student loans; however, the
cost to the federal government was less than to a bank.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if Mr. Bernard anticipated that
the higher tuitiai. would affect the authority.
Mr. Bernard replied he felt there would be mcre demand.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if foreign students were eligible
for the loans.
Mr. Bernard responded that most foreign students were in the United
States on a student visa anO one of the requirements for the loan
was that the applicant must be a permanent resident.
The following resolution was presented:
A RESOLUTION by the City Council of the City of
Denton, Texas, relating to the issuance of Bonds by
the North Texas Higher Education Authority Inc.;
approving the issuance of one or more series of Bonds;
and making certain findings in connection therewith.
WHEREAS, this governing body requested certain individuals
' to proceed to re-organize and re-establish a non-profit corporation
pursuant to the Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act, for the purpose of
Furthering educational opportunities of students by providing funds
for the acquisition of student loans; that such has been accom-
plisned, the corporation being known as the "North Texas Higher
Education Authority, Inc." (the "Authority"); and
II
r
r'
City of Denton My Council Minutes
Meeting of Apr:, 23, 19a.S
Page Five
NHEREAS, the Authority has proceeded in the developatent of
a plan of doing business and has Issued bonds for the aforesaid
purposes, but additional funds are needed to continue the program
and it is now appropriate for this governing body to approve the
( issuance of additional bonds for such purpose; now, therefore,
1 TEXAS: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
SECTION is This governing body has been advised by the
Authortty that such Corporation, upon approval thereof by the
proposesg to oissue rethe bonds inforder toto provide Arlington, for xthe
acquisition of student loans; that such bonds would be initially
issued as one or more series of Bonds (collectively, the "Bonds"in
th41 aggregate principal amount of up to $50,000,000, and that such
Bonds would be payable from and secured by a pledge of revenues
derived from or by reason of the owiership of student loan notes and
investment income after deduction of such expenses for operating the
loan program as may be specified by the bond resolution or trust
indenture autnor:ting or securing such Bonds and the payment thereof.
t
The Bonds (up to the aggregate pprincipal amount of 0,0 Student Loan Notesiwhich are guaranteednunderitthewprovisions ~of hthe
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, to establish certain
reserves and for the purpose of paying certain expenses,
SECTION 11: This governing body hereby approves the
issuance and delivery of such Bonds for the purposes aforesaid, and
in this connection requests that the said Authority exercise the
p
Education owers enumerated and prcoided in Section 53.47 of the Texas
connection Code; exercise th t such non-profit corporation shall, in this
the State of Texas, as con eomplated by aSection behalf
of the
thCi and
etTexas
Education Code.
SECTION III: The City does not agree to assume any
responsibility in connection with the administration of this student
loan program; it being understood this responsibility is being
assumed by the Authority,
1 SECTION IV: It is recognized by this
f governing instruments which authorize the issuance of Bonds body that
Authority will specifically state that this City is not obligated to
r gay the principal of or interest on the Bonds proposed to be issued
y the Authority, Nothing in this resolution shall be construed as
an indicaticr: by this City that it will pay or provide for the
payment of any obligations of the said Authority whether heretofore
or hereafter incurred and in this connection, attention is called
incure nonsindebtednes Texas witho ter having is provided a for t' its
payment, and this City Council hereby specifically refuses to set
aside any present or future funds, assets or money for the payment
of any indebtedness or obligation of the Authority,
k SECTION V: That the Mayor is authorized and directed to
assist the Authority in the preparation and execution of a request
for an allocation of the state "cap" under Section 103(n) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the assignment to the
Authority of any allocation made or to be made to this City in the
1 calendar year 198S (with respect to such Bonds) is hereby made and
approved.
aft r 1teSECTION VI: This Resolution shall be effective from and
passage and approval.
r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of April 23, 1985
I Page Six
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 23rd day of April, 198S.
aynr, Lity o en on, exa
ATTEST:
tZT y-Fecietary, city of Denton, Texai
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
' BY:
I
Riddlesperger motion, Hopkins second that the resolution be
approved. On roll call vote, Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unalimousiy.
Mayor Stewart asked at what point did Mr. 'tushing feel the situation
would stabilize.
Mr. Rushing responded that the hope was to have a revolving fund and
to be able to recycle payments into new loans rather than to borrow.
f 3. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
' 4. The following items of New Business were suggested by
Council Members for future agendas:
1. Council Member Hopkins requested a report on investments.
2. Mayor Stewart requested a discussion or consideration of
L the Sister Cities Program.
r With no further items of business, the meetirg was adjourned.
RICRARD . s ,
o HERrrM
Ii
1761C
DATES May Itl, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
6;Z
TO: Mayor and Members of the City C-)uncil
FROMI G. Chrie Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SOLID WASTE CONTRACT
RECOMMENI)ATIONr of the • CitysoffDenton anddNorthpTexas State University forrSolid wathesteagCollreement the
Disposal Services.
SUMMARY:
The contract contains an initial term from June 1, 1985, to August 31, 1985, and may
be extended for three additional one year to nns. The contract price will amount to
$132,444 for one year's service and will increase divisional revenues by $11,044 per
month, The contract price as bid by the City of Denton was designed to recover total
costs plus a 10% return on investment.
in order for the City to provide such service, it will be necessary to add one
additional commercial driver position to the Commercial Division and purchase a new
front-loading container truck. We do not feel that the workload or service required
by North Texas State University will fully utilize the new crew or %ehicle on a
full-time basist thus, this venture will allow us to expand our service level by
offering an alternative service method not currently available in the community.
There is some degzee of risk in this endeavor as North Texas State University has the
option of not extending this contracts however, we are confident that the potential
benefits are worth the possible risks.
BACKGROUND:
Some months ago, North Texas State University decide:l that it would like to eliminate
its solid waste collection system and contract such services out. In January, we
submitted a bid to North Texas State Vniversity to provide such service as we saw
this additional business as a substantial benefit to our operations. For some time,
we have desired to convert our side-loading container system to the more efficient
and cost effective front-loading system, but have not been able to generate the
resources to make such a conversion feasible. The. North Texas State University
service will allow us to offer a new service to our customers while allowing us to
begin a slow conversion to the better system.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT'S: OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
' Commercial Collections Division
r
i
i
i
L
,
C
i NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SOLID WASTE CONTRACT
t Page 2
FISCAL IMPACTo
The impact of this contract will be directed at the Sanitation Fund in terms of both
cost and revenues. The annual cost of this service is estimated at $119,200 and the
annual revenues are estimated at $132,444, resulting Li a profit of $130244.
Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manage
' Prepared byi
Bill Angelo
Assistant Director of Public works
Approved by:
1
` Bill Angelo
Assistant Director of Public Works
r sw7
f
k
r
R E S 0 L U T 10 11
dHEREAS, the City of Denton owns a solid waste disposal
se-lice; and
WHEREAS, North Texas State University and the City of Denton
are desirous of entering into an agreement for solid waste
disposal service; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, THAT:
SECTION I.
The agreement for solid waste disposal service between the
City of Denton and North Texas State University, attached hereto
and incorprirated herein by reference, is hereby .pprovcd.
SECTION 11.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to expcute the attached
agreement on behalf of the City.
' SECTION :I1.
This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985•
v
CITYDENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
I
I
I
I
i
1r
f
' 1082L
(1 '
!1
r ~
( THE STATE OF TEXAS §
{ AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON
r f COUNTY OF DENTON § AND NORTH TEXAS STATE CNIVERSITY
i
WHEREAS, North Texas State University (hereinafter referred to
` as "NTSU") has advertised for bids for solid waste disposal
service and the City of Denton (hereinafter referred to as "City")
having submitted a bid for such services; and
i
1 WHEREAS, NTSU having accepted such bid and the parties are
I desivaus of entering into an agreement for solid waste disposal
service; NOW, THEREFORE,
WITNESSETH:
' k I. SCOPE
r ! City shall provide NTSU with solid waste disposal services in
accordance with the condition.' end provisions outlined in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if the same
` were set forth in its entirety herein.
I II. PAYMENT
NTSU agrees to pay City in accordance with the rates AS set
{ forth in said Exhibit A.
III. CANCELLATION
This contract may be cancelled by eirher party for just cause
by giving written notice to the other party no less than sixty
i
(60) days. It is understood by and between the parties teat the
foregoing provisi%n shall and does supercede the cancellation
provision contained is Exhibit A.
IV. SERVICES
A. Both parties agree that this agreement is subject to the
provisions of Chapter 325, Subchapter B of the Regulations
{ promulgated by the Texas Department of Health, as the same exist
now and as may be amended from time to time hereafter.
B. Both parties agree that the section ,ddressing "Required
{ Service" is hereby qualified by the following paragraphs:
r
` PAGE 1
10
R
r
r.
Authorized waste stored in conformance with applicable
` state and local regulations within a ten-foot radius
I`r of a regularly serviced container, will be removed by
the City, provided the number of times such overage is
placed for disposal within said radius does not exceed
twenty percent (20x) of the total number of services
provided to that collection point during any calendar
month. If such placement exceeds twenty percent
(201), the City will notLfy NTSU of the need for
increased container capacity or service frequency at
said collection point, and the parties agree that the
I City shall amend the collection schedule and monthly
fees accordingly. NTSU may refuse such adjustment
when initially notified by City, but shall not
thereafter require City to collect waste not deposited
in dumpsters at the collection point in question.
f Should dumpsters be overloaded so as to make them
unserviceable, additional charges may be made to NTSU
for costs incurred by the City in its efforts to
f restore the serviceability of the containers in
question. For example, the removal and disposal of
large quantities of construction material (e.g., rock,
iron, concrete, soil) and/or wetted garbage may
require the application of additional equipment and
personnel, the cost of which shall be billed to NTSU.
C. This agreement does not encompass the collection or disposal
of special wastes or hazardous wastes.
IV. TEM
The initial term of this agreement ahall commence June 1, 1985
and continue through August 31, 1985. Thereafter, NTSU shall have
the option to extend the contract for three (3) additional one-year
terms.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
ATTEST:
CKARLOTTE'ALLEN* CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK:
f DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON) TEXAS
BY: tIC~fLiI ~I/~ /t i I '~7, r~ rll1l
PACE 2
F r
MMTATION TO 610
SMTO ~ --MORT1 TEXAS STATE 1K1V(1S11%1DOCMMU6TWN11ROW
P.O. as 1" S/T, $""a QUOTE F.O.e. WSTiNAMN
AOtNtr TO stio►CA OMMMS, T" ?*w
N01TT ee TE Xi3 tTAT♦i uN►vExsm pp OPEs11110 t Pit Jan . 22 1985
Pvm+&Wr,Oma lNow 66 OPINING DATt AE IOPtNO.
FA. IN 113011 N.T. OWN" A" 101006141710111 MA+e IR OF OMMOe, Twr "m IN LOMA It" MAiq ~ ► . Oa~
r Cdwtrl C; UALte a10 :.rn
S10 t,D S AoINCT ASCSmNO A0011 tK WPS AND wow as
MISS OTMM*WM SFtOIMO WOW AE um AOORM OF /ti11 Sit 041, UCT~ONS 11 ON EACA 1 lrthoo41O Nu~
i STINAT MAN ADOVI S~OOEN AWIS TO DI ei V[wO0111 ~0 MAM611 L ~-~t~OO
NORTH TEXAS STATELWEASIV COWLVWTMALI V~ Name 04F+rw Cit;T of nenton
Crnu Aem" wr*~oVW COMMIoNS KLOW Hil
J:Nbti... ►OSooUtN ~a~R in %teeAi4.," 21: 'T.:inaey
: 900 -
X%**% no's I%m
..Groton, :e::as 7_
ntr ro UAW $1111110 M»nMna1 ouMlMft wT 1An rat!
You are invited to furnish North Texas State
University, Deaton, Texast with a bid for the
Job shown below, according to the attached
i documents.
Sealed bids will be received until 3:00 P X
o'clock on the bid opening date shown above,
Bids may be wiled to Physical Plant Dlreetoro
P.O. Box 13527, M.T. Station, Denton, Texas
76203, or brought to the Physical Plant office
at 2204 West Prairie Street. Mark Job title
on outside of bid envelope. All bid envelopes
*111" be opened and read aloud at the above time
and date. Bids received after bid opening will
not be considered. North Texas State University
reserves the right to reject any or all bids,
i and to waive any irregularities. Inspection
of site may be We by calling person shown
below at 817/565-2752.
For site inspection, contact; Paul Gooch
Job Title: Solid Waste Service
`f
I '
a, IM "W614 4.600 elArot 1M 610,W woof cruM. RAI ~MtrM N O'ddW now ti Fm. W0or0oA p.,11«w0, OEIIVEAr IN
W vwoM on rWr.w~.0 by 04 I~ a anyorr WAA, For PICA Ara, obrwsw a NkA01 No V*0WW M .Mbvw
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Purchasing Ageal - Dealoe, Teaat 76203 ! r 8 rye
9Wo►edq tats
r Oeh 22212181 i rJ{, Jan. 22, 1q185
g~a teats
Menlee a ate n -
Bidder Must hfi in +mo► Si ty of Benton
la o" o.., con P*"A . 1"9e04.1
scope:
ort Texas State University desires to enter into a contract with the
company offering the most advantageous proposition to the University.
This contract will be effective from March 1, 1985 through August 31,
1985 with an option to extend for 3(three) additional years, subject
to one
year intervals.
Prices are maximum and the University shall be protected against any
increase in price during the term of the contract. If there is a
reduction in the price during the term of the contract the price to NTSU
shall be reduced in t;ie amount and manner as the greatest reduction
in price granted to any political subdivision or segment of the trade.
OPTION CLAUSE: It is agreed that North Texas State University shall
R have t Fe op icon to extend the contract 3(three) additional years sub-
ject to one year intervals. Notice shall be served at least 60 days
prior to termination at which time the successful contractor shall
agree or disagree to the extension within 30 days.
ESCALATION CLAUSE: Should market conditions prevail which dictate an
increase the successful contractor may submit documentation requesting
permission to increase pricing 30 days before such extension becomes
effective. Escalation may only occur at the time of renewal and
ONLY upon supplying documented manufacturer's invoici,lg or other relevant
data which reflects the increase and securing the approval of the
Purchasing department in writing.
The term of the contract or the continuation of the contract, if con-
tinued, is contingent upon the availability of funds. Should funds
be unavailable or not appropriated by the legislature of the State of
Texas, the contract is subject to cancellation. The option is nain-
tained to reinstate and continue the contract should funds become
available within a reasonable length of time. Should funds not be
appropriated, neither the University nor any of its agents shall be
liable for discharging such obligations.
Cancellation
This contract may be cancelled by Worth Texas State University fo•:
any reason after giving 60 days written notice to the contractor. f
Nonassignable Contract
This contract is between !+orth Texas State University and the
selected contractor. The service provided in this agreement shall
not be further assigned to another agency except by expressed per-
mission by North Texas State University.
r'
NORTH 1 ERAS STATE UNIVERSITY a~~..w.
Purchasing Agent - Natoe, Tease 1610) Pole -+3 eI -8 tN"
OW OMi4leee .
1 ii~l i~85
Dsh eeeees$@ Jan. 2 2
Rg1YRa e e e e 1
Msrbr e1s111
No" 4so,eee City of Denton
` Biddix Mw+ Fi1! ~Il 1HIsr 1111111
ow UAW "WILbi go""W,
SAFETY:
r" In performance of the service the contractor shall protect the
work, adjacent property, and persons in a manner satisfactory to
the University. Special attention shall be given to the observa-
tion of all safety precautions so that the work will not damage
or endanger students, employees, property, or the general public.
The contractor shall be responsible for any damage or injury due to
any act of neglect attributable to persons working under his
direction.
The contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,
rules, regulations and orders of any public authority having
jurisdiction for the safety of persons or property to protect
them from damage, injury or loss.
In any emergency affecting the safety of persons or property, the
Contractor shall act, at his discretion, to prevent threatened damage,
injury or loss.
r
As a safety precaution, the vehicle(s) used by the contractor shall
have two operators at all times, with one person acting as flagman
at the rear of the vehicles(s) to warn pedestrians of its movement.
This person shall wear appropriate safety clothing and carry a
` warning flag during the time the vehicle(s) are making pickups.
There will be no movement of vehicles in the inter campus area
during class changes.
Conditions at Site or Building:
• The Contractor is responsible for having visited the site and
having ascertained pertinent local conditions such as location,
accessibility, and general character of the site or, building, the
character and extent of existing work within and adjacent to the site,
and other work being performed thereon at the time of the sub-
mission of his proposal. Any failure to do so will not releive him
r from responsibility for successfully performing the work without
additional expense to the owner.
1
References
Contractor should provide with the bid not less than three references
of similar service locations.
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Parchaiiai Agest • Destoe, Texas 76203 iaM of 8 - P"M
Jan. 85
` 0.0:8 1181 1 PAL
1 «pId115 11113
M"hr :goals
61jdK Mud FM In aw♦ N"o d a31a11 City of Denton
lw4w 8153111
V~4re R
r
Insurance:
` he ontractor shall not c=ence work under this contract until
he has obtained all the insurance required hereunder and certi-
ficates of such insurance have been filed with and approved by
the Owner. Approval of the insurance by the owner shall not
releive or decrease the liability of the Contractor.
The contractor. shall provide and maintain, until the Mork covered
in this Contract is completed and accepted by the Owner, the
minimum insurance coverages as follow:
Type of Coverage Limits of Liability
1. Worker's Compensation Statutory
2. Employer's Liability $100,000 $3009000
3. Comprehensive General Liability each occurrence aggregate
a. Bodily Injury $5003000
each occurrence
b. Property Damage $100,000 53009000
each occurrence aggregate
4. Comprehensive Automobile
Liability
a. Bodily Injury $300,000 $500,000
each person each occurrence
b. Property Damage $300,000
each occurrence
5. Umbrella Liability (Excess) $1,000,000
each occurrence
Bone: Contractors other than municipalities, upon written
notification of intent to award, shall provide NTSU with a Per-
formance Bond equal to 1.5 times the amount of the contractual
period. Said bonding document shall be provided to NTSU within 10
calendar days of written notification of intent to award or the bid
may be declared void. No purchase order for the ser%-ice to begin
will be issued until the bonding document is furnished to 1JTSU.
k
t
r
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY G,*4...
Nrchaeiel Altat - D.eto., T..at 7620I I. . ~ . .f Iqu
wow Its* January 22 85
L+lt.ttlw t t r t t
M.ri.r t 19 1
M..e of as tatt City OZ Denton
elddor Must FM in nowl► s+W 1:4113hest. o.. C"W w.. o1w►.ti I
Payment: The University will furnish the successful bidder with the
appropriate billing information. Payment will be made monthly
through standard University procedures.
Payment for completed work will be approved upon presentation of
an invoice outlining all services performed during the previous
billing period. Invoices must be presented and must reference the
NTSU purchase order number.
~RRe__gguired Service:
Afire use s a 1 be removed from the containers in the schedule
provided herein. No refuse shall be allowed to remain in the
containers after each emptying. Containers shall be left in an
orderly manner at the designated locations.
Pickup is to inclu~.e all boxes and crates, uncrated debris, in-
cluding all wet and dry garbage, etc.,within a 10 foot radius of
the container.
Driver of trash pickup vehicle(s) shall be responsible to pickup
trash that falls out of container during unloading operation.
E ui ment Specifications:
All collection vehicles shall be of such a design as to eliminate
the possibility of having trash blown from the bed; while traveling
from one location to the next, and trips made to the landfill. Con-
tractor shall demonstrate adequate backup capability to maintain the
required schedule for th- life of this contract.
The University dumpster locatioas are currently set up for a front
loading trash truck. Some areas may not acconodate a side loading
truck because of space limitations and or practicality. While side
loading trucks are not excluded from this bid it shall be the con-
tractors responsibility to make the pickups where the dumpsters are
currently.
University-Furnished Property:
Dumpsters will bfurnished under this contract. The duripsters are
designed for a front loading fork.
Personnel and Workmanshi :
The contractor will be required to furnish all qualified personnel
and adequately supervise their activities while perfornins this
contract. The contractor shall provide a full service representative
to rest;;ve any and all prpblems which may appear during the ccurse of
this contract.
10
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Nrrhaeiel Agent • News, Texas 7020!
Ill O/e~eMO a . s . 22, 0eh sass lost I /!L-Jan.
l.~e~Nlea s , a s a
Nstier aeaeaa
Bidd#r Mutt FM in weee► City of Denton
(Rom 0" c"or V" Cl►r.0y Re+seeleil
Work Hours:
Hours of pickup shall be approved by North Texas State University.
Dumping Areas:
10
The contractor shall be solely responsible for depositing the waste
material in an approved city, county or private sanitary landfill.
All landfill fees or costs are the responsibility of the contractor.
Holidays: NTSU observes unoFjual holidays. These holidays include
a couple of days at Thanksgiving, 7-14 days at Christmas, and
approximately 5 days in March for Spring Break. These holidays
float and are approved on an annual basis and therefore cannot be
specified in this bid. NTSU frequently does not observe national
holidays such as Memorial ray, Fourth of July, etc. but would
expect the successful bidder to make pickups on each day that the
University is open. For holiday periods that the University does
observe for which no pickups are required billing shall be reduced
on a per day basis based on the monthly rate divided by the number
of working days in that month.
Partial Closings: During surmner months some of our dormitories and
cafe terias are closed. The quantity of each is dependant upon sum-
mer enrollment. for periods when these areas are closed the billing
shall be reduced in accordance with pricing on -:he bid page in re-
gard to add ons and deletions.
Notification of Closings: Whether the closing is total (ie:Holidays)
or partial, a contractor will be given a minimum of 1 week prior
notice of such closings.
Additional Work or Deletions: NTSU reserves the right to add or
-ete plc ups by gzving tie contractor 2 weeks written notification
(Formal change notice). Said modification will be based on the
prices bid on the bid page in regard to add ons and deletions in
relation to the cubic yard difference. (This clause is in reference
to when NTSU acquires a new building or demolishes and old bi.:.ldina
and denotes a long term modification) °
F
10
NORM TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY 8_ F"s
PurcMmieo Agent - Deeios. Tesar 76201
OW 0*s.lgsame =►M Jan 22 It 85
Odo rrsssrrr -
tN.YMw :errs
N.sioe r s s s s s
ftw..lsrrrsr City of Denton
Bidder Mud Fh in ••N10 7" o» e`.:; vmtwot►e~ e....+.+t
Notes to Bidders:
percentage you show on t-he bid page is not absolutely
binding, and does not alter the escalation clause in the bid but it
will be a factor in determining the award of the bid. For example-
if you bid $1000.00 a year with 10% escalation factor and the bid
f states the option to extend the contract as being for 3 years then
your bid evaluation would be $4641.00 over a 4 year period for an
average of $1160.25($3500.00+$1100.00 + $1210.00 + $1331.00).
Please forcast this per=antage as accurately as possible. If you
anticipate no increase you may note 0% escalation factor.
2. Since Holidays and closings are unpredictable they will not be
considered in the evaluation of bids.
3. Bids must be on the form provided and be manually signed.
4. If as a bidder you are taking exception to any part of this
specification said exception must be in writing and submitted
with the bid. If the exception you list is unacceptable to NTSU
your bid may be-considered void. Questions regarding acceptable
exceptions should be directed to Paul Gooch and James Keffer.
S. The successful bidder will be reouired to obtain a Vendor
Identification number from the State Comptroller of Public
Accounts if the bidders firm does not already have the number.
Bid page:
1. Monthly solid waste pickup service based on attached $11.037 AO Mo.
route list.
2. Add-on/Deletion Rates $ 3.02 per pickup
a. 2 yard dumpster
$ &,..O~per pickup
b. 4 yard dumpster
c, 6 yard dumpster $.9-06 per pickup
d. 8 yard dumpster 112.08 per pickup
3. The anticipated percent of annual escalation at the time of
each renewal, (should options to extend a contract derived from
this bid be exercised.), is 0 ; for each additional year.
The contract is in all Things performable and enforcable in
Denton County, Texas. In the event of any breach of this agreement
by the contractor NTSU stall be entitled to recover from the con-
tractor all damages together with reasonable attorney's fee and court
costs.
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Purchasiey Aleut • Deetos, Texas 1420) d 8 h*M
O~ih0ii ISIS f 111 Jan. 22, 1 94
x ~.ri11a m a t e $
WIZ eeeeae
Bidder Mud Fin in onn; fw. It as t as i as City of nentein
IRSOM Ow COT L%hu A*«,.W itmMI
ROUTE LIST(*Daily means once per day, 6 days a week, Monday-Saturday)
1. Physical Plant One eight yd. dumped daily
2, Physical Plant Two six yd. dumped twice per week
3 Physical Plant One four yd. dumped twice per week
4. Physical Education One six yd. dumped four times weekly
f S. Chilton Hall One four yd. dumped twice per week
6. Music Building One eight yd. dumped daily
7. Administration Bldg. One four yd. dumped daily
6. Library One four yd. dumped daily
9. Hospital/McConnell One eight yd. dumped daily
10. Bruce Hall One eight yd. dumped daily
11. Bruce Cafeteria One eight yd. dumped daily
12. Masters Hall One eight yd. dumped daily
13, Marquis Hall One six yd. dumped daily
14. Science Research Bldg. One eight yd. dumped daily
15. Industrial Technology One eight yd, dumped three times weekly
16, Power Plant Four eight yd. dumped daily
17. Art Bldg. One six yd. dumped daily
18. Kendall Hall one eight yd. dumped daily
19. Highland Hall One four yd. dumped daily
I' 20. Wooten Building One six yd. dumped daily
21: Print Shop Two six yd. dumped daily
22. Union Building Two eight yd. dumped twice per clay
23. Speech 6 Drama One six yd. dumped daily
24. Houston Hall one two yd. dumped once weekly
25. Eagle Arms Apts. One eight yd. dumped twice weekly
26. Kerr East Three two yd. dumped twice daily
27. Kerr West One two yd. dumped twice daily
28. Kerr Cafeteria Two eight yd. dumped daily
29. Maple Hall One six yd. dumped daily
30. Maple Cafeteria One six yd. dumped daily
31. Clark Hall One six yd. dumped daily
32. Clark Cafeteria One eight yd. dumped daily
33. Crumley Hall one six yd. dumped daily
34, Quads One eight yd. dumped four times per week
35. West Cafeteria One six yd. dumped daily
36. Advancement Center One two yd. dumped three times per week
37. Suliivant Center One four yd. dumped twice per week
38. Oak St. Hall One six yd. dumped three times per week
39. NTSU Apartments Two six yd. dumped three times per week
40 Coliseum Two six yd. dumped twice weekly
41. Golf Course one four yd. dumped twice weekly
42. ;'lens Gym One four yd, dumped three times per week
43. `fissile Base Two four yd. dumped once per week
10
Page 1 of 3 Pages
CITY OF DENTON
EXCEPTIONS% Al THROUGH 15
j EXCEPTION 11 (Reference page 2, sections entitled "Scope," "Option
Clause," and "Cancellation")
The proposed service to the University requires substantial investment
by the City for equipment and personnel, the sole application of which
k would be waste collection at the University. However unlikely, it is
1 nonetheless essential that Denton citizens be protected from any eventu-
ality in which extremely expensive capital and labor resources are idle.
r Therefore, the City takes exception to the sixty-day cancellation clause
f as written in the bid document and proposes instead that the agreement
be considered binding throughout its entire term as outlined in the
section entitled, 'Scope." The City does recognize, however, that the
contract may be cancelled by either party for just cause, -)rovided the
offended party gives written notice sixty (60) days before such cancel-
lation i; to be effective.
f
EXCEPTION 02 (Reference page 5, section entitled "Required Service")
Texas Department of Health Regulation Chapter 325, Subchapter a dictates
procedures that may constrain activities described by the bid document.
(A copy is appended for your convenience.) Neither the City nor another
vendor may agree to participate in collection activities which •liolate
Federal, State, or local waste-handling regulations.
EXCEPTION A3
Ax,thorized waste tored in conformance with such applicable zegulations
will be removed by the City where within a ten-foot radius of a regular-
ly serviced container, provided the rwnber of tines such overage is
thusly placed for disposal does not exceed twenty-percent (20%) of the
total number of services provided to that collection point during any
calendar month. In which case, the City will notify the University of
the need for increased container capacity or service frequency at said
a.
10
Page 2 of 3_ Pages
collection point, and the City will accordingly amend both the col-
lection schedule and the monthly fee charged the University. The
University may refuse such adjustment whe-A initially notified by the
City, but may no longer require the city to collect waste not deposited
in dumpsters at the collection point in question.
Should dumpsters be overloaded so as to make them unserviceable, addi-
tional charges may be made to the University for costs incurred by the
City in its efforts to restore the serviceability of the containers in
question. For example, the removal and disposal of large quantities of
' construction material (e.g., rock, iron, concrtte, soil) and/or wettu]
garbage may require the application of additional equipment and person-
nel, the cost of which would be billed to the University.
A separate agreement will be required between the City and the Universi-
ty for the collection and disposal of special wastes. (Sae :sxas
Department of Health Regulation 325.136.)
The City cannot collect or dispose of hazardous waste (See Texas
Department of Health Regulation 325.291 - 325.316.)
EXCEP`ON 14
The effective date of March 11 1985, for this agreement is based on a
scheduled delivery date of February 25, 1985, for the new front-end
loading truck to be purchased by the city for service to North Texas
State University.
£XCEPTIOV 45
By law, this proposal is subject to Denton city Council's review and
approval of a contract between the City of Denton and the University
that would restate the terms and conditions of thi.; proposal as submit-
ted.
1
.
r
f Page 3 of 3-- Pages
A
Er.
r
REFERENCES
1. Moore Business Forms
1700 Woodbrook
Denton, Texas 76201
7. Winn-Dixie
' 1115 Ave. C
Denton, Texas 76201
3. Wyatt's Cafeteria
1008 W. University
Denton, Texas 76201
4. GTE
310 W. Hickory
Denton, Texas 76201
S. Skaggs Alpha-Beta
2321 University
Denton, Texas 76201
6. Golden Triangle Mall
2201 1-35
Denton, Texas 76201
7. Peterbilt
Air,-)ort Road
Denton, Texas 7620'
8. Green Giant Factory
(Pillsbury Comp: .y)
1725 Cooper Creek
Denton, Texas 76201
9. Victor Equipment Company
2800 Airport Road
Denton, Texas 76201
10. Russell Newman
320 E. Hickory
Denton, Texas 76201
Additional references available upon request.
