HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-15-1985
CITY COVAtC14L
A6EMDA
of - /5- 85
~ ~ .i k,, r r~ R r , r ; y 4V _Y Ff r w.i k ;,J)i ` 7a n'
•~9 nrlYE+i+dnlsy 3 x .x.44
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON•CITY COUNCIL
January 151, 1985
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
January 15, 19850 at 5:30 p,m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
11 Presentation of the management letter from Arthur
Andersen and Company, City of Denton auditors.
2. Approval of proposed sign ordinance provisions.
3. Executive Session:
A. Leggal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17
Y.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
Y.A.T,S,
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 Y,A.T.S.
D. Board Appointsents Under Sec. 2(9), Art
6252-17 A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
January 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of December 18, 1984 and tt~, Special Called
Meeting of January 3, 1985.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these Items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the city Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations,
A, Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda, Detailed
back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
4,A and 4,B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance,
~ ~ ~ ,Y ty.``P '"7s 'i:- ,yr K" a ~ a• ~a~ '..r a + K,. e q pig,
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 15, 1985
• Page Two
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
11 did # 9377 - Motor controller
2. Bid f 9379 - Steel retaining wall
3. Bid 0 9381 - Modular furniture for Accounting
4. Bid i 9386 - vibratory rollers
5. Purchase Order 0 66190 to Boyd Excavation in
the amount of $7,020.00
6. Purchase Order f 66666 to Boyd Excavation in
the amount of $7,020.00
3. Public Hearings:
A. Z-1705. This is the petition of Myers
Development Corp3ration requesting an amendment
of planned development (PD-12) on an
approximately 78 acre tract located on the west
side of Interstate 35-E approximately 2,500 feet
south of State School Road. The currently
• approved planned development permits the
following uses: Hotel and R,staurant Site,
Office Site, Recreation Area, Cultural Center
The proposed amendment includes the t^llowing land
uses:
Cluster Homes - approximately 80 units on 13.2 acres
with a density of 6 units per acre
Single Family - approximately 21 units on 5.2 acres
with a density of 4 units per acre
Commercial Shopping - approximately 44,5 acres
Multi-Family - approximately 360 units on 15 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
(The Planning and Zoning Commission rocommends
approval.)
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the award of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services ; providing for
the expenditure c.f funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date
B. Consider adoption' of an ordinance for the
. ex enditure of funds for emergency purchases of
ma trials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting su4h purchases from requirements of
competitive bids; and providing for an effective
date.
it L~. tl ,~{~y.Nr„ ~.y iwd 94 tl .,R.t: ?~-t 'x 1`A5! . ~~.^p r.y' Ili Mph ,tl Y!"'"y: ,~'.p i P tl..s_e} 1. rF
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 15, 1985
Page Three
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district to '6he commercial (C) district on two
tracts totaling 18.8 acres located on the west
side of Loop 288 approximately 2500 feet south of
East McKinney Street (FM 426) (Z-1692).
D. Consider adoptioi of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 128 acre tract located
adjacent and east of FM 428 (Sherman Drive) and
adjacent and north of Kings Row and the Cambridge
Square Subdivision (Z-1696).
E. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) classification
to the light industrial (LI) classification on a
1.9 acre tract located on the west side of Bonnie
brae Street, approximately 1000 feev south of
Nillowwood Street. (Z-1599).
F. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the
• planned development (PD) district on a 243.3 acre
tract located on the north side of 1-35E,
approximately 1800 feet east of Loop 288
(Z-1703).
G. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the
planned development (PD) district on a 57 acre
tract located on the east side of Loop 288,
approximately 2 200 feet north of I-35E.
(Z-1104).
H. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change of
zoning classification from multi-family (MF-1) to
general retail (GR) on a tract of approximately
0,5326 acres situated north of and abutting
Londonderry Lane and west of and abutting Jason
Drive (Z-1707)6
1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a changge of
zoning classification from multi-family (MM) ) to
general ret-til (GR) on a tract of 0,674 acres of
land situated north of and abutting Londonderry
Lane and east of and abutting Jason Drive
(Z-1708).
J. Adoption of an ordinance approving historic
landmark (H) designation at 213 East oak Street
(H-33).
r
t x r w aw `d ~ ,r, . , ++1. ,y a„¢a. ,"4:.. i~ y,rs • -'a n,, n
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 151 1985
Page Four
5. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution supporting
Section 312 Rehabilitation Program of the
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
B. Consider approval of a resolution, to amend F-51
lease at the Denton Municipal Airport. (The
Airport Advisory Board recommends opproval.)
6. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Avondale Addition, Section•111, Block G. Lots 17,
18 and 19. (The Planning and Zoning Commission has no
recommendation,)
7. Consider appointment of a Jeputy City Secretary.
8. Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
8. Real Estate
C. Personnel
D. Board Appointments
9. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the Cit Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the Yk- day of 198 at _21 3 _ o'clock
_fY
1626C
'14 W t Alr; Y'
t l v tl{. Y o~5.
AGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
January 15, 1985
Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
January 15, 1985, at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
5:30 p.m.
1. Presentation of the management letter from Arthuo,
Andersen and Company, City of Denton auditors,
2. Approval of proposed sign ordinance provisions.
3. Executive Session:
A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-1'1'
Y.A.T.S.
B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17
Y.A.T.S.
C. Personnel Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 Y.A,T.S.
D. Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art
6252-17 Y.A.T.S.
Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday,
January 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Building at which the following items will be
considered:
7:UO p.m.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of December 18, 1984 and the Special Called
Meeting of January 3, 1985.
2. Consent Agenda:
Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and
approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the
Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda
authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff
recommendations.
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for
payment kinder the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed
back-up in,`ormation is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items
4.A and 43). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda
to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval
of the ordinance.
.y rr
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 15, 1985
Page Two
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
1. did f 9377 - Motor controller
2. Bid # 9379 - Steel retaining wall
s. Bid f 9381 - Modular furniture for Accounting
4. Bid f 9386 - Vibratory rollers
5. Purchase Order f 66190 to Boyd Excavation in
the amount of $7,020.00
6. Purchase Order 4 66666 to Boyd Excavation in
the amount of 37,02O.OU
3. Public Hearings:
A. Z-17U5. This is the petition of Myers
Development Corporation requesting an amendment
of planned development (PO-12) on an
approximately 18 acre tract located on the west
aide of Interstate 35-E approximately 2,500 feet
south of State School Road. The currently
approved planned development permits the
following uses: Hotel and Restaurant Site,
Office Site, Recrep'.lon Area, Cultural Center
The proposed amendment incluces the following land
uses:
Cluster Homes - approximately 80 units on 13.2 acres
with a density of 6 units per acre
Singh: Family - approximately 21 units on 5.2 acres
with a density of 4 units per acre
Commercial Shopping - approximately 44.5 acres
Multi-Family - approximately 360 units on 15 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
(The Planning and Zoning Commission reconmends
approval.)
4. Ordinances:
A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting
competitive bids and providing for the :ward of
contracts for the purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services ; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing
for an effective date.
d. Consider adoption of an ordinance for the
expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of
materiais, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the provisions of state law
exempting such purchases from requirements of
competitive bids; and providing for an effective
date.
yr is S.
w
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 15, 1985
Page Three
C. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
district to the commercial (C) district on two
tracts total Ioig 18,8 acres located on the west
side of Loop 288 approximately 2500 feet south of
East McKinney Street (FM 426) (Z-1692).
D. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a
change in zoning from the agricultural (A)
classification to the planned development (PD)
classification on a 128 acre tract located
adjacent and east of FM 428 (Sherman Drive) and
:adjacent and north of Kings Row and the Cambridge
Square Subdivision (Z-1696),
E. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) classification
to the light industrial (LI) classification on a
1,9 acre tract located on +he west side of Bonnie
Brae Street, approximately 1,000 feet south of
Willowwood Street. (Z-1699),
F. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the
planned developmen'. (PD) district on a 243.3 acre
tract located on the north side of I-35E,
approximately 1,800 feet east of '.oop 289
(Z-1103).
i
G. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change in
zoning from the agricultural (A) district to the
planned development (PD) distract on a ;7 acre
tract located nn the east side of Loop 2886
approximately 2,200 feet north of I-35E,
(1-1704).
H. Adoption of an ordinance approving a change of
zoning classification from multi-family (MF-1) to
general retail (GR) on a tract l>f approximately
0.5326 acres sf:uated north of and abutting
Londonderry Lane and west of and abutting Jason
Urive (1-1707),
1. Adoption of ar. ordinance approving a change of
zoning classification from multi-family (MF-1) to
general retail (GR) on a tract of 0.574 acres of
land situated north of and abutting Londonderry
Lane and east of and abutting Jason Drive
(Z-1708).
J. Adoption of an ordinance approving historic
landmark (H) designation At 213 East, Oak Street
(H-33).
r f #.:'gy •r .8 rdo f r~ ~ T~?''\~... ;a 1' T n r~ .,y + ~ T •a~,•-- , ~ .F r ~--r~---.^~_-• .
City of Denton City Council Agenda
January 15, 1985
Page Four
5. Resolutions:
A. Consider approval of a resolution supporting
Section 312 Rehabilitation Prograr of the
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
B. Consider approval of a resolution to amend F-51
lease at the Denton Municipal Airport. (The
Airport Advisory Board recommends approval.)
b. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Avondale Addition, Section 111, Block G, Lots 17,
18 and 19. (The Planning and Zoning Commission has no
recommendation.)
7. Consider appointment of a Deputy City Secretary.
81 Official Action on Executive Session Items:
A. Legal Matters
B. Real Estate
C. Personnel
0. Board Appointments
9. New Business:
This item provides a section for Council Members to
suggest items for future agendas.
C E R T 1 F 1 C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1964 at o`clock
(a.m.) p.m.
CITY SECRETARY
1625C
NUMMIL
~py~+ i~ + + d~.~~ „ L,j~ I+J n. •k''`~ 'h rP'S _ µ a°4°{ 1'x'7 .1+i E:1 ,~7 r 4F'i
DATE: 1/15/85
50* 3 c
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of proposed sign ordinance provisions
RECOMMENDATION: Approve proposed ordinance as written
SUMMARY: Continuation of discussion
BACKGROUND: Three years of research and development
PROGKAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Building Inspection, Planning and Community
Development, Beautification Committee and
community
FISCAL IMPACT: None on general fund
Respecul sub i ed:
4 a e
~Ghris Hartung
City Manager
Prepa ed
Jeff
ey
Director of Planning
and Community Development
Approved:
e ~
s
City Manager
k_
DRATT NO I • ARIL 30, 1984
NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE EXISTING ARTICLE 17 AND OTIM PRO-
VISIONS RELATING TO SIGNS AND REENACTING A NEV ARTICLE 11 OF
APPENDIX $-ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS TO PROVIDE FOR TIM REGULATUNO OF SIGNS AND THE
PERMITTING THEA OF PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWO
HUNDRED DOLLARS (S 00.00) FOR VIOLATIONS THMZOF; PROVIDING FOR
A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR Aft EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the Cicy Council of the City of Denton finds that
the regulation of the size, location, height, use, maintenance,
construction and placement of signs and other outdoor advertising
davieba and structures is necessary to prevent impediments and
dangers to drivers and pedestrians upon and along City $treat$,
sidewalks and easements; and
.."dEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds chat
.no use of signs and other outdoor advertising tavicas and
structures, if unregulated, can, oecausa of their meter,
placement, and enaracteristics, adversely effect property fah-e.;
aestnecically damage the overall environment; treats an
unfavorable business climate Vhich hampers attempts cc .:tract
and retain desirable commercial sad business anterprises; and
foster conditions that lessen the enjoymen: and desirability of
the City of Denton as a place in which co visit, live and -.ark;
and
WHEALEAS, the City Council of the Cit.: of Den:an ends tnac
portable or mooila signs present spacial traffic hazards wnan
t4wad or. public streets or displayed on or along public ri;nt-
of-ways; act as impediments to ehs eifee:iw hems of ::.a police
and first deparcaents in ptrforjing el.eir data; iresent :angLrs
to :ha haalth, safety and general welfare of cne :ici:sns of :ha
:::y 2! Denton because of their mobility. :heir propels::y :e oe
blz n about if not properly ar.caorad, and, tf l:incad, ftrosene
special nacar.s of site:rical use not sound :n ocner signs, and
V.1i1REAS, Texas Revised Civil icatuca Article '14,83
spacifically snumerstas to one of at pcvsrs possessed by t.ia
PAGE 1
City of Denton is the authority to relulate, license and control
or prohibit the erection of signs and billboards;
NOW, THEREFORE. THE COUNCIL OF THt cm OF DENTON HEREBY ORDA WS:
SECTI(IN I.
That Article 17 of Appendix A-Zoning of the Code of Ordi-
nonces of the City of Denton is hereby in all things repealed.
SECTION II.
That a new Article 17 of Appendix s•Zooiag of the Code of
Ordinances of cre Cicy of 5acton is hereby adopted :o hereafter
read as follows:
ARTICLE 17. S:GN REGULATIONS
A. Gene:tl Provisions
1. Purpose i Intent
2. Defiritions
3. Signs Not Regulated
4. ?ronibiced Signs
3. Adninistration 6 Enforcement
?or-.Its
C. Portable Signs
j Zagu:acion of S£yns by Zoning Districts
E. ;elulatto, of AtteChed Signs
F. Abandoned Signs
special Provisions
1. Manner of Xeasurement
2. Setback Clearance Zone
Signs on Certain Hilnways
Clearance from Electrical Lsaes
5. temporary b ?olicical iiins
6. Sign Maina~nanc•
7. Identification of Signs
H. ',iineonfor2ing Signs
i. Special Exeeptions Allowed
3. Historical Landmark Signs
Conflicting ?revisions
A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. F'J"O se and Intent. It is the pur,,ose of this Article to
regulate the eonstru::ioa, erection, PIAee2ent, :aint4MAtCOr use
and removal of private silos within cne City of Denton, Texas.
PAGE 2
~'4 . ; a i`k ~ ~ .r d "'r , • F ~ " •;n.,~ ll f. F ,kr
It is the intent of this Article to regulate signs generally
by classifying each silo according to its design and construction
and by regulating, based on such classifteacton, the type,
number, site, height and setback of signs according co location
in the various toning dtsrricts.
It is also the intent and daterminacEon of the City Council
that :hose relulatinas be and are the minimum necessary and least
burdensome to accomplish the purposes heretofore a.tced.
2. Definitions. The following words, as used in this article
o: Article It shall have the meanings -espectively ascribed to
them, as follows:
(a) "Advartisin " small moan to seek the attraction of or
to direct the attention of the publitc co say location,
goods, services, or merchandise whatsoever.
(b) "Dusiasss Purposes" shall mean the erection or use of
any property, building, or structure, p4 manoat or
temporary, for the primary purpose of conducting is
:aid building or structure or on said property a
's itimate commercial aacarptise in cJmpliance wi:..h
i1 ordtain.es and regulations or tn.i ci-y c±
governing such acti%tty. Dusine.s rurp;se sn::'. roc
include any property, building, or structure a:a.red
or used for the primary purpose of securiag a permit
to erect a sign.
(c) "Curb line" shall mean an imaginary line drawn along
the outermost par,., or back of the curb and gutter on
either side of r public streat, or if to curb and
gutter exist, slong the outermost portion of the
pavement, or, if no pavement exist, slong the ad a of
the traveled portion of the roadway.
(d) "fffoctiva area" means the area enclosed by :ae
minUun imaginary rectangle at ver:lcal and hors:cntal
lines which fully contains sal extramicies of a sign
(or signs), exclusive of its supporting scrlc:ate.
This rectangle is to be calculsced atom an ortnogtapain
projection of t1e sign viewed nori:ontally. A view-
point for this projection is to be taken which gives
the largest rectangle of cnac kind, a: tae viewpoint
is rotated horisontally around tna sign. If elssants
of ebe sign are movable or flexible, as a Cal or
string of lights, the measurement mall be taken wren
the elements ars fully extended and parallel to the
plane of view.
(a) 'Not-Residential Zoniml Distri:t" means any z:hin
district as sh,owneonathe o~fic:alsianin~g d:aLrict -map
of tae City of Denton.
(f) "Owner" Miami a person wno nas legal title, con:rag ar
possession of property.
(g) "Premists" shall seen a loco pt:;el or tract of real
property as shown on a plat apprbved In accotdance
with lsw and riled with the County Clark's Officd or
PAC[ 3
•~ea~rire
1 r YY ~n lf' Yea '..^ry i,y t i•~- 9P/,~f:.. ~ii; 1}d cr
4 ~~t ~ if Kip i Y' d
All unplatted tract of land as conveyed by deed or
operation of law and recorded in the official records
of the County Clerk's Office.
(h) "Residential ioniag 'District" means anq toning
district des noted ae an A SF-70 SF-10, SF-13,
SF-160 2-F, M -R, MF-1 or 'Mr-I district as shown on
the official xoniag district map of the City of Deacon.
(i) "Side Ysrd Setback Lines" mean the imaginary lines
drawn parallel to the side yard lot line or property
lines on a premise which deliaaate the minimum
required side yard areas for that premise.
(j) "Sign" shall mean any device, flag, lignt fixture,
picture, letter, word, message, symbol, plaque, wind
device, or poster visible from the premises on which
it is located or from any public street and designed
to inform or attract the acteneioo of persons not on
chat premise, excluding those searchlights and
landscape fixtures which display no words or symbols
and those works of art which display to words or
additional symbols.
For pureoses of this Article, or Article 7, ;articular
types signs are further defined herein as ollows:
(1) "Abandoned Sign" shall mean an on-premise sign
advertising an activity, business, service or
merchandise which was at one time,, but is no
longer, located on the premise.
(1) "Attached Sign" shall mean any sign attached to,
applied on or supported by, any ?art of a building
(such as a wall, roof, window, canopy, awning, or
marquee) which encloses or covers usable space.
wall signs, roof signs and projecting signs shalt
be considered attached signs.
(J) "Dilapidated or ^eteriorstsd Sign" shall mean a
sign:
(as) Where elements of the surface or ?sckssround
can be seen as viewed irom the normal Tr-fiag
distance (intended viawing distance), to gave
portions of the .inisned zatarl4l or paint
:f, or missing, ar otherwise
flaked, :token *!fl"
not in harmony with the -sst of tae surface,
or
(bb) Where he structural support or frame members
are visibly bent, broken, dented, or torn; or
in the
(cc) case of wood nand is A.imiiar visibly cracked or
in such a way as to constitute an unsightly
or harmful condition; or
(dd) Where the sign cr elenencs of it are twisted
or loaning or at angles other than those at
which it was originally ereccad (such as may
result from beirg blown or the failure of a
structural support); or
(ea) Where the message or wording can no longer be
clearly raid by a person wiCI.t normal eyesignt
under norasi viewing Caaditiens.
PAC[ 4
r f•, r q a s 5 F K .?r' n, ,w` tt +r, a' S. T• g M'
, 1 1
(4) "Ground S£ga" sna11 seen a sign whose principal
support is provided by burying, anchor in or other-
vise connecting the sign, or supporting structure
thereof, to the ground in such a manner as not to be
easily or quickly removed or relocated, and which is
not a stake sign, portable sign or attached sign.
i`r' shall mean any sign advertising a
(S) "Off-Premise S .
business, activity, goods, products or services not
usually located on the premises where the sign is
located or which directs petsoe,s to any premise other
than where such sign is located.
(6) "On-Premise Sign" shall mean any ai a advertising the
business, parson, activity, goofs, products or
services primarily located, sold or offered for sale
on the premises where the sign is located. A slim
which promotes or displays a political, religious or
ideological thought, belief, opinion or other purely
noncommercial message shall be considered an
on-premise sign.
(l) "One Sign" or "A Sign" small mean any number of a£`no
located on or supported by a single supporting
structure.
(9) "Portable Sign" shall mean a sign whose principal
supporting structure is iacended, by design or
construction, to be used by resting upon :he ground
for support and which may be easily and quieKly moved
or relocated for cause. Portable signs shall include,
but not be limited to, signs mounted upon or designed
co be mounted upon a trailer, bench, wheeled carrier
or other non-motorized mobile structure with or with-
out wheels; and A-frame signs and other similar
signs, or supporting structures thereof, resting or
leaning on the ground or other structures but not
parmanently attached thereto.
(9) "Projecting Sign" shall mean any sign which is wholly
affixed to, or supported by any building wall, and
which extends beyond the building wall more than
twelve (12") inches.
(110) "hoof Sign" shall wean any sign wholly erected zn,
affixed to, constructed on, maintained pon, suprartod
by, or located upon any roof :1 any building.
(11) "Stake Sign" shall mean a sign whose principal su
porting structure is to designed or Shaped, usual~y
by making one and painted, so is to be erected and
used by pushini, ~eundia;, hammering or foreing ►nco
cho ground and a wing quick and easy removal and
relocation from one place to tnochar.
(112) "Wall St n" shall aeaa any sign unolly affixed to,
!u orte by, or ppainted upon the wall of any
bud ding, and which is not a pto;eccing sign.
(R) "Supporting Structure" :cans any pole, post, cable, or
at'.-.or structural fixtuces, or pars, so arranged or used
so AS to hold, secure or support a sign, or par: zaereof,
and which to not isprimtad ar labeled with any picture,
symbol, lectors, number! or words im Axe all of aha inch
in tsight nor is internally or decoratively illustneted.
(1) "Sind Device" means any flag, banner, pennant, streamer at
Itmilar device that saves !Italy in chi air.
PAGE S
44„ { N, yY. Y\l N'.~ .J t V 1's.. Y ei t`y F
3. Signs tsot Regulated. The following types of signs shall
be exempt from the provisions of this Article:
(a) Govern" atal Siam. Any sign erected or maintained
pursuaa to and to discharge of soy governmental
fuse a or which i.• required by law, ordinance or
governssotal regulation.
(b) Railway Signs. Any sign vitnin or on railway property
an placed or maintained in reference to the operation
of such railway.
(c) Utili. Signs marking utility or underground
costae teem one or traosaission lines.
(d) yehiele S! na. Signs displayed or used upon vehicles,
cra e~T rs or aircraft unless such vehicle, trailer or
aircraft on which such sign is displayed is pertinently
stationed or regularly used at a fixed location to
serve the sass or similar purpose of a permanent or
portable sign not affixed to a vehicle, trailer or
airereft.
(a) SL ns Not Visible Fro Street. Aay sign where no part
o sue s gn s v s a roe any public street.
(f) Holiday, Relit ions Si ns. Temporary holiday or
re g out s gas w snout commercial advertising.
(g) dSila! oa3Persons. Hand held signs, signs, symbols or
spi- a a persons or animals.
(h) Unused Si as. Signs being manufactured, craospcrted
or score and not being used, in any saaaer or form,
for purposes of advertising.
Plaques. Commemorative plaques of recognized
n s'~-corieal societies and organizations.
Private Traffic Control. On-premiss signs Which
rect Fe movemeac o traffic on private property
(such as entrance and exit signs) or warn of
obstacles, overhead clearances, or control parking;
provided that such signs, are less cnan 10 feet in
effective area, are less Chan 6 feet in height, and
are not placed so as to OtAtfore etch ere safe
movement of vehicles or pedestrians.
(k) Nail boxes Nevs a er Racks. Signs located an sail
oxen, newspaper van ding machines, and curbside
residential newspaper holders which identify the owner
and address of the premises or the name of the
newspaper sold or subscribed :o; provided, that suer
devices are not placed so as co interfere with the
safe movement of pedestrians or vehicular traffic.
(1) Sl e 0 ~ aee acne co ;tack Device and Eautoaene. Signs
to.tns sta on, ar pa neea upon mxenines,
devices and equipment located or used outdoors Wnicn do
hot generally advertise the business wners such
machines, dsvicas and equipment are used or located but
do, in regard co such aacnines, devices or equipment,
identify its trademark„ tradename or manufacturer; give
the name or cote of the product or sarvi4-a provided
therefrom; or jive the operating inatriCtiona therefor.
PAO C 6
%
Such machines, devices and equipment shall Include, but
not be limited to coin-operated vendint machines, fuel
dispensia pumps, telephone booths or facilities, auto-
matte teller machines, autcaccive vacuum cleaners, and
other similar Self-service Outdoor machines, devices or
equipaent.
4. Prohibited Signs. It shall be unlawful for any person to
erect, construct, maintain, reconstruct, place, convert, locate
or sake use of or cause to be erected, constructed, maintained,
rec.nstructed, placed, Located or used, any of the following
signs f:* adverti4ing purposes:
(a) Signs on Private Pro art without Consent of Owner.
gns ocate on pr vats ptoperty v shout the consent
of the owner of said premises.
(b) Ilarkini __~_n_~d!laneuwtins Areas. Signs which are
13 rgel 3T"i3f -he use of a required
off-street parking space or maeauvering area.
(c) Vnsafe Slips. Signs which are, or becomes
ecer Otero dilapidated or in danger of falling or
otherwise unsafe.
(d) Si ns on Public Pro ere Signs which are 'ocaced on
or w ch n a pea c :race, sidewalk, alley, right-of-
way, curb, or any public bridge or part of same, or on
any public building or structure of any kind belonging
to cna City, vuen such use or location unreasonably
Interferes with, or creates danger in cne use of the
public property. In any case, ground or portable,
signs shall not be located within the public risnc-
of-way and no sign shall be located with- in a street
median or intersection visibility triangle.
(e) Code Com 1 lanea. Signs which do not comply with any
app~cabls pro-vision of a butldiag code, eiactrical
code, or other applicable code or ordinance of the
city.
(f) Trees and Shrubs. Signs located on trees Sno Shrubs.
(g) Motion Picture St ns. Signs which employ a
5%4r6QprLCATliecure machine.
(h) Si a_q 1 0 c~ in or :ncerfarin With View. Signs
oca oa 0 um pate o sucn a manner as ro obscure
or otherwise interfere wlca tae ef!ectlveness of an
official traffic sign, signal or device, or so as to
obstruct or interfere with cat viav of a driver of
approaching, emerging or intersecting traffic, or to
as to prevent any traveler on any street from
obtaining A clear view of approacising vehicles for a
distance of 250 feet along the street.
(t) Pr: er Shialdtn of Lt heed St ns. Signs containing
:r caking use o gncs which are not effectively
shielded is to prevent bums or rays of lights from
beintj directed at any portion of tae traveled way of a
puolie street or which are of such intensity or
brillianea, regardless of use, directions or
shielding, to as to likely tmpair or interfere with
t:ae vision of any driver of any motor vehicle upon a
public serest.
PACE 7
< t ^T., p. i4 ~,x, re >`r x Y'1 .4 ~f a G,g .ice` Ae:x r ~ n
Flashie !1_inkine or_tra~_Lights. Any sign with
Z~hi'g,"5I at, or Crave ng ghcs except temporary
Christmas lights or signs which have a moving sassage
or which have W.,oaatically changing messages.
S. Administration ap - Wreceaent. The building Official
shall enforce and adainistar the provisions of this Article. The
Building Official or City Manager may delegate the duties and
powers granted to and imposed upon the building Official by this
Article.
g. PERMITS.
1. Parait Required foc Slans. It snail be unlawful for any
person to place, locate, treat, construct, recDnstruec, alter,
maintain, or make use of any sign, not exempt from regulation,
without having first secured a written permit for such sign from
the building OlEleial, except as otherwise provided in this
Article.
2. Exeeotions to Permit Aeouirecent. The following types of
regulated signs shall be exempt from the permit requirements of
this Article, but must comply with all other applicable regulation
of this Article:
(a) Legally nonconforming signs as difinad In this Article.
(b) wall signs, legal notices and building address nu:bars.
(c) State or National Flags.
(d) Signs painted on glass surfaces of -dindows or doors.
(a) Portable Signs.
(E) Stake Signs.
3. Application Procedure. ,no application for a si;r. psrait
shall be submitted on such forms as tea BuildiaS Official :ay
prescribe and shall to accompanied by such Infeoraacion, drawings
and descriptive data as requirad by the Building Official to in-
sure proper regulation of such sign and to Insure compliance with
this Article.
4. Permit Pea, If the plans and specifications for such sign
set forth in any application for a permit conform to all of the
requirements of this Article and any other ordinance or law
applicable thereto, the Building Offiel.sl shall, upon payment of
the following fee, issue the appropriate permit:
PACE 8
3 a ran k+-rfi' i `r n Y 1" J A'. .fpr r w e W 4~a.}. te.
Effective Area of Sis1 (S q. Ft. Fee
0 to SO $15.00
over SO to 100 20.00
over 100 to 200 25.00
over 200 co 300 30.00
over 300 50.00
S. Duration of Permit. Unless otherwise revoked, all permits
issued for signs shall be valid for an indefinlee period of tine,
except as otherwise provided for in this Article.
6. Revocation of Permit; AD0,* Is.
(a) Revocation. Notice; Order. The Building Official is
nere y grance the power CO. revoke aay and all si o
permits for violation of any provision of th1s
Article; provided that, the building Official shalt
conduct a hearing, if requested by the permit holder,
prior to the revocation of the permit, The person
whose permit is under consideration shall be given at
least ten (10) days written notice of the date and
time of the hearing and shalt be permitted to piesent
relevant facts regarding the pending revocation,
Following such hearing the Building Official shall
issue a written decision, and, if such permit is to be
revoked, provide the permit holder with a copy of such
decision and order revoking such panic.
('o) a eels from Revocation. Any perxitholder wishing co
app ea c e ecis on an order of .ne Building Official
revoking a sign permit may appeal the sacs to the
Board of A1justment in accorda3ce with the laws,
ordinances, regulations and procedures governing other
matters appealed to said Board.
C. PORTABLE SIGNS.
1. Regulations AOblicable to all Portable Sisns. to addition
co all ocher applicable provisions :he followtag regulations
shall apply to all portable sips in all zoning districts:
(a)
us Li
Flas hts Prohibited. No portable sign shall
Ell use f0 as to maKe sae 3f any flasn:ng or
intermittent lights on or in con)unction with such
sign.
(b) Siq_ns~Anchored. All portabla signs used for
alovert~ purposes, when not in transit, shall be
securely anchored, to as to prevent overturning or
unsafe movement, the sufficiency of such anchorage to
be determined by the, Building Official.
(c) Maximum Site. vo portable sign 16-.All oe used for
a verc s ng vhic,t is in excess of 72 square feet of
effective area.
2. ;:umber of On-Premise Portable Sisns Limited. :40 ;arson
shall place, tract, maintain or make use of, at any one time, on
any one premise more than two (2) on-?:anise portable $tins for
purposes of advertising of an affective .rca of 25 square Net
PAGt 9
x sir is9a fy~
p ak; +L .~'t rY~...d ~iir ~ ii •}.Y ( 'l s V n. r.
e
or less or Bore than one (1) on-premise portable sign for
purposes of advertising of an effective area of more than 25
square feet.
3. Eetulation of Off-Precise Portable Signs. The following
regulations shall apply to all off-premise portable signs used
for advertising:
(a) Number Limited. No person shall tract, maintain or
make uie of _Zore than one off-premise portable sign
at any one time to advertise, identify or otherwise
give Information relating to the business, activity,
event, product or service, whether one or core,
located on or at any one business, store or
commercial establishment.
(b) Spacing. No person snail place, erect, make use of
or ma nca£n an off-premise portable sign within -53
feat of another off-promise portable siga. :n
computing the spacingl requirement, the measurement
shall be made paralle to the nearest curb line and
on the same side of the street.
(c) Identification. The owner of ao off-premise poreaole
sign s ar cause each sign to be conspicuously
labeleo o marked with one owner's name, address and
colophons number.
(d) Rs ister To Is Yeot. Every owner placing, using or
ca.nta.n ng an ot.•preaise portable sign Shall xesp
a current register or book snowing the date or daces
warn, and location of the premises where, such sign
is placed or used. No person shall record or
register a sign a being used on a date or dates or
at a premise when such sign was not so used. :very
person required to keep a current register or book
shall make such register or book aval:able to the
Building Inspector for tnspecticn, .pon damand, at
any reasonable ti--*.
Abatement of Off-Praaise Portable 5:;as ii Five Years.
Beginning !Iva years from the effacttve lice of tnll ord.aahce,
no person shall erect, use, make use of, ar aaiataih any o£:-
ptem£se portable sign for advertising or bs,str.ass purposes.
D. REGMATION OF StONS 3Y cO.NZNG DISMIC:S.
ins folioeing regulations apply to speeiftad signs th the
specified ton.ng districts.
1. Residential Districts. :he folloulr.g regulations 1,1441
appl; to signs in all residential :or.ir.; :iserI.Cs.
(a) ' Roof, p?rojecting, portabla or off-?remise
lri-ni are proaibiced.
(b) N.eiLtt. ao si;n .ull have a greater neijet than 13
?lit.
PACE 10
~ . w~r ` ,LPN ' ~ •.~S ~,i 2 :'rt 4.' . ~ 't_ rt r.T r r r~.T~ rile +.n r~..k t y.
(c) Size. "o Sign shall have an effective area greater
T SO 4;wee feet-
(d) Setback. till ground signs shall maintain a minimum
311T&Mce or setback fros the curb line which is
equal to or greater than one-half of the required
front yard f)r the premise where the sign is located.
(s) Number. O-ily one ground sign shall be located on
one premise; except as provided for as follovs:
(1) Any premises fronting more than one public strut,
which is not an alley, s.u:11 be allowed to sake
use of one ground silo on each separate street
frontage.
(2) Any premise which has more :han 450 feet of public
strut frontage on any one public street (exclud-
ing, alleys) may make use at one additional ground
sigo for each 450 feet of frontage, or fraction
thereof; the round suns to be paced no closer
than one-half! of the total distaaes of total
street frontage on which ttay are used.
2. Non-Residential 0tseriets. The following regulations
shall apply to signs In non-reaidential zoning districts:
(a) Type. All types of signs are psrmitced.
(b) Height- No sign, which is n2c a roof sign, shall
have ■ height ireater than 4U feet.
(c) Size. No Sign Shall have an effective area ;rester
tnan 400 square foot.
(d) Setback. All around, porrable, and projecting signs
ssF` saiotain a minimum d:scacea or setback from the
curb line, as determined by hei ht and effective
area, in accordance with the follow as:
4 ,minimum Setback Fc
3 30 30 30
Height (fc.) 2 20 20 30
10 20 30
0 50 ISO '600
Effective Area (Sq.Fc.)
(tn determining the required setbr.ek the xeasureeent
of the hei`nt or effective area of tha sign vnich
would require the greatest setback shall be used;
provided, novev•r, chat if the determining height or
effective area measurement is a diasnslon that
Separates two different setback requirements the
Issic restrtctive setback shall be used.)
(e) Number. Only one ground siin, or supporting struc-
VQ711 hereof, shstl be located an any one promise,
except as follows:
(1) Any ppremises fronting more than one public street,
wnleh is not an alloy, snail be 4ll0W9d to sake
use of one around Sign for each Separate street
frontage.
FACb 11
a`n ±2s i
(2) Any premise which has more than 450 foot of public
street frontage on any one street (excludilg alleys)
may make ,4se of one additional `SO feet of fror.:age,
or fraction thereof. The signs to ba pl+.ced mo
closer than one-half of the total distance of the
coral street frontage on which they are used.
(3) Where an premise contains more than one lawfullyy
permitted business or use in divided buildings, each
business or use thereon shall be allowed one or more
on-promise signs on the permitted supporting
structures thereon.
3. Planned Development District. All signs located in a
Planned DevolopRont District shall comply with all provisions of
this Article including any provision that would have been
applicable to the property on which the sign is located mad the
property been otherwise t,~ned into districts in accordance with
the uses shown on the a,proved site plap for such ?lamned
Development; provided, io.4v@r. that the Planning and Zoaiag
Commission may recom••end, and the City Council may vary in the
planned development ordinance for said premises, any of the sign
requirements of this Article as such requirements would apply to
signs in Planned Devel,opmenc Districts.
a. Central 3usin!ss Districts. The following regulittioas
shall apply to sic s in Central business Zoning Districts.
(a) Ri ht-of-W'1 Limitation )n Pro actin Si Ins. No pro-
act n` J1810-
gn small project or extend into the public
right-of-way for a distance of more than 10 feet or
within 2 feet of the nearest curb line, whichever is
more restrictive. No projecting sign, supporting
structure, or part thereof which extends into tae
public right-of-vay small occu y ♦ny of the space
between the ground level and 3 feet above said ;round
level in said right-of-way.
(b) Site- No sign shall have an effective area greater
cnan 400 square feet.
(c) Hetiht Limitations. No ground sign or supporting
et. ura tneroot shall have a hetgnt greater calm (60
!let.
E. REGULATION OF ATTACHED SIGNS.
In addition co any other applicable regulations, the follow-
ing regulations shall apply to the type of sign specified in all
toning districts.
1. Roof Sitns.
(a) Pro ect ~j. Roof signs, o: the supporting structure
tkareof, small not extend lstorally beyond the exterior walls,
PAGE 12
e .a. kr° ° s.1y; K< "~Pr r ; 9.. m \ t- 1 i cif 7 t, Y . e u s o
or upward beyond the highest point of the roof of the building on
which it is located, to a height, as measured Eros ground level
co the highest part of the roof, which is greater than specified
below as follows: bldg 55%
f bid ((2) t00 wo (2) story bldg At of bldg height
(3) three (3) to five (S) story bldg 10% of bldg height
J4 six 6) to nine (9) story bldg M of bldg height
S tae 10) to fifteen (15) story bldg 23% of bldg height
(6) sixteen (16) story bldg or higher Mar.. height of 40 feet
(b) Construction. All roof signs shall be thoroughly
secure 1 o else building upon which they are installed.
2. Profectini Sians.
(a) Cog useoA. All projecting signs shall be securely
attic e the building or structure.
(b) Pro)eatioa 1~yond Aoof. A projecting sign shall not
51 04c a oa na +aS1 of any building so as to
pro see above the roof or parapet wall or above the
tool level where there is no parapet wall; except that
a sign erected at a right angle to the building, the
horizontal width of which sign, perpendicular to such
wall, does not exceed eighteen inches may be erected
co a height not exceeding 2 feet above the roof or
parapet wall or above she roof level where there is no
parapet wall. A st`n attached co a corer of a
building and parallel to the vertical line of such
corner, shall be deemed to be erects.. at a right angle
co the buildiag wall.
(c) Size. rho total square footage of all projecting
~s`ns shall not exceed twenty (20%) portent of the
wall area on which such signs are located.
3. Wall Signs.
(a) Construction. Wall signs attached to exterior walls
of srid masonry, concrete or stone, shall be safely
and securely attached. Wood blocks shall not ba used
for anchors e, except to the case of •+all st;ne
attached to tuildiags with walls of wood. A wall stgn
shall not be supported by anchorages secured co an
unbracod parapet wall.
(b) Size. The total square footage of all wall st;ns
$ `naTI not exceed twenty (20:) ?accent of :no Wall area
on which such signs are located.
4. Signs on Common SulldLaps. Vaon one or more ac:acaed
signs are located or to be located or, a building which is divided
and concalns more than one business or usa, the regulation of
such attached signs spacified herein, as co site and pro)ectiod,
shall apply saparacely to the pare of the exterior walls which
contain that business or use.
PACE 13
7777s
F. ABANDONED SIGNS
1. Removal of Abandoned Signs. All abandoned signs and their
supportiag structures, if not a building, shall be removed witnLa
thirty (30) days from the dace of abandonment by the owner of the
promises on which such sign is located Any sign or supporting
structure which is an abandoned sign on the affective data of
this ordinance shall be removed within thirty (30) days of the
effective date of this ordinance.
2. Extension of Time To Use. The owner or lessee of the
premises on vr.ich an abandoned sign is located, who desires to
use such sign, or supporting structure, may within sixty (60)
days of the abandonment or effective date of this ordinance, aaRe
application co the Building Official for an extension of tixe to
make use of such sign. If the sign or supporting structure
conforms to all requirements of the law and the applicant submits
reasonable evidence that he is endeavoring to make use of such
sign in a lawful manner the Building Official may grant an
extension of time up co a maximum of twelve (12) months for the
owner or lessee to make use of the sign. The Building Official
may, as a condition of granting such extension require that the
,wner or lessee paint out, obscure, cover, or remove some or all
of the elements or message or face portion of tr.e sign to such
manner as to leave the sign and supporting structure neat and
unobtrusive In appearance or In narmony with the ad,acenc
buildings co which it is located or attached.
3. Procedure for Removal of Abandoned Signs. Any abandoned
sign for which an extension of time co use rise not been granted,
or any unlawful sign at supporting structure thereof, is hereby
declared a public nuisanca and may be removed in accordance with
the procedures sat forth herein.
(a) :notice and Order. The Building Official shall deliver
or send a written notice to the parson responsible for
placement, erection, or maintenance of an abandoned,
or unlawful sign, Lf known, or if not known, to the
owner or person in control of the sign or premases
where such sin is located, ordering the removal of
such sign and its supportinga structure within ten
(10) days of delivery or mailing, of the notice and
?ACt 14
Cir N~ ».M1 ..Y i '.Y 1. nU~ l:. iF .~Si of u... 4✓.. `TT_ M i$ F
k
,
order. For purposes of this provision the name of the
person listed by the Ctty Tax Assessor/Collector or
other local taxing jurtidiction for tax purposes ss the
owner of the premises where such abandoned or uoiaweul
sign is located shall be presumed to be the owner of
such property or ch• agent for such owner and notice
mailed or delivered to said potion at the address
listed shall be presumed to be sufficient.
(b) Resoval• Ao94 414. If the parson ordered to remove said
s' fa'iils co do so within the time specified, the
suildin` Official may, after tweety (20) days of the
date of delivery or maLltog of the notice mad order,
remove or cause said sign to oe removed, provided,
however, that any person ag&rieved b I said order say
file an appeal with the board o Adjustment to
accordance with the provisions applicable for other
appeals from decisions of the building official. to
case such appeal is timely filed, the procedures
appltcata a to other appeals shall be followed and the
order of the Building Official may be stayed in
accordance tner•of pending the final datatiatnattom of
the board of Adjustment.
(c) Im o~ uedaen~ of Sians; Redemntton: aisaasal.. Any sign
w e s remove y y t• u ng UZZLC a pursuant to
these provisions shall be .spounded and transported to
and stored by the building Official at a locatica
designated for such purpose. Records of Where such
ai+ns were located and when removed shall be kept. The
Building Official shall sand a letter co the owner of
such sign, if known, or if not known, to the owner or
person in control of the premises where such sign is
located giving notice of such impoundment.
rho Building Official 0411 hold the sign in store e
for at least thirty (A) !ays after notice of impouT
sent has boon mailed. Ary portable sign may be redeemed
b the owner thereof upon the payment of a fee to the
City of Denton through the building Official, of a total
of $25.00 for hauling the some co storage plus $1.00
per day storage fee, Any nonporcable sign may ba
redeemed by the owner thereof upon payment of cne cast
of removal of and hauling chi same to storage, As
determined by the building Official, plus $1.00 per day
storage fee.
Any sign not reclaimed by cne owner thereof withia
thirty (30) days of the mailing of cns notice of
tapoundment may be disposed of in accordance with
applicable IAw.
(d) Recoveof Costs. If, upon disposal of an unredeemed
non or oio s igno the suildtng Official aas not
received an amount sufficient to cover the Cost of
removal and haultn of such removed sign, the building
Official shall sand notice to the owner of the promises
where such siga was located req'Mttn; payment of tae
removal and hauling costs less any amount rseei-ad in
disposal of such sign. Any such costs remaining unpaid
after thirty (30) days from the date of sailing of
notice shall become delinquenc and shall boar Interest
at ten (10X) percent par annum. The Building Official
may cause such unpaid and delinquent amount co be
arsegsed a ainst the ;remises uner• such removed sign
was located by filing and perfecting a lien against
said premises. The cost levied against said promises
shall include a $50.00 administration fee.
Mot 0
(e) A cal Co a Gvied. Any parson may coa-
C DA cost for Cho removal
of a Sign imposed M repoder by filing an apppeal with
the Board ofi Ad ustment vithin twenty (20) days of
the mailing o! e~e notice of Such costs. The Board
th Adjustment ma either uphold tM cost LmpoSed by
the Building Ofcieial or impose Sad cause to be
lwied whatwer cost it eonsiCers to be reasonable.
Storage costs imposed hereunder Small not be
appealable.
O. SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
1. Hanger of Haaaurement:•
(a) Setb ck. To apply the setback provision of this
Are c e for signs at any one oiat, the following
measuring procedure shall be used P
(1) Draw an imaginary vertical line extending upward
from the curb line of the premises;
(2) Beginning at any point on the vertical line draw
an imaginary horizontal line perpecdicular to the
vertical lion and curb lice and extending toward
the premises;
(D) Beginning at the point where the vertical line
intersects the ho izontal line, measure along the
horizontal line For the required setback. (See
Appendix illustration 14a)
(b) Height. To apply the applicable height limitations
of-Ma Articla at any one point fog signs, or
supporting structures thereof, which are not roof
signs, the following measuring procedure shall be
used:
(1) Draw an imaginary vertical line extending upward
from the nearest curb line of chi public street
fronting the premises;
(2) Beginning at the surface Level of the curb line
measure along the vertical line co a point which
is the maximus allowed 'height for a particular
sign or supporting structure;
From that point draw an imsginary horizontal line
premisitcular to the vertical i:ne towards the
(4) This extended horizontal line dives the xaxtaum
height allowed at that location fat a particular
si{a or supporting structure. (Sae Appendix
[lluatration 14b).
(c) EfJOtiv Area. In determining the effective area of
a s gTa wnere more than one sign is :ocaeed or affixed
ee a single supporting structurs, all signs located
tearoom or affixed tnereto shall be nalud*d at,d
measured together as though they ware one stgn.
2. Setback Claar,~zo,nel. to all zoning diltricct, except
Central Business Districts, all ground signs sr.ail be to located
to tnat no part of the effective area of such sign snall occupy
PA42 16
the space, (as determined in the same moaner for moaaurial
height and setback for silos), between 2 and 10 feat in height
within 15 feet of the curb line of any public scraat; (See
Appendix Illustration 14c).
The supporcial structure of such sign may occupy such space
to an extent no lraater than 2 square feat in area, such area to
to determined in the same manner as for effective area of silos.
Silas on Certain Hiahvavs. The provisions of this
Article shall apply to all signs along the Interstate or primary
System of Highwa).,6s within the City to chi extent that s+ich
provisions supplsment or compliment, but are not in conflLec
with, any law, rule or regulation oaacted by or made pursuant to
the federal Highvay Beautification Act, (2) U.S.C.A., Set. 121,
at seq) including all ameadments thereto. or the Texas Highway
Beautification Act, (Article 6674 v•1, V.A.C.S.) including all
amendaones thereto. All sign permits issued by the Building
Official pursuant to this Article snall contain a notice
advising :he pergittee that stgns located along chi interstate
or primary system of highways may be regulatal by federal or
state law or regulation and a permit may be required from
another govaromentil agency.
4. Clearance from Electrical Lines. Signs shall be located
a minimum distance of 6 feat measured snort:ontally and 12 feet
measured vertically from overhead electrical conductors whin
are enorli:ed in excess of NO volts. The term "overhead
conductors" as used herein means any electrical conductor,
dither baso or insulated, installed above chi ground.
S. Temporary and Political Signs.
(a) Temporary real estate sales and developmanc, :emporary
political, occasional sales and other speeLsl use
signs which are used for, or relies to, a particular
purpose or event shall be removed by the owner of the
promise on which they are located after ten (10) de,ys
of tha data of the accomplisnm•::e of the purpose for
wnich they are used or cne oc.irrento of the event to
which they refer or rolaco.
(b) In cne tale of tomporary political signs the
candidate to which a sign refer!, if not placed on a
promise by the owner of cne pre2ite caaroof, snall be
PAGZ 17
-1 T
a
i
s
.I '
responsible for the removal for such sigas within the
time specified above.
(c) Stake or portable signq which relate to a candidate or
issue to be voted upon by a political party or at a
public election and are 23 square fast or less in
effective area may be erected without limit as to
number; provided, that such signs compl with all
other applicable requirements of this Article.
6. Sign Maintenance. All silos and supportiag structures
shall be kept in good repair, condition and appearance. All
faces, bolts, supporting frames and fastenings shall be free from
deterioration, insect or rodent infestation, rot or loosening.
Painted signs which are faded or obscured because of weather or
tine shall be repainted or redone or painted over so as to be
neat in appearance.
7, Identification of Signs. Every off-premise sign shall be
plainly marked at all times, in a location to as to be conspicuous
and easily identifiable, with the current name, address sad tole-
phone number of the owner or lessee of the sign.
K. NONCONTORMING SIGNS.
1. Applicability. She provisions of cnis Article, definiag
and regulating nonconforming signs, shall control over any other
conflicting provision of the toning ordinance.
2. Defined. A sign, including its supporting structure, shall
be considered nonconforming when it does not conform to all or
part of the provisions of chit Article applicable thereto, is not
a portable sign or stake sign, and:
(a) was in existence and lawfully located a-id used on the
effectiva date of this Article, or;
(b) was in existence and lawfully located and used in
accordance with the provisions of the prior ordinance
applicable thereto, or which was considered legally
nonconforming tnsreunder, sad has since bean in
continuous or regular use; or
(W) was in existance, located, and used an the property at
the time the property was annexed to the City of Denton
and nee since been in regular and continuous use.
3. Destruction; Repair.
(a) Any nonconformin sigtn, including its supporting
structure, which ~s destroyad, damaged, dilapidated or
deteriorated shall not be replaced, repaired, or
PACE 1$
h. renovated, is whole or to part, if such replacement,
repair or renovation would require an expenditure of
moat as in excess of fifth percent (30%) of the repro-
duction cost of a mew a so, including its supporting
structure, which is substantially the same or similar
to the nonconforming sign destroyed, damaged,
dilapidated or deteriorated.
(b) The building official may, whenever he deems necessary
to reasonably determine the applicability of this
` foresoins provision, require the owner of said non-
conforming sign to submit two or more independent
estimates from established sign companies of the cost
of replacing, repairing or renovating, in whole or is
part, the existing noneooformin` mien and two or more
independent estimates from established sign companies
of the reproduction cost of a new sign, including its
supporting structure, which is substantially the same
or similar to the nonconforming sign destroyed
damagedl dilapidated or deteriorated.
(c) So sig or supporting structure which is lawfully
reprodun ced, repaired, or renovated as a nonconformLng
sign shall be increased in effective area or height.
Terminattoa; Time Period. All legally nonconforming signo,
including supporting structures, shall be removed or modified so
as to comply with the provisions of this article on or before
January 1, 1444 or within can (10) years of the date the sign
became nonconforming, whichever is later.
S. Appeals from Termination Perlcd. The owner of any noncon-
forming sign may appeal the termination :Lae specified for such
sign co the board of Adjustment. Appeal procedures, ►nless
otherwise specified heroin, snail be thoss as used in other
matters appealed to the Board of Adjustment.
(e) tJAe for Filin Appeals. The owner of any nonconfora-
ng~gIj who x fines to appeal as termination date
a pl SMe to such owner's sign steal: file his appeal
with the Board of Ad}ustmant within one (1) year of
the effective data of the ordinance or within one (1)
year the premises on which is located a noncooformin
silo is annexed to the City. Failure to file suck
appeal within the time specified constitutes a waiver
of the right to appeal or contest the termination dace
applicable to such nonconforming Stan.
(b) Hearin A eat . The Board of Adjustment may, in its
secac oa, near all properly filed appeals after trio
one (1) year period for filing its passed and sit all
appeals to be heard at one or more times as to
convenient for such Board.
(c) Deters net o , The Board of Aajugtmenc, in case of
appeal o the applicable termination date, shall
determine vheehet the termination date applicable co
appill,at's sign has allowed sufficient time for the
appellant to recover his capital investment in the
nonconforming sisn. to making such determination the
pAOt 19
~ 1 .9. r ..~r1 1``irA,2. ,Y~,wa :-i 'vti', ✓ ,ih.t. r.ne
i
board may consider the wk,unt of the initial capital
investment, life expectancy of the investment, the
removal cost to coup with these' regulations and any
other factor the goarI believes to be pertinent to the
determination. The ambrtixation period appealed from
shall be calculated or measured from the begicoLng of
the emortixation period; 1.e. the date the sign
becomes nonconforming.
(d) Extsnsion of Amortixatioe Period. If the board
stern has t t t o rem nae on date as applied to
appellant's nonconforming sign does not afford
sufficient time to allow appellant to recoup nis
investment in such sign, the Board may grant, by its
order, an extension of time to A date specified so
that such sign may be maintained as a nonconforming
sign until such specified date.
b. Relocation of Nonconforminj Sites, Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Article, any sign which is a legally
existing nonconforming sign hereunder may be relocated on the
same lot or tract of land if the sign is required to be removed
from its present location because of the acquisition of the
property upon which the sign is located by any governmental agency
or other entity which did or could have acquired the property
through the exercise of its power of eminent domain. Such role-
cited sign shall be placed, insofar as possible, as to comply
with all the provisions of this Article. The termination period
specified herein shall not be extended because of such relocation.
7. Sisns Located on Nonconforminx Premises. Where, on the
effective date of this ordinance, a sign is located on a premise
which is a legally nonconforming use of trio premise and such sign
is used in regard thereto, the sign may be used and maintained
thereon, even cnough it would not be a permitted use, so long as
such premise is continually used as a lawful nonconforming use;
provided, however, if such sign is nonconforming as to height,
area, or setback, such sign shall, after the termination period
allowed heroin, be brought to conformity with such requirements
applicable co the seeing district in which such sign is located.
I. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ALLUU£D.
1. The Board of Adjustment may grant a special excepti2n from
the provisions of this Article for the setback or height of a
nonportable silo u*der the following eireuvs anesss
PAOt 20
W ~ v I ~
.3 (e) morebo i i e~via'ieea~Ofs such sign ass located or
to be located is accordance with the setback or height
raquireswots of thin Article cannot or would not be
visible from at lease one "visibility point" because
of the location of a building of structure constructed
oorrdin erecanceted prior to the effective date of this
.
For the purposes of this provision, "visibility point"
'hall Sean the vievia locations, at a height of 6
lot above the genera surface level, determined by
ertandiog the required aide yard setback lines of the
premise oa which such sign is located or to be located
so as to intersect the curb line of the public street
fronting said premise; then ■tasuriag from said Later-
section points aloog the curb line io the direction of
the nearest side lot liar of said lot for a distance
of 100 feet. If the street fronting said premise
&Ilovsl~traffic flow in only one direction, the
visibility point located along the curb line in the
direction frog which traffic approaches said premise
shall be used to determine the visibility requirement
herein. (See Appendix Illustration No. 140
(b) Medical Emergency Signs. When a sign located on the
would. because of thensetback medical
height treatment requiremeace
of this Article, not be readily visible from adjacent
Public streets. For purposes of this provision,
Emergency Medical Treatment facility" shall mean any
hospital, clinic os other facility where medical aid
is offered to a parson or animal who suffers an
unsioacted injury or illness which requires intediace
medical attention.
2. In granting special exceptions allowed herein, the board
of Adjustment shall specify, by vricten order,. the particular
setback or the particular height that will be allowed and in
doing so shall not allow deviation from the provisions of this
A:cicle beyond what is minimally necessary to remedy the
situation allowing for said special exception.