I
r
325.21
SUBCHAPTER B. Municipal Solid-Waste Storage.
4325.21 Applicability. This subchapter shall be applicable tainers shall be of suitable strength to min;mize animal
to all public and private storage systems. Additional re- scavenging or rupture during collection operations,
r quirements for stooge of hazardous wastes are contain- (2) Reusable Containers. Reusable containers
ed to 44325.271.325.330 of this title (relating to Hazard- shaft be maintained in a clean condition so that they do
ous Waste Managtment). not constitute a nuisance and to retard the harborage,
4325.22 Storage Regairemeats. All solid waste shall be feeding, and propagation of vectors.
stored in such a manner that it does not constitute a fire, (A) All containers to be emptied manually
safety, or health hazard or provide food or harborage shall be capable of being serviced without '.ne collector
for animals and vectors, and shall be contained or bun- coming into physical contact with the sf )d waste.
i~ dled to as not to result in litter. It shall be the respon- (B) Containers to be mechanically handled
sibility of the occupant of a residence or the owner or shall be designed to prevent spillage or leakage during
manager of an establishment to utilize storage containers storage, handling, or transport.
of an adequate size and strcagth, and In sufficient num- 1325,24 Citizens' Collection Stations. Citizens' collection
bers, to contain all solid waste that the residence or other stations should be provided with the type and quantity
establishment generates in the period of time between of containers compatible with the areas to be - --ved.
collections. Rules should be posted governing the use of the facility
4325.23 Approred Containers. All solid waste contain- to include who may use it, what may or may not be
i ing food wastes shall be stored In covered or closed con- deposited, etc. The responsible county or municipal
tainers which are leakproof, durable, and designed for government shall provide for the collection of deposited
r safe handling and easy cleaning. waste on a scheduled basis and supervise the facility in
(1) Nonreusable Containers. Nonreusable con- order to maintain it in a sanitary condition.
10 (7/12/83)
111
10
7SU
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
r Office of the Vice Pres.dent
For Administrative AMairs
April 4, 1985
City of Denton
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Attn: Sill Angelo
Dear Sir,
On March 14, 1985, Mr. Paul Gooch spoke with Mr. Joe LaSeau regarding an
exception stated on your response to our Invitation to Bid Number PP-85-20
(Solid Waste Service).
Your "Exception >il" regards the "Cancellation" statement and "Option Clause".
r The cancellation statement reads "This contract may be cancelled by North
Texas State University for any reason after giving 60 days written notice
to the Contractor". Said statement is amended by replacing the words "any
reason" with "Just cause".
` The Option Clause and Escalation Clauses must remain. No State agency can
legally commit funds which have not been appropriated by the State Legislature.
However, it is obvious that NTSU will continue to have solid waste for disposal.
Our current plan is to have the City of Denton provide solid waste services,
as a minimum, from June 1, 1985, through August 31, 1985, on one purchase
F order. Service from September 1, 1985, through August 31, 1986, will be on a
separate purchase order to accomodate fiscal year accounting/payment functions.
If the above terms and statements are satisfactory, please co-sign the at-
tached copy as accepted. Return then to James Keffer, P.O. 13527, Denton,
Texas 76203. This is not a contract, but rather a post-bid clarification.
Sincerely,
Frederick R, Pole
Vice President for
Administrative Affairs
Attachment
Tip
P 0 BOX 13737 DENTON, TEXAS 7C -1-3737
+817, "`4107 METRO 1157-+652
COPY
INSTRUCTIONS '[0 BIDDERS:
@Texas
The back side of the "Invitatica to Bid"(Form 87A) state
cites rules and regulations governing bids issued by University
North Texas State University. These rules are applicable Denton.Taaas
for all goods and or services procured by sealed bid 762"
process and paid for by state funding. Physical
Plant
Though all of the regulations are pertinent please
make:special note of sections: 1.19 1.20 1.61 1.79 2.1 6
4.1. Should a problem occur with a bid it will usually
be covered by one or more of these sections.
Regarding Section 1.6 ("Texas Vendor Identification
Number"), the Comptroller of Public Accounts ra;tuires
this number on all invoices to be paid with state funds.
i. No payment from state funding can be made to a %endor
with out a vendor I.D. number. In contractual situations >
this number must be existing prior to the beginning of
any work to be paid by state funds.
AsListance in securing the Vendor I.D. Number may be
obtained by phone at the Comptroller of Public Accounts
office area code $12-475-2707 or toll free from anywhere
in Texas at 1-800-252-5555.
The Texas Application form for Vendor Identification numbers
may be obtained through:
Bob Bullock
Comptroller of Public Accounts
Revenue Processing Division
111 East 17th
Austin, Texas 78711
Attn: Vendor File Section
Thank you,
James Keffer
Supervisor of Stores
NTSU Physical Plant
JK/eml
2204 W. Prairie-Box 13527-N.T.Station-AC817-788-2751
' DATE: May 14, 1985
C I H (,0(JNC [l. REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor ,lid Members of the City Council
FROM: Chris Hartung, City Mana er
r
i SUBJECT., APPROVAL OF PLATS AND REPIM S
RECOI.NENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval
of the following:
1. Bellaire Heights Addition Phase One-Final Plat of Lot
16, Block C
2. Johnson Addition-Preliminary Plat of Lot 1, Block 1
3. Northside Addition-Preliminary and Final Replats of Lots
6-15, Block 4
4, W. J. Wheeler Addition-Preliminary and Final Replats of, j
Lot 7-A, Block 1
5. Wimbleton Village Addition, Phase IV Tra t A-Preliminary
and Final Replat of Lot 1, Block 14
r
PROGRA:•IS, GEPARTAENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED.
I
FISCAL 1APACT;
f
Respecttu/l v , 3 ra' feu:
C
arts sr ung
City 'lerrager
I
Prepared by:
<,yitaA~- -
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
App ve
Jeff V eye%
Director of Planning and Conununity Development
CITY COUNCIL AGFND^.
BACK-LIP SUMMARY SFICET
MEETING DATE: May 140 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the final replat of the Bellaire
• Heights Phase One Addition, Lot 16, Block C
SUMMARY: This tract is 0.156 acres located south of
Weston Drive and west of Bellaire Street. This
tract is more fully described as Lot 16, Block C
alid shown in the M. Yeachum Survey, Abstract
1442, Denton, Texas. The property is zoned
SF-?0 and a single family residence is
anticipated.
City services and facilities, includin4 :;atPr;
gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, end
solid waste are available.
The plat; conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
The purpose for the replat is to relocate the
southern property line on Lot 16.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES: T,enial of the replat
ATTACHMENT: Rrduceu plat
t CC. if Ci
Cecil(, Carson
Urban Planner
11629(3)
t _.[!t4[2__!_~ 4-
ePwrttllRtRr
I II
16 ~lrt ' 'e
e L o c K c
RW~P14~b[ 0,lS/ AC. a a,~
l ~1
~p T1 to II
l II
tAlloiDOt ADOI TIo~
floss Ut7PON ~W
I~ toot t, Rt T f.RD01.
1LOCN C. OT t
` I
w
swa
NUAW
ww
k
WIG""
N
w
t
M
VICINITY MAP
1"12,000,
AEPLAY OF
BEL_AIRE HEIGHTS
PHASE ONE OWNER
DANNY ALL S
991N/ A REPLAY OF LOT
is, L:OCM cl i1LLAI111I
NEI/HTl, ►NAIE ONE,
AEC. CAN. C, F4. tllj PA=.T.
M. YOACHUM ItMY 1.•1441
C,Y I 0 COUNTY oP saw","ota
4RAPHIC P11T
I
D, FIELDS I
RECEIVEE h4AR2 C 1985
I
10
1 P ~:Qda'C L ij A6ENOA
, ~.Izl 9Akt( SdriBP
MEE'PfNG DA'Z'E: May 140 I'jd-)
SUBJECT: Preliminary plat of the Johnson Addition, Lot 11
Block 1
• SUMMARY: This tract is 0.365 acres located at the
southwest corner of Dallas Drive and Teasley
Lane. This tract is more fully described as Lot
1, Dlock 1 and shown in the S. C. Hirams Survey,
Abstract 616, Denton, Texas. The property iv
zoned commercial, and a commercial development
is anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
gag, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
ACTION REUJIRED: Approval of the plat
RECOMME14DA'TfON: Phe Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Denial of the plat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Ck u Ci 1.•ae v
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
11108/7
r
f
09
rt l
~sr T.. I
/ t l rtir
el~~,. iii / 0 /
t c O cL
/LOT I I BLbCK I
4p /
O.3 58 Ao.\
4~,ItS'~ ~ S tOMME NCUIL LONE
` 44 ~ ? r s No a
C1VI~ Ur~1 ~~KE 1444 N d'
Ery, S /
6spo
FNELIVINANI FLAT
OYIIRR
JOHNSON ADDITION DON ^N
LOT I, BLOCK 1
0.365 Ac.
S. C. HIRAM$ SURVEY A-616
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
i
1
RI;CFIV I,r APR 31 85
I
i
I
E
CIPY COUN'-IL AJEFWA
BACK-UN SJ14MARY SHEEP
E
I
MEFEINJ DATE: May 14, 1945
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final replats of
the Northside Addition, Lots 6-15, Block 4
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 1.9..5 acres situated at the
southwest corner of North Elm and Third Streets. 1
This tract is more fully d,scribed as Lcts 6-15,
Block 4, and shown in the BBB & CRR Co. Survey,
Abstract 185, Denton, Texas. The property is
zoned office (0) and an office development is
anticipated. The purpose of the replat is to
create one lot.
City services and facilities, including water,
gas, sanitary sever, telephone, electrical, and
kr solid waste, are availarle.
t ripe replat conforms to the minimum requirements
of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replats
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNA'PIVES: Denial of the preliminary and final replats 1
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plats
CA (~'L Cake _
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
U813J
ElS RE ET IYnow i~
r
P {11
3~1 04
I a! r
,J ~ • _ ~ i J t 1 TJ ~ O
t. f(
Q'
0
C,' e i e §
Y I 4 ^ w f i~ ~ ~i J
N N o
1
art y i<t',a s ~ ° ( 1n
m I
o r o Q o
1.. o tia } s
-i i
I r i ro r' r •
la ~
'00. if a T'
•1
ir)Mti•Nrf l.o~•`LUWSS STREET ( ' Raw,• ~ 4•y
fill'
PM
ga Y
C-
00
{
j m ELM STREET loo' Row)
~ 17 7) ~ QY 1~~,
I♦rf ,~...,1oi"% x. Co.
4Yoi >r lei ai ' i ,
rte; I r• r 1 r r r; r r X;
° U i 0 o V I a o o, o o . B
• ' i0 I IA J .9r 71 IT A t4 :CD1
g i v,xk U ~ l`
.-I. r A
14
' ' M rY s y mH -1
r. t r r' r C t-JI r n r r
CY U ``7' O D U Q Oi Q U Q
j ~ I ..q a~ I .-I ~ -I i •i I O i •a f -1 ~ r r Y
N u w . u; to ~ v. i i m ~
A ~ I 2 p I~I~I ;
B
_ LOCUST STREET (td Row)
I A t
A ,
~is: 3 r t:31 ; 'tY:y i s.•~i1 i•3 :rsF? 8ieictid ~y;
j♦7
7 iR ;713 . M«~ 1::a •~i '\.P
i G7 ' rr = •i~y« ~ ~ i 1~ 7 1?f , n3 a f. ! ~ ii ~
A ' .r r r'!r r 71♦' !f
s ~flE : y if i •3 S;s ~ _ 7:• i• } a 's t;r ~
['.Orr;
• ••IV V. • t d If46: y VI ~1!♦~ 11•-1 1~~ f
fir
ylr
' tt :f : f i 1.4
4St7.{ r0 ~ ~ ~ =f3 i3;11 ~ f' S:~ ' i 'i
z H n
40
0r v z P
orn
8
1r,•<•i" " O n : :li; °.;1~ Si ,t; 11 flf~ 7:f' ,
rjF ;5
" N' fps. ~Ir i s: f# !f ;
A ~3~i i !1j i •.i f! i 1
i
N
11
f
I
~t
fl
Er '
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-Up SUMMARY SHEET
I
MEETING DATE: May 14, 1985
Approval of ~:he preliminary and final replat of
SUBJECT: the W. J. Wheeler Addition, Lot 7-A, Block 1
I
h !
This is a tract of 0.6422 acres located on the
SUMMARY:
i west side of Elm Street between University Drive
and College Street. This tract is more fully
described as Lot 7Block 11, and shown Tin the
BBB & CRR Survey, Abstract The property is zoned general retail (GRh and F.
multi-family development is anticipated.
h
~ ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replat
P RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVES: Denial of the preliminary and final replat
` ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Cec a Carson
Urban Planner
0839) 2)
10
iY
o r
i ~ ^ O
A 7
At
• i u L I r
r
• Ik _ NB6•LI'L2"C 1728d -
171 71
' 11 A ~ I o: ~FH
1 ~ aY1 I^ 4' 4
~ ~ 1 j ~1 • 5~~ N j a
11 r i o r l= J i~
Pt i, 4 I ` l ui 6
, A Ni +i ~ / V r
pp I
i ii 'u, R IIF{ an.
B i
_ IB 171 44'
l' rr
aL
wit, I II.I0'J7'W 172.90 v
1j ~ e 1 I ~ \ INt b,• y /i
M . o
0
IIA
aa~7 ~oRB~ t ~kk23 ~1 - ISKy7 ~ { - ~ i i3 ^R•~ `
oil i~
G r i 1 A 2
gel 3;
F-5 I
-k) Z8 4
SS kk s A ia~
L
L• S j
F 2A s 1
~i"E lea e9 w h i ~iFr
;d fir. ^J ~ r e
I ro _
u
~i
{ r
le
i , ~ • r
r V
1 ~ l~~l ~ 1 ~11s ~ I ~
I ~ N
1 I ~I O i
I • ~ o~
o! I ~ ~ o i O r5i
w :
a
I ~ 4~ s
111.4 4'
PJO I Y. I tee'40'37 )N
l i 3 m - Rx•~ t r r 'i yxsi i i a R i .i iE ~ ~
f ~ C ~ l~ •R` F~~ ~~':i ~ ~ ; ~ ,i+~~~ yg pie" ~"r ~k ! ~ !i ?~i~~ ie
f ~ ~ sS§ r~a, k ; i ;e. st ~ t%~i ~ x~ 3 i1 y' t~
7J i . N ~ Ci~ ~ a r t p ' cry :t ie t spt~ yi
•+„I ~ ~ri i is ~ s p
~ ►Rg b~is ~te E~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i~i
X-4 t# x !~Aii~ g° ° r r:t
3
chi t 3 p~ s IrFI S
i All
r %%z ty a { g~t
pa:
ee ~cx: is F. i 8
8
r.i y;~• P- S • E all
14
8 :6: CCt a a ,eri
~ ~ jig a
Y ~xA • ~ ~ iR4
i s~,'y 3t! 3ti
N
N
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
~ E
MEETING DATE: May 14, 1985
SUBJECT: Preliminary and final replat of the Wimbleton
Village Addition, Phase IV, Tract A, Lot 1,
Block 14
SUMMARY: This tract is 0.3475 acres located on the
southeast corner of Winston Drive and State
School Road. This tract is more fully described
as Lot 1, Block 14 and shown in the MEP & PRR
Survey, Abstract 9500 Denton, Texas. The
property is in a planned development district
j and a single family use is anticipated.
City services and facilities, including water,
j gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and
solid waste are available.
The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of
the Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
The purpose is to create one single family lot.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.
ALTERNATIVE: Denial of the preliminary and final replat
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
11749
1
10,
1 14
01,1 6~ ti 1e~ a+ 1 •o. •2 'f
s 'N
0 1,
1 14,
• I a , ~ yyY gip. / ~ l.~~r, ` ~
41 0
• ~ f ~ Ord f/ 9 , ~ 1••' 0l~0 ~
Its
J
smog-'- ? -
T
I•:r
lit
all ai of ea~lb ~ee~•Ei n~ o ~i 1111ij if
0a.
=f ~A `E l~s.~ ~ b~ . ~3;~8 ~ ! a s', ~iinl44
oLis 01,~~ll
« e $ 9 b dp~d~ i~ e4e 'Y ii Ilyapri~~
gig
J~
J.3 . z lil e~
e fix
u r 0A r-
w
Voo
a i.
PA'P` :i•'•iL' \ ~ ~
` r
J \ G
R8 lk
J R ~iy r., i y0 •I,
3 ~r~ 1 s1
• b
~ RR'~EA~ ~ ~ ~I ~•I 9~ al E)R~?~ i =EE p_ ~ a a r'E E;~' s
> ; e~ i ~iE9 E1 za i~;i~ a~ ds a la a Its gg
-r a a e pi c t, Yp
t ; p; Y E' ;Iglu j
~ i i~ ~a
; iep5 •}~5Ar E ON
sn E)n~~ ~ " i ~iiIN
s d A' ii ^e'i~ E 3 is
4! ~J~~) g i ~t~ Ec'ii E ~'°-!gar ~~~Yli:~i~ •y~~$
•i 9 S ~ • sia ii0
a° a zriaE ~ P.R i°~d- E @~`- aA 4 ;VIA
j~atE~~ ~ 6A~.) ~a) ~ ki f~Y~~♦ 4~ b;i 3ta•A ~ E
fEi.J d .ra •iE"~ i E* a' E°p~i: a~p fps= B
ss py
19 ~ !$EAE s~`E£ )'fi= f•~~i ~ Eae ~QE~fe €„~i~.i
is Wi t
a.
ti
v
v
P R
I
' APR I r I
LAN DING
April 159 1985
1
Charlotte Allen
City Secretary
215 E, McKinney
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Ms, Alleni
i
I am writing to request permission for a banner to be hung across
Avenue E from NTSU Freshman Orientation in July until the second
week of the fall semester in September.
` The banner will be 3 inches high x 25 feet long and will welcome
` students.
We would appreciate your consideration of this request.
Thank you,
Myrna a chez
Sales an ger
MS/mg
218 Avenue E Denton, TX 76203 817/5659902
FROM
DATE: 05/14/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
Mayor and Members of the City Council I
T0:
FROM: 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
' I
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CASE Z-1730
¢ECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this item at its
meeting of April 10, 1985 and voted to recommend approval of Z-1730
i' with conditions by a vote of 7-0.
SUMMARY -
This is a request for a change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district to the planned development (PD) classification on a 14 acre
tract located along the east side of Riney Road, adjacent and south
of Hwy 77 and north of Windsor Drive. If approved, the planned
development will permit the development of 31 single family detached
lots and a retiremont/recovery center.
BACKGROUND:
The intensity/density standard for this low intensity area will not
be exceeded if this request is approved. The plan for the
retirement/recovery center is fairly consi.tcnt with policies for
diversified land use in low intensity areas and appears to have the
support of neighboring property owners.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
ti Respectful) submitt s
• s~~
G. Chris Hartung Q
Prepared by: City Manager
J 1nJ !LA /.L'f1
Denise Spli(ey~-
Urban Planner
Appr ed:
Jeff Me r
Director o Pla ping
and Community Development 11818
,T
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMMISION
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Denton City Council
Case No.: Z-1730 Meeting Date: May 14, 1985
` GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Ana Rocco Pena
4300 Valleycrest Drive
Arlington, TX 76103
Status of Applicant: Owner
Requested Action: Change in zoning from the agricul-
tural (A) classification to the
planned development (PD) district
Purpose: Single family detached and retirement
recovery center
Location and Size: 14.0734 acre parcel located along the
east side of Riney Road, adjacent and
south of Hwy 77 and north of Windsor
t Drive at a point approximately 220
r feet east of the intersection of Rine
Road and Windsor Drive
Existing Land Use: Single family residential, triplex,
and vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and zoning: North - Single family, agricultural;
SF-16, A
South - Single family; SF-7, SF-10
East - Single family, agricultural,
vacant; At MF-1
West - Single family, vacant, park
land; At S -130
Northeast - Multi-family, townhomes,
vacant, institutional; PD-81
MF-1, MF-R, PD
Denton Development Guide: Area is designated as low intensity.
(Case Z-1730)
Page Two
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Drainage: Drainage is a major consideration at
this site. The proposed development
can be designed satisfactorily in
terms of drainage facility capacity
if adequate green space and other on-
site facilities are designed properly. 1
i Detention will be required on the
southern part of the property.
Culverts w.11 be required under Riney
Road to carry water to the west.
Transportation: This property has approximately 11700
feet of frontage along Riney Road, an
unimproved collector. If approved,
the developer will be responsible for
dedicating appropriate right-of-way
and providing pavement, and curb and
gutter improvements to half of Riney
Road.
A 42 foot portion of the tract fronts
Windsor Drive at a point beginning
approximately 220 feet east of the
intersection of Riney Road and Windsor
Drive.
This site has approximately 970 feet
of frontage along Hwy 77, a primary
major arterial, maintained by the
state. The planned development
concept plan shows a rerouting of
Riney Road that will intersect Hwy
77.
All access points should be at 900
angles and must conform to Subdivisio
Regulations. Sidewalks will be
required as per the Subdivision
Regulations.
Public Utilities: Adequate electrical, telephone and
gas service is available for
extension to this site. T;Aere is a
16" water line in Riney Road on the
west side of this tract and a 6"
water line in Hwy 77 along the north
side of this tract. There is an 8"
sanitary sewer in Hwy 77 extending
along half of the north side of this
tract.
(Case Z-1730)
Page Three
ZONING HISTORY
The City Council denied the request for a change in zoning from
agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classifi^ation
for 118 multi-family and 41 two family units on this same 14.0'1
acre tract on May 17, 1983 (Z-1575). Considerable opposition
from the Northridge community appeared to be a factor, and
questions about drainage were also stated as a concern of the
City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval of Z-1576 by a vote of 5-1 with three conditions.
Staff also recommended approval of the request.
The City Council also denied the request for a change in zoning
from the agricultural (A) to the planned development (PD) classi-
fication for single family detached housing (15 lots with a
typical size of 80' X 1101), single family attached (townhomes -
56 units), and duplexes (13 lots with 26 units) on this tract on
February 7, 1984. Considerable opposition from the Northridge
community again appeared to be a factor in the City Council's
decision.
ANALYSIS
This property is located in a low intensity area which has been
designated by the Denton Development Guide as one of the primary
residential areas of the City. The provision of 31 single
family detached lots in this development obviously complies with
Development Guide policies. The intensity standard for this
area will not be exceeded with the approval of this development
due to the ?.arge amount of undeveloped, agricultural property in
this area.
Diversified land use is permitted in low intensity areas as long
as: (1) there is strict site plan control within one block of
existing low density residential development so that the
character of the area can be maintained, (2) traffic planning
insures access by a collector street or larger nd traffic dons
not flow through local streets, (3) the overall density/intensity
standard is not violated, (4) Eufficient green space and
recreational facilities are provided, (5) there (s input into
planning by the neighborhood.
The site plan for the development shows a three story 58,000
square foot retirement/recovery center. Seventy-two parking
spaces are adequate for the proposed use. Access to the
retirement/recovery center is shown on the proposed rerouting of
Riney Road. This plan would feature a cul-de-sac at
(Case Z--1730)
Page Four
ANALYSIS (Continued)
the northern terminus of the old Riney Road and eliminate its
intersection with US Hwy 77.
The site plan shows adequate setbacks and parking for the
retirement/recovery center. Ingress-egress is currently located
on the proposed 60' collector street. The overall density/
intensity standard for this area will not be exceeded if this
request is approved. The developer has met with interested
neighbors several times and has reported that property owners
are generally supportive of the new plan.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and zoning Commission recommends approval of z-1730
by a vote of 7-0 with the following conditions:
1. The overall density level of the entire tract shall not
exceed 7.9 units per acre.
2. The retirement/recovery center shall be limited to 80 units.
3. The developer shall dedicate appropriate right-of-way and
provide necessary off-site street and drainage improvements
in accordance with City of Denton requirements along half of
Riney Road from the southern terminus of the road to the
beginning of the proposed new alignment of Riney Road. The
developer will be required to pay total cost for that
section of Riney Road within the development (no City
participation in oversizing).
4. All single family detached lots shall be a minimum of 81000
square feet in size.
5. A six foot solid wood fence shall be erected along the
southern boundary of the retirement/recovery center tract.
6. Care of alcoholic or narcotic patients is prohibited.
7. The use of the building designated as "retirement/recovery
center" on the concept plan will be limited to providing
lodging, meals, and nursing care for ill or elderly persons
only.
8. If the single family dwellings are two-story, no windows on
the second floor will face existing developed property.
9. The single family dwellings and retirement center shall be
of masonry construction.
will
be h allowed property to flow subdivided across the n north developed, line of drainage
10. not When
the n Dane
property.
11. All dwellings shall be a minimum of 1,600 square feet in
size.
12. Existing Riney Road shall become a cul-de-sac at its northern
terminus to prevent direct access onto Highway 77. Plans
for installation of cul-de-sac are required at time of
platting. Actual cul-de-sac must be installed when initial
development occurs.
(case z-1730)
Page Five
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3. Approve petition without conditions
4. Deny petition
ATTACHMENTS
4
1. Map 11
2. PD Concept Plan
3. Memo from Jerry Clark, City Engineer
4. Reply Forms Total
5. Property Owner List
6. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes of the meeting of
April 10, 1985
a
i
i
I,
1088<1
Y • I
\1 is ti \
\ t• F
rr ~f ~ r
' s0 e
Ile
top .9
aR+>rL~L \ ~r+f `
0%
r OLOCK C ~ ~ ` pro
0
CUM
RfRi g/LR'Af [ ? ` ~Q
+ ETI MENT 4 NU IN CE R
\ \ 4
Hrf • aLr.
sf r • ! ~
11 'f is N I l
f
I _ n.
eL j f+
I I~ u
BL G C
Ole I
~ I
1 a 0
e1 fe U
e UR
I
" Z
+
♦d • OL t~
4 / / • 7 e yR I
I/(
FA
+ I ~ Q
J y~ ~a / I
I /fr
1 I ! f p ~yt! to
1. ~I 1
• ' '
,M1 i ~ I
I / I
r. v x~
CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN TON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE(817)566.8200
A E M 0 R A N D U M
DATE: April 4, 1985
TO: Denise Spivey, Urban Planner
FROM Jerry Clark, City Engineer
RE: Z-1750
The tract has several items regarding public infrastructure
that are outlined balow.
1. Riney Road in a collector street -411- (60' right-of-way)
that is being rerouted to match Donna Street. We are
asking that the connection match what Donna Street will
look like wick a 250' radius that connects in at a 900
angle, since this intersection will be signalized, it is
very important for these two roads to meet exactly. On the
same line, the current connection of Riney Road (seal
coated) should be discontinued with a cul-de-sac if this
project plan is followed and adopted.
Tne developer should perimeter pave the b40' along the west
in a regular manner. Then a choice exists between
requirin$ the developer to pave all of Riney (including the
City's 7 in the middle) or requiring perimeter paving of a
cul-de-sac street (old Riney) along about 40U' to the nortci
west.
2. Lots 1-5, Block A, should be redesigned with a private
access easement entering off Riney. This will prevent
another driveway in the strip fronting on Windsor. The
developer would gain another lot by doing this from part of
Lot S.
3. The corner piece of land of 0.333 acres should be
considered at least partially for street right uedication
for Highway 77.
page 2 of 2 pages
4. Sidewalks should be placed along Riney Road and Highway 77.
5. Drainage is a fairly major concern as this tract should be
directed to the collection basin just north of Windsor.
' Detention should be used to offset runoff increases as per
policy. Drainage to the west in the northern portion
should be handled with a culvert under Riney, no detention
required.
Please advise if further information is needed.
Jerzy 1. r , P.E.
City 'ni er
j is
f 110265E
I
i
i
i
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
2-1730
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received None Received Jimmy a Bernie Brown
405 W. University
Denton, TX 76201
382-7102
i
i
1
46
r
i
PROPERTY OWNER LIST - 2-1730
J. Newton Rayzor Joe C. Thomas
1204 W. University 700 Northridge
I` Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
E Ralph Cordray Billy C. Payne
1306 Hickory 624 Northridge
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
Franklin Daniel Grady McEwin
c/o A.S.P. Raposa 3101 Donna
225 N. Locust Denton, TX 76201
Denton, TX 76201
Edward R. Cottle Jerome H. Borth
Rt. 5, Box 55 3105 Donna
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
Richard L. Riney Dale Brown
1112 Linden 718 N. Elm
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
Charlie Melvin Cunningham E. L. Newland
j 2114 Robfnwood
Rt. S. Box 30
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
1 Anna Rocco Pena John Montgomery
31
4300 Valley Crest Road 18 Donna
Arlington, TX 76013 Denton, TX 7b201
Patrick Parker Robert R. Verbosh
3106 Donna
Box 1x14
f Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
Harris Troy, inc. Tarrant Bank
622 Magnolia P.O, Box 2368
Denton, TX 76201 Ft. Worth, TX 76113
Melvin R. Dane Edward Sachet
1028 Sanger Road 4405 I-35, Suite 13
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
' Roy D. Martin Jimmy Date Brown
810 Sanger Rd. 405 W. University
Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201
E. Deate Headlee
418 Magnolia
Denton, TX 7620.
Billy Crawford
706 Northridge
Denton, TX 76201
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 10, 1985
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
Cite of Denton, Texas was held un Wednesday, April 10, 1985, at
S:C p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building.
Present: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, R. B. Escue Jr., Gary Juren,
Robert LaForte, Tom Pearson and Andy Sidor
Absent: None
Present from Staff: David Ellison, Senior Planner; Denise Spivey,
' Urban Planner; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Joe Morris,
Assistant City Attorney; Bob Hagemann, Fire Marshall;
Jerry Clerk, City Engineer; Aoorosh Olyai, Transporta-
tion Engineer; Ray Rumfield, Civil Engineer, and Debbie
Boydston, secretary
Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order.
I. MINUTES: It was moved by Ms. Cole, seconded by Mr. LaForte
and -unanimously carried (7.0) to approve the minutes of the
1 study session of March 6, 1985. It was moved by Mr. Sidor,
I approvedthby Mr. e minutesPearson thedregular unanimously
meeting carried
March 027, 1983.
If. CONSENT AGENDA: It was moved by Mr. Escue, seconded by
1 w ren, and unanimously carried (7-0) to approve the
consent agenda as follows:
A. Approval of preliminary plat of the Cedar Creek
Addition, Lots 1-16, Block 1.
B. Approval of final plat of the Creekside Addition,
Lot 1, Block 1.
C. Approval of final plat of the Garner Addition,
Lot 1, Block 1.
D. Recommend approval of preliminary'replat of the
JBC Addition, Lot 3A, Block 1.
E. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the
Naughton Place Addition, Lot 1, Hlock 1.
F. Approval of final Vat of the Sauls Addition,
Extension of Lots 7 and 8, Block 1.
G. Approval of final plat of the Sunburst Place Two
Addition.
H. Approval of final plat of the Westgate Heights Phase I
Addition.
111. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. rZ-1730. Petition of Ana Rocca Pena requesting a change
ipn zoningg from the aggricultural (A) classification to the
located along otheneast Oside sofiRiney Road,0adjacent rand
south of U.S. Highway 77, and north of Windsor Drive, at
a point beginning approximately 220 feet east of the in-
tersection of Riney Road and Windsor Drive. If approved,
the planned development will permit the following land
uses:
31 single family detached lots on 10.6 acres
with a density of 2.9 units per acre
(minimum 8,000 square foot lots)
An 80 unit retirement center on 3.S acres
with a density of 22.9 units per acre
P b 2 Minutes
April 10, 1585
Page 2
PETITIONER: Greg Edwards, representing the petitioner,
exp a n-the revised site plan and stated that th-y
have support of the neighborhood. He referred to staff's
recommendation stating that five conditions were sug-
gested by staff and five were suggested by engineer. He
r
had equested clarification on condition #3 stating that he
tional
tionalerightkofgway. Conditionn#4bstates dedicating ilots addi-
be a minimum of 8,000 square feet and they have noted on
the site plan that houses will be a minimum of 1,600
square feet. On question, he said that Riney Road will
curve to meet with Donna Road, right-of-way to be pro-
vided by developer.
IN FAVOR: Ron Arrington, 620 Northridge, stated he is
suppor ng request and appreciates the developer talking
with the neighborhood. He said he would like to see a
continuation of single family development in the area.
He asked those present in favor to stand.
OPPOSED: None present.
maAF- Tie3 to0property owners; said
reply 2forms notices
were were returned
in favor, none were returned in opposition, one was re-
r turned undecided. She continued that there have been
several requests made on this particular property, that
property is located in a low intensity area which areas
are intended for single family development with some
diversified land use. Access to the retirement recor
center is shown on the interior street and ade uate ery
ing is provided. The proposal complies with Development
Guide policies and intensity standard will not be
exceeded. Staff recommends approval with conditions.
On questions, she said that purpose of condition #9 is
to prohibit frame housing.
Mr. Clark suggested a cul-de-sac at the end of Riney
Road to prevent its intersection with Highway 77 so that
Highway 77 will not become another University Drive with
too many traffic lights. On question, he said developer
has indicated he would dedicate the 0.333 acre parcel to
the city for a cul-de-sac. On further question, he said
the city will participate in anything over 17 feet on a
collector street. He suggested clarifying condition 03.
REBUTTAL: Mr. Edwards said that Ms. Pena will be dedi-
cafing streets in memory of her father and her son. Ile
said they will trade not requiring improvements on Riney
Road if developer picks up cost for oversizing on newly
proposed Riney Road.
Ana Rocca Pena, owner of property, said that development
will be named Northridge Heights.
Public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Juren moved to recommend approval of
Z 777 subject to the following conditions:
I, the overall density level of the entire tract shall
not exceed 7.9 units per acre.
2. The retirement/recovery center shall be limited to
80 units.
3. The developer shall dedicate appropriate right-
of-way and provide necessary off-site street and
drainage improvements in accordance with City of
Denton requirements along half of Riney Road from
the southern terminus of the road to the beginning
of the proposed new alignment of Riney Road. The
P 6 Z Minutes
April 10, 1985
Page 3
developer will be required to pay total cost for
that section of Riney Road within development (no
city participation in oversizing).
4. All single family detached lots shall be a minimum
of 8,000 square feet in size.
5. A six foot solid wood fence shall be erected along
the southern boundary of the retirement/recovery
center tract.
6. Care of alcoholic or narcotic patients is pro-
hibited.
7. The use of the building designated as "retirement/
recovery center" on the concept plan will be
limited to providing lodging, meals, and nursing
care for ill or elderly persons only.
8. If the single family dwellings are two-story, no
windows on the second floor will face existing
developed property.
9. The single family dwellings and retirement center
shall be of masonry construction.
10. When the property is subdivided and developed,
drainage will not be allowed to flow across the
north line of the Dane property.
11. All dwellings shall be a minimum of 1,600 squate
feet in size.
12. Existing Riney Road shall become a cul-de-sac at
its northern terminus to prevent direct access onto
I Highway 77. Plans for installation of cul-de-sac
are required at time of platting. Actual cul-de-sac
must be installed when initial development occurs.
Seconded by Mr. LaPorte and unanimously carried (7-0).
If B. V-13. Petition of Charles Watkins requesting a variance
f oT Articles 4.03 and 4.07 of the City of Denton Sub-
division and Land Development Regulations requiring
r perimeter street paving and upgrading the existing
waterline across the frontage of the Hickman Addition.
This tract is 0.434 acres located south of May Street
and east of Ruddell Street. The tract is described as
Block A, Lot 1, of the Hickman Addition and shown in the
J. Brock Survey, Abstract SS. A single family building
is proposed.
PETITIONER: Charles Watkins, representing petitioner,
s a e owner is planning to move a single family dwelling
onto property, that May Street is a seal coat street and
has no curb and gutter, that street deadends at a Reme
and there is not much traffic on the street at the
present time. There is an existing 2 inch waterline.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that five notices were
mailed to adjacent property owners, no reply forms were
received in favor, one reply form was received in opposi-
tion. She continued that the Legal D partment has issued
an opinion stating that in no case shall a variance be
granted unless all of the following eight conditions, as
specified in Article 1, Chapter III of Appendix A of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, are met:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city
master plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result
in an extreme hardship for the development of the
subdivision.
r
DATE: May 14, 1985
CrTY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: C;iris Hartung, City Manager
SU BJt-CT: V-14 This is the petition of Ali Al-Khafaji requesting a
variance of Article 4.15 of the City of Denton Subdivision
and Land Development Regulations. The article details
RECOAM ENDATION drainage improvements.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the
variance be denied at their April 10, 1985 meeting by a
vote of 6 to 1.
St iARY: Mr. A1-Khafaji has requested a variance of drainage improve-
ments for the A1-Khafaji Addition on Duncan Street.
BACKGROUND: A Final Plat for the Al-Khafaji Addition was approved on
Nov. 14, 1984. Drainage improvements were discussed during
the plat review process, and Mr. Ai-Khafaji agreed to make
the improvements. The Bell Addition located east and adjacent
to the Al-Khafaji Addition was granted a variance of drain-
age improvements in March of 1985.
PROGRA.dS, DEPAVIENIS OR GROUPS AFFECTED.
If this variance is approved, the general public will be
required to pay for the improvements.
F iSCAL LIPA+.T:
Respectfully subia' tted:
,n t u
City '4anag~r
Prepared by:
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
Ap ov,
Jeff Me
Director of Planning and
Community Development
III
CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA
BACK-UP SUt4tARY SHEET
MEETING DATE! May 14, 1985
SUBJ UT: V-14. This is the petition of All A1-•knafaji requesting a
variance of Article 4.15 of the City of Denton Subdivision
and Land Development Regulations. The article detsils
drainage improvements.
SUMMARY. Variationa and modifications of the requirements of the
Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations are
discussed in Article it Chapter III and states in part that
in no case shall the commission or council grant
modifications unless it finds that all of the following
conditions are satisfied:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city master
plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result in an
extreme hardship for the development of the subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other land use in
{ the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent of
the standard.
S. The problem in question is not generally common to other
properties in the city. If the problem standard in
question is of general application to numerous
properties throughout the city, then the Planning and
Zoning Commission is prohibited from granting such
variance, but sh%~uld instead recoauuend an ordinance
change to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the property
shall be considered for modification of standards.
7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to the
property itself as distinguished from a hardship
relating to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or
proposed property owner's own actions.
If the City Council concludes that the eight conditions as
specified in the subdivision regulations are met, a majority
of affirmative votes is required to grant the variance.
A memorandum from Jerry Clark, City Engineer describing the
cost and effect of the improvements is attached.
ACTION REQUIREDt Approve or deny the request for variance.
10
Cc Backup Summary
V-14
Page 2
RECOKKbNDATION% The Planning and Zoning commission recommended that the
variance be denied at their April 10, 1985 meeting by a vote
of 6 to 1 and improvements be required.
P ALTERNATIVES: Approve or deny the request for variance
ATTACHMENT: Reduced plat
f
Cecile Carson
Urban Planner
I
f
11128
r \
'1041 ~t~
rn. CAO► ,
Lopica
[ N ll. a0 1 LOCATION
C
lr
I I ~ x000' s
Il
Y g
1 ~
~ 1.
W
.s pu MMi 7+Y'T ~
LOT I MOCK I sw.a. oAa! HDVS~..(a
k ~ COU[0 L,ONT INDUST,
A[AC UL LO+Y tONf I ~
I ti0W00MlOAY ~ ~ ~ ,;OMMf {C1AL
0 Q
00.. f~^ li SLWLS' IN LSMT !a0 /K! D[
i
, Ik ~ a ys
mst r wMrca-- LAS-"
8 a
(OMML0.CIAL wNp,
C,.A 4,L! L ~f
l I
17, k
' h.NrLT !OW 79MT 41 0 OL
Sj
1
f .
i
OWNM
C V~14 ALI AL• KAAFA-11
l 10.[IIMINAtV its E UuIYtRSITY DR,
paEAfTON, TX. 74?v1
AL.- KHAFAJI ADDITION
i LOT I
ICING 1.075 ACJtCy IN TNC
S.C. NIRAMS SURVEY A• 616
I CITY t COUNTY OI oCNTOM M"s
1
1
I a ioe
~ n 4° w
I
I
I
r'
P 6 2 Minutes
April 10, 1985
' Page S
C.~V 14. Petition of Ali Al-Khafaji requesting a variance
' 6TArticle 4.15 of the City of Denton Subdivision and
Land Development Regulations with respect to drainage -
requirements. This tract is 1.075 acres located on
the west side of Duncan Street between Smith Street and
Dallas Drive. The tract is described as Lot 1, Block 1,
of the A1-Khafaji Addition and shown in the S. C. Hirams
( Survey, Abstract 616. The property is toned commercial
{ (C).
f PETITIONER: Greg Edwards, representing the petitioner,
i state tat a plat has already been approved and they
are asking for a variance to make development more
I economically feasible. He said the property owner to
the north was granted a variance of drainage improve-
s ments. Mr. Edwards continued that the improvements
would be temporary in nature because of the need to
improve the drainsggke to the north of this property.
On question he platted, and they aaretnow trying etotutilitei the aiand.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that four notices were
M&IR d to property owners, no reply forms were received
in favor yr in opposition. She said that a plat was
thatoindMarch981985, Mr. Bell drainage She condition, con-
tinued that the Legal Department has issued an opinion
stating that in no case shall a variance be granted
unless all of the following eight conditions, as
► specified in Article 1, Chapter III o° Appendix A of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, are met:
M 1. The modified proposal would conform to the city
master plans.
hardship for the sdevelopmentresult the
Z in tan aextreme enforcement
subdivision.
3. Granting
preventing the modification orderly suwill not bdivision a of other effect
of land
use in the area.
r 4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent
of the standard.
S. The problem in question is not generally common
to other properties in the city. If the problem
standard in question is of general application to
numerous properties throughout the city, then the
Planning and Zoning Commission is prohibited from
granting such variance, but should instead recommend
an ordinance change to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the
property shall be considered for modification of
standards.
7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to
the property itself as distinguished from a hardship
relating to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or
proposed property owner's own actions.
` She said that seven of the eight conditions of variance
approval have not been satisfied; therefore, Development
Review Committee recommends denial.
Mr. Clark stated that since a variance was granted on
the Bell Addition, this developer felt he should not
be required to build improvements either. He said
Mr. Bell's property was different as it is a lot of
record and a redevelopment or exi)ansion of an existing
P 6 Z Minutes
April 10, 1985
Page 6
use -.vs proposed. Subject property was subdivided out
of a larger tract specifically for original development
purposes. He said flooding could occur if variance is
grantei. Mr. Clark further stated that this is an un-
usual request in that plat and plans for improvements
have already been approved and Mr. Khafaji decided that
he could not do improvements from a cost standpoint after
a drainage variance was granted for the Bell Addition.
REBUTTAL: Ali A1-Khafaji stated he had owned the
` propertyp for about 10 years. He added that he would
donate 45 eet of his property to Denton for an easement.
Public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Juren moved to den V-14. Seconded by
rFT ;'Pearson. Motion carried (6-1~. Mr. Claiborne voted
1 D. V-15. Petition of J. P. Haygood requesting a variance
r off-Articles 4.03 and 4.15 of the City of Denton Subdi-
vision and Land Development Regulations requiring per-
imeter street and drainage improvements. This tract is
10.00 acres located at the northwest corner of Bonnie
f Brae Street and Payne Drive. The tract is described as
Block 1, Lot 1, of the Life Tabernacle Addition and
shown in the Francis Batson Survey, Abstract 43. The
' property is zoned agricultural (A) and the development
of a church is anticipated.
PETITIONER: Paul Haygood, pastor of Life Tabernacle
urLFi cF: an3 representing the church, stated that the city
has said the church can have a curb cut on Bonnie Brae
C but not on Payne so they won't be putting any cars on
r Payne Drive. Bonnie Brae is covered under capital im-
provement program, they would like a variance on Payne.
They are requesting a varianca of drainage of floodway
as it goes under Payne Drive.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson said that four notices were
mailed to adjacent property owners, none were received
in favor or in opposition. She continued that the Legal
Department has issued an opinion stating that in no case
shalt a variance be granted unless all of the following
eight conditions, as specified in Article I, Chapter III
of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, are met:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city
master plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result
in an extreme hardship for the development of the
subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect
of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land
use in the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent
of the standard.
5. The problem in question is not generally common
to other properties in the city. If the problem
standard in question is of general application to
numerous properties throughout the city, then the
Planning and Zoning Commission is prohibited froLa
granting such variance, but ,.hould instead recommend
an ordinance change to the City Council.
DATE: May 14, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 9
F
r TO: Mayor and Members of this City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: V-15. This is the petition of J. P. Haygood requesting a variance
of Articles 4.03 and 4.15 of the City of Denton Subdivision and
Land Development Regulations. The articles detail requirements
for perimeter street paving and drainage improvements.
i
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the 3riance be
denied at their April 10, 1985 meeting by a vote of 4 SUMMARY- Mr. Haygood has requested a variance of drainage improvements
and a variance of perimeter street paving on Payne Drive and
Bonnie Brae Street.
BACKGROUND: The Development Review Committee and the Engineering Department
reviewed the variance request and concluded that the improvements
should be made.
j
,I
i
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: if the variance
improvements.
` the general public will be required to pay for f FISCAL IMPACT:
Respectful y subm led',
~hr s artung
C '
City Manager
Prepared by:
(AO* 4
Cecile Carebn
Urban Planner
APP ve~•
e ey-
Director of Planning
and Community Development
R
I
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SBERT
MEETING DATE: Kay 140 1985
1 .
SUBJECT: V-15. This is the petition of J. P. Baygood requesting a
variance of Articles 4.03 and 4.15 of the City of Denton
1 Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The articles
detail requirements for perimeter street paving and drainage
improvements.
i
SUMMARY: Vartationt and modifications of the requirements of the
Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations are
discussed in Article I, Chapter III and states in part that
in no case shall the commission or council grant
f modifications unless it finds that ate, of the following
conditions are satisfied:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city master
plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result in an
' extreme hardship for the development of the subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect of
preventing the orderly subdivision of other land use in
the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent of
the standard.
5. The problem in question is not generally common to other
properties in the city. If the problem standard in
question is of general application to numerous
properties throughout the city, then the Planning and
Zoning Commission is prohibited from granting such
variance, but should instead recommend an ordinance
change to the City Council.
6. The actual pecuniary cost of development of the property
shall be considered for modification of standards.
7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to the
property itself as distinguished from a hardship
relating to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applicant's or
proposed property owner's own actions.
I
If the City Council concludes that the eight conditions as
specified in the subdivision regulations are met, a majority
of affirmative votes is required to grant the variance.
1
A memorandum from Jerry Clark, City Engineer describing the
cost and effect of the improvements is attached.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approve or deny the request for variance.
RECOKKENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission recommended that the
variance be denied at their April 10, 1985 meeting by a vote
of 4 to 3 and improvements be required.
10
CC eackup Summary
V-15
Page 2
ALTERNATIVESs Approve or deny the request for variance
ATTACHMENTS1 1. Reduced plat
2. Memorandum from Jerry Clark, City Engineer
Cecile Carson
f Urban Planner
I
f
i
f
11128
I
a +ov >m-
1 44'V r
s a] t
9A6'
Wag
"iw ...r
f d ~73ii -
mob
E r ! ~ w
r
Lr NN:N~ Q{6
30
S~~"' ~ _ - J• ::J:: 1 :G~ '•'A Yid ~~~R~~pQ
vA
:.2 ale .t _ a~
2i t;
a SG ~ :a~ 3 y 1 ~I~. 1G ~2~
03
ya:} :.,3i 2~
r~
C/TYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8,
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: April 4, 1985
TO: Cecile Carson, Urban Planner
FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer
RE: V-15
i
The variance request on the Life Tabernacle Addition violates
most of the eight requirements for granting a variance.
1. City master plans call for Bonnie Brae and Payne to be
improved to major arterial and collector size. Drainage
improvements as shown by the Master Plan cross Payne.
Therefore, the variance .for the lot which includes a
floodway across its southwest corner is not advised.
2. For a ten acre tract in a choice location, the development
costs do not seem to be excessive. Due to its critical
location, releasing this tract from right-of-way, pavement,
and drainage improvements could place undue monetary
requirements on the City of Denton, basically allowing
almost free development of this lot for the church.
3. Flooding that will occur on Payne Drive from the culverts
not being properly sized will hinder development in the
area. Due to the amount of frontage this ten acre tract
has at a critical intersection, the pavement will also
restrict development until the Bonnie Brae project is
completed in the bond issue.
4. No alternatives are being suggested, the developer is
flatly requesting complete waiver from all costs.
5. The problem is common to a large number of tracts in the
city. If perimeter street paving is not going to be
enforced, it should be removed from the ordinances for all
developers.
Ai&
agE 2 pages
6. This is a judgement the developer should make. A 1.5
million dollar church shows that the development is not
tiny in its stature.
7. The convience of the reduced development coats seems to be .
the main purpose.
8. This is difficult to pinpoint so no judgement will be made.
Jerrr~~rC r P.E.
CitylTWj ry er
#0285E
i
3
E
i
I
1
I
i
i
1
w
S
P tr~inutes
April 10. 1985
Page 6
use was proposed. Sub ect property was subdivided out
of a larger tract specifically for original development
• purposes. Fie said flooding could occur if variance is
granted. Mr. Clark further stated that this is an un-
usual request in that plat and plans for improvements
have already been approved and Mr. lhafaji decided that
a .
edrcould not do ainage variance rwasmgranted ofor the t BellnAddition
REBUTTAL: Ali A1-lchafaji stated he had owned the
45 property of o his about property to years Denton added for an that he
easement. 'd . He Public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Juren moved to deny V-14. Seconded by
Wr-. Peaarson. Motion carried (6-1), Mr. Claibotut vote
no.
D. V-15. Petition of J. P. Haygood requesting a variance
of-Articles 4.03 and 4.15 of the City of Denton Subdi-
vision and Land OevelopTent Regulations requiring per-
imeter street and dra►s.dge improvements. This tract is
4 10.00 acres located at the northwest corner of Bonnie
Broe Street and Payne Drive. The tract is described as
Block 1, Lot 1, of the Life Tabernacle Addition and
shown in the Francis Batson Survey, Abstract 43. The
property is zoned agricultural (A) and the development
of a church is anticipated.
PETITIONER: Paul Haygood, pastor of Life Tabernacle
urc an representing the church, stated that the city
has said the church can have a curb cut on Bonnie Brae
but not on Payne so they won't be putting any cars on
Payne Drive. Bonnie Brae is covered under capital im-
provement program, they would like a variance on Payne.
They are requesting a variance of drainage of floodway
as it goes under Payne Drive.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson said that nfour one notices veered
m e o adjacent property owners, wexe receive
in favor or in opposition. She continued that the Legal
Department has issued an opinion stating that in no case
shall a variance be granted unless all of thehoalCowi4Il
, Q
eight conditions, as specified In Article I C
of Appendix A of the Code of ordinances of the City of
Denton, are met:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city
master plans. vision would result
2. Literal enforcement of a pro
in an extreme hardship for the development of the
subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect
of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land
use in the area.
4. The modification accomplishes the spirit and intent
of the standard,
S. The problem in gtestion is not generally pcomooft
roblem
to other properties in the city. If
standaii In question is of gendral 8Ppllcation to
numerou5. properties throughout the city, then the
Planning W Zoning Commission is prohibited from
an a ordinance such change n to , the but City should Counciie8d 'eeommend
P b' Ainutes
April 10, 1985
Page 7
6. The actual pecuniarv cost of development of the
property shall be considered for modification of
standards.
7. The hardship must be a physical hardship relating to
the property itself as distinguished from a hardship
relating to convenience.
8. The hardship must not result from the applkcant's or
proposed property owner's own actions
She said the first seven or the eight requirements are
not met, Development Review Committee feels that lmpreva-
ments must be made and recommends denial.
Mr. Clark stated that the master plan calls for Bonnie
Brae and Payne to be improved to major arterial and
collector size. He further stated that drainage im-
provements as shown by the master plan cross Payne
Drive; therefore, a variance for the lot which includes
a fioodway across its southwest corner is not advisable.
Mr. Ellison stated the subdivision regulations were
adopted in 1985 and the regulations reau+re that a lot
be platted before a building permit may be issued.
REBUTTAL: None.
Public hearing closed.
DECISION: Mr. Sidor moved to deny V-1S. Seconded by
meson and carried (4-3). Messrs. Escue, Juren
and LaForte voted no.
E. V-16. Petition of Charles Watkins requesting a variance
UT-The City of Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations requiring an extension of a waterline to the
Blackford Addition. The tract is 0.494 acres located
west of Fort North Drive between 1-3SE and Acme Street
and shown in the Alexander Hill Survey, Abstract 623.
The property is zoned commercial (C) end a commercial
development is anticipated.
PETITIONER: Charles Watkins, representing petitioner,
state that a single family house exists on each lot,
theyy are planning a $30,000 renovation to build a
barbeque restaurant. The .ost to extend a waterline
north of I-35 south along fort Worth Drive would be
approximately $89,000.
IN FAVOR: None present.
OPPOSED: None present.
STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that four notices were
mailed to adjacent property owners, no reply forms were
received in favor or in opposition. She continued that
the Legal Department his issued an opinion stating that
in no use shall a variance be granted unless all of the
following eight conditions, as specified in Article 1,
Chapter Iii of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, are met:
1. The modified proposal would conform to the city
master plans.
2. Literal enforcement of a provision would result
in an extreme hardship for the development of the
subdivision.
3. Granting of a modification will not have the effect
of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land
use in the area.
DATE: 05/14/85
CITY COUNCIL RKPORT FORMAT
q, D
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM. C. Chtie Hartung, City Manager
EUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PETITION OF HAMMETT & NAM INC.
FOR ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 361.708 ACRES SITUATED IN 114 H. KAY
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 807 AND THE V.E. GAILOR SURVEY, ABSTRACT A52 AND
BEGINNING WEST OF FM ?164 (N. LOCUST) AP7EOXtKATELY 7,000 FEET NORTH
OF HERCULES LANE (A-16).
• RECOMMENDAYTON:
The Planning and Zoning commission will melee its recommendation on
may 8, 1985.
SUMMARY'
This is a voluntary annexation petition.
BACKGROUND:
Not applicable.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
There tee no existing structures or residences.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined
7pesubm t d:
too
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Pre ceded by- I
David Ellison
Senior Pla--rw
Appro d:
Jeff Meye
Director of Planning
and Community Development
11838
Er.
r
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: May 14, 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing concerning the petition
for annexation of HammQtt & Nash, Inc. for
approximately 361.708 acres situated in the H.
May Survey, Abstract 807 and the Z. E. Gailor
Survey, Abstract 452 and beginning west of FM
2164 (North Locust) approximately 7,000 feet
north of Hercules Lane (A-16).
t ! SUMMARY: This is a voluntary annexation petition. A
change in zoning request is anticipated. This
site is located approximately 2,000 to 3,000
feet north and east of the Texas Instrument
tract. Limitad public facilities are available
in the area of utilities. North Locust or FM
t 2164 is maintained by the State.
A Pre-design Conference was held by the
Development Review Committee on January 15,
` 1985, to consider possible light industrial (LI)
zoning oa this parcel. This site is located in
a low intensity area and comments of the
Development Review Committee are attached fnr
informatiin.
1
ACTION REQUIRED: Hold a public hearing, no action required to
continue process.
h PROGRAMS,
DEPARTMENTS, OR
GROUPS AFFECTED: No existing structures or residents are ffected
FISCAL IMPACT: If annexed prior to development, no City
services will have to be provided.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Review Committee minutes of
January 15, 1985
2. Map
I1 3. Service plan
I
AATY~
11658 (1)
David Ellison, Senior Planner
Minutes
Development Review Committee
January 15, 1985
DRC Memberr• Present: Harlan Jefferson, Don McLaughlin, Robert
Hageman, David Ellison, Harry Persaud, David
Salmon, Robbie Baughman and Ray Rumfield.
Engineer, Planner,
Architect, Surveyor,
or other development
I interests present: James Cozby, Bill Nash
XIX. Review of Proposed Annexation and Light Industrial zoning
383.758 Acre Tract in the H. May Survey Abstract 807 and the
V. E. Gailor Survey Abstract 452
r A. Engineering
1. Seems to have some small drainage channels running
through tract including some ponds.
2. Since tract is proposed light industrial we strongly
recommend that detention be used to handle the large
amount of runoff.
3. This area beyond the boundaries of our thoroughfare
plan. Since its proposed use is light industrial and
near proposed Loop 288 some collector streets will be
required if approved. Requirements for an arterial
will be discussed when more information is provided.
4. No further comments due to lack of information.
B. Transportation Engineering
1. Adequate right-of-way on Locust will be required at
time of zoning and/or platting.
2. No comment. on annexation.
C. Water and Sewer
1. Nearest water line is 4,500' south on Locust (F.M.
2164) at Hercules at well. May not be enough fire
flow (3,000 g.p.m. required).
2. Nearest sanitary sewer is at Seline and Stuart Road.
Approximately 3,000' south and 3,000' east of
property. A 10" sewer at this point runs down to
Cooper Creek outfall. Study is required to see if
this 10" sewer system has capacity to accomodate
proposed zoning and/or development.
Minutes
Development Review Committee
V. E. Gailor Survey
January 15, 1985
Page 2
C. Water and Sewer (Continued)
3. No pro rata charges required.
4. Pro rata agreement may be had.
5. Oversize agreement required.
6. Outside city limits approval not required if annexed.
D. Electric
Dual service area with Denton County Electric Cooperative
electric service from the City of Denton could be arranged
at customer request. Service would be per Commercial/
Industrial P.egulations.
E. Fire
1. Fire hydrants required every 300 feet.
2. Mast provide an all weather driving surface on not
less than 20 feet of unobstructed width, wif-h ade-
quate roadway turning radius capableYefconatruting the
imposed loads of fire apparatus
begins.
30 Fire hydrants and water system must be operational
before construction begins.
4. The access roadway shall be extended to within 150
feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the
first story of any building.
5. Uniform Fire Code, 1982, is applicable.
6. All the above comments are to be effective if proposed
zoning and annexation are passe4 (app
F. Building Inspection
No comments at this time.
G. Lone Star Gas
No comments at this tire.
H. G.T.E.
No representative was present.
Minutes
Dsvelopment Review Committee
V. E. Gailor Survey
January 15, 1985
Page 3
I. Cox Cable
J. Solid Waste
Service not available, because the development is outside
of the city limits. Service will be provided if annexed.
K. Parks and Recreation
No representaEive was present.
L. Planning and Community Development
1. This site is located in a low intensity area and staff
would strongly oppose light industrial zoning. The
current Development Guide policies on which staff
k bases its recommendations call for predominantly low
r density residential land use emphasis. Limited high
I intensity uses such as commercial/retail/neighborhood
service to office may be permitted up to 6 atces total
within 1/2 mile distance or half the length of
intensity area study boundaries.
` 2. If there is an active interest in high intensity
f development and zoning in this area, staff r=commends
that the owners or development interest formally
r request that the Development Guide policies and low
intensity designation for this area be changed to a
high intensity area. Staff will not support such a
proposal from a recommendation standpoint, but will
assist in processing request so the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council can make a decision.
3. The Development Review planning section is also
available for consultation if a formal change in
zoning petition is submitted regardless of the nature
of the request. Staff is also available for more
detailed discussion of Development Guide policies and
the implementation process.
.r w +r'
- ~i4TZ I~`
!L r
Ir ~ j~l~ : 11 ~ i•lyS 3f ~ .N
} 1 '
!
~ Jw•'
r
I
1 _
f
T -
1
I/
PLAIT OF SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON,_ TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amended requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
area which is bounded as shown on a map of the proposed annexation.
r
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTOW, TEXAS:
~P Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
R
A. Police
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signals, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
r B. Fire
f (1) Fire protection by the present personnel and equip-
ment of the fire fighting force, will be provided
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestic, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
' (1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the cod; of the City of Denton, 'texas.
t
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
E date of annexation.
r
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
F. Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective date of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
present city, will begin in the annexed area on
the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation,
H. Planning and Zoning
t (1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
` will extend to the annexed area on the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will be installed in the substao-
tially developed areas in accordance with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) Residents of the annexed area may use all existing
recreational facilities, parks, etc., on the effec-
tiie date of annexation. The same standards and
policies now used in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power,
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page three
L. Miscellaneous
{1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately 6 months after the effective
date of annexation.