1. HISTORIAL LANDMARK SIGNS
The provisions of this Article shall not apply insofar as
they confict with say provision applicable co a sign designated
as a historical landmark pursuant to :lie provisions of Article
16A of Appendix b-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Denton, Texas.
K. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
The definitions and provisions of tnis Article applicable to
signs shall control over any ocher conflicting definition or
provision found in Appendix b-toning of one Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas,
FAG! 21
p ?1 ; 4 •'t, r
1-7
S~iTION III.
That the Appendix Illustrations of Appendix 8-Zoning of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton are nersby mended by
adding the following illustrations:
la. SIGNS
lea. Measurtsent of Setback.
SIP
!Ir
Sheet
urb line
14b. Messursment of Reight
SIGN
E
I
} :we 1 ine
MAnv 77
fig 4s r is4 d F .777,F s L IN AT: +u
17
M Awl .Now. a
10 !1.
b{C. SotbwA CIG&ruoo 9fts
40T. 400
I E*war# I'm
ur"t j ( 00
N.M. oeer
i T--
1A test
0 S 1 I ! Grelim
l/d. visibility Potat
"lot /
CG.
S
Imi M /
Cyr, ~ ~
Stew
A1*10Y Him
PACC 23
f
SECTION IV.
That the dafimitions Of various type signs of Article L2 (51)
through (59.1) of Appendix g•Zonidg of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of - Denton are hereby repealed in their entirety; said
numbering to be reserved for future use.
SECTION V.
That Article 19 C of Appendix g•Yoning of the Code of Ordi-
nances of the City of Denton relating to special development
signs is hereby repealed in its antirety; said paragraph C to be
reserved for future use.
SECTION VI.
That Article 27 (52) of Appendix g•ioning of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton defining "sign" is hereby
repealed to its entirety; said number reserved for future use.
SECTION VI?..
That Section 5.4 of Article I of Chapter 5 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Denton relating to permits for signs is
hereby repealed in its entirety, said section number to be
reserved for future use.
SECTION VIII.
That "I, Silo and Identification Uses" of Article 7 of
Appendix !-toeing of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Venton, Texas is repealed in its entirety.
SECTION IX.
Any person who shall erect, construct, locate, place, asin-
tein, keep or make use of any sign in violation of an; provisions
of this ordinance or otherwise violate a provision of this
ordinance, or who fails to comply tharevith or with any of the
requirements thereof, or of a permit issued thereunder, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding two
Y.undtad Dollars ($200.00) Each such person shall be deemed
guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion
thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is comitted,
or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such
person shall be punished within the limits above.
PAO9 24
~ t~ '•f rJ♦ F .d x. ,':t S Y. Fa,, Ii i:W ~i. r. .'i. 1`~
SECTION X=
That if any section, subsection, paragraph. sentence, clause,
phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any
parson or circusu taoce is held invalid by any court of compeceet
jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
renaining portions of this ordinaoce, and the City Council of the
City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have sate-.ad such
retaining portions despite any such invalidity.
SECTION XI.
All ordinance or parts of ordinances in force whoa the pro-
visions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistant
or in conflict with the terns or provisions contained is this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict.
SECTION XII.
.hat this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days
from the dote of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby
directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record- Chronic Is, the official newspaper of
the City of Denton, Texas, within tan (10) days of the date of
its passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
e%Lk.ffA&Q J. M
CITY OF OESTIMS, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON,tTEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LLGAL FORM!
C. 1. TAYLOR 3R.~~C~"ITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF 0ER11, AXA!
6Ys
PAOt 2S
P f M a. 1° a .1~'
Ao,
City Council Minutes
December 18, 1984
The Council convened into the Work Session at S:30 p.m, in the Civil
Defense Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tem Chew; Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger, and Stephens
City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary
ABSENT: None
1. The Council received a report on activities of the Denton
Sesquicentennial Committee.
Mr. Frank Davilla, Chairperson of the Denton Sesquicentennial
Committee, reported that the committee was trying to generate
interest and enthusiasm for the upcoming events. The deadline for
entry onto the state calendar of events was January of 1985. This
calendar would be very comprehensive and would show events divides
Into three sreas of interest by city, date and type of event.
This would form the groundwork for the Texas bicentennial
celebration activities. The state theme was to be "Come home to
Texas" and included would be a multi-media exhibit called Project
ISO. A Joint celebration would be held with South Australia which
would have their sesquicentennial the same year. The grass roots
celebrations were important and the committee wanted to include all
age citizens, all ethnic groups, etc. The Denton committee was
ptr ring a master calendar of all County activities in conjunction
wit, the Sesquicentennial with the primary goal of having c ty-wide
participation and to ensuring that no one was left out.
The Council expressed their appreciation to Mr. Davilla and his
committee for their efforts on this project.
2. The Council held a discussion of the Fire Department
reorganization and position title changes In the Police and Fire
Departments.
Kathryn U~rey, Director of Personnel, reported that two ordinances
would be placed on the January 8 agenda relating to tiie title
change4 in the Police and Fire Departments. one of the ordinances
would change the name of the position just below the Chief in each
department to Division Commander. The other ordinance would update
the number of positions in each authorized classification. In the
Fire Department the reorganization would provide two ptomotion
positions. A resolution had been approved by the Council relating
to 1269M which would allow the Chief to appoint one person ju!t
below him. Chief Gentry had chosen to appoint to this rtsition
through an assessment center. Currently there was one Assistant
Chief of Administration. The reorganization would add a Battalion
Chief of operations to relieve the work load of the Assistant Chief
of Administration,
Council Member McAdams asked it this meant there .could be one less
Civil Service position.
Usrey responded yes. The total number of employees would remain the
same; however, since the new position was not under Civil Service,
that one position would be lost.
Council Member Stephens asked if the Civil Service Commission had
reviewed these changes and made a recommendation.
Usrey responded this presentation was only a discussion. The Civil
Service Commission was scheduled to meet and make their
recommendations prior to any official Council action.
The consensus of the Council was that the staff should proceed but
if the Civil Service Commission had problems with the items, staff
should bring the items back to Council prior to placing the final
ordinances on the agenda,
`r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1984
Page Two
3. The Council was to hold a discussion on the vacation/bonus
pay policy.
This item was removed from the agenda by staff.
4. The Council field a discussion on proposed expansion of the
Capricorn Mobile Home Park for the purpose of determining whether to
begin the annexation process.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that Council should consider
annexation to gain control of the current sewer problems at the
Capricorn Mobile Home Park as well as ensuring the control of
development in this area.
The consensus of the Council was to proceed with annexation.
Elliso then stated that staff was not annexing large parcels of
land with individual annexations as the city was slotted 101 of the
land sFice per year for involuntary annexations, plus whatever carry
over there was from the previous rear. There Were some potential
annexations around the lake area of approximately 2,000 acres and
staff did net want to deplete the allotment by annexing small
parcels.
5. The Council considered approval of proposed sign ordinance
provisions.
Charlos Watkins, consultant, stated that the Council had ended their
previous discussions with the provision in the proposed ordinance
stating a maximum size of 400 square feet and a maximum height of 40
feet. Also previously discussed had been the question of how far
from I-35 would the 672 square feet maximum site and 70 feet maximum
height to match the Highway Beautification Act apply. In the Golden
Triangle Mall and across Loop 288 there were quite a number of
signs; however, none were 672 square feet in size. In fact, none
were found to exceed 400 square feet. On Interstate 35 there Were a
number of signs (bi:lboards) which exceeded the 400 square feet
size. Between the moll and University Drire there were
approximately 25 such signs including the Sack and Save sign which
was 704 square feet in size. Thirty permits had been issued for
pole signs in the I-3S area. Three exceeded the 400 square feet
size, 15 exceeded ;he 40 feet high require.ient and 4 exceeded 60
feet in height. Watkins then stated that the philosophy and
psychology of seeing looked at the Issue of how much a driver on a
freeway actually sees and recognizes as he drives. The suggestion
is that a biiiboard need no, be larger than 250 square feet in size
based on information on what a person can perceive and absorb wnile
driving. The recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Comnission
had been for a maximum size of 400 sgiiare feet. At a previous
meeting the Council had suggested that a maximum size of 02 square
feet in an area 660 feet either side of the interstate highway woul.1
be acceptable.
Mayor Stewart stated that a question had been raised at the last
discussion regarding the Morrison Milling Company sign.
The Council recognized Mr. Milton fiiil.
Mr. Wilton Hill, representing Morrison Milling Company, stated that
the company felt this particular sign was historical. They were
very proud of the sign and did keep it maintained. Morrison Milling
did not think the flashing lights bothered anyone and woul,i be happy
to have a historical designatio:i placed on the sign.
Watkins then reported that, in the section of the ordinance
regarding minimum set back standards, it had been suggentf-.1 that the
set backs should be relative to the size of the sign. [his would
create almost a 3 dimensional calculation involving the size of the
sign, the height of the sign and the set back,
x p n! S:4 r u i i'
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December le, 1984
Page Three
Council Member Hopkins asked how set backs for signs on interstate
35 would Ce regulated.
Acting City Attorney Joe Morris responded that this could be handled
through the sign ordinance with an exception clause.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if a fee should be included in
the ordinance for signs over 400 square feet In size.
Watkins responded that the original ordinance did not allow any
signs that large; however, a fee could be added.
Council Member Stephens asked how the staff had determined the fees.
Watkins replied that the fees were based on the amount of staff time
which would be involved for inspections of the signs.
The Council then recognized Mr. Cliff Reding.
Mr. Reding stated that anyone could put up a free standing sign of
any height. No certificates or seals by engineers were required on
the plans which dealt with the safety of the signs.
Watkins stated that this could be covered under the building code.
Mayor Stewart stated that this requirement could be added into the
ordinance under the section dealing with the fee structure.
Watkins then addressed the ordinance provision regarding the
limiting of ground signs to 1 ground sign per each premise, with
some exceptions. This provision ;+ould establish a spacing standard
and did allow for i sign for every 450 feet of frontage. if there
was 451 feet of !rontage, there coulu be 2 signs.
The sane sign ordinance provisions would apply in planned
development districts.
Morris added that the planned development classification was the
exception to the zoning ordinance and normal regulations did not
apply.
Watkins stated that the current sign regulations required that the
location of signs be specified in a planned development. The
proposed ordinance stated that if signs were not specified in a
planned development, they would be regulated as in may other zoning
district.
Council Member Stephens stated a more general ordinance might be
preferrable to a very specific one.
Council Member Riddiesperger stated he did not have a problem with
this as planned developments were protected by Council approval.
Council Member Hopkins stated he felt businessmen had an inherent
right to have signs if at all possible.
Mayor Stewart stated that the Council had only denied t sign in a
planned development in 7 years and he felt this was a dead issue.
Council Member McAdams stated the Council often allowed different
things under planned development zoning.
Morris reported the staff could not write regulations for a planned
development.
Watkins stated the next section to be discussed covered special
regulations for the central business district. It established
standards to make roof signs comparable to the height of the
building.
[te
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1981
Page Four
Regardingq pro}ectin signs the proposed ordinance would allow a
sign which was 201 of the site of the will to which it was
attached. Standards were also established for the removal of
abandoned signs. One of the problems was with the set backs. This
ordinance measured the set backs from the curb and not from the
middle of the street.
The Council then discussed the proposal regulations for stake signs.
Council Member Hopkins stated that it did not make sense to limit
the size of stake signs to IS square feet when the plywood material
used to construct the sign came in a 32 square feet site.
The consensus of the City Council was to discuss the proposed sign
ordinance at the January 8 meeting.
6. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
The Council then convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:OfG p.m, in
the Council Chambers.
PRESENT: Miror Stewart; Council Members Alford, Hopkins,
McAdams, and Riddlesperger ,
City Manager, Acting City Attorney and City Secretary
ASSENT; Mayor Pro Teo Chew; Council Member Stephens
1. The Council considered approval of a resolution in memory
of C. J. Taylor, Jr.
The following resolution was presented:
RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF
"C. J. TAILOR, JR."
WHEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr. was the City Attorney of the City of
Denton from November 12, 1979 until his untimely demise
July 13, 1984; and
%HEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr. served on active duty in the United
States Naval Reserve from July :4, 1942 to December 5,
1945, as a radioman aboard the USS Arkansas and the USS
Capps; and
MIIEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr., earned his Doctor of Jurisprudence
Degree from the University of Missouri at Kansas City in
1952 and was admitted to practice before the Supreme Court
of Texas; the Supreme Court of the United States; U. S.
Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; U. S. District Courts for
the Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of
Texas; and
%HEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr. enjoyed a distinguished reputation in the
field of governmental law, having served as Assistant
Attorney General for the State of Texas, Assistant City
Attorney for the cities of Corpus Christi and Austin, City
Attorney for the pities of Irving and Amarillo, President
of the Texas City Attorneys Association in 1970, having
authored the respected and widely-used publication Law and
Procedures for Cities, Towns and Villages in Texas and
having lectured at numerous seminars throughout the State
of Texas on various aspects of the law; and
WHEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr. was a member of the State Bar of Texas;
Texas City AttorcIlys Association; Denton County Bar
Association; North Texas Bar Association; and Phi Alpha
Delta Law Fraternity; ai.d
i"``ib
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1984
Page Five
WHEREAS, C. J. Taylor, Jr. served his community above and beyond the
mere efficient discharge of his duties in promoting the
welfare and prosperity of the citizens of Denton, and
earned the full respect and admiration of his colleagues
and associates;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS:
That the sincere and warm appreciation of C. J. Taylor, Jr.
felt by the citizens and officers of the City bf Denton,
Texas, causes this Resolution to be formally transcribed
into the official minutes of the City of Denton, Texas,
dedicated to the rememberance of the "Honorable C. J.
Taylor, Jr.".
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of December, 1984.
RICHARD 0. T,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEN, (ATT E7 ARY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE U. MUR i NKNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
Council Member Stephens joined the meeting.
Mayor Pro Te■ Chew joined the meeting.
Stephens motion, Hopkins second to approve the resolution. On roll
call vote McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Rih lesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "arr."
Motion carried unanimously.
The resolution was accepted by Mrs. C. J. Taylor, Jr.
2. The Council considered approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of September 18, 1984 and the Special Called Meeting
of September 2S, 1984.
Riddlesperger motion, McAdams second to Approve the 'dinutes as
presented. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Consent Agenda
Council Member Stephens asked that item 3.C.3 be removed from the
Consent Agenda.
McAdams motion, Riddiesperger second to approve the Consent Agenda
with the exception of item 3.C.3. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Stephens stated regarding item 3.C.3. that the pro
rata for Collins Street should go to Christopher Bancroft when the
area to the north of his property was developed.
City Manager Chris Hartung stated that the City Attorney had
determined that a paving assessment would have to be done.
Assistant City Manager Rick Svehla stated that the assessment would
have to be made for the other side of the street of Mr. Bancroft's
development.
1 ~ . _9 'i5 ;,^ti ! v k:r win, r., r 'i z:' r. ~ ~'~t14iv r. •_y rr ' R j.:
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1984
Page Slx
Council Member Stephens asked if this would be done when the
property was developed.
Svehla responded that 0e assessment would have to be done before
the street was built and the property owners would have to be
notified.
Council Member Stephens asked the staff to provide a report on this
is::ue at a later date.
Council Member Riddlesperger stated that he woiild like to see park
space required, is possible.
Stephens motion„ Hopkins second to approve item 3.C.:. 40tion
carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda
A. Bids and Purchase Orders:
Listed below are bids and an agreement to be approved for payment
under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up
information is attach d to the ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, and
7.B). This listing s provided on the Consent Agenda to allow
Council Members to iscuss any item prior to approval of the
ordinance.
1. Bid 0 9366 - Police sedans and sedans
2. Bid i 9367 - Pickups and vans
3. Bid / 9370 - Lease/purchase of motor pool
equipment
4. Bid 1 9371 - IBM disk drive
5. Bid 1 9373 - Loss test set
6. Bid 1 9374 - Tree trimming and
miscellaneous electrical lines
B. Agreements:
1. Approval of an agreement to provide certain
program services on the Utility Billing
System and Payroll-Personnel System during
fiscal year 1984.85 between the City and
Tres Systems, Inc.
C. Plats, Replats, and Site Plans:
1. Approval o: amendment of site plan of an
approved specific use permit on en
approximately 39.313 acre tract of land
located along the east side of Mayhili Road
(S-16S). (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
Z. Approval of preliminary plat of the Garner
Addition, Block 1, Lot 1. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
3. Approval of preliminary plat of the Smith
Hill Addition. (The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommends approval.)
4. Approval of preliminary replat of the
Veteran's Addition, lots 4A and 45. (The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends
approval.)
rs
tY
city of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1984
Page Seven
5. Approval of preliminary plat of Westgate Park,
First Addition, Block C, Lot S. The Planning
and Zoning~Commission recommends approval.)
6. Approval of preliminary plat of The Woodlands and
' Oaks of Township 11 Addition. (The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval.)
4. The Council received a resolutions approved by the Sam
Houston Elementary School Parent-Teacher Association.
Dr. Cliff Black, President of the San Houston PTA, reported that the
resolutions had grown out of problems associated with the rapid
growth in this area. There had recently been a lot of construction
and extension of utility lines. The large ditches created during
the construction were a safety hazard for school children. The
resolutions which had been taken to the School Board were now being
brought before the City Council. The resolutions were formulated to
enhance the safety of the children traveling to and from the Sam
Houston Elementary School. The first resolution suggested that a
method of informing appropriate school personnel be developed in
order to provide the principals of affected school building adequate
warning that a construction project was imminent which would make
passage for children hazardous. The second resolution stated that
additional marked crosswalks and crossing guards were needed along
Hobson Lane. The third resolution suggested that the current path
connecting Pennsylvania Avenue with Teasley Lane over which all
children frog the Southridge area must pass, should be appropriately
widened to handle the volume of bicycle and pedestrian traffic .)n
this artery. Additional safety personnel should be provided to
patrol the wooded area before and after school. The fourth
resolution recommended that Teasley Lane be widened in the immediate
future and immediate steps be taken and consistently pursued to
lower the ipeed limit in front of the school to 20 miles per hour
and 35 miles per hour for appropriate sections preceding the 20 mile
per hour section. The last resolution recommended appropriate steps
be taken to further guarantee the coordination between the city and
school officials regarding safety issues, construction hazards,
forecasting increased enrollment as related to the increased
congestion of traffic patterns.
Council Member McAdams stated she was sympathic to the concerns
addressed in the resolutions. The Council could say yes to the
suggestions and recommendations stated in the resolutions but did
not have any means to implement corrective measures. The requests
del, heated in the resolutions needed to go somewhere else.
Dr. Black responded that the PTA was aware of this but their concern
was that when construction was begun in the school area, the school
had not be notified.
Council Member Stephens stated that Dr. Black had invited him to
atend the PTA meeting and that the Council was concerned about the
safety of all Denton citizens. He had spoken to the City Manager
about these issues.
City Manager Chris Hartung reported that the easiest method of
handling future problems of this nature would be for the schoo!
principal to call the City Manager's office. A representative from
the Denton Independent School District was a member of the
Development Review Committee and should be aware of these ty?es of
projects. The request for additional crosswalks and guards would be
referred to the Citizens Traffic Satety Support Commission for
consideration. Money had been awarded by the State Highway
Department for the widening of Teasley Lane. Regarding the
recommendation to lower the speed limits in the school area, the
state (not the city) sets these. Hartong concluded by stating that
he felt there was a high level of cooperation between the city and
the school district. Both entities were working together on
potential school sites in relation to traffic flow; howeverf the
School Board had to acquire property where it was as economical as
possible.
4 r 1 i . 1r ^r"j ro r 5,, i m Y ~~t^L m A m rn n~,+, ,~1,' p ,fp 'i
City of Denton City council minutes
eetinf.0 December 181 1984
Page E Crdneil Member Hopkins stated that staff should review the crosswalk
situation and report back to the Council.
S. The Council received a petition to by Mr. Jim Goulet
regarding the saving of trees.
Mr. Jim Goulet stated that he was concerned about the wholesale
clearing of trees by developers when selected clearing could be
done. Stricter zoning was needed for environmental impact and to
preserve the trees. More multi-story building would preserve the
open space and an ordinance could be approved to require replanting
of removed trees.
Mayor Stewart responded that this was also a personal concern.
There was an on coming and active program to try to save the trees
and to beautify Denton. However, the trees being removed by
developers were )n private property and were beyond the control of
the City Council.
Council Member Stephens stated that some control cou14 be obtained
through planned development zoning.
6. Public Hearings
A. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
at the southwest
andt Teasley Lane Si.027 acres located
B. L. corner Archer
of h Ryan Road annexation
(FM2181). LB
corn
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that the staff had no new
information on this petition.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to proceed with the annexation. FSotion
carried unanimously.
B. The Council held a public hearing regarding the
proposed annexation of approximately S acres of land located north
of Highway 380 hest and adjacent and west of Masch Branch Road. A_9
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that 1 reply form had been
nailed with l returned in favor.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to proceed with the annexation. Motion
carried unanimously.
D. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Myers DevelopG:nt Corporation for annexation of approximately 131.1
acres located south of Robinson Road and east of Nowlin Road. A10
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mr. Tim January, representing Myers Development Corporation, spoke
in favor asking the Council to give this raquest for annexation
favorable consideration.
.3`:n 1 ~ l~, µ : v ~ p` ~Y: ~ y. y. ~ n ty. T ~ t a ter. F.~ S
a
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1984
Page Nine
Council Member Riddlesperger asked if any thought had been given to
• the proposed extension of southern Loop 288 in this area.
Mr. January responded that the loop would go down State School Road
and would border on their property to the west.
No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing,
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that 2 reply forms had been
mailed with 0 returned. The Planning and Zoning Commission had
recommended approval of the over-all development.
Stephens motion, Chew second to proceed with the annexation. Motion
carried unanimously.
D. The Council held a public hearing on the petition of
Walter DeRonde for annexation of approximately 112 acres located
west of I-3SE service road and north of Marshall Road and east of
the Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. Alit
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
No one spoke in favor.
' No one spoke in opposition.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
David Ellison, Senior Planner, reported that 3 reply forms had been
mailed with I returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to proceed with the annexation. Motion
carried unanimously.
The Council then left the agenda order and considered an emergency
agenda item.
1. The Council considered approval of a resolution relating to
allocation of the right to issue private activity bonds assigning to
the North Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc. a portion GE the
allocation made or to be made to the City of Denton.
Council Member Stephens left the meeting.
Mr.
Ralph Rushing, representing the North Texas Higher Education
Authority, inc., stated thzt the Authority was created by the cities
of Denton and Arlington. Congress had adopted the Deficit Reduction
Act during the summer end Governor White could allocate monies until
the legislature met. The state would have an approximate .s2.3
million carry over of funds. The approval of this resolution and
associated documents would allow the Authority to reserve a portion
of the carry over funds for a future bond issue in 1985 or 198b.
Council Member Stephens joined the .meeting.
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
A RESOLUTION by the City Courcil of the City of Denton, Texas,
relating to allocation of the right to issue private
activity bonds; assigning to the North Texas Higher
Education Authority, Inc. a portion of the allocation made
or to be made to the City of Denton.
WHEREAS, by Executive Order MW-21A, interim procedures have been
established for the 1984 allocation of the state ceiling of certain
private activity bonds; and
a
City of Denton Utf igunih minutes
Neeting of Decem e ,
Page Ten
WHEREAS, the North Texas Higher Education Authority, Inc.
proposes to issue student loan bonds in principal amount not to
exceed $SO,090,000 and it is now appropriate for this governing unit
to assign a portion of the allocation of 1984 to the said Authority;
now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DE:;.ON, TEXAS:
SECTION I.
The City of Denton hereby elects to carry forward an allocation
of 1984 for student loan revenue bonds to be issued vn its behalf
after December $1, 1984 and assigns to the North Texas Higher
Education Authority, Inc. a portion of its 1984 allocation. This
carryforward election is being made pursuant to Section 103(n) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. The amount of
allocation to be included in this carryforward election is for the
purpose of issuing student loan bonds in the total principal amount
of $SO,000,000 (which includes the amount t•eing requested by the
City of Arlington, Texas), it being understood that such bonds are
to be issued for an on behalf of the Cities of Denton and Arlington,
Texas.
SECTION II.
This resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 18th day of December, 1984.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, ayor
City of Denton, Texas
ATTEST:
City Secretary
City of Denton, Texas
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
BY.,
Mayor Stcwart asked Mr. Rushing how big i1I thought the program would
be.
Mr. Rushing responded the Authority had reached their level at the
present time. The repayment rate of the student loans Gas
approximately 41 to 51.
Council Member Riddlesperger asked Mr. Rushing how the increases in
college tuition would affect the Authority.
Mr. Rushing responded the impact would be felt on the demand for the
program.
Hopkins motion, Riddlesperger second to approve the resolution. On
roll call vote, McAdams "Lye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye." and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
The Council then returned to the regular agenda order.
1. Ordinances
A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for the purchase
of materials, equipment, supplies or services; providing for the
expenditure of funds therefore; and providing for ai effective date.
AMMJ
w
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1b84
Page Eleven
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 84-177
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES
OR SERVICES@ PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
THEREFORE; AID PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
appprovkn an agreement to provide certain program services on the
Utilty filling System and Payroll-Personnel system during fiscal
year 184-8S betweeen the City and Tres Systems, Inc.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 84-178
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREPAENT TO PROVIDE CERTAIN
PROGRAM
SERVICES ON THE UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM AHD
PAYROLL-PERSONNEL SYSTEM DURING FISCAL YEAR 1&d4-85 BETWIEE14
THE CITY AND TRuS SYSTEMS, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Hopkins motion, Chew second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried unanimously.
C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving the sale of 0.141 acres of real property as described
herein; authorizing the Mayor to execute the necessary documents
transferring title. D-SS
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 84.179
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SALE OF 0.142 ACRES OF REAL
PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TRANSFERRING TITLE; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Chew motion, Stephens second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye,' Stephens "aye," Alford "aye,"
RLddLesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Hayor Stewart "nay." Motion
carried 6 to 1 with Mayor Stewart casting the "nay" vote.
D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to
t re planned development (FD) district on an approximately 17.1 acre
parcel located at the southwest corner of Paige and Swisher Roads.
2-1694
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 84-180
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING T'IE ZONI%G MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS TO ''ROVIDE FIR A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR APP..OXIMATELI 17.1 ACRES OF LAND, AS
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM AGRICULTURAL (A)
Ss t o ~ yl ~ „rr~ n ~ r~. r ~y r F ro nn y
v
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December I8, 1984
ii Page Twelve
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Riddlesperger notion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," ns "aye," Stephens "nay," Alford
"aye," Rtddlesperger "aye," 1:041W, "aye," and Mayor Stewart "ale."
Motion carried 6 to 1 with Council Member Stephens casting the 'nay"
vote.
E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
approving a change in zoning from the agricultural (A) district to
the planned development (PD) district on a 49.4 acre tract located
on the north side of Shady Shores Road approximately 250 feet west
of Swisher Road. Z-1695
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 84-1.81
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 49.41 ACRES OF LAND, AS
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM AGRICULTURAL (A)
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
Hopkins motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call
vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "nay," Alford "aye,"
Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "nay," and Mayor Stewart "aye." Motion
carried S to 2 with Council Member Stephens and Mayor Pro Teo Chew
casting the "nay" vote..
F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the expenditure of funds by the City of Denton for
hosting a business meeting and banquet for the Texas Municipal
League, Region 8.
Vic Boyer, Administrative Assistant, reported that this ordinance
would authorizinb the expenditure of funds incurred by the city for
hosting the TML Region 8 meeting in January, 1985.