II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
•
The CIP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
k based partly on density of population, magnitude
I of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
f natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
(2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
annexation area will be judged accordingly to the same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
f
f '
k
r
I
f
r
11`
I
`7
1 DATE: 05/14/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
t
r 91~78
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PETITION OF HAMMETT rX NASH, INC.
FOR A TRACT APPROXIMATELY 180.9855 ACRES IN SIZE SITUATED IN THE
r JOHN A. BURNS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 130 AND THE THOMAS POLK SURVEY,
I[ ABSTRACT 999 AND BEGINNING WEST OF FM 2164 (N. LOCUST) APPROXIMATELY
9,000 FEET NORTH OF HERCULES LANE (:.-19).
I
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission will make its recommendation on
may 8, 1985.
' SUMMARY:
{ This is a voluntary annexation petition.
BACKGROUND:
I ;
Not applicable.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFWTED:
One residence with an undetermined number of occupants is within the
affected area.
r
FISCAL IMPACT:
I Undetermined
i
Respect] Dmi
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Pre aced by:
l _
David Ellison _
Senior Planner
Appro ed:
Jeff Meyer,
Director of Planning
and Community Development
1184&
I
I
I
i
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SUMMARY SHFET
MEETING DATE: May 14, 1985
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing regarding the annexation
petition of Hammett 6 Nash, Inc. for a tract
approximately 180.9855 acres in size situated in
the John A. Burns Survey, Abstract 130 and the
Thomas Polk survey, Abstract 999 and beginning
west of FM 2164 (North Locust) approximately
9,000 feet north of H,,rcules Lane (A-19).
SUMMARY: This petition is similar to A-16 in that no
immediate development is anticipated. A change
in zoning request has been filed and will be
considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission
at a future date. One residence with an
undetermined number of occupants is within the
area proposed for annexation. The owners have
indicated that the residence will be vacated by
the time of final annexation action, however, if
occupied after-annexation, basic City services
must be provided (fire protection, police
protection, sanitation service, etc.) if the
tract is annexed.
ACTION REQUIRED: Hold i public hearing, no action required to
continue process.
FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Map i
'L. Service Plan
JCM/0 XY~ ~
David Ellison
Senior Planner
11658 (2)
ow
+ W.A. VI` 1 S r J
.r:
J •
3 - ' . .rte--~--.:• - ~ _
r.:y::'r:•.{;?.};ti '{'~Cti:.. •iJ ~'r,:;:jiS:{.1~C••;}::' 1 i'~w.
?:.•7)I `:.v.': .:err::;[::~::. ~ , 1:
}iii i}11~$w\•~ '
~V
I
1
t• tw.ro
PLAN 01' SERVICE FOR ANNEXED AREA, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Article 970a as amend.?d requires that a plan of service
be adopted by the governing body of a city prior to passage of an ordinance
annexing an area; and
!WHEREAS, the City of Denton is contemplating annexation of an
i area which is bounded as shown on a map oi' the proposed annexation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF DENTON, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 970a as
amended, Texas Code Annotated, there is hereby adopted for the proposed
annexation area the following plan of service:
I. Basic Service Plan
A. Police
I
(1) Patrolling, radio responses to calls, and other
routine police services, using present personnel
and equipment, will be provided on the effective
i date of annexation;
(2) Traffic signe.ls, traffic signs, street markings,
and other traffic control devices will be installed
as the need therefore is established by appropriate
study and traffic standards.
B. Fire
(1) Fire protection by the present
merit of the fire fighting force, will be and equip-
meat
on the effective date of annexation.
C. Water
(1) Water for domestte, commercial and industrial use
will be provided at city rates, from existing city
lines on the effective date of annexation, and
thereafter from new lines as extended in accordance
with article 4.09 of appendix A of the code of the
City of Denton, Texas.
D. Sewer
(1) Properties in the annexed areas will be connected
to sewer lines in accordance with article 4.09 of
appendix A of the code of the City of Denton, Texas.
E. Refuse Collection
(1) The same regular refuse collection service now pro-
vided within the city will be extended to the
annexed area within one month after the effective
date of annexation.
r
k
Service Plan
Annexed Areas
Page two
r.
F, Streets
(1) Emergency maintenance of streets (repair of hazardous
( chuckholes, measures necessary for traffic flow, etc.)
will begin on the effective data of annexation.
(2) Routine maintenance on the same basis as in the
( present city, will begin in the annexed area on
M the effective date of annexation.
(3) Reconstruction and resurfacing of streets, installa-
tion of storm drainage facilities, construction of
curbs and gutters, and other such major improvements,
as the need therefore is determined by the governing
body, will be accomplished under the established
policies of the city.
G. Inspection Services
(1) Any inspection services now provided by the city
(building, electrical, plumbing, gas, housing,
sanitation, etc.) will begin in the annexation area
on the effective date of annexation.
H. Planning and Zoning
(1) The Planning and Zoning jurisdiction of the city
will extend to the annexed area or, the effective
date of annexation. City planning will thereafter
encompass the annexed area.
I. Street Lighting
(1) Street lighting will ba installed in the substan-
tially developed areas in accord&nce with the
established policies of the city.
J. Recreation
(1) rResidents of the ecreational facilities,4 parea may arks, etc., on all
the existing dale of annexation. The same standards and
policies now usea in the present city will be fol-
lowed in expanding the recreational program and
facilities in the enlarged city.
K. Electric Distribution
(1) The city recommends the use of City of Denton for
electric power.
r'
Service Plan
R Annexed Areas
Page three
i
r
L. Miscellaneous
(1) Street name signs where needed will be installed
within approximately G months after the effective
` date of annexation.
( II. Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
I
The CiP of the City consists of a five year plan that is up-
dated yearly. The Plan is prioritized by such policy guide-
lines as:
(1) Demand for services as compared to other areas
based partly on density of population, magnitude
of problems compared to other areas, established
technical standards and professional studies, and
natural or technical restraints or opportunities.
I (2) Impact on the balanced growth policy of the city.
(3) Impact on overall city economics.
The annexed area will be considered for CIP planning in the
upcoming CIP plan, which will be no longer than one year from
L the date of annexation. In this new CIP planning year the
r annexation area will be judged accordingly to tht, same
established criteria as all other areas of the city.
1
0890L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials,
equipment supplies or services in accordance with the procedures
of state {aw and City ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
reviewed and recommended that the herein descr.bed bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or
services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for
the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the
materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted
herein; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materials equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid
Proposals?' attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
9431A All Business Essentials $ 53,484.00
9441 1,3,4,14, Poleline Electric $ 68,581.00
a1~" nTTF
9441 2 8 6 G.E. Supply $ 30,343.00
4441 _ 5.7.8.9 Cummins Supply $ 108,698.0L
and 13
3$ 31.9 5.00
444,1., ___K b Alamo Transformer
9441 11 Ousenbarre $ 15.9l0,no
9442 1 Aardvark Trailers $ 7.380.00
x9442 2witch Eouipment $ 10.025.00
9442 _3 Witch Equipment $ 7.075.00
9443 1 Lone Star Paterbilt $ 62.663.00 _
9443 2 DAvis Truck & Equipment 30,200.00
PAGE 1
II
r'
CONTINUATION SECTION I.
DID NUMBER ITEM NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
` _99.44___ _ -ALL- moors. l _ _ $32,290.00
- 9466 - All .-consolidated Traffic _ _$16,284.00
944$_ _ __A1l We_ staate Heights-Part. $ 5,931.80
9449 214 & 5 Wesco $41,152.00
I' 9449 1,3 & 6 Poleline $21,193.00
9449 7 Cummins $ 5,590.00
9449 8 Temple $ 69845.00
9451 All Advance Control Systems $21,300.00
9452 A11 _ Temple $ 6.409.29
_ 9455 1,2,5,6,Atlas Utility Supply $18,160.00
9 & 10
9455 3- 4,11 & 12 Industrial International $149065.00
9455 13 & 14 - Trans Tex Supply $ 6,230.00
r 9455 8 Ferguson Universal $ 99900.00
9456 All T&T Body Shop 4.625.00
i` 9458 A]1 _ _Sherman & Reilly ~24.75B.D0
I
I
f
I
I
SECTION II.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such icams and agrees to purchase
standards services
quantities ac and d~ for with
the mCe rms, specif suppiies or
the the
specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals,
and related documents.
SECTION 111.
I• That should the City and persons submitting approved and
` accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
if formal written agreeme:,t as a result of the acceptance, approval,
and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated
' representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract
which shall be attached hereto; provided that the written contract
specified sums contained specifications,
in the Bid
is in quantities t and the
standards, , q q
Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes the
to to ewritten contract cmade apursuant
the approved bids or therefor
thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effeltive immediately +
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1985.
RURM,
CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHmOTTE ALLEN, CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DEN'ZON, TEXAS
BY:
PACE 2
DATE: 5-14-85
F CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 49431A MODULAR FURNITURE PANELS
L
RECOMMENDATION: he recommend this bid be awarded to the loweat evaluated bid
received. The bid received from Business Essentials of Denton,
bidding Aspects brand, for the low total of $53.484.00. This
is some $1,500.00 lower than Goldsmith's bidding the Rosemont.
SUMMARY: This bid was sent out before as presented by the consultant.
As before, we received only one bid. The bid was rejected
and rebid with specification revised. We received nine
qualified bids, and generally all meeting the intent of the
specifications.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTF..D:
Remodelling Phase III Main Section of Municipal Building
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respectfully submitted,
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Z" a ZOV
Name: \ Marshall, C.P.M.
Tvtle: urchasing Agent
r Approved:
n . Marshall, C.P.M.
/ tl;: Purchasing Agent
` Y fn1 M d 4
H C 2 ~
z
E H
fF 3
v PC
C1
n o
b
H
Z
N e
1 N N
~kf1 m
r
A N
V O
V 70
S
R1
W x K
r
~ O
7 W
A +~pC7
- fpm~p 7V ~1 N_
70 2
q 0CA
7A d A /J N N
e+ = V 0~ m
A N l*1 pp CO
c CP, Cf 0
N O • N
07
ON tA 0 vi
p m a. r n
c z w ~ m-+
d V
W
N
N In
rr
W T
9 N
$ Zr ma
I -
N V
0 -M
rc
b I"
~ G Z r~r Ff
W
A i {AJI SO rn :O
A d
N V
on 0
s
N ~ W =
'SA
W
z
g
-T--Tfli I
DATE: 5-14-85
r
r CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 09441 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest evaluated
bidders for each item:
I,
Item 1,3,4,14,15, & 16 Poleline Electric Total Award $ 68,581.00
i Item 2 and 6 G.E. Supply Total Award $ 30,343.00
Item 5,7,8,9, and 13 Cummins Supply Total Award $108,698.00
Item 10 and 12 Alamo Transformer Total Award $ 31,935.00
Item 11 Dusenberry Total Award $ 15,940.00
Total Bid $255,497.00
The evaluation of these transformers is based on total cost of
operation over a life expectancy of the unit. It takes into
consideration the cost of electricity to operate the unit as
j well as the amount of watts required.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Distribution Department, Maintenance and New Construction
for the Electric Distribution System
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Account 16I1-00E-0252-9222
Capital Expenditure-Line Transformers
Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: om 4aj
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
(A 501,
Name o rs a , i.
Ti : u ha sing Agent
O~ A W N r O 1D O V O~ U+ A W N r n 0 HW H
o z v v
N N W Vi N tT O S N n.. N C yy
N N V+ O W O O ~7 y
a
V «
O S O O V O to O VNL O r O N O tr D p ~D
7[ 7C TC 7C 7C 7C 7C x 7i 7c lC 7c 7C 7C 7C 7C H w ~ A
b ➢ D ➢ ➢ p D ➢ A ➢ ➢ b ➢ I+ b D M R
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 'a ro ~ n n n n n 3
s x s a x x x a a 3 H N N N o o
_ ro ro ro ro 7 a
O O O O O O O O M
N n y O
n
O Z
N r~v+ rry Nr N N N N N N r+ w N Nt O N O
O ~ ~ O O
~ • p H
A N N N r r`+ r r. \ \
co O O O N N N N co A A J* A A A N
O co tD W O O O • O C O O O O O O r-j
Z
3 x
m
a al to b N r LA rm -0
~4 Cc -0 m
A uai v - +
pp P m N to ONt7 N O O V N try
1D W6 m O~ iJ~ O N ~O O Nn w 10 O. N. N r
8 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 F 8 g c4i ` gy m
N r ~r r y y..
n+ b 0O W a N v co +vN O m
A A 00 O~ V w O+ V O O~ ~D W S
S S 8 8 S 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 a
7D
Y Nt A N r r r u
{rt~~1 {tf~ r V V 00 A N ~Op app {N.~~ ~p p~ V 1,n n
N O O r+ crk O O N M Nt N
(D ~D V r w W N V ~D O~ m
8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 8 8
r r ~r r r
N~ A r r C
S A tpp O' V ppVpp A N O O N N %D P V m
W V O W r C:1 V W 9 14 N to Ni v y
p~ a 1. W yr~ pry Ar r
8 8 ttr O O S vii O $ Q O O O O O K
GO V to A N pO
N 60
pp~f tW7t v+ ►A+ pry rte. pp i
W Np AO C1D 00 Vpt ~r+ ~Oj C. pA y
S O C7 S O O O S $
~~p tA~ t7t W N pry r r f. p..
r- rn
tT O W N A' O V 0o co W tAL` INS'. V 'J' a m r
pp N V O {N N ON V Y A Oi dV ~D m N b 2
O ul O tYi~ vii p tW Y
vW a
+ vi cm O LA `t5 C A i O C'f
r r r r C1 IA ro
N A N V + tT N o m A + W 0 V Ni 0 7 A
w
V t0 ~C OD O N W OD 10 O 8 0 r N V W 7.
pO~t pC pr tpC O pV Opp V tp7t O ~j #u" N A ON O K 0 r- 0
O O C O O O O S O S O S S O O '~O ~}~p'~'
M- 17- lp-
+p~ r N O r N + p + + O
W D1 b 'AO N OD N VD G O NT V N
WD O Z ro n
VI A ~ P N W N A Y O O A V t9 01 W ~f,
0 8 8 8 S 8 S S S 8 8 3 8 o E"
V V
404 W N N W r r r r r, m C
+ +
to w O p V A O~ co z A M Y
~O AA W W r O O A NO A 0 V ro n
O~ O~ tD W b Ni O~ W W CO tr O $ -I -i
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g 8 8 8 8 8 8 S~
A a to W N r r r ~
O8 H n
vl W i. N + M V a r V er O~ A y Cy
+ Y W A tj O 00 N b A m O W tF V Z 'O 3
A r•+ A W V r A . li, W tT W O O A.
r
8 8$ 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 S 0 8 8 8 g `m
A ~ g z s
' $ U g g FS
wmmw~
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID +9442 TRAILERS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting
specification for each item:
Item 1 to Aardvark Trailers in the amount of $7$80.00 including electric brakes
Item 2 to Witch Equipment in the amount of $109025.00 including brakes L installation
Item 3 to Witch Equipment in the amount of $7,075.00 including brkes & installation
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of equipment trailers for the
Parks Department, Water and Sewer Department, and Electric
Distribution Department. These trailers will be used to
haul mowers, backhoes, and other equipment.
P
SACKGRDUND: Tabulation Sheet
I` PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Parks Department, Water A Sewer Department,
Electric Distribution and Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: Item 1 is a lease/purchase.
Item 2 8 3 are purchases from 1984-85 budg:st funds.
Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
z~• . ,
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing AGent
Approved:
r. 6 *A~ 1
Na Jo arshall, C.P.M.
T e: rchasing Agent
A W N ~ n b H H
n M d G
M
r+ r+ f f 1 C+ r+
N fD fp 0~i d ~ A ~D
S S 1
n C Q0 A
< N W N C7 00 Vi
ro h ♦1 W VI M
0 0
n
N
r+ ° O CD n
J J
H
r+ 3c
S m Z
~ rt
N r-F
C ~
J J.
J.
n
f
►r n
N N p N N
L< f _n O V1 O Vl co p r~
N O O O O LA pr,
O
IY N v r+ co
'rl vN
Z 4Z O
w a-+ rn
d r') A Z V. W 0-4
w o x
o ~
co m .
(.n C> io
0 0 ►~m
CD "a ;o
ran (A
I o ~b qm
! rn
m r-
' 14 wo
C v v
CD 0
N
1+ h rm 3c
7, ►g. h_
S h1
M
L
x
g
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 4q443 FRONT LOAD REFUSE TRUCK
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid ba awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specifications:
Item 1 Lone Star Peterbilt ;62,663.00
Item 2 Davis Truck b Equipment $30,200.00
Total Bid 3929863.00
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of a front loading refuse truck.
We are recommending the purchase of a Peterbilt truck and a
Pak-Mor body. Delivery will be in 40 days after receipt of
order.
The bid of Tarrant Systems is for a 1984 Demo truck and has a
standard transmission. We bid a 1985 truck with automatic
transmission.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Solid Waste Collection and Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: This unit will be funded thru a lease/purchase agreement between
MBank Capital Fudning and City of Denton. The APR is 9.10% for
a 36 month payout schedule.
Respectfully submitted:
G.Thrl s Hartung
City Manager
P ared by:
llz~ 2 0 A--Q
Name: Tom Shaw,
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved: '9 Na, AiingrA s a T e:gent
w v
n b H ~
r, a ~ 0 0
L a
• 2 ~ •y A 7~~1 b
4 < $ ~ o
I
z a
f ~ c ~k
I'
Y a
~ a
a ~ W ro C
a °
Or pA sp+ ppw V1
N O O O
~ ~n--
1 N N
f I O W N
V p
~ { O
N 1 d V
[~1 ~ u
~ 8 ~ 8 y8~
r Coo p '
' v„
N O tN71 mf1
O A+ ~ N ~Vp yVy ~y. N
~ ~ A O A S ~ 1'f
~ 8 8 S ~
y
N
OO D Cg
6 ~ ~ QQ~ X70 R1
N ~ W V bD
r ~L7 r
^ 8 ~
G
rb
V
10
r
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
i
pr
F TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9444 FLAIL MOWER AND TRACTOR COMBINATION
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting
` specification of Tractors, Incorporated, of Ardmore in the
amount of $32,290.001 Fob Denton, with delivery in 14-21 days.
The lower prices offered by H.L. Peterson and Alamo Group
fail to meet specification.
t
I
SU194ARY: This bid is for the lease/purchase of a flail mower mounted
on a tractor for use by the Parks epartment in the
maintenance of parks and other city owned facilities.
M
BACKGROUND: TAbulation Sheet
I
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Parks Department, Park Maintenance, and Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: This equipment will be funded thru an existing lease/
purchase agreement based on a 36 month payout at 8.81 APR.
Respectfully submitted:
' II
Chris Hartung
City Manager
I
Prepared by,
it
Izz
ame: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
N : Jo J. rshall► C.P.M.
le: rchasing Agent
F n b H H
o ~ d d
~ a M
r
r, a ~o
N
x
N
~e
I
A 67 a
O
j o 00
a ~
v g
i
Q1 A ~
O O
$ po
o to
a
0%
o w °az
p v C7m
v o ~ se
a o as
0
p w C N
N ~
O
A N ~ n
N N h
rm "M
o ~
N
NOyr~rZ
O O
0 g z
oo W
N
I
1M
I
f
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Er.
F TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 69446 TRAFFIC CONTROLLER CABINETS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder,
` Consolidated Traffic Control, in the total amount of
$16,284.00, Fob Denton.
SUMMARY:, This bid is for the purchase of traffic control cabinets
for installation in the traffic control system. They will
replace some old obsolete units and also house new units
l at new installations.
BACKGROUND: TAbulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Traffic Control
FISCAL IMPACT: Account 6100-002-0012-8336
Maintenance of Traffic Control Lights
Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Pre ared by:
1
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
WaoNFoV'5_-_0'Aarshall, C.P.M.
N n ~ 00 ~
n to
N W
' as ~ M
f~D O~, y y
cr •J
< r
y M rt
T, t
to
r in
` W
1 Z~
O -1
x N 00 70
r
N m
m
a A
• t0
►r
Z
o
?d
e
! O N ^-If A A C"?
O
V z
7
1 Oi Q~
Z
r ~ O O 70 -i
O
w y cz~s-nEA
"n0
A
f
t ~
I
x
►
I
x
10
DATE: 5-14-85
1 CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
Y" SUBJECT: BID #9448 WESTGATE HEIGHTS - WATER PARTICIPATION
I
RECOMMENDATION: We recomnand this participation project be approved to pay
Denton - fEDI, Inc. the total sum of the low bidder to
install 12" water main in place of the required 8" main.
The low difference from the attached tabulation is that bid
by D/FW Utility in the amount of $5,931.80.
SU14 MRY: This bid is for the City of Denton to establish the low
difference of 12" water line over the required 8" water
line for the Utility Department.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Utility Department - Water b Sewer
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund.
kespectfully submitted:
f G. CF s artung
t City Manager
Prepared by:
: : J.r Marshall, C.P. '
► cidle: urchasing Agent
Approved:
k
n J. Marshall, C.P.M.
tle: -purchasing Agent
10
p N I~ n o N H
o v
N ~
a x s z s
00 \ \ rd
a co Oi r
z
I
~ z
w co
s+
m -4
w co ;K
~ ~ O to z
N V N
` ~ O th ¢7 Iff ~ ~i
f
r I AC1 \
Ot 00 rr ~y
S
a
Q1 o a
co w
1
0 PC
i
O 1VG z m
o °o
~ h d
~ • 70C h
O
O ~
f O ~ Z
r
I
w
DATE: 5-14-85
C CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: 810 #9449 WIRE, CUTOUTS AND PEDISTALS
r
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting
specifications for each item:
Item 2,4, and 5 Wesco $419152.00
Item 1,3, and 6 Poleline $21,193.00
` Item 7 Cummins $ 5,590.00
i Item 0 Temple $ j L845.00
Total Bid Award $74,780.00
The lower bid offered by Poleline on item 7 does not have an
interchangeable fuse board.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This material is replacement for warehouse stock.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this purchase are from Working Capital Account
0710-004-0598-8708 Inventory Electric.
Respectfully submitted:
G. T r s Hartung
City Manager
Pre ared by:
M: iame: Tom D. ShaM ul_z
w, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Marshall, C.P.M.
ieftl. ohm J.
Purchasing Agent
00 V A N A W
Pj g O O
p 10v r, rc
r G N 7 Q Q 17 L
6A g N A
tv r+ r+
to ~ w a
m 71
'v g
r P,°~ •
A 7 A
CD n Q
` No z
I
I
~Ny NN r~
O I 1 W W A ~O
Z
0 r
~D 1 O ~Vp1 AV t+ 1!1
' , Go G ' 10 OD ~
co cn
8 8 o w
N V
p
1
1 1 CD {{~~11 V ~
1 d t/1 V V
r
v
N A uVi ° G
r~
I
I pNf Lbn
O N O r V =
n ~ N
V
L
1
N I
I
C x
H M
I I 61
I~
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and hembers of the City Council
FHJM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 19451 REMOTE TERMINAL UNIT/ALARM EVENTS PRINTER
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Advance Control
r• Systems, Inc. in the amount of $21,300,00, Fob Denton.
I
SUMMARY: This unit will be utilized by the Water Production Plant
for control of pumping facilities for finished water.
BACKGROUND: Advance Control Systems is the only bidder currently able to
produce a remote terminal unit compatible with our main system
(SCADA).
PROGRAMSy DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this unit will come from Water Utility Bonds
Account #'623-008-0450-9101-7938
Respectfully submitted:
.Chris artvng
City Manager
Pe by:
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C,P.M,
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Nam ohn -sha 4.
Tit . P easing Agent
.
v
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
r
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 49452 ELECTRICAL TERMINATORS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bid meeting
specification of Temple, Inc. in the amount of $6,409.29.
The lower price offered by Poleline is for a different
manufacture brand than specified and fails to meet
specifications.
SUMMARY: This bid is for the purchase of high voltage electrical
terminators for use in the underground electric distribution
system.
,I
' BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Distribution
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Account 1610-008-0252-8333
C Maintenance of Underground Electric System
Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
! Prepared by:
► ame: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
f
Na Jo 'J "'Marshall, C.P.M.
F T e: rchaiing Agent
n
C7 M ty d
G d
a M
C.
r
74
F r
H
C 'O e+ 1
Q
M ~ H
30
ro
~Jn
H
H
2
` J
I
o J a+ on
r J • o l
.
III - . ~ w r Ln ro
' -r A O
tO r
0 r a co
M
C7 N
o m ' m
3 y o r
t+ N to
7 -R+
O w l,T
..r
a
n w rn z
~ a v r r
t~ p r Vf
~ c a ~ ~ z
c a z
~ 0 0 0
7~0
t9 00 A O.-A 1.4
O lr+ N W W
O
OU"
J
a
t7 co W N
7 01 M
w ~ M
1w
o ' N
I
v
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL. REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
r FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9455 WATER b SEWER SUPPLIES
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification for each item:
Item 1,2,5,6,7,9 and 10 Atlas Utility Supply $18,160.00
Item 3,4,11 and 12 Industrial International 14,065.00
Item 13 and 14 Trans Tex Supply 6,230.00
Item 8 Fergu:.n Universal 99900.00
SU1941RY: Total $48,355.00
This bid is for replacement of warehouse stock and is
estimated to be a 90 day supply.
i
,
` BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Warehouse/Water A Sewer Department
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Working Capital Account #710-004-0598-8709
Inventory Purchase Water 3 Sewer Department
Respectfully submitted:
Chris Hartung
City Waager
Prepared by:
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title:. Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
D
le: hn J. Marshall, C.P.11.
Purchasing Agent
1r
f
~o co
` n b M H
A d co
D Ln r%) .n
1 - 0 C tj H ~a
Ci CSC
C --I
ID x < f ii x A
M
s ~Hy m 0
ID =r %0 :1
tA co
c
C+ al a n CA
' 4
r%j
I
I,
I
E j m _
zm
i T N
'00 '4 1
:0 ~j N3
r
~ma
1440 A A 14 N Z;F to
9
~o 00 -j
A^d A
A
A 'Pb N) -4
C5 a
i s r
T
zm
<
al co A . n Z I
c r
00 \3 00 V N N
V o °o x
I
v o I
o y
a
r
Ln
Ln DO LM LA -pb 00
A
V Sd m
• ~ I
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
I
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9456 PAINTING OF TRUCK AND TRAILERS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder of
T & T Body Shop in the amount of $4,625.00.
SUNKARY: This bid is for the painting of two 3/4 ton pickups and
14 equipment trailers for the Utility Department. This is
a portion of the continuing effort to upgrade the appearance
of our motor pool fleet.
i
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Utility Department and Motor Pool Vehicle Maintenance
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds for Vehicle Maintenance
#710-004-0598-5710 Sublet Repairs
f Respectfully submitted:
G. hr s Hartung
City Manager
I
Pr ared by:
Name: om .-Shaw' C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
n Marshall, C.P.M.
le: Purchasing Agent
` ►to n ^Otl M H
10 0 0 d
t2l
O ~
co >
F O H
10
(D
r
t*7
40
00
W ro
1 H
A ~
O
I~ c=1
Q1 W =
om
rn w
w
u+ N
m Ch a c00 ,
6 CA vii 2 r
o 00 ° D m
o m
0 •
O °o o ~y m y
N
A W
I
co
m 4th
N O G O 9e
LA O
O O 7d
03 (n
y y J
d t.0 O ~ S
N O O p r
0 0 ~ r-
i
i
F
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
i
r_
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID 69458 LINE PULLER/TENSIONER
RECOMMENDATION: we recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification of Sherman/Reilly, Inc. n the amount
of $24,758.00 FOB Denton with delivery in 60 Days.
1,
i SUIVARY: This bid is for the purchase of a line puller/ten,ioner
gasoline powered, fully self-contained, with 6000` of 5/8"
rope. This equipment is used by the Electric Dist 1 ution
` Department in the maintenance and new construction if the
f overhead electric distribution system.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Electric Distribution and Motor Pool
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Account 6610-008-025209232
Electric Utility Capital Equipment
Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Pre ed by:
a.S`f
-
Name' c Tom to C .P.M.
Titl": Assistant Purchasing Agent
,Approved,
JMars is P.M.
jWt*Ie-Piurchaisi4nnSg Agent
i
10
t ro " n ro to co
F - o tin d d
O Qryr~ A H ea
1 O R7
A C r
o M MH
or ~ ID 3
Al N c
J A LTJ
y
'a
(D 7A0
H
rla
1
z
m
-s
k
c
S
F ~
M
< ;a m
toil W P7 m $
00 00 r 2
O
A O r
V t<+f .Ai
00 m
o
c~
x
S
z
g
10
0923L
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCOR-
DANCE WITH THE PROVI$iONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PIRCHASES
FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, state law requires that certain contracts requiring
an expenditure or payment by the City ir, en amount exceeding
$5,000 be by competitive bids, excapt in the case of public
calamity where it becomes necessary to act at ante to appropriate
money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the
property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the public
health of the citir4ns of the city, or in rnre of unfore- seen
damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that every
act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds or for
the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby determines that there is a public
calamity that makes it necessary to act at once co appropriate
money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve the
property of the city, or to protect the public health of the
citizens of the city, or to provide for unforseen damage to public
property, machinery or equipment, and by reason tha,:eof, the
following emergency purchases of materials, equi~ment, supplies or
services, as described in the "Purchase Orders' attached hereto,
are hereby approved:
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
66974 Borg-Warner A/Coed 8,791.88
67778 Bittercreek Const. 6,500.00
67923 Trans-Tex Supply 7,251.00
67979 Watson Distributing 146235-59
SECTION II.
That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated
employee is hereby authorized to purchase the msterials, equipment,
supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase Orders
and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such
emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of
state law exempting such purchases by the City from the require-
ments of competitive bide.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PAGE ONE
10
r
r
SECTION It.
That because of such emergency, the City Manager or designated
employee is hereby authorized to purchase the materials, equipment,
supplies or services as described in the attached Purchase Orders
` and to make payment therefore in the amounts therein stated, such
emergency purchases being in accordance with the provisions of
state law exempting such purchases by the City from the require-
ments of competitive bide.
SECTION III.
a That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and a;provsl.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the i4_ day of May , 1985.
e
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN9 CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
t
f BY:
i
i
' I
1
R
PAGE 2
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #66974 BORG-WARNER AIR CONDITIONING
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this Purchase Order Number 66974 to Borg-
Warner be approved for payment in the amount of
$8,791.88.
SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the emergency repairs to the
air conditioning systems at the Police Department. Repairs
included a new compressor, motor protectors, condenser for
motors, relays, solenoid valves and filer dryers. The original
estimate was for $9,600.00 plus. The actual amount is
$8,791.88.
BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #66974
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Police Department/Building Maintenance
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Account #100-003-0002-8301
Building Maintenance
Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
i
Prepared by:
ICZ 44azL~t~~7
Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
a J n 'J. Marshall, C.P.M.
T e: urchasing Agent
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
215 McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201
L P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO, DOCUMENT TYP
66e)74 03/25/85 CIO S
BOR49001
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
SORG-WARNER AIR CONDITIONING CONFIRMATION ONLY
YORK SERVICE 01%'ISION DO NOT DUPLICATE
12901. NICHOLSON SUITE 260
DALLAS, TX 75234
I
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOUN
01 100 003 0002 8301 1 REPAIR AIR COND-POLICE ADM 109000.00
i
0191. 4
The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. TOTAL FOR P.O. 109000.00 1
Reference P.O. Number on all Bll., Shipments and Involces.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
S*nd Involves TO: DIno1 All InqulrNs TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
Phone 61715668223 61715688311 DIFW Metro 2674042
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
DATE: 5-14-85
CITY COUNCIL REPQRT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
. FROM:
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #61778 BITTERCREEK CONSTRUCTION
RECOI~N~O..N: We recommend this purchase order in the amount of
$6,500.00 to Bittercreek Construction be approved
for payment.
This purchase order is for the clearing of the bird
roosting area near Kerley Street and Willow Springs.
The underbrush and some trees had to be pushed and rices
cleaned up. Telephone bids were requested and p
ranged from $8,000.00 to $6,510.00.
BACK_ R_OUKD Purchase Order #61178
Invoice from Bittercreek Construction
PROGRAMS DEPARIMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Bird Roos Control
FISCAL IMPACT: 1984-85 Budget Funds Account #100-002-0030-8303
Maintenance of Streets
Respectfully submitted:
G. Cps Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name: om D. haw, P.M.
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
Marshall, C.P.M.
le: Purchasing Agent
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
215 E. McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 76201
P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYP
67778 04/18/85 STREETS S
DIT49001 '
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
SITTERCREEK CONSTRUCTION
315 MOOONURST OR.
COPPELLs-TX 75019
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. UNE AMOUN
01 100 002 0030 8303 (.BIRD ROOST ERADICATION 6~500.00
The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt - House 8111 No. 20. T OR P.O. 60600.00
Reference P.O. Number on all 194, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
Send Invoices TO: Direct All Inquiries TO,
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent
215 E. McKlnndy St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Purchasing Agent
Phone 817466$223 81 ?/N&8311 D!F'W Metro 267-0042
The Cary of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
t
BITTER CREEK CONSTRUCTION
METRO 315 WOODHURST DR. MOBILE
471.1650 COPPELL, TEXAS 75019 384-0337
April 17, 1985
I' City of Denton
PurchasLng Dept.
INVOICE # 4175
i
P.O. # 67778
RE: Clearing trees between Willow Springs and Kerley St.
Contract $ 6,500.00
Hourly Equipment Rental
Kamatsu 220 Excavator 1311rs 9 90.00 Per Hr. N/C
Kamatsu Loader DS75 13Hrs @ 85.00 Per Er. N/C
Total Due $ 6,500.00
Thank You. We appreciate your business.
N
DATE: May 7, 1985
1 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
r
FROM: G, Clrris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Emergency Purchase Order #67923
RECOMM ENDATION: We recommend that the Emergency Purchase Order #67923
1F
to Trans-Tex for the amount of $7251.00, be approved for payment.
SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the 24" tapping valve needed to complete
I
the new Loop 288 24" waterline. This cbn'strus'tion will begin in May and the
tapping valve has an expected,delivery date of 10-12 weeks.
BACKGROUND:
P.O. # 67488 and per Bill Brown memo.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Water b Sewer Field
Service
FISCAL _114PACT: This purchase will impact the 1984-85 account #623-008
0461-9138.
Respectfully submitted:
~ City Manager
Prepared by:
tllnnAA.~
ame en se ann ng=
Title Buyer
Ap oved
me ohn Marshall
it1e Purchasing Agent
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
215 1- McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 78201
' P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYf
67923 04/t5/65 C17 S
TRA52500
VENDOR: SHIP TO'
TRANS-TEX SUPPLY CO WATER s SEVER FIELD SERVICE
BOX 188 CONFIRMATION ONLY
ARLINGTONs TEXAS 76010 DO NOT DUPLICATE
1
f
1
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUR
01 623 008 0461.9138 7915 1.24"TAPPING.VALVE IM667-07 79251.00
I(
1
CONFRATION
The City of Denton, Texas Is tax exempt • House 8111 No. 20. TOTAL,FOR P.O. 71251.00;
Reference P.O. Number on all 811, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
Send Invoices TO: Direst All Inquiries TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Mar3hall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent
215 F. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asel. Purchasing Agent
Phone 81715884223 81715688311 D1FW Metro 2874)042
The CIty of Banton Is an equal opportunity employer
q"► CITY OF DENTON
U71~rit~ M E M 0 R A N D U M
rrrrr rrorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.-rrr rrrr.rarrrrr+rrrrw
t
10: John Marshall, Purchasing Agent
• FROM: Bill Brown, Superintendent water and Sewer Field Services Division
DATE: April 1, 1985
SUBJ: Delivery of 24" Tapping Valve for Loop 288 Project
I have looked over the bids on the 24" tapping valve and have determined
that the valve which we should recommend is the bid from Transtex for a
vertical valve at $7,251 with a 10-12 week delivery.
The time element is of significant importance in this case and we must
have an early delivery as well as a good price.
I therefore recommend that we purchase the Mueller valve from Transtex
at $7,251 with a delivery of 10-12 weeks.
c .P---
BB/ch
cot file
VIf~4
APR 1
5 JgBS
C/ry
u yA fi okk
go
J. Marshall/WTRWW
DATE: 5-14-85
I
CITY COUNCIL. REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
I SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER 067979 WATSON DISTRIBUTING
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend Purchase Order 067979 to Watson Distributing
in the amount of $4,235.59 be approved.
SUMMARY: This purchase order is for the emergency repairs to a
Howard mower. The hydraulic system had to be reconditioned
as well as the transmission.
' BACKGROUND: Purchase Order 067979
Invoice 02858
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Park Departments and Vehicle Maintenance
i
FISCAL IMPACT: 1904-85 Budget Funds 710-004-0598-8710
[ Vehicle Maintenance Sublet Repairs
Respectfully submitted:
i
G. CChr s lariung
City Manager
Pre aced by:
f
- S
ame: om . awl C:P:ffi`-
Title: Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved:
ke I I 'Fiarsfiall urchasin9 AGent
I
WPM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
` 215 E. McKINNEY ST. PURCHASE ORDER DENTON, TX 78201
P. 0. NUMBER DATE/VENDOR NO. DOCUMENT TYP
67979 04/24/85 C14 5
WAT63000
VENDOR: SHIP TO:
WATSON DISTRIBUTING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1351 S LOOP 12 WEST CONFIRMATION ONLY
IRVING* TX 75060 00 NOT DUPLICATE
I'
II.
ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER UNITS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BID NO. LINE AMOUN
01 710 004 0598 8710 1,03700 REPAIR TRANS HYD SYSTEM 4.235059
I~
The City of Denton, Texas la tax exempt • House Bill No. 20. TOTAL 'FOR P_O• 41P23S*59
Reference P.O. Number on all SIL, Shipments and Invoices.
Shipments are I.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indicated.
Send Invoices TO: Direct All Inquiries TO:
City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C.F.M. Purchasing Agent
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 78201 Tom 0. Shaw, P . Asst. Purchasing Agent
817156SMil D/FW Metro 287-0042
Phone 8171MH223
The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer
10
f - D
G a
Los"
i i I~ k I ~ I I. I I;~ I ~I,` I :~h`.I .k. I ~k~ I I• I I, r
m f .yp : t' t f
It. .7
its
' rN{ ti' c~ • r D
00,
1
O
m 4
Y, 00
pi~ i a• 4 1/ l/. u l
N ,rt
r; W
r
DATE: J 8Jr
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager tjf 1=~`rJ~~`'~~ ;f
5UI?JfiCT: PARKING RF3TRICTION, HOLLYHILL AM 3 0 W t`
RECOMMENDATION:
11
Prohibition of parking on both sides of Hollyhill between Londonderry and
` Woodbrook.
SUMMARY:
l~
j BACKGROUND:
Area residents initiated tb: request and Citizen's Traffic Safety Support
Commission recommends approval.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED;
Transportation Engineering
F USCAL IMPACT:
Installation of No P.-x%ing signs will cost approximately Three Hundred
Dollars ($300.00).
Res pelf
r a g
City Manager
Pre red by
ame Koorosh 0 yaat
Title Traffic Engineer
C € Approved:
Name
Title
1072L
F
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON BOTH SIDES OF
M HOLLYHILL BETWEEN LONDONDERRY AND WOODBROOK; PROVIDING A SEVER-
ABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO H1°VDRED
DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall
f park a vehicle at any time upon the following street in the City
of Denton to-wit:
Berth sides of Hollyhill between Londonderry and Woodbrook.
i
SECTION II.
The provisions of Section I prohibiting the parking of vehicles
shall apply at all times to the street and part of Streets
designated therein except when it is necessary to stop a vehicle
to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the
direction of a police officer or official traffic control device.
SECTION III.
Any person adjudged guilty of parking a vehicle In violation
of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by
a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00).
SECTION IV.
That if any section, subsection, parsgraph, sentence, clause,
phrase or word in thief ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent
1 jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
i
CLty of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such
remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance jtliall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
PAGE l
directed to cause the captl.on of this ordinance to be publishf.d
Y,.
` twice in the Denton Reccrd•Chronicle, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of f.ts
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICRARD 0. STEWART$ MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
ATTEST:
ALLEN, MARLOWE CITY M
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: iTz
4
f
,
PAGE 2
r
i
CITIZEN'S TRAFFIC SAFETY
SUPPORT COMMISSION MEETING
PRESENT
Bruce Chamberlain, Vice Chairperson
Vivian Edwards
Wayne Autry
Dan Martin
Virginia Gallian
Doris Chipman
John Tompkins
r ABSENT
Gilbert Bernstein, Chairperson
STAFF
Koorosh Olyai, Traffic Engineer
Virginia Bezy, Staff Secretary
r
The Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Connnission meeting was
called to order by Vice Chairperson Bruce Chamberlain in regular session
at 3s45 P.M., on Monday, April 8, 1985, in the Council Chambers of the
Denton Municipal Building. Commissioner Martin made a motion to accept
the minutes of the January 14, 1985, meeting. Commissioner Gallian
I
seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
ITEM 033 CONSIDERATI(,N OF PARKING RELATED PROBLEMS ON HOLLYHILL
'I BETWEEN LOR.jONDERRY AND WOODBROOK
Mr. Olyai stated to the Commission that Mrs. Mary Ann
1
Keffer, residing at 1912 Hollyhill, was preaent to address the
1
Citizen'E Traffic Safety Support commission
April 8, 1985
Page 2
Commission concerning parking related problems on Hollyhill between
Londonderry and Woodbrook.
Mrs. Keffer stated to the Commission that she had resided at
r 1912 Hollyhill for ten (10) years. She further stated that at the time
she moved to 1ollyhill it had "No Parking" signs posted and "No Parking"
enforced at this location. Mrs. Keffer stated that approximately a year
ago the "No Parking" signs had disappeared and that upon research by
City staff, no City ordinance prohibiting parking could be located.
Mrs. Keffer went on to state that the intersection in
question was a "T" intersection and that cars parked on both sicleb of
the street up to the intersection. Mrs. Keffer stated that automobiles
at the intersection as well as pedestrians wishing to cross the inter-
section had to go out into the line of traffic in order to see to cross
the intersection. Mrs. Keffer also stated that past the intersection on
the east side of Hollyhill is the Southridge Community Swimming Pool.
Mrs. Keffer stated that because of the swimaing pool and with summer, a
lot of children would be crossing this intersection. Mrs. Keffer
further stated that she was petitioning the Commission to recommend an
ordinance for "No Parking" on Hollyhill between Londonderry and
Woodbrook.
Commissioner Martii asked Mrs. Ycffer if there were any
property fronting west on Hollyhill. Mrs. Keffer replied that there
were none, other than apartments and one duplex.
M
Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission
April 8, 1985
Page 3
At this time, Joan Polen, another resident of Hollyhill,
reported that because of the design of the intersection and the angle,
an automobile had to pull into the line of traffic in order to see if
c
the intersection was clear. Mrs. Polen further stated that this area
was used a great deal by joggers and bicyclists and that it was a
dangerous area.
Commissioner Martin asked Mrs. Polen if anyone's front yard
would be affected if rNo Parking" was reinstated. Mrs. Polen stated
that it would not.
Commissioner Tompkins asked if when the tenants of the area
apartments parked on the street if the parking lots were full.
Mrs. Polen stated that they were not. She further stated that street
parking was closer to the entrance of some apart"ants and this is why
they chose to park on the street other than the parking lot provided by
the apartments.
Vice Chairperson Chamberlain asked if the Commission had any
more questions of Mrs. Keffer or Mrs. Polen and they did not. Vice
Chairperson Chamberlain then asked Mr. 01yai to address the Commission.
Mr. 01yai stated to the Commission that although Hollyhill
was designed 45 feet wide and should be able to accommodate two (2)
lanes of traffic and two (2) lanes of parking, because of the angle of
the curve it could not safely do so. Mr. 01yai further stated that
there was only one residential unit at the corner of Hollyhill and
l
Woodbrook and that this residence fronted Woodbrook. Mr. 01yai went on
i
FM
I
R
C
Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission
April 8, 1985
Page 4
r
to state that due to design, there was also a drainage problem which
added to the traffic problem. Mr. Olyai stated that the "Yield Right of
Way" sign had been replaced by a "Stop" sign for safety reasons.
Mr. Olyai stated that he concurred with Mrs. Polen inasmuch
h
as the apartment tenant parking was primarily due to the location of the
I '
apartment and tenant preference.
s
Mr. Olyai further stated that his recommendation is that
parking be prohibited on the west side of Hollyhill from Londonderry to
r Woodbrook. Mr. Olyai further stated that to eliminate parking on both
sides of Hollyhill could encourage speeders,
Commissioner Autry asked Mrs. Keffer if the original "No
1 Parking" signs had been on both sides of Hollyhill. Mrs. Keffer replied
that it had. Mrs. Keffer further stated that "No Parking" was requested
on both sides of Iollyhill. She stated that although "No Parking" on
the west side would help the situation that the east side of Hollyhill
is where the Southridge Community Swimming Pool is located and that
children walk along the east side to go to the pool.
Commissioner Autry asked how many parking spaces would be
eliminated if parking was restricted on both sides of Hollyhill?
Mrs. Polen replied that approximately seven (7) spaces on each side of
the street would be eliminated.
Vice Chairperson Chamberlain asked if there were any further
questions. There were none and he asked if there was a motion from the
Commission.
r
Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission
E April 8, 1985
F Page 5
Commissioner Gallian made a motion, seconded by Commissioner
Edwards, to eliminate parking on Hollyhill between Londonderry and
Woodbrook. The motion carried four (4) to three
(3) with Commissioners
Martin, Autry, and Tompkins voting against the motion.
ITEM 04: CONSIDERATION Of' PARKING RELATED PROBLEMS ON
IANDONDERRY AND SAM B SS ROAD
Ms. Debbie Cottle appeared before the ommission to request
I
"No Parking" on the west side of Sam Bass Road. Ms. Cottle stated that
r ~
j Sam Bass Road is 32 feet wide and has apartments on each side.
(tJ Ms. Cottle further stated that with cars parking on each side of the
i
road, it created a dangerous situation with children darting between
parked cars. Vs. Cottle further stated that "No Parking" is already in
effect for most of Sam Bass Road,
Mr. Olyai stated to the Commission that Sam Bass Road is a
residential street and by making it "No Parking" on the west side, it
would open up another lane to traffic and, therefore, encourage
speeders. For this reason, Staff recommends against "No Parking" on Sam
Bass Road.
i
Ms. Cottle addressed the Commission and stated that at
night, cars park on both sides of the street and inasmuch as it is at
the top of a hill, it creates a dangerous situation,
Commissioner Tompkins asked Ms. Cottle who primarily parks
on the street. Ms. Cottle replied that it was tenants of the apartment
v
DATE: 5-~y_ 85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
T0;
F Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM; G, Chris Hartun
p a, city manager
SUBJECT: PARKING RESTRICTION, SAM BASS
1
f RECOMMENDATION.-
Prohibition of parking on the west side of Sam Bass between I-35 Service
I Road and Londonderry.
Ilip
SUMMARY:
y:
BACKGROUND:
I Management of West Wind Apartments initiated the request and Citizen's
Traffic Safety Support Commission recommends approval.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTE--------------
D'
f Transportation Engineering
FISCAL IMPACT:
Installation of No Parking signs will cost approximately Three Hundred
Dollars ($300.00).
Respectfully submitted:
r s ar ung
City Manager
Pre aredj'b~
ame Kooros olyai
7Title Traffic Engineer
C Approved:
Name _
:ttle
1073L
I
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON THE WEST SIDE
OF SAM BASS FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35-E
SERVICE ROAD TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH LONDONDERRY; PROVIDING A
SEVEKABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED
DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
r
When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall
park a vehicle at any time upon the following street in the City
of Denton to-wit:
I The west aide of Sam Bass from its intersection with
Interstate Highway 35-E Service Road to its intersection
i with Londonderry.
SECTION II.
The provisions of Section I prohibiting the parking of
vehicles shall apply at all times to the street and part of
{ streets designated therein except when it is necessary to stop a
vehicle to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with
the direction of a police officer or official tra:fle control
device.
SECTION III.
j Any }person adjudged guilty of parking a vehicle in violation
of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by
a fine not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars (;200.00).
SECTION IV.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such
i
remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
t
PAGE 1
i
r
i
C
Er.
r .
SI.CTION V.
TI at this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from tie date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
direct(.i to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice is the Denton Record•Chronicle$ the official newspaper of
k the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSEI AND APPROVED this the day of
1985.
RICKARD
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i
ATTEST:
I'
ClukLOTTE-KM N) C 1 T T-nTRETM
CITY OF DENTOh TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO EGAL FORK:
DEBRA ADAMI DRA'OVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF D,~E,NTOON~N,,~,,~TEXAS
BY: AI ~lflr-fd[(e 1 ,
PAGE 2
1
Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission
April 8, 1985
Page 5
r ~
' Commissioner Gallian made a motion, seconded by Commissioner
r
Edwards, to eliminate parking on Hollyhill between Londonderry and
Woodbrook. The motion carried four (4) to three (3) with Commissioners
Martin, Autry, and Tompkins voting against the motion.
ITEM 114: CONSIDERATION OF PARKING RELATED PROBLEMS ON
j LONDONDERRY AND SAM BASS ROAD
I
i Ms. Debbie Cottle appeared before the Commission to request
"No Parking" on the west side of Sam Bass Road. Ms. Cottle stated that
Sam Bass Road is 32 feet wide and has apartments on each side.
Ms. Cottle further stated that with cars parking on each side of the
road, it created a dangerous situation with children darting between
1
parked cars. Ms. Cottle further stated that "No Parking" is already in
effect for most of Sam Bass Road.
I
Mr. Ol.yai stated to the Commission that Sam Bass Road is a
residential street and by making it "No Parking" on the west side, it
would open up another lane to traffic and, therefore, encourage
speeders. For this reason, Staff recommends against "No Parking" on Sam
Bass Road.
i
Ms. Cottle addressed the Commission and stated that at
i
night, cars park on both sides of the street and inasmuch as it is at
i
the top of a hill, it creates a dangerous situation.
I
1 Commissioner Tompkins asked Ms. Cottle who primarily parks
t
on the etreet. Ms. Cottle replied that it was tenants of the apartment
I
Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission
April 8, 1985
Page 6
who park there because it is closer to their apartments. Commissioner
Tompkins asked Ms. Cottle if there were adequate parking spaces for the
apartment tenants. Ms. Cottle replied that there was.
Commissioner Autry made a motion to restrict parking on the
west side of Sam Bass Road from Londonderry to 1-35. Commissioner
Gallian seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 5:05 P.M.
i
3
t
}
Bruce Chamberlain Koorosh Olyai
Vice Chairperson Traffic Engineer
i
I
i
t
I
00
DATE: May fit/ 1955
I
r.
[ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
r TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council O 1
r FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE PROHIBITING TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON AIRPORT ROAD
DURING THE 1985 AIRSHOW
RECOMMENDATION:
I~
The staff recommends adoption of the ordinance prohibiting two-way vehicular traffic
on Ai port Road f,rom I-35W to the Denton Municipal Airport during the Confederate Air
Force Airshow on June 8 and 9, 1985.
SUMMARY:
Y rn order to facilitate traffic flow on Airport Road during this year's airshow, it
i will be necessary to prohibit two-way vehicular traffic on Airport Road during the
peak traffic flow on the mornings of the show, vehicles will be
allowed to use both lanes of Airport Road to enter the Airport. After the shows,
vehicles will be allowed to use both lanes to exit.
BACKGROUND:
This same a ng the It allowed allotraffic toienter andtoxitrwithout creatingh nyamajorrbottl~ite well.
the overpasses and ramps on I-35. enecks on
i
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED;
The primary effect of this ordinance will be on the spectators of the airshow and the
Denton Police Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There will be no real fiscal impact resulting from the adoption of this ordinance.
Respect 11 ubmi e .
C. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
ails Angelo
Assistant Director of Public Works
APProv,sd b ,
Bill Angelo
Assistant Director of Public Works
ai
tUOJL
f
1
NO.
r r
r AN ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY ?ROHIEITINO TWO-WAY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON
AIRPORT ROAD FROM INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35V TO THE DENTON MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT AND AIRPORT ROAD FROM THE AIMRT TO INTERSTATE HIGHWAY
SSW; PROVIDING A SEVERAEILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY NOT TO
EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE [SATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after
due investigation and consideration, has determined that the best
interest and welfare of the public vill be served by prohibiting
two-way vehicular traffic on Airport Road during the Confederate
Airshov on June 9 and 9, 1985; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That Airport Road from Interstate Highway 35W to the Denton
Municipal Airport and Airport Road from the Airport to Interstate
Highway 35W is hereby c,snged from two-way vehicular traffic to
one-way vehicular traffic during the Confederate Airshov on June 8
and 9, 1995.
SECTION 11.
' The provisions of Section I prohibiting two-vay vehicular
traffic shall apply at all times to those portions of Airport Road
II designated therein and shall revert to tvo-way traffic on June 10,
1985.
SECTION 111.
r Any person adjudged guilty of a violation of this ordinance
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine not to
exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00).
r SECTION IV.
That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause,
r phrase or word in :his ordinance, or application thereof to any
person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent
r
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the
r
Y
r
F
i
City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such
remaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION V.
' j. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
trice in the Denton Record-Chronic Is, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of tht data of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.
RICHAR.D 1
i .
j CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS
i
I
4 ATTEST:
i
ALLEN, CHARLOTTE
CITY SEMMTM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAM DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: y f nt
{
i
i
i
Page 2
Minutes
Airport Advisory Board
4. The Board considered recommending to the City Council the approval
E of a resolution accepting the Airport Use Agreement with the
` Confederate Air ?orce for the purpose of staging an airshow. A motion
was made and seconded to recommend approval of the resolution and
lease agreement as writen. The motion carried unanimously.
I'
5 The Board considered recommending to the City Council adopting an
ordinace temporarily allowing one-way traffic along Airport Road
during the airshow. A motion was made and seconded to recommend
to the City Council the adoption of the ordinace as written. The
I',--motion carried unanimously.
6. The Board met in executive session to discuss legal and real estate
matters at 9:45 P.M. The Board reconvened in open session at 10:50 P.M.
With no further business, the Board adjourned at 10:50 P.M.
i
1
1
A
I
1
DATE: May iV, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council O ~FROM: G. Ctris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE CONVEYING 0.991 ACRES OF LAND TO THE TOWN OF CROSS ROADS
RE :OMb Et4DAT ION t
The staff recommends adoption of the ordinance conveying 0.991 acres of real property
to the Town of Cross Roads.
r
SUMMARY:
On April 5, 1983, the City Council of the City of Denton and the Town Council c the
Town of Cross Roads entered into an agreement which settled a di.spnte between the two
entities relative to the Mosely Road Landfill Site. Section A-7 of that agreement
j (copy attached) obligated the City of Denton to sell to the Town of Cross Roads one
acre of land from the site for price of $10.00. Upon surveying and subdividing
9 the site into separate tracts, we have offered the Town of Cross Roads a 0.991 acre
i tract near the old landfill entrance. This tract contains an old house which is of
no further use to the City of Denton. The Town of Cross Roads intends to remodel
this house and use it and the property for its Town Hail.
s
BACKGROUND:
No additional background information.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTNENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
I
Solid Waste Disposal
FISCAL IMPACT:
There will be no significant fiscal impact to the City of Denton from this trans-
action as the land is of 1?ttle, if any, use to the City and would not be highly
marketable given its location.
Respectfully submitted,
G. Ch vV_ ...do
-
City Manager
Prepared by:
r
Assistant Director of Public Works
Approved byr
. j~ i
4~
Bill Angelo
Assistant Director of Public Works
f
r sw7
41
M
F 1064L
i
f AN ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING THE CONVEYANCE
f OF 0.991 ACRES ^F REAL PROPERTY TO THE TOWN OF CROSSROADS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH AN AGREEMENT, PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ON APRIL S,
1983, BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE TOWN OF CROSSROADS;
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSAF.Y DOCCMENTS AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on April 5, 1983, the City Council of the City of
Denton approved en agreement between the City of Denton and the
Town of Crossroads concernird the continued operation of the
Mosely Road landfill site; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the benefits received by Denton
r pursuant to said agreement, Denton agreed, upon closure of the
landfill site, to convey one acre of land to the City 3f Corinth;
and
WHEREAS, the sanitary landfill site has been closed and the
Town of Crossroads has performed its obligations and covenants
contained in said agreement; and
' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has determined
that it has received from Corinth, in the performance of said
agreement, consideration equal to or greater than the value of the
property to be conveyed herein; and
f WHEREAS, such conveyance of land is not a sale or exchange of
land for other land, requiring a public notice and sealed bids in
r accordance with the provision of Texas Revised Civil Statutes
Annotated Art. 6252-17a; NOW THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves the conveyance, by
special warranty deed, to the Town of Crossroads the following
described property;
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the R. J.
Mosely Survey, Abstract Number 803, Denton County, Texas, and
being past of a called first tract and part of a called third
tract in a deed from S. 0. :apps et ux to City of Denton on the
2nd day of December, 1960, and recorded in Volume 4620 page 465,
Deed Records of said County, and being more particularly described
as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel pin on the south boundary line of said first
tract and in the center of Tipps Road and being South 69°2659"
East 634.88 feet from the southwest corner of said first tract;
THENCE North 05°50'56" East with the edge of a driveway a distance
197.86 feet to a steel pin in a north-south fence;
THENCE North 13°22'09" East with the edge of said driveway a
distance 86.81 feet to a steel pin;
PAGE 1
Iii
10
n
Y
I~
• h 18°11'54" East with the edge of said driveway a
THENCE Nor[
distance of 231.39 feet Lo a steel pin;
P
' THENCE South 84°12'30" East u distance of 19.50 feet to a steel
e pin in a north-south fence;
THENCE South 00°47'30" West with said fence a distance 502.08 feet
to a steel pin on the south boundary line of said third tract and
in the center of Tipps Road;
p
THENCE to Pointh of Beginning containing in all
0.991 acres of land.
SECTION II.
t
That the Mayor and City Secretary, respectively, are authorized
to executa and attest the documents necessary to effeco said
conveyance.
i
SFCTION 111.
i 1
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
e
i PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1485.
e -l~y~EE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
A'IT EST :
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: PAGE 2
I
I
r•
A A-11 'A KR\NTY DIID-W.,1 G.~,.i. 4 f.,,r-,., • Akuc •ln'r'~er i.
Y\R TIF $a han e7 fe, DdW
TILE STATE OF TEXAS, Know All lien l3 T}lese Presents:
COi'STT OF_ _DENTUti_ _ y
nat the City of Dentun, Texas, a Munic(pal Corpuratton
of the County of Denton , State of Texas for and in Wneideration of
r
the sum of
DOLLARS,
t.
to it in band paid by the Town of Crossroads
f
t ~
'I
[L■ ' 1
r !
have Granted, Sold and Con~ey:d, and by thcx prewnis do Grant, Sell and Convey unto the said Town of
Crossroads
of the County of Denton State of Texas ytIIX9 Xid(IllftY
All that certain tract or parcel of lend situated in the R. J. Mosely
Survey, Abstract Number 803, Denton County, Texas, and being part of a
'called first tract and part of a called third tract in a deed from S. 0.