The following ordinance was presented:
NO. 84-182
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS BY THE
CITY OF DENTO.N FOR HOSTING A BUSINESS MEETING AND BANQUET
FOR THE TEXAS MUI~ICIFAL LFAGUE, REGION 8; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Riddlesperger motion, Alford second to adopt the ordinance. Or roll
call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye." Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
8. Resolutions
A. The Council was to have considered approval of a
resolution to amend the vacation/bonus time policy.
This item was removed from the agenda by staff.
B. The Council considered approval of a resolution
postponing the regular Council meeting of January 1, 1985 to January
8, 1985.
P~w
7,P•X,Y,f"+ Ff k ~ 4 ~ .
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1984
Page T irteen
The following resolution was presented:
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the regular Council meeting of the City of Denton
scheduled January 1, 1985 is an official holiday, therefore, it is
necessary that the Council meeting for such date be postponed until
January 8, 1985; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TFXAS:
SECTION I.
That the regular Council meeting to be hell on January 1, 1985
be postponed until January 8, 1985.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 18th day of December, 1984.
RICHARD 0. STEWKKT, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
T.HARLO7Tb AL RN, CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM!
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Stephens motion, Chew second that the resolution be approved. On
roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Stephens "aye," Alford
"aye," Riddlesperger "aye," Chew "aye," and Mayor Stewart "aye."
Motion carried unanimously.
9. The Council received the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report by Arthur Andersen and Company.
John McGrane, Director of Finance, reported that the preliminary
report had been included in the agenda back-up material. Mr. bill
Dillon would distribute the final report and report the findings to
the Council.
Mr. Bill Dillon, representing Arthur Andersen and Company, reported
that the final report was identical In substance and content to the
preliminary report. The only item which was officially from the
auditors was the opinion found on page 8. Page 7 was the Government
Finance Officers Association Certificate of Conformance. Separate
tabs had been provided on pages 80 through 86 for priority
information on the city utilities. The management letter would be
completed for the January 8, 1985 Council meeting.
Council Member Hopkins stated that the report was very well done and
easy to read.
10. The Council considered approval of closing the Wye-
Robertson railroad crossing.
Assistant City Manager Svehla reported that this closing was part of
a Community Develoment Block Grant project. The closing was
recommended as a safety precaution.
Mayor Pro Te■ Chew stated that this was located in his disttict and
he had no objections in view of the safety factors involved.
Chew motion, McAdams second to approve the closing of the Wye-
Robertson railroad crossing. Motion carried unanimously.
.3.a .;,rt n , .s-~ vjd, .ti4ca,,~ :s.r
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of December 18, 1981
Page fourteen
• 11. There was no official action on Executive Session items of
legal matters, real estate, personnel, and board appointments.
12. The following items of new business were suggested by
Council Members for future agendas:
1. Mayor Pro Tea Chew asked for an update on East Prat^ie
Street
2. Council Member Hopkins asked staff to review all of the
traffic signal lights in the city to see if they were appropriately
placed or 3f they should be moved; also to determine if the signals
were aoving or deterring traffic
The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss legal
matters real estate, personnel, and board appointments. No
official action was taken.
With no further items of business, the meeting as adjourned.
KILRKKI) V. , MX=
CRMMMTFTT' , CITY SECRffM
1630C
1.A, yR r V a ,•d r 4 ei ♦ ti w
(Case #Z-1705)
Page 6
ATTACHMENTS
1. Map
2. Oakmont Site Plan
3. Intensity Map
4. PD-12 Site Plan
5. Memoramdum from Jerry Clark
6. Utility Information j
7. Development Standards Sheets
8. Reply Form Totals
1 9. Property Owner List
to Planning and Zoning commission minutes of the meeting of
December 12, 1984.
0906q
irk nr
t ~ r
City Council Minutes
January 3, 196S
The Council convened into the Work Session at 12:00 noon In the City
Manager's Conference Room.
PRESENT: Mayor Stewart; Mayor Pro Tem Chew; Council Members
Alford, Hopkins, McAdams, Riddlesperger, and Stephens
ABSENT: None
1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss
board appointments.
Alford motion, Chew seconl to appoint a Task Force in conjunction
with the street bond election. Motion carried unanimously.
The following were appointed:
TASK FORCE MEMBERS
1. Dr. Bob Toulouse
1. Mr. Hugh Ayer
3. Dr. Darrell Bulls
4. Mr. Bob Benfield
S. Mr. Glenn Davis
6. Mr. Jake Craven
7. Ms. Geneva Barg
S. Mr. Jack Bomar, Jr.
9. Ms. Mary Aan McKenzie
10. Mr. Keith Appleton
11. Ms. Virginia Galiian
12. Dr. Shirley Barrett
13. Mr. Ed Morrison
14. Mr. Jack Miller
15. Mr. Ken Baker
16. Cr. Harold Reed, Jr.
17. Mr. William P. Phillips
I$. Mr. Fred Patterson
19. Mr. Richard Chandler
20. Ms. Janet Harmett
21. Mr. K.C. Orr, Jr.
22. Mr. Bill Brady
23. Mr. Donald Wright, President
24. Mr. Bob Crouch
• 2S. Mrs. Sue Smith League of Wumen Voters
26. Mrs. Eleanor Hughes
• p v ~4 ~ s s> u y.r e r , ~ ~ r '~M i Fp°_' :<4 x . '.=y
City of Denton City Council Minutes
Meeting of January S, 1981
Page Two
• TASK FORCE MEMBERS continuation
• 17. Mrs. Sara LaGrone
28. Mrs. Sue Fickey
29. Mrs. Donna Trammell
30. Mr. Furtis Hollis
31. Mrs. Patricia Lovette
32. Mr. Aon Arrington
33. Mr. Charles Ridens
34. Dr. Roland Vela
35. Mr. Joe Bailey
36. Mr. Crockett Lowrey
37. Mr. H.F. Schaake ,
38. Mrs. Etha Kiker
39. Mr. Russell Hates
40. Dr. Don Smith
41. Mr. Frank Davila
42. Ms. Dorothy Minter
• 43. Ms. Irene Price
44. Mr. Lloyd Hindman
4S. Rev. Bruce Chamberlain
46. Ms. Hazel Fredrick
47. Mr. Ray Roberts
48. Mr. Audley Blackburn
49. Rev. Bill Crouch
S0. Mr. Alton Donsback
S1. Dr. L L. Armstrong
S? Rev. L.E. Lawson
S3. Mr. Allie Miller
S4. Mr. Loren Traeger
With no further Items of business, the meeting was adjourned.
RICHARD n. STEWART, AA 'OR
CHARLOTTE , CYY 1631C
s
v ( '6 .:I,iv ~ a Imo'^iC [r n ,;,Y b ' i "F ' ..m t , ';:y w Y.'.4
DATE: 1/15/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMA
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council.
FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FJR ZONING CASE Z-1705
¢9COMMFVDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1705 by
a vote of 6-1 at its meeting of December 12, 1984.
SUMMARY:
This is a request for an amendment to planned development (^D-12) on
an approximately 78 acre tract located on the west side of I-359
approximately 2,500 feet south of State School Road.
BACKGROUND:
This request is a portion of a planned 765 acre development located
in Corinth and Denton. The commercial zoning proposed in this area
could cause Intensity and traffic problems in this area; however,
the City of Corinth has already approved this request and the project
will probably develop whether this zoning case is approved or not.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recosmended approval of this
request so that the City might have some c^ntrol of the development.
PROGRAMS. DEo RTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not %pplicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respect 11 ubmi to
•
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by-
/b1.*": '
Denise Spi ey(-
Development Review Planner
AP ove
Jett
Director boe P Nat, Ing
and Cosmunity Development
09518
dt.n~Y. .k v ,ppa .x~ 1R. r ..n ✓ .ENV ,c'h4 nn cnl*.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
i
TO: Denton City Council I
i Case No.: Z-1705 Meeting Date: January 15, 1985
i
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Myers Development Corporation
1200 Shady Shores Drive
Corinth, Texas 76205
Status of Applicant: Prospective owner and developac
Requested Action: An amendment of an existing
planned development (PD-12) which
permits the following land uses:
1. Office use - 10.9 acres
2. Recreational area - 20.6 acres
3. Hotel - 10.1 acres
4. Retail shopping - 5.5 acres i
5. Cultural use - 4.6 acres
6. Malti-family - 21.1 acres
7. Single faAly - 5.2 acres
j If approved, the planned develop-
ment (PD) amendment will permit
the following land uses:
1. Cluster homes - approximately
i 80 units on 13.2 acres with a
density of 6 units per acre.
2. Single family - approximately
21 units on 5.2 acres with a
density of 4 units per acre.
3. b"alti-family - approximately
360 units on 15 acres with a
density of 24 units per acre.
4. Commercial shopping - approxi-
mately 44.5 acres.
4 fr
s
(Case #Z-1705)
Page 2
i
GENERAL INFORMATION (Continued)
Location and Size: Au approximately 78 acre tract
located on the west side of 1-35E
approximately 2,500 feet south of
State School Road.
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Surrounding Land Use
and Zoning: North - Car dealership; C. A
South - Vacant; outside city
limits.
East - I-35L; A
West - Vacant; outside city limits'
Denton Development Guide: Area is not covered by Development
Guide.
SPECIAL INFORMATION -t
Drainage: Detention should be used for
drainage across 1-711SE to the east
to negate the effectz of this i
development.
Transportation: This site has frontage on I-35E, a
primary major arterial. The pro- c
posed single family section of
this development has frontage on
State School Road, a primary major
arterial.
{ Utilities: Sae attached for utility
information on this tract.
j Ele.itric. telephone zad gas
service is available to this site.
ANALYSIS
1 The 765 acre propc td Oakmont development site is located on
the southeastern edge of the City of Detston. The site con-
tains approximately 205 acres (27%) of the total development
i within the city limits of Denton and approximately 560 acres
n.
3 „r . r1s i .Y,'. e~ N a' c f 4 "4P 9 S ' n_s_ s :-f d t f . ; `i ; 1 p:: r ,
Y.., ~Y:S1 F Kx+
Y. ~tF ~ d y n ~ ;'.p h
(Case U-1705)
Page 3
ANALYSIS (Continued)
(73X) of the t,)tal development within the city limits of
Corinth. Dual jurisdiction over the site has caused some
problems in the review and evaluation of this project. The
developers have received zoning approval from the City of
Corinth and are awaiting Denton 's decision in this matter.
Historically, the City of Denton has experienced, to a large
extent, spatially balanced urban growth. In recognition of
this pattern, the Development Guide has proposed an integrate
framework of high and moderate intensity nodes which mesh with
a network of primer yy and secondary major arterial roads with
the objective of achievins and maintaining a workable land
use/transportation balance. Spatial balance in the city's
growth is important to achieve optimum efficiency in the
operation of public services and facilities including
transportation and utility systems.
The proposed Oakmont development constitutes a major ahift in
this balanced growth pattern to the southeast. This spatial
shift of emphasis has raised the following issues for
consideration:
1. The I-35E corridor offirs attractive housing sites for
commuters who work In the Dallas area. The Oakmont devel-1
opment will absorb all of the land in the c.'.ty limits
bordering the highway thereforfurther developments in
this area will take p ace in Corinth and adjoining areas
i to the south.
2. The proposed development will form a moderate to high
intensity node. :his node is located near a large high
intensity node (the Golden Triangle Mall area) and a
planned moderate intensity node (Mayhill - State School
Road - 1-35E area) which is over the standard for that
j area. The approval and development of this commercial
area will result in a contiguous high intensity area
along the southside of 1-35E extending from Loop 288 to I
Corinth.
3. The proliferation of nigh intensity developments along
I this section of 1-35E may • jult in a traffic problem in
this area. 1-35E is the i .ogle most important link
between Denton and Dallas. Future economic growth and
i development could be adversely affected by traffic
( congestion on this artery. The nature and extent of
ultimate development in this corridor will require the I
development of additional infrastructure. The existing
and proposed road network will need to be examined
further to consider alleviating possible traffic
congestion.
i
I. M 5i ':1 S1 +,a w1 it f + g .t
a t ~ta a4 -.!s mb ".0 1 Vwe f .,h !
(Case #Z-1705)
Page 4
ANALYSIS (Continued)
Although they apply primarily to the development as a whole, i
there are several positive factors concerning the proposed
development that should be explored:
1. This development provides a relatively new dimension in
urban design in residential areas. The concept plan pro-
vides for 20.3% of the site to be used for a golf course
intended to accomodate both active and passive forms of
recreational activities. These greenbelt areas will also
serve to enhance the protection of natural floodplain
areas and at the same time create a better quality resi-
dential neighborhood.
2. The development also provides for a mixture of housing !
types ranging from single family detached houses with a
density of three units per acre to multi-family areas
with a density of twenty-four units per acre. Diversity
of housing is a foal of the Denton Development Guide and
will accomodate a range of lifestyles and income groups.
3. The development's large size allows for greater coordina-
tion and integration in its design and implementation as
opposed to small scale piece-meal projects.
l
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission is concerned about the {
establishment of a moderate to high intensity node not '
recognized by the Development Guide and the upsetting of the
spatially balanced growth typically enjoyed by Denton in tha
past; however, there is another issue to be considered.
Approximately 73% of the total 765 acre development has
already been approved by the City of Corinth and will
probably develop +hether this zoning case is approved or
not. That development will affect Denton even though it is
located in the city limits of Corinth. The Planning and
Zoning Commission would prefer to have some control over the
development and for that reason recommends approval of Z-1705
by a vote of 6-1 with the following conditions:
1. That permitted land uses in each zoning classification,
setbacks, height limits, lot coverage, floor area ratios,
lot widths, lot depths, lot areas and parking requirement
will conform to the standards listed on the attached
sheets.
2. That the following land uses are specifically prohibited
in the commercial area of this development:
~+-~r r ~ a (1 ~ fa~ 2 i Y A, ry ::1 { 'ry r Artie `'r r fr IN.
t
(Case #z-1705)
Page 5
RECOMMENDATION (Continued)
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming HousF:
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery, etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
r Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
3. That a traffic impact study will be required at a time to be
determined by the Transportation Engineer.
-
L
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve petition with conditions
2. Approve petition with additional conditions
3. Approve petition without conditions
4. Deny petition
t
r r.wv f Y _ ' e rC r. . > i p T, v~ J~ o ~7, ~ ::'r r c r .
AGENDA: MINUTES:
NA.m: CI'T'Y OF _DENTON CITY COUNCIL
DAY
7'01l:: s ao~ t
PLACE '4 JP
d1E,~itlhltS NOTATIONS YES NO
Richard -Stewart 392-3225 y/
Joe Alford _ 387-4373
Mark Chew 383-1083 j/
Charles Tlopkjus 566-3031
James kiddlesperger 382-8757
~.G rte. volo,
Ray Stephens r6 -3340
- r
MEAL SERVILE YES NU
NOTIFY PRbSS
Denton Record Chronicle 120
hDNI 138
Channel 25 175
THU Lass-L) 178
NT Daily 565-2353
KNTU 565-3688
Denton County Enterprise 137
Dallas 1,inu:s Herald 566-0593
0166C
[n r
1. f ~ S;: : r r n p. `1
qn rl a _ rt '.h wa
EMERGENCY AGENDA ADDENDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
January IS, 1985
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of a resolution amending City of
Denton policies and procedures.
C E R r I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeti:3 was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Nall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the ,iay of -)t 1984,5 at 1H o' c lock
(a, m. , c p, n.
(Y'
CITY SrCRHARY
ib3 tr;
n 'H r. 1~~~ r pe ,9F r ~~'d la , r g K+. .n. 5 t' ~ 1 f
rr X61' ; 1 1' k'C: ~'4r M1S ~r~='
14C AA .i t *rt;
~i '~0 ~ 1 • f 1
sr . ' 1 c 1 J t.
p r
n
/ozhf Rd.
7
-4 W)
` f . }
t Y'' • 1
7 214,
y
f~ t -R ♦ oebrl Ad Q! I Oli0p 2POI
00([
S.HAd3Y SHORE
raft lone r- t'0P Sib
! too end.
i Aran d. ~
• Il R D:ns~n ~ l'11
lolie1•\:Cfoo k Rd. ` Mew i ) c~
~-4
CORINTH ~r~ ' ✓ P
POP 461 x_
i s `Ira ' old
!1 +rr//A~~A..__ 1 33t V,l
b
~~or,Jy,2CIA, ♦ ~ I : ~ , 1 •1 1
G~ 1 %s r S f ~ S I
A LAKE
0 1 0,.. '4.~. POP I,431
~l a ~,'1 r 11 y 1
1 •'YM31i~e' for ` 1 0 - f' GREEit a> .
_ . , 01 2 3
30
-40 COPPER g A V yu
III, 'AN Y 0 N fr i' d K% i
1 POc t40!E,tl ~ a~.f;`I .¢cr_ t'i ''Y I
1 rr. ! r ~ f i 1~
J .4.'
11. t
r j/f
J4o~, t ~3 .a; o rlS
HIGHLAND L!,
DOUBLE OAK ~ VILLAGE , •
PoO2ooitST4 S 001) sit , - OenionNOI' r,,.~ t,,
9 U
~ 4 r v.
S 4
-
's f
z- fzos
D MOPM M DATA
11r 1. . .rl. e..Y l«
lItN4MhIt i ~ I
.r
1/IIg 14!04/ug+ON 6.40 It l l0 ~ fl l~ ~
1'gIb t4lN4 10«441 04040 . I 1 t U 44 / .1144144 I JJ r
40r-o1r'g NN1 21.1111.0 141
fIj l f
CelarrYl 011M t. • of 14rtt' 1' r'^ /rr 1
kw 41x44 . Iwtu11 ! GI
WII.IYg441IM0W 1l 10 6001,10411 1 1 , wl'11'
10611 1I1a 1 4 Ll% 4u11M
t1!/Y00 ««t,0 q , U J I e Id
~'~y
100 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 I l k
It..'►r 1.M •4r y. 1
o1nK 1 premiss 1 114,09 pray 111046f •
tNti/L 444Nr1O4
nlY ` M1w1 't'r
11 1 moo"
It N tM« 6 bN 11.1
H Y
r4r4 11.1 iee lu1 G I ♦1'
IMI .
~0r rj
rn I . 1
Y WAY/Y ..YwI .YN ti W. \
1l
MxM Y.Y.Y YNIY/W YM J' 'WM Y'1' r.N'rV ;4440 \
PO N 1,11.011 o14tt
r gM IIMA
1'4rY 11 ` 4YI IIM61 It
1r
rr.wt IYYq MtnN 1. - r
nM SIT
I
l }
Glor rrMgFY
Ir• si 1
n 'Fg' r 1!
9-So
rJ• 1' 4 .4!
f t 1~ +•r w^
'J{•y~t1 Ov
11 sof.1 1 Ir .1
to. Sow I.S.
7E Ar 1 w:i move~ ?I I
HI01 Ur '1' ur
MMh It14i 110 f11
'EMI : 0 two :r11M li
g
94 U t
Io
1wg r•" 1 n11g14.v A
110 110• I aYl CNIe L GM 44, ,441.11
1 .nl •1•' 1041 Y
IN
i
poll 101111 L. .Y 1.40.6.1.
I 11.1 N I III IIrNA Memo,
1 I. nor;
1 1.M *,I- Ii1 r.:
I ` Cww 1111106
1 1 111jth MN(a 1A w
1 t 14.0 It .\+1 .
s 11 - \I 1/ ~1 ~ ,
<IYI i
V
I stela owe.
t 1) n. Zoning ExhAlt for:
61 4400 0010o1 N momo.1r/
OAKMONT
jt/4swY1►111 ti; 7 1. ! Donfom/ Corinth. Tom
~,IN ~M 1 ~7M I1 1, 1 410114100M4g1 Imp, n '
146160 b4
~'~!1►NY 'M41t64 M4~41 iM l ~rM 4814
L u 1,1 gr - • •Ir / •4 11144. r4rn nI4rN 4r 1«.~ fY
J fl r r AmI .1 • 441664
114nr1q twt
111We t, M'r' M I/1110«1041
t b 101«, }slog1 U «
w r• , lb N1rl
n
1
it
I s 4 ~ i I 1
so 0
L 1,
aaI r t• _ J
t 1
t w ax
%TW
Y \ \
r • ,
8,T«4
Y
} I 1
r~fre
lit i tfi`rb.n' o~ hiqh to
W ~4 agree
endenersing nve 3a►, tr
t ire?^s h r ~o r Ea i~yV. r pn,.p> '~4 T ~ T', ~K~ °c ~ + 6 Sal a 1. ~ Fa +f *li i 7r 'lrc '~~~`rs r
PD-i2 SiteP tth
J
I
\v 1 1 J
l 11 1 •
i Y
~ " } , ` T'-.-`~+r-+~--,cam , -K...
.k-
\ f`~ ;lei ~ J ~
7 1.11
r 11a > f k~ i FyT ~t ik A A~ : ,'iS ::r 1 r i,A i ~r ,r n e Y Yid 4 A T t S 4,.
CITY of DENrON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON, TEXAS 76101 TELEPHONE (817} 566.8200
M E M O R A N D U M
i
DATE: December 4, 1984
TO: Denise Spivey, Development Review Planner
FROM. Jerry Clark, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Oakmont
Several issues have been presented to Myers Development on the
Oakmont Subdivision.
1) Loop 238 in the powerline easement on a western corner -
requires 120' right-of-way
2) Thoroughfare from Corinth ties to Robinson Road. 80'
Right-of-way as shown is acceptable along with location
3) Thoroughfare on south boundary line with 100,
right-of-way should be in proper place and adequate size
to extend into Denton
4) Detention should be used with golf course lakes for
drainage to south. (Recommendation)
5) Detentlon should be used for drainage across I-35 to
north to negate efforts of development. Apply to all
tracts in Denton as requirement
b) Sidewalks along collector sized or groater streets as per
subdivision regulations.
Je r a k, P.E.
Cie E41 neer
is
N0269E
i
I
N.hp t4 Ix !b 1 7 n y.x 'Wr e~ t 1 w, A"1 7y) f Y (t fr.:Q`it _
r ar t.q Ept
9s ~ r ~ . e d ~ ~n
Oakmont Utility information
1. A review of the sanitary sewer system available for this
portion of the development within the City Limits would only
permit the 43.4 Acres of Commercial Siopp- nee and about 120
units of residential use, either clusterhouses, single family,
or multifamily. Additional capacity may need to be added in
existing lift station.
2. Any further tie on to the Denton sanitary sewer system by
Developers would require either (1)a properly sized sewerline
from this development to: the Pecan Creek Treatment Plant(21"
size plus oversizidg; to a 27" size with city participation)
or (2) sufficient money placed, in escrow to construct a future
equivalent 21" size with city participation to 27" size.
In this second case, Developer could tie on to existing 24"
Hickory Creek Interceptor at this time.
3. The existing 141/12" waterlines serving Corinth and wimbleton
Village are sufficient to serve this development. Loopinq
of 12" size would be necessary to insure proper water distri-
bution and compiiai,ce with Hogan and Rasor master plan for the
City of Denton.
4. Any portion outside City Limits required for approval at this
time will need Public Utility Board, Planninq and Zoning,
and City Council approval.
5. Pro Rata charges will be required alonq 21" sanitary sewer
interceptor at 1-35.
6. Pro Rata agreements may be approved by the Dublic t]tility
Board for offsite developer investments for water and sewerline.
• T11 V Y ! A k!
r;- ♦4~ y 3 ~rA l d ! fi .f? n: W y .N tJ;e ♦ na 4 fi . „
r~t`CT° a,~, ~q ! r f tl,
1 f
$X~I~O~,Ei FA~1l~LY HOMES
D2VI.KITION:
Single Family dwelling units are another form of detached
housing. These residential areas are designed to provide single
family housing at a higher density than permitted in the Estate
! 'come areas. These residential lots will have access and frontage
on a private or public road. Typically, these units will be one
and two story structures.
PMITTED USES
Single family dwellings as outlined herein
All uses as permitted in the Estate Home areas. Reference
Estate Home "Permitted Uses"
REQUI REMELTS r
Height Requirementst No building shall exceed thirty-six
R) feet or two and one-half (2-1/2) stories in height.
s -
Area Requirements:
Front Yard - There shall be a front yard having a
required depth of not less than twenty-five (25)
feet.
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than five (5)
feet. A side yard adjacent to a street shall not be
less than fifteen (15) feet.
Rear Yard - There shall be a rear yard having a depth
of not ~less than twenty (20) feet.
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than seven-thousand, seven-hundred
(7,700) square feet.
Lot Width - The average width of any lot shall not be
' less than seventy (70) feet.
Lot Depth - The average depth of the lot shall not be
less than one-hundred, ten (110) feet, except that a
corner or cul-de-sac lot may have less depth provided
that the iinimum depth is no less than one-hundred
(100) feet.
Minimum Dwell~ing~S_i_z_e - The minimum floor area of any
dwelling un t si hall be one -thousand, f.i.ke-hundred
(1,500) square feet.
~ f
8
:z r p~ n.k,°p N' ~ crM1 dy 'k:(El k. r + w
'ar o %4 }4i*~,ra3 h"i bi T~~'6+ 'r1' ~y 1~ .r a;fie 4 ~~..ir •f'~ 1.~,~9.
1 u c . f, Cd ♦ .~f~ 44 1 R
',Lot Coverage - In no case shall more than forty-five
45 percent of the total lot area be covered by tho
A combined area of the main buildings and accessory
buildings.
Parking Requirements- A minimum of two (2) 'off-street
parking spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
NOTEt
As a part of the above parking requirements, an
enclosed garage shall be provided for each dwelling
unit. This enclosed garage area shall be of
sufficient size to accomodate one car or a garage
space of at least twelve (12) by twenty (20) feet.
BuildingMaterialst All dwelling units shall be
constructed of masonry, stucco, or of a glass building
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
•Residentia.l Densitvt
Density - These residential areas will provide for a
maximum of 3.5 dwelling units per acre.
NOTES All calculations for development intensities
shall he based on the gross area for each tract as
indicated on the Zoning Exhibit.
R
r
a
t
i , ' d tx + xfi+', a ~.e i{d7 Rai°MS r„
~2 •7' rrR i ~r , "'+CY <<:~ f . y t~'F' e ti~ 'F ~ .e df' f fi P.~' 'F~i 4,fi''
yvyy 9 ~ fv '~,kr t ;r y f P p
A~An it"TB /Cdl1DON I N I UM S
R 09FI iITION s
%
Apartments and/or Condominiums will provide another form of
multi-family housing. These multi-family units will consist of
flats (single level units) and studios (two level units) or a
combination thereof. The apartment or condominium structures
will range from two (2) units per building to sixteen (16) units
per building. Occupancy of the apartment units will be based on
a rental or lease agreement of the interior unit only. Ownership
of the condominium units will be in the form of fee simple
ownership of the living unit only. These apartment and/or
condominium areas are usually located adjacent to major streets
and -serve as a buffer or transition from office/commercial
development or heavy automobile traffic and medium or low density
residential development.
PERMITTED USESs
Multi-family units as outlined herein
All uses as permitted in the Villa areas
NOTES All lesser and different uses as permitted within
the Apartmont areas shall be governed by the requirements
as set forth for that particular type of use
REQUIRDWNTS s
Height Requirements No building shall exceed forty (40)
feet or two and one-half (2-1/2) stories in height.
Area Requirements
Front Yard - There shall be a front yard having a
required depth of not less than twenty (20) feet.
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard on each side
9 uolhe-lot having a width of not less than ten (10)
feet. A building seperation of fifteen (15) feet
shall be observed between structures. A side yard
adjacent to a street shall not be less than fifteen
(15) feet.
Rear Yard - There shall be a rear yard having a depth
of not less than twenty (20) feet.
NOTES Apartment/Condominium units shall have a
minimum setback of thirty-five (35) feet from any
single family use.
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less thin sixteen-thousand (16,000) square
feet.