Tipps et ux to City of Denton on the 2nd day of December, 1960, and
,recorded in Volume 462, page 465, Deed Records of said County, and being
,'more particularly described as follows:
li
(BEGINNING at a_steel pin on the south boundary line of said first tract
and in the center of Tipps Road and being South 89026'59" East 634.86
feet from the southwest corner of said first tract;
,THENCE North 05050'56" Esst with the edge of a driveway a distance 191.86
feet to a steel pin in a north-south fence;
jTHENCE North 13022'09" East with thta edge of said driveway a distance
i{86.81 feet to a steel pin;
(THENCE North 18011'54" East with the edge of Fsid driveway a distance of
11111,39 feet to a steel pin;
THENCE South 89012'30" East a distance of 19.50 feet to a steel pin in a
'north-south fence;
!THENCE South 00041'30" west with said fence a distance 502.08 feet to a
steel pin on the south boundary line of said third tract and in the
f (center of Tipps Road;
THENCE North 89026'59" West with the center of Tipps Road a distance of
1;125.06 feet to Point of Beginning containing in all 0.991 acres of land.
. IC
I I
F
i
t
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, together with all snd singular, the rights and
i
appurtenances thereto fn anywise belonging unto the sJd City of Denton, Texas, its successors
j
I
does
Uftandassigns forever;and it /do hereby bind itself, its successors and assigns
AN"eaecutors and admiristtators, to Warrant and Forever Defend all and singular the mid premises unto the
said Town of Crossroads, its successors
I
191% and assigns against every person whomsoever Tawfully claiming, or to dalm the same, or any part
thereof.. by, through or under it, but not otherwise.
Witness hand at Denton, Texas this day of
i ,.ti.D. w85
i
Witnesses at Request of Grantor:
ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON! TEXAS
.
CHAfiLO9TE ALLEN,"CITY SFCRETAftf BY RICHARD O. BTEWART, "1lAY0R
r
f
r
f '
C R E 6 0 L 0 T I O N
F WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Council of the City of
Denton to authorise an Agreement between the City of Denton and
1 the Town Tf Cross Roads concerning the City of Denton's existing
Mosley Road sanitary landfill site; NOW, THEREFORE,
DE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS;
EE CTION L
That the Mayor of the City of Denton, Tema$ is hereby `
authorised to execute an Agreement between the City of Denton
1 r
and the Town of Cross Roads in consideration of the mutual '
` covenants set out in the Agreement attached hereto.
II` PASSED AND APPROVED this the y day of April, 196).
f
1 - ,
TEW T, MAY R
CST OF D~ TON, TEXAS
RI,pT EN, Y 5 C T
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL rom
C. J. TAYWP, JR., CITY ATTCONLY
CITY OP DENTON, TEXAS
HYr
I
ti
y~
10
r'
THE 6TATE or TEXAS S '
COUNTY of DENTON S AGREEMENT
S
"EREAS, the City of Denton, Texas and the Town of Cross
Roads, Texas, municipal corporations with the authority and
power to contract, do hereby enter into this agreement concerning
the City of Denton's existing Mosley K~ad sanitary landfill
site, the public Koala adjacent thereto and the new proposed
sanitary landfill site and in consideration of the mutual
I covenants set out herein agree as follows,
A. Covenants of the City of Dentoni
1• Mosley Road Improvement.;
The City of Denton shall make the following
improvements on Mosley Roadr
e
(a) Blade roadside ditches and remove
excess dirt to provide for proper
drainage;
I
(b) install a twsntY-tour inch, thirty
toot Culvert under Mosley Road, just
south of Mr, Steven Bartel'I home;
I
(c) Blade existing humps in road to pro_ j
vide a level road surface; f
(d' Rework soft spots to proper moisture
and compaction and to test before
::!ling with loaded tandem axle ?
cks
(e) Blade on hot mix asphalt to fix pules
anrdgqsmoppoecth rough areas and to apply a
entire lengthaolothaeroadoto e the ridth
of twent five !
steel and/or rubber~tire nroroll %ith
llers.
`L g• ?1ppA_R2ad Imoroyementss
1 The City of Denton shall make the foll-r.!ng
1 improvements on Tipps Road,
(a) Blade roadside ditches and remove
excess dirt to provide for proper
drainage)
(b) Rework Soft spots to proper moisture
and compaction, test before sealing
with loaded tandem axle truck. Add
gravel end prepare baa: for seal coat
iE applications
Apply single penetration seal coat
the entire width of the road to a
width of twenty feet, then roil with
• steel and/or rubber tire rollers.
AGREEMENT - PACE ONE
10
(dl Instail one fifteen in,-h, twenty foot
r, driveway culvert.
i (el All existing culverts ahould be free
3. Pot and clear Of dirt and debris.
R f
tersh oy Roal
r The City of Denton shall make the following
imorovemr:ts to Potters!:op Poadt
~ (a) Male roadside ditches and remove excess
dirt to provide fcr proper drainage;
(bi Prmcve and replace four (4) driveway
culverts with fifteen inch culverts;
Ice A?.d two 12) additional fifteen inch
!vert Aer the road and install
.!;ti ral gravel as needed to accom-
,;tallationsl
I
A.•. :.Ise rn lcw areas of ss Li
r< `re a seal seating and apply
s:r,gle penetratlon seal coat along
the entire Iegnth of the road to a
width of twenty feet, then roll with
Is rubber tire rollers.
Set The language. 'penetration seal coat' is
used in paragraphs Al, A2 and A3 shall
wean one application of liquid road
asPialt covered with fine pea gravel
rolled with rubber and steal tire rollers.
` 4. Performance of Street Imarovemontir
f The City of rnnton shall accomplish the street
improvements specified herein at its c.m cost
1 and expense with its employees or contractors
Of its own choosing. Improvements on Ti,,ps
and Pottershop Road shall begin within fourteen
days, weather permitting, after the approval
of thls agreement by the parties hereto and
E the approval of Denton county is obtained.
! Improvements to M»ley toad shall begin within
thirty days, weather permitting, after final
closure of Ite existing landfill is complete.
S. C1t of Oenton Indemnification of the Town
O Cross Roa _si
The City of Denton agreea to pprotect, defend,
indemai:y and save the Town cf Crass Roads,
its officers, directors, employees, frca and
against All claims, demands and causes of
action of every kind and character, without
limit and without regard to the cause or
causes thereof, that may arise as the result
of the Ci', of Oenton's negligence, of any
kind wn.'soever, in the performance of Lois
contract.
S. Closure of Landfillt
The City of Denton agrees to cease accepting
refuse at the Mosley Road landfill site on or
before January 31, 1914 or when the Texas
AGREEMENT - PAGE 740
E
Department of Bealth notifies the City of Denton
that the new City of Denton sanitary landfill
site is approved to accept solid vast*, which-
evei occurs first. The parties agree that this
closing date shall superceda the projected
closing date the City of Denton submitted in
1 their August 30, 1912 let'.*[ addressed to the
Texas Department of Health.
The City of Denton shall Complete cover operations
at the Mosley Road kendfi11 site by May 31, 1984
or within five (5) months after the new landfill
site is approved to accept refuse, whichever
occurs first.
7. Sale of handLikl P[opert_vt
The City of Denton shall, after closure of the
Mosley Road landfill site, sell one 11) acre o.:
such site to the To,'n of Cross Roads for a sum of
` Ten and No/100 ($13.00) Dollars.
8. Inspec tton:
The City of Denton acknowledges that the Town of
Cross Roads shall have tt+e p[SvJIege to designate
Or's representative who shell at all times have
access to the work construction site for the
a purpose of observing tests andfor inspecting
the Wo:k of the City of Denton to be performed
under this cantfact. The City of Denton further
agreed to fully cooperate with said inspector
that tha Town of Cross Roads may elect to hire
at its own expense. The City of Cross Roads
shall notify the City of Denton Within raven
days from the date of ratification of this
contract by both parties of the name and
address of said inspector.
B. Covenants of the Town of Cross Roads:
1. yo Contest of tsnofill_rjers ins,
The Town of Cress Roads shall not, in its
governmental capacity, or acting directly or
indirectly through or by any natural person,
complain to or petition any governments
agency, board or commission or bring e:it
any court of law, or otherwise contest in a ,y
way, so as to Denton, so long raiitne City o 'Denton City of
with all provisions of this lreeme-•, and
performing or doing any of the fol' ingt
f (a1 Continuing pursuaat tt a
to paragraph 61
(b) Opening of mpkina use of t,~ proposed
new sanitary landfill sites or
(c) Ter%inating the use of the Mostly Road
landfill site at the final closure *lava
tion submitted by the City of Denton in
` a Setter and attachments to the Texas
f Department of Health dated August 10, 1982.
C. The City of Denton further warran!e r:,d represents
that it will Lully cN°.ply with •-.e landfill closure
' ACREEMENT - PAGE THRFE
,
I
1
I
r
w
DATE: 05/14/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council /O1 l.S.
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR ZONING CASE Z-1728
' RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council considered this item at its meeting of April 2,
( 1985 and voted to approve Z-1728.
I
I, SUMMARY:
This was a request for a change in zoning from the planned
development (PD) district to the commercial (C) classification
on a 12.1 acre tract located at the northwest corner of Spencer
' Road and Loop 288.
F BACKGROUND:
This tract was a portion of a 20 acre planned development for a
I private utility shop and yard approved in 1973. In 198'x3 eight
acres of the planned development were rezoned commercial. Since
the Denton County Electric Co-op relocated, the petitioner asked
to rezone the remaining 12 acres of the planned development (PD)
commercial. The approved commercial zoning is compatible with
high intensity area policies.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the the general fund.
Recl~y u fitted:
a E
U-7-Mis Hartung
City Manager
P-epared by:
xt Denise Spf~y~F
Urban Planner
Appro d:
Jeff Meye
i)irector of Planning
and Community Development
0847,E
1F
r
107UL
1
NO.
I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
` AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
f THE CITY 0E DENTUN, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO APPROXI'iATELY 12.153 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE MARY
L. AU.~CI14 S!'RVbY, :kBS'rRACT W. 4, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED
AT TH n :5T "IP?+FR OF SPENCER ROAD AND LOOP 288; TO PROVIDE
FOR n c I'. IiNG '.ASSIFICAT1014 AND USE DESIGNATION FROM
PLANNED I.VE1., "1'f• DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO
COMMERCIAL "C" CLASSIFII-Ai1ON AND USE FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND
DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. r
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: `
SECTION 1.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicatle
to all or part of the proRerty described below is hereby changed
from Plannad Development PD" District Classification and Use to
Commercial "C" District Classification and Use under the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Mary L.
Austin Survey, Abstract Number 4, City and County of Denton and
being part of a called 20.136 acre tract described in a deed
from W. V. Tu,nicliff, Trustee to Denton County Electrical
Cooperative, Inc. on the 15th day of August, 1973, recorded in
Volume 682, Page 615, Deed Rccords of said County and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNIiiG at a tAteel pin on the north right-of-way of Spencer
Road and the southwest corner of said 20.136 acre tract;
THENCE north 01°15'10" west with the west line of said 20.136
acre tract a distance of 1068.30 feet to a steel pin at a fence
` corner also being the northwest corner of said 20.136 acre tract;
f THENCE south 87°33'32" east with a fence and with the north line
r of said tract a distance of 993.08 feet to a steel pin on the
west right-of-way of Loop 288 also being the northeast line of
I said 20.136 acre tract;
THENCE soutgwusterly with a c'irve to right which has a central
angle of 00 41'36" a radius of 2804.8 feet a chord bearing and
dicta ce of south 5°21'15" wait 33.94 feet and an arc distance
of 33.94 feet to right-of-way past;
I
THE'ICE south 16°33'43" west with the west right-of-way cof said
` highway a distance of 197.27 feet to a steel pin;
THENCE southieesterly with said right-of-wady and wi.h a c+,rve to
G right which has a central angle cE 12°00'(!0" a raoiua of 2i0^9.10
feet a chord of south 19°42'04" west 50.23 feet and an arc
distance of 584.297 feet to a steel pin;
THENCE north 50°56'40" west a distance of 863.07 feet to a steel
pin,
THENCE south 01°15' 10" east u distance of 800.81 feet to a
steel pin on the north right-of-way of Spencer Road;
2-1728/SPENCER-LOOP VENTURE/PAGE l
E
THENCE north 87°04'08" west with the .:orth right-of-way of said
road a distance of 60.16 feet to point of beginning an
containing in e;l 12.153 acres of land.
SECTION II.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the
14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No.
69-1, be, and the same is hereby emended to show such change in
District Classification and Use.
SECTION III.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby !
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive [
plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the
City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among
other things for the character of the district and for its
peculiar suitability or particular uses, and with a view to
conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives,
and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the
maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, sad its citizens.
SECTION IV.
i
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASS$D AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CRARI,UTTE NUER, CITY -SEL"itE"I~itKy
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM.
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DEMON, TEXAS/
Z-1728/SPENCER-LOOP VENTURE/PAGE 2
10
r1
I
P b Z Minutes
March 13, 1985
Page 6
C.+ Z-1728. This is the petition of Charles Watkins,
representing Spencer-Loop Ventura, req,jesting a change
` in zoning from the planned development (PD) clessifi-
cation to the commercial (C) district on s 12.1 acre
tract located at the northwest corner of Spencer Road
and Loop 288. The curTent planned development will
permit the construction of a private utility shop and
` yard. If the request is approved, the property may be
used for any purpose permitted in th,e commercial (C)
district by the City of Denton Zoning Ordinance.
Ms. Spivey stated there were nine reply forms mailed
to property owners; none were returned.
Mr. Pearson left the meeting.
I
Mr. Charles Watkins stated he is representing Spencer-
Loop Venture, which is a tract remaining of a planned
development zoned for the Denton County Electric Co-op.
r He stated they are askin for straight commercial
zoning. He added the adjoining eight acres is zoned
commercial. He explained the existing utilities on the
property. He added this property is included on a CIP
plan for water service which will service this tract.
He stated he feels this request is consistent with the
Development Guide.
Mr. LaForte made reference to the triangular shaped
tract and asked how land gets shaped in the peculiar way
that this tract is.
Mr. Watkins BA ted apparently it was designed that way.
Mr. Sidor commented this originally was all Denton
County Electric Co-op's property and they sold part of
that land last year. He askkad what is ',,17,g proposed.
Mr. Watkins stated basically commercial type develop-
ment which will front Loop 288. He stated the owners
have not found users for this land yet.
No one spoke in favor or in opposition to the request.
Ms. Spivey stated in 1973, the Denton County Electric
Co-op received planned development zoning approval to
permit the location of their office sr.' utility yard
complex on a 20 acre site at the northwest corner of
Loop 288 and Spencer Road. She continued in 1983, the
Co-op received approval of their request to rezone eight
acres of the original tract to permit commercial land
use. The petitioner wishes to rezone the balance of the
original 20 acre tract to permit commercial land use.
She continued, according to the Denton Development
Guide, this site is located !n a high intensity area.
This major activity center has an employment emphasis,
but land use diversity is encouraged. This tires. is
adjacent to the Golden Trianggle Mall center which is
designated as the city's dominent commercial center.
The Development Guide encourages a substantial employee
balance in this area which is intended to provide 600
acres of commercial and ir4ustrial uses representing
over 11,000 jobs. She adit.d commercial zoning is
consistent with these goals and staff recommends
approval.
Mr. Watkins offered no rebuttal.
P 6 Z Minutes
March 13, 1985
Page 7
Chair declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. dscue made a motion to recommend approval of
Z-1728. Seconded by Mr. Juren and unanimously
Lcarried (5-0).
Mr. Pearson returned to the meeting.
D. Consider recommending approval of the petition of
Robert Bell, represented by Burke Engineering, request-
ing a variance of Art+.cle 4,15 of the City of Denton
Subdivision and Land Oevelopment Regulations, with
respect to drainage requirements, on a development
consisting of a one acre tract located on the west
side of Duncan Street between Smith Stroet and Dallas
Drive (V-12).
Ms. Carson stated there were three reply forms mailed
to property owners and none were returnsd.
Mr. Brian Burke stated he is representing Mr. Robert
Bell and has prepared the preliminary pls. . He stated
there is a Lot of water shed up stream from this tract.
He stated there is a lot of water coming from the east
and the west and the developer feels it la not consis-
tent with the magnitude of his project. He stated the
developer is requesting a variance so this tract will
not bear the full brunt of the improvement costs.
On question from Mr. Juren, Mr. Burke stated yes, they
are ledicating a channel right-of-?+ay as improvements.
Mr. Robert Bell stated he was a bit baffled. He said
according to the Subdivision Regulations that develop-
ment on existing lots is encouraged, He stated he feels
625,000 to $30,000 worth of improvements is not encour-
aging. He stated he does have water, sewer, utilities,
curb aaa gutter and he doesn't feel is is his raFson:i-
bility to spend 525,000 to t30,000 that he doesn t hate.
No one spoke in opposition to the request.
Mr. Clark stated the developer fa requesting a vdriannce
of the drainage faculittes, specifically upgrading kox
culverts crossing beneath Duncan Street. He stated it
is his opinion this piece of property does not have the
proper drainage improvements. He further stated this
variance is not supported by the Engineering Depart-
meat. He added the de••,eloper is already being given
some variance by not requiring a channel along the north
rrol3rty line; savings from that release shoulJ be about
17,000 to 610,000, only an easement was requested. He
added with these savings, he doesn't feel the developer
is bearing the full brunt. He continued, the main
requirement was culverts under Duncan Street for the
drainage coming from the west. The drainage from the
south has already been handled by developers in that
area through platting. He added several other devel-
opers are supplylnq escrow fun-is to enable the work I.J
be dons. He concluded by saying preliminary investi-
gations would have shown the property to be at the con-
fluence o: two small creeks with 1100 cfe (cubic feet
per second! total; granting this variance could be
setting s dangerous precedent.
I
On question from Mr. Pearson, Mr. Clark stated if the
variance is granted, we could have some flooding on
Duncan Street which would affect some of the businesses
in that area.
V
J%1ay 1V, 1985
CITI COUNCIL AG%:NDA , r
Er.
F TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE tiTY COUNCIL
FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT:
I
Consider Proposed Contract for Sale of Water to City of Corinth.
RECOMMENDATION
F The Public Utilities board, at their meeting of March 27, 198S9
f recommended approval of the proposed water contract with
rorinth.
f SUMMARY;
The Starf has been working with the City of Corinth in
developing a new water contract. ;xhibit I is the proposed
new contract and Exhibit 11 is the existing contract. The new
contract is formatted slightly different from the old
contract, but most of the issues are the same with some
additions primarily derived from the contract that Dallas
utilizes to sell treated water to its customer cities. Some
issues were added to conform to the terms that Dallas is
imposing on Denton in the proposed Denton/Dallas raw water
contract.
The main issues are:
1. Denton agree. to sell Corinth treated water in greater
volumes and at greater flows than listed in the existing
contract.
2. Requirements for ground and overhead storage are more
explicit and stringent than the existing contract and
conform to requirements that Dallas places on their
customer cities and in accordance with industry standards.
3. Corinth is required to establish specific volumes each
year and must pay for same regardless of use. This is as
per Dallas' requirement on Denton.
4. Rates to Corinth will be established on the utility basis
rather than the cash basis, They will be charged interest
ex nse, depreciation and a return on investment of
imbedded interest plus 1.S1. There will be a demand
3639U:1
1
charge that will relate to fixed costs attributable to
Corinth and based on their peak flow vs Denton's peak
flow. There will be a volume charge that will relate to
variable costs such as raw water costs, pumping costs,
chemical costs, etc. All water sold to Corinth will be
purchased from Dallas. This may result in Corinth's raw
water component of the rate to be lower thj.n Denton's for
( a few years after Ray Roberts Lake is completed since
Dallas' average raw water cost will be le,s than
Denton's. This, of course, will reverse in future years
as Dallas installs expensive pi lines and begins paying
to pump water from Lake Fork and Palestine Reservoirs.
• 5. The term of the contract is 20 years.
6. Corinth may withdraw from the contract after five (5)
years' notice, but may be held liable for any direct or
indirect costs including take-or-pay commitments Denton
has made on behalf of Corinth.
7. The contract will take effect June 1, 1986, except that
the installation of the rate-of-flow controller and the
new rate methodology will not go into effect until either
Corinth completes its water storage/pumping facilities or
June 1, 1987, whichever comes first. Until then, Corinth
will be required to continue paying a summer surcharge to
' compensate for the summer peaking service that Denton is
providing.
BACKGROUND
Denton has had a water sales contract with Corinth since
1971. This contract limits deliverability to 100,000 gallons
' per day and Corinth is now taking over SOO,000 gallons per day
and is not providing their own storage or pumping. They :.ave
plans and specifications to install such facilities, and a
► tentative approval from the Water Development Board for
financing. Final approval for financing is contingent upon
Corinth getting a long-term contract with sufficient volumes
to serve their needs.
PROGRMiS, DEPARTMENTS, GROUPS AFFECTED
i
Denton Water Department and customers, City of Corinth.
FISCAL IMPACT
i
The new contract will provide similar or perhips slightly less
revenues per unit of volume sold than the existing contract,
since Corinth will be furnishing their own storage and pumping
3639U:2
10
r'
at a ixed level rat
serviceso and will be
summer days vs the taking water
on peakingfmode of service.
esent
if
uub ti,
f f ly ed
Prepared by: Res t/
R. E. Nelson C
Director of Utilities Chris Hartung
City Manager
Ap oved:
R, b, , e son
Director of Utilities
{ EXHIBITS I- Proposed Contract
11 Ordinance
III Dallas Conditions of Survice for Treated Wtr INliolesale Customers
} IV Minutes PUB Meeting of
March 27, 1985
I
1
14 I
i
j
r
f
I+639U:3
Y
May 14, 1)85
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
r TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
f
SUBJECT
Consider Engineering Contract with Freese $ Nichols, Inc.,
for High Service Piping Changes for Firm Backwash Water
Capability- CIP 85-WP-7.
RECOMMENDATION
The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of May 1,
1985, recommended approval of proposed engimioering
t contract, (Exhibit II) with Freese 5 Nichols; for analysis,
plans and specifications of alternate firm baccwash water
from high service: piping.
c SUMMARY
Only one pump source of backwssh water vrr:.ently exists in
t the Water Treatmeat Plat L i . ; lt;sh f i ;arc. If this pump,
(30 years old) should e~, fruuld have to shut
down until replacement ur . s. ~Om;lleted. This
onstruction of an alti.i~:'.r bal:.'~aL°~: 9uuri" is urgently
needed to reduce possibility of a r,.,nt shut down.
F
! BACKGROUND
The Water Treatment Plant was constructed in 1955 with
associated backwash pump, valuing and filter piping. On
se,ieral occasions, this pump, now 30 years old, has
required timely repairs which came close to shutting the
entire plant down. The Utility Department has contacted
Freese $ Nichols anJ asked for a proposal (Exhibit I) to
analyze this problem :ind prepare plans and specifications
C for an alternate source of bacfcvash water.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OR GROUPS AFFECTED
` City of Denton, Denton Municipal Utilities, Freese Fa
Nichols, Inc., Water Customers.
r
3640U:1
F'SCAL IM°ACT
The cast of this analysis and plays and specifications is
not to exceed $6,000 and sixty (60) days to complete. This
is an approved FY 85 Capital Improvements Project.
Source of Funds; Bond Funds #623-008-0460-9101-7935
Estimated Construction Cost $46,000
Prepared by: Respectfully Submitted,
Srini Sundaramoorthy
Civil Engineer
Water/Wastewater Department City anager
Approp~
R. eRTon, -P.
Director of Utilitiss
1
EXHIBIT I Proposal for plans and specifications on high service
piping changes for firm backwash water capacity
II Engineering Service Cor.Lract
III Minutes PUB Meeting of 5/1/85
IV Ordinance'
i
3640U:2
1091L
it
NO. _
AN OR.DIN).NCE APPROVING AN AGkEEMr.NT BETWEEN :HE CITY OF DENTON AND . FOR
ENGINEERING WATERETREATMENTLPLANTNCAND PROVIDING FOR ANSEFFECTIVE DATE. TO THE
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Denton
to provide for its future needs for the development and construction
for the water treatment plant; and
WHEREAS, the city staff and Public Utilities Board hes
recommended that Freese 6 Nichols, Inc., consulting engineers, be
retained to render engineering services for relative to the filter
backwash system at the water treatment plant; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36(f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than $3,000,
and
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of tho Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas requires that ever act of tho Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebteu:eas shall
be by ordinance; NOW, THi:REFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the Mayor and City Secretary are hereby authorized and
directed to execute and attest, respectively, the agreement between
the City of Denton, and Freese S Nichols, Inc., providing for
rofessional services comprising of engineering services for
improvements at the water treatment plant under the terms and
conditions being contai:ed in said agreement ::hich is attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION Ll.
That th., ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and r ?oval,
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of _
1985.
~'EY6lf
'TY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ' CITY VY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
I
BY:
I
SIMON W PRESS! PE
Y JAMESA NICHOLS PE
R0E[RT L NICHOLS, PC
r LEEa ►REEEEPC
RORERTS DOOCH PE
F R 6 18 E A N 0 N 1 C 10 S, I .9 C r ROBERT A'THOMPIOM III. P E
JOHN H COOK P E
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S T ANTHONY REIO, ►E
• JO[• MAP FE PE
A ERNEST CLEMENT, P[
` March 25, 1985 ELYFN C COPELAND PC
M GARY N REEVES. P E
r r
' Mr. C. David Ham, P.E.
Assistant Director of Utilities
,ty of Denton
Municipal Building
I' Denton, Texas 76201
I~ Re: Water Treatment Plant Improvements
Filter Barkwash System Proposal
Dear Dave:
t Our proposal of March 14, 1985 for design of a new filter backwash system
for the Denton Water Treatment Plant, was based upon a permanent system
outside the building, near the new High Service Pump Station presently
under construction. It envisioned tapping the existing 36-inch cast iron
high service pipe line and installing a new 20" backwash line up the
embankment, through the pipe gallery wall and tapping into the existing
washwater header in the filter pipe gallery. The new line would have
included a motor operated gate valve for control, a new flow meter for
measuring flow rates and a pressure tegulating valve to control pressure
' for the new supply. Electrical controls for operating the system would
have been installed in the filter pipe gallery, convenient to the filter
operating tables.
i This system would have been a complete parallel system to the present
backwash system and would have provided 100' stand-by' service. The
estimated construction cost of this system was approximately $95,000.00.
On March 23, 1985, Mike Morrison met with Jerry Roush at the Water
Treatment Plant and discussed Jerry's ideas for a less expensive but
workable alternative system. This system would tap the 36-inch discharge
header inside the basement and would extend a new 20 inch wash water
connection across the east end of the basement, inside the building, to
connect into the existing discharge line from the present washwater pump.
A manually operated (rather than remote electric motor operated) valve
would be installed in the line and the system would serve as a manually
operated alternate backwash system. Sketches showing details of this
system are attached for your review. The estimated construction cost of
` this syster,is approximately $460000.00 and our engineering cost estimate
for developing plans and specifications is approximately $6,000.00.
I
If this scheme is acceptable to the City, we would be pleased to enter
` into a contract for the work on the same basis as outlined in the March
14, 1985 proposal, for a "not to exceed" cost of $6,000.00.
all LAMAR ST 11[[7 PORT WORT H. T[ RAS 1a 10E
T E L[ P M O N[ a 1 7 336 • 7161 M E T R O 0 1 7 4 E a I a 0 0
wl
k
1 _
E - ~
Letter to Mr. David Ham
March 25, 1985
' Page Two
Please call if you need additional information concerning this alternate
backwash system.
Very truly yours,
FREESE AND NiCHOLS, INC.
Elvin C. Copeland, P.E.
ECC:kdw
f
E
i
~jQMevc ptrlrr.
1 ~~{elJt7 /~t~S. A,~ro 4
cx~N.~r• ac ''K 3L ito
D•r• TlC,
t
V x-
too mr
•II r
710
1114
"'kill
I _ V Apr 010A ej K 7%
.h ~
i E xis 'og Aump rr-+.S-+I I S{ Ja I
~ .~r..._ ~ i~ -._-•~1 M'n•e ter` 11 -1
~c as
i £/rili~op ~ ~ 20' C~•i n~Pc
Pipe fh3~e I I RE(ocArr. Srales
- `
I ~A`M HANDRAI L Oda PCMC-1111
.-LJ 'f r U...._- ,J~ (fit` i
I I e 0
New HhIPRA~I•
I I S
Brlt1: ~ I f ?1 ~
('!hp wJ a
I I I W~
r---T---i---i ---~----i ± I i i i2 l`J•
I { { I ~ I
rlns d.~i/ch geor
144
i?f,eat i N^~ AoG
n _
I -
CITY OF pENTON- AUXILIARY C3AC1<WASH CONAlccr/ON
1 (JZArJ !~IE_N/
F
Er
r
Qr P6 Wg4
~ ~ o~s~ W Aft
Y . j'/fN/L
WALL Nooo~
j i
i
i
i
~sof~f,eti 1(A-QUE.
E ~
0000
TO y 3 "X 3 "X zo"
S~ C r~o I ' ~
r y
. J f
pegss
va w~
OMp
1.T ILI -
L YE. t r•
Ao-O APO 000^10,14
I } S-arc?zm.✓ Z - Z
E~
f
i
I
r
t
i
I
i
r
I
i vK I L / R/2 y /✓i1 c lc k,~~v C'QNN/-:c"r;"CW
;20 pre li~
Z.b" C~oI
Iota
Cr Mapjol x-00ogrl•.*4l Ta JorAItN
1 ~o a
7vraV ¢'2l IS'a
./1--
00 to %row"
00 0
STATE OF TEXAS )
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
COUNTY OF DENTON FREESE AND NICHOLS; INC.
)
THIS CONTRACT entered into this day of 19 , by and
between the City of Denton, Texas, hereinafter ca ed the owner,
acting by and through Richard 0. Stewart, its Mayor, duly
authorized to act, and Freese and Nichols, Inc., Consulting
Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas, hereinafter called the Engineer.
WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and
agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree
as follows:
1. employment of Engineer: The Owner hereby employs the
Engineer and the Engineer agrees to perform professional services
as herein set forth in connection with the construction of an
alternate filter backwash system for the Water Treatment plant,
hereinafter called the Project.
2. Character and Extent of Engineering Services: The Engineer
shall ren er eng neer ng services or tie development and
construction of the Project, which shall include the following:
a. Desi ns Plans and Specifications: Make field surveys;
review the existing-
x st ng water treatment plant piping and
requires piping for the conversion of the water
distribution system; determine valves and piping
required to reduce the pressure of high service water to
allow it to be used to supply firm filter backwash;
prepare an estimate of probable construction costs for
the project; prepare working drawings and specifications
for the project, prepare forms of proposals; attend
conferences and assist in the coordination of the work
with other interested parties; and assist in the award
of construction contracts.
b. General Ri resentation and Observation during
Construction: a Engineer s a 11 urn s genera
representation and observation of the work during the
construction phaRn as follows: review shop drawings
pursuant to the General Conditions of the Construction
Contract; make two visits per month to site by office
staff; review such work of testing laboratories as may
be required by the Owner; keep the Owner informed of the
progress of the work; issue all instructions of the
Owner to the Contractor; prepare change orders as
required and review the application for payment
submitted by the Contractor. The Engineer shall use
1
reasonable diligence to detect defects and deficiencies
in the work of Contractor and disapprove or reject work
r as failing to conform to the Contract Documents.
Engineer shall not be responsible for the means,
methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of
construction selected by Contractor or the safety
precautions and programs incident to the work of the
Contractor. Engineer shall not be responsible for the
acts or omissions of any person (except his own
employees and agent) at the Project site or otherwise
performing any of the work of the Project.
c. Resident Representation During Construction: If
requeste y the owner, es ent Project Representative
and assistants will be furnished, who will act as
directed by Engineer in order to provide more extensive
representation at the Project site during the
Construction Phase. The duties and responsibilities and
the limitations on the authority of the Resident Project
Representative and assistants, if requested by the
owner, will be set forth in Attachment A which is to be
identified, attached to and made a part of this
Agreement. Construction layout will be provided as a
part of Resident Project Representation.
Through more extensive on-site observations of the work
in progress and field checks of materials and equipment
by the Resident Project Representative and assistants,
rngineer shall endeavor to provide further protection
for Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work,
but the furnishing of such Resident Project
Representation will not make Engineer responsible for
construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures or for safety precautions or programs or for
Contractors failure to perform the construction work in
accordance with the Contract Documents.
d. Subsurface Inresti ations and Laboratory Tests: The
rov e the Owner-with a v ce, when
f ng neer will provide-
requested, with respect to the making of all subsurface
investigations, including borings, test pits, soil
resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explorations,
however, the making of such investigations and the
interpretations of data and reports by special
consultants are not a part of the services to be
rendered by the Engineer, and the cost therefore shall
be paid by the Owner. The Engineer shall monitor and
` review the work of testing laboratories and inspection
bureaus required for the testing or inspection of
materials, witnessed tests, factory testing, etc., for
the Project, but the cost or such laboratory tests or
inspection shall be paid by the Owner.
PAGE TWO
r
Y
i
iL
R
Su
e. To o ra hic Ri ht••of-Wa and Land Surve s: The
ng neer s a ma e.profile an topograp c surveys only
in connection with the location and design of all
structures under Paragraph 2.a.
1
3. Com ensation to Engineer: The Owner agrees to piy the
Engineer or a pro ess ona services rendered under this
contract in accordance with the following:
1
a. Desi ns Plans and specifications and catnons,
i` ~_a r~esentat on: or -Designs, ans an pec
and enera Representation During Construction
(Paragraphs 2.a. and 2.b.), the Engineer shall be paid a
lump sum of $6,000. For the purposes of preparing a
statement, 85% of the fee shall be for designs, plans
' and specifications and 15% of the basic fee shall be for
general representation during construction. Eighty-five
percent (85%) of the fee shall be due and payable upon
completion of designs and the submission of complete
plans, specifications and contract documents to the
I Owner. The fee for general observation services (15% of
the fee) the value shall
the co work ucompletedabye the tconstruction
contractor.
i
b. For Resident Re: resentation and Ins ection During Con-
struct on- ate- onstruct on ayout: For the res ant
representat on ur ng construction and construction
layout, if requested by the Owner (Paragraph 2.c.), the
Engineer sha,1 be paid based on the Schedule of Charges
shown in Attachment B. Payments for Resident Project
Representation and construction layout shall be due and
{ payable upon submission of statements by the Engineer.
I Statements shall not be submitted more frequently than
!1 monthly.
II 4. Preliminary Estimates: When requested to do so, the
iwork, but he doer; noot_g estimates then accuracy construction
the estimates.
5. Revisions of Plans and S ecifications: The Owner reserves
sugigtant a revs n of the plans and
the rig t to 19:0c
specifications after due approval by the Owner as Owner may deem
necessary, but in such event the Owner shall pay to the Engineer
just and equitable compensation for services rendered in making
such revisions. if revisions are required by reason of the
i Engineer error without omission, additional compensation. shall be made by
the
6. Inspection and Review of the Work: The Engineer will
endeavor to protect t e weer aga nst a acts and deficiencies in of th the work of the oi3 Contra borint~rP retationo of It
eo pla sa,tispe ificae
work as it t pro,3resses, by
tions and other contract doctments to and with the Contractor, by
PAGE THREE
the disapproval of defective work and the isst+ance of stop-orders
from the Owner with respect to defective procedures, where they
are observed, and the Engineer will exercise due diligence to
assist the Owner in requiring that the work be done in e.ccordance
with plans and specifications, but the Contractor will remain an
independent contractor with the Owner, and the Engineer does not
guarantee the performance of such construction contract.
7. Ownership of Documents: Drawings znd specifications as
instruments o service are the property of the Engineer whether
I the work on which they are made be executed or not, and the
Engineer will retain in his files original drawings and
specifications for the work. The Engineer will provide up to
I twenty-five sets of plans, specifications and contract documents.
If additional sets are required, the Engineer shall be reimbursed
based on the prevailing commercial rate. Upon completion of
` construction, the Engineer shall revise the working drawings in
` accordance with the date furnished by Contractor to show the
f Project as constructed and the Owner shall be furnished two sets
of prints made from the "Record" drawings.
8. Termination: This Contract may be terminated at any time
by the n er, w`ittFtout penalty or liability except as may otherwise
l be specified herein provided the Engineer will be entitled to
t compensation for work performed prior to termination.
If
9. Arbitration: No arbitretion arising out of, or relating to
this Agreement may include, by consolidation, joinder or in any
other manner, any additional party not a party to this Agreement.
10. Successors and Assignments:. The Owner and the Engineer
each binds himself, successors, executors, administrators, and
assigns to the other party to this Agreement, and to the
successors, executors, adninistrators and assigns of such other
party in respect of all cov9nants of this Agreement. Except as
above, neither the Owner nor the Engineer shall assign, sublet or
transfer his interest in this Agreement without the written
consent of the other.
li. Indemnification: Engineer shall and does hereby agree to
indemnify an o d Tarmless the City of Denton from any and all
damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of
injury or property or third persons occasioned by any error,
omission or negligent act of Engineer, its officers, agents,
employees, invites, and other persons for whom it is legally
liable, with regard to the perforvance of this Agreement, and
Engineer will, at its cost and expense, defend and protect the
City of Denton against any and all such claims and demands.
This Contract is executed in two counterparts.
PAGE FOUR
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, they have executed this Agreement, the day
and year first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Owner
r.
CHARLOTTE ALLEN) T
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
40
ATTEST: FREESE & NICHOLS, INC.
Engineer
! I
E 'rL . MCHOLS -
VICE-PRESIDENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
:)EBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH
a CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
s
i
1091L
PACE FIVE
l
ATTACHMENT A .
r Duties, Responsibilities End Limitations of Authority
f of Resident Project Representative
1
A. General.
• Resident Project Representative is ENGINEER's Agent, will act as directed by and under the supervision or ENGI-
NEER. and will confer with ENGINEER regarding his actions. Resident Project Representative's dealings in matters
pertaining to the on-site Work shall in general be only with ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR, and dealrogs with
subcontractors shall only be through or with the full knowledge of CONTRACTOR. Written communication with
OWNER will be only through or as directed by ENGINEER.
l B. Dulles and Respoulbidtles.
II` Resideat Project Representative will:
f J. ScAtdulev Review We progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions and schedule of values prepared
r by CONTRACTOR and consult with ENGINEER concerning their acceptability.
2. Conferences. Attend preconstruction conferences. Arrange a schedule orprogress ineetings and oll job conferences
as required in consultation with ENGINEER and notify those expected to attend in advance. Attend meetings, and
maintain and circulate copies of minutes thereof.
3. Lialson:
a. Serve as ENGINEER's liaison with CONTRACTOR, working princtp:411y through CONTRACTOR's superinten-
dent and assist him in understanding the Intent orthe Contract Documents. Assist ENOINEER in serving as 0 NNER's
liaison with CONTRACTOR when CONTRACTOR's operations affect OWNER's on-site operations.
b. As requested by ENGINEER, assist in obtaining from OWNER additional detain or information, when required
at the Job site for proper execution of the Work.
4. Shop Drowinla andSampies:
a. Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples, receive samples which are furnished at the site
by CONTRACTOR, and notify ENGINEER ortheir availability fir examination.
b. Advise ENGINEER and CONTRACTOR or its superintendent immediately of the commencement of an Work
requiring a Shop Drawing or sample submission if the submission has not been approved by ENGINEER.
3. Review of Wort, Refection of Defective Work. Inspertkmi and Tests:
a. Conduct on•siteobservations of the Work In progress to assist ENGINEER in determining if the Work is proceeding
Ir accordance with the Contract Documents and that completed Work will conform to the Contract Documents.
b. Report to ENGINEER whenever he believes that any Work is unsatisfactory, faulty of defective or does not
conform to the Contract Documents, or does not meet the requirements of any inspections, tests or approval required
to be made or has been damaged prior to final payment: and advise ENGINEER when he believes Work should be
cvrnected or rejected or should be uncovered for observation, or requires special ;oiling, inspection or approval.
e. Verify that tests, equipment and systems startups and operating and mainteaence Instructions are conducted as
required by the Contract Documents and in presence of the required personnel, and that CONTRACTOR maintains
adequate records thereof; observe, record and report to ENGINEER appropriatedmails relative to the test procedures
and startups.
d. Accompany visiting Inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the project, record
the outcome of these Inspections and report to ENGINEER.
a 1979 by National Society of Professional Engineers. 20:9 K St.. N.W.. WashinJton. D.C. MM
NSPFJACECIASCF. PuNication No. t910.1•A '
Igr7 HJirion
10
6. lnterprrtation 01ronr6es Aorumraw Transmit to CONTRACTOR ENGINEER's clarification,; and interpretations
of the Contract Documents.
7. blod,Jications: Consider and evaluate CONTRACTOR's suggestions for modifications in Drawings or Specifications
and report them with recommendations to ENGINEER.
d. Records.
a. Main's'n at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job conferences, Shop Drawings and samples
submissions, reproductions of original Contract Documents including all addenda, change orders, field orders, addi-
tional Drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract. ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations
of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and other Project related documents.
b. Keep a diary or log book, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of extras
or deductions, list of visiting officials and representatives of manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers and distributors,
daily activities, decisions, observations in general and specific observations in more derail as in the case of observing
test procedures. Send copies t3 ENGINEER.
c. Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all CONTRACTORS, subcontractors and major suppliers of
• materials and equipaseat.
9. Report:
a. Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports asrequired ofprogressoftheWork anti CONTR %CTOR's compliance with the
approved progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing submissions.
b. Consult with ENGINEER in advance of scheduled major tests, inspections or start of important phases of thr
work.
c. Report immediately to ENGINEER upon the occurrence of any accident.
10. Payment Requisitions: Review applications for payment with CONTRACTOR for compliance with the established
procedure for their submission and forward them with recommendations to ENGINEER, noting particularly their
relation to the schedule of values. Work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not incor-
porated in the Worx.
11. Cerrjjicetes, Malnttnance and Operation Manuals: Durir the course of the Work, verify thatcertifiales, maintenance
and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and furnished by CONTRACTOR are applicable to
the items actually Installed; and deliver this material to ENGINEER for his review and forwarding to OWNER prior
to Anal acceptance of the Work.
12. Completion:
ra. Before ENGINEER issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion, submit to CONTRACTOR a list of observed
items requirinj completion or correction.
b. Conduct Anal inspection in the company of EVOINEER. OWNER and CONTRACTOR and prepare a Anal list of
items to be completed or corrected.
c. Verify that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to ENGINEER
concernins acceptance.
C. l.lmketlons of Authority.
Except upon written Instructions of ENGINEER. Resident Project Representative;
1. Shall not authorize anydeviation from the Contract Documents or approve any substitute materials or equipment.
2. Shall not exceed limitations on ENGINEER's authority as set forth In the Contract Documents.
1. Shall not undertake any of the respon%ibilitiesofCONTRACTOR, subcontractors orCONTRACTOR'ssuperintendent.
or expedite the Work.
4. Shall not advise on or issue directions relative to any aspect of the menss, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures of construction unless such Is speciAtalty called for in the Contract Documents.
1. Shall not advise on or issue directions as to safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work.
6. Shall not authorize OWNER to occupy the Project in whole or in pan.
7. Shall not participate In specialized Meld or laboratory tests.
r ~rrre b ay..n' b+r CwAnen o.r.~.M. faun •
r1i1GJ.NpWhh: Pnhn.,rlaryiiwnYM.W hxikr.~rr.enr.'w~d,MN.e:Md Vie, rrr~r•orr~uMall~t.nHn.AnrMwt•s~J~lr~nren r•wa~lAmtr►•r.fawn
erO.,i ~.rww
ATTACHMENT B
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
Schedule of Charges
Special Services
f" Staff Members Salary Cost Times Multiplier of 2.2
Salary Cost is defined as the cost of salaries of engineers,
draftsmen, stenographers, surveymen, clerks, laborers, etc., for
time directly chargeable to the project, plus social security
contributions, unemployment compensation insurance, retirement
E benefits, ,aedical and insurance benefits, bonuses, sick leave,
vacation and holiday pay applicable thereto. (Salary Cost is equal
to 1.39 times salary payments. This factor is adjusted annually.)
Other Direct Expense Actual Cost times Multiplier of 1.00
Other direct expenses shall include printing and reproduction
expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and
subsistence away from Fort Worth and other miscellaneous expense
directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory
analysis, tests, and other work required to be done by independent
persons or agents other than staff members.
E
Public Utilities Board Minutes
Ma/ 1, 198E
Page 2
Ham briefed the Board on this item. Fie indicated that we
would gain from building the line with the bid from the
DFW Utility Company for $6,490.00. The bid is $3,OOD
above the projected cost, however.
Coomes expressed concern if we could afford to proceed
with the project estimated $3,000 over the projected
cost. Ham affirmed that we could.
tCoomesm
val. Second.
torrthe City aComotion uncil to accept
Motion carried.
4. CONSIDER ENGINEERING CONTRACT WITH FREESE AND NICHOI
t7-VT7TN'G- 111L!11 J1 E"'
WATER CAPABILITY-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 85-WP-7
Nelson reconfirmed the concern that there is only one pump
source of backwash water presently in the Water he Treatme.?it
Plant to flush filters. If this pump fails, would havc~ to shut down until replacement or repairs are
modifica . Testimatedmata$bb00porrected by doing a piping
Coomes made a motion to recommend to the City Council
Freese and Nichols complete the project with the
60 daystto ncothat mplete}.e Second tby could Boyd. noMotionecarried 0 and
S. CONSIDER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT (CIP) 85-WW-6
Ham briefed the Board on this item. He indicated that an
existing 8" sanitary sewer was found during construction
of the lift station interferring with the proposed
foundation. It is, therefore, necessary to relocate the
lift station to the north and wrst on the existing plot to
ease out unforeseen construction problems. This is a no
cost change ordor.
Coomes made a motion to accept the Hobson Lift Station
Chan pge Order and recommend to
Second by Herring. e MCity Cuncil otion carried?proval of
the
6. DISCUSS PRELIMINARY 1985-86 UTILITY DEPARTMENT OPERATING
BUDGET.
Nelson recommended i•e place this item of the agenda on
hold.
DATE: May 1"4, 1965
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOi Mayor and Members of the City Council I O ' :3~,
FROMr G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
r
SUBJECT: PONE CONTRACT FOR LANDFILL SOILS TESTING
I
RECOMMENDATIONi
The staff recommends adoption of the ordinance approving the agreement between the
City and Rone Engineers for the subsurface investigations ano evaluation of the
landfill bottom.
`:UMMARY:
The attached proposal from Rone Lngineers outlines the ve:rious functions and cost
associated with the testing and evaluation. Since the misting pit at the landfill
is partially filled, It is necessary for us to seek certification of the landfill
bottom liner from the Texas Department of Health. The criteria for such certifica-
tion is identical to the methods and procedures contained in the proposal. We will
be unable to move into the new disposal pit until this testing is complete and
certification is obtained.
j BACKGROUND:
None
i
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTF.Dr
E
Srlid waste Disposal
I
I
FISCAL IMPACT: j
i
The cost estimate for this work should not exceed $6,000. All costs will be charged
to the La.^.Afill Bond Account.
' Respectfully submitted:
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared ays
Bill Ange
Assistant Director of Public Works
Approved by:
I
Bill 'Angolo~
Assistant Director of Public Works
C sw7
~1
0885L (44L)
1089L
i
Er
I'
NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND
BONE ENGINEERS TO PROVIDE SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION SERVICES FOR
THE CITY'S SANITARY LANDFILL, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 2.36(f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
$3,000, end
WHEREAS, Section 2.09 of the Charter of the City of Denton,
Texas requires that every acs of the Council providing for the
expenditure of funds or for the contracting for indebtedness shall
be by ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
` SECTION I.
That the City Council hereby approves and authorizes the Mayor
and City Secretary to execute and attest, respectively, the
e agreement between the City of Denton and Rone Engineers, providing
for Subsurface Investigation Services for the City's Sanitary
' Landfill under the terms and conditions being contained in said
agreement which is attached hereto.
i
` SECTION II.
` t
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
a its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
198:1.
I
i
RICHARD U-79TEWn-,-RM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
KMLOTTE A CITY OF TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
rn u~ uy
t
rZone Engineers 11308 Emerald Streel
Geolechnical Consuitants O-ilas, Texas 75229 RO~gineers
Materials 'resting (214) 241-4517 Metro 263.1555
April 10, 1985
Proposal 3-14
City of Denton
Department of Public Works
• 901 Texas Street
Denton, Texas 76201
8[ I%WACE INVESTIGATION
EVALUATION OF LANDFILL BDITCM
CITY OF DEN`CN UWFILL - PERMIT NO. .1590
DENBON, TEXJsr4
Gentlement
We are pleased to submit our proposal for conducting the subsurface
investigation in conjunction with the referenced project. This proposal is
based on our com,erstion of March 27, 1985 with Mr. Joe tebaue, and on the
application permit authorized by the Texas Department of Health.
Soil borings were drilled at the site for the initial "Soil and Liner
Evaluation Report" (SLER)p dated February 13, 1985. Results of that study
indicate additional fill volume
may be achieved by over excavation and
recorrWtion of the underlying clay soils. The entire area investigated was
about 320 by 400 feet. The SUR certified an area of 200 by 400 feet. A
lined sidewall area, approximately 500 feet long, exists along the north
prop,-.y line. The lined sidewall area begins 50 feet east of the 200 by 400
feet certified area. It is recommended that the entire 500 feet of sidewall
be lined at one time. Consequently, the next SLER should oertify an area
approximately 650 by 400 feet. The following proposal and cost estimate is
based on this 650 by 400 feet area.
Based on past experience with this project and requirements outlined in the
permit application, we anticipate the subsiurfaoe conditions to consist of
clays? sandy clays and sands of the Wooa4ine Geologic Formation.
Accordinglyr the costs shown for this proposal are based on boring depths of
25 feet below existing gradesr and the anticipated soil condition. The final
invoice will be based on the specific quantities drilled and tested. If
unanticipated conditions are encountered during drilling, you will be notified
accordingly.
FIELD INVESTIGATION
We plan to define the subsurface conditions with a total of 24 sample borings
drilled to depths of 20 to 25 feet below existing grades,
F
City of Denton
Proposal 3-14
April 10, 1985
Page Two
All borings will be drilled using truck-mounted equipment. Cohesive and non-
cohesive soil samples will be obtained using three-inch diameter Shelby tube
samplers and two-inch diameter standard split-spoon samplers, respectively.
All samples will be extruded in the field, logged, checked :or con3istency
with a hand penetrometer wrapped to preserve their condition, and returned to
the laboratory for further testing.
1
I
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
Based on our experience of the soil conditions and general geology in the
area, it is anticipated that laboratory tests will be required to classify the
soils, and determine the permeability characteristics. It is therefore
anticipated that the following tests will be required:
1. Moisture content and soil identification;
2. Sieve Analysis (through #200 sieve);
F 3. Liquid and Plastic Limit determinations;
4. Moisture Content and Unit Weight determinations; and
5. Permeability tests.
EN01NEERING SERVICES
F The results of the field and laboratory data will be submitted in an
engineering report together with our analyses of the results and
recata ndations. The report will includes
1, general soil and groundwater conditions in the area;
2. recammanded depth for bottom of landfill;
3. earthwork recommendations; and
4. any other geotechnical requirements revealed by these studies.
ANTICIPATED COST FOR SERVICES
We will perform the services in accordance with the attached schedule of fees.
Based on the above quantity of work and the attached achedule, the total cost
of this investigation should be on the order of $5,900.00 to $6,000.00. For
budget purposes, a maximum cost of $6,000.00 is recommended. This cost will
rot be exceeded without prior authorization.
We can begin theac studies within 5 days of receipt of notice to proceed,
weather permitting, and we anticipate 2 working days to complete the fiel%
investigation. The final report should be submitted 2 weeks following the
completion of the field phase of our investigation. Preliminary design data
can be made available sooner if necessary.
Pone Eng nears
I
r
City of Denton
1 Proposal 3-14
April 10, 1985
Page Three
't'hank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. Please sign and
return one copy'as your authorization to proceed.
` We look forward to working with you on the project. If any questions arise,
do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
RONS INE AOCEPM
BY
A;~
~
Ronal F. ed, P.E.
Vice-President, Engineering DATE
KAK/AWawm
copies sukmittedi (2)
i
t
I
I
l
I
I
I
t
Rone Engineers
r
COST ESTIMATE
EVALUATION OF LANDFILL BOTTOM
CITY OF DENTON LANDFILL
DEN", TEXAS
This oust estimate is based on an evaluation of a 650 by 400 foot area.
Sariple borings will be drilled on a 100 foot grid system, as specified in the
permit application. Borings will be dr illed to a depth of about 25 feet.
Sample borings will not be drilled along the north property line which will be
lined.
Field Investigation
Mobilization of drill equipment, location of borings,
observation of post-drilling water levels - lump sum $ 150.00
126 Linear feet of core borings (continuous sampling)
in soil @ $12.50/foot $ 11575.00
324 Linear feet of auger borings @ $6.00/foot $ 11944.00
Subtotal, Drilling $ 3,669.00
Laboratory Investigation
f
2u Moisture Content b Soil Identification @ $3.50/each $ 70.00
10 Sieve Analysi3 (through 4200 sieve) @ $20.0 /each $ 200.00
j 10 Liquid and Plastic Limit determinations @ $30.0 /each $ 300.00
10 Moisture Content- and Unit Weight determinations
@ $11.00/each $ 110.00
8 Permeability tests on undisturbed soils @ $50.00/each $ 400.00
Subtotal, Laboratory $ 1,080.00
Engineering Services
Engineering Analysis and Report - lump sum $ 700.00
10 Hours Site Engineer @ $:0.00/hour $ 500.00
Subtotal, Engineering $ 1r200.O6
)TAL $ 51949.00
Total estimated cost is $5,900.00 to $6,000.00. Unit prices shown are
applicable through August, 1985. The final invoice will be based on the
specific quantities and tests performed.
Rorie Engineefs
I
DATE: May !y, 1985
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT l /
TOr Mayor and Members of the City Council
i
FROMi G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJEC'Pr AIRPORT USE AGREEFSb'NT FOR THE 1985 AIRSSSOW
RECOMMENDATION:
The Airport Advisory Board and the City Staff recommend the adoption of the resolu-
t1on approving an Airport Use Agreement between the City of Denton and the Confeder-
ate Air Force for the 1985 Airshow.
SUMMARY:
The attached contract is similar to those approved by the Council in previous years.
The contract obligates the City to allow the Confederate Air Force to use the Airport
during the Airshow, as well as obligating the City to provide necessary firefighting
equipment and personnel, ambulances, and other standard equipment. In return, the
Confederate Air Force has agreed to provide the City with $3,000 base fee plus 3% of
all admission fees after excluding cost of police salaries, cost of the Blue Angels
and Golden Knights, and any compensation, required by the holder of the Airport
Agricultural Lease.
BACKGROUND:
No additional background information.
i
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED
I
1 -
l
Denton Municipal Airport
Denton Police Department
Denton Fire Department
Denton Street Department
Denton Sanitation Department
FISCAL IMPACT:
The profitability of the airshow for the Airport is nominal. The total cost of the
airshow to the City is estimated at $5,500 and revenues are projected at $6,500.
Overall, t;. airshow is of substantial benefit to many local businesses including
motels and restaurants as the airshow brings in significant tourist trade during the
weekend of the show.
Respectfully submitted,
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared b,.,:
Bill Aneo
Assistant Director of Public Works
Approved by:
Bill 4ngelo
Assistant Director of Public Works
R-" S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton owns property at the Denton
Municipal Airport; and
WHEREAS, the Confederate Air Force desires to use property at
said airport for a temporary sirshow on June 7, 8 and 9, 1985; and
WHEREAS, the Airport Advisory Board has reviewed and recommended
approval of the attached use agreement; :NW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, CHAT;
SECTION I.
The Airport Use Agreement between the City of Denton and the
Confederate Aic Force, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, is hereby approved.
SECTION 11.
The Mayor is hereby l,uthori¢ed to execute the attached use
agreement on tehal: of the aty.
SECTION III.
This Resolution shall bi effective immediately upon its passage
and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.
KLL;HAJW I
.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
VETS-AI. ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BYs
AwmwA~
10
THE STATE OF rESAS § AIRPORT USE AGREEMENT
COUNTY OF DENTON §
This Agreement, made and entered into by and between the City
of Denton, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Texas, herein-
after referred to as "Cit~I and Confederate Air Force,
after referred to as "CAF'), is made for the purpose of allowing
CAF to use the Denton Municipal Airport (hereinafter referred to
as "Airport") owned by the City, for a temporary airahow in
accordance with the following terms:
pp1. CAF may use the Airport on June 7, 8 and 9, 1985, for the
property of the general irport
)M ioses of c. CAF may fuse airshow for
for said airahow as designated by the Airport Manager.
2. The City will also provide the following equipment and
services in support of said airahow:
(a) Two fire trucks and two man crew and one fully
equipped ambulance and one transer ambulance;
(b) One water truck, a front-end loader and one equip-
ment operator;
(c) t. minimum of fifteen (15) sanitation containers
plus two (2) 30 yard containers which will be
emptied a minimum of two times, after 6:00 p.m. on
June 7 and June 8, 1985 and during the morning of
June 10, 1985; and
(d) Up to four (4) electrical drops, three (3) of which
shall be from existing poles.
3. CAF, in consideration of the foregoing, agrees as follows:
(a) To pay to City Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000).
(b) To pay, after subtracting the following costs:
(1) payment of Blue Angals and Golden Knights,
(1) payment for Mr. Trietach's wheat; and
(3) payment for police officers and police reserve
officers during air show.
three percent (3i) of all admission fees collected.
(c) To provide the City with evidence of comprehensive
public liability insurance inthe amount insure
Million Dollars ($5,000,000) per occurrence,
the City and CAF against all liabilities or
losses arising from any bodily innury or propasrtyy
damage occurrence suffered by any pet-son
result of the use, occupancy or operations of the
CAF at the Airport;
CONTRACT/CONFEDERATE AIR FORCE/PAGE 1
E'
C
Er_
r
(d) To restore and repair any damage or loss suffered
improvements
th operations
thereon he Airport grounds, tse, u ancy
caused by
of the CAF;
(e) dTo cause the eposited on Airport apropertyl as latresultr of trash
airshox; and
at any reasonable time to audit to the airshow
(f) To allow the City
records of t of ad
to deter admission fees.
to determine City's percentage
1985.
Executed this the day of
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY
I ~
1 i
ATTEST:
i
CITY OF DENTON,~TEXAS
i
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
I DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHs CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Z ri!'i~res~es- ' f
~ BY* CONFEDERATE AIR FORCE
I
ATTEST:
CONTRACT/ CONFEDERATE AIR FORCE/PAGE 2
Page 2
Minutes
Airport Advisory Board
[4. The Board considered recommending to the City Council the approval
of a resolution accepting the Airport Use Agreement with the
1 Confederate Air Force for tre purpose of staging an airshow. A motion
1 was made and seconded to recommend approval of the resolution and
r lease agreement as writes. The motion carried unanimously.
I` 5. The Board considered recommending to the City Council adopting an
ordinace temporarily allowing one-way traffic along Airport Road
I during the airshew. A motion was made and seconded to recommend
to the City Council the adoption of the ordinace as written. The
motion carried unanimously.
6. The Board met in executive session to discuss legal and real estate
matters at 9:45 P.M. The Board reconvened in open session at 10:50 P.M.
With no further business, the Board adjourned at 10:50 P.M.
h
I I
f
It i
fr`
I
DATE: 5-/f85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT IJ~~
f0: MfAyor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Etesolution authorizing a Pipeline License Agreement
between the city of Denton and the Missouri-Kansas
Texas Railroad U~mpany
REC014MENDATI11:
Staff re,..:-cmends approval.
WIMAR Y:
This license will allow the city to cross the R"ilroad's
right of way with a stonn sewer pipeline.
BACKGROUND:
The reques!'~ is a rcyuiremnt for the Robertson Street
Improvement: Project as designed.
i.
f PROGRX S~L DEPAR, NTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED.
Tre nigineerinq section of Public Storks will handle
all the vork required with the license
E
# FISCAL FIPACT.
The CaTrrunity Developrent Flock Grant fund will pay
the licensinq fee. Tne.re is no impact on the
Cr~neral fund.