.f J
f^^
20
i
'i
rr fix, r, 4"r ~ 4 yr ( ~v
y 4 ti~y 7 y e~ ,
wrH ELY b~l^'7YT+' y+~`4
~z
Lot Width - The average width of the lot shall not be
less than ninety (90) feet.
r r. 1
,Lot_Desth -The average depth of the lot shall not be
less than ninety (90) feet.
Minimum Dwellin Size - The minimum floor area of any
` dw 11 ng un t shall be five-hundred (500) square feet
for flats (single level units) and seven-hundred,
fifty (750) square feet for studios (two level
units),
Lot Coverage - in no case shall more than fifty (50)
percent of the total. lot area be covered by the
combined area of the main buildings.
Parking Require~nen A minimum of two (2) parking
spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit,
Suildins_Materialst All dwelling units shall be
co n tCu' ted of `m'asonry, stucco, or of a glass bui Laing
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
Residential Densitvs
Density - These residential areas will provide for a
maximum of 24.0 dwelling units per acre. The specific
number of dwelling units per acre for each
apartment/condominium tract is indicated on the
Zoning Exhibit.
NOM All calculations for development intensities
shall be based on the gross area for each tract as
indicated on the Zoning Exhibit.
21
,
r
i
s
J r°'~~ .J~4.'! y' ✓ 7. 1. .y i rii I y'MYf + u
CL!U _ _ 8
J,,, D~INITION:
P
"a Cluster Homes consist of single family detached units that
'4' 1 are clustered in groups of a slightly higher density than
conventional single family homes. This concept promotes a higher
density in the area that is actually developed while creating
open space which may be commonly owned and maintained by the
homeowners. Ownership of these homes would involve the units as
well as the lot on which the units are sited. These lots would
have front, rear and side yards. Typically, these units would be
' one and two story structures.
PERMITTED USES:
' Single family dwellings as outlined herein
' All uses as permitted in the Single Family areas
RJ*UIR7 4ENTS 3
Height Requirements: No building shall exceed thirty-
four feet or two (2) stories in height.
Area
Regui cements:
Front Yard - There shall be a front yard having a
required depth of not less than twenty-five (25)
feet.
Side Yard - There shall be a side yard on each side
of the lot having a width of not less than five (5)
feet. A side yard adjacent to a street shall not be
less than ten {10) feet.
t Rear Yard - 'there shall be a rear yard having a depth
4 o`f not-less than ten (10) feet.
Lot Area - No building shall be constructed on any
lot of less than four-thousand, five-hundred (4,500)
square feet.
Lot Width - The average width of any lot shall not be
less than fifty (50) feet.
Lot Depth - The average depth of the lot shall not be
less than ninety (90) feet, except that a corner or
,,cul-de-sac lot may have less depth provided that the
minimum depth is not less than eighty-five (85) feet.
Minimum Dwelling Size - The minimum floor area of any
dwelling unit shall be one-thousand, two-hundred,
fifty (1,250) square feet.
10
` y,.i ~lj
F
Yf
yr; Lot Coverage - In no case shall mere than sixty (60)
percent of the total lot area be covered by the
comb.kned area of the main buildings and accessory
buildings.
Parking Rn~uirementss A minimum of two (2) off-street
parking spaces shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
NOTRi
As a part of the above parking requirements, an
enclosed garage shall be provided for each dwelling
unit. This enclosed garage area shall be of
sufficient size to accomodate one car or a garage
space of at least,twelve (12) by"twenty (20) feet.
Building-Materials: All dwelling units shall be
constructed of masonry, stucco, or of a glass building
material of the kind usually used for outside wall
construction, to the extent of at least seventy-five (75)
percent of the area of the outside walls.
s Residential Densitys
Density - These residential areas will provide for a
maximum of 6.0 dwelling units per acre.
4
3 NOTE: All calculations for development intensities
r shall be based on the gross area for each tract as
indicated on the Zoning Exhibit.
` ll
i
g+ v t..,~✓'±~i 'MIT F ~i 3 ~ r 1 S,'n7 t t f { L n' L t,lt. > T "f ei.~ yfk~i Mr s ~.~t rv q 1. a 5
t ~'Y ^ sr., C f z k_ i 1G~ 4r ba 4 tY ` F w •3 . t Yf'
i r;
`$NOPPIN(3
4 D"i*ITION:
Commercial shopping areas provide for medium intensity
concentrations of commercial shopping and related office
activities which may serve the entire community but do not and
should ''not locate in the central business district or the
neighborhood shopping areas.
PM MITTED USES:
" All uses as permitted in the Office areas
NOTE: All lesser and different uses as permitted within
the Commercial Shopping areas shall be governed by the
requirements as set forth for that particular type of use
Agricultural supplies store
' Antique shop
• a'Art gallery
' Automobile and truck rental
' Automobile display - sales/repair (dealership only)
' Auto parts sales (indoor)
" Bicycle shops and repair service
' Boat display - sales/repair (dealership only)
' Building materials sales
' Car washing service
i
' Commer.1al amusement (indoor)
' Department or discount stores
' Distribution center (no outside storage)
' Equipment sales
' Fitness center
proten food lockers (excluling slaughtering)
` Purni'sure sales
' Home improvement store
' Hospital
29
i e v ntlt ~ 11 Y w, n he
r ~e7 rh n./" ~ , i'~~". .fi~,1R. Y'.sh h •,Vj' M'~~ +rnki- E~~. "'V1 r~+NYt F~ 9gi•Yv'g ~t wi ~ ~"''mss e , ; F ,
~ y1 a i^f ~ a '
ka Hbtel or motel
y k'' Household furnishing and fixture store
t' Mars transit commuter pick up service
n .Y 4
' Meat, fish, or
poultry markets (excluding slaughtering and
fish cleaning)
r Motorcycle sales and service (dealership only)
Music stores
Paint sales/wallpaper/interior decorating sales (inside)
' Pet store (no outside runs)
' Plumbing shop (no outside storage)
i Restaurant (with drive-through window)
'Retail stores (indoor)
'''`'Service station
' Sign graphics shop (indoor use only)
' Sporting goods store
' Super,aarket
' Telephone exchange
' Theater (indoor)
c
' Tires, batteries, and accessories (no outside storage/sales)
' Upholstery shop
I ' Uses similar to the above mentioned permitted uses,
provided activities conducted observe the requirements of
all City ordinances,
F ' Temporary buildings and uses incidental to construction
work on the premises, which shall be removed upon the
completion or abandonment of construction work.
' Such uses as may be permitted by means of Specific Use
Permits
i
a
30
,h
} ~ t f ° ; w Vr a r w y...~a r' N ° V. q = vr5,
y iiMa , "t~tt'M1.~ 4v i ~F.~,rp,A, ~1 ~r. •e~.~7'~ ~ k, F,« '~e~ ~'c..~-', d ~
Y ~ a~.u y4 's
a
FHdi ht Re uirementsi No commercial building shall exceed
two and o he-half 2-1/2) stories or thirty-six (36) feet
in h;+ight.
4 Area Requirementst
Front Yard - There shall be a front yard having a
minimum depth of twenty-five (25) feet.
Side Yard - A side yard of not less than fifteen (15)
feet in width shall be provided.
Rear Yard - No rear yard is required.
Landscaped Open Space - Five (5) percent of the total
3 lot area shall be maintained as landscaped open
space.
Lot Coverage - In no case shall more than fifty (50)
pezcent of the total lot area be covered by the
oombined area of the main buildings and accessory
buildings.
Floor Area Ration The ratio of total floor area of all
buildings to total land area shall be a maximum of lil.
NOTE: All calcualtions for development intensities or
' maximum floor areas shall be ',»sed on the gross area for
each tract as indicated on the oning Exhibit.
Building Materialst All main building exteriors shall be
constructed of glass, stone, brick, tiles, cement,
concrete, or similar materials, or any combination
thereof.
E!arking Requirementst one (1) off-street parking space
shall be provided for each two-hundred (200)
square feet of floor space used for retail trade.
K
µ
t
u
}
k
31
e4 r ~4 ti ~i~ s..
?k., µ~~7 ~?s '.~A Y J~wcK jiaf-'t t ♦ i.te~Y ry r 7 yx ;}w ~i "M1 c' ;'f^'
PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS
CITY COUNCIL
Z-1705
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED
None Received None Received
<16.~ 7 'E:', i.. t i9Qe 4 ~ c ~ f i:'!r X 1 ~ .a e=r3~^4'+i..+~~'.+
Ai Ile
KAutze2 'I
IOA
•
\ / I
' Y
r
roll
Xj "I
941
5A J V)
c
Y
7 ~
♦
1i • r
iL
. Lt
r r
r+
12 ILL
CVO
yr
AIL4 7,5(-,
r
P 6 Z Minutes
December 12, 1984
Page 5
B. Z-1705. This is the petition of Myers Development
Corporation requesting an amendment of planned develop-
ment (PD-12) on an approximately 78 acre tract located
UNAPPROVED) on the west side of Interstate 35-E approximately 2,500
feet south of State School Road. The currently approved
planned development permits the following uses:
Hotel and Restaurant Eite
Office Site
Recreation Area
Cultural Center
The proposed amendment includes the following land uses:
Cluster Homes - approximately 80 units on 13.2 acres
with a density of 6 units per acre
Single Family - approximately 21 units on 5.2 acres
with a density of 4 units per acre
Commercial Shopping - approximately 44.5 acres
Multi-Family - approximately 360 units on 15 acres
with a density of 24 units per acre
Ms. Spivey stated that 16 notices were mailed to prop-
erty owners; one reply form was received in favor, one
reply form was received in opposition.
Cu,,-is Hawley, representing Myers Development Corpora-
stated that Oakmont is a joint venture; their
pi, eal is for a residential development backing up
to t country club development supported by commercial
but_tiesses and neighborhood shops. Quality and size
of homes would blend well with what Denton has already
experienced on that side of town. He presented a slide
show of similar developments in other cities and stated
that Mr. Myer operates all country clubs he acquires and
plans to do that with this one. On question, Mr. Hawley
said their plans are to immediately develop the golf
course and country club, that they do riot construct
residences unless they feel there is a problem economi-
cally. On further question, tie said they do have deed
restrictions; they also exercise architectural control
to maintain integrity. The.A feel they can attract
people who would like the lifestyle offered. He said
their research indicates that most of purchasers will
be from the Denton area, others might be those who would
otherwise go to the Carrollton or Plano area. He said
this is not intended to be a private type development;
a person can live in Oakmont and not be a member of the
country club or can be a member of country club and not
live in Oakmont. On question from Chairman, tie said
that Denton Independent School District has their site
plan and they are committed to reserving school sites
if it is found to be desirable.
r f It~r i k r ~o
P & Z Minutes
December 4
12, 1984
Page 6
Craig Curry, land planner for the project, stated that
Oakmont development contains approximately 773 acres and
outlined the 206 acre area within the City of Denton.
He said that City of Corinth had already approved the
area within its boundaries. He explained roads serving
the development and advised that existing PD-12 front-
ing I-35E would be amended to tie into overall project.
The plan commercial shopping and neighborhood shops
y
with office and apartment/condo/cluster housing devel-
opment as a transition to single family residential.
They plan to use natural breaks such as TP&L and drain-
age easements as dividers. Mr. Sidor asked about ingress
and egress to I-35E from the commercial shopping and
Mr. Curry said they are not showing any point of access
at this time, that this is only a concept plan and they
will come back prior to issuance of building permits
for specific site plan approval. On question from
Mr. LaForte, Mr. Curry said they have no problem with
staff's recommendation which prohibits certain commer-
cial uses.
No one spoke in opposition to the request.
Mr. Persaud continued staff report stating that this
project will have a total population of about 10,000;
that this development will use all available land bor-
dering the highway to the south in the City of Denton
and will put Denton in position of not being able to
attract future development along this corridor. He said
that Development Guide designates a high intensity node
(Golden Triangle mall area), there is a planned moderate
intensity node (Mayhill, State School Road, 1-35E area)
which is over the standard for that area. The proposed
development will form an additional moderate to high
intensity node and will result in a contiguous high
intensity area along south side of 1-35 extending from
Loop 288 to Corinth. This commercial corridor will
generate about 530,000 trips and staff predicts there
will be a severe problem with bumper to bumper traffic
on 1-35E trying to take those 530,000 trips. He sug-
gested an integrated thoroughfare plan focusing on the
development's intensity.
Mr. Juren commented that Corinth has already approved
project, that problem exists with the approved high and
moderate intensity areas. The total situation could
cause alot of congestion on I-35E and problem will
increase as development goes on farther south. He
suggested studying expansion project for 35. on ques-
tion about trip generation studies if portion of devel-
opment in Denton is not approved, Mr. Persaid said staff
does not believe approval by Denton will add alot of
additional traffic generation. On further question,
Mr. Persaud said developer will pay for water and sewer
lines. Mr. Ellison advised that many problems would be
resolved in platting stages, that there has been some
.R i3'gr t.Sr XI~Wh n r v~.`w,y 4 M1V r 4 rr..orb r r: 1 Sk 1 Y. Y > A 4 - r3 'Ye (*.,tier .Y a*s.
rv . "rF rj F f r`r
P 6 Z Minutes
December 123, 1984
Page' 7
effort made for thoroughfare planning between the two
cities, that that may have to be looked at further.
Mr. LaForte suggested taking into consideration where
impacting existing areas of Denton, that undue burden
should not be placed on people who are already in
Denton. Mr. Pearson asked if there was a provision in
city's code for developer to pick up fair portion of
widening streets as will be additional traffic burden
on 2181, also Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley/35.
Mr. LaForte said that has not been done in the past.
Mr. Pearson said he felt this sort of thing should be
addressed in the future and Ffr. Ellison replied that
it is being addressed.
Mr. Olyai said that majority of traffic generated by
commercial areas will be dumped onto 1-35, that there
is a problem now at peak hours and two lanes will not
be able to carry additional traffic. He recommended
that a traffic impact study be required with developer
showing how they plan to disburse that traffic.
Mr. Sidor suggested that during platting process addi-
tional right-of-way might be needed on some streets.
Mr. Olyai said right-of-way for additional turn lanes
might be needed, that impact study would show what was
needed.
Ms. Spivey pointed out as positive aspects of the devel-
opment that proposed golf course will enhance protection
of natural floodplain areas; that development does pro-
vide for a mixture of housing which is a goal of Denton
Development Guide; that a large scale development as
proposed allows for greater coordination and integration
in its design and implementation. She continued that
73 percent of development has already been approved by
City 'of Corinth and most likely will be built and will
affect Denton whether portion in Denton is approved or
not. Therefore, staff would prefer to have some control
over development and recommends approval subject to
deletion of some uses allowed in commercial classifi-
cation and subject to development standards as listed
by developer with the exception of parking in commer-
cial areas which should be 1:200 rather than 1:250 as
proposed. Mr. Sidor asked about parking ratio at Golden
Triangle mall and Ms. Spivey answered that it met cur-
rent zoning ordinance requirement of 1:200. Chairman
questioned alignment of Loop 288 and Mr. Clark said that
was still being considered by City Council.
P & 'L Minutes
December 12, 1984
Page '8
Mr. Curry said thoroughfares are shown as indicated on
approved thoroughfare plan for City of Denton. He said
that engineering staff had been consulted in both Denton
and Corinth; that proposed alignment of collectors coin-
cide with both cities and conform to thoroughfare plans.
He said he felt right-of-way should be brought up in
platting stages, not at zoning. He said they have a
community which will be somewhat self-contained, that
they are developing roadways within their community.
He said that utility capacity would also be worked out
at platting, they have looked and feel they are within
guidelines. He said they are not wanting to do a
traffic study at this time, that this is a long term
project and they expect a good deal of residential
development will take place before commercial. They
are trying to get golf course underway at this time.
He said he felt those issues could be resolved at a
later date, that commercial/office development could
be ten years in the future. He said traffic study
conditions would change. They will be coming back with
site plan on specific areas as development occurs. They
feel if they do not develop in an orderly manner they
will not ba able to sell with the type of development
they are trying to attract. He said they have no
problem with limited commercial uses and no problem with
parking ratio of 1:200.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. LaForte moved to recommend approval of Z-1705 with
the following conditions:
1. That permitted land uses in each zoning classifica-
tion, setbacks, height limits, lot coverage, floor
area ratios, lot widths, lot depths, lot areas and
parking requirements will conform to the standards
as proposed by developer with exception of parking
ratio in commercial area to be 1:200 rather than
1:250.
2. That the following land uses are specifically
prohibited in the commercial area of this
development:
r
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip
or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
~^¢k= rLeR 4 81 . b 'O, °fi x .3: d~ i.C ` 4 y 3 r a „r.1T x > e > q u. y 1 7rs
s °V d
P & Z Minutes
December 12, 1984
Page 9
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Caliche, Stone,
Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or
Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery, etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances
Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
3. That a traffic impact study will be done within a
reasonable period of time, transportation engineer
to determine what reasonable period of time will be.
Seconded by Mr. Pearson and carried b-1. Mr. Escue
i-ted no stating that he is primarily opposed to
concentration of commercial along I-35E.
5'.
NO. .
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
FOR THE PURCHASE Or MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES;
PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated
competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip.
swat, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of
state law and City ordinances; and
I
WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has
j reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the
lowest responsible bids for the materials equipment, supplies
or services as shown in the "Bid Proposalsl' submitted therefor;
and
WHEtIAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget
for the apptopriation of funds to be used for the purchase of
the owterials, equipment, supplies or services approved and
accepted herein; and
WRMLEAS, Section 2.36 (f) of the Code of Ordinances requires
that the City Council approve all expenditures of more than
. $3,000; and
NHUZAS, Section 2.09 of the City Chartar requires that
every act of the Council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL Or THE CITY OT DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS:
I
SECTION I.
That the numbered items in the following numbered bids for
materials, Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted shown d approved Bas
being the lowest responsible bids for such items:
BEER ITEM NO • R &40UNT%
937_x_ All -Watson Electric Co. 117.AA1.29
99 37_ All Argg Coat action Co. S10.290.ffl
938_1` -39 t f ~s`~ of Dallas 524.950.00
9381 40-46 st ss tentisls 115,440.00
_
9386 _Plalns Nachlnarv $211207.00
9386 2~__ Coop*rftchinery 9,18.80
SZCT~ Ii.
That bar the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of tha submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the
persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to
purchase the owterials, equipment, supplies or services in
accordance with the termag specifications, standards quantities
and for the s ecifted auto contained in the Bid Invitation Bid
Proposals, and related documents.
7 77
SECTION III.
That should the City and parsons submitting approved and
accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a
formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval,
and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated
representative is hereby authorized to execute the written
contract which shall be attached hereto; provided that the
written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions,
specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums
contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein
approved and accepted.
SECTION IV.
That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered
items of the submitted bids the City Council hereby authorizes
the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in
accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written
contract .srde pursuant thereto as authorized herein.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 15 day of Jan rv 1985
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLM, CITY FrMM=
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM.,
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Or DWTON, TZXAB
BY%
r
DATE: 1-9-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
r
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID /9377 MOTOR CONTROLLER
RECOMt ENDATION: We reconn:end this bid be awarded to Watson Electric Co. of
Denton for the Allen Bradley Motor Controller for $15,771.22
plus estimated freight not to exceed $800.00 for the total
of $17,557.22.
SUbi_ 14AR Y: This bid is for the purchase of a replacement motor controller
at the Municipal Power Plant. We received four bids as per the
attached tabulation sheet.
BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Utility Production Repair & Maintenance
FISCAL IMPACT: Budget Account ri610-008-0251-8339
Respectfully submitted:
QA02A
G, CHM
City Manager
Pr red b
J . Marshal , C, .
le urchasing Agent
App d:
rsha 1, C, .M,
me rchdsing Agent
btD t_ 9377
IM TITLE MOTOR CONTROLLER
OPENED December 20, 1984 2 P.M. LAKELAND BUTLER 6 SHERMCO WATSON
ENGINEERING LAND
ACCOUNT 1_
ITM i VENDO VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 MOTOR CONTROLLER 19,083.00 19 325.00 7,510.00 17,557.22 t 11 657.22
pelivery 1 @ks 8-10 Wks 63 Days 126 Days
Fob Westministe Houston Houston Factory
Maryland TX TX
Fob Houston FOB Factor
PP & Allow PP 6 Allow 800 Frei ht Est.
Watson has sent an Allen Bradl Represents ive to the wer Plant t be sure a ut the
Proper control)er Ind es o f s. Watson s a local d ler. The ave re res t d r
Supplies an the City very res ns y.
v !.3 w.m 1,: ^ir Fi ~Cd.d C' Y I ' C.n 1. 'w ADATE: 1-9-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #9319 STEEL RETAINING WALL SECTIONS
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to Armco Construcstion Co.,
for the purchase of Bin-Type Retaining Wall SEctions, for
the bid amount of $10,290.00.
SUMMARY: Bids were sent to several steel companies. However, Armco is
---the only manufacturor/supplier in this area; and they were
bidding us direct. The otner steel companies, therefore, did
not bid as their cost would be the same as ours., We only
received one bid.
BACKGROUND: -This retaining wall is for the purpose of creating a belpw-
level unloading area for public disposal of solid waste at
the new landfill.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Receiving of solid waste at new landfill so that it can be
easily taken to the proper landfill area.
FISCAL IMPACT: . There is no impact on the General Fund.
Respectfull submi ted:
Ii. unris Hartung
City Manager
Pcd ed b
C~ ov
• N)fQr-4hj/0,'K&r9h&llj C. P.
fi,46 W chasing, Agent
A ed;
I Jo rshall, C.PA
dot rchasing Agent
BID f _ 9379
BID TITLE STEEL RETAINING WALL ARRM COT.
OPENED 1-3-85 2 p m CO.
ACCOUNT 1 631-002-0803-9101
ITE -q
T1 VFNDOR_ VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
1 25 Sections Bin-Type Retainin Wa11 101290.00
_ Del iverv 70 Days
1
• DATE:
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Cltiris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: BID #F9381 MODULAR FURNITURE FOR FINANCE DEPT.
RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the low bidder on each of the two categories.
Items 1 through 39, Modular Furniture, to Office Furniture
of Dallas for the total amount of 524050.00; and Items
40 through 48, Chairs, Tables, File Cabinets, Etc., to
Business Essentials of Denton for the total amount of
$15,440.00.
SUMMARY: This bid is part of Phase I. The modular.furniture with
the necessary chairs, files, etc. will complete this
phase section in the Finance Department at the Municipal
Building.
BACKGROUND: Bid Tabulation Sheet
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
FISCAL IMPACT. There is no impict on the General Fund
Respectfully submitted:
City Manager
,
Prd d by:
Mahall, C,P.M.
a JOU&iinglgent
is PAp re :
jffe rshall, C,P,M,
chasing AGent
btb 1 9381
BID TITLE MODULAR FURNITURE FOR
ACCOUNTING MILLER BUSINESS GOLDSMITHS DENTON FFICE
OPENED January 3. 1985 2 D,m. BUSINESS ESSENTIALS INC. OFFICE FURNITURE
SYSTEMS/ SUPPLY F DALLAS
ACCOUNT 1 430-004-0 oM-9114 BUSINESS
INTERIORS
TY
1101 DESCRIPTION VEN VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
MODULAR FURNITURE - Items 1-39 27,809.95 27,396.00 27,510.64 NB 4x950.00
Complete
CHAIRS, FILES 17 82.55 15,440.00 16 179.50 16 545.00
Items 40 - 48 -NIB
-Delivery 60 Days 60-75 a 63 Days 30-45 Days 8-10 Wks
Fob Denton Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
DATE: 1-9-85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SU3J ECT: 810 #9386 VIBRATORY ROLLERS
RECOMMENIIATION: We recomment this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder
meeting specification for each item.
Item 1 Tandem Roller Plains Machinery ;21,207.00
Item 2 Vibratory Roller Cooper Machinery $ 9,189.80
BACXGROUND: .__.The lower prices offered by Cooper Machinery on Item 1
do not meet the specified weight and width of the compaction
drum, engine size, gauge requirements and type of engine.,
The lower price offered by Ferguson Mfg. and Cooper Machinery
on item 2 do not meet the specifications in number of vibrating
rollers tons of compaction weight and size of engine/
PROGRAMS, DEPARTAENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
These rollers will be assigned to the Street Department
for use in the construction and maintenance of city
streets.
FISCAL IMPACT; _.These units are being financed thru a third paty lease/
purchase agreement. Payments will be made from the
1984-85 Fiscal Budget.
- Respectfully subei ted:
•
City Manager
P area
ame Tom D, Shaw, C,P.M.
Title Assistant Purchasing Agent
Approved,
Wait- J MershelI ie rchasing '
Agent
RID TITLE VIBRATORY 011 FR
OPENED FERGUSON COOPER COOPER HI-WAY PLAINS
Janu~4 yr _ 8. 1985 2 p.m. MFG. CO. MACHINERY CHINERY MACHINERY
ACCOUNT 1 100-002-0031-8508 INC. CORP. CORP. CO.
ITEM DES VENDOR VENDO VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR
] 1 Roller Spec 2850 24,800.00 14,988.00 19,768.40 NIB 21,207.00
2 1 Roller Spec 2872 80100.00 69570.00 90189480 99345.00 NIB
I
FOB Denton Denton Enton Denton Denton
Delivery /1 10 Days 45 Days 15 Days 20-45 Days
12 30-45 Days 45 DA s 5 DAys 1 Day
Make #I F r uson Mauldin ago 2-36 Rosco Bona
Make /2 Ferguson Mauldin [ago 1-36
,
NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCOR-
DANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES
FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, state law' requires that certain contracts requiring
an expenditure or payment by the City in as amount exceeding
$5,000 be by competitive bids, except in the case of public
calamity where it becomes necessary to act at once to appropriate
money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or to preserve
the property of the city, or it is necessary to protect the
public health of the citizens of the city, or in case of
unforeseen damage to public property, machinery or equipment; and
WMMMr Section 2.36 f of the
Cod! of
( ) Ordinances require,
that the City Council approve all wMenditurei of more than
=3,000; and
I
SAS, Section 2.09 of the City Charter requires that
ever act of the council providing for the expenditure of funds
or for the contracting of indebtedness shall be by ordinance;
NOW, THEMTORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY
ORDAINS:
SECT_ ION`
That the City Council hereby determines that there is a
public calamity that makes it cecassary to act at once to
appropriate money to relieve the necessity of the citizens, or
to preserve the property of the city, or to protect tha public
health of the citizens of the city, or to provide for unforeeen
damage to public property, machinery or equipmwu:, and by reason
thereof, the following emergency purchase of materials,
equipment, supplies or services, as described in the "Purchase
Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved,
r
PURCHASE
ORDER NUMBER VENDOR AMOUNT
66190 BOYD EXCAVATION $7,020.00
66666 SOM EXCAVATION $76020.00
SECTION It.
That because of such emergency, the Cit/ Manager or
designated employee is hereby authorised to purchase the
materials, equipeent, supplies or cervices as described in the
attached Purchase Orders and to sake payment tharefore in the
ascunts therein stated, such emergency purchases being in
• ac.ordance with the provisions of state law exempting such
purchases by the City from the requirements of competitive bids.
SECTION III.
That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1,. day of wjAj , 19,4,x.
RTC= 0. MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLUM "1#02 CITY SEMMM
CITY OP DUMN, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO MAL FORM:
JOE D. MORAI8, ACTING CI'T'Y ATTORNEY
CITY Or DENTON, TEXAS
sY:
PAGE 2
y
'5 . 5 ~rii y,rr ,r :'E:~f . ,...t, t 1111 ' C
DATE: 1/9/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDERS 66190 AND 66666 BOYD EXCAVATION
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend these purchase orders be approved in the
amount of $7,020.00 each for a total of $14,040.00.