I
Respectfully subm tted:
City Manager
Prepared by:
Name. ElizabethEvans
Title Community DeveloFment Coordinator
Approv
Name Jeff yer
Title Director of Plannirq 5 Canikanity Developwnt
1066L
R E S O L U T I O N
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON:
The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute on
behalf of the City of Denton, Texas, a Pipeline License Agreement
dated May 1, 1985, between the City of Denton and the Missouri-
Kansas-Texas Railtoad Company, relating to the construction,
reconstruction, use, mainteesgnce, operation, repair and
i instel.ation by boring method one pipe line encased in a carrier
I
~ pipe not exceeding eighteen (18") inches in diameter, to be used
for storm sewer, manhole and headwall at Mile Post K-722.120
Denton County, Texas.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
9
i
CITY OF DENTON,TEXAS
ATTEST:
MARY
CRARLOTTE CITY OF D-NTON,~'.EXAS
i APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY.,
~I
li
I
A
roan +w
Rev it 77
r
` PIPE LINE LICENSE
THIS AGREEMENT No- made this let may of . Nay _ 19_..8.1.
between the MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY, hereinafter called "Licensor", and
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
t hereinafter called "Licensee".
K'1TNESSETH:
ARTICLE I.
I
1. Term: This agreement shall take effect the date hereof, and unless sooner termi-
nated as provided herein, shall continue in force so long as used for the purpose herein
set out for s. period of ten (10) !ears, or until terminated by either party giving the
other party not less than thirty (30) days' advance notice in writing of an intention to
terminate the same, the agreement to terminate upon the expiration of such term or notice,
whichever oexurs first. Licensee is hereby given a renewal option at a price and term to
f be negotiated oo sooner than 120 days or less than 30 days prior to the expiration of this
term. In the event the amount of renegotiated rental is not agreed to in writing by both
parties, prior to the expiration of the term of this license, this license shall automati-
cally terminate without notice, effective the last day of the expiring term.
I
2. Consideration and Description In cc, -;deration of _ ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FT.FTY
i AND N0/100--------
(S 1,,,50.09 1 DOLLARS
j receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and of the covenants of Licensee as hereinafter set forth. Licensor hereby grants a license
any permission to Licensee to construct, trconstruct, use, maintain, operate, repair and install by boring- method.
one pipe lines(s) encased in a carrier pipe not exceeding eighteen 1 18 inches in diameter, to be
used for storm sewer, manhole and headwall
across or
along Licensors property at or near, Denton +n the Count% of Denton
and State
Texas of_ For convenience. the said pipe line is hereinafter referred to as 'Crossing". The location of said
Crossing is more particularly described as follows:
All as shown on print of Licensor's Drawing
No. A-31,0629 Engineering Department, Denison,
'i+.xas, dated April 2, 1985, marked Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
f ARTICLE 11,
Licensee undertakes and agrees:
l! I. Specifications: To install said Crossing according to the specifications of the American Railway Engineering
Association Part S, Pipelines. The Crossing shall be laid and maintained at the sole cost of Licensee, and in a manner and with
material satisfactory to Licensor's Chief Eneineer, with its top at least five and one-half (5;j j feet beneath the base of the rail under
the track, and at least five and one-half(5-1/2) feat below the surface of the ground
elsewhere, so it will not interfere with the safe operation of said railroad or cause
damage to Licensor's property. Said pipe line shall be encased in a larger pipe where it
passes under any railroad track, and for at least twenty-five (251) feet on each side of
the center line of any such track.
t 2. Present Occupants: To make appropriate arrangements with any person or legal entity occupying
I`r affected hereby pursuant lo a lease or other permission granted by Licensor, so that Licensee's said Crosing will not unreasoably
interfere with the use of the subject property, or create undue hardship on the person or legal entity occupying the premises.
3. Liability: Licensor shall not be liable for any damage to said Crossing or the contents thereof, howsoever such damage
shall be caused, whether by the negligence of Licensor, its agents, employees, or otherwise,
t, Licensee assumes the risk of, and shallprotecl, indemnify and hold harmless Licensor from and against all liability rotor
on account of injury to or death of any and all persons or damage toproperiy, including livestock killed orinjured, resulting from
or incident to the construction, maintenance, use, operation, relocation, reconstruction orexistence of said Crossing on Licensor's
f premises, or the removal thereof from said premises, or to the restoration of or failure to restore said premises to their prior or
other condition as herein provided, whether such injury, death or damage shall be caused or contributed to by the negligence of
Licensor, its agents, employees or otherwise, and Licensee will protect, indemnify and hold harmless Licensor and any others
` legally using its right of way, from all claims, demands, suits or actionsgrowing out of any such loss, injury or demands, including
I investigation costs, court costs, and attorneys' fees resulting or in any manner arising from the risks herein assumed by Licensee.
Licensee further agrees to immediately investigate any such claims, demands, or suits and shall defend, settle, and lor otherwise
dispose of the same at its sole cost and expense. In the event Licensee settles any such claims, demands, or suits, it shall obtain a
f release which igcludes Licensor.
Licensee shall not have or make against Licensor any claim or demand for or on account of any damage Licensee may
suffer or sustain because of any failure of Licen-or's title to the right of way and lands occupied by said Crossing or any part
thereof.
4. W&I%tr: To waive all right to question the validity of this License or any of the terms or provisions hereof, or the right
or power of Licensor to execute and enforce the same,
i
r
ARTICLE 111.
It is mutually agreed by and between the parties, as follows:
I.(a1 Repairs and Relocation: Licensee will at all times maintain the Crossing in a safe ind secure manner, and in a
condition :isfactoryto Licc nso r.Licensorma yrequestLicensee tochangethe lo:ation of the Crossing,oranypa rtthe reof,orto
make reasonable repairs as in the judgement of Licensor shall be deemed necessary to avoid interference with or danger in the use
or operation of Licensors railroad, or any of its present or future appurtenances, or telegraph, telephone, signal or other lines on
Lice nsor's right of way, a nd in the event it is found necessary for Licensor to use its entire right of way, or any portion of it occupied
by the Crossing. Licensee shall at its sole expense, and within thirty(30) days 0•:rnotice sotodo,(orupon shorter notice in case of
emergenc) remove said Crossing, or as much of the Crossing as is located upon that portion of the right of way so required by
Licensor.
(b) If Licensee shall fail to perform any of its obligations contained in this agreement to the maintenance of safe
conditions in and about said Crossing or as to the protection of wires from electrical interference on Licensor's property or to make
any necessary repairs, or to relocate said Crossing, then Licensor may cause such condition to be made safe, orchange of location
to be made, or repairs to be made, or Crossing to be removed from Licensor's property, Licensor acting as the agent of Licensee,
and may perform such work as is necessary in the judgement of Licensor, and Licensee shall, on demand, promptly reimburse
Licensor the whole cost thereof, plus ten ( [Wc) per cent thereon as a charge for supervision, accounting, and use of tools: or
Licensor may terminate this License by giving to Licensee not less than ten (10) days' advance written notice of its intention so to
do.
2. Termination: Licensor may terminate this License upon ten (10) days' written notice if Licensee fails to keep any of
Licensee's covenants herein contained, or if the right of way is required for other purposes by Licensor, and no reimbursement
shall be made for Licensee's expenses incurred i.i the removal of this crossing or the consideration paid for this License. No
termination orexpiration shall affect the rightsi nd liabilities, if any, of the partieshereto then existing,
3. Restoration: Unon the termination of this agreement, whether in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph I of
Article I. or Paragraph 2 or, of Article 111, or otherwise, Licensee shall promptly remove said Crossing from Licensor's right of
way, and restore said right of w ay to its prior condition, or to a condition satisfactory to Licensor. If Licensee shall fail to remove
said Crossing within thirty (30) days after the termination of this agreement, Licensor may remove the same, and charge the
expense therefor to the Licensee on the basis provided in Paragraph 1(b) of Article 111.
-2-
4. Miscellaneous: (a) This License and all of the provisions herein contained shall be binding upon the parties hereto,
their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, and Licensee agrees to supply notice in writing to Licensor of any
name changes. Licensee agrees not to assign this License or any interes! +herein, without the consent of Licensor in writing, and any
and every such attempted assignment without such prior written cvaient shall be void and of no effect. In the event of any
assignment, Licensee shall at all times remain fully responsible t,nd Iia'+le for the payment of there ntal, if any, herein specified and
for the compliance of all of its other obligations under the term!, p ,visions, and covenants of this License.
(b) In the event rent is paid annually, Licensor expressly reserves the tight to increase the above rental rate on any yearly
anniversarydate of this license by giving Licensee thirty! O)days'written notice. Licensor may increase the rental by the
percentage that the Consumer Price Index has increased, published by the Department of Labor, since the last rental
increase period, or the last anniversary date hereof.
The persor.al pronouns used herein as referring to Licensee shall be understood so to refer to Licensee whether
t Licensee be a rn aural person, a partnership, or a corporation, or any combination thereof.
C (d) Any notice herein requ'red to be given by Licensor to Licensee shall be deemed property given if served upon or
delivered to Licensee or his authorized agent, or if potted on or if mailed, postpaid, addressed to Licensee at his last
known place of business.
1. (e) No oral promises, oral agreements, or oral warranties shall be deemed a part of this License, norshall any alteration,
amendment, supplemenr, or waiver of any of the provisions of this licensebe binding uponeither party hereto unless the
same be supplemented, altered, changed, or amended by an instrument in writing, signed by Licensor and Licensee.
(0 This License does not become binding upon Licensor until executed by Licensor's vice-president.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreementasof thedayandyearfirstabovewritten.
MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY
By
Vice-Presidew
i
C '
CITY OF DOTON, TEXAS
i
` i
{ l
By
Title Mayor
Address: 215 E, McKinney St.
Denton, Texas 76201
File: T-18753-B
.3-
' /
Q.y h
r7l5A CS4?~4%K r C P
f
5
~~Z" ~~/~~/ke-ten
rosw W0000, 6b.
5 City ors' ~n~bn
a? fell',
t
t~ t ~ ~ ~°a~'r~ End✓rx~r~p G~.~` rXe~a
t
6
311SS0U1T•1{ANSAS-'I'r•.xne RATLTTOAD COMPANY
C REAL ESTATE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPART61ENT
r 701 COMMERCE STREET
DALLAS, TEXAS 75202
' (211} 6516751
April 3, 1985
Files 1-18753-B
Mr. Jerry Clark
I 1
` City of Denton, Texas
215 E. McKinney St.
Denton, Texas 75201
Re: Pipe Line License covering one 18-inch
storm sewer pipe line, manhole and headwall
at Mile Pont K-722.12 in Denton
Dear Mr. Clark:
A Pipe Line License has been prepared in reply to your request to cross our
property at the above-referenced location.
1
In order to complete this License, we need the following:
1. All three (3) copies of the License, signed by the Mayor or other authorized
city official.
i
2. A copy of a Resolution from the city council authorizing the Mayor, or other
' official, to execute the License For the city.
3. Remittance in the anount of the enclosed billing.
Also, be sure to forward the enclosed Contractor's reement and instructions to
the contractor who will be doing the actual ~installation work. The Contractor's
Agreement is a ~separa~te contract betv.een the Railroad and the contractor, and it
must also be comp-Teedbefore work can proceed an Railroad property.
As soon as the signed Pipe Line license copies and your remittance are received,
the License will be reviewed by the various railroad departments. Upon signa-
ture by our vice-president, one fully-executed License copy will be returned to
you.
Your careful attention to the above details will help avoid any time-consuming
delays in commencing the installation of the pipe line on railroad property.
Sincerely
Jdh Seidner
Right of Way Contracts Manager
214/651-6763
JS/ba "R 8 S98S
Enclosures
plc
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
D
Debra Adami Drayovitch, City Attorney
Joe D. Morris, Assistant City Attorney
Robert B. Hunter, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: April 29, 1985
TO : Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council
FROM: Debra A. Drayovitch, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Senate Bill 1257 amending the Code of Criminal Procedure
f
Recently, Senate Bill 1257, amending Sections 15.06 and 15.07 of
the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, wits introduced in the
Senate. The purpose of this Bill is to allow state wide
execution, by Texas peace officers, of warrants issued by
P municipal judges. The purpose of this legislation is to clarify
ambiguities in the existing law which provide that arrest warrants
issued by any magistrate, except mayors or recorders of any city,
I` extend to every part of the State. At present, the law requires
that if a warrant issued by a mayor or recorder is to be served
out of county, it must first be endorsed by a Judge of a Court of
Record. The situation arose inadvertently in 1977 when the
Legislature amended the Code to provide that a recorder shall be
construed to bo a judge of the Municipal Court.
The difficulty with the existing law is that if an arrest is made
outside the county where the warrant was issued, and the warrant
has not been endorsed by a Judge of a Court of Record, the arrest
could be construed to be invalid. The Denton Municipal Judges and
the majority of municipal judges in the state are not judges of a
court of record. Quite often, our police officers arrest on the
basis of outstanding warrants in Dallas County or other Texas
counties, and such arrests could lead to a potential liability
situation and/or a dismissal of the criminal charges.
Several attorneys have already filed claims against the cities of
Irving and Dallas. Specifically, William E. Trantham has filed a
claim against the City of Irving in the amount of $10,000 for his
client who was arrested through the execution of one of these
warrants that resulted in his lient's false arrest and
imprisonment. The proposed Senate Bill would cure the issues
raised by Trantham by deleting the term "recorder" from the
exception listed in the Code of Criminal Procedure.
I'
I
II
Honorable Me,yor & Members of the City Council
April 29, 1985
Page Two
Attached for your review is a copy of Senate Bill 1257. My
conversations with other City Attorneys, as well as Judge Watt and
Assistant Judge Whitten, leave me to strongly recommend that the
Council adopt the attached Resolution. The City Attorney and the
Municipal Judge of Irving have worked with Senator Bob McFarland
of Arlington to support the passage of this amendment. Also
attached is a resolution expressing your support of this Bill. I
would respectfully recommend that you adopt same. Should you have
any questions relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
{a
DEBRA A. DRAYOVUNK
DAD: js
xc: Chris Hartung
Judge Watt
Assistant Judge Whitten
Police Chief Hugh Lynch
z
i
f~F
I
R E S 0 L U 'f I O N
WHEREAS, Senator Bob McFarland has introduced Senate Bill 1257
in the Texas Senate relating to the amendment of Sections 15.06 and
' 15.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (C.C.P.); and
WHEREAS, the exact meaning of Sections 15.0E and 15.07 C.C.P.
I~
is presently somewhat confusing by reason of the definition of the
term "recorder" in Article 1L96 of Vernon's Annotated Texas
Statutes (V.A.T.S.); and
1 WHEREAS, the possible conflict between Sections 15.06 and 15.07
t i
C.C.P. e-.s Article 1196 V.A.T.S. raises questions as to whether
'f warrants issued by municipal court judges can be executed by peaca
officers statewide; and
WHEREAS, if warrants executed by peace officers statewide are
defective, crimes committed by individuals chile being arrested
under such warrants may not be subject to prosecution; and
I
WHEREAS, the amendment of Sections 15.06 and 15.07 C.C.P.
` proposed by Senator McFarland, if passed by the Texas Legislature,
will resolve any possible conflict that exists between such
sections and Article 1196 V.A.T.S.; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of Senate Bill 1257 by the Texas
Legislature will conclusively show that it is the law of the State
of Texas that warrants issued by municipal judges can be executed
by peace officers statewide; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of Senate Bill 1257 is supported by our
Municipal Judge, the Alternate Municipal Judge and the City
Attorney's Office; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THL ;ITY OF DENTON, TEJiAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The City Council recommends the adoption of Senate Bill 1257 in
the form as the same was introduced in the Texas Senate by Senator
Bob McFarland.
PACE 1
It 19
SECTION II.
A copy of this resolution be furnished by the City Secretary to
r Governor Nark White, Lt. Governor Bill Hobby, Speaker of the House
Gib Lewis, Criminal Justice Committee Chairman Kent Caperton, said
Committee's Vice Chairman Bob McFarland, said Committee's Members
Senator Ray Farabee, Senator Bob Glasgow, Senator Ted Lyon, Senator
H. Tati Santiesteban, Senator Craig Washington and to State
Representative Jim Horn and State Representative Ben Campbell.
SECTION 111,
This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its passage
and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of _r, 1985.
1 i
RICWD 0. r
f S YOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
i ATTEST:
f
CITY OF DENTON,,TE" S ECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
1 OPU
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
PACE 2
l
By S. No
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
1 AN ACT
2 relating to the authority of a municipal court judge to issue an
3 arrest warrant for a person in another county.
4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
5 SECTION 1. Article 15.06, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1965,
i
6 is amended to re Ad as follows:
7 Art. 15.06. WARRANT EXTENDS TO EVERY PART OF THE STATE. A
a warrant of arrest, issued by any county or district clerk, er by
i
i 9 any magistrate (except mayors der--reeerderml of an incorporated
r
10 city or town), shall extend to any part of the State; and any peace
11 officer to whom said warrant is directed, or into whose hands the
E 22 same has been transferred, :.all be authorized to execute the same
13 in any county in this State.
14 SECTION 2. Article 15.07, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1965,
is is amended to read as followsr
16 Art. 15.07. WARRANT ISSUED BY OTHER MAGISTRATE. When a
i7 warrant of arrest is issued by any mayor let-reeerder) of an
1B incorporated city or town, it cannot be executed in another county
i? than the one in which it issues, except:
'0 1. It be endorsed by a judge of a court of record, in which
21 case it may be executed anywhere in the State; or
22 2. If it be endorsed by any magistrate in the county in
23 which the accused is found, it may be executed in such county. The
24 endorsement may be: "Let this warren: be executed in the county of
6984950 GWK-D 1
I Or, if the endorsement is made by a judge of a court
2 of record, then the endorsement may bei %et- this warrant be
•
3 executed in any county of the State of Texas". Any other words c:
4 the same meaning will be sufficient. The endorsement shall be
5 dated, and signed officially by the magistrate making it.
6 SECTION 3. The importance of this legislation and the
7 crowded condition of the calendars in both houses create an
9 emergency and an imperative public necessity that the
r 1 9 constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several
j 10 days in each house be suspended, and this rule is hereby suspended,
11 and that this Act take effect and be in force from and after its
12 passage, and it is so enacted.
G
i
V
69R4950 GNK-0 2
i
Johnstor•i, 'Larson & Trantham
ORNEYS AND COUNSELORS
Elmbrook Gorden Offke Bultdlno
t2t34 Elrnbrook Drive. Sutte 443 James A. 3ohnslon
Dallas, Texas 75247 Douglas P Larson
214/631.2933 Bill Tronthom
Ruth A Azen
September 17, 1984
City Secretary
City of Irving
Irving, Texas
Re: Deborah Underwood
Dear Sirs:
Hy client was arrested August 26, 1984 in the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County. Texas as a result of your warrant 1 344359-1-4 FTA.
I
Such warrants were uncertified by a court of record pursuant to 15.U7
of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
As a result to such illegal arrest my client has suffered damages for ~
r c false arrest, imprisonment, pain and suffering in the sum of $16,000.0^.
Please send your check to the undersigned.
Respectfull
illiam E. Trentham
Attorney at Law
SEp 19 1994
Of f lCf Of Cgj SECRET pRY
k
A
-at owed
1086E
D.
i R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, Article 2.0116.(a) of the Texas Election Code provides
that, subject to r,rtain limitations, every general (regular) or
special election held by the state or by any city of the state must
be held on one of the following dates: the third Saturday in
January, the first Saturday in April, the second Saturday in August,
or the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November; and
WHEREAS, Section 3.01 of Article III of the Charter of the City
of Denton provides that thn regular election for the choice of
members of the City Council shall be held on the first Saturday in
April; and
WHEREAT, often times, the first Saturday in April immediately
precedes Easter Sunday, thereLv conflicting with Easter weekend and
reiigious and holiday plans and infringing upon the ability of the
electorate to cast their votes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas would
urgg. and recommend the introduction of legislation to amend Article
2.0Ic of the Texas Election Code to provide that when the first
Saturday in April falls on Easter weekend, the election shall be
held on the second Saturday in April; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
That the City Council recommends the introduction of legislation
to amend Article 2.Olb of the Texas Election Code to provida that
where the first Saturday in April falls on Easter weekend, the
cities shall conduct the election on the second Saturday in April.
SECTION II.
t That a copy of this resolution be furnished by the City
Secretary to Governor Mark White, Lieutenant Governor Bill Hobby,
Secretary of State Myra A. McDaniel, Speaker of the House Gib Lewis,
Senator Bob Glasgow, Senator Ray Farabee, Senator Bob McFarland,
State Representative Jim Horn, State Representative Ben Campbell,
Dick Willis, Director of the Texas Municipal League, and the House
of Representative Election Committee: Representative Clint Hackney,
Chairperson; Representative Chip Staniswalis, Vice-Chairperson;
Senfronia Thompson, Chairperson for Budget and Oversight; and
Committee Members Representative Jim Horn, Representative Sam
Russell, Representative Steven Carriker, Representative Nolan J.
Robnett, Representative Bill Carter, and Representative Pete Laney.
r SECTION III.
That this resolution shall take effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
RICHARD 0, STEWART, 14AYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLENg CITY SECRETRY
CITY OF DEbTGN, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, T XAS
BY:i
E
r R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, more than 14 million people in Ethiopia and the rest
f of the African famine belt live on the brink of starvation; and
' WHEREAS, the survival of millions of children acid their
parents depends on imaed'.ate food aid to these drought-stricken
areas; and
I WHEREAS, Texas is a land of agricultural bounty and warm
generosity whose very name was derived from an Indian word, Tejas,
• meaning friendship; and
I
WHEREAS, surplus grain and powdered milk are stored in
elevators and warehouses all over Texas and can be purchased for
approximately $3.50 a bushel; e,+d
WHEREAS, Texas farm and ranch organizations, in cooperation
with the Texas Department of Agricultural and Save the Children
Federation, are asking the people of Texas to contribute toward
! purchases of Texas grain and powdered milk to alleviate the
j suffering of Africa's starving millions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, THAT:
SECTION I.
The month of May, 1985, shall be "Project Tejas Month" in the
City of Denton, Texas, and the Council does hereby urge all
+ citizens to contribute $35.00 each, the equivalent of 10 bushels
of grain, or whatever they can afford and send to: PROJECT TEXAS,
Texas Department of Agriculture, P. 0. Box 12009, Austin, Texas
78711.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 23rd day of April, 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
0KA i Vr r ATTORNEY
CITY OF DEN1ON, TEXA
A ay 14, 1985
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEA
TO: AAYOR & ;4E4BSRS OF THE CITY COU14CIL
FROA G. Chris Hartung, City 4anager
i
SUBJECT
Consider Capital Improvements Plan Project (CIF) #85-WW-6
Hobson Lift Station- Change Order #1, Bid #9351.
RECOAAENDATION
• The Public Utilities Board at their meeting of April 24,
1985, recommended to the Council that this change order #1
be approved for a time extension only- no cost to the City.
! SUAA ARY
Freese & Nichols, Inc., the Consulting Engineers, have
submitted a change order requesting the followings
I
To relocate the Hoba~in Lane Lift Station to the north an
wart on the existing plot to ease out unforeseen
construction problem.
i
BACKGROUND
The bid for this project was opened December 11, 1984, and
the Public Utilities Board and the City Council approved
I the award of the contract to the lowest bidder, Weitzel
` Construction Co., Inc.
C The construction began January 1985. During excavation, it
was found that an existing 8" sanitary sewer was
interferr,ng with tho proposed foundation, hence the
request for this change order to relocate the lift station
eithin the existing lot.
PROGRAKS,_DEPAftrA ENT 04 GROhPS AFFECTED
City of Denton, Denton Aunicipal Utilitiea, Freese &
Nichols, Inc., the Contractor.
3639Us1O
FISCAL LAPACT
Original contract amount $218,500
Change Order #1 increase/decrea:ae $0
Revised contract amount $218,500
Net increase in contract time
of completion 30 days
Revised contract time of July 15, 1985
completion
Prepared by: Bespeotfully Submitted,
Srini undaramoorthy r ar ung
Civil Engineer
Water/Wastewater Department City Manager
Approved:
R. E. Nelson, P.E.
Director of Utilities
i
EXHIBIT: I Change Order 8 location map from
Freese 8 Nichols, Inc.
II Change Order Approved by FBN, Inc., and the
Contractor
III Ainutes PUB Aeeting of .x/1185
3b39U:11
f
r
1
i
SIMON W FRCCSC RC
JAMES R NICHOLS ►E
ROBERT L NICHOLS ►C
Ltd B FRCCSE ►E
p s ~i p ROBERT B 6000H A[
f B 5 8 i ` .1 D ► F l r ~j Y s, F I C JOE PAUL JONES R C
ROBERT A THOw►~ON III ►E
JOHN N COOK ► L
[F C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S T ANTHONY Ruo ► E
C JOE B MACS R
W ERNEST CLEMENT ►C
ELVIN C COFtLANtl ►C
GARY N PELVES ►E
March 25, 1985
Mr. C. David Ham, P.E.
Assistant Director of Utilities
City of Denton
Municipal Building
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: lobson Lane Lift Station
Contras,-t No. 9351
Change Order No. 1
Dear Dave:
I have attached a copy of the proposed Change Order No. 1 for relocating
the Hobson Lane Lift Station to the north and west on the existing plot.
This change order is being transmitted to the Contractor for his review
and comment. It is my understanding from previous discussions with Tom
Weitzul that the change order will be done with no change in contract
price.
We would like to point out that in order to relocate the proposed lift
station as shown on the attached change order drawing:
1. The footing line of the proposed lift station will be outside the
existing fence and the walls of the structure will abutt the
fence.
2. The construction of a second discharge line from the pump station
can be accomplished within the 8-foot spacing between the fence
and the face of the structure, however, the 18-inch DI stubout for
a future connection will need to be relocated to the west of the
proposed structure.
3. The relocated lift station has less room to maneuver maintenance
vehicles than the previous location, however, we do not feel that
mobility for normal width vehicle, will be overly difficult.
4. A new location will have to be determined for the service pole
which feeds power into the lift station site. It is suggested
that the proposed lift station layout be reviewed with Mr. Tulles
so that he may select the location which will best accommodate
incoming power lines to the lift station.
6 II L A M A R S T R C C T F 0 A T W O A T N, r E E A i 7 6 1 0 2
7 E L C► N 0 N C 0 1 7 3 3 6 • 2 1 6 1 14 C T R 0 8 1 7 4 2 9 1 9 0 0
Letter to C. David Ham
March 25, 1985
Page 2
Please let me know if this change order meets .pith your app oval so that
we may proceed with the processing of the change order. If you have any
questions or ,eed any other information, please give me a call.
Very truly yours,
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC.
Coy M. V ir'h, P.E.
CMV: jd
Enclosure
xc: Weitzul Construction, Inc.
j
i
it
J
I
r'
Edge of Pavement _
r
Exist_,/i_Force in
I - -
i
}Iax>19
i
SidewolK
r
l
I
- - - - - - - - - - - -
iasLlIn - -
` Yocabol iJ r
(suCo. 1 Proposed /
` 4~ SL.w~ I Llet Station /
(r E !
S v ou e (-4 1
I Wall •Po0tIns
~ I
a/atlny I jo)"
y over flow
# I DM 64Oro9
CHAA/GE ORCeie #i
MARCH 20 1965
CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK ORDER
i
PROJECT: Hobson Lane Lift Station
CONTRACT: #9351
OWNER: City of Denton, Texas
CONTRACTOR: Weitzul Construction Inc.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE: March 22, 1985
CHANGE OR EXTRA WORK TO 0E PERFORMED
Relocate lift station to North and West as shown on the attached
drawing, including changes in length and direction of piping enter-
ing and leaving the lift station, revised locations of Manhole No. 2,
and gravel road surfaces.
:
i
. ~ I
Previous contracr amount $218,500.00
Not(increase)(decrease)in contr;,cl amount 0.00
Revised contract amount $2189500.00
Not(increase)IJA&VIR"in contract time of completion 30 Days
RMvised contract time of completion July 1985
Recommended by Approved by OWNER
FREESE AND NICHOLS
/
By _lf By
f~
DldAbvfkn:
j Approved by CONTRACTOR t-Omer
I co"Ireclor
I - F. L K Moo
I-ter. EM.
BxJdt. IGA'orce Main - - -
~+r,•
' SldewalK
Raltt~.~ G,i Lea
r
Ex~ IS tin~
rd$ M r,--------~ +
?4100.o1o
Gas Co I Propposed
9t l~ew) I L /ft ✓R'ta t%On
u ou a J
Wa I/ roo t7,,- I
s!s t1~9 I
9C a t/OR
~ ~/ft st~tl
L---ci -
P/uy JO'
Ovdrf/ow
M N _
DM 84069
CHANGE ORak
1d4RCH 2O0, 1945
i
Public Utilities Board Minutes
May 1, 1985
Page
Ham briefed the BoaA on this item. He indicated that we
would gain from building the line with the bid from the
DFW Utility Company for $69490.00. The bid is $3,OOD
above the projected cost, however.
' Coomes expressed concern if we could afford to proceed
with the project estimated $3,000 over the projected
cost. Ham affirmed that we could.
Herring made a motion to accept the bid and send the item
to the City Council for approval. Second by Coomes.
Motion carried.
4. CONSIDER ENGINEERING CONTRACT WITH FREESE AND NICHOLS
WATER CAPABILIT Y-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 8S-WP-7
Nelson reconfirmed the concern that there is only one pump
source of backwash water presently in the Water Treatment
Plant to flush filters. If this pump fails, the plant
would have to shut down until replacement or repairs are
completed. The problem can be corrected by doing a piping
modificatit estimated at $6,000.
Coomes made a motion to recommend to the City Council
Freese and Nichols complete the project with the
stipulation that the project could not exceed $6,000 and
60 days to complete. Second by Boyd. Motion carried.
i
S. CONSIDER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT (CIP) 85-WW-6
Ham briefed the Board on this item. He indicated that ark
existing 8" sanitary sewer was found during construction
of the lift station interferring with the proposed
foundation. It is, therefore, necessary to relocate the
lift station to the north and west on the existing plot to
ease out unforeseen construction problems. Thi-k is a no
cost change order.
Coomes made a motion to accept the Hobson Lift Station
Change Order and recommend to the City Council approval of
the proposal. Second by Herring. Motion carried,
6. DISCUSS PRELIMINARY 1985-86 UTILITY DEPARTMENT OPERATING
BUDGET$ - J
Nelson recommended we place this item of the agenda on
' hold.
i
I
r