BACKGROUND:
These purchase orders are for the emergency rental of two
self-loading scrapers being used at the Landfill in an attempt to prepare
for and expedite the opening of the Landfill. The prices were determined
to be fail and reasonable.after solicitating telephone quotations.
ROGRAMS, DEPART?IENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
The Solid Waste Department has been very diligently
attempting to prepare the Landfill for opening. However, due to
limited equipment and undesirable weather conditions, the rental of
outside equipment is necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for these purchase orders will come from the 1984-85
budget acccunt 631-002-0803-8502 Sanitary Landfill.
RespeUf~~ y s m'tted:
•
G. CKPIs Hartung
City Manager
a r e d y•
ame
Title 1825ififft Purchasing Agent
V
ite u ershall
Purchaasing Agent
'77 j
1't) t)lt
a a ww v cr
'r ,e '.4 . ~r v .s. .r, ,r rti ` rr r r rw'a„ e
a 5 i k r i V
.o RF,
E DENfTON. rt 78 1
P. 0. NUMM M DATENENDOR NO. DOCUMBIT
66666 01/08/85
VENDOPt SHIP TO. ,
BOYD EMAVATION SOLID WASTE
3500 PORT woo DRIVE
D>!21'1Ms TX 76201
ITEM AMOUNT NUMOR UNITS NIA' 45M DESORPTION IND NO. UNE AMOM
1. 631 002 0803 8502 108 hours scraper rental per hour 79020.00
I
I
The MY Of Denton, Tom Is tex exempt • House BIII No. 20. 7020.00
Aefarerrce P.O. Number on all 811., 8hlpnw, end bmoloes.
SN rrw to are F.O.B. City of Denton, or as Indlcatted.
Mad Nwd m TOe DMA M AM M111i m ! e TD:
Ctty of Denton, Aa6mft Pay" John J. Marshall, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent
215E ai Dw*M rA 7M Toro D. Shaw, C.P.M. Asst. Puroha6Mp Ap m
81716008311 0/FW Matra 2074M
-TM My of Denton Is an squat opportunity smploysr
1"Voks Ole
MILIN
` ~ w~~
ut. 061 6
Qf iON, fE,Y,hS 7G201
A17.•38:•5 ]•43
SOLO SHIPPED T i
IT , IT ! ~
ZIP- S ATE z1v-
lam/ iG~9C./ ~l-
COST [R•SORO R SALKS14AN TER P.O.@. T f
W 79,
p 3
JIF
z
E
r
7H 722
'J.,.-.~!~~~ v Y!'>f,~~fT3'. ~i~~a. .:c'h'i.. ~7txy r. {'"'.''y.'•
i
" eY5'.'T., 6
y rZ t "v w ~w "A., VI t Ile
DATS: 1/15/85
CITI COUNCIL REPORT 804MAT
T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager /
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR 10NING CASE Z-1692
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoting Commission recommended approval of Z-1692 by
a vote of 6-1. The City Council considered this item at its October
16, 1984 meeting and the concensus was approval.
SUMMARY:
A toning change i -i~ from the agricultural (A) district to the
commercial (C) classification on an 18.8 acre tract located on the
west side of Loop 288 approximately 2,500 feet south of East
McKinney St. (FM 626).
BACKGROUND:
The site is located in a high intensity are% designated by the
Denton Development guide as an area for employment emphasis.
Cosamercial zoning is consistent with Development Guide policies for
this area.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
RespectEull submltt
•
G. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Denise Spivey/
Development Review Planner
A ro
Jef f
Director of Planning
and Cossaunity Development
0951g,
t. 4, Is. .i e e~.Y~ ~ " *r' T~yc?v 1'~? 3•y~~:im a.a '1"h.°,~~i }n. r.;rv K•.
H..i; w r off
04) IL
NO. _
AN ORDINANCE MENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS S.iME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPEODIX TO THE CODE CF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. G9-1, AND AS SAID NAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 18.801 ACRES OF LA1M SITL'A:ED IN THE WARY
L. AUSTIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 4, DENTON COUNTY, 'TEXAS AND LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOOP 288 APMOXIiATELY 2,500 FEET dOVTH OF
EAST NCKI;INEY STREET (F.M. 426) TO PKOVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ; ONING
CLASSIFICAT'ON AND USE DESIGNATION FROtt AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASS IFICAI..ie' AND USE TO COMMERCIAL "C" CLASSIFICATION AND USE
FOR SAID PROPERTY; AND DECLARING All EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or pert of the ?roper-,y described below is hereby changed
from Agricultural "A' District Classification and Use to
Commercial "C" District Classification and Use under the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
Being two tracts of land in the Mary L. Austin Survey, Abstract
No. 4, Denton County, Texas and being a part of a 103.039 acre
tract of land conveyed to Carl Young from Good and Associates,
Inc. Trustee by deed dated 9-2-75 and recorded in Volume 756, Pabe
562 Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being more
particularly described as follows:
TRACT A: Beginning at a corner on the vest line of Stdce Loop No.
at the most easterly southeast corner of said 103.039 acre
tract;
THENCE south 89°21'15" west with the most northerly south line of
said 103.039 acre tract 360.51 feet to a corner;
THENCE north 0°07'55" west 727.97 feer, to a corner;
THENCE north 89°54'25" east J58.75 is-et to a corner on the west
line of State Loop No. 288;
THENCE south 01°05'35" vest with the vest line of State Loop No.
288 a distance of 249.75 feet to a corner;
THENCr south 0°07'55" east with the vest line of State Loop 288 a
distance of 474.84 feet to the point of beginning and containing
4.997 acres of land net.
TRACT B: Beginning at a corner south 89°.7'15" west 360.51 feet
.roam a most easterly southeast corner of said 103.039 acre tract
and the west line of State Loop No. 288;
THENCE south 89°27'15" west with the most northetly south line of
said 103.039 acre tract 933.73 feet to a corner;
THENCE north 0°07'55" west 735.35 feet to a corner;
ThENLE north 89°54'25" east 933.70 feet to a corner;
Z-1692/KARL F. YOUNG/PACE 1
..7 t
THENCE south 0°01'55" east 727.97 feet to the point of beginning
and containing 13.804 acres of land net.
SECTION It.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby changed
from Agricultural "A" Distract Classification and Use to Commercial
"C" District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
SECTION 111.
The Zonis.q Hap of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the lLth
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the
same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classifi-
cation and Use.
SLCTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds tnat such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conservin5 the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
n e most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION Y.
That this ordinance shall be in full force ane effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.
RICHARD 0. S1 A t, HAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
L L t l L , CITY SECITETM
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVEi AS TO LEGAL FORK:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:-
Z-1692/KARL F. YOUNG/PAGE 2
m.. s
CITY COUNCIL iipORF FOWUIT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRO!(: G. Chris Hartung, City Managers
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR ZONING CASE 2-1696
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1696 by
a vote of 4-0 at its meeting of October 10, 1984. The City Council
considered this item at its meeting of November 6, 1984 and the
concensus was approval.
SUMMARY.
This is a request for a zoning change from the agricultural (A)
district to tho planned development (PD) classification on a 128
acre tract located adjacent and east of Sherman Drive (FM 428) and
adjacent and north of Kings Row and the Cambridge Square Subdivision.
BACKGROUND:
The moderate center at Sherman Drive and Loop 288 was expanded to
approve the toning of this mixed use planned development. The
planned development permits the following land uses: single family
detached, duplex, multi-family, office, retail, and park site. The
expansion of the moderate node allows for this flexibility of land
use.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not appli:able
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respel1 bmWeit.
G. Chris Hartung
City Mentger
Prepared by:
Denise Spi ay'
Development Review Manner
A vmw:-s-
i4ff
Director of Planning
and Community Development
9953,;
~ ~ Y !,i( si SF A y L v „S V rv b'
,u p ~ qr.N w4 . ,x r
978E
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAF OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 129.245 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ADJACENT AND EAST OF F.M.
428 (SHERMAN DRIVE) AND ADJACENT AND NORTH OF KINGS ROV AND THE
CAMBRIDGE SQUARE SUBDIVISION, AND IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF; TO PROVIDE
FOR A CHANGE IN ZCNING CLASSIFICATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A"
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
"PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the toning classification and use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described as Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made apart hereof for all purposes is hereby changed
from Agricultural A District Classification and Use Designation
to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use
Designation under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
That in approving this planned development district ordinance,
the City Council hereby approves a preliminary site plan showing
the general proposed land uses within the district. Prior to the
issuance of any building permit for development within the district
or part thereof, a comprehensive site plan shall be required to be
submitted and approved as part of this ordinance in accordance with
Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances.
SECTION Ill.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the coR~cehensive site plan attached hereto and
Pade a part herein for all purposes.
SECTION IV.
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building within the planned development district, the
following conditions shall be met:
1. Development shall conform to approved zoning concept plan.
2. Specific site plan approval is required for all developments
except single family (SF-10) and duplex housing. Site plan
approval must be granted prior to the issuance of building
permits.
3. Density in multi-family Sections C. Es and F shall be limited
to 18 units per acre.
4. Gross retail acreage in Section D shall not exceed ten (10)
acres on final coning concept plan.
Z-1696/ROBERT HOLLOWAY CORPORATION/PACE 1
her f S'$l , key' f vrm lzA: 9.s._`' .i. M1.. .1 a r,c, > i a of - .Y?'
I
5. Section 8 shall be limited to land uses permitted in the City
of Denton office (0) zoning district only.
6. A minimum six (6) foot solid combination wood/masonry or
masonry fence shall be erected along all property lines where
residential land uses of any type sbut retail and/or office
land uses.
7. All Zity of Denton development standards, subdivision
regulations, land development codes, and building code
requirements shall be enforced unless expressly waived
in the approved planned development (PD) ordinance.
8. Final street alignment shall be determined by the City
Transportation Engineer.
SECTION V.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration] among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION VI.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWART, MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CW-ALRLOTTE ALLEN CITY SECRMM
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CI7Y OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY:
Z-1696/ROBERT HOLLOWAY CORPORATION/PAGE 2
r . 4., r, i; s :n "J
47 r . r . n, 9 y , ar'u. 1 J'.'~I . F . n .r
UNIIII "A"
All those nsrtsls tracts or parcels of lend sissetad is the
County of 0eates, state of Taxes, bolas described it two
tracts as fellows, to-Vitt
FIRST TRACTt
A31 that cartels times or Parcel of land sltwtal Is the
sows) Mctrackes Surrey, A•117, Cis sad county of Dwell
rears befog a art o! B (1141191) 113.663 acre srar,t described
its a iota from loopy Turner, Trustee, to Cootsl11 Wands Akers
waste? and "still Martin Wilson as February 3, 1074, recorded
In Velma 113, Palo 1130 Deed Records of Deates Cotaty,
Tests sad bats/ sort fully described as fellers:
WINNING at the West southwest earner at sold ;13.161
acts tract at the Intersection of the middle of a br•.+ch
with the lostarl rf lot of Way of P.M. Ml bray 410;
Tuna N. 3i' U' do" East With the CS011r Tisbt of
Wei of P.M. NAIWVI' 131 Oest and sear a fence a distance of
161.11 feet to • $test pin as the Ssutbetll1rr right of way .31
it tract for Disposed Loop 116 •s described Sa a teed free
Geersls Ronda Akers Massey, at 43, to the Samo4a of Testis and
recorded is Velma tali, palm 361, Dt0 Recmrl11 of Deeten
Comas r ;
Tlgsta Sautbastetl with the South btmltry line it
sale proposed 111 the follovis 1 bests 1s Asi :;ltlnees:
(1) N, 1411 00 1. 10.71 coati + "
' ' (~I s. f6 it 33 i.
136,11 last; (3) 660 it, If" . 1111.16 feet' S. 626
a6+ S1" 1. 110,11 feel; (6) 163' 16' 01" 1. ~0141 .I loot-
t6) s. S60 16' 17" 1, d0/.o f;4 s; es1 (1) E. 61' li+ 31"
1 .07 lest to • steel Plo on the loot ►auadery lilts It said
113363 sere tract amt of said Metrotbas solve
rr
TM/MGE 3. so 37+ 19" West a distance of 1t13.f1 feet to
6 stool pia at the southeast carrier of said tract and of
said PeCraekes Eurvelr~ most a turn in RINI$ Raw;
THENCE N. I7' Oil 34" West With the South buadery 11ne
of the McCraclea sutrarr in Rings Aew a distance of 166.16
feet to the South SoutAWeit eersor of the 513.663 Bete tract
to the middle of a breach;
THENCE N. 1' 16' I6' lost 100.17 feet is the ►eliaBing
of a Curve,
THENCE Nortkwest Wily around a curve to the left having
a cestrsl Basle of 11' 031, • chord of W. 11' {6' 04" best
13.10 feet, a radius et 60.0 lost and sit are lealth of 11.31
foot to the sal of said t4rve;
1WENCE N. 11' 47+ 34" West 166.0 feet to a corner in
the middle of said breach;
THENCE Northwesterly arband a curve to the if ht having
a central Bogle of ice 16', a chard of k. It' 301 !t•, best
11.77 toot, a Isaias e! 101.11 cell, slid oil are length of
12.16 feet to the ass of said curve;
THENCE N. 330 31' 34" rest 136.61 feet to a corner in
said branch;
THENCE N. I0' 31+ 34" West 111.11 toot to a corner in
said branch;
TWCI N. 33. 31' 34" West 615.17 feat to a corner in
said brsachl
THINCI N. I1• 46' 34" West 11.0 lost to the Plate of
lestssial sad cestelmial is 1111 103.761 acres of lard.
Z-1696/ROBERT HOLLOWAY/PAGE 3
~ 1~ r 6 x 1 ~ ~'9 kip rh ~i ' E" f~ 4 V ` ,i,l ( 7'T^77.
aaMlali;'A• •••aostsew teas
IJCOMD TAACTt
All that certain tract oT parcel of lead gStwatad is the
$aawel McCtotleA survey A•117, Denton Countyr, Teals, being
f!art of a (called) 111.113 ACTS 118et deecr3111 in a deed
lreo Tosry Terser, Trwstae, to Georltg Masao Mere Noiley
sad !Olin Martim wheal OR pabrwary 3, 1171 reterded in
Vale" 571, page 103, Dead Records o! Bald fouaty gad ►sisi
more fully described as follewt
COMOCINC at the Northwest career of laid SS1.113 acre
traet at the Istoropetlen of the instantr rt bt of way of
P.M. Mlttbusy 411 with the middle of Marilee Meld Read;
TN m 1. too 31' 40" vast witb the latterly right of
ray of R.M. Mlgbway 131 a distance *1, 63141 feat to a steel
pia at the place of b sissiall ' .
TOM S. -110 -Olt 13" last a distaste of 113.11 lest to
a stool rr1• aa-the last bowadary list of the 113.111 acts
tract an+ the 9tft bormdary lice of the Mccraclsa surrey;
TM/NCI 1.'3 311 490 Yeat with the last ►euaeary We
of said tract aad of said surrey a distaste of 1311.11 loot
line of a tract for
to a steel pis as the Nertb beunda"a
Iuerepesed LoeP 111 as described is t sed from Georgia rands
llers Massey, at aI to the $oto of Texas gad recorded All
Volume 1015, pasg'312, Dead Records of Dentem County;
T111MC1 kertbwesterly with the North boundary line of
11 1topasod WePP lei the followins l basrlals end distence5:
f1) V. 300'11' 370 V. 351.07 (est= (1) M. $60 10' Is" W.
10.4 laetl ((3) ".4410'10' 41" V 111.11 feet; (4) M. 564
41, 31" V. 1i 7.00 test; aad (1) 310 40' 17" V. 74.11 feet
to a stool pia sa the Most "ostarly ►oundaty line of the
161.113 acre tract and am the lastariy right of way of F.M.
"ishvey 411; " 4 ' ,
Tg9MC1 N. 310 3/' 40^ 9851 with sold right of way along
tad Sear a (tact a distance of =33.51 fsot to the Plata of
9egiaaiml and costaiatag is 811 11.417 acres of land.
Z-1696/ROBE'iT HOLLOWAY
'I ` t ',"y r
/ tfy
G R V YA. Ar
•+o-o4~° orncr
j t rAS.
\ AGRICULTURE !
16 A0C ir° C NSF7
GR I6 uAs V hr
1AA P •
70 k
4.
• ~YAL L
Ra
0 A& M! I 9 O As. r~
KuA.. g~' h
- urUK Mrtt
. ~.e ..frwr r w .~n 14M
p t Y I - i AA1
16. JC! -777 I I 7,7 ..w
f q•t• h frt Mr+►/1 Y ,009M!
C J r
- - - ~ ••..o -ortt r +•s• ar r wa
sc.vf 5 1
SF-? p 5 rills rArb NOW$
i/!k AL.
~r
bP ~
_ WtL
.r .Ir.li! ♦s I it tts
A t
A.
• 'Mote •t •let
fs 4 rr 1f ref 1!M
.
r
r,,,•-..' t • qtf
•0 t iOt .0~0
S A r 1 064% .116
1 •e••,' rl r. .0241
sec t . fu.r 2(%'*,, at r!
5 F' 10 ••11wd +nr~n ..t tels•s I&M rpt+it
CQbViw!u -MiREV
~ I
rCAlr 1•r jQQ f
7 , v•[C
4 Sir. 10
Z.
~E 9G
Z-1646/ROBERT HOLLOWAY/PAGE 4Z' 09, .vee ants M, ;,~,uH ';ilR+ A 64
• r..
':C a f r»'. Y.5 i 9Nr `r r 7 J f ~a ~'A~ r rf.ttr.
1f r'~ fr`~''a7S71i_ C_C ~rS`i E~Ij
DATRs 1/15/85
CITY YCC09 CIL REPORT FORMA,M
T0: Malor and Members of the City Council
40900,
FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR ZONING CASH Z-1699
RECOMKENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of Z-1699 by
a vote of 4-0 at its meeting of October 10, 1984. The City Council
considered this item at its meeting of November 6, 1984 and the
concensus was approval.
S Rte
A zoning change from the agricultural (A) district to the commercial
(C) classification was approved on a 1.9 acre tract located on the
west side of Bonnie Brae Street, approximately 1,000 feet soVth of
willowwood Street.
BACKGROM:
A manufacturing facility located at the site designated as a legal
nonconforming use, burned In the summer of 1984. The granting of
light industrial (LI) zoning will allow the reconstruction of the
manufacturing pltnt.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no Impact on the general fund.
Respectfully submitt :
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepare
14", A4 d by::ac~
Denise Spivdy e
Development Review Planner
Via f stn~t=-
Diroctot of Planning
and Community Development
0951g
!n w7 rt. row . w l B w 7 .e c c°i 1
4TV
~ ~.p'✓<!^~~ j~;9 9+ '''1 2 ! . { A s 's i A~Ef , '~~A)l are..
c j
a 1.
NO•
AN ORUINANCE AMENDING THE Z0I4ING MAP OF THE CITY OF CENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF JKDI:A:\CES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID XAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 1.963 ACkES OF LAND SITUATED IN THE 0. b.
BREWSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 56, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF BONNIE BRAE STREET APPROXIMATELY 1,uOU FEET
SOUTH OF WIILOWWOOD STREET TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANCE IN ZONING
CLASSIFICATIO14 AND USE DESIGNATION FROM AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL "Lt" DISTRICT CLASSIFI-
CATION AND USE DESIGNATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUi4CIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby chanced
from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Light
Industrial "LP District Classification and Use under the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in the 0. 8.
Brewster Survey, Abstract No. 56, Denton County, Texas being a part
of a tract of land conveyed to C. E. Jones, et ux to J. F. Noel, on
November 12, 1942, recorded !n Volume 298, Page 551, Deed ke:ords
of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as
follows:
3EGIiaNING on the east line of the above mentioned Jones tract a
distance of 503.5 feet north of its southeast corner of the west
line of a public road;
THENCE west a distance of 325 feet to an iron pin for corner;
THENCE north a distance of 275 feet to an iron pit for corner;
THENCE east a distance of 247.6 feet to an iron pi•i for c001.er;
THENCE south 37°44'20" east a distance of 126.45 feat to in irer
pin fur corner on the west line of the above mentioned public real;
THENCE south along the west line of said public road and 0a east
line of the above mentioned Jones tract a distance of 115 feet to
the place of beginning, containing in all 1.963 acres of land.
SECTION It.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby chanted
from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use to Light
Industrial "Lt" District Classification and Use under the
comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
SECTION 111.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69.1, be, and the
sane is hereby sdended to show such chance in District Classifica-
tion and Use.
Z-1699/M 6 B IIETAL PRODUCTS, INC./PAC! 1
J
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that =uch change is in accordance with a coiaprehensive plan
fur the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for tBe character of the district ant. for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a vier to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to tre
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
Thaz this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and -ppt wal, the require? public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Toning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
KICHARD . J ,
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CRXRLUTTE , --b'VCFt=
CITY GF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORS:
JOB 0. IIURRIS, ACTING CITY AYTOItNLY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: 1
Z-1699/H L 8 METAL PRODUCTS, INC./FACE 2
~ DAT6: Oi/li/bS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR ZONING CASE Z-1703
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of Z-1703 by
a vote of 5-0 at its meeting of October 24, 1984. The City Council
considered this item at its meeting of November 24, 1984 and the
concensus was approval.
SUMMARY4
A zoning change from the agricultural (A) district to the planned
development (PD) classification was approved on a 243.3 acre tract
located on the north side of I-358 approximately 1800 feet east of
Loop 288.
BACKGROUND:
The site is located in a high intensity area and is compatible with
Denton Development Guide policies for the area. The planned
development will ensure more efficient planning for the major roads,
drainage and utility systems for this area.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fmpact on the general fund.
Respectfully submitted:
a
G. CRc
City Manager
Prepared by:
3
C n~ i
Denise Spl~ey
Development Review Planner
V r 24U4L.",
J e f f
Director of Planning
and community Development
09538
C7 1~
980E '
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1 AND AS SAID HAP
APPLIES TO 243.361 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
INTERSTATE 35E APPROXIMATELY 19800 FEET WT OF LOOP 288, AND IS
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND
MADE A PART HEREOF; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICA-
TION FROM AGRICULTI.ItAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
AND USE DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the zoning classification and use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described as Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes is hereby changed
from Agricultural 'A" District Classification and Use Designation
to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use
Designation under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas.
SECTION II.
That in approving this planned development district ordinance,
the City Council hereby approves a preliminary site plan showing
the general proposed lend uses within the district. Prior to the
issuance of any building permit for development within the district
or part thereof, a comprehensive site plan shall be required to be
submitted and approved as part of this ordinance in accordance with
Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning, of the Code of ordinances.
SECTION III.
That the development of the property ohail be in substantial
compliance with the comprehensive site plan attached hereto and
made a part herein for all purposes.
SECTION IV.
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building within the planned development district, the
following conditions shall be met:
1. The following land uses shall not be permitted in the approved
PD:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Botching Ptlsnt (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boardinga or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fi11 Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Celiche, Stone, Clay or Gravel
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or Storage Company
Z-1703/HENRY S. MILLER CO./PAGE 1
r b .'S'. v .ri },'I: r i :'f w rc,, a 9'4 z
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Hiving or Storage of Mining Castes
Open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery, etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand, Gravel or Earth Sales or Storage
Stable, Commercial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances Outside a building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Home Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
SECTION V.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of proaoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION VI.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the required public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEWARTo MAYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE ALLEW,-CITY SECRET
CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. HORRIS, ACTINO CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS
BY: '
Z-1703/HENRY S. MILLER CO./PACE 2
EXHIBIT .,An
ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRACT 1
243.361 ACRE FROM •A" AGRICULTURAL TO
"PO - MF 2" PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MULTI-FAMILYs
"PD - 0' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, AND
'PD - LI' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Being 243.361 acres of land situated in the M.E.P. i P.R.R. CO.
SURVEY, Abstract Number 9501 DANIEL LAMBERT SURVEY. Abstract
Number 7841 J. WHITE SURVEYP Abstract Number 1433s and the J. S.
TAFT SURVEY, Abstract Number 12560 Denton County, Texas, being
more particularly described by metes and bounds as, follows:
BEGINNING in the West right-of-way of the Missouri, Kansas and
Texas Railroad on the Forth line of said M.E.P. t P.A.R.
Survey at a point N 88' 26' 47" W, 178.69 feet from a
1/2' steel pin found by description being the Northeast
corner of said survey, said beginning corner being on the
approximate Northwest line of the Mayhill Roads and being
the Northeast corner of the 39.46 acre tract conveyed to
Henry S. Miller Company, Trustee, by J. V. Woodford and
wife, Norma I. Woodford, in deed dated July 140 1969, and
recorded in Volume 589, Page 73, of the Deed Records of
Denton County, Texass
THENCE in a Southwesterly direction with a fence and the
Northwest line of Mayhill Road for the following six calls:
1. S 58" 22' 19" W, 186.36 feet to a fence posts
2. S 37" 29' 59' W, 184.33 feet to a fence posts
3. S 330 13' 29" WP 140,85 feet to a fence posts
4. S 26' 05' 26' W, 233.14 feet to a fence posts
5. S 15" 01' 49" W, 124.49 feet to a fence posts
6. S 140 41' 20' W, 993.93 feet to a right-of-way past for
the Northeast right-of-way of Interstate Highway 3S-Es
THENCE in a Northvesterly direction with the right-of-way of
Interstate Highway 35E for the following ten calls:
1. S 890 31' 57" W, 72.21 fedit to a right-of-way posts
2. N 49" 54' 02" W, with a fence on the said right-of-way
803.28 feet to a right-of-way posts
3. N $30 32' 00" W, 94.00 feet to a lit" steel pin;
4. N 49" 15' 55' W, with a fence on said right-of-way
511.58 feet to a fence corner for the most Westerly
corner of the said Woodford 39.46 acre tract; also being
in the South line of the 12.252 acre tract conveyed to
Henry S, Miller Company, Trustee, by Thule Mae Carruth
and Leslie Gordon Carruth in deed dated December S,
1969, and recorded in Volume 595, Page 343, Deed Records
of Denton County, Texas;
5. S 61" 58' 00' W, 44.66 feet with said South line of
said Carruth 12.252 acre tract to a 1/2' inch steel pin
and fence corner posts
6. N 49" 57' 00" W, passing as 122A,60 feet to a 1/2' steel
pin and fence corner for the northwest corner of said
Carruth 12.252 acre tract and being in the North bound-
ari, line of said M.E.P 6 1'.R.R. Co. Survey, Abstract
♦ No. 9501 said corner also being the Southwest corner of
the Sullivan 66,847 acre tract in tsie Daniel Lambert
Survey, Abstract No. 784, conveyed to Henry S. Miller
Company, Trustee, by Mrs. W. C. (Louis :eorge) Sullivan,
et al, in deed dated July 8, 1969, re:orded in Volume
588, Page 208, Deed Records of Denton County, Texas;
continuing in all 1372.32 feet to a 1/2" steel pins
NiA 383-015
Septenber 21, 1984
Z-1103/HENRY S. MILLER/PACE 3
7-7- 77 r h.(! .e Cif n 4 j'~f a•.
M r reiC 77 7
"ter. , , l • ~ .
7. N S16 04' 00 W, passing at 592,60 foot a steel fence
corner for the Northwest cornor of said Sullivan 66.847
acre tract and the Southwest corner of the 4,570 tract
conveyed to Henry S, Miller. Trustee, by Carl N, Haggard
and wife, Oleva LaNeu Haggard, in deed dated July 10,
1969, recorded in Volume 588, Page 303, Deed Records of
Denton County, Texass passing at 1462.00 feet a fence
corner for the northwest corner of said Haggard 4.570
acre tract and she southwest corner of a 49.230 acre
tract conveyed to Henry S. Miller Company, Trustee, by
Fred Woodell, in deed dated July 16, 1969, and recorded
in Volume 569, Page 415, Deed Records of Denton County,
Texasl continuing in all 2220.10 feet to a right-of-way
marker and the point of curvature of a Curve to the
Right whose radius is 11009.20 feeti said point being
150 fe<t from and at right angles to the centerline of
IN 3SEt
B. N 50' 50' 44" W, a chord distance of 87.29 feet to a
1/2' steel pin for the Foint of Tangency of said curve;
9. N 459 17' 00' W, 99.20 feet to a 1/2' steel pin for the
Point of Curvature of a Curve to the Right whose radius
is 11,299.20 feats said point being 160 feet from and at
right angles to the centerline of IN 35E6
10. N 494 19' 31' W, a chord distance of 90.00 feet to a
1/2" steel pin for the Northeast corner of a 0.196 acre
tract conveyed to the State of Texas by J, H. Thomas,
et ux, in Cause No. 5152 recorded in Volume 446, Page
383, De-d Records of Denton County, Texasr
THENCE N 29' 30' 00' W, 179.28 feet with the East line of the
J. H. Thomas remainder to a 1/2" steel pin for the North
corner of said Thomas ramaindert same being the Southwest
corner of a 57.62 a-,re tract conveyed as Part One to Henry
S. Miller Company, trustee, by Hubert A. Hefner and wife
Dorothy A. Hefner, in deed dated July 9, 1969, and recorded
in Volume 598, Page 36, Deed Records of Denton County,
Texasr said corner also being in the East line of a 2.594
acre tract conveyed to Denton-Post Oak Joint Venture by Jack
Arrington et ux, in deed dated June 14, 1983, and recorded
in Volume 1225, Page 995, Deed Records of Denton County,
Texasl
THENCE S 020 17' 57' W, 77.2S feet with the East line of said
Arrington 2.594 acre tract and the West line of said Thomas
remainder to a 1/2" iron rod in the East line of the Daniel
Lambert Survey, Abstract No. 784, and in the Northeast
right-of-vay line of IN 35Et being 160 feet from and at
right angles from the centerline of IN 3SEr
THENCE Northwesterly with said Northeast right-of-way of IN 35E
the following four callsi
1. Northwesterly with a Curve to the Right having a radius
of 11,299,20 feet, a chord bearing N 48' 38' 31' W, a
distance of 74.21 feet to a 1/2" steel pin for the Point
of Tangency of said curer
2. N 53" 0' 40" W, 99,20 feet to a 1/2' steel pin for the
Point of Curvature of a Curve to the Right whose radius
is 11,309,20 feetr being 150 feet from and at right
angles from the centerline of IN 3SE1
3. N 48" 02' 53' W, a chord distance of 139.59 feet to a
1/2' steel pin for tl,o Point of Tangency of said curver
Page 2 of 3
W&A l83-015
Septembor 21P 1984
Z-1703/HENRY S. BILLER
17777
4. N 470 41' 40' 1f, 11f-,70 test to a 1/2' stool pin near a
fence corner for the West corner of said Arrington 2,594
acre tracts
I
THENCE N 490 18' 36• to 481.35 feet along and near a fence to a
1/2' steel pin for the North corner of said Arrington 2.594
acre tracts being in the West line of said Hefner 67,62 acre
tract and the East line of the said Lambert Survey, Abstract
No, 784, and the Wrjst line of the is White Survey, Abstract
No. 1433;
THENCE N 02' 17' S5' E, 1318.35 feet to a fence corner for the
Northwest corner of the J. White Survey, Abstract No. 1433,
and the Northwest corner of said Hefner 67,62 acre tracts
THENCE 89' 43' 29' E, 585,63 feet along the North line of
said White Survey and said Hefner 67.62 acre tract to a 1/20
steel pin in the middle of an abandoned road for the
Southwest corner of a 1.532 acre tract in the J. S. Taft
Survey, Abstract No. 1256, conveyed to Henry S. Miller
Company, Trustee, by Roy Leon Bothwell at al, as Second
Tract in deed dated July 14, 1969, and recorded in Volume
589, Page 47, Deed Records of Denton County, Texast
THENCE N 010 02' 570 we 398.78 feet with the West line of said
Bothwell 1.532 apre tract in the middle of said abondoned
road to a 1/26 steel pin on the Westerly right-of-way of the
Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railroads
THENCE Southeasterly with the Southwest right-of-way of said
M,K.T. Railroad the following calls
1. S 414 24' 15' Co 2153.68 feet to a Point of Curvature of
a Curve to the Left whose radius is 1960.17 feet and a
central angle is 21' 10' 390;
2. Southeasterly with said Curve an Arc distance, of 724.52
feet to an iron pin near a fence corner for the N.^rth-
east corner of said Woodall 49.23 acre tract conveyed to
Henry S. Miller Company, Trustee, by Fred Woodall in
dried dated July 16, 19690 and recorded in Volume 58y,
Page 415, Dead Records of Denton County, Texas;
THENCE S 01' 31' 10' W, 962.59 feet with the East line of said
Woodall 29.23 acre tract and along and near a fence to an
iron pin rear a fence post for the Southeast corner of said
Woodell 49.23 acre tracts being in the North Ifni) of said
Sullivan 66.847 acre tract situated in the Daniel Lambert
Survey, Abstract No. 784 convoyed to Henry S. Miller
Company, Trustee, by Mrs. W. C. Uoufe Ceorge) Sullivan at
al, in dead dated July 8, 1969, and recorded in Volume $88,
Page 2080 Deed Records of Denton County, Texast
THENCE N 880 4:' 35' 1757.59 feet with said North line of
said Sullivan 66.847 acre tract and said Lambert Survey and
along and near a fence to an iron rail near a fence corner,
for the Northeast corner of said Sullivan (6.847 acre tracts
THENCE S 00' 52' 3S` W, 1098.97 feet with a fence to a 1/2'
steel pin for corner near a fence corner at the Southeast
corner of said Sullivan 66.847 acre tract and being In the
North line of said Woodford 39,460 acre tract conveyed to
Henry S. Miller Company, Trustee, by J. V. Woodford and
wife, Norma 1. Wooodford, in Deed dated July 14, 1969,
recorded in volume 589, page 73, Deed Records of Denton
County, Texast said line also being the South line of the
Daniel Lambert Survey, Abstract No. 784, and the North line
of the M,E.P 6 P.R.R. Co, Survey, Abstract No. 9501
THENCE S 88' 26' 470 E. 639.11 feet &Iono and near a fence with
the North Ifni of said Woodford 39.460 acre tract to the
PLACC OF BEGINNING and containing 243061 acr,ss of land.
Page 3 of 3
W4A 183-015
September 21, 1904
LEGEND
'
C~ 'PD A/F-?'r~141`,~norwrr 561 AC.
U 'PO-C' tI~ehvrlaww 95.E AC
'PO-U' tKrlOaar~alil~iarVUaresr IIIA AC. 0.4 Ms ac 0"
IOIAL 000.5 AC
ie • /"'r
Y
VIC"IY AMP
N
his
O
W
V '
7p a!
MAU I
r0r
PC I !L1 AC
>e r at t
fn C rro at I1 _
it: .7 of, . ~ ,T fr+a[ .7~'y_It-1 ~ afar S•.
bu ~ '
. 1_. U ' , gra4
ro 1
4 I 0 1 TIIACr 1 fl "..1 f
v rae V II14 AC
Id PO
c, a , . .
+at M"MJVE
~~.u..~l.:t-wn i
'f if16 Fj J ~I I I!•M1 ■
. p,..w.•Mr I IIa
ZON I NC EX H I B for
11f,V11.IMrI N:
300,5 ACRE-UENTON, TEXAS 401 BR AN„r,lt,;..Ita(la :a LJMMT rip
IA1FIAti, IIAAt 1R~ ~ w
Z_ did 3
",~..c
e
oe*~i '~til~ies
CITY COUIICIL WORT FO M&T
T0: Mayor and Members of the city council
FROM: 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT; ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR ZONING CASE Z-1704
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of %-1704 by
a vote of 5-0 at its meeting of October 24, 1984. The City Council
considered this item at its meeting of November 24, 1984 and the
concensus was approval.
S RY:
A zoning change from the agricultural (A) dietcict to the planned
development (PD) classification was approved on a 57 acre tract
located on the east side of Loop 288 approximately 2200 feet north
of t-352.
BACKGROUND:
The site is located in a high intensity area and is compatible with
Denton Development Guide policies for the area. The planned
development will ensure more efficient planning for the major roads,
drainage and utility systems for this area.
PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respectfully subml ed.
•
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
fuik
Denise spi ay
Development Review Planner
prV F
Direetor of Planning
and Community Davolopaent
0953&
L
[ A Y i tl z i %n.. Y ra f 1 r~:1 ; ,ifi a p, y^. i
979
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY ORDINANCE NO. 69.1 AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO 57.087 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LOOP
288, APPROXIMATELY 2,200 FEET NORTH OF INTERSTATE 35E, AND IS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A
PART HEREOF; TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM
AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE
DESIGNATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the toning classification and use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described as Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes is hereby ching.i
from Agricultural "A" District Classification and Use Designation
to Planned Development "PD" District Classification and Use
Designation under the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City
of Denton, Texas.
SECTION It.
That in approving this planned development district ordinance,
the City Council hereby approves a preliminary site plan showing
the general proposed land uses within the district. Prior to the
issuance of any building permit for development within the district
or part thereof, a comprehensive site plan shall be required to be
submitted and approved as part of this ordinance in accordance with
Article 11, Appendix B-Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances.
SECTION III.
That the development of the property shall be in substantial
compliance with the comprehensive site plan attached hereto and
made a part herein for all purposes.
SECTION IV.
That prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
use of any building within the planned development district, the
following conditions shall be met:
1. The following land uses shall not be permitted in the approved
PD:
Amusement, Commercial (outdoor), Drag Strip or Commercial Racing
Asphalt or Concrete Bitching Plant (permanent)
Brick Kiln or Tile Plant
Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House
Dump or Sanitary Fill Area
Cemetery or Mausoleum
Extraction and Sale of Sand, Calitlis, Stone, Clay or Grav•1
Fairgrounds or Exhibit Area
Go-Cart Track
Halfway House
Hatchery, Poultry
Hauling or storage Company
Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage
Z-1704/RALPH COLLINS/PAGE 1
4 ~$k ~1 .r ry~n f ,e'X _'p i m . • .Pas 3; r3 'A is .ib d i. I r !q
, ti, a`'= s A'.^ •~f4s !'v .i r F= s'.' r ^stt~••
Y4 i •'V 1.'~+
Hoes for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic or Psychiatric Patients
Livestock Auction
Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens or Yards
Mining or Storage of Mining Wastes
Open Salvage Yard for Raga or Machinery etc
Petroleum Collecting or Storage FacilitLes
Private Utility Shop or Storage Yard
Rodeo Grounds
Sand Gravel or Earth Sales or Storago
Stable, Comme•cial Rental
Stable, Boarding
Stable, Private Club
Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances Outside a Building
Theater, Drive-In
Tire Re-Treading or Capping
Tool Rental
Trailer Camp or Mobile Hose Park
Trailer Rental or Sales
Used Auto Parts Sales
2. Thera will be a six (G) foot solid fence between the Henry S.
Miller property and the r4ilroad track and between the Henry S.
Miller property and the Mason Haggard property.
SECTION V.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of procsoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with ressonab a consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging
the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the
City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V1.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately after its passage and approval, the requited public
hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
after giving due notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1985.
RICHARD 0. STEMM-l-EXTU
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
AYTEST:
CMMT-KE ALL CITY 5URETUY
CITY OF DENTONj TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNLY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
2.1704/RALPH COLUM/PAGE 2
5 Aly •r. 'il i a s_r: ro'_ eh a Y; x r` ii','1 t~a+,. t a~2n 1FF$ 't i x'4i. x ~t
IONINO DESCRIPTION
TRACT 2
$7.047 ACRES FROM "A" AGRICULTURAL TO
"PD - Mr 2" PLANNED DlVELOPt4ENT
MULTI-FAMILY AND "PD - LI` PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Sting $7.087 acres of land lying in the J. WHITE SURVEY, Abstract
No. 1433, and the J. S. TAFT SURVEY, Abstract No. 12560 Denton
County, Texas, and being Southeasterly of State Highway 298 and
Northeasterly of the Missouri. Kansas and Texas Railroads being
Part Two of 29.39 acres situated in the J. WHITE SURVEY, Abstract
No. 1433, described in deed dated July 9, 1969, from Hubert A.
Hefner and wife Dorothy A. Heffner to Henry S. Miller Company,
Trustee, recorded in Volume 588, Page 360 of the Deed Records of
Denton County, Texas, and also being the First Tract of 26.632
acres situated in the J. S. TAFT SURVEY, Abstract No. 12561 de-
scribed In deed dated July le, 19690 from Roy Leon Bothwell,
at al, to Henry S. Miller Company, Trustee, recorded in
Volume 589, Page 470 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas,
being mire particularly described as followso
BEGINNING at a fence corner by description being the Northeast
corner of the J. WHITE SURVEY, Abstract No. 1433 and the
Northeast corner of the H. A. Hefner 154 acre tract conveyed
to H. A. Hefner by deed dated December 26, 1917, from C. r.
Batts and E. C. Batts and recorded in Volume 1S5, Page 393,
of the Dead Records of Denton County, Texass said point also
being the Northeast corner of said Hefner 29,39 acre tract,
THENCE S 02' 22' 30" to along tho east boundary line of said
H. A. Hefner 154 acre tract and the said Hefner 29.39 acre
tract Ifence along this line is very irregular) a distinct
of 1564.39 feet to a 1/2" steel pin for the Southeast corner
of this tracts same being in the Northeasterly boundary line
of the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railroad right-of-ways
same being the Northeasterly right-of-way line as set forth
in a certain instrumtnt designated as "Relinquishment of
Right-of-Way" from Henry Owsley to the Dallas and Wichita
Railroad Company dated July 21, 1880, and recorded in
Volume OF Page 67, of the Deed Records of Denton County,
Texas]
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY with the said Northeasterly right-of-way the
following two calls
1. Northwesterly along a Curve to the Right whose radius is
1860.17 feet, central angle 19" 43' 44" being SO feet
from and parallel with the centerline of said railroad,
an are distance of 640,52 feet to a point of tangency of
said curves
2. N 41" 24' 15" W, 2271,38 feet along the Southwest line of
the said Heiner 29.39 acre tract and the said Bothwell
26.632 acre tract to a 1/i" steel pin for corner in the
West line of said 26,632 acre tracts
THENCE N 01' 02' 51" W, with said West line 177.00 feet to the
Southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 2981
THENCE with the Southerly right-of-way line of State Highway 289
the following two callse
1, N SS" 294 40" to 753.07 feet to right-of-way posts
2, N 600 06' 25" to 344.05 feet to a steel post and fenee
corner for the most NortheAy Northeast corner of said
Bothwell 26,632 acre tracts
W&A 483-01S
September 21, 1984
241704/RALPH COLLIRS/6XHIBI,i "A"/PACE 3
.jq •~y ~m 1 9 4tiA gC ~J'~~ .[k ~ f. !r 9r. r 1 ay '4 1~ 5, ~h S~ ~ r i ~ fJ: C1~
a.
' wl pj~
THENCE S 000 18' 03" to 307,27 feet to a 1/2" steel pin and
fence cornerl
THENCE N 896 49' 45" E, 328.45 feet to a (once corner tot the
most Southerly Northeast corner of said Bothwell 26.632 acre
tract.
THENCE S 00' 35' 32" to with 'a (onto 1019,12 feet to a fence
corner for the Southeast corner of said Bothwell 26.632 acre
tracts said corner being in the North line of said Hefner
29.39 acre tracts
THENCE N 69" 13' 42" E, with said North li.;e of said Hefner 29.39
act* tract passing a 1-inch iron pipe at 200.00 feet by
description being the Southeast corner of a certain 86.8
acre tract deedod by Mrs, Nora Mhyburn to M. M. Smith on
February 12, 1944, and recorded in Volume 305, Page 285,
Deed Records of Denton County, Ttxass continuing in all a
distance o' 606.07 feet to the PLACE of BEGINNING and
containing $7,087 aorta of land.
Page 2 of 2
NiA 183.015
September 21, 1984
2.1104/RALPH COLLINSIEXHIBIT "A"
LEGEND
C~ 'PD-Mf-2' Ltii'~i"SqaYuowtNt 68,1 AC.
p : 0-0' D;:ff 0 KMOOKN, 51.1 AC.
p 'PD-C' t " e°e°iwIIOhK I1 951 AC.
Cp 'PD-LP Pricwfnu "Lo"""t 91,8 AC. was.e rn
TOTAL 900 5 ACy
.jj VICNTY MAP
b
x
i ~
n m '
O h9f . /.__2TRACT 2
ro u V ~`l $J`J AC
i
H wr At
~P
RFD At
~d ~t~►o W + ro it 9 to i At
~c_~c :gel 13S At
IOU 1
Ago A~
' Lei' YY
w 0 ~ TRACT 1
uuc 2434AC
DALLAS ' e it 31 At d It At
of alle
a#' s~ _ iu ,rte as. I. H 95 I 'rt
• w "sip,-=~_..
ZONING EXHIBIT UfvILOPf,R,
MN 'ON ~s;m
306.5 ACRES•DENTON, TEXAS
yY ~ ~
r., r/r y
1 1 V '1 a. v r f M;. 4F :Yu"r ;F l' 'ti ] 1G rl 4 '10F
a
.
1 a,,^ v.jr. 1 Fa v G ,d~ } },v , r. fYl nl ! l5 A 4 G. '.pia r`I ?V, .'~y ! t^,.
a
%
DATEt WIS/8S
CITY CO 52L %8P0uT FogmT.
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM,. 0. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SULJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE FOR ZONING CASE Z-1707 1
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Z-1707 by
a vote of 4-1 at its meeting of November 14, 1984. The City Council
considered this item at its meeting of December 4, 1984 and the
concensus was approval.
SUMMAR :
A toning change from the multi-family W-1) district to the general
retail (OR) classification was approved on a .5326 acre tract located
north of Londonderry Lane and west and adjacent to Jason Drive.
QACKGROUND:
This site is located in a moderate intensity area dominated by
retail, neighborhood service and multi-family land uses. Intensity
is not a problem with this request and general retail land use is
compatible with surrounding land uses, surrounding zoning and Denton
Development Guide policies.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund,
Respectfully submitte :
01 A.AA
0, Chris Hartung
city manager
Prepared by:
I I '1 1
~j on AA Ole 1.-
Denisy d
Development Review Planner
V c WE
Director of Planning
and Community Development
09518
y° ! v,. w 'S r } ,.:~"!v4"W.~'.°_~~_w y .zk 4 rc •~r. ''-s x< art a; q 1' f ! yt. ~'4 19
4 rt. < :,i, l 3 •i r, c v1 N, V, 0
c r Y rv'a'. ^a
i r - .1., tr i,H 1 w. :1 r 1~ rv 'ice z fiJ r1
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDItiG THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEX".S,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY U.5326 ACRES OF LAND SITUATED NORTH OF AND
ABUTTING LONDONDERRY LANE AND WEST OF AND ABUTTING JASON DRIVE AND
MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK D, TEASLEY MALL SUBDIVISION;
TO PRLVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNA-
TION FROM t1ULTI-FAMELY "MF-1" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE TO
GENERAL RETAIL "GR" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID
PROPERTY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
Tnat the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby changed
from Multi-Family "MF-l" District C14saification and Use to Goner-1
ttetsil "GRIP District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas and being
approximately 0.5326 acres situated north of and abutting
Londonderry Lane and west of and abutting Jason Drive and more
fully described as Lot 1, Block D, Teasley Mall Subdivision.
SECTION it.
That the Zoning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby changed
from Multi-Family "MF-t' District Classification and Use to General
Retail "GRIP District Classification and Use under the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
SECTION III.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, .tidopted the l.th
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of
the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be and ti:,_
same is hereby amended to show such change in District Cfnssifica-
tion and Use.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general velfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitebility or particular uses, and with a view to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human Lives, and encouraging t:oe
most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to titre City
of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V.
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect Immedi-
ately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings
Z-1707/EL DORADO CAR WASH SYSTUIS/PAGE 1
T,AA m"
;u('1~Yr
having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due
notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1485.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY: ,
Z-1707/EL DORADO CAR WMI SYSTEMS/PAGE 2
4 a'}y ~,G`'3'` r cx r n i ti i t i, ♦ a+ : t a r+
~ Mp~c' ~ ~c j,~Y ~ A ~,~"y k ~ f t ~y ~ f4 f h7t' Y t ,(f. ~ l~ a ~ ~ ~ l e~Y i• z ~ ~i C
DATEt 1115185
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Kanager
SUBJRCTt ADoPTION of ORDINANCE FOR ZONING CASK Z-1708 r , 1-
RRCONHRNDATION:
The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval of Z-1708 by
a vote of 5-0 at its meeting of Novembor 14, 1984. The City Council
considered this item at its meeting of December 4, 1984 and the
concensus was approval.
SUM4(ARYt
A toning change from the multi-family (MF-1) district to the general
retail (GR) classification was approved on a .57 acre tract located
at the northeast cornoe of Londonderry Lane and Jason Drive.
U051I 9 M:
This site is located in a moderate intensity area dominated by
retail, neighborhood service and multi-family land uses. intensity
is not a problem with this raquest and general rotail land use is
compatible with surrounding land uses, surrounding zoning and Penton
Development Guide policies.
PROGRAMS DRPARTKKNTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED*
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
Thera is no impact on the general fund.
Rsopect ult subs tte
•
0. Chris Hartung
city manager
Prepared by:
Denise Spi ey
Development Review Planner
A r
Jeff x4
Director of Planning
and Comunity Development
09Sig
Yr~ er:.. i rr .J}. , fi < xKl,. to a. t ds °t.M w p ! :nr d', 1`k .P .e' ,rv
`4 t
NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE C17Y OF DENTON, TEXAS,
AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DENTONs TEXAS, BY ORDINAt;,:E NO. 69-1, AND AS SAID MAP
APPLIES TO APPROXIMATELY 0.574 A:ALS OF LARD SITUATED NORTH OF AND
ABUTTING LONDONDERRY LANE AND EAST OF AND ABUTTING JASON DRIVE AaD
11ORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 4B1, BLOCK B, TEASLEY BALL SUBDIVISION;
TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNA-
TION FROM MULTI-FAMILY "MF-1" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE '0
GENERAL RETAIL "GR" DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE FOR SAID
PROPER'rY; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY OKDAINS:
SECTION 1.
That the Z.oninb Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby changed
from Multi-Fanily "MF-1" District Classification and Use to General
Retail "GR" District Classification and Use under the Coup rehensive
'toning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of, land lying and being
situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas and being
approximately 0.574 acres of land situated north of and abutting
Londonderry Lane and east of and abutting Jason Drive dn,i core
fully described as Lot 481, Block B, Teasley Hall Subdivision.
SECTION It.
That the Zcning Classification and Use designation applicable
to all or part of the property described below is hereby changeu
from Multi-Family "MF-1' District Classification and Use to General
Retail "GR" District Classification and Use und.:r tite Cooprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas:
SECTION III.
The Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, tdopted the ISth
day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to tits Curie of Urainances of
tite City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. fig-I, be, and the
same is hereby amended to shuw such change in District
Classification and Use.
SECTION IV.
That the City Council of the Cicy of Denton, Texas, hereby
finds that such change is in accordance with a co,aprelansive plan
for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of
Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other
things for the character of the district and for its peculiar
suitability or particular uses, and with a vivo to conserving the
value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging ttie
most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City
of Denton, Texas, and its citizens.
SECTION V,
That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immedi-
ately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings
Z-1708/DALLAS DESIGN GROUP/PAGE 1
t E r~
rs7F to A
Y r> Ouw cr. C ! ? :r 4 r♦ t 4
r n ',r ' r r i Rr ~ Vb";' ~R rr ~"i rR x.r Td'B tip, p ;,5p 4 - ~ ti? r~ a. ~ s! F
4114V lip
~ ~Tp T
Y
r ;
and having the heretofore oCouncil been held d City the Denton,1gTex and s. after Cmission
notice thereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1965.
RICHARD 0. SMART, 14AYOR
CITY OF DE'NTOUl TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE AELE9--CTTT-3TckETARY
C17Y OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
BY--
Z-1708/DALLAS UESLGN GKOUP/PAGE 2
y h, r.h •
s.
lip
d -;u s ~.9 r i r r"rtti . 7 r y r , f S7 1 ra `i.. er i+° 1'
W'.
WEt 1/1S/8S
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORKAT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINAMCK FOR ZONING CASK H-33
RECOMMENDATION:
The Historic Lendmark commission recommended approval of H-33 by a
vote of 6-0 at its meeting of September 10, 1984. The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended approval of H-33 by a vote of 4-0 at
its meeting of October 10, 1984. The City Council considered this
item at its November 6, 1984 meeting and the concensus was approval.
S'WIWY :
Historic landmark zoning designation was approved for this structure
located at 213 S. Oak Street.
RACKCROU0 %
This house is deserving of landmark designation due to its age and
architectural condition and its association with the Hvers family,
one of the most important families in the development of the City of
Denton.
PROGUM, DEPI.RTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
Not applicable
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact on the general fund.
Respe fu sub t d:
e
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by:
Deniso Spi ay
Developow nt Review Planner
A to
Jeff
Difeelbr of Planning
ind Cowunity Mvelopmat
09SIS
S F
/ 4 1 Y AY 'rl 'M1 a A
r r S
T ,
'03L,
NO.
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING 213 EAST OAK STREET IN THE CITY OF
DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK UNDER
ORDINANCE NO. 80-30 (ARTICLE 28A OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE); AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning
and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton have recomaended
that the fin herein described be designated as a historic
landmark in the City of Denton; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I.
That the following described property, to-wit:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated, lying
and being in the City of Denton, County of Denton, State of
Texas, a part of the H. Sisco 320 acre survey, and more
particularly described as follows, to-wit:
BEGINNING one hundred (100) feet east of the southeast corner
of a lot formerly owned and occupied by R. L. Base on the north
side of East Oak Street;
THENCE east one hundred (100) feet;
THENCE north one hundred fifty (150) feet;
THENCE west one hundred (100) feet;
THENCE south one hundred fifty (150) feet to the place of
beginning and being the same lot conveyed by R. H. Evers and
wife, Mary E. Evers to A. F. Evers by Deed dated September 21,
1897, to which reference is here made.
is hereby designated as a historic landmark under Ordinance No.
80-30, Article 28A of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Denton, Texas.
SECTION Ii.
That said property herein described shall be indicated up,%n
the zoning maP of the City of Denton as a historic landmark ty
the letter H , and the property herein described shall be
subject to all of the terms, provisions and requirements of
Ordnance No. 80-30, Article 28A of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas and such designation
shall be inladdition to any other use designation established
in the City's coning ordinance applicable to such property.
SECTION III.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after its
date of passage.
H•33/PAGE 1
iy . r:. fl! " ul~ v. " ,Ij 1 tig's' 3 t ~t, .+,y. w fir! ^C }q'h r 4 fs'o r !
C
PASSED AND APPROVED this the „ day of I985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHARLOTTE , CITY SECRETKU
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
H-33/PAGE 2
~~0~ i~ bM°.~ ~'irv! M 1Sf' r' h ly ~ y >4 VNw f Mrv, 4 f ! 1 1,.1' > M 51i ~~~~I
C1 T Y COIJNC r t REPORT FORMAT
TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council '
FROMi G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJSCT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO HUD FOR
SECTION 312 LOAN FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION;
Staff recommends approval.
SLRIMAR Y:
They city is eligible to apply to the Department
of Housing and Urban Development for up to $288,685
of Section 312 loan funds.
BACKGROUND:
This item has not been submitted to any board or
corunission for approval. It was a staff initiated
request.
PROGRAMS, DEPAR:'fENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED.
Th(a CDBG Section of the Planning and Community
Development Department would administer the program.
FISCAL VIPAC T .
The CDBG Section would cover the administrative costs
for the program operation. There would be no impact
on the General Fund.
Resp y,G~~, r, c ed:
(j. LilrlS ar u
City !tanager
Prepared by:
Tnm,
Ju is Moore
Community Development Coordinator
p d:
Jeff
Director of Planning
and Community Development
x n e-+v x h ?x, r 'm i ~ ,
r :'x r p~q,. x " ° ,xK
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 8, 1985
TO: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
FROM: Elizabeth Evans, Community Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: Section 312 Rehabilitation Loan Funds
The city of Denton is eligible to apply to the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for up to $288,685 of
Section 312 Rehabilitation loan funds. Section 312 loan funds
must be used in the CDBG target area and can be used to reha-
bilitate residential properties.
Section 312 loans would be available to low and moderate
income persons at an interest rate of 38 for 20 years. The
CDBG office would accept and review applications and make
referrals to the Fort Worth Office of HUD for their final
approval. The city would be required to administer the program
including loan closing, but would not be required to monitor
loan payments. Funds will not be awarded until applications
have been approved by HUD and them only for each individual
application.
The city of Denton anticipates requesting up to the max-
imum level of funding. In order to complete the application
requirements for the program, a resolution must be adopted by
the city council authorizing the city to apply and committing
the administrative costs for operating the program. Attached
is a copy of the required resolution. if any further information
concerning this program is needed, please let me know.
Thank you.
jo
Eliz&beth
EE/pj
I
i
w w~i t r ' J stt n t ~r +en „p £.w~ i'y fn a a+r' r4 a~ }rw '~V t},~~: iMr 7ld r~' rat
ry a
` wt
t
i
R E S O L U T I O N
WHEREAS, the Fort Worth Regional Office of the U. S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development has Section 312 Rehabilitation
loan funds available for distribution to cities certifying their
desire to participate in the Section 312 Program and comaitting
themselves to paying the administrative costa incurred in operating
the program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
believes it to be in the beat interests of the citizens of Denton
to participate in such program;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DENTON, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The City of Denton, Texas, hereby certifies its desire to
participate in the "Section 312 Program," Section 312 of the
Housing Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 1452b., as amendod, and hereby
commits itself to pay the administrative costs incurred in the
operation of the program.
SECTION It.
The Office of Community Development is hereby authorized to
SLbmit the appropriate application for Section 312 Rehabilitation
loan funds including a copy of this Resolution therewith.
SECTION III.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1985.
RTCHM"-. S7EWAAT AYOR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CHAROTTE ALLEN CITY SECRETARY
CITY OF DENTON,,TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY o
CITY OF DENTON,, TEXAS
Byl
~j 1 n 0 1rY " k F ' 1 L s uX , 7y i 4i +n y^b t k pf 9 fY i~ 4 ! .,i 1T f n ~ • +q a
~7 1! 4"1 ri d e;"4 d~ ~d yw ai I'~.4 ~r'r P, 4` i C.'ri i1 I' n
4S' x' s j ll f i dr ~r
DATE1 1/9/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT fTj
TO, Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution to amend the Fox-51 Airport lease.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Board to approve the
amendment to the airport lease agreement of July 1, 1980, between the
City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited, permitting Mr. Frank Strickler to
lease an additional 30,800 square feet of Airport property to the south
of Mr. Strickler's present lease property for the purpose of constructing
a second aircraft hangar.
SUMMARY :
This second tract of land, 140 X 220 or approximately 30,800 square feet,
is to be located immediately south of Mr. Strickler's present lease prop-
erty. Mr. Strickler plans to build an aircraft hangar of approximately
10,000 square feet and to move his business into it upon its complc,'.On.
His present hangar would then be leased for airport related purposes.
Mr. Strickler's total combined area of airport lease property would be
50,800 square feet or approximately 1.16 acres.
BACKGROUND:
The Airport Advisory Board in the regular meeting of December 12, 1984,
expressed some concern that by leasing Mr. Strickler both pieces of
property fronting the taxiway,the property behind or to the east of the
leased property would be blocked. Th6 Airport Manager was asked to
investigate. Through the generous assistance of Dr. John Carrell,
Chairman, Airport Advisory Board, a solution was found which would allow
public access to the property along the north side of Mr. Stricklers'
leased property. Board members were advised by telephone and poled,
and a recommendation to approve the amendment of the Fox-51 lease was
obtained.
PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED:
This expansion of Fox-51's activities should increase business on the
Airport, but should not effect any other department or group.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Airport revenues will be increased by at least $10018.00 per year. There
will be no cost to the General Fund.
p <Lync Respectfully submit ed:
t
Airport Manager Go Chris r un
City Manager
Approved:
Bill AnBe'i~
f{ Ay Y 5 S P.!. IMF n C; f F x• MJ •6~ Y "{r M4 k
f 'hY t~
THE IVARBIRD AND SPORT AIRCRAFT SPECIALISTS.
SALES • SERVICE - TRAINI,\'G
November 91 1984
Mr. John Carrell
Chairman, Airport Board
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr. Carrell:
This is to advise you that we would like to lease the land area to
the south of our existing, property. This space is presently
described in our contract with the City. We have arranged for a
confirming survey and will make it available to you very shortly.
We propose to construct another hangar, somewhat larger than our
existing facility, with an associated ramp area in front o: it.
This hangar will be of the same type construction, color, etc. as
our present one. We will be using the same contractor as before
and should have blue prints available for you soon.
Upon completion of this new hangar, we intend to move our
activities into it and then make our vacated hangar available for
airport related purposes.
Best regards,
'~3-tcL.tl{
F.b.Strickler
FDS/bj
AIU,VICIPAL AIRPORr Rr,1 80A 102 DENTOV, TEXAS 76201 8 1, •3831302
ry ~yr, y3 ~ trL '1 a~* r~. ! ~ren~ Sx Sri `"~t s°C"e~' n p~{- f. .'r ?F 'a'~;`+ 7~Tg`t ~o T ~ 6,'~ M f !ri Er14 4?`i Qp
~y
dv "~i a~ri S r a4k i vd, uc .1 zj f dA 7 4+rp.
r
r
MINUTES
CITY OF DENTON
AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
DECEMBER 12, 1984
REGUriAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD, WEDNESDAY,
DECEMBER 12, 1984, AT 6-00 P.M.., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM OF
THE MINICIPAL BUILDING.
MEMBEIS PRESENT: ARNO, CARRELL, KEITH, HAYWARD* SMITH
MEMBER ABSENT: GARLAND, WRIGHT
OTHERS ?RESENT: BOB HUNTER, BILL ANGELO, BRUCE CARDWELL AND CLINT LYNCH
of the City Staff
1. The Board considered the minutes of the regular meeting of November
280 .984. A motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes as
written. The motion carried unanimously.
2. The Btard met in executive session at 6:20 P.M.$ to discuss real estate
and ligal matters. The Board reconvened in open session at 1-10 P.M.
3. The Board considered the approval of Mr. Frank Strickler's lease option
reques: for property south of Mr. Strickler's present hangar. Because
of con, ern that the property to the east of Mr. Strickler would be blocked
by the expansions the Board asked the Airport Manager co develop a plan
whereby the City could continue to have ready access to such property
while at the same time allow Mr. Strickler to have both pieces property
along tie front. Shculd such a plan be found the Board indicated that
they wotld recommend approval of Mr. Stricklets request.
4. The Boarl considered the Airport Development Plan wherein a detailed
layout o' the South East corner of the Airport was reviewed. In
anticipa ion of a continued strong demand for lease property in this
area, th:a layout was developed to establish the location of taxiways,
roads anc parking areas, and to reduce the size of each le.2se area to
more acccrately determine the cost of each sectionk development.
With no further business, the Board adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
I
I
r>v ~r~F cqC, - F}; 7Pbn''._i V; T ra 77^t a 1 'Xj ~'filq r
t p l 5~.4 •ixf.
t
R
R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, the City of Denton lessee lane, upon this Denton
Municipal Airport to Fox-51 Limited by Lease agreement dated July
1, 1980; •nd
WHEREAS the lease agreementdrovides that Fox-51 Limited may
lease additional land at three an one-half cents per square foot
per year if such right is exercised prior to July 1, 1985;
WHEREA.q, fox-51 Limited, acting by and through its President,
F. D. Strickler, has determined to exercise its right to Lease
additional land; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
believes it to be in the interest of efficient airport operations
and in accordance with the existing lease agreement to lease
additional property to Fox-31 Limited;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF
DENTONO TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION I.
The attached amendment to the airport lease agreement of July
16 1980 between the City of Denton and Fox-51 Limited is hereby
approve.
SECTION It.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the attached
amendment on behalf of the City and tt~e City Secretary is hereby
directed to affix this Resolution, with toe executed amendment
attached, to the original airport lease agreement Bated July 1,
1980, inscribing on the original agreement the fact it has been
amended and the effective date of such amendment.
SECTION III.
This Resolution shall be effective Lmmediatelr upon its
passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of
1985.
RICHARD 0. M
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
ATTEST:
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JOE D. MORRIS, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CITY Of D~ENTTO/N,ppTEXlASr
$Y: °1kenYf' a lef
AMENDMENT TO AIRPORT LEASE AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS )
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PPESENTS:
COUNTY OF DENTON )
The City of Denton, Texas, hereinafter referred to as Lessor,
and Fox-51 Limited, hereinafter referred to as Lessee, do hereby
mutually agree as follows:
1. Subparagraph A of Paragraph I of the airport agreement
dated July 1, 1980, between Lessor and Lessee is hereby
amended to read as follows:
A. Land:
A 100 x 200 foot tract of land, being approximately 10,000
square feet, and a 140 x 220 foot tract of land, being
approximately :0,800 square feet, having a combined area of
approximately 50,800 square feet or 1.166 acres, described
as follows:
COMMENCING at the northwest corner of a tract of land as
conveyed to P, F. Breen by deed recorded in Volume 127,
Paga 185 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas s+:
point lying in tha South right of way line of FM Road 1513;
THENCE vest along the south right of way line )f FM Road
1515 a distance of 350 feet to a point;
THENCE north along the west right of way lira of F4 e.oad
1515 a distance of 1,000 feet to a point;
THENCE west perpendicular to said ri;'nt of ;a;: line :f F`?
1515 a distance of 810 feet, •-,ire or less, t: i t
the east edge of the pavement of cne nOrtn taxiway;
THENCE north 13°30'41" west Tong the rest edge :i
of said north taxiway a distance of 10 feet to a p ins f..
A corner;
THENCE nortn 76°09'19" east perpendicular to saie east edge
of pavement a dlstar.ce of 1a0 feet to the point of regio:.-
ins;
THENCE north 13°50'41" vest 160 feet east of and parallel
to said east edge of pavement a distance of :20 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE north 26°09'19" east perpendicular to said east edge
of pavement a distance of 100 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE south 13°50'41" east 280 feet east of and parallel
to said east edge of pavement a distance of 200 feet to a
point for a corner;
THENCE north 16°09'19" east perpendicular to said east edge
of pavement a distance of 40 feet to a point for a corner;
THENCE south 13°50'41" east 320 feet east of and parallel
to said east edge of paveaont a distance of 220 feet to a
point for a corner,
THENCE south 76°09'19" west perpendicular to said east edge
of pavement a distance of 140 feet to the place of beginn-
ing and containing 50,800 square feet of land, more or less.
2. Subparagraph A of Paragraph III of the airport agreement
dated July 1, 1980, betveon Lessor and Lessee is hereby
amended to read as follows:
A. LAND RENTAL:
$1,718.00 per year, payable annually in advance on the
first day of February each year during the term of this
agreement or, at the option of the Lessee, payable in
monthly installments as follows: the first monthly payment
due on the first day of February, 1985, in the sum of
$148.17 and equal monthly installments chereafter in the
sum of $146.17 in advance, )n or before the first day )i
each and every month during the term of this agreement. It
is expressly understood and agreed that the Yearly rental
for the land herein leased shalt he readjusted at the end
of each five (5) year period during the term of tnts lease,
(the first such readjustment occurring July 1, 1965), up )r
down, cn t~.e 'oasis of the priportion that t'ne then v:rrert
United States Cost of Living Index :or tn.e DaLia,,F:rt
North, Texas Standarl Metropolitan Statistical >rea, ie
compiled by the U.S. Department of Laoor, 3ureau ~if
Statistics, bears to the lure, 1980, index which was :35.-
(1967 • L00). The land rental amount is now based :pon
.035 dollars (3.5 cents) per square foot per year for the
land herein leased and it is expressly understood and
agreed that the rental Increase or decrease, if any, for
each five (5) year rental adjustmelt under this lease shall
not uxeted fifty (501) percent of the annual rental of One
Thousand Seven Hundred Sevtnty•Eight Dolars ($1,118.00).
F:u
1
3. Subparagraph (J) of Paragraph XY of the airport agree.
went dated July 1, 19809 between Lessor and Lessee relating
to the right to lease additional property is hereby deleted
because the Lessee has exercised this right through this
lease amendment.
EXECUTED this day of January, 1985.
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, LESSOR
BY:
RICHARD Q. ,MAYOV
ATTEST:
CWLOTTE MEN, CITY 3ECKETAR
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
A?PPROYED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JUE D. 1 ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
CETY OF DENTON, TEXAS
FOX-31 LIMITED, LESSEE
BY;
U. 3 1 t t,, c , PRESIDE%,",
THE STATE OF TEXAS i
COUNTY OF DENTON I
Before me, 0s undersigned autnority, in and for said County,
Texas, on this date personally appeared F. D. Strickler, known to ae
Co be the person and cfftcer whose name is subscribed to the fore-
going instrument, and acknowledged to me that the same was the act
of the said Fox-51 Lisited, a corporation of the State of Texas, and
that he executed the same as the act of said corporation for the
purposes and consideration therein expressed, and in the capacity
therein stated.
Given under my hand and seat of office this dry
of , 1984.
NOTART PUBLIC
DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
My Commission expires:_
4
7 7
DATE:01/15/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: 0. Chris Hartung, City manager
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY AND FINAL k&PLAT OF THE AVONDALE ADDITION, SECTION
iii, BLOCK 0, LOTS 17, 18, and 19
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Comaission voted 2-3 to approve the
replat which in effect is making no recotmtaendatioa to the City
Council.
SVMKARR :
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of the replat is to re-establish lot linen between
Lots 179 16, and 19.
PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GKOUPS AFFECTED:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
NIA
Respectfully tubmitt
~d/y/J •
0. Chris Hartung
City Manager
Prepared by,.
Harry N. Q?ersaud
Development Review Planner
App oved:
14
Jeff M yo
Diroeto o P1 nniag
and Community Development
0544)
i
~ A S. a 1 l A .Y.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
BACK-UP SV1g4ARY SHEET
MEETING DATE: January 15. 1985
SUBJECT: Approval of the preliminary and final replat of
Lots 17, 18, 15); Block G. Avondale Addition
SUMMARY: This is a tract of 1.068 acres situated south
of an a!uttinq Churchill Drive and west of and
adjacent to Nottingham Drive and being a replat
of Lot 11, 18, and 19; Block G. Avondale
Addition, Section 3. City of Denton. The site
is zoned residential (SF-10) and the purpose of
the replat is to remove existing lot lines to
accomodate a building which currently exists on
the site.
Sanitary sewer, water, electric, telephone and
gas services and facilities are adequate and
available. The preliminary and final replat
conforms to the minimum requirements of the
Denton Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations.
ACTION REQUIRED: Approval of the preliminary and final replat
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning commission considered
this matter at its meeting on January 2, 1985
and voted 2-3 on a motion to approve the
preliminary and final replat. There was no
motion made for denial which in effect is
making no recommendation to the City Council.
ALTERNATIVES: Approval or denial of the preliminary and final
replat
ATTACHMENTS: Reduced preliminary and final replat
Planning and Zoning Commission minutes
D
Harry . Persaud .
Development Review Plannor
0544]
;a-
CURVE DATA
a~•} f xmr xyl,~ HM i _•x .,1
r J
Y r 14n Inm{ ►Ir.l ►YL Anl 1, A..
l.C i"'. ~I '4o ItL
•V V\
raw SP-00
APO SOP-Ap
1 ~ r
. Y ` Y ~ f I.~r T r •rrr • , : rl r la' . i
AM ~ w..r`. 1 1
jbw
M--'~/~ rry ~r yr ~
, M1'f 1111 ♦..wR
Of ap Is
IM_._-_.~t~ t k ~ Alf _ ~ , \ f1f •f
r 1
la-
1M
M u
.r r
ey Y .r • !r"., . r - '
40 arr• •.tTCl1 'Y. .L Y• to l• 1.~..\
f0
1 ANM; • 1 Y Y11'• YY.„
L •1. 1 x1111114 1 .ax ~ A H AA .;i1r
01V 11 xl 'N. IN . 1.1 F M I M. ~1J' 1. M
,~/Y!• • k'.x I .I IIY r. AY'1r 't. t . . 4 1o ♦ n «
r{ rAiy,t'H lfTl ! 4. 1~- l/ .A ,a 140 , n n1 A.f ~..~Ir,o l r.nY.
•7 r+ I •'17 rl 'A 6'1:'l W%10. 1. h 1, 0.9
AtC ~f,/
.a A~J NAMMETT 6 NMN, MiQ
r .-r.......r.«..r.~1 _
0 ell E ~ ~~~5
/r
re ~eri~roAM
a Ac' burr ilAli 7111A !01 rf11 kAl
DTI J 11' r~.:.
_ CURVE DATA
Ar. Ir 11 II1~IIf PH natl N "1" u
ar w or of Ii/ +il 1r Cfafi'1 It Dora U
5N44, 14.. I ! 1, CMIBOCTia W 105 CIwc4 of A I." Will mxm
Nf if IT1ef ►M ►Jr ISM
p ,t w w 1Ni rtw lr 51'! Mw ea.IrlY sflweu PUMP Iflot us. m 1OT it, iinl~ , kA= 1146
rum M lIU►1K1 wish is TM call Of Naive. M i
Co.
h "0 OW tsomm 11 5tt111f 1, TKl I, MAP UCNA w OMM
CMSTT. TfW. Ai MIN NOU /YTICtWII 11X5111164 NiM$
IMIAMI& ►1 14 INT54N CONS Of Iii 111 11. 111[1 16 AS Y
81Qfa' Q too lu to vu 141 lun-mru of 0"1010 will r s
MMN Il1CM140411 w Cw7H/4 "In,
I 7NIt1 INMT1 of wun it 0111146 M "cow r11T am 711 on
I y 14 4 A*=.w+n at 64u BM(&UN rla 1 MCA" v Ir.r TRT
r• 4 l►'r 0111
I twlq Nil It fw1W 17 pimm N lfclr! 1111 l1irtam w
io.tl R@ N AS TWO 1111
711111 RAPT /1 Mau w k;Mtt1 46 IIC/N ft" A ►tnow w
III.M Mt w Is led tip,
mu%fR "MM will l IMl N M 1ltf, Ylis a OFT" is" r a
IwWC M NIlrTG/ If C6nw. 1 WIN of Ill./t Polio • c~
{b~16R) M Nflf M MCMI N 11N1111 w BMW" VW. 11.46 MO All
uc%2" w 11.46 rill N 4 low plot
"SM MAPS 10►n of 11c1W of 11 IN New Wi N Woods w
M
w`"` ~ 1{1 Itt H AS [IFI ltl if IN wPI111MTp NC W COW="
, i~~ 1 iIA1
if
N
T1M0 110 ► Bill" N TY 11CCt. C clonal. Ma I
ran, 46
■ wit
u I skew, 1 in "CN w f"i1M .M /56 is
41 1 i
ff11r1
16 of wwl IS mum 11 item 11NTY I lPCr1 I/!t. fl.l! 11Mi.
M IY1riw 11.ft WIT N M Coal 1111
• "NO fin ►mltl N 1M LLR. Yl IN 1 CUPILAl Wi w 11
fwlW w furm r luw . l WIN of 1751.11 fiT. a Mom
M f/1w II IMYY fl IWn1 ft UWM SAM 164.51 I 6 w
to TAiw w 161.11 INt ft 4 100 ►UI
~r TNN11 IC1n If fwwu M 11NTf1 M $BMW W1 If BMW= w
I Off•IW Mt
n 146 RI11-01-IMIwIN we Owtlulr LNi ~1i
IA'1 h ! . ?...!A...... LOT.. ..It
~i ?ovum K" it1N no N Tau I416m,
Ay'
tMT. n, I ! t towl"KI M 1Y/N Met, "Pla Will mole,
Dim 0, lw n 464IA 4 MICAIMI IMRR T CI t Wiof If. ~p 1 tI•
1 511H 11 , 'I"M of 11tt 1. of tIl ITfrAY 101070/ Ta M plR PIN nI nN7tN/,
it 111 M 01111101 w11CATC w ti 011111,14 115 MUM, A 111 kN
'y W11511f1 111111 YIIw.
K 1I
&U"of"la IS
BOCK D I *In" M Iwla IS
tt r►nt i. 111 I1MUtwM INT#A f161► .1 All Pill Yi► Boom
Ir 914111 101 1111 w f1w0YIN PRAM JIN ITMb I' MMM W
1 I I c11ITMCtIN 1 tal/IYflw, W IMIMIIMi fi i 1c i
trcrn► m ft* toll Nwwl M Mijumm 714
IIMMN A71 11 711 "Wilt "MIS IUML
41M x111 n 1wr in 1W w lnld Pill ran w
amB Warm own.
*"",1 c11tif1Yw
I
OM M Trr IN It 1114 HwINI"I
lrp 1rT I. cAw r. WAM YItIT1i1 1b0.11 M111M. far af1000 ppcipll, t Down tw 1 1was nil Rut no IS em M domm
mm M to Ni r i►t to 1146 slid IM n11111N 1111
Want 1r11 w riilrl 11Mwuli to IIb11N1i lrli s
fw711/i/ w Ir of" M ow". If1Ti fw11CIW.
1 104 ~
191 Iwo AW KAM " 6 0464611 W- 1
. - - GONllAJ4A tlglltU! f ll1M1dM
Nq IIIn11011 11 tt11{ 1Hd !Ot Mat! RA► ,
.
14
P & Z Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 7
E. Recommend approval of preliminary and final replat of
the Avondale Addition, Section 111, Block C, Lots 17,
18 and 19.
(UNAPPROVED) Mr. Persaud stated that as site is zoned residential
(SF-10), 48 notices were mailed to property owners in
preceding subdivision in comppliance with state law.
One reply form was returned in favor, five reply forms
were returned in opposition.
He continued that property is located at corner of
Nottingham Drive and Churchill Drive, that it is a
replat of three lots; that purpose of the replat is
to shift existing lot lines to accommodate a building
which currently exists on the site.
Mr. LaForte referred to reply forms in oppposition and
advised that property owners in the area Egad contacted
him conceruing the state of corner lot where dirt had
been removed for fill for middle lot, leaving a large
hole; also, they were concerned about developer's heavy
equipment tearing upp street, leaving holes in the street.
Na asked that laws be reviewed to address what these
people are objecting to.
tfr. Persaud said that a garage was added on, that there
was not enough space; that replat was requested Co shift
lot line away from that building.
Mr. Clark advised that the city has only one building
inspector for new construction, that he cannot measure
each building to assure that it is proper distance from
lot line, that the contractor did not place building
properly on the lot. On question, he said that remain-
ing lots would meet requirements.
Mr. Sidor questioned what would happen if plat was not
approved since this is after the fact.
Don Lynch, petitioner representing his father who is
the builder, stated Nhey had had three surveys done on
the property, that no pins existed on property, that
they had problems with city plate as bearings were off
and there were no markings. He said that as a condition
of v_le a request was made to enclose garage and add a
carport, that they planned to close on the property the
next, day. He advised that when error was discovered
Mr. Doyle, building inspector, told him that approval
of plat and building permit could be concurrent.
P & Z Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 8
On questLon about two adjacent lots, he said that corner
lot would require a lot of dirt work, that it is unbuild-
able at present time; they have approval to build on the
other lot. He said their ultimate plan is to develop
whole street but they cannot do several at a time.
He replied to condition of street by saying that this is
a 10 year old subdivision, that Nottingham was resurfaced
about 10 months ago, that Churchill was cracked when they
began construction. He said they have to get heavy
equipment in to fill in holes and compact lot, that when
dirt is put on a road, there is going to be breakage.
He said this is an old road that was cracked when they
began construdtion.
Mr. LaForte said one spot was pretty bad.
Mr. Lynch said they have not even started on that lot.
Chairman asked petitioner if he is satisfied that tlha
latest survey it correct. Mr. Lynch answered yes.
No one spoke in opposition to request.
Mr. Persaud continued staff report stating that plat
conforms to requirements of subdivision regula-ions and
Development Review Committee recommends appr.ova_
Petitioner offered no rebuttal.
Chair declared public hearing closed.
Mr. Escue moved to recommend approval of preliminary and
final replat of the Avondale Addition, Section III,
Block G, Lots 17, 18 and 19. Seconded by Mr. Claiborne.
Mr. LaForte repeated concerns of neighborhood and said
he dict not think building inspector should say that
Planning and Zoning Commission would automatically
approve a plat.
Mr. Sidor asked if there was any way Commission could
withhold approval until developer restores the two
vacant lots to way they were so they will be present-
able to neighborhood.
Mr. Morris answered that two separate things are
involved, that staff can take appropriate action on
condition of adjacent lots, that he did not think
denial of replat could be based on that.
Mr. Sidor said he was concerned about condition six
to twelve months in the future.
P & Z Minutes
January 2, 1985
Page 9
Mr. LaForte said the hole is 10 to 12 feet in dianeter.
Mr. Pearson expressed concern about health and we.fare
of neighborhood, stating that a child could fall Into
hole.
Mr. Lynch said they have had a problem with people
dumping trash on lot, that they have to pay to Caul
trash off. He said they plan to cover up the hoole.
Vote was called on motion:
Aye - Escue, Claiborne
Nay - Cole, Pearson, Sidor
LaForte abstained
Motion failed (2-3)
Chairman asked for a motion for denial.
None was offered.
Chair informed petitioner that request for :eplat would
be referred to City Council with no recommendation from
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
I [S tr. ! 4 M1 1 1 'y., iA'.i 4v M':
DATE: 1/15/85
CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
SUBJECT: Appointment of Deputy City Secretary
RECOMMENDATION:
I am recommending that Jennifer Imrie, Senior Secretary
in the City Manager's Office, be appointed as Deputy
City Secretary
SUMMARY:
See memorandum in agenda back-up material.
BACKGROUND:
Deputy City Secretaries are traditionally City Manager's
Office staff personnel. Due to changes in our office
personnel, I am requesting this appointment.
PROGRX4 S, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED;
None
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund.
Respe& A su
ar g
City Manager
Prepared by:
G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
Name
Title
Approved:
Name
Title
~ 'Y r re CN 1° N e a ,i+~ a. C" v > w J I
CITY OF DENTON
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM. G. Chris Hartung, City Manager
DATE: Jart+ary 10, 1985
SUBJECT: Appointiaent of Ueputy City Secretary
As you know, Deputy City Secretaries traditionally have been
rembers of the City Manager's Office staff. Due to personnel
changes, I am recommending that Jennifer Imrie be appointed as
a Deputy City Secretary.
'3. Chris-Hartung
ca
16t8C
e v r •r rWy n;. r i s y ^l w. l) f +1 .~'"T.a}-c--' "i
EMERGENCY AGENDA ADDENDUM
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL t
January 15, 1985
7:00 p.m.
1. Consider approval of a resolution amending City of
Denton policies and procedures.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the
bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas,
on the day of , 1984 at o'clock
(a.m.) (p.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
1634C